HomeMy WebLinkAbout1994/06/15 - Agenda PacketCITY COUNCIL
AGENDA
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
REGULAR MEETINGS
1st and 3rd Wednesdays - 7:00 p.m.
June 15, 1994
Civic Center
Council Chambers
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730
City Councilmemberl
Dennis L. Stout, Mayor
Charles J. Buquet, Mayor Pro Tem
William J. Alexander, Councamember
Rex Gutierrez, Councilmember
Diane WilliAms, Councilmember
Jack Lain, City Manager
James L Marirm an, City Attorney
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk
City Ofrice: 989-1851
City Council Agenda
June 15, 1994
All items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in
writing. The deadline for submitting these items is 6:00
p.m. on the Tuesday prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's
Office receives all such items.
PAGE
A. CAII TO ORDFR
RoliCall: Buquet , AJexander ,Stout
Willhams , and Gutierrez
B, ANNOUNCFMENTS/PRESENTATIONS
Presentation of Cedi~cate of Recognition to Deputy Tim Masters
by the City of Upland for his participation in the Third Annual
D.A.R.E. Fair.
Presentation to the Finance Department for Receiving the
Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting
for Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 1993.
Presentation of Proclamation to James Clark for his Lifelong
Contribution to the Community and the Preservation of our History.
C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
This is the time and place for the general public to address
the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from
addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda.
The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter
for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five
minutes per individual.
D. CONSFNT CAI FNDAR
The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be
routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by
the Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be
removed by a Councilmember or member of the audience for
discussion.
1. Approval of Minutes: May 18, 1994
t
10.
City Council Agenda
June 15, 1994
Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 5/25/94 and 6/1/94; and
Payroll ending 5/19/94 for the total amount of $1 ~57,111.21.
Approval of Investment Schedule for the pedod ending May 31,
1994.
Approval to surplus aCE Microfilm Reader/Printer.
Approval of Temporary Variance of Sports Field Lighting at Red
Hill Community Park for June 25 and 27, 1994.
Approval to grant the Amateur Radio Operators group use of
Heritage Park Equestrian Center for Field Day Cam aetition on June
24, 25 and 27, 1994,
Approval of the Second Annual Cal Net Horse Show to be held at
the Heritage Park Equestrian Center.
Approval to reject all bids for the Bike Pathways and Lockers at
Various Locations.
Approval to order the annexation to Landscape Maintenance
District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6
for MDR 94-03, located on the north side of Fifth Street, east of
Milliken Avenue, submitted by Pomona First Federal Savings and
Loan Association.
RESOLUTION NO. 94-116
a RESOLUTION Of THE CITY COUNCIL Of THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING
THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1
AND 6 FOR MDR 94-03 (APN: 229-341-08)
Approval to execute Reimbursement Agreement for Installation
of a Portion of a Master Planned Storm Drain Facility in connection
with development of Tract No. 14866, located at the southeast
corner of Lemon Avenue and London Avenue, submitted by The
Pennhill Company.
PAGE
8
14
15
16
18
20
22
23
26
11.
12.
13.
City Council Agenda
June 15, 1994
I"'~ESOLUTION NO. 94-117
a RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CAUFORNIA, APPROVING
REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION
OF A PORTION OF A MASTER PLANNED STORM
DRAIN FACILITY IN CONNECTION WITH
DEVELOPMENT OF TRACT NO. 14866
Approval to execute Agreement (CO 94-045] with the County of
San Bemardino to provide Ubrary Services for the City of Rancho
Cucamonga during the transition pedod July 1, 1994 through
August 31, 1994.
Approval to execute Improvement Agreement, Improvement
Securities and Monumentation Cash Deposit for Tract 14121,
located at the southwest corner of Milliken and Highland
Avenues, submitted by K. Hovnanian Companies of Southern
California II, Incorporated and release of previously submitted
Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and Cash
Monumentation Deposit accepted by City Council on February 20,
1991, from Rhoades/San Juan, A California Limited Partnership.
RESOLUTION NO. 94-118
a RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAUFORNIA, APPROVING
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT
SECURITIES AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT
FOR TRACT 14121 AND RELEASING THE
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT. IMPROVEMENT
SECURITY AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT
PREVIOUSLY ACCEPTED BY CITY COUNCIL ON
FEBRUARY 20, 1991
Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for
Tract 13281, located on the northwest corner of Base Line Road
and Rochester Avenue, submitted by Brock Homes.
RESOLUTION NO. 94-119
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13281
PAGE
28
29
3O
32
34
36
City Council Agenda
June 15, 1994
14.
Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for
Tract 13114, located on the southeast comer of Vineyard Avenue
and Calle Del Prado, submitted by Bayoun Development.
RESOLUTION NO. 94-120
a RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL Of THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPI'~)VING
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13114
15.
Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for
Tract 14644, located at the east end of Camellia Court east of Beryl
Street, submitted by Jorge Garcia.
RESOLUTION NO. 94-121
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CAUFORNIA, APPF~)VING
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 14644
16.
Approval to accept Improvements, Release of Bonds and Notice
of Completion for Tract 10210. located on the north side of Almond
Street west of Sapphire Street.
Relense Faithful Performnnce Bond
Streets
Undergrounding
S 1284J:]:]0.[]0
535J~0.00
Accer~t Maintenance Guarnntee Bond
Streets
Undergrounding
128~1[:]0.00
53~C0.00
RESOLUTION NO. 94-122
a RESOLUTION Of THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CiTY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING
THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 10210 AND
AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
PAGE
4
37
39
40
42
43
44
City Council Agenda
June 15, 1994
PAGE
F. CONSFNT ORDINANCFS
The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time
of first reading. Second readings are expected to be routine
and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the
Council at one time without discussion. The City Clerk will
read the title. Any item can be removed for discussion.
CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND
INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PI AN AMENDMENT 93-03 - GENERAL
DYNAMICS - A proposed amendment to create a new Subarea
18, bounded on the south by 4th Street, on the east by Milliken
Avenue, on the north by the A.T. & S.F. (Metrolink) Railroad, and
on the west by Cleveland Avenue and Utica Avenue, and other
related amendments to provide consistency with the Subarea 18
Specific Plan - APN: 209-272-01,04, 07, and 08; 210-081-22 and 23; 210-
082-02, 11, 17, 37, 38 and 39; and 210-361-01 through 26.
ORDINANCE NO. 524 (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE crrY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAUFORNIA, APPROVING
INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 93-03,
A REQUEST TO AMEND THE INDUSTRIAL AREA
SPECIFIC PLAN TO ESTABLISH A SUBAREA 18. AND
OTHER RELATED AMENDMENTS, IN CONJUNCTION
WITH THE SUBAREA 18 SPECIFIC PLAN, FOR 380
ACRES OF LAND BOUNDED ON THE SOUTH BY 4TH
STREET, ON THE EAST BY MILLIKEN AVENUE, ON THE
NORTH BY THE A.T. & S.F. (METROLINK) RAILROAD,
AND ON THE WEST BY CLEVELAND AND UTICA
AVENUES, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN:
209-272-01,134, 07, AND 08; 210081-22 AND 23; 210-082-
02, 11,17, 37, 38, AND 39; AND 210-361-01 THROUGH 26
CONSIDERATION OF SPECIFIC PI AN 93-01 - GENERAL DYNAMICS - A
plan for the redevelopment of 380 acres of land that would include
recreational, commercial. and retail facilities surrounding an 18-
hole goff course, bounded on the south by 4th Street, on the east
by Milliken Avenue, on the nodh by the A.T. & S.F. (Metrolink)
Railroad, and on the west by Cleveland Avenue and Utica
Avenue.
45
City Council Agenda
June 15, 1994
ORDINANCE NO. 525 (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
SPECIFIC PLAN 93-01, THE SUBAREA 18 SPECIFIC PLAN,
AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF
PAGE
83
F. ADVFRTISFD PURl IC HFARINGS
The following items have been advertised and/or posted as
public hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the
meeting to receive public testimony.
1. CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION UPDATING THE CITY'S
COMPf?EHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE
RESOLUTION NO. 944391
a RESOLUTION Of THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REPEALING
RESOLUTION NOS. 93-035, 92-223-1,92-223-B, AND 92-
223-C AND ESTABLISHING A NEW COMPREHENSIVE
FEE SCHEDULE FOR PERMITS AND SERVICES
PROVIDED BY ALL CITY DEPARTMENTS, THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND THE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA POLICE DEPARTMENT BY
MODIFYING CERTAIN FEES ESTABLISHED IN
RESOLUTION 92-223.
CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL
PLAN AMENDMENT 94-01A - WESTERN LAND PROPERTIES- A
proposal to amend the General Plan Land Use Element Map to
change the land use designation from Office to Community
Commercial for 25 acres bounded by Foothill Boulevard on the
south, Spruce Avenue on the west, Church Street on the north, and
Elm Avenue on the east - APN: 1077-421-58 and 63. Related File:
Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment 94-01. Planning
Commission recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration.
87
88
117
City Council Agenda
June 15, 1994
RESOLUTION NO. 94-. 123
a RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAUFORNIA, APPROVING
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 94--0lA TO AMEND THE
GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM OFFICE TO
COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL FOR 25 ACRES OF LAND
BOUNDED BY FOOTHILL BOULEVARD ON THE SOUTH,
SPRUCE AVENUE ON THE WEST, CHURCH STREET ON
THE NORTH, AND ELM STREET ON THE EAST AND
MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1077-
PAGE
7
136
G. PUBIIC HFARINGS
The following items have no legal
requirements. The Chair will open
public testimony.
publication or posting
the meeting to receive
No Items Submitted.
H. CITY MANAGFR'S STAFF RFPORTS
The following items do not legally require any public
testimony, although the Chair may open the meeting for
public Input.
1. CONSIDERATION OF MAI'rERS FOR THE NOVEMBER 8, 1994 ELECTION
RESOLUTION NO. 94.- 124
a RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL Of THE CITY Of
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CALLING AND
GIVING NOTICE OF GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO
BE HELD IN SAID CITY ON TUESDAY. THE 8TH DAY OF
NOVEMBER 1994. FOR THE ELECTION OF CERTAIN
OFFICERS OF THE CITY AS REQUIRED BY THE
PROVISIONS OF THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA RELATING TO GENERAL LAW CITIES.
AND CONSOLIDATING SAID ELECTION WITH
STATEWIDE GENERAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON SAID
DATE
139
140
City Council Agenda
June 15, 1994
RESOLUTION NO. 94-125
a RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY Of
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING a
CHARGE TO CANDIDATES FOR ELECTIVE OFFICE. FOR
PREPARATION OF MATERIALS SUBMITTED TO THE
ELECTORATE AND THE COSTS OF THE CANDIDATE'S
STATEMENT FOR THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION
TO BE HELD IN THE CiTY ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 8,
1994
RESOLUTION NO. 94.- 126
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CAUFORNIA, CALLING AND
GIVING NOTICE OF THE HOLDING OF A SPECIAL
MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD IN THE CITY ON
TUESDAY. THE EIGHTH (8TH) DAY OF NOVEMBER.
1994, SUBMI1TING A QUESTION TO THE ELECTORS OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CAUFORNIA.
CONCERNING WHETHER THE OFFICE OF CITY CLERK
SHALL BE APPOINTIVE
RESOLUTION NO. 94-127
(OPTIONAL)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CiTY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING
CERTAIN OF ITS MEMBERS TO FILE A WRITTEN
ARGUMENT REGARDING A CITY MEASURE
RESOLUTION NO. 94-128
(OPTIONAL)
a RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DIRECTING
THE CITY A'FrORNEY TO PREPARE AN IMPARTIAL
ANALYSIS
RESOLUTION NO. 94-129
(OPTIONAL)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING
FOR THE FILING OF REBUTTAL ARGUMENTS FOR CITY
MEASURES
PAGE
8
141
143
145
146
147
City Council Agenda
June 15, 1994
I. COUNCIl RUSINFSS
The following Items have been requested by the City Council
for discussion. They are not public hearing Items, although
the Chair may open the meeting for public Input.
C:ONSInERATION OF A RECOMMENDATION BY THE RANC:HO
~U~--AMONGA ~-OMMUNITY FOUNDATION TO FILL VACANCIES ON
ITS B~ARI'~ OF DIRECTORS
REQUEST BY MR. LUNDY TO HAVE A CITY ~-OUNCIL MEMBER
INSTALLED ON THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE ROUTE 66
VISITOR'S BUREAU
PAGE
9
148
J. InFNTIFICATION OF ITFMS FOR NFXT MFFTINR
This is the time for City Council to identify the Items they
wish to discuss at the next meeting. These items will not be
discussed at this meeting, only identified for the next
meeting,
K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THF PURl IC
This is the time and place for the general public to address
the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from
addressing any Issue not previously included on the Agenda.
The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter
for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five
minutes per individual.
L. ADJOURNMENT
MEETING TO RECESS TO EXECUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSS
LABOR NEGOTIATIONS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION
54957.6 TO GIVE ROBERT DOMINGUEZ, ADMINISTRATIVE
SERVICES DIRECTOR, DIRECTION IN REGARDS TO THE MEET
AND CONFER PROCESS WITH ALL EMPLOYEE GROUPS.
EXECUTIVE SESSION TO ADJOURN TO A BUDGET MEETING ON
JUNE 16, 1994, AT 6:00 P.M., TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL
CHAMBERS OF THE CIVIC CENTER.
City Council Agenda
June 15, 1994
PAGE
10
I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby
certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on
June 9, 1994, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per
Government Code 54953 at 10500 Civic Center Drive.
May 18, 1994
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Regular Meeting
A. CAIJ, TO ORDER
A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, May 18, 1994, in the Council
Chambers of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting
was called to order at 7:11 p.m. by Mayor Dennis L. Stout.
Present were Councilmembers: William J. Alexander, Charles J. Buquet II, Diane Williams, and Mayor Dennis L.
Stout.
Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Jerry B. Fulwood, Deputy City
Manager; Linda D. Daniels, RDA Manager; Rick Gomez, Community Development Director;, Brad Buller, City
Planner; Larry Henderson, Principal Planner;, Cindy Norris, Associate Planner; Joe O'Neil, City Engineer; Mike
Olivier, Sr. Civil Engineer; Bill Makshanoff, Building Official; Suzanne Ota, Community Services Manager; Bob
Dominguez, Administrative Services Director; Susan Stark, Finance Officer; Alex Ahumada, Administrative
Services Officer; Jim Frost, City Treasurer; Diane O'Neal, Management Analyst II; Susan Mickey, Management
Analyst I; Chief Dennis Michael, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Capt. Bruce Zeiner, Rancho
Cucamonga Police Department; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk.
Absent was Councilmember: Rex Gutierrez.
B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS
B 1. Presentation of Proclamations to concerned citizens for their help in apprehending a purse snatcher.
Mayor Stout presented the proclamations to all those involved with this incident.
B2. Presentation of Proclamation recognizing Emergency Medical Services Week.
Mayor Stout presented the proclamations to Mercy Ambulance Service and Chief Dennis Michael.
B3. Comments were made at this time in reference to Item I1, but the discussion is shown with that item under
Council Business.
City Council Minutes
May 18, 1994
Page 2
C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBI,IC
C 1. Presentation to the City Council from the Rancho Cucamonga Historic Route 66 Visitors Bureau on the
occasion of the Eleventh Annual National Tourist Appreciation Day.
Bob Lundy made a presentation to the Council.
C2.
Ernie Mansfield, 6556 Alameda, expressed disappointment of what happened at the last Route 30 meeting.
He felt it was not advertised very well and stated there were contradicting stories as to who would have
ultimate approval of the design of the freeway. He stated he was disappointed that the City would consider
this plan. He stated that originally he was told the freeway would be at ground level and is now told it will
be 30 feet above ground. He did not know why a City that is concerned with aesthetics would allow this.
He continued to state that he does not want to stop the freeway, but just change the design of it.
Rick Gomez, Community Development Director, stated staff is in communication with the residents that were at the
meeting. He stated staff was ready to receive comments from the residents, but did not expect 800 to 900 people.
Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, stated even though there were ads in the paper, they were surprised with the number of
people that were in attendance. He stated they will be ready at the June 8 meeting to address the concerns of the
people. He stated there is no approved set of plans at this time, and added staff wants to hear the comments from the
public in order to come up with a good design. He stated June 8, 7:00 p.m. will be the next meeting to be held at
Alta Loma High School Auditorium.
Councilmember Alexander stated he would like this agendized for the next meeting to discuss the format of how the
meeting would work for the June 8 meeting.
D. CONSENT CALENDAR
D 1. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 4/24/94 and 5/4/94; and Payroll ending 4/21/94 for the total amount
of $2,134,218.52.
D2. Approval to receive Investment Schedule for period ending April 30, 1994.
D3. Alcoholic Beverage Application for 20-Off Sale General for The Circle K Corporation, The Circle K
Corporation, 6760 Carnelian.
D4. Alcoholic Beverage Application for 20-Off Sale Beer & Wine for The Circle K Corporation, The Circle K
Corporation, 7287 Archibald Avenue.
D5. Alcoholic Beverage Application for On-Sale General Eating Place for Claim Jumper, Claim Jumper
Enterprises Incorporated, 12499 Foothill Boulevard.
D6. Alcoholic Beverage Application for On-Sale Beer & Wine Eating Place for Straw Hat Pizza, Gary Burbank,
8710 19th StreeL
D7. Approval to amend Fiscal Year 1993/94 Appropriations.
City Council Minutes
May 18, 1994
Page 3
D8. Approval to execute a Reimbursement Agreement for the Installation of a portion of a Master Planned
Storm Drain Facility in connection with development of Tract 13810, located in Ram Court extending from Hillside
Road northerly 680 feet, submitted by Mr. Vishnu Patel.
RESOLUTION NO. 94-094
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT
FOR INSTALLATION OF A PORTION OF A MASTER PLANNED STORM DRAIN
FACILITY IN CONNECTION WITH DEVELOPMENT OF TRACT 13810
D9. Approval to execute a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement from Reed Gibbons and
Cathryn Gibbons, for the Deferred Construction of Sidewalk and Street Trees adjacent to 8211 Cornwall Avenue,
located east of Etiwanda Avenue, south of Foothill Boulevard. ITEM PULLED FOR DISCUSSION BY
JIM FROST.
RESOLUTION NO. 94-095
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY
IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM REED GIBBONS
AND CATHRYN GIBBONS AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK
TO SIGN THE SAME (APN: 229-305-09)
D10. Approval of request by RCDC Associates, L.P. to consider declaring Assessment District 89-1
Improvement Funds as surplus, matter to be set for June 1, 1994.
Dll.
Site.
Approval to execute an Agreement (CO 94-036) with General Dynamics for acquisition of the Metrolink
D12. Approval to appropriate funds from Fund 12 - Transportation Development Act (TDA) Article 8 in an
amount of $326,000.00 and award and authorization for execution of contract (CO 94-025) for the Rancho
Cucamonga Metrolink Station, Phase I, located at Milliken Avenue and the Metrolink Railway, to Riverside
Construction for the amount of $3,119,728.70 ($2,836.117.00 plus 10% contingency), to be funded from Measure I,
Account No. 37-4637-9326, State Rail Bond Act, Account No. 36-4637-9326, and TDA Article 8, Account No. 12-
4637-9326. (Item continued from May 4, 1994)
D13. Approval to award and authorization to execute contract (CO 94-037) for Highland Avenue Improvement
Project, located from plus or minus 420 feet west of Locust Avenue to plus or minus 1,250 feet east of Locust
Avenue, to Eastland Construction Company, in the amount of $56,179.90 ($51,072.00 plus 10% contingency) to
funded from Proposition 111 Account No. 09-4637-9209.
D14. Approval to execute a Cooperative Agreement (CO 94-038) between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and
San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SANBAG) for the Design, Construction and Contract
Administration for the Milliken Avenue Project from Foothill Boulevard to Arrow Route.
City Council Minutes
May 18, 1994
Page 4
RESOLUTION NO. 94-096
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND EXECUTING THE
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AND SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY (SANBAG)
FOR THE FUNDING OF THE DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION AND CONTRACT
ADMINISTRATION FOR THE MILLIKEN AVENUE PROJECT FROM FOOTHILL
BOULEVARD TO ARROW ROUTE
D15. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 13565-5 thru -10, located on the
northeast corner of Summit Avenue and Wardman Bullock Road, submitted by Standard Pacific.
RESOLUTION NO. 94-097
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13565-5 THRU -10
D16. Approval to accept Improvements, Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion for Tract 13857, located on
the northwest comer of Milliken and Vintage Drive.
Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Streeo
Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street)
$94,000.00
9,400.00
RESOLUTION NO. 94-098
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR
TRACT 13857 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION
FOR THE WORK
D17. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 13063 located on the east side of East Avenue,
south of Highland Avenue.
Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond
$90,800.00
D18. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 13273 - Milliken Avenue Pedestrian
Undercrossing, located at Milliken Avenue south of Mt. View Drive.
Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond
$33,828.00
MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Williums to approve the balance of the staff recommendations in the staff
reports contained in the Consent Calendar with the exception of Item I)9. Motion carried unanimously, 4-0-1
(Gutierrez absent).
City Council Minutes
May 18, 1994
Page 5
DISCUSSION OF ITEM D9. Approval to execute a Real Property Improvement Contract and
Lien Agreement from Reed Gibbons and Cathryn Gibbons, for the Deferred Construction of
Sidewalk and Street Trees adjacent to 8211 Cornwall Avenue, located east of Etiwanda
Avenue, south of Foothill Boulevard.
Jim Frost, City Treasurer, asked that the adoption of the Resolution take place for this item, but asked that staff
withhold filing of the lien until such time as Council has had a chance to review the ramification of Ordinance 58.
He felt since this Ordinance was approved when the City was newly incorporated, that this item does not fit into the
intent of Ordinance 58. He hoped that the Council would agree that this does not make sense, and with the
withholding of the lien it would save both the City and homeowner the expense of having it removed at some future
date. He asked that the Council allow staff to give them a review of how this Ordinance works and where it does not
and that this be discussed further.
Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, stated he has talked with Mr. Frost before and felt there may be some equity with this
situation, but he stated that the Ordinance does require that before building permit be issued that this process be in
place.
James Markman, City Attorney, stated staff can hold the agreement and not record it, but felt it should still be
executed before the building permit is issued. He stated he agreed with Mr. Frost to investigate this further.
RESOLUTION NO. 94-095
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY
IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM REED GIBBONS
AND CATHRYN GIBBONS AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK
TO SIGN THE SAME (APN: 229-305-09)
MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Williams to approve Resolution No. 94-095, to execute the Real
Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement, but not record it at this time until further investigation is
made. Motion carried unanimously, 4-0-1 (Gutierrez).
No items were submitted.
CONSENT ORDINANCES
F. ADVERTISED PUBI,IC HEARINGS
F1. CONSIDF. RATION OF COMMUNITY DF. VF.I.OPMI~.NT BLOCK GRANT APPI.ICATION AND
FINAl. STAT!~.MENT FOR PROGRAM Y~.AR 1994/95 AND AMENDMENT TO THE 1992/93 AND 1993/94
FINAI. STATEMENTS FOR REPROGRAMMING OF FUNDS - The adoption of the Final Statement for
Community Development Objectives for program year 1994/95 and the final selection of projects based on a grant of
$800,000.00 and $7,745.00 in program income, and related amendments to the 1992/93 and 1993/94 Final
Statements. Staff report presented by Cindy Norris, Associate Planner.
City CouncilMinutes
May 18, 1994
Page 6
Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public heating. Addressing the Council were:
Barbara Hope, Executive Director for the House of Ruth, thanked the Council for their funding.
Kathy Rogers, Executive Director for YWCA, thanked the Council for their support of the teen program.
There being no further response, the public hearing was closed.
RESOLUTION NO. 94-099
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE FINAL STATEMENT OF
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES AND PROJECTED USE OF FUNDS
FOR THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM FOR
PROGRAM YEAR 1994/95 AND AMENDING THE 1992/93 AND 1993/94 FINAL
STATEMENTS FOR REPROGRAMMING OF FUNDS
Moved by Buquet, seconded by Alexander to approve Resolution No. 94-098. Motion carried
MOTION:
unanimously, 4-0-1 (Gu~errez absent).
No items were submitted.
No items were submitted.
G. PUBI.IC HEARINGS
It.
H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS
I. COUNCIl. BUSINESS
DISCUSSION OF OVERNIGHT PARKING ON CITY STREETS
Councilmember Buquet asked that since Councilmember Gutierrez was not present at this meeting to discuss item I1
that he had placed on the agenda, was there anyone present to hear this particular item, and if not, possibly this
should not be discussed tonight.
Jack Lam, City Manager, stated Councilmember Gutierrez has asked that this item be removed from the agenda at
this time.
MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Alexander to remove Item II from the agenda and to reagendize when
appropriate. Motion carried unanimously, 4-0-1 (Gutierrez absent).
City Council Minutes
May 18, 1994
Page 7
J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
J1. Councilmember Alexander stated he would like the discussion of the Route 30 meeting that was previously
brought up.
J2. Councilmember Buquet asked that a workshop be set up for the Council to discuss the shopping center in
order to re-evaluate the plans for it in order to try to get the project moving.
Mayor Stout felt this summer would be a good time after the budget is adopted and asked Jack Lain to start planning
for this.
K, COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBI.IC
KI.
Joyce Ecoff, Antler Peak Court, stated she is having problems with Marks Cablevision and continued to
explain her situation. She asked ff there was something the City could do to help get credit for the residents
that are without service.
Councilmember Buquet stated he and Councilmember Gutierrez serve as the Cable Subcommittee and are working
closely with staff to get their problems resolved with Marks Cablevision. He stated they are following up on this.
He suggested there be an update at the next meeting on the cable situation.
!., ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Williams to adjourn to an Executive Session to discuss personnel
matters regarding public employee discipline/release and for the Executive Session to adjourn to a Budget Workshop
to be held May 26, 1994 at 5:30 p.m. in the Tri-Communities Conference Room. Motion carried unanimously, 4-0-
1 (Gutierrez absent). The meeting adjourned at 8:06 p.m. with no action taken in Executive Session.
Respectfully submitted,
Debra J. Adams, CMC
City Clerk
Approved:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCRdONGA
LIST OF MARRANTS
FOR PERIOD: 05-25-96 (93/96)
RUN DATE: 05/25[96 PAGE:
VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO NARR. AMT,
1492 SAN BERN CO FLOOD CONTROL DEPT
4237 ALL DATA SERVICES
125 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INS.
6268 AaZLAe FRED
3366 8th AVENUE GRAPHICS
I A & A EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO.e INC.
962 A T & T
408 ADAMS~ DEBBIE
1826 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR
1135 ALIGNMENT & BRAKE SPECIALISTS
1167 ALL-CITIES FENCE COMPANY
2836 ALTA LOMA HIGH SCHOOL
1430 AMERICAN BUSINESS FORMS
2929 AMERICAN CAMPING ASSOCIATION
2693 AMTECM RELIABLE ELEVATOR
Z076 APOLLO INDUSTRIES ZNCo
24 ARBOR NURSERY ZNCo
2616 AUTO PARTS COMPANYw ZNC
4229 BACICHe PATRICK
INSPECTION FEE
(<<
SUBSCRIPTIONS
<<(
PROPERTY PROFILE
<<<
DEPOSIT REFUND
OFFICE SUPPLIES
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES
MONTHLY TELEPHONE BILLINGS
PETTY CASH FOR CITY CLERKS MTG
CELLULAR PHONE BILLINGS
VEHICLE NAINTENANCE
NAZNTENANCE REPAIRS
RENTAL - ALTA LOMA H.So GYM
OFFICE SUPPLIES
TRAINING/PROGRAM BOOKS
MONTHLY SERVICE
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
PROFESSIONAL SERV]CES
803 BALDY VIEW PUBLIC/PRIVATE COALITION CLOUT MEETING
33 BASELINE TRUE VALUE HARDWARE
47 8ELL & HOWELL
2067 BENDER E CO. INC.e MATTHEW
1338 BIG A AUTO PARTS
1247 6LAKE PAPER CO.t INC.
3638 BROCK & SONS INCot N.J.
3942 CAL WESTERN TERMITE PEST CONTROL
937 CALCOMP INC.
62 CALIFORNIA JOURNAL
63 CALIFORNIA PARK & RECREATION
6266 CALIFORNIA PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
6219 CARROT TOP INDUSTRIES
68 CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SERVICE
3622 CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
3622 CHAHBER OF COMMERCE
73 CITRUS MOTORS ONTARZO~ INC.
2670 COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY
6238 COMPLETE FO00 SERVZCEe INCo
130 COMPUTER SERVICE CO
4208 CONCEPT POWDER COATING
6265 CONVERSE ENIRONMENTAL WEST
4249 COPPER STATE COMMUNICATIONS
85 CUCANONGA CO MATER OIST
355 DANIELS TIRE SERVICE
4250 DARTNEL CORPORATION
i~AZZgZ DATAVAULT - U.S. SAFE DEPOSIT CO.
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICE
OFFICE SUPPLIES
VEHICLE ~AINTENANCE
RECREATION SUPPLIES
DEPOSIT REFUND
MONTHLY PEST CONTROL SERVICE
MONTHLY SERVICE
SUBSCRIPTION
MEMBERSHIP DUES
SUBSCRIPTION
OFFICE SUPPLIES
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
MEMBERSHIP RENENAL
NEMBERSHZP RENENAL
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
GREEN WASTE PUBLIC MEETING
SIGNAL MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND
TELEPHONE SYSTEM
MONTHLY'WATER BILLINGS
** CHECKB OVERLAP
86452, 485.00
86653- 86460 >>>
86661 201,24-
86462- 86500
86501 25°00-
86502- 86598 >))
86599, 500,00
86600- 86601
86602 266,23
t 86603 1~682,52
86604 0°33
86605 100.00
t 86606 441.56
lie 86607 164.00
t 86608 le990o00
86609 3t638,25
86610 1,119.47
86611 110.88
86611 102.50
86613 282o16
86614 114032
I 86615 63..65
86616 ZZ5.O0
86617 72.00
86618 58,09
86619 62.50
86620 84°69
I 86621 107.31
I 86622 439.,.56
86623 1.000o00
I 86626 100.00
t 86625 302.00
86626 34..95
86627 77,00
86628 189,00
86629 260..00
86630 33,19
86631 100°00
86632 200..00
I 86633 1.076..T8
86634 35,51
I 86635 333.35
I 86636 5e051..11
86637 213,00
86638 10°50
86639 11t220.00
86642 )))
86663 15,308..68
86644 526°01
86645 201,26
86646 161,18
86660
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE & SUPPLIES
SUBSCRIPTION
DATA STORAGE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
LIST OF WARRANTS
FOR PERIOD: 05-25-96 C93196)
RUN DATE: 05/25196 PAGE; Z
VENOOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARM. ANT.
** CHECKI OVERLAP
4105 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE FINGERPRINTS 86667 992o00
I07 DETCO OFFICE SUPPLIES 86668 37.71
839 DIETERZCH INTERNATIONAL TRUCK VEHICLE MAINTENANCE I 86649 322.86
3165 DIVERSIFIED INSPECTIONS OF CA., INC ANNUAL INSPECTION 86650 350.00
523 EASTMAN, ZNC OFFICE SUPPLZES 0 86651 586°96
3606 ECOFF, JILL EMPLOYEE/COMMUTER OF THE MONTH
3806 ETIWANOA SCHOOL DISTRICT RENTAL OF GYN a ETZWANDA H.S. 86653 2e860.00
26Z6 FANTASY SOUND PRODUCTIONS ENTERTAZNMENT FOR TRAC PARTY 86656 250.00
98 FORD PRINTING t MAILING, INC MAINTENANCE ~ OPERATIONS I 86655 7,509°54
3405 FUN CORNER OFFICE SUPPLIES 0 86656 Z50.O0
3356 GARCXA, VXVXAN C,EoRoT, CLASS SUPPLIES I 86657 50,00
3356 GARCIA, VIVIAN C.E.R.T. CLASS SUPPLIES 86658 6o12
1254 GENERAL BINDING CORPORATION MAZNTENANCE SUPPLIES 86659 104o00
6267 GLENDORA MORTGAGE INC. BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 86&60 18.00
1265 GONSALVES & SON, JOE A. LEGZSLATIVE SERVICES 86661 Z,IO0,O0
691 GRAVES AUTOHOTIVE SUPPLY MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 86&62 28.90
<<< 86663 - 86663 >>>
MONTHLY TELEPHONE BILLINGS I 86666
OFFICE SUPPLIES I 86665
SUB-CONMZTTEE MEETINGS 86666
INSTRUCTOR PHT 86667
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 86668
BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 86669
C E S A MEETINGS 86670
DEPOSIT REFUND 86671
NILEAGE REINBURSEHENT 86672
REFUND OF CASH DEPOSIT 86673
137 GTE CALIFORNIA
6196 HANSON OFFZCE PRODUCTS
2855 HAVEN NINE ~ LIQUOR CO.
820 HEARD PoH. D.t EDWARD
2519 HECKETT SLAG PRODUCTS
12575 HENG BESTPACK INTERNATIONAL, INC.
958 HIGGZNSt MARTI
12576 HIGH POINT CONSTRUCTION
3608 HINSON, KEITH
12276 HIX DEVELOPMENT CORP.
12577 HOLLZNGSHEAO CO., JOHN
161 HOYT LUMBER CO., S.Me
695 HYDRO-SCAPE PROOUCTS, INC
4188 I O BURR
46 INDUSTRIAL ASPHALT
3885 INLAND LANNMOWER
122 INLANO VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN
4162 INTERNATIONAL ZPIAb~S
blZ JAESCMKE ,NC., CeR.
1829 JWP TELECOM INC.
1218 KNOX
321 LANDSCAPE WEST
849 LAWSON PROOUCTS, INC.
4178 LQNCAR, P~L
14~5 LONG'S DRUGS
200 LOS ANGELES TIMES
3156 LU'S LIGHTHOUSE, INC.
386 LYON CO., WILLIAM
1062 M C I TELECONHUNICATZONS
549 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT.INC.
250 HARTINEZ UNION SERVICE
2198 HICHAEL°S CRAFTS
2268 NAPA AUTO PARTS
[\.~3437 NATTnNAL UNIFORM SERVICE
REFUND/TREE REMOVAL FEE 86674
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES t 86675
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I 86676
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 86677
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES ~ 86678
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE ~ ~6679
AUVERTISING I 86680
MONTHLY RENTAL FEE 86681
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE I 86682
TELEPHONE SERVICES 86683
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES ~ 8668~
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ~ 86685
HAI~IT~NANCE SUPPLIES 86586
C.E.R.T. INSTRUCTOR 86687
FILM PROCESSING 86688
SU6SCRIPTION 86689
OIL ANALYSIS t 86690
REFUNOABLE DEPOSITS 86691
TELEPHONE SERVICES 0 86692
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE I 86693
TOWING SERVICES I 86694
RECREATION SUPPLIES 86695
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE I 86696
UNIFORM SERVICES I 86697
4,733.75
1,428.73
6.50
140,00
44.94
7.50
50.00
500.00
16.80
85.50
72.00
11Z.92
219.59
1,076.79
2,535.02
456,00
40.8b
~1~.29
82,526,67
201.0~
112.50
159.99
934.30
692.88
1,000,00
535.71
32,135,60
75.00
9.12
199,82
593.77
CiTY OF RANCHO CU. .ONGA
LEST OF MARRANTS
FOR PERIOD: 05-25-94 (93194)
RUN DATEZ 05125/94 PAGE: 3
VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRiPTiON NARR NO MARR, AHT.
433 NIXON-EGLI EQUIPMENT
12576 NUNN, DAVID
3566 NURSERYLAND
4200 ORCO 6LOCK
8275 P C WORLD
2986 PACIFIC SAFETY
1079 PHOTO HOUSE OF CALIFORNIA
255 POMA DISTRIBUTING CO
2682 POSTAGE BY PHONE
65 PRUOENTZAL OVERALL SUPPLY
1038 R J M DESIGN GROUP, iNCo
4025 R J SUPPLY CO,
626 RAUL Po ROBLES, SRo
4140 ROAD MACHINERT, iNC.
3240 SAN ANTONIO COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
571 SAN BERN CO OFFICE OF MNGHNT SVC
301 SAN BERN CO SHERIFFS
300 SAN 8ERNARDZNO COUNTY
581 SAN 8ERNARDINO COUNTY
132 SAN DIEGO ROTART BROOM CO, ZNC
535 5EMPLEw JUOY
2507 SIEBE ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLS
4069 SIGNAL MAINTENANCE, ZNC,
36 SMIOERLEe SEA
317 SO CALIF EDISON
319 SO CALIF GAS
1632 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
2808 SPORTIME
8606 STEIN, RON (MEMORIES OF ELVIS)
8607 STOEBE, THELMA Go
390 STRESS CENTERS OF AMERICA, ZNCo
1631 SUN ELECTRIC CORPORATION
4111 SNIFTY SIGN
2366 TARGET
836 TARGET SPECIALTY PROOUCTS
8608 TARGET STORES-SMARTS 17597
1151 TECHNIC
8521 THOMPSON PUBLISHING GROUP
1927 TRAMWELL, ROBERT Lo
2958 UMPS ARE US ASSOCIATION
3721 VILLAGE NURSERIES
667 VISA
1103 V~STA PAINT
2052 WAGNER PACIFIC INC°
678 WARREN &CO°e CARL
213 NAXIEe KLEEN-LINE CORP
345 WHITNEY MACHINERY
758 MZTS
509 XEROX CORPORATZON
371 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
DEPOSIT REFUND
LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
SUBSCRIPTION
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
PHOTO SUPPLIES
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE & SUPPLIES
POSTAGE METER MONTHLY SERVICES
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
TIRE REPAIR
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
EMPLOYEE PHYSICALS
TELEPRDCESSZNG SERVICES
CONTRACT SHERIFFS SERVICE
REIN8 PARKING CZTATZONS
CAL-ID PROGRAM
MAZNT SUPPLIES
INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT
SERViCE/SUPPLIES
TRAFFIC SIGNAL PROG EST 11
PETTY CASH - COMMUNITY SVCS
MONTHLY ELECTRIC BILLINGS
MONTHLY GAS 8ILLS
MONTHLY ELECTRIC BILLS
RECREATION SUPPLIES
DEPOSIT REIMBURSEMENT
PERMIT DEPOSIT REIMBURSEMENT
EAP DEPOSIT
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
SIGN DISPLAYS
YOUTH PROGRAM ~ DAY CAMP SUPPL
MAINT SUPPLIES
BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS
OFFICE SUPPLIES
SUBSCRIPTION
COMPUTER CAaLE REPAIR
UMP SERVICES
LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES
VISA HONTHLY BILLINGS
MAINT SUPPLIES
SURVEY SERVICES
LiABiLiTY CLAIMS
MAINT SUPPLIES
MAINT SUPPLIES
RECREACTION SUPPLIES
COPY MACHINE SUPPLIES/SERVICE
RECREATION SUPPLIES
** CHECKI OVERLAP
86698 136.57
86699 1,000.00
I 86700 454°66
I 86701 44Zo28
86102 14.95
86703 249°66
I 86704 93°47
86705 257°79
86706 4,000.00
# 86707 174o12
8 86708 23,573.00
86709 18o45
t 86710 152.00
86711 218o57
I 86712 2,SZOoO0
86713 286,00
86714 98°00
86715 623°00
86716 1o00
86717 191o80
86718 232°00
86719 205.00
86720 8,032°49
t 86721 116o25
I 86722 12,395.90
86723 61°34
86724 - 86729
# 86730 15,429°52
86731 265.89
86732 100o00
86733 1,000°00
86734 ZtO00oO0
I 86735 351o80
86736 64,00
I 86737 246.45
t 86738 2,006.58
86739 15,00
8 86740 245°00
86741 267°00
86742 53.86
I 86743 534°00
86744 122o35
I 86745 575°82
I 86746 951.42
86747 592°00
I 86748 618e60
t 86769 1e423o92
t 86750 205.50
86751 55.26
I 86152 1,532.11
# 80?53 622,09
CZTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
LTST OF MARRANTS
FOR PERZOO: 05-Z5-96 (93194)
RUN DATE: 051Z5/96 PAGE~ 6
VENDOR NAME . ZTEM DESCRZPT:[ON WARR NO WARR. AMTo
** CHECKt OVERLAP
348 ZEP MANUFACTURXNG COMPANY VEHXCLE MAXNT SUPPLXES 86754 60.85
,~ TOTAL 283t361.36
CITY OF RANCHO CUCA' :A
LIST OF MARRANT
FOR PERIOD: 06-01-9~ (93/94)
· RUN DATE: 06/02/94 PAGE: 1
VENDOR NAME · ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NU MARR. AHT. '
758
3326
l
8
2732
3785
1826
1826
4207
4237
6278
1430
310
2616
6269
1338
41
6270
6279
3904
6280
3118
73
74
3073
2470
4119
130
6271
239
355
347
6272
107
274
4205
6273
523
4203
2884
6274
3526
1991
2034
6281
3197
wITS
LUCKY FOOD CENTERS
A & A EQUIPNENT RENTALS CO.e INC.
A.C.E, OFFICE SUPPLIES
ABC LOCK
ACTION ART
AIRTOUCH CELLULAR
AIRTOUCH CELLULAR
ALERT COMMUNICATIONS CO,
ALL.DATA SERVICES
ALTA LONA OPTICAL SERVICE
AMERICAN BUSINESS FORMS
ARROW TRUCK 80DIES & E~UIP INC
AUTO PARTS COMPANYm ZNC
8FCS LINZTEO
BIG A AUTO PARTS
BISHOP COMPANY
80RJAm VICKY
CAL COAST FINANCIAL CORP.
CALIFORNIA BUILDING OFFICIALS
CHAFFEY PLAZA
CHINO HILLS TRANSMISSION
CITRUS NOTORS ONTARIO, INC.
CITY RENTALS
COLORAMA
COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY
COMPETITIVE EDGE CYCLERY
COMPUTER SERVICE CO
CUMMZNGm NANCY
D & K CONCRETE CO
DANIELS TIRE SERVICE
DAY-TIMERS, INC.
DE ANGELOe DOLORES
DETCO
DIETZ TOWING
DYNAMIC GRAPHICSe INC.
EARLYt MARCO
EASTMAN, INC
EFFECTIVE PROMOTIONS
EGGERSm 608
EL CHICANO
ELEVEN WESTERN BUILDERSm INC.
EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTSm INC.
ENPIRE REPROGRAPHICS
ESPOSITOm CHRXSTZNA
FERRELLGAS
FZLARSKY & MATT
FIRE MASTER
FIRST CHOICE VIDEO
. ** CHECKe OVERLAP
REC~EACTZQN SUPPLIES 86751~
((( 86752 - 86754 >)>
TRAVEL & MEETINGS 86755, 26.99
((< 86756 - 86751 >)>
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES I 86758 460.42
OFFICE SUPPLIES t 86759 144.69
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 86760 60.79
RECREATION SUPPLIES I 86761 440,70
CELLULAR PHONE BILLINGS I 86762 421.70
CELLULAR PHONE BILLINGS t 86763 652.33
INSTALLATION/SERVICE 86764 135.00
OFFICE SUPPLIES J 86765 304.10
BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 86766 Z3.00
OFFICE SUPPLIES I 86761 1t182.95
NAINTENANCE SUPLIES e 86768 625.36
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 86769 9.21
REFUND OVERPNT FILM/LICENSE e 86770 119.50
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE # 86171 lm034.66
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES v I 86772 993.64
RECREATION REFUND- 86773 31.50
BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 86776 59°47
BUILDING OFFICIAL REGIONAL MTG 86775 15,00
BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 86~76 35.55
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE a 86777 lm131.86
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES a 86778 163o85
EQUIPMENT RENTAL/SUPPLIES t 86779 845,41
LANOSCAPE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 86780 283.92
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 86781 265.58
EUUXPMENT REPAIR e 86782 308.81
SIGNAL MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES I 86783 18m181,06
RECREATION REFUND 86784 10.00
STREET MAINTENANCE 86785 308,16
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE & SUPPLIES t 86786 1,861.26
OFFICE SUPPLIES 86787 19.45
RECREATION REFUND 86188 35.00
OFFICE SUPPLIES 86789 14.55
VEHICLE TOWING t 86790 115.00
OFFICE EQUIPMENT 86791 54.67
RECREATION REFUND 86791 250.00
OFFICE SUPPLIES I 86793 lm992.32
RECYCLE LITERATURE 86194 116.80
INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 86795 147.84
OFFICE SUPPLIES 86796 175.88
PERMIT REFUNDS t 86797 20m109.03
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 86798 179,34
OFFICE SUPPLIES 86799 449.96
REIHB, PLAYSCHOOL SUPPLIES 86800 5,06
BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 86801 12.46
MONTHL7 SERVICES 86801 161.50
MAINTENANCE SERVICE 86803 115.06
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 86806 16.45
55,26-
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
LIST OF MARRANTS
FOR PERIOD: 06-01-96 C93/94)
RUN DATE: 06102196 PAGE:
VENDOR NAHE ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO NARRo AHT,
390Z FOOTHILLS PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATES
6275 FORTUNATO, NIKE
3386 GOLDEN 8EAR ARBORISTSe INC~
6276 GONZALES. RICHARD
4218 GREAT PERFORMANCE
766 GREAT WESTERN SAVINGS
6131 GSC PASSON'S SPORTS
137 GTE CALIFORNIA
6277 GUNDLACHe ANDREN
6196 HANSON OFFICE PRODUCTS
462 HCS-CUTLER STEEL CO.
12578 HERNANDEZ, NANUEL
2255 HOLf'S AUTO ELECTRIC
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
RECREATION REFUND
PROFESSZONAL SERVICES
RECREATION REFUNO
OFFICE SUPPLIES
DEFERRED COMP
RECREATION EQUIPMENT
MONTHLY TELEPHONE BILLINGS
RECREATION REFUND
OFFZCE SUPPLIES
EQUZPMENT MAINTENANCE
RECREAIION REFUND
NAXNTENANCE SUPPLIES
3633
12579 HOTEL LUXEFORD SUITES
103 Z C H A RETIREMENT TRUST-457
2392
46 INDUSTRIAL ASPHALT
92 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN
6162 INTERNATIONAL IMAGES
179 KAISER FOUNOATION HEALTH PLAN
2220 KELLY PAPER COMPANY "
6265 KZEFER & ASSOCIATESt ADOLPH
169 KINGm L,D,
1218 KNOX
321 LANDSCAPE NEST
869 LAWSON PRODUCTSt ZNC,
1372 LZTTLE RED SCHOOL HOUSE
282 LOGUEt SALLY
549 NARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT, INC.
2198 MICHAEL°S CRAFTS
1228 N R P A NORTHNEST REGIONAL COUNCIL
2268 NAPA AUTO PARTS
3437 NATIONAL UNIFORM SERVICE
6216 NEN HORIZONS
2568 NIGROe ANDREE*
3667 NU ART LIGHTING & HANUFACTURZNG
3659 0 T N
HOMELESS OUTREACH PRGMS& EDUCATION MONTHLY SERVICES
G,F,O,A, ANNUAL MEETING
DEFERRED COHP
YOUTH FLAG FTTALL REGISTRATION
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
SUBSCRIPTIONS
MONTHLY RENTAL FEE
NEOZCAL INSURANCE
PAPER SUPPLIES
RECREATION SUPPLIES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES'
LANDSCAPE NAZNTENANCE
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
fLAYSCHOOL SUPPLIES
REINS. PLAYSCHOOL SUPPLIES
LANDSCAPE NAINTENANCE
RECREATION SUPPLIES
NRPA MEETING REGISTRATION
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
UNIFORM SERVICES
NAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
REIMB, PLAYSCHOOL SUPPLIES
SIGNS
SNAP-OUT HAINTENANCE
8609 PACIFIC DISAaILITY & aUS TECH ASSIS. TITLE Ill REG FOR ADA-DZSABLED
4223 PAPER DIRECT
3464 PERFECTION PRESS
3547 PERPETUAL STORAGE
311 PICDNE PLUMBING CORPORATION
1316 PRECZNT REPORTER
2501 PROFESSIONAL EVENT ORGANIZERS
65 PRUOENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY
8610 PURCELLt SALLY
6182 QUARK
618 R N A GROUP
276 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT
3314 ROBINSON FERTILIZER
RECREATION SUPPLIES
RECREATION SUPPLIES
STORAGE SUPPLIES
PLUMBING REPAIR & SUPPLIES
ADVERTISEMENT
NETROLZNK STATION CERENONIES
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
RECREATION REFUNOS
COMMUNITY SERVICES SUPPLIES
SOIL TESTING SERVICES
PRINTS
LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES
OVERLAP
86805
86806
86807
86808
86809
86810
86811
86812
86813
86816
86815
86816
86817
86818
66819
86 820
86821
86822
86823
86826
86825
86826
86827
86828
868Z9
86830
86831
86832
86833
86836
86835
86836
86837
86838
86839
86 860
86861
86842
86 863
86864
86845
868~6
86 847
86868
86869
86850
86851
86852
86853
86854
86855
230°00
45,00
180,00
35,00
229,63
5mZgO,O0
86,78
982,60
26,00
T6,11
36,97
10,00
80.81
595.00
'621,12
lmZO0,O0
560,00
232,18
116,68
126,07
26t863o58
27o20
439,08
69,65
2m369,63
36,18
198,53'
6,60
12m487,79
206°29
15,00
711.70
580,83
3m155.00
12,51
843o31
650.00
b,O0
67.85
~6~.15
281,46
350,00
95.76
2m361,00
84.21
35.00
3o6.35
72.50
lO.~d
963,12
- CITY OF RANC -CUqk., .,GA
" - LIST OF ~AR~ANTS
'~°-' ,,.FOR PERIOD: g6-01-94 .(g3/94)
. ~' , RUN DATE: 06/02/94 PAGE: 3
'v~:;;:";~""" ....."""~"""""""';;;;-;;;;;;;;--',r-------------------------------- ....- ..........................,
........... ---------- ......., ------------ .....--'-----------.--.-------.-......'.;.~:~ ~ ~L......'.: ~ ~ ;.~ ~Z; ...... ..............
8611
3240
1381
301
303
6253
2507
750
682
4125
3721
667
1103
678
3867
677
1941
8613
758
S09
371
ROMEROe LAURIE
SAN ANTONIO COMMUNITy-HOSPITAL
SAN BERN CO ENVIRON. HEALTH SVCSp
SAN BERN CO SHERIFFS
SAN 8ERNAROINO COUNTY
SMALINAR TOURS & CHARTER
5IEaE ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLS
SPECIALTY TYPENRITER SERVICE
SPEEDNAY HUFFLER INCo
SPENCER & ASSOCIATES
VILLAGE NURSERIES
VISA
VISTA PAINT
NARREN £ CO.t CARL
MATER SAFETY PROOUCTS
NEST PUBLISHING CO
NESTERN TURF & COHMERCIAm'
NILOER~ MICHAEL
WITS
XEROX CORPORATION
ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE
~,
RECREATZN REFUNDS
EMPLOYEE PHYSICALS
PERHIT/UNOERGROUNO STORAGE TKS
-CONTRACT SHERIFFS SERVICE
ENGINEERING OFFICE SUPPLIES
RECREATION TRIP
SERVICE/SUPPLIES
TYPENRZTER SERVICE
VEHICLE MAINT SUPPLIES/SERVICE
REHA8 PROGRAH
LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES
VISA MONTHLY BILLINGS
MAZNT SUPPLIES
LIABILITY CLAIMS
AQUATICS SUPPLIES
PUBLICATIONS
MA[NT SUPPLIES
RECREATION REFUNDS
RECREACTION SUPPLIES
COPY MACHINE SUPPLIES/SERVICE
RECREATION SUPPLIES
OVERLAP
86856
86857 le260.00
86858 1e,131.00
86859 631f133,63
86860 8.89
86861 Z41,20
86862 410,00
86863 70.00
86866 66,94
86865 363.10
86866 281.23
86867 303,98
86 ~ 8 284,62
86869 1e692,80
868?0 256.30
86871 46,85
8687Z 38.42
86873 60.00
86874 239.13
86875 99,13
86876
TOTAL
79?e101,56
·
·
l
·
0610211994
Phi-
CITY IF RAIiCHO CUCMONGA CITY
PORTFOLIO MSTER SUIqflARY CASH
flAY 31~ I994
INVESTRENTS
Certificates of Deposit - Bait ............... I
Local Panicy Investseat Funds ................
hnkurs Acceptances ................. , ........$
Fedural Agency Insets - Coupon ...............
Treasury Securities - OiKount ............... $
Itortgagn Backed Seewritten ................... $
Seill hsiness Administration ............. ...l
AiscellaneousSKuritiSi - Biscuit .......... $
AVERAGE ---YIELD TO flATURITY---
PEIII3T IF AVERAGE DAYS TO ]60' 365 '
BQUIC VALUE PORTFOLIO TERN flATUEITY [QU|VALENT EQUIVALENT
15,419,566.50 ~5.45' * 324 230 * 3.606 3.656
11,213,04)~.00 2~.7e I I 4.271 4.330
4,879,930.DA 11.22 182 177 4.866 4.934
5,496,250.04) 12.64 628 ~ 5.620 5.698
2,913,427.10 6.70 2~B 206 4.HB 4,155
1,971,538.56 4.53 I,BI9 1,182 5.9~B 6.081
1,101,562.50 2.53 9,131 6,263 8.184 8.298
501,904.00 l. I5 10,048 7,~80 8.315 8.430
TOTAL INVESTRENTS and AVERAGES ....... ~ .....$ 43,4'/7,179.22 le. OOZ 664 488 4.465Z 4.:H7Z
Pansbook/Checking Accounts ................... l 673,24e.33
(not includsd in yield calculational
kcrved Interest at Purchase ................. S 31,248.90
1.973 2.000
TOTAL CASH ................................... l 704,497.23
T0TAL CASH and INVESTlENT0 ....... ' ..........l 44s201,676.45
TOTAL EARNINGS
Currant Year
HRNTH 810[QU FISCAL
flAY 31 YEAR TO DATE
165,487.74 I !,395,287.4I
I certify that tkis report accurately reflects all agency punled investnots and
ia in coofortity with investment policy adopted July 7, 1~93. A copy of thin
inventmat policy is available is the Finance Division of the Adsinistrative
Services Departsent. The Investment PrcsJrss horein sham provides sufficient
cash floe liquidSty to ant next eooth'n eatStated nxpenditures.
0610211994
C|TY OF PANCHO CLICNIONNA PN - 2
|NVESTIEMT PORTFOL[O OETA1.LS - [N~EST~ENTS C]TY
NAY 31:1994 CASH
INVESTlENT PURCHASE STATES "r YTH --- NATURZTV DAYS
NIlBEN 1.SguER DATE BOOK VALUE FN:E VALUE ~ARIET VALUE PATE 360 3&5 DATE TO NAT
CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT - BANK
00900 BiNIC OF NERICA
00901. MIlK OF GRERICA
00888 FOOTIIILL INDEP I~1[
00670 GREAT (STERN
00671 alEAT BESTERll
00672 GREAT UESTERN
00674 OSEA1 (STERN
OO881 ill(AT (STERN
00082 GREAT lIESTERN
00683 OSEAT (STERN
00684 OSEAT (STERN
00665 GREAT (STERN
00886 GIFt. AT (STERN
0089l GREAT (STERN
00999 GREAT lIESTERN
00877 SIHIIA
00676 SAlelA
00694 ~IGIA
SliTOTIS and ~WEDAGES
LOCAL AGENCY lIMESTENT FUIdS
O(X)O5 LOCAL AGENCY INVST FtlD
04904 LOCAl A~:;~CY liNST FUND
SUgTOTALS and AVERAGES
BIKERS ACCEPTANCES
00902 DA! ICHI KAINYO DAM( NY
FEDERAL AGENCY ISSUES - COUPOIl
ooe9~ FEDERAL FNllt CItEDIT MS
OOF/6 FEDERAL FASN Cff. IIT INICS
0~97 FEBEILqL FNI fREDIT i~iilKS
SLITOTALS mad AVERAGES
TSEASGRY SECURITIES - SISCOUNT
00675 iNS OF aMERICA
0H92 MI OF MF,.RICH
SUSTOTALS and AVEDASES
05124194 1,79t,645.50 1,79t,64).50 lt791,645.50 2.600 2.600 2.636 01126194
05123194 127m921.00 127t92[.00 127,921.0e 2.600 2.6eO 2.636 06123194 22
03115194 500,000.00' 500,000.00 ~,000.00 4.430 4.430 4.492 03115195 287
111MI93 300,000.00 3Qe,O00.DA 3QQ,QQ4.00 3.SDA 3.50Q 3.549 061OSI94
IIlOg193 1,000,000.'00 [tONstON0.00 1,000,000.00 3.600 3.600 3.650 ll/Oe194
ll115193 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 3.600 3.600 3.650 11/12194 167
11129193 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,DA0.00 3.250 3.2IQ 3.2~ HI29194 89
01120194 1:700,000.00 1,700,000.00 1,700,000.00 3.250 3.250 3.295 10/17194
011221fi 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 3.350 3.350 3.397 0112tl95 238I
02101194 250t000.00 500,000~00 500,000.00 3.250 3.250 3.29f 10/31194
02115194 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.DA 3.750 3.750 3.802 02/1519'j 229
02122/94 500.000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 3.750 3.750 3.B02 02122/9~ 266
03/01194 500,0~.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 3.750 3.720 3.602 0310119~ 273
03/29/94 500~000.00 500,Q00.00 2000,0,00.00 3.750 3.750 3.802 03129195 301
02/12194 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 4.600 4.600 4.6&4 08/14/92 439
01/H/94 1,0~,0~4).00 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 3.150 3.150 3.194 02/08195 252
01/HI94 !,00~,000.00 1,000,000.04) 1,000,000.00 3.150 3.150 3.194 01104/95 217
04/~194 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.DA 4.250 4.250 4.309 05102195 335
15,419,566.50 15,419,566.50 15,419,566.50 ' 3.606 3./~/m 230
!O,lO0,O00.O0 lO,!O0,000.OO 10,100,000.00 4.330 4.271. 4.330
1,113,000.00 1,113,000.04 1,l!3,04~.00 4.333 4.274 4.333
ll,213,000.00 It,213,000.00 11,213,000.00 4.271 4.330
05127194 4,879,930.56 5,000,000.00 4,679,930.56 4.667 4.867 4.934 1112~194 177
04129194 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 5.850 5.770 2.650 04129196 698
05/0~194 1,500,000.00 1,504,000.04 !,509,000.00 5.160 5.OS9 5.160 0510114/5 334
05102194 1',996,2'd0.00 2mOQOmOqO~.00 1,996,250.50 5.850 5.870 5.r~2 04129196 699
5,49&,250.00 2,500,000.00 5,496,250.00 2.620 5.698 5q4t
12/09193 1,000,341.54 lm017,000.00 1,0008341.54 3.240 3.294 3.340 06109194 6
04113/94 1,913,005.56 2,000,000.00 1,913,06~.56 4.370 4.216 4.581 04106/95 309
2,913,427.10 3,017,000.0~ 2',913,427.10 4.098 4.155 20~
m - Rmvmrse Rearchase Agreemrs arm negative menmrs.
0610211%
CITY OF RANClIO CUCANONOA P~ -
INVESTRENT PORTFOLID DETAILS - ]NVESTRENTS CITY
flAY ;SIt 1994 Cell
[AVESTRENT ~ PINCHASE STATEO --- YT~ --- flATINITY DAYS
HINDER ISSUER DATE gO(N( VALIN FRCE VALUE HAqIET VALUE RATE 360 ;065 DATE TO HAT
flOaTGAGE BACKED SECLeITIES
00071 MNK OF NIERICA 0212;SI67 66,606.]8 90,969.54 442,907.10 8.000 6,3;06 6.452 0|/01102 2,77]
0020;S MIIC OF NERICA 09121/67 200101;s.75 21At52;S.68 612~753.60 6.500 9.557 9.689 O9/Ol/lO 5,938
00699 BANK OF NIERICA 05112194 I1465,000.G0 1,500,000.00 1~485t000.00 3.790 5.0;01 5.101 02124195 270
00069 DENI MITTER ~YNOLDS 07101/87 38~406.46 ;07,649.06 841710.56 9.000 6.515 e.a]4 0;S/|510! 2,481
00002 6ISH&TRR DAVIRES 07101167 159t509.97 !61.7~.61 66],;089.28 8.500 8.611 6.751 05/15101 2~542
SUBTOTALS and AV~RN]ES 11971,538.56 2,006:67&.09 1,286,760.76 5.996 6.061 1,162
SHALL BUSINESS AD~INISTRATIOIi
00004 SHALL IJSIRESS AO~il
8ISCELLNdEOIN SECINZTIES - D[SCOUIIT
BANK OF MEBICA
TOTAL INVESTNENTS and AVERAGES
07/25166 1,1011562.50 !,O0010N.00 1,065,!42.;09 9.125 6.104 6.298 07/25/11 6~26]
02/I0167 501,9H.00 5,2DA,000.00 404,672.00 8.430 6,315 8.430 06/15/14 7,;080
$ 4;S,497,[79.22 46~356,442.59 44,660~949.;01 4,465Z 4.547Z 488
Reverse Rearchase Nreeeeets are nqative amounts.
·
·
06/02/19~
CITY OF RAIICHO CUCMORGA PH - 4
IESTRENT PORTFOLIO DETAILS - CASH CITY
MY 3it I994 CASH
CHEC[IHE/ORVINB~ ACCOLIITS
00180 ~ OF NIEIIICA
Accrued Interest at Pvrckase
TOTAL C~SH
TOT& CASH ad IIIVEDTEIITS
[WESTlENT PURCHASE STATED --- YTR --- fiATORITY DAYS
IfU~DER ISSUED DATE BOO1( ViiLit FACE VALUE liRRET VALUE RATE 360 365 DATE TO fiAT
673~248.33 2.000 1.973 2.044
31,24e.9o
$ 7Q4~497.23
$ 44~2Qit&l&,45
06/02/[~, CITY OF RANCHO CUCANURGA Pfi - 5
PORTFOLIO MDTER INVEST~ENT ALTIVITY BY TYPE CITY
MY l, 1994 - HAY 31, 19~4 CASH
STATED TRAN'~CT1UR PURCHASED ,~M. EDI~TURIT]ES
TYPE [NVESTIENI' I ISSIER RATE DATE 011 DEPOSITS OR IIITHORANALS BALANCE
CERT[F[~TES O~ DEPOSIT - BANK BE61NNIIIG BALIICE;
00690 BAK OF dlERICA 2.250 05124194 1,791,645.50
00693 BAld( OF ANERICA 2.250 05123194 127~921.00
00900 ~1~ OF HRICA ' 2.600 0512.q/94 It79t,645.50
00901 MK OF A~ERICA 2.60G 05123194 127.~921,00
00659 FOOTHILL ilIEP ~ 3.227 05109194 3,000,000.00
OHB8 17.EAT KSTERN 4.609 05112194 2.~OOO.,OOO.OO
SUBTOTALS and ElIBIAS BALANCE · 3t919t566.30 4e919,566.50
16,419t566.50
15,419,566.50
LOSAL ASEIICY INVEST(IT FUROS lEGINNING BALANCE:
00005 LOCAL AGENCY [WST FURO ' 4.330 4,9o0,0o0.0o
00804 LOCAL AENCY IJlVST FUND 4.333
SUBTOTALS and ENDING BALANCE
16,113,000.00
O.OQ 4,900,000.00 !l,213,000.00
CHECKZN6/~VINGS ALCIMTS BE6INN[E BALANCE: 27t248.33
O01BO ~ OF MERICA 2.0OO 8,446,044).00 7,802,000,00 673,246.33
BNilCEOS ACCEPTANCES BE6INN!IIG BALANCEs O.OO
00902 O~l ICH[ KANGYO BANK IY 4.867 05/27/94 4,879,930.56 4,679,930.56
FEDERAL ASENCY ISSUES - COUPON
00896 FEDERAL FASfi CREDIT BNIS 5.160 05105194 1,50G,OO~.O0
00897 FE~P. AL FANll CREDIT BANKS 5.850 05105194
SUBTOTALS and ENNII6 IALN(E
BEGINN[liB BALAIICEz 2,0O~,ON.O0
3,496,250.00 0.00 5,496,250.00
TEASLaY SECHRIT[ES - DISCOURT
BE611illIli BALlliCE: 2,913,427.10
2,913,427.10
HURTGAGE BACKED SECURITIES BEGIIINIIIB BALdICE:
00071 ~ OF ~ERICA LOGO 05116194 4,623.30
00203 MNK OF ANERICA 8.500 05125/94 67&.46
00699 BANK OF ~ERICA 3.790 05112194 lg4O5,000,O0
00069 DEAN MITTER DEYNOLOS 9,000 05102/94 330,4&
00002 6IOSN. TAR ~VIASS 9.500 05116194 1,176.13
SUBTOTALS and ENDlAD BALAF,[
493,544.93
1,485~000.00 7,006.37 1,971,5~8.56
: - Reverse Repvrchase Agreements are Mgative arerots.
·
·
·
I
061021|994
CiTY OF BANClIO CUCNNONRA PH ' 6
PORTFOLIO HASTER INVESTRENT ICTIVITY BY TYPE CiTY
HAY ig 1994 - MY 31, 1994 CASH
STATED TRAIlSACTiON PURCHASES SALESIHATURZTIES
TYPE iNVESTRENT ! |S~ER RATE DATE OR OEPO~ITS OR MiTHORAHALS SALNNCE
~ BUSIRESS AOHIH[STRATIOR
H1S(EIINNEOUS Sr:CUR1TIES - DISCOUIIT
TOT&S IE61111116 BALlICE:
t - R.erse Rqarchase Agreeacts are nqstive ieolits.
BEGINNINg BALMICE: 1,101,562.50
1,101,562.50
BEBIMNIM6 B&NNC[t
~01,904.00
$ 39,57Q,~3.36 22t228,747.Q6 i7,628,572.87 44,i70,427,55
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
June 15, 1994
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
Mayor Dennis L. Stout and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
Robert C. Dominguez, Administrative Services Director
Joan A. Kruse, Purchasing Agent
REQUEST TO SURPLUS OCE MICROFILM READER/PRINTER
RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council approve the surplusing of the Oce Microfilm
Reader/Printer and its use as a trade in on the purchase of a new piece of
equipment.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
This machine was purchased in 1985 for use by the Community Development
Departments in the enlargement and reduction of plans. For the past year this
machine has been inoperable as the cost to repair it exceeds its purchase
price as a result of technological changes. The City wishes to purchase a new
microfilm reader/printer machine and use the Oce as a trade in.
The description of this machine is as follows:
Oce Model 3770, microfilm reader printer, S/N 3114901,
Asset Tag No. 00349
Respectfully submitted,
zrvices Director
RCD:j
14
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
June 15, 1994
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
STAFF REPORT
Suzanne Ota, Community Services Manager n~I
Kathy Sorensen, CLP, Recreation Superintende
TEMPORARY VARIANCE OF SPORTS FIELD LIGHTING AT RED HILL
PARK FOR JUNE 25 & 27, 1994
RECOMMENDATION: The Park and Recreation Commission recommends
approval of a temporary variance for sports field lights at Red
Hill Park 60' baseball field. Citrus Little League is requesting
this light variance for June 25 & June 27, 1994, to host the 9 &
10-year old Little League Tournament for District 21.
BACKGROUND: The current sports field light curfew is 10:00 p.m.
Similar tournaments have been hosted over the past several years.
In recent years, the City Council and Park and Recreation
Commission have approved a curfew variance only for overtime play
in hopes that most games would be completed within the stated
curfew.
ANALYSIS: The Park and Recreation Commission reviewed this
request at their May 19, 1994 meeting. The variance would apply
to only the 60' field located on the northeast side of Red Hill
Park. No other game site is used. Citrus Little League has been
asked to host this tournament at its home venue.
In keeping with past policy, the Park and Recreation Commission
and staff recommend that game times be moved forward so extended
light use is available only in overtime situations. Therefore,
the Commission recommends start times of 5:00 p.m. and 7:30 p.m.
on two game nights and 6:00 p.m. on single game nights.
As in the past, the Little League will need to notify neighbors
within one block of the park, provide the City a tournament
bracket one week prior, and supply the necessary comprehensive
liability insurance coverage.
Suz~e Ota, Community Services
Manager
SO/KAS/kls
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
June 15, 1994
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
Suzanne Ota, Community Services Manager
Kathy Sorensen, Recreation Superintendent
AMATEUR RADIO OPERATORS USE OF HERITAGE
EQUESTRIAN CENTER FOR FIELD DAY
PARK
RECOMMENDATIONS
It is recommended by the Park and Recreation Commission to
authorize the second annual overnight facility use permit for
the Amateur Radio Operators field day competition to be held
on June 24 & 25 & 26, 1994.
BACKGROUND
Annually, a day is set aside by. Amateur Radio Operators to
hold a field day competition. The competition is held on a
worldwide basis. Its primary focus is to make as many
contacts in a twenty-four hour period of time as possible.
Depending on the radio frequency or the type of contact
(voice, computer or Morse Code), different points are given.
Several local radio operators (called Ham's) have contacted
the City requesting use of Heritage Park to conduct this
activity.
Last year this event was held with no reported problems by
neighbors nor additional costs incurred by maintenance.
ANALYSIS
The competition requires the group to spend a twenty-four
hour period of time at Heritage Park in the Equestrian area.
The group will have access to restrooms and the building
during this time. The event also requires the construction
of a thirty foot antenna in the equestrian center parking
lot. The use of radio waves should not cause any T.V. or
radio interference with the neighbors.
16
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
AMATEUR RADIO OPERATORS USE OF HERITAGE PARK
June 15, 1994
Page Two
Per discussion with Engineering, Building and Safety and
other City departments, the following conditions of use must
be met:
o A flier outlining the activity and the overnight use must
be delivered to all residents adjacent to the park on the
North, East and West. The flier must first be approved
by Community Services staff.
o Payment for the use of the food area must be paid at the
time of application approval.
o Layout and position of radio antenna reviewed by Grounds
Maintenance including location of coax cabling and power
source.
o Standard public liability insurance must be provided
prior to the event naming the City of Rancho Cucamonga as
additional insured.
o Request of drive by or sheriff notification must be made
by the group upon application approval.
SUMMARY
By providing this activity, the local radio operators enhance
their skills and learn new ones. This directly benefits the
greater Rancho Cucamonga community because radio operators
are used in emergency situations such as natural disasters.
Currently, local radio operators are utilized by the City's
Disaster Preparedness Department.
Respectfully submitted,
~ervices Manager
SO:tp
17
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
June 15, 1994
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
Suzanne Ota, Community Services Manager
Kathy Sorensen, CLP, Recreation Superintendent
APPROVAL OF 2ND ANNUAL CAL NET HORSE SHOW TO BE HELD
AT THE HERITAGE PARK EQUESTRIAN CENTER
RECOMMENDATION
The Park and Recreation Commission recommends approval of the
second annual Cal Net Horse Show to be held at the Equestrian
Center on a date mutually agreed to by Cal Net and Alta Loma
Little League.
BACKGROUND
The Cal Net Horse Show for Disabled Riders was held April 9 and
10 at Heritage Park. This show was extremely successful, well
organized and heavily attended.
All City conditions to usage were met by the group and, as with
any first-time event, a few new things were learned which need
to be addressed next year. Overall, the event was exceptional
and should be encouraged.
ANALYSIS
The support of Little League to vacate the weekend is necessary
to provide this activity, as all parking lots were fully used
for the entire weekend. Alta Loma has agreed to work together
with Cal Net to provide this show again in 1995.
All the same conditions for use would stay in place in 1995
with the addition of two items:
1)
All stable flooring debris be removed within 24 hours
of the stables removal at the Club's cost.
2)
Additional maintenance costs be paid by the group. At
the 1994 event, an additional 9 hours of maintenance
overtime was used. This covers additional dragging of
the arenas, trash assistance, set-up, etc. The cost
for this time would be approximately $260.00.
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
CAL NET HORSE SHOW
June 15, 1994
Page 2
SUMMARY
The event was well organized and heavily artended. It provided
program space for a segment of the population which is under-
served and needs the recreational outlet. Providing the
Heritage Park Equestrian Center in 1995 for this event is a
plus to the entire community and should be encouraged.
Cc~~~ervices Manager
SO/kls
19
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY
SUBJECT:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
June 15, 1994
Mayor and Meters of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
Linda R. Beek, Jr Engineer/~
REJECT ALL BIDS FOR THE BIKE PATHWAYS AND LOCKERS AT VARIOUS
LOCATIONS
RECOII4ENDATION
It is reconmnended that the City Council reject all bids, without prejudice,
for the Bike Pathways and Lockers at Various Locations, as being non-
responsive to the needs of the City.
BACKGROUND/ANN. YSIS
Pursuant to previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened
on May 24, 1994, for the subject project. Staff has reviewed the bids and
found that the bids received exceed the Engineer's Estimate by a substantial
amount as follows.
Engineer's Estimate
Apparent Low Bid
Apparent Second Bid
$57,561.90
$83,545.53
$83,660.50
Therefore, it is recommended that all',bids be rejected. Staff will be
requesting authorization to readvertise at a later date, after reviewing the
budget to determine if this project can be readvertised as is.
Respectfully ubmitted, .
William j./~C/YT~
City Engineer
WjO: LRB :al r
Attachment
INDEX
BIKE PATHWAYS AND LOCKERS
AT
VARIOUS LOCATIONS
LOCKERS
1. CMC CENTER
2. CITY YARD
BIKE ROUTE
3. CHURCH ST &
TERRA VISTA PARKWAY
BIKE LANE/ROUTE
4. ARROW ROUTE
BIKE LANE
5.FOURTH ST
BIKE PATH
6. GREENWAY
CORRIDOR
(TERRA VISTA)
7. ETIWANDA
RANCHO
CUbAMONGA
9 > i
· ~ i
<~ <~ <~
H~SHLAND 'r AVE
BASE LINE ~ RD
__~CHURCH ST
FOOTHILL ELVD "\ I~
..... ..~p~.w. ,. o- ,RiE ....
>
O
'~ f ST
...4.% ........
IO FRWY
ONTARIO'
VICINITY
r--I
o' i I I
/
k ' /
FONTANA
LU
!
|
· ..o I
:
I
NTS
MAP
.j
, 21
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
June 15, 1994
Mayor and Me~i>ers of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
Shelley Maddox, Engineering Aide
ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B
AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. i AND 6 FOR MDR
94-03, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FIFTH STREET, EAST OF
MILLIKEN AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY POMONA FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS AND
LOAN ASSOCIATION
RF, Cl]IIIENDATION
It is recomnended that City Council adopt the attached resolution ordering the
annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting
Maintenance District Nos. I and 6.
B~N~KGROUNO/AXA~YSIS
MDR 94-03, located on the north side of Fifth Street, east of Milliken Avenue
is required to fulfill certain conditions of approval along with the normal
processing. As part of those conditions the Developer is required to install
certain street lighting improvements and to have the project annexed into the
appropriate lighting and landscape maintenance districts·
The Consent and Waiver to Annexation form has been received from the Developer
and is on file in the City Clerk's office. Attached is the resolution
requiring adoption by the City Council to con~lete the proposed annexation.
Respectfu submitted, .
· ' ell m
Wil 1 Jam J 0 N
City Engineer
WjO:SM:dlw
Attachments
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF
CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.
3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 6
FOR MDR 94-03 (APN: 229-341-08)
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to
the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15,
Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said
special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance
District No. 3B, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street
Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 (hereinafter referred to as the
"Maintenance District"); and
WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the
"Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional
territory to the Maintenance District; and
WHEREAS, at this time the City Council is desirous to take
proceedings to annex the property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and
incorporated herein by this referenced to the Maintenance District; and
WHEREAS, all of the owners of property within the territory proposed
to be annexed to the Maintenance District have filed with the City Clerk their
written consent to the proposed annexation without notice and hearing or
filing of an Engineer's "Report".
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct.
SECTION 2: That this legislative body hereby orders the annexation
of the ~roperty as shown in Exhibit "A" and the work program areas as
described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto to the Maintenance District.
SECTION 3: That all future proceedings of the Maintenance District,
including the levy of all assessments, shall be mapplicable to the territory
annexed hereunder.
EXHIBIT "A"
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 B
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6
P.M. N O.
~ P.M.B. J09./4 J--.
3.15 AC.
R~"rH .'"s"F
CITY OF RANCHO CUC&MONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ?~,~,.~
9zl,
STREET LIGHTS:
Dist. 5800L
S1
S6 1
9500L
2'
EXHIBIT 'B'
WORK PROGRAM
PROJECT: MDR 94-03
NUMBER Of LAMPS
16,000L 22,000L
27,500L
LANDSCAPING:
Dlst.
Cornunity
Equest.
Tra t 1
D.G.S.F.
L 3B
Turf Non-Turf
S.F. S.F.
Trees
Ea.
6'
ASSESSMENT UNITS:
DU or
Parcel Acres
3.15
Assessment Units
By District
S1 S6 L3B
6.30 3.15 3.15
* Existing items installed
with original project.
This MDR will add one
street light only.
Form Date 2/18/93
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY
SUBJECT:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
June 15, 1994
Mayor and Members of the City Counpil
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William j. O'Neil, City Engineer
Jerry A. Dyer, Associate Engineer
APPROVAL OF REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF A
PORTION OF A MASTER PLANNED STORM DRAIN FACILITY IN CONNECTION
WITH DEVELOPMENT OF TRACT NO. 14866, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST
CORNER OF LEMON AVENUE AND LONDON AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY THE
PENNHILL COMPANY
RECOIk~ENDATION
It is recomnended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution
approving the Reimbursement Agreement for installation of a portion of a
Master Planned Storm Drain Facility in connection with development of Tract
No. 14866, and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement and
to cause same to record.
BACKGROUI~)/AI(ALYSIS
As a Condition of Approval of Tract No. 14866, the developer, was required to
install a portion of a Master Planned Storm Drain Facility - Alta Loma Creek
Channel along the east tract boundary. The storm drain facilities have been
completed by the developer and accepted by the City.
The developer has submitted an itemized accounting of the construction costs
of said Master Planned Storm Drain Facility. Staff has reviewed and verified
the submittal. The amount due the developer is $364,397.58.
The developer, The Pennhill Company, has assigned Thomas E. and Joyce A.
Tucker as developer and recipient of reimbursements in this matter.
Respectfully~
William j. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:SM:dlw
Attachments
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ENGINEERING DIVISION
ITEM: ~/ / c i ~
~'5
N
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAJwIONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT
FOR THE INSTALLATION OF A PORTION OF A MASTER PLANNED
STORM DRAIN FACILITY IN CONNECTION WITH DEVELOPMENT OF
TRACT NO. 14866
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has for
its consideration a Reimbursement Agreement submitted by The Pennhill Company,
developer, for the installation of a portion of a Master Planned Storm Drain
Facility Alta Loma Creek Channel along the east tract boundary of Tract No.
14866; and
WHEREAS, the developer, at the developer's expense, has con~leted
said storm drain installation; and
WHEREAS, the developer, The Pennhill ConM~any, has assigned Thomas E.
and Joyce A. Tucker as developer and recipient of reimbursements; and
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE that said Reimbursement Agreement be and the same is
hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Reimbursement
Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamenga, and the City Clerk to
attest hereto and cause said Agreement to record.
DATE:
TO:.
FROM:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
June 7, 1994
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager
Deborah Kaye Clark, Library Manager
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL TO EXECUTE AGREEMENT WITH THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO TO
PROVIDE UBRARY SERVICES FOR THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DURING THE
TRANSITION PERIOD JULY 1, 1994 THROUGH AUGUST 31, 1994.
RFCOMMFNDATION:
It is recommended that City Council approve the agreement with the County of San Bernardino to
provide library services at the current Rancho Cucamonga Branch Library from the transition
period of July 1, 1994 through August 31, 1994, to be funded from Account 02-6028 in an
amount not to exceed $70,000.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
As of July 1, 1994, the City of Rancho Cucamonga assumes responsibility for providing library
services to the community. The City anticipates having the new city library completed in
September, 1994.
Effective July 1, 1994, the proposed Agreement provides continued library services to the City
by the County for the months of July and August, 1994, with the ability to extend that service
in monthly increments should the City so desire. Also under this Agreement, the City will be
responsible for the maintenance of the building currently serving as the Rancho Cucamonga
Branch Library.
Service Level: The library services to be provided by the County are at the same level as those
received in June of 1994, including Sunday service. A Summer Reading Program for the
children will also be offered.
FISCAL IMPACT
The recommended Agreement, anticipated to be in effect for two months, reflects an estimated
total cost of $62,404. The $70,000 requested will allow $7,596 for contingency. This
amount falls well within the $80,000 budgeted for the purpose of transitional library services
in the preliminary budget for fiscal year 1994/95.
Respectfully submitted,
Deborah Kaye CI.a,'k:r~,
Library Manager ...,.___.//
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY
SUBJECT:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
June 15, 1994
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack' Lain, AICP, City Manager
STAFF REPORT
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
Willie Valbuena, Assistant Engineer
APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND
MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT FOR TRACT 14121, LOCATED AT THE
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF MILLIKEN AND HIGHLAND AVENUES, SUBMITTED BY
K. HOVNANIAN COMPANIES OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA II, INC., AND
RELEASE OF PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT,
IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND CASH MONUMENTATION DEPOSIT ACCEPTED
BY CITY COUNCIL ON FEBRUARY 20, 1991, FROM RHOADES/SAN JUAN, A
CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
REC{I~IENDATION
It is reconmnended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution
accepting the new Improvement Agreement, Securities and Monumentation Cash
Deposit, releasing the previous Improvement Agreement and Securities and
authorizing the Finance Department to refund the previous Monumentation Cash
Deposit, and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign and release said
agreements.
BACKGROUII)/ANALYSIS
The map, Improvement Agreement, Securities and Monumentation Cash Deposit for
Tract 14121, located at the southwest corner of Milliken and Highland Avenues
were approved by City Council on December 6, 1989. The original Tract Map and
the Amenting Map were recorded on December 15, 1989 and June 19, 1990
respectively.
The property has been purchased by K. Hovnanian Conq~anies of Southern
California II, Inc., who has submitted an agreement and securities to
guarantee the co~letion of the public improvements in the following amounts:
Faithful Performance Bond: $459,800.00
Labor and Material Bond: $229,g00.00
Monumentation Cash Deposit: $ 4,750.00
The above mentioned securities shall replace the securities submitted by the
previous developer, Rhoades/San Juan, A California Limited Partnership, and
accepted by City Council on Februry 20, 1991. It should be noted that, the
Y
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
TRACT 14121
june 15, 1994
Page 2
submitted bond amounts have been reduced by approximately 34% from the
original bond estimate due to the conl~letion of the Milliken Avenue median
improvements. By process of this agreement, K. Hovnanian Companies of
Southern California II, Inc., as the new Developer, has responsibility for the
project.
Copies of the agreement and securities are available in the City Clerk's
Office.
Respectful ly submitted,
William j. O'Neil
City Engineer
WjO:WV:dlw
Attachments
31
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES, AND MONUMENTATION CASH
DEPOSIT FOR TRACT 14121 AND RELEASING THE IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND MONUMENTATION CASH
DEPOSIT PREVIOUSLY ACCEPTED BY CITY COUNCIL ON FEBRUARY
20, 1991
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, did consider an Improvement Agreement, related Securities and
Monumentation Cash Deposit, submitted by K. Hovnanian Companies of Southern
California II, Inc., as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way
adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally
located at the southwest corner of Milliken and Highland Avenues and release
of the previously approved Improvement Agreement, Securities and Monumentation
Cash Deposit for Rhoades/San Juan, A California Limited Partnership; and
WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by
good and sufficient Improvement Securities, which is identified in said
Improvement Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
HEREBY RESOLVES that ( 1 ) said Improvement Agreement Securities, and
Monumentation Cash Deposit submitted by K. Hovnanian Companies of Southern
Call fornia I I, Inc., are hereby approved, (2) the previously approved
Improvement Agreement, Securities and Monumentation Cash Deposit from
Rhoades/San Juan, A California Limited Partnership are released and (3) the
Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto.
IRIP!
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA'
ENGINEERING DIVISION
m~ : T/(' 14121
N
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
June 15, 1994
Mayor, and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspector ]~
APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION FOR TRACT
13281, LOCATED ON THE NORTH WEST CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD
AND ROCHESTER AVENUE, SUBMIllED BY BROCK HOMES
RECOIIIEMDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution,
accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing
the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement.
BACKGROUMD/ANALYSIS
Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the
construction of the public improvements for Tract 13281 were approved by
the City Council on May 17, 1990, in the following amounts:
Faithful Performance Bond: $843,200.00
Labor and Material Bond2 $421,600.00
The developer, Brock Homes, is requesting approval of a 12-month
extension on said improvement agreement due to current economic
conditions. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available
in the City Clerk's Office.
Respectful ly submitted, .
William J. O'Nell
City Engineer
WJO:SMG: ly
Attachments
May 17, 1994
Mr. Steve M. Gilliland
City of Rancho Cucamonga
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 91729
M J BroCk & Sons. Inc
o :~vlar'O ccmGany
23382 Mill Creek Dnve
Suite '~30
~aguna Hills. CA ,~2053
7~4-~83-~06~ Office
7'4 837-4536 Fax
Subject: Request for Extension of Improvement Agreement
Tract 13281
Dear Mr. Gilliland,
Thank you very much for bringing the issue of the
expiration of uur Improvemen~ Agreement for Tract 13281
to our attention.
I apologize for our late request for extension. Due to
the closure of our office on Shelby Street in Ontario,
your letter was delayed in it's receipt by this office.
Regardless, we hereby request that the Agreement for this
tract be extended.
We have intentions of completing this tract and this can
be verified with the Building Department as evidenced by
the building permits which have recently been pulled.
Our schedule at this time for closing all homes within
Tract 13281 is December 1995, although we will be
proceeding to complete the major utility and road
improvements for the tract over, the next three months.
This will allow us to proceed into this area of the tract
to build homes.
Enclosed you will find (3) City Agreement Extension forms
completed per your request along with the fee of $251.00.
I also included a copy of your letter for reference.
Should you have any questions, or require any further
information, please do not hesitate to give me a call.
Thank You,
cc. John Vander Velde
Mike Altenhofel
Enclosure
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCNO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13281
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension
executed on June 15, 1994, by Brock Homes as developer, for the improvement of
public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described
therein, and generally located at the north west corner of Base Line Road and
Rochester Avenue; and
WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said
Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in
conjunction with the development of said Tract 13281; and
WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and
accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified
in said Improvement Agreement Extension.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said
Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is
hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto.
f
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
June 15, 1994
Mayor, and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William j. O'Neil, City Engineer
Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspector~
APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION FOR TRACT 13114
LOCATED ON SOUTHEAST CORNER OF VINEYARD AVENUE AND CALLE
DEL PRADO, SUBMITTED BY BAYOUN DEVELOPMENT
RECClIIDIDATION
It is reconmnended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution,
accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing
the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement.
I)J~CK6ROUMD/AMALYSIS
Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the
construction of the public improvements for Tract 13114 were approved by
the City Council on May 15, 1992 in the following amounts:
Faithful Performance Bond: $347,000.00
Labor and Material Bond.. $173,500.00
The developer, Bayoun Development is requesting approval of a 12-month
extension on said improvement agreement due to slow economic conditions
and difficulty obtaining construction finance. Copies of the Improvement
Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's Office.
Respectful ly ubmitted,-
William J. ~
City Engineer
WJO: SMG :al r
Attachments
Y
Bayoun Corporation
Real Estate Developers
CllY 0[: RA,'Ic'~ "'' '
E'NG!b'.EFR' :" 'i
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
10500 CIVIC CENTER DR.
P.O. BOX 80?
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91729
ATTN: STEVE GILLILAND
PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR II
RE: TRACT 13114 EXTENSION OF THE IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT.
5/18/94
DEAR SIR,
DUE TO THE ECONOMIC SITUATION AND BAYOUN CORP'S INABILITY TO
OBTAIN ANY CONSTRUCTION FINANCING, BAYOU CORP. HAS BEEN FORCED NOT
TO PROCEED WITH ANY DEVELOPMENT WORK ON THE ABOVE MENTIONED TRACT.
BAYOUN CORP IS HOPING THAT WITHIN THE NEXT 12 MONTHS THE SITUATION
WITH THE ECONOMY AND WITH CONSTRUCTION LENDERS WILL IMPROVE,
ALLOWING THE DEVELOPMENT OF NEW HOMES TO PROCEED.
BAYOUN CORP WOULD LIKE TO REQUEST A 12 MONTH EXTENSION ON THE
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT IN ORDER TO OBTAIN THE FINANCING NEEDED TO
DEVELOPE TRACT 13114.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR COOPERATION AND IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE
FEEL FREE TO CALL OUR OFFICE.
THANK YOU
YEHIA HASSEN BAAYOUN
PRESIDENT
1534~ Hatuthome 81vd., Sl:e, 405, Lawndale, CA 90~60 (~13) 679-83~2
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13114
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension
executed on June 15, 1994, by Bayoun Development as developer, for the
improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically
described therein, and generally located on the southeast corner of Vineyard
Avenue and Calle Del Prado; and
WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said
Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in
conjunction with the development of said Tract 13114; and
WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and
accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified
in said Improvement Agreement Extension.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said
Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is
hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto.
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
June 15, 1994
Mayor, and Men~aers of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspector II~
APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION FOR TRACT
14644, LOCATED AT THE EAST END OF CAMELLIA COURT EAST OF
BERYL STREET, SUBMITTED BY JORGE CARCIA
RF, C(31I~CNDATION
It is recomnended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution,
accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing
the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the
construction of the public improvements for Tract 14644 were approved by
the City Council on June 4, 1992, in the following amounts:
Faithful Performance Bond: $85,000.00
Labor and Material Bond:, $42,500.00
The developer, Jorge Garcia, is requesting approval of a 12-month
extension on said improvement agreement due to slow economic
conditions. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available
in the City Clerk's Office.
Respectfull ubmitt~~_~
William j. ~ ' '
City Engineer
WJO:SMG:sd
Attachments
Y
Garcia &
Associates
Architecture · Planning · Urban Design · Interiors
Member American Institute of Architects
May 12, 1994
Su,:e
Cucamorga CA
90,9-9877E':
FAX 909-980 5:: :,
Mr. Steve Gilliland
Public Works Inspector
City of Rancho Cucamonga
P.O. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Dear Mr. Gilliland,
Subject: TRACK//14644
I would like to request an extension of the approved Track #14644. Start of
construction has been delayed due to the state of the economy.
Enclosed please find (3) notorized copies of the Improvement Agreement
Extension form and a check in the amount of $251.00 for the extension
fees.
Should you have any questions please contact me at your earliest
convenience.
:~incere(Q~lA~
Jorge R. Gar~ia
cc: file
Enclosures
·
RESOLUTION NO. /
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 14644
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension
executed on June 15, 1994, by Jorge Garcia as developer, for the improvement
of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described
therein, and generally located at the east end of Camellia Court east of Beryl
Street: and
WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said
Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in
conjunction with the development of said Tract 14644; and
WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and
accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified
in said Improvement Agreement Extension.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said
Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is
hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto.
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
June 15, 1994
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William j. O'Neil, City Engineer
ACCEPTANCE OF 0 OF
COMPLETION FOR TRACT 10210, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF
ALMOND STREET WEST OF SAPPHIRE STREET
RECOlilwlEliDATION:
The required street improvements for Tract 10210 have been conM~leted in
an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that City Council accept said
improvements, accept the Maintenance Guarantee Bonds in the amount of
$128,400 and $53,500, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of
Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful
Performance Bonds in the amount of $1,284,000 and $535,000.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
Tract 10210 - located on the north side of Almond Streeet west of
Sapphire Street
DEVELOPER:
First Hotel Investment Corporation
28202 Cavot Road, Suite 300
Laguna Nigelj, CA 92677
Accept:
Maintenance Guarantee Bond
Release:
Faithful Performance Bond
Respectful ly ubmitted, -
William J. 0
City Engineer
Streets
$ 128,400
$1,284,000
Undergrounding
$ 53,S00
$535,000
WjO:SMG:sd
Attachment
Y
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS
FOR TRACT 10210 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tract 10210
have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and
WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying
the work complete.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamenga
hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is
authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of
San Bernardino County.
ORDINANCE NO. 524
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OOUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCID
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC
PLAN ~ 93-03, A ~ TO AM~qD THE ~
AREA SPECIFIC PLAN TO ~"TABLISH A SUBAREA 18, AND OTHER
Rk~ATED AMENEM~gTS, IN COMgf~CT/ON WITH THE SUSARFA 18
SPECIFIC PLAN, FOR 380 ACRES OF LAND BOL~D~D ON THE SOUI~
BY 4TH STREET, ON THE FAST BY MITI.TK~ AV~qUE, ON THE
NORTH BY THE A. T. & S. F. (METROT.INK) RAII;~3AD, AND ON
THE WEST BY C~ AND UTI CA AV]~FUES, RAN(2~O
%~IER~OF - APN: 209-272-01, 04, 07, AND 08; 210-081-22
AND 23; 210-082-02, 11, 17, 37, 38, AND 39; AND 210-361-
01 THROUGH 26.
A. R~citals.
1. General Dynamics has filed an application for ~ial Area
Specific Plan Amendment No. 93-03 as described in the title of this
Specific Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application."
2. On Febrotary 23, and March 23, 1994, the Planning C~t~ission of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted workshops on the application.
3. On April 27, 1994, the Planning C~tu,d~sion of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and,
following the conclusion of said public hearing, adopted its Resolution No.
94-31 , thereby reccmrendi~g to City Council that this application be
4. On Jurm 1, 1994, the City Council of the City of Rancho O,camonga
conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said
hearing on that date.
5. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance
have occurred.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does
hereby find, determine, and ordain as follows:
1. This Council hereby specifically firKie that all of the facts set
forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct.
2. Based upon sukstantial evidence presented to this Council during
the above-referenced public hearing, including written and oral staff rep3rts,
together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as
follows:
Ordinance No. 524
Page 2
a. The application applies to approximately 380 acres of land,
located west of Milliken Avenue, between 4th Street and the A. T. & S. F. rail
line and is presently vacant, except for 75 acres developed with three
industrial office buildings. Said property is currently under contiguous
ownership and is designated as General Industrial (Subareas 10 and 11) and
Iadustrial Park (Subares 12);
b. The property to the north of the subject site is designated
Minimum Impac~ Heavy Industrial (Subarea 9) and is developed. The property to
the west is designated General Industrial (Subareas 10 and 11) and Industrial
Park (Subarea 6) and is primarily developed. The property to the east is
designated General Industrial (Subareas 10 and 11) and Industrial Park
(Subarea 12) and is primarily developed. The property to the south is
designated the Ontario Center Specific Plan and is vacant;
c. The application is part of a series of applications relating
to a Subarea 18 Specific Plan, which contemplates a broad range of uses, such
as recreational, hotel/conference center, retail, restaurant, and
entertainment, as well as office, research and development, and light
irr]ustrial uses surrounding an 18-hole public golf course;
d. This amendment does not conflict with the ;~nd Use Policies
of the Industrial Area Specific Plan and will provide for development within
the district in a manner consistent with the ~ial Area Specific Plan and
with related development;
e. This amendment does prcmxYce the goals and objectives of the
General Plan; and
f. This amendment would not be materially injurious or
detrimental to the adjacent properties and an ~hvironmental Impact Report has
been prepared and, concurrently with this application by separate Resolution,
is recunu~_nded to the City Council for certification.
3. Based upon the substantial evide3x~ preented to this Council
during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific firfLings of
facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and
concludes as folly:
a. That tba subject property is suitable for the uses permitted
in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and cc~patibility with
b. That the proposed amendment is in conformante with the
General Plan.
c. That the amendments to the ~ial Area Specific Plan are
consistent with the objectives of the City's Development Code, Ordinance No.
211, adopted December 7, 1983.
Ordinance No. 524
Page 3
d. That tba Subarea 18 Specific Plan suhnitted in conjunction
with the propDeed amendment provides for:
(1) The development of a ccmprebansively planned urban
community within the District that is superior to develclment otherwise
allowable under alternate regulations;
(2) Development within the District in a manner consistent
with the General Plan and related development and growth management policies
of the City.
(3) The construction, improvement, or extension of
transportation facilities, public facilities, and public services required by
develclmmnt within the District.
e. The proposed amendment will not adversely affect the public
health, safety, or welfare;
f. The actions taken and proposed to be taken by the City with
respect to the proposed amendment and the corresponding change of zone have
been and will be ccmloleted and reviewed in accordance with, and cueply with,
all applicable State and local laws and regulations.
4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in
paragra~ 1, 2, and 3 above, this Council hereby approves Industrial Area
Specific Plan Amendment 93-03 to establish a Subarea 18 for 380 acres of land
at the northwest corner of Milliken Avenue and 4th Street (see Exhibit "A") ,
and amending the text of the Industrial Area Specific Plan per the attached
Exhibit "B."
5. Pursuant to provisions of California Public Resources Code
Section 21089(b), this application shall not be operative, vested or final,
nor will building permite be issued or a map recorded, until (1) the Notice of
Determination (NOD) rBgarding the associated environmental action is filed and
posted with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of the County of San
Bernardino; and (2) any and all required filing fees assessed pursuant to
California Fish and Game Code Section 711.4, together with any required
handling charges, are paid to the County Clerk of the County of San
Bernardino.
In the event this application is determined exempt frum such
filing fees ~ to the provisions of the California Fish and Game Code,
handling charge for filing a Certificate of Fee Exemption, tb~-~ condition
shall be deemed null and void.
Ordinance No. 524
Page 4
6. The Mayor and the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of
this Ordinance and shall cause the same to published within 15 days after its
passage at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of
general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and
circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
FOOTHILL BLVD.*
~,~mov, ~,.:::::::::
'
' .
A.T. & S.~. ~R.
'...
Z . .~,~
~ ~ ..........~:~::~:::::
1-10
I
I
I
:i:i:i:i:i:i:i:?:':'::i:i:ii"'
I
I
e
I
I
l
I
I
e
e
e
LEGEND
I ..... ~ PmlectSitel~und~ I:.:.~.:l InduscriaiPuk
Michael Bandm~n As.mcLacn · 1/94
i I
H~v,/, IndustPI
R~ncho C,,c.~nonp-Sub-Az~ Spm~c Plu~
0' 1000' 2000'
Sub-~'ra BounCe
Industrial Area Specific
Plan Land Use Amendment
Rancho Cucamonga IASP Sul3-Atea 18 Spec,hc 49
II. URBAN DESIGN CONCEPT
This section deals with the physical appearance of the Industrial Area. While
more specific urban design guidelines for the Area are incorporated in Part
III, this section describes the overall, Area-wide design concept addressing
physical form and appearance, open space network, special features and
gateways. Figure II-8 summarizes the Area-wide urban design policies.
Physical Form and Appearance
The Industrial Area has been divided into 16 subareas, each of which is
designated with one of the four Land Use Categories. The development
standards specified for each of these subareas will distinguish them from each
other by the types of uses permitted or conditionally permitted, parcel sizes,
setback requirements, landscaping, performance requirements, vehicular and
rail access, and parking provisions. The distinction of each subarea would
serve as a mechanism to create and enhance the identity of each subarea.
The Industrial Area forms a part of the community fabric by integration into
an arterial roadway network which serves the entire City. The area's identity
is further enhanced by the development of specially designed landscape themes
at arterial roadway entry points into the plan area.
Each land use category is further distinguished by general architectural
themes based upon the planned land use intensity. While the themes may vary,
hiqh quality of desiqn is expected in all land use cateqories of the
Industrial Specific Plan. There are ~ six land use categories in the
Industrial Specific Plan:
INDUSTRIAL PARK CATEGORY has been designated for five ~5) subareas.
Primary uses in this category include custom light manufacturing, light
wholesale storage and distribution, administrative and office, and
professional services. This area is reserved for firms seeking
attractive and pleasant working environment and a location which has
prestige value. High quality architecture is required and site planning
must emphasize a pedestrian oriented, campus-like setting with the
greatest amount of landscaping. The development of prefab, all metal for
sheathing of building is considered inappropriate for this category. The
Industrial Park category is typically located adjacent to special
boulevards {major thoroughfares) to enhance major gateways into the
community and create a high quality image. In addition, the Industrial
Park category is used as a transition from industrial to residential
uses.
GENERAL INDUSTRIAL CATEGORY has been established for seven /7~
subareas. This category is intended to accommodate a wide range of light
to medium manufacturing and wholesale, storage, distribution uses.
Typically, administrative and office and professional services are not
allowed to reduce potential land use conflicts. Design and technical
standards are less demanding than the Industrial Park category, but
safeguards are provided to ensure a pleasant, well functioning
environment. The development of prefab, all metal for sheathing of
buildings is considered inappropriate for this category.
MINIMUM IMPACT/HEAVY INDUSTRIAL is designated for Subarea 9. This
category provides for heavy manufacturing and wholesale, storage,
distribution uses which do not have a significant aesthetic impact on the
surrounding area. Not permitted in this area are massive outside
structures such as cranes, or unscreened storage of raw or finished
products. Landscaping requirements in Subarea 9 along Arrow Highway have
been increased to create a smoother transition to adjoining industrial
park and general industrial property.
HEAVY INDUSTRIAL CATEGORY has been designated in Subarea 15. Permitted
uses include Medium, Minimum Impact, and Heavy Industrial Manufacturing
and each of the wholesale, storage, distribution uses. Design and
technical standards in this category allow massive outdoor structures and
open air storage in an unscreened manner. A high degree of rail usage
may also be typical.
MIXED USE CATEGORY has been designated in a portion of Subarea 18. This
category is intended to encourage the mix of different, but compatible,
land uses and activities within a single integrated development. Mixed
use developments are ideally suited adjacent to high activity nodes along
major transportation corridors, particularly adjacent to public transit
facilities to establish a built-in ridership. Mixed use projects can
incorporate a wide range of commercial and industrial activities,
including medium, light, and custom manufacturing; research and
development; office; recreation; and commeercial.
OPEN SPACE has been designated for a portion of Subarea 18. Permitted
uses include golf courses, outdoor recreation areas, and parks.
The Plan also emphasizes the following areas:
THE HAVEN AVENUE OVERLAY DISTRICT is located on both sides of Haven from
Foothill Boulevard south to 4th Street. As the City develops, Haven
Avenue will become a major north-south travel route and has a potential
for high end office development with the unique combination of direct
access to the Ontario Airport and Interstate 10 freeway. The standards
in the Overlay District are designed to enhance Rancho Cucamonga's image
by providing an intensive, high quality and prestigious gateway into the
community. A progressive, sophisticated, and urban style of development
is required and special site planning and landscaping requirements are
included to enhance the pedestrian environment and create a campus-like
atmosphere.
51
INTERSTATE 15 !Devore Freeway) runs north-south through the industrial
area and borders seven (7) subareas in each land use category except
General Industrial/Rail Served. Since this area is directly south of the
future regional mall and related commercial activities at I-!5 and
Foothill Boulevard, and views along the freeway have a major impact on
the image and identity of Rancho Cucamonga. Highest consideration should
be given to design aspects that affect a positive image of the community
as viewed from the freeway. Special consideration are contained in the
Development Standards of each subarea which abutts the 1-15 freeway. (An
1-15 Overlay District could provide special development criteria to
eliminate unsightly views.)
Open Space Network
Elements that constitute open space include
parks, outdoor recreation areas, creeks and
channels, transmission corridors, and stormwater
retention areas. In addition, to the extent that
they provide amenities, development setback
areas, and street landscaping with associated
pedestrian and bicycle paths, also compliment
open space. As indicated in Figure II-8,
easements for creeks and channels and powerline
corridors traverse the Industrial Area, linking
them with the City's region's, and National
Forest open space areas. Directly south of 4th
Street between Cucamonga Creek and Turner Avenue
is Guasti Regional Park, comprised of
approximately 200 acres, to which both Cucamonga
and Deer Creek Channels connect. While all of
these linear open space components run
north/south, the Plan proposes east/west
connections of open space, incorporating the
~ AXIZ ~ Jill ~i~R~ setback requirements
along major arterials, as well as related buffer
landscaping provisions along certain land use
edges, as elaborated in Part III.
The private open space areas, developed
internally within the planned industrial
projects, should connect with the Area-wide open
space network wherever possible, to avoid
fragmentation of open space to unify the Area-
wide appearance.
The Rancho Cucamonga Adult Sports Park features
42 acres of active open space in the approximate
location of Arrow and Rochester. A proposed !O
acre neighborhood park is located within the
Industrial Area southwest of Arrow and Haven. A
five acre mini-park is proposed along 6th Street
between Hellman and Archibald. A 150 acre public
golf course is proposed west of Milliken Avenue,
between 4th Street and the A.T. & S.F. tracks.
The course represents the largest contiguous open
space element in the entire industrial area.
Special Features
Special features refer to areas of visual,
historic, and activity focal points within and
near the Industrial Area. These are also shown
in Figure XI~B II-lO. These features should be
respected and development and redevelopment
around them should compliment and enhance their
scale and character. The coordinated
improvements of the special features and the
corridors along which they are located, should
further help unify the overall appearance of the
Industrial Area and City.
The old Cucamonga historic commercial center at
the intersection of Foothill and Archibald and
the location of Thomas Winery at the intersection
of Foothill and Vineyard, are also of historic
interest.
A 42 acre Rancho Cucamnga Adult Sports Park
featuring year-round sports activities, including
the Rancho Cucamonga Stadium, is located on the
west side of Rechester Avenue, south of Foothill
Boulevard. A 150-acre public golf course is
proposed to stretch from 4th Street to the A.T. &
S.F. tracks, west of Mtlltken. The course will
provide significant vistas from 6th Street.
Also along Foothill Boulevard near its
interchange at 1-15 is proposed a major regional
shopping center {over one million square feet of
floor space containing six department stores on
approximately 100 acres of land). This would be
a significant commercial activity center of
regional impact.
Gateways
Certain points of access to the City will, by
use, become major entrances to the Industrial
Area. A significant portion of the visitors' and
users' impressions of the Industrial Area are
influenced by conditions at these locations.
Hence, it is imperative that special
considerations be given to the development and
design of these gateways areas.
As shown in Figure II-1, gateway areas are
identified along the major roadways that form the
Industrial Area {and City} boundaries--4th
Street, Foothill Boulevard, Etiwanda Avenue, and
Arrow Route. The gateway of primary importance
is located at the intersection of Haven and
4th. Other major gateways to the Industrial Area
III. LAND USE PLAN
Use of the industrial lands is organized to provide
a broad range of industrial development
opportunities ranging from light/industrial type of
accommodations to sites for heavy, rail-served
industrial plants. Based on consideration of road
and rail access, the relationship to surrounding
non-industrial uses, City-wide plan policies and the
parcelization pattern, land within the Industrial
Area is assigned to major land use categories:
- Industrial Park
- General Industrial
- Minimum Impact/Heavy Industrial
- Heavy Industrial/Rail-Served
- Mixed Use
- Open Space
The definitions of the f~f six industrial land use
categories follows in Table II-1, and the
distribution of these uses are shown in Figure II-1
Land Use Plan. A more detailed definition of
permitted and conditionally permitted uses is listed
in Part III.
TABLE I[-I
INDUSTRIAL LAND USE CATEGORIES
INDUSTRIAL PARK GROUP. Land is reserved for industrial firms seeking an
attractive and pleasant working environment and a location which has prestige
value. Approximately I~ 1,095 acres have been allocated to this use~ ~ ~%
~f ~ ~1. Industrial Park group designation permits light industrial uses,
office and administration facilities, research and development laboratories,
limited types of warehousing, as well as support businesses and commercial
service uses. The Industrial Park areas are characterized by a high
employment density. The development and design standards are developed to
protect lands in this use group from development which is inappropriate due to
either function, appearance or environmental affects.
GENERAL INDUSTRIAL GROUP. This group provides for the widest possible range
of light and medium industrial type activity, including manufacturing,
assembling, fabrication, wholesaling, heavy commercial, and office uses;
totaling approximately I~7~ 2,161 acres~
This land use category is appropriate as a buffer between non-industrial uses
and heavy industrial uses. In these areas, the applicable development and
design standards are less demanding than those of the industrial park areas,
but safeguards are provided to ensure a pleasant well-functioning
environment. The required land area per parcel is also less demanding than
other industrial areas so as to accommodate smaller firms.
MINIMUM IMPACT HEAVY INDUSTRIAL GROUP. Approximately 537 acres ~ I~% ~f I~
is reserved for minimum impact heavy industrial uses. The development
standards are designed to provide for heavy industrial uses which will not
significantly impact on the surrounding area. Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial
activities include manufacturing, compounding, processing, fabrication,
warehousing, storage and freight handling. Uses typical of this group include
but are not limited to forge shops, steel milling facilities, plastic plants,
steel fabrication, metal fabricating facilities, woodworking facilities, heavy
machine shops and chemical storage and distribution. Not permitted within the
area are uses which require massive structures outside of buildings or
unscreened open air storage of larger quantities of raw, semi-refined, or
finished products.
57
TABLE II-! 'Continued~
INDUSTRIAL LAND USE CATEGORIES
HEAVY INDUSTRIAL GROUP. Approximately 675 acres ~f I~% of land east of Devore
Freeway is reserved for Heavy Industrial Uses. The development standards are
designed to provide for all heavy industrial uses. Heavy Industrial
activities include manufacturing, compounding, processing, fabrication,
warehousing, storage, and freight handling. Use characteristics of this group
would include large structures to facilitate processing and open air storage
of large amount of raw or semi-refined products. Uses within this area
typically include but are not limited to; vehicular assembly plants, power
plants, concrete product manufactures and batch plants.
MIXED USE. Approximately 227 acres of land west of Millikan Avenue, between
4th and the A.T. & S.F. tracks, is reserved for mixed-use development. This
land use category is characterized by various combinations of commercial,
office, recreation, and industrial activities within an integrated development
project.
OPEN SPACE. Approximately 150 acres of land west of Milliken Avenue, between
4th and the A.T. & S.F. tracks, is reserved for open space. This land use
category is characterized by natural or man-made open space which creates an
attractive and pleasant environment for surrounding businesses. Uses within
this area typically include golf courses, outdoor recreation areas and parks.
--- AQUEDUCI
CREEK
~ ACCESSPOINTS
CITY OF
Revised: 2117/88
3/15169
911WltO
Roadway
Cross-Sections
Roadway Network
Modifications
Cross-sections for roadway requirements were
determined based on mid-block roadway capacities.
Major arterials with !20 foot right-of-way in the
Industrial Area include:
o North/south roadways of Haven Avenue, Day
Creek Boulevard, and Milliken Avenue.
o East/west roadways of Foothill Boulevard, 6th
Street between Haven Avenue and Interstate 15
and 4th Street.
Major arterials with 100 foot right-of-way include:
o North/south roadways of Archibald Avenue,
Rochester Avenue, Buffalo Avenue and Etiwanda
Avenue.
o East/west roadway of Arrow Route.
Secondary arterials with 88 foot
include:
right-of-way
o Vineyard Avenue, Hellman Avenue,
~dWd~ and 6th Street west of Haven Avenue.
These streets will form the basic 1/2 mile grid
system. The other streets, which will further
divide the circulation network into 1/4 and 1/8 mile
grids, will have rights-of-way ranging from 66 feet
to 88 feet. Figure II-4 presents mid-block cross-
sections of each street classification type with
lane requirements.
The following roadway modifications are recommended
within the Industrial area.
o New Rochester. As discussed in the City-wide
and Industrial Area Traffic Study and
incorporated in the Industrial Area Plan,
Rochester Avenue from 4th Street to 8th Street
should be terminated north of 4th Street and
connected to Buffalo Avenue. This will
provide adequate distance for turning lanes
between the Rochester and 1-15 ramp
intersections along 4th and {in the future}
6th Streets.
G1
FIGURE 11-5
STREET CLASSIFICATION
MAJOR ARTERIAL DIVIDED (120 ft. ROW)
o Foothill
o Haven
o Milliken
o 4th/
o 6th
between Haven &
I -15
120 ft. ROW
O
Day Creek B1 vd.
MAJOR ARTERIAL (100 ft. ROW)
o Archi hal d
o Arrow
o Buffalo
o Etiwanda*
Rochester
south of Foothill
11 ft.
100 ft. ROW
*Median jsland between Arrow and Foothill.
SECONDARY (88 ft. ROW)
Vineyard
He 11 man
6th West of Haven
Turner
Jersey
8th West of Vineyard
64 ft.
ROW
ALL LOCAL INDUSTRIAL (66 ft. ROW)
0
0
0
0
0
0
8th (east of Vineyard)
9th
Center
Santa Anita
Old Rochester
Baker
Other Local Streets
ll' {
44 ft.
el ft. ROW
/,-11'
Figure il-6
DIRECTIONAL LANE AND ROoW. REQUIREMENTS AT INTERSECTIONS
FOOTHILL
BLVD.
ARROW
ROUTE
131 "'~--1 i'~~~)~ 131 "'~--1
~J,,L) .(--.2 2
,,L-'2 - ,,;-~ .~
~ .....a 2.'''~ ~,,L'-> ~
. _ ~_,.~...,:,.:~
6TH
STREET
131
131
~--> <~1'~
131
4TH
STREET
TABLE
LOCATIONS OF MEDIAN LEFT TURN OPENINGS ON MAJOR DIVIDED HIGHWAYS
MAJOR STREET
Haven Avenue
Milliken Avenue
Foothill Boulevard
6th Street
4th Street
MEDIAN OPENING LOCATIONS
Foothill Boulevard, Civic Center Drive, Arrow Route,
Jersey Boulevard, 7th Street, 6th Street, Trademark
Street, 4th Street.
Foothill Boulevard, Day Creek Boulevard Extension, Arrow
Route, Jersey Boulevard, 7th Street, 6th Street, 5th
Street, 4th Street.
Haven Avenue, Aspen Avenue, Spruce Avenue, Elm Avenue,
Milliken Avenue, 1200' E/O Milliken Avenue, 1000' W/O
Rochester Avenue, Rochester Avenue, Day Creek Boulevard,
Route 15, Etiwanda Avenue, Corn ell Avenue, East Avenue.
Haven Avenue, Utica Avenue, Cleveland Avenue, 1300' E/O
Cleveland Avenue, Milliken Avenue, Pittsburgh Avenue, 950'
E/O Pittsburgh Avenue, Buffalo Avenue, Rochester Avenue,
O1 d Rochester Avenue/Route 15.
Archibald Avenue, Lucas Ranch Road, Turner Avenue, Center
Avenue, Haven Avenue, Utica Avenue,
1300' E/O Uti ca Avenue, 1300' W/O Mil 1 i ken Avenue,
Mill iken Avenue, Pittsburgh Avenue, Buffalo Avenue, Route
15.
0
TABLE II1-1 (Continued)
SUMMARY OF LAND USE TYPE BY SUBAREA
USE TYPES
Agricultural/Nursery Sul~olies & Services
Animal Care
Automotive Fleet Storage
Automotive RentaVLeasing
Automotive/Light Truck Repair-Minor
Automotive/Truck Repair-Major
Automotive Sales
AutomotNe Service Court
Automotive Service Station
Building Contractors Office & Yards
Building Contractors Storage Yard
Building Maintenance Service
Building & Light Equipment Supplies & Sales
Business Sul:;~Dly Retail & Services
Business SuOport Services
Communication Services
Convenience Sales & Services
Eating & Ddnking Establishments
Entertainment
Extensive Impact Commercial
Fast Food Sales
Financial, Insurance & Real Estate Services
Food & Beverage Sales
Funeral & Crematory Services
Heavy Equipment Sales & Rentals
Hotel/Motel
Indoor Wholesale/Retail Commercial
Laundry Services
MedicaVHealth Care Services
Personal Services
Petroleum Products Storage
Recreation Facilities
ReiDair Services
Specialty Building Supplies & Home Improvement
P P p
c c c
c
P c
P p p
P c c c
c
P p P P P
c c c
c c c c c
P P P c c c
P c p c c p
P c p c P
c c c
c
c c c c c c c c c c c c
P C P C C P p p p p
P
P P P P P P P P P P P P
P C P C C P P C P C C P
P P P P P P P P P P P P P
C C
P P C P P C P P P C C P P p p C P P
P P P P P P P C P P P P C P P
C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C
P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P
C C C C C C C C C
C
C C C C C C C C C C C
P C C P P P C C P p p
C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C
C C
CCC C
P P
C
P P p
P C C C
C C C C
C C C C P
P
C C C C C C C
P P P P
C
P P
C C C C C C C P C
CCC CC CC CC
C C C C C C
C C C C C C C C P C C C P P P P p
P P C P P P P P P P P C
C
NOTES:
IP IndusWial Park
HO Haven Av~ O'aday Dislrict
GI Genefll IndusWill
MI/HI - Minimum Impact Heavy InduslTial
HI Heavy Indu. slrial
Permitted Use
Conditionally Permitted Use
Non-ma~kld Use Not Permitrid
Pd ,-
Revised:6/03/92
TABLE II1-1
SUMMARY OF LAND USE TYPE BY SUBAREA
USE TYPES
MANUFACTU RING
Custom
Light
M~lium
Hea~
Minimum Impact Heavy p
OFFICE PROFESSIONAL, DESIGN & RESEARCN: ::~ i: :i!i~:i:!: ~::i :~. ~:.:i: :~.~::~:i: :~i ~!:!i~ ~.i;i :!: :~!::~ :!~:i:.i.
Administrative &Office P c C C P P C
Professional/Design Services P c c c P P c
Research Services p p p p p p p p
P P P P P P P P P P P P P
P P P P P P P P P P P P P
C C C P C P P p p p p
P
C P C C
C P C C
P P P P P
P P
P P
P P
P P
P P
WHOLESALE, STORAGE & DISTRIBUTION
Public Storage
Light
Medium
Heavy
MATERIALS: RECOVERY FACILITIES
Collection Facilities
Processing Facilities
Scrap Operation
CIVIC
Administrative Civic Services
Cultural
Extensive Impact Utility Facilities
Flood Control/Utility Corridor
Public Assembly
Public Safety & Utility Services
Religious Assembly
C C P C C P C C C C P
P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P
C P P C P p p p p p p p
C P C p
P P P P P P P P P
C C C C C
P P P
C C C
C
P P P P P P P p P P P P P
P C C C C C C C C
C C C C C C
P P P P P P P P P P P
C C C C C C C C C C C C C
C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C
C C C C C C C C C C C C C
NOTES:
IP - fndusrral Park
HO - Haven Overlay District
GI - General Industrial
MI/HI - Minimum impact Heavy Industrial
HI - Heavy InduSlTcal
P Permitted Use
C Conditionally Permitreel Use
'""] - Non-marked Uses not Peffnitled
Revised: 6/03/92
SECONDARY (88 ft. ROW)
o Vineyard
o Hel 1 man
o 6th1 East of Devore Freeway
o Turner
o Jersey
Setleolt from P.L. -
31 ft. Itfe®teeele
amid Imdldlel letleek
1See Subarea 15, Special Consideration
LOCAL INDUSTRIAL (66 ft. ROW)
o cteveJ~.~J
o 8th
o 9th
o Center
o Santa Antta
o (Old) Rochester
o 7th West of Haven
0
eel leNiN letSeel
PART IV OVERLAY DISTRICTS & SUBAREA DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS
INTRODUCTION
This part provides development standards for the
individual subareas of the I.S.P. and for
specific sections of Haven Avenue which crosses
through the industrial area. Because of the
City-wide significance of Haven Avenue as the
major entry into the City, the Haven Overlay
District provisions have been placed at the
beginning of this part followed by those of the
subarea's.
The purpose of preparing subarea development
standards is to identify the most prominent
development standards applied within each of the
1B subareas in the industrial area. For each
subarea the following categories have been
identified and discussed:
- Land Use Designation
- Primary Function
- Permitted Uses
- Conditional Uses
- Access and Circulation
- Minimum Parcel Size
- Setback Requirements
- Landscape Area Requirements
- Performance Standards
- Special Considerations
The list described above does not intend to
cover every specific development requirement
which may be utilized in developing within the
industrial area, but does provide a quick
overview of the major development considerations
within each subarea. Any person interested in
developing within the boundaries of the Specific
Plan should refer to both Parts II and III of
this plan for an indepth discussion of all the
development constraints, opportunities, and
standards. Any special conditions which may
provide exception or modification to development
requirement are discussed within the "Special
Consideration" topic of each subarea.
FIG. IV- 12
Z
>
't
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
,,,,% ass
oC ollOO
CIRCULATION
RAIL SERVICE
ttttt
120' R.O.W.
IOO' R.O.W.
68' of leas A.O W
ProPosed
TRAILS/ROUTES
ram) Aceell Pomle
Fife Slate
Shiftlit SlaIKN~
Note: Parcel lieIs INI lot coaligufifUmts we ellown its ~oxN~ ~.
~ ~el ~own Ny ~l ~ cment~ owned n~ ie the ~cll~ de ~c~.
f~ ~t~ of · ere / n ~at~n of a ~o~le ~e ~ hi
Ny ~ md~ted ore ~ m b ~y eve.
0 400' UUU' m.
Hevised: 2111/88
SUBAREA 10 (Continued)
Access and Circulation
120' Right-of-Way- Milliken
66' Right-of-Way - Old Rochester 7th Street
All other Local Streets
C1 evel and
Minimum Parcel Size
One (1) acre
Setback Requirements
(Measured from ulti-
mate face of curb)
Average
Landscaping Parking
Mil 1 iken 45' 25'
(Old) Rochester 25' 15'
7th and all other " "
1 ocal streets
Building
45'
25'
Landscapi'ng Requi red
10% of the net lot area
SUBAREA 10 (Continued)
Performance Standards
Noise: The maximum allowable noise level of any use
shall not exceed 75 dn as measured at the lot 1 i ne of
the lot containing 'tt~e use. Where a use occupies a lot
abutting residentialty zoned land, the noise level
shall not exceed 65 Ldn as measured at the common lot
line. Noise caused )Sy motor vehicles and trains are
exempted from this standard.
Vibration: All uses shall be operated so as not to
generate vibration discernible without instruments by
the average person beyond the lot upon which the source
is located. Vibration caused by motor vehicles,
trains, and temporary construction or demolition is
exempted from this standard.
Particulate Matter and Air Contaminants: In addition
to compliance with the Air Quality Maintenance District
{A)D} standards, all uses shall be operated so as not
to emit particulate matter or air contaminants which
are readily detectable without instruments by the
average person beyond any 1 ot 1 i ne of the 1 ot
contai ni ng such uses.
Odor: All uses shall be operated so as not to emit
matter causing unpleasant odors which are perceptible
to the average person beyond any lot line of the lot
contai ni ng such uses.
Special Considerations:
Humidity, Heat and Glare: All uses shall be operated
so as not to produce humidity, heat, glare or high-
intensity illumination which is perceptible without
instruments by the average person beyond the lot line
of any 1 ot contai ni ng such uses.
Parcels which adjoin existing or proposed lead/spur
rail lines as indicated on the Subarea Map are required
to be developed in accordance with Rail Service
Standards {Part III, Section G, Appendix D).
FIG. IV- 13
CIRCULATION
~ 120' R.O.W.
1OO' R.O.W.
I1' ol* 18l, I R.O.W.
RAIL SERVICE
I I I I I ExistMe
++tt+- I~olmeee
TRAILS/ROUTES
0 0 0 0 Peleelrlaa
· t · · Bicycle
~ Seecud S~eellcll~l/
.................... Poeee Line/
UIIIly Eaeeseel
Ieeel Cllekl · CliIIIIil
I I
~ 1
Acceee PoInll
4~. Shen'llf Stagon
I 71h
0 400' 800' 1600~
Note: Poecol IlkIs Iml k)l configurations we Ik)wn Is Ipiaoxknalkm only.
I The dial shown may nol be curieoily owned nnx Ii the location de specific.
The deplclioe of I ills II in indication of m plojected h/lie ~ that
;n/y be adJelled over lime el tile Clly devek)la.
SUBAREA 11 {Continued}
Conditional Uses
Access and
Circulation
Administrative and Office
Professional/Desi gn Services
Public Storage
Animal Care
Automotive Fleet Storage
Automotive Service Station
Convenience Sales and Services
Fast Food Sales
Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Services
Food and Beverage Sales
Heavy Equipment Sales and Rental s
Indoor Whol esal e/Retai 1 Commercial
Medical/Heal th Care Services
Personal Services
Petrol eum Products Storage
Processing Facilities
Recreati on Faci 1 i ties
Extensive Impact Util i ty Facil i ties
Public Assembly
Public Safety and Utility Services
Religious Assembly
120'
Right-Of-Way - 6th Street
Mil 1 i ken
SUBAREA 1l (Continued}
66' Right-Of-Way - 7th Street (west of Rochester~
All other Local Streets
Cleveland
Utica
Minimum Parcel Size
One-half (1/2) acre
Setback Requirements
(Measured from ulti-
mate face of curb)
6th
Milliken
New Rochester
Cleveland
Average
Landscaping
45'
Im
3925'
7th and all 25'
other local streets
Parking Building
5 ' 45 '
2015' ;3)'25'
5' 25'
Landscaping Requirements
Performance Standards
12% of the net lot area
Noise: The maximum allowable noise level of any use
shall not exceed 75~n as measured at the lot line of
the lot containing e use. Where a use occupies a lot
abutting residentially zoned land, the noise level
shall not exceed 65L n as measured at the common lot
line. Noise caused ~y motor vehicles and trains are
exempted from this standard.
Vibration: All uses shall be operated so as not to
generate vibration discernible without instruments by
the average persons beyond the lot upon which the
source is located. Vibration caused by motor vehicles,
trains, and temporary construction or demolition is
exempted from this standard.
SUBAREA 12
Land Use Designation
Industrial Park
Primary Function
Permitted Uses
Conditional Uses
This area wil 1 provide for a high quality character to
several entryways to the City. This area will also
provide an opportunity for tourist oriented uses such
as hotels and motels which relate to the airport
activities. The subarea is located east of M~/t~
Mil 1 i ken, west of Devote Freeway, south of future
alignment of 5th Street to 4th Street and extends along
Milliken to 6th Street.
Custom Manufacturing
Light Manufacturing
Admi nistrati ve and Office
Professi onal/Desi gn Services
Research Services
Light Wholesale, Storage and Distribution
Building Maintenance Services
Business Supply Retail & Services
Business Support Services
Communi cati on Services
Eating and Drinking Establis)ents
Financial, Insurance and Real Estate
Hotel/Motel
Recreational Faci 1 i ties
Admi nistrati ve Civic Services
Flood Control/Util i ty Corridor
Services
Automotive Rental/Leasing
Automotive Sales
Automotive Service Station
Convenience Sales and Services
Entertainment
Fast Food Sales
Food and Beverage Sales
Medical/Heal th Care Services
Personal Services
Cultural
Public Assembly
Public Safety and Utility Services
Religious Assembly
Ii[~! ~til~tI
lllllllm r~:
FIG. IV-14
CIRCULATION
.m
..
RAIL SERVICE
120' R.O.W.
1OO' R.O.W.
88' of lees RO.W.
TRAILS/ROUTES
0 0 0 0 Pedevlmlln
· · · · Skytie
....................Power Line
....................
Utdlty Eesemenl
i I
I' I
ram), AcceB8 Pole.,
Fie SIaUoil i
Shefrill Sialira
Note: Parcel Blame and lot coellguflUone me allown as alalaosllealkan only.
~ des shown my o4)1 lie CuffentJy ow~ed hoe 18 lhe location life specific.
The depktloe of · ins is ae indication of · Ixole~led NIwO need thai
my b4 Nileled Om INn aee CAy eve.
0 400' UO0'
Hevised: 5/2/90
SUBAREA 12 (Continued)
Access and Circulation
120' Right-of-Way- 4th 6th
Mil 1 i ken
100' Ri ght-of-Way - New Rochester
SUBAREA 12 (Continued)
66' Right Of Way - (Old) Rochester
Pittsburgh
All other Local Streets
Minimum Parcel Size
Two (2) acres on parcels adjacent to 4th Street; and
One {1) acre on remaining area.
Setback Requirements
(Measured from face
of curb)
Landscaping Requi red
Performance Standards
A v era ge
Landsca ping Parking Bui 1 di ng
4th 45' 25' 45'
6 t h " " "
M i 11 i ken " " "
New Rochester " " "
O1 d Rochester 25' 15' 25'
Pittsburgh and " " "
all other local
streets
15% of net lot area
Noise: The maximum allowable exterior noise level of
any use shall not exceed 65~n as measured by any
location on the lot occupied y such uses. Where a
structure is occupied by more than one use, the noise
level shall not be in excess of 60 dn as measured
within the interior space of ~e neighboring
establishment. Noise caused by motor vehicles are
exempted from this standard.
FIG. IV-20
8UE AF EA 18
I'itlll
A.T.& S.F.R.R
fllil
IIIIII
Subel 11
I
IIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIII
· ~411)lrlll tO
Sth St
Slsms 12
IIIIIi111,
4lh SI
.CI~"UI, ATKXt
120' R.O.W.
'~Oe' ItO.W.
If OR LESS R.O,W.
RAL SER~BC:E
I I I I I [ EX~TIIiG
Iletlltll PlqC)PO~O
TRALI/ROUT!I
~ 91m~CIAL ITREETSC..AI~/
LAII)~CAPIIG
. UTIUTY EASEMENT,
e J CIIIEEKS & CHANNELS
I I
I Im
<~9t~.llmF STATION
(~FtFI~ STAllON'
· 4(m~ IoO' mooe
Nots: Pitoil Ilnel end lot oonflguratlenl Ire showS IS lpprOxlmatlOnl only.
The site shown may not ime eeriehey owned nee Is lie lociIon sill opecIris.
The dotMotion ol s site i in indication M I IIf~ future need that nay lie
HJuated over time ee the CitV doveIsle.
81
SUBAREA 18
Land Use Designation
Primary Function
General Dynamics Rancho Cucamanga
Specific Plan 93-01
The function of the subarea is to provide for a mixed-
use development oriented around an 18-hole golf
course. This subarea is located south of the A.T. &
S.F. tracks, west of Milliken Avenue, north of 4th
Street, and east of Cleveland Avenue and Utica Avenue.
Uses allowed and development standards are addressed in
a separate document: the General Dynamics Rancho
Cucamonga Subarea 18 Specific Plan. In the event of a
conflict between the Industrial Area Specific Plan and
the Subarea 18 Specific Plan, the Subarea 18 Specific
Plan shall control.
ORDINANCE N0. 525
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO OrAMDNGA CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SPECIFIC PlAN
93-01, THE SUBAREA 18 SPECIFIC PLAN, AND MAKING
Recitals.
(i)
On January 26, F~h~a~y 23, and March 23, 1994, tb~ Planning
Oa~i~,~ssion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted meetings on
the Specific Plan. On January 26, and continued to F~_brlklry 23,
1994, and on April 27, 1994, the Commission conducted duly noticed
public hearings on the related Environmental Impact Report. On
April 27, 1994, the Commission conducted a duly noticed public
hearing concerning the recc~mBrr~d adoption of the Subarea 1B
Specific Plan, hereinafter referred to as the "Plan".
(ii)
On June 1, 1994, the City Council of the City of Rancho OM?~morr/a
conducted a duly noticed public hearing omoeming the adoption of
the Plan.
(iii)
The Plan comprises approximately 380 acres of land beanded on the
south by 4th Street, on the east by Milliken Avenue, on the north
by the A.T. & S.F. (Metrolink) Railroad, and on the west by
Cleveland Avenue and Utica Avenue, all as referenced in the
Conceptual Land Use Plan, Figure 4-4, of the Plan.
(iv)
On file in the City Clerk's office, and incorporated herein by this
reference, is a full, true, and correct copy of the Plan.
(v)
All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance
have occurred.
NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho O~camonga does
hereby find, determine, and ordain as follows:
Tnis Council hereby specifically firas that all of the facts as set
forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and
Prior to the adoption of this Ordinance, this Council has reviewed
the Final Environmental Lmpact Report for the Plan, General Plan
93-02A and Industrial Specific Plan Amendment 93-03 and certified
the Report, including adoption of a Statement of Overriding
Considerations, in compliance with the California Environmental
Quality Act of 1970, as amended, arE1 the Guidelines prceulgated
Ordinance No. 525
Page 2
Prior to the adoption of this Ordinance, this Council ban adopted
General Plan Amerament No. 93-02A and Industrial Specific Plan
Amendment 93-03.
This Council hereby finds that the Plan b~ been drafted to
include, in text and acccmpany~ diagrams, all of the information
as follows:
ae
The distribution, location, and extent of the land uses,
including open space, within the area covered by the Plan; and
The proposed distribution, location, extent, and intensity of
major components of public and private transportation, sewage,
water, drainage, solid waste disposal, enercly, and other
essential infrastructure propused to be located within the
area of the Plan and needed to support the land uses described
in the Plan; and
The standards and criteria by which development will proceed
for land uses within the Plan and standards for the
conservation, development and utilization of natural
resources, where applicable, within the area of the Plan; and
de
A description of the implementation measures, including
regulations, programs, public works projects, and financ/ng
measures necessary to carry out those provisions referenced in
subparagra[~bs a, b, and c above within the area of the Plan.
This Council hereby adopts Specific Plan 93-01, the Subarea 18
Specific Plan, on file in the City Clerk's office and ~rated
herein by this reference, subject to each and every envircrmmntal
mitigation measure set forth in full, in the '~itigation Monitaring
Plan" for the Rancho Cucamonga ~ial Area Specific 18 Specific
Plan Rr~,,, and subject to the following conditions:
l)
Within 45 days of City Council approval, a revised
Plan text, Final RTR, and Mitigation Monitoring
Plan incorporating the changes rec~m~ed shall be
for review and approval. Upon acce~canoe by the
C~,~unity Development Director, a total of 25
unbound, 3-hole punch, copies of these documents
shall be suknitted for distribution to the City
Council, the City Clerk, the Planning C~aseion,
and staff. In addition, one unbound original copy
each, and one executable copy each, on a 3.5 inch
cc~ diskette in a format acceptable to City,
shall be suhnitted.
Ord/nance No. 525
Page 3
o
2)
A copy of Planning C~,mission Resolution No 94-29 and this
Ordinance shall be included within the Plan text after the
title page.
3)
Utilities shall be undergrounded per Planning C~,,,,~.~eion
Resolution No. 87-96 , with the following understanding:
a)
4th Street - The golf course developer shall be
responsible for undergrounding along the golf course
frontage of 4th Street. Said undergrounding may be
deferred until the development of Planning Areas V, VI, or
VII, if secured by an in-lieu fee.
b)
6th Street - The golf course developer shall be
responsible for undergrounding utilities between Cleveland
Avenue and the westerly bou~ of Planning Area IX at
the time of the golf course development.
c) A. T. & S. F. Rail T.~ne - Utilities shall be un~
with the golf course development.
4)
The applicant shall prepare supplemental design guidelines to
create a distinguishing character for the 380 acre project.
The guidelines shall include unifying design concepts for
entry statements, signage, and street furniture (e.g.,
lighting standards, bollards, benches, etc.). The guidelines
shall be suhnitted for review and approval by the Planning
Oa~,~ssion prior to the application for develo[p_nt of any
planning area, except for the golf course.
Pursuant to provisions of California Public Resources Code Section
21089(b), this application shall not be operative, vested or final,
nor will building permite be issued or a map recorded, until (1)
the Notice of Determination (NOD) regarding the associated
environmental action is filed and posted with the Clerk of the
Board of Supervisors of the County of San Bernardino; and (2) any
and all required filing fees assessed pursuant to California Fish
and Game COde Section 711.4, together with any re~,{red harrllir~
charges, are paid to the County Clerk of the County of San
Bernar~tno.
In the event this application is determined exempt from such filin~
fees pursuant to the provisions of the California Fish and Game
of any required handling charge for filing a Certificate of Fee
Exemption, this condition shall be deemed null and void.
Ordinance No. 525
Page 4
The Mayor shall sign and the City Clerk shall certify as to the
adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published
within 15 days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley
Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the
City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, California.
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
June 15, 1994
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
Robert C. Dominguez, Administrative Services Director
Joan A. Kruse, Purchasing Agent
A RESOLUTION UPDATING THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE
RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council adopt the attached Resolution implementing the City's
Comprehensive Fee Schedule.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
On an annual basis the City's Comprehensive Fee Schedule is reviewed and
amended where necessary, to include any modifications that have occurred over
the past year. Due to a legal procedural change in State law, this item was
pulled off of the May 4, 1994 agenda to comply with the new requirements, and
was readvertised. The Resolution as presented at the May 4 meeting contained
these modifications:
Fire District Plan Check and Inspection from a flat rate to provide a
more accurate accounting for tenant improvements
Addition to the Planning Section to include permitting for filming,
recycling facilities and large family day care centers
Incorporation of Community Services Department fees relating to
electrical usage and site rentals
Also included is an update of actual administrative staff, supervisor
and recreation leader costs for Community Services and certain
personnel costs within the Police Department.
Attached for your approval is a Resolution which incorporates current fee
categories. With the exception of the above, no other changes have been made.
tfu bmitted,
( ~ n~rez
vices Director
RCD:jak:j
Attach.
RESOLUTION NO. 94-091
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REPEALING RESOLUTION
NOS. 93-035, 92-223-A, 92-223-B, AND 92-223-C, AND
ESTABLISHING A NEW COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE FOR
PERMITS AND SERVICES PROVIDED BY ALL CITY DEPART-
MENTS, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
AND THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA POLICE DEPARTMENT, BY MOD-
IFYING CERTAIN FEES ESTABLISHED IN RESOLUTION 92-223
A. Recitals.
(i) The Government Code requires that prior to levying a new
fee or increasing an existing fee or service charge, local agencies shall hold
a public meeting at which oral or written presentations may be made; and
(ii) Notice of the time and place of the hearing has been
properly provided; and
(iii
City, and
No valid request for mailed notice is on file with the
(iv) Copies of the required data were made available in the City
Clerk's office to the public on April 15, 1994; and
occurred.
All legal prerequisites to adoption of this Resolution have
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does
hereby resolve that the following fees are established:
Section 1.0 Buildin~ and 5afety Fees:
1.0
A fee for each building permit or service shall be paid to the
Building Official as set forth in the following Schedule of
Fees:
Total Valuation of Work
$ 1.00 to $1,000.00
$25.00
1,001.00 to $2,000.00
$25.00 for the first
$1,000.00 plus $2.00 for
each additional $100.00 or
fraction thereof, to and
including $2,000.00.
-2-
$ 2,001.00 to $25,000.00
$25,001.00 to $50,000.00
$50,001.00 to $100,000.00
$100,000.00 and over
1.1 Plan Review Fees:
$45.00 for the first
$2,000.00 plus $7.50 for
each additional $1,000.00
or fraction thereof, to
and including $25,000.00.
$217.50 for the first
$25,000.00 plus $5.50 for
each additional $1,000.00
of fraction thereof, to
and including $50,000.00.
$355.50 for the first
$50,000.00 plus $4.00 for
each additional $1,000.00
or fraction thereof, to
and including $100,000.00.
$555.00 for the first
$100,000.00 plus $2.50 for
each additional $1,000.00
or fraction thereof.
(a)
When the valuation of proposed construction exceeds one
thousand dollars, and a plan is required to be submitted, a
plan review fee shall be paid to the Building Official at
the time of submittal of plans.
(b)
Plan review fees for buildings and structures shall be
equal to seventy-five percent (75%) of the building permit
fees set forth in Section 1.0 herein.
(c)
(d)
Plan review fees for electrical, mechanical and plumbing
work shall be equal to 25% of the total permit fee as set
forth under the pertinent Section 1.7, 1.8 and 1.9 herein.
Plan review fees for grading shall be as set forth in the
following schedule:
Quantity of Cut and Fill
Fee
50 - 100 yards $ 50.00
101 - 500 yards 100.00
501 - 1,000 yards 200.00
1,001 - 2,000 yards 250.00
2,001 - 3,000 yards 300.00
3,001 - 4,000 yards 350.00
4,001 - 5,000 yards 400.00
5,001 - 10,000 yards 500.00
10,001 - 50,000 yards 600.00
50,001 - 100,000 yards 700.00
100,001 - And up 900.00
-3-
The sum of cut and fill yardages shall be used in computing grading permit and
plan checking fees.
Additional Plan Checking made necessary due to changes in
plans or incomplete plan submission, $55.00 per hour for
the estimated time of checking revisions.
1.2 Compliance inspections/Reinspections
Inspections to determine compliance of existing construction
with applicable codes when not included in an active, valid
building permit or inspections made necessary due to work not
being ready at time specified, or work not corrected after prior
written correction notice ................................. $30.00
1-3 Chan~e of Occupancy:
Change of Occupancy Inspection ............................ $50.00
1.4 Relocated Buildings:
Fees for inspection of a structure to be relocated into or
within the City, shall be $100.00 when located within 25 miles
of City offices, plus $2.00 per mile, round trip, when located
more than 25 miles from City offices.
1.5 Appeal of Abatement Notice:
An appeal of a notice to abate a substandard or dangerous
building ................................................ $100.00
1.6 Inspection for Temporary Utility Connection or Temporary
Occupancy:
Inspection ............................................... $ 30.00
1.7 Inspections outside of normal business hours (minimum charge
four hours) ...................................... $50.00 per hour
1.8 Inspections for which no permit fee is specifically indicated
(minimum charge one-half hour) ................... $50.00 per hour
1.9 Electrical Permit Fees:
(a) Permit Issuance:
For issuing each permit .............................. $15.00
For issuing each supplemental permit ................. $ 4.50
-4-
(b) System Fee Schedule:
(NOTE: The following are in addition to permit-issuing fee.)
New Residential Buildings:
The following fees shall include all wiring and electrical
equipment in or on each building, or other electrical
equipment on the same premises constructed at the same
time.
For new residential buildings not including the area of
garages, carports and other noncommercial automobile
storage areas constructed at the same time, per square
foot ................................................. $ .035
For new garages, carports and other minor accessory
buildings constructed in conjunction with a new residential
building per square foot ............................. $ .02
For other types of residential occupancies and alterations,
additions and modifications to existing residential
buildings, use the UNIT FEE SCHEDULE.
Private Swimming Pools, Spas:
For new private residential, permanently installed spas,
hot tubs or swimming pools for single-family and multi-
family occupancies including a complete system of necessary
branch circuit wiring, bonding, grounding, underwater
lighting, water pumping and other similar electrical
equipment directly related to the operation of a swimming
pool, each .......................................... $ 30.00
For other types of swimming pools, spas and alterations to
existing swimming pools, use the UNIT FEE SCHEDULE.
Carnivals and Circuses:
Carnivals, circuses, or other traveling shows or
exhibitions utilizing transportable-type rides, booths,
displays and attractions.
For electric generators and electrically driven rides,
each ................................................ $ 15.00
For mechanically driven rides and walk'through attractions
or displays having electric lighting, each .......... $ 4.50
For a system of area and booth lighting, each ....... $ 4.50
For permanently installed rides, booths, displays and
attractions, use the UNIT FEE SCHEDULE.
-5-
Services:
For services of 600 volts or less and not over 200 amperes
in rating, each .................................... $ 18.50
For services of 600 volts or less and over 200 amperes to
1000 amperes in rating, each ....................... $ 37.50
'For services over 600 volts or over 1000 in rating,
each ............................................... $ 75.00
Temporary Power Service:
For a temporary service power pole or pedestal including
all pole or pedestal-mounted receptacle outlets and
appurtenances, each ................................ $ 15.00
For a temporary distribution system and temporary lighting
and receptacle outlets for construction sites, decorative
light, Christmas tree sales lots, firework stands, etc.,
each, .............................................. $ 7.50
(c) Unit Fee Schedule:
NOTE: The following are in addition to permit issuing fee.
Receptacle, Switch and Lighting Outlets:
For receptacle, switch, lighting or other outlets at which
current is used or controlled, except services, feeders and
meters. First 20, each ............................ $ .75
Additional outlets, each ........................... $ .45
NOTE: For multi-outlet assemblies, each 5 feet or fraction
thereof may be considered as one outlet.
Lighting Fixtures:
For lighting fixtures, sockets or other lamp-holding
devices. First 20, each ........................... $ .75
Additional fixtures, each .......................... $ .45
For pole or platform-mounted lighting fixtures, each $ .75
For theatrical-type lighting fixtures or assemblies,
each ................................................. $ .75
Residential Appliances:
For fixed residential appliances or receptacle outlets for
same, including wall-mounted electric ovens; counter-
mounted cooking tops; electric ranges, self contained room,
console, or through-wall air conditioners; space heaters;
food waste grinders; dishwashers; washing machines; water
-6-
heaters; clothes dryers; or other motor-operated appliances
not exceeding one horsepower (HP), kilowatt (KW), or
kilovolt-ampere (KVA), in rating, each ............. $ 3.00
NOTE: For other types of air conditioners and other motor-
driven appliances having larger electrical ratings, see
Power Apparatus.
Non-residential Appliances:
For residential appliances and self-contained factory-
wired, non-residential appliances not exceeding one
horsepower (HP), kilowatt (KW), or kilovolt-ampere (KVA),
in rating including medical and dental devices; food,
beverage, and ice cream cabinets; illuminated show cases,
drinking fountains, vending machines; laundry machines; or
other similar types of equipment, each ............. $ 3.00
NOTE: For other types of air conditioners and other motor-
driven appliances having larger electrical ratings, see
Power Apparatus.
Power Apparatus:
For motors, generators, transformers, rectifiers,
synchronous converters, capacitors, industrial heating, air
conditioners and heat pumps, cooking or baking equipment
and other apparatus, as follows:
Rating in horsepower (HP), kilowatts (KW), kilovolt-amperes
(KVA), or kilovolt-amperes-reactive (KVAR):
Up to and including 1, each ......................... $ 3.00
Over 1 and not over 10, each ........................ $ 7.50
Over 10 and not over 50, each ....................... $ 15.00
Over 50 and not over 100, each ...................... $ 30.00
Over 100, each ...................................... $ 45.00
NOTE:
1. For equipment or appliances having more than one motor,
transformer, heater, etc., the sum of the combined ratings
may be used.
2. These fees include all switches, circuit breakers,
contractors, thermostats, relays and other directly-related
control equipment.
-7-
Busways:
For trolley and plug-in-type busways, each 100 feet or
fraction thereof ................................... $ 4.50
NOTE: An additional fee will be required for lighting
fixtures, motors and other appliances that are connected to
trolley and plug-in-type busways. No fee is required for
portable tools.
Signs, Outline Lighting and Marquees:
For signs, outline lighting systems or marquees supplied
from one branch circuit, each ...................... $ 15.00
For additional branch circuits within the same sign,
outline lighting system or marquee, each ........... $ 3.00
Miscellaneous Apparatus, Conduits and Conductors:
For electrical apparatus, conduits and conductors for which
a permit is required but for which no fee is herein set
forth .............................................. $ 11.00
NOTE: This fee is not applicable when a fee is paid for
one or more services, outlets, fixtures, appliances, power
apparatus, busways, signs or other equipment.
1.10 Plumbing Permits:
(a) Permit Issuance:
For the issuance of each permit .................... $ 15.00
For issuing each supplemental permit ............... $ 4.50
(b) Unit Fee Schedule (in addition to issuance fee above):
For each plumbing fixture or trap or set of fixtures on one
trap (including water, drainage piping, and backflow
protection therefor) ............................... $ 6.00
For each building sewer and each trailer park sewer $ 15.00
Rainwater systems --per drain (inside building) $ 6.00
For each cesspool (where permitted) ................. $ 22.50
For each private sewage disposal system ............. $ 45.00
For each water heater and/or vent ................... $ 7.50
-8-
For each industrial waste pretreatment interceptor
including its trap and vent, excepting kitchen-type grease
interceptors functioning as fixture traps ........... $ 12.00
For installation, alteration, or repair of water piping
and/or water-treating equipment, each ............... $ 3.00
For repair or alteration of drainage or vent piping, each
fixture ............................................. $ 3.00
For each lawn sprinkler system on any one meter, including
backflow protection devices therefor ................ $ 9.00
For atmospheric-type vacuum breakers not included in lawn
sprinkler system:
1 to B .............................................. $ 7.50
over 5, each ........................................ $ 1.50
For each backflow protective device other than atmospheric-
type vacuum breakers:
2 inches and smaller ................................ $ 7.50
over 2 inches ....................................... $ 15.00
For each gas piping system of one to four outlets...$ 3.00
Swimming pool or spa piping including water heater (not
including gas piping) ............................... $ 10.00
1.11 Mechanical Permits:
A fee for each mechanical permit shall be paid to the
Building Official as set forth in the following Schedule of
Fees:
(a) Permit Issuance:
For the issuance of each permit ..................... $
15.00
For issuing each supplemental permit ............... $ 4.50
(b) Unit Fee Schedule (In addition to issuance fees above):
For the installation or relocation of each forced-air or
gravity-type furnace or burner, including ducts and vents
attached to such appliance, up to and including
100,000 Btu/h ....................................... $ 9.00
-9-
For the installation or relocation or each forced-air or
gravity-type furnace or burner, including ducts and vents
attached to such appliance over 100,000 Btu/h ...... $ 11.00
For the installation or relocation of each floor furnace,
including vent ..................................... $ 9.00
For the installation or relocation of each suspended
heater, recessed wall heater or floor-mounted unit heater
.................................................... $ 9.00
For the installation, relocation or replacement of each
appliance vent installed and not included in an appliance
permit .............................................. $ 4.50
For the repair of, alteration of, or addition to each
heating appliance, refrigeration unit, cooling unit,
absorption unit, or each heating, cooling, absorption, or
evaporative cooling system, including installation of
controls regulated by this code ..................... $ 9.00
For the installation or relocation of each boiler or
compressor to and including three horsepower, or each
absorption system to and including 100,000 Btu/h .... $ 9.00
For the installation or relocation of each boiler or
compressor over three horsepower to and including 15
horsepower, or each absorption system over 100,000 Btu/h
and including 500,000 Btu/h ......................... $ 16.50
For the installation or relocation of each boiler or
compressor over 15 horsepower to and including 30
horsepower, or each absorption system over 500,000 Btu/h
to and including 1,000,000 Btu/h .................... $ 22.50
For installation or relocation of each boiler or compressor
over 30 horsepower to and including 50 horsepower, or for
each absorption system over 1,000,000 Btu/h to and
including 1,750,000 Btu/h ........................... $ 33-50
For the installation or relocation of each boiler or
refrigeration compressor over 50 horsepower, or each
absorption system over 1,750,000 Btu/h .............. $ 56.00
For each air-handling unit to and including 10,000 cubic
feet per minute, including ducts attached thereto...$ 6.50
Note: This fee shall not apply to an air-handling unit
which is an integral portion of a factory assembled
appliance, cooling unit, evaporative cooler or absorption
unit for which a permit is required elesewhere in this
code.
For each air-handling unit over 10,000 cfm .......... $ 11.00
-10-
For each evaporative cooler other than portable type $ 6.50
For each ventilation fan connected to a single duct..$ 4.50
For each ventilation system which is not a portion of any
heating or air-conditioning system authorized by a permit
..................................................... $ 6.50
For the installation of each hood which is served by
mechanical exhaust, including the ducts for such hood $6.50
For the installation or relocation of each domestic-type
incinerator ......................................... $ 11.00
For the installation or relocation of each commercial
industrial-type incinerator ......................... $ 45.00
For each appliance or piece of equipment regulated by this
code but not classed in other appliance categories, or for
which no other fee is listed in this code ........... $ 6.50
1.12 Grading Permit Fees:
A fee for each grading permit shall be paid to the Building
Official as set forth in the following Schedule of Fees:
Quantity of Cut and Fill
50 cubic yards or less
51 to 100 cubic yards
101 to 1,000 cubic yards --
Fee
$15.00
$22.50
$22.50 for the first 100 cubic
yards plus $10.50 for each additional 100 cubic yards or
fraction thereof.
1,001 to 10,000 cubic yards -- $117.00 for the first 1,000
cubic yards, plus $9.00 for each additional 1,000 cubic
yards or fraction thereof.
10,001 to 100,000 cubic yards -- $198.00 for the first
10,000 cubic yards, plus $40.50 for each additional 10,000
cubic yards or fraction thereof.
100,001 cubic yards or more -- $562.50 for the first
100,000 cubic yards, plus $22.50 for each additional 10,000
cubic yards or fraction thereof.
1.13 Application for Plan Duplication
Application for duplication processing .............. $ 30.00
-11-
Section 2.0 Business License Fees
Fees for business licenses are found within Title 5 of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, Business Taxes, Licenses and
Regulations and contained in Chapters 5.04, 5.08, 5.12 and 5.16,
thereof.
Section 3.0 City Clerk Fees
Municipal Code
Supplements to the municipal code
will vary in cost and will be billed
accordingly.
$150.00
Variable
Section 4.0 Copying Rates, ~edia and Subscription Fees:
Fee Activity
Photocopies
Microfilming
Audio Tape
Computer Diskettes
Subscriptions:
Council Agenda
Minutes
Planning Commission Agenda
Minutes
Historic Preservation Comm. Agenda
Engineering Plans and Specifications
per set cost
Mailing Costs (Overnight) for above
Research Requests - All Departments
Time spent beyond 1/2 hour will be
billed in increments of 1/4 hr. at:
Fee
$ .25/page*
$ .25/page*
$1.00/plan page
$10.O0/tape
$ 5.00 diskette
$118.00/yr.
$145 00/yr.
$ 43.50/yr.
$160.00/yr.
$ 9.00/yr.
$Variable
$15.00
First 1/2 Hour No Charge
$ 25.00/Hr.
*There will be a minimum charge of $1.00 for 1-3 pages
-12-
FAX Requests - All Departments
A maximum of 6 pages may be requested.
If material requested is more than 6 pages,
material will be mailed and billed at rate
established by this Resolution.
No Charge
Section 5.0 Engineering Fees
5.1 Applications
Tentative Parcel Map
Initial Study
Tentative Parcel Map Appeal
Time Extension - Tentative
Parcel Map
Certificate of Compliance
Lot Line Adjustment
Amending Parcel Map
Street Vacation
Subordination Agreement
Release of Lien Agreement
Certificate of Correction
Flood Hazard Letter
Bond Substitution
Private Street Designation
Reimbursement Agreement Storm Drain
Street and Utilities
Traffic Study Review (Dev. Proj.)
5.2 Map and Plan Checking Fees
Property Legal Description
Map Checking
Residential Parcel Maps
Fee
$2,514.00
$ 225.00
$ 251.00
$ 549.00
$1,190.00
$1,190.00
$1,190.00
$1,156.00
$ 298.00
$ 298.00
$ 256.00
$ 314.00
$ 420.00
$ 495.00
$2,227.00
$2,827.00
$ 751.00
$ 584.00
$1,370 + $180 per Parcel
-13-
Tract Maps and Non-Residential
Parcel Maps of 10 lots or less
$2,070.00
Tract Maps and Non-Residential
Parcel Maps over 10 lots
5.3 Improvement Plans
$1,720 + $35 per
parcel or lot
Widening of existing streets
$1.35 per LF + sheet
charge for interior
streets
Interior Streets
1-2 sheets:
$1,370 per sheet
3-5 sheets:
$2,740 + $1,200 per
sheet over 2 sheets
6-10 sheets:
$6,340 + $1,095 per
sheet over 5 sheets
11 or more:
$11,815 + $1,025 per
sheet over 10 sheets
Storm Drain Plans -
Same as for interior
streets
Hydrology Study:
Drainage areas up to 150 acres
$1,370.00
Drainage areas over 150 acres
$2,740.00
Landscape and irrigation plans
for City-maintained areas
$ 400.00 per sheet
For maps and plans checking, the fees for rush checking, when
approved by the City Engineer, will be 50% greater than those listed
above. The fees for checking the revisions to approved plans will be
on the basis of actual costs at hourly rates as determined by the
City Engineer with a minimum fee of $100.00.
5.4 Public Works Construction
Permit Fee:
5% of Improvement Cost to $25,000; Min. $50
4.5% of Improvement Cost next $75,000
4% of Improvement Cost over $100,000
The improvement cost of a project shall be based on the Engineer's
Cost Estimate as shown on Surety Bond and as approved by the City
Engineer.
NOTE: Development Impact Fees may also apply and are addressed under
separate resolutions.
5.5
Oversize Loads
*Single Permit
*Repetitive Permit
*Annual Permit
-14-
$15.00
$70 initial fee + $15
per month renewal fee to
a maximum of 6 months
$70 per year
*These fees are based on the provisions of the California Vehicle
Code Section 35795 and Caltrans Fee Schedule.
Section 6.0 Fire Protection District Fees
(These fees have been adopted by the Fire Board)
6.1 Plans Checking and Inspections
6.1.1 Start-up fee for commercial, industrial or multi-
family dwelling units (paid prior to TRC) ......... $ 75.00
6.1.2 Plan review: building and/or system(s) inspection
A. Single family residential (per tract or phase)$ 120.00
B. Non-Residential development and multi-family
Residential dwelling .......................... $ 620.00
C1. Tenant improvements per suite or floor ........ $
(per hour cost, one hour minimum)
80.00
C2. Plan review/inspections of plans not otherwise
identified, e.g., aisle, access, hose racks,
seating, etc.(One hour minimum) Per hour cost $
60.00
C3. Minor plan reviews not requiring a District
inspection (e.g., parking lot sales, demising
walls, and other activities where fire regula-
tions do not apply - . ........................ No Charge
D. New Sprinkler Systems or over 10 heads ........ $ 150.00
Ten heads or less (alteration only) ........... $ 85.00
E. Fixed fire-extinguishing systems (i.e. carbon
dioxide, potassium bicarbonate, halon, etc.)..$ 135.00
F. Fire Alarm Systems ............................ $ 140.00
G. The charge for any revision of a previously approved
plan or a change request (form FSD-2) for any of the above,
shall be $85.00 per hour for the estimated time spent in
review but not less than 25% of the original fee.
101
-15-
H. Failure to keep consultation or field inspection
appointment without notification (one hour minimum)
60.00
I. Division consultation fees not otherwise stated (except
phone consultations) (one hour minimum) ........... $ 125.00
J. Fire flow test (one hour) ..................... $ 80.00
K. Consultant plan check fee shall be paid by the
developer/contractor or owner, and shall be paid prior to
plan approval (per hour) .......................... $ 40.00
L. Field inspection requiring more than the initial
inspection, plus one follow-up .................... $ 100.00
M. Field inspection of self-inspection occupancies who
have refused to conduct their own inspection ...... $ 54.00
N. Underground Tanks
1. Original application/plan check/tank inspection
(per tank) ................................ $ 135.00
2. Tank removal (per tank) .................... $ 115.00
3. Inspection(s) resulting from leaks of unauthorized
discharge (per tank) ....................... $ 60.00
O. Hazardous chemicals: application/plan check/inspection
(storage, handling or use as a solid, liquid or gas, other
than underground tanks)
1. 55 gallons corrosive liquid ................ $ 80.00
2. 500 pounds oxidizing material .............. $ 80.00
3. 10 pounds organic or inorganic peroxides...$ 90.00
4. 500 pounds nitromethane .................... $ 90.00
5. 1,000 pounds ammonia nitrate or fertilizer mixture
(any amount of highly toxic material, pyrophoric,
hypergolic, cryogenic material, poisonous gas or
radioactive material) ...................... $ 90.00
6. Any reactive, unstable or other hazardous
material not herein classified (extent or hazard
and allowable amount to be stored to be
determined by the Fire Marshal) ............ $ 125.00
P. Explosives and blasting agents:
cheek/inspection
Application/plan
1. Manufacture, possess, store or sell ........ $ 95.00
2. To use explosives or blasting agents ....... $ 140.00
102
-16-
Q. Fumigation and thermal insecticidal fogging when toxic
flammable fumigant is used: application/plan check/
inspection ........................................ $ 110.00
Section 6.2 Permit Fees
I. Permits (initial/single issuance or as otherwise noted)
A. General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or
operation not specifically described below, which in the
judgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce
conditions hazardous to life or property. (UFC Art.2.4)
............................................... $ 75.00
B. Storage of readily combustile material (UFC Art.11)
............................................... $ 105.00
C. Places of Assembly (except churches and schools)
Art. 25)
( UFC
1. A-3, 50-299 without stage .................. $
2. A-2.1,300 or more without stage ........... $
3. A-2,999 or less with stage ................ $
4. A-l, 1000 or more with stage ............... $
85.00
135.00
155.00
205.00
D. Bowling alley and pin refinishing (UFC Art. 26)$ 75.00
E. Cellulose nitrate plastic (Pyroxylin) (UFC Art. 27)
............................................... $ 75.00
F. Combustible fibers storage and handling exceeding 100
cubic feet (UFC Art. 28) ....................... $ 75.00
G. Garages
Motor vehicle repair (H-4) (UFC Art. 29) ....... $
75.00
H. Lumber yards (over 100,000 board feet) (UFC Art. 30)
............................................... $ 75.00
I. Tire rebuilding plants (UFC Art. 31) ........... $ 120.00
J. Auto wrecking yards ............................ $ 75.00
Junk or waste material handling plants (UFC Art. 34)
K. Flamm~ble finishes ............................. $ 75.00
Spraying or dipping operations, spray booths, dip tanks,
electrostatic apparatus, automobile undercoating, powder
coating and organic peroxides and dual component
coatings (UFC Art.45) (per spray booth)
L. Magnesium (more than 10 pounds per day) (UFC Art. 48)
............................................... $ 115.00
M. Oil burning equipment operations (UFC Art. 61).$ 75.00
-17-
N. Ovens (industrial baking and drying) (UFC Art. 62)
............................................... $ 75.00
O. Mechanical refrigeration (over 20 pounds of refrigerant)
(UFC Art. 63) .................................. $ 105.00
P. Compressed gases (store, handle or us exceeding 100
cubic feet) (UFC Art. 74)
non flamm~ble over 100 cubic feet and up to 5,999
cubic feet ................................. $
2. non flammable 6,000 to 12,000 cubic feet...$
3- non-flammable over 12,000 cubic feet ....... $
4. flammable over 100 cubic feet and up to
1,999 cubic feet ........................... $
5. flammable 2,000 to 6,000 cubic feet ........ $
6. flammable over 6,000 cubic feet ............ $
110.00
130.00
195.00
75.00
125.00
125.00
Q. Cryogenic fluids (storage, handling or use)
(UFC (Art. 75) ................................. $
75.00
R. Dust-producing processes and equipment (UFC Art.76)
............................................... $ 80.00
S. Flamm~ble and combustible liquids (storage or handling
or use) (U~C Art. 79)
1. auto fueling station (B-l) ................. $ 90.00
2. inside storage, less than 60 gallons ....... $ 80.00
3. inside storage, more than 60 gallons ....... $ 115.00
4. outside storage, more than 5000 gallons
(UFC 79.402) ............................... $ 115.00
T. High piled combustible stock (UFC Art. 81) ..... $ 90.00
U. Liquified petroleum gas (store, handle, transport
or use more than 120 gallons) (UFC Art. 82)...$ 75.00
V. Matches (more than 60 Matchman's gross) (UFC Art. 83)
............................................... $ 75.00
W. Welding and cutting operations to conduct welding and/or
cutting operations in any occupancy (UFC Art. 49)
............................................... $ 75.00
X. Alarm company permits (to install units within Fire
District) annual permit ........................ $ 95.00
II. Special Services
A. Board of appeals fee (to file an appeal and requiring a
-18-
special meeting) ............................... $ 225.00
B. Excessive or malicious false alarms causing response of
fire apparatus
Code 3 response due to "failure to notify"
fire department when working on or testing sprinkler
or fire alarm system
$140.00 per hour per piece emergency apparatus
responding 1/2 hour minimum
Trouble alarm Code 2 response due to failure to
notify fire department when working on or testing
system
$70.00 per hour per piece of emergency
apparatus responding 1/2 hour minimum
3. Malicious false alarms
$140.00 per hour per piece of emergency apparatus
responding with 1/2 hour mint~
4. Alarm system mslfunction resulting in Emergency Code
3 response
$140.00 per hour per piece of emergency apparatus
responding to all false alarms in excess of 2 false
alarms in 30 days with 1/2 hour minimum
5. Alarm systems malfunction resulting in a trouble
alarm Code 2 response
$70.00 per hour per piece of emergency apparatus
responding to all trouble alarms in excess of 2 in
30 days with 1/2 hour minimum
Code 3 response to false alarms due to negligence,
tampering with system construction or modification
of building
$140.00 per hour per piece of emergency apparatus
responding with 1/2 hour minimum
C. Response to mitigate extended hazardous chemical and
material incidents beyond normal service request (this
includes response to railroad properties, freeways, and
aircraft crashes)
1. Hazardous incident, per hour
$235 per hour per piece of apparatus
2. Company Response
105
-19-
$95.00 per hour per piece of equipment
3. Squad Response
$75.00 per hour
4. Company with Battalion Chief
$140.00 per hour
5. Hazardous materials or major transportation
incident response due to negligence
$150.00 per hour per piece of equipment
Response to mitigate major transportation incidents
(may include but not be limited to jetliner crash,
railroad derailment or collision, or major freeway
collision with extraordinary circumstances)
$150.00 per hour per piece of apparatus
D. Special Activities -- One time events (combination of
plan check, fire permit, field inspection. These events
may need the services, at permittees expense, of one or
more standby firemen).
1. Fireworks--public display (CCRT. 19)
$75.00 plus $1~0.00 per hour per piece of apparatus
2. Specialty public displays and/or sales (i.e.
Christmas tree lots, pumpkin sale lots) .... $
45.00
Conducting any blasting operation (for each four
hour period or fraction thereof)
$100 plus $140.00 per hour per piece of apparatus
Special events (public assembly, stage productions,
exhibits, previewing stands, grandstands and
bleachers, trade shows, concerts, banquets, etc.,
other than tents and air supported structures)
a. Less than 30,000 square feet at an occupant
load of 2,000, whichever is more restrictive
....................................... $ 125.00
3,000 square feet or more, but less than
60,000 square feet or an occupant load of
more than 2,000 but less than 4,000,
whichever is more restrictive .......... $
165.00
106
-20 -
60,000 square feet or more, but less than
90,000 square feet or an occupant load of
more than 4,000 but less than 6,000
whichever is more restrictive .......... $
200.00
90,000 square feet or more with an occupant
load of 6,000 or more, whichever is more
restrictive ............................ $ 235.00
5. Tents and air-supported structures (UFC Article 32)
a. Less than 400 square feet .................. $
b. 401 to 1500 sq. ft ......................... $
c. 1501 to 15,000 sq. ft ...................... $
d. 15,001 to 30,000 sq. ft .................... $
e. over 30,000 sq. ft ......................... $
75.00
100.00
130.00
160.00
190.00
Section 7.0 P]~ln~ Fees
7.1 Applications
Those charged as a base fee, plus a per unit or per acre
amount, with a maximum set at 3X base fee.
Application
Tentative Tract Map
Conditional Use Permit
Dev/Des Review Res (5 or more)
Dev/Des Review - Comm/
Industrial
Initial Study
General Plan Amendment
Spec/Comm Plan Amend.*
Dev Distr Amendment*
Base Fee Per Unit Fee Maximum Fee
$2,987 $60.00 per d/u $8,961.00
$2,921 $292.00 per acre $8,763.00
$2,851 $57.00 per d/u $8,553.00
$2,851 $285.00 per acre $8,553.00
$225 $22.00 per acre $ 675.00
$2,866 $287.00 per acre $8,598.00
$2,866 $287.00 per acre $8,598.00
$2,866 $287.00 per acre $8,598.00
*Should be charged at half rate if filed in conjunction with a
General Plan Amendment.
7.2 Applications
107
-21-
Those charged on a time-and-materials basis with a deposit taken
up front.
Application
EIR Review - Sensitive
Development Agreement Review
Mitigation Plan - Complex
Annexation
Development Agreement
New Specific/Community Plan
EIR Preparation
7.3 Other Application Fees
Application
Non-Construction CUP
Uniform Sign Program
Minor Exception
Dev/Design Review: 4 du's or less
Variance
Variance: 4 du's or less
Use Determination
Preliminary Review
Minor Development Review
Time Extension
Minor Time Extension
Sign Permit
Hillside Development Review 5 or more du's
Hillside Development Review 4 or less du's
Temporary Use Permit
Deposit Amount
$2,000.00
$2,000.00
$2,000.00
$2,000.00
$2,000.00
$5,000.00
$5,000.00
$ 435.00
$ 580.00
$ 170.00
$1,027.00
$ 871.00
$ 291.00
$ 315.00
$ 325.00
$ 296.00
$ 549.00
$ 136.00
$ 51.00
$1,462.00
244.00
68.00
108
-22-
Temporary Use Model Home
EIR Review Only
Landmark Application
Residential and Small Business
Landmark Alteration
Residential and Small Business
Mills Act Application
Residential and Small Business
Mitigation Plan (Simple)
Mitigation Plan (Complex)
$ 219.00
$2,370.00
$ 728.00
No Charge
$ 835.00
No Charge
$ 724.00
No Charge
$ 719.00
See 5.2
7-5 - Appeal Fees
Appeal of a City Planner Decision
Appeal of a Commission Decision
in Connection with an Application
Appeal of a Tract Map
7.6 - Other Fees
Entertainment Permit
Film Permit
Home Occupation Permit
Large Family Day Care Permit
Recycling Facilities Permit
Status Map Application
Tree Removal/New Development
Tree Removal/Existing Development
$ 62.00
$ 126.00
$ 251.00
$ 571.00
$ 99.50
$ 53.00
$ 170.o0
$ 296.00
$ 15.00
$ 432.00
$ 72.00
NOTE: Planning Division fees for documents, which are
individually priced, are contained in the Document Price List
Section 8.0 - Recreation Fees
Following are current fees for recreation activities
rentals. All consumable costs are to be recovered.
and
109
-23-
Definition of classes of fees by groups.
Group 1: City of Rancho Cucamonga sponsored and co-sponsored
events; other governmental agencies serving Rancho Cucamonga
residents.
Group 2: City resident not-for-profit, civic, athletic, social
organizations whose management is not paid and organizations
sponsoring a public forum or candidate's night.
Group 3: City resident not-for-profit, civic, athletic, social
organizations which has paid management.
Group 4: City resident private party activity, City resident
employee organizations, City resident political candidate use
for fund raisers; City resident college organizations and
committees; work parties and social events.
Group 5: City resident commercial, business, profit-making and
religious organizations, non-resident not-for-profit, civic and
social organizations, non-resident colleges, their organizations
and committees, non-resident private party activity, non-
resident employee associations.
Group 6: Non-resident commercial, business, profit-making and
religious organizations.
Neighborhood and Commity Park Lighted Sports Venue Fees
Commencing September 1, 1993, each user group shall be charged
fees equal to seventy-five percent (75%) of the costs of electricity used to
provide light to that user group based on the most recent rates published by
Southern California Edison (SCE). Commencing September 1, 1994, fees will be
charged at one hundred percent (100%).
Upon acceptance by the City of new parks in Rancho Cucamonga, a
use fee of 100% of the full light costs shall be implemented. This fee shall
include electrical usage and demand charges as outlined by Southern California
Edison (SCE) rate policies. This use fee will be updated annually or as rate
policies by SCE are amended.
Classes/Workshops
Classes and workshops shall be structured on a cost-covering
basis, and fees shall be set based upon the market rate of similar programs
provided in the cities of Chino, Fontana, Ontario and Upland.
110
-24-
follows:
rate.)
Facility Rentals: Hourly fees for week day and Saturday use as
(Sunday and holiday use will be charged the 5:00 p.m. to 8:00 a.m.
Building Rentals Hourly Fee
ROOM TIME 1 2
SIZE
GROUP
3 4 5 6
Small 8am-Spm None $ 3-75 $ 7.50 $15.00 $15.00 $30.00
Small 5pm-8am None $ 7.50 $12.00 $25.00 $25.00 $50.00
Large 8am-Spm None $ 5.00 $10.00 $29.00 $25.00 $50.00
Large 5pm-8am None $10.00 $15.00 $35.00 $35.00 $70.00
Kitchen (Flat Rate)
Small None $10.00 $15.00 $20.00 $25.00 $30.00
Large None $20.00 $25.00 $30.00 $35.00 $40.00
Other Fees
The facilities rental fee shall be charged for fund raisers, plus ten percent
(10%) of the gross and, if additional City staff is required, $7.50 per hour
for the staff time. When a damage deposit is required, the charge is $200.00.
Per Day Charges
Coffee Pot (small)
Coffee Pot (large)
Small Stage
Large Stage
T.V. W/video player
Microphone
Small PA system
Slide Projector
Professional Style Lights
Piano at RCNC
$ 2.00
$ 5.00
$10.00
$50.00
$20.00
$ 5.00
$40.00
$10.00
$ 3.00/light
$25.00
(The piano is tuned by the City twice a year. If the piano does not meet the
standards of the user, the City will arrange for tuning at the user's sole
expense. Tuning fees will be added to rental cost.)
Comity Amphitheater: The following are rental fees for
amphitheaters. The first hour of monitoring is included in the stage rental
for Groups 2 and 3.
GROUP
USAGE 1 2 3 4 5 6
Stage-flat fee None
Sound Monitor/hrly None
$25.00 $40.00 $72.00 $80.00 $95.00
$10.00 $10.O0 $26.75 $26.75 $35.00
111
-25-
Equestrian Center Fees and Cha~ges will be as follows:
USE GROUP
1 2 3 4 5 6
*Hourly Room Rentre1
**Daily Snack Bar/
Kitchen
N/C $ 5.00 $ 5.00 $ 7.00 $ 7.00 $ 7.00
***Lights
75% ACTUAL ENERGY CONSUMPTION (1993-94)
Annual Shared N/C $75.00 N/A N/A N/A N/A
Storage Fee
*Includes use of P.A. System.
**A deposit may be required for this use. (See Equestrian Usage Policies.)
***The small arena will have a coin metered box for electrical cost recovery.
The large arena will recover electrical cost via direct billing for
actual use.
Sports Complex Tournament Fees
Rental Fees Per Field
Group I & II
Group III thru VI
Field Rental *$50.00 *$230.00
Deposit 20.00 75.00
Infield Lining 8.00 8.00
Light Fee Actual Cost Actual Cost
*Includes initial field dragging and watering. The deposit will be
applied to the total rental fee.
When additional City staffing is required for tournaments and/or special event
programs scheduled at the Adult Sports fields, the following facility use fees
shall be charged.
Custodian
Park Maintenance Worker
Community Service Supervision
Community Service Administration
Facility/Park Supervision
Recreation Leader
Light Fees
$21.00/hour
$23.00/hour
$29.00/hour
$49.00/hour
$33.00/hour
$11.00/hour
Actual Cost
112
-26-
Park Tournaments: A $50.00 non-refundable deposit is
required to reserve fields. Said deposit shall apply to final field rental
totals. Should there be a need for City staff to oversee and coordinate
activities, the fee is $11.00 per hour.
The requestor shall meet all liability insurance requirements for usage of
facilities and provide additional equipment needed to hold the tournament at
their own cost.
GROUP
USAGE 1 2 3 4 5 6
Per Day None $20.00 $30.00 $70.00 $70.00 $125.00
Snack Bar: For City-owned snack bars located in City Parks.
GROUP(S)
USAGE 1 2 3 - 6
Seasonal None $450.00 N/A
Other non-profit groups bringing in snack bars (i.e. trailers) will be charged
a flat $300.00 seasonal permit fee, unless group is participating in a City
sponsored event.
Ster~e: For City-owned storage located in City parks
USAGE 1 2 3 - 6
SEASONAL None $ 75.00 N/A
· on-Resident Charge: A $5.00 fee shall be paid by each
non-resident, each class, each team, each season to participate in City-
sponsored classes. Said fee is payable at the time of registration. Does not
include one day activities or any trips sponsored by the City.
Section 9.0 - Rancho Cucamon~a Sheriff Department Fees
Description
Fingerprinting
Criminal Reports
Traffic Accident Reports
Traffic Accident Reports - Mail
Criminal History Letters
Bicycle License
*Special Event Jobs
Fee
$ lo.oo
$ 20.00
$ 20.00
$ 20.00
$ lo.oo
$ 3.00
No Charge
113
-27-
Public Information Clerk - Hourly
Station Clerk - Hourly
Station Clerk Supervisor - Hourly
Secretary - Hourly
Secretary II - Hourly
Forensic Specialist II - Hourly
Community Services Officer - Hourly
Deputy Reserve- Hourly
Deputy II - Hourly
Deputy III- Hourly
Sergeant - Hourly
Lieutenant - Hourly
Captain - Hourly
Vehicle Cost - Hourly
*There is no fee for special events.
$ 14.00
$ 16.00
$ 18.00
$ 17.00
$ 19.00
$ 35.00
$ 2o .oo
$ 31.00
$ 57.00
$ 58.00
$ 64.00
$ 74.00
$ 82.00
$ 85.00
However, if security services
are required for the event such as regular or reserve officers, or
private security, these fees are separate.
Section 10.0 - Nlsoellaneous Fee8
Amendment to tax statements for prepaid assessments
............................................ $ 20.00
Bingo License $ 50.00
Calculation for 1915 Bond Act Assessment Districts
............................................ $ 7.50
Dog Licensing See Resolution 81-79
Filming Permits
Business License Tax
Application Fee (Planning Fees)
Basic Fee for each day of filming
Investigation Fee
$ 20.00
$ 129.00
$ 132.50
$ 110.00 per
filming day
Fire Department $ 100.00 per Hr.*
*per hour for each 3-man piece of equipment
114
-28-
Police Department** (See Sheriff Fees)
**Number and type of personnel is determined
by the station commander after reviewing plans
for the event.
Home Park Rent Mediation - Filing Fee
Home Park Rent Mediation - Appeal Fee
Industrial Bond Development Bond Application
A fee of 1/4 of 1% of the established maximum
amount of the proposed bond application and
not less than
Massage Establishment Application
Massage Technician Application
Massage Outcall Service
Renewal Massage Establishment Appl.
Renewal Massage Tech. Application
Renewal Massage Outcall Service
School Fees - Please refer to Ordinance
Nos. 69-C and 74 regarding these fees.
Solicitor (Non-profit) identification badge
Taxicab Service Application
Taxicab Driver's Permit Application
Taxicab Service Application Renewal
Taxicab Driver's Permit Appl. Renewal
15.00
300.00
$1,25o.oo
$ 225.00
$ 178.00
$ 90.00
$ lll.00
$ 90.00
$ 45.00
$ 5.00 each
$ 95.00
$ 120.00
$ 45.00
$ 60.00
115
-29-
c. Effective Date:
This Resolution shall become effective with its adoption.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 15th day of June 1994.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Dennis L. Stout, Mayor
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk
I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed,
approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 15th day of
June, 1994.
Executed this 16th day of June 1994 at Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk
116
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
June 15, 1994
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
Brad Buller, City Planner
Alan Warren, Associate Planner
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 94-01A
- WESTERN LAND PROPERTIES - A proposal to amend the
General Plan Land Use Element Map to change the land use
designation from Office to Community Commercial for 25
acres bounded by Foothill Boulevard on the south, Spruce
Avenue on the west, Church Street on the north and Elm
Avenue on the east - APN: 1077-42]-58 and 63- Related
File: Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment 94-0]-
Planning Commission recommends issuance of a Negative
Declaration.
The Planning Commission reco~nends that the City Council approve General
Plan Amendment 94-01A changing the land use designation from Office to
Community Commercial for the subject properties through the adoption of
the attached Resolution of Approval. Further, the Planning Commission
recommends that the City Council approve the issuance of a Negative
Declaration for the application-
~CI~I~OI~ND ~ ANA~'rSIS
At its May 1 ], 1994 meeting, the Planning Commission reviewed the
subject application and made the recommendation described above. In
arriving at their recommendation, the Planning Comission considered the
following issues:
The initial environmental review focused on potential air quality
and traffic concerns. The impacts of both were determined not to
be significant, although special consideration of the on-site
circulation pattern was noted as an important element to be
considered in the shopping center design.
The applicant provided an economic market study which indicated the
commercial acreage in the comunity and target market area could be
increased without negative economic consequences- An independent
review of the study suggested that additional commercial land would
be appropriate for specific retail product lines (home furnishings
117
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
GPA 94-01A - WESTERN LAND PROPERTIES
June 15, 1994
Page 2
and appliances, electronic equipment, quality restaurants, and such
specialty goods as toys, books, sporting goods, and music) in which
the City currently experiences significant sales loss.
The site is an appropriate location for additional comercial
development and does not present any significant difficulties with
the surrounding land use designations.
FACTS
Based on the facts and conclusions listed above, staff believes the City
Council can make the following findings regarding this application:
The property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed
land use and development district designation in terms of access
and size, as evidenced by the site's location on the City's primary
commercial arterial, and is immediately adjacent to existing major
community commercial development; and
The proposed amendments would not have significant impacts on the
environment nor the surrounding properties as evidenced by the
findings and conclusions of the Initial Environmental Study which
indicated that no significant impacts would be expected as a result
of this land use change; and
The proposed amendments are in conformance with the General Plan
and Development Code due to the site's capacity to promote the
goals and objectives for community commercial development.
This item has been advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley
Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property has been posted, and notices were
sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the project site.
i~ION
If the City Council concurs with the Planning Con~mission's
recommendations, staff analysis as contained in the attached Planning
Commission report, and believes the proposed land use is acceptable, it
would be appropriate for the City Council to approve General Plan
Amendment 94-01A and authorize issuance of a Negative Declaration by the
adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval- Also, a .companion
rezoning application, Terra Vista Comunity Plan Amendment 94-01, is
currently under review by the Planning Commission and has been continued
to June 22, 1994. The Commission is still working with the applicant on
design issues of the Community Plan related to the anticipated
commercial center for the site. If the City Council approves General
Plan Amendment 94-01A, it would be appropriate to also enact the
Community Plan Amendment when it is forwarded by the Planning Co~nission
for approval-
118
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
GPA 94-01A - WESTERN LAND PROPERTIES
June 15, 1994
Page 3
ie/Respect ully submitted,
BB:AW:mlg
Attachments:
Exhibit "A" - Planning Commission Staff Report dated
May 11, 1994
Exhibit "B" - Planning Commission Minutes dated
May 11, 1994
Resolution of Approval
119
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
May 11, 1994
Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
STAFF REPORT
Brad Bullet, City Planner
Alan Warren, Associate Planner
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 94-01A -
WESTERN LAND PROPERTIES - A proposal to amend the General Plan Land
Use Element Map to change the land use designation from Office to
Community Commercial for 25 acres bounded by Foothill Boulevard on
the south, Spruce Avenue on the west, Church Street on the north,
and Elm Avenue on the east - APN: 1077-421-58 and 63. Related
File: Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment 94-01.
PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:
Surrounding Land Use and Zoning:
North - Terra Vista Planned Community (TVPC) Medium Residential (4-14
dwelling units per acre) and Parks; vacant and planned La
Mission Park site
South - Industrial Area Specific Plan, Subarea 7; vacant and hotel
East - TVPC; Mixed-Use Financial, Restaurants, Residential; vacant
West - TVPC Commercial and High Residential (24-30 dwelling units per
acre); Terra Vista Town Center and vacant
General Plan Designations:
Project Site - Office/Park
North - High Residential (24-30 dwelling units per acre) and Medium-High
Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre)
South - Industrial Park
East - Office and Commercial
West - Office and Community Commercial
Site Characteristics: The site is vacant but was used as a vineyard in
the past. The ground slopes 3 percent from north to south with a large
portion of this grade change occurring at the north end of the property
adjacent to Church Street. There is no mature vegetation on the property
nor any existing structures. The surrounding streets are improved with
the exception of Elm Street to the east. The view corridors are the
mountains on the north and the valley as it spreads out to the south,
east, and west.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Staff has reviewed the Initial Study, Part I, and
completed the Environmental Checklist, Part II of the Initial Study, and has
found no significant adverse environmental impacts to occur as a result of the
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
GPA 94-01A - WESTERN LAND PROPERTIES
May 11, 1994
Page 2
proposed General Plan Amendment and accompanying Community Plan Amendment.
Potential impacts, determined not to be significant, include the following:
Air Quality: The change in land use is expected to increase the air
emissions (from vehicle trips) due to development of the site for retail
commercial purposes above that expected from an office project. Staff
completed an air emissions inventory comparing anticipated development
under both land use scenarios and found that the increased Missions are
below the threshold levels for significance as recommended by the South
Coast Air Quality Management District.
Traffic: The Engineering staff has noted potential access and interior
circulation issues related to the proposed shopping center design. The
peak traffic periods will shift from office to retail commercial
character. The proposed land use change will present some design
challenges given the four existing street frontages which make the site
more conducive to a free standing office building complex which can
utilize multiple driveway locations to distribute the parking demand. The
typical shopping center, with parking concentrated on one side, will
reduce the effectiveness of the driveways on at least one frontage
(rear). Future project design submittals should be required to analyze
traffic for local circulation to assure that demands on the surrounding
frontages, Spruce Avenue in particular, will not exceed what would have
occurred with an office park use. Site designs should make optimum use of
the existing signalized entry at the intersection of Spruce Avenue and
Town Center Drive. These concerns, while technical in nature, are
inherent to the predominate design issues with shopping centers. The
potential impacts could be considered significant, but should and can be
resolved at the Design Review level.
LAND USE ANALYSIS:
Appropriateness of the existing designation: The development along
Foothill Boulevard in this area has been a combination of retail
commercial on the north side and office on the south side with one hotel
and specialty restaurant. The existing office designation is compatible
with the surrounding uses and designations, and is in compliance with the
community plan zoning of Office Park.
Need and appropriateness of retail commercial uses in the area and with
the specific site: With the surrounding office, retail, and related
commercial uses, the proposed land use is not out of character within the
general area. The proposed project is within the criteria established in
the General Plan which specifies the amount of gross. leasable area within
a community commercial site as 100,000 to 300,000 square feet (200,000+
square feet proposed). The anticipated uses at this location are in
conformity with those listed in the Community Commercial provisions.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
GPA 94-01A - WESTERN LAND PROPERTIES
May 11, 1994
Page 3
The issues which may be of concern are 1 ) need for additional retail
commercial land in the area and City, and 2 ) the suitability of the
specific site for retail commercial activity · In response to staff ' s
inquiry on these issues, the applicant provided a market and economic
study, "Market Support for New Retail Space and Commercially Zoned Acreage
Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 1 ifo rnia, November 1993" and Addendum, March 1994 ·
This report concluded "that the area's understoring in the uses targeted"
for this site "as well as the excellent locational positioning vis-a-vis
the more developed portions of Rancho Cucamonga and the 1-15 interchange
as especially strong arguments for rezoning." The report ' s "analysis
indicates that considerable retail demand will also remain available to
other key commercial developments in this immediate vicinity." These
conclusions are largely based on analysis which depended significantly on
current aggregate sales leakage size and substantial expected population
growth by the year 2000-
An independent review of the above-referenced report, "Terra Vista
Community Plan - Proposed Rezone of Spruce/Foothill Parcel" was completed
by a City selected consultant (funded by the applicant)- Some of the
significant points raised in the review of the report include:
Overly optimistic assumptions of future populations in the target
market areas in justification for increased retail commercial
acreage .
Overly optimistic anticipated levels of spending as a percentage of
per capita income for the target market areas in justification for
increased retail commercial acreage.
Operations of new large retailers, while generation and retaining
significant sales in the community, have "brought about loss of
business at certain other local retail outlets-"
~The City does continue to suffer from net sales exports which can be
reduced in selected merchandise lines such as home furnishings and
appliances, electronic equipment, quality restaurants, and specialty
groups (toys, book, sporting goods, music). The consultant's belief
that valid rational exists for additional retail commercial sites
along Foothill Boulevard is based on an assessment of current
economic development needs in these merchandise lines-
Locationally, staff concurs with the applicant that the site is well
suited for the intended uses. The conclusions provided from the review of
the applicant's market analysis identifying specific merchandise needs in
the community combined with the site's suitability with the immediate area
does make a viable case for the amendment. The suggestion from the City's
consultant for a commitment to development of certain retail uses is not
immediately available, as land use approvals cannot be conditioned. Only
the enactment of a development agreement between the land owner and the
City can limit the wide range of uses authorized in a land use
designation.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
GPA 94-01A - WESTERN LAND PROPERTIES
May 11, 1994
Page 4
C. Conformance with the General Plan and Co~nunity Plan: The existing office
designation is in compliance with the Community Plan zoning of Office
Park. If the Commission recommends amending the designation to the
requested Community Commercial, then it would be appropriate for the
Commission to also favorably consider amending the Con~nunity Plan
designation (Tetra Vista Community Plan Amendment 94-01) to the same
designation, Community Commercial. The Community Plan application, which
the Commission will be reviewing later in this meeting, contains policy
amendments which will make the proposed land use internally consistent
with the development standards of the plan.
FACTS FOR FINDINGS: Based on the facts and conclusions listed above, staff
believes the Planning Commission can make the following findings regarding
this application:
A. The property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed land use
and development district designation in terms of access and size as
evidenced by the site's location on the City's primary commercial arterial
and is immediately adjacent to existing major con~nunity commercial
development.
B. The proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the
environment nor the surrounding properties as evidenced by the conclusions
and findings of the Initial Environmental Study which indicated that no
significant impacts would be expected as a result of this land use change.
C. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan and
Development Code due to the site's capacity to promote the goals and
objectives for community commercial development.
CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in the
Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property has been posted, and
notices were sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the project site.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recon~nends that the Planning Con~nission adopt the
attached Resolution, thereby recomending that the City Council issue a
Negative Declaration and approve General Plan Amendment No. 94-01A.
~~a n ~er r s~
BB:AW:mlg
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - General Plan Land Use Map
Exhibit "B" - Community Plan Land Use Map
Resolution of Approval
:,.::
II
I,J IJ U JJ, l~JJ.JJJJll
!H!!! ~-LLU!I
LOW 2-4 DU's/AC
LOW-MEDIUM 4-BDU's/AC
MEDIUM 8-14 DU's/AC
MEDIUM-HIGH 14-24 DU's/AC
HIGH 24-30 DU's/AC
COMMERCIAL
COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL
NEIGHBORHOOD COMM.
REGIONAL COMMERCIAL
OFFICE
CElT
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
PLANNING DIVISION
r"////~
ITEM: GPA 94-01A and TVCPA 94--01
TITLE: General Plan Land Use Map
EXHIBIT: "A" SCALE:
INDUSTRIAL PARK
GENERAL INDUSTRIAL
N ==
.I
LM
NC
J J I f~ '
.....................
LM
:~UBLIC & QUASI-I:qJBLI(
OP MH i
i
CC
CC
· ' MOC
u~ OP i MFC ~ MHO ,,., ~cnEs of im
L,~ iS ACRES Of H I.I ACRES OF M
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
PL/~,TNING DIVISION
GPA 94-01A
Office to Community Commefciad
ITEM: GPA 94-01A and TVCPA 94-01
TITLE: Community Plan Land Use Map
EXHIBIT: "B" SCALE:
RESOLUTION NO. 94-37
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 94-01A REQUESTING TO AMEND THE
GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM OFFICE TO COMMUNITY
COMMERCIAL FOR 25 ACRES OF LAND BOUNDED BY FOOTHILL
BOULEVARD ON THE SOUTH, SPRUCE AVENUE ON THE WEST, CHURCH
STREET ON THE NORTH, AND ELM STREET ON AND EAST, AND
MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1077-421-58
AND 63.
A. Recitals.
1. Western Land Properties has filed an application for General Plan
Amendment No. 94-01A as described in the title of this Resolution.
Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred
to as "the application."
2. On May 11, 1994, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts
set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced public hearing on May 11, 1994, including written
and oral ~taff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby
specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to approximately 25 acres of land,
basically a rectilinear configuration, located on the north side of Foothill
Boulevard between Spruce Avenue and future Elm Avenue and is presently
vacant. Said property is currently designated as Office; and
b. The property to the north of the subject site is designated
High (24-30 dwelling units per acre) and Medium-High (14-24 dwelling units per
acre) and is vacant with a portion planned for park development. The property
to the west is designated Office and Community Commercial and is developed
with a community shopping center. The property to the east is designated
office and commercial and is vacant. The property to the south is designated
Industrial Park and is developed with a hotel and major portions is vacant.
PLANNING COMMISSION f DLUTiON NO.
GPA 94-01A - WESTERN ~ND PROPERTIES
May 11, 1994
Page 2
c. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies
of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a
manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and
d. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the
Land Use Element; and
e. This amendment would not be materially injurious or
detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact
on the environment nor the surrounding properties.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of
facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and
concludes as follows:
a. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted
in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with
existing land use in the surrounding area; and
b. That the proposed amendment would not have significant
impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and
c. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the
General Plan.
4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed
Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for
the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission
finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a
significant effect upon the environment and recommends adoption of a Negative
Declaration based upon the finding as follows:
a. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance
with the ~California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the
State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Negative Declaration
and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of
the Planning Commission; and, further, this Commission has reviewed and
considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard
to the application.
b. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of
the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as
follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative
Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project
will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the
habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon substantial evidence
contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the
information provided to the Planning Commission during the public hearing, the
Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set
forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of
Regulations.
PLANNING COMMISSION OLUTiON NO.
GPA 94-01A - WESTERN ~AND PROPERTIES
May 11, 1994
Page 3
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in
paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of
General Plan Amendment No. 94-01A.
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of
this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS llTH DAY OF MAY 1994.
PL~NNI O S OF THE CIT'.~' F RANCMO CUCAMONGA
BY:
ATTEST:
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the llth day of May 1994, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES:
COMMISSIONERS: BARKER, LUMPP, MELCHER, TOLSTOY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT:
COMMISSIONERS: MCNIEL
Chairman Barker observed that the vote had already been taken and the project
had been approved. Me asked Mr. Tohey if he had contacted staff regarding a
separate application for his wall so that the Commission could consider th
matter.
Mr. Tohey replied he had not.
Chairman Barker responded he should talk to staff.
would be 6 feet h~'gh on the Ort~z s~de but only 4 feet hi
Mr. Tohey stated the common wall is on the property line. said the wall
Commissioner Lumpp noted staff had been informed th an agreement had been
reached between the two neighbors. He observed ' had been suggested that
block be placed between the pilasters.
Mr. Tohey said that would be fine. ·
Chairman Barker said he would n need to return to the Commission unless
there is a change.
Mr. Buller said staff w need to review the plans for the wall.
Chairman Barker ted that Mr. Murphy would tell Mr. Tohey how to proceed
with a vari e on his own property, process building permits per his
agreement h the Ortizes, or appeal this decision if he should chose to do
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Be
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 94-01A - WESTERN LAND
PROPERTIES - A proposal to amend the General Plan Land Use Element Map to
change the land use designation from Office to Community Commercial for 25
acres bounded by Foothill Boulevard on the south, Spruce Avenue on the
west, Church Street on the north, and Elm Avenue on the east -
APN: 1077-421-58 and 63. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative
Declaration. Related file: Tetra Vista Community Plan Amendment 94-01.
Ce
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 94-01 -
WESTERN LAND PROPERTIES - A request to amend the land use designation for
a 25 acre piece of vacant land from Office Professional District to
Community Commercial District bounded by Foothill Boulevard on the south,
Spruce Avenue on the west, Church Street on the north, and Elm Avenue on
the east - APN: 1077-421-58 and 63. Staff recommends issuance of a
Negative Declaration. Related file: General Plan Amendment 94-01A.
Alan Warren, Associate Planner, presented the staff report regarding General
Plan Amendment 94-01A.
Planning Commission Minutes
-2- May 11, 1994
Commissioner Tolstoy noted the area immediately to the north of the project
site is designated as Medium Residential with High Residential to the west of
the Medium. He asked if there had been any consideration regarding changing
the Medium Residential and whether Medium would be appropriate adjacent to
Community Commercial.
Mr. Warren replied there had been no consideration of changing the designation
to High Residential. He thought the development standards should be able to
accommodate any negative impacts and noted that if the adjacent property were
changed to High Residential, that would mean that more people could be
impacted.
Brad Buller, City Planner, stated that when the original General Plan was laid
out, the buffer appeared to be in land use stages from Commercial to Office to
Residential. He noted that since that time, a majority the street frontage of
the northern property has been changed to a Park designation. He said that it
is not unusual to have Residential adjacent to Commercial.
Commissioner Tolstoy noted concerns have previously been voiced regarding
Neighborhood Commercial being adjacent to Residential.
Mr. Buller remarked that generally those concerns deal with Low Residential
single-family developments rather than Medium Residential projects.
Commissioner Lumpp asked if the applicant had prepared air quality and traffic
analyses.
Mr. Warren replied that the applicant had provided a detailed project analysis
and prepared the Initial Study and staff completed an air emissions inventory
utilizing the California Environmental Quality Act handbook. He noted that
all emissions were determined to be under the permitted increased emission
amounts.
Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer, commented that traffic analy~ ~ are based on
peak hour trip generation figures. He stated staff ha compared the
Commercial uses to the previously designated Office and Professional uses. He
said office uses tend to have concentrated peak hours of opening and closing
whereas a Commercial use generally opens in the morning and generates trips
throughout the day until closing in the evening.
Commissioner Lumpp asked if additional traffic studies would be requested when
the individual projects are submitted.
Mr. James replied additional traffic analysis would be required regarding
internal circulation and local access from Spruce, Church, and Elm Avenues
because an office park would typically have an office in the center with
parking evenly distributed around the center and access being more evenly
distributed onto the surrounding streets whereas there would be limited access
from Spruce because of limited parking available in the rear of a commercial
center.
Planning Commission Minutes
-3- May 11, 1994
130
Commissioner Lumpp asked if a more detailed analysis and modeling would be
required when the applicant submits a specific project.
Mr. James replied more detailed analysis would be required but no modeling
would be required because there are no regional concerns. He said the
applicant had already met with the traffic engineer to determine what would be
required. He said there may be concerns regarding stacking on Spruce Avenue
at Town Center.
Commissioner Lumpp asked if an action on the General Plan Amendment would mean
the Commission was also taking action on the marketing analysis.
Mr. Bullet replied that the analysis was provided only as background material.
Commissioner Lumpp recalled that when Urban Research Associates prepared a
marketing study for the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, they reported there
was no need for any additional Commercial. He noted that the applicant's
study indicated there is a demand for more Commercial and the City's
consultant appeared to agree that more Commercial would be appropriate. He
asked what had changed since the initial report.
Mr. Warren replied that when the initial study for the Foothill Boulevard
Specific Plan was completed, the City was just starting to see a great
increase in residential build out and the comparison was to other cities in
Southern California. He said that the second study took into account the
tremendous residential growth which had taken place, not only in Rancho
Cucamonga but also in surrounding cities, and concluded that additional
Commercial could be supported.
Mr. Buller stated the market study provided by the applicant indicated there
is a market for specific types and sizes of users that is missing in Rancho
Cucamonga. He said the applicant is trying to focus on those needs.
Commissioner Lumpp said he was glad to see that Mr. Young had modified his
thinking on the need for additional Commercial.
Nancy Fong, Senior Planner, presented the staff report regarding Terra Vista
Community Plan Amendment 94-01.
Commissioner Lumpp questioned if the City should designate the width for the
landscaped area bisecting the site. He felt "wide" was too ambiguous.
Ms. Fong replied that staff felt that should be determined when a specific
project is submitted.
Chairman Barker opened the public hearing.
Gary Luque, Western Land Properties, 1156 North Mountain Avenue, Upland,
stated their original intent had been to submit the conditional use permit
application in time to have a workshop with the Commission before the hearings
on the general plan and industrial specific plan amendments. However, he said
there had been significant changes to the project and they hoped to have a
Planning Commission Minutes
-4- May 11, 1994
131
workshop as soon as possible. Mr. Luque said that when the project was first
approved as Office/Professional, 600,000 square feet of office buildings had
been planned from two to six stories high. He stated that the northwest
corner of the project is below the street grade and he said there will be
significant landscaping to mitigate the effects to the residential property
across the street. He said they had been approached by specific users to
build the buildings they now propose so they feel the project is viable.
Rick Mager, Western Land Properties, 1156 North Mountain Avenue, Upland,
stated they had developed Terra Vista Town Center in several phases over many
years with approximately 503,000 square feet completed to date. He said the
the pad buildings currently under construction are leased and there is a
vacancy factor of only 5 percent in the entire project. He stated that the
smaller stores are less desirable than larger shops in today's economy. He
said they were requesting the rezoning in order to reinforce the market share
of Terra Vista Town Center. He felt it would augment the center and make it a
stronger commercial complex. He presented a letter of intent from Best Buy
Electronics for a 58,500 square foot store which they wanted to open on
November 11, 1994, in conjunction with other stores in California. He stated
that they propose building approximately 225,000 square feet in phases with
the first phase of approximately 100,000 square feet to be completed and open
by March 1995. He said they had received commitments for all but 6,000 square
feet of the first phase. He felt the new project would generate an additional
$50 to $60 million in sales per year. He stated that Project Manager David
Newsome, Senior Marketing Manager Paula Dempsey, and Paul Vogel, President of
Realty Development Research, were available to answer questions.
Commissioner Melcher noted Mr. Mager had said he hoped to reach about $100
million in sales at Town Center with the 503,000 square feet. He asked how
the new center of 225,000 square feet could then be expected to do between $50
to $60 million.
Mr. Mager said that Best Buy currently does approximately $20 million in each
store that they operate with the average store size less than 45,000 square
feet. He said this new store will be approximately 60,000 square feet and
should generate approximately $30 million in its first year of operation.
Paul Vogel, President of Realty Development Research, Inc. 542 South Dearborn
Street, Chicago, Illinois, stated they had prepared a study in 1990 which they
updated in November 1993 and March 1994. He presented a company brochure and
a memorandum which briefly reviewed the analysis prepared by the City's
consultant. Mr. Vogel stated that even when using the lower numbers generated
by the City's consultant, there is still a current deficiency of 400,000
square feet of Commercial space in the City.
Commissioner Melcher noted that the City's consultant concluded that the
additional Commercial space should be devoted to a limited number of types of
retailers. He asked if Mr. Vogel agreed with that premise.
Mr. Vogel did not agree, but felt there is a need in the total department
store type merchandise area.
Planning Commission Minutes
-5- May 11, 1994
132
Hearing no further testimony, Chairman Barker closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Melcher noted that the original design concept for the corporate
park was to have open landscaped areas within the site providing a view into
the community. He noted that Church Street is a major thoroughfare and would
now likely look onto a more solid back side of a commercial center. He
preferred to have the topic addressed at the Commission level before acting
upon the community plan amendment. He did not object to the use and favored
proceeding with the General Plan change.
Commissioner Tolstoy felt the change makes sense but he noted that the City
has a number of small businesses in the community that are hurting and he
feared adding more Commercial space of larger users would hurt the small
businesses even more. He also noted that the Masi project also added
Commercial uses along Foothill Boulevard and the City seems to be doing
patchwork planning rather than following the plan the City has in place. He
thought the Commission should take a good look at the additional Commercial
property still available to be developed and the rest of the designations
along Foothill Boulevard to determine what other uses might be appropriate.
He thought this particular application makes sense but he wished the City
could tell the developer to trade this additional Commercial for another site
already designated as Commercial so that new Commercial property would not be
added.
Commissioner Lumpp felt the general plan amendment is appropriate based on
staff's analysis. He agreed with Commissioner Tolstoy that areas in the
community are suffering but he was not sure that prohibiting a project such as
this would help. He thought users will relocate more readily in today's
economy leaving older centers with less business. He felt the design
standards section of the community plan amendment should be further reviewed
before approval. He particularly felt that "wide" landscape area should be
better defined.
Chairman Barker felt the public votes with their purchasing power and the
small shops are a victim of the way people shop. He thought that people shop
where it meets their needs, whether it be for cheaper goods or a wider
selection, and they will continue to shop where it meets their needs no matter
where that particular store may be. He said the City is now starting to have
a wider selection of stores. He did not think turning down this application
would save the smaller stores which are hurting. He supported the General
Plan amendment. He echoed Commissioner Melcher's concerns regarding the view
from Church Street as he felt it appears to be a giant alley behind the
project and he wished to see a little more detail before recommending approval
of the community plan amendment.
Motion: Moved by Lumpp, seconded by Melcher, to recommend issuance of a
negative declaration and adopt the resolution recommending approval of General
Plan Amendment 94-01A. Motion carried by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
BARKER, LUMPP, MELCHER, TOLSTOY
NONE
MCNIEL -carried
Planning Commission Minutes
-6- May 11, 1994
Mr. Buller stated that the applicant would like to fast track the project
because of their commitment to Best Buy. He suggested that the Commission
could take action on the concept but defer acceptance of the text regarding
streetscape design and how the project fronts onto Church Street.
Commissioner Melcher felt the Commission could cooperate with the applicant in
continuing to move towards the applicant's long range objectives as they work
through the project. He felt the community plan may have to reflect the
actual development more than predicted. He thought the comments that had been
offered tonight were in an effort to help to shape the project. He suggested
the community plan amendment and the project move forward together.
Chairman Barker agreed that he would prefer not to come up with language
before seeing what is proposed. He wanted to be sure his concerns could be
addressed. He again opened the public hearing.
Mr. Mager stated he had worked in the City for almost five years and he felt
their track record speaks for itself. He said they were committed to working
with the Commission as partners to satisfy its concerns relative to the
streetscape and other aspects of the project. He noted they have significant
time constraints with regards to the Best Buy. He suggested changing "wide"
to "significant," which he felt is a stronger word. He acknowledged that the
Commiseion's concerns were valid. He observed that the Commission will have
to approve every proposed building and he requested that the Commission move
forward with the community plan amendment.
Chairman Barker acknowledged that each building will have to be approved by
the Commission, but he felt uneasy with the sketch which is included as an
exhibit to the community plan.
Mr. Buller noted that since the Commission had taken action on the General
Plan Amendment, that portion could go forward to the City Council without
action on the community plan amendment.
Ms. Fong stated the applicant had only last week submitted new design plans
and she anticipated the project could not come before the Commission until the
second meeting in June.
Mr. Buller noted that the Community Plan Amendment would require City Council
approval whereas the Conditional Use Permit would not need to go to the City
Council unless appealed. He suggested the matter be continued for two weeks
to try to address the concerns regarding the exhibit and text.
Ms. Fong suggested a pre-application review of the project preceding the
design review of the actual project. She thought that would give an advance
look into the project design.
Commissioner Melcher thought the City and developer have enjoyed a long
relationship in development of the project. He felt the developer could
proceed on the development plan and act on good faith that the City would
approve the plan when the Commission's concerns are satisfied. He noted the
applicant could be in plan check with the working drawings before the City
Council finalizes the change to the community plan.
Planning Commission Minutes
-7- May 11, 1994
Mr. Bullet said that would be correct with the consent of the Building
Official. He suggested the matter be continued for two weeks to allow staff
and the applicant to work on addressing the concerns.
Mr. Luque felt the actual project and the community plan are tied together and
he supported the pre-application workshop suggestion.
Chairman Barker asked if the Commission could have the pre-application review
prior to the next Planning Commission meeting.
Mr. Buller felt that could be accomplished.
Commissioner Melcher felt that could be a workable solution because he thought
a pre-application review may result in the development of sufficient changes
to the community plan.
Chairman Barker noted that the hearing was still open.
Motion: Moved by Lumpp, seconded by Melcher, to continue Environmental
Assessment and Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment 94-01. Motion carried by
the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
BARKER, LUMPP, MELCHER, TOLSTOY
NONE
MCNIEL -carried
D. V~-.'ANCE 93-05 - OAS PARTNERSHIP - A request to increase the sign area for
the ~- .~ect Identification Monument Sign from 24 to 49 square feet;
increase ..... _~e sign area for the Tenant Identification Monument Signs from
24 to 49 squ-..-.e feet; and increase the maximum number of tenant names on
the Tenant Ideh~_' fication Monument Signs from three to five per face, for
Thomas Winery Pla~u;._ located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard
and Vineyard Avenues---._~ APN: 208-101-22 through 25. Related File:
Amendment to Uniform Sign' jogram No. 88.
OLD BUSINESS
E. AMENDMENT TO UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM NO. '~2 - OAS PARTNERSHIP - A request to
amend the Sign Program to allow a Proje~TM --. Identification Monument Sign,
internally illuminated Tenant Identification~_'.'.onument Signs, and various
changes to the sign criteria for Thomas Win~- · Plaza, located at the
northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and----__ .Vineyard Avenue -
APN: 208-101-22 through 25. Related file: Variance '.-?-05.
Chairman Barker noted that staff was requesting a continuan~ _ to May 25,
1994. He opened the public hearing. There were no comments.
Commissioner Melcher noted that the staff report had not yet been hea~.'. and
should be heard when the item is returned.
Planning Commission Minutes
-8- May 11, 1994
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
94-01A TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM OFFICE
TO COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL FOR 25 ACRES OF LAND BOUNDED BY
FOOTH ILL BOULEVARD ON THE SOUTH, SPRUCE AVENUE ON THE
WEST, CHURCH STREET ON THE NORTH, AND ELM STREET ON THE
EAST, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN:
1077-421-58 AND 63.
A. Recitals-
1. On April 6, 1981, the City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga approved the enactment of the General Plan by adoption of Resolution
No. 81-40.
2. Western Land Properties has filed an application for General Plan
Amendment No. 94-01A as described in the title of this Resolution.
Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred
to as "the application."
3. On May 11, 1994, the Planning Co~nission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and
following the conclusion of said public hearing, adopted Resolution No. 94-37
recommending to the City Council that said application be approved and a
Negative Declaration be issued.
4. On June 15, 1994, the City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga held a duly noticed public hearing and concluded said public hearing
prior to its adoption of this Resolution.
5. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the
City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set
forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during
the above-referenced public hearing on May 11, 1994, including Planning
Commission minutes, written and oral staff reports, together with public
testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to approximately 25 acres of land,
basically a rectilinear configuration, located on the north side of Foothill
Boulevard between Spruce Avenue and future Elm Avenue and is presently
vacant. Said property is currently designated as Office; and
136
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
GPA 94-01A - WESTERN LAND PROPERTIES
June 15, 1994
Page 2
b. The property to the north of the subject site is designated
High (24-30 dwelling. units per acre) and Medium-High (14-24 dwelling units per
acre) and is vacant with a portion planned for park development. The property
to the west is designated Office and Community Commercial, and is developed
with a community shopping center. The property to the east is designated
Office and Commercial, and is vacant. The property to the south is designated
Industrial Park and is developed with a hotel and major portions are vacant.
c. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies
of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a
manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and
d. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the
Land Use Element; and
e. This amendment would not be materially injurious or
detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact
on the environment nor the surrounding properties.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council
during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of
facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and
concludes as follows:
a. The subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in
the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with
existing land use in the surrounding area; and
b. The proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on
the environment nor the surrounding properties; and
c. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General
Plan.
4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed
Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for
the environmental assessment for the application, the City Council finds that
there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant
effect upon the environment and recommends adoption of a Negative Declaration
based upon the findings as follows:
a. The Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with
the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State
CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the
Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the City
Council; and, further, this Council has reviewed and considered the
information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the
application.
137
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
GPA 94-01A - WESTERN LAND PROPERTIES
June 15, 1994
Page 3
b. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of
the California Code of Regulations, the City Council finds as follows: In
considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative Declaration
for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have
potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon
which wildlife depends. Further, based upon substantial evidence contained in
the Negative Declaration, the staff reports, and exhibits, and the information
provided to the City Council during the public hearing, the City Council
hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section
753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations-
5- Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in
paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Council hereby approves General Plan
Amendment No. 94-01A, amending the General Plan Land Use Map from Office to
Community Commercial for 25 acres of land bounded by Foothill Boulevard on the
south, Spruce Avenue on the west, Church Street on the north, and Elm Street
on the east.
6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
June 15, 1994
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF MATrERS
FOR THE NOVEMBER 8, 1994 ELECTION
Attached you will find Resolutions relatli~g to the November 8, 1994 election. It is recommended that
the Council adopt the following Resolutions:
Calling for the Municipal Election to be held November 8, 1994, for the positions of
Mayor and two City Coundl seats, and to consolidate said election with the County of
San Bernardino. 0 c/-
Approving the regulations for candidates running for elective office.
Also for your consideration is a Resolution to place an initiative on the ballot asking the voters
whether the office of City Clerk shall be appointive. It is staff's recommendation that the City Clerk
be an appointed position for the following reasons:
· / There will be a cost savings to the taxpayers if the City Clerk's position is not placed
on the ballot every four years. ~.~
· .Q The City Clerk's position requires technical skills to run the office, .i~., knowledge of
state laws, experience conducting elections, expertise with records management, and the
ability to maintain a legislative history program for all City Council actions.
· _~ It will promote efficiency and further reduce government cost by allowing the functions
of City Clerk to be performed by trained personnel.
Should the Council approve the ResolutionAo place this matter as an initiative on the ballot, the
following are OPTIONAl. Resolutions for the Council's consideration. You may approve or take no
action on any of the Resolutions listed below:
1. Authorizing certain members to file a written argument regarding a City measure. ~/c.'
2. Directing the City Attorney to prepare an impartial analysis.
3. Providing for the filing of rebuttal arguments for City Measure.
~,~'~ter the Council considers all of the above items, I will proceed with the San Bernardino County
; ~I; ~ Registrar's Office to place these matters on the November 8 ballot.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 989-1851, Ext. 2005.
/dja
Attachments
139
A RESOLUTION OF THE C/TY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANC~O
~, C. AT.TFORNIA, CAT.I.TNG AND GIVING NOTICE OF
G~AL MUNICIPAL ~.FCTION TO BE H~n IN SAID CITY ON
TUESDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF ~ER, 1994, FOR THE k~.RCTION
OF CERTAIN OFFICERS OF THE CITY AS REQUIR[D BY THE
PROV/SIONS OF THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
K~.RCTION WITH STATEWIDE G~NERAL ~.~F/ON TO BE H~VD ON
WHEREAS, under the provisions of the laws relating to General Law
Cities in the State of California, a general municipal election shall be held
on Tuesday, November 8, 1994, for the election of Municipal Officers.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does
hereby resolve, declare, determine and order as follows:
SECT/ON 1: That pursuant to the requirements of the laws of the
State of California relating to General Law Cities within said State, there
shall be, and there is hereby called and ordered, held in the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, on Tuesday, the 8th
day of November, 1994 a General Municipal Election of the qualified electors
of said City for the purpose of electing a Mayor of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga for full term of two years; two members of the City Council for the
full term of four years; a City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga for a
full term of four years; and a City Treasurer of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
for a full term of four years.
SBLTION 2: Tnat the General Municipal Election hereby called for the
date hereinbefore specified shall be and is hereby ordered consolidated with
the Statewide General Election to be held on said date within the City. Tne
proceedings, polling places, precincts, precinct board members and officers
for the General Municipal Election hereby called shall be the same as those
provided for said Statewide General Election. The Board of Supervisors of San
Bernard/no County is hereby requested to order the consolidation of the
General Municipal Election hereby called with said Statewide General Election,
and said Registrar of Voters is hereby authorized to canvass the returns of
said General Municipal Election and said election shall be held in all
respects as if there were only one election and one formal ballot, namely the
ballot used at said General Election shall be used. Said Registrar of Voters
shall supervise the canvass of said returns for said Special Municipal
Election and transmit said returns to the City Council of said City which
shall thereafter declare the results thereof.
SECTION 3: The City of Rancho Cucamonga shall reimburse said County
for services performed when the work is completed and upon presentation to the
City of a properly approved bill.
SECTION 4: The City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is
directed to forward, without delay, to said Board of Supervisors and to said
Registrar of Voters each a certified copy of this Resolution.
140
A RESOU3TION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ~
~, (RLIFC~qA, ADOPTING A CE~GE TO CANDIDATES
FOR N~.~LT/VE OFFICE, Fr~R PREPARAT/C~ OF MATBRIALg
TO BEI-rm'n IN THECITYQNIUESI]AY, ~8, 1994
WHEREAS, Section 10012 of the Elections Code of the State of
California provides that tba governing body of any city may adopt a charge
against candidates pertaining to materials prepared by any candidate for a
municipal election, including costs of the candidates statement.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho O~amonga does
hereby resolve, declare, determine and order as follows:
SECTION 1: General ~-ovisions. That pursuant to Section 10012 of
the Electicrs Code of the State of California, each candidate for elective
office to be voted for at the General MUnicipal Election to be bald in the
City of Pand~ ~ on November S, 1994, may prepare a candidate's
statememt on an a~4xR3kiate form provided by the City Clerk. Such statement
my include the name, age and occupation of the candidate and a brief descrip-
tion of no more than 200 words of the candidate,s education and qualifications
expressed by the candidate himself or herself. Such statement shall not
include party affiliation of the candidate, nor membership or activity in
partisan political organizations. Such statement shall be filed in the office
of the City Clerk at the time the candidate,s nomination papers are filed.
Such statement may be withdrawn, bat not changed, during the period for filing
nenination papers and until 5:00 p.m. of the next working day after the cloee
of the ncmination period.
SECT/ON 2: Spanish r~n~a~e. A candidate may elect to have said
candidate statement translated into Spanish at an additional cost to be
determined by the Registrar of Voters.
SECT/ON 3: Additional Materials. No candidate will be permitted to
include additional materials in the sample ballot package.
SECTION 4: Payment. The City Clerk shall estimate the total cost of
printing, handling, translating, and mailing the candidates statements filed
pursuant to the Electic~ls COde, including costs inoarred as a result of
ccm~lying with the Votin~ Rights Act of 1965 (as amended), and re~,~e each
candidate filing a statement to pay in advance his or her pro rata share as a
condition of having his or her start included in the voter's pamphlet.
The estimate is just an approximation of the actual cost that varies
election to another election and may be significantly more or less than the
estimate, depending on the actual number of candidates filing statement.
Accordingly, the clerk is not bound by the estimate and may, on a pro rata
basis, bill the candidate for additional actual expense or refund any exuess
paid depending on the final actual cost. In the event of underpay, the
clerk may require the candidate to pay the balance of the cost incurred. In
the event of overpayment, the clerk shall prorate the excess amount among the
candidates and refund the excess amount paid within 30 days of the election.
141
SECTION 5: That the City Clerk shall provide each candidate or the
candidate,s representative a copy of this Resolution at the time ncmtinatir~
petitions are issued.
SECTION 6: That all previous resolutions establishing council policy
on payment for candidates statements are repealed.
SECTION 7: That this Resolution shall apply only to the election to
be held on November 8, 1994, and shall then be repealed.
142
A RESOI/3I~ON OF THE CITY CEW3NCIL OF THE CITY OF RANG~0
~, CAT.TF(1RN/A, CATLTNG AND GIVING NOTICE OF I~E
HOLDING OF A SPECIAL MUNICIPAL ~.~CT/ON TO BE ~n~n IN THE
CITY ON TUESI]AY, THE RIGhit{ (STH) DAY OF NOVR4BER, 1994,
SUBMITTING A QUEST/ON TO THE Rr.wCTORS OF THE CITY OF
OFFICE OF CITY ~.~RK SHATI. BE APPOIMIIVE
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to subnit to the electors of the
City the question of whether the Office of City Clerk shall be appointive; ar~
WHEREAS, the suhnission of said question to the electors at a special
election bald for that pul13ose is authorized by Goverrz~er~ Code 36508.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho OacanrFr3a does
hereby resolve, declare, determine and order as follows:
SECT/ON 1: That [REsuant to the requirements of the laws of the
State of California relating to general law cities within said State, there
shall be, and there is hereby called and ordered to be held in the City of
Rancho Cucam3rr/a, County of San Bernardino, State of California, on TUesday,
the eighth (Sth) day of November, 1994, a special nunicipal election for the
purpose of subhitting the following question to the electors of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, California, to wit:
"Shall the office of City Clerk
be appointive?,,
SECT/ON 2: That the special municipal election hereby called for the
date bareir~hove specified shall be and is hereby ordered consolidated with
the statewide general election to be held on said date, and within said city
the precincts, polling places and officers of election for the special
municipal election hereby cited shall be the same as those provided for said
statewide general election. The Board of Supervisors of San Bernardino County
is hereby requested to order the consolidation of the special ~unicipal
election hereby called with said statewide general election, ara said Board of
Supervisors is hereby autbarized to canvass tba returns of said special
municipal election and said election shall be held in all respects as if there
were only one (1) election, and only one (1) form of ballot, namely, the
ballots used in said general election, shall be used. Said Board of
Supervisors shall certify the results of the canvass of the returns of said
special municipal election to the City Council of said city which shall
thereafter declare the results thereof.
SECTION 3: That the polls for said election shall be opemd at
7:00 A.M. on the day of said election and shall remain open contim/ously from
said time until 8:00 P.M. of the same day when said polls shall be closed,
except as provided in Section 14301 of the Elections Code of the State of
California.
SECT/ON 4: Tnat in all particulars not recited in this Resolution,
said elections shall be held and conducted as provided by law for holding
municipal elections in said city.
S~CTION 5: That notice of the time and place of holding said
election is hereby given and the City Clerk is hereby authorized, instructed
and directed to give such further or additional notice of said election in
time, form, and manner required by law.
SF2TION 6: That the Board of Supervisors is hereby requested to
issue instructions to the Registrar of Voters to take any and all steps
neoe~y for the holding of said consolidated election.
S~"F/CN 7: Tne City of Rancho Cucamonga recognizes that additional
costs will be ~ed by the County by reason of this consolidation and
agrees to reimburse the County for any such costs.
SI'ITION 8: That the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is
hereby directed to file a certified copy of this Resolution with the Board of
Supervisors and the Registrar of Voters of the County of San Bernardino.
144
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY ODUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
~, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING CERTAIN OF ITS M~MBERS
TO FTI?. A ~ ~ REGARDM A CITY MEASURE
WHEREAS, a special municipal election is to be held in the City of
Rancho Cucamonga on November 8, 1994 at which time there will be suhnitted to
the qualified electors of the City the following question:
"Shall the office of City Clerk be appointive?"
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Oacamonga does
hereby resolve, declare, determine and order as follc~s:
SECTION 1: Tnat this City Council, being the legislative body of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, authorizes:
members of that body, to file a written argument in favor of the City measure
set forth in the recitals hereof in accordance with Article 4, Chapter 3,
Division 5 of the Elections Code of the State of California and to change the
argument until and including the date fixed by the City Clerk after which no
arguments for or against the City measure may be suhnitted to the City Clerk.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OOUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANC~O
PREPARE AN IMPARIIAL ANALYSIS
WHEREAS, a special municipal election is to be held in the City of
Ranc/lo Cucamonga on November 8, 1994, at which there will be suknitted to the
qualified electors of the City the following question:
"Shall the office of City Clerk be appointive?"
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does
hereby resolve, declare, determine and order as follows:
S~CTION 1: That this City Council directs the City Clerk to transmit
a copy of the question to the City Attorney. The City Attorney shall prepare
an impartial analysis showing the effect of the questions on the existing law
and the operation of the ~measure. The impartial analysis shall be filed by
the date set by the City Clerk for the filing of primary arguments.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RAN(M0
CUCAMDNGA, CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING FOR THE Frr.TNG OF
REBUTTAL~FORCTTYMEASURES
WHEREAS, Section 5014.5 of the Elections Code of the State of
California authorizes the City Council, by majority vote, to adopt provisions
to provide for the filing of rebattal arguments for City measures suhnitted at
municipal elections.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does
hereby resolve, declare, determine and order as follows:
SECTION 1: That pursuant to Section 5014.5 of the Elections Code of
the State of California, if any person mahnits an argument against a City
measure, and an argument has been filed in favor of the City measure, the City
Clerk shall ~ately send copies of t_hat ~t to the persons filing the
argument in favor of the City measure. Tne persons filing the al~ in
favor of the City measure may prepare and subnit a rekuttal argument not
exceeding 300 words. Tne City Clerk shall send copies of the argument in
favor of the measure to the persons filing the ar~ment against the City
measure, who may prepare and subnit a rebuttal aru3unent to the arguraent in
favor of the City measure not exceeding 250 words. The rebuttal arguments
shall be filed with the City Clerk not more than 10 days after the final date
for filing direct arguments. Rebuttal arguments shall be printed in the same
manner as the direct arguments. Each rebuttal argument shall immediately
follow the direct argument which it seeks to rebut.
SECTION 2: That all previous resolutions providing for the filing of
rebuttal arguments for City _me~__-_~ures are repealed.
SECTION 3: That the provisions of Section 1 shall apply ~nly to the
election to be held on Tuesday, November 8, 1994, and shall then be repealed.
147
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
June 15, 1994
Mayor and Members of the City Council
The Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation Board of
Directors
Susan Mickey, Management Analyst I
CONSIDERATION OF A RECOMMENDATION BY THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION TO FILL VACANCIES ON ITS BOARD OF
DIRECTORS
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council approve the selection of Sue McNiel, Dianna
Lee-Mitchell and Andrew Hall to the Board of Directors of the
Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation.
BACKGROUND:
When the City Council originally formed the Rancho Cucamonga
Community Foundation in 1987, the intent was to have a seven (7)
member Board of Directors. With the resignation of Frances
Howdyshell, Jeanne Lochart and Paula Zadick, there are presently
three (3) vacancies on the Board.
ANALYSIS:
It was felt that all three candidates would bring a unique
combination of fundraising and organizational skills to the Board
of Directors. All three candidates have been active in the
community and have expressed a desire to donate their time to the
Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation. All three candidates have
the unanimous support of the Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation
Board of Directors.
Respectfully Submitted,
Susan Mickey
Management Analyst I
148
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
June 15, 1994
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA .
MEMORANDUM
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager ~~AR~~CT
AGENDA JUNE 15, 1994
O-12 FROM COUNCIL
Item D-12 - "Approval of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities and
Monumentation Cash Deposit for Tract 14121..." - The Developer, J.P. Rhoades
Development, is requesting this item be removed from the agenda and
rescheduled for the July 6, 1994 Council meeting.
WjO:dlw
J. P. RHOADES DEVELOPMENT
1801-C Perkcourt Place. 5anna Aria. CA
PO. Box 197,3.5a. nr~ Ana, CA e2702-tg7~
(714) g72,W44 FAX (714) ~7~-08e5
June 15, 1994
VIA FAX
909-987-6499
William J. O'Neil
Engineering Division
City of Rancho Cucamonga
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Re: Highland vineyards - Tract 14121
Dear Mr. O'Neil:
Please remove frcm council agenda our request for bond substitution
on our Tract ].4121, on the agenda for the 16th and reschedule for
July 6, 1994.
Should you have any questions please call me at 714-972-9944.
Sincerer/_/_/
~rey P. Rhoades
President
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MEMORANDUM
DATE: June 13, 1994
TO:
FROM:
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William J. Alexander, Councilmember
SUBJECT: ROUTE 66 VISITOR'S BUREAU BOARD OF DIRECTORS
With regards to the above subject item being on the agenda for the June 15 meeting
(Item I2), if the Council so desires, I will be happy to be the representative serving on
the Board of Directors for the Route 66 Visitor's Bureau.
I will be happy to discuss this with all of you at the June 15 meeting.
WJA/dja