HomeMy WebLinkAbout1994/08/03 - Agenda PacketCITY. COUNCIL
AGENDA
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
REGULAR MEETINGS
1st and 3rd Wednesdays - 7:00 p.m.
August 3, 1994
Civic Center
Council Chambers
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CalifOrnia 91730
City Councilmemtbers
Dennis L. Stout, Mayor
Charles J. Buquet, Mayor Pro Tern
Wfilism J. Alexander, Councilmember
Rex Gutierrez, Councilmember
Diane Willisms, Councilmember
Jack Lnm, City Manager
James L. Markman, City Attorney
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk
City Office: 989-1851
City Council Agenda
August 3, 1994
PAGE
All items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in
writing. The deadline for submitting these items is 6:00
p.m. on the Tuesday prior to the meeting. The City Clerk°s
Office receives all such items.
A. CAI 1 TO ORDFR
1. RoliCall: Buquet , Alexander ,Stout
Williarns , and Gutierrez
B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS
C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
This is the time and place for the general public to address
the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from
addressing any Issue not previously included on the Agenda.
The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter
for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five
minutea per Individual.
D. CONSFNT CA~ ;NDAR
The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be
routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by
the Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be
removed by a Councilmember or member of the audience for
discussion.
1. Approval of Minutes: June 15, 1994
Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 7/13/94 (FY 93/94) and
7/13/94 (FY 94/95); and Payroll ending 6/30 94 for the total amount
of $945J392.68.
,
Alcoholic Beverage Application for On-Sale General Eating Place
for Pepper's Lounge & Restaurant, John L. and Lou June Forti, 9740
19th Street.
Approval to receive Waste Oil Recycling Grant and establishing
the Fiscal Year 1994/95 budget, and amending the City's budget
for Fiscal Year 1994/95. ·
City Council Agenda
August 3, 1994
PAGE
2
10.
Approval ~o continue appropriations from various funding sources
for Fiscal 1993/94 Capital Improvement Projects which are
continuing in Fiscal Year 1994/95.
Approval to transfer a vehicle to the County of San IBemardino for
use with the D.A.R.E. program.
Approval to grant an easement in favor of GTE California
Incorporated for a portion of Parcel 3, Parcel Map No. 11286,
located at Milliken Avenue south of Base Line, and in addition,
grant a bill of sale for equipment located on the site in favor of the
same.
RESOLUTION NO. 94-153
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. APPROVING
THE GRANT OF EASEMENT FOR A PORTION OF
PARCEL 3. PARCEL MAP NO. 11286AND GRANTING A
BILL OF SALE FOR EXISTING EQUIPMENT ALL IN FAVOR
OF GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPORATED, AND
AUTHORIZING THE CITY ENGINEER TO SIGN SAID
DOCUMENTS AND CITY CLERK TO ATTEST THE SAME
Approval to execute San Bernardino County's Schedule 'A" for
Law Enforcement Services (CO 94-017] for the City of Rancho
Cucamonga in the amount of S8J:X]6~.~
Approval to execute an extension of the Agreement' (CO 90-143)
for the Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance Contract for
Landscape Maintenance Districts 1 and 5, with Landscape West,
Incorporated of Anaheim, California in the amount of $170,751.24,
to be funded by: Landscape Maintenance Distdct 1, Fund 40-4130-
6028 ($170,254.68) and Landscape Maintenance District 5, Fund 44-
41306028 ($496.56).
Approval to execute an extension of the Agreement (CO 90-144)
for the Landscape and Irrigation Contract for Landscape
Maintenance District 2 (Victoria] and Landscape Maintenance
District 4 (l'erra Vista) with Landscape West, Incorporated of
Anaheim, California in the amount of S596~19.72 to be funded by:
Landscape Maintenance District 2, Fund 41-4130-6028 ($469~524.72)
and Landscape Maintenance District 4, Fund 43-4130-6028
($127 J::]95.[:r).
13
14
15
20
21
22
City Council Agenda
August 3, 1994
PAGE
3
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
Approval to execute an extension of the Agreement (CO 90-145)
for the Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance Contract for the
General Fund Parkways and Landscape Maintenance Districts 3A
and 3B with Mariposa Horticultural Enterprises, Incorporated of
Irwindale, California in the amount of $210,497.28 to be funded by:
General Fund 01-4647-6028 ($148339.80), Landscape Maintenance
District 3A, Fund 42-4130-6028 ($1,183.44] and Landscape
Maintenance Distdct 3B, Fund 46-41306028 ($61 j:X:]4.04).
Approval to execute an Improvement Agreement Extension for
Tract 13753, located on the north side of Ellena Street, north of Base
Line Road, submitted by Lewis Homes.
RESOLUTION NO. 94-154
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGAo CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13753
Approval to accept Improvements, and Release of Security for
Tract 12895, located on the west side of Baker Street, south of
Foothill Boulevard.
Release: Faithful Performance
Letter of Credit (Private Streets)
$ 118J:]:][].00
RESOLUTION NO. 94... 15,5
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING
THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 12895
Approval to Release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract
13858, located at the southwest corner of Milliken Avenue and
Banyan Street.
Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street] $ 26274.00
Approval to accept the Athletic Field Lighting Touch Pad
Systems, located at Red HIll Community Park and Heritage
Community Park, CO 94-018, as complete, Release the Bands and
authorize the City Engineer to file a 'Notice of Completion. ·
23
24
26
27
28
29
30
City Council Agenda
August 3, 1994
PAGE
4
RESOLUTION NO. 94-156
a RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING
THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR ATHLETIC FIELD
LIGHTING TOUCH PAD SYSTEMS, LOCATED AT RED
HILL COMMUNITY PARK AND HERITAGE COMMUNITY
PARK. CO 94-018, AND AUTHORfZ]NG THE FLUNG OF A
NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
31
F. CONSFNT ORDINANCFS
The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time
of first reading. Second readings are expected to be routine
and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the
Council at one time without discussion. The City Clerk will
read the title. Any item can be removed for discussion.
(':ONSIDERATION OF DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 94-[~ - CITY
OF RANCH(')(':UCAMONGA - A request for various streamlining
amendments to the Development/Design Review procedures
and Land Use regulations.
CONSIDERATION OF INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT
94-03 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend the
Land Use Types. Land Use Type Definitions, and the permitted and
conditionally permitted uses of various subareas.
C:ONSIDERATION OF ETIWANDA SPECIFIC Pt AN AMENDMENT 94-01 -
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend the Land
Use Provisions regarding permitted and conditionally permitted
uses for Office and Commercial Districts.
~--ONSIDERATION OF ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN
AMENDMENT 94-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to
amend the permitted and conditionally permitted uses within the
Neighborhood Commercial District.
CONSIDERATION OF VICTORIA COMMUNITY PI AN AMENDMENT 94-
01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend the
permitted and conditionally permitted uses within the Office and
Commercial areas.
CONSIDERATION OF TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PI AN AMENDMENT
94-09 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend the
permitted and conditionally permitted uses within the Office and
Commercial areas.
City Council Agenda
August 3, 1994
PAGE
5
CONSIDERATION OF SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 94-01 -
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend the time
extension provisions.
ORDINANCE NO. 528 (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING
DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT NO. 94-02,
AMENDING THE DEVELOPMENT CODE TO
STREAMLINE THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCESS,
AND MODIFYING THE LAND USE REGULATIONS FOR
COMMERCIAL/OFFICE DISTRICTS. AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF
ORDINANCE NO. 529 (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGAo CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING
INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 94-03,
AMENDING THE LAND USE TYPES. LAND USE TYPE
DEFINITIONS. AND THE LAND USES WITHIN VARIOUS
SUBAREA, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT
THEREOF
ORDINANCE NO. 530 (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CrrY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING
ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 94-01.
AMENDING THE LAND USES WITHIN THE OFFICE AND
COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN
SUPPORT THEREOF
ORDINANCE NO. 531 (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING
ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 94-
01, AMENDING THE LAND USES WITHIN THE
NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS, AND
MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF
32
5O
57
64
City Council Agenda
August 3, 1994
PAGE
ORDINANCE NO. 532 (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING
VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 94-0|.
AMENDING THE LAND USES WITHIN THE OFFICE AND
COMMERCIAL AREAS, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN
SUPPORT THEREOF
ORDINANCE NO. 533 (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE C!]Y COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING
TERRA VISTA COMMUNII~ PLAN AMENDMENT 94-
02, AMENDING THE LAND USES WITHIN THE OFFICE
AND COMMERCIAL AREAS, AND MAKING FINDINGS
IN SUPPORT THEREOF
ORDINANCE NO. 534 (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CFIY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING
THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE. TITLE
16, SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE. AND MAKING RNDINGS
IN SUPPORT THEREOF
71
79
88
F. ADVFRTISFD PUBIIC HFARINGS
The following Items have been advertised and/or posted as
public hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the
meeting to receive public testimony.
CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE AND ADOPT THE NONDISPOSAL
FA~--II fly ELFMENT (NDFE)
RESOLUTION NO. 94-157
a RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CAUFORNIA, APPr'~)VING
AND ADOPTING THE NONDISPOSAL FACILITY
ELEMENT AS REQUIRED BY AB3001
CONSIDERATION OF THE VICTORIA COMMUNITY P! AN AMENDMENT
Q4-C)~ - CITY tIF RANCHO (':-U~-AMONGA - A request to amend the
Victodo Planned Community pertaining to the timing of the
construction of Elleno Park.
92
94
100
City Council Agenda
August 3, 1994
ORDINANCE NO. 535 (fi~ reDcling)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CffY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAUFORNIA, APPROVING
VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 94-
02, TO MODIFY THE COMMUNITY PLAN TEXT
PERTAINING TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF ELLENA
PARK, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF
PAGE
7
112
P-. PUBIIC HFARINGS
The following Items have no legal publication or posting
requirements. The Chair will open the meeting to receive
public testimony.
No Items Submitted.
H. CITY MANAtI-FR'S STAFF RFPORTR
The following Items do not legally require any public
testimony, although the Chair may open the meeting for
public Input.
CONSIDERATION TO EXECUTE AGREEMENT (CO q4-059) FOR THE
RECIPROCAL WAIVER OF FEES BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA AND CHINO BASIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTI~ICT
2. STATUS REPORT/UPDATE ON ROUTE 30 FREEWAY
UPDATE REPORT ON LIBRARY BOARD OF DIRECTORS INTERVIEWS
(ORAL REPORT)
114
117
I. COUNCIL BUSINESS
The following items have been requested by the City Council
for discussion. They are not public hearing items, although
the Chair may open the meeting for public Input.
1. STATUS REPORT ON GRAFFITI REMOVAL PROGRAM
UPDATE BY COUNCILMEMBER GUTIERRE7 ON HISTORIC
PRESERVATION COMMISSION SUBC. OMMII'rEE MATTERS
3. DISCUSSION OF INTERIM AGRICULTURAL USE FOR CENTRAL PARK
118
City Council Agenda
August 3, 1994
PAGE
8
J. IDFNTIFICATION OF ITFMS FOR NFXT MFFTIN~--
This is the time for City Council to identify the items they
wish to discuss at the next meeting. These items will not be
discussed at this meeting, only Identified for the next
meeting.
K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE: PUBIIC
This is the time and place for the general public to address
the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from
addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda.
The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter
for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five
minutes per individual.
L. ADJOURNMENT
MEETING TO ADJOURN TO EXECUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSS:
ANTICIPATED LITIGATION PER GOVERNMENT CODE
54956.9, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA VS
HYDROTECH.
PROPERTY PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION
54956.8, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF
ROCHESTER, SOUTH OF FOOTHILL, WITH VALLEY
BASEBALL; JAMES MARKMAN AND LINDA DANIELS
NEGOTIATORS; CONCERNING PRICE AND TERMS OF
PAYMENT
I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby
certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on
July 28, 1994, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per
Government Code 54953 at 10500 Civic Center Drive.
June 15, 1994
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL MINtrYES
Regular Meeting
A. CA!.I. TO ORDER
A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, June 15, 1994, in the Council
Chambers of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive:, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting
was called m order at 7:09 p.m. by Mayor Dennis L. Stout.
Present were Councilmembers: William J. Alexander, Charles J. Buquet II, Rex Gutierrez, Diane Williams, and
Mayor Dennis L. Stout.
Also present were: Jack Lain, City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Linda D. Daniels, RDA Manager;,
Rick Gomez, Community Development Director, Brad Buller, City Planner, Larry Henderson, Principal Planner, Joe
O'Neil, City Engineer; Bill Makshanoff, Building Official; Robert Dominguez, Administrative Services Director,
Suzanne Ota, Community Services Manager, Deborah Clark, Library Manager, Diane O'Neal, Management Analyst
II; Susan Mickey, Management Analyst I; Chief Dennis Michael, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; and
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk.
B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS
B1. Presentation of Certificate of Reeognition to Deputy Tim Masters by the City of Upland for his
participation in the Third Annual D.A.R.E. Fair.
Mayor Stout presented the Certificate m Deputy Masters.
B2. Presentation m the Finance Department for Receiving the Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in
Financial Reporting for Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 1993.
Mayor Stout presented the Award m Robert Dominguez, Administrative Services Director.
B3. Presentation of Proclamation to James Clark for his Lifelong Contribution to the Community and the
Preservation of our History.
Mayor Smut presented the Proclamation m James Clark.
Mayor Smut invited everybody m the ceremony m be held July 4 m dedicate the Chaffey-Garcia House.
Mr. Clark thanked the City Council and staff for all of their help and support.
City Council Minutes
June 15, 1994
Page 2
C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
CI. Marcus Solomon stated he would be going to the Goodwill Games for skateboarding in Russia and asked
the Council if he could mice some souvenir-type things from Rancho Cucamonga with him.
Mayor Stout thought that was a great idea.
Mr. Solomon also thanked the Council for the great job they were doing in the City by making it one of
the safest cities in which to live.
D. CONSENT CA1,ENDAR
Jack Lain, City Manager, stated Item D12 should be removed from the agenda and that it would come back to the
Council when it was ready.
DI. Approval of Minutes: May 18, 1994
D2. Approval of Warrunts, Register Nos. 5/25/94 and 6/1/94; and Payroll ending 5/19/94 for the total amount
of $1,567,111.21.
Approval of Investment Schedule for the period ending May 31, 1994.
Approval to surplus OCE Microfilm Reader/Printer.
Approval of Temporary Variance of Sports Field Lighting at Red Hill Community Park for June 25 and 27,
D5.
1994.
D6.
Approval to grant the Amateur Radio Operators group use of Heritage Park Equestrian Center for Field Day
Competition on June 24, 25 and 27, 1994.
D7.
D8.
Approval of the Second Annual Cat Net Horse Show to be held at the Heritage Park Equestrian Center.
Approval to reject all bids for the Bike Pathways and Lockers at Various Locations.
D9. Approval to order the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting
Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for MDR 94-03, located on the north side of Fifth Street, east of Milliken
Avenue, submitted by Pomona First Federal Savings and Loan Association.
RESOLUTION NO. 94-116
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN
TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET
LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR MDR 94-03 (APN: 229-
34 1-08)
D10. Approval to execute Reimbursement Agreement for Installation of a Portion of a Master Planned Storm
Drain Facility in connection with development of Tract No. 14866, located at the southeast comer of Lemon Avenue
and London Avenue, submitted by The Pennhill Company.
City Council Minutes
June 15, 1994
Page 3
RESOLUTION NO. 94-117
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT
FOR INSTALLATION OF A PORTION OF A MASTER PLANNED STORM DRAIN
FACILITY IN CONNECTION WITH DEVELOPMENT OF TRACT NO. 14866
D11. Approval to execute Agreement (CO 94-045) with the County of San Bernardino to provide Library
Services for the City of Rancho Cucamonga during the transition period July 1, 1994 through August 31, 1994.
D13. Approval to execute Improvement Agreeme, at, Improvement goeuritioa and Monumontntion Cash Deposit
for Tract 1J 121, located at the southwest corner of Millikon and Ilighland Avenues, submitted by K. IIovnanitm
Companioa of Southern California II, Incorporated and release of previously submitted Improvement Agreement,
Improvement Security and Cash Monumontntion Dopooit aoooptod by City Council on FobnO 20, 1991, from
Rheadoe/San Juan, A California Limited l~tnorship. ITEM REMOVED FROM AGENDA.
REFvOLUTION NO. 9~ 118
A RIiBOLUTION OF TIIll CITY COUNCIL OF TIlE CITY OF RANCIIO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVIiMF_~IT ACRIiiEMF_t~T,
IMPROVI~ME)FY 8F~URITII~S AND MONUMEvNTATION CABtI DE.POgIT FOR
TRACT 1~1121 AND RELICAgING TIII~ IMPROVt~MENT ACREEMENT,
IMPROVI~Mg)IT 8F~URITY AND MONUMgNTATION CAgII DEPOSIT
PREVIOUSLY ACCEFI~D gY CITY COUNCIL ON FEBRUARY 20, 1991
D13. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 13281, located on the northwest corner of
Base Line Road and Rochester Avenue, submitted by Brock Homes.
RESOLUTION NO. 94-119
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13281
D14. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 13114, located on the southeast corner of
Vineyard Avenue and Calle Del Prado, submitted by Bayoun Development.
RESOLUTION NO. 94-120
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13114
D15. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 14644, located at the east end of Camellia
Court east of Beryl Street, submitted by Jorge Garcia.
RESOLUTION NO. 94-121
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 14644
City CouncilMinutes
June 15, 1994
Page 4
D16. Approval to accept Improvements, Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion for Tract 10210, localeL1 on
the north side of Almond Street west of Sapphire Street
Release Faithful Performance Bond
Sixeels $ 1,284,000.00
Undergrounding 535,000.00
Accept Maintenance Guarantee Bond
Su'eets
Undergrounding
128,400.00
53,500.00
RESOLUTION NO. 94-122
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR
TRACT 10210 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION
FOR THE WORK
MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Alexander to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports
contained in the Consent Calendar with Gutierrez abstaining from the Minutes of May 18, 1994 and the Investment
Schedule for the period ending May 31, 1994; and with the exception of Item D12. Motion carried unanimously, 5-
0.
CONSENT ORDINANCES
El. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC
PLAN AMENDMENT 93-03 - GENERAL DYNAMICS - A proposed amendment to cream a new Subarea 18,
bounded on the south by 4th Street, on the east by Milliken Avenue, on the north by the A.T. & S.F. (Melxolink)
Railroad, and on the west by Cleveland Avenue and Utica Avenue, and other related amendments to provide
consistency with the Subarea 18 Specific Plan - APN: 209-272-01, 04, 07, and 08; 210-081-22 and 23; 210-082-
02, 11, 17, 37, 38 and 39; and 210-361-01 through 26.
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, mad the title if Ordinance No. 524.
ORDINANCE NO. 524 (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC
PLAN AMENDMENT 93-03, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE INDUSTRIAL AREA
SPECIFIC PLAN TO ESTABLISH A SUBAREA 18, AND OTHER RELATED
AMENDMENTS, IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE SUBAREA 18 SPECIFIC PLAN,
FOR 380 ACRES OF LAND BOUNDED ON THE SOUTH BY 4TH STREET, ON
THE EAST BY MILLIKEN AVENUE, ON THE NORTH BY THE A.T. & S.F.
(METROLINK) RAILROAD, AND ON THE WEST BY CLEVELAND AND UTICA
AVENUES, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN
SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 209-272-01,134, 07, AND 08; 210-081-22 AND 23; 210-
082-02, 11, 17, 37, 38, AND 39; AND 210-361-01 THROUGH 26
City Council Minutes
June 15, 1994
Page 5
MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Alexander to waive full reading of Ordinance No. 524. Motion carried
unanimously, 5-0.
MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Alexander to approve Ordinance No. 524. Motion carried unanimously,
5-0.
E2. CONSIDERATION OF SPECIFIC PLAN 93-01 - GENERAL DYNAMICS A plan for the
redevelopment of 380 acres of land that would include recreational, commercial, and retail facilities surrounding an 18-
hole golf course, bounded on the south by 4th Street, on the east by Milliken Avenue, on the north by the A.T. &
S J:. (Metrolink) Railroad, and on the west by Cleveland Avenue and Utica Avenue.
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the tide of Ordinance No. 525.
ORDINANCE NO. 525 (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SPECIFIC PLAN 93-01, THE
SUBAREA 18 SPECIFIC PLAN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT
THEREOF
MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Alexander to waive full reading of Ordinance No. 525. Motion carried
unanimously, 5-0.
MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Alexander to approve Ordinance No. 525. Motion carried unanimously,
5-0.
F. ADVERTISED PUBI,IC HEARINGS
FI. CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION UPDATING THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE FEE
SCHEDULE Staff report presented by Robert Dominguez, Administrative Services Director.
Councilmember Gutierrez clarified that the Chamber and BIA had received copies and asked what input they gave
regarding this item.
Robert Dominguez, Administrative Services Director, stated no input. was received regarding this item.
Councilmember Williams clarified that the Community Services fees had first gone through the Park and Recreation
Commission.
Suzanne Ota, Community Services Manager, stated that was correct.
Councilmember Gutierrez clarified how the building fees are set and asked if he could get a list of all fees involved
for building.
Rick Gomez, Community Development Director, stated he would provide this.
Councilmember Gutierrez stated he would like to see a copy of neighboring cities' fee schedules also.
City Council Minutes
June 15, 1994
Page 6
Robert Dominguez, Adminislrative Services Director, stated this information would be provided.
Mayor Stouf opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the City Council was:
Marlann Poindexter 'commented on the license fee for child care service people and stated she was required to
get a permit because of the number of children she cared for. She stated this Resolution would lower this
fee and asked the Council to approve it. She also thanked the City Council and staff for helping her get
her questions answered.
There being no further response, the public hearing was closed.
RESOLUTION NO. 94-09 1
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REPEALING RESOLUTION NOS. 93-035, 92-223-1,
92-223-B, AND 92-223-C AND ESTABLISHING A NEW COMPREHENSIVE FEE
SCHEDULE FOR PERMITS AND SERVICES PROVIDED BY ALL CITY
DEPARTMENTS, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
AND THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA POLICE DEPARTMENT BY MODIFYING
CERTAIN FEES ESTABLISHED IN RESOLUTION 92-223.
MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Alexander to approve Resolution No. 94-091. Motion carried
unanimously, 5-0.
F2. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
94-01A - WESTERN LAND PROPERTIES - A proposal to amend the General Plan Land Use Element Map to
change the land use designation from Office to Community Commercial for 25 acres bounded by Foothill Boulevard
on the south, Spruce Avenue on the west, Church Street on the north, and Elm Avenue on the east - APN: 1077-
421-58 and 63. Related File: Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment 94-01. Planning Commission
recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. Staff report presented by Larry Henderson, Principal Planner.
Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the City Council was:
Gary Luque of Lewis Homes, who stated he did not have anything to add, but would be happy to answer
any questions.
Mayor Stout stated the City would like to do a press release and asked if they would like to join the City in this.
Mr. Luque stated they would be happy to do this.
There being no further response, the public hearing was closed.
Mayor Stout felt it would be a good idea for the City to do an inventory and map of public art located in the City,
i.e., that which is located in Terra Vista Town Center.
Rick Mager, Lewis Homes, presented a site plan of proposed buildings for the Term Vista Town Center for
the Council's information.
City Council Minutes
June 15, 1994
Page 7
RESOLUTION NO. 94-123
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 94-
01A TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM OFFICE TO
COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL FOR 25 ACRES OF LAND BOUNDED BY
FOOTHILL BOULEVARD ON THE SOUTH, SPRUCE AVENUE ON THE WEST,
CHURCH STREET ON THE NORTH, AND ELM STREET ON THE EAST AND
MAKING FINDINGS IN SLIPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1077-421-58 AND 63
MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Alexander to approve Resolution No. 94-123. Motion carried
unanimously, 5-0.
No items were submitted.
G. PUBLIC HEARINGS
H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS
HI. CONSIDERATION OF MATIERS FOR THE NOVEMBER 8. 1994 ELECTION Staff report presented
by Debra J. Adams, City Clerk.
Mayor Stout asked if Resolution Nos. 94-126 through 94-129 were placed on the agenda at the request of the City
Clerk.
Debra Adams, City Clerk, replied yes.
Councilmember Gutierrez asked general questions regarding the election for this November and how it would be
sn'uctured. He inquired about the vacancy of the Mayor's position and what would happen if the Council had a
vacancy on it. He stated he supported the changing of the City Clerk's position.
Councilmember Alexander felt if it was appointed you can get someone in that position that is qualified.
Mayor Stout pointed out that a large portion of that person's responsibilities include records management and that
you only need one person to do both functions.
Mayor Stout felt all of the Resolutions should be approved, but did not think Resolution No. 94-129 should be
passed because the City would have to pay for rebuttal arguments and hated to increase the cost for this to be on the
ballot.
Councilmember Williams asked if this Resolution was not approved, would it preclude any resident if they choose to
pay for it, to write an argument. She felt if a citizen wanted to write a rebuttal argument, they should have that
opportunity.
Debra Adams, City Clerk, stated she was not sure this could be done and would have to check with the Registrar's
office.
City Council Minutes
June 15, 1994
Page 8
Councilmember Buquet suggested all the Resolutions be approved and if the Council needed to, they could
"unapprove" this Resolution.
Mayor Stout asked the City Clerk to find out by the budget meeting to be held on June 16th if someone has the
fight to write their own rebuttal argument and pay for it themselves if the Council doesn't approve the Resolution
allowing rebuttal arguments.
Mayor Stout felt in order to make the public comfortable with this that the City Clerk should be designated to write
the argument in favor as it pertains to Resolution 94-127.
James Markman, City Attorney, stated the City Clerk could not do this, that it had to be done by the legislative
body.
Mayor Stout stated he would write the argument and asked if Councilmember Buquet, as Mayor Pro Tem, would
also like to sign iL
Jim Frost stated this had been on the ballot several years ago. He did not feel the public knew what the
City Clerk does. He stated it was defeated then, but felt things have changed very much since then. He
agreed that the Council should write the argument in favor and that he also supported this concept.
James Markman, City Attorney, stated if you have an elected City Clerk it could make it very difficult to get
someone qualified to fill the position if there is a vacancy.
Councilmember Alexander inquired if the whole Council could sign the argument in favor.
Debra Adams, City Clerk, replied the entire Council could sign it.
The Council concurred with this.
RESOLUTION NO. 94-124
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CALLhNIG AND GIVING NOTICE OF GENERAL
MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD IN SAID CITY ON TUESDAY, THE 8TH
DAY OF NOVEMBER 1994, FOR THE ELECTION OF CERTAIN OFFICERS OF
THE CITY AS REQUIRED BY THE PROVISIONS OF THE LAWS OF THE STATE
OF CALIFORNIA RELATING TO GENERAL LAW CITIES, AND
CONSOLIDATING SAID ELECTION WITH STATEWIDE GENERAL ELECTION TO
BE HELD ON SAID DATE
RESOLUTION NO. 94-125
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A CHARGE TO CANDIDATES FOR
ELECTIVE OFFICE, FOR PREPARATION OF MATERIALS SUBMITTED TO THE
ELECTORATE AND THE COSTS OF THE CANDIDATE'S STATEMENT FOR THE
GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD IN THE CITY ON TUESDAY,
NOVEMBER 8, 1994
City Council Minutes
June 15, 1994
Page 9
RESOLUTION NO. 94-126
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CALLING 'AND GIVING NOTICE OF THE
HOLDING OF A SPECIAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD IN THE CITY
ON TUESDAY, THE EIGHTH (8TH) DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1994, SUBMITtING A
QUESTION TO THE ELECTORS OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, CONCERNING WHETHER THE OFFICE OF CITY CLERK SHALL
BE APPOINTIVE
RESOLUTION NO. 94-127
(OPTIONAL)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING CERTAIN OF ITS MEMBERS TO
FILE A WRITYEN ARGUMENT REGARDING A CITY MEASURE
RESOLUTION NO. 94-128
(OPTIONAL)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DIRECTING TtIE CITY ATIX]RNEY TO PREPARE
AN IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS
RESOLUTION NO. 94-129
(OPTIONAL)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING FOR THE FILING OF REBUTTAL
ARGUMENTS FOR CITY MEASURES
MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Alexander to approve Resolution Nos. 94-124, 94-125, 94-126, 94-127
(with all Councilmembers to sign the argument), 94-128 and 94-129.
Mayor Stout clarified that the City Clerk should come back to the Council Thursday at the budget meeting and let
them know if a person could write an argument and pay for it if Resolution No. 94-129 is not approve&
Motion carried unanimously, 5-0.
I. COUNCIl. BUSINESS
I1. CONSIDERATION OF A RECOMMENDATION BY THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMLrN1TY
FOUNDATION TO FILL VACANCIES ON ITS BOARD OF DIRECTORS Staff report presented by Susan
Mickey, Management Analyst I, who stated Chairman John Mannerino was also in the audience to answer any
questions the Council might have.
Mayor Stout asked that the individuals be voted on separately.
MOTION: Moved by Stout, seconded by Buquet to appoint Sue McNiel and Andrew Hall. Motion carried
unanimously, 5-0.
City Council Minutes
June 15, 1994
Page 10
MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Buquet to appoint Diana Lee-Mitchell. Motion carried 4-1 (Stout no).
Councilmember Buquet stated he would like to get information on what the goals and objectives or qualifications are
supposed to be for the director's of the Community Foundation.
Councilmembr Gutierrez stated he would also like this information.
John Mannerino stated he would be happy to prepare a report on the direction of where the Foundation is
going for the Council's agenda.
Councilmember Buquet stated he has frustration expressed to him by other members on the Foundation as to the
City's involvement, etc. and that is why he was asking for the information.
12. REOUEST BY MR. 1 .UNDY TO HAVE A CITY COUNCIL MEMBER INSTAr .1 .I~.D ON THE BOARD
OF DIRECTORS OF THE ROUTE 66 VISITOR'S BUREAU
Jim Frost stated he would speak on behalf of Mr. Lundy and felt the City needed to get involved in the
Board of Directors for the Route 66 Visitor's Bureau.
Councilmember Buquet stated he felt the Chamber should get involved with the Route 66 Visitor's Bureau.
Councilmember Williams stated she cannot support the Council getting involved with this in an official manner,
and that if an individual Councilmember wants to assist them on their own, that is their prerogative.
Mayor Stout stated he agreed with Councilmember Williams.
Councilmember Alexander stated he disagreed and felt the Council should officially appoint someone.
MOTION: Moved by Stout, seconded by Williams to deny the request of Mr. Lundy and for the City not to appoint
someone to be a member of the Board of Directors for the Route 66 Visitor's Bureau. Motion carried 4-1 (Alexander
no).
Councilmember Alexander stated he would still get involved whether the Council takes an official action or noL
,I. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
J 1. Mayor Stout stated he would like a Resolution to come back on the next agenda that indicates that Rancho
Cucamonga supports the construction of the Ontario airport terminal which would urge the City of Los Angeles to
do the same to improve the economy.
J2. Mayor Stout stated he would like a Resolution to come back on the next agenda which supports the
undergrounding of the Route 30 freeway.
City CouncilMinutes
June 15,1994
Page 11
J3. Mayor Stout asked that an Ordinance come back on the commercial security plan that Duane Baker has been
working on. He would like to discuss an Ordinance that could be used as a model developed by a city in Florida
regarding commercial businesses and reducing crime.
Councilmember Willjams asked if the cost to retrofit a business could be included in the report.
Mayor Stout stated this should be included in the report
J4. Councilmember Buquet stated he would like Caltrans and FHWA and SANBAG to also delete the elevated
profile of the freeway.
K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
No communications were made from the public.
I.. AD.IOURNMENT
MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Gutierrez to adjourn to Executive Session to discuss Labor
Negotiations per Government code Section 54957.6 to give Robert Dominguez, Administrative Services Director,
direction in regards to me meet and confer process with all Employee Groups. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0.
The meeting adjourned at 8:28 p.m., not to reconvene. No action was taken in Executive Session.
Respectfully submitted,
Debra J. Adams, CMC
City Clerk
Approved:
CITY OF RANCHQ CUC# %A
LIST QF MARRAN
FOR PERIODS 07-13- (93/943
RUN DATE: 01/13/94 PAGE: 1
ZTEH DESCRIPTION MARR NO NARR. ANT.
3364 lth AVENUE GRAPHICS
X A i A EQUIPMENT RENTALS COB, ZNC,
6357 A ~ g PHOTOGRAPHY
2732 ARC LOCK
3715 ACtION ART
4297 ACTION ODOR CONTROLS
4207 ALERT COMMUNICATIONS CO.
1167 ALL-CITIES PENCE COMPANY
6359 ALLEN, SANORA
6358 ALLEN, THERESA
266 ALPHA BETA
1430 ANERICAN BUSINESS FORHS
4264 AHERZCAN MATERIAL HANDLING
Z4 ARBOR NURSERY INCo
6360 ARMOff PLAZA MARKET
6361 ATTZLA, JANIRE
6362 AVZLEI, AMBER
6363 8ALUCNI, ANDREN
6364 BARKER, SHANNON
33 BASELINE TRUE VALUE NARDMARE
636S eATER, KRZSTZN
6366 BAUMAN, KVLE
6367 BICKER, CATHY
2863 BEE REMOVERS
6368 BERRY, RACHEL
6366 BERRY, THERESA
6369 BHAGAT, PUNAM
1338 BIG a AUTO PARTS
1247 BLAKE PAPER COB, INC.
6)70 BLESSING, KAREN/KELCEY
6371 BLOCKBUSTER VIDEO 106083
6372 BROOSKXm JESSICA
6373 ·flOUR, ANNETTE
6374 BUCKNAN, RAYMOND
6375 BUMPUSe BELINDA
457 C L E LUMBER CO
3942 CAL NESTERR TERMITE PEST CONTROL
66 CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SERVICE
6376 CHAR, YEN·
6377 CHIN, CHRISTOPHER
73 CITRUS MOTORS O;.TARZO, INCa
6378 CLACKLEIm NANCY
6379 COHEN, SANDY
6061 CONPETROL MANUFACTURING, INC.
643 COMPUTERLAND
4141 CONCRETE CORING CO.
3974 CONLIN RROS. SPORTING GOODS
6380 CRANKORB, HARK
4274 CULVER-NEMLIN, XNCe
6381 CUNXSKEY, XLENE
6382 C4JTHBERTSON, KRXSTA
OFFICE SUPPLIES
VEHICLE HAXNTENANCE/SUPPLZES
BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
RECREATION SUPPLIES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
INSTALLATION/SERVICE
HAINTENANCE REPAIRS
RECREATION REFUNO
RECREATION REFUND
RECREATION SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND
RECREATXON REPUNO
RECREATION REFUND
RECREATION REFUND
RECREATION REFUND
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
RECREATION REFUND
RECREATION REFUND
RECREATION REFUND
PROFESSIONAL SERVICE
RECREATION REFUND
RECREATION REFUND
RECREATION REFUND
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
RECREATION SUPPLIES
RECREATION REFUND
BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND
RECREATION REFUNO
RECREATION REFUND
RECREATION REFUND
RECREATION REFUND
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
MONTHLY PEST CONTROL 'SERVICE
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
RECREATION REFUND
RECREATION REFUND
VEhX~L~ MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES
RECREATION REFUND
RECREATION REFUND
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
COMPUTER MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES
MAINTENANCE REPAIRS
RECREATION SUPPLIES
RECREATION REFUND
OFFICE SUPPLIES
RECREATION REFUND
RECREATION REFUND
CNECKt OVERLAP
17816 690.69
87815 14,68
87616 50.10
87817 30193.75
17818 279061
87819 325.00
87820 2,101040
87021 S ,60 T.00
87RZZ 46.80
87823 50.00
67824 ZT.B&
ITe2S 1,522.34
87126 432.90
878~7 358.81
61828 203.00
87829 28.00
67130 20o00
87831 17.50
R7832 25.00
17833 363.12
87834 22.50
87835 4.00
87836 17.50
87837 387.50
87838 25.00
87839 24.00
87840 29.50
87841 554.90
87842 8.12
87843 4.00
87844 22.99
87845 25.00
878~6 140.00
878~7 40.00
876~8 17.70
17849 376.01
87850 180.00
87851 47.14
87852 30000
87853 30.00
87854 164.86
8TBSS 30.00
67856 70.00
87857 1,247.36
87858 8,300.00
878S9 225.00
17860 112.50
87861 25.00
87862 3,481.40
87863 29050
87866 24.00
·
%
L
L
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMQNGA
LIST OF MARRANTS
FOR PERIODS 07-13-94 C93/943
· RUN DATE: 0T/13/94 PAGE:
VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION NARR NO HARR. ANT.
6383 DAN THE HANDYNAN
lZDl DATAVAULT - U.S. SAFE DEPOSIT CO.
6384 DAVE'S CUSTOM HONE REPAIR
6385 DAVZSe JOAN
347 DAY-TZNERSe iNC.
6387 DETERICH, NEL
6380 DZAZe NICOLE
421Z DIVISION 7 CONSULTING
3~66 DOC JOE'S
6390 E-NUNOf ED
639X E-HUMUs TiNT
SZ3 EASTMANe INC
6389 EBERSOLEs RYAN
12S8 ELLISs JANA
4300 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES
639~ FALCONIs OIANE
4291 FANZLXAN PZPE& SUPPLY
~111 FARR'S -RANCHO CUCAMONGA
I14 FENCE CRAFT OF UPLANDs ZNC,
6393 FERRAGOTTZe ERZCA
ISS FZLARSKY i UATT
3912 FIRST IMPRESSIONS
40~7 FLAGHOUSE
6394 FLEEMORe MART
6390 POSTERs LAURIE
6396 FOSTERs ROBERT
6397 FRAYSHERe ABAGAZL
6398 FRENCHe AINEE
6399 PRENCHe AMBER
6400 FRENCNe ASHLEY
6401 GAUTHZERs NANDA
6402 GZBOONSt TAN
6403 GZLLILANDe IAILEY
6404 GILLlLANOs BROOK
137 GTE CALIFORNIA
6405 GUAOEZe NANCY
2134 N L K OXSTRZRUTORS
11646 HANLONs HHZTNEY
4196 HANSON OFFICE PRODUCTS
12637 HARO, TZNA
4038 NARTZQG g CRABILLs iNC.
12640 NAYSt CARQLE
~519 HECRETT SLAG PRODUCTS
12632 MEDLEYs FZONA
12656 HOETGERs IRAD
lSO HOLLXDAY R0CK CORe INC.
12638 HUt SANDY
IZ6S8 HUTTONe CAROL
495 HYDRO-SCAPE PROOUCTSs INC
46 INOUSTRIAL ASPHALT
165 LNGRAN PAPER
BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND
DATA STORAGE
BUSINESS LICENSE REPUNO
RECREATION REFUND
OFFICE SUPPLIES
RECREATION REFUND
RECREAIIQN REFUND
MAINTENANCE REPAIRS/SUPPLIES
MAINTENANCE REPAIRS
RECREATION REFUND
RECREATION REFUND
OPFZCE SUPPLIES
RECREATION REFUND
eElMB FOR BUS. RELATED EXPENSE
RECREATION SERVICES
RECREATXON REFUND
NAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
NAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
RECREATION REFUND
MONTHLY SERVICES
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
RECREATION SUPPLIES
RECREATION REFUND
RECREATION REFUND
RECREATZON REFUND
RECREATION REFUND
RECREATION REFUND
RECREATION REFUND
RECREATION REFUND
RECREATION REFUND
RECREATION REFUND
RECREATION REFUND
RECREATION REFUND
MONTHLY TELEPHONE BZLLINGS
RECREATION REFUND
$ERVXCE CALL
RECREATION REFUND
OFFICE SUPPLIES
RECREATION REFUND
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
RECREATION REFUNO
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
RECREATION REFUND
RECREATION REFUND
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
RECREATION REFUND
RECREATION REFUND
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
PAPER SUPPLIES
OVERLAP
1T665 6.67
17866 175.50
87867 6.48
87868 Z/.SQ
17~69 68.89
87870 17.50
87871 ZSeOO
87871 4SO.OO
87173 433.36
87874 32000
87875 32.00
87816 8e465.06
17177 32.00
87878 iS.GO
11879 60.00
87880 59.00
87881 140.23
87862 138.58
87883 885.03
87686 25.00
87885 30862.50
87186 1e474.17
87887 16.33
67888 15.00
eTes9 IT.SO
87690 17.50
67891 22.50
87892 30.00
87893 30.00
8 ? 694 30 · O O
87895 24.00
87896
87897 20.00
87898 20.00
87899 152,53
87900 59.00
87901 109.35
87902 35.00
87~03 500o?7
lifO4 29,50
87905 900.00
07906 45.00
87907 195.04
87900 28.00
87909 40.00
87910 59.54
87911 lt8.O0
87912 24.00
87913 IZ1.5S
87914 126.92
ITglS 461.36
k
·
CITY OF RANCHQ CUC A
LIST OF MARRAN1.
FOR PER[QDz 07-13-94 (93/94)
RUN DATE: 07113/96 PAGE: 3
VENDOR NARE [TEN DESCRiPTiON NARR NO NARR. ANT.
122 ZNLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETin
2317 ZNNAC
12647 [SPAS, PAN
612 JAESCHKE
12644 JENKINS, THQNAS
12653 JZNENEZt SHARON
2386 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY
12629 K L N CONNERCZAL iNVESTRENT
2943 KAST-A-NAY SUTNNEAR, ZNCo
12648 KING, JUNE
12695 KLECKEI, JOHN
115 KNART STORES
4012 KOCH FiNANCiAL CORP,
12657 KQLLZNG, JESS[CA
[2649 KONKEL, SHARON
4005 KRUZE i KRUZE CONSTRUCTION i ENG.
12642 KUBES, DAVID
12639 LASCALERA, DEBORAH
12633 LEUNO, JOANNA
12634 L[ER, DONNA
12643 LQPEZ, JACKZE
549 NARZPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT.[NC.
12652 HC CQRH[CK, CNRZS
S265Q HC LQUGHL[N, CARYN
12636 HEDLZN, KZH
1264Q NEJZA, NAR[A
2597 MINNESOTA NESTERR
12651 NORRIS, PAT
403 NORTON CQATZNGSt inC. - RAUER
12659 NQTT, STACY
12641 NULLZN, HAR[AH
3978 NUN[ PZNANCZAL SERVICES, inC.
2248 NAPA AUTO PARTS
3437 NATIONAL UN[FQRN SERVTCE
3546 NURSERYLANO
12654 QCCLESHAN, NZCHELE
[2631 OLD, PATTi
12635 QTAREZ, CARQLA
Z)S OMEN ELECTRIC
8661 PAREORS, CR[STZNA
8682 PASQUA, eRENT
8683 PASQUA, PHYLLIS
311 PZCQNE PLUNB[NG CORPORATION
848Q PRICE CQSTCQ
65 PkUDENT[AL OVERALL SUPPLY
228 RANCHQ CUCA REOEVELQPNENT AGENCY
8684 RAY, REGINA
8685 RICHARDSON, NELZNOA
276 RiVERS[OR BLUEPRINT
4257 RiVERSiDE CONSTRUCTION CQNPANY
8686 ROCK, BRYAN
** CHECKe OVERLAP
ADVERTiSiNG 6 87916
NA[NTENANCE SUPPLIES J 879/.7
RECREATION REFUND 87918
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE R 87919
RECREATION REFUND 87920
RECREATION REFUND 67921
NA[NTENANCE SUPPLIES 87922
RUSXNESS LICENSE REFUND 67923
RECREATZON SUPPLIES 67924
RECREATION REFUND 07925
RECREAT'I'ON REFUND 87926
MAINTENANCE SUPPLXES 87921
LEASE AGREERENT 87928
RECREATION REFUND 67929
RECREATION REFUND 87930
PROGRESS EST[NATE 61 87931
RECREATION REFUND 87932
RECREATION REFUND 87933
RECREATION REFUND 87934
RECREATION REFUND 87935
RECREATION REFUND 87936
LANDSCAPE NAZNTENANCE t 87937
RECREATION REFUND 87938
RECREATION REFUND 87939
RECREATION REFUND 87940
RECREATION REFUNO 8794,1
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES e 17942
RECREATION REFUND 67943
NA[NTENANCE SUPPLIES 6 e794&
RECREATION REFUND 87945
RECREATION REFUND 87946
ARGZTRAGE REBATE SERVICES 87947
VEHICLE NAZNTENANCE I 07948
UN[FORH SERVICES I 87949
LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES 87950
RECREATION REFUND 87951
RECREATION REFUND 87952
RECREATION REFUND 87953
NAZNTENANCE SUPPLIES lTH~
RECREATION REFUND 87955
RECREATION REFUND 87956
RECREATION REFUND 87957
PLUNBXNG REPAIR & SUPPLIES 87958
FEE REFUND 81959
NA[NTENANCE SUPPLIES I 87960
RE[NDURSE GRANT FUNDS 87961
RECREATION REFUND 87962
RECREATION REFUND 67963
PRINTS I 87964
PROGRESS ESTZHATE I 81965
RECREATION REFUND 87966
5,131.92
584,91
30.00
398.98
55.00
17.50
ZZ.)O
SR.OO
226o72
36.00
30°60
36.96
25,293°08
22.50
)OoOO
38,080,54
15.00
29.50
ZB.OO
59.00
25.00
12,347.31
40000
3S.OO
29.50
53.10
441066
35.00
2,596.77
30.00
22.50
1,503.00
54.02
62.06
50.98
25.00
3.00
29,50
2,495.34
27.00
3S.O0
3S.O0
Z05.84
6o41
86.63
687°54
27o00
59,00
150.08
200,446,13
22.50
%
·
·
·
·
·
·
CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA
LIST OF mARRANTS
FOR PERIOD: 01-13-94 (93/94)
ZTEN OESCRZPTZQN NARR NQ
** CHECK# OVERLAP
8687 RQSENTHAL, DEBRZE RECREATION REFUND 8T96T
IZ9Z S & S ARTS AND CRAFTS RECREAlZQN SUPPLIES 87968 597.85
8690 SAGNZAN, RQSINE RECREATION REFUND 87969 S6.OO
8686 SANPSELL, 8ILLIE RECREATION REFUND 87970 Z4oOO
8689 SANDOVAL, SABRZNA RECREATION REFUNO 87971 69.00
8691 SANTOS, ARLQU RECREATION REFUND 87972 30e00
3896 SENECHALe CAL INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 87973 48.00
351 SiGN SHOP, THE NAXNT SUPPLIES 67974 ZioSS
8691 SNYDER, ANANDA RECREATION REFUND 8T975 14.00
319 SO CALIF GAS CO. NQNTHLV GAS SILLS 87976 663.31
((( 87977 - 87982 )))
1432 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON NONTNLT ELECTRIC BILLS I 87963 7,533,16
8693 SPENCER, OERBZE RECREATION REFUNO 67984 35.00
8694 STIECRER, SUSAN RECREATION REFUMO 87985 24°00
8695 SHEENEYe TRACT RECREATION REFUNO 17986 )O.OO
8696 TARAPOREkALLA, DIANA RECREATION REFUNO 87987 S~,OO
115I TECHNIC OFFICE SUPPLIES 87988 103.06
8697 TIPPiNGS, NXCHELLE RECREATION REFUND 87989 45.00
1919 TONARK SPORTS INCo MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES · 87990 1,033.12
8698 TORTORO, JONATHAN RECREATION REFUND 87991 30o00
8699 TORTORO, MICHAEL RECREATION REFUNO 87992 3O.OO
8TOO TOWNSENO, JENNIFER RECREATION REFUND 87993 YO.OO
2958 UNPS ARE US ASSOCIATION UNP SERVICES I 879~)4 498°00
4196 UPSCO SUPPLIES & SERVICE 87995 4,937.96
8701 HANG, BANDY RECREATION REFUND 874F)6 3S.OO
8103 MARRENt DEBRA RECREATION REFUND 87997 Z6.OO
870Z NATERS, GLADYS RECREATION REFUND 87998
8704 NEISS, JOAN RECREATION REFUND 87999 ISoOO
4iTS NEST COAST NETTING MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 88000 X,6OO.OO
8706 YAUGO, MARY RECREATION REFUND 9600Z 3S.OO
8707 ZOLOT, JANiCE RECREATION REFUND 86002 56°00
** TOTAL 360,371.94
CITY OF RANCHO CUC. A
LEST OP NARRANT~
FOR PERIODS 0T-~3-96 (96/95)
RUN DATES 07/Z3/96 PAGE: Z
VENDOR NAME ETEN DESCRIPTION we eweewe
NARR NO NARRo ANT.
· , CMECKe OVERLAP
T7%3 ASSOCEATZQN OF BECQROS MANAGERS ANNUAL MEMBERSHEP DUES BEOOS 135.00
· 2.29 BACECN, PATRECK PBOFESSZQNAL SERVICES 88006 225,00
9T C P R S SURSCREPTZON d 88007 2.90.00
1333 CALIFORNIA MUSEUM FOUNDATION RECREATION TOUR e 18008 ZT~oO0
3006 CLASSE PARTY RENTALS EQUIPMENT RENTAL 88009
60 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF CALZF OENTAL iNSURANCE 88010
,105 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE FZNGERPRENTS B$OZZ 32..00
3177 FEJERAN, TIMOTHY C, FZRE EXTINGUISHER SERVZCE BOOZe. 100o00
3853 JZLES, LAMTON ,TM OF JULY ENTERTAINMENT 88013 300.00
12286 N M A S C NMASC MEETING 88016 75.00
· 000 N.S.A. MEMBERSHIP 88015 ,0.00
67 ON-CALL COMMUNICATIONS MONTHLY SERVICES O80%6 33.50
3010 PLAY CO. TOYS OVERPAYMENT BUSINESS LICENSE 08017
2961 FORCUt OANEEL RECREATZONeENTERTAZNNENT 86018 E65o00
32.96 PIERCEPAL MUTUAL MEDiCAL/DISABiLiTY iNSURANCE aeO19 6Eel96.2/
302, R L S MADRIGAL CONSTRUCTION OVERPAYMENT BUSINESS LICENSE 88020 80.10
6Z30 RBN LOCK · KEY SEOvZCE NAENTENANCE SUPPLEES 980Zl
2.1, SAN BERN CO SOLZO UASTE fiGMENT MONTHLY SERVECE 6902.2 2.w,66o23
3OE.T SAN BERNAROZNO COUNTY ReAoC.EeSe RADIO CLASS 8802'3 30.00
4253 SHALEMAR TOURS · CHARTER RECREATION TRiP 6802, 322.61
42.53 SHALENAB TOURS · CHARTER RECREATEON TRIP 6802.5
4IS) SHALENAB TOURS · CHARTER RECREATION TRIP 88026
30tO SHELLY'S AT VZRGZNEA DARE BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 8802.7 17.84
397 SOUTHERN DATA SYSTEMS MONTHLY COMPUTER CONTRACT 88028 575°00
2867 TOMNSENO, JIM ENSTRUCTOI PAYNENT 8602.9
3016 VZNATZERXe JERY PLUMBING BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 08030 26.67
3066 YUCAZPA MEGTONAL PARK RECREATION PROGRAM 88031 ZSO.OO
TOTAL
90wl,2.,70
AFFUCATION FOI .IICQIIQUC IIVIIAOl .UCINIi(I)
Tee Dl/f k_ ,e of Ak:ohdk leveroge Conrad
1901 kmadwmy ~R
$amaasmo, Call. 9811S
The ,,-dBqned/~.eby op/di8 for
2. N,U4E(S) OF APPLICANT(S)
I. TYPE(S) OF LiCENSE(S) FILE NO.
D
3. TYPS(S) OF iIANSAC11ON(S)
Amman Fee'
COO! 3635
Teq,. teemlt
FIr...r,,i::iVED
CITY CF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ef'l ( r,, ·
JUN 1, 5 100,t
C'~raadZ~pCod, teeny I?l"i't'ui'"t'ziil:zlj'141J~r~l'AL
loathe C (gl) 91730 b b
j' 6. If Premises Ucefised, 7. Are Premises Inside
Show Type of Ucense 47-21710A city Um~ts? Te~
I. Mailing Address (if different from S)--Numb~ and SiveE4
9. Hme been ' Z~I~..~ 10. Hm, e )~w ~ ~ieleted on~ ef ~ ~r~ A~
.
12. A~lkont
(b} t~
13, STA~ OF ~U~ C~.~ '~ .... ~d- __ ................ ~--~i~ ................
~~N
1S. STATE ~ ~LI~mlA
I& ~s)
19. t~,~.6~ae Number and Sirefie C"lly ~ Z)p Cede
~7."1 I*~'h .qt_, I.a8,-t~ l~sr - ~, ,(TH) q!7~fi .e~ p,4~O CO
D° Nel Wr~f Belme TRte Lble; F~ D~ UM O edl ' F,r, rou: C~e
RImcho Qrr ~ e,~ CA 91701
r-1 coRs t~lteB~
[] liemind, Feed h,~lee. .__04&mee
·
6
~7~o
9720
9730
~740
· ~750
9760 9762 976~ 9766 9768 .q770
PEPPER'S LOUNGE & RESTAURANT
9740 19th Street
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701
CURRENTLY ZONED: NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL
Zoning of Adjacent Properties:
North: Ca1 Trans and Low Medium
South: Low Medium Residentia]
East: Medium High Residentia|
West: Low Medium Residential
Residential
NORTH
/\
I st Trust
Bank
19TH
STREET
Carl's
Junior
9756
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY
SUBJECT:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
August 3, 1994
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
Will Jam J. O'Neil, City Engineer
Robert Zetterberg, Integrated Waste Coordinator
APPROVAL TO RECEIPT WASTE OIL RECYCLING GRANT AND ESTABLISHING
THE FISCAL YEAR 1994/95 BUDGET, AND AMENDING THE CITY'S BUDGET
FOR FISCAL YEAR 1994/95.
RECO~ENDATION
It is recommended that City Council approve the FY 94/95 budget for Fund 110 -
Used Oil Recycling amending the City's FY 94/95 Budget.
BA(XGROUND/ANAJ, ySIS
On May 5, lg94, the City was awarded a grant by California Integrated Waste
Management Board for Used Oil Recycling Program. The amount of the grant is
$74,316.00. Funds from the grant will be used for 1) upgrading household
hzardous waste site/used oil; 2) reusable waste oil containers; 3)
education/information; and 4) subsidize HHW staff time.
A separate fund (Fund 110 - Used Oil Recycltng) has been set up to track the
grant's revenues and expenditures.
Respectfully sl' , .
William J. O'N~
City Engineer
WJO:BZ:dlw
Y
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY
SUBJECT:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
August 3, 1994
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
Walt Stickney, Associate Engineer
APPROVAL OF CONTINUING APPROPRIATIONS FROM VARIOUS FUNDING
SOURCES FOR FY 93/94 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS WHICH ARE
CONTINUING IN FY 94/95
RECOIIENDATION
It is reconmnended that City Council approve continuing appropriations from the
various funding sources attached, for projects, or portions of projects,
originally projected to be expended in FY 93/94, continued into the 94/95 FY.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
Each year, during the course of the design and construction of the Ctty's
Capital Improvement Projects, it becomes necessary to extend that design or
construction activity into a subsequent fiscal year. This extension can be
due to a number of reasons, the more common of which are delays due to
required dealings (for example permitting activities, plan review) with other
agencies such as Caltrans or the County Flood Control District. Other delays
can be weather related or temperature fluctuations which can affect paving or
other construction activities. In some cases the contractor's work schedule
may extend over more than one fiscal year and thereby making it nearly
impossible to determine during the budget process in January how much of a
project will be billed by the contractor in any one fiscal year.
This Council action will reappropriate funds in FY 94/95 that were originally
projected to be expended in FY 93/94.
Respectfully submitted,
William j. O'
City Engineer
WjO:WS:ly
9
FY94/95 CONTINUING APPROPRIATIONS
Account
Project Description
14637-6028
14647-3900
14647-6028
14647-7043
14647-7045
1..4647-7048
1-4647-9332
1-4647-9333
1-4647-9334
14647-9335
1..4647-9217
1-4647-9336
54150-3913
9-4637-8780
9-4637-9209
9-4637-9211
9-4637-9212
9-4637-9304
9-4637-9330
10-4637-9110
10-4637-9113
104637-9306
10-4637-9315
12-4637-9204
12-4637-9310
12-4637-9326
21-4647-8822
22-4637-8753
22-4637-9205
22-4637-9206
Contract Services
Operations & Maintenance
Conlract Services
Capital Outlay/Building Improvements
Capital Outlay/Vehicles
4WD Utility Vehicle for Trails Crew
Capital Outlay/Playground Equipment
Tot Lot Deck Safety Replacement - Hermosa Park
Tot Lot Deck Safety Replacement - Lions Park
Controller Cabinet Safety Improvements
Irrigation Improvements to central computer - parks
Hiiven Median Irrigation improvements
Parkway tree replacement
Landscape plant material replacement
Red Hill nursery access road construction
Maintenance & Operations
Transportation Studies & Facilities Inventory
Highland & Locust Street Improvements
Archibald & Base Line Street Improvements
Base Line at Carnelian Intersection
9th & Hellman Street Improvements
Signals - Milliken extension from Arrow to Foothill
Pavement Management Program
Local Street Rehab.
Base Line - Day Creek to Victoria Park Lane
Rochester street improvements near RC High School
Signal - Haven @ Banyan
Signal - Church @ Terra Vista
Signals with Metrolink Station
Etiwanda Cobblestone Curb
Church - Archibald to Haven
Rochester - Highland to Banyan
Banyan - Mt Baldy Pi to Rochester
· Council;7/2o/94;Cont. Approp
Page 1 of 3
(FOR APPROVAL)
Continuing
Appropriation
$31,230
$525
$31,860
$2,816
$7SO
$17,ooo
$1o, ooo
$3,800
$4,6OO
$7,3OO
$1o, ooo
$3,18o
$7,31o
$63,747
$SOO
$68,00O
$7OO
$~2,370
$697,000
$264
$77,460
$204,933
$92,960
$326,000
$SO, OOO
$5,682
$6S,063
$25,967
FY 94/95
$73,000
$560,060
$655,410
$0
$56,930
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$5,000.
$0
$0
$2,000
$2,000
$2,000
$0
$2,000
$700,000
$0
$0
$0
$50,0O0
Total
Appropriation
for FY94/95
$104,230
$560,585
$687,270
$2,816
$57,680
$17,000
$10,000
$3,800
$4,600
$7,300
$10,000
$6,000
$8,180
$7,310
$63,747
$2,500
$82,000
$70,000
$700
$14,370
$1,397,000
$264
$77,460
$204,933
$92,960
$526,000
$50,000
$5,682
$115,063
$75,967
FY94/95 CONTINUING APPROPRIATIONS
A coo tl n t
224637-9211
224637-9311
224637-9313
234637-8859
234637-8863
234637-8948
244637-8914
284333-9331
284333-9329
324637-9027
324637-9031
324637-9109
324637-9113
324637-9328
354637-9031
354637-9205
354637-9328
364637-9326
374637-9326
404130-3900
404130-7043
404130-7045
404130-9320
404130-3900
414130-6028
4141304043
414130-7045
414130-9320
414130-9321
434130-3900
434130-7043
434130-7045
434130-9320
434 130-9323
Project Description
Archibald at Base Line Intersection
Monte Vista - Archibald to Amethyst
Carnelian - Base Line to 19th
Area 11 Carnelian 5D
Area VI Lemon SD
Area 1V Archibald SD
Signal - Archibald @ 8th
Calaveras Street Improvement
Vinmar Street Improvement
Haven Improvements n/o Foothill to Base Line
19th St. - Carnelian to Amethyst
Traffic Control Model
Local Street Rehabilitation
Milliken - Arrow to Foothill
19th St. - Carnelian to Amethyst
Rochester - Highland to Banyan
Milliken - Arrow to Foothill
Metrolink Station
Metrolink Station
Maintenance & Operations
Capital Outlay / Touch Pad System @ E. & W. Beryl Parks
Capital Outlay / Vehicles
Capital Improvement Projects - Mandatory ADA Study
Maintenance & Operations
Contract Services
Capital Outlay/Building Improvements
Capital Outlay / Vehicles
Capital Improvement Projects - Mandatory ADA Study
Capital Improvement Projects - Etiwanda Trail Drainage Imrovements
Maintenance & Operations
Capital Outlay/Building Improvements
Capital Outlay / Vehicles
Capital Improvement Projects - Mandatory ADA Study
Capital Improvement Projects - Milliken Park Parking Lot Extension
(FOR APPROVAL)
Continuing FY 94/95
Appropriation ~
$165,000 $0
$19,445 $0
$90,743 $5,000
$10,590 $0
$1,096 $0
$132 $0
$126,000 $0
$92,294 $0
$28,553 $0
$13,894 $3,500,000
$154,307 $2,000
$17,000 $15,000
$140,000 $0
$1,394,105 $0
$10,957 $0
$27,784 $0
$225,000 $0
$666,365 $600,000
$1,562,037 $0
$4,070 $40,940
$31,235 $8,000
$4,800 $0
$9,700 $0
$7,411 $65,720
$55,700 $539,200
$40,360 $0
$3,750 $0
$29,680 $0
$108,300 $0
$610 $42,600
$17,280 $0
$2,700 $0
$14,600 $0
$167,100 $0
Total
Appropriation
fi)r FY94/9,5
$165,000
$19,445
$95,743
$10,590
$1,096
$132
$126,000
$92,294
$28,553
$3,513,894
$156,307
$32,000
$140,000
$1,394,105
$10,957
$27,784
$225,000
$1,266,365
$1,562,037
$45,010
$39,235
$4,800
$9,700
$73,131
$594,900
$40,360
$3,750
$29,680
$108,300
$43,210
$17,280
$2,700
$14,600
$167,100
F-a' 'Counci:;7/20/94;Cont. Approp Page 2 of 3
FY94/95 CONTINUING APPROPRIATIONS
Account
45-4130-7043
454130-7045
464130-7043
464130-7045
46-4130-9324
47-4130-7043
47-4130-7045
72-4225-7045
90-4130-3900
90-4130-9320
Project Description
Capital Outlay/Building Improvements
Capital Outlay / Vehicles
Capital Outlay/Building Improvements
Capital Outlay / Vehicles
Capital Outlay Projects / Miiliken Ave. Landscape Rehabilatation
Capital Outlay/Building Improvements
Capital Outlay / Vehicles
Capital Outlay / Vehicles - Replace 2 Street Sweepers
Maintenance & Operations
Capital Improvement Projects - Mandatory ADA Study
Total
(FOR APPROVAL)
Continuing FY 94/95
Approprialion ~
$24,000 $0
$750 $0
$14,830 $0
$20,000 $0
$189,790 $0.
$1,000 $0
$1,500 $0
$10,450 $210,000
$4,330 $62,040
$16,560 $0
$7,432,824
Total
Appropriation
for FY94/9~;
$24,000
$750
$14,830
$20,000
$189,790
$1,000
$1~500
$220A50
$66,370
$16,560
oCouncil;7/20/94;Cont. Approp Page 3 of 3
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
August 3, 1994
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, City Manager
Robert C. Dominguez, Administrative Services Director
Joan A. Kruse, Purchasing Agent
REQUEST TO TRANSFER CITY VEHICLE
Reco,m~e~ndation
It is recommended that the City Council approve the transfer of a City vehicle
for use by the County of San Bernardino in the city-wide D.A.R.E. Program.
Background
The Police Department's budget for FY '94-95 includes an additional D.A.R.E.
police officer and vehicle, a van to be used by this officer. In order for
the vehicle to be used by County Deputies, and to be striped using standard
Police Department striping provided by the County, the vehicle must be
transferred to the County of San Bernardino. Once transferred, the vehicle
will become the property of the County of San Bernardino and will be available
for use by the Police Department. Responsibility for liability, maintenance,
and fuel will be the same as that'provided for other vehicles within the
Police Department's fleet. At the end of its useful life, title to this van
will be transferred back to the City for $1.00.
The vehicle to be transferred is described as follows:
1994 Chevrolet 1/2 ton Astro Van
Respectfully submitted,
V.I.N 1GCDM1524RB207348
/jk
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
August 3, 1994
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
Rick Gomez, CommUnity Development Director
Karen McGuire-Emery, Associate Park Planner
APPROVALTO GRANTAN EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF GTE CALIFORNIA
INCORPORATED, FOR A PORTION OF PARCEL 3, PARCEL MAP NO.
11286, LOCATED AT MILLIKENAVENUE SOUTH OF BASELINE, AND
IN ADDITION, GRANT A BILL OF SALE FOR EQUIPMENT LOCATED
ON THE SITE IN FAVOR OF THE SAME .
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached
resolution granting the proposed easement for a portion of Parcel
3, Parcel Map No. 11286, and in addition grant the Bill of Sale for
equipment present on the site, all in favor of GTE California
Incorporated, and authorize the City Engineer to sign said
documents and the City Clerk to attest the same.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
When the subject parcel was acquired from Lewis Homes as the future
YMCA site, a pullbox and related conduit was present on the site.
Apparently installed as a part of Lewis Development, the City has
now been informed by GTE that the Company was never granted an
easement by Lewis to access the equipment nor had GTE acquired the
equipment for maintenance purposes.
GTE California Incorporated, is now soliciting the conveyance of
these facilities in order to release the City from any future
liability or obligation in connection with the maintenance. The
Grant of Easement and Bill of Sale will release the City from any
responsibility and will enable GTE to maintain service of the
equip ent.
Res ctf ly submitted,
velopment D' rector
RG: KME
Attachments:
Exhibit "A" - Grant of Easement
Exhibit "B" - Parcel Map No. 11286
Exhibit "C" - Bill of Sale
RESOLUTION NO. 94-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
THE GRANT OF EASEMENT FOR A PORTION OF PARCEL 3,
PARCEL MAP NO. 11286 AND GRANTING A BILL OF SALE
FOR EXISTING EQUIPMENT ALL IN FAVOR OF GTE
CALIFORNIA INCORPORATED, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY
ENGINEER TO SIGN SAID DOCUMENTS AND CITY CLERK TO
ATTEST THE SAME
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, has for its consideration a Grant of Easement in favor
of GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPORATED, for a portion of Parcel 3, Parcel
Map No. 11286, located at Milliken Avenue South of Baseline; and
WHEREAS, this easement will allow GTE access to equipment
on the subject property for maintenance purposes; and
WHEREAS, GTE has also requested that a Bill of Sale be
executed to release the City from future obligation and maintenance
of this equipment.
NOW THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE that an Easement be granted for a
portion of Parcel 3 of Parcel Map No. 11286, located at Milliken
Avenue South of Baseline (see Exhibit "A") on behalf of GTE
CALIFORNIA INCORPORATED, and a Bill of Sale be issued to the same
for ownership and maintenance purposes of existing equipment, and
the City Engineer is hereby authorized to sign said documents on
behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to
attest hereto.
Parcel Map No. 11286, P. M. 15'2/60-62
e~, eP
--~ ,- vvv v--m'v · VV--I' j~,
City Of Rortcho Cucamonge 0227'81 .,~ i
iT~Oate Area ,-.
Per. 3
4 ~'90 aC
Assesmr s Mop
Book 0227~,~ Page bl
UNDERGROUND 1 II 2
RECOR~NG REQUESTED BY
GTICNIfemlaLkW.~,,. I d
WHEN RECORDEDMNLTO
Diana Bean - CAB20NC
Englneer-OSP/RiShC-of-Way ASenC
870 N. MounCaln Avenue
Upland, CA 91786
GRANT OF EASEMENT
THE GRANTOR(S), CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a Municipal Corporation
herel:n/grant(s) to the GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPORATED, a corporation. hereinaftef referre~ to as GRANTEE its successors
and assigns, an easement to construct, use, maintain, operme, alto, arid to, ref~ir, ~ ancVor remove its facilities,
including urn~ergrourtd conduits, manholes, peclesta~ cal)les, wire and aPpurtenancet for the transmission of electric
energy for communic~__tLc~ and otPar ~Jq2n:nes o,, over, in. urt~er, across end No,g ~lI certain reel Iorof2eny situated in the
City of Rancho Cucsmonlla County of San Bernardino
The NortherZy 10.0 feet of the Westerly 30.0 feet of Parcel 3 of Parcel Map 11286, as
per Map recorded September 28, 1990, In Book 152, Pages 60 throuSh 62, inclusive, of
Parcel Maps in the Office of the San Bernardino County Recorder.
This leSal description was prepared pursuant to Section 8730(c) of the Business and
Professions Code.
THE GRANTEE its successors and assigns and their respective agent~ end employees, shall have the right of ingress to
and egress from said easement and every part thereof, at all times, for the pu~ of exercising the rights heroin granted
and shill hays the right to remove such growth as may endanger or interfell with the use of said essement Such dghts
shall be reasonably exemisld and the Glintel shaJl be liable for any damage negligenffi/doris I::}y it to the iiix}ve described
property,
RAN W.Q 10-519-94
Page1 of 2
17
BY:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF,, said Grantor(s) ha
GRANTORS:
CITY OF RA~CHO CUCA~ONGA, a
Municipal Corporation
executed this instrument this day of
BY:
,19
State of }
County of
to be the persoft(s) whole name(s) is/are subscdbed to the within inslrumenl and
acknowledged to me thai he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized
capacity(lee), and thai by his/her/their signalum(s) on the insmjment the person(s), or the
entily upon t}ehllf Of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
Signalum
C. AReZi~'Y CRANED BY 9GNER
[] eov~N,4mssee~ee~~
State of
County of }
to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged to me the he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized
capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their skgnature{s) on ~ instrument the person(s), or the
entity ~ behalf of which the petson(s) acte{L executed the instrument.
Signmum
R/W W.Q t0-51.9-94
Page2of2
18
BILL OF SALE
GTE California Incor~reted
BILL OF SALE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA ,
Name a Municipal Corporation
10500 Civic Center Drive
Addmss Rancho CucamonBa, CA 91729
Name
Addres~
hereina~ermferredmasGranmr(s), brvaJuereceived, hemi~ysell(s)andconvey(s)toGTECALiFORN~ INCORPORATE~
a corPormjon, imsucc___,Meors_andm~n& mlright, ti~eandintereetintelephone pmpertyiocated
East side of Millikan Avenue south of Baseline and notch
of Church Street Z826' (Parcel 3, Parcel ~ap 11286, Book
L52, Pagas 60-62).
Saidtele~onelNoPertyiemoreparticul&-tyillumratedonDrawing(s) "A" dated 2116194
WorkOcdlfNo. 5Ig-3POOIFV ,atmchedhereloandrnadeaparthereof."As-builf'drawin~refiecting~rmjproj~
deign will be ~ evilliNe to you upon request.
Said telephone properly consiam of all or any pet of the ~lowin~ facilities I~aced by me Grantor(s) ~q the above described
for communication purlx~e&
Said Grantor(N hereby warrant(s) all title and interest herein conveyed, thai he is/are the owner(s) of
the telephone Property co~qv/yed with MI right to convey, that said tNepilone prop/fly Ls fme of encumbranc~, and ~at GTE
CAUFORNIA INCORPORATED shall have quiet enjoyment of said ~ property.
IN WITNESSWHEREORsaidGranto~Nh~ causedffi~instrument~beexecutedmle
,19 . dayof
GRANTOR
CITZ 0F RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
a Municipal Corporation
BY:
GTE Cailfemls Inc~';~ati d
By
DIANE BEAN
~tle [nB~neer-0SP. Ri~bt_of_W&3r Agent
BY:
State of } ~ CLAIMED BY SIGNER
County of
On before me, (name, ~ of omce~),
to bl thl I~r~m(I) whosl names) i8/ar~ sul~cribed to the within instrument and
caplcfiy(i~l), Ind ~ by hlWh~r/ffi~ir ~nalurl($) on th~ inamJment th~ 10~8~n($), or th~
entity upofi ~ of which the p~,~m(s) acted, executed the instrimmest,
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
August 3, 1994
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
Jerry B. Fulwood, Deputy City Manager
APPROVAL OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY'S SCHEDULE "A" FOR
LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES FOR THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA IN THE AMOUNT OF $8,006,269
RECOMMENDATION
Approval of Schedule "A" for Law Enforcement Services in the amount of $8,006,269 for
fiscal year 1994/95.
The City of Rancho Cucamonga is in receipt of Schedule "A" for Law Enforcement Services
for the City of Rancho Cucamonga for Fiscal Year 1994/95. Schedule A is the financial
portion of the contract which is included as part of the budgetary process. Therefore, staff
recommends that City Council approve Schedule A as a component part of the contract for
law enforcement services.
Deputy City Manager
JBF:dk
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY
SUBJECT:
August 3, 1994
Mayor and Members of the City 'Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
Don Gentry, Maintenance Supervisor
APPROVAL TO EXECUTE AN EXTENSION OF THE AGREEMENT FOR THE
LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION MAINTENANCE CONTRACT FOR LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS i AND 5, WITH LANDSCAPE WEST, INCORPORATED
OF ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA IN THE AMOUNT OF $170,751.24 TO BE FUNDED
BY: LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 1, FUND 40-4130-6028
($170,254.68) AND LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 5, FUND
44-4130-6028 {$496.56).
RECOI~ENDATION
It is recomnended that the City Council approve and execute an extension of
the agreement with Landscape West, Incorporated, of Anaheim, California for
the Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance Contract for Landscape Maintenance
Districts I and 5.
BACKGROUMD/ANALYSIS
The City Council previously awarded the contract on September 27, 1990, to
Landscape West, Incorporated. The contract was renewable yearly through June
30, 1994. The contract has been amended so that it may be negotiated and
extended on a year-to-year basis beginning July 1, 1994. Consequently,
negotiations with Landscape West, Incorporated have resulted in a price
structure for the fiscal year 1994/95, which will increase by 2.5 percent, the
maintenance costs for the Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance Contract For
Landscape Maintenance Districts I and 5, locations over the 1993/94' costs.
The amounts have been budgeted in the 94/95 fiscal year budget. Staff
informally contacted other contractors regarding prices for this work. All
indications are that the costs are competitive and reasonable.
Respectfully submitted,
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WjO:DG:ly
Y
21
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY
SUBJECT:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
August 3, 1994
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
Don Gentry, Maintenance Supervisor
APPROVAL TO EXECUTE AN EXTENSION OF THE AGREEMENT FOR THE LANDSCAPE
AND IRRIGATION MAINTENANCE CONTRACT FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT 2 (VICTORIA) AND LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 4 (TERRA
VISTA) CONTRACT WITH LANDSCAPE WEST, INCORPORATED OF ANAHEIM,
CALIFORNIA IN THE AMOUNT OF $596,619.72 TO BE FUNDED BY: LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 2, FUND 41-4130-6028 ($469,524.72) AND
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 4, FUND 43-4130-6028 ($127,095.00)
RECOI~DATIOM
It is reconmnended that the City Council approve and execute an extension of the
agreement with Landscape West, Incorporated, of Anaheim, California for the
Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance Contract for Landscape Maintenance District
2 (Victoria) and Landscape Maintenance District 4 (Tetra Vista).
BACKGROU IO/ANALYSI S
The City Council previously awarded the contract on September 27, 1990, to
Landscape West, Incorporated. The contract was renewable yearly through June 30,
1994. The contract has been amended so that it may be negotiated and extended on
a year-to-year basis beginning July 1, 1994. Consequently, negotiations with
Landscape West, Incorporated have resulted in a price structure for the fiscal
year 1994/95, which will increase by 2.5%, the maintenance costs for Landscape
Maintenance District 4, and Landscape Maintenance District 2. These costs have
been budgeted in the 94/95 fiscal year budget. Staff informally contacted other
contractors regarding prices for this work. All indications are that the costs
are competitive and reasonable.
Respectfully submitted,
William J. O~L'~'''~
City Engineer
WJO:DG:ly
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY
SUBJECT:
Augdst 3, 1994
Mayor and Members of the City.Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William j. O'Neil, City Engineer
Don Gentry, Maintenance Supervisor
APPROVAL TO EXECUTE AN EXTENSION OF THE AGREEMENT FOR THE
LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION MAINTENANCE CONTRACT FOR THE GENERAL
FUND PARKWAYS AND LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS 3A AND 3B WITH
MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENTERPRISES, INCORPORATED OF IRWINDALE,
CALIFORNIA IN THE ~V4OUNT OF $210,497.28 TO BE FUNDED BY:
GENERAL FUND 01-4647-6028 ($148,309.80), LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT 3A, FUND 42-4130-6028 (1,183.44) AND LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 3B, FUND 46-4130-6028 ($61,004.04).
RF'COI~IENDATION
It is reco~ended that the City Council approve and execute an extension of
the agreement with Mariposa Horticultural Enterprises, Inc., of Irwindale
California for the Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance Contract for The
General Fund Parkways and Landscape Maintenance Districts 3A and 3B.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
The City Council previously awarded the contract on September 27, 1990, to
Mariposa Horticultural Enterprises, Inc. The contract was renewable yearly
through June 30, 1994. The contract has been amended so that it may be
negotiated and extended on a year-to-year basis beginning July 1, 1994.
Consequently, negotiations with Mariposa Horticultural Enterprises,
Incorporated, have resulted in a price structure for the fiscal year 1994/95,
which will increase by 2.5 percent, the maintenance costs for the Landscape
and Irrigation Maintenance Contract for the General Fund Parkways and
Landscape Maintenance Districts 3A and 3B, locations over the 1993/94 cost.
The amounts have been budgeted in the 94/95 fiscal year budget. Staff
informally contacted other contractors regarding prices for this work. All
indications are that the costs are competitive and reasonable.
City Engineer
WJO:DG:ly
Y
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
August 3, 1994
Mayor, and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William j. O'Neil, City Engineer
Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspector
APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION FOR TRACT 13753,
LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF ELLENA STREET, NORTH OF BASE LINE
ROAD, SUBMITTED BY LEWIS HOMES
RECOII4ENDATION
It is reconmnended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution,
accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing the
Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the
construction of the public improvements for Tract 13753 were approved by
the City Council on August 6, 1992, in the following amounts:
Faithful Performance Bond: $483,089
Labor and Material Bond: $241,545
The developer, Lewis Homes, is requesting approval of a 12-month extension
on said improvement agreement due to slow economic conditions. Copies of
the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's
Office.
Respectful ly
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WjO:SMG:ly
Attachments
Y
Lewis Homes Management Corp.
1156 North Mountain Avenue / P.O. Box 670 / Upland, California 91785-0670
909/985 -0971 FAX: 909/949-6700
June 29, 1994
Mr. Steve Gilliland
Community Development Dept.
Engineering Division
City of Rancho Cucamonga
P.O. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729
Re: IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION - TERRA VISTA TRACT 13753
Dear Steve:
Enclosed please find our request for extension of the subject
agreement along with a check in the amount of $251.00 to cover the
fee.
We are requesting a twelve month extension due to soft market
conditions and slow sales.
Thank you for considering this request and for your assistance.
Sincerely,
· LEWIS HOMES MANAGEMENT CORP.
Maxine Bignell
Project Development
emb\003
enclosures
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13753
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension
executed on August 3, 1994, by Lewis Homes as developer, for the improvement
of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described
therein, and generally located on the north side of Ellena Street, north of
Base Line Road; and
WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said
Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in
conjunction with the development of said Tract 13753; and
WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and
accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified
in said Improvement Agreement Extension.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said
Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is
hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto.
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
August 3, 1994
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspector~
ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS, AND RELEASE OF SECURITY FOR
TRACT 12895, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF BAKER STREET,
SOUTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD
RECOIe4ENDATION:
The required street improvements for Tract 12895 have been completed in
an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that City Council accept said
improvements, and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful
Performance Letter of Credit in the amount of $118,000.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
Tract 12895 - located on the west side of Baker Street, south of Foothill
Boulevard
Release:
DEVELOPER:
Rancho Citiland Development
c/o Environmental Control Systems
P.O. Box 5
Glendora, CA 91740
Faithful Performance Letter of Credit (Private Streets) $118,000
Respectfully S~~
William J. O'
City Engineer
WjO:SMG:ly
Attachment
Y
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS
FOR TRACT 12895
WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tract 12895
have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted.
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
· August 3, 1994
Mayor, and Members of the .City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William j. O'Neil, City Engineer
Steve M. Gilltland, Public Works Inspecto[/~
RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND FOR TRACT 13858,
LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF MILLIKEN AVENUE AND
BANYAN STREET
RECOIeeENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to
release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
The required one year maintenance period has ended and the street
improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship.
DEVELOPER:
Brock Homes
23382 Mill Creek Dr. #130
Laguna Hills, CA 92653
Release:
Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $26,274
Respectful ly submitted,
William J O' e ~~
. Ni
City Engineer
WJO:SMG:ly
Y
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY
SUBJECT:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
August 3, 1994
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
Will Jam J. O'Neil, City Engineer
Michael D. Long, Supervising Public Works Inspector
ACCEPT THE ATHLETIC FIELD LIGHTING TOUCH PAD SYSTEMS, LOCATED AT
RED HILL COMMUNITY PARK AND HERITAGE COMMUNITY PARK, CO 94-018,
AS COMPLETE, RELEASE THE BONDS AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER
TO FILE A "NOTICE OF COMPLETION"
REC~NDATION
It is recommended that City Council accept the Athletic Field Lighting Touch
Pad Systems, located at Red Hill Community Park and Heritage Community Park,
CO 94-018, as complete, authorize the City to file a "Notice of Completion",
release the Cash Performance Bond in the amount of $50,116.00. Also, approve
the final contract amount of $57,941.00.
BAD(GROUND/ANALYSIS
The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans
and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The final
contract amount, based on project documentation, is $57,941.00 which includes
no contract change orders.
Respectful 1 y submitted,
William J. O'Ne~~
City Engineer
WJO:MDL:dlw
Y
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF .RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS
FOR ATHLETIC FIELD LIGHTING TOUCH PAD SYSTEMS, LOCATED AT
RED HILL COMMUNITY PARK AND HERITAGE COMMUNITY PARK, CO
94-018, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Athletic Field
Lighting Touch Pad Systems, located at Red Hill Co,~unity Park and Heritage
Community Park, CO 94-18, have been completed to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer; and
WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying
the work complete.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is
authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of
San Bernardino County.
31
ORDINANCE NOo 528
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA ADOPTING DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT NO. 94-02,
AMENDING THE DEVELOPMENT CODE TO STREAMLINE THE
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCESS, AND MODIFYING THE LAND USE
REGULATIONS FOR COMMERCIAL/OFFICE DISTRICTS, AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF.
A, Recitals.
1. The purpose and intent of this Ordinance is to streamline the
review process for various development permits. The Development Code of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga currently provides regulations for land use and the
review of new development permits. Prior to the adoption of this Ordinance,
this Council has had available and reviewed a detailed study prepared by a
consultant with respect to the development review process. The general
summary of the study is that the customers (developers, business owners,
homeowners, etc. ) are concerned with the length of time required to complete
the process. This Council hereby finds and declares its intent:
a. That the review process should be simplified without
compromising the quality of development.
b. To create greater efficiency in the process to allow the
Planing Commission to focus on broader policy issues.
c. To maintain a process that is timely, fair, and thorough.
2. On June 8, 1994, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing concerning the above
referenced Development Code Amendment and, following the conclusion thereof,
adopted its Resolution No. 94-49, recommending that the City Council of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga adopt these amendments.
3. On July 20, 1994, the Council conducted and concluded a duly
noticed public hearing concerning the subject amendments to the Development
Code.
4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance
have occurred.
E. Ordinance.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as
follows:
SECTION 1: The City Council hereby specificall~ finds tha~ all of
the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and
correct.
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO.
DCA 94-02 - STREAMLINING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCESS
July 20, 1994
Page 2
- SECTION 2. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby
finds that this amendment is established and adopted to protect and promote
the public health, safety, morals, comfort, convenience, welfare;' and more
particularly;
1. To implement the goals and objectives of the General Plan and to
guide and manage the future growth of the City in accordance with such plan;
2. To protect the physical, social, and economic stability of
commercial, office and other land uses within the City to assure its orderly
and beneficial development;
$
3. To reduce hazards to the public resulting from the inappropriate
location, use, or design of buildings, and other improvements; and
4. To attain the physical, social, and economic advantages
resulting from comprehensive and orderly land use and resource planning.
SECTION 3. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby
finds that the project has been prepared and reviewed in compliance with the
California Environmental Quality act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines
promulgated thereunder, and further, specifically finds that, based upon
substantial evidence, it can be seen with certainty that there is not
possibility that the proposed Ordinance will have a significant effect on the
environment and therefore, the proposed Ordinance is exempt pursuant to State
CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 (b) (3).
SECTION 4. Section 17.02.050 is hereby amended to add a new
subsection 6 to read as follows:
Authority. The City Planner shall exercise that authority set
forth in ~overnment Code 65900 et Is{l. and as set forth
hereafter·
SECTION 5.
read as followsz
Section 17.02,100, subsection B, is hereby amended to
Be
Extensions. An extension may be X~d grantmt by the City
Planner for lapse of approval for projects described in the
previous subsection. ~¢~*~Z~ ~¢~XX~ ~¢~g~ ~ ~ ¢~g~
~X~X~/ Extensions may be granted in twelve (12) month
increments and not to exceed a total of four (4) years from the
original date of approval, unless otherwise ~revi~e~ for hy
state law. All requests for extensions should be filed with the
City Planner as least ~X~ f~; thirty (30) days prior to the
expiration date. The City Planner ~. ~X~ ~JX~X~ may
extend the approval of a project if ~M~ he finds that there ~
have been no significant changes in the Land Use Element,
Development Code, or other applicable specific/community plan,
character of the area within which the project is located, or
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO.
DCA 94-02 - STREAMLINING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCESS
July 20, 1994
Page 3
current planning iM}licy or past practice that would cause the
approved project to become inconsistent or non-conforming.
Also, ~M~ granting of an extension should not be detrimental to
the safety or welfare or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity. If the Cit~ Planner finds that
there is significant change, the Cit~ Planner shall refer the
extension request to the Plan~ing Commission for consideration.
SECTION 6. Section 17.02.110 shall be amended to read as follows:
Section 17.02.110
Public Hearinos and Notification
General. A public hearing shall be held prior to action by the
City Planner, Planning Commission, or City Council in any of the
following cases. These public hearings are conducted in order
to encourage public participation and discussion·
1. Any change in the text of this title and/or General Plan·
2. Any change in the District Map.
3. As specifically required by state law (i.e., tentative
tract and parcel map, conditional use permits, variances).
As determined necessary or desirable by the City Planner,
Commission, and/or Council upon the adoption of a
resolution setting the time and place for a public hearing.
5. Apartments and/or multi-family projects of four (4) units
or more.
Authority to Notice Hearinos. The City Planner is hereby
authorized to advertise and to notice a public hearing as
provided in this part for the Planning Commission or Cit~
Planner and the City Clerk for the Council when required by this
title or when such hearing is considered desirable or necessary
in order to carry out the purpose of this title.
C. Notice of Filino.
Standard Notice Reauirement. At such time as an
application for a project which requires a public hearing
before the City Planner or the Planning Commission is
deemed complete for processing, the City Flanner shall
cause notices.to be posted conspicuously on the project
site not more than 300 feet apart along project perimeter
frontinS on improved public streets. Each notice shall
contain a general description of the project and a copy of
any proposed subdivision map or site plan. Such notices
shall have the following title in lettering not less than
one (1) inch in height: "NOTICE OF FILING."
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO.
DCA 94-02 - STREAMLINING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCESS
July 20, 1994
Page 4
2. Supplemental Notice Recuirements.
ADDliCabilitV: In addition to standard requirements,
large 4-foot by 8-foot sign or signs shall be required
to be posted at the project site for development
related projects in any one of the following
circumstances:
(1)
The proposed development is an infill project
with a higher intensity land use than that of
the existing neighborhood; or,
(2) The proposed infill project requires a General
Plan land use amendment; or,
(3) The proposed infill project requires an EIR; or,
(4)
As determined to be necessary and desirable by
the City Planner based on the nature of the
proposed project. For large projects, the City
Planner may determine that more than one sign ks
necessary.
The purpose of the supplemental large sign notice requirement is
to notify the community and the neighbors in the affected area
early in the review process, allowing the applicant and the City
the benefit of citizens' comments during the initial stages of
project review.
If it is determined upon initial submittal that a large, 4-foot
by 8-foot notification sign(s) is necessary, the applicant shall
be notified of required sign bonding fees and sign permit filing
requirements within 30 days as part of the City's Notice of
Complete Application. A $500 cash deposit is required to ensure
compliance with the supplemental notification requirements
including maintenance and removal of the large notification
sign. The project application shall no~ be deemed complete
until the large sign is installed and required cash deposit
made.
be
Sion Criteria/Maintenance. In order to implement the
large signs as an effective form of public
notification, the following rules and standards shall
apply~
(1)
elan Size and SPecifications. All large sign(s)
shall be four feet by eight feet (4' x 8') in
size and be constructed to the specifications of
Figure 1. The specific project information text
on the sign shall be provided by the Planning
Division.
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO.
DCA 94-02 - STREAMLINING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCESS
July 20, 1994
Page 5
(2)
Location and Installation Standards. All large
sign(s) shall be installed according to the
specifications of Figure 2. The location for
the sign(s) on the project site shall be
determined by the City Planner.
(3)
Timing. All large notification sign(s) shall be
installed by the applicant at the project site
in accordance with the above criteria. Once the
project application is deemed complete and all
notification sign(s) installed per City
standards, the project will be scheduled for
Design and Development Review Committee
meetings.
(4)
Sign Removal and Maintenance· All large sign(s)
must be kept adequately maintained and remain in
place until the final decision on the
application has been made or the application is
withdrawn. All large sign(s) shall be removed
by the applicant within fourteen (14} days of
the final decision or date of withdrawal.
Failure to remove the sign within the prescribed
period may result in forfeiture of the cash
deposit and removal of the sign by the City.
Notice of Mearin~. At least ten (10) days before the public
hearing of a project requiring a publio hearing, the City
Planner shall cause notice of the time and place of the publio
hearing on the project to be given in the following manner:
By publication once in TM~ ~Z~ ~ The Inland Valley
Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation within
the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
By mail or delivery to all persons, including businesses,
corporations or other public or private entities, shown on
the last equalized assessment roll as owning real property
within 300 feet of the property which is the subject of the
project.
By posting notices conspicuously on the project site not
more than 300 feet apart along project perimeter fronting
on improved public streets· Each posted notice shall
contain a general description of the project and a copy of
any proposed subdivision map or site plan· Said posted
notices shall have the following title and lettering not
less than one (1) inch in height: "PLANNING COMMISSION
HEARING" or "PUBLIC HEARING."
4. Supplemental Notice Requirements. Additional public
notification beyond the standard 300-foot boundary shall be
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO.
DCA 94-02 - STREAMLINING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCESS
July 20, 1994
required for a development related project as determined by
the City Planner in any one of the following circumstances:
a. The proposed development is a residential infill
project with a higher intensity land use than that of
the existing neighborhood; or,
b. The proposed residential infill project requires a
General Plan land use amendment; or,
c. The proposed residential infill project requires an
EIR; or,
d. As determined to be necessary and desirable by the
City Planner based on the nature of the proposed
project.
In determining the boundaries of the expanded notification
area, the following criteria shall be used.
(a) The expanded area may be directly affected by the
proposed project due to proposed or established
circulation and drainage patterns, or access, view,
grading, or other similar considerations; or
(b) The expanded area is an integral part of the affected
neighborhood or subdivision.
If it is determined upon initial submittal that
supplemental notification is necessary, the applicant
shall be notified, within 30 days as part of the
City-'s Notice of Complete Application, of expanded
notification area to be included in the mailings, and
shall be required to submit three (3) sets of gummed
address labels based on the latest equalized tax
assessors rolls for the expanded area. The
application shall not be deemed complete until the
labels have been submitted.
E. Other Notice Reauirements. Notices required by this section
shall be in addition to any other or different notice required
by other provisions of this code or by state law, provided,
however, that nothing therein shall require separate notices to
be given if the same notice will satisfy the requirements of
this section and any other applicable section of this code or
state law.
F. Effect of Failure to Give Notice. No sation, inaction, or
reconmaendation regarding any project by the CAtr Planner,
Planning Commission, or City Council shall be held void or
invalid or be set aside by any Court by reason of any error or
omission pertaining to the notices, including the failure to
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO.
DCA 94-02 - STREAMLINING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCESS
July 20, 1994
Page 7
give' any notice required by this section, unless the Court after
an examination of the entire case shall be of the opinion that
the error or omission complained of was prejudicial, ahd that by
reason of such error or omission the party complaining or
appealing sustained and suffered substantial injury, and that a
different result would have been probable if such error or
omission had not occurred or existed. There shall be no
presumption that error or omission is prejudicial or that injury
was done if error or omission is shown.
SECTION 7.
as follows:
Section 17.04,030, subsection G, shall be amended to read
Revisions/Modifications. Revisions or modifications of
Conditional Use Permits can be requested by the applicant.
Further, the Planning Commission may periodically review, modify
or revoke a Conditional Use Permit.
Revisions/Modifications by applicant. A revision or
modification to an approved Conditional Use Permit such as,
but not limited to, change in conditions, expansions,
intensification, location, hours of operation, or change of
ownership, may be requested by an applicant. Such request
shall be processed as described in Sections 17.04.030-C
through F. The applicant shall supply necessary
information as determined by the City, to indicate reasons
for the requested change.
Periodic Review· ~ PX~X~ ~X~WX~/ The Planning
Commission may periodically review any Conditional Use
Permit to ensure that it is being operated in a manner
consistent with conditions of approval or in a manner which
is not detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare, or materially injurious to properties in the
vicinity· If, after review, the Commission deems that
there is sufficient evidence to warrant a full examination,
then a public hearing date shall be set.
Modification or Revocation. ~ ~M~ PX~X~e ¢~6~6~/
After setting a date for public hearing as described in
Subsection 2 above, the City Planner shall notify the
applicant and owners of the CUP in question. Such no=ice
shall be sent by certified mail and shall state that the
Commission will be reviewing the CUP for possible
modification or revocation. It shall also state the date,
time and place of hearing. The public hearing shall be
conducted and notice given in accordance with Section
17.02,110.
The City Planner shall fully investigate the evidence and
prepare a report for the Commission's consideration. Upon
conclusion of the public hearing, the Commission shall
render a decision to do one of the following measures:
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO.
DCA 94-02 - STREAMLINING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCESS
July 20, 1994
Page 8
ae
Find that the CUP is.being conducted in an appropriate
matter and that no action to modify or 'revoke is
necessary; or,
Find that the CUP is not being
appropriate manner and that
conditions are necessary; or,
conducted in an
modifications to
Find that the CUP is not being conducted in an
appropriate manner and that modifications are not
available to mitigate the impacts and therefore
revokes the permit which requires the operation to
cease and desist in the time allotted by
the Commission.
If the Planning Commission either modifies or revokes a
CUP, then they shall state reasons for such action within
the resolution.
New ADDliCatiOnS foliowind Denial or Revocation. Following the
denial or revocation of a Conditional Use Permit application, no
application for a Conditional Use Permit for the same or
substantially the same use of the same or substantially the same
site shall be filed within one year from the date of denial or
revocation.
SECTION 8. Section 17.04,035 is hereby added to read as follows:
Section 17.04,035
Ae
Non-Construction Conditional Use Permits
Authority Where there is no exterAor construction involved, the
City Planer is authorized to grant or deny Conditional Use
Permits in accordance with the procedure in Section 17.04,030
and impose reasonable conditions. If in the opinion of the City
Planner the application involves unusual requirements or raises
questions of land use policy substantially sore significant than
generalIT pertain to such application, the City Planner may
refer the application to the Planning Commission for
consideration.
Public Hearing. The City Planner shall hold · public hearing on
each aPplication for a Non-Construction Conditional Use
Permit. The hearing and notice shall be set and notice shall be
given as prescribed in Section 17.02,110 Public Hearings.
Revisions/Modifications, Revisions or modifications-'of Non-
Construction Conditional Use Permits can be requested by the
applicant and approved or denied by the City Planner. Further,
the City Planner may periodically review, modify or revoke a
Non-Construction Conditional Use Permit in accordance with the
procedures of Sections 17.04.030.O.
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO.
DCA 94-02 - STREAMLINING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCESS
July 20, 1994
Page 9
SECTION 9.
read as follows:
Section 17.06.010, subsection C, is hereby amended to
C. Authority
Plannina Commission Review: Development/Design Review
applications which meet any of the following criteria shall
require review and consideration by the Planning
Commission:
~/
¢1
(a)
Any project being proposed along a Special Boulevard
as defined by the General Plan, except for structures
within projects with an approved tRIter plan as
provided for in subsection (b) below.
(b)
All projects which are tRster planed. Once the
tRster plan, including architectural guidelines, has
been approved by the Planning Commission, individual
structures may be approved by the City Planer.
(c) All residential subdivisions.
(d)
All shopping centers, except individual structures tRy
be approved by the City Planer where a tRster plan,
including architectural guidelines, has been approved
by the Planning Commission.
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO.
DCA 94-02 - STREAMLINING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCESS
July 20, 1994
Page 10
(e)
(f)
(g)
Any project requiring an EnvironmentaI Impact Report
(EIR) or Environmental Impact Statement (ElSe.
All projects of more than ten (10) acres of land.
Certain projects within a hillside area are subject to
review pursuant to Section 17.24.020.S.
The Planning Commission is authorized to approve or deny
applications and to impose reasonable conditions upon such
approval, subject to the right of appeal. Conditions may
include, but shall not be limited to requirements for open
spaces, screening and buffering of adjacent properties,
fences, and walls; requirements for installation and
maintenance of landscaping and erosion control measures;
requirements for street improvements and dedications,
regulation of vehicular ingress and egress, and traffic
circulation; regulation of signs; regulation of hours or
other characteristics of operation; requirements for
maintenance of landscaping and other improvements;
establishment for maintenance of landscaping and other
improvements; establishment of development schedules or
time limits for performance or completion; and such other
conditions as the Commission may deem necessary to ensure
compatibility with surrounding uses, to preserve the public
health, safety, and welfare, and to enable the Commission
to make the findings required by Section 17.06.020-F.
City Planner Review= Development/Design Review
applications which do not require Planning Commission
review as described above shall be subject to review and
approval by the City Planner. Although, if in the opinion
of the City Planner the application involves unusual site
development requirements or unique operating
characteristics, or raises questions of development policy
substantially more significant than generally pertain to
applications for development review and which require
Planning Commission consideration, the City Planner may
refer the application to the Planning Commission.
The City Planner may, contingent upon environmental
clearance by the Planning Commission, grant approval or
grant approval in a modified form or subject to conditions,
or may deny the application. Conditions may include, but
shall not be limited to; requirements for open spaces,
screening and buffering of adjacent properties, fences and
walls; requirements for installation and maintenance of
landscaping and erosion control measures; requirements for
street improvements and dedications, regulation of
vehicular ingress, egress, and traffic circulation;
regulation of signs; regulation of hours or other
41
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO.
DCA 94-02 - STREAMLINING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCESS
July 20, 1994
Page 11
characteristics of operation; requirements for maintenance
of landscaping and other improvements; establishment of
development schedules or time limits for performance or
completion; and such other conditions as the City Planner
may deem necessary to insure compatibility with surrounding
uses, to preserve the public health, safety, and welfare,
and to enable the City Planner to make the findings
required by Section 17.06.0~10-F.
The ~*~X~/ Technical, Design, and Grading Review
Committees are hereby established to be advisory to the
Planning Commission and the City Planner.
SECTION 10. Section 17.06.010, subsection E, second paragraph, is
hereby amended to read as follows:
E.I. DeveloPment/Design Review Procedure
2.II. All development proposals submitted pursuant to this
Section are initially reviewed by the ~*~Z~IiS'~J
Technical, Design, and Grading Committees: (1) Design
Review Committee - architecture and site planning; (2}
Grading Committee - grading and drainage; and (3)
~*~Z~ Technical Review Committee - compliance with
technical code requirements. Each committee shall make a
recommendation on each project for consideration by the
Planning Commission or City Planner, if applicable.
SECTION 11. Section 17.10.030, Table 17.10,030 Use Regulations For
Commercial/Office Districts, subsections A through E, are hereby amended to
read in words and figures as set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and
hereby incorporated by reference.
SECTION 12.
read as follows:
Section 17.04,050, subsection D, is hereby amended to
Notification. The City Planner shall notify the applicant and
contiguous property owners and other interested parties by
~~ mail ten (10) days prior to the ~ ~X~X~e decision
Mloo~ B~cep~ion re~uest. Said notice shall state the following:
1. Requested action
2, Location of requested action
3. Name and address (parcel and lot number) of applicant
4. Date after which a decision will be made on application
5. Name of City Planner and telephone number of City Hall.
r,lm" lr At
Section 17.10.030
General Commercial District (GCh This district is intended for general
commereial activities and services of a more intensive nature. These uses would
be located primarily along major transportation routes and would include major
shopping facilities, major service-oriented uses, major financial end corixrate
headquarters which are designed to serve the City or the region as a whole.
SeeUoe 17.10.030
Use liestam-.tires
Uses listed in Table 17.10.030 shall be allowable in one or more of the commercial
districts as indicated in the columns beneath each commercial district. Where indicated
with the letter "P", the use shall be a permitted use in that district. Where indicated
with the letter "C", the use shall be a conditional use subject to the Conditional Use
Permit process. In the event there is difficulty in eategoeizir~ a given use in one of the
districts, the procedure m}utlined in Section 17.02,040 shall be followed,
TABI~ 17.10.030 1381 REGULATION8 FOR COMMERCIAL/OFFICE DIBTRICrS
USE OP NC
A. Offices and Related Uses
1. Administrative and executive offices. p p p
2. Artist anti photographic studios, not P p p
ineluding the sale of equipment or
supplies.
3. Clerical and professional offices. p p p
4. Financial services and institutions/./~/c~ p p p
5. Medical, dental and related health P p p
services (non-animal related) including
laboratories end clinics; only the sale of
articles clearly incidental to the services
provided shall be {;~rmitted,
Prescription pharmacies, (also when
located within a buildinl contalrting the
offices of 5 ce more me<Heal praetitionees)
Public buildings (i~, city and county
buildings, special districts end post
office).
P P P
P P P
8. Public utility service offices.
P P P
9. PubUe safety facility (police,
amlNlanee and param.dies).
fire, C C C
Section 17.10.030
10.
Related commercial uses (blueprintinS,
stationary, quick copy, etc.) when
incidental to an office buildinS or
complex.
General Commercial Uses
1. Antique shops
,
Adult busines~ (see special requirements
per Section 17.10.030)
OP NC GC
P P P
P P
- C
Animal Care Facility (animal hospital,
veterinarian, eommereial kennel,
grooming).
(a) Excluding exterior kennel, pens, or
(b) Including exterior kennel, pens, or
rul]~
4. Apparel stores,
5. Art, music and photographic studios and
supply stores.
6. AppUance stores and repajr.
7. Arcades (see special requirements per
Section 17.10.030 F.)
8. Athletic and Health Club, gyms and
weight reducing ,Units.
9. Automotive .~sc~ervtees (including
motorcycles, boats, trailer and camper)
(a) s ee
(b) rentals
(C)
ret:~rs (miFd. ~,ngi~le work, muffler
s~ p~nti~ ~ work ~d
upho~t~)
(d) Coin-op washing
(e) Automatic washing
C P p
C
P P
P P
/¢'~' p
C C
P P P
~C
C
C C C
C C C
Seation I.T.L0.03L1
OP NC GC
C C P
(f)
Service or gasoline dispensing
stations (including minor repair
such as tune-ups, brakes, batteries,
tires, mufflers)
10.
(g) Parts and supplies \ _
· --, ,: ~.:- ,..~ ~,~,-. c~j ~ ...-~..-o ~r.~e:/..
Be~keries (retail only). _
ll. Barber and beauty shops.
P
12. Bicycle shops.
P
13. Blueprint and photocopy services
~-I 1. ;a-_t ~n er s viec3.
15. Book, gift and stationary stores (other
than adult related material).
16. Candy stores and confectionaries.
17. Catering establishments.
18. Cleaning and pressing establishments.
19. Carpenter shop or cabinet shop.
20. Cocktail lounge (be, lounge, tavern)
including related entertainment.
(a) Operated independent of
restaurant
a
C
(b) Aecemory to a restaurant
P P
_ ~
P P
P P
P P
P P
21. Commereiai recreation facilities.
(a) Indoor uses. such am bowling,
theaters, billiards, e+¢.
P P
(b)
Outdoor uses such as Soft, tennis,
basketball, baseball, trampolines,
etc.
P P
- p
P P
- p
2. COn'tractor/
stora~,elrequi~..
23. Dairy product stores.
C
C C C
C C P
C C C
P P
Seation Z7.10.030
l~ag OP
24. De. gartment stores. -
25. Drive-in businesses, includir~ theaters. -
(otl~er than rut rood restaurants)
26. Drug stores and pharmacies.
21. Equipment rental yards. ~;0,, _
28. Fsst-i'ood restaurants * C
29. Feed/Tack stores -
30. Florist shops, p
31, Food stores and supermarkets, -
32, Furniture store, repair and upholstery. -
33, General retail store. -
34. Hardware stores, -
35. Home improvement centers,
(a)Material stored and soId within
enclosed buildings
(b) Outdoor storqe of material such as -
lumber & buildin~ mateHi
36. Hotels and Motels,
31. lee Machines (outdoor), -
38. Jarlitor~l sarviees and supplies, j~/-
39. Jewelry stores, -
40. Laundry-self-service. -
41. Liquor stores, -
42. Kiosks for key shops, trim drop~ etc. in -
parkin~ lots,
43° Locksmith sho~o -
44, Mini-stors~s for public use (no outdoor -
storqe).
NC GC
- p
C C
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
C
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
C
P
P
P
P
P
C
Seation 17.10.030
USli
45. Moctuaries and cemeteries.
6~.~/':~'Otoreyn!.s salts aR-! -~erviee.~
47. Newspaper and magazine stores, Fintins
an~l p-hli~hin6._
48. NurserieS and Carden supply stores;
provided, in the NC district,
equipment, supplieS and material are kept
within an enclosed area~
49, Office and business machine storeS.
50. Parkinl facilitieS (commercial) where fees
are charled.
51. Political or philanthropic headqusrters.
,.op: .............
53. Plumbir~ shop and supplies.
54. Photocopy
Printir~ shops.
Restaurants (other than fast food).
(a) With entertainment and/o~ seevi.-W
of aleoMU~ ksav£r,~u c~l,~,l
(b) Incidental sarvinl of beer and wine
but without a cocktail lounie, bar,
entertainment or danein~
Reereationtt Vehicle Storqe Yard,
58. Shoe stores, sale and repair.
59. Seeon<l-hand stores and pawn shops.
60. Shoppinl Cente~ subject to provisions in
Section 17.10,030-IL5.
61. Spiritumll-t readings or astrology
forecasting.
62. Sportin~ foods stores.
63. Stamp and coin shops.
OP NC GC
C C C
- _ ~
- p
/F P
P
C
P
P P
P
C
P
P
P
P
P
P
P3
P
P
P
~o/C
P
C __~
P
P
C
P
P
P
Section :T.L ),):-~0
USE OP NC GC
64. Swimming pool supplies. - p p
65,' Tailor. _ p p
66. Taxidermists. _ _ p
69. Toy stores.
70. Travel agencies.
71. Transportation facilities (train
taxi depots).
and bus,
72. Truck and trailer rental, sales and service.
73. Variety stores.
~~hieUlm-StOts~s% yard --,,o towing met vlc~.
Public and semi-public uses
- C
P P
Day Care Facilities
Convalescent ratjUries
Private and public clu~ ~d l~g~,
ineludi~ YMCA, YWCA ~d ~mil~ youffi
gmup ~es.
C C C
c. - c.
C C C
Educational institutions, parochial, private
(including colleges and universities),
C C C
5. Libraries & museums, public or private.
6. Parks and recreation facilities, public or
private.
7. Public utility installations.
C C C
8. Vocational or business trade schools.
C C C
9. Churches, convents, monasteries and other
religious institutions.
C C C
Section 17.10.030
De
Accessory Uses
1. Acessory structures and uses eustomarHy
incidental to a permitted use and
contained on the same site.
2. Accessory structures and uses eustomarily
incidental to a conditional use and
contained on the same site.
Caretakers residence
Devices, per Section
4. Amusement
17.10,030-P.
Temporary Uses
Temporary uses as prescribed in Section
17.04,070 and subject to those provisions.
OP NC GC
P P P
C C C
~ ~ P
P P P
2. Temporary office modules, subject to C C C
provisions in Suet, on 17.10.030-P.4.
Special Use Refrulations
Adult Businesses. In consideration of spinrevel of any adult business, u
defined in Chapter 17.02, a Conditional Use Permit shall be approved for an
adult business in the GC District subjent to all the standard development
requirements unless
(a)
(b)
Such business is located within 1,000 feet of a eelleg· or ~miversity, ·
pubUe or private.educational facility, a church, a park or recreational
facility, · library, a pest offfee, or a governmental institution.
Such business is located less than 1,000 feet of any other adult
(c)
8ueh business is lee·ted less than 1,000 feet from any property in ·
residenUn, zone cr within 1,000 feet of any grow of 5 or more
dwellings in any other zone.
e
Amusement Devices, The use ot amusement devices, as defined in Chapter
17.02, as an accessory use to a permitted use, shall be regulated based on the
foGowing criteria,
No more than three (3) devices, but not to exceed five percent (5%) of
the public flocr area, may be permitted per business without oPt}roval
of · conditional use permit, Each machine and playing ares occupies
· minimum of ten (10) square feet,
ORDINANCE NOo 529
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC
PLAN AMENDMENT 94-03, AMENDING THE LAND USE TYPES, LAND
USE TYPE DEFINITIONS, AND THE LAND USES WITHIN VARIOUS
SUBAREAS, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF.
A. Recitals.
1. The purpose and intent of this Ordinance is to streamline the
review process for certain land uses. The Industrial Area Specific Plan
currently provides regulations for the use of land. Prior to the adoption of
this Ordinance, this Council had available and reviewed a detailed study
prepared by a consultant with respect to the development review process. The
general summary of the study is that the customers (developers, business
owners, etc.) are concerned with the length of time required to complete the
process. This Council hereby finds and declares its intent:
a. That the review process should be simplified without
compromising the quality of the development.
b. To create greater efficiency in the process to allow the
Planning Commission to focus on brooder policy issues.
c. To maintain a process that is timely, fair, and thorough.
2. On June 8, 1994, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public: hearing concerning the above-
referenced amendment and, following the conclusion thereof, adopted its
Resolution No. 94-50, recommending that the City Council adopt these
amendments.
3. On July 20, 1994, the City Council conducted and concluded a
duly noticed public hearing concerning the subject amendments to the
Industrial Area Specific Plan.
4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance
have occurred.
S. Ordinance.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby ordain
as follows=
SECTION 1: The City Council hereby specifically finds that all of
the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A,, of this Ordinance are true and
correct.
SECTION 2: The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby
finds that this amendment is established and adopted to protect and promote
the public health, safety, morals, comfort, convenience, and welfare; and more
particularly:
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO.
ISPA 94-03 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
July 20, 1994
Page 2
1. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General
Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and
2. That the proposed amendment is consistent with the Development
Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and
3. That the proposed amendment does not conflict with the Land Use
Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the
district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related
development; and
4. That the proposed
environmental impact; and
amendment will have
no significant
5. That the proposed amendment is consistent with the objectives of
the Industrial Area Specific Plan.
SECTION 3: The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby
finds that the project has been prepared and reviewed in compliance with the
California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines
promulgated thereunder, and further, specifically finds that based upon
substantial evidence, it can be seen with certainty that there is no
possibility that the proposed Ordinance will have a significant effect on the
environment and, therefore, the proposed Ordinance is exempt pursuant to State
CEQA Guidelines, Section 15061 (b)(3).
SECTION 4: The Industrial Area Specific Plan text, Part III, Table
III-1 "Summary of Land Use Types by Subarea,- commencing on page III-5, is
hereby amended to read as attached, and all lists of permitted and
conditionally permitted uses in Part IV, Subarea Development Standards are
hereby amended accordingly.
SECTION 5: Par~ IIl, Table IZl-2, Subsection D, page 111-14, the
definition for "Entertainment- is hereby amended to read as follows:
Entertainment: Activities typically include, but
are not limited to: ~X~/ ~~X/ ~
entertainment services, excluding adult
enter~ainment, within an enclosed building to
assembled groups of spectators ~ or participants,
as well as activities typically performed at private
and non-profit clubs and lodges. Uses typically
include, but are not limited to: dance halls,
motion picture theaters, and meeting halls.
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO.
ISPA 94-03 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCA~ONGA
July 20, 1994
Page 3
SECTION 6: Part III, Table III-2, Subsection E, page III-16, is
hereby amended to add a new land use type to read as follows:
Convention Centers= Activities typically include,
but are not limited to, conferences, seminars,
product demonstrations, and tournaments within an
enclosed building for assembled groups or spectators
or participants. Uses typically include convention
centers and exhibition halls.
SECTION 7: Part III, Table III-2, Subsection E, page III-16, the
definition for "Cultural" is hereby amended to read as follows:
Cultural: Activities typically include, but are not
limited to, those performed by or at the following
institutions or installations:
- Public and private performing arts centers
(i.e., music, dance, drama) not including
nightclubs;
- Public and private ~~ museums and art
galleries;
- Public and private ~g~~ libraries and
observatories.
SECTION 8= Part Ill, Table 111-2, Subsaction D, page 111-11, the
definition for "Automotive Rental/Leasing" is hereby amended to read as
follows:
Automotive Rental/Z~i~4z Activities typically
include, but are not limited to: the rental ~,
~~ fr~n the premises of motor vehicles, with
provision of incidental maintenance services. Uses
~ypically include, but are not limited to, car
rental agencies ~ Z~e ~**~- On-site
storage ~, ~~ ~ .#~ ~¢ ~ ~, ~
shall not occupy more than 25 percent of the
required parking for the subject building suite,
unless approved with a Conditional Use Permit.
SECTION 9: Par= Ill, Table Ill-2, Subsection D, page 111-12, the
definition for "Automotive Sales' is hereby amended to read as follows:
Automotive Sales and Leasing: Activities typically
include, but are not limited to= the display,
~ sale, or leasing of new and used automobiles,
trucks, and recreational vehicles, minor automotive
repair, ~~.~ ~ ~, and installation of
accessories. Uses typically include car dealerships
with serwice departments.
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO.
ISPA 94-03 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
July 20, 1994
Page 4
SECTION 10: Part III, Table III-2, Subsection D, page III-11, is
hereby amended to add a new land use type to read as follows:
Adult Entertainments Activities typically include,
but are not limited tel adult entertainment
establishments as defined by the Development Code.
Uses typically include, hut are not limited to,
adult boek stores, adult motion picture
establishments, adult mini-motion picture theaters,
adult motion picture arcades, adult drive-in
theaters, adult cabarets, adult motels or hotels,
adult theaters, adult model studios, sexual
encounter establishments, and body painting studios.
SECTION 11: Part IZI, Table III-2, Subsection D, page III-14, is
hereby amended to delete, in its entirety, the definition for "Eating and
Drinking Establishments.-
SECTION 12: Part III, Table III-2, Subsection D, page III-16, is
hereby amended to add the following new land use types to read as follows:
Restaurants~ Activities typically include, but are
not limited to~ retail sale, from the premises, of
unpackaged food or beverages generally prepared for
on-premises consumption. uses typically include,
but are not limited tot restaurants with incidental
serving of beer and wine, cafeterias, and
delicatessens; and exclude fast food type services,
cocktail lounges, bars, entertainment, or dancing,
Restaurants with bar or entertainments Activities
typically include, but are not limited tot the
retail sale, from the premises, of unpackaged food
or beverages, including hard liquor, generally
prepared for on-premises consnmption, uses
typically include, but are not limited tel
restaurants with hard liquor sales, dancing, or
entertainment; cocktail lounges; and bars,
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO.
ISPA 94-03 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
July 20, 1994
Page 5
SECTION 13: Part III, Table III-2, Subsection E, page III-17, is
hereby amended to add the following new land. use types to read as follows:
Day Care Facility.. Activities typically include,
but are not limited to: establishments for non-
medical care to infants and preschool and school age
children under 18 years of age during a p~rtion of
the day. Uses typically include, but are not
limited to: infant centers, nursery schools, pre-
schools, and similar facilities.
echoelse Activities typically include, but are not
limited to: public and private educational
institutions. Uses typically include, but are not
limited to: vocational or business trade schools,
colleges, and universities.
SECTION 14: The City Council declares that, should any provision,
section, paragraph, sentence, or word of this Ordinance be rendered or
declared invalid by any final court action in a court of competent
Jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptlye legislation, the renaining
provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences, and words of this Ordinance shall
remain in full force and effect.
TABLE II1-1
SUMMARY OF LAND USE TYPE BY SUBAREA
USETYPES
.MANUFACTURING
Custom
Light
Medium
Heavy
I:::::,l:J :'1 :'1 :'t :'1 :'1:1 ':1 :'1':1 ,'o'l :1 :l ;:1 :! :! ',:1 ':
P P p p P P P P p P P P P P P
P P P p p P P P p P P P P P P
C C C p C P P p p p p
Minimum Impact Heavy
Administrative & Office
Professional/DesignServices
Researc~ Services
Public Storage
Light
Medium
.Heavy
Collection Facilities
Processing Facilitje
ScraD O;x~ation
P P P P PP P P p IP~
C C C C C C
ip pppppp pp p p~ PPPPPP
C C CC CCC CCCC CC
C CCCCC CCC C CCCCCCCC
CC C C CCC CCCC CC
C' CC, CC;Cc, C,C cGcCC CC
C CCCCCC CC Cc, C, c C cC
Administrative Civic Services
Cultural
Extensive Impact Utility Facilities
Flood Con~'ol/Utility Corridor
Pul~ic Safety & Utility Sen~cel
Religious Asseml:)ly
~chaeie
I""1 - I~b,-;,,<- ItdUeesnelPenmmd
TABLE IIi-1 (Continue) o
SUMMARY OF LAND USE TYPE BY SUBAREA
USE TY;ES ' LAND USE IP GI GI GI GI GI IP IP GI MI/H GI GI IP GI GI HI tP IP
'Ag,cu~tura/Nursery SuPO.es & Serv~es
AutomotlveRentaVke--ihg _
AutOmotive/LjghtTruck Repajr-Minor io
Automotive Service Court ? f 12 ~ 4l C ~ P p p
Automotive Service Station c c c c c c C c c c c c
Building ConlTactor's Office & Yatcls P PI3' p rp' I'g p ip p p P p ,
Building Contractors Storage Yard
Building MaintenanceSen~ce p p p P p P P p P P p P
Building & Light Equipment Supplies & Sa/es P c p c ~ c P P c p c c p
nsive rapact Commercial C
Food&OevefageSales c C
Funeral & Cremato~ Sefviclm c c c
,.Heavy Equipment SaJel & Rentall C C ~rf c c If c c c c/p
M~.~Se~mCare . p p f p ~' p p p c
PPCPP P P ImP PPC
SpeciaJty SuildiPq Supgill & Home k,(xo, i.,,int ~ If c
/~et, tt~f~ ~,;+41 Jar ,r f.~fef'-/eis4meA'tC C C
Ip - Indu~14/Plfk
Permitted Use
Conditionely Permitrid
Non-rnedmd Ueel Not Pernile
ORDINANCE NOo 530
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN
AMENDMENT 94-01, AMENDING THE LAND USES WITHIN THE OFFICE
AND COM]4ERCIAL DISTRICTS, AND M~.KING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT
THEMEOF.
A. Recitals.
1. The purpose and intent of this Ordinance is to streamline the
review process for certain land uses. The Etiwanda Specific Plan currently
provides regulations for the use of land. Prior to the adoption of this
Ordinance, this Council had available and reviewed a detailed study prepared
by a consultant with respect to the development review process. The general
summary of the study is that the customers (developers, business owners, etc.)
are concerned with the length of time required to complete the process. This
Council hereby finds and declares its intent:
a. That the review process should be simplifie~ without
compromising the quality of the development.
b. To create greater efficiency in the process to allow the
Planning Commission to focus on broader policy issues.
c. To maintain a process that is timely, fair, and thorough.
2. On June 8, 1994, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing concerning the above-
referenced amendment and, following the conclusion thereof, adopted its
Resolution No. 94-52, recommending that the City Council adopt these
amendments.
3. On July 20, 1994, the City Council conducted and concluded a
duly noticed public hearing concerning the subject amendments to the Etiwanda
Specific Plan.
4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance
have occurred.
B. Ordinance.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby ordain
as follows:
SECTION 1: The City Council hereby specifically finds that all of
the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and
correct.
SECTION 2: The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby
finds that this amendment is established and adopted to protect and promote
the public health, safety, morals, comfort, convenience, and welfare; and more
particularly:
57
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO.
ESPA 94-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
July 20, 1994
Page 2
1. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General
Plan'of the City of Rancho Cucamonga;
2. That the proposed amendment is consistent with the Development
Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga;
3. That the proposed amendment does not conflict with the Land Use
Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the
district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related
development;
4. That. the proposed
environmental impact; and
amendment will have
no significant
5. That the proposed amendment is consistent with the objectives of
the Etiwanda Specific Plan.
SECTION 3: The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby
finds that the project has been prepared and reviewed in compliance with the
California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines
promulgated thereunder, and further, specifically finds that based upon
substantial evidence, it can be seen with certainty that there is no
possibility that the proposed Ordinance will have a significant effect on the
environment and, therefore, the proposed Ordinance is exempt pursuant to State
CEQA Guidelines, Section 15061 (b)(3).
SECTION 4: The Etiwanda Specific Plan text, Part Two, Chapter 5,
Section 5.23,203, commencing on page 5-11, is hereby amended to read as
attached.
SECTION 5: The City Council declares that, should any provision,
section, paragraph, sentence, or word of this Ordinance be rendered or
declared invalid by any final court action in a court of competent
jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining
provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences, and words of this Ordinance shall
remain in full force and effect.
USE
NC
CC
Adminis~ative, business, and
professional offices ...............
P
P
Ambulance services ...............
Antique shops ....................
P
C
Amusement enterprise such as fairs,
merry-go-rounds, rarris wheels or
carouseIs, and simil*P use operated on a
temporary basis ..................
Apparel stores ...................
Art end artist~ supply stores .........
Art galleries and stores selling objects of
art eeeeeeeeeeoo®eoeooeeeoeeeoe
C
P
P
P
P
Automobile rental agencies ...........
Automobile rel~rtr~, ov;rhaulL,m,
~s~,"dir~, and painting, mludin( body
and fsad{r shoL~s) ..................
Automobile sales and service sgeneies.
Automobile supply stores ...........
P
Automobile upholstery and top shops. ,.
Automobile washing, ineludtng use of
meehanieai conveyors, blowers, and
steam cleaners ...................
Automobile washing, self-seviee .....
C
Bakeries, baking of item for sale on
premises only ....................
P
P
Barber shops and beauty shotx ........
P
P
Bicycle shops ....................
P
P
Blueprint and photocopy services ......
P
P
Book stores .....................
P
P
Bowling aileys ...................
DISTRICT
FC
C
C
GC
P
C
P
OP
P
C
p -
P P
p -
P -
p -
P P
p -
P P
P C
-
59
USE
Business and office services .........
Camera and photography shops and
studios .........................
Candy stores and confectionaries ......
Carpet and rug sales and installation.
Catering services .................
China and glassware stores ..........
Christmas tree sales lots operated on a
temporary basis ..................
Churches .......................
Ciliar stores and smoke shops ........
Cleaninli establishments and laundries,
self-service or coin-operated .........
Cleaning and launderinli services and
pick-up agencies without bulk cleaning,
Cocktail lounlies ..................
Curtaz~'~t~l apart, s~o~
· ..
Delicatessens and specialty food stores
Department stores, junior..' .........
Druli stores and pharmacies ..........
Electrical equipment sales and repair
shops ..........................
Electronic parts and equipment sales ..
Equipment rental alieneies with no
outside storelie ...................
Financial institutions, ineludinli
savings and loan .~oeiations, finance
companies, and credit unions .........
Floor coverings shops ..............
NC
P
DISTRICTS
CC FC GC
- _ p
P p _ p
P p - p
P -
- p
P -
- p
P p - p
Op
P
P
- p P
C C - C C
P P ' P C
P P
P
P P P P -
C C - C -
P P - p -
P P - P C
C ....
P - _ p P
- p
P P
P P
P
P P - p P
P - _ p -
USE
Florists .......................
Food stores .....................
Furniture repair and upholstery shops...
Furniture stores ..................
Gift shops and greeting card shops .....
Glass replacement arid repair shops ....
Hardware stores and home improvement
centers ........................
Heating and ventilating shops, not
including sheet metal fabrication ......
Hobby shops .....................
Hotels and motels .................
Household appliance sales and repair
shops ..........................
Ice cream stores and soda fountains ....
Interior decorsting shops ............
Jenitorial services and supplies .......
Jewelry stores ...................
Leather goods and luggage stores ......
Linen supply services ..............
Liquor stores ....................
Locksmiths .....................
Medical and dental offices and clinics ..
.Messenger services ................
Mortuaries ......................
Motorcycle sales and services ........
Music and dance studios ............
Music stores .....................
NC
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
C
P
P
CC
P
P
P
C
P
C
DISTRICT
P
GC
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
OP
P
P
P
P
C
61
USE DISTRICT
" . NC CC FC GC OP
Musical instrument repair shops ....... p _ _ P _
~urseries and garden supply stores in a
buildin~ or fury sereen~ enelosu~ with
no fertilizer produe~ in b~ form ..... p p P P _
~useries ~d g~den supply stores ...... _ P P _
Office ~d b~ne~ machine stores .... p _ _ P _
Optiei~ a~ optometrie~ sho~ T ..... P P - P p
Paint, gins, ~d w~p~er stores ..... p _ _
Pet ~d bird stores ................ p _
Phon~aph record stores ........... p _ _ P _
Phot~aphie developi~ a~ printing... p _ p P _
Pinb~ ~d elee~onie flame ~eades... C ' - C -
Printing, puO~ng, lith~raphy, ~d
en~aving ........................ _ . P _
Private recreation buffing, or faeffi~ C ' - C -
Pubic u~lity or pub fie ~r~ee ~ruet~s
~d i~t~atio~ .................. C - _ p _
Radio, atefro, a~ televi~ s~ ~d
rep~r ......................... P , _ P _
Re,ton a~ real estate offle~ ....... p p p P P
Restaur~ ha~ ~v~n, ~tv~FP
t~o~h, or w~p ser~. .......... C C ,
Restaurants, cocktail loun~es~'od/t~eej~u~
estabtishments providing Hve ~
entertainment ...................
Secretarial services ...............
P - _ p P
USE
cr '~'2
Service~ stations(;:..uzi. ,':~. ~. :~. :~ ~ !~ ~
Shoe s~ores and shoe ~epair shops ......
Sporting goods stores ..............
Stationery stores .................
Swimming pool service and sales ......
Tailor shops .....................
Theaters and auditoriums within
buildings .......................
Toy stores ......................
Travel agencies and bureaus .........
Typewriter sales and service
establishments ...................
Variety stores ...................
Veterinarian's offices and smeJl animal
hospitals, including short term boarding
of animals and incidental care such as
bathing and trimming, with all operations
conducted within a buildin~ which is
completely enclosed, soundproofed, and
air conditioned ...................
Watch and clock repair shops .........
Wholesale business establishments
without warehousin~ or distribution ....
Yardage goods stores ..............
NC
C
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
DISTRICT
CC
P
P
FC
GC
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
Op
C
P
ORDINANCE NOo 531
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCANONG~, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC
PLAN AHENDMENT 94-01, AMENDING THE LAND USES WITHIN THE
NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN
SUPPORT THEREOF.
A. Recitals.
1. The purpose and intent of this Ordinance is to streamline the
review process for certain land uses. The Etiwanda North Specific Plan
currently provides regulations for the use of land. Prior to the adoption of
this Ordinance, this Council had available and reviewed a detailed study
prepared by a consultant with respect to the development review process. The
general summary of the study is that the customers (developers, business
owners, etc.) are concerned with the length of time required to complete the
process. This Council hereby finds and declares its intent:
a. That the review process should be simplified without
compromising the quality of the development.
b. To create greater efficiency in the process to allow the
Planning Commission to focus on broader policy issues.
c. To maintain a process that is timely, fair, and thorough.
2. On June 8, 1994, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing concerning the above-
referenced amendment and, following the conclusion thereof, adopted its
Resolution No. 94-53, recommending that the City Council adopt these
amendments.
3. On July 20, 1994, the City Council conducted and concluded a
duly noticed public hearing concerning the subject amendments to the Etiwanda
North Specific Plan.
4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance
have occurred.
S. Ordinance.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby ordain
as follows:
SECTION 1: The City COuncil hereby specifically finds that all of
the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and
correct.
SECTION 2: The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby
finds that this amendment is established and adopted to protect and promote
the public health, safety, morals, comfort, convenience, and welfare; and more
particularly:
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO.
ENSPA 94-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
July 20, 1994
Page 2
1. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General
Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga;
2. That the proposed amendment is consistent with the Development
Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga;
3. That the proposed amendment does not conflict with the Land Use
Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the
district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related
development;
4. That the proposed
environmental impact; and
amendment will have
no significant
5. That the proposed amendment is consistent with the objectives of
the Etiwanda North Specific Plan.
SECTION 3: The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby
finds that the project has been prepared and reviewed in compliance with the
California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines
promulgated thereunder, and further, specifically finds that based upon
substantial evidence, it can be seen with certainty that there is no
possibility that the proposed Ordinance will have a significant effect on the
environment and, therefore, the proposed Ordinance is exempt pursuant to State
CEQA Guidelines, Section 15061 (b)(3).
SECTION 4: The Etiwanda North Specific Plan text, Part III, Section
10, Development Regulations, Table 4, "Use Regulations for Neighborhood
Commercial Districts,- commencing on page III-10, is hereby amended to read as
attached.
SECTION 5: The City Council declares that, should any provision,
section, paragraph, sentence, or word of this Ordinance be rendered or
declared invalid by any final court action in a court of competent
jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptire legislation, the remaining
provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences, and words of this Ordinance shall
remain in full force and effect.
TABLE 4 - USE REGII~TIONS FOR NEIGHBORHOOD COIVIMERCIAL DISTRICTS
Office sad commercisl urns !iswi below m permiust only within a shOppin~ cenmr. All Mopping cenmrs ars subject
Conditional Use Permit sad Development Coda Seczion 17. lO.O50-F./. The sppropnsm mm'kst smdiss s~t lot consolid~ion,
as detmrmmed by the City Planner, are required in accordance wrath Section 6.2.2.1.
' ' ' "'
A. Offices ,,~d Related Uses
2.
P
3.
P
4. -
P
5.
C
P
8. ~
P
9.
I0.
P
B. '
mineram
Administrative and execuUve office.
Artist and photographic.studios, not including the sale of equipment or suppries,
Clsricsl sad profemonsl office.
building or complex.
C~eners! Commerci,! Uses
Adult business
Animal Cars Fa=ilit,/(animal !mspiml, vsmrinama, e.~mmsrcial ksaml, SrmaninS).
(a) ~--,,ludial emsior insansi, peas, or runs.
(b) T,,,-i~q sxmriar ksaml, peru, or
Art, muai~ mid phomgrsl~lk ~ and supply status,
Arcades (ms special rsquirsmsms Ira' Dsveiopmsnt Code Section 17.10.030 lk").
Atlge~ and Hatira Club, tyros and weight reducing clinics.
'1
P
C
TABLE 4 - USE REGULATIONS FOR I~EIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL D~TRICTS (CONTINTeD)
Automoi3~serv~es (in~ludin~ motorcycles, boa/s, trailer'and camper)
(s) sales
rein
repairs (major en~ work, muffler shops, paimml, bedy w~rk and upbol~ery.
(d) Automatic Washin~
(e) Service or i~asoline dispensinl; statior~ (includinl; minor repair such as tune-ups, brakes,
battenes, tires, mu/~ers)
(F) Parts and supplies
NC
C
C
10. Bakeries (r~mil only).
.__ I 1. Barber and beauty shops.
Bicycle sholm.
I3.. Blueprint and photocopy services.
k"/~~sf~'i~ ' ' ' '~j~-' "':ell.
15.
Book, fir and mazionory worm (oeer than adult related mamriaD.
Candy storm sad conhctiouerim.
Camrinl emblidunenu.
L"baninl and premal mabli*k.
Cocknil le~le tier, knmp, avenO isllli~l rels~
(a) Glmfalad isdNs,,' '4e ' of · resaurmU.
(b)
21.
(a) Inslees, use such u bowtinS. ~earm, bill3arda,
Co) C. mif, Te,,-a*, OnuSore, uses such as basketNil, baseball, tramlmlims, ~
Dairypmduetmeru,
P
e
C
TABLE 4 - USE REGULATIONS FOR NEIGI.[BOR.HOOD CO/vIM~RCIAL DISTRICTS (CONT]INU'ED)
24. ]:~rive-m busram, excludinI theaters (other thin, fast food resmaraau).
Drui stores a~d pbarma~iu.
26. Fur-food rumuraats.
27. Feed/Tack smru
28. Florist shop..
29. Food smres and supermarkets.
30. hrmmre
31. C, eneral malt
32.
33. he improvement cemrs
(a) Maatial m~red mul mid wilttin sacIS building
(b) Outdoor storap of
:34. Zc4 Ma=kbm (aakor).
3J. ~aaitoriaJ Mtwices tad
36. ~eee/ry a
37. Lmudr/-mif~m~ice.
31. Liquorsotto.
39./Cicdm for~y dmpe, t~!m dtq~mg. iapgkial lo~.
41. Neweplper lad mtp~i~-
42. NurMrim and 8arden sup!
43.
:bop.
F~
I,,,,:
C
P
C
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
~'p
P
P
TABLE 4 - USE KEGULATIONS FOR NEIGHBORHOOD COM]~ERCIAL DISTRICTS (CONTINUED)
USE
ResUunms (o~2er ~un fast food).
en~em ~c~'//~ ~ ~
~)
blcZdenrai serving of bssr and wins buz withoax a cocktail lounSe, bar, entertainment or
49. Shos smrss, sales and repair.
50. Sporting goods stores.
51 . Stamp and coin shops.
52. Swimming pool suppUes.
:53. Tailor.
~ Twlevzdls~ r~;^ .--~,, and-
JS. Toy suxss.
56 . Travsl qenciss.
Transportation fantitiss (train and bus, taxi dspou).
Varioty storm.
C. Public ,aa semi-~ublic ~
I.
2.
3.
6.
7.
Day Cars Facilitios
Psivats and public clubs and lodps, includin$ YMCA, YWCA and similar youth $roup ~sss.
Educational institutions, panxhid, privss Cmcludiq cotlops and uiversides).
LAbiatim sad m~ pubUs ot privss.
Purks and recreation faciJids, pubUs or privum.
PUblic tfi:~ty in -it-do--,
Vo~sioasl ~ Ismissss a admeb,
D. Accessory Usss
1. ~-cefs~.y strutautos and nasa c~mmarily iacidsmal s · psrmismd um sad ce, w-~vd oa dm ssms
sis.
sis.
C
P
cl
P
TABIX 4 - US~E lif43ULATIONS FOR NEIGHBORHOOD COMI4XRCIAL DISTRICTS (CONTINI~D)
NOTE:
4. Amusement Devices, per Development Code Section 17.10.030*F.
E. Temt~orarv Uses
1. Tempormry uses am prucnbed in Developme-r Code Section 17.04.070 and subject to tAGto
pmvimom.
2. Temporary office modules, subject to pmvimom in Developme,,, Code SecUou 17.10.030-1:.4.
For darmitjom sm Developaroma Code, Seajam 17.02.140
P
ORDINANCE NOo 532
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN
AMENDMENT 94-01, AMENDING THE LAND°USES WITHIN THE OFFICE
AND COMMERCIAL AREAS, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT
THEREOF.
A. Recitals.
1. The purpose and intent of this Ordinance is to streamline the
review process for certain land uses. The Victoria Community Plan currently
provides regulations for the use of land. Prior to the adoption of this
Ordinance, this Council had available and reviewed a detailed study prepared
by a consultant with respect to the development review process. The general
summary of the study is that the customers (developers, business owners, etc.)
are concerned with the length of time required to complete the process. This
Council hereby finds and declares its intent:
a. That the review process should be simplified without
compromising the quality of the development.
b. To create greater efficiency in the process to allow the
Planning Commission to focus on broader policy issues.
c. To maintain a process that is timely, fair, and thorough.
2. On June 8, 1994, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing concerning the above-
referenced amendment and, following the conclusion thereof, adopted its
Resolution No. 94-54, recommending that the City Council adopt these
amendments.
3. On July 20, 1994, the City Council conducted and concluded a
duly noticed public hearing concerning the subject amendments to the Victoria
Community Plan.
4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance
have occurred.
B. Ordinance.
The City CounciX of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby ordain
as followsz
SECTION 1: The City Council hereby specifically finds that all of
the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and
correct.
SECTION 2: The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby
finds that this amendment is established and adopted to protect and promote
the public health, safety, morals, comfort, convenience, and welfare; and more
particularly:
71
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO.
VCPA 94-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
July 20, 1994
Page 2
1. That this Community Plan text amendment is consistent with the
General' Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga;
2. That this Community Plan text amendment is consistent with the
Development Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and
3. That this Community Plan text amendment will have no significant
environmental impact.
SECTION 3: The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby
finds that the project has been prepared and reviewed in compliance with the
California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines
promulgated thereunder, and further, specifically finds that based upon
substantial evidence, it can be seen with certainty that there is no
possibility that the proposed Ordinance will have a significant effect on the
environment and, therefore, the proposed Ordinance is exempt pursuant to State
CEQA Guidelines, Section 15061 (b)(3).
SECTION 4: The Victoria Community Plan text, Part 3, Section I,
Regulations & Standards for Development, Subsection "Commercial Standards,"
commencing on page 235, is hereby amended to read as attached.
SECTION 5: The City Council declares that, should any provision,
section, paragraph, sentence, or word of this Ordinance be rendered or
declared invalid by any final court action in a court of competent
jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptire legislation, the remaining
provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences, and words of this Ordinance shall
remain in full force and effect.
COMM_=:=tC;AI, ST. ANSA,=,DS
General provisions for land uses designated as Reglcnal
Center, Regicna!-re!a:ed Ccmmeroia! and. Village
Commercial.
a. Site Deve!o.cment Standards:
(!)
Building site coverage: No maximum subject
Development Approval Process.
(2) Building site width: !S0 foot minimum
(3)
Building height: 65 feet typical maximum;
buildings over 65 feet subjet: to a
conditional use permit.
Uses not permmitted within the Planned Community:
Massage Parlors
"Adult" Movi;
c. Sbo~ptme Caters. To me that the Seals end poli~4es of
the ~ssmr&L FXa ud ~~ ~a am ~a~e~ a
~ti~ ~m Pe~ ~ ~ =~~ for ~pinS
caters. h su~ s ~a. ~ fo~I c~ts~a s~ ~
~iar~:
The trslsitim fm more seMitire lad uses sad
b~fferin8 se~o4s to mitiSste arcisL ac~ivities ouch
u leadenl. li2htinl, end tx~h coilsella;
(2) The ~ester has been plsumd ssa Ireup of orBsnised uses
(3) The center is desiBmed witIt one theme. w~di build/aSs
sz~bttec~uzsA style. similar mex~Lor taildial
mteris~s. end a coordinsted lsnds~spin8 tiara);
(4) The center sskss provistas for consistent sa~ntemnce.
~pro~LX access sad re~iproc&L psrk4all
(3) Vide sad pedestx~su access is cooreLated and
loeleal/y linked to provide · cosprehesive circulation
sygm; sad
(6) The developseat or approvsL of say per:lea of · center
shs]/ msqtL~re the deveLopseat of s coucsptusl deveLo~-
at plm which shill consider such th4-11 as, but mot
14-4ted to, circu~atiou, usifom st-h4tectureL dssiBn.
drshssle/Sradiab b~ffere, phased fsproveets sad
lsudscep~uS.
CQ~MMERC:AL ,~TANC3A~S
Regional
The ~o!Icwing general ca:stories cf uses shall
(!)
(2)
Re=ai! ~usinesses,
~-nc!uding, ~ut no= limi=ed
depar',ment stores
drug s=ores
jewel=It s=o=es
f~~.%~/equipment sales
musical instrument sales
candy s=ores
~:hotograp~y equipment sales
Sevice businesses, inclu~ing, but not limited
13)
· watch and jewelry repair
· beauty parlors
· travel agencies'
·
Administra=ive and professional offices
(5) Res=a~cs(eK~d;.9 ~+ ~a ~r;Ve-~rv) ~;~ ;~;~e.~
(6) ~rse~es mad isr~n supply stores, prwided that
fer=il~er of ~ ~pe sh~l be sold and so,red in
pe~Sed foe o~.
(7) Public Utilit7 offices·
(8) b'nolesale business offices with samples on the praises.
but not to include lenstel st,rate,
(9)
Accessory structures and uses necessary or customerely
incidental ~o the above uses as permitted by the Ranch,
Cucssc~Ss Zonin8 Ordinance.
(10) Permitted Co, strait7 Facilities listed on Pale 2~1.
TJses ~ecmi::ed s~b~ec~ :o
~se Permit:
(3)
(~)
ARi .-1 c;we Jaeili=ies, n~ ~=ludin8
Per~-ial lets and pmck~n8 bu~IdinSs.
Automobile service stations and car washes,
Automobile sales end 'service,
(5) Electric distribution switch stations.
(6) Communication equipment buildings,
(7) Public utili=7 booster stations.
(9) ACCeSSOry structures and uses necessary or custcmaril~
incidental co the above uses as speciEically provided
for b~ the use permit and the Zonini Ordinance of the
Cit7 of Pancho CucamonSa,
(10} Conditionally permitted Community Facilities listed on
PaSs 24~.
(11) Shopping cutere subject to Pz~s'a. ons h~ Section 1 ou
Pale 235.
3. .Re~na! Re~aced '..and ~'ses
(3)
(7) ~rseries and iar~n supply stores, pr~idad that
fartiller of a~ ~pe ~ sEored and sold in pachged
fore o~y.
(8) Public utility offices,
(I0) Sel~-servics Laundr,/ and self-service IT/ cleanLn~
facilities.
(II) Accessor~ structures and uses necessar7 or cust~naril7
incidental to the above uses as permitted b7 :he Rancho
Cucamongl Zonin8 Ordinance. ' '
(3)
(~)
(~)
(6)
(7)
'(I2) Permitted Cornstrait7 Fatill=is, lis:ed on Page 2~1.
Uses permitted subject to a Conditional Use Permit:
(1) Animal cars facilities.
Pa~n2 lots and parkin2
Public utilit7 exchange and
Public buil d~ng..
Acresect7 s=rucEures and uses necessary or cusucmarily
inc~denrtt Eo the above uses as specifically provided
for by =he use permit.
Condi~ionally permitted C~mmuniry Ficili:ies listed on
Page
(S)
ShoJq~n8 Centers subjet~ to provisions in Section 1 on
Pap 23~,
W
VILLAGE OOMM~RCIAL
(2)
C3)
The f6Zlwin8 ionoral caretotiss of uses shall be permitted:
(I) ReTail businesses, including but not limited
o meac marks:s, delicatessens
o produce markecs
o dru2 scores
o d~ 2cod s~ores
o harbors sales
o pe~ s:ores
o clo:hinS stores
o flor~sE shops
Se~ice businesses. in~u~ns bu: no: l~iced ~o:
o
o
o
o
o
Adm:n:s:rauive and professional offices.
banks. financial insuitutions(;wc/oc~;~ d~;,-' +hro)
barber shops, ~eau~ parlors
loc~m~hs
la~d~ ~d d~ ~eanins es~ablis~en~s
sel~se~ice la~d~ and d~ ~e~in2
Governmental offices.
(5) Res:auran:s (other :ken fas~ food). includtn2 incidenttt
sereinI of beer and wine !ml: without · cocktail lewis"
bar, antenainaant or dancluB.
Accessor7 s:ruc:ures and uses necessary or cus:cmarily
inciden:al to the above as provided for in :he Kancho
Cucsmonta Zonin2 Ordinance.
Uses pezmitZed subject :o specific approval of a Conditional
am Pez~Lt:
(2) crone,d--co u~ts. '
(3) ras~ foel restaurants.
(~.) Vine end liquor stores.
( S ) Restau~ents eith entertainseat
alcoholic beyeraSes.
end/or antvine of
(6) Shoppint centers eubjec~ to provisions in Section 1 ou
Page 235,
(7)
Conditionally perxi::ed ~tmit7 FooLS/ties listed on
Pate 241.
ORDINANCE NO, 533
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING TERRA VISTA COMMUNITy
PLAN AMENDMENT 94-02, AMENDING THE LAND USES WITHIN THE
OFFICE AND COMMERCIAL AREAS, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN
SUPPORT THEREOF.
A. Recitals.
1. The purpose and intent of this Ordinance is to streamline the
review process for certain land uses. The Terra Vista Community Plan
currently provides regulations for the use of land. Prior to the adoption of
this Ordinance, this Council had available and reviewed a detailed study
prepared by a consultant with respect to the development review process. The
general summary of the study is that the customers (developers, business
owners, etc.) are concerned with the length of time required to complete the
process. This Council hereby finds and declares its intent:
a. That the review process should be simplified without
compromising the quality of the development.
b. To create greater efficiency in the process to allow the
Planning Commission to focus on broader policy issues.
c. To maintain a process that is timely, fair, and thorough.
2, On June 8, 1994, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing concerning the above-
referenced amendment and, following the conclusion thereof, adopted its
Resolution No. 94-55, recommending that the City Council adopt these
amendments.
3. On July 20, 1994, the City Council conducted and concluded a
duly noticed public hearing concerning the subject amendments to the Tetra
Vista Community Plan.
4, All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance
have occurred.
B. Ordinance.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby ordain
as follows:
SECTION 1: The City Council hereby specifically finds that all of
the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and
correct.
SECTION 2: The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby
finds that this amendment is established and adopted to protect and promote
the public health, safety, morals, comfort, convenience, and welfare; and more
particularly:
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO.
TVCPA 94-02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
July 20, 1994
Page 2
1. That this Community Plan text amendment is consistent with the
General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga;
2. That this Community Plan text amendment is consistent with the
Development Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and
3. That this Community Plan text amendment will have no significant
environmental impact.
SECTION 3: The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby
finds that the project has been prepared and reviewed in compliance with the
California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines
promulgated thereunder, and further, specifically finds that based upon
substantial evidence, it can be seen with certainty that there is no
possibility that the proposed Ordinance will have a significant effect on the
environment and, therefore, the proposed Ordinance is exempt pursuant to State
CEQA Guidelines, Section 15061 (b)(3).
SECTION 4: The Terra Vista Community Plan text, Chapter
Subsection "Office and Commercial Development Standards,- commencing on page
V-20, is hereby amended to read as attached.
SECTION 5: The City Council declares that, should any provision,
section, paragraph, sentence, or word of this Ordinance be rendered or
declared invalid by any final court action in a court of competent
jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptlye legislation, the remaining
provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences, and words of this Ordinance shall
remain in full force and effect.
and Commercial Development
Stondards
GENERAL TO ALL OFFICE AND COMMERCIAL AREAS:
Uses Not Permitted Within The Planned Community
Massage parlors
"Adult" marie theaters
'tAdult" L;~,I. ~t_,
(fl
The development or approval of any portion
of a center shall require the development of a
conceptual development plan which shall
consider such things as, but not limited to,
circulation, uniform architectural design.
drainage/grading, buffers; phased
improvements and landscaping.
Shoppinq Centers
To ensure that the goals and policies of the General
Plan and Community Plan are implemented, a
Conditional Use Permit shall be required for shopping
centers. In such a review, the following criteria shall
be considered:
(a|
The transition from more sensitive land uses
and buffering methods to mitigate commercial
activities such as loading, lighting, and trash
col lection;
[b) The center has been planned as a group of
organized uses and structures;
Ic)
The center is designed with one theme, with
buildings and landscaping consistent with
design (similar architectural style, similar
exterior building materials, and a coordinated
landscaping theme );
Idi
The center makes provisions for consistent
maintenance, reciprocal access and reciprocal
parking;
(e)
Vehicle and pedestrian access is coordinated
and logically linked to provide a
comprehensive circulation system; and
Uses Permitted in Areas Desiqnated "CC"
The following general categories of uses shall be
permittad:
Retail businesses, such as but not limited to:
Department stores
Showroom/catalogue stores
Outlet or off-price stores
Variety stores
Import stores
Grocery stores
Delicatessens
Bakeries and other specialty food
Wine and liquor stores (C.L)i2)
Drug stores
Clothing stores
Shoe stores
Jewelry stores
Book stores
Record stores
Electronics equipment stores
RadiolTVIstereo stores
Photo equipment stores
Furniture stores
Wallcoverings stores
Lighting stores
Pet stores
stores
REVISED Amendmenl No. 3, 5 & 6
V - 20
Hardware stores
Sporting goods stores
Plant stores
Toy stores
Gift shops
Home improvement centers
Carpet and flooring stores
Paint stores
Lighting stores
Musical instrument stores
Home furnishings and accessories stores
Telephone stores
Auto parts stores
Nurseries and garden supply stores
Home appliance stores
Plumbing supply stores
Service businesses, Ior sales-and-service
businesses), including but not limited to:
Travel agencies
Beauty parlors and barbers
Printers
Dry cleaners and laundries
Photo and art studios or galleries
Lacksmiths
Interior designers
Landscape architects
Pool and Spa installers
Cabinetmakers and other contractors
Home security analysts
Equipment rental
Home appliance repairmen
Administrative and professional offices, including but
not limited to:
Optometrists
Tax preparation service
Legal or accounting offices
Medical or dental offices
inistrative offices
Employment agencies
Escrow companies
E~;anks and other financial_institutions
Movie theaters
Health clubs and spas
Music eF, dance studios, ~';,u hz~:/or ~z.~ ~,'/u,./,:.' .,.
Facilities for the performing arts
Automobile businesses limited to the following:
Service stations and car washes,4C-UPT~
Auto parts stores
Auto sales and services businesses affiliated with
a department store or similar concern {CUP)
Community facilities as specified above
Hotels and motels
Wholesale businesses ( CUP
Shopping centers subject to provisions as specified
above I CUP )
Real estate brokers
Insurance agent
Accessory structure and uses necessary
customarily incidental to the above uses
OF
REVISED Amendmenl No. 3.5 & 6
V-'
Other uses which are found by the Planning
Commission to be consistent with the spirit and intent
of this land use classification
Uses Permitted in Areas Designated "OP"
The following general categories of uses shall be
permitted:
Administrative offices
Professional offices. including but not limited to such
professions as:
Accounting
Law
Insurance
Architecture
Engineering
Medicine
Dentistry
Real estate
Financial brokerage
Securities brokerage
Institutional and governmental uses
Retail and service businesses serving the needs of
office users. including but not limited to:
~rinters
Stationers
Secretarial services
Commercial recreation facilities compatible with office
use. including but not limited to:
Banks and other financial institutions~'~'.. ,'~,.//,,~ j'r,'~c
Eating and ~i~ing ~t~lishments
Automobile service stations ( CUP )
Community facilities as specified above
Accessory structures and uses necessary or
customarily incidental to the above uses
Other uses which are found by the Planning
Commission to be consistent with the spirit and intent
of this land use classification.
Uses Permitted in Areas Desiqnated "RC-
The following general categories of uses shall be
perre| tted:
Commercial recreation and entertainment facilities,
including but not limited to:
Health clubs. gyms. spas
Racquetball clubs
Dance studios
Karate or yoga studios
Swimming pools
Tennis courts
Batting cages | CUP )
Trampolines |CUPI
Miniature golf | CUP I
Video arcades | CUP |
Bowling alleys
Retail and service businesses oriented to active
recreation, including but not limited to:
Bicycle rental, repair, and sales
REVISED Amendment No. 3, 5 & 6
V - 22
Skate rental
Kite shop
Sports equipment rental
Sportswear sales
Sporting goods store
Pro shop
Eating and drinking establishments, including but not
limited to:
Sidewalk cafes
Coffee houses
Frozen yogurt or ice cream parlors
Snack bars or kiosks
Specialty retail and service businesses, including but
not limited to:
Art galleries and studios, indoor or outdoor
Crafts and hobby shops
Flower shops
Health food stores
Gift shops
Public or private facilities for the performing arts,
indoor or outdoor, including but not limited to:
Little theater
Amphitheater
OutdoOr assembly or performing arts area
Grocery stores,
specialty | CUP |
general, convenience, and/or
Community facilities as specified above
Shopping centers subject to provisions as specified
above |CUPI
Accessory structures and uses necessary
customarily incidental to the above uses
or
Other uses which are found by the Planning
Commission to be consistent with the spirit and intent
of this land use classification
Uses Permitted in Areas Desiqnated "NC"
The following general categories of uses shall be
permitted:
Retail businesses, including but not limited to:
Grocery stores
Delicatessens
Bakeries and other spec'alty ood
Wine and liquor stores ~C//~
Drug stores
Clothing stores
Variety ,stores
Hardware stores
Plant stores
Gift shops
stores
Service businesses, including but not limited to:
Beauty parlors and barbers
Printers
Dry cleaners and laundries
Travel agencies
Locksmiths
Administrative and professional offices
Restaurants lother than fast food I, including serving
of beer and wine but without a cocktail lounge, bar,
entertainment or dancing
REVISED Amendmen! No. 3. 5 & 6
V-;'
and drinking establishments -~
Banks and other financial institutionsC;~./,~a,,,~/dr~,c *~r%)
Commercial recreation facilities. including but not
limited to health clubs and studios (CUP)
Automobile service stations [CUP)
Convenience markets [ CUP )
ast-food restaurants ( CUP )
-Wi..e a.d liq.... st...e=. (CUP)
cl,,jg.V' ~ , )
Community facilities as specified above,
institutional and governmental uses
serving of
including
Shopping centers subject to provisions as specified
above ( CUP )
Restaurants (//4~,~ S,~,~ ,~/. V-~ i,,)
Administrative and professional offices
Service businesses
Institutional and governmental uses
Automobile service stations
Commercial recreation and entertainment facilities
Community facilities as specified above
Accessory structures and uses necessary or
customarily incidental to the above
Other uses which are found by the Planning
Commission to be consistent with the spirit and intent
of this land use classification
Uses Permitted in Areas Desiqnated "MHO"
Accessory structures and uses necessary or
customarily incidental to the above uses
Other uses which are found by the Planning
Commission to be consistent with the spirit and intent
of this land use classification
Uses Permitted in Areas Desiqnated "MFC"
The following general categories of uses shall be
permitted:
Residential uses as permitted in High Density and
Medium High Density residential areas
Retail businesses
The
permitted:
Residential uses as permitted in High Density and
Medium High Density residential areas
Hospitals, clinics, and other medical uses
Medical offices
Other uses accessory or related to the above including
but not limited to:
Retail businesses
Administrative and professional offices
following general categories of uses shall be
REVISED Amendmenl No. 3.5 & 6
V - 24
Service businesses
Restaurants ( ~',~ ,,, f,
Commercial recreation and entertainment facilities
Community facilities ~s specified above
Accessory structures and uses necessary or
customarily incidental to the above
Other uses which are found by the Planning
Commission to be consistent with the spirit and intent
of this land use classification
Uses Permitted in Areas Desiqnated "MOC"
The following general categories of uses shall be
permitted:
Residential uses as permitted in High Density, Medium
High Density, and Medium Density residential areas
Hospitals, clinics, and medical offices
Retail and service businesses
Administrative and p~r fessio al offices
Restaurants/~,t(,~ .~--< ,l~y- z I)
Hotels
Automotive sales and service businesses
AutomotiVe service stations and car washes
Community facilities as specified above
Accessory structures and uses necessary or
customarily incidental to the above
Other uses which are found by the Planning
Commission to be consistent with the spirit and intent
of this land use classification
Uses Permitted in Business Park Overlay Zone
In addition to the uses permitted by the base zone,
the following general categories of uses shall be
permitted in the Business Park Overlay Zone:
Administrative offices
Professional offices, including but not limited to such
professions as:
Accounting
Law
Income tax
Insurance
Architecture
Engineering
Medicine
pOptometr y
odiatry
Chiropractic
Osteopathy
Dentistry
Real estate
Escrow
Financial brokerage
Securities brokerage
Interior design
Institutional and governmental uses
Retail and service businesses serving the needs ol
office users, including but not limited to:
REVISED Amendmenl No. 3. 5 & 6
V '
Printers
Stationers
Secretarial services
Office supplies and equipment
Office machine sales and service
Messenger and postal services
Commercial recreation facilities compatible with office
use, including but not limited to:
Health clubs or gyms (CUP)
Racquetball courts (CUP)
Banks and other financial institutions
Eating and drinking establishments
Automobile service stations [CUP]
Retail studios, stores, and associated workshops for
the purpose of sales, office, showroom, and design
with workshop for custom-made samples of products
for display only in the showroom for the following
types of art and craft items: jewelry, picture frames,
quilts, ceramics, potteries, and specialty gift items.
Custom-made consumer goods within studios, stores,
and associated workshops may be allowed, provided
that the workshop areas for custom-made consumer
goods are ancillary to the studios or stores and do not
exceed 35 percent of the leased floor area, and
subject to City Planner approval.
Retail and service businesses serving the needs of
residential users, including but not limited to the
following, and subject to the approval of the City
Planner: Interior design office with showroom,
catering establishments, contractors ( excluding
contractors' yards|, beauty supply stores, fabric
stores. shoe repair shops, antique dealers, security
device salesand service. telephone sales, luggage
sales. pet grooming and supplies, opticians, medical
REVISED Amendmen! No. 3. 5 & 6
V - 26
supply sales and rentals, electrical, electronic, data
processing, and telecommunications sales and service,
audio/video sa~es and service. furniture sales, apparel
shops, and similar businesses.
Convenience retail and service businesses such as
food and beverage sales, newsstands, bookstores.
barber and beauty shops, cleaners, travel bureaus,
photo developing, tuxedo rental, bicycle sales and
repair, locksmiths, ticket sales, etc.
Community facilities ~s specified above
Accessory structures and uses necessary or
customarily incidental to the above uses
Other uses which are found by the Planning
Commission to be consistent with the spirit and intent
of this land use classification
Parking requirements for Business Parks shall be the
same as for office parks, unless otherwise approved
by the Planning Commission.
Site Development Standards for Office and Commercial
Uses
Building site area, site width. and site depth: No
minimum subject to Development Review Process.
Building site coverage: No maximum.
Building setbacks: As indicated in Table V-5.
Parking setbacks: As indicated in Table V-5.
Wall setbacks: As indicated in Table V-5.
Building height:
For areas designated "NC": 40 feet maximum.
For other areas: No maximum.
Building separation: As permitted by the Uniform
Building Code.
ORDINANCE NO, 534
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MUNICIPAL CODE, TITLE 16, SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE, AND
MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF.
A. Recitals.
1. The purpose and intent of this Ordinance is to streamline the
review process for subdivisions. The Subdivision Ordinance of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga currently provides regulations for the subdividing of land
and the review of tentative subdivision maps and tentative parcel maps. Prior
to the adoption of this Ordinance, this Council had available and reviewed a
detailed study prepared by a consultant with respect to the development review
process. The general summary of the study is that the customers (subdividere,
developers, etc.) are concerned with the length of time required to complete
the process. This Council hereby finds and declares its intent:
a. That the review process should be simplified without
tompromising the quality of the development.
b. To create greater efficiency in the process to allow the
Planning Commission to focus on broader policy issues.
c. To maintain a process that is timely, fair, and thorough.
2. On June 8, 1994, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing concerning the above-
referenced amendment and, following the conclusion thereof, adopted its
Resolution No. 94-56, recommending that the City Council adopt these
amendments.
3. On July 20, 1994, the City Council conducted and concluded a
duly noticed public hearing concerning the subject amendments to the
Subdivision Ordinance.
4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance
have occurred.
S. Ordinance.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby ordain
as follows=
SECTION 1: The City Council hereby specifically finds that all of
the facts set forth in the Recitals' Part A, of this Ordinance are true and
correct.
SECTION 2= The City Council of the City of Randho Cucamonga hereby
finds that this amendment is established and adopted to protect and promote
the public health, safety, morals, comfort, convenience, and welfare~ and more
particularly:
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO.
SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
July 20, 1994
Page 2
1. To implement the goals and objectives of the General Plan and to
guide and manage the future growth of the City in accordance with such plan;
2. To protect the physical, social, and economic stability of
residential and other land uses within the City to assure its orderly and
beneficial development;
3. To reduce hazards to the public resulting from the inappropriate
location, use, or design of buildings, and other improvements; and
4. To attain the physical, social, and economic advantages
resulting from comprehensive and orderly land use and resource planning.
SECTION 3: The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby
finds that the project has been prepared and reviewed in compliance with the
California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines
promulgated thereunder, and further, specifically finds that based upon
substantial evidence, it can be seen with certainty that there is no
possibility that the proposed Ordinance will have a significant effect on the
environment and, therefore, the proposed Ordinance is exempt pursuant to State
CEQA Guidelines, Section 15061 (b)(3).
SECTION 4: Section 16.16,170, Subsection B, is hereby deleted in its
entirety and replaced to read as follows:
B. City Planner Action. The City Planner may extend
the approval of a tentative tract map if he finds
that there has been no significant changes in the
General Plan Land Use Element, Development Code or
other applicable specific/co--unity plan, character
of the area within which the Rap iS located, or
current planning policy or past practice that would
cause the approved nap to become inconsistent or
non-conforming. Xf the City Planner finds that
there is significant change, the City Planner shall
refer the extension request to the Planning
Cosmission for consideration.
SECTION 5: Section 16,16.170, Subsaction D, is hereby deleted n its
entirety and replaced to read as follows:
Conditions of Approval, As a condition of the
extension of a tentative tract nap, after conducting
a public hearing, the City Planner or Planning
Commission nay impose new conditions or revise
existing conditions on the approved tentative nap as
they find necessary. kl~ public hearing notice
requirement, of the State Subdivi,ion Map Act ,hall
apply.
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO.
SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
July 20, 1994
Page 3
SECTION 6: Section 16.16.170, Subsection E, is hereby deleted in its
entirety and replaced to read as follows:
Appeal of Extension. The subdivider may appeal in
writing any action of the City Planner to the
Planning COmmission, or any action of the Planning
Commission to the City Council, within fifteen (15)
days of such action in conformenos to
Section 16.16.130.
SECTION 7:
read as follows:
Section 16.16.170, Subsection G, is hereby amended to
Findings· ~M~ ~X~dX~ ~d~ ~ ~,d~g d ~d
¢d~ ~ The granting of an extension shall require
all of the following findings to be made by the
approving body:
The previously approved tentative map is in
substantial compliance with the City's current
General Plan, specific plans, ordinances,
plans, codes and policies;
The extension of the tentative map will not
cause significant inconsistencies with the
current general plan, specific plans,
ordinances, plans, codes and policies:
The extension of the tentative map is not
likely to cause public health and safety
problems;
The extension is within the time limits
prescribed by State law and local ordinance.
Unless all of the above findings are made by
the ~ef46~dd~ approving body, the requested
extension shall be denied.
SECTION 8: Section 16.20.100, Subsection B, is hereby deleted in its
entirety and replaced to read as follows:
City Engineer Action. The city Engineer may
extend the approval of a tentative parcel map
if he finds that there has been no significant
changes in the General Plan Land Use Element,
Developsent Code or other applicable
specific/cotmunity plan, character of the area
within which the map is located, or current
planning policy or past practice that would
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO.
SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
July 20, 1994
Page 4
cause the approved up to become inconsistent
or non-conforming. If the City Engineer finds
that there As significant change, the City
Engineer shall refer the extension request to
the Planning Commission for consideration.
SECTION 9: Section 16.20,100, Subsaction D, is hereby deleted in its
entirety and replaced to read as follows:
Conditions of Approval. As a condition of the
extension of a tentative parcel map, after
conducting a public hearing, the City Engineer
or Planning Commission may impose new
conditions or revise existing conditions on the
approved tentative parcel map as they find
necessary. All public hearing notice
requirements of the State Subdivision Map Act
shall apply.
SECTION 10: Section 16.20.100, Subsection E, is hereby deleted An
its entirety and replaced to read as follows:
Appeal of Extension. The subdivider may appeal
in writing any action of the City Engineer to
the Planning Commission or any action of the
Planning Commission to the City Council, within
fifteen (1S) days of such action in conformance
to Section 16.16.130.
SECTION 11: The City Council declares that, should any provision,
section, paragraph, sentence, or work of this Ordinance be rendered or
declared invalid by any final court action in a cour~ of competent
jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptire legislation, the remaining
provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences, and words of this Ordinance shall
remain in full force and effect.
91
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
August 3, 1994
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William j. A1 exander, Councilmembe '~
CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE AND ADOPT THE NONDISPOSAL
ELEMENT (NDFE)
FACILITY
ECOI~kENDATION
The City Council approve the attached Resolution.
BACKGROUND
AB 3001 requires every California City and County to prepare, approve, and
adopt a Nondlsposal Facility Element (NDFE) for all new Nondisposal Facilities
and any expansions of existing Nondisposal Facilities which will be needed to
implement local Source Reduction and Recycling Elements (SRRE). In essence
this Element identifies the type of Facility, amount of waste sent to the
Facility, expected diversion rate and location of Facility used by our
franchised haulers for waste diversion. The NDFE is also attached for the
City Council's review. The Council will recall that the City's SRRE and HHW
Elements were adopted March 4, 1992.
ANALYSIS
A Nondisposal Facility is defined by PRC Section 40151 as any solid waste
facility required to obtain a State solid waste facility permit other than
sol id waste disposal and transformation facilities. Thus, transfer stations,
material recovery facilities, large-scale composting facilities, and other
waste processing or recycling facil lties which require a solid waste facility
permit, and which are needed to implement local SRRE's, are considered
Nondisposal Facilities that need to be identified and described in the NDFE.
Solid waste landfills and incinerators, however, are not within the definition
of a Nondisposal Facility. Likewise, small scale activities which do not need
a solid waste facility permit such as backyard composting or small scale
beverage container buy-back centers, are not included within the definition of
a Nondisposal Facility and need not be discussed in the NDFE.
A Draft of the NDFE was submitted to the AB 939 Task Force of San Bernardino
as required for review and comment on April 21, 1994 and approved by the Task
Force July 21, 1994. The City will now submit the approved Draft copy of its
NDFE to the California Integrated Waste Management Board as required for
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
AUGUST 3, 1994
PAGE 2
review and approval. Upon approval by the California Integrated Waste
Management Board, the NDFE will be appended to the City's SRRE at the time of
the five year revision. The adoption of this Element is not subject to
environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEOA).
Respectful 1 y submitted,
Will iam J. Alexander
Council member
WJA:dlw
A RESOLUTICiq OF 'IBE ~ ~ OF 'IBE CITY OF RkNCID
OX:AKXfA~ANDADDPIING'I}IENatDI,.qE:M:r:~FACILITy
k'~sMtNI' AS ~ BY AB 3001
WHHU~S, AB 3001 requires the approval ard adoption of a
Facility El~t; ard
MQ~EAS, the California Integated Waste Menagerierot Board h~m been
delegated the reepcr~ibilty for the administrBticn and approval of the
Ncrai.~x~al Facility Elements (NDFE); and
NOW Q}H~gFCRE, BE IT RESOLVHD, that the City Council of the City of
Rarrho O~c~mrrrJa (Ices hereby a[tlu~, adopt and sulm~t tile Ncrdi,~nc~l
Facility Elemnt (NDFE) in ac~r~x~ with AB 3001.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
NONDISPOSAL FACILITY ELEMENT
TYPE OF FACILITY
TABLE M-2
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NDFE
WASTE RECOVERY FACILITIES AND MRF'S
BURRTEC RECYCLING & TRICO TRANSFER
FACT SHEET
Burrtec Recycling & TRICO Tranfer is an existing transfer,
California buyback, and Material Recovery Facility (MRF)
currently processing commingled recyclables from the City
of Rancho Cucamonga and other cities throughout the San
Bernardino and Riverside areas.
AMOUNT OF WASTE
SENT TO FACILITY
EXPECTED DIVERSION
RATE
LOCATION
It is assumed that on an average, 26 tons of waste, or ap-
proximately 20 percent of the waste generated daily in the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, is processed at the Burrtec
Recycling & Trico Transfer
Burrtec Recycling & TRICO Transfer will divert from
disposal approximately 15 percent of the waste generated
yearly in the City of Rancho Cucamonga based on the
following calculations. It is assumed that on an average, 26
tons of waste, or approximately 20 percent of the waste
generated daily in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, will be
processed at the Burrtec Recycling & Trico Transfer. The
total daily average of waste generated in the City and col-
lected by Rancho Disposai(Burrtec) is 128 tons. The amount
of Rancho Cucamonga waste diverted from disposal by
Burrtec Recycling & TRICO Transfer is 19 tons per day
(15% of 128 tons = 19 tons).
* It is anticipated that these materials will be diverted when
the West Valley MRF is opened.
Burrtee Recycling & TRICO tranfer is located in the
unincorporated area of Riverside County.
TABLE M-2
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NDFE
WASTE RECOVERY FACILITIES AND MRE'S
THE WEST VALLEY MRE, WASTE RECOVERY & TRANSFER
FACT SHEET
TYPE OF FACILITY
The West Valley MRF is a proposed mixed waste
processing facility designed to meet the waste recovery and
transfer needs of the West San Bemardino Valley which
includes the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
AMOUNT OF WASTE
SENT TO FACILITY
EXPECTED DIVERSION
RATE
LOCATION
* The West Valley MRF is under development at this time.
It is assumed that on an average, 26 tons of waste, or ap-
proximately 20 percent of the waste generated daily in the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, will be processed at the West
Valley MRF.
The West Valley MRF, will divert from disposal
approximately 15 percent of the waste generated yearly in
the City of Rancho Cucamonga based on the following
calculations. It is assumed that on an average, 26 tons of
waste, or approximately 20 percent of the waste generated
dally in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, will be processed at
the West Valley MRF. The total daily average of waste
generated in the City and collected by Rancho
Disposal(Burrtec) is 128 tons. The amount of Rancho
Cucamonga waste diverted from disposal to is 22 tons per
day (15% of 128 tons = 19 tons)
* After completion it is expected that materials hauled by
Rancho Disposal Co. will be processed at this site.
West Valley MRF is located on approximately 30 acres in
the northwest quarter of the Kaiser millsite in the
unincorporated area of West San Bernardino Valley
TABLE M-2
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NDFE
COMPOSTING FACILITY
CALIFORNIA BIO-MASS & WORLD WOOD RECYCLING
FACT SHEET
TYPE OF FACILITY
California Bio-Mass and World Wood composting faclities
serve as large scale regional composting facilities for the
West San Bernardino County. The materials to be
composted consist of yard waste, other plant debris, wood
waste, other fiber materials, mixed paper and selected sludge
materials. These materials will usually be pre-processed in
chipping and grinding operations that occur at one of the
aforementioned locations. The composting operation will
consist of curring in windrows, post-processing screening to
remove oversized material, and storage of the finished
product before being removed to markets and endusers.
AMOUNT OF WASTE
SENT TO FACILITY
Approximately 14 tons per day of yard waste and other
compostable masterial will be sent to one of these facilities
from the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
EXPECTED DIVERSION
RATE
This facility will divert from disposal approximately 18
percent of the waste generated yearly in the City of Rancho
Cucamonga based on the following calculations. The waste
generation study performed for the City of Rancho
Cucamonga indicates that yard waste and other compostable
materials comprise approximately 16-21% of the waste
generated in the City (20-27 tons per day of City waste are
yard waste; 18% of 128 tons = 23 tons).
LOCATION
The facilities are located in the Unincorporated areas of
West San Bernardino Valley.
4
TABLE M-2
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NDFE
YUKON DISPOSAL
CONSOLIDATED VOLUME TRANSPORTERS
FACT SHEET
TYPE OF FACILITY
Consolidated Volume Transporters(C.V.T.) Material
RecoveryFacility uses sorting lines and machinery. This
Facility sorts Glass, Tin, etc.
AMOUNT OF WASTE
SENT TO FACILITY
Approximately 3.7 tons per day of recyclables are delivered
to this facility by Yukon Disposal from the City of Rancho
Cucamonga.
EXPECTED DIVERSION
RATE
This facility averages a 85% to 93% recovery rate of
curbside products delivered to its facility. Those products are
sold to recyclers and re-processed and brought back into the
market place when operating at full capacity approximately
3,800 tons per day are being from the landfills.
LOCATION
Consolidated Volume Transporters is located at 1131 N.
Blue Gum St., Anaheim, CA 92815.
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
August 3, 1994
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
Mayor. and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
Rick Gomez, Community Development Director
Karen McGuire-Emery, Associate Park Planner
SUBJECT:
VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 94-02 - CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA - A request to amend the Victoria Community
Plan pertaining to the timing of the construction of
Ellena Park.
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Commission recommends approval of the
amendment to the Victoria Community Plan pertaining
construction of E11ena Park.
proposed
to the
ANALYSIS
The City has receivedwritten notice from the William Lyon Company,
Master Developer of the Victoria Planned Community, that due to
financial constraints, the company has no interest now or in the
near future of constructing the Ellena Park improvements in the
Vineyards South village. The five Merchant Builders developing
Vineyards South, represented by Lewis Homes, are requesting to
fulfill the William Lyon Company's obligation to construct Ellena
Park. Although the timing of construction will be slightly
extended, the Merchant Builders are anxious to complete the park
improvements to enhance their developments and to comply with the
development guidelines.
The proposed amendment will allow construction of the park to be
completed by the Merchant Builders in two phases. Phase i will
occur prior to issuance of 350 Building Permits and completion of
the entire facility will occur by issuance of 450 permits. This
sched le differs from the Community Plan which currently calls for
comp tion of facility by 200 Building Permits.
Re tf submitted,
R'
ent Director
Attachments:
Exhibit "A" - Letter From Applicant
Exhibit "B" - Ellena Park Plan
July 13, 1994 Planning Commission Staff Report
July 13, 1994 Planning Commission Minutes
Planning Commission Resolution 94-63
Ordinance for VCPA 94-02
Lewis Homes Management Corp.
1156 North Mountain Avenue / P.O. Box 670 / Upland, California 91785-0670
909/985-0971 FAX: 909/949-6700
June 28, 1994
Mr. Steven Hayes
Assistant Planner
City of Rancho Cucamonga
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91729
Re= Victoria Community Plan Amendment
Dear Steve:
The Victoria Community Plan requires that Ellena Park be
constructed before more than 200 building permits can be issued for
projects in the Vineyards South village. On behalf of the builders
in the Vineyards South village ('*Merchant Builders"), ~his letter
is to request that the Victoria Community Plan be amended to
increase the number of building permits that can be issued to the
amounts that are described below.
This request is precipitated because the Victoria master developer,
who had built the previous parks in Victoria, will not build Ellena
Park, and neither will the City of Rancho Cucamonga ("City"). Per
the terms of the Memorandum of Understanding Regarding Construction
of Ellena Park between the Merchant Builders and the City, the
Merchant Builders have assumed the obligation to construct Ellena
Park.
The City needs to amend the Victoria Community Plan so that the
City will issue up to a maximum of 350 building permits prior to
the completion of the first phase of improvements, which are
described on the attached exhibit. After the completion of the
first phase of improvements, the City will issue up to 100
additional building permits for units within the Vineyards South
village, at which time the improvements to Ellena Park must be
completed.
101
Mr. Steven Hayes
City of Rancho Cucamonga
June 28, 1994 - page two
The proposed Victoria Community Plan amendment needs to be
processed in a timely manner since the City continues to issue
building permits and the Merchant Builders are proceeding with the
Ellena Park improvements. Thank you for your assistance.
Sincerely,
LEWIS HOMES MANAGEMENT CORP.
Gary ~~Luque
Manager of Special Projects
~HL/dm
Enclosure
cc:
Karen McGuire-Emery, City of Rancho Cucamonga
Jim Young, Brock Homes
Gary Peterson, Premier Homes
Michael Aller, Centex Homes
Tom Matreyek, Matreyek Homes
Joe Manisco, Lewis Homes
102
~0
wF--X X IKSiT Eb
CONCEPTUAL CONSTRUCTION PHASING PLAN
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
-- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
July 13, 1994
Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
Rick Gomez, Community Development Director
Karen McGuire-Emery, Associate Park Planner
VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLANAMENDMENT 94-02 - An Amendment to
the Victoria Planned Community Pertainin~ to the Timing
of Construction of Parks.
ABSTRACT: The purpose of this review is to consider a request from
the "Merchant Builders" of the Vineyards South village within the
master planned community of Victoria to increase the number of
dwelling units allowed prior to the completion of Ellena Park.
BACKGROUND: With approval of the Victoria Community Plan in 1981,
a provision for the development of park acreage was adopted as
follows:
"Each park area within each village shall be dedicated to
the City in a complete form including, but not limited to,
installed parking areas, seeded play areas, irrigation and
restrooms prior to the construction of greater than 200
dwelling units of the lots within the village. Park design
shall be to the satisfaction of the Director of Community
Services and consistent with the Victoria Planned Communities
and reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission.,,
To date, the four parks constructed in the Victoria Planned
Community have been built by the William Lyon Company per the
provisions as stated above. Over the last few years however, the
Lyon Company has sold rights to develop homes in Victoria,
specifically in the Vineyards South development, to five other
"Merchant Builders". These builders include M.J. Brock & Sons,
Inc. ("Brock"), Lewis Homes ("Lewis"), PGI, LTD., No. 38
("Premier"), Mill Albin Matreyek ("Matreyek,,), and Centex Real
E~tate Corporation, ("Centex"). Through the agreement that the
Lyon Company has with these Merchant Builders, the builders are
required to deposit their park fees into an escrow account where
the money is to be held for construction of the park in the
Vineyards South Development. This agreement also allows any of the
builders to step into Lyon's place and use these funds (and future
funds collected) to construct the park.
ANALYSIS: Due to financial constraints the Lyon Company is now
experiencing, it has no interest in building the Ellena Park
project now or in the near future. The Merchant Builders however,
would like to see the project completed as a marketing'tool to
enhance their developments and are wanting to assume the obligation
to construct Ellena Park using the money in the escrow account. As
of May 12, 1994, the escrow account had approximately $407,000.00
on deposit. Construction of the entire 6.5 acre facility is
estimated to cost $1.1 Million. For this reason, the builders are
proposing that the park be constructed in two phases.
The Park and Recreation Commission at their May 19 meeting reviewed
the proposed options and recommends that construction of the park
occur in the following manner:
Phase I
- Restroom
- Picnicking amenities (tables and barbecues)
- Play area
- Parking lot
- Turf the remaining area for open play (including the future
ballfield)
- Security lighting
Phase II
- Exercise stations
- Volleyball court
- Basketball courts
- Ballfield installation
It is estimated that the construction of Phase I will cost
$600,000.00. For this reason, the Merchant Builders are requesting
that the Victoria Community Plan be amended =o increase the number
of building permits to be issued prior to the completion of the
first phase of construction from 200 to 350 which will thus
increase the amount of park fees collected in the escrow account to
allow Phase I construction to occur. In addition, after the
completion of the first phase of improvements, the Merchant
Builders request that the City issue up to 100 additional building
permits for units within the Vineyards South village, at which time
the improvements to Ellena Park must be completed.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission
modify the Victoria Community Plan to allow the construction of
Ellena Park to occur in two phases; amend the number of building
permits issued prior to the completion of the first phase of
construction of Ellena Park from 200 to 350; and further, allow the
issuance of an additional 100 permits at which time the
imp ovemen o E11ena Park must be completed.
Re ully submitted,
z
Development Director
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Letter From Applicant
xhlblt "B" Ellena Park Plan
105
Brad Bull,r, City Planner, invited the Commissioners
be held at City Hall at 12:00 noon on July 14, 1994, regarding Best Buy.
Mr. Buller announced that Associate Planners Steve Hayes, '~ ll,
Scott Murphy, and Alan Warren had recently received word tha had passed
the examination to become members of the American Inst~4~e of Certified
Planners.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES ~r~"
Motion: Moved by Lumpp, se~g~ed by Melcher, carried 3-0-0-2 with McNiel and
Tolstoy abstaining, to a~o~t the minutes of the Adjourned Meeting of May 25,
on: Moved , seconded by Melcher, carried 4-0-0-1 with Tolstoy
abstaining, adopt the minutes of the Adjourned Meeting of June 8, 1994.
Moti Moved by McNiel, seconded by Lumpp, carried 4-0-0-1 with Tolstoy
~uop= =~e minutes oz June ~, I~4. .
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Be
VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 94-02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - An
amendment to the Victoria Planned Community pertaining to the timing of
construction of parks.
Karen McGuire-Emery, Associate Park Planner, presented the staff report and
indicated a proposed resolution had been provided.
Commissioner Melcher asked if one developer would be acting as a spokesperson
for the group.
Ms. McGuire-Emery replied that Lewis Homes is. the spokesperson.
Commissioner Melcher noted that is the same company that is constructing
La Mission Park, which seems to be stalled. He asked how many units have been
constructed and how many permits have been issued.
Ms. McGuire-Emery replied that 254 permits have been issued and they are still
in construction on some of those units. She stated there are 626 units for
the total development, so that the 450 permits would still be well under the
626 final number of units.
Commissioner Melcher asked if the park is graded as it is intended to be
built.
Planning Commission Minutes
-2- JUly 13, 1994
106
Ms. McGuire-Emery replied it is rough graded.
Commissioner Melcher observed that construction debris has been dumped on the
site. He asked if staff knew when it was dumped.
Ms. McGuire-Emery responded staff did not know who had dumped the debris or
when it was dumped.
Commissioner Melcher asked if the City will eventually become the owner of the
park.
Ms. McGuire-Emery replied it will be dedicate to the City prior to final
completion of Vineyards South.
Commissioner Melcher asked if the City has or will require a Phase I site
assessment for hazardous materials.
Ms. McGuire-Emery said one could be required.
Chairman Barker opened the public hearing.
Gary Luque, Lewis Homes, P. O. Box 670, Upland, stated he represents the
Merchant Builders who are requesting an amendment to the Victoria Community
Plan. He stated he did not know who had placed the debris on site but they
would be willing to do a site assessment to be sure the City does not inherit
a hazardous condition. He said plans for Elena Park have already been updated
and are in plan check. He mentioned the La Mission Park is currently in its
third plan check.
Commissioner Tolstoy asked who would be responsible for building the park now
that there is a group of Merchant Builders.
Mr. Luque replied that Lewis Homes is the lead builder and will be responsible
for processing the plans and constructing the park. He said they have their
own in-house landscape architect involved with the project who will see it
through.
Commissioner Melcher asked if the park design architect is still RJM.
Mr. Luque replied affirmatively.
Commissioner Melcher asked if RJM would be doing construction administration.
Ms. McGuire-Emery replied they are normally called out as necessary for design
clarification and meetings. She said they will technically work for the
Merchant Builders but the City can request that they be there and they have
been very responsive in the past.
Commissioner Melcher did not object to the aplicant's request, but he felt it
was important to continue the design landscape architect on the team through
the project. He felt it incumbent that a Phase I site assessment be required
for hazardous materials.
Planning Commission Minutes
-3- July 13, 1994
Brad Bullet, City Planner, observed that the action before the Commission was
an amendment. He suggested that the Commission could direct the Community
Development Director to take appropriate measures by minute action.
Chairman Barker asked if the City can hold one company and one person
responsible.
Mr. Luque replied that there are a series of agreements involved with the
project: 1) An agreement whereby the Merchant Builders assumes the
obligation from The William Lyon Company; 2) An agreement amongst the
Merchant Builders establishing Lewis Homes as the lead builder; and 3) An
agreement between the Merchant Builders and the City.
Hearing no further testimony, Chairman Barker closed the public hearing.
Commissioner McNiel agreed about the possibility of toxics and the need for an
assessment. He also concurred that the team designing the project should be
kept in place.
Commissioners Lumpp and Tolstoy agreed.
Motion: Moved by Melcher, seconded by McNiel, to adopt the resoXution
recommending approval of Victoria Community Plan Amendment 94-02 with minute
action to direct the Community Development Director to require a Phase I site
assessment for toxic materials and to require that RJM continue with the park
project. Motion carried by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
BARKER, LUMPP, MCNIEL, MELCHER, TOLSTOY
NONE
NONE -carried
-.~_~ary modular classroom structure for an existing school on 5.6 acres
of la~the Medium Residential District, located at 9974 19th Street -
APN: 1076~~_~.
Steve Hayes, Associate Plann~-~p~eJented the staff report.
Commissioner McNiel asked if Design Revfew~comments had been incorporated into
the resolution.
Mr. Hayes ree~nded affi~atively. He said a revieW. site plan had been
submitted and the modular structure had been moved as '~ed by the
co~ittee.
- Co~issioner Lumpp asked if staff was satisfied with the change.
Mr. Hayes responded affirmatively.
Planning Commission Minutes
-4- July 13, 1994
108
RESOLUTION NO. 94-63
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF
VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 94-02, TO MODIFY THE
COMMUNITY PLAN TEXT PERTAINING TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF
ELLENA PARK, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF.
A. Recitals.
1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an application for
Victoria Community Plan Amendment No. 94-02, as described in the title of this
Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Victoria Community
Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application."
2. On the 13th day of July 1994, the Planning Commission of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application
and concluded said hearing on that date.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts
set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced public hearing on July 13, 1994, including written
and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby
specifically finds as follows:
a. This amendment does not conflict with Land Use Policies of
the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a
manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and
b. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the
Land Use Element; and
c. That the proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the
public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity; and
d. That the proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the
objectives or the General Plan or the Development Code; and
e. The Victoria Community Plan calls for construction of Ellena
Park prior to the completion of the 200th dwelling unit in the Vineyards South
Village; and
109
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 94-63
VCPA 94-02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
July 13, 1994
Page 2
f. The cost of construction of the 6.5 acre Ellena Park is
estimated at $1.1 million; and
g. The Merchant Builders of Victoria Vineyards South Village pay
park development fees into an escrow account established by the William Lyon
Company; and
h. At the issuance of the 200th building permit in the Vineyards
South Village there will not be adequate funds to complete the Ellena Park
improvements; and
i. Because of current funding constraints, the Merchant Builders
are proposing to complete the Ellena Park improvements in two phases; and
j. In order to provide adequate funding for the completion of
Phase I of Ellena Park the number of building permits must be increased from
200 to 350 and the number of permits issued in order to complete final
improvements must be increased to 450.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of
facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and
concludes as follows:
a. That the proposed amendment would not have significant
impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and
b. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the
General Plan.
4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been prepared
and reviewed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of
1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, and further,
specifically finds that based upon substantial evidence, it can be seen with
certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed amendment will have a
significant effect on the environment and, therefore, the proposed amendment
is exempt pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15061(b)(3).
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs
1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby resolves as follows=
a. That the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
hereby recommends that the City Council approve and adopt Victoria Community
Plan Amendment 94-02 to modify the Community Plan Text for the Completion of
Ellena Park as follows:
(1) Condition #4 of "Parks/Open Space" of Resolution
No. 81-37 is hereby amended to add the following:
"E11ena Park, within the Victoria Vineyards South
Village, shall be built in two phases. Phase 1 shall
be constructed prior to the issuance of the 351st
110
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 94-63
VCPA 94-02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
July 13, 1994
Page 3
building permit within the village and the entire park
shall be completed prior to the issuance of the the
451st building permit. The park shall be dedicated to
the City in a completed form and shall include
installed parking area, turf area, picnicking
amenities, tot lot, volleyball court, basketball
courts, improved ball field, irrigation and rest
rooms. Park design shall be to the satisfaction of
the Director of Community Development and consistent
with the Victoria Community Plan and reviewed and
approved by the Planning Commission."
(b) That the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
hereby recommends approval of Victoria Community Plan Amendment 94-02 to
modify the Victoria Community Plan for the construction of Ellena Park per the
attached Ordinance.
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of
this Resolution.
APPROVED AND Annm~ THIS 13TH DAY OF JULY 1994.
PLANN ~e~__SSION O/THE ~ OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY: ~,~~ ~
E Da Barker
ATTEST: ,
I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Co~nission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 13th day of July 1994, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES:
COMMISSIONERS: BARKER, LUMPP, MCNIEL, MELCHER, TOLSTOY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS= NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
111
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN
AMENDMENT 94-02, TO MODIFY THE. COMMUNITY PLAN TEXT
PERTAINING TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF ELLENA PARK, AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF.
A. Recitals.
(i) On July 13, 1994, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing with respect to the above-
referenced Victoria Community Plan Amendment. Following the conclusion of
said public hearing the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 94-63,
thereby recommending that the City Council adopt Victoria Community Plan
Amendment No. 94-02.
(ii) On August 3, 1994, the City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing and concluded said hearing
prior to its adoption of this Ordinance.
(iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this
Resolution have occurred.
B. Ordinance.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga ordains as follows:
Section 1: This Council hereby specifies and finds that all of the
facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and
correct.
Section 2: The Rancho Cucamonga City Council finds as follows:
a. The proposed amendment would not have significant adverse impacts
on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and
b. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan.
Section 3: This Commission hereby finds that the project has been
reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental
Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder,
and further, specifically finds that based upon substantial evidence, it can
be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed
amendment will have a significant effect on the environment and, therefore,
the proposed amendment is exempt pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines,
Section 15061(b)(3).
Section 4: The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby
approves the Victoria Community Plan Amendment 94-02 to modify the Community
Plan Text for the completion of Ellena Park as follows:
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO.
VCPA 94-02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
August 3, 1994
Page 2
Condition #4 of "Parks/Open Space" of Planning Commission
Resolution No. 81-37, adopted by City Council Ordinance
No. 143, is hereby amended to add the following:
"Ellena Park, within the Victoria Vineyards South Village,
shall be built in two phases. Phase 1 shall be constructed
prior to the issuance of the 351st building permit within the
village and the entire park shall be completed prior to the
issuance of the the 451st building permit. The park shall be
dedicated to the City in a completed form and shall include
installed parking area, turf area, picnicking amenities, tot
lot, volleyball court, basketball courts, improved ball
field, irrigation and rest rooms. Park design shall be to
the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development and
consistent with the Victoria Community Plan and reviewed and
approved by the Planning Commission."
Section 5: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this
Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days
after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a
newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California,
and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 3RD DAY OF AUGUST 1994.
113
f
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
August 3, 1994
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
Rick Gomez, Community Development Director
CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE AGREEMENT
FOR THE RECIPROCAL WAIVER OF FEES BETWEEN
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND CHINO BASIN
MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT
RF. COMMENDATION
The City Council approve the attatched Agreement for the reciprocal waiver of fees
between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Chino Basin Municipal Water District
Analysis
The Chino Basin Municipal Water District and City staff have discussed the reciprocal
waiver of fees for public projects. The purpose of the waiver is to insure that our citizens
are not obligated to pay fees which are designed and structured to assess private
development for impacts on public improvements which are themselves part of the public
infrastructure.
These discussions were aimed at the reciprocal waiver of fees for the Sports Complex and
with the approval of this Agreement the fees for the Sports Complex would be waived
along with any future public projects. The City Attorncy's office has reviewed the
attached Agreement and recommends its approval.
.
Re ec'tf 'tted,
/I' '- ~.
ment Director
Attachment: Agreement
114
AGREEMENT FOR WAIVER OF FEES
THIS AGREEMENT is entered into as of the 3rd day of August, lg94, by and
between THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ("The City") and CHINO BASIN MUNICIPAL
WATER DISTRICT ("Chino Basin").
RECITALS
The City and Chino Basin have determined that it is in their mutual best
interest that they waive the payment by each other of their respective fees,
as hereinafter identified, with regard to their respective public facilities
such as the Ctty's Adult Sports Complex and Chino Basins Regional Plant No. 4
and any future public projects initiated by either agency, as such facilities
are public facilities and the imposition and payment of such fees is therefore
adverse to the interests of the residents and sewer users of the communities
which they serve.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed as follows:
1. The City shall not charge to or collect from Chino Basin, The City's
Building Fees, Development Fees, and Encroachment Fees which are identified in
The Ctty's current ordinances as; the City's Building, Electrical, Plumbing,
Mechanical and Sewer Permits; The City's Transportation, Beauttftcation, Park,
and Drainage funds; and The City's Encroachment Fees for all work in the
Public Right-of-way, as well as all Plan Check Fees whether the plan checking
is done by Inhouse staff or through consultants; and The City hereby waives
payment of such fees with respect to Regional Plant No. 4 and any new public
facility of Chino Basin which may hereafter be constructed in the City.
2. Chino Basin shall not charge to or collect from The City, Chino
Basin's connection fee which is referred to in the Chino Basin Regional Sewage
Service Contract {as amended) as the "Capital Capacity Reimbursement Payment"
115
as well as all Plan Check Fees whether the plan checking is done by inhouse
staff or through consultants with respect to City Adult Sports Complex and any
new public facility of the City which may hereafter be constructed and
connected to Cucamonga's sewer system or the sewer system of any other Dubl ic
agency which is a party to the aforementioned contract, and Chino Basin hereby
waives payment by The City of any such charge.
3. The foregoing waiver of Fees shall not waive compliance with any
statutory or required Development Review procedures and appl lcable standards
as may be required by City or District.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this agreement to be
executed as of the date first above written.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ATTEST:
BY:
Mayor of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk
CHINO BASIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT
ATTEST:
By:
President of the Board of Ulrectors
Secretary of the Board of Directors
116
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
August 3, 1994
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager
Rick Gomez, Community Development Director
W. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer
ROUTE 30 AD HOC TASK FORCE
The City Council directed staff to develop a suggested form of a community-wide Ad
Hoc Task Force whose purpose would be to advise the City Council on issues relative to
the proposed Route 30 Freeway. In order to represent the City at large, the Ad Hoc Task
Force should be as broad based as possible, however, not so large as to become
ineffectual. It is suggested the Ad Hoc Task Force be comprised of the following:
~ 1 Councilmember
D 1 Member of the Planning Commission
72 Members from C-Car (Concerned Citizens
About Route 30)
//D . 1 Member of the Chamber of Commerce ( C /73/.)
4! Residents from the Cucamonga Area
Residents from the Etiwanda Area
Residents from the Alta Loma Area
In addition, the City Council may wish to modify this suggested format based on the
public input and discussion at the August 3, 1994 City Council meeting.
The Ad Hoc Task Force will establish their own meeting schedule to allow the group to
inform itself on the existing information from the various agencies who are conducting
the actual environmental review and design of the project. It is also recommended that
the Ad Hoc Task Force be staffed by the Community Development staff as needed.
The Ad Hoc Task Force will be advisory to the City Council with results coming forward
in the form of general fact finding conclusions and recommendations based on the
general consensus of the group.
At this time, the actual completion dates for the freeway construction are not clear. It is
envisioned that the Ad Hoc Task Force will be advisory to the City Council and would
stay in existence until such time as the City Council wishes the Ad Hoc Task Force to
stay in place.
!/
sp~ully Sub ,
Re
nt
Director
j
117
f
OATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
August 3, 1994
Mayor and Members of the City Council ~:
Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager
Rick Gomez, Community Development Director
Will faro J. O'Neil, City Engineer
STATUS REPORT ON GRAFFITI REMOVAL PROGRAM - CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
ITEM I-1
With the concurrence of Councilman Gutierrez the graffitt report requested by
Council for the August 3, 1994 meeting will be presented at the August 17
meeting. This will allow staff time to gather additional information for a
complete report. Any questions can be directed to either ~yself, Joe O'Neil
or Jerry Ful wood. ·
Respectful 1 y
R'
C ty Development Director
RG:WjO:dlw
118
DATE:
T0:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
August 3, 1994
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
Robert Dominguez
Administrative Services Department
Brigit K. Tare
Risk Management Analyst
REQUESTING APPROVAL FROM CITY COUNCIL TO INITIATE
LITiGATiON FOR BREECH OF CONTRACT FOR REPAIR OF WATER
TRUCK DAMAGED AS A RESULT OF A TRAFFIC COLLISION
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council authorize City Attorney to
file and pursue litigation against Tony Benigno owner of Hydrotech
for breech of contract for repair of the City's water truck.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
On August 9, 1994, the Clty's water truck was involved in a roll
over traffic collision with a non-insured motorist, causing major
damage to the entire truck. The City Fleet Maintenance Department
followed the bid process to find a vendor for repair of the truck.
Hydrotech was awarded the bid since to they had originally built
the truck and came in as low bid. On November 17, 1993, the City
had the water truck towed to Hydrotech to begin repair work. On or
about December 15, 1993, Tony Benigno contacted the City for 60%
payment up front to begin repair work as required in the estimate
for repairs. On December 20, 1993, the City hand delivered warrant
number 82778 in the amount of $11,800 to Hydrotech in order to
begin repair work. The contract was written that the City could
expect delivery within 30 days from receipt of the money. Many
telephone calls were made by Fleet Maintenance to check on the
status of the work from january until May 3, 1994. Tony Benigno
assured us the truck was being repaired, however, he was having
difficulty receiving parts due to the earthquake and the truckers
strike.
EXECUTIVE SESSION CiTY COUNCIL
STAFF REPORT REQUESTING APPROVAL FOR LITIGATION
August 3, 1994
Page Number Two
On May 3, 1994, the City hand delivered a breech of contract letter
to Tony Benigno demanding our money and the return of the water
truck. On this date, the water truck was towed back to the City
Yard. Tony Benigno wanted to avoid any litigation and came to an
agreement with Dave B!evins that he would provide the cab and water
tank for the truck and then we would call the $11,800 even, with
City Fleet Maintenance to perform repair work. To this date, we
have received a water tank however, we have not received the cab
nor have we heard from Tony Benigno, despite our repeated efforts
to contact him.
CONCLUSION
City Staff recommends approval to proceed with litigation for
breech of contract against Tony Benigno owner of Hydrotech for
$11,800 for the warrant amount, any tow bills incurred, or any
future parts needed to complete the repair as well as attorney fees
to defend this litigation. The City Attorney's office has been
kept advised of the matter and is prepared to move ahead.
Respectfully submitted,
Director
RCD/BKT/bkt
DATE:
TO:.
FROM:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MEMORANDUM
August 3, 1994
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jan Sutton, Deputy City Cler._k~ CSL2'.'''''
CORRECTION TO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA
On the Redevelopment Agency agenda for August 3, 1994 under the Consent Calendar, the f'trst
item is for the approval of the minutes from July 20, 1994.
This is in error, and the item should read:
1. Approval of Minutes: June 15, 1994
The correct minutes were included in your agenda packages.
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
August 2, 1994
Mayo~ and Members of the City Coun '1
Rex Gutierrez, Council Member ~
STATUS OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION TASK FORCE
C1TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MEMORANDUM
This memorandum is intended to up date you on the activities of the Historic
Preservation Mitigation Task Force· You may recall the Task Force is composed
of myself along with Planning/Historic Preservation Co-w-issioners John Melcher
and Peter Tolstoy- Our responsibility is to formulate a Draft Policy and
recomendation on Mitigations for demolition or modifications to Historical
Resources in the Co~nunity.
The Task Force has met a total of three times, during which the members have
reviewed an overall Draft Policy which includes a demolition donation/fee
formula· The major parts of the Policy contain the following features:
Require an adequate economic feasibility study for adaptive reuse of
historic structures.
2. Require architectural documentation of structure/s prior to
demolition.
3- Oral History sponsorship/s.
4. Relocation of historic structures whenever feasible.
5. Design and installation of interpretire historical displays
depicting a site's historic qualities.
Donation of historical artifacts or materials to the City or other
appropriate organization.
Contribution of money to an organization or group that promotes
historic preservation, based upon a specified formula.
The Task Force is now focusing its efforts on the design of the monetary
formula. The formula as well as all the mitigations are based upon all the
other City actions relative to previous projects that have had a negative
environmental impact on Historic structures in the community. The current
draft formula is based upon both a structure replacement value and parcel size
aspect. In addition, there is a value based upon the relative historic value
of the subject structure and its relationship to the co~nunity. However,
before proceeding further, staff has been directed to conceptually or
theoretically test the formula on three historic sites in the City and present
the results back to the Task Force.
Thank you for your attention. If you have any questions or coments please
contact me at your earliest convenience-
RG:mlg
cc:
Jack Lam, City Manager
Rick Gomez, Community Development Director
Brad Bullet, City Planner