Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2019-10-23 Agenda Packet - PC-HPC CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Jan OCTOBER 23, 2019 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA A. 7:00 P.M. - CALL TO ORDER Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call: Chairman Guglielmo Vice Chairman Wimberly Commissioner Dopp Commissioner Munoz Commissioner Oaxaca B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Historic Preservation Commission or Planning Commission on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Commission from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Commission may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individual members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. C. CONSENT CALENDAR/HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Commission at one time without discussion.Any item may be removed for discussion. C1. Consideration to adopt Regular Meeting Minutes September 25, 2019. Page 1 of 5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Jan OCTOBER 23, 2019 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA D. PUBLIC HEARINGS/PLANNING COMMISSION The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chairman will open the public hearing to receive testimony. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual or less as determined by the Chairman. Please sign in after speaking. D1. TIME EXTENSION DRC2019-00428 -GOLDEN AVENUE DEVELOPMENT, INC. -A request to allow for a one (1) year time extension of a previously approved Tentative Tract Map (SUBTT17444) and a two (2) year time extension of Design Review (DRC2013-00583), Minor Exception DRC2013-00941, Minor Exception DRC2014-00358 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00942, related to a 13-unit condominium development on 2.17 acres of land in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (4 to 8 dwelling units per acre) located on the west side of Archibald Avenue and 150 feet north of Monte Vista Street - APNs: 0202-131-27, -61 and - 62. On October 10, 2007, a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts was adopted by the Planning Commission for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444. The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects or minor revisions to the projects within the scope of the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. Map Extension and DR Extension. D2. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM20101 — DOUGLAS LAW — A request to subdivide an existing 34,849 square feet (0.80 acre) vacant lot into three lots, located in the Low (L) residential district located at 7745 Vineyard Avenue; APN: 0208-091-44. This item is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA guidelines under CEQA Section 15315 — Minor Land Divisions. D3. DESIGN REVIEW DRC2018-00946 - SUNSET VISTA DESIGNS COMPANY, INC. - A request for site plan and architectural review of an industrial building totaling 33,067 square feet on 1.67 acres of land located west of Hickory Avenue and south of Arrow Route in the General Industrial (GI) District at 13261 Arrow Route; APN: 0229-171-17, -18. This item is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA guidelines under CEQA Section 15332 — In-Fill Development Projects. Page 2of5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Jan OCTOBER 23, 2019 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA D4. HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2018-01014 — RAMY IBRAHIM (Owner Kaivan Mashkotiazad) —A request for site plan and architectural review of a proposed 4,040 square foot single-family residence with an attached 435 square foot garage on a 10,411 square foot lot within the Low (L) Residential District and within the Hillside Overlay District at 7563 Alta Cuesta Drive -APN: 0207-044-29. This item is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA guidelines under CEQA Section 15303 — New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures, which permits the construction of a single-family residence in a residential zone. D5. MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT DRC2019-00822 — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA— A request to amend Titles 16 (Subdivisions) and 17 (Development Code) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to modify administrative procedures, correct errors, and clarify standards for entertainment permits, accessory dwelling units, parking space dimensions, and drive aisle dimensions. This item is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA guidelines under CEQA Section 15061(b)(3). This item will be forwarded to City Council for final action. E. COMMISSION BUSINESS/HISTORIC PRESERVATION AND PLANNING COMMISSION INTER-AGENCY UPDATES: COMMISSION ANNOUNCEMENTS: F. ADJOURNMENT I, Elizabeth Thornhill, Executive Assistant of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on October 17, 2019, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. Page 3of5 CITY OF RANCHO ■ . CUCAMONGA �l OCTOBER 23, 2019 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting,please contact the Planning Department at(909)477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. After speaking, please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium. It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under"Public Comments." There is opportunity to speak under this section prior to the end of the agenda. Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners. A copy of any such materials should also be provided to the Secretary to be used for the official public record. All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing. Requests for scheduling agenda items will be at the discretion of the Commission and the Planning Director. AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. These documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., except for legal City holidays. Page 4 of 5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Jan OCTOBER 23, 2019 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of $3,114 for all decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). Please turn off all cell phones while the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas, staff reports and minutes can be found at www.CitvofRC.us. Page 5of5 VicinityMap Historic Preservation and PlanningCommission Meeting October 23 , 2019 I f E �2 o c I a J 4 2 2 y Pd �� I l a► ire 07 1S St i Base Line /Base t J Chu rch Church Foothill A Foothill N 7,7 A E ! Arrow Arrow c m d J4 may c 8th LU D4 a _ i C7 6th 0 H c 6th W Lt :� 4th = � 4th D2 � Meeting Location: City Hall/Council Chambers D1 10600 Civic Center Drive D1: TIME EXTENSION DRC2019-00428 D2: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM20101 D3: DESIGN REVIEW DRC2018-00946 D4: HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2018-01014 D5: MUNICPAL CODE AMENDMENT DRC2019-00822 CITY . ■ , CUCAMONGA SEPTEMBER 25, 2019 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA A. 7:00 P.M. - CALL TO ORDER 7:00p► Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call: Chairman Guglielmo _x Vice Chairman Wimberly _x Commissioner Dopp _x Commissioner Munoz x Commissioner Oaxaca x Additional Staff Present: Nick Ghirelli, Assistant City Attorney, Brian Sandona, Senior Civil Engineer, Mike Smith, Principal Planner;Mena Abdul-Ahad,Assistant Planner; Sean McPherson, Senior Planner; Elizabeth Thornhill, Executive Assistant B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Historic Preservation Commission or Planning Commission on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Commission from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Commission may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individual members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. Chairman Guglielmo opened the public communications. Seeing none, closed. Page 1 of 6 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Jan SEPTEMBER 25, 2019 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA C. CONSENT CALENDAR/HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Commission at one time without discussion.Any item may be removed for discussion. C1. Consideration to adopt Regular Meeting Minutes of August 28, 2019. (September 11tn meeting was canceled.) Moved by Munoz, second by Wimberly; carried 5-0-0 D. PUBLIC HEARINGS/PLANNING COMMISSION The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chairman will open the public hearing to receive testimony. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual or less as determined by the Chairman. Please sign in after speaking. D1. TIME EXTENSION DRC2019-00564— RICHLAND COMMUNITIES —A request for a one (1) year time extension for a previously approved Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18908—The subdivision of approximately 10.6 acres into 30 single-family detached lots within the Low (L) Residential District, Etiwanda North Specific Plan located at the northwest corner of East Avenue and Wilson Avenue —APN: 1087-081-25. Mena Abdul-Ahad, Assistant Planner, gave the Staff Report and Power Point presentation (copy on file). Mr. John Schafer represents the project applicant and was available to answer any questions. There were no questions for Mr. Schafer and Commissioners thanked him for his time. Commissioner Munoz expressed everything sounds standard and supports permitting the extension. Page 2of6 CITY . ■ , CUCAMONGA SEPTEMBER 25, 2019 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA Commissioner Wimberly stated he concurs with Commissioner Munoz and the additional information application brought forward. He approves this extension as well. Commissioner Oaxaca mentioned he does not see any issues with this request for extension. Sees no issues. Commissioner Dopp thanked Mena for her Staff Report and added, he concurs. No real problems. One of the concerns from residences in area are environmental issues and good to see there were no changes and we are moving forward. Commissioner Guglielmo expressed he concurs and has nothing to add. Moved by Wimberly, seconded by Oaxaca; carried 5-0-0. D2. HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2018-01013 — RAMY IBRAHIM (Owner Amy Crow) — A request for site plan and architectural review of a proposed 3,030 square foot single-family residence with an attached 866 square foot garage on a 20,000 square foot lot within the Very Low (VL) Residential District, the Hillside Overlay, and the Equestrian Overlay at 5034 Via Verde — APN: 1061-201-09. This item is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA guidelines under CEQA Section 15303 — New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures. Chairman Guglielmo recused himself due to living within 500 feet to this proposed project. Announced Vice Chairman Wimberly will take over. Mena Abdul-Ahad, Assistant Planner, gave the Staff Report and Power Point presentation (copy on file). Commissioner Dopp asked, if there were any concerns from residences on view obstructions or any feedback? Mena Abdul-Ahad answered, no. We did not receive any feedback or calls. Commissioner Dopp thanked Mena for her Staff Report. Expressed the house looks wonderful and very well designed. He likes the architectural feature, the patio on first floor along with the design elements. It fits in with the neighborhood. All houses are very similar style. Looks forward to seeing it. Thanked owner for applying and building our City. Page 3of6 CITY . ■ , CUCAMONGA SEPTEMBER 25, 2019 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA Commissioner Oaxaca expressed he likes the design. It will be a nice addition to that neighborhood. Commissioner Munoz agreed with all comments. It will fit right in. A lovely designed home. He supports the approval of this project. Vice Chairman and Acting Chairman Wimberly, mentioned he agrees with his fellow commissioners. Moved by Munoz, seconded by Dopp; with the Conditions of Approval provided this evening. carried 4-0-1, Guglielmo recuse. Chairman Guglielmo resumed his position as Chairman and continued the meeting. E. COMMISSION BUSINESS/HISTORIC PRESERVATION AND PLANNING COMMISSION INTER-AGENCY UPDATES: Commissioner Munoz announced the League of CA Cities will be holding their conference in Long Beach on October 16-18, 2019 and he will be attending. COMMISSION ANNOUNCEMENTS: Vice Chairman Wimberly expressed how much he enjoyed the Red Carpet Event to honor the City of Rancho Cucamonga Board Member's and Commissioners on September 16`" at the loamosa House. Thank you. F. ADJOURNMENT Moved by Wimberly, second by Oaxaca to adjournment the meeting; carried 5-0-0. Adjourned at 7:38pm I, Elizabeth Thornhill, Executive Assistant of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on September 19, 2019, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. Page 4 of 6 CITY OF RANCHO ■ . CUCAMONGA �l SEPTEMBER 25, 2019 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting,please contact the Planning Department at(909)477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. After speaking, please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium. It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under"Public Comments." There is opportunity to speak under this section prior to the end of the agenda. Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners. A copy of any such materials should also be provided to the Secretary to be used for the official public record. All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing. Requests for scheduling agenda items will be at the discretion of the Commission and the Planning Director. AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. These documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., except for legal City holidays. Page 5of6 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Jan SEPTEMBER 25, 2019 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of $3,114 for all decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). Please turn off all cell phones while the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas, staff reports and minutes can be found at www.CityofRC.us. Page 6of6 RANCHOCITY OF ■ ■ STAFF REPORT DATE: October 23, 2019 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Anne McIntosh, Planning Director INITIATED BY: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSION DRC2019-00428 - GOLDEN AVENUE DEVELOPMENT, INC. - A request to allow for a one (1) year time extension of a previously approved Tentative Tract Map (SUBTT17444) and a two (2) year time extension of Design Review (DRC2013-00583), Minor Exception DRC2013-00941, Minor Exception DRC2014-00358 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00942, related to a 13-unit condominium development on 2.17 acres of land in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (4 to 8 dwelling units per acre) located on the west side of Archibald Avenue and 150 feet north of Monte Vista Street - APNs: 0202-131-27, - 61 and -62. On October 10, 2007, a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts was adopted by the Planning Commission for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444. The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects or minor revisions to the projects within the scope of the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval a DRC2019-00428 to allow for a one (1) year time extension of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444 and a two (2) year time extension of Design Review DRC2013-00358, Minor Exception DRC2013-00941, Minor Exception DRC2014-00358, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2013- 00942 through the adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval. BACKGROUND: On October 10, 2007, the Planning Commission approved Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444 and Design Review DRC2005-00250 for the subdivision and design review of a 2.17-acre parcel of land for the development of 13 detached condominiums. That approval included a related Zoning Map Amendment (DRC2005-00523) to change the Zoning Designation from Medium (M) Residential District to Low Medium (LM) Residential District, to bring the zoning for the project site into conformance with the General Plan Land Use Designation. The City Council approved the related Development District Amendment (DRC2005-00523) on November 7, 2007. The original Tentative Tract Map approval was for three (3) years, with an expiration date of October 10, 2010. However, through a series of Assembly and Senate Bills, the State legislature granted multiple time extensions for tentative maps throughout the State, which extended the expiration date of the subject Tentative Tract Map to October 10, 2017. The Planning Commission approved two separate one (1) year time extensions of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17744 on November 8, 2017, and November 28, 2018. These time extensions were requested to provide time for the City to complete an approved storm drain improvement on 19th Street. Completion of City storm drain system improvements would remove the project site from a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TIME EXTENSION DRC2019-00428 — GOLDEN AVENUE DEVELOPMENT, INC. October 23, 2019 Page 2 flood zone and eliminate a current Engineering Department condition of approval to construct an enlarged onsite storm drain system to capture the existing stormwater runoff from the adjacent mobile home park. The 19t" Street storm drain project has since been placed on hold pending funding. The related Design Review entitlement (DRC2005-00250) expired on October 10, 2012. Subsequently, the applicant submitted a new application for the Design Review of the 13-unit condominiums (DRC2013-00583). This entitlement included Minor Exception DRC2013-00941, to permit a wall above the height limit along Archibald Avenue for noise attenuation purposes, Minor Exception DRC2014- 00358, to permit walls above the height limit due to onsite grade changes between adjacent lots, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00942, for the removal of up to 39 onsite trees. These entitlements were reviewed by the Design and Technical Review Committees on June 3, 2014, and were approved by the Planning Commission on February 11, 2015. Design Review DRC2013-00583, Minor Exception DRC2013-00941, Minor Exception DRC2014-00358, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00942 are set to expire on February 11, 2020. The applicant is requesting a two (2) year time extension to provide time to complete the final map process with the Engineering Department. SITE DESCRIPTION: The project site is located on the west side of Archibald Avenue and north of Monte Vista Street, adjacent to the Chaparral Heights Mobile Home Park. The site is covered with ornamental grasses, shrubs, and trees and is traversed by an open stormwater facility. A. Project Density: 6 dwelling units per acre (4 to 8 dwelling units per acre permitted) B. The existing General Plan and zoning designation for the project site and the surrounding properties are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Vacant Land Low Medium Low Medium (LM) Residential District Residential (4 to 8 Dwelling Units Per Acre) North Mobile Home Park Low Medium Low Medium (LM) Residential District Residential (4 to 8 Dwelling Units Per Acre) South Single-Family Medium (M) Residential District Residences Medium Residential (8 to 14 Dwelling Units Per Acre) East Single-Family Low Medium Low Medium (LM) Residential District Residences Residential (4 to 8 Dwelling Units Per Acre) West Mobile Home Park Low Medium Low Medium (LM) Residential District Residential (4 to 8 Dwelling Units Per Acre) ANALYSIS: A. Prior Approvals and Automatic Extensions: This Time Extension application is a request to extend the approval period of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444 for one (1) year to October 10, 2020. The original approval of SUBTT17444 was on October 10, 2007, for a time period of three (3) years. The original expiration date was on October 10, 2010. However, subsequent to approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444, the State Legislature passed a series of Assembly/Senate PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TIME EXTENSION DRC2019-00428 — GOLDEN AVENUE DEVELOPMENT, INC. October 23, 2019 Page 3 Bills automatically extending the approval period of various active tentative maps throughout the State. Specifically, State Bill (SB) 1185 extended the approval period one (1) year to October 10, 2011; Assembly Bill (AB) 333 extended the approval period two (2)years to October 10, 2013; Assembly Bill (AB) 208 extended the approval period two (2) years to October 10, 2015; and Assembly Bill (AB) 116 extended the approval period two (2) years to October 10, 2017. The Planning Commission approved two separate one (1) year time extensions for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444 on November 8, 2017, and November 28, 2018, which extended the expiration date to October 10, 2018 and October 10, 2019, respectively. B. Time Extension Request (Tentative Map): The applicant is requesting a 3rd one (1) year time extension of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444 to allow time to complete the final map process. Following this time extension request, if approved, the applicant has the opportunity to request up to 2 additional one-year time extensions. A breakdown of the approvals and previous time extension are as follows: Tentative Tract Map 17444 Approyal History Approval Approval Expiration Approving Authority Approval/Extension Type Period Date Date Planning Commission Original Approval 3 Years 10/10/07 10/10/10 Senate Bill 1185 Automatic Extension 1 Year 10/10/11 Assembly Bill 333 Automatic Extension 2 Years 10/10/13 Assembly Bill 208 Automatic Extension 2 Years 10/10/15 Assembly Bill 116 Automatic Extension 2 Years 10/10/17 Planning Commission Time Extension DRC2017-00755 1 Year 11/08/17 10/10/18 Planning Commission Time Extension DRC2018-00816 1 Year 11/28/18 10/10/19 Planning Commission Time Extension DRC2019-00428 1 Year 10/09/19 10/10/20 C. Time Extension Request (Design Review and Related Entitlements): The applicant is also requesting a two (2) year time extension of Design Review DRC2013-00583, Minor Exception DRC2013-00941, Minor Exception DRC2014-00358, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00942 to provide time for the final map process to be completed. If approved, the applicant may request one additional one (1) year time extension. A breakdown of the approvals and previous time extension are as follows: Design Review DRC2013-00583, Minor Exception DRC2013-00941, Minor Exception DRC2014-00358, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00942 Approval History Approval Approval Expiration Approving Authority Approval/Extension Type Period Date Date Planning Commission Original Approval 5 Years 02/11/15 02/11/20 Planning Commission Time Extension DRC2019-00428 2 Years 9/25/19 02/11/22 D. Tentative Map Time Extensions: The Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code regulates the subdivision of land through Title 16 of the City's Municipal Code. Chapter 16.16 is applicable specifically to Tentative Maps (Five or More Parcels) and provides for time extension requests PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TIME EXTENSION DRC2019-00428— GOLDEN AVENUE DEVELOPMENT, INC. October 23, 2019 Page 4 through Section 16.16.170 - Extensions. Section 16.16.170.A states: "the subdivider or his representative may request an extension of the expiration date of the approved or conditionally approved tentative map by written application to the community development department. The application shall be filed not less than 60 days prior to the expiration date and shall state the reasons for requesting the extension."The application to extend SUBTT17444 was submitted on June 6, 2019, and includes a letter outlining the reasons for requesting the extension (Exhibit C). E. Time Extensions (General): Time extensions, other than tentative maps, are regulated by Section 17.14.090 of the Development Code. Any permit not exercised within five (5) years of approval shall expire and become void, except where an extension of time is approved. Development Code Section 17.14.090 states that "the same approval authority that granted the original permit may extend the period within which the expiration date for two years from the original permit date. After this initial permit extension, a final on-year extension of time may be granted pursuant to the same process set forth in this section." Time extension requests must be received not less than thirty (30) days prior to the expiration date of the permit. F. Conformance with Development Code: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444 was designed to meet or exceed all development standards applicable to subdivisions in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District. Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444 is for the subdivision of air space for condominium purposes for the future sale of the 13 units approved for the project site. The subdivision remains in conformance with development standards for the Low Medium (LM) Residential District for multi-family developments. The project includes Design Review DRC2013-00583 for the design of the 13 detached units on the tentative map along with Minor Exception DRC2013-00941, to permit a wall above the height limit along Archibald Avenue for noise attenuation purposes, Minor Exception DRC2014-00358, to permit walls above the height limit due to onsite grades between lots, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00942, for the removal of up to 39 onsite trees, G. Public Art: Design Review DRC2013-00583 is subject to providing public art as outlined in Chapter 17.124 of the Development Code. H. Environmental Assessment: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration on October 10, 2007, in connection with the City's approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project unless: (i) substantial changes are proposed to the project that would indicate new or more severe impacts on the environment; (ii) substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the project was previously reviewed that indicate new or more severe environmental impacts, or(iii) new important information shows the project will have new or more severe impacts than previously considered; or (iv) additional mitigation measures are now feasible to reduce impacts or different mitigation measures can be imposed to substantially reduce impacts. Staff evaluated Time Extension DRC2019-00428 and concludes that substantial changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project have not occurred which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. A Biological Resources Survey Report (Vincent N. Scheidt; July 2019)was submitted as part of the time extension request (Exhibit B). The report concludes that no native habitat types occur onsite, and no federally listed species were observed or are expected to occur on the project site due to PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TIME EXTENSION DRC2019-00428— GOLDEN AVENUE DEVELOPMENT, INC. October 23, 2019 Page 5 lack of suitable native habitats, level of disturbance that has occurred to the site, and development of surrounding lands. No direct or indirect impact to federally listed species is anticipated from the project or the related Tentative Map Time Extension. The report does find that the drainage channel that traverses the project site before entering a City's storm drain system likely qualifies as jurisdictional waters. The Biological Habitat Assessment Report (Eilar Associates; July 12, 2005) submitted as part of the original environmental determination also concluded that the onsite drainage channel may be classified as jurisdictional waters that would necessitate permits from Federal, State and regional agencies. The original environmental determination did not include a mitigation measure requiring consultation with the regulating agencies to determine whether the onsite drainage facility qualifies as jurisdictional waters. To rectify this oversite, a condition of approval has been added to Time Extension DRC2019-00428 requiring consultation with the regulating agencies to determine whether permits will be required prior to the approval of any earth-moving activities. This new condition of approval is not the result of new environmental impacts or new information, rather it addresses an impact that was known when the original environmental determination was made. The application is for a one (1) year time extension of a previously approved tentative tract map and a two (2)year time extension of a previously approved design review and related files with no proposed changes to the scope of the original approval. With the inclusion of the condition of approval related to the onsite drainage channel, staff finds that the project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration, not have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less than significant. Therefore, pursuant to CEQA, staff recommends that the Planning Commission concur with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is required in connection with the City's consideration of Time Extension DRC2019-00428. FISCAL IMPACT: The project proponent will be responsible for paying one-time impact fees. These fees are intended to address the increased demand for City services due to the proposed project. The following types of services that these impact fees would support include the following: transportation, infrastructure, drainage infrastructure and police. The proposed development will increase the value of the project site and the lots will be assessed an annual property tax. A percentage of this annual tax is shared with the City. Additionally, the development will be required to create a CFD and each property will be assessed fees for the maintenance of the infrastructure related to the lots and fair share of improvements. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: Although a specific current City Council goal does not apply to this application, the proposed time extension for the subject 13-unit condominium project furthers the City Council's goal of enhancing premier community status by providing additional market-rate for-sale housing units on a 2.17-acre infill parcel. With the approval of the subject time extension, the project retains the entitlements to construct for-sale condominiums that will provide a transition of density of the appropriate scale from the single- family dwelling units to the south to the mobile home park located to the north and west. Additionally, the time extension request is consistent with the General Plan Policy LU-2.5, to promote complementary infill development that contributes positively to the surrounding residential land uses. The related project is conditioned to relocate the existing entrance to the adjacent mobile home park and to provide a new signalized intersection at Archibald Avenue and Victoria Street, greatly increasing the safe access to the adjacent mobile home park. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TIME EXTENSION DRC2019-00428 — GOLDEN AVENUE DEVELOPMENT, INC. October 23, 2019 Page 6 CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing with a regular page legal advertisement in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. No correspondence has been received related to the project or the notifications. EXHIBITS: Exhibit A Time Extension Request Letter Received August 8, 2019 Exhibit B Biological Resources Survey Report Dated July 2019 Exhibit C Planning Commission Staff Report Dated November 28, 2018, for Time Extension DRC2018-00816 with Exhibits including the original Staff Report with Exhibits and Resolution of Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444 Dated October 10, 2007) Exhibit D Planning Commission Staff Report DRC2013-00583 with exhibits and Resolutions of Approval for Design Review DRC2013-00583, Minor Exception DRC2013-00941, Minor Exception DRC2014-00358, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00942 Draft Resolution 19-59 Recommending Approval of Time Extension DRC2019-00428 for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444 Draft Resolution 19-60 Recommending Approval of Time Extension DRC2019-00428 for Design Review DRC2013-00583 Draft Resolution 19-61 Recommending Approval of Time Extension DRC2019-00428 for Minor Exception DRC2013-00941 Draft Resolution 19-62 Recommending Approval of Time Extension DRC2019-00428 for Minor Exception DRC2014-00358 Draft Resolution 19-63 Recommending Approval of Time Extension DRC2019-00428 for Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00942 Golden Avenue Development, Inc 10 Elk Grove Ln. Laguna Niguel, CA 92677 Tel: (626)278-6855 Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department Golden Avenue Development Inc owns a 13-unit condominium project, located on 6910 Archibald Ave. Rancho Cucamonga.The tentative tract map was approved a couple years ago.According to the conditional approval letter, the Project needs to clear of the flood zone area from FEMA. During 2017 and 2018, Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Department proposed to construct a storm drain system on 19th street to solve the flood problem of our property and the adjacent Mobile Home Park. In the past two years,we did nothing but waited for the storm drain to complete. However,due to lack of funding, the City determined to stop the storm drain project in 2019.Therefore,we have to resume the CLOMR process by ourselves.Since the condition of Final Map is to obtain the CLOMR, we need more time to finish up. Based on our engineer, the CLOMR process takes 6 to 9 months to complete.Thus, we expect the Final Map will be finished in April 2020.As a result,we need one more year extension to finalize the Final Map. Best Regards, Ye Liu Golden Avenue Development, Inc. EXHIBIT A Biological Resources Survey Report for the Mountain View Estates Project Tract Number 17444, Rancho Cucamonga Prepared far Golden Avenue Development,Inc. 10 Elk Grove Lane Laguna Niguel,CA 92677 Prepared by Vincent N.Scheidt Certified Biological Consultant 3158 Occidental Street San Diego,CA 92122 July 2019 Vincent N, Scheidt Certified Biological Consultant EXHIBIT B INTRODUCTION The approximately 2.64-acre Mountain View Estates property (APN 0202-131-27,61,and 62) in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California was examined for biological resources, regulated species,and jurisdictional wetlands/waters in July 2019. The project requires a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR),issued by the Federal Emergency Management Agency(FEMA), to alter a section of the 100-year FEMA floodplain.The project is to provide a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) which requires that the protect to be in compliance with the Federal Endangered Species Act(FESA) and that a"no take" determination be made by FEMA. The project site supports an approximately 0.05-acre drainage feature to be modified, which crosses the southern half of the property diagonally. METHODS To survey the Mountain View Estates project site, Vincent Scheidt and Brandon Myers, Biological Consultants, inspected the subject property on 18 July 2019. All areas of the property were examined directly, and the onsite drainage was examined to determine features and wetlands connectivity. All species of plants and animals encountered were inventoried (fable 1). The onsite vegetation-type was characterized, and a directed survey for Federally-Iisted Threatened and Endangered Species known from the area was completed. The site had been previously examined by EILAR Associates Environmental and Acoustical Consulting biologists in June of 2005. A copy of the EILAR report is attached (Attachment B). RESULTS The Mountain View Estates project site supports a single vegetation type: Disturbed Habitat. The site is generally flat with nearly 85% of the resident plants being disturbance-responsive, ruderal species or persisting ornamental shrubs and vines. Common indicator species include Ripgut Brome (Brofuus diandrus), Wild Oat(Avena fatua), Prickly Lettuce (Lactuca semola),Perennial Mustard (Hirsclifeldia incana), and many other weeds. A number mature trees and ornamental shrubs, such as olive, eucalyptus, pines, and others,are found onsite. Very few native species were detected.Two native Coast Live Oaks(Quercus agrifolia)are present on the project site. A complete list of the species detected is presented in Table 1. Federal Wetlands Waters A flood control channel runs from near the northwest corner of the property, where it enters from sheet flow off of an adjoining mobile home park, to the east. This extends to the southeastern corner of the property where it travels offsite within a concrete bottom channel until it ultimately enters an underground culvert beneath Monte Vista Street. This drainage is currently spanned by two small crossings; a four foot wide dirt crossing in the center of the property and a six foot wide concrete bridge at the eastern property Iimit. The onsite portion of this drainage is approximately 355 linear feet and 0.05 acre.The drainage likely qualifies as waters of the U.S. Federal Endangered Species Act Compliance The project is required to be in compliance with the FESA. Under the Act, the project can have no"take" of listed Threatened or Endangered Species.Section 2,Item (19)of the Endangered Species Act states, The term "take" iueruis to harass, hanrr, pursue, hunt, shoot, woruld, kill, trap, capture, or collect, or to attempt to engage in any such conduct.The project site supports no federally Endangered or Threatened Species and is therefore in compliance with the FESA. No take is proposed in conjunction with development of the project site. III 4• I 1 f � f >E'� 71 cm' yXL.`* ; . a hd I 1 �O yr.0- . `gr t ., � i fo n w I t n— �. n u 1 M .► w } . IbCUla}1Fjl f ` V � �♦ ��� Y i .f tr vt 59 v r f i •?'� � 'f [vnr ,mmw �.. �.. I,ly{, •;per �l ,.� ��` m/4T. y � I awr samL•1 J �`a:' �+.7` �� r 5r N n' � .q 4' �i' ems• - .. °"T'v �S 4t ! , castes i nun nun mu 1 1 f 1 4k a# z 4 �r���--='-�-;} lam• ,�`` .# wx 30 J4 K6 T Figure 3.Biological Resources on Aerial Photo-The Mountain View Estates Project Site 14. O • r • • • 1' 4 - •` W ❑ = Disturbed Habitat 0 = Coast Live Oak Trees _ =Onsite Drainage No Beale Table 1.Flora and Fauna Detected Onsite—The Mountain View Estates Project Site Scientific Name Common Name Acmnspon aniencamis Spanish Clover Ailamfhus allissima ' Tree of Heaven Albizia julibrissin * Persian Silk Tree Aniaranthus albus* Prostrate Pigweed Awaranthus palmen Palmer's Amaranth Ambrosia acauthicarpa Annual Bur-Sage Arbutus uncdo* Strawberry Tree Animdo doncu * Giant Reed Avena fatita* Wild Oat Bromtis diandnis * Ripgut Brome Centaurea melitensis* Maltese Star-Thistle Chemopodiurii album * Common Lamb's-Quarters Chenopodutnt morale* Nettle-leaved Goosefoot Convolvidus amensis * Field Bindweed Cynodon dacfylon * Bermuda Grass Cyperiis eragrosfis Tall Flatsedge Datura mrighlii Sacred Thorn-Apple Digitaria sangtiinalis* Hairy Crabgrass Diospyros kaki * Japanese Persimmon Echinoddoa cnis-gath Barnyardgrass Epitobiu m citiattuu Fringed Willowherb Erigeron canadensis* Common Horseweed Engeron bonanemsis` Flax-leaved Horseweed Eriobotnja japonica* Loquat Eticalyphis camaldulensis* River Redgum Euphorbia prostrata * Prostrate Spurges Fallopur scandens Climbing False Buckwheat Ficus carica* Common Fig Heliamthus aimuus* Common Sunflower Hirselifeldta ineama* Shortpod Mustard Hordeurn rrnirimm* Wall Barley Lachica serriola* Prickly Lettuce Lepidimm coronopus* Swine Cress Malva invaeensis * Bull Mallow Malva panlijlora* Cheeseweed Mallow Medicago saliva* Alfalfa Mehlof is albus* White Sweetclover Olea europaea* Olive Oxalis conucidala * Creeping Woodsorrel Parktnsonia andeata * Mexican Palo Verde Piirtis sp. * Pine Polycarpon letraphylhun * FourIeaf Manvseed Polygoman aviculare* Prostrate Knotweed Populus sp. * Poplar Pninus dulcis* Almond PseudognaphaIiunr luteoalbuni * Jersey Cudweed PseudognaphaIiunr inicrocephahun Feltleaf Everlasting Qt►ercus agnfolia Coast Live Oak Ricinus communis* Castor Bean Rubus anneniacus* Armenian Blackberry Schinus lerebimfhifolia* Brazilian Pepper solamumr mignon * Black Nightshade Sotichits oleraceits* Common Sow-Thistle Stipa inrtiacen* Smilo Grass Tnbulus terrestris* Puncture Vine vilis sp. * Grapevines Washingtonia robtista* Mexican Fan Palm Yucca gigantea* Spineless Yucca *=non native taxon Attachment A Site Photos 7-18-2019 ` 3 i - � .� •fir': � Nry � 1 r . } .04 '14 '� Photo 3. View showing the source of offsite sheet flow that drains onto the Mountain View Estates property. Flow runs off the hardscaping from the offsite mobile home park through a shallow concrete swale before entering the property from the west. w 1 3 - � 1 Photo 4. Dense weedy vegetation in the drainage on the far western edge of the site. This section of the drainage is vegetated heavily with non- native species and contains dumped trash and debris. Attachment B EILAR Associates Biology Report - -■{:� 1 .r r is-;' - •♦ _ .+1" _+•� •��, / � a +Y • �' 'ram k�5`}i`, �It-''�.��l�rT['F�y'��'t•�liiJi � 'i- r •�yL1�17�.:- ;��Y,��` �;�r�.�._r..� ���,—��� �i� � 3_. r,f- Tt` • � 1'r• II •' I I a•,.i 1JLl'V�ii.."Vi.� , � : � r ��r►�� him }�:ililr�, y,V ` i},•� � � .�+' •r • ■ !• N e CIO fflb �r,�, °� ;�i �QE- IT i� L .- � t' �t'ti *r�. '��r r��< sty. ,�'}'a •� �'r'- ? '�%i�;. s=. -i~#�•:�`J - -{•}- '���' '' '��r'� �' r/'.��l�U♦A",�' h '?r# .'y+ _ '�• '*rt is y� �: _ ` _ �'"' �•;' r {.� �. yy '���fi,~J. �i..y,?:.,�•�,,i.F!"�":_4'4 ���. 7� � �� r• - *r� {rr. �'` }''�f -- v�l� ���-._L'�i ' -��y� ti' �,''i ' f' #+:�' �% s_r .�� 1+1..3�•1;; .'+h:�/ .�4f+� J t `r!fy {1r4 ~ �'1♦++ ~ � � ��.-� 'w'`?�? 'r -vo�' �'r5x. _:, .:!ri=mil 1.0 INTRODUCTION At your request, HDR, Inc. conducted a general biological survey within the 2.64-acre proposed Rancho Cucamonga Condominium Development Project (CDP) site located in Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California. The purpose of the general biological survey was to identify, quantify, and map any sensitive habitats and sensitive or listed animal or plant species. This letter report addresses 4� and analyzes potential development constraints on this property and details the results of HDR's recent k� survey. 2.0 PROJECT LOCATION The 2.64-acre CDP site is located within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, immediately west of Archibald rl Avenue, north of Monte Vista Street, and east of East Street; approximately 8-miles north of Interstate 10 U and approximately 8-miles west of Interstate 15(Figure 1). 3.0 SITE PHYSICAL CONDITIONS 3.1 Topography The site ranges in elevation from approximately 1,437-feet Average Mean Sea Level (AMSL) at the northern property boundary to approximately 1,420-feet AMSL at the southern property boundary west of Archibald Avenue. The study area's general topographic character consists of relatively flat terrain with a flood control charnel traversing the property from near the center of the western property boundary to the n southeastern comer. U 3.2 Historical and Current Land Uses The 2.64-acre CDP site appears to have been the location of a home or ranch site in the past as evidenced by several mature fruit trees and various landscaped (exotic)plant species. The property is in a state of vegetative overgrowth and no current uses of the property were evident. The property is surrounded by n older single-family residences and mobile homes. U 4.0 SURVEY METHODS AND LIMITATIONS A general biological survey was conducted on the 2.64-acre CDP site on June 17 2005 by HDR, Inc. Senior Wildlife Ecologist, Robert M. Faught and Senior Wildlife Biologist, Julie B. Alpert. The entire project site was accessed on foot over routes that provided for the direct observation of the entire site. All sensitive habitats and plant species were mapped on an aerial photograph. The sides exhibited 100% cloud cover,with a starting and ending temperature of 63 degrees Fahrenheit;with winds at 24 miles per hour out of the southwest. a a Rm=W Cucamonga Condominlum Pr*ct 1 Ellar Associates July 2OD5 Fit AMW w. , -t__. [�• ..,-�' -��- ,= i' Tyr �#, PROJECT �'•''ir���i'���...�.�._� %��� '1 f.��ri� Ill; LOCATION of "WIF. � I! ! i V srA;`4 Clean Water Act Jurisdiction Following the U.S. Supreme Court's Decision � in Ra ands v. United States & Carabell v. United States � R} rqL ApOS P ..� . This memorandum provides guidance to EPA regions and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers ["Corps"] districts implementing the Supreme Court's decision in the consolidated cases Ra anos v. United States and Carabell v. United States' (herein referred to simply as"Ravanos")which address the jurisdiction over waters of the United States under the Clean Water Act.2 The chart below summarizes the key points contained in this memorandum. This reference tool is not a substitute for the more complete discussion of issues and guidance fumished throughout the memorandum. Summary ofeKey Points The agendeswMassert jurisdiction over the following waters: • Tmdltlonal navigable waters • Wetlands-adjacent to traditions]navigable waters • Non-navigable tributaries ortxatltHonal navigable waters that are relatively permanent. where the tributaries typically flow year-round or have continuous flow atilemt seasowXy(e g,typically1bree months) • Wetlands thatidirectliyvbutsuch tributaries The agencies liM decide juri dicdoo over tbe-following waters based on wbel-apedfic-analysts to determine w'hether:tbey have a significant urxas with a traditional navigable water: • NonnnnAgable hibutaries that are not4reladvely permanent • Wetlands*Qacentto non-navigable:txibutaries that are not relatively permanenb • Wetlands-adjacent to but that do not directly abut a relatively permanent non-navigable tributary The agencies generally will not assort juri orlon over the following features: • Swab or-erosional features.(e.g.,gudles,small washes characterized below volume, bifreguent,or short dnration Bow) • Ditebes(including roadside•ditches)excavated wholly in and draining only uplands and that do notcatty a relatively permanentAbw of water The agencies willappiy the significant nexus standard as follows: • A signilleantneims analysis-will asseu-the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functionsprrtormed by all wetlands adjacentto the tributary to deter ailbe If they signiticantly aff'eetthe chemical,physical and biological integrity of downstream traditional navigable waters • SlZWOuntaexus includes consideration of hydrologic and ecologic factors I26 S.Ct.2208(2006). ` 33 U.S.C.§1251 It M. June 5.2007 Cleary Water Act Jurisdiction 5:0 BIOLOGICAL SURVEY RESULTS 5.1 Vegetation Communities Vegetation communities are assemblages of plant species that usually coexist in the same area. The classification of plant communities is based upon the life form of the dominant species within that community and associated flora. The vegetation types follow Holland(1986); however,the site does not comprise any specific natural vegetation community. Scientific and common names follow that of Baldwin et al. (2002), Hickman (1993), or Moody (2000). One vegetation community was identified within the 2.64-acre CDP site: Landscaped and Exotic (Figure 2 and Appendix A — Site Photographs). U The vegetation community delineated within the 2.64-acre CDP site is described as Landscaped and Exotic due to the pre-dominance of landscaped and exotic plants. There is a very small percentage of native species present on-site. Plants identified on-site are described in Table 1. 6.0 SENSITIVE HABITATS 6.1 Sensitive Habitats (� Sensitive habitats are generally defined as vegetation communities or wildlife habitats that support u Federal or State listed, rare, sensitive, and endemic plant and animal species. The 2.64-acre CDP site does not support any sensitive habitat type. However, the flood control channel may be considered jurisdictional under Federal and/or State laws and regulations. These may include Federal Clean Water Act protecting all navigable waters and wetlands of the United States and Section 1600 of the State Fish and Game Code protecting wetlands and associated species. 6.1.1 Wetlands and Jurisdictional Waters of the United States a The 2.64acre CDP site contains one flood control channel that traverses the property in an east to southeast direction. This flood control channel is approximately 5104eet long throughout the property and approximately 6- to 8-feet wide (average width). This flood control channel captures urban run-off from the adjacent mobile home park and enters the CDP site onto a short section of concreted rock-rip which ends where the channel narrows and the soft bottom begins. The flood control channel becomes heavily vegetated along the banks and bottom and continues in a southeast direction. There is a short section of soft bottom with an older cobblestone rock wall near the southeast corner of the property. n Where the cobblestone wall ends, the channel is bridged by what may have been the original Archibald L! Avenue. Immediately east of this bridge, the channel has a concrete bottom with cobblestone sides and continues southward toward Monte Vista Street where it appears to flow into an underground pipeline. There is one culvert located approximately 315-feet from the eastern end of the flood control channel. This culvert allows for a now abandoned road crossing of the flood control channel. It is assumed that the construction date of this channel is approximately 1938 as exhibited on a concrete placard within the cobblestone wall area. U I f � Rancho Cucamonga CondamlW mr Pmlect 3 E31ar Associates 4J July 2005 PROJECT LOCATION Not 16 sale LEGEND ....... Flood Control Channel Soft Bottom with Vegetation ....... Flood Control Channel with Rock Rip Rap or Concrete Bottom Coast Live Oak Individual Abandoned Road Crossing with Culvert in Flood Control Channel RGURE 2. Biological Resources Map 2.64-Acre Rancho Cucamonga Condominium Development Project Rancho Cucenlonge Condw9fifum Pr*ct 4 Ellor Associates July 2005 a Table 1 2.64Acre Rancho Cucamonga Condominium Development Project Site Botanical Species List Jacaranda(Jacaranda mimosifolia) Almond(Prunus sp.) - English Walnut(Juglaus regia) California Fan Palm(Washinglonla ftlifera) Brazilian Pepper Tree(Schinus lerebinthifolius) African Sumac(Rhos lances) Pine(Pirnrs sp.) Bamboo(Barnbusa sp.) Giant Reed(Arrmdo donor) Palo Verde(Cercidium sp.) Fig Tree(Ficus carica) Kumquat Tree(Fortunella sp.) Mock Orange Tree(Philadelphus sp.) Eucalyptus(Eucalyptus sp.) Pampass Grass(Cortaderia sp.) Bermuda Grass(Cynodon dactylon) Slender Wild Oat(Avenafatua) Common Mallow(Malva neglecta) R� Ripgut Grass(Broarus diandrus) l I Prickly Ox-Tongue(Sonchus asper) Dandelion(Taraxacum sp.) Clover(Trfohum sp.) t Echinochloa(Echinochloa cars galh) Castor Bean(Ricinus communis) Horseweed(Conyza canadensis) Jimson Weed(Dalura rvrightir) Blackberry(Rubus ursinus) Curly Dock(Runrex crispus) Caterpillar Phacelia(Phacelia cicularia) Bind Weed(Convolvulus sp.) Sweet Clover(Melilotus leuca) Field Mustard(Hirselifeldia incana) Red-Stern Filaree(Erodium cicularirrnr) Telegraph Weed(Heterotheca grandiora) Black Willow(Salix goodingii) Barley(Hordeum sp.) Horehound(Mamrbiuni vulgare) Wild Radish(Raphanus saliva) Lupine(Lupinus bicolor) California Poppy(Eschscholzia califandca) Giant Yucca(Yucca elephantipes) Douglas Mugwort(Artenrisia douglasiana) i Coast Live Oak(Quercus agrlfolia) U U Rancho Cucamonga Condominium Project 5 Eller Associates July 2005 a aIt is unknown where the flow originates or terminates. There are no corresponding "blue-fines" on the t U.S.G.S. topographic map. The flood control channel does exhibit cut and defined banks with scoured surface (meeting the Federal definition of jurisdictional waters), however, if storm water nun-off was diverted from this channel, it may be assumed that most of the vegetation along the banks and within the channel would die back. Where jurisdictional waters become vegetated, the designation changes from waters to wetlands based on the following three Federal wetland criteria: At least periodically,the land supports predominantly hydrophytes(plants whose habitat is water or very wet places); the substratum is predominantly undrained hydric soil; or the substratum is non-soil and is saturated with water or covered by water some time during the growing season of each year. 7.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Potential development of the property could be constrained by the presence of the flood control channel and potential Federal and/or State jurisdiction over the waters and/or wetlands within the flood control channel. Based on the description of the flood control channel and existing conditions,it is not readily apparent as to the legal jurisdiction of this flood control channel. It is therefore recommended that a batching meeting be held with the State and Federal agencies to determine the proper jurisdiction of this flood control channel. Should the Flood control channel be determined as jurisdictional under the Federal and/or State laws and regulations,the following would apply. (� 7.1 Jurisdictional Waters and Wetland Permitting Requirements Ll Impacts to Federal and State jurisdictional waters and wetlands may require the procurement of certain n permits, memorandums, and waivers pursuant to established codes and laws of the Army Corps of Lj Engineers (Section 404 of the Clean Water Act), the State Water Resources Control Board / Regional Water Quality Control Board (Section 401), and the California Department Fish and Game (Section 1600). The resource agencies involved in this process may dictate additional mitigation measures depending upon the type and size of impacts to waters and wetlands. Additional mitigation measures for temporary impacts on-site may include the re-contouring of the impacted areas to pre-construction grades, the restoration of native plants within the impact areas, and enhancement of sections of the unnamed swales with riparian vegetation(depending upon hydrology and soils). Any temporary or permanent disturbance to wetlands or waters will require a Streambed Alteration Agreement pursuant to Section 1600 of the Fish and Game Code. Temporary or permanent disturbance to more than 0.10-acre Federal jurisdictional waters or wetlands will necessitate notification to the Army Corps of Engineers under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act for an individual permit; overall impacts of [� less than 0.10-acre may fall under the exemptions allowed within the Nationwide Permit structure. If a �} 404 individual permit is required then the Regional Water Quality Control Board must be notified pursuant to Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. Prior to the issuance of a 404 individual permit, the RWQCB will issue either a Certification or a Waiver. Any mitigation measures imposed will become incorporated into the 404 individual permit. a a mlRancho Cucamonga Cand=Wum Pict 6 EI3ar Assadetes .iuly 2005 8.0. BIBLIOGRAPHY California Department of Fish and Game. 1999. 1990 Annual Report on the Status of the California's State Listed Threatened and Endangered Plants and Animals. CNPS. 2001. Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants of California {sixth edition}. Rare Plant Scientific Advisory Committee, David P. Tibor, Convening Editor. California Native Plant Society. Sacramento,CA x+388pp. Hiclunan, J. C., ed. 1993. The Jepson Manual, Higher Plants of California. University of California Press,Berkeley. 1400 pp. Holland, R. F. 1986. Preliminary Descriptions of the Terrestrial Natural Communities of California. Non Game Heritage Program. State of California, Department of Fish and Game, Sacramento. 157 pp. Mooney,M. 2000. Encyclopedia of Flowers. Fog City Press,San Francisco. 304pp. n 9.0 CERTIFICATION u CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibitslappendices present the data and information required for this biological evaluation, and that the facts,statements,and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. {1 Signed: Date: July 11.2005 [[�� Julie B.Alpert Title: Senior Wildlife Biologist U U LJ Q � Rancho Cucamonga Condwifnlum ftlect 7 EIlar Assoclates July 2005 a a a a a a r� o APPENDIX A Site Photographs a D a a Q nJ Rancho Cucamonga ConbmWum pr*d Ellar Associates a1 L� July 2005 L} M 'ti�Y ti�� •:yam 1 R#4� e •J.••' SLR �� � � ���Y.}�� r •• T � r r. i • A to i a Photo 1. Rancho Cucamonga CDP Site Southerly View of Flood Control Channel Entering at West End of Property r U Photo 2. Rancho Cucamonga CDP Site Southerly View of Flood Control Channel Entering at hest End of Property Rancho CucemaVs CondgmW m Project Eller Associates 1 L.` July 2005 a a ! 4B a l y a Photo 3. Rancho Cucamonga CDP Site Easterly View to West Side of Flood Control Channel Near Center of Property a a a Y a a a Photo 4. Rancho Cucamonga CDP Site Westerly View to East Side of Flood Control Channel Near Center of Property a a a Rancho Cucamonga Condma** n FrvjW Ellar kssoclalas 1 L.l July 2005 1 r ",c I y`k�' �i•f 't' '!rk'C'��� ' I Cr�.';*��'u�,; - ? `%r .y�11 ��„ - Photo 1 RanchoCucamonga ' Site Southerly I Southeastern PropertyCorner and Flood 1Control Channel �� ,I Ij�ti�•a!� f��4 � •�..�I Y � ' '�} � '1' _ r` u• � "awl-' 1 ' rT 'r " ✓R4' #' K � ' j ' •,r� �r" r 'q ti Photo 1 Rancho Cucamonga Easterly View of Abandoned RoadCrossing andCulvert1 Flood Control Channel ' Center I 1Property Rancho I 11 1 - � L i �`� •Y�.'.�--�•' � ••�L ems' `y��� :!�'• „ _ j r'.r 'r' � 1 ±.'+�`�'f. '��`; is Photo RanchoCucamonga1 ' Site Easterly View 1 Flood Control Channel I I I ' I Cobblestone Where Channel I " I (original andWhere Channel Southward ' Toward Monte cl'"��`�,�:>.- '• err ���F�7 � � �1•' Photo Rancho Cucamonga ; ' Site Northerly View 1Flood Control Channel Where Channel (original andWhere Channel Southward TowardMonte Street Ranch' 1,1 r� ' � •s• h 1 ' Photo Rancho Cucamonga Concrete Rood Control Channel 1 andDateI Construction 1 t � �^� �1f "a��,. �%�F�F���1.71F� L+•� r�s 5Y �4��4 `4 � '� ���YI +1�,1},• ,�(� fyF.� " } .�t•.1{.,`�.4 � Y ii;Al'll i�rf 4�� 1 " �Yl• J Y' YtiN.y � • .�;C' `r�.y� `��+�; i .yam. +_ � �'+-:i i / i ;I�� } rl��=� Photo 1 Rancho CucamongaF ' Site Northerly Towards Northeastern Property Corner FromNear Center1 Property andAdjacent 1ArchibaldAvenue Rancho CUCaMMfi +Y f .f� L I fy 1 i i feu . '.'..} ' k+4 �- ��.'� �- *7'�. ;•'i}� ;•f"t- :F'•'tC}S�rr'+ry�l'I¢y¢77tS; -' �+ t - - � F- '�''1+SLL ar*; `->v,, � .� s, ••i y.�i :�I-,, � y��;�F��rir:'lf; I ' Rancho Cucamonga CDP SoutherlySouthwestern Property West of Flood Control Channel IDERRwdm L -July 2005 t 1✓/1N. .� .�J� �11� _. � �\ "•l'/,. .^ham, L !71 1 '• .1�1 T;�C7 •' e�'�w C:i,f1 i;;' �' '��7-III'":'' ��,rl r ;, �i:�•.•• ,:.".�tili'1.� �t 1 j�-nlyp��l��j� S:j•. ����n �'� r /��L{ `'���r' n. {1"•:' r2 y��t,�':t :5'7.f. 1� r.:Y�1f'��!!: I'.,:. '�7[y� i�t':1 t n; ��,�I•:7j«l�r1i;,' ;.1�;'l:°y.�5.�!¢;/,� , �,4r!f- ��;::1-Sty .::.��; ' �C rti'ur�� ti k�t��� ! Y'y.i 4>(++l '�i=.}r S.i•''��' if���L�lx i,.S;,;'' .�i'��.t.��1.- �T '.•., ti •.1 r.1 .) r; .4'i'r�;1;��r1' r: T.-�-..�.h�i. ,�i„r � .;,''�T���;� ��r,:•� " .'7,!}1' w_ .;j'r� lr,4j�iz�vi f�,•!;,''•'�'.�,.}�{��l.T�ir{�F'�j- >Y'�~J.�"��' t L:''�{.t' f !^,i�'':1..R��!��,��;iL'��IM1� "_~+•,I�:}i�� �'i�.:,iy.�y.l:'�i YT•l,� •tii e V: � !,�.3: ,ter.i-'T•ar����:1I,�7.t=. � � i4'f:♦��7'"t��"4�•F 41:�! f�1�+i� xh __ �-1,� •L .ro s,:'';..h.1r�.1�,'a,,{I�.:l��f� 'lei-... its: _. Lt_.-�'�':::'���!-1_.' Photo Rancho Cucamonga Photo 1 CoastLocated East1 Flood Control Channel 1 July 41 fF.iti' �? •f't'.§tip -•��—,I�� ��\< 5�� �� s,' �d��.:��;y�' �,tL�f�•_der rt.�� - �> s, '� -. r~'n.4 C,:,�nt.4�:�T%:' JY� r '!,'i�i!"� •i•U��� Iti,. 1 Y . ..�. -tt,'*Ar'•.. a j.-.,[,� CRY •n �:, ,_ ~�• ', ,_'�:z::�.��a:'L'����f�1:1_.�?S��r�'��[iS:tt." -.'1!t L ]E�' •1 �' ., 4 ''r� Photo Rancho Cucamonga CDP Site West Bank of the Flood Control Channel Photo of Coast Live Oak Located on the IDRRwwh July i�0 Y ;ems i U . e ' I 4 1 L ► � � i.f �y' � f 4 i r.1.1= Y ♦ _ • ..r - I ! r y x,+{titer i _ { f .i i� ir �. CITY OF RANCHO STAFF REPORT DATE: November 28, 2018 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Candyce Burnett, City Planner 00 INITIATED BY: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSION DRC2018-00816 - GOLDEN AVENUE DEVELOPMENT, INC. - A request to allow for a one (1) year time extension of a previously approved Tentative Tract Map (SUBTT17444) related to a 13-unit condominium development on 2.17 acres of land in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (4 to 8 dwelling units per acre) located on the west side of Archibald Avenue and 150 feet north of Monte Vista Street - APNs: 0202-131-27, -61 and -62. On October 10 2007, a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts was adopted by the Planning Commission for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444. The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects or minor revisions to the projects within the scope of the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of a one (1) year Time Extension DRC2018-00816 through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval. BACKGROUND: On October 10, 2007, the Planning Commission approved Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444 and Design Review DRC2005-00250 for the subdivision and design review of a 2.17-acre parcel of land for the development of 13 detached condominiums. That approval included a related Zoning Map Amendment(DRC2005-00523)to change the Zoning Designation from Medium (M) Residential to Low Medium (LM) Residential, to bring the project site into conformance with the General Plan Land Use Designation. The City Council approved the related Development District Amendment (DRC2005- 00523) on November 7, 2007. The original Tentative Tract Map approval was for three (3) years, which calculates to an expiration date of October 10, 2010; however, through a series of Assembly and Senate Bills, the State legislature granted multiple time extensions for tentative maps throughout the State, which extended the approval of the subject Tentative Tract Map to October 10, 2017. The Planning Commission approved a one (1) year time extension of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17744 on November 8, 2017. The time extension was requested in order to provide time for the City to complete an approved storm drain improvement on 19th Street. The City storm drain system improvements will remove the project site from a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) flood zone and eliminate a current Engineering Department condition of approval requiring the construction of an enlarged on-site storm drain system to capture the existing storm water runoff from the adjacent mobile home park. The City storm drain project was originally scheduled to start in 2018 and has been delayed until 2019. The applicant is requesting a second one(1)year time extension of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444 in order to allow the City time to complete the storm drain improvements on 19th Street, which is scheduled to go out to bid in 2019. EXHIBIT C PLANNING COMMISSION SI^ F REPORT TIME EXTENSION DRC2018-00816—GOLDEN AVENUE DEVELOPMENT, INC. November 28, 2018 Page 2 If the upstream storm drain improvements at 19th Street are not constructed as part of a capital improvement project in 2019 because of unforeseen circumstances, including, but not limited to,funding constraints or other capital improvement delays, the applicant will have two options: 1) pursue final map recordation and construct the necessary storm drain improvements at the westerly edge of property to intercept upstream flows (headwall, catch basin and 54" pipe) and convey these flows to a larger storm drain under Archibald; or 2) apply for third time extension for an additional one (1) year and wait for the City to complete the storm drain project at 19th Street. Per Title 16(Subdivisions) of the City's Municipal Code, Section 16.16.170 permits one-year time extensions not to exceed a total of 5 years. Following this time extension request, if approved, the applicant has the opportunity to request up to 3, one-year time extensions. RELATED FILES: The related Design Review entitlement (DRC2005-00250) was reviewed by the Grading and Technical Review Committees on February 6, 2007 and by the Design Review Committee on July 3, 2007. Approval of the related Design Review DRC2005-00250 was approved by the Planning Commission on October 10, 2007 and expired on October 10, 2012. Subsequently, the applicant submitted a new application for the Design Review of the 13-unit condominiums (DRC2013-00583), which was reviewed by the Design and Technical Review Committees on June 3, 2014 and was approved by the Planning Commission on February 11, 2015. Design Review DRC2013-00583 will expire on February 11, 2020. SITE DESCRIPTION: The project site is located on the west side of Archibald Avenue and north of Monte Vista Street, adjacent to the Chaparral Heights Mobile Home Park. The project site is covered with ornamental grasses and multiple trees and has an open storm drain running through the center of the site. The property is within the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (4 to 8 dwelling units per acre). To the north and west is the Chaparral Heights mobile home park in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (4 to 8 dwelling units per acre); to the east is single-family development in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (4 to 8 dwelling units per acre); and, to the south is single-family development in the Medium (M) Residential District (8 to 14 dwelling units per acre). A. Protect Densitv: 6 dwelling units per acre (4 to 8 dwelling units per acre permitted) Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Vacant Land Low Medium Residential Low Medium (LM) Residential District North Mobile Home Park Low Medium (LM) Low Medium Residential Residential District South Single-Family Residences Medium (M) Residential Medium Residential District East Single-Family Residences Low Medium (LM) Low Medium Residential Residential District West Mobile Home Park Low Medium (LM) Low Medium Residential Residential District PLANNING COMMISSION Sl r%r F REPORT TIME EXTENSION DRC2018-00816—GOLDEN AVENUE DEVELOPMENT, INC. November 28, 2018 Page 3 ANALYSIS: A. Prior Approvals and Automatic Extensions: This Time Extension application is a request to extend the approval period of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444 for one (1) year, which will extend the approval period to October 10, 2019. The original approval of SUBTT17444 was on October 10, 2007, for a time period of three (3) years. The original expiration date was on October 10, 2010. However, subsequent to approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444, the State Legislature passed a series of Assembly/Senate Bills automatically extending the approval period of various active tentative maps throughout the State. State Bill (SB) 1185 extended the approval period one (1) year to October 10, 2011; Assembly Bill (AB) 333 extended the approval period two (2) years to October 10, 2013; Assembly Bill (AB) 208 extended the approval period two (2) years to October 10, 2015; and Assembly Bill (AB) 116 extended the approval period two (2) years to October 10, 2017. The Planning Commission approved a one (1) year time extension for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444 on November 8, 2017, which extended the approval to October 10, 2018. On October 4, 2018, the applicant filed a request for a one (1) year time extension. Tentative Tract Map 17444 Approval History Approval Approval Expiration Approving Authority Approval/Extension Type Period Date Date Planning Commission Original Approval 3 Years 10/10/07 10/10/10 Senate Bill 1185 Automatic Extension 1 Year 10/10/11 Assembly Bill 333 Automatic Extension 2 Years 10/10/13 Assembly Bill 208 Automatic Extension 2 Years 10/10/15 Assembly Bill 116 Automatic Extension 2 Years 10/10/17 Planning Commission Time Extension DRC2017-00755 1 Year 11/08/17 10/10/18 Planning Commission Time Extension DRC2018-00816 1 Year 11/28/18 10/10/19 B. Map Extension: The Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code regulates the subdivision of land through Title 16 of the City's Municipal Code. Chapter 16.16 is applicable specifically to Tentative Maps (Five or More Parcels) and provides for time extension requests through Section 16.16.170 - Extensions. Section 16.16.170.A states: "The subdivider or his representative may request an extension of the expiration date of the approved or conditionally approved tentative map by written application to the community development department. The application shall be filed not less than 60 days prior to the expiration date and shall state the reasons for requesting the extension." The application to extend SUBTT17444 was submitted on October 4, 2018, and includes a letter stating the reasons for requesting the extension (Exhibit C). While the applicant did not meet the 60-day submittal deadline, flexibility in the submittal deadline has been afforded applicants in the past where the map extension request was submitted prior to the entitlement expiration date and could be brought before the Planning Commission in a timely manner. C. Conformance with Development Code: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444 was designed to meet or exceed all development standards applicable to subdivisions in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District. Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444 is for the subdivision of air space for condominium purposes for the future sale of the 13 units approved for the project site. The subdivision remains in conformance with development standards for the Low Medium (LM) Residential District for multi-family developments. PLANNING COMMISSION Si:-,FF REPORT 0 TIME EXTENSION DRC2018-00816—GOLDEN AVENUE DEVELOPMENT, INC. November 28, 2018 Page 4 D. Public Art: This subject Tentative Map Time Extension is exempt from providing public art as outlined in Chapter 17.124 of the Development Code as the project was approved prior to the approval of Ordinance No. 912 on July 19, 2017. E. Environmental Assessment: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration on October 10, 2007, in connection with the City's approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project unless: (i) substantial changes are proposed to the project that indicate new or more severe impacts on the environment; (ii) substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the project was previously reviewed that indicate new or more severe environmental impacts; or(iii) new important information shows the project will have new or more severe impacts than previously considered; or (iv) additional mitigation measures are now feasible to reduce impacts or different mitigation measures can be imposed to substantially reduce impacts. Staff has evaluated Time Extension DRC2018-00816 and concludes that substantial changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project have not occurred which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. In June of 2017, a biological resource update letter was submitted as part of the request for the previous one (1) year time extension request. The June 2017 letter states that no native habitat types occur on site and no federally listed species were observed or are expected to occur on the project site due to lack of suitable native habitats, level of disturbance that has occurred to the site, and development of surrounding lands. No direct or indirect impact to federal listed species are anticipated from the project or the related Tentative Map Time Extension. The application is for a one (1) year time extension of a previously approved tentative tract map with no proposed changes to the scope of the original approval. Staff further finds that the project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration, not have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less than significant. Therefore, pursuant to CEQA, staff recommends that the Planning Commission concur with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is required in connection with the City's consideration of Time Extension DRC2018-00816. FISCAL IMPACT: The project site currently is assessed an annual property tax. A percentage of this annual tax is shared with the City. The proposed development will increase the value of the project site and the City's annual share of the property tax will increase accordingly. The project proponent will also be responsible for paying one-time impact fees. These fees are intended to address the increased demand for City services due to the proposed project. The following types of services that these impact fees would support include the following: library services, transportation infrastructure, drainage infrastructure, animal services, police, parks, and community and recreation services. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: Although a specific current City Council goal does not apply to this application, the proposed map extension for 13 unit condominium projects will enhance the 2018 City Council's goal of enhancing premier community status by providing an opportunity for market rate for-sale housing product on a 2.17 acre infill parcel. With the time extension, the site retains the entitlement to construct for-sale condominiums that will provide a transition of density and appropriate scale of residential development from the single-family dwelling units to the south to the mobile home park located to the north and west. PLANNING COMMISSION S ,FF REPORT 0 TIME EXTENSION DRC2018-00816 —GOLDEN AVENUE DEVELOPMENT, INC. November 28, 2018 Page 5 Lastly, the time extension request is consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan and the objectives of the Development Code which will facilitate the development of the subject property with residential uses consistent with the General Plan and Zoning Map. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing with a regular page legal advertisement in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. No correspondence has been received related to the project or the notifications. EXHIBITS: Exhibit A Time Extension Request Letter Dated October 8, 2018 Exhibit B Time Extension DRC2017-00755 Planning Commission Staff Report Dated November 8, 2017 (with Exhibits including the original Staff Report with Exhibits and Resolution of Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444 Dated October 10, 2007) Draft Resolution of Approval for Time Extension DRC2018-00816 0 Tentative Tract Map Extension Request Letter Golden Avenue Development, Inc 10 Elk Grove Ln. Laguna Niguel,CA 92677 October 8,2018 Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Dr. Rancho Cucamonga,CA 91730 To whom it may concern, The intention of this letter is that we want to extend the Tentative Tract Map for Tract 17444 project. We want to extend the Tentative Tract Map for another 12 months, because we are still waiting for the City's storm drain construction. The project of Tract 17444 is located on 6910 Archibald Ave.Rancho Cucamonga, CA. It consists of 13 unit detached dwellings. Last year,we were notified by the Engineering Department that the City would have a big storm drain project on 19"Street in 2018 spring.The new storm drain system will collect all the water flows from 210 Freeway and discharge to the existing storm drain system.Thus,the 54" RCP underneath our property will become useless. In order to discuss the detail of this storm drain issue,we held a meeting with Albert Espinoza and Romeo David.The Engineering Department officials gave us a suggestion that we could start our project following to the City storm drain project.According to the Engineering official,there will be no surface water discharging to our property, after the City's storm drain on 191h Street is constructed. If we start the construction this year,the 54"RCP inside our property will be abandoned in the future, and it leads to waste of resources.Therefore,we wanted to follow the City's engineer suggestion,and postponed our project starting date. However,according to the Engineering Department's recent update,the starting date of the City's Storm drain was delayed to 2019 spring due to the design issue.Thus,we have to postpone our project starting date as well.As the project developer,we sincerely request a Tentative Tract Map extension for our project so that we can start the construction in 2019. Sincerely, Golden Avenue Development, Inc. EXHIBIT A 0 0 CITY . RANCHO , ; 1 , STAFF REPORT DATE: November 8, 2017 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Candyce Burnett, City Planner INITIATED BY: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSION DRC2017-00755- GOLDEN AVENUE DEVELOPMENT, INC. - A request to allow for a one (1) year time extension of a previously approved Tentative Tract Map (SUBTT17444) related to a 13-unit condominium development on 2.17 acres of land in the Low Medium (LM) District (4 to 8 dwelling units per acre) located on the west side of Archibald Avenue and 150 feet north of Monte Vista Street - APN' 0202-131-27, 61 and 62. On October 10 2007, a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts was adopted by the Planning Commission for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444. The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects or minor revisions to the projects within the scope of the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of a one (1) year Time Extension DRC2017- 00755, through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval. BACKGROUND: The applicant is seeking a one (1) year time extension to a previously approved tentative tract map (SUBTT17444) in order to allow the City to complete storm drain improvements on 19th Street. Storm water from 19th Street currently flows through the adjacent mobile home park and across the project site to an inlet on Archibald Avenue. The storm drain system improvements will eliminate the need for a current Engineering Department condition of approval requiring the construction of an enlarged on-site storm drain system to capture the existing storm water runoff from the adjacent mobile home park. The City storm drain project is scheduled to commence in early 2018. On October 10, 2007, the Planning Commission approved Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444 and Design Review DRC2005-00250 for the subdivision and design review of a 2.17-acre parcel of land for condominium purposes for the development of 13 condominiums. That approval included a related Development District Amendment (DRC2005-00523), to change the Development District Map from Medium Residential to Low Medium Residential, to bring the site into conformance with the General Plan land use designation. The Design Review and the related subdivision were reviewed by the Grading and Technical Review Committees on February 6, 2007 and by the Design Review Committee on July 3, 2007. The City Council approved the related Development District Amendment (DRC2005- 00523) on November 7, 2007. Approval of Development Review DRC2005-00250 expired on October 10, 2012. Subsequently, the applicant submitted a new application for the design review of the 13 units (DRC2013-00583), which was reviewed by the Design and Technical Review Committees on June 3, 2014 and approved by the EXHIBIT B 0 0 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TIME EXTENSION DRC2017-00755—GOLDEN AVENUE DEVELOPMENT, INC. November 8, 2017 Page 2 Planning Commission on February 11, 2015. Design Review approval of DRC2013-00583 will expire on February 11, 2020, SITE DESCRIPTION: The project site is located on the west side of Archibald Avenue and north of Monte Vista Street, adjacent to the Chaparral Heights Mobile Home Park. The project site is covered with ornamental grasses and multiple trees and has an open storm drain running through the center of the site. The property is within the Low Medium (LM) District (4 to 8 dwelling units per acre). To the north and west is the Chaparral Heights mobile home park in the Low Medium (LM) District (4 to 8 dwelling units per acre); to the east is single-family development in the Low Medium District (4 to 8 dwelling units per acre); and, to the south is single-family development in the Medium (M) District (8 to 14 dwelling units per acre), A. Project Density: 6 dwelling units per acre (4 to 8 dwelling units per acre permitted) !wand Use General Plan Zoning Site Vacant Land Low Medium Low Medium (LM) North Mobile Home Park Low Medium Low Medium (LM) South Single-Family Residences Medium Medium (M) East Single-Family Residences Low Medium Low Medium (LM) West Mobile Home Park Low Medium Low Medium (LM) ANALYSIS: A. Prior Approvals and Automatic Extensions- This time extension application is a request to extend the approval period of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444 for one (1) year. The original approval of SUBTT17444 was on October 10, 2007, for a time period of three (3) years. The original expiration date was on October 10, 2010. However, subsequent to approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444, the State Legislature passed a series of Assembly/Senate Bills automatically extending the approval period of various active tentative maps throughout the State. State Bill (SB) 1185 extended the approval period 1-year to October 10, 2011; Assembly Bill (AB) 333 extended the approval period 2-years to October 10, 2013; Assembly Bill (AB) 208 extended the approval period 2-years to October 10, 2015; and, Assembly Bill (AB) 116 extended the approval period 2-years to October 10, 2017. Tentative Tract Map 17444 Approval Approval Expiration Approving Authority Approval/Extension Type Period Date Date Planning Commission Original Approval 3 Years 10/10/07 10/10/10 Senate Bill 1185 Automatic Extension 1 Year 10/10/11 Assembly Bill 333 Automatic Extension 2 Years 10/10/13 Assembly Bill 208 Automatic Extension 2 Years 10/10/15 Assembly Bill 116 Automatic Extension 2 Years 10/10/17 Planning Commission Time Extension DRC2017-00755 1 Year 10/10/18 0 0 PLANNING COMMISSION S ;F REPORT TIME EXTENSION DRC2017-00755— GOLDEN AVENUE DEVELOPMENT, INC. November 8, 2017 Page 3 B. Map Extension.- The Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code regulates the subdivision of land through Title 16, the City's Subdivision Ordinance_ Section 16.16 is applicable specifically to Tentative Maps (Five or More Parcels)--and provides for time extension requests through Section 16.16.170 Extensions. Section 16.16.170.A. states: "The subdivider or his representative may request an extension of the expiration date of the approved or conditionally approved tentative map by written application to the community development department. The application shall be filed not less than 60 days prior to the expiration date and shall state the reasons for requesting the extension." The application to extend SUBTT17444 was submitted on September 19, 2017, and includes a letter stating the reasons for requesting the extension (Exhibit C), While the applicant did not meet the 60 day submittal deadline, flexibility in the submittal deadline has been afforded applicants in the past where the map extension request was submitted prior to the entitlement expiration date and could be brought before the Planning Commission in a timely manner. C. Conformance with Development Code: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444 was designed to meet or exceed all development standards applicable to subdivisions in the Low Medium (LM) District. Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444 is for the subdivision of air space for condominium purposes for the future sale of the 13 units approved for the project site_ The subdivision remains in conformance with Development standards for the Low Medium (LM) District for multi-family developments. D. Biological Survey Update: A biological resource update letter (Recon; June 7, 2017) was submitted as part of the request for the time extension. The letter verifies that no native habitat types occur on-site and no federally listed species were observed or are expected to occur on the project site due to lack of suitable native habitats, level of disturbance that has occurred to the site and development of surrounding lands. No direct or indirect impact to federal listed species are anticipated from the project or the related tentative map time extension. E. Environmental Assessment: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (`CEQK) and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration on October 10, 2007 in connection with the City's approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project unless: (i) substantial changes are proposed to the project that indicate new or more severe impacts on the environment; (ii) substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the project was previously reviewed that indicate new or more severe environmental impacts; or (iii) new important information shows the project will have new or more severe impacts than previously considered; or(iv) additional mitigation measures are now feasible to reduce impacts or different mitigation measures can be imposed to substantially reduce impacts. Staff has evaluated Time Extension DRC2017-00755 and concludes that substantial changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project have not occurred which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. The biological resource update letter dated June 7, 2017, concludes that no direct or indirect impact to federal listed species are anticipated from the project or the related tentative map time extension. The application is for a one (1) year time extension of a previously approved tentative tract map with no proposed changes to the scope of the original approval. Staff further finds that the project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration, not have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different 1 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TIME EXTENSION DRC2017-00755—GOLDEN AVENUE DEVELOPMENT, INC. November 8, 2017 Page 4 mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less than significant. Therefore, pursuant to CEQA, staff recommends that the Planning Commission concur with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is required in connection with the City's consideration of Time Extension DRC2017-00755. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. No correspondence has been received related to the project or the notifications. EXHIBITS: Exhibit A - Aerial Photo Exhibit B - Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444 Exhibit C - Time Extension Request Letter Dated September 14, 2017 Exhibit D - Biological Resources Update Letter Dated June 7, 2017 Exhibit E - Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444 Planning Commission Staff Report dated October 10, 2007 (with Exhibits) Exhibit F - Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. 07-59 for SUBTT17444 Draft Resolution of Approval for Time Extension DRC2017-00755 CBITVIIs all wi 4'.�+y �" *i- ,.a�J'yta�.{ •+ .xT, O �:n w , -?� +:i. �+,,.,.,,, 76 �f�r�•�� -!; _ .F - JQ uaz]f.l1L'� j N ls@AA • fit ' F V-F ;� r� t # ter'' �i r9 q, k�! 4 elst ram► �- � r yi 4�^�E }J r �„ •r�,1.,'('� ,,�;,, '�i f a'r - a� {Q. s, ���, j] �., _ �' ? t i' 't+ * ► � ` ',, �Se�sEn a;�io;nj �ri;S elsi� alt�oVijti..w. , l f� aJuoNj �{ CL of Jig do I ji�j III Id, rl cl P 4muff.. w, cn r_ 5 �.'' t• a • _ 'r;S1t • I i+� � • ai z. �; A'^ Fa _ , a��elsiA'....�{,»� •y.i E Y • IS e1jolol •` ` ' �" (. xr r v ir i �Q efE�11eVW; '' 21JaEs fly. c rJ�a. , L'v, R.a:ati. •Y , •�4s Lei n rr - r.. .s-'!'K i;} J y" 1 � iS,UOIeA.�/ .._ . �..... �ijed 3L-pgll�!ggW� ' � � �'�r i ,•: �4 � �, ' ;�_ 'Q 51� �aEa; Tje'aaec:ei�� o ' Q ; r i�tiP i 3 _ _ ' 'mw'. 'Le I� O1� ,r. -sue r O -L2 _ . r. *y 1S AIIaM - _ #` #� .- yl� a ' 'IS allaE;6 uoiW _ Vuim a, ,�' fh i f �E r �3'►�s Rr rti4.;' P �i E u Is auauou6EW � M �� �►� Eti� a �rrr ru rmrsfa+xaur ranArr rrAM C D A ���•:.�•� MOUNTAIN VIEW ESTATES 19k F.iF.�f[r.UA rA 1. +:.•>'rsr 1r P. �- ""'" •�� ,�� 6910 6946 ARCHIBALD AVE. RANCHO CUCA MONGA, CA 9170? Mll,ra[Ma , �,�a.�1�• • tes ..,[r.r.... ,r r,.r,•.fr[,.rr.wes Ii:w�io'."� •��-�••• '� APHk 202-131.61;2172-131-62;242-131 27 (FILE p URC 2045^00250 r 2,rif rq,[r[ [}[•(I• 1•w f•.. IPIM���wl••y J ' 1 r i L- � arc tan.w.�. [r.c w•.•..t v --� O cow-„Y[M ,mnSr.IRRK KIWI' ]r Y ^tA•tr f[p�f Ib �- •.c wa.rr,aln m...w.r..1f r.a.l I — - ..«. • a•W[II r�.c 1{Ir {`( H17Vwrtrr Corp .w..a•ww ri i..Ifenaa a ti Ix,I K \ !rl -..� {� .. —J I i_ - - - � - - --- ... - -- - - --- - - - � v.rr fw lwI rtOa-,a,Y •I.rc rw.r.ra,. I ARCL111 ALU AI'�Y t.rr,.f![Y�1Vr Wn rf•� .L it - � - �T - - - - - - - - - � �- VOi w� �- ut,v t \ ORCltivititl}SOJ ,fn un[rra ar wav � — .lo.[v rail i ,N.v u11; 1�Ar Z �1 t f irif -_yr •1 W fry[BRIM ra.i rw � j �—� �._ •In.l t ••R[v aarK,w[Rr1 1 1 lm r1. �I � Yn� .rn'•j � •ty�,� ,/til[•r[fcw[i. - �~ - Uzi j — — ❑ YHr.♦�,�Ywrr••r uv fff prq.[t ort./ n.nr.,w`r•,•c wr III���''''''''' llf tlfil�C[fl lll f7 [. •p will[,hIw __ I 1 r ?'Ak r l El !TE `y hi- Vl�lxllrruu,wo�r^ AS-lot Tentative Tract Map Extension Request Letter Golden Avenue Development, Inc 10 Elk Grove Ln. Laguna Niguel,CA 92677 September 14, 2017 Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Dr. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 To whom it may concern, The intention of this letter is that we want to extend the Tentative Tract Map for Tract 17444 project. We want to extend the Tentative Tract Map for 16 months, because we are still working on the final map process. The project of Tract 17444 is located on 6910 Archibald Ave. Rancho Cucamonga,CA. It consists of 13 unit detached dwellings. Due to the elevation, all the water flows coming from 210 Freeway drains through our property and discharge to the City's storm drain on Archibald. Because of the huge amount of water flow,we originally proposed to construct a 54" Reinforced Concrete Pipe collecting the surface flows from our neighbor,Chaparral Height Mobile Home Park, and discharge to the City's storm drain system. We submitted our plan sets to the City last year,and our house plans were approved by the Building Department in mid-2016.At the end of 2016,our plan checker from the Engineering Department,Willie Valbuena, retired.As a result, our plans were held by the Engineering Department for a couple months.Therefore,we requested an extension for our plan check process from the Building Department, and the City granted us a one-year extension. Recently, we were notified by the Engineering Department that the City will have a big storm drain project on 19`"Street in 2018 spring.The new storm drain system will collect all the water flows from 210 Freeway and discharge to the existing storm drain system.Thus, the 54" RCP underneath our property will become useless. In order to discuss the detail of this storm drain issue, we held a meeting with Albert Espinoza and Romeo David.The Engineering Department officials gave us a suggestion that we could start our project in September 2018, once the City storm drain is completed.According to the Engineering official, there will be no surface water discharging to our property, after the City's storm drain on 19`"Street is constructed. If we start the construction this year, the 54" RCP inside our property will be abandoned in the future, and it leads to waste of resources.Therefore,we want to follow the City's engineer suggestion, and postpone our project starting date.As the project developer,we sincerely request a Tentative Tract Map extension for our project so that we can start the construction in September 2018. Sincerely, Golden Avenue Development, Inc. ���pLAIr317� f"', �O 1�Iel1-1 RECON An Employee-Owned Company June 7,2017 Mr.Ye Liu Golden Avenue Development,Inc. 10 Ell-Grove Lane Laguna Niguel, CA 92677 Reference Federal Emergency Management Agency Letter for Mountain View Estates: Required Background Information for Issuance of CLOMR-F(RECON Number 8777) Dear Mr. Liu: This letter provides the background information needed by Federal Emergency Management Agency(FEMA- )to make a"no take"determination as part of the Conditional Letter of Map Revision(CLOMR-F)fcr the'Mountain View Estates project.The project applicant is proposing to alter a portion of the current FE\,%.•delineated 100- year flcndplain. Information contained in thu letter demonstrates how the Mountain%riew Estates project would not affect any listed species covered under the federal Endangered Species Act. The 2.6-acre project site is located in the city of Rancho Cucamonga approximately S miles north of Interstate 10 and S miles west of Interstate 15(Figure 1). Specifically, the site occurs to the west of Archibald Avenue, north of Monte Vista Street, and east of East Street(Figure 2).The project site includes Assessor's Parcel Numbers 0202- 131-27,0202-131.61,and 0202-131-62 Biological Resource Evaluation Methods FILAR.Associates Environmental and Acoustical Consorting biologists conducted a general biological survey on the project site in June 2005.The biological resource survey identified one]and cover type on the site: `Landscaped and Exotic". No native habitat types occur on-site. Federal listed species with the potential to occur on-s;te were evaluated based on habitat present on the project site.The information provided on habitat was used to make determinations on the likelihood of any federal listed species to be directly or indirectly affected by the project.A search of the Cahforzria Natural Diversity Database was conducted to find known observations of federal listed species either on the project site or in its vicinity (Attachment 1).The potential for these listed species to occur on the project site was then further evaluated using the information on habitat preferences and ecological conditions preferred by each species. No federal listed species were observed or are expected to occur on the project site due to the lack of any suitable native habitats,level of disturbance that has occurred to the site,and development of surrounding lands.No direct or indirect impacts to federal listed species are anticipated from the project.There is no critical habitat for any federal listed species designated on the project site Effects on Federal Listed Species Federal listed plant and wildlife species with the potential for occurrence on the Mountain View Estates project site were evaluated for presencelabsence and for any anticipated direct or indirect impacts on these species. The project site lacks suitable habitat for any of the listed species with the potential for occurrence on-site.Therefore, no direct or indirect impacts to any federal listed species are anticipated from the project. Sincerely, 1 l S13icemy logist GAS-eab EXHIBIT 1927 Fifth Avenue San ;ego,CA 92101 1 619 305 9333 recwnenviro-imental rom SAN D!EGO ' CENTRAL COAST , BERKELEY I TUCSON ATTACHMENT 1 Federal Limted Species with the Potential for Occurrence coil tile.11(iulitain Vie%v E.-Itate.4 llmjouct Siw Sltecief Srirntific Name StntelFedernl Ilnbitatt)Prefere.ncefRequrrementsl $nests for Determination of Ckcurrnnce Common Name Status Bb,ominu Period Potential _ PI.ANT SPECIES P{rLYGONACLAE I1utlh'%VIIEAT FAMILY — — Slender•hornt,d.pinrllnn'er FF`, Chaparral-nlluvi;ll fan scrub Old+;tndv henrhvs for Tht-specw.;has a lute putanh:t!fot• Urtdemlictrra h phu r r 6 f7uod111.6n re natt• bt•1uLv_'_00 ft.vt urE urrrnre•un•sttt,du,•to the lack of — .� _ _ __ nlga•uptintt•habitnt WILDLIFE S'PECIES INN'F.ltTEBRATES 11YuroAF Ilt,lht Sntnl=Etna{C•luL"Im,flc Fl. I)k Iht tn'!.bum tttun inland dung- This p1•rit,.:ha.ah.1.n 1u�1 hute•ntiul foe Ilarrplrr ntrrlu,1+r'rur;rr}.'y (nt urrenrt,un•o4.ItP klut•to the Link of ;rl4lomtural+t ' appltitprinre�nnd} a+ik rind IPLPI of p.t4t t ch.,t urbanvv. AM l'HIBL%Nti Bt;FONID.X£ TItuE TOADS :1rtu�'u tuad �T — FF (Ipt•n�trrctmsi�le:nnrl gr:nf•1 f1:1(s.fltttet.-hallm Tht-spec it,,ha:a Intl [:PtPnli.d f tt ankanrrrd rulr/nre,tr I N pouly ralun,,1tL•k am care,fort,bive3ing habitat (x•r'urrenre an•sitt,clue to th.•lark+if Nwrurn.tl t,x.F pt 411,11 Lnt:hr,'e;lin_--a4nn apprulrruut,etrt•.knL h:Lhtt,lt f�l:trrh--}kdsl TRUE FRO(; \i++untain vkdlotvIeetta t11,F FE Pert,nni,tl imckv strt',tm k,nu:e•�,;tE�tt t rathrnt This spvvie hn.,it low putenttal ha• Minot rrursrr+su rhr.11711.rivers, urrurronrt,un•.,tte due to tht lnt k of _: Pt'411ri:1te itr'earn habttM BIRDS SYIXIID.%E G.N,%TCATNJERS 1'tm..tal Califurni'a F`I 1'ktostnl tat:P F+'ru}F,ntariti Zm,IPnt ;VkvI? Thi, Ia'rie:has a ktW Itlrtentitd 1:er r;nuta•ntcher Itt-Ment ucrurrent'e rtit•Fitt,elue to thf'lark of Puhup111a ralrfornre'u ,tppruprulte hobtant rulr arnica \l'+unnun Vte•a Est_tty';1 t•uj+ i Page I Federal Listed Spuvjc,,With the Potential ror Occurrence un the N14.1untain View Fstatu-4 Project Site Species'Sci¢ntific Name StnMFedernl Hitbitat/PreferctncelR ant;equirem ! 1:3asis for Dt=terminetion of Om.urmnee Common 3+atmr Status i Bloomine Period Potential dl_WI►IAI.S YHETE RONTYID�E Y�1'u('Kt.T MICE&11,VNGARtur RATS _ San Bernardino jinn FE j Open-4tub vegetation lroaat:d sere scrub, fhi-spevit s has it low potential for hnngarnn rut f chap:uTnl,desert)in z;anelr loam substrates of ocrw crave nn-site due ro the tick cif 1)1 r,n(lPltl t'8 T—P ltl1 prn rue _ ;_alluvial fimn and flwdpbtin__ uv n•iute�hubirau_ .�-_-- FE = F«dvrallr listed anclungert•d FT = Fede:sdl%'lietetl i lit ell tenvil \la,untnin View E.tatea Prtpjt�ct Pier 4 _ Hesperia r- .n c+ c �.�. •, rem wrightwood ( F North Q' Lytl° T73� a Syrr c� 8emarrirrro NF 4 Silverwood G Lake L O S A N G E L E S S A N COUNTY B E R N A R D I N 0 tix� San Gabriel C O U N T Y Reservoir Morris Reservoir San r} �e ardino l a # a$ 4k n ArlloruD Glendora Angeles Haights #n#'�lusco Claremont t 4 Azusa La n Upland Rancho veme camonga Fontana "`�Rialta i a Chart�­ }' a Oak Covina Dim . Wn a f „ n Cov'in"a mona-".--Montclai � �#_{: - BloomingtonCJi ton Walnut f Ontario :k land .Indust f ; 60 sunnyslupe errace �5 Di and liar , Chino q soar springs ,* Rudidoux C- Mountain a P+ Mrra Lorna e 4 , Reserve l Santt[Ana Pedley r so � River Reg Park s ` Chino bills Y' _ KERN r LOS ANGEIES Prado Flood - ENTbRA Control 1 Basin _. 21 tL inda R I V E R S I D E woodcrest f`ORA GE RSIDE `�' ` ' Corona. Gardens C O U N T Y 4 �SAN� IEG theveland NF Lake Mathews 0 Mi1es 5 Project Location FIGURE 1 EC "ON V Regional Location h1U06S5197?7%=mm0n"9a,5g1 mrd $:':2017 sab - . | � . � I ORI 7 I � � . ! ) y HUN2NGT O OR . � • � - � . ; • . � .� . ,�� � \ . :: _ � �• � ■.�■ , � w UNNAMED RD �w f � } - . y �9 �- c .� ~ - . . � I JOLLADR * _ k . JOA t` � . , • . ' . . ; . . . ■ ' , ' ■ . ■ ■ � . ' ■ ■| . . T H E C I T Y Q F 0A ` C110 CLCA ,%10INCA CC St� uReport DATE: October 10, 2007 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: James R. Troyer, AICP, Planning Director BY: Table van der Zwaag, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT - DRC2005-00523 — CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES - A request to change the Development District Map from Medium Residential to Low- Medium Residential to bring the site into conformance with the General Plan, located on the west side of Archibald Avenue and 150 feet north of Monte Vista Street - APN: 0202-131-27, 0202-131-61 and 62. Related files: Development Review DRC2005-00250,M nor Exception DRC2005-00522,Tree Removal Permit DRC2005-00521 and Preliminary Review DRC2004-00331. This action will be forwarded to the City Council for final action and the date of the public hearing before City Council will be separately noticed. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT17444 —CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES -A request to subdivide 2.17 acres for the purpose of creating a 13 unit condominium development in the Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre). However, a Development District Amendment has also been submitted that would amend the designation to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre). The project is located on the west side of Archibald Avenue and 150 feet north of Monte Vista Street-APN: 0202-131-27, 61 and 62. Related Files: Development Review DRC2005-0250, Development District Amendment DRC2005-00523, Minor Exception DRC2005-00522, Tree Removal Permit DRC2005-00521 and Preliminary Review DRC2004-00331. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2005-00250 - CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES - A request to develop a 13 unit detached condominium project on 2.17 in the Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre). However,a Development District Amendment has also been submitted that would amend the designation to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre). The project is located on the west side of Archibald Avenue and 150 feet north of Monte Vista Street-APN: 0202-131-27, 61, and 62. Related Files: Tentative Tract Map 17444, Development District Amendment DRC2005-00523, Minor Exception DRC2005-00522,Tree Removal Permit DRC2005-00521 and Preliminary Review DRC2004-00331. EXHIBIT E r dflvi 0 0 s PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2005-00523/SUBTT17444/DRC2005-00250—CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES October 10, 2007 Page 2 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Project Density: 6 dwelling units per acre B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Mobile Home Park/ Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) South - Single-Family Residential/Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) East - Multi-Family Residential/Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) West - Mobile Home Park/ Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) C. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Low-Medium Residential (4-B dwelling units per acre) North - Low Residential (2-4) dwelling units per acre) South - Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) East - Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) West - Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) D. Site Characteristics: The 2.17 acre site is comprised of three parcels and slopes gently to the southeast. The site will share access with the mobile home park that borders the site to the north and west. The site contains 45 trees of various species and the remnants of a stone-lined drainage channel. The mobile home park has an open storm drain which currently surface drains across the site and enters the public storm drain system at the southern property line of the site. ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicant proposes constructing 13 detached condominiums on 2.17 acres of vacant land. The proposed density is 6 dwelling units per acre which is in the middle of the Low-Medium Residential range of 4-8 dwelling units per acre. The project consists of three floor plans ranging in size from 1,705 to 2,113 square feet. Models A and B are two-story units with two elevations per floor plan; Model C is a single-story unit. The site will share ingress and egress with the mobile home park that abuts the project to the north and west. A new traffic signal will be constructed to aide access to both the project site and to the mobile home park. The project was designed to conform to the development requirements outlined in the Development Code for the Low-Medium Residential District. The Development Code does not give specific development criteria for condominium projects within the Low-Medium Residential District. This in turn, makes it difficult for the project to meet the setback requirements that are measured from the property lines when a condominium project, by its nature, does not have internal property lines. To overcome the issue, the applicant was directed by staff to meet the intent of the Development Code. This was accomplished by the project meeting the required side and rear setback as measured from the 6-foot high block walls surrounding the private yard areas of each unit. The overall project meets the front yard setback from Archibald Avenue. To overcome the reduced front yard setback for the individual units, the applicant was required to double the required on-site guest parking spaces. Each unit also includes two private enclosed parking spaces. The project exceeds 0 0 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2005-00523/SUBTT17444/DRC2005-00250—CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES October 10, 2007 Page 3 the Private,Common and Usable Open Space area requirements. The project also includes a large open grass play area, a tot lot and barbecue facilities to meet the Recreation Facility requirement. B. Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444: Concurrent with the Development Review application is Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444. The tract map proposes the subdivision of air space for residential condominium purposes, which will allow individual ownership of the homes and common ownership of the open space, parking, driveways, and landscaped areas. C. Development District Amendment DRC2005-00523: The General Plan land use designation for the subject site is Low-Medium Residential. The Development District Map designation for the site is Medium Residential. The app<Jcant has requested that the site be developed under the Low-Medium zoning designation. In order to bring the Development District Map into conformance with the General Plan, the applicant has applied for a Development District Amendment. This change will give the site the same Development District designation as the mobile home park which the site shares ingress and egress and abuts on two sides. D. Minor Exception DRC2005-00522: The project includes an application for a Minor Exception to allow a 7-foot high perimeter wall along Archibald Avenue. The project site is within an area of noise levels exceeding City standards according to General Plan Exhibit V-13. An acoustical analysis of the project site was completed and concluded that with a 7-foot high perimeter wall along Archibald Avenue, the project would comply with the City's exterior residential noise standards of 60 dBA. The Planning Director will consider the approval of the Minor Exception following the Planning Commission's action on the related project applications. E. Tree Removal Permit DRC2005-00521: The applicant has submitted a request to remove 45 trees in order to accommodate the development of the site. An Arborist Report was prepared on May 17, 2005 which surveyed the site and found a total of 45 trees that qualify as Heritage Trees under the City's Tree Preservation Ordinance. Of those trees, all but 6 trees have been recommended for removal because of their poor condition. The report recommends preserving 6 trees if they can be incorporated into the landscape design for the project. The Development Code requires that new developments plant 40 trees per acre of which 90-percent must be 15-gallon size trees and 10-percent must be 24-inch box size trees. To overcome the removal of the majority of mature trees on the site,the applicant will be required to plant 100 percent 24-inch box size trees to meet the Development Code tree planting requirement. F. Design Review Committee: The project was reviewed by the Design Review Committee (McPhail, Stewart, Diaz)on February 6,2007. At the meeting,the Committee members were concerned about insufficient guest parking and the aspects of the design of the homes. The applicant redesigned the project and the Committee reviewed the revised plans on July 3, 2007. Staff presented the revised drawings which satisfied all issues identified by the Committee (Munoz, Stewart, Diaz) at which time they recommended approval. G. GradinQ Review Committee: The project was reviewed by the Grading Committee on February 6, 2007, and the preliminary Grading Plan for the project was conceptually approved. i 0 0 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2005-00523'SUBTT17444/DRC2005-00250—CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES October 10, 2007 Page 4 H. Technical Review Committee: The Technical Review Committee reviewed the project on January 6,2007. The Committee recommended approval of the project subject to conditions contained in the attached Resolutions of Approval. f, Environmental Assessment: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures related to air quality, biological resources, geology and soils, hydrology and water quality and noise, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter,the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. A Mitigation Monitoring Program has also been prepared to ensure implementation of, and compliance with, the mitigation measures for the project. NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING: The applicant held a neighborhood meeting on August 11,2006,to discuss the proposed project. Property owners within 300 feet were notified of the meeting and approximately 53 neighbors attended. Those in attendance did not raise any issues regarding the project and a number stated that they fe't that the project would be a positive addition to the neighborhood. CORRESPONDENCE; This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Dail Bulletin newspaper,the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. Staff required the applicant to post a large 4-foot by 8-foot Notice of Filing sign on the property, which was also used to post the City's public hearing notice. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444, Development Review DRC2005-00250, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2005- 00521 through the adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval with conditions and issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration. Staff further recommends the approval of Development District Amendment DRC2005-00523 to be forwarded to the City Council for final action. Respectfully submitted, �- 1, Jam s R. Troyer, AICP Planning Director JT:TV/ge PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2005-00523/SUBTT17444'DRC2005-00250-CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES October 10, 2007 Page 5 Attachments: Exhibit A - Site Utilization Map Exhibit 8 Site Plan Exhibit C - Conceptual Grading Plan Exhibit D - Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444 Exhibit E - Conceptual Landscape Plan Exhibit F - Building Elevations Exhibit G - Floor Plans Exhibit H - Design Review Comm=ttee Action Agendas dated February 6 and July 3, 2007 Exhibit I - Initial Study Parts I and II Draft Resolution of Approvai for Development District Amendment DRC2005-00523 Draft Ordinance for Development District Amendment DRC2005-00523 Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17222 Draft Resolution of Approval for Development Review DRC2005-00250 --um MOUNTAIN VIEW ESTATES C- ° 'A 6910, 6946 ARCHIBALD AVE. -.....• U\ RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91701 APNN 202-131.61;202-131-62;202-131-27 (FILE A ORC 2005-00250 ` Y '��; — At►elA W EFAIA Y Lat. .�r - ® •••. p 1 ) {Y. o - Li—col, 2 4 Y l `, - � �C���� rltlbnl• .rNta[ i���.'�"�.,., }' / Cl' ••-ter r r x `.may' /y *w Y y 1(v ♦ / �Y " y. A V actbl11tia 1.R IT uNC7vaSuo77N y V +,Y` 1 Y ✓ rY r YY,.}Y\ \V�� �frrr'r S'r.�.� '�l Y _� / .�<//'t} /Y YY / J \ }r?' •T i y` y ti" ��r r r Lry�YyY�,.Y `4.�r vtiw Cix { 1 v e �1�a Y Y '✓�Y TI•;Y�Y`Y VYVf Y K�N r yv• �1 I •Yiy f' x.`/ / _ I I � NYNTIN6iON \, ..� I •••�11..r"'YYY '4 �OUiN bL[M O0.1T[ '� 11�� . /� � /�. lI Y � �^ kK tr k y�Y Y Yv�I : Y f•'V~y`" r} Y V Y Y �,C(� r/ - / / '..;E EI U10EY [ I V YY V V •r..�rw ?t Y �" _ /yam •- / Y ti 1 I ( ti •YY �S s r S X :�. x. �u .'.ro[ tr wr. a:w+ FA ru ' / �F �k n � " .s.w on.va[.cR•aw w M I SMO E[ 1A Y ft16E .e .uV x. ` •.MF MaOi MI t.Tll..rbn •.rp i[ Y}K rwT tl r[v[ •TM i1 lwby h1'1 it N[w Tnl �._ r '} ^°- �� I(�' n rf �R ����f � 1 1. _ 4..' 1 L C1 r� K rr K LA Eat F' en1v - ^•� l v .1�AWpw%r[hr .... ',( (( Y rj ..e..a sn.TnYVA•mn 1 ❑ k .< x / l per r..w•.. ..... . ... J t x . Y X�f O o CAMDEN STREET o —/ �YlxK f> x. x� Lam- . `! KKl'SCvti\;CKr�,��` v k' r f��(,, `� •r�(S� ti r�v 'r? ~v•tiv C '{.� ( i A AS-JO1 � ` 1r1'=-f. flUIS IPeICitlfe PppJCCI ICnn ,- C _ D A MOUNTAIN VIEW ESTATES ,Till.11-'.{ Ililn ".�i•wl'r '•^RA:• R� .q. Kr. 1lYr»rt... Si•" rw�,rK dMn.;Nr 6910, 6946 ARCHISALD AVE. _ --�'••• ]wr].>.rla...•r.,.] ;,_�z�.°:�,�n,�. RANCHO CUCAMONGA1 CA 91701 ^•' ��•••• -'•� ::an•...w ' '�r^' APN$9 202-131.61;202.131.62:202.131.27 (FILE a DRc 200-00250 ) L7� ,.,r y..-.. n r[....R w,ne.r...an i r••.u•w.)a. �dp r,-[tt Id 1•iw n � Y —._ �• - -..1�� • r , ` ! ! L ' ...:.- r V n.+n•1• n e �� rc rn,r.a.n• is i�",r'i u r ,�` �._. � I r.�]r_ 1 - -- '-- -' � r � (cu 10 ^ I{1` ( �Nr Flans Corp. ...n _RH�w "'4[a'1�'�FG \ � ♦ 1 � 4 ,1RCHIRALD AVE �a-•w,r rrti•„w..1.nl.K+ F.xr'v'� ...._ _ _ _ - _ -� ..- _ .-._. I - _ - (SU97lf N17A (7 r»vrw•T1ry a•r•„K rar»s a[ e•n v �-� � _ --- ewe nn.r�en.v.rr 1r � t`1µ}] •WI, `weY w�• ' � _ r `' '� �� �Y*al ' Tell ` 'I r rrr trr[.�rkli.rp.h- L ' �T,� • i , t 1 1:: pt:V-r i'f�t4��A''-' \ ; (-_�)r,r — �': .:��-. '�'•" ' , � _[r ��_. � 1 _._ w -rl•w r wns 1•n 11 n+.•I,d] r • , � I � _- �I r � ,!-� i.rr rnrr.�rmW law I ,y �• �� '3{ _.. ---_. - -_ _ , .n ant r.ra r h � —_- - 1 I -,—�• [ I �-f- - - - I � r-. � a.-. r 1 ,) I..rrr,.l rr.r.•.w" -_ YL]IL G F.i RF(O 41 f 56r!'fan t. rn.r rnv»I.,I,x•r -- }r rax 11 f 11 -- — 1— '44, 1__-Al i al 1-14 L --I I ' 102 1-t.IIJPIT Mn" W Td.LC 1{ - _ I i \m n CI Y OF RANCHO CLFCAMONGA _ ::o+., • "�' MOUNTAIN VIEW ESTATES ua "'" t, GRADING PLAN � ��.�r�� �w��w•..,w CONCEPTUAL GRAD vI Y� �� •.M\t INY,1•rNMar1V*rw[,,rG,la+•� i .- jt TRACT NO. 17444 '•,,`''��r' "' ' - n - _ C/L ARC111DALR AVLHVC--. - .- --- --- -,- -. - ! - - - —•— , nr,•,.r•.:...r - _ _\ �a- -�..r:.-•a': -i�+r.f,-- •- �-�-'max*_ f}r+"— x°- �__ �i.i''�:...�!' L� 1 � a�+r`z.tt`---•;,ter "9`-� -- " �l I `�' "'=F _» 4.: .. •c.-- -.._..,_ = --�r.{"';` e"-,�='=W� , ..r•= ...._. =.is�:' -� �^`- "'�' J I�1�es1�LaE1 _C" / �•i 1 k ..i-__ - � --�'+•-�..�=� �:- .i3�F -�_ �����-�'1'_:'-"-a i,,�-.A�����.• �y� _✓ nw.:fi. w... .. //+•�` I _ "`J y�:r..,__I�-...��._��,.. I /, .i...:. { �:isL -�`t�....._--•.`"�r.'.�O �'•' •1- .� —!�^. -�i T s k �.�1_..1 /� �—�� i e•a1 : __ �, - '•,` .r�.'.`I .____ ^"•1 f e loTew ,"::^ J" ! . � n,�1y I 1"�J :w..r,e �{+ '�e '�'r, - .. 4 �.:»r ,1 ...t.a r: y� " •r` 4, ;i��- ,- }1fi .s I, ��' � r I�I� F tee.•.•... t n...... L:J. -h 7 r { i ' r•vn•u�.rL-rc Iji � ,.1' ; �,�.,i{ iJiHf�..�: r•F�s' i. 1 �Y�� � fFac-��~ I � 1` . I �' _ co � ��� � •>4`6 'I's 'IIil1 A a L `� .-- ..• I ..r r W- ly � ' � 3- .��.�. ' 1litA l Ji�R� I rr_`a""'.. !�F dbi�n �1 I1'^.�---+ `�f'_ } 1;�t _s_ • " r-_iir- :��-r�-�+j !`�k : .tweraNl r__^ �I� - -•F. :;•�.;��Tn,, �;;..�` _ 4f !+ '. �i.o-;•i , :'}r'..;�•N\''-•:. .. 9.`•-i-Z'> 'i•. -""'�� r..rid::e•:.n: '`- a%*Y -- -rll , �e' fp~—r• -:k tiN 111111 � j i i I I' '�a} ^•' �. r' y�Jr w' f rh'+ - �' `l�lf,0� 'r."K" ..r'� - I __ I I I I - - , �� . R7 .•-, ' ! 1 �. I I.r�-:wr6" �r�>- vna "i- ' f I i _ :.. ".'."�•R - (/��11 V L• .r y.nf ( 3 JRq �u��?,:E �:['�,0�1 I �f .� � .. •� � � I I IIF;• I I --- irsf ww, ' � llll Iin..raw ill - .... -� .....r 1 Jl(:I;:r; 4s gy, r 'x!(� J E' '' j i a w ar•"" .- I _ �•�'J �_......-- __'�.,.J-�.1 %rr � ii •I 'I y� _.wr�s�� M::i��.:.. '��.{ �a�r' »f.... «.'»:.'.. ^�r��:` s�= ..•r.F---........._'. -- ..,.fT..- �.T.,- .__'� '��. i. __� �= v _ —���f�.�':��.".l.. - I ; I -—_s ' �I - e ;«�:�-1•-^ --' k,„C_ E .•�' •I i 3s 'f � j f f- �'7- .+rtln.•.��r�. _ _ I i rr `_�� i.f��- —_1Y'_�. _~ �m �r' ura •r.,'�'�i�— •'�~T —..Mc• W.4'+>af—�'rY^�}—L v.� !Y r.fcf.i I w,ac tl r ����'�4 rnl..'^".f�.l �� -�'w- �___ S J�3' _ r`'.�.'' ,u:•�'r/ay. .o.....+..r -.e.... 3 T n•a i•0a.°s: � 4.. .,r fr.•.. l� -•__-_ lF.�f ka � n f w:. -� •n ,•_•_: w- � n _-rw"."r. L%Tclt" suerr17444 6 rnec200snazw °^""" - �•pgq- .... drraFRAffCWQMJIRIMMA..ALIFORNIA W&W Technologw%Inc 441AWV /,: �EPRft ORADM Fw+s . .......�.u... o-r � ..�......�.. rrn...na m,._w.e.r.,ir.. .�. im�• rr..n.. r..wr.... ' TRACT AIM HO WMC�iWLAP WOM•IF1M `.i..._ .• ,u Ifaar r�.-am-ru 1WU aq.r,n � f ►HI 71 M CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA I r x MOUNTAIN VIEW ESTATES TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 17444 t•�,„�"� Q FOR CONDOMINIUMS PURPOSES �} N �� ,, •-:'-- - - -------- —.-. ' —. _,--�_-..-_...._ '_- --- - ' �— ---- - - -'--- --•--' ,awry® wcav�eiR nrar— •Ir+n, es .—_.a%'_ ss' !f r° +r f• D� r•" ,r .i•'' .{'.__- s- .r'— ,!� .�i iu __ _ e:i'.'ra�`'v��ws aon. _ _ vex.•.µi.�:.:.'.W`,..a., , - �a' '.C� �--.d�� �- N' _ ..i,N" _ �W— V'.Ylf^ +3'I' r5' :�Y—:�.-. '.i*-..--_1.�0�_�. is-:�t!�_ � :ir:'.�...9� � ia..n. n.•.�.., ,,..,..... - ._ =a_• __ •�''-F 4'�_-_r..��;- \'..11 Yaaa .'". -.•�•r.nr,ti Y n+.,rTn�r� -�-•��•'-FA -�/y'_ __ l• - � , r"�:_ -.--_ v/ '_T'- '�-i k �'I.. 'a n._n��•i,�n,�. -rn "S - _ .r `I • !'•_ H-•--- ;-_ -r_-�- ._ - �•� -�� .�,-�.� `cam--�..-,$J2.!� x..�_r�..--�_•?.�--1.- -�., a�fi's.•-'t'r : ,y (': yII { S S +f ,-�` �: sr�l tom'!` 1• .�4�,__1Y--r- _ _ r-} �•I�i•�y� .:Mriii` ..� -5 ,,.�:o f,•rl IT -'! ,`_� r 1 '` -----. -•� �;t._,.I' -i_ {./It'--�._>}- :,.i .r. li' -� _�• i, '.ti•."'.-,...:!n',�,'a,.'n:i•;�y,,.. cam, y°t-'�— <�•�„,•' - r _�.y - _ '.I:.y. „� _a n t 4yi -i i, .,•j ltf' ` �• f --.iF. ar4'_ i) -,�r M1{' .^tl .S- i • �.r,.. �,. ..,- ±r'- I•' I •'.s:1.,.�..`ii.�v:i'.e IrllHlF 11 C7 {�• � i. �1 rl''r a �`tr� -J \ '�_--III{[`•rn.. I_1..�'�[I...'`\ ,1.1�;•�1 .�•�_ � �I � ...s..a n•ama,s..e ".,, `i: i •ti..� J 1 ' -f I i > ARfllfw '--f• 1 ..; _ 1'__\ _._ • �` �,:{�t ?" -' '!°`- •�,•� `� j`' , I _ it •`L1HIT 1 I f - Milt 77 r" "_ram I��j;. i !};• 4,,�,�ri1 �I I ;I•` - -- ;�:::TS�•4... '—LOT 1� ' .• _? :,,:: - ��, i j -�:..�", ,.ar. �,ir, .. ! 5 ti l.-'>.''"'`i� I f 11� �Ll�.� _L_..__-.i'•. . ._- �._.-I -w..rn m,.a"au.ri":.r,��• - :_ -s��l.-Tc.-�' ----_-- •'3:.r9`t`� # `.;r-t i :3 '7���`�'��-�i '-a'1__�a'.'. ��t �. I � � � ±� j :i�`,srw.•li•�-i�r M1 i.[s w '3 , •.`.1` Tj TI- ] i•� f -i- i .4 F r• is ',r ii 3.� �F �t is '~1-r • .i r-I--li-t`f-cr_ �'-:F!•.'.'�..J_�, .r- ��-., I I � � r��' I I-�:s11�11T�: '"'sy _ �'__"- _� �'`..�' .,\-1•,i rt`Y• —. <r. I r _ �n"'c.ii».ri "'�:::a.•'• � _=77--- `1, ="t�.'IIri+L4a��,' `L II" �j�''`_-_�,`...� ,—�I .,/' }1l,IF11 -_ �~ II ,_--•..,». •-=-�-'__ a,\y.- � � _ ' ! .",i� ,y� I I f��- T��w!' ,��,i'r�� _ ,���5� j �r��� �.•,.. , �:�l;•-;-- — I I' � �I # i :. - -- `;.;� .. ,• HIT7 _' >?! r !!• 3iF 1�' I I 1 11 I [ E_� ! . '.+..rS� r rill _ r � � - -., it-m._? f r- •--•- •I• __•• _._.G..__._ �_. l:1 -Ti - ,.. ... - . ,.-.� ^'..c� , i I .—.- v _ro.,�r"'�. YgNr[nna Mrr[i ,i... In ru.aia,r, 15s fl.R171'�••,a u vC�. O P-VCWG cnkG — r " CU Wa w ®rC� T[HTAYETUGTMMta IM •„ waa t1wI•rM�•� - TRACT r1p.17444 �r1r 1 .t ARCHMILD AVE. 0%4 CAM An&wi 5(ssm a stm f sex Or-ASS HER..FWMT JK Design& IX Associates.Inc 2 0 • . ........ ....... .... ....... V. I 0 g- L F PLANTING Lr-(--f=N[:) TTICE ' sw IA M Dix a t :lx m 9 NO ITP —Y— nstnunfACCENT conceptual tandscapa design X v.>< 01",V, 2K ITrMtsw Iviow" — .1 EiKI. h-ts'tr "P.leg end EAe•Inc MRC•Aex YL j—FI.I.Jz 'MSMK 0�kss 0 wy�st[.CRT 7M LANDSCAPE CONCEPT STATEMENT THE PROPOSED LIM1311CAMINA-1.PROVIDE IMOLOATIM Hftuw Amu tr,. .39 �w pt"atom METER A i PFRIENNI L PLANTINGS TIJROUOHDLrt"�O"AREA&PrM WALLS AND ADJACMr PROPERTIES lsv�Me S"Ep.1'MD L WBPL#t"TfNGS,POOL AMP MAY TryRuctumil An L w Vtm PROVIOr Amp"arAcc roe MCMIATIqll ACTIM1115,INS" F--,PAMTINGS YOU PROVICE511109At600ARKAN.rARKI:MAstrA L-p: WILL IISUrrinwwrim.mAPEINEE AND MRUIM PIrANtING1. I, u x C D.... .1{ ^.,r .T� r {fF.�1T 1 Mnrr r 7 IT n- T #—i LJl ILL !--i A �,—M mf ELCVAY 1Xi co I5UHI71:fJa d DRCMOS-Of/YSVJ -44 lit, t- 0 . M* 'f%, 1 �,�?•- -� �.� — __ _ _- ..� � yam. —- - _�'' -'_ra��_- `�z,� �'�Mrtrt�vnnoYr —_ _ l�l,-R_Piu2rtEvarff]H — — # ftY--r••i �_ �.:i` a� r,, v,R`t`aOu.Ct/rvJl tAtt'eatr�r��xRw4 Mx/w91�:Gllh�1 ----- fE5(HI'1rri � ua:(w, ---'—� wa;cCCU.:f/FCiSY—_ —.. —, -- � � ���•_ .-- #n wn�r��,. imri,i�errp "i.� - '— -- ___L__ LLL - 4r�. — �_ — '�iFLrT'r.r _ --- .. — — �—-- -- -- I�1=—� ---[....,.�,,.,� �nr4r,.::�r''�._. _ �—ra��...�.,...-- — - �K,;.-4. _ — _ _-- —_�jr.��� —_��.�....,r T •'�- _ _. --- — --� A-201.A7 FN OR //�-I., — _ rresrlranP,co.l, �w ;���'..+n I - � - _ _ __-•-_.... .}-�-i; -- .. _ _ � -` Tf�t� - - ?91 - c1i'rL72�4+10ELL'�� jif A C2)-raOM►ELEVAT[OM_ACIFRMATE W ,w (i}FRCW?ELEVA lIUN•!.0 iCAli4 TF. 1 (susrrrrsas wrerao5-W2.'* [ 1 n e 1 HTzi ... N FITil P --- .. Yrw..rn",w ff iWrTccEVArrar urcTmnrE M"AllfI nrinM. — - �•� .r+wrt•, w - ,. �. _ a Y�[[prW 4P.[1PfYif f/+,rq[ -- — - _ n � .— �[, "•'" w:wa.a.w=rw" rw,fv ,r mwm-uwr mr C25fY.rr[n IV, ;qy LrC;tIrmu!!7h:M � !•nw-�..,' .rw,R•T rir `� �: -� �.r,� - A Iw — — - '__`_ —,4 - {�v�i •rt aYi _ _ _ -4-• �r,...1Y,1.,•„lr"r.,rl ® w, ���. ww .�. � ® "nrti rrwt � _— _wl�[�w W�p — ��� '"'•+air,• b„u w.� �� � � — ! �L - - - - - 1•a-201.A2 C D is pj I � - _— r.w � � �<�E` \ �. .� � -�� � •Nnunfatn LRar F� s.. _ • _ rar n.r � t � �' -- ifs-. INLIl llamas Ga� '� , ____ __ o LJOLJONEDC W lJ i'�+ wAONr EiFVArm _ (Sf1tl►717Nsa fZp I)RC290S.00750) C7 ! I I —I T — -- i mTYnEnr a � Elavarfvns �j. fnfF{FlR5tr1�Y� i � .�• - - _ Ms�TER/slL LEGCND I�k' -r Y+111m4 LiR/IKpA1CT ItWSI -- � __ __ GCS I..�wy � r..nw.. a��.. - nr.w �� RI LtPIQ_ 4l!!Rl![�' Vwa!}�Lf/.Hyl �I IE SRb-Ip� Yl sµ -ll•rrn'S.Y N9f � � ��� - _ _ � �� �v Ill Wo..M.Ot �• .a Ana w y --^` — A-201.B1 C D /1 I [ r,--S�� ilprmfafrr Vim .9lx'�' • "+l�a.r �' ► R , r� � � i � 1• Esl.fes ` r n C,—A I ELEVAT,W-AL TERn A7E p l`` 1 FRCN F7F"tIM-A77ERHATE (SUB 7117t1Id 1 ri I Fijr , ku 4 '�4. t�.. _ i.r'v:.c]*�_ ,'t`."``J-- Z.LH. ` � ".1��_ '• III I��������I •YPf f32 _ _ Ehr.uwu �LEFF UEVATIW ALTEIWA7E ... .....�. ..�..... 0 PEARC(EVA FM AL TLWLITE _ MATERl.4L L�GENO {�'E5[7:�'�bx 4 •1 uan�a-� ply.. rOYru-1 �Ifw wY-I.y r.➢l• <,mr.... �.�.. wnn.�w.�s�, l..n..w �� � nra,.s.. fw.o.n..Wrr `® .r n.....p .. —• _— Om _._ . —. n.�. _ ara.rr•t I. rw.an. ru, �� rnw --_—�`_--._� A-201.B2 i C D A ii i Mn"ri:n air. fTIates F.0 f FFT pLFVATfQV 13 C w /j FfftMTtvATrpT QO � - 1 Ul EEO Elrwalir.n- rtwrr.•n EEevAfnohl— I __ _TT-�� MR TLwR/AL LEGQNO V�� �1 ffSGZFrh'I 1".�rsa. Ws nrAllCl!fw4r l[YT'�ra. uFl(nµ u7/nrt0.'Lr/rws — Cif"...... ,........ 11�. ...".... p �.. ....... --- VESMrr.Tr ��`u uafremuc3/+r+n�_ . 1 a...... - — •-. .en_. ._«..'w..�� _ QQ « �n.-t - ..mr...a .a nss.w _ _- •.. r ..b n.K rm y. � �-`�e' �"'�'�'�a.,►.. �j � �•n—ri �i I�w ...— iu«wru �`-- w,�►,;r.... — � �-r IiOi__ _ �`�i....rr ..w�� tea` •x '�� ® �Y ..n ..a."i.s..mi. -_�T� ' �w �A-201.0 SWICF�H V! 4V3dAl KV?dJOOH sa -------------- reszoo-sommin cc Art ,F—f mm$63 tj WTp ——————————- --——- -- LL 7-- —— ———— Q;fl Evar" j Ij v�y DnCM"02WO 14 LI Z ———- ———————- 7 (,)_Sr FLOORPL4N FAts—Ift gar!—f'L— 'TYPE A 2 Fl—Ptws W-­i nf A7 co —A'm.srl, a ;;Z&l ofm-C-P. .J�J]Fi (SUZITT174446 S£Cpr p FLOOFT" "Ott- TYPED? R9 C 0 h --1-1I11110 ;rHtIIHRmr,cr,q. �LJ-11- r-• Lull 15 IL EI (YW L � _ YI � fSUB Iif)1JJG I pRG7'GQS•pl1YAj FIRSI F[OtM"wow- y fl +..r r auu.ru�wr..r• w,s • ---'"rprt.+.ice �. .r.iv lYPEC ROO Plans rr+ern POW [ I a inc i DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 720 p.m. Lou s Le Blanc February 6 2007 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2005 00250 - CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES - A project to construct a 13-unit detached condo development on 2.17 acres in the Medium Residential Zone (8-14 dwelling units per acre) - APN: 0202-131-27, 61, and 62. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT17444 - CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES - A Tentative -tract Map for condominium purposes to create a 13-unit condominium development in the Medium Residential Zone (8-14 dwelling units per acre) - APN: 0202-131-27, 61, and 62. Design Parameters' The project site is located on the west side of Archibald Avenue, south of Victoria Street - APN: 202-131-27, 202-131-61, and 202-131-62. The project consists of 13 detached homes to be subdivided and sold as condominiums with common and private areas. All elevations exhibit wall movement providing relief and visual interest to the wail planes. The applicant is proposing a total of 3 models, 2 of which are two-story models and one single-story floor model. Atf 3 models will use stucco as a primary material. Model Numbers A-1 and C. will have a band of stack stone veneer around the building and entryways. Model Number A-2 will have a band of real river rock around the building and entryways, plus wood siding and wood accent trim to compliment architecture. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Maior Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project. 1. There are no major issues. Secondary Issues: 1. Additional guest parking should be explored. It is staff's opinion that the site needs additional guest parking or design the units to have longer driveways that will provide additional temporary parking. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Committee review the project with a I major issues resolved and recommends review and approval by the Planning Commission. Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Munoz, Stewart, Diaz Staff Planner: Louis Le Blanc The p'ans were reviewed by the Comm ttee a-id t-e item was (,ont rued to g ve the applicant time to respond to the fol:owing nornmerits. Issues raised by the Des g.• Review Commcttee included the Pc /L)/w/ 7 EXHIBIT H A,B,&C- 21 DRC ACTION AGENDA DRC2005-00250 AND SUBT T 17444 February 6, 2007 Page 2 following: 1) add (doub e) the required amount of visitor parking, including req,iired d sabled parking space, 2) list and identify on-site recreational amenities for the pro,ect, 3) re-study and modify the proportions of window size/shapes relative to large stucco planes on all modes and at the ironUrear (major gable ends) of unit A2, 4) eliminate the use of single-shutter appl cations on the building elevations to avoid an unbalanced appearance, and 5) correct exterior notes to indicate the use of natural river rock where proposed (no manufactured river rock veneer allowed). A,B,&C- 22 0 DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:50 p.m. Tabe van der Zwaag July 3, 2007 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT17444 - CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES - A request to subdivide 2.17 acres for the purpose of creating a 13 unit condominium development in the Medium Residential District, located on the south of Victoria Street and west of Archibald Avenue - APN: 202-131-27, 61, and 62. Related Fires: Development Review DRC2005-00250, Zone Change DRC2005-00523, Variance DRC2007-00390, Minor Exception DRC2005-00522. Tree Removal Permit DRC2005-00521 and Preliminary Review DRC2004-00331. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2005-00250 - CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES - A request to develop a 13 unit detached condominium project on 2.17 acres in the Medium Residential District, located on the south side of Victoria Street and west of Archibald Avenue - APN: 0202-131-27, 61, and 62. Related Files: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444, Zone Change DRC2005-00523, Variance DRC2007-00390, Minor Exception DRC2005-00522, Tree Removal Permit DRC2005-00521 and Preliminary Review DRC2004-00331. Design Parameters: The project consists of 13 detached homes to be subdivided and sold as condominiums with common and private areas. All elevations exhibit wall movement providing relief and the visual interest to the wall planes. The applicant is proposing a total of 3 models, 2 of which are two- story models and one single-story floor model. All 3 models will use stucco as a primary material. Model Numbers Al and C will have a band of stack stone veneer around the building and entryways. Model Number A2 will have a band of real river rock around the bui.ding and entryways, plus wood siding and wood accent trim to compliment architecture. Background,: The project first went to the Design Review Committee on February 6, 2006. At that time staff was concerned that there was insufficient guest parking. The Design Review Committee agreed with staff and required that the applicant double the amount of guest parking. The applicant complied and has doubled the amount of guest parking from 5 spaces to 10 spaces. The Committee also asked the applicant to make the following design changes: 1) list and identify on-site recreational amenities for the project; 2) redesign the windows on all models and the front and rear elevations on Model A2 in order to reduce the current large stucco planes which give the homes an unbalanced appearance; 3) eliminate the use of single-shutter applications; 4) use real river rock instead of river rock veneer. The applicant has complied with all of the Committee's requirements as follows: 1) they have added recreational amenities to the Site Plan; 2) they added additional windows to the side elevations of Models A and B and added a hip-on-gable roof to the front an rear elevations of Model A2; 3) they have eliminated all single-shutter applications; 4) they will only use real river rock when river rock is called out. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Major Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project. 1. There are no major issues. Secondary Issues: 1. All secondary issues have been resolved. A,B,&C- 23 DRC ACTION AGENDA July 3, 2007 Page 2 Staff Recommendation: Staff believes that the applicant has complied with all of the design changes outlined by the Committee and recommends approval as submitted. Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Lou Munoz, Michael Diaz Staff Planner: Tabe van der Zwaag The Design Review Committee accepted the project as presented except for the request to remove window shutters from selected windows on each model. A,B,&C- 24 0 RESOLUTION NO. 07-59 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT17444, A REQUEST TO SUBDIVIDE 2.17 ACRES FOR THE PURPOSE OF CREATING A 13 UNIT CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT IN THE MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT(8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE). THE PROJECT IS LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND 150 FEET NORTH OF MONTE VISTA STREET; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN: 0202-131-27, 61 AND 62. A. Recitals. 1. Creative Design Associates filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444, as described in the title of this Resolution. However, a Development District Amendment has also been submitted that would amend the designation to Low-Medium residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre). Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 10th day of October 2007, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A,of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing October 10, 2007, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to the property located at the on the west side of Archibald Avenue and 150 feet north of Monte Vista Street; and b. The subject site slopes generally from north to south and has 45 trees of various species; and C. The properties to the north and west of the subject site are developed with a mobile home park; the properties to the south are developed with single-family homes; and the property to the east is developed with apartments; and d. The application is to subdivide approximately 2.17 acres of land into 13 detached condominiums; and e. The site will share access from Archibald Avenue with the neighboring mobile home park_ 0 C� PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 07-59 SUBTT17444—CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES October 10, 2007 Page 2 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The tentative tract map is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code,and any applicable specific plans; and b. The design or improvements of the tentative tract map is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans; and C. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; and d. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; and e. The tentative tract map is not likely to cause serious public health problems; and f. The design of the tentative tract map will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application,the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act("CEQA")and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination,a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter,the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i)that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures,there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. c. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. if C. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 07-59 SUBTT17444 — CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES October 10, 2007 Page 3 d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) Final recordation of tract map conditioned on approval by the City Council of Development District Map Amendment DRC2005-00523. 2) All pertinent conditions of approval for Development Review DRC2005-00250 shall apply. 3) Tree Removal Permit DRC2005-00521 is hereby approved for the removal of up to 45 trees of various species. If any of the 6 trees outlined in the arborist report can be incorporated into the Landscape Plan for the project, the applicant shall protect the trees with a barrier as outlined in the arborist report. Because of Borer beetle infestation,all Eucalyptus tree wood shall be chipped, removed, and buried at a dump s to or tarped to the ground for a minimum of 6 months, sealing the tarp edges with soil, to prevent emerging Borer beetles from reinfesting other trees or wood. The movement of Eucalyptus wood containing live Borer beetles, or their larvae, in trucks or trailers is prohibited by State law pursuant to Public Resources Code 4714.5. 4) Trees shall be planted at a quantity of 40 trees per acre. All trees shall be minimum 24-inch box size trees. 5) All perimeter walls shall be decorative and have a uniform design that is compatible with those in the area. Engineering Department 1) Archibald Avenue is a City"Major Arterial." Development will be required to install improvements along the full frontage on Archibald Avenue to City standards, extending south to Monte Vista Street and north of the driveway (street type entry) at Victoria Street including, but not limited to, curb and gutter at 36 feet from centerline of Archibald Avenue, AC pavement to centerline of street, curvilinear sidewalk, primary and secondary access, street lights and street trees. All Public improvements to be in accordance with the City's "Major Arterial" street design standards. a) Provide primary site ingress.'egress access from the joint use driveway along the northerly property line in accordance with City "Driveway Policy," aligned centerline to centerline with Victoria Street. This entry PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 07-59 SUBTT17444 —CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES October 10, 2007 Page 4 is a street type and will include cross gutter, pavement, curb returns with radius per City Standard No. 100-B and access ramps. b) Provide secondary drive approach access in accordance with City "Driveway Policy"and Standard No. 101 Type C(drive approach entry). c) Provide traffic signing and striping on Archibald Avenue as required. d) Provide R-26 "NO-PARKING" signs and additional traffic signing and striping as required by the City Engineering Traffic Section. e) Curvilinear sidewalk shall remain within street right-of-way and cross drive approach at the zero-inch curb face. f) Complete street improvements south to Monte Vista Street, including curb return with single access ramp. Provide an ADA compliant access ramp on each of the Monte Vista Street corners. g) Provide a new storm drain catch basin on west side of Archibald Avenue, north of Monte Vista Street. h) Relocate the existing catch basin on the west side, north of the new joint use driveway. 2) Development will be required to install all missing frontage improvements on Monte Vista Street including street trees, curb return, sidewalk, and access ramps per Condition 1.f. above. 3) Remove an existing headwall at the northwest corner of Archibald Avenue and Monte Vista Street and replace with a local storm drain system to serve the mobile home park and other areas to the north that are tributary to this site. The storm drain should be placed under the project drive aisles and sized to handle developed capacity from all tributary areas. The trees cannot be planted within 5 feet of the storm drain line. Provide catch basins on Archibald Avenue (Conditions 1.g. and 1.h. above). Provide for 0100 secondary surface overflow in case the local storm drain pipe should become filled to capacity or blocked. Surface overflow shall drain across this site to Archibald Avenue. Curbside drain outlets through the right-of-way may be necessary. Surface overflow system shall be designed to handle the Q100 event, and the pond depth can be no greater than 12 inches in automobile parking areas. a) In case of blockage at the proposed storm drain headwall inlet structure, Grading Plan shall be revised as necessary(including pad/FF elevations)during the building permit plan check period to produce flow line, top-of-curb grades, rate of slope and other to maintain secondary surface overflow within project drive aisle until outlet to public street. b) Backwater ponding effect at the headwall shall not occur on the adjacent property. Any backwater ponding shall only occur on-site per the revised final drainage study analysis. 0 C PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 07-59 SUBTT17444 — CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES October 10, 2007 Page 5 c) Storm drain and surface overflow easements shall be dedicated to the City. 4) Final drainage study shall address: a) Headwall considerations in Condition 3 above. b) Overflow route across project to Archibald Avenue on Monte Vista Street in the event of headwall inlet blockage. c) Determine actual tributary area currently reaching this facility (interim condition)in the absence of future MPSD planned for Amethyst Avenue and Lemon Avenue, and whether interim condition warrants mitigation measures. d) Determine ultimate tributary area and design requirements. 5) It shall be the developer's responsibility to have the current Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) Zone A designation removed from the project area. The developer shall provide drainage and/or flood protection facilities sufficient to obtain an un-shaded zone "X" designation for the project area. The developer's engineer shall prepare all the necessary reports, plans, and hydrologic/ hydraulic calculations. A Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) shall be obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency(FEMA) prior to approval of the final map or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. A Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) shall be issued by FEMA prior to occupancy or improvement acceptance, whichever occurs first. a) If the Federal Emergency Management Agency is unwilling to revise the Flood Insurance Rate Map, elevation certificates shall be provided for lots within the flood zone. 6) Lot 6 finish floor is lower than the adjacent drive aisle top-of-curb (to the north), located east of the proposed storm drain inlet headwall. This may direct overflow toward Lot 6 and this could be a potential flooding problem should the inlet become blocked. a) In accordance with Building and Safety typical lot grading, finish floor elevation should be set no less than 2 percent from the highest adjacent top of street curb plus one-half foot(check with Building and Safety Department). 7) Dual wall scenario shown in Grading Plan Section C-C could force inlet overflows onto the adjacent property to the south. Provide method of draining area between walls and/or accepting cross lot drainage from the adjacent site. 8) Maintenance of BMPs identified in the WQMP shall be addressed in the project CC&Rs. 0 { PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 07-59 SUBTT17444 —CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES October 10, 2007 Page 6 9) Ultimate street right-of-way for Archibald Avenue, measured from centerline of street, is currently showing 53.2 feet. This shall remain and provide/obtain additional easement(s)for the main Archibald Avenue ingress/egress entry to facilitate the street type entry as required and for traffic signal equipment. 10) All existing overhead utilities fronting this development shall be undergrounded and/or removed in accordance with City requirements. 11) This developer shall install and maintain private landscaping as well as street trees within the parkways on Archibald Avenue and Monte Vista Street, fronting this development. 12) in addition to other Engineering fees, a non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated cost of operating all street lights during the first 6 months of operation, prior to building permit issuance or approval of the final map, whichever occurs first. 13) A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate landscape and lighting districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 14) Provide public storm drain overflow easement on final map(12 feet minimum for pipe, but overflow may require more). Environmental Mitigation Air Quality 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions.,The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers'specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 0 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 07-59 SUBTT17444— CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES October 10, 2007 Page 7 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated w:th water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce Fine Particulate Matter (PM10) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 10) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating,air condit oning, appliances, and water heaters. 11) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripe ng. Biological Resources 1) Preserve or relocate the following trees: F f PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 07-59 SUBTT17444 —CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES October 10, 2007 Page 8 • 3 Jeffrey Pine Trees identified as trees 16, 17, and 18 in report. • 1 Canary Island Date Palm identified as tree 31 in report. • 1 Eucalyptus Lemon Scented Gum identified as tree 32 in report. • 1 Coast Live Oak identified as tree 33 in report. 2) One hundred percent of the trees to be planted to meet the City's 40 trees per acre requirement shall be minimum 24-inch box size trees. Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist,the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEOA guidelines. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain aqualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring)that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: r` PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 07-59 SUBTT17444 —CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES October 10, 2007 Page 9 • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. ■ Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. Geology and Soils 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) daily to reduce PM10 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM10 emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. Hydrology and Water 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to Building Official for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SW PPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in grading plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a} Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods Q C S PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 07-59 SUBTT17444—CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES October 10, 2007 Page 10 experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction,temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. Post- Construction Operational., 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by W & W Technologies on April 27, 2005, to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 6) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. 7) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 8) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits,applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent(NOI)to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit, Noise 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m.on weekdays, including Saturday,or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 0 t PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 07-59 SUBTT17444 —CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES October 10, 2007 Page 11 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D,as measured at the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards,then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 3) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase. 4) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of B-00 p.m.and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. 5) Construct a continuous 7-foot high solid wall with no openings or gaps along the entire Archibald Avenue frontage at the 45-foot setback from the curb-face and wrapping around at the north and south ends to a distance to be determined by final acoustical report. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2007. PLANNING C MMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Pam ark, Chairman ATTEST: -d&wV& Jam q R. Troyer, AICP, Secreta I, James R.Troyer, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced,passed,and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of October 2007, by the following vote-to-wit: Q C� f PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 07-59 SUBTT17444 —CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES October 10, 2007 Page 12 AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FLETCHER, HOWDYSHELL, MUNOZ, STEWART, WIMBERLY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: NONE 0 City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: DRC2005-00523, SUBTT17444, DRC2005-00250, AND DRC2005-00522 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP)has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the (Mitigated Negative Declaration/Environmental Impact Report) for the above-listed project. This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements: 1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project. 2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management - The MMP wel be in place through all phases of the project. The project planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants'fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. 2. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when,and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority for processing the project. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address: City of Rancho Cucamonga - Lead Agency Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 0 Mitigation Monitoring Program DRC2005-00523, SUBTT17444, DRC2005-00250, AND DRC2005-00522 Page 2 3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staff's is needed, as determined by the project planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation} activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner. 4. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development. 5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. 6. Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel. 7. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after written notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. 8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division. The Division shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants an&or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time. 9. In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the monitoring results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: SUBTT17444 and DRC2005-00250 Applicant: Eric Chen Creative Design Assoc. initial Study Prepared by: Tabe van der Zwaasr Date: October 10 2007 ResponsibleMitigation Measures No. I [,'Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date Air Quality All construction equipment shall be maintained in good PID C Review of plans AIC W4 operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. Contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers'specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. Prior to the issuance of any Grading Permits, the PDFBO C Review of plans C 2 developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District(SCAQMD)as well as City Planning Staff. All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed PD C Review of plans AFC 214 performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume,low-pressure spray. — Ail asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards BO B Review of plans AFC 2 noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD BO C Review of plans AIC 214 Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: ■ Reestablish ground cover on the construction site SO C Review of plans AIC 20 through seeding and watering. 1 of 8 Responsiblef Mitigition Measures No. I ,I!mplementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verif ication Verification Date 11nitials Non-Compliance Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. BO C Review of plans A!C 2/4 Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 j areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule. activities to minimize the amounts of BO C Review of plans A!C 2/4 exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. ■ Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance BO C Review of plans A 4 with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established BO During A 4 by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public construction thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., BO C During A 4 wind speeds exceeding 25 mph)in accordance with construction SCAQMD Rule 403 requirements. _ ■ Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils BO C During A 4 haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other Construction suitable means. _ Tho site shall be treated with water or other soil- BO C During A 4 stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional construction Water Quality Control Board[RWQCB]) daily to reduce PMIO emissions,in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. _ Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and BO C During A 4 RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PMIa emissions. The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean BO C Review of plans A/C 4 alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. The construction contractor shall ensure that BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. i 2 of 8 Method Mitigation Measures No.I Responsible Monitoring Timing of Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date 11nitials Non-Compliance All residential and commercial structures shall be BO CM Review of plans C V4 required to incorporate high efficiency/low polluting heating,air conditioning,appliances,and water heaters. All residential and commercial structures shall be 113O DID Review of plans C 2A required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. Biological Resources Preserve or relocate the following trees: pD B Review of Plans C 2 • Three Jeffrey Pine Trees identified as trees 16, J 17, and 18 in report. One Canary Island Date Palm identified as tree 31 in report. One Eucalyptus Lemon Scented Gum identified i as tree 32 in report. • One Coast Live Oak identified as tree 33 In report. i One hundred percent of the trees to be planted to meet PD B Review of Plans C 2 the City's 40 trees per acre requirement shall be minimum 24-inch box size trees. Cultural Resources If any prehistoric archaeological resources are 1 encountered before or during grading,the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist,the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: y Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites PD/BO C Review of report PAD 314 from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. 3of8 • .. . . . . ,*Mitigation Measures No. Date [Initials Non-Compliance lOmplementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification ■ Consider establishing provisions to require PDIBO C Review of report AID 314 incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a ' theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the PD180 C Review of report '°'�d 3f4 archaeological heritage of the area. I Review of re art JD 3/4 ■ propose mitigation measures and recommend f'DfBO C P conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CBQA 5 guidelines. • Prepare a technical resources management report, PD C Review of report AID 314 documenting the inventory,evaluation,and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report, with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal PD B Review of report AID 4 fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring)that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and PD B Review of report AID 4 equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay,to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. 1. 4 of 8 Mitigation Measures No. I Responsible Monitoring Timing of of Verified Sanctions for :.-Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date /initials Non-Compliance • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared BO B Review of report +D or graded,divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. ■ Prepare,identify,and curate all recovered fossils for PD D Review of report D documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). ■ Submit summary report to City of Rancho PD D Review of report D 3 Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy to the report to San Bernardino County Museum. Geology and Salts The site shall be treated with water or other BO C During A 4 soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and construction RWQCB)daily to reduce PMja emissions,in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a BO C During A 4 schedule established by the City to reduce PMja construction emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. I _ Grading operations small be suspended when wind BO O During A 4 ! speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM11)emissions from construction the site during such episodes. Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and BO C During A 4 RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. i 5 of 8 i Hydrology and Water Quality i Prior to issuance of Grading Permits,the permit applicant BO BIC/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 shall submit to Building Official for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices(BMPs)thatshall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the I inaximum extent practical. An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in BO BICID Review of plans A/C 2/4 grading plan,and implemented for the proposed project i that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time of ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This ' Erosion Control Plan shall include the following Q measures eta minimum; a)Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize sail exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on- site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. During construction,temporary berms such as sandbags BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. During construction,to remove pollutants,streetcleaning BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 214 will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in CE B/C/D Review of plans AIC 214 the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by W&W Technologies on April 27, 2005, to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 6 of 8 i Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling BO BICID Review of plans A/C 2/4 and minimizing the use of fertilizerslpesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years,shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of Grading Permits. Prior to issuance of Building Permits,the applicant shall CE BICID Review of plans A/C 214 submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP),including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (EMPs)that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and A non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. Prior to issuance of Grading or Paving Permits,applicant BO BICID Review of plans A/C 2/4 shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. i Noise Construction or grading shall not take place between the BO C During A 4 hours of 8:00 p.m.and 6:30 a.m.on weekdays,including construction Saturday,or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. I i 7 of 8 Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the BO C During A 4 standards specified in Development Code Section construction 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards,then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as earlyas PD C During A A possible in the first phase. construction Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the PO/BO C During A 417 hours of 8:00 p.m.and 6:30 a.m.on weekdays,including construction Saturday,or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible,the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. Construct a continuous 7-foot high solid wall with no PD C During Plan A 4 openings or gaps along the entire Archibald Avenue Check frontage at the 45-foot setback from the curb-face and wrapping around at the north and south ends to a distance to be determined by final acoustical report. Key to Checklist Abbreviations Responsible Person Monitoring Frequency Method of Verifiontlon Sanctions COD-Community Development Director or designee A-With Each New Development A-On-site Inspection t-Withhold Recordation or Final Map PO-Planning Director or designee S-Prior To Construction B-Other Agency Permit!Approval 2-Withhold Grading or Building Permit CE-City Engineer or designee C-Throughout Construction C-Plan Check 3-Withhold Certificate or occupancy BO-Building Official or designee D-On Completion D-Separate Submittal(Reports/Studies/Plans) 4-Stop Work Order PO-Police Captain or designee E-Operat.ng 5-Retain Deposit or Bonds FC-Fire Chief or des gnee 6-Revoke CUP I:Vlanning Uinal%cegalmmchklst-rev12-4-06f inai.doc 8 of 8 O COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT "* DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT#: DRC2005-00250 AND SUBTT17444 SUBJECT: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICANT: CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES LOCATION: WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND 150 FEET NORTH OF MONTE VISTA STREET- - APN: 0202-131-27, 61 AND 62 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. General Requirements Completion Date 1. The applicant shalt agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its _l�l agents,officers,or employees, because of the issuance of such approval,or in the alternative,to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or emp oyees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may,at its sole d,scretion, ;participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. Approval of Tentative Tract No. SUBTT17444 is granted subject to the approval of DRC2005-00250. I Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. 07-59, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed1stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 4, The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below. The / 1 project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Ptanning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission or Planning Director hearing: a) Notice of Exemption-S50 b) Notice of Determination -$50 c) Negative Declaration -S 1,850____ X d) Environmental Impact Report - S2,550 SC-1-05 1 I:1PLF,t:t11i:G=!�!�!+,P!NCC041�Ati27v7 Res£,St RPt�D-X2005•C7250S;dC3nd 10-10.dx 0 Q ' iact t.o 5lioiTi7--:AtJd DRC2-,l]c, _C�s"0 Comm--=lion Date 5. Crime Free Multi-Family Housino Prooram - The owner sha'. cause the manager and any resident ma-iager ti}complete the training for and enrol-the project in the San Bernardino County Crime Free Multi-Family Housing Program B. Time Limits 1. This tentative tract map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the City Engineer within 3 years from the date of the approval. 2. Development/Design Review approval shall expire if building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval. No extensions are allowed. C. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, arch?tectural elevations,exterior materials and colors, landscaping,sign program,and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations. 2, Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon,all Conditions �ll� of Approval sha:! be completed to the satisfact'on of the Planning Director. 3- Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and 1 / State Fire Marsha' regulations have been complied wth. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Department to show compliance. The buildings sha'I be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be 1 I submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigat.'on, and street improvement plans steal be coordinated for l l consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, t-ee removal, encroachment, building, etc.)or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code,all other app':cable City Ordinances, and app;,cable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of bu ding permit issuance. 7. A detailed on-site fighting plan, including a photometric diagram,shall be reviewed and approved �I 1 by the Planning Director and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of building perm ts. Such plan shall indicate style,illumination, location,height,and method of shie:ding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. 8. If no centralized trash receptacles are provided,a:i trash pick-up shall be for individual units with ail receptacles shie'ded from public view. 9. Trash receptade(s)are required and shall meet City standards. The final design,locations,and the number of trash receptac.es shall be subject to Pianning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 10. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as t-ansformers, AC condensers. etc., shall be 1 1 located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, andior landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. For single-family residential developments,transformers steal' be placed in underground vaults. 2 FNAL F- . r S"Awl 0 C Gomoie--- tian oat' 11. Street names shag be submitted for Panning Director review ar,d approval in accordance with the / 1 adopted Street Blaming Po'.cy pr:or to approval of the final map. 12. All building numbe-s and individual units shall be identif'ed in a clear and concise manner, �l I including proper illumination. — 13. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Departments and the City Attorney. They sha€l be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer. The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the P anning Department a list of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes. 14, All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property _/ /_ owner, homeowners'association,or other means acceptab'e to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and City Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of building permits. 15. Solar access easements shall be dedicated for the purpose of assuming that each lot or dwelling unit shall have the right to receive sunlight across adjacent lots or units for use of a solar energy system. The easements may be contained in a Declaration of Restrictions for the subdivision which shall be recorded concurrently with the recordation of the final map or issuance of permits, whichever comes first. The easements shall prohibit the casting of shadows by vegetation, structures, fixtures, or any other object, except for utility wires and similar objects, pursuant to Development Code Section 17.08.060-G-2. 16. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all lots for Planning Director and City Engineer approval; including, but not limited to, public notice requirements,special street posting,phone listing for community concerns,hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing. 17. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double wall l l cond-tion would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/ fences along the project's perimeter. 18. Construct block walls between homes(i.e.,along interior side and rear property lines),rather than wood fencing for permanence, durability, and design consistency. 19. Access gates to the rear yards shall be constructed from a material more durable than wood I_I gates. Acceptable materials include, but are not limited to, wrought iron and PVC. 20. For residential development, return walls and corner side walls shall be decorative masonry. 21. On corner side yards,provide minimum 5-foot setback between walls/fences and sidewalk. The 1 I_ 5-foot wall/fence setback and the parkway shall have landscape and irrigation in addition to the required street trees. Detailed landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. The parkway landscaping including trees,shrubs, ground covers and irrigation shall be maintained by the property owner. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the parkway maintenance requirement, in a standard format as determined by the Planning Director, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 22. For residential development, recreation area/facility shall be provided as required by the I�l_ Development Code. 3 L1?L� ."ilr G,F1�;4L1PLf.CCO[:1f:120�7 CJ3; & S`f Rot-DRC2005.00250S1JC0nd 10-1c �i5�`h,g SUEi,, �-ac:A�•�C C�C2005-00c50 5 Comole— t'°n Date D. Landscaping 1, A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. 2. Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in �I / accordance with the Municipal Code Section 19.08.110,and so noted on the grading plans. The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans. The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting, and trimming methods. 3. A minimum of 40 trees per gross acre,comprised of the following sizes,shall be provided within 1 I the project. ---—— 4. All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than 2:1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 5. All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater 1 I` slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq.ft.of slope area 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq.ft.of slope area,and appropriate ground cover. In addition,slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 6. For single-family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer. Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Department to determine that they are in satisfactory condition. 7. Front yard and corner side yard-andscaping and irrigation shall be required per the Development Code. This requirement shal'be in addition to the required street trees and slope planting. 8. The final design of the perimeter parkways,walls,landscaping,and sidewalks shall be included in 1 /_ the required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Department. 9. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 10. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas,the 1 I design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Department. '— 11. Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for Planning Director review and 1 1 approval prior to issuance of building permits.These criteria shall encourage the natural growth i characteristics of the selected tree species. 12, Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of Xeriscape as def-ned in Chapter 19.16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. 4 I FL4R'`:l�i� cNAL\PLN:;COM.','2017 Ra- w 5r"R=`.7RC20C,5.002505t�^=1 10•'0 dz�c C J�ct No. $Ut3T 1 i AND ORC2005-0,25-i Comol-- ion Dale E. Environmental 1. Noise levels shad be monitored after construction to verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures. Nose levels shall be monitored by actual noise level readings taken on-and off-site. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to final occupancy release. The final report shall also make recommendations as to additional mitigation measures to reduce noise levels to below City standards, such as, residential exterior noise levels to below 60 dBA and interior noise attenuation to below 45 dBA. 2. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for Panning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. The final report shall discuss the lever of interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the buiid,ng materials and construction techniques provided, and if appropriate,verity the adequacy of the mitigation measures. The building plans will be checked for conformance w'th the mitigation measures contained in the final report. 3. The applicant shall submit certification from an acoustical engineer that all recommendations of 1 1 the acoustical report were imp'emented in construction, including measurements of interior and exterior noise levels to document compliance with City standards. Certification shall be submitted to the Building & Safety Department prior to final occupancy release of the affected homes. 4. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of I I implementing said measures,including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to i post cash, letter of credit,or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Planning Director in the amount of S 538 prior to the issuance of building permits,guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit. 5. In those instances requiring long term monitoring(i.e.)beyond final certificate of occupancy),the 1 I applicant shall provide a written monitoring and reporting program to the Planning Director prior to issuance of building permits. Said program shall identify the reporter as an ind;vidual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. F. Other Agencies 1. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes. Multi-family residential developments shall prov de a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT,(909)477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) G. General Requirements 1. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: I / a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Fcundation Plan; c. Floor Plan; 5 f ?LA�fNffJG Flh4L'PLf1SCd",1rAL0�7 Ras&St'Pp11DRC2005-00250S'!Cond .-�•10 y= 0 Comale� Gon Cate d. Ceiling, Roof, and Floor Framing Plan and reverse Ceiling, Roof and Floor Framing Plan (when applicable); e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, dumber and size of service entrance conductors,panel schedules, and s'ngle line diagrams; f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans,including isometrics,underground diagrams,water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air condition°ng; and g. Planning Department Project Number(i.e., SUBTT17444 and DRC2005-00250) -clearly identified on the outside of al' plans. 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a so0s report. Architect's!Engineer's stamp and wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers'Compensation coverage to the City prior to permit issuance. 4. Developers wishing to participate in the Community Energy Efficiency Program (CEEP) can contact the Building and Safety Department staff for information and submittal requirements. H. Site Development 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shal', be marked with the project Ne number(i.e., SUBTT117444 and DRC2005-00250 ). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes,and all other applicable codes,ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commerc,'al or industrial development project or l�l^ major addition,the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee,Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees,Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees. Applicant shall provide a copy of the schoo:fees receipt to the Building and Safety Department prior to permits issuance, 3. The Building and Safety Official shall provide the street addresses after tract/parcel map recordation and prior to issuance of building permits. 4. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6.30 a.m. Monday through Saturday,with no construction on Sunday or holidays. I. New Structures 1. Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness. 2. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations. l_I^ 3. Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's 'high wind"Instructions. J. Grading 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with California Building Code,City Grad'ng hh Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be 'n substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. Ix I IPLA�3'l1�1G'FIB 1L\PLNGC0'/1',1 2007 Res E S"RpkDF3C2005.00250Si•jCond 10-10 doc 0 t'" .:�?PJ�. 7!'3•I i i7-.:�,�,t.'J D°C2��:•��35`S 1 Comoiation Data 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer lice-ised by the State of California to perform such work. 3. A geo'ogical report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check. 4. The final grading plan, appropriate certifications and compact°on reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped,and signed by a California registered Civil Engineer. Note on title sheet that plans must be submitted for plan check and be approved prior to construction. The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances,and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Department if you have any questions about the procedure at (909) 477-2710. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: K. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets(measured from l�l street centerline): — -- 50 total feet on Archibald Avenue 2. Comer property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. 3. Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&Rs or by �l`I deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map or prior to the issuance of building permits, where no map is invo:ved. 4. Reciprocal parking agreements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all common roads, drives, or parking areas shall be provided by CC & R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to, or concurrent with, the final parcel map. 5. Pr,vate dra rage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or noted on the final map. 6. Easements for public sidewalks and future traffic s'gnal equipment placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City at Victoria Street entry. 7 11PLhvi.l � �!'•:-!+PLfi GCQ'+1:'ty37 Ras& Sti Rpt'DR02005•07250Stdoond 10-10 doc 0 i,?. SU5771744a DRC=70�•D0?50 Comolet+on Dates L. Street Improvements 1. Pursuant to City Council Reso;ut:on No.88-557,no person shall make connections from a source �l I of energy,fuel or power to any building service equipment which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council,except:that in developments containing more than one building or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of those buildings, or units proportionate to the completion of improvements as required by conditions of approval of development. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings or units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of approval of development. 2. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Curb& A.C. Side- Drive Street Street Comm Median Bike Street Name Gutter Pvmt walk Appr. Lights Trees Trail I Island Trail other Archibald Avenue X X (c) X X X (e) Monte Vista Street X X X X (f) Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114. (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item. e) Curbside drain outlet; (f) Access ramps 3. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees,street Fghts,and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal pans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements,prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required. C. Pavement striping,marking,traffic signing,street name signing,traffic signal conduit,and l_I_ interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed w,th any new construction or reconstruction 1 /_ project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes: 1) Pu'l boxes shall be No. 6 at inte-sect;ons and No. 5 along streets,a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel w1h pul' rope or as specified. e. Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City _I_h Standards or as d=rected by the City Engineer. 8 I Pt.;'.,:I':GFIiJyL1P1,t.GCO':1tll BOG;R,s£ 5c`?=f,„DRC2005-G0250Si�Cond ;p•i0.d�c 0 Completion Date f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving,which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be 1 1 installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Director prior to submittal for first plan check. 4. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. 5. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet—(typically sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. The City Engineer reserves the right to adjust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables. For additional information, contact the Project Engineer. Min. Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Space Spacing Size oty. Archibald Avenue Platanus acerifolia London Plane Tree 8' 30'O.C. 15 Gal I Fill Foreground Tree In P.A.8'or Greater Pyrus calleryana NCN 3' 20'O.C. 15 Gal P.A. Less than 8' 'Aristocrat' Under power lines Lagerstoemia indcca Crape Myrtle Hybrid— 3' 20'O.C. 24"Box 'Tuscarora' Pink Background tree Magnolia grandiflora'St. NCN 3' 25 O.C. 15 Gal with Piatanus Mary with Pyrus Platanus aceriflia London Plane Tree 8' 30'O.C. 15 Gal Accent Tree Lagerstoemia indica Crape Myrtle Hybrid— 3' 20'O.C. 15 Gal Tuscarora' Pink Victoria Street Pistacia chinesis Chinese Pistache 5' 37 O.C. 15 Gal Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting,an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Department. 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 6. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. M. Public Maintenance Areas 1. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 9 '�L=„'JIP�G.Fi';yLl?LP;3CO�.itril?D07 FI3,2. 5`.;Rp,DRC2035-��-S�StdCo:-rd i0.10:'�c Q .' _.t NO SUB i T'---_AND D- 005-^r ,3^ COMDlet+on Date 2. Parkway landscaping on the following street(s� shal, conform to the results of the respective _l�h Beautification Master Plan Archibald Avenue. N. Drainage and Flood Control 1. It shall be the developer's responsibility to have the current FIRM Zone A designation removed from the project area. The developer shall provide drainage and/or flood protection fac4ities sufficient to obtain an unshaded "X" designation. The developer's engineer shal prepare all necessary reports, plans, and hydraog?c/hydraulic calculations. A Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) shal'i be obtained from FEMA prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. A Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) shal' be issued by FEMA prior to occupancy or improvement acceptance, whichever occurs first. 2. A final drainage study shalt be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to fina'map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. 3. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. 4. A permit from the San Bernardino County Flood Control District is required for work within its right-of-way. 5. Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside d ameter of any public storm drain pipe measured I`I from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk. 6. Public storm drain easements shall be graded to convey overflows in the event of a blockage in a _ll� sump catch basin on the public street, and provisions made to pass through walls. 4. Utilities 1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water,gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. / 3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District(CVW D), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District,and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits,whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects, 4. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. P. General Requirements and Approvals 1. An easement for a joint use driveway shall be obtained prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first, for: Street type driveway aligned with Victoria Street. 2. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City,covering the estimated operating costs for all _I-1— new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved. 10 I.LoLANNING.cl-NAL-PLNGCOM%1 2007 Res E S'1 Rp'DRC2005-002505t�Cond 10-10 doc 5 Corno!e� t oR Qat_ 3. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrat_ve fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentat'on is provided to the City. Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department when the first building permit application is submitted to Building and Safety. Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED �i �_�f`.hlP,us=1'���p��;GCO'.';v1-DD'",;=: u Sr R?t�3RC''„J�•�7��^St�+C��d 10•lD doC Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Fire Construction Services STANDARD CONDITIONS December 6, 2005 Mountain View Estates SWC Archibald and Victoria St SUBTT17444 and DRC2005-00250 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply 1. Design guidelines for Fire Hydrants: The following provides design guidelines for the spacing and location of fire hydrants: a. The maximum distance between fire hydrants in single-family residential projects is 500-feet. No portion of the exterior wall facing the addressed street shall be more than 250-feet from an approved fire hydrant. For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 200-feet. b. Fire hydrants are to be located. The preferred locations for fire hydrants are: i. At the entrance(s) to a commercial, industrial or residential project from the public roadways. ii. At intersections. iii. On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible. iv. As required by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs of the Fire District. V. A minimum of forty-feet(40') from any building. FSC-2 Fire Flow 1. The required fire flow for this project is 1,500 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch. This requirement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances. 2. Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed project may be used to provide the required fire flow subject to Fire District review and approval. Private fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow. 0 0 3. Firewater plans are required for all projects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site. Building permits will not be issued until firewater plans are approved. 4. On all site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed project site. FSC-4 Requirement for an Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Ordinance 15, the 2001 California Fire Code and/or any other applicable standards require an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed in: 1. All structures that do not meet Fire District access requirements (see Fire Access). 2. When required fire flow cannot be provided due to inadequate volume or pressure. FSC-6 Fire District Site Access Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as private roads, streets drive aisles and/or designated fire lanes. Please reference the RCFPD Fire Department Access— Fire Lanes Standard 9-7. 1. Specifications for private Fire District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are: a. The minimum unobstructed width is 26-feet. b. The maximum inside turn radius shall be 20-feet. c. The minimum outside turn radius shall be 46-feet. d. The minimum radius for cul-de-sacs is 45-feet. e. The minimum vertical clearance is 14-feet, 6-inches. f. At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20-feet on each side. g. The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9-degrees or 20 percent. h. The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12%. L Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight(GVW). j. Trees and shrubs planted adjacent to the fire lane shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14-feet, 6-inches from the ground up. Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fire Department apparatus. 2. Residential gates installed across Fire District access roads shall be installed in accordance with RCFPD Residential Gate Standard #9-1. The following design requirements apply: 2 0 a. All automatic gates shall be provided with a Fire District approved, compatible traffic pre-emption device. The devices shall be digital. Analog devices are not acceptable. Devices shall be installed in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions and specifications. b. Vehicle access gates shall be provided with an approved Fire District Knox Key Switch. c. The key switch shall be located outside and immediately adjacent to the gate for use in the event that the traffic pre-emption device fails to operate. d. A traffic loop device must be installed to allow exiting from the complex. e. The gate shall remain in the open position for not less than 20-minutes and shall automatically reset. 3. Fire Lane Identilfication: Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes. A site plan illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be included in the architectural plans submitted to B&S for approval. 4. Approved Fire Department Access: Any approved mitigation measures must be clearly noted on the site plan. A copy of the approved Alternative Method application, if applicable, must be reproduced on the architectural plans submitted to B&S for plan review. FSC-9 Single-family Residential Sales Model homes require approved Fire District vehicle access and water supply from a public or private water main system before construction. FSC-13 Alternate Method Application Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal will review all requests for alternate method, when submitted. The request must be submitted on the Fire District "Application for Alternate Method"form along with supporting documents and payment of the $92 review fee. FCS-14 Map Recordation I. Reciprocal Access Agreement: The plan as submitted indicate that the required Fire Department access: a. Is located on property which is not under the control of the applicant; or b. Crosses a property line; or C. Is shared by multiple owners; or d. is located on common space under the control of an owner's association Please provide a permanent access agreement granting irrevocable use of the property to the Fire District. The agreement shall include a statement that no obstruction, gate, fence, building or other structure shall be placed within the dedicated access without Fire District approval. The recorded agreement shall include a copy of the site plan. The agreement shall be presented to Fire Construction Services for review and approval, prior to 0 0 C recordation. The agreement shall be recorded with the Recorder's Office, County of San Bernardino. To assist Fire Construction Services in reviewing the agreement the following shall be included in the submittal: a. The current title reports to provide a legal description and proof of ownership for all properties included in the agreement. b. The assessor's parcel numbers of each parcel subject to the agreement. C. A scaled site plan showing the path of the Fire District access, the width, turn radii and slope of roadway surface shall be provided. The access roadway shall comply with the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard#9-7. 2. Reciprocal Water Covenant and Agreement: The plans as submitted indicate that a required private fire mains or appurtenances a. Pass through or are located on property not under the control of the applicant; or b. Crosses a property line; or C. Provide service to adjacent properties; or d. Is located on common space under the control of an owner's association; or e. Is shared by multiple owners. Please provide a permanent maintenance and service agreement between the owner for the private water mains, fire hydrants and fire protection equipment essential to the water supply. The agreement shall meet the form and content approved by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District. The agreement shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services for review and approval, prior to recordation. The agreement shall be recorded within the Recorder's Office, County of San Bernardino. FCS-15 Annexation of the parcel map: Annexation of the parcel map into the Community Facilities District#85-1 is required prior to the issuance of grading or building permits. Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS — Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: 1. Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire District. Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District Standards. Approval of the on-site (private) fire underground and water plans is required prior to any building permit issuance-for any structure on the site. Private on-site combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed in accordance with RCFPD Standards# 9-8 and#10-4. The Building & Safety Division and Fire Construction Services will perform plan checks and inspections. 4 0 0 All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. Fire construction Services will inspect the installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 2. Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and CCWD. On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the project. Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure Standard#9-8 and#104. All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing. Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CCWD. Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped, 3. Construction Access: The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7. All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14'6" above the finished surface of the road. 4. Fire Flow: A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received. The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services. 5. Easements and Reciprocal Agreements: All easements and agreements must be recorded with the County of San Bernardino. 6. Annexations: To the San Bernardino County Fire Department must be completed. PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The building construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction Services' "Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures". PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION — Please complete the following: 1. Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers". On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location. 2. Private Fire Hydrants: For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, in the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on-site fire hydrants. The underground fire line contractor, developer and/or owner are responsible for hiring the company to perform the test. A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services verifying the fire flow available. The fire flow available must meet or exceed the required fire flow in accordance with the California Fire Code. 3. Fire Sprinkler System: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services, 5 0 4. Fire Sprinkler Monitoring: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler monitoring system must be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services, The fire sprinkler monitoring system shall be installed, tested and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system (subject to the release of power). 5. Fire Suppression Systems and/or other special hazard protection systems shall be inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services before occupancy is granted and/or equipment is placed in service. 6. Fire Alarm System: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire alarm system shall be installed, inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. 7. Access Control Gates: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehicular gates must be inspected, tested and accepted in accordance with RCFPD Standards#9-1 by Fire Construction Services. B. Fire Access Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services. 9. The CC&R's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the required annual inspections and the maintenance of all required fire access roadways, 10. Address: Prior to the granting of occupancy, single-family dwellings shall post the address with minimum 4-inch numbers on a contrasting background. The numbers shall be internally or externally illuminated during periods of darkness. The numbers shall be visible from the street. When building setback from the public roadway exceeds 100-feet, additional 4-inch numbers shall be displayed at the property entry. 11. Address: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, commerciallindustrial and multi-family buildings shall post the address with minimum B-inch numbers on contrasting background, visible from the street and electrically illuminated during periods of darkness. When the building setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street, an additional non- illuminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property entrance. Larger address numbers will be required on buildings located on wide streets or built with large setbacks in multi-tenant commercial and industrial buildings. The suite designation numbers and/or letters shall be provided on the front and back of all suites. 12. Hazardous Materials: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant must demonstrate (in writing from the County) that the facility has met or is meeting the Risk Management Plan (RMP) or Business Emergency/Contingency Plan with the San Bernardino County Fire Department, Hazardous Materials/Emergency Response and Enforcement Division. The applicant must also obtain inspection and acceptance by Fire Construction Services. 13. Confidential Business Occupancy Information: The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form. This form provides contact information for Fire District use in the event of an emergency at the subject building or property. This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Inspector. 6 Z, City of Rancho Cucamonga x. MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION _, The following Mitigated Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2005-00523, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT17444, DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2005-00250. AND MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2005-00522 Public Review Period Closes: October 10, 2007 Project Name: Project Applicant: Creative Design Associates Project Location (also see attached map): Located on the west side of Archibald Avenue and 150 feet north of Monte Vista Street—APN: 0202-131-27. Project Description: A request to change the Development District Map from Medium Residential to Low-Medium Residential to bring the site into conformance with the General Plan Followed by a request to subdivide 2.17 acres for the purpose of developing a 13-unit detached condominium development in the Medium Residential District(8-14 dwelling units per acre),and a request to build a wall 1 foot higher than the 6 foot maximum permitted by the Development Code in order for the residential development project to comply with the City's exterior residential noise standards. Related Files: Tree Removal Permit DRC2005-00521 and Preliminary Review DRC2004-00331 FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency,has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Mitigated Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but: (1) Revisions in the project plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the project, as revised, may have a significant effect on the environment. If adopted,the Mitigated Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. The factual and analytical basis for this finding is included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477- 2847. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the prop ed Miti ated Negative Declaration during the review period. October 10. 2007 Date of Determination Adopted y 0 RESOLUTION NO. 17-91 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,APPROVING TIME EXTENSION DRC2017-00755, A REQUEST TO ALLOW FOR A ONE (1) YEAR TIME EXTENSION OF A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP (SUBTT17444) RELATED TO A 13-UNIT CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT ON 2.17 ACRES OF LAND IN THE LOW MEDIUM (LM) DISTRICT (4 TO 8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND 150 FEET NORTH OF MONTE VISTA STREET; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0202-131-27, 61 AND 62. A. Recitals. 1. Golden Avenue Development, Inc. filed an application for the extension of the approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map Time Extension request is referred to as "the application." 2. On October 10, 2007, this Commission adopted Resolution No. 07-59, thereby approving the application subject to specific conditions and time limits. 3. A State allowed extension (per SS 1185) extended the approval period 1-year to October 10, 2011. 4. A State allowed extension (per AB 333) extended the approval period 2-years to October 10, 2013. 5. A State allowed extension (per AB 208) extended the approval period 2-years to October 10, 2015. 6. A State allowed extension (per AB 116) extended the approval period 2-years to October 10, 2017; 7. On November 8, 2017, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 8. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on November 8, 2017, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: 0 0 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-91 TIME EXTENSION DRC2017-00755—GOLDEN AVENUE DEVELOPMENT, INC. November 8, 2017 Page 2 a. The application applies to a 2.17 acre parcel of land located the west side of Archibald Avenue and 150 feet north of Monte Vista Street; and b. The property is within the Low Medium (LM) District (4 to 8 dwelling units per acre). To the north and west is a mobile home park (Chaparral Heights) in the Low Medium (LM) District(4 to 8 dwelling units per acre); to the east is single-family development in the Low Medium District (4 to 8 dwelling units per acre); and: to the south is single-family development in the Medium (M) District (8 to 14 dwelling units per acre); and C. The subdivision of the project site conforms to all applicable development standards of the Development Code for the Low Medium (LM) District; and d. This application is a request to extend the approval period of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444 for one (1) additional year. The time extension is necessary to allow time for the completion of a City sponsored storm drain project that will eliminate an Engineering Department requirement to construct an enlarged on-site storm drain system to carry storm water from the west and north of the project site, 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The previously approved tentative tract map is consistent with the City's current General Plan, specific plans, Ordinances, plans, codes, and policies. The proposed project is for the subdivision of 2.17 acres of land for condominium purposes for the construction of a 13-unit multi-family development. The project site is within the Low Medium (LM) District which permits the construction of multi-family development; and b. The site is physically suitable for the type and density of the proposed subdivision. The project site is surrounded by residential development of similar or greater intensity and is well suited for the proposed development; and C. The proposed subdivision, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. An initial study was prepared for the original project that was approved by the Planning Commission on October 10, 2017, along with a Mitigated Negative Declaration, which reviewed potential environmental impacts created by the construction and operation of 13 multi-family units on the project site. Mitigation measures were included in the original approval reducing any potential impact to less than significant. A biological resource update letter (Recon; ,tune 7, 2017) was submitted as part of the request for the time extension. The letter verifies that no native habitat types occur on-site and no federally listed species were observed or are expected to occur on the project site due to lack of suitable native habitats, level of disturbance that has occurred to the site and development of surrounding lands; and d. The proposed subdivision complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. The proposed subdivision complies all development standards outlined in the Development Code for multi-family projects within the Low Medium (LM) District; and e. The extension is within the time limits established by State law and local ordinance. State law allows for one (1) year time extensions. 0 i PLANNING COMMISSION r<ESOLUTION NO. 17-91 TIME EXTENSION DRC2017-00755—GOLDEN AVENUE DEVELOPMENT, INC. November 8, 2017 Page 3 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the application, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in connection with the review and approval of this application based upon the following findings and determinations: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration on October 10, 2007 in connection with the City's approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project unless: (i) substantial changes are proposed to the project that indicate new or more severe impacts on the environment; (ii) substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the project was previously reviewed that indicate new or more severe environmental impacts; or (iii) new important information shows the project will have new or more severe impacts than previously considered; or(iv) additional mitigation measures are now feasible to reduce impacts or different mitigation measures can be imposed to substantially reduce impacts. b. The Planning Commission finds, in connection with Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444, that substantial changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project have not occurred which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. The biological resource update letter dated June 7, 2017, concludes that no direct or indirect impact to federal listed species are anticipated from the project or the related tentative map time extension_ The application is for a one (1) year time extension of a previously approved tentative tract map with no proposed changes to the scope of the original approval. Staff further finds that the project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration, not have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less than significant. C. Based on these findings and all evidence in the record, the Planning Commission concurs with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is required pursuant to CEQA in connection with the City's consideration of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3 and 4 above, this Commission hereby grants a time extension. The new expiration date for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444 is October 10, 2018_ 6 All applicable Conditions of Approval in Resolution No. 07-59 and incorporated Standard Conditions in Resolution 07-59 for SUBTT17444 shall apply to Time Extension DRC2017-00755, except for Engineering Department Condition of Approval 5a,which is no longer applicable and the addition of the following Condition of Approval: If the applicant for this project chooses to wait for the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct a public storm drain system and remove the proposed project from the flood plain as determined by FEMA, the applicant shall as a condition of approval for the project accept all remaining off-site storm water flows from the adjacent upstream property(ies). The storm water flows shall be conveyed through the project as a privately maintained storm drain system and shah connect to a public storm drain system in Archibald Avenue. The inlet system to intercept the off-site storm drain flows shall be a privately maintained curb type catch basin within the project boundary. All off-site improvements shall be coordinated with the adjacent property owner(s). 0 t PLANNING CONIjMISSIOjN ,;ESOLUTION NO. 17-91 TIME EXTENSION DRC2017-00755—GOLDEN AVENUE DEVELOPMENT, INC. November 8, 2017 Page 4 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2017. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: _7 Francisco Oaxaca, Chairman ATTEST: Cj Candy]g Burnett Secretary 1, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of November 2017, by the following vote-to-wit- AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FLETCHER. MACIAS, NIUNOZ, OAXACA NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: WIMBERLY ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: NONE STAFF REPORT PLANIINNGDEPARIMENI' Date: February 11, 2015 RANCHO To: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission CilCAMONGA From: Candyce Burnett, Planning Director By: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner Subject: DESIGN REVIEW DRC2013-00583 - Creative Design Associates - Site plan and architectural review of a 13 unit detached condominium project on 2.17 acres in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for a site located on the west side of Archibald Avenue and 150 feet north of Monte Vista Street - APN: 202-131-27, 61 and 62. Related Files: Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00942, Minor Exception DRC2013- 00941 and Minor Exception DRC2014-00358. On October 10, 2007, a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts was adopted by the Planning Commission for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444. The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects or minor revisions to projects within the scope of the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2013-00941 - Creative Design Associates - A request to allow 7 foot high walls along Archibald Avenue for noise attenuation in connection with Design Review DRC2013-00583 for the site plan and design review of a 13 unit detached condominium project on 2.17 acres in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District(4-8 dwelling units per acre) for a site located on the west side of Archibald Avenue and 150 feet north of Monte Vista Street-APN: 202-131-27, 61 and 62. Related Files: Design Review DRC2013- 00583, Minor Exception DRC2014-00358 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00942. On October 10, 2007, a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts was adopted by the Planning Commission for Tentative Tract Map SUB71717444. The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects or minor revisions to projects within the scope of the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2014-00358 - Creative Design Associates - A request for up to 8 foot high walls in the private areas separating Units 11/12 and Units 10113 and between the project site and the Mobile Home Park to the west due to a two foot grade difference in connection with Design Review DRC2013-00583 for the site plan and design review of a 13 unit detached condominium project on 2.17 acres in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for a site located on the west side of Archibald Avenue and 150 feet north of Monte Vista Street-APN: 202-131-27, 61 and 62, Related Files: Design Review DRC2013-00583, Minor Exception DRC2014-00941 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2013- 00942. On October 10, 2007, a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts was adopted by the Planning Commission for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444. The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects or minor revisions to projects within the scope of the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. EXHIBIT D i+-- a eR PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2013-00583, DRC2013-00941, DRC2013-00942&DRC2014-00358 CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES FEBRUARY 11, 2015 Page 2 TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2013-00942 - Creative Design Associates - A request to remove 45 trees in connection with a Design Review (DRC2013-00583) for a site plan and design review of a 13 unit detached condominium project on 2.17 acres in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for a site located on the west side of Archibald Avenue and 150 feet north of Monte Vista Street -APN: 202-131-27, 61 and 62. Related Files: Design Review DRC2013-00583, Minor Exception ORC2014-00941 and Minor Exception DRC2014-00358. On October 10, 2007, a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts was adopted by the Planning Commission for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444. The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects or minor revisions to projects within the scope of the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Development Review DRC2013-00583, Minor Exception DRC2013-00941, Minor Exception DRC2014-00358 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00942 though the adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval with Conditions. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Project Density: 6 dwelling units per acre B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Mobile Home Park- Low Medium (LM) Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) South - Single-Family Residential—Medium (M) Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) East - Multi-Family Residential - Medium (M) Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) West - Mobile Home Park- Low Medium (LM) Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) C, General Plan Designations Project Site - Low Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) North - Low Residential (2-4) dwelling units per acre) South - Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) East - Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) West - Low Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) D. Project Background: The project was previously approved on October 10, 2007, however, the applicant did not request a Time Extension or pull permits within 5 years of approval. As such, the Design Review entitlement expired on October 10, 2012. The related Tentative Tract Map (SUBTT17444) has not expired because of multiple extensions approved by the State Legislature. The original project approval also included a Development District Amendment 1+=m r—;7 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2013-00583, DRC2013-00941, DRC2013-00942&DRC2014-00358 CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES FEBRUARY 11, 2015 Page 3 (DRC2005-00523), which was reviewed and approved by the City Council on November 11, 2007, changing the Development District Map from Medium (M) Residential to Low Medium (LM) Residential to bring the site into conformance with the General Plan. The basic layout and building footprints of the proposed project are similar to the originally approved project. The applicant has reversed the floor plans on a number of units, the pad elevations have been slightly adjusted to comply with current Building Code and WQMP requirements, and the architectural elevations have been updated to reflect current design criteria. E. Site Characteristics: The 2.17 acre site slopes gently to the southeast and contains 45 trees of various species and the remnants of a stone-lined drainage channel. A Phase Il Cultural Resource Significance Assessment (Michael Brandman Associates; October 31, 2006) submitted for the original project concluded that the project site is not considered eligible for listing as an historic resource or landmark status at either the local or State levels. The adjacent mobile home park has an open storm drain which currently surface drains across the site and enters the public storm drain system at the southern boundary of the site, which will be undergrounded as part of the project. The approved Tentative Tract Map (SUBTT17444) includes conditions of approval requiring a reciprocal access easement with the mobile home park that borders the project site to the north and west and for the construction of a new traffic light at Archibald Avenue and Victoria Street. The new signalized intersection necessitates relocating the main entrance to the mobile home park and making a number of other site changes to their parking lot. The changes include landscaping the existing entrance to the mobile park which is being eliminated, relocating parking spaces (total number will not change), relocating a shuffle board court and installing a landscaped traffic island to prevent traffic conflicts between the project site and the mobile home park. The applicant and the property owner of the mobile home park have entered into a legal agreement outlining the on-site improvements to be made to the mobile home park. The proposed improvements are also shown on the attached plans (Exhibit "A") and the project will not be approved for occupancy prior to completion of all the improvements shown on the plans. ANALYSIS: A. E ERAL; The applicant proposes to construct 13 detached condominiums on 2.17 acres of vacant land. The proposed density is 6 dwelling units per acre, which Is in the middle of the Low-Medium Residential range of 4-8 dwelling units per acre. The project is designed to conform to the development standards outlined in the Optional Development Standards of the Development Code for the Low-Medium Residential District. The units Have a minimum 15-foot side-to-side setback and exceed the required 30 foot front-to-front setback. The project provides 46 percent of private and common open space area in excess of the minimum 45 percent open space requirement. The project will be gated and includes sidewalks that provide connections to the common open space areas and to the front entrance i+om r_r2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2013-00583, DRC2013-00941, DRC2013-00942&DRC2014-00358 CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES FEBRUARY 11, 2015 Page 4 and public sidewalk along Archibald Avenue. The project also includes a secondary emergency vehicle access along Archibald Avenue with a manual sliding gate. The common Open space amenities include two covered picnic tables with BBQ units, a tot lot and two open play areas. Private open space is included along the sides (minimum 5 and 10 feet) and rear of each unit (minimum 15 feet). An attached two-car garage is provided with each unit in addition to 11 guest parking spaces, 6 parking spaces over the minimum requirement. The garages and front doors are accessed from the private street that runs through the project. The project includes 3 plans — 2, two-story models and 1, one-story model. The two-story models will each have two elevation types (Spanish and cottage) and range in size from 1,697 to 2,145 square feet. The single-story model will have one elevation type (Spanish) and Is 1,792 square feet. B. MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2 13-00941: The project includes an application for a Minor Exception to construct a 7-foot high perimeter wall along Archibald Avenue and wrapping around Unit 9. The project site is within an area with noise levels exceeding City standards according to General Plan Figure PS-9. An acoustical analysis was completed for the originally approved project and concluded that with a 7-foot high perimeter wall along Archibald Avenue and wrapping around Unit 9, the project would comply with the City's residential noise standards. The wall is also a required mitigation measure included in the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the related tentative tract map. The wall will be constructed of split-face bock with stone veneer columns. The findings of fact below support the necessary findings, which are required by the City's Development Code: Fact: The Minor Exception is consistent with the General Plan or any applicable specific plan or Development Agreement. Finding: The proposed increase in wall height along the eastern project boundary is necessary to comply with the General Plan Goal PS-13 to minimize the impacts of excessive noise levels and General Plan Policy PS-1 3-3 to consider the use of noise barriers or walls to reduce noise levels generated by ground transportation. The increased wall height will reduce the onsite noise levels to be in compliance with City regulations. Fact: The proposed development is compatible with existing and proposed land uses in the surrounding area. Finding: The proposed project is compatible with the surrounding land uses in that the project site is within the Low Medium (LM) Residential District, which permits the development of single and multi-family residences. Additionally, there is residential development to the north, south and west of the project site and to the east across Archibald Avenue. Noise attenuation walls over the permitted height limit occur throughout the City along major streets. Itam r-Fa PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2013-00583, DRC2013-00941, DRC2013-00942& DRC2014-00358 CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES FEBRUARY 11, 2015 Page 5 Fact: The proposed exception to the specific development standard(s) is necessary to allow creative design solutions compatible with the desires of the community and/or to accommodate unique site conditions. Finding: The project is located along a major street which increases the onsite noise levels in excess of City regulations. The increased wall height will permit the project to comply with City noise attenuation requirements and provide a pleasing street scene. The proposed wall will be constructed of decorative block and the area between the wall and the public right-of-way will be landscaped to soften the appearance of the wall. Fact: The granting of the Minor Exception will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district, and will not be detrimental to public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious properties or improvements in the vicinity. Finding: It is common practice to approve Minor Exceptions for wall height in order to mitigate excessive noise levels for projects adjacent to major streets. The increased wall height will not negatively impact properties in the vicinity as the wall will be required to have a decorative finish and landscaping which will soften the appearance of the extra wall height. C. MINOR,EXCEPTION ORC2014-00358: The project also includes an application for up to 8-foot high walls in the private yard areas separating Units 11/12 and Units 10/13 and between the project site and the Mobile Home Park to the west. The extra wall height is necessary because of up to 2-foot grade difference at the subject locations. The walls will be constructed of tan block and will have a split-face finish where it Is not located within a private open space area. The findings of fact below support the necessary findings, which are required by the City's Development Code: Fact: The Minor Exception is consistent with the General Plan or any applicable specific plan or Development Agreement. Finding: The proposed Increase in wall height due to a grade difference between adjacent private yard areas and neighboring projects is consistent with the residential nature of the Development District in which the site is located. The additional wall height will provide privacy and security between the adjacent yard areas and neighboring project sites. Fact: The proposed development Is compatible with existing and proposed land uses in the surrounding area. Finding: The proposed project is compatible with the surrounding land uses in that the project site is within the Low Medium (LM) Residential District, which permits the development of single and multi-family residences. Additionally, there is residential development to the north, south and west of the project site and to the east across Archibald Avenue. Wail heights over fi feet are common where there is a grade difference between adjacent yard areas and neighboring project sites. Itam r—FS PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2013-00583, DRC2013-00941, DRC2013-00942 &DRC2014-00358 CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES FEBRUARY 11, 2015 Page 6 Fact: The proposed exception to the specific development standard(s) Is necessary to allow creative design solutions compatible with the desires of the community and/or to accommodate unique site conditions. Finding: There is an approximately 2-foot grade difference between adjacent private yards area and project sites. The additional wall height will allow residents to secure their private yard areas with a minimum 6-foot high wall. Fact: The granting of the Minor Exception will not constitute a grant of special privilege Inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classed in the same district, and will not be detrimental to public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious properties or improvements In the vicinity. Finding: It is common practice to approve Minor Exceptions for wall height within the residential districts when there is a grade difference between adjacent yard areas and project sites. The additional wall height will only be visible to the residents living directly adjacent to the walls and will not negatively impact other property owners in the area. D. TREE REMOVAL PERMIT ORC2013-00942: The applicant has submitted a request to remove 45 trees in order to accommodate the development of the site. An Arborist Report was prepared on May 17, 2005, which surveyed the site and found a total of 45 trees that qualify as Heritage Trees under the City's Tree Preservation Ordinance. Of these trees, all but 6 trees have been recommended for removal due to their poor condition. The required grading and site layout prevent preserving the 6 healthy trees. The Development Code requires that new developments plant 40 trees per acre of which 90-percent must be 15-gallon size trees and 10-percent must be 24-Inch box size trees. The Landscape Plan includes 92 new trees, 5 trees in excess of the minimum requirement, of which 43 percent will be 24-inch box size trees. E. DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE. The project was reviewed and approved as presented by the Design Review Committee (Oaxaca and Granger) on June 3, 2014. F. GRADING AND TECHNICAL. REVIEW COMMITTEES. The project was reviewed and approved as presented by the Grading and Technical Review Committees on June 3, 2014 G. NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING: The applicant held a neighborhood meeting on June 11, 2014 to discuss the proposed project. Property owners within 660 feet of the project site were notified of the meeting and approximately 30 residents were in attendance. The following issues were raised at the meeting: • Traffic flow between the mobile home park and the relocated traffic light. • Drainage issues between the mobile home park and the proposed development. • Double wail Issues between the mobile home park and the proposed development. The applicant explained to the residents that they will work with the owner of the mobile home park to resolve any issues that arise due to the relocated traffic light. The project engineer ftpm r-FF PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2013-00583, DRC2013-00941, DRC2013-00942&DRC2014-00358 CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES FEBRUARY 11, 2015 Page 7 explained that all offsite drainage flows will be collected and directed to a new underground drainage facility which will connect to the existing storm drain on Archibald Avenue. The applicant explained that where ever double wails exist, the existing wall will be removed. Since the neighborhood meeting, the applicant and the owner of the mobile home park have negotiated changes to the flow of traffic on the mobile home site and updated plans have been submitted to the City. The changes include adding a traffic control island directly adjacent to the entrance to the new project, which separates the traffic exiting each project. The changes were coordinated with the Engineering, Traffic and Building Departments and each of these departments have approved the new design. With these changes, all issues raised at the neighborhood meeting have been resolved. H. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. Staff required the applicant to post a large 4-foot by 8- foot Notice of Filing sign on the property, which was also used to post the City's public hearing notice. I. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration on October 10, 2007 in connection with the City's approval of SUBTT17444. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project unless: (i) substantial changes are proposed to the project that indicate new or more severe Impacts on the environment; (ii) substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the project was previously reviewed that indicates new or more severe environmental Impacts; or (Ili) new important information shows the project will have new or more severe impacts than previously considered; or (iv) additional mitigation measures are now feasible to reduce impacts or different mitigation measures can be imposed to substantially reduce impacts. Staff has evaluated original approval and concludes that substantial changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project have not occurred which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated In the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. The general layout and number of units have not changed from the original environmental determination. Staff further finds that the project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration, not have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less than significant. The project layout, design and associated environmental impacts have not changed from the original environmental determination and therefore, pursuant to CEQA, staff recommends that the Planning Commission concur with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is required in connection with the City's consideration of Development Review DRC2013-00583, Minor Exception DRC2013-00941, Minor Exception DRC2014-00358 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00942. A copy of the approved Mitigated Monitoring Program and Mitigation Monitoring Checklist for Tentative Map SUBTT17444 are attached (Exhibit"C"). PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2013-00583, DRC2013-00941, DRC2013-00942& DRC2014-00358 CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES FEBRUARY 11, 2015 Page 8 Respectfully sub ' ed, Candyce Bumeft Planning Director CB:TVIIs Attachments: Exhibit A - Complete Set of Plans Exhibit B - Design Review Committee Action Agenda dated June 3, 2014 Exhibit C - Mitigated Monitoring Program & Mitigation Monitoring Checklist for Tentative Map SUBTT17444 Draft Resolution of Approval for Design Review ORC2013-00583 Draft Resolution of Approval for Minor Exception DRC2013-00941 Draft Resolution of Approval for Minor Exception DRC2014-00358 Draft Resolution of Approval for Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00942 I,___ r r^ E8S00'cM ONO 0allaMIN) OU � a NOONIQfiECR�S3NUD J s i lN Ift = ti jazi !PCs a ��s•• e�a�a� 3 a 4 � I ° 'tfts$ N O Ln 1--4� N I roryr rrnrt� R, d ` I LU '_ z ciiSIM • 7I • � arrrarror roTi r q � W r ■ Fa�yb,1 e7�r�raw _ Ui wogs f - �r ray ❑ { ,_ , , ❑ LU a �' ~ �J as �Z 'y � '• LLLlll • •• - I =1 r • Ole cl '.•.•: EXHIBIT A _ _ �w NOLL]Ri1Z5N07 � � F" h - Y NO SMISM3N) to �ll�jjj'3; t� i=S .I � . ;ia■tt•rt � t _ ; i t�t tiEllEit !� r� t`� 99�i 11i� tty��i � r l 11 f}} a S � r • F _ 1 k ' i + . _ r er rry urn'w nrnr.r r � .1 3 r t�• jL ac 1 ♦ h f h h+i h + { ♦ + 1 1 r L, ;• G + +` + « + + i £8So0-86oz ova 0311si Ma" No NotLonvlskw 9 _ + + + + + + + + 4 t + t + + F+++ + + i — —' _---^'—_ � , � S .�� a�• r"— h to t t i # Y� �� � � � 9 � / •� t t •' � ,ter�.�. � } t. t t*•1 t + py t ey■ 1I� ti+ a B '• Y'.J 1 F + ` � ; ` P - r+Ti,T-T+r _ y t P � # il 6l N v t + + + + f + 0 gi 33 + pION- -———-------._..—.---.----- _ CD/A ASSOCIATES waaf.�r Ka„_. .. 4wrw•nrr 1I••r�.t1� irwKWti.�� .� Esoan rr.\ 14 tn ry-. ENR RESOURi=LLC x r.r..r,.a w• ......w.rw. ARC111B.•iLD -11'L, x o u a .rwou co .:..:.:?v:it• r..��rx to n u. 4 am �� �� y w a O ' ..... Ir J nrrA i nra r ran n m •r e K It fifer U[ Ir Fw UKTJ f■arf • ti ,`• 'e• 2 w..Sti RW■ •1 T k B �� lir Acs Pim WaLr m rIt a .. ir'SN wr � e '• � FM LME r• Nam•atuwnorw.afarrar rf.r.,..,�-. r1�1 - � IrEfIlFmw.+�rf.rnrary hw i�Mw 1 I )/ _ � WOdafrM4Wn1�LVMl•�wl / ��• � I /q W7■IY��fKThl/.C/wHalt�l q��. ~µme~� r if 1 �rboip�Ow[f Mna Waf l! r� \ rrRlNmdrl�arY[YtaM.Y�[ nn r nr■ar n nrr r: ra�.nurwra.araawure■w ' . w r um MIT uwr. neYnna.nan �Djr't �� ■ a fraw m ftr a .aeopa 1A-,• �r ■��ar/aa•r[fustuwa j��s. .,•`SA1 r:.2i • Mwrarr�.rear uewnnf.w.a ate. . awurBfa®nwawt Ate. w... a LUMWW�QMft r rA AJCi « ID�oo!ro+■► a M/a1{rrt qlo YlfVfrl6NE/!■{Id L A'LS ixg;al'.Kllif re it. a se■r.■�a •�+■� IOTA PART r. uma■cf■■awrnca■arMYnoF FIREACCESSPLAN ® r�rfrmrnnowo\vm SCAM raver N AS-103 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA :la W MOUNTAIN VIEW ESTATES TENTATIVE TRACT NEAP 174" T■; � FOR CONDOMINIUMS PURPOSES k r1a+I,Hf�vaR ry r.+m•I f A.Fr uvrw a lr•:�waw�rlai:ry I.r .a�wx r„r r Wd.,n ew•n _ ._ + .. -' -,v :., 4 �ri.rlwiu y l�.•r r rare r rr _ werrr r � �Irueiroa .•r' •mse r i r+•e w r rt nr dur•u•r,orr.me.r,. r .�-- -1 .I f •,' • ' ^.�� � � �rrrer�•.r..a..�+°�°r'raww ` .1 , ��� •r .. I i•. 1 �- "�►'.• � '�! � r.�m�,�•r�'w.iur w�.a w'ws�a°i.s vs f r _1 �.1 •••.. •*.: •�: s- • ra.rwrs�ir.t• t ie`�ryrvr s�ra. -4 1 ram. .I �-{-----■r ---�T� �-- v .__ � e•4rw.s IM f.• w f - - - -/• ^^�±. -'l +'G -C 1-• w�..�Y.a.�Wg Iu+r i161.f.Mt•�1E�t1�s i UNIr9 1 1 � rr� .' � �%: � y+�.rns�f�••r�.re.aws�.wr.�ir' \ J•4 1 rI I _ ". , • 'is 1' l +w rrrwwefla.rlr Pe•rww r• -rl..�a � •� :-� •;r-• �y;�'K-�, �i o a 1. '�,�'i:�� i �'.f Ixl..r,w.vss•a rar les►ew usl UNIT 11'�;� 1 ..'4- . +� �' •I raw•wo:..i r x er laa.rr ra1 r r . I I•. r \1 1 k Y t I •r er,l/Iw•Mn rues r.rr yu4r jrl I{ y 'a `\ � � r.. I ''•-. ! �1 '-�.1_.'*+ ' I ' r�YKmw•r�.4rrr 1 �1 i -ti�..� -J---- ------ - .• • f.�141 • •■ 1 IiC 1 I .Ye bi Mwb�rlfP o[ A..4 r ., s�• - a•.. - 'y' I !, 6NIT•3 r 1# ',� •r r...a rM • i . UNIT 13 - \ 17r { E' S' !-i :rr•t.r.� � i I 3': •IS`. I _r,� LOT 1; ,t.:..ri..• ..w'- 1' n r°u.,�:'�r'u 4.... :e.nr \ � � rw ..r ."__ ` rs•.wnrlrrnwwwxawrr I' . - 1 11 w erwte rea l.rn e+P r K ue.ww w I�r 1 i+ "� aUHIT Z 1 a'ws nir� rx°`.m.a`rerul _„-I; . a ■ .<. Vr '• ` 1 , I r .w•r wwnwn.r re wwrwrr[ua "Rpm-". IL ' r 1 ' J '� �1 I •,.� . -'.� `',-. i�,, * 11r7M•llr Y � 1 w`I a � 1 ♦ '� I Yam' ram.- -�,�' !PNIT.3 . er I'UIJI�B} U� Ir I UNITT ~. i •�.- . I I 1 F -t ..."_yRwl .•r,.e N., :ew_.rrr�i"°I - k ��,� � tt� � \\� `t - - _ I 4 � ' i e1 :ar,.°a'atl..+rw n ir•o�.wr otwlr. w•wl~ T IdY,1�rwv ' 1 _I RrK rrtr rd W 1 " j1 i• I rr •ONtl r,rwe ru �-_ NP+M• 1 I 1' I al lu ww•uc M, w> 41wY ma 0 A6QI.rri n11 w.r.a•r•a M •„.•�rw..1•aa ewre•m rlmY ir!•rr•rYi4r N N � N ■ N N �� wa4e M•i rrt.•l afw■e xui ..ras I.r..e ,.r..o.„rm.e.a t 1• 'HI' r4CY•.4.•4 w }rl.i q 1 � -+�,1••,I y�.,'�' �µL- � �.Ilrl �Wj1�� ro4 iw1 1{� t•r aMrr _ \11"`ttt.11111 wMl �w� �"�~�•.��r w• f4iM4 YW.�A IAfl w.r•Ilii. rear r ia�rw• �.Ir�r ew•rrr+ �oalw tww• r•r ar on w r. m.p an< AUOTigNIaCrlemas•ome CIIY0FRIWCJIOCZ1AmQN CHFOWm imW3.tlmtlf ,r,e Wrlr W8W Twlawi■p10jMe .� TEP M7MYWACrMAP r n•^�.aew.hr Ir•y • s r �p���ay.�•r�r� IAlre M.M/14 qRM ~ w IRA ■rC .1M IW Ia a11•■•IL�■IFrf! R � � A CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ' MOUNTAIN VIEW ESTATESi� CONCEPTUAL. GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN TRACT NO. 17444 ]xI y_ _ w�:.:a ..r";...an_.a.w•..'.: IYSY Ili �.-.r•'i.aiw:r o.... ......... . ' •.�,.� ..w•'i�wr�a�iw• BR.I�Irq ill llNl :�"y r••—..i.�•.W�Wa.r«.w.a.. �waint..•�•�..•u.r �.M.r.:wa �au•ii., wii.r v..y..•r WW.4 w_a 1.� LL r.y Mlw....._.• 11•IM.w. .�Vr+�.w`•.-f r.raV.W S..W. � ilfE � ../�YM.M wIi�•••r•Ynwar Wly I.Hir �yy./wyl.�iaa...•r.... -+..•rU= .w=•r,—••.. 'r WL.Vr t.r'wr.u•M r•..H [..t.rrow YIu[e twe[lon � vR114,/Sf�51 � • .�w�.�m ww��w+ r rw_�_w r':.��.:'w:'•..:. _r 1 r. .r.w.ar.LL. � .�.11•�•••i•L•wr"it��•i�Yw M..•.•wa r••..�lir.�i�r yi.•/.iVa•�na ..�...r � � rIr_.wu�.r ti.=.Yr V= �iM..li.rlr.r...•�• .•...•.a..i w.� h...•-..r BAW1 R6W to�w r�-- �� •_• ��.m,^••—_•1 T/4aP r7l .r-r... ILA„w _r 4V r.i.aQr ., 1�[Ma11f1iitT .•r.Y. a..ia•..., �i •...... Y v. ....ti i._ ss.l.r.ffa-ac�ra+..i n.. i '�S� trip f _ _4♦J Iw Y•^y .,..•Y awr�M .�. IAIw._w[Y.rt • wn.ti l` ' . — .`.^ rgyi r•i�Y ww •.[a.w....- �..i WJ.:L••M • ' - J 1YPICAI ZZ"AW OETAK 1 S •� so AwvkomAe•nP/rALlar a 3 rr O11mISWEt7 ... ltrrrwn.n7VCtRUl�hntin�1=C Md+W!MMrn.n w F•4rn Urrr++1C=W@U014 M%M1414U.Al Aj*.Ipl t SEE SHEET 7 JL ° if QI � _ ; 3• t.r1 ' 114 + ill ;; V — C/L YONTE VISTA sf I 4. . ' 1 { RESIDENCE CONDO SUBDMSON 6' WEST SIPS OF ARCH NALPAVE AT T5O FT OF MONM VISTA ST f� Wd+W lua Wnt7tL I RANCHO CUCAAAONCK CA 111779 3 u ••w +nrr.r•�r u t! =U sw� .�n tau— 4,. .......»....... ..............�.n...,-.»... �'• �.m=snu•w I�1 inn wWh 4�71�1rk4 i�a �r+•� �••w�•�•••�•w...��wru.. �•�uaaa...,v.a �� +} sa'9� PIN a ^ � SUM VZ V NIOMMM OH3PM 1rj_1 /V vm !� ItVIGIAWCMiOUCALIV3AVOWIM?Wd 3MO3CMI rlw)suuosnsoawoomN3aim { 01 r� oil 1 r 44 1. f ` 11 1 .� _ IL fl Na , -7 .r / yq - r -+---------- ---------- --= EB Jill fit I A-- T I 9 Y1 f 1 L i IG O" Yu n(!S n 3Mt E I S+e 1'�rd�[[ 'tti�axn I3 M+MI�M M++r�..�I R�f'P'T]71i+�w�7�111 f1Ci1Q M1V nrrwa•Iwara7nu7a••r,rlry ltL a.rlaaau ar aawnrlvl.,.7nrw u..rccrssucpl..e-s unrim.x.utn+,wwral .. W _ �, :�_"`' '---�' .,. �_«may, .�'_'1 .. _r• • - - 71 !�. 'fie' ' �•t'�r . 1r-•r�.�i.�� �,�, 1 _ ' •I Y s , -- • _ _ � 91 4 +.ram. Lf'A1 Ir + � • •' •1'1.�. r LJ i? i �i T�1p i'tr { � `•. {{rr i l l µ1 7 1 �'.—S._•�'•.ti,1� +�1 •ia•i�4 _ 'If7 •7 13� , }' a .' t• . Y r �;��::;Fl�Sf r,.��,r� 1/. ' � T� •r i7: t t '�-1 6 '� _i _ �. t,�a �-J Yr:2'S�4L �. r.. 7 5_i i• :rt ,ci i .LS 4 r •:-j•�1-1 . T l!~`-7y.•� iT��1'n•;aft irk- ad e• .a.i -,t "�. ��!!II rr •r• � yr � TO1 ' T t'' 5:;1==`t 1Ii�' iIj:F��-� �F#� i`.'•_ • -) Y�! a 1 + •.407. . - •. Sr�.f x,t7� ;, Y'f: . '� r 3 {i rl ,ill [ ,. 7�4 � �[[� 1� � (} S /� Av r7rr LL4! Jr r r`� J. L. IT %14 � � � awl'.�•C).w:- a`r�f-- �.�{ ,'.�s-r=r-�a.�[?S,t�+',, �. "" �' n I +• �' r r � r :_ 1 A' �F..� it _s 213 y7;y ^`4rtlr r "a i + l�+w sue, �`.] 1 -a '1 i` 1• '.� x �fi 1I1�:+'7 a'r• r• ± t= 1'ra S -_i1 oa n t • � �:a#'.�' `'$'fit-f t L r N ! � Q7 a ,h V. r ` R REEMENCE CONVO SUBDIMON Mil alas OF ARCNdALD AVE AT 1 so Fr Of:lsiomM VWA Sr Fo WdrW tarlee'-0rRANCHO CUCA4oNGk CA•lr3s a dDm ist Arm ko n, If nM•laa[,I,rl.4r1A nna W„•flT rar !•n anMln.nn a,a,•carry•ar r� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA I PRELIMINARY WQMP SITE AND DRAINAGE PLAN ld3 TRACT NO. 17444 MOUNTAIN VIEW ESTATESg Yer arw m�w r .��� �•,. ••• _:, .. i' ,- ,lour~' ' "°' ,.iq p rwLw raw�rlYsw�.wyYwr w► wwr �rw � .�� cmt dp J �wrrwww+wwwwa ' LgrinMYi YKhIl�µn I • � • � �� /fin-7at�t�� Y/ • � '� .• �+. �I � - prt]Iq,lW7i ,' �{- YYWiWW"' ti• 1' .'.. ' { - 1 i 1 '► moot P of— fig --•- ,-- �� - � :�' it it �� #�� k - ,i• , is --- I � ' � I ! � ��' ^� j ."���\ JJ. . ' •;ww ate �S �'��� F -� � �w� ,. �, ,- � „ •*fir� ,� _ . t \' f ``ti�'r � ¢a' • M1 ,'}A y � I ,. is�cr<SAMPLE[� rcq iartrtcrw O Co6,rerOt � L ie imYM µC f'[ YL9lY�tll Wl i41[E folua! wow wY•ILmilsUr tterannru to �q � ga1Mtl 'ly/IIM �3-�1 MCYY n__— S-tn.Iarj� tr y�,���' o C � Mltlima¢W M" Y t4 YYY ' ul L If711 YlFltlf �[tiL1/Illr 6I7[[rZF tYt qmm� YYa•p^�6 olWl.W.PIr ftmf•?.Am fl ba,us Aft[v6mliTbt l04 L IYtgNr�fr HOW m .slala,noa Y,f tlrtyrr Yll Y,tYrMY Y,L ft, r�ltt twiYtlwy ,rime IK Iwa ,� a rrac onLY s ItIflilNr. �?a ,rY YYYyw u afmr y - p t4.w..rr./bl IAot • R+� rto,CNa l? g t ' 4m.r uc O rpar.ocirlYa Yr.a rir K w,igfa yrpl trrl /[Y.4 _ YtOd(I 9,Y1 t tN/Qta trO w.vwm w• OOpt rarYarr,Ctl.4-•IYO ST Wj -oft afittowr IYIY tYPtl>•f,af,L s YL LL9 z } IY.Ir Ytop.tf us M W { � 0 b-r;17ilgtr yrar�t .ciQl.rnt.0 wn+trKce�dL+o g�o F 1Q_Il IIOd MOO,IPYG Y0111!011 fE�fY'101 Y KIIIIYr q{ jj Q ura�a91a swu ac twccna uo nc+ro amr.a�oYo __ 0 %-1t,bwuR IrIR11 wnrtY.Ypc a►SirY.t/MW ULl w m[twnl yo r� ��'i1 IIaIL K wY[Crm IYy+3f.rs0 F I,t �w rYrm rdr�,r4llifw no nv w Lu i � ;IC tYa11.1Yt wra OY/Arw/xua n4011EK7 ���'� '�w.r+l �iC S Kai, ftmwc=� 11VFq }� } QI =-/1 Ul0%Mf YMtm,yla i1Yls1 can pd m6�Y:.r q PY•H1L arK 0 Yii[iqa SP4giIC,LIY'Y'L[ Y,n l�Pm./4fa�nwcn.r rotor[ Q %•y.N MMISOC W u[A Y.YKPMM Kir tf Yr gpYpK[lS O Yt WR IO# — PtrYa IGf■ro 0�[tt7tiS YIl r irt►1 � e r'Y. . Hoar Ird•4Mr tgPtt,R.SICIHIO mtwtcrpY m PwMrlt rsYr ware _ 71DYtdt ulagl YID wp Iltl4r 111W ��@�, eY7lwrt t+t tm7Y auw s.F�e! hE lar[ .r+.... FLOY LOW a„� 91E MI4/q r1oE i '1�w.nw.i%t0[l[I>♦7.!•�'I l-�.u"rI L.rMn1.F YwiN1w 11.+A1CG1111KpIweF�"{ILM"A Olt$I pM AA.W F f .. /y t — 4 JIB l �.�•�. - e L -------- � f .l cn A. sp 4 5 SEE SHEET 2 D D X t6r oil ! r = EiE � ? l� tl Yf_ tcb _ { RESIMCE CONDO sUBOIYISON *W SIDE OF AF1MnAWAVE AT 150 FTOF YOWM VMTAST . s1 • t�f tjI[il PMC440 CUCAMONUk CA PtT39 :E,� � `yeR.. .° ," YfO o w I hj � - c _ I I I ® �gpp� CCg�FY`C� d� � FCFCL �L��C2LCCC�CCECf CL�CC � ! I I I ra 2 It I a , ' ! Nor fOR [� +� ¢ • ps CONSTRUCTION _ +a? F;{•-!'.' iuJ I IEw ms x oRc 2013-00583 '� Imo• •' -:�`��.�'.�tr�������:ram��� ��� MR MEW 30 ' A�. ����„���i' ii.,i .�:�� �I� II� C'.tOJO+P:�`O't0'�_,'►`OA:74�.b`�u0006J.o:J.O WWI RIM mm 1151, FW tit, ri , II MEW ® ,.. ill �C�""�„��� � •:,: l�A►�, ~III ,�� ,,A. ��, �, J �:ii�I"ii�. 4" F1 �� ��1♦1�•� •�1••• U�� 1'n�l i .�y.�.I all 3 03 �Fi 1�'oua::oio�on� �' f {L J © RIM 0 \1� IT .- ! ae. PLANTING LEGEND = b TREE i —lj //�� .v..rrrrr,a.�.+.� ■ 1 o ' two cceee.4r.ar.e.e U JICD & n tMe11 LA r.ar br.errha t No 4AK>yri�r �} ® rr Ndd�alAM pr■w1e �oei•� �L TIDE.4 d ■se hamr 7�A: ■.�sNawa V uNff /1 t .Glop■a r.en KtV ur�,r■� l/"11 s kYw crAsaM ; ■� • T a 6�wnA�k1 Pew ' ••�•� Y F.phwlk[almlelA eee s■CrLben plyd ` SHRUB/ACCENT O Rermlry■n'9s""be* S MSsnEdnYYw efb we'Carey enmts teegdd tiara ExtSiING Q -L" w■lcarnn,.MA� t � MgµflWAnhmrd + MOBILE HOME O 14 / CAnmfdu. 1 IOedwC=Owrgp PARK 1Gd polalrn C%sl7n1 — Y s rraartr� �-ry o pn , ME L I S1p PErrrwrn 1nm.lkmtt say a � !r!l l�er�Li1C . I O nm.d raw Q `*+a um i Nr.hound rm. .oaeoea DD"'�'f rY. Gnan..n'JMnsoi s Bw■ n ra.r 1Gy Grne{■A � '4�4 p . y'• Neeoeao Irra.{{erm F lrr4` SGr ue.icvr reeNw Crag Fy►lieg ldl w e . LC Care Tnlaeaa d o u A �. •d. O 4f4ae B M 1An 1 a w�.ea } i u j eel" tee rf a rrrtrttrrl 14 r,,,.w�ae ! i .•'• • Y-G ® resldca anndem to } tef f x Yedcbm eec f i ■ t Ni lrrts td be panted In eare,ercrr roar ' wrr�e�s 2' de.p snrrdded Cedar bam to spread F}m rm 02 Tffim on Imam.t 92 m r bet.ren penl� r0lp�-31r9Lt1Tfiilan Yw alt If ia�lom F MI prarirdcdrrr•areas•hare plants are e•de or prr.ter to ha.e 2 1■ins of prole.t■r rebre;n 2 yrrerrnl , .awm_m■a� pecle.em pret.."e fae.er.nt■urd]'beloe r.a{rvv prase .i �' r+rerWa parr ■boee to rt.wrtr reed pra.en i L-2 . ba�■rA WATER CONSERVATION CONCEPT STATEMENT E room WE- AAnf intsin 1/iww EFtt�)fac rC `K l Wa. 13m .— JK Design& rep.fl:t:r LouTlo+8910.6946 Arrfi)hgld,�}nrho CLTrai+Ifr+ga Ca 91701 Asse ateS.Ine. tug r E asataN k Al -UTE4 �ounrsi YAU IIAMIUM AFFYEO VATM A=WANCE � EMI�'•aLoM (M)IaH OA)Ianl-LANLOW tE=in CA Wd PIA TZAR (00) KFMU EVAMMA4KIMM I v00 FM VtMo 1 ��• a/ LT AU SIYLMT FA M LA TK AREA Cr IK WIDNAPL 3drARE Fmq H2 T![CI M MN►AC=(To e+s sauANt roof) I. CITY HAXIYIaA APPLIED WATER ALLaWANCE UrarA)OR VATER BUDGET. /ot.1 AFM to it lanrrapi m up"r..1 WJ. A— ng473)t(06)x;370)52J LA z a12• +nttf pW„ L ESnYATE3 APFUn VATER USE:(EAWU) II---LTgl71)1 Lft PF(a2)13M )611011 Mn 1 as C---ng47e)r IIE1 M Fri"7- L� 1 af2 t-aA2!• A oalJyr � AAnlMMam Viitr o--1713(47 S1 1 ILo!Frla6) !saLl•at HA .nu . 1 _ wl+y ! Falli4Fs L---Total ESIM104 apoire Vat..We M Ilan.••.ow r.afti 473M o.14" { 8OT1 JIM Amtubdo Cow air.h a non fat...rfr•af.+c.lchAatrd rr tfal f.vra fn lm.Clty L COMM ',M�can F T.W[Ftan.led S Appal tlatr IIt.Ma.n n C o1rl Lr.tlfo r Vr Wm r Ifo"— ay 161r Brp!(YAiA)aho.a a A n arr 4 P.)Ict Ii p— ENR PAsoumn LLC E:470034 CAL/YR ¢ A. 589022 GAL/YR = OK L ' Written/aln CaairryiLiaa Stalaigf:eL• Ilr brw aY/••.a I•.rf.M fr oflf..wY If~ffa rib h+a>w+L- Uft. , } ar rrr nt psi Y Mf pro rr of frea ya�t4 nwrr�M�1 wfa r M1Y w w.fl.a ��( M.i fa Fwua.w.wFor r.iff�f rM r s aryl YrM f►ir 1 Im 119"ffoaa AM ti.aw r-omp".L b 4104 Ifpiq.—l"' , r.n a bYldscW Pgo*o tAp1-•war A—k f bd.ri raa wa+i qWy r r r Mlr rr Iysf ri ! rra�rr f....a-ft A.Y A r-r w'Y ti+M maa,nfs r nlw aafL.w w rT f � L T [ lk w 11/7 m .�._F4frvfd•r• V = fNwr a. WATER CONSERVATION STATEMENT •-Th.4..�vgY...f„,..a„r ra tha Ir�a:v.a ... . SM caapat.Qty fY✓t.rnt:.r>Nt fa+y.1 frfM.IM flwi Irn.si Ytfr tr f:.lnr.lr 11.r•+.++a+atar F } ALL PLAY GROUND EOuIP11ENT AND SURFACE INFO CALL ProDekllnc TEL 816-502-21)1 gip_ uka � FAX:BIB-502^3331 ..alatx.. wSs.fr.uarm 4mG•=. Itfi ltfi r/tl.hYIF-Pf f1 ALL 91LS_ Iaa.f.rKt I frW M rMfr•.rf W.rY tyri C i.....M wM Ilan-r rw•r ./1P mwx-tOrf taaa I QSQfAMiR i 1 o�aco i . �•: me ftrwi mft o.n IMIa v i v a AftA a[. Mi NaIIMMaR -� I Pon mifflymmima ...CI fora-tfsr•.µf • __- `../ POST TO FOOTING } SEE moax 0A~oaM 1 l� OVERHEAD DETAIL lD OVERHEAD DETAIL L-3 rr�+s go mu low Oct } S JE t r •k it ��°��° �� � ;�d��y� 1� ��d �0�' Ix W ,r i pyi't t � ��� � �! �`� , t ���Sj�►����t � >Is•` �• ��1 ��k. i�i !� � i � � � � x , t � 1 . 6�3� IE y� N ti s dtss a9 1 1 9 �E !1 ;p.r t 1 � t• ` !!■it ' g� ; L9 3:8. ���-� . ��CiI �.i�� .�r1lr�lil�lyll�°111T ��.�f� t�l � ������ �AC °�1���� :a}a} 7 � � �� }! �L � �1�3 Mfuiogms, ! 0 0 <D0 L L J•. I L l ■ tB ; ! ILL iJ� rJ rw A:u i� A V O O O it it a< iu g �r • in i f � IL r � f � � 1 �. fl 13I——------------ f L LZ it rl p. y i r{ w rA. ,n,— � 0 00 � • N� b w G N r II � r Q 00 00 r i t >v a /—r�3- r � 1 I 1 rl r —C N-1' Li r r{ r{ { r{ I{ r{ O 1:J O n{ v{ r► r{ r{ rr r r _ 1 Y E •1 •• 1 O f 1 ; 1 IIr +a11 OC 1 L 1 O i e 1 1 � R i Oi 1 I , r{ + O O O O WIN360 ��~ °"c ! ' !E_e e�` •� f �� � EsE i� r���� a I ��a NOT FGR o E F= cofesmucMN OR RECORDING 6 �;n (HEW FILES ORc 2013-00583 F r �"� J 4..f ✓ —"—TI w � I 11 oll°; I `=EIIq ° ,r I _ R I 1 All I i •F i� r� * 1 ; A + � IA 9 I�i 1 � F E�I 1�Is 5 I I - ; •, i i ,. I ! I1i�l1 4 ; lll1 r w� i i � +F 610 lot JLL x � r•-� I r rOR r I'L' ` r GONSTRl CTM a sE OR RECOROIN6 " MF=W FILE rrORC 2013.00583 ) Yt •r r� rwl r r r r r•r 1 aw M 1 { 3 o ® ; Ir Y� a 1 N 1 • r Ir.r 44 azz- Ir rt o o - o 0 Y� Is 14 jrO x jL n Q a amps o at �!1• r ,� •E#E[ ��i91� li H; i � if �! xH=�� �6� �i_lde�t lit i �' ! •j !E!R !�[ 1!t[x p. n Pr d Ix; IL Oki eE R fr is � K ! ■ Ri } 1� If all � �� � . g , • )"a lr ,{■■■ e�le�. 1 x)i, 6 E i s sir i i s a n q rye 3 yw Cb ucriam YiNOT FOR Aft ; OR lip ! .10 RFCORD11tO 1111PPP (NEWFOLEO.ORc2413-0Q5B3) F r #� N I I W N I I I % I I � I 0 w k� I �I awti�J I u+ r+ r+ r+ O O O 0 r M \ gI 1 A , 7' IT I II 'N K --- — 411- — .r+ r+ +I "If— WWI M 0 0 0 0 i . [a s®m e Q p g fill pill ilia# a eeR e=i1Bi�l 1 ii s< E�k E� �- R �� � ! f sir _sa � F� � �i �i�1•�@ '6 c -$ -�� a�`�� � Li aa;� �iip_`=l�:1 ��� _�E, Ori+e��pt i � � � — •� fit IF { V►DYD r NOT rOR � s - fY CONSTRUCTION ( on � H� �{ RECORDING ; P p `•^' In X. (NEW FILE# on 2013-0DS83 ) "s I [ et slei a RM���i ��• r�t44s t I � ..r I/ •®A47®AAA A `.. . - F � I I � � 1 � IIM1 � Ii � E � All 11 in 3 II 1 I I f I [ Itft11E �` '� •� I t I i A i Kill ,111 r�=l�i`;: -I NUT FOR I i PPYlP =(C �j u •� i ; *^ d + P S+ ��r f • i j• a CONSMCTIDN y � � �+ •.c OR t[ r� nnSi RECORDINGIE (NEW FILE 0 oRc 2013-00583 F I i I n � I � Z.Y— 'M Ma : o ' #47— IL .. oA 13 - CD o 0 .-r t • I 1 1 ri rr +r r O Q O O j •i i aH 8EIBC[[] If A dt�e[all 114jile rgill ' Rpi�! f��� i .i.�.. •rii■ i[q it :A. ar :a 6 Aj A 01 [ •: i � � �� ��� '� �i� a � 1�� ;��A� �a�•��E;;a i `� il,r 1F '1� Ix.x E�� !� i.' s[a e i s t + llwJ: �i i� �1� 1! i,e£ i, �1 Ems! t -1 Y" 1, R yelp! .. i•}�••j i['r��. r8r�i. e:! r� ! ; [ e �� �1��� �.�� ilk;�! aBp• +��� �;• , � � p� a : i1bGi1► Q FOR NOT P milli,1' r = •`a CON6[BUCTIDN v i fill E '' XECARAfNC {�i E "' ~ (NEW FILE A DRC 2013-Da5$$ F • '""- • r+ � r r. 10 { L aN _ { n ca v C� 1 4ti 00 f I i w� o 0 0 ��jj ri rf r� •* �o f �. r! 1 1 4 fC. zf - I N N rr r-Y N rr r-r 1 1�1]p) TtyF e�aj■g _t lBe I .OR ! l F t� ele ! i��f�.���■if1 t t F s F q�R ! Et�w�•"�Y �U �4tt_ • F4 AYa�� �� } •�� iM (Lj � . I I l .ii95 }•: t'$c ISH ;E: I�r �$: 'Irk _ I t:K CIS .c �; Its; 5 ;.V; t� i • — 21. g � C 4 .` E x It IN r � P act r £ r - n V p E• Sia' I aNOT FOR { i �•I1 � e M w �' °t y m' i r• CANSTRRuCTtOH m E ii O c wt(E�E�■C�! V • AECORGING � i T!A v NEW FILE p oac 2013-00583) P 9 �yt try► e.. C D/A 1 1 Y �'J CIIeATIVK oestep ASSOCIATES Y• �,r�� R +F SIN I + n i- - � 4.wq.PrY mounfam wow r+.w.aew.r..-... [.•1. �' I.rIw..I.. EAR 46HT El"A"ON SPAAYSIlS RfF ! FRON/BFVATION 1Ty1p .o..... rI. f, to �rT r vti frr pz n T ♦ x. aE x �� cc -I Y •r 0.' .4�4 � i � r ► r:�.r�r y • I II+l I.� r __ 1 Y 1 - __ __ El�+atlltlla Irrw . L6FFELEYATO]H SPAAYSIf ElEIrATAIAI W OS I MA MOM L L.EGeNo 0[SOIIr�CI YAtIW14 IffJ rRmci Fu" Ks reu[ WIE" 0[SOPtpI LiwG1l YM .@ �� [rwarlls r,ws—irrr _ YIRJ fROCUC!/IH91 ■^.Ir r'F Irr.I[rM■[rrswy la�rrr�w Q wrlwr lV w rr[Ir—�iw.r ar�r�ar rr-ram ia�r_rr� Iwrr[r M■[r�fary rr ��.ww�� oi�t.q � r�rr�ir� .'—••�•• _ r^y1lY wwra^i rr trill^ �rw� 11[w-r 'Luc—.= rr/rw R.r ar �r■r■ � Ili-ww �[ a�® w ■w r�ra[ �lr�.. �A.r�1 �v/rr MIS � Yr rtltlrl r■rrT ww rI�.MM e�w ■[ >y r LM�■.■r.■■.a A �rRr � -Y�1 ■r-[�[!M /�li� �.ww w wl/��r � rwuw■rl�r �,♦�s�.+wiw'�ln ® � wr/.r y�,r—rwr �rl« !r-wr rr— .rw■wra r i■r.w�o��r 8 �ww �wu re�.wa�.r� rnlya Ir -_ ® srrwrin >Ar rr�rr[♦lat. �r �rtwW _ srr ri r.w � �w rls4u av�_ .wr-rr rwrw r ww rr-r■�r. @ ewa p Y �11.F1t - �1 ® �Ir�V wlr�r■I�rwR ■��r rrl r 1� �-Vlw�r lr[ rr 1Pw{f rr v p/r OWI �rrrl■y■r �„R �lr �r A — �� P[F.r1Y■br_ ��_ Y �rlF w■�lo wrr•^a rr�■`Wr.[III r Yi-l.Iirlw YIw�� M9. �[M W/ll Wri Os.�r�l r. r� lsrr r I[{r-ilr. ■w.rs.- A-2ai.sr r 4 ' O 4 � Olt � I i .a .a Z � ' J � •x i i Va •a RI Ia l Ra yI .x f 1h1(�LH I O b ra ra y 3 � { 1 I Z I 4 I 1 I I VIP 4 .a It •+ rr rs ra a O � jq pill! = t 'v�olo oil gggg� � I` k i ` 1 �� � w � � � lPPe. il.�ai;z�j tell �I� _l_ � K W. 1 ' ! Ike�• 1 1 �� rE � '•� 11 i�lil !�•1 i i a#rts! ill} . R JT � �� � 1 �;aE� �� �■ �:� s��� i� � 11 1 f�� � i�i t If "e � KF�{o 6{• j t # , .s 1 ■ : A *f sNJ 1 AI�;dE f • � _ { li. 1 ! y , ; �II'�� R 1 �•, OT FOR CONNMUCnOH f s , OR �,• �''''� 1 RECORDWO (NEW FILE N DRc ZOi 3-QO583) Y z� i - — I ---- i. a I ; 4 °° u a,d I � H I --a— w-- —J-a-- --�� s afa' �rx x 0 0 0 0 r-t ry, rr rx r-r r-r 'r r ,. q ai { N� I a VV ; - ir.r r rr �x n.r r•r r I �' '�� wa F G��� �$ = a _ � .� a - �� �$ �a x�a r;���R sex >• pis I®o I I qq # iIfr8.! 198'�i:4pt o ��:€� 6f =a �� q -FRS$. 1 EB �e 6 a C i s�t• s .*� i� �� l ^611IJA Iris" �F 5�t:C =`� Ilia �jH tea ! EE ��@ St i` 4 j'$ � F 's +�� �j i,; ii* ��`R,� � R�(j��i ■��f �� l�i'lit �i6=�s PPI'11 lit CONS�TR[FILO'iR10N � p,r- pe �9 � >� OR m � � � RECORINNO � � �w `�� {NEW FILE 4 DRC 2013-00583 ) P �• ;": 4® ® O O i � " � I - I i ' I' IsHI■Rip; co ; • I I ♦A A AA 1l oilI r � � ! � � I � I I I I — J�{• I k I I I I f I aIII f �1'It IE, ■i fill II I I III ' i, I 1 I 1 I ? r r �.r i�.♦ I I I I isssas 1pt■ Lp a "i CONNOT rOR STRuenoNon CRECDOM t 3 I p`l•-�e I\1 *�� � (NEW RLH0.ORC 2013-00583 ) P ► + �"n `� E8�00'ELOZ aaa 03114r3H f ONlOgo 34 ' V NCILmwswo am lam OUR Q 33winee : ei pp� 6 r1i '1d� i �¢d�]Sq s1� =Ar i16 .1 � f ��:€�1r1"��� �1=s �,r'�`�� ;�r��� � �s 3 i�'�� n s r `' 11 1 �Y �9 �1111all fill j i H=Pi�j'i���r j�; '����� �r'1! �_ Im; I.N.J.11 1�13 i1 :3�. _ a:t��. .1 ■ :E.1r�Id�lsll�.11i: �.�r r$s! � His jig 0 0 0 0 xs y� tr n I ei ! II rl — � � I � � I - � fl 5 G El ri xa fn �f yr yr y rr n xr r. y rR 7 � � z D DD N N 1 N Do c i - ate - - o cz e DO pD DD ° { Nb a `r • V O OO rill 3t #_ R j ■fig, ���x ■��,� �� x�R� �$�I��� f 11l >i i Rlg� pll,t�[ � �■� �xt �p �F�� � � �� 5 � ►►6P•p ��= i � r n w � }} 'n ii HOT MR i 1Y�+ CONSTRUCTIONOR . CEa '� a< RECORDING ; 'Hi p's n (NEW A bRG ZO'�3-QQSS$ � r 1 !" (NEW FILE O a i Ac � � ! � � •t�Etpl��� � � I I I I I I 4 I ! 1 � r Yr I irr I Yid I c I 1 illl Rllrll j1�C i I i +xa r I _ ''44 ilia I I [s 99' e 1 � 1�, , I I • r I MW a 11 + 17 , I t g fj = iM Y_ J UI r � 6 '� r �• � �1 r f 11 T � ill i s r{R GQNut ran CT RfN � 1 [ 1.1 } M K A J b ; NS OR t �'� RECORCIN6 MINN (NEW MEN QRC ZO�I 3-005583 ) Y��+ f 1[[ r " M F - . THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA C�oNM JUNE 312014 - 7:00 P.M. Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Rains Room 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California L CALL TO ORDER ACT Roll Call 7.•p0 PM Regular Members: Richard Fletcher Francisco Oaxaca X Candyce Burnett_ Donald Granger X Alternates: Ray Wimberly— Frances Howdyshell Lou Munoz II. PROJECT.REVIEW ITEMS The following items will be presented by the applicant and/or their representatives. Each presentation and resulting period of Committee. comment is limited to 20 minutes. Following each presentation,the Committee will address major issues and make recommendations with respect to the project proposal The Design Review Committee acts as an advisory Committee to the Planning Commission. Their recommendations will be forwarded to the Planning Commission as applicable. The following items do not legally require any public testimony,although the Committee may open the meeting for public input. A. DESIGN REVIEW DRC2013-00583 - Creative Design Associates - Site A. Approved as plan and architectural review of a 13-unit detached condominium project presented. on 2.17 acres within the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for a site located on the west side of Archibald Avenue and 150 feet north of Monte Vista Street - APN: 0202-131-27,61 and 62. Related files: Tentative Tract Map 17444, Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00942,Minor Exception DRC2013-00941, Minor Exception DRC2014.00358,and Development District Amendment DRC2005-00523. On October 10,2007,a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts was adopted by the Planning Commission for EXHIBIT B 1 of DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA JUNE 3, 2014 HO �aoxw Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444. The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects or minor revisions to projects within the scope of the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. B. SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00305-BRAD BULLER FOR S. Continued to the TERRA VISTA TOWN CENTER-A review of a proposed change to the DRC meeting of June color scheme/theme of an existing commercial complex of about 17, 2014 at the 69.9 acres within the Community Commercial (CC) District, Terra Vista request of the Community Plan, located at the north side of Foothill Boulevard between applicant Havers Avenue and Spruce Avenue-APNs: 1077-422-10,-11,-17,-60,- 62, -66 through -69, and-79 through -92. C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP C. The project was SUBTT18912 - MANNING HOMES - A review of a proposed 46-lot recommended for subdivision of a vacant parcel of about 7.16 acres within the Medium (M) approval with noted and Low Medium (LM) Residential Districts located between Archibald changes. Avenue and Ramona Avenue at the north side of the Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail-APN: 1076-181-01. Related files: Pre-Application Review DRC2013-00545,Zoning Map Amendment DRC2013-00887,Development Review DRC2013-01083, Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00889, Minor Exception DRC2014-00161. D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW D. The project was DRC2013-01083 - MANNING HOMES - A review of a proposal for recommended for 46 single-family residences in conjunction with a 46-lot subdivision of approval with noted about 7.16 acres within the Medium(M)and Low Medium(LM)Residential changes. Districts located between Archibald Avenue and Ramona Avenue at the north side of the Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail-APN: 1076-181-01. Related tiles: Pre-Application Review DRC2013-00545, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2013-00887, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18912, Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00889,and Minor Exception DRC2014-00161. 2of3 DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA JUNE 3, 2014 uca�soxo� III. PUBLIC COMMENTS 71 None. This is the time and place for the general public to address the Committee. State law Prohibits the Committee from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Committee may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are limited to five minutes per individual. dual. ADJOURNMENT 8:02 p.m. The Design Review Committee has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11:00 P.M.adjournment time. If items go beyond that time,they shall be heard only with the consent of the Committee. 3of3 City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: DRC2005-00523, SUBTT17444, DRC2005-00250, AND DRC2005-00522 This Mitigation Monitoring Program(MMP)has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the (Mitigated Negative Declaration/Environmental Impact Report) for the above-listed project. This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components - This MMP contains the following elements: 1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance.The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project. 2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management-The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The project planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants'fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. 2. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto. This procedure designates who will take action,what action will be taken and when,and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority for processing the Project. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address: City of Rancho Cucamonga - Lead Agency Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 EXHIBIT C Mitigation Monitoring Program ORC2005-00523, SUBTTt 7444, DRC2005-00250, AND DRC2005-00522 Page 2 3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staffs is needed,as determined by the project planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner. 4. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development. 5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. 6. Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures.The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel. 7. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after written notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. S. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division. The Division shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time. 9. In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the monitoring results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City`s MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: SUBTT17444 and DRC2005-00250 Applicant: Eria Chen Creative Design Assoc. Initial Study Prepared by: Tabe van der Zwaaa Date: October 10,2007 Mitigation P-Jezisures No. i • ActionImplementing .. . • r iinitials Sanctions for Air Quality � � � _ Non-Compliance All construction equipmentshall be maintained in good PD C Review of plans A/C 214 operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. Contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment Is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers'specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. Prior to the issuance of any Grading Permits, the PD/BO C Review of plans C 2 developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that law-emission mobile construction equipment will be ut#iized, or that their use was Investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District(SCAQMD)as well as City Planning Staff. All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed PD C Review of plans ACC 2/4 performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Points and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume,low-pressure spray. i All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards BO B Review of plans A/C noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 2 All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD BO C Review of plans AIC 214 Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: ■ Reestablish ground cover on the construction site BD C Review of plans A/C through seeding and watering. 2/4 9 of 8 ■ Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. BO C Review of plans AIC 2I4 ■ Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule*activities to minimize the amounts of BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accoronce BO C Review of plans A 4 with local ordinances and use sound engineiering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule establ(shed BO C During A 4 by the City if slit is carried over to adjacent public construction thoroughfares or occurs as a result of haµling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of Year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high windl(i.s., BO C During A 4 wind speeds exceeding 25 mph)in accordancp with construction SCAQMD Rule 403.requirements. • Maintain a minimum 2"ch freeboard ratio oq soils BO C During A 4 haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other Construction suitable means. The site shall be treated with water or othe( soil- BO C During A 4 stabilizing agent(approved by SCAQMD and Regional construction Water Quality Control Board(RWQCBD daily to reduce PM,o emissions,in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. v Chemical soU-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMQ and BO C During. A 4 RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to(educe PM,o emissions. The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean BO C Review of plans A/C 4 alternative fuel powered equipmentwhere feasible. _ The construction contractor shall ensure that 50 C Review of plans A/C 2I4 construction-grading plans include a statementthptwork crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 2of8 Mitigation - • • Mcintwu • Verified Sanctions for jLMa a • • ■ • All residential and commercial structures shall be 8O CID Review of plans C 214 required to Incorporate high efficiencyllow polluting heating,air conditioning,appliances,and water heaters. All residential and commercial structures shall be 80 CID Review of plans C 2/4 required to Incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. Biological Resources Preserve or relocate the following trees: pD B Review of Plans C • Three Jeffrey Pine Trees identified as trees 16, 17,and 18 in report • One Canary island Date Palm identified as tree 31 In report. • One Eucalyptus Lemon Scented Gum Identified as tree 32 in report. • One Coast lave Oak identified as tree 33 in report One hundred percent of the trees to be planted to most PD i Review of Plans C 2 the City's 40 trees per acre requirement shall be minimum 24-inch box size trees. Cultural Resources If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading,the developerwill retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist,the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enactinterim measures to protect undesignated sites PDI80 C Review of report AID 314 from demolition orsignificant modification withoutan opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. 3of8 f Verified Sanctions for . • .. . • Consider establishing provisions to require PDIBO C Review of report AD 3!4 incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities ps a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the P©1BO C Review of report AID 314 archaeological heritage of the area. ■ Propose mitigation measures and recommend PDIBO C Review of report ArD 314 conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines. Prepare a technical resources management report, PC C Review of report All] 314 documenting the Inventory,evaluation,and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report, with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permpnent archiving. report A!0 4 If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or an PC B Review of fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer Will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for Itudy. The paleontologist shall submit a report of fir%dings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring)that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriat9, the program must include, but not be limited tp, the following measures: Review of report AID 4 13 • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and PC p equipped to allow the rapid removal of fosr4s with minimal construction delay,to the ske full-timq during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. 4of8 Implementing Actiorl Responsible Monitoi in U Timing of Nlethod of Verified Sanctions for rNon-Ccuiphzince ■ Should fossils be found with an area being cleared � B/C Review of report 4 or graded,divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. ■ Prepare,Identify,and curate all recovered fossils for PD D Review of report D 3 documentation In the summary report and transferto an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). ■ Submit summary report to City of Rancho PD D Review of report D 3 Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy to the report to San Bernardino County Museum. Geology and Soils The site shall be treated with water or other BO C During A 4 soli-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and construction RWQCB)daily to reduce PM»emissions,in accordance ' with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a BO C During A 4 schedule established by the City to reduce PMjo construction emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off`site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of Year of construction. Grading operations shall be suspended when wind BO C During A 4 speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PMto emissions from construction the site during such episodes. Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and SO C During A 4 RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PMto emissions. 5of8 Hydrology and Water Quality Prior to issuance of Grading Permits,the permit applicant BO BICID Review of plans A/C 214 shall submit to Building Official for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices(BMPs)thatshall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared,Included in BO BICID Review of plans A/C 2/4 grading plan,and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time of ground distyrbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the follpwing measures at a minimum: a)Specify the timing of gra ding and construction to minimize soft exposure to I rainy periods experienced in southern California, and p) An inspection and maintenance program shall be Included to ensure that any erosion which does occur elhpr on- sits or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediatlon or restoration program witirin a specified time frame. During construction,temporary berms such as sandbags BO BICID Review of plans A/C 2/4 or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. During construction,to remove pollutants,streetclpaning BO BICID Review of plans A/C 214 will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. The developer shall implement the BMPs identified In CE BICID Review of plans A/C 2/4 the Water Quality Management Plan prepared byW&W Technologies on April 27, 2005, to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain systerrl to the maximum extent practical. 6of8 Landscaping plans shall include provisions forconl5rolling 8O B/CJD Review of plans A/C and minimizing the use of ferlilizerstpesgcideslherbicides. 2/4 Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two yearq,shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to Fdescripfion ance of Grading Permits. issuance of Building Permits,the applicagt shall CE to the CityEn 81C/D Review of plans AIC �4 Engineer for approval of a Water Management Plan(WQMP),including a project tion and identifying Best Management Prgctices that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into rm drain system to the mabmum extent ble. The WQMP shalt identify the structural and ctural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga In June 2004. Prior to issuance of Grading or Paving Permits,applicant BO BICID Review of plans A/C shall obtain a Notice of intent (NOI) to comply with 214 obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Gpneral ' Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been ' obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to thp City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES Genera) Construction Permit. Noise Construction or grading shall not take place between the BO C hours of a:00 p.m.and 6:30 a.m.on weekdays,including Ding A 4 Saturday,or at anytime on Sunday or a national hpliday. construction ---------------------- 7of8 Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the BO C During A 4 standards specified in Development Code Section construction 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified In Development Geode Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall Immediately potify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards,then construction activities shall be reduced in Intensity to a level of compliance with above poise standards or halted. The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as e9dy as PD C During A A possible In the first phase. construction Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the PO180 C During A 417 hours of 8:00 p.m.and 6:30 a.m.on weekdays,bc4uding construction Saturday,or at anytime on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling Would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and !ropy the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction trade haul routes. To the extent feasible,the plan shall genote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. Construct a continuous 7-foot high solid wall with no PD C During Plan A 4 openings or gaps along the entire Archbald Apenue Check frontage at the 45-foot setback from the curb-fade and wrapping around at the north and south end§ to a distance to be determined by final acoustical repgrt. Key to Checklist Abbreviations tions Responsible Person Monhorina Frequer" Metttod of Verifloetlon I-Withhold COO-CeromunMy Development Dkeclor or designee A-W tlh Each Now Development A-On-idle IRSPKt on 1-WilhhWd Recordegon of FMW Map PO-Planning Domeier or designee a-Prior To Construction B-Other Agency Pwmlt 1 Approval 2-W ithhoki Grading or Suluft Pemtd CE-City Engaheer or dosionee C-Thnwghaut Conku"tion C-Plan Check 3-Wkhhdd CertMlcale of occupancy BO-Building Official or daslpnee D-On CompMm D-Sepaate Submittal(Rep22ndled Plsnt) 4-Stop Work Order PD-Paliee Captain or designee E-Opewdng 3•Ratahn Dapoeli or Bonds 6-Rewke CUP FC-Fha Chief or designee I:VlannNYInal%chaoW=hldsl-fev12-4 6fmal.doc ' 8of8 RESOLUTION NO. 15-14 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW DRC2013-00583, SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW OF A 13 UNIT DETACHED CONDOMINIUM PROJECT ON 2.17 ACRES OF LAND IN THE LOW MEDIUM (LM) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR A SITE LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND 150 FEET NORTH OF MONTE VISTA STREET;AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF—APN: 202- 131-27, 61 AND 62 A. Recitals. 1. Creative Design Associates filed an application for the approval of Design Review DRC2013-00583 as described irr the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Design Review request is referred to as"the application." 2. On the 11th day of February 2015 the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred, B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on February 11, 2015, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a property located on the west side of Archibald Avenue and 150 feet north of Monte Vista Street in the Low Medium (LM) Development District; and b. The 2.17-acre site slopes gently to the southeast and contains 45 trees of various species and the remnants of a stone-lined drainage channel; and C. A Phase II Cultural Resource Significance Assessment (Michael Brandman Associates, October 31,2006)submitted for the original project concluded that the project site is not considered eligible for listing as an historic resource or landmark status at either the local or State level; and d. The adjacent mobile home park has an open storm drain which currently surface drains across the site and enters the public storm drain system at the southern boundary of the site, which will be undergrounded as part of the project; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-14 DRC2013-00583-CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES February 11, 2015 Page 2 e. To the north and west is a mobile home park within the Low Medium (LM) Development District.To the south are single-family residences within the Medium(M)Development District: and, to the east, across Archibald Avenue, is a multi-family project within the Medium (M) Development District; and f. The project was designed to conform to the development standards outlined in the Optional Development Standards of the Development Code for the Low-Medium Development District. The units have a minimum 15-foot side-to-side setback and exceed the required 30-foot front-to-front setback.The project provides 46 percent of private and common open space area, in excess of the minimum 45 percent open space requirement; and g. The project will be gated and includes sidewalks that provide connections to the common open space areas and to the front entrance and public sidewalk along Archibald Avenue. The project also includes a secondary emergency vehicle access along Archibald Avenue with a manual sliding gate; and h. The common open space amenities include two covered picnic tables with BBQ units, a tot lot and two open play areas. An attached two-car garage is provided with each unit in addition to 11 guest parking spaces, 6 parking spaces over the minimum requirement; and L The project includes 3 plans—2, two-story models and 1, one-story model. The two-story models will each have two elevation types(Spanish and cottage) and range in size from 1,697 to 2,145 square feet. The single-story model will have one elevation type (Spanish) and is 1,792 square feet; and j. The basic layout and building footprints of the proposed project are similar to the originally approved project.The applicant has reversed the floor plans on a number of units,the pad elevations have been slightly adjusted to comply with current Building Code and WQMP requirements, and the elevations have been updated to reflect current design criteria.The project is compliant with all of the conditions of approval outlined for the related Tentative Tract Map (SUBTT17444). 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan in that the project site is residentially zoned and is being subdivided for residential purposes. The project site is being developed with 13 detached condominiums with a project density of 6 dwelling units per acre, within the permitted density range of 4 to 8 units per acre for the Low Medium (LM) zoning designation. b. That the proposed design is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located in that the proposed residential development is a permitted use within the Low Medium (LM) Residential District and is being developed at the midpoint of the permitted density range. C. That the proposed design is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code including project density, setbacks, parking, private and common open space areas and recreation facilities. The project, though, requires the approval of two separate Minor Exceptions for wall height.One Minor Exception is necessary to attenuate vehicle noise from PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-14 DRC2013-00583 -CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES February 11, 2015 Page 3 Archibald Avenue(DRC2013-00941),and a second Minor Exception is necessary because of grade differences between the private yard areas on the project site and a grade difference between the project site and the adjacent mobile home park; d. That the proposed design,together with the conditions applicable thereto,will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity in that the lots will be used for residential development in accord with the Low Medium(LM)Residential District and will provide adequate on-site parking and recreational amenities. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the application, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application,the Planning Commission finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in connection with the review and approval of this application based upon the following findings and determinations: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act("CEQA")and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration on October 10, 2007 in connection with the City's approval of SUBTT17444. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project unless: (i) substantial changes are proposed to the project that indicate new or more severe impacts on the environment;(ii)substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the project was previously reviewed that indicates new or more severe environmental Impacts; or(III) new important information shows the project will have new or more severe impacts than previously considered;or(iv)additional mitigation measures are now feasible to reduce impacts or different mitigation measures can be imposed to substantially reduce impacts. b. The Planning Commission finds, in connection with the Design Review DRC2013- 00583,that substantial changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project have not occurred which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. The general layout and number of units have not changed from the original environmental determination. Staff further fords that the project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration, not have more severe effects than previously analyzed,and that additional or different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less than significant, as the project layout and design have not changed since the original environmental determination. All applicable mitigation measures in the adopted MND will apply to this project. C. Based on these findings and all evidence in the record,the Planning Commission concurs with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is required pursuant to CEQA in connection with the City's consideration of the current application. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached standard conditions incorporated herein by this reference. Plannino Department 1) Approval is for the site plan and architectural review of a 13-unit detached condominium development located an the west side of PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-14 DRC2013-00583-CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES February 11, 2015 Page 4 Archibald Avenue and 150 feet north of Monte Vista Street - APN: 202-131-27, 61, and 62. 2) All Conditions of Approval and Mitigation Measures in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444 shall apply to this approval. 3) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, State Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniform Building Code, or any other City Ordinances. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2015. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Ravenel Wimberly, Chairman ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Secretary 1, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced,passed,and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of February 2015, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Conditions of Approval C�HO ONG+ Community Development Department Project#: DRC2013-00583 DRC2013-00941, DRC2013-00942, DRC2014-00358 Project Name: Creative Design Associates Location: 6910 ARCHIBALD AVE-020213161-0000 Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: A. Planning Department 1. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 2. Construct block walls between homes (i.e., along interior side and rear property lines), rather than wood fencing for permanence, durability, and design consistency. 3. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified In a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination and in conformance with Building and Safety Services Department standards, the Municipal Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department(RCFD)Standards. 4. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CCr~iRs) and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners` Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Services Department and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer. The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning Department a list of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes. 5. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all lots for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department approval; including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing. S. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, the Development Code regulations, the Specific Plan, Master Plan and the Community Plan 7. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanenily maintained b e property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 8. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director and Police Department (909-477-2800) prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. Printed:112112015 WW W.C1ty0fRC.us Project#: DRC2013-00563 DRC2013-00941, DRC2013-00942, DRC2014-00358 Project Name: Creative Design Associates Location: 8910 ARCH IBALD AVE-020213161-0000 Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Minor Exception,Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.- A. Planning Department 9. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double wall condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owners at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/fences along the project perimeter. 10. For residential development, return walls and comer side walls shall be decorative masonry. 11. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Services Department. 12. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of water efficient landscaping per Development Code Chapter 17.82. 13. For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way. All landscaped areas shall be .kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage. 14. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits for the development or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. For development occurring in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, the landscape plans will also be reviewed by Fire Construction Services. 15. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 16. A minimum of trees per gross acre, comprised of the following sizes, shall be provided within the project: percent - 48-inch box or larger percent - 36-inch box or larger, percent-24-inch box or larger, percent-15-gallon, and percent-5 gallon. 17. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking stalls. 18. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included In the required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Services Department www.CltyafRC us Printed.,112il2015 page 2 of 9 Project#: DRC2013-00583 DRC2013-00941, DRC2013-00942, DRC2014-00358 Project Name: Creative Design Associates Location: 6910 ARCHIBALD AVE-020213161-0000 Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. A. Pfannina Department 19. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorneys fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 20. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. or Approval Letter, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealedlstamped by a licensed EngineedArchitect. 21. Crime Free Multi-Family Housing Program - The owner shall cause the manager and any resident manager to complete the training for and enroll the project in the San Bernardino County Crime Free Multi-Family Housing Program. 22. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption and Mitigated Negative Declaration fee in the amount of $2,260.00. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing. 23. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 24. All units shall be provided with garage door openers if driveways are less than 18 feet in depth from back of sidewalk. 25. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 17 feet long with a required 1-foot overhang (e.g., over a curb stop). 26. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. 27. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellingslunitslbuildings with open spaces/plazas/ recreational uses. 28. The applicant shall submit certification from an acoustical` engineer that all recommendations of the acoustical report were implemented in construction, including measurements of interior and exterior noise levels to document compliance with City standards. Certification shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department and the Planning Department prior to final occupancy release of the affected homes. PdMod.1/21/2015 www.C4ofRC.us Page 3 of 9 Project#: DRC2013-00583 DRC2013-00941, DRC2013-00942, DRC2014-00358 Project Name: Creative Design Associates Location: 6910 ARCHIBALD AVE-020213161-0000 Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. A. Planning Department 29. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the Issuance of Building Permits. The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and construction techniques provided, and if appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures. The building plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained In the final report. 30. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of Implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Planning Director in the amount of $729 prior to the issuance of Building Permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit. 31. In those instances requiring long term monitoring (i.e. beyond final certificate of occupancy), the applicant shall provide a written monitoring and reporting program to the Planning Director prior to issuance of Building Permits. Said program shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. B. Enaineerina Services DepartMent 1. Install traffic signal at Intersection of Archibald Avenue and Victoria Street/project entry. a. Provide easements as needed for traffic signal equipment and maintenance on private drive aisle. b. Upon completion of the joint use driveway and the traffic signal Installation, the existing driveway to the mobile home park shall be closed and reconstructed with curb, gutter, sidewalk and street trees to the satisfaction of the mobile home park and the City Engineer. c. The developer shall receive credit against and reimbursement of costs in excess of the Transportation Development Fee in conformance with City Policy. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within 6 months of the public Improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. 2. Provide two(2)9500 Lumens LED street lights. 3. Verify existing access ramps on Archibald Avenue and Monte Vista for conformance to ADA requirements and to City Std. 102. Otherwise reconstruct access ramps to current City Std. 100-B and 102 and have a surface applied truncated dome detectable warning surface as supplied by ADA Solutions, Inc. or approved equal. Printed:112112015 WWW.C1ty0fRC.u3 Pape 4 0!9 Project : DRC2013-00583 DRC2013-00941, DRC2013-00942, DRC2014-00358 Project Name: Creative Design Associates Location: 6910 ARCHIBALD AVE-020213161-0000 Project Type- Design Review Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. B. En-ainegring Servlcgs Dep rtmenj 4. Provide a final drainage report to determine: a. Storm water flows for the fully developed tributary area north of the Archibald/Monte Vista Intersection, for both the 25-year and 100-year storm events, with nodes at the proposed inlet facility and all catch basins. b, Include a preliminary water surface profile gradient analysis of the proposed pipe to determine If the drop in the existing pipe under Monte Vista Avenue has a negative impact an the hydraulic grade line of the proposed storm drain pipe. c. Determine the extent of ponding as a result of relocating the pipe inlet headwa nd alternatives to direct overflows to Archibald Avenue without Impacting adjacent properties.ll a propose d. Confirm that 0100 will remain within the street on Archibald(top of curb). 5. Provide confirmation from Cucamonga Valley Water District that a 1-foot separation between the bottom of a sewer line and the top of a storm drain is acceptable, 8. The following impact fees shall be paid upon issuance of buildin annually with a scheduled Increase May 1, 2016): g permit (fees subject to change a. Transportation Fee $ 9,002.00 b. General Drainage Fee $ 19,382.001 per net acre c. Beautification Fee $ 0.20/SF d. Park Fees $4,396.00 e. Library Impact Fee $ 576.98 f. Animal Center Impact Fee $ 124.29 g. Police Impact Fee $ 172.00 7. Gated entrance shall be in accordance with the City's "Residential Project Gated Entrance Design Guide" standard. 8. Private storm drains connecting to the public storm drain will need to be shown on the public improvement plans, but they shall be labeled "prlva#e" and their sizing will be reviewed by the Building and Safety Division in plan check. 9. All pertinent conditions of approval of Planning Commission Resolution No. 07-59 approving Tentative Tract Map 17444 shall apply. 10. Structures within the vicinity of the City's storm drain shall provide deepened footings so as to avoid a surcharge on the storm drain. E. Grading Section Printed:1121/2015 WWw,CJtyomRC,us Pape 5 of 9 Project* DRC2013-00583 DRC2013-00941, DRC2013-00942, DRC2014-00358 Project Name: Creative Design Associates Location: 6910 ARCHIBALD AVE-020213161-0000 Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Minor Exception,Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT., E. Gradina Section 1. The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the structural storm water treatment devices (including but not limited to the infiltration trenches) to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project All costs associated with the structural storm water treatment devices are the responsibility of the land owner. 2. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, on the permitted set of grading and drainage plans the engineer of record small provide a definition (including an Inset exhibit if necessary) defining the term "Distributed Area". 3. Prior to issuance of a grading permit should a conflict occur between the Final Project-Specific Water Quality Management Plan Site and Drainage Plan and the final Project Landscaping Plans, the project Improvements shown on the Final Project-Specific Water Quality Management Plan Site and Drainage Plan shall govern. 4. Prior to issuance of a grading permit a copy of the final project landscaping plan(s) shall be submitted as a reference set of plans with the permitted set of precise grading plans for review and shall be Included in the final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan. 5. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted Califomia Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shaft be In substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 6. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of Califomia to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 7. A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 8. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the Issuance of building permits. 9. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a Cafifomia licensed Civil Engineer. 10. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit 11. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, that plan shall be a separate plan/permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. Mv.OYO RC.us Printed:1121/2615 Page 8 of 9 Project#: DRC2013-00583 DRC2013-00941, DRC2013-00942, DRC2014-00358 Project Name: Creative Design Associates Location: 6910 ARCHIBALD AVE-020213181-0000 Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOKING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: E. Gradil Section on A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on-site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed b the Engineer of Record. y 13. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage easements prior to the Issuance of a grading permit. 14. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to obtain written permission from the adjacent Property owners) to construct wall on property line or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. 15. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall Implement City Standards for on-site construction where Possible, and provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 18. All slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public property. right of way or adjacent private 17. Private sewer, water, and storm drain Improvements will be designed per the, latest adapted California Plumbing Code. 18. Private streets for multifamily developments will include street plans as part of the Grading and Drainage Plan seL Plan view to show typical street sections. Profile view to show centerline and top of curb profiles. 19. The maximum parking stall gradient Is 5 percent. Accessibility constructed per the, current adopted California Building Code. parking stall grades shall be 20. Roof storm water is not permitted to flow over the public parkway and shall be directed to an under parkway culvert per City of Rancho Cucamonga requirements prior to issuance of a grading permit 21. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond project boundary, 22. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond far all cut and fi11 combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to Issuance of a grading permit The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official. 23. This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted Califomla Building Code. 24. The precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout"Information for Grading Plans and permit". PrlMed•1/21/2015 WWW.C40mc us Page 7 of 9 Project* DRC2013-00583 DRC2013-00941, DRC2013-00942, DRC2014.00358 Project Name; Creative Design Associates Location. - 6910 ARCHIBALD AVE-020213161-0000 Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.- E. Qrading Section 25. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over-excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; ill) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or Owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record: iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 28. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Oocupancy the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) best management practices (BMP) devices. 27. The Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 2S. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment best management practices (BMP) devices as provided for In the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan shall be provided for by CC&R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit Said CCSR's and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. 29. Prior to issuance of a grading permit on the final grading and drainage plan the applicant shall clearly show an emergency overflow drainage path should the proposed storm drain pipe become clogged/plugged with debris. The emergency overflow path shall not flood any residential structures. 30. The Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) has been deemed "Acceptable". Prior to the issuance of a grading permit a final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official. 31. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Stoma Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 32. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number(WDID). 33. A Grading Bond will be required to be submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department Official for review and approval prior to issuance of a Grading Permit, Printed:1121=15 www.CifycfRC.trs Page B of 9 Project A DRC2013.00583 DRC2013-00941, DRC2013-00942, DRC2014-00358 Project Name: Creative Design Associates Location: 6910 ARCH1BAt_D AVE-020213161-0000 Project Type: pesfgn Review Minor Exception, Minor Exceptlon, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. E. Grading Seaton 34. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment best management practices (BMP joint devices, as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan, shah be provided for by CC&R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the issuance a grading and/or deeds shall be included in the 9 g permit Said CC�R s (WQMP) document prior to approval of the j WQMP document Sand retorm cording of ter i the Me ty moment Plan Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. Memorandum of 35. Prior to issuance of a wall permit, on engineered combination garden property boundary the structural calculations for the wall shall assume a level toe1/heel at lithe long the off-site property(i.e. a manufactured slope is not present). 36. Flow lines steeper than 6 percent could be erosive. The applicant shall provide hard lined gutters and swales where concentrated flows exceed 3fps, and anywhere that flow lines exceed 10 percent 37. Prior to removing fences or walls along common lot lines and prior to constructing walls aloe common lot lines the applicant shall provide a letter from the adjacent pro g work on the adjacent property. party owner(s) allowing 38. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the Erosion Control Plan shall show a City required dust control sign within 50-feet of the project construction entrance and a second dust control sign shall be Placed within 50-feet of the Chapparal Heights Mobile Home Park entrance. 39. All underground vaults within the proposed construction area on the Chapparal Heights Mobil Home Park which are not traffic rated shall be shown on the permitted set of grading and drains e plans to be replaced with traffic rated vaults prior to the issuance of a grading permit g 40. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the engineer of record shall submit with the domestic water and sewer plans, calculations showingthe private Ppounder the proposed storm water quality infiltration renches Twills ine withstand sewerand bluoyance aced aissues created from the proximity to the said infiltration trenches. 41. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Erosion Control Plan shall show the project construction entrance fronting directly on a public street Construction access from the Chapparal Heights Mobile Home Parts shall not be permitted. 42. Prior to the Issuance of a grading permit that applicant shall make a good faith effort in wdUn and show on the permitte grading and drainge plan, work to be completed on the Chapparal Heights Mobile Home Park including, but not limited to, refinishing the drainage inlet on the Chap aral approved conceptual grading and drainage plan dated June 03,2014. Heights Mobile Home Park property along with any other construction requirements as shown on the Printed,112112015 WWW QYWRC.us Page 9 of 9 RESOLUTION NO. 15-15 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA.APPROVING MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2013-00941,A REQUEST TO ALLOW 7-FOOT HIGH WALLS ALONG ARCHIBALD AVENUE FOR NOISE ATTENUATION IN CONNECTION WITH DESIGN REVIEW DRC2013-00583 FOR THE SITE PLAN AND DESIGN REVIEW OF A 13-UNIT DETACHED CONDOMINIUM PROJECT ON 2.17 ACRES WITHIN THE LOW MEDIUM (LM) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT(4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE)FORA SITE LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND 150 FEET NORTH OF MONTE VISTA STREET; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF—APN: 0202-131-27, 61 AND 62 A. Recitals. 1. Creative Design Associates filed an application for the approval of Minor Exception DRC2013-00941 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Minor Exception request Is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 11th day of February 2015 the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Reso�n_. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: I. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on February 11, 2015, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a property located on the west side of Archibald Avenue and 150 feet north of Monte Vista Street In the Low Medium (LM) Residential District; and b. The 2.17-acre site is comprised of three parcels and slopes gently to the southeast. The site contains 45 trees of various species and the remnants of a stone lined drainage channel. The adjacent mobile home park has an open storm drain which currently surface drains across the site and enters the public storm drain system at the southern boundary of the site; and C. To the north and west is a mobile home park within. the Low Medium (LM) Residential District. To the south are single-family residences within the Medium (M) Residential District: and, to the east, across Archibald Avenue, is a multi-family project within the Medium (M) Residential District; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-15 DRC2013-00941 -CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES February 11,2015 Page 2 d. The project complies with all related development criteria of the Low Medium(M) Residential District including project density,building design,setbacks,parking,private and common open space areas, landscape coverage and recreation facilities. The project, though, requires the approval of two separate Minor Exceptions for wall height.This Minor Exception to attenuate vehicle noise from Archibald Avenue; and, a second Minor Exception(DRC2014-00358), for combination walls over the permitted 6-foot height limit. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The Minor Exception is consistent with the General Plan or any applicable specific plan or Development Agreement. The proposed increase in wall height along the eastern project boundary is necessary to comply with the General Plan Goal PS-13 to minimize the impacts of excessive noise levels and General Plan Policy PS-1 3-3 to consider the use of noise barriers or walls to reduce noise levels generated by ground transportation. The increased wall height will reduce the onsite noise levels to be in compliance with City regulations. b. The proposed development is compatible with existing and proposed land uses in the surrounding area. The proposed project is compatible with the surrounding land uses in that the project site is within the Low Medium (LM) Residential District, which permits the development of single and multi-family residences. Additionally, there is a residential development to the north, south and west of the project site and to the east across Archibald Avenue. Noise attenuation walls over the permitted height limit occur throughout the City along major streets. C. The proposed exception to the specific development standard(s) is necessary to allow creative design solutions compatible with the desires of the community and/or to accommodate unique site conditions. The project is located along a major street which Increases the onsite noise levels In excess of City regulations. The increased wall height will permit the project to comply with City noise attenuation requirements and provide a pleasing street scene. The Proposed wall will be constructed of decorative block and the area between the wall and the public right-of-way will be landscaped to soften the appearance of the wall. d. The granting of the Minor Exception will not constitute a grant of special privilege Inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district, and will not be detrimental to public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious properties or improvements in the vicinity. It is common practice to approve Minor Exceptions for wall height in order to mitigate excessive noise levels for projects adjacent to major streets. The increased wall height will not negatively impact properties in the vicinity as the walls will be required to have a decorative finish and landscaping will soften the appearance of the extra wall height. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the application, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application,the Planning Commission finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in connection with the review and approval of this application based upon the following findings and determinations: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act("CEQA")and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration on October 10, y, in connection with the City's approval of SUBTT17444. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required in connection with PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-15 DRC2013-00941 -CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES February 11,2015 Page 3 subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project unless: (1) substantial changes are proposed to the project that indicate new or more severe impacts on the environment; (ii)substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the project was previously reviewed that indicates new or more severe environmental impacts; or(ill) new Important information shows the project will have new or more severe impacts than previously considered;or(iv)additional mitigation measures are now feasible to reduce impacts or different mitigation measures can be imposed to substantially reduce impacts. b. The Planning Commission finds, in connection with the Minor Exception DRC2013-00941, that substantial changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project have not occurred which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. The general layout and number of units have not changed from the original environmental determination. Staff further finds that the project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration, not have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less than significant, as the project layout and design have not changed since the original environmental determination. C. Based on these findings and all evidence in the record,the Planning Commission concurs with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is required pursuant to CEQA in connection with the City's consideration of the current application. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and In the attached standard conditions incorporated herein by this reference. Plannin Department 1) Approval is for a Minor Exception to increase the project perimeterwall height along Archibald Avenue and wrapping around Unit 7 from 6 feet to 7 feet for noise attenuation purposes related to the development of a 13-unit detached condominium project located on the west side of Archibald Avenue and 150 feet north of Monte Vista Street - APN: 202-131-27, 61, and 62. 2) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, State Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniform Building Code, or any other City Ordinances. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2015. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-15 DRC2013-00941 -CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES February 11, 2015 Page 4 BY. Revenel Wimberly, Chairman ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced,passed,and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of February 2015, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Conditions of Approval R1NCHo CUCAMONGA Commnntty Development Department Project A DRC2013-00583 DRC2013-00941, DRC2013-00942, ORC2014-00358 Project Name; Creative Design Associates Location- 6910 ARCHIBALD AVE-020213161-0000 Project Type- Design Review Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: A. Plannina Denartment 1. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 2. Construct block walls between homes (i.e., along interior side and rear property lines), rather than wood fencing for permanence, durability,and design consistency_ 3. All building numbers and Individual units shall be Identified In a clear and concise manner, Including proper illumination and In 'conformance with Building and Safety Services Department standards, the Municipal Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department(RCFD)Standards. 4. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CCBRs) and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Services Department and the.City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer. The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning Department a list of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes. 5. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all lots for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department approval; including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing. 6. The site shall be developed and maintained In accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, the Development Code regulations, the Specific Plan, Master Plan and the Community Plan / 7. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be P 9 permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Prof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 8. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director and Police Department (909-477-2800) prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Such plan shall Indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. PdntW:1121IM15 WWW-CityafRC.us Project#: DRC2013-00583 DRC2013-00941, DRC2013-00942, DRC2014-00358 Project Name: Creative Design Associates Location: 6910 ARCHIBALD AVE-020213161-0000 Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.- A. PlannIng Deveftent 9. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double wall condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owners at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/fences along the project perimeter. 10. For residential development, return walls and comer side walls shall be decorative masonry. 11. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located'in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Services Department. 12. Landscaping and Irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of water efficient landscaping per Development Code Chapter 17.82. 13. For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way. All landscaped areas shall be .kept free from weeds and debris and maintained In healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage. 14. A detailed landscape and Irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits for the development or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. For development occurring In the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, the landscape plans will also be reviewed by Fire Construction Services. 15. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be Installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 16. A minimum of trees per gross acre, comprised of the following sizes, shall be provided within the project: percent - 48-inch box or larger percent - 36-inch box or larger, percent-24-Inch box or larger, percent-15-gallon, and percent-5 gallon. 17. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking stalls. 18. The final design of the perimeter parkways, wails, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Services Department. Printed'112112015 www.Cltyo(RC us Page 2 or 9 Project* DRC2013-00583 DRC2013-00941, DRC2013-00942, DRC2014-00358 Project Name: Creative Design Associates Location: 6910 ARCHIBALD AVE-020213161-0000 Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.- A. Planning Departmen 19. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the Issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorneys fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 20. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. or Approval Letter, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet seated/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 21. Crime Free Multi-Family Housing Program - The owner shall cause the manager and any resident manager to complete the training for and enroll the project in the Sari Bernardino County Crime Free Multi-Famfly Housing Program. 22. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption and Mitigated Negative Declaration fee in the amount of $2,260.00. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing. 23. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 24. All units shall be provided with garage door openers If driveways are less than 18 feet in depth from back of sidewalk. 25. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 17 feet long with a required 1-foot overhang (e.g., over a curb stop). 26. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. 27. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/plazas/ recreational uses. 28. The applicant shall submit certification from an acoustical engineer that all recommendations of the acoustical report were implemented in constructlon, including measurements of interior and exterior noise levels to document compliance with City standards. Certification shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department and the Planning Department prior to final occupancy release of the affected homes. Pdnted:1/211201S vwvw.CftyofRC.us Pape 3 of 9 la....... J- r-/4 Project#. DRC2013-00583 DRC2013-00941, ORC2013-00942, DRC2014-00356 Project Name: Creative Design Associates Location: 6910 ARCHIBALD AVE-020213161-0000 Project Type: Design Revlew Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.- A. Planning DepadMent 29. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and construction techniques provided, and If appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures. The building plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report. 30. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of Implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Planning Director in the amount of $729 prior to the issuance of Building Permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit 31. In those instances requiring long term monitoring (i.e. beyond final certificate of occupancy), the applicant shall provide a written monitortng and reporting program to the Planning Director prior to Issuance of Building Permits. Said program shall Identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been Implemented. B. Enaineering Services Department 1. Install traffic signal at intersection of Archibald Avenue and Victoria Street/project entry. a. Provide easements as needed for traffic signal equipment and maintenance on private drive aisfe. b. Upon completion of the joint use driveway and the traffic signal installation, the existing driveway to the mobile home park shall be closed and reconstructed with curb, gutter, sidewalk and street trees to the satisfaction of the mobile home park and the City Engineer. c. The developer shall receive credit against and reimbursement of costs in excess of the Transportation Development Fee in conformance with City Policy. If the developer falls to submit for said reimbursement agreement within 6 months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. 2. Provide two(2)9500 Lumens LED street lights. 3. Verify existing access ramps on Archibald Avenue and Monte Vista for conformance to ADA requirements and to City Std. 102. Otherwise reconstruct access ramps to current City Std. 100-B and 102 and have a surface applied truncated dome detectable warning surface as supplied by ADA Solutions, Inc. or approved equal. Printed 1121/2015 www.C1tyo1RC.us Page{of 9 Itam r—r-7'7 Project* DRC2013-00583 DRC2013-00941, DRC2013-00942, DRC2014-00358 Project Name: Creative Design Associates Location: 6910 ARCHIBALD AVE-020213161-0000 Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Minor Exception,Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.- 8 En-gineering Serylges Devartment 4. Provide a final drainage report to determine: a. Storm water flows for the fully developed tributary area north of the Archibald/Monte Vista Intersection, for both the 25-year and 100-year storm events, with nodes at the proposed Inlet facility and all catch basins. b. Include a preliminary water surface profile gradient analysis of the proposed pipe to determine if the drop in the existing pipe under Monte Vista Avenue has a negative impact on the hydraulic grade line of the proposed storm drain pipe. c. Determine the extent of ponding as a result of relocating the pipe inlet headwall and propose alternatives to direct overflows to Archibald Avenue without impacting adjacent properties. d. Confirm that 0100 will remain within the street on Archibald (top of curb). 5. Provide confirmation from Cucamonga Valley Water District that a 1-foot separation between the bottom of a sewer line and the top of a storm drain is acceptable, 6. The following impact fees shall be paid upon issuance of building permit (fees subject to change annually with a scheduled increase May 1, 2015): a. Transportation Fee $ 9,002.00 b. General Drainage Fee $ 19,382.001 per net acre c. Beautification Fee $ 0.201 SF d. Park Fees $4,396.00 e. Library Impact Fee $ 576.98 f. Animal Center Impact Fee $ 124.29 g. Police Impact Fee $ 172.00 7. Gated entrance shall be in accordance with the City's "Residential Project Gated Entrance Design Guide" standard. 8. Private storm drains connecting to the public storm drain will need to be shown on the public improvement plans, but they shall be labeled 'private" and their sizing will be reviewed by the Building and Safety Division in plan check. 9. All pertinent conditions of approval of Planning Commission Resolution No. 07-59 approving Tentative Tract Map 17444 shall apply. 10. Structures within the vicinity of the City's storm drain shall provide deepened footings so as to avoid a surcharge on the storm drain. E. grading Section Printed:112112015 www.CltyofRC.us Page 5 of 4 Project#: DRC2013-00683 DRC2013-00941, DRC2013-00942, DRC2014-00358 Project Name: Creative Design Associates Location: 6910 ARCHIBALD AVE-020213161-0000 Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: E. Gradi!na Section 1. The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the structural storm water treatment devices (including but not limited to the infiltration trenches) to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project All costs associated with the structural storm water treatment devices are the responsibility of the land owner. 2. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, on the permitted set of grading and drainage plans the engineer of record shall provide a definition (including an inset exhibit if necessary) defining the term "Distributed Area". 3. Prior to issuance of a grading permit should a conflict occur between the Final Project-Specific Water Quality Management Plan Site and Drainage Plan and the final Project Landscaping Plans, the project improvements shown on the Final Project-Specific Water Quality Management Plan Site and Drainage Plan shall govem. 4. Prior to issuance of a grading permit a copy of the final project landscaping submitted as a reference set of plans with the permitted set of precise grading radin p plans for r g plan(r shall d shall be Included In the final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan. review and 5. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. S. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of Califomia to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report review. 7. A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 8. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 9. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer. 10. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit 11. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, that plan shall be a separate plan/permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit Pdnted:1121/2015 www.C40fRC.us Page 9 of 9 Project* DRC2013.00583 DRC2013-00941, DRC2013-00942, DRC2014-00358 Project Name: Creative Design Associates Location: 6910 ARCHIBALD AVE-020213161-0000 Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT; E. Grading Section 12. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-sfte drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on-site to water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. Ail reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. 13. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage easements prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 14. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall on property line or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s)to be constructed offset from the property line. 15. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on-site construction where possible, and provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 16. All slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way or adjacent private property. 17. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the, latest adopted California Plumbing Code. 18. Private streets for multifamily developments will include street plans as part of the Grading and Drainage Plan set. Plan view to show typical street sections. Profile view to show centerline and top of curb profiles. 19. The maximum parking stall gradient is 5 percent Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current adopted Califomia Building Code. 20. Roof storm water is not permitted to flow over the public parkway and shall be directed to an under parkway culvert per City of Rancho Cucamonga requirements prior to issuance of a grading permit 21. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond project boundary. 22. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety official. 23. This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted Califomia Building Code. 24. The precise grading and drainage plan shall follow time format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout"Information for Grading Plans and Permit". Printed:112112015 WWW.CityotRC.us Page I or 9 Project#: ORC2013-00583 DRC2013-00941, DRC2013-00942, ORC2014-00358 Project Name: Creative Design Associates Location: 6910 ARCHIBALD AVE-020213161-0000 Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. E. Gradin S c !on 25. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre-grading meeting Is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shalt call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continufng grading operations: 1) The bottom of the over-excavation; 11) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; III) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the Issuance of a building permit. 26. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) best management practices (BMP)devices. 27. The Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 28. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment best management practices (BMP) devices as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan shall be provided for by CC&R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit Said CCBR's and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. 29. Prior to issuance of a grading permit on the final grading and drainage plan the applicant shall clearly show an emergency overflow drainage path should the proposed storm drain pipe become clogged/plugged with debris. The emergency overflow path shall not flood any residential structures. 30. The Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) has been deemed "Acceptable". Prior to the issuance of a grading permit a final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official. 31. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 32. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number(WDID). 33. A Grading Bond will be required to be submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department Official for review and approval prior to issuance of a Grading Permit. Printed:1/2V2015 www.CityaIRC.us Page a or 9 Project A DRC2013-00583 DRC2013-00941, DRC2013-00942, DRC2014-00358 Project Name: Creative Design Associates Location: 6910 ARCHIBALD AVE-020213161-000D Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: E. rgradIUML&cUon 34. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment best management ag practices (BMP) devices, as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan, shall be provided for by CC&R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the issuance a grading permit Said CC&R's and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. 35. Prior to issuance of a wall permit, on engineered combination garden/retaining wails along the property boundary the structural calculations for the wall shall assume a level toe/heel at the adjacent off-site property(i.e. a manufactured slope Is not present). 36. Flow lines steeper than 6 percent could be erosive. The applicant shall provide hard lined gutters and swales where concentrated Rows exceed 3fps, and anywhere that flow lines exceed 10 percent 37. Prior to removing fences or walls along common lot lines and prior to constructing walls along common lot lines the applicant shall provide a letter from the adjacent property owner(s) allow work on the adjacent property. ing 38. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the Erosion Control Plan shall show a City required dust control sign within 50-feet of the project construction entrance and a second dust control sign shalt be placed within 50-feet of the Chapparal Heights Mobile Home Park entrance. 39. All underground vaults within the proposed construction area on the Chapparal Heights Mobil Home Park which are not traffic rated shall be shown on the permitted set of grading and drainage plans to be replaced with traffic rated vaults prior to the issuance of a grading permit 40. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the engineer of record shall submit with the private domestic water and sewer plans, calculations showing the proposed sewer line placed near and under the proposed storm water quality infiltration trenches will withstand any buoyance Issues created from the proximity to the said infiltration trenches. 41. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Erosion Control Plan shall show the proj construction entrance fronting directly on a public street Construction access from the Ch ppa al Heights Mobile Home Park shall not be permitted. 42. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit that applicant shall make a good faith effort in writing, and show on the permitte grading and drainge plan, work to be completed on the Chapparal Heights Mobile Home Park including, but not limited to, refinishing the dralnage Inlet on the Chapparal Heights Mobile Home Park property along with any other construction requirements as shown on the approved conceptual grading and drainage plan dated June 03, 2014. Printed:1/2 112 0 1 6 www.CityafRC.us Page 9 c!9 RESOLUTION NO. 15-16 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA,APPROVING MINOR EXCEPTION ORC2014-00358,A REQUEST FOR UP TO 8-FOOT HIGH WALLS IN THE PRIVATE AREAS SEPARATING UNITS 11112 AND UNITS 10113 AND BETWEEN THE PROJECT SITE AND MOBILE HOME PARK TO THE WEST DUE TO A 2-FOOT GRADE DIFFERENCE IN CONJUNCTION WITH DESIGN REVIEW DRC2013-00583 FOR THE SITE PLAN AND DESIGN REVIEW OF A 13 UNIT DETACHED CONDOMINIUM PROJECT ON 2.17 ACRES OF LAND IN THE LOW MEDIUM (LM) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT(4-8 DWELLING UNITS PERACRE)FOR A SITE LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND 150 FEET NORTH OF MONTE VISTA STREET—APN: 202-131-27, 61 AND 62 A. Recitals. 1. Creative Design Associates filed an application for the approval of Minor Exception DRC2014-00358 as described In the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Minor Exception request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 11th day of February 2015 the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequfsites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it Is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on February 11, 2015, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a property located on the west side of Archibald Avenue and 150 feet north of Monte Vista Street in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District; and b. The 2.17 acre site is comprised of three parcels and slopes gently to the southeast. The site contains 45 trees of various species and the remnants of a stone lined drainage channel. The adjacent mobile home park has an open storm drain which currently surface drains across the site and enters the public storm drain system at the southern boundary of the site; and C. To the north and west is a mobile home park within the Low Medium (LM) Residential District. To the south are single-family residences within the Medium (M) Residential District; and to the east, across Archibald Avenue, is a multi-family project within the Medium (M) Residential District; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-16 DRC2014-00356 CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES FEBRUARY 11, 2015 Page 2 d. The project complies with all related development criteria of the Low Medium (M) Residential District including project density, building design,setbacks,parking,private and common open space areas, landscape coverage and recreation facilities. The project, though, requires the approval of two separate Minor Exceptions for wall height. The subject Minor Exception is due to grade differences between the private yards areas on the project site and a grade difference between the project site and the neighboring mobile home park. The second Minor exception (DRC2014-00941)is to attenuate vehicle noise from Archibald Avenue. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above,this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The Minor Exception is consistent with the General Plan or any applicable specific plan or Development Agreement. The proposed increase in wall height due to a grade difference between adjacent private yard areas and neighboring project sites is consistent with the residential nature of the Development District in which the site is located.The additional wall height will provide privacy and security between the adjacent yard areas and neighboring project sites. b. The proposed development is compatible with existing and proposed land uses In the surrounding area. The proposed project is compatible with the surrounding land uses in that the project site is within the Low Medium (LM) Residential District, which permits the development of single and multi-family residences.Additionally,there is residential development to the north,south and west of the project site and to the east across Archibald Avenue increased wall heights are common where there is a grade difference between adjacent yard areas and neighboring project sites. C. The proposed exception to the speck development standard(s)Is necessary to allow creative design solutions compatible with the desires of the community and/or to accommodate unique site conditions. There is an approximately 2-foot grade difference between adjacent private yards area and neighboring project sites. The additional wall height will allow residents to secure their private yard areas with a minimum 6-foot high wall. d. The granting of the Minor Exception will not constitute a grant of special privilege Inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district, and will not be detrimental to public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious properties or improvements in the vicinity. It is common practice to approve Minor Exceptions for wall height within the residential districts when there is a grade difference between adjacent yard areas and project sites. The additional wall height will only be visible to the residents living directly adjacent to the walls and will not negatively impact other home owners in the area. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the application, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application,the Planning Commission finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in connection with the review and approval of this application based upon the following findings and determinations: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act(°CEQA")and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration on October 10, 2007 in connection with the City's approval of SUBTT17444. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required in connection with PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-16 DRC2014-00358 CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES FEBRUARY 11, 2015 Page 3 subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project unless:(1)substantial changes are proposed to the project that indicate new or more severe impacts on the environment;(Ii)substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the project was previously reviewed that indicates new or more severe environmental impacts; or(Ili)new important information shows the project will have new or more severe impacts than previously considered;or(iv)additional mitigation measures are now feasible to reduce impacts or different mitigation measures can be imposed ti substantially reduce Impacts. b. The Planning Commission finds,in connection with the Minor Exception DRC2014- 00358,that substantial changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project have not occurred which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. The general layout and number of units have not changed from the original environmental determination. Staff further finds that the project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration, not have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less than significant, as the project layout and design have not changed since the original environmental determination. C. Based on these findings and all evidence in the record,the Planning Commission concurs with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is required pursuant to CEQA in connection with the City's consideration of the current application. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached standard conditions incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) Approval is for a Minor Exception for up to 8-foot high wails in the private areas separating Units 11/12 and Units 10/13 and between the project site and Mobile Home Park to the west related to the development of a 13-unit detached condominium project located on the west side of Archibald Avenue and 150 feet north of Monte Vista Street -APN: 202-131-27, 61 and 62. 2) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, State Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniform Building Code, or any other City Ordinances. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2015. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA i PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-16 DRC2014-00358 CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES FEBRUARY 11, 2015 Page 4 BY: Ravenel Wimberly, Chairman ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced,passed,and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of February 2015, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Conditions of Approval P.WCH Cua,uun°°A Community 09ve10pment Department Project* DRC2013-00583 DRC2013-00941, DRC2013-00942, DRC2014-00358 Project Name: Creative Design Associates Location: 6910 ARCHIBALD AVE-020213161-0000 Project Type. Design Review Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: A. Planning 06PSirtment 1. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 2. Construct block walls between homes (i.e., along Interior side and rear property lines), rather than wood fencing for permanence, durability, and design consistency. 3. All building numbers and Individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination and in conformance with Building and Safety Services Department standards, the Municipal Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department(RCFD)Standards. 4. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Services Department and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the Issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer.' The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning Department a list of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes. 5. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all lots for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department approval; including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing. 6. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, the Development Code regulations, the Specific Plan, Master Plan and the Community Plan ' 7. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be property owner. homeowners' association, or other means acceptable p to then Cit maintained of of thiselandscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 8. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director and Police Department (909-477-2800 of Permits. Such plan shall indicate style, Illumination, location, he ghtri and omethod thes ofa shielding nce Building as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. Panted;1/21/2015 Www-RYO}RC.us I Project#: ORC2013-00583 DR102013-00941, DRC2013-00942, DRC2014-00358 Project Name: Creative Design Associates Location: 6910 ARCHIBALD AVE-020213181-0000 Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.- A. Planning De artm n 9. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double wall condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owners at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/fences along the project perimeter. 10. For residential development, return walls and comer side walls shall be decorative masonry. 11. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment It located In public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Services Department 12. Landscaping and Irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of water efficient landscaping per Development Code Chapter 17.82. 13. For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way. All landscaped areas shall be ,kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage. 14. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits for the development or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. For development occurring in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, the landscape plans will also be reviewed by Fire Construction Services. 15. Landscaping and Irrigation systems required to be Installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 16. A minimum of trees per gross acre, comprised of the following sizes, shall be provided Within the project: percent - 48-inch box or larger percent - 36-Inch box or larger, percent-24-Inch box or larger, percent- 15-gallon, and percent-5 gallon. 17. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking stalls. 18. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Services Department Printed:1/21/2015 www.CltyofRC.us Page 2 of 9 Project#: DRC2013-00683 DRC2013-00941, DRC2013-00942, DRC2014-00358 Project Name: Creative Design Associates Location: 6910 ARCH IBALD AVE-020213161-0000 Project Type: Design Revlew Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: A. Planning Department 19. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, Its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attomey's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at Its sole discretion, participate at Its own expense In the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 20. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. or Approval Letter, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 21. Crime Free Multi-Family Housing Program - The owner shall cause the manager and any resident manager to complete the training for and enroll the project in the San Bernardino County Crime Free Mulb-Family Housing Program. 22. The applicant shall be required to pay Califomia Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption and Mitigated Negative Declaration fee In the amount of $2,260.00. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing. 23. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 24. All units shall be provided with garage door openers If driveways are less than 18 feet in depth from back of sidewalk. 25. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 17 feet long with a required 1-foot overhang (e.g., over a curb stop). 28. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. 27. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaceslplazasl recreational uses. 28. The applicant shall submit certification from an acoustical engineer that all recommendations of the acoustical report were implemented In construction, including measurements of interior and exterior noise levels to document compliance with City standards. Certification shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department and the Planning Department prior to final occupancy release of the affected homes. Printed:112112015 WWW.C1tVofRC.us Page 3 of 9 Project#: DRC2013-00583 DRC2013-00941, DRC2013-00942, DRC2014-00358 Project Name: Creative Design Associates Location: 6910 ARCHIBALD AVE-020213161-0000 Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.- A. PIgnrilwDeRartmenj 29. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. The final report shall discuss the level of Interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and construction techniques provided, and if appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures. The building plans will be checked far conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report. 30. Mitigation measures are required for the project The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Planning Director in the amount of $729 prior to the Issuance of Building Permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit 31. In those Instances requiring tong term monitoring (i.e. beyond final certificate of occupancy), the applicant shall provide a written monitoring and reporting program to the Planning Director prior to issuance of Building Permits. Said program shall identify the reporter as an Individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. B. Engineering ServIces Department 1. Install traffic signal at Intersection of Archibald Avenue and Victoria Streetfproject entry. a. Provide easements as needed for traffic signal equipment and maintenance on private drive aisle. b. Upon completion of the joint use driveway and the traffic signal installation, the existing driveway to the mobile home park shall be closed and reconstructed with curb, gutter, sidewalk and street trees to the satisfaction of the mobile home park and the City Engineer. c. The developer shall , receive credit against and reimbursement of costs in excess of the Transportation Development Fee In conformance with City Policy. If the developer faits to submit far said reimbursement agreement within 6 months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. 2. Provide two(2) 9500 Lumens LED street lights. 3. Verify existing access ramps on Archibald Avenue and Monte Vista for conformance to ADA requirements and to City Std. 102. Otherwise reconstruct access ramps to current City Sid. 100-B and 102 and have a surface applied truncated dome detectable warning surface as supplied by ADA Solutions, Inc. or approved equal. Printed:1/21 12 01 5 WWW.C1ty01Rc.us Page 4 or 9 Project#: DRC2013-00583 DRC2013-00941, DRC2013-00942, DRC2014-00358 Project Name: Creative Design Associates Location: 6910 ARCHIBALD AVE -020213161-0000 Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Minor Exception,Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT B. Engineering ervic Department 4. Provide a final drainage report to determine: a. Storm water flows for the fully developed tributary area north of the Archibald/Monte Vista intersection, for both the 25-year and 100-year storm events, with nodes at the proposed inlet facility and all catch basins. b. Include a preliminary water surface profile gradient analysis of the proposed pipe to determine if the drop in the existing pipe under Monte Vista Avenue has a negative impact on the hydraulic grade line of the proposed storm drain pipe. c. Determine the extent of ponding as a result of relocating the pipe inlet headwall and alternatives to direct overflows to Archibald Avenue without impacting adjacent properties. propose d. Confirm that Q100 will remain within the.street on Archibald(top of curb). 5. Provide confirmation from Cucamonga Valley Water District that a 1-foot separation between the bottom of a sewer line and the top of a storm drain is acceptable, 6. The following impact fees shall be paid upon issuance of building permit (fees subject to change annually with a scheduled increase May 1, 2015): a. Transportation Fee $ 9,002.00 In. General Drainage Fee $ 19,382.00/per net acre c. Beautification Fee $ 0.20/SF d. Park Fees $4,396.00 e. Library Impact Fee $ 576.98 f. Animal Center Impact Fee $ 124.29 g. Police Impact Fee $ 172.00 7. Gated entrance shall be in accordance with the City's "Residential project Gated Entrance Design Guide°standard. 8. Private storm drains connecting to the public storm drain will need to be shown on the public improvement plans, but they shall be labeled "private" and their sizing will be reviewed by the Building and Safety Division in plan check. 9. All pertinent conditions of approval of Planning Commission Resolution No. 07-59 approving Tentative Tract Map 17444 shall apply. 10. Structures within the vicinity of the City's storm drain shall provide deepened footings so as to avoid a surcharge on the storm drain. E. Grading Section Printed:IW12015 v WWZtyarRC,us Pape 5 of 9 a Project# DRC2013-00583 DRC2013-00941, DRC2013-00942, DRC2014-00358 Project Name: Creative Design Associates Location: 6910 ARCHIBALD AVE-020213161-0000 Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Minor Exception,Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.- E. Gra in tt! n 1. The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the structural storm water treatment devices (including but not limited to the infiltration trenches) to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the structural storm water treatment devices are the responsibility of the land owner. 2. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, on the permitted set of grading and drainage plans the engineer of record shall provide a definition (including an inset exhibit if necessary) defining the term "Distributed Area". 3. Prior to Issuance of a grading permit should a conflict occur between the Final Project Specific Water Quality Management Plan Site and Drainage Plan and the final Project landscaping Plans, the project improvements shown on the Final Project-Specific Water Quality Management Plan Site and Drainage Plan shall govern. 4. Prior to Issuance of a grading permit a copy of the final project landscaping plan(s) shall be submitted as a reference set of plans with the permitted set of precise grading plans for review and shall be included in the final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan. 5. Grading of the subject property shall be In accordance with current adopted California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 6. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 7. A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. S. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 9. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer. 10. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 11. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, that plan shall be a separate planlpermit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. Printed:1/21/2016 www.C40mc.tis Page a of 2 Project#: DRC2013-00683 DRC2013-00941, DRC2013-00942, DRC2014-00358 Project Name: Creative Design Associates Location: 6910 ARCHIBALD AVE-020213161-0000 Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Minor Exception,Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: E. r din Ion 12. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on-site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit_ All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. 13. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage easements prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 14. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall on property line or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. 15. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on-site construction where possible, and provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 16. All slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way or adjacent private property. 17. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the, latest adopted California Plumbing Code. 18. Prlva}e streets for multifamily developments will include street plans as part of the Grading and Drainage Plan set. Plan view to show typical street sections. Profile view to show centerline and top of curb profiles. 19. The maximum parking stall gradient is 5 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current adopted California Building Code. 20. Roof storm water is not permitted to flow over the public parkway and shall be directed to an under parkway culvert per City of Rancho Cucamonga requirements prior to issuance of a grading permit. 21. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond project boundary. 22. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official. 23. This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 24. The precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout"information for Grading Plans and Permit". Printed:112112als WWw.CItyQ RC.us Page 7 or 9 Project#: DRC2013-00583 DRC2013-00941, DRC2013-00942, DRC2014-00358 Project Name: Creative Design Associates Location: 6910 ARCHIBALD AVE-020213161-0000 Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: E. GE@d1nq Section 25. Grading Inspections. a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector, b) The grading contractor shall call Into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading Inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the aver-excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to Issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the Issuance of a building permit. 26. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) best management practices (BMP) devices. 27. The Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 28. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment best management practices (BMP) devices as provided for In the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan shall be provided for by CC&R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the Issuance of a grading permit Said CCSR's andlor deeds shall be included In the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. 29. Prior to issuance of a grading permit on the final grading and drainage plan the applicant shall clearly show an emergency overflow drainage path should the proposed storm drain pipe become clogged/plugged with debris. The emergency overflow path shall not flood any residential structures. 30. The Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) has been deemed "Acceptable". Prior to the issuance of a grading permit a final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official. 31. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 32. Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number(WDID). 33. A Grading Bond will be required to be submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department Official for review and approval prior to issuance of a Grading Permit. Printed:1121/2015 www.CityotRC.us Page 8 of 0 Project#: DRC2013-00583 DRC2013-00941, DRC2013-00942, DRC2014-00358 Project Name: Creative Design Associates Location: 6910 ARCHIBALD AVE-020213161-0000 Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Minor Exception,Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.- E. Grading Section 34. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all storm water quality structuralltreatment best management practices (BMp) devices, as provided for in the project's Storm Water Qua* Management Plan, shall be provided for by CCBR's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the issuance a grading permit. Said CC&R's and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. 35. Prior to issuance of a wall permit, on engineered combination gardenlretaining walls along the property boundary the structural calculations for the wall shall assume a level toe/heel at the adjacent oft`-site property(i.e. a manufactured slope is not present). 36. Flow lines steeper than 6 percent could be erosive. The applicant shall provide hard lined gutters and swales where concentrated flows exceed 3fps, and anywhere that flow lines exceed 10 percent 37. Prior to removing fences or walls along common lot lines and prior to constructing walls along common lot lines the applicant shall provide a letter from the adjacent property owner(s) allowing work on the adjacent property. 38. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the Erosion Control Plan shall show a City required dust control sign within 50-feet of the project construction entrance and a second dust control sign shall be placed within 50-feet of the Chapparal Heights Mobile Home Park entrance. 39. All underground vaults within the proposed construction area on the Chapparal Heights Mobil Home Park which are not traffic rated shall be shown on the permitted set of grading and drainage plans to be replaced with traffic rated vaults prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 40. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the engineer of record shall submit with the private domestic water and sewer plans, calculations showing the proposed sewer line placed near and under the proposed storm water quality infiltration trenches will withstand any buoyance issues created from the proximity to the said infiltration trenches. 41. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Erosion Control Plan shall show the project construction entrance fronting directly on a public street. Construction access from the Chapparal Heights Mobile Home Park shall not be permitted. 42. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit that applicant shall make a good faith effort in writing, and show on the permitte grading and drainge plan, work to be completed on the Chapparal Heights Mobile Home Park including, but not limited to, refinishing the drainage inlet on the Chapparal Heights Mobile Home Park property along with any other construction requirements as shown on the approved conceptual grading and drainage plan dated June 03,2014. Printed:1/2112015 www.C1tylo}RC.us Page 9 of 9 RESOLUTION NO. 15-17 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2013-00942, A REQUEST TO REMOVE 45 TREES IN CONNECTION WITH A DESIGN REVIEW(DRC2013-00583)FOR A SITE PLAN AND DESIGN REVIEW OF A 13-UNIT DETACHED CONDOMINIUM PROJECT ON 2.17. ACRES IN THE LOW MEDIUM (LM) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT(4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE)FORA SITE LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND 150 FEET NORTH OF MONTE VISTA STREET—APN: 202-131-27, 61 AND 62 A. Recitals. 1. Creative Design Associates has filed an application for the approval of Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00942 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tree Removal Permit request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 11 th day of February 2015 the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals. Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on February 11, 2015, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a property located on the west side of Archibald Avenue and 150 feet north of Monte Vista Street in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District; and b. The 2.17 acre site is comprised of three parcels and slopes gently to the southeast. The site contains 45 trees of various species and the remnants of a stone lined drainage channel. The adjacent mobile home park has an open storm drain which currently surface drains across the site and enters the public storm drain system at the southern boundary of the site; and C. To the north and west is a mobile home park within the Low Medium (LM) Residential District.To the south are single-family residences within the Medium(M)Development District: and,to the east, across Archibald Avenue, is a multi family project within the Medium (M) Residential District; and d. A Tree Removal Permit has been submitted for the removal of 45 trees related to the design review of a 13-unit detached condominium project(DRC2013-00583).An Arborist Report was completed for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444 (John Gonzalez; May 17, 2005) which PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-17 DRC2013-00942 CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES FEBRUARY 11, 2015 Page 2 reviewed the condition of each tree on the project site.The report concluded that all but 6 trees were in poor condition and should be removed.The report also stated that the 6 trees that were classified as being in fair to good condition should be considered for preservation if they did not conflict with the proposed onsite Improvements. The layout of the project prevents preserving these 6 trees healthy trees; and e. The Development Code requires that new developments plant 40 trees per acre,of which 90-percent must be 15-gallon size trees and 10-percent must be 24-inch box size trees.The proposed Landscape Plan includes 92 new trees,5 trees in excess of the minimum requirement,of which 43 percent will be 24-inch box size trees. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The removal of the trees is necessary due to the condition of the trees related to disease, danger of collapse, proximity to an existing structure, or interference with utility services. The Arborist Report prepared for the project on May 17, 2005 concluded that all but 6 of the trees are in poor condition and should be removed. The required grading and site layout prevent preserving the 6 healthy trees. b. The removal of the trees is necessary in order to construct improvements which will allow economic enjoyment of the property. The trees conflict with the construction of onsite improvements related to the development of the proposed 13-unit multi-family development. C. The removal of the trees will not negatively Impact the neighborhood, the established character of the area and property values.There are a large number of mature trees in the surrounding area.The removal of the onsite trees will have a minimal Impact on the surrounding area as the 45 trees slated for removal will be mitigated by the number of trees that will be planted as part of the project. The Development Code requires that new developments plant 40 trees per acre, of which 90-percent must be 15-gallon size trees and 10-percent must be 24-inch box size trees.The Landscape Plan for the project includes 92 new trees, 5 trees in excess of the minimum requirement, of which 43 percent will be 24-inch box size trees. d. The removal of the trees is necessary to construct required improvements within the public street right-of-way or within a flood control or utility right-of-way.There are four trees to be removed are within the public right-of-way that will replaced by new street trees. e. The trees cannot be preserved through pruning and proper maintenance or relocation_All but 6 of the trees slated for removal have been determined by the Arborist Report to be in poor condition. The 6 healthy trees conflict with the proposed onsite improvements. f. The trees do not constitute a significant natural resource in the city.All but 6 of the trees are in poor condition.The trees will be replaced as part of the project with a greater number of trees, g. Removal of the trees lh not restricted by a Specific Plan,Community Plan,condition of approval, or designation as a Historic Landmark_ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-17 DRC2013-00942 CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES FEBRUARY 11, 2015 Page 3 h. Every effort has been made to incorporate the trees into the design of the project and the only appropriate alternative is the removal of the trees. The condition of the trees and the proposed site and grading plans prevent maintaining the trees in their present location or from relocating the trees on site. I. The removal of the trees will not have a negative impact on the health, safety, or viability of surrounding trees, nor will it negatively impact the aesthetics or general welfare of the surrounding area.Only 6 of the 45 trees slated for removal have been determined to be healthy.Any negative impact created by the removal of the 6 healthy trees will be mitigated by the 92 new trees that will be planted as part of the project. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the application, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application,the Planning Commission finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in connection with the review and approval of this application based upon the following findings and determinations: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act("CEQA")and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City adopted A Mitigated Negativd Declaration on October 10, 2007 in connection with the City's approval of SUBTT17444. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project unless: (1) substantial changes are proposed to the project that indicate new or more severe impacts on the environment; (ii)substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the project was previously reviewed that indicates new or more severe environmental impacts; or(iii) new important information shows the project will have new or more severe impacts than previously considered;or(iv)additional mitigation measures are now feasible to reduce impacts or different mitigation measures can be imposed to substantially reduce impacts. b. The Planning Commission finds, in connection with the Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00942, that substantial changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project have not occurred which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. The general layout and number of units have not changed from the original environmental determination. Staff further finds that the project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration, not have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less than significant, as the project layout and design have not changed since the original environmental determination. C. Based on these findings and all evidence in the record,the Planning Commission concurs with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is required pursuant to CEQA in connection with the City's consideration of the current application. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached standard conditions incorporated herein by this reference. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-17 DRC2013-00942 CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES FEBRUARY 11, 2015 Page 4 Planning Department 1) Approval is for the removal of 45 trees related to the development of a 13 unit detached condominium project located on the west side of Archibald Avenue and 150 feet north of Monte Vista Street - APN: 202-131-27, 61 and fit. 2) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, State Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniform Building Code, or any other City Ordinances. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2015. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Ravenel Wimberly, Chairman ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced,passed,and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of February 2015, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Conditions of Approval RakCUCA ONGA Community Development Department Project#: DRC2013.00583 DRC2013-00941, DRC2013-00942, DRC2014-00358 Project Name: Creative Design Associates Location: 6910 ARCHIBALD AVE-020213161-0000 Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.- A. Planning DeRartment 1. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 2. Construct block walls between homes (i.e., along interior side and rear property lines), rather than wood fencing for permanence, durability, and design consistency. 3. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, Including proper illumination and in conformance with Building and Safety Services Department standards, the Municipal Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department(RCFD)Standards. 4. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Services Department and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the Issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer. The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning Department a list of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes. 5. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all lots for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department approval; including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing. 6. The site shall be developed and maintained In accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, the Development Code regulations, the Specific Plan, Master Plan and the Community Plan 7. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 8. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director and Police Department (909-477-2800) prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. Prtnled:1/2112015 www.C1tyorRC us Project#: DRC2013-00583 DRC2013-00941, DRC2013-00942, DRC2014-00358 Project Name: Creative Design Associates Location: 8910 ARCHIBALD AVE-020213161-0000 Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Minor Exception,Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.- A. Planning-DOpartmen 9. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double wall condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owners at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing wallsifences along the project perimeter. 10. For residential development, return walls and comer side walls shall be decorative masonry. 11. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment If located In public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Services Department. 12. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of water efficient landscaping per Development Code Chapter 17.82. 13. For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way. All landscaped areas shall be .kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage. 14. A detailed landscape and Irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits for the development or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. For development occurring in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, the landscape plans will also be reviewed by Fire Construction Services. 15. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 16. A minimum of trees per gross acre, comprised of the following sizes, shall be provided within the project: percent - 48-inch box or larger percent - 36-inch box or larger, percent-24-inch box or larger, percent-15-gallon,and percent-5 gallon. 17. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking stalls. 18. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Services Department Printed:1/211201 S www.C1lyo1RC.us Page 2 of 9 I+n_ P COC. Project* DRC2013-00583 DRC2013-00941, DRC2013-00942, DRC2014-00358 Project Name: Creative Design Associates Location: 6910 ARCHIBALD AVE-020213161-0000 Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. A. Planning Department 19. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorneys fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense In the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 20. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. or Approval Letter, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 21. Crime Free Multl-Family Housing Program - The owner shall cause the manager and any resident manager to complete the training for and enroll the project in the San Bernardino County Crime Free Multi-Family Housing Program. 22. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption and Mitigated Negative Declaration fee in the amount of $2,260.00. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing. 23. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not Issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 24. All units shall be provided with garage door openers if driveways are less than 18 feet in depth from back of sidewalk. 25. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 17 feet long with a required 14bot overhang (e.g., over a curb stop). 28. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. 27. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/plazas/ recreational uses. 28. The applicant shall submit certification from an acoustical engineer that all recommendations of the acoustical report were implemented in construction, including measurements of interior and exterior noise levels to document compliance with City standards. Certification shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department and the Planning Department prior to final occupancy release of the affected homes. www.Utyo1RC.us Printed:112112015 Pays 3 0!9 Project#: DRC2013-00583 DRC2013-00941, DRC2013-00942, ❑RC2014-00358 Project Name: Creative Design Associates Location: 6910 ARCHIBALD AVE-020213 161-0000 Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Minor Exception, 'Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: A. Planning Department 29. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and construction techniques provided, and if appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures. The building plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report. 30. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Planning Director in the amount of $729 prior to the issuance of Building Permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit. 31. In those Instances requiring long term monitoring (i.e. beyond final certificate of occupancy), the applicant shall provide a written monitoring and reporting program to the Planning Director prior to Issuance of Building Permits. Said program shall Identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. B. Engineering Services Dooldiinent 1. Install traffic signal at intersection of Archibald Avenue and Victoria Street/project entry. a. Provide easements as needed for traffic signal equipment and maintenance on private drive aisle. b. Upon completion of the joint use driveway and the traffic slgnai installation, the existing driveway to the mobile home park shall be closed and reconstructed with curb, gutter, sidewalk and street trees to the satisfaction of the mobile home park and the City Engineer. c. The developer shall receive credit against and reimbursement of costs In excess of the Transportation Development Fee In conformance with City Policy. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within 6 months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. 2. Provide two(2)9s00 Lumens LED street lights. 3. Verify existing access ramps on Archibald Avenue and Monte Vista for conformance to ADA requirements and to City Std. 102. Otherwise reconstruct access ramps to current City Std. 100-B and 102 and have a surface applied truncated dome detectable warning surface as supplied by ADA Solutions, Inc. or approved equal. usCityoiRC. Printed:1I211I015 www. Papa 4 of 9 04-....., r1 Eno project#: ORC2013-00583 DRC2013-00941, DRC2013-00942, DRC2014-00358 Project Name: Creative Design Associates Location: 6910 ARCHIBALD AVE-020213161-0000 Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Minor Exception,Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.- R. En-oln2ering ServiResa nt 4. Provide a final drainage report to determine: a. Storm water flows for the fully developed tributary area north of the Archibald/Monte Vista Intersection, for both the 25-year and 100-year storm events, with nodes at the proposed inlet facility and all catch basins. b. Include a preliminary water surface profiie gradient analysis of the proposed pipe to determine if the drop in the existing plpe under Monte Vista Avenue has a negative impact on the hydraulic grade line of the proposed storm drain pipe. c. Determine the extent of ponding as a result of relocating the pipe inlet headwall and propose altematives to direct overflows to Archibald Avenue without impacting adjacent properties. d. Confirm that 0100 will remain within the street on Archibald(top of curb). 5. Provide confirmation from Cucamonga Valley Water District that a 1-foot separation between the bottom of a sewer line and the top of a storm drain is acceptable, 8. The following impact fees shall be paid upon issuance of building permit (fees subject to change annually with a scheduled increase May 1, 2015): a. Transportation Fee $9,002.00 b. General Drainage Fee $ 19,382.00/per net acre c. Beautification Fee $0.20/SF d. Park Fees $4,396.00 e. Library Impact Fee $ 576.98 f Animal Center Impact Fee $ 124.29 g. Police Impact Fee $ 172.00 7. Gated entrance shall be in accordance with the City's "Residential Project Gated Entrance Design Guide"standard. 8. Private storm drains connecting to the public storm drain will need to be shown on the public improvement plans, but they shall be labeled "private" and their sizing will be reviewed by the Building and Safety Division in plan check. 9. All pertinent conditions of approval of Planning Commission Resolution No. 07-59 approving Tentative Tract Map 17444 shall apply. 10. Structures within the vicinity of the City's storm drain shall provide deepened footings so as to avoid a surcharge on the storm drain. E. Grading Se tion Printed:1121/2015 www.CllyofRC.u9 Page 5of9 i+nr r Coo Project#: DRC2013-00583 ORC2013-00941, DRC2013-00942, DRC2014-00358 Project Name: Creative Design Associates Location: 6910 ARCHIBALD AVE-020213161-0000 Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Minor Exception,Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: E. Gradina_Ssction 1. The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the structural storm water treatment devices (including but not limited to the infiltration trenches) to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the structural storm water treatment devices are the responsibility of the land owner. 2. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, on the permitted set of grading and drainage plans the engineer of record shall provide a definition (including an inset exhibit if necessary) defining the term "Dlstrlbuted Area". 3. Prior to issuance of a grading permit should a conflict occur between the Final Project-Specific Water Quality Management Plan Site and Drainage Plan and the final Project Landscaping Plans, the project Improvements shown on the Final Project-Specific Water Quality Management Plan Site and Drainage Plan shall govern. 4. Prior to issuance of a grading permit a copy of the final project landscaping plan(s) shall be submitted as a reference set of plans with the permitted set of precise grading plans for review and shall be included In the final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan. 5. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan.. 6. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 7. A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 8. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 9. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where Improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer. 10. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 11. If a Rough Grading and Drainage PIanlPermit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, that plan shall be a separate plan/permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. Printed:112112015 www.CityofRC us Page 8 of 9 (team r_Finn Project#: DRC2013-00583 DRC2013-00941, DRC2013-00942, DRC2014-00358 Project Name: Creative Design Associates Location: 6910 ARCHIBALD AVE-020213161-0000 Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: E. Grading Section 12. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval far on-site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. 13. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage easements prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 14. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall on property line or provide a detall(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. 16. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on-site construction where possible, and provide details for all worts not covered by City Standard Drawings. 16. All slopes shall be a minimum 24bot offset from the public right of way or adjacent private property. 17. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the, latest adopted California Plumbing Code. 18. Private streets for multifamily developments will Include street plans as part of the Grading and Drainage Plan set. Plan view to show typical street sections. Profile view to show centerline and top of curb profiles. 19. The maximum parking stall gradient is 5 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current adopted California Building Code. 20. Roof storm water is not permitted to flow over the public parkway and shall be directed to an under parkway culvert per City of Rancho Cucamonga requirements prior to issuance of a grading permit. 21. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond project boundary. 22. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official. 23. This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 24. The precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout"Information for Grading Plans and Permir. Printed:112112.015 WWW-Qty01RC.us Pape 7 or 9 itom r—rini Project#. DRC2013-00583 DRC2013-00941, ❑RC2013-00942, DRC2014-00358 Project Name: Creative Design Associates Location: 6910 ARCHIBALD AVE-020213161-0000 Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: E. Gradina Section 25. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: 1) The bottom of the over-excavation; 11) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; III) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Solis Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit 26. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) best management practices (BMP) devices. 27. The Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 28. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all storm water quality structuralltreatment best management practices (BMP) devices as provided for In the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan shall be provided for by CC&R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit Said CC&R's and/or deeds shall be Included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. 29. Prior to issuance of a grading permit on the final grading and drainage plan the applicant shall clearly show an emergency overflow drainage path should the proposed storm drain pipe become clogged/plugged with debris. The emergency overflow path shall not flood any residential structures. 30. The Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) has been deemed "Acceptable". Prior to the issuance of a grading permit a final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official. 31. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Piano shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 32. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number(WDID). 33. A Grading Bond will be required to be submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department Official for review and approval prior to issuance of a Grading Permit. Printed:1/21/2015 www•CI"IRC.tls Page 8vf9 Itam f"_F1n7 Project#: DRC2013-00583 DRC2013-00941, DRC2013-00942, DRC2014-00358 Project Name: Creative Design Associates Location: 6910 ARCHIBALD AVE-020213161-0000 Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: E. Grading Sect[on 34. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment best management practices (BMP) devices, as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan, shall be provided far by CC&R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the issuance a grading permit Said CC&R's and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Duality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. 35. Prior to issuance of a wall permit on engineered combination garden/retaining walls along the property boundary the structural calculations for the wall shall assume a level toe/heel at the adjacent off-site property(i.e. a manufactured slope is not present). 36. Flow lines steeper than 6 percent could be erosive. The applicant shall provide hard lined gutters and swales where concentrated flows exceed 3fps, and anywhere that flow lines exceed 10 percent 37. Prior to removing fences or walls along common [at lines and prior to constructing walls along common lot lines the applicant shall provide a letter from the adjacent property owner(s) allowing work on the adjacent property. 38. Prior to• issuance of a grading permit, the Erosion Control Plan shall show a City required dust control sign within 50-feet of the project construction entrance and a second dust control sign shall be placed within 50-feet of the Chapparal Heights Mobile Home Park entrance. 39. All underground vaults within the proposed construction area on the Chapparal Heights Mobil Home Park which are not traffic rated shall be shown on the permitted set of grading and drainage plans to be replaced with traffic rated vaults prior to the issuance of a grading permit 40. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the engineer of record shall submit with the private domestic water and sewer plans, calculations showing the proposed sewer line placed near and under the proposed storm water quality infiltration trenches will withstand any buoyance issues created from the proximity to the said infiltration trenches. 41. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Erosion Control Plan shall show the project construction entrance fronting directly on a public street Construction access from the Chapparal Heights Mobile Home Park shall not be permitted. 42. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit that applicant shall make a good faith effort in writing, and show on the permitte grading and drainge plan, work to be completed on the Chapparal Heights Mobile Home Park Including, but not limited to, refinishing the drainage inlet on the Chapparal Heights Mobile Home Park property along with any other construction requirements as shown on the approved conceptual grading and drainage plan dated June 03, 2014. Printed-1121/2015 www.C4olRC.u9 Papa 9 of 9 itam ir_Cini RESOLUTION NO. 19-59 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TIME EXTENSION DRC2019-00428, A REQUEST TO ALLOW FOR A ONE (1) YEAR TIME EXTENSION OF A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP (SUBTT17444) RELATED TO A 13-UNIT CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT ON 2.17 ACRES OF LAND IN THE LOW MEDIUM (LM) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (4 TO 8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND 150 FEET NORTH OF MONTE VISTA STREET; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0202-131-27, -61 AND -62. A. Recitals. 1. Golden Avenue Development, Inc. filed an application for a time extension to extend the approval period of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map Time Extension request is referred to as "the application." 2. On October 10, 2007, this Commission adopted Resolution No. 07-59, thereby approving the application subject to specific conditions and time limits. 3. The State extended the approval period for SUBTT17444 one (1)-year to October 10, 2011, per SB 1185. 4. The State extended the approval period for SUBTT17444 two (2)-years to October 10, 2013, per AB 333. 5. The State extended the approval period for SUBTT17444 two (2)-years to October 10, 2015, per AB 208. 6. The State extended the approval period for SUBTT17444 two (2) years to October 10, 2017. allowed extension per AB 116. 7. On November 8, 2017, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga approved a one (1) year time extension for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444, extending the approval period to October 10, 2018. 8. On November 28, 2018, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga approved a one (1) year time extension for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444, extending the approval period to October 10, 2019. 9. On October 23, 2019, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing for the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 1. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 19-59 TIME EXTENSION DRC2019-00428 (TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT17444) GOLDEN AVENUE DEVELOPMENT, INC. October 23, 2019 Page 2 Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on October 9, 2019, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a 2.17-acre parcel of land located on the west side of Archibald Avenue and 150 feet north of Monte Vista Street; and b. The property is within the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (4 to 8 dwelling units per acre). To the north and west is a mobile home park (Chaparral Heights) in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (4 to 8 dwelling units per acre); to the east is a single-family development in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (4 to 8 dwelling units per acre); and, to the south is single-family development in the Medium (M) Residential District (8 to 14 dwelling units per acre); and C. The subdivision of the project site conforms to all applicable development standards of the Development Code for the Low Medium (LM) Residential District; and d. This application is a request to extend the approval period of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444 for one (1) additional year. The time extension is necessary to allow time for the applicant to complete the final map process. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The previously approved Tentative Tract Map is consistent with the City's current General Plan, Municipal Code, ordinances, plans, codes, and policies. The proposed project is for the subdivision of 2.17 acres of land for condominium purposes for the construction of a 13- unit multi-family development. The project site is within the Low Medium (LM) Residential District which permits the development of multi-family projects with a density of 4 to 8 dwelling units per acre. The approved 13-unit multi-family development on the project site has a density of approximately 6 dwelling units per acres; and b. The site remains physically suitable for the type and density of the proposed subdivision. The project site is surrounded by residential development of similar or greater intensity and is well-suited for the proposed development. The project site has access to a public street and all public utilities are located adjacent to the project site; and C. The proposed subdivision, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. An initial study was prepared for the original project that was approved by the Planning Commission on October 10, 2007, along with a Mitigated Negative Declaration, which reviewed potential environmental impacts created by the construction and operation of 13-unit multi-family development on the project site. Mitigation measures were PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 19-59 TIME EXTENSION DRC2019-00428 (TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT17444) GOLDEN AVENUE DEVELOPMENT, INC. October 23, 2019 Page 3 included in the original approval reducing any potential impacts to less than significant; and d. The proposed subdivision complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. The proposed subdivision complies with all development standards outlined in the Development Code for multi-family projects within the Low Medium (LM) Residential District including density, setbacks, and design; and e. The time extension is within the time limits established by State law and local ordinance. State law allows for one (1) year time extensions. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the application, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in connection with the review and approval of this application based upon the following findings and determinations: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration on October 10, 2007, in connection with the City's approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project unless: (i) substantial changes are proposed to the project that would indicate new or more severe impacts on the environment; (ii) substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the project was previously reviewed that would indicate new or more severe environmental impacts; or (iii) new important information shows the project will have new or more severe impacts than previously considered; or (iv) additional mitigation measures are now feasible to reduce impacts or different mitigation measures can be imposed to substantially reduce impacts. b. The Planning Commission finds, in connection with Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444, that substantial changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project have not occurred which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. A Biological Resources Survey Report (Vincent N. Scheidt; July 2019)was submitted as part of the time extension request. The report concludes that no native habitat types occur onsite, and no federally listed species were observed or are expected to occur on the project site due to lack of suitable native habitats, level of disturbance that has occurred to the site, and development of surrounding lands. No direct or indirect impact to federally listed species is anticipated from the project or the related Tentative Map Time Extension. The report does find that the flood control channel that traverses the project site before entering a City's storm drain system likely qualifies as waters of the United States. The Biological Habitat Assessment Report (Eilar Associates; July 12, 2005) submitted as part of the original environmental determination also concluded that the onsite drainage channel may be classified as jurisdictional waters that would necessitate permits from Federal, State and regional agencies. The original environmental determination did not include a mitigation measure requiring consultation with the regulating agencies to determine whether the onsite drainage facility qualifies as jurisdictional waters. To rectify this oversite, a condition of approval has been added to Time Extension DRC2019-00428 requiring consultation with the regulating agencies to determine whether permits are required prior to the approval of any earth-moving activities. This new condition of approval is not the result of new environmental impacts or new information, PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 19-59 TIME EXTENSION DRC2019-00428 (TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT17444) GOLDEN AVENUE DEVELOPMENT, INC. October 23, 2019 Page 4 rather it is to address an impact that was known when the original environmental determination was made. The application is for a one (1) year time extension of a previously approved tentative tract map and a two (2) year time extension of a previously approved design review and related files with no proposed changes to the scope of the original approval. With the inclusion of the condition of approval requiring consultation with the regulating agencies related to the onsite drainage channel, staff finds that the project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration, not have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less than significant. Therefore, pursuant to CEQA, staff recommends that the Planning Commission concur with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is required in connection with the City's consideration of Time Extension DRC2019-00428. C. Based on these findings and all evidence in the record, the Planning Commission concurs with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is required pursuant to CEQA in connection with the City's consideration of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3 and 4 above, this Commission hereby grants a time extension. The new expiration date for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444 is October 10, 2020. 6. All applicable Conditions of Approval in Resolution No. 07-59 and incorporated Standard Conditions in Resolution 07-59 for SUBTT17444 shall apply to Time Extension DRC2019-00428, with the addition of the following Condition of Approval related to the onsite drainage facility which may constitute jurisdictional waters: Prior to approval of any earth-moving activities, the applicant shall consult with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW), the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) to determine whether the onsite drainage facility constitutes jurisdictional waters. Any impact to CDFW, USACE and RWQCB jurisdictional waters may require a 1600 Streambed Alteration Agreement from the CDFW, a Section 404 permit authorization from the USACE, and a 401 State Water Quality Certification from the RWQCB. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF October 2019. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Tony Guglielmo, Chairman PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 19-59 TIME EXTENSION DRC2019-00428 (TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT17444) GOLDEN AVENUE DEVELOPMENT, INC. October 23, 2019 Page 5 ATTEST: Anne McIntosh, Secretary I, Anne McIntosh, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 23rd day of October 2019, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: RESOLUTION NO. 19-60 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TIME EXTENSION DRC2019-00428, A REQUEST TO ALLOW FOR A TWO (2) YEAR TIME EXTENSION OF A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED DESIGN REVIEW (DRC2013-00583) RELATED TO A 13-UNIT CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT ON 2.17 ACRES OF LAND IN THE LOW MEDIUM (LM) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (4 TO 8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND 150 FEET NORTH OF MONTE VISTA STREET; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0202-131-27, -61 AND -62. A. Recitals. 1. Golden Avenue Development, Inc. filed an application for a time extension to extend the approval period of Design Review DRC2013-00583, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Design Review Time Extension request is referred to as "the application." 2. On February 11, 2015, this Commission adopted Resolution No. 15-14, thereby approving the application subject to specific conditions and time limits. 3. On October 23, 2019, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing for the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 1. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on October 9, 2019, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a 2.17-acre parcel of land located on the west side of Archibald Avenue and 150 feet north of Monte Vista Street; and b. The property is within the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (4 to 8 dwelling units per acre). To the north and west is a mobile home park (Chaparral Heights) in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (4 to 8 dwelling units per acre); to the east is a single-family development in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (4 to 8 dwelling units per acre); and, to the south is single-family development in the Medium (M) Residential District (8 to 14 dwelling units per acre); and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 19-60 TIME EXTENSION DRC2019-00428 (DESIGN REVIEW DRC2013-00583) GOLDEN AVENUE DEVELOPMENT, INC. October 23, 2019 Page 2 C. Design Review DRC2013-00583 was approved on February 11, 2015, for the design of the 13 detached units related to Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444 and included a related Minor Exception DRC2013-00941, to permit a wall above the height limit along Archibald Avenue for noise attenuation purposes, Minor Exception DRC2014-00358, to permit walls above the height limit due to onsite grades between lots, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00942, for the removal of up to 39 onsite trees; and d. Time Extension DRC2019-00428 includes a request to extend the approval period of Design Review DRC2013-00583 for two (2) additional years. The time extension is necessary to allow time for the applicant to complete the final map process. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The previously approved Design Review is consistent with the General Plan in that the project site is residentially zoned and is being subdivided for residential purposes. The approved 13 detached condominium unit has a density of 6 dwelling units per acre, within the permitted density range of 4 to 8 units per acre for the Low Medium (LM) zoning designation; and b. The use continues to be in accord with the objective of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. The project site is located in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District, which is designated for the development of single-family and multi-family residential units with a density range of 8 to 14 dwelling units per acre. The approved project is for the development of a multi-family development of approximately 6 dwelling units per acre; and C. The proposed use continues to be compliance with each of the applicable provisions of this Development Code; The approved design is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code including project density, setbacks, parking, private and common open space areas and recreation facilities. The project, though, includes Minor Exception DRC2013-00941, to permit a wall above the height limit along Archibald Avenue for noise attenuation purposes and Minor Exception DRC2014-00358, to permit walls above the height limit due to onsite grades between lots; and d. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will continue to not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. An initial study was prepared for the original project that was approved by the Planning Commission on October 10, 2007, along with a Mitigated Negative Declaration, which reviewed potential environmental impacts created by the construction and operation of 13-unit multi-family development on the project site. Mitigation measures were included in the original approval reducing any potential impacts to less than significant. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the application, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in connection with the review and approval of this application based upon the following findings and determinations: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 19-60 TIME EXTENSION DRC2019-00428 (DESIGN REVIEW DRC2013-00583) GOLDEN AVENUE DEVELOPMENT, INC. October 23, 2019 Page 3 local CEQA Guidelines, the City adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration on October 10, 2007, in connection with the City's approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project unless: (i) substantial changes are proposed to the project that would indicate new or more severe impacts on the environment; (ii) substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the project was previously reviewed that indicate new or more severe environmental impacts; or (iii) new important information shows the project will have new or more severe impacts than previously considered; or (iv) additional mitigation measures are now feasible to reduce impacts or different mitigation measures can be imposed to substantially reduce impacts. b. The Planning Commission finds, in connection with Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444, that substantial changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project have not occurred which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. A Biological Resources Survey Report (Vincent N. Scheidt; July 2019) was submitted as part of the time extension request. The report concludes that no native habitat types occur onsite, and no federally listed species were observed or are expected to occur on the project site due to lack of suitable native habitats, level of disturbance that has occurred to the site, and development of surrounding lands. No direct or indirect impact to federally listed species is anticipated from the project or the related Tentative Map Time Extension. The report does find that the flood control channel that traverses the project site before entering a City's storm drain system likely qualifies as waters of the United States. The Biological Habitat Assessment Report (Eilar Associates; July 12, 2005) submitted as part of the original environmental determination also concluded that the onsite drainage channel may be classified as jurisdictional waters that would necessitate permits from Federal, State and regional agencies. The original environmental determination did not include a mitigation measure requiring consultation with the regulating agencies to determine whether the onsite drainage facility qualifies as jurisdictional waters. To rectify this oversite, a condition of approval has been added to Time Extension DRC2019-00428 requiring consultation with the regulating agencies to determine whether permits are required prior to the approval of any earth-moving activities. This new condition of approval is not the result of new environmental impacts or new information, rather it is to address an impact that was known when the original environmental determination was made. The application is for a one (1) year time extension of a previously approved tentative tract map and a two (2) year time extension of a previously approved design review and related files with no proposed changes to the scope of the original approval. With the inclusion of the condition of approval requiring consultation with the regulating agencies related to the onsite drainage channel, staff finds that the project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration, not have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less than significant. Therefore, pursuant to CEQA, staff recommends that the Planning Commission concur with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is required in connection with the City's consideration of Time Extension DRC2019-00428. C. Based on these findings and all evidence in the record,the Planning Commission concurs with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is required pursuant PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 19-60 TIME EXTENSION DRC2019-00428 (DESIGN REVIEW DRC2013-00583) GOLDEN AVENUE DEVELOPMENT, INC. October 23, 2019 Page 4 to CEQA in connection with the City's consideration of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3 and 4 above, this Commission hereby grants a time extension. The new expiration date for Design Review DRC2013-00583 is February 11, 2022. 6. All applicable Conditions of Approval in Resolution No. 15-14 and incorporated Standard Conditions in Resolution 15-14 for Design Review DRC2013-00583 shall apply to Time Extension DRC2019-00428, with the addition of the following Condition of Approval related to the onsite drainage facility which may constitute jurisdictional waters: Prior to approval of any earth-moving activities, the applicant shall consult with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW), the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) to determine whether the onsite drainage facility constitutes jurisdictional waters. Any impact to CDFW, USACE and RWQCB jurisdictional waters may require a 1600 Streambed Alteration Agreement from the CDFW, a Section 404 permit authorization from the USACE, and a 401 State Water Quality Certification from the RWQCB. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF October 2019. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Tony Guglielmo, Chairman ATTEST: Anne McIntosh, Secretary I, Anne McIntosh, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 23rd day of October 2019, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: RESOLUTION NO. 19-61 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,APPROVING TIME EXTENSION DRC2019-00428, A REQUEST TO ALLOW FOR A TWO (2) YEAR TIME EXTENSION OF A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED MINOR EXCEPTION (DRC2013-00941) RELATED TO A 13-UNIT CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT ON 2.17 ACRES OF LAND IN THE LOW MEDIUM (LM) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (4 TO 8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND 150 FEET NORTH OF MONTE VISTA STREET; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0202-131-27, -61 AND -62. A. Recitals. 1. Golden Avenue Development, Inc. filed an application for a time extension to extend the approval period of Minor Exception DRC2013-00941, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Minor Exception Time Extension request is referred to as "the application." 2. On February 11, 2015, this Commission adopted Resolution No. 15-15, thereby approving the application subject to specific conditions and time limits. 3. On October 23, 2019, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing for the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 1. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on October 23, 2019, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a 2.17-acre parcel of land located on the west side of Archibald Avenue and 150 feet north of Monte Vista Street; and b. The property is within the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (4 to 8 dwelling units per acre). To the north and west is a mobile home park (Chaparral Heights) in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (4 to 8 dwelling units per acre); to the east is a single-family development in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (4 to 8 dwelling units per acre); and, to the south is single-family development in the Medium (M) Residential District (8 to 14 dwelling units per acre); and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 19-61 TIME EXTENSION DRC2019-00428 (MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2013-00941) GOLDEN AVENUE DEVELOPMENT, INC. October 23, 2019 Page 2 C. Design Review DRC2013-00583 was approved on February 11, 2015, for the design of the 13 detached units related to Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444 and included a related Minor Exception DRC2013-00941, to permit a wall above the height limit along Archibald Avenue for noise attenuation purposes, Minor Exception DRC2014-00358, to permit walls above the height limit due to onsite grades between lots, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00942, for the removal of up to 39 onsite trees; and d. Time Extension DRC2019-00428 includes a request to extend the approval period of Minor Exception DRC2013-00941 for two (2)additional years. The time extension is necessary to allow time for the applicant to complete the final map process. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The Minor Exception remains consistent with the General Plan or any applicable specific plan or Development Agreement. The proposed increase in wall height along the eastern project boundary is necessary to comply with the General Plan Goal PS-13 to minimize the impacts of excessive noise levels and General Plan Policy PS-13-3 to consider the use of noise barriers or walls to reduce noise levels generated by ground transportation. The increased wall height will reduce the onsite noise levels to be in compliance with City regulations. b. The proposed development remains compatible with existing and proposed land uses in the surrounding area. The proposed project is compatible with the surrounding land uses in that the project site is within the Low Medium (LM) Residential District, which permits the development of single and multi-family residences.Additionally, there is a residential development to the north, south, and west of the project site and to the east across Archibald Avenue. Noise attenuation walls over the permitted height limit occur throughout the City along major streets. C. The proposed exception to the specific development standard(s) remains necessary to allow creative design solutions compatible with the desires of the community and/or to accommodate unique site conditions. The project is located along a major street which increases the onsite noise levels in excess of City regulations. The increased wall height will permit the project to comply with City noise attenuation requirements and provide a pleasing street scene. The proposed wall will be constructed of decorative block and the area between the wall and the public right-of-way will be landscaped to soften the appearance of the wall. d. The granting of the Minor Exception will continue to not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district, and will not be detrimental to public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious properties or improvements in the vicinity. It is common practice to approve Minor Exceptions for wall height in order to mitigate excessive noise levels for projects adjacent to major streets. The increased wall height will not negatively impact properties in the vicinity as the walls will be required to have a decorative finish and landscaping will soften the appearance of the extra wall height. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the application, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in connection with the PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 19-61 TIME EXTENSION DRC2019-00428 (MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2013-00941) GOLDEN AVENUE DEVELOPMENT, INC. October 23, 2019 Page 3 review and approval of this application based upon the following findings and determinations: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration on October 10, 2007, in connection with the City's approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project unless: (i) substantial changes are proposed to the project that would indicate new or more severe impacts on the environment; (ii) substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the project was previously reviewed that indicate new or more severe environmental impacts; or (iii) new important information shows the project will have new or more severe impacts than previously considered; or (iv) additional mitigation measures are now feasible to reduce impacts or different mitigation measures can be imposed to substantially reduce impacts. b. The Planning Commission finds, in connection with Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444, that substantial changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project have not occurred which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. A Biological Resources Survey Report (Vincent N. Scheidt; July 2019)was submitted as part of the time extension request. The report concludes that no native habitat types occur onsite, and no federally listed species were observed or are expected to occur on the project site due to lack of suitable native habitats, level of disturbance that has occurred to the site, and development of surrounding lands. No direct or indirect impact to federally listed species is anticipated from the project or the related Tentative Map Time Extension. The report does find that the flood control channel that traverses the project site before entering a City's storm drain system likely qualifies as waters of the United States. The Biological Habitat Assessment Report (Eilar Associates; July 12, 2005) submitted as part of the original environmental determination also concluded that the onsite drainage channel may be classified as jurisdictional waters that would necessitate permits from Federal, State and regional agencies. The original environmental determination did not include a mitigation measure requiring consultation with the regulating agencies to determine whether the onsite drainage facility qualifies as jurisdictional waters. To rectify this oversite, a condition of approval has been added to Time Extension DRC2019-00428 requiring consultation with the regulating agencies to determine whether permits are required prior to the approval of any earth-moving activities. This new condition of approval is not the result of new environmental impacts or new information, rather it is to address an impact that was known when the original environmental determination was made. The application is for a one (1) year time extension of a previously approved tentative tract map and a two (2) year time extension of a previously approved design review and related files with no proposed changes to the scope of the original approval. With the inclusion of the condition of approval requiring consultation with the regulating agencies related to the onsite drainage channel, staff finds that the project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration, not have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less than significant. Therefore, pursuant to CEQA, staff recommends that the Planning Commission concur with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is required in connection with the City's consideration of Time Extension DRC2019-00428. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 19-61 TIME EXTENSION DRC2019-00428 (MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2013-00941) GOLDEN AVENUE DEVELOPMENT, INC. October 23, 2019 Page 4 C. Based on these findings and all evidence in the record, the Planning Commission concurs with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is required pursuant to CEQA in connection with the City's consideration of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3 and 4 above, this Commission hereby grants a time extension. The new expiration date for Minor Exception DRC2013-00941 is February 11, 2022. 6. All applicable Conditions of Approval in Resolution No. 15-15 and incorporated Standard Conditions in Resolution 15-15 for Minor Exception DRC2013-00941 shall apply to Time Extension DRC2019-00428, with the addition of the following Condition of Approval related to the onsite drainage facility which may constitute jurisdictional waters: Prior to approval of any earth-moving activities, the applicant shall consult with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW), the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) to determine whether the onsite drainage facility constitutes jurisdictional waters. Any impact to CDFW, USACE and RWQCB jurisdictional waters may require a 1600 Streambed Alteration Agreement from the CDFW, a Section 404 permit authorization from the USACE, and a 401 State Water Quality Certification from the RWQCB. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF October 2019. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Tony Guglielmo, Chairman ATTEST: Anne McIntosh, Secretary I, Anne McIntosh, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 23rd day of October 2019, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: RESOLUTION NO. 19-62 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,APPROVING TIME EXTENSION DRC2019-00428, A REQUEST TO ALLOW FOR A TWO (2) YEAR TIME EXTENSION OF A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED MINOR EXCEPTION (DRC2014-00358) RELATED TO A 13-UNIT CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT ON 2.17 ACRES OF LAND IN THE LOW MEDIUM (LM) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (4 TO 8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND 150 FEET NORTH OF MONTE VISTA STREET; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0202-131-27, -61 AND -62. A. Recitals. 1. Golden Avenue Development, Inc. filed an application for a time extension to extend the approval period of Minor Exception DRC2014-00358, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Minor Exception Time Extension request is referred to as "the application." 2. On February 11, 2015, this Commission adopted Resolution No. 15-16, thereby approving the application subject to specific conditions and time limits. 3. On October 23, 2019, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing for the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 1. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on October 23, 2019, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a 2.17-acre parcel of land located on the west side of Archibald Avenue and 150 feet north of Monte Vista Street; and b. The property is within the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (4 to 8 dwelling units per acre). To the north and west is a mobile home park (Chaparral Heights) in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (4 to 8 dwelling units per acre); to the east is a single-family development in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (4 to 8 dwelling units per acre); and, to the south is single-family development in the Medium (M) Residential District (8 to 14 dwelling units per acre); and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 19-62 TIME EXTENSION DRC2019-00428 (MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2014-00358) GOLDEN AVENUE DEVELOPMENT, INC. October 23, 2019 Page 2 C. Design Review DRC2013-00583 was approved on February 11, 2015, for the design of the 13 detached units related to Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444 and included a related Minor Exception DRC2013-00941, to permit a wall above the height limit along Archibald Avenue for noise attenuation purposes, Minor Exception DRC2014-00358, to permit walls above the height limit due to onsite grades between lots, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00942, for the removal of up to 39 onsite trees; and d. Time Extension DRC2019-00428 includes a request to extend the approval period of Minor Exception DRC2014-00358 for two (2)additional years. The time extension is necessary to allow time for the applicant to complete the final map process. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The Minor Exception remains consistent with the General Plan or any applicable specific plan or Development Agreement. The proposed increase in wall height is necessary due to a grade difference between adjacent private yard areas and is consistent with the residential nature of the Development District in which the site is located. The additional wall height will provide privacy and security between the adjacent yard areas and neighboring project sites. b. The proposed development remains compatible with existing and proposed land uses in the surrounding area as the project site is within the Low Medium (LM) Residential District, which permits the development of single and multi-family residences. Additionally, there is residential development to the north, south, and west of the project site and to the east across Archibald Avenue. Increased wall heights are common where there is a grade difference between adjacent yard areas and neighboring project sites. C. The proposed exception to the specific development standard(s) remains necessary to allow creative design solutions compatible with the desires of the community and/or to accommodate unique site conditions. There is an approximately 2-foot grade difference between adjacent private yards areas. The additional wall height will allow residents to secure their private yard areas with a minimum 6-foot high wall. d. The granting of the Minor Exception will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district, and will not be detrimental to public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious properties or improvements in the vicinity. It is common practice to approve Minor Exceptions for wall height within the residential districts when there is a grade difference between adjacent yard areas. The additional wall height will only be visible to the residents living directly adjacent to the walls and will not negatively impact other homeowners in the area. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the application, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in connection with the review and approval of this application based upon the following findings and determinations: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 19-62 TIME EXTENSION DRC2019-00428 (MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2014-00358) GOLDEN AVENUE DEVELOPMENT, INC. October 23, 2019 Page 3 local CEQA Guidelines, the City adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration on October 10, 2007, in connection with the City's approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project unless: (i) substantial changes are proposed to the project that would indicate new or more severe impacts on the environment; (ii) substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the project was previously reviewed that indicate new or more severe environmental impacts; or (iii) new important information shows the project will have new or more severe impacts than previously considered; or (iv) additional mitigation measures are now feasible to reduce impacts or different mitigation measures can be imposed to substantially reduce impacts. b. The Planning Commission finds, in connection with Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444, that substantial changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project have not occurred which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. A Biological Resources Survey Report (Vincent N. Scheidt; July 2019) was submitted as part of the time extension request. The report concludes that no native habitat types occur onsite, and no federally listed species were observed or are expected to occur on the project site due to lack of suitable native habitats, level of disturbance that has occurred to the site, and development of surrounding lands. No direct or indirect impact to federally listed species is anticipated from the project or the related Tentative Map Time Extension. The report does find that the flood control channel that traverses the project site before entering a City's storm drain system likely qualifies as waters of the United States. The Biological Habitat Assessment Report (Eilar Associates; July 12, 2005) submitted as part of the original environmental determination also concluded that the onsite drainage channel may be classified as jurisdictional waters that would necessitate permits from Federal, State and regional agencies. The original environmental determination did not include a mitigation measure requiring consultation with the regulating agencies to determine whether the onsite drainage facility qualifies as jurisdictional waters. To rectify this oversite, a condition of approval has been added to Time Extension DRC2019-00428 requiring consultation with the regulating agencies to determine whether permits are required prior to the approval of any earth-moving activities. This new condition of approval is not the result of new environmental impacts or new information, rather it is to address an impact that was known when the original environmental determination was made. The application is for a one (1) year time extension of a previously approved tentative tract map and a two (2) year time extension of a previously approved design review and related files with no proposed changes to the scope of the original approval. With the inclusion of the condition of approval requiring consultation with the regulating agencies related to the onsite drainage channel, staff finds that the project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration, not have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less than significant. Therefore, pursuant to CEQA, staff recommends that the Planning Commission concur with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is required in connection with the City's consideration of Time Extension DRC2019-00428. C. Based on these findings and all evidence in the record,the Planning Commission concurs with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is required pursuant PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 19-62 TIME EXTENSION DRC2019-00428 (MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2014-00358) GOLDEN AVENUE DEVELOPMENT, INC. October 23, 2019 Page 4 to CEQA in connection with the City's consideration of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3 and 4 above, this Commission hereby grants a time extension. The new expiration date for Minor Exception DRC2013-00941 is February 11, 2022. 6. All applicable Conditions of Approval in Resolution No. 15-16 and incorporated Standard Conditions in Resolution 15-16 for Minor Exception DRC2014-00358 shall apply to Time Extension DRC2019-00428, with the addition of the following Condition of Approval related to the onsite drainage facility which may constitute jurisdictional waters: Prior to approval of any earth-moving activities, the applicant shall consult with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW), the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) to determine whether the onsite drainage facility constitutes jurisdictional waters. Any impact to CDFW, USACE and RWQCB jurisdictional waters may require a 1600 Streambed Alteration Agreement from the CDFW, a Section 404 permit authorization from the USACE, and a 401 State Water Quality Certification from the RWQCB. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF October 2019. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Tony Guglielmo, Chairman ATTEST: Anne McIntosh, Secretary I, Anne McIntosh, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 23rd day of October 2019, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: RESOLUTION NO. 19-63 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,APPROVING TIME EXTENSION DRC2019-00428, A REQUEST TO ALLOW FOR A TWO (2) YEAR TIME EXTENSION OF A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED TREE REMOVAL PERMIT (DRC2013-00942) RELATED TO A 13-UNIT CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT ON 2.17 ACRES OF LAND IN THE LOW MEDIUM (LM) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (4 TO 8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND 150 FEET NORTH OF MONTE VISTA STREET; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0202-131-27, -61 AND -62. A. Recitals. 1. Golden Avenue Development, Inc. filed an application for a time extension to extend the approval period of Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00942, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tree Removal Permit Time Extension request is referred to as "the application." 2. On February 11, 2015, this Commission adopted Resolution No. 15-17, thereby approving the application subject to specific conditions and time limits. 3. On October 23, 2019, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing for the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 1. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on October 23, 2019, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a 2.17-acre parcel of land located on the west side of Archibald Avenue and 150 feet north of Monte Vista Street; and b. The property is within the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (4 to 8 dwelling units per acre). To the north and west is a mobile home park (Chaparral Heights) in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (4 to 8 dwelling units per acre); to the east is a single-family development in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (4 to 8 dwelling units per acre); and, to the south is single-family development in the Medium (M) Residential District (8 to 14 dwelling units per acre); and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 19-63 TIME EXTENSION DRC2019-00428 (TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2013-00942) GOLDEN AVENUE DEVELOPMENT, INC. October 23, 2019 Page 2 C. Design Review DRC2013-00583 was approved on February 11, 2015, for the design of the 13 detached units related to Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444 and included a related Minor Exception DRC2013-00941, to permit a wall above the height limit along Archibald Avenue for noise attenuation purposes, Minor Exception DRC2014-00358, to permit walls above the height limit due to onsite grades between lots, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00942, for the removal of up to 39 onsite trees; and d. Time Extension DRC2019-00428 includes a request to extend the approval period of Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00942 for two (2) additional years. The time extension is necessary to allow time for the applicant to complete the final map process. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The removal of the trees remains necessary due to the condition of the trees related to disease, danger of collapse, proximity to an existing structure, or interference with utility services. The Arborist Report prepared for the project on May 17, 2005, concluded that all but 6 of the trees are in poor condition and should be removed. The required grading and site layout prevent preserving the 6 healthy trees. b. The removal of the trees remains necessary in order to construct improvements which will allow economic enjoyment of the property. The trees conflict with the construction of onsite improvements related to the development of the proposed 13-unit multi-family development. C. The removal of the trees continues to not negatively impact the neighborhood, the established character of the area and property values. There are a large number of mature trees in the surrounding area. The removal of the onsite trees will have a minimal impact on the surrounding area as the 45 trees slated for removal will be mitigated by the number of trees that will be planted as part of the project. The Development Code requires that new developments plant 40 trees per acre, of which 90-percent must be 15-gallon size trees and 10-percent must be 24-inch box size trees. The Landscape Plan for the project includes 92 new trees, 5 trees in excess of the minimum requirement, of which 43 percent will be 24-inch box size trees. d. The removal of the trees remains necessary to construct required improvements within the public street right-of-way or within a flood control or utility right-of-way. There are four trees to be removed within the public right-of-way that will replaced by new street trees. e. The trees cannot be preserved through pruning and proper maintenance or relocation. All but 6 of the trees slated for removal have been determined by the Arborist Report to be in poor condition. The 6 healthy trees conflict with the proposed onsite improvements. f. The trees do not constitute a significant natural resource in the city. All but 6 of the trees are in poor condition. The trees will be replaced as part of the project with a greater number of trees. g. Removal of the trees is not restricted by a Specific Plan, Community Plan, condition of approval, or designation as a Historic Landmark. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 19-63 TIME EXTENSION DRC2019-00428 (TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2013-00942) GOLDEN AVENUE DEVELOPMENT, INC. October 23, 2019 Page 3 h. Every effort has been made to incorporate the trees into the design of the project and the only appropriate alternative is the removal of the trees. The condition of the trees and the proposed site and grading plans prevent maintaining the trees in their present location or from relocating the trees on site. i. The removal of the trees will not have a negative impact on the health, safety, or viability of surrounding trees, nor will it negatively impact the aesthetics or general welfare of the surrounding area. Only 6 of the 45 trees slated for removal have been determined to be healthy. Any negative impact created by the removal of the 6 healthy trees will be mitigated by the 92 new trees that will be planted as part of the project. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the application, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in connection with the review and approval of this application based upon the following findings and determinations: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration on October 10, 2007, in connection with the City's approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project unless: (i) substantial changes are proposed to the project that would indicate new or more severe impacts on the environment; (ii) substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the project was previously reviewed that indicate new or more severe environmental impacts; or (iii) new important information shows the project will have new or more severe impacts than previously considered; or (iv) additional mitigation measures are now feasible to reduce impacts or different mitigation measures can be imposed to substantially reduce impacts. b. The Planning Commission finds, in connection with Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444, that substantial changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project have not occurred which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. A Biological Resources Survey Report (Vincent N. Scheidt; July 2019)was submitted as part of the time extension request. The report concludes that no native habitat types occur onsite, and no federally listed species were observed or are expected to occur on the project site due to lack of suitable native habitats, level of disturbance that has occurred to the site, and development of surrounding lands. No direct or indirect impact to federally listed species is anticipated from the project or the related Tentative Map Time Extension. The report does find that the flood control channel that traverses the project site before entering a City's storm drain system likely qualifies as jurisdictional waters. The Biological Habitat Assessment Report (Eilar Associates; July 12, 2005) submitted as part of the original environmental determination also concluded that the onsite drainage channel may be classified as jurisdictional waters that would necessitate permits from Federal, State and regional agencies. The original environmental determination did not include a mitigation measure requiring consultation with the regulating agencies to determine whether the onsite drainage facility qualifies as jurisdictional waters. To rectify this oversite, a condition of approval has been added to Time Extension DRC2019-00428 requiring consultation with the regulating agencies to determine whether permits are required prior to the approval of any earth-moving activities. This PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 19-63 TIME EXTENSION DRC2019-00428 (TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2013-00942) GOLDEN AVENUE DEVELOPMENT, INC. October 23, 2019 Page 4 new condition of approval is not the result of new environmental impacts or new information, rather it is to address an impact that was known when the original environmental determination was made. The application is for a one (1) year time extension of a previously approved tentative tract map and a two (2) year time extension of a previously approved design review and related files with no proposed changes to the scope of the original approval. With the inclusion of the condition of approval requiring consultation with the regulating agencies related to the onsite drainage channel, staff finds that the project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration, not have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less than significant. Therefore, pursuant to CEQA, staff recommends that the Planning Commission concur with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is required in connection with the City's consideration of Time Extension DRC2019-00428. C. Based on these findings and all evidence in the record,the Planning Commission concurs with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is required pursuant to CEQA in connection with the City's consideration of Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00942. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3 and 4 above, this Commission hereby grants a time extension. The new expiration date for Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00942 is February 11, 2022. 6. All applicable Conditions of Approval in Resolution No. 15-17 and incorporated Standard Conditions in Resolution 15-17 for Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00942 shall apply to Time Extension DRC2019-00428, with the addition of the following Condition of Approval related to the onsite drainage facility which may constitute jurisdictional waters: Prior to approval of any earth-moving activities, the applicant shall consult with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW), the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) to determine whether the onsite drainage facility constitutes jurisdictional waters. Any impact to CDFW, USACE and RWQCB jurisdictional waters may require a 1600 Streambed Alteration Agreement from the CDFW, a Section 404 permit authorization from the USACE, and a 401 State Water Quality Certification from the RWQCB. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF October 2019. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Tony Guglielmo, Chairman PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 19-63 TIME EXTENSION DRC2019-00428 (TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2013-00942) GOLDEN AVENUE DEVELOPMENT, INC. October 23, 2019 Page 5 ATTEST: Anne McIntosh, Secretary I, Anne McIntosh, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 23rd day of October 2019, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Sir STAFF REPORT DATE: October 23, 2019 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Anne McIntosh, Planning Director INITIATED BY: Dat Tran, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM20101 — DOUGLAS LAW — A request to subdivide an existing 34,849 square feet (0.80 acre) vacant lot into three lots, located in the Low(L) residential district located at 7745 Vineyard Avenue;APN: 0208-091-44. This item is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)and the City's CEQA guidelines under CEQA Section 15315. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20101 through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with conditions. SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project site is a parcel of approximately 34,849 square feet (0.80 acre) with dimensions of approximately 113 feet in length (north to south) by approximately 282 feet in width (east to west). The project site is located east of Vineyard Avenue and south of Azurite Avenue, with street frontage along Vineyard Avenue. The Vineyard Avenue frontage is currently unimproved. A number of trees are located throughout the site, with the majority located along the south property line. The site slopes north to south. The elevation at the north end is approximately 1319 feet whereas the elevation on the south end is approximately 1305 feet. Land Use General Plan Zoning Single-Family Low Residential (2.0-4.0 Site Residence DwellingUnits Per Acre) Low Residential (L) District Single-Family Low Residential (2.0-4.0 North Residence Dwelling Units Per Acre) Low Residential (L) District Single-Family Low Residential (2.0-4.0 South Residence DwellingUnits Per Acre) Low Residential (L) District Single-Family Low Residential (2.0-4.0 West Residence Dwelling Units Per Acre) Low Residential (L) District East Pacific Electric Trail Low Residential (2.0-4.0 Low Residential (L) District Dwelling Units Per Acre PROJECT BACKGROUND: The site was previously improved with an approximately 900 square foot single-family residence at the rear of the site. The residence was granted a demolition permit in August 2008. The project site has been vacant since the demolition of the residence. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM20101 — DOUGLAS LAW October 23, 2019 Page 2 The scope of SUBTPM20101 is to subdivide the project site and establish lot lines for the future development of residential homes on three separate parcels. The architectural design of the homes on these lots will be submitted at a future date under a Design Review application. ANALYSIS: A. General: SUBTPM20101 is a new tentative parcel map consisting of 3 parcels. Parcel 1 and 2 are rectangular in shape. Parcel 3 is roughly trapezoidal in shape. Parcel 1 is located at the front of the site, along Vineyard Avenue. Access to Parcel 1 is provided via a proposed curb and driveway to be located at the northwest corner of the site. Parcels 2 and 3 are arranged behind Parcel 1. Access to Parcels 2 and 3 are provided via a shared driveway running along the southern boundary of the site and exiting onto Vineyard Avenue at the southwest corner of the site. The driveway is located within the boundary of Parcel 3 and includes a private access easement for the benefit of the owner(s) of Parcel 2. All parcels meet the depth, width and total area requirements of the Development Code. Table A below provides the lot dimensions and total square footage of all proposed parcels: Table A: Proposed Lot Dimensions and Lot Area in Compliance with Low (L) Residential District Development Standards Parcels Depth (ft) Width (ft) Total Area (sq. ft.) Required (Min.) 100 65 8,000 Parcel 1 113 90 10,068 Parcel 2 113 90 10,197 Parcel 3* 113 85* 14,584 *Parcel 3 measures 67 feet along the southern property boundary and 102 feet along the northern property boundary,for an average width of 85 feet. While the final design package for the residences has not been submitted, the applicant has included a preliminary footprint configuration of the residences onsite. The configuration shows that all three residences will comply with all applicable development standards, including lot coverage and setback standards for the Low (L) Residential District. Table B below demonstrate the proposed building locations and demonstrate their compliance with applicable development standards. Table B: Proposed Building Locations in Compliance with Low (L) Residential District Development Standards Development Required Parcel Parcel Parcel Standard Lot Coverage 40% 16% 16% 11% maximum Front Building 37 feet 39 feet 40 feet 42 feet Setback* Rear Building 20 feet 34 feet 43 feet 31 feet Setback** Interior Side Building 5/10 feet 25/54 feet 12/24 feet 20/25 feet Setback PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM20101 — DOUGLAS LAW October 23, 2019 Page 3 Front building setback for Parcel 1 is measured from curb face along Vineyard Avenue,whereas the front building setback for Parcels 2 and 3 are measured from their respective south property line boundaries. Rear building setbacks are measured from the sides opposite to the front setback line for each respective parcel. The project site has been reviewed preliminarily for technical considerations such as drainage, grading, and street design. No minor exceptions or variances are expected to be required for building setbacks or perimeter wall heights to meet these considerations. B. Neighborhood Meeting: A neighborhood meeting was conducted for the project on September 30, 2019 at Alta Loma High School. Property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site were notified of the meeting via mailed notices. No residents attended the meeting. C. Design Review Committee: The scope of SUBTPM20101 is limited to the subdivision of the project site and establishment of lot lines. Given the limited number of lots and typical design of the subdivision, the project was not submitted to Design Review Committee for review. When the development proposal for the homes are submitted, the project will be forwarded to the Design Review Committee for review. D. Public Art: The project is exempt from providing public art as outlined in Chapter 17.124 of the Development Code. The proposed is a tentative parcel map and does not include a proposal for the development of residential units. Additionally, only residential development projects that propose to develop four or more dwelling units are subject to the public art requirement. E. Environmental Assessment: The Planning Department Staff previously determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies under as a Class 15 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15315—Minor Land Divisions. The project scope is for the subdivision of a residentially zoned parcel into three separate parcels. All three parcels are in conformance with the General Plan and Development's zoning designations, and no variances or exceptions are required. All parcels can be adequately served by fire, public safety and utility services, and all parcels have driveway access onto nearby roadways. All parcels are relatively flat and do not have a slope greater than 20 percent. The parcel proposed to be divided was not involved in a division from a larger parcel within the previous 2 years. There is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. FISCAL IMPACT: The project site currently is assessed an annual property tax. A percentage of this annual tax is shared with the City. The proposed development will increase the value of the project site and the City's annual share of the property tax will increase accordingly. The project proponent also will be responsible for paying one-time impact fees. These fees are intended to address the increased demand for City services due to the proposed project. The following types of services that these impact fees would support include the following: library services, transportation infrastructure, drainage infrastructure, animal services, police, parks, and community and recreation services. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: Although a specific current City Council goal does not apply to the application, the proposed is consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan and the objectives of the Development Code. The General Plan land use designation for the project site is Low Residential, and the PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM20101 — DOUGLAS LAW October 23, 2019 Page 4 Development Code zoning designation for the subject property is Low Residential (L) District. The proposed subdivision will create three single-family residential lots consistent with the underlying land use designations and compatible in size and configuration with neighboring residential lots. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. No correspondence has been received in response to these notices. EXHIBITS: Exhibit A - Site Aerial Exhibit B - Site Vicinity Map Exhibit C - Site Plan Exhibit D - Conceptual Grading Plan and Site Sections Draft Resolution 19-65 Recommending Approval of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM2010 y]y F.�y T 1 � �� --r.t � 3�; � '� ,ter y 1 �I �• c. .o� ��� � la- Ag IP { Goggle }' - ` ' ■■■ SITE UTILIZATION MAP ------ ' ..........------ ----- ----- uj W-------- E ENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO . 20101 --- -- --------- -- s ------F- ---- 7745 VINEYARD AVE . cl 3 13 --------------- X GRAPHIC SCALE ------------------------- ---------------- 0 40 80 160 ��ZONE IN FEET 1 INCH = 80 FT. L-------------- ------------- ------------- VACANT uj ----Li---- ENCOMPASS ASSOCIATES, INC. L CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS LW- T-------T-------- ------T-------T---- 5699 COUSINS PLACE ----------- ------------- -------------- LIEL--------- RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA 91737 L --------- -----Ll -Z (909)684-0093 Y ------------- ------------- ------------- VICINITY MAP -------7Z 1"=500' L----------------L--------L- ----- ------ ------L -—-—-—-—-—-—-—- —-—-—- -— —-—-—-—- -—-—-—-— -—-—-—-—- OWNER: DOUGLAS LAW -------- 2105 FOOTHILL BLVD. SUITE B-1 11 CH URCH ST. LAVERNE, CA 91750 T--------- —--- ----- douglas.b.law@gmail.com ZONIEl 1 11 909.227.7989 LLJ E IN CIVIL ENGINEER: ENCOMPASS ASSOCIATES, INC. C) 0 E�&nmo- Low DENSE " HF-molEm UJ --------- 5699 COUSINS PLACE Lr) \\ RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91737 ------- Y AARON SKEERS ------------------ ------- —J W ------ 909.684.0093 A 0) E 00 z wo < 0) 0) ------- LAND SURVEYOR ON POINT LAND SURVEYING INC. 1910 ORANGE TREE LANE, SUITE 344 < > 1� REDALNDS, CA 92374< >- \\// 1 909.792.2221 —j co Ld ------------------------ OFFICE@ONPOINTLANDSURVEYING.COM ------------------- ujil uj X/ z Ca CV z 0) --- --------- ------- ---------------- Z) LLJ U) c:) 01 AZURITE AVE. X/ 0I.— > co pi ------------ -------------------------d 0 < cy) 0 ul -T --------- ----- -- LL Lo < C) ---------------- z --------- -------------- LEGEND \< C/) ------------------ LL LOW DENSITY RES. (2-4 DU/AC) ---------------------------- GENERAL COMMERCIAL C) ---------- x. i GENERAL INDUSTRIAL ------------- -------------- ------ (N ZONE It" OPEN SPACE (PARK) • ------------------- ---- -------- ------------------ A ------ --- -----------------7/ (Qs SHEET INDEX 1 . SITE UTILIZATION MAP 2. EXISTING SITE PLAN 3. SITE PLAN 4. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP Lu 5. CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN > 6. SITE & DRAINAGE PLAN - PRELIMINARY WQMP /< ------ E= �NQ� 6rry msmm-nAL 7 LOW OEM/ --------- ---------- z AN, LLI ------ INN-NIN ---------------- VERSION HISTOR ------------ ------- ------- - --- --------- 0 A ,, SHEET 1 1 ------ ------------f-------------------- T 1 OF 6 SUBTPM20101 BENCHMARK SITE PLAN I BENCHMARK: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BM 10048 FD 2 BRASS DISK IN TOP OF CURB BRIDGE WALL COVER CUCAMONGA CREEK FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL STAMPED " CITY 1 OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BM 10048 1987" AT SOUTHWEST uJ, 111'1 �*- ,rr CORNER OF CARNELIAN STREET AND RED HILL COUNTRY CLUBE— ; Q�� �� �— - TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 20101 1302.317 FT � 1______------- ROAD 75FT W/0 CENTERLINE OF CARNELIAN STREET. NO . ELEVATION � � > sn - r J . GRAPHIC SCALE t 0 10 20 40 IN FEET ) 1 INCH — 20 FT. UJ ENCOMPASS ASSOCIATEINC. 1 / ----- ( _ CO ENGINEERS \ I z Z ' I - CONSULTING CIVIL \ 1 ( f -;--------, RANCHfh� O COUSINS PLACE ' R O CUCAMONGA, A91737 C o TW=17.0 EX. TREE TO TF=11.0 TW=12.0 REMAIN H=6' BOUNDARY PROP. BLOCK WALL TFH 66 VICINITY MAP 35 TALL/18 DIA _ _ _ _ _ _ _ N90°00 00 W 281.96 — / 1"=500' PROP. SIDEWALK 90.00' 90.00' 101.96' UJ PROP. CURB & GUTTER PL WQMP LID BMP PROP. AC PAVEMEN BIORETENTION OWNER: DOUGLAS LAW Q PROP. DRIVEWAY 2105 FOOTHILL BLVD. SUITE B-111 Q W=16' ( ) ROW N LA VERNE, CA 91750 (E) ROW / I douglas.b.law@gmail.com Q 66' I 909.227.7989 � P CIVIL ENGINEER: ENCOMPASS ASSOCIATES, INC. 33' 33' I 5699 COUSINS PLACE LL RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91737 �_ 0 z 20' 13' 26' AARON SKEERS 1 2 3 / I 909.684.0093 w ' 10068 S.F. 10197 S. F. 14584 S. F. / PROP. BLOCK WALL LAND SURVEYOR ON POINT LAND SURVEYING INC. z E 00 PROPOSED ro 0 34' 12' 1910 ORANGE TREE LANE, SUITE 344 z V J Q Q STRE T o _CDREDALNDS, CA 92374 !Q, v�/ \ 909.792.2221 CIL-�I ATION o ,�� ,M OFF CE@ONPOINTLANDSURVEYING.COM v /J ~ �RELOCATE ' J J m L CV co ca (E) PP o 24 / 25 J z _ CV E . WATER Z co ,/ �� co J_ � -0 d7 SER w O co 11' 22'� �2' 11 PL 4' 20' 00 J o EX. SEWER L.L 0 0 0 z `f) CIA NOTES PROP. BLOCK WALL DRIVEWAY 33.29 PL 1. WQMP BMP'S: INFILTRATION BIORETENTION BASIN PROP. DR EX. TREE TO BE W I 57.66' 90.00' 2. EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA= 0 REMOVED BOUNDARY 3. PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA= 13,430 SF (20'TALL/12"DIA 0 W W W W CATCH BASIN 4. PRELIMINARY EARTHWORK QUANTITIES: \ N o CONNECT TO RAW CUT: 440 CY CONNECT TO PROP. WATER N EX. SEWER RAW FILL: 1170 CY r EX. WATER S S S ±1298.51NV ANTICIPATE TO BALANCE ON-SITE Ir- 9409 MAIN PR bp. SEWER 18" RCP O N90°00'00"E 240.90' CONTRACTOR TO PREPARE INDEPENDENT BOUNDARY CONNECT TO EARTHWORK CALCULATION PRIOR TO BIDDING PROP. BLOCK WALL TW=10.5 (E) 120" RCP AND GRADING OPERATIONS. Q TW=17.5 PRIVATE ACCESS AND PUBLIC JUNC. STR. N TF=11.5 UTILITY EASEMENT TF=4.5 (CITY DWG# H=6 1268- )H=6 SEPARATION D O PER CVWD / STD. 306 z TI / LEGEND Q z TB — TRACT BOUNDARY Q PL — PROPERTY LINE R/W — RIGHT OF WAY J CL — CENTERLINE W EP — EDGE OF PAVEMENT TC TOP OF CURB FL — FLOWLINE ui FS — FINISHED SURFACE GB — GRADE BREAK INV — PIPE INVERT ^ FG — FINISH GRADE L.L U) ES — EXISTING SURFACE EG — EXISTING GROUND PAD — PAD ELEVATION FF — FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION GF — GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION HP — HIGH POINT TRW — TOP OF RETAINING WALL TF — TOP OF FOOTING 97.61 — INDICATES PROPOSED ELEVATION z (97.61) — INDICATES EXISTING ELEVATION W EX. EX. PROP. PROPOSED CONTOUR L O T SUMMARY TABLE R/W R/W R/W — _ EXISTING CONTOUR 33' 33' PROPOSED DAYLIGHT LINE SD PROPOSED STORM DRAIN LOT # LOT SIZE LOT DIMENSIONS BUILDING FOOTPRINT LOT COVERAGE % SETBACKS 22' 22' 11' SD EXISTING STORM DRAIN VERSION HISTORY W PROPOSED WATER LINE EXISTING I I W EXISTING WATER LINE 4' F=34; S=26' _ r S PROPOSED SEWER LINE 1 10,068 SF 113.3' x 90' N/A 16.2% S=34 R=25 — — I S EXISTING SEWER LINE PROPERTY LINE RIGHT—OF—WAY 2 10,197 SF 113.3' x 90' N/A 16.1 % F=40' S=12' EXIST. C&G — CENTERLINE S=24 R=43 PROP. IMPROVEMENTS BLOCK WALL PROP. 6" C&G 0.5' INDICATES EXTRA DEPTH FOOTING SHEET .3' X 102'* , PROP. SIDEWALK 3 14,584 SF 113 * N/A 11 .2% F=22 5=20 � SLOPE 0 (*VARIES TO 67 ) S=25 R=31 VINEYARD AVE. TYP. SECTION l'--20' I L : , O S - AVERAGE 8,000 SF AC PAVEMENT 3 OF 6 CONCRETE SUBTPM20101 5v BENCHMARK CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN I BENCHMARK: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BM 10048 N FD 2 BRASS DISK IN TOP OF CURB BRIDGE WALL COVER CUCAMONGA CREEK FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL STAMPED " CITY `� W; ; OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BM 10048 1987" AT SOUTHWEST V CORNER OF CARNELIAN STREET AND RED HILL COUNTRY CLUB — ; C)TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP — - 20101 ELEVATION 1302.317 FT � 1_______L_______� ROAD 75FT W/0 CENTERLINE OF CARNELIAN STREET. NO , S } e� UTILITY PURVEYOR CONTACT INFORMATION 7745 VINEYARD AVE z c ELECTRICITY SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON all, ; ` _ -4 S SI"� �i d �1 \�� 800-655-4555 \ d - NATURAL GAS SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS /I I I I I I X 800 427-2200 l I J WATER& SANITARY SEWER CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT I 1319,5 x I '� i \ �,. I I GRAPHIC SCALE 909-987-2591 I I I I I fi ja. L\ 3 O - CABLE TV TIME WARNER CABLE I 1 I `�- }� X 1319,7 {,r„ �,� �� j I I I �� \ / \ i ` \ DENSE THE S m•�� rr, �,� _ 0 10 20 40 888-892-2253 I c I J D E N I t rr, "�`' K CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS \ ' I I (-� -�,6 3 rn .Y- 3�_ _J Il ( IN FEET ) 866-499-8080 ��, 324,5 � TW=17.0 � �— ��, TELEPHONE VERIZON ��� I 131 "r TF-11.0 - - — — — -2 -- - A/ 1 INCH = 20 FT. 800-VERIZON EX. TREE TO i�I I - -— _ 3�. \� `-- �� r REMAIN BOUN&ARY- 7 z - r '7� H-Ff �\� �, / p �_'_\, ENCOMPASS ASSOCIATES, INC. 35'T`ALL/18" DI co / w �u x .�..�..� � � - �' / - '� w w � < —� PROP. SIDE I ; I� P oP. CURB & � T R o 2 % F o S / O i t CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS q QM�LID BMP _ V '� P OP. AC PAVEME �� o C I o s —I____ I �' 5699 COUSINS PLACE I \ J ��p D• O ( ( �� BI�RENENTION �; �- 1 J RANCHO CUCAMONGA,84-009 CA91737 /PROP. DRIVEWAY �Q9 �9s�n o� F�c� .�` \ I I �96 / j - - - y, 1 \ \ (909)684-0093 W 16 ( ) Row-- r `r �. 1� s <., ° �,; ` �Q' �c --- - I (E) ROW \ �` G' -'/ 5.53% ."� 1 N � � \ 13 2 J o / I �`� � � I LE G E N D Ill 16 , 4 G - I &/ ,\ � VICINITY MAP $00% 4 % °�'t��. 70(q P I / TB - TRACT BOUNDARY 1"=500' 33 cn 33' I ( 2Wy �� I L - LINE R/W - RIGHT OF WAY / \ 2 ' 13' / 26' 1 1 11,5 J �` 1304 %/ / CL - CENTERLINE OWNER: DOUGLAS LAW D I /� /� �� / / 3 %/ -/ / EP - EDGE OF PAVEMENT 2105 FOOTHILL BLVD. SUITE B-111 10068 S.F. X / ±INV. PROF. 0 WA TC TOP OF CURB LA VERNE, CA 91750 M l 10197 S. PROPOSED7 I 34' 12' 14584 S S. F F. FL - FLOWLINE douglas.b.law@gmail.com STIR T 13 / _ 909.227.7989 LANDSCAPING BLOCK WALL DED ATION �' o FF=10.67 1309.2 o / FS - FINISHED SURFACE cq GB GRADE BREAK CIVIL ENGINEER: ENCOMPASS ASSOCIATES INC. W/MULCH (AS APPLICABLE) CL FF= 17.67 ( o PAD=10.00 u _ � n INV PIPE INVERT 5699 COUSINS PLACE w Tl 24' / / 1 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91737 COVER - RELOCATE cv b� / �� / FG - FINISH GRADE - L(� U \ (E) PP PAID=17.00 �- � CD I ���, ���J• f G7 ES - EXISTING SURFACE AARON SKEERS E . WATER ��� F �� c� ) , �// 909.684.0093 . N I W \ SERVICE �����1• F`' ,c�, / EG - EXISTING GROUND J c� o 'y 6 I - o / PAD - PAD ELEVATION LAND SURVEYOR ON POINT LAND SURVEYING INC. �, - I �, 5.54 ��� �30 /o �/ FF—s.42 - 1910 ORANGE TREE LANE, SUITE 344 z I Y 22' 2' 11 P p rc � PAD=7.75 / FF - FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION REDALNDS, CA 92374 Q I� r / ^ GF GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION > U i HP - HIGH POINT 909.792.2221 U Q J I ti E WER OFFICE@ONPOINTLANDSURVEYING.COM ENGINEERED o ��� 1� �6 �. ��. / o TRW - TOP OF RETAINING WALL J -j m W N SOIL MEDIA* Q o k� 13 c ,rG, O f / o / I TF - TOP OF FOOTING J z - N o / _,_ F' 97.61 - INDICATES PROPOSED ELEVATION J 0) "' II I W z F LLJ N 0.599 > I II /�/ (97.61) - INDICATES EXISTING ELEVATION Q - W uj C) z C� r �, OP p �` �� `" �,\ PROPOSED CONTOUR = > Ca 0) EOFABRIC BETWEEN II I - 3 9, �, X. • �c' � ��s _Fs ' I `� / O — 3/4 TO 2 VARIES - 3' MIN. SOIL AND GRAVEL � PROP. DRIVEWAY o •�J _ �`a' P� 0, � � �''\ EXISTING CONTOUR GRAVEL REFER TO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE EX. TREE TO BE - �� 6) BOUNDARY � / PROPOSED DAYLIGHT LINE 00 J O II REMOVED - c� �- O � 3 0% � \ / / SD PROPOSED STORM DRAIN � � PLANS FOR SOIL AND PLANT (20'TALL/12"DIA �' 1N�' / C' • W W W \ CATCH BASIN SD EXISTING STORM DRAIN SPECIFICATIONS I 4 ci F ° < <3p - I s �3p �j CONNECT TO / W PROPOSED WATER LINE Ln \ \7Q Q 8./Sq 190 `� ��� A PROP. WA�ER `� SO p0; / X. SEWER TYPICAL BIORETENTION DETAIL CONNECT TO /^ �o " L \ \ / W EXISTING WATER LINE 0 IEWATER 4.1 S PR P. SE ±1298.51NV $ PROPOSED SEWER LINE NOTES ENGINEERED SOIL MEDIA SPECIFICATION MAIN 18�CP / s EXISTING SEWER LINE N > N9 00'00"E 240.90' �O DO X / 1. WQMP BMP'S: INFILTRATION BIORETENTION BASIN SANDY LOAM „ IN Q G �� �, �, BOUN A `a h/ h 'ONNECT TO PROPERTY LINE COMPOSITION SAND COMPOST �I F F s FG' ' ` D 2E �REES _� ��o '� �� �� / ' E 120" RCP 306,8 __ RIGHT-OF-WAY 2. EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA= 0 SAND SILT CLAY I / 0- TW=17.5 I RIVATE ACCESS AND PUBLIC Y4 PROP. BLOCK WALL TW=10.5 i (JUNC. STR. / / CENTERLINE 3. PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA= 13,430 SF VOLUME 65% I 20% 15% I € TF=11.5 J UTILITY EASEMENT O 7' �� C� TFH=6' // Q/ / (CITY DWG# BLOCK WALL 4. PRELIMINARY EARTHWORK QUANTITIES: WEIGHT 75-80% 10% MAX 3% MAX 9% MAX >' H=6' V" '� I �� ) H-6' RAW CUT: 117 CY 1268-D) 0.5 INDICATES EXTRA DEPTH FOOTING �` # �1 1312,6 ' •�'l �� SEPARATION RAW FILL: 1170 CY • TO BE PRIVATELY MAINTAINED BY HOA I �, \� PER CVWD/ / / / SLOPE ANTICIPATE TO BALANCE ON-SITE z • COMPACTION TO BE NO GREATER THAN 85% AT LANDSCAPED AREAS II m / I I STD. 306 / / / • REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR PLANT SPECIFICATIONS — I f / / / /' CONTRACTOR TO PREPARE INDEPENDENT C) II I °I \ AC PAVEMENT (715 SF) EARTHWORK CALCULATION PRIOR TO BIDDING J AND GRADING OPERATIONS. TB TB TB � CONCRETE T7g800 SF) CV EX. PROPERTY TB EX. PROPERTY TB EX. PROPERTY PIL PL PL CL EX. RET. WALL W/ I EX. RET. WALL W/ VINEYARD AVE. R/O/W O REAR YARD WOOD FENCE TO II REAR YARD WOOD FENCE TO II I REAR YARD I FRONT YARD z REMAIN II I REMAIN II I z EX. CL FENCE 3 I BLOCK WALL 31' -- II 3' I 43' - 3' 25 22' 11' I 26' ^ 10' LOT 3 10, LOT 2 /-EX. LOT 1 4' 10' LOT 1 Q EX. GROUND 2' GROUND 21' FF FF CURB & I PAD FF PAD FF I� 2:1 MAX PAD EX. BLOCK WALL PAD GUTTER I 5% ON EX. GROUND 2~% LANDSCAPING �-2%-5% LANDSCAPING J 2%-5% LANDSCAPING SWALE SWALE SWALE PUBLIC LANDSCAPING SIDEWALK LANDSCAPING SIDE YARD SWALE W U J SECTION—A NORTH BOUNDARY ELEVATION SECTION—B NORTH BOUNDARY ELEVATION SECTION—C NORTH BOUNDARY ELEVATION SECTION—D WEST BOUNDARY H = 1"=10' H = 1"=10' H = 1"=10' H = 1"=10' Q V = 1'=10' V = 1'=10' V= 1'=10' V = 1'=10' I..L REAR YARD DRIVE EX. PROPERTY REAR YARD DRIVE EX. PROPERTY PL TB PL TB W LOT 1 34' 20' LOT 2 40' 20' FRONT YARD DRIVE EX. PROPERTY REAR YARD TB EX. PROPERTY PL TB PL W I I BLOCK WALL 22' 20' 25' FF PAD 2% I I FF PAD 8% LOT 3 I LOT 3 BLOCK WALL r 2%5% I v 2'1 Mq BLOCK WALL 2%-5% I FF GARAGE BLOCK WALL FF 14' 9' 2' ti X - LANDSCAPING I - 2%-5% BLOCK WALL 7 z 20% MAX. `� L LANDSCAPING 2%5% ICONC. DRIVEWAY I EX. GROUND PAD PAD SWALE LANDSCAPING I LANDSCAPING W 0 CONC. DRIVEWAYy-j EX. GROUND I CONC. DRIVEWAY I EX. GROUND EX. GROUND U SWALE BIO-RETENTION SECTION—E SOUTH BOUNDARY ELEVATION SECTION—F SOUTH BOUNDARY ELEVATION SECTION—G SOUTH BOUNDARY ELEVATION SECTION—H EAST BOUNDARY ELEVATION VERSION HISTORY H = 1"=10' H = 1"=10' H = 1"=10' H = 1"=10' V = 1'=10' V = 1'=10' V = 1'=10' V= 1'=10' LOT 1 PL LOT 2 LOT 2 PL LOT 3 11' 3' 4' VARIES I I I I PAD 10' 2 BLOCK WALL BLOC WALL z .7 2 SHEET PAD PAD FF 00 LANDSCAPING PAD PAD SWALE SWALE LANDSCAPING SWALE SWALE 5 OF 6 SECTION-1 PL ELEVATION SECTION—J PL ELEVATION TYPICAL BUILDING GRADING DETAIL x 1 1 H = 1"=10' H = 1"=10' H = 1"=10' V= 1'=10' V= 1'=10' V = 1'=10' SUBTPM20101 RESOLUTION NO.19-65 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM20101, A REQUEST TO SUBDIVIDE AN EXISTING 34,849 SQUARE FEET (0.80 ACRE) VACANT LOT INTO THREE LOTS, LOCATED IN THE LOW (L) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT LOCATED AT 7745 VINEYARD AVENUE AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN: 0208-091-44. A. Recitals. 1. Douglas Law, the property owner, filed an application for the issuance of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20101 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Parcel Map request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 23rd day of October 2019, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on October 23, 2019, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a vacant project site located east of Vineyard Avenue and south of Azurite Avenue, with street frontage along Vineyard Avenue. The specific location of the project site is 7745 Vineyard Avenue; and b. The scope of SUBTPM20101 is to subdivide the project site and establish lot lines for the future development of residential homes on three separate parcels. The architectural design of the homes on these lots will be submitted at a future date under a Design Review application. C. The General Plan Land Use designation of the project site and the properties surrounding the subject property is Low Residential. The Development Code zoning designation of the project site and the properties surrounding the subject property is Low Residential (L) District; and d. The project site is a parcel of approximately 34,849 square feet (0.80 acre) with dimensions of approximately 113 feet in length (north to south) by approximately 282 feet in width (east to west). The project site is located east of Vineyard Avenue and south of Azurite Avenue, with street frontage along Vineyard Avenue. The Vineyard Avenue frontage is currently PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 19-65 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM20101 — DOUGLAS LAW October 23, 2019 Page 2 unimproved. A number of trees are located throughout the site, with the majority located along the south property line. The site slopes north to south. The elevation at the north end is approximately 1319 feet whereas the elevation on the south end is approximately 1305 feet. e. The subdivision creates three separate residential lots. Parcel 1 and 2 are rectangular in shape. Parcel 3 is roughly trapezoidal in shape. Parcel 1 is located at the front of the site, along Vineyard Avenue. Access to Parcel 1 is provided via a proposed curb and driveway to be located at the northwest corner of the site. Parcels 2 and 3 are arranged behind Parcel 1. Access to Parcels 2 and 3 are provided via a shared driveway running along the southern boundary of the site and exiting onto Vineyard Avenue at the southwest corner of the site. The driveway is located within the boundary of Parcel 3 and includes a private access easement for the benefit of the owner(s) of Parcel 2. f. All parcels meet the depth,width and total area requirements of the Development Code. While the final design package for the home has not been submitted, the applicant has included a preliminary footprint configuration of the residences onsite. The configuration shows that that the all three residences will comply with the City's development standards applicable to lot coverage and setbacks standards in the Low (L) Residential District. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The design and layout of the subject Tentative Parcel Map will be consistent with the General Plan and Development Code. The project site is being subdivided to facilitate the development of three residential lots similar in scale and size to other residential lots in the neighborhood. Parcels 1 and 2 are roughly rectangular in shape and measure approximately 10,000 square feet. Parcel 3 is a trapezoidal-shaped flag lot measuring approximately 14,500 square feet.All three parcels comply with the lot depth,width and area requirements for residential lots in the Low Residential (L) District designation of the Development Code. The intended residential use of all three lots are consistent with the Low Residential land use designation of the General Plan and the Low Residential (L) District designation of the Development Code. b. The site is physically suitable for the proposed subdivision. The proposed subdivision will subdivide an existing residential parcel into three residential parcels. The Low Residential (L) District zoning designation of all three parcels is consistent with other Low Residential (L) District parcels in the neighborhood. All parcels are intended for single-family residences and is similar in density to other residential lots in the neighborhood. All three parcels are accessible via driveways extending from Vineyard Avenue. C. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat. The scope of the project is the subdivision of an existing residential lot into three separate residential lots. The project site is located within an existing residential neighborhood and has been previously graded. Additionally, no improvements are proposed within the scope of the project. Environmental impacts will be reviewed if and when future development occurs. d. The tentative parcel map is not likely to cause serious public health problems. The scope of the project is the subdivision of an existing residential parcel into three separate residential lots. The subdivision creates two additional residential lots similar in size to other PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 19-65 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM20101 — DOUGLAS LAW October 23, 2019 Page 3 residential lots in the neighborhood. Additionally, no improvements are proposed within the scope of the project. Public health impacts will be reviewed if and when future development occurs. e. The design of the tentative parcel map will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. The proposed subdivision will not conflict with existing public rights-of-way or easements along Vineyard Avenue. The tentative parcel map also includes public rights-of- way dedication that will improve access to the property. With existing and future public rights-of- way, unobstructed access will be provided to the individual proposed parcels from Vineyard Avenue. 4. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the Planning Commission finds that the project qualifies as a Class 15 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15315 — Minor Land Divisions. The project scope of work includes the subdivision of one residential lot into three residential lots. All three lots will remain in conformance with the General Plan and zoning, and no variances or exceptions are required. The project site is can be adequately accessed and serviced by existing utility and city services. The project site was not involved in a division from a larger parcel within the previous 2 years, and the parcel does not have average slopes of greater than 20 percent. The Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth in the attached Conditions of Approval incorporated herein by this reference. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF OCTOBER 2019. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Tony Guglielmo, Chairman ATTEST: Anne McIntosh, Secretary I, Anne McIntosh, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 23rd day of October 2019, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 19-65 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM20101 — DOUGLAS LAW October 23, 2019 Page 4 ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Conditions of Approval RANCHO[;i1CAMONCA Community Development Department Project#: SUBTPM20101 Project Name: EDR - TPM 20101 Location: 7745 VINEYARD AVE - 020809144-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Prior to the removal of any trees onsite, contact the Planning Department to determine if a Tree Removal Permit is required. A Tree Removal Permit will be required for all trees that meet the City's heritage trees requirement per Development Code section 17.16.080. Standard Conditions of Approval 2. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 3. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption fee in the amount of $50.00. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing or within 5 days of the date of project approval. 4. The approval or conditional approval of the tentative parcel map shall expire three (3) years from the date of adoption of the resolution by the Planning Commission approving or conditionally approving the map if a Final Map has not been filed with the county recorder or a time extension has not been granted. 5. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 6. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, Sections, and Conceptual Grading Plan on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein and the Development Code regulations. 7. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval and Conditions of Approval shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions www.CityofRC.us Printed:10/16/2019 Project#: SUBTPM20101 Project Name: EDR - TPM 20101 Location: 7745 VINEYARD AVE - 020809144-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Development Impact Fees Due Prior to Building Permit Issuance: (Subject to Change / Periodic Increases - Refer to current fee schedule to determine current amounts) Standard Conditions of Approval 2. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline): 33 total feet on Vineyard Avenue 3. Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&Rs or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map, or an easement for a joint use driveway shall be provided prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first 4. Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all public utility facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. Private easements for non-public facilities (vehicular access) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. 5. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Curb & Gutter A.C. Pvmt Side-walk Drive Appr. One Street Light Street Trees Notes: (a) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (b) Developer shall be responsible to coordinate and pay all costs to provide SCE power on City owned street lights. Coordinate with City staff for design and installation requirements. www.CityofRC.us Printed:10/16/2019 Page 2 of 11 Project#: SUBTPM20101 Project Name: EDR - TPM 20101 Location: 7745 VINEYARD AVE - 020809144-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 6. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. 7. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. b. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. c. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. 8. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on the public improvement plans (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Provide a legend on the public improvement plans per the subdivision guidelines. Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1)All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 9. All public improvements shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. 10. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. www.CityofRC.us Printed:10/16/2019 Page 3 of 11 Project#: SUBTPM20101 Project Name: EDR - TPM 20101 Location: 7745 VINEYARD AVE - 020809144-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 11. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 12. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. Including, but not limited to: Utility Pole Water Meter 13. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 14. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. 15. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. Building and Safety Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. When the Entitlement Review is approved submit complete construction drawings including structural calculations, energy calculations, and a soils report to Building and Safety for plan review in accordance with the current edition of the CA Building and Fire Codes including all local ordinances and standards. The new structure is required to be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers. Grading Section Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Prior to issuance of a wall permit, a copy of the Grading Special Conditions of Approval shall be included within the engineered wall plans and calculations. Standard Conditions of Approval www.CityofRC.us Printed:10/16/2019 Page 4 of 11 Project#: SUBTPM20101 Project Name: EDR - TPM 20101 Location: 7745 VINEYARD AVE - 020809144-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 2. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code and/or the California Residential Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 3. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 4. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by Engineering Services prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit. 6. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. All dust control sign(s) shall be located outside of the public right of way. 7. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to Engineering Services for review, the rough grading plan shall be a separate plan submittal and permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 8. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall(s) on property line(s) or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. 9. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on-site construction where possible, and shall provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 10. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the grading plan shall show that all manufactured slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way, permitted line, or the adjacent private property. All slope offsets shall meet the requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. www.CityofRC.us Printed:10/16/2019 Page 5 of 11 Project#: SUBTPM20101 Project Name: EDR - TPM 20101 Location: 7745 VINEYARD AVE - 020809144-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 11. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over-excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Engineering Services Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 12. Prior to issuance of a wall permit, on engineered combination garden/retaining walls along the property boundary the structural calculations for the wall shall assume a level toe/heel at the adjacent off-site property (i.e. a manufactured slope is not present). This shall be shown in the typical sections of the grading and drainage plan. 13. Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, the permitted grading plan (or architectural site plan) set shall show in each of the typical sections and the plan view show how the separations between the building exterior and exterior ground surface meet the requirements of Sections CBC1804.3/CRC R401.3, CBC2304.11.2.2/CRC R317.1(2) and CBC2512.1.2/CRC R703.6.2.1 of the current adopted California Building Code/Residential Code. 14. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall obtain a signed and notarized letter from the adjacent property owner(s) for ALL work proposed on the adjacent property. The letter shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set. The letter shall show on either the title sheet or a detail sheet of the grading and drainage plan set. 15. Prior to approval of the project-specific storm water quality management plan, the applicant shall submit to the Engineering Services, a precise grading plan showing the location and elevations of existing topographical features, and showing the location and proposed elevations of proposed structures and drainage of the site. 16. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Engineering Services for review and approval for on-site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. The report shall contain water surface profile gradient calculations for all storm drain pipes 12-inches and larger in diameter. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. In addition, the project specific drainage study shall provide inlet calculations showing the proper sizing of the water quality management plan storm water flows into the proposed structural storm water treatment devices. www.CityofRC.us Printed:10/16/2019 Page 6 of 11 Project#: SUBTPM20101 Project Name: EDR - TPM 20101 Location: 7745 VINEYARD AVE - 020809144-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 17. The site shall be rough graded to eliminate all cross-lot drainage, (except in approved facilities adjacent to private trails). All slopes and retaining walls necessary to accomplish this shall be installed prior to final map approval. 18. Flow lines steeper than 6 percent could be erosive. The applicant shall provide hard lined gutters and swales where concentrated flows exceed 3fps, and anywhere that flow lines exceed 10 percent. This shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan prior to issuance of a grading permit. 19. A review of the conceptual grading and drainage plan and the preliminary water quality management plan shows that it is the intent of the engineer of record to drain the surface storm water flows to a retention basin. The basin shall be designed to accept multiple storm events (100-year storm event and Antecedent Moisture Condition 3) using the methodology outlined in the current adopted San Bernardino County Hydrology Manual. 20. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall demonstrate that the storm water run-off will not adversely affect the downstream properties and that the water may legally discharge to the downstream properties. The engineer of record shall show on the final permitted grading and drainage plan one (1) or more of the following items are met: a) There is sufficient downstream capacity to accept the proposed storm water flows and that the downstream property owner have provided permission to accept the upstream storm water flows; b) a legal document/entity exists allowing developed storm water flows to be discharged to the property lower in elevation; c) a storm drain system to safely convey the storm water flows to a public storm drain system without causing flooding to adjacent property(ies). 21. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution 92-17, if a lot may not directly drain off-site directly to the street or other acceptable drainage device (such as a drainage ditch adjacent to an equestrian trail), then: a) drainage may flow from only one lot onto only one other lot; b) a drainage easement shall be provided over the lot accepting the drainage; c) the drainage shall be contained within either a concrete/rock lined swale/channel or a reinforced concrete pipe; and d) the drainage shall be designed with excess capacity to account for the probable lack of necessary maintenance, therefore, it shall be designed to convey two (2) times the runoff from a 100-year storm event with the minimum diameter of the pipe being 12-inches. 22. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the latest adopted California Plumbing Code. Private storm drain improvements shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan. 23. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy or final sign off by the Building Inspector the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) storm water treatment devices and best management practices (BMP). 24. Prior to approval of the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), the WQMP shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. www.CityofRC.us Printed:10/16/2019 Page 7 of 11 Project#: SUBTPM20101 Project Name: EDR - TPM 20101 Location: 7745 VINEYARD AVE - 020809144-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 25. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment devices and best management practices (BMP) as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan, shall be provided for by CC&R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the approval of the Water Quality Management Plan. Said CC&R's and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. 26. The Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (PWQMP) has been deemed "Acceptable". Prior to the issuance of a grading permit a final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by Engineering Services 27. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by Engineering Services and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 28. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment best management practices (BMP) devices, as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan, shall be provided for by CC&R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the issuance a grading permit. Said CC&R's and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. 29. The applicant shall prepare or amend existing CC&R's as needed to clarify how maintenance responsibilities will be shared between the newly created parcels and the remaining existing parcels of Parcel Map 20101 prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading and drainage plan and the CC&Rs shall address shared access to private drive aisle, private storm drains, storm water treatment devices, surface drainage and maintenance of common areas, including landscaping within public rights-of-way and Best Management Practices identified in the WQMP. 30. The HOA shall follow the inspection and maintenance requirements of the approved project specific Water Quality Management Plan and shall provide a copy of the inspection reports on a biennial basis to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. 31. A final project-specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be approved by the Engineering Services, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit or any building permit. 32. Prior to the issuance of a building permit or Engineering Services Department issued right of way permit, the applicant shall submit to Engineering Services, a final project specific water quality management plan for review and approval, and shall have said document recorded with the San Bernardino County Recorder's Office. www.CityofRC.us Printed:10/16/2019 Page 8 of 11 Project#: SUBTPM20101 Project Name: EDR - TPM 20101 Location: 7745 VINEYARD AVE - 020809144-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 33. The final project-specific water quality management plan (WQMP) shall include executed maintenance agreements along with the maintenance guidelines for all proprietary structural storm water treatment devices (BMP's). In the event the applicant cannot get the proprietary device maintenance agreements executed prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant is required to submit a letter to be included within the WQMP document, and scanned and pasted onto the Site and Drainage Plan which states that prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy with applicant shall enter into a contract for the maintenance of the proprietary storm water treatment device. If the proprietary storm water treatment device is part of a residential subdivision, prior to the sale of the residential lot, the developer shall include maintenance agreement(s) as part of the sale of the residential lot to the buyer. A copy of the maintenance agreements to be included in the sale of the property shall be included within the WQMP document. 34. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and approval of the project specific water quality management plan all private storm water catch basin inlets shall include insert filters to capture those pollutants of concern as addressed in the in the final project-specific water quality management plan (WQMP). At a minimum catch basin insert filters to capture trash and other floating debris. All catch basin insert filters shall be maintained on a regular basis as described in the "Inspection and Maintenance Responsibility for Post Construction BMP" section of the final project-specific water quality management plan. 35. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Project-Specific Water Quality Management Plan shall include a completed copy of "Worksheet H: Factor of Safety and Design Infiltration Worksheet" located in Appendix D "Section VII — Infiltration Rate Evaluation Protocol and Factor of Safety Recommendations, ..." of the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans. The infiltration study shall include the Soil Engineer's recommendations for Appendix D, Table VII.3: Suitability Assessment Related Considerations for Infiltration Facility Safety Factors". 36. Prior to approval of the final project-specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project-specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans". 37. The subject project, shall accept all existing off-site storm water drainage flows and safely convey those flows through or around the project site. If existing off-site storm water drainage flows mix with any on-site storm water drainage flows, then the off-site storm water drainage flows shall be treated with the on-site storm water drainage flows for storm water quality purposes, prior to discharging the storm water drainage flows from the project site. www.CityofRC.us Printed:10/16/2019 Page 9 of 11 Project#: SUBTPM20101 Project Name: EDR - TPM 20101 Location: 7745 VINEYARD AVE - 020809144-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 38. GROUND WATER PROTECTION: Prior to approval of the final project specific water quality management plan (WQMP), the WQMP document shall meet the requirements of the State Water Resources Control Board Order No. R8-2010-0036 (NPDES No. CAS 618036), the San Bernardino County Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Separation (MS4) Permit reads: Section XI.D(Water Quality Management Plan Requirements).8(Groundwater Protection): Treatment Control BMPs utilizing infiltration [exclusive of incidental infiltration and BMPs not designed to primarily function as infiltration devices (such as grassy swales, detention basins, vegetated buffer strips, constructed wetlands, etc.)] must comply with the following minimum requirements to protect groundwater: a. Use of structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause or contribute to an exceedance of ground water quality objectives. b. Source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration should be evaluated prior to infiltration. c. Adequate pretreatment of runoff prior to infiltration shall be required in gas stations and large commercial parking lots. (NOTE: The State Water Quality Control Board defines a large commercial parking lot as `100,000 sq. ft. or more of commercial development to include parking lot (with 100 or more vehicle traffics), OR, by means of 5,000sgft or more of allowable space designated for parking purposes'). d. Unless adequate pre-treatment of runoff is provided prior to infiltration structural infiltration treatment BMPs must not be used for areas of industrial or light industrial activity{77), areas subject to high vehicular traffic (25,000 or more daily traffic); car washes; fleet storage areas; nurseries; or any other high threat to water quality land uses or activities. e. Class V injection wells or dry wells must not be placed in areas subject to vehicular{78} repair or maintenance activities{79}, such as an auto body repair shop, automotive repair shop, new and used car dealership, specialty repair shop (e.g., transmission and muffler repair shop) or any facility that does any vehicular repair work. f. Structural infiltration BMP treatment shall not be used at sites that are known to have soil and groundwater contamination. g. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall be located at least 100 feet horizontally from any water supply wells. h. The vertical distance from the bottom of any infiltration structural treatment BMP to the historic high groundwater mark shall be at least 10-feet. Where the groundwater basins do not support beneficial uses, this vertical distance criteria may be reduced, provided groundwater quality is maintained. i. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause a nuisance or pollution as defined in Water Code Section 13050. www.CityofRC.us Printed:10/16/2019 Page 10 of 11 Project#: SUBTPM20101 Project Name: EDR - TPM 20101 Location: 7745 VINEYARD AVE - 020809144-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 39. RESIDENTIAL MANDATORY MEASURES — CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE — Prior to the issuance of any building permit the applicant shall comply with Section 4.106.2 (Storm water drainage and retention during construction) of the current adopted California Green Building Standards Code: Projects which disturb less than one (1) acre of soil and are not part of a larger common plan of development which in total disturbs one acre or more, shall manage storm water drainage during construction. In order to manage storm water drainage during construction, one or more of the following measures shall be implemented to prevent flooding of adjacent property, prevent erosion and retain soil runoff on the site. 1. Retention basins of sufficient size shall be utilized to retain storm water on the site. 2. Where storm water is conveyed to a public drainage system, collection point, gutter or similar disposal method, water shall be filtered by use of a barrier system, wattle or other method approved by the enforcing agency (City of Rancho Cucamonga). 3. Compliance with a lawfully enacted storm water management ordinance. 40. RESIDENTIAL MANDATORY MEASURES — CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE — Prior to the issuance of any building permit the applicant shall comply with Section 4.106.3 (Grading and Paving) of the current adopted California Green Building Standards Code: Construction plans shall indicate how the site grading or drainage system will manage all surface water flows to keep water from entering building. Examples of methods to manage surface water include, but are not limited to, the following: 1. Swales. 2. Water collection and disposal systems. 3. French drains. 4. Water retention gardens. 5. Other water measures which keep surface water away from buildings and aid in groundwater recharge. Exception: Additions and alterations not altering the drainage path. 41. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout "Information for Grading Plans and Permit". 42. Prior to issuance of Grading Permit or WQMP approval, provide letter from soils engineer that wall/structure may be within 10 feet of bio retention basin. 43. Prior to issuance of grading permit, submit wall plans to Building & Safety for separate wall permit. Provide those plans as REFERENCE during Grading Plan Check review. For wall along East boundary line, minimum footing is 3 feet. 44. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy by the Building Official, or his designee, the civil engineer of record shall file a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Post Construction Storm Water Treatment Devices As-Built Certificate with the Environmental Programs Coordinator, City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Services Department. www.CityofRC.us Printed:10/16/2019 Page 11 of 11 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 23, 2019 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Anne McIntosh, Planning Director INITIATED BY: Dat Tran, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: DESIGN REVIEW DRC2018-00946 - SUNSET VISTA DESIGNS COMPANY, INC. - A request for site plan and architectural review of an industrial building totaling 33,067 square feet on 1.67 acres of land located west of Hickory Avenue and south of Arrow Route in the General Industrial (GI) District at 13289 Arrow Route; APN: 0229-171-17, -18. This item is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA guidelines under CEQA Section 15332 — In-Fill Development Projects. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission approve Design Review DRC2018-00946 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval. SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project site is an existing 1.67-acre vacant lot located within the General Industrial (GI) District, at the southwest corner of Arrow Route and Hickory Avenue. The site is generally flat and at-grade with Arrow Route and Hickory Avenue. A slight north to south downward slope exists on the property, with an overall grade change of roughly 5 feet. The project site's street frontages are currently unimproved. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning Designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Vacant General Industrial General Industrial (GI) District North Single-Family Residences Low Medium Low Medium (LM) Residential Residential District South Industrial Warehouse Facility General Industrial General Industrial (GI) District West General Contractor's Office General Industrial General Industrial (GI) District East City of Fontana N/A N/A PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DESIGN REVIEW DRC2018-00946 — SUNSET VISTA DESIGNS COMPANY, INC. October 23, 2019 Page 2 BACKGROUND: The site is currently improved with perimeter block walls and wrought iron fencing along the west and south property line. Perimeter chain-link fencing have also been installed along the north and east property lines, along +Arrow Route and Hickory Avenue. No other structures have been approved or constructed at the project site. ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicant, Sunset Vista Designs Company, Inc., is proposing to construct a 33,067 square-foot industrial warehousing building on the project site. The building consists of 30,522 square feet of warehousing space and 2,545 square feet of office space. Two access points will be provided to the property, one at Arrow Route at the northwest corner of the property and one at Hickory Avenue at the southeast corner of the property. A single driveway will connect both egress points to provide circulation through the site and access to parking and two loading docks. Parking, truck storage and walkway areas extend from the driveway and wrap around the west and south side of the building. A total of 38 parking spaces are provided to meet the minimum parking requirements. The project also includes two truck- well areas near the loading docks for large truck/trailer parking. Overall, the project site complies with the applicable Development Standards as indicated in the table below: Development Required Proposed Complies? Standard Max. 35 feet (at front Building Height setback) 39 feet (at 4 feet YES 75 feet (1 foot increment from setback line) from the setback line Floor Area Ratio FAR 50-60% 50 % YES Front Setback (Arrow Min. 45 feet 47 feet YES Route Street Side Yard Setback (Hickory Min. 25 feet 28 feet YES Avenue Interior Side Yard Min. 5 feet 65 feet YES Setback Rear Yard Setback Min. 0 feet 35 feet YES Parking Setback Min. 25 feet (Arrow Route) 65 feet YES The proposed industrial building meets the City's 360-degree design standards. The building fagades incorporate a variety of materials, including concrete, metal cladding, and vision and spandrel glass. Architectural articulation and material breaks are used throughout the fagade to break up the building's massing, and the use of metal cladding helps emphasize the tower elements of the building. Additional architectural features, such as windows and decorative canopies, will be incorporated throughout each elevation to create visual interest on the building and reduce the amount of blank walls. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DESIGN REVIEW DRC2018-00946 — SUNSET VISTA DESIGNS COMPANY, INC. October 23, 2019 Page 3 The project also complies with the City's landscape standards. Site landscape coverage exceeds the minimum requirement of 10% and includes an overall depth of 47 feet along Arrow Route and 28 feet along the Hickory Avenue. The landscaping palette includes a variety of trees, shrubs, and ground cover to help screen mechanical equipment and enhance the appearance of the building. The project will also incorporate a 510 square foot employee break area as required by the Development Code for new industrial buildings. B. Public Art: The project is required to provide public art as outlined in Chapter 17.124 of the Development Code. Per Chapter 17.124, newly constructed industrial facilities are required to provide art work with a value equal to or exceeding one dollar per square foot of the facility. In lieu of providing the art required, the applicant may also donate art work to the City or pay an in-lieu fee into the City's public art trust fund. A condition of approval is included within the Draft Resolution of Approval specifying the requirements for the artwork. In-lieu fees are paid prior to the issuance of building permits. Donated artwork and artwork installed onsite are required prior to occupancy of the building. C. Neighborhood Meeting: A neighborhood meeting was conducted on September 11, 2019 for the proposed project. Property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site were notified of the meeting via mailed notices. No residents attended the meeting. D. Design Review Committee: The project was reviewed by the Design Review Committee (Wimberly, Oaxaca, and Smith)on October 1, 2019 (Exhibit H). Principal Planner, Mike Smith, suggested that the double-detector check device be moved to the Hickory Avenue frontage. The applicant stated that he would check with Cucamonga Valley Water District and relocate the device if possible. The Committee recommended that the project move forward as presented to the Planning Commission for final review and approval. E. Environmental Assessment: The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 32 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 — In-Fill Development Projects, as the project is a proposed development occurring within city limits on a project site less than five acres in size and substantially surrounded by urban uses. The project is a 33,067 square foot warehouse building located on 1.67 acres of land within the General Industrial (GI) District. The warehouse use is consistent with the intent of the General Industrial (GI) designation in the General Plan and project meets all applicable development standards and zoning regulations of the Development Code. The warehouse building is similar in scale and is consistent with industrial buildings in the nearby vicinity. The site can be adequately served all required utilities and police and fire services. A number of environmental studies were prepared to assess any potential impacts that the project might have on the environment. A Biological Site Assessment (Griffith Wildlife Biology, June 30, 2019)found that the project site's habitat consisted of non-native plant species and did not support native coastal sage scrubs. The Assessment also determined that there were no riparian or wetland habitats that would support sensitive, threatened or endangered species, including the endangered Delhi Sands Flower Loving Fly. An Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Analysis (Enviroassessors, Inc., February 2019) conducted found that the project would not exceed the applicable Southern California Air Quality Management District's PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DESIGN REVIEW DRC2018-00946 — SUNSET VISTA DESIGNS COMPANY, INC. October 23, 2019 Page 4 threshold for air quality and greenhouse gas emissions during construction or operational activity. A Trip Generation Memorandum (Ganddini Group, May 2019) forecasted 73 passenger car equivalent (PCE) daily trips, including 5 PCE trips during the AM peak hour and 8 PCE trips during the PM peak hour. The Memorandum concluded that there are no apparent safety or operational concerns with implementation of the project. An Industrial Noise Study(Acoustics Group, Inc., July 2019) concluded that the project's noise contribution to adjacent roadways would be less than significant and that the on-site operation noises levels will be less than the City's 80 dBA maximum noise level standards for industrial use. A Conceptual Water Quality Management Plan was submitted and reviewed by the City's grading engineer. The City's grading engineer approved the conceptual design and will review the final design when grading plans are submitted. Therefore, staff finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. FISCAL IMPACT: The project proponent will be responsible for paying one-time impact fees. These fees are intended to address the increased demand for City services due to the proposed project. The types of services that these impact fees would support include library services, transportation, infrastructure, animal services, police, parks, and community and recreation services. The proposed development will increase the value of the project site and the parcels will be assessed an annual property tax. A percentage of this annual tax is shared with the City. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: While no specific City Council goals are addressed, General Plan Policy LU-3.7 encourages new development projects to build on vacant in-fill sites within a built-out area. The vacant project site is within the General Industrial (GI) District and is adjacent to industrial warehouse developments to the south and west. The proposed warehouse building will enhance our Premier Community Status by providing well-designed industrial buildings that are complementary to the surrounding development and will provide additional employment opportunities for residents and the region. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing with a regular legal advertisement in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. To date, no comments have been received regarding the project notifications. EXHIBITS: Exhibit A - Site Aerial Exhibit B - Site Vicinity Plan Exhibit C - Site Plan Exhibit D - Floor & Roof Plans Exhibit E - Building Elevations Exhibit F - Landscape Plan Exhibit G - Design Review Committee Action Comments (October 1st, 2019) Draft Resolution 19-66 Recommending Approval of Design Review DRC2018-00946 ■ M' 1IL 0 - 1 11 t i mLA G �qm a � _ IL� tom• � 1i � 04 �_ I� ,`� I y 1 i� � Ce k* rx F r I - •' +• A I �_ 1 r� ww � h La r 1 �2 , ��'� i'I� � .�� � � �� .ice' - , LFOm 1�6 �. + IV - - 1 _ (Project Site 77. i 14 I.�, * AW Exhibit A Site Aerial .ARROW PTA nmjY. . r 1. i ,N v 7` rT 2_ . DESIGN: N _- _ tl, _ � 00 O.C.DESIGN& 00 ENGINEERING SITE UTILIZATION _ 4 9o,GHoc9 A o rico RivERA.cA 9aeso .`17'1—. EL sez eaz 999aHFA.cse3 v,e n3s ec.L., ,o9b i r ' OWNER: APR WONDER GROUP LLC ..SIXTH STREET RANGHOGUGAMONGA,GA91)3G TEL19997521- ADDRESS: 13261 ARROW RTE RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA PROJECT NO.:A-18-011 DRC2018-00946 SITE PLAN Exhibit B uml 13261 ARROW RTE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA ARROW ROUTE _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ lo E NEIGHBOR DRIVEWAY 54'-11" NEW DRIVEWAY 35-0" 35-0" 26-0" FIRE LANE ' CLEAR TO THE SKY PROJECT DATA o 13 0L PROPERTY LINE 245'-0" - ' DESCRIPTION AREAS BUILDING 339067 S.F. r TOTAL AREA U o 3 ZONING GI -"GENERAL INDUSTRIAL" O C? o -1 T FIRST WAREHOUSE 27,938 S.F. 0 o FLOOR OFFICE 1,942 S.F. Q LOT 385,FONTANA ARROW ROUTE TRACT NO.2102,IN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, TOTAL FOOTPRINT 29,880 S.F. m q N o J PROJECT STATE OF CALIFORNIA&THE EAST 55 FEET OF THE WEST 110 FEET OF LOT 385,FONTANA 4 - (tam, 9 DESCRIPTION 10 U ARROW ROUTE TRACT N0.2102,AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 31 OF MAPS,PAGES 11 as co � o I I N THROUGH 15,INCLUSIVE,RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY MEZZANINE STORAGE/SAMPLE 2,584 S.F. I w Q I r\ MIN.SETBA�K u ' FLOOR OFFICE 603 S.F. W ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO: 0229-171-18-0-000 &0229-171-17-0-000 TOTAL MEZZANINE 3,187 S.F. I Z O LOCAL STREE - Q QBUILDINGDI ENSION 160'-0' 25'-0" I , BUILDING CODE CBC 2016 TOTAL WAREHOUSE 30,522 S.F. 92 TOTAL 1E1 PARKING a 21 Ivw I B : OFFICE BLDNG. TOTAL OFFICE 2,545 S.F. 8 NOT A PART a as , I �D 1 6 3'-0" R.O.W. BLDG. OCCUPANCY S1 : WAREHOUSE PARKING REQUIRED : - --- ----- EDICATIO BUILDING TYPE III-B, FULLY WAREHOUSE 1/1,000 UP TO 20,000 S.F. 20,000/1,000 = 20 CARS PRINKLERED WAREHOUSE 1/2,000 OVER 20,000 S.F. 10,522/2,000 = 5 CARS 2 . r � r �- r- - 0 18 I _1 = (_4- I I� � � � � _____ I OFFICE 4/1,000 2,545/250 = 10 CARS ELECTRI AL I LAND AREA : GROSS ±73,143 S.F. (±l.67 AC) - NET±67,440 S.F. (±l.54 AC) TOTAL = 35 CARS �o t SCREENWALL I 1 / I I �_ , COVERAGE : 50% FAR PARKING PROVIDED: 8'-0" HIGH CONCRETE TILT-UP WALL, PAINTED wQ= = 50- 60�o FAR ACCESSIBLE (STANDARD) 14' X 18' 1 -STALLS TO MATCH BLDG. COLOR (TYPICAL) ' 28 > , FF E I ALLOWABLE AREA ACCESSIBLE (8' RAMP) 17' X 18' 1 -STALLS IEI I 9 s• . STANDARD STALLS 9' X 18' 30-STALLS >�J Q ® Z ooR I 2O LANDSCAPED AREA REQUIRED NET LANDSCAPED AREA PROVIDED = © E�©© CLEAN AIR STALLS 9' X 18' 3-STALLS W=° ° ME NNE 1, 14 F p I 10%OF THE TOTAL PARCEL INCLUDING 11,433 S.F. (16.9�0) 13'-0" , U o EV CAPABLE STALLS 14' X 18' 3-STALLS = BUILDING -1 - _ T AL 5 S.F. 6 1 SETBACKS ALONG FRONTAGE AVERAGE LANDSCAPING WIDTH: Z a \ i I TOTAL REQUIRED = 6,741 S.F. @ ARROW RT= 45' @ HICKORY AV. = 25' TOTAL 38-STALLS - ai > o I ' AREA JUSTIFICATION LONG TERM BIKE RACK @ 5%OF PARKING 2 SPACES PART a� W`O a ® i SHORT TERM BIKE RACK @ 5%OF PARKING 2 SPACES i �j M I PER TABLE 506.2 ARROW ROUTE:MAJOR ARTERIAL,SETBACK=45' _ a� U J J W i HICKORY AVE, LOCAL STREET,SETBACK=25' 2 SPACE Q�� J MEZZANINE Z BUILDING SIDE SETBACK=5' TRUCK PARKING REQUIRED o W a' wa= Q F-1 -S1 - 111B = 48,000 S.F. TRUCK PARKING PROVIDED 2 SPACE - SLOPE ? <% 3,000 S.F. BUILDING AREA = 33,067 SF <48,000 SF REAR SETBACK=0' ' "' 21 MAX. HT. OF BUILDING PER TABLE 17.36.040, 35' AT FRONT SETBACK, 75, MAX. HEIGHT TRASH ENCL. AREA PROVIDED TOTAL 190 S.F. �I 1 '12 MAX Z '-0" Q= � a u MAX. HT. OF BUILDING 55' (CBC TABLE 504.3 TYPE IIIB) a i �22 ANTED' > O O i all 12A --------� 19 BUILDING 33,067 S.F. 1 0 TOTAL AREA o O TRA L FIRST WAREHOUSE 27,938S.F. I I TOTAL EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA - 0 SF FLOOR OFFICE 1,942S.F. cn I 33'-0" 9 19 TOTAL FOOTPRINT s9,8sos.F. o I TOTAL NEW IMPERVIOUS AREA - 56,007 SF I D = KEY NOTES: IEI BUILDING I = MEZZANINE STORAGE SAMPLE 2,584 S.F. �o NOT A 15 FLOOR OFFICE 603S.F. N 11'-01, 1❑ CONCRETE TITL-UP WALL 14'-0" CONCRETE LANDING 23 TOTAL MEZZANINE 3,187 S.F. z I PARKWAY PART , ; 60'-0" 48'-0" 52'-0" ° " �2 AC PAVING IN PARKING AREA - RESURFACE AS REQUIRED NOTE: THE TRASH ENCLOSURE SHALL BE - z Lu GRADED SO THAT STORAGE CONTAINERS �'- uI � o o o I i PARKING STALL STRIPPING (PER CITY OF RANCHO Y- REMAIN AT REST WITHOUT AUXILIARY I CUCAMONGA STDS.) TYPICAL RESTRAINING DEVICES. _ j 1 � I I 4 LANDSCAPING I 1 \ \ m Am TRASH ENCLOSURE - \ \ Q El 1 I I El BUILDING ENTRANCE. �. . i \ \ \ v) SCALE 1/41 ■ 1'-01 I 1 \ \ \ o \ \ \ I TRASH ENCLOSURE / RECYCLING AREA (PER CITY 1 \ o II { \\ \ \ �\ OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STDS.) TYPICAL SCREENWALL BEHIND \\ \\ \ 38 19 I ❑7 CONCRETE TRUCKWELL , \ \ \\ 1 19 , I ' -yQ \ �8 9' X10' TRUCK DOOR (DOCK HIGH) TYP. SITE � \� 3 0 I 16' X14' TRUCK DOOR (GRADE LEVEL) TYP. N \ I VICINITY MAP O \\ FE 17 Y I >- I I 20 10 8 HIGH CONCRETE TILT UP SCREEN WALL, PROVIDE GRAFFITI-PROOF NOT To VICINITY 3 __ ���I —��So�-o'�� =III I 14'-0" J COATING TO MATCH THE BUILDING, SEE ELEVATIONS. SIDE 6'-0" HIGH CONCRETE TILT-UP I Iwo 1 1 1 8'-0" WROUGHT IRON FENCE METAL TRASH ENCLOSURE N a N ' SELF-LATCHING GATES WALL, PAINTED TO MATCH - I 30'-0" W 4 PAINTED TO MATCH THE BLDG. COLOR (TYPICAL) 1'-0"OVERHANG, TYPICAL TYPICAL I 12 8'-0" HIGH W.I. GATE BUILDING COLOR — o o N a g I 12A '_ " 0o I LLo 4 , 8 0 SLIDING W.I. GATE o �So'-o" -J 8 12B 1 12B 8'-0" SWINGING W.I. GATE I 14 I�� 1 : I a PROVIDE ENHANCED PAVEMENT FOR THE SITE ENTRY AREA: SAW CUT CONCRETE AS t2o'- ---- ---- ----- � SHOWN AND PROVIDE TOP CAST ACID WASH MEDIUM GRAPHITE COLOR, SEE C, D & F w w 21'-0" I 103'-0" BUILDING DIME 10N 101'-01, Q o 14 FIRE DEPARTMENT FIRE ACCESS LANE CLEAR TO THE SKY o � FRONT Eq__A 7 PARALLEL STALLS @ 24'-0" = 168'-0" 2 = w o U o z 15 TRASH ENCLOSURE PER THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STANDARDS B- TRASH ENCLOSURE ELEVATIONS I 24'-0" 24'-0" 24'-0" 24'-0" 24'-0" 24'-0" 24'-0" N [16] TRANSFORMER PAD - COMPLETELY SCREENED FROM PUBLIC VIEW SCALE 1/41 ■ 1'-01 J o I [17] DOUBLE CHECK DETECTOR VALVE - COMPLETELY SCREENED FROM PUBLIC VIEW PROPERTY LINE 245'-0" F18] EMPLOYEE OUTSIDE EATING AREA, 510 SF 11 10 22 Fl-91 INTERIOR ROOF DRAIN WITH PROTECTIVE BOLLARD. F20] (E) POWER POLES TO BE UNDERGROUND Q 21 (N) KNOX BOX ACCORDING TO FIRE DISTRICT STANDARD 5-9 DESIGN: Lu 22 (N) HYDRANTS ACCORDING FIRE DISTRICT STANDARD 5-10 o = p■ O. C. DESIGN & � `" ME: ENGINEERING IEI INDUSTRIAL BUILDING Lu w 9'-o" 7901 CROSSWAY DR. PICO RIVERA, CA 90660 NOT A PART TEL (562)942-9804 FAX (562)948-1735 N r WOOD TRELLIS OWNER : SITE PLAN CONCRETE COLUMN TO APR WONDER GROUP L LC MATCH BUILDING, SCALE 1' ■ 20'-0' SEE A3 FOR ELEVATIONS 9850 SIXTH STREET 35'-0" PATIO FURNITURE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 2'-0" EQ. EQ. EQ. EQ. 2'-01, 16'-6" PER LANDSCAPING PLAN TEL (909)527-8870 ADDRESS 2'-0" 3'-9" 3'-0" 3'-9" 2'-0" 01 � - N � 13261 ARROW RTE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA o - PROJECT NO. : A-18-01 1 0 0 ENHANCED CONCRETE PAVING,SEE C DRC2018-00946 J/ \ w U W w o � SITE PLAN rr C? d 1 - \ r 2'-0" FF Lu -� "I TYP. N O ✓ C- ENHANCED PAVEMENT D- ENHANCED PAVEMENT E- ENHANCED PAVEMENT F- EMPLOYEE BREAK AREA SCALE 1/41 ■ 1'-01 SCALE 1/41 ■ 1'-01 EXPOSED AGGREGATE COLORED CONCRETE W/ SCORE LINES SCALE 1/41 ■ 1'-01 At L ■ m1k 13261 ARROW RTE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 160'-0" 10 55'-0" 48'-0" 52'-0" lo 5'-0" 22--g" o 58'-0" TYPP.. / 20'-0" 4'-0„ 15'-4" 21'-3" 15'-6" i� F - 10'-0" 10'-0" I - --- ----- --_ I p it11 i [-v] : ® ®Ilk III k _ =-----I -- ---------- rP--�- -----� r — II i II II I I PRIVATE I I IF I l II I OFFICE I I II CD SIDE LIGHT I II TYPICAL AT = II I J ALL DOORS PRESIDENT ' o SIDE LIGHT OFFICE TYPICAL AT ALL DOORS 'n I o 2 N i' CONDITIONED STORAGE MEZZANINE "SAMPLE ROOM" 21 -0" I I ' / I 1 ® � 1'-6"TYP. 1� L I ® O F ---------- J I ElRAMELESS GLASSI L PARTITION I STORAGE I I I I MEZZANINE -----� FLOOR PLAN KEY NOTES: I s � I 1❑ BUILDING ENTRANCE o F2] CONCRETE TILT UP WALL, TYPICAL WAREHOUSE F3] STUD WALL, TYPICAL N - [4] CONCRETE SLAB PER STRUCTURAL Fr- GLAZING, TYPICAL 3 - MEZZA OFFICE PLAN :A �6 STEEL BUILDING COLUMN (TYP.) SCALE 1/81 ■ 1'-01 II I N L ❑ ❑ ❑ 7 6' X 7' FULL LITE DOUBLE DOORS, TYPICAL �o ❑8 3' X 7' HOLLOW METAL MAN DOOR c° PAINTED TO MATCH THE BUILDING, 57'-10" — TYPICAL lo loe18'-0" 15'-1" 20'-9" 15'-0" 9' X 10' DOCK HIGH DOOR, TYPICAL 6-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 12' X14' TRUCK DOOR (GRADE LEVEL) I — I o 1 1 STAIRS TO MEZZANINE Fr Lo I o PRIVATE PRIVATE ELECTRIC II {: L9 MEZZANINE LINE ABOVE OFFICE OFFICE ROOM 3 LOBBY '-0" ° o 13 42" HIGH GUARD PASS THROUGH TYP. LL WINDOW z 14 FULL HEIGHT OFFICE PERIMETER WALL 5'-4" TYP 15 ACCESSIBLE BATHROOMS co PRIVATE ® o OFFICE OPEN � "r. I _ ❑ OFFICE t CONF. — SIDE LIGHT TYPICAL ROOM AT ALL DOORS c Lo PASS THROUGH 1'-6"TYP. WINDOW - J/ c b \ DESIGN: i DOOR WITH _ ---- --- FULL HEIGHT o \ _ LIGHT I �L - O Lo p■ O. C. DESIGN & 0 FIXED 00 ENGINEERING - WELFARE WINDOWS _ _N I DOOR WITH VISION PANEL 7901 CROSSWAY DR. PICO RIVERA, CA 90660 I \�� WAREHOUSE I TEL (562)942-9804 FAX (562)948-1735 F-1 4'-0" I II OWNER ,o - - - - � J APR WONDER GROUP LLC ---- I I ---_J I ----- 9850 SIXTH STREET 4-0„ RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 I — — — — — — — — TEL (909)527-8870 ADDRESS : 59'-0" 101'-0" 13261 ARROW RTE N RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA N PROJECT NO. : A-18-01 1 2 - F.F. OFFICE PLAN DRC2018-00946 SCALE 1/81 ■ 1'-01 1 - FLOOR PLAN FLOOR PLANS SCALE 3/321 ■ 1'-01 At L L mlk 13261 ARROW RTE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 160'-0" lo 0 0 , ------� � � 20'-0" 4'-0" cj- o Ol II i i IF- /11'9"�9 �° o �O O o �. O N Ilr 7 II II o o J I� \9 o 0 WHITE REFLECTIVE COATING TYP. AT ROOF AT OFFICE �' AND MEZZANINE (HATCHED AREA) PROVIDE 2X6 MIN. 0\,* SUB-PURLINS "TOP GUARD 5000" BY JOHNS MANVILLE O' V. II OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT, THERMAL EMITTANCE AND �� SOLAR REFLECTANCE, OR SRI VALUES IN ACCORDANCE O* WITH A5.106.1 1.2.1 CAL GREEN 2013 II LL MIN. 1/4"/ FT. MIN. 1/4"/ FT. SLOPE DN. SLOPE DN. l A II 6'0 CAST IRON ROOF DRAIN 1 "X 9"OVERFLOW SCUPPERS AREA OF SLOPE 5,488 S.F. �r Q II II II LL 8"0 CAST IRON ROOF DRAIN 12"X 9"OVERFLOW SCUPPERS 2B AREA OF SLOPE 11,401 S.F. 0 lEl 2B l II II II II ROOF PLAN KEYNOTES 5 1❑ CONCRETE PARAPET WALL-SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR THICKNESS �2 ROOF DRAIN 1 2A INTERIOR ROOF DRAIN & INTERIOR OVERFLOW 2B INTERIOR ROOF DRAIN & EXTERIOR OVERFLOW 1 II �3 PLYWOOD BUILT-UP CRICKETS, PROVIDE MIN. 1/4" PER FOOT SLOPE c�II II ]4 ROOF ADDRESS LETTERS PAINTED IN BLACK, WHEN REQUIRED BY THE CITY II SHALL BE PER CITY REQUIREMENTS, BUT SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN 4'-0" J DN. SLOPPEE FT.DN. HIGH w/MIN. 12"WIDE STROKE PER LETTER -CONTRACTOR SHALL SLOPE DN MIN. 1 FT. MIN. 1 CONFIRM ACTUAL ADDRESS NUMBER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION 3 CLASS"A"4 PLY B.U.R.SYSTEM BYJM SPEC 4/GNC OR APPROVED O EQUAL UL 790 CONSISTING OF: p �•�� 13261 • 28 lb. GLASS BASE SHEET, MECHANICALLY FASTENED-1 LAYER • 11 lb. GLASS PLY SHEET-2 LAYERS • 78 lb. GLASS CAP SHEET- 1 LAYER 8"0 CAST IRON ROOF DRAIN • H.M.P. ASPHALT MOPPING BETWEEN LAYERS 12"X 9"OVERFLOW SCUPPERS r4] rill, ROOF ACCESS HATCH AREA OF SLOPE 8,459 S.F. 2B El \�O� �7 HVAC UNIT COMPLETELY SCREENED FROM PUBLIC VIEW SEE ELEVATIONS 6"O CAST IRON ROOF DRAIN o 12"X 9"OVERFLOW SCUPPERS AREA OF SLOPE 5,548 S.F. LL Fp �l ti• 3 U///, 0 2B DESIGN: �� II p■ O. C. DESIGN & MISL PE DN. \�\ II 00 ENGINEERING J 7901 CROSSWAY DR. PICO RIVERA, CA 90660 o TEL (562)942-9804 FAX (562)948-1735 OWNER : 1 ; APR WONDER GROUP LLC I 9850 SIXTH STREET RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 F3] TEL (909)527-8870 ul ADDRESS 13261 ARROW RTE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA PROJECT NO. : A-18-01 1 59'-0" 101'-0" D R C2018-00946 FLOOR PLANS N 1 - ROOF PLAN P ge 2 of 2 ) SCALE 3/32• ■ 1'-0• M lk Fd ?1 (7) 6 m I ji 1% m At L 13261 ARROW RTE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 14 KEY NOTES: 11 20 ETI CONCRETE TITL-UP WALL - TYPICAL 19 19 10 9 1 3 17 MAX. PARAPET HEIGHT \ STOREFRONT GLAZING - TYPICAL —�___�-- _--- _ -;I VERAGE ROOF HEIGHT ---- \ LINE OF ROOF BEYOND SHOWN DASHED FOR CLARITY CLEAR HEIGHT \4 16' X 14' TRUCK DOOR - GRADE LEVEL I z + 8 9'-0" X 10' TRUCK DOOR - DOCK HIGH - TYPICAL 1 0 � 00 v Lu co v 161 - 3' X 7' MAN DOOR PAINTED TO MATCH THE ADJACENT WALL, TYPICAL m Q Q I MEZ , NINE Q co `L cLLJo i �\� m \ _, U m \ TRUCK LOADING - PER GRADING PLAN O r o \8 HORIZONTAL REVEAL - TYPICAL B I o FIR IT F O Ii iiF9 VERTICAL REVEAL - TYPICAL C E m 6 6 2 12 2 17 9 8 10 PANEL JOINT - TYPICAL CAP 16 Ll F1_11 PROPOSED LOCATION OF MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT COMPLETELY 15 SCREENED FROM VIEW WITH LONGBOARD SCREEN WALL NORTH ELEVATION @ ARROW ROUTE 12 LONGBOARD CLADDED ACCENT, COLOR: CHARCOAL SCALE 1/161 ■ 1'-01 F1 WALL PACK LIGHTING FIXTURE LITHONIA D-SERIES SIZE 2 LED AREA LUMINAIRE, TYPICAL [14] CLERESTORY WINDOW, TYPICAL F1 DECORATIVE STEEL CANOPY TO PROVIDE MIN. 4' OF SHELTER AT ACCESS DOOR CLADDED WITH ALUMINUM [16] 8'-0" HIGH CONCRETE TILT UP SCREEN WALL TO MATCH BUILDING [17] SPANDREL GLASS 12 E F_[�] 12 9 1 12 [18 8'-0" HIGH WROUGHT IRON FENCE, SEE DETAIL ON THIS SHEET & 10 3 19 SHEET A-1 F[ ] 1 - ---- - H 12" PROJECTED METAL CANOPY ABOVE WINDOW ———————— ———— ---- --- ---------- --- I I I II II I 13261 ARROW RT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, BUILDING ADDRESS w Z - - o l �IIII ACCORDING TO FIRE DISTRICT STANDARD 5-8 w op n J U wmcoww cy) --- - — — w Lu Z w Q � Q 17 6 COLOR SCHEDULE (EXTERIOR COLORS) : EAST ELEVATION @ HICKORY ST. SCALE 1/16" = 1 '-0" FIELD COLOR DE6374 Silver Polish ACCENT 1 COLOR DE6376 Looking Glass MATERIAL ACCENT LONGBOARD ALUMINUM CLADDING CHARCOAL GLAZING PPG SOLAR BLUE LOW-E SOLARBAN 60 (2) DUAL GLAZING 17 11 19 9 10 19 3 14 1 13 SPANDREL GLAZING PPG SOLAR BLUE LOW-E SOLARBAN 60 W/ BLUE BACKING TOP OF PARAPET II ---------------- --- --------- - II I I II I II I I Z II I II I I + Q 8 II z z_ _ IIiii p O N = II I I I w o U w c) I I I I = 1 co Q O MEZZAN E IIIL _23 i i i Q `' m O w I I I Lu cn II I 0 I 0 8 I U o II I I I II F \ A I 1 I Q M o ;Y -- ^ II I 1 1 p +I co FIRST FLO R II ° 2„ I I — i 4 3,. 1„ 3„ 717 — E15 12 2 6 16 4 4' b 4' a 4 2 4 F51— 18 MIS ° a N rINN 1. ° - M� DESIGN: WEST ELEVATION ° '� °a a o SCALE 1/16" = 1 '-0" < ° p■ O. C. DESIGN & a a ■E: ENGINEERING TYP. PANEL JOINT 2" HORIZONTAL REVEAL 2" VERTICAL REVEAL 7901 CROSSWAY DR. PICO RIVERA, CA 90660 DETAIL — A DETAIL — B DETAIL — C TEL (562)942-9804 FAX (562)948-1735 OWNER : 3 9 19 1 13 10 14 16GAGE 8'-0"MAXIMUM 1"X 1" PICKET,TYPICAL 14 GAGE APR WONDER GROUP LLC 11 2"X 2" HORIZONTAL,TYPICAL ___ __ _ 9850 SIXTH STREET I r------ ---- --- ------ --_ -- -� RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 TEL (909)527-8870 I I 0 = HORIZONTAL REVEAL w _ ADDRESS : e i 'o w 2 X 10 TREATED o0 $ 9 $ � � Q `� Q � WOOD TRELLIS z ASPHALT 13261 ARROW RTE I RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA I I I PROJECT NO. : A-18-01 1 I I I D R C2018-00946 4 TYPICAL\ 16 18 ; ELEVATIONS SOUTH ELEVATION CONCRETE COLUMNS 0 2500 PSI CONCRETE 3"T.S. POST @ 8'-0"O.C.,TYPICAL TO MATCH BUILDING 7 ol FOOTING, TYPICAL "'THICK SCALE 1/16" = 1 '-0" SHADE STRUCTURE WROUGHT IRON FENCE DETAIL SCALE 1/8'' = 1 '-0" SCALE 1/4'' = 1 '-0" BY PLANTING NOTES REVISIONS PLANT LEGEND 6tlorea vercry el pity o� °tntirynee the INSTALL ROOT BARRIERS TO ALL PROPOSED ect rvOTE:ROUGHEry 4DE5 OF HOtE NE(5)F Any eem"�'��en(a)t!m 1. HARD SURFACE:NOT AROUND N ena%ore me eentr°<tor,Sell a„°me,vII re,p°na bnlry,or ali one<eDOF NR TABS OR THE ROOT BALL. as en,Weis to,elnreagwe.ucnnm,Rron°° 1o��e:°Pl�e m� Tpeicp-evue " iI MUMLC H va�N S ALAIOeeN Oy� v onn ] 3mae Sunk _ p mim nthe te at ell um —ea t g mor REZMOVE SHRUBS I ALL-TBREE aeluaMMc ` (an- s)H ppE mm.— gs gMal pe om o ' UNDISTURBED AOE ® C c 1,1.cny°mmunMeao 3 MULCH LAYS 3' 1S' O g g g meem THE ORDINPLIE AND APPLIED QU cu plan matencle.See plcnnng aetcim rc pc ung ona etck�nsq%gvy�ng«w ememe. R RAGE THE ORDINANCE USE OF PPLIEIR TN THE ® u Ile°Roaenk° Rosenko g wllec 5 ga Low t9 5 PERENNIALS .tin i. nna/°.° n.r s n mn.. .memyI,C°ntrmm�.9pn°rn t°ansbgnUm. FNISH GRADE FlNISH SURFACE THE EFFICIENT USEOF WATER IN THE NOSOAPE DESIGN PLAIN are M bmna °m am t. THAN R00iBR RGD BA ®O EAML PER a ,bo till" g Pt., V nave ,Sell g e_c1a_c_nel,time,N. 9 rat anll,,e m NDISNRRED 3oIL 'NoREPORT OMIGAL 3o LB ¥�nlme<n°mn es a<r g Low BO 5 m pe. ere n O L m.Nna 9 Nna 1w ,. PROVIDE ROO BARRIER,O DNE R o aq L— MIN.BY Iz'DEEP FOR REEB gnMl° gmm Tm gm BerNe to eII tie.tre plem w NIn m t r,n be ISM Sea per PLANTED HIN 5 OF PA�D AREA enure penmaer,age er me well pm°terId' ^ ^,wrew°,twe weu,.me rem anme.,nml tie m,mll°reena �1 TTRREE PLANTING DETAIL ( yopo Um p°eowm p,oav°ta byopo�m n°t, p°t®12 0.<. g P a b u II w •I m �J T' ® Roamormna o.proatmwa woatmte Roaamoly MAY PHIL nma Low 2] p a 12 0.<. M row a lu tie g o o a pee a grc e.. ot PHIL ' ,ea g,o a mo g.,a c penoa or irty(3ojeaaye cner cam (. 1.) AAH ry gg tn pM o a1,o �i�My(eo)oe CA U ]36 193]We 9 M1etre "a Me elwwa elgne o,ecx o,vlgo era pl"E,e impop y p M y e Comrector,Hell be removal ena reps°a gmine'ton4c<tu net no"seoN to�ne'Pvner??" PHona:909 3731959 ARROW ROUTE Fa.: 9D93731956 Linear Style Planting with DeepRoot Barriers ABOVE TO BE r pm.y®NIIIm vaeelg Aoa(rAENE4� 0` N FOR OTHER °. wm.q"Iney eeq �xu. FINISH GRADEPECIfY P t.wn Axe tw w.x.wemm.m w S Iooy w.om un Ire,ory Mw n a n ROO— anm'Rewxenemi"aPl�irag ww ee nm geenl•W I xIn," exa"aPw w dmm x wen�''jueeuvte u d �o•win��•m �Mx^"I ROOTBALLOMICAL SOILS CRT M aa"mw wn N.wneAvre•He)mine aw 9wde ones a mrs wmrre ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ I •men ♦ a o:'""q/ a lwal ar ung ew rxanmemvrn•. iu UNDISTURBED BIN BOTTOM if Nw prewl e�wae'rew y."e•N"�ue m. PLANT p' g P L OIL ;.'..' .. when ImPn.nwi•misg oaq"M umeael Banm u a F u tie ea(el a n.w�x1 m iwnuw....wa.xn oe u��Mna yeu w nM w leln w>gma.wMn s a...xx.y.•.em um xy.e.uwyn aow.aa w NOTE-U-IF O ATO.1 r IMnn. eme «m Inmmen,b,n mo.en em ama re>w. z SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL T. -iate",see,. gmoNv�w I B� mom,M 1 s m1-1_mlnl, I �? mid e ".d= a� mom,pp"Po� o sEurva°inon NS°Pnanc �^ I Fs Poll—LEGEND DISTANCE 1ARIES SEE3 p NOTE:ROOT BARRIERS SHALL BE 1T DEEPS (g P (L 11 &LINEAR APPLICATION ONLY. u Io-z s"yz'�Ienl�w PLAIN VIEW FINISH GRADE z ROGTBAU-I "PERFI ~- yy REPORT GNOMCAL SgLS Q UNDSTURSED SAL z (L "y GROUNDCOVER PLANTING DETAIL z 3 =�IaN v�y, N.T� I a g K 5 o Y U Y 5 W Z m Y a 0 V € d V Z 5 < O e U`O W Q :g a of €r p O 3 z W E EGu Exhibit F ¢5 �Ms 5 nrosizme �� vtieoee mm Y IZ.1..1 N 1 L-1 0' 16' 32'40'48' °. s DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:00 p.m. Dat Tran October 1, 2019 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2018-00946 - SUNSET VISTA DESIGNS COMPANY, INC. - A request for site plan and architectural review of an industrial building totaling 33,057 square feet on 1.67 acres of land located west of Hickory Avenue and south of Arrow Route in the General Industrial (GI) District at 13289 Arrow Route; APN: 0229- 171-17, -18. This item is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA guidelines under CEQA Section 15332 — In-Fill Development Projects, Site Characteristics and Background: The project site is an existing vacant lot located within the General Industrial (GI) District, at the southwest corner of Arrow Route and Hickory Avenue. The site is generally flat and at-grade with Arrow Route and Hickory Avenue. A slight north to south downward slope exists on the property, with an overall grade change of roughly 5 feet. The site is surrounded by single-family residential homes to the north, a general contractor's office to the west, and a large warehouse facility to the south. The project site is bounded to the east by Hickory Avenue and the City boundary line between the City of Fontana. The project site's street frontages are currently unimproved. Project Overview: The applicant, Sunset Vista Designs Company, Inc., is proposing to construct a 33,057 square-foot industrial warehousing building on the project site. The building consists of 29,807 square feet of warehousing space and 3,250 square feet of office space. Two access points will be provided to the property, one at Arrow Route at the northwest corner of the property and one at Hickory Avenue at the southeast corner of the property. A single driveway will connect both egress points to provide circulation through the site and access to parking and two loading docks. Parking, truck storage and walkway areas extend from the driveway and wrap around the west and south side of the building. A total of 38 parking spaces are provided to meet the minimum parking requirements. The project also includes two truck-well areas near the loading docks for large truck/trailer parking. Overall, the project site complies with the applicable Development Standards as indicated in the table below: Development Standard Required Proposed Complies? Max. 35 feet(at front setback) 39 feet (at 4 feet Building Height 75 feet(1 foot increment from YES the setback line) from setback line) Floor Area Ratio FAR 50-60% 50 % YES Front Setback (Arrow Min. 45 feet 47 feet YES Route Street Side Yard Setback (Hickory Min. 25 feet 28 feet YES Street Interior Side Yard Min. 5 feet 65 feet YES Setback Rear Yard Setback Min. 0 feet 35 feet YES Parking Setback Min. 25 feet(Arrow Route) 65 feet YES The proposed industrial building meets the City's 360-degree design standards. The building Exhibit G DRC COMMENTS DESIGN REVIEW DRC2018-00946 - SUNSET VISTA DESIGNS COMPANY, INC. October 1, 2019 Page 2 fagades incorporate a variety of materials, including concrete, metal cladding, and vision and spandrel glass. Architectural articulation and material breaks are used throughout the fagade to break up the building's massing, and the use of metal cladding helps emphasize the tower elements of the building. Additional architectural features, such as windows and decorative canopies, will be incorporated throughout each elevation to create visual interest on the building and reduce the amount of blank walls. The project also complies with the City's landscape standards. Site landscape coverage exceeds the minimum requirement of 10% and includes an overall depth of 47 feet along Arrow Route and 28 feet along the Hickory Avenue. The landscaping palette includes a variety of trees, shrubs, and ground cover to help screen mechanical equipment and enhance the appearance of the building. The project will also incorporate a 510 square foot employee break area as required by the Development Code for new industrial buildings. Staff Comments: Staff supports the proposed site layout and design of the proposed project. Overall, the building meets the city's development code standards and architectural standards for industrial developments. The project also provides adequate parking for both personal vehicles and delivery trucks to accommodate the industrial use and operation. Major Issues: The following design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project: 1. None. Secondary Issues: Once all the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues: 1. None. Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion: 1. The project is subject to the public art requirement per Development Code Chapter 17.124. 2, All Double Detector Checks (DDC) and Fire Department Connections (FDC) required and/or proposed shall be installed at locations that are not within direct view or line-of- sight of the main entrance. The specific locations of each DDC and FDC shall require the review and approval of the Planning Department and Fire Construction Services/Fire Department. All Double Detector Checks (DDC) and Fire Department Connections (FDC) shall be screened behind a 4-foot high block wall. These walls shall be constructed of similar material used on-site to match the building. 3. All ground-mounted equipment, including utility boxes, transformers, and back-flow devices, shall be surrounded by a minimum of two rows of shrubs spaced a minimum of 18 inches on-center. All ground-mounted equipment shall be painted dark green except as directed otherwise by the Fire Department. 4. The employee break area shall have an overhead trellis with cross members spaced no more than 18 inches on center with minimum dimensions of 4 inches by 12 inches. DRC COMMENTS DESIGN REVIEW DRC2018-00946- SUNSET VISTA DESIGNS COMPANY, INC. October 1, 2019 Page 3 Each support column shall have a decorative base that incorporates the architectural design and finishes/trim used on the building. The trellis shall be painted to match the building. Tables, chairs/benches, and waste receptacles shall be provided. 5. All wrought iron fences and sliding gates shall be painted black or similarly dark color. 6. All walls, including retaining walls, exposed to public view shall be constructed of decorative masonry blocks, i.e., slump stone, split-face, or have a decorative finish such as stucco texture to match a concrete tilt up wall. 7. All dock doors shall be painted to match the main color of the building. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Committee review the Design Review application and provide comments as warranted. if the Committee finds the project acceptable, staff recommends the proposed Design Review DRC2018-00946 be forwarded to the Planning Commission for their review and approval. Staff Report: Design Review Committee Action: Staff Planner: Members Present: Staff Coordinator: RESOLUTION NO.19-66 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW DRC2018-00946, A REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW OF A PROPOSED 33,067 SQUARE FOOT INDUSTRIAL WAREHOUSE BUILDING ON A VACANT SITE TOTALING 1.67 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL(GI)DISTRICT,AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ARROW ROUTE AND HICKORY AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0229-171-17, - 18. A. Recitals. 1. Sunset Vista Designs Company, Inc. filed an application for the approval of Design Review DRC2018-00946 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Design Review is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 23rd day of October 2019, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on October 23, 2019 including written and oral staff reports,togetherwith public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located within the City; and b. The application applies to a project site located west of Hickory Avenue and south of Arrow Route at 13289 Arrow Route. The General Plan Land Use designation of the project site is General Industrial. The Development Code zoning designation of the project site is General Industrial (GI) District; and C. The properties to the north of the subject property, on the other side of Arrow Route, consists of single-family residences in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District. The property to the south consists of an industrial warehouse building in the General Industrial (GI) District. The property to the west consists of a general contractor's office and is also located in the General industrial (GI) District. The properties to the east, on the other side of Hickory Avenue, is located in the City of Fontana; and d. The project site has previously been improved with perimeter block walls and wrought iron fencing along the west and south property line. Perimeter chain-link fencing have also PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 19-66 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2018-00946 — Sunset Vista Designs Company, Inc October 23, 2019 Page 2 been installed along the north and east property lines, along the Arrow Route and Hickory Avenue. No other structures have been approved or constructed at the project site. e. The applicant, Sunset Vista Designs Company, Inc., is proposing to construct a 33,067 square-foot industrial warehousing building on the project site. The building consists of 30,522 square feet of warehousing space and 2,545 square feet of office space.Two access points will be provided to the property, one at Arrow Route at the northwest corner of the property and one at Hickory Avenue at the southeast corner of the property. A single driveway will connect both egress points to provide circulation through the site and access to parking and two loading docks; and f. Parking, truck storage and walkway areas extend from the driveway and wrap around the west and south side of the building. A total of 38 parking spaces are provided to meet the minimum parking requirements.The project also includes two truck-well areas near the loading docks for large truck/trailer parking; and g. Overall, the project site complies with the applicable Development Standards for the General Industrial (GI) District. The proposed warehouse building maintains a 47 foot setback from Arrow Route and a 28 foot setback from Hickory Avenue. The minimum setback from Arrow Route and Hickory Avenue are 45 feet and 25 feet, respectively. The warehouse building also maintains a 65 foot setback along the interior side (west) property line and a 35 feet setback along the rear property line. The minimum interior side property line setback is 5 feet.There is no minimum rear yard setback.The maximum height of the proposed warehouse facility is 39 feet. Highest point of the facility is located four (4) feet behind the front setback line. The building conforms with the height limit of the General Industrial (GI) District, which permits a maximum height of 39 feet when located 4 feet back from the setback line; and h. The proposed industrial building meets the City's 360-degree design standards. The building fagades incorporate a variety of materials, including concrete, metal cladding, and vision and spandrel glass. Architectural articulation and material breaks are used throughout the fagade to break up the building's massing, and the use of metal cladding helps emphasize the tower elements of the building. Additional architectural features, such as windows and decorative canopies,will be incorporated throughout each elevation to create visual interest on the building and reduce the amount of blank walls; and i. The project also complies with the City's landscape standards. Site landscape coverage exceeds the minimum requirement of 10%and includes an overall depth of 47 feet along Arrow Route and 28 feet along the Hickory Avenue. The landscaping palette includes a variety of trees, shrubs, and ground coverto help screen mechanical equipment and enhance the appearance of the building.The project will also incorporate a 510 square foot employee break area as required by the Development Code for new industrial buildings. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan.The site is located within land designated as General Industrial.The General Industrial designation permits a wide range of industrial activities that include warehousing and office uses.The project consists of a PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 19-66 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2018-00946 — Sunset Vista Designs Company, Inc October 23, 2019 Page 3 33,067 square foot industrial building, including 2,545 square foot dedicated to office space,on 1.67 acre of land. The warehouse building is designed for wholesale warehousing with ancillary office uses.All site improvements, including parking and landscaped areas,are designed to be consistent with the warehousing use and are consistent with the General Industrial land use as designated in the General Plan. b. The proposed use is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. The Development Code designates the project site as a General Industrial (GI)District. The potential industrial and warehousing land uses that would be associated with this project are consistent with the General Industrial(GI)District.The project site is adjacent to other sites in the General Industrial (GI) District, including an industrial warehouse building of similar size and scale to the south of the project site. The project site has a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of 0.50 and within the 0.50 to 0.60 FAR range permitted in the General Industrial (GI) District. C. The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. The facility is designed for industrial warehouse operations with ancillary office space to support the main warehousing use. The facility meets all setbacks, floor area and height requirements.The facility has also been designed to meet the City's architectural standards. The facility will also comply with all parking, access and landscaping requirements. Therefore, the project meets all applicable provisions of the Development Code. 4. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the Planning Commission has determined that the project is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 32 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332—In-Fill Development Projects, as the project is a proposed development occurring within city limits on a project site less than five acres in size and substantially surrounded by urban uses.The project is a 33,067 square foot warehouse building located on 1.67 acres of land within the General Industrial (GI) District. The warehouse use is consistent with the intent of the General Industrial (GI) designation in the General Plan and project meets all applicable development standards and zoning regulations of the Development Code. The warehouse building is similar in scale and is consistent with industrial buildings in the nearby vicinity. The site can be adequately served all required utilities and police and fire services. A number of environmental studies were prepared to assess any potential impacts that the project might have on the environment. A Biological Site Assessment (Griffith Wildlife Biology, June 30, 2019)found that the project site's habitat consisted of non-native plant species and did not support native coastal sage scrubs. The Assessment also determined that there were no riparian or wetland habitats that would support sensitive,threatened or endangered species, including the endangered Delhi Sands Flower Loving Fly. An Air Quality&Greenhouse Gas Analysis (Enviroassessors, Inc., February 2019) conducted found that the project would not exceed the applicable Southern California Air Quality Management District's threshold for air quality and greenhouse gas emissions during construction or operational activity. A Trip Generation Memorandum (Ganddini Group, May 2019)forecasted 73 passenger car equivalent(PCE)daily trips, including 5 PCE trips during the AM peak hour and 8 PCE trips during the PM peak hour. The Memorandum concluded that there are no apparent safety or operational concerns with implementation of the project. An Industrial Noise Study(Acoustics Group, Inc., July 2019)concluded that the project's noise contribution to adjacent PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 19-66 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2018-00946 — Sunset Vista Designs Company, Inc October 23, 2019 Page 4 roadways would be less than significant and that the on-site operation noises levels will be less than the City's 80 dBA maximum noise level standards for industrial use. A Conceptual Water Quality Management Plan was submitted and reviewed by the City's grading engineer. The City's grading engineer approved the conceptual design and will review the final design when grading plans are submitted. Therefore, staff finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth Paragraphs 1,2,3 and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the applications subject to each and every condition in the attached Standard Conditions incorporated herein by this reference. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23rd DAY OF OCTOBER 2019. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Tony Guglielmo, Chairman ATTEST: Anne McIntosh, Secretary I, Anne McIntosh, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed,and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 23rd day of October 2019, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Conditions of Approval RANCHO[;i1CAMONCA Community Development Department Project#: DRC2018-00946 Project Name: EDR -Arrow Rte Industrial Location: 13289 ARROW RTE - 022917118-0000 Project Type: Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. All Double Detector Checks (DDC) and Fire Department Connections (FDC) required and/or proposed shall be installed at locations that are not within direct view or line-of-sight of the main entrance. The specific locations of each DDC and FDC shall require the review and approval of the Planning Department and Fire Construction Services/Fire Department. All Double Detector Checks (DDC) and Fire Department Connections (FDC) shall be screened behind a 4-foot high block wall. These walls shall be constructed of similar material used on-site to match the building. 2. All ground-mounted equipment, including utility boxes, transformers, and back-flow devices, shall be surrounded by a minimum of two rows of shrubs spaced a minimum of 18 inches on-center. All ground-mounted equipment shall be painted dark green except as directed otherwise by the Fire Department. 3. The employee break area shall have an overhead trellis with cross members spaced no more than 18 inches on center with minimum dimensions of 4 inches by 12 inches. Each support column shall have a decorative base that incorporates the architectural design and finishes/trim used on the building. The trellis shall be painted to match the building. Tables, chairs/benches, and waste receptacles shall be provided. 4. All wrought iron fences and sliding gates shall be painted black or similarly dark color. 5. All walls, including retaining walls, exposed to public view shall be constructed of decorative masonry blocks, i.e., slump stone, split-face, or have a decorative finish such as stucco texture to match a concrete tilt up wall. 6. All dock doors shall be painted to match the main color of the building. Standard Conditions of Approval 7. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 8. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval, Conditions of Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. www.CityofRC.us Printed:10/16/2019 Project#: DRC2018-00946 Project Name: EDR -Arrow Rte Industrial Location: 13289 ARROW RTE - 022917118-0000 Project Type: Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 9. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption fee in the amount of $50.00. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing or within 5 days of the date of project approval. 10. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 11. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 12. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations. 13. This project is subject to the public art requirement outlined in Chapter 17.124 of the Development Code. No final approval, such as a final inspection or a certificate of occupancy, for any development project subject to this chapter shall be granted or issued unless and until the requirements of this chapter have been met. In consideration of any phasing plan or project completion schedule, the city may accept bonds or other surety to assist in the completion of the project, provided they are in a form and manner acceptable to the planning director and city attorney. Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical) on the project side of Hickory Avenue shall be undergrounded from the first pole on the west side of Hickory Avenue south to the first pole of site south of the project boundary, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. 2. Street lights shall be owned by the City. The developer shall be responsible to coordinate and pay all costs of street lights and to provide power to City owned street lights. 3. Development impact fees per the engineering fee schedule are due prior to issuance of building permits. *Noe that fees are subject to change/increase annually. Standard Conditions of Approval 4. Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. www.CityofRC.us Printed:10/16/2019 Page 2 of 12 Project#: DRC2018-00946 Project Name: EDR -Arrow Rte Industrial Location: 13289 ARROW RTE - 022917118-0000 Project Type: Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 5. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline): 50 total feet on Arrow Route 33 total feet on Hickory Avenue 6. ** CD Information Required Prior to Sign-Off for Building Permit Prior to the issuance of building permits, if valuation is greater or equal to $100,000, a Diversion Deposit and a related administrative fee shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 65% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Applicant must identify if they are self-hauling or utilizing Burrtec prior to issuance of a building permit. Proof of diversion must be submitted to the Environmental Engineering Division within 60 days following the completion of the construction and /or demolition project. Contact Marissa Ostos, Environmental Engineering, at (909) 774-4062 for more information. Instructions and forms are available at the City's website, www.cityofrc.us, under City Hall / Engineering / Environmental Programs/Construction & Demolition Diversion Program. 7. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 8. Add the following note to any private landscape plans that show street trees: "All improvements within the public right-of-way, including street trees, shall be installed per the public improvement plans." If there is a discrepancy between the public and private plans, the street improvement plans will govern. www.CityofRC.us Printed:10/16/2019 Page 3 of 12 Project#: DRC2018-00946 Project Name: EDR -Arrow Rte Industrial Location: 13289 ARROW RTE - 022917118-0000 Project Type: Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 9. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Hickory Avenue Curb & Gutter A.C. Pvmt Side-walk Drive Appr. Street Lights Street Trees Arrow Route Curb & Gutter A.C. Pvmt Side-walk Drive Appr. Street Lights Street Trees 10. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. www.CityofRC.us Printed:10/16/2019 Page 4 of 12 Project#: DRC2018-00946 Project Name: EDR -Arrow Rte Industrial Location: 13289 ARROW RTE - 022917118-0000 Project Type: Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 11. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch pvc with pull rope or as specified. e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all corners of intersections per latest ADA standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Manager prior to submittal for first plan check. www.CityofRC.us Printed:10/16/2019 Page 5 of 12 Project#: DRC2018-00946 Project Name: EDR -Arrow Rte Industrial Location: 13289 ARROW RTE - 022917118-0000 Project Type: Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 12. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on the public improvement plans (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Arrow Route Botanical Name - Ginkgo biloba 'Fairmont' Common Name - Maidenhair Tree Spacing- 20' OC Size - 15 gallon min. Hickory Avenue Botanical Name - Geijera parviflora Common Name -Australian Willow Spacing- 25' OC Size - 15 gallon min. Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1)All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 13. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. 14. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 15. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 16. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. www.CityofRC.us Printed:10/16/2019 Page 6 of 12 Project#: DRC2018-00946 Project Name: EDR -Arrow Rte Industrial Location: 13289 ARROW RTE - 022917118-0000 Project Type: Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Gates installed across a fire lane are required to be in accordance with Standard 5-4. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section. 2. Roof access is required to be in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-6. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section. 3. If high-piled combustible storage is planned or anticipated, fire department access doors are required in accordance with the California Fire Code. Door identification is required to be in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-5. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section. 4. Knox Box(es) are required in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-9. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section. 5. Building street address signage is required to be in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-8. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section. 6. Temporary fire apparatus access (fire lanes) and temporary fire hydrants, if needed, are required to be in accordance with Fire District Standard 33-2. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section. 7. Public and private fire service water mains, public and private hydrants, and other fire protection water related devices and equipment are required to be provided, designed, and installed in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-10. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section. 8. Fire flow shall be in accordance with Appendix B for all buildings except schools, which shall be in accordance with Appendix BB. The Fire District has adopted both appendices without local amendments and allows all reductions, minimum fire flows, and calculated demands as published in the appendices. Proof of the availability of the required fire flow must be provided to the Fire District. Fire flow information is obtained from the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD). CVWD can be reached at 909-944-6000 or custserv@cvwdwater.com. Proof of available fire flow is required to be in the form of a letter from CVWD that is dated within the past 12 months. Building and Safety Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions www.CityofRC.us Printed:10/16/2019 Page 7 of 12 Project#: DRC2018-00946 Project Name: EDR -Arrow Rte Industrial Location: 13289 ARROW RTE - 022917118-0000 Project Type: Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Building and Safety Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. When the Entitlement Review is approved submit complete construction drawings including structural calculations, energy calculations and soils report to Building and Safety for plan review in accordance with the current edition of the CA Building and Fire Codes including all local ordinances and standards which are effective at the time of Plan Check Submittal. The new structures are required to be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers per the CBC and Current RCFPD Ordinance. Disabled access for the site and building must be in accordance to the State of CA and ADA regulations. If it is anticipated that there will be a need for temporary fire protection water supply and/or temporary fire access, submit a separate plan for review and approval that complies with RCFD Standard 33-3. The developer and architect are responsible for reproducing all the applicable fire standards on the plans and designing the project to meet all applicable regulations of the adopted standards at the time of plan check submittal. The Fire Standards and Guidance Documents are available on the City's web site www.cityofrc.us follow the path from the home page to city hall/fire district/prevention/fire code standards. Coordinate the locations trees found in the landscape plans with the required roof access ladder points required on the buildings per Standard 5-6. Annexation of this parcel to the CFD is required and must be completed before Building permits are issued. Grading Section Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Prior to issuance of a wall permit, a copy of the Grading Special Conditions of Approval shall be included within the engineered wall plans and calculations. Standard Conditions of Approval 2. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code and/or the California Residential Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 3. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 4. A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 5. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. www.CityofRC.us Printed:10/16/2019 Page 8 of 12 Project#: DRC2018-00946 Project Name: EDR -Arrow Rte Industrial Location: 13289 ARROW RTE - 022917118-0000 Project Type: Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 6. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit. 7. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. All dust control sign(s) shall be located outside of the public right of way. 8. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, the rough grading plan shall be a separate plan submittal and permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 9. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall(s) on property line(s) or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. 10. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Grading and Drainage Plan shall show the accessibility path from the public right of way and the accessibility parking stalls to the building doors in conformance with the current adopted California Building Code. All accessibility ramps shall show sufficient detail including gradients, elevations, and dimensions and comply with the current adopted California Building Code. 11. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on-site construction where possible, and shall provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 12. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the grading plan shall show that all manufactured slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way, permitted line, or the adjacent private property. All slope offsets shall meet the requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 13. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the grading and drainage plan shall show the maximum parking stall gradient at 5 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current adopted California Building Code. 14. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official. 15. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond project boundary. 16. This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. www.CityofRC.us Printed:10/16/2019 Page 9 of 12 Project#: DRC2018-00946 Project Name: EDR -Arrow Rte Industrial Location: 13289 ARROW RTE - 022917118-0000 Project Type: Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 17. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over-excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 18. Prior to issuance of a wall permit, on engineered combination garden/retaining walls along the property boundary the structural calculations for the wall shall assume a level toe/heel at the adjacent off-site property (i.e. a manufactured slope is not present). This shall be shown in the typical sections of the grading and drainage plan. 19. Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, the permitted grading plan (or architectural site plan) set shall show in each of the typical sections and the plan view show how the separations between the building exterior and exterior ground surface meet the requirements of Sections CBC1804.3/CRC R401.3, CBC2304.11.2.2/CRC R317.1(2) and CBC2512.1.2/CRC R703.6.2.1 of the current adopted California Building Code/Residential Code. 20. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall obtain a signed and notarized letter from the adjacent property owner(s) for ALL work proposed on the adjacent property. The letter shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set. The letter shall show on either the title sheet or a detail sheet of the grading and drainage plan set. 21. Prior to approval of the project-specific storm water quality management plan, the applicant shall submit to the Building Official, or his designee, a precise grading plan showing the location and elevations of existing topographical features, and showing the location and proposed elevations of proposed structures and drainage of the site. 22. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on-site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. The report shall contain water surface profile gradient calculations for all storm drain pipes 12-inches and larger in diameter. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. In addition, the project specific drainage study shall provide inlet calculations showing the proper sizing of the water quality management plan storm water flows into the proposed structural storm water treatment devices. www.CityofRC.us Printed:10/16/2019 Page 10 of 12 Project#: DRC2018-00946 Project Name: EDR -Arrow Rte Industrial Location: 13289 ARROW RTE - 022917118-0000 Project Type: Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 23. Roof water is not permitted to flow over the public parkway and shall be directed to an under parkway culvert per City of Rancho Cucamonga requirements prior to issuance of a grading permit. 24. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the latest adopted California Plumbing Code. Private storm drain improvements shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan. 25. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy or final sign off by the Building Inspector the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) storm water treatment devices and best management practices (BMP). 26. Prior to approval of the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), the WQMP shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 27. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 28. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID). The WDID number shall also be shown on the WQMP Site and Drainage Plan document. 29. The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the structural storm water treatment devices, commonly referred to as BMPs, to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 30. A final project-specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be approved by the Building and Safety Director, or his designee, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit or any building permit. 31. The Site and Drainage Plan in the final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan shall show the locations of all roof downspout drains. if required for storm water quality purposes, the downspouts shall include filters. 32. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Project-Specific Water Quality Management Plan shall include a completed copy of "Worksheet H: Factor of Safety and Design Infiltration Worksheet" located in Appendix D "Section VII — Infiltration Rate Evaluation Protocol and Factor of Safety Recommendations, ..." of the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans. The infiltration study shall include the Soil Engineer's recommendations for Appendix D, Table VII.3: Suitability Assessment Related Considerations for Infiltration Facility Safety Factors". 33. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy by the Building Official, or his designee, the civil engineer of record shall file a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Post Construction Storm Water Treatment Devices As-Built Certificate with the Environmental Programs Coordinator, City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Services Department. www.CityofRC.us Printed:10/16/2019 Page 11 of 12 Project#: DRC2018-00946 Project Name: EDR - Arrow Rte Industrial Location: 13289 ARROW RTE - 022917118-0000 Project Type: Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 34. Prior to approval of Grading permit and Final WQMP: Provide Roof plans as reference to ensure BMPs are properly sized for DMAs A & B Standard Conditions of Approval 1. After hours of construction operation, vehicle and pedestrian gates and openings shall be secured . Padlocks used for securing gates shall be designed to prohibit cutting of locks. Locking gates shall be secured with minimum of 3/8-inch-thick, 30 grade coil chain, or minimum 5/16-inch cable. 2. "No trespassing" signs listing California Penal code section 602, shall be installed at all construction site access points. 3. Forklifts shall be rendered inoperable when hours of operation are ceased, making them unable to start, operate or move. Removing forks and securing them satisfies this requirement. www.CityofRC.us Printed:10/16/2019 Page 12 of 12 CITY . ■ . ■ . ■ • STAFF REPORT DATE: October 23, 2019 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Anne McIntosh, Planning Director INITIATED BY: Mena Abdul-Ahad, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2018-01014 — RAMY IBRAHIM —A request for site plan and architectural review of a proposed 4,040 square foot single- family residence with an attached 435 square foot garage on a 10,411 square foot lot within the Low (L) Residential District and within the Hillside Overlay District at 7563 Alta Cuesta Drive - APN: 0207-044-29. This item is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA guidelines under CEQA Section 15303— New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures, which permits the construction of a single- family residence in a residential zone. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission take the following action: • Approve Hillside Design Review DRC2018-01014 through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: The project site is a 10,411 square foot vacant parcel located on the east side of Alta Cuesta Drive north of Camino Norte, within the Low (L) Residential District and the Hillside Overlay District. The property dimensions are approximately 114 feet along the north property line, 106 feet along the east property line, 95 feet along the west property line, and 94 feet along the south property line. The lot has a downslope elevation of approximately 1,460 feet as measured along the curb face along the east property line and an elevation of approximately 1,455 feet as measured along the west property line, for a maximum grade change of approximately 5 feet from the west to east property lines. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning Designations for the project site and the surrounding properties are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Vacant Low Residential Low (L) Residential District Hillside Overlay District North Single-Family Residence Low Residential Low (L) Residential District Hillside Overlay District South Single-Family Residence Low Residential Low (L) Residential Hillside Overlay District PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT HDR DRC2018-01014 — RAMY IBRAHIM October 23, 2019 Page 2 East Single-Family Residence Low Residential Low (L) Residential Hillside Overlay District West Single-Family Residence Low Residential Low (L) Residential Hillside Overlay District ANALYSIS: A. Project Overview: The applicant, on behalf of his client, proposes to construct a 4,040 square foot two-story, single-family residence on the project site. The proposed grading includes up to 7 feet of fill and 4 feet of cut, which necessitates approval by the Planning Commission (5-foot max cut or fill for Planning Director approval, pursuant to Section 17.122.020.G.1.i). Architecture: The proposed residence has a modern style design theme, that includes a flat metal roof, vinyl siding on the west elevation, stucco finish, vinyl windows, metal and glass garage doors, and aluminum balcony railings. The architectural design of the residence incorporates a flat roof to decrease the potential loss off view from adjacent neighbors. The two-car garage is located underneath the northwestern portion of the second story of the residence,with the garage door facing west and accessed by a driveway with up to 2 percent grade. The building mass is visually broken up through the use of multiple wall plane changes and the incorporation of exterior decks along the south, east, and west elevation. The residence will be painted earth tone colors in compliance with Section 17.122.020.D.2 of the Hillside Development code. The proposed residence consists of two levels. The first level is approximately 2,544 square feet and consists of the main living area, garage, and two bedrooms. The second level is approximately 2,031 square feet and consists of the family loft area and three bedrooms. The second floor includes decks along the south, east, and west elevations. The proposed 4,040 square foot residence is compatible with other homes constructed near Alta Cuesta Drive, which range in size from 2,400 square feet to 4,896 square feet. Low Residential District Code Compliance: The project complies with the requirements of the Low (L) Residential District. The required development standards are as follows: Setbacks Development Requirements Proposed Front Yard 20' +/- 5' 25' Interior Side Yards 5' / 10' 10' / 23' Rear Yard 20' 26'-11" Lot Coverage 40% Max 24% Building Height 30' limit within the Hillside Overlay 24'-10" B. Design Committee Review: The project was presented to the Design Review Committee (Wimberly and Guglielmo) on August 20, 2019. The Design Review Committee accepted the design of the project as proposed without revisions and recommended that the project be moved forward to the Planning Commission for review (Exhibit C). C. Hillside Design Requirements and Code Compliance: The project complies with the intent of the Hillside Overlay District, which seeks to facilitate appropriate development of hillside areas. The project site is a downslope lot with an elevation change of approximately 5 feet from the west to the east property lines. The maximum height of the house is 24'-10" overall PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT HDR DRC2018-01014 — RAMY IBRAHIM October 23, 2019 Page 3 as measured from finished grade. Hillside Design Section 17.122.020.D.1.0 requires that houses in the Hillside Overlay District be designed to fit within a 30-foot-high building envelope. D. Grading: The proposed grading plan indicates there will be 40 cubic yards of cut and 520 cubic yards of fill from the project site. The project design requires 480 cubic yards of import, which is necessary to allow the construction of the driveway and foundation of the residence. The foundation of the residence is stepped with the existing grade, with the upper pad at an elevation of 1,450 feet. This is in conformance with Hillside Design Section 17.122.020.D.1.a., which requires terrace of building pads to follow the slope. E. View Analysis: The Development Code does not include a requirement to preserve views. However, the applicant has increased the side yard setback to the south to avoid the appearance of overbuilding or crowding the lot and to minimize view obstructions. F. Building Envelope Analysis: Hillside Design Section 17.122.020.D.1.e requires that residences in the Hillside Overlay District be designed to fit within a 30-foot high building envelope. The applicant has provided two north-south and two east-west cross-sections with building envelopes demonstrating compliance with the 30-foot height requirement. G. Retaining and Perimeter Walls: The maximum permitted retaining wall height is 4 feet within the Hillside Overlay District per Section 17.12.020, with stepped retaining walls permitted to have a maximum height of 3 feet with a minimum 3 foot separation between the stepped walls. The applicant is proposing 4-foot maximum retaining walls around the concrete patio to the east and west of the subject site. No retaining walls are proposed in excess of 4 feet and a minimum 3-foot separation is proposed between the stepped retaining wall. The applicant is also proposing to install 5 foot high perimeter walls along the north, south and east property lines. The north property line already has a perimeter wall in place and will remain. H. Landscape: The proposed front yard landscaping is designed to comply with Hillside Development Section 17.122.020.F., which requires new development to include the use of drought-tolerant landscaping to protect slopes from erosion and planting shrubs to soften the views of the downslope elevations. The proposed front landscaping complies with the front yard landscape requirements, by minimizing hardscape to less than 50 percent of the front yard area. The proposed front yard landscaping also meets the criteria of the State Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (MWELO) and does not exceed the maximum applied water allowance (MAWA) as required by Section 17.82.020. All vegetation will be designed and installed in accordance to the guidelines from the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (RCFPD) for sites located in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone (VHFHSZ) and in the designated Wildland-Urban Interface Fire Area. I. Environmental Assessment: The Planning Department staff has determined that the project is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines.The project qualifies as a Class 3 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15303 — New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures. Section 15303 allows for the construction of a single-family residence in a residential zone. The proposed project is a single-family residence on a single lot within the Low (L) Residential District and Hillside Overlay District. The residence meets all applicable development PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT HDR DRC2018-01014 — RAMY IBRAHIM October 23, 2019 Page 4 standards and zoning regulations of the Development Code. Therefore, staff finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. J. Public Art: This project is exempt from providing public art as outlined in Chapter 17.124 of the Development Code. The proposed project is a single-family residence. Residential projects with a density equal to or less than four dwelling units per acre are exempt from the public art requirement. FISCAL IMPACT: The project site currently is assessed an annual property tax. A percentage of this annual tax is shared with the City. The proposed development will increase the value of the project site and the City's annual share of the property tax will increase accordingly. The project proponent also will be responsible for paying one-time impact fees. These fees are intended to address the increased demand for City services due to the proposed project. The following types of services that these impact fees would support include the following: library services, transportation infrastructure, drainage infrastructure, animal services, police, parks, and community and recreation services. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: Although a specific current City Council goal does not apply to the project, the project is consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan and the objectives of the Development Code. The Land Use element within the General Plan (Chapter 2) encourages infill development that facilitates sustainable and attractive development that complements the surrounding neighborhood. The proposed single-family residence is of similar scale and size to that of the surrounding neighborhood, and the land use and lot dimensions are in compliance with the Development Code. The contemporary design of the residence complements the eclectic architectural styles in the neighborhood. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing with a regular legal advertisement in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. No comments were received in response to these notifications. EXHIBITS: Exhibit A - Site Aerial Exhibit B - Architectural and Grading Plans Exhibit C - Design Review Committee Action Comments (August 20, 2019) Draft Resolution 19-64 Recommending Approval of Hillside Design Review DRC2018-01014 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT HDR DRC2018-01014 — RAMY IBRAHIM October 23, 2019 Page 5 SITE AERIAL -•�� Subject Site lot EXHIBIT A w Project Information Proposed Two Story Single Family House For. tV OWNER: KEVIN &LIZETE MASHKOTIAZAD Mashkoti*azad PROJECT ADDRESS: VISTA DRKavianLi*zetteRANCHO CUCAMONG A, CA 91730 +-> o n CONTACT KEVI N w ® ® 7563 Alta Cuesta Dr, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 7563)ALLTA CUESTA DR ARTOO DESIGN S2DI0, INC. ARCHITECTURE O - �r- RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 + E N G I N E E R I N G Q sAll KEVINAZAD 1 @GMAIL.COM z U _ RAMY IBRAHIM o d _ EXISTING 255 SQ. FT. ARCHITECT, LEED AP BD+C - STORAGE ACCESSOY Building Data ramartoo@yahoo.com r== BUILDING TO BE DEMO I EXISTING 2 STORY 1 714.707.1 14 � - N SINGLE FAMILY APN: 0207044290000 ~_ L- HOUSE 1 7039 VILLAGE DR. L PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION TRACT NO 2573 BOOK 38 LOT#18 EASTVALE, CA 92880 3 � U CQ EXISTINGBRIDGE TO ZONING: RES � � � BE REMOVED www.ads2dio.Com t� OCCUPANCY: R-3 z +' _ PROPOSED 5' HT. 1 CONSTRUCTION: V-B w Q - - 6" BLOCK WALL FIRE SPRINKLERS: REQUIRED (UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT)THE BUILDING SHALL BE _ ' - FROM GRADE LVL I EQUIPPED WITH AUTOMATIC RESIDENTIAL FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM IN ~ M _ ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION R313.3 OR NFPA13D. (R313,12.21A17(d)) z � _ 106.58, BUILDING HT 23'-9" Q _ PROJECT DESCRIPTION: NEW TWO STORY 4,040 SQ FT SINGLE FAMILY HOUSE AND 435 SQ FT a, •` ATTACHED GARAGE o mPROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 18 OF TRACT 2573,AS RECORDED IN MAP BOOK 38 PAGES 44&45 n� -1--- ----------- = — — — w Document Number Agency Index C\1 CO CD C.0 cc 7— - 0 j— _ _ LOT 18OF TRACT25a AS RECORDED ,��GRVE7'11�+ TES: � MAP BOOK 30 PAGES 44 4 45 ----- , a - -6-0" _ M p µ" �$4y � � dV�I IMkrG _ _ O � N �- ;— 1 � Fauwa ,uuEr,r,►s)J0rED - - 2:1 SLOPE PER GRADING PLJ,N ' 1 - - FDUMD T4'1RON RPE w�rc�ar r,�l rwa -- - �, 1 r ATu4L REFEi�Ei�C WTN NAIL 4 rAG,SEI CO z µE7 WIDrdR STA riloy 1 _ SIUIRVEY.DN 6'PER 'EMPP' o R2FRI . _ d - - 1 O S V - _ _ �aISTANc��i��i z 1/4 SLOPE I � � N 0 -: ,:,_. :. I =_ - _ UNCOVERED PATIO S.F.N., _' _ R2 ICRt�1 1M 0 Q ffOL5T,4N17J1 RE 90PERA'2 to � . ,•`. ;� '� -� AREA FU NAA!8 TAG N.S. d LS 471E IN CONCiRTE = WALL FC�Tii�IG PER R2F hl hld}rNAvG FQYIND NGTI�Y1Ya O O 2 r E w UP 1 NAP NOTA PARTOF SURVEY > a S SLOPE 1 q U U 5'-0" VERTICAL HATCH TO SHOW ►� r 0 � o (632 SQ FT ) UNCOVERED A LL 4-- O z SIDE SB .N f6 TERACCES - - V � �I General Notes r 1 � I Lilt 1 '' , r" N 0 PROPOSED o -0 SEr NAIL AND TAG � � N4 1z' N .� •� C Q Number Note I ,040 SQ F � LS 9J20,W EPDXY A T I T � N J i 3 d &WALL + Cl) _ T01°OF BLOCK ]� z T � o TWO STORY o � � o s,ET By PF�OPoR-n '1. 1 LUMBER SHALL BE GRADE STAMPED AND CONFORM TO THE FOLLOWING MINIMUM STANDARDS: SINGLE FAMILY 10'-0" 0 C)6 Q A)STRUCTURAL LUMBER TO BE WEST COAST DOUG FIR NO. 2 OR BETTER (UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE)THIS INCLUDES BEAMS, HEADERS, HOUSE N N O BLOCKING, DIAGONALBRACES, PLATFORMS, STRINGERS, JOISTS, RAFTERS AND POSTS. (BEAMS 4 x 12 AND LARGER TO BE DOUG FIR#1 & 10'-0" r3 BTR.) MULCH COVER a 5 �� ' 4'� 11 0 o a _ F d B)STUDS MAY BE "CONSTRUCTION GRADE" DOUGLAS FIR OR#1 & BETTER. SIDE SB ' -P C)TOP PLATES MAY BE "CONSTRUCTION GRADE" HEM FIR OR DOUGLAS FIR. ANGLE.-00'1,--'. Q D)SILL PLATES IN CONTACT WITH CONCRETE SHALL BE PRESSURE TREATED"WOLMANIZED"OR FOUNDATION GRADE REDWOOD (435 SQ FT 1uOT 8C4iCF 0 z ATTACHED (600 SQ FT ) PERMABLE FD NAB T,iGZg§�f • } 2 STRUCTURAL CONNECTOR REFERENCES ARE TO"SIMPSON STRONG-TIE"CONNECTORS. I.C.C.APPROVED vQ 0 Q z M GARAGE CONIC UNCOVERED PATIO WCONC4ETEF OTWG to ' 3 NO STRUCTURAL MEMBER SHALL BE SERIOUSLY WEAKENED OR IMPAIRED BY CUTTING OR NOTCHING - OF�rt;,�c�VACI RE1�E> N O M Ln 4 CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA MODIFIED VERSION (TITLE 24, 2013 EDITION)OF THE TRASH BIN AREA ° ° % i I � � � � � FOLLOWING CODES: 1/4"SL t ,4 CIEPTED ASPJ PIER Y' 7 0 0 2013 CALIFORNIA RESIDENTIAL CODE, (2012 IRC) OPE off` RESET NAtL AND TAG LS9320 JN L LO r� 2013 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE, (2012 UPC) �— �' SAME o > 2013 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE, (2012 UMC) � � 2013 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE (2011 NEC) 5' HT. 6" BLOCK WALL A e ° o PROPOSED 5' HT. 6" " Q TITLE 24 35'-0 �{ BLOCK WALL FROM O ALL OTHER APPLICABLE LAWS AND REGULATIONS �� GRADE LVL 24.918' qr FV 111-LRON�P1hPF�4 H 5 DRAINAGE PIPING IN THE GROUND SHALL BE LAID ON A FIRM BED FOR ITS ENTIRE LENGTH AND BACKFILLED IN THIN LAYERS TO 12"ABOVE W w W �� 9I PILATICIJ ��� QUEEN VIXTORIA y - �T94fi1EE1V ,4 'IED - 01) TOP OF PIPE WITH CLEAN EARTH, FREE FROM STONES AND BOULDERS. DRAIN PIPE SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 3"DIAMETER WITH 2% MIN. AGAVE W W o 100 SQ FT COVERED ENTRY W w w SLOPE. � � w 9: 5 / PORCH ) w w 10'-0" � 6 OFFSET PLUMBING OUT OF BEARING FOOTINGS. , ' ;,, �� w A,$PROPERTY rho 12 -6 a a 16 -0 - F 4 GROIN AI"PF TAD O 7 FIXTURES, DEVICES AND EQUIPMENT SHALL COMPLY WITH APPLICABLE CEC REGULATIONS. Q'- ° W W WW W 4 BELGARD- BERGERAC No REFERENCE,ATE� -,-, W w W oW MODULAR PERMEABLE 0-1 8 THE MANUFACTURED WINDOWS SHALL HAVE A LABEL ATTACHED CERTIFIED BY THE NATIONAL FENESTRATION RATING COUNCIL(NFRC) W W W W w w w v w W W w W w W w W W w W W W w\ W PAVEMENT SYSTEM AS FR CORNER, �E-r SAStS OF SEAR � S. o AND SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS. VARIEGATED > { CARRIBEAN - -W-= - - �W - - - = - - - W- - - - - - - NAI'L+�TAGLSUM 9 APPROVAL OF THESE PLANS BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT DOES NOT INCLUDE APPROVAL FOR ANY TYPE OF ALARM SYSTEM THAT MAY o 8-0,,, b w m THE BF-49N�GS&KAMASR 'AREPSER W THEC&IIFOR,�ra o O BE SHOWN OR REQUIRED. SEPARATE APPROVALS FOR ANY ALARM SYSTEMS MUST BE OBTAINED. AGAVE a a� N �� O PROPOSED NATIVE �X� kl4 r$ r r' u�I' € CrL f z 10 ALL STEEL REINFORCEMENT TO COMPLY WITH ASTM-615, GRADE 40 AND 60 O � - F�,0 Yd N PARE S'F'N-' Gdur iV'+v+�P4 u CflfIES � � � DC C MULCH OR� � U : COVE S AdL►7� 91D8ErYfY1i NGS�I�AE6G4iE0 Z(]C4Lt.Yth°F,4Et�? gw�F[I TIES 13 SURFACE WATER WILL DRAIN AWAY FROM BUILDING,AND THE GRADE SHALL FALL A MINIMUM OF 6"WITHIN THE FIRST 10'. SECTION401.3. PROPOSED NATIVE W �W W W W y W W O W W W W W W�NA&&TAB CO TO Me °'�" 'W �� � z_ y y -- -- _ - M .° _ . . W .� .� W ' CLJ W w = W W W W W W SURYFY, ON 6.PI ALL D15TANM','SMDft HEREON N?IE Mu YEW's OF THE bS�+:RVCY fti-,. � � J TREES w W w W .W w o w Q v W w w W w W w w W R2 ALL NSTANC1:S NNEREOt�CIROL M[] PALACES a W W a a U_ W W • �1 y w � N O - -- �/ Green Building Standards: W w m W o) VJ - 95.00' W - [3GELSG•206 Q 30" HT. 6" BLOCK WALL _ o z o 30" HT. 6" BLOCK WALL 1. STORM WATER DRAINAGE/RETENTION DURING CONSTRUCTION: PROJECTS WHICH DISTURB LESS THAN ONE ACRE OF SOIL SHALL MANAGE O 75 STORM WATER DRAINAGE DURING CONSTRUCTION BY ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: I 0 3 V O A) RETENTION BASINS. Upland Hills p Q w O B) WHERE STORM WATER IS CONVEYED TO A PUBLIC DRAINAGE SYSTEM, WATER SHALL BE FILTERED BY USE OF A BARRIER SYSTEM, EXISTING 30" HT. FRONT Country Club _P WATTLE OR OTHER APPROVED METHOD. WALL AND GATES TO BE E Gtlr St Base Line Rd z 2. GRADING AND PAVING: THE SIDE GRADING OR DRAINAGE SYSTEM WILL MANAGE ALL SURFACE WATER FLOWSTO KEEP WATER FROM REMOVED o d ENTERING BUILDINGS (SWALES, WATER COLLECTION, FRENCH DRAINSETC.) — S O 3. INDOOR WATER USE SHALL COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING TABLE cNJ FIXTURE FLOW RATES: ° o FIXTURE TYPE MAXIMUM FLOW RATE 00 ~_ O o WATER CLOSETS 1.28GPF E15thSt � o SHOWERHEADS 2GPM @ 60 PSI Red Hill Park o LAVATORY FAUCETS 1.5 GPM @ 60 PSI lip CIL- o KITCHEN FAUCETS 1.8 GPM @ 60 PSI ALTA C U ESTA D R■ o METERING FAUCETS 0.25 GALLONS PER CYCLE _ 7563 Alta Guests Drive Cflrtdlewao w � 4� 31 min c;ivt-borne � I o LAVATORY FAUCETS SHALL NOT HAVE A FLOW RATE LESS THAN 0.8 GPM @ 20PS1 170910 4. LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION WATER USE SHALL HAVE EITHER WEATHER OR SOIL BASED CONTROLLERS _ E74th5i �� z { a 5. RECYCLING: MIN OF 50 /o OF CONSTRUCTION WASTE IS TO BE RECYCLED Plan 7 p d 6. RECYCLING: CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT A CONSTRUCTION WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN TO TIJURISDICTION AGENCY THAT REGULATES Site mJ� O1 MAR 2019 _WASTE MANAGEMENT.CD1 rr = 10r-Orr � - � � r� � �� �o q 7. OPERATION AND MAINTAINANCE MANUAL: THE BUILDER IS TO PROVIDE AN OPERATION MANUAL (CONTAINING INFO FOR MAINTAINING APPLIANCES, ETC.) FOR THE OWNER AT THE TIME OF FINAL INSPECTION. ok 3 8. POLLUTANT CONTROL: DURING CONSTRUCTION, ENDS OF DUCT OPENINGS ARE TO BE SEALED,AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT IS TO BE - E 13th S1 t z COVERED. Se Sequence O Drawin s P. 0Red Hill Count Club o 9. POLLUTANT CONTROL: VOC'S MUST COMPLY WITH THE LIMITATIONLISTED IN SECTION 4.504.3 AND TAB4.504.2, 4.504.3 AND 4.504.5 FOR AREA ANALYSIS: BUILDING STATICS: 9 f g 3 € c �a �o ADHESIVES, PAINTS AND COATINGS, CARPET AND COMPOSITION WOO[PRODUCTS. 1ST FLOOR: LIVING AREA 2,009 SF San Bernord 10. INTERIOR MOISTURE CONTROL: THE MOISTURE CONTENT OF WOOD SHALL NOT EXCEED 19% BEFORE IT IS ENCLOSED IN CONSTRUCTION. SITE STATICS: GARAGE 435 SF # Description n 4 THE MOISTURE CONTENT NEEDS TO BE CERTIFIED BY ONE OF 3 METHODS SPECIFIED IN SECTION 1.505.3. BUILDING MATERIALVISIBLE ENTRY PORCH 100 SF S SIGNS OF WATER DAMAGE SHOULD NOT BE USED IN CONSTRUCTION. THE MOISTURE CONTENT MUST BE DETERMINE[CONTRACTOR BY ONE OF TOTAL LOT AREA: 10,411 SF UNCOVERED PATIO 600 SF A-1 Site Plan E Foothill Blvd THE METHODS LISTED IN CGC 4.505.3 BLDG FOOTPRINT EFoothill Blvd C. AR �7 12. INDOOR AIR QUALITY: BATHROOM FANS SHALL BE ENERGY STAR RATED,VENTED DIRECTLY TO THE OUTSIDE AND CONTROLLED BY A 2,009+ 435+100 2,544 SF 2ND FLOOR: LIVING AREA 2,031 A-2 Floor Plans&Schedules y{Sf < Ow1s � IBRAq rljJ� HUMIDISTAT. UNCOVERED TERRACES 632 SF A-3 Floor Plans&Schedules 3 a Rr�ss 2: 13. PRIOR TO FINAL INSPECTION THE LICENSED CONTRACTOR, ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE OF O'CONSTRUCTION LOT COVERAGE 24.45 % A-4 Elevations n �' � 0- MUST PROVIDE TO THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT OFFICIAL WRITTEN VERIFICATION THAT ALL APPLICABLE PROVISIONS FROM THE GREEN BUILDING A-5 Elevations d °R ro STANDARDS CODE HAVE BEEN IMPLEMENTED AS PART OF THE CONSTRUCTION. FRONT YARD LANDSCAPE/ HARDSCAPE TOTAL LIVING SPACES 4,040 SF No.C 37222 TOTAL FRONT YEARD AREA 2,550 SF 100% TOTAL PATIOS &TERRACES 1,232 A-6 Sections �s T `n� Ren.09/30/19 ti`� 01 �,�� CIL- DRIVEWAY 480 SF A-7 Roof Plan&3D Views our �, 9�� O�� _J PERMEABLE PAVEMENT 200 SF 26%<50% aY�1°{55 OF CALX (-) LANDSCAPE 640 SF 26%>25% IS Topo Survey w MULCH OR DC COVER 1,230 SF 48%<50% NOT VAILD WITHOUT WET SIGNATURE S ■ Vicinity Map lit = 10r—Orr = c1 I I Am 1 �9 1�1 >_ Q w • • U Q 0 A B C D E F GZV 10'-0" 56'-4" P9 5'-0" 16-0" 24'-8" 10'-8" Q I • o Q z II o o ARTOO DESIGN S2DIO, INC. II ARCHITECTURE 0 1 + E N G I N E E R I N G z Q RAMY IBRAHIM d ARCHITECT, LEED AP BD+C o❑ ramartoo@yahoo.com 5040 714.707.1114 d w VILAGE DR. BATH EASOTVALEL CA 9 880 3 _ 44 SF _ U o� BEDROOM #1 N `° www.ads2dio.com - ❑ 213 SF r d o x _ ' Q T P3070 m z z Ln 3040FECD 5030 Q r` � 0 0 > 2IL P307o (0 T �[ N= CV o OD _ O co QQ� co co 3 CD zo II - �0 N o / 5040 BEDROOM #2 O _p 146 SF > 00 4'-2" 8'-0" 12'-6" P3070 O Q d N 13' 2" 2'-10" 6-0 1/4" N O S U @ o Z4 L.L o CID ° Q O 00 r ° o to w ° O GV U 9'-0" _ T-0" O 01 -1 _ E U P3070 V 4 w '� � v Q L o ❑ z B o - - 2' " 4'� 22'-11" o_ Q A-6LID BATH 0 � 45 SF o LAUNDRY N i 3 38 SF T Q o L z 5 d O 06 z U) N tn 01 Q d FAMILY/ LIVING/ DINING 3 _p 1323 SF U o � I aN z Lno " O M r` T o _ o CL r GV C0 O '^ o / I L.V w 35'-4" P3070 z O� - GARAGE; 0 399 SF 01) O o i I O O CD L—A O -1 06 _ o w o \ UP Q o PWDR 75 45 SF -2" v Q CU \ 5040 CIL- L-A 21'-0" q 5'-8" 4'-0"0 4'-0" w _ O - - % /// I LI d 0 8T 11771 - - - o CIL- -,- CU 2.050 2050 5040 10'-0" 1'-10" 8" 8V_0` 8" 1'-10" 13' 8" 21' 8" � ILI Q� 170910 O1 MAR 2019 �_ / 2 0 Q 2\ 10 Jan. 0 17 3 ❑ z 0 o c� 1st Floor Floor Plan - Proposed AR 114" 1'-0" ��15 .� I BRA�r = No.C 37222 `n� Ren.09/30/19CIL- w 0 w NOT VAILD WITHOUT WET SIGNATURE _ c� O Cu Ln (Y) Q ry U w • • U Q 0 A B C D A E F GtV P9 o Q z_ o ARTOO DESIGN S2DIO, INC. o ARCHITECTURE 0 1 + ENGINEERING z 0 RAMY IBRAHIM z ARCHITECT, LEED AP BD+C I ramartoo@yahoo.com d 714.707.1114 z n-p 7039 VILLAGE DR. W T 24'-0° EASTVALE, CA 92880 c� www.ads2dio.com w -p T UNCOVERED BALCONY w Q m z z I 2 Y 10080 4 PANEL SLIDER CD I o� o T-0" 14'-0" 24'-8" 10'-8" 3 o ' 5040I Hill - UNCOVERED BALCONY o BATH Ll- CU 42 SF M o ' T >00000 T BEDROOM #5 10080 4 PANEL SLIDER 181 SF UNCOVERED BALCON O V 3040 [KE) I N 5040 � j w d ' _ E v � 0 r w V •= w 0 A E U �_ `F o ' — — — — — — — — — — 10080 4 PANEL SLIDER L.L 0 z d � II II N 7 �I B o W.I.C. W.I.C. w Q A-6 00 zo 57 SF 57 SF o •� ~_ N � i 3 — — — — — — — — — l i w 5 I ° 0 z c� o LOFT/ FAMILY 2' BEDROOM #3 0 FO r 732 SF 202 SF d M O � a 15'-6 3/4" • } Q 3040 0 CV) N � BEDROOM #4 O LO o I r z I T O O r U I BATH Ji 6 U 0 I w o w_ o ° 7-0" 14'-0" 19'-9 1/2" 6'-3 1/4" 9'-3 1/4" o 01 6 o ' 10080 4 PANEL SLIDER UP BATH 075 76 SF Q C'u UNCOVERED BALCONY w 75 7 V w O V) w ' Ln U. d UNCOVERED BALCONY = o I IN IN 0 1 QJ 170910 cd 01 MAR 2019 CD 3 Q � Q z 0 o c� 2nd Floor Plan - Proposed ARC > 114 1 0 tsR rr1�rr - r rr w N � No.C 37222 `n� Ren.09/30/19 ��Q 01 w U 0 w NOT VAILD WITHOUT WET SIGNATURE _ c o Cu m z Q ry w • • U Q 0 A B -C- - - - - - - _ _ _ D A E F G 4->n — / — � z 8 5 1 5 3 ARTOO DESIGN S2D10, INC. o ARCHITECTURE o c / `� + E N G I N E E R I N G � r /� RAMY IBRAHIM o c ARCHITECT, LEED AP BD+C i T.P. 2 ramartoo@yahoo.com 19' - 2" 714.707.1114 / \ _ 7039 VILLAGE DR. 0) 4So i � EASTVALE, CA 92880 3 u 00 oe ❑ ❑ T www.ads2dio.com w +, / T O O i r U U Q M M 00 m �5o z `Dn in n IN I A101Mo z 5' 0" Q I\I N PL o >_ I 2ND LEVEL P_ f10' - 1 if I a � T.P. 1 = CD 10'-0° m � I CD10 :]E:7 N o I I PEN O = M _p � j 10'-0" Q 0 Elevation Material Le emend ii 0 / r �� 1. P 2090 1 st THUNDER SKY I ' LLB U Floo0 2. P-100- GLACIER WHITEr N 3. P-1661 -TITANIUM Grade 4 -6„ _ E _ d 4. VINYL WINDOWS g 7 2 1 C4� 8 5 2 3 4 r U 5. ENTRY DOOR (SEE MATERIL BOARD SAMPLE) 0 U 6. BALCONY ALUMINUM RAILING ( ) 7. GARAGE DOOR (SEE MATERIAL BOARD) V S 8. LIGHT FIXTURE (SEE MATERIAL BOARD) D OF U C3 w00000�_ Q� LL � 0 o z �I Front - West Elevation N Q 114" = 1'-0" N d _ T i 3 i B 0 z U A6 N 06 0 d V _o `D 0 M w U-) O 0 I _ — — — — — — — — — LO 9 8 3 1 - - - - - — Q o — — — — — I 0� / o / ` o \ Q, / CD L—A Ul in � o O i U T.P � // \ q Ut ` r / 8 \ / � \ m 4 �\ Q o \ 75 A o> co6 1 \ L , O I \ w U _ I11 IT— 11111 Hill _p 11111 Hill11111 Hill d ~_ 13' o° 0 2ND LEVEL 10' - 1" 01 CDU T.P. 1 CU � ] o I 01 9' _ 1 a n� CL- 0D I U � I T I 25-0" \ 170910 cd I CDO1 MAR 2019 ] o = Q 20'-0" Q 1 st Floor Grade -6" ARC U �c�1S •� IBR,q�,rr�� N No.C 37222 Ren.09/30/19 �ti`� 01 OF w CAti���4 U o U NOT VAILD WITHOUT WET SIGNATURE _ c� CD Side - South Elevation 1/4" = 1'-0" A=4 Ln _ w • • U Q tV Q P9 Q • G F E A 6 D _ _ — — — — — (�- ~ ~ ~ B A O ARTOO DESIGN S2DIO, INC. o ARCHITECTURE o _ _ -- - -- \ + E N G I N E E R I N G RAMY IBRAHIM o d _ \\ ARCHITECT, LEED AP BD+C /� ramartoo@yahoo.com d i \ 714.707.1114 // o 7039 VILLAGE DR. r EASTVALE, CA 92880 U / www.ads2dio.com T.P. 2 x +' // \ 19' - 2" U T LF) > 4So 4 rn 6 5' 0" 0 > N i — — — — 2ND— — — LEVEL 0 3 10' - 1" O = cn IF- _p 10'-0"> c z CT U _ II � 4 Jc V I Elevation Material L end I II O 0 u o r E _ r II >1 a 17 O 1. P-2090-THUNDER SKY U s 2. P-100-GLACIER WHITE 1 st FlooOr-OILE 4 U = U 3. P-1661 -TITANIUM 0 4. VINYL WINDOWS Grade LL_ 0 _`+a N d 5. ENTRY DOOR(SEE MATERIL BOARD SAMPLE) U 6. BALCONY ALUMINUM RAILING u 7. GARAGE DOOR (SEE MATERIAL BOARD) Q 8. LIGHT FIXTURE (SEE MATERIAL BOARD) 0 d N J T i 3 i 0 06 z_ V) N z Rear - East. Elevation 0 D `D 0 M w U-) O � �_ 1 2 3 4Lo A6 _5_ - - - - - - - - - - - 6 7 \` 8 9 - - - CD 01) Q w o O / 1 \ r O / z Q� T.P. 2 / 19' - 211 •O IOU CIL- 75 / V / 8 ' �n // 1 4 175 P, �cl) 6 O 11 L O 11 1111 A _ Q z d = 13'-0" CD III] r 2ND LEVEL t 10' 1" �I Ln U CD I - i L TP. 1 91 - 1 � Io = _ Q� qEo 4 T II 170910 cd 01 MAR 2019 CD 9 II o 20'-0" I A Q 1st Floor � LH Grade _Gn = V w rIr�'� ARBR,ql,,r���� U No.C 37222 `n� Ren.09/30/19CIL- w OF C4ti��04 U o U Side - North Elevation NOT VAILD WITHOUT WET SIGNATURE _ o 11411 1 4rr = 1'-0" cu Q 1 1 1 1 • � - 1 1 • • • ► - • ► • • � 1 1 ' 1 - • - • 1 ' • • • • • • 1 1 ' 1 - • - • ' • • � • 1 1 ■ II . �i2iiiiiiiiiiii•�•i•�•i•�•i•�•iii!ii ® 1 1 ----------- - - - --- -- a DOMINION iD®iD®iD®iD®iD®iD®i M������ ® MCI-------- — — rawIIIIIIII - - I-I -- — —���rp��1��i���?���10®Off?eijyi�rVY11Ar1�i':�7�®�P��1�•�I�Q��,'�'frA��n����•�1�Ia0�����— — ® 0 `►= .►i!iA!iA!iA!iA!iA!iA!iAliA!iA!iA!iA!iA! ■ ►�i -...... ITIM ® ® ® ® I�r. ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® I1111111 - - - ■ � �� 10 milli i!�i!A�O�i�l��♦4���1� �i�s�i�6�?�i�!���!�i�.i�i■��b®A�i�m$®/lei ��i�i�����r��1A •i tp:'.���.%•,.� .l�w. • Proposed Two Story Single Family House For: > • i ' 1 1 1 1 — i i i 1 1 ■ 1 1 - • r . ► ► ► ► ~ C ' Kavian • - - � Lizette Mashkotiazad • �• �• • _ - r1j O � O • •• '� ,'� �• •• 1 1 1' I 1 "1' �' 1 1 I "11 I 11' 1' I 1' 1' 1 1' �• I I 1 'I •�• 1 11 •• 1 I 1 1 '� I'� �' 3/5/2019 10:43:35 AM D:\0,ramy_dell_2015\0,artoo desigm s2dio_jobs\2017-09-10_Kevin_7563 Alta Cuesta Dr-Rancho Cucamonga\Revit\20170910_Kevin_7563 Alta Cuesta-Rancho - Opt 0 (0 00 _ = O Mow won � O o D I � I I W I , I I I I I ' �.I f CAR IJL II II II - I II III I •• I I I I I I I I I I I •- - li li I •- •• j S * L DDDD o N r2 > D Proposed Two StorySingle FamilyHouse For: D o Q D � O _ M d Roof Plan & 3D r < N o Kavian & Lizette Mashkotiazad Q Drn W rn rn z • Views -0M 0 > > � � N N V n O��I 3yti 0 0 � 0 wxZCO • • 7563 Alta Cuesta Dr, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Co . E n rn Z n RAMP IBRAHIH, ARCHITECT EXPRESSLY RESERVES HIS CU 0 LAW COPYRIGHT AND ETHER PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS THESE PLANS ARE NOT TE BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED ER COPIED IN ANY FERN ER MANNER WHATSOEVER, NOR ARE THEY TG BE ASSIGNED TE ANY THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING THE EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT EF RAMP IBRAHIH, ARCHITECT. CITY GENERAL GRADING NOTES: A. GRADING PROCESS CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 210 1. A GRADING PERMIT SHALL BE OBTAINED FROM THE CITY AND THE GRADING INSPECTOR SHALL BE NOTIFIED 24 HOURS PRIOR TO THE START OF ANY GRADING. 2. CLEARING AND GRUBBING, INCLUDING REMOVAL OF EXISTING STRUCTURE, FOOTINGS, FOUNDATIONS, RUBBLE, TREES AND ROOT SYSTEMS, OTHER VEGETATION, DEBRIS, ETC., SHALL BE COMPLETED TO GRADING z THE SATISFACTION OF THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER PRIOR TO THE START OF GRADING OPERATIONS. w CONCEPTUAL PLAN 3. EXCAVATION SHALL THEN BE COMPLETED AS SHOWN ON THE APPROVED PLANS. U 4. IF EXPORTING 50 CUBIC YARDS OR MORE OF SOIL, THE APPLICANT SHALL PROVIDE THE LOCATION WHERE THE SOIL IS TO BE DEPOSITED ALONG WITH A LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE FORM THE 7 ALTA CUESTA TA DRIVE APN 2 7- ��-� PROPERTY OWNER PRIOR TO GRADING PLAN APPROVAL. IF THE SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, A STOCKPILE PLAN AND PERMIT ARE REQUIRED. 563 C U V O 0 O g 15 5. THE EXPOSED SOILS SHALL THEN BE INSPECTED BY THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. ADDITIONAL OVER EXCAVATION SHALL BE MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER'S RECOMMENDATION AND AS CONTAINED IN THE SOILS REPORT. SEE BELOW )LU 6 THE DETERMINED BY APLS PENDIX XLL THEN SECTIONBJ107C5ROFED TO A TTHELATEST I ICALIFORN CALIFORNIA OF 6 BUILDINGINCHES, CODE. EQUIVALENT O PROPER COMPACTIONSTURE CONTENT AND CAN BE OBTAINED BYCMETH METHODS SPECIFIED O AT LBYSTHEOGEOTECHNICAL EIMUM ENGINEER.NSITY, AS APN 0207-044-14 Q VICINITY MAP \ �7. PRIOR TO IMPORTING SOIL, THE GRADING CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER NOT LESS THAN 72 HOURS IN ADVANCE, SO THAT EACH PROPOSED IMPORT SOURCE CAN BE Q N.T.S. SAMPLED, TESTED, AND APPROVED PRIOR TO DELIVERY FOR USE ON THE SITE. w �20"E 74.08' z 8. PROPER COMPACTION FOR THE ENTIRE PROJECT INCLUDING THE BACKFILL OF UTILITY TRENCHES, ETC. SHALL BE VERIFIED BY THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. HE SHALL PREPARE A COMPACTION _ REPORT, WHICH SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO AND APPROVED BY THE CITY PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT. / - O ` -044-07 9. PAD CERTIFICATION FOR ELEVATION OF ALL PADS WITHIN THE PROJECT SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE BUILDING INSPECTOR PRIOR TO ANY CONCRETE POURING. PAD CERTIFICATION CAN BE BY EITHER W :. -r APN 0207 10 ONE APPROVED BLACK-LINE-AS-BUILT GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN OR IN LETTER FORMAT SHOWING THE DESIGN AND AS-BUILT PAD ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THE APPROVED GRADING AND - _ 7 / ill DRAINAGE PLAN. EITHER SHALL BE SEALED BY A CIVIL ENGINEER LICENSED IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. /may / • / � � / / 10. CERTIFICATES OF FINAL LOT GRADING ARE TO BE SUBMITTED THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION. 11. FINAL APPROVAL INCLUDES THE CONSTRUCTION OF ALL IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE APPROVED PLAN, INCLUDING DRAINAGE FACILITIES, DRAINAGE PATTERNS, WALLS, CURBS, ASPHALT PAVEMENT, BUILDINGS, ETC. ALL ITEMS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED TO THE LINE AND GRADE SHOWN ON THE APPROVED PLANS. 12. AN AS-GRADED GRADING PLAN AND CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO RELEASE OF GRADING BOND AND PRIOR TO FINAL m �� GRADING INSPECTION. THE PERMITTEE SHALL PROVIDE A COPY OF AS-BUILT PLANS TO THE CITY FOR A PERMANENT RECORD AT THE END OF THE APPROVED GRADING WORK. ''^^ v, T T T 1 13. A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY C OF 0 AND OR FINAL ELECTRICAL CLEARANCE FOR ANY BUILDING WILL NOT BE RELEASED UNTIL ALL GRADING Lu DRAINAGE WQMP WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT T . ' 'J.• CLL DEL PRADO PLAN) BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES) IMPROVEMENTS ARE COMPLETED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY. IN ADDITION, THE ENGINEER'S AS-BUILT CERTIFICATE MUST BE WET SIGNED AND SEALED ON THE ../ WQMP BMP EXHIBIT. THREE SETS OF EXHIBITS MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY ENGINEER, OR DESIGNEE, FOR REVIEW. THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA WILL SUBMIT ONE ORIGINAL TO THE STATE l m I ��� APN 0 44- 9 WATER BOARD AND WILL SUBMIT A SECOND SET TO THE WEST VALLEY MOSQUITO AND VECTOR CONTROL DISTRICT. � ° o n / i / /°�" z i a � � i �" / o� 5 Cn B. RELATED REQUIREMENTS: o w w 2 z 1. THE CITY ONLY APPROVES THE ENGINEERING DESIGN IN SCOPE AND NOT IN DETAIL ON THESE PLANS. THE CITY DOES NOT VERIFY CONSTRUCTION QUANTITIES ON THESE PLANS. APPROVAL OF THE � ( x � Q SMH PLANS ARE FOR PERMIT PURPOSES ONLY AND SHALL NOT PREVENT THE CITY FORM REQUIRING CORRECTION OF ERRORS IN THE PLANS WHERE SUCH ERRORS ARE SUBSEQUENTLY FOUND TO BE IN o ' ��b �� P,_ J n) U VIOLATION OF ANY LAW, ORDINANCE, HEALTH, SAFETY, OR OTHER DESIGN ISSUES. CITY ACCEPTANCE OF PLANS DOES NOT RELIEVE THE DEVELOPER FROM RESPONSIBILITIES FROM THE CORRECTION OF ERRORS AND OMISSIONS DISCOVERED DURING CONSTRUCTION. x m \ 1 V °. z 2. ALL CONCRETE (PCC) WATER CARRYING DEVICES WITH SLOPES LESS THAN 0.5% SHALL BE WATER TESTED PRIOR TO FINAL INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE. ANY RESIDUAL PONDING IN EVIDENCE AT 'a APN 0207-044-30 TIME OF INSPECTION SHALL BE CAUSE FOR REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT. 3. DEBRIS, MUD, SILT, ETC. SHALL NOT BE DEPOSITED ON PUBLIC OR OTHER PROPERTY AT ANY TIME DURING CONSTRUCTION. ANY SUCH DEPOSITION SHALL BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY BY THE \ \ I CONTRACTOR. I co \ tp 4. ALL DRAINAGE PROTECTIVE DEVICES SUCH AS SWALES, INTERCEPTOR DITCHES, PIPES, PROTECTIVE BERMS, BARRIER WALLS, CONCRETE CHANNELS, OR OTHER MEASURES DESIGNED TO PROTECT RED HILL COUNTRY CLUB '��'��``::`. ..::���7 PROJECT SITE ADJACENT BUILDINGS OR PROPERTY FORM STORM RUNOFF MUST BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO BUILDING CONSTRUCTION. 7563 ALTA CUESTA DR, 5. THE ENGINEER OF RECORD ASSUMES RESPONSIBILITY FOR GRADING AND INSPECTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPENDIX SECTION J 105 OF THE LATEST CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE. N�.33 7 "e/ •/ RANCHO CUCAMONGA �� �� � ...... 6. EQUESTRIAN TRIALS SHALL BE SURFACED WITH A 4-INCH THICK SECTION COMPOSED OF 95% DECOMPOSED GRANITE (1/8 TO 3/8 DIAMETER) AND 5% COARSE SAND COMPACTED TO 90%. A 1� INDEX MAP p ---- COMPACTION REPORT CERTIFIED BY A SOILS ENGINEER SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO AND APPROVED BY THE CITY PRIOR TO PROJECT FINAL APPROVAL. SCALE: 1"=20' 7. FLOODWATER CONVEYANCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT ALL TIMES DURING CONSTRUCTION. THE WORK SHALL BE PHASED SO THAT NEWLY CONSTRUCTED FACILITIES ARE FULLY OPERATIONAL PRIOR TO EXISTING FACILITIES BEING REMOVED. APN 0207-044-28 8. A GRADING PLAN (CITY APPROVED) SHALL BE ON THE JOB SITE AT ALL TIMES. DEVIATIONS FORM THE PLAN SHALL BE PRECEDED BY AN APPROVED PLAN REVISION. UPON REQUEST OF THE BUILDING _j VALLEY VISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL INSPECTOR, THE REQUIRED PLAN AND REVISIONS SHALL BE PROMPTLY SUBMITTED TO THE CITY ENGINEER, OR DESIGNEE, FOR REVIEW. 9. PROTECTION OF ADJACENT PROPERTY. DURING GRADING OPERATIONS, THE PERMITTEE SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PREVENTION OF DAMAGE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY AND NO PERSON SHALL CONSTRUCTION NOTES: QUANTITIES EXCAVATE ON LAND SUFFICIENTLY CLOSE TO THE PROPERTY LINE TO ENDANGER ANY ADJOINING PUBLIC STREET, A SIDEWALK, ALLEY, OR OTHER PUBLIC OR PRIVATE PROPERTY WITHOUT SUPPORTING AND PROTECTING SUCH PROPERTY FROM SETTLING, CRACKING, OR OTHER DAMAGE WHICH MIGHT RESULT. ❑P PROTECT IN PLACE LOCATION MAP SCALE: 1"=400' 10. IMPROVEMENTS DAMAGED BY THE GRADING OPERATION LOCATED ON ADJACENT PROPERTY OR WITH PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL BE REPAIRED OR REPLACED, AS NOTED BY CITY INSPECTORS, PRIOR TO FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK. O SAWCUT CLEAN LINE, REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING ASPHALT IN CONFLICT WITH PROPOSED 11. OBSTRUCTIONS TO PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE REMOVED OR RELOCATED BEFORE BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. 1 IMPROVEMENTS. 151 LF 12. ALL WORK WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY REQUIRES SEPARATE INSPECTIONS AND PERMITS ISSUED BY THE CITY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT. O REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS IN CONFLICT WITH PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. NPDES CERTIFICATE A NOTICE OF INTENT (N01) IS NOT REQUIRED OF THIS DEVELOPMENT. 13. SHORING PLANS AND CALCULATIONS SHALL BE PROVIDED IF FOUND NECESSARY. O3 I CONSTRUCT 6" CURB & GUTTER PER CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STANDARD 104, A2-6. 95 LF _ _- 14. ALL SLOPES EXCEEDING 5' IN HEIGHT AND 5:1 OR STEEPER SHALL BE PLANTED WITH APPROVED PLANT MATERIAL AND PROVIDED WITH APPROVED WATERING SYSTEM. O CONSTRUCT 4" PCC PAVEMENT (2500 PSI MIN) WITH #3 REBAR (18" O.C. EACH WAY) OVER 03-26-19 15. SHOULD ANY UNFORESEEN SUBSURFACE STRUCTURES BE ENCOUNTERED DURING CONSTRUCTION, THEY SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ENGINEER OF RECORD, THE 4 COMPACTED NATIVE PER GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER RECOMMENDATIONS. 1412 SF GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER, AND ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT BEFORE PROCEEDING FURTHER. JOHNNY GHAZAL, PE, QSD DATE 16. UTILITY LINES (EXISTING AND PROPOSED) WITHIN THE WORK AREA SHALL BE LOCATED AND THE DEPTHS CONFIRMED BY THE CONTRACTOR. IF THE IMPROVEMENTS CANNOT BE CONSTRUCTED PER O BELGARD BERGERAC MODULAR PAVEMENT SYSTEM PER ARCHITECTS PLANS. 148 SF ENGINEER OF RECORD PLAN BECAUSE OF CONFLICTS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DISCUSS MODIFICATIONS WITH THE CITY INSPECTOR TO DETERMINE IF A PLAN REVISION OR A FIELD CHANGE IS REQUIRED. ( ) O CONSTRUCT VARIABLE HEIGHT MASONRY RETAINING WALL TYPE "B" PER SPPWC STANDARD 618-3, 189 LF 17. ALL WALLS RETAINING AND GARDEN OVER 3 FEET IN FINISH HEIGHT REQUIRE SEPARATE PLANS SUBMITTAL AND DESIGN, REVIEW, PERMITS, AND INSPECTION. HEIGHTS PER PLAN (SEPARATE PERMIT). RAILING PER ARCHITECTS PLAN. 18 CALL ODE. CONSTRUCT SHOWN HEREON SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STANDARDS AND APPENDIX J AND CHAPTERS 18 AND 23 OF THE LATEST CALIFORNIA BUILDING O CONSTRUCT 2' WIDE BY 6" DEEP CONCRETE V-DITCH, 3" THICK CONCRETE EMBEDDED WITH 6X6 WELDED WIRE 35 LF EXISTING SURVEY MONUMENT PRESERVATION LAND S� 19. GRADING INSPECTIONS: MESH. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE IDENTIFIED ALL SURVEY MONUMENTS OF p,S D. �L �v O� INSTALL 18" DROP INLET. VERIFY AND CONNECT TO EXISTING 4" SD RECORD THAT COULD BE DISTURBED BY THIS PROJECT. ALL SAID LINE. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY � < o a. PRIOR TO THE START OF GRADING OPERATIONS, THE OWNER AND GRADING CONTRACTOR SHALL REQUEST A PRE-GRADING MEETING. THE MEETING SHALL BE ATTENDED BY THE PROJECT O J INVERT ELEVATIONS AND CONDITION OF LINE PRIOR TO COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION 1 EA MONUMENTS WHICH CURRENTLY EXIST SHALL BE PROTECTED IN PLACE OR . OWNER/REPRESENTATIVE, THE GRADING CONTRACTOR AND THE BUILDING INSPECTOR TO DISCUSS ABOUT GRADING REQUIREMENTS AND PREVENTIVE MEASURES, ETC. IF A PRE-GRADING MEETING REPLACED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 8771 OF THE CALIFORNIA LS 9320 IS NOT HELD WITHIN 24 HOURS FROM THE START OF GRADING OPERATIONS, THE GRADING PERMIT MAY BE SUBJECT TO SUSPENSION BY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR; Og INSTALL 18" PRECAST DROP INLET WITH TRAFFIC RATED GRATE, SEE DETAIL SHEET 2. 1 EA BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONS. CODE. b. THE GRADING CONTRACTOR SHALL CALL INTO THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT AT LEAST 1 WORKING DAY IN ADVANCE TO REQUEST THE FOLLOWING GRADING INSPECTIONS PRIOR TO CONTINUING GRADING OPERATIONS: 10 INSTALL 9" NDS CATCH BASIN OR APPROVED EQUAL. 6 EA ST C lV La. THE BOTTOM OF THE OVER-EXCAVATION �g�FOF CAL�FO� � Lb. COMPLETION OF ROUGH GRADING, PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE BUILDING PERMIT; 11 CONSTRUCT 4 PVC OR ABS STORM DRAIN BELOW SWALE FLOWLINE CAD 0.5% PIPE SLOPE. 112 LF NICHOLAS D. ELLIS, PLS DATE i.c. AT THE COMPLETION OF ROUGH GRADING, THE GRADING CONTRACTOR OR OWNER SHALL SUBMIT TO THE PERMIT TECHNICIANS (ENGINEERING SERVICES FRONT COUNTER) AN ORIGINAL AND A 12 CONSTRUCT DRIVEWAY APPROACH PER CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STANDARD 101, W=17'. COPY OF THE PAD CERTIFICATIONS TO BE PREPARED BY AND PROPERLY WET SIGNED AND SEALED BY THE CIVIL ENGINEER AND SOILS ENGINEER OF RECORD; Ld. THE ROUGH GRADING CERTIFICATES AND THE COMPACTION REPORTS WILL BE REVIEWED BY THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AND APPROVED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING 13 CONSTRUCT CURBSIDE DRAIN OUTLET PER CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STANDARD 107-A. 1 EA SOILS ENGINEER CERTIFICATE PERMIT. 20. PRE-WATERING OF THE PROJECT/CONSTRUCTION SITE 14 CONSTRUCT 6'X6'X2' DEEP INFILTRATION TRENCH USING %4" WASHED ROCK. 36 SF I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE REVIEWED THIS PLAN AND THAT IT pFESS/ SUBSTANTIALLY CONFORMS TO SOILS REPORT NO. A-6715-18 DATED % P� ONq 15 CONSTRUCT 3" PVC STORM DRAIN @ 0.5% MIN SLOPE. 73 LF AUGUST 25, 2018 PREPARED BY: �� F T E a. THE PRE-WATERING ACTIVITIES SHALL NOT OCCUR WITHIN 24-HOURS AFTER A RAINY DAY; � �' �ti9 G, b. THE PRE-WATERING ACTIVITIES SHALL BE DONE DURING THE DAY TIME AND THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MONITOR THE WATERING AND CORRECT OVER-WATERING SITUATIONS; SOIL PACIFIC INC. co S _ � Z 16 CONSTRUCT FULL LIFT ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT. 148 SFFn c. CONTRACTORS SHALL IDENTIFY AND USE THE RECLAIMED OR RECYCLED WATER SOURCES, IF IT IS AVAILABLE, FOR WATERING ACTIVITIES. 675 N. ECKHOFF STREET, SUITE A, ORANGE, CALIFORNIA 92868 w No. C50121 m 0PROVIDE 2' WIDE BY 0.1' DEEP COLD MILL AND ASPHALT CONCRETE OVERLAY FOR PAVEMENT JOIN. 300 SF 0714-879-1203 rx 21. PRIOR TO THE INSTALLATION OF ANY SURFACE OR SUBSURFACE STRUCTURAL STORM WATER TREATMENT INFILTRATION DEVICES (COMMONLY REFERRED TO AS BMP'S), THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSTRUCT 4" SEWER SERVICE LATERAL PER CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT STANDARD 201. XsT C/V SCARIFY TO BOTTOM OF THE INFILTRATION DEVICE TO A MINIMUM OF 12-INCHES IN DEPTH. 18 CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY INVERT ELEVATIONS AT CONNECTION POINTS PRIOR TO STARTING CONSTRUCTION. 1 EA gTFOF CAU\F 19 CONSTRUCT 4" CLEANOUT PER CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT STANDARD 201. 1 EA HOSS EFTEKHARI, RCE C50121 DATE PRIVATE ENGINEERS NOTICE TO CONTRACTOR: 1. THE EXISTENCE AND LOCATION OF ANY UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND/OR STRUCTURES SHOWN ON THESE PLANS WERE OBTAINED BY A SEARCH OF THE AVAILABLE RECORDS. 20 CONSTRUCT ON-SITE 4" SDR-35 SEWER LINE (2% MIN SLOPE). 30 LF APPROVAL OF THESE PLANS BY THE CITY DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A REPRESENTATION AS TO THE ACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OF THE LOCATION OR THE EXISTENCE OR 21 CONSTRUCT 1" WATER SERVICE PER CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT STANDARD 102. 1 EA NON-EXISTENCE OF ANY UTILITY AND/OR STRUCTURE WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THIS PROJECT. THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO TAKE ALL DUE PRECAUTIONARY MEANS TO PROTECT THE UTILITIES OF RECORD OR NOT OF RECORD OR NOT SHOWN ON THESE PLANS. 22 CONSTRUCT FENCE SCREEN PER ARCHITECTS PLANS 7 LF 2. RELOCATION OR REMOVAL OF ANY UTILITY OWNED FACILITIES SHALL BE PERFORMED BY THE RESPECTIVE UTILITY OWNERS. 3. IT IS REQUESTED THAT THE GRADING CONTRACTOR NOTIFY THIS PRIVATE ENGINEER BY CALLING AT LEAST 48 HOURS BEFORE COMPLETION OF THE GRADING OPERATION IN ORDER UTILITY PURVEYORS THAT THIS OFFICE MAY PERFORM A FINAL INSPECTION WITH OUR GRADE CERTIFICATION COMMITMENT TO THE CITY, IF APPLICABLE. WATER CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 909-987-2591 SEWER CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 909-987-2591 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ALL REQUIRED PERMITS PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION.. TELEPHONE FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS 855-386-1691 CABLE SPECTRUM 888-892-4357 5. UNAUTHORIZED CHANGES AND USES: THE ENGINEER PREPARING THESE PLANS WILL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR, OR LIABLE FOR, UNAUTHORIZED CHANGES TO OR USES OF THESE ELECTRIC SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 800-655-4555 PLANS. ALL CHANGES TO THE PLANS MUST BE IN WRITING AND MUST BE APPROVED BY THE PREPARER OF THESE PLANS AND THE CITY. X SHEET NO. SHEET DESCRIPTION GRADING QUANTITIES: BENCHMARK / DATUM NOTES: 0 1 TITLE SHEET CUT: 40 CY FILL: 520 CY IMPORT: 480 CY HORIZONTAL CONTROL FOR TOPOGRAPHIC MAPPING IS BASED UPON THE AREA QUANTITIES: OWNER: SURVEYOR: 2 GRADING PLAN & DETAILS THE OPINION OF EARTHWORK QUANTITIES SHOWN ABOVE ARE UNADJUSTED GROSS VOLUMES AND DO CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM, NAD 83 ZONE 5 (2011.00 EPOCH). LEGAL DESCRIPTION z 3 SECTIONS NOT INCLUDE THE EFFECTS OF SCARIFYING, OVEREXCAVATION, RECOMPACTION, SHRINKAGE, " " " LOT 18 OF TRACT 2573 IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, LOT AREA (GROSS/NET).......... 10,411 SF (0.239 ACRES) 7568 AL EZVISTA DETE R KOTIAZAD FOOTHILL OLAS DURELLIS,GPLS 4 CUT/ FILL EXHIBIT SUBSIDENCE OR OTHER FACTORS AND SUBJECT TO FIELD CONDITIONS THAT MAY BE SPECIFIED IN BENCHMARK: FOUND 1 IRON PIPE WITH NAIL AND TAG SB CO SURVEY", COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER w DOWN 6" AT APPARENT CL INTERSECTION OF ALATA CUESTA AND CAM MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 38, PAGES 44 AND 45, IN THE IMPERVIOUS AREA (4,245 SF TOTAL): RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 PO BOX 8026 THE SOILS REPORT AND ARE FOR REFERENCE AND FEE PURPOSES ONLY. SINCE THE ENGINEER 909-587-9654 ALTA LOMA, CA 91701 L1J CANNOT CONTROL THE EXACT METHOD OR MEANS USED BY THE CONTRACTOR DURING GRADING NORTE. ELEV=1462.01 OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN BERNARDINO BUILDING FOOTPRINT............. 2,625 SF (25.2% COVERAGE) WWW.FOOTHILLSURVE\ING.COM = OPERATIONS, NOR CAN THE ENGINEER GUARANTEE THE EXACT SOIL CONDITIONS OVER THE ENTIRE COUNTY. SITE, THE ENGINEER ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR FINAL EARTHWORK QUANTITIES. VERTICAL DATUM BASED ON NAVD 1988. GPS DERIVED ELEVATIONS. PROPOSED PAVEMENT...........1,630 SF C0 AREA OF DISTURBANCE............ 11,665 SF REVISIONS RpFESS/ON CIVIL ENGINEER / PREPARED BY: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SHEET Q ® NO. DATE DESCRIPTION APP. F� ( T • Ghg�F� JOHNNY T. GHAZAL,P.E. DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING & SAFETY / PUBLIC WORKS 1 4 PO BOX 7100 OF z REDLANDS, CA 92375 No. C76395 PHONE: (909) 534-9875 PRECISE GRADING PLAN PLAN Know what's I�elOW. `sTgT 03-26-19 7563 ALTA CUESTA DRIVE NUMBER 'z OF CAL�F� Call before you dig. JOHNNY T. GHAZAL P.E. DATE TITLE SHEET RCE C76395, EXP. 12/31/20 DRC 2018-00160 I CONSTRUCTION NOTES: ABBREVIATIONS �P PROTECT IN PLACE AC ASPHALT CONCRETE APN ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER O SAWCUT CLEAN LINE, REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING ASPHALT IN CONFLICT WITH BC BEGINNING OF CURVE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. C&G CENBER ND GUTTER 0 REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS IN CONFLICT WITH PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. CLF CHAIN LINK FENCE CA CD CMU CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT O3 CONSTRUCT 6" CURB & GUTTER PER CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STANDARD 104, A2-6. DWY DRIVEWAY SET NAIL AND TAG LS 9320, IN X, EC END OF CURVE P EPDXY AT TOP OF BLOCK WALL, SET O CONSTRUCT 4" PCC PAVEMENT (2500 PSI MIN) WITH #3 REBAR (18" O.C. EACH WAY) OVER ELEC ELECTRIC BY PROPORTION. COMPACTED NATIVE PER GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER RECOMMENDATIONS. EP EDGE OF PAVEMENT 58.71 INV APN 0207-044-14 ES EXISTING SURFACE (PAVEMENT) NOT ACCESSIBLE FOR 5 BELGARD BERGERAC MODULAR PAVEMENT SYSTEM PER ARCHITECTS PLANS. EX EXISTING I 9 58.75 TG/FL SURVEY, PLOTTED I APN 0207-044-07 O 56.38 INV 4" PIPES FROM VISUAL WALL FID FOUND 59.34 TG 59.48 TG w I O CONSTRUCT VARIABLE HEIGHT MASONRY RETAINING WALL TYPE "B" PER SPPWC STANDARD FL FLOW LINE WALL OBSERVATIONS 10 10 FD NAIL & TAG LS 5113 IN PCC DWY P w n P 57.4s INV 57.75 IN P 618-3, HEIGHTS PER PLAN (SEPARATE PERMIT). RAILING PER ARCHITECTS PLAN. FS FINISHED SURFACE CONCRETE FOOTING OF BLOCK WALL, 60.00 TW G GAS � P NO REFERENCE, ACCEPTED AS 58.00 TF /711 P FENCE 60.00 TW PROPERTY CORNER. RESET NAIL AND O CONSTRUCT 2' WIDE BY 6" DEEP CONCRETE V-DITCH, 3" THICK CONCRETE EMBEDDED WITH 6X6 GB GRADE BREAK 59.05 FL PL 56.00 TF ICV IRRIGATION CONTROL VALVE Ir S80° 18'20"E 08 2 TREE TAG LS 9320 IN SAME POSITION. WELDED WIRE MESH. STA 10+95.02, END C&G N� _ _ INV INVERT 59.02 TC, 58.52 FL ° - _ _ _ _ �_� - - - - - O8 INSTALL 18" DROP INLET. VERIFY AND CONNECT TO EXISTING 4" SD LINE. CONTRACTOR TO L LENGTH __ 1.0% 1.0% _ 1_0% I I LF LINEAL FEET STA 10+92.02 13 _f.. -..co 5�91 FS .:�\-.. �,<- -- -- H-- -o -..�_.--_ \ I I I i E F L - . � _ / I I I VERIFY INVERT ELEVATIONS AND CONDITION OF LINE PRIOR TO COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION MB MAIL BOX t - A o 0 59.63 TG : 1 I 9 INSTALL 18 PRECAST BUBBLER OUTLET WITH TRAFFIC RATED GRATE, SEE DETAIL SHEET 2. MH MANHOLE 2.0% 7FS ° 58.04 INV MIN MINIMUM _ 60.00 Fc� I/ 1 / 10 INSTALL 9 NDS CATCH BASIN OR APPROVED EQUAL. NTS NOT TO SCALE PB PULL BOX CONSTRUCT 4" PVC OR ABS STORM DRAIN (2% PIPE SLOPE) BELOW SWALE FLOWLINE.Ec 5 20 �S 3;% 60..00 / OI I 12 CONSTRUCT DRIVEWAY APPROACH PER CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STANDARD 101 W=17'. SOW SEWER OF WAY -54.0 N ' ®/ IW 1 � SDMH STORM DRAIN MANHOLE a• °a `aj a ° ° °` ° a ® 0 1 c i 13 CONSTRUCT CURBSIDE DRAIN OUTLET PER CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STANDARD 107-A. SF SQUARE FEET STA 10+74.43 I 4 °` SMH SEWER MANHOLE 12 ,_a ° °� °° ° M 11 / / 1 °� 14 CONSTRUCT 6'X6'X2' DEEP INFILTRATION TRENCH USING 3/4" WASHED ROCK. STD STANDARD CL DWY, W=16.00 _ 1 O STA STATION ° f° °°I ° ° Q e o °a `O _ ]II \ t° 59.80 TG 10 / 1 I: 2 BUILDING 15 CONSTRUCT 4" PVC STORM DRAIN @ 2% MIN SLOPE. TC TOP OF CURB �r of i i �y 58.38 INV / 16 TF TOP OF FOOTING 19y55.05f INV' F 1 CONSTRUCT FULL LIFT ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT. TP TOP OF PAVEMENT o 4 '3� ° ° ° �° C' 59.91 TG/FL HIP /I / / PIL TYP TYPICAL Z 60.00 FG - 2" STEP 58.63 INV 10/ / I `� 2 THE 17 PROVIDE 2' WIDE BY 0.1' DEEP COLD MILL AND ASPHALT CONCRETE OVERLAY FOR PAVEMENT JOIN. TW TOP OF WALL 20 60.00 FG I 1 / I W WATER STA 10+61.94 18 4°ss �a ss / so.4o FS / / 1 � ' '� z 18 (PER SEPARATE PERMIT) CONSTRUCT 4" SEWER SERVICE LATERAL PER CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER WV WATER VALVE (53.60t INV) 59.30 FS 5 / / 0 I�v, N o DISTRICT STANDARD 201 . CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY INVERT ELEVATIONS AT CONNECTION POINTS PRIOR TO Q 417 55.66t INV 1 SEWER CONTINUATION PER i c5�i. STARTING CONSTRUCTION. -60.50 Fs ARCHITECTS PLANS, 6®�40°FS 19 (PER SEPARATE PERMIT) CONSTRUCT 4" CLEANOUT PER CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT LEGEND CENTER LINE 1 60.25 FS VERIFY INVERT PRIOR T / M / / o ® � STANDARD 201 . °°2%° MIN START OF CONSTRUCTIO /° I 60.00 FSco U� �i / 15 �F I / PROPERTY LINE 59.24 TC/FS o o ° m a \ / 54.00 TF O �, 60.29 FS / ��P 20 (PER SEPARATE PERMIT) CONSTRUCT ON 4 SDR-35 SEWER LINE (2% MIN SLOPE). �60.50,FS' g LJLJI �F - - EXISTING EASEMENT STA 10+49.44 21 w wow FF 60.67 � 21 (PER SEPARATE PERMIT) CONSTRUCT 1 " WATER SERVICE PER CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER li 3 wu 59.34 FS 60.00 FG PD�60.17 60.30 TG 10 / � 2 ALL 1450) DISTRICT STANDARD 102. r EXISTING COUTOUR Q A ° 4 ,� ° 461A0'4 / 58.97 INV / - O _ ` 50 PROPOSED CONTOUR ^ I\ ` 22 CONSTRUCT FENCE SCREEN PER ARCHITECTS PLANS. 16 IL rn �� � FILE / / 60.30 TG 10 �1�,/° # NDS 9"X9" SQUARE CUT/FILL LINE 15 �� �d� - 9.30 INV o / J POLYOLEFIN GRATE CD i -°f P TREE TG PER PLAN EX FENCE 17 co z 2.00% �� o / , 60 °/ S, i 1.0� MIN 1.0%-MIN 18, 0% i , / a ° a /° / �/ . /i i \\ \\ \\� -...�-------_...�...- PROPOSED FLOW LINE W i - - i �� /ice//\/v 7T,�T 25' 25' / 7 ° PROPOSED SLOPE �� 10 60./30 TG / a FS° 2 BRIDGE NDS 9"X9" CATCH BASIN RISER so.00 FG-,. 5�.5o IN / 4.00IW7 �F APN 0207-044-30 o WALL PAVEMENT' i f �° '} / °° FS' ° Q9 4 a L ry / / 60.40 FPS o " PROPOSED 6' FENCE cc L ° ° o ° / � A /EX�ST/NG NDS 9 LOW PROFILE ADAPTER 60.40 FS}- 8.0 / % UTILITy NDS UNIVERSAL OUTLET ° T _ _ j_ �6.40 F� 1 ° 6 .0 �VBLIC PROPOSED SD & FL J TREE 2 CLEANOUT 60.00 Tt1V I 6Q 36°TG°�� 00 TJIV 2 TREES EASE PROPOSED SD PIPE b 10 59.56 TG CD 8.00 TF - \ 58.96 IN ° - bO�Ti~°a <0 o MENT 4" PVC RISER 57.8 V �� - _ I / o / _ �� 0 �� / STORM DRAIN LINE PER PLAN MH #28 M N \ rn WALL YARD DRAIN & INLET CVWD DRAWING NO. 63-S6 7 -- 2 0 6 CATCH BASIN / / P H=3' (53.89f INV) 2.0% FENCE/GATE \ I II fit. ( // / 14 PRECAST DROP INLET JOIN EX WALL EXISTING STRUCTURE I co \ I / ° (46.00 43.00 TF) 44.80 TG / TREE 2 I I 8 42.80 INV CB I 2.00% I I �GJ 41.50 INV PIPE W PROPOSED WATER STA 10+00.00 I �a� � WALL 2 / � �"'I•.�.._ \ / by BOTTOM CONNECTION _ I NDS 9"X9" DRAIN S PROPOSED SEWER / \ I / 1' I BEGIN C&G �i - � 15 10 59.48 TC _ �� �� � � _ � � � � � �/ - � i ti 1�... 1 58.98 FL I - \ CONNECT TO 4" PVC SD � �� � � - -�� � � \ r•�•�" � N.T.S. PROPOSED SEWER CLEANOUT I - -_- - �� \ \ I EXIST SD A HYDROLOGY & HYDRAULICS STUDY WILL BE PROVIDED -�_� - - I DURING FINAL ENGINEERING REVIEW TO SUBSTANTIATE I N74! - s \ \�� \ \ �\� 8" W EXISTING WATER PL 33-Vj1,W- \ \` 46.00 TW P THE EXISTING OR SELECTED STORM DRAIN PIPE SIZE. I P AC PAVEMENT -- = 43.00 TF DRAINAGE EASEMENT TO BE PROVIDED ALONG ALIGNMENT R/W 8" S EXISTING SEWER z N P FENCE _V/IF OF SD THROUGH PROPERTY 0207-044-30 UP TO VALLE CL I rn 46.00 TW -- - VISTA DRIVE RIGHT-OF-WAY. G EXISTING GAS 0 J Lp FENCE/WALL 43.00 TF z N¢ APN 0207-044-28 6 " I PROVIDE PAVED MB MAILBOX FD 1 IRON PIPE WITH PLASTIC PLUG, SWALE/CHANNEL � ¢~ P LS 5113 NO REFERENCE, ACCEPTED P FL w Ad AS PROPERTY CORNER PARKWAY CULVERT I TRAFFIC RATED GRATE o EX TREE 00 N Q_ TG AND INVERT PER PLAN afUZ I I 2.0% w I 2 0% SWALEE PER PLAN o w`� EASTERLY ® E UTILITY POLE w z CL R/W �- 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 / /\` EX STREET LIGHT w o / \/\\/ EX MANHOLE w v 25' j 18' 7' EX PULL BOX/UTILITY BOX wV E WATER VALVE LID I 0 ��\ � � X R w / +0 EX FIRE HYDRANT Q Z I �\ \� 4" STORM DRAIN N J PIPE PER PLAN CAD 2% SLOPE _ 15 EX AC BERM TO BE /\\ \//� PROPOSED CONCRETE \/ �� oa �� 2' REMOVED / ��� / (2.0%f) 17 I 2.0% o�oDoQo PROPOSED ASPHALT PROVIDE OPENING IN 10 5 0 10 20 30 PROVIDE 20 MIL IMPERMEABLE 0) \/� BOTTOM (6" DIAMETER MIN) a LINER ALONG R/W LINE, �/ T�oQ Two \ GRIND & OVERLAY EXTEND 2 BEYOND GRAVEL. \\ ��� \� PROVIDE 24"X24"X24" COMPACTED EXISTING PAVEMENT SECTION P 3 UNDER BASIN 4" GRAVEL SCALE: 1"=10' 16 ALTA CUESTA DRIVE BUBBLER OUTLET TYPICAL SECTION N.T.S. N.T.S. R E V S O N S CIVIL ENGINEER / PREPARED BY: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SHEET Q�pFESS/ON � NO. DATE DESCRIPTION APP. �� ( T q��.' JOHNNY T. GHAZAL,P.E. DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING & SAFETY / PUBLIC WORKS ® PO BOX 7100 2 OF 4 `=' o Z REDLANDS, CA 92375 No. C76395 PHONE: (909) 534-9875 PRECISE GRADING PLAN PLAN 7563 ALTA CUESTA DRIVE NUMBER Know what,s below. CIVIL �� 03-26-19 FOF CAQ Call before you dig. JOHNNY T. GHAZAL P.E. DATE GRADING PLAN & DETAILS RCE C76395, EXP. 12/31/20 D RC 2018-00160 STREET EASTERLY EASTERLY CL R/W PL EX PUBLIC UTILITY _ 3' LIMITS OF GRADING PROPOSED STREET IMPROVEMEENTS EASEMENT SEE STREET TYPICAL SECTION ON SHEET 2 I o 25.0' 25.0' I M 18.0' 10, O 60.40 FS o ALTA CUESTA DR 8" MIN BELOW FO (TYP) PROPOSED HOUSE 10 4 60.40 FS Z 60.67 FF 60.17 PAD 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.0% MIN I Q a a as e a s e a a s �— _ % —i -/ ����/ % —% — �� / /� '/ / / / / //// /// 2.0' V\V\V\V\V\V\V\V\\ V\V\V\\\\\V\/\V\V\V\V\V\V\V\VV�\V\\\\—��/��/��/��/��/��/��/��/��/��/��/��/��/ /IC� 6 w \V/\V/\V/\V/\V/\V/\V/\V/\V/\V/\V/\V/\V/\V/\V/\V/\V/\V/\V/\V/\ \V/\V/\\� V/\V/\V/\V/\V/\V/\V/\V/V V/ /\\ \7\'�i�l �S a �� �� �� �� � �� �� \� \� �� �� �� �� �� � �� �� �� �� �� �� �� � �� 2.•1 v�i I NEW FENCING PER / / / / / 7 / // /� /� / � � /� X// �//T/ �� \�� �-� �'1•q,�, I ARCHITECTS PLANS \\V\V\V\V\V\V\V\V\V\V\V\V\V\V\V\V\V\V\V\V\V\V\V\V\V\V\V\V\V �V\V\V\V\V\V\V\V\V\V\V\V\V\V\\\ �\ V/\V/\VV/\V/\V/V //V//V//V//V//V//V//V//V//V//V//V//V//V//V//V//V//V//V//V//V//V/ �� \ V/ IN M ��/��/��/��/��/��/��/��/�� �� X�//��/ / /� \ \/AA\VA\VA\VA\VA\VA\VA\VA\VA\VA\VA\VA\VAA\VAA\VAA\VAA\VA\VA\VA\VA\VA\VA\VA\VA\VA\VA\VA \ � \/i\/i\ /\/i\/i\/i\/i\/i\/i\/i\/i\/i\/i\/i\ \ \ \ \/i\/i\/i\/i\/i\/i\/i\/i\/i\/i\/i\�\�\�\�\ \� /\/i\/i\/i\/i\/i\/i � � � / ii / / i /i��/ \/��/��/��/��/��/��/��/��/��/��/i��/i��/i��/i��/��/��/��/��/��/��/��/��/��/��/i��/i��/i��/i��/i��/i��/i� /��i � � � /��i��i\��i\��i\��i\��i��i� i\/i\/i\/i\i\i\i\i\/i\/i\/i\/i\i\//\i\/i\i\i\i\i\\\i\/i\/i\/i\/i\/i\/i\/i\/i\/i\/i\/i\i\i\i\i\/i\/i\/i\/i\/i\/i\/i\/i\/i\/i\i\i\i\i\i\i\i\i\i /\/i\/i\/i\/i\/i\/ \i\i\/i\/i i i i i i i SECTION "A" CONSTRUCTION NOTES: HORIZ & VERT SCALE: 1 "=5' ❑P PROTECT IN PLACE O CONSTRUCT 4" PCC PAVEMENT (2500 PSI MIN) OVER COMPACTED NATIVE PER GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER RECOMMENDATIONS. O CONSTRUCT VARIABLE HEIGHT MASONRY RETAINING WALL TYPE "B" PER CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STANDARD 604, HEIGHTS PER PLAN (SEPARATE PERMIT). RAILING PER ARCHITECTS PLAN. 10 INSTALL 9" NDS CATCH BASIN OR APPROVED EQUAL. 11 CONSTRUCT 4" PVC OR ABS STORM DRAIN (2% PIPE SLOPE) BELOW SWALE FLOWLINE. NORTHERLY SOUTHERLY PL PL LIMITS OF GRADING/WORK r � NORTHERLY NORTHERLY LIMITS OF GRADING/WORK I PL PL Nt o o Iti It It ,`I o o c� - f— LIMITS OF - f— LIMITS OF 01 0 4 GRADING/WORK 4 GRADING/WORK Z 10.0' Z � of of a Q EX FENCING P Q I o f 1714 oo P FENCE / I 10 lo' VARIES�I P EX FENCING z a 3.0' f U �j; I J 5% MIN 60.40 FS D � Q 60.00 FIG PROPOSED HOUSE 10 WALL �1 30'wf EX GROUND I P WALL N 8" MIN BELOW FF (TYP) 4 60.40 FS w \� H=4' P rfi Q (0f) , EX GROUND ,! 60.67 FF /max\x\x\ i — 71 �/ PROP SURFACE w / ' v _ — — — — SZ0.17 PAD 2.00% 2.00% ¢ /\\/\\/\\ EX PCC i � N EX GROUND \\\7\\ a /A��\��\��V DRIVEWAY v _ \\VA�\VA�\\ (0%f) \ \ \ \ V A\� \ . TW PER PLAN v �//�//�//T ��/�/� iT��T T____-- / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / 1 �, / / / / , - -- \, \ /\ \T\ //, V//V/ V//V//V/ /V�/V�/V�/V�/ /V/V/V/V�/V�/V�/V�/V�/V�/V�/V�/V�/V� �pi� /V�\V�\V�\�\�� M9,� FL PER PLAN \ V� ���/ ��� /� � �� � � � � �� � � v � �/ �� � �-� EX PCC WALKWAY /\/ /////////////////////// //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// // // // // �/ �� �T HEIGHT VARIES \//\//\//\//\//\//\//\//\//\/ / \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ X \� \� \� \� \� \� \� \ %4 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \� � SECTION C SECTIOND \\/\\ //\X//\X//\x//\//\�//\ XxI//\�//\�//\�//\� \� \� \� \� \� \� \ /\//\//\//\//\//\//\//\//\//\//\//\//\//\//\//\//\�//\�//\�//\�//\�//\�//\�//\T HORIZ & VERT SCALE: 1 =5 HORIZ & VERT SCALE: 1 =5 \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ SECTION "B" HORIZ & VERT SCALE: 1"=5' R E V S O N S CIVIL ENGINEER / PREPARED BY: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SHEET Q ,gFESS/ON NO. DATE DESCRIPTION APP. F� ( T • q�F JOHNNY T. GHAZAL,P.E. DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING & SAFETY / PUBLIC WORKS =' ® o y9� � PO BOX 7100 3 CE 4 � z REDLANDS, CA 92375 NO. C76395 mPHONE: (909) 534-9875 PRECISE GRADING PLAN PLAN 7563 ALTA CUESTA DRIVE NUMBER Know what's below. CIV IL �P 03-26-19 FOF CA\ Call before you dig. JOHNNY T. GHAZAL P.E. DATE SECTIONS RICE C76395, EXP. 12/31/20 D RC 2018-00160 I I `-� � 1 � I � I N' � � I � � \ � � � APN 0207-044-14 X � X � � I X, APN 0207-044-07 1 � X, I � I I � I \ I I . I I 1-�: p I S807-118' 20"E 1 1 4.08' 1 -j - -- -- - . � —\// ,"% -- \/ �-/ -z *:* . ... ... . .....- ..- , llllllllllll ORION � - — - - - """ .. m m m m m m m�m � m" W A ::: --- - - - ........"' .::.:...:...::.: - .. ... :. -.-""'.'.*.'-""-."-..'-'.".,-.,.,--,.,.*".*- .: 1*--.. - - - -- : : .. .'."..,'...,.--..'.,.-I......*...'.."...'--.*...'-.., --1..-:: - --- -�-�...��. :::: .. :............. . .. -..-..--.... .... - - .. , .:......: -.--..---..... -.............-.... .. . . . . .. ,: I N .� :. .1. ::,* .��." .. ....--�.-..:..'.....:.-..-.-7.-.-.�..-..-.--..-...:.-...-.-�..-.................,..::..::......:.,., .: --:-*� .. -::*.'. .... -� . . . .. .. ...:: .. . ::.,. :, ::; . :..-..-'-..-. . ... .. .. .... ..: :....... ::::::::. ::..::.:............... ::. : :: -- ..: :.- - �::- . . - - ......'..'..-..... // I -::.,: ::; ::. : :I::,.�::..-�. ..�.'-,�-'.--�.-.'.-.*.-�.�..,-.:.-.'.����.*...�.-.'.-*..-�.-.'.-.*.��.*.-*-.�.-.'.�.,-.:.�.:.-*.-*..-:.�..*.-,...:::.-.'.-.* ..........':,; :......*.......... :::.....:::..... .: ......... .. :::: ...: :.:. . �.:::.. .: .. - -::: ::::,.::::::.:.:: .:::: :::: -- - .: �:::..m.: . . �:: . : � : ,�r: .............. � ... .. ..... ..... . ..... �... . ..�... .: - ...,:: -.�-�--- - - *...ii�;� ;. .... ...: .. .. I... -::-'' , . .1 . - . ----- mi� " "....E�� - 1% / � I / - I : .. . ::......- ..- - ::. ........ " -, .- -`-,--'--`,`---'-`-`--,:`-,�,--,-- :.. .'-..,.'-' -- .........* :.*.* , ':....... ,--:--.*-::-,��* .�....�- :..........+...........: -'--'----*-*-*- ... - .... - ... .. ... ..... ... ....-.-....,.........,:....': . ..:... ...... ..... .�.' .................... .... - ... i / . 992� ... �-: .. .:.� , , -- . - - .1 ..:�-1:�:-*--:m--.-*�:- . , ..--..... .. : 7'� "'.:*, - - - - - --...:mw--.--.---:: . .. -1 ..... ::::::-�.-::.,*...,.....�-.-:::::...::.*:...:::...'... � , *,�- f...: ...:�.�....::.....,-.::....*-�..-.::-��-..-:.�.-...�:.....-.:....::�:.--:-�.....::.....,--.:.-,.:.,...:..,.::�.-..:�..,...--:�....-,...-.: . - , - , , , * :� , , � --* ... ......... - , ., .. - - .. - - , - I . . I :.-�`�-�-::��-.�-��.'�-.:-: *-.::..:.-.�....::��::.....,.�:....-.:....::�:.. .:.. , . :.:.:..: ---�-*---�i---,-,------*---'-'--'.--------'.` - , ., .. - - .. .. � ,. . 1, / - . - .. .:.:..-.-......:.-.........:....:.-...-...:.-..-.-...-......:...,...--..-...:.-.,..,.-.:...,..*.::..,...,..:..*..:.-,:.,...:.-.,...,.::..,...*..:...*.-.,-.:.*..:.-,...,.-.:.*..,..:...,...,..:....:.-,- ::.-,...........:....::.'.'...:::��7.-.'�.-....-::...:.-,...*.- . .. I . I : � `-*-"-"-'-,.,-*".*.,"*.".,-".""",'*'**"'*'*'* .... �.. ... .. :,. :: . . . . .-,--:--.-*--::-,.--,.- :.-'..-*...:...,..,*..::.*....,-.:.-,..:.*-.,:.., . ....� 11 : __--- ..........-.-,-,.-.-.-..-.--..-.-'..-'.....-.--.-..--.-'..-'.-'.-.'-.*-.*-.'*-'..-.'.".*.-...,....-..-..-..-..-.-*-.".-.'--'.--.-.-.- "........' .. - .. . . . I �. ..I S M* * --`-R--*--*----"------. . - . -6.. , .. �.:.: .. .. I.. . - - - --- -- ----...........--..".-------'.- , .. - .��'.. .��'.*..' ..'.'�'.*:: - -......... .. ...,.".,--.,.,..*..*....",."..,,---,..,:...: :.::: .�.�.:�::�:.-::-,....- . ; 1 1 . .. ........ i'�.".1'.':�: �*�'-*.--:...-��:..-.::��..-.:.....,.::....,.-�....�:�:....�:�...::...- , , - - .......-.-.--..-.--..-..-.--.-.-....-..-..--..-.--..-...-..-.-..-..-.-.-..---....-..-..-.-...-.-.-......-.-..----.-....---..........--...-.-...-.....--..-.....--....:,-.--.---.-.--.----.-----.--.--.------- - - . �.'�.�'--`.`--' - , :::---` ,* -*` - :....".,.,.......................- - - �-�..-----......�.-.-------- . ,-..::....,-.:.�.:�:....:��:...�...*...::��...-:.�.::��....'..-:....:�:.:. �........ ... .......... ��----- -----�:- ..... . ......................... .. � ............;.........:..... - . . ... ... .. - .....- . ... ..- 11" I-- , / ..`--`---',...,-,---..---.* ---- .--*'* x * � I I I I .. ::- ...................... - - .: -:.. -* --. -* ...:.-., -.'..., .,...*...........* -% .....:.......... . -:. .- �............'...... ..-.'.-*.-.:.,...,..:..*....,-.:.,..:...,..*.-.:....,..,:.-.*-.:.....*-.:.*...:.-.'.-*.-.:...,.,....,...,....:...,.::.-,....:..*....:...,.:.-.*.....,.::...:.--.,--:--.-:.-.'. -':...-.*.:-�,�..'...-...,..*..'..'....-.-::: .:: :,::.- -.-.,.,.-.-::.- I I I 1 ::............ . I .. ........... ... ... .. :. :- I ::- . ....... ...- . I ', .:�.;� 1� . ..... .1 -'---1-1-*-'--'--- ::: ,:,: ::::: :.-'1:--1.,.::.. . . . * . I ::::.:.:.:.;. ...... ... .. .. ................ ..... I -� ,"................... ::::::. .. . .. .-:..:........:--.-,.-,-:::-�--:." .. .. --- .::..,.,..,..:.-*.:.,..l.,..:.*-.,:...... - '-� - .---- .� . � .. ------- , . .. ... ...., .. ....................�....... . : - i 11 �: -L I :.:.,:,. .... -:.. :::: ....1. (��,\ I I I I '�..,..:..,..:.,.,...*...:.-,...,..:...,..*-.::...,..:...,..::�..�..'. I � :.- ..��.:.::.::.::�. ,...:::.*..:.-,...*..:....*..,..*...,...:..*....,-.:.*...:.�..*...:- :--.'�`--*--'- V. � �. 0 . - .- -. . :::. ::.....r........ ;.....:..,............:- -�; / I I . .: ::...:::..�::�..::�.��:::::.:�::.,::::::::�::.,::.::::::::.,:� :: ... .. -�--`--..:..::-----.I / : bc I .`."`.`.`.`.'. S��-:-::-:--� .. �......... .-..-.........�:,..., --*.-.,..*.::.*...:::..*.-.*..:.:.., . --:.-.'.-.,.::..,...,..:...,.:.,-.:.*..*:':.-. ': , .:.. .4.. .....:.:.:��-�.::- .. .... -- .' . .. ....:........... .. .*:, .:. ...... .:., .... . .-- - . .. .. .:: I . ................:.- ... .... ...... . ...: . .. I i .,:.......m1:-1--.. - * � ::,..*..*.*.*.�-:-...-...-...-......,........�-.....-....-.-.--..---.-..-.--.----.-.-..-.-.-..-.--�-.,.-..-...-..---.,-. ..,.-`.-`::...,%Fi . . . -'-.1'--* � I ... j /I // I .....� .. � :i.,.'-*.,..,...,....,...,....,.,..,.*7:�. .�-.--------,---.--- - - ::::...::: �-..:- -:-:-.*..:..�:.:..,..:::.:.*.:.�.: :: .. - A m;;--:......�.-:---:...:::....::;...:::. ... - � � , . -:-,��:�:::::-,��::::�::- ::-::::. �:-*-:.:.-�:.:.:-:.,. �.........::- - . .. . �.,.+ - . ..: .:�. :.:: .. I . . :..;.-::::...::::�l:::::...:::-:.-:::.....::,--.,.,..,---..,...,...*....'.**..l..*"..'...'...,: . - .:,:,�.:::..:.:.:.:.:.��....*.:.....'.'.. ....."..': . : ./: 7".*..�.*'..*.*.'.-.'...'.-.*...'.**-,--�*...*."-.,.'.'...*...'-.".'..,---*..'.'...*..'-.",.--.'..'.....,....�.'....--.'.'..--'..'....'..*..*..,.,'.'.'.-'-'.,.'-,.'."...'.*..-*..'...."",--'...'.-.'...'*.*.*'.*-.'..- � . .............. ,� - . :-�-::,--� ..:................ -:: ...- -_---.:::.: : I � -:::...::.; - , .� .. . ................ ........::: ..-..-.-..- .. I � 1 1. - ..: .. .. ::: ,...::: .. � �...*..,--.'..-.'--.'.,.*.-.'.*'.*"*-'.'-.'-'-.'--*-'.'--.�*-'.'-'.*--.*-'-*-�'.*-'.'--..'-'.'-**-'�.-"-'.'.-.-*-.*-*-.*-'-'---*-.'-'.*-'.'-'.*-.-.-.---.--- -.**`.'.­­.'.*' - -,-,.,.-:.. ..., W:....:. :....:::....:..... - - .........,............ -.-..-...-...-.-..-.-....:-..'.......-.....-.-..---.--..--..�...:.-.,....--'.-..-'..-'..-.---'.--.':*-'.'-'.*-.'.'-*..-�.*-..--':-'..�.'..-*..-.'-.*-'..-*.*.-.'-��.,.,-*.,..,.,-.,...,....,..,*�....,.--..,....,...'.,.-.,.,.� -'. . . � . �.,.,...... ...�..._. _ , . ,*--. '' �.....-�.-J.....I-.-�.-.--.....--.....-.-.-..-- .. ..:......--i..... .............. .: ...,:.' - ...... -; :�:...:...'..:: .- ..��:�::.*..:.-*..:.,-.::�.:...,...,...:�::. :- ............. .............. - .. . - -, - I ---. : . : . . . ..: . .- ..-- - - `­" "' , . .. .. I ...........0------,-------,--------- """, ,"' ...... ......... ...... ...........-..-..-......�.4-......--....-......-.-...- ---------------------- -----------...-- � - ... . . . . - - - ......-..--.......--...��...-.....-...I.,.......- . . I / . -. . . . .. - ... - - -------- .. ----�� ......�,,�'.-*..'..-.-**....'.-',.*..-'.-'*.-** ��--*------.-.--. 'm....... � � I .. . -:. I ... ... .� , ..:..�::..::::.....,:.-...,.-*..,...*....-.--.*..,...,*...-....-...-.,..,-..,...,-...-....,........,.......-.....,-...*.,.* ..'.-.' .,." R.. . � I - . ...... ,*-."- - *.. ....*'*,*",,.", . m ..� 11 . -:: * .. ....... . .....",""'I"'I". �*-,--------*-,-,---,- .. . .- - .. .. .. -. .... . � ::-�-:-�...::�-:-:-': .. - - :- ., '.............. ............ ...-------------------- ...:a ;.. . .................-..........�.....-.....-....::: * ::: .-'.-*::.-.--.- :::,:.''. ..... � ...... - .-".-*--.-*---,--*--,- - - - :� .. / . ..-.................--.....'...., ..::::...:::;..:::.--.----'--.".* -.'.'..,'.,..�.-.*�*..*.,.'.,.'.'...'-::::*.*:.i"":::::*.,:::g:*",i:::*,::::,...,:*.,.,...,..,.,.. :::. -;-:::,.. .............-.......,.- ... .... .. "****"'--.- - - - ... ...*,*.'.��..--.--..-...-...-....-..--.--...-...-..-....-..-.-..-.-...-..-....-....-.-..-..---; .:::: � ::. . .....'. - .. - : .,* * .. .-:.�-:�::-.,-.-::-..,::�:-:: .,I..... ......... ...- ... ... I I I j I .1. .. , - - ...... - ----.-------g�. ::.. ... I ... . ....�.- , ` "- .'*-.'.' -'----'--- -*-1 .. - ... .. .... . .. . -..---:. -. .. .:. -*. "' * - - - ..". . ....' .. , ...,..*....'.-.'.....,*.*.,-'..- .'..**'-'-.'...'...*.,.'..*'....*...'�..::.,:; .... '.............. r. ---. .................:� . .1....-� -� . ..... .. .-,.,.-,----,.*.-*.- ..... .... .... .. :::. . "'.. V.. .�. V. / / I I "'.I* * ". -p-............-.-.----------�-.---. -.---.�-.-- .. ... N..... ��::- . ... �-:L9-:- ......... .. . I I I . I :.-i ...-*.�..-*..�--, .'..'.....*..�.....-...-.....--.�..,..-....-..-..-...A..........-..--�..,.. .*....'.....*.*."--*.....-.....*.":,*..�*..-.'..".*....'...'..'.....*.*...,."'...'.---'...".,*..,.'.�.'....*..,:,.,., ... ... ......-....:::::, ::-,.-,�--,.-::--.,----:--*-: :. ���. """"."..."--------"-�*--*'.'-.'�.'.'.*-'..'-.*...*...,...*.,*..".'-..'-�.'..'-**-.*-'-.'�'.*-.'�- .*.*-.*-'-.*'-'---.'-..'-..'-..'-**-�..*-..*-..:::,-.-.-�::�--'...'.*.*.,.'..,--..,.,..,-., ... ..... .....:-.-.-.::--.,-:--,.-:�::..'. ...:.' ::. .....�.......�...........�... .-:.. .:.....'. ":;... / .........::,.::-,-1.'-1.--,.--.*--.`- :.*-..-.'.-'-,.-..-..-.--..'.,-.'-..-..*.*..-'---.,.,--.,..,..,. . ..., .:....: .*:,---.-.-: --'-.*'---*--*---,--.,-::g- ..-...-.-.--..-..--.-.-..-..-...-....-.-.-..-..-....-.-.-..-.--..-..-.-.-..-�.-....-....-...-.--..-..--.--..-..-.....-.- .:... .... .... 1- -- ..- . , , - ** - :q ::: ......S�-*-:: :.---.-:.-.: ... --.- ::-- .. - I , i., -'� -`*- , � - . . . . .. - .. .-:.::.:: . / *.'.*-,*-- -,..* " I..". . -;.-,::...:;;....:::.-.-..--.--.--.- :�::. .... . . , ..................,..*..-......*..'..*........,--...'...�.- -'--.'�::k7::::--- ,.,..:::::...::.L:.*..'..*.-'.-*.e::;...::. . .. ... .. .-:. . I �, 'I ;..:::�.......*..,*.......�...................... -----:::�m;:::- '*...................*"**'*' .... - . - ... :.*.. ::.[...�:...... -, �4. I. ..... ........'........ ....-..-..-.-.-.-.-.-...-.-.,.......-.-.-.---.--..-..-----'.-.--.....,.-......-.--.-,.*......-.....---.-..-.- ""I"*..., - ,... ... �.........�........................:::..... �., ..,. I I I I :m....::...�,..... .. - . . ....... --....,.............-....--............. ................-.....,.......................-��--.'...'....,.'...*..-.'.--.'...'.......'....,*'�.- ,:::--�.:�::--.,-:�: - . :..... . .:. . V. � ........ - _, . .... ..:.*: I :-.- -: . - -, / , . ..... .;.... . .. a ... .;... : .;... : .;... : .;... : /� - - .... .. :::::mw:::: �::. 3: / 6 % /I � m ::::-.-:::: :::�:...1-:::-,..-:: :-�-/I I I I 1i . ... ,.: : = I .*. :.....:.....�...�:��,��...�.:.-� * .m..:... . ::.... 00 , . ,: :: - / � � ... :����� .�� �� 0-I ... ... :::.... �� U) �� , ::::---,.-,-: ..�� ....�...:�..� :.....:. ... I .:..-y.-....�. �..: : .:.:.: ..- .....:....,... .* ..... . - - - '.. -� � ...- 11 .1 . ... ���..-... * . ..:.i... "" , ..-..,.*..' . .... *i- I I :*:-::�:.. ..... .. . .....� : .... ,, -17=L .... ::,..,:.*.-.:./...:...,.,.--.�..*..-[.-.,.:.-.,..,...:..,....,.::�� :::. .....-...... . . . - ­ : .. .. . . . . . . . . . .. - ­ . 1: I I . . . . . . . . . . . :.:; .. ... .. - . . :, ,, . . . ,/// ., , - CD :,:�.. - .. -,.: -. :..:...,..,..,.-.,..,.--.'.*..,..'....'....'-...,.-I..'.-'....'..'..,..1.1.-'.-'....'*..,..*...'...*..'.- ,�, . ......:.....-............ :-:---/--.--.-- , ...-.-..-/-.. :::: z 4"SS :: :� -�. ... . —� , I — ..- ....I ..1.-.-,..... ... ,,�?,........:.-..-.-.-.�..-..:.-..--.-- .: ...�. ..'r. ////,// / H--,-t - � s....... ... . ., -!.' / ...�..�.:�- LLJ :-,-,-,�-"--7::7.R.,---, --.-.-'--`-,--,*-,-.'-.'-- ..... ------7 -- �-.---�, .:.*' ...:-.�- : I �- - .:. -------T- ----.---�--.. I .k.. .- ..... - :i,..,.:,..,.,.::...,..,��..:�.., .: - ........ �� .. ....... ... ... I /� ......... �. ..."..:�.::�� .... . * .. < I .-:;.. .. �.... .�:��:���� ���::�.**� �..::���: - <�- ......�. 1 ,1 , ! 1.�� :::� / .---'�� ����:�� ///// �Z, a , .,.,;.-::...:..,-..,�....:.".,.-..*...*-.:.-- :- I ..*. .....ass:....O�S : -:��:-� :::�- �-:�:�- :�:::���:��..-:--.,--.*-.'--. , . I / I (r) -... I :: -.-.:.:--.-. :::: . i.i............". ::��:: .. I .... ,, ::............-..� . --D . . - � -::: ; .�.....*�:� �:::����: � :::���: ��:�.����� � -----) I ....,.�--j / .�� ... . /,� ,� :.:.:.: - I ',� -, ij'�**::�:� ��::��:��:� ��:::�� ..�...�: ..�..... ..�..-. �-*.--:---*--�.,-::--- ��.:: "'T .�� � .... :::... ... . : .. I ::: . / � .,.�-� :::��� ���::��.. �:��::��.: ..%...�.. I I ... ... .: -- ::: . 11 .......:...........�.. .::: I m... ,�--' ... , . M � mcmi '-1 s-. ::: I I i . �.�. - -- I I ::: ..:. ::� .\ - .1- (0 N � � I ..... ", I .%....., :::77: :�� I 11 ,�--�-.--: s I Z) ,q- ... . I '.".....%. , I j / I , -:.. I I... .............. .. '...... - ..... I I I Ir .... .� I �D , :,-:.- .... ..,.....%...,. :...:...... .,....:..:.:.............,.:.�... . - I = , : . : I .......:.., �:�::..�... :. 1, I ..: . . " .:,, :... : :. : :::. ....-' . -** .�..� :.:::: .:.:. I 0c I 11 � -:: ... '* 4. - ......-..., ...* ....:..:--� �� �::�� �::��::�� ::: I I , I � . 11 I : LN4 I . I :: . . .......................'. ..., ..... I :� 11 � ... :: :.:� .. ............ .. - ... -.. I I , `-,,-�-: . / 7:: -I..... ....................., ..::.-::����--.:�--*--: ....����: . ::-..,. ,. [-------------i L- �, ... � ............. .... . ::�.�:........... . 1 I -,.-.� .. . ::::. :.: -.:-:::::.:::........... ......--:;- -.:.........::..... . :.�...........:..:.... I -1 : .. .:: ...... ... . - � :::::::..:. ... .....�........ ... - -.........::.�*......�.:..%......... -.. I I , - -T.-J11F.11111 mi - ,, . . ..:............4......... I *: . `,--*--:--,.--.-*:-*--*--,.- . I �... . , . .IP1.1.11 . - ............,...- .......... I I -- I .. �. I - -::-::'--'--*.--::.-,,, __ . -... a... W.....:.....:4. ..:..........:�-:- . :.-:.:�... ..... I 11 _ � I /1111 I MW ........ :.: ... 7`�.p.....III! :...".'..,..:.,....'.. ....,*..-.'�.,.:�..,....�....�..,.:...,..:.,. I : .. . / .... - .. -, .... - .... a--"-- 7- I , I I . :..... il.-I ..� .... .. ��/ ..'. . " ..."'.., -... *�",, A. ...............-.....-..-........-...: .". -,-,--,--,-:-.,..-`-':'-."--,-.,----, ---*---.-*-:-.-,-,-`.::*....:'...*.:...,.,.::........*.,.::...*.-.:.-..'..:---.--*-.,-,---*- LI *.. I I ...: , , ...'..-."..'.'...'....*.*..,.'.'.--'..-'-..'...'...'.."..'..�.*...'.'...'-,.,.,.-:.� ::-­:---.,.,:--:., .......... -." . ..... ... . -... -- �--,.: .::... -� -:- ... � ..� - - , -*�-. : -�--.*:.-,--,--:--.:--.-.... . ..... -71-,I ... .. - - - I �: .:... - -.1........S�m--' /..7--.--:--.'--.- * - - - .. ..."....'...., -�--. ..*** .. - , r__r ............. , - - .............. .. ...�.� .::- .....: -:....:-m I-'s..'...", ..,-,-,-.,.,----.-,-:-,----,-.-`-,--,-, -,-,-,-,--,-,---,: "I :::., . ... -.....:. .. - .. ... .--,.,-------.--::.-:: ... ... . '. ........ - - "... .,..:.., , t / mm � . ., ..... .... ... ... ....."' , -: - ...... , .. / , :1..'--.'-* -:.� - ... - .. - .-.::::..:...................................... *.. - .,..,: m.m.. , ... .-::.-,.: F. .,.:-,-,-,.'.,.' ....I /�/ I I I I I %'. .: . . -� -� .... , I ..: -:., .......... � :,..,,...,.:,.,.::.*.-.**..,."-*.-.'-.*-.'*-.'.*..'�-.*.'-.*-.'..,............... - - . .... ...... .............�.� -- �, �,/, 1, j I, ,. , : , . * :.*.*.*.*.,.,..*...'..*..'...'-.,.'..,.'..'...*..*..'.,.*..,.'..'-..'....'--..'..,.*.*.'..,*.,.;::.:.:..... �. ................... -... ......... -.- ...... ,-, *- I I .. .... . ..:-,...,..,-.:.*..:.-.,...,-,:.*..,..-.'.-.':.,.,: ..:..::...........---,-.-.,-,-.,--'.---'--,-,:--.,----.' I - , .......... . .... ......, - . .:. .-.�: ,**""""*'*'*'*"*."""***, . ....- -- -......... * ... ...:.:.:...:,.:,.::,.-,.:.,..::*...... :'. - .. , - .. :; ............ .:�.` -:*:::.,.*:*.,.:.,..::., : .'.. I .:::: .......:........... .. . - - � .... .... .. ::::: .::... -- — ::� . . ... ...... .. : - :.,..-.:.,..:...,..*.-.:...,.,.::.*...,.--:.-'..-"...,.-.,.-,.- �............... .-'..-:..-.,..:..,.,..,:.,..., :..,...::..,..,�,.,..,....., :..,...:...,..:�..'..'.-'...::..,.,.:..,...,.,..,.:.,-..�-'...'. ....'.....�.,- I : — ....:..... -:............. .-....................................................-..-.-...:: .... , ..'. - ....I ... .........:::.... ��:�, -1-::-.-�.,.-" �--__,� I I..-. �. ... ---, -,--**'."' .. . - ---� ... ...........� I I -F , - \ ""', - '"'I""I""',.'*."'.'-.* ..::: ".."."".` ... ".- . . ".......1""..."'...*----.-..-,... . . W / , � .,;-"."....,...*....."..,.'.'..--.'.....*.,.'.'....'...'.-.'...'.**.".'-..'...'--..'..*.'.*.'.......'..*--...'.,-'.'..'.-.....*- ..." -,- .. . ........ ...... - .*-.-..`*�'.'..'*.'11 -, � ....'.................................,- .. ............... ....... ..... ......:.....:...........-..-.-.-...'.::...'.- �'-.-':. �.. .. ... .. ::. .. // .............................. ............ . .. - . .. . 4 ..........: -,..........'....'... �................... - .. I_ - - - - - \ - * ..:::(..� ...... ...� : ��;. 1! -I / ; " ..*.,.,.,.,-,."".**""-'-"-"-'*'-.." ...,-- ", - .... ::,: . �'.-,.::::;.. -,--.: ".,..".,...,.....,.::.,.�..'.'.-.':.'...'.:...,.,.::.......,.,.,.,::.'-.".:.-.'.-.: I �1, -. .-...-.-...-....-.--.-'.....-.-.-'.-..-'..-...-.'.'.---.-'..-.'.-'.-::.-.-.--..:::......- ""I" -----:-..:.,..::..,...,..:....:.-,:.,...:.-,....*- �,� 11, ,- � , - . �-::::.- - - . ... ..""'..." �---,-,--,:-,-.,-,--, - I - -::::..::..::.,.:::::::::::..........,..-....--..-.---.....,....*..,...- -.-*--'--.'--.*--::.,-*.,--:-,-,....,.-., :::w " I "*-, -�.,-.,-.,: Al I I -'*.*.'--..."-*."- - *, - , - - �I a I ,-,`--�-.'- --,--,---,---,--,-,.,-,--,.-.::-.-- - - .1,*---,-`-*-,-*-,--`-,.-,.-. . . . . � , / -,,�.' - .-::::-.-::::,-: ...- : . ... ..,.-,.--.,--.'.....-.....-.....-�.'.-.-.,..,..-.....;. --.. *- '.... . .. . . /// I ..'.."..*..*...*.'.,.-,...'.-.*...'.-...'..*.,..*.'..'.--.'....--......'.*.'..,...*..'..*...*.,..- .:.... ... .. 11 / *-- ................... .::::;.:: .. .. . ..... ............. .. �k-—-, \:- � .. . .......... .: IZ . ------.----.1--:--,-,-,:-.'.'-"-.*.'-'---.*.'.-.'.'.'-'..'-'.'�-'...'-.'-.'-"-'*-.'.-.'-..'-..'-..'-.*.'-.'.'.-'...--..-.-..-..-........-..-.........................-,*.,.-* ,:-'-'--.- . . . , ... �u ............................ :::**.,.,-, ...:. - , �,, - ..... ... ...- ....,........... . - - . - ..... . / --- I :--,--1.1".."I"',-:::� :,.,.:**,*.:-,.*.'...:.-.,...,..:.*..*..:.-,....,-.:... .:.-,...,-I.....,-.:..:::::... ," .1 I I .: .':.'...:-'-' \�- I ,p -, -, ... // " ��.*-.*.-'-.-':-'-.,----,:::.,....-.,....,-..,.,.,."..,..,....."...,..."-*...,--.*...,...,...*.,.,...*..,.--*...,.....,...,-.,.�..'..*.*.,..'...*.'...'..'..'....-*.......-.- .-.--------.----...'...r.....::....-.: - .-.-...I ,\, / , - - < 3: j b) .�.-.-,..-'.-.'--.'-.'-...: -.,. - ... .. - .::...- ..-I*-- -.......................... ,� / --�,,-, -:--.�-.-- .1, , , p- I I / I..�... , I ''.'.'*..,..*.*..'.'.�...**,.'-..'-.".,..*...*- . .... - ... - , ', I - �:,..'--- �,..,..-,....,-",.,*.,..,...*...'.-.'-.,.."..,..,..-'..-*.,.'..,..,.--.,....'--.'.-.'.*.*.,........*...*.:..,...--....,.-.....,....:.-.'.* ::: .. .. .. . . - �.*...,..,.-*...,..---....,..,...* .. ..-:.-.-.-:.--*.--:--.-.:-*.-,.--:- --- - � = / �t , .:"...., .'.'*..'., "...--*.... .. ...... ................. .... - .. .. ... \�,/ . .. .. .. .. cf) - -.......-.--------*.---,.--� .... . ....... .. :::' ':: -:.,.---:.*.-:-,.-:,., ....:.,......................... I , Al............- , . .... . ,�, , r. ....,-.I.-� . I 11 I. 11 ..... .11... .. .:...-.::.-::--.-.-:................ ,.777��:;7-- . / CN - j - ." .1-1-'.-.*-.`.*.`---.*... ...... I ., .1 — n.- - ------.......F........................ .--.- - 1'� � . ..:�..... .; ," I I . - .. ... ......*.-1--'.--'.--'-:......: ... ..;. �C L / . . 3 - .......::....... 1"', .............��*--'. ...' .. .. .::. , -- ...."*... ..... I / : . .*'.'.' -� .. ...... ... . - - I i-- � .....,:..:- -- � - .:..:::.;..:::...::::...:: , * , ..:-, -:...I.... .. - - / - � ..;:...:... .. .��;......:.... , ',I- :��!��i......-:.. . ,-,....:.-,....::....,..:...,.:.,-.:.-.,.:.,..,:..,.::.-..*..:.*-'....'..:.-'..:.*-.:. .. , . ... I �- -U1:,-. m...... ............... . ... ....':�,���:. ....- '... ...� . ... , :W 'I / U) � 0 .. "*;",*:"'--.-:- :.,.,.�..,-.::..,:..,*..:.-.,.:.,-.:...,.........:......:.............:.-.,...,..:.*...,..:.-,....,..:......:.......:....:...:.-.,.....::�:...:,.-.*....:�.....,-.:....��:�.:: :.:.:,- " // "- , - 11 I -� .-.:.. :-::: ..,;,-. .. .. ::... ..... . . , I � " � I .... ..:...... ... .... ":.:. .-,.-::----.-.. ...I .:.. , .. ..:: ...: :: - . - , 1 I 0) . .." .. - ....:.. ::: . 1 � I // 0 C) - - .. :,.:��:.-.,...*..:.-.,...,.::.......:.-........:....:.-.......:.....��...........::--..'::.--..-- --�,/ ,_%:: 1, " " , 11 / - - LU , Z :...-�.,..:..,....,.,.,:.�:..,.-.:.-'..-*-.:.,...,..:...*...,-.:.,..:...,..*...:....,..*�....,. , - , ,::.. , , ..I m....:.....:..:..:.,.,;.::..::..........:...,.,-.:...,...,..:.-,....,-,..'...:.-,....,.,:, ""*,--,';�-*.. ...................:----:-� , - ;�, , 1. / -- .. .-.- ... ......:.::.--.,:-,-,-�-:. ...... 11 1, .; 11 . ,::*..:.,....'... .....: - - - 1. -�:,.--,.- I / I :::.�,--:-.,-.,:--*.-- - ...:: . ..............�*..:.-.,�.'-.-....--..-..-.-,:.*...:.-.'.-.'.-.'.,:.,..:.-,..-.'..:..... . I 1 2 "I I/ ': ..:. ... . - --:r::.-::.. .: .. .. .- --*- ...: - ��-::..�.--ma-.---.�- ;1 � .. =) I -*.-.*-.-,-::::-*.'-:--'.- ...::.- ... 1,--,::-,-,.-.-:.. .... --:::��:L�-:_ 1, .. :;,: ::-, - --,-:-.,1--*-.,-:-,.-.` - -, - :.. � ... .. ... -::::-:: - I- � , I ,.. -�- '�'� ...... ......:::.-.'.-.*..:....,..:::,::.,...- , - -* -.*...-.*., mI;"..::::.�-.--..-.-.:: /-.-.-.-*.-::: I . ...�.:m-.--.--:---,-:.*--:.-'.-..'.::.*..'-.'--*::.,...:...,.:.,-,...,..-:...,....*.::.,...,-.......:.-..-'--:.-..-..:- -.,-.-:..-.--:- I 1. .:..:.... .,: : .. � "�� , :--:-,-,-, . .:...�:.::..,.....:,.,.*::..,..: ........ .. - - , - -�-:1.,.,:,*..%-.: . --:-`..-, :.,.*.,-.,...,...,..:..*...-.,...,..:.-,..,-,�.,...*.--:.-.'.-.-,:.*..:.-.'.-'.-.:.*..,..:..-......:- ---.:.--:�-::.--:.:.,..::�� _ *-.:.-.,..�..-..:.-.,...,..:..*..:.-,....,..:.-,...,.-.:.......: :.-.:.-..-. .. .. / I I .. .:..:. . .,.-.:..*..-.'-..-'.:.,..,......::::.*....*--:.-'..-.*-.:..*.'.:.-.'.-*...:...,..,..:..,....,..:.-,..:.:::......'..*...:...,..,..-�.*.*..:...,...-,:.*..:.-.'.-'.-.:.*...-..:...,...,..:..*...: :"::. �... ---TRI - / , / // I :, . .... .. .... ::.- IIWTI a = � MORIN � / / ,- P/00 APN 0207-044-30 ., ....::.--.,:.* ...�...,-.:.,..:...,...,...,-.:...:.-,...,.-.:...,.*.-,:..,..,.-.:..*...,-.:.,..:...,..*...:.-.,..,..,:..,.-.:..,..**-,:.*...:..,..-: - (.) // ::.. ...... -:............. .::. ...� ...- .... ........ .- ... . 1. -11, . " "I I / . .:-�--.*--.--.-.*--:: ..: . ... I ...- I -- .-::: ..-.... I I -- / / / .. I 'I I �. ". . I - ---1 . I .-:.,:.'-'-*.-:-, :... , .:. ... .... �..I- �] �, " :.- I -- / / / .1. �/ � / ,,-..-.-.-.. . . I : ............I - I --- ---- / / .\-..:.-..: - < (r. : .. ---- --......-.:. ...:.i..�j, I ,-- - I � �, � V, / � :.::::. - - �'.....:...::.: . 11 � � � I / / / oc / 1� :.:. - -:........:.....: *- .. .. . \---- /11—�, I � I I I . A, �, -, I- -,�- I I� 11 / I F— i -.. ......::..-. -.- ---.*- -..,' .-.. ..*.*'.,.............- . . ::,":........., -�-, -, � , I , , -- --- --, I I / / / , ... ..U. -- -:::::..:::: 1. � , .... . �.:::*: ..:..::.-...:.�....::..:�.,...*-.�.':��;...:.-.,.*� 1. - I -- , ,� . , .- �:--,--*--::.......... .:.*" , . . : :.,: .. . .- -- , I z . . .. . . * , , ... � . . . .. -.-.-:.-....:.-..-: .:::::::-- .. . ..,........... \---- ',- , I I , -- I - .�-- .:-.,.:,:.*.,:,*-.,:�-..,..,*..:.,..*::,.... ] "'--:. ...%.. . ::� � . " I " -- ---- / . :..,:.,..-.,::�:.*-..,:.,*.:.-.'::...,:..*,:,.-.,.:..�'-..':.*-.:.,..*::.,--.-.. .......... :::.:::: 1-1 / / ,::::.�,'.-'.-.:...,.*.-,..*..:.-.,...,.,:.*..,..:..*..-.'-*:.-,.....*..*...:.-'..-*..-.-,:;....:::.-...,-.- .: .. .... ... - I .j I ��.....:..-...:..:..::.......:....�..::....:..:.....� --'.--:--,.-:... .. ,.--:::--*.--� :* :::---::m-- .,. �ki. I ,- I j I , 1,-� JI z // / // / / .... . ...... ...11 .,..-.:: - � � I L�� "z <5-) / :.,.,-.,...*..:.-.'.-*.::..*...,-.:..,....,..,:..,..:...,..*...:..,...,..:.-,..-.*-.:....:.-,:..*..:.-.,....:, , .. -- -.— ... ... .. - ......-11 ...- ..... I.. _- mm-nd mmm I - �� / /- 1� . -:.*-,.--:.-,- ..-:i.-: ,.....- .. ,--:-,--:..::�: ::.- :..:.:: , - .*:.,:.*: -.-.,:---.-.-:.:1*-�-�- .. / / .... . : .... :. -- :: .. ..::. . - .--:� .-:-*.*,:-.:-.. ............... .. -,.:� :-*.--.*--:--.-:--,.- . .:: . . - - . q< --�, .:* ...,.,:--.-*.--.'.-... �. / / I : / -,..,::.-.'.-.*...,-,...,-.:..,...,-.:....:...,..*...:.-.,...,.*.-,...*..:.-'..-*.-...*..:.-.,..*..- - :.-,...,........... . . I I .. - ,..::..-.. ,.::�....:: -:.-...::.-:-.- ...: . ... .. / / I / .....,:.,......:........::............. :: ..,.-.:.,�'.--'..*..,:.*..,..:..,....,.,:.,..,.:..*...:...- - - :: .: : � .: ::..... -,.-:.-..,.:.-* -� - X / I I .. :--.,-*--,:-*--,--.,--.'-. ..-:.-,.::::.-;:.-::., -::.��-::-��....��:.-..-�..��.���;�..-...�.:;:.��:�...�:��..,:��.-.:...:��:....::. z I // /::. ...... * - : �.:: - - , --- ... ::" .. .. - - .....- .: --.--.: ...-.:...-.:.-....*..:.--...-....--.. .... ..... . — ..:.-.:..-.*-.:.,...:.-,...*.�..-,...........-..::�..-..:...-.-.- : ....... smH - .Z.::....-....�' .........:.....:...:: .. . �� .. �.� // � ...... * - / --f- - .. �� -.. -,., .: ....'i. * - ...- . . /,. : - .:..,.* , .. ..' .-.'.*.-,..,..,.-.'.-*..-.-*..,..,.:...,..:.*..,.:.....*..:..-...-'..*.,.-'.-.-...:.,.�!.!.r..:... ........,.. .. :� - .. . .. . . ,z ... ...::�:..:.:..::... ,***::,.: ... a... ::... .:............. . 1', .:.-.,.:.,-.,:.*...*.-....,.::...,..**-:.'-..'.:.'-...-..-.,:..,.::.-.'.-.-:".'-'..-*..-:.-..-..- -----! �'..-.....*....�..*...'..'-...*.....*-..,:",,.. / c') � .. . .,. -:*-,:-*.-.*-:-,j.-*..:.�. . ....: // / / ( ...,.--.,-,--:--.,:-*.--: .... ...�*::.*..:.,-...,..*..:.*-.,:.*.'.: ....,*.:.'-.��.::*.-,. -'... : :..-'..-'.-'..'.*.-'..,...:....*..... -. . -- .,--:--.'--.*--.---:--:--.. . '1-:-.,-,.-:--`:,.* -,-,--,---,-.*-::-.,-.,- / ....-----------.--:--..--.--:.\-- �:.. .....::.. ... - .*.*.' - . ... . . ., 'Z I / - .. . - - .. - :*.* ....-;::.---:.i:. z z / ! / , - .. -�-` .. ..:........ :., - .� / .. *-, - - * ,,,, , - . . , / / , ..... .... ..... .....:.-.,..,-......,..:...*...,-.:.....:..,...*.-.:.-.....:..*....,-.:.-*..*.-.'..'..-'.�,.'.-,.-...,..: ..... .:::-, ...-...., -.-.--, --:---,-,--:--,.--.,--:......... .. :.- ..:-, ` -�/ --") / , / - . .. :.-,...*..*.-,..*..:.-.,..,.--:.�....:: ........�. :. :.*. I ... ....,...,*....:.,...:.*.'-.**!.*.�� .. 3: / il �z i::.'-..-'-..'.:.**.,:...,.�.-...:.-...-...:.--..-..-.:..-...-..-:.-.-.:.-....-..:...,..*..::..,...,..:..*..-'.-.:.,..:.-.,...,..:.-,....:...:..:.::,..,.:::..........- . . ..-.-:. , .- ....... . ::.- ...:.. .. ..---..,::. !���,------> I / A I . . ..z;...-:..m. ..- -� - * - :.,..:....---�---,., - . .1... -:: -.'. - .::.:: . I � / I - .. .:.. ..,.:.:.,..1... 1. .... ...� - --- I * , .--. ..:::*:.'*..:-.,.::*..*:,..,.:.":,.:..,.* -..-..-..:.-.:..,.,� . I.. :-.. . .1. . .-.-.:...: .-.-.- .1 - - :: --'.-.,::-,-:.-,:.*:.--: :...::�:....:.-.'.-*..::...,.,...::.*..-.*-.:.-.,.:.,-.,:..,..:.-.,....::.*..,..,- .. I . .::.-:.,..::.'-'.'- --:-*.-,--,--,.--:--.,-: - �� ---- -*:,---*-,-,-,-:-.`.-.-- . . . .. ..- .... ... .. � --- ---- ,- ,z v �. , N*- ..:... ':...�. �- - ...............:.-.,..-.....-..-.-.:..*.,.,..:...,...,..:....:...,..*...:.-..: ::.,...:.,:.,.-. . . , �% , .... .-�--.--.--:--.. N :..:.:`--,:. :::...... . ,*-* .. .. - . ...:... .... .. - -, - .:� . . ....:.... ..: --.-�-�:.. . ::..,.,-,-*-*-,:: ,. .. .., '.' � , -,� , - - ".. ...:-*�.... .`-,:,:,.,. , ,� -, , ..--..'..'.,....:..*....,-,:.,..:.-,...,.-.:.-.'.**-,:..,...,-.:...*.-.,-.:.,...:...,..*.-.:......:..*....'.-'......, :.:. " . - .. , .............-ii. :.-�-:-:.-'..-.'...,.,:..,..:.-,...,.,*:.*..:.,..�- l.... ," .... . .: -i� - - .. - .. " - .:.....:.�..':..:.�... - , ,".:n� ..--�-:-:-:� .....:...-:.-.-. . ..... .... , ......� z i l *....:`:-:-" . .. .... . -.. : :"::: / '. .,:., - / . . - ::,". 1� .:...- I / �= .'.-'..*'.'....'..,:.,..,.-,�,.:-�.�- ..'--*.--: . .... .:. ... ............ .,.,.--,:., .. I �....::..... .-.---.-�l-,...*-.'.-..'.,:.-':�:::,.,..,:,:.'--'. ... . ..--,::.-.,..,-......::�,.-.,.,*.. . , .. .-.'.-.'--,--,--*.--::: ,-,:*.,-,:.*.,.:...,...,.l:.,..:.-,...,...:.*..*..:...,...,-.:...*."-.,:.,.-.:...,...,-.:.,..,...:-....::-- :..:�:--,- ::::]:.,:. . . .:. . . . . . :---. - ..........'::. .. ..*..:..,..:: -.- .... - .. -� . -... ...?"- ..' - , . � :- z z :...::�:..:... '.. � ... . �........ ........::.* �,�' Z / I .... . ..*:.,.. -.* -*. .-,..,.:.,..S..-,.:.,..,�-*.-:.-.'.::� - ( - � \ : .. ::�-*­ ....,.-.*.-:-.*-... . . . . ... . - .... ... ........'....i. -1- --.-� �----�-,---.�: :-4 -�*/ / .,-,.*.,.:, .., * ..", ....... . .. , .:-, �.. ..,.*..: -..: �'-----------. .......� , -- Q ........-...:..,.:..,-.:.-.,..*..,:.*...,.-.:.-'..-.*-.:.,...:.-.'.-*.-.:..,..::....,.--.*.-., .. .. -'.. - ..... ..-,..-.:.�.:.-.'...'.-.'-.:..*..::..:::.-'..-*.��.*...::..::: .-..,......::.-..::�..'-'- -,:-�-:.�--. .. ..T .. .. -- - .. ....:.-.,. ::::.....P.::: .. //,/ " " ,z .. .. .. �� , �....71 ... .... -.:. ��.:�: -'. - -,:. -: - --:--.-,:,.-,.-,.-'.-. '.'.'...*......'.. '.-*.-.*--::.'.� . 1-1 :1/ I/ - - - - , -:*,:-.-. ''. I .. ,..�..,-.:.-,...::::::.-.'.-*..- I*. ..., . 1. Z ,tp I , ....:.-:.,..:..,...,.-.:..,.,..,.:.,...,..:.,..*..,..:.-.'..*.--:-,..,...:...*...'--'..I ....--...:...,..,:.*..:.-.,..*.--:.--..-.-.:.--...-.-.:.-.-.-..-.�--:.-'..-.'....,..'..:.-...,...:.*..::,..,...-,.. --:--'.---.--.-.*--.- ---:--.----:--.'--'.--:--.'--.- .,.,..:...,...,......:.:-.:.*..,..,..:.::..,�:.- -11 ...:..::.* �:.-. .. .�" ,:.,.,:,:*..%?:*,.,.?. . . .. * " / / � � / ::,---,:-,-,-:-.`,:- ...... - - � ........::......... .-:......... .. - .:. ( �/ �, I/, ... I .�.:.,..,...,....-.....-.-......:..*..,.-,�..,..:.-.,...,-,:.-.,.*.-.:..*..-'-- ::.::"* , , - **--,- :. �\..--.- \ .. --::�:*.--:---,--,--::-:. --a- L- -:; ....:,.:.,...,:.,.,...,**.:.'.'.*..,.,:,. ':-..-....-,:.*..-.:..*...,-.:.,..:...,.....:.-....,.::....-.:..:.-.,:.*.-.:.-..-..:.::.- --.,:-,-,-, ........ - ....;.....:.- * . ........ \ .-... .. . - - .. .. .� ....... ....: . . �: .:. \ � - ...-. ... : .?... .::-\---.-:--,::::--:: \ // " . . .. -,:,.*.:.,.,*:.`.,.-:.,. :- .. -:., -::.-:-.-:.-.-:.::.-::. .:.. �... .., *:*,:-,.--*-:,:.,.*:`,.,:- - . -::-.--::----::�: .m I / 1 .. ...::,:....:.::: 4.. ....... .....-�-`-.-. - * � ....... :.:..::.*...,.-.:.-.'.-.*-.:.,...:.-,....*......:........... - . :.. : L. � /,/� �..% ..: .. - . -\-,- ..�- - :.::..:: . -.- ... -�-- - I... - .�- - / ::�- .w,- � Ik ..... .... ..:... ..-���:�-�: .... . - .. ,.:.::,**.*.-'.- '.-:.,:.::,..::::. ..:..:: ­+1­-7--�.. �---��-:'.-.:- ::...::.......... .*:.:.-. . .. �........ - - : — ::"::: . Y . - . ...,\ ..� . \ ­ .....1. N .:....:-:---�":-, . --::,:....: , NNON-f- :::::.-:::::-:::: ::.:::--::::::-::.,i ..... , * .* ..::.,.:�: \ _�.. " 'I, .. � ..... —- -� , .. — — — ... ...\.-.-:..- � ----:--*. Z� .. . :. ". " — 1. v I I .:... . ...— .. \ \ � \ �.-,!:;.; - I -- -- ::.*.*....: .,..*..,-.,..,.,..*-- : ..-:--1:,*.. \---- '\� ",'- \\\\ I.:.-,�* -:.....- 1-1 N, I MORIN :� ....................-.�......--I , ......... �. \\ \,�\ "''.....:.�..... . .� . .. .. .. .. ... .. . .. ........ . :.. . 1\ - �.-*.".. V. -X- .....--.- <`*:.:.:I- �', ..:..�....: � -- —.,-. �—�- -' — �1: 1-1 ��\, , \--\ � . f... I . . . bc — I- 1� '� -1 .�-,\ "I-- .. ,:�w*/ : � \ N, . '. , ,. . � N 0 33"01 if -, ."�.�.....-�I I - I- . .. ...." :,..:,..�........ : 1-1 ..:..:. .:.:., . .: - N, I � -'..:.� . . � :� , - ,.. .....z. 1-1 ,... - -� � I - �-- W/F -3 11.1 IN.N, I I 11-1 APN 0207-044-28 �: 0 = = 00 N I I � I I I I LEGEND 0 CUT/FILL LINE 10 5 0 10 20 30 :.,:.,:.,:.,:.,:.,:.,:.,:.,:.,:.,:.,:.,:.,:.,:.,:.,:.,:.,:.,:.,:.,:.,:.,:.,:.,:.,:.,:.,:.,:.,:.,:.,:.,:.,:.,:.,.,.,.,., :.,:.,:.,:.,:.,:.,:.,:.,:.,:.,:.,:.,:.,:.,:.,:.,:.,:.,:.,:.,:.,:.,:.,:.,:.,:.,:.,:.,:.,:.,:.,:.,:.,:.,:.,:.,:.,.,.'.'., .............................................................................. .............................................................................. .'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'...................................................,...,...,...,...,...,...,: .'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'........................................................:,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.'.'.'.'. CUT AREA ............................................................................... .............................................................................. ............................................................................... —1 �-1 i � i .%-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.I.I.I.I.1.1.I.I.I.I.I.I.I.I.I.I.I.I.I.I.I.................,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.I.I.I.I.1.1. .... I *............................................................................ .............................................................................. W �� I --] ..*".'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.............................- *............................................................................ .............................................................................. *............................................................................ I.............................................................. .*.,:.,.,.,.,.,.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'............:.-...-...-...-...-...-....-...- FILL AREA SCALE: 1"=19 :.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.................................'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.....................................- .............................................................................. .............................................................................. .............................................................................. '.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'........................................................................................................; 0 REVISONS ,? CIVIL ENGINEER / PREPARED BY: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SHEET I? ,qFESS/g/V -�, I 0 NO. DATE DESCRIPTION APP. T . 0,$' s, JOHNNY T. GHAZAL,P.E. DEPARTVENT OF BUILDING & SAFETY / PUBLIC WORKS c/) 0 1 0 PO BOX 7100 4 OF 4 Z3 -- -7 -zn REDLANDS, CA 92375 .) r rr, W 0. 6395 m PHONE: (909) 534-9875 PRECISE GRADING PLAN IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIE� cy-1 1�13 X X X X / X X X I / X I \�\ / '-1*--1 k" .� - � / �1, I I I I I I I . * * I--- PLAN *.,�Z- "I" 7563 ALTA CUESTA DRIVE NUMBER C/v 0- �\ ��� �,,�, Know what,s below. , . OF CAU\� ;� ���— Call before you dig. I I JO�NNY T. GHAZAL!'P.E. DATE CUT / FILL EXHIBIT I I RICE C76395, EXP. 12/31/20 1 1 1 DRC 2018-00160 DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:00 p.m. Mena Abdul-Ahad August 20, 2019 HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2018-01014 — RAMY IBRAHIM - Site plan and architectural review of a 4,040 square foot single-family residence with an attached 435 square foot garage on a 10,411 square foot lot within the Low (L) Residential District and within the Hillside Overlay District at 7563 Alta Cuesta - APN: 0207-044-29. This item is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA guidelines under CEQA Section 15303 — New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures, which permits the construction of a single-family residence in a residential zone. Site Characteristics: The 10,411 square foot vacant project site is located on the east side of Alta Cuesta Drive and north of Camino Norte, within the Low (L) Residential District and the Hillside Overlay District. The property dimensions are approximately 114 feet along the north property line, 106 feet along the east property line, 95 feet along the west property line, and 94 feet along the south property line. The downslope lot has an elevation of approximately 1,460 feet as measured at the curb face along the east property line and an elevation of approximately 1,455 feet as measured along the west property line, for a maximum grade change of approximately 5 feet from the west to east property lines. The site is covered in short grasses and is bordered by single-family residences to the north, south, east, and west. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning Designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Low (L) Residential District Site Vacant Land Low Residential Hillside Overlay District Low (L) Residential District Low Residential North Single-Family Residence Hillside Overlay District South Single-Family Residence Low Residential Low (L) Residential District Hillside Overlay District Single-Family Residence Low (L) Residential District East 9 Y Low Residential Hillside Overlay District Low (L) Residential District Low Residential West Single-Family Residence Hillside Overlay District Project Overview: The applicant is requesting to construct a 4,040 square foot two-story, single- family residence on the project site. The proposed grading includes up to 7 feet of fill which necessitates that the project be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission per Section 17.122.020.G.1.I. The additional cut and fill are necessary due to the steepness of the lot. Architecture: The proposed residence has a modern style design theme, which includes a standing seam metal roof, steel siding element on the west elevation, stucco finish, vinyl windows, and aluminum balcony railing. The residence was designed to be compliant with the Hillside Design Guidelines (Section 17.122.020.D.2), including minimizing view obstructions. The building mass is broken up through the use of multiple wall plane changes and the incorporation of exterior decks along the south, east, west elevation. Exhibit C DRC COMMENTS HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2018-01013 - RAMY IBRAHIM August 20, 2019 Page 2 The proposed 4,040 square foot residence consists of a 2,544 square foot first floor, which includes the main living area, garage, and two bedrooms and a 2,031 square foot second floor which consists of the family loft area. The second floor includes decks along the south, east, and west elevations. The size of the 4,040 square foot residence is in keeping with homes constructed near Alta Cuesta, which range in size from 2,400 square feet to 4,896 square feet. A two-car garage is located underneath the northwestern portion of the second story of the residence, with the garage door facing west and accessed by a driveway with up to 2 percent grade. Hillside Development Standard 17.122.020.C.1.d. states that driveways with grades up to 20 percent are permitted when they are aligned with the natural contours of the lot and are necessary to achieve site design goals. Low Residential District Code Compliance: The project complies with the requirements of the Low (L) Residential District. In steeper terrain (20 percent slope and greater), front yard setbacks may be reduced to a minimum of 20 feet from back of curb or back of sidewalk, whichever is more restrictive, in order to minimize rear yard grading. The development requirements are as follows: Development Requirements Proposed Front Yard 20' +/- 5' 25' Interior Side Yards 5' / 10' 10' / 23' Rear Yard 20' 26'-11" Lot Coverage 40% max 24% 30' limit within the Hillside 24'-10" Building Height Overla Hillside Overlay Code Compliance: The project complies with the intent of the Hillside Overlay District, which seeks to facilitate appropriate development of hillside areas. The site is a downslope lot with an elevation change of approximately 5 feet from the west to east property lines. Retaining Walls: The maximum permitted retaining wall height is 4 feet within the Hillside Overlay District, with stepped retaining walls permitted to have a maximum height of 3 feet with a minimum 3 foot separation between the stepped walls. The applicant is proposing 4 foot maximum retaining walls around the concrete patio to the east and west of the subject site. No retaining walls are proposed in excess of 4 feet and a minimum 3-foot separation is proposed between the stepped retaining wall. Perimeter Walls and Fencing: The applicant proposes 5 foot high perimeter walls along the north, south and east property lines. The north property line already has a perimeter wall in place. The proposed perimeter walls are in keeping with Hillside Design Guideline Sections 17.122.020.E., having walls that integrate the materials and colors used of the residence. The front yard will have a 30-inch accent wall. DRC COMMENTS HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2018-01013 - RAMY IBRAHIM August 20, 2019 Page 3 Grading: The proposed grading design limits earthwork to 480 cubic yards of import, which is necessary to construct the foundation of the residence. The foundation of the residence is stepped with the existing grade, with the upper pad at an elevation of 1,450 feet, in conformance with Hillside Design Section 17.122.020.D.1.a., to terrace the building to follow the slope. Building Envelope Analysis: Hillside Design Section 17.122.020.D.1.C. requires that residences in the Hillside Overlay District be designed to fit within a 30-foot high building envelope. The applicant has provided north-south and east-west cross-sections with building envelopes demonstrating compliance with the 30-foot height requirement. View Analysis: In conformance with Hillside Design Section 17.122.020.D.2., the residence has increased side yard setbacks to avoid the appearance of overbuilding or crowding the lot and to minimize view obstructions. Landscape: The proposed landscaping will be designed to comply with Hillside Development Section 17.122.020.F., including the use of drought-tolerant landscaping to protect slopes from erosion and planting shrubs to soften the views of the downslope elevations. The project is not within the High Fire Hazard Zone or within a wildland-urban interface area. A landscape plan was not provided at this time but will be reviewed prior to moving the project forward to the Planning Commission. Staff Comments Staff is in support of the architectural, site and grading design for the proposed 4,040 square foot residence. The project conforms with the Development Code and the Hillside Design Standards and Guidelines, including providing a grading design that balances the requirement to reduce cut and fill to the greatest extent possible and to reduce the height of the structure to limit view obstructions as seen from the residences to the north. The residence is well-designed and carries the design theme to all elevations, including providing wall plane articulation. The residence is stepped with the existing grade which further reduces the overall bulk as seen from Alte Cuesta. Earthwork is limited to 480 cubic yards of import and grading is limited to the area necessary to construct the residence, driveway and concrete patio area to the south of the residence. The proposed design does not require Variances or Minor Exceptions. Major Issues: None Secondary Issues: None Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Committee review the project and provide comments as warranted. If the Committee finds the project acceptable, staff recommends that it be forwarded to the Planning Commission for review and action. Staff Planner: Mena Abdul-Ahad, Assistant Planner Staff Coordinator: Mike Smith, Principal Planner RESOLUTION NO. 19-64 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2018-01014-SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW OF A 4,040 SQUARE FOOT SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE WITH AN ATTACHED 435 SQUARE FOOT GARAGE ON A 10,411 SQUARE FOOT LOT WITHIN THE LOW (L) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT AND THE HILLSIDE OVERLAY DISTRICT AT 7563 ALTA CUESTA DRIVE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF —APN: 0207-044-29. A. Recitals. 1. Ramy Ibrahim filed an application for the approval of Hillside Design Review DRC2018- 01014, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Hillside Design Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 23rd day of October 2019, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW,THEREFORE, it is herebyfound,determined,and resolved bythe Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on October 23, 2019, including written and oral staff reports,together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The applicant is requesting to construct a 4,030 square foot single-family residence with an attached 435 square foot garage on a 10,411 square foot lot within the Low (L) Residential District and Hillside Overlay District at 7563 Alta Cuesta Drive; and b. The site is bordered by single-family residences to the north, south, east, and west. The surrounding properties are all within the Low (L) Residential District and Hillside Overlay District; and C. The project complies with the requirements of the Low(L) Residential District and the Hillside Overlay District, including providing a grading design that balances the requirement to reduce cut and fill to the greatest extent possible and to reduce the height of the structure to limit view obstructions as seen from the residences to the north; and d. The design limits earthwork to 480 cubic yards of import,which is necessary to allow the construction of the driveway and foundation of the residence. The foundation of the residence is stepped with the existing grade, with the upper pad at an elevation of 1,450 feet, which is in conformance with the Hillside Overlay Design Standards. The proposed design does not require PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 19-64 HDR DRC2018-01014— RAMY IBRAHIM OCTOBER 23, 2019 Page 2 Variances or Minor Exceptions, and the square footage is compatible with the other residences along Alta Cuesta Drive; and e. The residence is in compliance with Hillside Design Section 17.122.020.D.1.e.,which requires that residences in the Hillside Overlay District be designed to fit within a 30-foot high building envelope. The applicant has provided two north-south and two east-west cross-sections with building envelopes demonstrating compliance with the 30-foot height requirement; and f. Retaining walls are limited to 4 feet in height or less, in keeping with Hillside Development Section 17.122.020.G.1.j. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan.The General Plan Land Use designation of the project site is Low (L) Residential District. The Low (L) Residential designation is intended for the development of detached, low-density residences on individual lots.The General Plan also provides a goal of facilitating sustainable and attractive infill development that complements surrounding neighborhoods. The project is for the development of a single-family residence on an existing residential lot that is complementary to the surrounding neighborhood. b. The proposed use is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. Section 17.36.010 of the Development Code states that the Low (L) Residential District is for the development of single-family residential uses with a minimum lot size of 7,200 square feet and a maximum residential density of 4 units per gross acre.The project site is an existing 10,411 square foot vacant lot that was intended for the development of a single-family residence. C. The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code, including building setback, building height, lot coverage, grading limitations and design. The project complies with the requirements of the Low (L) Residential District and Hillside Overlay District. The required front yard setback is 20 feet(plus or minus 5 feet),the required side yard setbacks are 10 and 5 feet and the required rear yard setback is 20 feet. The proposed front yard setback is 25 feet,the side yard setbacks are 10 feet and 23 feet, and the rear yard setback is 26'-11". Lot coverage is 24 percent, well below the maximum permitted lot coverage of 40 percent. The overall building height is 24'-10",which is below the maximum permitted height limit within the Hillside Overlay District. d. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The proposed single-family residence is compatible with the existing residences in the surrounding area and is not expected to create a detrimental impact on the existing neighborhood. 4. The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 3 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15303, which permits the construction of a single-family residence in a residential zone. The project is for the construction of a single-family residence in a residential zone and there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 19-64 HDR DRC2018-01014— RAMY IBRAHIM OCTOBER 23, 2019 Page 3 concurs in the staff's determination of exemption. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF OCTOBER 2019. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Tony Guglielmo, Chairman ATTEST: Anne McIntosh, Secretary I, Anne McIntosh, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 23rd day of October 2019, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Conditions of Approval RANCHO[;i1CAMONCA Community Development Department Project#: DRC2018-01014 Project Name: EDR - SINGLE FAMILY HOUSE Location: 7563 ALTA CUESTA- 020704429-0000 Project Type: Hillside Development Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval or Approval Letter, Conditions of Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 3. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption fee in the amount of $50.00. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing or within 5 days of the date of project approval. 4. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 5. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 6. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, the Development Code regulations. 7. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits for the development. For development occurring in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, the landscape plans will also be reviewed by Fire Construction Services. 8. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions www.CityofRC.us Printed:9/26/2019 Project#: DRC2018-01014 Project Name: EDR - SINGLE FAMILY HOUSE Location: 7563 ALTA CUESTA- 020704429-0000 Project Type: Hillside Development Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Development Impact Fees Due Prior to Building Permit Issuance: (Subject to Change / Periodic Increases - Refer to current fee schedule to determine current amounts) Drainage Impact Fee Transportation Impact Fee Library Impact Fee Animal Center Impact Fee Police Impact Fee Park In-Lieu / Park Impact Fee Park Improvement Impact Fee Community & Recreation Center Impact Fee Standard Conditions of Approval 2. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated on the plans. 3. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Curb & Gutter A.C. Pvmt Drive Approach Notes: (a) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (b) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item. www.CityofRC.us Printed:9/26/2019 Page 2 of 7 Project#: DRC2018-01014 Project Name: EDR - SINGLE FAMILY HOUSE Location: 7563 ALTA CUESTA- 020704429-0000 Project Type: Hillside Development Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 4. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch pvc with pull rope or as specified. e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all corners of intersections per latest ADA standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. 5. All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. 6. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 7. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 8. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. www.CityofRC.us Printed:9/26/2019 Page 3 of 7 Project#: DRC2018-01014 Project Name: EDR - SINGLE FAMILY HOUSE Location: 7563 ALTA CUESTA- 020704429-0000 Project Type: Hillside Development Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 9. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 10. Driveways All driveway approaches shall be constructed per City Standards and City Policy. 11. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. Building and Safety Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. When the Entitlement Review is approved submit complete construction drawings including structural calculations, energy calculations, and a soils report to Building and Safety for plan review in accordance with the current edition of the CA Building and Fire Codes including all local ordinances and standards. The new structures are required to be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers as required by the CBC and Current RCFPD Ordinance. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Grd. 017 Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout "information for Grading Plans and Permit". 2. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code and/or the California Residential Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 3. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 4. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. www.CityofRC.us Printed:9/26/2019 Page 4 of 7 Project#: DRC2018-01014 Project Name: EDR - SINGLE FAMILY HOUSE Location: 7563 ALTA CUESTA- 020704429-0000 Project Type: Hillside Development Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 5. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit. 6. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the grading plan shall show that all manufactured slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way, permitted line, or the adjacent private property. All slope offsets shall meet the requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 7. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over-excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 8. Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, the permitted grading plan (or architectural site plan) set shall show in each of the typical sections and the plan view show how the separations between the building exterior and exterior ground surface meet the requirements of Sections CBC1804.3/CRC R401.3, CBC2304.11.2.2/CRC R317.1(2) and CBC2512.1.2/CRC R703.7.2.1 of the current adopted California Building Code/Residential Code. 9. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall obtain a signed and notarized letter from the adjacent property owner(s) for ALL work proposed on the adjacent property. The letter shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set. The letter shall show on either the title sheet or a detail sheet of the grading and drainage plan set. 10. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire & record any required off-site drainage easements (or reservation) prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 11. Flow lines steeper than 6 percent could be erosive. The applicant shall provide hard lined gutters and swales where concentrated flows exceed 3fps, and anywhere that flow lines exceed 10 percent. This shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan prior to issuance of a grading permit. www.CityofRC.us Printed:9/26/2019 Page 5 of 7 Project#: DRC2018-01014 Project Name: EDR - SINGLE FAMILY HOUSE Location: 7563 ALTA CUESTA- 020704429-0000 Project Type: Hillside Development Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 12. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall demonstrate that the storm water run-off will not adversely affect the downstream properties and that the water may legally discharge to the downstream properties. The engineer of record shall show on the final permitted grading and drainage plan one (1) or more of the following items are met: a) There is sufficient downstream capacity to accept the proposed storm water flows and that the downstream property owner have provided permission to accept the upstream storm water flows; b) a legal document/entity exists allowing developed storm water flows to be discharged to the property lower in elevation; c) a storm drain system to safely convey the storm water flows to a public storm drain system without causing flooding to adjacent property(ies). 13. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution 92-17, if a lot may not directly drain off-site directly to the street or other acceptable drainage device (such as a drainage ditch adjacent to an equestrian trail), then: a) drainage may flow from only one lot onto only one other lot; b) a drainage easement shall be provided over the lot accepting the drainage; c) the drainage shall be contained within either a concrete/rock lined swale/channel or a reinforced concrete pipe; and d) the drainage shall be designed with excess capacity to account for the probable lack of necessary maintenance, therefore, it shall be designed to convey two (2) times the runoff from a 100-year storm event with the minimum diameter of the pipe being 12-inches. Please provide a drainage report for review. 14. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the latest adopted California Plumbing Code. Private storm drain improvements shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan. www.CityofRC.us Printed:9/26/2019 Page 6 of 7 Project#: DRC2018-01014 Project Name: EDR - SINGLE FAMILY HOUSE Location: 7563 ALTA CUESTA- 020704429-0000 Project Type: Hillside Development Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 15. This application for storm water quality management plan purposes may be considered a non-priority project. Therefore, prior to issuance of any building permit or Engineering Services Department issued right of way permit the land owner with the applicant shall file a Non-Priority Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) with the Building and Safety Department. The applicant may contact Matthew Addington, Associate Engineer, at (909) 477-2710, extension 4202. This project is required to prepare a non-priority WQMP project as the following requirement has been met: i) For areas less than 2,000 square feet of impervious area, the development will be considered a non-priority project and a WQMP document is not required, unless the project is for the outdoor storage of hazardous materials or other materials which may require a pre-treatment of the storm water runoff which will require that a non-priority WQMP document is prepared, including but not limited to, vehicle fueling operations; ii) For significant re-development projects proposing impervious areas of 2,000 square feet to 41999 square feet and new development projects proposing impervious areas of 2,000 square feet to 9,999 square feet the following criteria will require a non-priority WQMP document to be prepared: a. For all new and significant redevelopment projects; b. If the project is part of a common area of development, a non-priority WQMP document shall be prepared; c. If the proposed development is a commercial project the City will determine if activities may impact the water quality, and if impacts are determined to affect the water quality a non-priority WQMP document will be prepared; d. All industrial projects will require a non-priority WQMP document to be prepared. 16. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, the rough grading plan shall be a separate plan submittal and permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. www.CityofRC.us Printed:9/26/2019 Page 7 of 7 CITY . ■ . ■ . ■ �. STAFF REPORT DATE: October 23, 2019 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Planning Director INITIATED BY: Jennifer Nakamura, Management Analyst II SUBJECT: MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT DRC2019-00822 — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA — A request to amend Titles 16 (Subdivisions) and 17 (Development Code) of the Municipal Code to modify administrative procedures, correct errors and clarify standards for entertainment permits, accessory dwelling units, parking space dimensions and drive aisle dimensions. This item is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA guidelines under CEQA Section 15061(b)(3). This item will be forwarded to the City Council for final action. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the attached resolution recommending the City Council approve Municipal Code Amendment DRC2019-00822, amending the code to modify administrative procedures, correct errors and clarify standards for entertainment permits, accessory dwelling units, parking space dimensions and drive aisle dimensions. BACKGROUND: Since the adoption of a comprehensive Development Code update in 2012, staff regularly reviews the code to identify areas that need to be modified to address new or changing uses, update development standards, respond to changes in state law or to amend administrative procedures. Annually, or as needed, we will gather a group of minor code changes into one package. The changes proposed in this amendment would: (1) modify administrative procedures, (2) correct errors and (3) clarify standards for specific uses. ANALYSIS: A. Subdivision Review Process: Prior to being heard by the Planning Commission, subdivision maps are reviewed by the Design Review Committee (DRC), as required by Title 16. The DRC is tasked with reviewing projects with a specific focus on "reviewing the architecture (including material, finish, colors, and trim), site layout, building plotting, landscaping, compatibility with surrounding properties, and, when appropriate, signs, of new development" (RCMC 17.04.020 B). When a proposed project is for the subdivision of land only, with no buildings to be considered for architecture, layout or building plotting, there is little for the DRC to review prior to review by Planning Commission. The existing process adds a minimum of 4 weeks to the time it takes for a subdivision map to be considered by the Planning Commission as well as staff time and resources to draft DRC comments for committee consideration. Staff is recommending amending Title 16 to remove the requirement for the Design Review Committee to review subdivision maps as a standalone project. Staff will continue to review PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2019-00822 — City of Rancho Cucamonga October 23, 2019 Page 2 subdivisions for conformity with all development standards within the code. When a project is submitted that includes building product as well as the subdivision of land, the entire project will be reviewed by the DRC. B. Technical Review Committee: Like the DRC, certain projects are subject to review by the Technical Review Committee (TRC) for conformance with adopted building and engineering standards. This staff level committee was established many years ago, when the City was in a high growth mode, with large areas of vacant land to develop. As we shift to infill development and the redevelopment of underutilized properties, the need for this committee has diminished. Under our current development review process, engineering and building standards are reviewed up front and issues are solved to the greatest extent possible prior to final approval, with conditions of approval added if needed to ensure required standards are met. We are recommending that this committee be eliminated, as we did with the Grading Review Committee in 2014. This will save the project applicant time and reduce trips required to City Hall. C. Entertainment Permits: Entertainment permit requirements were first adopted in 1986 with a few minor changes made in the last 33 years. The city strives to encourage and develop commercial activity and maintain a supportive environment for local businesses by reviewing and streamlining processes which allow businesses to focus on providing a positive customer experience. Live entertainment promotes social and cultural benefits in addition to economic growth and compliments the quality of life valued in the City. To provide a more streamlined process to allow local businesses which desire to provide live entertainment which is both manageable and compatible with the preservation of public health and safety, staff is recommending the following changes to our entertainment permit regulations: a. Amend the review authority for entertainment permits from the Planning Commission to the Planning Director. The Planning Commission will be responsible for hearing all appeals to the decision of the Planning Director for future entertainment permits. b. Modify exception #5 to Section 17.20.020 to exempt all entertainment (with or without amplification) provided by four or fewer performers as an accessory use where dancing is not allowed. This allows businesses to have musicians or karaoke or hosted trivia events without an entertainment permit. Previously these types of performances would be exempt from a permit only if there was no microphone or other amplification of sound used. Existing noise standards would be used to address any possible noise issues caused by the amplification. D. Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU): Requirements and standards for ADUs were updated in 2018 to be consistent with State Law. ADUs can have a maximum square footage of up to 1,200 square feet and are not required to provide a garage or other covered parking space, however, some of the permit applications we have received include plans to construct a garage as part of the ADU. Staff recommends modifying the ADU chapter of the code to clarify that any accessory garage built as part of an ADU will not count toward their maximum ADU square footage. All other development standards (i.e. setbacks, lot coverage and design standards) will be required for both the ADU and any proposed garage. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2019-00822 — City of Rancho Cucamonga October 23, 2019 Page 3 E. Parking Space Dimensions and Drive Aisle Dimensions: During the comprehensive code update adopted in 2012, a transcription error from the old code to the new code resulted in a slight modification to the allowed parking dimensions for non-residential uses that was not intended to be modified. Changes to the Chapter 17.64 (Parking and Loading) are being proposed as an effort return the Development Code to its original intended version. The proposed modifications will ensure continuity with previously applied development standards present in existing development across the City. The modifications also correct and clarify several inconsistencies related to outdoor parking stall dimensions in the Development Code. F. Environmental Assessment: The Planning Department staff has determined that this Amendment is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies under the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects, which have the potential for causing significant effects on the environment. Pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(13)(3), where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. The Amendment does not propose any physical change to the environment itself. The Amendment's changes to the development review process is a procedural change and does not eliminate the need for future entitlements for projects at a specific location that may be subject to CEQA. The changes proposed for the regulation of entertainment are limited to the reviewing authority and the exemption of small amplified entertainment which is most often exempt from CEQA as it is accessory to another use in an existing facility. The text changes proposed to ADUs and parking dimensions are for clarification or correction purposes only. Future applications for development subject to these provisions will be reviewed for CEQA compliance under separate entitlements or actions as currently defined by the code. During the entitlement process, the applicant will be required to comply with CEQA. In reviewing each project for compliance with CEQA, an applicant may be required to submit environmental studies that analyze potential impacts such as air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, noise levels, and transportation/traffic caused by the site-specific project. On a case-by-case review of each project, the appropriate environmental document will be prepared to address project- specific impacts. Based on this evidence and all the evidence in the record Planning staff has determined that the Amendment will not have a significant effect on the environment and is therefore exempt from further environmental review under CEQA. FISCAL IMPACT: None COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: Updating and maintaining the development code and responding to changes in development and business needs enhances our premier community status by making Rancho Cucamonga a desirable community to work in. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2019-00822 — City of Rancho Cucamonga October 23, 2019 Page 4 CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing with a large 1/8th page legal advertisement in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper. To date, no comments or phone calls have been received regarding the project notifications. EXHIBITS: Draft Resolution 19-67 Recommending Approval of Municipal Code Amendment DRC2019- 00822. RESOLUTION NO.19-67 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT DRC2019-00822 TO AMEND ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES, CORRECT ERRORS AND CLARIFY STANDARDS FOR ENTERTAINMENT PERMITS, ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS, PARKING SPACE DIMENSIONS AND DRIVE AISLE DIMENSIONS AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF A. Recitals. 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared Municipal Code Amendment DRC2019- 00822, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Municipal Code Amendment is referred to as "the Application". 2. On October 23, 2019, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A of this Resolution, are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to the Planning Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on October 23, 2019, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The City Council adopted a comprehensive update to the City's Development Code that implements the policies of the General Plan, in July 2012. The new Development Code became effective on September 4, 2012; b. Based on feedback received since the effective date of the Development Code, the City prepared a set of amendments (the "Amendments"), which is included as Attachment A to this Resolution and is hereby incorporated by this reference as if set forth in full; C. Development Code Amendment DRC2019-00822 conforms to and does not conflict with the General Plan, including without limitation, the Land Use Element thereof, and will provide for development in a manner consistent with the General Plan; and 3. The Planning Department staff has determined that the project is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies under the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects, which have the potential for causing significant effect on the environment. Pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(B)(3), where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. The Amendment does not propose any physical change to the environment PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 19-67 MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT DRC2019-00822 — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA October 23, 2019 Page 2 itself. The Amendment's changes to the development review process is a procedural change and does not eliminate the need for future entitlements for projects at a specific location that may be subject to CEQA. The changes proposed for the regulation of entertainment are limited to the reviewing authority and the exemption of small amplified entertainment which is most often exempt from CEQA as it is accessory to another use in an existing facility. The text changes proposed to ADUs and parking dimensions are for clarification or correction purposes only. Future applications for development subject to these provisions will be reviewed for CEQA compliance under separate entitlements or actions as currently defined by the code. During the entitlement process,the applicant will be required to comply with CEQA. In reviewing each project for compliance with CEQA, an applicant may be required to submit environmental studies that analyze potential impacts such as air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, noise levels, and transportation/traffic caused by the site-specific project. On a case-by-case review of each project, the appropriate environmental document will be prepared to address project-specific impacts. Based on this evidence and all the evidence in the record, the Planning Commission concurs with the Planning Department staff's determination that the Amendment will not have a significant effect on the environment and is therefore exempt from further environmental review under CEQA. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve Municipal Code Amendment DRC2019-00822 as indicated in Attachment A incorporated herein by this reference. 5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23T" DAY OF OCTOBER 2019. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Tony Guglielmo, Chairman ATTEST: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary I, Anne McIntosh, Secretary of the Planning Commission for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 231h day of October 2019, by the following vote-to-wit: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 19-67 MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT DRC2019-00822 — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA October 23, 2019 Page 3 AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Attachment A Municipal Code Amendment DRC2019-00822 Proposed text changes to Titles 16 and 17 Title 16 (Subdivisions) 16.12.040 Planning director. The planning director shall be responsible for investigating proposed subdivisions for conformity to the general plan, specific plans, planned communities and zoning ordinances of the city and report*n^ Ns^r her findings together with re-c-A-MrAe—ndations fer approval or cenditienal appre-val tee the design review comm;tt 9 G - n7n nesigR revieui cw.mmittee (I)DC) The design Atee shall be responsible fA-.r the r&VaP&.AV A-f tp-ritatkVe maps (fGF SUbdiViSSOAGIRS Aef five A-1,mere parcels or UR*tS)for geReral layeut and aesthetics pursuant W GOVpr'n'FA'P'nt C-Arle § 6647-3.1 Gomm rr. 16-.18.^' Design Fevie +thee. nt anal rpe re ernrn n.d-,t�en t.,th., p 1 a n n ng 16.16.090 Planning commission; general action. A. Upon having accepted the tentative map for filing, and after completing department review of the same,and r nt of r.,rc.,.,-.., endati.,n the.J.,,,eleprnent Fevoew eemmittee and design review mittee the community development director shall schedule the tentative map for review by the planning commission. Title 17 (Development Code) 17.04.020 Planning agency. Government Code § 65100 requires each jurisdiction to establish a planning agency to carry out the land use and planning functions of the jurisdiction.The functions of the planning agency, as designated by the title, shall be carried out by the following bodies. In the absence of an assignment,the city council shall retain responsibility and authority as the legislative body of the city. A. Planning director.The planning director, or designee, shall have the responsibility and authority to administer and enforce this title as follows: 1. Application process. Receive and review all applications for development pursuant to this title. Processing includes but is not limited to the certification of completed applications,the establishment of a permanent file, posting of public notices, collection of applicable fees, preparation of reports, processing of appeals, and presentation of staff reports to the development review committees, planning commission, historic preservation commission, and city council. 2. Interpretation. Interpret the provisions and advise the public on the requirements of this title. 3. Amendment. Initiate action for amendment of this title where it is determined that such amendment would better implement the general plan goals and objectives and increase its effectiveness and/or improve or clarify the contents of this title. 4. Permit issuance. Issue permits under this title and certify that all such permits are in full conformance with its requirements. 5. Coordination. Refer and coordinate matters related to the administration of this title with other agencies and city departments and provide information on the status of all development permits. 6. Authority. Serve as the administrative zoning body and exercise that authority set forth in Government Code § 65900 et seq. B. Design review committee.The design review committee is responsible for reviewing the architecture (including material,finish, colors, and trim), site layout, building plotting, landscaping, compatibility with surrounding properties, and, when appropriate, signs, of new development.The committee's emphasis is on quality design in the community as described in the city's general plan and this title.The design review committee consists of two planning commissioners and the planning director(or designee). ;Afell -ar-the R-;;nc-.hA- Cucamonga Fore DistFiet. Represent-ative-S fre.m. eutside agencies, such as t4ee from the public right of way and the project site, ut"ities, emergency access and C. TP--r-h.Pi-GGI r-eview c-enq.mift-P-P.The te-ohnic-al review committee ensures a project conforms-to 17 213 13213 17.16.170 Entertainment permit. A. Purpose.The purpose of an entertainment permit is to provide a discretionary review process for new entertainment uses where food and/or beverage is sold concurrently with any form of entertainment in order to ensure public health and safety. B. Applicability. No person or business entity shall operate, conduct, or manage any place or premises open to the public where food or beverages are sold, offered for sale, or given away, and where any form of entertainment, as defined herein, is provided or furnished without first obtaining a permit so to do as hereinafter provided for in this chapter. C. Exceptions.The provisions of this chapter shall not be deemed to require a permit for any of the following: 1. Use of a radio or other electronic playback device, except when utilized by an announcer or disc jockey whose live performance consists of selecting or manipulating prerecorded selections of music or other sounds. 2. Entertainment provided for members and their guests at a private club where admission is not open to the public. 3. Entertainment conducted in connection with a regularly established motion picture theater, recreation park, circus, or fairground. 4. Entertainment conducted by or sponsored by any bona fide club, society, or association, organized or incorporated for benevolent, charitable, dramatic, or literary purposes, having an established membership, and which holds meetings at regular intervals of not less than once per three-month period,when proceeds, if any, arising from such entertainment are used for the purpose of such club, society, or association. 5. Unampl+fied Entertainment provided by no more than four performers as an accessory use to an established business where dancing is not allowed. 6. Entertainment conducted solely on or at any premises or location which is owned or operated by, or leased by,to, or from the United States, State of California, County of San Bernardino, City of Rancho Cucamonga, or any agency or subdivision thereof. 7. Any adult entertainment business regulated by section 17.20.050 (Adult Entertainment Permit) of this Code. D. Review process. Applicants for entertainment permits shall file a written, signed, and verified application with the planning director along with the required application materials and fee. E. Findings.The planning tea„director shall only approve an application for an entertainment permit if all of the following findings are made: 1. The conduct of the establishment or the granting of the application is consistent to the public health, safety, morals, or welfare. 2. The premises or establishment is likely to be operated in a legal, proper, and orderly manner. 3. Granting the application would not create a public nuisance. 4. The normal operation of the premises would not interfere with the peace and quiet of any surrounding residential neighborhood. 5. The applicant has not made any false, misleading, or fraudulent statement of material fact in the required application. F. Conditions.The planning eemn9issien director in granting any permit may also impose such reasonable conditions as to the use or extent of such permit as deemed appropriate. G. Annual renewal. Entertainment permits require submission of an annual renewal statement and fee, due on or before January 1 of each and every year.A written request for one 30-day extension may be submitted and is subject to approval of the planning director.The applicant for every renewal of an entertainment permit shall submit to the planning director a written statement setting forth such information concerning the applicant's business during the preceding year as may be required by the planning director to enable him or her to ascertain whether the information listed on the original entertainment permit application has changed in the past year. G.H. Transfer of permit. 1. An entertainment permit issued pursuant to this chapter may be transferred or assigned to another person or business entity at the same physical location, provided there is no intensification or substantial alteration of the originally approved entertainment use.Any request for transfer of an entertainment permit due to change in ownership shall be submitted in writing to the planning director. 2. An entertainment permit issued pursuant to this chapter shall not be transferred or assigned to another location for any purpose. Any change in location shall require a new permit.The following shall be deemed a change of location: i. Any relocation or expansion that includes a separate piece of property or parcel of land; or ii. Any expansion of the initially permitted premises which represents a greater than 50 percent increase in the square footage of space devoted to public access or occupancy. 17.100.040 Development standards. TABLE 17.100.040-1 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS Accessory Dwelling Unit Type Minimum Size Maximum Size' Height Attached 220 sq.ft. 50% of main dwelling unit Cannot exceed the or 1,200 sq. ft. height of the primary structure Detached 350 sq.ft. 1,200 sq.ft. 16 feet 'Maximum size for ADU does not include optional accessory structures(i.e.garage) 17.64.040 General parking and loading requirements. The layout of parking spaces, loading berths, and parking aisles shall comply with all the requirements listed below.These parking requirements apply to both on-and off-street parking spaces, unless specifically stated otherwise. A. The required parking spaces, loading berths, and parking aisles may not be located on any street right-of-way. B. Parking space and drive aisle dimensions. 1. When outdoors (e.g., parking lot), each parking space shall have a minimum size of nine feet by 17 feet with a required one-foot overhang(e.g., over a curb stop) and shall be free of obstructions such as columns or walls. 2. When indoors or under a shelter(e.g., parking structure or carport/shade structure), each parking space shall be ten feet by 20 feet 9 feet by 18 feet . where columns or walls are located with'^the paFkiRg area. When adjacent to a column or wall, each parking space shall be 10 feet by 20 feet. At the discretion of the planning director, parking spaces adjacent to a column or wall may be reduced to 9 feet by 18 feet. 3. Each loading berth shall be a minimum size of 12 feet by 30 feet whether indoors or outdoors. 4. When garage parking is required, parking spaces shall be designed in a side by side configuration with a minimum of ten feet wide by 20 feet deep for each required parking space free and clear of obstructions. If tandem parking is provided, only one space will count toward the minimum parking requirements. 5. Parking aisles and spaces shall meet the dimensional requirement of Table 17.64.040-1 (Angled Parking Space and Drive Aisle Dimensions) and Table 17.64.040-2 (Parallel Parking Space and Drive Aisle Dimensions) and the related Figures 17.64.040-1 and 17.64.040-2. C. Parking space and drive aisle dimensions. 1. When outdoors (e.g., parking lot), each parking space shall have a minimum size of nine feet by 3718 feet or nine feet by 17 feet with a required one-foot overhang(e.g., over a curb stop). Each space shall be free of obstructions such as columns or walls. 2. All parking stalls shall be permanently maintained with double lines,with two lines located an equal of nine inches on either side of the stall sidelines. TABLE 17.64.040-1 ANGLED PARKING SPACE AND DRIVE AISLE DIMENSIONS Angle Stall Width a Stall to Curb b Aisle c Two Rows+Aisle d 90, 9'-01, 19' 0" 18'-0" 25'-0" 24'-0" 63'-0" 9'-6" 191-011 18'-0" 24' 2" 24'-0" 62'-6" 10'-0" 491-011 18'-0" 24'-0"(l) 62'-0" 60' 9'-0" 21'0" 20'-0"(1) 62"-0" 9'-0" 21'-0" 19'-0"(2) 61'-0" 9'-6" 21'-3" 18'-6"(2) 61'-0" 10'-0" 21'-6" 18'-0"(2) 61'-0" 45' 9'-0" 19'-10" 20'-0"(1) 59'-8" 9'-0" 19'-10" 16'-4"(2) 56'-0" 9'-6" 20'-2" 15'-2"(2) 55'-6" 10'-0" 20'-6" 14'-0"(2) 55'-0" Table notes: (1) Two-way aisle. (2) One-way aisle.