The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1994/06/01 - Agenda PacketCITY COUNCIL AGENDA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REGULAR MEETINGS 1st and 3rd Wednesdays - 7:00 p.m. June 1, 1994 Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 City Councilmembers Denn~.~ L. Stout, Mayor Charles J. Buquet, Mayor Pro Tern William J. Alexander, Councilmember Rex Gutierrez, Councilmember Dine William s, Councilmember Jack Lain, C/ty Manager James L Markman, C/ty Attorney Dsbra J. Adams, City Cler/~ City Office: 989-1851 City Council Agenda June 1, 1994 All items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in writing. The deadline for submitting these items is 6:00 p.m. on the Tuesday prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's Office receives all such items. PAGE 1. Roll Call: Buquet A. CALL TO ORDFR , Alexander , Stout Williems. , and Gutierrez B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS Presentation of Proclamations to Gregory White Jr., Eric Wagner and Anita Arias for their assistance to the D.A.R.E. Program and for the example they set to children throughout the City. C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. D. CONSFNT CALFNDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Councilmember or member of the audience for discussion. Approval of Minutes: April 2'0, 1994 May 4, 1994 Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 5/11/94 and 5/18/94; and Payroll ending 5/5/94 and 5/19/94 for the total amount of $1366;162. 79. Alcoholic Beverage Application for Off-Sale General for Say-on Drugs, Lucky Stores Incorporated Delaware, 11428 Kenyon Way. City Council Agenda June 1, 1994 Approval of a Resolution approving Alternate Members for the Public Representatives of the Solid Waste Advisory Task Force. RESOLUTION NO. 94-100 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ALTERNATE MEMBERS FOR THE PUBLIC REPRESENTATIVES OF THE SOLID WASTE ADVISORY TASK FORCE Approval of Landmark Designation 94-01 - St. Clare of Assisi - An application to designate the Ernst Mueller House. located at 6563 East Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, as an Historic Landmark - AlaN: 227-071-17. RESOLUTION NO. 94-101 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION 94-01, THEREBY DESIGNATING THE ERNST MUELLER HOUSE, LOCATED AT 6563 EAST AVENUE, AS AN HISTORIC LANDMARK AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227-071 - 17 Approval to declare all monies remaining in the Improvement Fund for Assessment District NO. 89-1 (Milliken, south of Arrow) as Surplus. RESOLUTION NO. 94-102 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, MAKING DECLARATION REGARDING SURPLUS IN IMPROVEMENT FUND Approval of a resolution specifying conditions for the prepayment of special taxes within Community Facilities District 88-2. RESOLUTION NO. 94-103 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SPECIFYING CONDITIONS FOR THE PREPAYMENT OF SPECIAL TAXES WITHIN A COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT PAGE 2 l0 12 27 29 33 34 City Council Agenda June 1, 1994 PAGE 3 10. 11. 12. 13. Approval to release cash deposit and a Real Property Improvement Contract and Agreement for 8762 Vinmar Street, located south of 9th Street, east of Grove Avenue, submitted by Vincent Martinez. RESOLUTION NO. 94-104 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RELEASING A CASH DEPOSIT AND A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND AGREEMENT FROM 8762 VINMAR STREET Approval to execute a Joint Use Agreement (CO 94-039) with Rancho Cucamonga High School for Graduation Ceremonies at the Adult Sports Complex on June 16, 1994, and for City use of Rancho Cucamonga High School Gymnasium for Youth Basketball Program. Approval and authorization to execute a Common Use Agreement (CO 94-040] with San Bemardino County Flood Control District for Joint Use of Flood Control Distdct Land at the Rochester Avenue East Side Parkway from Victoria Park Lane to Highland Avenue. Approval to execute an Agreement (CO 94-041) between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and General Dynamics Corporation for right-of-entry for construction slope grading and construction of drainage facilities for the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Metrolink Station, Phase I. Approval to execute an Agreement (CO 94-042) between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Catellus Development Corporation for right-of-entry for grading and storm drain construction for the construction of the Milliken Avenue Project from Arrow Route to Foothill Boulevard. Approval to award and authorization for execution of a Professional Services Agreement (CO 94-043) to L.D. King for construction survey for the Milliken Avenue Extension Improvement Project, located between Arrow Highway and Foothill Boulevard for the amount of $38,90[].00, to be funded from Measure I (Arterial) Account No. 32-4637-9328. 36 37 38 43 45 47 City Council Agenda June 1, 1994 14. Approval to award and authorization to execute a contract (CO 94-044) for the Milliken Avenue Extension, between Arrow Route and Foothill Boulevard, and the Arrow Route Storm Drain Improvement Project to Riverside Construction for the amount of $1,551,867.90 ($~110,789.00 plus 10% contingency) to be funded from San Bernardino County Measure I (Arterial) Account No. 32- 4637-9328 and S.B. 140 Account No. 35-4637-9328. 15. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 13728, located on the northwest corner of Hillside Road and Sapphire Street. Release Maintenance Guarantee Bond Storm Drain Streets $ 7~:X:].C0 713:]:].C0 16. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Parcel Map 11472, located on the south side of 19th Street east of Hermosa Avenue. Release: Maintenance Guarantee Cash Deposit $ 1,1[]3.[]3 17. Approval to release a portion of funds deposited under Contract CO 90-139 for payment of Southern Pacific Railway Improvements at the Rochester Crossing, to the William Lyon Company. RESOLUTION NO. 94.- 105 a RESOLUTION OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CAUFORNIA, APPROVING THE RELEASE OF A PORTION OF FUNDS DEPOSITED BY THE WILLIAM LYON COMPANY FOR PAYMENT OF SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY IMPROVEMENTS AT THE ROCHESTER CROSSING 18. Approval to accept the Ninth Street Waterline Improvement Project, located from Vinmar to Sierra Madre Avenues, CO 94-003, as complete, retain Faithful Performance Bond and authorize the City Engineer to file a 'Notice of Completion* and approve the final contract amount of $22~57.40 PAGE 52 53 54 5E 57 City Council Agenda June 1, 1994 PAGE 19. RESOLUTION NO. 94-106 a RESOLUTION OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE NINTH STREET WATERLINE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, LOCATED FROM VINMAR TO SIERRA MADRE AVENUES, CONTRACT NO. CO 94(303, AND AUTHORI71NG THE RUNG OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION Approval to accept the Sapphire Street Storm Drain and Street Improvement, Banyan Street to Moon Court; Carnelian Street Access Ramps, Base Line Road to Nineteenth Street; and Base Line Road Improvements, east of Victoria Park Lane, CO 94-010, as complete. retain Faithful Performance Bond and authorize the City Engineer to file a 'Notice of Completion" and approve the final contract amount of $72,200.25. RESOLUTION NO. 94-. 107 a RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE SAPPHfRE STREET STORM DRAIN AND STREET IMPROVEMENT, BANYAN STREET TO MOON COURT; CARNELIAN STREET ACCESS RAMPS, BASE LINE ROAD TO NINETEENTH STREET; AND BASE LINE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS, EAST OF VICTORIA PARK LANE, CONTRACT NO. CO 94-010, AND AUTHORIZING THE RUNG OF A NOTICE OF COMPt. ET1ON 58 60 F. CONSFNT ORDINANCFS The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time of first reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be removed for discussion. No Items Submitted. City Council Agenda June 1, 1994 PAGE 6 e F. ADVFRTISFD PUBLIC HFARINGS The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT AND RESOLUTION FOR THE LEVY OF THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN THE STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1.2.3. 4. 5. 6. 7 AND 8 FOR FISCAL YEAR 1994/95 (No Increase of Assessment Rate is Proposed) RESOLUTION NO. 94-108 a RESOLUTION OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1,2, 3, 4.5, 6, 7 AND 8 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORTS AND RESOLUTION FOR THE LEVY OF THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN I ANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1.2.3A. 3B. 4.5. 6.7 AND 8 FOR FISCAL YEAR 1994195 (No Increase ot Assessment Rate is Proposed) RESOLUTION NO. 94-109 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2.3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6. 7 AND 8 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPE AND STREET UGHTING ACT OF 1972 CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT AND RESOLUTION FOR THE LEVY OF THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN THE PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PD- 85) FOR FISCAL YEAR 1994/95 (No Increase of Assessment Rate is Proposed) I~SOLUTION NO. 94.- 110 a RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAUFORNIA, TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN THE PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICTS NO. 85-PD (:HERITAGE AND RED HILL COMMUNITY PARKS) 61 65 113 119 175 178 City Council Agenda June 1, 1994 CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 78-03 - SAM 'S R ACE - A request to revoke the Conditional Use Permit for the operation of a bar in conjunction with a restaurant in the Neighborhood Commercial District. located at the nodhwest corner of 19th and Carnelian Streets - APN: 201-811-56 through 60. RESOLUTION NO. 94,- 111 a RESOLUTION OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REVOKING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 78-03 FOR THE OPERATION OF A BAR IN CONJUNCTION WITH A RESTAURANT, SAM'S PLACE, LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF 19TH AND CARNELIAN STREETS IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 20 1-811-56 THROUGH 60 CONSIDERATION OF ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT 91-02 - SAM'S R ACE - A request to revoke an Entertainment Permit for a bar and restaurant in the Neighborhood Commercial District, located at the northwest comer of 19th and Carnelian Streets - APN: 201-811- 56 through 60. RESOLUTION NO. 94-112 a RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REVOKING ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT NO. 91-02 FOR A BAR AND RESTAURANT, SAM'S PLACE, LOCATED AT HE NORTHWEST CORNER OF CARNELIAN AND 19TH STREETS IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 201-811-56 THI'~C)UGH 60 CONSIDERATION OF ENVIR(')NMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PI AN AMENDMENT 93-02A - GENERAL DYNAMICS - A proposed amendment to change the land use map from Industrial Park and General Industrial to Mixed Use and Open Space and other related amendments in conjunction with the Subarea 18 Specific Plan for 380 acres of land generally located north of 4th Street and west of Millikan Avenue - APN: 209-272-01,04, 07 and 08; 210~81-22 and 23; 210082-03, 11, 17, 37, 38, ard 39; and 210-361-01 through 26. PAGE 186 205 186 208 211 City Council Agenda June 1, 1994 PAGE 8 RESOLUTION NO. 94-113 a RESOLUTION OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA. APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 93-02A, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN TO ADD A NEW LAND USE CATEGORY OF 'MIXED USE,' TO AMEND THE LAND USE MAP FROM INDUSTRIAL PARK AND GENERAL INDUSTRIAL TO MIXED USE AND OPEN SPACE, AND OTHER RELATED AMENDMENTS IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE SUBAREA 18 SPECIFIC PLAN FOR 380 ACRES OF LAND BOUNDED ON THE SOUTH BY 41'!-I STREET, ON THE EAST BY MILLIKEN AVENUE, ON THE NORTH BY THE A.T.S.F. (METROLINK) RAILROAD, AND ON THE WEST BY CLEVELAND AVENUE AND UTICA AVENUE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - AI:>N: 209-272-01,134, 07.08; 2'10--081-22, 23; 210-082-02, 11, 17, 37 THROUGH 39; AND 210-361-01 THROUGH 26 CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PI AN AMENDMENT 93-03 - GENERAL DYNAMICS - A proposed amendment to create a new Subarea 18, bounded on the south by 4th Street, on the east by Millikan Avenue, on the north by the A.T. & S.F. (Metrolink) Railroad, and on the west by Cleveland Avenue and Utica Avenue, and other related amendments to provide consistency with the Subarea 18 Specific Plan - APN: 209-272-01.1::)4, 07. and 08; 210081-22 and 23; 210- 082-02, 11, 17, 37, 38 and 39; and 210-361-01 through ORDINANCE NO. 524 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGAo CAUFORNIA, APPROVING INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 93-03, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN TO ESTABLISH A SUBAREA 18, AND OTHER RELATED AMENDMENTS, IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE SUBAREA 18 SPECIFIC PLAN, FOR 380 ACRES OF LAND BOUNDED ON THE SOUTH BY 4TH STREET, ON THE EAST BY MILLIKEN AVENUE, ON THE NORTH BY THE A.T. & S.F. (METROLINK) RAILROAD, AND ON THE WEST BY CLEVELAND AND UTICA AVENUES, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 209-272-01,04, 07, AND 08; 210-081-22 AND 23; 210-082- 02, 11, 17, 37, 38, AND 39: AND 210-361-01 'II-tROUC~-t 26 235 211 250 City Council Agenda June 1, 1994 CONSIDERATION OF SPECIFIC Pl AN 93-01 - GENERAL DYNAMICS - A plan for the redevelopmerit of 380 acres of land that would include recreational, commercial, and retail facilities surrounding an 18- hole golf course, bounded on the south by 4th Street, on the east by Millikan Avenue, on the north by the A.T. & S.F. (Metrolink) Railroad, and on the west by Cleveland Avenue and Utica Avenue. ORDINANCE NO. 525 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CIIY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPIK)VING SPECIFIC PLAN 93-01, THE SUBAREA 18 SPECIFIC PLAN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT - GENERAL DYNAMICS - A public hearing on a Final EIR for the General Dynamics Rancho Cucamonga Subarea Specific Plan 93-01, General Ran Amendment 93-02A, Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 93-03, and Tentative Parcel Map 14647 for the redevelopmerit of 380 acres of land that would include recreational, commercial, and retail facilities surrounding an 18- hole golf course, bounded on the south by 4th Street, on the east by Milllken Avenue, on the north by the A.T. & S.F. (Metrolink) Railroad, and on the west by Cleveland Avenue and Utica Avenue. RESOLUTION NO. 94-. 114 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAUFORNIA, CERTIFYING THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE SUBAREA 18 SPECIFIC PLAN, AND ADOPTING THE STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS PAGE 287 333 287 337 PURl IC HFARINRS The following items have no legal requirements. The Chair will open public testimony. publication or posting the meeting to receive No Items Submitted. City Council Agenda June 1, 1994 PAGE 10 H. CITY MANAGFR'S STAFF RFPORTS The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. APPROVAL OF a RESOLUTION DECLARING SUPPORT FOR THE ETIWANDA HISTORICAL SOCIETY AND THEfR APPLICATION FOR FUNDING FROM THE ADA COOPER HISTORIC PRESERVATION ENDOWMENT TRUST FUND RESOLUTION NO. 94-115 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAUFORNIA, DECLARING SUPPORT FOR THE ETIWANDA HISTORICAL SOCIETY AND THEIR APPLICATION FOR FUNDING FROM THE ADA COOPER HISTORIC PRESERVATION ENDOWMENT TRUST FUND CONSIDERATION TO RELEASE MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND FOR TRACT 12902. LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF HERMOSA AVENUE NORTH OF HILLSIDE ROAD (NORDIC DEVELOPMENT) Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond S 31J::G].[:X] STATUS REPORT ON YOUTH ACCOUNTABILITY BOARD'S PROGRESS COUNCIL AUTHORI7ATION TO RECRUIT LIBRARY BOARD OF TRUSTEES 385 386 404 405 406 I. COUNCIL BUSINESS The following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion. They are not public hearing items, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. 1. UPDATE ON MARKS CABLFVISION ISSUES DISCUSSION OF FORMAT FOR JUNE 8. 1994 ROUTE 30 MEETING (Oral Discussion] 409 City Council Agenda June 1, 1994 J. IDFNTIFICATION OF ITFMS FOR NFXT MFFTIN~ This is the time for City Council to identify the items they wish to discuss at the next meeting. These items will not be discussed at this meeting, only identified for the next meeting. PAGE 11 K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THF PUBIIC This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. L. ADJOURNMENT MEETING TO RECESS TO EXECUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSS: (1) PROPERTY PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 37350, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF HELLMAN AND WILSON AVENUE (5759 HELLMAN AVENUE), WITH DOROTHY AND WESLEY WEST; RICK GOMEZ AND LARRY HENDERSON NEGOTIATORS; CONCERNING PRICE AND TERMS OF PAYMENT. (2) LABOR NEGOTIATIONS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957.6 TO GIVE ROBERT DOMINGUEZ, ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DIRECTOR, DIRECTION IN REGARDS TO THE MEET AND CONFER PROCESS WITH ALL CITY EMPLOYEE GROUPS EXECUTIVE SESSIONS TO ADJOURN TO BUDGET WORKSHOP TO BE HELD ON THURSDAY, JUNE 9, 1994 AT 5:30 P.M. IN THE TRI-COMMUNITIES CONFERENCE ROOM AT THE CIVIC CENTER. I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on May 26, 1994, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54953 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. April 20, 1994 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Regular Meeting A. CAI,I, TO ORDER A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, April 20, 1994, in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 7:21 p.m. by Mayor Stout Present were Councilmembers: William J. Alexander, Charles J. Buquet II, Rex Gutierrez, Diane Williams, and Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Also present were: Jack Lain, City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Jerry Fulwood, Deputy City Manager; Linda D. Daniels, RDA Manager; Rick Gomez, Community Development Director; Brad Buller, City Planner; Joe O'Neil, City Engineer; Bob Dominguez, Administrative Services Director; Ingrid Blair, GIS Supervisor; Diane O'Neal, Management Analyst II; Chief Dennis Michael, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Capt. Bruce Zeiner, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk. B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS B 1. Presentation of Proclamation Declaring the Month of April as Fair Housing Month. Mayor Stout presented the Proclamation to Cathy Hasan from the Board of Realtors. B2. Presentation of Proclamation Declaring the Week of April 17 - 23, 1994 as Library Week in Rancho Cucamonga. Mayor Stout presented the Proclamation to Jack Lam, City Manager, and Councilmember Diane Williams recognizing Library Week. B3. Jack Lam, City Manager, presented a plaque to Mayor Stout from Norm and Judy Painter of Detco displaying the new City Seal which was laser etched onto a plaque. 1t4. Mayor Stout presented a Proclamation to Kent Crowley for his work with the Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce and commended him for the great job he has done while working there. B5. Councilmember Buquet stated he recen~y went to Sacramento to speak before the Assembly Transportation Commission on the Metrolink Station funding. He stated he also spoke to Assemblymembers Aguiar and Brulte telling them that he hoped funding for the Route 30 Freeway would not be hurt because of the money being spent to rebuild freeways from the earthquake. He stated he also spoke to them about the East Avenue project. He also stated he spoke to Valefie Brown to oppose AB3505. City Council Minutes April 20, 1994 Page 2 CI. C2. C3. C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC (Brought forward from RDA comments) Sergio Martinez and Gaylee Enezumi stated they are forming a Political Action Committee for the Route 30 issue. They asked that the May 10 meeting be held at City Hall instead of in Etiwanda. Bob Lundy, 7965 Vineyard, Suite F5, Vineyard Plaza, stated May 11 is their first Board of Directors meeting this year to be held at the Sycamore Inn. He continued to inform the Council about the handout he had distributed. He hoped that someone from the City could be present at their May 11 meeting. Paul Derafee of Bar Stools, Etc., stated he was President of the Route 66 organization and hoped the City would get involved in their goals and promote tourism. D. CONSENT CALENDAR Jack Lam, City Manager, stated that Item D18 should be pulled from the agenda and continued to the May 4 meeting. He added that Item D20 should be removed from the Consent Calendar because staff is requesting that the Council reject all bids and readvertise the item. D1. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 3/30/94 and 4/6/94; and Payroll ending 3/24/94 for the total amount of $1,573,057.69. D2. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of March 31, 1994. D3. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the construction of Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting at the intersection of Archibald Avenue and Eighth Street, Federal Aid Project No. STPLNHG- 5420 (003) to be funded from FAU Streets, Account No. 24-4637-8914. ITEM REMOVED FOR DISCUSSION BY COUNCILMEMBER GUTIERREZ RESOLUTION NO. 94-060 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING AT THE INTERSECTION OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND EIGHTH STREET, FEDERAL AID PROJECT NO. STPLNHG-5420 (003), IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS 134. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Right Turn Lane at Archibald Avenue and Base Line Road, to be funded from Gas Tax Account No. 09-4637-9211. City Council Minutes April 20, 1994 Page 3 RESOLUTION NO. 94-061 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "RIGHT TURN LANE AT ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND BASE LINE ROAD," IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS D5. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for Highland Avenue from plus or minus 420 feet west of Locust Avenue to plus or minus 1,250 feet east of Locust Avenue, to be funded from Gas Tax Account No. 09-4637-9209. ITEM REMOVED FOR DISCUSSION BY MAYOR STOUT RESOLUTION NO. 94-062 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR "HIGHLAND AVENUE FROM PLUS OR MINUS 420 FEET WEST OF LOCUST AVENUE TO PLUS OR MINUS 1,250 FEET EAST OF LOCUST AVENUE," IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS D6. Approval to transfer City vehicle to the County of San Bernardino for police services. D7. Approval of request by Rancho San Antonio Medical Center to Waive City Fee in conjunction with the "Healthy Kids" Day Event. This event is sponsored by the Rancho Cucamonga Antonio Medical Center and the YMCAs of Rancho Cucamonga and Upland and is open to the public with no charge. D8. Approval of a Temporary Variance of Sports Field Lighting at Heritage Park from July 5 - 30, 1994. D9. Approval to extend Comcast Cable TV Franchise. RESOLUTION NO. 91-012P A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, EXTENDING COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO FRANCHISE LICENSE WITH COMCAST CABLE T.V. FOR 90 DAYS UPON EXPIRATION OF CURRENT LICENSE WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA D10. Approval to Destroy Records and Documents which are no longer required as provided under Government Code Sections 34090 and 34090.5. RESOLUTION NO. 94-063 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE DESTRUCTION OF CITY RECORDS AND DOCUMENTS WHICH ARE NO LONGER REQUIRED AS PROVIDED UNDER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTIONS 34090 AND 34090.5 City Council Minutes April 20, 1994 Page 4 DI 1. Approval of Resolution amending Resolution No. 93-142 to incorporate Personnel Classifications and S~la_ry Benefits for Library Services Position for Fiscal Year 1993/94. RESOLUTION NO. 93-142-C A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 93-142 TO INCORPORATE PERSONNEL CLASSIFICATIONS AND SALARY BENEFITS FOR LIBRARY SERVICES POSITION FOR FISCAL YEAR 1993/94 D12. Approval to set annual special tax for Community Facilities District No. 93-3 (Foothill Marketplace). RESOLUTION NO. 94-064 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 93-3 (FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE) D13. Approval of a Resolution establishing an annual levy within the Alta Loma Channel District No. 84-2, the Sixth Street Industrial Park Refund District No. 82-1R, the Rancho Cucamonga Drainage District No. 86-2 and Milliken South of Arrow District No. 89-1. RESOLUTION NO. 94-065 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF AN ASSESSMENT SURCHARGE FOR THE EXPENSES INCURRED IN THE COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS IN VARIOUS SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS D14. Approval to set annual special tax for Community Facilities District No. 84-1 (Day Creek Drainage System). RESOLUTION NO. 94-066 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 84-1 (DAY CREEK DRAINAGE SYSTEM) D15. Approval to execute a Release of Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement for 5354 Haven Avenue, located on the southwest comer of Vista Grove Street and Haven Avenue, submitted by Hillside Community Church. RESOLUTION NO. 94-067 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RELEASING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FOR 5354 HAVEN AVENUE City Council Minutes April 20, 1994 Page 5 D16. Approval to execute a contract (CO 94-022) with the County of San Bernardino for the collection of special assessments for Community Facilities District No. 93-3 (Foothill Marketplace). D17. Approval to execute two (2) Lease Agreements (CO 94-023 and CO 94-024) between the City of Rancho Cucamonga (Lessor) and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (Lessee) for Fire Station No. 4 and Fire Station No. 5 respectively. D18. Approval to appropriate funds from Fund 12 - Transportation Development Act CYDA) Article 8 in an amount of $326,000.00 and an award and authorization to execute contract (CO 94-025) for the Rancho Cucamonga Metrolink Slation, Phase I, located at Milliken Avenue and the Metrolink Railway, to Riverside Construction for the amount of $3,119,728.70 ($2,836,177.00 plus 10% contingency), to be funded from San Bernardino County Measure I Account No. 37-4637-9326, State Proposition 108 Passenger Rail Bond Act Account No. 36-4637-9326, and TDA Article 8 Account No. 12-4637-9326. ITEM REMOVED FOR DISCUSSION D19. Approval to award and authorization to execute contract (CO 94-026) for the Etiwanda Community Trail Drainage Improvements and Trail Modifications, located west of Etiwanda Avenue and south of Highland Avenue, to KDK Engineering Constructors for the amount of $158,591.40 ($144,174.00 plus 10% contingency), to be funded from Account No. 41-4130-9321. D`30. Approvo/to award and authorization to oxo~uto oontmct (CO 9~1 027) with Ladnor Coatings for Ro~urfaoing of Tmffio Do~trd~'oxking S4xu0turo Improvomont rtrojoot, located at 10500 Civio Contot Drivo, in tho amount of $186,301.50 ($169,365.00 pluo 10~ oontingonoy), to bo fundod from RDA Account No. 17 15000. ITEM REMOVED FROM AGENDA D21. Approval to award and authorization to execute contract (CO 94-028) with IPS Services, Incorporated for the 1993/94 Fiscal Year Street Rehabilitation Program at Various Locations, which includes Hot Asphalt Rubber Overlay, Cape Seal and Slurry Seal, for the amount of $648,162.48 ($589,238.62 plus 10% contingency), to be funded from Systems Development Funds, Account No. 22-4637-9313, 22-4637-9311 and Account No. 10-4637- 9113. ITEM REMOVED FOR DISCUSSION BY MAYOR STOUT D22. Approval to award and authorization to execute contract (CO 94-029) with Underwood Construction Company for the Hellman Avenue at Ninth Street Improvement Project, for the amount of $41,696.60 ($37,906.00 plus 10% contingency), to be funded fi'om Proposition 111 Fund, Account No. 09-4637-9304. D23. Approval to execute Amendment No. 5 to the Lease between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Valley Baseball Club, Incorporated (CO 92-064) to allow the tenant to continue to lease additional space at the Sports Complex for calendar year 1994. D24. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 12895, located on the west side of Baker Avenue south of Foothill Boulevard, submitted by Rancho Citiland Development. RESOLUTION NO. 94-068 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 12895 D25. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 13280, located on the north side of Base Line Road between Milliken Avenue and Rochester Avenue, submitted by Premier Homes. City Council Minutes April 20, 1994 Page 6 RESOLUTION NO. 94-069 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13280 D26. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 13851, located on the northeast comer of Wilson Avenue and Canistel Avenue, submitted by Pacific International Development. RESOLUTION NO. 94-070 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13851 D27. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 13945, located on the southeast comer of East Avenue and Highland Avenue, submitted by Cikation Builders. RESOLUTION NO. 94-071 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13945 D28. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 14 121, located on the southwest comer of Highland Avenue and Milliken Avenue, submitted by J.P. Rhoades Development RESOLUTION NO. 94-072 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 14121 D29. Approval to accept Improvements, Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion for Tract 13280 - Landscape, located on the north side of Base Line Road at Ellena Avenue. Release: Faithful Performance Bond $ 505,200.00 RESOLUTION NO. 94-073 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 13280 - LANDSCAPE, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK D30. Approval to accept Improvements, Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion for Tract 13280 - Railroad Crossing, located on Kenyon Way at the Southern Pacific Railroad Tracks. Release: Faithful Performance Bond $ 240,000.00 City Council Minutes April 20, 1994 Page 7 RESOLUTION NO. 94-074 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 13280 - RAILROAD CROSSING, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK D31. Approval to accept Improvements, Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion for Tract 13281 - Landscape, located on the northwest comer of Base Line Road and Rochester Avenue. Release: Faithful Performance Bond $ 401,100.00 RESOLUTION NO. 94-075 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 13281 - LANDSCAPE, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK D32. Approval to accept Improvements, Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion for Tract 13753 - Landscape, located on the north side of Base Line Road at Ellena Avenue. Release: Faithful Performance Bond $ 225,700.00 RESOLUTION NO. 94-076 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 13753 - LANDSCAPE, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK D33. Approval to accept Improvements, Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion for CLIP 90-18, located on the west side of Santa Anita Avenue north of 4th Street. Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Stree0 $ 137,211.00 RESOLUTION NO. 94-077 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR CUP 90-18 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK D34. Approval to accept Improvements, Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion for Parcel Map 9350, located on Base Line Road between Milliken Avenue and Rochester Avenue. Release Faithful Performance Bond: Base Line Road $1,191,904.00 Infrastructures 385,131.00 Medians 457,000.00 City Council Minutes April 20, 1994 Page 8 RESOLUTION NO. 94-078 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL' MAP 9350 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK D35. Approval to Release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 13441, located on the northeast corner of Kenyon Way, and Victoria Park Lane. Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Stree0 $ 30,000.00 D36. Approval to Release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 13930 - Landscape, located on the east side of Hellman Avenue at Wilson Avenue. Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 22,800.00 D37. Approval to accept Improvements, Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion for the Neighborhood Center Improvement Project, CO 93-070. RESOLUTION NO. 94-079 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Alexander to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports contained in the Consent Calendar with the exception of Items D18, D20, D5, D21 and D3. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Alexander to continue Item D18 to the May 4, 1994 meeting. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Gutierrez to reject all bids and readvertise the project based on staffs recommendation relative to Item D20. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. DISCUSSION OF ITEM D3. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the construction of Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting at the intersection of Archibald Avenue and Eighth Street, Federal Aid Project No. STPLNHG-5420 (003) to be funded from FAU Streets, Account No. 24-4637-8914. Councilmember Gutierrez asked where this project was conceived. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, stated it is one that the City applied for and is approved for traffic reduction. MOTION: Moved by Gutierrez, seconded by Stout to approve Item D3. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. City Council Minutes April 20, 1994 Page 9 DISCUSSION OF ITEM DS. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for Highland Avenue from plus or minus 420 feet west of Locust Avenue to plus or minus 1,250 feet east of Locust Avenue, to be funded from Gas Tax Account No. 09-4637- 9209. Mayor Stout stated he does not know what the project is about. He asked that there be more description in the staff reports about what the project is about and where it is located. He asked if this is a left turn pocket. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, stated yes. MOTION: Moved by Stout, seconded by Buquet to approve Item D5. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. DISCUSSION OF ITEM D21. Approval to award and authorization to execute contract (CO 94-028) with IPS Services, Incorporated for the 1993/94 Fiscal Year Street Rehabilitation Program at Various Locations, which includes Hot Asphalt Rubber Overlay, Cape Seal and S!urry Seal, for the amount of $648,162.48 ($589,238.62 plus 10% contingency), to be funded from Systems Development Funds, Account No. 22-4637-9313, 22-4637-9311 and Account No. 10-4637-9113. Mayor Stout stated the report does not describe the project enough. He made the same request as stated for Item 5. MOTION: Moved by Stout, seconded by Buquet to approve Item D21. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. E. CONSENT ORDINANCES El. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC pl .AN AMENDMENT 94-02 - MASI PARTNERS - A request to modify Subarea 7 to allow limited commercial on 27 acres of land located at the southwest comer of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue, APN: 229-011-10, 19, 21, and 26 through 28; and modify the definition of Automotive Service Courts. Planning Commission recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. JACK MASI REMOVED FOR DISCUSSION. Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title if Ordinance No. 521. Jack Masi, owner of the property, stated that at the last meeting the rezoning of the property was discussed, and thought it was changed to General Commercial with the exception of drug stores and grocery stores. James Markman, City Attorney, referred to page 180, second to the last paragraph, which was specific as to what uses would be allowed. He felt Mr. Masi would be best served to come back to the Council for approval of a Development Agreement when he has a project that would not fall under the use the Council approved at the last meeting. He stated it was not approved as General Commercial, minus a few uses. Jack Lam, City Manager, stated there was another issue of concern at the last meeting also. He stated the applicant's representative indicated they were concerned about timing and that they did not have the time to go back through the Planning Commission process right now. He stated staff asked them what was most important to them, the issue of General Commercial or the issue of getting this done as quickly as possible by inserting the language that they originally wanted that the Planning Commission did not provide them. He stated they agreed to insert the language. City Council Minutes April 20, 1994 Page 10 Councilmember Alexander stated he felt the word "commercial" was supposed to be in the description. James Markman, City Attorney, pointed out that it is in there. Councilmember Buquet stated he is confused as to what Mr. Masi now wants because he felt everything had been worked out at the last meeting and that they were happy with that. Jack Lam, City Manager, stated he felt everything staff was told they needed for this project would fit into the use approved for this property. Councilmember Buquet stated he is confused because he felt Mr. Masi was happy when he left after the last meeting. James Markman, City Attorney, stated there was not any ambiguity as to what happened at the last meeting. Mr. Masi felt he was going to get General Commercial without drug stores or grocery stores, but that now it does not state that. He stated that is what he desires. Councilmember Gutierrez asked him to have faith that this will work out as the project goes along. James Markman, City Attorney, stated it would take about six months to change things at this point if they go back through the process again. He felt they should go ahead with this and then come back at a latter date if Mr. Masi wants to. Jack Lam, City Manager, stated he felt that every use Mr. Masi wanted fits into this agreement. Mayor Stout stated he did not participate at the last meeting so he would abstain from voting. ORDINANCE NO. 521 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 94-02, AMENDING SUBAREA 7 TO ALLOW LIMITED COMMERCIAL AND TO MODIFY THE DEFINITION OF "AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE COURT", AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SLIPPORT THEREOF MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Alexander to waive full reading of Ordinance No. 521. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Williams to approve Ordinance No. 521. Motion carried 4-0-0-1 (Stout abstained). E2. CONSIDERATION OF DEVEI.OPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 94-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - Consideration of an Ordinance amending the Development Code to implement transportation control measure mandated by State and Federal Air Quality Regulations. This action is Categorically Exempt from environmental review per Section 15308 of the CEQA Guidelines. Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the titles of Ordinance Nos. 522 and 523. City Council Minutes April 20, 1994 Page 11 ORDINANCE NO. 522 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 94-01, CHAPTERS 17.08, 17.10 AND 17.12 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE, REGARDING TRIP REDUCTION REQUIREMENTS, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF CONSIDERATION OF INDUSTRIAl. AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 94-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - Consideration of an Ordinance amending the Industrial Area Specific Plan to implement transportation control measures mandated by State and Federal Air Quality Regulations. This action is Categorically Exempt from environmental review per Section 15308 of the CEQA Guidelines. ORDINANCE NO. 523 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 94-01, AMENDING PART III, REGARDING TRIP REDUCTION REQUIREMENTS AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF MOTION: Moved by Gutietrez, seconded by Alexander to waive full reading and approve Ordinance Nos. 522 and 523. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS No items were submitted. G. PUB!,IC HEARINGS No items were submitted. H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS H1. CONSIDERATION OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT (CO 94-016) ON BOOKING FEES AND ADOPTION OF THE AMENDED LAW ENFORCEMENT CONTRACT (CO 94-017) WITH SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY (Item was tabled at February 16, 1994 meeting, and is now being considered) Staff report presented by Jack Lain, City Manager. Mayor Stout asked ff them had been any changes in the agreemenL Jack Lam, City Manager, stated page 204 "Section X" should have the words "or relating to" deleted in the last sentence. City Council Minutes April 20, 1994 Page 12 Councilmember Buquet staP, xi he is concerned with the indemnification clause. James Markman, City Attorney, stated he is not concerned with this and felt "or relating to" was sufficient when it is deleted. MOTION: Moved by Stout, seconded by Alexander to approve CO 94-016 and CO 94-017. unanimously, 5-0. Motion carried I. COUNCIl. BUSINESS CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION IN OPPOSITION OF THE MOBILE HOME INITIATIVE II. Staff report presented by Councilmember Williams, who stated she asked for this to go on the agenda because the residents had asked that the City take a stand on this. She stated the ballot measure would threaten the Accord and the agreements the residents and City have with the owners. Councilmember Gutierrez felt the initiative was a way to take more local control away from the residents. He felt the Council should support the Resolution against the initiative. Mayor Stout asked for clarification because he stated he has a slightly different legal affect of the Accord. He stated he wasn't sure, except when the Accord expires, that this type of State action would take affect because he felt this was a contract and was legally binding. James Markman, City Attorney, stated it is a contract and that the only effect on it would be when renewal time came up for the Accord. He stated in about two and a half years all stabilized rent in Rancho Cucamonga could come to an end and that is when it would be tested. He felt the Accord would survive. Councilmember Williams felt it was important for the City to stand behind the Resolution. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public comment. Addressing the City Council was: Dee Murray talked about how she found out about the initiative and asked that the Council approve the Resolution. There being no further comments, communication was closed. Councilmember Alexander stated he did not think Ms. Murray would find any argument from anybody on this issue. RESOLUTION NO. 94-080 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OPPOSING THE MOBILE HOME INITIATIVE MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Gutierrez to approve Resolution No 94-080. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. Councilmember Buquet asked that this be sent to all neighboring cities asking them to adopt this same type of Resolution. Councilmember Alexander asked that local legislators be informed to help on this issue. City Council Minutes April 20, 1994 Page 13 I2. CONSIDERATION TO APPOINT COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVE TO THE HISTORIC CULTURAL RESOURCE MITIGATION TASK FORCE Staff report presented by Brad Buller, City Planner. ACTION: The Council concurred that Councilmember Gutierrez would be the representative and Councilmember Alexander would be the alternate. I3. UPDATE BY COUNCILMEMBER BUOUET ON SCAG'S REGIONAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (Continued from April 6, 1994) Staff report presented by Councilmember Buquet who also had a video for the Council to view. ACTION: Report received and filed. .I. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING Jl. Councilmember Buquet felt the City needed to explain to local legislators or the Attorney General's office about how petitions are being circulated at stores and other places. J2. Councilmember Buquet asked about a sign he has seen on Foothill Blvd called "Babes Place," and would like to discuss this at the next meeting. J3. Councilmember Willjams stated she would like to talk about the location of the Route 30 meetings. She stated residents in some parts of the City felt other areas were being given special treatmenL Councilmember Gutierrez stated it was requested that these meetings be held at City Hall. Councilmember Williams felt this should be discussed at the next meeting. J4. Councilmember Alexander stated he would like an update on the D.A.R.E. program in schools. He felt the D.A.R.E. Program should be held throughout the City. J5. Councilmember Gutierrez asked if the Route 30 issue should come back for an update every 30 days. Councilmember Buquet suggested that this come back every 60 days. The Council conelifted. J6. Councilmember Gutierrez stated he would like an update on the intersection of Highland and East Avenues. J7. Councilmember Gutierrez stated he would like information on RV parking on streets and felt better control was needed. J8. Councilmember Gutierrez felt that there should be something established for overnight parking of vehicles on City streets. City Council Minutes April 20, 1994 Page 14 K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBIJC KI. Frank Munos, Co-Chair of the PAC for Route 30, felt the first meeting should be held in a central location and then move around to other locations in the City. He felt the first meeting should be held at City Hall. Councilmember Buquet stated this is the first of a series of meetings and that the other meetings could be throughout the City. He stated the City is just the facilitator of these meetings. Mr. Munos asked that other meeting dates and places be set when this is discussed at the next meeting. I,. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Alexander to adjourn to an Executive Session to discuss labor negotiations per G.C. Section 54957.6 to give Robert Dominguez, Administrative Services Director, direction in regards to the meet and confer process with all City employee groups; and to discuss property negotiations per G.C. 54956.8 for property located south of Foothill Boulevard on the west side of Rochester Avenue; James Markman and Linda D. Daniels Negotiating for the City with Valley Baseball Club, to discuss terms of payment. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. The meeting adjourned at 9:24 p.m. No action was taken in Executive Session. Respectfully submitted, Debra J. Ariains, CMC City Clerk Approved: MEETING TO ADJOURN TO EXECUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSSION PROPERTY MATTERS PER GOVERNMENT CODE 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED SOUTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD ON THE WEST SIDE OF ROCHESTER AVENUE; JAMES MARKMAN AND LINDA D. DANIELS NEGOTIATING FOR THE CITY WITH VALLEY BASEBALL CLUB, TO DISCUSS TERMS OF PAYMENT. May 4, 1994 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Regular Meeting A. CAI,I, TO ORDER A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, May 4, 1994, in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called m order at 7:03 p.m. by Chainnan Dennis L. Smut. Present were Councilmembers: William J. Alexander, Charles J. Buquet II, Rex Gutierrez, Diane Williams, and Chairman Dennis L. Stout. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; Ralph Hanson, Deputy City Attorney; Jerry B. Fulwood, Deputy City Manager; Brad Buller, City Planner; Nancy Fong, Sr. Planner; Anthea Hatfig, Associate Planner; Richard Alcorn, Code Enforcement Supervisor; Jee O'Neil, City Engineer; Bob Zetterberg, Integrated Waste Coordinator; Bill Makshanoff, Building Official; Bob Dominguez, Administrative Services Director; Suzanne Oia, Community Services Manager; Deborah Clark, Library Manager; Diane O'Neal, Management Analyst II; Susan Mickey, Management Analyst I; Chief Dennis Michael, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Capt. Bruce Zeiner, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk. B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS B 1. Presentation of Proclamation recognizing the f'wst week of May as "Blue Ribbon Week." Mayor Stout presented the Proclamation m Deputy Tim Masterson. B2. Presentation of Proclamation declaring the week of May 8-14, 1994 as "Preservation Week" in Rancho Cucamonga. Mayor Smut presented the Proclamation m Anthea Hartig, Associate Planner. B3. Presentation of Proclamations to Sat Briguglio, Rancho Cucamonga Rotary Club, the Rancho Cucamonga Quakes, and the California Angels for sponsoring a baseball clinic m support the D.A.R.E. program. Mayor Stout presented,the Proclamations m Sat Briguglio, Terry Segal, John LeCompte and Tim Masterson. Also recognized were the California Angels and Mark Davis with the Padres. Mayor Stout also mentioned Tommy Davis, former Dodger player now residing in Rancho Cucamonga, who also assisted with this event. B4. Mayor Smut intreduced Deborah Clark, the City's new Librarian. City Council Minutes May 4, 1994 Page 2 C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBI,IC C 1. Presentation to the City Council from the Rancho Cucamonga Historic Route 66 Visitors Bureau on the occasion of the Eleventh Annual National Tourist Appreciation Day. Bob Lundy talked about the Visitor's Bureau. Additionally, Joe Godera, who was the 1,500th visitor to the museum, thanked the City Council for the beautiful City that it is. Mr. Lundy stated Mr. Derafee was not present to make the presentation as was planned, but did present the Council with buttons to wear. D. CONSENT CAI,ENDAR Jack Lam, City Manager, requested Item D7 be postponed until the May 18, 1994 meeting, and stated there are corrected account numbers for Item D9 as stated in a memorandum on file in the office of the City Clerk. D1. Approval of Minutes: April 6, 1994 D2. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 4/13/94 and 4/20/94; and Payroll ending 4/7/94 for the total amount of $1,002,952.29. D3. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Bike Pathways and Lockers at various locations, to be funded from Air Quality Improvement Grant Account No. 14-4158-6028. ITEM REMOVED FOR DISCUSSION BY COUNCILMEMBER GUTIERREZ. RESOLUTION NO. 94-081 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE BIKE LOCKERS AT CITY HALL AND THE CITY CORPORATE YARD AND BIKE PATHWAYS LOCATED ON CHURCH STREET AND TERRA VISTA PARKWAY, FOURTH STREET, ARROW ROUTE, GREENWAY CORRIDOR (TERRA VISTA), ETIWANDA AVENUE IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS D4. Approval of a resolution of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, adopting the Five-Year Capital Improvement Program and Twenty-Year Transportation Plan as required for expenditures of Measure I Funds. RESOLUTION NO. 94-082 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AND TWENTY-YEAR TRANSPORTATION PLAN FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF MEASURE I FUNDS City Council Minutes May4, 1994 Page 3 D5. Approval of a resolution of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga approving the submittal of Used Oil Opportunity Grant to the California Integrated Waste Management Board - The City of Upland in conjunction with the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Chino, Chino Hills, and Montelair has prepared an application to the California Integrated Waste Management Board for Waste Oil Opportunity Grant Funds. The grant application must be accompanied by a City Council Resolution which authorizes the City of Upland to submit the application to the California Integrated Waste Management Board. RESOLUTION NO. 94-083 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER OF UPLAND TO EXECUTE ALL NECESSARY APPLICATIONS, CONTRACTS AND AGREEMENT FUNDS FROM THE USED OIL RECYCLING FUND UNDER THE USED OIL RECYCLING ENHANCEMENT ACT D6. Approval to seek Requests for Proposal for Professional Services for furnishing video taping and inspection of storm water pipeline to meet the 1990 Federal Regulations establishing the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES), to be funded from General Fund - Account No. 01-4637-6028. ITEM REMOVED FOR DISCUSSION BY COUNCILMEMBER GUTIERREZ. D7. Approval to appropriate funds from Fund 12 - Transportation Development Act (TDA) Article 8 in an amount of $326,000.00 and award and authorization for execution of contract (CO 94-025) for the Rancho Cucamonga Metrolink Station, Phase I, located at Milliken Avenue and the Metrolink Railway, to Riverside Construction for the amount of $3,119,728.70 ($2,836.117.00 plus 10% contingency), to be funded from Measure I, Account No. 37-4637-9326, State Rail Bond Act, Account No. 36-4637-9326, and TDA Article 8, Account No. 12- 4637-9326. (Item continued from April 20, 1994) D8. Approval to authorize the Mayor to execute the Joint Powers Agreement (CO 94-030) to accept Public Risk Sharing Authority of California as our self-insured pool and authorize all the governing documents for participation in the self-insurance programs. RESOLUTION NO. 94-084 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE REVISED AND RESTATED JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT CREATING THE PUBLIC AGENCY RISK SHARING AUTHORITY OF CALIFORNIA (PARSAC) D9. Approval to award and authorization to execute contract (CO 94-031) for the Landscaping of Rochester Avenue East Side Parkway, from Victoria Park Lane to Highland Avenue, to Kruze and Kruze Construction for the amount of $201,236.32 ($182,942.11 plus 10% contingency) to be funded from RDA Account No. 11-51000 and Fund 10 Account No. 10-4637-9072. D10. Approval to award and authorization to execute contract (CO 94-032) for Calaveras Avenue Street Improvements, from Chaffee Street AHey to Ninth Street, to J.E.G. Construction, Incorporated, for the amount of $83,294.00 ($75,721.91 plus 10% contingency) to be funded from CDBG Funds Account No. 28-4333-9331. D11. Approval to award and au~torization to execute contract (CO 94-033) for Milliken Park, Park Modifications and parking Lot Extension, located at 7699 Milliken Avenue to Eastland Construction Company for the amount of $169,099.70 ($153,727.00 plus 10% contingency) to be funded from Account No. 43-4130-9323. City Council Minutes May 4, 1994 Page 4 D12. Approval of Preliminary Engineer's Reports and Setting Public Hearing for June 1, 1994 to levy the annual assessments (no increase recommended for Fiscal Year 1994/95) and approve the Engineer's Reports for Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8. ITEM REMOVED FOR DISCUSSION BY COUNCILMEMBER GUTIERREZ. RESOLUTION NO. 94-085 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORTS FOR STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8 RESOLUTION NO. 94-086 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8, FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1994/95 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO D13. Approval of Preliminary Engineer's Reports and Setting of Public Hearing for June 1, 1994 to levy the annual assessments (no increase recommended for Fiscal Year 1994/95) and approve the Engineer's Reports for Landscape Maintenance Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8. ITEM REMOVED FOR DISCUSSION BY COUNCILMEMBER GUTIERREZ. RESOLUTION NO. 94-087 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORTS FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8 RESOLUTION NO. 94-088 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1994/95 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO D14. Approval of Preliminary Engineer' s Report and Setting of the Public Hearing for June 1, 1994 to levy the annual assessments (no increase recommended for Fiscal Year 1994/95) and approve the engineer' s Report for Park and Recreation Improvement District (PD-85). ITEM REMOVED FOR DISCUSSION BY COUNCILMEMBER GUTIERREZ. City Council Minutes May 4, 1994 Page 5 RESOLUTION NO. 94-089 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORTS FOR PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PD-85) RESOLUTION NO. 94-090 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PD-85) FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1994/95 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO DISCUSSION OF ITEM D3. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Bike Pathways and Lockers at various locations, to be funded from Air Quality Improvement Grant Account No. 14-4158-6028. Councilmember Gutierrez asked if the grant money has to be spent for the lockers. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, stated this is what it is intended for, and that there are regulations as to what it can be spent on. DISCUSSION OF ITEM D6. Approval to seek Requests for Proposal for Professional Services for furnishing video taping and inspection of storm water pipeline to meet the 1990 Federal Regulations establishing the National Poilutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES), to be funded from General Fund - Account No. 01-4637-6028. Councilmember Gufierrez questioned how the money was being spent to do the videotaping. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, stated it was being done in the least inexpensive manner. Jack Lam, City Manager, stated the $70,000.00 does not complete this project, that this is only the money that gets it started. He stated the other funds to be spent on this program would be discussed in the future. Councilmember Alexander asked if the City can talk and work with other cities to try to get the State to pay for this mandate. Jack Lam, City Manager, stated the City is working with the League of California Cities on this matter. He stated all it has done is make government stop and look at mandates for the future and how they are to be funded. Councilmember Gutierrez stated he would like Jack Lam to let the Council know if any cities refuse to comply with this mandate. City Council Minutes May 4, 1994 Page 6 DISCUSSION OF ITEM D12. Approval of Preliminary Engineer's Reports and Setting Public Hearing for June 1, 1994 to levy the annual assessments (no increase recommended for Fiscal Year 1994/95) and approve the Engineer's Reports for Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8. RESOLUTION NO. 94-085 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORTS FOR STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8 RESOLUTION NO. 94-086 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8, FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1994/95 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO DISCUSSION OF ITEM DI3. Approval of Preliminary Engineer's Reports and Setting of Public Hearing for June 1, 1994 to levy the annual assessments (no increase recommended for Fiscal Year 1994/95) and approve the Engineer's Reports for Landscape Maintenance Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8. RESOLUTION NO. 94-087 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORTS FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8 RESOLUTION NO. 94-088 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1994/95 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO DISCUSSION OF ITEM D14. Approval of Preliminary Engineer's Report and Setting of the Public Hearing for June 1, 1994 to levy the annual assessments (no increase recommended for Fiscal Year 1994/95) and approve the engineer's Report for Park and Recreation Improvement District (PD-85). City Council Minutes May 4, 1994 Page 7 RESOLUTION NO. 94-089 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER' S ANNUAL REPORTS FOR PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PD-85) RESOLUTION NO. 94-090 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PD-85) FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1994/95 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO Councilmember Gutierrez clarified that this is just setting the public hearing and asked if he would have the opportunity to discuss it at a future meeting. Councilmember Williams asked if this would be more than the regular legal advertising as has been done in the past. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, stated there would be additional advertising, but not as much as before since the City is not raising the rates. He stated the information about the public hearing would also be in the newsletter that goes to the residents. MOTION: Moved by Gufierrez, seconded by Willjams to approve the recommendations in the staff reports contained in the Consent Calendar with the exception of Item D7. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. No items were submitted. E. CONSENT ORDINANCES F. ADVERTISED PUBI,IC HEARINGS F1. CONSIDBRATIOM OF A RESOLUTION UPDATING TIlE CITY'g COMPRE-IIENSIVE ~ 8CIIEDULE IlgSOL/.rHON NO. 9~ 001 A RESOLUTIOI~I OF TIIE CITY COUNCIL OF TIIE CITY OF RANCIIO CUCAhlOi~IGA, CALIFORNIA, RFst~ALINC RESOLUTION NOS. 93 035, 92 223 1, 9~ 223 B, AND 92 323 C A)ID EgTABLIglHI~G A I~IEW COMPRE.IIF.,NglVE FEE SCIIFs.DULE FOR Prta,RMITS AND SERVICES PROVIDED BY ALL CITY DEPARTMENTS, TIrl~ RAI~ICIIO CUCAMONCA FIRE PROTI~CTION DISTRICT A)ID TIIE RANCIIO CUCAMO)IGA POLICE DFff'ARTh47_~T BY MODI/:"YINC CERTAIN FBES ESTABLIgIIED IN RESOLUTION 92 223. City Council Minutes May 4, 1994 Page 8 ACTION: Item FI was removed from the agenda in order for the appropriate legal advertising requirements to be met. F2. CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAl. USE PERMIT 78-03 - SAM'S PLACE - An appeal of the Planning Commission's decision to revoke the Conditional Use Permit for the operation of a bar in conjunction with a restaurant in the Neighborhood Commercial District, located at the northwest coruer of 19th and Carnelian Streets - APN: 201-811-56 through 60. Staff report presented by Nancy Fong, Sr. Planner. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the City Council were: John Mannerino, representing the appellant, stated because of pending litigation, that he and Mr. Pellegrino did not speak at the Planning Commission meeting. Mr. Pellegrino distributed a letter to the City Council. Mr. Mannerino stated Mr. Pellegrino is looking for a new location for his business that will be better for the type of business he has. He asked that the revocation be postponed until after September 17 when Mr. Pellegrino's lease would be up at his present location which would allow Mr. Pellegrino to operate his bar under slxict enforcement. Joe Fabis, 6611 Topaz, felt the City should protect the residents and that Sam's Place should have to comply with all regulations. He stated he supports the Planning Commission's decision. Councilmember Williams asked him what he sees as the problem with Sam 's Place. Mr. Fabis stated he felt it is the type of activity that goes on at night, i.e., with the noise and all. He felt the business was a nuisance. Councilmember Williams asked if it was this bad four years ago when the business started. Mr. Fabis stated with the expansion of the use permits, it got worse. There being no further response, the public hearing was closed. Councilmember Alexander stated he respects Mr. Fabis' opinions, but wondered if it was prudent to continue the matter to September. He stated he was also concerned about the people that are employed at Sam's Place losing their jobs. He stated he felt the Planning Commission's report should be accepted, but to let the business stay open until September 17. Councilmember Buquet stated he appreciates Mr. Pellegrino's position, but was also tired of this whole issue. He felt ff the Council considers extending this until September, that the hours of operation should be limited. He felt this would be a good faith measure on all parties. Councilmember Gutierrez felt there were a lot of good qualifies in Sam and stated he was impressed with the letter that Mr. Pellegrino wrote. He felt Sam was really sorry and that the Council should forgive him and let him continue with his business until September. He stated he could also sympathize with the neighbors. City Council Minutes May 4, 1994 Page 9 Councilmember Willjams stated she would go along with closing the business at midnight and to let him continue until September, but that she would like a guarantee that they will be moving in September and not come back at that time asking for this to be continued for another year or so. She also inquired about the parking lot attendant at the rear of the building and felt all conditions imposed on this business should be enforcecL Mayor Stout stated he has never voted for this business to be in its present location and does not feel Sam's Place belongs there. He felt Mr. Pellegrino has repeatedly not met all the conditions and did not think it should be extended. Councilmember Alexander felt the transition should also be considered and that if Mr. Pellegrino does not comply, that could result in immediate closure. RESOLUTION NO. 94-092 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING THE APPEAL AND UPHOLDING THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION IN REVOKING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 78-03 FOR THE OPERATION OF A BAR IN CONJUNCTION WITH A RESTAURANT, SAM'S PLACE, LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF 19TH AND CARNELIAN STREETS IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 201-811-56 THROUGH 60 CONSIDERATION OF ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT 91-02 - SAM'S PLACE - An appeal of the Planning Commission's decision to revoke an Entertainment Permit for a bar and restaurant in the Neighborhood Commercial District, located at the northwest comer of 19th and Carnelian Streets - APN: 201-811-56 through 60. RESOLUTION NO. 94-093 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING THE APPEAL AND UPHOLDING THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION IN REVOKING ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT NO. 91-02 FOR A BAR AND RESTAURANT, SAM'S PLACE, LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF 19TH AND CARNELIAN STREETS IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 201-811-56 THROUGH 60 MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Gutierrez to continue the matter until September 21, 1994. Motion carried 3-2 (Stout and Buquet voted no). Councilmember Willjams asked if this motion included the closing of the business at 12:00 midnighL Mayor Stout stated it did not include that. She then asked for a reconsideration of the motion. The Council asked to clarify the motion in order to re-vote so that the motion includes the business closing at 12:00 midnight. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated they are not in compliance with current conditions, i.e., the posting of signs, the landscaped barrier gate for the rear parking lot, and asked if that should go with the motion. City Council Minutes May 4, 1994 Page I0 Councilmember Alexander stated they should be in full compliance with all previously set conditions. MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Buquet to allow Sam's Place one week to come into compliance with all conditions, including fixing the gates at the back of the building, the hours of operation shall close at 12:00 midnight and continue the matter to September 21, 1994. Motion carried 4-1 (Stout voted no). No items were submitted. No items were submitted. G, PUBI.IC HEARINGS CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS I, COUNCIl. BUSINESS Jack Lam, City Manager, stated there is an emergency item to be added which is as follows and would be considered as item 15: CONSIDERATION OF CO-SPONSORING HIGH SCHOOL ALL STAR GAME WITH QUAKES AND DAILY BULLETIN TO BENEHT "SEND AN UNDERPRIVILEGED KID TO CAMP" PROGRAM MOTION: Moved by Stout, seconded by Alexander to add the item. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. I1. tIPDATE REPORT ON D.A.R.E. PROGRAM IN ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS Staff report presented by Jerry Fulwood, Deputy City Manager. Councilmember Gutierrez asked when the money needs to be in place. Jerry Fulwood, Deputy City Manager, stated by September, but that an officer needs to start training now. Jack Lam, City Manager, stated any funding for this will have to be factored into the budget. Jerry Fulwood, Deputy City Manager, stated that some School Districts would be paying more than other Districts because of the number of fifth grade classes they have. Councilmember Alexander stated he felt all the Council wanted all fifth graders to benefit from the D.A.R.E. program. He felt the program should go forth and the money found to do this. Councilmember Buquet felt the schools should help out financially. He felt the people that would be teaching this program should be using current materials. He did not feel community service officers should be used to teach and felt sworn personnel should be used instead. City Council Minutes May 4, 1994 Page 11 Jack Lam, City Manager, stated normally this would have been discussed at the Superintendent's meeting, but that the next one is not scheduled until June. Sonja Yates, Central School District, thanked the City for their commitment to the program. She stated schools are actually struggling also and that she would have to talk to her Board before she could commit to any f'mancial support to this program. Gene Newton, Etiwanda School District, stated they would support the program. David Shukman, student at Alia Loma High School, stated he has seen more drug abuse among the students as he grows older. He felt this program would be very beneficial. Aaron Parket, Alia Loma High School, also felt the D.A.R.E. program would be beneficial to the students. He felt the program would be a great service to the community. ACTION: Report received and fried. I2. DISCUSSION ON BABE'S CLUB 66 Staff report presented by Brad Butler, City Planner. Mayor Stout asked him to explain what a nonconforming use was which Mr. Buller continued to do. Mayor Stout asked if this building would have to meet all current standards. Brad Bullet, City Planner, stated yes and that the applicant has been informed of this. Councilmember Buquet stated he had this brought up because of some input he has received from other people. He felt anytime there is sale of alcohol at a business or an entertainment permit involved, the matter should go before the entire Council for approval. Councilmember Gutierrez stated he agreed with Councilmember Buquet's suggestion on the Council's involvement with the alcohol use and entertainment. ACTION: Report received and fled. I3. DISCUSSION ON WHERE TO CONDUCT ROUTE 30 MEETINGS Staff report presented by Joe O'Neil, City Engineer. Mayor Stout asked who decides when another meeting is needed. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, stated it would be at the direction of the City Council. Mayor Stout felt regularly scheduled meetings would be appropriate until no one came to participate in the meetings. Councilmember Buquet stated them are also other agencies that have to be considered when scheduling these meetings. City Council Minutes May 4, 1994 Page 12 Councilmember Gutierrez stated it was his understanding that this would also come back to the Council every 60 days for updates. ACTION: Report received and fded. I4. STATUS REPORT ON INTERSECTION OF HIGHLAND AND EAST AVENUES (Oral Report) Staff report presented by Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, who advised staff has been concerned about this intersection since the last collision occurred. He stated reports indicate there is an increase in traffic accidents at this location. He stated Caltrans has been contacted since the last accident so they could further investigate. He pointed out that this street is under Caltrans' authority and not the City's. He stated letters have been sent m our legislators to try to get something done at this intersection, and that staff would like m get a signal installed as soon as possible. Mayor Smut felt concern should be expressed to the Chaffey Joint Union High School District that they should not use a school bus crossing at this intersection and that they should use Etiwanda and Highland instead. He felt the students at Etiwanda High School should be contacted asking them to use the light at Etiwanda and Highland instead. Councilmember Gutierrez stated he agreed with Mayor Stout. Jim Frost stated he was coucerned for the safety of his daughter that was about m start driving. He stated he is willing m help the City with this issue. Candice Fowler, Catalpa Street, stated she has a petition with 400 signatures supporting the signal at this intersection. She felt something needed to be done immediately at this Iccation. Councilmember Buquet stated he had concerns with only installing stop signs at this intersection, because he felt that might cause more of a ha~.ard. Mary Dodds, 6709 Mango, stated her son was in the accident in March. She stated she does not want this to happen again. She stated it is shameful that nothing has been done at this intersection to assure more safety. She felt her side of the City has been neglected and felt something should be doue immediately. Councilmember Alexander stated the residents' help is needed because this is a state highway and it is hard m get things done as quickly as the City would like m. Mayor Smut asked if the housing development that wraps around the corner of East and Highland had conditions to put in sueet improvements at that location, and was wondering about those. Brad Butler, City Planner, asked ff this was the Citation Homes tract. Mayor Stout replied yes and asked if that included the improvements at East Avenue. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, stated yes. Mayor Smut reiterated that the City was prepared m have Citation Homes take care of that intersection, but that Callrans told the City they would not agree to that and deleted those conditions and stated this was several years ago. City Council Minutes May 4, 1994 Page 13 I5. CONSIDERATION OF CO-SPONSORING HIGH SCHOOL ALL-STAR GAME WITH OUAKES & DAILY BULLETIN TO BENEFIT "SEND AN UNDERPRIVILEGED KID TO CAMP" PROGRAM (Emergency Add-On Item) Staff report presented by Jack Lam, City Manager. MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Williams to approve co-sponsoring the High School All-Star Game on June 6, 1994. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0 .I. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING Jl. Councilmember Alexander mentioned recognition should be given to the residents that were involved in apprehending the purse snatcher that had recently occurred. Mayor Stout stated this has already been set up. K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBI,IC No communications were made from the public. AD.IOURNMENT MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Alexander to adjourn. Motion camed unanimously, 5-0. The meeting adjourned at 9:10 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk Approved: CITY OF RANCNQ CUCANQNGA LiST OF MARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 05-11-96 (93/96) RUN DATE: 05111196 PAGE: 1 VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION MARR NO WARR. ANT. 1060 BAKERe DUANE 3?21 VILLAGE NURSERIES 3606 ECOFFe JiLL 6263 OREAM QUEST 6269 CSMFO 85 CUCANONGA CO MATER DIST 3901 3-D CARPET g DRAPERY 3366 8th AVENUE GRAPHICS I A L A EQUIPMENT RENTALS COow ZNCo 6244 AOVANCEO ACOUSTIC 6245 ALBRECNTSENe VALERiB 3778 ALPERTe MELANZE 17 ALTA FiRE EQUiPmENT CO. 1630 AMERICAN BUSINESS FORMS 609 AMERICAN EXPRESS 6266 AMERICAS MAGAZINE DiSTRiBUTION 2491 ANGELUS ENGINE CENTER 2076 APOLLO INDUSTRIES iNC, 2982 AUDIO GRAPHICS SYSTEMS 602 AUTO RESTORATORS 6229 BACICHe PATRXCK 6229 8ACZCMe PATRICK 33 BASELINE TRUE VALUE HARDMARE 6247 BELL L HOMELL DOCUMENT 555 BENEFXELOe KXNGSLEY 6266 BEST VEHICLE REGISTRATION SERVICE 1267 BLAKE PAPER CODe INC. 6153 BOAMANe CAPTORIA 162 8RADFOROe HAROLD 3193 8RUNZCKe ALVAeEl g BATTERSBY 6156 8RUNHERe EO 1166 BRUNSNICK DEER CREEK LANES 1678 BUILDING NENSt [NC- SSZ 8URK-BLACKSCHLEGERe ROSEANN 461 CARE AMERICA HEALTH PLAN 68 CENTRAL CiTiES SIGN SERVICE 916 CLAREMONT CAMERA 1480 CLARION HOTEL 969 CLARKe KAREN 6250 CON-TEL SYSTEMS Z692 COMPUSERVEe INCORPORATEO 3958 COMPUTRAZN 6262 CONSUMER REPORTS 6Z51 CRUZe MAXZMO ADAM 85 CUCAMONGA CO HATER OZST 85 CUCAMONGA CO MATER OZST 3331 CUNERTYe ANNA EAP MEETING (<( LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES ((( PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT REFUND DAMAGE DEPOSIT LEGISLATIVE MEETING MONTHLY MATER 8iLLINGS <<< PROFESSIONAL SERVICES OFFICE SUPPLIES VEHICLE MAiNTENANCE/SUPPLIES BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND RECREATION REFUND INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT SERVICE/SUPPLiES OFFICE SUPPLIES AMERICAN EXPRESS BILLINGS BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND VEHICLE MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES OFFICE EQUIPMENT VEHICLE MAINTENANCE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNO ZNSTRUCT1R PAYMENT BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND RECREATION SUPPLIES INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT INSTRUCTOR PAYRENT 80OKXNG FEES INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT iNSTRUCTOR PAYMENT SUBSCRIPTION INSTRUCTOR PNT MEDICAL PREMIUM MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES/SERVICES HOTEL RESERVATIONS INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND MONTHLY SERVICE INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT SUBSCRIPTION REFUNO PARKING CITATION MONTHLY MATER 81LLINGS MONTHLY HATER BILLINGS INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT el CHECKel OVERLAP 85694, 28.86 85895- 86276 ))) el 86275 256.60- 86276- 86Z85 I 86286, 636.66 66287, 2,031.22 86288, 65.00 86289, 13,930.00 86290- 86291 86292 337.75 el 86293 201.50 I 86Z96 373.96 86295 13.69 86296 4.00 86297 326.00 86298 102.93 I 86299 1e936.22 86300 22.23 86301 6.00 66302 24,55 86303 115.69 86306 2.138.84 86305 165.85 I 86306 650.00 86307 ZZ5.O0 el 86308 353.79 86309 313.73 86310 158.40 86311 57.20 86312 15.86 86313 126.00 86314 69.30 el 86315 280.44 66316 288.00 86311 292,05 el 86318 731.83 86319 2,779.63 86320 238468.60 86321 134.67 66322 157.93 86323 660.00 66326 86.48 66325 7,83 86326 63.18 86327 lelTO.O0 66328 ZZ.O0 86329 55.00 86330- 66330 I 86331 8t730.52 86332 let69.00 86333 257.60 CITY OF RANCHQ CUCAMONGA LIST UF MARRANTS FOR PERiO0:05-11-94 C93/943 RUN DATE: 05/11/96 PAGE: Z VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION NARR NO NARR. ANT. 517 O! 3964 OP Z39 D L K CONCRETE CO 286 DAISY NHEEL RIBBON COt iNC 107 DETCO 513 EASTMANe [NC 3878 FISCHERs AUDREE 6252 FRANK'S HEATING & A.C. SERVICE 139 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIES 1179 GREENNOOO'S UNIFORMS 137 GTE CALIFORNIA I2549 HARTFORD ESCRONs INCo STREET HAINTENANCE OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNO OFFICE SUPPLIES UNXFORN SERVICE NONTHLY TELEPHONE 6XLLXNGS BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 3334 HEZLZGs KELLY iNSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 637 HINDERLITERs de LLAHA$ C ASSOCIATES SALES TAX AUDIT SERVICES 161 HOYT LUMeER CO.s ZBIZ HOYTs RAYNONO 3436 HUNTs LUANNE 495 HTDRO-SCAPE PRODUCTSt INC 3515 XCKE$t SCOTT - "EQUINOXe 46 INDUSTRIAL ASPHALT 92 ZNLANO VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 4190 JONES INOUSTRZAL 179 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN 6191 KALAUSEKs STACY 3963 KEATSt NARY ANN 1471 KNAPP SHOE COMPANY 1218 KNOX 172 KOZLOVICHs DEBBIE 4005 KRUZE t KRUZE CONSTRUCTION t ENGo 321 LANDSCAPE bEST 12568 LASTING iHPRE$$ION$ PRINTING CO. 849 LANSON PRODUCTSt INC. 12544 LINOENs GAYLORD 600 LYNCMs JANIE 956 MAC DONALOe ZAIN 7ZZ MAGALLANESe LZNOA 3800 HASTER$, TIMOTHY 3015 MC CALLs SUSAN 4234 NZLAZLOs THOM 12566 HILLERe LURA 3057 MILLSt HART )960 NOLONETs JiM 422Z MORENO VALLEYs CITY OF 3333 MOTTt SYLVIA 6236 HOULDINGS E HILLNORK 4112 McOONALD CONSTRUCTION 4235 N.DeOeAo 7TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE 3637 NATIONAL UNIFORM SERVICE 4036 NZCHOLSe FRED 3332 NICKLESt ARLIEEN 12545 NUNMe CAROL TC STUDXQSt INC. TO ICE SKATING CENTER MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES iNSTRUCTOR PAYMENT iNSTRUCTOR PHT LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES ART IN THE PARK ENTERTAINMENT MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES SUBSCRIPTIONS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES MEOICAL iNSURANCE INSTRUCTOR PMT INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT SAFETY SHOES HAXNTENANCE SUPPLIES iNSTRUCTOR PAYHINT PROGRESS ESTIMATE ll LANOSCAPE MAINTENANCE BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES REFUND PARKING CiTATiON RECREATION SUPPLIES INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT DoA.R.E. ~EETZNG INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT LUNCHTiME CONCERT PERFORNANCE RECREATION REFUND iNSTRUCTOR PATRENT INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT RENTAL OF CATERPILLAR MR-iS0 iNSTRUCTOR PAYMENT FORMICA COMPUTER IORK STATION EHERGENCY ROOF REPAIR TTH ANNUAL UNIFORM SERVICES ZN$TRUCIL,~ PAYMENT INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT RECREATION REFUND iNSTRUCTOR PAYMENT iNSTRUCTOR PAYMENT OVERLAP 86336 268,30 86335 219.67 66336 Z02,52 86337 53.62 86338 158o60 86339 16.32 86340 180.72 86361 504.11 86342 35.67 86363 60.66 86344 764.10 86365 8s233.22 86346 97.77 86367 2s532.66 86368 420.00 86349 136.12 86350 300.00 86351 604,93 86352 26,88 86353 67.88 86354 24t619.12 86355 50.40 86356 251.10 86357 97.68 86358 331o69 86359 1e016.00 ~6360 39.66 86361 86362 44.'94 86363 10025.56 86366 255.00 86365 4.69 86366 SIO.30 86361 235.95 86368 705.98 86369 18.60 86370 250.00 86371 15.00 86372 135.00 86313 320.00 86374 746.73 86375 234,00 86316 953.63 86377 115.00 86378 125.00 86379 70074 86380 1s492.61 86381 t08.00 8638Z 15.00 86383 10~45.35 86384 835.20 CITY OF RANCMO CUCAMQNGA LIST OF MARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 05-11-96 (931963 RUN DATE: 05/1i/96 PAGE: 3 VENDOR NAME ZTEH DESCRIPTION NARR NO NARRo AMTo $$ CHECKe OVERLAP I2547 OUTPOST CLEANERS BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 86385 25.46 1623 PAGENET PAGING SERVICE I 86386 63°00 757 PEP BOYS VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I 86381 40.88 1079 PHOTO HOUSE OF CALIFORNIA PHOTO SUPPLIES I 86388 126,06 6193 PLASTI-CLIP CORP, OFFICE SUPPLIES 86369 206°27 791 PHI/DELTA CARE MEDICAL INSURANCE 86390 757o86 255 POMA DISTRIBUTING CO VEHICLE MAINTENANCE & SUPPLIES I 86391 9,622.55 1049 POMONA VALLEY KANASAKZ VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I 66392 80,72 2719 PONCHAUOe JANICE INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 86393 118,60 4159 PRENTZS, BETH INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 66394 31.80 3286 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL MEDICAL/DISABILITY INSURANCE 86395 66,396.10 65 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY MAiNTEnANCE SUPPLIES I 86396 156o39 251 R L R AUTOMOTIVE VEHICLE MAXNTfSUPPLXES~SERVXCE I 86391 2e252,36 8599 RANPLUS TECH bUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS 86398 150o00 228 RANCHO CUCA REDEVELOPMINT AGENCY REIMBURSE GRANT FUNDS 86399 437°56 Z60O RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE OXSTRXCT PLAN CHECK SERVICES 86400 163.77 4130 RBM LOCK ~ KEY SERVICE MAINTENANCE SUPPLZES 8 86401 q9.19 8600 RICHARDSOMe DEBRA PKG CITATION FINE REFUND 86602 55°00 3432 RIDOe LINDA INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 86403 63o00 2T6 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT PRINTS I 86406 19°49 3335 ROSE, CHRXSTXE INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 86605 67°50 6601 S.C. DONUTS BUSINESS LXC REFUNDS 86406 34°51 2084 SAFECO LiFE INS° COo GROUP ADNXNo MEDICAL XNSURANCE 86607 81.82 132 SAN DIEGO ROTARY BROOM COt INC MAINT SUPPLXES 86408 200°42 3067 SAUL, SANDY INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 86409 161o50 6Z53 SECURE SAVINGS BANK DRAINAGE FEE REFUND 86410 2,600°00 535 SIMPLE, JUDY INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 86611 184,66 3717 SERVICE NERCHANDISE SUXPPLXES 86412 45.99 2507 SIEBE ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLS SERVICE/SUPPLIES 86613 20So00 ((( 86616 - 96419 MONTHLY ELECTRIC BILLS m 66420 MONTHLY COMPUTER CONTRACT 86421 REHA8 PROGRAM 8642Z OFFICE SUPPLIES 86423 6USZNESS LICENSE REFUNDS 86424 PLANNING COMMISSION NORKSHOP 86625 YOUTH PROGRAM ~ DAY CAMP SUPPL 8 866Z6 MAINT SUPPLIES 86627 ALARM SERVIC~ 86628 VEHICLE NAZNT SUPPLIES/SERVICE 86429 iNSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 86430 6USZNESS LICENSE REFUNDS 86431 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 86432 POCKET GUIDE 86633 POCKET GUIDE 66436 UNP SERVICES I 66635 COMOEX MEETING 86436 6US[NESS LICENSE REFUNDS 86437 OFFICE SUPPLIES I 86438 ((( 86439 - 86437 LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES 86438 1432 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 6,359.64 397 SOUTHERN DATA SYSTEMS 575.00 40.00 4125 SPENCER ~ ASSOCIATES 260°79 3496 STAPLES 23.08 860Z STOP N GO MARKET 8674 53o16 7745 SUBMAY 152,62 Z364 TARGET Ze.OZ 836 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS 245°60 4116 TAYLOR-DUNN 532°63 3733 TDM MORLD CONVERSIONS, LTD. tar. SO Z718 TERRY, DONNA 69,00 8603 THRIFTY PAYLESS, INC. 286°00 3187 THROCKMORTON, MARCELA SS.OO 2737 ~.C. REGENTS 55.00 2137 U.C. REGENTS 2,195.50 2958 UMPS ARE US ASSOCIATION 2131 UNIGLOBE REGENCY TRAVEL t29o00 8606 VAN AKEN INTERNATIONAL 17.50 342Z VIKING OFFICE PRODUCTS /34°45 3121 VILLAGE NURSERIES 122.35 CITY OF RANCHO CUCANQNGA LIST OF MARRANTS FOR PERZOOS 05-11-94 C93/943 RUN DATE: 05111194 PAGE: 4 VENDOR NAME ZTEN DESCRIPTION MARR NO WARRo AHT. 499 VISION SERVICE PLAN - (CA) 6T8 WARREN & COo. CARL 213 WAXZEt KLEEN-LZNE CORP 267 WESTERN ROCK CO 4233 MHZCKSONe DZANNE 345 WMITNET MACHINERY 4184 ~ZLLIANSQN C SCNNID 758 uITS 872 WZTTERt ~OANNE 2166 NORLAND9 CHRZS SOe XEROX CORPORATION 348 ZEP MANUFACTURING CONPANT I, CHECKI OVERLAP MONTHLY VISION SERVICE BILLING LZATZLZTY CLAZHS NAINT SUPPLIES ASPHALT & CONCRETE LUNCH TIME CONCERTS MAINT SUPPLIES ENGINEER/NO SERVICES RECREACTION SUPPLIES INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT RECREATION REFUNDS COPY MACHINE SUPPLZESISERVZCE VEHICLE NAINT SUPPLIES 86639 69041oT6 86440 19551o90 86441 29.5T 86442 411o02 864Je3 300.00 86464 68.07 86465 119756.86 86646 T7,81 86467 412.50 86448 32.29 86449 6933T.05 86450 313.86 aPe TOTAL 2429666.72 C[TY OF RANCHO CUCAM' LIST OF MARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 05-18-94 (93/94) RUN OATE: 05/18/94 PAGE: VENDOR NAME XTEN DESCRXPTXON NARR NO MARR. AHT. 6235 CAPPQ 1040 BAKER, OUANE Z2573 NATIONAL DAY OF PRAYER XZSTZ'B.F.C.S. LTO. 3901 3-D CARPET L DRAPERY I A L A EQUXPNENT RENTALS CO., XNC. 2543 A-1 EQUIPMENT SALES, XNC. Z626 AXRTOUCH CELLULAR 4237 ALL OATA SERVICES 264 ALPHA BETA 310 ARRQM TRUCK BOOZES L EQUIP XNC 4210 ASI ENERGY CONSERVATION TECH. 2616 AUTO PARTS COMPANY, ZNC 4229 BACXCH, PATRICK 6Z BANK OF ANERICA NATIONAL TRUST AND 1331 BIG A AUTO PARTS 6257 DLANCHARO, BILLIE 3583 BLANKS 6251 8RONN, JENNA 6264 8USTOS, ALLEN Ro 2171 CAL POLT POMONA 937 CALCONP INC. 68 CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SERVICE 6259 CHAPARRO, RANOY 6260 CHESS, GLEN 488 CHEVRON U S A, ZNC 3118 CHXNO HILLS TRANSNXSSXON 4Z43 CHOICE NXNOOM TINTING 73 ClTRUS MOTORS ONTARIO, XNC. 74 CITY RENTALS 6Z56 COHEN, HITCHELL Z4TO COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY 2190 COLUMUZA CASCAOE C/O NAKEFIELO 2692 COHPUSERVE, INCORPORATEO 826 COHPUTERVISION CORPORATION Z051 COUNTRY ESTATE FENCE CO., INC. 284 OAXSY MHEEL RXBBON COe XNC 2110 DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES 902 DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION 839 DIETERICH INTERNATIONAL TRUCK Z74 DXETZ TONING 3779 DORNING, GLENN 640 ORESCO REPRODUCTIONS SZ3 EASTMAN, XNC 6Z61 EONARDS, MICHAEL ZESI ELLIS, JANA 6262 ERXCK$ON, SONYA [2SS2 FE'AX, MARY CAPPO NEETXNG REZMBURSE FOR CXTY NOR HTG RECREATXON REFUND RECREATION REFUND PROFESSIONAL SERVICES VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES CELLULAR PHONE BILLINGS SUBSCRIPTIONS RECREATION SUPPLXES MAXNTENANCE SUPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES VEHICLE NAXNTENANCE SUPPLIES PROFESSXONAL SERVXCES LEASE PAYMENT VEHICLE MAINTENANCE RECREATION REFUND OFFICE SUPPLIES RECREATION REFUND REFUND HOP PERHIT ECONOMIC ROUNOTABLE MONTHLY SERVICE HAINTENANCE SUPPLIES RECREATION REFUND RECREATION REFUNO GASOLINE CHARGES VEHICLE MAINTENANCE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES EQUZPHENT RENTAL/SUPPLIES RECREATIOel REFUND VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES MONTHLY SERVICE HONTHLY HAZNTENANCE SERVICE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES/REPAIRS OFFICE SUPPLIES BICYCLE LICENSE TRAFFIC SIGNAL NAXNTENANCE VEHICLE NAXNTENANCE VEHXCLE TONING MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES OFFXCE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES RECREATION REFUND REIN8 FOR BUS. RELATED EXPENSE RECREATXON REFUND RECREATION REFUNO · , CHECK8 OVERLAP 66168, 50.00- 86169- 86650 86451, Z8.36 86452- 66452 86453, 115.00 86454, 3,505o98 8645S- 86456 86457 1,390.00 I 86458 450.64 86459 302.73 I 86460 665.14 86461 201.24 86662 38.32 86463 35.56 864,64 2e990.00 86665 9.ZI 86~66 225.00 86467 59,010.51 86468 169.26 86669 18.00 86470 58.30 86471 40.00 86472 53.00 86473 IS.OO I 86476 302.00 86475 89.60 86676 52.00 86477 40.00 86478 77.34 I 8647~ 4,047.62 86680 65.00 I 86481 ; 86482 489.09 86483 75.00 # 86484 771.75 86485 2,627.05 86486 10,00 86487 2,996.54 86488 461.00 86489 89.43 86490 140.00 86491 5,072.55 I 86492 86.68 86493 105.00 86496 6.51 86495 52.35 I 86496 999.29 86497 22.50 86498 57.60 86499 36.00 86500 S2.OO U It II II N II U CITY OF RANCHO CUCANQNGA LIST OF MARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 05-18-94 (93/943 RUN DATE: 05/18/94 PAGE: 2 VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION NARR NO NARRo ANT. CHECK· OVERLAP XZ5 FZRST AMERICAN TITLE ZN$o CO. PROPERTY PROFILE 86501 25.00 2397 FZRST SQLUTXONS COMPUTER SUPPLXES/RENTAL 86502 269.38 6255 FORECAST GROUPt THE L.Po BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 86503 1T2.92 6256 GZLKEYt JOANNE BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 86504 35.00 746 GREAT NESTERR SAVINGS DEFERRED CQNP 86505 5,3Z7o00 IBOO GRXFFXTH RADIATOR SALES VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 86506 97.50 6263 GRZFFXTNw NANCY RECREATZQN REFUND 86507 5.50 X3T GTE CALiFORNiA MONTHLY TELEPHONE BILLINGS e 86508 542.33 22558 HAXREw LYNDA RECREATION REFUND 86509 35.00 4196 HANSON OFFICE PRODUCTS OFFICE SUPPLIES 86510 126.69 3634 HOUSE OF RUTH 93/94 CDBG CONTRACT 865X1 565°00 495 HYDRQ-SCAPE PRODUCTS. ZNC LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES · 86512 60°64 103 I C M A RETIREMENT TRUST-457 OEFERRED CONP 86513 leEZ3.00 4118 I O BURR MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 86514 11.31 416Z X,8, LXTNO RECREATION SUPPLIES # 86515 1w723.00 4247 ILLUMINATING ENGINEERING SOCIETY REiMBURSEMENT/GIFT CERTIFICATE 86516 IBO.O0 66 INDUSTRIAL ASPHALT MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I 865ZT Ie388o24 907 INLAND MEDIATION BOARD LANDLORD/TENANT OXSPUTE I 865Z8 10035.87 129 INSTITUTE Of TRANSPORATXON TRAFFIC ENG TECHS MEETING 86519 30.00 612 JAESCHKE INCet CwR. VEHICLE MAINTENANCE e 86520 86.07 609 KAMXNE, STEXNER & UNGERER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 86521 Z,841.T5 lESS7 KNXGHTe JASON RECREATION REFUND 86522 16.00 1218 KNOX MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I 86523 687.29 4242 LAXDLA~ TRANSIT TRANSPORTATION SERVICES 86524 298e16 12555 LAMBDINe SANQRA RECREATION REFUND 86525 Z5.OO 069 LAWSON PROOUCTSw XNCo NAZNTENANCE SUPPLIES 86526 261.40 I2455 LEE, NARGUERZTE RECREATZON REFUND 86527 6.00 iBiS LONG'S ORUGS FXLN PROCESSING 86528 25°84 12554 LOUGHRANw CHRXS RECREATION REFUND 86529 IZ,SO ~25S3 LOUGHRANt JXN RECREATION REFUND 86530 ZZeSO 386 LYON COot ~ZLLXAN REFUNDABLE DEPOSITS I 8653I 5eOOO.OO 4244 NAXNTENANCE SUPERINTENDENTS ASSOCo M.SoA. MEETING 86532 iZO.O0 76 NARKNANeARCZTNSKZeHANSONwL KING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES # 86533 ZOeXT3o32 3907 MASTER-SORT. iNC. PRESORT NAIL SERVICES 86534 123.T8 X2473 MERCURY INSURANCE / HERRING CLAIM SETTLEMENT 86535 Ze4ZB.7O 6241 NONTEBELLOe CITY OF MAINTENANCE 86536 202.00 Z2456 NORDANe GLORIA RECREATION REFUND 66537 6.00 4IZ N 8 X MAINTENANCE CONTRACT 86538 ~326.00 iEZI N R P A NRPA MEETING REGXSTRATZOH 86539 13.00 1228 N R P A NRPA FlEETiNG REGISTRATION 86540 60,00 2240 NAPA AUTO PARTS VEHZCLE MAINTENANCE I 86541 296.60 3437 NATIONAL UNIFORM SERVICE UNIFORM SERVICES 8 66542 378.86 4034 NXCHOLSe FRED INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT · 86563 ITIET7 I2556 NUNN, KYLZE RECREATION REFUND 86566 25.00 Z2550 O'CONNOR, CASEY RECREATION REFUND I 86565 38.00 3632 OLOTXNERS FOUNDATION OLDTiMERS FOUNDATION 86566 93X.29 ZZSSX ONLORe ANT RECREATION REFUND 86567 19.OO 232 OMNXTRANS 8US PASSES 86568 439e50 2984 PACIFIC SAFETY MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I 86569 749.06 828 PARAGON BUILDING PRODUCTS INC. CONCRETE SUPPLIES e 86550 Z3X.46 ZZSBX PATELw VISHNU REFUND OF DRAINAGE FEES 8655Z 8e030oOO U I) I; · · · · · · t I I I · · · · · CITY OF RANCHO CUCANb. ~ LIST OF HARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 05-18-94 (93/963 RUN DATES 05/18/96 PAGE: 3 VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION NARR NO NARR. AMY. 12561 PATEL, VISHNU 12559 PERKINS, JENNIFER 2587 PETERSONw LILLZ 2987 PNOENZX GROUP INFORMATION SYSTEMS 1069 POMONA VALLEY KANASAKI 12560 PONELL, BETTY 12562 PREMIER GROUP. PGZ 38 65 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 6025 R J SUPPLY 959 RADIO SHACK ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE 12564 RATHFONe AHOY 626 RAUL P. ROBLESe SR. 276 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 12565 ROJOe GENEVIEVE ZZS63 ROULE, SHELLY 1298 SAN BERN CO ASSESSQR°S OFFICE 581 SAN 8ERNAROINO COUNTY 132 SAN DIEGO ROTARY BROOM COw THe 3041 SANCHEZw ALEX 3896 SENECHALe CAL 2507 SIEBE ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLS 1327 SMART L FZNAL 3966 SRXTH COMPANY 317 SO CALXF EDISON CO. 905 SOIL L PLANT LABORATORTe INC. 532 SPAGNOLOe SAN 6192 SPAZNeJReNZLLZAN V. 666 STANDARD INSURANCE 666 STANDARD INSURANCE CO. 1373 STERLING TRUCK EQUIPMENT 12566 STREET, EDA 350 U.S. POSTMASTER 693 U.S./NNITE VAN BATTERY COee INCo 2731 UNZGLOeE REGENCY TRAVEL 2210 VARNET, GARY 1Z569 VASQUE2, JANZE )GZZ VIKING OFFICE PROOUCTS 1103 VISTA PAINT 4Z&8 VOLUME SERVICES 478 NARREN L CO., CARL Z13 NAXZEe KLEEN-LZNE CORP Z67 NESTERN ROCK CO 12571 NILROY, EVELYN 12570 HZLROY, NICMELLE 758 MZTS 371 ZEE MEDICAL SERVXCE 368 ZEP MANUFACTURING COMPANY REFUND OF DRAINAGE FEES RECREATION REFUND MAINTENANCE MONTHLY SERVICE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLZES RECREATION REFUNO RELEASE OF CASH DEPOSIT MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND RECREATION REFUND TIRE REPAIR PRINTS RECREATION REFUND RECREATION REFUND SUBSCRIPTION CAL-ID PROGRAN MAINT SUPPLIES RECREATION REFUND INSTRUCTOR PAYRENT SERVICE/SUPPLIES DAY CAHP SUPPLIES NAXNT SUPPLIES MONTHLY ELECTRIC 8XLLXNGS SOIL TESTING SERVICES CERT INSTRUCTOR C.E.R.T. INSTRUCTOR INSURANCE PRENIUN INSURANCE PREMIUM VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES RECREATION REFUND POSTAGE LANDSCAPE NENSLETTER VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES CONDEX MEETING MINI EQUIPHENT MEETING RECREATION REFUND OFFICE SUPPLIES NAZNT SUPPLIES CATERING SERVICES LIABILITY CLAIMS NAINT SUPPLIES ASPHALT g CONCRETE RECREATION REFUND RECREATION REFUND RECREACTZON SUPPLIES RECREATION SUPPLIES VEHICLE NAZNT SUPPLIES CHECKIll OVERLAP 86552 200.00 86553 20.00 86556 30.00 86555 348.15 86556 3.57 86557 12.00 86558 2.soo.00 I 86559 59.63 I 86560 623,03 86561 52.96 86562 20.60 I 86563 266.89 I 86566 284.10 66565 19.00 86566 39°00 86567 520.00 86568 8.00 86569 66.80 86570 632.00 t 86571 187.50 I 86572 1,360,71 86573 66.88 86574 91.23 I 86575 4,338.61 I 86576 156.00 86577 198.00 86578 125.00 86579 583.20 86580 107.50 86581 671.60 86582 35.00 86583 6,500.00 I 86586 162008 86585 129.00 86586 60.00 86587 2Q.OQ e 86588 96.23 86589 152.86 86590 170.20 86591 18.60 8 86592 861.88 86593 eO.OO 86594 48.00 86595 25.00 86596 75.90 86597 5.98 86598 356e65 TOTAL. 155,306.11 b it t it it it I t l t I it it t t I Ik APPUCATION FOR ALCOHOUC BIVIRAGi LICINSi|S) De Net Write Alpeve Yldl IJle4ee' Heedll~erferl Oilice I. TYPE(S) OF LICENSE(S) FILE NO To: Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control 1901 Broadway Oakland for Riverstdu SocrmNfito, Collf. 95818 The undersigned hereby applies for licenses described as follows: 2. NAME(S) OF APPLICANT(S) LUCKY STORES, IHC. DELAWARE RE('E'PT GEOGRAPH'CAL CODE Dale Issued Tamp. Permit Applied under Sp, c. 24044 [] Effeefice Date: L ,~ U ~ ~'- (J--' Effective Date: 3. TYPE(S) OF TRANSACTION(S) FEE $ raduced fee tr:!Lxsier {2407L :' 3) ]50 LIC. TYPE 21 4. Name of Business Sav-on drugs 5. Location of Business--Number and Street 1]428 Kepyon Way City and Zip Code 9 ] 730 County 6. If ~emil~ Licensed, Show Ty~ of Licen~ 2l , OEf-sa/e Genurai 8. Mailing Address (il diRerenl fr~ S)--Number and Strut BFU ($24 x 3) , RECFj!/~,I GITY OF RAJ~?~J '.'t, .',~4ONGA MAY ~-' 9 1994 171slglmOI ._.~, ;..14~S/eTpTAL 7. Are Premises Inside City Limits? 72 $ 668 2L (tamp) (Pe,m) 6565 :Jtott Ave., ]~uen'~ }"~'F, CA 9(J62fi-l158 9. Have you ever been convicted of a felony? 10. Hove you ever violated any of the provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act or regulations of the Department per- :10 raining to the Act? y~..~ 11. Explain o "YES" answer to items 9 or 10 on an attachment which shall be deemed part of this application. Flea::e bee ~3ttaCh,:c' 12. Applicant agrees (a) Ihal any manager employod in an-sale {icensed premises wilt have all the qualifications of a licensee, and (b) that he will not violate or cause or perroll to ~ vialard any of the provisions ot the Alcoholic ~verage Control Acl. 13. STATE OF CALIFORNIA County af .... 'LJ__'EJiql ..':'::..=," 7' |4. APPLICANT" S,ON __;/ ........................................................... ........................................ ~ ................................................................... IlmI~LI(:ATION BY TRANSFEROR 15. STATE OF CALIFORNIA Coun~ of ......... A[CF'_:~!L ................... Date .... 3P![i__Z&'~__lIQ_4_ ..... 16. Name(s) of Licensee(s) |7, Signature(s) of License(s) 18. License Number(s) -.' 19. Location Number and Sweet City and Zip Code County ])4':," ~:?r,',,.i !7.,. ~., .chr, I:,,,- "' -1 ~'17~' q" "'-' ,'dj ' Do Not Write Below This Line; For Department Ule Only AHached: [~ Recorded notice, ~"V' q¢ [] Fiduciary papers, bi,' r:.^~ '..'il~ b,: totti:i~d. [] ................................................... COPIES MAILED [] Renewal: Fee of ........... Paid at ............................. attica on .................. Receipt No ss ,ec 2,, ,,-e~, 8 LUCKY STORES , Inc. 11428 Kenyon Way Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91701 APJ# 227-011-0~ (Say-on Drugs) Victoria Planned Community Currently Zoned; Village Commerical Zoning of Adjacen= Properties; ~;orth: PPoposed 210 Foothill Freeway and CaPyn Planned Community. South: Medium Residential ~/1~ Du/Ac Victoria Planned Community East: Propesed Community Facility and Medium Residential ~/1~ Du/Ac Victoria Planned Community West: Medium Residential 4/14 Du/Ac Victoria Planned Community rla 5/16/94 9 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: June 1, 1994 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager William J. Alexander, Councilmember APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION NO. 94-* RECOMMENDATION Approve Resolution No. 94-* allowing alternates for the public members of the AB 939 Task Force. Backf round The Solid Waste Advisory Task Force membership approved an action for the County and cities of San Bemardino to allow alternates for the public members of the AB 939 Task Force. This action requires a Resolution of the County and the City Councils with a majority of the population for adoption. The attached Resolution provides for this action. William J. Alexander Councilmember RESOLUTION NO. 94- / D 0 A RESOLUTION OF THE C1TY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING' ALTERNATE MEMBERS FOR THE PUBLIC REPRESENTATIVES OF THE SOLID WASTE ADVISORY TASK FORCE WHEREAS, the County of San Bernardino adopted Resolution No. 90-134 establishing the membership of the Solid Waste Advisory Task Force, as required by Public Resources Code Section 40950 (AB939, stats 1989); and WHEREAS, such membership includes ten (10) representatives from the solid waste industry, environmental organizations, the general public, special districts, and affected governmental agencies appointed by the city and county representatives of the Task Force to status as members of the Task Force. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT: SECTION 1: Approval is hereby given for the ten (10) public members of the Solid Waste Advisory Task Force to have alternates. SECTION 2: Designated alternates shall be appointed as alternate members of the Task Force by action of the city and county representatives of the Task Force. SECTION 3: An alternate must satisfy the same categorical (private waste collector, private recycler, construction industry, environmental organization, etc.) and geographical affiliation as his or her delegate. 11 DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT June 1, 1994 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Brad Buller, City Planner Anthea Hartig, Associate Planner APPROVAL OF LANDMARK DESIGNATION 94-01 - ST- CLARE OF ASSISI - An application to designate the Ernst Mueller House, located at 6563 East Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, as an Historic Landmark - APN: 227-071-17. Staff recon~nends that the City Council approve Landmark Designation 94-01 and thereby designate the Ernst Mueller House as a Historic Landmark- B~OOMD St. Clare of Assisi Church, led by the Reverend Elizabeth Habecker, applied to designate the Mueller House as a local landmark- At their March 9, 1994 meeting, the Historic Preservation Co~nission unanimously approved the forwarding of a recomendation to designate the Mueller House to the City Council (please refer to Exhibit "A," the HPC staff report). The Commission concluded that the home has been a very important part of the historic and agricultural landscape of the Etiwanda co~znunity for 80 years- The impressive Craftsman-style home stands much as it did in 1914 when construction had been completed - surrounded by a citrus grove, windrows, and denoted by a magnificent row of magnolia trees that Ernst Mueller planted when he purchased the property in 1904. Because the site lies adjacent to the planned freeway right-of-way for the Route 30 Extension, architectural historians from Caltrans reviewed the property and determined that the house and site were eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. Respe ully itt , er BB:AH:sp Attachments: Exhibit "A" - HPC Staff Report dated March 9, 1994 Exhibit "B" - Resolution of Approval f DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT March 9, 199~ Chairman and Members of the Historic Preservation Con~nission Brad Buller, City Planner Anthea M. Hartig, Associate Planner LANDMARK DESIGNATION 94-01 - ST. CLAIRE OF ASSISI - A proposal to designate the Ernst Mueller Family Home, a Potential Local Landmark, located at 6563 East Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, as a local Landmark - APN: 227-071-17. The Los Angeles diocese of the Episcopal Church purchased the southeast corner of East and Highland Avenues in order to establish St- Claire of Assisi Church under the vicarship of Rev. Elizabeth Habecker. On this site stands the Mueller family home which is still surrounded by an orange grove and demarcated by a ninety year old row of magnolia trees along East Avenue. Because the site lies adjacent to the planned freeway right-of-way for the Route 30 extension, architectural historians from CalTrans reviewed the property and determined that the house and site were eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places, (see Exhibit HPC-1, the State Historic Resource Survey Form for the results of the State's survey)- St. Claire's has submitted an application for a Conditional Use Permit required to establish a church on this site, as well as this landmark application. If designated, the church would be required to process a Landmark Alteration Permit along with the Conditional Use Permit. SITE LOC. ATI(:M AMD DF, SCI~'I'TIOH ~ Location and Description: The square, relatively flat, 5-acre parcel is located at the southeast corner of East and Highland Avenues in the historic community of Etiwanda. Most of the 5 acres continues to be devoted to citrus cultivation. Site Land Use, Zoning, Specific Plan Designations: Per the Etiwanda Specific Plan the underlying land use of the site is Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre). C $ Surrounding Land Use, Zoning, General Plan/Specific. Plan Designations: Directly to the north of the Mueller house site lies the Route 30 corridor and land to the north of the freeway right-of-way has a land use categorization of Very Low Residential- To the e--~ " southwest of the subject parcel is land denoted by Low use, while land directly west of the site is plann Residential use- HPC STAFF REPORT LD 94-01 - MUELLER HOME March 9, 1994 Page 2 Physical Description of Resource: The large, wood-framed, two-story house faces East Avenue and sits back from that thoroughfare almost 80 feet. A fine example of the Craftsman architectural style, the house exhibits many of the characteristics of Craftsman styling including a multi-gabled roof line, overhanging eaves with exposed rafter tails and projecting purlins with horizontal color ties across the gable ends, and decorative eaves bracketing- Basically symmetrical in fenestration patterning and bay width, the house's west-facing (front) elevation is enlivened by a centered shed-roofed dormer that brings light into the attic. The house rests upon a stone foundation and other decorative and structural uses of stone include the front porch railing, living room fireplace chimney on the south elevation that rises through the porch roof and southern gable overhang, as well as the high stone rail of a recessed porch at the northeast corner of the rear wing. Three lap drop siding sheaths the house, while double hung wood windows with simple surrounds, over clustered in pairs, characterize the fenestration detailing. Heavy landscaping and a citrus grove surround the house; the most notable elements of the landscaping are the row of magnolia trees that were purportedly planted by Ernst Mueller in 1902, the existing eucalyptus windrows, and the pair of mature palms marking the front of the property. Until destroyed by fire in the early 1980s a large barn and series of chicken houses, all original to the property, remained standing. ANALYSIS Historical Background: Ernst Mueller and Katherine Stegmeier were married in 1894 and by 1904 were living in the young Etiwanda community when they purchased the northeast corner of East and Highland Avenues from the Chaffey Brothers. Ernst Mueller was born in Germany in 1868. In 1884, during his seventeenth year, he sailed to America where he worked as a farm laborer in Wisconsin and Minnesota. At the age of 24 he arrived in Etiwanda and in 1892 purchased his first share of Etiwanda Mutual Water Company stock. Katherine Stegmeier was the second child and first girl born to Michael and Katherine Stegmeier in their homeland, Germany. The Ste~meiers sailed to America in 1880 and after living in Los Angeles for a short while also moved to the Chaffey's colony in Etiwanda. The eldest of the Stegmeier children, Jacob, remained in the area and built a home at what is now 7050 Etiwanda Avenue which is also a designated local landmark. Ernst and Katherine Mueller continued to amass and farm citrus acreage, owning at one time over 70 acres in Etiwanda. Their first, modest home was built in 1904 on the northeast corner of Highland and East Avenues- Ten years later, the family including three sons, moved into the newly constructed large Craftsman home across Highland on East Avenue. In 1913, Mr. Mueller had picked his large crop of lemons earlier than most other growers and missed the devastating freeze that ruined most southern HPC STAFF REPORT LD 94-01 - MUELLER HOME March 9, 1994 Page 3 California crops, and thus made a handsome profit that year. It was with some of the proceeds of the 1913 crop that Mr. Mueller purportedly funded the construction of a new home for his family. Another contributing factor in the family's decision to expand their holdings and build a larger, more permanent home was the completion of the Pacific Electric Railway through Etiwanda which meant that local growers no longer had to haul their citrus fruit by wagon to packing houses located along the southerly Santa Fe tracks. The family raised citrus as well as gapes, kept milking cows, and maintained a flock of several thousand laying hens. Very involved inthe Etiwanda community, the family's participation was spearheaded by Ernst Mueller's involvement as first a Director and then President of the Etiwanda Citrus Fruit Association and Katherine Mueller's tenure as President of the Ladies Aid of the Etiwanda Congregational Church from 1933-1957. Two years after celebrating his fiftieth wedding anniversary, Ernst Mueller died in 1946; his wife continued to live in the family home until her death at 97 years of age in 1970. Significance: Historical and Cultural - The Mueller family members were important early settlers to the Etiwanda area and their history reflects both the more micro-patterns of conununity and agricultural and development in turn-of-the-century southern California as well as the macro-, national level of international immigration and settlement trends that were occurring simultaneously. One of the few, if not the only, grove house still surrounded by a citrus grove and related windrows in the Etiwanda townsite, the Mueller house is a very significant contributor to our understanding of the area's rich agricultural past- The row of magnolia trees were said to be a favorite of Hollywood Stars, in particular Mary Pickford, who used branches and perhaps even an entire tree as decorations for her garden parties. Architectural - The Mueller family home stands as one of the finest remaining examples of local expressions of Craftsman styling from the early decades of this century- Environmental Assessment: Landmark designations are except under CEQA per Article 19, Section 15308. FACTS FOR FINDINGS Per Section 2.24.090 of the City's Historic Preservation Ordinance, the following findings are made in support of the designation of the Ernst Mueller Family Home: 15 HPC STAFF REPORT LD 94-01 - MUELLER HOME March 9, 1994 Page 4 Historic and Cultural Significance. Finding: 1. The proposed landmark is particularly representative of an historical period, type, style, region, or way of life. Fact: The Ernst Mueller family homesite reflects superbly the early citricultural development of the Etiwanda area. Finding: 2. The proposed landmark was connected with someone renowned or important or a local personality- Fact: The Mueller and Stegmeier families played key roles in the history of Etiwanda from the 1880s to the 1970s. Finding: 3. The proposed landmark is connected with a business or use which was once common but is now rare. Fact: The citrus industry's presence in this region, complete with related grove houses and landscaping such as the Mueller Home, was once very prominent and commonplace but has declined severely over the past thirty years. Historic Architectural and Engineering Significance. Finding: 1. The overall effect of the design of the proposed landmark is beautiful or its details and materials are beautiful or unusual- Fact: All the major characteristics of the Craftsman style of architectural expression are present in the Mueller home and in the level of detail of the building's design and construction. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting: Finding: 1. The proposed landmark materially benefits the historic character of the neighborhood. Fact: The architectural styling, the grove, and the magnolia trees lend a distinctive beauty to the area and the region. Finding: 2. The proposed landmark in its location represents an established and familiar visual feature of the neighborhood, community, or City. Fact: For ninety years, the Mueller home and groves. and related magnolia trees along East Avenue have been an integral part of the Etiwanda community. HPC STAFF REPORT LD 94-01 - MUELLER HOME March 9, 1994 Page 5 R~O~_~ION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission forward its approval to the City Council to designate the Ernst Mueller Family Home as an Historic Landmark. BB:AH:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "HPC-I" - State Historic Resources Survey Form Exhibit "HPC-2" - Site Map Resolution of Approval 17 l t I I I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ARCHITECTURAL INVENTORY/EVALUATION FORM County - Route - Postmile: SBd 30 0.0/22.8 IDENTIFICATION 1.Common Name: Peffitt House 2.HIstoric Name: Ernst Mueller House 3.Street or rural address: 6563 East Avenue CIty: Rancho Cucamonga (Etiwanda) 4.Parcel Number: 227-071-17 Address: 6563 East Avenue 5.Ownership Is: ( ) Public ( x ) 6.Present Use: Residential MAP REFERENCE NO. 42 ( ) LISTED ( ) DETERMINED ELIGIBLE ( x ) APPEARS ELIGIBLE ( ) APPEARS INELIGIBLE Zip Code: 91739 County: San Bernardino Present Owner: Albert and Nell Pettltt City: Rancho Cucamonga ZIp Code: 91739 Private Original Use: Residential, citrus ranch DESCRIPTION 7a.Archltecture! Style: Craftsman To. Briefly describe the present PHYSICAL CONDITION of the site or structure and describe any major alterations from Its original condition: This large, two-story, wood-frame residence is one of the finest examples of Craftsman architecture in the Etiwanda area. It was built in 1914 for a prominent local citrus grower, Emst Mueller, and his family. It rests upon a stone or stone- faced foundation; the plan is roughly square, with a side-gabled front section and a cross-<Jabled extension at the rear. The dining room and an upstairs bedrcom are housed in a small wing which projects from the east haft of the south elevation and is capped by a medium gable with detailing which rapoats that of the main gable. The medium-gabled roof has wide, overhanging saves with exposed rafter ends on the sides and projecting pudins with open braces and collar ties in the gable ends. The house is sheathed in a three-lap drop siding. The facade, which faces west, is symmetrical in composition. with the symmetry broken only by a porch which wraps around the southwest corner;, the porch ha a stone railing with concrete o~o. The porch roof is a combination shed and g~Dle, and is supported by piers oft the south side. Centered over the entrlnce is a front-gabled porch with expressed structure and supports rising from stone piers; four concrete steps ass the front porch from the walkway which leads from the street in front. The main entrance is flanked by tri-partite, double-hung windows with simple surrounds. The second story windows are !~ired, and flank a small, centrally placed window over the entrance. The attic is lighted by a shed- roofed dormer in the center of the west-facing roof slope. Other stonework includes the living room fireplace chimney on the south which rim through the porch roof and southern gable overhang, and the high stone rail of a recessed porch at the northeast comer in the rear wing. The interior of the house is virtually unaltered, featuring a stone fireplace in the living room and original woodwork throughout; only the kitchen has been remodeled. (CONTINUED) 8. ConstRuction date bUmsted: ( ) Factual: (1914) 9. Architect: UnknowTt 10. Builder: Unknown 11. AN)fox. property else(in feet) Frontage: 530' Depth: 660' 12. Date(i) of eftclosed photograph(s): January 27, 1989 13.Condition: Excellent (x) Good ( ) Fair( ) Deteriorated( ) 14.Alterltlone: Loss of early barn and chicken houses, remodeling of kitchen, recent subdivision of property 15.Surroundings: (Check more than one if necessary) Open land ( ) Scattered buildings ( x ) Densely built-up ( Residential ( x ) Industrial ( ) Commercial ( ) Other: Citrus grove 16.Threats to site: None known ( ) Private Development ( ) Zoning ( ) Vandalism ( ) Public Works Project ( x ) Other: 17.1s the structure: On its original site? ( x ) Moved? ( ) Unknown? ( ) 18.Rallied features: citrus grove, row of magnolia trees, several later outbuildings SIGNIRCANCE 19.Brlefly state historical and/or architectural Importance (Include dates, events, and persons associated with the site): This large Craftsman house was built by a prominent local citrus grower in 1914. Ernst Mueller, bom in Germany in 1864, immigrated to the United States in 1864. He lived in Wisconsin and Minnesota before arriving in Etiwanda about 1892. He met Katherine Stegmeier, also born in Germany, whose family arrive in the United Sites in 1880; the Stegmeiers had settled in Los Angeles pdor to their reiocation to Etiwanda. They were married in 1894. The Muellers had three sons and a daughter who died as a child. (CONTINUED) 20.Main thetoo of the historic relource: is checked, number in order of importance.) (ff more than one I.{Nmtl~n ske~h mep (draw & label site and surrounding sireels, roads, and prominent ledmarks): See Map 3 Architecture ( x ) Arts & Leisure ( ) Economic/Industrial ( ) ExpioratiorVSsttlement Government ( ) Military ( ) Religion ( ) Social/Education ( ) ( ) 21.Sources (List books, documents, surveys, personal interviews and their dates.) Ftiwanda. The First 100 Years. Etiwanda Historical Society, 1982; A History of Ftiwenda. by Robed L Hickcox, 1981, pp. 94-95, 237 (MS copy in City of Rancho Cucamongs Planning Department historical survey files). 'Designated and Potential Histofici Site List", City of Rancho Cucamonga, March 1988; City historic,,ai survey property file for 6563 Eat Avenue, Planning Department, City of Rancho Cucamonga; Fairchild Aerial Photo C4~leclion, Whittier College (Photos C-4061-15, 1936; C-5042-19, 3/13/1938); interview, Abert and Nell Psttitt, owners, January 27, 1989. 22,0ate form prepared: February 1, 1989 By: Aaron A. Illup Organlzetln: Caltrans Addreel: 1120 N Street City: Sacramento Zip Code: 95814 Phone: (916)920-7672 19 CONTINUATION SHEET MAP REFERENCE NO. 42 7b. Brlafly describe the present PHYSICAL CONDITION of the sits or structure and describe any major siteration8 from Its original condition: The house is sat back from the street, surrounded by heaving landscaping and a citrus grove. Other property features a row of old magnolia tree along East Avenue north of the house, and several small outbuildings. Chicken houses and a large bern also occupied the property, but were destroyed by fire early in the 1980s. Several sheds, which appear to be relatively recent in construction, are located just north and east of the house. 19.Briefly state historical end/or architectural Importance (Include dates, events, end persons associated with the site): County Assessor's Lot Books show Mueller purchased the subject property in 1902; he bought the property at the northeast comer of East and Highland Avenues in 1904, where he built the family's first house. He is also said to have planted the row of magnolia trees on East Avenue that same year. The family moved into their new house in 1914; although a severe freeze in 1913 devastated the citrus industry in southern California, Mueller is said to picked his lemon crop prior to the disaster, and built his house from the proceeds of that year's crop. He was an active promoter of the local citrus industry, having sewed for a number of years on the board of directors of the Etiwanda Citrus Fruit Associmion, and was its president at the time this house was built. Other members of the family were also quite active in local chumh and community elfaim. Emat Mualler died in 1946, and his wife continued to live in the house until her death in 1970. The current owners purchased the property from the Mueller family in 1975. The Mueller house is an excellent local example of early 20th century Craftsman styling. It is one of the finest examples of its type and period in the local community and has retained an unusually high level of integrity. Although a portion of the surrounding citrus acreage has been subdivided for residential development, the house and its remaining citrus acreage still retain the feel of an early citrus ranch, a type of property now virtually extinct in the rapidly-developing City of Rancbo Cucamonga, of which Etiwanda is now a pen. In addition, it is directly associated with a prominent local citrus grower, whose personal contributions, as well as those of his family, were important to the history of the local community. The property appears to meet National Register cdteda B and C at the local level of significance. Map Reference No. 42 ,_:;~: _..~;,5= ~ · ,. .. ...-.'~..~ Ernst Mueller House, 6563 East Avenue Front elevation Side and rear elevation, looking southwest Map Reference No. 42 Ernst Mueller House, 6563 East Avenue South elevation 6/O / /,,Z TITLE: bD q4-- ~>/ EXHIBIT: Z, SCALE: RESOLUTION NO. 94-02 A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF HISTORIC LANDMARK 94-01 TO DESIGNATE THE ERNST MUELLER FAMILY HOME, CITRUS GROVE, WINDROWS, AND MAGNOLIA TREES, LOCATED AT 6563 EAST AVENUE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AS A LANDMARK - APN: 227-071-17. A. Recitals. 1. St. Clare of Assisi Episcopal Church has filed an application for a Landmark as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Landmark is referred to as "the application." 2. On March 9, 1994, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 3. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Historic Preservation of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part "A," of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. The application applies to approximately 5 acres of land, basically a square configuration, located at the southeast corner of Highland and East Avenues. 3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on March 9, 1994, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, and pursuant to Section 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, this Commission hereby makes the following findings and facts: A. Historical and Cultural Significance: Finding: 1. The proposed Landmark is particularly representative of an historic period, type, style, region, or way of life. Fact: The Ernst Mueller family homesite reflects superbly the early citricultural development of the Etiwanda area. Finding: 2. The proposed landmark was connected with someone renowned or important or a local personality. Fact: The Mueller and Stegmeier families played key roles in the history of Etiwanda from the 1880s to the 1970s. HPC RESOLUTION NO. 94-02 LD 94-01 - MUELLER HOME March 9, 1994 Page 2 Finding: 3. The proposed landmark is connected with a business or use which was once common but is now rare. Fact: The citrus industry's presence in this region, complete with related grove houses and landscaping such as the Mueller Home, was once very prominent and commonplace but has declined severely over the past thirty years. B. Historic Architectural and Engineering Significance. Finding: 1. The overall effect of the design of the proposed landmark is beautiful, or its details and materials are beautiful or unusual. Fact: All the major characteristics of the Craftsman style of architectural expression are present in the Mueller home and in the level of detail of the building's design and construction. C. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting: Finding: 1. The proposed landmark materially benefits the historic characner of the neighborhood. Fact: The architectural styling, the grove, and the magnolia trees lend a distinctive beauty to the area and the region. Finding: 2. The proposed landmark in its location represents an established and familiar visual feature of the neighborhood, community, or City. Fact: For ninety years, the Mueller home and groves and related magnolia trees along East Avenue have been an integral part of the Etiwanda community. 4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and determines it to be exempt per Article 19, Section 15308. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby resolves that pursuant to Chapter 2.24 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, that the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 9th day of March 1994, of Landmark Application. 6. The Chairman of this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. HPC RESOLUTION NO. 94-S2 LD 94-01 - MUELLER HOME March 9, 1994 Page 3 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF MARCH 1994. HISTORI PRE TION COMMISS~ N OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ATTEST: I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Mistoric Preservation Co~Mniesion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission held on the 9th day of March 1994, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARKER, LUMPP, MELCHER, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: MCNIEL A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION 94-01, THEREBY DESIGNATING THE ERNST MUELLER HOUSE, LOCATED AT 656 3 EAST AVENUE , AS A HISTORIC LANDMARK AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227-071-17. WHEREAS, St. Clare of Assisi Episcopal Church has filed an application for Landmark Designation 94-01, as described in the title of this Resolution- Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Landmark Designation is referred to as the "application." WHEREAS, on March 9, 1994, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and, following the conclusion of said public hearing, adopted Resolution No. 94-02, thereby recommending to this City Council that said application be approved. WHEREAS, on June 1, 1994, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date. WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find, determine, and resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The application applies to property located at Assessor Parcel N~,m~er: 227-071-17; Legal Description: Etiwanda Colony Lands W 1/2 Lot 4 BLK G 5 AC. SECTION 2: One of the few, if not the only, grove house still surrounded by a citrus grove in the Etiwanda townsite, the Mueller House is a very significant contributor to our understanding of the area's rich agricultural past. The proposed landmark meets the following criteria established in Chapter 2.24,090 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code: A. Historical and Cultural Significance: The proposed landmark is particularly representative of a historical period, type, style, region, or way of life. The proposed landmark is an example of a type of building which was once common but is now rare. CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. LD 94-01 - ERNST MUELLER HOUSE (ST- CLARE OF ASSISI CHURCH) June 1, 1994 Page 2 The proposed landmark was connected with someone renowned, important, or a local personality- The proposed landmark is connected with a business or use which was once common but is now rare- 5. The architect or builder was important. B. Historic Architectural and Engineering Significance. The overall effect of the design of the proposed landmark is beautiful, or its details and materials are beautiful or unusual. C. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting: The proposed landmark materially benefits the historic character of the neighborhood. The proposed landmark, in its location, represents an established and familiar visual feature of the neighborhood, community, and City (Ord. 70 S9, 1979). SECTION 3: Designation of a landmark is exempt from CEQA (Article 19, Section 15308). SECTION 4: Based on the substantial evidence received and reviewed by this Council and based on the findings set forth above, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga approves the designation of the Ernst Mueller House, Landmark Designation 94-0~, as a Historic Landmark and that the City Clerk shall forward a certified copy of this Resolution to the County Recorder within 90 days of its passage· DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT June 1, 1994 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack L_am, AICP, City Manager Robert Dominguez, Aclmirdstrative Services Director Ingrid Y. Blair, GIS/Special Districts Supervisor APPROVAL TO DECLARE ALL MONIES REMAINING IN THE IMPROVEMENT FUND FOR ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 89-1 (MHJ,IKEN, SOUTH OF ARROW) AS SURPLUS Recommendation Staff recommends that City Council approve the declaring of all monies remaining in the improvement fund in Assessment District No. 89-1 (Milliken, South of Arrow) as SURPLUS and use said funds to lower the fiscal year 1994/95 annual assessments for each parcel. BackeTound/Analysis The City formed Assessment District No. 89-1 on behalf of RCDC Associates (the Developer). The improvements were done by the Developer before the City acquired them. On December 18, 1991, the City entered into an agreement with Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company (Ro__ilroad) for the construction of the grade crossing at Jersey Boulevard with the prior agreement that the Developer was liable for all costs associated with the construction. After the bonds were sold, the City retained money from the bend proceeds for the construction costs and faithful performance bonds. The grade crossing has been completed, the Railroad has been paid and the faithful performance bonds returned to the Developer. However, there are additional funds remaining and the Developer has requested that the City utilize said funds to reduce the fiscal year 1994/95 annual assessments for each parcel within the district. This reduction totals $127,921 and is for fiscal year 1994/95 only, as the construction fund would be completely depleted. _/ CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT APPROVAL TO DECLARE REMAINING IMPROVEMENT FUNDS June 1, 1994 Page 2 Staff feels comfortable in doing this because the benefits derived here are all attributable to the property owners and there are still eighteen more years left to pay off this debt. Additionally, equitable amounts for each parcel can be calculated based on the parcels respective acres. Respectfully submitted, ' ~rt 'n ez Admlnistrati~e ne~ur~'ces Director RCD:IYB:de Attachment: Resolution WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the. CITY OF RANC}~ ~, CALIFORNIA, has conducted proceedings and ccmpleted installation for certain works of imp~uve~'~nt in a special assessment district pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Municipal Imp~o-~rent Act of 1913", being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California; said special assessment district known and designated as ~ DISTRICT NO. 89-1 (hereinaf~ter referred to as the "Assessment District"); WHEREAS, after ccmpletion of the improverents and payment or setting aside of funds for all of the claims frc~ the Imp~ov~,~t Fund for said Assessment District, there ~-~m~ins a surplus in the Imp~u~{m~,it Fund, and this legislative body is des/mous at this time to makB the disposition of said surplus as so provided by Section 10427 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. N~W, TrnueaORE, tba City Ccuncil of the City of Rancho Cucaronga does hezBby resolve as follows: SECTIC~ 1. That the above recitals are all true and co,'~ct. SECTION 2. That the ~rks of ~t, as set forth and described in the Resolution of Intention for these prcceedinc3s, ha~e been ccmpleted to the satisfaction of this legislative body, and all payment has either been made or set aside for all existing or potential claims, costs and expenses. SECTIC~ 3. Prior to any distr//mtion as set forth above, the lesser amount of $1,000 or five percent (5%) of the amounts experrbd f~u,L the Improvemint Fund sb~l 1 be transf~ to tam General Fund of the City. SECTION 4. That all other surplus monies, at this time ~in/ng in the Impruv~ent Fund, shall be applied as a credit or payment to prc~ owners within the bouDa~ries of the Assesintent District on a pro-rata basis generally deteunined as follows: A. TO those who paid in cash, the proportionate share of the surplus sb~]l be ret%un~d in cash to the person or persons who made the payment, upon satisfactory evidence being available that said person made the original pa~t or discharge; B. Where any part of an indivicb,~] assessment ~ins unpaid and is payable in Lnstallzents, the amount apportioned to each parcel shall be credited against the next installment or installments unpaid. That all credits or payments shall be made in the manner and form as authorized by Section 10427.1 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. 31 SECTION 5. That the Treasurer shall determine t~a pro-rata amount each assessment is entitled to receive based on the re~aining 1994. day of , MayDr City Clerk I, DEBRA J. RaAM~, CITY CvA~K of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, ~, am~ adopu~ by the City Council of the City of ~a~ho Cucamonga, C~]ifornia, at a regular meet/rig of said City Council held on the day of , 1994. Executed this __ day of , 1994. Dehra J. A~Mmus, City Clerk CITY OF RANCH0 CUCAMONGA DATE: June 1, 1994 TOt. Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager FROM: Duane A. Baker, Assistant to the City Manager SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING PREPAYMENT FORMULA FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 88-2 Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution specifying conditions for the prepayment of taxes within Community Facilities District 88-2. STAFF REPORT Background: On July 19, 1989, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 397 which established the levy of special taxes in Community facilities District 88-2 to pay for storm drains, flood control and other public improvements. The District is preparing to issue bonds to acquire the public improvements. Pan of this process is to establish the mechanism by which property owners can prepay their tax obligation to the District. The attached resolution establishes the formula for prepayment. This formula is used to insure that the prepayment is the actual fair share of the debt burden of the District. This is done to insure that the District will be able to meet its long term financial obligations to the bond holders. For the above reasons, staff is recommending adoption of the attached resolution. ~u~~e A. Baker Assistant to the City Manager /dab RESO .UnO..0. f5j' / 0-5 RESOLUTION OF THE ! OF THE I, CALIFORNIA, SPECIFYING CONDITIONS FOR THE PREPAYMENT OF SPECIAL TAXES WITHIN tCOHHUNITY FACI- LITIES DISTRICT ~-Z . WHEREAS, the I of the l, CALIFORNIA, has previously undertaken proceedings and formed a .Community Facilities District pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Hello-RoDs Community Facilities Act of Ig82", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California (the "Act"). This · Conmnunity Facilities District is designated as COMMUNITY FACILITIES OISTRICT (hereinafter referred to as the "D(strict"); and, WHEREAS following approval by the qua l!ctors of the District, the legisla- tive body did enact Ordinance No. authorizing the levy of a special tax, as further described therein, within the District; and, WHEREAS, this Board now desires to specify conditions under which the obligation to pay said special tax may be prepaid and premanently satisfied. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS= SECTION 1. That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. That this legislative body does hereby establish the conditions for th special obligation follows: prepayment and satisfaction of e tax as The special tax may be prepaid and permanently satisfied at any time upon the~imyment to the District of the present value of said special tax ob gation as of the date of prepayment as set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. B. Special taxes shall only be authorized for early ayment and discharge of special taxes when the property is in t~e category designated as Final Land Use, and no prepayments can be made prior to that time unless it is determined that the amount of prepayment than what wou d be and discharge is equal to and/or greater 1 required for the land in a Final Land Use taxing category. Refunds would be available in any case of a subsequent overcharge of any prepayment mount. C. No prepayment is authorized for special taxes levied to pay for any services as authorized, if applicable. SECTION 3. APPROVED and ADOPTED this That this legislative body may annually review the discount rate utilized to determine the present value of the special tax obligation set forth in Exhibit "A" hereto, and may modify said discount rate and Exhibit "A" hereto if this legislative body determines that said calcu arson o a more modified discount rate would result in the 1 f then accurate present value for said special tax obligation· day of , lggl. 2~J= EXHIBIT "A" Prepayment of Special Taxes The Special Tax imposed on any parcel in the District may be prepaid in full on any Interest Payment Date (the "Prepayment Dam") by payment of an mount as determined by the District according to the Prepayment Formula. The Prepayment Formula is defined as follows: P -- PVT+CT-RFC + F; The variables are described as follows: P - Prepayment Amount PVT - Present Value of Taxes CT - Current Taxes RFC - Reserve Fund Credit F - Prepayment Fees "Present Value of Taxes" means the present value as of the Prepayment Date of any unpaid portion of the Maximum Special Tax applicable to the subject pan:el in each fiscal year subsequent to the fiscal year in which the calculation is made remaining until the maturity of the Bonds, using the tax yield on the Bonds (as such term is defined in the non-arbitrage certificate of the District) as the discount rate. The Maximum Special Tax as used in such calculation shall be determined in accordance with the Special Tax Formula based on assignment of the subject parcel to the appropriate land use category identified in the Special Tax Formula. The Maximum Special Tax applicable to such parcel shall be the maximum tax applicable to the parcel according to its taxing classification as established in the Special Tax Formula. "Current Year Taxes" means the Special Taxes due with respect to the subject property for the current fiscal year. "Reserve Fund Credit" shall be calculated as a reduction in the Reserve Fund proportional to the principal amount of Bonds to be redeemed pursuant to the Present Value of Taxes determined above, provided that the Reserve Fund Credit shall be applicable only if the Reserve Fund equals the Reserve Requirement at the Prepayment Date. "Prepayment Fees" shall mean the sum of (i) the fees of the District the Paying Agent and any consultants retained by the Dis~ct in connection with the prepayment calculation and Bond redemption and (ii) through September 1, 2003, a prepayment redemption premium of 3% of the Present Value of Taxes net of the Reserve Fund Credit, thereafter such redemption premium shall correspond to the redemption prices calculated for the optional redemption of Bonds. In addition to the above, any property owner prepaying his or her Special Taxes must also pay all delinquent Special Taxes, interest and penalties owing on the parcel on which the payment is being made, if any. The District will rebate to the property owner any Special Taxes received subsequent to the Prepayment Date with respect to Special Ta.xes levied and paid for the current fiscal year for the subject parcel. DATE: TO: FROM: BY SUBJECT: June 1, 1994 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager CITY OF RANCH0 CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Shelley Maddox, Engineering Aide RELEASE OF CASH DEPOSIT AND A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND AGREEMENT FOR 8762 VINMAR STREET, LOCATED SOUTH OF 9TH STREET, EAST OF GROVE AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY VINCENT MARTINEZ RECOItqENDATION It is reconmnended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution releasing the cash deposit and the Real Property Improvement Contract and Agreement and authorizing the Mayor to sign said release and the City Clerk to forward it to the Recorder. BA~K GROU ND/ANALY SIS A Real Property Improvement Contract and Agreement was approved by the City Council on August 18, 1993 for missing off-site street improvements along the Vinmar Street frontage of the property. A cash deposit of $5,000 was accepted as security. A City Capital Improvement Project, Vinmar Avenue Street Improvements from 9th Street to Chaffee Street Alley, is constructing full street improvements on this property's side of the street. Therefore, the cash deposit and agreement are no longer required and staff recommends they be released. Respectfull ubmitte~~.Z~ William J.~ City Engineer WjO:SM:dlw Attachments RESOLUTION .0. ;//- / 0 '7/ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RELEASING A CASH DEPOSIT AND A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND AGREEMENT FROM 8762 VINMAR STREET WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga accepted a cash deposit and Real Property Improvement Contract and Agreement on August 18, 1993; and WHEREAS, said Real Property Improvement Contract and Agreement was recorded in Official Records of San Bernardino County, California, on November 8, 1993, as Document No. 93-482270; and WHEREAS, said cash deposit and Real Property Contract and Agreement are no longer required due to installation of the required improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby release said cash deposit and Real Property Improvement Contract and Agreement and that the City Clerk shall cause Release of Contract to be recorded in the office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California f DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA June 1, 1994 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager STAFF REPORT Suzanne Ota, Community Services Manager APPROVAL TO EXECUTE A JOINT USE AGREEMENT WITH RANCHO CUCAMONGA HIGH SCHOOL FOR GRADUATION CEREMONIES AT THE ADULT SPORTS COMPLEX STADIUM AND FOR CITY USE OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HIGH SCHOOL GYMNASIUM FOR YOUTH BASKETBALL PROGRAM RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends entering into a two-year agreement to provide Rancho Cucamonga High School the Adult Sports Complex Stadium for high school graduation in the years 1994 and 1995. In exchange, the City will receive the usage of the Rancho Cucamonga High School gymnasium for its City Youth Basketball program in 1995 & 1996. BACKGROUND Rancho Cucamonga High School has requested that the City consider a joint use facility use agreement to allow its 1994 & 1995 graduation classes to conduct their commencement ceremonies at the Adult Sports Complex Stadium. Staff has been working with the high school representatives to develop the attached cooperative joint use facilities arrangement. In exchange for the stadium's base rental fee of $1,500, the City will be allowed use of the high school gymnasium for the City's Youth Basketball program. The basketball program has continually grown over the past few years. The participant levels have exceeded Community Services ability to provide indoor game space, therefore causing games to be played outside or relying on Sunday play indoors which was not popular with parents. The addition of Rancho Cucamonga High School gymnasium will have a positive impact on next winter basketball program. The fee exchange applies only to facility rental. It does not include staff, maintenance or operational expenses associated with usage. Any dates will be coordinated with Valley Baseball prior to approval. CITY COUNCIL MEETING APPROVALTO EXECUTE A JOINT USE AGREEMENT WITH RCHS June 1, 1994 Page 2 SUMMARY Staff believes this arrangement is mutually beneficial to both the City and Rancho Cucamonga High School. Re ectfully sub~~ Community Services Manager SO/KAS/kls ADDENDUM TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF PERMIT FOR USE OF THE ADULT SPORTS CENTER The Terms and Conditions of Permit for facility use of the Adult Sports Complex are modified to incorporate the following provisions between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Cucamonga High School: Rancho Cucamonga High School shall be permitted to rent the Adult Sports Complex Stadium for its 1994 and 1995 Senior Graduation. The rental payre. oPt for cnc day's d,te uf tire facility in 1994 and 1995 shall be exchanged for the City's use of the RCHS gym for ten Saturdays except for those days where a conflict of RCHS sports events are held. Facility conflicts will be resolved by school and city personnel. One Saturday conflict will be rescheduled to two Sunday afternoons. The city will be permitted to use the gymnasium on Saturdays from 8:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. from January through mid March in 1995 and 1996. December 1, 1994 is the deadline for approval and confirmation of the basketball league schedule. The exchange applies to rental fees only and does not include other facility use costs such as staffing, stadium lights, etc. , The rental date shall be coordinated with Valley Baseball Club, Inc. and the Quake baseball season home game schedule. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RANCHO CUCAMrINt..-A .P.'GH SCHOOL Suzanne Ota Community Services Manager Shawn Butters Operations Manager Date Date f DATE: TO: FROM: BY SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT June 1, 1994 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Henry Murakosht, Associate Civil Engineer APPROVAL AND AUTHORIZATION FOR EXECUTION OF CORDON USE AGREEMENT WITH SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT FOR JOINT USE OF FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT LAND AT THE ROCHESTER AVENUE EAST SIDE PARKWAY FROM VICTORIA PARK LANE TO HIGHLAND AVENUE RECOIeIENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the Agreement for joint use of Flood Control District Land by the City of Rancho Cucamonga for Landscaping of east side parkway along Rochester Avenue BACKGROUND/ANN, YSI S The project is to landscape the east side parkway of Rochester Avenue from Victoria Park Lane to Highland Avenue, including the west slope of the adjacent Day Creek Basin. It is funded by a California Transportation Commission (CTC) grant and matching RDA funds. The maintenance cost will be assigned to LMD-2. The grant was awarded to the City based upon the mitigating factors of landscaping the basin slope and parkway. Therefore staff reconmnends Council approve and execute the Commn Use Agreement with San Bernardino County Flood Control District. Respectful ly submitted, William J. 'Nell City Engineer WJO:HM:ly ROCHESTER AVENUE RANCHO CUCAMONGA HIGH SCHOOL MITIGATION PROGRAM FOR THE LANDSCAPING OF ROCHESTER AVENUE EASTSIDE PARKWAY CUCAMONGA PROJECT LOCATION, /' ., ~u,""mit ~ven~,e/' :--".i ~ '-"! . - ' - ' - ' - Z~ '>=< /; . - . . . o~. .' ': C;,'~. HALL 3:vlc 'a' C LOCATION MAP DATE: TO: FROM: BY SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCH0 CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT June 1, 1994 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Mike Olivier, Senior Civil Engineer APPROVAL AND EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION FOR RIGHT-OF-ENTRY FOR CONSTRUCTION SLOPE GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION OF DRAINAGE FACILITIES FOR THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RECOIIENDATION It is hereby reconmnended that the City Council approve and execute the agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamenga and General Dynamics Corporation for right-of-entry for construction slope grading and construction of drainage facilities for the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Metrolink Station, Phase I. 13~,ICfiROUIID/AIIALYSIS The City recently approved the plans and specifications for the construction of the Metrolink Station. After a period of bidding, a Contractor was selected for award of the project for construction. Included in this construction is slope grading along the perimeter of the parking lot and roads and construction of an outlet storm drain facility and related grading within General Dynamics' property. The agreement conveys the right-of-entry for the City's Contractor to construct this drainage work and to perform the grading in accordance with the plans and specifications. Also, conveyed in said agreement is General Dynamics' acceptance of drainage flows resulting from said drainage facility until a subsequent file drainage easement across General Dynamics' property is executed between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and General Dynamics Corporation. Respectful ly submitted William J. O'Neil City Engineer WjO:MO:sd Attachment: Metrolink Station Plan View Y '~,',','~',',',',',',,':'.,',',',',',',',','~.','~.',',',',',',',',',',',~,',', ~,',',~. - . .... ----- SLOPE ~ ?"'~.~"" i ~ -~ ....~ II ~ ~ SLOPE ~ ', U~DERGROU~D ~ Z " ~TOR~ DR~I~ ,, gRaDED D~I~E OUTL[~ ,, , METROLINK STATION PLAN VIEW DATE: TO: FROM: BY SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT June 1, 1994 Mayor and Members of the City Council jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Mike Olivier, Senior Civil Engineer APPROVAL AND EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA AND CATELLUS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION FOR RIGHT-OF- ENTRY FOR GRAJ)ING AND STORM DRAIN CONSTRUCTION FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE MILLIKEN AVENUE PROJECT FROM ARROW ROUTE TO FOOTHILL BOULEVARD RIECOIIq~DATION It is hereby reconmended that City Council approve and execute the agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Catellus Development Corporation for right-of-entry for grading and storm drain construction for the construction of the Milliken Avenue Project from Arrow Route to Foothill Boulevard. BACKGROIJIO/ANALYSIS The City has recently approved the plans and specifications for the construction of Milliken Avenue between Arrow Route and Foothill Boulevard. After a period of bidding a Contractor has been selected for award of the project for construction. Included with this street construction is a storm drain pipe in Arrow Route. The property owner, Catellus Development, has been cooperative and granted gratis dedication of the street rights-of-way for the project. One additional document for construction is the Right-of-Entry. This permission is needed to allow the contractor to enter onto the property to construct an inlet structure and perform on-site grading in conjunction with the storm drain and street. Catellus Development Corporation will maintain the drainage facilities on their property after they are constructed. Respectful] submlt~~ William City Engineer WJO:MO:sd Attachment: Location Map CITY OF:' IIIIi1~1111111111111111111111 z 1: .... P.._RO__~SED RTE. 30 FREEWAY HIGHLAND AVE. ('~ BASELINE '%RD. ,,PROJECT ~/~ ''~ ,=oo','.,--~ RANCHO CUCAMON. GA I N.T.S. A.T. It S.E R.R. IIIIIIIItllllllld.,,I,I,.I.l,l.a,l,I,Ll-, IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIt1111 METROLINK STATION tllllllllll'lll'll"lllll"l"'~' Id " !ii CITY OF ~' ~I FONTANA _1 I 4TH ST. CITY OF FREEWAY ONTARIO LOCATION MAP MILLIKEN AVENUE FROM FOOTHILL BLVD. TO ARROW RTE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: TO: FROM: BY SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA June 1, 1994 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager STAFF REPORT William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Linda R. Beek Jr. Engineer--~~ ' / AWARD AND AUTHORIZATION FOR EXECUTION OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION SURVEY FOR THE MILLIKEN AVENUE EXTENSION IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, LOCATED BETWEEN ARROW HIGHWAY AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD FOR THE AMOUNT OF $38,900.00, TO BE FUNDED FROM MEASURE I (ARTERIAL), ACCOUNT NO. 32-4637-9328 RECOIENDATION It is reconmnended that the City Council award and authorize for execution, the Professional Services Agreement for Construction Survey for the Mtlliken Avenue Extension Improvement Project to L.D. King, Incorporated, for the amount of $38,900.00 and authorize the Administrative Services Director to expend $38,g00.00 to be funded from Measure I (Arterial), Account No. 32-4637-9328. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS City staff solicited and received "Request for Qualifications" for the subject construction staking. After reviewing the qualifications, it was determined that L.D. King, Incorporated, met the needs of the project. Services will be provided on an as needed basis and payment will be made at the rates specified in the agreement. RespectfullJF-su, bmttted, . ,, \ William a. City Engineer WJO:LRB:ly Attachment cc: Purchasing PROPOSED RTE. ~0 FREEWAY <> HIGHLAND BASELINE AVE, RD. FOOTH ILL ARROW BLVD, PROPOSED /. LIMITS 2F PROJECT · ~///////1 U T E CITY OH" RANCHO CUCAM,Oh, I, GA A,T, el S.E R.R. t11111~1111111111t11111111111 111Jlllllllllllk,,~-~,14kl,'k~cllllllllllllllltlll!lllllllll METROLINK z STATION "r 4TH ST*. N,T,S, IIIIIII',IIIIIIIII:IIIIIIIIIIIIII CITY OF FONTANA CITY OF FREEWAY ONTARIO LOCATION MAP MILLIKEN AVENUE FROM FOOTHILL BLVD, TO ARROW RT[ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: TO: FROH: BY SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT June 1, 1994 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Linda R. Beek, Jr. Engineer AWARD AND AUTHORIZATION FOR EXECUTION OF CONTRACT FOR MILLIKEN AVENUE EXTENSION, BETWEEN ARROW ROUTE AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, AND THE ARROW ROUTE STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENT PROJECT TO RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION FOR THE AMOUNT OF $1,551,867.g0 ($1,410,789.00 PLUS 10% CONTINGENCY) TO BE FUNDED FROM SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY MEASURE I (ARTERIAL), ACCOUNT NO. 32-4637-9328 AND S.B. 140 ACCOUNT NO. 35-4637-9328 RIEC(XIIENDATION It is recomnended that the City Council accept all bids as submitted and award and authorize for execution, the contract for Milliken Avenue Extension, between Arrow Route and Foothill Boulevard, and the Arrow Route Storm Drain Improvement Project to the lowest responsive bidder, Riverside Construction, for the amount of $1,410,789.00 and authorize the Administrative Services Director to expend $1,551,867.90 ($1,410,789.00 plus 10% contingency), to be funded from San Bernardino County Measure I (Arterial) Account No. 32-4637- 9328 and S.B. 140 Account No. 35-4637-9328. BAClCGR(XJND/ANALYSIS City Council authorized the solicitation of bids for the Milliken Avenue Extension and Arrow Route Storm Drain Extension on April 6, 1994. The bids were received and opened on May 3, 1994. The firm of Riverside Construction is the successful low bidder. This project will finally complete a major missing link in the Clty's surface transportation infrastructure. It will also provide a major connection to the new Metrolink Station. The new Milliken Avenue portion will be constructed with an interim 4-lane road with curbs and street lights. The median island will be partially installed at Foothill Boulevard and Arrow Route for delineation purposes. The major portion of the median island and the future third lane, between Arrow Route and Foothill, will be left for development to construct, as the need arises. Along with the street construction there will be a new signal at Arrow Route and modification of the one at Foothill. Completion of a major storm drain is also included in this project which will carry storm flows from Milliken to Day Creek Channel. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT MILLIKEN AVENUE EXTENSION june 1, 1994 Page 2 Riverside Construction is the apparent lowest responsive bidder, with a bid amount of $1,410,789.00 (see attached bid summary). The Engineer's estimate was $1,616,528.40. Staff has reviewed all bids received and found them to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds all bidders to meet the requirements of the bid documents. Re spec tfu 11 y s~bmi tted, ' William J. O'Ne'~-y City Engineer WjO:LRB:ly Attachment CITY OF' Illlllllllllllltlllllltllllll PROPOSED FOOTH I L L RTE. 30 FREE._~WAY ARROW RANCHO IIIIIIIIIIItlllk.'-4~,l-l-II.,I.'l.l,rlllllllllllllllllllllllllllll HIGHLAND AVE. BASELINE %RD. LIMITS BOL~D' PROPOSED PROJECTO ~//:~//////,4 R UTE 'CUCAMON. GA- I N.T.S. A.T. 8S.E R.R. METROLINK STATION z -r 4TH ST. CITY OF FONTANA CITY OF (~) FREEWAY ONTARIO LOCATION MAP MILLIKEN AVENUE FROM FOOTHILL BLVD. TO ARROW CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA J..e lgg4 STAFF REPORT Mayor, and Meters of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works InsI ~ RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND FOR TRACT 13728, LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF HILLSIDE ROAD AND SAPPHIRE STREET RECO~I(NDATION It is reco~nded that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond. BACKGROUll/ANALYSIS The required one year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain free from defects in material s and workmanship, Release: DEVELOPER: Hillside Sapphire Venture 1 Park Plaza, Suite 1250 Irvine, CA 92714 Store Drain $7,400 Maintenance Guarantee Bond Streets $71,300 Respectfully submitted, Wtllt~N~L'~L City Engineer WJO:SMG:dlw DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA J..e 1, STAFF REPORT Mayor, and Meni~ers of the City Council jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspecto~ RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND FOR PARCEL MAP 11472, LOCATED ON SOUTH SIDE OF 19TH STREET EAST OF HERMOSA AVENUE RECOIIiIENDATION It is reconmended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond. BACKGROUIO/ANALYSIS The required one year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. Release: DEVELOPER: Tri Calc Industries 4737 North Vincent Avenue Covtna, CA 91722 Maintenance Guarantee Cash Deposit $1,100.00 Respectful ly submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO: SMG :dlw DATE: TO: FROM: BY SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA J..e 1, 1994 STAFF REPORT Mayor and Men/~ers of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer APPROVAL OF RELEASE OF A PORTION OF FUNDS DEPOSITED UNDER AGREEMENT CO-gO-139 FOR PAYMENT OF SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY IMPROVEMENTS AT THE ROCHESTER CROSSING, TO THE WILLIAM LYON COMPANY. RIEC(X~kENDATION It is recomnended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution a proving the release of a portion of previously deposited funds n excess of t~e amount of the final i invoices from Southern Pacific Railroad (SPRR) and Metrolink to The William Lyon Company. BACKP~OUID/ANALYSIS On October 3, 1990, the City Council a proved an agreement with The William Lyon Co any. Per the agreement ~e Willtam Lyon Company deposited $146,334.n~0 for improvements to be Installed b the Southern Pacific Railroad {SPRR). The improvements have been complete s~nce February 1993. The City has received the final invoices from Metrolink and SPRR. Consequent]y, The William Lyon Cornpan is requesting that the balance of funds be released to them. However The Wi{liam ),yon Cornpan is dis uting the final invoice from SPRR. SPRR bifled for the signal equipment 180%. Since the abandonment of the line the signal equipment was not installed. The City will work with The William on Company to resolve this issue. In the meantime, release of a portion o~Ythe funds in excess of the final invoice amount is appropriate. The ex enditures to date, from the $146,334 deposited, are as follows: 1) 30 $39,62~ to SPRR in December 1990 for 80% of cost of the materials. 2) $ ,000 to the William Lyon Cornpan in 1993 to co~lete the Rochester railroad crossing. This leaves a balance oMaFY)76,710. The final invoices total approximately $38,500. Authorizing the release of $34,000 will leave a balance of approximately $42,710 to pay the final invoices. City Engineer WJO:MP:dlw Attachments 4,dc~0 VON KARMAN, P.O BOX 7520, NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658-7520 · (7149 833-3600 · FAX (714) 476-8e04 April 19, 1994 Hr. William J, O'Neil City Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91729 RE: RELEASE OF FUNDS HELD BY CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Dear Hr. O'Neil: Currently, the City of Rancho Cucamonga is holding $76,710, which is the remaining balance of a cash deposit The William Lyon Company (TWLC) made to the City relative to improving the Rochester Railroad crossing. I have discussed this account with Mr. Dan James in your offices in relation to a final bill we received from Southern Pacific Railroad (SPRR) in the amount of $33,599.92. It is our understanding that after SPRR is paid, the remainder of the $75,710 would be remitted to TWLC. As you know, TWLC disagrees with SPRR over the amount of their bill. Given these circumstances, we respectfully request that the City hold $33,599.92 plus a "cushion" until the SPRR billing is resolved, and release the balance to TWLC so that we may use the funds to pay bills related to other improvements currently underway in Vineyards South. Thank you for your consideration of this request. Sincerely, THE WILLIAM LYON COMPANY 7 Randy Wheeler Vice President cc: Frank Jensen REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT · .~ (,i ': ." C.."TY OF RANCH. t: ..... DIVIS!OpI RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE RELEASE OF A PORTION OF FUNDS DEPOSITED BY THE WILLIAM LYON COMPANY FOR PAYMENT OF SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY IMPROVEMENTS AT THE ROCHESTER CROSSING WHEREAS, Agreement CO g0-139 approved at the City Council meeting of October 3, 1990, by Resolution 90-382 by and between the City and The William Lyon Company; and WHEREAS, said agreement provided $146,354.00 for improvements by Southern Pacific Transportation Company; and WHEREAS, said improvements have been completed and accepted; and WHEREAS; final invoices have been received from Southern Pacific Railroad and Metrolink. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES that a portion of excess funds in the amount of $34,000.00 may be released to The William Lyon Company. DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT June 1, 1994 Mayor and Members of the City Council jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Linda R. Beek, Jr. Engineer--'~~ ACCEPT THE NINTH STREET WATERLINE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, LOCATED FROM VINMA. R TO SIERRA MADRE AVENUES, AS COMPLETE AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO FILE A "NOTICE OF COMPLETION" AND APPROVE THE FINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $22,057.40 RECC)IiENDATION: It is recomnended that the City Council accept the Ninth Street Waterline Improvement Project, 1 ocated from Vinmar to Sierra Madre Avenues, Contract No. CO 94-003, as complete, authorize the City Engineer to file a "Notice of Completion", and retain the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of $22,625.00 to be used as the Maintenance Bond. Authorize the release of the retention in the amount of $2,205.74, 35 days after approval of the final contract amount of $22,057.40. BA~KGI~OUNO/ANJ~LYSIS The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The original amount approved by Council was $24,887.50. The final contract amount, based on project documentation, is $22,057.40. Respectful ly submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:LRB:sd Attachment RESOUUTION .0./ 0 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE NINTH STREET WATERLINE IMPROVEHENT PROJECT, LOCATED FROH VINMAR TO SIERRA MADRE AVENUES, CONTRACT NO. CO 94-003 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COHPLETION WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for the Ninth Street Waterline In~Drovement Project, located from Vinmar to Sierra ~adre Avenues, have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work coal ete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. f DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBjECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM June 1, 1994 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Linda R. Beek, jr. Enginee~ / ACCEPT THE SAPPHIRE STREET STORM DRAIN AND STREET IMPROVEMENT, BANYAN STREET TO MOON COURT; CARNELIAJ4 STREET ACCESS RAMPS, BASE LINE ROAD TO NINETEENTH STREET; AND BASE LINE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS, EAST OF VICTORIA PARK LANE, AS COMPLETE, RETAIN FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO FILE A "NOTICE OF COMPLETION" AND APPROVE THE FINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $72,200.25 RF,~ClIIEMDATION: It is recomnended that the City Council accept the Sapphire Street Storm Drain and Street Improvement, Banyan Street to Moon Court; Carnelian Street Access Ramps, Base Line Road to Nineteenth Street; and Base Line Road Improvements, East of Victoria Park Lane, Contract No. C.O. 94-010, as complete, authorize the City Engineer to file a "Notice of Completion", and retain the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of $70,774.00 to be used as the Maintenance Bond. Authorize the release of the retention in the amount of $2,707.40, 35 days after approval of the final contract amount of $72,200.25. BACKGROUMD/ANALYSIS The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The original amount approved by Council was $77,851.00. The final contract amount, based on project documentation, is $72,200.25. Respectfully submitted, William J. O'~l~~~~ City Engineer WjO:LRB:sd Attachment RESOLUTION NO. q4- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE SAPPHIRE STREET STORM DRAIN AND STREET IMPROVEMENT, BANYAN STREET TO MOON COURT; CARNELIAN STREET ACCESS RAMPS, BASE LINE ROAD TO NINETEENTH STREET; AND BASE LINE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS, EAST OF VICTORIA PARK LANE, CONTRACT NO. CO 94-010 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for the Sapphire Street Storm Drain and Street Improvement, Banyan Street to Moon Court; Carnelian Street Access Ramps, Base Line Road to Nineteenth Street; and Base Line Road Improvements, East of Victoria Park Lane, have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: June 1, 1994 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Mayor, Members of the City Council and City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Lucinda E. Hackett, Associate Engineer CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORTS AND RESOLUTION FOR THE LEVY THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN THE STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1,2,3,4,5,6,7, AND 8 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1994/95. NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE [S PROPOSED. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council hold the public hearing and approve the Annual Engineer's Reports and Resolution establishing the assessment rates for Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1,2,3,4,5,6,7, and 8. It is recommended there be no increase in assessment rates in these districts for Fiscal Year 1994/95. BACKGROUND / AN A LYSIS Below is an itemized analysis on a district by district basis. To summarize, the assessment rates in all eight of the Street Light Maintenance Districts are not recommended to be increased this fiscal year. These assessments cover the actual costs of the districts. Southern California Edison has advised the City that they do not intend to raise electrical rates for FY 94/95. Therefore electrical charges are expected to remain stable .and the current assessment rate will cover the actual costs of the districts. In prior years State Gas Tax Funds were used to subsidize the districts. At the present time, each district is able to stand on its own without additional funding from other sources. In some districts there is an increase in the number of street lights being maintained however these will not affect the assessment rate at this time. Edison charges for traffic signals are also included in the applicable districts. [n addition, Operations and Maintenance charges for traffic signals, will also be borne by the applicable districts. In many of the districts the tax delinquency has decreased thereby increasing the revenue in those districts. In past years any available prior year carryover was used to keep assessments below the annual assessment revenue requirements. This policy continues for the FY 94/95 and will allow the assessment rates to remain stable. The following, in conjunction with reference to the Preliminary Engineer's Reports, identifies proposed FY 94/95 rates which are not recommended for an increase from the FY 93/94 rates. The Preliminary Engineer's Reports identifies the required budget for each district and any carryover used to offset maintenance costs. Street Lighting Maintenance l;)istrict NO. 1: Arterial The assessment rate is recommended to remain at $17.77 for Fiscal Year 1994/95. Prior year carryover funds will still be used to keep the rate from increasing. However, these carryover funds will not be available in future years. Street Lighting Maintenance District N0.2_z LoCal The assessment rate is recommended to remain at $39.97 for Fiscal Year 1994/95. Electricity costs increased only $4,360 over the FY 93/94 because of new area being accepted into the district. Prior year carryover funds will be applied in the district. However, these carryover funds may not be available in future years. Street Lighting Maintenance District NO. 3 z Victoria Planned Community The assessment rate will remain at $45.15 for Fiscal Year 1994/95. Prior year carryovers will be applied but may not be available in the future. Street Lighting Maintenance District NCL 4: Tetra Vista Planned Community The assessment rate will remain at $28.96 for Fiscal Year 1994/95. Prior year carryover funds will be applied in the district. However, these carryover funds may not be available in future years. Street Lighting Maintenance District N~. 5z Caryn Planned C~>mmunity The assessment rate will remain at $34.60 for Fiscal Year ]994/95. Prior year carryovers will be applied but may not be available in the future. Street Lighting Maintenance District NO..6.: Commercial /Industrial The assessment rate will remain at $51.40 for Fiscal Year 1994/95. Prior year carryover funds will be applied in the district, however they may not be available in future years. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. Z: North Etiwanda An assessment increase is not recommended in this district, the rate will remain at $33.32 for Fiscal Year 1994/95. Prior year carryover funds will be applied in the district, however they may not be available in future years. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 :South Etiwanda An assessment increase is not recommended in this district, but remain at $193.75 for Fiscal Year 1994/95 This proposed rate is higher than the average lighting district due to a disproportionate number of street lights to assessment units. As more assessment units are annexed to the district it is expected that the street light-to-assessment unit will be reduced thereby reducing the assessment rate. ResPectfUllY-,~ubmittedC~.zL.,LLL.../ William~ City Engineer WJO:ws Attachments: Resol u tion Engineer's Reports Street Light Maintenance District Highlights Street Light Maintenance District 1 - Arterial Streets Prior year carryover funds keep assessment rate from increasing. 22.37 new assessment units annexed into district. The assessment rate for FY 94/95 is recommended to remain at the FY 93/94 rate of $17.77. Street Light Maintenance District 2 - Local Streets, General City Prior year carryover help keep rate from increasing. The assessment rate for FY 94/95 is recommended to remain at the FY 93/94 rate of $39.97. Street Light Maintenance District 3 - Victoria Planned Community Prior year carryover help keep rate from increasing The assessment rate for FY 94/95 is recommended to remain at the FY 93/94 rate of $47.15. Street Light Maintenance District 4 - Tetra Vista Planned Community Prior year carryover help keep rate from increasing The assessment rate for FY 94/95 is recommended to remain at the FY 93/94 rate of $28.96 Street Light Maintenance District 5 - Caryn Planned Community No new assessments units have been annexed into the district. No substantial increases in the district's budget this fiscal year. The assessment rate for FY 94/95 is recommended to remain at the FY 93/94 rate of $34.60. Street Light Maintenance District 6 - Commercial Industrial 15.34 new assessment units have been annexed into the district. Prior year carryover help keep rate from increasing. The assessment rate for FY 94/95 is recommended to remain at the FY 93/94 rate of 551.40. Street Light Maintenance District 7 - North Etiwanda No new assessments units have been annexed into the district. Prior year carryover help keep rate from increasing. The assessment rate for FY 94/95 is recommended to remain at the FY 93/94 rate of $33.32. Street Light Maintenance District 8 - South Etiwanda No new assessments units have been annexed into the district. Prior year carryover help keep rate from increasing. The assessment rate for FY 94/95 is recommended to remain at the FY 93/94 rate of $193.75. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 4th day of May, 1994, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 94-086 to order the therein described work in connection with the Street Lighting Maintenance Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 which Resolution of Intention No. 9442)86 was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by law, shown by the affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the Office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, any new street lights in areas to be maintained by the District, will become part of the active work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. The normal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a sufficient non-refundable deposit will be made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of energizing and six months of ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the street lights in each development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. The costs will be based on thee number and type of street lights and based on Southern California Edison Company's rate for street lights. Immediately upon energization of the street lights, those street lights will become a part of the work program of the district. WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received and considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplation work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired jurisdiction to order the proposed work. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: SF. CTION 1: That the public interest and convenience requires the levy and collection of assessments within the Street Lighting Maintenance Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 for the Fiscal Year 1994/95, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of Intention No. 94-086, be done and made; and SECTION 2-. Be if further resolved that the report filed by the Engineer is hereby finally approved; and SECTION 3: Be it finally resolved that the assessments for Fiscal Year 1994/95 method of assessment in the Engineer's Report are hereby approved. Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Light District No. I (Arterial Streets) Fiscal Year 1994/95 City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets) Fiscal Year 94/95 The FY 94/95 annual report for Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Background: Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (SLD #1) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial street throughout the City. The facilities within this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the City as a whole on an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance and/or installation of the facilities is assigned to this City-wide district. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals and street lights can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Any new street lights in areas to be maintained by the District, will become part of the active work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. The normal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a sufficient non-refundable deposit will be made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of energizing and six months of ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the street lights in each development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. The costs will be based on the number and type of street lights and based on Southern California Edison Company's rate for street lights. Immediately upon energization of the street lights, those street lights will become a part of the work program of the district. Projected Costs: The majority of the budgeted costs for SLD #1 is for electricity charges for the power to the street lights and traffic signals. A tax delinquency amount is added to arrive at the Revenue Required to maintain the district. This is a projected amount of delinquency tax payments which is anticipated to occur during FY 94/95 based upon actual tax receipts. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD #1 are as follows: Proposed Maintenance Budget for 1994/95 Total Personnel Maintenance and Operations Contract Services T-raffic Signal Adjustment General Liability Electric Utilities Operations Subtotal: Assessment Administration and General Overhead Tax Delinquency Subtotal: Total Revenue Required: Less: 93/94 District Carryover Assessment Revenue Required: $0.00 $17,200.00 $1,000.00 $ 4,120.00 $269.780.00 $292,100.CK) $123,790.00 $56.870.00 $180,660.00 $472,760.00 <$41,080.00> $431,680.00 AnaLysis: Assessment Rates for FY 94/95 have not been increased. 22.37 new assessment units have been annexed into the district. FY 94/95 Assessment Rate: For FY 94/95 the rate per assessment unit is $17.77. That is the same rate as FY 93/94. The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district: Unit No. of Unit Rate/ I ~ Use Type Units Rate Factnr A.U. Revenue Commercial Acre 3769.26 $17.77 2 $35.54 $133,960.00 Single Family Parcel 16,754 $17.77 1 $17.77 $297.720.00 Total $431,680.00 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT1 HUY nlSlllgl m CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SAN BFDNARDINO COUNTY . I II~PNI l STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT #1 ANNEXATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1994/95 FEBRUARY 17, 1993 PM 14318 3.47 AC - 6.94AU MARCH 17, 1993 PM 11738 3 DU - 3AU MARCH 17, 1993 CUP 92-19 10.37 AC - 20.74AU MARCH 17, 1993 DR 92-07 1.5 AC - 3.0AU APRIL 7, 1993 PM 13800 2 DU- 2AU NOVEMBER 17, 1993 PM 13075 2 DU - 2AU A:i~iE55MENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE. DISTRICT N0.3 E! STREET LIGHTING' MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. i AND 6' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA ,~,~, ~,,~, 71 LEGEND EXHIBIT 'A' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 2 Z 2 3 .. DENOTES EQUESTRIAN TRAIL ,aim I/'~mml4,mB. DENOTES STREET LIGHT CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO SCALE I% 80' STATE OF CALIFORNIA PM I;738 EXHiBTT "A" EXHIBIT .A. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.3 8 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DI.STRICT NOS. I AND 6 I//C'/~/?'~ ~,7~L,~ ~ JOB0? JERSEY · . -. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA' ~ , COUNTy OF SAN BERN~RDINO C-,.4 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EXHIBIT 'A' ASSESSMENT DIAGR'AM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO S. I AND 6 IB(~I lice' ? ~. L.SO?ar..,.,,,,I. : r, I'Jr'TIt -- S~'.'TC~:~' " .. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONQA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO (~ .~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO S. '1 AND 2 .. CITY OF RANGHO CUGAMONQA COUNTY OF SAN IERNARDINO STATI OF CALIFORNIA. ENVIRONMENTAL HIGHTECH I E, N~G] NE~x~.~EIf GR II~.-llZl Y&Z (TI~) Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Light District No. 2 (Local Streets) Fiscal Year 1994/95 Approved."~ ' ' ' ' William ] City Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 (Local Streets) Fiscal Year 94/95 The FY 94/95 annual report for Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 (Local Streets) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Background: Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 (SLD #2) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on local streets throughout the City but excluding those areas already in a local maintenance district. Generally this area encompasses the residential area of the City west of Haven Avenue. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals on local streets generally west of Haven Avenue. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. . Any new street lights in areas to be maintained by the District, will become part of the active work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. The normal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a non-refundable deposit will be made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of energizing and six months of ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the street lights in each development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. The costs will be based on the number and type of street lights and based on Southern California Edison Company's rate for street lights. Immediately upon energization of the street lights, those street lights will become a part of the work program of the district. Projected Costs: The majority of the budgeted operating costs for SLD #2 is for electric utility charges for the street lights and traffic signals within the district. A tax delinquency amount is added to arrive at the Revenue Required to maintain the district. This is a projected amount of delinquency tax payments which is anticipated to occur during FY 94/95 based upon actual tax receipts. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD #2 are as follows: Proposed Maintenance Budget for 1994/95 Total Personnel Maintenance and Operations Contract Services Traffic Signal Adjustment General Liability Electric Utilities Operations and Capital Subtotal: Assessment Administration and General Overhead Tax Delinquency Subtotal: Total Revenue Required: Less: FY 93/94 District Carryover Assessment Revenue Required: 0 0 0 $2,570.00 $206.030.00 $208,600.00 $50,670.00 $19.100.00 $69,770.00 $278,370.00 <$18,500.00> $259,860.00 Analysis: Assessment Rams for FY 94/95 are not recommended to be increased. FY 94/95 Assessment Rate: For FY 94/95 the rate per assessment unit is $39.97. This is the same rate as FY 93/94. following itemizes the assessment rate for the district: Unit No. of Unit Rate/ I and Use Type Units Rate Factnr A.U. Commercial Acre 249.65 $39.97 2 $79.94 Single Family Parcel 6002.00 $39.97 I $39.97 Total The Revenue $19,960.00 $239.900.00 $259,860.00 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT ~ 4IH SI ............ ; ai.e~ CITY LI/TS IllllAl[ BIXtBARY ~IRICI BOIH)ART CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SAN BF"'NARDINO COUNTY ,.,{.IFORNIA STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT #2 ANNEXATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1994/95 MARCH 17, 1993 PM 11738 3 DU - 3AU APRIL 7, 1993 PM 13800 2 DU - 2AU NOVEMBER 17, 1993 PM 13075 2 DU - 2AU 81 ** · LEGEND EXHIBIT 'A' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 Z 2 3 .i DENOTES EQUESTRIAN TRAIL DENOTES STREET LIGHT' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO $CALE: I', 80' STATE OF CALIFORNIA PM 11738 EXHIBIT "A" ASSESSMENT .DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTFIICT NO. I STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE D|STFIICT NOS. '1 AND 2 .. CITY OF RANGHO CUGAMONQA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATI OF CALIFORNIA . ~b O. Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Light DistriCt No. 3 (Victoria Planned Community) Fiscal Year 1994/95 City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Street Light Maintenance District No. 3 (Victoria Planned Community) Fiscal Year 94/95 The FY 94/95 annual report for Street Light Maintenance District No. 3 (Victoria Planned Community) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Background: Street Light Maintenance District No. 3 (SLD #3) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located within the Victoria Planned Community. Generally this area encompasses the area of the City east of Deer Creek Channel, south of Highland Avenue, north of Base Line Road, and west of Etiwanda Avenue. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals on local streets within the Victoria Planned Community. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals and street lights can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Any new street lights in areas to be maintained by the District, will become part of the active work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. The normal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a non-refundable deposit will be made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of energizing and six months of ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the street lights in each development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. The costs will be based on the number and type of street lights and based on Southern California Edison Company's rate for street lights. Immediately upon energization of the street lights, those street lights will become a part of the work program of the district. Projected Costs: A tax delinquency amount is added to arrive at the Revenue Required to maintain the district. This is a projected amount of delinquency tax payments which is anticipated to occur during FY 94/95 based upon actual tax receipts. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD #3 are as follows: Proposed Maintenance Budget for 1994/95 Total Personnel Maintenance and Operations Contract Services Traffic Signal Adjustment General Liability Electric Utilities Operations and Capital Subtotal: Assessment Administration and General Overhead Tax Delinquency Subtotal: Total Revenue Required: Less: 93/94 District Carryover Assessment Revenue Required: $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,810.00 $146.660.00 $148,470.00 $34,560.00 $8,480.00 $43,040.00 $191,510.00 <$4.630.00> $186,880.00 Anab'sis: Assessment Rates for FY 94/95 have not been increased. FY 94/93 Assessment Rate: For FY 94/95 the rate per assessment unit is $47.15. This is the same rate as FY 93/94. following itemizes the assessment rate for the district: Unit No. of Unit Rate/ I and Use Type Units Rate Factor A.U. Commercial Acre 35.29 $47.15 2 $94.30 Single Family Parcel 3893.00 $47.15 1 $47.15 Total The Revenue $3,328.00 $183.550.00 $186,880.00 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 3 C!~ITI) Za JAMUAIY 1993 BY: G~ D' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SAN BEP"~,RDINO COUNTY , .., ll?flPMl A Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Light District No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community) Fiscal Year 1994/95 No. 24953 ,V. ~. /,,.2 -,31-c77. Approved:/4M-d-(d~t-~ '~,'C./~ WilliamJ. O' ty Eng~eer City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Street Light Maintenance District No. 4 (Tetra Vista Planned Community) Fiscal Year 94/95 The FY 94/95 annual report for Street Light Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Back~'ound: Street Light Maintenance District No. 4 (SLD #4) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located within the Terra Vista Planned Community. Generally this area encompasses the area of the City east of Haven Avenue, south of Base Line Road, north of Foothill Boulevard, and west of Rochester Avenue. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets within the Tetra Vista Planned Community. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals and street lights can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Any new street lights in areas to be maintained by the District, will become part of the active work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. The normal process' will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a non-refundable deposit will be made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of energizing and six months of ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the street lights in each development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. The costs will be based on the number and type of street lights and based on Southern California Edison Company's rate for street lights. Immediately upon energization of the street tights, those street tights will become a part of the work program of the district. Projected Costs: The majority of the budgeted costs for SLD #4 is for electricity charges for the power to the street lights and traffic signals in the amount of nearly $50,000. A tax delinquency amount is added to arrive at the Revenue Required to maintain the district. This is a projected amount of delinquency tax payments which is anticipated to occur during FY 94/95 based upon actual tax receipts. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD ~ are as follows: Proposed Maintenance Budget for 1994/95 Total Personnel Maintenance and Operations Contract Services Traffic Signal Adjustment General Liability Electric Utilities Operations and Capital Subtotal: Assessment Administration and General Overhead Tax Delinquency Subtotal: Total Revenue Required: Less: FY 93/94 Carryover Assessment Revenue Required: $19,140.00 $10,000.00 $5,000.00 $840.00 $49,890.00 $ 84,870.00 $19,010.00 $3.260.00 $22,270.00 $107,140.(~) <$13,510.00> $93,630.00 Analysis: Assessment Rates for FY 94/95 will remain at $28.96 per year. FY 94/95 Assessment Rate: For FY 94/95 the recommended rate per assessment unit is $28.96. This is the same as the rate for FY 93/94. The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district: Unit No. of Unit Rate/ I and Use Type Units Rate Factnr A.U. Revenue Commercial Acre 785.58 $28.96 2 $57.92 $45,500.00 Single Family Parcel 1,662.00 $28.96 1 $28.96 $48.130.00 Total $93,630.00 91 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 4 ~J I C) Z ARROM HVV I I i I I 6TH _ _ S1 ,,) elm I/__ I t ( I ~--J II CREATe) 28 JANUARY 1993 !U~mJR(2 ~8~IQC~S G.LS D!Vi~ON CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY c^I,IFORNIA Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Light District No. 5 (Caryn Planned Community). Fiscal Year 1994/95 l'~ No. 24953 ,- ~ iD'/'''q' ~/- c77 City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Street Light Maintenance District No. 5 (Caryn Planned Community) Fiscal Year 94/95 The FY 94/95 annual report for Street Light Maintenance District No. 5 (Caryn Planned Community) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). BackSround: Street Light Maintenance District No. 5 (SLD #5) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located within the Caryn Planned Community. Generally this area encompasses the area of the City east of Miiliken Avenue, south of Banyan Street, north of Highland Avenue, and west of Rochester Avenue. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets within the Caryn Planned Community. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals and street lights can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Any new street lights in areas to be maintained by the District, will become part of the active work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. The normal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a non-refundable deposit will be made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of energizing and six months of ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the street lights in each development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. The costs will be based on the number and type of street lights and based on Southern California Edison Company's rate for street lights. Immediately upon energization of the street lights, those street lights will become a part of the work program of the district. Projected Costs: The majority of the budgeted costs for SLD #5 is for electricity charges for the power to the street lights and traffic signals in the amount of over $27,000. A tax delinquency amount is added to arrive at the Revenue Required to maintain the district. This is a projected amount of delinquency tax payments which is anticipated to occur during FY 94/95 based upon actual tax receipts. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD #5 are as follows: Proposed Maintenance Budget for 1994/95 Regular Payroll Fringe Benefits Maintenance and Operations Contract Services Traffic Signal Adjustment General Liability Electric Utilities Operations and Capital Subtotal: Assessment Administration and General Overhead Delinquency Contingency Subtotal: Total Revenue Required: Less: FY 93/94 District Carryover Assessment Revenue Required: $4,080.00 $1,510.00 $12,780.00 $0.00 $490.00 $27.330.00 $46,190.00 $9,170.00 $26,280.00 $35,450.00 $81,640.00 <$41,120.00> $40,520.00 Analysis: There are no substantial increases in the district's budget and no new assessment units have been annexed into the district. It is recommended the assessment rates for FY 94/95 not be increased. FY 94/95 Assessment Rate: For FY 94/95 the rate per assessment unit is $34.60. This is the same as the rate for FY 93/94. The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district: Unit No. of Unit Rate/ I and Use Type Unit~ Rate Factnr A.U. Revenue Single Family Parcel 1.171,00 $34.60 1 $34.60 $40.520.00 Total 1,171.00 $40,520.00 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 5 I I · I c~ I I I / ~ I · II IJI, TIIAI[ IIIXN)ARY ISII~I' BOLNMRY C]!IA'II) ZB JAIIULRY I~ BY: G.L~L !1 ~Ck. 1eliOt& CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SAN BF. PNARDINO COUNTY , jFORNIA Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Light District No. 6 (Commercial/Industrial) Fiscal Year 1994/95 · 24953 r"~! E~. /..~ - ~ I - ~ ;7 City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial/Industrial) Fiscal Year 94195 The FY 94/95 annual report for Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial/Industrial) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Background: Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (SLD #6) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on commercial and industrial streets throughout the City but excluding those areas already in a local maintenance district. Generally this area encompasses the industrial of the City south of Foothill Boulevard. It has been determined that the facilities within this district benefit this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on industrial or commercial streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on industrial or commercial streets generally south of Foothill Boulevard. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals and street lights can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Any new street lights in areas to be maintained by the District, will become part of the active work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. The normal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a non-refundable deposit will be made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of energizing and six months of ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the street lights in each development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. The costs will be based on the number and type of street lights and based on Southern California Edison Company's rate for street lights. Immediately upon energization of the street lights, those street lights will become a part of the work program of the district. Projected Costs: The majority of the budgeted costs for SLD #6 is for electricity charges for the power to the street lights and traffic signals in the amount of over $33,000. A tax delinquency amount is added to arrive at the Revenue Required to maintain the district. This is a projected amount of delinquency tax payments which is anticipated to occur during FY 94/95 based upon actual tax receipts. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD ~6 are as follows: Proposed Maintenance Budget for 1994/95 Total Personnel Maintenance and Operations Contract Services Traffic Signal Adjustment General Liability Electric Utilities Maintenance & Operations Subtotal: Assessment Administration and General Overhead Tax DeLinquency Subtotal: Total Revenue Required: Less: 93/94 District Carryover Assessment Revenue Required: $8,380.00 $2,500.00 $6,580.00 $490.00 $33,980.00 $51,930.00 $5,860.00 $7.410.00 $13,270.00 $65,200.00 <$10.460.00> $54,740.00 Analysis: Assessment rates for FY 94/95 are not recommenced to increase. 15.34 new assessment units have been annexed into the district. FY 94/95 Assessment Rate: For FY 94/95 the recommended rate per assessment unit is $,51.40. This is the same as the rate of FY 93/94. The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district: Unit No. of Unit Rate/ I and Use Tyl~e Units Rah= Facet A.U. Revenue Indstrial/Comm. Acre 1064.91 $51.40 1 $51.40 $54.740.00 Total $54,740.00 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 6 8 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SAN BERMARDINO COUNTY L JFORNIA STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT #6 ANNEXATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1994/95 FEBRUARY 17, 1993 PM 14318 3.47 AC - 3.47AU MARCH 17, 1993 CUP 92-19 10.37 AC - 10.37AU MARCH 17, 1993 DR 92-07 1.5 AC - 1.5AU 101 A~i~i~SSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 8 STREET LIGHTING' MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6' · CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA EXHIBIT 'A' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.3 B STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO S. I AND 6 ,/ _,,=~ ~N r 0 10807 JERSEY' II,VD, JER$£1' 8LVD. SCA&,E: I"z -. , CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA* ' COUNTY OF SAN BERN~kRDINO C., -'. STATE OF CALIFORNIA rltP 92 - I~ 103 EXHIBIT 'A' ASSESSMENT DIAGR'AM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. '1 AND 6 riFTif - - STrICI:::T · · .. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONQA COUNTY OF SAN BERN~kRDINO (~ .~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Light District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) Fiscal Year 1994/95 Approved: ?gOF ES$~3~~ 249 105 City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Street Light Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) Fiscal Year 94/95 The FY 94/95 annual report for Street Light Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Background: Street Light Maintenance District No. 7 (SLD #7) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on local streets in what is termed the North Etiwanda area of the City. Generally this area encompasses the area of the City east of Day Creek Channel and north of Highland Avenue within the incorporated area of the City. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets within the North Etiwanda area. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals and street lights can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Any new street lights in areas to be maintained 15y the District, will become part of the active work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. The normal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a non-refundable deposit will be made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of energizing and six months of ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the street lights in each development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. The costs will be based on the number and type of street lights and based on Southern California Edison Company's rate for street lights. Immediately upon energization of the street lights, those street lights will become a part of the work program of the district. Projected Costs: The majority of the budgeted costs for SLD #7 is for electricity charges for the power to the street lights and traffic signals in the amount of over $11,000. A tax delinquency amount is added to arrive at the Revenue Required to maintain the district. This is a projected amount of delinquency tax payments which is anticipated to occur during FY 94/95 based upon actual tax receipts. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD #7 are as follows: 106 Proposed Maintenance Budget for 1994/95 Total Personnel Maintenance and Operations Contract Services Traffic Signal Adjustment General Liability Electric Utilities Operations and Capital Subtotal: Assessment Administration and General Overhead Tax Delinquency Subtotal: Total Revenue Required: Less: 93/94 District Carryover Assessment Revenue Required: $5,590.00 $200.00 $1,370.00 $180.00 $11.770.00 $19,110.00 $4,810.00 $9.670.00 $14,480.C)0 $33,590.00 <$13,000.00> $20,590.00 Analysis: Assessment rates for FY 94/95 are not recommended to increase. No new assessment units have been annexed into the district this year. FY 94/95 Assessment Rate: For FY 94/95 the recommended rate per assessment unit is $33.32. There is no increase in this assessment rate over the FY 93/94 rate. district: The following itemizes the assessment rate for the Unit No. of Unit Rate/ I and Use Type Uni~ Rate Factor A.U. Revenue Single Family Parcel 618.00 $33.32 1 $33.32 $20.590.00 Total 618.00 $20,590.00 107 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 7 I ~" I I I I ___ HILLSIDE_ l . I I t , ,- &.- , J i i i i i i :1 ,,',. llllo _ ,,^sE,:...[ _ "/" d FOOTHILL,. 8.,LVD CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY r IFORNIA Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Light District No. 8 (South Etiwanda) Fiscal Year 1994/95 APPr°ved'/~W' lh~~y Engineer 109 City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Street Light Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda) Fiscal Year 94/95 The FY 94/95 annual report for Street Light Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Bacl~round: Street Light Maintenance District No. 8 (SLD #8) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on local streets in what is termed the South Etiwanda area of the City. Generally this area encompasses the area of the City east of Etiwanda Avenue, north of Foothill Boulevard, and south of Highland Avenue within the incorporated area of the City. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets within the South Etiwanda area. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals and street lights can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Any new street lights in areas to be maintained by the District, will become part of the active work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. The normal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a non-refundable deposit will be made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of energizing and six months of ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the street lights in each development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. The costs will be based on the number and type of street lights and based on Southern California Edison Company's rate for street lights. Immediately upon energization of the street lights, those street lights will become a part of the work program of the district. Projected Costs: The majority of the budgeted costs for SLD #8 is for electricity charges for the power to the street lights and traffic signals in the amount of nearly $4,000. A tax delinquency amount is added to arrive at the Revenue Required to maintain the district. This is a projected amount of delinquency tax payments which is anticipated to occur during FY 94/95 based upon actual tax receipts. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD #8 are as follows: 110 Proposed Maintenance BudBet for 1994/9S Total Personnel Maintenance and Operations Contract Services Traffic Signal Adjustment General Liability Electric Utilities Operations and Capital Subtotal: Assessment Administration and General Overhead Tax Delinquency Subtotal: Total Revenue Required: Less: 93/94 District Carryover Assessment Revenue Required: $0.00 $130.00 $0.00 $50.00 $3.860.00 $4,040.00 $710.00 $6,390.00 $7,100.00 $11,140.00 <$4.160.00> $6,980.00 Analysis: It is recommended the assessment rates for FY 94/95 not be increased. No new units have been annexed into the district this year. FY 94/95 Assessment Rate: For FY 94/95 the rate per assessment unit is $193.75. There is no increase in this assessment rate over the FY 93/94 rate. The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district: Unit No. of Unit Rate/ I and Use Type Units Rate Factnr A.U. Revenue Single Family Parcel 36.00 $193.75 1 $193.75 $6.980.00 Total 36.00 $6,980.00 111 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 8 IIDT~) sl JINUlilf 1~ R: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SAN BF" ~RDINO COUNTY ( ,,, {l?(lPMl A f DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA June 1, 1994 Mayor, Members of the City Council and City Manager STAFF REPORT William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Lucinda E. Hackett, Associate Engineer CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORTS AND RESOLUTION FOR THE LEVY OF ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 94/95. NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE IS PROPOSED. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council hold the Public Hearing and approve the Annual Engineer's Reports and Resolution establishing the assessment rates for Landscape Maintenance Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 for the Fiscal Year 1994/95. BACKGROUND / ANALYSIS: Below is an itemized analysis on a district by district basis. To summarize, it is recommended that assessment rates not be increased in any of the Landscape Maintenance Districts for the FY 1994/95. Reasons for this recommendation include water costs savings due to a combination of water conservation efforts, last year's wet winter and mild summer. Water conservation efforts include a program to computerize the irrigation systems for all of the District's maintained landscape areas. So far, all of the district's parks and approximately 25% of the landscape areas within the districts are on the system. In many of the districts the tax delinquency rate has decreased thereby increasing the revenue in those districts. In some districts an increase in the amount of landscape area to maintain has caused an increase in the amount of maintenance and operation costs. These costs will be offset by increases in revenue. In past years any available prior year carryover was used to keep assessments below the annual assessments revenue requirements. In some districts this is still true and has allowed the assessment rate to remain constant. The following, along with reference to the Preliminary Engineer's Reports, identifies proposed FY 94/95 rates. The Preliminary Engineer's Reports identifies the required budget for each district and any carryover used to reduce rates. Cucamonga County Waster District (CCWD) will be increasing its water rates by approximately 5 1/2 % this fiscal year. This is due to the fact that Metropolitan Water District (MWD) is increasing their rates to CCWD. This 5 1/2 % rate increase is being applied to all users in the City including the landscape maintenance districts and will directly affect the operating expenses of these districts. There is sufficient capital within the districts operating budgets this year to absorb the rate increase from CCWD without raising the assessment rates. This is because of water conservation efforts by the City such as Calsense, moisture sensors and Xeriscape landscaping techniques, last year's wet winter and mild summer, lower tax delinquency rates and district carryovers. While this positive financial situation is occurring this fiscal year it may not and probably will not occur next fiscal year. 113 A tax delinquency amount is added to each district's budget to cover anticipated delinquencies in tax payments. If the delinquencies are less than expected, funds within the district can be added to the districts fund balance. Landscape Maintenance District No. I - General City It is recommended that the assessment rate remain at $92.21 for the FY 94/95. Prior year carryover funds will be applied in the district, however they may not be available in future years. Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 -Victoria Planned Community It is recommended that the assessment rate remain at $422.00 for the F"'Y 94/95. LMD #2 has the largest landscape area of any district in the City with 118.62 acres, of which 27.50 acres is parks. Prior year carryovers will be applied but may not be available in the future. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3a - Hyssop It is recommended that the assessment rate remain at $413.74 for the F'Y 94/95. Landscape Maintenance District No.3b -Commercial/Industrial It is recommended that the assessment rate remain at $352.80 per acre for the FY 94/95. Prior year carryover funds will be applied in the district, however they may not be available in future years. 22.87 acres of the Adult Sports Complex will be accepted into the district for maintenance this fiscal year. Landscape Maintenance District No.4 - Tetra Vista It is recommended that the assessment rate remain at $252.50 for the FY 94/95. Approximately 1.25 acres of parking lot for Milliken Park will be accepted into this district for maintenance. Prior year carryovers will be applied but may not be available in the future. Landscape Maintenance District No. 5- Tot Lot It is recommended that the assessment rate remain at $113.29 for the F'Y 94/95. Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 - Caryn It is recommended that the assessment rate remain at $246.97 for the F'Y 94/95. Prior year carryovers will be applied but may not be available in the future. Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 - North Etiwanda It is recommended that the assessment rate remain at $307.05 for the FY 94/95. A refufiding contingency in an amount of $200,Cl)0 will refund those property owners who are current on their property taxes. Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 - South Etiwanda It is recommended 'that the assessment rate remain at $151.45 for the FY 94/95. 114 City Engineer Attachments: Resolutions Engineer's Reports 115 Landscape Maintenance Districts Highlights Landscape Maintenance District 1 - General City Parks maintained by district: Bear Gulch Park - 5.0 acres East and West Beryl Parks - 20.0 acres Old Town Park - 5.0 acres Church Street Park - 6.5 acres Neighborhood Center - 1.75 acres No increase in maintained landscape area. Total maintained area = 68.19 acres Proposed assessment rate is $92.21, no increase over FY 93/94 rate. Landscape Maintenance District 2 - Victoria Planned Community Parks maintained by district: Kenyon Park - 6.5 acres Victoria Groves Park - 6.5 acres Vintage Park - 6.5 acres Windrows Park - 8.0 acres No increase in maintained landscape area. Total maintained area = 118.62 acres Current assessment rate is $422.00, no increase is recommended for FY 94/95. Landscape Maintenance District 3A - Hyssop Consists only of a landscape parkway on Hyssop Drive. Total maintained landscape area = 0.14 acres. No assessment units have been added to the district. The current assessment rate is $413.74, no increase is recommended for the FY 94/95. 116 Landscape Maintenance District 3B - Industrial/Commercial 22.87 acres of the Adult Sports Park will be accepted into the district this fiscal year (this does not include the Stadium, Parking Lots A & B or the new parking lot on the east side of Rochester Avenue). Total maintained landscape area = 32.90 acres. The current assessment rate is $352.80 per acre. No increase is recommended for FY 94/95. Landscape Maintenance District 4 - Terra Vista Planned Community Parks maintained by district: Spruce Park - 5.0 acres Coyote Canyon Park - 5.0 acres West Greenway Park - 5.0 acres Milliken Park - 13.25 acres (w/ addition of parking lot extension) Approximately 1.25 acres of extended parking lot will be added to Milliken Park and accepted into the district for maintenance. Total maintained area = 43.14 acres The current assessment rate is 252.50, no increased is recommended for FY 94/95. Landscape Maintenance District 5 - Tot Lot Total maintained area = 0.33 acres. No assessments units added to the district this fiscal year. The current assessment rate is $113.29, no increase is recommended for FY 94/95. Landscape Maintenance District 6 - Caryn Planned Community Total maintained landscape area = 26.28 acres. 8.39 acres of maintained landscape area will be added to the district this fiscal year. These areas include portions of Milliken Avenue medians and parkways and Banyan Street parkways. No assessment units have been added to the district. The current assessment rate is $246.97, no increase is recommended for FY 94/95. 117 Landscape Maintenance District 7 - North Etiwanda Total maintained landscape area = 13.56 acres A refunding contingency will refund $2C)0,0)0 to those property owners who are current on their property taxes. Current assessment rate is $307.05, no increase is recommended for FY 94/95. Landscape Maintenance District 8 - South Etiwanda Total maintained area = 0.37 acres No new assessment units have been added to the district. The current assessment rate is $151.45, no increase is recommended for FY 94/95. 118 RESOLUTION NO. q~- /C~ q A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPE AND STREET LIGHTING ACT OF 1972. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 4th day of May, 1994, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 94-088 to order the therein described work in connection with the Landscape Maintenance Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 which Resolution of Intention No. 94-088 was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by law, shown by the affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the Office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received and considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplation work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired jurisdiction to order the proposed work. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: That the public interest and convenience requires the levy and collection of assessments within the Landscape Maintenance Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 for the Fiscal Year 1994/95, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of Intention No. 94-088, be done and made; and SECTION 2: Be if further resolved that the report filed by the Engineer is hereby finally approved; and SECTION 3: Be it finally resolved that the assessments for Fiscal Year 1994/95 method of assessment in the Engineer's Report are hereby approved. 119 Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. I (General City) Fiscal Year 1994/95 Approved//~~ '~"~ 'William J.~City Engineer 120 City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (General City Parkways, Medians, Parks and Community Trails) Fiscal Year 94/95 The FY 94/95 annual report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (General City Parkways, Medians, Parks and Community Trails) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Background: Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (LMD #1) represents 29.94 acres of landscape area and 38.25 acres of parks which are located at various sites throughout the City. These sites are not considered to be associated with any one particular area within the City, but rather benefit the entire City on a broader scale. As such, the parcels within this district do not represent a distinct district area as do the City's remaining LMD's. Typically parcels within this district have been annexed upon development. The various sites maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, paseos, street trees, entry monuments, Community Trails and parks. The 38.25 acres of parks consist of Bear Gulch Park which is 5 acres, 20 acres of East and West Beryl Park, 5 acres of Old Town Park. 6.5 acres of Church Street Park and the Rancho Cucamonga Neighborhood Center which consists of 1.75 acres. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: 93/94 94/9~ Ground Cover and Shrubs 21.47 21.47 Turf 1.47 1.47 Parks 28.25 38.25 Community Trails 7.00 7.00 Total Area in LMD #1 68.19Acres 68.19 Acres The ground cover, shrubs and turf areas of the various landscape areas and the parks are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company while the equestrian trails are maintained by the City's Trails and Application Crew. Projected Costs: The majority of the budgeted costs for LMD #1 are for direct maintenance of turf, ground cover and shrubs and the maintenance of the parks. These functions, along with tree maintenance and certain irrigation system repair and testing are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private landscape maintenance company. The City's Trails and Application Crew maintains the equestrian trails within the district. The projected costs to operate and maintain LMD #1 are as follows: Proposed Maintenance Budget for 1994/95 Regular Payroll Fringe Benefits Maintenance and Operations Vehicle Maintenance and Operations Emergency & Routine Vehicle Equipment Rental Contract Services Parkway & Median Landscape Maintenance Park Landscape Maintenance Tree Maintenance Athletic Light Maintenance Tree Inventory Field Data Collection Capital Expenditures A.D.A. Tot Lot Retrofit - Bear Gulch Park Capita[ Project Outlay Capital Equipment Outlay Capital Vehicles Outlay General Liability Water Utilities Electric Utilities Subtotal: Assessment Administration and General Overhead Tax Delinquency Subtotal: $49,510.00 $18,320.00 $39,740.00 $16,310.00 $1,000.00 $285,000.00 $145,600.00 $12,000.00 $13,000.00 $7,550.00 $30,000.00 $147,900.00 $1,550.00 $8,650.00 $8,260.00 $145,000.00 $42.000.00 $971,390.00 $119,220.00 $145.410.00 $264,630.00 Total Revenue Required: Less: 93/94 District Carryover $1,236,020.00 <$294,000.00> Assessment Revenue Required $942,020.00 For 94/95 the Capital Project Outlay budgeted for the district is as follows; $13,000 for a Controller Cabinet Safety Upgrades, $600 for Irrigation Controller Improvements, $5,000 for Tot Lot deck replacement at East Beryl Park, $3,000 for tot lot deck replacement at Church Street Park, $8,000 roof repair at Bear Gulch and Chuch Street Parks, $8,000 for parkway street tree repalcement throughout the district,S12,000 for landscape maintenance material replacement, $1,430 for Haven Avenue Median moisture sensors, $16,250 for irrigation improvements to control parks, $1,200 for MWD lease for East and West Beryl Parks and $79,420 for irrigation improvements to conto[ parkways. Capital Equipment Outlay of $1,550 is for 27% of the purchase price of two shared personnel computers for the Landscape Maintenance Supervisors. Capital Vehicle Outlay of $3,850 is for 12% of a 1/2 ton flat bed truck for the Tree Maintenance Crew and $4,800 for 34% of a 4WD utility vehicle for the Trails Crew. There is also $30,000 under Capital Improvement Projects for Phase I of ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act) Retrofit to Bear Gulch Park. Analysis: Overall budgeted maintenance costs for LMD #1 decreased from $946,710 in 93/94 to $942,040 in 94/95. Proposed water usage costs have decreased $37,000 for the upcoming year, this is due to a combination of water conservation efforts, last year's wet winter and mild summer. These factors along with a 93/94 carryover has allowed the recommended assessment rate to remain constant. FY 94/95 Assessment Rate: The FY 94/95 assessment rate is $92.21, this is no increase over FY 93/94 rate. The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district: Unit No. of Assess. Unit Rate/ I and Use Type Units Rate Factor A.U. Single Family Parcel 7,833 $92.21 1.0 $92.21 Multi-Family Parcel 4.766 $92.21 0.5 $46.11 Totals Revenue $722,270 $219,7650 $942,020 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS1 ,1' im FOOTHILL B...LVO * / / I| 6TH 1ll4l, ULINA1[ m IISlll BOtliW~ (]I~T~) 28 JANUARY lgll BY: Cl~ laYlION CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT #1 ANNEXATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1994/95 MARCH 17, 1993 PM 11738 3 DU- 3AU APRIL 7, 1993 PM 13800 2 DU - 2.AU NOVEMBER 17, 1993 PM 13075 2 DU - 2AU EXHIBIT 'A' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 . ',,; :Z 2 3 LEGEND '--""-o.,--.. ,,'-- ~ DENOTES EQUESTRIAN TRAIL DENOTES STREET LIGHT' SEAL[ I% 80' ..... CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA · COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO PHiMB 11738 STATE OF CALIFORNIA Sx ~m "A" ~6 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. ! STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NC)S. I AND 2 CITY OF RANGHO CUGAMONOA COUNTY OF SAN IEFINARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA . 12,? ~EUGENE P. E:HE ' ~ ~1 ' 'l' ZC~g~ Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (Victoria Planned Community) Fiscal Year 1994/95 ee,~ No. 249 ~ City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (Victoria Planned Community) Fiscal Year 94/95 The FY 94/95 annual report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (Victoria Planned Community) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Background: Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (LMD #2) represents landscape sites throughout the Victoria Planned Community. These sites are associated with areas within Victoria and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels within that community. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those parcels within that planned community. The sites maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, street trees, paseos, Community Trails and parks. The 27.5 acres of parks in Victoria consist of Kenyon Park, Victoria Groves Park, Vintage Park and Windrows Park. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: 93/94 94 / 95 Ground Cover and Shrubs 47.99 47.99 Turf 40.13 40.13 Parks 27.50 27.50 Community Trails 3.00 3.00 Total Area in LMD #2 118.62 Acres 118.62 Acres The ground cover, shrubs and turf areas are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company while the Community Trails are maintained by the City's Trails and Application Crew and the parks are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crews. Projected Costs: The majority of the budgeted costs for LMD #2 are for direct maintenance of turf, ground cover and shrubs. These functions, along with tree maintenance and certain irrigation system repair and testing are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private landscape maintenance company. The City's Trails and Application Crew maintains the equestrian trails and the City's Park Maintenance Crews maintain the parks within the district. The projected costs to operate and maintain LMD #2 are as follows: 130 Proposed Maintenance Budget for 1994/95 Regular Payroll Overtime Salaries Part Time Salaries Fringe Benefits Maintenance and Operations Vehicle Maintenance and Operations Mileage Emergency & Routine Vehicle & Equipment Rental Contract Services Landscape Maintenance Tree Maintenance Capital Expenditures ADA Retrofit to Windrows,Kenyon, Groves & Vintage Parks Capital Improvement Projects Capital Vehicle Outlay Capital Equipment Outlay General Liability Water Utilities Electric Utilities Subtotal: Assessment Administration and General Overhead Tax Delinquency Total Revenue Required: Less: 93/94 District Carryover Assessment Revenue Required $355,830.00 $5,000.00 $4,650.00 $13 1,660.00 $65,720.00 $10,000.00 $0.00 $1,000.00 $539,200.00 $10,000,00 $140,000.00 $336,900.00 $26,700.00 $3,850.00 $11,390.00 $350,000.00 $20.000.00 $2,011,900.00 $143,410.(~ $107,380.00 $250,790.00 $2,262,690.00 <$551#190.00> $1,711,500.00 For FY 94/95, the district budgeted $140,000 for a A.D.A (American's with Disabilities Act) retrofit to Windrows, Kenyon, Groves and Vintage Parks. This retrofit will update the play equipment and surfacing in the tot lots of those parks for A.D.A compliance. Also Budgeted is $8,000 to replace the tot lot bridge at Kenyon Park and $5,000 to replace the exercise station. $320,400 for various renovations and improvements to the parkway and parks irrigation systems. $20,000 for landscape plant material replacement. Capital Equipment Outlay of $3,850 is to purchase equipment for the Park Maintenance Crew, the Tree Maintenance Crew and the Trails and Application Crew. Capital Vehicle Outlay of $26,70) to purchase 17% of a 1.5 ton flat bed truck w/dump, 50% tof a utility truck and 27% Of a 4WD utility vehilce for trails. Analysis: In FY 93/94, the Assessment rate for LMD #2 was 5422.00. It is recommended this rate not increase for the FY 94/95. Part of the reason that the rate did not increase is due to the fact 131 that water usage is down partly because of the implementation of the Calsense Moisture Control irrigation system and partly because of the increased rainfall last season. Also, there is a fairly large FY 93/94 carryover that helps offset the overall costs. There were no new assessments units added to the district this year. FY 94/95 Assessment Rate: The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district: Unit No. of Unit Rate/ [and Use Type Units Ra~e Factor A.U. Revenue Single Family Parcel 3,763.00 $422.00 1.0 $422.00 $1,587,990 Multi-Family Parcel 124.00 $422.00 1.0 $422.00 552,330 Commercial Acre 32.02 $422.00 2.0 $844.00 $27,020 Vacant Acre 418.69 $422.00 0.25 $105.50 $44.160 TOTALS 4,400.74 $1,711,500 132 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT ' ' ' I I I HILLSIDE I _ nO : #,~ I I I I ' ' wS'Lso ' I · I I I DANfAll - - ' .1: H I / / I I I I I · eASEL I d z FOOTHILL_ 8..LVDI __ _ _~ AelOk % % · 4[H 6Tl~ _ _ . MWf | / / II Sr ,,) ' I GTYLMTS LLTNA1[ B01JiARY DISTraCT BOIN~Y C!W. A1T!) ~ JAMUARY 1993 BY: ~7~OFRAPiC!IOCUCAMCB4GA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SAN BERNARD1NO COUNTY CALIFORNIA Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 3a (Hyssop) Fiscal Year 1994/95 ql "' p./No..24973 ~ Approve& Wiliiam J. O'Neili~ty~ngmeer 134 City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Landscape Maintenance District No. 3a (Hyssop Maintenance District) Fiscal Year 94/95 The FY 94/95 annual report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3a (Hyssop Maintenance District) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Background: Landscape Maintenance District No. 3a (LMD #3a) represents a landscape parkway on Hyssop Drive south of Sixth Street. The site is associated with an area within that district and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels within that district. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those parcels within that district. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: 93/94 94/95 Ground Cover and Shrubs 0.14 0.14 Turf 0.00 0.00 Total Area in LMD #3a 0.14 Acres 0.14 Acres The ground cover and shrubs areas are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company. Projected Costs: The majority of the budgeted costs for LMD #3a are for direct maintenance of ground cover and shrubs. These functions, along with tree maintenance and certain irrigation system repair and testing are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private landscape maintenance company. The projected costs to operate and maintain LMD #3a are as follows: 135 Proposed Maintenance Budget for 1994/95 Regular Payroll Fringe Benefits Maintenance and Operations Vehicle Maintenance and Operations Contract Services Landscape and Tree Maintenance Capital Expenditures Landscape Plant Material Renovations Controller Cabinet Safety Improvement General Liability Water Utilities Electric Utilities Subtotal: $0.00 $0.00 $200.00 $0.00 $1,530.00 $1,400.00 $200.00 $30.00 $600.00 $120.00 $4,080.00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead Tax Delinquency $270.00 $220.00 $490.00 Gross Revenue Required: $4,570.00 Less: 93/94 District Carryover <$1.260.00> Total Revenue Required: $3,310.00 For 94/95 the district budgeted $1,400.00 landscape plant material renovation. No vehicle or equipment purchases are budgeted for in 94/95. Analysis: It is recommended the assessment rate for LMD #3a will remain at $413.74 for the FY 94/95 to cover the current maintenance costs of the district. The tax delinquency represents the estimated amount of unpaid taxes within the district. No new assessments were annexed into the district this year. FY 94/95Assessment Rate: The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district: Unit I and Use Type Uni~ Ram Factor Industrial Parcel 8 $413.74 1.0 Rate/. A.U. Revenue $413.74 $3,310.00 136 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 3A ,,iT"II · I [LII~IE B{Im~ IISlll IDIiI/IY Ci~1'~ 28 JANU~Y ~ BY: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SAN BERN A RDINO COUNTY C, ?ORNIA Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 3b ( Commercial / Industrial ) Fiscal Year 1994 / 95 138 City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Landscape Maintenance District No. 3b (Commercial/Industrial Maintenance District) Fiscal Year 94J95 The FY 94/95 annual report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3b (Commercial/Industrial Maintenance District) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Back~'ound: Landscape Maintenance District No. 3b (LMD #3b) represents landscape sites throughout the Commercial/Industrial Maintenance District. These sites are associated with areas within that district and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels within that district. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those parcels within that district. This fiscal year approximately 22.87 acres of the Adult Sports Complex (this does not include the Stadium and its parking lots and maintenance building) will be accepted into this district for maintainance. The Adult Sports Complex with its three softball fields, two soccer fields and 90 foot combination field all with sports field lighting and bleacher seating was designed to cater to the adult sports leagues. For this reason the Complex was located in the commercial and industrial of the City to benefit the adult work force within the area. Detailed maintenance activities for the Complex to be maintained by the district include but are not limited to the following: The repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of the landscaping, including cultivation, irric trimming, spraying, fertilization or treating for disease or injury: the removal of trim ~s, rubbish, debris and other solid waste, the maintenance , repair and replacem~:::t as necessary of all irrigation systems, the removal of graffitti from walls immediately adjacent to the cultivated areas, the maintenance, repair and replacement as necessary of the parking lot surfacing and striping, parking lot sweeping, the maintenance and repair of all lighting facilities and the maintenance and repair for restroom facilities. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: 93/94 94/95 Ground Cover and Shrubs 6.74 6.74 Tuff 3.29 3.29 Parks 0.00 22.87 Total Area in LMD #3b 10.03 Acres 32.90Acres The turf, ground cover and shrubs areas are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company. 139 Projected Costs: The majority of the budgeted costs for LMD #3b are for direct maintenance of turf, ground cover and shrubs. These functions, along with tree maintenance and certain irrigation system repair and testing are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private landscape maintenance company. The projected costs to operate and maintain LMD #3b are as follows: Proposed Maintenance Budget for 1994/95 Regular Payroll Fringe Benefits Maintenance and Operations Vehicle Maintenance and Operations Emergency & Reg. Vehicle & Equipment Rental Contract Services Landscape Maintenance -Parkways & Medians Tree Maintenance Landscape Maintenance - Sports Complex Complex Drainage Capital Expenditures Controller Cabinet Safety Improvements Landscape Plant Material Renovations Haven Median Irrigation improvements Calsense Connections to Central Capital Equipment Outlay / Equipment General Liability Water Utilities Electric Utilities Subtotal: Assessment Administration and General Overhead Tax Delinquency Subtotal: Gross Revenue Required: Less: 93/94 District Carryover Total Revenue Required: $65,360.00 $24,180.00 $28,060.00 $1,030.00 $1,000.00 $162,780.00 $30,000.00 $92,040.00 $15,000.00 $3.200.00 $10.000.00 $7 950.00 $10000.00 $6 450.00 $5 860.00 $136 000.00 $81,200.00 $680,110.00 $39,150.00 $25,640.00 $64,790.00 $744,9tK).{}0 <$230,290.00> $514,610.00 Analysis: It is recommended that the assessment rate remain at $352.80 for the fiscal year 1994/95. The tax delinquency represents the amount of unpaid taxes within the district. FY 94195 Assessment Rate: The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district: 140 Unit No. of Assess. I and Use Type Units Ra~e Industrial/Comm. Acre 1341.02 $352.80 Other Revenue: User fees from Sports Field Lighting TOTAL Unit Factor 1.0 Rate / A.U. $352.80 Revenue $473,110 $41,500 $514,610 141 LANDSCAPE MAIN'~'ENANCE DISTRICT 3B CiW..IT~) a JIIUIIIY 1113 !IY: SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY CALIFORNIA Legal Descriptions Parcel Being portions of Lot Nos. 20, 21, 22; and portions of the westerly 1/2 and the westerly 300 feet of the easterly 1/2 of Lots 23 and 24 according to the Map of Rochester as per plat recorded in Book 9, Page 20 of Maps, in the Office of the Recorder of the County of San Bernardino, State of California, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the northeast corner of the southerly 50.00 feet of the westerly 300 feet of the easterly 1/2 of said Lot 24 according to said Nap of Rochester; THENCE N 00 degrees 09 minutes 28 seconds E along the easterly line of the westerly 1/2 of the easterly 1/2 of said Lots 24 and 23 a distance of 617.60 feet; THENCE N 89 degrees 34 minutes 46 seconds E a distance of 276.30; THENCE N 00 degrees 25 minutes 14 W seconds a distance of 43.00 feet; THENCE S 89 degrees 34 minutes 46 seconds W a distance of 133.93 feet to a point on a non-tangent curve concave southerly, having a radius of 78.00 feet, a radial through said point bears N 13 degrees 25 minutes 24 seconds W; ~ westerly along said curve through a central angle of 09 degrees 37 minutes 01 seconds an arc length of 13.09 feet to a point on a tangent curve concave northerly having a radius of 78.00 feet; ~ westerly along said curve through a central angle of 22 degrees 37 minutes 12 seconds an arc length of 30.79 feet to a point on a tangent curve concave northerly having a radius of 78.00 feet; THBECB westerly along said curve through a central angle of 22 degrees 37 minutes 12 seconds an arc length of 30.79 feet t o point on a tangent curve concave northerly having a radius of 310.00 feet; Tli~C~westerly along said curve through a central angle of 15 degrees 30 minutes 43 seconds an arc length of 83.93 feet to a point on a non-tangent line, a radial line to said curve; THENCE N 15 degrees 05 minutes 29 seconds E along said line a distance of 10.00 feet to a point on a non-tangent curve concave northeasterly having a radius of 300.00 feet, a radial through said point bears S 15 degrees 05 minutes 29 seconds W; THBK~ northwesterly along said curve through a central angle of 25 degrees 05 minutes 21 seconds an arc length of 131.37 feet to a point on a tangent line; TBBI~CE N 49 degrees 49 minutes 10 seconds W along said line a distance of 33.50 feet to a point on a non-tangent curve concave northwesterly having a radius of 368.50 feet a radial through said point bears S 49 degrees 49 minutes 10 seconds E; TB~CE northeasterly along said curve through a central angle of 20 degrees 32 minutes 20 seconds an arc length of 132.10 feet to a point on a tangent line; THENCE along said line N 19 degrees 38 minutes 30 seconds E a distance of 131.18 feet; ~ N 71 degrees 21 minutes 30 seconds a distance of 46.22 feet; THENCE N 70 degrees 21 minutes 30 seconds W a distance of 46.22 feet; THEI~CE N 19 degrees 38 minutes 30 seconds E a distance of 8.32 feet to a point on a tangent curve concave southwesterly having a radius of 12.00 feet; THBMCE northeasterly northerly and northwesterly along said curve through a Legal Descriptions (continued) central angle of 103 degrees 02 minutes 30 seconds an arc length of 21.58 feet to a point on a tangent line; T!~E N 83 degrees 24 minutes 00 seconds W along said line a distance of 2.35 feet; T~ S 89 degrees 28 minutes 30 seconds W a distance of 201.56 feet; TM N 85 degrees 05 minutes 12 seconds W a distance of 65.03 feet; T~CR west a distance of 89.63 feet; TMEMCE S 45 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds W a distance of 35.62 feet; TH~IICE south a distance of 58.38 feet; THEMCM west a distance of 36.00 feet; TI[EMCE north a distance of 116.54 feet; THENCE N 45 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds W a distance of 35.62 feet; T~CE west a distance of 116.54 feet; TI~CE north a distance of 36.00 feet; THEMCB east a distance of 58.38 feet; TH~MC~N 45 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds R a distance of 35.62 feet; T~CE north a distance of 89.63 feet; TH~MCR N 04 degrees 54 minutes 48 seconds W a distance of 65.03 feet; THMMCR N 00 degrees 31 minutes 30 seconds E a distance of 189.49 feet to a point on a non-tangent curve concave northerly having a radius of 52.50 feet; TMwesterly along said curve through a central angle of 07 degrees 06 minutes 43 seconds an arc length of 6.52 feet to a point on a tangent curve concave southwesterly having a radius of 35.50 feet; TMBMC~ westerly along said curve through a central angle of 26 degrees 26 minutes 17 seconds an arc length of 16.38 feet to a point an a curve concave southeasterly having a radius of 2.50 feet; T~ westerly southwesterly and southerly along said curve through a central anglA of 96 degrees 23 minutes 14 seconds an arc length of 4.21 feet to a point on a tangent line; T~MMCE S 00 degrees 15 minutes 23 seconds E along said line a distance of 16.35 feet; TIM S 89 degrees 44 minutes 37 seconds W a distance of 15.53 feet to a point on a tangent curve concave southeasterly having a radius of 310.50; T~ westerly and southwesterly along said curve through a central angle of 62 degrees 10 minutes 21 seconds an arc length of 336.93 feet to a point on a non-tangent line; T~CB N 62 degrees 20 minutes 12 seconds W along said line a distance of 83.03 feet to the westerly line of said Lots 20, 21, 22, 23 and 24; T~C] S 00 degrees 09 minutes 59 seconds W along said line a distance of 1367.79 feet to the northwest comer of the southerly 50.00 feet of said Lot 24; TBB~Cl M 89 degrees 28 minutes 07 seconds M along the southerly line of said Lot 24 a distance of 41.19 feet; TI~MCB N 44 degrees, 28 minutes, 07 seconds B a distance of 33.94 feet; TH~MCB N 89 degrees, 28 minutes, 07 seconds E a distance of 52.50 feet; T!~CB N 45 degrees 31 minutes 53 seco~s W a distance of 33.94 feet; THEMCB N 00 degrees 31 minutes 53 seconds W a distance of 14.00 feet to a point on a tangent curve concave westerly having a radius of 320.50; THEMCB northerly along said curve through a central angle of 22 degrees 26 minutes 59 seconds an arc length of 125.58 feet to a tangent line; TMB~IC~ N 22 degrees 58 minutes 52 seconds W along said line a distance of 61.96 feet to a point on a non-tangent curve concave southerly having a radius of 62.47 feet; TMMMCB easterly along said curve through a central angle 35 degrees 52 minutes 13 seconds an arc length of 39.11 feet to a point on a tangent curve concave northwesterly having a radius of 2.50 144 Legal Descriptions (continued) feet; TRRNCE easterly, northeasterly and northerly along said curve through a central angle of 90 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds an arc length of 3.93 feet to a point on atangent line; TIIBIIC~ N 00 degrees 31 minutes 53 seconds W along said ine a distance of 16.50 feet; TH~IICB N 89 degrees 28 minutes 07 seconds g a distance of 420.35 feet to a point on a tangent curve concave southwesterly having a radius of 20.00 feet; THENCE easterly, southeasterly and southerly along said curve through a central angle of 90 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds an arc length of 31.42 feet to a point on a tangent line; TBBIICB S 00 degrees 31 minutes 53 seconds E along said line a distance of 228.50 feet to a point on the southerly line of said Lot 24; TB~IICE N 89 degrees 28 minutes 07 seconds g along said line a distance of 384.02 feet to the THI/B ~OINT OF BBGI!fiIING. AREA PARCEl, abe = 996,430.01 Square Feet or 22.87 Acres MAP TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION IEXHIBIT "A") EXHIBIT "B". sEE BEE DETAIL "C" ~ LINE LOT 20 20 .~'~"~ ,.,,..-t "~x.~ ~. I-7 ARCEL 'B' 22 ,4~~ ~ ... 2 ~ SOUTHER INE LOT 22 E 3 EASEMENT FOR STREET. HIGHWAY. ~ND RELATED PURPOSES P.~GE ! OF IO 4 147 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT #3B ANNEXATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1994/95 FEBRUARY 17, 1993 PM 14318 3.47 AC - 3.47 AU MARCH 17, 1993 CUP 92-19 10.37 AC - 10.37 AU MARCH 17, 1993 DR 92-07 1.5 AC - 1.5 AU 148 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM I..ANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE. DISTRICT N0.3 B STREET LIGHTING' MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 6' .. · CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO .-. STATE OF CALIFORNIA /~,~-- EXHIBIT 'A' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ST LA NDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 38 REET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 6 V/CINITy H,4P r o 10807 JERSEY BI. VI). SCALE: I"f CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA' COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA EXHIBIT 'A' ASSESSMENT DIAGR'AM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO S. 1 AND 6 Z. IZl ,IC ~ ~ Per. 4 Per. · ® ':" Per. Z J33 Per. Per. S - a,- r'lr'Ti/ -- STFTI::CT " · , ,, ,. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO (~ .,~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA 151 Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. (Terra Vista Planned Community) 4 Fiscal Year 1994/95 152 City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 (Tetra Vista Planned Community) Fiscal Year 94/95 The FY 94/95 annual report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community ) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Bacl<~'ound: Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 (LMD #4) represents landscape sites throughout the Terra Vista Planned Community. These sites are associated with areas within that district and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels within that district. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those parcels within that district. The various landscape sites in Terra Vista that are maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, street trees, paseos and parks. There is approximateIt 1.25 acres of parking lot for Milliken Park added to the district this year for maintenance. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: · 93/9,l 94/95 Ground Cover and Shrubs 8.35 8.35 Tuff 6.58 6.58 Parks 27.00 28.25 Total Area in LMD #4 41.89 Acres 43.14Acres The haft, ground cover and shrubs areas that make up the parkways, median islands and paseos are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company, the parks are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crews. Projected Costs: The majority of the budgeted costs for LMD #4 are for direct maintenance of turf, ground cover and shrubs. These functions, along with tree maintenance and certain irrigation system repair and testing are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private landscape maintenance company. The projected costs to operate and maintain LMD ~ are as follows: Proposed Maintenance Budget for 1994/95 Regular Payroll Part Time Salaries Fringe Benefits Maintenance and Operations Mileage Vehicle Maintenance and Operations Emergency & Routine Vehicle & Equipment Rental Contract Services Landscape Maintenance Tree Maintenance Capital Expenditures Capital Outlay / Projects Terra Vista / Base Line Median Renovation ADA Retrofit: Milliken & Coyote Canyon Parks Capital Outlay / Equipment Capital Outlay / Vehicles General Liability Water Utilities Electric Utilities Subtotal: Assessment Administration and General Overhead Tax Delinquency Subtotal Gross Revenue Required: Less: 93/94 District Carryover Total Revenue Required: $168,980.00 $4,650.00 $62,520.00 $42,600.00 $0.00 $30,000.00 $1,000.00 $211,990.00 $7,000.()O $126 930.00 $413.780.00 $90.000.00 $2 300.00 $41.040.00 $5 180.00 $120,000.00 $23.150.00 $1,351,120.00 $82,660.00 $106,440.00 $189,100.00 $1,540,220.00 <$494,670.00> $1,045,550.00 For FY 94/95, the district budgeted $90,000 for a A.D.A (American's with Disabilities Act) retrofit to Milliken and Coyote Canyon Parks. This retrofit will update the play equipment and surfacing in the tot lots of those parks for A.D.A Compliance. Also Budgeted is $5,000 for exercise station replacement, $7400 for controller cabinet retrofits to meet new code requirements, $3,730 for Haven Avenue Median irrigation upgrades and $5,000 for drainage correction to West Greenway, $95,800 for various renovations and improvements to the parkway and parks irrigation systems and $10,000 for landscape plant material replacement. Capital Equipment Outlay of $2,300 is to purchase equipment for the Park Maintenance Crew, the Tree Maintenance Crew and the Trails and Application Crew. Capital Vehicle Outlay of $41,040 to purchase 65% of a 1.5 ton flat bed truck w/dump, 50% of a utility truck and 19% of a 4WD utility vehilce for trails. Analysis: Overall budgeted maintenance costs for LMD #4 increased from $1,033,740 in FY 93/94 to $1,045,550 in FY 94/95. Proposed water usage costs have decreased $10,930 for the upcoming year, this is due to a combination of water conservation efforts, last year's wet winter and mild 154 summer. These factors along with a 93/94 carryover has allowed the recommended assessment rate to remain constant. In FY 93/94 the assessment rate for LMD #4 was 252.50/A.U. it is recommended not to increase for the FY 94/95. Attached is the Assessment Rate Computation Chart. FY 94/95 Assessment Rate: The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district: Unit No. of Rate/. I and Use Type Units A.U. Revenue Single Family Parcel 1659.00 $252.50 $418,900 Multi Parcel 2610.00 $222.00 $579,420 Commercial Acre 122.20 $382.99 $46,80(.) Va ca n t Acre 11.44 537.12 $430 TOTAL $1,045,550 155 LMD 4 Assessment Rate Computation FY 94~95 Assessment Units Single Family Multi Family Commercial Vacant Land 1,934.00 2,215.00 137.21 30.14 (AU) (AU) (Ac) (Ac) Median Maintenance Park Maintenance Parkway Maintenance Benefit Ratio Single Family Multi Family I .iX) I,(X) I 1.00 1.0) 050 Cc~mmerciaJ 2 .(~) 2.0) O,(X) Vacant Land 2.00 00() 0.ix) Median Maintenance Park Maintenance Parkway Maintenance Benefit Units 4,483.70 4,423.42 3,041.5¢) Single Family 1,934.00 1,934.00 1,934.(10 Multi Family 2,215.tk'1 2,215.00 1,107.50 Commercial 274.42 274.42 0.00 Vacant Land 6028 0.00 O.(K) Median Maintenance Park Maintenance Parkway Maintenance % of Units 1130.0°/o 100.0% 100.0% Single Family 431% 43.7% 63.6% Multi Family 49.4% 50.1% 36.4% Commercial 6.1% 6.2% 0.0% Vacant Land 1.3% 0.0% 0.0% Median Maintenance Park Maintenance Parkway Maintenance Total Maint. Cost $83,216.07 $764,967.60 $185,556.33 $1,033,740.00 Single Family $35,894.44 $334,457.80 $11~989.79 $488~42.03 Multi Family $41,109.71 $383,052.76 $6~566.54 $491,729.01 Commercial $5,093.15 $47,457.04 $0.00 $52,550.19 Vacant Land $1,118.78 $1,118.78 Assessment Rate Single Family $252.50 Multi Family $222.00 Commercial $382.99 Vacant Land $37.12 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 4 CliEiTgl) 28 JAI~AEY Ill3 BY: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SAN BER~"RDINO COUNTY P....,R~RNIA Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. (Tot Lot) 5 Fiscal Year 1994 / 95 158 City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 (Tot Lot Maintenance District) Fiscal Year 94J95 The FY 94/95 annual report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 (Tot Lot Maintenance District) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Bacl<ground: Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 (LMD #5) represents a landscaped Tot Lot, located on the southwest corner of Andover Place and Bedford Drive. This site is associated with a group of 44 single family parcels which all have a common usage of the Tot Lot such that any benefit derived from the landscaping can be directly attributed to those particular parcels. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those specific parcels. There is only one site maintained by the district. It consists of a Tot Lot and a small amount of shrubs beds and ground cover. The quantities of maintained areas consist of: GroundCover and Shrubs Total Area in LMD #5 92/93 93/94 0.33 0.33 0.33 Acres 0.33 Acres The ground cover and shrubs areas are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company. Projected Costs: The majority of the budgeted costs for LMD #5 are for direct maintenance of ground cover and shrubs. These functions, along with tree maintenance and certain irrigation system repair and testing are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private landscape maintenance company. The projected costs to operate and maintain LMD #5 are as follows: 159 Proposed Maintenance Budget for 1994/95 Regular Payroll Fringe Benefits Maintenance and Operations Vehicle Maintenance and Operations Contract Services Landscape Maintenance Capital Expenditures Mandatory A.D.A Survey for Tot Lot Irrigation Upgrades to Replace Risers w/Pop Ups Landscape Material Renovation Irrigation Upgrades to Central Control Controller Cabinet Safety Upgrade General Liability Water Utilities Electric Utilities Subtotal: Assessment Administration and General Overhead Tax Delinquency Add: 93/94 Gross Revenue Required: District Deficit Total Revenue Required: $0 $0 $490.00 $70.00 $1,060.00 $0 $0 $0 $0 $200.00 $30.00 $280.00 $130.00 $2,260.00 $610.00 $90.00 $700.00 $2960.00 $2020.00 $4,980.00 For 94/95 the district budgeted $200.00 for a controller cabinet safety upgrade. Analysis: The FY 94/95 rate of assessment is $113.29. It is recommended that there be no increase from FY 93/94. No new assessment units have been annexed in the district. FY 94/95 Assessment Rate: The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district: Unit No. of Rate/. I and Use Type Unit~ Rate Factor A.U. Revenue Single Family Parcel 44 $113.29 1.0 $113.29 $4,980.00 160 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTANCE 5 IITNATE m ilS1RICl eOLm~ SAN BERN ARDINO COUNTY C, FORNIA ....... Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. (Caryn Planned Community) 6 Fiscal Year 1994/95 Approved: I ~n./-~ "3/- William J. '~eil, City Engineer 162 City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 (Caryn Planned Community) Fiscal Year 94/95 The FY 94/95 annual report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 (Caryn Planned Community ) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Bacl~j'ound: Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 (LMD #6) represents landscape sites throughout the Caryn Planned Community. These sites are associated with areas within that district and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels within that district. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those parcels within that district. The various landscape sites in Caryn that are maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, .street trees and paseos. 8.39 acres of maintained landscape area will be accepted into the district this fiscal year, these areas include portions of Milliken Ave parkway and median, Banyan Street parkway and various landscape areas for Tracts Nos. 13748, 13857 and 13758. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: 93/94 94/95 Ground Cover and Shrubs 12.09 19.34 Turf 2.89 3.94 Community Trails 3.00 3.tK) Total Area in LMD #6 17.89 Acres 26.28Acres The turf, ground cover and shrubs areas that make up the parkways, median islands and paseos are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company, while the Community Trails are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crew. Projected Costs: The majority of the budgeted costs for LMD #6 are for direct maintenance of turf, ground cover and shrubs. These functions, along with tree maintenance and certain irrigation system repair and testing are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private landscape maintenance company. The projected costs to operate and maintain LMD #6 are as follows: 16,3 Proposed Maintenance Budget for 1994/95 Regular Payroll Fringe Benefits Maintenance and Operations Vehicle Maintenance and Operations Emergency & Reg. Vehicle Rental Contract Services Landscape Maintenance Tree Maintenance Capital Expenditures Landscape Plant Material Renovation Capital Outlay/Equipment Controller Cabinet Safety Upgrades Tree Replanting General Liability Water Utilities Electric Utilities Subtotal: Assessment Administration and General Overhead Tax Delinquency Subtotal: Gross Revenue Required: Less: 93/94 District Carryover Total Revenue Required: $35,930.00 $13,290.00 $4,540.00 $1,910.00 $500.00 $160,130.00 $10,500.00 $15,000.00 $1,080.00 $3,000.00 $1,500.00 $2,670.00 $60,000.00 $2.550.00 $312,600.00 $27,000.00 $13,410.00 $40,410.00 $353,010.00 < $64,050.00> $288,960.00 Analysis: The FY 94/95 rate of assessment is $246.97. It is recommended there be no increase from FY 93/94. No new assessment units were annexed in the district. The tax delinquency represents the projected amount of unpaid taxes within the district. FY 94/95 Assessment Rate: The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district: Unit No. of Rate/. I and Use Type Unit~ Rate Factor A.U. Revenue Single Family Parcel 1,170.00 $246.97 1.0 $246.97 $288,960.00 164 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 6 I I I T I I I HILLSIDE I [ #a"'~ I I I ..... , - .o --- I I s I, LSO,_~E.. 24T, sr K"" " / ~ML ~ AVE __ ~,, ~ x FOOTHILL B~VD _ _ -09 ' ' { I ST. _ _ ST 3" ULlilAI[ m O51111 BOINIARY IIZIT!I 28 JANUAiiY 113 BY: CITY OF RANCHO ~:UCAkIONGA SAN BERN A RDINO COUNTY Ca. DRNIA Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. (North Etiwanda) 7 Fiscal Year 1994/95 William J. City Engineer 166 City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 (Etiwanda North) Fiscal Year 94/95 The FY 94/95 annual report for Landscape Maintenance District No.7 (Etiwanda North) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Background: Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 (LMD #7) represents landscape sites throughout the Etiwanda North area. These sites are associated with areas within that district and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels within that district. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those parcels within that district. The various landscape sites in the Etiwanda North area that are maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, street trees, Community Trails and paseos. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: 93/94 94/95 Ground Cover and Shrubs 7.54 7.54 Tuff 4.02 4.02 Community Trails 2.00 2.00 Total Area in LMD #7 13.56Acres 13.56 Acres The tuff, ground cover and shrubs areas that make up the parkways, median islands and paseos are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company, while the Community Trails are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crew. Pmjected Costs: The majority of the budgeted costs for LMD #7 are for direct maintenance of turf, ground cover and shrubs. These functions, along with tree maintenance and certain irrigation system repair and testing are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private landscape maintenance company. The projected costs to operate and maintain LMD #7 are as follows: 167 Proposed Maintenance Budl~et for 1994/95 Regular Payroll Fringe Benefits Maintenance and Operations Vehicle Maintenance and Operations Emergency & Routine Vehicle & Equipment Rental Contract Services Landscape Maintenance Tree Maintenance Capital Expenditures Landscape Plant Material Renovations Weed Abatement for N.E. Community Park Site Capital Outlay / Equipment Controller Cabinet Safety Retrofit Tree Replantings Calsense Connections to Central General Liability Water Utilities Electric Utilities Assessment Administration and General Overhead Tax Delinquency Refunding Contingency Subtotal: Subtotal: Gross Revenue Required: Less: 93/94 District Carryover Total Revenue Required: $2,300.00 $850.00 $3,980.00 $1,330.00 $500.00 $83,500.00 $18,500.00 $10,000.00 $6,000.00 $1,500.00 $1,400.00 $5,500.00 $25,000.00 $1,510.00 $16,000.00 $740.00 $178,610.00 $26,740.00 $204,070.00 $200.0(X).00 $430,810.00 $609,420.00 <$306,050.00> $303,370.00 For 94/95 the district budgeted $10,000 for landscape plant material renovation and $6,000 for weed abatement at the Northeast Community Park site. There is $1,500 for equipment purchases, $1,400 for controller cabinet safety retrofit, $5,500 for tree replantings and $25,000 for calsense connections to central control budgeted for in 94/95. The tax delinquency represents the projected amount of unpaid taxes within the district. The refunding contingency in an amount of $200,000 will refund those property owners who are current on their property taxes a surplus of funds within the district. Analysis: The FY 94/95 rate of assessment is $307.05 per unit. It is recommended there be no increase from FY 93/94. There has been only one assessemnt unit annexed to the district. Each single family property owner will receive a refund of approximately $200 during the FY 94/95. The reason for this refund is a surplus of funds due to the fact that properties have been annexed into the district but all of the landscape improvements for those areas have not been completed and as of yet have not been accepted into the district for maintenance. In future years landscape areas 168 within the annexed tracts will come on line and add to the overall maintenance costs of the distrist. FY 94/95 Assessment Rate: The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district: Unit No. of Rate/. I and Use Type Units Rate Factor A.U. Single Family Parcel 988.00 $307.05 1.0 $307.05 Revenue $303,370.00 169 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 7 CIIY LMIS tUIM1E IlOtm~Y CElTEl) 28 JANUARY 113 BY: GIS DIVI:~ON MII-IlI~,I ~ ~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAI~ONGA SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY C. AI.IF~RNIA Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda) Fiscal Year 1994 / 95 171 City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda Area) Fiscal Year 94/95 The FY 94/95 annual report for Landscape Maintenance District No.8 (South Etiwanda Area) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Back~ound: Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 (LMD #8) represents landscape sites throughout the South Etiwanda area. These sites are associated with areas within that district and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels within that district. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those parcels within that district. The various landscape sites in the South Etiwanda area that are maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, street trees, Community Trails and paseos. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: 93/94 94/95 Ground Cover and Shrubs 0.23 0.23 Tuff 0.06 0.14 Community Trails 0.00 0.00 Total Area in LMD #8 0.29 Acres 0.37 Acres The turf, ground cover and shrubs areas that make up the parkways, are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company, while the Community Trails are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crew. Projected Costs: The majority of the budgeted costs for LMD #8 are for direct maintenance of turf, ground cover and shrubs. These functions, along with tree maintenance and certain irrigation system repair and testing are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private landscape maintenance company. The projected costs to operate and maintain LMD #8 are as follows: 172 Proposed Maintenance Budget for 1994/95 Regular Payroll Fringe Benefits Maintenance and Operations Vehicle Maintenance and Operations Contingency Tree Replacement Contract Service: Landscape Maintenance Tree Maintenance Capital Expenditures Plant Material Renovation Irrigation Upgrades to Central Control Capital Outlay / Equipment Landscape Plant Material Replacement Controller Cabinet Safety Upgrade General Liability Water Utilities Electric Utilities Subtotal: Assessment Administration and General Overhead Tax Delinquency Subtotal: Gross Revenue Required: Less: 93/94 District Carryover Total Revenue Required: $0 $0 $600.00 $370.00 $0.00 $4,000.00 $6,500.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $2,000.00 $200.00 $150.00 $1,360.00 $80.00 $15,260.00 $1,780.00 $4,150.00 $5,930.00 $21,190.00 <$4,840.00> $16,350.00 For 94/95 the district budgeted $2,000 for landscape plant material replacement and $200 for controller cabinet safety upgrade as capital improvement projects. The tax delinquency represents the projected amount of unpaid taxes within the district. Analysis: The FY 94/95 rate of assessment is $151.45. It is recommended there be no increase from FY 93/94. No new assessment units have been annexed in the district. FY 94]95 Assessment Rate: The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district: Unit No. of Rate/. I and Use Type Unit~ Rat~ Factor A.U. Revenue Single Family Parcel 108.00 $151.45 1.0 $151.45 516,350.00 173 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 8 ,iT'1 s I I I I I HILLill)E_ I , : ~;~ I I I I I _ _ _ , , _ o ~s'~'~so.' v~ I I I I I I . / H!GHL~O , , ~ S/~I I I dTH ~l ...... II .... mmll'l' LLTIdA1E BQIIIWtY DB111CT BOIN)ARY CRF. ITD) sl Ji~UllY 1963 lilt: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SAN BERN A RDINO COUNTY CA, DRNIA DATE: TO: FROM BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT June 1, 1994 Mayor, Members of City Council & City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Lucinda E. Hackett, Associate Engineer CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT AND RESOLUTION FOR THE LEVY THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN THE PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PD- 85) FOR FISCAL YEAR 1994/95. NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE IS PROPOSED. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council hold the public hearing and approve the Annual Engineer's Report and attached Resolution authorizing the levy and collection of assessments within Park and Recreation Improvement District (PD-85) for the Fiscal Year 1994/95. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: Park and Recreation Improvement District was created to provide funds to finance the cost of construction, maintenance, operation and debt payment of Heritage Community Park and Red Hill Community Park. Heritage Community Park is a 40 acre facility located on the southwest comer of Hillside Road and Beryl Street. Red Hill Community Park is 42 acres and is located on the southwest comer of Base Line Road and Vineyard Avenue. The District boundary includes all of the City of Rancho Cucamonga with the general exception of land east of the Deer Creek Channel and the Victoria and Tetra Vista Planned Communities. Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD) will be increasing their water rates by Approximately 5 1/2% this fiscal year. This is due to the fact that Metropolitan Water District (MWD) is increasing their rates to CCWD. This 5 1/2% rate increase is being applied to all users in the City including PD - 85 and will directly affect the operating expenses of this district. There is sufficient capital within the district's operating budgets this year to absorb the rate increase from CCWD without increasing the assessment rate. This is because of water conservation efforts by the City such as Calsense, moisture sensors, last year's wet winter and mild summer, lower tax delinquency rates and district carryovers. While this positive financial situation is occurring this fiscal year it may not and probably will not occur next fiscal year. Pursuant to the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, each year the City Council must hold a public hearing and approve an annual Engineer's Report which reviews the status of the district and discloses the projected revenue and expenditures which establish the assessment rate for the next fiscal year. The assessment rate increased from $35.00 to $52.00 during the 1991/92 Fiscal Year, this rate will remain at $52.0) for the 1994/95 Fiscal Year. Assessments for PD-85 will be levied according to the following schedule: 175 Definition Assessment per Parcel Single Family Residential Less than 1.50 acres 3.51 acres to 7.00 acres 7.01 acres to 14.00 acres 14.01 acres to 25.00 acres 25.01 acres and Larger $52.00 $26.00 $ 182 $364.00 $728.O0 $1,300.00 Respectful itted. William. Ij~ City Engineer Attachments: Resolutions Preliminary Engineer's Report 176 Park and Recreation Improvement District Highlights Park and recreation Improvement District (PD -85) District consists of two regional parks; Heritage Community Park - 40.0 acres Redhill Community Park - 42.0 acres No capital improvements in the district this fiscal year. Current assessment rate is $52.00, no increase is recommended for FY 94/95. 177 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN THE PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 85-PD (HERITAGE AND RED HILL COMMUNITY PARKS) WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 4th day of May, 1994, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 94-090 to order the therein described work in connection with the Park and Recreation Improvement District which Resolution of Intention No. 94-090 was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by law, shown by the affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the Office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received and considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplation work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired jurisdiction to order the proposed work. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1.' That the public interest and convenience requires the levy and collection of assessments within the Park and Recreation Improvement District for the Fiscal Year 1994/95, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of Intention No. 94-090, be done and made; and SECTION 2: Be if further resolved that the report filed by the Engineer is hereby finally approved; and SECTION 3: Be it finally resolved that the assessments for Fiscal Year 1994/95 method of assessment in the Engineer's Report are hereby approved. 178 Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga PD-8S Fiscal Year 1994/95 ee'~'-~ NO. 24953 _ William J. Engm~r 179 City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Report PD-85 Fiscal Year 1994/95 AUTHORITY FOR REPORT This report for the 94/95 fiscal year is prepared pursuant to the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter~ 1, Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15, Section 22500 of the Streets and Highways code. Provisions for this annual assessment are included in Chapter 3 of the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. The purpose of this report is to set forth findings and the assessment analysis for the annual levy of assessments for the Parks and Recreation Improvement District No. PD-85, thereafter referred to as "the District". This District, using direct benefit assessments, has been created to provide funds to finance the cost of construction, maintenance, operation and debt payment of Heritage Community Park and Red Hill Community Park in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. FINDINGS Section 22573, Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, requires assessments to be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. The section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The means of determining whether or not a parcel will benefit from the improvements is contained in the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7, commencing with Section 5000 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California). The 1972 Act also provides for the classification of various areas within an assessment district into benefit areas where, by reason of variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive differing degrees of all territory receiving substantially the same degree of benefit from the improvements and may consist of contiguous or noncontiguous areas. As the assessments are levied on the basis of benefit, they are considered a user's fee, not a tax; and, therefore, are not governed by Article XIIIA. Properties owned by public agencies, such as a city, county, state, or the federal government, are not assessable without the approval of the particular agency and, normally, are not assessed. Certain other parcels used for railroad mainline right-of-way, public utility transmission fight-of-way, and common areas are also exempt from assessment. The assessment for mobile home parks will be based upon underlying lot acreage. DISTRICT ANALYSIS Improvement District Boundary The improvement district includes all of the City of Rancho Cucamonga with the general exception of land east of Deer Creek Channel and the Victoria & Tetra Vista Planned Communities. 180 All parcels of real property affected are more particularly described in maps prepared in accordance with Section 327 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, which are on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor in the Hall of Records, 172 West Third Street, San Bernardino, California and which are hereby made a part hereof by reference. B. District Name City of Rancho Cucamonga Parks and Recreation Improvement District No. PD - 85. C. Facilities The existing works of improvement are generally described as follows: 1.The construction of Heritage Community Park including, but not limited to, grading, planting, irrigation, onsite roads, sidewalks, parking lots, lighting, restrooms, equestrian facilities, playground equipment, picnic facilities, athletic facilities, and walking, jogging and equestrian trails. 2.The construction of Red Hill Community Park including, but not limited to, grading, planting, irrigation, onsite roads, sidewalks, parking lots, lighting, waterscape, restrooms, senior citizen facilities, playground equipment, picnic facilities, major lighted athletic facilities, jogging trail, underground storm drain system, and adjacent public street improvements. The assessment rate for the 93/94 FY is $52.00, this rate will not increase for the 94/95 FY. It is estimated that this assessment rate will cover the districts maintenance and operation expenses for the 94/95 FY. ESTIMATE OF WORK The Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 permits carrying forward surpluses or recovering deficits in subsequent fiscal years. Costs for the district will be reviewed annually. Any surplus credited against assessment or any deficits shall be included in the assessment for the following fiscal year. 181 Proposed Maintenance Budget: 94/95 Regular Payroll Fringe Benefits Vehicle Maint../Operations Maintenance & Operations Equipment Maintenance Emergency & Routine Vehicle & Equip.Rental General Liability Contract Services Water Utilities Electric Utilities Subtotal: $243,360 $90,040 $24,000 $62,040 $6,000 $1,000 $12,420 $17,000 $96,650 $95.950 $648,460 Assessment Administration and General Overhead Tax Delinquency Debt Service Subtotal: $259,230 $92,760 $680.180 $1,032,170 Gross Revenue Required: $1,680,630 Less: 93/94 District Carryover <$510> Assessment Revenue Required: $1,680,120 METHOD OF SPREAD The Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 indicates that assessments may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes costs among all lots or parcels with the District in proportion to the estimated benefits received. A. Definitions The District is divided into three categories for the purpose of determining the assessments as follows: CATEGORY A - includes parcels based on the number of existing residential units within certain ranges of parcel size. CATEGORY B - includes all parcels not defined in Category A or Category C. CATEGORY C - includes exempt parcels. Exempt parcels were discovered by searching the County Assessor's computer tapes for those parcels that are listed as exempt by the Assessor or which have an assessed value of less than $500. In conducting the search, several parcels were included as exempt that show parcel sizes in excess of 1.5 acres and type codes of, for example, residential or agriculture. These parcels were added back into the rolls and assessed. B. Formula The assessment formula is based on actual land use information contained in the current San Bernardino Assessor's computer files and Assessor's parcel maps. 182 Category A: All parcels containing existing residential dwelling units and meeting the following conditions. Parcel Size Range Less than 1.5 acres and 1.51 to 3,5 acres and 3~51 to 7.0 acres and 7.01 to 14.0 acres and 14.01 to 25.0 acres and 25.01 acres & larger and Number of Existing Res. Dwelling Units/Parcel 1 or more dwelling units 2 or more dwelling units 4 or more dwelling units 8 or more dwelling units 15 or more dwelling units 26 or more dwelling units Category A is based on the number of existing residential units. The actual assessment for Bond Debt Service per existing residential dwelling unit may decrease each year as more residential units are built within the improvement district. Maintenance costs, however, are expected to increase annually and will somewhat offset the anticipated decrease in assessments due to new development. Category B: All parcel not defined in Category A or Category C. Category C: All exempt parcels as defined below: 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. All properties currently tax exempt; All public ownerships; Railroad mainline rights-of-way; Major utility transmission rights-of-way; Mineral rights; Parcels so small they currently cannot be built upon; All normally assessable parcels within an assessed valuation of less than $500 and 1.5 acres or less; and Summary of Preliminary Assessment Amounts Category A: The preliminary estimated assessment rate which will be levied during fiscal year 1994/95 is $52.00 per dwelling unit for those parcels in Category A. Category A parcels containing more than one residential dwelling unit will be assessed for an amount equal to $52.00 times the number of dwelling units. 183 Category B: The assessment which may be levied for parcels within Category B during fiscal year 1994/95 shall be according to the following schedule: Definition Assessment Per Parcel less than 1.50 acres 1.51 acres to 3.50 acres 3.51 acres to 7.0 acres 7.01 acres to 14.0 acres 14.01 acres to 25.0 acres 25.01 acres & larger $ 26.00 $ 78.00 $ 182.00 $ 364.00 $ 728.00 $1,300.00 Category C: The assessment shall be $0.00 for Category C parcels. PROJECTED 1994/95 ASSESSMENTS 23,139 Single Family Parcels 244 Multi-Family Parcels Less than 1.50 Acres (1171 Parcels ) 1.5 Acres to 3.50 Acres (421) Parcels) 3.51 Acres to 7.0 Acres (204) Parcels) 7.01 Acres to 14.0 Acres (126 Parcels) 14.01 Acres to 25.0 Acres (42 Parcels) 25.01 Acres or larger (21 Parcels) 30,369 units 23,139 units at 5,245 units at 1171 units at 421 units at 204 units at 126 units at 42units at 21 units at $52.00 $52.00 $ 26.00 $78.00 $182.00 $364.00 $728.00 $1,300.00 = $1,203,228 = $272,740 = $30,446 = $ 32,838 = $ 37,128 = $ 45,864 = $30,576 = $ 27.300 $1,680,120 184 ~ARK AND RECREATION I:'PROVIgMENT DISTRICT PD R~IX~lC~ ~Zll~ I)IJ'PARTIIKNT G.I~. IXYI3101( /T~OFRAJICHOCUCAM(MIGA g~g-1~51, KIT. ~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY CALIFORNIA DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: June 1, 1994 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Brad Buller, City Planner Nancy Fong, AICP, Senior Planner CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 78-03 - SAM'S PLACE - A request to revoke the Conditional Use Permit for the operation of a bar in conjunction with a restaurant in the Neighborhood Commercial District, located at the northwest corner of 19th and Carnelian Streets - APN: 201-811-56 through 60. ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT 91-02 - SAM'S PLACE - A request to revoke an Entertainment Permit for a bar and restaurant in the Neighborhood Commercial District, located at the northwest corner of 19th and Carnelian Streets - APN: 20~-811-56 through 60. Staff recommends that the City Council re-open the continued revocation hearing for the above-described permits. If after the public hearing it is determined that the applicant has not complied with all the conditions of approval, staff recommends approval of the attached resolutions revoking Conditional Use Permit 78-03 and Entertainment Permit 9~-02. The continued revocation hearing is recommended to be re-opened for further Council consideration for the above-described permits as a result of the applicant's failure to comply with the conditioD~ of approval within one week from the meeting on May 4, 1994- The May 4, ~994, revocation hearing was continued to September 21, 1994, with the condition that the applicant comply with all conditions of approval within one week from the May 4, 1994, date and that he close his business at midnight instead of 2 a.m. Based on the inspections of May ~2, ~8, and 24, ~994, staff observed that the applicant has complied with some but not all of the on-site physical improvements. At the writing of this report, the no parking signs along the wall of the west property boundary have not been installed and the chain gate along the north driveway has been found open in the evening hours- The chain gate was to be closed in the evenings to prohibit vehicles from parking adjacent to the residential homes to the east- An inspection at 9:45 p.m- on Tuesday, May 24, 1994, found the chain gate open and a van parked in the westerly parking lot. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CUP 78-03 & EP 91-02 - SAM'S PLACE June 1, 1994 Page 2 Field observation by the Police Department has found the doors to Sam's Place to be closed at midnight since the Council's May 4 hearing, however, a patron of Sam's did call .and share that drinks are still being served after midnight and that a D.J. was performing. Staff is attempting to verify this information. Staff has not observed illegal entertainment since the hearing on May 4, 1994. Respectfully submitted, BB:NF/jfs Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Letter to Applicant dated May ~7, 1994 Exhibit "B" - City Council Resolution Nos.' 94-004, 91-381, and 91-382 Exhibit "C" - Planning Comission Resolution No. 82-98 Resolution Revoking CUP 78-03 Resolution Revoking EP 91-02 187 D_,\ X(' ilk) May 17, 1994 Mr. Sam Pellegrino Sam's Place 6620 Carnelian Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 Dear Mr. Pellegrino: As you recall, the City Council continued the revocation hearing to September 21, 1994 with the condition that you comply with all conditions of approval in City Council Resolution Nos. 94-004, 91-382 and Planning Connnission Resolution No- 82-98 within one week from the date of May 4, 1994 and that you close your bar and restaurant business at midnight instead of 2 a.m., effective immediately. Immediately following the May 4, 1994 meeting, and up to May 12, staff had several conversations with you, your attorney, and several of your staff members offering our assistance should you need any of the conditions clarified before you did the work. It was suggested specifically by Mr. Bullet that you prepare a plan for his approval to ensure that the work required would be done correctelY. Mowever, you chose to proceed without getting any plans approved by the City. As you know, the specific conditions of approval that you have to comply with are: to post "No Parking" signs and to install physical barriers consisting of landscaping and a chain across the drive aisles to block access and parking in the northwest parking area. The attached Exhibit "A" shows explicitly how to comply with the conditions. You have received copies of these on several occasions (i.e., January 12, 1994 letter, March 23 and May 4, 1994 staff reports). Today I met with you at your business for the purpose of re-inspecting the site for compliance with the conditions of approval. My observations today, and that of my first inspection on May 12, 1994, indicated that you have only installed a chain barrier around the 13 parking spaces along the westerly property boundary. I informed you that this does not comply with the conditions of approval. Because of this non-compliance, staff has scheduled a new revocation hearing at the June 1, 1994 City Council meeting- You failed =o place the 24-inch box trees that were to be placed behind the existing concrete gutter across the drive aisle between the cleaners and the dental office. You also failed to install the "No parking" signs that were to be placed on the westerly property wall. lastly, you failed to install the lockable chain across the drive aisle, at the service driveway, from the trash enclosure wall to the northerly property wall. .Mr. Sam CUP 7S-03 and EP 91-02 May 17, 1994 Page 2 During my meeting with you en the site today, you informed me that you would place the tree Containers b~ tomorrow (May 18, 1994), and install the chain barriers, as well as post the "No Parking" signs, by the end of this week. However, you stated that you cannot be held responsible for someone removing the tree containers or the chain. I responded that it is your responsibility to ensure that the tree containers, as well as the chain, are maintained in place- I suggested that you could use larger containers, such as a 48-inch container with a 24-inch box size tree, which would deter anyone from removing them. With regard to your question on fire access, I have spoken with Mr. Ralph Crane, Deputy Fire Marshal, who stated that the locations of the tree containers and the chain are acceptable. If the chain is to be secured, that is locked, then a Fire District approved "knox padlock" shall be used. According to Mr. Crane, this "knox padlock" can be obtained at the Fire District at a cost of approximately $60 to $65. Please contact the Fire DisUrict at (909) 987-6405 to obtain this padlock. I strongly urge you to comply with the conditions of approval before the revocation hearing date of June l, 1994. I have scheduled a compliance inspection on May 24, 1994. If you have any questions regarding the conditions of approval, or need further clarification on complying with them, please do not hesitate to call me at (909) 989-186~. Sincerely, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Senior Planner NF:sp Attachments - Exhibit "A" - Site Plan cc: John Mannerino, Attorney Doug Hone and Doug Gotget, Property Owners Richard Alcorn, Code Enforement Supervisor Brad Bullet, City Planner U IIIIillllllllll~ :· , . · , I;141 ii' " ::: r' ~ , .... CARNELIAN AVIM~ .. . ........ RESOLUTIC~ N0.94-004 A. Recita] ~. (i) Luanne Pellegrino b~ filed an application for the issuance of Entertair~ent Permit No. 91-O2, as described in the title of this ~bsolUti~n. Hereinafter in t_h/s Resolution, the subjec~ ~Ycer~sirma~c Permit (ii) On ~ 10, 1993, the Plannir~ O .... {-~icn of the City of Rancho O~.,r.~3~ ccrchEted a duly noticed public hearir~ cn the a[~licaticn and omcl, w~ma ~d ~sarixN ~ that date. =he O~M{~icm ~a Reeolutic~ of DerLialatthemeetingcll~23, 1993. (iii) The decisic~ ~Bsented by saw Plannin; C~e~{~ical resoluticml was timely apFealed to this Council. (iv) On January 5, 1994, the City Council of the City of O~-~..-~ concocted a duly noticed public hearirr/cn the ~c~licaticn (v) All legal ~e4d~ites prior to the ackVcic~ of this Resolutic~ have 1. lhts Council hereb~ s~ecifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the ~%scitals, Part A, of this Resolutic~ are true ar~ ~3~LYm.~. mirutee of the Plannirr/O~m~icn ~, and the contents of Plannir~ O'-..-~-~icn P~soluticn No. 93-101, tb~-q Council hereby s~mcifically firds as a. The a[~licati~n a~c~lias to ~e~tf located at 6620 Carnelian 191 Resolution No. 94-004 Page2 b. The ~ to the north is vacant and planned for a funire freeway, the property to the south is a shopping center, the property to the east is a ~xtmpirr/cent~; and the properties to the west are single family residences; ar~ c. Ihe original Entertainment Permit wms granted for a duet and allowed entertainment on Monday through Saturday, between 8 p.m. to 2 a.m.; d. The applicant exparded the types of entertainment to include live bends, disc jockey with karaoke, and lircjerie shows and the days for errr~_v~aixm~nt to include Surday, in violaticm of Ordinance No. 290 arr] City Council Resolution No. 91-382; an~ e. After repeated contacts with City staff recjardir~ the violations, the applicant ccrfcinued the violations, whim ultimately led to the issuance of the City's Notice of Violation. Upon receivirr/the Notice of Violation, the applicant suknitt_ea an application requestir~ modification to the ~terta~ Permit to allow enterta~ on Sunday and to add live f. The City received o~~ fr~ adjacent residents c~jectin~ to the lc,xl ~usic fr~m the entertairment in the ~ ~ lc,xl n~ise ~ the loirerift/activities in the parkirr/lot in the late evenin~ and early mornir~ g. The ~x~ ~ with the ~on of karaoke will omtimm the land use conflict previously described with the westerly residential neig~rbocd because of the adverse impact of =~r~-~--eive noise ccmin~ fr~n Sam's Place in the late e~enir~ and early mornin~ hours; and h. The applicant has not ckara~L~at~a that he can be a good neig~or nor c~ply with the City's codes and ~_n~a_~tic~s of a~roval because the City has previously rmceived complaints from residents Of the s~me westerly nei~ c~jecti~ to the loud ~usic, noise, ar~ loiterin~ activities _r~ fr=m Sam's Place and because the a~plicant ccrfc/nued to violate the city, s ~~ and om~timm of ~ ur~sr the ~ermit durin~ the a~a-z~f~.d pjblic bMrin~ ar~ ~ the sp$cific fir~Js of facts set forth in Z3s~-=~c~.- 1 ar~ ~ at3:,a, this Council bezet~ fixes ar~ __n'~c_lucles as follc3e: a. That the ~ of the ~mhliSh~el'~ ~ the ~ of the a~plicaticn would ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~lic ~, ~, ~, ~ Paseiu~ion ~. 34-004 c. ~at that granting of the applicati~ would create a public d. ~hat the n~rm~ c~oerati~n of the prenises wuuld interfere with the ncrmal peace and quiet of any s~ura~rrj residential neighh~x~/. 4. Based u~m the fir~rr/s and ccrr:lusicre set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Council hereby denies the applicatio~ in part subject to the followin~ ccrrli~: a. All caxiitia~ of approval as arerained in City Council Reeol~ NO. 91-382 and pla ' ,gun:/Orere'i,.. im Reeolutim No. 82- 98, a cc~F of whi~ has been attac~ed hereto, shall apply. b. Karaoke without Disc Jockey is allowed. 5. ~ Council hereby provides notice to John Mannerino that the time within w~i~h judicial revie~ of the decisic~ rs;reeen~e~ by this Resolutio~ ~ be sarjht is governed by the provisicrs of CalifcEnia Cede of Civil [~oceaure Sectic~ 1094.6. 6. The City Clrek of the City of Rancho O~--..,,~j~ is hereby a4~ced to: (a) certify to the adcptic~ of this Resolution, and (b) fcrthwitb ~~t a certified cc~y of this Resolution, by certified mail, return- recei~c requested, to John Mann ino at the address identified in City 7. The City Clerk shall certify to the acttaticm of this Resolutic$~. PASSe>, ~, and ADO~ this 5th day of Ja/13ary, 1994 193 Resolution No. 94-004 Page4 I, D~RA J. ADAMS, CITY c?~RK of the City of Rancho Cucam~nga, California, do ~ by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamon~a, California, at a re,at meetir~ of said City Council held on the 5th day of January, 1994 Executed this 6th day of Ja~_ ~y, California. 1994 at Rancho Cucamonga, D-! .~a J. , City Clerk RESOLUFION NO. 91-381 A RESOLUI~ON OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANe~ OJCAMDNGA, CALIFORNIA, SUSTAINING THE APPEAL OF THE PLANNING CC~MISSION'S DECISION TO D~Y THE AM~IM~NT TO CDNDITIONAL USE PErmIT 78-03 FOR THE R~ TO ~ THE HOURS OF OPERATION AND AMenD THE CXDNDITION OF DISTR/CT AT 6620 CARN~.TAN STREET, NORTHWEST C0]~[~R OF SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 201-811-56 TrUeSt{ 60 A. Recitals. (i) John Mannerino, on behalf of Sam Pellegrino, has filed a petition to modify the Conditions of Approval for Co~iiticrel Use Permit 78-03 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in tbi-~ Resolution, the subject Conditi~lal Use Permit is referred to as the "application. ,, (ii) On July 10, 1991, and cc~t~ to July 24, AEr3ust 14, and September 11, 1991, the Planning Camissic~ of the City of Rancho ccr~kr~d a duly noticed public hearin~ on the applicatic~ and at the conclusion of said public hearing, ad~ Resolutic~ No. 91-131, thereby denyixN said application. (iii) The decisic~ ~e~reeentad by said Plannin~ O-.,,dssion Resolution was timely ~,~led to this Council. (iV) On October 16 and cc$1t~ to ~ 20, 1991, the City Council of the City of Rand~ O~.,r-~ curr]ucted a duly noticed public hearin~ on the applicatio~ and concluded said heerix~ on that date. (v) All lecJal ~rerequisiM prior to the edo~tic~ of this Resolutic~ have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho (l~m~rja does hereby find, determine, and resolve as follows: 1. ~ Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recita/s, Part "A, " of this Reeolutic~ are true and cokLe~%. minutas of the above-referenced PlannixN Cr~i-~ion meetir~, and the ccrt~3Es of Plannir~ C~-.dasion Resolution No. 91-131, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at the north- west corner of 19th and Carnelian Streets with a --t~T~t ~ of 1,037 feet and lot de4Xh of 240 feet and is presently improved with a shoppitt/center..- 195 Resolution No. 91-381 Page 2 (b) The prc~ to the north of the subject site is a future fr~ay; the prope~ to the south of that site is an existing shopping center; the property to the east is an existing shc~0ing center; and the property to the west is existing single family residences. (c) The proposed amendment contamplates extending the hours of operation to coincide with those established by the applicant's alcoholic beverage control license; that is, from the current closing hours of 11:00 o'clock P.M. to a new closing hour of 2:00 o'clock A.M., Monday throu~ Saturday; ara eliminating the conditions of aRcrovml prohibiting live entertainment. (d) The applicant filed the same application to extend the hours of operation on May 22, 1990, and the application wms denied on appeal by City Council on Jar~y 2, 1991, by adoption of their Resolution No. 91-007. (e) The Develo~mmnt Code, Section 17.04,030H, states that followirr/the denial or revocation of a Conditional Use Permit application, no application for a CoFrhtional Use Permit for the same or sukstantially the same use of the sa~e or substantially the same site shall be filed within one year free the date of denial or revocation. (f) The a~licant b~ been o~eratin~ the business beyond the 11:00 o'clock P.M. limitation and offering live enter=aix~mr~ in violation of the oorrlitiorm of'approvB1 and in violation of Ordinance No. 290pertaining to (g) The current limitation on hours of o~eration to 11:00 o'clock P.M. w~s established as a d~eCt result of a history of public safety arr~public nu~_~-c~proble~s ass~ciatedwiththis location. (h) The City has not received evidence that the former problemB have occttrred since the (Taler's origi/lal ~ in May of 1990. (i) There are mitigation nmasures available to prevent any problemB that may be cre~ed by the extension of hours of operation and providin~ live er~ar~%ix~e~. (a) That the ~~ use, Ux/ether with the c=~ditices imposed as mitigation measures, is in acucrd with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in whim the site is located. 196 Resolutlcn No. 9!-18! Page 3 (b) That the proposed use, tcgether with the conditions imposed as mitigation measure, will not be detrizental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to pr~ies or improvements in the vicinity. 4. Ihe City Council of the City of Rancho O~monga hereby approves the application with the foll~wirg conditions: 1) All pertinent conditions of approval as contained in Planning C~,,,,~ssion Resolution No. 82-98, a copy of which b~-~ been attached hereto, shall apply. 2) Ibis approval is granted for a restaurant with incidental serving of alcoholic beverages. A lurch an~ dinner menu shall be served to rainrain the primary restaurant use. 3) The hours of c~eration shall be between 11:00 o'clock A.M. until 2:00 o'clock A.M., Monday through Saturday. 4) The front door of the business shall retain closed during evening hours (6:00 o'clock P.M.), ex=e[~ in the event of 5) The ~ parkirg area shall not be used by patrons frcm Sam's Place and shall be a{4~ia~ly posted. 6) A minizum of two regularly employed security guards shall be required to be on the pr~i~ from 6 o'clock P.M. until two (2) hours after the cessation of the servin~ of alcohol and any live entertainment. At least me of the guards adjacent areas of the facility. 7) ~ of tbi-~ request shall r~c waive ccml~lian~ with all secti~-,s of the Develclzmnt COols and all other at~licable City C~li/mnc~s. s) If the c~eraticn of the facility c~,t~ adverse effects tenants, including but not limited to, noise, loitering, or disturbance, the Conditional Use Permit shall be brought before the Planning O-,,,,i-~sion for the consideration and possible tarm]=mtion of use. 5. This Council hereby provides notice to John Mannerino that the ti~e within which judicial review of the decision ~~ by this Resolution ~ast be sought is governed by the provisions of California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. Resolution No. 91-381 Page 4 6. The City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby directed to: (a) certify to the adoption of this Resolution, and (b) forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified mail, return- receipt requested_, to John Mannerino at the address identified in City records. 7. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSBD, ~, and ADOPTED this 4th day of December, 1991. Alexander, Buquet, Williams AYES: NOES: Stout, Wright ~: None Dennis L. Stout, Mayor I, Dm~A J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Pancho ~, California, do hereby certify that the fore~oin~ Resolution was duly aRaroved, and ad~ ~y the City Council of the City of Panclio Cucamon~a, California, at a re~ meetin~ of said City Omzncil held on the 4th day of Deosmb-~, 1991. Executed t.b{-~ 5th day of Dec,,m~-~r, 1991 at ~ Cucanxmc/a, California. 198 RESOLUI~0N NO. 91-382 A RESOLUF/ON OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ~, CALIFORNIA, SUSTA/NING THE APPEAL OF THE PLANNING CIMMISSION' S D~ISION TO DBa~Y PEP~MIT 91-02 FOR THE R~ TO ~ LIVE THE NEIGHBORHOOD (II~MERCIAL DISTRICT AT 6620 ~,TAN STREET, NORTHWEST C0RNE~ OF 19TH AND CARN~.TAN AND MAKING FINDIbr~ IN SUPPOR~ THERE)F - APN: 201-811-56 THROU~{ 60 A. Recitals. (i) John Mannerino, c~ behalf of Sam Pellegrino, has filed an application for ~tertainnmnt Permit 91-02 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Entertaimmnt Permit is referred to as the "application." (ii) On July 10, 1991, and ccrt~ to July 24, August 14, ar~ Segtenker 11, 1991, the Planning C~mnission of the City of Rancho O~.~n~ ~ a duly noticed public hearing on the a~lication and following the conclusion of said public hearings, ~ Resolution No. 91-132, thereby denyirg said application. ( iii ) The decision re~resented b~ said Planning Ccmnission Resolution was timely ~[T~]ed to this'CcRzlcil. (iv) On October 16, and continued to Noveher 20, 1991, the City Omancil of the City of Rancho C~r~monga ~ a duly noticed public hearirK/on the application and concluded said hearir~ c~ that date. (v) All legal prerequisites prior to the a~0ption of this Resolution B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho O~monga does hereby find, determine, ar~ resolve as follows: 1. 1his Council hereb~ specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part "A, " of this Resolution are true ard co~l~{. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Ommcil during the above-referenced public hearings including written s~f re~orts, the minutes of the ab:Ne-referenced Planning Cx~m~icn meetirg, and the contents of Planning C~,-.~ssion Resolution No. 91-132, this Council hereby specifically finds as follM: (a) The application applies to property located at the north- west corner of 19th and Carnelian Streets with a street frontage of 1,037 feet and lot 'depth of 240 feet ar~ is presently improved with a shoppir~ center. Resolution No. 91-382 Page 2 (b) The property to the north of the subject site is a future freeway; the property to the south of that site is an existing shc~oing center; the property to the east is an existing shopping center; and the prc~ to the west is existin~ single family residences. (c) The applicant has been operating the business beyond the 11:00 o'clock P.M. limitation ar~ offerir~ live enterta~ in violation of the corrlitions of approval as contained in Resolution Nos. 83-117 and 91-007 for Conditional Use Permit No. 78-03 and Ordinance No. 290 pertaining to (d) The City has received three written complaints objecting to the lateness of the heirs of operation and the live entertainment. (e) The curren~ limitation on hours of c~eration to 11:00 o'clock P.M. and the elire/nation of live entertairment were eS~hl~ as a direct result of a hist~mry of public safety and public ~,~ce problems associatea_ with this location. (f) ~he City has not received evidence that the former problemB have c~ct=Ted since the owners original request in May of 1990. (g) The applicant has sukmitted a petition of approximately 1,600 si~namEes in sup~rt of extendin~ the hours of o~eration and providin~ live enterta~ for Sam's Place. re~c~ ~s, this Council her~ finds and concludes as follows: (a) ~he ccrrhact of the eS~hl~ or the granting of the application w~uld not be cor~rary to the public health, safety, mora/s, or welfare; and (b) The pr~m~ or es~hlisbmer~ is not likely to be o~erated in an illec/al, ~L~x~ar, or d/sorderly manner; and (c) ~at gran~ the a~lication, tcuJetber with the corrlitio~s of approval, w~uld not cream a public ~; ar~ (d) ~hat the normal operation of the pr-m{-~= ~ not inter- fere with the Nmece ar~ ~tiet of the su~ourrlin~ residential neig~zrhood. 4. =he City Council of the City of Pancbo O~.,~,~ hereb~ approves the application with the foll~ir~ ccrrlitic~s: 1) All pertinent conditions of approval as contained in Plar~ O~ion Resolution No. 82-98, a cc~y of which% has been attached hereto, shall a~ly. The E~ar~mim~E Permit is granted for a duet only, ccesistir~ of an acoustical guitaris= and a sirrjer. 2OO esolu~lcn :;o. Page 3 3) Any live entertainment shall be provided between 8:00 o'clock P.M. and 2:00 o'clockA.M. Motday through Saturday. 4) The front and back doors of the business shall retain closed during evening hours (after 6:00 o'clock P.M.) except in the event of an emergenq. 5) The northwest parkir~ area shall not be used by patrons from Sam's Place and shall be appropriately posted. 6) A minimum of two rec3ularly employed seozrity ~ds shall be rec~m{red to be on the prem~ fx~- 6:00 o'clock P.M. until two hours after the cessation of the servir~ of alcohol arE] any live entertainment. At l~-~t one of the adjacent areas of the facility. 7) ARc'oval of this request shall not waive cc~01ianoe with all sections of the Develc~mmnt Code and all other applicable City Or~. If the operation of the facility causes adverse effects upon the surrcura~ residents, adjacent businesses and tenants, includi~ but not limited to, noise, loirerift/, or disturbances, the Conditicrml Use Permit shall be brcught before the Plann~ C~,-,./ssion for the consideration and possible termination of use. 5. This Council hereby provides notice to John Mannerino that the time within which judicial review of the decision re~zesent~a~ by this Resolution ~ be souc3ht is governed by the provisions of California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. 6. The CityClerk of theCity of Rancho O~mrrrja is hereby directed to: (a) certify to the adoption of tb~ Resolution, and (b) forthwith tranmnit a certified c~ of this Resolution, by certified mail, return- receipt requested, to John Mannerino at the address identified in City records. 7. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PAS~, APP~, ard ADOPTED this 4th day of Deck, 1991. Alexarrler, Bucluet, Williams AYES: NOES: Stout, Wright ~: No~e · L. Stout, Mayor 9 01 Resolution No. 91-382 Page 4 I, Dw~RA J. ADAMS, CITY cT.~{K of tba City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Caur~il held on the 4th day of Ekmf~mM~r, 1991. Exeojted this 5th day of December, 1991 at Rancho Oacamonga, California. D~f .. a J. Aa~ , City Clerk 202 RESOLUTION 82-98 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, MODIFYING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 78-03 FOR BAR AND ENTERTAINMENT FACILITIES WITHIN THE BOAR'S HEAD ESTABLISHMENT LOCATED IN THE RANCHO PLAZA IN THE C-1 ZONE WHEREAS, on the 22nd day of September, 1982, the Planning Commission determined the need to suspend Conditional Use Permit 78-03 and to conduct a public hearing; and, WHEREAS, on the 27th day of October, 1982, the Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the above item. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolves as follows: SECTION 1: Additional conditions and changes are found to be needed for Conditional Use Permit 78-03 in order to mitigate the past disturbances and bring the use in accord with the intent and purpose of the neighborhood shopping district. Therefore, the following conditions are added to those already in effect per Resolution 78-40: Periodic policing of the management of the business nightly basis to assist in from patrons. parking lot by the should be done on a averting disturbances Block access to the northwest parking area from the main parking area by placing large trees and planters in the driveway. Additionally, a chain or breakaway barrier shall be used to block access to this area from the rear driveway during evening hours. A sound attenuation wall shall be built on the three properties adjacent to the northwest parking area of the center. The precise height, location and construction materials shall be determind through the 1 eve deve opment of a precise d lopment plan, which shall be prepared by the shopping center owner and reviewed and approved by the City Planner. Such improvements shall consider the use of sound attenuation material as well as some additional landscaping between the new wall and the existing wall. The plans should be prepared as soon as possible and installatiion, with the cooperation of all property owners and before the January 26, 1982 meeting scheduled by the Conmnission. 5. Speed bun~os shall be placed throughout the center· Resolution No. 82-98 Page 2 An analysis of the building shall be conducted to determine the needs for sound insulation. Appropriate insulation shall be installed, if needed. The rear door of the business shall remain closed during evening hours, except in the event of an emergency. The northwest parking area shall not be used by Boar's Head patrons or employees and shall be appropriately posted. This Conditional Use Permit shall be brought before the Planning Conmnission on January 26, lg83, for a report on the performance of the establishment. 10. The business shall alter its operation to include restaurant usage and food service during the evening hours. This is required to meet the intent of the original approval and shall be accomplished within sixty (60} days of this action. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1982. PLANNING ~F~~~~/Y BY: ~ Jeff, CO MIlS N ATT OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Ce,..~ission I, JACK LAN, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of October, lg82, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: McNiel, King, Rempel NOES: COI~ISSIONERS: Barker, Stout ABSENT: CONNISSIONERS: None A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REVOKING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 78-03 FOR THE OPERATION OF A BAR IN CONJUNCTION WITH A RESTAURANT, SAM ' S PLACE, LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF 19TH AND CARNELIAN STREETS IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 201-811-56 THROUGH 60. A. Recitals- 1. On December 27, 1978, the Planning Con~nission adopted Resolution No. 78-40 conditionally approving a restaurant with a bar and entertainment at 6620 Carnelian Street, formerly known as the Boar's Head and presently Sam's Place. 2- On October 27, 1982, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 82-98 modifying the permit by adding conditions of approval to alleviate public nuisance problems as a result of consistent complaints from adjacent residents. Two conditions of approval required the applicant to install "No Parking" signs at the northwest parking area to prohibit employees and patrons from parking in that area and to place large trees and chain barriers across the drive aisles to block access into this parking area. The applicant failed to comply with these two conditions. 3. On September 28, 1983, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 83-117 modifying the permit to require the implementation of a dinner menu, additional noise attenuation measures, and the hours of operation to close at 11 p.m. 4. On July 10, 1985, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No- 83-117A modifying the permit by prohibiting entertainment uses- The conditions of approval in Planning Commission Resolution No. 82-98, as referenced in Section A.2, were to remain in effect. 5- On January 2, 1991, the Council adopted Resolution No- 91-007 denying the applicant's request to extend the hours of operation. The conditions of approval in Planning Commission Resolutions No. 78-40, 82-98, and 83-117A, as referenced in Sections A.1 through A.4, were to remain in effect. 6. On December 4, 1991, the Council adopted Resolution No. 91-381 to modify the permit by approving the extension of the hours of operation from 11 p.m. to 2 a.m., Monday through Saturday and eliminating the condition of approval prohibiting entertainment uses. The City Council also adopted Resolution No. 91-382 to approve the associated Entertainment Permit 91-02 to allow entertainment uses consisting of a duet. The conditions of approval in Planning Commission Resolution No. 82-98, as referenced in Section A.2, were to remain in effect. 205 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. CUP 78-03 - SAM'S PLACE June 1, 1994 Page 2 7. On January 12, 1994, the City of Rancho Cucamonga gave notice to Sam' s Place for immediate compliance with the conditions of approval as referenced above and attached hereto. 8. On January 24, and February 14, 1994, site inspections were conducted and the site was found to be in non-compliance with the conditions of approval. 9. On March 23, 1994, the Planning Comission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing for the revocation of the Conditional Use Permit for non-compliance of conditions of approval, and following the conclusion of said hearing, adopted Resolution No. 94-21, thereby revoking said permit. The decision represented by said Planning Commission Resolution was timely appealed to this Council. 10. On May 4, 1994, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing and continued it to September 21, 1994, with the condition that the applicant comply with all conditions of approval within one week from the May 5, 1994 date, and that the hours of operation cease at midnight effective immediately. ~1. On June 1, 1994, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga reopened the public hearing and concluded said hearing on that date. ~2- All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rencho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct- 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing on June ~, 1994, including written staff reports, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. This permit applies to property located at 6620 Carnelian Street and is presently improved with a shopping center; and b. The property to the north is vacant and planned for a future freeway, the properties to the south and east are existing shopping centers, and the property to the west is single family residences; and c. In response to complaints from adjacent residents, the applicant was sent a notice by letter, dated May 7, 1992, reminding him to comply with and adhere to all the conditions of approval as contained in City Council Resolutions No- 9~-381 and 91-382, and Planning Co-~ission Resolution No. 82-98. Conditions of approval included: posting ermanent "No Parking" signs at the northwest parking area; installing p~ysical barriers with CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. CUP 78-03 - SAM'S PLACE June 1, 1994 Page 3 landscaping and chains to block access into the northwest parking area closest to the adjacent residences; keeping the front and back door closed during business hours except for emergencies; providing security personnel outside to monitor the parking area; and assisting in averting public nuisance problems, etc.; and d. Site inspections on January 6, January 23, and February 14, 1994, indicated non-compliance with the conditions referenced in Section A.2. The applicant was given notices of non-compliance on these two inspection dates; and e. On March 4, 1994, the applicant was sent a notice of the permit violations and a notice of the scheduled March 23, 1994 revocation hearing; and f. Based on City Council action of May 4, 1994, inspections were conducted on May 12, May 18, and May 24, 1994, to check the site for compliance with all conditions of approval. The inspections indicated that the applicant has failed to post "No Parking" signs and put up the lockable chain across the drive aisle to prevent access and parking in the northwest parking area. g. On May 17, 1994, the applicant was given notice of the permit violations and the scheduling of the June 1, 1994 revocation hearing. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing and including written and oral staff reports, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The Conditional Use Permit is not being conducted in an appropriate manner and that modifications are not available to mitigate the impacts. Therefore, the permit should be revoked which requires the operation to cease and desist in the time allotted by the Council. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Council hereby denies the appeal and upholds the Planning Commission's decision in revoking Conditional Use Permit 78-03 and the use shall cease and desist within 10 calendar days from the date of the adoption of this Resolution. 5. This Council hereby provides notice to John Mannerino, attorney representing the applicant, that the time within which judicial review of the decision represented by this Resolution must be sought is governed by the provisions of California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. 6. The City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby directed to: (a) certify to the adoption of this Resolution, and (b) forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified mail, return-receipt requested, to John Mannerino at the address identified in City records- 7. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution- RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REVOKING ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT NO. 91-02 FOR A BAR AND RESTAURANT, SAM'S PLACE, LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF CARNELIAN AND 19TH STREETS IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 201-811-56 THROUGH 60. A. Recitals. 1. On December 4, 1991, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 91-382 approving Entertainment Permit 91-02, to allow entertainment uses consisting of a duet. 2. On March 8, 1994, the City of Rancho Cucamonga gave notice to the applicant that he violated the Entertainment Permit with the use of a disc jockey. 3. On March 23, 1994, the Planning Comission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing for the revocation of the Entertainment Permit, and following the conclusion of said hearing, adopted Resolution No. 94-22 thereby revoking said permit. The decision represented by said Planning Con~nission Resolution was timely appealed to this Council. 4. On May 4, 1994, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing and continued it to September 21, 1994, with condition that the applicant comply with all conditions of approval within one week from the May 4, 1994 date and that the hours of operation cease at midnight effective imediately. 5. On June 1, 1994, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga reopened the public hearing and concluded said hearing on that date. 6. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct- 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing on June 1, 1994, including written staff reports, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a- The application applies to property located at 6620 Carnelian Street and is presently improved with a shopping center; and b. The property to the north of the subject site is vacant and CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO- EP 91-02 - SAM'S PLACE June 1, 1994 Page 2 planned for a future freeway, the properties to the south and east are existing shopping centers, and the property to the west is single family residences; and c. In response to complaints from adjacent residents, the applicant was sent a notice by letter, dated May 7, 1992, reminding him to comply with, and adhere to, all the conditions of approval as contained in City Council Resolution No. 91-382; and d. Newspaper advertisements in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin indicated that entertainment such as live bands, disc jockeys with karaoke, and lingerie shows were offered at Sam's Place- On June 22, 1993, the applicant was notified to cease all illegal entertainment except for the approved duet- Despite repeated contacts, the violations continued as evidenced by the newspaper advertisement for entertainment (such as live bands and disc jockeys) dated August 25, 1993, and verified by site inspections on September 19, and 21, 1993; and e. In response to the City's citation process, the applicant submitted an application to modify the permit to legalize the added entertainment on September 23, 1993; and f. On January 5, 1994, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 94-004 denying Ithe applicant's request, except for karaoke. The approved entertainment consists of a duet and karaokes and g. Site inspections on January 24, and 26, 1994, and illegal signs retrieved in the City on March 10, 1994, indicated that the applicant continued to violate this permit with the use of disc jockeys; and h. On March 8, 1994, the applicant was sent a notice' of permit violations and a notice of the scheduled March 23, 1994 revocation hearings and i. Based on City Council action of May 4, 1994, inspections were conducted on May 12, May 18, and May 24, 1994, to check the site for compliance with all conditions of approval. The inspections indicated that the applicant has failed to post "No Parking" signs and put up the lockable chain across the drive aisle to prevent access and parking in the northwest parking area. j. On May 17, 1994, the applicant was given notice of the permit violations and the scheduling of the June l, 1994 revocation hearing. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing and including written and oral staff reports, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. EP 91-02 - SAM'S PLACE June 1, 1994 Page 3 a. The applicant violated provisions of the Chapter 5.12 RCMC and the permitted activity under Entertainment Permit 91-02; and b. The applicant violated the conditions of approval adopted by Council Resolutions No. 91-382 and 94-004. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Council hereby denies the appeal and upholds the Planning Commission's decision in revoking Entertainment Permit 9~-04 and the entertainment shall cease and desist within 10 calendar days from the date of the adoption of this Resolution- 5. This Council hereby provides notice to John Mannerino, attorney representing the applicant, that the time within which judicial review of the decision represented by this Resolution must be sought is governed by the provisions of California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. 6. The City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby directed to: (a) certify to the adoption of this Resolution, and (b) forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified mail, return- receipt requested, to John Mannerino at the address identified in City records. 7. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution- 210 DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: June 1, 1994 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Rick Gomez, Co~nunity Development Director Dan Coleman, Principal Planner ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 93-02A - GENERAL DYNAMICS - A proposed amendment to change the land use map from Industrial Park and General Industrial to Mixed Use and Open Space and other related amendments in conjunction with the Subarea 18 Specific Plan for 380 acres of land generally located north of 4th Street and west of Milliken Avenue - APN: 209-272- 01, 04, 07, and 08; 210-081-22 and 23; 210-082-02, 11, ~7, 37, 38 and 39; 210-361-0~ through 26. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 93-03 - GENERAL DYNAMICS - A proposed amendment to create a new Subarea 18, bounded on the south by 4th Street, on the east by Milliken Avenue, on the north by the A.T. & S- F. (Metrolink) Railroad, and on the west by Cleveland Avenue and Utica Avenue, and other related amendments to provide consistency with the Subarea 18 Specific Plan - APN: 209-272- 01, 04, 07, and 08; 210-081-22 and 23; 2~0-082-02, 11, 17, 37, 38 and 39; 210-361-01 through 26. The Planning Co~nission recommends that the City Council approve General Plan Amendment 93-02A and related Industrial Specific Plan Amendment 93-03. These amendments are part of a series of applications concerning the preparation of the Subarea ~8 Specific Plan for the redevelopment of 380 acres of land that would include recreational, commercial, and retail facilities surrounding an 18-hole public golf course. The proposed amendments to the General Plan and Industrial Specific Plan are necessary for consistency with the Subarea 18 Specific Plan. 211 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT GPA 93-02A & SP 93-03 - GENERAL DYNAMICS June 1, 1994 Page 2 ANALYSIS The current land use designations of General Industrial and Industrial Park are proposed to be changed to Open Space for the 174 acres of golf course and driving range. The Open Space designation would be consistent with the General Plan's designation for the Red Hill County Club golf course. Such a designation would recognize and preserve the open space character of the course, see Exhibits "D" and "E." In order to expand the variety of con~nercial and recreational uses contemplated within Subarea 18, and to encourage development which combines different, yet compatible uses, a new land use category entitled "Mixed Use" is proposed for the balance of the site, approximately 206 acres. The Mixed Use category would permit a wide range of comercial, office, and industrial activities, including medium, light, and custom manufacturing; research and development; office; recreation; and commercial. For a complete description and analysis, please refer to the attached copies of the Planning Comission staff report and minutes. RespeJfu31y , C~ooc~ G.o z , ' rector RG: DC: sp Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Project Vicinity Map Exhibit "B" - Surrounding Land Use and Zoning Exhibit "C" - Existing General Plan Land Use Designations Exhibit "D" - Proposed General Plan Land Use Designations Exhibit "E" - Existing Industrial Area Specific Plan Land Use Designations Exhibit "F" - Proposed Industrial Area Specific Plan Land Use Designations Exhibit "G" - April 27, 1994 Planning Comission Staff Report Exhibit "H" - April 27, 1994 Planning Commission Minutes Exhibit "I" - Planning Comission Resolution No. 94-30 Exhibit "J" - Planning Co~ission Resolution No. 94-31 Resolution Approving GPA 93-02A Ordinance Approving ISPA 93-03 LEGEND Pro~ Loozion I' - - ~ R.,,,ao c...,,o.g. ci,~ Not to Scale Michael Brmdma~ As~x~ata · 1/94 exhibit A Project Vicinit).' Map Rar~f~o Cucanx)nga IASP SuD-Area 18 Spec,hc Plan r -' 213 I =__~ k . ' ,,d=m,umm,~,,imth,m=~ ............. __aoo I,. ;;":-:;o-"0 '::i " · FOURTH STREET : .: : ... : { ' .....: 2'.: : · .: ..__ ,,~!lilt{ d%/*d i I 'T', ~.1 I · * ' ~ - k'2 ...."~'~ tat, , ., .,,, ,.~ .... ~'2~;.'..:~,=. :,,,.,-'.~, ,':~_~====?=;~;~==~:=;=:~:=;=:;~?=~.. ~" .;-~'... _/~'~ .y'./ ~~ -:'~'.'.-.'-'.'.".'.'-'.-' ~' ] ' ..... '. .~ r. m', w¢.~ ',, , ': ::::::::::::::::::::::::::: LEGEND Light !ndustml/Genenl I Michad Brandman Asaziates · !/94 ~9t)e-~of exhibit Existing Onsite and Surrounding Land Useg' RattCftO Cucamottga IASP Sutl-Area 18 Spec,t,c P~an ~., 2~ Cil,/ ~f Ontarl~ FOURTH STREE'i~' :':':':':'~" LEGEND Michatl Brandma~ A.~ociaz~ · 1/~ [ilii[~Huvy Indusmal I-' '-I s,b--~ ,s s~ General PlanUse Designations ,,.,~ ~ ,.s,. s,..--,,,.. ,. s,,.:,~ ~15 I I "!~' ..............""4 th Street 'c,~ o, o.,.,o,..,.~, LEGEND I,mmml H~.,.-~IIc~s~ Michael BrMc~ A,tmaata · 1/94 General Plan Land Use Amendmen~ P4ncrm Cucamonga LASP Sub-A~ea ~ e S{:~c ,~c 216 $ $ $ $ 4~ LEGEND / Industrial Area Specific ;}lan Land Use Designation FOOTHILL BLVD.* ARROW HM/Y. $ , I I$ · ,q · 1-10 I I S ,-, S ,~* S S S $ S $ $ $ $ S LEGEND I ..... -~ P~o,.-. si,..,,u..,.. I'_. :- ;. :1 I.d....., J i Haven Overby District ~ Minimum Impac~ Michael Braidman Assoctates· t/94 tg0g-0OOf t t H~v7 Indusrtai R~ncho Cucamonp-Sub-,~'ea SFcc~c o' 1000' 2000' ~ Sub-Atu Boun&nes ~ __, f,.,oe,,,,d ..-.. P Indust:rial Area Specific Plan Land Use Amendmet:, Ranclio Cucamonga IASP Sui)-Area ~8 5,OK,k< --'".at - 2Z8 DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT April 27, 1994 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Rick Gomez, Community Development Director Dan Coleman, Principal Planner ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 93-02A - GENERAL DYNAMICS - A proposed amendment to change the land use map from Industrial Park and General Industrial to Mixed Use and Open Space and other related amendments in conjunction with the Subarea 18 Specific Plan for 380 acres of land generally located north of 4th Street and west of Milliken Avenue - APN: 209-272-01, 04, 07, and 08; 210-081-22 and 23; 210-082-02, 11, 17, 37, 38, and 39; 210-361-01 through 26. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 93-03 - GENERAL DYNAMICS A proposed amendment to create a new Subarea 18, bounded on the south by 4th Street, on the east by Milliken Avenue, on the north by the A. T. & S. F (Metrolink) Railroad, and on the west by Cleveland Avenue and Utica Avenue, and other related amendments to provide consistency with the Subarea 18 Specific Plan - APN: 209-272-01, 04, 07, and 08; 210-081-22 and 23; 210-082-02, 11, 17, 37, 38, and 39; 210-361-01 through 26. SUMMARY: These amendments are part of a series of applications concerning the preparation of the Subarea 18 Specific Plan for the redevelopment of 380 acres of land that would include recreational, connercial, and retail facilities surrounding an 18-hole public golf course. The proposed amendments to the General Plan and Industrial Specific Plan are necessary for consistency with the Subarea 18 Specific Plan. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: Project: The Subarea ~8 Specific Plan proposes a multi-use development composed of 1] interrelated Planning Areas organized around a central golf course amenity. Distinguishing elements of the concept plan include an 18-hold championship golf course with clubhouse and related training facilities, a hotel/conference center, possible family-oriented recreation/retail/entertainment facility, a mixed-use co~nercial center, and a Metrolink Station. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 93-02A & ISPA 93-03 - GENERAL DYNAMICS April 27, 1994 Page 2 B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning (Exhibit "B"): North - Industrial; Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial (Subarea 9) South - Vacant; Ontario Center Specific Plan East - Industrial and Office; General Industrial (Subarea 10, 11) and Industrial Park (Subarea 12) West - Industrial and Office; General Industrial (Subarea 10, 11) and Industrial Park (Subarea 6) C. General Plan Designations (Exhibit "C") : Project Site - General Industrial and Industrial Pa~k North - Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial South - Ontario Center Specific Plan (City of Ontario) East - General Industrial and Industrial Park West - General Industrial and Industrial Park Site Characteristics: The project site currently includes 300 acres of vineyards, 5 acres of unpaved city road right-of-way that is proposed to be vacated, and three existing buildings on 75 acres. The site is bounded on the south by 4th Street, on the east by Milliken Avenue, on the north by the existing A. T. & S- F. Railroad, and on the west by Cleveland Avenue and Utica Avenue (see Exhibit "A"). The southerly project boundary is also the northerly boundary of the City of Ontario- ANALYSIS: The current General Industrial and Industrial Park land use designations were intended to permit a wide range of activities that include manufacturing, warehouse distribution, and office uses. In addition, the Industrial Area Specific Plan land use activities currently permitted include office, business support, convenience retail, entertainment and recreation. This broad mix of land uses was intentional to provide a transition from heavier intensity uses (i.e., heavy industrial) to less intense uses (i-e., office, retail) and ensure compatibility with the approved co~mnercial uses south of the site in the City of Ontario. Land Use Changes: The current land use designations of General Industrial and Industrial Park are proposed to be changed to Open Space for the 174 acres of golf course and driving range. The Open Space designation would be consistent with the General Plan's designation for the Red Hill Country Club golf course. Such a designation would recognize and preserve the open space character of the course, see Exhibits "D" and "E." In order to expand the variety of comercial and recreational uses contemplated within Subarea 18, and to encourage development which combines different, yet compatible uses, a new land use category entitled "Mixed Use" is proposed for the balance of the site, approximately 206 acres. The Mixed Use category would permit a wide range of con~nercial, office, and industrial activities, including medium, light, and custom manufacturing; research and development; office; recreation; and con~nercial. When built next to high activity nodes along major 220 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 93-02A & ISPA 93-03 - GENERAL DYNAMICS April 27, 1994 Page 3 transportation corridors, such as Milliken Avenue, mixed use development furthers General Plan goals to facilitate public transit or other alternative transportation modes. Be Circulation Change: The project proposes vacation of Cleveland Avenue between 4th Street and 6th Street to accommodate the large open space needed for the golf course. Cleveland Avenue exists as an 88-foot secondary arterial to serve local area traffic between 4th Street and 7th Street. The reduced traffic levels resulting from the golf course eliminates the need for Cleveland Avenue south of 6th Street. Miscellaneous Changes: A number of changes to the General Plan and Industrial Area Specific Plan text and maps are needed for consistency with the Subarea 18 Specific Plan. These changes are minor in nature and are not considered significant. A full description of these changes can be found in the attached Resolutions. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project. See related item on agenda for complete staff report. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property has been posted, and notices were sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the project site. RECO~ENDATION.: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recon=nend approval of General Plan Amendment 93-02A and Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 93-03 through adoption of the attached resolutions. Rick Comunit velopment Director ~G:DC:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Project Vicinity Map Exhibit "B" - Surrounding Land Use and Zoning Exhibit "C" - Existing General Plan Land Use Designations Exhibit "D" - Proposed General Plan Land Use Designations Exhibit "E" - Existing Industrial Area Specific Plan Land Use Designations Exhibit "F" - Proposed Industrial Area Specific Plan Land Use Designations Resolution for General Plan Amendment 93-02A Resolution for Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 93-03 221 Ae # DESIGN REVIEW FOR TRACT 13703 - SHEFFIELD HOMES - The design ray{-. of the detailed site plan and building elevations for a previoumm~ Lecorded tract consisting of 55 lots on 11 acres of land in t~- .~w Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre). '~ened on the west side of Haven Avenue, north of Banyan ~-_.u, across from Cheffay College - APN: 201-563-38 throu-~ .~. Motion: u-.,u-by McN{~l ..... ~s~ ~z /L~lo~=, .... l_a i ~ ~ adopt the Cee~ ~alendar, PUBLIC HEARINGS Be Ce Ee CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT - GENERAL DYNAMICS - A public hearing on a final EIR for the General Dynamics Rancho Cucamonga Subarea Specific Plan 93-01, General Plan Amendment 93-02A, Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 93-03, and Tentative Parcel Map 14847 for the redevelopment of 380 acres of land that would include recreational, commercial, and retail facilities surrounding an 18-hole golf course, bounded on the south by 4th Street, on the east by Millikan Avenue, on the north by the A. T. & S. F. (Metrolink) Railroad, and on the west by Cleveland Avenue and Utica Avenue - APN: 209-272-01, 04, 07, and 08; 210-081-22 and 23; 210-082-02, 11, 17, 37, 38, and 39; and 210-361-01 through 26. SPECIFIC PLAN 93-01 - GENERAL DYNAMICS - A plan for the redevelopment of 380 acres of land that would include recreational, con~nercial, and retail facilities surrounding an 18-hole golf course, bounded on the south by 4th Street, on the east by Millikan Avenue, on the north by the A. T. & S. F. (Metrolink) Railroad, and on the west by Cleveland Avenue and Utica Avenue - APN: 209-272-01, 04, 07, and 08; 210-081-22 and 23; 210-082-02, 11, 17, 37, 38, and 39; and 210-361-01 through 26. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 93-02A - GENERAL DYNAMICS A proposed amendment to change the land use map from Industrial Park and General Industrial to Mixed Use and Open Space and other related amendments in conjunction with the Subarea 18 Specific Plan for 380 acres of land generally located north of 4th Street and west of Millikan Avenue - APN: 209-272-01, 04, 07, and 08; 210-081-22 and 23; 210-082-02, 11, 17, 37, 38, and 39; and 210-361-01 through 26. ENVIRON~wNT~v- ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 93-03 - GENER~T- DYNAMICS - A proposed amendment to create a new Subarea 18, bounded on the south by 4th Street, on the east by Millikan Avenue, on the north by the A. T. & S. F. (Metrolink) Railroad, and on the west by Cleveland Avenue and U~ica Avenue, and other related amendments to provide consistency with the Subarea 18 Specific Plan - APNz 209-272-01, 04, 07, and 08; 210-081-22 and 23; 210-082-02, 11, 17, 37, 38, and 39; and 210-361-01 through 26. Planning Commission Minutes -2- April 27, 1994 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; VACATION OF CLEVELAND AVENUE BETWEEN 4TH AND 6TH STREETS, THOMAS STREET, VINCENT AVENUE, AND 7TH STREET EAST OF CLEVELAND AVENUE; AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 14647 - GENERAL DYNAMICS - A subdivision of 380 acres of land into 15 parcels in the General Industrial designation (Subareas 10 and 11} and the Industrial Park designation (Subarea 12} of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, bounded on the south by 4th Street, on the east by Millikan Avenue, on the north by the A. T. & S. F. (Metrolink) Railroad, and on the west by Cleveland Avenue and Utica Avenue - APN: 209-272-01, 04, 07, and 08; 210-081-22 and 23; 210-082-02, 11, 17, 37, 38, and 39; and 210-361-01 through 26. Dan Coleman, Principal Planner, presented the staff report and suggested two clarifications to the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) resolution indicating that full frontage and intersection improvements would be required. Betty Miller, Associate Engineer, indicated the applicant had requested several minor wording clarification revisions to the resolution for the Parcel Map and she said staff was comfortable with the revised language. Commissioner McNiel questioned the location and design of the retention basin. Ms. Miller indicated the retention basin will be located at the south end of the golf course just north of 4th Street. She said it will be incorporated into the landscaping of the golf course. Commissioner Tolstoy asked if there would be any spillways. Ms. Miller replied there may be spillway needs within the detention basin prior to connection to the the 4th Street storm drain when it is constructed. Commissioner Melcher asked for an update on the timing of master plans and design guidelines. Mr. Coleman responded that the resolution of approval for the Specific Plan includes a condition requiring that design guidelines be submitted prior to the application for development of any planning area except the golf course. Commissioner Melcher asked if the design guidelines would include landscaping. Mr. Coleman replied that landscaping is separately addressed in the Specific Plan. Commissioner Melcher thought the principal street landscaping would be part of th~ overall design continuity that would be expected of design guidelines. Mr. Colmman said he felt the Commission had requested the design guidelines because there was a feeling that certain items were not fully addressed in the Specific Plan. He said there was extensive discussion in the plan regarding landscaping, such as the type of plant materials to be used, and how and where they should be used. planning Commission Minutes -3- April 27, 1994 Brad Bullet, City Planner, mentioned that the landscaping is consistent with the master plans for the arterial streets. Commissioner Melcher stated it was his understanding that if a master plan is approved by the Commission, development review would be at the staff level; but if a project proceeds without a master plan, then development review would be at the Commission level. Mr. Coleman responded that was correct. Commissioner Halchar commented that the applicant would not necessarily be the developmr of the parcels. He expressed his concern that as time passes and City staff changes, the Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) might slip through the cracks. He questioned if the MMP should be recorded with the Parcel Map to be sure that future buyers become aware of the constraints it provides. Ralph Hanson, Deputy City Attorney, stated that almost anything can be recorded and there could be a disclosure statement, but he noted that monitoring responsibilities lie with staff rather than the developer. Mr. Buller stated that the mitigations called out are similar to any project in the City and a checkoff system is in place. Commissioner Melcher noted that the project applicant is listed as the implementor in many cases. Mr. Coleman responded that the applicant is responsible for preparing more detailed analysis in certain areas and staff must make sure that certain things are accomplished. He noted that a Development Agreement is being prepared and will be recorded against the property. He stated the agreement refers to the EIR and the MMP, so future owners would be aware of their existence and requirements. Commissioner Melcher asked what CEQA procedures would be used for future projects. Mr. Coleman replied that staff would review information submitted with each application to determine if all environmental concerns were addressed in the EIR. He said that additional environmental review would be required if all potential impacts had not been considered. Chairman Barker asked if staff could develop an ongoing history auditing trail so that each new applicant could see what had been conditioned and would not have to re-invent the wheel. Mr. Coleman said a paper trail will be created with the MMP because a report is required for each mitigation to indicate how it is accomplished and what documents fulfill each requirement. Chairman Barker asked if the information would be available to a potential buyer before they purchase a parcel. Planning Commission Minutes -4- April 27, 1994 Mr. Coleman replied it will all be public record and would be available. He said staff would ·leo advise any potential purchasers to read the information before consummation of the deal. Chairman Barker noted that Commissioner Melcher had st·ted that there should be some way to alert potential buyers because not everyone approaches the City prior to purchase. Mr. Coleman felt the recordation of the Development Agreement would suffice. Commissioner Melcher remarked he was satisfied so long as Mr. Coleman felt the Development Agreement would raise a flag to buyers. Commissioner Lumpp asked why the Director of Community Development is listed as the responsible monitoring party for some items in the MMP. Mr. Coleman responded that some of the mitigations may be tied to grading, building, or other permits which require approval of more than one division and the Community Development Director is responsible for coordinating all three divisions. Commissioner Lumpp felt the conditions of approval and the MMP should be attached to the Development Agreement. Mr. Coleman replied that the Development Agreement references the resolutions approving the Specific Plan, the EIR, etc., which contain the conditions. He noted that the Development Agreement is for the entire 380 acres with almost a dozen planning areas which may each have subdivisions with multiple developers and will each have their own sets of conditions of approval. Commissioner Melcher felt the review of the MMP will have heavy financial impacts on staff time over a period of time. He asked if the fee system provides for that requirement. Mr. Coleman responded affirmatively. fees will cover the costs. He said the plan check fees and permit Commissioner Melcher observed the draft EXR suggested the reduction of stationary emissions of operation-related activities through · variety of means, and when the applicant had taken exception to the requirement to incorporate appropriate passive solar design and solar he·tars, the EIR consultant had deleted the requirement. He asked if that requirement does not already appear in the Development Code. Mr. Coleman replied that the requirement is not in the Development Code. He noted the last under the air quality section is a generic list from the Air Quality Management District and is not intended to be all-inclusive nor is it intended that every suggestion would necessarily be feasible or appropriate. Me said it is up to the City's review process to be sure that appropriate measures are applied. Chairman Barker opened the public he·ring. Plannilng Commission Minutes -5- April 27, 1994 Jeff Kudlac, Kudlac Associates, 10900 East 4th Street, #601, Rancho Cucamonga, thanked staff, in particular Dan Coleman and Brad Buller, for their input and assistance. He thought the plan will be able to respond to changes in the industrial area. He said the latest draft of the Development Agreement has the Mitigation Monitoring Plan as an exhibit. He stated he and his management team were available to answer questions. Commissioner McNiel asked if the retention basin will alter the golf course, and if so, to what degree. Mr. Kudlac showed an exhibit of the golf course. He commented that the only drainage on the course will be from two of the planning areas and the course itself. He noted that natural drainage will bring water to the southern end of the golf course. He said 3 to 4 acres will be used as an interim facility in the event of a lO0-year storm. He said that once the 4th Street drain is connected into the Ontario facility, there will be no need for the detention basin. Commissioner McNiel asked how the area will be treated. Mr. Kudlac replied that their latest concept is a system of pearl lakes to dissipate and slow down flows. He stated they will be creating slopms to move drainage through the site. He said it will be a natural wash, perhaps cobbles, or a riparian wash. Commissioner Tolstoy asked if there was any chance that water from Millikan would enter the course. Mr. Kudlac replied the hydrolog~ study showed that would not happen. Hearing no further testimony, Chairman Barker closed the public hearing. Commissioner McNiel felt things are in order. He was pleased with the project. Commissioner Tolstoy felt staff did an excellent Job. Commissioner Melcher observed the project marks a landmark point in the City's development with the C~lssion's agreeing to relinquish the highly detailed level of project management they have exerted since the formation of the City and trusting in the abilities of the development team and consultants to give a unique and outstanding environment. He said he was pleased to see it happen. Commissioner Lumpp supported the project. Chairman Barker agreed the project is a landmark point and he felt it to be somewhat frightening, as the Commission has traditionally been heavily involved in project review. He felt it should work. He stated the Commission would be looking at the industrial area as a whole because changes have taken place since the plan was first developed and this project will make an even greater impact. He said he was pleased, hopeful, and tenuous. Planning Commission Minutes -6- April 27, 1994 Commissioner Tolstoy expressed concern there may not be an adequate level of planning staff for review. Chairman Barker felt the Commission could only express the concern and monitor the process. Motion: Moved by Tolstoy, seconded by McNiel, to adopt the resolution recommending approval of the Environmental Impact Report with modifications recommended by staff to clarify necessary improvements. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: BARKER, LUMPP, MCNIEL, MELCHER, TOLSTOY NONE NONE -carried Motion: Moved by McNiel, seconded by Lumpp, to adopt the resolution recommending approval of Specific Plan 93-01. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: BARKER, LUMPP, MCNIEL, MELCHER, TOLSTOY NONE NONE -carried Motion: Moved by Lumpp, seconded by McNiel, to adopt the resolution recommending approval of General Plan Amendment 93-02A. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: BARKER, LUMPP, MCNIEL, MILCNER, TOLSTOY NONE NONE -carried Motion: Moved by McNiel, seconded recommending approval of Industrial Motion carried by the following vote: by Lumpp, to adopt the resolution Area Specific Plan Amendment 93-03. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: BARKER, LUMPP, MCNIEL, MELCNER, TOLSTOY NONE NONE -carried Motion: Moved by Tolstoy, seconded by McNiel, to adopt the resolution approving Tentative Parcel Map 14647 with the wording clarification modifications indicated by staff. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: BARKER, LUMPP, MCNIEL, RELCHER, TOLSTOY NONE NONE -carried The Planning Commission recessed from 7:50 p.m. to 8:02 p.m. · · · · · Planning Commission Minutes -7- April 27, 1994 RESOLUTION NO. 94-20 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 93-02A, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN TO ADD A NEW LAND USE CATEGORY OF "MIXED USE," TO AMEND THE LAND USE MAP FROM INDUSTRIAL PARK AND GENERAL INDUSTRIAL TO MIXED USE AND OPEN SPACE, AND OTHER RELATED AMENDMENTS IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE SUBAREA 18 SPECIFIC PLAN FOR 380 ACRES OF LAND BOUNDED ON THE SOUTH BY 4TH STREET, ON THE EAST BY MILLIKEN AVENUE, ON THE NORTH BY THE A. T. & S. F. (METROLINK) RAILROAD, AND ON THE WEST BY CLEVELAND AVENUE AND UTICA AVENUE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 209-272-01, 04, 07, 08; 210-081-22, 23; 210-082-02, 11, 17, 37, through 39; and 210-361-01 through 26. A. Recitals. 1. General Dynamics has filed an application for General Plan Amendment No. 93-02A as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On February 23, and March 23, 1994, The Planning Comission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted workshops on the application. 3. On April 27, 1994, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted and concluded a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as followsz 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Con~ission during the above-referenced public hearing on April 27, 1994, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to approximately 380 acres of land, located west of Milliken Avenue, between 4th Street and the A. T. & S. F. Railroad and is presently vacant, except for 75 acres developed with three industrial office buildings. Said property is currently under contiguous PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. GPA 93-02-A - GENERAL DYNAMICS April 27, 1994 Page 2 b. The property to the north of the subject site is designated Heavy Industrial and is developed. The property to the west is designated General Industrial and Industrial Park and is primarily developed. The property to the east is designated General Industrial and Industrial Park and is primarily developed. The property to the south is designated the Ontario Center Specific Plan and is vacant; c. The application is part of a series of applications relating to a Subarea 18 Specific Plan, which contemplates a broad range of uses, such as recreational, hotel/conference center, retail, restaurant, and entertainment, as well as office, research and development, and light industrial uses surrounding an 18-hole public golf course; d. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan or the other elements of the General Plan and will provide for development , within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; e. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element and all other elements of the General Plan; and f. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and an Environmental Impact Report has been prepared and, concurrently with this application by separate Resolution, is recommended to the City Council for certification. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and b. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan and will not result in any internal inconsistencies with the General Plan. The detailed findings of conformity set forth in Exhibit hereto are hereby incorporated by reference. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of General Plan Amendment No. 93-02A to amend the land use map from General Industrial and Industrial Park to Mixed Use and Open Space for 380 acres of land at the northwest corner of Milliken Avenue and 4th Street (see Exhibit "A") and amending the text of the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan, as follows: a. The following new major land use category shall be added, preceding Public Facilities, on page III-16, to read as follows: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. GPA 93-02-A - GENERAL DYNAMICS April 27, 1994 Page 3 Mixed Use: The opportunity exists to mix different, but compatible, land uses and activities within mixed use developments. Mixed use developments are ideally suited for land within the downtown or adjacent to high activity nodes along major transportation corridors. The concept capitalizes on the ability of a mixed-use project to provide an integrated environment, to respond to evolving market conditions, to offer a variety of physical development types, and to create strong pedestrian orientation. Mixed use projects typically incorporate a mix of office, commercial, light industrial, and research oriented activities, and residential uses all clustered together into unified, highly identifiable developments. Entertainment, recreational, cultural, and convention uses may also be part of the mix. These projects bring an "urban scale" and are intended to become focal points within the community. Uses may be stacked within a single multi-use building or individually arranged together on a parcel. When built adjacent to, or in conjunction with, public transit facilities, a built-in ridership base is established." b. The following third paragraph shall be added to the Open Space subsection, page III-16, to read as follows: "Man-made open spaces, such as parks, golf courses, and common open spaces within residential housing projects, also help maintain an open character within the City. In particular, large open spaces, such as Meritage Park, Red Hill Park, the future Central Park, the future Subarea 18 golf course and the Red Hill Country Club golf course, provide significant vistas, and provide animal habitat, vegetation, and water resources in areas that would otherwise be developed without such features." c. The third paragraph under Location of Open Space, page IV-19, shall read as follows: "The Foothill and Industrial Area Specific Plans, in their designs and use limitations, will encourage openness and quality within development projects, and also continue linkages of open space throughout the community. A large public golf course is planned to stretch from 4th Street to the A. T. & S. F. Railroad, west of Milliken Avenue, as the central open space amenity of the Subarea 18 Specific Plan." 230 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. GPA 93-02-A - GENERAL DYNAMICS April 27, 1994 Page 4 d. The Figure III-1 Land Use Plan and the Table III-2 Land Use Summary shall be revised to reflect the land use changes within the Subarea 18 Specific Plan (see Exhibit "A"). e. 'The Figure III-3 Circulation Plan shall be revised to delete Cleveland Avenue (see Exhibit "B"). f. The Figure III-4 Transit Concept Plan shall be revised to indicate a rail commuter line along the A. T. & S. F. Railroad and a rail commuter transfer station on the west side of Milliken Avenue at the A. T. & S. F. Railroad (see Exhibit "C"). g. The Figure III-10 Community Design Resources shall be revised to indicate the approximately 150-acre golf course contemplated within the Subarea 18 Specific Plan, between 4th Street and the A. T. & S. F. Railroad, west of Milliken Avenue, as a "Major Parks and Recreation" feature (see Exhibit "D"). h. The Figure IV-4 Open Space Plan shall be revised to indicate the approximately 150-acre golf course contemplated with the Subarea 18 Specific Plan, between 4th Street and the A. T. & S. F. Railroad, west of Milliken Avenue, as a "Proposed Park" (see Exhibit "E"). 5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPR VED ~'IB ADOPTED THIS 7TH DAY OF APRIL 1994. PLANNI IS~ION OF~THE CIT~CHO CUCAMONGA E. Day= rker, A : ~ I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of April 1994, by ~he following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARKER, LUMPP, MCNIEL, MELCHER, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE 231 RESOLUTION NO. 94-31 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 93-03, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN TO ESTABLISH A SUBAREA 18, AND OTHER RELATED AMENDMENTS, IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE SUBAREA 18 SPECIFIC PLAN, FOR 380 ACRES OF LAND BOUNDED ON THE SOUTH BY 4TH STREET, ON THE EAST BY MILLIKEN AVENUE, ON THE NORTH BY THE A. T. & S. F. (METROLINK) RAILROAD, AND ON THE WEST BY CLEVELAND AND UTICA AVENUES, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 209-272-01, 04, 07, AND 08; 210-081-22 AND 23; 210-082-02, 11, 17, 37, 38, AND 39; AND 210-361-01 THROUGH 26. A. Recitals. 1. General Dynamics has filed an application for Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment No. 93-03 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On February 23, and March 23, 1994, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted workshops on the application. 3. On April 27, 1994, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted and concluded a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on April 27, 1994, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to approximately 380 acres of land, located west of Milliken Avenue, between 4th Street and the A. T. & S. F. rail line and is presently vacant, except for 75 acres developed with three industrial office buildings. Said property is currently under contiguous ownership and is designated as General Industrial (Subareas 10 and 11) and Industrial Park (Subarea 12); PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. ISPA 93-03 - GENERALLY DYNAMICS April 27, 1994 Page 2 b. The property to the north of the subject site is designated Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial (Subarea 9) and is developed. The property to the west is designated General Industrial (Subareas 10 and 11) and Industrial Park (Subarea 6) and is primarily developed. The property to the east is designated General Industrial (Subareas 10 and 11) and Industrial Park (Subarea 12) and is primarily developed. The property to the south is designated the Ontario Center Specific Plan and is vacant; c. The application is part of a series of applications relating to a Subarea 18 Specific Plan, which contemplates a broad range of uses, such as recreational, hotel/conference center, retail, restaurant, and entertainment, as well as office, research and development, and light industrial uses surrounding an 18-hole public golf course; d. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the Industrial Area Specific Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the Industrial Area Specific Plan and with related development; e. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the General Plan; and f. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and an Environmental Impact Report has been prepared and, concurrently with this application by separate Resolution, is recommended .to the City Council for certification. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and b. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. c. That the amendments to the Industrial Area Specific Plan are consistent with the objectives of the City's Development Code, Ordinance No. 211, adopted December 7, 1983. d. That the Subarea 18 Specific Plan submitted in conjunction with the proposed amendment provides for: (1) The development community within the District that allowable under alternate regulations; of a comprehensively planned urban is superior to development otherwise PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. ISPA 93-03 - GENERALLY DYNAMICS April 27, 1994 Page 3 (2) Development within the District in a manner consistent with the General Plan and related development and growth management policies of the City. (3) The construction, improvement, or extension of transportation facilities, public facilities, and public services required by development within the District. e. The proposed amendment will not adversely affect the public health, safety, or welfare; f. The actions taken and proposed to be taken by the City with respect to the proposed amendment and the corresponding change of zone have been and will be completed and reviewed in accordance with, and comply with, all applica61e State and local laws and regulations. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 93-03 to establish a Subarea 18 for 380 acres of land at the northwest corner of Milliken Avenue and 4th Street (see Exhibit "A"), and amending the text of the Industrial Area Specific Plan per the attached Exhibit "B." 5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF APRIL 1994. E. Da k r ATTEST: ra ar I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Co~Mniseion held on the 27th day of April 1994, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARKER, LUMPP, MCNIEL, MELCHER, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE RESOLUTION NO. ~-//~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 93-02A, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN TO ADD A HEW LAND USE'CATEGORY OF "MIXED USE," TO AMEND THE LAND USE MAP FROM INDUSTRIAL PARK AND GENERAL INDUSTRIAL TO MIXED USE AND OPEN SPACE, AND OTHER RELATED AMENDMENTS IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE SUBAREA 18 SPECIFIC PLAN FOR 380 ACRES OF LAND BOUNDED ON THE SOUTH BY 4TH STREET, ON THE EAST BY MILLIKEN AVENUE, ON THE NORTH BY THE A. T- & S. F. (METROLINK) RAILROAD, AND ON THE WEST BY CLEVELAND AVENUE AND UTICA AVENUE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 209-272-01, 04, 07, 08; 210-081-22, 23; 210-082-02, ~1, 17, 37, through 39; and 210-361-01 through 26- A. Recitals. 1. General Dynamics has filed an application for General Plan Amendment No. 93-02A as described in the title of this Resolution- Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On February 23, and March 23, ~994, The Planning Co~:nission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted workshops on the application. 3- On April 27, 1994, the Planning Comission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and, following the conclusion of said public hearing, adopted its Resolution No. 94-30, thereby recon=nending to the City Council that the application be approved- 4- On June 1, 1994, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 5- All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B · Resolution - NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2- Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. GPA 93-02A - GENERAL DYNAMICS June l, 1994 Page 2 a. The application applies to approximately 380 acres of land, located west of Milliken Avenue, between 4th Street and the A. T. & S- F. Railroad and is presently vacant, except for 75 acres developed with three industrial office buildings- Said property is currently under contiguous ownership and is designated as General Industrial and Industrial Park; b. The property to the north of the subject site is designated Heavy Industrial and is developed- The property to the west is designated General Industrial and Industrial Park and is primarily developed- The property to the east is designated General Industrial and Industrial Park and is primarily developed. The property to the south is designated the Ontario Center Specific Plan and is vacant; c. The application is part of a series of applications relating to a Subarea 18 Specific Plan, which contemplates a broad range of uses, such as recreational, hotel/conference center, retail, restaurant, and entertainment, as well as office, research and development, and light industrial uses surrounding an 18-hole public golf course; d. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan or the other elements of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; e. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element and all other elements of the General Plan; and f. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and an Envirom/nental Impact Report has been prepared and, concurrently with this application, by separate Resolution, is recouunended to the City Council for certification. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and b. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan and will not result in any internal inconsistencies with the General Plan. The detailed findings of conformity set forth in Exhibit "F" hereto are hereby incorporated by reference- 4- Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Council hereby approves General Plan Amendment No- 93-02A to amend the land use map from General Industrial and Industrial Park to Mixed Use and Open Space for 380 acres of land at the northwest corner of Milliken Avenue and 4th Street (see Exhibit "A") and amending the text of the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan, as follows: 236 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTEON NO. GPA 93-02A - GENERAL DYNAMICS June 1, 1994 Page 3 a. The following new major land use category shall be added, preceding Public Facilities, on page III-16, to read as follows: Mixed Use: The opportunity exists to mix different, but compatible, land uses and activities within mixed use developments- Mixed use developments are ideally suited for land within the downtown or adjacent to high activity nodes along major transportation corridors. The concept capitalizes on the ability of a mixed-use project to provide an integrated environment, to respond to evolving market conditions, to offer a variety of physical development types, and to create strong pedestrian orientation. Mixed use projects typically incorporate a mix of office, commercial, light industrial, and research oriented activities, and residential uses all clustered together into unified, highly identifiable developments. Entertainment, recreational, cultural, and convention uses may also be part of the mix. These projects bring an "urban scale" and are intended to become focal points within the community. Uses may be stacked within a single multi-use building or individually arranged together on a parcel. When built adjacent to, or in conjunction with, public transit facilities, a built-in ridership base is established." b. The following third paragraph shall be added to the Open Space subsection, page III-16, to read as follows: "Man-made open spaces, such as parks, golf courses, and common open spaces within residential housing projects, also help maintain an open character within the City. In particular, large open spaces, such as Heritage Park, Red Hill Park, the future Central Park, the future Subarea 18 golf course and the Red Hill Country Club golf course, provide significant vistas, and provide animal habitat, vegetation, and water resources in areas that would otherwise be developed without such features." c. The third paragraph under Location of Open Space, page IV-19, shall read as follows: 237 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. GPA 93-02A - GENERAL DYNAMICS June 1, 1994 Page 4 "The Foothill and Industrial Area Specific Plans, in their designs and use limitations, will encourage openness and quality within development projects, and also continue linkages of open space throughout the community. A large public golf course is planned to stretch from 4th Street to the A. T. & S. F. Railroad, west of Milliken Avenue, as the central open space amenity of the Subarea 18 Specific Plan." d- The Figure III-1 Land Use Plan and the Table III-2 Land Use Summary shall be revised to reflect the land use changes within the Subarea 18 Specific Plan (see Exhibit "A"). e- The Figure III-3 Circulation Plan shall be revised to delete Cleveland Avenue (see Exhibit "B"). f. The Figure III-4 Transit Concept Plan shall be revised to indicate a rail commuter line along the A- T. & S. F. Railroad and a rail commuter transfer station on the west side of Milliken Avenue at the A- T. & S. F- Railroad (see Exhibit "C"). g. The Figure III-10 Community Design Resources shall be revised to indicate the approximately 150-acre golf course contemplated within the Subarea 18 Specific Plan, between 4th Street and the A. T. & S. F. Railroad, west of Milliken Avenue, as a "Major Parks and Recreation" feature (see Exhibit "D")- h. The Figure IV-4 Open Space Plan shall be revised to indicate the approximately 150-acre golf course contemplated with the Subarea 18 Specific Plan, between 4th Street and the A. T. & S. F. Railroad, west of Milliken Avenue, as a "Proposed Park" (see Exhibit "E"). 5. Pursuant to provisions of California Public Resources Code Section 21089(b), this application shall not be operative, vested or final, nor will building permits be issued or a map recorded, until (1) the Notice of Determination (NOD) regarding the associated environmental action is filed and posted with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Bernardino; and (2) any and all required filing fees assessed pursuant to California Fish and Game Code Section 711.4, together with any required handling charges, are paid to the County Clerk of the County of San Bernardino. In the event this application is determined exempt from such filing fees pursuant to the provisions of the California Fish and Game Code, or the guidelines promulgated thereunder, except for payment of any required handling charge for filing a Certificate of Fee Exemption, this condition shall be deemed null and void. 6. The City Clerk to this Council shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. '4th Street CIty of Ontario LEGEND t//1 Heavy indusmd i~Mized Use EXHIBIT "A' 239 ,.I ................... '. .............'Figure III 3 I ................................... ~ I .... '~ s ..................... '- i ...... ' ........ ~,' ~."" "-' ~ .... "' -- ["! L_.'. i. CIRCULATION PLAN , ~--- .........-~-, ; i'7. I ~ = ,.. , ..o--- " .... ~ ' "'..- ..........""'v .....i ~-q, ! ,o,;,,,,,- COLLECTOR . ?:'----2:-ff .....i..,:o,,,0,,.,. ..... ......... ' q- ':i MAJOR ARTERIAL ........ I ' ! d /, __ .......... MAJOR DIV[)ISD - , -. "--.: ........... ARTERIAL d · EXISTING INTERCHANGE ·" ..... I ..... ~ ..... ~ ...... ~ ..... O PROPOSED INTERCHANGE \ j ~) FREEWAY INTERCHANGE · FII~EqIAY TO FIlELeeWAY, NO LOC,I,L ACCIEI! \ j ==~q= !1 GRADE SEPARATION ===.,~:....==.e==--=., · % - . · lITERSECTION FOR · . POSSELE WIDENING \ -:-' ~ j { .. -,,-- SPECIAL BOULEVARD ,... ~... ,J ' "' '; ~;; """. ~ SPECIAL DESIGN C~,,/,,.,,, [Z;-'] SPECIAL laPACT STUDY ZOIv .... i ;:';:,'l,' ;'= " ...."- .......:: """ ,,;\, IllIF, ;"j 7 '- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA I , s'~ i~ ~ ., 111-28 FIC-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-~RE II1-10 COMMUNITY DESIGN RESOURCES all CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA IV 2r EXHIBIT GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY This Exhibit assesses how the Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan and the proposed amendment to the Industrial Area Specific Pl'an and General Plan (the "project") furthers the objectives and policies of the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and whether the project will obstruct the attainment of these objectives and policies. Rather than attempt to analyze each individual objective, policy, or program set forth in the General Plan -- a process which would detract from understanding how the Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan relates to the Industrial Area Specific Plan and the General Plan as a whole -- the relationship between the Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan is discussed within the context of each of the principal components comprising the General Plan -- Land Use and Development, Environmental Resources, and Public Health and Safety -- with more detailed discussion reserved for those specific policies and objectives that are particularly germane to assessing the changes proposed relative to the current Industrial Area Specific Plan (IASP) and General Plan land use designations. A. Land Use and Development. 1. General Land Use Objectives. The General Plan identifies a number of key land use objectives that "are aimed at creating a City that functions efficiently, is exciting to leave in, and makes the best use of its various resources." A number of these objectives have been incorporated as principal objectives of the Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan, including: (i) encourage opportunities to mix different, but compatible land uses and activities; (ii) provide recreational, cultural, and employment opportunities to meet the needs of the community;(iii) coordinate industrial development to encourage an integrated industrial area with maximum flexibility and access to the regional circulation network; (iv) promote land use patterns that encourage non-motorized modes of transportation; and (v) organize land uses to promote maximal opportunity for transit usage. The project promotes these important objectives by establishing a more flexible, better integrated array of proposed land uses within the context of a Specific Plan. The expanded variety and mixture of uses established under the Sub-Area Specific Plan, in conjunction with changes in market demand and increased commercial development on the southern edge of the IASP, are expected to promote the land 211877 [2575711 - 1 - 12-APR-94. 00:34:21 244 use objectives identified in the General Plan, including those enumerated above. 2. General Land Use Policies. a. Industrial. The General Plan currently establishes three categories of industrial land uses: Industrial Park, General Industrial, and Heavy Industrial. The General Plan specifically reflects that the policies relating to industrial uses are "elaborated in the City's Industrial Area Specific Plan which outlines a much more detailed development program for this area." The General Plan describes "Industrial Park" uses as "planned grouped concentrations of industrial and research and development offices," which are "typically labor intensive, meaning that the number of employees per acre is high. The General Plan contemplates that these uses will be organized along major thoroughfares, including 4th Street, and "along the periphery of the industrial area and with convenient access to public transit." That portion of the project site currently located within IASP Sub-Area 12 is designated as Industrial Park under both the IASP and the General Plan. The IASP currently permits a variety of commercial uses within this Sub-Area, including professional/design services, administrative and office, research services, business support services, financial, insurance and real estate services, hotel, commercial and recreation facilities, including a golf course. The General Plan describes "General Industrial" land use as permitting a wide range of industrial activities including heavy commercial, and office uses. The General Plan states that "this land use is appropriate as a buffer between non-industrial uses and heavy industrial uses." That portion of the project site within current Sub-Areas 10 and 11 are designated "General Industrial" under the IASP and the General Plan. The IASP permits, or conditionally permits, office professional, design and research, indoor wholesale/retail commercial, and recreational facilities within this zone. Although all of the industrial uses and many of the commercial uses proposed under the Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan are permitted or conditionally permitted under the current IASP Industrial Park, and General Industrial designations, one of the express objectives of this project is to eliminate what are perceived as artificial and arbitrary divisions between the three existing Sub-Areas (for example, 211877 [25757] I - 2 - I I-APR-94 23:46:30 a number of uses which may be permitted in Sub-Area 12 may be prohibited or only conditionally permitted in Sub-Area I0 or 11). Specifically, by expanding the variety of commercial and recreational uses contemplated within the project site, the Property Owner intends to inject more creative and imaginative employment-generating designs and to help better integrate this portion of the southern boundary of the IASP with anticipated regional market trends. As a result, the Property Owner is proposing an amendment to the IASP ("IASP Amendment") to specifically incorporate the Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan and to concurrently amend the General Plan to reflect the IASP Amendment. While an amendment to the General Plan to reflect the IASP Amendment and the adoption of the Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan would, alone, appear to ensure consistency, it was also felt that the three categories of industrial use currently identified in the General Plan, while specifically acknowledging the need to provide for labor intensive office and commercial uses and non-industrial transitions within the industrial category could be construed narrowly, and thereby discourage the General Plan objectives (noted above) to promote planning flexibility and the mixture of different, but compatible land uses. As a result, the Property Owner has proposed an additional amendment to the General Plan to add a new category of land use entitled "Mixed-Use." The Mixed-Use category permits a wide range of a commercial and industrial activities including, medium, light, and custom manufacturing, research and development, office, recreation, mixed-use commercial, retail, and general commercial. Because the proposed uses within the areas designated Mixed-Use under the Sub-Area Specific Plan will also be designated Mixed-Use under the General Plan Amendment, consistency will be ensured. b. Open Space. The General Plan provides that open space areas must be maintained "in order to protect valuable natural resources, and to prevent development in areas considered unsafe because of environmental constraints". The General Plan contains a variety of "written and mapped policies to ensure that the resources are managed so that posterity can enjoy them." The IASP currently does not contain any open space district designations, although the IASP does permit, or conditionally permit, golf course uses within each of the three Sub-Areas currently comprising the project site. 211877 [2575711 - 3 - 11-APR-91 23:46:31 Although the applicant's proposed amendment to the General Plan to reflect the IASP Amendment and the adoption of the Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan would itself ensure consistency with the General Plan's policies relating to open space, the City has requested that instead of designating the Golf Course "Mixed-Use" along with the remainder of the Sub-Area 18, that this portion of the site be designated "Open Space" Because the current description of open space uses within the General Plan may be construed to refer specifically to the conservation of natural resources, an additional amendment to the definition of "Open Space" has been proposed to clarify that the Open Space designation may also include man-made open spaces, including golf course uses, within designated areas adjacent to residential, commercial, or industrial uses. The clarifying amendment will ensure project consistency with the General Plan. 3. Circulation. The General Plan establishes a circulation system for the City as a whole and the IASP area. The CirCulatio~ Plan established under the Sub-Area Specific Plan preserves this circulation system in all principal respects. However, the proposed vacation of a portion of Cleveland Avenue south of 6th Street and the redesignation of Cleveland north of 6th Street from a secondary arterial with an 88-foot right-of-way to a 66-foot local industrial collector, does require a corresponding amendment to the General Plan Circulation Plan. Because the project EIR indicates that no traffic impacts will occur as a result of ~the vacation and redesignation of Cleveland, the conforming General Plan amendment will ensure consistency with the policies and objectives of the General Plan. 4. Public Facilities. The General Plan contains a variety of objectives and policies designed to ensure that adequate public facilities and services will be maintained as the City develops. The proposed project is not expected to have any substantial impact on the City's Parks and Recreational Plan, or on schools. The establishment of a golf course as a central feature of the Specific Plan will promote a number of General Plan policies concerning the encouragement of recreational uses. 5. Community Design. The primary design goals identified in the General Plan are to promote the functional efficiency of the 211877 [2575711 - 4 - 11-APR-94 23:46:32 2A7 City, improve the City's image and appearance and to use development to express community character. The Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan promotes these primary objectives and the more detailed community design elements set forth in the General Plan by providing a unifying character to the project site through the adoption of a Specific Plan which incorporates a variety of land uses around a central golf course feature. Consistency is further ensured through the retention of existing City policies relating to performance standards, site development criteria, subdivision, master planning, and development and design review. Additionally, preservation of the principal features of the City Circulation Plan ensures that the objectives associated with maintaining travel routes will be promoted. The incorporation of project design features adjacent to the proposed Metrolink station further promotes these objectives. B. Environmental Resources. t. Land Resources. This section of the General Plan contains a number of objectives and policies designed to promote proper soil management techniques and to prevent the premature elimination of agricultural land whenever feasible. The Sub-Area Specific Plan will not change the impact of development on the existing grape vineyard uses on the site. The loss of this agricultural use was previously acknowledged as inevitable when the IASP was first adopted. By requiring subsequent development to comply with applicable City policies and procedures concerning soil management and grading activities, the Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan ensures compliance with the General Plan land resource objectives and policies. 2. Water Resources. The General Plan contains several objectives and policies designed to protect and enhance water resources. Compliance with applicable City policies and procedures as a condition to subdivision and Design Review approval ensure compliance with these policies and objectives. The EIR for the Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan concludes that no significant impacts to water resources will occur. 3. Open Space. The conforming amendments to the General Plan ensure consistency with the General Plan's policies and objectives concerning the preservation of open space. The 211877 [2575711 - 5 - 1 !-APR-94 23:46:32 establishment of a golf course will result in an increase in open space areas within the project site. 4. Energy. The General Plan identifies the objective of encouraging more efficient use of energy resources. The project EIR incorporates a number of mitigation measures specifically intended to promote this objective. Compliance with applicable City policies and regulations as a condition to subdivisions and Design Review approvals further ensures consistency with the General Plan's energy objectives and policies. C. Public Health and Safety. The General Plan sets forth a broad number of objectives and policies designed to ensure that subsequent development within the City will be sensitive to geologic, seismic, flood, fire, noise, air quality, crime, and emergency service concerns and hazards. The Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan preserves development and regulatory procedures from the IASP and the City Development Code as a means to mitigate potential impacts in each of the areas identified in the General Plan. Additionally, each of these areas are explored in more detail in the project EIR, which indicates that the changes from the current designations under the IASP will not result in any substantial additional impacts to the environment. Although the EIR indicates that development of the project site (under either the proposed Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan or the current IASP designations) will result in new sources of construction and operational air emissions, the Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan contemplates the adoption of a transportation demand management strategy consistent with the policies identified in the General Plan. In particular, the location of industrial and commercial uses in proximity to the proposed Metrolink station provides a mechanism to ensure that non-motorized transportation policies will be achieved. The incorporation of numerous mitigation measures dealing with the suppression of particulate emissions and the promotion of energy conservation further ensures consistency with the General Plan air quality objectives and policies. 211877 [2575711 6 11-APR-94 23:46:33 249 ORDINANCE NO. ~ ~ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 93-03, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN TO ESTABLISH A SUBAREA 18, AND OTHER RELATED AMENDMENTS, IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE SUBAREA 18 SPECIFIC PLAN, FOR 380 ACRES OF LAND BOUNDED ON THE SOUTH BY 4TH STREET, ON T~rE EAST BY MILLIKEN AVENUE, ON THE NORTH BY THE A. T- & S. F. (METROLINK) RAILROAD, AND ON THE WEST BY CLEVELAND AND UTICA AVENUES, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 209-272-01, 04, 07, AND 08; 210-081-22 AND 23; 210-082-02, 11, 17, 37, 38, AND 39; AND 210-361- 0~ THROUGH 26. A. Recitals. 1. General Dynamics has filed an application for Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment No. 93-03 as described in the title of this Ordinance. Hereinafter in this Ordinance, the subject Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On February 23, and March 23, 1994, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted workshops on the application. 3. On April 27, 1994, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and, following the conclusion of said public hearing, adopted its Resolution No. 94-31 , thereby recommending to City Council that this application be approved. 4. On June 1, 1994, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 5. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find, determine, and ordain as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. ISPA 93-03 - GENERAL DYNAMICS June 1, 1994 Page 2 a. The application applies to approximately 380 acres of land, located west of Milliken Avenue, between 4th Street and the A. T. & S. F. rail line and is presently vacant, except for 75 acres developed with three industrial office buildings. Said property is currently under contiguous ownership and is designated as General Industrial (Subareas 10 and 11) and Industrial Park (Subarea 12); b. The property to the north of the subject site is designated Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial (Subarea 9) and is developed. The property to the west is designated General Industrial (Subareas 10 and l~) and Industrial Park (Subarea 6) and is primarily developed. The property to the east is designated General Industrial (Subareas 10 and ~) and Industrial Park (SubarM 12) and is primarily developed. The property to the south is designated the Ontario Center Specific Plan and is vacant; c- The application is part of a series of applications relating to a Subarea ~8 Specific Plan, which contemplates a broad range of uses, such as recreational, hotel/conference center, retail, restaurant, and entertainment, as well as office, research and development, and light industrial uses surrounding an ~8-hole public golf course; d. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the Industrial Area Specific Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the Industrial Area Specific Plan and with related development; e. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the General Plan; and f. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and an Environmental Impact Report has been prepared and, concurrently with this application by separate Resolution, is recon~nended to the City Council for certification. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and b. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. c. That the amendments to the Industrial Area Specific Plan are consistent with the objectives of the City's Development Code, Ordinance No- 211, adopted December 7, 1983. 251 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. ISPA 93-03 - GENERAL DYNAMICS June 1, 1994 Page 3 d. That the Subarea 18 Specific Plan submitted in conjunction with the proposed amendment provides for: (1) The development of community within the District that is allowable under alternate regulations; a comprehensively planned urban superior to development otherwise (2) Development within the District in a manner consistent with the General Plan and related development and growth management policies of the City. (3) The construction, improvement, or extension of transportation facilities, public facilities, and public services required by development within the District. e. The proposed amendment will not adversely affect the public health, safety, or welfare; f. The actions taken and proposed to be taken by the City with respect to the proposed amendment and the corresponding change of zone have been and will be completed and reviewed in accordance with, and comply with, all applicable State and local laws and regulations. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Council hereby approves Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 93-03 to establish a Subarea 18 for 380 acres of land at the northwest corner of Milliken Avenue and 4th Street (see Exhibit "A"), and amending the text of the Industrial Area Specific Plan per the attached Exhibit "B." 5- Pursuant to provisions of California Public Resources Code Section 21089(b), this application shall not be operative, vested or final, nor will building permits be issued or a map recorded, until (1) the Notice of Determination (NOD) regarding the associated envirorunental action is filed and posted with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Bernardino; and (2) any and all required filing fees assessed pursuant to California Fish and Game Code Section 71~.4, together with any required handling charges, are paid to the County Clerk of the County of San Bernardino. In the event this application is determined exempt from such filing fees pursuant to the provisions of the California Fish and Game Code, or the guidelines promulgated thereunder, except for payment of any required handling charge for filing a Certificate of Fee Exemption, this condition shall be deemed null and void. 6- The Mayor and the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to published within ~5 days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. 252 I FOOTHILL BLVD;' g~' i:!:ii~i:':: ::::i:::::i~'::: 1-10 ............. S S $ I.~ $ / /.,,~ S · I I LEGEND Hem/Indusrzai I I exhibit A I ,~~ Industrial Area Specific Plan Land Use Amendment Michael Brzndm;m Associates * 1194 __ I tgOg..000f Rancno CuC41Rx~ga IASP SuB-Area 18 SOeohc ~_,/e~ II. URBAN DESIGN CONCEPT This section deals with the physical appearance of the Industrial Area. While more specific urban design guidelines for the Area are incorporated in Part III, this section describes the overall, Area-wide design concept addressing physical form and appearance, open space network, special features and gateways. Figure II-8 summarizes the Area-wide urban design policies. Physical Form and Appearance The Industrial Area has been divided into 16 subareas, each of which is designated with one of the four Land Use Categories. The development standards specified for each of these subareas will distinguish them from each other by the types of uses permitted or conditionally permitted, parcel sizes, setback requirements, landscaping, performance requirements, vehicular and rail access, and parking provisions. The distinction of each subarea would serve as a mechanism to create and enhance the identity of each subarea. The Industrial Area forms a part of the community fabric by integration into an arterial roadway network which serves the entire City. The area's identity is further enhanced by the development of specially designed landscape themes at arterial roadway entry points into the plan area. Each land use category is further distinguished by general architectural themes based upon the planned land use intensity. While the themes may vary, hiqh quality of desiqn is expected in all land use cateqories of the Industrial Specific Plan. There are ~ six land use categories in the Industrial Specific Plan: INDUSTRIAL PARK CATEGORY has been designated for five ~5} subareas. Primary uses in this category include custom light manufacturing, light wholesale storage and distribution, administrative and office, and professional services. This area is reserved for firms seeking attractive and pleasant working environment and a location which has prestige value. High quality architecture is required and site planning must emphasize a pedestrian oriented, campus-like setting with the greatest amount of landscaping. The development of prefab, all metal for sheathing of building is considered inappropriate for this category. The Industrial Park category is typically located adjacent to special boulevards {major thoroughfares) to enhance major gateways into the community and create a high quality image. In addition, the Industrial Park category is used as a transition from industrial to residential uses. II-4 GENERAL INDUSTRIAL CATEGORY has been established for seven ~7~ subareas. This category is intended to accommodate a wide range of light to medium manufacturing and wholesale, storage, distribution uses. Typically, administrative and office and professional services are not allowed to reduce potential land use conflicts. Design and technical standards are less demanding than the Industrial Park category, hut safeguards are provided to ensure a pleasant, well functioning environment. The development of prefab, all metal for sheathing of buildings is considered inappropriate for this category. MINIMUM IMPACT/HEAVY INDUSTRIAL is designated for Subarea 9. This category provides for heavy manufacturing and wholesale, storage, distribution uses which do not have a significant aesthetic impact on the surrounding area. Not permitted in this area are massive outside structures such as cranes, or unscreened storage of raw or finished products. Landscaping requirements in Subarea 9 along Arrow Highway have been increased to create a smoother transition to adjoining industrial park and general industrial property. HEAVY INDUSTRIAL CATEGORY has been designated in Subarea 15. Permitted uses include Medium, Minimum Impact, and Heavy Industrial Manufacturing and each of the wholesale, storage, distribution uses. Design and technical standards in this category allow massive outdoor structures and open air storage in an unscreened manner. A high degree of rail usage may also be typical. MIXED USE CATEGORY has been designated in a portion of Subarea 18. This category is intended to encourage the mix of different, hut compatible, land uses and activities within a single integrated development. Nixed use developments are ideally suited adjacent to high activity nodes along major transportation corridors, particularly adjacent to public transit facilities to establish a built-in ridership. Mixed use projects can incorporate a wide range of coeeeercial and industrial activities, including medium, light, and custom manufacturing; research and development; office; recreation; and coercial. OPEN SPACE has been designated for a portion of Subarea 18. Permitted uses include golf courses, outdoor recreation areas, and parks. The Plan also emphasizes the following areas: THE HAVEN AVENUE OVERLAY DISTRICT is located on both sides of Haven from Foothill Boulevard south to 4th Street. As the City develops, Haven Avenue will become a major north-south travel route and has a potential for high end office development with the unique combination of direct access to the Ontario Airport and Interstate 10 freeway. The standards in the Overlay District are designed to enhance Rancho Cucamonga's image by providing an intensive, high quality and prestigious gateway into the community. A progressive, sophisticated, and urban style of development is required and special site planning and landscaping requirements are included to enhance the pedestrian environment and create a campus-like atmosphere. II-5 INTERSTATE 15 !Devore Freeway) runs north-south through the industrial area and borders seven (7) subareas in each land use category except General Industrial/Rail Served. Since this area is directly south of the future regional mall and related commercial activities at 1-15 and Foothill Boulevard, and views along the freeway have a major impact on the image and identity of Rancho Cucamonga. Highest consideration should be given to design aspects that affect a positive image of the community as viewed from the freeway. Special consideration are contained in the Development Standards of each subarea which abutts the 1-15 freeway. {An 1-15 Overlay District could provide special development criteria to eliminate unsightly views.) II-6 256 Open Space Network Elements that constitute open space include parks, outdoor recreation areas, creeks and channels, transmission corridors, and stormwater retention areas. In addition, to the extent that they provide amenities, development setback areas, and street landscaping with associated pedestrian and bicycle paths, also compliment open space. As indicated in Figure II-8, easements for creeks and channels and powerline corridors traverse the Industrial Area, linking them with the City's region's, and National Forest open space areas. Directly south of 4th Street between Cucamonga Creek and Turner Avenue is Guasti Regional Park, comprised of approximately 200 acres, to which both Cucamonga and Deer Creek Channels connect. While all of these linear open space components run north/south, the Plan proposes east/west connections of open space, incorporating the ~M~ AXII ~ JJFJ ~~ setback requirements along major arterials, as well as related buffer landscaping provisions along certain land use edges, as elaborated in Part III. The private open space areas, developed internally within the planned industrial projects, should connect with the Area-wide open space network wherever possible, to avoid fragmentation of open space to unify the Area- wide appearance. The Rancho Cucammnga Adult Sports Park features 42 acres of active open space in the approximate l~cation of Arrow and R~chester. A proposed !O acre neighborhood park is located within the Industrial Area southwest of Arrow and Haven. A five acre mini-park is proposed along 6th Street between Hellman and Archibald. A 150 acre public golf course is proposed west of Milliken Avenue, between 4th Street and the A.T. & S.F. tracks. The course represents the largest contiguous open space element in the entire industrial area. II-lO RED HILl. SPECIAL STREEISCAPE/ LANDSCAPING ClM/tNELS AND CREEKS =-::--:::-POWER UNE/ iKIJEDU¢T EASEMENI~ u BRIDGES/VIADUCTS · .STO,¢ FOCUS ~ SIGNI~ LANDFORM '~ VIEW PENETRATIONS/ VISTAS ~ VIEWS CITY OF Special Features Special features refer to areas of visual, historic, and activity focal points within and near the Industrial Area. These are also shown in Figure XX~)) II-lO. These features should be respected and development and redevelopment around them should compliment and enhance their scale and character. The coordinated improvements of the special features and the corridors along which they are located, should further help unify the overall appearance of the Industrial Area and City. The old Cucamonga historic commercial center at the intersection of Foothill and Archibald and the location of Thomas Winery at the intersection of Foothill and Vineyard, are also of historic interest. A 42 acre Rancho Cucamonga Adult Sports Park featuring year-round sports activities, including the Rancho Cucamonga Stadium, is located on the west side of Rochester Avenue, south of Foothill Boulevard. A 150-acre public golf course is proposed to stretch from 4th Street to the A.T. & S.F. tracks, west of HiTliken, The course will provide significant vistas from 6th Street. Also along Foothill Boulevard near its interchange at 1-15 is proposed a major regional shopping center (over one million square feet of floor space containing six department stores on approximately 100 acres of land). This would be a significant commercial activity center of regional impact. Gateways Certain points of access to the City will, by use, become major entrances to the Industrial Area. A significant portion of the visitors' and users' impressions of the Industrial Area are influenced by conditions at these locations. Hence, it is imperative that special considerations be given to the development and design of these gateways areas. As shown in Figure II-1, gateway areas are identified along the major roadways that form the Industrial Area (and City} boundaries--4th Street, Foothill Boulevard, Etiwanda Avenue, and Arrow Route. The gateway of primary importance is located at the intersection of Haven and 4th. Other major gateways to the Industrial Area II-12 III. LAND USE PLAN Use of the industrial lands is organized to provide a broad range of industrial development opportunities ranging from light/industrial type of accommodations to sites for heavy, rail-served industrial plants. Based on consideration of road and rail access, the relationship to surrounding non-industrial uses, City-wide plan policies and the parcelization pattern, land within the Industrial Area is assigned to major land use categories: . Industrial Park - General Industrial _ Minimum Impact/HeavY Industrial - Heavy Industrial/Rail-Served _ Mixed Use - Open Space The definitions of the f~df six industrial land use categories follows in Table II-1, and the distribution of these uses are shown in Figure II-1 Land Use Plan. A more detailed definition of permitted and conditionally permitted uses is listed in Part III. II-15 260 TABLE II-I INDUSTRIAL LAND USE CATEGORIES INDUSTRIAL PARK GROUP. Land is reserved for industrial firms seeking an attractive and pleasant working environment and a location which has prestige value. Approximately I2~ 1,095 acres have been allocated to this use~ ~ ~ ~1. Industrial Park group designation permits light industrial uses, office and administration facilities, research and development laboratories, limited types of warehousing, as well as support businesses and commercial service uses. The Industrial Park areas are characterized by a high employment density. The development and design standards are developed to protect lands in this use group from development which is inappropriate due to either function, appearance or environmental affects. GENERAL INDUSTRIAL GROUP. This group provides for the widest possible range of light and medium industrial type activity, including manufacturing, assembling, fabrication, wholesaling, heavy commercial, and office uses; totaling approximately I~7~ 2,161 acres~ This land use category is appropriate as a buffer between non-industrial uses and heavy industrial uses. In these areas, the applicable development and design standards are less demanding than those of the industrial park areas, but safeguards are provided to ensure a pleasant well-functioning environment. The required land area per parcel is also less demanding than other industrial areas so as to accommodate smaller firms. MINIMUM IMPACT HEAVY INDUSTRIAL GROUP. Approximately 537 acres is reserved for minimum impact heavy industrial uses. The development standards are designed to provide for heavy industrial uses which will not significantly impact on the surrounding area. Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial activities include manufacturing, compounding, processing, fabrication, warehousing, storage and freight handling. Uses typical of this group include but are not limited to forge shops, steel milling facilities, plastic plants, steel fabrication, metal fabricating facilities, woodworking facilities, heavy machine shops and chemical storage and distribution. Not permitted within the area are uses which require massive structures outside of buildings or unscreened open air storage of larger quantities of raw, semi-refined, or finished products. II-16 261 TABLE II-? rContinued~ INDUSTRIAL LAND USE CATEGORIES HEAVY INDUSTRIAL GROUP. Approximately 675 acres ~ I~% of land east of Devore Freeway is reserved for Heavy Industrial Uses. The development standards are designed to provide for all heavy industrial uses. Heavy Industrial activities include manufacturing, compounding, processing, fabrication, warehousing, storage, and freight handling. Use characteristics of this group would include large structures to facilitate processing and open air storage of large amount of raw or semi-refined products. Uses within this area typically include but are not limited to; vehicular assembly plants, power plants~ concrete product manufactures and batch plants. MIXED USE. Approximately ?27 acres of land west of Milliken Avenue, between 4th and the A.T. & S.F. tracks, is reserved for mixed-use development. This land use category is characterize~ by various combinations of commercial, office, recreation, and industrial activities within an integrated development project. OPEN SPACE. Approximately 150 acres of land west of Milliken Avenue, between 4th and the A.T. & S.F. tracks, is reserved for open space. This land use category is characterized by natural or man-made open space which creates an attractive and pleasant environment for surrounding businesses. Uses within this area typically include golf courses, outdoor recreation areas and parks. II-!7 -- f__ I I ---.,,-. 120' ROW N)O' ROW - · 88' OR LESS ROW .... RAIL --- AQUEDUCT CREEK + ACCESS POeITS crrY OF Revised: 2117188 3/15/89 9119190 Roadway Cross-Sections Roadway Network Modifications Cross-sections for roadway requirements were determined based on mid-block roadway capacities. Major arterials with !20 foot right-of-way in the Industrial Area include: o North/south roadways of Haven Avenue, Day Creek Boulevard, and Milliken Avenue. East/west roadways of Foothill Boulevard, 6th Street between Haven Avenue and Interstate 15 and 4th Street. Major arterials with 100 foot right-of-way include: North/south roadways of Archibald Avenue, Rochester Avenue, Buffalo Avenue and Etiwanda Avenue. o East/west roadway of Arrow Route. Secondary arterials with 88 foot right-of-way include: o Vineyard Avenue, Hellman Avenue, ¢l~l~d ~Wd~ and 6th Street west of Haven Avenue. These streets will form the basic 1/2 mile grid system. The other streets, which will further divide the circulation network into 1/4 and 1/8 mile grids, will have rights-of-way ranging from 66 feet to 88 feet. Figure II-4 presents mid-block cross- sections of each street classification type with lane requirements. The following roadway modifications are recommended within the Industrial area. New Rochester. As discussed in the City-wide and Industrial Area Traffic Study and incorporated in the Industrial Area Plan, Rochester Avenue from 4th Street to Bth Street should be terminated north of 4th Street and connected to Buffalo Avenue. This will provide adequate distance for turning lanes between the Rochester and 1-15 ramp intersections along 4th and {in the future) 6th Streets. II-24 FIGURE 11-5 STREET CLASSIFICATION MAJOR ARTERIAL DIVIDED (120 ft. ROW) o Foothill o Haven o Milliken o 4th/ o 6th between Haven & I -15 120 ft. ROW 0 Day Creek B1 vd. MAJOR ARTERIAL (100 ft. ROW) o Archibald o Arrow o Buffalo o Etiwanda* o Rochester south of Foothill ! %-: .; ,, ,, 12 ft. 100 ft. ROW *Median island between Arrow and Foothill. II-24 266 SECONDARY (88 ft. ROW) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Vineyard He 11 man ~'/~'~'dl/~ G4 ft. 88 ft. ROW 6th West of Haven Turner jersey 8th West of Vineyard ALL LOCAL INDUSTRIAL (66 ft. ROW) o 8th (east of Vineyard) o 9th o Center o Santa Ani ta o O1 d Rochester o Baker o Other Local Streets 21' I 44 ft. ee ft. ROw (-11' II-25 267 Figure 11-6 DIRECTIONAL LANE AND RO.W. REQUIREMENTS AT INTERSECTIONS FOOTH ILL BLVD. ARROW ROUTE 131 "~-,-I 2.~-.//C 131 "~-,-1 "i~ ....~ ",. ,-. ~, - ' % l:::J, 131 1~ 231 / i~1' /I/~C~ t~:~I .,,~~)( 131 131 6TH ~ STREET ;~"~"' \ 1; 131 131 I ~ 7~'~ ~ I~~ 4TH STREET ~ ,~-3 ~.,L.~. <--- 3 ,,;1 - ;1 T~' ' """~ '.."," · . > ,h l'r'> 3~ ~'1' ~ I~N,,, 231 .× 1 31 HAVEN /CLE M ILLIKEN 11-30 268 ~TABLE II-4 LOCATIONS OF MEDIAN LEFT TURN OPENINGS ON MAJOR DIVIDED HIGHWAYS MAJOR STREET Haven Avenue Milliken Avenue Foot hi 11 Boulevard 6th Street 4th Street MEDIAN OPENING LOCATIONS Foothill Boulevard, Civic Center Drive, Arrow Route, Jersey Boulevard, 7th Street, 6th Street, Trademark Street, 4th Street. Foothill Boulevard, Day Creek Boulevard Extension, Arrow Route, Jersey Boulevard, 7th Street, 6th Street, 5th Street, 4th Street. Haven Avenue, Aspen Avenue, Spruce Avenue, Elm Avenue, Milliken Avenue, 1200' E/O Milliken Avenue, 1000' W/O Rochester Avenue, Rochester Avenue, Day Creek Boulevard, Route 15, Etiwanda Avenue, Cornell Avenue, East Avenue. Haven Avenue, Utica Avenue, Cleveland Avenue, 1300' E/O Cleveland Avenue, Milliken Avenue, Pittsburgh Avenue, 950' E/O Pittsburgh Avenue, Buffalo Avenue, Rochester Avenue, Old Rochester Avenue/Route 15. Archibald Avenue, Lucas Ranch Road, Turner Avenue, Center Avenue, Haven Avenue, Utica Avenue, 1300' E/O Uti ca Avenue, 1300' W/O Mil 1 i ken Avenu Milliken Avenue, Pittsburgh Avenue, Buffalo Avenue, Route 15. II-33 269 HOLT BLVD. ,0 m TRANSIT ROUTES OMAJOR TRANSIT TRANSFER AREAS +,.+ .,.H..'P6fElfT'hl~ COMMUTER RAIL FREEWAY/HOV LANES ,,,, BIKE ROUTES o o o o PEDESTRIAN ROUTES P PARK and RIDE REGIONAL MULTI-USE TRALS CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REVISED 411192 TABLE II1-1 (Continued) SUMMARY OF LAND USE TYPE BY SUBAREA USE TYPES COMMERCIAL Agricultural/Nursery Supplies & Services Animal Care Automotive Fleet Storage Automotive RentaVLeasing Automotive/Light Truck Repair-Minor Automotiverl'ruck Repair-Major Automotive Sales Automotive Service Court Automotive Service Station Building Contractor's Office & Yards Building Contractor's Storage Yard Building Maintenance Service Building & Light Equipment Supplies & Sales Business Supply Retail & Services Business Support Services Communication Services Convenience Sales & Services Eating & Drinking Establishments Entertainment Extensive Impact Commercial Fast Food Sales Financial, Insurance & Real Estate Services Food & Beverage Sales Funeral & Crematory Services Heavy Equipment Sales & Rentals Hotel/Motel Indoor Wholesale/Retail Commercial Laundry Services MedicaVHealth Care Services Personal Services Petroleum Products Storage Recreation Facilities Repair Services Specialty Building Supplies & Home Improvement P P P P P C C C C C C C C P P P C C C P C P C C P P C P C P C C C C C C C C C C P C P C C P P P P P C P C C P P P P P P P C C C C P C P P P P C C C C C C C C C C C C P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P C P C C P P P P P P P P P P P P C P P C P P P C C P P P P C P P P P P P P P P C P P P P C P P C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C P C C P P P C C P P P C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C P C P P P P P C C C C C C C P P P P P P P P C C C C C C C C C C C C CC CCC CC CC C C C C C C C C C C C C C P C C C P P P P P C P P P P P P C P P C P C C C P P NOTES: IP Induslriml Perk Hem Ave Oreday District GI Generil Induslrili MI/HI - Minimum Impact Heavy Incluslnal HI Heavy Industr~aJ P - Permitted Use C - Conditionally Permitted Use ["1 - Non-marked Uses Not Permitted Revised :6103/g2 111-5.A 271 TABLE II1-1 SUMMARY OF LAND USE TYPE BY SUBAREA USE TYPES MANUFACTU RING Custom Light Medium Heavy Minimum Impact Heavy P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P c c c P c P P P p p p P Administrative &Office P c c c P P c c P c C P P Professional/Design Services P c c c P P c C P c c P P Research Services WHOLESALE, STORAGE & DISTRIBUTION Public Storage Light Medium Heavy .MATERIALS RECOVERY FACILITIES Collection Facilities Processing Facilities Scrap Operation CIVIC Administrative Civic Services Cultural Extensive Impact Utility Facilities Flood Control/Utility Corridor Public Assembly Public Safety & Utility Services Religious Assembly p P p p p p p P p P p p P P p p p C P p c p p p p p p p p C P C P P P P P P P P P p C C c C C P P P C C c c P p p p p p p p p p p p p P C C C C C C C C C C C C C c P P P P P P P P P P P C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C c NOTES: IP - Indusgial Park HO - Haven Oreday District GI * General Indusmal MI/HI - Minimum Impact HeaW Indusmal HI - Heavy Induslnal ,,,~lJ -~ :~a P Permitted Use C Condition/h/Pertained Use r"'l - Non-marked uses not Permitted Revised: 6/03/92 111-5 2?2 SECONDARY (88 ft. ROW) Vineyard Hel 1 man 6th1 East of Devote Freeway Turner jersey Setback from P.L. -- 38 ft. Streetmelee end letIdleS Setback 1See Subarea 15, Special Consideration LOCAL INDUSTRIAL (66 ft. ROW) o 8th o 9th o Center o Santa Anita o (Old) Rochester o 7th West of Haven 11 tL Ilfeeteeeee _.. eel lulldial kiloel III'35 ~73 PART IV OVERLAY DISTRICTS & SUBAREA DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS INTRODUCTION This part provides development standards for the individual subareas of the I.S.P. and for specific sections of Haven Avenue which crosses through the industrial area. Because of the City-wide significance of Haven Avenue as the major entry into the City, the Haven Overlay District provisions have been placed at the beginning of this part followed by those of the subareams. The purpose of preparing subarea development standards is to identify the most prominent development standards applied within each of the 18 subareas in the industrial area. For each subarea the following categories have been identified and discussed: - Land Use Designation - Primary Function - Permitted Uses - Conditional Uses - Access and Circulation - Minimum Parcel Size - Setback Requirements - Landscape Area Requirements - Performance Standards - Special Considerations The list described above does not intend to cover every specific development requirement which may be utilized in developing within the industrial area, but does provide a quick overview of the major development considerations within each subarea. Any person interested in developing within the boundaries of the Specific Plan should refer to both Parts II and III of this plan for an indepth discussion of all the development constraints, opportunities, and standards. Any special conditions which may provide exception or modification to development requirement are discussed within the "Special Consideration" topic of each subarea. IV-1 FIG. IV- 12 8elleelS, OC olIQ CIRCULATION RAIL SERVICE 120' R.O.W. 100' R.O.W. 88' og les8 R.O.W, Existing PToposed TRAILS/ROUTES 0 0 0 0 Pede~,tflan I I S I 8icytie Multi-USe ~ Special Sheetscalps ~ LandScaping .................... Power Lme, Utdlty Easement ~eeSlalmm C/ceil & Chenne~k- I I I I Fke Station i Shefrlff Station Note: Parcel aries lind lot configurations ere shown Is IllIa'oxll~tkm Only. I The shoe shown may not be currently owned nor is the location site ~clfic. The depiction of · site Is an indication of a projected lutes ne4d that may be adjusted oval itme II isle City develops. 0 40U' HL)U' It .... Revised: 2/1//El8 SUBAREA 10 (Continued) Access and Circulation 120' Right-of-Way- Milliken 66' Right-of-Way - Old Rochester 7th Street All other Local Streets C1 evel and Minimum Parcel Size One ( 1 ) acre Setback Requirements (Measured from ulti- mate face of curb) Landscapi'ng Requi red Average Landscaping Parking Mil 1 iken 45' 25' (Old) Rochester 25' 15' 7th and all other " " 1 ocal streets 10% of the net lot area IV -66 Building 45' 25' SUBAREA 10 (Continued) Performance Standards Noise: The maximum allowable noise level of any use shall not exceed 75~n as measured at the lot line of the lot containing e use. Where a use occupies a lot abutting residentially zoned land, the noise level shall not exceed 65 Ldn as measured at the common lot line. Noise caused by motor vehicles and trains are exempted from this standard. Vibration: All uses shall be operated so as not to generate vibration discernible without instruments by the average person beyond the lot upon which the source is located. Vibration caused by motor vehicles, trains, and temporary constructi on or demol i ti on i s exempted from this standard. Particulate Matter and Air Contaminants: In addition to compliance with the Air Quality Maintenance District {AQMD} standards, all uses shall be operated so as not to emit particulate matter or air contaminants which are readi 1 y detectable without instruments by the average person beyond any 1 ot 1 i ne of the 1 ot contai ni ng such uses. Odor: All uses shall be operated so as not to emit matter causing unpleasant odors which are perceptible to the average person beyond any lot line of the lot contai ni ng such uses. Special Considerations: Humidity, Heat and Glare: All uses shall be operated so as not to produce humidity, heat, glare or high- intensity illumination which is perceptible without instruments by the average person beyond the lot line of any 1 ot contai ni ng such uses. Parcels which adjoin existing or proposed lead/spur rail lines as indicated on the Subarea Map are required to be developed in accordance with Rail Service Standards {Part III, Section G, Appendix D}. IV -67 277 FIG. IV-13 CIRCUL&TION 120' R.O.W. 100' R.O.W. 88' of lama R.O.W. RAIL SERVK;E | I I I I Esletln,{ TRAILS/ROUTES · · · · lacytie ~ S~e.cial Street·cape/ ~ Leedstilting .................... Powe~ Lm/ UUIIy Ease·eel I I I I Access Points Fke Station I Sheflirt SlitJoe I subarea 10 7lh '1 sub·e· 12 0 40U' 60U' 160Ue Note: Parcel ~$ iint conflgufltionl ale Ih0wn me 814xoxln~lllon ~. I ~l MIll shown may nol be cunanl~ owned nor Ii Ihe locilion IJll lHcilk:;. The depiction of · she Is an indication of · projected hat·l· need that may be adjusted over tlrrd a the Cily cievek)pe. SUBAREA 11 (Continued) Conditional Uses Access and Ci rcul ati on Admi ni strati ve and 0ffi ce Professional/Desi gn Services Public Storage Animal Care Automotive Fleet Storage Automotive Service Station Convenience Sales and Services Fast Food Sales Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Services Food and Beverage Sales Heavy Equipment Sales and Rental s Indoor Whol esal e/Retail Commercial Medical/Heal th Care Services Personal Services Petroleum Products Storage Processing Facil i ties Recreati on Faci 1 i ties Extensive Impact Utility Facilities Publ i c Assembly Public Safety and Utility Services Religious Assembly 120' Right-Of-Way - 6th Street Milliken IV -70 SUBAREA 1l (Continued} 66' Right-Of-Way - 7th Street ~west of Rochester~ All other Local Streets Cleveland Utica Minimum Parcel Size One-half (1/2) acre Setback Requirements (Measured from ulti- mate face of curb) Average Landscaping Parking Building 6th 45' 25' 45' Milliken " " " New Rochester " " " Cleveland 3~25' 2~15' 3~25' 7th and all 25' other local streets 15' 25' Landscaping Requirements Performance Standards 12% of the net lot area Noise: The maximum allowable noise level of any use shall not exceed 75~n as measured at the lot line of the lot containing e use. Where a use occupies a lot abutting residentially zoned land, the noise level shall not exceed 65L~n as measured at the common lot line. Noise caused y motor vehicles and trains are exempted from this standard. Vibration: All uses shall be operated so as not to generate vibration discernible without instruments by the average persons beyond the lot upon which the source is located. Vibration caused by motor vehicles, trains, and temporary construction or demolition is exempted from this standard. IV-71 SUBAREA 12 Land Use Designation Industrial Park Primary Function Permitted Uses Conditional Uses This area will provide for a high quality character to several entryways to the City. This area will also provide an opportunity for tourist oriented uses such as hotels and motels which relate to the airport activities. The subarea is located east of b4id~)dyt~ Mil 1 i ken, west of Devore Freeway, south of future alignment of 5th Street to 4th Street and extends along Mil 1 i ken to 6th Street. Custom Manufacturing Light Manufacturing Admi nistrati ve and Office Professional/Desi gn Services Research Services Light Wholesale, Storage and Distribution Buil ding Maintenance Services Business Supply Retail & Services Business Support Services Communi cati on Services Eating and Drinking Establishments Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Services Hotel/Motel Recreational Faci 1 i ties Admi ni strati ve C i vi c S ervi ces Flood Control/Util ity Corridor Automotive Rental/Leasing Automotive Sales Automotive Service Station Convenience Sales and Services Entertainment Fast Food Sales Food and Beverage Sales Medical/Heal th Care Services Personal Services Cultural Public Assembly Public Safety and Utility Services Religious Assembly IV -73 FIG. IV-14 CIRCULATION III 120' R.O.W. / 1OO' R.O.W. 88' Or bee RO.W. RAIL SERVICE :;;; | Exiltlng + + 1- *f + - PTopoeed TRAILS/ROUTES 0 0 0 0 Perleelfish · · · · 8lcycJe ,l[7 Jl J ReOk~ne! , Multi-Ues --~..~.v,---<:..~ Special SIfoeIsc..tpo ~ Lindsciplng .................... Power Line, .................... Utty Emil. mini Illleee~lmlll Creeks I Chtnnob I I I 1 Access Pomtl Fke Slallo~ I ShelFill Stile Note: Proeel lees end lot cofiNgursUonl me dN)wn as Nllxos~llon Only. I The litel Ihowll sly 11ol be CllTently Owned 11ol Jl the k)CllJol~ IRe Ii)lcllk;. The dep. lcllo;1 of · ells le in ilHMcetlon of · projected NIle need thai my be IdJuiled ovid' Ilul el the fly deve4ole. Revised: 5/2/90 SUBAREA 12 (Continued) Access and Circulation 120' Right-of-Way- 4th 6th Mil 1 i ken 100' Ri ght-of-Way - New Rochester IV -75 SUBAREA 12 (Continued) 66' Right' Of Way- (Old)Rochester Pittsburgh All other Local Streets Minimum Parcel Size Two (2) acres on parcels adjacent to 4th Street; and One (1) acre on remaining area. Setback Requirements (Measured from face of curb) Landscaping Requi red Performance Standards Average Landscaping Parking Building 4th 45' 25' 45' 6th " " " Mill i ken " " " New Rochester " " " O1 d Rochester 25' 15' 25' Pittsburgh and " " " all other local streets 15% of net lot area Noise: The maximum allowable exterior noise level of any use shall not exceed 65 dn as measured by any location on the lot occupied ~y such uses. Where a structure is occupied by more than one use, the noise level shall not be in excess of 60 dn as measured within the interior space of ~e neighboring establishment. Noise caused by motor vehicles are exempted from this standard. IV -76 FIG. IV-20 8UE ARIEA 18 IIIIII A.T.& S.F.R.R I 1111 r IllIll Sulmfee 11 I Subeea 9 ll*llllllllllltl IllIll SullBl'e8 11 Ith St Sul~,arel !l 4th St CIRCULATION ~ 120' R.O.W. ~ lOl)' R,O.W. 81' 0R LESS R.O.W. RAIL SERviCE I t I t i I EXISTleG Illttte|, TRII/ROUTES OOOO F,eDESTlt4N REGIONAL MULl14JgE ~ ~PECIAL STREETSCAPE/ LANDSCAPtlG UTILffY EASEtNT. '" POWERLIt. CREEKS I CHANNELS I I >HRIFF STATION (~FII~ STATION · 40f 1OO' leO' Note: Parcel Ilnel end lot conflgurlttonl Ire IhowR IS lpproxlmltlonl only. The litel shown my not be currently owned nor IS Ihe location life Ipeclflc. The deWlotion of I life II an Intcotlon of I profeot~ future need that my be aclJuelm:l ever tllfse ee tile CI!y develNI4. nEWSF. I~. 4r~n IV-104 SUBAREA 18 Land Use Designation Primary Function General Dynamics Rancho Cucamonga Specific Plan g3-01 The function of the subarea is to provide for a mixed- use development oriented around an 1B-hole golf course. This subarea is located south of the A.T. & S.F. tracks, west of Milliken Avenue, north of 4th Street, and east of Cleveland Avenue and Utica Avenue. Uses allowed and development standards are addressed in a separate document: the General Dynamics Rancho Cucamonga Subarea 18 Specific Plan. In the event of a conflict between the Industrial Area Specific Plan and the Subarea 18 Specific Plan, the Subarea 18 Specific Plan shall control. IV-lOS RESOLUTION NO. 94-23 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL CERTIFY THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE SUBAREA 18 SPECIFIC PLAN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. 1. There has been presented to this Commission, in conjunction with this Commission's consideration of the recommended adoption of the Subarea 18 Specific Plan, and related General Plan Amendment No. 93-02A, Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment No. 93-03, and Tentative Parcel Map 14647, a Final Environmental Impact Report. 2. The Final Environmental Impact Report referred to in this Resolution consists of that document dated January 1994, entitled "Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Subarea 18 Specific Plan," together with the draft Final Environmental Impact Report dated April 1994, including written comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Report and written responses thereto submitted by staff of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and testimony presented during the hearings on the recommended adoption of the said Specific Plan insolaf as that testimony pertained to the environmental matters, as well as the revised Executive Sununary, including revisions to mitigation measures, as well as the mitigation monitoring plan. Hereinafter, the above-referenced documents will be referred to as the "Final Environmental Impact Report." The entirety of the Final Environmental Impact Report is hereby incorporated in this Resolution by this reference. 3. On January 26, February 23, and April 27, 1994, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted duly noticed public hearings concerning environmental impacts of the proposed Subarea 18 Specific Plan and the companion amendments to the City's General Plan and Industrial Area Specific Plan (collectively, along with the approvals and actions described therein, the "project") and the adequacy of the Draft Environmental Impact Report for the project ("Draft EIR"). 4. The public con~uent on the Draft EIR was duly and lawfully closed on March 10, 1994, following due notice to the public and all applicable public agencies. 5. The Planning Commission has reviewed and considered the environmental documentation prepared to evaluate the proposed project, including the Final Environmental Impact Report. 6. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. FINAL EIR - GENERAL DYNAMICS April 27, 1994 Page 2 1. The Planning Commission hereby finds that the Final Environmental Impact Report was presented to the Planning Commission and that the information contained in the Final Environmental Impact Report has been independently reviewed and considered by members of the Planning Commission. The Final Environmental Impact Report and each of its components reflect the independent analysis and judgment of the City. 2. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council adopt: (i) the Statement of Findings (EIR) attached hereto as Attachment A; (ii) the Statement of General Plan Consistency attached hereto as Attachment B; (iii) the Statement of Overriding Considerations, attached hereto as Attachment C; and (iv) the Mitigation Monitoring Program attached hereto as Attachment D, based on the following recommended findings: a. The facts and findings set forth in the Statement of Findings (EIR), Statement of General Plan Consistency, and Statement of Overriding Considerations are supported by substantial evidence in the administrative record and the Final Environmental Impact Report. b. The Final Environmental Impact Report has identified all significant environmental effects of the project; there are no known potentially significant environmental impacts not addressed in the Final Environmental Impact Report. c. Although the Final Environmental Impact Report identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the project is approved, all significant effects that can feasibly be mitigated or avoided have been reduced to an acceptable level by the imposition of mitigation measures on the project. These mitigation measures are attached hereto as part of the Mitigation Monitoring Program and incorporated herein by this reference. d. Potential mitigation measures or project alternatives not incorporated into the project (including the "no-project" alternative) were determined to be infeasible based upon the considerations set forth in the Statement of Findings (EIR) and the Final Environmental Impact Report and other substantial evidence in the administrative record. The cumulative impacts of the project in relation to other projects in the area have been considered, and, except with respect to those unavoidable impacts described in the Statement of Findings (EIR), mitigation measures are incorporated into the project to reduce such impacts to insignificant levels. e. The unavoidable significant impacts of the project that have not been reduced to a level of insignificance, as identified in the Statement of Findings (EIR) and the Final Environmental Impact Report, have been substantially reduced in their impacts by the imposition of mitigation measures. The remaining unavoidable significant impacts are outweighed by the economic, social, technological, legal, and other benefits of the project, as set forth in the Statement of Overriding Considerations. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. FINAL EIR - GENERAL DYNAMICS April 27, 1994 Page 3 f. The Final Environmental Impact Report has described a reasonable range of alternatives to the project (including the "no-project' alternative), even though these alternatives might impede the attainment of project objectives and might create other significant economic, social, legal, technological, or environmental impacts. A good faith effort was made to incorporate alternatives in the preparation of the Draft EIR, and reasonable alternatives were considered in the review process of the Final Environmental Impact Report and the ultimate decisions on the project. 3. This Planning Commission does hereby recommend that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga certify that the Final Environmental Impact Report has been prepared on the Subarea 18 Specific Plan in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act, California Public Resources Code Sections 21000 et esq. ("CEQA") with State and City Guidelines for implementing CEQA and all other regulations promulgated with respect thereto, and with all other applicable laws and regulations thereunder. Further, that the Council certifies that it has considered the contents of the Final Environmental Impact Report in considering the adoption of the Subarea 18 Specific Plan, together with General Plan Amendment No. 93-02A, Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment No. 93-03, and Tentative Parcel Map 14647; 4. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED ANn }3M~D HIO~27TH DAY OF APRIL 1994. SSION OF THE CI_~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA 1 BY: ry I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of April 1994, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARKER, LUMPP, MCNIEL, MELCHER, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE AESENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE 301 ATTACHMENT A STATEMENT OF FINDINGS AND FACTS (EIR) This Statement of Findings and Facts for the Sub- Area 18 Specific Plan Final Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") is divided into three sections. Section A sets forth the City's findings with respect to the environmental impacts of the Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan, the concurrent amendments to the City's General Plan and Industrial Area Specific Plan (IASP), and all other approvals and actions necessary to implement the foregoing as described therein (collectively, the "project"). This section has been further divided into ten subsections, addressing each of the areas of potential impact identified in the EIR. Section B sets forth the City's findings with respect to significant unavoidable adverse impacts, and has been divided into three subsections -- one for each area of potential unavoidable impact. Section C sets forth the City's findings with respect to alternatives to the proposed project, and has been divided into five subsections, one for each of the alternatives considered in the EIR. This Statement of Findings and Facts (EIR) is based upon the entire administrative record for the project, which is hereby incorporated by reference, and includes, without limitation, the EIR, the conditions of approval of the Sub- Area 18 Specific Plan, and testimony provided by members of the public, as well as cou~aents by the Planning CoLf~aission and the City Council, during the hearings on the project before the Planning Commission and the City Council. The findings contained herein and in the Statement of General Plan Consistency (Attachment B) and the Statement of Overriding Considerations (Attachment C) are not inclusive, but rather are intended to supplement the findings set forth in the attached Resolution. The statement of facts in support of the City's findings are also not inclusive, but rather are intended to identify certain of the principal facts in the administrative record which support the findings contained herein. Additional facts in support of the City's findings may be found in the EIR, the conditions of approval of the Subarea 3 Specific Plan, the Mitigation Monitoring Program (Attachment D), the various staff reports prepared for both the Planning Commission and the City Council, the minutes from the various public hearings on the project, and the administrative record as a whole. All references to "project design considerations" shall include, without limitation, the Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan, the 211880 [2575711 - 1 - 13-APR-94 09:52:43 3O2 corresponding amendments to the City's General Plan and the IASP, and all conditions of approval of the Specific Plan. Effects Determined Not To Be Significant or Mitigated to a Level of Insignificance. With respect to each of the ten areas in which potentially significant environmental effects could occur, the City finds, as provided below, that these potential impacts have been avoided or substantially lessened by virtue of project design considerations and the mitigation measures described in the EIR and the Mitigation Monitoring Program, each of which are hereby incorporated by reference. The following facts and conclusions reflected in the EIR and the administrative record support these findings: 1. Land Use. The current General Plan and IASP designations for the project site ("General Industrial" and "Industrial Park"} have been amended to "Open Space" (with respect to the Golf Course} and "Mixed-Use" (with respect to the reminder of the project site). Development of the project site under these designations would include a broader mix of uses, particularly co~f~ftercial, office, retail, and recreational uses, and greater development flexibility than is allowed under existing land use designations. The changes proposed are consistent with the general objectives and policies of the General Plan, as described further in the Statement of General Plan Consistency (attached hereto as Appendix B), and the expansion of uses, including the addition of commercial and recreational uses, would enhance the project's compatibility with the approved commercial uses in areas south of the project site. The project includes vacating and reclassifying portions of Cleveland Avenue. Cleveland Avenue is not considered a key roadway within the City circulation system due to its limited existing and planned access points. Conforming amendments to the General Plan and the IASP ensure consistency with the City's circulation system. No substantial traffic impacts will occur as a result of the street vacations contemplated by the project. The Project will have a significant unavoidable impact on the loss of agricultural lands. These impacts are discussed further in Section B below. 1880 12~757]1 - 2 - 13-APR-94 09:52:43 3O3 2. Traffic and Circulation. A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) has been prepared for the project in accordance with the standards set forth in the San Bernardino County Congestion Management Plan (CMP). The TIA has been incorporated in the EIR and is consistent with and conforms to the requirements set forth in the CMP. Based upon maximum buildout of the project site at the full density permitted under the Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan, the project would generate approximately 64,600 vehicle trip ends and approximately 7,800 p.m peak hour trips. This level of traffic represents only an incremental increase over the traffic that would arise under a full build out pursuant to existing IASP land use designations. The project will incrementally exacerbate potentially deficient levels of service at a number of intersections within and outside the City, and will also contribute to potential level of service deficiencies at two additional intersections, Haven Avenue/Fourth Street and 1- 15 southbound ramps/Fourth Street. However, roadway improvements sufficient to maintain acceptable levels of service are identified in the EIR and mitigation measures have been incorporated to require full frontage and intersection improvements as well as payment of city-wide transportation development fees to offset the project's impacts to both the City circulation system and offsite intersections and interchanges. Because the project will contribute to cumulative impacts to the regional circulation system, resulting in reductions of levels of service, these impacts have been identified as significant and unavoidable and are discussed further below. 3. Noise. The project may result in temporary short-term construction noise impacts. Mitigation measures have been incorporated to reduce the noise generated from construction activity. Given the distance between the project site and the nearest residential area, the residual noise impacts remaining after mitigation are not considered significant. The cumulative vehicular traffic, rail, and stationary source noise adjacent to Sixth Street has the potential of resulting in significant noise impacts on outdoor golf course areas that are used on an ongoing basis (i.e., eating areas) in conjunction with structures located on the golf course (i.e., the club house). To the extent these outdoor activity areas are impacted beyond the 70 dBA 211880 [2575711 -3- April 27, 1994 Ldn, mitigation measures are identified to reduce noise to levels deemed acceptable under the General Plan. 4. Air Ouality. The grading and construction activities associated with the development of the project site will result in emissions of CO, NOx, PM10, and ROC which exceed the threshholds of significance established by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). Numerous mitigation measures have been identified to reduce construction related emissions to the extent feasible; however, insofar as construction-related emissions still exceed SCAQMD thresholds for CO, NOx, and ROC, they are identified as significant and unavoidable. These impacts are discussed further in Section B below. Project operational emissions, due principally to emissions from vehicle trips, would be comparable to those produced under current IASP designations. The project's incremental increase in regional emissions would only exceed the SCAQMD thresholds for CO. However, according to the Environmental Impact Report prepared for the 1991 Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP), which is incorporated in the EIR, regional emissions of CO will meet Federal and State ambient air quality standards by the target year 2010 after application of identified mitigation measures on a regionwide basis. Air modeling results indicate that the project will not produce local CO concentrations in excess of State and Federal standards. The project is in conformity with the 1991 AQMP. It will contribute to the attainment of subregional job/hoUsing performance targets and will implement regional growth management objectives and reduce vehicle miles traveled (VMT) and vehicle trips (VT) through the application of transportation demand management strategies. Mitigation measures have been incorporated which reduce VMT and VT to the greatest extent feasible. 5. Soils and Geology. The project site is not located in the vicinity of known active or inactive faults, and the potential for seismic or geologic related impacts is not considered significant. The potential for subsidence and differential compaction will be addressed through mitigation requiring subsurface geotechnical investigations prior to issuance of grading permits. 211880 12575711 - 4 - 13-APR-94 09:52:45 305 6. Hydrology. Drainage, and Water Ouality. Due to the proposed Golf Course, development of the project site would result in approximately 40% less impervious surface than under the existing IASP designations. Storm drain improvements will be installed as development progresses to convey the post-development on- site stormflows into the existing storm drain facilities adjacent to the site. Identified mitigation measures require compliance with applicable storm water quality requirements. 7. Biological Resources. A biological survey of the site, including focused surveys for the Delhi Sands Flower Loving Fly, San Diego Horned Lizard and Orange-Throated Whiptail, were conducted and indicate that no significant habitat will be impacted by development of the project. The project site has been substantially disturbed from decades of agricultural activities, uses of the existing building parcels, and grading associated with previous subdivision activities. Although further development will result in an incremental addition to the on-going regional conversion of open space to urban uses and related loss of foraging/nesting opportunities for human-tolerant species, this loss is likely to be less than that associated with the current IASP (due to the presence of the Golf Course), was contemplated in the General Plan and IASP as a product of the conversion of agricultural lands, and is not considered significant due to the site's isolation from other large natural open-space areas by existing urban development. 8. Public Services and Utilities. Although the project would incrementally increase the level of water consumed and wastewater generated, the impacts of the project would be less than those under existing IASP designations, and the Cucamonga County Water District has adequate capacity to provide water and accept wastewater discharges. Appropriate water conservation measures have been incorporated. The project would increase the generation of solid waste, but adequate facilities would be available to accept this waste, and the inclusion of source reduction and recycling mitigation ensures that no significant impact will occur. Because the project will help address an existing jobs/housing imbalance in the region, it may not have any 1880 125757]1 - 5 - 13-APR-94 09:52:46 readily identifiable effect on schools. To the extent the project has indirect, incremental impacts on schools, these impacts will be mitigated to a level of insignificance through payment of school mitigation fees and participation in the tax increment pass through arising as a result of the project's location within the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Plan area. 9. Energy Demand and Conservation. The project will result in less electrical and natural gas demands than that which would arise under existing IASP designations. Existing and planned utility facilities are available to adequately serve the planned growth within the district, and mitigation has been incorporated to require appropriate conversation measures. 10. Hazardous Materials. Development of the project site may introduce industrial land uses that could generate hazardous materials; however, due to the overall reduction in hazardous material-related uses compared to the current IASP, the proposed project would likely have a beneficial impact in reducing hazardous material-related risks. Residual impacts of historic pesticide use are not considered a significant constraint on development. Any health risks associated with potential asbestos-containing materials in the existing buildings will be addressed by compliance with applicable SCAQMD notification and removal requirements. B. Significant Unavoidable Impacts. The EIR identified three areas in which potentially significant impacts would remain after mitigation. With respect to each of these impacts, the City finds that changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which substantially lessen the significant environmental effects identified. Additional mitigation of cumulative regional impacts is within the responsibility and jurisdiction of other public agencies, and not the City. With respect to any remaining impacts within the City's jurisdiction, specific economic, social, environmental, legal, and technological considerations make infeasible additional mitigation measures. The following facts and conclusions reflected in the EIR and the administrative record support these findings: 211880 12575711 - 6 - 13-AIIt-94 09:52:47 307 11. The Loss of Agricultural Lands. The loss of agricultural lands within the project site was anticipated and accepted in the Cit~'s General Plan and the IASP. The project would not result in any new impacts from the development contemplated in the IASP. The loss of open space values associated with the conversion from agricultural use has been mitigated by the inclusion of the Golf Course, which will constitute the largest contiguous open space area within the IASP district. 12. Cumulative Traffic. As noted in Section A.2, the project will contribute to cumulative impacts to the regional circulation system, resulting in reductions of levels of service. The EIR identifies regional circulation improvements which, when constructed, would preserve CMP levels of service (i.e., LOS E). With respect to those improvements located within the City, a mitigation measure requires the project proponent to install full frontage improvements, including ultimate intersection geometrics, upon development and to pay the City's Transportation Development Fee as contribution toward city-wide impacts. With respect to improvements outside of the City, a mitigation measure requires participation, on a fair-share basis, in a regionally-adopted mitigation fee ~rogram. Further mitigation of cumulative regional impacts is beyond the control of the City or the applicant. The residual project traffic impacts are considered an incremental change from those that would arise under the IASP. 13. Air Oualitv. As noted in Section A.4, air emissions from certain phases of construction and operation of the project are anticipated to exceed SCAQMD thresholds of significance. Mitigation measures designed to reduce the level of construction and vehicle emissions have been incorporated to the extent feasible. Upon implementation of the mitigation measures identified in the EIR, no local exceedances of Carbon Monoxide will occur, and the application of mitigation measures set forth in the 1991 AQMP on a region- wide basis will mean that the project will not contribute to any violations of Federal and State standards. The project is in conformity with the policies and goals of the 1989 Growth Management Plan and the 1991 AQMP. Any remaining cumulative impacts are beyond the jurisdiction and control of the applicant or the City to mitigate further. 211880 [2575711 -7- April 27, 1994 308 C. Project Alternatives. The EIR identifies a total of five alternatives to the proposed project. The City finds that the range of alternatives discussed in the EIR is reasonable. With respect to each of the alternatives identified, the City finds that: (i) such alternatives cannot feasibly attain the basic objectives of the project; (ii) specific economic, social, environmental, legal, or technological considerations make the proposed alternatives infeasible; and (iii) these same factors are overriding considerations which warrant rejection of the alternatives in favor of the proposed project. The following facts and conclusions reflected in the EIR and the administrative record support these findings: 1. No-Project/No Development Alternative. Although this alternative could reduce the potential for significant unavoidable local impacts in the three areas were project mitigation would not be fully effective in doing so -- loss of agricultural lands, cumulative traffic impacts, and exceedantes of SCAQMD emission thresholds -- the benefits produced by retention of the project site in its existing undeveloped state are considered'minimal, and, as described further in the Statement of Overriding Considerations incorporated herein, are outweighed by more compelling and substantial social, economic, and legal considerations. The project-specific impacts cited in the EIR as "unavoidable" all reflected a cumulative diminution or exacerbation of regional resources. These impacts would not be fully addressed even under the no project alternative. The substantial loss of agricultural lands acknowledged and accepted at the time the City adopted its General Plan would occur with or without development on the proposed project site. The failure to develop the project site would merely shift absorption of co~uttercial and industrial uses, and associated traffic generation, to other properties either within or outside the City, and perhaps do so in a manner less compatible with the growth management objectives of the 1991 AQMP and the 1989 Growth Management Plan. For the same reason, the reduction of air pollutant emissions would not be expected to have any material impact on the regional emission inventory (and the project's local air quality impacts have already been mitigated to a level of insignificance). 211880 [2575711 - 8 - 13-APR-94 09:52:48 3O9 Conversely, preservation of the project site in an undeveloped state would be expected to have substantial socio-economic and legal repercussions. This alternative would perpetuate existing uneconomic agricultural activities in direct contravention to the goals and objectives stated in the City's General Plan and the IASP. Assuming such preservation is accompanied by a down-zoning of the project site, the project applicant would undoubtedly raise legal concerns about the deprivation of economically beneficial uses of the project site. More generally, the project site comprises a substantial percentage of the remaining undeveloped portion of the IASP area and would, if left undeveloped, deprive the City of thousands of jobs and millions of dollars in tax revenue, including tax increment to be used by the City's Redevelopment Agency to achieve the important redevelopment objectives set forth in the City's Redevelopment Plan. Because this alternative could not reasonably attain any of the basic objectives of the project, which contemplate improving planning flexibility so as to facilitate development and better promote the job and revenue-generating objectives of the General Plan, it is considered infeasible. 2. Development Under Current IASP Designations. On the whole, this alternative would have substantially the same environmental impacts as the proposed project. The impacts from this alternative were analyzed in the EIR based upon assumed development at a level less than the "worst case" build-out assumptions used in assessing impacts from the proposed project. In this respect, a comparison of the proposed project with the current IASP likely overstates the actual differences between the two. In some areas, most notably biological resources, energy consumption, and public facilities, the proposed project is likely to produce incrementally fewer impacts than this alternative due to the presence of the Golf Course and the de-emphasis of industrial uses. To the extent this alternative would produce any substantial environmental benefits over the proposed project, the substantial social and economic benefits noted below, which are described further in the Statement of Overriding Considerations incorporated herein, substantially outweigh these benefits. With respect to the feasibility of this alternative, changing market conditions have led to the reevaluation of the type of zoning within the project site that would best achieve some of the principal objectives 211880 [2575711 - 9 - 13-APR-94 09:52:49 310 identified in the General Plan and the Redevelopment Plan: (i) encouraging opportunities to mix different, but compatible land uses and activities; (ii) providing recreational, cultural, and employment opportunities to meet the needs of the community; (iii) coordinating industrial development to encourage an integrated industrial area with maximum flexibility and access to the regional circulation network; (iv) promoting land use patterns that encourage non-motorized modes of transportation; and (v) organizing land uses to promote maximal opportunity for transit usage. While the existing IASP designations could, in theory, have achieved these objectives (at least in part), changes in market conditions due to a glut of industrial warehouse space and increased competition, along with substantial constraints arising as a result of the project's location in three separate subareas within the IASP, greatly diminished the prospects for attracting end-users and thereby impaired the development potential of the site. The introduction of the Golf Course, along with (i) a more coordinated integration of uses between planning areas, (ii) more advantageous use of the rail lines to the north (chiefly in conjunction with a proposed Metrolink Station) and the major roadway arterials adjacent to the site (Milliken, Fourth Street, and Sixth Street), and (iii) a more flexible mix of uses with greater emphasis on commercial, office, retail, and recreational uses, are all features of the proposed project which improve the project site's ability to achieve the above-stated goals. The IASP alternative would not be likely to achieve these goals within any forseeable time period. Buildings. IASP With Re-Use of Existing On-Site This alternative would have substantially similar environmental, social, and economic impacts and benefits as the second alternative analyzed above. Due to the more intense development associated with the re-use of the existing building parcels, environmental impacts of this alternative would be greater than those associates with Alternative 2. For the same reasons noted above, it is questionable whether this alternative would be environmentally superior to the proposed project. Although this proposed alternative would improve the marketability and development potential of the 75 acre existing building parcels, it would not alter the IASP land use designations for the remainder of the project site and would, therefore, suffer from the same constraints discussed in Section C.2 above. Thus, for the same reasons noted 2! 1880 {25757]1 - 10- 13-APR-94 09:52:50 311 above, this alternative could not reasonably attain the principal objectives of the project within reasonably foreseeable time periods. Additionally, to the extent that any minimal environmental benefits exist under this alternative, they are substantially outweighed by the socio- economic factors identified earlier. 4. Residential Development Alternative. Under this alternative, the project site would be primarily developed with residential dwelling units surrounding an 18 hole public golf course. The introduction of such a substantial number of dwelling units (over 2,500) over such a substantial portion of the remaining industrial lands within the City could result in significant incompatibilities with on-site and surrounding land uses and would represent a significant departure from the land use objectives currently identified in the General Plan, the IASP, and the Redevelopment Plan. Although this alternative would result in fewer vehicles trips, and would potentially reduce the level of air emissions, noise, and energy consumption, the substantial incompatibilities resulting from the introduction of so many sensitive receptors to an area already developed with industrial uses would offset any perceived environmental benefits of this alternative and render it environmentally inferior to the proposed project. To the extent that any environmental benefits accrue under this alternative, such benefits would be substantially outweighed by the socio-economic factors described in the Statement of Overriding Considerations. Additionally, because this alternative would not achieve the job-generating objectives identified by the City, it is considered "infeasible." 5. Alternative Site. As described more fully in the EIR, the ability to select an alternative site for implementation of the type of golf course-oriented multi-use project contemplated by the City would be significantly constrained by the remaining area available for industrial development and by the amount of contiguous acreage necessary to implement these objectives. The largest piece of undeveloped land in the IASP encompasses only approximately 160 acres, and would be barely adequate enough to construct an 18 hole golf course. Other sites within the City would either be too small or would require substantial zoning and General Plan amendments to preserve land use consistency. For these and other reasons, an alternative site for the project could not 880 l?.5757] 1 - 11 - i 3-APR-9,$ 09:52:51 312 reasonably achieve the project's objectives, and are therefore considered infeasible. 211880 [25757]1 - 12 - 13-APR-94 09:52:51 313 ATTACHMENT B STATEMENT OF GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY This Attachment assesses how the Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan and the proposed amendment to the Industrial Area Specific Plan and General Plan (the "project") furthers the objectives and policies of the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and whether the project will obstruct the attainment of these objectives and policies. Rather than attempt to analyze each individual objective, policy, or program set forth in the General Plan -- a process which would detract from understanding how the Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan relates to the Industrial Area Specific Plan and the General Plan as a whole -- the relationship between the Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan is discussed within the context of each of the principal components comprising the General Plan -- Land Use and Development, Environmental Resources, and Public Health and Safety -- with more detailed discussion reserved for those specific policies and objectives that are particularly germane to assessing the changes proposed relative to the current Industrial Area Specific Plan (IASP) and General Plan land use designations. A. Land Use and Development. 1. General Land Use Objectives. The General Plan identifies a number of key land use objectives that "are aimed at creating a City that functions efficiently, is exciting to leave in, and makes the best use of its various resources." A number of these objectives have been incorporated as principal objectives of the Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan, including: (i) encourage opportunities to mix different, but compatible land uses and activities; (ii) provide recreational, cultural, and employment opportunities to meet the needs of the co~fLunity;(iii) coordinate industrial development to encourage an integrated industrial area with maximum flexibility and access to the regional circulation network; (iv) promote land use patterns that encourage non-motorized modes of transportation; and (v) organize land uses to promote maximal opportunity for transit usage. The project promotes these important objectives by establishing a more flexible, better integrated array of proposed land uses within the context of a Specific Plan. The expanded variety and mixture of uses established under the Sub-Area Specific Plan, in conjunction with changes in market demand and increased commercial development on the southern edge of the IASP, are expected to promote the land ~1&569 [~5~21 1 13-APR-94 09:50:23 314 use objectives identified in the General Plan, including those enumerated above. 2. General Land Use Policies. a. Industrial. The General Plan currently establishes three categories of industrial land uses: Industrial Park, General Industrial, and Heavy Industrial. The General Plan specifically reflects that the policies relating to industrial uses are "elaborated in the City's Industrial Area Specific Plan which outlines a much more detailed development program for this area." The General Plan describes "Industrial Park" uses as "planned grouped concentrations of industrial and research and development offices," which are "typically labor intensive, meaning that the number of employees per acre is high. The General Plan contemplates that these uses will be organized along major thoroughfares, including 4th Street, and "along the periphery of the industrial area and with convenient access to public transit." That portion of the project site currently located within IASP Sub-Area 12 is designated as Industrial Park under both the IASP and the General Plan. The IASP currently permits a variety of co~f~ftercial uses within this Sub-Area, including professional/design services, administrative and office, research services, business support services, financial, insurance and real estate services, hotel, cou~.ercial and recreation facilities, including a golf course. The General Plan describes "General Industrial" land use as permitting a wide range of industrial activities including heavy commercial, and office uses. The General Plan states that "this land use is appropriate as a buffer between non-industrial uses and heavy industrial uses." That portion of the project site within current Sub-Areas 10 and 11 are designated "General Industrial" under the IASP and the General Plan. The IASP permits, or conditionally permits, office professional, design and research, indoor wholesale/retail commercial, and recreational facilities within this zone. Although all of the industrial uses and many of the commercial uses proposed under the Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan are permitted or conditionally permitted under the current IASP Industrial Park, and General Industrial designations, one of the express objectives of this project is to eliminate what are perceived as artificial and arbitrary divisions between the three existing Sub-Areas (for example, 214569 [257~73 1 - 2 - 13-APR-94 09:50:24 315 a number of uses which may be permitted in Sub-Area 12 may be prohibited or only conditionally permitted in Sub-Area 10 or 11). Specifically, by expanding the variety of commercial and recreational uses contemplated within the project site, the Property Owner intends to inject more creative and imaginative employment-generating designs and to help better integrate this portion of the southern boundary of the IASP with anticipated regional market trends. As a result, the Property Owner is proposing an amendment to the IASP ("IASP Amendment") to specifically incorporate the Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan and to concurrently amend the General Plan to reflect the IASP Amendment. While an amendment to the General Plan to reflect the IASP Amendment and the adoption of the Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan would, alone, appear to ensure consistency, it was also felt that the three categories of industrial use currently identified in the General Plan, while specifically acknowledging the need to provide for labor intensive office and coa~f~ercial uses and non-industrial transitions within the industrial category could be construed narrowly, and thereby discourage the General Plan objectives (noted above) to promote planning flexibility and the mixture of different, but compatible land uses. As a result, the Property Owner has proposed an additional amendment to the General Plan to add a new category of land use entitled "Mixed-Use." The Mixed-Use category permits a wide range of a commercial and industrial activities including, medium, light, and custom manufacturing, research and development, office, recreation, mixed-use coa~uercial, retail, and general coa~f~ercial. Because the proposed uses within the areas designated Mixed-Use under the Sub-Area Specific Plan will also be designated Mixed-Use under the General Plan Amendment, consistency will be ensured. b. Open Space. The General Plan provides that open space areas must be maintained "in order to protect valuable natural resources, and to prevent development in areas considered unsafe because of environmental constraints". The General Plan contains a variety of "written and mapped policies to ensure that the resources are managed so that posterity can enjoy them." The IASP currently does not contain any open space district designations, although the IASP does permit, or conditionally permit, golf course uses within each of the three Sub-Areas currently comprising the project site. 21456~ [25757] 13-APR-94 09:50:25 316 Although the applicant's proposed amendment to the General Plan to reflect the IASP Amendment and the adoption of the Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan would itself ensure consistency with the General Plan's policies relating to open space, the City has requested that instead of designating the Golf Course "Mixed-Use" along with the remainder of the Sub-Area 18, that this portion of the site be designated "Open Space". Because the current description of open space uses within the General Plan may be construed to refer specifically to the conservation of natural resources, an additional amendment to the definition of "Open Space" has been proposed to clarify that the Open Space designation may also include man-made open spaces, including golf course uses, within designated areas adjacent to residential, commercial, or industrial uses. The clarifying amendment will ensure project consistency with the General Plan. 3. Circulation. The General Plan establishes a circulation system for the City as a whole and the IASP area. The Circulation Plan established under the Sub-Area Specific Plan preserves this circulation system in all principal respects. However, the proposed vacation of a portion of Cleveland Avenue south of 6th Street and the redesignation of Cleveland north of 6th Street from a secondary arterial with an 88-foot right-of-way to a 66-foot local industrial collector, does require a corresponding amendment to the General Plan Circulation Plan. Because the project EIR indicates that no traffic impacts will occur as a result of the vacation and redesignation of Cleveland, the conforming General Plan amendment will ensure consistency with the policies and objectives of the General Plan. 4. Public Facilities. The General Plan contains a variety of objectives and policies designed to ensure that adequate public facilities and services will be maintained as the City develops. The proposed project is not expected to have any substantial impact on the City's Parks and Recreational Plan, or on schools. The establishment of a golf course as a central feature of the Specific Plan will promote a number of General Plan policies concerning the encouragement of recreational uses. 5. Community Design. The primary design goals identified in the General Plan are to promote the functional efficiency of the 21&569 [257573 1 - 4 - 13-APR-94 09:50:26 317 City, improve the City's image and appearance and to use development to express community character. The Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan promotes these primary objectives and the more detailed community design elements set forth in the General Plan by providing a unifying character to the project site through the adoption of a Specific Plan which incorporates a variety of land uses around a central golf course feature. Consistency is further ensured through the retention of existing City policies relating to performance standards, site development criteria, subdivision, master planning, and development and design review. Additionally, preservation of the principal features of the City Circulation Plan ensures that the objectives associated with maintaining travel routes will be promoted. The incorporation of project design features adjacent to the proposed Metrolink station further promotes these objectives. B. Environmental Resources. 1. Land Resources. This section of the General Plan contains a number of objectives and policies designed to promote proper soil management techniques and to prevent the premature elimination of agricultural land whenever feasible. The Sub-Area Specific Plan will not change the impact of development on the existing grape vineyard uses on the site. The loss of this agricultural use was previously acknowledged as inevitable when the IASP was first adopted. By requiring subsequent development to comply with applicable City policies and procedures concerning soil management and grading activities, the Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan ensures compliance with the General Plan land resource objectives and policies. 2. Water Resources. The General Plan contains several objectives and policies designed to protect and enhance water resources. Compliance with applicable City policies and procedures as a condition to subdivision and Design Review approval ensure compliance with these policies and objectives. The EIR for the Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan concludes that no significant impacts to water resources will occur. 3. Open Space. The conforming amendments to the General Plan ensure consistency with the General Plan's policies and objectives concerning the preservation of open space. The 214569 (257573 1 - 5 - 13-APR-94 09:50:27 318 establishment of a golf course will result in an increase in open space areas within the project site. 4. Energy. The General Plan identifies the objective of encouraging more efficient use of energy resources. The project EIR incorporates a number of mitigation measures specifically intended to promote this objective. Compliance with applicable City policies and regulations as a condition to subdivisions and Design Review approvals further ensures consistency with the General Plan's energy objectives and policies. C. Public Health and Safety. The General Plan sets forth a broad number of objectives and policies designed to ensure that subsequent development within the City will be sensitive to geologic, seismic, flood, fire, noise, air quality, crime, and emergency service concerns and hazards. The Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan preserves development and regulatory procedures from the IASP and the City Development Code as a means to mitigate potential impacts in each of the areas identified in the General Plan. Additionally, each of these areas are explored in more detail in the project EIR, which indicates that the changes from the current designations under the IASP will not result in any substantial additional impacts to the environment. Although the EIR indicates that development of the project site (under either the proposed Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan or the current IASP designations) will result in new sources of construction and operational air emissions, the Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan contemplates the adoption of a transportation demand management strategy consistent with the policies identified in the General Plan. In particular, the location of industrial and commercial uses in proximity to the proposed Metrolink station provides a mechanism to ensure that non-motorized transportation policies will be achieved. The incorporation of numerous mitigation measures dealing with the suppression of particulate emissions and the promotion of energy conservation further ensures consistency with the General Plan air quality objectives and policies. 21~,569 [~57~73 1 - 6 - 13-APR-94 09:50:27 319 ATTACHMENT C STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS The City of Rancho Cucamonga proposes to approve the proposed Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan and related amendments to the General Plan and Industrial Area Specific Plan (along with the other actions and approvals described therein, the "project"). A Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR} has been prepared for the project, and certain project-related environmental impacts have been identified which cannot be completely avoided through mitigation: i.e., the loss of agricultural lands, cumulative traffic impacts, and exceedantes of SCAQMD air quality emission thresholds. Based upon the EIR and other information in the administrative record, the following overriding considerations are provided against which these unavoidable adverse effects are balanced in reaching a decision on this project. On balance, the remaining unavoidable adverse effects are found acceptable given the overriding considerations contained herein. will: The City finds that implementation of the project 1. Help implement a number of key objectives in the General Plan by encouraging an integrated industrial area with maximum flexibility and access to the regional circulation network, promoting land use patterns that encourage non-motorized modes of transportation, and organizing land uses to promote maximum opportunity for job creation and transit usage. 2. Improve the City's fiscal balance, thereby enabling the City to provide and enhance public services and facilities. 3. Help implement the City Redevelopment Plan by substantially improving the development potential of the project site, integrating such development in a highly- amenitized setting which includes an 18-hole public golf course, and improving the potential to generate tax increment revenues which may be used to achieve other important objectives of the Plan. 4. Help improve the overall quality of life within the community by promoting a more dynamic mix of recreational, cultural, and employment opportunities. 214550 [25757] 1 13-APR-94 10:50:58 320 5. Substantially increase the amount of open space within the City's industrial area by introducing an 18-hole public golf course. 6. Assist in achieving a major local and regional planning goal by providing jobs within a jobs-poor subregion. The City also finds on the basis of the EIR and other information in the record referenced in Attachments A and B to the accompanying Resolution (which are hereby incorporated by reference), that additional mitigation measures or alternatives which might further reduce or eliminate the significant impacts of the project cannot be feasibly accomplished in a successful manner considering the various economic, environmental, social, legal and technological factors involved. In this regard, any unavoidable impacts which would result from project implementation are principally a product of cumulative and regional growth trends, would occur under implementation of the current IASP land use designations, and would be unlikely to be avoided in the long term even if no further development on the project site occurred. This factor is an additional consideration in weighing the substantial benefits outlined above and provides an additional basis for concluding that the project's unavoidable impacts are overriden by the significant benefits offered by the project. 214550 [25757] 1 -2- 13-APR-94 10:50:58 321 RESOLUTION NO. 94-29 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF SPECIFIC PLAN 93-01, THE SUBAREA 18 SPECIFIC PLAN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. 1. General Dynamics has filed an application for Specific Plan 93-01, as described in the title of this Resolution, hereinafter referred to as the "application." 2. On January 26, February 23 and March 23, 1994, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted meetings on the application. 3. On April 27, 1994, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing concerning the recommended adoption of the Subarea 18 Specific Plan, hereinafter referred to at the "Plan." 4. The Plan comprises approximately 380 acres, currently under contiguous ownership, and located generally north of 4th Street, south of the A. T. & S. F. rail line, east of Utica Avenue and Cleveland Avenue, and west of Milliken Avenue, all referenced in the attached Conceptual Development Plan, Exhibit "A." 5. On file in the City Clerk's office, and incorporated herein by this reference, is a full, true, and correct copy of the Plan. 6. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct; 2. Prior to the adoption of this Resolution, this Commission has reviewed the Final Environmental Impact Report for the Plan, General Plan 93-02A, Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 93-03, and Tentative Parcel Map 14647, and recommended that the City Council certify the Report, including adoption of a Statement of Overriding Consideration, in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. -'~---' SP 93-01 - GENERAL DYNAMICS April 27, 1994 Page 2 3. Prior to the adoption of this Resolution, this Commission has reviewed and recommended approval of General Plan Amendment No. 93-02A, and Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 93-03, and recommended adoption by the City Council. 4. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission, including, without limitation, evidence presented during the above-referenced public hearing, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The Plan is consistent with and will promote the Land Use Policies and other elements of the General Plan. The detailed findings of consistency set forth in Exhibit "B" attached hereto are hereby incorporated by reference; b. The Plan is consistent with the objectives of the City's Development Code, Ordinance No. 211, adopted December 7, 1983; c. The Plan will not adversely affect the public health, safety, or welfare; Plan; d. The Plan is consistent with the City's Industrial Area Specific e. The actions taken and proposed to be taken by the City with respect to the adoption of the Plan and the corresponding change of zoning designation have been and will be completed and reviewed in accordance with, and comply with, all applicable State and local laws and regulations. 5. This Commission hereby finds that the Plan has been drafted to include, in text and accompanying diagrams, all of the information as follows: a. The distribution, location, and extent of the land uses, including open space, within the area covered by the Plan; b. The proposed distribution, location, extent, and intensity of major components of public and private transportation, sewage, water, drainage, solid waste disposal, energy, and other essential infrastructure proposed to be located within the area of the Plan and needed to support the land uses described in the Plan; c. The standards and criteria by which development will proceed for land uses within the Plan and standards for the conservation, development, and utilization of natural resources, where applicable, within the area of the Plan; and d. A description of the implementation measures, including regulations, programs, public works projects, and financing measures necessary to carry out those provisions, referenced in subparagraphs a, b, and c above within the area of the Plan. 323 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. SP 93-01 - GENERAL DYNAMICS April 27, 1994 Page 3 6. This Commission hereby recommends that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopt Specific Plan 93-01, the Subarea 18 Specific Plan, subject to the following conditions: 1) Within 45 days of City Council approval, a revised Plan text, Final EIR, and Mitigation Monitoring Plan incorporating the changes required shall be submitted to the Community Development Director for review and approval. Upon acceptance by the Community Development Director, a total of 25 unbound, 3-hole punch, copies of these documents shall be submitted for distribution to the City Council, the City Clerk, the Planning Commission, and staff. In addition, one unbound original copy each, and one executable copy each on a 3.5 inch computer diskette in a format acceptable to City, shall be submitted. 2) A copy of this Resolution shall be included within the Plan text after the title page. 3) Utilities shall be undergrounded per Planning Commission Resolution No. 87-96 , with the following understanding: a) 4th Street - The golf course developer shall be responsible for undergrounding along the golf course frontage of 4th street. Said undergrounding may be deferred until the development of Planning Areas V, VI, or VII, if secured by an in-lieu fee. b) 6th Street - The golf course developer shall be responsible for undergrounding utilities between Cleveland Avenue and the westerly boundary of Planning Area IX at the time of the golf course development. c) A. T. & S. F. Rail Line - Utilities shall be undergrounded with the golf course development. 4) The applicant shall prepare supplemental design guidelines to create a distinguishing character for the 380 acre project. The guidelines shall include unifying design concepts for entry statements, signage, and street furniture (e.g., lighting standards, bollards, benches, etc.). The guidelines shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Commission prior to the application for development of any planning area, except for the golf course. 324 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. SP 93-01 - GENERAL DYNAMICS April 27, 1994 Page 4 7. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. BY: a~er, !ha~~' ATTEST: i r~ I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of April 1994, by the following vote-to-wit. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARKER, LUMPP, MCNIEL, MELCHER, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE Sixth Sule Pt. ANNING AIM II ~ As'~m I i l?l ~ Iq. ANNING ,, PLANNING ARIA VI Note: This figure represents the current proposed Land Use Ran for Sub- Area 18 and may be sul:Nect to future refinements and/or modifications. Refer to Section 4.2 Land Use Plan, TaDie 5- I Summary Land Use Oy Planning Area and Table 5.2 Lan~ Use Type Definitions tot types ol land uses perrrnttem in I~anning areas. Michact Br4ndman A. ssociaca · 12J93 Conceptual Development Plan Rand'to CucamoncJa IASP SuO-Area 18 Specffic EXHIBIT GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY This Exhibit assesses how the Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan and the proposed amendment to the Industrial Area Specific Plan and General Plan (the "project") furthers the objectives and policies of the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and whether the project will obstruct the attainment of these objectives and policies. Rather than attempt to analyze each individual objective, policy, or program set forth in the General Plan -- a process which would detract from understanding how the Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan relates to the Industrial Area Specific Plan and the General Plan as a whole -- the relationship between the Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan is discussed within the context of each of the principal components comprising the General Plan -- Land Use and Development, Environmental Resources, and Public Health and Safety -- with more detailed discussion reserved for those specific policies and objectives that are particularly germane to assessing the changes proposed relative to the current Industrial Area Specific Plan (IASP) and General Plan land use designations. A. Land Use and Development. 1. General Land Use Objectives. The General Plan identifies a number of key land use objectives that "are aimed at creating a City that functions efficiently, is exciting to leave in, and makes the best use of its various resources." A number of these objectives have been incorporated as principal objectives of the Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan, including: (i) encourage opportunities to mix different, but compatible land uses and activities; (ii) provide recreational, cultural, and employment opportunities to meet the needs of the community;(iii) coordinate industrial development to encourage an integrated industrial area with maximum flexibility and access to the regional circulation network; (iv) promote land use patterns that encourage non-motorized modes of transportation; and (v) organize land uses to promote maximal opportunity for transit usage. The project promotes these important objectives by establishing a more flexible, better integrated array of proposed land uses within the context of a Specific Plan. The expanded variety and mixture of uses established under the Sub-Area Specific Plan, in conjunction with changes in market demand and increased commercial development on the southern edge of the IASP, are expected to promote the land 21 i877 [25757ll - 1 - 12-APR-94. 00::14:21 327 use objectives identified in the General Plan, including those enumerated above. 2. General Land Use Policies. a. Industrial. The General Plan currently establishes three categories of industrial land uses: Industrial Park, General Industrial, and Heavy Industrial. The General Plan specifically reflects that the policies relating to industrial uses are "elaborated in the City's Industrial Area Specific Plan which outlines a much more detailed development program for this area." The General Plan describes "Industrial Park" uses as "planned grouped concentrations of industrial and research and development offices," which are "typically labor intensive, meaning that the number of employees per acre is high. The General Plan contemplates that these uses will be organized along major thoroughfares, including 4th Street, and "along the periphery of the industrial area and with convenient access to public transit." That portion of the project site currently located within IASP Sub-Area 12 is designated as Industrial Park under both the IASP and the General Plan. The IASP currently permits a variety of commercial uses within this Sub-Area, including professional/design services, administrative and office, research services, business support services, financial, insurance and real estate services, hotel, commercial and recreation facilities, including a golf course. The General Plan describes "General Industrial" land use as permitting a wide range of industrial activities including heavy commercial, and office uses. The General Plan states that "this land use is appropriate as a buffer between non-industrial uses and heavy industrial uses." That portion of the project site within current Sub-Areas 10 and 11 are designated "General Industrial" under the IASP and the General Plan. The IASP permits, or conditionally permits, office professional, design and research, indoor wholesale/retail commercial, and recreational facilities within this zone. Although all of the industrial uses and many of the commercial uses proposed under the Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan are permitted or conditionally permitted under the current IASP Industrial Park, and General Industrial designations, one of the express objectives of this project is to eliminate what are perceived as artificial and arbitrary divisions between the three existing Sub-Areas (for example, 1877 [257~7|1 - 2 - 11-APR-9~ 23z4~:30 a number of uses which may be permitted in Sub-Area 12 may be prohibited or only conditionally permitted in Sub-Area l0 or 11). Specifically, by expanding the variety of commercial and recreational uses contemplated within the project site, the Property Owner intends to inject more creative and imaginative employment-generating designs and to help better integrate this portion of the southern boundary of the IASP with anticipated regional market trends. As a result, the Property Owner is proposing an amendment to the IASP ("IASP Amendment") to specifically incorporate the Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan and to concurrently amend the General Plan to reflect the IASP Amendment. While an amendment to the General Plan to reflect the IASP Amendment and the adoption of the Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan would, alone, appear to ensure consistency, it was also felt that the three categories of industrial use currently identified in the General Plan, while specifically acknowledging the need to provide for labor intensive office and commercial uses and non-industrial transitions within the industrial category could be construed narrowly, and thereby discourage the General Plan objectives (noted above) to promote planning flexibility and the mixture of different, but compatible land uses. As a result, the Property Owner has proposed an additional amendment to the General Plan to add a new category of land use entitled "Mixed-Use." The Mixed-Use category permits a wide range of a commercial and industrial activities including, medium, light, and custom manufacturing, research and development, office, recreation, mixed-use commercial, retail, and general commercial. Because the proposed uses within the areas designated Mixed-Use under the Sub-Area Specific Plan will also be designated Mixed-Use under the General Plan Amendment, consistency will be ensured. b. Open SPace. The General Plan provides that open space areas must be maintained "in order to protect valuable natural resources, and to prevent development in areas considered unsafe because of environmental constraints". The General Plan contains a variety of "written and mapped policies to ensure that the resources are managed so that posterity can enjoy them." The IASP currently does not contain any open space district designations, although the IASP does permit, or conditionally permit, golf course uses within each of the three Sub-Areas currently comprising the project site. 211877 [2575711 3 I I-APR-gaI. 21:46:31 329 Although the applicant's proposed amendment tc the General Plan to reflect the IASP Amendment and the adoption of the Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan would itself ensure consistency with the General Plan's policies relating to open space, the City has requested that instead of designating the Golf Course "Mixed-Use" along with the remainder of the Sub-Area 18, that this portion of the site be designated "Open Space". Because the current description of open space uses within the General Plan may be construed to refer specifically to the conservation of natural resources, an additional amendment to the definition of "Open Space" has been proposed to clarify that the Open Space designation may also include man-made open spaces, including golf course uses, within designated areas adjacent to residential, commercial, or industrial uses. The clarifying amendment will ensure project consistency with the General Plan. 3. Circulation. The General Plan establishes a circulation system for the City as a whole and the IASP area. The Circulation Plan established under the Sub-Area Specific Plan preserves this circulation system in all principal respects. However, the proposed vacation of a portion of Cleveland Avenue south of 6th Street and the redesignation of Cleveland north of 6th Street from a secondary arterial with an 88-foot right-of-way to a 66-foot local industrial collector, does require a corresponding amendment to the General Plan Circulation Plan. Because the project EIR indicates that no traffic impacts will occur as a result of the vacation and redesignation of Cleveland, the conforming General Plan amendment will ensure consistency with the policies and objectives of the General Plan. 4. Public Facilities. The General Plan contains a variety of objectives and policies designed to ensure that adequate public facilities and services will be maintained as the City develops. The proposed project is not expected to have any substantial impact on the City's Parks and Recreational Plan, or on schools. The establishment of a golf course as a central feature of the Specific Plan will promote a number of General Plan policies concerning the encouragement of recreational uses. 5. Community DesiGn. The primary design goals identified in the General Plan are to promote the functional efficiency of the 2 | 1877 [25757|1 - 4 - 11 -APR-94. 23:46:32 City, improve the City's ~mage and appearance and to use development to express community character. The Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan promotes these primary objectives and the more detailed community design elements set forth in the General Plan by providing a unifying character to the project site through the adoption of a Specific Plan which incorporates a variety of land uses around a central golf course feature. Consistency is further ensured through the retention of existing City policies relating to performance standards, site development criteria, subdivision, master planning, and development and design review. Additionally, preservation of the principal features of the City Circulation Plan ensures that the objectives associated with maintaining travel routes will be promoted. The incorporation of project design features adjacent to the proposed Metrolink station further promotes these objectives. B. Environmental Resources. 1. Land Resources. This section of the General Plan contains a number of objectives and policies designed to promote proper soil management techniques and to prevent the premature elimination of agricultural land whenever feasible. The Sub-Area Specific Plan will not change the impact of development on the existing grape vineyard uses on the site. The loss of this agricultural use was previously acknowledged as inevitable when the IASP was first adopted. By requiring subsequent development to comply with applicable City policies and procedures concerning soil management and grading activities, the Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan ensures compliance with the General Plan land resource objectives and policies. 2. Water Resources. The General Plan contains several objectives and policies designed to protect and enhance water resources. Compliance with applicable City policies and procedures as a condition to subdivision and Design Review approval ensure compliance with these policies and objectives. The EIR for the Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan concludes that no significant impacts to water resources will occur. 3. Open Space. The conforming amendments to the General Plan ensure consistency with the General Plan's policies and objectives concerning the preservation of open space. The 211877 [25757|1 - 5 - 11-APR-94 23:46:32 331 establishment of a golf course will result in an increase in open space areas within ~he project site. 4. Energy. The General Plan identifies the objective of encouraging more efficient use of energy resources. The project EIR incorporates a number of mitigation measures specifically intended to promote this objective. Compliance with applicable City policies and regulations as a condition to subdivisions and Design Review approvals further ensures consistency with the General Plan's energy objectives and policies. C. Public Health and Safety. The General Plan sets forth a broad number of objectives and policies designed to ensure that subsequent development within the City will be sensitive to geologic, seismic, flood, fire, noise, air quality, crime, and emergency service concerns and hazards. The Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan preserves development and regulatory procedures from the IASP and the City Development Code as a means to mitigate potential impacts in each of the areas identified in the General Plan. Additionally, each of these areas are explored in more detail in the project EIR, which indicates that the changes from the current designations under the IASP will. not result in any substantial additional impacts to the environment. Although the EIR indicates that development of the project site (under either the proposed Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan or the current IASP designations) will result in new sources of construction and operational air emissions, the Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan contemplates the adoption of a transportation demand management strategy consistent with the policies identified in the General Plan. In particular, the location of industrial and commercial uses in proximity to the proposed Metrolink station provides a mechanism to ensure that non-motorized transportation policies will be achieved. The incorporation of numerous mitigation measures dealing with the suppression of particulars emissions and the promotion of energy conservation further ensures consistency with the General Plan air quality objectives and policies. 211877 [25757]1 - 6 - 11-APR-94 23:46:33 332 ORDINANCE NO. ~~ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SPECIFIC PLAN 93-01, THE SUBAREA 18 SPECIFIC PLAN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF- A. Recitals. (i) On January 26, February 23, and March 23, 1994, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted meetings on the Specific Plan. On January 26, and continued to February 23, 1994, and on April 27, 1994, the Commission conducted duly noticed public hearings on the related Environmental Impact Report. On April 27, 1994, the Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing concerning the recommended adoption of the Subarea 18 Specific Plan, hereinafter referred to as the "Plan"- (ii) On June 1, 1994, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing concerning the adoption of the Plan. (iii) The Plan comprises approximately 380 acres of land bounded on the south by 4th Street, on the east by Milliken Avenue, on the north by the A.T. & S.F. (Metrolink) Railroad, and on the west by Cleveland Avenue and Utica Avenue, all as referenced in the Conceptual Land Use Plan, Figure 4-4, of the Plan- (iv) On file in the City Clerk's office, and incorporated herein by this reference, is a full, true, and correct copy of the Plan. (v) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance- NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find, determine, and ordain as follows: This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts as set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. Prior to the adoption of this Ordinance, this Council has reviewed the Final Environmental Impact Report for the Plan, General Plan 93-02A and Industrial Specific Plan Amendment 93-03 and certified the Report, including adoption of a Statement of Overriding Considerations, in compliance with the California Environmental CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. SPECIFIC PLAN 93-01 - GENERAL DYNAMICS June 1, 1994 Page 2 Quality Act of 1970, as amende<, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder- Prior to the adoption of this Ordinance, this Council has adopted General Plan Amendment No. 93-02A and Industrial Specific Plan Amendment 93-03- This Council hereby finds that the Plan has been drafted to include, in text and accompanying diagrams, all of the information as follows: The distribution, location, and extent of the land uses, including open space, within the area covered by the Plan; and The proposed distribution, location, extent, and intensity of major components of public and private transportation, sewage, water, drainage, solid waste disposal, energy, and other essential infrastructure proposed to be located within the area of the Plan and needed to support the land uses described in the Plan; and The standards and criteria by which development will proceed for land uses within the Plan and standards for the conservation, development and utilization of natural resources, where applicable, within the area of the Plan; and A description of the implementation measures, including regulations, programs, public works projects, and financing measures necessary to carry out those provisions referenced in subparagraphs a, b, and c above within the area of the Plan- This Council hereby adopts Specific Plan 93-01, the Subarea 18 Specific Plan, on file in the City Clerk's office and incorporated herein by this reference, subject to each and every environmental mitigation measure set forth in full, in the "Mitigation Monitoring Plan" for the Rancho Cucamonga Industrial Area Specific 18 Specific Plan EIR", and subject to the following conditions: Within 45 days of City Council approval, a revised Plan text, Final EIR, and Mitigatio~ Monitoring Plan incorporating the changes required shall be submitted to the Community Development Director for review and approval· Upon acceptance by the Co~mnxnity Development Director, a total of 25 unbound, 3-hole punch, copies of these documents shall be submitted for distribution to the City Council, the City Clerk, the Planning Commission, and staff. In addition, one unbound original copy each, and one executable copy each, on a 3.5 inch computer diskette in a format acceptable to City, shall be submitted. CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. SPECIFIC PLAN 93-01 - GENERAL DYNAMICS June 1, 1994 Page 3 2) 3) A copy of Planning Commission Resolution No 94-29 and this Ordinance shall be included within the Plan text after the title page. Utilities shall be undergrounded per Planning Commission Resolution No. 87-96 , with the following understanding: a) 4th Street - The golf course developer shall be responsible for undergrounding along the golf course frontage of 4th Street. Said undergrounding may be deferred until the development of Planning Areas V, VI, or VII, if secured by an in-lieu fee. b) 6th Street - The golf course developer shall be responsible for undergrounding utilities between Cleveland Avenue and the westerly boundary of Planning Area IX at the time of the golf course development. c) A- T. & S. F. Rail Line - Utilities shall be undergrounded with the golf course development. 4) The applicant shall prepare supplemental design guidelines to create a distinguishing character for the 380 acre project. The guidelines shall include unifying design concepts for entry statements, signage, and street furniture (e.g-, lighting standards, bollards, benches, etc.)- The guidelines shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Commission prior to the application for development of any planning area, except for the golf course. Pursuant to provisions of California Public Resources Code Section 21089(b), this application shall not be operative, vested or final, nor will building permits be issued or a map recorded, until (1) the Notice of Determination (NOD) regarding the associated environmental action is filed and posted with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Bernardino; and (2) any and all required filing fees assessed pursuant to California Fish and Game Code Section 711-4, together with any required handling charges, are paid to the County Clerk of the County of San Bernardino- In the event this application is determined exempt from such filing fees pursuant to the provisions of the California Fish and Game CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. SPECIFIC PLAN 93-01 - GENERAL DYNAMICS June I, 1994 Page 4 Code, or the guidelines promulgated thereunder, except for payment of any required handling charge for filing a Certificate of Fee Exemption, this condition shall be deemed null and void. The Mayor shall sign and the City Clerk shall certify as to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published within 15 days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE SUBAREA 18 SPECIFIC PLAN, AND ADOPTING THE STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS. A. Recitals. (i) There has been presented to this Council, in conjunction with this Council's consideration of the recommended adoption of the Subarea 18 Specific Plan, and related General Plan Amendment No. 93-02A, Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment No- 93-03, and Tentative Parcel Map 14647, a Final Environmental Impact Report. (ii) The Final Environmental Impact Report referred to in this Resolution consists of that document dated January 1994, entitled "Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Subarea 18 Specific Plan," together with the draft Final Environmental Impact Report dated April 1994, including written comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Report and written responses thereto submitted by staff of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and testimony presented during the hearings on the recomended adoption of the said Specific Plan insofar as that testimony pertained to the environmental matters, as well as the revised Executive Sun~nary, including revisions to mitigation measures, as well as the mitigation monitoring plan. Hereinafter, the above-referenced documents will be referred to as the "Final Environmental Impact Report." The entirety of the Final Environmental Impact Report is hereby incorporated in this Resolution by this reference. (iii) On January 26, February 23, and April 27, 1994, the Planning Connission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted duly noticed public hearings concerning environmental impacts of the proposed Subarea 18 Specific Plan and the companion amendments to the City's General Plan and Industrial Area Specific Plan (collectively, along with the approvals and actions described therein, the "project") and the adequacy of the Draft Environmental Impact Report for the project ("Draft EIR"). (iv) The public comment period on the Draft EIR was duly and lawfully closed on March 10, 1994, following due notice to the public and all applicable public agencies. (v) On June 1, 1194, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the Final Environmental Impact Report and concluded said hearing on that date. (vi) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. 337 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. FINAL EIR - GENERAL DYNAMICS June 1, 1994 Page 2 B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find, .determine, and resolve as follows: 1. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby take the following actions with respect to the Final Environmental Report: a. Certify that the Final Environmental Impact Report has been prepared on the Subarea 18 Specific Plan in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act, California Public Resources Code Sections 21000 et seq. ("CEQA") with State and City Guidelines for implementing CEQA and all other regulations promulgated with respect thereto, and with all other applicable laws and regulations thereunder. Further, that the Council certifies that it has considered the contents of the Final Environmental Impact Report in considering the adoption of the Subarea 18 Specific Plan, together with General Plan Amendment No. 93-02A, Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment No. 93-03, and Tentative Parcel Map 14647; b. Hereby adopt: (i) the Statement of Findings (EIR) attached hereto as Attachment A; (ii) the Statement of General Plan Consistency attached hereto as Attachment B; (iii) the Statement of Overriding Considerations, attached hereto as Attachment C; and (iv) the Mitigation Monitoring Program attached hereto as Attachment D, based on the following recommended findings: 1) The facts and findings set forth in the Statement of Findings (EIR), Statement of General Plan Consistency, and Statement of Overriding Considerations are supported by substantial evidence in the administrative record and the Final Environmental Impact Report. 2) The Final Environmental Impact Report has identified all significant environmental effects of the project; there are no known potentially significant environmental impacts not addressed in the Final Environmental Impact Report. 3) Although the Final Environmental Impact Report identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the project is approved, all significant effects that can feasibly be mitigated or avoided have been reduced to an acceptable level by the imposition of mitigation measures on the project. These mitigation measures are attached hereto as part of the Mitigation Monitoring Program and incorporated herein by this reference. 4) Potential mitigation measures or project alternatives not incorporated into the project (including the "no-project" alternative) were determined to be infeasible based upon the considerations set forth in the Statement of Findings (EIR) and the Final Environmental Impact Report and other substantial evidence in the administrative record. The cumulative impacts of the project in relation to other projects in the area have been considered, and, except with respect to those unavoidable impacts described in the Statement of Findings (EIR), mitigation measures are incorporated into the project to reduce such impacts to insignificant levels. CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. FINAL EIR - GENERAL DYNAMICS June 1, 1994 Page 3 5) The unavoidable significant impacts of the project that have not been reduced to a level of insignificance, as identified in the Statement of Findings (EIR) and the Final Environmental Impact Report, have been substantially reduced in their impacts by the imposition of mitigation measures. The remaining unavoidable significant impacts are outweighed by the economic, social, technological, legal, and other benefits of the project, as set forth in the Statement of Overriding Considerations. 6) The Final Environmental Impact Report has described a reasonable range of alternatives to the project (including the "project" alternative), even though these alternatives might impede the attainment of project objectives and might create other significant economic, social, legal, technological, or environmental impacts. A good faith effort was made to incorporate alternatives in the preparation of the Draft EIR, and reasonable alternatives were considered in the review process of the Final Environmental Impact Report and the ultimate decisions on the project. c. Pursuant to provisions of California Public Resources Code Section 21089 (b), this application shall not be operative, vested or final, nor will building permits be issued or a map recorded, until (1) the Notice of Determination (NOD) regarding the associated environmental action is filed and posted with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Bernardino; and (2) any and all required filing fees assessed pursuant to California Fish and Game Code Section 711.4, together with any required handling charges, are paid to the County Clerk of the County of San Bernardino. In the event this application is determined exempt from such filing fees pursuant to the provisions of the California Fish and Game Code, or the guidelines promulgated thereunder, except for payment of any required handling charge for filing a Certificate of Fee Exemption, this condition shall be deemed null and void. 2. The City Clerk to this Council shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution- 339 ATTACHMENT A STATEMENT OF FINDINGS AND FACTS (EIR) This Statement of Findings and Facts for the Sub- Area 18 Specific Plan Final Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") is divided into three sections. Section A sets forth the City's findings with respect to the environmental impacts of the Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan, the concurrent amendments to the City's General Plan and Industrial Area Specific Plan (IASP), and all other approvals and actions necessary to implement the foregoing as described therein (collectively, the "project"). This section has been further divided into ten subsections, addressing each of the areas of potential impact identified in the EIR. Section B sets forth the City's findings with respect to significant unavoidable adverse impacts, and has been divided into three subsections -- one for each area of potential unavoidable impact. Section C sets forth the City's findings with respect to alternatives to the proposed project, and has been divided into five subsections, one for each of the alternatives considered in the EIR. This Statement of Findings and Facts (EIR) is based upon the entire administrative record for the project, which is herebyincorporated by reference, and includes, without limitation, the EIR, the conditions of approval of the Sub- Area 18 Specific Plan, and testimony provided by members of the public, as well as comments by the Planning Commission and the City Council, during the hearings on the project before the Planning Cou~ission and the City Council. The findings contained herein and in the Statement of General Plan Consistency (Attachment B) and the Statement of Overriding Considerations (Attachment C) are not inclusive, but rather are intended to supplement the findings set forth in the attached Resolution. The statement of facts in support of the City's findings are also not inclusive, but rather are intended to identify'certain of the principal facts in the administrative record which support the findings contained herein. Additional facts in support of the City's findings may be found in the EIR, the conditions of approval of the Subarea 3 Specific Plan, the Mitigation Monitoring Program (Attachment D), the various staff reports prepared for both the Planning Co~,~Lission and the City Council, the minutes from the various public hearings on the project, and the administrative record as a whole. All references to "project design considerations" shall include, without limitation, the Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan, the 1880 [2575'7]1 - I - 13-APR-94 09:52:43 corresponding amendments to the City's General Plan and the IASP, and all conditions of approval of the Specific Plan. Effects Determined Not To Be Siqnificant or Mitigated to a Level of Insignificance. with respect to each of the ten areas in which potentially significant environmental effects could occur, the City finds, as provided below, that these potential impacts have been avoided or substantially lessened by virtue of project design considerations and the mitigation measures described in the EIR and the Mitigation Monitoring Program, each of which are hereby incorporated by reference. The following facts and conclusions reflected in the EIR and the administrative record support these findings: 1. Land Use. The current General Plan and IASP designations for the project site ("General Industrial" and "Industrial Park") have been amended to "Open Space" (with respect to the Golf Course) and "Mixed-Use" (with respect to the remainder of the project site). Development of the project site under these designations would include a broader mix of uses, particularly commercial, office, retail, and recreational uses, and greater development flexibility than is allowed under existing land use designations. The changes proposed are consistent with the general objectives and policies of the General Plan, as described further in the Statement of General Plan Consistency (attached hereto as Appendix B), and the expansion of uses, including the addition of commercial and recreational uses, would enhance the project's compatibility with the approved co~,~,~ercial uses in areas south of the project site. The project includes vacating and reclassifying portions of Cleveland Avenue. Cleveland Avenue is not considered a key roadway within the City circulation system due to its limited existing and planned access points. Conforming amendments to the General Plan and the IASP ensure consistency with the City's circulation system. No substantial traffic impacts will occur as a result of the street vacations contemplated by the project. The Project will have a significant unavoidable impact on the loss of agricultural lands. These impacts are discussed further in Section B below. 211880 [257~7]1 - 2 - 13-APR-94 09:52:43 2. Traffic and Circulation. A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) has been prepared for the project in accordance with the standards set forth in the San Bernardino County Congestion Management Plan (CMP). The TIA has been incorporated in the EIR and is consistent with and conforms to the requirements set forth in the CMP. Based upon maximum buildout of the project site at the full density permitted under the Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan, the project would generate approximately 64,600 vehicle trip ends and approximately 7,800 p.m peak hour trips. This level of traffic represents only an incremental increase over the traffic that would arise under a full build out pursuant to existing IASP land use designations. The project will incrementally exacerbate potentially deficient levels of service at a number of intersections within and outside the City, and will also contribute to potential level of service deficiencies at two additional intersections, Haven Avenue/Fourth Street and 1- 15 southbound ramps/Fourth Street. However, roadway improvements sufficient to maintain acceptable levels of service are identified in the EIR and mitigation measures have been incorporated to require fair share contributions to offset the project's impacts to both the City circulation system and offsite intersections and interchanges. Because the project will contribute to cumulative impacts to the regional circulation system, resulting in reductions of levels of service, these impacts have been identified as significant and unavoidable and are discussed further below. 3. Noj se. The project may result in temporary short-term construction noise impacts. Mitigation measures have been incorporated to reduce the noise generated from construction activity. Given the distance between the project site and the nearest residential area, the residual noise impacts remaining after mitigation are not considered significant. The cumulative vehicular traffic, rail, and stationary source noise adjacent to Sixth Street has the potential of resulting in significant noise impacts on outdoor golf course areas that are used on an ongoing basis (i.e., eating areas) in conjunction with structures located on the golf course (i.e., the club house). To the extent these outdoor activity areas are impacted beyond the 70 dBA 211880 [2575711 - 3 - 13-APR-94 09:52:44 Ldn, mitigation measures are identified to reduce noise to levels deemed acceptable under the General Plan. 4. Air Ouality. The grading and construction activities associated with the development of the project site will result in emissions of C0, N0x, PM10, and ROC which exceed the threshholds of significance established by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). Numerous mitigation measures have been identified to reduce construction related emissions to the extent feasible; however, insofar as construction-related emissions still exceed SCAQMD thresholds for CO, NOx, and ROC, they are identified as significant and unavoidable. These impacts are discussed further in Section B below. Project operational emissions, due principally to emissions from vehicle trips, would be comparable to those produced under current IASP designations. The project's incremental increase in regional emissions would only exceed the SCAQMD thresholds for CO. However, according to the Environmental Impact Report prepared for the 1991 Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP), which is incorporated in the EIR, regional emissions of CO will meet Federal and State ambient air quality standards by the target year 2010 after application of identified mitigation measures on a regionwidebasis. Air modeling results indicate that the project will not produce local CO concentrations in excess of State and Federal standards. The project is in conformity with the 1991 AQMP. It will contribute to the attainment of subregional job/housing performance targets and will implement regional growth management objectives and reduce vehicle miles traveled (VMT) and vehicle trips (VT) through the application of transportation demand management strategies. Mitigation measures have been incorporated which reduce VMT and VT to the greatest extent feasible. 5. So~ ] s and Geology. The project site is not located in the vicinity of known active or inactive faults, and the potential for seismic or geologic related impacts is not considered significant. The potential for subsidence and differential compaction will be addressed through mitigation requiring subsurface geotechnical investigations prior to issuance of grading permits. 2118~0 [2575711 - 4 - 13-APR-94 09:]2:45 6. Hydro!ogy, Drainage, and Water Ouality. Due to the proposed Golf Course, development of the project site would result in approximately 40% less impervious surface than under the existing IASP designations. Storm drain improvements will be installed as development progresses to convey the post-development on- site stormflows into the existing storm drain facilities adjacent to the site. Identified mitigation measures require compliance with applicable storm water quality requirements. 7. Biological Resources. A biological survey of the site, including focused surveys for the Delhi Sands Flower Loving Fly, San Diego Horned Lizard and Orange-Throated Whiptail, were conducted and indicate that no significant habitat will be impacted by development of the project. The project site has been substantially disturbed from decades of agricultural activities, uses of the existing building parcels, and grading associated with previous subdivision activities. Although further development will result in an incremental addition to the on-going regional conversion of open space to urban uses and related loss of foraging/nesting opportunities for human-tolerant species, this loss is likely to be less than that associated with the current IASP (due to the presence of the Golf Course), was contemplated in the General Plan and IASP as a product of the conversion of agricultural lands, and is not considered significant due to the site's isolation from other large natural open-space areas by existing urban development. 8. Public Service~ ana Utilities. Although the project would incrementally increase the level of water consumed and wastewater generated, the impacts of the project would be less than those under existing IASP designations, and the Cucamonga County Water District has adequate capacity to provide water and accept wastewater discharges. Appropriate water conservation measures have been incorporated. The project would increase the generation of solid waste, but adequate facilities would be available to accept this waste, and the inclusion of source reduction and recycling mitigation ensures that no significant impact will OCCUr. Because the project will help address an existing jobs/housing imbalance in the region, it may not have any 211880 12575711 - 5 - 13-APR-94 09:52:46 readily identifiable effect on schools. To the extent the project has indirect, incremental impacts on schools, these impacts will be mitigated to a level of insignificance through payment of school mitigation fees and participation in the tax increment pass through arising as a result of the project's location within the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Plan area. 9. Energy Demand and Conservation. The project will result in less electrical and natural gas demands than that which would arise under existing IASP designations. Existing and planned utility facilities are available to adequately serve the planned growth within the district, and mitigation has been incorporated to require appropriate conversation measures. 10. Hazardous Materials. Development of the project site may introduce industrial land uses that could generate hazardous materials; however, due to the overall reduction in hazardous material-related uses compared to the current IASP, the proposed project would likely have a beneficial impact in reducing hazardous material-related risks. Residual impacts of historic pesticide use are not considered a significant constraint on development. Any health risks associated with potential asbestos-containing materials in the existing buildings will be addressed by compliance with applicable SCAQMD notification and removal requirements. B. Significant Unavoidable Impacts. The EIR identified three areas in which potentially significant impacts would remain after mitigation. With respect to each of these impacts, the City finds that changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which substantially lessen the significant environmental effects identified. Additional mitigation of cumulative regional impacts is within the responsibility and jurisdiction of other public agencies, and not the City. With respect to any remaining impacts within the City's jurisdiction, specific economic, social, environmental, legal, and technological considerations make infeasible additional mitigation measures. The following facts and conclusions reflected in the EIR and the administrative record support these findings: 211880 12575711 - 6 - 13-APR-94 09:52:47 1. The Loss of Agricultural Lands. The loss of agricultural lands within the project site was anticipated and accepted in the City's General Plan and the IASP. The project would not result in any new impacts from the development contemplated in the IASP. The loss of open space values associated with the conversion from agricultural use has been mitigated by the inclusion of the Golf Course, which will constitute the largest contiguous open space area within the IASP district. 2. Cumulative Traffic. As noted in Section A.2, the project will contribute to cumulative impacts to the regional circulation system, resulting in reductions of levels of service. The EIR identifies regional circulation improvements which, when constructed, would preserve CMP levels of service (i.e., LOS E). With respect to those improvements located within the City, a mitigation measure requires the project proponent to contribute its fair share to the necessary improvements, through payment of the City's Transportation Development Fee. With respect to improvements outside of the City, a mitigation measure requires participation, on a fair-share basis, in a regionally-adopted mitigation fee program. Further mitigation of cumulative regional impacts is beyond the control of the City or the applicant. The residual project traffic impacts are considered an incremental change from those that would arise under the IASP. 3. Air Ouality. As noted in Section A.4, air emissions from certain phases of construction and operation of the project are anticipated to exceed SCAQMD thresholds of significance. Mitigation measures designed to reduce the level of construction and vehicle emissions have been incorporated to the extent feasible. Upon implementation of the mitigation measures identified in the EIR, no local exceedances of Carbon Monoxide will occur, and the application of mitigation measures set forth in the 1991 AQMP on a region- wide basis will mean that the project will not contribute to any violations of Federal and State standards. The project is in conformity with the policies and goals of the 1989 Growth Management Plan and the 1991 AQMP. Any remaining cumulative impacts are beyond the jurisdiction and control of the applicant or the City to mitigate further. 211810 [257~7ll - 7 - 13-APR-9,4 09:~2:47 C. Project Alternatives. The EIR identifies a total of five alternatives to the proposed project. The City finds that the range of alternatives discussed in the EIR is reasonable. With respect to each of the alternatives identified, the City finds that: (i) such alternatives cannot feasibly attain the basic objectives of the project; (ii) specific economic, social, environmental, legal, or technological considerations make the proposed alternatives infeasible; and (iii) these same factors are overriding considerations which warrant rejection of the alternatives in favor of the proposed project. The following facts and conclusions reflected in the EIR and the administrative record support these findings: 1. No-Project/No Development Alternative. Although this alternative could reduce the potential for significant unavoidable local impacts in the three areas were project mitigation would not be fully effective in doing so -- loss of agricultural lands, cumulative traffic impacts, and exceedances of SCAQMD emission thresholds -- the benefits produced by retention of the project site in its existing undeveloped state are considered minimal, and, as described further in the Statement of Overriding Considerations incorporated herein, are outweighed by more compelling and substantial social, economic, and legal considerations. The project-specific impacts cited in the EIR as "unavoidable" all reflected a cumulative diminution or exacerbation of regional resources. These impacts would not be fully addressed even under the no project alternative. The substantial loss of agricultural lands acknowledged and accepted at the time the City adopted its General Plan would occur with or without development on the proposed project site. The failure to develop the project site would merely shift absorption of commercial and industrial uses, and associated traffic generation, to other properties either within or outside the City, and perhaps do so in a manner less compatible with the growth management objectives of the 1991 AQMP and the 1989 Growth Management Plan. For the same reason, the reduction of air pollutant emissions would not be expected to have any material impact on the regional emission inventory (and the project's local air quality impacts have already been mitigated to a level of insignificance). 211880 [25757]1 - 8 - 13-APR-94 09:52:48 347 Conversely, preservation of the project site in an undeveloped state would be expected to have substantial socio-economic and legal repercussions. This alternative would perpetuate existing uneconomic agricultural activities in direct contravention to the goals and objectives stated in the City's General Plan and the IASP. Assuming such preservation is accompanied by a down-zoning of the project site, the project applicant would undoubtedly raise legal concerns about the deprivation of economically beneficial uses of the project site. More generally, the project site comprises a substantial percentage of the remaining undeveloped portion of the IASP area and would, if left undeveloped, deprive the City of thousands of jobs and millions of dollars in tax revenue, including tax increment to be used by the City's Redevelopment Agency to achieve the important redevelopment objectives set forth in the City's Redevelopment Plan. Because this alternative could not reasonably attain any of the basic objectives of the project, which contemplate improving planning flexibility so as to facilitate development and better promote the job and revenue-generating objectives of the General Plan, it is considered infeasible. 2. Development Under Current I~P Designations. On the whole, this alternative would have substantially the same environmental impacts as the proposed project. The impacts from this alternative were analyzed in the EIR based upon assumed development at a level less than the "worst case" build-out assumptions used in assessing impacts from the proposed project. In this respect, a comparison of the proposed project with the current IASP likely overstates the actual differences between the two. In some areas, most notably biological resources, energy consumption, and public facilities, the proposed project is likely to produce incrementally fewer impacts than this alternative due to the presence of the Golf Course and the de-emphasis of industrial uses. To the extent this alternative would produce any substantial environmental benefits over the proposed project, the substantial social and economic benefits noted below, which are described further in the Statement of Overriding Considerations incorporated herein, substantially outweigh these benefits. With respect to the feasibility of this alternative, changing market conditions have led to the reevaluation of the type of zoning within the project site that would best achieve some of the principal objectives 211880 [2~757]1 - 9 - 13-APR-94 09:.~2:49 identified in the General Plan and the Redevelopment Plan: (i) encouraging opportunities to mix different, but compatible land uses and activities; (ii) providing recreational, cultural, and employment opportunities to meet the needs of the community; (iii} coordinating industrial development to encourage an integrated industrial area with maximum flexibility and access to the regional circulation network; (iv) promoting land use patterns that encourage non-mozorized modes of transportation; and (v) organizing land uses to promote maximal opportunity for transit usage. While the existing IASP designations could, in theory, have achieved these objectives (at least in part), changes in market conditions due to a glut of industrial warehouse space and increased competition, along with substantial constraints arising as a result of the project's location in three separate subareas within the IASP, greatly diminished the prospects for attracting end-users and thereby impaired the development potential of the site. The introduction of the Golf Course, along with (i) a more coordinated integration of uses between planning areas, (ii) more advantageous use of the rail lines to the north (chiefly in conjunction with a proposed Metrolink Station) and the major roadway arterials adjacent to the site (Milliken, Fourth Street, and Sixth Street), and (iii) a more flexible mix of uses with greater emphasis on commercial, office, retail, and recreational uses, are all features of the proposed project which improve the project site's ability to achieve the above-stated goals. The IASP alternative would not be likely to achieve these goals within any forseeable time period. Buildincs. IA~P With Re-Use of Existing On-Site This alternative would have substantially similar environmental, social, and economic impacts and benefits as the second alternative analyzed above. Due to the more intense development associated with the re-use of the existing building parcels, environmental impacts of this alternative would be greater than those associates with Alternative 2. For the same reasons noted above, it is questionable whether this alternative would be environmentally superior to the proposed project. Although this proposed alternative would improve the marketability and development potential of the 75 acre existing building parcels, it would not alter the IASP land use designations for the reminder of the project site and would, therefore, suffer from the same constraints discussed in Section C.2 above. Thus, for the same reasons noted 211880 [2575711 - 10 - 13-APR-94 09:52:R} 349 above, this alternative could not reasonably attain the principal objectives of the project within reasonably foreseeable time periods. Additionally, to the extent that any minimal environmental benefits exist under this alternative, they are substantially outweighed by the socio- economic factors identified earlier. 4. Residential Development Alternative. Under this alternative, the project site would be primarily developed with residential dwelling units surrounding an 18 hole public golf course. The introduction of such a substantial number of dwelling units (over 2,500) over such a substantial portion of the remaining industrial lands within the City could result in significant incompatibilities with on-site and surrounding land uses and would represent a significant departure from the land use objectives currently identified in the General Plan, the IASP, and the Redevelopment Plan. Although this alternative would result in fewer vehicles trips, and would potentially reduce the level of air emissions, noise, and energy consumption, the substantial incompatibilities resulting from the introduction of so many sensitive receptors to an area already developed with industrial uses would offset any perceived environmental benefits of this alternative and render it environmentally inferior to the proposed project. To the extent that any environmental benefits accrue under this alternative, such benefits would be substantially outweighed by the socio-economic factors described in the Statement of Overriding Considerations. Additionally, because this alternative would not achieve the job-generating objectives identified by the City, it is considered "infeasible.- 5. ~lternat4ve S~te. As described more fully in the EIR, the ability to select an alternative site for implementation of the type of golf course-oriented multi-use project contemplated by the City would be significantly constrained by the reining area available for industrial development and by the amount of contiguous acreage necessary to implement these objectives. The largest piece of undeveloped land in the IA~P encompasses only approximately 160 acres, and would be barely adequate enough to construct an 18 hole golf course. Other sites within the City would either be too small or would require substantial zoning and General Plan amendments to preserve land use consistency. For these and other reasons, an alternative site for the project could not 211880 123757]i - 11 - 13-APR-gl reasonably achieve the project's objectives, and are therefore considered infeasible. 211~180 125757]1 - 12 - 13-APR-94 09:52:51 3.51 ATTACI{MENT B STATEMENT OF GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY This Attachment assesses how the Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan and the proposed amendment to the Industrial Area Specific Plan and General Plan (the "project") furthers the objectives and policies of the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and whether the project will obstruct the attainment of these objectives and policies. Rather than attempt to analyze each individual objective, policy, or program set forth in the General Plan -- a process which would detract from understanding how the Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan relates to the Industrial Area Specific Plan and the General Plan as a whole -- the relationship between the Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan is discussed within the context of each of the principal components comprising the General Plan -- Land Use and Development, Environmental Resources, and Public Health and Safety -- with more detailed discussion reserved for those specific policies and objectives that are particularly germane to assessing the changes proposed relative to the current Industrial Area Specific Plan (IASP) and General Plan land use designations. A. Land Use and Development. 1. General Land Use Objectives. The General Plan identifies a number of key land use objectives that "are aimed at creating a City that functions efficiently, is exciting to leave in, and makes the best use of its various resources." A number of these objectives have been incorporated as principal objectives of the Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan, including: (i) encourage opportunities to mix different, but compatible land uses and activities; (ii) provide recreational, cultural, and employment opportunities to meet the needs of the community;(iii) coordinate industrial development to encourage an integrated industrial area with maximum flexibility and access to the regional circulation network; (iv) promote land use patterns that encourage non-motorized modes of transportation; and (v) organize land uses to promote maximal opportunity for transit usage. The project promotes these important objectives by establishing a more flexible, better integrated array of proposed land uses within the context of a Specific Plan. The expanded variety and mixture of uses established under the Sub-Area Specific Plan, in conjunction with changes in market demand and increased cou~,,ercial development on the southern edge of the IASP, are expected to promote the land ~1A569 [Z57~ 1 - 1 - 13-APR-94 09:50:23 use objectives identified in the General Plan, including those enumerated above. 2. General Land Use Policies. a. Industrial. The General Plan currently establishes three categories of industrial land uses: Industrial Park, General Industrial, and Heavy Industrial. The General Plan specifically reflects that the policies relating to industrial uses are "elaborated in the City's Industrial Area Specific Plan which outlines a much more detailed development program for this area." The General Plan describes "Industrial Park" uses as "planned grouped concentrations of industrial and research and development offices," which are "typically labor intensive, meaning that the number of employees per acre is high. The General Plan contemplates that these uses will be organized along major thoroughfares, including 4th Street, and "along the periphery of the industrial area and with convenient access to public transit." That portion of the project site currently located within IASP Sub-Area 12 is designated as Industrial Park under both the IASP and the General Plan. The IASP currently permits a variety of commercial uses within this Sub-Area, including professional/design services, administrative and office, research services, business support services, financial, insurance and real estate services, hotel, co,~tLercial and recreation facilities, including a golf course. The General Plan describes "General Industrial" land use as permitting a wide range of industrial activities including heavy commercial, and office uses. The General Plan states that "this land use is appropriate as a buffer between non-industrial uses and heavy industrial uses." That portion of the project site within current Sub-Areas 10 and 11 are designated "General Industrial" under the IASP and the General Plan. The IASP permits, or conditionally permits, office professional, design and research, indoor wholesale/retail commercial, and recreational facilities within this zone. Although all of the industrial uses and many of the co:t~.ercial uses proposed under the Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan are permitted or conditionally permitted under the current IASP Industrial Park, and General Industrial designations, one of the express objectives of this project is to eliminate what are perceived as artificial and arbitrary divisions between the three existing Sub-Areas (for example, Z1A569 [Z5757] I - 2 - 13-APR-94 09:50:24 a number of uses which may be permitted in Sub-Area 12 may be prohibited or only conditionally permitted in Sub-Area 10 or 11). Specifically, by expanding the variety of commercial and recreational uses contemplated within the project site, the Property Owner intends to inject more creative and imaginative employment-generating designs and to help better integrate this portion of the southern boundary of the IASP with anticipated regional market trends. As a result, the Property Owner is proposing an amendment to the IASP ("IASP Amendment") to specifically incorporate the Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan and to concurrently amend the General Plan to reflect the IASP Amendment. While an amendment to the General Plan to reflect the IASP Amendment and the adoption of the Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan would, alone, appear to ensure consistency, it was also felt that the three categories of industrial use currently identified in the General Plan, while specifically acknowledging the need to provide for labor intensive office and commercial uses and non-industrial transitions within the industrial category could be construed narrowly, and thereby discourage the General Plan objectives (noted above) to promote planning flexibility and the mixture of different, but compatible land uses. As a result, the Property Owner has proposed an additional amendment to the General Plan to add a new category of land use entitled "Mixed-Use." The Mixed-Use category permits a wide range of a commercial and industrial activities including, medium, light, and custom manufacturing, research and development, office, recreation, mixed-use commercial, retail, and general commercial. Because the proposed uses within the areas designated Mixed-Use under the Sub-Area Specific Plan will also be designated Mixed-Use under the General Plan Amendment, consistency will be ensured. b. Open Space. The General Plan provides that open space areas must be maintained "in order to protect valuable natural resources, and to prevent development in areas considered unsafe because of environmental constraints". The General Plan contains a variety of "written and mapped policies to ensure that the resources are managed so that posterity can enjoy them." The IASP currently does not contain any open space district designations, although the IASP does permit, or conditionally permit, golf course uses within each of the three Sub-Areas currently comprising the project site. 21z, 569 [Z57~73 1 - 3 - 13-APR-94 09:50:25 Although the applicant's proposed amendment to the General Plan to reflect the IASP Amendment and the adoption of the Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan would itself ensure consistency with the General Plan's policies relating to open space, the City has requested that instead of designating the Golf Course "Mixed-Use" along with the' remainder of the Sub-Area 18, that this portion of the site be designated "Open Space" Because the current description of open space uses within the General Plan may be construed to refer specifically to the conservation of natural resources, an additional amendment to the definition of "Open Space" has been proposed to clarify that the Open Space designation may also include man-made open spaces, including golf course uses, within designated areas adjacent to residential, commercial, or industrial uses. The clarifying amendment will ensure project consistency with the General Plan. 3. Circulation. The General Plan establishes a circulation system for the City as a whole and the IASP area. The Circulation Plan established under the Sub-Area Specific Plan preserves this circulation system in all principal respects. However, the proposed vacation of a portion of Cleveland Avenue south of 6th Street and the redesignation of Cleveland north of 6th Street from a secondary arterial with an 88-foot right-of-way to a 66-foot local industrial collector, does require a corresponding amendment to the General Plan Circulation Plan. Because the project EIR indicates that no traffic impacts will occur as a result of the vacation and redesignation of Cleveland, the conforming General Plan amendment will ensure consistency with the policies and objectives of the General Plan. 4. Public Facilities. The General Plan contains a variety of objectives and policies designed to ensure that adequate public facilities and services will be maintained as the City develops. The proposed project is not expected to have any substantial intoact on the City's Parks and Recreational Plan, or on schools. The establishment of a golf course as a central feature of the Specific Plan will promote a number of General Plan policies concerning the encouragement of recreational uses. 5. Community Design. The primary design goals identified in the General Plan are to promote the functional efficiency of the 21&569 [Z57~7"] 1 - 4 - 13-APR-94 09:50:26 City, improve the City's image and appearance and to use development to express community character. The Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan promotes these primary objectives and the more detailed community design elements set forth in the General Plan by providing a unifying character to the project site through the adoption of a Specific Plan which incorporates a variety of land uses around a central golf course feature. Consistency is further ensured through the retention of existing City policies relating to performance standards, site development criteria, subdivision, master planning, and development and design review. Additionally, preservation of the principal features of the City Circulation Plan ensures that the objectives associated with maintaining travel routes will be promoted. The incorporation of project design features adjacent to the proposed Metrolink station further promotes these objectives. B. Environmental Resources. 1. Land Resources. This section of the General Plan contains a number of objectives and policies designed to promote proper soil management techniques and to prevent the premature elimination of agricultural land whenever feasible. The Sub-Area Specific Plan will not change the impact of development on the existing grape vineyard uses on the site. The loss of this agricultural use was previously acknowledged as inevitable when the IASP was first adopted. By requiring subsequent development to comply with applicable City policies and procedures concerning soil management and grading activities, the Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan ensures compliance with the General Plan land resource objectives and policies. 2. Water Resources. The General Plan contains several objectives and policies designed to protect and enhance water resources. Compliance with applicable City policies and procedures as a condition to subdivision and Design Review approval ensure compliance with these policies and objectives. The EIR for the Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan concludes that no significant impacts to water resources will occur. 3. Open Space. The conforming amendments to the General Plan ensure consistency with the General Plan's policies and objectives concerning the preservation of open space. The 21&569 [;'575?]1 - 5 - 13-APR-94 09:50:27 356 establishment of a golf course will result in an increase in open space areas within the project site. 4. Enercy. The General Plan identifies the objective of encouraging more efficient use of energy resources. The project EIR incorporates a number of mitigation measures specifically intended to promote this objective. Compliance with applicable City policies and regulations as a condition to subdivisions and Design Review approvals further ensures consistency with the General Plan's energy objectives and policies. C. Public Health and Safety. The General Plan sets forth a broad number of objectives and policies designed to ensure that subsequent development within the City will be sensitive to geologic, seismic, flood, fire, noise, air quality, crime, and emergency service concerns and hazards. The Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan preserves development and regulatory procedures from the IASP and the City Development Code as a means to mitigate potential impacts in each of the areas identified in the General Plan. Additionally, each of these areas are explored in more detail in the project EIR, which indicates that the changes from the current designations under the IASP will'not result in any substantial additional impacts to the environment. Although the EIR indicates that development of the project site (under either the proposed Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan or the current IASP designations) will result in new sources of construction and operational air emissions, the Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan contemplates the adoption of a transportation demand management strategy consistent with the policies identified in the General Plan. In particular, the location of industrial and cou~Lercial uses in proximity to the proposed Metrolink station provides a mechanism to ensure that non-motorized transportation policies will be achieved. The incorporation of numerous mitigation measures dealing with the suppression of particulars emissions and the promotion of energy conservation further ensures consistency with the General Plan air quality objectives and policies. 21/.569 [ZS~?~ ~ - 6 - 13-APR-94 09:50:27 357 ATTACHMENT C STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS The City of Rancho Cucamonga proposes to approve the proposed Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan and related amendments to the General Plan and Industrial Area Specific Plan (along with the other actions and approvals described therein, the "project"). A Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) has been prepared for the project, and certain project-related environmental impacts have been identified which cannot be completely avoided through mitigation: i.e., the loss of agricultural lands, cumulative traffic impacts, and exceedances of SCAQMD air quality emission thresholds. Based upon the EIR and other information in the administrative record, the following overriding considerations are provided against which these unavoidable adverse effects are balanced in reaching a decision on this project. On balance, the remaining unavoidable adverse effects are found acceptable given the overriding considerations contained herein. will: The City finds that implementation of the project 1. Help implement a number of key objectives in the General Plan by encouraging an integrated industrial area with maximum flexibility and access to the regional circulation network, promoting land use patterns that encourage non-motorized modes of transportation, and organizing land uses to promote maximum opportunity for job creation and transit usage. 2. Improve the City's fiscal balance, thereby enabling the City to provide and enhance public services and facilities. 3. Help implement the City Redevelopment Plan by substantially improving the development potential of the project site, integrating such development in a highly- amenitized setting which includes an 18-hole public golf course, and improving the potential to generate tax increment revenues which may be used to achieve other important objectives of the Plan. 4. Help improve the overall quality of life within the community by promoting a more dynamic mix of recreational, cultural, and employment opportunities. 214550 [25757] 1 -1- 13-APR-94 10:50:58 5. Substantially increase the amount cf open space within the City's industrial area by introducing an 18-hole public golf course. 6. Assist in achieving a major local and regional planning goal by providing jobs within a jobs-poor subregion. The City also finds on the basis of the EIR and other information in the record referenced in Attachments A and B to the accompanying Resolution (which are hereby incorporated by reference), that additional mitigation measures or alternatives which might further reduce or eliminate the significant impacts of the project cannot be feasibly accomplished in a successful manner considering the various economic, environmental, social, legal and technological factors involved. In this regard, any unavoidable impacts which would result from project implementation are principally a product of cumulative and regional growth trends, would occur under implementation of the current IASP land use designations, and would be unlikely to be avoided in the long term even if no further development on the project site occurred. This factor is an additional consideration in weighing the substantial benefits outlined above and provides an additional basis for concluding that the project's unavoidable impacts are overriden by the significant benefits offered by the project. 214550 [25757] 1 -2- 13-APR-94 10:50:58 ATTACHMENT D DRAFt MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM FOR THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA IASP SUB-AREA 18 SPECIFIC PLAN EIR State Clearinghouse Number 93102055 Submitted to: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Departmere 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucarnonga, California 91730 Contact: Dan Coleman, Principal Planner Prepared by: Michael Brandman Associates Carnegie Centre 2530 Red Hill Avenue Santa Ana, California 92705 Contact: Thomas E. Smith, AICP, Project Director Michael E. Houlihan, Project Manager May 4, 1994 360 1.0 2.0 TABLe. OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ..................... PROGRAM MANAGEMENT ............................. 1 2.1 Roles and Responsibilities ........................... 2.2 GeneralProcedures ............................... 2 Attachment A Sample Reporting and Implementation Form 361 1.0 PqTRODUCTION Section 21081.6 to the Public Resources Code requires a lead or responsible agency that approves or carries out a project where an environmental impact report has identified significant environmental effects w adopt a *reporting or moniwring program for adopted or required changes to mitigate or avoid significant environmental effects. * The City of Rancho Cucamonga is the lead agency for the Rancho Cucamonga IASP Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan EIR. A draf~ environmental impact report has been prepared for this project and addressed potential environmental impacts and, where appropriate, recommended measures to mitigate these impacts. As such, a mitigation reponlng or moniwring program is required to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented. The pwject is located at the southern boundary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and is within the existing Industrial Area Specific Plan (]ASP). The project site is bounded by Fourth Street to the south, on the east by Mi!liken Avenue, on the north by the AT&SF railroad, and on the west by Utica Street and Cleveland Avenue. The proposed Sub-Area Specific Plan would include a broad mix of uses that could include a botel/conference center, retail, restaurant, and entertainment, as well as office, research and development, and light industrial uses centering around an 18-hole golf course. 2.0 PROGILIM MANAGEMENT The mitigation monitoring plan (MMP) for the Rancho Cucamonga IASP Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan EIR will be in place through all phases of project approval. Enforcement of the MMP will be the responsibility of a Projet Manager (I'M). AND RF. SPONSIBn.rrlF.& PROJECT MANAGER The PM is usigned by the Community Development Depki~ent Director. The PM assigned to the proposed projet will supervise the MMP through all phases of projet approval and is responsible for the overall management of the MMP. The mitigation measures identified in the MMP fall inw two categories: 1. Measures that __need__ to be satisfied prior to the iuuance of building permits, and 2. Measures that are implemented with subsequent levels of development through conditions of approval. The PM is thowughly familiar with the projet and qualified to determine if an adopted measure is being properly implemented. The PM oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting and Implementation (R&I) Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is being taken on each measure. The PM and/or an assignee will also be responsible for the filing and updating of the R&I Forms during all phases of the projet. The PM will determine the need__ for a measure to JB/I~'~(J~I .MMP 362 be modified and ensure the use of a mitigation specialist if technical expertise beyond the PM's is required. If it is found that an adopted mitigation measure is not being properly implemented, the PM would require corrective actions to ensure adequate implementation. The responsibilities of the PM include the following: An MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potential significant impact and its corresponding mitigation identified in the list of mitigation measures artached hereto. Appropriam specialists will be retained, as needed, to monitor specific mitigation s,'tivities and provide appropriam writran approvals to the PM. The PM and/or an assignee will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the PM and/or an assignee at the betram of the MMP Reporting Form. Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The PM is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the PM and/or an assignee. The completed form will be provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel. The PM has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after written notification has been issued. The PM also has authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring. The PM also has authority to hold the issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. ~ Prod-am flefipidols The MMP consists of key program elements. The definitions of these elements are summarized below. iVeVwP Files Files are established to docunmm and retain records of the MMP. The file organization is established by the PM according to mitigation measures and project phases. R&I Forms R&I Forms axe designed to record the monitoring activity in a consistent manner with appropriate approvals. The R&I Form is placed in the MMP files. A suggested copy of the form is in this program description as Attachment A. Environmental Compliance Verification At the completion of construction contracts that are part of the overall development of the project, a verification of environmental compliance is executed by the PM. The verification concludes the construction monitoring process for the contract. Mitigation Monitoring Program Procedures The policies and procedures for the MMP described herein are intended to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines for monitoring the implementation of the mitigation measures discussed in the draft EIR. Table I lists each mitigation measure and the implementor, the responsible party for monitoring, and the timing of implementation for each mitigation measure for the proposed project. Table I also provides the PM a verification of compliance for each mitigation measure during each applicable phase of the project. An R&I form (see Attachment A) is prepared for each potential significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure. After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase. The PM shall initial and date the measure on Table 1. A Program EIR has been prepared and certified for the Rancho Cucamonga Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan, within the meaning of 14 California Administrative Code Section 15168, and is intended to analyze and cover the project as a whole. Each discretionary project application within the Sub-Area Specific Plan area will need to include any and all initial studies and assessments required by CEQA. To the extent permitted by CEQA, no further environmental assessment beyond the Program EIR is considered necessary. In the event CEQA requires any additional environmental review, the City may impose additional measures (or conditions) to mitigate adverse impacts which were not considered at the time the Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan was approved, and which are otherwise consistent with the provisions of any development agreement between the City and the property owner. Disposition of Monitorinf Forms All active and completed R&I Forms are kept in the MMP file with the City of Rancho Cucamonga during the pre-design, design, construction, and operational phases of the project. Reports will be available from the city upon request at the following address: City of Rancho Cucamonga (Lead Agency) Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 TABLE 1 MITIGATION MONITORING MATRIX General Dynamics - Rancho Cucamonga Sub-Area Specific Plan - Mitigation Monitoring Program Verification of Compliance Responsible for Mitigation Implementor Monitoring' Timing Signature Inventory of Mitigation Measures In lie colunum to lie right are listed personnel/agencies responsible for implementation for monitoring, timing, and compliance. Mitigation measures are listed by topical area. Land Use and Planning No feasible measures are available to mitigate lie removal of active grape vineyards from lie project site. No olier mitigation measures ue required. Traffic and Circulation Asmming that potential t~affic impacts occur as projected in the traffic impact analysis, development within the proposed Sub-Area Specific Plan ihall complete all frontage improvements to ultimate geomeuics, as outlined in lie City's General Plan and in accordance with lie Development Agreement, including all intersection turning lanes. In addition, development shall conUi- bute · traffic foe in accordance will lie City's adopted traffic impact foe program (Transportation Development Impact Foe Ordinance No. 445) u the project's connibution to citywide N/A N/A N/A N/A Project Ai,plicm City Engineer Prior to issuance of building permits Date N/A Footnotes are printed on page 21. J' ~001 .MMP TABLE I (cominued) General Dynamics - Rancho Cucamonga Sub-Area Specific Plan - Mitigation Monitoring Program Mitigation circulation improvemona identified u ncccsury at the time of issuance of building permits. These improvements may consist of/e improvements described in Section 5.2.3 in the draft EIR. In she evem the tripa generated from buildout of the project equal or exceed those projected in the Iraflic impact analysis and · regional ~aflic impact fee has been established to allocate, on a fair share buis, the cosIs of new regional improvements necessary to acconunod-_,__-- regional ~afiic growth, at the time of building permit issuance, the building permit applicant shall be required to pay its fair share of such regional improvemere in accordance with the adopted regional fee. Noise Consreaction activity shall be limi~,d to 6:30 a.m. to 8 p.m. Monday through Saturday, unless a permit for each work area ham first been iuued by the Director of Public Works, or no noise- sensitive receptors would be exposed to the construction noise. ReSponsible for Implementor Monitoring' Timing Project Applicant City Engineer Prior to issuance of building permits Project Applicm~/ City Planner Concurrent wilh Grading Permit issuance of grading Condition permits Verification of Compliance Signature Date Footnotes are printed on page 21. TABLE I (continued) General Dynamics - Rancho Cucamonga Sub-Area Specific Plan - Mitigation Monitoring Program Mitigation Mufileru on constmclion equipment and uucks shall meet the manufacmrer's recommended specificntions for open- tion and maintenance. Development of the project site shall be in conformance with she Perfornumce Standards idsntitied m the propoacd Sub-Area Speci6c Plan. Fixed ongoing outdoor activity ateu~ (i.e., eating ateu) associated wi~h mucmres on the golf course (i.e., golf course clubhouse) shall be placed in ateas with noise levels that do not exceed 70 dBA Ldn from combined mobile sources (vehicular and rail Uafiic) and stationary sources (commer- cinl and industrial activities) unless such outdoor ateu ate shielded from form with applicable City requirements. In addilion, the clubhouse and any additional suucmres m be located widdn the golf course shall be placed in areas with noise levels that do not exceed 65 dBA Ldn from combined mobile and stationary sources unless noise insulation tealurea are included in the design to meet applicable City and Responsible for Implementor Monitoring' Timing Project Applicant/ City Planner Concurrent with Grading Permit issue of grading Condition permits Project Al~licant City Planner Project Applicant City Planner Prior to approval of development plans Prior to approval of development plans Verification of Compliance Signature Date Footnotes are printed on page 2 I. Ir ~j0O0i .MMP TABLE I (continued) General Dynamics - Rancho Cucamonga Sub-Area Specific Plan - Mitigation Monitoring Program Mitigation State ~mndardm. Conventional con- taction with windows closed and fresh air supply ~tmm or air conditioning will normally m~et a~eae standards. if the clubhouse or any additional mruc- tures to be located within ths golf course are placed in an area with noise Icveb excceding 70 dBA Ldn, · d~- tailed analysis of the noise reduction requirement~ shall be made and nceded noise insulation features shall be included in the design. Any new onailc commercial and indusltid development that has the potential m generate outdoor noise levels that exceed 70 dBA Ldn on fixed ongoing oouloor activity areas (i.e., eating arm) associated with mucmres on She golf course (/.e., golf course clubhouse) shah conduct a detailed noimo. blipact I!lalyl~l. Ally letire olildoof u~l If ell2 I~OCin- ted with office, commercial, and inclust~al activities that are located in areas with noise levels that exceed 75 dBA Ldn ate required to be shielded from the noise sources, by ufiliTiqg sound barrier walls or structures acting u effective sound bamers, to insure conformance with the City's noise standard. Responsible for Implementor Monitoring' Timing *Project Applicant · c~t~ P~ncr Project Appncm city Prior to approval of development plane Prior to approval of development plsm Verification of Compliance Signature Date Footnotes are printed on page 21. Jn/tgoqoeot .romp 7 TABLE I (continued) General Dynamics - Rancho Cucamonga Sub-Area Specific Plan - Mitigation Monitoring Program Mitigation Any new oneire commercial and indus- trial development titat has the potential to generate outdoor noise levels that exceed 75 dBA Ldn on active outdoor use areas uaociazed wizh office, commercial, and industrial activities shall conduct · detailed noise impact analysis. Office, commercial, ned indusUial structures that are located in area with combined noise levels that exceed 70 dBA Ldn shall include noise insulation features in the design to meet City and Statc standsrds. Conventional consauction with windows closed and fresh air supply systems or air condi- lioninS will normally meet these requirements. if these structures are located in areas with combined noise levels that exceed 75 dBA Ldn, · detailed analysis of dae noise reduction noise inmlation features shah be included in the design. Responsible for Implementor Momtorin[' Timing Project Applicant City Planner Prior to approval of development plans Project Applicant City Planner Prior to approval of development plans Verification of Compliance Signature Date Footnotes are printed on page 21. IP"'M)90OOI .MMP Air Oualitv 10. TABLE I (continued) General Dynamics - Rancho Cucamonga Sub-Area Specific Plan - Mitigation Monitoring Program Mitigation The following SCAQMD mitigation measures have been incorporated into the proposed project. These roeatones can reduce emissions associated with new development. The majority of these measures are oriented toward project construction or at least more delailed levels of planning than is aseo- ciated with a specie plan amendment, General Plan ameninent, and zone change. The feasibility and appropri- ateness of each measure can best be determined at the time of Developmenl/ Design Review for the proposed Sub- Area Specific Plan. As such, the fol- lowing mires are recommended for filmre levels of project implementation, but only as determined to be feasible and means of implementation of these potemial measures are illtier described below: a. Use low-emission alternative fuel (i.e., methanoi, bulane, or propane) as practicable in mobile construc- tion equipment (e.g., tractor, scraper, dozer). Res~nsible for Implementor Monitoring' Timing Project Applicant City Planner Project Applicant/ Director of Grading and Conununity Building Permit Development Conditions Prior to approval of development plans Prior to issuance of grading and/or building permits, as applicable Verification of Compliance Signature Date Footnotes are printed on page 21. JB/1909O001 .MMP -q 9 TABLE I (continued) General Dynamics - Rancho Cucamonga Sub-Area Specific Plan - Mitigation Monitoring Program Verification of Compliance Mitigation b. Develop · trip reduction plan to achieve 1.5 AVR for conmnmction employees. c. Comply v/hit SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 concerning impleme, ntalion of dust suppression ~chniques to prevent fugitive dun from cruting a nuisance offsite. d. Employ construction activity man- agemerit techniques, such as extend- ing Ihe consUuction period, ducing ~he number of pieces of equipment umed simuluneoudy, increas/ng Ihe distance between emission sources, reducing or changing the hours of conMruction, and scheduling activity during off- e. Suspend grading operations during tim and second atage smog alerts. Maintain consreaction equipment engines by keeping Ihem adequately mned. Use Iow-sulfur fuel for ststionary construction equipment. Respondble for Implementor Monitoring' Timing Project Applicant Director of Prior Io issuance of Community grading permits Development Project Applicant Director of Prior to issuance of Community grading permits Development Project Applicant/ Director of Grading and Community Building Permits Development Conditions Project Applicant/ Grading Permit Conditimm Project Applicant/ Grading and Building Permit Conditions Project Applicam/ Grading and Building Permit Conditions Direclor of Community Development Director of Community Development Director of Community Development Prior to iuuance of grading and/or building permits, as applicable Prior to issuance of grading permits Prior to iuuance of grading and/or builtling pennira, u applicable Prior to issuance of grading and/or builtling permits, as applicable Signature Date Footnotes are printed on page 2 1. TABLE I (continued) General Dynamics - Rancho Cucamonga Sub-Area Specific Plan - Mitigation Monitoring Program Mitigation Use existing power sourcu (e.g., power poles) or elm-fuel generators ralher Ihan temporary power geneS. Use low-emission onsite equipment (e.g., melianol-, propane-, or butane-powered internal combustion engines) instead of diesel or gasoline. Upon application to lie City for Development/Design Review, lie project developer shall submit a site plan and such other material as may be appropriate to describe the Transportation Demand Manage- ment (TDM) program proposed for lie pro/ect which is lie subject of lie specific development design review (no TDM program shall be required will respect to lie golf conne and related improvemere). The TDM program will comply will lie TDM Ordinance adopted by lie City and will include an itemization of lie TDM measures. Each TDM measure incogporated into the project will satisfy lie requirements of lie TDM ordinance and include estim-_~_e~_ nip reduction Responsible for Implementor Monitoring' Project Applicant/ Director of Grading and Community' Building Permit Development C.onditions Project Applicam/ Director of Grading and Conununity Building Permit Development Conditions Project Applicant Director of Community Development Timing Prior to issuance of grading and/or building permits, u applicable Prior to issuance of grading and/or building permits, as applicable Prior to approval of development plans Verification of Compliance Signature DMe Footnotes are printed on page 2 1. JB/19OgO001 .MMP TABLE I (continued) Miligation targets, polenlial rumling/implemen- tation sources, iden6ficntion of individuab/agene/es responsible for timing/phasing of implementat/on in relation fa the devdopmem of I~ project site. In devdoping the TDM program, the project developer should give consideration to the following TDM measures (without limimion), u · The establishment of onsite video conference facilities in office path which employ ! ,000 people of more. · Prominion of perlesmart citcula- hon to connect publi~ ireeta, parking areu and publi~ Immt facilifiee with buildings and ~ open epacee. · Ch'culafion system deai~n which m:[ucea confers between vehicu- lar and pedeatrian traffic. General Dynamics - Rancho Cucamonga Sub-Area Specific Plan - Mitigation Monitoring Program verification of compliance Req~onsible for Implementor Monitoring' Timing Signature Date Footnotes are printed on page 21. Jn,' -',90001 .MMP TABLE I (continued) General Dynamics - Rancho Cucamonga Sub-Area Specific Plan - Mitigation Monitoring Program Miligation · Identification of m-a~nsit improvemenu such u bus shel- ters, bus puU..outs and bus pads, as my be required by the City Engineer and the City Planner under the TDM Ordinan~, · Transit linkages with the Metro- link station to be developed wiflfin Parcel X. · Installation of shower facilities and bike racks for use by pernorm walking or bicycling to work. · Provision of off-~teet parking close to buildings for designated use by carltools and vanpools. · Potentially locating ~ services within or adjacent to subject project. · Provision of off-site bicycle trails linking the facility to bicycle commuting routes. · Provision of onsite employee services such as cafeterias, banks, postal services, etc. · Scheduling of truck deliveries and pick-ups for off-peak hours. Responsible for Implementor Monitoring' Timing Verification of Compliance Signature Date Footnotes are printed on page 21. Ja/19090001MMP 13 TABLE I (cominued) General Dynamics - Rancho Cucamonga Sub-Area Specific Plan - Mitigation Monitoring Program Verification of Compliance Mitigation The TDM propam shall be subject to review by the City Planner or the Planning Commission, u applica- ble, in conjunction with the Development/Deign Review. I !. Require development practices that meximize energy conservation4 as a prerequisite m pennil approval. 12. Improve the thermal integrity of buildrap, and reduce the thermal load with automated time clocks or occupant sensors. 13. Inu'oduce window glazing, wall insula- tion, and efficient ventilation methods. 14. Introduce energy-efficient beating and coohi appliances, such as water heaters, cooking equipment, refrigera- tors, air conditionen, furnaces, and boiler uniU. 15. Use devices that minimize the combus- tion of lossit fuels. 16. Capture waMe heats and re-employ it in nonresidential builtimp. Responsible for Implementor Monitoring* Timing Signature Project Applicant Project Applicant Project Applicant Project Applicant Project Applicant Director of Commumty Development Building Official Building Official Director of Building and Safety Director of Community Development Building Official Prior to approval of development plans Prior to issuance of certificates of occupancy Prior to issuance of building permits Prior to issuance of certificates of occupancy Prior to issuance of boilding permits Prior to issuance of build/ng permits Date Footnotes are printed on page 21. j 90001 .MMP TABLE I (continued) General Dynamics - Rancho Cucamonga Sub-Area Specific Plan - Mitigation Monitoring Program Mitigation 17. Landscape building and median land- scape ares wi~h native drought- resistant species, u appropriate, to reduce wafer consumption and to pro- vide passive solar benefits. I 8. Requite design features, operating procedures, preventive maintenance, operator training, and emergency response planning to prevent the release of toxic ponutants, u appropriate. 19. Ensure compliance with notitication and asbestos removaJ procedures oudined in SCAQMD Rule 1403 to reduce ubestos-re!-_~_eA_ air quality impacts and health hazards. Earth Resources Subject to such limitations an may be set forth in any applicable development agreement, smacmres to be constructed under the proposed Sub-Area Specific Plan shall be required to comply with 20. all local and Rate devdopment stan- dartIs (grading permits, A!quist-Priolo Zone Act of 1972, Uniform Building Code, etc.). Responsible for Implementor Monitoring* Timing Project Applicant Director of - Prior to issuance of Community building permits Development Project Applicant Project Applicant Director of Community Development Building Official Building Of~cial Prior to approval of development plans Prior to demolidon of existing buildings Prior to issuance of building permits Verification of Compliance Signature Date Footnotes are printed on page 21. jS/x9Og0001 .MMP 15 TABLE I (continued) Mitigation General Dynamics - Rancho Cucamonga Sub-Area Specific Plan - Mitigation Monitoring Program 2 I. Prior to the issuance of · grading permit for development of a mumre, · mabmarface geotechnical investigation shall be conducted to determine the likelihood of Rimde uulement and differential compaction with reqg~t to the subject mucmre. Findings of this /nvestigation shall be submilled to the City ,and grading operations shall adhere to the reconuncndations identilicd in the geotechnical report. Hvdrolo~v/Drainate and Water Ouali~, 22. Implementor Project Ai~tieant Project Applicant Similar to development that would be allowed on the project site under the existing IASP, various storm drain improvements will be installed, u development of the proposed Sub-Area Specific Plan propugs, to convey the post-developmem oatsite atom flows into the existing storm drain facilities adjacent to the site. The propogd storm drain facilities will be sized and located to conform to the City's current storm flow conveyance policy. Verification of Compliance Responsible for Momtoring* · Building Official City Enginer Timing Prior to issuance of grading permits Prior to approval of development pl~n~ Signature Date Footnotes are printed on page 2 1, JB~' ^'xg(NX)I .MMP TABLE I (continued) 23. General Dynamics - Rancho Cucamonga Sub-Area Specific Plan - Mitigation Monitoring Program Verification of Compliance Mitigation Prior to the issuance of a grading permit for development of mtuctures, erosion conl~ol measures that include Best Management Practices (liMPs) and compliance with National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) stormwater quality requiremere shall be included within construction plans. Bi01otlcal Resources No significant impacts on biological r~nources will result from conmn~clion of Ih¢ project ~it~; IherCfore, no miligation measures are recommended for biological rcsoufcel onelie. hblk Servkes and Utilities Responsible for Implementor Momtoring' Timing Project Applicant Director of Prior to issuance of Community grading permits Development Signature N/A N/A N/A N/A 24. All toilet, nhower, and faucet fixtures shall be of an "ultra low-flow* nature. 25. Onsite landscaping shall use water- conserving plato material. 26. Automatic landscaping irrigation systems shall be used. 27. Automatic shut-off faucets shall be used in offices/commercial/retail facilities. Building Official City Planner city ~r Building Otcial Prior to approval of building penn/Is Prior to approval of building permits Prior to immnce of certilicates of occupancy Prior to approval of building permits I~oject Applicm Project Applicant Project Applicant Project Appncm Date N/A Footnotes are printed on page 21. ,JB/Ig04~(M)J .MMP 17 TABLE I (continued) General Dynamics - Rancho Cucamonga Sub-Area Specific Plan - Mitigation Monitoring Program Miligalion 28. Landscaping and irrigation system shall be designed Io conserve water Ihrough Ihe principles of Xeriscape u defined in Chaplet 19.16 of lhe Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. 29. Similar to all development within the CCWD, ~he devdopment of Ihe Sub- Area Specific Plan would require payment of fees in accordance wilh the CCWD wutewater facility fee program. 30. The project applicant shall implement a source reduction and recycling program for Ihe proposed Sub-Area Speci~c Ptan which my include Ihe following: Provide recycling facililie~ II~at allow paper, metal, plulic and glaumbeaepamed. Compost green waste, specifically green waste from Ihe proposed · Use minimal maintenance planIs for landscaping. Responsible for Implementor Monitoring' Timing Project Applicant Director of Prior to approval of Community building perms Development Building Official Director of Community Devdapment Prior to issuance of a building permit Prior to approval of development plans Verification of Compliance Signature Date Footnotes are printed on page 21. ~ -~oooa .~aedP TABLE I (continued) General Dynamics - Rancho Cucamonga Sub-Area Specific Plan - Mitigation Monitoring Program Mitigation 31. Prior to issuance of building permits, development impact fen in accordance with Cucamonga Schooa Digrict and Chaffey Joint Union High School Diarict ,hall be !rod. The4e devel- opment impact fees shall not exceed lime maxinmm amount per square foot u set forth in State Assembly Bill (AB) 2926. No mitigation measures are required; how- ever, the following meamares are proposed to minimize overall energy consumplion. 32. In order to conserve energy, individual developmere on the project sit~ shall incorporate energy efficient technolo- reduce the onait~ demand of electri- city, natural gas and fuel. 33. Implementalion of the project shall comply with Title 24 of the California Uniform Building Code. Responsible for implementor Monitoring' Timing Project Applicant Building Official Prior to issuance of Project Applicant Project Applicnnt Building Official Building Officid Prior to issuance of cenilicates of occupancy Prior to issuance of buildings permits Verificahon of Comphance Signature Datc Footnotes are printed on page 21. JB/19OgO(X}I .MMP 19 TABLE I (continued) General Dynamics - Rnncho Cucamonga Sub-Area Specific Plan - Mitigation Monitoring Program Responsible for Mitigation implementor Monitoring' Timing Hazardous Materials 34. Due to d~e Sub-Area SpeciRc Phn's beneficial inspact related to the onsite potendal threat of b---rdous ~*_,_e_4ab contamination, measures in addition to the existing local, state, and federal hazardous materials regulations/ requirements and guidelines are not needed. Verification of Compliance Signature N/A N/A N/A N/A Date N/A Footnotes are printed on page 21. J ~0001 .MMP TABLE I (continued) Mitilation NIA -, Not applicable. Foomotes. I General Dynamics - Rancho Cucamonga Sub-Area Specific Plan - Mitigation Monitoring Program Verification of Compliance Responsible for 1 Implementor Monitoring' Timing Signature Date A project manager reigned by the. Conmmnity Development Director will oversee monitoring of all mitigahon measures. Fixed ontoine outdoor activity are. - These outdoor arm relate to activities such as eating areas that are associated with structures on the goff course such as the Soft course clubhouse. Aclive outdoor uses areas - Outdoor active use areas asaociated with the proposed office, commercial, and industrial uses are areas where people congregate and remain for extended periods of time. Off-a~ak traffic hours - Off-peak traffic hours refers to the hours in · 24=hour period with the lowest hourly volumes of measured traffic. Conversely, peak traffic hours are those hours which have the higheat traffic volumes. Typically, litere are two peak periods in · 24-hour period, an a.m. peak and a p.m. peak. Though peak and off-peak traffic hours may vary by location or jurisdiction, generally a.m. peak hours occur between 6 to 9 a.m. and p.m. peak hours are from 3 to 6 p.m. Therefore, oH-peak traffic hours would generally occur between 9 a.m. and 3 p.m. and between 6 p.m. and 6 a.m. Development Draclicea that maximize energy conservation - Specific examples of development practices that maxamaze energy conservation may include, but are not limited to the following: · Use of central water heating systems · Incorporation of shade trees on southern and western side of buildings to reduce building heating/cooling needs · Use of double-parted glass windows · Use of light-colored roofing and facade materials to reflect he. at · Increased wall and attic insulation beyond Tide 24 requirements Waste heat - Waste heat refers to the heat energy byproduct that my be given off by various heating/cooling equipment or various manufacturing processes. Examples of capturing and re-employing waste heat include: Co-generation of energy whereby the waste heat from heating/cooling · building is captured and used to heat water for that or another building. · Modifying induMrial/manufecturing proceoes to create closed loop ayems, whereby waste heat produced as a result of one process is used as · source of heat energy for anodmer. JB/19090(}Oi .MMP 21 A'H'A~ A MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM REPORTING AND IMPI-gMENTATION FORM RANCHO CUCAMONGA IASP SLYAREA 18 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM REPORTING AND IMPLEMENTATION FORM Project File: Mitigation Measure: Location: Impact Issue: # # Onsite Land Use and Planning Noise Earth Resources Biological Resources Energy Description of Activity/Method of Implementation: Disposition: Comments/Revisions: Phase: # Offsite Traffic and Circulation Air Quality Hydrology/Dralnage and Water Public Services and Utilities Hazardous Materials Mitigation measure for the above-noted project phase implemented. No further action is required. Mitigation measure for the above-noted project phase is not fully implemented. Further action required. (Please explain below) The mitigation measure for the above-noted project phase is not in compliance. Further action required. (Please explain below) Completed by: Name: Title: Dam: Approved by: NalTle: Title: Date: JWlgOg(N3OI.MMP A-I ~z DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT June 1, 1994 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Brad Bullet, City Planner APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION DECLARING SUPPORT FOR THE ETIWANDA HISTORICAL SOCIETY AND THEIR APPLICATION FOR FUNDING FROM THE ADA COOPER HISTORIC PRESERVATION ENDOWMENT TRUST FUND RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution showing Council support of the Etiwanda Historic Society's proposal. BACKGROUND The Etiwanda Historic Society has submitted a proposal to receive a large grant in excess of $1 million dollars for historic preservation purposes. These funds are in the revocable living trust of Ada Cooper, who served as a member of the City's Historic Preservation Commission from 1977 to 1993. The chance that these funds can be used in our community is tremendously exciting. Ada had a strong commitment to see historic preservation efforts continue in Rancho Cucamonga. The Etiwanda Historic Society proposal is very much in line with the hopes Ada expressed during her tenure on the Historic Preservation Commission. Proposals were due to the attorney for the Ada Cooper estate on May 16, 1994. Staff is aware that the Etiwanda Historic Society proposal was submitted and received by the trust attorney on May 16. Staff is also aware that a proposal was to be submitted by the Charley Community Cultural Center of Upland for the same grant dollars. The City Council support, shown by passage of the attached resolution, will be forwarded to the Etiwanda Historic Society. ResM~PJbmitte/~~/ City Planner BB:gs Attachments: Resolution declaring support A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING SUPPORT FOR THE ETIWANDA HISTORICAL SOCIETY AND THEIR APPLICATION FOR FUNDING FROM THE ADA COOPER HISTORIC PRESERVATION ENDOWMENT TRUST FUND. WHEREAS, Ada Cooper was an active member of the community, devoting countless volunteer hours to a variety of organizations including the Cucamonga Women's Club and the Rancho Cucamonga Historic Preservation Commission, and WHEREAS, Ada Cooper established an Historic Preservation Endowment Fund for a local historic preservation group to establish a museum or similar preservation project, and WHEREAS, The City of Rancho Cucamonga has supported preservation projects and programs through the adopted General Plan goals and policies (as shown in Exhibit A1, Pages III-65, III-91, III-93, and III-94), and WHEREAS, the City's Etiwanda Specific Plan has identified and established the need for the development and protection of a strong historic preservation element along Etiwanda Avenue within the core of the historic Etiwanda community (as' shown in Exhibit B, Pages 3-2 through 3-4 and 5-4 through 5-6, Figure 5-4, Page 5-24, Figure 5-5, Pages 5-40 and 5-41, and Figures 5-43 and 5-44), and WHEREAS, the City and the Etiwanda Historical Society have worked successfully together on the development of the Chaffey/Garcia Residence Museum and Barn Replica Project for the last eight years, and WHEREAS, the Etiwanda Historical Society's Endowment Application Proposal includes the establishment of a place and program that includes the preservation of a number of historic City residences and a replica of an early 1900's citrus packing house for museum and preservation educational purposes, and WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga finds the Etiwanda Historical Society Endowment Proposal is consistent with and would implement applicable goals and policies of the City's General Plan and Etiwanda Specific Plan, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby endorse and support the efforts and application by the Etiwanda Historical Society for the Ada Cooper Historic Preservation Endowment Trust Fund. FURTHER, the City Council, to the extent required by the Cooper Trust and to the extent allowed by applicable laws, will cooperate with the Etiwanda Historical Society by any reasonable means necessary to accomplish the goals of the Cooper Trust and provide a high quality facility for the citizens of Rancho Cucamonga to see and learn about the history of this community. Cucamonga (see Table 111-8). General locations for these proposed facilities are indicated on Figure 111-6. OBJECTIVES: The objectives enumerated below and the subsequent policies ensure that the City offers a rewarding educational experience to its residents. constraints imposed on facilities constructed by Proposition 13. Opportunities which shall be explored include the Emergency School Classroom Law of 1979 (AB8). The City shall continue to support state legislation allowing the construction of school facilities through special assessment districts. Mar~age development to allow timely provision of educational facilities necessary to serve that development. · Work toward cooperation with the school districts for a learning environment that is capable of meeting the educational and recreational needs of the City's school- aged population and that encourages a diversity of experiences. · Set 'aside sufficient natural and historic areas for purposes of teaching environmental and histodc values, and provide equipment and facilities to support these programs. POLICIES: · The tentative school site locations are provided as an indication of the general proximity for future school locations, based upon the needs ofthe surrounding areas. The sites shown as · proposed are not necessarily owned by the respective school districts nor is the location site necessarily specific. The depiction of a school site is an indication of a projected future need that may be adjusted over time as the City and school districts develop. · · The City shall work closely with local school distncts to develop solutions to the fiscal III- 65 The City shall explore means by which development that indirectly creates the need for more schools (e.g., development which creates substantial job opportunities in tum creates the demand for local housing which in turn creates the need for schools) shall contribute to meeting these needs, The City, through the Community Services Department, shall continue the policy of joint use of school facilities for community recreational purposes. The City, in conjunction with local school districts, shall develop ongoing programs designed to educate students concerning the purpose, operation and services of City government. Parks and recreational facilities developed by the City shall be made available to local school districts for educational purposes. Special attention shall be given to providing 387 GENERAL PLAN EXHIBIT A Where histodc centers exist, i.e., old - Industnal development shall be buffered Alta Loma, Cucamonga, North Town to avoid any adverse environmental or and Etiwanda, they should be upgraded visual impacts. and maintained as centers for the districts that have developed around - Recreational as well as functional links them. with the rest of the City should be provided in the form of a pedestrian/ Neighborhood district plans should be bicycle path running east-west and prepared for North Town, for Old Alta connecting withtheDeerCreekcorridor, Loma, Old Cucamonga, and Etiwanda the Cucamonga Creek corridor, and areas, and for other histonc centers if on-street bicycle routes. necessary to preserve their character and, at the same time, develop their A neighborhood center plan (overlay · Since the Chaffey College community has measures: been developed through the years as a non-urban environment which reflects the - natural character of the physical surroundings, any development adjacent to the campus should be designedto reflect the same values. Specific attention should - be made to the following: Proper scale and clustering of buildings Use of natural landscaping materials Avoidance of hard design and grading Preservation of open character. A schematic plan for the development of North Town primarily addressing its physical form should include the following features. New housing in the northeast and south- west sections of North Town should be clustered to provide some shared open space particularly along Deer Creek. The setback from Deer Creek should serve as a recreational corridor as well as a flood plain. Surrounding areas should be developed in a way that minimizes impacts on North Town. Retention on the "old town" character by use of period architecture and adaptive reuse of older buildings. Establishment of a special streetscape design for the commercial area along Amethyst Avenue north of Base Line Road. Establish standards for pedestrian oriented commercial developments in the "old town" area. Where no histodc center exists in a district, e.g., Planned Communities, a center appropriate to the character of that district should be developed to serve the same functional and symbolic role. III- 91 The use oftree planting should be used to reinforce neighborhood organization as described for distdct organization. designed so that they relate as a visual unit and share common vehicular and pedestrian access routes. The organization of industrial subareas should respond to the functional require- ments of its primary use(s) and transportation mode(s). The centers of neighborhoods and subareas should be developed as functional and social focal points. Centers- should be designed according to the same guidelines established for district centers. A unique identity should be developed for each district and for each neighborhood and community using the elements identified above so that each is different from the others. In particular, variations on the signage system, tree planting plan and the materials used in centers can establish differences among districts and neighbor- hoods. Districts and neighborhoods should be integrated into the overall City context through the use of clear linkage systems Elements which integrate the district and neighborhood into the City as a whole have the ability to cut across area boundaries to help form a "structural fabnc" with which many areas can be identified. Unifying elements can include: Major arterial roads such as Foothill Boulevard, Base Line Road, Archibald Avenue, and Haven Avenue are identifiable elements of many districts and neighborhoods. Design considerations along these roads should enhance these relationships to further "tie" the districts to the overall community identity. The mountain vistas form an integral part of the identity of nearly all districts and neighborhoods and therefore provide a City wide element. These vistas should be protected and enhanced through the design review process. including: transit, open space, bicycle and ~ pedestrian routes, and signing. Micro-Neighborhoods: . In addition to the older neighborhoods of Alta · Residential areas should be developed Loma, North Town, Cucamonga, and and comprised of distinctive micro- Etiwanda, there are sites and structures in points of interest. The most prominent one is Each micro-neighborhood should be theoldVirginiaDareWineryattheintersection internally homogenous. of Foothill and Haven. This recently renovated Each micro-neighborhood should be physically and visually distinguishable from adjacent housing areas. Dwelling units should be sited and building complex is recognized by nearly everyone in the community as a major source of identity for Rancho Cucamonga. Other landmarks include: Garcia House on Etiwanda .Avenue, Milliken Rancho on Arrow at Haven, which is now La Mancha Golf Ddving Range; Landmarks & ,=ocai t~oints: Policies /- Cousins (Christmas) House on Archibald near 6th Street; Rains' House on Carnelian at Vineyard; Cucamonga Winery (Thomas Brothers) on Foothill at Vineyard; a group of stone houses along Hillsjoe Avenue near Archibald; the intersection of Base Line Road and Hermosa Avenue; the old Etiwanda commercial area atthe intersection of Etiwanda Avenue and Foothill; and Chaffey College . campus on Haven Avenue. Figurelll-lOshows L-~locations of landmarks and fccal points. iPOLICIES: Existing landmarks and focal points should be enhanced through physical improvements by the City and by pdvate developers. - Public improvements including street widening, installation of street lighting, and tree planting should be done in a mannerthat preserves the historic and rural integrity of landmarks and focal points. - Landmarks which qualify should be designated as Historic Preservation Sites in addition to being designated as histodc points of interest in the City. - Incentives should be provided to encourage adoptive rouse and/or compatible adjacent uses on sites on · . which histodc or focal elements are ,. located. ::~ ""' '~ " : , .-:-.:..,:.,,..-;.,.: ,'. ~ ~'.-,"-', ~ ,,'.._~...:,-- ... - ocation s ouid be reflexive of the ' ' '~' ·~ ~ :.::,. ~ impoRance of this interse~ion as a center ~ of communi~ a~ivi~, Any plans for ~ - 2 ~ developme~ at Foothill Boulevard an~ e .....,, .~ ,m I ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN EXHIBIT B However, it is apparent that these General Plan Fals cannot be fully realized in Etiwendm through the use of existing m~!iaMes; potential problems in the erems of community character, eireulafioo, commercial services, perks, tra~s sad land use have been identified in the f,~crzding chapter. The overall goal of the Specific Plan is to provide for the implementaUan of the General Plan, with emphmsb on the topic areas of community meter, circulation, commercial service, perira, trm~s, end lend use adjustments. COMMUNITY CHARACTER 3.31 SCOPE Community character is an overall topic area which is difficult to define, as it is influenced by many intaf~ibles. In this document, Community character consists of a number of elements, including: o Sense of Community Identity o Open ~ace and Rural Character o Architectural Desi~m o Landscape Design o Windbreaks The togowing Community character objective and related policies:are structured to reflect them elements. 3.32 COMMU. NITY IDENTITY OBJECTIVE: In arder to avoid tim hek of foam eltmnmtmr~ of many Southern California commtmitim, deveinpment h Btiwanda dmuld be guided by dmdgu standards and Iv,* ~eH,mS which reinforce the smme of community idemtity. architecture and other design features. .200 Reinforce community identity sad ereate a sense of continuity throughout the area through appropriate landscape feature. .300 Require special idacape and design treatments at major entrsaces to the community. " .400 .5OO Reinforce Etiwanda~j identity thrmah the codtinuation of windbreak system eqtml to or tattar than the exisitn~ system. Reinforce litiwsada~J identity by emphuizinf Mturel features while deemplmsbinf the amaic and impact of structtwti elements. 3-2 391 I-,'~ .600 Reinforce community identity by the selection of street, park, .~ trail and place names that relate to Etiwanda, its setting, or its' heritage through the use of old family and phoe names. .700 Encourage historical preservatio~ through d~velopment of criteria for preservation of historical structures and otl~ar, elements of historical significance. 3.33 OBJECTIVE= The aheadant ¢~en slaee which now daraeterifa gttwande and eon~lxda t~ Its a~ is · vailable nmaf~ witteh ahtadd be POLICIESt .100 Take steps to retain sufficient amounts of open Wace within the 8peeifle Plan area. space. ,. -.. =: ,300 F, neourafe . .qtO0 rquifmments throuih an incentive system. -.~. · Enemirsfe ~asterinl of development to prtmrve valuable spree and other rmturai femtm~s tht~ the use of mand requirements and an ineentivm system, !nmxesie immvmtivm desira mmeepts .and' landscape techniques ,e4)t Bnmmrslm the uUlbation~. of im~lie~. eMement~ and~ __ eeerlan and Good emt~l m as · , ~a ~-gtlwande~~ the 3-3 Y POLICIES: .100 Reinforce community identity through the application of a unifying architectural theme or features in the design of community service uses, commercial areas, and other focal points. .200 Reinforce community identity through the eneourugement of unifying arehictural styles or features in the design of residential structures. .300 Encourage the use of architectural styles that are informal, rustic and human in scale. .400 Encourage the use of traditional construction materials, such as native stone, brick, timber, wood siding tile and others as may /~-/"~,~pro riate. .500 Enhance Etiwanda~ character by usin~ arehiteetural techniques' a.nd elements which. draw upon Etiwanda~ history and provide a t~e to the area~J herxtage. .600 Provide for variety and discourage monotony in dwelling design by use of appropriate guidelines. 3.35 LANDSCAPE DESIGN OBJEi~TIVE: POLICIE8z .100 Develop mandatory standards relative to tree type, size and speeinf for streets, center medians, parkways, parking lots, pathways and trails. ,200 .300 Develop guidelines for tenein~ to enhance community identity. Utilize landscape techniques which preserve and enhance rural character where possible. ,400 .500 Encourage landseeping in excess of requirements through an incentive system. Landseepinl within new development should emphasize use of native trees, shrubs end wild flowers. 3-4 393 5.22 RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS .100 Purpose In order to carry out the provisions of Chapter 3, the following residential distriets are established: ER - Estate Residentl-~ District foe residential development at the density of cae dwem~ per acre or less. VL - Very Low Density Residential Distriet foe residential development in the 1-2 dw,.mn~s per sere ran~. L - Low Demi~ Residential District foe residential ~elopmeat m the 2-4 dw per aere~~,__~ LM - Low Medium Density Residential INstriet foe residential ._ developmint in the 8-i4 dwellinZs per sere rsn~e. Unless otherwise noted, all density ealc~!ations simll be ~msed on net/~oss acreqes. For the purposes of this chapter, net/S~s acreages shall not include had required foe dedications of adjacent rmn-loeal. streets, but may include land to be used for local streets and circulation. .200 Permitted and Conditional Uses The rollowir~ schedule indicates by the symbol wp, the uses that shall be permitted in each Residential Distriet, and by the symbol 'C" the uses that shall be permitted upon the granting of a Conditional Use Permit, All other uses shall be prohibited, except u otherwise noted. 5-4 394 .201 Residential Uses: USE DISTRICT Sir~le Family Dwelli~s ............ P P P P P* Duplexes ....................... P P P P P* T~i & Fourplexes ................. P~ P~ P P P Multiple Family Dwellings ........... P* P* P* P* P .20~ Other Uses: provisions of the Development Code . .. p p p p p Group Care faeilities for seven Nursery s~hools ..................... C Churches ........................ C C C C Cl~.'~s, hospitals, sanitariums~ and nutranK home ...................... C C Paro~hi and private set~ools ......... C C C C Private, noneommereisl clubs and lodges C C C C C Public utility and public service , structures and instslhUons .......... C C C C C Home oeeupa_tkmS ................ Family ears fmefiitims fro, six persons oe ln~ide~tsl ted a~sor7 structures end uses for the exclusive use of residents of site and their S~ests ............ Keeping of horses foe personal use on to of ............ P P P P P P P P P P / P P P P P P P P P - Note: Symbol · indicates uses permitted in ee~jtmetiot~ with o~tioMl development sts~isrds ordy, 395 5-5 Agricultural Uses: Article 5.22 - Residential Districts Prior to development, the following agricultural uses are either permitted or conditionally permitted on lots of 2.5 acres or more: (a) Permitted Uses: Farms for orchards, trees, field crops, truck gardening, flowering gardening, and other similar enterprises eartied on in the general field of agriculture. ang, grazing, breeding, boarding or training of large or sinai/animals: except concentrated lot feeding and commercial poultry and rabbit raising enterprises, subject to the following: Cats and dogs: limited to the keeping of not to exceed four (4) eats and/or tour (4) dop, over four (4) months of age. Small livestock: with the number of goats, sheep, and similar animals limited to twelve (12) per acre of total ground ares~ with no more than one (1) male goat. Cattle and horeesz including calves and colts over si.~ (6) months of age, with a maximum number of four (4) animals per acre of total ground area. Hop: (nongarbeZe fed) with a maximum number of two (2) per sere of total ground area. The total number of such animals on any parcel or premises not to exceed five (5) over six (6) months of age. Combinations of the above animals, provided the total density on any given parcel shall not exceed that herein In no event shall there be any limit to the permissible number of sheep which may be grazed per acre, where such grazing operation is conducted on fields for the purpose of eleanin2 up unhervested erops, stubble, volunteer or wild growth, and further, where sueh grazin2 operation is not conducted for more than (4) weeks in any six (6) month period. Aviary: Limited to fifty (50) birds per aere. 5-6 396 I *~' Special Studlee Overlay DIstrict (eelstalc) ii // / :.: :.ltlwanda Avenue // ,:- ,~liverlay Di·trlct // D co..,,~,..,t~ r / / ! live ay O · ct (PetFig. ve day District iII HWV~/,// ,,,. ,,o.,.i OVERLA 5~_~' //II!~1 - . ' ~ DISTRIC S ' ! i. ..: "397 .4O0 -- ...... Article 5.25 - Overlay Districts CS/OL - Community Service Overlay District .401 Purpose: In addition to meetin~ other t2ovisions of C~aptor 3, it is the purpose of the CS/OL lYmtriet to pmovide commercial and quai--eommereial toryices in · PYovide · onmmunity focal point in the heart of Etiwanda, to (b) Ralnfoeee a sense of community identity, and to (e) Encourage perpetuation of those elements and features which peruvials · fie to gtiwanda~J /' hsritsfm. CS/OL Dis~iet Boundm. ies:' .402 The provisions of this artiele shall apply to all land located within the area identified in Figure 5=5, between Victoria Avenue and a line 660' south of the Southern Paeifle Railroad. .403 Permitted Uses: All uses permitted in the Base District. .404 Conditional Uses: The following uses shah be tMrmitted subject to ttm ~rantin~ of a Conditional Use Permit: (a) (b) Uses conditionally permitted in the Base Distriet. Community uses, such u schools, nurMry schools, ehureh~m, parks, community buildings, band stands, and the like. Limited or specialized, low impact commercial services desifned to starve loeal residential arm, such ss~ / - Barber & ~uty Shotms - Farmers Mm*kets - Profemional & Medical Offices 5=24 398 I I I I '"',, ,,,, ~1~.~. * ,SERVICE OVERLAY DISTRICT I~' Fig. 5-5 399 5.42 ARCHITE_~TURAL AND DESIGN GUIDELINF.3 ~tent ,,,," '-. ~ /. meeit, tml to Pfeme~.e strueturm oreehiteetuiml .oe mpatible with, the ehm'teter o~"l~w that k musiUve to m~l -~ aPprovaL stml/nc~ed .20(~ .20:I ,202 Project design shall be guided sit such u Hews mature v bye e'-speeifie factors maeeemtully modified to local conditions,permitted unlem /U'ehiteet;ral arid desip elements which relate to ti~,~'''~ exLmtin( end desired character of Etiwanda are best .3OO - ruraJ, rather than urban - informal, rather than formal traditionat, rather than eontemporm, y _- rumtie, rather than polbhed - The sketehes in this seeUon and throupout the document arm intended to il/ustrate various Residential Projects Containlint Four Dwellinlm or lea · 301 The peoJeet ~ be dmiped in sensitive to~em compatible with, th: manner that is character of the .302 Eageemtve repeUUon of klentjeal miniIra family 5-40 Article 5.42 ,q- I' .400 Notable Existing Struetures~ \ l~gure~-44 identifies existing structures of historical or architectural merit or structures whiaim otherwise contribute to the character end visual quality of Etiwancla. .402 A reasonable effort shah be made to encourage the preservation of structures identified in Figure 5-44 as follows: (a) Such existing structures and uses located on legal Iota of record shall be considered as eenforming to provisions of ~etion 5.2 of this chapter, regardless of lot sise, setbacks and simila~ existing conditions, provided public health, safety or welfare is not threatened. (b) Such existing structures slmll be incorporated into the design of new development wherever possible. On loU of me ae~e or more,:-them structures shall not be included in dlmsity calculations, and will not reduce the nume~ of new dwellings permitted. · (e) In tra' op end C8/OL Districts, such structures may be converted to non-~esidential uses, subject to the Drovisionm of the OP end CS/OL Districts, rierresiH~ ively. Exeegt as specified below, move-ons for residential purlxaes slmll be subJet to refulations in effect elsewhere in the City, in aeeedanee with the lk,~!q;mueat Code. .501 Move-ons within the Etiw enda Avenue Overly DMtrleU In addition to meetinf city-wide criteria, structures to be moved into the E/OL District must be of siWnifieant architectural or historical merit ~e must otherwise reinforce the character of EUwanda &venus. .503 Move ma within the Community Service Overlay Dlet~ietz Provisions of .401 and .402 simll prevail, exeept that such structures may also be used for limited impact non-residential purp<mes, subJet to the limitations of the CS/OL District, Setion 5.25.400 401 24114 STn~'rr I~&VI '~ I~ E/ ,**,e Notable Structures ,_ ~ I 6986 (Address) / . Ak'Clmffey/Garcis House : to be telseated 'Utle ~-~..~- figurel "~~ It !1~!' .NOTABLE 5- · LSTRUCTU ES NOTABLE EXISTING STRUCTUK!~ iitiwxndm Ave. (address) Amemorss Pieeel Numbmr CmmmutUse 7567 227-181-37 Residence 7491 227-181-25 Residence 7165 227 -131 -23 Residence 7126 _ 227-111-8 - ~-Chureh 7050 ' 227-101-9 Residence 6956 227-101-5 Residence 6658 227-031-16 Residence 7089 227-121-18 Lumber Yard Office/ Old SPRR Depot 6490 225-171-14 Residence 6295 Chaffey-Gareia House Residence 7082 227-121-24 Residence 6563 227-011-17 Residmm 6155 , 225-191.,,t6 Residence Vietoeia Ave. (address) 1332 5 227-141-47 Residenm 13483 227-141-43 Residence IHustration Courtesy of lk~ Smith Fig.5 DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT June 1, 1994 Mayor, and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspect~~ RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND FOR TRACT 12902, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF HERMOSA AVENUE NORTH OF HILLSIDE ROAD RECO!qENDATION It is recomnended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond. BACKGROU IO/ANALYSI S The required one year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. Rel ease: DEVELOPER: Nordic Woods II. Ltd. P. O. Box 2308 Orange, CA 92669 Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $31,000 Respectful ly submitted, William j. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:SMG:dlw Y DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT June 1, 1994 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Jerry B. Fulwood, Deputy City Manager~ YOUTH ACCOUNTABILITY BOARD STATUS REPORT The Youth Accountability Board program appears to be exceeding expectation within Rancho Cucamonga. Over one hundred community members have contacted the representative of the Youth Accountability Board seeking information and expressing an interest in participating in the program. The training programs were held on April 27,1994 and May 3,1994 which were attended by over one hundred community members. The Youth Accountability Board will be meeting on the second Tuesday of each month beginning June 14, 1994 at the Neighborhood Center at 7:00 P.M. The San Bernardino County Probation Department's representative Cynthia Fuzie will be attending this evenings City Council meeting to provide a program update. DATE: TO:. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA May 24, 1994 STAFF REPORT Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Deborah Kaye Clark, Library Manager Request for direction in recruitment of Library Board of Trustees RECOMMENDATION Direct staff as to the manner in which Council would like to proceed in recruiting/appointing members to serve on the Board of Library Trustees. BACKGROUND City of Rancho Cucamonga Ordinance # 520 established a public municipal library and provided that the library be managed by a Board of Library Trustees. The ordinance further established the Mayor and the City Council as the appointing body, pursuant to California Education Code Section 18900 et. seq. fRes~pectfully submitted, Library Manager ORDINANCE NO. [~(~ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTABLISHING A PUBLIC MUNICIPAL LIBRARY IN AND FOR THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Sec. 1. Need for and Establishment of a Public Municipal Library. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has determined that the public interest, necessity, convenience and general welfare of the City of Rancho Cucamonga require a public municipal library. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has determined that a municipal library should be established in the City of Rancho Cucamonga pursuant to Education Code Section 18900 et seq.; and the City of Rancho Cucamonga has withdrawn from participation in the San Bernardino County Free Library System pursuant to Title I, Division 1, Chapter 6, Article 1 of the Education Code, which was a necessary prerequisite to the establishment of a public municipal library pursuant to Title I, Division 1, Chapter 5, Article 1 of the Education Code. Therefore, a public municipal library is hereby established in and for the City of Rancho Cucamonga pursuant to Section 18000 et seq. of the Education Code in order to adequately provide for the present and future needs of the residents of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Sec. 2. Environmental Assessment In addition to the foregoing, the City Council finds and determines that it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the adoption and implementation of the Ordinance will have a significant effect on the environment. 407 ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Page 2 Sec. 3. OrQanization of Public Municipal Library. The public municipal library shall be known as the "Rancho Cucamonga Public Library." The public library shall be managed by a Board of Library Trustees, consisting of five (5) members, to be appointed by the Mayor and the City Council. The trustees shall hold office for three (3) years, and vacancies shall be filled by appointment by the Mayor and the City Council. The Board of Library Trustees shall meet at least once a month at such times and places as they may set by resolution. At such meeting the Board shall cause a proper record of its proceedings to be kept. The Board shall also appoint one of its members President, who shall serve for one year and until his/her successor is appointed, and in his/her absence shall select their President Pro Tem. Sec. 4. Board of Library Trustees - Powers and Duties. The Board of Library Trustees shall have the powers, duties and authorities now and hereafter provided for by Education Code Section 18900 et seq. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: June 1, 1994 Mayor and Members of the City Council Mayor Pro Tem Chuck Buquet and Councilmember Gutierrez, As Members of the Cable Subcommittee UPDATE ON MARKS CABLEVI8ION ISSUES Rex In an effort to ensure that the residents of Rancho Cucamonga are provided with the best possible cable service, Mayor Pro Tem Chuck Buquet, a representative of the City Council Cable T.V. Subcommittee (Buquet and Gutierrez) has asked that Marks Cablevision prepare a critical path schedule to identify and manage future cable problems. This plan will be presented to the Subcommittee and City Staff for review and comment prior to being delivered to the City Council. Mr. William Marks, owner of Marks Cablevision, has stated that the problems which have occurred recently are temporary in nature and are due to the huge undertaking of combining three different cable systems and enhancing cable service to the residents of Rancho Cucamonga. Mr. Marks promised that his commitment to Rancho Cucamonga remains as strong as ever and he has already developed and begun to implement plans to remedy the problems which have already occurred and to prevent or minimize future problems. The problems which have surfaced are as follows: The collapse of the basic tier structure which caused approximately 1,400 - 1,500 subscribers in North Rancho to receive significantly higher rates ($10 - $12 per month) Billing errors such as double billing, late charges and disconnect notices Technical problems, resulting in fuzzy distortions specifically in North Rancho, pictures, outages and volume A problematic phone system which resulted in continuous busy signals, customers being placed on "hold" for extended periods of time, some customers being disconnected, and some customers not being able to get through on the phone at all A proposed rate increase for Southern Rancho residents of $1.70 per month The following actions have been taken to arrive at solutions to the problems: The collapse of the basic tiers was a business decision made to establish one uniform rate throughout Rancho Cucamonga and to help alleviate cable theft by removing the traps used to filter cable service. According to Marks Cablevision, the removal of the traps will also aid in making the entire system addressable and interactive and will allow the cable company to place the City on a single channel line up. This will assist in implementing the Public, Educational and Governmental Access channels. Although some customers did receive an increase, an overwhelming majority of North Rancho customers should receive a decrease in basic cable cost -from $24.95 per month to $23.65 per month. In addition, customers are receiving three more channels. The billing errors occurred as a result of transferring billing services. Marks Cablevision has stated that all erroneous late charges will be waived and all errors should be corrected by the next billing cycle. Individual billing problems are being addressed by the cable company as they are made aware of them. The technical problems occurred in North Rancho when the two head ends were connected and fiber optics installed. Most of the problems have been alleviated with only small pockets still experiencing problems. These are being corrected as the cable company is made aware of them. Credits will be issued for outages as the cable company is made aware of them. The cable company has met with representatives from GTE to resolve the phone system problems in order t0 meet the needs of the greater number of subscribers. In addition, Marks Cablevision has hired nine (9) new Customer Service Representatives to deal with customer calls. If a greater-than-normal volume of calls is expected, the cable company has offered to place staff at City Hall to assist in the overflow calls. The calls to City Hall would continue to be monitored by City staff so that residents have the option of talking to a cable representative (regarding billing or service problems) or to City staff (regarding a complaint about the cable company). Mr. Marks has also assured the Cable Subcommittee that Customer Service Representatives will 410 be trained and then updated on a daiIy basis to provide the best customer service. The proposed rate increase of $1.70 for Southern Rancho residents was implemented after the rate freeze expired (May 15, 1994) and is the first rate increase since February, 1993. City staff will continue to monitor Marks Cablevision's efforts in resolving thes~ problems and anticipating and minimizing future problems. Respectfully Submitted, Chuck Buquet Mayor Pro Tem Rex Gutierrez Councilmember 411 I~AI~I TIWC GET YOUR KICKS ON ROUTE 66 Leaving Phoenix on a morning flight to Amadllo, we will be met by our own luxury motorcoach for a local tour of Amariilo before settling down in our ~'~rvey Hotel. This evening we will ~art for Palo Duro Canyon for ~er and a special evening program. :~fter a continental breakfast, we head west to find the "MOTHER ROAD". Along our joumey today we will be seeing such attractions as the Cadillac Ranch and visiting several Old Route 66 comm~.~;f~e.,..'- a-'.- we travel across the Texas Panhandle. Following lunch in Tucumcari, N.M. '.~e will visit a local museum. Then it is ,~n to Santa Rosa where we will visit ~.he Blue Hole and the Territorial :-iouse Museum. Sunday morning we are off again to hunt for the remains of Old Route 66! Then on to Albuquerque where we will see a presentation in an Old Route 66 Theater, visit Old Town and take the Sandia Tram ride to the top of Sandia Peak - the longest tram in the world. While in A!buququeque, we will be able to spend time at the Indian Cultural Center, ride along the Turquoise Trail, have coffee in a ghost town, see ancient petroglyphs and much more!! Heading west again, we will visit the New Mexico Museum of Mining in Grants & cross the Continental Divide before seffiing down in Gallup at the colorful El Rancho Hotel. Pressing on we wii; stop a~"~,ed ROck State Park before crossing into Arizona. During the day we will stop at many places including an old Harvey House, currently being restored in Winslow. Then onto Two Guns, Winona and Flagstaff where we will spend~e night. Thursday morning we will head for Willjams and a tour of Route 66 presented by the U.S. Forest Service. Then travel the longest portion of Route 66 that still remains in use and ending this day in Kingman, Az. Then on Fdday, we are off to Oatman, Needles and Barstow and visiting several ghost towns along this section of the Old Highway! Onto Santa Monica with several stops including Rancho Cucamonga where some Old Route 66 history has been saved. Our last night will be at the end of the highway - at the Miramar Sheraton Hotel. Our final day we will visit the Will Rogers Museum before winging our way back to Phoenix. HISTORIC ~ ROUTE ',~ ~,~ S t?, G RANCH() the heART of Route 66 Ternlory a Visitors Bureau? A visitors bureau is a not-for-profit umbrella organization that represents a city or urban area in the solicitation and servicing of all types of travelers to that city or area . . . whether they visit for business, pleasure or both. The primary responsibility of the bureau in each city, county or region is to encourage tou- rists to visit and enjoy the historic, cultural and recreational opportunities the city offers. It is the single entity that brings together the interests of city government, trade and civic associations, and individual "travel suppliers" - hotels, motels, restaurants, attractions, local trans- portation - in building outside visitor traffic to the area. Urban tourism is an increasingly important source of income and employment in most metropolitan areas and therefore warrants a coordinated and concerted effort to make it grow. This growth is best nurtured by the role a visitors bureau can play in continually improving the scope and caliber of services the city provides to individual business and leisure travelers. Acting as a middle-man, the bureau is the city's liaison between potential visitors to the area and the businesses which will host them. It acts as an information clearing house and promotional agency for the city and often, as a catalyst for urban development and renewal. The people who staff a visitors bureau know their community well. A bureau can supply visitors with general .facts about attractions, accommodations, restaurants and special events in the city. Bur- eau personnel are always ready to answer questions and make out- of-towners feel welcome. Thomas Winery Plaza · 7965 Vineyard Avenue Suite F-5 · Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 · Phone (909) 9zl8-9166 SIMPLE RESTAURANT GUIDE ROUTE 66 (FOOTHILL BLVD.) RA NCHO C UCA MONGA AND SURR 0 UNDING AREAS Prepared By: Denise Corbitt & Stacy Mattson Students of: California State Polytechnic University, Pomona This guide is designed to give basic restaurant information for those traveling route 66 through Rancho Cucamonga, California. Sycamore Inn 83 18 Foothill BIrd. Rancho Cucamonga, CA (909) 982-1104 Hours: Mon.- Fri. Attire: Price Range: Comments: Saturday: Sunday: Dress Lunch 11:30 a.m. - 2:30 p.m. Dinner 5:00 p.m. - 10:00 p.m. (Fri. 'til 11:00 p.m.) 5:00 p.m. - 11:00 p.m. Only 3:00 p.m. - 10:00 p.m. Only $10.00 - $40.00 per person This restrauant was established in 1848 and gives an elegant dining atmosphere. It offers a variety of cuisine's, but is known for their prime rib. Magic Lamp 8189 Foothill Blvd. Rancho Cucamonga, CA (909) 981-8659 Hours: Mon.- Fri. Attire: Price Range: Comments: Saturday: Sunday: Casual / Dress Lunch 11:30 a.m. - 2:00 p.m. Dinner 5:00 p.m. - 10:00 p.m. (Ffi. 'til 10:30 p.m.) 5:00 p.m. - 10:30 p.m. Only 5:00 p.m. - 9:00 p.m. Only $10.00 - $42.00 per person This restaurant was established in 1957 and gives an elegant dining atmosphere. It also offers its own wine cellar to give you a variety of wines to choose from. The food varies from pasta, steaks, and seafood. Cash N Cleaver 8689 9th St. Rancho Cucamonga, CA (909) 982-710S Hours: Mon.- Fri. Attire: Price Range: Comments: Saturday: Sunday: Casual Lunch 11:30 a.m. - 2:00 p.m. Dinner 5:00 p.m. - 9:00 p.m. (Fri. 'til 10:00 p.m.) 5:00 p.m. - 10:00 p.m. Only 4:30 p.m.. - 9:00 p.m. Only Lunch ($4.00- $10.00) Dinner ($6.00- $28.00) For a comfortable atmosphere and great food Cask N Cleaver is the place. It offers great steaks and other varieties to choose from. Vince 's Spaghetti 8241 Foothill Blvd. Rancho Cucamonga, CA (909) 981-1003 Hours: Mon. - Fri. Attire: Price Range: Comments: Saturday: Sunday: Casual Lunch 11:00 a.m. - 2:00 p.m. Dinner 4:00 p.m. - 9:00 p.m. 4:00 p.m. - 9:00 p.m. 12:00 p.m. - 9:00 p.m. $2.00 - $6.00 per person (Closed Wednesday) Vince's Spaghetti offers homemade sauce for those Italian food lovers. This restaurant is small, but it offers excellent food and great portions at an excellent price. Claim Jumper 12499 Foothill Blvd. Rancho Cucamonga, CA Hours: Sun. - Mon. Attire: Price Range: Comments: 11:00 a.m. - 10:00 p.m. Tues. - Thurs. 11:00 a.m. - 11:00 p.m. Fri. - Sat. 11:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m. Casual $6.95 - $19.95 per person This extraordinary restaurant will make you feel like you went back in time to the mining era. It offers a variety of food and great desserts. Make sure you have an appetite to handle a mother load because the portions are tremendous. Foothill Chili Co. 870 E. Foothill Blvd. Upland, CA (909) 946-2279 Hours: Mon.- Thurs. Attire: Price Range: Comments: Fri. & Sat. Sunday: Casual $3.OO - $8.OO 11:00 a.m. - 8:00 p.m. 11:00 a.m. - 9:00 p.m. Closed While enjoying the award winning chili, be sure to browse through the interesting memorabilia. (7) Virginia Dare 8038 Haven Ave. Rancho Cucamonga, CA This historical winery offers four restaurants to choose from. It also offers a beautiful court in which some restaurants allow you to eat outside. This center also offers a movie theater for those who are in for a movie. All these attractions are with in walking distance. Make a note to see the historical wine crusher located behind Shelly's restrauant. Shelly's (909) 944-9337 Hours: Mon. - Sat. Attire: Price Range: Comments: Lunch 11:00 a.m. - 3:00 p.m. Dinner 5:00 p.m. - 11:00 p.m. 12:00 p.m. - 11:00 p.m. Sunday: Casual Lunch ($4.00 - $9.00) Dinner ($10.00 - $16.00) Shelly's has a wonderful tropical feel that comes to life with seafood and cajun specialties. Oriental House (Thai) (909) 944-5751 Hours: Mon. - Thurs. Lunch 11:30 a.m. - 2:30 p.m. Dinner 5:30 p.m. - 9:00 p.m. Friday: 5:30 p.m. - 10:00 p.m. Saturday: 5:00 p.m. - 10:00 p.m. Attire: Casual Price Range: $5.99 - $13.00 Comments: For great Chinese food and good atmosphere try the oriental house. Roses' Cafe Luna (909) 941-9822 Hours: Mon. - Fri. 7:00 a.m. - 11:00 p.m. (Except Fri. open 'til 1:00 a.m.) Saturday: 8:00 a.m. - 1:00 a.m. Sunday: 8:00 a.m. - 11:00 a.m. Attire: Casual Price Range: $4.50 Comments: Sandwiches and snacks are the specialty or you can relax with a cup of cappuccino in the courtyard. Yama Fugi (Japanese / Sushi) (909) 989-3377 Hours: Mon.- Sun. Lunch 11:00 a.m. - 2:00 p.m. Dinner 5:00 p.m. - 9:30 p.m. (Fri. & Sat. 'til 10:00 p.m.) Attire: Casual Price Range: $4.35 - $10.75 Comments: Yama Fugi offers a wide selection of Japanese dishes and methods of preparation. Enjoy the teppan tables, sushi bar or a choice of dinners from the menu. Spires 10387 Foothill Blvd. Rancho Cucamonga, CA (909) 980-0560 Hours: Attire: Price Range: Comments: 24 hours a day 7 days a week. Casual $3.99 - $7.25 with daily specials. Offers an atmosphere that families can relax and enjoy a simple meat. Good food and great for those in a rush. Rancho Cucamonea l/illaee 9950 Foothill Blvd. Rancho Cucamonga, CA Skipper's Grill & Bar (909) 945-1644 Hours: Mon.- Thurs. 11:30 a.m. - 12:00 a.m. Fri. & Sat. ll:30a. m.-2:00a. m. Sunday: 11:30 a.m.- 10:00 p.m. Price Range: $3.95- $19.95 Comments: This Western decor restrauant may be small but it offers good food. In addition, anyone looking for country music can hear it every Friday night in the sports bar. Bert & Rocky's Homemade Ice Cream (909) 989-2779 Hours: Mon. - Sun. 12:00 p.m. - 9:00 p.m. ( Sat. & Sun. open 'til 10:00 p.m.) Price Range: Jr. scoop $1.30, Med. scoop $1.75, Double scoop $2.95 Comments: Enjoy old fashioned homemade ice cream just like you'd make but without the mess. Because the ice cream is fresh and homemade there is always a large selection of flavors, making it well worth two trips. (/0) Chuck E. Cheese Pizza 9339 Foothill Blvd. Rancho Cucamonga, CA (909) 945-1779 Hours: Sun.- Thurs. Attire: Price Range: Comments: Fri. & Sat. Casual $2.00- $16.00 10:00 a.m. - 10:00 p.m. 10:00 a.m. - 11:00 p.m.. For a family that has children this is the perfect place. There is spectacular entertainment for the children. The only problem you might have is getting the children to stop playing and start eating. (11) Route 66 Cafe 9134 Foothill Blvd. Rancho Cucamonga, CA (909) 980-8444 Hours: Mon.- Fri. Attire: Price Range: Comments: Sat. & Sun. Casual $2.00- $6.00 6:00 a.m. - 1:00 p.m. (Closed Tues.) 7:00 a.m. - 1:00 p.m.. This cafe offers the Route 66 traveler a chance to relax and get off the highway without missing the sites because the cafe offers various '66' memorabilia's to enjoy. Thomas Winery (Oldest commercial winery since 1839) In this shopping center you can find three different types of restaurants and a coffee house to choose from. Frontier Steak House (909) 941-8793 Hours: Sun.- Thurs. 11:00 a.m. - 10:00 p.m. Fri.&Sat. ll:00a.m.-ll:00p.m. Attire: Casual Price Range: $5.00 - $14.95 Comments: The restrauant offers a great country decor and a wine cellar. The restrauant is also dark and cozy for those who are in a romantic mood. They offer great steaks as well as a variety's of other meals to choose from. Soup Plantation (909) 980-9690 Hours: Sun. - Thurs. 11:00 a.m. - 9:00 p.m. Fri. & Sat. 11:00 a.m.. - 10:00 p.m. Attire: Casual Price Range: $6.00- $8.00 Comments: The Soup Plantation is an all- you- can- eat soup and salad bar. This restrauant also offers a flesh bakery. Zendejas (909) 466-0633 Hours: Mon.- Thurs. Attire: Price Range: Comments: Saturday: Sunday: Casual $6.00- $9.00 11:00 a.m. - 9:00 p.m. (Fri. open 'til 10:00 p.m.) 9:00 a.m. - 10:00 p.m. 9:00 a.m. - 9:00 p.m. Home of the famous Zendejas field goal kickers. This family owned Mexican restrauant offers a wide variety of fine Mexican food. (Is) Coffee Klatch Hours: Attire: Price Range: Comments: (909) 944-5282 Mon.- Sat. 7:30 a.m. - 9:00 p.m. (Fri. & Sat. open 'til 10:00 p.m.) Sunday: 9:00 a.m. - 6:00 p.m. Casual $1.00- $3.25 The Coffee Klatch offers a country atmosphere in which anyone who is craving something sweet can be satisfied. They offer cheese cake and homemade cinnamon rolls. On Fri. & Sat. they offer various types of entertainment. While your there make sure you take a look at the community cupboard they offer the community. Homestyle Cafe (Guasti) 2902 E. Old Brookside Rd. Ontario, CA (909) 988-5354 Hours: Tues. - Sun. Attire: Casual Price Range: $2.00- $6.00 Comments: 6:00 a.m.- 1:00 p.m. (Closed Monday) Placed in the Guasti winery this cafe is well worth a visit. Make sure your prepared for generous helpings of food at an old fashioned price. (14) Griswold's Smorgasbord / Bakery & Gift shop 555 W. Foothill Blvd. Claremont, CA (909) 626-2411 Hours: Mon.- Sun. Attire: Casual Price Range: $4.95 - $6.95 Comments: Breakfast Lunch Dinner 6:30 a.m. - 11:00 a.m. 11:30 a.m. - 4:00 p.m. 5:00 p.m. - 8:30 p.m. This smorgasbord will make you feel like your in Denmark with all the Danish trimmings. Surrounded by beautiful landscaping and historical sites. Walking around and taking in the sites is a great way to make room for some delicious desserts from the fresh baked bakery items. N W E S Euclid Vineyard Haven / / © 9th Street Foothill Blvd. Route 66 ~Grove ~Archibald 15 Fwy ~Mi 11 i ken 13. Homestyle Cafe - Is out of the general vacinity of the map shown. It is located South in the City of Ontario. 14. Griswold's Smorgasbord / Bakery & Git~ Shop - Is located on Route 66 west of the mapped area. Framed Presenting: A new indie film column by Kurt Wolff [p.42] Gay film fest Inside: The guide to the 18th annual film festival Found: $24 mil How S.E can reap the franchise-fee windfall [p.22] I city, I daily Ex/Chron merger rolls forward- quietly [p. 10] THE SAN FRANCISCO BAY THE BEST OF THE BAY..,EVERY TZa~I~ ~ - N MAY.~, 19~ m VOL 28, The ugly downside of professional skateboarding in an indust~ that's not as independent as it seems S.F. 's skate police crackdown who represem them. Based primari- ly in San Francisco, Los Angeles, and San Diego, iCs a publicity- wary indusu7 worth an estimated $150 million a yest that hires kids as young as 13 to promote itSprod- ucts -- with remarkably little regu- lation or oversight, according to some industry leaders. If the kids who skate for a living were Hollywood actors, for exam- pie, their incomes and working environments would be strictly monitored, Bill Bueil, a regional administrator for the federal Department of Labor, told th~ Bay Guardian. Tbeir eamlngs would go into a trust fund; their working hours would be restricted to times when school was not in session (or they would be required to study with private totors). if their parents couldn't accompany them on *loca- tion* work, designated guardians · would. If skateboarders were consid- ered amateur athletes, ~ football or basketball players, coaches would probably restrict their con- tact with professional scouts. Even college recruiting would be regulat- ed: The NCAA strictly limits the contact university scouts can have with teenage athletes. In fact, if the younger kids were working for McDonald's, they'd have to get permission from their school counselors, and their work- ing hours would be tightly moni- tored. But skateboarders are consid- ered to be neither athletes nor actors, and their contracts are more 1Lke commercial sponsorship deals than like movie or sports deals. A Hell on wheels ---.,.-.- of men. whose vertically integrated companies thrive in large pa~ on the image of the wild young skaters There's an ugly downside to the glamorous life of professional sliatebdarders in an industry that's not nearly as independent as it seems. By Donnell' Alexander EIGHT YEARS Ann, I~IKE VALLELY was living eveP/teenage skateboarder's wildest dream. At the age of 16, the New Jersey native signed on as a professional skater, e4arning as much as $10,000 a month; he quit ~chool, left home, and moved to California. He's seen it all -- the rush of fame, the excitement of world tours, the fast and loose lifestyle that comes with sudden wealth. These days', it depresses him. Vailely is 23 now, married, with a child. He's old fOr a skater, and his skateboarding career is winding down ~-- and he still doesn't have a high school diploma. The one- time superst~r regrets how he spent his teen years: He blew too much of his money and saved too little. He signed con- tracts without the advice of a lawyer or agent. rich, and suddenly famous, some behave as one would expect rebel- lious teenage~ to bekave: They go wild. Southern California star Kateera Campbell, 20, described the lifestyle in an article in the March 6 Los Angeles Times: "You'can party," he said, "like, 24 hours a day.' Recent headlines present a dis- tufoing pictuze: Josh Swindell, 21, is awaiting trial for murder in Los Angeles, the L.A. Times reports. Last Christmas day, 19g0s Texas icon Jeff Phillips, 30, killed him- self. Mark Anthony 'Gator" Rogowski, a 25-year-old legend, was convicted of raping and killing a 21-year-old friend of his ex-girl- friend in a Cartsbad condomiulum -- a tragedy documented by Cosy Johnson in the Best Sports Stories of 1992 anthology. But the real story about profes- sional skateboardLng still has not been told. Based on more than 30 interviews with current and former skaters, industry executives, and government officials, and an exten- sive review of public record~k, the Bay Guardian has complied a pro- file of an industry that has received strikingly little publicity. It's the story of a lucrative bust- mons family.~' It's a timely complaint: Profes- sional skateboarding is growing fasL A decade ago, industry insid- ers estimate, there were only about 50 pro skaters in this count~/, Now there are ahnost 300. Many if not most of them are teenage kids. They make as much as $50,000 a year and travel the world on pro- motionai tours, most often without their pro-eats. Unsupervised, newly Vailely's: professional life has already lasted twice as long as that of the avenge skateboarding pro. When it ends, he isn't suze what he's going to do. Yet he considere himserf relatively incKT: He's not in jail, or suicidal, or addicted to drugs. And he's convinced that his sport has to change. "The shit that happened to me doesn't need to happen to these kids," Vailely told the Bay Guard- ian. 'They get tunnel vision and o% ') t',-, pro who "tides for" a company is less a salaried member of a team than a product endorser. The skater models equipment in advertising, uses it in tournaments, and proJ, motes it on tours. Those who are~ big enough stars can earn royall)~ checks from equipment that's mar~. keted in their image, ~ of like Nike Air Jordan on wheels. TheseS. contracts, Buell says, aren't coy4 et~ by cMld-isbor laws. Stacey Peralta, the legendary formor Fo and onetime co--owner of the Poweil-Peraita skateboard company, said the combination of big money and lax regulation is dnngerous. "The sport am'acts a lot of dysfuncHnnal kids," he told Bay Guardian. "They come in with something missing and ar~ easier to exploit." "What's dttely missing in the indusuT,* Pendta said, "is guldanc~ from the manufacto~." Jlll!l[~ Ptofe~'ional skateboarding is a tel; ativeiy new phenomenon, linked closely to the technological, cultot- al, and matke~g changes that over the past 20 yeats have to~ed skate- boarding equipment into a big international business. The old-fash~oned skateboazd~ of the '50s and '60s were made essentially of cheap plywood attached to metal wheels, which offered rough rides at slow speeds. Their popularity was fa~'ly limited until the mid-1970s, when the advent of the polyurethane wheel gave skateboardIng a whole new element. The new equipment was amooth and durable -- and skaters figured out that they could kick the hack of ~e board, j~unp at the .same time, and become airbo~e. Comim~i o. F,zge 18 S~nFrmncllgolay(3umfd~n May t8.1994 ITS ABOUT YOUR HAIR. Not ttmnlp41n~ led not hairplttel.'::~ ~:" ~ /, ~ ~I.~: a{fordabke clinical treatment program helps stop hair loss and " ! ~!~ ": ' gets your hair to 9row, naturally. , (888]927-4247 FACTORY OUTLET JUST ARRIVED: · New Summer Colors · We Now Make Plus Sizes Too! Third Street ~; Townsend, SF 415.495.491 Monday-SaturdaY 10-5:30 CUT E Love, Harmon:y Beauty PAVE Fine Gems · Custom Designs 5482 College Avenue · Rockridge/Oakland · 5101547-7181 Aerial acrobatics became increasingly flashy and complex. Skaten, mostly suburbanites, rode in empty pools, where the smooth, sloping surfaces offered concrete launching pads; eventually, pinks that catered to the skating craze began to appear. But the stunts were often dan- gemus. and by the mid- 1980s. sub- urban communities around the country had decided that skate- boarding parks were a liability. Perks closed down~ the craze began to fade, nnd the skateboarding industry, which was starting to make big money off equipment sales, was suddenly in morul dan- gel Enter Fausto ViteRo. A graduate of San Francisco State University, Vitello, now 48, had been a minor player in the skateboard business as the owner of Independent Trucks, which mnnufactmed the flexible mechanisms that connect skate- ~ wheels to the boards. Viiclio, who in 1981 founded a magazine called Thrasher, which catered to the skatere, spotted the excitement in the minor trend carted "street sksring.' Street skating needed no perks or pools; instead, the skaters used the basic urban infrastructure -- sidewalks, curbs, concrete steps, etc. -- as the backdrop for some increasingly dramatic new moves. Thrasher began to run colorful photo spreads bssed on uYoan loca- tions, with professional skaters as models, and street skafng took off. Street skating not only ener- glaed a new generation of skaters, it also heralded a new generation of equipment. Boerds and wheels had to become smaller to handle increasingly complicated tricks such as "curb flips" (an aerial move in which a street curb is used es fulcrum), "tail tides" (in which the board itself shdea down a staircase rail, the boatd's wheels on either side), and sireLint acrobatics. The new gear had a decided industry benef'tt: R wur~ out and broke much faster. Wheels became flat-spotted, boards ground down, and skaters -- fi'om plus to week- end amateurs -- would have to replace their gear mote often- For young skaters who were incroas- ingly snapped up by equipment manufacturers as models, that wasn't much of an issue. They got the equipment free of charge. But for kids who emulated their teenage idols (and theiz parents, who paid for the boards), it was a significant change. "We love it because kids go through the shit even faster," one skateboard company owner, who askaui not to be name& told the BaY Guardian. As Steve Kenon, the overt of ~lidatsd Sk~t~boasds in Same Cruz, points out, with skateboards costing as much as $100, qt's mo~ exlumsive to be a skateboarder than to be a Coffer." "Whatever the pros want, the kids want," he told the Bay Guard- ian. ~And the kids don't understsnd kate ~at what the pro s boarders get, they get for f~e." Perhaps it was an accident of history; perhaps it was a stroke of brilliant marketing. Either way. most industry insiders agree that involved in companies that made wheels, boards, macks, and cloth- ~ng, as well as a magasine that pro- rooted them .11 -- saved the skate- hoerd~ng business at a crucial point in ~he IWpe machine Unlike most professional sports, the magazines that cover the skate- boarding world are often owned and operated by the same people who make and sdl the products and hjxe the athletes as cpq~orate spon- sor. It would be l~t Sport3 illus- trated owning both the Chicago Bulls and Nike and paying Michael Jordan to play basketball, pose for magazine photo spreads, and pro- mote N~e shoes -- all in the same contl'act. Three men control the majority of the indusuy, and each one pub- lishes a magazine, manufactures equipment, and hires professional skaters, who appear as stars and models in the magazines' pages. All thxee also seem distinctly averse to publicity. Vile//o's S.F.-bssed Thrasher is the largest publication, with a cir- culation of abom 160,000, accord- ing to the magazine's publLsher's statement from December i993. Steve Rucco of Los Angeles owns BiB Brother magazine; Lawrence Balms of Totfence, Ca/if., owns TraasWorld Skateboarding' The three publications have distinctly different personalities, but they're siretier in one crucial aspect: Each acts as the flagship for a varied hierarchy of skateboard companies. The companies rounded, timraced, or couwolled by ritetag, Rocco, and Ba~na manufacture ingly, as the styke ot becomes c~fic, clottrine ~see side- bar). Although convotuted owner- ship deals and subsidiary business- es make pinpointing difficult, industry sources estimate that skateboarding materials manufac- tured or distributed by Vitelto, Rucco, and Balmn ~ all of whom have international distribution -- make up 70 percent of industry And with the exception of advertising from record compares, skatewear manufacturers, and a few independent manufacturers, the three magazines generally fdl theis space with ads from their own companies and feature stories on skaters representing products in which they have a f'mancial slake. The Bay Guardian found, for example, that 35 percent of the dis- play advertising in the May issue of Thrasher was for Vitello-Esociat- ed companies -- and that didn't include the nametons manufactur- ers for whom Vitello's companies make wheels and trucks. A former pro who gained fame in his own right, R~cco, 26, estab- lished a position in the merket is the late 1980s by playing the role of renegade. As a veteran of the legendary Dogtown skaters from Santa Monica, he posttinned him-. self as a figure sympathetic to skaters who would take on the then-dominant companies. Rocro, unlike the older men who dominat- ed company ownership when hs was gaining a foothold, said he would lot his pro skaters be them- selves sad keep r~les to a mini- Continued o. Fags 20 SECRETS ~m~ tbs'foRowing brands: inda, ~/*~t,Ttucks; Venture, Rae4 ~-~: .Sul ~h~Ster wigdis; Real, TIdnR ,BIs:kJ~bel, and Storm> boar .d.s~ and Fm¶ies, a b'ras~ of clotitinli . more hip and youthfu rd magazine. Slap. I in the asme building lind produced b~ Hig~ · Sec~taq With the Brother magazine cStnve Rocco, reade~ Rocco-initiat~ Pr[mi Bach. Recrsds m~ f~ ties Coun~, ~ c~ls 0toup, ~ ;weI t Disco'* Ins paui~s *-'.1~ own, s "l also'show Baixl Brl Bi[j 18 May 18+ 1~4 SIft FfaficMc0 Bey Gumtitles The skate police S.F. 's Embarcadero is the world's leading skateboard attraction. Why are the cops trying to shut it down?. By LeSlie I. Lowell and Nicole LaBorde IT'S A TYPICAL WEEKDAY AFTERNOON at Justin Her- man Plaza. Business executives in suits stroll by on their way to and from the Embarcadero Center high- rises; tourists wander out of the Hyatt Regency Hotel. And on the concrete steps that have become world famous to a rebellious teenage subculture, the daily battle with San Francisco's Finest is about to get under way. About 13 skateboarders, mostly wearing baggy jeans and T-shirts, are lined up waiting their turn to speed toward the steps, flip their boards in the air, and land at the bottom -- a stunt called an "ollie" that some of the talented skaters hope will be their ticket to professional stardora. The skaters display the same sort of discipline and dedication you'd expect to find on a soccer, foolball, or baseball field at prac- lice time. Complex moves are prac- ticed over and over until they're clean and perfect. Like teammates in a high-slakes competitive sport, Ihe skaters rarely laugh at one anuther's mistakes; instead, they offer complimenls when a trick is successfully completed. Justin Herman Plaza, many say, is Ihe skateboarding capital of the world. Kids as young as 14 and as old as 26 come from all over to test their skills on the bricks, curbs, and steps of what they call "the EMB." Jake Phelps, edilor of Thrasher magazine, calls it "a skate mecca"; one skater called it a "proving ground" where scouts from the big local skateboarding companies look for latentcd recruits to earn big money as professionals. But it's nol your lypical practice field: A few feet away from lhe steps, a prominent sign shows a red skateboard with a black line through it, reminding everyone ehat the prov- ing ground of this parlicular sport is cily property -- and skating is pro- biblied. Before iong, a uniformed cop appears -- and with practiced skill, the skateboarders bolt. The officer wanders over to a nearby Irash bin, opens Ihe- side door, and slams it shut: He's looking, he later explains, for skateboards that the scofflaws may have been trying to hide. If they're caught in the act, the skaters can be issued citations and fined as rtiuch as $70. Sometimes, police records show, the equipmeal is confiscated -- in apparent viola- lion of both SFPD regulations and federal law. Occasionally, the skaters refuse to cooperale or rack up repeat offenses and wind up get- ting arrested. The Watt buch Justin Herman Plaza has been a popular skaleboarding spot for the past tO y~rs. But the city paid lit- tle official attention until 1988, when the Recrealion and Parks Commission voted to ban skating on the silt. According to the min- utes from the commission meeting of June 16, 1988, Rec-Park staffer Ron deLeon told commissioners that "skateboarding has dramatical- ly increased in the past year, and there have been many complaints and cases of personal injury to park patrons and skateboarders." ll's hard to find much evidence of widespread personal injuries, bul it's easy lo find complaints: The Hyatt and Ihe Embarcadero Center pushed for the Roe-Park ban, and shortly after il passed, they began paying Ihe Police Department under the city's "I0-B Program" to send officers to enforce the anti- skaleboarding law. The I0-B Program, dating back to 1978, allows private businesses to hire off-duty cops and pay them at overtime rates. Among other things, it's a way for merchants to convince the police to enforce laws that normally wouldn't bca high priority -- like the ban on skate- boarding in a public park. Sgt. Mike Thompson, who oversees the program at the police dcpartment's Central Station, Iold the Bay Guardian that the cops hadn't been patrolling .Ihc plaza regularly "until [lhc Hyalt and Embarcadero joined] he GUARDIAN GRA,I~NtC BY 'GRANGER DAVIS 10-B Program." to Sgl. Thompson, if the skater cited To officials at the Hyatt and the is a juvenile, he or she is directed' to Embarcadero Center, and to Ihe report tothc Youth Guidance Center cops who patrol lhe area, the skaters and appear before a judge. If the arc unruly thugs Thompson Iold skater is an adult, he or she can pay the Bay Guardian, "The skaters are lhe citation by mailing it in. The militant and verbal." An officer at citations range from $70 to $100. Central Station who asked not to be Skaters complain that thoro's a named responded even more blunt- further punishment: Often, they say, ly to a question about skateboard- the cops confiscate their skateboards ing: "How's this for an answer," he and refuse 1o return them until the said. "1 hate it." citation is paid. Thompson insisted Another officer who patrols that the only time equipment is Justin Herman Plaza regularly on seized is when a skater is arrested: the IO-B Program told the Bay He said he is "not aware of any Guardian that the skaters are police officers confiscating skate- "punks and hoodlums." He insisted boards without making fan arrest] that workers at the ice-skaling rink, report and booking it as evidence." which was set up in the plaza at However, the incident logs con- Christmastime, had constant prob- tradict that claim. In 4 of the 47 lems with the skaters. citation cases, the reports show, However, when the Bay Guard- skateboards were confiscated from inn approached "Anthony" -- the people who were simply cited. supervisor of the Ice Guards, who That, Public Defender Jeff Brown supervised the temporary ice rink told the Bay Guardian, seems Io be -- he disagreed. "They keep to a clear violation of law. "You can'l Ihemselves, especially Ihis year," he confiscate anything under the said. "They're profly mellow." he said. "tt's a violation of duc In fact, it's hard to find any hard process. An arrest must be made evidence thai the skateboarders are and then the property can be creating a law enforcement prob- booked as evidence." lem. Pclcr Ashworth, assistant executive manager of rooms at the SIftersr tOtNil Hyatt, told the Bay Guardian that the hotel gets nightly noise com- Kent Uyehara, skateboard advocate plaints due to the skaters. "They and owner of FTC Skate Shop, told hang out in groups and are intimi- the Bay Guardian that skating in daling," he said, insisting Ihat some San Francisco will continue Io of his guests have been knocked grow. "San Francisco has always over and employees beaten up by been really popular for skating the skalers. for at least 15 years," he said. However, Ashworth refuscd to About 20 percent of Ihc film provide the Bay Guardian with any footage for the 20 to 30 new sk,4te evidence to s.upport those corn- videos that come out every ycari is plaints. He said the hotel had a file filmed at Justin Herman Plaza, he ful~ of documents, but he wouldn't estimates. release them. "If Ihere's a case," he There aren't many places 1o said, "I'm not going to try it in your skate that offer the topography that paper." lhe EMB has become famous for. A Bay Guardian review of Justin Herman Plaza has several pol ice records revealed no coasts- stone structures -- steps, a concave tent patlern of violence or injuries wall, and a fountain -- thai are linked to skateboarders at Juslin ideal for the tricks and stunIs that Herman Plaza. Several years ago, a make up street skating. "We can woman suffered a broken ankle after get gnarly here," said one skater a collision with a skater who had sporting jeans and a Thrasher lost control of his board. But that sweatshirt. appears to be a rare exception: Thoro's also the cultural tie- Despite repeated Bay Guardian meat. As Sgt. Rich Frost, who is no requests, nobody at Central Station longer at Central Station, explains or the police Public Affairs Office the situation: "Basically this is could produce records advertised worldwide as being showing any serious greatest place to skate. It's like crimes linked to the Justin being a Muslim and going to a Herman skateboarders over mecca." ihe past two years. Former skater and skateboa~'d Ycl the police advocate Ricky Wright has come who work for the up with a plan for compromise. Hc Hyatt and the Erabar- proposes lhal the kids bc allowed to cadero remain busy. skate at Justin Herman Plaza duri,ag According to inci- specific times -- on weekends and dent logs, police after 6 p.m. on weekdays, for issued 47 citations and example -- when most of the made II arrests during office workers have left and Ihe the month of December 1993 plaza is reinlively quiet. -- almost all for illegal skate- In December, when lhc Bay b o a r d i n g. Guardian spoke to Tom Sapp, an Accord- aide to Supervisor Sue Bierman, he i n g said the supervisor responded poSi- tively to Wright's suggestions, say- ing that setting aside specific times and perhaps a designated arcs would eliminate cause for concern from other parties. Yet when the Bay Guardian spoke with Bierman in April, the supervisor denied lhal she knew anything about the prob- lem in the EMB. She did go on to say that "it would be helpful if people had a place and time to skate." However, MO$AIQUE 1908 FlaRE .ST. AT BUSH I 415.673.1970 , ~ MON.+SAT'H'T SUN'I2'S ~J,~C,~.A. It-,,,.~ e~%~t.pLc M.~,."m~'g4 ~lelTllllllllr&Tallklllltlvlll~;llrlillkle&Talll!~qll!*llr'~ ['.-'T,3LD'S G Y': 6 t A BEAUTIFUL BODY IS HARD TO MAKE WE DO BETTER WORK OUT FREE* Bring in this ad to see why our gym is San Franciso's 1st and only serious gym. 0 T~'i~, OPEN ~~ ~ ~n Fmnci~ : 3~ V~encia St. 62~ POUCE .Fro,. I,~e J 9 the B~y ~uardian obtained a letxer from Pdck7 Wright soot to him by Supervisor Bierman dated Sept. 1993. The letter stated, 'It is dis- Iressing to think that these young people are being harassed for thin activity, and I hope it stops." The letter went on to say, "1 think the~e should be a place for skmeboardets at Justin Herman Plan." Tom Sapp, Bierman's aide, said that several inquiries have been made regarding the skateboarders, and that after the holidays they ., would be able to look mote closely at the situation. "They have to skate somewhere," said Sapp. "There should be a happy medium between frioods and foes." But, to date, no timber meetiug or discus- sion has taken place regarding skateboarding in Justin Herman Plaza. Supervisor Carole Migden's aide, Dana Van Gorder, met with Wright in early Decumber to dis- cuss the proposal and noted that skateboards can damage the plaza, chipping the bricks and leaving wheel marks along the walls. Van 'Coral Sloan; te-o~tn~ $Retel'On'~.~ Heiiptt, bee come up with · cme~l~ way to learate buslees ef~d pmWs~ the police creekdown aLlhe eame.~ time. Skateboarders whd, have had,i Kl, sipflTelt confiscated ca~ bdr4 their citations to Skates On I~.al&ht, and Slosh Wl rsp4sce boards .%iith band- new SOH w~od boarde rNJull $70, 6r , 8OH slick BOIRll for. li'g s,.~..l.illme,:" price ae the ticket.' T~&{ way, expisira, the skaters pay Mr (not the .cRy), get · new board -- end ' hetO*edfi~ltgUle,eJ '.?*: J: ' ' ,. :.,:..a.. . ,... , .' ,.I,t..; .... "That was the way he made all the skaters see him as their champi- on," said Powell, whose Poweli- Peralia company was a leader in the 1980s, skateboaniing's halcyon days. 'Steve's big ploy was to take apart the opposition by tearing apart their promotional teams." Rocco did not return numerous phone calls to Big Brother of~c~ for this article. The man industry insiders regarded as the most mainstream and socially responsible of these major magazine figures is Balms, who spoke to th~ Bay Guardian in a telephone interview. None of his companies have the visibility in skateboarding that Vitello's and Rocco's have. That, industry observers say, is in part because Balms has taken the focus of his editorial space away from p~mhintl his pfodud and used it to document the beauty of and evoots in skate- born'cling and snowboarding. No ads from Vitello's oompeti- rive High Speed Productions have appeared in Balma's TransWorld Skateboarding, but the magazine, which has a circulartun of around 150,000, has nm features on stars who skata f¢~ the comp~ririon. 'ff they're skaters and ax~ wor- thy of having an article about them, th=y'll have un~," Balms said. Whoo asked to list the oompa- hies he owns, Balms paused for several seconds and then asked why this story was being done, list (see sidebar, page 18). The enttepreneux refused to give his age. 0te did say that he hat; worked early 1970s.) Balms said ll'mt all of the companies he's involved with retain the personalities of the skatem that share intact in them. He als6 said it is important that be remain low-key about his involve- ment so as not to destroy in the eyes of young customers the image of where the boarda and clothing come from. 'There's a consumer out there who in his early teen years really warns to ideatilT with [a product]," hasaid. "Ifit'spmofoneccrpore- rioB, then maybe it's not so heaL" ~llll~r$ ~lld Fausto Viiclio met with a Bay Guardian reporter recently at one of his Hunters Point warehouses. Trim and distinguished, with a thick mustache, he sat on the floor of a small office. On chahs to his left were Don Fisher, 31, and Keith Cochrane, 28, two shareholders in Think skateboards. They spoke in earnest tones about their belief in the company, their empathy for skaters, and all that being pros did for them. Cochtane and Fisher, both of whom turned pro after finishing high school, tell stories about how they urge young skatem to stay in school, how they sent money directly to one shatet's mothor to pay her telephone bill, and how when they have sons -- female pros are a rarity -- they'd like them to bo pw skaters. 'It made me an individmdist," Cochrane said. 'He [my son] would have that time when he had his own spotlight." Vitello pointed to Fisher and Cocin'ane us an example of how, with are run by other people, his 'I've boon eccosed of thla [phy- ing a dominant wle in the indusW/] for yeats and years, and I stand on my record," he said. 'I'm not in contwl of all this stuff like people thinklain." Cochnme added: 'I don't really appreciate being called a flunky. I nan this company [Think]. I sign Gordar argued that the city's Open Spaco Advisory Board should Fred another attractive spot for skating. But Wright is dubious: "Due to budget eonstninis ... the City and County of San Francisco would not be in a fiscal position to fund a new skate-park set aside for the youth of our city as an alternative to involvement in gangs, drugs, or crime," he said. Meanwhile, the skateboarders face a thr~t that could pwve mote serious than the police: The Port Commission is doing a study that could lead to a complete overhaul of the Embarcadero area -- includ- ing dramatic changes in Justin Herman Phtza. Skateboarding actually encour- ages a certain mount of tourism. The majority of the skaters who were interviewed for this article were not from San Francisco; they had come from somepisce else to be able to skate the EMB. FTC Skate Shop owner Uyehara says that, especially during the summer, his store is filled with families from all over who visit in part to aBow their children to skate -- and some were actually staying in the Hyett because of its close proximi- ty to the EMB. · the checks." Nevertheless, Viiclio admits that he has a financial stake in Think ood in numerous other companies (see sidebat, page 18), and that he provided the capital to help set Cochtane and Fisher up in busi- ness. He insisted that many kids have done well as professional skaters -- Cochrane and Fisher are two good examples -- and said there was no need fec industry serf'regu- lation. "It's just like surfmg," he said. "There have been attempts to sign contracts, but skatem just pick up and leave." When Run Bertino and Joyante Turner, two skaters who Vitello said don't have high school diplomas, are mentioned, he In[ks about the resourcefulness of skaters. 'Nowadays, the sport's dealing with a lot of urban kids who are s-tl~Rwi~,' Viiclio said. "They are young men, but the majority of them are already used to making Stacey Peralut, who has seen the professional skating experience from the perspective of both the young athlete and the company owner, says it is up to those in the indusU7 who care about their sport to incense the number of ontcom~; like those of Cochnne and Fisher, and to lessen the out-of-control aspect. Perhaps the more corrupt aspects of the skateboarding indus- try can in the funue be brought into check by serf-regulation, just as the Screen Actors Guild influences Hol- 13nvood and state commL~.~ions mun- 'It'S an incredible experience, and it can con~pt a kid instead of making him great," Pera[ta said. "The industO' is a machine and it cannot succeed without having a good team. ~Since they can't survive without each other, they owe something to " ' i:!:.:.': here in good 'ol Rancho C:ucamonga.[towever, it has not yet been decided if we are going to move there, ooen a small warehouse ~4~:~ skatepark or both Thi.s will be all Figured out by the time most of you r'ead tl~is. ~;..~..... :, It seems that our present landlord ~didn't realize that people would be riding their various skate vehicles to the shop. Apparently, the obvious escapes some people. BLAST SKATE has ,received no complaints from our present neighbors, but its best to go where one is '~elcome. RUSSIA ! t The international Goodwill Games has in. vited th~ Skateboard" League to compete thi ~ ..s .in Moscow. BLAST SKATE 'is Planing to send 3 teamriders: captain .Jim West fall, resident Powerhouse Rob Palmet', and Berkeley team captain Dakh. Its -"k ~hoped that these 9u~s and othe~'s like them will help show the ~ ~::)~wortd that most skaters are decent human beings. BLAST Plans on (' ',: droppin0 the bomb on Russia. CON~ES~S After years of' viewing s~a~eboardir~g as a nuisance, ~he ci~ of Rancho Cuca~onga has given us a chance to prove ouTselves. · he Calif. AmaLeu~ SkaLeboard League w~ll be holdin~ ~e con- LesLs here in Lhe Badl~ncls. (one has already happened~ ~he nexL CASL event will b~ held at tl~e Ouakes stadium m-~ Oc[. BkAS~ for ~nforma~ion. ..... :~:~ ~ayhem aL ~lonk'.~ ~3 w~l] be held June ~8 in ~oa~ana on ~ichard ~onk*s new 6f~ min~ halfpipe. ~';, skate ga~heFing a~ ~Iitch Wadley's. Date Lo be ~nnounc~d. · :~ VerL con~es~. Don ~ be frightened ea~hli~gs. Big excitement at Jimmy Gcn-~zales' pad scheduled for .July ~. Fontaria is the place. x~ More events will be announced. ,f ,, ~.. - GR4']'ITUDE ~ · ' · ~Iany thanks to all those who helped with the Cucamonga and , Temecula CASL events. ~Iany BLAST team members worked up much ~ .s~eat and got real dir'~y so t. hat others could ez~joy the fruits ~ .:' of that [abet. We are fortunate to r~ave so ma~v g~d people ~ ': who are willing to do so muc'h. ' . i For those who don't know BLAST provides free service for ~ assembly and repair nf skateboards, rollerblades, skates, and any :,.'.' "' other rolling contraptions. -. .,-, ~ ~.' ~ -. ' ' ' ....' ' "' , B[ AST 'ZINE ~7 ,= "~ ' The famous BLAST 'ZINE will breathe life once again in about ,3 weeks. Send or bFinQ in an:~ contributions of anV type here at the shop. ?'- What skateshcp is 'c]aimirx~.4 responsibilit~ for getting Cucamonga ~ to allow skate contests..° Isn't it better to, work together ir~-- stead of atkemptin~ to "steal the thu~,der"? ~ Do BLAST riders really l~ak'e .their own litterboxes? · Are Pr'ettV clothe,s ank1 primpeal hair the sign of hard work? ,'~ · , ~ i t an honor- whe[~ a fog l makes ft,n (', f you? ~BLASF.. -Dominatin~ the Inlam:l b:mpir-e skate scene fop over hal f a decade. <909 ~ 980 -956'3 City of Berkeley Healfl~ and Human Services Department Youth Commission Martin Luther King, Jr. Civic Center Building 2180 Milvia Street Berkeley, Califomia 94704 (510) 644-6226 YOUTH COMMISSIONJPARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION SKATEBOARD PARK SUB-COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES Saturday April 30, 1994 11:00 a.m. No. Berkeley Senior Center 1901 Hearst Avenue Berkeley, California 94704 CAI~ TOORDFR The meeting was called to order at 11:20 a.m. Members Present: David Michael Ruddy, Guy Saltmarch, Paul Grogmm., Nic Wiborg, Kingman Lim, Kingston Lim, Genji ILim, Mike Veneziano, Barry Fike, Kerry Hegarty On Saturday, April 30, 1994, the Skateboard Park Sub-Committee of the Youth Commission and Parks & Recreation Commission held its 2nd meeting. Though turnout was low due to the fact that flyers were not distributed. We did have a number of new people attend. We went over the minutes from the previous meeting and added new items of concern. A. NEW ISSUES PRFSI=NTED , City Insurance and Liability Break down of sites Mr. Harry Lim volunteered his services to do a design. Mr. Lim is also an architect and estimates that it would take $40,000/$50,000 to design and build a skateboard park. It was agreed upon by those who attended that we hold another meeting on Wednesday, May 11, 1994, and that Kerry Hegarty will get a room at BHS for us. Philip L. Harper-Cotton will meet with Kingston Lira to produce flyer and questionnaire to pass out to the youth. At our next meeting, we will continue our discussion and focus our efforts on design and four sites. Telecommunications Device for the Deaf (510) 644-6915 City of Berkeley Health and Human Services Department Youth Commission Martin Luther King, Jr. Civic Center Building 2180 Milvia Street Berkeley, California 94704 (510) 644-6226 JOINT YOUTH COMMISSION/PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION SKA TEBOARD PARK SUB-COMMITTEE MINUTES Wednesday May 11, 1994 3:30 P.M. Berkeley High School, Rm. C-327 2246 Milvia Street Berkeley, CA 94704 Youth in Attendance Aaron Terteling, Jalgres Horn, Robert Santiago, Lisa Casa, Bakh Piasenue, Nic Wiborg, James Sousa, David Michel-Ruddy, Sorell Tsui, Kerry Hegarty, Toby Magree, Marcus Solomon. Site Fly Priority (a) Oholone Park, (b) Cedar Rose Park, (c) Live Oak Park, (d) Aquatic Park Insurance & liability No response from City Attorney's Office Mr. Harry Lim was not present at meeting. Recommendation To Youth Commission/Parks & Recreation Commission None at this time. More youth need to attend these meetings. Telecommunications Device for the Deaf (510) 644-6915 City of Berkeley Health and Human Services Department Youth Commission Martin Luther King, Jr. Civic Center Building 2 t 80 Milvia Street Berkeley, California 94704 (510) 644-6226 JOINT YOUTH COMMISSION/PARKS RECREATION COMMISSION SKA TEBOARD PAR?<: SUB-COMMITTEE AGENDA Wednesday May 25, 1994 3:30 P.M. Berkeley High School, Rm C-327 2246 Milvia Street Berkeley, CA 94704 2. 3. 4. SITES RECOMMENDATION TO JOINT COMMISSIONS DESIGN INSURANCE & LIABILITY Telecommunications Device for the Deaf (510) 644-6915 DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM June 1, 1994 Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil 02i ' REQUEST REMOVAL AGENDA JUNE 1, 1994 ITEM C-11 FROM COUNCIL Item C-11 - "Approval to execute an Agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and General Dynamics Corporation ..." - Request this item be removed from the agenda. This request is based upon the City Attorney's advice that this item does not require City Council authorization. WjO:dlw OUKE/BECKY LIAO 6,~6 SO. SAN GABRIEL BLVD. PASADENA, CA 91107 SURE KARE MANACEve, a' May 19, 1994 Mr. Sam Pellegrino Sam's Place 6620 Carnelian Avenue Alta Loma, California 91701 Dear Sam: The Rancho Plaza Partnership has reviewed the parking lot situation as dictated by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. They are willing to abide by this situation to accommodate you until September 17, 1994 when your Lease expires. However, you must remove these chains during the normal daytime business hours, which means it will be necessary for you to remove these chains at your closing time and not put them up again until 9:00 p.m. At the present time, these are restricting parking for the other tenants during their business hours and the Center's services are being hindered. The parking lot sweeper, trash pick-up, and electrical service, are unable to do the works they are being paid to do; this is unacceptable, not only to the tenants, but also to the service people. Again, please remove these chains as we are requesting or we will seek other remedies to accomplish the task. Thank you for your cooperation and should you have any questions, please feel free to contact our office. Sincerel , . nb Copies 'to Rancho Plaza Partnership 1698 WES~N~ ~T~ET ~ ~~F~NIA 91 7~'.'PHONE: (~9) 920-4181 · FAX (9~) 920-4186 BACKGROUND * MARKS PURCHASED DCA CABLEVISION ABOUT 2 YEARS AGO. * PURCHASED SIMMONS CABLE IN NORTH RANCHO AND CHAMBERS CABLE IN SAN BERNARDINO ON FEBRUARY 1, 1994 * OVER 30 YEARS CABLE EXPERIENCE * OWNED AND OPERATED SYSTEMS IN FLORIDA, TEXAS, OHIO, ARKANSAS, NORTHERN CALIFORNIA AND THE UNITED KINGDOM. OUR COMMITMENT 'TO RANCHO CUCAMONGA * $50 MILLION INVESTED IN COMMUNITY - FIBER OPTICS - 61 CHANNELS - STATE-OF-THE-ART ADDRESSABLE CONVERTER BOXES - PAY-PER-VIEW THROUGHOUT THE CITY - DIGITAL MUSIC SERVICE * FINANCIAL BENEFITS TO CITY - FRANCHISE FEES- OVER $375,000 ANNUALLY COMMUNITY ACCESS FEES - OVER $20,000 ANNUALLY MARKS CableVision Employee Schedule Rancho Cucamonga & North San Bernardino Department Number of Employees Corporate 3 General & Administrative 26 Field & Technical 18 Engineering 2 Construction 27 Sales 24 Advertising 8 Staff 2 110 CSG CABLE DATA ISD CONVERTER ROLLOUT 2,000 HEAD END ACC 200 N.RCO OFFICE D1 Data L'n Voice Line ACC400 HEAD END S.B.O. OFFICE DATA LINE ---~ 8,000 CONVERTER ROLLOUT FIBER OPTIC CABLE 5,000 CONVERTER ROLLOUT S. RCO OFFICE REBUILD HEAD END DATA LINES FIBER OPTIC CABLE ADDRESSABLE CONVERTER BOX CAPABILITIES / FUNCTIONS PAY-PER VIEW ON-SCREEN DISPLAY MENU * PARENTAL CONTROL- Password Feature * FAVORITE CHANNEL PROGRAMMING * VCR TIMER CHANNEL I.D. STATUS - Channel name - Current time and date - Indication of what features are activated * ON CHANNEL VOLUME DISPLAY * SLEEP TIMER * ON/OFF TIMER * DISPLAY MESSAGING * SPECIFIC AREA MESSAGING * OPINION POLL CAPABILITIES CRITICAL PATH JUNE * CHANNEL LINEUP CONSOLIDATION · CONVERTER BOX ROLL-OUT (SOUTH AND NORTH) * CONSTRUCTION JULY * NEW OFFICE LOCATION TERRA VISTA TOWN CENTER * CONSTRUCTION AUG. * FIBER OPTIC INTERCONNECT * COMMUNICATION WITH CITY - DAILY CONTACT BOTH WRITTEN AND VERBAI,LY WITH CITY STAFF * COMMUNITY SERVICES - FREE SERVICE TO SCHOOLS - CABLE IN THE CLASSROOM - CHAFFEY COLLEGE (FALL 1994) - SEMI-ANNUAL COVERAGE OF LDS (LATTER DAY SAINTS) CONFERENCE AND OTHER DENOMINATIONS - GRAFFITI REMOVAL - ONLY HIRE EMPLOYEES LOCALLY - SUPPORT QUAKES BASEBAI~L D T H E ANCHO C T Y N F A June 2, 1994 The Honorable Robert R. Nolan City of Upland 460 No. Euclid Avenue Upland, California 91786 Dear Mayor Nolan: As a follow up to the May 26, 1994 Route 30 meeting the City of Upland arranged, I would like to clarify a portion of the minutes that were forwarded to the Route 30 Discussion Participants. In the Summary portion of the minutes under the section entitled, "Other Points Raised" it states "the Route 30 Forum was expected to be the Forum for discussion of major points such as funding and sequencing, but has not been used for that purpose and is not organized to do so. It is presently organized to address aesthetics." To clarify this statement, I wanted to again state as I did at the May 26, 1994 meeting that the Route 30 Forum was not organized for the purpose of addressing funding or sequencing issues. The purpose of the Route 30 Forum was to bring together all the cities along the Route 30 corridor to a neighborly review and discussion of the major highway design elements such as maps, signs, landscaping, sound wall design etc. and to discuss future maintenance issues of the corridor. As you may be aware, currently the Route 30 Forum has asked the participating cities along the corridor to consider formalizing their participation through a Joint Powers Agreement to administer a consolidated program of design and maintenance along the Route 30 corridor. As a staff liaison for the Route 30 discussions for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, I believe it is SANBAG's Major Projects Standing Subcommittee's responsibility to review and recommend to the entire SANBAG Board of Directors items pertaining to funding and sequencing relative to Route 30. SANBAG's Major Projects Subcommittee has always stated their meetings are open to all SANBAG Boardmembers, the public, Mayor Dennis L. Stout ,Ma,/or Pro-Tern Charles J. Buauet II Jack Larn, AICP. City Manager Counctlmernlser William J. Alexanaer Councfirnernlger Diane ',Viiijams CouncilmernOer Rex Gutterfez ~3~G0 2. c Te~'er 2t,ve P ~D Box ~07 ~ar',cno Cuc3"' :~ :~ ~--' ~1729 ~909/989-Ie51 :A× ,909. 987-~4~;o Mayor Robert R. Nolan June 2, 1994 Page Two CALTRANS Districts 7 and 8, and representatives. from Los Angeles County's Transportation Commission. The City of Rancho Cucamonga appreciates the opportunity to continue to participate in meetings relative to Route 30 and I look forward to working with you and the City of Upland. S nce ickGol z o,mmu lopment Director Enclosure: City of Upland's May 31, 1994 Correspondence CC: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Wes McDaniel, Executive Director SANBAG Gary Moon, Program Manager SANBAG CITY OF UPLAND "The Civy of Grc|cious Living" Post-It' brand fax transmittal memo 7671 o.p.. ~..o, F.., May 3 l, 1994 '""' f,/,~,/~ ~'~ Dear Route 30 Discussion Pasticipants: Please accept my personal thanks for your taking time from your busy schedules to attend the meeting on May 26 at the City of Upland regarding Route :10. I hope we all better understand the Route 30 sequencing and funding issues as a result ofthis meeting. The minutes reflect several proposed solutions to help assure that the development of the Route 30 Freeway occurs in the most logical sequence, from west to east. Upland is very eommhted to continuing to do everything in its power to assure that the westerly portion or Route 30, and ultimately the entire route, will be constructed at the earnest pos.u'ble time. As the proposed solutions suggest, we will work actively to coordinalc the hitcrests of both San Bcrnasdino and Los Angeles Counties to re-?u,e the construction of this long awajted and much needed freeway route. Respectfully, Robert R. Nolast. Mayor City of Upland jh .MAY--:~I--94 TUIE 16:55 P.ta2 SUMMARY OF ROUTE 30 FUNDING SEQUENCING nlSCUSSION Meeting held 3:00 p.m., May 26, 1994, in Upland City Library Multipurpose Room. The goals for the meeting were established as being: 1) that we expedite building the whole freeway at the earliest possible time. 2) that we optimize options for funding and construction sequencing, that we identify concerns regarding the current major proiects proposed sequencing. Upland has concerns about the freeway sequencing as proposed by SANBAG staff including the fact that the Measure I funding Is going to the eastern section of the freewoy where traffic volumes are less than on the western side; and. that opening parts of the freeway could substantially increase already unacceptable surface street traffic. The indefinite programming of STIP funds could cause this unacceptable situation to persist for many years. One point made clear through the discussion was that the L.A. Segment 2 lack of funding was the major reason for using the first dollars available In San Bernardino County to build the east side, rather than the west. It was also noted that, while the S.B. County portion will be opened as built, tile L.A. County portion including the San Bernardino County portion through tO Hermosa Avenue, would be opened at the same time. Another point of consensus was that if Measure I money was moved to build the western San Bernardino County portion, there would be close to enough dollars to accomplish that. Other points 1) 2) raised included: The Route 30 forum was expected to be the forum for discussion of major points such as funding and sequencing, but has not been used for that purpose and is not organized to do so. It is presently organized to address aesthetics. That there needs to be better coordination and team work between Los Angeles County and San Bernardino County regarding mutual interests. That L.A. County may be able to use some HOV money from their Measure A and C to comiclets L.A. Segment 2. The organization CLOUT could be used to communicate the status and the concerns about Route 30. 5) 1997 starts a new funding cycle for ISTEA, which could be 8 source for the completion of the Route 30 Freeway. 6) First new transportation dollars in L.A. County will go to L.A. Segment 2 just as new San Bernardino County dollars will go to completion of the unfunded portions of Route 30 in San 8ernardino County. 7) When freeways are opened with gaps, traffic on the surface streets will rise dramatically and signage will be an important consideration to controlling traffic. Proposed solutions include: 1) Obtaining SANBAG approval to challenge L.A. County that, if L.A. Segment 2 funding could be committed In the near future, San Bernardino County would use Measure I money to build the western connecting section- 2) That both L.A. County and San Bernardino County CALTRANS, regional government, and City Officials need to work to level Out the funding and move towards 8 more simultaneous Construction and opening sequence. 3} That more time is necessary for input On both sides of the County border before a decision Is made on the significant issues affecting the long awaited Route 30 construction. it was also noted that the SANBAG Board will be reviewing the strategic plan including the Route 30 Project sequencing at its meeting of June 1, 1994, but will not take action until the July 6, 1994, meeting. The Major Projects Committee will consider comments at their meeting of June 16o 1994. It was suggested that cities may wish to adopt resolutions supporting the above positions and/or attend the SANBAG meetings to express their support for those issues. This information is being sent to all those registered at the May 26, 1994. meeting.