The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2020-06-24 Agenda Packet - PC-HPCHistoric Preservation Commission and Planning Commission Agenda June 24, 2020 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 7:00 p.m. PURSUANT TO GOVERNOR GAVIN NEWSOM'S EXECUTIVE ORDER N-29-20 THIS MEETING WILL BE HELD AS A TELECONFERENCE MEETING In response to the Governor's Executive Orders, the San Bernardino County Department of Public Health requirements, and to ensure the health and safety of our residents by limiting contact that could spread the COVID- 19 virus, there will be no members of the public in attendance at the Planning Commission Meetings. Members of the Planning Commission and staff will participate in this meeting via teleconference. In place of in -person attendance, members of the public can observe and offer comment at this meeting via Zoom: VIEW MEETING VIA ZOOM APP OR ZOOM.COM AT: zoom.us/join using Webinar ID: 817-5948-7168 .or - YOU CAN DIAL -IN USING YOUR PHONE UNITED STATES: + 1 (669) 900-6833 Access Code: 817-5948-7168 A. Call to Order and Pledge of Allegiance B. Public Communications This is the time and place for the general public to address the Commission on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. The Commission may not discuss any issue not included on the Agenda but set the matter for a subsequent meeting. C. Consent Calendar C1. Consideration to adopt Regular Meeting Minutes of June 10, 2020. D. Public Hearings D1. DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2018-00992, ZONING MAP AMENDMENT DRC2018-00994, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT20148, DESIGN REVIEW DRC2018-00770, TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2019-00867 AND UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM 2019-00959 — SC WESTBURY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP — A request for site plan and architectural review of a mixed -use development with 131 residential units, 4 commercial ready units and a 1,500- square foot commercial space that includes a tentative tract map for condominium purposes, a request to amend the text and figures related to mixed use development in the Development Code, a Zoning Map amendment to change the zoning from Community Commercial (CC) to Mixed Use (MU), a Tree removal permit to remove 32 trees and a Uniform Sign Program for onsite signage on a 11.44 acre project site in the Community Commercial (CC) District, located on the west side of East Avenue and north of Foothill Boulevard — APN: 1100-191-04. A Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts has been prepared for consideration. E. General Business F. Director Announcements G. Commission Announcements H. Workshops -None I. Adjournment If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at (909) 477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. After speaking, please complete a speaker card located next to the speaker's podium. It is important to list your name, address (optional) and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under "Public Comments." There is opportunity to speak under this section prior to the end of the agenda. As an alternative to participating in the meeting you may submit comments in writing to Elizabeth.Thornhill(a)-cityofrc.us by 12:00 PM on the date of the meeting. Written comments will be distributed to the Commissioners and included in the record. AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are available at www.CitvofRC.us. APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of $3,114 for all decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). Please turn off all cell phones while the meeting is in session. Planning Commission Agenda — June 24, 2020 Page 2of3 I, Elizabeth Thornhill, Executive Assistant of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on Thursday, June 18, 2020, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. Planning Commission Agenda — June 24, 2020 Page 3 of 3 PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES JUNE 103 2020 A. Call to Order The meeting of the Historic Presentation Commission and Planning Commission was held on June 10, 2020. The meeting was called to order my Chairman Guglielmo at 7:12pm. Planning Commission present: Chairman Guglielmo, Vice Chair Oaxaca, Commissioner Dopp, Commissioner Morales, and Commissioner Williams. Staff Present: Nick Ghirelli, Assistant City Attorney; Anne McIntosh, Planning Director; Mike Smith, Principal Planner; Elizabeth Thornhill, Executive Assistant; Brian Sandona, Sr. Civil Engineer; Jana Cook, Manager Community Improvement; Dat Tran, Assistant Planner; David Eoff, Sr. Planner. B. Public Communications Chairman Guglielmo opened the public communications and hearing no comment, closed public communications. C. Consent Calendar C1. Consideration to adopt Regular Meeting Minutes of May 27, 2020 Two minor spelling corrections; Change Perish to Parish. Change arena to RHNA. Motion by Commissioner Morales, second by Vice Chair Oaxaca. Motion carried 5-0 to adopt the amended minutes. D. Public Hearings D1. Consideration to Amend the Municipal Code for the Regulation of Short -Term Rentals. This Item Will Be Forwarded to City Council for Final Action. Jana Cook, Manager Community Improvement, presented Commissioners with a Staff Report and oral presentation (copy on file). Commissioner Dopp requested clarification on the two rental agreements; does it mean they could rent out their home on certain weekends and then a room on a regular basis. Jana Cook answered yes. Although, this would not apply to long-term home sharing. If there were three or more people, that would fall under boarding house definition. Other than that, they are just roommates. This is just short-term rental people coming in for a few days/ weeks and then leaving. HPC/PC Meeting Minutes — June 10, 2020 Page 1 of 5 Draft 004 PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES JUNE 103 2020 Commissioner Dopp asked for clarification on street parking. Is there to be an understanding that street parking will not be allowed. Jana Cook replied we cannot tell people they cannot park on the street, it's a legal place to park. The applicant must show there is parking for guests available on the property prior to a permit being issued. Commissioner Williams asked how do we expect to have people abide by this. Jana Cook answered the hosting platforms would be prohibited from posting their listing if they do not have a valid permit. She explained the intent is also to keep the costs of the permit negative and a cost summary which will go to Council with the resolution for the fees. It will cost us approx. $250 to do the inspection and permitting because we will be using one of the enforcement platforms and there is costs to that. We will recoup most of that costs while still keeping it down at approx. $150 range. Within just a few nights, hosts will be able to recoup their costs for the permit. It allows us to go in and do those inspections to make sure the area offered for rent is safe for occupancy. Nick Ghirelli, City Attorney mentioned he is not saying the hosting platforms that do this are happy to. It took some litigation involving the City of Santa Monica to determine a City could hold a hosting platform liable for non -complying with the basic requirements the ordinance sets out for making sure they verify the host they are advertising on their platform has actually registered with the City, but we can do that. Anne McIntosh, Planning Director, stated most homeowners want to comply. By providing a permitting system that actually provides people some relief, they will know then it's okay to do it. Jana Cook stated we really want to accommodate our residents who are just doing this for some extra income. We want to accommodate those residents for not negatively impacting their neighbors, but we also have some where they don't live there, and they don't care. We actually had to red tag a house for hazardous patio in the back. It was not safe to stay there. Those are the folks we want to stop what they are doing. Anne McIntosh, stated its counter intuitive but by regulating and allowing certain people to do something, it is easier to catch the people that are not complying. Commissioner Williams mentioned she is a great fan of Airbnb and uses it quite a bit. She really has not given it much thought before but these hosting platforms to the tourists who are looking knowing the house has been inspected and it's determined to be safe is a great comfort. Commissioner Morales asked will the permit renewal process be handled by the City like the other licensing and permit processing are handled. Jana Cook answered yes, those platforms from compliance have a component in their service. The host will go into the City's website click on "want a permit", and it will actually take them over to the other website. They gather all that information for the city and keep a record of it because the 24-hours service because if HPC/PC Meeting Minutes — June 10, 2020 Page 2 of 5 Draft 005 ISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES JUNE 103 2020 the neighbors have a complaint, they can call the 800 number and there is a 24-hour response they can get ahold of an emergency personnel. Business licensing staff will typically handle it, but it will be mostly automated. It will be Community Improvement staff that does the inspection. Chairman Guglielmo asked what enforcement is existing now with the City. Jana Cook answered when there are reports on complaints only, we respond. There are 320 homes operating this and we probably have 10 on our list right now. There are 290 locations that are not offering us any issues. We don't actively go out and look for these at this time, but if there is an issue, we go out and address it at that time but it is very, very hard to prove because they will just change the listing to 30 days and then they are in compliance. There is a lot of game playing. Right now, enforcement is very difficult. Our biggest problem are those vacant properties. Owner does not live there; he is just making money on these. Chairman Guglielmo asked about the rules for this municipal code, did this come from a model of another city, are there other cities in California doing things along these lines. Jana Cook answered that we looked at the problems we are having and addressed those. We looked at a few others and brought in many of their items they had already been successful with. Chairman Guglielmo opened public hearing and after hearing no one, closed the public hearing. Commissioner Oaxaca commented that staff put forth a sensible and reasonable draft ordinance. It answered his question on what problems we are trying to solve, and staff did a great job identifying what those problems are. Fortunately, our beautiful city is not exactly the hot bed for Airbnb listings but it's still an issue and surprised to see there are over 300 listings across the city. He shared the same concerns about the impacts on our community and the absentee landlords and he also did a quick look through the listing on Airbnb earlier today to get a sense and the most that stood out are the listing for entire houses that would accommodate 10-12 guests and those houses only had 3 bedrooms in general and wondered where everyone is sleeping. Those are the kind of things we do need a way to track to insure we are avoiding those issues where we have landlords that don't live in the residents. Forget the fact they cram as many people as they can into their residents, which can also create safety hazards not only for those who occupy the residents but for neighbors as well. He is in support of the proposed ordinance. Commissioner Dopp concurred with Vice Chair Oaxaca and he was surprised to see what is going on out in the Airbnb world. It is clear with technological change we have to change our rules and regulations too. He is a big fan to let property owners have some freedom to do things with their property but it's clear some of the intention with some of these property owners are incompatible with what we want out of neighborhoods, ownership and quality community. HPC/PC Meeting Minutes — June 10, 2020 Page 3 of 5 Draft 006 PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES JUNE 103 2020 When he was looking at the accessory dwelling units, he would like to see, maybe in the future, some sort of recourse where property owners buy a property and there is an accessory dwelling unit attached, but maybe some recourse to allow them some sort of limited short-term rental, they end up adopting a property and want to do something with that. Otherwise they would not have the ability to do under the current regulation. His only minor concern. Commissioner Williams agrees with Commissioner Dopp in a way this is a work in progress and if we get started with it maybe in a year come back and look at it and see how it's going. The accessory units already there, she can see those being very useful income for someone looking for property. Staff did a great job sorting it at out. First steps first with moving ahead with this ordinance. Commissioner Morales agrees we need this ordinance. In his HOA at his residence they have a big problem with rentals having parties. It is almost impossible to track down. Control and regulate across the whole city, is a good solution. The most important thing is this will control and regulate the problem out there and also bring in transient occupancy tax that is due to the city to help reimburse our cost. It's a good ordinance. Chairman Guglielmo echoes it was a great report and stated he was surprised to see 10 occupants with three bedrooms. It comes down to we will have some people that are operating this as a business that might be upset but every hotel will operate under a certain set of rules. Staff did a good job exposing some of those loopholes people operate under. At least it gives the city some more oversite on that to maintain good neighborhoods and positive outlook. Motion by Commissioner Williams, second by Commissioner Dopp to adopt Resolution No. 20-28. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0 vote. E. General Business E1. Mike Smith, Principal Planner mentioned to the Commissioners he will be sending out reminders to them for training to be completed on Cybersecurity. He also shared will be going through the process of selecting new appointments for Trails Advisory Committee, which begins on Monday, June 151h and ending June 30, 2020. We will be accepting applications during this time period. It will be advertised to the public on Monday as well. Anne McIntosh reminded Commissioners about the joint Planning Commission/ City Council Workshop, which is part of our General Plan series, scheduled for next Wednesday, June 171h @ 3:00pm. More information and a packet to come from the City Clerk's Office. HPC/PC Meeting Minutes — June 10, 2020 Page 4 of 5 Draft 007 ISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES JUNE 103 2020 Commissioner Dopp inquired about the virtual event at the end of the month for the General Plan and asked if that would be something the Commissioners should be a part of. Anne McIntosh replied that this is the Future Forum and will occur on June 291" 30t" and July 1st; we are still working on the schedule. This is more of a general public event. There will be a link on the City's website. More information will be provided as well. No need to RSVP. It's a three-day period of some presentations and small group discussions. F. Director Announcements - None G. Commission Announcements - None H. Workshops — None I. Adjournment Motion by Vice Chair Oaxaca, second by Commissioner Morales, to adjourn the meeting; motion carried unanimously, 5-0 vote. Meeting was adjourned at 8:00pm. Approved: Respectfully submitted, Elizabeth Thornhill Executive Assistant, Planning Department HPC/PC Meeting Minutes — June 10, 2020 Page 5 of 5 Draft 008 STAFF REPORT DATE: June 24, 2020 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Planning Director INITIATED BY: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2018-00992, ZONING MAP AMENDMENT DRC2018-00994, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT20148, DESIGN REVIEW DRC2018-00770, TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2019- 00867 AND UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM DRC2019-00959 — SC WESTBURY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP — A request for site plan and architectural review of a mixed -use development with 131 residential units, 4 commercial ready units, and a 1,500-square foot commercial space that includes a tentative tract map for condominium purposes, a request to amend the text and figures related to mixed -use development in the Development Code, a Zoning Map amendment to change the zoning from Community Commercial (CC) to Mixed -Use (MU), a Tree removal permit to remove 32 trees and a Uniform Sign Program for onsite signage on an 11.44-acre project site in the Community Commercial (CC) District, located on the west side of East Avenue and north of Foothill Boulevard —APN: 1100-191-04. A Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts has been prepared for consideration. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission take the following action • Approve Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20148, Design Review DRC2018-00770, Tree Removal Permit DRC2019-00867, and Uniform Sign Program DRC2019-00959 through the adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval with Conditions. Recommend City Council approval of Development Code Amendment DRC2018-00992 and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2018-00994 through the adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval with Conditions. BACKGROUND: The project was reviewed by the Planning Commission at a Pre -Application Workshop on October 11, 2017 (DRC2017-00674). Staff was in support of the project but recommended that the architecture be enhanced by selecting a recognizable architectural design theme. The Planning Commissioners were overall supportive of the project and agreed with staff that a more specific F1• PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR DRC2018-00770 — SC WESTBURY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP June 24, 2020 Page 2 architectural style should be considered and that the project could be more contemporary similar to the project to the south. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: The 11.44-acre project site is located on the west side of East Avenue, approximately 550 feet north of Foothill Boulevard. The project site is made up of 3.76 acres of land unencumbered by easements. Of the remainder of the property, 1.98 acres are within a Southern California Gas Company easement that will be used for parking, and 5.7 acres are within a Southern California Edison easement that will be left undeveloped. The developable portion of the project site is zoned Community Commercial (CC) District and is within the Foothill Boulevard Overlay District (Subarea 4). The dimensions of the generally triangular -shaped property are approximately 685 feet along the south property line, 1,077 feet along the east property line, 385 feet along the west property line, and 970 feet along the northwest property line. The site gently slopes from north to south and is covered by low vegetation and multiple eucalyptus trees. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Utility Corridor Open Space (OS) District Site Vacant Mixed -Use Community Commercial (CC) District; Foothill Boulevard Overlay District Subarea 4 North Utility Corridor Utility Corridor Low Medium (LM) Residential District South Vacant Land Mixed -Use Mixed -Use (MU) District East Single -Family Residences City of Fontana City of Fontana Utility Open Space (OS) District West Infrastructure Utility Corridor Commercial Office (CO) District ANALYSIS: A. General: The project scope is for the development of a two and three-story mixed -use development made up of 131 residential units (73 one -bedroom and 58 two -bedroom units), 4 commercial ready units (305 square feet each), that are attached to one -bedroom residential units and a 1,500-square foot commercial space. The project density calculation is based on the 3.76-acre area of the project site unencumbered by easements and the 1.98-acre Southern California Gas Company easement, to be used to fulfill the parking requirement for the project. The maximum permitted density in the Mixed -Use (MU) District is 50 dwelling units per acre. B. Parking: The project is required to provide 281 parking spaces, 131 of which are required to be provided in the form of a garage or carport. Required parking includes tenant and guest parking for the residential portion of the development, as well as parking for the commercial and commercial ready units. The 1,500 square foot commercial space and the commercial ready units were parked at the office/retail parking rate (1/250 gross square foot). The project HM PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR DRC2018-00770 — SC WESTBURY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP June 24, 2020 Page 3 is required to provide 1 garage/carport parking space for each 1 and 2-bedroom unit, or 131 spaces based on the proposed unit breakdown. The project provides 134 garage parking spaces. One hundred forty-three (143) of the required parking spaces are located on a Southern California Gas Company easement, for which the applicant has received an initial acceptance letter to allow parking within the easement area. The applicant also proposes permitting street parking on the west side of East Avenue, similar to the approved mixed -use project to the south. This will net up to 18 additional parking spaces adjacent to the commercial and commercial ready tenant spaces. The street parking spaces are not counted in the parking analysis below as they are not on the project site. C. Project Entitlements: In addition to the Design Review DRC208-00770 the projects include the following entitlements: 1. Development Code Amendment DRC2018-00992 amends Chapters 17.36 and 17.38 of the Development Code related to the change in zoning of the project site from Community Commercial to Mixed -Use. The amendment will modify Development Code Section 17.36.020 (Development standards for mixed -use zoning districts) to eliminate text, figures, and tables related to defining the location and mix of uses within each mixed -use area within the City. On June 15, 2016, the City Council approved General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00887, which similarly eliminated tables in General Plan which described the uses and development ranges permitted within each area designated for Mixed -Use development. The proposed changes will bring the Development Code into alignment with the General Plan and will provide more flexibility in the development of mixed -use zoning areas. The amendment will also modify Development Code Figure 17.38.060-1 (Foothill Boulevard Subareas) and Figure 17.38.060-15 (Subarea 4 Map) to reflect the proposed zone change. 2. Zoning Map Amendment DRC2018-00994 changes the zoning designation of the project site from Community Commercial (CC) to Mixed -Use (MU). The Zoning Map Amendment will bring the project site into conformance with the General Plan. 3. Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20148 is for the subdivision of the 11.44-acre project site to create one numbered and one lettered lot tentative tract map for condominium purposes. The numbered lot will include the residential/commercial portion of the project site and the lettered lot will include the existing utility easements (including a portion of the parking lot). 4. Tree Removal Permit DRC2019-00867 is for the removal of 32 eucalyptus trees. It has been determined that 32 of the 33 on -site eucalyptus trees are in poor condition due to age, pest infestation, lack of care and maintenance, and other observed structural deficiencies (LSA — November 20, 2017). One mature eucalyptus tree will be preserved in place at the southwest corner of the project site. Uniform Sign Program DRC2019-00959 is to establish a Uniform Sign Program for the development. The sign program contains the location and conceptual design of all signs for the residential and commercial components of the project as well as project monumentation. 91 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR DRC2018-00770 — SC WESTBURY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP June 24, 2020 Page 4 The project is intended to be a rental community that they will own and operate. The commercial -ready lease areas are designed to be used either as commercial space or as a second bedroom for the attached residential units. The 1,500-square foot commercial space is located within the single -story leasing office/recreation building, with the main entrance facing East Avenue. Three-story residential buildings, along with the commercial units will directly face East Avenue. Three-story residential buildings will also form a triangle around a common courtyard at the center of the project site. Two-story carriage units will be located adjacent to the south property line and the Southern California Gas Company easement that runs along the northwest property line. All units will be single -floor flats accessed by exterior staircases or ground level walkways. The recreation/leasing office, commercial space and pool, and spa will be located at the northeast corner of the site. One gated and one ungated vehicle access drive will be provided along East Avenue, with non -gated guest/customer parking provided adjacent to the leasing office and commercial space. The residential units will range in size from 676 to 789 square feet for the 1-bedroom units and 1,021 to 1,174 square feet for the 2-bedroom units. Recreational amenities include a pool and spa, BBQ facilities, clubhouse, fitness room, common open space areas, and multiple sports court areas (volleyball, badminton, bocce ball, horseshoes). A larger triangular -shaped common open space is located at the center of the project site and will include communal seating areas with water features and fire pits. The parking spaces and recreational amenities on the easement area will only be landscaped with shrubs and ground cover, as trees and other permanent structures are not permitted within the Southern California Gas Company easement area. The buildings will have a contemporary architectural design theme that includes the use of horizontal cement board siding, brick veneer, and stucco, along with cable railings and metal sunshades. The building materials are carried to all elevations (360-degree architecture) and each wall plane is well articulated. The private patios/decks range in size from 54 square feet to 100 square feet and each unit includes a minimum of 125 cubic feet of storage area in the garages as well as bicycle parking. A combination of block walls and wrought iron fencing is proposed around the project perimeter, with the main entrance from East Avenue located adjacent to the leasing office. The parking area and recreational amenities within the Southern California Gas Company's easement will not be fenced as structures are not permitted within the easement area. The project site is located adjacent to a Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD) water pumping station. The applicant and the adjacent property owner to the south are working with CVWD to incorporate noise attenuation measures that will reduce the noise levels of the water pumps. A Condition of Approval has been added requiring that the project complies with the related noise limitations and to work with CVWD to provide adequate access to their facility. The project complies with each of the Development Code requirements for the Mixed -Use (MU) Residential District. Projects within mixed -use districts are permitted an up to 75 percent reduction in the streetscape setbacks with no minimum building separation requirements (beyond that required by the Building Code). 012 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR DRC2018-00770 — SC WESTBURY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP June 24, 2020 Page 5 Minimum/ Maximum Proposed Compliant? Requirement Building Setback East Avenue 35 feet* 11 feet-9 Inches Yes Building Setback Side Property 5 Feet 5 Feet Yes Line Height Limit 75 Feet 39 Feet Yes Landscape Coverage 10 Percent 26 Percent Yes Open Space Per Unit 150 Square Feet 364 Square Feet Yes Density 50 Units per Acre 22.58 Units per Yes Acre *Mixed -Use Projects are Permitted an Up To 75 Percent Reduction Parking Analysis Number of Units Square Footage Parking Ratio Required Parking Multi -family units (one bedroom) 73 N/A 1.5 per unit, 1 in garage or carport 110 Multi -family units (two bedrooms) 58 N/A 2 per unit, 1 in garage or carport 116 Visitor parking (multi -family) 131 N/A 1 per 3 units 44 Commercial/Office N/A 1,500 1 per 250 square feet 6 Commercial Ready N/A 1,220 1 per 250 square feet 5 Total Parking Spaces Required 281 Total Parking Spaces Provided 285 Total Parking Spaces on Easement 143 Total Garage Parking Spaces Provided/Required 134/131 Parking Surplus 4 D. Design Review Committee: The project was reviewed by the Design Review Committee (Guglielmo, Williams, and Smith) on February 4, 2020. The Committee raised the following questions related to the project: 1. Whether a vehicle left turn lane will be included into the project and whether the on -street parking was parallel or perpendicular to the curb face; (Staff Response) The street parking spaces will be parallel to the sidewalk. 2. Whether a bike lane is proposed along the west side of East Avenue; (Staff Response) The applicant has provided an illustration that is included in the attached set of plans showing the East Avenue street alignment with a bicycle lane and center median left -turn lane into the project. F8191 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR DRC2018-00770 — SC WESTBURY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP June 24, 2020 Page 6 3. Whether the project provided a tot lot; (Staff Response) The project does not include a tot lot but is within 1/3-mile walking distance of two public parks. 4. Whether there will be trail access to Garcia Park, which is adjacent to the project site. (Staff Response) There is a planned community trail adjacent to the project site, though the project will not be required to install these improvements as trail is not on the project site. The Committee had no significant concerns with the design and the overall project. The Committee recommended that the project move forward as presented to the Planning Commission for final review and approval. E. Neighborhood Meeting: The applicant originally scheduled a neighborhood meeting for March 26, 2020. The meeting was canceled due to the COVID-19 pandemic. A second public notice letter was sent to all property owners within 660 feet of the project site requesting that any comments related to the project be forwarded to the project planner. To date, no comments have been received. F. Public Art: Development Code Section 17.124.020 (Public Art Required) requires that residential developments with 4 or more dwelling units provide public art with a minimum value of $750 per unit and/or $1 per square foot of commercial lease area or pay an in -lieu fee into the City's public art trust fund, equal to the minimum value of the artwork that would other be included in the development project. G. SB18 and AB52 Tribal Consultation: In accordance with SB18, notification was sent on July 2, 2019, to tribal communities from a list of seven tribes provided by the Native American Heritage Commission. Two tribes responded (San Manuel Band of Mission Indians and the Morongo Band of Mission Indians) and requested any cultural studies that were prepared for the studies. The studies were forwarded to the two tribes and no further comment was received. Notification in accordance with AB52 was sent on December 16, 2019, to tribal communities from a list of six tribes that have requested notification by the City. Two tribes responded (San Manuel Band of Mission Indians and Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians-Kitz Nation). The San Manuel Band of Mission Indians requested in writing that language be incorporated into the final CEQA document requiring notification if cultural resources are found. The Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians-Kitz Nation requested that mitigation measures be included in the CEQA documents requiring an on -site tribal monitor during earthmoving actives. The CEQA document prepared for the project reflects the requested language/mitigation measures. H. Environmental Assessment: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQX) and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project was prepared by LSA and was peer -reviewed by First Carbon Solutions, a consultant contracted by the City to review the report. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures related to Biological Resources, Cultural Resources, Hazardous and Waste Materials, Noise, Transportation and Traffic and Tribal Cultural Resources, there would be no substantial 014 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR DRC2018-00770 — SC WESTBURY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP June 24, 2020 Page 7 evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. The mitigation measures that the applicant will be required to comply with will reduce potential impacts to migratory birds, cultural and Tribal cultural resources, and reduce noise impacts during the project's construction, as well as potential impacts that may be created upon operation of the development, such as traffic -related impacts. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. A Mitigation Monitoring Program has also been prepared to ensure implementation of, and compliance with, the mitigation measures for the project. FISCAL IMPACT: The Fiscal Impact Analysis (RSG) prepared for the project determined that the project would provide a net annual recurring impact of $71,591 to the City in the year 2024. New recurring general fund revenues include property taxes, property tax in -lieu, residential derived sales taxes, commercial derived sales taxes, business license fees, and franchise fees. The project proponent will also be responsible for paying one-time impact fees. These fees are intended to address the increased demand for City services due to the proposed project. The following types of services that these impact fees would support include the following: library services, transportation infrastructure, drainage infrastructure, animal services, police, parks, and community and recreation services. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: The project fulfills the City Councils' goal of enhancing the City's position as a premier community in our region. The proposed mixed -use development on a vacant parcel of land will provide much - needed housing as well as commercial uses to serve the local community. The project is also consistent with General Plan Goal LU-2, for the development of attractive infill development that complements surrounding neighborhoods and is accessible to pedestrians, bicycles, transit, and automobiles. The proposed infill development will complement the approved mixed -use development to the south as well as the mix of multi -family and single-family development in the surrounding area. The project site is located within 1/3-mile walking distance of two public parks and is conveniently accessible to pedestrians, bicycles, automobiles and is within walking distance of an active Omnitrans bus line. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing with a regular legal advertisement in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. To date, no comments have been received regarding the project notifications. EXHIBITS: Attachments: Exhibit A - Complete Set of Plans Exhibit B - Pre -Application Staff Report and Minutes (Dated October 11, 2017) Exhibit C - Design Review Comments and Meeting Minutes (Dated February 4, 2020) Exhibit D - Initial Study with Mitigation Monitoring Plan 015 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR DRC2018-00770 — SC WESTBURY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP June 24, 2020 Page 8 Draft Resolution #20-29 Recommending Approval of Development Code DRC2018-00992 Draft Resolution #20-30 Recommending Approval of Zoning Map Amendment DRC2018-00994 Draft Resolution #20-31 of Approval for Tree Removal Permit DRC2019-00867 Draft Resolution #20-32 of Approval for Uniform Sign Program DRC2019-00959 Draft Resolution #20-33 of Approval for Development Review DRC2018-00770 Draft Resolution #20-34 of Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20148 F81r1 al, J Q U m U) LU X W 0 Z - W W r= V - Z Q i a- O z z Z Q W Z Q W Q J Cn O Cn O Z Q i O 06 W LU J LLJJ ~ z Q z~ Q O w> O O O o O o a- W>> O w w U) z m Z o z o 0 o � O�� w LU m LU LU W z Q U) W U�00 Q�-i a- a -i LLJ>LU J LL J W Q LLJ J W>> www0ww0— tZ w tZ w tZ O>< J LL W W LL z> z Q Z U=_ wCUncUn J � J u) w > L Cn Q W w J U) 0.'S _ W W w W � M W m Lo 06 m Lo 06 m Lo 06 m Lo 06 m> Lo 06 w _ W > W W LU J w O Q Q g g W LU = c� W' z W g Q a- Cn W O Q C Z C� Z C� Z N C� Z N C� Z E C Z Lo C Z Lo C Z Lo C� Z Lo C� Z Lo>- C� Z Z O C Z_ I` C Z_ Cn o __ Cn o L>L I J Cn Q J Q C� z 06 06 = V Q w > O U� o Z W W E a- z LUZ a- O U O UM m Q o J_ > 0 J_ > m 0 J_ > m 0 J_ > m 0 J_ > m 0 J_ > m 0 J_ > m 0 J_ > m 0 J_ > m 0 J_ > m 0 J_ > m 0 J m 0 J_ > m o J_ > m m U m U w z LL � Z D Y � Q W 0 J O U 0 J O U 4t LU = U Q Q � Q N Q M Q It Q Ln Q CO Q I'- Q M Q M Q CD Q Q Q M�� Q � Q � Q C9 � Q O Q I'- � Q 00 � Q O � Q O N Q N Q N N Q COO N Q k e w -------- A' WP-*0MO<0 W co J W z oa J Q LU U a- W z 0 UUUQQQ W a_ Q Cn z z Q a- W z 00 W a_ Q Cn z z Q w W�� z W a_ Q Cn z z Q Cl) W w 2 W a_ Q w z z CO W w 2 W a_ Q � z z Q Cl) W E w 2 W a_p Q Cn z z U_ ~ W z Q a- z = U_' J W j z 0p��C�C�C�C�C�C�� J >> W W d Q 2 U Z Q z W Q 2 U Z H Q z d Q 2 U Z H Q z Cncocncococo Z Q J Z 0 Q d W U Z 0 Z Q J Z 0 Q p W U Z 0 Z Q J Z 0 Q p d W U Z 0 Z Q J Z 0 Q p W U Z 0 Z Q J Z 0 Q p d W U Z 0 Z�- Q J z 0 Q W U Z 0 J Q Q of Z J w� Q J LL aa- Q� _j J LL Q J q U Q W Q a z a Lu Q cn Z p Q LU W z W Q co J J W Cn U w Cn U U U U U U a U U W W W *k H W � r J N J M"t J J LO J (DH J *k W N LU LUN *k H LU(� CnCn N O N O M O O UUUUUU N O (� M� O (� O (� Lo O (� 0 O (� O W O LL U N O LL ULL O Q d r �J on}{ lse3 aky I:m] ❑ V O � V � 7 i3 47 rainy 3 Rhein t* .s m x � � 4 o rd auvmwy h ►n - t Jd xneruen .w r48 ,W t,&,Wj 4,PP P�7 O .. cY) ~ 0 O 0� D C/ o O O Cn >_ �_ . Z<o�N°o W 2 p N C� cy Ca Q m = z 0') 0')� U�Q°�(3)O �� J U = Q Q z .. z J Q =_ UCnN- ww w Q.r' D U w U) U U Q LU a- ~ U = U<Z N 0 p cn Q LO U . Wa��U J Z O w Li7 L Q U_ N U LU rn 0 Z a Z w J Qoo=2i z O Q J U w w O CM N w O I` M E U C/) rn � 0 .. cn— z W DUX Q U .� w w Q w o W wQQOM c0 E W z aU=Oco O O 2= U 0cr)�U� M z �°6wva' < 0-) W J U Q J w O w L J — >zooz0Q O U Z U�<2C�a-w E O U Z Q Z L Q O W SOW cD ■ Z Z Z 00 U L LL Q O � Q QN`Y'� U�w O�M(DE LU� Cl) v C = W LU Q ~ � (DW � U�=zzzJ ZO � � O= 2 Q U Q' O w w U N J N J N O m N L s C N � N O O N U oc°Omo U N � T D Qa N O O .N U p � N N L N J O N C � C J O m c m a N a o y c N N Uom- �QQ3 o— w�OO o c `` � 0 N � 00 co �J N O-1 Log Z 0'., 1 C)4.,, O Q o U � z � L1J � ®O 0 v I 1 I..L O U W W LU �~ v ) = LU U) V Uz LLI Q� O O U O Z lqq- Z O LL Q U rQ V Z O Q U U O U z Q N *.-O N 0%, Q U W Z_ ry O O (Y) LU W Ow Z — 0 QZ� m =O� 12L� F— oo � Q 00 W O� �N� C/) CAI Exhibit A Un �C C - 4 + `T.4 5 IL ; •yip ` ",ti i�,' ' . , I �r'4 so ff"L I till lill LWH r - L.L Q A ^ LL No ME r� c/ / z_ 2! F W r r r r r r r MqT r r CD LO � M � 'Q V H Z J a N N N N M � a O O m N N N m 0 0 Lr1 M 14, N m M 0 0 0 0 0 p m I- N N N tD -4 O O Om m N Q M O O O O O O c-I r-I o0 �a m ui r Q(.D Q) lD 1.0 O O O O N Qm o o co W p Q J a LUr N M Lf) W) (D ^ QF- N ,^ Q\ o J U LU O U z O z CO 0 co LU J 7cu)0 w zz ry co ry OLw U) 2 0 wztj �r O 0 LU LU U O r-i N rl w LM N � CV (n J J V) p g w °C z w 0= Q z Q z m mo o 0 0 0 O V V Q O N \ OLr) O N \ N Z ~ Q a z U 0 pC LU w N ro cmI r N L LU X a D co r- LO rn H o N oc N w C7 N U LU a (n z LU O p jcr 0 (D z a a Z Q LLI a. J w Q `i' M LU LUOv a In a in J Q F_ 0 D: J V oc 2 0 W CCD LUO _j Q N O ~ 0: O N z p O z Y = a z 0 O N O zLU O z Y? = a z 0 U C7 Z Q a 0 0 J Z w a Z = Q o Q m `� 0 Q w m Z Q H 0 J p p � w p v, w o: v Z cn U w u z cn U w N > J a H z O z �n O (f) LU J ❑ CO d wzz 0 ■ J O m 3 tD IA rl N 00 N m Ln LU a O V, Ln rn :3 �.o In LM O Q z Y p LU w > � z Yco C) a o. 0 d Z � o • V J X • U Q In C7 In J tn —A 9 N < LU a p > N n N CI_ o awr z Q 0 o > O a N a U W C G 0 OC J a W O O H of 0 O J L 0 w a N O ~ lD C)w z O a a z p z = a IL O a w a < Q Ln z a O J p Q w J U z p � LU =w z O z G7 0 co w J CO U) O W z Q J O (D L zC Y a or G a L p ( LU Ic (D G Ln Q � a� Z LU 0 c LU G) J_ Q w J z U) Q LU cn o U) CD 0 z O J Q O CL LL J f? LU Q Q w w w Q co 2 LLI U G7 d w `. ❑ El U) Y w CD Ya <mmQ oo > II O z LL vi U) Z Y U(D z a Y w O LU ❑ m w F- O O U U z 0 Ul) H 00 0 F_ J ❑ ❑ U w w Z 0� ❑ F_ 5 n O 0 z w d Y Z Z Q Q LU J J �j U U Go m Cam, O U) f 0 _j _j F- of U) \ ❑ Cn LL LU ~ El U) m � u C) ❑ ❑ ~ � J LL �\ II C) 0 Z D UCM U 0 Q w Q ❑ I..L w W Q LL �e_ J J El W U U o O W W M O❑ J D O 00 O U 0 C) a- m J w wa U)i J = U) w IY m 0: co I, CL X 0 m, a w �/ Y. d goy O cD z �s / LL w Y � \\\ m LU / O 0- Q \ I U LU 77 77 Z \ I J O 8 o+`� ®off 03 !p I I Ll J, _ E \ `e,CL O O O ®_ °�,. w �O wQ> I . LU i1 B O ,.�,�5 1 9 w o\ O ;U co 1 1 »- p U Sve ® W m I° _m v 6'6Z' V \C3 N < U I i i > °O M w - -I J®� ,J 4, � IIIIIIIIIIII� � _ I• �I _ Ol J, ♦ I ni 8 1 • ajar ♦ I� � - --. _° •■ man FIN IN 1� • 1 iiiiiiiiiiiii i� •. cry._ � q_-e ■ 3'ell 13? ■ 3B1 ICI== ■ 3;p:: �\ \� . ®r 0* M6111111i ii ❑ HHHO oee®o k ❑ ❑ a � O O� 77 Hab® ®0080 b®oa` e ®�70o b Q a�❑❑ ❑ It o❑ 8 ❑80❑❑ H E:1 ❑� ❑ ElEl bo❑ \�� r�0000 v N ON CD O O Oki O` N Q C`7 Q o U NO ww J Z U QQ m LU o O c� to z — I Z ~� Uo J LuV) • � w LLI u z Q O oo. Q O Z z Iq Iq J ui fy N NO N ON Q U LU Z O V I O LU w 0w n Q7 LO LO (Y) F_ ::D W Q W � O� �N� V) c l 019 Z u LU LU u LJJ o n � n Q� o� LU (DLU LULU n QO � � z0 U W CL O LU CL 0 0 0 \ 0 \ 0 o O \ o \ 0 to Co O Cfl O CD N N p J Q LL � C.)C rn� Oy O � CO N i L Q U.'T O co O co 0 co ci LO O O LOI-- O cn a � N 00 co OM Nt m M r J ~ N M N N M O j aaaammmm �; Z) cn ui w () co W Z uj U O O Q O O t� L M W Q z 0 0 (0cc 0,� cn co IV IV U cn Q. LU O Q LU m cn Q W cQ a Z) O W J I� o�~ Y 0 O / co 1 QI w�� LU Q N Z = 0 X m a Cb f m a LUo / 0 Q , .................. s f C/) / 0 q Cl) LU S// LU LL Q co LU / aQ w 0 // p f oNN INN �IIII p / / f o _n a El U - Ey 0, = a ®-® OR cb�b r�� _ Inn a �m a f s O II i - / °� _ w LU o - / ; Q o LU LU(�� 9 Q� �O2' / Q� ------ ;........... w f �9 /� w i �n � N � 11 'l�—'1 1 P� O ou Lv P EII / I \ V f / I /lo,> 0' III m • o /r -- r W � o roLU f 1A /' / V LL �� ® M - LL fm 00 ° M o f Q 1 0 i I Id Id IV n I Q) � ---4,jill `d Fli-.. a VV Hi Oj 1 � I IIII II � ch I I I N i N O, z B3 A3 B3 A3 B3 A3 ® ® ----- ---- --- o / BO 10 Id 9'tH I � El '-0 '-0 000 I N _ N W W O m � Qa �O z LLI U U) z LLI 0. 0 ❑ eF ❑ ee❑o ❑❑ b�®❑ L 8 o WH O eb ®❑❑N❑ e o a 8 ❑ o ❑fo® ❑ ito❑ ❑` � ❑ ❑ o ❑ ❑ ��bo❑ W -sO O M00� � 00 M V �/ N C Z °,, 01.1 � Q �O UQ 0 w� C) Z F— o/ u 0 LU V) = rw uu V z I..L Q O O Z Iq N �O N Q U LU Z 0 L4000) 0 LU w 0w Z � 0 1q1T Q Z `O O O� F— � 0000 Q 0 o0 F—N� N 020 �CD CD S CU OJ CD u �� u E o 4 �_ um LL- J Q O O) d � � o �U-c0, d U W OD Q 3�-jV) w � Q W m J Q = W Z Q WZ �v � �� m ��u J� Jm m 0� vj `, o „O-X � I � 0 Q ui U z O U ON O C'7 N 1O C'M O 06 N O •• w0 QZ CO O Q z Q J d LU F-- J z ry O H J Q U Q z O z Q U U O U z Q ry w -so 0 v�� Z QM Q U 'O OLU 0'' Uo w . 2w uZ 0.0�Q Q� 0 0 Z llq �O N O1-1 Q U w Z_ ry O V) O LU w F- 0 w Z � 0 QZ `n O� F— � co Q 0 °0 o °' �N� V) N 021 Z 0 CO Lu Q) J LL OW O � � a; o r♦ LO et t. LO vt CO V- � Lo P P Co N N Z� O U T Q � Q Q w 5w U-o0P�� ) Cl) C) OC9�UZQ y ~ ? O � N CO W N? U) V N N O ~ ~ 0: Q C ��QaQQ c/o Lu Q. - o: N cM-I 000 0 a: LL cn o � Ln o J � oo m a Ic �6 N c .i W oo 0 z N �iy v N m o .� a co o oo m o m QD N m J to 1p n LD o0 N L1 W N oo' J ID oo m 't oo l0 � O O o o m o 0 U Q N O w oo n N m m N 00 co m N' 1� ci M N f� ci ci .-i ry V - - ='LU J Q W v � ¢ W a m m Q N L! w M Z m F LL W 0 v, W uj Q Q. LL of N N N 00 ap et M ai co V) c 0) el 1* p o cm N O O LU LU LU 0. Q. co � O E- �� o (D Q W w ? Q. a Q. Q OY CO U) Z Q Q J O Q Z Z J Q W W ap mzo o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LO 00 CD N CO N CO O J Q U- ',I- CD It a) O O O( N r "t" N 00 U Q U. ;I- O CO OCD CO CO clq � co LO CO CO U-) I- (fl acn r r J aaaa co mmm cn J J 0 H p JW J H V) W 0 kn W W N cf W W v v Q LLJ w Q Q O � z N o N o O z N o al 0 0 0 0 Q v o o Q v o 0 0 0 0 LL = LL = LLJ w LL a LLJ •� J J J J J w � z J Q J Q J H J H J Q LLJ N N LU pcf Lu d V) (n N n In N (n lD cr W J QLn N II H z W W • O Q d N N n Q O F- N N Z > Z J Z O U z Q LU D LU Z �t oo N J H p J d p C) LLJ H Z z W p LU w > O c� N 0 (7 Y d W (rj Q O J J Q F- N~ Z W a O J O H N N X N I I = Z J W p 0 uI w > O U J Q O O Z LU w LLI O U O p C Lu � Q Z Y d LU J ca cNnLU V Q C a J Q Ln (j Z °C a o ZLLI (D Nor- V) a D 0 oC a o cr- LU LZ J J a N z � cr- a LL LLJ 0 LLJ V) w 0 J a H Z LU Q In w IY Of 0 LL N N l0 -1 � v) U w W yr O N N l l0 -1 �t v) U w Q LU C c 0 U O LL p w cr w (9 Z Q a w m N w U Q Z 0 p U Z p LU LU V LU w J J F- cn w m H W U Q H OR wl ~ Z = IY Z O J J L.L LU p Z •• p =)z p Q W OC � W O V — W \ C7 O m W IZ \~ m °� N U Z p J m — W } \ l7 z pJ CD _— — LU `n 0 Z 0 m J � O F-N z a a l] w z Ln a J a_ f- z LU 0 V) LU or UL v! J m W LU Z LL J Q Ca N Q W J lq* r I N O M ~ r N r M O 00 N O N O M I M O O M 00 O M 00 r N O LO LO r O r r J o N 00 o CD o N co co o CO o LO 0 O CD L L C'I CO N o0 co 0 't I- co LL N J CO M M CO N ti I` ti I` I` O J a a a a m m m m a 0 0 H Z D a a a a a a a a m m m m m m m m ri ri ri ri N N N N mmmmmmmm ri ri ri ri N N N N 2 O� LU U Y \a \a \a \a \a as , cn oC/) U � W a W a Z � � Q N N N N N W W W W C/) (1) U O m m a a � 06 0 W > > U J F- i+ m W m w z F D J i U Z Q p Q p c-I r-I Z Ln LLJ L LLJ ci rl N r-I rl r-1 Z D O U . C7 LLJ Z . Y Q a Z • p a . J v z p W p J CL V) LU LLJ J C7 Z J Z J ¢ wQ V) a Ln oc a O Ln U LLI a W J C7 J Z w w m a W U in O W O O O U LLJ w 0 0 w (AL/') U Q (/) (n � U U or J LLJ W W w LL 0 _ = _ =1 O V a cn W O j CO W Q O V J a z W 0 Ln LU z O z C) z a J a z LU I) V) W o' W z O W O ll�J O W 0 o � O _ Q z oc O LL U LU o O a z O LL U LL N C) a C)J a � w= _ W 0 z M W O a v U Q" z oc O LL U W z m LZ w 0 a z:�i 0-1 0 LL U= w Q O J p C) a � 0 LL 0 O J a Z Q 0 a U D U U O Q l0 0 (.D 0 CD 0 l0 0 (.D 0 l0 0 N 0 z < W O UoO�LW�Q.Wa� LU O U �_ O (.) W z O C)Q Z LU C) J U W LLJ Q J w J Q V J W ci J O W O O J U_ Z r Q O O Z O M UL co W Q O 0 rn cc O7 in M °p !} U C Lu U O W Co Q w � O u J U C $34 1 w _- - _ ~ C7 Y = �_ C7 HZ Q m= Q W 2i _- - i- Y o U w m v~i - V U� J LU U- LU o, U� W w 00 w Y dQ F LU m W O U U+ 0 vJ mn UZO ZLL y�, Z LU Q Q Q Q Q Ir u, ! Y lJ Kw Caal W - a U W a U W 2 N J G 0� x G af x� Q w S o Q =)o Q �O W L1/T1L TCO)N Cl) %17z'l 117Z/ / \ ti ❑ w J aaa ym� U C7} HHH U zzz CaOm ODD Qco -j �0 0j 4 ..4 ..4 ..4 Ea M clN r` ..LL ..0-.6 ..9-.L ..0-.6 ..9-.L �f0 CNN .A L - .Z4 ❑ 8 [i ❑ o ❑ ® ❑ ❑ a��0 L O o - gao bp® ® p O El ❑ El Q e El El b Q 8El ❑ ❑ ❑ b o0 Tl- El8 ❑ 8 0 0 o�o❑ e El ❑� � bo❑ O- r-I 1110 �10 o� 00 00 N 0� I CD CD ZO�o� cv . ` Q (') �O wo U Qz w—� 0 0 0 () F— Q:. U 0 LLJ • Q � � () = W UV z Q U) O El Z 0 O z Iql- z Q/ :. 0 H J U V Z 0 U U 0 U Z 0-1 N N U uJ Z 0 v I O LU Lu '� O v ! uJ n 7 LO LO =0� CL F— � 00 Q W 0 �N-.q 022 CV 00 T— „0-. � 9 rd 0 0 J L.L N 00 T— „0-. � 9 M 0 J L.L U) LL Q U w 1.-0 �1-0 o �00 00 N0--.. CY)o 0 Z " I 1-1 o Qco o Q -,o wU Qz �co �� O 0 (D Z " ry Uo LLJ 1U w � =w Uz r� (D Q O Z U0:� J O z LL. Q z O U Q C� z O Q U U O U z Q N *--o N C>l Q U w Z_ ry O O (Y) LU w 0 c� w Z — n QZLO LO =Or � 0000 �� Q C) 00 W _ � O� �N� N 023 z Q n CV 00 T— 0 L.L LO Q w 1.-0 �1-0 o �00 00 N0--.. CY)o 0 Z " I 1-1 o Qco Q �o wo U Q z ry C) co LL] O 0 (D z �- �Q ry Uo LLJ 1U w � =w Uz r� (D Q O Z U0:� J O z m Q z Q::� LL. Q C� z O Q U U O U z Q N *--o N C>l Q U w Z_ ry O O (Y) LU w 0 c� w Z — n QZLO LO =Or ::D0000 �� Q C) 00 W _ � O� �N� N 024 CD m I � I _ U�s - ■1■ I I ilili I II I � I II I � II'LI Elm I101��llllillkl II .......... (IIIIIIIII • �,,ItI��}� ,��7, .�� :' ��l �� t✓P4 (III IMEN_ I- �IIIIIIII �IIIIIIII ��_ ��IIIIIIIII IIIIIIIII � r i � A ' IIIIIIIII IIIIIIIII ? IIIIIIIII I Illlllllld;, �_ > >.. C L moll o I, ]�� _ h'r'�y ' M •' MIEN IIIIIIIIj ailli �WIII �""""" !IIIIIIIII C 1111�1�11,.� _ IIIIIIIII IIIIIIIII w I in c c fl m Elo�oo ❑ E o ®Elo El ❑ ��O o lo0 �Lo® 0El b®o 8 ®�0 L 0 O O 8 Elo®o® W Elb8❑❑ 8 0 00 o E: Ho Boo � b o ❑ - � w NO NO 00 00 ❑ Nr- `JNO N p p ZO� O` � N Q (Y) Q -,ow J o U Qz �w� U CO O cD V Z Lu U o 0. Lul - � zw u (D z 0:0�Q z 0= J O Z D c U) z O LU J LU Q Z O H J Q U Q (D z O Q U U O i U z Q C� N 111O N O-1 Q U w Z_ ry O � O LU w V) w Z � 0 QZLO Lr) =0� � � 000 Q 00 W _ �O� 025 00 M T- „0-. � 9 0 coCIO T- 9 ry 0 0 LL 0 06 Z O U W OD d� M OD M liv V IVU liv v ivZ7 U) LL V ) Z D 0$ 0 Q w J Q U w O U 0 J LL LL ti Q OQ`� w111-0 CD `O`O o0 00 NON, cN�� Z�Ol Q o QC`7 �`O ww0 U^ JQz �w'T �C)0 OC�� U � Z — U o LLI w =w U Z (D r� Q � z O C) J ry Z m � Q z Q::� LL J U Q C� z O Q U U O U z Q N *--O N C>l Q U w Zn0000 O O (Y) LU w 0 c� w Z — n QZLO LO = F 0 � 0000 �� Q C) 00 W _ � O� �N� N 026 MENNEN IIIII� Hill 1, ffmmv m 0 mid � • �i MR. �iR � � � �r. 9'• . j, _l �t is � �`dL�•� WV O 70 T, �I 1 1 1 • MIT" Imill HIM. �I y� ..�� Prin��iF�ed j F t�_ yatL _ 1 to 'e" 0 ti 00 LO N Q LO 0 J m 0� 0 0 J L.L Cn LL —J T� i CV ti 0 --- w � � o o00 00 V N O� N co O Z 0" I �o . Qco coQ �o wo U Qz w—� .� < C) co 0 Oo� U z Q — Uo Lu Lu �— w � O Uz r� m � Q 0 O C46 ry Q O LO z Z 0 J D m Q z Q::� LL. m U L (D C� z O J m Q U U O U z Q N r- *--o C>l Q U w Z ry O O (Y) LU w 0 c� w Z — n QZ� Lo F 0 � 0000 �� Q C) 00 W _ � O� �N� N 029 a c nO ivZ7 r Q LO (D 0 J m 0 0� Op U -j W LL Cn p 06 H i CN ti I I O CN cM O C I--, O .w0 z Qm U �0 V) 0 LU a (D z 0 J m 3 z ry 0 H J 0 U z Q ry mri 0 z N r- N C>l Q U w z_ ry O �^ O L U Lu OLu n lqq- 7 LO LO (Y) W QW LL O �N� N 030 Z J LL 0 Ll Q LO 0 J m �I Q 0 �^ MM� I I O CN cM O co O w0 �Qz �C)o U V) 0 LU a m llO Q6 LO El z ry O H O U z Q ry mri ry O z w Z_ ry O O (Y) LU w 0 c� w Z � QZLO O� _ 0- � 0000 Q p 00 CD �N� N 031 0 1 III 111,. _.��; II III Ins 5` Mimi ■ _■■■■■I■■■I ■,�� I III111111�� hIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII ■I III��IIIIII! �I� .� �.�a _Q ■■ 5�55 rr . IIIIIIII9 .4 t © no �❑ �� ■■ L] -. z o ¢ ry 1-1 J m El Ll El E o 0 ❑ E 000 El��®❑CY) � �O o 0 08�0 77 b ®o B ® o o0 0 L 0 O Q eboo El El r❑ B o 0 8 El o ❑ El Boo � b o ❑ w NO NO 0000 ❑ Nr— `JN01 N p p Q� O` N N CY)— Q Q� wo U J Qz �w� Qo0 0o� U � _ V) Z� U o � LUQ LLJ LU ci Zw CD uz N< LOI..L El O O LO z 0 I'll- ❑ i J m U) z O El LU LU co Q 7 LO I..L O H z J - Q ❑ U J Q - O z m O Q U U O U z Q N 111O N O-1 Q U w Z_ ry O O LU w OV) Z � 0 QZLO Lr) =0� � � 000 Q 00 W _ �O� N �- 032 0 07 LF ME"'}�., ■■ III III IIII II.I _' � r SO ■❑■ ■] _� IIIIII�IW IIIIIIIIIIN ��,,,,• i _g ■■ IIIIIIIIIIIII Vu�u�u�u�uu�uu� mime imam IIIIIIIII s � A � IIII I ■L❑■■■■■� I I I r 1 Q (D z El Ll El E o 0 ❑ E 000 b ® ❑ O O 91 E:lo 08�0 777 H b ®o B ®o o L o o Q o ebo o®El r❑ B o 0 8 ®o o ❑ Boo � b o ❑ w No NO o� rI�0000 ElNr— `JN01 N p p Z Q� O` � N Q (Y) Q �o wo U J Qz �w� U co O (D V) Z U o ~ LULL LLJ W ~c) J = LU u (D z 00 0:0� Q L o El O LO z (D J m U) z O El LU LU Q Q z LO Q::� O (D HI z J Q — U El — O z m O U U O _ U z Q N V `N)` V U w Z_ ry O � O LU w OV) Z � 0 QZLO Lr) =OCL � � � 000 Q 00 W _ �O� N �- 033 LL 0 0 0 J LL 0 0 Q J LL LL 0 0 re Q J LL LL 0 0 ry 0 J W n V z r) J m z Q n uJ n z J D m O N „N3 z „z/9-, I Z „9-, � Z 0 J LL 0 Z O U W W V z 0 J m 0 J LL 0 Z O U W Lu z 0 J m N 0 Pl- „9 � Z LU U p � O F-: z 00 O N w ' ^ Y i W N LL Q = X C) O 0 x Un CO >O 'Qn V cn > w O_�' M O W Q M W�� ¢=X� 0 w x 0 O 0 O N CO O w^ WN l~L = x Cn 0 OwinU Q CO 0O — - O C9 l~L W¢c N = X 0 d'inU C'4 CD CO >O „9-, Y Z cn LL W 0 J LL ) 0. LL Lu z 0 J m W U y J y L i C ~ _ � c pN � J U � U O U �i Q y J Q N "O ■ L mJ QL Q N O O .N U O � .L. N N J O N 0 N C N Q CV aoyc N N U t O N F C) CD M w �O �O C� 00000 II ONOS 00 ("0 O Z O%,, O� � O Q `O ww® U JQZ o/�� Q<m O O (D z V)Q F—oo� U O o6 w > =w LLJ U Z Qrp000 O CD O Z z o m Z Qo. O H J Q U Q C� z O Q U U O U z Q N `r- V (N� V Q U uJ Z O MO L U Lu I— Ov I w Z - Q n QZLO =Or F-00 � Q 0 00 W _ O� �N� N 034 0 LL w I Cl rf FIL 1i1 o� fd , ElE o 0 El 8 0 0 0 ❑❑ b�®❑ O o El o 0 �Do® 08�0 77 H El b ® o B ®o � o L O 00 Q 8 t 0 0 0®0® r❑ B o 0 0 ❑ 8 ® o DHeO Boo � b o ❑ - r--1 NO NO 0000 El N6 N r— N 01 o No Z Or,-,pI r— Q c'7 Q `O w wo U �z Q Q � Ury omo w � o cD w �z El Uo LLI w • ' ^ T w i u (D z El�Q 0 0 .j El m z Q w z O Q F--- z Q El LU Q j w LU z O J U) z O Q Z I..f ❑ O w H —i J w Q ❑ U w Q U O z Z Q O z Q w U U O _ U z Q N 111O N O-1 Q U w Z_ ry O � O LU w OV) Z � 0 QZLO Lr) =oCL � � � 000 Q 00 W _ �O� �- 035 H Z O H w I c� c� 0 m LU 0. CD El Ll 77 El0 o 0 ❑ 0 0 0 0 El El ��p®O O El O 0 L 0 0El 0 El El b®o ®o 0 B 77 L o o Q eboo 0®El r❑ 8 B o 0 ® 0 0 ❑ ��e� 8 0 0 P b o ❑ - No NO o�00 00 El N r— N 01 F9 c) 0 Z (Or-,p' N Q c'7 Q `O w wo U �z � U ry om w� o O (D L El U o LLJ w a. �V) � zw Uz ❑ rVQ (D rV ry m O z U) z 0 Q LU J LU Q z O H J Q U Q O z O z Q U U O _ U z Q N 111O N O-1 Q U w Z_ ry O � O LU w OV) Z � 0 QZLO Lr) =oCL � � � 000 Q 00 W _ �O� 036 LL 0 0 ry Q J LL LL 0 0 ry Q J LL z Q J n LL 0 ry 0 m D J U Q w r) ,10-.5E C LL �0 w�C/) N OCC) O H o0 �U) N U N Q j U '13NNVd '0313 1,9 �/E � 9-3c H cn CD o O III III III r*,%ft V� Q U) U) w z H H LL U) 0 p p. p C`7 co co p .. r,,� w 0.. Jwb CO u�0 z Q J Cf.) U) LLI z H C0 r LO r C) m NZ ry 0 H J N ONE t U uJ Z O �^ o L U Lu OLu QZ `O O� _ 0- � 0000 Q p 00 CD �N� N 037 IFF H w 4 W li CD C•7 Q `0 CIDo0 00 (D N 01� 00 co o z p� I N o . Q co Q No w w0 U �Z � Q Qm w� O o( V z LLJ ~� (J) U 0 w . O =w = O Uz m r� O U ry O z z O Q LU I LLI z Q::� LL. Q C� z O Q U U O U z Q N *--o N O� Q U w Z_ ry O O (Y) LU w 0 c� w rpoo Z — n QZLO LO F- 0 � 0000 �� Q C) 00 W _ � O� �N� N 038 H Z O H Lu S y. P�-- w 11 Q w �•Z Q `o0 (D 00 00 N 01� 00 co o Z p� I N o . Q co Q No w w0 U z ry Q Qm w� O o( V z (D u 0 z w p —� J =w u 0 z N U) 120 ry co LLI O z z F-- LL U) z O LLI F-- LU Q z O Q U Q C� z O L U U O U z Q N *--o N O� Q U w Z_ ry O O (Y) LU w 0 c� w rpoo Z — n QZLO LO F 0 � 0000 �� Q C) 00 W _ � O� �N� N 039 LO N co N N M liv IV 1 S-16Z 119 1EZ I I I I I I I I I I I I I i llr)—I y QUA m d co C'1 1n O N (O O M m (D Q Z � O z Q Q J Z J Q 0 in (n > O J n Q� LL d �m LL.M00 rn m r- Cl) } f- Q OM Z f- W CO0Z Q J J ❑ J 0 m 0 ZM 0 � J a a_ m r m r Z D LLLL O 0 L) U) 6) CO N Q z ~ W 0 f- O/ z Q J D Q J m 0 m 0 J Q m LL LL d m0 � 00 mQz J 0 z z Q Q J < LLJ H J m 0 m 0 z> J Q I w�� //�•LU La/ ¢ 2 X U- 1 2 O W X � < 0 >-o�v L J LO w min CDro Q = X = of U O � > O N I 11L-10Z J I LO of OF0OCV O Q O u~i0�� I J__J - F LO I I W¢� U (7 CV l.L I ¢ro Ll.l < = X _ O O N co O I I _J r I I I I I I I r I I I I I I I II I I I II I I I I w Hu I IJ �LL LL LL 0 0 CD CO 00 00 }� Q z Q O j W m 0 m O J Q d O 1 M QiU- U- ma0 N Q Z W O z m Q J D W Q 0 J m mO J a ILL-l9 z O" J CD m X o a F L I I LO u I w O O> 0-- I L__J I I u'! Q L U O O� > O CV NO J__J I I w0� W CV LL Vi i 1 Cw�J 0 xn U 0>ZD O „L-,OZ JLO w I I w¢ �~ 1 ¢ 2 X O O ZD U) — — I L F _ �//�� I I W In ¢2X� 1 O C.7 O LU CO > O N I L I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I G W 110 1Jc m N m N M m Z D H W �0LLL LL m d o U) Q W z W�Oz QQJ< Lu U m 0 Q w O J O U U � I � I II L _ - J 2 Q m LL LL co N m m I U ~ � I� Fc-91 0 LL i 00O N Q Z N�OQ LL� m Q Q D W m 0 J O Z � o ¢� I/ ¢U Z U'Q W Q J L x Q m D � w o JQ LL LL m 0CN d �o� 00 } CN z W O U z inQ J D J m 0 O >>a J d W U y J N c � 3 0 VJ N N �O i CAI U � o (V "O L m J O L ' L j -0 N C Q N O O N U O � N A N t; 1 _ m J O (U O oc CQ N a o y c N (U U t 2.2 r aa3 (D C)"- � w 1.10 111-0 CD m II C � � 00 00 N O� boo Z 0", w Q �o � '-'-' O U UFO OCD� tnz�- - I F— Ii U o w • Z uJ J O Uz i Ooilo� Z O Qo� Z O H J U Q Z O Q U U O y U Z NQ N *.-O N O%, Q U uJ \Z /N O MO ��J LU Lu 12 `� Ov w Qo. n ::D LO LO Q LO =Or 12L i F— ::D 00 < 00 W CDo� F— CD C/) N 040 'I .10—.OZ bo H 0 J CD z Q z Q z 0 Q z Q U) 0 z r) ry Q 0 z Q U) L OC \ F TL L J L LU O J U Z W 0 005 � = J w m a OOH O H Z W UOo F-Ow cnUOf a U Y U w no CL a U Y U Of 0o z 0 J m a C7 Z U W 0 00 w a- J U Z ~ LU a OU) w LU Q LU wLU U > Q U_ C� Z m W H Q J CD z Q co z O Q w J W LU O J U Z W I: U) Q O Z O Q LU LU w ry J U Z W Cn Q TWl1 U y J IDv' y L L 0) C �a'3 m c -OD 'o � /^ D J U VJ N CN � U N "O ■ ' V `>-O aQC L- Q N O O N U O � N N N a o y c N N U L 2.2 F a a ? O O�, O c`M II N moo N Y Q d w0 F-Z CO �O LU C/) ry J U z LLI ro A w -,o 0 1.10,11-0 v�� ZQoi Q U 'O OLU CD� U o LU . 2w UZ �Q m A 672, r,eit m LU Z O O LU w 0 c� w Z � p QZLO O� _ 12L F-00 � Q p oo °N CD�N� N 041 r 3 L A f r--XN u V LO Mus ©' ■■ WiM Wl0 n u 0 (1) QL � v "0 L a C) Z ❑ U E a- E Q 0 CY3 Q) Ln E Q 0 cf7 � 0 00 W � 0 Ln U O CD Q c Ln Ln DL Ln LE j 0 0 u Q m nL, W V) `J 0CL _�,, N a � a L a 00 0 0 E 0 0 4- � ( o CL 4- (2 L/)m0 �: C) 4 L� a) o " W U m � v7 Q U 4— ...r E 0 M co (Y) Q V J N c 0 m E 0 Ln N u m ; m O7md❑m N r C `m �E m O � 7 U VJ V P• D .- E s=mom � � T m S 2 d a a NN D v O e N � N C 0 0. \V nNP Q] Q1 m = r U r O l0 - F n n 3 W *1D .D oco (.)coco NO L V CD 0 Z c) < u 0 w0 QZ Q/w� co �0 0(D V) Q U 0 V) ��LuI� E u LJ z Q Q0 0::� 0 z llql- z GLI, LL J rQ u Q z 0 Q u u 0 u z N �D N Q u LJJ z a c1] Q LU W 0 V) < Z LO LO _0r CL' = oo W Q ❑ 00 Q 0". C� 042 N uy cur d m N r❑ C Q CY)� � �2 � c � a � a8 o _ N W os m � � T Q 7 2. Q a o � m� . m � oE OU r o F n a 3 co, _ c � � C i o 00 co � N 0-1 1~ 10 o No Z 0• p; 0 (D Q .0 Q Q z ,! co 0 LU i-r z � L LU 0 cn w a) > (Du(D z CL 0 (D L.o� Q 7C) < (D D 0❑ 0 E --- - 0 7-77 - (D - Ln V) ILJI vU) �m a- E C) Q Q 0 07711 Q * LL I V) Q - - - ' Q) u v z 7 ❑ �Q .— Q Q 0." -C:) CO - - V) U u 0� E 0 UJ .0 u c•, ,• z Q - C) a Q - � � - nE W Ul) Q 70 V) 0 U 0 —+— 0 N (3 Q u - w 11T z Q c� — C CD Coe) co �■�►49 40 K-Lji L U Lu CD (D 01-1— N N r` •p C) cr7 0rl�lwL> V) 0 C) C) 0 L QzLO LO 0 r 0 L o CL� V)m 00 Q m Q00 � ❑ W ❑ Q• 0 CN 043 o �co w W z 0 � o 2 rr� cQ LO U o =�°A ¢ r w CLC Q �z�� U7 U V7 0 CIA z Q J v-, I 1- 0 rr 0 O � N V] un U U d � Q w�CZ VJ p N 00 [-,7 tr) A Q w W _ Q � y a P4 x awe U UV un V)co�� Q Q 4 z d � a a cn OR L� N t a�i M ,CM 1.Q ¢ aV��r� L7 m C] O•� H 0 fC6 n Y Y� J LL! U] z uujd oduospuul fauumuipi l c�\y�ss A, ¢ :WlidlHOS301o3rOad � �� a } N VD `p0uowuz)nD otpup� V LL a N z y c j — o��, p w 3AV ISPA ' � S ZNHli I Hvdv AWAU S HIA a- :'HVN 10-Aro�d 055 w .� �. •.. •.. V"7 11'7 ... .� V'1 V7 �!7 lf] V"1 lf1 lf"7 V"1 V'7 �. lf] O 0 oA v ❑ v V pO c a a 7 _ O >1 am 71 n as v v v ° g m 0 al v � � ❑ aq c° w c�; F c ❑ t7 is, a U q �: a m mn coo �� ej y U �. R to ed � �; .� .� � gym+ � � � � � � a Q � •,� � G M lC ' OO d p crrr p7 U Q C a z z a R, 02WL v) 00 r w z 0 LLJ w z U) LU ;� a �; :"� :� � � a 3 W 71 v W v v W at on ❑ w w C� ❑ a a ° Q' 0 cn ` on 0a o o p p 00 °0 a LU J LU LLJ U) 12 22 .4 a ,_; a a � a Z-Z ZHIHS HHS `Q HNIZHDZVW LU m z LU LU U) C.9 LL T— ❑ z a 044 CD 0 rn co � � N ocn�l'�; EQ(-)C � Cm L �.Lrn N N w w a U U) cl r° L Q � C N ❑ d C p� IIIIIIIIIIII1111111111111111111 11 �o N n �o n s 7 H � z z 0 C 0 LL z W Of d W 0 1�77 0 m 0 m W CN Phi rq PQ N uvld adipospuvl XJEuttutlz)Jd MlldRJOS3C] 1� Of Jd VD ` 2uOwuOnD OtlOuB-a ;)AV ISUI SZINIIv INVdV AWIHZSIAk x L/] a a a ❑ c.� N U) z 0 W cy- x x x � 67 j � � ❑°❑°A L^J n°❑°❑❑n >✓ G Vi LG Or w O ❑ ° ❑ 1� o � 03 Y Cd o°\ oQ vvvv. 0 ❑a❑❑❑o❑o IC., W z W g� €cnpu7 t J W w U) w m z w W U) �11� e ❑❑ ❑ ao �© > v ❑ ° a ° +C ERG ❑ v ❑ nx �Oa❑ °off❑`a� iW E M a oA ll1OT0 4 P 4B1 � � � [ `S i ®Of4y9$ ��6�vo + •ra"�$PIPP ❑ * '' ��U �p1> °p❑ pP°p°°p°❑ ❑°❑ 0.❑ ° Epp❑❑°P ❑ ❑ ❑ G l t• ■■ �npn ;1 Epp❑n � �I ♦ ++ \❑n9p a +++++++ ++❑ ❑ {r ice] ,J + U eC 0 O O O ❑ ❑ p ❑ ❑+ +++ ++++++«+ +++ z Cd ❑ 7� ur ❑• © ❑ ❑ ❑ + + + + + r + + ++ + + + ❑ r �X t a + + + + + W ° ° ° ° ° +++++++ ++ + + *+ + + + ++ t +*++++ \ ❑❑6°❑ / + + + + + + + + 1 O ° + + + + + + + + + a 6 / + + + + + + + + + a + + + + r- + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + ++*+ + + + + + + + r + + r + + + + X + +++ + + + + + + + + + + + + +++ + + + + + + + + + + �O pp pppp + + ++a +t++++++++% ++++++++++*++ +• / ��Xj ❑ ❑ ➢ ❑ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + f/ + ++ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + - 71.^ �^X�O�J ❑ p ❑ + +/+/ +++ +++ +++ +*+ 1+\+ +*+ +++ + +* I (X7 + +/ +++++++*+++++++++ + i++++++++++++ •�-. © `• +++ + ++h • + + 4 + + + + + + + + +,+� + + + a + + + + + + +\+ + + + _ + + + + + + a a++ + ++ + t + o +a+a;+ + *+ *+ +ah *+ + +:+ +++./+ h + +++++++++h+ +++ + /, + + X F� +t+ y ++++a+ + + +++ + / CON a ° ❑ ° o Q /4++ +r`++t+++++++++*+ + Q +++ ++* ! + + + + ❑ A ❑ W + + + # + h + + + + + + + o❑❑ +++++ ++.+++++++ (1 /1 +++*++++++.++ #++++F+++++++ ++✓ +++ •� I dW a+a+++a+a+++a+++ «+`+++++++7/++,+ ++ L © a +++++++++++h++ + + +`++j •+-+ -- F.I.{ �j( a❑a .. + M + + + + + + + + + + + + + + X� a❑p❑p❑° �i rl�� ++a•++++a+a•++++a+a + + a+ �} ❑❑flap❑➢❑ �+++++ `A`• - � � X ° p° n° o° r Imo_ ++++++++++++++++++++++ + + + + + O + + . + + r + + + + + + + + + + + •� i f :, ■ i- � 1 v aW �I f � I {_�f IIJI ■1 I rq4• r'� � Ell r-W, 100 + + + + +/ + r jL o ❑❑p❑p❑ w ++++++ 1+. o as'++++,+' x . Z -Z laaHS gaS 'Cl ANIrIHD�L oo, ❑°❑°❑°� w ++++++ ++ CI} ++*+*+ +++++++++++" �a + °°p / �w +++�++++ +r++ n / a ++ + + /+*+ + + + y*+*+ + + t*+ + + +++++ + + ++ +}+f+++++ + +. ++++. X ❑ ❑ ❑ + + + + + + + + + + + + , 'pnpn❑❑pn + + + + }�+ + +1� [` O❑ ❑ ❑ p F + + + ++ ++\ ++ © ❑°o°o° + + + + + + +x a a ❑p❑ +++++++++++++++++++++ + x +++++++++ U U aoo +++ ++++ .� + ++++++++++ +++++++ +++++++++++++ 3 O° ❑ ° ❑ +++++++++++++++ +++ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ + +++ + + + +*+++ N C7 C7 U C7 C7 N C7 C7 C7 0 + + + + r + + F-� �--i pp❑p❑p❑❑ ++++++a++++++ / / ♦ n p ❑ ... + + + + + . ++++++++ 0 + + + + + + + + + + + + y �^J +++++ + + + + + + ++++++ O S / on y o° : +�.�+++a+++++++++a+++a++ (( '7 d w z + + + +++++++++++++++ ' w H +++++�+ ++++�+*++ t ....r.j r 0 vi +++ FL +++ / i{ 7"ry `,► 0 � ❑ U F•-i � � � � W >•-I + p++ ++� 1 I�.i �`. F-+ U ^�' DtiA •b cr`• ' w H ++++++++++ +++% . W w c� i~ Po W a t� cn a a as { ;+ + ++++ o + F, w N w d W + +++ ++1,/ +'+ ;C+ + xx �J W 0 W _ } + + + /. x ++++++++ +++ + +:. F'I + +++++++ + +++ + +++++ x I� z ❑ m � a z + ++ + ++++++ + + x a a � o Z as u .5 ++++*h++++*++h+•+++++++++ p a Y(�+ r + r p, 1 ++ + +++++ + ++++++` m +17 [d ¢� O w _ . A a ++++++++ _��+ R. U +++++ ja aPool 045 W z 0 Z LU_ J U C) w IL U J L C o= L Q ¢ � � CCU vIt v Q [Q N C U W � NO 0 Y 2 Cai ti#I67 1111111e1r11nnn1m1uu1ei e J LU U) z I> L.fr P°a°v' vaa❑P fin_ a_ u131(l odvospuvj Kjvuiwip_ij MlidRJOS30 iO3WO�Jd VO ` ouowu o D Ogouu-d anV ISPH U) Z 0 w w CD LU z rn p 0 r U) ~ sNsU) C0U)l(0 W J LU LU N W m Z LU w a 0 U � U �N, C� L7 C7 t7 C7 t7 3 c 0 0 U � C'n II an " � ria W z WQ o W W N[� -°v W C7 d o U CA Z a v 0 GQ �i o U W cn u U yin Ems- L7 07 ok °' o CIA W 1 cd E� 1r El �_I W w v] O .a W H a r -4 W am U �W rr' � U � d 3 m •� „ Q' � ,� W � , za -0 No : U a w a vi00 >. al 0 0 � av �� m U A w a �+; a m A -I � n ❑ ❑ a ° ❑ + r O m • �� o �oo�o �X xV,a+ / �- n• J + + 007 o°° � Q°a°❑°P°v 0 a❑°°°❑°❑° I ❑❑a❑❑°P ❑ I© ° �. ao❑oao❑❑ * l��,�. „�� X \ ❑ > 1> Q � ?1� ' I o ❑ ❑ \ A. + ❑°°aa°°° ?IE� °aa❑oao°❑ 0( 0 o � I x •�!' ?k 1+'�S +� S�+Irir+j4.�� 1� ^��' lr ri, s^)`e•' '�' v v '•1{� �+J -u l+ � - ..+J LJ lJ f:J oaono❑ i ❑°a°° F I ❑ ' `t� r « + ++« ++ / . + + +++ + +} IF + \ + + + + + +\+ t + + + + + + + + i +++++++}+�++«+++ +++ .[ +f+,++ .+f + *tt rd + + + + + + + + + I rT} «++++I. ++++++ + + • � l + + + ` W •+♦ + + +++++++++++ x x +s !y J +t+. +++},r+ + ++ram x ❑'. F� (J + + + ✓ W 0 N. + + + + + + + + + +++•+ y y f7- \+.+y W -1 ~ ++}+ ++ x +ry x r++ +++++} + x WH ✓ .+ +} + + +. +.+ x + + x t++++++++++++ C! W �/+ + + + d x Q ++++,+++++++ CO. m j)x x W rt� ++++r++++++++++++ +/+ x + +++++✓x +*+f+++++++f,i + + + + + +t + + + + + + + +++ . + + t + + + + + ,( v++t ++++ V +++ + + \ + I. + + + +% + + ++ + + + + } + } + +++ + ++ } + ++++} + +' + .++++ ♦ ++F + + + ♦ • +++ +++++ + + + + + } + + + } r+&L ++ I, + } ++++++,+,+++++,+++ ++++++++++ ++++++++++ . + « + + + + + + + + + +x `• ` + + + + + + + + + + + + + +++++ + + + + + ++++++++++++++++ ++ ++ ++++++++++ -- + ++++++++++++r++ +++ + +++ + ♦ ++ -J . . + f ++++ . +++}+ +++++++++ [� W ++++++++++++ X x ++1 ++ +++++++++ +x + ++ + + +} ++ + + + +. 1 +f ++x tx+ x++ + + + + + + + + + } ++++++ ++++++t++ ♦++O ++ ++ ++++* �+ + + ++ ++ ++�(D x x + + +o \+«++,+t+ QD++x l� �.4 XX, r, _ ' T , r. v� n❑❑❑❑❑n O N Cp [p O W_ C C 2 0 (L cu > w (D c 05 m 1- CQ N Ll- 0) d- r N IT M r-'T Q) C) r CN Ci) N M N I-) CtiJ I- M N r r to r co o (0 C' i 1S7 I [ 7 Co co 1_ [D CS7 L17 M �q co O Cs +C L" CD C{) �0. i� r- r w CO V N r Lp CV LC) 0) rn (3) m r N "I "T "T ) N 0 F r r r r r LC7 co co co co Co 1` d 0 C7 d 0 0 [5f Cp L 0000cl d 0 d d 0 0 � fl -a:amm wau�� ¢ m tU 0 a 0 D Q _1 J Q m U 0 O I I I I J W W z F_ O H U LU mz Z IWi W LL J W W W Q W j 0� Q [A z m U LL NT _ IIG X l (100d id 19) 119 S L I � I I ` 1 1 i r Q w I C 6 i rn N 1 I r d 1 a Q _ i, N 1 a ; N I �+� y V u u m i i c N L IA 0 L n9-19 a 0) O ca lC] ttf N to E c N 0 [p C a L Q o m � C U� N a -9LO -0 as � co 2 ED [ti3 Im m p W (D ` Q � U W U) J Q Y U 0 J CIO d J z 046 ~ Q w ui z U.)M E��L ° � U-) U ❑ _ >¢ri Q E ¢ U W z w I+ Qom°'rn ca �•� Q U J ❑ L -' [17 U �!! ❑ o CN z C14 Q J m �r .� ❑ [1 CV J = M r�� C I y13 V Q 0 C N G M i R J ti ik LL �7 t J w CO uuid aduaspuuZuutLutja.id 6iy� NOIldl�lD53❑ 103fO�ld U) C (a7 # z w ;)AV JsuH S ZNHv1 I-dVdV A�FWZ S HAS :3V4VN 133FOdd ■ Uj • CO CO Q Luw w z N w lu) W J LZ w w 2 U) w rn L`< w Y CO Z ❑ W Z W m z w w 2 W �W V � W W � � w a Q W u U U • f ti• l� r �y .00 < �I 047 Q M W z N L U Ccn lL ❑ _ >¢ri Q E Q U CO W Z w �+ CL C: ca��rn Q U U (n ❑ o J m cr y C V I❑ 0 C N G 67 00 i y. J h ik Ua7 J w cn Z Q 0 z w d uuld oduospuuq fuuuiwija id :NOIldlUOS3❑ 103rOUd VO `UsuoLLIu3no ogouv'j ;)AV JSUH SZNHv INVdV A�FIEIZSHA 3V4VN 133FOdd W z N W Z rn ❑ 2 Q C-� g ~ Cy U) 2 € 2E W J LZ 1- W W 2 U) W L`Qi] W Y W Z W m Z) Z W w 2 (17 048 ~ Q M W LU z N ECO(DL ° �, U 0 _ >¢ri Q E Q U CO W Z w �+ CL C: ca��rn Q U U (n ❑ o Q J m cr J = 0 C N C M 00 i y. J h ik La7 J w cn uuid oduospuuq �uuiwip.�d :NOIldlUD53❑ 103fOUd U } N VO `Usuotumno ououu�j w ;)AV JSUH S ZNHv1 I-dVdV A�FWZ S HAS :3V4VN 133FOdd U) z 0 CO Of W z N w e rn 5 ed, M W J LZ W w 2 U) w w L`¢i] Y ❑W Z W m Z) z w w 2 LL 0 0 I J N 049 33dOS Ol ION d AAA\4A 3nN3nd AbJHIHOQ �112i381 w 0 '3 ~ w O Z of O LU U w} Of m W C° � Y < Q O � 0 Cl- Q Q of _ LL 7 M 3nN3ntf 1SV3 "19 Lu u L> J J Q 3nN3AV ` ONVM113 'NI SN3a2�tf ` IHO101n z_ 0 > J O a dn3inoe N33do ),da w m w III U = gz o J O O 3 NIAV 2J31 3HO02� v > Q ry LL 00 J Q J 0LLJ � U of ry LL 0�� u) m w W O LU zLU Q00 F-- � ,41::T cf) J Q r Q �Z U ILL Now z w • Q w� co0 �� ZGo Lu NIA z CL Q m � 0w z C.)L�U)w aZQ�� F�Q O Z O Z O0 0UO OW W (.5 Z J OC LL O G 0 Z U v� Waco U m 0 U) U) = Q o U Z Z m °O r W Co O 00 N r Lu z� U Q LU Z W Q z Z ~ Z W � Cl LU p U, � z=o z z ON p J Q � w Q J 0- U 0 � U JJ JJ 1 n CL Q U z 0 II • 0 0 M W CO v) w w L, > co N M =MN O Q u� o W z �z o cli o j = N d O Cl) N W t=o D� �,W DC)O lk W Q r LL Qz� N o Z Q O� 0 o�Q m u IZ FUV �a- � J IQ w E c) h Qoz O U 0 0<-, chM c0 `n V 7111111111111 6 H U a co o w co C� co rn co o< UOQ J � LLi C C O CD -ccw < h z _o a- I\I WCww r�0� 1y LU 5p ~ pN p elf w .08 = l '37VOS " 4 U Of �o 0O \ — ) O z — 0o UQ F 11 �0 )0m m O o c D O~6 w�tO L0 w O O Ln m Om Q 'lO Q U Zz �zO°z J U U) J Q p W J Z �- 0 CD 0- Q wW� z H- Z 0 _ 0 zLU W w O= W LL- U) O P VNViNOJ �0 Al o w z oZD �wpo VONONvono OHONV�l JO AilO O C!) 1 O O N CDC) co N N N Q v00 cf) o m 0) Q rn rn Q z iu Z _ O Q U a- IL �=> U �o a U 04 0 z O Q rn LU O < I V •Qj ,C •• W ElBBoo El El 0 El8�00 ❑bHO2 L7 0 noo yob® ®bHEl El b Q e�El® ❑�00 0® ❑ b o El 0 Ej El 8 ® 8 0 0 0 0 e o�El 0 O I b o ❑ 00 � w �O �O o� 00 00 N O"-, 0 O Q M < 0 wo U Qz �w� 00 Oo� Uo LU = rLU V u z 0:0�Q Q� 0 O z z 0 H J Q U Q V Z O U U 0 _ U z Q N �O N 01-1 Q U w z (D V) O UJ w ]�i =D OLU Q 7 L J =0� 1 00 00 O� �N� CAI �- 050 1y LU 5p ~ pN p elf w .08 = l '37VOS " 4 U Of �o 0O \ — ) O z — 0o UQ F 11 �0 )0m m O o c D O~6 w�tO L0 w O O Ln m Om Q 'lO Q U Zz �zO°z J U U) J Q p W J Z �- 0 CD 0- Q wW� z H- Z 0 _ 0 zLU W w O= W LL- U) O P VNViNOJ �0 Al o w z oZD �wpo VONONvono OHONV�l JO AilO O C!) 1 O O N CDC) co N N N Q v00 cf) o m 0) Q rn rn Q z iu Z _ O Q U a- IL �=> U �o a U 04 0 z O Q rn LU O < I V •Qj ,C •• W ElBBoo El El 0 El8�00 ❑bHO2 L7 0 noo yob® ®bHEl El b Q e�El® ❑�00 0® ❑ b o El 0 Ej El 8 ® 8 0 0 0 0 e o�El 0 O I b o ❑ 00 � w �O �O o� 00 00 N O"-, 0 O Q M < 0 wo U Qz �w� 00 Oo� Uo LU = rLU V u z 0:0�Q Q� 0 O z z 0 H J Q U Q V Z O U U 0 _ U z Q N �O N 01-1 Q U w z (D V) O UJ w ]�i =D OLU Q 7 L J =0� 1 00 00 O� �N� CAI �- 050 .08 = l '37VOS " 4 U Of �o 0O \ — ) O z — 0o UQ F 11 �0 )0m m O o c D O~6 w�tO L0 w O O Ln m Om Q 'lO Q U Zz �zO°z J U U) J Q p W J Z �- 0 CD 0- Q wW� z H- Z 0 _ 0 zLU W w O= W LL- U) O P VNViNOJ �0 Al o w z oZD �wpo VONONvono OHONV�l JO AilO O C!) 1 O O N CDC) co N N N Q v00 cf) o m 0) Q rn rn Q z iu Z _ O Q U a- IL �=> U �o a U 04 0 z O Q rn LU O < I V •Qj ,C •• W ElBBoo El El 0 El8�00 ❑bHO2 L7 0 noo yob® ®bHEl El b Q e�El® ❑�00 0® ❑ b o El 0 Ej El 8 ® 8 0 0 0 0 e o�El 0 O I b o ❑ 00 � w �O �O o� 00 00 N O"-, 0 O Q M < 0 wo U Qz �w� 00 Oo� Uo LU = rLU V u z 0:0�Q Q� 0 O z z 0 H J Q U Q V Z O U U 0 _ U z Q N �O N 01-1 Q U w z (D V) O UJ w ]�i =D OLU Q 7 L J =0� 1 00 00 O� �N� CAI �- 050 31VOS Ol lON AAA\4A 3nN3AV ). 12 ]HOQ w O wO IY- � O Of Q O � 2i Z N3nN]AV,Q---. o 0 LL 1SV3 ir � N�� LU Z J_ W > Q 3nNJAV VONVM113 .N1 SN3MJV VIbMOIn z 0 > J O 4 Vn31n09 N]3210 AV4 U w on Lo ry IIIw U = az o of J O 0 3 N3nb 2i31 3H�02i U > Q ry LL 00 J J 0 C) U � r LLcrimw 0�� LU 0 O LU z J 00 H W 11:� J Q r O zLL O U No 0 Z W • Q wl a�0rya ELC Z00 NI U) Z C Z Q 2EC/) EW �z U-0Uw 0 LL (D UJry g�z0�� Z 0 LU(-) 0 0 0 WU�Qo Cn 0 LL z Q 0 0 �< o ZU > Waco U m O U) = Q C? U U Z rn 0 T Qz I..f_ m O O w� z A U Q LU CL Q U_ O CD c'') w H Cn Co w >_ LU of (V 0 � z rn gg 0 UdS o z o � V 0 Cl) V (Lu ~ M L o-CY)W w Q � U it tu w Q tE CV W QZiH Q - 0 Cfl /Z V Q W m wcn0 rn J QQJ Q z w O U o m� 7 U a Cn O w Cfl 00 co m Z 0') �� CID Q IorwUa C 2 0 Q z Z z O _ O Q V 08 = l �37VOS �it 0 00 0 to wll � r U V) N O ::D �J \ \ Q w-jz .F Z z Q z Q < 0- IL U \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ J zz u- 0 \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ Z w w N 2 w LPL i `\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ � U) Q \ \to 00 LL 00 ` ` 'Zo F-p r �b W W U- O , - W p ( \ \ \ ti J — Z C 7 U- Z I` \ \ Osr \ (� OJ — N Off, Y Z W (_j Q Z U m \ bti�� _ Of � Q Q \ \ dp �� \ , Cn X W J \ i LU 4e rn I CID AVM NVCMJ3 I N \ \ co U-) CF) Lr)co U o \ \\ � z \� o 0ZD z 1 F- ::DQ 0-m and iSV3 M7w I ` °° I I \ 1111fow 1% V-- C) 00 Iry r = r-- CM O N I I ♦ 0 `, �� ps , LU W O \ \ �ti � ♦ I I `\ �tid \ W LU LLI LU \ co Q �M > U \ �C:) N r (2 W o 0011-010 U I F— Z C) 0 , U 0 U U) U "v %W CD �� Lo 0 co Z co m 14L 1 %404. 0 U uj Z Q V J N N m N 0 J Y U 0 co o z N U I � � `f' N m i9m NwNz 2EN 0 w s J Old 01130`100 (D co U) 0 � M -- U w z I. is I '10 Idl��l� o� �0 Z ti N N Lu Q � I Cn CD , ui Z , O ,:D N o z , I 00 010 NIDH2J Z N U N 'ld 3NO2IVNV O O N O Cl) cli Cl) M CC1) wa;(O`° Fo 0-0 U)UCr0-) Q CT 0) Q Z Z m O Q U OL. w M m U [�o O U CV Z o Q Ch 0) LU J C C <140=i '� V .� ' S •• W All ❑ 8 o 0 ❑ 8 0 o ❑� b�®o E:1e® 08�0 El e El o i o Q aboo o®o® r❑ o o ® o E:1 8 o�ao HHEN 0 ❑ r w *--0 1.-0 o (D 00 00 O ZN /O>, 0"., V` O Q Q wo U Q z LU ^_ m 00 Oo� 7 F— 0!� U o LU = rLU UVz Q Q� 0 0 z Q z Q::� L_L J Q U Q 0 z 0 Q U U 0 i U Z Q N N 01-1 U LU Z 0 0 LLJ Lu DLU z� 0 7 � J 0 � F— � 00 Q W .� ° o � �N� C/) N 051 31`dOS 01 lON IViTIMME 3nN3-V AHHE]HO H381 -3 0 Q U w} 0 Ow, LU m Y � W d Q z W Q LJ_ �M�d Z O `° LU = LL O 3nN3 _V 1SV3 w LU L J W IL Q Q 3nN3❑V V❑NVMU1l 'Nl SN3(16V J VNOlOIA Y J Z 011dn31109A33�l0)ld(l C) w o w Y D Cl� OLL ai U az J o EiM3-V 2i31 3HO02� Q z ry 00 _O J Q J � 0 U Of ry LL 0 v) 0 mw Lu O z LU J M W w ry c J Q r 0 O Z U li I No 0 CL W - Q W aO 0ry a C U CL CO CV1 OE w <�ULL Q z �ZQO}wF; -U)w W U >0 zo < ti � 0 M L6 a O w 0 LL o ZV�Q0 LU Cr ~z CD J �0 LL Q 0 LL o 75- z O ZU> Lum O U) U) o =Q U Z z rn 0 ry m oN o w z Z U Q W F— Z 4- >Q A A 1 n M ❑ o o Z W °CY)� °' Q9?Z w U) v 2 Q° 0 0 El w O z or co U)~ El Q Q U O z U< LU~ z m U ?� < Q Z 2i OZ o W ZQ w z Q z= 0J U)wziwcn2 w Uu �U �w wDa. E0 0 J O W ❑❑DL wwrno"' ❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ U W o W m� Q Q� U� Ll Q Q rn U F- co Z > ❑ B'�"LO o ❑❑ wU CO z o�Un z(n�n J�� ()OO�u�❑� o �OU�ov� w El Or) Ow=}fig � 0pp p J �QQo0oz �� ❑❑ wz�Zz V awzzzzazJ C) CD Q0�,o LjOgO J��,0000�0Q �U-'-CL0DE cD°�P �LL7Qa- w°�'a-0-a-0-U0-w 0 N r7 0 N 00 J I I g ❑ LU L EloOf , 08 = « l 37VOS 0 Q w w O Q � Q J ❑ U lW O z_ � � 02 0 0 W 0<Llj (D OM LLI co cc,:)) Q �0❑ 0H2iW Z OQ a_ U LU � w�w0 Qw 0 W � �C,w U DO ItzZwQ �ll�Q Ll ZZO=�z ❑ 0 2o TT LU Qcn J o W U)(D1J�urn0 00 D o (n ZZZJ❑0❑ (n� Z QJ�WQw Zc~i� (D0 QQU)Q��❑w LU w� w — U—U)=(D Q zw ��cn� U� U �n _❑ QzY �� w oEl Q 0000w�m2 O�❑ � V OU ❑=0� LLJpz❑ °�QUUUU� — =❑0 0 Z COOQ(DQaFo U) 0 �WUwwww ❑ w �❑ w QZ��U� u❑ Oo z�w--F��z�0 w QOzrn�� uH��D1- — U=Q�oO ❑gcncncnc�Qw�a = a_ L) J w -j w F-- C) = w ��U 91 W wzgcncncncn��cn0 Z :D 00 — J=z�OQmo U ~��Q� �QO====wQ,w > Q❑wHop ❑ Ocnz�=H =O H 0 aJU��(n�wa > ��ZZ� _ IZQ zZIp � (�zzzL Z �❑❑ ❑noo 97O� QOJ�QOo ��0� C/) El U 2iUdrnIYUg'w Q Q7oU I U) Q W F" LO Y _ Lfj � Lo Q to a LID U VNViNO3 30 kilO VONowvono OHONV2A 30 AEO O co O ❑ W U � _ w El Z U ❑ \ 00 Q CL O d a Q Lo Y } o NI LO Q 0 El m w W D El CL O Of W D- Y O Q It � aw z 0 LU ~ U =) W Z Cl) Lu ~ LU W u) Qco'��//�� Z (f� J as Lu a H Q 2 Z m U 7 Ir CL :p LU 1 Q J_ U) _ U) H O twin O 1Co LL. O w= 0 O i U z z C,) LLI O J I U � Z O "' UO N O 0 LL.I i w . Q z i z w Q co i 0 N J O i Q w Z U LL [if z 0 LLI W W = p O >j Q O J Ln O Z LLJ � J Q () Q i 0 W 2E � O O i 00 M m N I Q V W Oo 00 i I CD 2i F *k m J Y (D w Q 00 U) LU m U O i U z 0 z LL Q :pow J 1 0 ~ o 1 LL.C> Co �J LU m O co m N L0 LL 0 cQ G Z 0 z O Q 0 J m J J_ 0 0 LL U z 0 J Q W Lf ) M rn 00 z LL 0 cD ❑ Z 00 w� ❑ eeHo ElEl ❑ �H0 ❑ L O goo El o o off-8o ® b ® o Q ®o o e L 8 o 0 DO )00�❑ o o 0 b 0 0 8 ®oHo o�- 8 ®o o OFb®El oo O O N O N Q v FD cf)0 w Q rn rn Q z0 z _ 0 Q O U � w Z M U r-o EL U N O ZQ rn m LLJ :+=' J J 4t4W 0 O � Q � � 0 � V ._ aj •• W t � ")+ 00 LU o + ❑ Ln W z ❑ Z 00 W J Q W U W z 0 c� W z D II 00 Iii U U) L/) w L/) O a cNi> O w � Q O U W =D � U (/7 N w O 0' = CD U Z Z Z O — Q w J F- Of W O O W O = LLJ Z Of N Q LLJ U � p � W p Z W J M Q LLJ Z O QN W � Z p Q Q � �3 KR J W W W W m N O O Z 0 N O -: O 4 O� Lo W � U Ln o O Lo 00 Lo N JLu o N o 00 o 00 o It W a o z z z z LU z J z J (n M � 9 Lo W EJ It J J J �O `N� V _ U L� Z N� 0 V) o LU Lu F— '::D Ov w Q L J 7 O I ::D 00 QW / 0 � �N� �� N 052 31`daS 01 ION 3nN3AV Ad13Ho m AMAd 0 Ai13811 '3 w � LU 0 Q Z LU Lu Lu N O LU N m co C Q d � W o Q 0 O = Q o Mid o ll�/381j . 3nN3AV 1Sd3 Lu LU ui J � j Q 3nN3Ad vaNVM113 SN3MME)73ajoAva ww zJ J w dA3n08 � m �, w J = J 2 H Q = U 0 0 3nN3Ad 2i31S3HOMJ C) 6t Z o O Cl) � O W �COw Lo Z OC' N C)N .0 Z J Qt� W0 >owwJ Z h 0 U �i S LO N N CIO o LU C7 10 rn z00 m 92 r O cD O - v OZ Z 0 o O CL r J J 0 Z LU J J Y j 6 a Of w 0 J m J 0 N Q F- CO Q J Q J Lq _ > Q w w = rn mmo00 0 CV w ti LL LU C LL � w w0 m c. o w Z O ' it z o o Q j `1 0 Z F- LLJ of i U m U) } coj = C:)w CO Z w V 0- LL W 0 N w WE LL c Q z 0 Lu Q Z Q ~� U U Z o m LL o 2i ' Z LL 0 a �¢ > a N W z z0 UQ ;oN O EZZ .. OJ w tY LU ¢ Z Q > )Jwww> CO w0 W i 0 H 0 }o 0 J W VJ 00 T- F— a w O J Q U C W LLB w J W Cn or� Of �� Ucn0�J �Q } Q OLu > cfl U)��tiLUOoQm (D p M ~ z Of w W 0 Q W Z Z 0U p- Of LL -1 U Q Uw U)COU)v)V =)0 cn zz�-z¢ _O CEO QQ-QC/) 20 J Z Z Z Z n- E LLB cG zU)��---- � LU z W Z�cncnc CQ3:H�O w Q O=__= w Q X w aJUHHHHcn3:wCL r- CV M V Lo (O f— 00 m U w U � U a z 3 N W O co U co � Q Q F- U Q w ¢ LLJ ZD Q U o Q co � z ui o w co �QC14 Z V N < Cf) 0 o < 5¢� O� co vow S?z2E �O /U IL O0 W N W o O o OM Cn O W ci LL Ln Z Q Of LU U co N LO O Q O O LCJ ULU �¢-! N U CO CNV p 2 CN O LLI cN WW Q O 5 U N OQ v QQO2 - rn 0 Q U Orn m J oo}� V o m U O zm z w �� 0o oo ccoo H z O U oz� 00 00 w o Li o V Li 6� Q o J CT 00 pp O o � LL CT Q o U) LLJ 0 Cl- Of w C) Q C.� U LLJ C) N U LLJ O Q � _ Z Z Z p O Q W F p g= O L� LLJ CD Q O LLJ U LLJ O Z = LLJ LLB z � � o LLJ w Q QLW U W O LLJ o z LLB LLJ z cn o z o Q Q w w w w 07 N O') CO z O o o � m W U TX) O `o L() °O L() r� N w o o o MJ N 00 00 1- W Q o Z Z Z Z H LU Z z LU rn n 0')Ln T TT _ LU Z_ J J J J J Q Z O p O Q J 0 LL- W W' W J U m W ~ - U)Z � W C)m LU Of O LU c O cn Q N� Z r/1 VVvi/i 0 Q N ui LU Go NI a�~zmco UQ"oLU LU U- C:)W } CAD N CO Z UU ¢ >O�~0¢ti z m � Z O W"c� LLB' O Q Q ~� F—O o A � U Z C)� m W=¢ Z z � w m C? C� CXo � U W — o CDC:) N = LLI Z� z Q W IV\ rn C H H 0Cl) Cl)N O CV W U) U Oi rn LU rn rn Q Z W oz U O_ w m U r-o EL- U N O ZQ LU � J lz 0 O � Q E C V L � lz Gd cl - • W 7 Y O m O 0 co W Q U Cn 0 ro Q z ry O H Q U Q z O Q U U O U z Q ry ❑ HHHH ❑ H H o 0 Elb ® ❑ O O oo o H ®o o E o ® it ® H ¢ ® H o 0 e H o ❑ ❑ o 0 0 b 0 0 0 8 ®0®00 o�Eoo 8 ®o H OFt00o N U Q U LU Z ry � o W w 0 N LU Q~� Z LO Q ::D o0 C) 00 �o� (/i N C)" 053 3ldOS 01 lON 3nN3Ad AdHIH0 AMNd Aid3811 '3 } O LU w � w >- 0- CO � U Ja cn o CO W 0 NI LL Q� _ AIy3817 . a 0 W 3nN3AV 1S`d3 w Lu:::) __jZ"19 W > Cl > 3nN3A`d `dGNVMl13 J Al SNIMIVJ 0 d1210101A w z W 0 2jvA31n08 Nlld0 AVO U of LU w 2E J = U U o- 0 3nN3AV 231S3HOOd 6t Z o o M � O W �COw L Z ON N C6 . Z i oQtG W > owawJ h 0 ClZ U Cj 9� 0- Z o C�3 0 [ N H O LU LU UCO55 U w LU Q Z:) U LLJ M � zo wU U) U V o Z o� %Oa U = Lu oCIJz o Q �� h 0- C:) W 10 C7 0 00 rn rM' Z 0-,)M r O) cD =-) F- w a oZ Lu �o Ee CL r J J 0 Z LU J J LL LU Y CL LUO m J ❑ O i O 0 U Q Cn F- Q J Q J Lq _ ~ C-) < Q LU U) LU =� W H = p m m 0 0 0 O❑ U v) ~O Z 0 Y 0_ Q W � ti rn OW LL. � m LL W W W ��Of J�-1 wU �[ Cl Q � o O Hczoi= O Z� OJ �� QwED(D o'Q O Z Of > U Cfl Q W U= o U o w� w Q� U2 CUi)UwoQ Qti m W (D o M m Z w Y Z O O z O F- w Ln - H 0 O H 2i or-' z o w 0 Q w m 0_ U m Cn n 7 Z Z C� w Z F O_ LL, O Q 2 0 0 w w V r ~ r LU P- W-j U Q U OU=Cnz W LL Z 0 0 Lo H U Z 0 LL -LoO = U= (") � 0 OU � Z w= � LL w °O w Q U N w W Q U� Cn In Cn In U zz�z� O> z� ¢Q�QwF--> w MM W z Z > > U W z� Q LL H�cn�OU_�o z o Z Z Z Z 0 0 O LL U O> w 0 m O ZLLJ J O O O O O Q c 0 U C= Q z Q U Q Q C\j Z0 C) Z U w H H H H LU LU LU LLJ W �(�Gf � W Cn Z Z OJ U Q w Q O_ N O O Z v) N 0 Cn Cn Cn Cn Q w H O_ U O= Z 0- '^ Q� Lu W z�UCnUCn�F-cn0 O O 0 2 O LL w A m O 0_JOUH H H HCn� W O_ CLW LL wzw o Q LU o IL w��Fnm� m �a z �� M�� m U � Q � U U � O a a z U U a w Q a W 0- z Z Q LLI O U 0 5Q� R WMCD M U 8 o rnn O W UW� xo N Q LLI 2E =maO CV rn LU LO 00 LU �oogo CD Cl 00 O_ O' 0_ 6� � J aD W g LU ZD LL z W M >Q co U"' o rn 00 U Lo o z Lo LL, C-0 Z rn rn p o U) LLJ V) O Cl- Of w O Q C� U LLJ O N U w O Z Z Z p O Q W F p g= O L� LLJ CD Q CD LLJ U LLJ z =CD w LLJ z O o LLJ LLJ QLW U W O LLJ � z LLJ W z cn O z o w w w w 07 N C7� CO Z O 0 o Nt LO LU U TX) O `o LO °O LO r� N w a) a) MJ N 00 00 qt W Q o Z Z Z Z LU Z z LU0 6) n T TT LO W Z_ J J J J J Q Z O p O J J LU 0 LL-LU LLJ J U m W ~ - U)Z � W O 00 LU m Of O LU c O cn Q N� Z CL ♦^ O �I Q or- 0 C14 ui U��zmU) W NI oc')Q,oLU LU U- O }LUZ CCD U0 of ) COCn L U H UU Q � _ 0 �z. m <ti Z 0 W"C� 0 � L' O Q ~� F-0 O co U � m U Z O m � w=¢ Z z w m O C� OC) � U LU CD o CDO N = Lu z� z Q 'A M 0Cl) Cl)N O CV w U U ai rn w rn rn 'a o z c UO-w m U r- O O_ U N O ZQ � It �I ,O _ „l '-77VOS I 0 co w Q U (n 0 ro 0 N O H W W U) W z ry O LL J Q A 1 LJ O U z Q ry ❑ 0000 ❑ 0 0 0 0 Elb ® ❑ O oO o 0 0 El o � o ® b ®o ¢ e ® o � o L 0 o 0 0 ❑ o o b 0 0 0 8 ® El o 0 0 0 0 0 8 ®0 0 O F b o 0 ry O z INT w z ry 0 �o W w 0 2 ::D w n lqq Q~� Z LO Q ::D 00 o00 �o� (/i N C)" 054 3�VOS 01 lON 9l/9/9 31V0 101d lSVI 6MP'l0-dHOMd\dWOMd\9AIlD}u9}\LZLZ-9�9\:P HlVd Mum SVIS3VWa A8 9l/9l/L:03AVS lSVI AAA\A,l 3m3AV A2 3HOQZ . W 0 LU O w O ��ZLL U o~Q OO �= Al 1 3nN3 1SV3Lu Lu J cG j Q 3nN3nV VGNVM113 'NI SN3a2iV VIbO101n z ❑ > J O a Vn3�noo �]Mjo AVO 0 LLuu m ry III LU � U = Q Z 0 0 J 3 o N3nV LL- L-) b31 3HOOb ua 2 r-,) LU d d Q in UJ Q N 0 Q m Y W w Q C N - N C v u r � C > � F k m i Q C Z a O L Q U C -0� U < z� otf o LL O u U C _ _ o co LU m LL co co m > J m J J O� LL U N z o0 O :� Q N LU �~ o � C Z O 7 o z Q O W z Z m Hw O Q U) R R T Z CL U_ U) c O U U 0L O a a) M N O1 L >N 21 N 0 O WE WLU W U W ❑ z 0 z LU Q�w W LLL Q X L z 0 z LU Q�w W X LLL Q L U U) LU v �w-Cn m w Z z U) LU :E CO z Q W 0OW QLUO 2iO w'O LL otf Lu Z Z Q( ❑( H Q � w� Q z z zzz�¢z L�L��z ��~ Q LU ��oLLW OmwQw � CL Z Q < z(/)z2 J J QOL� z<O U> w >0WZOQ� O z Q w m o= mo LU ~ w W' W Q or� U 0 Q 0 olf H J W (n W U)Q Q U)Q W m m � U ❑ Q LL U z O Q w w w m Q x U WE N38WVHO 9NMAS AbVWlbd UCD ^ CO LU \\\ LLLJ u 0 J D w ca W W' N U) z v :E CV 0 OQ Z W—Ax mow Q � Z O i L/ 0. LLW C/) N 0� LL J Q W } O f- W W O CO W Z Z N ❑ J 00zo QWw o of_ O J > O� �o�—� Of Lu 0- W }~JH~ Cn O Q W �QmwU J�Cn w>JCnpU2i w U J w W Lu Q Z z o o w w p LU C) z Z } � > _ � C) � Q z >- Z Q W LU Q w ULLj ~ O J LU Cn 2 Q❑ m Q LL Q W J_ W' W � �~ aWz w�00(0 z w� Lu Q Wz O JLL Qww � o Lu F-0z=>z = LU UCOcnQLu J m w W Qz0 U NCO ALu LL O=Jww JwO� Cn0W pfYL) O (� Z 0 coJ W U (n ~~ LU > U W 0 J U)�E C) U Q LU Z W p ❑_~ w Q J LLJm W 0- CO Q W LU Nz Of cfl p — LU LL O z U O ~~ W❑ O LL p O p W W CL H LU LL oQ 00Q} Lu C) �UO ==W x > 0� O o J J U Z c°LU QoQW W Pw Q Lu Do W J_ Q� Q Q Z p Q J Z W Cn p lcl�W Q LL J � p UOW _ QJ w LU CO OfOZv Q w N^ c.�z W �❑ Uz�Ow3 = LLM: U Cn II o V/ EL J H W_ � Z m W~ Z CNI (D LULu ~ U LU LU cn ❑ J 0 J �' (n �'v 2w O F-Q0O>wF- LLj ��LuLu >Llj 0z Q Cn N 02i W 2Cn �w �HU �Cn LL=J Of Ln cG Of J W � = H O ~�Q OQ �O� U�U�LL-) z�W w( =zQ�LLIJ Q W ( Jw zCno awl.— LU Of O� �0} �Q�QEUOQ> H (Y Q UQ �-w Q W W z Uz[Y �CnQ��z�=W LL Lu W U)� W Of mw� �H W W O (Q w�� (�z=Q�J�J� z ❑O �II H0 2❑W w =UW < z J zp0-0�0LL w O O w J z U) Q ❑z � J CQ w 2 0 J Q J J>� O Q U Wm � j U Z >_ Q c� QCL 2 �O ❑_Lu �w�0CUnF ❑- �W Z❑OQOzL �w ❑ LL ❑� �cnCn J} W JO = �O Q- UO N J Q O W J Z W O W W W J W � W O} ALL' CI) IrQ c0(If� �Q QLuw �L>Q ��U) Of p C0� w�U)LO O❑ O O X�2Oof X Q� �_ �� cn Q W~ (n p H Q J W Qf Q J U Q Q [Y W � Q W W_ (n Q U W C> U W LL O CL � z cn LL w �� U p J W 0� p- 2� W J z Q H❑ U O H z LU OQF _ _ O�wp❑c~i�OUW oLJu ~T< ofCnO rz ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ LU�<mz}LLQ= yJCL Z O W CL CL � LU H� Q d Q Cn W W H W Q CL t- �O z-,C-i J Of LU W LU Q Q > p z p ry J 0 m U O 0 O LU w z W H w D < of ¢w�a-w > LU w LL W Q D� J -i LU U O C)CD CDZ W LL z Q 0 0 Q' w � ~ � Q �a�w Q I O E Q LL W U ❑tnU❑�O I R ❑ ElHoo O ❑ 8 0 0 0 ❑ bHo 1 O O o ®o 0 E:] 0 0 z - J F W w U O W~ m W 00e®❑ o o ® o® o Q m W F- z WLLI U Cw = ❑B ElEl o 0 o��H U- o 2 m� F� zww � W W s_ � ot�® ® ❑ M O H W IY O z z F U) OQ m Z F z b oEl o o to M o m m m LU z 0m d OF CnJ mQ W wFZ �Q W r��+ LJ ono❑ p U- Q Ld8 O J L L a' W J d W Z Q LU _ O F ®o El( o o W U� W O0 2Q W W tZof V Q �U b v mQLl co w � z J ~ �w 22 Q bo o� IL LU �00Q LLB Qw LL O O w S = Q Q F Z U Q J F J Q , O U 0 0= U w C) z=z w o N L) -a U) z OW F w U > = U 0 0 IL p IL oUJ ~ 0� LU af �a as v n-0 �Z¢ ® El I.- w O p z o 0Q OF Q00 m� z 00 2 Y � �Jw w �0ui °0 O LL, ~ J = _ � OD Q M o C� W U) Cl) 7- Z Cn U) �tnw ° JH of W Q `moo �� z J WU O� z i9~ >- >- >- F-w w'J O - ° 2Q~ Wo "t1DLO v Of L �� U w IL a �� iL w W I.- Q oQo o CY)L� j� _� w w= WOJ a �w U� Z o= Q� z~ o z �~ W�Q� w w� °�. J C fn W W Lu >- F Q U J Q Z_ O J L zO cn2 m_ U J Cl) ZQ OaQJ z 0-1 C9 J z d Z J m of Of O U) 0- Z z Q W =1 W� Z W d Z IL = N cn O Q� m Q O w U Z o tY Q _ O IL CD Q 2U wU QU U � ?cnw LLm 00 ZQ w ON N N N CIS N F F } 0 Z J J U (f (L =c� z 0- U U LJLIW O Qwr �zIL ZWw W J Zw =1 W m ~ -1m Of W� W F-Of U w 0 J F L J J - Q� W Q 0 LL z Q W J w 7 J I.- U) U)z-1 J� ~ �ILLLLz J° �w O m 0- a WU D l Qw w � w Ow 0 o�z m O a w vLLI � Qi 7� � cf) 0 who � �� z �< D LL z Q �F- F U z C7 O F Q U �LLJ _ O Q Q w C W m J w L = Z ° C 7 Q O w d o D w0W �2'� z= w H � w H_ wwI Q0- p W v¢ ° m Y Q F� � ° �JZ J z J tY Q Q U W Q !Y ° F Z O =H c) LL a a �<w ° owe z2 2 rJ°z r co LL 0 w�� Q �?�I �O w a �UQ ° M wow w OOQz C7 �I Z inz - O =Qw w = =a (D LL Q af O LL o w - O O J O Q Cl) Z U 00 Q U cn z < W CD O U W W z U �� ) N Z Q m m a w w CZ'� �W U d W� -1 W O Q Q o�� m O Q m 0 J o O+i in w F, JFcn Z J J Q a fL W aaC7 C7 Z Q W 2 2 LI- w W w2Zo_ m F° aW �a o F� o waY Q© Z ° = J W� W~ j W Q 0- O W Z W Q Q �W O � O W W tY J Q Z W zdm U) Y (n Z 2 W z 00 Q HZH J J W Q WHQH x z Q W J Z CL IL Q W Q Q Cn W CO U LQLw~U' Q Z 2 U) m m w C7 00 w w W 00 m Oz co O LU w Cn O m LL J ON M 7 L6 O r--: N O N c-5 -4 LL LU Cm G Q CD U U o Z Cn J LU a m O O d �❑ O CL Of W m Q U J LU L Lu>L)j� ~ Q C C) — LU xJ � J S L L-- 0- 0 � I O J LL O J 2 W U) } Cn O O w z 0 o O 0 LL W 0 O LU LU U J W z 00 z� U l Z 0- O� 00 J LULU LU LU � Z w W cn 1 0 z Of ❑ Of O H cn L O CL z 0 (1) m N C0V m U 0) rn w�Qrnrn ,) 'Q o z I U EL w m U r-o EL U N Z 0 Q 0) It LU ; J cl O C 5 V L • .i Gd • W O Cl) N MM W LU Z COo Z m LUm w LU M a U LU (n U) v w Q Z m Cl)w LU fZ� = 0 W0 E (V M V 0 Of Q 0 = 0 cD 00 Z D U _ Z m p z U Z o c8� U �0oa_ W U_ H U Q LL �O cW LL c m W Z H < O wz m O W Z H Q Q U Z H LL z W LL LU E W Q Q U LL- O J W U wCn >- �w � �z U)�� O M U)LU w W J LU wC)m /1 Zof LU Q W Z Z M 2 O Lu �z w LL >- O m m W U Q (D = W 0� p (� W U Q _ W ZZ C� —0Y (/) U Z O 2i W w� �Q C� O w z U 0 Q 10 v W ^ w 4 O LL 3 u CD O Z W 0 Z) O { Ot U n h�l O U) 0 U (��°i V W > z J D i U) —) 1,,4Q o 0LU O a Op � Q r- w CN o�'^0000 v N 041 O C co O (Vl _ /� Q \ wo U Z Q � V C) m W 0 00 � 7 Uo LU Lu UV z Q Q 0 I N� I..L 0 Z lqq- z/'�� LL 0 LL. U V Z 0 U U 0 I U Z N� I..L N N O� Q U Lu Z O v J O LU Lu F-2 '� Ov w 0 F— LO LO 7 =0� V) F— ::D 00 Q O �N� N �- 055 31bOS 01 ION 3nN30 Al N3HO kMNd Xi13811 '3 Q } U 0 W Wui >- d 0 U m� U 0 LU Y a-W Of LU LU W O Z O Q J ui o= Q z m � H o 1/1/j�d 0 = Z Ow `� ,�1�3811 Q M 3nN3M/ 1Sd3 LU �Q Lu"'Iq 0 > m 3nN3M/ VONVM113 AlO z SN30 VO 0 J FN�IJOAVO www 0 vA31n08 w Ln Z J = Y Of U Q a = U 3nN3Ad 231S3HOO2 �Q I .Ill O LL J Q ~ � 00 J J U LU o LL- O�m� v) w ry W O w Z J Q � J Q z r O C zLL. U Ja)N CLcW � �1 LU Oz (5 CL Z — � m NI m Q��~Q�U� UU)o�w a Qo = u) LUw J Z� U LU ry c) Q �Oc<ti wv �O wV�Q0 0L z QO LL o U �Qo 77 Z C) >_ w�� m O co co CU CD o Q w 0 m o 0 CV LLJ =Q U W H Z 0 W CL )F LLI C Q CO L � C _ W - C C) C O C Y Q 2 Z W U cc IL �J w LL O CO a m M N m N IL W 0 CL Q z O Z 0 U U Q J m J J 0 0 LL C7 Z 0 J Q W LO o 00 Z W 0 Z Q W co W LU W z LQL Q U) O LLB LU LULL Z Z = Lu W LU J UU�LLJ U of LJJ F LU Ofof Ow LD0U =-i> O W Q= < Q C/� O U co LU W O M N-i QOwco00 UUU w0Q � U �") M W CD � W o M U W w U O W zL~u x Z Z Q W r Q�-- LL- � LL CD Q LO LULL.�O Z LL J U Of Q U) LL M- �W 0 CQ O co z z z J 0 Q w w< Q 0 = v) Q LU LU U LU L, z0zzzz0- ow00000 wiz a C) W ~ U H H H H W H 0 SL Cl W Q 0 ED cn0cncncncnQ�c~nwQOQwa� w W 0 0 W � � Q L0 X 0 Q LL. Qofa0 O- N M � Lo Co � 06 (37 O� U) 2-7 LU Of Q W Z � Z � W W Q W W W O J LL W 0 0 Z z J 0 J CL > J = CL W W W = w LLB LLB > W O ¢ Q U CD H U (� Z LL Cn d C7 Z Z Z Z Z Z w Z Z Z Z Z L Cn U) U) Cn a) C2 Z U) Cn Cn C.!) w Y LU Of W W W W W W U W W W W W 5 U- z LU Q Q of J Z 2 U Z v) - o LL LU ZD U 0= 0- m p rr LU L U w= o ~ J O of LLB p W2 C!! n¢ z_ C� w 0 0 LU 2 U U LL Of F- 0-cn Lu co Q U Q w CEO N N Z C7 x � U U I 3g�g w w w w w w w 2 U U LL Of of co U) .0 J w a 8 c M a- o o a ~�W a g 3 o LU a� _�� w Z ti �� W ?ZD C) 0 Q a Q U 3 U L„ Z c� � o / ` a w Q M p Q N M CCD ��R) 2 O CO 0CD f 1 M ' Z U) o`� LLi LOB LLB CoLLI Z N M cli of Q V Q N M CL V 6' Y p 0 0-)p rn z Z 6) C CT)M V O GG w' U Z Q v M O Q Lf> LL. C.Q.) N F. W NCU�j~ o OUP v W� Wo oN 0°M°� w U v 'N 0 U LO U �co UV LL M �I CV M N = Go U N Lij I� N U N �uiQLU J �O=QLu U COo L:u 9� xOQ r 0 OC) ��Z �rn wQ- UO=� o> 0 o Z O � Z p �� o �� O Z rn o> 00 z rn L Z rn N d U rn a Q O d lLO° d= o° Vod�! o- _3 wco rn o rn ,OOI = «l --77VOS W U U ms') Cl)) N N e w (O Cfl = Q U U 0) w a00 w Q Z W O Z U CL LL M U U r-o N Z MQ d7 � LU J J cl 0 O v_ V •• W Q X 0 z 0 0 ji LU J Q U U I• N y � '� LJJ *SO *so I -o v N C>, O O� C>l c)Q � w0 U Q Z co uJ ^_ 00 0(D Q u 0 LU c) ui r V Uz LL Q 0 ry 0 z Q z 0!� H J Q U rQ V z 0 Q U U 0 I U z Q N �O N O41_, Q U W z ry O V I O LU Lu OV) I LU i I�n L =0� V) F— ::D W Q00 Q �J �O� �N� C/� N Cp, 056 ,0z z o W LL Y W J W O > CQ < F- cn CO - U < Q LLJ = > U) Z i = o m m O U) CV ¢ CC L LLJO 00C w ¢ 3 0 C 0 Q U () o C C O m w Z w Y Z 0. CO or� a CO or J Q U M C z Q L o U o C) v cn N z� w U w w o 0 w c II w O m Q Q< Mw W Z C¢r) % Z U -_ of =:)_ Z U O U L U oQZ Joy W U U Z � OZ CC) 0 U O¢ O 0= 0 C U% Q= w z Lu < =) L U c 0 w r) � J CID 0 J ¢ J i arf _ J2E El w 0 ❑ d LU o Ow ❑ w cn Of ❑ LU Z 2 z w Q 0 qCO U w w W U 5 m z� ow �g �z o ¢ �QrJ<< LU =w 0z w(j w� W0 Q ❑�i-��QW� � ¢ ❑ Z Z ❑ ¢ W Z W U A W o W g o1� �L wU(-)< C/) ¢ ❑wz LO 0w j Mo 00 ❑� �n0 �U�C/) 0 QfLLLW<gc)<_j w (� U wU) cncn zJc~n0 0 ¢w(D (?—w0 3 w �Ow Z �Ia H(n �� ❑� w Ll m0<z�w ❑w �� Q Z J0z zz z�ww w'O2❑C:)W ;� Q p¢Of0 00 0U)� �p w p W w2 ❑ - UU U o¢2 ❑ �zC)0Z U) c-j m 00Z ZWU) ❑Hw wW�c�❑cwi)❑❑❑WLJia_a�7� Q C- W z0 zw� -- p>_zcnOcnJOf(D ❑ ❑w ❑ ❑ ��o O <3 W w2ZUwS2D�D�_1�ofpof�OUw22�00 J > z w0 �0¢2U22pxw¢ ❑U�0002w�zOJOJ j w w ' 2 m M O W U J H¢ H H J 0❑ w¢ d¢�¢ w�� w LL LL J vM, W % ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ I C m 00 W Q ` ❑ M lt In El Li 00 rn CL g o § E; M N H C:)Z N c� LU z�i F g 3 C� CD Cl) �v0 W U �J� C) g w v C7 W ¢ Z m Cl) w9 o0 5 �; Z 3 W LO > M w Z CID MO N > v) O Z < ti cc")) 0 > Z C=7 ~ ¢ M I.i O U Q Q aoa) C)° W Q U0) U N Cl) OcN oN °�° �ms rn O¢ 2 t ou oN Ow��L0 �Uv C U OU� U.0 zrnHv W HUH rn �UHC WN �MON =cflUC4 �OLLti N ��Q� SUN OQ rn ~ V = LLIV xZ ti cnxpti ZM CV W 0Z L6 0� Zwa J ~haw 0 LU �00 O¢: ¢p=� z�°; � �¢� CD0 o LL' �U Z V ¢ Z J t mJ omU Z w (� oUm o z zCD 0 o Z O O v p o p Q o o< o W c ZO o CD Q om < = w i co F_ _j r- LL Q 00 Z LU W O� LU LU Co Q 2i H U ::) LU U U)Z O In 00 Of �Q LU T Z O Q Now J U) . o 0 ��NI OoOz� a: m LU Z p NI U) 0 � z o0 O 1u U ¢ CD z LL. C) Z Q o W 0 LU 11f F -- c� U Q Q O m � � o LL. CLow�� W 0z O 0O Z� QQ o O �U> U �o Z O U) W=¢ Z z � of W O L7] C F) ham-- 00 � O U C:) C)LU LU Z� Z �Q Cl) Cl)am'lN N w (MO (0 W r— ) 0) Q c'7 wQ0)� > w N �O ¢ z0 z C U IL � CD C)NU r- o w0 � a ~ z Q m W ;� O J i Q lei•• W o M M M T- �1 C�) Z EA emno '1SIX3 '1SIX s S S S S - O (J ON M M M — M ��NgAy nI M M L/ M _ M M Y031411 z Y 00+66 ILI —� 00+216 w C-)00+96 ----- -- --- -= V— —— a JLA- C — � M--—— —— --— — — — --- W N rn------- — — — — --- ---- N ---- -- —g00� CICR— �� --- ----- -- a aw — T M 3NI1 � w w s y9• 4u, 3/��d 1S`d3 NO H1f10S ,£L5 L — M y y m y Z �, � 4 _ %ZE'� °v ° s �° �� d m a%zE_1�a I Q - — — S I _ U) S%Z'ba a °-fI eId v Ja Q s° 1 �L �'110 —III w m_ no,— am am — 1H _ IS 30 3NIl — s'° 66' o O I — a — o 0 1s 'LUM — bECNI 9tt m cn a a w In � a BID n r 1S. i_ tip 1S. _v 1 -s w NCI ° �� ems• �� s �s sy �� Q o a O Q s y Q ma II of c �a o� �a OO ° �a 1 0 _ �j p s 00 c' s T o' _ 0 0 - 0.0 l I!I�J IIr ',A �� `dH'\�I _ °o',A °o ti LL Iyf/�'03H nvzjaNVH N I u M CO+ o Nl M co �£Q'Q OZD'0 Ln J. 0VZO U70 U70 WU 010 010 %30 - SLIM SL'5L-0O 9100 y � \%o°ZO'OA ZO'00 Z0.061�9'66 WIN LV66 LV66 LV66 19'86 09'86 Z9'86 =3 i =AD =AD =AD =39 =AD =3J =39 =AD =AD =AD O =AD =3J =AD =A =3J =39 =3o =AD =AD =AD =AD 1 213M3S 'dONd o - ° ° .Ii�0�/°O£' d9 _ ! t /00£' 6 �r0 sy O£' %0£' 6 `ry !� �' 0 0900'0=S S - , .A n /oO£ -° s O N y �O w -� -moo. ti0 M. O� 2131b�M �a13 'd023c. `� M MM _ o M ° N in M 9 MNI" „'d Nd M -s+. 9• ° M = ME' op''� 2131WW0a 'd021d %OE' 1 y - 9E' W 9E' W 80' W 80' W 99'00 I 99'00 99'00 MOO MOO EZ'00 L9'66 L9'66 6E'66 6E'66 ,� ®6, - =39 =39 =39 =3J =39 I =39 =39 =39 =39 =39 =39 =3J =39 =30 s ° NOIld1S 9NIJ21dH� moo° - - O IWO 313IH A '3313 'd021d -.1st, — , Ci 0 _ U_iLL. �� i �o � \ N - o � o V 1 1 42" 11 �y I 19 � _£ £ \ TIts ago F. 9cnOO 9 �oy l �/ • all T LL 0 6£'£0 ° a - ocy o I 1100 s 1 ° U_ 09"Co90. Z rn s ~ In �' 11. 1 o •�, III °! aWBflyOR w O O � ,� 0 00 U_ °�. sy 8 0 09 £0 y y S3 9�, y /°\° ,'� Q COP iw S3 O°s0° 92 ® J' 06'£0 �y\° o�.sy 9 s �' �.'� a N " ul �V NOOK S ZO Z9'£0 0 � O � 3 �o .y0 ° 9z. �b o6' Q,Z/6 9 9 0 V ' 0 �S6'£0 A �y� o d o�°2 �/\6b Z0 9 y p6, \ 0 9Z'Z �O ® '9�. £0 y t 09'ZO o O ' ZE' S3 b'l�lbp by y0 ° 09'ZO S' � >d/.�s . �. oo � 0- 9'ZO b0' 60 o' 99. 8'00 3 10 gS \ ,6' O' 1y� o ° �y 0S Sd°�'O° ��°\° 93 0 O `ti�°°. d 0 A y0 6' SZ.60,b 0e0 Q�� & 60\° dH/13 0 �0 v ti 8'66 u_ v °� OP, 11j 3 F- \ � � Oa 9 •y0oo O®, Zg• �� 9b•l3 � \ I � `yos, 0'oo o An o° �od�, gb•6 8J � o WIL L IL LL 19 R'� 6e\ LS6, -I %0£'9 '919, Q6' 1 I 6' cL I �O ..Z16 b u_I � II r- /C, L�,: 000 / m 6 LI 0 g•A - - ❑ �� o ❑ N LL �J' �N III 00 C,4 ��_Ee ° be, 9EP e LC) CM6 a) rn 6•,� rn / 16 s't c' "91 06, u ti „Z LL 0 t7 a �o %0b'9 T �9. o .- 9 o O 06, �Z ,� CN v. %I lee LU 69'66 O cn U_COP Olt 9b 1' 6 ems, �� ',,� tea, I I ti 6166 / O!. o C. I •y 66�/\ 6Z'66 f cn bL'66 NJ ca'<,e IL awass mass A IS,yy66% l6+� °�6' o° � 1V66 66, o� J� '�y 66, 9 O 6' 6b86 N NOOK E] 9� / ° o � 69'6 '�� \ 6.86 / 00 °o Z9' 3 `9°° ®' 6L'8s 8"I`° . f. 'V �1 68J �A ,yo° n0, 99'6 81191 cb / � '66 ` 61'86 LO J \ 93 8'86 y0 '�n. \� 1 V00 b �yJ00 S o 000� ® Ob uL ° ° dH/13 \ \ 00 `s!� s2 61 6 y a_� O 0, �� 9'86 �s� y0 6 0 O �/� ! 9 3 0I £8'16 g'.9-Z\ �N a o o�, S1'1 0 ! �/\ 61'86, LL.� s CQ os� LU 8 o i� - 9 < yeJl6' O a o u b 0 �o OS'00 3 a °c LZ 8S'L6 9 Go o; / a rnpOOD / £0-90 133HS 33S 00 N � / LL ` �Y (4 HTF' O s� rnLL 6' ! LL LB 000\!6+ !6+ I Lrn ..Z 06, U, I L.L OF- 0 G I LL Ch N c N I �_ ca _ o U_ t] ry LL o N CID _ W W y w rn� i C7 rn � c o m Fo �w %Z 11 m M CO 000 �� ZZ m \ -,m11 CD o� 96,E I c 0 o I v U \� b o I c °oZ I c7 Z ��-96+ I � I „c, LU � L—_ - LI 16'CD LO IY `� cncI i�CY) �CL 1 0, 11 �, � Ln s6,y II "� L ElE o 0 ❑ 8 0 0 0 ❑ ��El E:I ®O O El o 08�0 H b ®o Q eboo o®o® ❑ baoo 8 D E] El E:IHeE:i Boo OPboo w -o 0 v�� ZQ°i OLU C�� U 0 LU . 2w u (D �Q Qry 0 0 Z N �O N OI U W Z O v I O LU Lu 12 ::D OLU Qz L0 O� F_ ::D oo Q 00 I..L O � �N� 0� N 057 0 Z LOLJ Q J Y O m LL orfW N 2 W J J❑ O O o o< H Q J 00 co N Q J _ wQOfQZ�� oo ❑ 'w o C }Q = p m m 0 0 0 0❑ w w J ❑ W U ❑ ci i� O w LL � z 2 z w Z Y Q W rn LL Q US 5 U Q m LU q� Cl) U w o w ❑ U o Q p O Z ❑00, �� z O Q Q J<<T-LU W= o w o Z w w D � o Q G Q w F O cn CU o Q� I Zz �w LULU �w C LL L- w w Y O Z w m J U U Q w w 2 z u O o W O L m Q z m w J M O ❑ O 0 W LL w Q 00 J N = Z Q o (D - w �� U wCn cncn U) o El QwoDv w0 II U LU o oo n Z o LL (D oQ QD) aw❑� w w�zz❑��w W w o m Q¢ No Q Z� Z JOz ZZ z�ww � ❑�w�1? O = Q z > > n Q 0< o OO OCn�a — �OJ0w m z Z U z 0 m LL ❑U�U UU U o< ❑ �zv0z�zcYi� ,OZ =„l �7b'�S oOc�oO>� z ��ww ww w �- w Z-j (D U H ❑ H� w O❑ Cn I❑❑ W LL d Q 0 � Q N � zo (� ww�cnvi cnOwzcnocnJ�(D ❑ ❑w ❑ ❑ Q W z o z a o O �� W U) El U)CO n3:-J p�w�w�2�oo C� 7 O O � of L, w> z � w0 �OQ=U==02w<L-U�0002w—z00 O Q= 0 2 0 LL.p W w m2 O CLUJF-QF-F-JF-Cn ❑W QCIQHQW W LJLLJL > U W W J W w CO C❑ O I^r W Z W p H p p MaM 2 Cl) 7 ❑ ❑ C C❑ ❑❑ C C p N CL w< H O U M m O W Q Z ❑ M LI') ❑❑ 00 6) 0 U_ gM N ~ CD co 04 w - cn to a Z W< Q w U W Z Z w U O W >Q N 0 M w ka' CD co C�O a cr o W N Z [Y Q U w� (MC) UMU (YQ�,jCL' U 0 COL N 00 CD 00Z m D CSJ 0 U .. N N L LL C U Lo of w U - - N J Z06'H� W Q�UIH w H v W � W = N �Owti W aUUo' HOU = �wCi rn oz N 5 QOoo~o 2ofm p Q w J 2 Q Li i O CO Q u i J 00 m J o [n U rn Z w F U zQ Z W of o 0')D 88�o � �� OC)- OW C �oOQCD oQ� N0- U CA CY V CL Q — O CL U CL CC I� J W U, M-00133HS 33S w C o Cl) �[ Z ti ULU z o Q w`o z Q M 0 z UOd��c�� 2 U LotU U N Coo � LL C) CD — of H Q 00 Z LU LU 0 LU ED m Q iF- 2 C) D LU LL C Z O O � �00 Q O LU Z O co Q No= J u) , o 0 ��NI OoOz� Q Z m NI u Dm��zof ow C/:) LL. O O Z Q COf _ LU F -- c� U Q QOm�� 0 O o �Lc' �ow�� LU oO z�QQo O �C)> U �o ZO U) w = Z z � of W O m O ham-- O O N U o LU w Z Z 3 Q Cl) Cl) lN N w Q v � U) Urn w wQ00 Q z iu OZ U a- LL M U) U [: o F U N Z M Q Cn Cc W J Q �I r El Qc Ol c O C'7 Q N O •- 0 Z Q m �O , LJ El8 o 0 8 0 w El El bti®O O �o El El b®o El e ® o o Q eb�o El El Elbaoo BED El l 0 E:i eE:i H O�bOo w o 0 v�� Z Q°i Q U 'O OLU C�� Uo LU . 2w u (D �Q Qry 0 ry Z m LU Z ry � O W w 0 12:D LU 12 n lqq- Q~ uO Z Lr) =OM Q p 00 �o-,q NCp, 058 • .• e OZ = « l •37VJS Ln 0 U Lu Lu c� U Lu \ \ 0 z LU J (n 2 w cl < H Cn U) Q - Q W w m m O C CV I� L QLLJ ooL cfl - CS o O o Q O m Q L 2 U) Z z E O L LU LLJ � 00 Z U L U O i o = < U z � O Of a w L O = O LL-H =0E5C Cn U r 0 J OJ m J ❑ J = LL_ �0 O o 0 El LL mw g Z L� O LU ElLn o LU J j Ln ❑ LU ~ Z o � LU LL 00 Q z� LL JO � m 2 Oz Q N z z O Q N O Z Q > Cl) w o w w US Q m Z:J�� =� m O- m � Q O co N w !=o Cl) w U) -o-) LLJ �?Qo � o OCN LU w z LU N �w >¢ aZ w > Z =O 00 00 H U o N Cj 000 0 m ? U rn z ` co D 0 Hv w U)vHrn �oQZ > owa� z Li i J 09 U o N- Mg8a a D- iunoo IIVHSIIVW El El (n El ww ~ El C) U)U) ❑ B ix z�LU Ll LU Zw W } D 0 H El Q COm W U 9 O M U W W U Q Q J (DQ= W El Z W O w� LuW � 19 W Q w w n� vz �LL w JU )< Q LnwZ U�w � �ZOO O ❑� U W U) Lo (n(A �U�? �C) D W W W =O of LL W <Wu)<J W or-OU W O 0 Z Z U) z Q El Of ❑ 2 Q�❑�� z oz z J�o zz zoww a �o<?8w�? u E] CL oo C) C) o('/) U oQ2' D o Jww Y ❑ �OUOZOZC) LLJ ~ U) Fw-- Zw: LU LU n LU' w � n cwi) n❑ Z W LJL Q of �❑ ❑ ow cA— O}ZcnOcnJ�C� ❑ ❑ W w2zct) ��J��OUw2��00 �O� w Z 0 0 � O Q 2 0-U J U m m O m w Q❑ Q J Cn L- w U� U O U 2 JJ Q 0-Q H Q W Y W LL LL 0 z u ❑ El r) El❑ v Lo El ❑ El❑ ❑ ❑ 00 ❑ ❑ o rn ~ � W CL 8 8 co CY) z CL CD N 0 ti CA F g 3 C w a� a Q a LU V Z U w U C0 Q Z w ¢ Q z p Q Cn o M w U ZLli U U m rn !�! M Z 3>� > M w Z Z� 6) O i a m ' 2 Q Q N Z 2i Q Cl) � Q a Q k CSJ Z OQ V� CO �oU o (LY'jOos o�rn JwUti Lo V OULLo U N LL Cl) Lb (� N L() U Vq< UBWC� LU 0 C� oUNO L f� N Q Q v UNwCi XZ ti cnXOL� zM C-, Z Ln Oo LU �� oQ QO=rn m 06'0 LLJ Q U=rn Q Z J mJ omU Z Lu CD L) v Z O �� D LULU o�� O Q oo o> o 00 n Z oo � Q oo � 0 000 d � °° V C) � � Joy W m LL C) 0 � Q H O Z JO Ow LU w LJJ m Q U � � ZD w LL O00 C/j o Z QC) qz LU r F- C)"' Q Z Q Now LL J Cn C)0 NI 0' O OzLu ZCL zLU U) 0��zmOw m N 1 Cn Q C/) CD �Z C� 0 < C:LU w � U U U Q Q Qg�zm�� Ov Lu LL— o Cn Z W O C� C) F o 0 zoQQo O C) U � U o= W=¢ C/) U Z z � m O >- 00 0') o U CN C2 LU � Lij Z z Z �Q C� U Cl) 'Cl) lN N W CO Fo U) U rn w Lu¢rnrn Q Z W oZ U CL LL M U U r-o N Z Ma C� Cr LU J J O ° Q V M S Ova �l 10 WE SA sue' \ \AN \ \ w(.0 z` L) \ I LL \ V A 1> \ .s o\ \ O� w\ \ Z O \ oA, ifi A \ M o Y ' U y w LU _ LU U) ❑ 0 El Ll o 0 ❑ 0 0 0 0 b El El O �o El 00�0 H El b ® o ®0�0 El ❑ ba00 8 ®o®oo �HeE:i 8 0 0 o P it � '� LJJ *SO *so o �^ 0000 v N C>, O C>l wo U QZ �w� 00 poi v I ,< �-- C�e U o LU F V) rLu UV z �Q Qo O ry O z Q z 0!� H J Q U Q Z O Q U U O U Z Q N �O N O41_, Q U LU Z O I O v LU Lu OLU Z 0 Q z Lo lqll- Lr) =O� V) F— ::D 00 Q � 00 �O� �N� C/� N Cp, 059 H F- Zo Q Q DO Y cl J m z 00 LL W Cn 2 W O J❑ W �WM Q J rY = W W U�<�z�� o� ❑ a J m� W p m m 0 0 0 O ❑❑ W W O Cl) Q Q D H _ - - O W LL D LU W J Ll � Z Ll LU z W U J Z Y Q W rn W Q O U m W U p M U W W W ❑U U � Z O )L p Q v O o� Z H H ❑ O Q !Y Z O w Q J U Q= W M 0 co Cl)w= �o ~ o ~ W OJ � z w❑o wz �O Q ��<��QW ❑ 0�i LL, O (] Q QU�*zo00 QS T z ~2❑� Q "'wzwLr,v�w �~ w L w LU m 0Y OU m MCOW7 ❑� �W J�UQ Z) W W 2Zg-jOW T LL N = Q J Q Z Q J (lam M p ❑ L� O U ? p IL W< M 0 Q J (� Q 37VOS Q 0 (� c� w cn cn cn Z U Q w < U — .�� Z U= w Z 2E� �LL cnz zH zJv)O o 7 El =Q�, D 0 U O z w o w o LU 00 z 0- �cn �p�� w m~0Qw Z El Cj) O W = ¢ z 0 > c~i) Q ZQ OQ�O 00 Oc0nww Z) 0—w u WCl W m z Z 0 LU U z 0 W wg a—aU UU U-Q� ❑ �p(-)o zY O NI J o U U U> m Oz �Uww ww w ❑� w — ZJQ�pcn _2cD_=¢�M Cep Z��n�� w p❑cn❑❑❑wQa El Of �� Q U v, Q Z Q U Q N z W w0cn�cncO COwZcnocnJWo ❑❑ W❑❑ U U) � U = cn o `� z cn� ❑ W Q J�wa- wQO� ��00 Z W cn oZ U 0 = rY w rY p 0 Q� W wgzcn�cncn�cn� Jcn�p��UW2�Hpp pp CN cn 0 - W � L, > Z CO WO �OQ2U22Q2 WQ ❑UtYUOU� ZJJ H O O Q U O O p J w m� O dUJ�Q�HJH(n C W QdQ�Q W �� W LL LL � ¢� LU �Z wz W=moo=� Q =Cn ❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ n ❑ o❑❑ L C� CL LUw CO COm0 m �Q z ❑ch �� Li El oo rn �= U� O U)w Z Q C:)Lij C) U O C) Q Q oft �zm�� o oo�� 0w"�� LU C) s o 00 co �- CY) Cl)Z / CN O CD 0 C75 w - U)C) a V o °i a g 3 a� Z v m o �v0 Q Z v � W v p v O Lu w w Q N C0 O Z W < Q z C) w !_, Q CO Q Z w 0000 Mclq Z w W Cl) C.0 Of Z U W M CDco N >cn O >� >M Wo z z W >_ Z U 0p Q N CN 0.) Q 0 Q - p m C) 0-) W Q Q m O k LL mcfl o°°o 0U OQ � Co C) 000 M SwUti min VOOU� U�'0 OH N m D Q Cn N LL CO � re � N > L U C4 OO Z�� W U U v W CV W M Q N = CL) U N O LL r` N Q v > U N— J OQ rn u ~WU XZ r` cnXpr-L ZCh CN OZ�, O � p 0U HO = of m O N QO=00 �ofrn Cr) W m C) U N o LLi a �Li J U Q C. Z p CD Q Lii J eo m J o m U o Z w `r' °° m o U Z Z N Z O v Z O 4 p 0 0 Z rn o> rn o Z rn o Z rn W W o O U oM ¢ _ o w O Q o Q rn O o Q _ ? z N CA lL Q O VVV tZ v CL lZ' I� J I� LL `. z i � U l) Cl)am'lN N w rn co Q v U) Urn w WQ 0) � Q Z W O Z U IL LL M U) U OL O N Z Ma Cfl � C W J Q M M �� - M M M M O 21f1� '1SIX3 0 / 8 21f10 '1SIX3 \ \ �- S S - S S S - b' ` �� S - > a$ rsS N M _ � Q l c� M \ (\I LSV:l M M M:qnLLI MVJ SZV3�� r� M M M V M- 3 LU > \ LU o W+sz a a oo+sz ; x> a oo+vz a \oo+sz a in U VCO) _ CO) � °� 11 Eli\ -0 LU G -----— fA — N� -- ---- ---W ---�------- — U—�---- N—----------� --- — — W--- ----- N X W I U a N M O �\ CL O O Zcn O Q I \ 0 d d LHOIS J0 All — — — — — — — — — tO ,L6'1106- \ ,9f 95£ — — — — — 6 M \ M \ M M M ❑ ❑ O sunD ISIX3 \ W W w_ � S \�u_ S 0 x O x \ o 1 �B �� \ AV M w � Lu �_ \ Y 00+Sz \ N w OO+LZ, cn > M II 23, w - - — — — — — — — — — — — — — — - — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — N CV) DOT \ CN Cl) W x Lu m--- \� — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — --------f�, — Z 0 \ \ O LL H W W CO W W CO 0 z m O I z O H J Q , LJ LU (D 0 II— U LU U Q LU 12 ElE o 0 ]000 ❑ ��® l oEl 0 El b®o El ®o�o ❑❑ ❑®o® ❑ baoo 8 ®o®oo E:i eE:i Boo D�boo O z m m ,4 W z 060 U M/2i '1SIX3 CO b Q I J W' W O UJ a Q O� W m>O g a > 06 (-)o W cn of Z CY] 0-LU W QO M/?] d 02i d o0 — — — — v I I M I I-1 Novo13S 'dObd `Y' f IIII. O U co Z a ro W W J a U b co blM W b CO Z co z g Q Qui U)ui wa w Q U U) i 2 W w O U co Z a a w CA W I Y U a W > O 2 w W U 06 m D Z m U CL O aW W d QO w J a U co MAVONnos H z W W oU) w W U o w (� O Q OJ > Z Q J I W 0 m d O 0 U)o ZN d u.. 0 - "'1, 3NIIMOI3 — Al JVGNn08 Hlnos Z o U- m U) [L Z O W CL T- M 3NIIMOI3 W Z J C W Of z O a > W W p z n U 75; Lu U) a w M Z Qo Y Of CD 0 z O -j > uj 1- W 0 a 0 N Of 0- Q U Z M U f- X W 0 N M LO W II Ow Q W co n W z W a ( N a W c� N Of W� W II O w _ Q 11111= U cn - IIIII CO bow Q� -- _ -- o z Iwij dMid � LU 0iQ ILI IIIIII `°' 'I�II�IITI: No`d813S 'dO2Jd — — — =T=11 U El J 17 z a — c [if —� ; II— m o U- III-Z _o o _) ~ a Z LLJ J W 0 a d z O F= a W O OJ LU J Z W J U- Z Z Cn a_ p Z J LL, m m mod: M c9 III11 IIII IIII N _ III w—III �-- > I11�1 co co N N wF)cMo(P co 00 ~av° W I� co06ci O C'7 w > a 0) o w N �O 0 0 i< 2 ?oIL� CD N 00 Z U) U O FL° w 0 �a O Z co LU O J i O � V lei •• W o o Z O J I O w LL L R II Z� Ow J w `� cA 0 W W-I III- oz R II zo g ° M Z W :;�z w �III- O J pw o —III- III- U � w �_ ¢� =1 co - z III - II III 'NIA %Z@_ z o N 3NIIMOI3 1= a m IIII °° II Uw 1I 1 IIII a z z� a M J m O - LL O W ZCO Of O CL Of m Z W z o O z � o " w 0 m U) zw L, J W a W w J a U Cn W Z) Z W Q of J o f- CO N CO C) a w W _ 1-- U a U W o Q0 �O N IIII XVA Zlvo 'NIW .,V0'0 _ l— Lu t Y Ni N 1 v —III- o OtfI v I I I_ a_ —I w o a ° —III— orf Z III-11 z � —I 11= o -11111 w U > El x I I I I—, III R w g z< � c U LO > co811� CD a W _III- R II - - — - - Z LU -III ~ o p Jb d02�d Q I I IIII- CO `o _ �. w U) „s -1II1111 � I- =11=1 co -1II—I M � NOVOi3S `dObd a z—�T o 1 m o 1- z - O Cn W' W Z LL Lu J Q a IZ co z El E o 0 ❑ 8 0 0 0 ❑ ��El El ®O O El o j 08�0 b ®o El e ®o 0 � o i o 0 e �o 0® 0® Elbaoo oo®o 8 Elo o ❑ El eo 8 0 0 O 0 b o ❑ w No 0 00 00 ZQ°i Q U 'O LU OC�� Z_ Uo w . 2w UZ �Q Q� 0 0 Z N /N1 V , Q U W z O v I O UJ uw OV) w I..L 7 L+ J O I F— ::D 00 Q Q 00 I..L O �N� C/� N OZ, 061 31VOS Ol lON b A AAXAA 3nN3 `d A2i2J3HO 12�381 _3 O U w} 0 0 Ljj LU m W J Z w¢ a p w Z Q Q Q O z O M 3nN3_f/ Q isvA wz J_ w Q 3nNAOV J J SN3'b`dJ O m z � DI❑ O6 �w o❑zcId❑ -in = Ay U w�G III LO i� D Ir a U Q E Z J O 3n 3_d U 2�31 3H�02� Q ry O 0O J J U � ry LL 0M7>-� U), LLJ CO W O w z� z Q F— _j Cn Q r �Z Q U LL L No 0 w , Q CN wl b Ow< CL � Z W m N I Cn c c CL z Q2iofw m O� J �Oco 0 Uz ) � Z Q 0 LUry U QLL �o z OJ Z ::D m Lo � o Vow�� 0 J � zLL Q0 O �� o ZU v� Woco U m O U) = Q o U Z CD z m 00 r w m C-4 0 N T F— LLI z ZD U Q w F- z N CD Li U I— w w U) w w U) O o O LU Cn � W t —Z>WQ� Of _ „l -77vis � w W 9 W CQ w W aJ�w<ca C ❑ Q z Q� Q Q Z Y v)UZ=ow8❑ Z U) z QZ�?U❑❑❑❑ �! WJw�OU�b J J m Z L O Q ❑ 00 =- F Z�o �® U mUa.Q�U0�w 0 E 0 o o M w LU W � 0U) N� WCo Z aU �> �L� co _ C 00 Z) OD U N Q N M o' 0) CO Q p Q �_ W O U H U Q ~ w Q Q� z Z Z Um 0 z Z z O a:O o o Cncv9�L)d a Qv:OL)a ElE o 0 ]000 ❑❑ b�02 O El El 08�❑ H b ®o LL ®�� 8 El L o o U El o®o® ❑ baoo 8 El El 0 0 �HeEi O Boo� b o ❑ O O N O w (Q O a 0: to UU0)m Q rnLU rn Q Z W O z 0 � O a � LL M mCO U K o � U N Z o Q rn Cc �I J J_ LL ❑ 00 ❑ 00 El El J_ LL S 7t 0') 19 ❑ LL 00 00 CY) It LO C`7 00 O El El El w tj w o 0 0 LO El o � e w❑ � CDEl o 8 o 0 z 0 O co N 0 N O •- Q � C) O 'i' u w No 0 No SO v�� Z °", 011, Q< co U 'O OLU CD� U o w . V) 2w u (D r)0000Q QrV 0 ry O Z m LU Z ry O � O W w 0 N w n lqq Q~uO ZLO =OM Q p 00 �o� 062 31VOS Ol lON b AAA♦A 3nN3 `d A2i2J3Ho 12�381 _3 o U wm} O LU Ljj LUJ w Z NnNE-V O < z � O� Q isvA Cl� wz J w Q 3nNAOV J SN3'b`dJ O m z � J Nolol❑ O ❑zcId❑ -inoo = w �G� Ay re,U w III LO i� D Ir a U Q z E J 0 3n 3_d U 2�31 3Ho02� N 0 Q Z ry O 0O J J U � ry LL 0M7>-� U), LLJ CO LUO u z� Z Q � ry Q r � Q zZ U LL No O CO, Q wl 0z(D n CL CL Z LU 00 m NI U) � CL Z Q2i8fw m O� C) co LL O Z �U) — Z Q 0 LUry OL U Q� O Z O � m LO �Z 00� VOwO� 0 J � ZLL o0 75 71 O ZU v� Woco U m 0 U) = Q o U Z CD Z m 00 r w m O 0 N T F— Lu z ZD U Q w F— z ,O _ „l -77VOS 0 0 i ME U U 0 rn r� v H J =D J U E 1 s s Nf L6•LLOt Sd r S O s \� Li U 8LO W 00 w w pp \ SZ'6 o \ gs•� N d`� �_�1 vJ ♦ �n�`Y °O N \ ♦ cOFp `�16 o w w el \ co 0000\ yy a 8s °° O O N O w rn �QFlo U) U m m LLiQ rn rn a z iu 0 z _ � O xQ U U D- w EC M m U �o � U N Z O Q rn uj J J O V J J_ LL C) U 00 o 00 0 ` U W 0') r It J J_ L.L � ❑ w ❑ � T- ItI, 9p ❑ LL U)Nt 00 00 co LO M 00 CD El U � H El El H W W o Lc> 1 El9 ❑ H 0 NT El �H H H W ❑ o 0 � O El Z ElE o 0 ]000 ��®OEl O lEl El b ® o El Ho®o o Q eboo El El ❑ baoo oo®o 8 ®oEl ��e� Booty O P ito ❑ � w �O oCY) '^0000 v N01, O� ' ^ O O -'0 wo U Qz �w� 0 o 0 (D '^ Z U 0 LU V) LU (D n0000 Uz Q rV O Z Q Z Q::� H J U (D O Q U U O U Z Q N 111O N 0-1 Q U w Z_ 0 O ICY) LU w OV) Z � 0 QZLO LO =O� � 0000 Q 00 W _ �O� N �- 063 31b'OS Ol lON 3m3AV).2i 3H0 o AMNd o 1.12i381� '3 LU LUZ } � U)O ui m U m� ¢ � Of w O � O O Q � 2 Q o Mid o 3nN3AV 1SV3Ui "N w z J_ � w Q 3nN3AV VaNVM113 NI SN302JVJ VI2 MIA w z w Q J CIH VA3in08 332J0 AVO U) J co LU J 2 J elf of Q U O � of O 3nN3AV 31S3HOO ry \ \ o 0 D \ \ \ wO \ \ ♦ CL m \\ \ cl wLU ,^ Z W W W zoo Z W W Lu O ft LU QZ>L= W W VJu)�QmLU 0 Z Co W LuY > U c O z c) z<>o< - Ww> LO � aZaCDo LU D M Z p w 2 U O N 06 N �Lu U WJWm=U"Mo E=U �zoffoDa�w0 fE arn azaoZz - 0_jo0o° - >a0 �>oC wc)aMGc)a p v�(cI Q v o , ry v \ ('O v 00 LU 0 Lu o00 LL N o. w , < Lu z00ry< JaZmNI CL � z m �=UC/)o0z :a�) Wm<0YU)LL] �U) V��C)cQ Qo00�ti m "::t_ Sri UjO Z O wv � U o LL c — o O�zLL LL Q O oz o ZU> wU o m O U) Q = U o Z Q z w co 6, m o 0 N Ld Z 0 U Q LU z H LU w w 0 W w IS, C7 c9 rn Q H � rn Q0 wOU(~j ti =o�<w v C) OS Q71T000- Q a (D I = ui J W 2� J w w L W Cm G ZD z 0 N O co LLI LLI LL t-dn- N;2w o® El�o EE:l0 L 0 bo ❑ ❑ 0080 ® b®o¢ HoE2 o` o ❑ El LL Q0 0 8 ❑ o ❑ H 8 ®0 H 0 ❑ o 0 BoEl oth O�bHo O O N O Cl) � M cli co w(0 (.0 W 0rn 0i `Qrnrn a z w O z cr U w LL co m U [=o w U N z O Q � cr LU J O Q-� C U L � ,c lei • W ♦ ; o Off, v v\ v d�� w Q O z o \ \ LO T v \ vv vv\ \ \ v ♦ O v O s CO � w� �O �O o� (')0000 N O-1 0 011.1 • Q co Q wo U Qz �w� �O 0 v I U o LU V) = rLU V Uz rQ Qry O N� I..fi O Z lqq Z O H J Q U Q C� Z O Q U U O I U Z Q N r- 1110 01-1 U w Z O O LU w 0 L/,) :21-- 0 QZLO LO F— =or V F— CL ) 0000 Q C) 00 W _ F— N� �N� 064 SEE ABOVE RIGHT Fm MAVJ��HAL. COURT FOOTHILL BLVD. SEE BELOW LEFT '86l L I /I '9611 •A r� WALKWAY WITH PARALLEL BIKE BUFFER LANE TWO WAY LEFT TURN LANE TREE WELLS PARKING LANE 5- 5' EAST AVENUE TENTATIVE TRACT No. 20148 (NMADOLE g -RANCHO AVE.,, O[ ASSOCIATES, INC. ,.,; 1.6322 Engineering Communities for Life FAX: 909.481.6320 066 STIFF REPORT DATE: October 11, 2017 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Candyce Burnett, City Planne(q9 INITIATED BY: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner SUBJECT: PRE -APPLICATION REVIEW DRC2017-00674 — STRATHAM HOMES — A request for a Planning Commission Workshop to review a proposed mixed -use development of 131 residential units (with 4 commercial ready units) and 1,592 square feet of commercial space on 11.45 acres of land in the Community Commercial (CC) District, located on the west side of East Avenue and north of Foothill Boulevard — APN: 1100-191-04. PROCESS: The Pre -Application Review process provides a project proponent the opportunity to present conceptual designs to the Planning Commission prior to formal application submittal in order to receive broad, general comments and direction. The focus of the meeting is a discussion by the Planning Commissioners regarding the technical and design issues related to the project. The meeting is not a forum for debate and no formal decision or vote is made. After the meeting, staff prepares written comments summarizing the direction of the Commission and staff, which are sent to the applicant. PROJECT SETTING. The 11.45-acre project site is located on the west side of East Avenue and north of Foothill Boulevard. The site is made up of 3.76 acres of developable land that is unencumbered by easements, 2.03 acres encumbered by a Southern California Gas Company easement and 5.65 acres encumbered by a Southern California Edison easement. The property is zoned Community Commercial (CC) District and is within the Foothill Boulevard Overlay District. The dimensions of the generally triangular shaped property are approximately 685 feet along the south property line, 1,077 feet along the east property line, 385 feet along the west property line and 970 feet along northwest property line. The site gently slopes from north to south and is covered by low vegetation and multiple eucalyptus trees. The site is located within walking distance (less than 114 mile) from an Omnitrans bus stop, which serves Route 66 along Foothill Boulevard. The site is also along the future Omnitrans West Valley Connector Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Route, which is anticipated to provide express bus service with limited stops between the cities of Pomona and Fontana. SURROUNDING LAND USES AND ZONING: Surrounding Land Uses: To the north, across multiple utility easements, is single-family residential development within the Low Medium (LM) District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. To the south is Exhibit B 067 Cl—Pg1 PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP STAFF REPORT PRE -APPLICATION REVIEW DRC2017-00674 — STRATHAM HOME October 11, 2017 Page 2 vacant land that is approved for a 193-unit mixed -use development within the Mixed Use (MU) District. To the east, across East Avenue, is single-family development within the City of Fontana. To the west are multiple utility easements with a City park, Garcia Park, beyond. There is a Cucamonga Valley Water District pumping station that is located along the south property line. General Plan and Zoning: The existing land use designation in the General Plan is Mixed Use. The existing zoning designation is Community Commercial (CC) District and Foothill Boulevard Overlay District. The proposed mixed -use development will require a Development Code and Zoning Map Amendment to change the zoning designation and land use tables and figures from Community Commercial (CC) District to Mixed Use (MU) District. PROJECT OVERVIEW Proiect Design and Layout: The project involves the development of a two and three-story mixed use development made up of 131 residential units (72 one -bedroom and 59 two -bedroom units), 4 commercial ready units (305 square feet each) that are attached to one bedroom residential units and a 1,592-square foot commercial space. The project will have a density of 22.6 dwelling units per acre. The density calculation was based on the 3.76-acre area of the project site unencumbered by easements and the 2.03 acre Southern California Gas Company easement, to be used to fulfill the parking requirement for the project. The maximum permitted density in the Mixed Use (MU) District is 50 dwelling units per acre, The applicant has informed staff that the project is intended to be a rental community to be owned and operated by the applicant. The commercial ready spaces are designed to be used either as commercial space or as a second bedroom for the attached residential unit. The 1,592-square foot commercial space is located within the single -story leasing office/recreation building. Three-story residential buildings, along with the commercial units, will directly face East Avenue. Three-story residential buildings will also form a triangle around a common courtyard at the center of the project site. Two-story carriage units will be located adjacent to the south property line and the utility easement that runs along the northwest property line. All units will be single -floor flats accessed by exterior staircases or ground level walkways. The recreation/leasing office, commercial space and pool and spa will be located at the northeast corner of the site. Two gated vehicle access drives will be provided along East Avenue, with non -gated guest/customer parking provided adjacent to the leasing office and commercial space. The applicant has provided preliminary front and side architectural elevations for the 3-story residential units (including the commercial ready units) and for the leasing office/commercial unit. Floor plans of each unit type and the commercial ready and commercial units have also been provided. The units range in size from 675 to 830 square feet for the 1-bedroom units and 722 to 1,137 square feet for the 2-bedroom units. Recreational amenities will include a pool and spa. BBQ facilities, clubhouse, common open space areas and multiple court sport areas (volleyball, cornhole, badminton, bocce ball, horse shoes). Parking: The project is required to provide 282 parking spaces, 131 of which are required to be provided in the form of a garage or carport. Required parking includes tenant and guest parking for the residential portion of the development, as well as parking for the commercial and commercial ready units. The 1,592-square foot commercial space and the commercial ready units were parked at the office/retail parking rate (1/250 gross square foot), The project is required to provide 1 garage/carport parking space for each 1 and 2-bedroom unit, or 131 spaces based on Cl—Pg2 068 PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP STAFF REPORT PRE -APPLICATION REVIEW DRC2017-00674 — STRATHAM HOME October 11, 2017 Page 3 the proposed unit breakdown. The project provides 126 garage parking spaces, a 5-space deficiency. One hundred forty-seven (147) of the required parking spaces are located on a Southern California Gas Company easement, for which the applicant has received an initial acceptance letter (Exhibit D) to allow parking on the easement. The applicant also proposes permitting street parking on the west side of East Avenue, similar to the approved mixed -use project to the south. This will net up to 18 additional parking spaces adjacent to the commercial and commercial ready tenant spaces. These parking spaces are not counted in the parking analysis below as they are not on the project site. Park ng Analysis Multi -family units one bedroom Number of Units Square Footage Parking Ratio Required Parkin 72 NIA 1.5 per unit, 1 in garage or carport 108 Multi -family units two bedrooms 59 NIA 2 per unit, 1 in garage or carport 118 Visitor parking (multi-family)131 NIA 1 per 3 units 44 Commercial/Office NIA 1,592 1 per 250 square feet 7 Commercial Read NIA 1,220 1 per 250 square feet 5 Total Parking Spaces Required 282 Total Parking Spaces Provided 283 Total Parking Spaces on Easement 147 Total Garage Parking Spaces Provided/Required 126/131 Garage Parking Deficient -5 STAFF COMMENTS: Staff is generally in support of the proposed 131-unit mixed -use development, with the main concern being the proposed parking on the utility easement. The triangular shape of the project site and the multiple on -site utility easements result in a project site that is challenging and contains several site constraints. The multiple utility easements reduce the developable portion of the overall site from 11.45 acres to 3.76 acres, necessitating parking on the utility easement in order to provide parking for the proposed number of dwelling units. Eliminating parking on the utility easement_ would greatly reduce the number of units that could be developed on the project site. This would make it difficult to layout a mixed -use development with three-story buildings, similar to the approved mixed -use project to the south, and limit the fiscal viability of the proposed commercial and commercial ready units. Staff supports the request to allow on -street parking similar to the project to the south. The on -street parking will provide parking in close proximity to the commercial units, will provide a buffer between the vehicle traffic and the dwelling units and will slow south bound vehicle traffic. Staff is in support of the proposed Zoning Map and Development Code amendments to change the zoning designation of the project site from Community Commercial (CC) to Mixed -Use (MU), in conformance with the General Plan Mixed -Use land use designation. The General Plan land use designation of both the project site and the 8.8 acre approved mixed use project to the south were included in a General Plan amendment which changed the land use designation on a number of properties throughout the City that was approved by the City Council on June 15, 2016. 069 Cl—Pg3 PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP STAFF REPORT PRE -APPLICATION REVIEW DRC2017-00674— STRATHAM HOME October 11, 2017 Page 4 The project will complement the approved 193-unit mixed -use development to the south and will create a vibrant street frontage, utilizing three-story residential buildings and commercial units directly facing East Avenue. The 4 proposed commercial ready units and the 1,592 square foot commercial spaces will also complement the 3,246 square feet of commercial/live work units approved at the Corner of Foothill Boulevard and East Avenue. The proposed architecture is rather generic in design and will need to be enhanced. Staff recommends that the applicant choose a recognizable architectural style and provide design elements and building materials to accurately capture the chosen architectural style. It is also strongly recommended that roof and wall plane articulation be added to the building elevations facing the drive aisles to create visual interest. The proposed layout, with a continuous drive aisle around the central core of the project site, creates a street scene that is dominated by the garage doors. The site plan should be redesigned to create more convenient connections between the residential units along the periphery of the project site and open space area at the center of the project site. The pedestrian pathways currently cut diagonally across the vehicle drive aisles at a number of locations, creating awkward pedestrian crossings. Staff is also concerned that the proposed 5 stall, enclosed garage space deficit will make it difficult to provide the required 125 cubic feet of exterior lockable storage per unit. DISCUSSION OUTLINE: The following comments are meant to frame and facilitate input by the Commission. Staff recommends that the Commission provide comment and input on the following issues, and contribute additional comments as the Commission sees fit: 1. Land Use: Determine if the Commission supports the applicants request to amend the Zoning Map and Development Code to change the zoning designation of the project site from Community Commercial (CC) to Mixed -Use (MU) in conformance with the General Plan Mixed -Use land use designation. 2. Land Use Makeup: Determine if the 4 commercial ready units (305 square feet each) and 1,592 square feet of dedicated commercial space is an adequate level of commercial space in relation to the 131 proposed residential units for the Mixed Use (MU) zoning designation. Staff is of the opinion that the small size of the developable portion of the project site (3.76 acres) and the isolated proximity of the project site from the majority of commercial development along Foothill Boulevard make the project site a challenging location to add a greater square footage of commercial tenant spaces_ As a comparison, the approved project to the south includes 193 residential units and 3,246 square feet of commercial/live-work space. 3. Layout: Determine if the project layout is acceptable with the majority of parking provided on the utility easement and not in close proximity to many of the units that they serve. Staff requests input regarding the pedestrian connections and if they provide a logical network throughout the project and a convenient connection to the central open space area. 4. Parking: Discuss the large number of parking spaces on the utility easement and the potential burden that could be created for the residents and the surrounding residential streets, if and when maintenance is required on the underlying utility. Staff is of the opinion C1—Pg4 070 PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP STAFF REPORT PRE -APPLICATION REVIEW DRC2017-00674 — STRATHAM HOME October 11, 2017 Page 5 that the 5-stall enclosed parking space deficiency will create an issue with providing the required 125 cubic feet of required storage space and convenient parking to the impacted units. 5. Architecture: Discuss the proposed preliminary architecture and determine if it should be enhanced. Staff recommends that the applicant select a recognizable architectural design theme and provide design elements and building materials that complement the chosen architectural style. 6. Open Space and Amenities: Comment on the appropriateness of the location of the multiple court games on the utility easement between parking spaces and the back side of the carriage units. Consideration should be given to enlarging the clubhouse to provide a workout room and to provide a small dog park. The Development Code open space and recreational amenities requirements are as follows: a. A minimum of 150 square feet of open space area, per unit, shall be provided. Based on the unit count (131 units), a minimum of 19,500 square feet of open space shall be provided, of which no more than thirty percent (30%) can be used towards the private open space area. The conceptual plans do not provide enough detail to indicate if this requirement is met. b. A total of 5 recreational amenities are required for a 131-unit residential project. This can include amenities such as pools, spas, fitness rooms, club rooms, barbeque facilities with seating area, and other amenity types specified in Section 17.36.010 (E). REQUIRED ENTITLEMENTS: The development of a mixed -use project will require the following entitlements: 1. Zoning Map Amendment — $9,737 2. Development Code Amendment— $6,873 3. Tentative Tract Map $15,512 (Condominium Map - If Determined Necessary) 4. Design Review - $11,454 5. Initial Environmental Study - $2,921 6. Uniform Sign Program - $2,239 7. Tree Removal Permit - $846 8. Minor Exception (Parking) - $549 NOTE: Fees are subject to change by Council Resolution. PUBLIC ART: Residential projects with greater than 4 units and commercial projects with a valuation of greater than $1.000,000 are required to install public art or pay an in -lieu fee of $750 per residential unit and $1 per square foot of commercial space. The City prefers that the public art be installed on the project site. The public art will be reviewed as part of the Development Review process. 071 C1—Pg5 PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP STAFF REPORT PRE -APPLICATION REVIEW DRC2017-00674 — STRATHAM HOME October 11, 2017 Page 6 SPECIAL STUDIES: The following special studies will be required at the time of formal submittal: 1. Ai{ Quality and Greenhouse Gas Study. 2_ Biological Resources (birds, mammals, reptiles, plants, flora and fauna habitat). Biological Resources study shall be peer reviewed. 3. Traffic Impact Analysis. 4. Cultural Resources Report (with Tribal Consultation per SB18 and A1352). 5. Noise Impact Analysis. 6. Photometric Analysis. 7. Parking Study (with third party review). 8. Water Quality Management Plan. 9. Fiscal Impact Analysis NOTE: Additional special studies may be required following the formal submittal of the required applications. CB,TVIIs Attachments: Exhibit A - Preliminary Conditions of Approval/Comments Exhibit B - Preliminary Site Plan Including Easements Exhibit C - Aerial Photo Exhibit D - SoCalGas Acceptance Letter Dated September 11, 2017 Exhibit E - Large Plans (Distributed under separate cover) C1—Pg6 072 Preliminary Conditions of Approval Building and Fire Comments 1. The fire lane must comply with the RCFPD Standard 5-1. It shall beat least 2 foot' wide and shall provide an undiminished 20 foot inside radius and a 46 foot outside radius. Turns cannot be incorporated into the 20 foot drives. 2. Provide the building data and CA Building Code analysis for allowable area, height, type of construction and fire resistive requirements for exterior wall and opening protection. Engineering Department Comments: 1. Additional dedication maybe required along East Avenue to accommodate the on -street parking. A 6 foot sidewalk is required when adjacent to a curb. 2. The site is located within Area 8 of the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Drainage Policy. The current fee is $39,999 per acre. 3. A final drainage study will need to be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of any Building Permits. Grading Comments: 1. A site plan was submitted for a pre -application review. At this pre -application review neither a conceptual grading and drainage plan, nor a preliminary water quality management site and drainage plan were available for review. When these documents are submitted, the Building and Safety Department, Grading Services, will provide comments. Please note that all proposed areas of construction and impervious surfaces outside of the property boundaries shall be shown on both the conceptual grading and drainage plan and the preliminary water quality management site and drainage plan. EXHIBIT A 073 Cl--Pg7 17 It • 10 R" 3 fi} ll #13ij 1 _ Lou Z 2 r, O Boa 0 E Z (n W V w ~ Y rl 2 > kY Z f }+ C C J W W- I d o LU 0 LU Q hL U U O I Z f, +�- Q Z Q LU O U - ? ; k Q w EXHIBIT B C1-Pg8 074 ^�' � I � � - � � 1�.�° -. � ma`s "�C3�'�"". �•. ■7^ # '� py�° � �,'C-� + ' 4C)13, i I. SwWi 03- - -� 46 77 ., a .4 # , YN Lo 4' .lu - �_IJ PR jL -= 5 . I' `o a AVI 1 ♦ '4'+�-+.gym i nd�y-��w _ a, quamp to jr ArIBC * • �1� 5 .d44t f.#_ , }1' ii - '• R`... pry. Ck U. SCG Transmission General Requirements Brian Leal Gas Transmission Engineer SoCalGas 9400 Oakdale Ave ML SC9314 i A *Sempra Energy ul wy 9/11/2017 Brandon Roth Stratham Homes 2201 Dupont Drive Irvine, CA 92612 Plan File No. 0221-17-4000,4002 Proof of Review Subject- Rancho Etiwanada Preliminary Review Letter Chatsworth, CA 91311 Tel: 8187013201 Email: Bleal@semprautilities.com SoCalGas has received and reviewed the development plans at the Rancho Etiwanda Development and found the plans are consistent with the general vicinity. The preliminary plans do not illustrate any conflicts that would interfere with SoCalGas capability of operating and maintaining the existing transmission lines within the easement. Do Not Proceed with any grading, excavation or other construction activity within the pipeline easement area and/or within ten feet (10') of the pipeline. This letter does not constitute clearance for any construction work near or around SoCalGas' Transmission pipeJine(s), Paease refer to our Document Control Plan File 0221-17-4000, 4002 when providing grading plans, The following are general requirements that apply to your project please review these requirements along side your project plans and notify us about any questions or conflicts: • Consideration must be given to the safety of our pipeline(s) during a:l project stages. • SoCalGas must have continuous and uninterrupted access to the pipeline(s) and easement(s). In addition, SoCalGas conducts routine patrols and surveys of the pipeline(s); SoCalGas needs drivable access along the pipelines)/easement(s). • Buried pipelines must have a minimum cover of 3 feet and a maximum cover of 7 feet below finished grade, No change of grade whatsoever, even within these parameters, shall be made without prior approval of SoCalGas. • Prior to SoCalGas approving encroachment onto its easement(s), SoCalGas must be furnished with final grading plans showing the depth of the pipeline(s) below the existing surface and the depth of the pipeline(s) below the proposed finished grade. These elevations must meet SoCalGas' requirements for buried pipelines. EXHIBIT D Page 1 of 3 C1—Pg10 076 • No permanent structures, such as buildings, block walls, foundations, gates, etc., shall be constructed within the easement or over the pipeline(s). • There shall be no planting of trees or other deep-rooted plants within the easement(s) or over the pipeline(s). • Parallel encroachments within the easement(s) are prohibited. In areas where a parallel substructure is being constructed outside of the easement(s), SOCaIGas requires five feet of separation, with three feet of undisturbed fill, in order to protect the integrity of our facilities and allow the facilities to be safely accessed during inspection, maintenance, and repair. Additional separation may be needed for leach lines, fuel lines, high voltage electric, etc. • All encroachments onto SoCalGas' easement(s) must have written approval of SoCalGas prior to construction or encroaching onto the easement(s). • All work within the SoCalGas easement(s) and/or within 10 feet of the pipeline(s) must be witnessed by a SoCalGas representative, and no work will be allowed without the SoCalGas representative on site. • No heavy equipment shall cross the pipeline(s) without SoCalGas' approval. Additional protective measures may be required where heavy equipment is expected to cross the pipeline(s). • No mechanical equipment shall operate within three horizontal feet of the pipeline(s), and any closer work must be performed by hand. • No mechanical equipment shall operate within two vertical feet of the pipeline(s), and any closer work must be performed by hand. • No vibratory compaction is permitted over the pipeline(s). in rare cases, vibratory compaction may be approved by SoCalGas' Engineering Department following review of detailed site conditions, pipeline data, and equipment specifications. • All contractors and subcontractors must be notified of the presence of the pipeline(s). • Contractors and subcontractors must call DigAlert (811) at least 2 working days prior to construction, grading, or excavation. In addition to the above requirements, SoCalGas recommends the following: • Potholes should be made, as necessary, to establish the horizontal and vertical alignment of the pipeline(s) within the project area. This information should be indicated on the plans, as needed. CAUTION: SoCalGas personnel must be present during potholing operations. Arrangements for SoCalGas personnel to stand by during potholing activities can be made by calling DigAlert at 811. • Consideration should be given to building setbacks from the easement lines. A minimum 15 foot setback is recommended whenever possible. Page 2 of 3 077 C1—Pg11 • All potential buyers or tenants of the property should be made aware of the presence of the pipeline(s) and easement restrictions. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 8187013201. Sincerely, Brian Leal Page 3 of 3 C1—Pg 12 078 EXHIBIT E DISTRIBUTED UNDER SEPARATE COVER (FULL SIZE PLANS) 079 Cl-Pg13 080 OCTOBER PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP MINUTES RAINS ROOM RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA A. 7:00 P.M.* -CALL TO ORDER Roll Call: Chairman Oaxaca x 8:15 P.M. Vice Chairman Macias x� Commissioner Fletcher x Commissioner Munoz Commissioner Wimberly _x_ Additional Staff Present. Candyce Burnett, City Planner; Nick Ghirelli, Assistant City Attorney: Donald Granger, Senior Planner, Albert Espinoza, Asst. City Engineer; Lois Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary, - Mike Smith, Senior Planner; Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner, Kylie Miller, Office Specialist 11 B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Planning Commission on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Commission from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Commission may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals embers of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. None C. DISCUSSION ITEMS PLANNING COMMISSION C1. PRE -APPLICATION REVIEW DRC2017-00674 — STRATHAM HOMES — A request for a Planning Commission Workshop to review a proposed mixed -use development of 131 residential units (with 4 commercial ready units) and 1,592 square feet of commercial space on 11.45 acres of land in the Community Commercial (CC) District, located on the west side of East Avenue and north of Foothill Boulevard —APN: 1100-191-04. Page 1 of 5 081 OCTOBER PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP MINUTES RAINS ROOM RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner gave the staff report and PowerPoint presentation (copy on file). He noted that the pedestrian connections are at odd angles and one on the west is disjointed and there is a need for better connection with the units on the project site. He said the utility easement includes recreation opportunities and staff questions the location and access to the units_ He said the proposal provided 9 parking space over the minimum requirement but is 5 spaces deficient in covered parking -he said the storage requirement would not be met for those units. He said Staff feels the architecture is generic and is asking for a style to be chosen and move to that_ He reviewed the discussion outline and said that overall staff thinks it's a good project but there are a number of issues to overcome_ He said they could complement the development to the south with varied street fronts. Jeff Evans, Partner/Director of Land Development for Stratham Homes said they have over 1,000 units in the Inland Empire, the latest is Paloma. This one is named Westbury. He said a gym will be provided. He said they will prepare a parking study and they are not asking for a variance. He said since their most recent submittal, they changed the carriage units to provide each with a garage, satisfying the prior shortage of 5 covered spaces. He said the architecture is a combination of traditional and contemporary. He said the pedestrian connections have been modified. Commissioner Wimberly asked if there is a safety concern for pedestrians in the drive path. Mr. Evans said this condition exists in every apartment project that has a loop street. Commissioner Fletcher asked for clarification regarding what exists on the south side of the site. Mr. Evans responded, carriage units and a wall. Commissioner Munoz asked to clarify where the live/vvork units are located on East Avenue looking north_ Commissioner Wimberly asked if a live/work unit could be turned into a living space. Mr. Evans said if a person did not need the workspace, it could be a bedroom. He said he believes there will be a demand for work space. He said the parking on East Avenue is not included in the calculation. Candyce Burnett, City Planner, noted that the City Engineer and Assistant City Engineer determined there was not enough traffic on East Avenue to justify having two southbound lanes. Albert Espinoza, Assistant City Engineer said this project will have to do widening to tie into what was approved for project to the south. Page 2 of 5 082 OCTOBER PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP MINUTES RAINS ROOM RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA Commissioner Fletcher asked for confirmation regarding meeting the parking requirement. Mr. Evans confirmed every unit will have a garage, the plan has been revised to show 134 garages/there is no longer a shortage of garages. Mark Bertone said the existing street conditions on East Avenue are this; there are two southbound lanes and one northbound lane. Tabe van der Zwaag said there will be one lane each way on East Avenue in addition to the street parking on the southbound side. Mr. Evans remarked that it is handy to have parking right at the front door of the live/work units. Mr. Serafin Maranan, Principal Architects Orange said he met with Chief Ball to be sure the project meets the fire standards. He said one set of stairs is provided for 4 units, 37 units will have direct access from the garage. He said with respect to the architecture — transitional design was used to blend with the surroundings. Mr. Evans said they could add a pet area but there is the existing trail and Edison easement that could be used for this purpose. In response to Commissioner Munoz' concern about prying neighbors, Mr. Maranan said there are no windows overlooking the recreation areas located on the easement in the eastern portion of the project site_ Chairman Oaxaca asked if parking on the easement is assigned. Mr. Evans said it is, and guest parking is provided and spread throughout the project. Commissioner Macias asked what the long green strip along parking is. Mr. Evans indicated that it is landscaped area. Commissioner Macias said it is a clever design for difficult/challenging property. Commissioner Munoz said the design has some synergy with the project to the south. Mr. van der Zwaag said he likes the form, but there should be more specific architecture. Mr. Evans said they would work with staff on this issue. Page 3 of 5 083 OCTOBER PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP MINUTES RAINS ROOM RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA Commissioner Fletcher said the architecture to the south is contemporary and this is a good transition. He said it could be more contemporary. He said they did a good job with a difficult property. Commissioner Macias said he appreciated the preparation of the 3D drive-thru; it was helpful. Chairman Oaxaca suggested the applicants continue to work with staff. D. ADJOURNMENT 9:15 P.M. I, Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on October 5, 2017 seventy two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54964.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. Lois J. Schrader Planning Commission Secretary City of Rancho Cucamonga INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view_ To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the Page 4 of 5 084 OCTOBER PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP MINUTES RAINS ROOM RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA microphone. After speaking, please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium. It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under "Public Comments." There is opportunity to speak under this section prior to the end of the agenda. Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners. A copy of any such materials should also be provided to the Secretary to be used for the official public record. All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing. Requests for scheduling agenda items will be at the discretion of the Commission and the Planning Director. AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. These documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., except for legal City holidays. APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of $2,725 for all decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas, staff reports and minutes can be found at www.CitvofRC.us. Page 5 of 5 085 DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:00 p.m. Tabe van der Zwaag February 4, 2020 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2018-00770 — SC WESTBURY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP - A request for site plan and architectural review of a proposed mixed -use development that includes 131 residential units (with 4 commercial ready units) and 1,500 square feet of commercial space on 11.44 acres of land in the Community Commercial (CC) District, located on the west side of East Avenue and north of Foothill Boulevard — APN: 1100-191-04. Related records: Development Code Amendment DRC2018-00992, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2018-00994, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20148, Uniform Sign Program DRC2019-00959 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2019- 00867. A Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts has been prepared for consideration. Site Characteristics and Background: The 11.44-acre project site is located on the west side of East Avenue and approximately 550 feet north of Foothill Boulevard. The project site made up of 3.76 acres of land unencumbered by easements, 1.98 acres that are within a Southern California Gas Company easement that will be used for parking and 5.7 acres that are within a Southern California Edison easement that will be left undeveloped. The dimensions of the generally triangular -shaped property are approximately 685 feet along the south property line, 1,077 feet along the east property line, 385 feet along the west property line and 970 feet along the northwest property line. The site gently slopes from north to south and is covered by low vegetation and multiple eucalyptus trees. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Vacant Mixed -Use Community Commercial (CC) District; Foothill Boulevard Overlay District Subarea 4 North Utility Corridor Utility Corridor Low Medium LM District South Vacant Land Mixed -Use Mixed -Use MU District East Single -Family City of City of Fontana Residences Fontana West Utility Utility Corridor Commercial Office (CO) District Infrastructure General Plan and Zoning: The existing General Plan land use designation is Mixed Use. The existing zoning designation is Community Commercial (CC) District and Foothill Boulevard Overlay District (Subarea 4). The proposed mixed -use development will require a Development Code and Zoning Map Amendment to change the zoning designation and land use tables and figures from Community Commercial (CC) District to Mixed Use (MU) District. Project Design and Layout: The project is for the development of a two and three-story mixed -use development made up of 131 residential units (73 one -bedroom and 58 two -bedroom units), and 4 commercial ready units (305 square feet each), that are attached to one -bedroom residential units and a 1,500-square foot commercial space. The project will have a density of 22.58 dwelling units per acre. The density calculation is based on the 3.76-acre area of the project site unencumbered by easements and the 1.98-acre Southern California Gas Company easement, to Exhibit C 086 DRC COMMENTS DR DRC2018-00770 — SC W ESTBURY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP February 4, 2020 Page 2 be used to fulfill the parking requirement for the project. The maximum permitted density in the Mixed Use (MU) District is 50 dwelling units per acre. The applicant has informed staff that the project is intended to be a rental community that they will own and operate. The commercial -ready spaces are designed to be used either as commercial space or as a second bedroom for the attached residential unit. The 1,500-square foot commercial space is located within the single -story leasing office/recreation building, with the main entrance facing East Avenue. Three-story residential buildings, along with the commercial units, will directly face East Avenue. Three-story residential buildings will also form a triangle around a common courtyard at the center of the project site. Two-story carriage units will be located adjacent to the south property line and the Southern California Gas Company easement that runs along the northwest property line. All units will be single -floor flats accessed by exterior staircases or ground level walkways. The recreation/leasing office, commercial space and pool, and spa will be located at the northeast corner of the site. One gated and one ungated vehicle access drive will be provided along East Avenue, with non -gated guest/customer parking provided adjacent to the leasing office and commercial space. The residential units will range in size from 676 to 789 square feet for the 1-bedroom units and 1,021 to 1,174 square feet for the 2-bedroom units. Recreational amenities include a pool and spa, BBQ facilities, clubhouse, fitness room, common open space areas, and multiple sports court areas (volleyball, badminton, bocce ball, horseshoes). A larger triangular -shaped common open space is located at the center of the project site and will include communal seating areas with water features and fire pits. The parking spaces and recreational amenities on the easement area will only be landscaped with shrubs and ground cover as trees and other permanent structures are not permitted within the Southern California Gas Company easement area. The buildings will have a contemporary architectural design theme that will include the use of horizontal cement board siding, brick veneer, and stucco along with cable railings and metal sunshades. The common entrance ways to the individual units include brick veneer archways. The building materials are carried to all elevations (360-degree architecture) and each wall plane is well articulated. The private patios/decks range in size from 54 square feet to 100 square feet and each unit includes a minimum of 125 cubic feet of storage area in the garages as well as bicycle parking. A combination of block walls and wrought iron fencing is proposed around the project perimeter, with the main entrance from East Avenue located adjacent to the leasing office. The parking area and recreational amenities within the Southern California Gas Company's easement will not be fenced as structures are not permitted within the easement area. The project complies with each of the Development Code requirements for the Mixed -Use (MU) Residential District. Projects within mixed -use districts are permitted an up to 75 percent reduction in the streetscape setbacks with no minimum building separation requirements (beyond that required by the Building Code). 087 DRC COMMENTS DR DRC2018-00770 — SC W ESTBURY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP February 4, 2020 Page 3 Minimum/Max Requirement Proposed Compliant? Building Setback (East Avenue) 35 feet* 11 feet-9 inches Yes Building Setback Side Property Line 5 Feet 5 feet Yes Height Limit 50 40 Yes Landscape Coverage 10 Percent 26 Percent Yes Open Space Per Unit 150 Square Feet 364 Square Feet Yes Density 50 Units per Acre 22.58 Units per Acre Yes *Mixed -Use Projects are Permitted an Up To 75 Percent Reduction Parking: The project is required to provide 281 parking spaces, 131 of which are required to be provided in the form of a garage or carport. Required parking includes tenant and guest parking for the residential portion of the development, as well as parking for the commercial space and commercial -ready units. The 1,500 square foot commercial space and the commercial -ready units were parked at the office/retail parking rate (1/250 gross square foot). The project is required to provide 1 garage/carport parking space for each 1 and 2-bedroom unit, or 131 spaces based on the proposed unit breakdown. The project provides 134 garage parking spaces. One hundred forty-three (143) of the required parking spaces are located on the Southern California Gas Company easement, for which the applicant has received an initial acceptance letter to allow parking within the easement area. The applicant also proposes permitting street parking on the west side of East Avenue, similar to the approved mixed -use project to the south. This will net up to 18 additional parking spaces adjacent to the commercial and commercial ready tenant spaces. The street parking spaces are not counted in the parking analysis below as they are not on the project site. Parking Analysis Number of Units Square Footage Parking Ratio Required Parkin Multi -family units (one bedroom) 73 N/A 1.5 per unit, 1 in garage or carport 110 Multi -family units two bedrooms 58 N/A 2 per unit, 1 in garage or carport 116 Visitor parkin(multi-family) 131 N/A 1 per 3 units 44 Commercial/Office N/A 1,500 1 per 250 square feet 6 Commercial Ready N/A 1,220 1 per 250 square feet 5 Total Parking Spaces Required 281 Total Parking Spaces Provided 285 Total Parking Spaces on Easement 143 Total Garage Parking Spaces Provided/Required 134/131 Parking Surplus 4 088 DRC COMMENTS DR DRC2018-00770 — SC W ESTBURY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP February 4, 2020 Page 4 Staff Comments: Staff supports the proposed 131-unit mixed -use development with the only outstanding issue being the final design of the trash enclosures. The applicant has done a good job overcoming the constraints of the triangular -shaped project area, which includes multiple utility easements reducing the developable portion of the overall site from 11.44 acres to 3.76 acres. The limited size of the developable portion of the project site necessitates parking on the Southern California Gas Company utility easement in order to provide adequate parking for the proposed number of dwelling units. Staff supports both parking on the easement area as well as the proposed on - street parking, similar to the approved project to the south. The on -street parking will provide parking in close proximity to the commercial units, will provide a buffer between the vehicle traffic and the dwelling units and will slow southbound vehicle traffic. The project will complement the approved 193-unit mixed -use development to the south and will create a vibrant street frontage with three-story residential buildings and commercial units directly facing East Avenue. The 4 proposed commercial ready units and the 1,500 square foot commercial space will also complement the 3,246 square feet of commercial/live-work units approved at the Corner of Foothill Boulevard and East Avenue. The proposed architecture creates a contemporary street scene and is enhanced through the use of a variety of materials including horizontal cement board siding, brick veneer, and metal sunshades. The wall plans are well -articulated, and the design elements are carried to all building elevations. The project includes a wide variety of recreational amenities and the open space areas are enhanced by communal seating areas with fire and water features. The only minor outstanding issue is the design of the trash enclosures. It is common practice that the trash enclosures carry over design elements of the main onsite structures. The applicant is concerned that adding cement board horizontal siding or brick veneer to the exterior of the trash enclosures will become a maintenance issue in the future as, from their experience, residents/trash hauler will damage the fagade of the structure. The applicant has provided two design options (Architectural Sheet A21) for the trash enclosures. Option A uses horizontal siding on each wall plane, while Option B uses stucco siding on each wall plane with brick trim along the top of the enclosure walls. The applicant believes that Option B will over the long term be the better choice as it will require less maintenance. Staff believes that Option A is more in keeping with the design of the onsite structures. Staff is open to a compromise that would eliminate the horizontal siding adjacent to the access gates to reduce potential damage. Major Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of the Committee discussion regarding this project. None Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues. 1. The final design of the trash enclosures. 089 DRC COMMENTS DR DRC2018-00770 — SC W ESTBURY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP February 4, 2020 Page 5 Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion. The project is subject to the public art requirement per Development Code Chapter 17.124. 2. All ground -mounted equipment and utility boxes, including transformers, back -flow devices, etc., shall be screened by a minimum of two rows of shrubs spaced a minimum of 18 inches on center. This equipment shall be painted dark green. 3. All Double Detector Checks (DDCs) and Fire Department Connections (FDCs) shall be screened on three sides by 4-foot high walls. The walls shall incorporate the design and materials used on the on -site buildings. 4. Decorative paving shall be provided at the main vehicular access point onto the site. 5. All trash enclosures shall be constructed per City standard. The design of the trash enclosures shall incorporate the materials, finish, color, and trim used on the buildings. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Design Review Committee consider the outstanding design issue related to the trash enclosures and forward the project with a recommendation of approval to the Planning Commission for review of the overall project and the related entitlements. 090 CITY Q DESIGN REVEIW COMMITTEE MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER RAINS ROOM 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA A. 7:00 P.M. - CALL TO ORDER Roll Call: Diane Williams _x Tony M. Guglielmo _x Mike Smith x Additional Staff Present: Sean McPherson, Sr. Planner, Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner. B. ADJOURNMENT The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non -controversial. They will be acted upon by the Committee at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed for discussion. B1. Consideration to adopt Regular Meeting Minutes February 4, 2020. C. PUBLIC HEARINGS/PLANNING COMMISSION The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chairman will open the public hearing to receive testimony. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual or less as determined by the Chairman. Please sign in after speaking. C1. DESIGN REVIEW DRC2018-00770 — SC WESTBURY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP - A request for site plan and architectural review of a proposed mixed -use development that includes 131 residential units (with 4 commercial ready units) and 1,500 square feet of commercial space on 11.44 acres of land in the Community Commercial (CC) District, located on the west side of East Avenue and north of Foothill Boulevard — APN: 1100-191- 04. Related records: Development Code Amendment DRC2018-00992, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2018-00994, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20148, Uniform Sign Program DRC2019-00959 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2019-00867. A Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts has been prepared for consideration. Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner, gave a PowerPoint presentation. (Copy of file) Page 1 of 4 091 01 LCITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON�, FEBRUARY 4, 2020 DESIGN REVEIW COMMITTEE MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER RAINS ROOM 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA Questions by the committee included the following: If there would be a vehicle left turn lane into the project. If on -street parking was parallel or perpendicular. If there was a bike lane planned along the west side of East Avenue. If the project provided a tot lot. If there was trail access to Garcia Park, which is adjacent to the project site. Staff informed the Committee that the parking spaces were parallel to the sidewalk, that they would need to investigate the bicycle lane and left -turn lane, that the project did not include a tot lot, but that it was within % mile of two parks, and that there was a planned community trail adjacent to the project site, but that the project would not be required to install these improvements. The applicant gave a brief presentation. Committee asked the following questions to the application: Asked where the front entrances to the units and live -work units were located, where the residents could ride their bikes and what energy -saving methods were planned. Applicant answered that the front entrances to the units were located down common outdoor entranceways from the front of the buildings. The live -work units faced directly East Avenue and that there were bike storage racks in the garages but that they did not control the bike paths of the project's residents. They have not yet determined whether solar panels would be used on the project, but that the project would be required to follow the California Green Building Code and that Energy Star appliance would be used. Commissioner Williams expressed concern over on -street parking and expressed that units should be set back further from the street, that dedicated left lanes should be provided to prevent traffic backups, that bike lanes should be provided and that tot lots should be provided on all multi -family projects. Both Commissioners felt that the applicants should provide an illustrated street scene that includes the adjacent projects to better understand the neighborhood context, including the architectural themes of surrounding buildings. D. ADJOURNMENT Page 2 of 4 092 FEBRUARY 4, 2020 DESIGN REVEIW COMMITTEE MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER RAINS ROOM 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA Motion by Mike Smith, second by Diane Williams to adjourn the meeting; carried 3-0-0. 7:30pm I, Elizabeth Thornhill, Executive Assistant of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on Thursday, January 2, 2020, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. After speaking, please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium. It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under "Public Comments." There is opportunity to speak under this section prior to the end of the agenda. Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners. A copy of any such materials should also be provided to the Secretary to be used for the official public record. If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at (909) 477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. Page 3 of 4 093 FEBRUARY 4, 2020 DESIGN REVEIW COMMITTEE MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER RAINS ROOM 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing. Requests for scheduling agenda items will be at the discretion of the Commission and the Planning Director. AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. These documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., except for legal City holidays. APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of $3,114 for all decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). Please turn off all cell phones while the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas, staff reports and minutes can be found at www.CityofRC.us. Page 4 of 4 094 PROPOSED FINAL INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Exhibit D WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA LSA June 2020 095 This page intentionally left blank 096 PROPOSED FINAL INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA Submitted to: City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Prepared by: LSA 20 Executive Park, Suite 200 Irvine, California 92614 (949) 553-0666 Project No. STR1901 LSA June 2020 097 This page intentionally left blank 098 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS FIGURES AND TABLES LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS............................................................................................. v 1.0 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1 Contact Person..................................................................................................................1-1 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION..................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Regional Setting................................................................................................................2-1 2.2 Surrounding Land Uses.....................................................................................................2-1 2.3 Existing Site Conditions and Land Use Designations.........................................................2-1 2.4 Project Site History..........................................................................................................2-13 2.5 Existing General Plan and Zoning....................................................................................2-13 2.6 Proposed Project.............................................................................................................2-13 2.7 Discretionary Actions......................................................................................................2-35 2.8 Other Ministerial City Actions.........................................................................................2-35 2.9 Probable Future Actions by Responsible Agencies.........................................................2-35 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED ........................................ 3-1 4.0 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS ................................................... 4-1 4.1 Aesthetics..........................................................................................................................4-1 4.2 Agriculture and Forestry Resources................................................................................4-12 4.3 Air Quality.......................................................................................................................4-15 4.4 Biological Resources........................................................................................................4-24 4.5 Cultural Resources..........................................................................................................4-34 4.6 Energy..............................................................................................................................4-38 4.7 Geology and Soils............................................................................................................4-42 4.8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions.............................................................................................4-51 4.9 Hazards and Hazardous Materials...................................................................................4-56 4.10 Hydrology and Water Quality.........................................................................................4-64 4.11 Land Use and Planning....................................................................................................4-75 4.12 Mineral Resources...........................................................................................................4-80 4.13 Noise................................................................................................................................4-82 4.14 Population and Housing..................................................................................................4-94 4.15 Public Services.................................................................................................................4-96 4.16 Recreation.....................................................................................................................4-105 4.17 Transportation..............................................................................................................4-108 4.18 Tribal Cultural Resources..............................................................................................4-119 4.19 Utilities and Service Systems.........................................................................................4-123 4.20 Wildfire..........................................................................................................................4-130 4.21 Mandatory Findings of Significance..............................................................................4-135 PASTR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20)> i 099 Le WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT JRANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAL FORNIA INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION JUNE 2020 5.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM..................................5-1 5.1 Mitigation Monitoring Requirements............................................................................... 5-1 5.2 Mitigation Monitoring Procedures................................................................................... 5-1 6.0 LIST OF PREPARERS...........................................................................................6-1 6.1 City of Rancho Cucamonga............................................................................................... 6-1 6.2 LSA Associates, Inc............................................................................................................ 6-1 7.0 REFERENCES..................................................................................................... 7-1 APPENDICES A: AIR QUALITY AND GREENHOUSE GAS REPORT B: BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT C: ARBORIST REPORT D: CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT E: PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT F: GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION G: PHASE 1 ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT H: PRELIMINARY WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN I: NOISE IMPACT ANALYSIS J: WESTBURY TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY K: WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE WITH PUBLIC SERVICE PROVIDERS L: TRIBAL CONSULTATION CORRESPONDENCE I P:\STR1901 - Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <<06/18/20» 100 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION DUNE 2020 FIGURES AND TABLES FIGURES Figure 2.1: Project Location .......................................... Figure 2.2: Surrounding Land Uses ............................... Figure 2.3a: Existing Conditions ................................... Figure 2.3b: Existing Conditions ................................... Figure 2.4: Easements .................................................. Figure 2.5: Conceptual Site Plan ................................... Figure 2.6: Elevations ................................................... Figure 2.7: Conceptual Landscape Plan ........................ Figure 2.8: Utility Plan .................................................. Figure 2.9: WQMP Site Map ......................................... Figure 4.1.1: Conceptual Photometric Plan .................. Figure 4.13.1: Noise Monitoring Locations .................. TABLES W ESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J .................................................................... 2-3 .................................................................... 2-5 .................................................................... 2-7 .................................................................... 2-9 .................................................................. 2-11 .................................................................. 2-15 .................................................................. 2-19 .................................................................. 2-25 .................................................................. 2-29 .................................................................. 2-33 .................................................................... 4-9 .................................................................. 4-86 Table 2.A: Proposed Floor Plan Details.............................................................................................2-14 Table2.13: Parking..............................................................................................................................2-23 Table 2.C: Probable Future Actions by Responsible Agencies...........................................................2-35 Table 4.3.A: Short -Term Regional Construction Emissions...............................................................4-18 Table 4.3.13: Opening Year Regional Operational Emissions.............................................................4-20 Table 4.3.C: Construction Localized Impacts Analysis.......................................................................4-21 Table 4.3.D: Long -Term Operational Localized Impacts Analysis......................................................4-21 Table 4.6.A: Estimated Annual Energy Use of the Proposed Project................................................4-39 Table 4.8.A: Operational Greenhouse Gas Emissions.......................................................................4-54 Table 4.11.A: General Plan Consistency Analysis..............................................................................4-77 Table 4.13.A: Significance Criteria Summary.....................................................................................4-84 Table 4.13.13: 24-Hour Ambient Noise Level Measurements............................................................4-88 Table 4.14.A: Etiwanda School District Capacities and Enrollment................................................4-100 Table 4.14.B: Etiwanda School District Projected Enrollment........................................................4-101 Table 4.14.C: CJUHSD School Capacities and Enrollment...............................................................4-101 Table 4.14.D: CJUHSD Projected School Enrollment.......................................................................4-101 Table 4.16.A: Parks and Recreational Facilities in the Project Vicinity...........................................4-106 Table 4.17.A: Intersection LOS Descriptions...................................................................................4-109 Table 4.17.13: Intersection LOS Criteria............................................................................................4-109 Table 4.17.C: Project Trip Generation Summary.............................................................................4-110 Table 4.17.D: Existing Plus Project Intersection LOS Summary.......................................................4-111 Table 4.17.E: Opening Year (2022) Plus Project Intersection LOS Summary..................................4-112 Table 4.17.F: Cumulative Year (2040) Plus Project Intersection LOS Summary..............................4-112 Table 4.17.G: Project Effect on Vehicle Miles Traveled..................................................................4-116 PASTR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20,> I I 101 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 Table 4.19.A: Water Supply and Demand Projections Comparison —Multiple Dry Year Third - Year Supply(2020-2035)....................................................................................................... 4-124 Table 5.A: Mitigation and Monitoring Reporting Program................................................................. 5-2 IV PASTR1901 - Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <<06/18/20» 102 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION DUNE 2020 W ESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS AAQS ambient air quality standards AB Assembly Bill ac acre(s) AIA Airport Influence Area ALS Advanced Life Support APN Assessor's Parcel Number AQMP Air Quality Management Plan Basin South Coast Air Basin bgs below ground surface BMP Best Management Practice Burrtec Burrtec Waste Industries, Inc. CalEEMod California Emission Estimator Model CAL FIRE California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection California Register California Register of Historical Resources CalRecycle California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery Caltrans California Department of Transportation CARB California Air Resources Board CARI California Aquatic Resources Inventory CBC California Building Code CCR California Code of Regulations CDFW California Department of Fish and Wildlife CDMG California Division of Mines and Geology CEC California Energy Commission CEQA California Environmental Quality Act CH4 methane City City of Rancho Cucamonga CJUHSD Chaffey Joint Union High School District CNEL Community Noise Equivalent Level CO carbon monoxide PASTR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20)> v 103 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION JUNE 2020 CO2e carbon dioxide equivalent County County of San Bernardino CREC Controlled Recognized Environmental Concerns CVWD Cucamonga Valley Water District dB decibel(s) dBA A -weighted decibels) DSF Delhi sands flower -loving fly du/ac dwelling units per acre EIR Environmental Impact Report EMS Emergency Medical Services EPA United States Environmental Protection Agency EOP Emergency Operations Plan ESA Environmental Site Assessment ESD Etiwanda School District FAR floor -to -area ratio FBOD Foothill Boulevard Overlay District FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency FHSZ Fire Hazard Severity Zones FHWA Federal Highway Administration FIRM Flood Insurance Rate Map ft foot/feet FTA Federal Transit Administration GHG greenhouse gas gpd gallons per day GSA Groundwater Sustainability Agency GWh gigawatt-hours HCOC hydrologic condition of concern HCP Habitat Conservation Plan HFC hydrofluorocarbons HREC Historical Recognized Environmental Concerns I Interstate vl PASTR1901 - Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <<06/18/20» 104 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION DUNE 2020 W ESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J IEUA Inland Empire Utilities Agency in/sec inch(es) per second IS Initial Study KWh kilowatt-hours LACM Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County Ldn day -night average noise level Leq equivalent continuous sound level LHMP Local Hazard Mitigation Plan LID Low -Impact Development LST localized significance thresholds m meter(s) MBTA Migratory Bird Treaty Act mgd million gallons per day mi mile(s) MLD Most Likely Descendant MND Mitigated Negative Declaration Mpg miles per gallon mph miles per hour MRF Materials Recovery Facility (Burrtec) MRZ Mineral Resource Zone MS4 Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System MT CO2e metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent N20 nitrous oxide NAHC Native American Heritage Commission National Register National Register of Historic Places NCCP Natural Community Conservation Plan NOI Notice of Intent NOx nitrogen oxides NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System 03 ozone OPR Governor's Office of Planning and Res PASTR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20)> vl 105 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION JUNE 2020 PFC perfluorocarbons PM2.6 particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in diameter PM10 particulate matter less than 10 microns in diameter PPV peak particle velocity PRC Public Resources Code PRD Permit Registration Documents PRIMP Paleontological Resources Impact Mitigation Program proposed Project Westbury Residential Project PWQMP Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan RCCSD Rancho Cucamonga Community Services Department RCFPD Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District RCM Regulatory Compliance Measure REC Recognized Environmental Concerns RHNA Regional Housing Needs Assessment RMS root -mean -square RTP Regional Transportation Plan RWQCB Regional Water Quality Control Board SANBAG San Bernardino Associated Governments SB Senate Bill SBSD San Bernardino Sheriff's Department SCAG Southern California Association of Governments SCAQMD South Coast Air Quality Management District SCCIC South Central Coastal Information Center SCS Sustainable Communities Strategy sf square foot/feet SF6 sulfur hexafluoride SIGMA Sustainable Groundwater Management Act SLF Sacred Lands File SMARA Surface Mining and Reclamation Act SMART Stormwater Multiple Application and Report Tracking System sox sulfur oxides vl I I PASTR1901 - Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <<06/18/20» 106 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION DUNE 2020 SPT standard penetration test SR State Route STC Sound Transmission Class SWPPP Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan SWRCB State Water Resources Control Board TAC toxic air contaminant tpd tons per day USFWS United States Fish and Wildlife Service UWMP Urban Water Management Plan VdB vibration velocity decibel(s) VEC vapor encroachment condition VES Vapor Encroachment Screen VHFHSZ Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone VMT vehicle miles traveled VOC volatile organic compounds WDID Waste Discharge Identification Number WDRs Waste Discharge Requirements WQMP Water Quality Management Plan W ESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J PASTR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20)> ix 107 Le A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA JUNE 2020 This page intentionally left blank P:\STR1901 - West bury\IInitial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx «06/18/20» 108 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION DUNE 2020 1.0 INTRODUCTION W ESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the State CEQA Guidelines, this Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) has been prepared for the proposed Westbury Residential Project (Project) near the intersection of West Foothill Boulevard and East Avenue in Rancho Cucamonga, California. Consistent with State CEQA Guidelines Section 15071, this IS/MND includes a description of the proposed Project, an evaluation of the potential environmental impacts, and findings from the environmental analysis. This IS/MND evaluates the potential environmental impacts that may result from development of the proposed Project. The City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) is the Lead Agency under CEQA and is responsible for adoption of the IS/MND and approval of the Project. 1.1 CONTACT PERSON Any questions or comments regarding the preparation of this IS/MND, its assumptions, or its conclusions should be referred to: Tabe van der Zwaag Associate Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Tel: (909) 774-4316 Email: tabe.vanderzwaag@cityofrc.us PASTR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20)> 1.1 109 Le A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA JUNE 2020 This page intentionally left blank 1.2 P:\STR1901 - West bury\IInitial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx «06/18/20» 110 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2.1 REGIONAL SETTING The Project site is in Rancho Cucamonga, California. As shown on Figure 2.1, regional access to the Project site is provided by East Avenue (to the east of the Project site) and West Foothill Boulevard (to the south of the Project site). Interstate (1) 15 is approximately 1 mile (mi) west of the Project site. East Avenue is the eastern boundary of Rancho Cucamonga and Fontana to the east. 2.2 SURROUNDING LAND USES Figure 2.2 illustrates surrounding land uses. To the north, across multiple utility easements, lies Garcia Park and single-family residential development within the Low Medium (LM) District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan (SP-E). The Etiwanda Specific Plan (SP-E) covers 3,000 acres (ac) and was adopted by the City in 1983 to preserve the heritage of a historic community and to ensure the continued rural character of this portion of the city.' To the south is vacant land that is approved for a 193-unit, mixed -use development within the Mixed Use (MU) District. A cellular tower and a building pad associated with a Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD) pumping station are also south of the Project site. To the east, across East Avenue, lies single-family development within Fontana. To the west are multiple utility easements with a City park, Garcia Park, beyond. A CVWD pumping station is along the southern property line. The Project site is within walking distance (less than 0.25 mi) from an Omnitrans bus stop, which serves Route 66 along Foothill Boulevard. The Project site is also along the future Omnitrans West Valley Connector Bus Rapid Transit Route, which is anticipated to provide express bus service with limited stops between Pomona and Fontana. 2.3 EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS AND LAND USE DESIGNATIONS The 11.44 ac Project site (Assessor's Parcel Number [APN] No. 1053-091-010-000) is zoned Community Commercial (CC) and is within the Foothill Boulevard Overlay District (FBOD). The existing General Plan land use designation is Mixed Use (0.25-1.0 floor -to -area ratio [FAR]).2 The Project site is currently vacant and undeveloped. Figures 2.3a and 2.3b include photographs that show the existing conditions on the Project site. The Project site is adjacent to several utility easements on the west side, which limit the developable area on the site. As shown on Figure 2.4, the 11.44 ac Project site consists of 5.74 ac of developable land that is unencumbered by easements and 5.7 ac encumbered by Southern California Gas Company and Southern California Edison easements. Of the 5.74 ac developable portion of the site, 1.84 ac would be parking and roadway uses on an existing easement. City of Rancho Cucamonga. 2010a. General Plan, Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources. City of Rancho Cucamonga. 2016. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00887. PASTR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20)> 2-1 111 Le A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA JUNE 2020 This page intentionally left blank 2.2 P:\STR1901 - West bury\IInitial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx «06/18/20» 112 ids,714*t4 4 d �I I � i ■. i..i t��ii.iil ii� 1 +1S11M 11 ..it.iS��.��14 ,F�S.a.r I V -' �i-•,-� � ram. � _ k.. '1 1 t YJQ tvim AM :.. _ �. .. _ _ 7 ... �. ,,. LSA N 0 250 500 FEET SOURCE: Bing Aerial (2019) imm\ ! _ -,wa LEGEND Project Limits Project Area of Development FIGURE 2.1 Westbury Residential Project Project Location I:\STR1901\G\Project_Location.cdr (6/7/2019) Le A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA JUNE 2020 This page intentionally left blank 2.4 P:\STR1901 - West bury\IInitial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx «06/18/20» 114 L LEGEND FIGURE 2.2 Project Area Existing Land Use (SCAG) 0 Multi -Family Residential OProject Area of Development Commercial and Services Single -Family Residential 1V Omnitrans Bus Stop General Office 0 Open Space and Recreation - Public Facilities Undevelopable or Protected Land o aoo goo - Education 0 Utility Easement Westbury Residential Project FEET Mixed Residential and Commercial Vacant Surrounding Land Uses SOURCE: Google Maps (2018); SCAG (2012) I:\STR1901\GIS\MXD\SurroundingLandUses_SCAG.mxd (6/21/2019) 115 Le A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA JUNE 2020 This page intentionally left blank 2.6 P:\STR1901 - West bury\IInitial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx «06/18/20» 116 1: View of Tasmanian blue gum # 3162 (nearly 100 ft. tall with 60 in. DBH) located near southwest corner of site recommended for preservation. LSA I:\STR1901\G\Existing Conditionsxdr (6/5/2019) 2: View of degraded eucalyptus windrow along East Avenue. 3: View of silver dollar gum # 3188 (35 ft. tall with 20 in. DBH) located near East Avenue. FIGURE 2.3a Westbury Residential Project Existing Conditions 117 Le A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA JUNE 2020 This page intentionally left blank 2.8 P:\STR1901 - West bury\IInitial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx «06/18/20» 118 4: View of degraded eucalyptus windrow (#3166 — #3170) in central portion of site. LSA I:\STR1901\G\Existing Conditionsxdr (6/5/2019) 5: View of silver dollar gum # 3187 in poor conditions located near East Avenue. FIGURE 2.3b Westbury Residential Project Existing Conditions 119 Le A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA JUNE 2020 This page intentionally left blank 2.10 P:\STR1901 - West bury\IInitial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx «06/18/20» 120 1ITO �• i -f 41 now1i , si•- �` rf Yj �I 1 W� lei tw AW -- .., _—•.fir.. - �, ��. � dam � ��, w `' r ,•� I �' I •.� rim. I- • f•� ., I s Project Vicinity ! ' 7._Nr:• Los Bern , • • • .ar • •. Angeles1l County �# of County f • Project Aw- r �.!•� �� - __ ... : . . Location;h r� �' •` ," �:�• I 49 IL J Riverside r}rrWtT .� • _ t County 4•• i. T►; �.it M L,6_0 I III i �, a I - agew L SA LEGEND FIGURE 2.4 Project Site: 11.44ac QDevelopable Land: 5.74 ac N Utility Easements: 5.7 ac 0 150 300 Westbury Residential Project FEET SOURCE: Esri (2017) Existing Easements I:\STR1901\G\Existing Easementsxdr (4/3/2020) 121 Le A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA JUNE 2020 This page intentionally left blank 2-12 P:\STR1901 - West bury\IInitial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx «06/18/20» 122 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J 2.4 PROJECT SITE HISTORY The Project site is vacant land and has not been previously developed. Adjacent areas were previously occupied by orchards, vineyards, a farmhouse, residential properties, and overhead power lines. 2.5 EXISTING GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING The Project site is currently designated as Mixed Use (MU) (0.25-1.0 FAR) on the City's General Plan Land Use Map.3 The Mixed Use land use designation is intended to allow for more intensely developed districts that combine complementary commercial, office, residential, and community uses in areas with access to transit. The Project site is currently zoned Community Commercial (CC) and is within the FBOD. The Community Commercial (CC) zoning classification is intended to allow for commercial activities and services on a larger scale. Although the site is classified as Community Commercial (CC), the FBOD is the zoning district governing development on the site. It should also be noted that the Low Medium (LM) District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan (SP-E) borders the western edge of the Project site. The Etiwanda Specific Plan (SP-E) covers 3,000 ac and was adopted by the City in 1983 to preserve the heritage of a historic community and to ensure the continued rural character of this portion of Rancho Cucamonga.' 2.6 PROPOSED PROJECT 2.6.1 Proposed General Plan and Zoning As previously stated, the existing land use designation in the General Plan is Mixed Use (MU). The existing zoning classification is Community Commercial (CC); however, the Project site is also located within the FBOD. Both the existing General Plan land use designation and zoning classification allow for the operation of commercial uses on the property. The proposed Project consists of a mixed -use development, which would require a Development Code Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment to change the zoning classification figures from Community Commercial (CC) to Mixed Use (MU) District. The Mixed Use (MU) District would allow for a mix of residential and nonresidential uses on the property. Table 17.26.020-1 in the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code also specifies site development regulations for the Mixed Use (MU) District that are intended to ensure that new mixed -use developments are compatible with nearby lower -density residential developments, as well as internal compatibility among the varying uses. j The City's General Plan Land Use Designation of the Project site changed subsequent to the adoption of the 2010 Land Use Plan Map. Refer to General Plan Amendment DRC2015-0087. ' City of Rancho Cucamonga. 2010a. General Plan, Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources. PASTR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20)> 2-13 123 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 2.6.2 Development Proposal As shown on Figure 2.5, the proposed Project involves the development of a two- and three-story mixed -use development of 131 for -rent residential units (73 one -bedroom and 58 two -bedroom units), 4 commercial -ready units (305 square feet [sf] each) that are attached to one -bedroom residential units, and a 1,592 sf commercial space. The commercial -ready units would be attached to 4 of the 73 one -bedroom units. Units are designed to be used either as commercial space or as a second bedroom for the attached residential unit. The 1,592 sf commercial space is intended to be the leasing office and would be located within the single -story leasing office/recreation building. The three-story residential buildings, along with the commercial units, would front East Avenue. The three-story residential building would also form a triangle around a common courtyard at the center of the Project site. Two-story carriage units would be located adjacent to the southern property line and the utility easement that runs along the northwest property line. All units would be single -floor flats accessed by exterior staircases or ground -level walkways. The recreation/leasing office, commercial space, and a pool and a spa would be located at the northeast corner of the site. Two gated vehicle access driveways would be provided along East Avenue, with nongated guest/ customer parking provided adjacent to the leasing office and commercial space. The Project proposes seven total floor plan options that would result in 73 one -bedroom units and 58 two -bedroom units. The units would range in size from 675 to 830 sf for the one -bedroom units and 722 to 1,137 sf for the two -bedroom units. Table 2.A shows the number of units proposed for each floor plan. Table 2.A: Proposed Floor Plan Details Building Dest. Type Qty. One -Bedroom Two -Bedroom Total Units Garage Al A2 A3 A4 B1 B2 B3 1 1 1 6 6 0 0 7 3 0 22 14 2 II 1 6 6 0 0 2 6 0 20 11 3 II 1 6 6 0 0 2 6 0 20 11 4 II 1 6 6 0 0 2 6 0 20 11 5A III 1 11 0 0 0 6 0 0 17 13 56 III 1 3 0 0 3 11 0 0 17 14 6 IV 7 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 14 56 7 V 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 4 Subtotal — — 38 24 8 3 30 21 7 — — Totals — 14 73 58 131 134 % — — 55.7% 44.3% 100% 2-14 PASTR1901 - Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <<06/18/20» 124 _ COMMERCIAL AREA 1,592 SQFT. _COMMERCIAL READY 305 SQFT./ UNIT TOTAL: 305 SQFT. X 4 UNITS = 1,220 SQFT. L SA 0 55 110 FEET SOURCE: Architects Orange FIGURE 2.5 Westbury Residential Project Conceptual Site Plan I:\STR1901\G\Site Plan.cdr (6/5/2019) 125 Le A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA JUNE 2020 This page intentionally left blank 2-16 P:\STR1901 - West bury\IInitial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx «06/18/20» 126 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J Following implementation of the Project, the total building density on the site would be 22.8 dwelling units per acre (du/ac),' which would be below the maximum permitted density of 50 du/ac allowed in the Mixed Use (MU) District. The proposed Project also includes 1.09 ac of common and private open space, which would equate to 364 sf of open space per unit. Recreational amenities would include a pool and a spa, barbeque facilities, a clubhouse, common open space areas, and multiple -court sport areas (e.g., volleyball, cornhole, badminton, bocce ball, and horseshoe). A total of 39,467 sf of common usable open space would be provided as part of the Project. 2.6.3 Building and Site Design Building Design As illustrated by Figure 2.6, Elevations, the proposed buildings would be developed in a California Contemporary architectural design. The California Contemporary design is a sophisticated style that features the juxtaposition of positive and negative space accentuated by thoughtful material application. The architectural elements would be designed to provide an animated fagade that would incorporate both vertical and horizontal relief while focusing on residential scale and proportion. Two complementary color palettes would be used to differentiate the architectural elements while maintaining a harmonious balance in the community. The colors emphasize the hierarchy and interplay of the building masses and planes. Building masses would be accented with horizontal lap siding accents in contrasting colors. Stone veneer would be used to emphasize pedestrian entries. Sun control devices would be placed to respond to the solar orientation of the architecture. Of the on -site residential buildings, two along East Avenue would include live -work units. These buildings would be further enhanced to feature corner windows, additional stone, metal accent panels, and signage. All on -site proposed buildings would be a maximum of three stories in height with a maximum height of 41.5 feet (ft). S The density calculation was based on the 3.76 ac area of the Project site unencumbered by easements and the 2.03 ac Southern California Gas Company easement to be used to fulfill the Project's parking requirement. PASTR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20)> 2-17 127 Le A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA JUNE 2020 This page intentionally left blank 2.18 P:\STR1901 - West bury\IInitial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx «06/18/20» 128 t ■ ]mi J .�o � II ,,,,,, �� IIII=ippl ollo-�l;, ® iill�ll � IIIIIII II iillllll' ■ - FFF _ __.IIIIII I��II �IIIII�'.-III - I I ]IIIII ❑ ❑ �IIIIIII II i_IIIIIII�' �_ 11' 1 ■■ ■ �� n u ❑ �� . LJ ❑ ❑ ' ■ nJll tlllllll IIillllll �� L � r � a MONIIII alll - ■■ ■■ �� s■ o �� ■■ ■■ - NMI.. �� IIII=+I+IIII IIII-IIII IIIUllll r MIS MEN WIN AIIM III=(IIIII Illlllh='IIIII i1-1�1 �I a _ � _ — IN �:�� IIII QII t ■'�� I� I ,, ,, �-�; .■■ (IIIII ps F1 _ I Nil❑FIE ■ ❑ I ❑ ❑ ®IIII LJ MEN MENNEN AID l luaal II ItlLllll Illrlllll IIII=111� Illrllll I I I mom 0.2 IIU_plll IIII_allll IIlo111f IIII-IIII = 1mLE =on�f11 on '1 Le A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA JUNE 2020 This page intentionally left blank 2.20 P:\STR1901 - West bury\IInitial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx «06/18/20» 130 oil,ISM ' \ �: I_ -tl II! TIIIIIIP Il inl .Inn IIImI Pig � -�, _ L. lam ■ � �' °i . Illllp��llllll �IIIII� � III_ii!ii In_„ . 1111=alll � IIIOIII Illlnllll Illllf; I Illlu IIIIII -- o ■■ -� r- ■■ i-- IIN-11111 ■ IIIUJIIII IIU�alll � IIU�-1111 ni-� e■ n■ Ilhullll -- _ � ■■■■ IIII� Im '�- o a nil M I i IN -- -- -- -- -- -{ "Ifi IIII� IIII 11115111 ■ IIIII�IIII ME F IIII_illl 6 - ■- -- -- -- -- -- III IIIIII � III,U-qll Illlallll -- -- -- 1111=illll IIIIII IIIroIIII IIIIII , IIIb-1111 IIIUpll IIIIII IIII_pl III ■ ■ III v III ■ III III III ❑ _ III III o —� �. !! a ■■ ■er II i e L G Hi _ m Le A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA JUNE 2020 This page intentionally left blank 2-22 P:\STR1901 - West bury\IInitial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx «06/18/20» 132 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J Parking Based on the City's parking requirements (Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 17.64.050), the proposed Project would be required to provide 1.5 spaces per one -bedroom unit, 2 spaces per two -bedroom unit, 1 visitor space for every three units, and 4 spaces for every 1,000 sf of commercial space. The minimum required amount of parking for the proposed Project would be 282 spaces, 131 of which are required to be provided in the form of a garage or carport. Required parking includes tenant and guest parking for the residential portion of the development, as well as parking for the commercial and commercial -ready units. The 1,592 sf of commercial space and the commercial -ready units were parked at the office/retail parking rate (1/250 gross square foot). The Project is required to provide 1 garage/carport parking space for each one- and two -bedroom unit, or 131 spaces based on the proposed unit breakdown. As shown in Table 2.13, the proposed Project would provide 134 garage parking spaces and 148 open parking spaces. Of those, 147 of the required parking spaces would be on a Southern California Gas Company easement, for which the Applicant has received an initial acceptance letter to allow parking on the easement. The Project also proposes to permit street parking on the west side of East Avenue, similar to the approved mixed -use project to the south. This would net up to 18 additional parking spaces adjacent to the commercial and commercial -ready tenant spaces. These parking spaces are not counted in the total parking count for the proposed Project, as they are not on the Project site. Table 2.113: Parking Number of Units Square Footage Parking Ratio Required Parking Multifamily Units (one bedroom) 72 N/A 1.5 per unit, 1 in garage or carport 108 Multifamily Units (two bedrooms) 59 N/A 2 per unit, 1 in garage or carport 118 Visitor Parking (multifamily) 131 N/A 1 per 3 units 44 Commercial/Office N/A 1,592 1 per 250 square feet 7 Commercial -Ready I N/A 1 1,220 1 1 per 250 square feet 5 Total Parking Spaces Required 282 Proposed Parking Total Garage Parking Spaces Provided/Required 134/131 Total Open Parking Spaces 148 Total Commercial Stalls 5 Total Parking Spaces Provided 287 N/A = not applicable In addition, the City requires that bicycle parking be provided at a rate of 5 percent of the total required parking. Landscaping and Fencing There are 33 trees on the Project site in the existing condition. Of the total 33 existing trees on the property, 30 are Tasmanian bluegum trees that are on the southern portion of the site parallel to East Avenue. The remaining three trees are silver dollar gum trees and are located along the PASTR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20)> 2-23 133 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 northeastern boundary of the site parallel to East Avenue. All 33 of the existing trees would be removed as part of Project implementation. As shown on Figure 2.7, Conceptual Landscape Plan, the proposed Project would include 10 ft landscaped setbacks along East Avenue and around the perimeter of the community. Landscaping visible from East Avenue would include various trees and shrubbery, such as date palms, crepe myrtles, fruitless olive trees, and ground cover. Additional trees would be planted along on -site pathways, around the open space area, and around the pool area. Perimeter landscaping to the north (adjacent to the parking area) would include ground cover and small shrubs. As required by the City, East Avenue would be fully improved, including a new asphalt section, curb and gutter improvements, landscaping improvements (such as street trees), two new drive approaches, and a wrought -iron fence and/or property boundary wall. Within the community, there would be several landscaped areas for seating, recreation, and leisure. These areas would be maintained by the property owner and would consist of raised planters, large trees, an open turf area, and central open space. In total, 68,230 sf of landscaping would be installed as part of the Project, including the 102 trees that would be planted on site. Landscaping would be irrigated with an electrically operated irrigation system using weather sensors and low -volume irrigation. The system would be designed based on plants' water use and would apply water efficiently. The system would be designed in accordance with the definitions of the City's Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, Section 17.138.020). A tubular steel fence would be constructed along the southern and eastern boundaries of the site, and between the parking and residential areas along the northern boundary. This fence would include numerous pedestrian gates to provide access from various points in the parking area and along East Avenue. Vehicular and Pedestrian Access Two gated entries off East Avenue would provide vehicular access to the Project site. The primary entry would be located along East Avenue; this entrance would provide access to the internal vehicular roadway, residential units, and leasing office. A northern gate along East Avenue would provide direct access to the surface parking area. Vehicles traveling north and south along East Avenue could access both gates. The northernmost vehicular access gate would align with the existing Marshall Court/East Avenue intersection. The primary entryway would be demarcated by an entry monument and pavers. 2-24 PASTR1901 - Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <<06/18/20» 134 LSA FEET SOURCE: KDLA, inc. I:\STR1901\G\Landscape Plan.cdr (6/6/2019) FIGURE 2.7 Westbury Residential Project Conceptual Landscape Plan 135 Le A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA JUNE 2020 This page intentionally left blank 2-26 P:\STR1901 - West bury\IInitial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx «06/18/20» 136 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J The gates would be electronically controlled and would be designed to meet the City's standard gate entry requirements. Residents would have remote controls to open the gate. The southernmost gate would provide visitor access to the community. A callbox would ring to residents' phones to provide guest access. A code -protected pedestrian gate adjacent to the vehicular gate would also be included for residents and guests. Emergency vehicles would be able to enter and exit the Project site via the gated -access driveways off Eastern Avenue with an emergency override key switch. In addition, a remote gate -opening device would be installed. The Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District requires an optical gate opening system with a redundant Knox switchTM. Optical systems work the same as the traffic signal preemption system by using the emergency vehicle's strobe light to open the gate. Pedestrian access to the Project site from the sidewalk on East Avenue would be provided by four entrance gates. Pedestrian access to/from the parking area would be provided by five access gates. In addition, there would be one designated pedestrian access gate to provide pedestrian access to/from the parking area and the commercial area. Circulation Circulation throughout the community would take place via a private access drive that would provide direct access to each residential unit's garage, as well as uncovered resident and visitor parking. The private access drive would be accessed by vehicles from the main entry from East Avenue or from an internal connection to the open parking area on the northern portion of the Project site. The proposed Project would include rolled curbs to eliminate the need for driveway cuts. Public Transportation Omnitrans, the public transportation agency in San Bernardino County, operates four bus lines in the vicinity of the Project site: Route 66, which travels east -west along Foothill Boulevard; Route 67, which travels east -west along Baseline Road; Route 82, which travels north -south along Milliken Avenue and along Foothill Boulevard toward Victoria Gardens; and Route 85, which travels north - south along Milliken Avenue above Foothill Boulevard. The nearest railway stations are the Rancho Cucamonga and Fontana Metrolink stations; the Project site is 3.8 mi and 5.4 mi away from these stations, respectively. The Project area is served by the San Bernardino, Riverside and Inland Empire -Orange County Metrolink lines. The San Bernardino Line directly services the Rancho Cucamonga and Fontana stations and proves access to Los Angeles Union Station, which connects with other Metrolink lines and provides access to the greater Southern California region. Lighting The proposed Project would include on -site lighting consisting of 105-watt parking lot pole lighting (15 ft in height), 65-watt decorative pole lighting (15 ft in height), and 12-watt decorative wall lighting. All lighting would be hooded or shielded to focus the light downward and prevent light spillage onto adjacent properties. PASTR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20)> 2-27 137 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 Signage The proposed Project would include a community identification monument sign with a maximum height of 5 ft at the Project entry, as well as address signage on the residential units. The commercial area at the northern boundary of the Project site would feature one tenant wall sign. The commercial -ready units along East Avenue would feature tenant identification vertical blade signs and projecting blade signs. All signs within the Project site would be designed and installed according to the Uniform Sign Program for the Project, in compliance with City signage standards. During construction, temporary signage would designate construction and model home traffic routes. Police and Fire Access Fire and police access on the site would be facilitated by a fire lane and the installation of directional signage. As previously discussed, emergency vehicles would be able to enter and exit the Project site via the gated access driveways off East Avenue. The main (southern) gate includes a fire access lane. In addition, all interior roadways have been designed to accommodate the size and turning radius of a fire truck. Per Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, Chapter 15.12.040, Section 903, all units would have automatic sprinkler systems. In addition, the proposed Project includes the installation of seven fire hydrants on site to ensure that 150 ft fire hoses can reach every area. Sustainability Features The proposed Project would be consistent with California's Title 24 energy efficiency code. 2.6.4 Infrastructure Improvements On -Site and Off -Site Infrastructure The proposed Project would include connections to existing off -site infrastructure systems. These systems, which include water, sanitary sewer, and stormwater drains, would be constructed on site and would be fully provided and maintained by the property owner. As shown on Figure 2.8, Utility Plan, all on -site systems, would connect to existing infrastructure on East Avenue. As part of the proposed Project, sewer lines and manholes would be installed at two points in East Avenue. One sewer line and manhole would be located south of the Project's main driveway and the second sewer line and manhole would be located in East Avenue south of the Project boundary. Four water lines would be installed within East Avenue and would travel within the Project's internal circulation system to provide water conveyance throughout the Project site. The proposed on -site storm drain would connect to a proposed storm drain system in East Avenue that would run south and connect to the existing storm drain system in East Avenue. 2-28 PASTR1901 - Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <<06/18/20» 138 / III II I F"RC POSED WATER BEGIN WATER I I :EXISTING STORM DRAIN ISTING I SEWER EMSTING WATER II 3 i I r- I I / II 7POSED WATER BEGIN WATER "SE / D ,mm I II SEWER HOLE _ I II E SEWER 5 — S— I - I 11 L C A LEGEND FIGURE 2.8 V / ` Water Sewer Storm Drain N D 60 120 Westbury Residential Project FEET Utility Plan SOURCE: Architects Orange 1 Zo I:\STR1901\G\Utility_P1an.cdr (8/29/2019) Le A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA JUNE 2020 This page intentionally left blank 2.30 P:\STR1901 - West bury\IInitial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx «06/18/20» 140 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J Water Quality The proposed Project is subject to the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board's (RWQCB) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit and Waste Discharge Requirements for the San Bernardino County Flood Control District, the County of San Bernardino, and the Incorporated Cities of San Bernardino County within the Santa Ana Region (Order No. R8-2010-0036, NPDES No. CAS618036) (San Bernardino County Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System [MS4] permit). A Project -specific Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) must be developed for the Project to meet the requirements of Order No. R8-2010-0036 and implement best management practices (BMPs) to reduce pollutants of concern in stormwater runoff. A Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (PWQMP) (Madole and Associates, Inc., June 2019) (Appendix H) has been prepared for the Project. As outlined in the PWQMP, proposed BMPs for the Project include storm drain stenciling to discourage downstream dumping, the installation of a catch basin filter to remove the majority of trash and debris prior to reaching underground storm drains, a settling chamber to filter pollutants, and an injection well to capture and infiltrate water runoff throughout the Project site. These proposed BMPs would meet the Project's Low -Impact Development (LID) requirements. The PWQMP site map is shown on Figure 2.9, WQMP Site Map. Refer to Section 4.10 for additional information pertaining to hydrology and water quality. 2.6.5 Implementation/Phasing Project construction would generally take place in the following steps: • Phase 1: Site Preparation • Phase 2: Grading • Phase 3: Construction • Phase 4: Paving During Project construction, construction vehicle trips would be generated on a daily basis. Construction trips would be generated by construction workers commuting to and from the Project site and the delivery of construction materials and equipment. The construction phase with the highest trip generation would be Phase 3, Construction. During this phase of Project construction, there would be 139 worker trips and 31 vendor trips. For the purposes of the analysis in this IS/MND, it is assumed that construction workers would arrive and depart during peak hours, whereas delivery trucks would arrive and depart throughout the day. It is estimated that no more than 10 percent (3 trips) of delivery trips would occur during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. Project construction is anticipated to take approximately 18 months. The expected date of completion is June 2022. All construction equipment would be staged on the Project site for the duration of the construction period. In addition, construction workers would park their personal vehicles on the construction site during working hours. PASTR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20)> 2-31 141 Le A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA JUNE 2020 This page intentionally left blank 2-32 P:\STR1901 - West bury\IInitial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx «06/18/20» 142 LEGEND: I I DRAINAGE AREA BOUNDARY O MAXWELL IV INJECTION WELL � I DA DRAINAGE AREA p 'I SF SQUARE FEET CF CUBIC FEET DCV DESIGN CAPTURE VOLUME IMP IMPERVIOUS RATIO Qbmp WATER QUALITY FLOW RATE SO. CAL. GAS EASEMENT l -� i III _ fiuilll'll�/ I �� ► �M° o �� APIA, PRI4 • � � ire/ , �9G��:��i/��91��.��/'��7 �►� �.I„Ili e / XI .36" GAS LINES �'ss +,,as i L SA FIGURE 2.9 N o so 1e0 Westbury Residential Project FEET SOURCE: Madole & Associates, Inc. WQM P Site Map I:\STR1901\G\WQMRcdr (6/20/2019) 143 Le A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA JUNE 2020 This page intentionally left blank 2-34 P:\STR1901 - West bury\IInitial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx «06/18/20» 144 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J 2.7 DISCRETIONARY ACTIONS Development of the proposed Project would require discretionary approvals by the City as the Lead Agency. The City's discretionary actions would include the following: • Zoning Map and Development Code Amendment: The Project site currently has a zoning designation of Community Commercial (CC). The Project proposes to rezone the Project site to Mixed Use (MU). • Tentative Tract Map: A Tentative Tract Map is required to subdivide the property to allow for future conversion of the residential units to condominiums. • Tree Removal Permit: A permit is required to remove the 33 existing trees on the Project site. • Uniform Sign Program: A Uniform Sign Program is required for the residential, commercial, and commercial -ready portions of the Project. 2.8 OTHER MINISTERIAL CITY ACTIONS Ministerial permits/approvals would be issued by the City or other appropriate agencies to allow site preparations, underground infiltration chambers, connections to the utility infrastructure, dwelling units, paving, landscaping, walls and fences, and other Project features subject to ministerial permits. 2.9 PROBABLE FUTURE ACTIONS BY RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES Because the Project also involves approvals, permits, or authorization from other agencies, these agencies are "Responsible Agencies" under CEQA. Section 15381 of the State CEQA Guidelines defines Responsible Agencies as public agencies other than the Lead Agency that will have discretionary approval power over the Project or some component of the Project, including mitigation. These agencies include, but are not limited to, the agencies identified in Table 2.C. Table 2.C: Probable Future Actions by Responsible Agencies Responsible Agency Action Rancho Cucamonga Fire Approval of Fuel Modification Plan and Fire Master Plan Protection District State Water Resources Control Applicant/Developer must submit Permit Registration Documents, including a Board Notice of Intent, to comply with the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System San Bernardino County Permit (Santa Ana Region) (Order No. R8-2010- 0036, NPDES No. CAS618036) (San Bernardino County MS4 permit). P:\STR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20)> 2-35 145 Le A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA JUNE 2020 This page intentionally left blank 2-36 P:\STR1901 - West bury\IInitial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx «06/18/20» 146 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION DUNE 2020 W ESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist in Chapter 3.0. ❑ Aesthetics ® Biological Resources ® Geology/Soils ❑ Hydrology/Water Quality ® Noise ❑ Recreation ❑ Utilities/Service Systems ❑ Agriculture and Forestry Resources ® Cultural Resources ❑ Greenhouse Gas Emissions ❑ Land Use/Planning ❑ Population/Housing ❑ Transportation ❑ Wildfire DETERMINATION. On the basis of this initial evaluation: On the basis of this initial evaluation: ❑ Air Quality ❑ Energy ® Hazards & Hazardous Materials ❑ Mineral Resources ❑ Public Services ® Tribal Cultural Resources ® Mandatory Findings of Significance ❑ I find that the proposed Project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ® I find that although the proposed Project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ❑ I find that the proposed Project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ❑ I find that the proposed Project MAY have a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect (1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and (2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. ❑ I find that although the proposed Project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed Project, nothing further is required. Signature Date PASTR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20)> 3_1 147 Le A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA JUNE 2020 This page intentionally left blank 3.2 P:\STR1901 - West bury\IInitial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx «06/18/20» 148 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J 4.0 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g., the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project -specific factors as well as general standards (e.g., the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project -specific screening analysis). 2. All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off -site as well as on -site, cumulative as well as project -level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3. Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4. "Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from "Earlier Analyses," as described in (5) below, may be cross-referenced). 5. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following: a. Earlier Analysis Used. Identify and state where they are available for review. b. Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c. Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site -specific conditions for the project. 6. Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously PASTR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20)> 4-1 149 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 7. Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 8. This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project's environmental effects in whatever format is selected. 9. The explanation of each issue should identify: a. The significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and b. The mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance. 4.2 PASTR1901 - Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <<06/18/20» 150 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J 4.1 AESTHETICS Less than Potentially Significant with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Except as provided in Public Resources Code Section 21099, would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? ❑ ❑ ® ❑ b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings ❑ ❑ ❑ within a state scenic highway c) In non -urbanized areas, substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? (Public views are those that are experienced ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ from a publicly accessible vantage point.) If the project is in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would ❑ ❑ ® ❑ adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Impact Analysis a) Would the project have a substantial effect on a scenic vista? California State Government Code Section 65560(b)(3) stipulates that city and county General Plans address "...Open space for outdoor recreation, including but not limited to, areas of outstanding scenic, historical and cultural value; areas particularly suited for park and recreation purposes, including access to lakes shores, beaches, and rivers, and streams; and areas which serve as links between major recreation and open space reservations, including utility easements, banks of rivers and streams, trails, and scenic highway corridors." A scenic vista is the view of an area that is visually or aesthetically pleasing from a certain vantage point. It is usually viewed from some distance away. Aesthetic components of a scenic vista include (1) scenic quality, (2) sensitivity level, and (3) view access. A scenic vista can be impacted in two ways: a development project can have visual impacts by either directly diminishing the scenic quality of the vista or by blocking the view corridors or "vista" of the scenic resource. Important factors in determining whether a proposed Project would block scenic vistas include the project's proposed height, mass, and location relative to surrounding land uses and travel corridors. The Project site is located in a developed area of Rancho Cucamonga east of 1-15 and near the intersection of West Foothill Boulevard and East Avenue. The Project site is currently undeveloped and is characterized by an undeveloped dirt lot, ruderal vegetation, and mature trees. Surrounding views comprise a developed suburban environment that is primarily built out with residential and commercial uses. Distant views of the San Gabriel Mountains to the north and northeast are visible from various vantage points throughout Rancho Cucamonga. Within the vicinity of the Project site, views of the San Gabriel Mountains are visible from the Project site and areas immediately south of the Project PASTR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20)> 4-1 151 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 site. Other views in the vicinity include views of single-family housing, Garcia Park, and a flood channel extending from the eastern side of East Avenue to the area immediately south of the East Avenue/Foothill Boulevard intersection. The City's General Plan Resource Conservation Element (2010) provides direction regarding the preservation and enhancement of important views along north -south roadways, along open space corridors, and at other key scenic locations within Rancho Cucamonga. As described in the Resource Conservation Element, north -south roadways in Rancho Cucamonga provide important views of scenic resources. The orientation of roadways in the city provide important views of the San Gabriel Mountains and San Bernardino National Forest. The Project site is adjacent to East Avenue, a north - south roadway. However, according to General Plan Figure LU-6, East Avenue is not a designated View Corridor. Additionally, no designated trails or vantage points currently exist on the Project site. In addition, the City's General Plan Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources Element establishes View Corridors throughout Rancho Cucamonga. There are no designated View Corridors within the vicinity of the Project site. The nearest View Corridor is the portion of Day Creek Boulevard north of Baseline Avenue. Day Creek Boulevard is a north -south roadway 1.5 mi northwest of the Project site that provides north -facing views of the varied natural topography of the mountains. State Route (SR) 210 is an east -west designated View Corridor 1.85 mi north of the Project site that offers similar mountainous views. Construction. Construction of the proposed Project would require site preparation, grading, and construction activities. Construction activities would be visible to travelers along East Avenue and West Foothill Boulevard and to users of Garcia Park. Any partial obstruction of scenic views of the San Gabriel Mountains and San Bernardino National Forest as a result of construction activities would be short-term in nature and would cease upon Project completion. In addition, construction equipment is not of sufficient height or mass to substantially block views of the San Gabriel Mountains and San Bernardino National Forest. Therefore, construction impacts related to adverse effects on a scenic vista would be less than significant, and no mitigation would be required. Operation. As previously stated, the proposed Project would be located in a developed area of Rancho Cucamonga. The Project includes the development of a mixed -use community that would be a maximum of three stories (approximately 42 ft in height), which could result in the partial obstruction of scenic views of the San Gabriel Mountains and San Bernardino National Forest. While the partial obstruction of views of surrounding hills may occur as a result of Project implementation, overall views of surrounding hillsides would not be substantially affected by development of the site due to the prominence of these features. Further, the Project would include landscaping elements throughout the Project site and along the site's perimeter, which would serve to enhance scenic views and would block views of the proposed residential uses from adjacent roadways. The proposed residential development would be similar in height to the surrounding residential developments (e.g., the residences to the northwest), which are two stories in height. While the proposed Project would be taller than adjacent structures and may partially obstruct views of the San Gabriel Mountains and San Bernardino National Forest from the Project site and surrounding area, the overall views of the mountains and associated foothills would not be substantially affected by the Project due to the prominence of the mountains. 4.-2 PASTR1901 - Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <<06/18/20» 152 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J While implementation of the proposed Project would modify views of and from the Project site by allowing for development of a residential community on the site, the Project would not result in significant impacts on visual and aesthetic resources as compared to existing conditions. Therefore, potential impacts of the proposed Project on scenic vistas would be less than significant, and no mitigation would be required. Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. b) Would the Project substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? The California Department of Transportation's (Caltrans) Landscape Architecture Program administers the Scenic Highway Program, contained in the Streets and Highways Code, Sections 260-263. State Highways are classified as either Officially Listed or Eligible. There are no Officially Listed or Eligible State -designated scenic highways in Rancho Cucamonga.6 North -south roadways provide important views of scenic resources in the city.' Therefore, the proposed Project does not have the potential to damage resources within a State -designated scenic highway. The Project site is located within a developed area of Rancho Cucamonga that is primarily characterized by commercial and residential uses. As discussed further in Section 4.4, Biological Resources, existing vegetation on the Project site is ruderal and nonnative. The proposed Project would replace existing ruderal vegetation on the site with ornamental landscaping. In addition, no existing aesthetic or visual resources located on the Project site or in the surrounding vicinity have been designated in the City's General Plan. No existing scenic rock outcroppings are located within the Project limits. While the proposed Project would result in the removal of all 33 existing trees on the site, the Project proposes to replace these trees and landscaping with new trees and vegetation along the internal roadways and the southern and eastern borders of the site. There are no historic buildings on or near the Project site. Therefore, the proposed Project does not have the potential to damage scenic resources, and no mitigation would be required. Significance Determination: No Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). California Scenic Highway Mapping System (San Bernardino County). City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. 2010. Resource Conservation Element. PASTR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20)> 4-3 153 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 c) In non -urbanized areas, would the Project, substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? (Public views are those that are experienced from publicly accessible vantage point). If the project is in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality? The Project site is currently vacant and undeveloped, but it is located in an urbanized area. The area is predominantly characterized by a variety of residential and commercial uses, and major roadways, such West Foothill Boulevard and East Avenue. As discussed in detail below, the proposed Project would not conflict with applicable zoning or General Plan regulations governing scenic quality. Construction. Construction of the proposed Project would involve on -site construction activities that would be visible to travelers along East Avenue and West Foothill Boulevard. Due to the height of the proposed three-story buildings, construction activities would not be fully screened from surrounding land uses. However, construction activities would be temporary in nature and, consequently, would not substantially impact sensitive uses. Therefore, due to the short-term duration of construction activities, impacts during construction would be less than significant, and no mitigation would be required. Operation. As described above, the visual character immediately surrounding the Project site is representative of a fully built -out urban area containing a mix of residential and commercial uses. All structures developed on the Project site would be of contemporary architectural design, consistent with other residential communities in the vicinity, and composed of colors and materials that complement existing surroundings. The form and scale of all structures on site would be visually consistent with neighboring residential developments. The proposed Project would incorporate ornamental landscaping along East Avenue and throughout the proposed residential development to frame and enhance views of the Project site. The proposed Project would be visible to pedestrians and vehicular traffic along East Avenue and to users of Garcia Park. The installation of landscaping and fencing would help to partially screen the residential development from the surrounding areas. Building design and landscaping would serve to enhance the existing visual quality and character of the site as compared to existing conditions. Zoning. The Project site is currently zoned Community Commercial (CC) and is within the FBOD. The Community Commercial (CC) zone allows for larger retail, entertainment, and commercial service business centers, generally as part of a cohesive and coordinated shopping destination of retail and service -oriented businesses that serve the entire community. The Project proposes to develop 131 for -rent residential units, 4 commercial -ready units, and a 1,592 sf commercial space. As such, the Project site would require a Zoning Map and Development Code Amendment to rezone the site from Community Commercial (CC) to Mixed Use (MU). Chapter 17.36.020 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code outlines permitted uses and minimum development standards allowed in the Mixed Use (MU) District. One purpose of these regulations is to ensure compliance with appropriate standards related to aesthetics and scenic quality. The proposed Project would be consistent with the development standards allowed in the Mixed Use (MU) District. The maximum density allowed in this zone is 50 du/ac. The Project proposes a net density of 22.8 du/ac, which is less than the maximum density requirement. Other development 4-4 PASTR1901 - Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <<06/18/20» 154 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J standards for this zone include a 50-75 percent reduction of streetscape requirements for street yard setbacks along major and secondary roadways. The building setback for attached single-family residential and multifamily residential along secondary roadways is 35 ft. The portion of the proposed Project that is aligned with East Avenue (a secondary roadway) would have a setback of 10 ft, which is a 71 percent reduction in the streetscape setback and falls within the allowed reduction range of 50-75 percent for the Mixed Use (MU) District. The Mixed Use (MU) District also allows for a rear -yard setback of 0 ft, which is consistent with the proposed Project design. In the Mixed Use (MU) zone, the primary building height is not to exceed 75 ft, and the accessory building height is not exceed the primary building height. As previously discussed, the proposed Project would be approximately 42 ft in height at its tallest point. Accessory buildings within the proposed community range in height from approximately 20 ft to 41 ft. The minimum required landscape area is 10 percent, and a minimum of 150 sf of open space per unit is required in the Mixed Use (MU) District. The proposed Project would provide 39,467 sf of common usable open space and 8,193 sf of private open space, which would provide 364 sf of open space per unit. Finally, per the Municipal Code, all Mixed Use (MU) District developments must incorporate a minimum of two of the following land uses: commercial, office, institutional, residential, and live/work. The proposed Project would include residential and commercial requirements, thereby satisfying the Mixed Use (MU) District land use requirement. General Plan. According to the City's General Plan Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources Element (2010), the Project site currently has a land use designation of Mixed Use (MU). The proposed Project would be consistent with permitted uses in this designation, which allows for a combination of commercial, office, residential, and community uses. The proposed Project would also be consistent with applicable goals and policies regulating visual character and urban design in Rancho Cucamonga: • Goal LU-9: Foster a cohesive, healthy community through appropriate patterns and scales of development, including complementary transitions between districts, neighborhoods, and land uses. o Policy LU-9.2: Integrate districts and neighborhoods into the overall City structure and image. o Policy LU-9.5: Establish Mixed Use areas as higher intensity "urban centers" where there is sensitive integration of land uses, convenient modes of transportation, and a focused "sense of place" that emanates from the architectural and landscape design. • Goal LU-11: Ensure that community aesthetics are maintained through appropriate regulations. o Policy LU-11.1: Continue to implement and update as necessary the City's Sign Ordinance in order to provide for a reasonable system of review and incentives for well -designed signs throughout the City. • Goal LU-13: Take full advantage of view lines and vista points with carefully designed development. PASTR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20)> 4-5 155 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 o Policy LU-13.1: On north -south roadways, open space corridors, and other locations where there are views of scenic resources, trees, and structures, encourage framing and orientation of such views at key locations, and endeavor to keep obstruction of views to a minimum. The design of the proposed development would be compatible with the aforementioned zoning regulations and General Plan goals and policies, and would also be consistent with the existing style of the surrounding neighborhoods. As part of the Project, landscaping would improve Project site conditions and enhance views of the site from adjacent properties. The construction materials, colors, and vegetation incorporated into the Project's design would complement nearby scenic resources and maintain visual cohesion with hillside development to the north. As discussed above in Response 4.1(a), the proposed Project would not interfere with scenic views of mountains to the north. Additionally, implementation of the proposed Project would not result in a disruption to the existing patterns and scales among surrounding developments and would be visually cohesive with surrounding residential neighborhoods. The maximum height of the proposed Project would be approximately 42 ft and therefore would be consistent with the scale of surrounding residential development. Furthermore, all signs would be approved by the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department and would conform to the Uniform Sign Program. Overall, improvements associated with the proposed Project are anticipated to improve the existing visual character of the Project site and would serve to provide increased visual cohesion between the Project site and the surrounding area. Summary. In summary, the proposed Project would develop the Project site with a mixed -use community that would enhance the visual quality and character of the site. The proposed Project would be consistent with the height, scale, and design of developments within the vicinity of the Project site and, consequently, would not fundamentally alter the surrounding land use character. In addition, following approval of the Zoning Map change and Development Code Amendment, the zoning classification and land use designation associated with the Project site would be consistent with the proposed use. The proposed Project would also be consistent with all development regulations and General Plan goals and policies pertaining to the visual character of the proposed mixed -use development. For the reasons stated above, the proposed Project would not degrade the visual character of the planning area or conflict with applicable zoning and General Plan regulations governing scenic quality, and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect daytime or nighttime views in the area? The impact of nighttime lighting depends on the type of use affected, the proximity to the affected use, the intensity of specific lighting, and the background or ambient level of the combined nighttime lighting. Nighttime ambient light levels may vary considerably depending on the age, condition, and abundance of point -of -light sources present in a particular view. The use of exterior 4.-6 PASTR1901 - Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <<06/18/20» 156 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J lighting for security and aesthetic illumination of architectural features may contribute to ambient nighttime lighting conditions. The spillover of light onto adjacent properties has the potential to interfere with certain activities, including vision, sleep, privacy, and general enjoyment of the natural nighttime condition. Light- sensitive uses include residential uses, some commercial and institutional uses, and, in some situations, natural areas. Changes in nighttime lighting may become significant if a proposed project would substantially increase ambient lighting conditions beyond its property line and project lighting would routinely spill over into adjacent light-sensitive land use areas. Reflective light (glare) is caused by sunlight or artificial light reflecting from finished surfaces (e.g., window glass) or other reflective materials. Glass and other materials can have many different reflectance characteristics. Buildings constructed of highly reflective materials from which the sun reflects at a low angle commonly cause adverse glare. Reflective light is common in urban areas. Glare generally does not result in the illumination of off -site locations but results in a visible source of light viewable from a distance. Nighttime illumination impacts are evaluated in terms of the Project's net change in ambient lighting conditions and proximity to light-sensitive land uses. The Project site is currently undeveloped and vacant. The Project site is predominantly surrounded by residential and commercial uses, and by vacant land. Sensitive receptors in the vicinity of the site include residential uses to the north, east, and south of the site. Other sources of light on and adjacent to the Project site include exterior lighting from adjacent residential neighborhoods, Garcia Park to the northwest of the Project site, streetlights, and vehicle headlights. Construction. Construction activities would occur primarily during daylight hours. For the purposes of this analysis, an 8-hour construction day is assumed (from roughly 7:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.). Any construction -related illumination during evening and nighttime hours would be shielded to the extent feasible, would consist of the minimum lighting required for safety and security purposes only, and would occur only for the duration required for the temporary construction process. Due to its limited scope and short duration, light resulting from construction activities would not substantially impact sensitive uses, substantially alter the character of off -site areas surrounding the construction area, or interfere with the performance of an off -site activity. Therefore, construction of the proposed Project would not create a new source of substantial light or glare that would adversely affect daytime or nighttime views in the area, and light impacts associated with construction would be less than significant. Operation. The proposed Project would be located within a developed area of Rancho Cucamonga, which currently emits lighting typical for an urban area (i.e., residential uses). Although the Project is considered a mixed -use development, the majority of the Project would consist of residential uses. As such, the proposed Project would introduce new sources of light to the Project site that are typical of residential uses. According to the Photometric Plan for the proposed Project (refer to Figure 4.1.1, Conceptual Photometric Plan, outdoor lighting proposed as part of the Project would include 105-watt parking lot pole lighting (15 ft in height), 65-watt decorative pole lighting (15 ft in height), and 12-watt decorative wall mounted lighting. All outdoor lighting would be directed PASTR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20)> 4-7 157 Le A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA JUNE 2020 This page intentionally left blank 4.8 P:\STR1901 - West bury\IInitial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx «06/18/20» 158 LEGEND O � KriW IED EFT PaRla16 LOT POLE IIBNT TYPE N FORWARD TF40VI LRam.IG OBTRBUIIO,•1 L6 ARCHIECILRAL LI6HT'p vZIIM♦RffiN+T-<&BiTOOMA-WW#gTpN 9B60R POlE ,SKTSiSAii ALIAfIlA BASE COVHi 3000 DEBw� K . � M-d..ORIFNSH 99£LTED k3Y O'M82 xb �a ',L � K)5W LHl ISFT PARIVJG LOT FOIE LM,M � 'y •. ® ❑ TYPE.LIGNiNG gSTRBIPION ba 30 41 ll6 pgCMECTtRpL L16e+Byly aRIInAPIID►t7T-a&BiTOCMA-NhViAOTION SE•604 BLDGI POLE aSNTbi54iV b: b. to PI.I.e.Tll.1 gpyE COYH2 -- ^m h, 3000 DEtSff K ` D.1y 'u ..COLORrTNB, SflECT® BY OwnHt },"�C`�. ho ASW L® 6FT DECORATNE POLE NBVIT ie v, \',., ' a�/ �. OO W TTFE V IJGFITNG DBTRBUfION •t' • LS ARGIIEC1lRAL LIGNINO '\ •. �i, \'' ) /ba • aLLATLM BA6E COVHt he h, • 1x t 3000 OE6REE K .m ••CO_ORMJ9V ERECTED BY ONleH2 b. 1 /. 65W L® EFT OECORATNE POE N6VR 7YPEV m � �:4 ,a •,., \ • O � TYPE N IJ6V(RJG 06'lRBUIIOI. a �/'�./ US PRCH1EC1lRAL LI6HINCi • h, he ��a� "�f'\a KiaifL�N-4am525AM-WN b �,a a•,a POtE ORNf$iSai1 LT hT 'm to Pllhi•LAI BASE COW3i \ ba \ 3000 DEGREE K t ba 'm SLOG G• j � ..CO_ORRiJEN EHECIED BY O'MEit • 'tee \ •t a �'\\ /v • u •� ann HIX19E SOE ENEiD 'm •, h t. ' •� 1.✓� %\ -S' R98i TO 91E RAN FOR LOCATKNS .Y , `u baba „� ` 1A b\Y• f 5 \ ,a tb : BCOG7 'o. •, xr y, ��bz �\ ,� ® ! Rw LED DEOORATNE wAu. ueNr 13\ oPexAT®BY PiaoTocaL — J . OwnER e,1APITAI�, b A ENWRC® rYPEV_~ ._ \\ .:e/. EVERfREHJ WHIN3 � t\1x 6Z4M L®SERE$ BLO('6 .m WEf LOCATKY•L LL LISTED /V b' ! B4DG4 TYPE// •�� v, ss •°vv BLOG7 1T eh /V y TYPEV ')��•v/ •,a\o'u .,s :� a\1\ \\ I } z • � •,a ' 'b ,( A a o bai BLDG54 1 a 7• � Ca" uh�•a , h .' a �� a • ,a �l /.', rYPE/ ,aho g(pGg e v�kL � *—TL''� �.s �?�`^�. b.rYPEN \0.'?°�ay\•,\bo •a3 b BLOG7 I ✓ e ,.e APEV b' L BLDG 6B 0 TYPE/// - - e.1L� ' e ��p,�^ e- •x� ibx° '9' ,(V�'�,'' > 3 1b r 6B be •m 'rs aT b. ,. m ., ,a ,. m ,. ,a m i i b i ,.., �9� � r � � z\., a, m ba m �a • ,a •,a ,. ,. ,. •„ •m , •,a •m a a � '„ ,�\�\ ,e e•m , ba be. -he ' ba J�,. _ _o� �s145��ia rxs b�\'• �7� ±T /�Sb.o 9 ♦ M1Y F. -- - TYPE// - � - _ TYPE// =� a e � h dB ❑ �_�� ,; �`vv o. t a ♦ oa \ L SA 0 45 90 FEET SOURCE: LOB Inc. FIGURE 4.1.1 Westbury Residential Project Conceptual Photometric Plan I:\STR1901\G\Photometric Plan.cdr (7/1/2019) 159 Le A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA JUNE 2020 This page intentionally left blank 4.10 P:\STR1901 - West bury\IInitial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx «06/18/20» 160 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J downward and shielded to minimize off -site spill. Additionally, the location of all exterior lighting would comply with lighting standards established in Chapter 17.58, Outdoor Lighting Standards, of the City's Municipal Code. Impacts related to glare from on -site lighting would not occur because the exterior building materials and facade would not include highly reflective materials (e.g., windows or glass with mirror-like tints) As specified in Regulatory Compliance Measure (RCM) AES-1, the proposed Project would be required to comply with lighting standards described in the Photometric Plan. Although the proposed Project is not anticipated to incorporate design features that would result in excessive lighting or the generation of glare on the site, the Photometric Plan and any other lighting plans are subject to City review and approval as part of the site plan review process. Therefore, lighting provided as part of the proposed Project would be largely consistent with the type and intensity of existing lighting in the Project vicinity. The final lighting for the Project would be subject to City review and approval as part of the site plan review process, and would be implemented in compliance with the City's Municipal Code. As such, the proposed Project would not create a new source of substantial light or glare that would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area. No mitigation is required. Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Regulatory Compliance Measures and Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required, but the proposed Project would be required to adhere to relevant sections of the City's Municipal Code as described in RCM-AES-1. RCM-AES-1 Final Lighting and Photometric Plans. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the Applicant shall submit Final Lighting and Photometric Plans for review and approval by the Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) Planning Department, or designee. The lighting and photometric plans shall be prepared by a qualified engineer (i.e., an engineer who is an active member of the Illuminating Engineering Society of North America) and shall comply with applicable standards of the City's Municipal Code. The lighting plan shall address all aspects of lighting, including infrastructure, on -site driveways, recreation, safety, signage, and promotional lighting, if any. In accordance with Municipal Code Section 17.58, Outdoor Lighting Standards, the Final Photometric Plan shall show evidence that all lighting is shielded or recessed and directed downward and away from adjoining properties and rights -of -way. PASTR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20)> 4-11 161 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 4.2 AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY RESOURCES In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Department of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest resources, including timberland, are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to information compiled by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the state's inventory of forest land, including the Forest and Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment Project; and the forest carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest Protocols adopted by the California Air Resources Board. Less than Potentially Significant with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring ❑ ❑ ❑ Program of the California Resources Agency, to non- agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a ❑ ❑ ❑ Williamson Act contract? c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code Section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code Section ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code Section 51104(g))? d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ to non -forest use? e) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non -forest use? Impact Analysis a) Would the project convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland) as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? The Project site is not used for agricultural production and is not designated Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance on maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency.' Rancho Cucamonga and the surrounding region contain very little Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or 8 California Department of Conservation. California Important Farmland Finder. 2016. https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/DLRP/CIFF/ (accessed May 9, 2019). 4-12 P:\STR1901 - Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <<06/18/20» 162 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J Farmland of Statewide importance. The closest farmland to the Project site is 1.17 mi north of the Project site near the intersection of East Avenue and the Pacific Electric Trail. As discussed in the Phase I ESA, historical aerial photos show that the northern and southern adjacent properties contained an orchard with residential and farm buildings until about 1966, and that the eastern, western, and southwestern adjacent properties contained vineyards until about 1967. Currently, the area surrounding the Project site, including the adjacent property to the north and south, is developed with residential and commercial uses. Implementation of the proposed Project would introduce a similar land use to the area. The proposed Project would not convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, Farmland of Statewide Importance, or any other type of farmland to a non- agricultural use. Therefore, no impacts to Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance would occur, and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: No Impact. Mitigation measures: No mitigation is required. b) Would the project conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? The Project site is currently zoned Community Commercial (CC) and is located within the FBOD. The Project site is not used for agricultural production and is not protected by, or eligible for, a Williamson Act contract. The Project area consists of Urban and Built -Up Land, and the Project site itself is non -enrolled land (land not enrolled in a Williamson Act contract and not mapped by the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program).' There is no agriculturally zoned land or land under a Williamson Act contract in Rancho Cucamonga. Therefore, no impacts to agricultural use or a Williamson Act contract would occur, and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: No Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. c) Would the project conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code Section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code Section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code Section 51104(g))? The Project site is not used for timberland production, is not zoned as forest land or timberland, and does not contain forest land or timberland. The Project site is in an urban, built -out portion of Rancho Cucamonga. There are no forest or timberland resources in the vicinity of the Project site. The proposed Project would not convert forest land to nonforest use. Therefore, no impacts to forest land or timberland would occur, and no mitigation is required. 9 California Department of Conservation. 2017. Division of Land Resource Protection. State of California Williamson Act Contract Land. PASTR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20)> 4-13 163 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 Significance Determination: No Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. d) Would the project result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forestland to non -forest use? The proposed Project was previously rough graded and is currently undeveloped. The proposed Project would not convert forest land to a nonforest use. Likewise, the Project site would not contribute to environmental changes that could result in conversion of forest land to nonforest use. Therefore, no impacts to forest land would occur, and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: No Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. e) Would the project involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non -forest use? The Project site is currently zoned Community Commercial (CC) and is located within the FBOD. The Project site is not used for agricultural production or designated or zoned for agricultural uses. The proposed Project would not convert farmland to a non-agricultural use. Likewise, the proposed Project site would not contribute to environmental changes that could result in conversion of farmland to non-agricultural use. As previously discussed in Response 4.2(a), adjacent properties were previously developed with agricultural uses such as orchards and vineyards. These properties are currently developed with residential and commercial uses. Therefore, no impact to farmland or forest land would occur, and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: No Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. 4-14 PASTR1901 - Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <<06/18/20» 164 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J 4.3 AIR QUALITY Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management district or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Less than Potentially Significant with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable ❑ ❑ ® ❑ air quality plan? b) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non- ❑ ❑ ® ❑ attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard? c) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant ❑ ❑ ® ❑ concentrations? d) Result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) ❑ ❑ ® ❑ adversely affecting a substantial number of people? Discussion An Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Analysis for the proposed Project was prepared in March 2018.10 The analysis in this section is based on the findings of the Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Analysis (Appendix A). Impact Analysis a) Would the project conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? The proposed Project is located within the South Coast Air Basin (Basin). The South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) is the regional government agency that monitors and regulates air pollution within the Basin. The Federal Clean Air Act and the California Clean Air Act mandate the control and reduction of specific air pollutants. Under these acts, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the California Air Resources Board (CARB) have established ambient air quality standards for specific "criteria" pollutants, designed to protect public health and welfare. Primary criteria pollutants include carbon monoxide (CO), volatile organic compounds (VOC), nitrogen oxides (NOx), particulate matter (PM1o), sulfur oxides (SOx), and lead. Secondary criteria pollutants include ozone (03) and fine particulate matter (PM2.5). These ambient air quality standards are levels of contaminants which represent safe levels that avoid specific adverse health effects associated with each criteria pollutant. An Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) describes air pollution control strategies to be undertaken by a city or county in a region classified as a nonattainment area to meet the requirements of the Federal Clean Air Act. The main purpose of an AQMP is to bring an area into compliance with the 10 LSA. 2018. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Analysis. March. PASTR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20)> 4-15 165 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 requirements of federal and State ambient air quality standards (AAQS). The applicable air quality plan is the SCAQMD's adopted 2016 AQMP. The AQMP is based on regional growth projections developed by the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG). Only new or amended General Plan elements, Specific Plans, and significantly unique projects need to undergo a consistency review due to the air quality plan strategy being based on projections from local General Plans. Because the AQMP is based on regional growth projections developed by SCAG, projects that are deemed consistent with a specific General Plan are usually found to be consistent with the AQMP. While the proposed mixed -use development would require a Development Code and Zoning Map Amendment to change the zoning designation, land use tables, and figures from Community Commercial (CC) to Mixed Use (MU) District, the proposed use of the site is consistent with the City's General Plan designation of mixed -use. Additionally, rezoning the property from Commercial to Mixed Use would result in a less intensive use with regard to vehicle trips, and the mixed -use project would be consistent with the policies provided in SCAG's RTP/SCS that promote walkable communities (e.g., new residential uses located near transit stops along Foothill Boulevard and neighborhood stores). The City's General Plan is consistent with the SCAG Regional Comprehensive Plan Guidelines and the SCAQMD AQMP. Pursuant to the methodology provided in Chapter 12 of the 1993 SCAQMD CEQA Air Quality Handbook, consistency with the Basin 2016 AQMP is affirmed when a project (1) does not increase the frequency or severity of an air quality standards violation or cause a new violation, and (2) is consistent with the growth assumptions in the AQMP.11 Consistency review is presented below. 1. The proposed Project would result in short-term construction and long-term pollutant emissions that are less than the CEQA significance emissions thresholds established by the SCAQMD, as demonstrated above. Therefore, the Project would not result in an increase in the frequency or severity of any air quality standards violation and would not cause a new air quality standards violation. 2. The SCAQMD CEQA Air Quality Handbook indicates that consistency with AQMP growth assumptions must be analyzed for new or amended General Plan elements, Specific Plans, and significant projects. Significant projects include airports, electrical generating facilities, petroleum and gas refineries, designation of oil drilling districts, water ports, solid waste disposal sites, and offshore drilling facilities. Therefore, the proposed Project is not defined as significant for the purposes of the AQMP consistency analysis. Based on the analysis presented above, the proposed Project is consistent with the City's General Plan and the regional AQMP. Therefore, the proposed Project would not conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan and would result in a less than significant impact. No mitigation is required. 11 South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). 1993. CEQA Air Quality Handbook. Website: http://www.agmd.gov/home/rules-compliance/ceqa/air-quality-analysis-handbook/ceqa-air- quality-handbook-(1993) (accessed June 24, 2019). 4-16 PASTR1901 - Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <<06/18/20» 166 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. b) Would the project result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard? The Basin is currently designated nonattainment for the federal and State standards for 03 and PM2.5. In addition, the Basin is in nonattainment for the PM10 standard. The Basin's nonattainment status is attributed to the region's development history. Past, present, and future development projects contribute to the region's adverse air quality impacts on a cumulative basis. By its very nature, air pollution is largely a cumulative impact. No single project is sufficient in size to, by itself, result in nonattainment of AAQS. Instead, a project's individual emissions contribute to existing cumulatively significant adverse air quality impacts. If a project's contribution to the cumulative impact is considerable, then the project's impact on air quality would be considered significant. In developing thresholds of significance for air pollutants, the SCAQMD considered the emission levels for which a project's individual emissions would be cumulatively considerable. If a project exceeds the identified significance thresholds, its emissions would be cumulatively considerable, resulting in significant adverse air quality impacts to the region's existing air quality conditions. Therefore, additional analysis to assess cumulative impacts is not necessary. The following analysis assesses the potential project -level air quality impacts associated with construction and operation of the proposed Project. Construction Emissions. Air quality impacts could occur during construction of the proposed Project due to soil disturbance and equipment exhaust. Major sources of emissions during grading and site preparation include: (1) exhaust emissions from construction vehicles, (2) equipment and fugitive dust generated by construction vehicles and equipment traveling over exposed surfaces, and (3) soil disturbances from grading and backfilling. Potential pollutants include CO, NOx, VOCs, directly emitted particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM1o), and toxic air contaminants (TACs) such as diesel exhaust particulate matter. Project construction activities would include site preparation, grading, building construction, paving, and architectural coating activities. Construction -related effects on air quality from the proposed Project would be greatest during the site preparation phase due to the disturbance of soils. If not properly controlled, these activities would temporarily generate particulate emissions. Sources of fugitive dust would include disturbed soils at the construction site. Unless properly controlled, vehicles leaving the site would deposit dirt and mud on local streets, which could be an additional source of airborne dust after it dries. PM10 emissions would vary from day to day, depending on the nature and magnitude of construction activity and local weather conditions. PM10 emissions would depend on soil moisture, silt content of soil, wind speed, and the amount of operating equipment. Larger dust particles would settle near the source, while fine particles would be dispersed over greater distances from the construction site. PASTR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20)> 4-17 167 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 Construction emissions were estimated for the proposed Project using the California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMOd), Version 2016.3.2, consistent with SCAQMD recommendations. For the purposes of this analysis, the construction schedule for the proposed Project was based on an expected September 2020 start date and June 2022 completion date. Rule 403 measures were included in the CalEEMod analysis. Construction -related emissions are presented in Table 4.3.A. Table 4.3.A: Short -Term Regional Construction Emissions Construction Phase Total Regional Pollutant Emissions (Ibs/day) VOC NOx CO sox Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 Site Preparation 4 42 22 <1 7 2 4 2 Grading 3 26 17 <1 3 1 1 1 Building Construction 3 23 23 <1 2 1 <1 1 Paving 2 11 13 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Architectural Coating 47 2 3 <1 <1 <1 <1 1 Peak Daily 47 42 23 <1 9 6 SCAQMD Thresholds 75 100 550 150 150 55 Significant Emissions? No No No No No No Source: Compiled by LSA (March 2020). CO = carbon monoxide Ibs/day = pounds per day NOx = nitrogen oxides PM2.S = particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in size PM>,o = particulate matter less than 10 microns in size SCAQMD = South Coast Air Quality Management District Sox = sulfur oxides VOC = volatile organic compounds The PM10 and PM2.5 fugitive dust emissions are included in Table 4.3.A. Fugitive dust emissions would be substantially reduced by compliance with SCAQMD Ruleand 403 (compliance with SCAQMD Rule 403 is required for all projects in the Basin). The implementation of Rule 403 measures were accounted for in the Project construction emission estimates. Applicable requirements of Rule 403 included in the analysis are as follows: • Water active sites at least three times daily (locations where grading is to take place will be thoroughly watered prior to earthmoving). • Cover all trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil, or other loose materials, or maintain at least 2 ft (0.6 meter [m]) of freeboard (vertical space between the top of the load and the top of the trailer) in accordance with the requirements of California Vehicle Code Section 23114. • Reduce traffic speeds on all unpaved roads to 15 mph or less. Compliance with Rule 403 would reduce fugitive dust emissions associated with Project construction to a less than significant level. In addition to dust -related PM10 emissions, heavy trucks and construction equipment powered by gasoline and diesel engines would generate CO, SO, NO., VOCs and some soot particulate (PM2.5 and PM1o) in exhaust emissions. If construction activities were to increase traffic congestion in the area, CO and other emissions from traffic would increase slightly while those vehicles idle in traffic. These emissions would be temporary in nature and limited to the immediate area surrounding the construction site. 4-18 P:\STR1901 - Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <<06/18/20» 168 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J As shown in Table 4.3.A, construction emissions associated with the Project would be less than significant for VOC, NO, CO, SO, PM2.5, and PM10 exhaust emissions. Therefore, construction of the proposed Project would not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the Project region is in nonattainment under an applicable federal or State AAQS. Impacts would be less than significant and no mitigation is required. Operational Emissions. Long-term air pollutant emission impacts are those associated with mobile sources (e.g., vehicle trips), energy sources (e.g., electricity and natural gas), and area sources (e.g., architectural coatings and the use of landscape maintenance equipment) related to the proposed Project. PM10 emissions result from running exhaust, tire and brake wear, and the entrainment of dust into the atmosphere from vehicles traveling on paved roadways. Entrainment of PM10 occurs when vehicle tires pulverize small rocks and pavement and the vehicle wakes generate airborne dust. The contribution of tire and brake wear is small compared to the other particulate matter emission processes. Gasoline -powered engines have small rates of particulate matter emissions compared with diesel -powered vehicles. Energy source emissions result from activities in buildings for which electricity and natural gas are used. The quantity of emissions is the product of usage intensity (i.e., the amount of electricity or natural gas) and the emission factor of the fuel source. Major sources of energy demand for the proposed Project could include building mechanical systems, such as heating and air conditioning, lighting, and plug-in electronics, such as refrigerators or computers. Greater building or appliance efficiency reduces the amount of energy for a given activity and thus lowers the resultant emissions. The emission factor is determined by the fuel source, with cleaner energy sources like renewable energy producing fewer emissions than conventional sources. The Project would comply with the 2019 California Building Standards Code (California Code of Regulations, Title 24), including the major energy efficiency measures that are now required in all homes. The project would incorporate the following in building plans as a project design feature: • Solar photovoltaic systems shall be installed. • Low -emission water heaters shall be used. Solar water heaters are encouraged. • Exterior windows shall utilize window treatments for efficient energy conservation. The 2019 Title 24 standards also encourage demand responsive technologies including battery storage, heat pump water heaters, and building thermal envelope improvements through high performance attics, walls, and windows to improve comfort and energy savings. Typically, area -source emissions consist of direct sources of air emissions located at the Project site, including architectural coatings and the use of landscape maintenance equipment. Area -source emissions associated with the Project would include emissions from the use of architectural coatings, consumer products, and landscaping equipment. PASTR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20)> 4-19 169 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 Long-term operational emissions associated with the proposed Project were calculated using CalEEMOd. Based on trip generation factors provided in the Traffic Impact Analysis prepared for the proposed Project, the Project would generate 1,035 daily trips.12 These trips were entered in CalEEMod and the fleet mixes adjusted to represent the expected vehicle mix for each land use. The modeling is compliant with SCAQMD Rule 445 and assumes that there would be no wood stoves and all fireplaces would be natural gas -fueled. The long-term operational emissions associated with the proposed Project are shown in Table 4.3.B. Table 4.3.13: Opening Year Regional Operational Emissions Source Pollutant Emissions (Ibs/day) VOCs NOx CO Sox PM10 PM2.5 Area 3 2 12 <1 <1 <1 Energy <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Mobile 2 2 23 <1 8 2 Total Project Emissions 5 4 35 <1 8 2 SCAQMD Thresholds 55 55 550 150 150 55 Significant? No No No No No No Source: Compiled by LSA (March 2020). CO = carbon monoxide Ibs/day = pounds per day NOS = nitrogen oxides PM2.S = particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in size PM>,o = particulate matter less than 10 microns in size SCAQMD = South Coast Air Quality Management District SOS = sulfur oxides VOC = volatile organic compounds The results shown in Table 4.3.13 indicate the proposed Project would not exceed the significance criteria for daily VOC, NO, CO, SO, PM1o, or PM2.5 emissions. Therefore, operation of the proposed Project would not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the Project region is in nonattainment under an applicable federal or State AAQS and impacts would be less than significant. No mitigation is required. Localized Significance Analysis. The SCAQMD published its Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology in July 2008, recommending that all air quality analyses include an assessment of air quality impacts to nearby sensitive receptors.13 This guidance was used to analyze potential localized air quality impacts associated with construction of the proposed Project. Localized significance thresholds (LSTs) are developed based on the size or total area of the emission source, the ambient air quality in the source receptor area (SRA), and the distance to the project. The SCAQMD defines structures that house persons (e.g., children, the elderly, persons with pre-existing respiratory or cardiovascular illness, and athletes and others who engage in frequent exercise) or places where they gather (i.e., residences, schools, playgrounds, child-care centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, and athletic fields) as sensitive receptors. LSTs are based on the ambient concentrations of that pollutant within the project SRA and the distance to the nearest sensitive receptor. SCAQMD provides LST screening tables for 25 m, 50 m, 100 m, 200 m, and 500 m source - receptor distances. The closest existing sensitive receptors are residences across East Avenue, approximately 80 ft from the closest construction operations. 12 Fehr & Peers. 2018. Draft Westbury Transportation Impact Study. February. 13 SCAQMD. 2008. Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology. July. 4-20 P:\STR1901 - Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <<06/18/20» 170 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J For the proposed Project, the appropriate SRA for the LST is the Northwest San Bernardino Valley area (SRA 32). The total area of the proposed Project is 3.76 ac. Based on SCAQMD methodology and the construction equipment planned, it is possible that the entire 3.76 ac could be disturbed on a peak day; thus, the 2 ac and 5 ac construction thresholds have been interpolated to derive 3.76 ac LSTs for construction emissions. For LST impacts, the SCAQMD guidance specifies that only on -site emissions are to be included. The CalEEMod construction results are delineated as on- or off -site. However, the CalEEMod operation results only show on- and off -site emissions combined. On -site operational emissions would primarily occur from stationary sources. While vehicle emissions would be the largest source of Project -related operational emissions, only a small portion would occur on the site. Based on anticipated travel routes, it is estimated that less than 5 percent of the overall vehicle travel would occur on site. A total of 5 percent is considered conservative because the following average trip lengths are assumed from the CalEEMod defaults: (1) 14.7 miles for home to work, (2) 5.9 miles for home to shopping, and (3) 8.7 miles for other types of trips. The average on - site distance driven is unlikely to be even 1,000 ft, which is approximately 2 percent of the total miles traveled. Considering the total trip length included in the CalEEMod, the 5 percent assumption is conservative. Project construction emissions were compared to the LST screening tables in SRA 32, based on a 80 ft source -receptor distance and a 3.76 ac Project size. The results of the LST analysis, summarized in Tables 4.3.0 and 4.3.D, indicate that the proposed Project would not result in an exceedance of a SCAQMD LST during Project construction or operation. Therefore, the proposed Project would result in less than significant localized air quality impacts during construction and operation and no mitigation is required. Table 4.3.C: Construction Localized Impacts Analysis Emissions Sources Pollutant Emissions (Ibs/day) NOx c0 PM10 PMz.s On -Site Emissions 42 22 9 6 LSTs 229 1,796 12 7 Significant Emissions? No No No No Source: Compiled by LSA (March 2020). Note: Source Receptor Area — Northwest San Bernardino Valley, 3.76 acres, receptors at 80 feet CO = carbon monoxide NI = nitrogen oxides Ibs/day = pounds per day PM2.5 = particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in size LST = local significance threshold PM,. = particulate matter less than 10 microns in size Table 4.3.D: Long -Term Operational Localized Impacts Analysis Emissions Sources Pollutant Emissions (Ibs/day) NOx c0 PM10 PMz.s On -Site Emissions 2 13 <1 <1 LSTs 229 1,795 3 2 Significant Emissions? No No No No Source: Compiled by LSA (March 2020). Note: Source Receptor Area — Northwest San Bernardino Valley, 3.76 acres, receptors at 150 feet, on -site traffic 5 percent of total. CO = carbon monoxide NOx = nitrogen oxides Ibs/day = pounds per day PM2.5 = particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in size LST = localized significance thresholds PMD = particulate matter less than 10 microns in size P:\STR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20)> 4-21 171 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. c) Would the project expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? As identified above, the SCAQMD defines structures that house persons (e.g., children, the elderly, persons with pre-existing respiratory or cardiovascular illness, and athletes and others who engage in frequent exercise) or places where they gather (i.e., residences, schools, playgrounds, child-care centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, and athletic fields) as sensitive receptors. Sensitive receptors are defined as people who have an increased sensitivity to air pollution or environmental contaminants. The closest existing sensitive receptors are residences across East Avenue, approximately 80 ft from the closest construction operations. The off -road diesel construction equipment during grading and excavation activities emits most of the toxic air contaminant (TAC) emissions during Project construction. Based on the SCAQMD methodology, health effects from carcinogenic TACs are usually described in terms of "Individual Cancer Risk", which is the likelihood that a person exposed to concentrations of TACs over a 70-year lifetime would contract cancer, based on the use of standard risk -assessment. California regulations limit idling from both on -road and off -road diesel -powered equipment. CARB enforces idling limitations and compliance with diesel fleet regulations. • Minimize idling time either by shutting equipment off when not in use or reducing the time of idling to 5 minutes [California Code of Regulations, Title 13, sections 2449(d)(3) and 2485]. Provide clear signage that posts this requirement for workers at the entrances to the site. • Provide current certificate(s) of compliance for CARB's In -Use Off -Road Diesel -Fueled Fleets Regulation [California Code of Regulations, Title 13, sections 2449 and 2449.1]. Because the construction duration would last less than 2 years, and the phases that require the most heavy-duty diesel vehicle usage (e.g., grading) would last for a much shorter period of time (e.g., less than 1 month), Project construction would not result in a long-term (i.e., 70-year) substantial source of TAC emissions. In addition, the SCAQMD CEQA guidance does not require a health risk assessment for short-term construction emissions. It is therefore not necessary or meaningful to evaluate long-term cancer impacts from construction activities that take place over a relatively short duration. There would also be no residual TAC emissions after construction. As such, the Project's construction TAC emission impact would be less than significant. Construction of the proposed Project may expose sensitive receptors to airborne particulates, as well as a small quantity of construction equipment pollutants (i.e., usually diesel -fueled vehicles and equipment). However, construction contractors would be required to implement measures to reduce emissions by following SCAQMD standard construction practices. As shown in Table 4.3.0 and Table 4.3.D, the proposed Project would not result in significant localized emissions during construction or operation. Therefore, once the Project is constructed, it would not be a source of 4-22 PASTR1901 - Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <<06/18/20» 172 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J substantial pollutant emissions, and sensitive receptors would not be exposed to substantial pollutant concentrations during Project construction or operation. This impact is considered less than significant and no mitigation is required. Vehicular trips associated with operation of the proposed Project would contribute to congestion at intersections and along roadway segments in the project vicinity. Localized air quality impacts could occur when emissions from vehicular traffic increase as a result of the proposed Project. The primary mobile -source pollutant of local concern is CO, a direct function of vehicle idling time and, thus, of traffic flow conditions. Reduced speeds and vehicular congestion at intersections result in increased CO emissions. As described in the Draft Westbury Transportation Impact Study (Fehr & Peers 2018), all study area intersections currently operate at a satisfactory level of service (LOS). With the addition of the proposed Project in the existing setting and all future scenarios, vehicle speeds and vehicular congestion at all study area intersections surrounding the project site would continue to operate at satisfactory LOS. Therefore, the Project could be implemented in an existing setting with no significant peak -hour intersection impacts. Given the extremely low level of CO concentrations in the Project area and the lack of traffic impacts at any surrounding intersections, Project -related vehicles are not expected to contribute significantly to CO concentrations exceeding the State or federal CO standards. Because no CO hot -spot would occur, there would be no Project -related impacts on CO concentrations. Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. d) Would the project result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people? Heavy-duty equipment on the Project site during construction would emit odors, primarily from equipment exhaust. However, the construction activity would cease to occur after individual construction is completed. No other sources of objectionable odors have been identified for the proposed Project, and no mitigation measures are required. SCAQMD Rule 402 regarding nuisances states: "A person shall not discharge from any source whatsoever such quantities of air contaminants or other material which cause injury, detriment, nuisance, or annoyance to any considerable number of persons or to the public, or which endanger the comfort, repose, health or safety of any such persons or the public, or which cause, or have a natural tendency to cause, injury or damage to business or property." The proposed uses are not anticipated to emit any objectionable odors. Therefore, the proposed Project would not result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people. This impact would be less than significant and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. PASTR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20)> 4-23 173 A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION LC J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 4.4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Less than Potentially Significant with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special -status species in local or ❑ ® ❑ ❑ regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California ❑ ❑ ❑ Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, ❑ ❑ ❑ vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with ❑ ® ❑ ❑ established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ❑ ❑ ® ❑ ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or ❑ ❑ ❑ other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? Discussion The following section is based on Results of a Biological/Regulatory Overview for an 11.45-Acre Property (APN# 1100-191-04) Located in Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California (Biological Technical Report) (Glenn Lukos Associates, Inc., October 2016) and the Arborist Heritage Tree Inventory at Westbury Project in Rancho Cucamonga, California (Arborist Survey Report) (LSA, November 2017). These reports are included in Appendices B and C, respectively. 4-24 PASTR1901 - Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <<06/18/20» 174 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J Impact Analysis a) Would the project have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special -status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? The Project site is currently undeveloped and vacant, with the exception of a cell tower and a building pad associated with a CVWD pumping station along the southern property line. The Project site is vacant but highly disturbed with low growth consisting mostly of nonnative vegetation. According to the Biological Technical Report (Glenn Lukos Associates, Inc., October 2016; Appendix B), the Project site is highly disturbed due to long-established land use practices on the site, including disking and mowing. The disturbed condition of the Project site is generally not suitable to support special -status species, and no known candidate, sensitive, or special -status species were observed inhabiting the Project site during the general survey. Special -Status Animals. Some special -status species have the potential to occur on site, including the burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia), Delhi sands flower -loving fly (DSF) (Rhaphiomidas terminatus abdominalis), Los Angeles pocket mouse (Perognathus longimembris brevinasus), San Bernardino kangaroo rat (Dipodomys merriami parvus), coast horned lizard (Phrynosoma blainvillii), silvery legless lizard (Anniella pulchra pulchra), ferruginous hawk (euteo regalis), and loggerhead shrike (Lanius ludovicianus). According to the Biological Technical Report, most of these species have a low potential to occur on the Project site due to the lack of aquatic and/or suitable habitat and the highly disturbed nature of the Project site. Although most of the species known to occur within the Project vicinity have a low potential of occurring on the Project site, the results of the Biological Technical Report indicate that several endangered, candidate, sensitive, or special -status species may be present on the Project site. Based on visits to the Project site and a review of soil maps, the Project site contains Tujunga gravelly loamy sand (72 percent of the site) and Tujunga loamy sand (28 percent of the site), both of which are known to support the DSF, which is federally listed as Endangered. The Project site also contains annual bur -sage (Ambrosia acanthicarpa), California croton (Croton californicus), California buckwheat (Eriogonum fasciculatum), sand aster (Corethrogyne glandulifera), and telegraph weed (Heterotheca grandiflora) on site, all of which, as previously stated, have been documented to be associated with the presence of DSF. As such, the Applicant would be required to comply with Mitigation Measure BIO-1, which itself requires the preparation of a DSF habitat assessment to ascertain the absence of DSF on the Project site. Compliance with Mitigation Measure BIO-1 would reduce potential impacts to DSF to a less than significant level. According to the Biological Technical Report, the Project site also supports suitable habitat for the burrowing owl, which is a Federal and State Species of Special Concern. As such, implementation of Mitigation Measure BIO-2 would be required to minimize potential impacts to burrowing owls that may be present on site. Mitigation Measure BIO-2 requires the preparation of focused habitat surveys to confirm the presence/absence of burrowing owls on the Project site. If burrowing owls are determined to be present on the property, then the owls would need to be relocated following PASTR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20)> 4-25 175 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 accepted California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) protocols. Compliance with Mitigation Measure 1310-2 would reduce potential impacts to burrowing owls to a less than significant level. The Biological Technical Report also concluded that the presence of the Los Angeles pocket mouse and San Bernardino kangaroo rat could not be ruled out on the Project site due to past mapping indicating the presence of both species in the Project area. Mitigation Measure 1310-3 requires a habitat assessment for small mammals to rule out the presence of sensitive small mammal species on the Project site, including the Los Angeles pocket mouse and the San Bernardino kangaroo rat. In the event the Los Angeles pocket mouse and San Bernardino kangaroo rat are identified on the site, Mitigation Measure 13I0-3 outlines protocols to be followed to mitigate potential impacts to both species. There is low to moderate potential for the coast horned lizard or the silvery legless lizard to occur on site. Nevertheless, Mitigation Measure 1310-4 requires a visual survey and avoidance if construction is performed at at time of year when reptiles are active on the Project site. With implementation of 1310-4, impacts to non -listed special -status reptiles would be less than significant. Special -Status Habitat/Vegetation. Although the Project site has the potential to contain sensitive animal species, the subject property is highly disturbed and does not support any special -status plants due to a lack of suitable habitat. According to the Biological Technical Report, the special - status plants evaluated for the property require habitat that is not present on the Project site. Additionally, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Critical Habitat for Threatened and Endangered Species does not identify any locations of critical habitat within approximately 2 mi of the Project site.14 The closest known critical habitat is approximately 2 mi to the north of the Project site." Therefore, no impacts to sensitive or special -status species would result from implementation of the proposed Project, and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: Potentially Significant Impact. Mitigation Measures: 1310-1 Delhi Sands Flower -Loving Fly Surveys. Prior to grading or any other ground - disturbing activity, a qualified biologist (i.e., a permitted Delhi Sands flower -loving fly [DSF] biologist) shall conduct a survey for DSF habitat to determine if focused surveys for DSF are required. If focused DSF surveys are determined to be required, the Project Applicant will be required to conduct focused DSF surveys in accordance with United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Interim General Survey Guidelines for the Delhi Sands Flower -Loving Fly (1996). USFWS protocol requires surveys to be conducted over the course of 2 consecutive years to confirm the 14 United States Fish and Wildlife Service. Critical Habitat for Threatened & Endangered Species Webviewer. https://fws.maps.arcgis.com/home/webmap/viewer.html?webmap=9d8de5e265ad4f e09893cf75b8dbfb77 (accessed May 24, 2019). is The closest known critical habitat is within the foothills of the San Gabriel Mountains and contains San Bernardino Merriam's kangaroo rat. 4-26 PASTR1901 - Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <<06/18/20» 176 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION DUNE 2020 W ESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J absence of DSF. If no DSF habitat is observed on site during the pre -construction survey, a letter shall be prepared by the qualified biologist documenting the results of the survey. The letter shall be submitted to the Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department, or designee, prior to issuance of any grading permits, and no further action is required. If DSF is observed to be present on site during the pre -construction clearance survey, consultation with the USFWS shall occur to determine the next appropriate steps. Areas currently occupied by DSF habitat shall be avoided to the extent feasible. If DSF habitat cannot be avoided, replacement of habitat at a 1:1 ratio, or as required by the USFWS, shall be implemented. Project effects to DSF must be fully mitigated through avoidance or the replacement of habitat on or off site in coordination with the USFWS and the Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department, or designee, prior to the issuance of any grading activities. B10-2 Burrowing Owl Surveys. Prior to grading or any other ground -disturbing activity, a qualified biologist shall conduct a habitat assessment for burrowing owls to determine if suitable burrowing owl habitat is present in and adjacent to the Project site. If suitable habitat is present, then focused breeding season surveys shall be conducted consistent with the procedures outlined in Appendix D of the 2012 California Department of Fish and Wildlife Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (CDFW Staff Report). Regardless of whether burrowing owls are detected during focused breeding season surveys, a pre -construction survey shall be performed by a qualified biologist no less than 14 days prior to ground -disturbing activities. If no burrowing owls are observed on site during the pre -construction clearance survey, a letter shall be prepared by the qualified biologist documenting the results of the survey. The letter shall be submitted to the Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department, or designee, prior to issuance of any grading permits, and no further action is required. If presence of burrowing owl is determined either during the focused breeding season surveys or pre -construction surveys, the applicant shall contact CDFW prior to commencing project activities and conduct an impact assessment to determine appropriate mitigation in accordance with the CDFW Staff Report. If one or more burrowing owls are observed on site during the pre -construction clearance survey, and permanent avoidance of the owl(s) by the project is not feasible, then the occupied area shall be avoided with an appropriate setback buffer as determined by the qualified biologist until either the burrowing owl(s) can be excluded from the site (subject to CDFW approval) or the owls leave the site on their own. In accordance with the CDFW Staff Report, the size of the setback buffer should be in the range of 50 meters to 500 meters and will be determined through a combination of the extent of owl use (i.e., nesting sites versus non -breeding use), the time of year, and the level of disturbance. PASTR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20)> 4-27 177 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION JUNE 2020 If burrowing owls cannot be avoided by the proposed Project a qualified biologist shall prepare and submit a Burrowing Owl Exclusion Plan to CDFW in accordance with Appendix E of the CDFW Staff Report for review/approval prior to the commencement of disturbance activities onsite. Burrow exclusion involves the installation of one-way doors in burrow openings during the nonbreeding season to temporarily or permanently exclude burrowing owls and to close burrows after verifying through site monitoring and scoping that the burrows are empty. Existing or artificial burrows situated less than 75 meters from the Project site are the ideal scenario for successful passive relocation. Additional factors for successful passive relocation are included in the CDFW Staff Report; however, if adjacent lands are not available then alternate mitigation will be identified. When a qualified biologist determines that burrowing owls are no longer occupying the Project site and passive relocation is complete, construction activities may continue. A final letter report shall be prepared by the qualified biologist documenting the results of the passive relocation. The letter shall be submitted to CDFW and the Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department, or designee, prior to the issuance of any grading activities. If mitigation will include the conservation of adjacent or offsite lands for burrowing owls, then the Applicant will coordinate with CDFW and the City of Rancho Cucamonga to ensure that the permanent conservation and management of burrowing owl habitat is addressed such that the habitat acreage, number of burrows and burrowing owl impacts are replaced consistent with the CDFW Staff Report. A qualified biologist shall confirm that conservation lands contain natural unoccupied burrows at a 2:1 replacement ratio, or otherwise the biologist will construct artificial burrows for use by the owls. Monitoring and management of the replacement burrow site(s) shall be conducted and a reporting plan shall be prepared. The objective shall be to manage the replacement burrow sites for the benefit of burrowing owls (e.g., minimizing weed cover), with the specific goal of maintaining the functionality of the burrows for a minimum of 2 years. 11310-3: Los Angeles Pocket Mouse and San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat Surveys. Prior to grading or any other ground -disturbing activity, a qualified biologist (i.e., a permitted biologist allowed to handle the Los Angeles pocket mouse [LAPM] and the San Bernardino kangaroo rat [SBKR]) shall conduct a survey to identify suitable habitat for the LAPM and the SBKR. Should suitable habitat be identified on the site, the qualified biologist shall conduct a minimum of 5 nights of small mammal trapping consecutively, in accordance with protocol established by the USFWS and the CDFW. A final letter report shall be prepared by the qualified biologist documenting the results of the survey and any mitigation measures that are recommended to be implemented as part of the Project, if such measures are required. The letter shall be submitted to the Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department, or designee, prior to the issuance of any grading activities. 4-28 PASTR1901 - Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <<06/18/20» 178 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION DUNE 2020 W ESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J If the Los Angeles pocket mouse is identified on the site, the qualified mammal biologist shall provide an analysis to the City of Rancho Cucamonga as to whether the loss of occupied habitat would "have a substantial adverse effect" on the overall species to determine whether mitigation is warranted. If mitigation is necessary to offset a potentially significant impact, then mitigation of no less than 2:1 (replacement to impact) shall be required. Additionally, the Project Applicant/Developer shall prepare and implement a set of avoidance and minimization measures aimed at protecting special -status small mammals from project -related impacts. The proposed avoidance and minimization measures shall be provided to CDFW for review and approval no fewer than 30 days prior to the initiation of project activities. If the San Bernardino kangaroo rat is identified on the site, take authorization must be obtained from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), and so the Project Applicant/Developer shall consult with the USFWS. The USFWS shall identify measures to be taken to avoid or minimize adverse Project effects to these species and their habitat. Such measures may include, but are not limited to, the following: (1) avoidance of the occupied habitat, (2) enhancement of habitat, or (3) conservation of off -site suitable habitat, or any other measures as determined by USFWS. At present the SBKR is designated as a Candidate Endangered species under the California Endangered Species Act (CESA). If the SBKR is still protected under CESA at the time of construction, then in addition to take authorization from USFWS, an Incidental Take Permit (ITP) will be required from CDFW pursuant to Fish and Game Code Section 2080.1. If applicable, the Project Applicant/Developer will coordinate with CDFW to obtain an ITP, including to ensure that the habitat mitigation determined through consultation with USFWS will also satisfy CDFW. 11310-4 Non -listed Special -Status Reptiles. If construction will be performed at a time of year when reptiles are active at the Project area, i.e. Spring or Summer, a qualified biologist shall visually survey the Project area prior to construction to identify any feature/habitats suitable to support special -status reptiles (i.e., burrows, dens, cavities, debris, dead vegetation, rocks, loose soil, leaf litter, etc.). Where an identifiable feature is present, the qualified biologist shall mark the potentially occupied feature for avoidance. If avoidance is infeasible, the qualified biologist shall carefully dismantle the feature and allow any individuals discovered to move out of harm's way, if such efforts are determined to be feasible and reasonable by the biologist. Level of Significance after Mitigation: Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. b) Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? The Project site is vacant but highly disturbed with low growth of mostly nonnative vegetation. Based on the results of database searches and field surveys conducted as part of the Biological PASTR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20)> 4-29 179 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 Technical Report, the Project site does not support any special -status or sensitive riparian habitat as identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the CDFW or USFWS. Therefore, no significant impacts related to riparian habitat or other sensitive natural communities identified in a local or regional plan would result from Project implementation, and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: No Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. c) Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? The State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) is currently proposing a State Wetland Definition and Procedures for Discharges of Dredged or Fill Material to Waters of the State (State Wetlands Procedures, formerly known as the State Wetland and Riparian Area Protection Policy) (SWRCB 2019). The State Wetlands Procedures consist of four main components: (1) a wetland definition; (2) a framework for determining if a feature that meets the wetland definition is a water of the State; (3) wetland delineation procedures; and (4) procedures for the submittal, review, and approval of applications for Water Quality Certifications and Waste Discharge Requirements (WDRs) for dredge or fill activities. In an effort to catalog the State's water resources, the California Aquatic Resources Inventory (CART) is being developed and includes a dataset of resources cataloged in the CARI that show there are no aquatic resources on the Project site or immediate vicinity.16 According to the USFWS National Wetlands Inventory, East Etiwanda Creek is approximately 400 ft east of the Project site across East Avenue. Additionally, a drainage basin lies approximately 530 ft west of the Project boundary.17 However, due to the distance from the proposed area of development to these aquatic resources, development of the Project site is unlikely to impact these nearby aquatic resources. The Project site is vacant but highly disturbed with low growth of mostly nonnative vegetation. According to the Biological Technical Report and the National Wetlands Inventory, the Project site does not contain federally protected wetlands,18 as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, nor does it contain State -protected wetlands, as defined by the State Wetlands Procedures. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would not have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands. Significance Determination: No Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. 16 California Aquatic Resources Inventory. 2016. EcoAtlas: Existing Aquatic Resources. Website: https://www.ecoatlas.org/regions/ecoregion/south-coast (accessed June 13, 2019). 17 United States Fish and Wildlife Service. 2020. National Wetlands Inventory. Webviewer: https://www.fws.gov/wetlands/data/Mapper.html 18 Ibid. 4-30 PASTR1901 - Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <<06/18/20» 180 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J d) Would the project interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? The Project site is currently undeveloped but is located in an urban area. Because urban development surrounds the site, the proposed Project site does not function as a wildlife movement corridor. Species that are found on the site either fly onto the site or are able to navigate on the ground through long stretches of urban development. Therefore, the Project site does not contain any native resident or migratory fish, wildlife species, or wildlife corridors. In addition, no portion of the Project site or the immediately surrounding areas contains an open body of water that serves as a natural habitat in which fish could exist. The property contains vegetation (trees, shrubs, and herbaceous vegetation) with the potential to support nesting birds. The presence of vegetation with the potential to support nesting birds may represent a seasonal constraint to development if not removed at the appropriate time of the year. The proposed Project has the potential to impact active bird nests if vegetation and trees are removed during the nesting season. Nesting birds are protected under the federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) (United States Code Title 33, Section 703 et seq.; see also Code of Federal Regulations Title 50, Part 10) and Section 3503 of the California Department of Fish and Game Code. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would be subject to the provisions of the MBTA, which prohibits disturbing or destroying active nests. Project implementation must be accomplished in a manner that avoids impacts to active nests during the breeding season. Therefore, if Project construction occurs between February 1 and September 15, a qualified biologist shall conduct a nesting bird survey no more than 3 days prior to ground- and/or vegetation -disturbing activities to confirm the absence of nesting birds. As documented in RCM-1310-1, avoidance of impacts can be accomplished through a variety of means, including establishing suitable buffers around any active nests. RCM-1310-1 would ensure that impacts to nesting birds would be less than significant. Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Regulatory Compliance Measures and Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required, but the proposed Project would be required to adhere to the MBTA and applicable sections of California Fish and Game Code, as detailed in RCM-1310-1. RCM-1310-1 Migratory Bird Treaty Act and Fish and Game Code Section 3503. In the event that construction, vegetation clearing, or grading activities (including disking and demolition) should occur between February 1 and September 15, the Project Applicant/Developer (or its contractor) shall retain a qualified biologist (i.e., a professional biologist who is familiar with local birds and their nesting behaviors) to conduct a nesting bird survey no more than 3 days prior to commencement of construction activities. The nesting survey shall include the Project site and areas immediately adjacent to the site that could potentially be affected by Project - related construction activities, such as noise, human activity, and dust, etc. If active nesting of birds is observed within 100 feet (ft) of the designated construction area prior to construction, the biologist shall establish suitable buffers around the active nests (e.g., as much as 500 ft for raptors and 300 ft for nonraptors [subject to the PASTR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20)> 4-31 181 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 recommendations of the qualified biologist]), and the buffer areas shall be avoided until the nests are no longer occupied and the juvenile birds can survive independently from the nests. Prior to commencement of grading activities, the Director of the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department, or designee, shall verify that all Project grading and construction plans include specific documentation regarding the requirements stated above, that pre -construction surveys have been completed and the results reviewed by staff, and that the appropriate buffers (if needed) are noted on the plans and established in the field with orange snow fencing. e) Would the project conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? Section 17.16.080 of the City's Municipal Code requires that a tree removal permit be obtained for the removal of any tree considered to be a heritage tree. A heritage tree is defined as any tree that meets at least one of the following criteria: all eucalyptus windrows; any tree in excess of 30 ft tall and having a single trunk DBH of 20 inches or more; multi -trunk trees having a total DBH of 30 inches or more; a stand of trees, each of which depends on the others for survival; or any other tree as may be deemed historically or culturally significant by the City Planning Director because of its age, size, condition, location, or aesthetic qualities. According to the Arborist Survey Report (LSA, November 2017; Appendix C), 33 trees identified on site would be removed as part of the proposed Project. Based on the results of the on -site tree inventory survey conducted for the Project, each of the assessed trees meet the City's requirements to be considered a heritage tree, either because the subject tree is part of a eucalyptus windrow or because it meets the size criteria of being both in excess of 30 ft tall and having a single trunk DBH of 20 inches or more, or having a combined multi -trunk DBH of 30 inches or more. As required by RCM-1310-2, the Applicant would obtain tree removal permits prior to the removal of any on -site trees and the issuance of any grading permits. With implementation of RCM-1310-2, potentially significant impacts related to tree removal would be less than significant. No mitigation would be required. Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Regulatory Compliance Measure: No mitigation is required, but the proposed Project would be required to comply with the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code as described in RCM-1310-2. RCM-11310-2 Tree Replacement. Prior to issuance of grading permits or the removal of any on - site trees, the City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) Planning Department Director, or designee, shall verify that the Project Applicant has obtained tree removal permits in accordance with the provisions outlined in Section 17.16.080 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. As outlined in Section 17.16.080 of the City's Municipal Code, a tree removal permit shall by required for the removal of all heritage trees on private properties within Rancho Cucamonga, unless expressly stated in Section 17.16.080 (Exceptions). 4-32 PASTR1901 - Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <<06/18/20» 182 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION DUNE 2020 W ESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J f) Would the project conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? The Project site is currently vacant and undeveloped, but it is located in an urban area. The Project site is not located in or adjacent to an existing or proposed Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP), Natural Community Conservation Plan (NCCP), or other approved local, regional, or State HCP. The City is a participant in the Draft Etiwanda Heights Neighborhood & Conservation Plan, which, among other goals, seeks to conserve as much of the Planning Area as rural open space and habitat conservation as feasible.19 However, the Project site is not within the Etiwanda Heights Conservation Plan area. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would not conflict with the provisions of an adopted HCP, NCCP, or other approved local, regional, or State HCP, and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: No Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. 19 City of Rancho Cucamonga. 2019. Etiwanda Heights Neighborhood & Conservation Plan. PASTR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20)> 4-33 183 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 4.5 CULTURAL RESOURCES Less than Potentially Significant with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a ❑ ❑ ❑ historical resource pursuant to §15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an ❑ ® ❑ ❑ archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5? c) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside ❑ ❑ ® ❑ of formal cemeteries? Discussion The following section is based on the Cultural Resources Assessment Report, Westbury, Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino, California (Cultural Resources Assessment) (LSA, January 2018) and the Paleontological Analysis of the Westbury Project, Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California (Paleontological Resources Assessment) (LSA, January 2018). These reports are included in Appendices D and E, respectively. Impact Analysis a) Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource pursuant to §15064.5? CEQA defines a "historical resource" as a resource that meets one more of the following criteria: (1) listed in, or determined eligible for listing in, the California Register of Historical Resources (California Register); (2) listed in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code (PRC) Section 5020.1(k); (3) identified as significant in a historical resource survey meeting the requirements of PRC Section 5024.1(g); or (4) determined to be a historical resource by a project's Lead Agency (PRC Section 21084.1 and State CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5[a]). The California Register defines a "historical resource" as a resource that meets one or more of the following criteria: 1. Associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns or local or regional history of the cultural heritage of California or the United States; 2. Associated with the lives of persons important to local, California, or national history; 3. Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction or represents the work of a master or possesses high artistic values; or 4. Has yielded, or has the potential to yield, information important to the prehistory or history of the local area, California, or the nation. 4-34 PASTR1901 - Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <<06/18/20» 184 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J As detailed in the Cultural Resources Assessment (LSA, January 2018; Appendix D), a records search was conducted on November 13, 2017, to identify historic resources in the Project area. The records search was conducted by Isabela Kott at the South Central Coastal Information Center (SCCIC) of the California Historical Resources Information System and California State University, Fullerton. The SCCIC houses the pertinent archaeological and historic site and survey information necessary to determine whether cultural resources are known to exist within the Project area. In addition, the California Points of Historical Interest, California Historical Landmarks, the California Register, the National Register of Historic Places (National Register), and the California State Historic Properties Directory listings were reviewed. The results of the records search indicate that three cultural studies have been conducted within portions of the Project area. The two closest resources to the Project site include one historic single- family residence and a historic road. Both historic resources are within 0.0125 mi of the site but are not located on the property. As such, there are no historical resources (as defined in §15065.5 of the State CEQA Guidelines) located on the Project site. Therefore, the proposed Project would not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource, and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: No Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. b) Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5? As previously stated, the Cultural Resources Assessment included a records search at the SCCIC to identify previously recorded historic and prehistoric resources in the Project area and previously completed cultural resources surveys and excavations within 1 mi of the Project site. The results of the records search indicated that three cultural resource surveys have been conducted within the Project area, with an additional 49 studies conducted outside the 1 mi radius. Previous cultural work in the area has resulted in 24 resources being recorded within 1 mi of the Project site; however, none of these resources are within the Project site boundaries. As previously stated, the two closest resources include a historic single-family residence and a historic road. In addition to a records search, an archaeological pedestrian survey of the entire Project site was conducted by LSA archaeologist Gini Austerman on November 26, 2017. The purpose of the field survey was to locate any known cultural resources, if present, and to determine their current status, update documentation, and identify any unrecorded cultural resources visible on the surface of the Project site. During the pedestrian survey, a scattering of modern trash was noted throughout the Project site and a row of nonnative windrow trees was noted along the southern and eastern boundaries. No evidence of previous residence buildings was noted. Although no cultural resources were identified on the site by the records search or during the field survey, historic maps indicated the Project area was developed as early as the 1890s and near the Project site prior to 1954. As such, archaeological monitoring during construction activities is required due to the possibility of disturbing unknown archaeological resources during ground- PASTR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20)> 4-35 185 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION JUNE 2020 disturbing activities (Mitigation Measure CUL-1). If cultural resources are encountered during ground -disturbing work, construction activities in the area of the find will stop and the resource will be evaluated for significance. Implementation of Mitigation Measure CUL-1 would reduce the impact of the proposed Project on the significance of archaeological resources to a less than significant level. Significance Determination: Potentially Significant Impact. Mitigation Measure: CUL-1 Archaeological Monitoring. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the Applicant shall provide a letter to the Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department, or designee, from a qualified archaeologist (who meets Secretary of the Interior Standards) who has been retained to provide archaeological monitoring during ground -disturbing Project activities. The archaeologist shall attend the pre - grading meeting to establish procedures for an archaeological monitoring program. Those procedures shall include provisions for temporarily halting or redirecting work to permit sampling, identification, and evaluation of resources deemed by the archaeologist to potentially be historical resources or unique archaeological resources. These procedures shall be submitted to, reviewed by, and approved by the Director of Planning, or designee, prior to issuance of the grading permit and prior to any surface disturbance on the Project site. The archaeological monitor will be present and on site during all ground -disturbing activities. Should any cultural resources be discovered, no further grading shall occur in the immediate vicinity of the discovery (precise area to be determined by the archaeologist in the field, but shall be at least 50 feet) until the Director of Planning, or designee, is satisfied that the appropriate treatment of the resource has occurred. Any finds dating to the pre - contact period shall be also assessed by a representative from the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians and from the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation to determine whether the find constitutes a "tribal cultural resource" as defined in PRC Section 21074 (as detailed in TRC-1). If significant pre -contact cultural resources, as defined by CEQA, are discovered and avoidance cannot be ensured, the archaeologist shall develop a Monitoring and Treatment Plan, the drafts of which shall be provided to the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians and the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation for review and comment, as detailed in TRC-1. An archaeological monitoring report shall be prepared following completion of archaeological monitoring, and a copy of the report shall be submitted to the South Central Coastal Information Center (SCCIC). Level of Significance after Mitigation: Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. c) Would the project disturb any humans remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? There are no known human remains interred on the Project site. While the potential to encounter human remains is low, buried and undiscovered human remains may be present below the ground 4-36 PASTR1901 - Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <<06/18/20» 186 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J surface. Disturbing human remains could violate the State's Health and Safety Code as well as destroy the resource. In the unlikely event that human remains are encountered during ground - disturbing activities, the proper authorities would be notified in compliance with State Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 and PRC Section 5097.98, which require that no further disturbance occur in the event of a discovery or recognition of any human remains on site and that the County Coroner be notified immediately. The contractor, Developer, and County Coroner are required to comply with the provisions of California Code of Regulations (CCR) Section 15064.5(e), PRC Section 5097.98, and Section 7050.5 of the State's Health and Safety Code. Compliance with these provisions (specified in RCM-CUL-1), would ensure that any potential impacts to unknown buried human remains would be less than significant by ensuring appropriate examination, treatment, and protection of human remains as required by State law. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Regulatory Compliance Measures and Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. However, RCM-CUL-1 is a standard condition based on State law related to the discovery of human remains. This Regulatory Compliance Measure is applicable to the proposed Project and shall be incorporated to ensure that the Project has minimal impacts related to unknown buried human remains. RCM-CUL-1 Human Remains. In the event that human remains are encountered on the Project site, work within 50 feet of the discovery shall be redirected and the County Coroner notified immediately, consistent with the requirements of California Code of Regulations (CCR) Section 15064.5(e). State Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 states that no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code (PRC) Section 5097.98. If the remains are determined to be Native American, the County Coroner shall notify the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), which shall determine and notify a Most Likely Descendant (MILD). With the permission of the property owner, the MLD may inspect the site of the discovery. The MLD shall complete the inspection and make recommendations or preferences for treatment within 48 hours of being granted acess to the site. The MLD recommendations may include scientific removal and nondestructive analysis of human remains and items associated with Native American burials, preservation of Native American human remains and associated items in place, relinquishment of Native American human remains and associated items to the descendants for treatment, or any other culturally appropriate treatment. Consistent with CCR Section 15064.5(d), if the remains are determined to be Native American and an MLD is notified, the City shall consult with the MLD as identified by the NAHC to develop an agreement for treatment and disposition of the remains. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department, or designee, shall verify that all grading plans specify the requirements of CCR Section 15064.5(e), State Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5, and PRC Section 5097.98, as stated above. PASTR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20)> 4-37 187 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 4.6 ENERGY Less than Potentially Significant with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Would the project: a) Result in a potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ energy resources during project construction or operation? b) Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable ❑ ❑ ® ❑ energy or energy efficiency? Discussion The proposed Project would increase the demand for electricity, natural gas, and gasoline. The discussion and analysis provided below are based on data included in the CalEEMod output, which is included in Appendix A of the Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Analysis (provided in Appendix A of this report). Impact Analysis a) Would the project result in a potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources during project construction or operation? Construction -Period Energy Use. The anticipated construction schedule assumes that the proposed Project would be built over approximately 18 months. The proposed Project would require site preparation, grading, building construction, paving, and architectural coating activities during construction. Construction of the proposed Project would require energy for the manufacture and transportation of construction materials, preparation of the site for grading activities, and construction. Petroleum fuels (e.g., diesel and gasoline) would be the primary sources of energy for these activities. Based on the proposed Project's anticipated construction schedule and equipment, the proposed Project would consume 54,678 gallons of diesel fuel.20 Based on fuel consumption obtained from EMFAC2017, approximately 290.2 million gallons of diesel fuel would be consumed from vehicle trips in San Bernardino County in 2020. As such, construction of the proposed Project would increase the annual diesel fuel use in San Bernardino County by approximately 0.02 percent. As such, Project construction would have a negligible effect on local and regional energy supplies. Furthermore, construction activities are not anticipated to result in an inefficient use of energy, as gasoline and diesel fuel would be supplied by construction contractors who would conserve the use of their supplies to minimize their costs on the Project. Energy usage on the Project site during 20 California Air Resources Board, 2020. MSEI - Documentation - Off -Road - Diesel Equipment. Website: https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/our-work/programs/mobile-source-emissions-inventory/road- documentation/msei-documentation-road (accessed March 2020). 4-38 PASTR1901 - Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <<06/18/20» 188 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J construction would be temporary in nature and would be relatively small in comparison to the State's available energy sources. Therefore, construction energy impacts would be less than significant. Operational Energy Use. Energy consumed by the proposed Project would be associated with natural gas use, electricity consumption, and fuel used for vehicle trips associated with the Project. Energy and natural gas consumption was estimated for the Project using default energy intensities by building type in CaIEEMod. In addition, as discussed in Section 4.3, Air Quality, the proposed Project would comply with the 2019 California Building Standards Code (California Code of Regulations, Title 24) , including the major energy efficiency measures that are now required in all homes. The Project will incorporate the following in building plans as a project design feature: • Solar photovoltaic systems shall be installed. • Low -emission water heaters shall be used. Solar water heaters are encouraged. • Exterior windows shall utilize window treatments for efficient energy conservation. The 2019 Title 24 standards also encourage demand responsive technologies including battery storage and heat pump water heaters and building thermal envelope improvements through high performance attics, walls and windows to improve comfort and energy savings. The proposed Project's compliance with 2019 Title 24 standards was accounted for in CalEEMod. Electricity and natural gas usage estimates associated with the proposed Project are shown in Table 4.6.A. Table 4.6.A: Estimated Annual Energy Use of the Proposed Project Land Use Electricity Use (kWh per year) Natural Gas Use (therms per year) Gasoline (gallons per year) Apartments —Low -Rise 318,347 10,204 148,460 General Office Building' 5,819 21 2,155 Strip Mall 10,061 18 5,190 Parking Lot 35,000 0 0 Other Non -Asphalt Surfaces 0 0 0 Total 369,227 10,243 155,805 Source: LSA (March 2020). 'The energy usage for general office buildings was used to calculate the energy usage for the four commercial -ready units. kWh = kilowatt-hour The proposed Project would also result in energy usage associated with gasoline to fuel Project - related trips. Based on the CaIEEMod analysis, the proposed Project would result in 3,427,738 vehicle miles traveled (VMT) per year. The average fuel economy for light -duty vehicles (autos, pickups, vans, and SUVs) in the United States has steadily increased from about 14.9 miles per gallon (mpg) in 1980 to 22.0 mpg in 2015.21 Therefore, using the EPA fuel economy estimates for 2015, the 21 U.S. Department of Transportation. "Table 4-23: Average Fuel Efficiency of U.S. Light Duty Vehicles." Website: https://www.bts.gov/archive/publications/national_transportation_statistics/table_04_23/ (accessed June 2019). P:\STR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20)> 4-39 189 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 proposed Project would result in the consumption of approximately 155,805 gallons of gasoline per year. Table 4.6.A shows the estimated potential increased electricity, natural gas, and gasoline demand associated with the proposed Project. As shown in Table 4.6.A, the estimated potential increased electricity demand associated with the proposed Project is 369,227 kilowatt-hours (kWh) per year. In 2018, California consumed approximately 284,436 gigawatt-hours (GWh) (284,436,261,624 kWh).22 Of this total, San Bernardino County consumed 15,634 GWh (15,633,655,242 kWh).23 Therefore, electricity demand associated with the proposed Project would be less than 0.01 percent of San Bernardino County's total electricity demand. In addition, as shown in Table 4.6.A, the estimated potential increased natural gas demand associated with the proposed Project is 10,243 therms per year. In 2018, California consumed approximately 12,666 million therms or 12,666,389,562 therms, while San Bernardino County consumed approximately 500 million therms or 500,082,474 therms.24 Therefore, natural gas demand associated with the proposed Project would be less than 0.01 percent of San Bernardino County's total natural gas demand. The proposed Project would also result in energy usage associated with gasoline to fuel Project - related trips. As shown above in Table 4.6.A, vehicle trips associated with the proposed Project would consume approximately 155,804 gallons of gasoline per year. In 2015, vehicles in California consumed approximately 15.1 billion gallons of gasoline.25 Therefore, gasoline demand generated by vehicle trips associated with the proposed Project would be a minimal fraction of gasoline and diesel fuel consumption in California. The proposed Project would be constructed to 2019 Title 24 standards, which would help to reduce energy and natural gas consumption. Therefore, the proposed Project would not result in the wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of fuel or energy and would incorporate renewable energy or energy efficiency measures into building design, equipment use, and transportation. Construction and operation -period impacts related to consumption of energy resources would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. 22 California Energy Commission. 2018. Energy Consumption Data Management Service. Electricity Consumption by County. Website: http://www.ecdms.energy.ca.gov/elecbycounty.aspx (accessed March 2020). 23 Ibid. 24 Ibid. 25 California Energy Commission. 2017. California Gasoline Data, Facts, and Statistics. Website: http://www.energy.ca.gov/almanac/transportation_data/gasoline/ (accessed June 2019). 4-40 PASTR1901 - Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <<06/18/20» 190 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J b) Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency? In 2002, the State Legislature passed Senate Bill (SB) 1389, which required the California Energy Commission (CEC) to develop an integrated energy plan every 2 years for electricity, natural gas, and transportation fuels, for the California Energy Policy Report. The plan calls for the State to assist in the transformation of the transportation system to improve air quality, reduce congestion, and increase the efficient use of fuel supplies with the least environmental and energy costs. To further this policy, the plan identifies a number of strategies, including assistance to public agencies and fleet operators in implementing incentive programs for zero -emission vehicles and their infrastructure needs, and encouragement of urban designs that reduce VMT and accommodate pedestrian and bicycle access. The CEC recently adopted the 2019 Integrated Energy Policy Report.26 The 2019 Integrated Energy Policy Report provides the results of the CEC's assessments of a variety of energy issues facing California. Many of these issues will require action if the State is to meet its climate, energy, air quality, and other environmental goals while maintaining energy reliability and controlling costs. The 2019 Integrated Energy Policy Report covers a broad range of topics, including implementation of SB 350, integrated resource planning, distributed energy resources, transportation electrification, solutions to increase resiliency in the electricity sector, energy efficiency, transportation electrification, barriers faced by disadvantaged communities, demand response, transmission and landscape -scale planning, the California Energy Demand Preliminary Forecast, the preliminary transportation energy demand forecast, renewable gas (in response to SB 1383), updates on Southern California electricity reliability, the natural gas outlook, and climate adaptation and resiliency. The City of Rancho Cucamonga relies on the State integrated energy plan and does not have its own local plan to address renewable energy or energy efficiency. As indicated above, energy usage on the Project site during construction would be temporary in nature. In addition, energy usage associated with operation of the proposed Project would be relatively small in comparison to the State's available energy sources, and energy impacts would be negligible at the regional level. Because California's energy conservation planning actions are conducted at a regional level, and because the Project's total impact on regional energy supplies would be minor, the proposed Project would not conflict with or obstruct California's energy conservation plans as described in the CEC's 2019 Integrated Energy Policy Report. As shown above, the proposed Project would avoid the inefficient, wasteful, and unnecessary consumption of energy and would not result in any irreversible or irretrievable commitments of energy. Potential impacts related to the wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources during Project construction or operation would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. 26 California Energy Commission, 2019. 2019 Integrated Energy Policy Report. California Energy Commission. Docket # 19-IEPR-01. PASTR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20)> 4-41 191 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 4.7 GEOLOGY AND SOILS Less than Potentially Significant with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Would the project: a) Directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based ❑ ❑ ❑ on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii. Strong seismic ground shaking? ❑ ® ❑ ❑ iii. Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction? ❑ ❑ ❑ iv. Landslides? ❑ ❑ ® ❑ b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ potentially result in on- or off -site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial direct ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ or indirect risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems ❑ ❑ ❑ where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? f) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological ® ❑ ❑ ❑ resource or site or uniaue eeoloeic feature? Discussion The following section is based on the Geotechnical Investigation, Proposed Residential Development, West of East Avenue and Approximately 500 Feet North of Foothill Boulevard, APN 1100-191-04-000, City of Rancho Cucamonga, California (Geotechnical Investigation) (Leighton and Associates, Inc., October 2016). This report is included in Appendix F. Impact Analysis a) Would the project directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42? As with all of Southern California, the Project site is subject to strong ground motion resulting from earthquakes on nearby faults. There are, however, no known faults crossing the Project site. 4-42 PASTR1901 - Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <<06/18/20» 192 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J According to the Geotechnical Investigation, the closest mapped active faults is the Cucamonga Fault approximately 4.5 mi to the north. The San Bernardino section of the San Jacinto Fault Zone is also approximately 6.8 mi northeast of the site. The Project site is not within an Alquist-Priolo Fault Hazard Zone. As such, the chance for surface fault rupture, during or as a consequence, of seismic activity is considered unlikely. Therefore, the proposed Project would not expose people or structures to substantial adverse effects involving the rupture of a known earthquake fault as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone Map, and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: No Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. a) Would the project directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: ii. Strong seismic ground shaking? The Project site, like all of Southern California, is in an active seismic region. Ground shaking resulting from earthquakes associated with both nearby and more distant faults is likely to occur. The Project site is located in the north -central portion of the Chino Basin, in the northern area of the Peninsular Ranges Geomorphic Province. As previously stated, the Project site is located approximately 4.5 mi south of the Cucamonga Fault Zone and 6.8 mi southwest of the San Bernardino section of the San Jacinto Fault Zone. As discussed in Response 4.6(a)(i,) the Project site is not located within an Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone. In addition to the Cucamonga Fault Zone and the San Bernardino section of the San Jacinto Fault Zone, there are five active faults within the region: (1) an un-named fault near Fontana; (2) the Red -Hill Etiwanda Avenue Fault; (3) the Sierra Madre Fault Zone; (4) the San Jose Fault; and (5) the Central Avenue Fault, which are 3.5, 3.6, 4.0, 13.9, and 14.1 mi from the Project site, respectively.27 During an earthquake along these faults or others, seismically induced ground shaking would be expected to occur. The severity of the shaking would be influenced by the distance of the site from the seismic source, the soil conditions, and the depth to groundwater. Ground shaking generated by fault movement is considered a potentially significant impact that may affect the proposed Project. Mitigation Measure GEO-1 requires that the Project Applicant comply with the recommendations of the Geotechnical Investigation, the most current California Building Code (CBC), and the City Building Code, which stipulates appropriate seismic design provisions that shall be implemented with Project design and construction. With the implementation of Mitigation Measure GEO-1, potential Project impacts related to seismic ground shaking would be reduced to a less than significant level. 27 United States Geological Survey. U.S. Quaternary Faults Webviewer. Website: https://usgs.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.htmI?id=5a6038b3a1684561a9b0aadf88412fcf (accessed March 9, 2020). PASTR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20)> 4-43 193 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA Significance Determination: Potentially Significant Impact. Mitigation Measure: INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION JUNE 2020 GEO-1 Compliance with the Recommendations in the Geotechnical Study. All grading operations and construction shall be conducted in conformance with all of the recommendations included in the geotechnical document prepared by Leighton and Associates, Inc., titled Geotechnical Investigation, Proposed Residential Development, West of East Avenue and Approximately 500 Feet North of Foothill Boulevard, APN 1100-191-04-000, City of Rancho Cucamonga (October 5, 2016). Recommendations found in the geotechnical document address topics including, but not limited to: • General earthwork and grading, including site preparations, over -excavation and re -compaction, fill placement and compaction, importing of fill soil, shrinkage and subsidence, rippability, and oversized material; • Foundations, including minimum embedment and width, allowable bearing, lateral load resistance, increase in bearing and friction, and settlement estimates; • Slabs -on -grade, including subgrade moisture conditioning, concrete and structural design thickness, and slab underlayment for moisture vapor retarding; • Seismic design parameters; • Retaining walls; • Pavement design; and • Infiltration testing. Additional site grading, foundation, and utility plans shall be reviewed by the Project Geotechnical Consultant prior to construction to check for conformance with all of the recommendations of the Geotechnical Investigation (Leighton 2016). Grading plan review shall also be conducted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) City Engineer, or designee, prior to the start of grading to verify that requirements developed during the preparation of geotechnical documents have been appropriately incorporated into the Project plans. Design, grading, and construction shall be performed in accordance with the requirements of the City Building Code and the California Building Code (CBC) applicable at the time of grading, as well as the recommendations of the Project Geotechnical Consultant as summarized in the final Geotechnical Report subject to review by the City Engineer, or designee, prior to the start of grading activities. The final Geotechnical Report shall present the results of observation and testing done during grading activities. Level of Significance after Mitigation: Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. 4-44 PASTR1901 - Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <<06/18/20» 194 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J a) Would the project directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: iii. Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction? Liquefaction commonly occurs when three conditions are present simultaneously: (1) high groundwater; (2) relatively loose, cohesion -lacking (sandy) soil; and (3) earthquake -generated seismic waves. Liquefaction effects can manifest in several ways, including (1) loss of bearing, (2) lateral spread, (3) dynamic settlement, and (4) flow failures. According to the Geology and Soils Element (2010c) of the City's General Plan Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR), only three small areas in the southwestern portion of Rancho Cucamonga have perched water conditions that could be subject to liquefaction. One of these areas, south of the Base Line Road and Hellman Road intersection in the southwestern portion of Rancho Cucamonga, is approximately 5.1 mi from the Project site. However, regional mapping indicates that much of the sediment in this area may be too dense to liquefy.28 The liquefaction susceptibility of the on -site subsurface soils was evaluated as part of the Geotechnical Investigation prepared for the proposed Project. The Geotechnical Investigation used a standard penetration test (SPT) to analyze the liquefaction potential on the Project site. SPT is an in - situ dynamic penetration test designed to provide information on the geotechnical engineering properties of soil. Based on this testing, current groundwater levels were identified deeper than 51.5 feet below ground surface (bgs). As such, the Geotechnical Investigation determined that the potential for liquefaction at the site was very low. Therefore, there would be no impact related to liquefaction, and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: No Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. a) Would the project directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: iv. Landslides? Seismically induced landslides and other slope failures are common occurrences during or soon after earthquakes in areas with significant ground slopes. According to the Geology and Soils Element (2010c) of the City's General Plan, potential landslides or slope failure are expected in areas with steep slopes at the northwestern corner of Rancho Cucamonga. Steep slopes are found along Cucamonga Creek and at the foothills north of the city. According to the Geotechnical Investigation, the site is relatively flat and lacks significant slopes. As such, the site is not considered susceptible to static slope instability or seismically induced 28 City of Rancho Cucamonga. 2010c. General Plan EIR. Chapter 4.7: Geology and Soils. PASTR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20)> 4-45 195 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 landslides. Therefore, the potential for impacts related to seismically induced landslides is less than significant, and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. b) Would the project result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? During construction of the proposed Project, soil would be exposed and there would be increased potential for soil erosion and siltation compared to existing conditions. During storm events, erosion and siltation could occur at an accelerated rate. The increased erosion potential could result in short-term water quality impacts as discussed in Section 4.10, Hydrology and Water Quality. As discussed in further detail in Section 4.10, the proposed Project would increase impervious surface area on the Project site to approximately 5 ac, which would increase the volume and velocity of stormwater runoff from the Project site. The remaining portion of the site would primarily be landscaping, which would minimize on -site erosion and siltation. As the Project site is relatively flat, soil erosion can be controlled via implementation of standard erosion control practices. Additionally, impervious surface areas associated with development of the Project site are not prone to erosion or siltation. Erosion and siltation would be minimal in the proposed landscaped areas. In the undeveloped areas, erosion and siltation would be similar to the existing condition. As discussed in RCM-WQ-1 in Section 4.10, the proposed Project would comply with the Construction General Permit, which requires preparation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and implementation of construction BMPs to reduce impacts to water quality during construction, including impacts associated with soil erosion and siltation. Furthermore, the exposure of soils during construction would be short-term and subject to requirements established by the NPDES. With incorporation of construction BMPs as required by RCM-WQ-1, impacts related to erosion during construction would be reduced to a less than significant level. Therefore, impacts related to erosion and loss of topsoil would be less than significant and no mitigation would be required. Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Regulatory Compliance Measures: No mitigation is required; refer to RCM-WQ-1. c) Would the project be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off -site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? Landslides and other forms of mass wasting, including mudflows, debris flows, and soil slips, occur as soil moves downslope under the influence of gravity. Landslides are frequently triggered by intense rainfall or seismic shaking. As described in Response 4.6(a)(iv), above, the Project site and 4-46 PASTR1901 - Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <<06/18/20» 196 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J surrounding area lack natural slopes and are underlain by materials that are stable under static conditions; there is a very low potential for landsliding to occur from a seismic event. Moreover, the Project site is not within a State -designated hazard zone for seismically induced landslides.29 Although no indications of landslide activity or gross slope instability were observed at the Project site during the Geotechnical Investigation, grading activities during construction would produce temporary construction slopes in some areas. Unstable cut -and -fill slopes could create significant short-term and long-term hazards on and off site. All excavations must be performed in accordance with the City and State Building Codes and the State Division of Occupational Safety and Health requirements. Utility trenches would be supported either by layback excavations or shoring, in accordance with Occupational Safety and Health Administration standards. Temporary backcuts, if required during removal of unsuitable soils, would be reviewed and approved by the Project Geotechnical Consultant. With implementation of the recommendations in the Geotechnical Investigation (as required in Mitigation Measure GEO-1), potential impacts related to slope instability would be reduced below a level of significance. Subsidence, the sinking of the land surface due to oil, gas, and water production, causes loss of pore pressures as the weight of the overburden compacts the underlying sediments. No subsidence associated with fluid withdrawal is known to have occurred on or in the vicinity of the Project site, and no mitigation is required."' As stated above in Response 4.6(a)(iii), with groundwater encountered at depths greater than 50 ft bgs, there is a very low potential for liquefaction to occur due to a seismic event. Therefore, impacts related to unstable soils would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. Seismically induced settlement consists of dry dynamic settlement (above groundwater) and liquefaction -induced settlement (below groundwater). During a strong seismic event, seismically induced settlement can occur within loose to moderately dense sandy soil due to reduction in volume during, and shortly after, an earthquake event. Settlement caused by ground shaking is often non -uniformly distributed, which can result in differential settlement. According to the Geotechnical Investigation, on -site soils are susceptible to less than 1 inch of seismic settlement based on the maximum considered earthquake. Differential settlement due to seismic loading is assumed to be less than 0.5 inch over a horizontal distance of 40 ft based on the maximum considered earthquake. This level of seismic settlement does not present a significant risk for building collapse. Therefore, impacts related to seismically induced settlement would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: Potentially Significant Impact. Mitigation Measures: Refer to Mitigation Measure GEO-1. 29 California Department of Conservation. California Geological Survey. California Earthquake Hazards Zone Application. Earthquake Zones of Required Investigation Webviewer. Website: https://maps. conservation.ca.gov/cgs/EQZApp/app/ (Accessed March 9, 2020). 30 City of Rancho Cucamonga. 2010c. General Plan EIR. Chapter 4.7: Geology and Soils. PASTR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20)> 4-47 197 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 Level of Significance after Mitigation: Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. d) Would the project be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial direct or indirect risks to life or property? Expansive soils contain types of clay materials that occupy considerably more volume when they are wet or hydrated than when they are dry or dehydrated. Volume changes associated with changes in the moisture content of near -surface expansive soils can cause uplift or heave of the ground when they become wet or, less commonly, cause settlement when they dry out. Foundations constructed on these soils are subjected to large uplifting forces caused by the swelling. Based on laboratory testing in the Geotechnical Investigation, the soils on the Project site consist of granular materials (silty sand, coarse sand with gravel, and gravel with coarse sand). These soils are expected to have very low expansion potential. Therefore, impacts related to expansive soils would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. e) Would the project have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? The proposed Project does not include construction of septic tanks or connections to septic systems or alternative wastewater disposal systems. Therefore, the proposed Project would not result in impacts related to the soil's capability to adequately support the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems, and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: No Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. f) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? In order to determine impacts on paleontological resources, a Paleontological Resources Assessment (LSA; January 2018) (Appendix E) was conducted for the Project. As part of this analysis, a locality search of the paleontological records maintained at the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County (LACM) was conducted. The results of the literature review indicate that the Project site is located at northern end of the Peninsular Ranges Geomorphic Province, a 900 mi long northwest -southeast -trending structural block that extends from the Transverse Ranges in the north to the tip of Baja California in the south and includes the Los Angeles Basin. Geologic mapping of the Project area indicates that the Project site contains late Holocene (less than 4,200 years ago) Very Young Alluvial Fan Deposits to early Holocene to late Pleistocene (4,200 to 126,000 years ago) Young Alluvial Fan Deposits. Young Alluvial Fan Deposits consist of 4-48 PASTR1901 - Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <<06/18/20» 198 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J unconsolidated silt, sand, and gravel. Cobble- and boulder -size clasts are also present and are more abundant closer to hills and mountains. Although Holocene deposits can contain remains of plants and animals, only those from the middle to early Holocene (4,200 to 11,700 years ago) are considered scientifically important. No records of fossils from the middle to early Holocene in the Project area are known at this time. However, these Holocene deposits overlie older Pleistocene deposits, which have produced scientifically important fossils elsewhere in the region. There is a potential to find these types of fossils in the older sediments below the Very Young Alluvial Fan Deposits within the Young Alluvial Fan Deposits at depths of approximately 15 ft or more. As such, these deposits on the Project site have a low paleontological sensitivity above 15 ft and a high sensitivity below that mark. According to the locality search conducted by the LACM, there are no known fossil localities on the Project site. The locality search confirms that the Project site is underlain by deposits of younger Quaternary alluvium, which typically do not contain scientifically significant fossils in the uppermost layers but may produce important fossils at depth. The closest vertebrae locality in these older Quaternary deposits is LACM 7811, southwest of the Project site along Sumner Avenue north of Cloverdale Road. This locality produced a specimen of whipsnake at a depth of 9 to 11 ft bgs. The next closest locality is LACM 1207, further south of the Project site between Corona and Norco. That locality yielded a specimen of deer. Based on the findings of the fossil locality search, shallow excavations in the younger Quaternary alluvium are unlikely to recover any scientifically significant vertebrae remains. In addition, the potential for paleontological resources on the Project site is considered low because the site contains Very Young Alluvial Fan Deposits and Young Alluvial Fan Deposits (which have low paleontological sensitivity from the surface to a depth of 15 ft and high sensitivity below that mark). Ground -disturbing activities on the site are not anticipated to extend deeper than 9 ft. Therefore, it is unlikely that construction activities would result in impacts to paleontological resources. However, in the unlikely event that fossil remains are encountered on the site, a paleontologist shall be contacted to assess the discovery for scientific significance and make recommendations regarding the necessity to develop paleontological mitigation (including paleontological monitoring, collection, stabilization, and identification of observed resources; curation of resources into a museum repository; and preparation of a monitoring report of findings) as required by Mitigation Measure GEO-2. With implementation of Mitigation Measure GEO-2, impacts would be reduced to a less than significant level. At the completion of Project construction, the proposed Project would not result in further disturbance of native soils on the Project site. Therefore, operation of the proposed Project would not result in a substantial adverse change in the significance of a paleontological resource as defined in Section 15064.5 of the State CEQA Guidelines. Significance Determination: Potentially Significant Impact. PASTR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20)> 4-49 199 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 Mitigation Measure: GEO-2 Unknown Paleontological Resources. In the event that paleontological resources are encountered during Project excavation activities, work in the immediate area of the find shall be redirected and a paleontologist shall be contacted to assess the find for significance and make recommendations regarding further paleontological mitigation as needed. If Project plans change to include excavation below a depth of 15 feet (ft), a paleontologist shall be hired to develop a Paleontological Resources Impact Mitigation Program (PRIMP) for this Project. The PRIMP shall include the methods that will be used to protect paleontological resources that may exist within the Project site, as well as procedures for monitoring, fossil preparation and identification, curation into a repository, and preparation of a final report at the conclusion of grading. Excavation and grading activities in deposits with high paleontological sensitivity (Very Young Alluvial Fan Deposits and Young Alluvial Fan Deposits, Unit 1 below a depth of 15 ft) shall be monitored by a paleontological monitor following a PRIMP. No monitoring is required for excavation in deposits with low paleontological sensitivity (Very Young Alluvial Fan Deposits and Young Alluvial Fan Deposits, Unit 1 from the surface to a depth of 15 ft). Level of Significance after Mitigation: Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. 4-50 PASTR1901 - Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <<06/18/20» 200 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J 4.8 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS Less than Potentially Significant with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Would the project: a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ environment? b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Discussion The analysis in this section is based on the findings of the Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Analysis (LSA, March 2018). The Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Analysis is included in this IS/MND as Appendix A. Technical Background Greenhouse gases (GHGs) are present in the atmosphere naturally, released by natural sources, or formed from secondary reactions taking place in the atmosphere. The gases that are widely seen as the principal contributors to human -induced global climate change are carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N20), 03, and water vapor. Over the last 200 years, humans have caused substantial quantities of GHGs to be released into the atmosphere. These extra emissions are increasing GHG concentrations in the atmosphere and enhancing the natural greenhouse effect, which is causing global warming. While manmade GHGs include naturally occurring GHGs such as CO2, CH4, and N20, some gases, like hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6), are completely new to the atmosphere. For the purposes of planning and regulation, CCR Section 15364.5 defines GHGs to include, but not be limited to, CO2, CH4, N20, HFCs, PFCs, and SF6. Fossil fuel consumption in the transportation sector (e.g., on -road motor vehicles, off -highway mobile sources, and aircraft) is the single largest source of GHG emissions, accounting for approximately half of GHG emissions globally. Industrial and commercial sources are the second largest contributors of GHG emissions, making up about one-fourth of total emissions. The State CEQA Guidelines encourage Lead Agencies to consider many factors in conducting a CEQA analysis but preserve the discretion granted by CEQA to Lead Agencies in making their determinations. Section 15064.4 of the State CEQA Guidelines specifies how Lead Agencies may develop and employ thresholds of significance for GHG emissions. State CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.4 states: (b) The determination of the significance of greenhouse gas emissions calls for a careful judgment by the lead agency consistent with the provisions in section 15064. A lead agency should make a good -faith effort, based to the extent possible on scientific and PASTR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20)> 4-51 201 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 factual data, to describe, calculate, or estimate the amount of greenhouse gas emissions resulting from a project. A lead agency shall have discretion to determine, in the context of a particular project, whether to: (1) Use a model or methodology to quantify greenhouse gas emissions resulting from a project, and which model or methodology to use. The lead agency has discretion to select the model or methodology it considers most appropriate provided it supports its decision with substantial evidence. The lead agency should explain the limitations of the particular model or methodology selected for use; and/or (2) Rely on a qualitative analysis or performance based standards. (c) A lead agency should consider the following factors, among others, when assessing the significance of impacts from greenhouse gas emissions on the environment: (1) The extent to which the project may increase or reduce greenhouse gas emissions as compared to the existing environmental setting. (2) Whether the project emissions exceed a threshold of significance that the lead agency determines applies to the project. (3) The extent to which the project complies with regulations or requirements adopted to implement a statewide, regional, or local plan for the reduction or mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions. Such requirements must be adopted by the relevant public agency through a public review process and must reduce or mitigate the project's incremental contribution of greenhouse gas emissions. If there is substantial evidence that the possible effects of a particular project are still cumulatively considerable notwithstanding compliance with the adopted regulations or requirements, an EIR must be prepared for the project. State CEQA Guidelines Section 15064(b) provides that "the determination of whether a project may have a significant effect on the environment calls for careful judgment on the part of the public agency involved, based to the extent possible on scientific and factual data," and further states that an "ironclad definition of significant effect is not always possible because the significance of an activity may vary with the setting." The State CEQA Guidelines also clarify that the effects of GHG emissions are cumulative and should be analyzed in the context of the State CEQA Guidelines requirements for cumulative impact analysis. As such, currently neither the CEQA statutes, the OPR guidelines, nor the State CEQA Guidelines prescribe specific quantitative thresholds of significance or a particular methodology for performing an impact analysis. As with most environmental topics, significance criteria are left to the judgment and discretion of the Lead Agency. On December 5, 2008, the SCAQMD Governing Board adopted an Interim Quantitative GHG Significance Threshold where SCAQMD is the Lead Agency (e.g., stationary -source permit projects, 4-52 PASTR1901 - Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <<06/18/20» 202 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J rules, and plans) of 10,000 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (MT CO2e) per year for industrial projects and 3,000 MT CO2e per year for commercial/residential projects. For the purpose of this analysis, the concept of carbon dioxide equivalence (CO2e) is used to describe how much global warming a given type and amount of GHG may cause, using the functionally equivalent amount or concentration of CO2 as the reference. Individual GHGs have varying global warming potentials and atmospheric lifetimes. CO2e is a consistent methodology for comparing GHG emissions because it normalizes various GHGs to the same metric. The GHG emissions estimates were calculated using CaIEEMod (Version 2016.3.2). CaIEEMod is an air quality modeling program that estimates air pollution emissions in pounds per day or tons per year for various land uses, area sources, construction projects, and Project operations. Impact Analysis a) Would the project generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? Construction Emissions. Construction activities associated with the proposed Project would produce combustion emissions from various sources. During construction, GHGs would be emitted through the operation of construction equipment and from worker and builder supply vendor vehicles, each of which typically use fossil -based fuels to operate. The combustion of fossil -based fuels creates GHGs such as CO2, CH4, and N20. Furthermore, CH4 is emitted during the fueling of heavy equipment. Exhaust emissions from on -site construction activities would vary daily as construction activity levels change. As indicated above, the SCAQMD does not have an adopted threshold of significance for construction -related GHG emissions. However, Lead Agencies are required to quantify and disclose GHG emissions that would occur during construction. The SCAQMD requires the construction GHG emissions to be amortized over the life of the project (defined as 30 years), added to the operational emissions, and compared to the applicable interim GHG significance threshold tier. Using CaIEEMod, it is estimated that the proposed Project would generate approximately 552 MT CO2e during construction of the Project. When annualized over the 30-year life of the Project, annual emissions would be 18 MT CO2e. The estimated construction emissions would be well below the SCAQMD's threshold criteria of 3,000 MT CO2e per year. Therefore, Project construction would be considered to have a less than significant impact related to GHG emissions and would not, directly or indirectly, have a significant impact on the environment. No mitigation is required. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Project would be required to implement construction exhaust control measures consistent with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 for other air quality topics discussed in Section 4.3 of this IS/MND, including minimization of construction equipment idling and implementation of proper engine tuning and exhaust controls. Both of these measures would reduce GHG emissions during the construction period. Operational Emissions. Long-term operation of the proposed Project would generate GHG emissions from area and mobile sources and indirect emissions from stationary sources associated PASTR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20)> 4-53 203 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 with energy consumption. Mobile -source emissions of GHGs would result from Project -generated vehicle trips. Area -source emissions would be associated with activities such as landscaping and maintenance of the proposed Project, natural gas for heating, and other sources. Increases in stationary -source emissions would also occur at off -site utility providers as a result of demand for electricity, natural gas, and water by the proposed Project. Table 4.8.A shows the calculated GHG emissions for the proposed Project. Table 4.8.A: Operational Greenhouse Gas Emissions Source Pollutant Emissions (MT/yr) Bio-CO2 NBio-CO, Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Construction emissions amortized over 30 years 0 29 29 <1 0 29 Operational Emissions Area Sources 0 34 34 <1 <1 34 Energy Sources 0 172 172 <1 <1 173 Mobile Sources 0 996 996 <1 0 997 Waste Sources 13 0 13 <1 0 32 Water Usage 1 28 30 <1 <1 34 Total Project Emissions 1 14 1,259 1,273 1 <1 1,299 SCAQMD Threshold for Mixed -Use Projects 3,000 Significant? No Source: Compiled by LSA (February 2018). Note: Numbers in table may not appear to add up correctly due to rounding of all numbers. Bio-CO2 = biologically generated carbon dioxide MT/yr = metric tons per year CH4 = methane N20 = nitrous oxide CO2 = carbon dioxide NBio-CO2 = Nonbiologically generated carbon dioxide CO2e = carbon dioxide equivalent SCAQMD = South Coast Air Quality Management District As discussed above, according to SCAQMD, a project would have less than significant GHG emissions if it would result in operation -related GHG emissions of less than 3,000 MT CO2e per year. Based on the analysis results, the proposed Project would result in approximately 1,299 MT CO2e per year, which would be well below the SCAQMD's numeric threshold of 3,000 MT CO2e per year. Therefore, the proposed Project would not generate significant GHG emissions that would have a significant effect on the environment and would have a less than significant impact related to GHG emissions. Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. b) Would the project conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? The City currently does not have an adopted climate action plan to reduce GHG emissions within its jurisdictional boundaries. Absent an adopted climate action plan, the City's General Plan goals and policies related to climate change were used to respond to this threshold. The City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted its updated General Plan and certified the Final Program EIR on May 19, 2010. The following General Plan policies would apply to this analysis: 4-54 P:\STR1901 - Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <<06/18/20» 204 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J GP Policy PS-10.1—Pursue efforts to reduce air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions by implementing effective energy conservation and efficiency measures and promoting the use of renewable energy (e.g., solar, wind, biomass, cogeneration, and hydroelectric power). Implementation Action(s)—Adopt a formal green building program or create one based on a national model, such as Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED), GreenPoint Rated, and/or other programs into the City's codes. GP Policy PS-11.3—Support programs that increase ridesharing, reduce pollutants generated by vehicle use, and meet the transportation control measures recommended by SCAQMD in the most recent Clean Air Plan. Implementation Action(s)—Coordinate with the Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce to provide educational materials and incentives for businesses that engage in carpooling, transit, and flexible work schedules, etc., to reduce the use of individual vehicles. GP Policy PS-11.4—Support regional and local transportation and housing programs that reduce vehicle emissions by decreasing vehicle miles traveled (VMT). Implementation Action(s)—Continue to require development proposal compliance with the City's adopted Transportation Demand Management (TDM) ordinance. The City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted a Sustainable Community Action Plan on April 5, 2017. This plan is focused on citywide measures to advance environmental sustainability and reduce GHG emissions. However, only the following policies would apply to this analysis: LU 1.1—Support new, diverse housing opportunities within walking distance of businesses, employment, and mixed -use areas. LU 1.2—Support building multifamily and mixed -use development in areas identified by the General Plan. The proposed Project would comply with these applicable Rancho Cucamonga General Plan and Sustainable Community Action Plan policies. However, none of these policies includes provisions for determining the effect of compliance, so this analysis does not attempt to determine the reduction in GHG emissions that would result from compliance with these plans. However, as shown in Table 4.8.A, even without including the GHG emissions reductions that would result from compliance with these plans, the proposed Project -related GHG emissions would be well below the SCAQMD threshold. Therefore, the proposed Project would not conflict with plans, policies, or regulations adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions. This impact would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. PASTR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20)> 4-55 205 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 4.9 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS Less than Potentially Significant with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous ❑ ❑ ® ❑ materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions ❑ ❑ ® ❑ involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one -quarter ❑ ❑ ® ❑ mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section ❑ ❑ ® ❑ 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety ❑ ❑ ® ❑ hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the project area? f) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted ❑ ® ❑ ❑ emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? g) Expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a ❑ ❑ ❑ significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires? Discussion: The following section is based on the Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment Proposed Rancho- Etiwanda Development, Northwest of the Intersection of East Avenue and Foothill Boulevard, City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California (Phase I ESA) (Leighton and Associates, Inc., August 2016). This report is included in Appendix G. Impact Analysis a) Would the project create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? Hazardous materials are chemicals that could potentially cause harm during an accidental release or mishap, and are defined as being toxic, corrosive, flammable, reactive, and irritant, or strong sensitizer.31 Hazardous substances include all chemicals regulated under the United States 31 A "sensitizer" is a chemical that can cause a substantial proportion of people or animals to develop an allergic reaction in normal tissue after repeated exposure to a chemical (United States Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration. 2017 Website: https://www.osha.gov/laws- regs/regulations/standardnumber/1917/1917.28AppA (accessed, June 14, 2019). 4-56 PASTR1901 - Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <<06/18/20» 206 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J Department of Transportation's "hazardous materials" regulations and the EPA's "hazardous waste" regulations. Hazardous wastes require special handling and disposal because of their potential to damage public health and the environment. The probable frequency and severity of consequences from the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials is affected by the type of substance, the quantity used or managed, and the nature of the activities and operations. Construction. Construction activities associated with the proposed Project would use a limited amount of hazardous and flammable substances (e.g., oils) during heavy equipment operation for site grading and construction. The amount of hazardous chemicals present during construction is limited and would be in compliance with existing government regulations. The potential for the release of hazardous materials during Project construction is low, and even if a release would occur, it would not result in a significant hazard to the public, surrounding land uses, or environment due to the small quantities of these materials associated with construction vehicles. Therefore, no mitigation is required. Operation. The proposed Project includes the development of a gated residential community with 131 for -rent residential units (73 one -bedroom and 58 two -bedroom units), 4 commercial -ready units, and a commercial space. Residential and small-scale commercial uses, as proposed as part of the Project, typically do not present a hazard associated with the accidental release of hazardous substances into the environment because residents and small-scale businesses are not anticipated to use, store, dispose, or transport large volumes of hazardous materials. Hazardous substances associated with residential uses are typically limited in both amount and use such that they can be contained without impacting the environment. No manufacturing, industrial, or other uses utilizing large amounts of hazardous materials would occur within the Project site. As a mixed -use development, long-term operational activities typical of the proposed residential and commercial uses involve the use and storage of small quantities of potentially hazardous materials in the form of cleaning solvents, fertilizers, and pesticides. For example, maintenance activities related to landscaping include the use of fertilizers and light equipment (e.g., lawn mowers and edgers) that may require fuel. As stated previously, these types of activities do not involve the use of a large or substantial amount of hazardous materials. In addition, such materials would be contained, stored, and used in accordance with manufacturers' instructions and handled in compliance with applicable standards and regulations. Any associated risk would be adequately reduced to a less than significant level through compliance with these standards and regulations. In addition, because the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (RCFPD) is the regulatory authority for the handling of hazardous waste and hazardous materials, all businesses utilizing the commercial space within the proposed Project that would handle hazardous materials are required to prepare hazardous materials release response plans and hazardous materials inventory statements. These release response plans and inventory statements are submitted upon request to the RCFPD.32 With adherence to RCFPD standards, impacts associated with the disposal of hazardous materials and/or the potential release of hazardous materials that could occur with the implementation of the proposed Project are considered less than significant, and no mitigation is required. 32 Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, Section 17.66.040, Hazardous Materials. 2020. PASTR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20)> 4-57 207 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 Therefore, potential impacts from the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials resulting from operation of the proposed Project would be less than significant, and no mitigation would be required. Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. b) Would the project create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? A Phase I ESA (Appendix G) was prepared for APN 1053-091-010-000, which includes the entire Project site. The purpose of the Phase I ESA was to evaluate the Project site for potential Recognized Environmental Concerns (RECs), Historical Recognized Environmental Concerns (HRECs), or Controlled Recognized Environmental Concerns (CRECs) that may be present and/or off -site conditions that impact the Project site. The Phase I ESA prepared for the proposed Project included: (1) a reconnaissance -level visit of the subject site for evidence of the release of hazardous materials and petroleum products; (2) a records review of previous reports, including governmental databases and a historical review; and (3) interviews. The Phase I ESA also assessed whether a vapor encroachment condition (VEC) exists at the subject property, which evaluates whether hazardous materials or other adverse environmental conditions are present due to past or present use of the subject property and/or properties in the vicinity. An REC can be defined as the presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products in or at a property due to a release to the environment, under conditions indicative of a release to the environment, or under conditions that pose a material threat of a future release to the environment. An HREC can be defined as a past release of any hazardous substances or petroleum products that has occurred in connection with the property and has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority or meeting unrestricted use criteria established by a regulatory authority, without subjecting the property to any required controls. A CREC can be defined as a REC resulting from a past release of hazardous substances or petroleum products that has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority, with hazardous substances or petroleum products allowed to remain in place subject to the implementation of required controls. According to the Phase I ESA, no RECs, HRECs, or CRECs were identified that would negatively impact the Project site. During the site reconnaissance survey, evidence of domestic debris/dumped materials such as clothes, furniture, toys, trash, used tires, and electronic waste was observed in the central and southern portions of the subject site. Evidence of minimal dumped construction debris, such as broken concrete and wood, was observed in the western and southern areas of the subject site. Soil stockpiles observed in the central and eastern portions of the subject site appear to be of local origin derived from construction activities from nearby residential housing developments. However, as previously discussed, no RECs were observed on the property. Furthermore, a review of 4-58 PASTR1901 - Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <<06/18/20» 208 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J applicable regulatory databases and the Vapor Encroachment Screen (VES) application did not identify any on -site listings for the subject site. Listings found near the Project site indicated no known releases of hazardous chemicals of concern in sufficient quantities to warrant enforcement action by a regulatory agency. Moreover, no potential RECs were identified as having been historically or currently present on the property during the interviews conducted as part of the Phase I ESA. Based on the findings of the Phase I ESA, no further environmental investigation is recommended. Therefore, the proposed Project would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonable foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment. No mitigation would be required. Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. c) Would the project emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one -quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? The proposed residential Project would not produce hazardous emissions or handle acutely hazardous materials, substances, or wastes. The nearest school to the Project site is Perdew Elementary School, located at 13051 Miller Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga (approximately 0.3 mi northwest of the Project site). As noted in Response 4.9(a), the proposed Project is not anticipated to release hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or wastes in significant quantities. Construction activities associated with the proposed Project would use a limited amount of hazardous and flammable substances/oils during heavy equipment operation for site excavation, grading, and construction. The amount of hazardous chemicals present during construction is limited and would be in compliance with existing government regulations. Residences and businesses would not require the use, storage, disposal, or transport of large volumes of hazardous materials that could cause serious environmental damage in the event of an accident. Although hazardous substances would be present and utilized at these residences and businesses, such substances are generally present now in the existing environment, are typically found in small quantities, and can be cleaned up without affecting the environment. Further, there are no schools within 0.25 mi of the Project site. Therefore, impacts related to hazardous emissions or the handing of hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or wastes within 0.25 mi of an existing or proposed school would be less than significant, and no mitigation would be required. Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. d) Would the project be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? A Phase I ESA was prepared for the proposed Project. According to the Phase I ESA, the Project site is not included on any hazardous materials sites pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment. No mitigation is required. PASTR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20)> 4-59 209 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. e) Would the project be located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the project area? The City of Rancho Cucamonga is a participant in the LA/Ontario International Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (2011). The northern runway of LA/Ontario International Airport is located approximately 1 mi from Rancho Cucamonga's southern boundary.33 The Project site is approximately 5.3 mi from LA/Ontario International Airport. Although Rancho Cucamonga is within the Airport's Influence Area (AIA),34 according to Exhibit 2A of the LA/Ontario International Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan, the Safety and Noise policies included in the plan do not apply to the City.3S No aircraft safety zones affect Rancho Cucamonga'6 because departing planes primarily fly over Ontario and Montclair, and arriving planes primarily fly over Fontana and Ontario. Additionally, the Federal Aviation Administration has not identified any Height Notification Areas or Obstruction Surfaces within the Project vicinity.37 For these reasons, the proposed Project would not result in a safety hazard for people residing or working the Project area. There would be a less than significant impact, and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. f) Would the project impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? Construction. During short-term construction activities, the proposed Project is not anticipated to result in any substantial traffic queuing along East Avenue or West Foothill Boulevard and all construction equipment would be staged on site. All large construction vehicles entering and exiting the site would be guided by the use of personnel using signs and flags to direct traffic. The Project does not include any characteristics (e.g., permanent road closure or long-term blocking of road access) that would physically impair or otherwise interfere with emergency response or evacuation in the Project vicinity. However, the proposed Project would require temporary lane closures on East Avenue for utility connections and construction of the sidewalk adjacent to the Project site. Temporary lane closures would be implemented consistent with the recommendations of the California Joint Utility Traffic Control Manual. Among other things, the manual recommends 33 City of Rancho Cucamonga. 2010. General Plan. Chapter 8: Public Health and Safety. 34 City of Ontario. 2011. LA/Ontario International Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan. 35 Ibid. 36 City of Rancho Cucamonga. 2010. General Plan. Chapter 8: Public Health and Safety. 37 Ibid. 4-60 PASTR1901 - Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <<06/18/20» 210 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J early coordination with affected agencies to ensure that emergency vehicle access is maintained. In this manner, officials could plan and respond appropriately to direct the public away from Lewis Street in the event of an emergency requiring evacuation. In addition, as described in Mitigation Measure HAZ-1, the Project Applicant/Developer would be required to prepare and implement a Construction Staging and Traffic Management Plan, which would be subject to the approval of the Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Department of Public Works, or designee. The Construction Staging and Traffic Management Plan would require certain conditions (e.g., providing warning signs, lights, and devices) and would require that the City of Rancho Cucamonga Police Department be notified a minimum of 48 hours in advance of any lane closures or roadway work. With implementation of Mitigation Measure HAZ-1, potential impacts to emergency response and evacuation plans associated with construction of the proposed Project would be reduced to a less than significant level. Operation. Two emergency plans govern emergency response and evacuation in Rancho Cucamonga. The San Bernardino County Emergency Operations Plan (EOP) describes who is responsible for specific emergency response actions before, during, and immediately after an emergency. The Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (LHMP) establishes long-term strategies to reduce losses resulting from a disaster and identifies capital improvement projects to mitigate potential damage before a disaster occurs.38 According to the LHMP, earthquakes, wildland fire, and failure of the San Antonio Dam have the potential to impair adopted emergency response and evacuation plans, as well as restrict access to local acute care hospitals.39 Although there are no officially designated evacuation routes in Rancho Cucamonga, regional access to and from the Project site is largely dependent on 1-15 and West Foothill Boulevard. The proposed Project does not include any changes to public or private roadways that would physically impair or otherwise conflict with any emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. Further, the proposed Project would not obstruct or alter any transportation routes that could be used as evacuation routes during emergency events. During short-term construction activities, the proposed Project is not anticipated to result in any substantial traffic queuing along East Avenue or West Foothill Boulevard and all construction equipment would be staged on site. During the operational phase of the proposed Project, on -site access would be required to comply with standards established by the City and the RCFPD. The size and location of fire suppression facilities (e.g., hydrants) and fire access routes on the Project site would be required to conform to City and RCFPD standards. The proposed Project would provide adequate emergency access to the site via a driveway and easement off of East Avenue; the driveway and easement would connect to an internal accessway that would ensure access for emergency vehicles within the interior of the site. Conversely, the easement would connect the Project site to East Avenue, which connects to West Foothill Boulevard. As established above, Foothill Boulevard is a principal corridor providing access to the greater region in the event of an emergency. 38 City of Rancho Cucamonga. Ready RC. Before, During and After an Emergency in Rancho Cucamonga. 2015. 39 City of Rancho Cucamonga. Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. 2013. PASTR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20)> 4-61 211 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION JUNE 2020 As previously stated, the Project would be developed in accordance with City emergency access standards. Access to and from the Project site for emergency vehicles would be reviewed and approved by the RCFPD and the City as part of the project approval process to ensure the proposed Project is compliant with all applicable codes and ordinances for emergency vehicle access. Operational Project impacts would be less than significant. Therefore, impacts related to emergency response and evacuation plans associated with operation of the proposed Project would be less than significant. Impacts related to emergency response and evacuation plans associated with construction of the proposed Project would be reduced to a less than significant level with the incorporation of Mitigation Measure HAZ-1. Significance Determination: Potentially Significant Impact. Mitigation Measures: HAZ-1 Construction Staging and Traffic Management Plan. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, a Construction Staging and Traffic Management Plan shall be prepared for approval by the Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Public Works Department, or designee. The Construction Staging and Traffic Management Plan shall also include the name and phone number of a contact person who can be reached 24 hours per day regarding construction traffic complaints or emergency situations. The Construction Staging and Traffic Management Plan may include, but not be limited to, the following: • Temporary lane closures shall be implemented consistent with the recommendations of the California Joint Utility Traffic Control Manual. • Flagpersons in adequate numbers shall be provided to minimize impacts to traffic flow and to ensure safe access into and out of the site. • Flagpersons shall be trained to assist in emergency response by restricting or controlling the movement of traffic that could interfere with emergency vehicle access. • All emergency access to the Project site and adjacent areas shall be kept clear and unobstructed during all phases of demolition and construction. • Safety precautions shall be provided for pedestrians and bicyclists through such measures as alternate routing and protection barriers. • Construction -related deliveries other than concrete and earthwork -related deliveries shall be scheduled so as to reduce travel during peak travel periods (i.e., 6:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. and 3:30 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. Monday through Friday). • The construction contractor shall coordinate with other construction projects in the vicinity to minimize conflicts. 4-62 PASTR1901 - Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <<06/18/20» 212 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION DUNE 2020 W ESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J • If necessary, a California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) transportation permit shall be obtained for use of oversized transport vehicles on Caltrans facilities. • If necessary, a traffic management plan shall be submitted to Caltrans for review and approval. • Construction vehicles, including construction personnel vehicles, shall not park on public streets, including streets outside Rancho Cucamonga. • Construction vehicles shall not stage or queue where they interfere with pedestrian and vehicular traffic or block access to nearby businesses. • If feasible, any traffic lane closures shall be limited to off-peak traffic periods, as approved by the City of Rancho Cucamonga Department of Public Works. • The Rancho Cucamonga Police Department shall be notified a minimum of 48 hours in advance of any lane closures or other roadway work. Level of Significance after Mitigation: Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. g) Would the project expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires? In its existing setting, the Project site is vacant and undeveloped. However, the Project site is located within an urban area of Rancho Cucamonga and is bounded by East Avenue to the east, single-family residential housing to the north, Garcia Park to the northwest, and open space/vacant land to the west and south, with residential uses bordering these vacant areas. The Project site is not within or near a Wildland-Urban Interface Fire Area40 or any Fire Hazard Severity Zones (FHSZ).41 As a result, the proposed Project would not expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving wildland fires. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated, and no mitigation would be required. Significance Determination: No Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. 40 City of Rancho Cucamonga. 2013. Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. 41 CAL FIRE. 2012. FHSZ Viewer. Website: https:Hegis.fire.ca.gov/FHSZ/ (accessed June 22, 2019). PASTR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20)> 4-63 213 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 4.10 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY Less than Potentially Significant with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ groundwater quality? b) Substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that the ❑ ❑ ❑ project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would: i. Result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -site; ❑ ❑ ® ❑ ii. Substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or ❑ ❑ ® ❑ offsite; iii. Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage ❑ ❑ ® ❑ systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff; or iv. Impede or redirect flood flows? ❑ ❑ ❑ d) In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk release of ❑ ❑ ® ❑ pollutants due to project inundation? e) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality ❑ ❑ ® ❑ control plan or sustainable eroundwater management Dlan? Discussion The discussion and analysis provided in this section are based on the Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (PWQMP) prepared by Madole and Associates, Inc. (Appendix H of this IS/MND). Impact Analysis a) Would the project violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or groundwater quality? Construction. The proposed Project involves the construction of a two- and three-story mixed -use development for residential and commercial purposes on the Project site. Pollutants of concern during construction include sediments, trash, petroleum products, concrete waste (dry and wet), sanitary waste, and chemicals. Each of these pollutants on its own or in combination with other pollutants can have a detrimental effect on water quality. During construction activities, excavated soil would be exposed, and there would be an increased potential for soil erosion and sedimentation compared to existing conditions. In addition, chemicals, liquid products, petroleum products (e.g., paints, solvents, and fuels), and concrete -related waste may be spilled or leaked and have the 4-64 PASTR1901 - Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <<06/18/20» 214 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J potential to be transported via stormwater runoff into receiving waters (i.e., the Santa Ana River and ultimately the Pacific Ocean). During construction, the disturbed soil area would be approximately 5.74 ac. Because construction of the proposed Project would disturb greater than 1 ac of soil, the Project is subject to the requirements of the SWRCB's NPDES permit Waste Discharge Requirements for Discharges of Storm Water Runoff Associated with Construction and Land Disturbance Activities (Order No. 2009-0009- DWQ, NPDES No. CAS000002, as amended by Orders No. 2010-0014-DWQ and 2012-0006-DWQ) (Construction General Permit). The Construction General Permit requires preparation of a SWPPP and implementation of construction BMPs during construction activities. Construction BMPs would include, but not be limited to, Erosion Control and Sediment Control BMPs designed to minimize erosion and retain sediment on site and Good Housekeeping BMPs to prevent spills, leaks, and discharge of construction debris and waste into receiving waters. As specified in RCM-WQ-1, the Project would obtain coverage under the Construction General Permit. In compliance with the Construction General Permit, a SWPPP would be prepared for the Project and construction BMPs implemented to target pollutants of concern. Implementation of RCM-WQ-1 would ensure construction impacts related to WDRs, water quality standards, and surface water quality would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. According to the Geotechnical Investigation prepared for the Project, groundwater was not encountered during exploratory borings at depths of 51.5 ft bgs. Groundwater depths on site were reported by the Chino Basin Watermaster at depths of 500 ft bgs during fall 2006 and spring 2012. Additionally, groundwater measurements were taken at a nearby well from March 2011 through May 2016, which indicated the highest level of groundwater was approximately 575 ft bgs. Therefore, based on these recorded depths of groundwater, excavation activities would not have the potential to encounter groundwater and groundwater dewatering would not be required during construction. Infiltration of stormwater can have the potential to affect groundwater quality in areas of shallow groundwater. As discussed above, groundwater could occur at depths in the range of 500 ft bgs. Pollutants in stormwater are generally removed by soil through absorption as water infiltrates. Therefore, in areas of deep groundwater, there is more absorption potential and, as a result, less potential for pollutants to reach groundwater. Therefore, due to the depth to groundwater, it is not expected that any stormwater that may infiltrate during construction would affect groundwater quality because there is not a direct path for pollutants to reach groundwater. Therefore, Project construction would not substantially degrade groundwater quality. Operation. Based on the proposed mixed -use (attached residential and commercial) on the Project site, expected pollutants of concern from long-term operations include pathogens (bacteria/viruses), metals, nutrients/noxious aquatic plants, organic compounds, pesticides/ herbicides, sediments/total suspended solids/pH, trash and debris, oxygen -demanding compounds, and oil and grease. The Project would comply with the requirements of the Santa Ana RWQCB's NPDES Permit and Waste Discharge Requirements for the San Bernardino County Flood Control District, the County of San Bernardino, and the Incorporated Cities of San Bernardino County within the Santa Ana Region (Order No. R8-2010-0036, NPDES No. CAS618036) (San Bernardino County MS4 permit). Section 19.20.260 of the City's Municipal Code and the San Bernardino County MS4 PASTR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20)> 4-65 215 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 permit require that a WQMP be prepared for new development projects. WQMPs specify the Site Design/LID, Source Control, and/or Treatment Control BMPs that would be implemented to capture, treat, and reduce pollutants of concern in stormwater runoff. A PWQMP (Madole and Associates, Inc., June 2019) has been prepared for the Project. As specified in RCM-WQ-2, the PWQMP will be refined during final design based on the final site plan. According to the PWQMP, proposed BMPs include a storm drain stencil to discourage downstream dumping, a catch basin filter to remove the majority of trash and debris prior to reaching underground storm drains, a settling chamber to filter pollutants, and an injection well to drain and infiltrate water runoff. Stormwater runoff from the Project site would be captured and conveyed by on -site catch basins and storm drains throughout the site and conveyed to an injection well at the southwest corner of the site. Stormwater runoff would be treated initially within the pre-treatment chamber, where trash, debris, and sediments would settle at the bottom. A floating sponge would further remove pollutants, and intake screens would then filter the stormwater before it enters the connection pipe adjacent to the injection well. The injection well would collect and filter runoff through a vertical gravel pit. Prior to leaving the Project site, the injection well would collect the first flush (i.e. initial surface runoff) during a storm event, and a diversion manhole would intercept low - flow stormwater runoff. Stormwater runoff that exceeds the first flush would be conveyed to the proposed storm drain system in East Avenue, which would connect to the existing storm drain system in East Avenue. As specified in RCM-WQ-2, the Project would comply with the City Municipal Code and San Bernardino County MS4 Permit requirements, including incorporation of post - construction BMPs to target pollutants of concern in stormwater runoff. Compliance with these requirements would reduce operational impacts related to WDRs, water quality standards, degradation of water quality, and beneficial uses to a less than significant level, and no mitigation would be required. As discussed previously, infiltration of stormwater could have the potential to affect groundwater quality in areas of shallow groundwater. Due to the depth to groundwater, it is not expected that any stormwater that may infiltrate during construction would affect groundwater quality because there is not a direct path for pollutants to reach groundwater. In addition, the Project would be required to implement LID features to treat stormwater before it could reach groundwater. Therefore, Project operation would not substantially degrade groundwater quality. Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Regulatory Compliance Measures and Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. However, the following Regulatory Compliance Measures are standard conditions based on local, State, and federal regulations or laws that serve to reduce impacts related to hydrology and water quality. These Regulatory Compliance Measures are applicable to the proposed Project and shall be incorporated to ensure that the Project has minimal impacts to receiving waters. RCM-WQ-1 Construction General Permit. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the Applicant shall obtain coverage under the State Water Resources Control Board National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System General Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Construction and Land Disturbance Activities (Order No. 2009-0009- DWQ, National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System No. CAS000002, as amended 4-66 PASTR1901 - Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <<06/18/20» 216 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J by Orders No. 2010-0014-DWQ and 2012-0006-DWQ) (Construction General Permit). This shall include submission of Permit Registration Documents (PRDs), including a Notice of Intent (NOI) for coverage under the permit to the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) via the Stormwater Multiple Application and Report Tracking System (SMARTS). The Applicant shall provide the Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID) to the City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) to demonstrate proof of coverage under the Construction General Permit. A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be prepared and implemented for the proposed Project in compliance with the requirements of the Construction General Permit. The SWPPP shall identify construction best management practices (BMPs) to be implemented to ensure that the potential for soil erosion and sedimentation is minimized and to control the discharge of pollutants in stormwater runoff as a result of construction activities. Upon completion of construction and stabilization of the site, a Notice of Termination will be submitted via SMARTS. RCM-WQ-2: Water Quality Management Plan. Prior to the issuance of any grading or building permits, the Applicant shall submit a Final Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) to the City Engineer, or designee, for review and approval in compliance with the requirements of Section 19.20.260 of the City's Municipal Code and the Waste Discharge Requirements for the San Bernardino County Flood Control District, the County of San Bernardino, and the Incorporated Cities of San Bernardino County within the Santa Ana Region (Order No. R8-2010-0036, NPDES No. CAS618036) (San Bernardino County MS4 Permit). The Final WQMP shall be prepared consistent with the requirements of the Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans (June 2013) and the Water Quality Management Plan template, or subsequent guidance manuals. The Final WQMP shall specify the BMPs to be incorporated into the Project design to target pollutants of concern in runoff from the Project area. The City shall ensure that the BMPs specified in the Final WQMP are incorporated into the final Project design. b) Would the project substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that the project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin? Construction. According to the Geotechnical Investigation prepared for the Project, groundwater has historically been encountered at deep depths of approximately 500 ft bgs. Because of the depth to groundwater, excavation activities would not be anticipated to encounter groundwater during construction. Therefore, groundwater dewatering would not be required. Furthermore, groundwater extraction would not be required during Project construction. Therefore, construction impacts related to depletion of groundwater supplies or interference with groundwater recharge would be less than significant, and no mitigation would be required. Operation. Currently, the Project site is undeveloped and consists of only pervious surfaces. According to the PWQMP, development of the Project would increase impervious surface area on the Project site by approximately 5 ac. The increase in impervious surface area as a result of Project implementation would decrease on -site infiltration. However, due to the depth of groundwater, it is PASTR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20)> 4-67 217 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 unlikely that groundwater recharge from stormwater infiltration currently occurs on the Project site. In addition, the Project site is within the Chino Subbasin of the Upper Santa Ana Valley Groundwater Basin, which is managed by the Chino Basin Watermaster.42 Any decrease in infiltration would be minimal in comparison to the size of the Chino Subbasin of the Upper Santa Ana Valley Groundwater Basin, which has an unused storage capacity of 1 million acre-feet.43 The Project would also include BMPs to increase infiltration of stormwater runoff on the Project site. Furthermore, Project operation would not include groundwater extraction. For these reasons, no impacts related to depletion of groundwater supplies or interference with groundwater recharge would occur, and no mitigation would be required. Significance Determination: No Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. c) Would the project substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would: i Result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -site? Construction. During construction activities, soil would be exposed and disturbed, drainage patterns would be temporarily altered during grading and other construction activities, and there would be an increased potential for soil erosion and siltation compared to existing conditions. Additionally, during a storm event, soil erosion and siltation could occur at an accelerated rate. As discussed above in Response 4.10(a), the Construction General Permit requires preparation of a SWPPP to identify construction BMPs to be implemented as part of the proposed Project to reduce impacts to water quality during construction, including those impacts associated with soil erosion and siltation. With compliance with the requirements in the Construction General Permit and implementation of the construction BMPs as indicated in RCM-WQ-1, construction impacts related to on- or off -site erosion or siltation would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. Operation. Currently, the Project site is undeveloped and consists of only pervious surfaces. Development of the Project would increase impervious surface area on the Project site to a total of approximately 5 ac, which would increase stormwater runoff. However, impervious surface areas associated with development of the Project site are not prone to erosion or siltation. Erosion and siltation would be minimal in the proposed landscaped areas. In the undeveloped areas, erosion and siltation would be similar to the existing condition. Therefore, impacts related to on -site erosion or siltation would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. The proposed on -site storm drain facilities would connect to an existing off -site storm drain system located south of the Project site in East Avenue. Although stormwater runoff would eventually be discharged to receiving waters via the existing storm drain system, there is minimal potential for 42 Chino Basin Watermaster. 2019a. Sustainable Groundwater Management Act. 43 Chino Basin Watermaster. 2019b. Overview. Website: http://www.cbwm.org/overview.htm (accessed June 11, 2019). 4-68 PASTR1901 - Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <<06/18/20» 218 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J downstream erosion or siltation to occur because the receiving waters are not subject to hydromodification44 and the Project would therefore not contribute to a hydrologic condition of concern (HCOC).45 According to the Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans, the Project site is located in an area meeting the HCOC exemption criteria because all downstream conveyance channels flow to an adequate sum and drain to storage areas that are controlled release points used for water conservation where the receiving waters are subject to hydromodification impacts.46 The Project site is in an area exempt from HCOC, as Project operations would not substantially increase runoff flow or volume compared to existing conditions. Therefore, a less than significant impact related to off -site erosion or siltation would occur, and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. c) Would the project substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would: ii Substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would: result in flooding on- or offsite? Currently, the Project site is undeveloped and consists of only pervious surfaces. As stated in Response 4.10(c)(i), above, development of the proposed Project would increase impervious surface area by approximately 5 ac, which would increase stormwater runoff and could potentially result in flooding. However, the proposed on -site storm drain facilities and LID BMPs (a catch basin filter, a settling chamber, and an injection well) would capture and infiltrate stormwater runoff. In addition, as specified in Regulatory Compliance Measure RCM-WQ-3, a Final Hydrology Study would be prepared based on final Project plans and would be approved by the City. The Hydrology Study would confirm that sufficient capacity in the downstream drain systems is available to accommodate any increase in storm runoff from the Project site. The proposed drainage facilities and BMPs needed to accommodate stormwater runoff would also be appropriately sized so that on -site flooding would not occur. Finally, the proposed Project would not alter the course of a stream or river. With implementation of LID BMPs and RCM-WQ-3, impacts related to on- or off -site flooding from an increase in surface runoff would be less than significant and no mitigation is required. 44 Hydromodification is defined as hydrologic changes resulting from increased runoff from increases in impervious surfaces. Hydromodification impacts can included changes in downstream erosion and sedimentation. 45 Areas designated as hydrologic conditions of concern are watersheds of unarmored or soft -armored drainages that are vulnerable to geomorphology changes due to hydromodification. 46 County of San Bernardino. 2013. Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans. Appendix F: HCOC Exemption Criteria and Map. PASTR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20)> 4-69 219 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Regulatory Compliance Measures and Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. However, the following Regulatory Compliance Measure would be implemented to reduce impacts. RCM-WQ-3: Final Hydrology and Hydraulic Analysis. The Applicant shall submit a Final Hydrology Study to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Director of Engineering, or his/her designee, for review and approval prior to issuance of grading and building permits. The Final Hydrology Study shall demonstrate that the on -site drainage facilities are designed and adequately sized to convey and reduce runoff, such that on -site and off -site drainage facility capacity would not be exceeded during a design storm. c) Would the project substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would: iii Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? As discussed in Response 4.10(a), pollutants of concern during construction include sediments, trash, petroleum products, concrete waste (dry and wet), sanitary waste, and chemicals. Each of these pollutants on its own or in combination with other pollutants can have a detrimental effect on water quality. Drainage patterns would be temporarily altered during grading and other construction activities, and construction -related pollutants could be spilled, leaked, or transported via storm runoff into adjacent drainages and downstream receiving waters. However, as specified in RCM-WQ-1, the proposed Project would be required to comply with the requirements set forth by the Construction General Permit and SWPPP, which would specify BMPs to be implemented to control the discharge of pollutants in stormwater runoff as a result of construction activities. Operation of the proposed Project has the potential to introduce pollutants to the storm drain system from the proposed on -site uses. As discussed in Response 4.10(a), expected pollutants of concern from long-term operations include pathogens (bacteria/viruses), metals, nutrients/noxious aquatic plants, organic compounds, pesticides/herbicides, sediments/total suspended solids/pH, trash and debris, oxygen -demanding compounds, and oil and grease. As required by RCM-WQ-2, the Final WQMP would require implementation of operational BMPs to reduce pollutants of concern in stormwater runoff. With implementation of operational BMPs, no substantial additional sources of polluted runoff would be discharged to the storm drain system. Development of the proposed Project would increase impervious surface area on the Project site to a total of approximately 5 ac, which would increase stormwater runoff generated during Project operation. The proposed on -site storm drain would run south and connect to the existing storm drain system in East Avenue. As specified in RCM-WQ-3, the Final Hydrology Study shall demonstrate that the on -site drainage facilities are designed and adequately sized to convey and reduce runoff, such that on -site and off -site drainage facility capacity would not be exceeded during 4-70 PASTR1901 - Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <<06/18/20» 220 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J a design storm. With implementation of RCM-WQ-3, the proposed Project would not result in an exceedance of planned or existing stormwater drainage systems. For the reasons discussed above, with adherence to measures RCM-WQ-1, RCM-WQ-2, and RCM- WQ-3, Project impacts associated with the introduction of substantial sources of polluted runoff or additional runoff would be less than significant and would not result in an exceedance in capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems. No mitigation would be required. Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required; however, RCM-WQ-1 and RCM-WQ-2 (provided in Responses 4.10[a]) and RCM-WQ-3 (provided in Response 4.10[c][ii]) would be implemented to reduce impacts. c) Would the project substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would: iv Impede or redirect flood flows? The Project site is not located within a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) designated 100-year floodplain. According to the FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) No. 06071C8635J,47 the Project site is located within Zone X, Area with Reduced Flood Risk Due to Levee. Specifically, the Project site is not located within a direct inundation area, and is protected by a levee from flooding of the 100-year regulatory floodway associated with the Etiwanda Creek Channel, located approximately 250 ft to the east of the Project site.48 As the Project would not place improvements and structures directly within a 100-year floodplain, the Project would not impede or redirect flood flows. Therefore, no impact would occur related to impeding or redirecting of flood flows and no mitigation would be required. Significance Determination: No Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. d) Would the Project result in flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, would the project risk release of pollutants due to project inundation? Tsunami. Tsunamis are ocean waves generated by tectonic displacement of the sea floor associated with shallow earthquakes, sea floor landslides, rock falls, and exploding volcanic islands. Tsunamis can have wavelengths of up to 120 mi and travel as fast as 500 mph across hundreds of miles of deep ocean. Upon reaching shallow coastal waters, the waves can reach up to 50 ft in height, causing great devastation to near -shore structures. The Project site is located approximately 40 mi 47 FEMA. 2014. FIRM No. 06071C8635J. September 26. 48 City of Rancho Cucamonga. Local Hazard Mitigation Plan, Figure PS-5. 2013. PASTR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20)> 4-71 221 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 from the Pacific Ocean shoreline and is not located within a tsunami inundation area. Therefore, the Project site is not subject to inundation from tsunamis, and there is no risk of release of pollutants due to inundation from tsunami. Seiche Zones. Seiching occurs when seismic ground shaking induces standing waves (seiches) inside water retention facilities (e.g., reservoirs and lakes). Such waves can cause retention structures to fail and flood downstream properties. Because there are no large lakes, reservoirs, or other water retention facilities in the vicinity of the Project site, the Project site is not at risk of inundation from seiche. Therefore, the Project site is not subject to inundation from seiche waves, and there is no risk of release of pollutants due to inundation from seiche. Flood Hazard. As discussed in Response 4.10(c)(iv), the Project site is located within Zone X, Area with Reduced Flood Risk Due to Levee. Specifically, the Project site is protected from flooding of the 100-year regulatory floodway associated with the Etiwanda Creek Channel, located approximately 250 ft to the east of the Project site. However, according to the City's General Plan, the Project site is downstream of the Etiwanda Debris Basin and the San Sevaine Basin.49 Basin failure could occur as a result of flooding during storms, which could result in inundation of downstream areas. Therefore, in the unlikely event of levee failure and flooding during a storm, there would be a risk of inundation and pollutant risk on the Project site. The Project would introduce new land uses (mixed -use residential and commercial) on the Project site, which would change the potential on -site pollutants compared to existing conditions. However, as discussed in Response 4.10(a), BMPs would be implemented to target and reduce pollutants of concern on the Project site. In addition, as discussed in Section 4.9, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, hazardous substances associated with commercial and residential uses would be limited in both amount and use. The materials used on site would be contained, stored, and used in accordance with manufacturers' instructions and handled in compliance with applicable standards and regulations. Because BMPs would reduce introduction of pollutants on the site and any hazardous materials used on site would be properly stored and contained, there would be a low potential for pollutants to be released from the Project site in the unlikely event of levee failure and inundation of the Project site. Therefore, impacts related to release of pollutants in the event of inundation from flooding would be less than significant. No mitigation is required. Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. e) Would the project conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan? The Project is within the jurisdiction of the Santa Ana RWQCB. The Santa Ana RWQCB adopted a Water Quality Control Plan (i.e., Basin Plan) (January 1995, with amendments effective on or before February 2016) which designates beneficial uses for all surface and groundwater within its jurisdiction and establishes the water quality objectives and standards necessary to protect those 49 City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. 2010h. Chapter 8: Public Health and Safety, Figure PS-6. 4-72 PASTR1901 - Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <<06/18/20» 222 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J beneficial uses. As summarized below, the Project would comply with the applicable NPDES permits and would implement construction and operational BMPs to reduce pollutants of concern in stormwater runoff. As discussed in Response 4.10(a), during construction activities, excavated soil would be exposed, and there would be an increased potential for soil erosion and sedimentation compared to existing conditions. In addition, chemicals, liquid products, petroleum products (e.g., paints, solvents, and fuels), and concrete -related waste may be spilled or leaked and have the potential to be transported via stormwater runoff into receiving waters. As specified in RCM-WQ-1, the proposed Project would be required to comply with the requirements set forth by the Construction General Permit, which requires preparation of a SWPPP and implementation of construction BMPs to control stormwater runoff and discharge of pollutants. As discussed in Response 4.10(a), the primary pollutants of concern during Project operations are pathogens (bacteria/viruses), metals, nutrients/noxious aquatic plants, organic compounds, pesticides/herbicides, sediments/total suspended solids/pH, trash and debris, oxygen -demanding compounds, and oil and grease. As discussed in RCM-WQ-2, a final WQMP would be prepared for the Project in compliance with the San Bernardino County MS4 Permit and the City Municipal Code. The Final WQMP will detail the Site Design/LID, Source Control, and/or Treatment Control BMPs that would be implemented to treat stormwater runoff and reduce impacts to water quality during operation. The proposed BMPs would capture and treat stormwater runoff and reduce pollutants of concern in stormwater runoff. The proposed Project would comply with the applicable NPDES permit, which requires preparation of a SWPPP, preparation of a Final WQMP, and implementation of construction and operational BMPs to reduce pollutants of concern in stormwater runoff. As such, the Project would not result in water quality impacts that would conflict with Santa Ana RWQCB's Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan). Impacts related to conflict with a water quality control plan would be less than significant and no mitigation is required. The Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA) was enacted in September 2014. SGMA requires governments and water agencies of high- and medium -priority basins to halt overdraft of groundwater basins. SGMA requires the formation of local Groundwater Sustainability Agencies (GSAs), which are required to adopt Groundwater Sustainability Plans to manage the sustainability of the groundwater basins. The Project site is located within the Chino Subbasin of the Upper Santa Ana Valley Groundwater Basin, which is managed by the Chino Basin Watermaster.50 The Chino Basin Watermaster Board consists of nine governing members who collaborate with regional stakeholders to manage groundwater in the Chino Subbasin. The Chino Subbasin is identified by the Department of Water Resources as a very low -priority basin;" therefore, development of a 50 Chino Basin Watermaster. 2019a. "Sustainable Groundwater Management Act." Website: http://www.cbwm.org/rep_sgma.htm (accessed March 9, 2020). 51 California Department of Water Resources, SIGMA Basin Prioritization Dashboard, Groundwater Basins 2016. Website: https://gis.water.ca.gov/app/bp-dashboard/p2/ (accessed June 10, 2019). PASTR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20)> 4-73 223 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 Groundwater Sustainability Plan is not required.52 Because there is not an adopted Groundwater Sustainability Plan applicable to the groundwater basin within the Project area, the Project would not conflict with or obstruct the implementation of a sustainable groundwater management plan. As discussed in Thresholds 4.10 (a) and 4.10 (b), the proposed Project does not have the potential to impact groundwater quality, interfere with groundwater recharge, or decrease groundwater supplies. Therefore, no impact would occur related to conflict with or obstruction of water quality control plans or sustainable groundwater management plans, and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required; however, RCM-WQ-1 and RCM-WQ-2, provided in Response 4.10(a), would be implemented to reduce impacts. 52 California Department of Water Resources. 2020. "Groundwater Sustainability Plans." Website: https://water.ca.gov/Programs/Groundwater-Management/SGMA-Groundwater-Management/ Groundwater-Sustainability-Plans (accessed March 8, 2020). 4-74 PASTR1901 - Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <<06/18/20» 224 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J 4.11 LAND USE AND PLANNING Less than Potentially Significant with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? ❑ ❑ ❑ b) Cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? Impact Analysis a) Would the project physically divide an established community? The Project site (APN 1053-091-010-000) consists of an 11.45 ac parcel that is partially encumbered by utility easements. The Project site is primarily surrounded by residential uses, with mixed uses present to the southeast and west, commercial uses present to the north, and vacant land (approved for a 193-unit, mixed -use development) to the south. In addition, several utility easements traverse the Project site and areas beyond in a northeast -southwest fashion. A cellular tower and a building pad associated with a CVWD pumping station are located south of the Project site, and a CVWD pumping station is located along the southern property line. The proposed Project involves the development of a two- and three-story mixed -use development consisting of 131 for -rent residential units (73 one -bedroom and 58 two -bedroom units), 4 commercial -ready units (305 sf each) that are attached to one -bedroom residential units, and a 1,592 sf commercial space. The commercial -ready units are designed to be used either as commercial space or as a second bedroom for the attached residential unit. With the exception of sidewalk improvements, curb cuts, and connections to existing utility infrastructure in surrounding roadways, all Project development would occur on the Project site. The proposed Project includes a Tentative Tract Map to subdivide the Project site for condominiums. At this time, the Project is intended to be for -rent apartments, but the Tentative Tract Map would allow the Project to be converted to condominiums in the future. Implementation of the proposed Project would not change the existing parcel configuration in any area other than the Project site. The proposed Project would not divide or separate any existing land uses or neighborhoods. The neighboring residential communities are not immediately proximate to the Project site and would not be impacted by the addition of driveways (one gated driveway on East Avenue and one ungated driveway at the East Avenue/Marshall Court intersection) and the development of a residential community on currently vacant land. The construction of the proposed Project, including access improvements and the Tentative Tract Map included as part of the Project, would not result in the physical division of an established community, including the residential communities north, east, and south of the site. Therefore, PASTR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20)> 4-75 225 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 implementation of the proposed Project would not result in the physical division of any established community, and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: No Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. b) Would the project cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? The main documents regulating land use on the Project site and immediate vicinity are the City's General Plan and Zoning Code. The proposed Project's relationship to these planning documents is described below. The existing land use designation in the General Plan is Mixed Use (MU).53 The existing zoning classification on the Project site is Community Commercial (CC); however, the site is also located within the FBOD. General Plan. The Rancho Cucamonga General Plan (2010) is the City's most fundamental planning document. The General Plan is comprehensive plan intended to guide the physical development of the City, and it serves as a blueprint for future growth and development. As a blueprint for the future, the plan contains policies and programs designed to provide decision -makers with a solid basis for decisions related to land use and development. The proposed Project is consistent with the site's General Plan land use designation of Mixed Use (MU). Table HE-35 in the Housing Element of the City's 2010 General Plan identifies the allowable density range of the Mixed Use (MU) designation in the city. According to the Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources Element, each Mixed Use designation has slightly different development parameters depending on the location within the city. The target density for all of Mixed Use (MU) designations range from 4 to 30 du/ac. Following Project implementation, the Project site would have a net density of 22.8 du/ac, which would be within the target density range for the Mixed Use (MU) designation. Table 4.11.A provides a consistency analysis of the relevant goals and policies from the City's General Plan. In order to avoid repetition and focus on key issues, goals, policies, and implementation programs that are not relevant to the proposed Project are not included in Table 4.11.A. 53 The City's General Plan Land Use Designation of the Project site has changed subsequent to the adoption of the 2010 Land Use Plan Map. Refer to General Plan Amendment DRC2015-0087. 4-76 PASTR1901 - Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <<06/18/20» 226 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C A JUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J `L` Table 4.11.A: General Plan Consistency Analysis Select General Plan Policies I Consistency Analysis Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources Element Policy LU-1: Protect neighborhoods from Consistent. The proposed Project would introduce residential and the encroachment of incompatible commercial units to a currently vacant site that is surrounded by existing activities or land uses that may have a residential and commercial developments. Therefore, the proposed negative impact on the residential living Project would not result in the encroachment of incompatible activities or environment. land uses that may have a negative impact on the residential living environment, and the proposed Project is consistent with Policy LU-1. Policy LU-1.5: Development of densities Consistent. The proposed Project would have a net density of 22.8 du/ac, and intensities shall be implemented which would be neither higher nor lower than the limits of the allowable within the ranges specified in the General target density range of 4 du/ac and 30 du/ac for the Mixed Use (MU) Plan; neither higher nor lower than the designation. As such, the proposed Project would develop the Project site limits of the range. with a mixed -use community that is within the target density outlined in the City's General Plan. Therefore, the proposed Project would be consistent with Policy LU-1.5. Policy LU-2.1: Plan for vibrant, pedestrian- Consistent. The proposed Project would develop the currently vacant site friendly Mixed Use and high density with a high -density mixed -use community consisting of residential and residential areas at strategic infill commercial uses. In its existing setting, the Project site is predominantly locations along transit routes. surrounded by residential and commercial uses and is located in an urban area of Rancho Cucamonga. The Project site is also within the vicinity of Foothill Boulevard and 1-15, which are major roadways providing regional access to the Project site. In addition, the site is within walking distance (less than 0.25 mile) from an Omnitrans bus stop, which serves Route 66 along Foothill Boulevard. As such, the proposed Project would allow for the development of a mixed -use community in a strategic infill location. Therefore, the proposed Project would be consistent with Policy LU-2.1. Policy LU-4.1: Provide new Mixed Use Consistent. As previously stated, the proposed Project would provide a development opportunities along the mixed -use development consisting of residential and commercial uses Foothill Boulevard Corridor to allow along the Foothill Boulevard Corridor. Therefore, the proposed Project residential, commercial, and civic uses, would be consistent with Policy LU-4.1. and to accommodate both traffic and automobiles. Policy LU-8.2: Approve only those Consistent. As established in Section 4.15, Public Services, the proposed residential densities that do not exceed Project would not exceed the capacity of the land or the ability to the capacity of the land or the ability to reasonably provide public services or adequate public safety. Fire, police, reasonably provide public services and water, wastewater, and school services would not be interrupted by the adequate public safety. proposed Project or require expansion as a result of Project implementation. In addition, the proposed Project would be developed at a density that would be within the target range for mixed -use land uses, as established in the City's General Plan. Consequently, the Project would not exceed the land capacity of the property. Therefore, the proposed Project would be consistent with Policy LU-8.2. Policy LU-8.3: Require adequate access Consistent. The proposed Project would be developed in compliance with for emergency vehicles and evacuations. RCFPD and California Fire Code standards relating to adequate access for emergency vehicles. The Project's proposed circulation system, including internal roads and driveways, has been designed to the appropriate size requirements to accommodate emergency vehicles. Moreover, as established in Section 4.9, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, and Section 4.20, Wildfire, the proposed Project would not impair an emergency response or emergency evacuation plan. Therefore, the proposed Project is consistent with Policy LU-8.3. P:\STR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean. docx a06/18/20» 4-77 227 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 Table 4.11.A: General Plan Consistency Analysis Select General Plan Policies I Consistency Analysis Housing Element Objective HE-1.1: Ensure a wide range of Consistent. As discussed in Section 4.14, Population and Housing, SCAG housing alternatives and enable the City has established an RHNA goal for the City to develop 848 new housing to achieve its share of the RHNA through units for a range of income groups by the year 2021. The proposed Project the utilization of land use distribution and would introduce 131 new market -rate housing units to the City's housing development standards to encourage a supply and would help the City meet its current housing needs and the mix of housing types, including mobile RHNA goal. Therefore, the proposed Project is consistent with Objective homes and apartments, within a variety of HE-1.1. price ranges. Objective HE-2.1: Protect and expand the Consistent. As previously established, the proposed Project would range of housing opportunities available introduce 131 new market -rate units to the City's housing supply. As such, by location, price, and tenure to low- and Project implementation would expand the range of housing opportunities moderate -income households. available to moderate -income households. Therefore, the proposed Project is consistent with Objective HE-2.1. Public Facilities and Infrastructure Policy PF-2.2: Consider the needs of the Consistent. As established in Section 4.15, Public Services, the proposed school districts that serve Rancho Project would not exceed the currently available capacity at the schools Cucamonga in future planning and that would serve the Project site. Implementation of the proposed Project development activities. would not result the need for new or expanded school facilities, and the payment in Developer Impact Fees (RCM-PS-2) would offset a potential increase in costs to Etiwanda School District and Chaffey Joint Union High School District. Therefore, the proposed Project would be consistent with Policy PF-2.2 City = City of Rancho Cucamonga du/ac = dwelling units per acre 1=Interstate RCFPD = Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District RHNA = Regional Housing Needs Assessment SCAG = Southern California Association of Governments Zoning Ordinance. The City's Zoning Ordinance is the primary implementation tool for its General Plan Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources Element and the goals and policies therein. For this reason, the Zoning Map must be consistent with the General Plan Land Use Map. The Land Use Map indicates the general location and extent of future land use in Rancho Cucamonga. The Zoning Ordinance, which includes the Zoning Map, contains more detailed information about permitted land uses, building intensities, and required development standards. The Project site currently has the zoning designation of Community Commercial (CC) and is within the FBOD. The proposed Project involves the development of 131 for -rent residential units, 4 commercial - ready units (305 sf each), and a 1,592 sf commercial space. The net density of the proposed Project is 22.8 du/ac, which would be inconsistent with the Community Commercial (CC) zoning classifications on the Project site. However, the Project proposes to rezone the Project site to Mixed Use (MU) District, consistent with the General Plan land use designation for the site. According to Table 17.26.020-1 in the City's Municipal Code, the Mixed Use (MU) District designates areas for a mix of residential and nonresidential uses, with site development regulations that ensure development compatible with nearby lower -density residential development, as well as internal 4-78 P:\STR1901 - Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <<06/18/20» 228 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J compatibility among the varying uses. According to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code,54 the Mixed Use (MU) District allows a maximum density of 50 du/ac. Approval of the requested zone change would resolve any inconsistencies between the proposed Project and the City's Municipal Code to a less than significant level. No mitigation would be required. Parking Requirements. The proposed Project would be consistent with the City's parking requirements (refer to Section 17.64.050, Number of Parking Spaces Required, in the City's Municipal Code). The Project would require a minimum of 282 spaces, including 131 spaces that are required to be provided in the form of a garage or a carport. Required parking includes tenant and guest parking for the residential portion of the development, as well as parking for the commercial and commercial -ready units. As discussed in Section 2.6.3.2, Parking, the proposed Project would provide 134 garage parking spaces and 148 open parking spaces. Of those, 147 of the required parking spaces would be on a Southern California Gas Company easement, for which the Applicant has received an initial acceptance letter to allow parking on the easement. The Project also proposes to permit street parking on the west side of East Avenue, similar to the approved mixed -use project to the south. This would net up to 18 additional parking spaces adjacent to the commercial and commercial -ready tenant spaces. These parking spaces are not counted in the total parking count for the proposed Project, as they are not on the Project site. In summary, the proposed Project would provide 287 parking spaces, which exceeds the 282 total parking spaces required by Section 17.64.050 of the City's Municipal Code. Therefore, the proposed Project would be consistent with the parking requirements outlined in the City's Municipal Code. Summary. Approval of the requested zone change would resolve any inconsistencies between the proposed Project and the City's General Plan and Municipal Code to a less than significant level. The proposed zone change would not result in any significant environmental impacts. Therefore, the proposed Project would result in less than significant impacts related to conflicts with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect. No mitigation would be required. Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. 54 City of Rancho Cucamonga. 2019. Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. Section 17.36.020: Development Standards for Mixed Use Zoning Districts. PASTR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20)> 4-79 229 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 4.12 MINERAL RESOURCES Less than Potentially Significant with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the ❑ ❑ ❑ state? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally -important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, ❑ ❑ ❑ sDecific Dlan or other land use Dlan? Impact Analysis a) Would the project result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? In 1975, the California Legislature enacted the Surface Mining and Reclamation Act (SMARA), which, among other things, provided guidelines for the classification and designation of mineral lands. Areas are classified on the basis of geologic factors without regard to existing land use and land ownership. The areas are categorized into four Mineral Resource Zones (MRZs): • MRZ-1: An area where adequate information indicates that no significant mineral deposits are present, or where it is judged that little likelihood exists for their presence • MRZ-2: An area where adequate information indicates that significant mineral deposits are present, or where it is judged that a high likelihood exists for their presence • MRZ-3: An area containing mineral deposits, the significance of which cannot be evaluated • MRZ-4: An area where available information is inadequate for assignment to any other MRZ zone Of the four categories, lands classified as MRZ-2 are of the greatest importance. Such areas are underlain by demonstrated mineral resources or are located where geologic data indicate that significant measured or indicated resources are present. MRZ-2 areas are designated by the State of California Mining and Geology Board as being "regionally significant." Such designations require that a Lead Agency's land use decisions involving designated areas are to be made in accordance with its mineral resource management policies and that it consider the importance of the mineral resource to the region or the State as a whole, not just to the Lead Agency's jurisdiction. The Project site has been classified by the California Department of Mines and Geology (CDMG) as MRZ-3, indicating that the Project site is in an area where adequate information indicates that no 4-80 PASTR1901 - Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <<06/18/20» 230 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J significant mineral deposits are present, or where it is judged that little likelihood exists for their presence." According to Figure RC-2 of the Resource Conservation Element (2010) of the City's General Plan, several areas in Rancho Cucamonga contain regionally significant aggregate resources. The closest area to the Project site is the Lytle Creek Fan, which is estimated to contain 80,200,000 tons of aggregate. However, this area has been significantly developed and has land use designations of Low- and Medium -Density Residential and Flood Control. The Project site is approximately 2 mi southwest from this resource area. Additionally, the Project site itself is not known to have any mineral resources of significance. Therefore, no significant impacts related to the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and to the residents of the State would result from Project implementation, and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: No Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. b) Would the project result in the loss of availability of a locally -important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? As stated above, no known valuable mineral resources exist on or near the Project site. In addition, the Project site is not identified on a local General Plan, Specific Plan, or other land use plan as the location of a locally important mineral resource. Therefore, no significant impacts related to mineral resources would result from Project implementation, and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: No Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. ss California Department of Conservation. 2018. Division of Mines and Geology. Mineral Land Classification Map. Special Report 143 Plate 6.1, 1984. Website: https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/mineralresources/ #datalist (Accessed March 9, 2020). PASTR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20)> 4-81 231 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 4.13 NOISE Less than Potentially Significant with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Would the project result in: a) Generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project ® ❑ ❑ ❑ in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Generation of excessive groundborne vibration or ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ groundborne noise levels? c) For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use ❑ ❑ ® ❑ airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the protect area to excessive noise levels? Discussion This section is based on the East Avenue Noise Impact Analysis (Noise Impact Analysis) (Urban Crossroads, January 2017). This report is included in Appendix I. Technical Background The following provides an overview of the characteristics of sound and the regulatory framework that applies to noise within the vicinity of the Project site. Noise Fundamentals. Noise has been simply defined as "unwanted sound." Sound becomes unwanted when it interferes with normal activities, when it causes actual physical harm or when it has adverse effects on health. Noise is measured on a logarithmic scale of sound pressure level known as a decibel (dB). A -weighted decibels (dBA) approximate the subjective response of the human ear to broad frequency noise source by discriminating against very low and very high frequencies of the audible spectrum. They are adjusted to reflect only those frequencies which are audible to the human ear. Since the range of intensities that the human ear can detect is so large, the scale frequently used to measure intensity is a scale based on multiples of 10, the logarithmic scale. The scale for measuring intensity is the decibel scale. Each interval of 10 dB indicates a sound energy 10 times greater than before, which is perceived by the human ear as being roughly twice as loud. The most common sounds vary between 40 dBA (very quiet) and 100 dBA (very loud). Normal conversation at 3 ft is roughly 60 dBA, while loud jet engine noises equate to 110 dBA at approximately 100 ft, which can cause serious discomfort. Another important aspect of noise is the duration of the sound and the way it is described and distributed in time. Environmental noise descriptors are generally based on averages, rather than instantaneous, noise levels. The most commonly used figure is the equivalent continuous sound level (Leq). Equivalent 4-82 PASTR1901 - Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <<06/18/20» 232 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J sound levels are not measured directly but are calculated from sound pressure levels typically measured in A -weighted decibels. The Leq represents a steady-state sound level containing the same total energy as a time -varying signal over a given sample period and is commonly used to describe the "average" noise levels within the environment. Peak -hour or average noise levels, while useful, do not completely describe a given noise environment. Noise levels lower than peak hour may be disturbing if they occur during times when quiet is most desirable, namely evening and nighttime (sleeping) hours. To account for this, the day - night average noise level (Ldn) and the Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL), representing a composite 24-hour noise level, are utilized. The Ldn and CNEL are weighted averages of the intensity of a sound, with corrections for time of day, and are averaged over 24 hours. The Ldn time -of -day corrections include the addition of 10 dB to dBA Leq sound levels at night between 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. The CNEL time -of -day corrections require the addition of 5 dB to dBA Leq sound levels in the evening from 7:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. in addition to the corrections for the Ldn. These additions are made to account for the noise -sensitive time periods during the evening and nighttime hours when sound appears louder. Ldn and CNEL do not represent the actual sound level heard at any time, but rather represent the total sound exposure. The City relies on the 24-hour Lan level to assess land use compatibility with transportation -related noise sources; however, this analysis uses the CNEL noise level to apply the more conservative evening hour corrections to the 24-hour noise levels. Community responses to noise may range from registering a complaint by telephone or letter to initiating court action, depending upon everyone's susceptibility to and personal attitudes about noise. Several factors are related to the level of community annoyance, including: • Fear associated with noise -producing activities; • Socioeconomic status and education level; • Perception that those affected are being unfairly treated; • Attitudes regarding the usefulness of the noise -producing activity; • Belief that the noise source can be controlled. Approximately 10 percent of the population has a very low tolerance for noise and will object to any noise not of their making. Consequently, even in the quietest environment, some complaints will occur. Another 25 percent of the population will not complain even in very severe noise environments. Thus, a variety of reactions can be expected from people exposed to any given noise environment. Surveys have shown that about 10 percent of the people exposed to traffic noise of 60 dBA will report being highly annoyed with the noise, and each increase of 1 dBA is associated with approximately 2 percent more people being highly annoyed. When traffic noise exceeds 60 dBA or aircraft noise exceeds 55 dBA, people may begin to complain. An increase or decrease of 1 dBA cannot be perceived except in carefully controlled laboratory experiments, a change of 3 dBA is considered barely perceptible, and changes of 5 dBA are considered readily perceptible. Vibration Fundamentals. Per the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Transit Noise Impact and Vibration Assessment, vibration is the periodic oscillation of a medium or object. The rumbling sound caused by the vibration of room surfaces is called structure -borne noise. Sources of ground - borne vibrations include natural phenomena (e.g., earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, sea waves, landslides) or human -made causes (e.g., explosions, machinery, traffic, trains, construction PASTR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20)> 4-83 233 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 equipment). Vibration sources may be continuous, such as factory machinery, or transient, such as explosions. As is the case with airborne sound, amplitude and frequency may describe ground -borne vibrations. Several different methods are used to quantify vibration. The peak particle velocity (PPV) is defined as the maximum instantaneous peak of the vibration signal. The PPV is most frequently used to describe vibration impacts to buildings, but it is not always suitable for evaluating human response (annoyance) because it takes some time for the human body to respond to vibration signals. Instead, the human body responds to average vibration amplitude often described as the root - mean -square (RMS). The RMS amplitude is defined as the average of the squared amplitude of the signal and is most frequently used to describe the effect of vibration on the human body. Decibel notation (VdB) is commonly used to measure RMS. Decibel notation (VdB) serves to reduce the range of numbers used to describe human response to vibration. Typically, ground -borne vibration generated by man-made activities attenuates rapidly with distance from the source of the vibration. Sensitive receivers for vibration include structures (especially older masonry structures), people (especially residents, the elderly, and sick), and vibration -sensitive equipment. The background vibration -velocity level in residential areas is generally 50 VdB. Ground -borne vibration is normally perceptible to humans at approximately 65 VdB. For most people, a vibration - velocity level of 75 VdB is the approximate dividing line between barely perceptible and distinctly perceptible levels. Typical outdoor sources of perceptible ground -borne vibration are construction equipment, steel -wheeled trains, and traffic on rough roads. If a roadway is smooth, the ground - borne vibration is rarely perceptible. The range of interest is from approximately 50 VdB, which is the typical background vibration -velocity level, to 100 VdB, which is the general threshold where minor damage can occur in fragile buildings. Significance Criteria. Based on the significance of noise impacts outlined below in Table 4.13.A, noise impacts shall be considered significant if any of the following occur as a direct result of the proposed development. Table 4.13.A: Significance Criteria Summary Analysis Condition(s) Significance Criteria Daytime I Nighttime On Site Traffic Noisel Exterior Noise Level Criteria 70 dBA CNEL conditionally acceptable Interior Noise Level Criteria 45 dBA CNEL Construction Noise and Vibration Permitted hours of 7:00 a.m.-8:00 p.m. on weekdays, including Saturdays, with no activity allowed on Sundays and holidays.2 Noise Level Threshold 65 dBA Leq N/A Vibration Level Threshold 0.12 in/sec RMS N/A 1 Source: City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Public Health and Safety Element, Figure PS-8. 2 Source: City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code, Section 17.66.050(D)(4) (Appendix 3.1). 3 Source: City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code, Section 17.66.070 (Appendix 3.1). "Daytime" = 7:00 a.m.-10:00 p.m.; "Nighttime"" = 10:00 p.m.-7:00 a.m.; "N/A" = No nighttime construction activity is permitted and, therefore, no nighttime construction noise level threshold is identified. CNEL = Community Noise Equivalent Level Leq = equivalent continuous sound level dBA = A -weighted decibel(s) RMS = root -mean -square in/sec = inch(es) per second 4-84 P:\STR1901 - Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <<06/18/20» 234 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J On -Site Traffic Noise. • If the on -site exterior noise levels exceed 70 dBA CNEL at the multifamily residential use and the interior noise levels exceed 45 dBA CNEL (City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Public Health & Safety Element, Figure PS-8). Construction Noise and Vibration. • If Project -related construction activities occur at any time other than the permitted hours of 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. on weekdays, including Saturdays, with no activity allowed on Sundays and holidays and generate noise levels that exceed the 65 dBA Leq noise level limit at adjacent sensitive residential land uses (City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code, Section 17.66.050 (D) (4)); • If short-term Project -generated construction vibration levels exceed the City of Rancho Cucamonga acceptable vibration standard of 0.12 inch per second (in/sec) RMS at sensitive receiver locations (City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code, Section 17.66.070). Existing Noise Environment. To assess the existing noise level environment, five 24-hour noise level measurements were taken at sensitive receiver locations in the Project study area. The receiver locations were selected to describe and document the existing noise environment within the Project study area. Figure 4.13.1, Noise Measurement Locations, provides the boundaries of the Project study area and the noise level measurement locations. To fully describe the existing noise conditions, noise level measurements were collected on Wednesday, December 14, 2016, as part of the Noise Impact Analysis by Urban Crossroads Inc. (January 2017). Long -Term Noise Measurement Results. The noise measurements presented below focus on the average or equivalent sound levels (Leq). The Leq represents a steady-state sound level containing the same total energy as a time -varying signal over a given sample period. The daily noise level at each location is also provided below in Table 4.13.13. CVWD Well Site and Metropolitan Water District of Southern California Construction Activities. Located adjacent to the Project's southwestern site boundaries, the CVWD well site includes a well pump and enclosed electrical equipment. While an existing 6 ft high perimeter wall surrounds the well site, the well pump itself is taller than the wall and therefore represents a potential unmitigated noise source adjacent to the Project. Measurement locations L3 and L4 were chosen to describe the existing noise levels due to the operation of the well pump. Based on these measurement locations, the noise levels are shown to range from 59.0 to 61.3 dBALeq during daytime hours and from 58.8 to 61.6 dBA Leq during nighttime hours. The exterior noise levels represent those typical of a residential neighborhood during daytime hours, with slightly higher noise levels during nighttime hours, likely due to the operation of the well pump, background construction activities, and traffic noise levels from Foothill Boulevard and East Avenue. PASTR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20)> 4-85 235 MWD onsrruction Activity Woter of Life Church Parking -01 Q SITE I � I i oi0 ��'� °•jam` r Source: Esri, DigitalGiobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNESJAirbRS'D''"SDA, USGS,--� W Ae-GRID 1GN,nad the 615 Use Coma�{y LEGEND: Noise Measurement Locations L SA FIGURE 4.13.1 N Westbury Residential Project SOURCE: Urban Crossroads Noise Measurement Locations I:\STR1901\G\Noise Measurement Locations.cdr (7/1/2019) 236 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C A JUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J `L` This page intentionally left blank P:\STR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean. docx a06/18/20» 4.87 237 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 Table 4.13.B: 24-Hour Ambient Noise Level Measurements Distance to Energy Average Hourly Project Boundary Noise Level (dBA Leq)z Daytime Nighttime Location' (feet) Description CNEL L1 445 Located north of the Project site and adjacent 57.2 57.8 64.4 to an existing 6-foot-high barrier at existing residential homes on Garcia Road. L2 90 Located east of the Project site and adjacent to 63.7 61.7 68.7 a 6-foot-high barrier at existing residential homes on East Avenue. L3 0 Located within the Project site and north of an 61.3 61.6 68.2 existing well pump. L4 35 Located south of the Project site and east of an 59.0 58.8 65.5 existing well pump. L5 660 Located south of the Project site, across Foothill 66.3 63.7 71.0 Boulevard, and adjacent to existing residential homes. See Exhibit 4.13.1 for the noise level measurement locations. Z Energy (logarithmic) average hourly levels. "Daytime" = 7:00 a.m.-10:00 p.m.; "Nighttime" = 10:00 p.m.-7:00 a.m. CNEL = Community Noise Equivalent Level dBA = A -weighted decibel(s) Leq = equivalent continuous sound level While the exterior noise levels adjacent to the well site are generally consistent with those of typical residential areas, some single -event noise levels may be heard at the Project site when the well pump equipment cycles on and off. Impact Analysis a) Would the project result in generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? Short -Term Construction -Related Noise Impacts. Noise generated by the Project construction equipment will include a combination of trucks, power tools, concrete mixers, and portable generators that, when combined, can reach high levels. This construction noise analysis was prepared using reference noise level measurements taken by Urban Crossroads, Inc., to describe the typical construction activity noise levels for residential construction. Noise levels generated by heavy construction equipment can range from approximately 62 dBA to in excess of 80 dBA when measured at 50 ft. However, these noise levels diminish with distance from the construction site at a rate of 6 dBA per doubling of distance. For example, a noise level of 80 dBA measured at 50 ft from the noise source to the receiver would be reduced to 74 dBA at 100 ft from the source to the receiver, and would be further reduced to 68 dBA at 200 ft from the source to the receiver. Based on the reference construction noise levels, the Project -related construction noise levels when the peak reference noise level is operating at a single point nearest the sensitive receiver location from the center of construction activity will range from 52.8 to 67.7 dBA Leq at the sensitive receiver locations in Rancho Cucamonga. Construction noise impacts would remain below the 65 dBA Leq 4-88 P:\STR1901 - Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <<06/18/20» 238 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J construction noise level threshold at all receptors surrounding the site except at the vacant lot immediately south of the Project, which is proposed to contain residential uses. Therefore, temporary construction noise mitigation barriers are required at the construction boundaries near the impacted receiver locations where Project construction noise levels could potentially exceed the noise level thresholds. The construction noise analysis presents a conservative, worst -case approach with the highest noise -level -producing equipment for each stage of Project construction operating at the closest point from the center of construction activity to the nearby sensitive receiver locations. This scenario is unlikely to occur during typical construction activities and likely overstates the construction noise levels that will be experienced at each receiver location. With the installation of temporary exterior noise control barriers at the minimum height of 9 ft, a reduction of 8.5 dBA would occur, reducing noise levels to 59.2 dBA Leq. It is important to note that the temporary construction noise barrier is only necessary if the residential uses immediately to the south of the Project are fully constructed and occupied at the time of Project construction. Long -Term On -Site Traffic Noise Impacts. It is expected that the primary source of noise impacts to the Project site will be traffic noise from Foothill Boulevard and East Avenue. The Project will also experience some background traffic noise impacts from the Project's internal parking lot; however, due to the low traffic volume/speeds, traffic noise from the parking areas will not make a significant contribution to the noise environment. Exterior Noise Analysis. Using the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Highway Traffic Noise Prediction Model (FHWA RD-77-108) and the parameters outlined in Section 6 of the Noise Impact Analysis, the expected future exterior noise levels for the on -site building were calculated. The on -site traffic noise level impacts indicate that the units facing Foothill Boulevard and East Avenue will experience unmitigated exterior noise levels ranging from 58.9 to 70.5 dBA CNEL. With unmitigated exterior traffic noise levels approaching 70.5 dBA CNEL at buildings facing East Avenue, the Project's multifamily residential land use is considered normally unacceptable land use, requiring a detailed analysis of the interior noise reduction requirements needed to satisfy the interior noise level standard of 45 dBA CNEL. Since there are no outdoor living areas requiring exterior noise mitigation at the buildings facing East Avenue, no exterior noise mitigation is required. Interior Noise Analysis. To provide the necessary interior noise level reduction, the Noise Impact Analysis indicates that residential buildings facing Foothill Boulevard and East Avenue will require a windows -closed condition and a means of mechanical ventilation (e.g., air conditioning). The future unmitigated noise levels at the first -floor building fagade are expected to range from 58.9 to 70.5 dBA CNEL. The first -floor interior noise level analysis shows that the City's 45 dBA CNEL interior noise level standard can be satisfied using upgraded windows with a minimum Sound Transmission Class (STC) rating of 29 for buildings adjacent to East Avenue and standard windows with a minimum STC rating of 27 for all other buildings. The future noise levels at the second- and third -floor building facades are expected to range from 58.9 to 70.4 dBA CNEL. Upgraded windows with a minimum STC rating of 29 for buildings adjacent PASTR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20)> 4-89 239 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION JUNE 2020 to East Avenue and standard windows with a minimum STC rating of 27 for all other buildings are required to satisfy the City's 45 dBA CNEL interior noise level standard. The interior noise analysis shows that with the recommended interior noise mitigation measures described in N0I-2, the Project will satisfy the City's 45 dBA CNEL interior noise level standards for residential development. Significance Determination: Potentially Significant Impact. Mitigation Measures: N0I-1 Construction Noise and Vibration: Prior to issuance of building permits, the Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) Planning Department, or designee, shall verify that grading and construction plans include the following requirements: • If the future residential land use immediately south of the Project site is fully built and occupied at the time of Project construction, install minimum 9-foot- high temporary construction noise barriers at the Project's southern site boundary for the duration of mobile -equipment construction activities. The noise control barriers must present a solid face from top to bottom. The noise control barriers must meet the minimum height and be constructed as follows: o The barriers shall provide a minimum transmission loss of 20 A -weighted decibels (dBA). The noise barrier shall be constructed using an acoustical blanket (e.g., vinyl acoustic curtains or quilted blankets) attached to the construction site perimeter fence or equivalent temporary fence posts. o The noise barrier must be maintained and any damage promptly repaired. Gaps, holes, or weaknesses in the barrier or openings between the barrier and the ground shall be promptly repaired. o The noise control barrier and associated elements shall be completely removed and the site appropriately restored upon conclusion of the construction activity. • Prior to approval of grading plans and/or issuance of building permits, plans shall include a note indicating that noise -generating Project construction activities shall only occur between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. on weekdays, including on Saturdays, with no activity allowed on Sundays and holidays. • During all Project site construction, the construction contractors shall equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly operating and maintained mufflers, consistent with manufacturers' standards. The construction contractor shall place all stationary construction equipment so that 4-90 PASTR1901 - Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <<06/18/20» 240 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION DUNE 2020 W ESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J emitted noise is directed away from the noise -sensitive receptors nearest the Project site. • The construction contractor shall locate equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction -related noise sources and noise -sensitive receivers nearest the Project site (i.e., to the center) during all Project construction. • The construction contractor shall limit haul truck deliveries to the same hours specified for construction equipment (between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. on weekdays, including on Saturdays, with no activity allowed on Sundays and holidays). The contractor shall prepare a haul route exhibit and shall design delivery routes to minimize the exposure of sensitive land uses or residential dwellings to delivery truck -related noise. N0I-2 Interior Noise Mitigation: To satisfy the City's 45 dBA Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) interior noise level criteria, units facing Foothill Boulevard and East Avenue will require a noise reduction of up to 25.5 dBA and a windows -closed condition requiring a means of mechanical ventilation (e.g., air conditioning). To meet the City's 45 dBA CNEL interior noise standards, the Project shall provide the following or equivalent noise mitigation measures: • Windows: o All windows and sliding glass doors shall be well -fitted, well -weather- stripped assemblies and shall have the following minimum sound transmission class (STC) ratings: ■ Windows facing East Avenue in Buildings 1, 2, 3, and 10 require upgraded windows with a minimum STC rating of 29. ■ All other buildings require standard windows with minimum STC ratings of 27. • Doors: All exterior doors shall be well -weather-stripped, solid -core assemblies at least 1.75 inches thick. • Walls: At any penetrations of exterior walls by pipes, ducts, or conduits, the space between the wall and pipes, ducts, or conduits shall be caulked or filled with mortar to form an airtightseal. • Roof: Roof sheathing of wood construction shall be well -fitted or caulked plywood of at least 0.5 inch thick. Ceilings shall be well -fitted, fully sealed gypsum board of at least 0.5 inch thick. Insulation with at least a rating of R-19 shall be used in the attic space. PASTR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20)> 4-91 241 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 • Ventilation: Arrangements for any habitable room shall be such that any exterior door or window can be kept closed when the room is in use and still receive circulated air. A forced air circulation system (e.g., air conditioning) or active ventilation system (e.g., fresh air supply) shall be provided that satisfies the requirements of the Uniform Building Code. • Notices: Occupancy disclosure notices are recommended for all future tenants of the residential units within the Project site. The disclosure notices should state that the units may be exposed to infrequent noise events from the adjacent Cucamonga Valley Water District well site. Level of Significance after Mitigation: Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. b) Would the project result in generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? Construction activity can result in varying degrees of ground vibration, depending on the equipment and methods used, distance to the affected structures, and soil type. It is expected that ground - borne vibration from Project construction activities would cause only intermittent, localized intrusion. The proposed Project's construction activities most likely to cause vibration impacts are: • Heavy Construction Equipment: Although all heavy mobile construction equipment has the potential to cause at least some perceptible vibration while operating close to a building, the vibration is usually short-term and not of sufficient magnitude to cause building damage. It is not expected that heavy equipment such as large bulldozers would operate close enough to any residences to cause a vibration impact. • Trucks: Trucks hauling building materials to construction sites can be sources of vibration intrusion if the haul routes pass through residential neighborhoods on streets with bumps or potholes. Repairing the bumps and potholes generally eliminates the problem. Ground -borne vibration levels resulting from construction activities occurring within the Project site were estimated by data published by the FTA. Construction activities that would have the potential to generate low levels of ground -borne vibration within the Project site include grading. Using the vibration source level of construction equipment and the construction vibration assessment methodology published by the FTA, it is possible to estimate the Project vibration impacts. Based on the reference vibration levels provided by the FTA, a large bulldozer represents the peak source of vibration, with a reference velocity of 0.089 in/sec PPV at 25 feet. At distances ranging from 112 to 545 ft from Project construction activities, construction vibration velocity levels are expected to approach 0.0094 in/sec PPV. To assess the human perception of vibration levels in PPV, the velocities are converted to RMS vibration levels based on the Caltrans Transportation and Construction Vibration Guidance Manual conversion factor of 0.71. The highest construction vibration levels in RMS are expected to approach 0.007 in/sec RMS at receiver location R5. Based on the City's vibration standards, the proposed Project construction activities will satisfy the vibration standard of 0.12 in/sec RMS at all receiver locations during Project construction. Further, Section 4-92 PASTR1901 - Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <<06/18/20» 242 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J 17.66.070 (D) of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code exempts the equipment specific to temporary construction, demolition, and vehicles that leave a Project site from the vibration level standards. The vibration impacts due to Project construction represent temporary perceptible vibration levels that may cause annoyance in residential areas; however, they do not represent vibration levels capable of causing building damage to nearby residential homes. The FTA identifies construction vibration levels capable of building damage as ranging from 0.12 to 0.5 in/sec PPV. The peak Project - construction vibration levels, approaching 0.009 in/sec PPV, will not exceed the FTA vibration levels for building damage at the residential uses near the Project site. Further, the impacts at the site of the closest sensitive receivers are unlikely to be sustained during the entire construction period, but would occur rather only during the times that heavy construction equipment is operating adjacent to the Project site perimeter. Construction at the Project site would be restricted to daytime hours, consistent with City requirements, thereby eliminating potential vibration impacts during the sensitive nighttime hours. Therefore, the Project -related vibration impacts would result in a less than significant impact during the worst -case construction activities at the Project site boundary. Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. c) For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? The Project is approximately 6 mi northeast of LA/Ontario International Airport and is not in close proximity to a private airstrip; therefore, the noise -related impact due to airport activities would be less than significant and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. PASTR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20)> 4-93 243 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 4.14 POPULATION AND HOUSING Less than Potentially Significant with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Would the project: a) Induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ elsewhere? Impact Analysis a) Would the project induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? The proposed Project includes the development of a gated residential community consisting of 131 for -rent residential units (73 one -bedroom and 58 two -bedroom floor plans), 4 commercial - ready units, and 1,592 sf of commercial space. The Project would have a net density of 22.8 du/ac and would provide approximately 116,155 sf of leasable dwelling space (including commercial space attached to select residential units) and 39,467 sf of shared recreational area. Because the existing use of the Project site is not residential, the proposed Project would result in a net increase of 131 residential units in Rancho Cucamonga, which may slightly increase the residential population in the city. According to the California Department of Finance City/Population and Housing Estimates (January 1, 2019),56 the average number of persons per dwelling unit in Rancho Cucamonga in 2019 was 3.09 persons. Based on the City's average occupancy rate of 3.09 persons per unit, the proposed Project would introduce 404 persons into the Project area. " The introduction of approximately 404 new residents would be approximately 0.2 percent of the city's population of 174,573 in 2017,5' and 0.2 percent of the city's projected population of 173,900 in 2020.59 The assumption of 404 new residents is a conservative estimate that assumes all of the occupants of the new residences provided by the Project are new residents to the city and does not account for a scenario in which some existing residents of the city relocate to the proposed residential units. The increase in population resulting from the proposed Project is not considered significant because it comprises only a small portion (less than 1 percent) of the total population of Rancho Cucamonga and does not represent a substantial increase in population. 56 California Department of Finance. 2019. E-5 Population and Housing Estimates for Cities, Counties, and the State, 2011-2019 with 2010 Census Benchmark City/County Population and Housing Estimates. May. S7 131 du x 3.09 persons/du = 403.48, or 404 persons 58 United States Census Bureau. 2013-2017 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates, Table DP05. 4-94 PASTR1901 - Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <<06/18/20» 244 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J In addition, the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) Allocation Plan, mandated by the California State Housing Element law as part of the process of updating local housing elements of the General Plan, has quantified a range of housing needs by income groups for each jurisdiction during specific planning periods. According to the City's 2010 General Plan Housing Element, SCAG has established a RHNA goal for the City to develop 848 new housing units by the year 2021. Of these 848 units, 209 would be set aside for Very Low -Income groups, 141 for Low -Income groups, 158 for Moderate -Income groups, and 340 for Above -Moderate -Income groups. The proposed Project would develop the Project site with 131 new market -rate housing units, which would help to meet the City's current housing needs and RHNA goal. Additionally, the proposed Project is surrounded by urban uses to the north, south, and west, including single-family residential uses and a utility corridor containing a CVWD pumping station adjacent to the southern boundary of the Project site. While the Project would include infrastructure improvements (such as utility connections to the existing undeveloped site) to serve the proposed mixed -use development, the Project does not propose to expand surrounding utility infrastructure in the Project vicinity, nor does the Project include roadway expansions that would indirectly induce growth. For the reasons stated above, the proposed Project would not result in substantial unplanned growth, nor would the Project directly or indirectly induce population growth through the extension of roads or other infrastructure. Therefore, potential impacts related to substantial inducement of population growth would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. b) Would the project displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? The Project site is currently vacant and undeveloped. No housing currently exists on the Project site, and housing displacement would not occur as a result of Project implementation. Because the Project site does not currently contain any permanent occupants, no people would be displaced as a result of the development of the proposed Project. Therefore, the proposed Project would not displace substantial numbers of people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere, and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: No Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. PASTR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20)> 4-95 245 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 4.15 PUBLIC SERVICES Less than Potentially Significant with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Would the project: a) Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: i. Fire protection? ❑ ❑ ® ❑ ii. Police protection? ❑ ❑ ® ❑ iii. Schools? ❑ ❑ ® ❑ iv. Parks? ❑ ❑ ® ❑ v. Other public facilities? ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Impact Analysis a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered government facilities, or the need for new or physically altered government facilities, the construction of which would cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for: This section is, in part, based on information solicited through written correspondence with public service providers. Written responses from public service providers is provided in Appendix K. i Fire protection? The RCFPD provides a wide array of services to the community, including emergency medical services, structure fire protection, fire suppression and prevention, response to hazardous and toxic material release, and technical rescue. The RCFPD operates seven fire stations and employs 120 full - and part-time RCFPD employees to serve nearly 170,000 residents in a 50-square-mile area, which includes all of Rancho Cucamonga and 10 square miles of unincorporated land adjacent to the San Bernardino National Forest.6o Fire Station No. 173 is the closest fire station to the proposed Project site and is located at 12270 Fire House Court, Rancho Cucamonga. The Project site, which itself is located northwest of the West Foothill Boulevard/East Avenue intersection, is approximately 1.63 mi southeast of Fire Station No. 173. Fire Station No. 173 would be the first to the Project site in the event of an emergency and would therefore be the "first -in" station. Fire Station No. 173 has a dedicated Hazardous Materials Team. This specialized team is trained in both biological and chemical hazardous materials 60 Written correspondence with Robert Ball, Fire Marshall, RCFPD. June 18, 2019. 4-96 PASTR1901 - Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <<06/18/20» 246 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J emergency response. RCFPD provides rapid response and assessment of life threatening situations and has an Emergency Medical Services (EMS) program, which consists of certified paramedics who provide Advanced Life Support (ALS) services. The RCFPD employs 112 full-time employees and 8 part-time employees.61 In 2018, the RCFPD responded to approximately 16,650 incidents. Of these, approximately 75 percent of the incidents were for EMS, 12 percent were for fire, and 13 percent were for other purposes (e.g., hazardous materials response, water salvages, and public service requests).62 The RCFPD has a response time goal of 4 minutes to any location within the Fire District. Travel time is defined as the time from when the dispatched crew leaves the station until they arrive at the address of the emergenCy. 63 The RCFPD plans to relocate Station No. 172 to a location approximately 1 mi west of its current location. The RCFPD also plans to construct an eighth station, Station No. 178, at approximately Haven Avenue and Town Center Drive. According to the RCFPD, these expansions/relocations were developed independently of the proposed Project and are not necessitated as a result of the proposed Project.64 According to the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE) Resource Assessment Program, the Project site is not within a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone (VHFHSZ).61 Emergency access to the Project site would be provided via two driveways off East Avenue. As discussed in Section 4.17, Transportation, the proposed Project would not result in a substantial increase in traffic congestion or significant impacts at local intersections that would delay emergency vehicles. Therefore, the proposed Project would not impair emergency response vehicles or increase response times. As discussed in Section 4.14, Population and Housing, the proposed Project would result in an increase of 131 residential units, which would add approximately 404 new residents and increase the number of on -site visitors and personnel. Construction and operation of the proposed Project may result in increased demand for fire protection services, but it would not trigger the need for new or altered facilities. Based on consultation with the RCFPD, the proposed Project can be adequately served by existing fire stations, and no new or altered facilities are needed to serve the uses that would be allowed by the Project.66 Consequently, RCFPD would be able to maintain current levels of service provided to Rancho Cucamonga, including the Project site, following Project implementation. Moreover, all development within the Project area would be reviewed by the RCFPD for compliance with the applicable provisions of the California Fire and Residential Codes along with the requirements of the RCFPD's Standards and Guidance documents, including, but not limited to, requirements for fire apparatus access roads, gates, address and building signage, Knox boxes, fire protection water supply systems, and site plan criteria. Therefore, potential impacts 61 City of Rancho Cucamonga. 2010i. Overview of Departmental Operating Budgets. 62 Written correspondence with Robert Ball, Fire Marshall, RCFPD. June 18, 2019. 63 Ibid. 64 Ibid. 65 CAL FIRE. 2012. FHSZ Viewer. Website: https:Hegis.fire.ca.gov/FHSZ/ (accessed June 22, 2019). 66 Written correspondence with Robert Ball, Fire Marshall, RCFPD. June 18, 2019. PASTR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20)> 4_97 247 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 related to fire protection services would be less than significant, and no mitigation would be required. Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered government facilities, or the need for new or physically altered government facilities, the construction of which would cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for: ii Police protection? The City contracts with the County of San Bernardino Sheriff's Department (SBSD) for police protection services. The SBSD has one station within Rancho Cucamonga, located at 10510 Civic Center Drive, approximately 3.45 mi southwest of the Project site, and a Sheriff's substation at Victoria Gardens, approximately 0.93 mi west of the Project site. The SBSD's Rancho Cucamonga Patrol Station is responsible for providing law enforcement to 40 square miles. Police service needs are determined by performing periodic analysis of various factors, including officer -per -capita ratio, number of calls for service, and officer unstructured time. The Rancho Cucamonga Patrol Station's SBSD staffing level in 2018 was 141 sworn officers, 41 nonsworn officers/general employees, and 90 volunteers.67 The City has established a goal of providing approximately one officer for every 1,080 residents.68 According to the SBSD's 2018 statistics, the current staffing ratio is 0.61 deputy per 1,000 residents.69 As such, the City's goal standard is not currently being met. The SBSD's performance standard is a response time of 4 minutes and 16 seconds or less for emergency calls. According to the SBSD, the Rancho Cucamonga Patrol Station's actual average emergency response time is 1 minute and 42 seconds.70 As previously stated in Section 4.14, Population and Housing, the proposed Project would increase Rancho Cucamonga's population by approximately 404 residents. The proposed Project would incrementally contribute to demand for additional police protection services. When considered with the existing (2018) population of 177,751 residents and the current SBSD staffing level of 0.61 deputy per 1,000 residents, the Project -related population increase's impact on the SBSD's ratio of police officers per resident would be minimal (0.4 officer).71 Therefore, the increase in population associated with the proposed Project would be minimal compared to the number of police officers 67 Written correspondence with Casey Jiles, Lieutenant, SBSD, Rancho Cucamonga Station. June 27, 2019. 68 City of Rancho Cucamonga. 2010c. General Plan EIR. 69 Written correspondence with Casey Jiles, Lieutenant, SBSD, Rancho Cucamonga Station. June 27, 2019. 70 Ibid. 71 177,751 (2018 population) / 1,080 residents = 164.5 officers needed to meet City's goal ratio. 177,751 (2018 population) + 404 Project -related increase in residents = 178,155 / 1,080 residents = 164.9 officers needed to meet ratio. 164.9 — 164.5 = 0.4 additional officer. 4-98 PASTR1901 - Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <<06/18/20» 248 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J currently employed by the City and would not trigger the need for new or physically altered police facilities. The SBSD is currently in the process of developing a West Side Public Safety Substation approximately 5.7 mi west of the Project site, near the intersection of Vineyard Avenue and San Bernardino Road. This substation is anticipated to be completed in the summer of 2020. In addition, the City requires payment of an in -lieu fee to prevent new residential and nonresidential development from reducing the quality and availability of public services provided to residents of Rancho Cucamonga by requiring new residential development to contribute to the cost of expanding the availability of police assets in Rancho Cucamonga.72 Payment of these in -lieu fees, as required by RCM-PS-1, would serve to reduce Project -related impacts to police protection to a less than significant level. Therefore, impacts to police services would be less than significant, and no mitigation would be required. Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Regulatory Compliance Measures and Mitigation Measures. No mitigation is required; however, the proposed Project would be required to comply with the City's Municipal Code, Section 3.64, Police Impact Fee, as detailed below. RCM-PS-1 Payment of Police Impact Fee. Prior to issuance of building permits, the Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department, or designee, shall confirm that the Project Applicant/Developer has paid all required Police Impact Fees in accordance with Section 3.64, Police Impact Fee, of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered government facilities, or the need for new or physically altered government facilities, the construction of which would cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for: iii Schools? The Project site is located within the jurisdictional boundaries of two school districts: Etiwanda School District (ESD) for elementary and intermediate school73 and Chaffey Joint Union High School District (CJUHSD) for high school.74 Etiwanda School District. The ESD currently serves students in grades kindergarten through 8. The ESD operates 20 schools/programs, including 13 elementary schools, 4 intermediate schools, and 3 alternative education programs. The Project site is assigned to West Heritage Elementary School (approximately 0.5 mi northeast of the Project site in Fontana) and Heritage Intermediate School 72 City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, Section 3.64, Police Impact Fee. 73 Etiwanda School District. 2017. Attendance Boundaries Effective July 1, 2017. 74 Chaff ey Joint Union High School District. 2011. Boundary Map. PASTR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20)> 4-99 249 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 (approximately 1 mi northeast of the Project site in Fontana).75 The current enrollment and capacity of these schools is shown below in Table 4.14.A. Table 4.14.A: Etiwanda School District Capacities and Enrollment School/Location Grade Current Capacity Current Enrollment Remaining Capacity West Heritage School K-5 874 684 190 13690 West Constitution Way, Fontana Heritage Intermediate 6-8 1,536 1,250 286 137665outh Heritage Circle, Fontana Source: Written correspondence with Pam Polchow, Administrative Assistant Il, Business Services, Etiwanda School District, on June 13, 2019, and June 18, 2019. Chaffey Joint Union High School District. The CJUHSD currently serves approximately 25,000 students in grades 9 through 12. The CJUHSD operates 12 schools/programs: 8 high schools and 4 alternative education schools (e.g., adult schools, continuing education, a community day school, and an online school).76 Etiwanda High School would serve as the school of attendance for residents of the proposed Project." The current enrollment and capacity of the schools nearest to the Project site is shown in Table 4.14.A, School Capacities and Enrollment. CJUHSD student generation rates for single-family attached residential units were used to analyze the estimated students generated as a result of Project implementation. Based on these generation factors, it is assumed that the 131 residential units proposed would generate approximately 35 high school students (refer to Table 4.14.D, CJUHSD Projected School Enrollments). The Project -related increase in students projected as a result of Project implementation would incrementally increase the demand for school facilities. However, as illustrated by Tables 3.14.A through 3.14.D, the existing elementary, middle, and high schools serving the Project site would have sufficient capacity to serve the Project -related increase in schoolchildren. Furthermore, written correspondence with ESD and CJUHSD confirmed that the districts are not planning to construct new schools to serve the area because there is not currently a need for an additional school in the area and implementation of the Project would not generate such a need for additional facilities.'$ 75 Source: Written correspondence with Pam Polchow, Administrative Assistant II, Business Services, ESD, on June 13, 2019, and June 18, 2019. 76 Chaffey Joint Union High School District. 2018. About the District. 77 Written correspondence with Mike Harrison, Director of Operations, Planning and Facilities, CJUHSD, June 19, 2019. 78 Written correspondence with Pam Polchow, Administrative Assistant II, Business Services, ESD, June 13, 2019, and phone conversation with Mike Harrison, Director of Operations, Planning and Facilities, CJUHSD, June 19, 2018. 4-100 P:\STR1901 - Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <<06/18/20» 250 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J Table 4.14.13: Etiwanda School District Projected Enrollment Grade Levels Student Generation Factor Projected Enrollment Elementary School 0.3033 student/unit 39.7 students Intermediate School 0.1286 student/unit 16.8 students Total Students (rounded to whole number) 57 Source: Written correspondence with Pam Polchow, Administrative Assistant II, Business Services, Etiwanda School District, on June 13, 2019. 1 Current enrollment includes the number of students actually attending the school in 2017-2018. 2 Current capacity includes the school's current operating capacity or the number of students the school can serve while operating during the current calendar year. Table 4.14.C: CJUHSD School Capacities and Enrollment School Grade Current Capacityz Current Enrollment Under Capacity Etiwanda High School 13500 Victoria Avenue 9-12 4,1243 3,497 628 Source: Phone conversation with Mike Harrison, Director of Operations, Planning and Facilities, CJUHSD, June 19, 2019. 1 Current enrollment includes the number of students actually attending the school in 2017-2018. 2 Current capacity includes the school's current operating capacity or the number of students the school can serve while operating during the current calendar year. 3 The 2017-2018 capacity was approximately 3,580. Etiwanda High School is currently constructing 16 new classrooms, which will be complete and in use by January 2020. These plans are independent of the proposed Project. CJUHSD maintains a standard of 34 students per classroom. These new classrooms will increase Etiwanda High School's capacity by 544 students by the time the proposed Project is developed. Per a phone conversation on June 19, 2019, with Mike Harrison, Director of Operations, Planning and Facilities for CJUHSD, this environmental analysis should consider the 2017-2018 capacity plus facilities expansion for this environmental analysis. Without the additional classrooms, Etiwanda High School would still be under capacity by 83. CJUHSD = Chaffey Joint Union High School District Table 4.14.D: CJUHSD Projected School Enrollment Grade Levels Student Generation Factor Projected Enrollment High School 0.2626 students 34.4 students Total Students (rounded to whole number) 35.0 students Source: CJUHSD, Developer Fee Justification Study. 2008. Note: The Projected enrollment is based on the proposed Project size of 131 multifamily residential units. CJUHSD = Chaffey Joint Union High School District Summary. Pursuant to California Education Code Section 17620(a)(1), the governing board of any school district is authorized to levy a fee, charge, dedication, or other requirement against any construction within the boundaries of the district for the purpose of funding the construction or reconstruction of school facilities. The Project Applicant would be required to pay such fees to reduce any Project -related impacts on school services as provided in Section 65995 of the California Government Code. Pursuant to the provisions of Government Code Section 65996, a project's impact on school facilities is fully mitigated through payment of the requisite school facility development fees current at the time a building permit is issued. P:\STR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20)> 4-101 251 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 The current ESD Development Impact Fee for new development projects is $2.90 per residential square foot, $3,489 per residential unit, and $0.42 per commercial square foot.79 The current CJUHSD Developer Impact Fee for new development projects is $1.17 per residential square foot and $0.19 per commercial square foot.80 Therefore, with payment of the required fees to reduce any impacts of new development on school services (refer to RCM-PS-2, below), potential impacts to school services and facilities associated with implementation of the proposed Project would be less than significant, and no mitigation would be required. Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Regulatory Compliance Measure. No mitigation is required; however, the proposed Project is required to comply with California Education Code Section 17620(a)(1). RCM-PS-2 Payment of School Development Fee. Pursuant to California Education Code Section 17620(a)(1), the governing board of any school district is authorized to levy a fee, charge, dedication, or other requirement against any construction within the boundaries of the district for the purpose of funding the construction or reconstruction of school facilities. Prior to issuance of building permits, the Project Applicant/Developer shall submit proof of payment of all applicable school facility development fees to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Director of Planning, or designee. a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered government facilities, or the need for new or physically altered government facilities, the construction of which would cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for: iv Parks? As discussed in Section 4.16, Recreation, the City maintains and operates 36 park properties that account for 347.7 ac of parklands and recreational facilities, and a Multi -Use Regional Community Trails network that accounts for 295 ac of land for recreational use. In total, there is 642.6 ac of park and recreational land available for use by the residents of Rancho Cucamonga. The closest park to the Project site is Garcia Park, approximately 170 feet northwest of the Project boundary and 400 feet north of the Project site's area of development at 13150 Garcia Drive. Amenities at this park include picnic tables, barbecues, a playground, a full-size basketball court, and an exercise course. 79 written correspondence with Pam Polchow, Administrative Assistant II, Business Services, ESD, June 13, 2019, and phone conversation with Mike Harrison, Director of Operations, Planning and Facilities, CJUHSD, June 19, 2018. S0 Phone conversation with Mike Harrison, Director of Operations, Planning and Facilities, CJUHSD, June 19, 2019. 4-102 PASTR1901 - Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <<06/18/20» 252 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J The Community Services Element of the City's General Plan requires the provision of 5 ac of parkland per 1,000 residents. Given the existing (2018) population of 177,751 residents, the City would need to provide 888.755 ac of parklands and recreational facilities to meet this standard. The City currently provides 347.6 ac of developed parkland and special use facilities and 294.6 ac of multipurpose and community trails, for a total of 642.2 ac of parkland within the city. As such, the City is not currently meeting the standard of 5 ac of parkland per 1,000 residents. As discussed above, development of the proposed Project would result in an increase of 404 new residents. T addition of 404 residents generated by the proposed Project would require an additional 2.02 ac of parkland.81 The proposed Project includes the development of 39,467 sf (0.9 ac) of common usable space consisting of active and passive recreational amenities. Amenities include a pool and spa, barbecue facilities, a clubhouse, common open space areas, and multiple sport court areas (volleyball, cornhole, badminton, bocce ball, and horseshoes). Although the Project would provide on -site recreational space that can be used by the residents, it would not provide the required 2.02 ac of parkland. Although implementation of the proposed Project would cause an incremental increase in demand for parks, this increase would be partially offset by the inclusion of on -site recreational areas reserved for Project occupants and guests. In addition, the City requires payment of an in -lieu fee for upgrades to existing parks. Payment of these in -lieu fees, as required by RCM-PS-3 would serve to reduce Project -related impacts to parks to a less than significant level. Therefore, impacts to parks and recreational facilities would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Regulatory Compliance Measures and Mitigation Measures. No mitigation is required; however, the proposed Project would be required to comply with City Municipal Code Chapter 3.68.030. RCM-PS-3 Payment of Park Impact Fee. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department, or designee, shall confirm that the Project Applicant/Developer has paid all required park in-lieu/park impact fees as established in Chapter 3.68.030 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered government facilities, or the need for new or physically altered government facilities, the construction of which would cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for: v Other public facilities? S1 404 additional residents generated by the project * 5 ac per 1,000 residents, or 404 * 5 / 1,000 = 2.02 ac of parkland required as part of the project to meet the City's standard. PASTR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20)> 4-103 253 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 The Archibald Library, located at 7368 Archibald Avenue, is approximately 4.6 mi northwest of the Project site. This library facility is approximately 22,500 sf and houses 165,000 items.82 The Paul A. Biane Library at Victoria Gardens is approximately 23,000 sf and contains a book and media collection of 100,000 items, a 21-seat technology center, a story room, and a traditional reading room. The library has an additional 14,000 sf on the second level that is currently unused. As discussed above, development of the proposed Project would result in an increase of an estimated 404 new residents. Although implementation of the proposed Project would cause an increase in demand for library facilities, this increase would be minimal. In addition, the City requires payment of an in -lieu fee to prevent new residential development from reducing the quality and availability of public services provided to residents of Rancho Cucamonga by requiring new residential development to contribute to the cost of expanding the availability of library and cultural center assets in the city.83 Payment of these in -lieu fees, as required by Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 3.56 (refer to RCM-PS-4), would serve to reduce Project -related impacts to libraries to a less than significant level. Therefore, impacts to library facilities would be less than significant, and no mitigation would be required. Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Regulatory Compliance Measures and Mitigation Measures. No mitigation is required; however, the proposed Project would be required to comply with City Municipal Code Section 3.56. RCM-PS-4 Payment of Library Impact Fee. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department, or designee, shall confirm that the Project Applicant/Developer has paid all required Library Impact Fees as established in Section 3.56 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. S2 City of Rancho Cucamonga. 2010c. General Plan EIR. S3 City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, Section 3.56, Library Impact Fee. 4-104 PASTR1901 - Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <<06/18/20» 254 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J 4.16 RECREATION Less than Potentially Significant with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that ❑ ❑ ® ❑ substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which ❑ ❑ ® ❑ might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Impact Analysis a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? The City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Services Department (RCCSD) operates park and recreational facilities and programs for the City, including future residents of the Project, and manages scheduled park uses. The Public Works Services Department is responsible for the maintenance of park and all public facilities. The City maintains and operates 36 park properties that account for approximately 347.6 ac of parklands and recreational facilities. Parkland in the City consists of 25 neighborhood parks, 3 community parks, and 8 special -use facilities. Overall, the City has 170.3 ac of neighborhood parks, 96.0 ac of community parks, and 81.3 ac of special use facilities.84 In addition to parks and special facilities, the City's Multi -Use Regional and Community Trails add approximately 295 ac of land for recreational use.85 According to the Community Services Element, the City requires 5.0 ac of parkland for every 1,000 residents. Based on the City's estimated 2018 population of 177,75186 and the 642.6 total acres of park and recreational facilities, the City currently provides 3.615 ac of park space per 1,000 residents. Therefore, the City is not currently meeting its parkland standard of 5 ac per 1,000 residents. Based on the City's park classifications and service areas, the parks listed in Table 4.16.A would serve the Project site. However, all parks in Rancho Cucamonga could be affected because residents would be able to use any park and recreation facility in the city. S4 City of Rancho Cucamonga. 2010d. General Plan EIR. Chapter 4.15: Parks and Recreation. 85 Ibid. S6 U.S. Census Bureau. American Fact Finder. Rancho Cucamonga, California 2018 Population Estimate. PASTR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20)> 4-105 255 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 Table 4.16.A: Parks and Recreational Facilities in the Project Vicinity Distance from Size Name and Address Project Site' Type Amenities (miles) (acres) Garcia Park 0.19 Neighborhood 5.5 Reservable and nonreservable picnic tables, 13150 Garcia Drive Park barbecues, playground, full-size basketball Rancho Cucamonga court, baseball field, exercise course Victoria Arbors Park 1.09 Neighborhood 9.1 Reservable uncovered picnic shelter, 7429 Arbor Lane Park nonreservable picnic tables, barbecues, Rancho Cucamonga playground, full-size basketball court, softball/baseball field exercise course Windrows Park 1.63 Neighborhood 8.0 Picnic tables, barbecue, children's play 6849 Victoria Park Lane Park equipment area, equestrian trail access, Rancho Cucamonga exercise course, half-size basketball court, two softball/baseball fields, soccer/football field with no goalposts Sources: City of Rancho Cucamonga. Parks. Website: https://www.cityofrc.us/cityhall/cs/parks/loc/ (accessed June 7, 2019). City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan EIR, Chapter 4.15: Parks and Recreation (2010). Measured from the Project's proposed entrance driveway at Marshall Court. Approximately 39,467 sf (0.84 ac) of common recreational area would be included as part of the Project. On -site amenities include a pool and spa, barbecue facilities, a clubhouse, common open spaces areas, and multiple court sport areas (volleyball, cornhole, badminton, bocce ball, and horseshoes. Residents are anticipated to utilize the on -site recreational amenities and open space to a greater degree than off -site facilities due to convenience and proximity. The Project's provision of on -site open space and recreational facilities would reduce the use of parks by Project residents. Nevertheless, some Project residents would still be expected to utilize other recreational facilities. As a result, the proposed Project would create an incremental increase in the use of area parks. Increased demand for parks and other recreation services primarily results from increases in permanent population. The addition of approximately 404 new residents generated by the proposed Project could incrementally increase usage of City parks and recreational facilities. Based on the City's goal of providing 5 ac of parkland for every 1,000 residents, the proposed Project would create the need for approximately 2.02 ac of parkland in Rancho Cucamonga. The Quimby Act (State of California Planning and Zoning Law, Section 66477) allows the legislative body of a city to require the dedication of land for park facilities and/or the payment of in -lieu fees for park and recreational purposes as a condition to the approval for a final tract map or parcel map for certain subdivisions. Section 3.68 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code establishes Park In - Lieu Fees/Park Impact Fees. In addition, Section 3.52 of the Municipal Code also establishes a Community and Recreation Center Impact Fee. Both Section 3.52 and Section 3.68 would be applicable to the proposed Project. The City will require the Project Applicant/Developer to pay fees as identified in RCM-REC-1. Therefore, with the provision of 0.84 ac of on -site recreation space and the payment of In -Lieu Park Fees and Recreation Center Development Fees, impacts to recreation requirements would be less than significant. The proposed Project would not increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreation facilities such that substantial deterioration of the facilities would occur or be accelerated. 4-106 P:\STR1901 - Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <<06/18/20» 256 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Regulatory Compliance Measures and Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required; however, RCM-REC-1 would be implemented to reduce Project impacts to neighborhood and regional parks. RCM-REC-1 Dedication Fees. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department, or designee, shall confirm that the Project Applicant/Developer has paid all required in -lieu park fees and community and recreation center fees as required by Section 3.52 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. c) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? The proposed Project includes 0.84 ac of recreational amenities, which would be available only to residents and their guests. Additionally, there is 0.19 ac of private open space distributed throughout the residential units. The proposed Project would not include any recreational facilities that would be open to the general public. The construction of the recreational space is part of the proposed Project, and potential adverse effects associated with implementation of the recreational space have been considered throughout the analysis in this IS/MND. Therefore, the proposed Project does not include recreational facilities that would have an adverse physical effect on the environment, and no mitigation would be required. The increase in population associated with the proposed 131-unit Project would be approximately 404 residents. Based on the City's parkland requirement of 5 ac per 1,000 residents, the proposed Project would increase the demand for parkland in Rancho Cucamonga by 2.02 ac. As previously discussed in Threshold 4.16(a), the applicant is required by the City to pay in -lieu park fees and community and recreation center fees (refer to RCM-REC-1). The proposed Project does not involve the construction or expansion of recreational facilities beyond the 0.84 ac of common recreation space and 0.19 ac of private open space. Therefore, impacts related to construction or expansion of recreational facilities included in the proposed Project would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Regulatory Compliance Measures and Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required; however, RCM-REC-1, presented in Response 4.16(a), would be implemented to reduce Project -related impacts to neighborhood and regional parks. PASTR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20)> 4-107 257 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 4.17 TRANSPORTATION Less than Potentially Significant with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Would the project: a) Conflict with a program, plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ and pedestrian facilities? b) Conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines §15064.3, ❑ ❑ ® ❑ subdivision (b)? c) Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? d) Result in inadequate emergency access? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Discussion This section is based on the Westbury Transportation Impact Study (Fehr & Peers, April 2020). This report is included in Appendix J. Impact Analysis a) Would the project conflict with a program plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities? Project -related traffic impacts were analyzed in the Westbury Transportation Impact Analysis (Fehr & Peers, 2020) (TIA). The TIA assessed project -related traffic impacts at the following seven area intersections: 1. Interstate 15 (1-15) southbound ramps and Foothill Boulevard 2. 1-15 northbound ramps and Foothill Boulevard 3. Etiwanda Avenue and Foothill Boulevard 4. East Avenue and Foothill Boulevard 5. East Avenue and Project Driveway87 6. East Avenue and Project Driveway/Marshall Court 7. East Avenue and Miller Avenue The TIA evaluated the following six scenarios: • Existing (2018) Conditions • Existing (2018) Plus Project Conditions • Opening Year (2022) Conditions • Opening Year (2022) Plus Project Conditions 87 The intersection becomes a two -way -stop -controlled intersection under the Plus Project scenarios. 4-108 PASTR1901 - Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <<06/18/20» 258 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J • Cumulative Year (2040) Conditions • Cumulative Year (2040) Plus Project Conditions Intersection operating conditions in the study area were evaluated using the Transportation Research Board Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) 2010 methodology. The HCM 2010 Methodology estimates a quantitative delay at intersections and assigns a qualitative letter grade that represents the operations of the intersection. These grades range from level of service (LOS) A (minimal delay) to LOS F (excessive congestion). LOS E represents at -capacity operations. Descriptions of the LOS letter grades are provided in Table 4.17.A, Intersection LOS Descriptions. Table 4.17.A: Intersection LOS Descriptions Level of Description Service A Operations with very low delay occurring with favorable progression and/or short cycle length. B Operations with low delay occurring with good progression and/or short cycle lengths. C Operations with average delays resulting from fair progression and/or longer cycle lengths. Individual cycle failures begin to appear. D Operations with longer delays due to a combination of unfavorable progression, long cycle lengths, or high volume -to -capacity (V/C) ratios. Many vehicles stop and individual cycle failures are noticeable. Operations with high delay values indicating poor progression, long cycle lengths, and high V/C ratios. E Individual cycle failures are frequent occurrences. F Operation with delays unacceptable to most drivers occurring due to over saturation, poor progression, or very long cycle lengths. Sources: Westbury Transportation Impact Study (Fehr & Peers 2020) Highway Capacity Manual(Transportation Research Board 2010). The relationship between LOS and delay for signalized and unsignalized intersections is summarized in Table 4.17.13, Intersection LOS Criteria. Table 4.17.113: Intersection LOS Criteria Level of Service Signalized Delay (Seconds) Unsignalized Delay (Seconds) A < 10 < 10 B >10and <20 >10and <15 C >20and <35 >15and <25 D > 35 and < 55 > 25 and < 35 E >55and <80 >35and <50 F > 80 > 50 Sources: Westbury Transportation Impact Study (Fehr & Peers 2020) Highway Capacity Manual(Transportation Research Board 2010). The City considers LOS D as the upper limit of acceptable operation for intersections. Caltrans considers the transition between LOS C and LOS D as the minimum acceptable standard for state facilities. As the congestion management agency, the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority considers LOS E as the minimum acceptable threshold for the San Bernardino County Congestion Management Program (CMP) facilities. However, the CMP states that local agency P:\STR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20)> 4-109 259 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 thresholds should be applied as long as they provide improved service levels compared to the CMP requirement. Given that the City and Caltrans LOS standards are LOS D and LOS C, respectively, and the CMP threshold is LOS E, the local thresholds were applied for the impact assessment. For both City of Rancho Cucamonga and Caltrans facilities, a project traffic impact occurs at an intersection if the addition of project -generated trips causes an intersection operating at an acceptable LOS to deteriorate to an unacceptable LOS, or if the project increases the delay at any intersection already operating at an unacceptable LOS. The proposed Project involves the development of a 131-unit residential development, 4 commercial -ready units, and a commercial space. As discussed in Section 4.14, Population and Housing, the Project is anticipated to result in a population increase of approximately 404 people. Vehicular trips associated with the proposed Project would be generated primarily from residents and their visitors. As shown on Table 4.17.C, Project Trip Generation Summary, the proposed Project would generate approximately 1,036 daily trips, 63 a.m. peak -hour trips, and 88 p.m. peak -hour trips. Table 4.17.C: Project Trip Generation Summary Land Use Size Unit ADT AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour I In I Out I Total In I Out T Total Trip Rates' Multifamily Housing (Low -Rise) DU 7.32 0.11 0.35 0.46 0.35 0.21 0.56 Shopping Center TSF 37.75 0.58 0.36 0.94 1.83 1.98 3.81 Small Office Building TSF 16.19 1.59 0.33 1.92 0.78 1.67 2.45 Project Trip Generation Multifamily Housing (Low -Rise) 131 DU 959 14 46 60 46 27 73 Shopping Center 1.500 TSF 57 1 0 1 4 5 9 Small Office Building 1.200 TSF 20 2 0 2 2 4 6 Total Trip Generation 1,036 17 46 63 52 36 88 Source: Westbury Transportation Impact Study (Fehr & Peers 2020). 1 Trip rates referenced from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 10" Edition (2017). ADT = average daily trips DU = dwelling unit TSF = thousand square feet Existing Plus Project Conditions. Table 4.17.D summarizes the peak -hour LOS results for Existing Plus Project traffic conditions at the study intersections. As shown on this table, all study area intersections currently operate at acceptable LOS. With implementation of the Project, all study area intersections would continue to operate at acceptable LOS. Therefore, the proposed Project would not result in any significant impacts based on the LOS standards and significance criteria under existing conditions. 4-110 P:\STR1901 - Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <<06/18/20» 260 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J Table 4.17.D: Existing Plus Project Intersection LOS Summary Intersection Control Peak Hour Existing Existing Plus Project Significant Impact? Delay LOS Delay LOS A Delay Yes/No 1 1-15 Southbound Ramps/ Foothill Boulevard Signal AM 10.6 B 10.7 B 0.1 No PM 13.4 B 13.5 B 0.1 No 2 1-15 Northbound Ramps/ Foothill Boulevard Signal AM 17.5 B 17.5 B 0.0 No PM 20.1 C 20.3 C 0.2 No 3 Etiwanda Avenue/Foothill Boulevard Signal AM 38.1 D 38.4 D 0.3 No PM 38.6 D 38.2 D -0.4 No 4 East Avenue/Foothill Boulevard Signal AM 12.9 B 13.4 B 0.5 No PM 8.0 A 8.6 A 0.6 No 5 East Avenue/Project Driveway' OWSC AM - 11.1 B N/A PM - 10.2 B N/A 6 East Avenue/Project Driveway (Marshall Court) TWSC AM 11.6 B 12.6 B 1.0 No PM 10.2 B 10.8 B 0.6 No 7 East Avenue/Miller Avenue Signal AM 28.0 C 29.1 D 1.1 No PM 24.2 C 26.1 D 1.9 No Source: Westbury Transportation Impact Study (Fehr & Peers 2020). Delay is reported in seconds. 1 Intersection becomes a TWSC intersection in the Plus Project scenario. A = change 1-15 = Interstate 15 OWSC = one-way stop control LOS = level of service TWSC = two-way stop control N/A = not applicable Opening Year (2022) Plus Project Conditions. Table 4.17.E summarizes the peak -hour LOS results for Opening Year (2022) Plus Project traffic conditions at the study area intersections. As shown on this table, all study area intersections are forecast to operate at acceptable LOS. With implementation of the Project, all study area intersections would continue to operate at acceptable LOS. Therefore, the proposed Project would not result in any significant impacts based on the LOS standards and significance criteria under opening year conditions. Cumulative Year (2040) Plus Project Conditions. Table 4.17.F summarizes the peak -hour LOS results for the Cumulative Year (2040) Plus Project traffic conditions at the study area intersections. As shown on this table, all study area intersections are forecast to operate at acceptable LOS. With implementation of the Project, all study area intersections would continue to operate at acceptable LOS. Therefore, the proposed Project would not result in any significant impacts based on the LOS standards and significance criteria under cumulative year conditions. P:\STR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20)> 4-111 261 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA JUNE 2020 Table 4.17.E: Opening Year (2022) Plus Project Intersection LOS Summary Intersection Control Peak Hour Opening Year Opening Year Plus Project Significant Impact? Delay LOS Delay LOS A Delay Yes/No 1 1-15 Southbound Ramps/ Foothill Boulevard Signal AM 11.0 B 11.0 B 0.0 No PM 12.9 B 13.1 B 0.2 No 2 1-15 Northbound Ramps/ Foothill Boulevard Signal AM 18.8 B 18.9 B 0.1 No PM 15.4 B 15.5 B 0.1 No 3 Etiwanda Avenue/Foothill Boulevard Signal AM 42.1 D 42.7 D 0.6 No PM 40.6 D 41.5 D 0.9 No 4 East Avenue/Foothill Boulevard Signal AM 15.1 B 16.0 B 0.9 No PM 8.2 A 8.8 A 0.6 No 5 East Avenue/Project Driveway' OWSC AM - 10.4 B N/A PM - 10.2 B N/A 6 East Avenue/Project Driveway (Marshall Court) TWSC AM 11.7 B 11.8 B 0.1 No PM 10.7 B 10.8 B 0.1 No 7 East Avenue/Miller Avenue Signal AM 25.0 C 25.1 C 0.1 No PM 24.8 C 25.3 C 0.5 No Source: Westbury Transportation Impact Study (Fehr & Peers, April 2020). Delay is reported in seconds. 1 Intersection becomes a TWSC intesection in the Plus Project scenario. A = change 1-15 = Interstate 15 OWSC = one-way stop control LOS = level of service TWSC = two-way stop control N/A = not applicable Table 4.17.F: Cumulative Year (2040) Plus Project Intersection LOS Summary Intersection Control Peak Hour Cumulative Year Cumulative Year Plus Project Significant Impact? Delay LOS Delay LOS A Delay Yes/No 1 1-15 Southbound Ramps/ Foothill Boulevard Signal AM 12.4 B 12.5 B 0.1 No PM 13.7 B 13.8 B 0.1 No 2 1-15 Northbound Ramps/ Foothill Boulevard Signal AM 29.7 C 30.1 C 0.4 No PM 15.9 B 16.0 B 0.1 No 3 Etiwanda Avenue/Foothill Boulevard Signal AM 40.1 D 40.3 D 0.2 No PM 34.2 C 34.2 C 0.0 No 4 East Avenue/Foothill Boulevard Signal AM 30.0 C 34.7 C 4.7 No PM 12.2 B 14.8 B 2.6 No 5 East Avenue/Project Driveway' OWSC AM - 11.3 B N/A PM - 11.5 B N/A 6 East Avenue/Project Driveway (Marshall Court) TWSC AM 12.6 B 12.9 B 0.3 No PM 13.0 B 13.7 B 0.7 No 7 East Avenue/Miller Avenue Signal AM 26.5 C 26.6 C 0.1 No PM 30.0 C 30.5 C 0.5 No Source: Westbury Transportation Impact Study (Fehr & Peers, April 2020). Delay is reported in seconds. 1 Intersection becomes a TWSC intesection in the Plus Project scenario. A = change 1-15 = Interstate 15 OWSC = one-way stop control LOS = level of service TWSC = two-way stop control N/A = not applicable 4-112 P:\STR1901 - West bury\IInitial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <<06/18/20» 262 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J Regional access to the Project site is provided by East Avenue and Foothill Boulevard. East Avenue, the main roadway serving the Project site, is a tertiary travel corridor.88 Within the City's Circulation Plan, East Avenue is a Secondary roadway. Vehicle access to the Project site would be provided via two driveways along the western side of East Avenue. The northerly of the two driveways would connect with the existing East Avenue/Marshall Court intersection. Vehicular traffic to and from the Project site would utilize the existing network of regional and local roadways that currently serve the Project area. The proposed Project includes an internal private road that would provide resident access to residential and commercial units, as well as on -site amenities. Omnitrans operates four bus lines within the vicinity of the Project site: Route 66, which travels east -west along Foothill Boulevard; Route 67, which travels east -west along Baseline Road; Route 82, which travels north -south along Milliken Avenue and along Foothill Boulevard toward Victoria Gardens; and Route 85, which travels north -south along Milliken Avenue above Foothill Boulevard. The Rancho Cucamonga Metrolink Station is west of Milliken Avenue. Commuter train service is provided via the San Bernardino Line to/from downtown Los Angeles (Union Station) and downtown San Bernardino. Pedestrian access to the Project site from the sidewalk on East Avenue would be provided by four entrance gates. Pedestrian access to/from the parking area would be provided by five access gates. In addition, there would be one designated pedestrian access gate to provide pedestrian access to/from the parking area and the commercial area. The proposed Project would include improvements to the public sidewalk adjacent to the Project site along East Avenue. This would include a new asphalt section, curb and gutter improvements, landscaping improvements (such as street trees), two new drive approaches, and a wrought -iron fence and/or property boundary wall. Section 17.64.100 of the City's Municipal Code establishes bicycle parking requirements. Bicycle parking is required for all new multifamily residential construction in Rancho Cucamonga at a rate of 5 percent of the required parking. In the case of a residential development, a standard garage is sufficient. As discussed in Response 4.11(b), the proposed Project would provide 134 garage parking spaces. Therefore, the proposed Project would not conflict with adopted plans, programs, ordinances, or policies regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities. The City's General Plan Community Mobility Element (2010) sets forth the plan for all means of mobility in Rancho Cucamonga. The Community Mobility Element outlines specific goals and policies promoting an integrated and balanced multimodal transportation network of Complete Streets and the requirement that new development mitigate transportation impacts and improve the City's transportation system. The proposed Project would be required to be consistent with the goals and policies outlined in the Community Mobility Element. The proposed Project would be required to adhere to all regulations outlined in the City's Municipal Code. Chapter 12, Streets, Sidewalks and Public Places, of the City's Municipal Code serves as the traffic ordinance for Rancho Cucamonga and therefore establishes specific legal and organizational authority for traffic management and regulatory enforcement of use within the public right-of-way. 88 City of Rancho Cucamonga. 2010b. General Plan. Chapter 3: Community Mobility. PASTR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20)> 4-113 263 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 Section 12.20.080 establishes performance measures and implementation within the City's Complete Streets program. Chapter 17.78 of the City's Municipal Code, Transportation Demand Management, does not outline any requirements that apply to residential uses. The 2016 San Bernardino County Congestion Management Program (CMP) defines a network of State highways and arterials, level of service standards and related procedures, and a process for mitigation of impacts of new development on the existing transportation system.89 The Congestion Management Program incorporated the goals and policies of the 2016-2040 SCAG Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS). Appendix B of the 2016 CMP provides criteria for projects not requiring additional analysis of traffic impacts to CMP-monitored facilities. The San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG) has established thresholds for requiring analysis of potential impacts to CMP facilities. Any project meeting the CMP threshold of 250 two-way peak -hour trips that expects to add at least 50 people -hour trips to a State highway facility is required to prepare a Traffic Impact Analysis for Caltrans' review. If a project is forecasted to generate 100 to 250 peak -hour trips and expects to add at least 50 people -hour trips to a State highway facility, the jurisdiction should consult with Caltrans to determine the need for a Traffic Impact Analysis report. According to Table 3 in the Traffic Impact Analysis, Project Trip Generation Estimates, the Project generates fewer than 100 peak -hour trips and is therefore below the established threshold for requiring a CMP analysis. Because the trip generation is below the threshold established for analyzing potential impacts to CMP facilities, the impacts to CMP facilities are less than significant. The proposed Project would be required to adhere to policies in the City's General Plan Community Mobility Element, as well as regulations outlined in the City's Municipal Code. According to the intersection analyses of Existing Plus Project, Opening Year (2022) Plus Project, and Cumulative Year (2040) Plus Project conditions, there would be no significant impacts with regard to LOS. Project - related traffic volumes would not cause any study area intersection to degrade from acceptable LOS to unacceptable LOS. In addition, the Project does not meet the established threshold for analyzing CMP facilities because it generates fewer than 100 peak -hour trips. Further, final design of the proposed Project would be subject to review by the Traffic Engineer, or designee, at the City's Department of Public Works. Therefore, the proposed Project would result in a less than significant impact related to conflicts with an applicable plan, program, ordinance, or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities. No mitigation would be required. Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. S9 San Bernardino Associated Governments. 2016. San Bernardino Congestion Management Program. 4-114 PASTR1901 - Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <<06/18/20» 264 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J b) Would the project conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines §15064.3, subdivision (b)? According to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3(a), project -related transportation impacts are generally best measured by evaluating the project's VMT. VMT refers to the amount and distance of automobile travel attributable to a project. State CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3(b) sets forth criteria for analyzing transportation impacts, breaking down the methodology based on project type and specifying other criteria for conducting VMT analysis. For land use projects, VMT exceeding an applicable threshold of significance may indicate a significant impact. Generally, projects located within 0.5 mi of an existing high -quality transit corridor should be considered to have a less than significant impact. State CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3(b)(2) addresses VMT associated with transportation projects and states that projects that reduce VMT, such as pedestrian, bicycle, and transit projects, should be presumed to have a less than significant impact. Subdivision (b)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15064.3, acknowledges that Lead Agencies may not be able to quantitatively estimate VMT for every project type; in these cases, a qualitative analysis may be used. The regulation goes on to state that Lead Agencies have the discretion to formulate a methodology that would appropriately analyze a project's VMT. (State CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3(b)(4)). It is important to note that State CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3(c) states that while an agency may elect to be governed by the provisions of this section immediately, it is not required until July 1, 2020. The Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA (OPR 2018) identifies four potential screening thresholds for determining that residential development would likely have a less than significant impact on VMT. These screening criteria are: (1) the project would generate fewer than 110 daily trips, (2) the project is located in a low-VMT-generating area, (3) the project is located within 0.5 mi of a major transit stop,90 or (4) the project provides 100 percent affordable housing. According to the Westbury Transportation Impact Study, the proposed Project would generate over 1,000 daily trips. San Bernardino County has a higher VMT than the regional average; therefore, the Project site is not located in a low-VMT-generating area. The proposed Project is located within 0.5 mile of Omnitrans Bus Route 66 (Fontana —Foothill Boulevard —Montclair). However, the bus lines on this route operate every 30 minutes and therefore do not meet the screening threshold for a Project's proximity to transit operating every 15 minutes or more frequently. The proposed Project would not provide 100 percent affordable housing. Therefore, the proposed Project does not meet any of these potential screening thresholds. 90 Transit proximity is defined as a project located within 0.5 mi of rail transit or the intersection of two or more bus routes with service every 15 minutes (or more frequently) during peak commute periods. PASTR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20)> 4-115 265 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 CalEEMod is a model used statewide to estimate pollutant and GHG emissions for various aspects of construction and operation of a proposed Project. The Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA (OPR 2018) identifies models (and CalEEMod specifically) as potential tools for analyzing a project's VMT. The air quality analysis used the trip generation identified in Table 4.17.G to analyze the emissions produced by vehicles traveling to/from the Project. As the site is currently vacant, no VMT are generated by the site in the existing conditions. Table 4.17.G provides a comparison of VMT. Table 4.17.G: Project Effect on Vehicle Miles Traveled Annual VMT Existing Use 0 Proposed Development 3,421,274 Net Change 3,421,274 VMT=vehicle miles traveled At this time, the City has not established a methodology that would appropriately analyze VMT impacts within its jurisdiction. In addition, the City does not currently have thresholds or standards in place for assessing potential VMT impacts. Therefore, this information is provided for disclosure purposes only, and traffic impacts in this IS/MND are based on the City's level -of -service thresholds. Significance Determination: Inapplicable. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. c) Would the project substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? Vehicular traffic to and from the Project site would utilize the existing network of regional and local roadways that serve the Project area. Access to the Project site would be provided via two new full - access driveways. One of the driveways would connect to the existing East Avenue/Marshall Court intersection. As discussed in Response 4.17(a), the intersections at both Project driveways would operate at acceptable LOS B during both peak hours for all scenarios. The proposed Project includes an internal private road that would provide resident access to residential and commercial units. The Conceptual Fire Access Site Plan verifies the internal circulation system's ability to provide adequate fire engine access and turning radius throughout the entire community. The design of the proposed Project, including the internal private roadway, ingress, egress, and other streetscape changes, would be subject to review by the City's Department of Public Works. The proposed Project does not introduce any incompatible uses into the Project vicinity. Therefore, the proposed Project would not substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., a sharp curve or dangerous intersection) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment), and no mitigation would be required. Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. 4-116 P:\STR1901 - Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <<06/18/20» 266 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J d) Would the project result in inadequate emergency access? Construction. The proposed Project would require temporary lane closures on East Avenue to facilitate utility connections and construction of the sideway adjacent to the Project boundary. Temporary lane closures would be implemented consistent with the recommendations of the California Joint Utility Traffic Control Manual. Among other things, the manual recommends early coordination with affected agencies to ensure that emergency vehicle access is maintained. In this manner, officials could plan and respond appropriately in the event emergency vehicles would be required to access East Avenue. In addition, as described in Mitigation Measure HAZ-1, the Project Applicant/Developer would be required to prepare and implement a Construction Staging and Traffic Management Plan, which would be subject to the approval of the Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Department of Public Works, or designee. The Construction Staging and Traffic Management Plan would require certain conditions (e.g., providing warning signs, lights, and devices) and would require that the City of Rancho Cucamonga Police Department be notified a minimum of 48 hours in advance of any lane closures or roadway work. Therefore, with implementation of Mitigation Measure HAZ-1, impacts to emergency access during construction would be reduced to a less than significant level. No additional mitigation is required. Operation. Emergency access to the Project site would be provided by two driveways connecting to East Avenue on the eastern boundary of the Project site and internal roads providing circulation within the Project site. As specified in Regulatory Compliance Measure (RCM) TR-1, access to/from the site must be designed to City standards and would be subject to review by the RCFPD and the SBSD for compliance with fire and emergency access standards and requirements. Project conformance with City standards and RCFPD and SBSD emergency access standards and requirements would ensure that the on -site circulation system, including both driveways, would be approriately designed and sized to accommodate the maximum turning radius of RCFPD and SBSD emergency response vehicles. Therefore, approval of the Project plans would ensure that the proposed Project's impacts related to emergency access would be less than significant with implementation of RCM TR-1. Significance Determination: Potentially Significant. Regulatory Compliance Measures and Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required, but the proposed Project would be required to adhere to all applicable City, RCFPD, and SBSD standards for appropriate emergency access as described in RCM-TR-1. RCM-TR-1 Emergency Access Standards. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the Applicant shall submit Final Circulation Design and Emergency Access Plans for review and approval by the Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) Planning Department, or designee, the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (RCFPD), and the San Bernardino Sheriff's Department (SBSD). The plans shall comply with all applicable City, RCFPD, and SBSD standards for appropriate emergency access. The plans shall address all aspects of ingress to and egress from the Project site and the on -site circulation system, including the width of all Project driveways and on -site roadways to ensure that the minimum acceptable turning radius required to accommodate emergency response vehicles is provided, and shall PASTR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20)> 4-117 267 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 identify the location of all access gates, Knox boxes, and fire suppression facilities. In accordance with City, RCFPD, and SBSD standards, the Final Circulation Design and Emergency Access Plan shall show evidence that all Project access points and the on -site circulation system are designed in accordance with all applicable emergency access standards to ensure adequate emergency responder accessibility to the Project site. Level of Significance after Mitigation: Less than Significant Impact. 4-118 PASTR1901 - Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <<06/18/20» 268 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J 4.18 TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES Less than Potentially Significant with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code Section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is: i. Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical ❑ ❑ ❑ resources as defined in Public Resources Code Section 5020.1(k)? Or ii. A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1? In applying ❑ ® ❑ ❑ the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resource Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe. Impact Analysis a) Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code Section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is: i. Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code Section 5020.1(k)? Or ii. A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1? In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resource Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe. The following responses address Thresholds 4.18(a)(i) and 4.18(a)(ii). Chapter 532, Statutes of 2014 (i.e., AB 52), requires that Lead Agencies evaluate a project's potential to impact "tribal cultural resources." Such resources include sites, features, places, cultural landscapes, sacred places, and objects with cultural value to a California Native American tribe that are eligible for inclusion in the California Register or included in a local register of historical P:\STR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20)> 4-119 269 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 resources (PRC Section 21074). AB 52 also gives Lead Agencies the discretion to determine, supported by substantial evidence, whether a resource falling outside of the definition stated above nonetheless qualifies as a "tribal cultural resource." Also, per AB 52 (specifically, PRC 21080.3.1), a CEQA Lead Agency must consult with California Native American tribes that are traditionally and culturally affiliated with the geographic area of the proposed Project and have previously requested that the Lead Agency provide the tribe with notice of such projects. On December 16, 2019, the City sent letters for the purpose of AB 52 consultation to the following tribes: • Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians-Kizh • Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians Nationa • Gabrieleno/Tongva San Gabriel Band of • San Manuel Band of Mission Indians Mission Indians • Torres Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indians • Morongo Band of Mission Indians The letters (provided in Appendix L of this IS/MND) provided each tribe with the opportunity to request consultation with the City regarding the project. In compliance with AB 52, tribes had 30 days from the date of receipt of notification to request, in writing, consultation on the project. Information provided through tribal consultation will inform the assessment as to whether the tribes believe any tribal cultural resources are present on the project site. Two responses were received in response to the City's AB 52 letters. On January 10, 2020, the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians e-mailed City staff to discuss the project. Jessica Mauck, Cultural Resources Analyst for the tribe, stated that the tribe does not have any concerns with the project's implementation as planned. The e-mail from Ms. Mauck also included the tribe's suggested cultural resource and tribal cultural resource mitigation for the City to consider. These suggestions were incorporated into Mitigation Measures TRC-1 and TRC-2. In January 2020, the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation provided a letter to the City stating that the tribe is the direct lineal descendant of the project area. The letter provided the tribe's suggested cultural resource and tribal cultural resource mitigation measures for the City to consider. These suggestions were incorporated into Mitigation Measures TRC-1 and TRC-2. As discussed in Section 4.5, Cultural Resources, the property does not contain any buildings or structures that meet any California Register criteria or qualify as "historical resources" as defined by CEQA. Therefore, the proposed Project would not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in Section 15064.5 of the State CEQA Guidelines or PRC Section 5020.1(k). As discussed in Section 4.5, the Project site has been included in previous cultural resource studies and contains no previously recorded prehistoric or historic resources. On November 26, 2017, LSA archaeologist Gini Austerman conducted a pedestrian survey of the Project site. The survey did not 4-120 PASTR1901 - Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <<06/18/20» 270 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J identify any cultural or archaeological resources in the Project area and concluded that there is little potential for the proposed Project to impact prehistoric resources. In the unlikely event archaeological resources are discovered at any time during construction, those activities would be halted in the vicinity of the find until it can be assessed for significance by a qualified archaeologist (see Mitigation Measure CUL-1 in Section 4.5). Implementation of Mitigation Measure CUL-1 would reduce any potential impacts to previously undiscovered archaeological resources to a less than significant level. The City is recommending the inclusion of Mitigation Measures TCR-1 and TCR-2 to protect any potentially unknown tribal cultural resources on the Project site. In the unlikely event that ground - disturbing construction activities uncover a yet -to -be -discovered tribal cultural resource, implementation of Mitigation Measures TCR-1 and TCR-2 would reduce any potential impacts to previously undiscovered tribal cultural resources to a less than significant level. No additional mitigation is required. Therefore, with the implementation of mitigation, the proposed Project would result in less than significant impacts related to tribal cultural resources, and no mitigation would be required. Significance Determination: Potentially Significant Impact. Mitigation Measures: TCR-1 Native American Monitoring. Prior to commencement of grading activities, the Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department, or designee, shall confirm that a qualified Native American monitor has been contacted and will be allowed access to the project site to provide Native American monitoring services during ground -disturbing project construction activities. The Native American monitor shall be selected by the City from the list of certified Native American monitors maintained by the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation. -The selected Native American monitor(s) shall be invited to the pre -grading conference to establish procedures for tribal cultural resource surveillance. Monitoring procedures shall include provisions for temporarily halting or redirecting work and creating a 50-foot buffer zone area to permit sampling, identification, and evaluation of resources deemed by the Native American monitor(s) to be tribal cultural resources as defined in Public Resources Code (PRC) Section 21074. Construction activities can continue outside of this buffer zone area. These monitoring procedures shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) Planning Department, or designee, prior to commencement of any surface disturbance on the project site. The Native American monitor(s) shall complete monitoring logs on a daily basis that provide descriptions of the daily activities, including construction activities, locations, soil, and any cultural materials identified. The Native American monitor(s) shall also provide insurance certificates, including liability insurance, meeting or exceeding requirements specified by the Applicant. The on -site monitoring shall cease when project grading and excavation activities are completed, or when the PASTR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20)> 4-121 271 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION JUNE 2020 tribal representatives and monitor(s) have indicated that the site has a low potential for tribal cultural resources. TCR-2 Previously Unknown Tribal Cultural Resources. Prior to commencement of grading activities, the Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department, or designee, shall verify that all Project grading and construction plans include requirements specifying that if tribal cultural resources are discovered during excavation, grading, or construction activities, work shall cease within 50 feet of the find until a qualified archaeologist (who meets Secretary of the Interior Standards) has evaluated the find in accordance with federal, State, and local guidelines to determine whether the find constitutes a "unique archaeological resource" as defined in Section 21083.2(g) of the California Public Resources Code (PRC). If the find is determined to be a unique archaeological resource, the found deposits shall be treated in accordance with federal, State, and local guidelines, including, but not limited to, those set forth in PRC Section 21083.2. Any finds dating to the pre - contact period shall be also assessed by a representative from the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians (who have requested to be given the opportunity to provide input with regards to significance and treatment of pre -contact finds) and from the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation to determine whether the find constitutes a "tribal cultural resource" as defined in PRC Section 21074. If the find is determined to be a tribal cultural resource, a representative from the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians and from the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation shall coordinate the treatment and curation of these resources with the Project Applicant/Developer and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Should the find be deemed significant, as defined by CEQA, a cultural resources Monitoring and Treatment Plan (Plan) shall be created by the archaeologist, in coordination with the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians and Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation, and all subsequent finds shall be subject to this Plan. This Plan shall allow for a Native American monitor from the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation to continue to be present and for a Native American monitor from the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians to be present for the remainder of the Project, should the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians elect to place a monitor on -site. Construction personnel of the proposed Project shall not collect or move any archaeological or tribal cultural resources and associated materials. Construction activity may continue unimpeded on other portions of the Project site during assessment and treatment of tribal cultural resources. Any and all archaeological/cultural documents and records created as part of the Project shall be supplied to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for dissemination to the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians and to the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall, in good faith, consult with the two tribes throughout the life of the Project. Level of Significance after Mitigation: Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. 4-122 PASTR1901 - Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <<06/18/20» 272 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J 4.19 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS Less than Potentially Significant with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Would the project: a) Require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or stormwater drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications ❑ ❑ ® ❑ facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects? b) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ normal, dry and multiple dry years? c) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? d) Generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals? e) Comply with federal, state, and local management and El El ® El statutes and reeulations related to solid waste? Impact Analysis a) Would the project require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or stormwater drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects? Water. Delivery of domestic water service in Rancho Cucamonga is provided by CVWD. CVWD provides water and wastewater services to approximately 190,000 people across 47 square miles. The CVWD service area includes 48,000 water connections and 37,000 sewer connections, with an average daily demand of 47 million gallons per day (mgd).91 The Project is within CVWD's service area. According to the 2015 Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP), CVWD's three main sources of water include (1) groundwater, (2) local canyon runoff (surface and subsurface flows), and (3) imported surface water delivered through the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California. From 2006 to 2015, CVWD's total water supply was approximately 46.6 percent imported water, 45.3 percent groundwater, 6.5 percent canyon water, and 1.6 percent recycled water.92 Water demand associated with the proposed Project would be typical of residential water usage in Rancho Cucamonga. Long-term demand for water would occur during operation of the proposed Project. In its existing condition, there are no uses on the Project site that have a daily potable water demand. 91 Cucamonga Valley Water District. 2018. About Us. 92 Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD). 2015 Urban Water Management Plan. PASTR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20)> 4-123 273 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 CVWD has determined it is able to meet the current and projected full -service demands of its customers under all hydrologic conditions through 2035. In normal and single dry years, the district's groundwater supply is not anticipated to be affected. In multiple dry years, CVWD's surface water supplies are expected to be reduced. To meet demand, the difference from reduced canyon flows and imported water would be made up from CVWD's stored groundwater from the Chino Basin and implementation of its water shortage contingency plan.93 Table 4.19.A shows the supply and demand forecasts for the multiple dry year scenario. Table 4.19.A: Water Supply and Demand Projections Comparison — Multiple Dry Year Third -Year Supply (2020-2035) Year Water Supply (AFY) Water Demand Difference 2020 60,500 60,500 0 2025 63,100 63,100 0 2030 65,700 65,700 0 2035 65,700 65,700 0 Source: Cucamonga Valley Water District, Urban Water Management Plan, Table 47 (2015). AFY = acre-feet per year. CVWD's water demands over the years 2015-2035 are based on the 2013 Water Supply Master Plan. For years 2020 through 2035, demand is escalated proportionally with population growth projections, which CVWD estimates by using the current population density and the remaining buildable area in its service area.94 According to the City's General Plan, Rancho Cucamonga will be fully built out by 2030 and therefore will not experience an increase in total population between 2030 and 2035.95 Based on the reliability of CVWD's supply and the surplus in water availability in past years, CVWD would be able to meet regional water demand under the multiple dry year hydrology condition. The proposed Project is anticipated to demand approximately 38,907 gallons per day (gpd) of water.96 Although the proposed Project would result in an increase in water usage, the total amount of anticipated water usage by the Project represents approximately 0.1 percent of the water in CVWD's service area in 2015.97 Consequently, the anticipated water demand of the proposed Project would be negligible compared to CVWD's water supply. In addition, as stated previously, CVWD has adequate water supply to meet demand during the single dry year and multiple dry year scenarios. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would not require or result in the 93 Cucamonga Valley Water District. 2015. Urban Water Management Plan. Website: https://www. cvwdwater.com/DocumentCenter/View/1955/2015-Urban-Water-Management-Plan---CVWD?bidld= (accessed June 14, 2019). 94 Ibid. 95 Ibid. 96 For residential uses, water use was estimated to be 110 percent of wastewater generation. As discussed below, the project would generate 35,370 gpd of wastewater. 35,370 gpd * 1.1= 38,907 gpd. 97 According to the UWMP, the 2015 Actual Volume was 42,679 acre-feet. 38,907 gpd _ 24,679 acre-feet = 0.001 or 0.1 percent. 4-124 PASTR1901 - Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <<06/18/20» 274 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J relocation or construction of new or expanded water treatment facilities, and no mitigation would be required. As is required of all new development in California, the proposed Project would comply with California State law regarding water conservation measures, including pertinent provisions of Title 24 of the California Government Code regarding the use of water -efficient appliances and low -flow plumbing fixtures. Additionally, the Project would comply with the City of the Rancho Cucamonga State Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 17.82.020) (refer to RCM-UTL-1), which requires the submittal of a Landscaping Plan illustrating compliance with the provisions of the City's landscaping guidelines. Approval of the Landscaping Plan would ensure that landscaping included as part of the Project would not result in a water demand that would adversely affect the City's existing water supply. Therefore, the increased water demand resulting from the Project is anticipated to be minimal and would be within the existing service capacity of CVWD. As such, the proposed Project would not necessitate new or expanded water entitlements, and CVWD would be able to accommodate the increased demand for potable water. Therefore, Project impacts associated with an increase in potable water demand are considered less than significant, and no mitigation is required. Regulatory Compliance Measure: RCM-UTL-1 Landscape Water Efficiency Ordinance. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Director of Planning, or designee, shall confirm that the Final Landscaping Plan for the proposed Project is consistent with all applicable provisions outlined in the City's Landscape Water Efficiency Ordinance. Wastewater. CVWD provides water and wastewater services to approximately 190,000 people across 47 square miles. CVWD service area includes 48,000 water connections and 37,000 sewer connections, with an average daily demand of 47 mgd.98 The Project is within CVWD's service area. Wastewater generated by the Project would be delivered to the Inland Empire Utilities Agency (IEUA) RP-4 treatment plant. The IEUA is a regional wastewater treatment agency responsible for serving 875,000 people across 242 square miles in San Bernardino County. The PD-4 treatment plant currently has an available capacity of 4.5 mgd.99 The proposed Project is anticipated to generate approximately 35,370 gpd of wastewater.100 The total amount of wastewater generated by the proposed Project represents approximately 0.8 percent of the daily remaining treatment capacity at RP-4, which would treat wastewater from the Project site.101 Consequently, the increase in wastewater generated by the proposed Project would be negligible 11 Cucamonga Valley Water District. 2018. About Us. Website: https://www.cvwdwater.com/35/About-Us (accessed June 12, 2019). 99 Written correspondence with Kenneth Tam, Senior Associate Engineer, IEUA. June 13, 2019. 100 According to the IEUA, the daily flow for one residential household is 270 gpd. 270 gpd * 131 units = 35,370 gpd. 101 35,370 gpd - 4.5 mgd = 0.00786 or 0.8 percent. PASTR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20)> 4-125 275 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 (less than 1 percent) compared to the available wastewater treatment capacity of PD-4. Implementation of the proposed Project would not create a need to expand existing wastewater facilities. Development of the proposed Project would not require, nor would it result in, the construction or relocation of new or expanded wastewater treatment or collection facilities other than those facilities to connect to existing infrastructure in East Avenue. Therefore, Project impacts related to the construction of wastewater treatment or collection facilities would be less than significant, and no mitigation would be required. Stormwater Drainage Facilities. As shown on Figure 2.8, Utility Plan, Project improvements would include the addition of an on -site storm drain that would run south and connect to the existing storm drain system in East Avenue. Implementation of the proposed Project would increase the impervious surface area on the Project site by 5 ac, which would increase stormwater runoff from the Project site. As specified in Compliance Measure RCM-WQ-3, a Final Hydrology Study would be approved by the City and would demonstrate that the on -site drainage facilities are designed and adequately sized to convey and reduce runoff such that on -site and off -site drainage facility capacity would not be exceeded during a design storm. With implementation of RCM-WQ-3, the proposed Project would not exceed the capacity of downstream stormwater drainage facilities or cause the expansion of existing facilities. Additionally, the proposed Project would not require or result in the construction of new stormwater drainage facilities or the expansion of existing facilities beyond the improvements included as part of the proposed Project. Therefore, impacts to stormwater drainage facilities would be less than significant with the incorporation of RCM-WQ-3. Electric Power. Refer to Section 4.6, Energy, for further discussion related to the Project's impacts with respect to existing and projected supplies of electricity. As discussed further in Section 4.6, the Project would not require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded electric power facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects. No mitigation would be required. Natural Gas. The Project does not include any utility improvements related to natural gas. Therefore, the Project would not require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded natural gas facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects. No mitigation would be required. Telecommunications. Construction activities associated with the proposed Project would not increase the demand for telecommunications facilities. In addition, the proposed Project would not involve the construction or relocation of new or expanded telecommunications facilities. As discussed in Section 4.14, Population and Housing, the Project is anticipated to result in a population increase of approximately 404 people; the increase in population resulting from the proposed Project comprises less than 1 percent of the total population of Rancho Cucamonga and does not represent a substantial increase in population. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would not result in impacts related to the construction or relocation of existing telecommunications facilities, and no mitigation would be required. Summary. The proposed Project would not require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded facilities for water, wastewater treatment, storm drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications. Existing facilities have the capacity to serve the anticipated uses, and 4-126 PASTR1901 - Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <<06/18/20» 276 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J the Project would not substantially increase demand upon these facilities as compared to historic and existing conditions at the Project site. Therefore, impacts to these utility facilities would be less than significant, and no mitigation would be required. Significance Determination: Less than Significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. b) Would the project have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry and multiple dry years? As previously stated in Response 4.19(a), above, the Project would have sufficient water supplies available to serve the Project and reasonably foreseeable development during normal, dry, and multiple dry years. Taking projected population growth into account, CVWD anticipates a surplus in water supply for the years 2020, 2025, 2030, and 2035.102 As stated previously, the proposed Project is anticipated to use approximately 38,907 gpd of water. Further, the total amount of anticipated water usage by the Project represents approximately 0.1 percent of the water in CVWD's service area in 2015. Therefore, water demand from the proposed Project would be within CVWD's current and projected water supplies available to serve the Project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry, and multiple dry years. Impacts related to water supplies would be less than significant, and no mitigation would be required. Significance Determination: Less than Significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. c) Would the project result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? Refer to Response 4.19(a). Although the proposed Project would increase wastewater demand on site, the increased wastewater flows from the proposed Project could be accommodated within the existing design capacity of the IEUA RP-4 treatment plant that would serve the Project site. The IEUA confirmed that the proposed Project would not create a need to expand existing IEUA facilities.l°s Therefore, the IEUA would have adequate capacity to serve the Project's projected demand in addition to its existing commitments. Therefore, impacts related to wastewater treatment are less than significant, and no mitigation would be required. Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. 102 Cucamonga Valley Water District. 2015. Urban Water Management Plan. Website: https://www.cvwd water.com/DocumentCenter/View/1955/2015-Urban-Water-Management-Plan---CVWD?bidld= (accessed June 14, 2019). 10' Written correspondence with Kenneth Tam, Senior Associate Engineer, IEUA. June 13, 2019. PASTR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20)> 4-127 277 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 d) Would the project generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals? Solid waste collection and transport in Rancho Cucamonga is handled by contracted private firms that haul collected materials to regional landfills and materials recycling facilities.104 The Project site would be served by Burrtec Waste Industries, Inc. (Burrtec). Burrtec uses a three -bin system for recycling and waste disposal. Solid waste collected from the Project site would be anticipated to be hauled to Burrtec's West Valley Materials Recovery Facility (MRF) in Fontana. Solid waste that is not diverted is primarily disposed at the Mid -Valley Landfill, a municipal landfill located in Rialto. The Mid -Valley Landfill has a daily permitted capacity of 7,500 tons per day (tpd), a remaining capacity of 67,520,000 cubic yards, and an anticipated close date of 2033.105 On average, 3,474 tons are disposed daily.106 On average, the landfill has a remaining daily disposal capacity of 4,026 tons. As described further in Section 4.14, Population and Housing, the proposed Project includes the construction of 131 residential units and 4 commercial -ready units that would result in an increase of approximately 404 residents on the Project site. The proposed Project would generate approximately 0.8 tpd of solid waste during Project operation.107 As stated previously, the Mid - Valley Landfill has the capacity to process an additional 4,026 tpd of waste. The incremental increase of solid waste generated by the proposed Project would constitute approximately 0.02 percent of the remaining daily available capacity (4,026 tpd) at the Mid -Valley Landfill. Furthermore, 57 percent of the solid waste produced daily in Rancho Cucamonga is diverted from landfills through recycling and reuse.108 As such, solid waste generated by the proposed Project would not cause the capacity of the Mid -Valley Landfill to be exceeded. The proposed Project would not generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure. Moreover, the Project would not impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals. Therefore, the Project would result in a less than significant impact to solid waste and landfill facilities, and no mitigation would be required. Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. 104 City of Rancho Cucamonga. 2010f. General Plan Program EIR. Chapter 4.17: Utilities and Service Systems. Website: https://www.cityofrc.us/civicax/filebank/blobdload.aspx?BloblD=7611 (accessed June 13, 2019). 1os County of San Bernardino. 2019. San Bernardino Countywide Plan Draft EIR. Website: http://countywideplan.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/Ch_05-18-USS.pdf (accessed June 17, 2019). 106 Ibid. 107 131 residential units * 12.23 pounds per dwelling unit per day (generation rate obtained from CalRecycle, Estimated Solid Waste Generation and Disposal) => 1,602.13 pounds per day, the equivalent of 0.80106 ton. 108 City of Rancho Cucamonga. 2010j. Public Facilities and Infrastructure Element. 4-128 PASTR1901 - Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <<06/18/20» 278 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J e) Would the project comply with federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste? The California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989 (AB 939) changed the focus of solid waste management from landfill to diversion strategies (e.g., source reduction, recycling, and composting). The purpose of the diversion strategies is to reduce dependence on landfills for solid waste disposal. AB 939 established mandatory diversion goals of 25 percent by 1995 and 50 percent by 2000. AB 341 (2011) amended the California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989 to include a provision declaring that it is the policy goal of the State that not less than 75 percent of solid waste generated be source -reduced, recycled, or composted by the year 2020 and annually thereafter. In addition, AB 341 required the California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) to develop strategies to achieve the State's policy goal. CalRecycle has conducted multiple workshops and published documents that identify priority strategies to assist the State in reaching the 75 percent goal by 2020. According to the Rancho Cucamonga Sustainable Community Action Plan (2017), future solid waste reduction strategies include enhanced construction waste diversion, improved recycling opportunities (including composting), and reduced food waste. Although these strategies are aimed at improving the City's environmental sustainability overall, they may also improve the City's total waste diversion rate. In addition, the proposed Project would be required to comply with all federal, State, and local regulations related to solid waste. Furthermore, the proposed Project would comply with all standards related to solid waste diversion, reduction, and recycling during Project construction and operation. Therefore, the proposed Project is anticipated to result in less than significant impacts related to potential conflicts with federal, State, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations pertaining to solid waste, and no mitigation would be required. Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. PASTR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20)> 4-129 279 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 4.20 WILDFIRE Less than Potentially Significant with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the project: a) Substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or ❑ ❑ ® ❑ emergency evacuation plan? b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project occupants to ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire? c) Require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment? d) Expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ of runoff, post -fire slope instability, or drainage changes? Impact Analysis a) Would the project substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? Refer to the response to Response 4.9(f). As described in Mitigation Measure HAZ-1, the Project Applicant/Developer would be required to prepare and implement a Construction Staging and Traffic Management Plan, which would be subject to the approval of the Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Department of Public Works, or designee. The Construction Staging and Traffic Management Plan would require certain conditions (e.g., providing warning signs, lights, and devices) and would require that the City of Rancho Cucamonga Police Department be notified a minimum of 48 hours in advance of any lane closures or roadway work. With implementation of Mitigation Measure HAZ-1, potential impacts to emergency response and evacuation plans associated with construction of the proposed Project would be reduced to a less than significant level. The Project would be developed in accordance with City emergency access standards. Access to and from the Project site for emergency vehicles would be reviewed and approved by RCFPD and the City as part of the project approval process to ensure the proposed Project is compliant with all applicable codes and ordinances for emergency vehicle access. Compliance with existing codes and ordinances would ensure that potential impacts related to emergency response and evacuation plans associated with construction of the proposed Project would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: Potentially Significant Impact. 4-130 PASTR1901 - Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <<06/18/20» 280 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J Mitigation Measures: Refer to Mitigation Measure HAZ-1. Level of Significance after Mitigation: Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. b) Would the project, due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project occupants to pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire? Topography influences the movement of air, thereby directing a fire's course. Where slope increases, the rate of spread of a wildland fire also increases. The Project site is located in a developed portion of Rancho Cucamonga. According to the Rancho Cucamonga Local Hazard Mitigation Plan, the Project site and surrounding area have a slope of less than 10 percent. The San Gabriel Mountains and San Bernardino Forest to the north and northeast feature steep mountains that contain slopes exceeding 30 percent. The area downslope from the mountains is predominantly developed and nonvegetated, but there are pockets of fuel and grass regrowth from the 2003 wildfires that contribute to a high fire risk hazard in Rancho Cucamonga.10' Additionally, windstorms are considered a chronic hazard for the City of Rancho Cucamonga."" Wind events magnify the risk of wildfire and have the potential to expose inhabitants of Rancho Cucamonga to elevated pollutant concentrations and the uncontrolled spread of wildfire from VHFHSZs to the north of the Project site in the foothills of the San Gabriel and San Bernardino Mountains. The proposed Project would introduce new development and a permanent population in an undeveloped area that does not currently contain any permanent residents. In its existing condition, the Project site is relatively flat and there are no significant slopes adjacent to the site. In accordance with the California Fire Code, the RCFPD's Board of Directors has adopted a map designating the Wildland-Urban Interface Fire Area within Rancho Cucamonga. The designated area is inclusive of the designated High and Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones in the State Responsibility Area that is within the jurisdictional boundaries of the RCFPD. The designated area also includes areas within Rancho Cucamonga that have been identified as fire hazard severity zones by CAL FIRE (also known as Local Responsibility Area fire hazard severity zones). The designated area also includes portions of Rancho Cucamonga that have been identified by the RCFPD as having a high wildfire hazard or risk based on wildland fire history. The Project site is identified as a VHFHSZ on the RCFPD map. The proposed Project involves the development a 131-unit residential development, which would reduce the amount of vegetation/combustible materials on site compared to existing conditions. As discussed in Section 4.14, Population and Housing, the proposed Project is anticipated to result in a population increase of approximately 404 people. Adjacent roadways that surround the Project site (such as Miller Avenue, Etiwanda Avenue, East Avenue, and Foothill Boulevard) would serve as fire breaks in the unlikely event of the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire. Additionally, 1-15 separates the Project site from other VHFHSZ areas to the east and north. It is expected that 1-15 would also serve 109 City of Rancho Cucamonga. 2013. Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. 110 Ibid. PASTR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20)> 4-131 281 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 as an effective firebreak in the unlikely event that a wildfire enters the Wildland-Urban Interface Fire Area to the east and north of the Project site via the San Gabriel and San Bernardino Mountains. The RCFPD strives to reduce the risk of wildfire through the Weed Abatement Program, which targets specific hazard areas that face an increased danger of wildfire."' The RCFPD conducts a spring and fall inspection to ensure that weeds, dead trees, invasive grasses, tumbleweeds, and other vegetation debris are removed or maintained in accordance with Section 8.46.040 of the City's Municipal Code. In 2017, the RCFPD adopted Standard 49-1 to establish and detail local regulations for the designated Wildland-Urban Interface Fire Area as allowed by the California Fire Code, the State Fire Marshal, and the laws and regulations of the State of California. Among other things, Standard 49-1 requires the establishment of fuel modification zones, the development of a fire protection plan for the Project site, and a comprehensive landscaping plan showing the vegetation management zones and the exact locations proposed for all plants, shrubs, trees, and native vegetation. RCM-FIRE-1 requires the proposed Project to comply with RCFPD Standard 49-1. Adherence to the California Fire Code, the City's Municipal Code, and RCFPD Standard 49-1 would reduce the chance of structure ignition on the Project site in the unlikely event of a wildfire. Furthermore, the proposed Project would result in clearing, grading, paving, and revegetation of 3.45 ac according to RCFPD requirements, resulting in the decreased availability of easily combustible materials (i.e., existing eucalyptus trees) on the Project site. A portion of the Project site is encumbered by a Southern California Gas Company utility easement. The surface of this area is paved with concrete and does not contain the combustible materials necessary to contribute to the start or spread of a wildfire. In summary, the Project site is located within a VHFHSZ but would adhere to the requirements of RCFPD Standard 49-1. As such, the Project itself would not exacerbate wildfire risks as compared to existing conditions because it is representative of existing development in the area. Impacts of downwind pollutant concentrations to occupants as a result of the Project would be negligible. Therefore, due to slope, prevailing winds, location, or other factors, the proposed Project would not exacerbate wildfire risks. No mitigation is required. Significance Determination: Less than Significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required, but the proposed Project is required to comply with RCFPD Standard 49-1. RCM-FIRE-1: Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Standard 49-1. The Project shall adhere to the requirements of Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (RCFPD) Standard 49-1. The fire protection plan shall be approved by RCFPD and recorded on the parcel prior to the issuance of any construction permits. In addition, Vegetation 111 City of Rancho Cucamonga. 2013. Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. Website: https://www.cityofrc.us/ civicax/filebank/blobdload.aspx?Blob ID=5780 (accessed May 29, 2019). 4-132 PASTR1901 - Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <<06/18/20» 282 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J Management Zone 1 Fuel Modification is required to be completed before construction with combustible materials will be approved. The required fuel modification is required to be maintained for the duration of the construction. c) Would the project require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment? Utility and infrastructure improvements included as part of the Project are described in Section 2.0, Project Description. The proposed Project would require connections to existing off -site infrastructure systems, including connections to off -site water, sanitary sewer, and stormwater drains. With the exception of stormwater drains, all utility installations would connect to existing infrastructure on East Avenue. Although the proposed Project would include internal on -site roadways, the Project does not include any changes to public or private roadways that would exacerbate fire risk or that would result in impacts to the environment. Proposed utility improvements would be located underground and would not exacerbate fire risk. Project design and implementation of utility improvements would be reviewed and approved by the City's Public Works Department as part of the project approval process to ensure the proposed Project is compliant with all applicable fire coded, design standards, and regulations. The installation of Project -related utilities and an on -site roadway network would not exacerbate fire risk due to the Project site's location in an urban and built -out area outside of a designated fire hazard zone. Furthermore, the improved connectivity of water lines would aid in fire suppression compared to existing conditions on the Project site in the unlikely event of a wildfire. Therefore, the proposed Project would not require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines, or other utilities) that would exacerbate fire risk or result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment. There would be no temporary or ongoing impact to the environment, and no mitigation would be required. Significance Determination: Less than Significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. d) Would the project expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post -fire slope instability, or drainage changes? Landslides. Landslides and other forms of mass wasting, including mudflows, debris flows, and soil slips, occur as soil moves downslope under the influence of gravity. Landslides are frequently triggered by intense rainfall or seismic shaking but can also occur as a result of erosion and downslope runoff caused by rain following a fire. As previously discussed in Section 4.7, Geology and Soils, Response 3.6(a)(iv), landslides or other forms of natural slope instability do not represent a significant hazard to the Project because the site is located in a relatively flat area, and there is no evidence of landslides in the Project vicinity. Additionally, the Project site does not lie within a PASTR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20)> 4-133 283 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION JUNE 2020 designated Landslide Hazard Zone. Therefore, the proposed Project would not expose people or structures to significant risks, such as landslides, as a result of runoff, post -fire slope instability, or drainage changes. Impacts to Project occupants related to post -wildfire landslide risks would be less than significant. Flooding. According to the FEMA Flood Hazard Map, the Project site is within Zone X (Area with Reduced Flood Risk Due to Levee) of a 100-year floodplain. Zone X designates areas of moderate flood risk; these are the areas between the limits of the base flood and the 0.2 percent annual chance flood, or 500-year flood. However, as specified in Response 4.10(c)(iv), the Project site is not in a direct inundation area and is protected by a levee.11z Therefore, downslope or downstream flooding as a result of runoff, post -fire slope instability, or drainage changes are unlikely to occur. Impacts to Project occupants related to post -wildfire flooding risks would be less than significant. Significance Determination: Less than Significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. 112 City of Rancho Cucamonga. 2013. Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. Figure PS-5. 4-134 PASTR1901 - Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <<06/18/20» 284 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J 4.21 MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE Less than Potentially Significant with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact a) Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are ❑ ❑ ® ❑ considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either ❑ ® ❑ ❑ directiv or indirectiv? Impact Analysis a) Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? Based on the discussion in Section 4.4, Biological Resources, the proposed Project is anticipated to result in less than significant impacts related to habitat, wildlife species, and/or plant and animal communities. With implementation of Mitigation Measure B10-1, impacts to DSF would be less than significant. With implementation of Mitigation Measure B10-2, impacts to burrowing owls would be less than significant. With implementation of Mitigation Measure B10-3, impacts to Los Angeles pocket mouse and San Bernardino kangaroo rat would be less than significant. With implementation of B10-4, impacts to non -listed special -status reptiles would be less than significant. The proposed Project would not eliminate a plant or animal community, nor would it substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal. As discussed in Section 4.5, Cultural Resources, Response 4.5(a), the Project site does not contain any buildings or structures that meet any of the California Register criteria or qualify as "historical resources" as defined by CEQA. Further, the Project site is not designated as a historical/archaeological landmark by the City or the County. Therefore, the proposed Project would not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource. PASTR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20)> 4-135 285 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 As discussed in Section 4.18, Tribal Cultural Resources, the City consulted with California Native American tribes that are traditionally and culturally affiliated with the geographic area of the proposed Project and have previously requested that the Lead Agency provide the tribe with notice of such projects. In the unlikely event that ground -disturbing construction activities uncover a yet - to -be -discovered tribal cultural resource, implementation of Mitigation Measures TCR-1 and TCR-2 would reduce any potential impacts to previously undiscovered tribal cultural resources to a less than significant level. No additional mitigation is required. Therefore, with the implementation of mitigation, the proposed Project would result in less than significant impacts related to tribal cultural resources, and no mitigation would be required For the reasons stated above, the Project does not have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. Impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation would be required. Significance Determination: Potentially Significant Impact. Mitigation Measures: Refer to Mitigation Measures 1310-1, 1310-2, 1310-3, 1310-4, CUL-1, TCR-1, and TCR-2. Level of Significance after Mitigation: Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? The proposed Project involves the construction of a 131-unit residential development with 4 commercial -ready units, a commercial space, and various on -site amenities. The site is currently undeveloped and vacant, but it is in an urban area surrounded by a variety of residential and commercial uses. The proposed Project would rely on and can be accommodated by the existing road system, public parks, public services, and utilities. The proposed Project would not result in or contribute to a significant biological, cultural, geological, hazard, noise, or tribal cultural impacts. Based on the Project Description and the preceding responses, impacts related to the proposed Project are less than significant or can be reduced to less than significant levels with the incorporation of mitigation measures. The proposed Project's contribution to any significant cumulative impacts would be less than cumulatively considerable. Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. 4-136 PASTR1901 - Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <<06/18/20» 286 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? The proposed Project site is currently undeveloped and vacant, but it is in an urban area surrounded by a variety of residential and commercial uses. The proposed Project involves the construction of a 131-unit residential development with 4 commercial -ready units, a commercial space and various on -site amenities. The proposed Project includes a Development Code Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment to change the zoning classification figures from Community Commercial (CC) to Mixed Use (MU) District. If approved, the proposed Project would be consistent with City zoning and General Plan designations for the site. Based on the Project Description and the preceding responses, development of the proposed Project would not cause substantial adverse effects to human beings because all potentially significant impacts of the proposed Project can be mitigated to a less than significant level. Significance Determination: Potentially Significant Impact. Mitigation Measures: Refer to Mitigation Measures 1310-1, 1310-2, 1310-3, 1310-4, CUL-1, GEO-1, GEO-2, HAZ-1, N0I-1, N01-2, TCR-1, and TCR-2. Level of Significance after Mitigation: Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. PASTR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20)> 4-137 287 288 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION DUNE 2020 WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J 5.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM 5.1 MITIGATION MONITORING REQUIREMENTS PRC Section 21081.6 (enacted by the passage of AB 3180) mandates that the following requirements shall apply to all reporting or mitigation monitoring programs: • The public agency shall adopt a reporting or monitoring program for the changes made to the Project or conditions of Project approval in order to mitigate or avoid significant effects on the environment. The reporting or monitoring program shall be designed to ensure compliance during Project implementation. For those changes that have been required or incorporated into the Project at the request of a Responsible Agency or a public agency having jurisdiction by law over natural resources affected by the Project, that agency shall, if so requested by the Lead Agency or a Responsible Agency, prepare and submit a proposed reporting or monitoring program. • The Lead Agency shall specify the location and custodian of the documents or other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which its decision is based. A public agency shall provide the measures to mitigate or avoid significant effects on the environment that are fully enforceable through permit conditions, agreements, or other measures. Conditions of Project approval may be set forth in referenced documents which address required mitigation measures or, in the case of the adoption of a plan, policy, regulation, or other Project, by incorporating the mitigation measures into the plan, policy, regulation, or Project design. • Prior to the close of the public review period for a draft EIR or MND, a Responsible Agency, or a public agency having jurisdiction over natural resources affected by the Project, shall either submit to the Lead Agency complete and detailed performance objectives for mitigation measures which would address the significant effects on the environment identified by the Responsible Agency or agency having jurisdiction over natural resources affected by the Project, or refer the Lead Agency to appropriate, readily available guidelines or reference documents. Any mitigation measures submitted to a Lead Agency by a Responsible Agency or an agency having jurisdiction over natural resources affected by the Project shall be limited to measures that mitigate impacts to resources that are subject to the statutory authority of, and definitions applicable to, that agency. Compliance or noncompliance by a Responsible Agency or agency having jurisdiction over natural resources affected by a project with that requirement shall not limit that authority of the Responsible Agency or agency having jurisdiction over natural resources affected by a Project, or the authority of the Lead Agency, to approve, condition, or deny Projects as provided by this division or any other provision of law. 5.2 MITIGATION MONITORING PROCEDURES The mitigation monitoring and reporting program has been prepared in compliance with PRC Section 21081.6. The program describes the requirements and procedures to be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to ensure that all mitigation measures adopted as part of the proposed Project would be carried out as described in this IS/MND. Table 5.A lists each of the mitigation measures specified in this IS/MND and identifies the party or parties responsible for implementation and monitoring of each measure. PASTR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20)> 5_1 289 Le A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA JUNE 2020 Table 5.A: Mitigation and Monitoring Reporting Program Mitigation Measures and Regulatory Compliance Measures (RCM) Responsible Party Timing for RCM or Mitigation Measure 4.1: Aesthetics RCM-AES-1 Final Lighting and Photometric Plans. Prior to issuance of Director of the City of Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the Applicant shall submit Final Rancho Cucamonga a building permit Lighting and Photometric Plans for review and approval Planning Department, by the Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) or designee Planning Department, or designee. The lighting and photometric plans shall be prepared by a qualified engineer (i.e., an engineer who is an active member of the Illuminating Engineering Society of North America) and shall comply with applicable standards of the City's Municipal Code. The lighting plan shall address all aspects of lighting, including infrastructure, on -site driveways, recreation, safety, signage, and promotional lighting, if any. In accordance with Municipal Code Section 17.58, Outdoor Lighting Standards, the Final Photometric Plan shall show evidence that all lighting is shielded or recessed and directed downward and away from adjoining properties and rights -of -way. 4.2: Agriculture and Forest Resources The proposed Project would not result in significant adverse impacts related to agriculture. No mitigation would be required. 4.3: Air Quality The proposed Project would not result in significant adverse impacts related to air quality. No mitigation would be required. 4.4: Biological Resources 13I0-1 Delhi Sands Flower -Loving Fly Surveys. Prior to grading Project Applicant, Prior to grading or any or any other ground -disturbing activity, a qualified with verification by other ground -disturbing biologist (i.e., a permitted Delhi Sands flower -loving fly Director of the City of activity [DSF] biologist) shall conduct a survey for DSF habitat to Rancho Cucamonga determine if focused surveys for DSF are required. If Planning Department, focused DSF surveys are determined to be required, the or designee Project Applicant will be required to conduct focused DSF surveys in accordance with United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Interim General Survey Guidelines for the Delhi Sands Flower -Loving Fly (1996). USFWS protocol requires surveys to be conducted over the course of 2 consecutive years to confirm the absence of DSF. If no DSF habitat is observed on site during the pre -construction survey, a letter shall be prepared by the qualified biologist documenting the results of the survey. The letter shall be submitted to the Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department, or designee, prior to issuance of any grading permits, and no further action is required. If DSF is observed to be present on site during the pre -construction clearance survey, consultation with the USFWS shall occur to determine the next appropriate steps. Areas currently occupied by DSF habitat shall be avoided to the extent feasible. If DSF habitat cannot be avoided, replacement of habitat at a 1:1 ratio, or as required by the USFWS, shall be implemented. Project effects to DSF must be fully 5-2 P:\STR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx u06/18/20» 290 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J Table S.A: Mitigation and Monitoring Reporting Program Mitigation Measures and Regulatory Compliance Measures (RCM) Responsible Party Timing for RCM or Mitigation Measure mitigated through avoidance or the replacement of habitat on or off site in coordination with the USFWS and the Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department, or designee, prior to the issuance of any grading activities. BIO-2 Burrowing Owl Surveys. Prior to grading or any other Project Applicant, Prior to grading or any ground -disturbing activity, a qualified biologist shall with verification by other ground -disturbing conduct a habitat assessment for burrowing owls to Director of the City of activity determine if suitable burrowing owl habitat is present in Rancho Cucamonga and adjacent to the Project site. If suitable habitat is Planning Department, present, then focused breeding season surveys shall be or designee, and conducted consistent with the procedures outlined in CDFW Appendix D of the 2012 California Department of Fish and Wildlife Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (CDFW Staff Report). Regardless of whether burrowing owls are detected during focused breeding season surveys, a pre - construction survey shall be performed by a qualified biologist no less than 14 days prior to ground -disturbing activities. If no burrowing owls are observed on site during the pre -construction clearance survey, a letter shall be prepared by the qualified biologist documenting the results of the survey. The letter shall be submitted to the Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department, or designee, prior to issuance of any grading permits, and no further action is required. If presence of burrowing owl is determined either during the focused breeding season surveys or pre -construction surveys, the applicant shall contact CDFW prior to commencing project activities and conduct an impact assessment to determine appropriate mitigation in accordance with the CDFW Staff Report. If one or more burrowing owls are observed on site during the pre -construction clearance survey, and permanent avoidance of the owl(s) by the project is not feasible, then the occupied area shall be avoided with an appropriate setback buffer as determined by the qualified biologist until either the burrowing owl(s) can be excluded from the site (subject to CDFW approval) or the owls leave the site on their own. In accordance with the CDFW Staff Report, the size of the setback buffer should be in the range of 50 meters to 500 meters and will be determined through a combination of the extent of owl use (i.e., nesting sites versus non -breeding use), the time of year, and the level of disturbance. If burrowing owls cannot be avoided by the proposed Project a qualified biologist shall prepare and submit a P:\STR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20)> 5-3 291 Le A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA JUNE 2020 Table 5.A: Mitigation and Monitoring Reporting Program Mitigation Measures and Regulatory Compliance Measures (RCM) Responsible Party Timing for RCM or Mitigation Measure Burrowing Owl Exclusion Plan to CDFW in accordance with Appendix E of the CDFW Staff Report for review/approval prior to the commencement of disturbance activities onsite. Burrow exclusion involves the installation of one-way doors in burrow openings during the nonbreeding season to temporarily or permanently exclude burrowing owls and to close burrows after verifying through site monitoring and scoping that the burrows are empty. Existing or artificial burrows situated less than 75 meters from the Project site are the ideal scenario for successful passive relocation. Additional factors for successful passive relocation are included in the CDFW Staff Report; however, if adjacent lands are not available then alternate mitigation will be identified. When a qualified biologist determines that burrowing owls are no longer occupying the Project site and passive relocation is complete, construction activities may continue. A final letter report shall be prepared by the qualified biologist documenting the results of the passive relocation. The letter shall be submitted to CDFW and the Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department, or designee, prior to the issuance of any grading activities. If mitigation will include the conservation of adjacent or offsite lands for burrowing owls, then the Applicant will coordinate with CDFW and the City of Rancho Cucamonga to ensure that the permanent conservation and management of burrowing owl habitat is addressed such that the habitat acreage, number of burrows and burrowing owl impacts are replaced consistent with the CDFW Staff Report. A qualified biologist shall confirm that conservation lands contain natural unoccupied burrows at a 2:1 replacement ratio, or otherwise the biologist will construct artificial burrows for use by the owls. Monitoring and management of the replacement burrow site(s) shall be conducted and a reporting plan shall be prepared. The objective shall be to manage the replacement burrow sites for the benefit of burrowing owls (e.g., minimizing weed cover), with the specific goal of maintaining the functionality of the burrows for a minimum of 2 years. 13I0-3: Los Angeles Pocket Mouse and San Bernardino Project Applicant, Prior to grading or any Kangaroo Rat Surveys. Prior to grading or any other with verification by other ground -disturbing ground -disturbing activity, a qualified biologist (i.e., a Director of the City of activity permitted biologist allowed to handle the Los Angeles Rancho Cucamonga pocket mouse [LAPM] and the San Bernardino kangaroo Planning Department, rat [SBKR]) shall conduct a survey to identify suitable or designee, and habitat for the LAPM and the SBKR. Should suitable CDFW and USFWS habitat be identified on the site, the qualified biologist shall conduct a minimum of 5 nights of small mammal 5-4 P:\STR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx u06/18/20» 292 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J Table S.A: Mitigation and Monitoring Reporting Program Mitigation Measures and Regulatory Compliance Measures (RCM) Responsible Party Timing for RCM or Mitigation Measure trapping consecutively, in accordance with protocol established by the USFWS and the CDFW. A final letter report shall be prepared by the qualified biologist documenting the results of the survey and any mitigation measures that are recommended to be implemented as part of the Project, if such measures are required. The letter shall be submitted to the Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department, or designee, prior to the issuance of any grading activities. If the Los Angeles pocket mouse is identified on the site, the qualified mammal biologist shall provide an analysis to the City of Rancho Cucamonga as to whether the loss of occupied habitat would "have a substantial adverse effect" on the overall species to determine whether mitigation is warranted. If mitigation is necessary to offset a potentially significant impact, then mitigation of no less than 2:1 (replacement to impact) shall be required. Additionally, the Project Applicant/Developer shall prepare and implement a set of avoidance and minimization measures aimed at protecting special -status small mammals from project -related impacts. The proposed avoidance and minimization measures shall be provided to CDFW for review and approval no fewer than 30 days prior to the initiation of project activities. If the San Bernardino kangaroo rat is identified on the site, take authorization must be obtained from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), and so the Project Applicant/Developer shall consult with the USFWS. The USFWS shall identify measures to be taken to avoid or minimize adverse Project effects to these species and their habitat. Such measures may include, but are not limited to, the following: (1) avoidance of the occupied habitat, (2) enhancement of habitat, or (3) conservation of off -site suitable habitat, or any other measures as determined by USFWS. At present the SBKR is designated as a Candidate Endangered species under the California Endangered Species Act (CESA). If the SBKR is still protected under CESA at the time of construction, then in addition to take authorization from USFWS, an Incidental Take Permit (ITP) will be required from CDFW pursuant to Fish and Game Code Section 2080.1. If applicable, the Project Applicant/Developer will coordinate with CDFW to obtain an ITP, including to ensure that the habitat mitigation determined through consultation with USFWS will also satisfy CDFW. P:\STR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20)> 5-5 293 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 Table 5.A: Mitigation and Monitoring Reporting Program Mitigation Measures and Regulatory Compliance Measures (RCM) Responsible Party Timing for RCM or Mitigation Measure BIO-4 Non -listed Special -Status Reptiles. If construction will be Project Applicant, Prior to grading or any performed at a time of year when reptiles are active at with verification by other ground -disturbing the Project area, i.e. Spring or Summer, a qualified Director of the City of activity biologist shall visually survey the Project area prior to Rancho Cucamonga construction to identify any feature/habitats suitable to Planning Department, support special -status reptiles (i.e., burrows, dens, or designee cavities, debris, dead vegetation, rocks, loose soil, leaf litter, etc.). Where an identifiable feature is present, the qualified biologist shall mark the potentially occupied feature for avoidance. If avoidance is infeasible, the qualified biologist shall carefully dismantle the feature and allow any individuals discovered to move out of harm's way, if such efforts are determined to be feasible and reasonable by the biologist. RCM-13I0-1 Migratory Bird Treaty Act and Fish and Game Code Project Applicant, During construction, Section 3503. In the event that construction, vegetation with verification by vegetation, clearing, or clearing, or grading activities (including disking and Director of the City of grading activities demolition) should occur between February 1 and Rancho Cucamonga occurring between September 15, the Project Applicant/Developer (or its Planning Department, February 1 and contractor) shall retain a qualified biologist (i.e., a or designee September 15 and prior professional biologist who is familiar with local birds and to the commencement their nesting behaviors) to conduct a nesting bird survey of grading permits no more than 3 days prior to commencement of construction activities. The nesting survey shall include the Project site and areas immediately adjacent to the site that could potentially be affected by Project -related construction activities, such as noise, human activity, and dust, etc. If active nesting of birds is observed within 100 feet (ft) of the designated construction area prior to construction, the biologist shall establish suitable buffers around the active nests (e.g., as much as 500 ft for raptors and 300 ft for nonraptors [subject to the recommendations of the qualified biologist]), and the buffer areas shall be avoided until the nests are no longer occupied and the juvenile birds can survive independently from the nests. Prior to commencement of grading activities, the Director of the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department, or designee, shall verify that all Project grading and construction plans include specific documentation regarding the requirements stated above, that pre -construction surveys have been completed and the results reviewed by staff, and that the appropriate buffers (if needed) are noted on the plans and established in the field with orange snow fencing. RCM-BIO-2 Tree Replacement. Prior to issuance of grading permits Director of the City of Prior to the issuance of or the removal of any on -site trees, the City of Rancho Rancho Cucamonga grading permits Cucamonga (City) Planning Department Director, or Planning Department, designee, shall verify that the Project Applicant has or designee obtained tree removal permits in accordance with the provisions outlined in Section 17.16.080 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. As outlined in Section 5-6 P:\STR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20,, 294 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J Table S.A: Mitigation and Monitoring Reporting Program Mitigation Measures and Regulatory Compliance Measures (RCM) Responsible Party Timing for RCM or Mitigation Measure 17.16.080 of the City's Municipal Code, a tree removal permit shall by required for the removal of all heritage trees on private properties within Rancho Cucamonga, unless expressly stated in Section 17.16.080 (Exceptions). 4.5: Cultural Resources CUL-1 Archaeological Monitoring. Prior to the issuance of Project Applicant, Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the Applicant shall provide a letter to with verification by the first preliminary or the Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Director of the City of precise grading permit Department, or designee, from a qualified archaeologist Rancho Cucamonga (who meets Secretary of the Interior Standards)who has Planning Department, been retained to provide archaeological monitoring or designee during ground -disturbing Project activities. The archaeologist shall attend the pre -grading meeting to establish procedures for an archaeological monitoring program. Those procedures shall include provisions for temporarily halting or redirecting work to permit sampling, identification, and evaluation of resources deemed by the archaeologist to potentially be historical resources or unique archaeological resources. These procedures shall be submitted to, reviewed by, and approved by the Director of Planning, or designee, prior to issuance of the grading permit and prior to any surface disturbance on the Project site. The archaeological monitor will be present and on site during all ground - disturbing activities. Should any cultural resources be discovered, no further grading shall occur in the immediate vicinity of the discovery (precise area to be determined by the archaeologist in the field, but shall be at least 50 feet) until the Director of Planning, or designee, is satisfied that the appropriate treatment of the resource has occurred. Any finds dating to the pre - contact period shall be also assessed by a representative from the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians and from the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation to determine whether the find constitutes a "tribal cultural resource" as defined in PRC Section 21074 (as detailed in TRC-1). If significant pre -contact cultural resources, as defined by CEQA, are discovered and avoidance cannot be ensured, the archaeologist shall develop a Monitoring and Treatment Plan, the drafts of which shall be provided to the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians and the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation for review and comment, as detailed in TRC-1. An archaeological monitoring report shall be prepared following completion of archaeological monitoring, and a copy of the report shall be submitted to the South Central Coastal Information Center (SCCIC). P:\STR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20)> 5-7 295 Le A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA JUNE 2020 Table 5.A: Mitigation and Monitoring Reporting Program Mitigation Measures and Regulatory Compliance Measures (RCM) Responsible Party Timing for RCM or Mitigation Measure RCM-CUL-1 Human Remains. In the event that human remains are Project Applicant, During construction encountered on the Project site, work within 50 feet of with verification by the discovery shall be redirected and the County Coroner Director of the City of notified immediately, consistent with the requirements Rancho Cucamonga of California Code of Regulations (CCR) Section Planning Department, 15064.5(e). State Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 or designee states that no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code (PRC) Section 5097.98. If the remains are determined to be Native American, the County Coroner shall notify the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), which shall determine and notify a Most Likely Descendant (MILD). With the permission of the property owner, the MLD may inspect the site of the discovery. The MLD shall complete the inspection and make recommendations or preferences for treatment within 48 hours of being granted access to the site. The MLD recommendations may include scientific removal and nondestructive analysis of human remains and items associated with Native American burials, preservation of Native American human remains and associated items in place, relinquishment of Native American human remains and associated items to the descendants for treatment, or any other culturally appropriate treatment. Consistent with CCR Section 15064.5(d), if the remains are determined to be Native American and an MILD is notified, the City shall consult with the MILD as identified by the NAHC to develop an agreement for treatment and disposition of the remains. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department, or designee, shall verify that all grading plans specify the requirements of CCR Section 15064.5(e), State Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5, and PRC Section 5097.98, as stated above. 4.6: Energy The proposed Project would not result in significant adverse impacts related to energy. No mitigation would be required. 4.7: Geology and Soils GEO-1 Compliance with the Recommendations in the Project Applicant During construction Geotechnical Study. All grading operations and with verification of construction shall be conducted in conformance with all City of Rancho of the recommendations included in the geotechnical Cucamonga City document prepared by Leighton and Associates, Inc., Engineer, or designee titled Geotechnical Investigation, Proposed Residential Development, West of East Avenue and Approximately 500 Feet North of Foothill Boulevard, APN 1100-191-04- 000, City of Rancho Cucamonga (October 5, 2016). Recommendations found in the geotechnical document address topics including, but not limited to: Sj-g P:\STR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx u06/18/20» 296 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C A JUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J A Table S.A: Mitigation and Monitoring Reporting Program Mitigation Measures and Regulatory Compliance Measures (RCM) Responsible Party Timing for RCM or Mitigation Measure • General earthwork and grading, including site preparations, over -excavation and re -compaction, fill placement and compaction, importing of fill soil, shrinkage and subsidence, rippability, and oversized material; • Foundations, including minimum embedment and width, allowable bearing, lateral load resistance, increase in bearing and friction, and settlement estimates; • Slabs -on -grade, including subgrade moisture conditioning, concrete and structural design thickness, and slab underlayment for moisture vapor retarding; • Seismic design parameters; • Retaining walls; • Pavement design; and • Infiltration testing. Additional site grading, foundation, and utility plans shall be reviewed by the Project Geotechnical Consultant prior to construction to check for conformance with all of the recommendations of the Geotechnical Investigation (Leighton 2016). Grading plan review shall also be conducted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) City Engineer, or designee, prior to the start of grading to verify that requirements developed during the preparation of geotechnical documents have been appropriately incorporated into the Project plans. Design, grading, and construction shall be performed in accordance with the requirements of the City Building Code and the California Building Code (CBC) applicable at the time of grading, as well as the recommendations of the Project Geotechnical Consultant as summarized in the final Geotechnical Report subject to review by the City Engineer, or designee, prior to the start of grading activities. The final Geotechnical Report shall present the results of observation and testing done during grading activities. GEO-2 Unknown Paleontological Resources. In the event that Project Applicant, During construction paleontological resources are encountered during Project with verification by excavation activities, work in the immediate area of the Director of the City of find shall be redirected and a paleontologist shall be Rancho Cucamonga contacted to assess the find for significance and make Planning Department, recommendations regarding further paleontological or designee mitigation as needed. If Project plans change to include excavation below a depth of 15 feet (ft), a paleontologist shall be hired to develop a Paleontological Resources Impact Mitigation Program (PRIMP) for this Project. The PRIMP shall include the methods that will be used to protect paleontological resources that may exist within the Project site, as well as procedures for monitoring, fossil preparation and identification, curation into a P:\STR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx «06/18/20» 5-9 297 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 Table 5.A: Mitigation and Monitoring Reporting Program Mitigation Measures and Regulatory Compliance Measures (RCM) Responsible Party Timing for RCM or Mitigation Measure repository, and preparation of a final report at the conclusion of grading. Excavation and grading activities in deposits with high paleontological sensitivity (Very Young Alluvial Fan Deposits and Young Alluvial Fan Deposits, Unit 1 below a depth of 15 ft) shall be monitored by a paleontological monitor following a PRIMP. No monitoring is required for excavation in deposits with low paleontological sensitivity (Very Young Alluvial Fan Deposits and Young Alluvial Fan Deposits, Unit 1 from the surface to a depth of 15 ft). 4.8: Greenhouse Gas Emissions The proposed Project would not result in significant adverse impacts related to greenhouse gas emissions. No mitigation would be required. 4.9: Hazards and Hazardous Materials HAZ-1 Construction Staging and Traffic Management Plan. Project Applicant, Prior to the issuance of Prior to issuance of a grading permit, a Construction with verification by a grading permit Staging and Traffic Management Plan shall be prepared Director of the City of for approval by the Director of the City of Rancho Rancho Cucamonga Cucamonga Public Works Department, or designee. The Public Works, or Construction Staging and Traffic Management Plan shall designee also include the name and phone number of a contact person who can be reached 24 hours per day regarding construction traffic complaints or emergency situations. The Construction Staging and Traffic Management Plan may include, but not be limited to, the following: • Temporary lane closures shall be implemented consistent with the recommendations of the California Joint Utility Traffic Control Manual. • Flagpersons in adequate numbers shall be provided to minimize impacts to traffic flow and to ensure safe access into and out of the site. • Flagpersons shall be trained to assist in emergency response by restricting or controlling the movement of traffic that could interfere with emergency vehicle access. • All emergency access to the Project site and adjacent areas shall be kept clear and unobstructed during all phases of demolition and construction. • Safety precautions shall be provided for pedestrians and bicyclists through such measures as alternate routing and protection barriers. • Construction -related deliveries other than concrete and earthwork -related deliveries shall be scheduled so as to reduce travel during peak travel periods (i.e., 6:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. and 3:30 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. Monday through Friday). • The construction contractor shall coordinate with other construction projects in the vicinity to minimize conflicts. • If necessary, a California Department of 5-10 P:\STR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20,, 298 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J Table S.A: Mitigation and Monitoring Reporting Program Mitigation Measures and Regulatory Compliance Measures (RCM) Responsible Party Timing for RCM or Mitigation Measure Transportation (Caltrans) transportation permit shall be obtained for use of oversized transport vehicles on Caltrans facilities. • If necessary, a traffic management plan shall be submitted to Caltrans for review and approval. • Construction vehicles, including construction personnel vehicles, shall not park on public streets, including streets outside Rancho Cucamonga. • Construction vehicles shall not stage or queue where they interfere with pedestrian and vehicular traffic or block access to nearby businesses. • If feasible, any traffic lane closures shall be limited to off-peak traffic periods, as approved by the City of Rancho Cucamonga Department of Public Works. • The Rancho Cucamonga Police Department shall be notified a minimum of 48 hours in advance of any lane closures or other roadway work. 4.10: Hydrology and Water Quality RCM-WQ-1 Construction General Permit. Prior to issuance of a Project Applicant, Prior to the issuance of grading permit, the Applicant shall obtain coverage under with verification by a grading permit the State Water Resources Control Board National Director of the City of Pollutant Discharge Elimination System General Permit Rancho Cucamonga for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Construction Public Works, or and Land Disturbance Activities (Order No. 2009-0009- designee DWQ, National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System No. CAS000002, as amended by Orders No. 2010-0014- DWQ and 2012-0006-DWQ) (Construction General Permit). This shall include submission of Permit Registration Documents (PRDs), including a Notice of Intent (NOI) for coverage under the permit to the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) via the Stormwater Multiple Application and Report Tracking System (SMARTS). The Applicant shall provide the Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID) to the City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) to demonstrate proof of coverage under the Construction General Permit. A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be prepared and implemented for the proposed Project in compliance with the requirements of the Construction General Permit. The SWPPP shall identify construction best management practices (BMPs) to be implemented to ensure that the potential for soil erosion and sedimentation is minimized and to control the discharge of pollutants in stormwater runoff as a result of construction activities. Upon completion of construction and stabilization of the site, a Notice of Termination will be submitted via SMARTS. P:\STR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20)> 5-11 299 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 Table 5.A: Mitigation and Monitoring Reporting Program Mitigation Measures and Regulatory Compliance Measures (RCM) Responsible Party Timing for RCM or Mitigation Measure RCM-WQ-2: Water Quality Management Plan. Prior to the issuance Project Applicant, Prior to the issuance of of any grading or building permits, the Applicant shall with verification by grading or building submit a Final Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Director of the City of permits to the City Engineer, or designee, for review and approval Rancho Cucamonga in compliance with the requirements of Section Public Works, or 19.20.260 of the City's Municipal Code and the Waste designee Discharge Requirements for the San Bernardino County Flood Control District, the County of San Bernardino, and the Incorporated Cities of San Bernardino County within the Santa Ana Region (Order No. R8-2010-0036, NPDES No. CAS618036) (San Bernardino County MS4 Permit). The Final WQMP shall be prepared consistent with the requirements of the Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans (June 2013) and the Water Quality Management Plan template, or subsequent guidance manuals. The Final WQMP shall specify the BMPs to be incorporated into the Project design to target pollutants of concern in runoff from the Project area. The City shall ensure that the BMPs specified in the Final WQMP are incorporated into the final Project design. RCM-WQ-3: Final Hydrology and Hydraulic Analysis. The Applicant Project Applicant, Prior to the issuance of shall submit a Final Hydrology Study to the City of Rancho with verification by grading or building Cucamonga Director of Engineering, or his/her designee, Director of the City of permits for review and approval prior to issuance of grading and Rancho Cucamonga building permits. The Final Hydrology Study shall Public Works, or demonstrate that the on -site drainage facilities are designee designed and adequately sized to convey and reduce runoff, such that on -site and off -site drainage facility capacity would not be exceeded during a design storm. 4.11: land Use and Planning The proposed Project would not result in significant adverse impacts related to land use and planning. No mitigation would be required. 4.12: Mineral Resources The proposed Project would not result in significant adverse impacts related to mineral resources. No mitigation would be required. 4.13: Noise N0I-1 Construction Noise and Vibration: Prior to issuance of Director of the Prior to issuance of building permits, the Director of the City of Rancho Rancho Cucamonga building permits Cucamonga (City) Planning Department, or designee, Planning Department, shall verify that grading and construction plans include or designee the following requirements: • If the future residential land use immediately south of the Project site is fully built and occupied at the time of Project construction, install minimum 9-foot-high temporary construction noise barriers at the Project's southern site boundary for the duration of mobile - equipment construction activities. The noise control barriers must present a solid face from top to bottom. The noise control barriers must meet the minimum 5-12 P:\STR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20,, 300 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C A JUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J A Table S.A: Mitigation and Monitoring Reporting Program Mitigation Measures and Regulatory Compliance Measures (RCM) Responsible Party Timing for RCM or Mitigation Measure height and be constructed as follows: o The barriers shall provide a minimum transmission loss of 20 A -weighted decibels (dBA). The noise barrier shall be constructed using an acoustical blanket (e.g., vinyl acoustic curtains or quilted blankets) attached to the construction site perimeter fence or equivalent temporary fence posts. o The noise barrier must be maintained and any damage promptly repaired. Gaps, holes, or weaknesses in the barrier or openings between the barrier and the ground shall be promptly repaired. o The noise control barrier and associated elements shall be completely removed and the site appropriately restored upon conclusion of the construction activity. • Prior to approval of grading plans and/or issuance of building permits, plans shall include a note indicating that noise -generating Project construction activities shall only occur between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. on weekdays, including on Saturdays, with no activity allowed on Sundays and holidays. • During all Project site construction, the construction contractors shall equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly operating and maintained mufflers, consistent with manufacturers' standards. The construction contractor shall place all stationary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from the noise -sensitive receptors nearest the Project site. • The construction contractor shall locate equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction -related noise sources and noise -sensitive receivers nearest the Project site (i.e., to the center) during all Project construction. The construction contractor shall limit haul truck deliveries to the same hours specified for construction equipment (between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. on weekdays, including on Saturdays, with no activity allowed on Sundays and holidays). The contractor shall prepare a haul route exhibit and shall design delivery routes to minimize the exposure of sensitive land uses or residential dwellings to delivery truck -related noise. N0I-2 Interior Noise Mitigation: To satisfy the City's 45 dBA Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) interior noise level criteria, units facing Foothill Boulevard and East Avenue will require a noise reduction of up to 25.5 dBA and a windows -closed condition requiring a means of mechanical ventilation (e.g., air conditioning). To meet P:\STR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx «06/18/20» 5-13 301 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 Table 5.A: Mitigation and Monitoring Reporting Program Mitigation Measures and Regulatory Compliance Measures (RCM) Responsible Party Timing for RCM or Mitigation Measure the City's 45 dBA CNEL interior noise standards, the Project shall provide the following or equivalent noise mitigation measures: • Windows: o All windows and sliding glass doors shall be well - fitted, well -weather-stripped assemblies and shall have the following minimum sound transmission class (STC) ratings: • Windows facing East Avenue in Buildings 1, 2, 3, and 10 require upgraded windows with a minimum STC rating of 29. ■ All other buildings require standard windows with minimum STC ratings of27. • Doors: All exterior doors shall be well -weather- stripped, solid -core assemblies at least 1.75 inches thick. • Walls: At any penetrations of exterior walls by pipes, ducts, or conduits, the space between the wall and pipes, ducts, or conduits shall be caulked or filled with mortar to form an airtightseal. • Roof: Roof sheathing of wood construction shall be well -fitted or caulked plywood of at least 0.5 inch thick. Ceilings shall be well -fitted, fully sealed gypsum board of at least 0.5 inch thick. Insulation with at least a rating of R-19 shall be used in the attic space. • Ventilation: Arrangements for any habitable room shall be such that any exterior door or window can be kept closed when the room is in use and still receive circulated air. A forced air circulation system (e.g., air conditioning) or active ventilation system (e.g., fresh air supply) shall be provided that satisfies the requirements of the Uniform Building Code. • Notices: Occupancy disclosure notices are recommended for all future tenants of the residential units within the Project site. The disclosure notices should state that the units may be exposed to infrequent noise events from the adjacent Cucamonga Valley Water District well site. 4.14: Population and Housing The proposed Project would not result in significant adverse impacts related to population and housing. No mitigation would be required. 4.15: Public Services RCM-PS-1 Payment of Police Impact Fee. Prior to issuance of Project Applicant, Prior to the issuance of building permits, the Director of the City of Rancho with verification by building permits Cucamonga Planning Department, or designee, shall Director of the City of confirm that the Project Applicant/Developer has paid all Rancho Cucamonga required Police Impact Fees in accordance with Section Public Works, or 3.64, Police Impact Fee, of the Rancho Cucamonga designee Municipal Code. 5-14 P:\STR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20,, 302 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J Table S.A: Mitigation and Monitoring Reporting Program Mitigation Measures and Regulatory Compliance Measures (RCM) Responsible Party Timing for RCM or Mitigation Measure RCM-PS-2 Payment of School Development Fee. Pursuant to Project Applicant, Prior to the issuance of California Education Code Section 17620(a)(1), the with verification by building permits governing board of any school district is authorized to Director of the City of levy a fee, charge, dedication, or other requirement Rancho Cucamonga against any construction within the boundaries of the Public Works, or district for the purpose of funding the construction or designee reconstruction of school facilities. Prior to issuance of building permits, the Project Applicant/Developer shall submit proof of payment of all applicable school facility development fees to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Director of Planning, or designee. RCM-PS-3 Payment of Park Impact Fee. Prior to the issuance of Project Applicant Prior to the issuance of building permits, the Director of the City of Rancho verification by building permits Cucamonga Planning Department, or designee, shall Director of the City of confirm that the Project Applicant/Developer has paid all Rancho Cucamonga required park in-lieu/park impact fees as established in Public Works, or Chapter 3.68.030 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal designee Code. RCM-PS-4 Payment of Library Impact Fee. Prior to the issuance of Project Applicant Prior to the issuance of building permits, the Director of the City of Rancho verification by building permits Cucamonga Planning Department, or designee, shall Director of the City of confirm that the Project Applicant/Developer has paid all Rancho Cucamonga required Library Impact Fees as established in Section Public Works, or 3.56 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. designee 4.16: Recreation RCM-REC-1 Dedication Fees. Prior to the issuance of building Project Applicant, Prior to the issuance of permits, the Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga with verification by building permits Planning Department, or designee, shall confirm that the Director of the City of Project Applicant/Developer has paid all required in -lieu Rancho Cucamonga park fees and community and recreation center fees as Public Works, or required by Section 3.52 of the Rancho Cucamonga designee Municipal Code. 4.17: Transportation RCM-TR-1 Emergency Access Standards. Prior to the issuance of a Project Applicant, Prior to the issuance of building permit, the Applicant shall submit Final with verification by a building permit Circulation Design and Emergency Access Plans for review Director of the City of and approval by the Director of the City of Rancho Rancho Cucamonga Cucamonga (City) Planning Department, or designee, the Public Works, or Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (RCFPD), and designee the San Bernardino Sheriff's Department (SBSD). The plans shall comply with all applicable City, RCFPD, and SBSD standards for appropriate emergency access. The plans shall address all aspects of ingress to and egress from the Project site and the on -site circulation system, including the width of all Project driveways and on -site roadways to ensure that the minimum acceptable turning radius required to accommodate emergency response vehicles is provided, and shall identify the location of all access gates, Knox boxes, and fire suppression facilities. In accordance with City, RCFPD, and SBSD standards, the Final Circulation Design and Emergency Access Plan shall P:\STR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20)> 5-15 303 Le A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA JUNE 2020 Table 5.A: Mitigation and Monitoring Reporting Program Mitigation Measures and Regulatory Compliance Measures (RCM) Responsible Party Timing for RCM or Mitigation Measure show evidence that all Project access points and the on - site circulation system are designed in accordance with all applicable emergency access standards to ensure adequate emergency responder accessibility to the Project site. 4.18: Tribal Cultural Resources TCR-1 Native American Monitoring. Prior to commencement of Director of the City of Prior to grading activities, the Director of the City of Rancho Rancho Cucamonga commencement of any Cucamonga Planning Department, or designee, shall Planning Department grubbing or grading confirm that a qualified Native American monitor has or designee activities/prior to been contacted and will be allowed access to the project commencement of any site to provide Native American monitoring services surface disturbance on during ground -disturbing project construction activities. the Project site The Native American monitor shall be selected by the City from the list of certified Native American monitors maintained by the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation. —The selected Native American monitor(s) shall be invited to the pre -grading conference to establish procedures for tribal cultural resource surveillance. Monitoring procedures shall include provisions for temporarily halting or redirecting work and creating a 50- foot buffer zone area to permit sampling, identification, and evaluation of resources deemed by the Native American monitor(s) to be tribal cultural resources as defined in Public Resources Code (PRC) Section 21074. Construction activities can continue outside of this buffer zone area. These monitoring procedures shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) Planning Department, or designee, prior to commencement of any surface disturbance on the project site. The Native American monitor(s) shall complete monitoring logs on a daily basis that provide descriptions of the daily activities, including construction activities, locations, soil, and any cultural materials identified. The Native American monitor(s) shall also provide insurance certificates, including liability insurance, meeting or exceeding requirements specified by the Applicant. The on -site monitoring shall cease when project grading and excavation activities are completed, or when the tribal representatives and monitor(s) have indicated that the site has a low potential for tribal cultural resources. 5-16 P:\STR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx u06/18/20» 304 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C A JUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J A Table S.A: Mitigation and Monitoring Reporting Program Mitigation Measures and Regulatory Compliance Measures (RCM) Responsible Party Timing for RCM or Mitigation Measure TCR-2 Previously Unknown Tribal Cultural Resources. Prior to Director of the City of Prior to commencement of grading activities, the Director of the Rancho Cucamonga commencement of any City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department, or Planning Department grubbing or grading designee, shall verify that all Project grading and or designee activities/prior to construction plans include requirements specifying that if commencement of any tribal cultural resources are discovered during surface disturbance on excavation, grading, or construction activities, work shall the Project site cease within 50 feet of the find until a qualified archaeologist (who meets Secretary of the Interior Standards) has evaluated the find in accordance with federal, State, and local guidelines to determine whether the find constitutes a "unique archaeological resource" as defined in Section 21083.2(g) of the California Public Resources Code (PRC). If the find is determined to be a unique archaeological resource, the found deposits shall be treated in accordance with federal, State, and local guidelines, including, but not limited to, those set forth in PRC Section 21083.2. Any finds dating to the pre -contact period shall be also assessed by a representative from the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians (who have requested to be given the opportunity to provide input with regards to significance and treatment of pre -contact finds) and from the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation to determine whether the find constitutes a "tribal cultural resource" as defined in PRC Section 21074. If the find is determined to be a tribal cultural resource, a representative from the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians and from the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation shall coordinate the treatment and curation of these resources with the Project Applicant/ Developer and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Should the find be deemed significant, as defined by CEQA, a cultural resources Monitoring and Treatment Plan (Plan) shall be created by the archaeologist, in coordination with the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians and Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation, and all subsequent finds shall be subject to this Plan. This Plan shall allow for a Native American monitor from the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation to continue to be present and for a Native American monitor from the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians to be present for the remainder of the Project, should the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians elect to place a monitor on -site. Construction personnel of the proposed Project shall not collect or move any archaeological or tribal cultural resources and associated materials. Construction activity may continue unimpeded on other portions of the Project site during assessment and treatment of tribal cultural resources. Any and all archaeological/cultural documents and records created as part of the Project shall be supplied to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for dissemination to the P:\STR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx «06/18/20» 5-17 305 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 Table 5.A: Mitigation and Monitoring Reporting Program Mitigation Measures and Regulatory Compliance Measures (RCM) Responsible Party Timing for RCM or Mitigation Measure San Manuel Band of Mission Indians and to the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall, in good faith, consult with the two tribes throughout the life of the Project. 4.19: Utilities and Service Systems RCM-UTL-1 Landscape Water Efficiency Ordinance. Prior to the Director of the City of Prior to the issuance of issuance of a grading permit, the City of Rancho Rancho Cucamonga a grading permit Cucamonga's Director of Planning, or designee, shall Planning Department confirm that the Final Landscaping Plan for the proposed or designee Project is consistent with all applicable provisions outlined in the City's Landscape Water Efficiency Ordinance. 4.20: Wildfire RCM-FIRE-1: Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Standard 49- Director of the City of Prior to the issuance of 1. The Project shall adhere to the requirements of Rancho Cucamonga any construction Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (RCFPD) Planning Department permits Standard 49-1. The fire protection plan shall be approved or designee by RCFPD and recorded on the parcel prior to the issuance of any construction permits. In addition, Vegetation Management Zone 1 Fuel Modification is required to be completed before construction with combustible materials will be approved. The required fuel modification is required to be maintained for the duration of the construction. 4.21: Mandatory Findings of Significance The proposed Project would not result in any significant adverse impacts to mandatory findings of significance. No mitigation would be required. 5.18 PASTR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20,, 306 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION DUNE 2020 6.0 LIST OF PREPARERS 6.1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Tabe van der Zwaag 6.2 LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. Nicole Dubois, Principal, Environmental Nicole West, CPSWQ, QSD/QSP, Associate, Environmental Alyssa Helper, Senior Environmental Planner J.T. Stephens, Senior Noise Specialist Arthur Black, Associate, Transportation Elise Miller, Assistant Environmental Planner Abby Annicchiarico, Assistant Environmental Planner Gary Dow, Associate, Graphics Matt Phillips, Graphics Technician Tom Flahive, Senior GIS Specialist Justin Roos, Associate, GIS Jennette Bosseler, Senior Editor/Word Processor Chantik Virgil, Senior Word Processor Steve Dong, Senior Editor W ESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J PASTR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20)> 6.1 307 Le A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA JUNE 2020 This page intentionally left blank 6.2 P:\STR1901 - West bury\IInitial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx «06/18/20» 308 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J 7.0 REFERENCES CAL FIRE. 2012. Fire Hazard Severity Zone Viewer. Website: https://egis.fire.ca.gov/FHSZ/ (accessed June 22, 2019). California Aquatic Resources Inventory. 2016. EcoAtlas: Existing Aquatic Resources. Website: https://www.ecoatlas.org/regions/ecoregion/south-coast (accessed June 13, 2019). California Air Resources Board. 2017. California's 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan: The Strategy for Achieving California's 2030 Greenhouse Gas Target. 2020. MSEI - Documentation - Off -Road - Diesel Equipment. Website: https:Hww2.arb. ca.gov/our-work/programs/mobile-source-emissions-inventory/road-documentation/msei- documentation-road (accessed March 2020). California Department of Conservation. 1976. Division of Mines and Geology. Special Report 113: Geologic Hazards in Southwestern San Bernardino County, California. 2016. California Important Farmland Finder. Website: https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/ DLRP/CIFF/ (accessed May 9, 2019). 2017. Division of Land Resource Protection. State of California Williamson Act Contract Land. 2018. Division of Mines and Geology. Mineral Land Classification Map. Special Report 143 Plate 7.1, 1983. n.d. California Geological Survey. California Earthquake Hazards Zone Application. Earthquake Zones of Required Investigation Website: https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/ cgs/EQZApp/app/ (Accessed March 9, 2020). California Department of Finance. 2019. E-5 Population and Housing Estimates for Cities, Counties, and the State, 2011-2019 with 2010 Census Benchmark City/County Population and Housing Estimates. May. California Department of Forestry and Fire (CAL FIRE). 2012. Fire Hazard Severity Zones Webviewer. Website: https://egis.fire.ca.gov/FHSZ/ (accessed June 22, 2019.) California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). California Scenic Highway Mapping System (San Bernardino County). Website: http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LandArch/16_livability/scenic_ highways/ (accessed May 6, 2019). California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle). 2016. Estimated Solid Waste Generation Rates. Website: https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/WasteCharacterization/ Genera l/Rates#Residential (accessed June 19, 2019). PASTR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20)> 7-1 309 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION JUNE 2020 California Department of Water Resources. 2016. SIGMA Basin Prioritization Dashboard, Groundwater Basins 2016. Website: https:Hgis.water.ca.gov/app/bp-dashboard/p2/ (accessed June 10, 2019). 2020. "Groundwater Sustainability Plans." Website: https://water.ca.gov/Programs/ Groundwater-Management/SGMA-Groundwater-Management/Groundwater-Sustainability- Plans (accessed March 8, 2020). California Energy Commission. 2018. Energy Consumption Data Management Service. Electricity Consumption by County. Website: http://www.ecdms.energy.ca.gov/elecbycounty.aspx (accessed March 2020). 2019.2019 Integrated Energy Policy Report. California Energy Commission. Docket # 19-IEPR- 01. Chaffey Joint Union High School District. 2011. Boundary Map. 2018. About the District. Chino Basin Watermaster. 2019a. Sustainable Groundwater Management Act. 2019b. Overview. Website: http://www.cbwm.org/overview.htm (accessed June 11, 2019). City of Ontario. 2011. LA/Ontario International Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan. Website: http://www.ontarioplan.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/pdfs/ALUCP_FULL.pdf (accessed June 11, 2019). City of Rancho Cucamonga. 2010a. General Plan. Chapter 2: Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources. 2010b. General Plan. Chapter 3: Community Mobility. Website: https://www.cityofrc.us/ civicax/filebank/blobd load. aspx?BIobID=6814 (accessed June 11, 2019). 2010c. General Plan EIR. Chapter 4.7: Geology and Soils. Website: https://www.cityofrc.us/ civicax/filebank/blobdload.aspx?BIobID=7601 (accessed May 6, 2019). 2010d. General Plan EIR. Chapter 4.15: Parks and Recreation. Website: https://www.cityofrc.us/civicax/filebank/blobdload.aspx?BIobID=7609 (accessed June 7, 2019). 2010e. General Plan EIR. Chapter 4.16: Traffic and Transportation. Website: https://www.cityofrc.us/civicax/filebank/blobd load. aspx?BIobID=7610 (accessed May 13, 2019). 2010f. General Plan EIR. Chapter 4.17: Utilities and Service Systems. Website: https://www.cityofrc.us/civicax/filebank/blobd load. aspx?BIobID=7611 (accessed June 13, 2019). 7-2 PASTR1901 - Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <<06/18/20» 310 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J 2010g. General Plan. Chapter 6: Resource Conservation Element. Website: https://www.cityofrc.us/civicax/filebank/blobd load. aspx?BIobID=6817 (accessed May 6, 2019). 2010h. General Plan Chapter 8: Public Health and Safety. Website: https://www.cityofrc.us/ civicax/filebank/blobd load. aspx?Blob ID=6819 (accessed June 11, 2019). 2010i. Overview of Departmental Operating Budgets. Website: https://www.cityofrc.us/c ivicax/filebank/blobdload.aspx?blobid=5560 (accessed June 17, 2019). 2010j. Public Facilites and Infrastructure Element. 2013. Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. Website: https://www.cityofrc.us/civicax/filebank/ blobdload.aspx?BIobID=5780 (accessed May 13, 2019). 2014. Development Impact Fee Study Report. . 2015. Ready RC: Before, During and After an Emergency in Rancho Cucamonga. . 2017. Sustainable Community Action Plan. . 2019a. Etiwanda Heights Neighborhood & Conservation Plan. . 2019b. Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. Cucamonga Valley Water District. 2018. About Us. Website: https://www.cvwdwater.com/35/ About -Us (accessed June 12, 2019). 2015. Urban Water Management Plan. Website: https://www.cvwdwater.com/ DocumentCenter/View/1955/2015-Urban-Water-Management-Plan--- CVWD?bidld= (accessed June 14, 2019). County of San Bernardino. 2013. Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans. Appendix F: HCOC Exemption Criteria and Map. 2019a. Countywide Plan Draft EIR. Website: http://countywideplan.com/wp-content/ uploads/2019/06/Ch_05-18-USS.pdf (accessed June 17, 2019). 2019b. Countywide Plan Draft EIR. Section 5.18: Utilities and Service Systems. Etiwanda School District. 2017. Attendance Boundaries. Effective July 1, 2017. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Draft National Flood Hazard Viewer. Website: https://fema.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=29f87515702d4845a906 419b287e2049 (accessed May 29, 2019). Fehr & Peers. 2018. Westbury Transportation Impact Analysis. PASTR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20)> 7-3 311 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 Governor's Office of Planning and Research (OPR). 2018. Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA. Leighton and Associates, Inc. 2016. Geotechnical Investigation, Proposed Residential Development, West of East Avenue and Approximately 500 Feet North of Foothill Boulevard, APN 1100- 191-04-000, City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. October. Omnitrans. 2019. System Map. Website: http://www.omnitrans.org/schedules/pdf/system-map/ Omnitrans_System_Map_0519.pdf (accessed June 20, 2010). San Bernardino Association of Governments (SANBAG). 2016. San Bernardino County Congestion Management Program. Southern California Association of Governments. 2016-2040 RTP/SCS Final Growth Forecast by Jurisdiction. South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). 2008. Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology. July. 1993. CEQA Air Quality Handbook. Website: http://www.agmd.gov/home/rules- compliance/ceqa/air-quality-analysis-handbook/ceqa-air-quality-handbook-(1993) (accessed June 24, 2019). 2018. Fact Sheet for Applying CaIEEMod to Localized Significance Thresholds. Website: www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/ localized -significance -thresholds/ caleemod-guidance.pdf (accessed February 2018). Transportation Research Board. 2016. Highway Capacity Manual. (HCM), 61" Edition. United States Census Bureau. 2010 Census, Table DP-1. . 2013-2017 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates, Table DP05. American Fact Finder. Rancho Cucamonga, California 2018 Population Estimate. United States Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration. 2017. Website: https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1917/1917.28AppA (accessed June 14, 2019). United States Fish and Wildlife Service. Critical Habitat for Threatened & Endangered Species Webviewer. Website: https:Hfws-maps.arcgis.com/home/webmap/viewer.html?webmap= 9d8de5e265ad4fe09893cf75b8dbfb77 (accessed May 24, 2019). 2020. National Wetlands Inventory. Webviewer: https://www.fws.gov/wetlands/data/ Mapper.html. 7-4 PASTR1901 - Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <<06/18/20» 312 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J United States Geological Survey. U.S. Quaternary Faults Webviewer. Website: https://usgs. maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=5a6O38b3al68456la9bOaadf88412fcf (accessed March 9, 2020). PASTR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20)> 7_5 313 Le A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA JUNE 2020 This page intentionally left blank 7_6 P:\STR1901 - West bury\IInitial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx «06/18/20» 314 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C A JUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J `L` APPENDIX A AIR QUALITY AND GREENHOUSE GAS REPORT P:\STR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean. docx a06/18/20» 315 Le A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA JUNE 2020 This page intentionally left blank P:\STR1901 - West bury\IInitial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx «06/18/20» 316 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C A JUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J `L` APPENDIX B BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT P:\STR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean. docx a06/18/20» 317 Le A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA JUNE 2020 This page intentionally left blank P:\STR1901 - West bury\IInitial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx «06/18/20» 318 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C A JUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J `L` APPENDIX C ARBORIST REPORT P:\STR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean. docx a06/18/20» 319 Le A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA JUNE 2020 This page intentionally left blank P:\STR1901 - West bury\IInitial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx «06/18/20» 320 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C A JUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J `L` APPENDIX D CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT P:\STR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean. docx a06/18/20» 321 Le A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA JUNE 2020 This page intentionally left blank P:\STR1901 - West bury\IInitial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx «06/18/20» 322 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C A JUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J `L` APPENDIX E PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT P:\STR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean. docx a06/18/20» 323 Le A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA JUNE 2020 This page intentionally left blank P:\STR1901 - West bury\IInitial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx «06/18/20» 324 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C A JUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J `L` APPENDIX F GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION P:\STR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean. docx <06/18/20,> 325 Le A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA JUNE 2020 This page intentionally left blank P:\STR1901 - West bury\IInitial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx «06/18/20» 326 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C A JUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J `L` APPENDIX G PHASE 1 ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT P:\STR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean. docx a06/18/20» 327 Le A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA JUNE 2020 This page intentionally left blank P:\STR1901 - West bury\IInitial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx «06/18/20» 328 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C A JUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J `L` APPENDIX H PRELIMINARY WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN P:\STR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean. docx a06/18/20» 329 Le A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA JUNE 2020 This page intentionally left blank P:\STR1901 - West bury\IInitial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx «06/18/20» 330 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C A JUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J `L` APPENDIX I NOISE IMPACT ANALYSIS P:\STR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean. docx a06/18/20» 331 Le A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA JUNE 2020 This page intentionally left blank P:\STR1901 - West bury\IInitial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx «06/18/20» 332 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C A JUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J `L` APPENDIX J WESTBURY TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY P:\STR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean. docx a06/18/20» 333 Le A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA JUNE 2020 This page intentionally left blank P:\STR1901 - West bury\IInitial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx «06/18/20» 334 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C A JUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J `L` APPENDIX K WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE WITH PUBLIC SERVICE PROVIDERS P:\STR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean. docx a06/18/20» 335 Le A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA JUNE 2020 This page intentionally left blank P:\STR1901 - West bury\IInitial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx «06/18/20» 336 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C A JUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J `L` APPENDIX L TRIBAL CONSULTATION CORRESPONDENCE P:\STR1901- Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean. docx a06/18/20» 337 Le A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA JUNE 2020 This page intentionally left blank P:\STR1901 - West bury\IInitial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx «06/18/20» 338 RESOLUTION NO. 20-29 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2018-00992, A REQUEST TO AMEND TEXT, TABLES AND FIGURES IN THE DEVELOPMENT CODE TO REFLECT THE CHANGE THE ZONING DESIGNATION OF THE PROJECT SITE FROM COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL (CC) TO MIXED USE (MU) RELATED TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF A MIXED -USE DEVELOPMENT WITH 131 RESIDENTIAL UNITS, 4 COMMERCIAL READY UNITS AND A 1,500-SQUARE FOOT COMMERCIAL SPACE ON 11.44 ACRE PROJECT SITE IN THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL (CC) DISTRICT, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF EAST AVENUE AND NORTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF —APN: 1100-191-04. A. Recitals. 1. SC Westbury Limited Partnership filed an application for the approval of Development Code Amendment DRC2018-00992, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Code Amendment request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 24th day of June 2020, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearings of June 24, 2020, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The 11.44-acre project site is located on the west side of East Avenue, approximately 550 feet north of Foothill Boulevard; and b. The project site made up of 3.76 acres of land unencumbered by easements. Of the remainder of the property, 1.98 acres are within a Southern California Gas Company easement that will be used for parking and 5.7 acres are within a Southern California Edison easement that will be left undeveloped; and C. The vacant project site slopes from north to south and is covered by low vegetation and multiple eucalyptus trees; and d. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: 339 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 20-29 DCA DRC2018-00992 — SC WESTBURY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP June 24, 2020 Page 2 Land Use General Plan Zoning Utility Corridor Open Space (OS) District Site Vacant Community Commercial (CC) District; Foothill Mixed -Use Boulevard Overlay District Subarea 4 North Utility Corridor Utility Corridor Low Medium (LM) Residential District South Vacant Land Mixed -Use Mixed -Use (MU) District East Single -Family Residences City of Fontana City of Fontana Utility Open Space (OS) District West Infrastructure Utility Corridor Commercial Office (CO) District e. Development Code Amendment DRC2018-00992 amends Chapters 17.36 and 17.38 of the Development Code related to the change in zoning of the project site from Community Commercial to Mixed Use. The amendment will modify Development Code Section 17.36.020 (Development standards for mixed -use zoning districts) to eliminate text, figures, and tables related to defining the location and mix of uses within each mixed -use area within the City. On June 15, 2016, the City Council approved General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00887, which similarly eliminated tables in General Plan which described the uses and development ranges permitted within each area designated for Mixed -Use development. The proposed changes will bring the Development Code into alignment with the General Plan and will provide more flexibility in the development of mixed -use zoning areas. The amendment will also modify Development Code Figure 17.38.060-1 (Foothill Boulevard Subareas) and Figure 17.38.060- 15 (Subarea 4 Map) to reflect the proposed zone change; and f. The overall project scope includes Zoning Map Amendment DRC2018-00994, to change the zoning designation from Community Commercial (CC) to Mixed -Use (MU), Design Review DRC2018-00770, for the site plan and architectural design of the proposed 131-unit mixed -use development, Tree Removal Permit DRC2019-00867 to remove 32 onsite trees and Uniform Sign Program DRC2019-00959 for onsite signage. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. This Amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development. The Amendment is related to Zoning Map Amendment DRC2018-00994, which changes the zoning designation of the project site from Community Commercial (CC) to Mixed Use (MU), in conformance with the Mixed Use (MU) General Plan land use designation. The Amendment updates text, tables, figures in the Development Code to reflect the new Zoning Map designation and eliminates any conflicts or inconsistencies between the General Plan and the Development Code; and b. This Amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Development Code. The purpose and intent of the Development Code is to implement the goals and objectives of the General Plan and to guide and manage the future growth of the City. The General Plan land use designation of the project site is Mixed Use (MU). The related Zoning Map Amendment (DRC2018- 340 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 20-29 DCA DRC2018-00992 — SC WESTBURY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP June 24, 2020 Page 3 00994) changes the zoning designation of the project site from Community Commercial (CC) to Mixed Use, in conformance with the Mixed Use (MU) General Plan land use designation. The Amendment updates text, tables, and figures in the Development Code to reflect the related Zoning Map Amendment, thus implementing the goals and objectives of the General Plan; and C. The proposed Amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The project related to the Amendment was reviewed by the Design Review Committee and is of the same high -quality design as the surrounding development and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and d. The subject application is consistent with the objectives of the Development Code. The Development Code is required to be consistent with the land use element of the General Plan. The Amendment modifies text, tables, and figures in the Development Code to reflect the related Zoning Map Amendment (DRC2018-00994), eliminating any conflicts or inconsistencies between the General Plan and the Development Code; and e. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. The General Plan land use designation of the project site is Mixed Use (MU). The related Zoning Map Amendment (DRC2018-00994) amends the zoning designation of the project site from Community Commercial (CC) to Mixed Use (MU) to be in conformance with the General Plan land use designation. The Amendment updates text, tables, and figures in the Development Code to bring the Development Code into conformance with the new General Plan land use designation and Zoning Map designation of the project site. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the application, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in connection with the review and approval of this application based upon the following findings and determinations: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, LSA has prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project, which was peer -reviewed by First Carbon Solutions, a consultant contracted by the City to review this document. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, it was determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. 341 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 20-29 DCA DRC2018-00992 — SC WESTBURY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP June 24, 2020 Page 4 C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission, therefore, recommends that the City Council adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's recommendation is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends City Council approval of the subject Development Code Amendment amending text, tables, and figures as shown on Attachment A and subject to each and every condition set forth in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24th DAY OF JUNE 2020. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA m ATTEST: Tony Guglielmo, Chairman Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary I, Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 24th day of June 2020, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: 342 "Attachment A" 17.36.020 Development standards for mixed use zoning districts. A. Purpose and applicability. The purpose of this section is to establish minimum devel horizontal and/or vertical integration of uses. In the general plan, each mixed use site includes intent statements, land use ranges, and corresponding development assumptions. Development standards in this section apply to all land designated on the zoning map within a Mixed Use District and are intended to be consistent with and implement the aeneral plan. See Fiaure 17.36.020-1 (Mixed Use Sites). D RC2018300992 Land Use Mm Public Res ep+•al+•,I Ceram-merGial A#iGe 21 36% 29-41%a - 512%a 25-35%a 19-1-5%a 39-50% 9-101% 12-1-5%a - A5-9704 - 0 62% 8-100%s - - rl-k�w M�!_._ 4% 7.5% S4e * This table eph• applies +e a is+inn Mixed Use sites 344 Proposed Amendment FIGURE 17.38.060-1 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SUBAREAS t sw # 3K w9ARLA : SUBAREA SUDARPJ►1 �_ � ts� 1ti/Ih`MM •M�/�►, C w Div .� A wr \mow M w/ w��+i prrVwnr�rw{ �V+.�.l�: - z z�Fli� n q-N -meow Py 'Zb - - Q-0, W. �Yr� Modify Figure 17.38.060-1 to change the zoning designation arAPN_ 1100-191-04 from Community Commercial (CC)to Mixed Use (MU) 345 Proposed Amendment FIGURE 17.38.060-15 SUBAREA 4 MAP // F {' ,. fr % WE J i GARC r4 A+ r i I Modify Figure 17.38.060-15 to change the zoning designation ofAW 1100-191-04 from Community Commercial (CC)to Mixed Use (MU) C%td. ar.cwt�+�.o.wti �.r+�w ►� wwa...► �e...w..nr� rya Pu u.Ai.wM■U *WOO 6►%.IPW%Pq Lamwom-OOMMOD&W .r.fn..k.40Ar. Nam. .3wrw%udw it Q =hO",SM Pej r.r....r Ar,Mar 0" �srrar�MI4 .��wrnor.wwwo �►rgawsit� i aIlvwiW rww.rti rrww.w rn C.:fvMrv%DA? 346 RESOLUTION NO. 20-30 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF ZONING MAP AMENDMENT DRC2018-00994, A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE ZONING DESIGNATION OF 11.44 ACRES OF LAND FROM COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL (CC) TO MIXED USE (MU) RELATED TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF A MIXED -USE DEVELOPMENT WITH 131 RESIDENTIAL UNITS, 4 COMMERCIAL READY UNITS AND A 1,500-SQUARE FOOT COMMERCIAL SPACE ON 11.44 ACRE PROJECT SITE IN THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL (CC) DISTRICT, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF EAST AVENUE AND NORTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF — APN: 1100-191-04. A. Recitals. 1. SC Westbury Limited Partnership filed an application for the approval of Zoning Map Amendment DRC2018-00994, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Zoning Map Amendment request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 24th day of June 2020, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearings of June 24, 2020, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The 11.44-acre project site is located on the west side of East Avenue, approximately 550 feet north of Foothill Boulevard; and b. The project site made up of 3.76 acres of land unencumbered by easements. Of the remainder of the property, 1.98 acres are within a Southern California Gas Company easement that will be used for parking and 5.7 acres are within a Southern California Edison easement that will be left undeveloped; and C. The vacant project site slopes from north to south and is covered by low vegetation and multiple eucalyptus trees; and d. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: 347 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 20-30 ZMA DRC2018-00994 — SC WESTBURY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP June 24, 2020 Page 2 Land Use General Plan Zoning Utility Corridor Open Space (OS) District Site Vacant Mixed -Use Community Commercial (CC) District; Foothill Boulevard Overlay District Subarea 4 North Utility Corridor Utility Corridor Low Medium (LM) Residential District South Vacant Land Mixed -Use Mixed -Use (MU) District East Single -Family City of Fontana City of Fontana Residences Utility Open Space (OS) District West Infrastructure Utility Corridor Commercial Office (CO) District e. Zoning Map Amendment DRC2018-00994 changes the zoning designation of the project site from Community Commercial (CC) to Mixed Use (MU). The Zoning Map Amendment will bring the project site into conformance with the General Plan; and f. Zoning Map Amendment DRC2018-00994 necessitates amending the Development Code (DRC2018-00992) to amend text, tables, and figures in the Development Code related to the zone change of the project site from Community Commercial to Mixed Use; and g. The overall project scope includes Development Code Amendment DRC2018-00992, to change text, tables, and figures in the Development Code related to the change in the zoning designation from Community Commercial (CC) to Mixed -Use (MU), Design Review DRC2018-00770, for the site plan and architectural design of the proposed 131-unit mixed -use development, Tree Removal Permit DRC2019-00867 to remove 32 onsite trees and Uniform Sign Program DRC2019-00959 for onsite signage. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area. The subject property is located on a major street and provides adequate vehicle and pedestrian access. The project is compatible with the existing development in the area, including the multi -family develop to the south of the project site; and b. That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties. The Initial Study Part II prepared for the project outlines potential environmental impacts related to the project and identifies project specific mitigation measures that reduce these impacts to less -than -significant; and C. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. The subject Zoning Map Amendment changes the zoning designation of the project site from Community Commercial (CC) to Mixed Use (MU), in conformance with the General Plan Mixed Use (MU) land use designation. 348 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 20-30 ZMA DRC2018-00994 — SC WESTBURY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP June 24, 2020 Page 3 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the application, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in connection with the review and approval of this application based upon the following findings and determinations: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, LSA has prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project, which was peer -reviewed by First Carbon Solutions, a consultant contracted by the City to review this document. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, it was determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission, therefore, recommends that the City Council adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's recommendation is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends City Council approval of the subject Zoning Map Amendment as shown on Attachment A and subject to each and every condition set forth in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. 349 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 20-30 ZMA DRC2018-00994 — SC WESTBURY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP June 24, 2020 Page 4 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF JUNE 2020. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA M Tony Guglielmo, Chairman ATTEST: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary I, Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 24th day of June 2020, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: 350 "Attachment A" - Proposed Zone Change Ei� Law Medium (LM) Park (P) 4� OJect Site Community Commercial (CC) Commercial office (CO) qdUMU) Foothill Boulevard Medium (M) Change the zoning designation of APN- 1100-191-04 from Community Commercial (CC)to Mixed Use (MU) 3 O C D RC2018-009941 RESOLUTION NO. 20-31 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2019-00867, A REQUEST TO REMOVE 32 TREES RELATED TO A PROPOSED MIXED -USE DEVELOPMENT ON 11.44 ACRE PROJECT SITE IN THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL (CC) DISTRICT, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF EAST AVENUE AND NORTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF — APN: 1100-191-04. A. Recitals. 1. SC Westbury Limited Partnership filed an application for the approval of Tree Removal Permit DRC2019-00867, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tree Removal Permit request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 24th day of June 2020, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearings of June 24, 2020, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The 11.44-acre project site is located on the west side of East Avenue, approximately 550 feet north of Foothill Boulevard; and b. The project site made up of 3.76 acres of land unencumbered by easements. Of the remainder of the property, 1.98 acres are within a Southern California Gas Company easement that will be used for parking and 5.7 acres are within a Southern California Edison easement that will be left undeveloped; and C. The vacant project site slopes from north to south and is covered by low vegetation and multiple eucalyptus trees; and d. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: 352 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 20-31 TRP DRC2019-00867 — SC WESTBURY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP June 24, 2020 Page 2 Land Use General Plan Zoning Utility Corridor Open Space (OS) District Site Vacant Mixed -Use Community Commercial (CC) District; Foothill Boulevard Overlay District Subarea 4 North Utility Corridor Utility Corridor Low Medium (LM) Residential District South Vacant Land Mixed -Use Mixed -Use (MU) District East Single -Family City of Fontana City of Fontana Residences Utility Open Space (OS) District West Infrastructure Utility Corridor Commercial Office (CO) District e. The project is for the development of a two and three-story mixed -use development made up of 131 residential units (73 one -bedroom and 58 two -bedroom units), 4 commercial ready units (305 square feet each), that are attached to one -bedroom residential units and a 1,500-square foot commercial space; and f. Tree Removal Permit DRC2019-00867 is for the removal of 32 eucalyptus trees. It has been determined that 32 of 33 on -site eucalyptus trees are in poor condition due to age, pest infestation, lack of care and maintenance, and other observed structural deficiencies (LSA Associates). 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed Tree Removal Permit is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan. The related mixed -use development (Design Review DRC2018-00770) is consistent with the General Plan Mixed Use (MU) land use designation. The removal of the subject trees is necessary to develop the related 131-unit mixed -use development; and b. The proposed Tree Removal Permit will be accord with the objectives of the Municipal Code and the purposes of the district in which permits the removal of heritage trees when associated with the development of the project site. In this case, removal of the trees is necessary to construct a related 131-unit mixed -use development. Additionally, the Arborist Report submitted for the related project (LSA) determined that the on -site eucalyptus trees are in poor condition due to pest infestation, lack of care and maintenance and other observed structural deficiencies and are poor candidates for integration into the project landscape design; and C. The proposed Tree Removal Permit will be compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code including replacement of the removed trees with trees of a species and quantity commensurate with the aesthetic value of the trees to be removed; and d. The proposed Tree Removal Permit, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity as the 31 onsite eucalyptus trees will be replaced with new trees as part of the overall landscape theme. 353 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 20-31 TRP DRC2019-00867 — SC WESTBURY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP June 24, 2020 Page 3 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the application, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in connection with the review and approval of this application based upon the following findings and determinations: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, LSA has prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project, which was peer -reviewed by First Carbon Solutions, a consultant contracted by the City to review this document. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, it was determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission, therefore, recommends that the City Council adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's recommendation is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution 354 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 20-31 TRIP DRC2019-00867 — SC WESTBURY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP June 24, 2020 Page 4 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24th DAY OF JUNE 2020. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA m Tony Guglielmo, Chairman ATTEST: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary I, Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 24th day of June 2020, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: 355 RESOLUTION NO. 20-32 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM DRC2019-00959, A REQUEST TO ESTABLISH A UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM RELATED TO A PROPOSED MIXED -USE DEVELOPMENT ON 11.44 ACRE PROJECT SITE IN THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL (CC) DISTRICT, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF EAST AVENUE AND NORTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF — APN: 1100- 191-04. A. Recitals 1. SC Westbury Limited Partnership filed an application for the approval of Uniform Sign Program DRC2019-00959, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Uniform Sign Program request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 24th day of June 2020, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearings of June 24, 2020, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The 11.44-acre project site is located on the west side of East Avenue, approximately 550 feet north of Foothill Boulevard; and b. The project site made up of 3.76 acres of land unencumbered by easements. Of the remainder of the property, 1.98 acres are within a Southern California Gas Company easement that will be used for parking and 5.7 acres are within a Southern California Edison easement that will be left undeveloped; and C. The vacant project site slopes from north to south and is covered by low vegetation and multiple eucalyptus trees; and d. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: 356 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 20-32 USP DRC2019-00959 — SC WESTBURY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP JUNE 24, 2020 Page 2 Land Use General Plan Zoning Utility Corridor Open Space (OS) District Site Vacant Mixed -Use Community Commercial (CC) District; Foothill Boulevard Overlay District Subarea 4 North Utility Corridor Utility Corridor Low Medium (LM) Residential District South Vacant Land Mixed -Use Mixed -Use (MU) District East Single -Family City of Fontana City of Fontana Residences Utility Open Space (OS) District West Infrastructure Utility Corridor Commercial Office (CO) District e. The project is for the development of a two and three-story mixed -use development made up of 131 residential units (73 one -bedroom and 58 two -bedroom units), 4 commercial ready units (305 square feet each), that are attached to one -bedroom residential units and a 1,500-square foot commercial space; and f. Uniform Sign Program DRC2019-00959 will establish a Uniform Sign Program for the development. The program contains the location and conceptual design of all signs for the residential and commercial components of the project as well as project monumentation. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed uniform sign program is consistent with the development standards for signs as provided in chapter 17.74 (Sign Regulations for Private Property). The proposed signage complies with all related Development Code sign regulation; and b. The design, location, and scale of proposed signs for the integrated development are in keeping with the architectural character of the development. The signs are designed to complement the proposed mixed -use development including size and scale. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the application, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in connection with the review and approval of this application based upon the following findings and determinations: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, LSA has prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project, which was peer -reviewed by First Carbon Solutions, a consultant contracted by the City to review this document. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, it was determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. 357 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 20-32 USP DRC2019-00959 — SC WESTBURY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP JUNE 24, 2020 Page 3 b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission, therefore, recommends that the City Council adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's recommendation is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF June 2020. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA m ATTEST: Tony Guglielmo, Chairman Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary I, Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 24th day of June 2020, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: 358 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 20-32 USP DRC2019-00959 — SC WESTBURY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP JUNE 24, 2020 Page 4 ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: 359 RESOLUTION NO. 20-33 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW DRC2018-00770, A REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW OF A MIXED - USE DEVELOPMENT WITH 131 RESIDENTIAL UNITS, 4 COMMERCIAL READY UNITS AND A 1,500-SQUARE FOOT COMMERCIAL SPACE ON 11.44 ACRE PROJECT SITE IN THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL (CC) DISTRICT, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF EAST AVENUE AND NORTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF — APN: 1100- 191-04. A. Recitals. 1. SC Westbury Limited Partnership filed an application for the approval of Design Review DRC2018-00770, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Design Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 24th day of June 2020, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearings of June 24, 2020, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The 11.44-acre project site is located on the west side of East Avenue, approximately 550 feet north of Foothill Boulevard; and b. The project site made up of 3.76 acres of land unencumbered by easements. Of the remainder of the property, 1.98 acres are within a Southern California Gas Company easement that will be used for parking and 5.7 acres are within a Southern California Edison easement that will be left undeveloped; and C. The vacant project site slopes from north to south and is covered by low vegetation and multiple eucalyptus trees; and d. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: 360 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 20-33 DRC2018-00770 — SC WESTBURY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP June 24, 2020 Page 2 Land Use General Plan Zoning Utility Corridor Open Space (OS) District Site Vacant Mixed -Use Community Commercial (CC) District; Foothill Boulevard Overlay District Subarea 4 North Utility Corridor Utility Corridor Low Medium (LM) Residential District South Vacant Land Mixed -Use Mixed -Use (MU) District East Single -Family City of Fontana City of Fontana Residences Utility Open Space (OS) District West Infrastructure Utility Corridor Commercial Office (CO) District e. The project is for the development of a two and three-story mixed -use development made up of 131 residential units (73 one -bedroom and 58 two -bedroom units), 4 commercial ready units (305 square feet each), that are attached to one -bedroom residential units and a 1,500-square foot commercial space; and f. The residential units will range in size from 676 to 789 square feet for the 1-bedroom units and 1,021 to 1,174 square feet for the 2-bedroom units. Recreational amenities include a pool and spa, BBQ facilities, clubhouse, fitness room, common open space areas, and multiple sports court areas (volleyball, badminton, bocce ball, horseshoes). A larger triangular -shaped common open space is located at the center of the project site and will include communal seating areas with water features and fire pits; and g. The project complies with all requirements of the Development Code including setbacks, building height, open space, recreational amenities, and landscape coverage; and a. The project provides 285 parking spaces, 4 parking spaces above the minimum requirement of 281 parking spaces; and b. The project includes the following related entitlements: Development Code Amendment DRC2018-00992 amends Chapters 17.36 and 17.38 of the Development Code related to the change in zoning of the project site from Community Commercial to Mixed Use. The amendment will modify Development Code Section 17.36.020 (Development standards for mixed -use zoning districts) to eliminate text, figures, and tables related to defining the location and mix of uses within each mixed -use area within the City. On June 15, 2016, the City Council approved General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00887, which similarly eliminated tables in General Plan which described the uses and development ranges permitted within each area designated for Mixed -Use development. The proposed changes will bring the Development Code into alignment with the General Plan and will provide more flexibility in the development of mixed -use zoning areas. The amendment will also modify Development Code Figure 17.38.060-1 (Foothill Boulevard Subareas) and Figure 17.38.060- 15 (Subarea 4 Map) to reflect the proposed zone change. 361 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 20-33 DRC2018-00770 — SC WESTBURY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP June 24, 2020 Page 3 Zoning Map Amendment DRC2018-00994 changes the zoning designation of the project site from Community Commercial (CC) to Mixed Use (MU). The Zoning Map Amendment will bring the project site into conformance with the General Plan. Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20148 is for the subdivision of the 11.44-acre project site to create a one number and one lettered lot tentative tract map for condominium purposes. The numbered lot will include the residential/commercial portion of the project site and the lettered lot will include the existing utility easements (including a portion of the parking lot). Tree Removal Permit DRC2019-00867 is for the removal of 32 eucalyptus trees. It has been determined that all 32 of the 33 on -site eucalyptus trees are in poor condition due to age, pest infestation, lack of care and maintenance, and other observed structural deficiencies (LSA — November 20, 2017). Uniform Sign Program DRC2019-00959 is to establish a Uniform Sign Program for the development. The program contains the location and conceptual design of all signs for the residential and commercial components of the project as well as project monumentation. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan. The General Plan land use designation for the project site is Mixed Use (MU). The General Plan has a stated policy (Policy LU-4.1) to provide new mixed -use development opportunities along the Foothill Boulevard corridor to allow residential, commercial, and civic uses, and to accommodate both transit and automobiles. The proposed mixed -use project is located just north of Foothill Boulevard and is within walking distance of a transit stop; and b. The proposed use is in accord with the objective of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. The project will be consistent with the Development Code with approval of the related Zoning Map Amendment (DRC2018-00994), which changes the zoning designation from Community Commercial (CC) to Mixed Use (MU), in conformance with the General Plan land use designation; and C. The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. The project will be in compliance with the Development Code with approval of the related Development Code Amendment DRC2018-00992, which amends text, tables and figure to reflect the changing of the zoning of the project site from Community Commercial to Mixed Use; and d. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The Initial Study Part II outlines potential environmental impacts related to the project and identifies project -specific mitigation measures that reduce these impacts to less -than -significant. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the application, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in connection with the review and approval of this application based upon the following findings and determinations: 362 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 20-33 DRC2018-00770 — SC WESTBURY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP June 24, 2020 Page 4 a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, LSA has prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project, which was peer -reviewed by First Carbon Solutions, a consultant contracted by the City to review this document. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, it was determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission, therefore, recommends that the City Council adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's recommendation is based are the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF JUNE 2020. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA M. Tony Guglielmo, Chairman ATTEST: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary 363 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 20-33 DRC2018-00770 — SC WESTBURY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP June 24, 2020 Page 5 I, Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 24th day of June 2020, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: 364 RESOLUTION NO. 20-34 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT20148, A REQUEST TO SUBDIVIDE 11.41 ACRES OF LAND FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES RELATED TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 131 RESIDENTIAL UNITS, 4 COMMERCIAL READY UNITS AND A 1,500-SQUARE FOOT COMMERCIAL SPACE ON A 11.44 ACRE PROJECT SITE IN THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL (CC) DISTRICT, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF EAST AVENUE AND NORTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF — APN: 1100-191-04. A. Recitals. 1. SC Westbury Limited Partnership filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20148, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 24th day of June 2020, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing of June 24, 2020, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The 11.44-acre project site is located on the west side of East Avenue, approximately 550 feet north of Foothill Boulevard; and b. The project site made up of 3.76 acres of land unencumbered by easements. Of the remainder of the property, 1.98 acres are within a Southern California Gas Company easement that will be used for parking and 5.7 acres are within a Southern California Edison easement that will be left undeveloped; and C. The vacant project site slopes from north to south and is covered by low vegetation and multiple eucalyptus trees; and d. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: 365 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 20-34 SUBTT20148 — SC WESTBURY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP June 24, 2020 Page 2 Land Use General Plan Zoning Utility Corridor Open Space (OS) District Site Vacant Mixed -Use Community Commercial (CC) District; Foothill Boulevard Overlay District Subarea 4 North Utility Corridor Utility Corridor Low Medium (LM) Residential District South Vacant Land Mixed -Use Mixed -Use (MU) District East Single -Family City of Fontana City of Fontana Residences Utility Open Space (OS) District West Infrastructure Utility Corridor Commercial Office (CO) District e. The subdivision of the 11.44-acre project site is being requested to create a one number and one lettered lot tentative tract map for condominium purposes. The numbered lot will include the residential/commercial portion of the project site and the lettered lot will include the existing utility easements (including a portion of the parking lot); and f. The overall project scope includes Development Code Amendment DRC2018-00992, to amend text, tables, and figures related to the change in the zoning designation of the project site, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2018-00994, to change the zoning designation from Community Commercial (CC) to Mixed -Use (MU), Tree Removal Permit DRC2019-00867 to remove 32 onsite trees and Uniform Sign Program DRC2019-00959 for onsite signage. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans. The proposed tentative tract map is consistent with the General Plan Mixed Use (MU) land use designation. The tentative tract map will be consistent with the Development Code with the approval of the related Zoning Map Amendment (DRC2018-00994), changing the zoning designation from Community Commercial (CC) to Mixed Use (MU), consistent with the General Plan land use designation; and b. The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans. The proposed tentative tract map is consistent with the General Plan land use designation. The tentative tract map will be consistent with the Development Code with approval of the related Zoning Map Amendment (DRC2018-00994), which changes the zoning designation from Community Commercial (CC) to Mixed Use (MU), in conformance with the General Plan land use designation; and C. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed. The project site is located at the intersection of two major streets and is within walking distance of a transit stop on Foothill Boulevard. The site is well suited for a mixed -use development including providing adequate access for vehicles, bicycles, and pedestrians; and 366 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 20-34 SUBTT20148 — SC WESTBURY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP June 24, 2020 Page 3 d. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat. The Initial Study Part II outlines potential environmental impacts related to the project and identifies project -specific mitigation measures that reduce these impacts to less -than -significant; and e. The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems. The Initial Study Part II outlines potential environmental impacts related to the project and identifies project -specific mitigation measures that reduce these impacts to less -than -significant; and f. The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. The project does include parking located on a Southern California Gas Company easement, for which the applicant has received an initial acceptance letter to allow parking within the easement area. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the application, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in connection with the review and approval of this application based upon the following findings and determinations: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, LSA has prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project, which was peer -reviewed by First Carbon Solutions, a consultant contracted by the City to review this document. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, it was determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission, therefore, recommends that the City Council adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's recommendation is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 367 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 20-34 SUBTT20148 — SC WESTBURY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP June 24, 2020 Page 4 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF JUNE 2020. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA go Tony Guglielmo, Chairman ATTEST: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary I, Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 24th day of June 2020, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: 368 Conditions of Approval Community Development Department Project #: DRC2018-00770 DRC2018-00992, DRC2018-00994, DRC2019-00959 & SUBTT20148 Project Name: EDR - Westbury Location: -- - 110019104-0000 Project Type: Design Review Development Code Amendment, Uniform Sign Program, Zoning Map Amendment & Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. The project shall comply with all mitigation measures outlined in the Mitigation Monitoring Plan. 2. Prior to approval of building permits, the project shall submit building plans showing the proposed design of the screening of the CVWD pumping station on the adjacent parcel. The design shall be certified by an acoustic engineer that it will mitigate the outdoor noise levels to be in compliance with the Rancho Cucamonga municipal code for residential structures. The design and construction of the barrier will need to be coordinated and approved by CVWD. The construction of the enclosure will need to be installed prior to final approval of the last phase of the project. The applicant should work with the property owner of the approved development to the south to coordinate the construction of the enclosure and the division of the cost. Standard Conditions of Approval 3. The applicant shall sign the Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval provided by the Planning Department. The signed Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval shall be returned to the Planning Department prior to the submittal of grading/construction plans for plan check, request for a business license, and/or commencement of the approved activity. 4. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 5. Approval of Tentative Tract No. 20148 is granted subject to the approval of Zoning Map Amendment DRC2018-00994, Development Code Amendment DRC2018-00992 and Design Review DRC2018-00770. 6. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval or Approval Letter, Conditions of Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 7. Crime Free Multi -Family Housing Program - The owner shall cause the manager and any resident manager to complete the training for and enroll the project in the San Bernardino County Crime Free Multi -Family Housing Program. www.CityofRC.us Printed: 6/8/2020 369 Project #: DRC2018-00770 DRC2018-00992, DRC2018-00994, DRC2019-00959 Project Name: EDR - Westbury Location: -- - 110019104-0000 Project Type: Design Review Development Code Amendment, Uniform Sign Program, Zoning Map Amendment ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 8. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption and Mitigated Negative Declaration fee in the amount of $2,456.75. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing. 9. This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the Engineering Services Department within 3 years from the date of the approval. 10. All dwellings shall have the front, side and rear elevations upgraded with architectural treatment, detailing and increased delineation of surface treatment subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. 11. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions shall restrict the storage of recreational vehicles on this site unless they are the principal source of transportation for the owner and prohibit parking on interior circulation aisles other than in designated visitor parking areas. 12. All units shall be provided with garage door openers if driveways are less than 18 feet in depth from back of sidewalk. 13. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet. 14. Multiple car garage driveways shall be tapered down to a standard two -car width at street. 15. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 17 feet long with a required 1-foot overhang (e.g., over a curb stop). 16. Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the Planning Director, City Engineer, and Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. For residential development, private gated entrances shall provide adequate turn -around space in front of the gate and a separate visitor lane with call box to avoid cars stacking into the public right-of-way. 17. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. 18. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/plazas/ recreational uses. 19. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination and in conformance with Building and Safety Services Department standards, the Municipal Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department (RCFD) Standards. 20. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Services Department and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer. The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning Department a list of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes. www.CityofRC.us Printed: 6/8/2020 370 Page 2 of 21 Project #: DRC2018-00770 DRC2018-00992, DRC2018-00994, DRC2019-00959 Project Name: EDR - Westbury Location: -- - 110019104-0000 Project Type: Design Review Development Code Amendment, Uniform Sign Program, Zoning Map Amendment ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 21. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all lots for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department approval; including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing. 22. All Double Detector Checks (DDC) and Fire Department Connections (FDC) required and/or proposed shall be installed at locations that are not within direct view or line -of -sight of the main entrance. The specific locations of each DDC and FDC shall require the review and approval of the Planning Department and Fire Construction Services/Fire Department. All Double Detector Checks (DDC) and Fire Department Connections (FDC) shall be screened behind a 4-foot high block wall. These walls shall be constructed of similar material used on -site to match the building. 23. For multiple -family development, provide exterior lockable storage space as required by the California Green Building Code. 24. All ground -mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 25. A uniform hardscape and street furniture design including seating benches, trash receptacles, free-standing potted plants, bike racks, light bollards, etc., shall be utilized and be compatible with the architectural style. Detailed designs shall be submitted for Planning Department review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 26.On corner side yards, provide minimum 5-foot setback between walls/fences and sidewalk. The 5-foot wall/fence setback and the parkway shall have landscape and irrigation in addition to the required street trees. Detailed landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. The parkway landscaping including trees, shrubs, ground covers and irrigation shall be maintained by the property owner. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the parkway maintenance requirement, in a standard format as determined by the Planning Director, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 27. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 28. For multiple -family development, laundry facilities shall be provided as required by the Development Code. 29. A detailed on -site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director and Police Department (909-477-2800) prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. www.CityofRC.us Printed: 6/8/2020 371 Page 3 of 21 Project #: DRC2018-00770 DRC2018-00992, DRC2018-00994, DRC2019-00959 Project Name: EDR - Westbury Location: -- - 110019104-0000 Project Type: Design Review Development Code Amendment, Uniform Sign Program, Zoning Map Amendment ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 30. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double wall condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owners at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/fences along the project perimeter. 31. Revised Site Plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 32. Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, and the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 33. If no centralized trash receptacles are provided, all trash pick-up shall be for individual units with all receptacles shielded from public view. 34. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval. Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to installation of any signs. 35. Unless exempt, directory monument sign(s) shall be provided for apartment, condominium, or town homes prior to occupancy and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Department and the RCFPD prior to issuance of Building Permits for the signs in question. (Chapter 17.74.040 B-4) 36. A Uniform Sign Program for this development shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. 37. For multi -family residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on -site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way. All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage. 38. Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in accordance with the Development Code Section 17.80.050, and so noted on the grading plans. The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans. The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting, and trimming methods. 39. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits for the development or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. For development occurring in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, the landscape plans will also be reviewed by Fire Construction Services. 40. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. www.CityofRC.us Printed: 6/8/2020 372 Page 4 of 21 Project #: DRC2018-00770 DRC2018-00992, DRC2018-00994, DRC2019-00959 Project Name: EDR - Westbury Location: -- - 110019104-0000 Project Type: Design Review Development Code Amendment, Uniform Sign Program, Zoning Map Amendment ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 41. Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. These criteria shall encourage the natural growth characteristics of the selected tree species. 42. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of building. 43. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 44. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or projections shall be screened from all sides and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Department. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. Any roof -mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically more than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet, shall be screened by an architecturally designed enclosure which exhibits a permanent nature with the building design and is detailed consistent with the building. Any roof -mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically less than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet shall be painted consistent with the color scheme of the building. Details shall be included in building plans. Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Streetlights: Install approximately 6 new City owned (LS-2) streetlights along the project boundary frontage on East Ave, approximately every 150' staggered with the existing streetlights on the eastside of East Ave. Coordinate with SCE Planning to place a meterless pedestal as the Point of Demarcation for service connection in the ROW. 2. Fiber: The proposed development is slated to be included in the City's Fiber Optic Master Plan that would provide a City owned Fiber -to -the -Premise (FTTP) infrastructure. The City will require 1-4" UG Fiber Optic conduit on the west side of East Ave along the project boundary. The end runs will require a 3'x4'x3' pullbox on each end. The size, placement and location of the conduit and vaults shall be shown on the Street Improvement and/or Public Improvement Plans and subject to the Engineering Services Department's review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or final map approval, whichever comes first. On site, the City will require 14" UG HDPE or equal fiber optic within a duct and structure system to be installed joint trench Drawing 135-137. The size, placement and location of the conduit the final dry utility onsite substructure plans and subject to the review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits comes first. conduit to be placed underground by the Developer per Standard and/or vaults shall be shown on Engineering Services Department's :)r final map approval, whichever www.CityofRC.us Printed: 6/8/2020 373 Page 5 of 21 Project #: DRC2018-00770 DRC2018-00992, DRC2018-00994, DRC2019-00959 Project Name: EDR - Westbury Location: -- - 110019104-0000 Project Type: Design Review Development Code Amendment, Uniform Sign Program, Zoning Map Amendment ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 3. The street lights shall be owned by the City. Developer shall be responsible to coordinate and pay all costs of street lights and to provide power to City owned street lights. 4. Prior to the approval of the improvement plans the north driveway shall align with existing intersection of Marshall Court on the east side of East Avenue. 5. The distances between the driveways shall be per City Policy. 6. The typical section for East Avenue shall be: 8' S/W 1 8' Parking 1 3' Door Buffer 1 5' Bike Lane Striped Median Or, as directed by the City Engineer. 4' Bike Lane Buffer 1 15' Vehicle Lane 1 11' Standard Conditions of Approval 7. Dedication shall be made of the following rights -of -way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline): 44 total feet on East Avenue along Lot A 44 total feet on East Avenue with a 4-foot sidewalk easement along Lot 1 To the satisfaction of the City Engineer 8. Easements for public sidewalks placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City. 9. Rights -of -way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets, community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, traffic signal encroachment and maintenance, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. Private easements for non-public facilities (cross -lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc.) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. 10. Vehicular access rights shall be dedicated to the City for the following streets, except for approved openings: East Avenue. 11. All required public landscaping and irrigation systems shall be continuously maintained by the developer until accepted by the City. 12. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts (LMD 9, SLD 1, SLD 8, and CFD 85-1) shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 13. Public landscape areas are required to incorporate substantial areas (50 percent) of mortared cobble or other acceptable non -irrigated surfaces. 14. A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department for review and approval prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. www.CityofRC.us Printed: 6/8/2020 374 Page 6 of 21 Project #: DRC2018-00770 DRC2018-00992, DRC2018-00994, DRC2019-00959 Project Name: EDR - Westbury Location: -- - 110019104-0000 Project Type: Design Review Development Code Amendment, Uniform Sign Program, Zoning Map Amendment ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 15. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. 16. Add the following note to any private landscape plans that show street trees: "All improvements within the public right-of-way, including street trees, shall be installed per the public improvement plans." If there is a discrepancy between the public and private plans, the street improvement plans will govern. www.CityofRC.us Printed: 6/8/2020 375 Page 7 of 21 Project #: DRC2018-00770 DRC2018-00992, DRC2018-00994, DRC2019-00959 Project Name: EDR - Westbury Location: -- - 110019104-0000 Project Type: Design Review Development Code Amendment, Uniform Sign Program, Zoning Map Amendment ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 17. Construct the following perimeter street improvements (to the satisfaction of the City Engineer) including, but not limited to: Street Name: East Avenue (Entire Frontage) Curb & Gutter A.C. Pvmt Side -walk Drive Appr. Street Lights Street Trees Geijera parviflora (Australian Willow) 45' o/c. Comm Trail Bike Trail Other Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114. (d) If so marked, an in -lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item. 1. East Avenue frontage improvements to be in accordance with Etiwanda Specific Plan "Secondary Arterial" (Mid -Block) standards as required and including: A. Dedicate right of way and provide curb & gutter 32' Mid Block and 44' at intersection from centerline, sidewalk, LED streetlights, and traffic striping & signage as required. B. Street lights shall be owned by the City. Developer shall be responsible to coordinate and pay all costs to provide SCE power on City owned street lights. Coordinate with City staff for design and installation requirements. C. Drive approach shall be in accordance with the City Driveway Policy including minimum distance to the intersection. 2. All improvements including the access ramps shall be in accordance with the latest ADA standards a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. www.CityofRC.us Printed: 6/8/2020 376 Page 8 of 21 Project #: DRC2018-00770 DRC2018-00992, DRC2018-00994, DRC2019-00959 Project Name: EDR - Westbury Location: -- - 110019104-0000 Project Type: Design Review Development Code Amendment, Uniform Sign Program, Zoning Map Amendment ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. 18. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. 19. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. 20.Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. 21. All public improvements on the following streets shall be operationally complete prior to the issuance of Building Permits: East Avenue 22. All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. 23. ** CD Information Required Prior to Sign -Off for Building Permit Prior to the issuance of building permits, if valuation is greater or equal to $100,000, a Diversion Deposit and a related administrative fee shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 65% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Applicant must identify if they are self -hauling or utilizing Burrtec prior to issuance of a building permit. Proof of diversion must be submitted to the Environmental Engineering Division within 60 days following the completion of the construction and / or demolition project. Contact Marissa Ostos, Environmental Engineering, at (909) 774-4062 for more information. Instructions and forms are available at the City's website, www.cityofrc.us, under City Hall / Engineering / Environmental Programs / Construction & Demolition Diversion Program. www.CityofRC.us Printed: 6/8/2020 377 Page 9 of 21 Project #: DRC2018-00770 DRC2018-00992, DRC2018-00994, DRC2019-00959 Project Name: EDR - Westbury Location: -- - 110019104-0000 Project Type: Design Review Development Code Amendment, Uniform Sign Program, Zoning Map Amendment ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 24. Prior to approval of the final map, a deposit shall be posted with the City covering the estimated cost of apportioning the assessments under Assessment Districts LMD 9, SLD 1, SLD 9 and CFD 85-1 among the newly created parcels. 25. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to Building Permit issuance if no map is involved. 26. Permits shall be obtained from the following agencies for work within their right of way: Southern California Edison and the Southern California Gas Company. 27. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 28. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. Including, but not limited to, Southern California Edison and Southern California Gas Company. 29. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. www.CityofRC.us Printed: 6/8/2020 378 Page 10 of 21 Project #: DRC2018-00770 DRC2018-00992, DRC2018-00994, DRC2019-00959 Project Name: EDR - Westbury Location: -- - 110019104-0000 Project Type: Design Review Development Code Amendment, Uniform Sign Program, Zoning Map Amendment ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 30. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Street Name: East Avenue Botanical Name: Geijera parviflora Common Name: Australian Willow Min. Grow Space Spacing: 45-feet Size: 15-gallon minimum Qty.: to be determined during design Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Fire Alarm and Monitoring Systems - General Required fire alarm systems and fire sprinkler monitoring systems are required to be in accordance with Fire District Standard 9-3. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section. 2. Temporary Fire Access and Hydrants Temporary fire apparatus access (fire lanes) and temporary fire hydrants, if needed, are required to be in accordance with Fire District Standard 33-2. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section. 3. Storm Water Retention Fire apparatus access roads (fire lanes) can be included in an engineered onsite storm water retention plan. The ponding of storm water shall not exceed a designed depth of four (4) inches in the designated fire apparatus access road (s) and the area between the fire apparatus access road(s) and the exterior walls of all normally occupied buildings. www.CityofRC.us Printed: 6/8/2020 379 Page 11 of 21 Project #: DRC2018-00770 DRC2018-00992, DRC2018-00994, DRC2019-00959 Project Name: EDR - Westbury Location: -- - 110019104-0000 Project Type: Design Review Development Code Amendment, Uniform Sign Program, Zoning Map Amendment ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit Standard Conditions of Approval 4. Roof Access Roof access is required to be in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-6. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section. If landscaping plans will be submitted, ensure that the landscaping is coordinated with the roof access and required ladder points. 5. Emergency Responder Radio Coverage The location, size, construction materials, or other features of this building and the associated project are such that adequate emergency responder radio coverage may not be achievable within the building that is proposed. It is highly recommended that a radio signal strength assessment is completed by San Bernardino Information Services Department (ISD). Please contact Tim Trager with County ISD at 909-388-5563 or ttrager@isd.sbcounty.gov Upon substantial completion and final completion of construction, the fire code official will oversee a radio signal strength test that is in accordance with the California Fire Code. If acceptable radio coverage cannot be achieved after construction is completed, equipment necessary to increase the radio signal strength or otherwise allow adequate emergency responder radio communication will be required to be installed. 6. Commercial Building Signage Street address and unit/suite signage for commercial and industrial buildings are required to be in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-8. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section. www.CityofRC.us Printed: 6/8/2020 380 Page 12 of 21 Project #: DRC2018-00770 DRC2018-00992, DRC2018-00994, DRC2019-00959 Project Name: EDR - Westbury Location: -- - 110019104-0000 Project Type: Design Review Development Code Amendment, Uniform Sign Program, Zoning Map Amendment ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit Standard Conditions of Approval 7. Water Supply Public and private fire service water mains, public and private hydrants, water control valves, fire sprinkler risers, fire department connections (FDCs), and other fire protection water related devices and equipment are required to be provided, designed, and installed in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-10. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section. A master fire department connection (FDC) will be installed at the street or on the DCDA and be located 15-50 from a public hydrant. A separate FDC for each building is not required. Sprinkler riser laterals will have a post indicator valve (PIV) installed or have a control valve installed on the riser. All sprinkler risers will be equipped with a check valve. The public water plans are submitted as a separate plan submittal. These plans do not need to include the private, onsite water lines or fire protection laterals. The private, onsite water plans are submitted as a separate plan submittal. These plans need to show the public infrastructure and indicate that the public water plans are submitted separately. Fire water infrastructure must be shown consistently in the public water plans, private water plans, and onsite sewer and water plans. 8. Fire Service Site Plan A fire service site plan is required in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-11. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section. 9. Fire Sprinklers Fire sprinkler systems are required to be installed in accordance with Fire District Standard 9-5. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section. 10. Fire Flow Fire flow is required to be in accordance with Appendix B of the California Fire Code. The Fire District has adopted the appendix without local amendments. Proof of the availability of the required fire flow must be provided to the Fire District. Fire flow information is obtained from the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD). CVWD can be reached at 909-944-6000 or custserv@cvwdwater.com. Proof of available fire flow is required to be in the form of a letter from CVWD that is dated within the past 12 months. 11. Knox Box Knox Box(es) is/are required in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-9. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section. If an installed Knox Box is available to this business, keys for the suite/unit are required to be provided to the Fire Inspector at the final inspection. www.CityofRC.us Printed: 6/8/2020 381 Page 13 of 21 Project #: DRC2018-00770 DRC2018-00992, DRC2018-00994, DRC2019-00959 Project Name: EDR - Westbury Location: -- - 110019104-0000 Project Type: Design Review Development Code Amendment, Uniform Sign Program, Zoning Map Amendment ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit Standard Conditions of Approval 12. Project Security — Required Due to the type of construction, construction materials, the floor area of the project, and known risks associated with projects of this nature, a Fire Protection and Site Safety plan is required to be implemented when combustible construction materials are delivered to the site, with the exception of foundation form materials. The Fire Prevention and Site Safety plan is required to be in compliance with Fire District Standard 33-3. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section. Review and approval of the fire prevention and site safety plan is a condition of construction permit approval. The fire prevention and site safety plan is required to be approved by the Fire District prior to construction permits being approved and issued. Building and Safety Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. When the Entitlement Review is approved submit complete construction drawings including structural calculations, energy calculations and soils report to Building and Safety for plan review in accordance with the current edition of the CA Building and Fire Codes including all local ordinances and standards which are effective at the time of Plan Check Submittal. The new structures are required to be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers per the CBC and Current RCFPD Ordinance. Disabled access for the site and building must be in accordance to the State of CA and ADA regulations. If it is anticipated that there will be a need for temporary fire protection water supply and/or temporary fire access, submit a separate plan for review and approval that complies with RCFD Standard 33-3. The developer and architect are responsible for reproducing all the applicable fire standards on the plans and designing the project to meet all applicable regulations of the adopted standards at the time of plan check submittal. The Fire Standards and Guidance Documents are available on the City's web site www.cityofrc.us follow the path from the home page to city hall/fire district/prevention/fire code standards. Coordinate the locations trees found in the landscape plans with the required roof access ladder points required on the buildings per Standard 5-6. Annexation of this parcel to the CFD is required and must be completed before Building permits are issued. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout "Information for Grading Plans and Permit". 2. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code and/or the California Residential Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 3. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. www.CityofRC.us Printed: 6/8/2020 382 Page 14 of 21 Project #: DRC2018-00770 DRC2018-00992, DRC2018-00994, DRC2019-00959 Project Name: EDR - Westbury Location: -- - 110019104-0000 Project Type: Design Review Development Code Amendment, Uniform Sign Program, Zoning Map Amendment ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 4. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the City Engineer, or his designee, prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit. 6. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. All dust control sign (s) shall be located outside of the public right of way. 7. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Engineering Services Department for review, the rough grading plan shall be a separate plan submittal and permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 8. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall(s) on property line(s) or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. 9. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Grading and Drainage Plan shall show the accessibility path from the public right of way and the accessibility parking stalls to the building doors in conformance with the current adopted California Building Code. All accessibility ramps shall show sufficient detail including gradients, elevations, and dimensions and comply with the current adopted California Building Code. 10. A permit shall be obtained from The Gas Company for any work within their right-of-way/easement, including grading prior to issuance of a grading permit. 11. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall obtain written comments from The Gas Company regarding site design restrictions within their easement and provide a copy of said comments to the City Engineer for review. 12. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the grading plan shall show that all manufactured slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way, permitted line, or the adjacent private property. All slope offsets shall meet the requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 13. Prior to the issuance of a grading plan for multi -family projects, the private streets and drive aisles within multi -family developments shall include street plans as part of the Grading and Drainage Plan set. The private street plan view shall show typical street sections. The private street profile view shall show the private street/drive aisle centerline. 14. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the grading and drainage plan shall show the maximum parking stall gradient at 7 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current adopted California Building Code. 15. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the City Engineer, or his designee. www.CityofRC.us Printed: 6/8/2020 383 Page 15 of 21 Project #: DRC2018-00770 DRC2018-00992, DRC2018-00994, DRC2019-00959 Project Name: EDR - Westbury Location: -- - 110019104-0000 Project Type: Design Review Development Code Amendment, Uniform Sign Program, Zoning Map Amendment ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 16. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond project boundary. 17. This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 18. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy or final sign off by the Building Inspector the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) storm water treatment devices and best management practices (BMP). 19. Prior to approval of the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), the WQMP shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 20. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment devices and best management practices (BMP) as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan, shall be provided for by CC&R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the approval of the Water Quality Management Plan. Said CC&R's and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. 21. The final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP) shall include executed maintenance agreements along with the maintenance guidelines for all proprietary structural storm water treatment devices (BMP's). In the event the applicant cannot get the proprietary device maintenance agreements executed prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant is required to submit a letter to be included within the WQMP document, and scanned and pasted onto the Site and Drainage Plan which states that prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy with applicant shall enter into a contract for the maintenance of the proprietary storm water treatment device. If the proprietary storm water treatment device is part of a residential subdivision, prior to the sale of the residential lot, the developer shall include maintenance agreement(s) as part of the sale of the residential lot to the buyer. A copy of the maintenance agreements to be included in the sale of the property shall be included within the WQMP document. 22. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and approval of the project specific water quality management plan all private storm water catch basin inlets shall include insert filters to capture those pollutants of concern as addressed in the in the final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP). At a minimum catch basin insert filters to capture trash and other floating debris. All catch basin insert filters shall be maintained on a regular basis as described in the "Inspection and Maintenance Responsibility for Post Construction BMP" section of the final project -specific water quality management plan. 23. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Project -Specific Water Quality Management Plan shall include a completed copy of "Worksheet H: Factor of Safety and Design Infiltration Worksheet" located in Appendix D "Section VII — Infiltration Rate Evaluation Protocol and Factor of Safety Recommendations, ..." of the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans. The infiltration study shall include the Soil Engineer's recommendations for Appendix D, Table VII.3: Suitability Assessment Related Considerations for Infiltration Facility Safety Factors". www.CityofRC.us Printed: 6/8/2020 384 Page 16 of 21 Project #: DRC2018-00770 DRC2018-00992, DRC2018-00994, DRC2019-00959 Project Name: EDR - Westbury Location: -- - 110019104-0000 Project Type: Design Review Development Code Amendment, Uniform Sign Program, Zoning Map Amendment ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 24. Prior to approval of the final project -specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project -specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans". 25. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre -grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre -grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over -excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 26. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Engineer and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 27. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID). The WDID number shall also be shown on the WQMP Site and Drainage Plan document. 28. The applicant shall provide a copy of a completed EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) for each underground infiltration device, with the Facility ID Number assigned, to the Building and Safety Services Department Official prior to issuance of the Grading Permit and/or approval of the project -specific Water Quality Management Plan. A copy of EPA Form 7520-16 shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set, and a copy of said form shall be included in the project -specific Water Quality Management Plan. 29. The land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis for the Class V Injection Wells/underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best management practices (BMP"s) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. www.CityofRC.us Printed: 6/8/2020 385 Page 17 of 21 Project #: DRC2018-00770 DRC2018-00992, DRC2018-00994, DRC2019-00959 Project Name: EDR - Westbury Location: -- - 110019104-0000 Project Type: Design Review Development Code Amendment, Uniform Sign Program, Zoning Map Amendment ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 30. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy by the Building Official, or his designee, the civil engineer of record shall file a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Post Construction Storm Water Treatment Devices As -Built Certificate with the Environmental Programs Coordinator, City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Services Department. 31. As the use of drywells are proposed for the structural storm water treatment device, to meet the infiltration requirements of the current Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Systems (MS4) Permit, adequate source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration shall be evaluated prior to infiltration and discussed in the final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan document. www.CityofRC.us Printed: 6/8/2020 386 Page 18 of 21 Project #: DRC2018-00770 DRC2018-00992, DRC2018-00994, DRC2019-00959 Project Name: EDR - Westbury Location: -- - 110019104-0000 Project Type: Design Review Development Code Amendment, Uniform Sign Program, Zoning Map Amendment ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 32. GROUND WATER PROTECTION: Prior to approval of the final project specific water quality management plan (WQMP), the WQMP document shall meet the requirements of the State Water Resources Control Board Order No. R8-2010-0036 (NPDES No. CAS 618036), the San Bernardino County Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Separation (MS4) Permit reads: Section XI.D(Water Quality Management Plan Requirements).8(Groundwater Protection): Treatment Control BMPs utilizing infiltration [exclusive of incidental infiltration and BMPs not designed to primarily function as infiltration devices (such as grassy swales, detention basins, vegetated buffer strips, constructed wetlands, etc.)] must comply with the following minimum requirements to protect groundwater: a. Use of structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause or contribute to an exceedance of ground water quality objectives. b. Source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration should be evaluated prior to infiltration. c. Adequate pretreatment of runoff prior to infiltration shall be required in gas stations and large commercial parking lots. (NOTE: The State Water Quality Control Board defines a large commercial parking lot as `100,000 sq. ft. or more of commercial development to include parking lot (with 100 or more vehicle traffics), OR, by means of 5,000sgft or more of allowable space designated for parking purposes'). d. Unless adequate pre-treatment of runoff is provided prior to infiltration structural infiltration treatment BMPs must not be used for areas of industrial or light industrial activity{77), areas subject to high vehicular traffic (25,000 or more daily traffic); car washes; fleet storage areas; nurseries; or any other high threat to water quality land uses or activities. e. Class V injection wells or dry wells must not be placed in areas subject to vehicular{78} repair or maintenance activities{79}, such as an auto body repair shop, automotive repair shop, new and used car dealership, specialty repair shop (e.g., transmission and muffler repair shop) or any facility that does any vehicular repair work. f. Structural infiltration BMP treatment shall not be used at sites that are known to have soil and groundwater contamination. g. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall be located at least 100 feet horizontally from any water supply wells. h. The vertical distance from the bottom of any infiltration structural treatment BMP to the historic high groundwater mark shall be at least 10-feet. Where the groundwater basins do not support beneficial uses, this vertical distance criteria may be reduced, provided groundwater quality is maintained. i. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause a nuisance or pollution as defined in Water Code Section 13050. www.CityofRC.us Printed: 6/8/2020 387 Page 19 of 21 Project #: DRC2018-00770 DRC2018-00992, DRC2018-00994, DRC2019-00959 Project Name: EDR - Westbury Location: -- - 110019104-0000 Project Type: Design Review Development Code Amendment, Uniform Sign Program, Zoning Map Amendment ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 33. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on -site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on -site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. The report shall contain water surface profile gradient calculations for all storm drain pipes 12-inches and larger in diameter. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. In addition, the project specific drainage study shall provide inlet calculations showing the proper sizing of the water quality management plan storm water flows into the proposed structural storm water treatment devices. 34.It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off -site drainage easements prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 35. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the latest adopted California Plumbing Code. Private storm drain improvements shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan. 36. Southern California Edison (SCE) shall approve all plans that impact their easement, including utilities, storm drain, slopes, and street trees and landscaping prior to issuance of a grading permit. A note shall be included on all pertinent plans requiring SCE to be notified two working days prior to starting any work in the vicinity of their easement. 37. The Gas Company shall approve all plans that impact their easement, including utilities, storm drain, slopes, and street trees and landscaping prior to issuance of a grading permit. A note shall be included on all pertinent plans requiring The Gas Company to be notified two working days prior to starting any work in the vicinity of their easement. 38. A permit shall be obtained from Southern California Edison (SCE) for any work within their right-of-way/easement, including grading prior to issuance of a grading permit. 39. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall obtain written comments from SCE regarding site design restrictions within their easement and provide a copy of said comments to the City Engineer for review. 40. The land/property owner shall follow the inspection and maintenance requirements of the approved project specific Water Quality Management Plan and shall provide a copy of the inspection reports on a biennial basis to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. 41. A final project -specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be approved by the City Engineer, or his designee, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit or any building permit. 42. The Site and Drainage Plan in the final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan shall show the locations of all roof downspout drains. if required for storm water quality purposes, the downspouts shall include filters. 43. Prior to issuance of a grading permit for residential projects the applicant shall show on the electrical plans and the permitted grading plan set the location for a future installation of an Electric Vehicle (EV) charging station/parking area per the current adopted California Green Building Standards Code, section 4.106.4. www.CityofRC.us Printed: 6/8/2020 388 Page 20 of 21 Project #: DRC2018-00770 DRC2018-00992, DRC2018-00994, DRC2019-00959 Project Name: EDR - Westbury Location: -- - 110019104-0000 Project Type: Design Review Development Code Amendment, Uniform Sign Program, Zoning Map Amendment ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 44. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on -site construction where possible, and shall provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 45. All roof drainage flowing to the public right of way (East Avenue) must drain under the sidewalk through a parkway culvert approved by the Engineering Department. This shall be shown on both the grading and drainage plan and Engineering Services Department required plans. 46. Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, the permitted grading plan (or architectural site plan) set shall show in each of the typical sections and the plan view show how the separations between the building exterior and exterior ground surface meet the requirements of Sections CBC1804.3/CRC R401.3, CBC2304.11.2.2/CRC R317.1(2) and CBC2512.1.2/CRC R703.6.2.1 of the current adopted California Building Code/Residential Code. 47. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall obtain a signed and notarized letter from the adjacent property owner(s) for ALL work proposed on the adjacent property. The letter shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set. The letter shall show on either the title sheet or a detail sheet of the grading and drainage plan set. 48. Prior to approval of the project -specific storm water quality management plan, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer, or his designee, a precise grading plan showing the location and elevations of existing topographical features, and showing the location and proposed elevations of proposed structures and drainage of the site. www.CityofRC.us Printed: 6/8/2020 389 Page 21 of 21