Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2000/10/04 - Agenda Packet
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 City Office: (909) 477-2700 AGENDAS FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETINGS: 1sT and 3rd Wednesdays, 7:00 p.m. October 4, 2000 Aclencv, Board & City Council Members William J. Alexander ....................Mayor Diane Williams ...............Mayor Pro Tem Paul Biane ...............................Member James V. Curatalo .....................Member Bob Dutton ..............................Member Jack Lam .........................City Manager James L. Markman .............City Attorney Debra J. Adams .....................City Clerk ORDER OF BUSINESS 5:30 p.m. Closed Session ................................. Tapia Conference Room 7:00 p.m. Regular Fire Protection District Meeting ....... Council Chambers Regular City Council Meeting ......................Council Chambers City Council Agenda October 4, 2000 All items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in writing. The deadline for submitting these items is 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, one week prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's Office receives all such items. A. CALL TO ORDER 1. Roll Call: Alexander Biane Curatalo Dutton , and Williams B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS 1. Presentation of a Proclamation commending Rancho Little League, Junior Division; Rancho Little League, Big League Division; and Vineyard Little League, Major Division on their District 21 Victory. 2. Introduction of newly-assigned deputies, Gina Harmon, Brandon Rio, Randy Rouse, Stacy Schneiderwent, and Stacatto Stevenson to the Rancho Cucamonga Police Station. C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. D. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Councilmember or member of the audience for discussion. 1. Approval of Minutes: September 6, 2000 2. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 9/13/00 and 9/20/00 and Payroll 1 ending 9/14/00 for the total amount of $3,229,407.06. 3. Approval to declare Surplus Miscellaneous City-owned equipment. 12 4. Approval for the replacement of two pieces of equipment, an Excel 340 17 Bac Vao Riding Mower and an Excel 4400 Bac Vac Riding Mower, from C.R. Jaeschke, Inc. of San Diego, California, to be funded from Account No. 72-4225-7044 for the amount of $48,740.41. City Council Agenda October 4, 2000 5. Approval to enter into a Communications Site Ground Lease Agreement 18 (CO 00-070) at Red Hill Park between Los Angeles SMSA Limited Padnership, dba Verizon Wireless by Aidouch Cellular and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the purpose of installing a wireless communication facility for Los Angeles SMSA's Personal Communication Service. 6. Approval of a Professional Services Agreement with Best, Best and 20 Krieger (CO 00-071) for Bond Counsel Services in conjunction with a proposed Community Facilities District (South Etiwanda) in an amount not to exceed $10,000 for formation services and not to exceed $15,000 for debt issuance services; to be funded by the project developer. 7. Approval of a Professional Services Agreement with Empire Economics (CO 00-072) to perform Market Absorption Services in conjunction with a proposed Community Facilities District (South Etiwanda) in an amount not to exceed $12,500; to be funded by the project developer. 8. Approval of Improvement Agreement, Agreement Extension for Tract 22 14120, -2 and -3 on the south side of Vintage Drive, west of Etiwanda Avenue, submitted by Mar Vista Homes, A California Corporation. RESOLUTION NO. 00-193 24 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL QF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 14120, -2 AND -3 9. Approval to accept Improvements, Release the Faithful Performance Bond and File a Notice of Completion for Improvements for Parcel Map 15012, submitted by OItmans Investment Company, located on the north side of Fourth Street, between Buffalo Avenue and I-15 Freeway. 27 RESOLUTION NO. 00-194 A RESOLUTION QF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAP 15012 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 10. Approval of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities and 28 Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 4 for CUP 99-25, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard between Milliken and Elm Avenues, submitted by Western Land Propedies. City Council Agenda October 4, 2000 RESOLUTION NO. 00-195 31 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR CUP 99-25 RESOLUTION NO. 00-196 32 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4 FOR CUP 99-25 11. Approval of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security, and 40 Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2 and summarily vacate an excess street easement for Tract Map No. 15963 located on the nodhwest corner of London Avenue and Liberty Street, submitted by Crestwood Corporation. RESOLUTION NO. 00-197 42 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP NO. 15963, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY RESOLUTION NO. 00-198 43 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR TRACT NO. 15963 51 RESOLUTION NO. 00-199 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE SUMMARILY VACATION OF EXCESS STREET EASEMENT ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LONDON AVENUE AND LIBERTY STREET, V-175 -APN 201-251-56 RELATED FILE TR 15963 City Council Agenda October 4, 2000 4 12. Approval of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and 54 Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6, for DR 00-06, located on the north side of Arrow Route, East of 1-15 Freeway, submitted by Cabot Industrial Properties, L.P. RESOLUTION NO. 00-200 56 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DR 00-06 RESOLUTION NO. 00-201 57 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR DR 00-06 13. Approval of Map and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape 63 Maintenance District No. 4 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 4 for Parcel Map 15476 at the southeast corner of Haven Avenue and Town Center Drive, submitted by Western Land Properties. RESOLUTION NO. 00-202 64 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPRQVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 15476 RESOLUTION NO. 00-203 65 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4 FOR PARCEL MAP 15476 City Council Agenda October 4, 2000 14. Approval of Map and Monumentation Cash Deposit for Parcel Map No. 72 15424, located on the nodh side of Foothill Boulevard between Milliken and Elm Avenues, submitted by Western Land Properties. RESOLUTION NO. 00-204 74 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 15424 AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT 15. Approval of Parcel Map Nos. 15453, 15454 and 15455, located on the 75 east side of Milliken Avenue between Base Line Road and Foothill Boulevard, submitted by Lewis Operating Corporation. RESOLUTION NO. 00-205 77 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NOS, 15453, 15454 AND 15455 16. Approval of Drainage Acceptance Agreement for Tract 15948, located 81 on the south side of Base Line Road west of Etiwanda Avenue, submitted by WL Homes LLC, DBA John Laing Homes. RESOLUTION NO. 00-206 83 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DRAINAGE ACCEPTANCE AGREEMENT FOR TRACT 15948, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF BASE LINE ROAD WEST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY WL HOMES LLC, DBA JOHN LAING HOMES AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF 17. Approval to release a Real Properly Improvement Contract and Lien 84 Agreement for Parcels 1 and 2 of Parcel Map 9349, located on the south side of Strang Lane, east of Carnelian Street, submitted by Danny W. Paulson and Earline R. Paulson. RESOLUTION NO. 00-207 86 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RELEASING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM DANNY W. PAULSON AND EARLINE R. PAULSON City Council Agenda October 4, 2000 18. Approval of a request to summarily vacate an excess street right-of-way 87 located on the west side of Industrial Lane south of Feron Boulevard, V- 174, APN 209-032-39. RESOLUTION NO. 00-208 89 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY ORDERING THE VACATION OF EXCESS STREET RIGHT-OF- WAY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF INDUSTRIAL LANE SOUTH OF FERON BOULEVARD 19. Approval to release the Faithful Performance Bond for CUP 99-10, 92 submitted by Evergreen Devco, Inc., located on the southeast corner of Carnelian and Nineteenth Street. E. CONSENT ORDINANCES The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time of first reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and non- controversial. The Council will act them upon at one time without discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be removed for discussion. 1. ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 00-01 - CITY OF 94 RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to change the Etiwanda North Specific Plan zoning designation from Utility Corridor to Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) for approximately 64 acres of land (abandoned Southern California Edison corridor) generally located north of SR 30, on the east side of the northerly prolongation of Day Creek Boulevard approximately 300 feet wide by 8,000 feet in length APN NO: 225-161-64, 225-101-41,225-071-61, and 225-082-03. The County of San Bernardino Board of Supervisors previously certified an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) in 1991 and a Supplemental EIR (SEIR) on October 26, 1999. The City of Rancho Cucamonga in conjunction with this project has prepared an addendure to the SEIR. The proposed amendment is intended to create consistency between the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan and the County approved University Planned Development. Related files: Development Agreement 00-02, Annexation 00-01, GPA 00-03A. City Council Agenda October 4, 2000 7 ORDINANCE NO. 636 (second reading) 94 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 00-01, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS MAP FROM UTILITY CORRIDOR TO LOW RESIDENTIAL (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF SR 30 AND ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE NORTHERLY PROLONGATION OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD APPROXIMATELY 300 FEET WIDE BY 8,000 FEET IN LENGTH, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 225-161-64, 225-101-41, 225-071-61, AND 225-082-03 F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. No items submitted. G,~. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. 1. APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION AND ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE 99 CONTRACT (CO 188)WITH THE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM TO PROVIDE SECTION 21574, FOURTH LEVEL OF 1959 SURVIVOR BENEFIT RESOLUTION NO. 00-192 100 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO APPROVE AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONTRACT BETWEEN THE BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION OF THE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM AND THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA City Council Agenda October 4, 2000 ORDINANCE NO. 637 (first reading) 107 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHQ CUCAMONGA AND THE BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION OF THE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM TO PROVIDE SECTION 21574, FOURTH LEVEL OF 1959 SURVIVORS BENEFIT FOR ALL MISCELLANEOUS MEMBERS 2. CONSIDERATION OF APPEAL - WHITE - An appeal of the '111 Planning Commission's denial of a building permit to re-roof with standing seam metal on a house located at 6875 Pecan Avenue - APN: 227-254-02. H,~. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. 1. CONSIDERATION TO ADOPT ANNUAL STATEMENT OF 130 INVESTMENT POLICY I. COUNCIL BUSINESS The following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion. They are not public hearing items, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. No items submitted. J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING This is the time for City Council to identify the items they wish to discuss at the next meeting. These items will not be discussed at this meeting, only identified for the next meeting. K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the city Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. City Council Agenda October 4, 2000 9 L. ADJOURNMENT I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on September 28, 2000, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. September 6, 2000 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Regular Meetinq A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, September 6, 2000 in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 7:18 p.m. by Mayor Alexander. Present were Councilmembers: Paul Biane, James Curatalo, Bob Dutton, Diane Willlares, and Mayor William J. Alexander. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; Pamela Easter, Deputy City Manager; Craig Fox, Deputy City Attorney; Linda D. Daniels, Redevelopment Agency Director; Larry Temple, Administrative Services Director; Ingrid Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Supervisor; Sid Siphomsay, Information Systems Analyst; Sam Davis, Information Systems Specialist; Rick Gomez, Community Development Director; Joe Q'Neil, City Engineer; Shintu Bose, Deputy City Engineer; Brad Buller, City Planner; John Thomas, Plan Check Manager/Fire; Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director; Paula Pachon, Management Analyst III; Deborah Clark, Library Director; Captain Rodney Hoops, Police Department; Chief Dennis Michael, Fire Protection District; Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager; Diane O'Neal, Assistant to the City Manager; Jenny Haruyama, Management Analyst I; Jim Frost, City Treasurer; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk. B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS B1. Presentation of a Proclamation commending the Rancho Cucamonga Eagles 16 and Under Baseball Team on its United States Amateur Baseball Federation World Series Championship. Mayor Alexander presented the Proclamation to Coach McDonald and his staff and certificates were given to each team member to congratulate them on their victory. B2. Presentation of a Plaque recognizing the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District's support of the Fire Technology Program sponsored by the Baldy View Regional Occupational Program. Tim Hayward and Joseph Shaw from the Baldy View ROP Office presented Chief Michael with a plaque thanking the Fire District for being involved and so supportive of their program. C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC C1. John Lyons of Etiwanda commended the Fire District and Fire Chief. He stated he wanted to talk about the Haven View Estates area. He stated there was a recent study done by an outside engineering firm and they are standing behind the flood control system in the City because they have certified it. He thanked the Council for making sure the City is safe. C2. Bob Christiano, property owner in Haven View Estates, talked about the report delivered to the Council this week. He stated it is not all of the people in Haven View Estates that are complaining about the debris basin going to fail. He stated he hopes this issue is over. City Council Minutes September 6, 2000 Page 2 C3. George Georgiou asked why the letter asking for his appeal to be on the Council agenda was not on there. Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, stated his letter was received at 5:34 p.m. on August 31 which was after the Council agenda had already been completed and posted for this meeting. Mr. Georgiou continued to read his letter of August 31, which is on file in the City Clerk's office. Mayor Alexander asked if there was anyone on the Council that would like to place this on the agenda for discussion. Councilmember Dutton stated he would like to. MOTION: Moved by Dutton, seconded by Willjams to hear this matter and add it on the agenda tonight for discussion of his request. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. Mayor Alexander stated it would be placed on the agenda as the last item for discussion. D, CONSENT CALENDAR D1. Approval of Minutes: July 19, 2000 (Special/Adjourned Joint Meeting) August 16, 2000 D2. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 8/9/00, 8/16/00, 8/23/00 and Payroll ending 8/13/00, for the total amount of $5,235,163.36. D3. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Lower Hermosa Avenue Storm Drain and Street Widening Improvements - Phase I, to be funded with Redevelopment Agency Funds, Account No. 15-51000. RESOLUTION NO. 00-163 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "LOWER HERMOSA AVENUE STORM DRAIN AND STREET WIDENING IMPROVEMENTS - PHASE I" IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS D4. Approval to appropriate $68,260 for Fund 19-4637-9120 for Etiwanda Area Master Plan Drainage Reimbursement Agreements for FY 2000/01. D5. Authorization to appropriate $6,200 in Account Number 01-4333-6028 to supplement funding of the City's Sphere of Influence. D6. Approval to authorize the replacement purchase of two PB Patch Trucks from Dieterich International Truck Sales, Inc. of San Bernardino, California, through a Piggyback Cooperative Purchase Agreement with the County of San Bernardino, California, funded from Account 09-4637- 7045 in the amount of $250,000. City Council Minutes September 6, 2000 Page 3 D7. Approval to authorize the replacement purchase of two pieces of equipment, a John Deere Loader with trailer and a John Deere Backhoe with options, from RDO Equipment Company of Riverside, California, through a Piggyback Purchase Option with two municipal government agencies, the City of Hemet, California, for the backhoe ($80,128.29), and the County of Los Angeles for the Loader ($147,312.95) to be funded from Account 09-4637-7045. D8. Approval of Street Banner Applications and Schedule for Fiscal Year 200012001. D9. Approval to accept Conflict of Interest Codes from Redevelopment Agency and Fire Protection District. D10. Approval of Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for Minor Development Review 99-15, located at 11355 Arrow Route, submitted by Keep on Trucking. RESOLUTION NO. 00-164 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR MDR 99-15 D11. Approval of Map, acceptance of Monumentation Guarantee and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for Parcel Map 15295, located on Milliken Avenue between Foothill Boulevard and Arrow Route, submitted by Catellus Development Corporation. RESOLUTION NO. 00-165 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 15295 RESOLUTION NO. 00-166 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR PARCEL MAP 15295 D12. Approval to approve the Drug Abuse Resistance Education (DARE) Memorandum of Understanding for Fiscal Year 2000-01 (CO 00-066). D13. Approval and execution of a Cooperative Agreement (CO 00-067) between the State of California (State), the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (Authority), the City of Rancho Cucamonga (City), and the County of San Bernardino (County) for Construction of Segment 5 of State Route 210 (30) in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. City Council Minutes September 6, 2000 Page 4 RESOLUTION NO. 00-167 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE EXECUTION OF A COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA (STATE), THE SAN BERNARDINQ COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY (AUTHORITY), THE CITY OF RANCHQ CUCAMONGA (CITY) AND THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO (COUNTY) FOR CONSTRUCTION OF SEGMENT 5 OF STATE ROUTE 210 (30) IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA D14. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bonds, accept the Maintenance Bonds and file a Notice of Completion for Improvements for Tracts 15796 and 15796-1, submitted by Tava Development DBA Citation Homes, located on the northeast corner of Milliken Avenue and Victoria Park Lane. RESOLUTION NO. 00-168 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACTS 15796 AND 15796-1 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK D15. Approval of a Resolution adopting a Boundary Map of the territory proposed for inclusion in proposed Community Facilities District 2000-01 (South Etiwanda) RESOLUTION NO. 00-169 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A BOUNDARY MAP SHOWING THE BOUNDARIES OF THE TERRITORY PROPOSED FOR INCLUSION IN PROPOSED COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2000- 01 (SOUTH ETIWANDA) D16. Approval of a Resolution declaring Intention to Establish Community Facilities District 2000-01 (South Etiwanda) and to authorize the levy of a special tax therein to finance the provision of certain public services and the acquisition of certain public facilities. RESOLUTION NO. 00-170 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ESTABLISH COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2000-01 (SOUTH ETIWANDA) AND TO AUTHORIZE THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX THEREIN TO FINANCE THE ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN PUBLIC FACILITIES D17. Approval of a Resolution ordering and directing the preparation of a report for proposed Community Facilities District 2000-01 (South Etiwanda). City Council Minutes September 6, 2000 Page 5 RESOLUTION NO. 00-171 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING AND DIRECTING THE PREPARATION OF A REPORT FOR PROPOSED COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2000-01 (SOUTH ETIWANDA) D18. Approval of a Resolution declaring intention to issue bonds secured by special taxes to pay for the acquisition of certain facilities in proposed Community Facilities District 2000-01 (South Etiwanda). RESOLUTION NO. 00-172 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING INTENTION TO ISSUE BONDS SECURED BY SPECIAL TAXES TO PAY FOR THE ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN FACILITIES IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2000-01 (SOUTH ETIWANDA) D19. Approval of a Resolution adopting a Boundary Map of the territory proposed for inclusion in proposed Community Facilities District 2000-02 (Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park). RESOLUTION NO. 00-173 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A BOUNDARY MAP SHOWING THE BOUNDARIES OF THE TERRITORY PROPOSED FOR INCLUSION IN PROPOSED COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2000- 02 (RANCHO CUCAMONGA CORPORATE PARK) D20. Approval of a Resolution declaring Intention to Establish Community Facilities District 2000-02 (Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park) and to authorize the levy of a special tax therein to finance the acquisition of certain public facilities. RESOLUTION NO. 00-174 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ESTABLISH COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2000-02 (RANCHO CUCAMONGA CORPORATE PARK) AND TO AUTHORIZE THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX THEREIN TO FINANCE THE ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN PUBLIC FACILITIES D21. Approval of a Resolution ordering and directing the preparation of a report for proposed Community Facilities District 2000-02 (Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park). RESOLUTION NO. 00-175 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING AND DIRECTING THE PREPARATION OF A REPORT FOR PROPOSED COMMUNITY FACILITEIS DISTRICT 2000-02 (RANCHO CUCAMONGA CORPORATE PARK) City Council Minutes September 6, 2000 Page 6 D22. Approval of a Resolution declaring intention to issue bonds secured by special taxes to pay for the acquisition of certain facilities in proposed Community Facilities District 2000-02 (Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park). RESOLUTION NO. 00-176 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING INTENTION TO ISSUE BONDS SECURED BY SPECIAL TAXES TO PAY FOR THE ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN FACILITIES IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2000-02 (RANCHO CUCAMONGA CORPORATE PARK) MOTION: Moved by Biane, seconded by Dutton to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports contained within the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. E. CONSENTORDINANCES El. ADDENDUM TO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 00-02 - U.C.P., INC. - Consideration of approval for a development agreement for approximately 504 acres of the San Bernardino County unincorporated area, generally located north of Highland Avenue between Hanley Avenue and Rochester Avenue - Tentative Tract Map 14493 through 14498, 14522, 14523, 15838, and 15902. An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was previously certified on October 26, 1999. An addendum to the EIR was prepared because the project description did not include a development agreement or the construction of full improvements to the extension of Banyan Street from Day Creek Channel to Rochester Avenue, or full improvements to the segment of Day Creek Boulevard between Banyan Avenue and SR 30. The addendure was prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). ORDINANCE NO. 631 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 00-02, A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND U.C.P. INC. FOR THE PURPOSE OF DEVELOPING AN APPROXIMATELY 250-ACRE SITE WITH UP TO 685 RESIDENTIAL LOTS AND UP TO TWO COMMERCIAL AREAS, GENERALLY LCOATED NORTH OF HIGHLAND AVENUE, BETWEEN DAY CREEK CHANNEL AND WEST OF HANLEY AVENUE - TENTATIVE TRCT MAP 14493 THROUGH 14498, 14522, 14523, 15838, AND 15902 E2. INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 00-02 - CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - Consideration to amend the industrial Area Specific Plan, Development Code Chapter 17.30, to include "Medium Manufacturing" and "Medium Wholesale, Storage, and Distribution" as permitted uses on parcels of 35 acres of larger, subject to the approval of a Master Plan, within the Industrial Park District (Subarea 6) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan. City Council Minutes September 6, 2000 Page ? ORDINANCE NO. 632 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 00-02, TO INCLUDE "MEDIUM MANUFACTURING" AND "MEDIUM WHOLESALE, STORAGE AND DISTRIBUTION" AS PERMITTED USES ON PROPERTY OF 35 ACRES OR LARGER SUBJECT TO A MASTER PLAN, WITHIN THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF E3. ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 00-01 - LENNAR HOMES OF CALIFORNIA - Consideration to amend the Etiwanda Specific Plan to modifi/the design of Wdson Avenue from Wardman Bullock Road to approximately 1400 feet west of Wardman Bullock Road. Staff has prepared a Notice of Categorical Exemption. ORDINANCE NO. 633 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 00-01, TO MODIFY THE PROPOSED WILSON AVENUE STREET SECTION BY REDUCING THE SOUTH PARKVVAY WIDTH FROM 65 FEET TO 38 FEET FROM WARDMAN BULLOCK ROAD TO APPROXIMATELY 1400 FEET WEST OF WARDMAN BULLOCK ROAD AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF E4. CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SUBSECTION 12.04.01B OF SECTION 12.04,010 OF CHAPTER 12.04 OF TITLE 12 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING THE POSSESSION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES ORDINANCE NO. 634 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SUBSECTION 12.04.010B OF SECTION 12.04.010 OF CHAPTER 12.04 OF TITLE 12 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING POSSESSION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES E5. ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 00-02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - Consideration to amend the Etiwanda Specific Plan to update street trees. Staff has prepared a Notice of Categorical Exemption. ORDINANCE NO. 635 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 00-02, TO UPDATE STREET TREE REFERENCES AND RELATED FIGURES AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the titles of Ordinance Nos. 631,632, 633,634 and 635. MOTION: Moved by Curatalo, seconded by Dutton to waive full reading and approve Ordinance Nos. 631,632, 633, 634 and 635. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. City Council Minutes September 6, 2000 Page g F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS No Items Submitted. G. PUBLIC HEARINGS No Items Submitted. H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS H1. CONSIDERATION OF A PROPOSAL FOR CO-SPONSORSHIP QF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE'S GRAPE HARVEST FESTIVAL SCHEDULED FOR OCTOBER 6-8, 2000, AT THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA EPICENTER EXPANDED PARKING LOT Staff report presented by Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the City Council was: Ron Stark, President of the Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce, stated they have enjoyed working with staff on this event which he felt would be a very good one. He thanked the Council for their support. MOTION: Moved by Dutton, seconded by Wdliams to approve staff's recommendation. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. I. COUNCIL BUSINESS I1. REPORT ON TRAFFIC AND STREET CLOSURES DUE TO CONSTRUCTION (Oral) Staff report presented by Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, who talked about all of the street projects stating the City does not take these lightly. He added the City feels these are very important and seriously considers the impact they have upon the City. He continued to talk about the projects being done by the utility companies. He also informed the Council about the school district project going on at Rochester and Lark Drive and about the project going on near Etiwanda High School. He described various capital improvement projects and gave an update on the Route 30 Freeway. Councilmember Curatalo talked about the Haven Bridge project and felt the speed should be checked around the detour route. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, stated he would check into this. Councilmember Wdliams commended Caltrans for working with the City on developing the brain for the freeway. Councilmember Biane thanked staff for trying to make this easier on the people driving the streets. He brought up a complaint he had received from the Summit/Blue Gum area and the traffic in that area because of the freeway construction. City Council Minutes September 6, 2000 Page 9 Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, stated they are monitoring this area to make sure people are not cutting through the neighborhoods. Councilmember Willlares felt the small contractors should be monitored to make sure they are following all the safety regulations. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, stated staff is also monitoring this. ACTION: Report received and filed. 12. ADDED ITEM - CONSIDERATION OF DISCUSSING MR. GEORGIOU'S REQUEST AS OUTLINED IN HIS LETTER OF AUGUST 31, 2000. Mr. Georgiou stated he would like the Council acting as a Board of Appeals to place his appeal of April 19, 1999 on the agenda. Councilmember Dutton asked what was the difference what occurred at the meeting held in March by calling a special Council meeting and convening as a Board of Appeals. Mr. Georgiou explained the difference is they were not sitting as a Board of Appeals and did not follow the rules that were in effect at the time they filed the appeal. He did not understand why the appeal should be based on rules that were past after they filed their appeal. He continued to inform the Council about this. Councilmember Dutton stated he did not understand why Mr. Georgiou felt the special City Council meeting held last March had less authority than if they had sat as a Board of Appeals. Jack Lain, City Manager, stated the issue is that Mr. Georgiou felt his wall was not constructed properly. He continued to present information as to why the Council heard the appeal. After the Council acted on this matter at a special Council meeting the Council then offered this matter to be heard before the Building Board of Appeals. He stated the basic issue is if the wall is properly constructed or not and stated the Council did take action on this matter. He stated Mr. Georgiou can take that decision to court if he wants to. He also commented on the number of letters Mr. Georgiou has sent to the City stating the City would also respond back to him as they would anyone that corresponds to the City. Mayor Alexander stated the City Council did hear Mr. Georgiou's appeal on the construction of the wall and that the Council denied his appeal. He stated the Council will let him go back and be heard by the Building Board of Appeals who are really the experts in this field. Mr. Georgiou stated he was not happy that Mr. Makshanoff did not respond to him in writing as required by the code. Rick Gomez, Community Development Director, stated Mr. Makshanoff did respond to him in writing about his opinion of the wall. He continued to give additional background information on Mr. Georgiou's appeal process. Mayor Alexander suggested a chronological report be prepared to the City Council for the agenda to allow the Council the opportunity to discuss this. He stated his personal opinion is that the validity of the Council's decision will still stand. Councilmember Biane stated he did not think there was any evidence that would change his mind about the decision. City Council Minutes September 6, 2000 Page 10 Councilmember Willlares stated she felt this was an awkward situation because she is not an expert in this field. Mr. Georgiou stated he just wants the law that applied at the time. Councilmember Curatalo stated he would like to have a chronology of the events and have the City Attorney review them to see if there is anything he feels needs to be added. Councilmember Dutton stated he would like a comparison grid of what was in effect then and now. He stated he would like the action taken at the special meeting included in the report. MOTION: Moved by Biane, seconded by Williams to continue this matter to the next meeting to hear all the facts about this matter. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING No items were identified for the next meeting except the issue as reported at the Redevelopment Agency meeting about the dumping off of Etiwanda north of Highland. K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC No communication was made from the public. L. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Alexander asked that everyone keep Duane Baker in their thoughts and prayers as he recently lost his Mother. MOTION: Moved by Dutton, seconded by Biane to adjourn to Tuesday, September 12, 2000 for a joint meeting with the Library Board of Trustees. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. The meeting adjourned at 8:57 p.m. Respectfully Submitted, Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk Approved: * STATE OF CALIFORNIA · BUSINESS, TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY GRAY DAVIS, Governor DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ~ DISTRICT 8, 464 WEST 4TH STREET, 6TH FLOOR jAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA 92401-1400 TDD (909) 383-6300 (909) 383-4563 March 6, 2000 The City of Rancho Cucamonga Attention: Jon Gillespie, Traffic Engineer 10500 Civic Center Drive P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 *"' ' Subject: Inspection of Overhead Signs Dear Mr. Gillespie: This is in response to your letter, dated February 16, 2000 to Anne Mayer, concerning the safety of our overhead sign structures. Please be assured that the Department takes extraordinary steps to ensure that all of our highways and facilities are designed, constructed, and maintained to minimize safety hazards to the public. Specifically for signs, this includes: · a design process that adheres to the most current design specifications · a construction process that requires fabricatom to construct signs in accordance with pre- approved welding procedures which must comply with the American Welding Society (AWS) Specifications D 1.1 · a combination of quality control measures taken by the contractor, and a quality assurance process, performed by the Department that ensures strict compliance with all construction and design specifications; and · a maintenance process that ensures the sign structure continues to perform as designed It is important to note after the sign collapse referenced in your letter, our design specifications and our review and alSproval of welding procedures have been strengthened. Again, I would like to stress that the Department is very concerned about the safety of the traveling public and will take all efforts to maintain this safety. If you have any questions please contact me at (909) 383-4563. SiOcere y, K C~SSNA District Division Chief Construction c: Anne Mayer ,. T H E C I T Y O F DANCHO CUCANONCz\ February 16, 2000 Ms. Anne Mayer District Division Cbief Design Caltrans District 8 464 W. 4m Street San Bernardino, CA. 9240 I SUBJECT: INSPECTION OF OVERHEAD SIGN STRUCTURES Dear Ms. Mayer, Tile City of Rancbo Cucamonga bas been contacted by Mr. Aubry Campbell, who has expressed his concern about tbe safety of overllead sign structures. In particular, Mr. Campbell is concerned abont the quality of tile welds and tile qualifications of the welders. In order to address these concerns, could yon please explain tile inspection and cerfification process that Caltrans uses in order to insnre that overbead sign structures are safe, and that welds will not fail. City of Rancbo Cucamonga staff first requested tbis information back in April of 1999. City staff made a second request on November 30, 1999. Copies of previous correspondence with Caltrans are attached. Mr. Campbell has indicated to City staff that the reason be is concerned abont the safety of overbead sign structures, is because one of tllese structures collapsed and killed bis son-in-taw. Mr. Campbell regularly attends City Conncil meetings, and has expressed bis concerns about the safety of overllead sign structures to the City Council. Mr. Campbell also contributes editorial articles to the "Grapevine Press", a local City newspaper with a circulation of 50,000. A copy of one of Mr. Campbell's editorials is attacbed. If you have any additional questions. please call me at (909) 47%2740, extension 4051. Sincerely, Community Development Department Engineering Division oll A. Gillespie, P.E cc. William J. O'NeiL City Engineeer Dennis Green. Cattrans Public Affairs 0216myer Mayor William J. Alexander ~ Councilmember Paul Biane Mayor Pro-Tern Diane Wil~iams Councilmember Bob Duffon Jack Lain, AICP, Cih/Manager Councilmember James V. Curatalo 10500 Civic Center Drive · RO, Box 807 * Rancho Cucamon,aa CA 91729 · [909] 477-2700 * FAX [909] 477-2849 www.ci.rancho-cucamonga.ca.us GRAY DAVIS. Governor STATE OF CALIFORNIA - BUSINESS, TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY , . DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ~ DISTRICT 0S. Constmc~on Phone (909) 989-4053 April29,1999 08-SBd-15,30-7.1/10.1,R10.0fR13.1 08-204304 AC/M-ACNHI-015-5 (139)114N, ACNH-S030(026)N In Fontana & Rancho Cucamonga from 0.4 mi N of Baseline to 1.3 mi N of Cherry (Fwy to Fwy I/C) Mr. 3'on Gillespie Traffic Engineer City ofRancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729-0807 Subject: Sign Structures for the 15/210 Interchange and Summit Ave Interchange Dear Mr. Gillespie: Thank you for the inquiry about the installation of sign stmctares on the above-mentioned contract. Your request for the State to address the safety and reliability of the new sign structures has been forwarded to Dennis Green (Caltrans Public Relations/Affairs group in San Bemardino, CA). I have spoken with Dennis Green about this issue and he is currently looking into the matter. Mr. Green can be contacted at (909) 383-6291. If you have any questions, please contact me at (909) 989-4053. S~ely, Senior Resident Engineer cc: Dennis Green T H E C I T Y O F "RANCHO CUCAM"ONGA November 30, 1999 Mr. Nabil Fraywat Caltrans Resident Engineer 10700 Jersey Boulevard, Suite 450 Rancho Cucamonga, CA. 91730 SUBJECT: INSPECTION OF OVERHEAD SIGN STRUCTURES Dear Mr. Fraywat, The City has been contacted by a Mr. Aubry Campbell who has expressed his concern over the safety of overhead sign structures. In particular, Mr. Campbell is concerned about the quality of the welds and the qualifications of the welders. In order to address these concerns, could you please explain the inspection and certification process that Caitrans uses in order to insure that overhead sign structures are safe, and that the welds will not fail. If you have any additional questions, please call me at (909) 477-2740, extension 2324. Sincerely, Community Development Department Engineering Division on A. Gillespie, P.E. gineer cc. William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Shintu Bose, Deputy City Engineer Dennis Green, Caltrans Public Affairs Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager Mayor William J. Alexander ~ Councilmember Paul Blanc Mayor Pro-Tem Diane Williams Councilmember Bob Duffon Jack Lain. AICP. City Manager Councilmember James V. Curatalo 10500 Civic Center Orive · P.O. BoxS07 · I~anchoCucarnonga. CA91729 · (909)477-2700 , FAX(909)477-2849 CZTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LZST OF WARRANTS FOR PERZOO: 09-13-00 CO0/Ol) RUN DATE: 09/13/00 PAGE: 1 VENDOR NAME ZTEN DESCRZPTTON WARR NO WARR. ANT. ~ CHECKR OVERLAP 12658 WHEATONe HANDY RECREATTON REFUND 1551530 21.00- ((< 155156 - 155290 367 LEAGUE OF CALTFORNTA CZTZES FTNANCZAL MGNT, NEETZNG I 1552910 715,00- ((< 155292 - 155745 2958 UMPS ARE US ASSOCZATZON UNP SERVTCES I 155766~ 3m060.OO ((< 155767 - 156196 6691 M M A S C NENBERSNTP 1561970 65°00 I <(( 156198 - 156199 22291 26 HOUR FZTNESS OVERPAYMENT 156200 132o00 6635 A & K PHOTOGRAPHY PHOTO OEVELOPZNG & SUPPLTE$ 156201 10,71 I 6651 A A AUTONOTZVE RECREATTON REFUND 156202 88,00 962 A T ~ T MONTHLE TELEPHONE DZLLTNGS # 156203 8,06 6271 ABBEY EVENTS SERVTCES RECREATTON SUPPLTES 156206 52o50 2732 ABC LDCKSHZTNS NATNTENANCE $UPPLZES · 156205 225°38 4367 ACCURATE SMOGe AUTOt TRUCK & VEHZCLE NAZNTENANCE/SUPPLTES I 156206 99,98 6309 ADAMSON, RONALD TNSPECTTON SERVZCE5 · 156207 le366,00 i 211 ADT SECURTTY SERVTCESt ZNCo ALARM SERVZCE R 156206 407,78 5509 ATR CONTROLLED ENVTRONNENTS PROFESSTONAL SERVZCES 156209 68,00 5509 ATR CONTROLLED ENVTRONMENT5 PROFESSTONAL SERVTCES 156210 10113,75 22286 ANERZCAN HERITAGE FINANCZAL CORPo OUSTMESS LTCENSE REFUND 156211 14o16 22 ANERZCAN PUBLTC WORKS ASSOCTATZON APNA MENeERSNZP 156212 110,00 243E ASSOCIATED GROUP MONTHLT MAXNTENANCE SERVTCE I 156213 1,800,00 ) ((< 156216 - 156215 6115 AUFBAU CORPORATION PLAN CHECK SERVICES R 156216 669427,50 ZZZR~ AVZNAe CHRTS RECREATTON REFUND 156217 12o50 # 4102 O g K ELECERTC WHOLESALE NAZNTENANCE SUPPLTES t 156218 545,61 33 8ASELZNE TRUE VALUE HARDWARE HAZNTENANCE SUPPLZES 156219 33.61 6441 BEST BUE CO, s ZNCo OFFTCE SUPPLTES 156220 96,96 · 2Z288 BHAVSARt TNDTRA RECREATTON REFUND 156221 ZO0,O0 6754 OZLL°S FENCE CO, SENS NEETTNG I 156222 835,00 6438 BLACK VOTCE NEWS# THE RECREATTON REFUND 156223 312o00 ~ 1247 BLAKE PAPER CO., ZNCo RECREATZON SUPPLZES 156224 56,64 5866 BODY CONCEPT EXERCZSE EQUXPMENT 156225 109,82 ZZZ90 OQNSUTTO, ROBERT & LZNDA RECREATZOM REFUND 156226 30.00 5362 BOTTLE-FREE MATER COMPANY, TNCo FZLTERS 156227 924.32 22292 BRXONES, CXNDY RECREATZON REFUND · 156228 415.00 ((( 156ZZ9 - 156Z30 ) 4369 BRODART BOOKS LZBRARV SUPPLZE$ I 156231 2,134,09 22287 BSNUG CIO CTTY OF AURORA REGESTRATZON 156232 520.00 4410 BURNS ZNTERNATTONAL SECURITY PROFESSTONAL SERVXCES I 156233 3,317.31 · 5746 BUSXNESS $PECZALTZE$ MAXNTENANCE $UPPLXES · 156Z36 16,109.80 6603 CALXFORNXA PAVEMENT NAZNT CO., XNC pAVEMENT MGMT CONTRACT 156235 21,003o69 488 CHEVRON U S A, ZNC GASOLZNE CHARGES 156236 113,79 h 6655 CXTY TREASURE· FOR THE CENTRE RECREATZON REFUND i 156237 22,682o04 6215 CN SCHOOL SUPPLE RECREATZON SUPPLXES 156258 95,82 4211 COAST RECREATZON, ZNC. MATNTENANCE SUPPLTES I 156239 6,540.18 6119 CONPETITZVE EDGE CyCLERY EQUTPMENT REPATR · 156260 77,28 6A3 COMPUTEBLAND CONPUTER MATNTENANCE/SUPPLTES 156261 3,084.88 4Z08 CONCEPT PONDER COATZNG MAZNTENANCE $UPPLTES 156262 76,00 6711 CORPORATE PRZNTER$ BUSZNESS LTCENSE REFUNDS 156263 127.72 5369 CREATTVE MANAGEMENT SOLUTZON8 pROFESSTONAL SERVTCES 156246 360,00 CiTY OF RANCHQ CUCANONGA LiST OF MARRANTS FUR PERZOD; 09-13-00 COOlOt) RUN DATE: 09/13/00 PAGE: 2 VENDOR NANE ZTEN DESCRIPTION NARR NO MARRo ANT. ~;0 CNECil OVERLAP 85 CUCANONGA CG MATER OIST NONTHLT MATER BILLINGS 0 156245 266.08 105 DAN GUERRA S ASSOCIATES CONTRACT SERVICES I 156246 32,795.00 6302 DEAN, 1NCo, STUART CONTRACT SERVICES B 156267 5,950,00 4661 DEL NECHANXCAL SERVZCE ~ REPAZR 156268 128.14 · 41391 DENVER NARRXOTT HOTEL HalEL RESERVATXONS 156240 324.E0 107 DETCO OFFXCE SUPPLXES B 156250 98°05 839 DXETERZCH'XNTERNATXDNAL TRUCK VENZCLE NAZNTENANCE 156251 32.05 & 5144 DXRECTV SUBSCRXPTXON 156252 58.85 41091 ENLENBURG, JACKXE RECREATXON REFUND 8 156253 T6.00 3564 EXGNTH AVENUE GRAPHZCS OFFXCE SUPPLXES 156256 499.91 ) 5137 ENPXRE NOOXLE HONE SERVXCE PRQFESSXONAL SERVXCES 8 156255 1,610o50 4159A ENRZGNT PLUREZNG PERNiT DEPOSIT REFUNO 156256 1,000.00 41392 ESCOBAR, GERSON RECREATION REFUND I 156257 610,00 2349 ESGZL CORPo PROFESSZQNAL SERVICES 156258 6,707.47 5262 EVANS SPORTZNG GOODS RECREATION SUPPLIES 156259 3T.OZ 5917 FASTENAL COHPANV NAZNTENANCE SUPPLIES I 156260 906.71 ~ 4R17 FATLAND, SANDRA REiMBURSERENT 156261 42o05 5944 FAVELA JR** RICHARD REZNBURSENENT 156262 161o31 124 FENCE CRAFT OF UPLAND, ZNCo NAZNTENANCE SUPPLIES I 156263 962.25 155 FILARSKT & NATT CONTRACT SERVICES 156264 1,062o50 5892 FIRST PLACE TROPHIES RECREATION SUPPLIES 156265 3,014.54 3088 FIRST STOP NGTORSPORTS, ZNC, VEHICLE NAZNTENANCE 156266 339°84 I 6371 FZSNER SCiENTiFiC NAZNTENANCE SUPPLIES 156267 477.61 41538 FISHER, SHERTL RECREATION REFUND 156268 11o60 6AAO FLUORESCO LZGNTXNG NAZNTENANCE SUPPLIES/SERVICE B 156269 1,525o22 # 6568 FONTANA MHCLESALE LUNBER MAINTENANCE SUPPLZES 156270 439.62 41313 FORTUNA, CONNZE RECREATZON REFUND 156Z71 30°00 6232 GADABOUT TOURS, ZNC RECREATION 156272 4,131,00 61893 GEORGE, DENNT & PNTLLZS PERNiT DEPOSIT REFUND 156273 1,800,00 6383 HoV, CARTER CO. BUSZNESS LZCENSE REFUND 156274 290.25 5699 HARALANBOS BEVERAGE CONPANT RECREAIZON SUPPLXES 156275 816.50 / 53138 HARRIS CONPANT MEETING 156276 80,00 462 NCS-CUTLER STEEL COo EQUIPMENT NAINTENANCE 156277 67,76 33134 ~NC RELEASE OF FUNDS 156278 171.00 1467 HOBART CORPORATION NAZNTENANCE SUPPLIES I 156279 116.25 158 HOLLZDAT ROCK CO** ZNCo NAZNTENANCE SUPPLIES B 156280 276,11 2255 HOLT'S AUTO ELECTRZC NAZNTENANCE SUPPLIES 156281 102o36 ) S234 HOSENAN MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 156282 258,60 161 HOVT LUNBER CO,, S.N, NAZNTENANCE SUPPLIES I 156285 992.55 1942 HTDRO TEK $VSTERS, ZNC, EQUZPNENT NA~NTENANCE 15628A 87°50 W 695 HTDRD-SCAPE PRODUCTS, 1NC LANDSCAPE NAZNTENANCE SUPPLIES I 156285 1,110,78 4188 Z D BURR NAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 156286 95°00 32290 iN-N-OUT BURGER CONTRACT SERVICE 156287 1,259.16 · 1121 iNDEPENDENT ELECTRONICS NAINTENANCE 156288 1,021o67 1210 INDUSTRIAL U/STRZBUTZON GROUP MAZNTENANCE SUPPLZES 156289 723o66 6429 iNLAND UNZPORNS RECREA;ZON.REFUND 156290 366,24 92 XNLAND VALLEY DAZLT BULLETIN SUBSCRIPTIONS I 156291 309o92 2507 ZNVENSYS BUZLOZNG STSTENS ZNCo SERV;CE/SUPPLZES 156292 10,109o00 6656 J · 0 SUPPLY CODe 1NCo RECREAIZDN REFUND 156293 12,257.6A 33140 JANES, KATHY CASH ADVANCE 156294 ZO0.O0 52043 JANECK, LZNDA REZNBURSENENT 156295 31.19 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LIST OF HARRANT$ FDR PERIOD= 09-13-00 (O01Ol) RUN DATE: 09/13/00 PAGE: 3 VENDOR NAME ETEH DESCRIPTION MARR NO WARM. ANT, ~g~ CHECKI OVERLAP 33144 JOSEPH R$SOCm CHARLES RELEASE OF FUNDS 156296 335.00 6757 K MART BUSINESS L~CENSE REFUND 156297 58.58 33133 KAHN, KARLERE RECREATION 6 156298 420,00 5654 KAPCO LIBRARY SUPPLIES 156299 593.42 · 48Z2 KARATSUe ROBERT REIMBURSEMENT 156300 6,99 2Z20 KELLY PAPER COMPANY PAPER SUPPLIES I 15630~ 109.36 149 KZNGB L,D. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 156302 14e900.76 i 1024 KOCH NATERIALS COMPANY HAZNTENANCE SUPPLIES 156303 115,25 6090 KDNG, SOPHAK BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 156304 360,00 1075 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY HAXNTENANCE SUPPLIES t 156305 172.68 i 193 LAZRD CONSTRUCTION CO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 8 156306 49,015o17 6605 LAU, DAZVD RECREATION REFUND 156307 368.69 33115 LAVOIEe SANDY RECREATION 156308 20,00 33137 LEON, DOREEN RECREATION 156309 40.00 33161 LEONARD, SHARON CASH ADVANCE 156310 200.00 5884 LXLBURN CORPDRATION PRDFESSZDNAL SERVICES I 156311 6,332.91 5662 LOS ANGELES COCA COLA BTL. C0. RECREATION SUPPLIES 156312 155o73 3156 LU*S LIGHTHOUSE, XNC. OIL ANALYSIS 156313 316,97 33136 MACXAS, QRALXA RECREATION 156314 Z6oOO 72 MARK CHRISt XNCo VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES B 156315 54.80 1028 NCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CONMANY MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I 156316 382,03 3999 NCNELCO PRODUCTS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I 156317 3,316o55 ~ 4164 MIDDLESEX OFFICE SUPPLY, XNCo HAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 156318 181.96 5852 HIDNEST TAPE LIBRARY SUPPLIES # 156319 119,96 3560 MOBILE HXNX, XNCo STORAGE SUPPLIES e 156320 261.84 i 6169 MORALES, MICHAEL BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 156321 40.95 1171 MOTOROLA COKHUNo & ELEC. e XNC MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES t 156322 4,917o43 842 MOUNTAIN VIEN SMALL ENG. REPAIR MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 156323 48.90 2248 NAPA AUTO PARTS VEHICLE HAXNTENANCE t 1563Z4 1,158.04 6687 NATION'S RENT SETTLEMENT OF CLAIM 156315 67,56 744 NATIONAL DEFERRED DEFERRED CQHP 156326 2,412o00 j 6768 NELSON SOUNDe XNC BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 156327 617o63 633 NXXON-EGLX EQUZPNENT VEHICLE MAINTENANCE I 156328 2e162.22 5428 NOLO PRESS LIBRARY SUPPLIES 156329 81.07 33143 OCEAN NEST FUNDENG BUSINESS LLXCENSE 156330 23.00 523 OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE SUPPLIES I 156331 1,140.57 6122 OPEN APP$* RECREATEON REFUNDS 156331 1,445.00 ~ 235 OMEN ELECTRIC MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES B 156333 4,640,38 1441 PACIFIC BELL MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 156334 1,103o01 6668 PAINTING THE TOMN RECREATION REFUND 156335 12e470,00 p 818 PARAGON BUILDING PRODUCTS XNCo CONCRETE SUPPLIES I 156336 224.58 6597 pAVEMENT RECYCLENG SySTEN RECREATION REFUND 156337 950.00 21061 pENINSULA LIBRARY SYSTEM LIBRARY SUPPLIES 156338 50.OO · 5720 PERVO PAINT CO. HAZNTENANCE SUPPLIES 156339 606°63 6148 PIRON, $HAUN CONTRACT SERVICES 156360 138.00 ZS5 POMA DISTRIBUTING CO VEHICLE MAINTENANCE & SUPPLIES I 156361 26,396.31 693 pONERSTRZDE BATTERY CO., INC. VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 15636Z 63,52 TS8 pRAXAZR DISTRIBUTEONe XNC, MAINTIRECREATION SUPPLIES I 156343 64.88 583 pROTECTION SERVICE INDUSTRIES PRDTECTION SERVICES-LIONS CNTR I 156344 Ze497.09 65 pRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I 156345 14,82 6664 pSOHAS RECREATION REFUND 156346 2,986°20 CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LiST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 09-13-00 COO/Q1) RUN DATE: 09113100 PAGE: 6 VENDOR NAME iTEM DESCRiPTiON NARR NO WARR. ANT. ~ CHECKt OVERLAP 6335 PUBLIC AGENCY RiSK SHARING AUTH CA. END QUARTER PREMZUH OEPOSZT a 156367 59,651,00 4460 PUTNAN, BiLL WANG COMPUTER SERVICE 156368 21o62 6569 QUXNN, SHERLZNE OUSXNESS LICENSE REFUND 156369 262.50 959 RADIO SNACK ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 156350 295°09 266 RALPH$ GROCERY COMPANY RECREATZON SUPPLIES 6 156351 139.30 Z6OO RANCHO CUCANDNGA FiRE DiSTRiCT SALARY AND BENEFITS 8 156352 468,90 565 RED MIND SHOE STORE SAFETY OOOTS 8 156353 1,616.97 I 5914 REXEL CALCQN ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES I 156354 910.81 6601 RHINO LiNiNG OF RANCHO CUCANQNGA BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 156355 471o31 12789 RZOS, NONA BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 156356 60,00 # 276 RiVERSiDE BLUEPRINT PRINTS I 156357 544.68 3316 RODZNSON FERTiLiZER LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES 156358 377,63 626 RDBLES, RAUL P., 58o TiRE REPAIR 8 156359 482,50 I2790 ROBO ONE PLUMBING BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 156360 leOOO.OO 6576 RQLATAPE CORPORATION REIMBURSE FOR WORK BOOTS 156361 509.21 12791 ROUTLEDGE, TAYLORtFRANCIS BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 156362 96.26 ; 12797 SAD RANCHO CUCAMONGA PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 156363 Z,60O.O0 5538 SAN ANTONIO MATERIALS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 156366 56.92 581 SAN BERN COUNTY CAL-ZO PROGRAM 156365 55,00 ~ 6606 SCHNEIDER, DANIEL RECREATION REFUND 156366 1105 SEAL FURNITURE 6 SYSTEMS INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES I 156367 1,523.00 1Z792 SHZBLEY, LiSA BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 156368 265.00 6Z52 SIERRA SPRINGS BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 156369 116o00 351 SiGN SHOP, THE MAiNT SUPPLIES I 156370 95.68 12793 SIMON, MAUD SUBSCRiPTiON 156371 30.00 ~ 1327 SMART & FINAL DAy CAMP SUPPLIES 8 196372 54Z.99 36 SNZDERLE, BEA PETTY CASH - COMMUNITY SvC$ 8 156373 123,12 3946 SMITH COMPANY MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 156376 866,85 · ((< 156375 - 156375 317 SO CALZF EDISON COo MONTHLY ELECTRIC BiLLiNGS I 156376 83,866.06 317 SO CALIF EDISON CO, MONTHLY ELECTRIC BiLLiNGS 156371 148,76 ~ 317 SO CALZF EDISON CO. MONTHLY ELECTRIC BILLINGS 156378 57.66 319 SO CALZF GAS COMPANY MONTHLY GAS BILLS I 156379 1,7Zl.33 (¢< 156380 - 156380 >)) 1432 SOUTHERN CALiFORNia EDISON NDNTHLV ELECTRIC DILLS R 156381 18,403,Z6 5722 SPECTRA COMPANY LABOR AND SUPPLIES I 196382 16,663.00 6Z84 SPORT CHALET TEAM DiViSiON COMMUNITY SERVICES SUPPLIES 156383 3,875.12 ) 6663 SPORT SUPPLY GROUP, iNC. RECREATION SUPPLIES 156384 18.86 9OZ STATE OF CA,DEPARTMENT OF TRAMS TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINTENANCE I 156385 25,033.60 Z312 STATEHiDE RENT A FENCE, iNC, MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 156386 1,210.Z0 · 1313 STERLING TRUCK EQUIPMENT VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I 156387 718,08 6733 SUNRISE FORD AUTO SERVICE K SUPPLIES I Z56388 576.23 6611 $NEET'S CLEAN SHEEP RECREATION REFUND 156389 3,100.00 · 3942 TERNZNiX INTERNATIONAL MONTHLY PEST CONTROL SERVICE t 156390 705.00 12796 TREVIZO, HELEN RECREATION REFUND 156391 100.00 ' 3388 TRUGREEN - LANDCARE REGIONAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES I 156392 8,120.00 ~ ~558 U S GUARDS CO,, ZNCo SECURITY GUARD SERVICE I 156393 Z958 UMP$ ARE US ASSOCiATiON UMP SERVICES t 156396 3,200.25 <(( 156395 - 156395 ))) 3637 UNiFTRST UNIFORM SERVICE UNIFORM SERVICES I 156396 1,805.73 5601 UNIQUE MANAGEMENT SERVICES, iNC. MANAGEMENT SERVICES 156397 510.68 .} CZTY OF RANCHD CUCANQNGA LZST DF MARRANTS FOR PERZODi 09-13-00 (OO/Ot) RUN DATE: 09/13/00 PAGE: 5 VENDOR NAME ZTEN OESCRZPTZON NARR NO NARR. AMT. O~ CHECK/aVERLAP IZ798 VALLEDORe JOSZE DUSZNESS LZCENSE REFUND IS6398 35.00 <(( X56899 - 156400 137 VERZZON CALZFORNZA MONTHLY TELEPHONE DZLLZNGS 8 156401 lZQ3 VZSTA PAZNT NAZNT SUpPLlrES R 186402 1340 VORTEX ZNDUSTRIES NAZNT SERVZCE & REPAZRS 156~03 12798 HASHZNGTON, ALZCZA SUBSCRXPTZON 156404 65.00 6606 NATKZNSe LEE RECREATZON REFUND IS6405 ZZB NAXZEw KLEEN-LZNE CORP NAZNT $UPFLZE$ 6 ~86406 67Z7 NEST END NATERZAL SUPPLY RECREATZON REFUNDS 15640T ~66oZ6 55Z6 NEST CROUP PUBLZSHZNO 156408 Z~Z ItZLLDAN ASSOCZATE$ PROFESS:ONAL SERVZCE$ 186409 9J576.00 XZTB6 UZLLZAN$ BACKHOE SERVZCE OVERPUT DN PERNZT 894-5070 ~564Z0 ~tQO0oO0 5658 XPECT FZRST AZD ~ SAFETY SUPPLZES ~564~ 80°95 ZO21 YORK ZNDUSTRZES GRAFFZTI REMOVER I 156412 Iw4Z2o30 · ~ TDTAL 644~454.68 CITY OF RANCMO CUCAHONGA LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 08-20-00 C001013 RUN DATE: OD/2OlOO PAGE: 1 VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION UARR NO WARRe ANT, · ~ CHECKI OVERLAP Z847 STATE ENVIRONMENTAL NONToe ZNC, SERVICE AND SUPPLIES 154810 674,98- ((( 154811 - 155663 12750 REGNXERe JEAN BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 155664~ 12o00- ((( 155665 - 156412 33153 H & L CHARTER CO.e XNC NEETXNG 156413~ 325.00 · 2682 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE POSTAGE METER MONTHLY SERVICES 156614~ 4eSOO.O0 ¢(< 156415 - 156419 8 6635 A & K PHOTOGRAPHY PHQTO DEVELOPING & SUPPLIES 6 156620 15,56 I AA EQUIPMENT RENTALS CODe INC. VEHICLE HAXNTENANCE/SUPPLIES 156421 142o76 2732 ABC LOCKSMITHS NAXNTENANCE SUPPLIES I 156422 654°69 6309 ADAHSONe RUNALE INSPECTION SERVZCES t 156423 832o00 J 5509 AIR.CONTROLLED ENVSRONNENTS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 156424 SOoOO 3448 ALL WELDING NAXNTENANCE REPAIRS 156425 26Zo18 2644 ALPERT'S PRINTING OFFICE SUPPLIES 156426 204.95 1430 AMERICAN BUSINESS FORMS OFFICE SUPPLIES I 156627 4e157o82 5658 AMERICAN FIRST AXE SUPPLIES 1564Z8 37.56 452 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION APA MEMBERSHIP DUES I 156429 963°00 j 22301 ANDERSQNe J. DON DEPOSIT REFUND 156430 500°00 ZZJO3 ARNADAe PATRXCIA DEPOSIT REFUND 156431 500°00 <(< 156632 - 156432 )>) 667 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION VISA MONTHLY BILLINGS I 156433 31811.50 22294 ARSENAULT, LTNNE RECREATION REFUND 156434 Z9.OO 26 ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES I 156435 158090.OO J 22300 ATLAS-ALLIED DEPOSIT REFUND 156436 XeO00oOO ((¢ 156437 - 156437 6115 AUFBAU CORPORATION PLAN CHECA SERVICES i 156438 371532,50 J ((( 156439 - 156439 4102 B & K ELECTRZC UHOLESALE HAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I 156440 5,154o75 4475 BARNES S NOBLE LXERART SUPPLIES 156441' 291o89 5942 BARSTOOLS ETC. RECREATION SUPPLIES 156442 3.21 6748 BEARINGS A DRXVESe ZNC. HENBERSHZP DUES 156443 15.80 4441 BEST BUT CD,s XNCo OFFICE SUPPLIES 156444 409°43 ~ 22293 60CKe ROB CASH ADVANCE 156445 150o00 4369 ERgOART BOOKS LIBRARY SUPPLIES I 156446 109.97 22302 BUFALZNOe NICK REFUND PARKING CXTATXQN 156447 30°00 4410 BURNS INTERNATIONAL SECURITY PROFESSIONAL SERVICES I 156~48 2e211o55 1001 BURTRUNZCS OFFICE SUPPLIES I 156449 886.04 22299 C.P. CONSTRUCTZONe CO. DEPOSIT REFUND 156450 ltOOQ.OO J 1851 CAL UESTERN PAINT MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 156451 ZeOIO,31 5166 CALIFORNIA LIBCART ASSOCIATION CALIF LIBRARY ASSOC fiTGo 16645Z 2OO,OO · 5164 CALIFORNIA LIBRARY ASSOCIATION CALZF LIBRARY ASSOC MTG. 156653 265°OO · 5164; CALIFORNIA LIBRARY ASSOCIATION CALIF LXBRARY ASSOC MTGo 156456 337.00 5166 CALXFORNIA LIBRARY ASSOCIATION CALIF LXBRAR7 ASSOC fiTGo 156455 190o00 k 5166 CALIFORNIA LIBRARY ASSOCZATION CALIF LXBRART ASSOC MTG. 156456 ZZ5.OO 5166 CALIFORNIA LIBRARY ASSOCIATION CALXF LIBRARY ASSOC HTG. 256457 ZBOoOO 5164 CALEFDRNZA LXBRARY ASSOCIATION CALIF LIBRARY ASSOC NTG, 156458 265.00 6713 CALIFORNIA OVERNXGHT RECREATION REFUNDS 8 156459 46.00 6612 CALXFORNXA $TAT/ONERS RECREATION REFUND i 156460 48°46 6765 CON GDVERNNENTe ZNCo 8USXNESS LICENSE REFUND 156461 193.19 68 CENTRAL CITIES SXGNS e XNCo NAXNTENANCE SUPPLIES I 156462 646°50 6719 CENTRAL NXCRDFXLM RECREATXON REFUNDS 156463 55.95 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMQNGA LIST OF MARRANTS FOR PERIOD: OB-ZQ-OQ COO/Q1) RUN DATE: OB/ZQ/OQ PAGE: 2 VENDOR HAHE ITEM DESCRIPTION HRRR NO BARRo AMTo ~ :(nk CHECRI OVERLAP 12806 CHARRQNe DIRK DEPOSIT REFUND 156666 ZSO.OO 6052 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS ADVERTiSiNG FEE I 156665 Z,QZl. O8 6095 CHiLDCRAFT EDUCATION CORP. RECREATION REFUND 156466 11.14 73 CITRUS MOTORS ONTARIO, INC. VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES 0 156667 60170.66 76 CITY RENTALS EQUIPMENT RENTALISUPPLZES 156668 13,90 22296 CLARION HOTEL REGZSTRATIQN 156669 255,94 21297 CLARION!UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA REGZSTRATEON 156670 160.00 I 6Z79 CLARKe DEBORAH REIMBURSE FOR BUSINESS EXPENSE 156471 37.36 22295 CLIGNETTs OAROLYN RECREATION REFUND 156671 65.00 663 CQHPUTERLAND COMPUTER HAZNTENANCEISUPPLIE$ I 156673 33Z.90 2361 COMSERCO, INCo SERVZCEIREPAZRS 8 I56676 527.56 B 2Z298 CTZLT TRAINING REGISTRATION I 156675 1,320.00 (<( 156476 - 156677 · 85 CUCAMONGA CO NATER DZST HONTHLY MATER BZLLXNGS 8 156478 32,516.60 239 D 6 K CONCRETE CO STREET MAINTENANCE I 156479 3,675.38 Z51Z O A R E AMERICA D. AoR.E. HATEREAL I 156480 3e56Z.ZO 105 DAN GUERRA S ASSOCIATES CObTRACT SERVXCES I 156681 10.038.00 } 6734 DAVISe.CZNDY REIMBURSEMENT 156682 ZSO.OO 1ZOO DEER CREEK CAR MASH VEHICLE MAZNTENANCEISUPPLIE$ 156483 116.00 61395 DELATORRE, MARITZA RECREATZON REFUND I 156686 92.50 60 DELTA DENTRL DENTAL INSURANCE 156685 ZTe636.96 6366 OEMCOe INto OFFICE SUPPLIES 156686 16,90 6546 DICK, ERIC EMPLOYEE OF THE MONTH R 156687 75.00 ) 61069 DICKEY, HARTZN TRAVEL & HEETING5 156688 ZO0.OO 3364 EIGHTH AVENUE GRAPHICS OFFICE SUPPLIES 156689 ITS.Z1 3616 ELITE TaMiNG TORXNG SERVICE 156490 105.00 · 41396 EMBASSY SUITES AIRPORT HOTEL TRAVEL i HEETXNGS 156691 195.56 5t3T EMPIRE MOBILE ~QHE SERVICE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 156692 6e680.00 · 229 EUING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS IRRIGATION SUPPLIES 9 156693 2e281.50 5917 FASTENAL COMPANY MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 156496 6Zo03 126 FENCE CRAFT OF UPLANOe INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 156695 65.10 61397 FZANO, ROBERT REFUND 156496 lOT.OO ~ 186 FIELDNAN, ROLAPP & ASSOCIATES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 156497 3e049.16 Z909 FILTER RECTCLZNG SERVXCEe ZNCo MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 156498 140.00 4371 FISHER SCIENTIFIC HAZNTEMANCE SUPPLIES i 156499 176.14 6685 FOOTHILL BEVERAGE COHPNAY RECREATION SUPPLIES 156500 55.05 616Z FOOTHILL FAMILY SHELTER FAMILY SHELTER 156501 250.00 Z840 FORD OF UPLAND, XNC. VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 8 156502 1.959.71 J 98 FORD PRINTING 6 MAILINGe INC MAINTENANCE S OPERATIONS 156503 811.53 6771 FOREHOST PRODUCTIONS RECREATION REFUND 156504 151,51 108Z FRANKLIH COVET CO, OFFICE SUPPLIES e 156505 83.65 · 5833 FRITTS FORD EQUIPMENT 156506 35,Z77.30 6560 GALE GROUPe,TNE LIBRARY BOOKS 6 156507 372°37 J 5737 GAME ROOM GALLERY RECREATION SUPPLIES 156508 28°62 3356 GARCIAe VXVZAN NILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 156509 21.45 ' 4160I GARDNER, DAMN CONTRACT SERVICES 156510 39°00 1686 GENTRY ERaSe INCe PROGRESS PAYMENTS 156511 159e153o95 6465 GLOBAL EQUIPMENT CONPANT OFFICE EQUZPHENT 156512 497.55 61396 GONZALEZe CARLOS RECREATION REFUND 156513 135.00 41399 DOSSAGE, ROBIN RECREATION REFUND I 156516 92o00 3617 GREEN ROCK PGNEN EGUIPHENT MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I 156515 945.75 CXTY OF RANCHO CUCAHDNGA LZST OF BARRANTS FOR PERZOD: 09-20-00 COO/Q1) RUN DATE: 091ZOlOO PAGE: 3 VENDOR NAME ZTEM OESCRXPTZON WARM NO UARRo ANT, · 0 CHECK8 OVERLAP 61600 GREEN, DONNA RECREATZON REFUND 156516 105o00 6383 HoVo CARTER CO, DUSZNESS LZCENSE REFUND I 156517 462,76 2855 HAVEN NZNE G LZQUOR CO. SUB-CDNNZTTEE MEETENOS I 156518 210o15 33151 HERMANDEED STEPHANZE RECREATZON 156519 26°00 4724 HX-NAV SAFETYw ENC, HAZNTENANCE SUPPLZE5 I 156520 1,316oZZ · 6865 HZLLSIDE COHHUNITY CHURCH MONTHLY RENT 156521 1667 HOBART. COOPORATXON HAZNTENANCE SUPPLXES 156522 i 158 HOLLZDAY ROCK COo, XNC° NAZNTENANCE SUPPLIES I 156523 611o53 6587 HOLMES 6 NARVERe ZNC. RECREATXON REFUND 15652A 65092.00 Z255 HOLT'S AUTO ELECTRXC NAZNTENANCE SUPPLZES I 1565Z5 183o18 ((( 156526 - 156526 ~ 4033 HONE DEPOT CREOZT SERVZCE HAXNTENANCE SUPPLZES 6 156517 29029o87 33167 HONES9 NLe LLCo HZSC 156528 1,876o60 1234 HOSENAN HAXNTENANCE SUPPLZES I 156529 95°07 695 HYDRO-SCAPE PRODUCTS° ZNC LANDSCAPE HAZNTENANCE SUPPLZES 8 156530 710o24 6188 I O BURR HAZNTENANCE SUPPLZES 156531 26°06 4254 ZBN CDRPDRATXON HAXNTENANCE SUPPLZES 156532 210o00 J 908 ZNLAND NEDZATZON BOARD LANDLORD/TENANT DISPUTE RESOLD i 156533 teDDY°)7 2315 ZNLAND aNGLESALE NURSERY HAZNTENANCE SUPPLZES 156534 140o07 3652 ZNTRAVAZA ROCK 6 SAND MAINTENANCE 5UPPLXE$ 156535 30°00 2507 ZNVENSYS BUXLDZNG SYSTEMS ZNCo SERVXCE/SUPPLXES 156536 10,109o00 5616 ISA HENBERSNZP i 156537 Z70oOQ ~ 1561 JACOBSEN DXVZSXON OF TEXTRDN; ZNCo HAXNT SUPPLZES 8 156538 275.36 6565 JOHNSON, CHARLOTTE SUBSCRXPTZDN RENENAL 156539 407,00 33166 JOSEPNe 5TEPHANZE RECREATZON 256560 155°00 179 KAZSER FDUNDATZON HEALTH PLAN NEDZeAL ZNSURANCE 156561 31t368o61 ~ 6676 KELLE¥s KRZStY RECREATZON REFUND 156562 150o00 6676 KELLET, KR15TT RECREATZON REFUNO 156543 33135 KELLNERe ERZC REFUND I 156566 167o95 5059 KINKQ°S COPZE$ RECREATZON SUPPLZE$ 156565 93°76 1024 KOCH HATERZALS CONPANT MAXNTENANCE SUPPLXES 156566 19541.69 GOgO KONGe SOPHAK 8USZNESS LXCENSE REFUND 1565AT 680°00 ~ 6582 KORANDA CON$TRUCTZON CoOoBoGo 156568 5565 LS A ASSOCEATES, ZNCo PROFESSZONAL SERVZCES I 156569 5,738o69 193 LAZRD CQNSTRUCTZON CO PRDFESSZONAL SERVXCES 156550 500.00 ((( 156551 - 156551 321 LANDSCAPE HESTt INto LANDSCAPE HAZNTENANCE I 156552 1728181°83 865 LAUSON PRO DUCTSe TNC, HAZNTENANCE SUPPLXES I 156553 381.87 j 191 LEAGUE OF CALXFORNZA CZTZES ANNUAL DUES 156556 580o00 33150 LEAVZTTe TZNA RECREATXON 156555 156o00 979 LEUXS OPERATZNO CORP. REFUND OF DEVELOPHENT FEES 156556 19.60 · 33165 LIAO, FRED RELEASE OF DEPOSXT 156557 884°00 5684 LZLBURN CORPORATEON PROFESSZONAL SERVXCES I 156558 5eSTGoOO · 2068 LETTLE TEKE$ CDHHERCZAL PLAY SY$ MAZNTENANCE SUPPLZE$ 156559 157.15 1655 LONG'S DRUGS FZLN pROCESSEND 156560 9°69 5662 LOS ANGELES COCA COLA BTL. CO. RECREATZON SUPPLXE$ 156561 Z6O.6Z 569 NARXPOSA HDRTZCULTURAL ENToZNCo LANDSCAPE MAXNTENANCE i 15656Z 3,325o65 12 HARK CNRIS, ZNCo VENZCLE HAZNTENANCE SUPPLZES I 156563 230°75 6727 HARSHALL PLUMBZNG REHABo PROGRAM i 156564 985°26 ZSO NARTXNEZ TORXNG AND AUTOHOTXVE TOMEND SERVZCE$ d 156565 385.00 3871 MATT~S HARDMARE NAZNTENANCE SUPPLZE$ I 156566 51o10 CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMQNGA LiST OF MARRANTS FaR PERIOD: 09-Z~OQ COOIOl) RUN DATE: 09/20/00 PAGE: VENDOR NAflE ITEM DESCRIPTION MARR NO HARM. AflT. ;Q CfiECKI OVERLAP 6085 NCARDLE, KEVXN BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 156567 10.00 33135 NCflANEw GARY RECREATION 156568 75.00 OtTO flICROAGE CDNPUTERNART I904 CTE DUES 156569 78.68 6214 MICROAGE COMPOTERNART RECREATION REFUND 8 t56570 1,769.03 SBSZ flZOHEST TAPE LIBRARY SUPPLIES 0 Z56571 239.92 33149 MZSAC DOES 156572 XBO.O0 5860 MOBILE NXNX, INCa STORAGE SUPPLIES e 156573 Z61.86 I 175A MOORE, DAVE REXMR./FOUNDERS DAY SUPPLIES IS6574 ZO0,O0 35i52 NORRISON, JOGXE RECREATION 156575 SO.O0 862 flOUNTAIN VXEN SMALL ENG. REPAZR MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 156576 63.95 50072 fit BALDY UNITED NAy RECREATION 156577 20.00 I 32367 NAHflNA REGISTRATION 156578 150.00 2268 NAPA AUTO PARTS VEHICLE MAINTENANCE I 156579 690.56 · 6766 NATIONAL NEIGHBORHOOD MATCH INST. LOCAL PERflIT STREAMLiNiNG MTG I56580 186.8A 33169 NEVEDA PRZMA flEETING 156581 100,00 3600 NXELSENe NETTIE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 156582 200.00 653 NXXON-EGL1 EQUIPMENT VEHICLE MAINTENANCE I 156583 571o19 ) 6732 NORTH COAST MEDICAL RECREATION REFUNDS I 156586 318)7 OAKSTONE LEGAL 6 805. pUBLICATiON SUBSCRIPTION 256585 2w183o95 6853 OCLCe INCa CORE SERVICES CHARGES 156386 125,00 ((( 156587 - 156587 S25 OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE SUPPLIES 8 156588 AIAZ ONTARIO HZNNELSQN CO, MAINTENANCE REPAIRS 156580 19o62 ) 5661 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDHARE NAINTERANCE SUPPLIES 156590 9.86 <(( 156591 - 156581 ))) 235 OMEN ELECTRIC HAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I 156592 6,762o52 P 876 PACHON, PAULA RECREATION REFUNDS 156593 ZOO.Q0 6287 PACIFICARE OF CALIFORNIA RECREATZOfl REFUND 15659A 36,568.51 · 5609 PARTSNASTER, ZNC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 156595 507.35 757 PEP BaYS VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 156596 STZO PERVO PAINT CO. flAINTENANCE SUPPLIES t 15659T 2,067.29 6205 PETERNAN LUMBER EARTHQUAKE PREPAREDNESS KIT i 156598 29i.19 ) 6146 PIRDN, 5HAUN CONTRACT SERVICES 156599 186.00 ZTZ PITNEY BONES POSTAGE HETER RENTAL 156600 327.35 255 POflA DISTRIBUTING CO VEHICLE MAINTENANCE A SUPPLIES I 156601 1,983.97 3952 POMONA INL VALLEY CNCL OF CHURCHES UEST END HUNGER PROGRAM 15660Z 439.00 693 paNEASTRIDE BATTERY CO., INC. VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 156603 103.35 758 PRAXAXR DISTRIBUTION, INCa NAINTIRECREATIQH SUPPLIES 8 156606 164,24 ) 33142 pRECISION BUILT pOOLS RELEASE OF DEPOSIT 156605 250.00 65 pRUDENTIAL DYERALL SUPPLY flAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I 156606 16,82 5899 QUALITY ONE ENGRAVERS OFFICE SUPPLIES 15660T 16.16 · 6565 QUZNNe SHERLZNE BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 156606 336.88 ((( 156609 -- 156609 ))> k Z51 R L R AUTONaTIVE VEHICLE MAINT,SUPPLIESGSERVICE I 156610 5e095.96 545 R D O EQUIPMENT CO/POHERPLAN flAXfiT SUPPLIES I 156611 2,658.56 'IZ799 RiB RAINBObS RECREATION REFUND 156612 ltOOO.OO 11357 RADISSON HOTEL SACRAMENTO CONFERENCE, HOTEL RESERVATIONS 156613 792.96 118Z6 RAILS-TO-TRAILS CONSERVANCV SUBSCRIPTION 156616 ZO.OO 70 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAflBER NEflBERSHIP MEETING 156615 50.00 70 RANGfig CUCAflDNGA CHAffBEN HEMBERSHXP NEETXNG 156616 100,00 1ZTSO REGNXERe JEAN BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 156617 IZ.OO CITY OF RANCHO CUCANQNGA LIST QF MARRANTS FOR PERIOD; QO-ZO-OO COOIOl) RUN DATE: OO/ZO/QO PAGE: 5 VENDOR NINE ZTEM DESCREPTZON NARR NO HARR, ANT, ~ CHECKI OVERLAP 128i4 RJP GENERAL CONTRACTING RECR EATION REFUND 1566t8 3314 ROBINSON FERTILIZER LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES 8 156619 2e720,75 626 ROBLESe RAUL Poe SR. TIRE REPAIR 5 156620 195.00 16 ROTARY CORPDRATZON NAZNTENANCE SUPPLIES 156621 Z0o98 5324 R,THe FREDRZCKe PH.D. CONSULTING FEES I 15662Z 38768.00 · 1Z800 ROTHt LANi RECREATION REFUND 156623 115,00 1292 S & S ARTS AND CRAFTS RECREATION SUPPLIES 15662A 16,53 B 4638 S C A C E 0 ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP DUES 156625 40~100 12813 SALCEDO, LOUANA RECREATION REFUND 156626 33.00 5538 SAN ANTONIO MATERIALS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 156627 87°53 j 581 SAN BERN COUNTY CAL-ZD PROGRAM 156628 55.00 581 SAN BERN COUNTY CAL-ZD PROGRAM I 156629 58039.62 150 SAN BERN COUNTT PUBLIC HEALTH DEFT. ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES 156630 60,850°00 30i SAN BERN COUNTY SHERIFFS CONTRACT SHERIFFS SERVICE I 156631 8508524.00 1280Z SCaLERiB GAZL RECREATION REFUND 156631 51,00 12801 SD SU FDUND'ATIONICCCZP RECREATION REFUND 156633 320.00 ~ 12803 SEA LODGE HOTEL RECREATION REFUND 156634 414.39 1105 SEAL FURNITURE & SYSTENS ZNCo OFFICE SUPPLIES i 156635 100e476.57 6252 SXERRA SPRINGS BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 156636 114000 12506 SIGNUND-YUHAS, ELIZABETH RECREATION REFUND 156637 150.00 · 351 SIGN SHDPt THE MAZNT SUPPLIES I56638 53.88 ((( 156639 - 156649 ))) I 1432 SOUTHERN CALXFORNXA EDXSON MONTHLY ELECTRIC BILLS e 136650 119338,45 12806 SPECZAL DISTRICTS iNSTITUTE OVERPATNENT ON 8USoLZC. 156651 545.00 3017 STATE OF CALIFORNIA UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE 156651 841.00 3017 STATE OF CALXFORNZA UNEMPLOYMENT XNSURANCE 156653 30,00 ~ 3632 STEELNORKEBS OLDTXNERS FOUNDATION OLDTIMERS FOUNDATION I 156656 1e73Z.25 5281 STERXCYCLEe XNCo SHARPS PROGRAM I 156655 312,10 6131 SUPER pCNENORY pUBLZCATEON I 156656 2,566,28 5410 T & g INSTALLATIONS SUPPLIES 156651 754,36 2344 TARGET TOUTH PROGRAM t DAY CAMP SUPPL I i56658 110.77 6159 TECHNOLOGY SERVICES CONSULTING GRP BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 156659 9,183o61 ) lZ807 TEDESCDe PHYLLIS L,A, ZNAUGURAL TALGD TRAIN RIDE I 156660 51,00 3942 TERMXNXX INTERNATIONAL MONTHLY PEST CONTROL SERVICE I 156661 108,00 12808 T'ODe NENDY RECREATION REFUND Z56662 38.00 2737 U C REGENTS POCKET GUIDE 156663 432°00 2737 U C REGENTS POCKET GUIDE 156664 640.00 5t55 U S BANK TRUST LEASE PAYMENT t i56665- 9e8OOeOg j 6060 U S T NONXTOR REPAIR RECREAIION REFUND I 156666 5f128o75 2958 UNP$ ARE US ASSOCIATION UNP SERVICES I 156667 Ze452,75 3637 UNXFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE UNIFORM SERVICES 8 156668 28574.91 I 5601 UNIQUE MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. MANAGENENT SERVXCES 156669 267.01 5520 UNIQUE PAVING MATERIALS OF CA.tZNC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 156670 ZZ6.Z8 · 1226 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE UPS SERVICE I 156611 65o17 12809 URTZe KEVXN RECREATION REFUND 156672 108,00 681 VANCE CORPORATION BASELINE ROAD BIDERING I 156673 1368073o19 ((( 156674 - 156675 ))) 137 VERXZON CALIFORNIA NONTHLY TELEPHONE BILLINGS I 156676 le084o66 C(( 156677 - 156677 ))> 213 NAXIE. KLEEN-LINE CORP NAINT SUPPLIES I 156678 8.380,86 I1658 iREATONe RANDY RECREATION REFUND 156679 7.92 CZTY OF RANCHD CUCA~ONGA LZST DF uARRANTS FOR PERZDD: 09-20-00 COOl01) RUN DATE: 09/20/00 PAGE: 6 VENDOR NAME XTEM DESCRZPTZON WARR NO WARRo ANT, ;~ CHECKI OVERLAP 12810 IdZLLZAMSe FLOR RECREATZON REFUND 154,680 3)o00 IZ815 NXSOONe RXCHARD RECREATXON.REFUND 156681 500°00 1Z4,11 MOODS, NARXVEL RECREATZON REFUND 154,68Z 39,00 509 XEROX CDRPORATXON COPY NACHXNE SUPPLXES/$ERVXCE · 15666) 9,351o1A IZ81Z ZANORA, ADAM RECREATXDM REFUND 156684 102,50 34,8 ZEP NANUFACTURXNG COMPANY VEHTCLE NAXNT SUPPLXES 1564,85 73°89 ;~ TOTAL leOZOe65~,o03 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 4, 2000 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council, City Manager, Jack Lam, AICP FROM: Lawrence I. Temple, Administrative Services Director BY: Dawn Haddon, Purchasing Manager SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO DECLARE SURPLUS MISCELLANEOUS CITY- OWNED EQUIPMENT RECOMMENDATION That the City Council gives approval to surplus the City owned equipment on the attached listing, which is no longer needed, obsolete or unusable. BACKGROUND The City's purchasing manual identifies two major categories of surplus property: materials and supplies, and capital equipment. It is the policy of the City to request that the City Council provide authorization to the Purchasihg Agent to dispose of City property by declaring such items surplus. Methods of disposition can be transferred to another department, trade-in, sale by bid or auction, sale as scrap, donation, or simply trashing. As the replacement of various pieces of equipment has occurred, the miscellaneous items listed are surplus to the City's need and should be disposed of. Respectfully submitted, Lawrence I. Temple Attachments cc: Sharon Leonard VEH.# ASSET # 9ESCRIPTION LICENSE VIN # # 534 0558 1984 HUSTLER BAC VAC MOWER N/A 0561419 E5072 00980 EX MARK MOWER N/A 41830-119 656 1195 1990 LEAR-SIEG ARROW BOARD NONE 5275 537T 1340 1989 EXCEL JOBBER TRAILER E112392 EX9JSUT3KIEX9109 ???? 9999 TORO PUSH MOWER N/A 3902194 E5155 ??99 TORO PUSH MOWER N/A 6006879 E5096 00713 TORO PUSH MOWER N/A 3902641 N/A NONE ZEP PARTS WASHER N/A 3113394 N/A NONE ZEP PARTS WASHER N/A 3089579 551 ???? 1992 CUSHMAN UTILITY CART N/A 1UHNH4225PL000329 198 1322 1991 CHEVY G/20 CARGO VAN E346650 1GCEG25H6M7127585 597T ???? UTILITY TRAILER ???? 1K9UD15??FPM03366 333 1249 1991 FORD EXPLORER E286891 1FMCU22X2MUB96816 E5110 9?9? LINE SPRAYER N/A ILLEGIBLE 526 1231 JOHN DEERE GATOR UTILITY CART N/A W00626XOO3285 651 1218 1990 INTERNATIONAL AQUA TECH E267258 1HTGC26R5KH209676 120 1254 1991 CHEVY CAVAIJE, R E343001 1G1JC54G1MJ181361 218 1247 1991 FORD EXPLORER E286899 1FIVICU22X8MUC04742 635 1237 1990 FORD E-350 AERIAL VAN E267341 1FTJE34MOLHB504433 E6498 NONE PIONJAR HAMMER N/A 420530 N/A N/A 6- CROSS BED TRUCK TOOL BOXES N/A N/A /5 Quantity Description 1 TOSHIBA PERCEPTION (1) LCCU2 (1) NTWU2 (1) NPRU2 (1) NDSU2 (3) NEKU2 (2) NSTU2 (2) NCOU2 (1) NEMU2 (10) EKT 6520 - SD (1) EKT6510-H (3) HDSS 6560 ACTIVE VOICE REPLAY SOFTWARE VERSION - 6.60R1 4 PORTS/18 HOURS Bid Amount: $ 1 TOSHIBA STRATA VIe (6) PORTS FOR CO. LINES (8) PORTS FOR ELECTRONIC STATIONS (6) EKT 6510 - H Bid Amount: $ 1 TOSHIBA STRATA VIe (6) PORTS FOR CO. LINES (8) PORTS FOR ELECTRONIC STATIONS (8) EKT 6510 - H Bid Amount: $ 1 TOSHIBA STRATA VIe (6) PORTS FOR CO. LINES (8) PORTS FOR ELECTRONIC STATIONS (4)EKT 6510 - H Bid Amount: $ 1 TOSHIBA DK-96 (3) PEKU1 (1) PCTU2 (2) PCOU2 (1) PEMU1 (8) PORTS FOR CO. LINES (4) PORTS FOR TIE LINES (24) PORTS FOR ELECTRONIC STATIONS (17) EKT 6510 - H Bid Amount: $ 1 TOSHIBA DK-24 (1) PCTU (3) PEKU1 (2) PCOU1 (8) PORTS FOR CO. LINES (24) PORTS FOR ELECTRONIC STATIONS (12) EKT 6510 ~ H Bid Amount: $ 1 TOSHIBA STRATA DK 280 (1) RCTUBA3 (1) RCTUBB3 (5) PDKU2 (1) RDTU2 (1) PCMU2 (16) DKT 2010 - H (7) DKT 2020 - SD (1) DKT 2004 - CB CENTRIGRAM VOICE MEMO SOFTWARE VERSION - R4.018 PORTS / 10 HOURS Bid Amount: $ 1 TOSHIBA STRATA DK 280 (1) RCTUA3 (2) PDKU2 (1) PSTU2 (2) PCOU2 (11) DKT 2010- H (2) DKT 2020 - SD (1) DKT 2004 - CB ACTIVE VOICE REPARTEE SOFTWARE VERSION - OS/2 V.7.20R3 8 PORTS/25 HOURS Bid Amount: $ TOSHIBA STRATA DK 280 (1) RCTUA3 (2) PDKU2 (1) PSTU2 (2) PCOU2 (12) DKT 2010 - H (2) DKT 2020 - SD ACTIVE VOICE REPLAY SOFTWARE VERSION - 2.50R2 4 PORTS/50 HOURS Bid Amount: $ 1 TOSHIBA PERCEPTION EX (1) NFnU2 (1) NFPU2 (1) LCCU2 (1) NT~,VU3 (1) NPRU2 (1) NSTU2 (5) NDKU2 (1) NEMU2 (2) NCOU2 (19) DKT 2010 - SD (11) DKT 2020 - SD (2) DDSS 2060 ACTIVE VOICE REPARTEE SOFTWARE VERSION - 6.50R2 4 PORTS/10 HOURS ,Bid Amount: $ 1 TOSHIBA PERCEPTION (I) LCCU2 (3) NTV(U3 (1) NPRU2 0) Ncou2 (1) NEMU2 (6) NTSU2 (2) NDKU2 ACTIVE VOICE REPLAY PLUS SOFTWARE VERSION -1.20R3F 4 PORTS/6.5 HOURS Bid Amount: $ I PERCEPTION E (2) NFDU2 (1) LCCW2 (1) NTWW3 (1) NPRW2 (1) NEKU2 (4) NDKU2 (1) NSTU2 (1) NEMU2 (2) NCOU2 (1) DATT102 ELECTRONIC CONSOLE (ATTENDANT CONSOLE) (1) DKT 2004 - CB1 (2) EKT 6000 - NM S/L (2) EKT 6000 - NT S/L (13)DKT 2010 - SD (5) DKT 2010_H (8) DKT 2020 - SD ACTIVE VOICE REPARTEE SOFTWARE VERSION - 6.30R1 4 PORTS/10 HOURS ACTIVE VOICE REPARTEE Bid Amount: $ 1 LEXOR 2000M (322) 2011 (70) 2021L NS (36) 2021L S (6) 2037L NS (1) 2037L S (8) BLF (4) AH CONSOLES RANC h O C U C A M O N GA ENGINE~I~INC, DEDAI~TM~NT Sg :fRe rt DATE: October 4, 2000 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Rex Whitney, Maintenance Supervisor SUBJECT: APPROVAL FOR THE REPLACEMENT OF TVVO PIECES OF EQUIPMENT, AN EXCEL 340 BAC VAC RIDING MOWER AND AN EXCEL 4400 BAC VAC RIDING MOWER, FROM C.R. JAESCHKE INC. OF SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA, TO BE FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT 72-4225-7044 FOR THE AMOUNT OF $48,740.41 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended the City Council authorize the replacement purchase of two pieces of equipment, a 1985 Excel 340 Bac Vac Riding Lawnmower and a 1992 Excel Bac Vac 4400 Riding Lawnmower with two 2000 Excel 4600 Bac Vac Riding Lawnmowers from C.R. Jaeschke Inc. of San Diego, California, to be funded from account 72-4225-7044 for the amount of $48,740.41. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: Over the last fifteen (15) years our existing Excel equipment has proven to be highly reliable and exemplary in the service they have provided. It is because of this past service record that staff recommends replacing our existing equipment with Excel equipment again. Staff has researched all of the other comparable equipment on the market through field testing and demonstrations and found none that equals the Excel product. We are assured that Excel equipment will provide us with the service we expect. Respectfully Submitted, N William J. O' ell City Engineer WJO:RW /7 RANC h O C UCAMON GA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT S ffReport DATE: October 4, 2000 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Rick Gomez, Community Development Director SUBJECT: REQUEST TO ENTER INTO COMMUNIATIONS SITE GROUND LEASE AGREEMENT AT RED HILL PARK BETWEEN LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, dba VERIZON WIRELESS BY AIRTOUCH CELLULAR AND THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FOR THE PURPOSE OF INSTALLING A WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITY FOR LOS ANGELES SMSA'S PERSONAL COMMUNICATION SERVICE RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Mayor sign this Agreement entering into this Communications Site Ground Lease Agreement. BACKGROUND Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership has been negotiating a Communications Site Ground Lease Agreement with City staff for the placement of an electronic transmission facility for their personal communication service at Red Hill Park. ANALYSIS Community Development staff, in conjunction with the City Attorney's office, has been reviewing several draft agreements over the past few months. A final Agreement has been approved by the City Attorney's office and contains the following key elements of the terms and conditions: Rent: The annual rent shall initially be fourteen thousand four hundred dollars ($14,400.00), paid in equal monthly installments, in advance, on the first of each month. On July 1 of each lease year and any extensions thereto, the Annual Rent shall increase by the C.P.I. (Consumer Price Index) of the then current Annual Rent in effect. This amount is above the standard annual rent amount of $12,000.00 to facilitate quick CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT GROUND LEASE AGREEMENT October 4, 2000 Page 2 abatement of potential graffiti to their communications equipment building that will be adjacent to the existing restroom facility. Access: Access to the premises shall be available to Lessee at all times, 24 hours per day, 7 days per week. Should there be special access circumstances, detailed procedures shall focus on these issues and on the need for Lessees to be able to access the Premises in case of emergency at any time. Respectfully 8ub~ Rick~o~ Community Development Director RG:dw CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ,, / STAFF REPORT DATE: October 4, 2000 ~ ~ TO: Mayor and Members of the City Cotmcil ~ ~ Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Duane A. Baker, Assistant to the City Manager SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH BEST, BEST AND KREIGER FOR BOND COUNSEL SERVICES 1N CONJUNCTION WITH A PROPOSED COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT (SOUTH ETIWANDA) IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $10,000 FOR FORMATION SERVICES AND NOT TO EXCEED $15,000 FOR DEBT ISSUANCE SERVICES. TO BE FUNDED BY THE PROJECT DEVELOPER. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached Professional Services Agreement with Best, Best & Kreiger to provide services as the bond counsel to the City in relation to a proposed Community Facilities District (CFD). The amount for these services will not exceed $10,000 for the formation phase and will not exceed $15,000 for the debt issuance phase. The total cost for these services will be paid by the developer requesting the formation of this CFD. BACKGROUND The proposed CFD is being requested by Pacific Communities to fired public improvements related to their development. The bond counsel works for the City to insure that the proposed district is being formed in accordance with all applicable laws and coordinates the preparation of agreements, documents and legal opinions to support district formation. The cost for the bond counsel is being paid by the developers who are requesting this CFD. Because there is no impact to the City financially and became of the need for an experienced bond counsel to assist in representing the City's legal interests, it is recommended that this Professional Services Agreement be approved. ~tt~ Duane A. Baker Assistant to the City Manager CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 4, 2000 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lan~, AICP, City Manager FROM: Duane A. Baker, Assistant to the City Manager SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH EMPIRE ECONOMICS TO PERFORM MARKET ABSORPTION SERVICES 1N CONJUNCTION WITH A PROPOSED COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTR/CT (SOUTH ETIWANDA) IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $12,500. TO BE FUNDED BY THE PROJECT DEVELOPER. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve a Professional Services Agreement with Empire Economics to provide market absorption services to the City in relation to a proposed Community Facilities District (CFD). The amount for these services will not exceed $12,500. The developers requesting the formation of this CFD ~vill pay the total cost for these services. BACKGROUND The proposed CFD is being requested by Pacific Communities to fund public improvemems to their development, which is generally located east of Etiwanda Avenue, west of East Avenue, and on the north and south sides of Miller Avenue. The market absorption study is necessary to insure that the property in question is economically viable and will be able to support the special tax for the CFD. The developer who is requesting this CFD is paying the cost for the market absorption study. Became there is no impact to the City financially and became of the need for a market absorption study of the proposed CFD to insure the financial viability of the CFD, it is recommended that this Professional Services Agreement be approved. Duane A. Baker Assistant to the City Manager RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINI~Et~ING DEPA~THENT DATE: October 4, 2000 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Linda R. Beek, Jr. Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION FOR TRACT 14120, -2 AND -3, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF VINTAGE DRIVE, WEST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE, SUBMI'I'I'ED BY MAR VISTA HOMES, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution. accepting the subject agreement extension and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreements. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: Improvement Agreements and Improvement Securities to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for Tract 14120, -2 and -3 were approved by the City Council on June 16, 1999. The developer, Mar Vista Homes. a California Corporation, is requesting approval of a 12-month extension on said improvement agreements. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extensions are available in the City Clerk's office. N William J. O' ell City Engineer WJO:LRB:Is ~-XUm~T "A" ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 7 ........... _~ L_ __'L. ! CITY OF rrEM: Tract 14120 RANCH0 CUCAMONGA TrrLE: Map ENGINEER~G DMSION EX~InlT: "A" RESOLt TION No. OO- / A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 14120, -2 AND -3 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on October 4, 2000, by Mar Vista Homes, a California Corporation, as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the on the south side of Vintage Drive, west of Etiwanda Avenue. WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said Tract 14120, -2 and 3; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEI~I~ING D~PADTHI~NT DATE: O~ober 4, 2000 ~: Ma~or anO Merebern o~ t~e Cit~ Council Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager ~lliam J. O'Neil, Cit~ ~nOineer BY: Linda R. Beek, Jr. ~nOineer ~U~E~: ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, R~L~SE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANC~ BOND AND FIL~ A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAP ~50~2, SUBMI~ED BY OLTMANS INVESTMENT COMPANY, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FOURTH STREET, B~EN BUFFALO AV~NU~ AND 1- 15 FREEWAY RECOMMENDATION: The required improvements for Parcel Map 15012, have been completed in an ac~ptable manner, and it is recommended that the City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond. BACKGrOUND/ANALYSIS; As a condition of approval of completion of Parcel Map 15012, located on the noah side of Fou~h Street, be~een Buffalo Avenue and 1-15 Freeway, the applicant was required to complete street improvements. The improvements have been completed and it is recommended that City Council release the existing Faithful Performance Bond. Developer: Oltmans Investment Company Release: Faithful Performance Bond Accept: Maintenance Bond City Engineer WJO:LRB:Is EXHIBIT 'A~ <;.~ /~.A, Rik40 bf?.tVF O ,,, . _ i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO Ex~t~t"r 'A" SLATE OF CALIFORNIA P.~, ~ot2 RESOLUTION NO. ~O - / q q A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAP 15012 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Parcel Map 15012, have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. d7 RANCHO CUCAMONGA EI~GII~EERII~G DEI~,~ttTMEI~T Staff Report DATE: October 4, 2000 TO:. Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Willie Valbuena, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4 FOR CUP 99-25, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BETVVEEN MILLIKEN AND ELM AVENUES, SUBMITTED BY WESTERN LAND PROPERTIES RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving CUP 99-25, accepting the subject agreement and securities, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 4, and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: CUP 99-25, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard between Milliken and Elm Avenues, in the Terra Vista Planned Community Plan, was approved by the Planning Commission on January 12, 2000. This project is for the construction of a 10,088 square foot retail building and a 3,1000 square foot restaurant with a drive-thru. The Developer, Western Land Properties, is submitting an agreement and securities to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond $53,200.00 Labor and Material Bond: $26,600.00 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CUP 99-25 October 4, 2000 Page 2 A letter of approval has been received from the Cucamonga County Water District. The Consent and Waiver to Annexation form signed by the Developer is on file in the City Clerk's office. Res e~l~rni~,,_, ~J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:WV:sc Attachments ! RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNGIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR CUP 99-25 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement executed on October4, 2000, Western Land Properties, as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard between Milliken and Elm Avenues; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said real property referred to as CUP 99-25; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Securities. which-are identified in said Improvement Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows: 1. That said Improvement Agreement be and the same is approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and 2 That said Improvement Securities are accepted as good and sufficient, subject to approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4 FOR CUP 99-25 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 4, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 (referred to collectively as the "Maintenance Districts"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance Districts; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation resolutions, an assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the 1972 Act related to the annexation of territory to the Maintenance District, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the Maintenance Districts on the territory proposed to be annexed to such districts; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory") be annexed to the Maintenance Districts in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act RESOLUTION NO. CUP 99-25 October 4, 2000 Page 2 to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance D!stricts; and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act and/or Article XIIID applicable to the authorization to the levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization of levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto. NOW. THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvement. c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit B. SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the Maintenance Districts. including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. Exhibit C (continued) STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 (TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $28.96 for the fiscal year 2000/01. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community): # of Rate Per Physical # of Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment 1 .and I l~e I lnit Type I lnit~ I lnits Factor l lnit~ I Jnit Revenue Single Parcel 2,499.00 .05 1,249.50 $28.96 $36,186.00 Family Multi- Unit 1,786.00 1.00 1,786.00 $28.96 $51,723.00 · Family Commercial Acre 199.45 2.00 398.90 $28.96 $11,552.00 Total $99,461.00 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (CUP 99-25) is: 13,5 Acres (Commercial) x 2.00 A.U. Factor x :$28.96 Rate Per A.U. = $781.92 Annual Assessment ORIGINAL Exhibit A To Consent And Waiver to Annexation Of Certain Real Property To Street Light Maintenance District No.1 And Approval Of the Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property The Owner of the Property !s: Western Land Properties and LDC Cougar, LLC (Print or ~ the name of the Owner of the Property in the spoce provided above.) The legal description of the Property is: (Type or print the legal description of the Property in the space provided above. Alternatively, a copy of the legal des~ilp~ion may be attached to this Exlu~it A.) Parcel 'B' of CertiFicate of Compliance No.401 for lot line adjustment, In the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, recorded as Document No.19970125996 in the office of the County Recorder of Said County. A-1 EXHIBIT "A" ,~ ~1} ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 4 d'TAEET T/~F6'3~'~ ~',4. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NORTr~,~ COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA ~ Exhibit B To Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 200012001 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO, 4 (TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY): Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 (LMD ~) represents landscape sites throughout the Terra Vista Planned Community. These sites are considered to e associated with areas within that district and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels within that district. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those parcels within that district. The various sites in Terra Vista that are maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, street trees, paseos and parks. The 36.23 acres of park consist of Coyote Canyon Park, Milliken Park, West Greenway Park, Spruce Park and La Mission Park. STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I (ARTERIAL STREETS): Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (SLD #1) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights' and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. The facilities within this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the City as a whole on an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance and/or installation of the facilities is assigned to the City-wide district. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on artedal streets and traffic signals on arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City. STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 (TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY): Street Light Maintenance District No. 4 (SLD #4) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located within the Terra Vista Planned Community. Generally th is area encompasses the residential area of the City east of Haven Avenue, south of Base Line Road, north of Foothill Boulevard and west of Rochester Avenue. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets within the Terra Vista Planned Community. .-t ,Y7 Exhibit B (continued) Proposed additions to Work Program (Fiscal Year 200112002) For Project: CUP 99-25 Number of Lamps Street Lights 5800L 9500L 16,000L 22,000L 27,500L SLD #1 3' SLD #4 6' Community Trail Tuff Non-Tuff Trees Landscaping DGSF SF SF EA L3B 23 *Existing items installed with original project Assessment Units by District Parcel Acres S1 S4 L1 Commercial '~3.50 2.0 2.0 1.0 Annexation Date: October 4, 2000 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 200012001 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 (TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY): The rate per assessment unit (A,U,) will not be increased in fiscal year 2000/01. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community): # of Physical Assessment # of Rate Per Units Units Factor Assessment Assessment Land Use Type Units Unit Revenue Single Family Parcel 1788 1.0 1788 $252.50 $ 451,470.00 Multi-Family Unit 2499 1.0 2499 $222.00 $ 554,778.00 Commercial Acre 199.45 1.0 199.45 $382.99 $ 76,387.36 TOTAL $1,082,635.36 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (CUP 99-25) is: 13.5 Acres (Commercial) x 1 A.U. Factor x $382.99 Rate PerA.U. = $5,170.37 Annual Assessment STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS): The rate per assessment unit (A.U,) is $17.77 for the fiscal year 2000/01. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets): # of Rate Per Physical # of Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment l,andUSe IJnitType IJnits IInit~Factor Ilnit~ IJnit Revenue Single Parcel 16,956.00 1.00 16,956.00 $17.77 $301,310.00 Family Multi- Unit 6,257.00 1.00 6,257.00 $17.77 $111,190.00 Family Commercial Acre 1,999.52 2.00 3,999.04 $17.77 $71,060.00 Total $483,560.00 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (CUP 99-25) is: 13.5 Acres (commercial) x 2 A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per A.U. = $479.79 Annual Assessment THE CITY OF I~ANCnO CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE: October 4, 2000 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager ZTo:,"' ' BY: , er SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRIGT NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRIGT NOS. I AND 2 AND SUMMARILY VACATE AN EXCESS STREET EASEMENT FOR TRACT MAP NO. 15963 LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LONDON AVENUE AND LIBERTY STREET, SUBMITTED BY ', CRESTWOOD GORPORATION RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Tract Map 15963, accepting the subject agreement and security, ordering the maintenance annexations and summarily vacate the excess easement and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Tract Map 15963. located on the northwest corner of London Avenue and Liberty Street was approved by the Planning Commission on February 9, 2000 for the development of 13 single family lots. In addition, the vacation of an excess street easement was approved by the Planning Commission through minute action on September 27, 2000 and is being forwarded to the City Council for final approval. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TRACT 15963 - CRES'I'VVOOD CORPORATION October 4, 2000 Page 2 The Developer, Crestwood Corporation, a California Corporation, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond $320,000.00 Labor and Material Bond: $160,000.00 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office Respectfully submitted, ~'~mj.O,Nei~l~ City Engineer WJO:dlw Attachments RESOLUTION NO. O t5 - / q 7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP NUMBER 15963, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 15963, submitted by Crestwood Corporation, a California Corporation, and consisting of 13 single family lots located at the northwest comer of London Avenue and Liberty Street was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on February 9, 2000 and is in compliance with the State Subdivision Map Act and Local Ordinance No. 28 adopted pursuant to that Act; and WHEREAS, Tract Map No. 15963 is the fmal map of the division of land approved as shown on said Tentative Tract Map; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the fmal map by the City Council of said City have now been met by entry into an Improvement Agreement guaranteed by acceptable Improvement Security by Crestwood Corporation, a California Corporation, as developer; and WHEREAS, said Developer submits for approval said Tract Map offering for dedication, for street, highway and related purposes, the streets delineated thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Security submitted by said developer be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Maintenance and Improvement Agreements on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest; and that the offers for dedication and the final map delineating the same for said Tract Map No. 15963 is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. RESOLUTION NO. O O '/tq ~. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR TRACT NO. 15963 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 1, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 (referred to collectively as the "Maintenance Districts"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance Districts; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation resolutions, an assessment engineer' s report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent ofail of the owners of property within the territory to be annexed; and : ~VHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the 1972 Act related to the annexation of territory to the Maintenance District, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the Maintenance Districts on the territory proposed to be annexed to such districts; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory") be annexed to the Maintenance Districts in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms enti~ed "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts; and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act and/or Article XIIID applicable to the authorization to the levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization of levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. TRACT NO. 15963 October 4, 2000 Page 2 VV~rlEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby fmds and determines that: a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvement. c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit B. SECTION4: All future proceedings oftheMalntenanceDistricts, including the levyofall assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property To Be Annexed The Owner of the Property is: Crestwood Corporation, a California Corporation The legal description of the Property is: Tract Map No. 15963 - A subdivision of a portion of lot 52 of Foothill Frostless Fruit Company's Tract No. 2 as shown on map recorded in Book 20, Page 34, Records of San Bemardino County, State of California The above described parcels are shown on sheet A-2 attached herewith and by this reference made a part hereof. Exhibit B To Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2000/2001 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (GENERAL CITY): Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (LMD # 1 ) represents 33.93 acres of landscape area and 43.25 acres of parks which are located at various sites throughout the City. These sites are not considered to be associated with any one particular area within the City, but rather benefit the entire City on a broader scale. As such, the parcels within this district do not represent a distinct district area as do the City's remaining LMD's. Typically parcels within this district have been annexed upon development. The various sites maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, paseos, street trees, entry monuments, Community Trails and Parks. The 43.25 acres of parks consist of Bear Gulch Park which is 5 acres, 20 acres of East and West Beryl Park, 5 acres of Old Town Park, 6.5 acres of Church Street Park, the Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center which consists of 175 acres and the newest park, Golden Oaks Park located on 6m Street, west of Archibaid. STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS): Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (SLD # 1 ) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arteriai streets throughout the City. The facilities within this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the City as a whole on an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance and/or installation of the facilities is assigned to the City-wide district. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City. STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 (LOCAL STREETS): Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 (SLD #2) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on local streets throughout the City but excluding those areas already in a local maintenance district. Generally this area encompasses the residential area of the City west of Haven Avenue. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets generally west of Haven Avenue. Proposed additions to Work Program (Fiscal Year 2001/2002) For Project: Tract 15963 B-1 V7 EXHIBIT B: Continued Number of Lamps Street Lights 5800L 9500L 16,000L 22,000L 27,500L SLD # 1 --- 2 ......... SLD # 2 8 ............ Community Trail Turf Non-Turf Trees Landscaping DGSF SF SF EA LMD #1 ...... 2,300 31 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2000/2001 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 ( GENERAL CITY): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $92.21 for the fiscal year 2000/01. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (General City): # of Assessment # of Rate Per Physical Units Assessment Assessment Land Use Type Units Factor Units Unit Revenue Single Parcel 7269 1.0 7269 $92.21 $670.274.49 Family Multi- Unit 5952 0.5 2976 $92.21 $274,416.96 Family TOTAL $944,691.45 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property is: 13 dwelling units x 1.0 Factor x $92.21 Rate Per A.U. = $1,198.73 Annual Assessment STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $17.77 for the fiscal year 2000/01. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets): # of Rate Per Physical # of Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment I,and llse Unit Type lInitq Units Factor Units Unit Revenue Single Parcel 16,956.00 1.00 16,956.00 $17.77 $301,310.00 Family Multi- Unit 6,257.00 1.00 6,257.00 $17.77 $111,190.00 Family Commercial Acre 1,999.52 2.00 3,999.04 $17.77 $71,060.00 Total $483,560.00 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property is: 13 Parcels x 1.00' A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per A.U.-- $3,003.13 Annual Assessment EXHBIT C: (Continued) STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 (LOCAL STREETS) The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $39.97 for the fiscal year 2000/01. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 (Local Streets): # of Rate Per Physical # of Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment I.and Use Unit Type tinits Units Factor IJnit~ IJnit Revenue Single Parcel 6606 1.00 6606 $39.97 $264,042.00 Family The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property is: 13 Parcels x 1.00 A.U. Factor x $39.97 Rate Per A.U. = $519.61 Annual Assessment C-2 ffD RESOLUTION NO. O ~Z) --/~ ~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ORDERING THE SUMMARILY VACATION OF EXCESS STREET EASEMENT ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LONDON AVENUE AND LIBERTY STREET, V-175 - APN 201-251-56 RELATED FILE TR15963 WHEREAS, THE City Council found by all the evidence submitted that the excess street easement per the description in attached Exhibit A is unnecessary for present or prospective public purposes. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves as follows: SECTION 1: That the City Council hereby makes its order vacating the excess street easement as described in a legal description which is attached hereto, marked Exhibit "A" and shown on Exhibit "B" and by reference made a part thereof. SECTION 2: That from and after the date the resolution is recorded, said excess street easement no longer constitutes a public easement. SECTION 3: That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution and it shall thereupon take effect and be in force. SECTION 4: That the City Clerk shall cause a certified copy of this resolution to be recorded in the office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. EXHiBiT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION LIBERTY STREET TO BE VACATED THAT PORTION OF LIBERTY STREET AS SHOWN ON TRACT 13898 RECORDED IN MAP BOOK 234 PAGES 28 THROUGH 29, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS; BEGINNINGAT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT 13898 AS SHOWN ON MAP OF SAID TRACT; THENCE SOUTH 890 55' 06" WEST, ALONG SAID NORTHERLY TRACT BOUNDARY. 161.89 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY TRACT BOUNDARY OF SAID TRACT; THENCE SOUTH 00° 35' 08" WEST ALONG SAID WESTERLY TRACT BOUNDARY, 19.47 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 790 55' 06" EAST, 23.15 FEET TO A POINT ON A 90.00 FOOT RADIUS TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHERLY; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE 11.61 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 7O 23' 28" TO A POINT ON A 270.00 FOOT RADIUS TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHERLY, TO WHICH A RADIAL LINE BEARS NORTH 2o 41' 26" WEST; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE 45.05 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 9° 33' 33" TO A POINT ON A 330.00 FOOT RADIUS TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY, TO WHICH RADIAL LINE BEARS SOUTH 7o 58' 17' WEST; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE 37.96 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 6° 35' 29" TO A POINT ON A 15.00 FOOT RADIUS TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY, TO WHICH A RADIAL LINE BEARS NORTH Io 22' 48" EAST; THENCE EASTERLY. SOUTHEASTERLY, AND SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE 23.37 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 890 15' 18", TO A POINT ON THE WEST RIGHT- OF-WAY LINE OF LONDON AVENUE (30 FEET WIDE); ~i ..., THENCE SOUTH 00° 38' 06" WEST ALONG SAID WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, 0.11 FEET TO A POINT ON A 15.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY, TO WHICH A RADIAL LINE BEARS SOUTH 88o 56'21" EAST; THENCE NORTHERLY, NORTHWESTERLY, AND WESTERLY, ALONG SAID CURVE 23.37 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 89o 15' 18". TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF LIBERTY STREET AS DEDICATED ON SAID TRACT 13898; THENCE SOUTH 890 65'06" WEST ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, 116.68 FEET TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT; THENCE NORTH 0° 35'08" EAST, 0.53 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. THIS LOT CONTAINS 403 S.F. (0.0093 AC) MORE OR LESS. ALL AS SHOVVN ON EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERB PART HEREOF. TRACT 13898 ITPOe j//,~W.~3~INrR OF TRACT ~ N2'4f~6'W AN~E RADIUS ~ TANC~NT o ~ SOU~ERLY R~ ~ ~ < UBER~ S~EET. ~ ~ AREA BEING VACA~D SEE DETAIL "A" / I 'C4J / I C4 WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LI~IE OF LONDON AVENUE AS ~ SHO~N ON ~ACT 13898 N[ CORN~ ~ ~ACT J 1~98 ~~ LONDON A~. POB SO'~'~"W ~ND 1910 ~ ~CHIB~D A~., S~. N ~GO0' ~E~LOPMENT ONT~IO. CA 91761 (909) 9~-1466 ~ES/GN FAX (909) 930-1468 SCALE: 1 "= 20' CORPORA T/ON PL~NING · RA CHO CUCAMONGA Et~GII~EERZl~G DEi~,~RTME~T O~ober 4, 2000 TO: Mayor and Membem of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager ~M: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Hen~ Mumkoshi, Associate Engineer SU~: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURI~ AND ORDERING THE ANNE~TION TO ~NDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR DR 00-06, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF ARROW ROUTE, ~ST OF I- 15 FREEWAY, SUBMI~ED BY CABOT INDUSTRIAL PROPERTIES, L.P. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security, and ordering the annexation 'to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. I and 6 and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS DR 00-06, located on the north side of Arrow Route, east of I- 15 Freeway, was approved by the planning Commission on June 14, 2000, for a development of two industrial buildings, totaling 316,092 square feet on 17.73 acres of land in the General Industrial District. The Developer, Cabot Industrial Properties, L.P., is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond $277,000.00 Labor and Matedal Bond $138,500.00 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. Letters of approval have been received from Cucamonga County Water District. The Consent and Waiver to Annexation form signed by the Developer is on file in the City Clerk's office. Respectfully submitted, City Engineer WJO:HM:drw Attachments VICINITY MAP vicinity map FOOTHILL BLVD. PROPOSED ~ SITE '~ ARROW ROUTE TRUE NORTH ~j ~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO '4 __ ~ ~_,~'~,~ · STATE OF CALIFORNIA RESOLUTION NO. D b - 2. ~D A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DR 00-06 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement executed by Cabot Industrial Properties, L.P. as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the north side of Arrow Route, east of I - 15 Freeway; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said real property referred to as DR 00-06; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES that said Improvement Agreement be and the same is approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto. RESOLUTION NO. (:~ -,2- O/ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS, 1 AND 6 FOR DR 00-06 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 (hereinafter referred to as the "Maintenance District"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council is desirous to take proceedings to annex the property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this referenced to the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, all of the owners of property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the Maintenance District have filed with the City Clerk their written consent: to the proposed annexation without notice and hearing or filing of an Engineer's "Report"! NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That this legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the property as shown in Exhibit "A" and the work program areas as described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto to the Maintenance District. SECTION 3: That all future proceedings of the Maintenance District, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the territory annexed hereunder. Exhibit A To Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Landscape Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property The Owner of the Property is: Cabot Industrial Properties, L.P. The legal description of the Property is: PARCEL "A" AFTER LOT LINE ADJUSTNIENT: THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN IS SITUATED IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: PORTIONS OF PARCELl AND PARCEL 5 OF CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE NO. 443 FOR LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT RECORDED MAY 13, 1999 AS INSTRUMENT NO.. 1999-0206054, · ' OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 1 AS SHOWN ON SAID CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE NO. 443, SAID CORNER ALSO BEING ON THE CENTERLINE OF ARROW ROUTE HIGHWAY; THENCE PERPENDICULAR TO SAID CENTERLINE NORTH 00o12'42" EAST 30.00 FEET TO A POINT ON A LINE THAT IS PARALLEL WITH AND 30.00 FEET MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES TO SAID CENTERLINE OF ARROW ROUTE HIGHWAY, SAID LINE ALSO BElNG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE LAND CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR FREEWAY PURPOSES BY DEED RECORDED JUNE 30, 1972, IN BOOK 7967, PAGE 585, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS; THENCE ALONG SAID PARALLEL AND SOUTHERLY LINE SOUTH 89°55'58'' EAST 500.75 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID LAND CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, SAID SOUTHEASTERLY LINE ALSO BEING ON A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHEAST AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 8000.00 FEET, A RADIAL BEARING TO SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 55°45'38'' WEST; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 08048'55'' AN ARC DISTANCE OF 1230.85 FEET TO THE MOST NORTHERLY CORNER OF PARCEL 5 OF SAID CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE NO. 443, A RADIAL BEARING TO SAID CORNER BEARS NORTH 43034'33" WEST; THENCE SOUTH 00°11'22'' WEST ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 5 A DISTANCE OF 320.67 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT IN SAID EASTERLY LINE; THENCE SOUTH 04°01'19" EAST ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE 353.59 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 40°02'11" WEST 710.16 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°04'02'' WEST 108.15 FEET TO THE CENTERLINE OF ARROW ROUTE HIGHWAY; THENCE ALONG SAID CENTERLINE NORTH 89055'58" WEST 1166.69 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. Exhibit A (Continued) PARCEL "B" AFTER LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT: THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN IS SITUATED INT HE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: POP, TIONS OF PARCEL I AND PARCEL 5 OF CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE NO. 443 FOR LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT RECORDED MAY 13, 1999 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 1999-0206054, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 5 AS SHOWN ON SAID CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE NO. 443, SAID CORNER ALSO BEING ON THE CENTERLINE OF ARROW ROUTE HIGHWAY; THENCE ALONG SAID CENTERLINE NORTH 89°55'58" WEST 502.83 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00°04'02'' EAST 108.15 FEET; THENCE NORTH 40°01'19" EAST ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE 654.07 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. I'NO0' 12'4-2"E ' R.B. ENGINEERING ' .~ ~ 5198 N. ASHWOOD STREET ORANGE CA ,92865 /:..'~.~ - /cb~' 'q '~V. NEAd TERRY LS :4*73~')/SATE · LOT LINE TO BE REMOVED ~- ..... NEW LOT LINE \ ' z~, ~_'~..~. .................... i ~ !"""%:, .~. , 1007.66' ,,,,~, I COR. PCL. 5- CERT, ELY. LINE OF PCL. 5- CERT. ,"~'~ [ OF COMPLIANCE NO. 443 OF COMPLIANCE NO. 44-3 I INSTR. NO. 19990206054 INSTR, NO. 19990206054 A-3 EXHIBIT "B" WORK PROGRAM PROJECT: DR 00-06 STREET LIGHTS: NUMBER OF LAMPS Dist. 5800L 9500L 16,000L 22,000L 27,500L S1 S6 8 LANDSCAPING: Community Equestrian Trail Turf Non-Tuff Trees Dist. D.G.S.F. S.F. S.F. Ea. L3B 2 ASSESSMENT UNITS: Assessment Units By District Parcel Acres S1 S6 L3B 17.73 18 18 Annexation Date: May 17, 2000 Form Date 11/16/94 CERTIFICATE OF SUFFICIENCY OF CONSENT AND WAIVER TO ANNEXATION FOR DR 00-06 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B, STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA WILLIAM J. O'NEIL, the undersigned, hereby certifies as follows: That I am the duly CITY ENGINEER of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. That on the 4t~ day of October, 2000, I reviewed a Consent and Waiver to Annexation pertaining to the annexation of certain property to the Maintenance District, a copy of which is on file in the Office of the City Clerk. That I caused said Consent and Waiver to Annexation to be examined and my examination revealed that said Consent and Waiver to. Annexation has been signed by the owners of all of the property within the territory !proposed to be annexed to the Maintenance District. That said Consent and Waiver to Annexation meets the requirements of Section 22608.1 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. EXECUTED this 4t" day of October 2000, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. CITY ENGINEER CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA RAN HO CUCAMON GA ENGINEEI~ING DIVI61ON StaffR rt DATE: October 4, 2000 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Joe Stofa, Jr. Associate Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF MAP AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4 FOR PARCEL MAP NO. 15476 LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF HAVEN AVENUE AND TOWN CENTER DRIVE, SUBMITTED BY WESTERN LAND PROPERTIES RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution approving Parcel Map 15476, and ordering the maintenance annexations and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Parcel Map 15476, located at the southeast corner of Haven Avenue and Town Center Drive was approved by the Planning Commission on May 10, 2000 for the purpose of subdividing into 4 parcels. The Developer, Western Land Properties, a California Limited Partnership, has previously submitted an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off- site improvements with the approval of CUP 99-26. Respectfully submitted, - William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:JS:dlw Attachments SOLU,ION NO. O 0" A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROV1NG PARCEL MAP NUMBER 15476 WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map No. 15476, submitted by Western Land Properties, and consisting of 4 parcels located on the southeast comer of Haven Avenue and Town Center Drive, being a division of 9.7 acres, was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on May 10, 2000, and is in compliance with the State Subdivision Map Act and Local Ordinance No. 28 adopted pursuant to that Act; and WHEREAS, Parcel Map No. 15476 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown on said Tentative Parcel Map; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met by entry into three (3) previous Improvement Agreements guaranteed by acceptable Improvement Securities by Western Land Properties as developer; and WHEREAS, said Developer submits for approval said Parcel Map offering for dedication, for street, highway and related purposes, the streets delineated thereon and the easements dedicated thereon for storm drain, drainage overflow, sidewalk, street tree and incidental purposes.. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES, that the offers for dedication, easements and the final map delineating the same for said Parcel Map No. 15476 is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. RESOLUTIO 0 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4 FOR PARCEL MAP 15476 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City ofRancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 4, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 (referred to collectively as the "Maintenance Districts"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance Districts; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation resolutions, an assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the tenitory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisiohs of the 1972 Act related to the annexation of territory to the Maintenance District, Article XIIID of~the~Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the Maintenance Districts on the territory proposed to be annexed to such districts; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory") be annexed to the Maintenance Districts in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts; and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act and/or Article XIIID applicable to the authorization to the levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization of levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. PARCEL MAP 15476 October 4, 2000 Page 2 WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory fxom the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvement. c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the Territory to th~ Maintenance Districts, approves the financing of.the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit B. SECTION4: All future proceedings oftheMaintenanceDislricts, including the levyofall assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property To Be Annexed The Owner of the Property is: Western Land Properties, a California Limited Partnership The legal description of the Property is: Tentative Parcel Map in the City ofRancho Cucamonga, California, being a subdivision of Parcel B per Certificate of Compliance for Lot Line Adjustment No. 351, recorded August 9, 1991, as Inst. No. 91-303291, in official records of said county. The above described parcels are shown on sheet A-2 attached herewith and by this reference made a part hereof. Exhibit B To Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2000/2001 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2000/2001 LANDSCAPE MAINENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 (TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY) Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 (LMD #4) represents landscape sites throughout the Tenca Vista Planned Community. These sites are considered to e associated with areas within that district and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels within that district. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those parcels within that district. The various sites in Tenca Vista that are maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, street trees, paseos and parks. The 36.23 acres of park consist of Coyote Canyon Park, Milliken Park, West Greenway Park, Spruce Park and La Mission Park. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS): Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (SLD # 1 ) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. The facilities within this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the City as a whole on an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance and/or installation of the facilities is assigned to the City-wide district. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City. STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 (TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY) Street Light Maintenance District No. 4 (SLD #4) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located within the Tetra Vista Planned Community. Generally this area encompasses the residential area of the City east of Haven Avenue, south of Base Line Road, north of Foothill Boulevard and west of Rochester Avenue. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties wifi~in this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets within the Terra Vista Planned Community. B -I Proposed additions to Work Program (Fiscal Year 2001/2002) For Project: Parcel Map 15476 Number of Lamps Street Lights 5800L 9500L 16,000L 22,000L 27,500L SLD # 1 ............ SLD # 4 ......... 1 --- Community Trail Turf Non-Turf Hardscape Trees Landscaping DGSF SF SF SF EA LMD #4 ............... Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2000/2001 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 (TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY): # of Assessment # of Rate Per Physical Units Assessment Assessment Land Use Type Units Factor Units Unit Revenue Single Parcel 1788 1.0 1788 $252.50 $ 451,470.00 Family Multi- Unit 2499 1.0 2499 $222.00 $ 554,778.00 Family Commercial Acre 199.45 1.0 199.45 $382.99 $ 76,387.36 TOTAL $1,082,635.36 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (PM 15476) is: Parcel 1: 1.854 Acre x 2 A.U. Factor x $382.99 Rate Per A.U. = $ 701.06 Annual Assessment Parcel 2: 0.515 Acre x 2 A.U. Factor x $382.99 Rate Per A.U. = $ 197.24 Annual Assessment Parcel 3: 0.521 Acre x 2 A.U. Factor x $382.99 Rate Per A.U.'= $ 199.54 Annual Assessment Parcel 4: 6.747 Acre x 2 A.U. Factor x $382.99 Rate Per A.U. = $2,584.03 Annual Assessment STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $17.77 for the fiscal year 2000/01. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets): # of Rate Per Physical # of Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment l,and lJ~e l/nit Type Units Units Factor Units 'Unit Revenue Single Parcel 16,956.00 1.00 16,956.00 $17.77 $301,310.00 Family Multi- Unit 6,257.00 1.00 6,257.00 $17.77 $111,190.00 Family Commercial Acre 1,999.52 2.00 3,999.04 $17.77 $71,060.00 Total $483,560.00 C-1 7~ Exhibit C: Continued The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (PM 15476) is: Parcel 1: 1.854Acre x 2A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per A.U. = $ 66.89AnnualAssessment Parcel2: 0.515Acre x 2A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per A.U.= $ 18.30Annual Assessment Parcel 3: 0.521 Acre x 2A.U. Factor x $17.77RatePerA.U.= $ 18.52AnnualAssessment Parcel 4: 6.747 Acre x 2 A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per A.U. = $239.79 Annual Assessment STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 (TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY): # of Rate Per Physical # of Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment l.and Use llnit Type Units Ilnits Factor Units Unit Revenue Single Parcel 2,499.00 .05 1,249.50 $28.96 $36,186.00 Family Multi- Parcel 1,786.00 1.00 1,786.00 $28.96 $51,723.00 Family Commemial Acre 199.45 2.00 398.90 $28.96 $11,552.00 Total $99,461.00 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Properly (PM 15476) is: Parcel 1: 1.854Acre x 2A.U. Factor x $28.96RatePerA.U.= $107.38 Annual Assessment Parcel2: 0.515Acre x 2A.U. Factor x $28.96RatePerA.U.= $ 29.83AnnualAssessment Parcel3: 0.521 Acre x 2A.U. Factor x $28.96 Rate Per A.U. = $ 30.18Annual Assessment Parcel4: 6.747Acre x 2A.U. Factor x $28.96RatePerA.U.= $390.79 Annual Assessment RA CHO CUCAMONGA E~GINEERING DEPARTMENT S Repor DATE: October 4, 2000 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Willie Valbuena, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT; APPROVAL OF MAP AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT FOR PARCEL MAP NO. 15424, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BETVVEEN MILLIKEN AND ELM AVENUES, SUBMITTED BY WESTERN LAND PROPERTIES RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Parcel Map 15424 and monumentation cash deposit, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard between Milliken and Elm Avenues, and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to cause said map to record. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: Tentative Parcel Map 15424, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard between Milliken and Elm Avenues, in the Terra Vista Planned Community Plan, was conditionally approved by the Planning Commission on January 12, 2000. The tentative map was approved for a subdivision of 4.0 acres of land into five parcels. The Developer, Western Land Properties, is submitting a monumentation cash deposit to guarantee the setting of the monuments in the following amounts: Monumentation Cash Deposit $2,650.00 The copy of the Consent and Waiver to Annexation form signed by the Developer is available in the City Clerk's office. ~O'Nei~ City Engineer WJO:WV:sc Attachments N C~TY OF rrm~: PAA'(fl__N~P~!i RANCHO CUCAMONGA Trm,m_. P'/(/N/FF' NAP ENG~G DIVISION EXI4mlT: 73 RESOLUTION NO. ~)-..Z.~)/-/' A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 15424 AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 15424, submitted by Western Land Properties, and consisting of a subdivision of 4.0 acres of land into five parcels, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard between Milliken and Elm Avenues in the Terra Vista Community Plan, was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on January 12, 2000; and WHEREAS, Parcel Map Number 15424 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown on said Tentative Parcel Map; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met by posting the Monumentation Cash Deposit by Western Land Properties, as developer. NOW, THEREFORE. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES that said Monumentation Cash Deposit submitted by said developer be and the same is hereby approved, and that said Parcel Map Number 15424 be and the same is hereby approved, and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. THE CITY OF I~ANCHO CUCA~IONGA S ffRepor DATE: October 4, 2000 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Willie Valbuena, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF PARCEL MAP NOS. 15453, 15454 AND 15455, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF MILLIKEN AVENUE BETWEEN BASE LINE ROAD AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, SUBMI'H'ED BY LEWIS OPERATING CORPORATION RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving Parcel Map Nos. 15453, 15454 and 15455, and authorizing the City Clerk to cause said maps to record. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: Tentative Parcel Map Nos. 15453, 15454 and 15455, located on the east side of Milliken Avenue between Base Line Road and Foothill Boulevard in the Terra Vista Community Plan, were approved by the Planning Commission on April 12, 2000, for the division of 54.7, 93.2 and 34.8 acres of land into 3, 4 and 3 parcels respectively. The approval of the parcel maps is intended for financing and conveyance purposes only. Conditions of approval shall be placed upon development of each parcel map. Respectively submitted, illi~j.O-l~eil~'~ W N City Engineer WJO:WV:sd Attachment 75 Y,~,~ C~TYOF rr~: V/C/~/r~ N RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION RESOLUTION NO. ~)-.Z t9..~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCliO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NOS. 15453, 15454 AND 15455 WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Nos. 15453, 15454 and 15455, submitted by Lewis Operating Corporation, located on the east side of Milliken Avenue between Base Line Road and Foothill Boulevard being a division of 54.7, 93.2 and 34.8 acres of land into 3, 4 and 3 pamels respectively, were approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on April 12, 2000, are in compliance with the State Subdivision Map Act and Local Ordinance No. 28, adopted pursuant to that Act; and WHEREAS, Parcel Map Nos. 15453, 15454 and 15455 are the final maps of the division of lands approved as shown on said Tentative Parcel Maps; and WHEREAS, all the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final maps by the City Council of said City have now been met. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES that said Parcel Map Nos. 15453, 15454 and 15455 are hereby approved and that the offers for dedication and the final maps delineating the same for said Parcel Map Nos. 15453, 15454 and 15455 are hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. 61TE I m u.I "1- 0 r,- N CITY OF rrF~:~~t~~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA TI~.~: II 'I~NG]:i'~.~G ]:)IV]~O~ ~': ~ ' 7~' -\ 61r~' uJ h- W -- 0 CITY OF ITEM: RANCHO CUCAMONGA TrrL~,~ ENGI]q'E,k'~ING DIVISION EXI-WRIT:_~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TrrLE: RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENCINEEI~INC DEPAI~TMENT StaffRepor DATE: October 4, 2000 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP ,City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Maria E. Perez, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF DRAINAGE ACCEPTANCE AGREEMENT FOR TRACT 15948, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF BASE LINE ROAD WEST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY WL HOMES LLC, DBA JOHN LAING HOMES RECOMMENDATION: :' It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution approving a drainage~ agreement between the City, Cucamonga 220, LP. and WL Homes LLC to provide for runoff from Tract 15948 and authorize the Mayor to sign and direct the City Clerk attest and cause to be recorded. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On July 19, 2000, City Council approved the Tract Map, Improvement Agreement, Security and annexation to street light and landscape districts. The Drainage Agreement to provide for public waters draining off the improved tract is ready for City Council approval. Copies of the agreement are available in the City Clerk's Office. Respectfully Submitted, Wilm~J.O~ City Engineer WJO:MEP:sd Attachments BASE LINE ROAD · · iTEM: TT15948 CITY OF tiTLE: ViClNIW MAP BANCHO CUCAMONGA EXamIT: ENGINEERING DIVISIGN RESOLUTION NO. ~) ~)-.2.~)/~, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DRAINAGE ACCEPTANCE AGREEMENT FOR TRACT 15948, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF BASE LINE ROAD WEST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE, SUBMll'I'ED BY WL HOMES LLC, DBA JOHN LAING HOMES AND MAKING FINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF A. Recitals. 1. The developer of Tract 15948, WL Homes LLC, DBA John Laing Homes in conformance with the conditions of approval the Final Map, provided for the execution of an off-site drainage agreement. 2. On the 19th day of July, 2000, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga approved the Final Map, improvement agreement, improvement security and ordered the annexation to street lighting and landscape districts. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOES HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: 1. The Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Said Drainage Agreement submitted by said developer be and the same is hereby approved, and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Drainage Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest; and the City Clerk is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. THE CITY OF [~ANCItO CUCAMONCA Staff Report DATE: October 4, 2000 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Willie Valbuena, Assistant Civil Engineer SUBJECT: RELEASE OF A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FOR PARCELS 1 AND 2 OF PARCEL MAP 9349, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF STRANG LANE, EAST OF CARNELIAN STREET, SUBMI'I'FED BY DANNY W. PAULSON AND EARLINE R. PAULSON RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution releasing the Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement, and authorizing the Mayor to sign said release and the City Clerk to record same. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: A Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement was approved by the City Council on April 22, 1982, and recorded on May 7, 1982, as Document No. 82-090509 in the office of the County Recorder, San Bernardino County, California. The agreement was for the future construction of the missing public improvements fronting Parcels 1 and 2 of Parcel Map 9349, located on the south side of Strang Lane, east of Carnelian Street and is no longer needed due to designation of Strang Lane as a private street. Also, the said agreement was originally signed by Bdan Samuel Smith and was later automatically transferred to the present owners. William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:WV:sc Attachment Kin Ran~ Caballero Drive ~Almond .lla Vista Senda R~ad Rd. Vicara Vicara Strano St. EE SL = = CameiHa Oahler 0r. /_ ~ \ " Hillside Road Orchard , Rancho > St. B~ch~ Dr. Wllf Th~ Ave, Or, ~bred m ~. IIt~ treet ~ Dr. : Golde~ Golden }wer Ave. 'um~lo. St. ~ Qua~erhorse o _ 4andarin ..,_ CITY OF rr~: STA'I!N~ LIIN~jq RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITT,~.: WcINIrY' NIIP gNGINg. k':RI:NG DIVISIONKXFTmlT: RESOLUTION NO. ~Z:)- Z Z) 7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RELEASING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM DANNY W. PAULSON AND EARLINE R. PAULSON WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted a Resolution on April 21, 1982, accepting a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement from Brian Samuel Smith; and WHEREAS, said Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement was recorded in Official Records of San Bernardino County, California, on May 7, 1982, as Document No. 82-090509; and WHEREAS, said Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement is no longer required. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby release said Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement from Parcels 1 and 2 of Parcel Map 9349, authorizes the Mayor to sign same and directs the City Clerk to record same in the office ofthe:County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. RANCHO C UCAMON GA ENC~INEERIN(} DEPARTMENT DATE: October 4, 2000 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Willie Valbuena, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF A REQUEST TO SUMMARILY VACATE AN EXCESS STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF INDUSTRIAL LANE SOUTH OF FERON BOULEVARD, V-174, APN 209-032-39 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends City Council adopt the attached resolution ordering the summary vacation of excess street right-of-way located on the west side of Industrial Lane, south of Feron Boulevard and directing the City Clerk to present same to the County Recorder for recordation. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: Goodyear Rubber Company is currently processing CUP 97-33 for the construction of an 18,844 square foot metal building. In conjunction with this processing, Goodyear has requested the vacation of an excess street right-of-way that is contiguous to the property. The said access right-of-way is a portion of a future cul-de-sac, located on the west side of Industrial Lane, south of Feron Boulevard and was dedicated to the City for Future use on March 14, 1978. However, on September 17, 1980, Parcel Map 4511 was recorded dedicating various streets in the vicinity and extending Industrial Lane southerly. As a result, the dedicated portion of the cul-de-sac is not usable anymore. On September 27, 2000, the Planning Commission determined that the said excess right-of-way would conform to the General Plan and recommended that the vacation occur. William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:WV:sc Attachments N C~TY 0F rr~: V- 12'4 RANCHO CUCAMONGA Tr~.~-. VICINITY PIAP ENGINEERING DIVISION ~I~. RESOLUTION NO. OO- Z~)~' A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY ORDERING THE VACATION OF EXCESS STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF INDUSTRIAL LANE SOUTH OF FERON BOULEVARD WHEREAS, by Chapter 4, Article 1, Section 8331, of the Streets and Highways Code, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is authorized to summarily vacate the excess street right-of-way located on the west wide of industrial Lane, south of Feron Boulevard; and WHEREAS, the City Council found by all the evidence submitted that the excess right-of-way is unnecessary for present or prospective public street purposes, it has not been used for more than five (5) consecutive years and no public money was expended for maintenance of same; and NOW, THEREFORE, the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves as follows: SECTION 1: That the City Council hereby makes its order vacating the excess right- of-way located on the west side of Industrial Lane, south of Feron Boulevard, as described in Exhibit "A" and shown on Exhibit "B'. SECTION 2: That from and after the date the resolution is recorded, said excess right-of-way no longer constitute a street or public utility easement. SECTION 3: That the subject vacation shall be subject to the reservations and exceptions, if any, for existing utilities on record. SECTION 4: That the City Clerk shall cause a certified copy of this resolution to be recorded in the office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. SECTION 5: That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution, and it shall thereupon take effect and be in force. EXHIBIT DEED FOR EASEMENT VACATION Request for vacation of a portion of an easement for street, highway and related purposes in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as Parcel 1 of said easement recorded in Book 9~88, Page 1643, of Official Records of said County, lying within the following described property: A portion of the south half of the southeast quarter of Section 10, Township I South, Range 7 West, San Bernardino Base and Meridian, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as follows: BEGINNING at the southwest corner of said southeast quarter; thence 1495.80 feet south 89~43' 32" east; thence north 0=16, 28" east 180.00 feet; thence north 89=43, 32" west 50.00 feet; thence north 0~'16' 28" east 487.00 feet to the true point of beginning; thence south 89o43' 32" east 266.20 feet, more or less, to the west line of the land described in deed to Geo. J. Davies and wife, recorded December 10, 1929, in Book 569, Page 74, Official Records of said County; thence south 0°16, 28" west along said west line 182.00 feet, more or less, to the northeast corner of land .~ described in deed conveyed to Tony Sciacca recorded January 22, 1925, in Book 879, '.' Page 363 of Deeds ~ said County; thence north 89?43' 32" west 266.20 feet; thence . ' north 0°16, 28" east to the true point of beginning. RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEI~DINC DEPADT~II~NT Sb fRepo t DATE: October 4, 2000 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Linda R. Beek, Jr. Engineer ~-~ SUBJECT: RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND FOR CUP 99-10, SUBMITTED BY EVERGREEN DEVCO, INC., LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF CARNELIAN AND NINETEENTH STREET RECOMMENDATION: An in-lieu fee in the amount of $99,045.00 has been received to guarantee construction of the undergrounding of overhead utilities at this location, and it is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond No. SSB-296931 in the amount of $109,000.00. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: As a condition of approval of completion of CUP 99-10, located on the southeast corner of Camelian and Nineteenth Street, the applicant was required to underground overhead utility lines. The developer has paid an in-lieu fee to the City of Rancho Cucamonga in the amount of $99,045.00 and it is recommended that City Council release the existing Faithful PerFormance Bond No. SSB-296931 in the amount of $109,000.00. Developer: Evergreen Devco, Inc. 2920 East Camelback Road, Suite 100 Phoenix, AZ 84016 Release: Faithful Performance Bond No. SSB-296931 $109,000.00 ~Z.~mj~.lO,Nei~m'~ City Engineer WJO:LRB:Is ~Z City of Rancho Cucomongo i CuP qq-~o :::I-.-LI ORDINANCE NO. 636 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 00-01, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS MAP FROM UTILITY CORRIDOR TO LOW RESIDENTIAL (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF SR 30 AND ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE NORTHERLY PROLONGATION OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD APPROXIMATELY 300 FEET WIDE BY 8,000 FEET IN LENGTH, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 225-161-64, 225-101-41, 225-071-61, AND 225-082-03 A. RECITALS. 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for Etiwanda North Specific Plan Amendment No. 00-01, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development District Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On August 23, 2000, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on an associated General Plan Amendment application and issued Resolution No. 00-88, recommending to the City Council that General Plan Amendment No. 00-03A be approved. 3. On August 23, 2000, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and recommended approval of the application by the adoption of Resolution No. 00- 88. 4. On September 20, 2000, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the associated General Plan Amendment application and issued Resolution No. 00-189, approving the associated General Plan Amendment No. 00-03A. 5. On September 20, 2000, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 6. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. ORDINANCE. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find, determine, and ordain as follows: Ordinance No. 636 Page 2 of 5 SECTION 1: This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and COFFeCt. ,SECTION 2: Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing on September 20, 2000, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a) The application applies to property currently located within the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Sphere of Influence. The parcels are approximately 64 acres of land, basically a rectangular configuration approximately 300 feet in width by 8000 feet in length, located north of SR 30 on the east side of the northerly prolongation of Day Creek Boulevard, which is presently vacant. Said property is currently designated as Utility Corridor; and b) The properties to the east and west of the subject site are designated Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) and are vacant; and c) This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and d) This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and e) The County of San Bernardino Board of Supervisors previously certified an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) in 1991 and a Supplemental EIR (SEIR) on October26, 1999. The City of Rancho Cucamonga. in conjunction with this project, prepared an addendum to the SEIR. The addendure determined that no additional environmental studies were required to be prepared. Therefore, this amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have additional significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. SECTION 3: Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a) That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding Ordinance No. 636 Page 3 of 5 area as evidenced by its frontage on a public street and its size exceeding minimum size requirements for the land use designation; and b) On the basis of the facts and evidence set forth in the Initial study and Addendure prepared in conjunction with this project, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has determined that the Addendure is the adequate environmental analysis that is required as authorized by Section 21166 of CEQA and Section 15162 of the Guidelines; and c) The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan, which contains provisions for Mixed Use land use designations. SECTION 4: Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in sections 1, 2, and 3 above, this Council hereby approves Etiwanda North Specific Plan Amendment No. 00-01 to change the zoning designation from Utility Corridor to Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) as shown in Exhibit "A" of this Ordinance, SECTION 6: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 4th day of October. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: William J. Alexander, Mayor Ordinance No. 636 Page 4 of 5 A'R'EST: Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby cedify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 20th day of September 2000, and was passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 4th day of October 2000. Executed this 5th day of October 2000, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA \ ~- o b,/alKIIJll~heCityo~R3nchoCuca/Ixx~gaarep~esenledisa TH E C ITY 0 F RANClIO CUCAHONGA S Report DATE: October 4, 2000 TO:. Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, City Manager FROM: Lawrence I. Temple, Administrative Services Director SUBJECT: Approve Resolutions to Amend Contract with the California Public Employees Retirement System to Provide Section 21574, Fourth Level of 1959 Survivor Benefit. Recommendation It is recommended the City Council approve the following: (a) Resolution of Intention to amend our contract with the California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS) to provide Section 21574, Fourth Level of 1959 Survivors Benefit for miscellaneous members, (b) First reading of ordinance authorizing an amendment to the City's contract with CaIPERS to provide the aforementioned benefit, and (c) agreement to pool 1959 Survivor Benefits assets and liabilities as required by CalPERS. Back.qround Last June the City signed a three-year labor contract with the three employee bargaining groups, General Employees, Maintenance Employees, and Supervisory and Professional Employees that would provide Section 21574, Fourth Level of 1959 Survivors Benefit. The inclusion of such benefit requires an amendment to our contract with CaIPERS. As a prerequisite to amending our contract, CaIPERS require the City to adopt the resolution, ordinance, and agreement described above. Respectfully submitted, Lawrence I. Temple Administrative Services Director Fourth Level Survivors Beneffi RESOLUTION NO. 0{2} ' ] q 2. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL'OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ADOPTING A RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO APPROVE AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONTRACT BETWEEN THE BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION OF THE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM AND THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA WHEREAS, the Public Employees' Retirement Law permits the participation of public agencies and their employees in the Public Employees' Retirement System by the execution of a contract, and sets forth the procedure by which said public agencies may elect to subject themselves and their employees to amendments to said Law; and WHEREAS, one of the steps in the procedures to amend this contract is the adoption by the governing body of the public agency of a resolution giving notice of its intention to approve an amendment to said contract, which resolution shall contain a summary of the change proposed in said contract; and WHEREAS, the following is a statement of the proposed change: To provide Section 21574 (Fourth Level of 1959 Survivor Benefits) for local miscellaneous members. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the governing body of the above agency does hereby give notice of intention to approve an amendment to the contract between said public agency and the Board of Administration of the Public Employees' Retirement System, a copy of said amendment being attached hereto, as an "Exhibit" and by this reference made a part hereof. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 4th day of October, 2000. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: William J. Alexander, Mayor AGREEMENT TO POOL 1959 SURVIVOR BENEFITS ASSETS AND LIABILITIES BETWEEN THE BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM AND THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA WHEREAS, Government Code Section 21574 provides for a single employer rate to be established to provide benefits under said Section on account of members employed by contracting agencies electing to include the provision of said Section in their contracts; and WHEREAS, Government Code Section 21574, requires pooling of all assets and liabilities of all contracting agencies subject to said Section; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT AGREED, that assets and liabilities of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and its covered employees shall be pooled pursuant to the provisions of Government Code Section 21574. BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY BY KENNETH W. MARZION, CHIEF PRESIDING OFFICER ACTUARIAL & EMPLOYER SERVICES DIVISION PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM Date PERS-CON-59 (Re~, 7/96) /al City of Rancho Cucamonga -2- September 11, 2000 Disclosure of the cost of this Contract Amendment We recommend that the agency disclose the following costs due to the adoption of this plan amendment: 1) Change in the Present Value of Benefits $ 0 2) Change in the Unfunded Accrued Liability $ (2,063,499) 3) Change in the employer rate 0,000% Disclosure of the cost of this Contract Amendment for Fourth Level of 1959 Survivor Benefits We recommend that the agency disclose the following costs due to the adoption of this plan amendment: 1 ) Total Normal Cost (first year only) $ 11,904 2) Unfunded Liability Payment (annually for 5 years) $ (11,904) 3) Total First Year Cost $ 0 Government Code Section 7507 requires that the future annual costs of the proposed contract amendment be made public at a public meeting at least two weeks prior to the adoption of the final Ordinance. The agency is to certify compliance on the enclosed Certification of Compliance with Government Code Section 7507. Two copies of the Agreement to Pool 1959 Survivor Benefits Assets and Liabilities are enclosed for signature. The agreement will acknowledge that public agencies subject to Section 21574 will have all assets and liabilities pooled into a single account based on term insurance rates for local miscellaneous members. In summary, the following documents must be returned to this office before we can forward the actual contracts and other final documents necessary to complete the proposed amendment. DO NOT HOLD THESE DOCUMENTS PENDING ADOPTION QF THE FINAL ORDINANCE. ORIGINAL SIGNATURES ARE REQUIRED 1. Resolution of Intention, original or certified copy. 2. Certification of Governing Body's Action (CON-12), original. CalPERS EXHIBIT California Public Employees' Retirement System AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT Between the Board of Administration California Public Employees' Retirement System and the City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga The Board of Administration, California Public Employees' Retirement System, hereinafter referred to as Board, and the governing body of the above public agency, hereinaffer referred to as Public Agency, having entered into a contract effective January 28, 1978, and witnessed January 26, 1978, and as amended effective September 22, 1980, November 16, 1981, September 26, 1988 and April 4, 1996 which provides for participation of Public Agency in said System, Board and Public Agency hereby agree as follows: A. Paragraphs I through 11 are hereby stricken from said contract as executed effective April 5, 1996, and hereby replaced by the following paragraphs numbered I through 11 inclusive: 1. All words and terms used herein which are defined in the Public Employees' Retirement Law shall have the meaning as defined therein unless otherwise specifically provided. "Normal retirement age" shall mean age 55 for local miscellaneous members. FL?,,SE DO NOT SIGN 2. Public Agency shall participate in the Public Employees' Retirement System from and after January 28, 1978 making its employees as hereinafter provided, members of said System subject to all provisions of the Public Employees' Retirement Law except such as apply only on election of a contracting agency and are not provided for herein and to all amendments to said Law hereafter enacted except those, which by express provisions thereof, apply only on the election of a contracting agency. 3. Employees of Public Agency in the following classes shall become members of said Retirement System except such in each such class as are excluded by law or this agreement: a. Employees other than local safety members (herein referred to as local miscellaneous members). 4. In addition to the classes of employees excluded from membership by said Retirement Law, the following classes of employees shall not become members of said Retirement System: a. SAFETY EMPLOYEES. 5. The percentage of final compensation to be provided for each year of credited prior and current service as a local miscellaneous member shall be determined in accordance with Section 21354 of said Retirement Law (2% at age 55 Full). 6. Public Agency elected and elects to be subject to the following optional provisions: a. Section 20042 (One-Year Final C. ompensation). b. Section 21024 (Military Service Credit as Public Service), Statutes of 1976. c. Section 21151 (Industrial Disability Retirement For Local Miscellaneous Members). d. Section 21427 (Improved Nonindustrial Disability Allowance). e. Section 21574 (Fourth Level of 1959 Survivor Benefits). f. Section 20614, Statutes of 1978, (Reduction of Normal Member Contribution Rate). From September 22, 1980 and until November 18, 1981, the normal local miscellaneous member contribution rate shall be 0%. Legislation repealed said Section effective September 29, 1980. g. Section 20690, Statutes of 1980, (To prospectively Revoke Section 20614, Statutes of 1978). 7. Public Agency, in accordance with Government Code Section 20834, shall not be considered an "employer" for purposes of the Public Employees' Retirement Law. Contributions of the Public Agency shall be fixed and determined as provided in Government Code Section 20834, and such contributions hereafter made shall be held by the Board as provided in Government Code Section 20834. 8. Public Agency shall contribute to said Retirement System the contributions determined by actuarial valuations of prior and future service liability with respect to local miscellaneous members of said Retirement System. 9. Public Agency shall also contribute to said Retirement System as follows: a. Contributions required per covered member on account of the 1959 Survivor Benefits provided under Section 21574 of said Retirement Law. (Subject to annual change.) In addition, all assets and liabilities of Public Agency and its employees shall be pooled in a single account, based on term insurance rates, for survivors of all local miscellaneous members. b. A reasonable amount, as fixed by the Board, payable in one installment within 60 days of date of contract to cover the costs of administering said System as it affects the employees of Public Agency, not including the costs of special valuations or of the periodic investigation and valuations required by law. c. A reasonable amount, as fixed by the Board, payable in one installment as the occasions arise, to cover the costs of special valuations on account of employees of Public Agency, and costs of the periodic investigation and valuations required by law. 10. Contributions required of Public Agency and its employees shall be subject to adjustment by Board on account of amendments to the Public Employees' Retirement Law, and on account of the experience under the Retirement System as determined by the periodic investigation and valuation required by said Retirement Law. 11. Contributions required of Public Agency and its employees shall be paid by Public Agency to the Retirement System within fifteen days after the end of the period to which said contributions refer or as may be prescribed by Board regulation. If more or less than the correct amount of contributions is paid for any period, proper adjustment shall be made in connection with subsequent remittances. Adjustments on account of errors in contributions required of any employee may be made by direct payments between the employee and the Board. B. This amendment shall be effective on the __ day of ., BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION " CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT'~YSTEM CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY ":: BY KENNETH W. MARZION,,,CFIIEF PRESIDING OFFICER ACTUARIAL & EMPLOYER SERVICES DIVISION PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM .,,<(A.~ Attest: , ~,~C3. ' Clerk AMENDMENT PERS-CON-702A (Rev. 8\96) ORDINANCE NO. ~57 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION OF THE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM TO PROVIDE SECTION 21574, FOURTH LEVEL OF 1959 SURVIVORS BENEFIT FOR ALL MISCELLANEOUS MEMBERS. A. Recitals 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga, after meeting and conferring with employee representatives, entered into a three year labor contract with the General Employees, Maintenance Employees, and Supervisory and Professional Employees bargaining groups. 2. The City agreed to provide Section 21574, Fourth Level of 1959 Survivors Benefit. 3. On June 22, 2000, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 00-131 implementing salary and benefits for fiscal year 2000/2001, including Section 21574, Fourth Level of 1959 Survivors Benefit. 4. The City of Rancho Cucamonga contracts with the California Public Employees Retirement System to provide retirement benefits to its employees. 5. The California Public Employees Retirement System requires the City to amend its contract whenever it provides new benefits such as Section 21574, Fourth Level of 1959 Survivors Benefit. B. Ordinance NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby ordain as follows: SECTION 1: This Council hereby authorizes an amendment to the contract between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Board of Administration of the California Public Employees' Retirement System, a copy of said amendment being attached hereto, marked Exhibit, and by such reference made a part hereof as though herein set out in full. SECTION 2: This Council hereby authorizes, empowers, and directs the Mayor to execute said amendment for and on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 707 SECTION 3: This ordinance shall take effect 30 days after the date of its adoption and prior to the expiration of 15 days from the passage thereof shall be published at least 15 days in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation, published and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga and thenceforth and thereafter the same shall be in full force and effect. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: William J. Alexander, Mayor Ordinance Fourth Level Survivors Benefit CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM Actuarial and Employer Services Division Public Agency Contract Services P.O. Box 942709 Sacramento, CA 94229-2709 (916) 326-3420 CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 7507 I hereby certify that in accordance with Section 7507 of the Government Code the future annual costs as determined by the System Actuary and/or the increase in retirement benefit(s) have been made public at a public meeting of the of the (governing body) (public agency) on which is at least two weeks prior to the adoption of the (date) Resolution / Ordinance. Clerk/Secretary Title Date PERS-CON-12A (rev. 1/96) CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM Actuarial and Employer Services Division Public Agency Contract Services P.O. Box 942709 Sacramento, CA 94229-2709 (916) 326-3420 CERTIFICATION OF GOVERNING BODY'S ACTION I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of a Resolution adopted by the of the (governing body) (public agency) OR (date) Clerk/Secretary Title PERS-CON-12 (rev. 1/96) FIe RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE September 28, 2000 TO: May s and Members of the City Council Ja Lam, AICP FRO Brad Buller, C~ty Planner ~IDERA:ION OF APPEAL - WHITE Last night, the Planning Commission heard an appeal of Mr. White's re-roofing issue. The Planning Commission denied the appeal. Early this morning, Mr. White filed an appeal of the Planning Commission's action. His appeal includes a request to be heard by City Council next week, October 4th, because of the current or likely weather conditions. His roof remains partly completed because he stopped working on the roof when he was unable to obtain a building permit. Based on the applicant's testimony that the entire underlayment has been installed, it is staff's opinion that the house is protected from the rain. Staff does not agree that there is an urgency because of weather conditions. However, because of the applicant's perceived urgency, we have placed the matter on the City Council's October 4th agenda. Because of the lack of time available between the Commission's action last night and getting the report and agenda out today, the Planning Commission's minutes will only be in rough draft. The Planning Commission will not have reviewed or approved those minutes. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at extension 4301. BB:ma Attachment: Appeal Letter Dated September 28, 2000 THE C ITY OF I~ANCrlO CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE: October 4, 2000 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF APPEAL - WHITE - An appeal of the Planning Commission's denial of a building permit to re-roof with standing seam metal on a house located at 6875 Pecan Avenue - APN: 227-254-02. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council deny the appeal and require replacement with suitable roof material. BACKG ROUND: The house was built in 1961 and has been re-roofed with different materials twice before and had structural modifications to the roof framing, which are outlined in the attached Planning Commission staff report. The Building & Safety Division could find no record of building permits issued by the City or the County for the previous re-roofs or structural work. The house had an asphalt shingle roof before the standing seam metal roof was installed. According to the roofing contractor, the entire roof underlayment and approximately one third of a standing seam metal roof was installed before the contractor applied for a building permit. POLICY: The Planning Commission has had a policy since the mid-1980s requiring tile roofs on new construction. Re-roofs to replace other roof materials (i.e., wood shake, asphalt shingle, etc.) were deemed exempt from the tile policy. The Planning Commission policy is to allow re-roofs with the same material that is being replaced, This exemption was an acknowledgement of the fact that tile roof materials can be heavier, which could require expensive structural upgrades to existing homes. ANALYSIS: The issue is one of aesthetics, not of quality. Staff and the Planning Commission ~cknowledge that metal roofing is a high quality material that is both durable and capable of withstanding high winds. The question is whether a standing seam metal roof is compatible with the Etiwanda community. The property is located within the Etiwanda Specific Plan (ESP). The architectural guidelines of the ESP state that projects "shall be designed in a manner that is CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CONSIDERATION OF APPEAL - WHITE October 4, 2000 Page 2 Sensitive to, and compatible with, the character of the surrounding area." Desired architectural and design elements which relate to the existing character are best described by the ESP as: · rural, rather than urban · informal, rather than formal · traditional, rather than contemporary · rustic, rather than polished Staff believes that a standing seam metal roof material is inconsistent with the desired character of the Etiwanda community. Although standing seam metal roof material can be found in several projects in Rancho Cucamonga, it has not been allowed for single-family tract home construction. There are a variety of roof materials in the neighborhood; however, none with standing seam metal roofing. The nearby Etiwanda Intermediate School was recently remodeled with metal "tile" roof; however, schools are exempt from local zoning regulations and exempt from the City's design review process. The City Planner indicated that metal roof material could be approved, such as , shingle, shake or tile forms, which would be consistent with common home roof materials in Etiwanda. DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE: Because of the policy implications, the City Planner referred this matter to the Committee (McNiel, StewarL Coleman) on September 11, 2000. The roofing contractor and roof material supplier presented photographs of the standing seam metal roof installed on the subject property (Exhibit" D") and manufacturers technical data (Exhibit "E"). The appellant did not attend the meeting. The contractor felt that the new Sam Maloof residence at the northeast corner of Carnelian Street and Hidden Farm Road, which has a standing seam metal roof, was justification for citywide use of metal roofing, Staff indicated that the original Maloof residence, a local historic landmark, was built prior to incorporation. The new residence was only allowed to continue using standing seam metal roof for historic authenticity with the original house, which is being relocated onto the same property. The Committee recommended denial of the standing seam metal roof material. pLANNNG COMMISSION: Seven Etiwanda neighbors of the appellant testified in support of allowing the standing seam metal roof. One Alta Loma resident testified in opposition to approving the appeal. The appellant and the roofing supplier believe that only a standing seam metal roof material can be used on the 2:12 roof pitch of the subject home; however, the Building Official indicates that other roof materials (i.e., wood shake, asphalt shingle, and metal) can be used. The roofing supplier has submitted catalogs of a wide range of metal roof materials that could be used with proper underlayment, including the look of shake, shingle, or tile. The roofing supplier has Offered to replace the roof material at no cost to the property owner; however, the appellant declined. The Planning Commission's decision was based upon the following: · Standing seam metal roof is not compatible with neighborhood and the architectural guidelines of the ESP. · Standing seam metal roof has not been allowed on any residences, except for the Maloof residence. · Roofing was installed without building permit. · Roof supplier has offered to replace roof with acceptable material at no cost. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CONSIDERATION OF APPEAL - WHITE October 4, 2000 Page 3 ALTERNATIVES: 1. Replace with "tile look," "shake," or "shingle" metal roof material. 2. Replace with an architectural grade asphalt shingle. Respectfully submitted, City Planner BB\ma Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Appeal Letter Dated September 28, 2000 Exhibit "B" - Planning Commission Staff Report Exhibit "C" - Planning Commission Draft Minutes :H THE CITY OF III I~ANCHO CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE: September 27, 2000 TO:. Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF APPEAL -WHITE - An appeal of the City Planners denial of a building permit to re-roof with standing seam metal on a house located at 6875 Pecan Avenue - APN: 227-254-02, BACKGROUND: The house was built around 1960 as part of a subdivision across the street from Etiwanda Intermediate School. According to the property owner, the original roof material was rock. The owner also indicated that the roof has been replaced twice and the proposed metal roofing will be the third re-roofing of his home. Prior to the Citys incorporation, the roof was replaced with tile. No record of a building permit was found in the County or the City for the first or second re-roofing. The weight of the tile roof caused the structure to sag. The tile roof was removed, the structure was reinforced, and a 40-year asphalt shingle roof was installed. The asphalt single roof began to deteriorate after 15 years. The property owner desired to install a roof that would last; hence, selected a standing seam metal roof material with a Kynar 500 green patina finish that resembles weathered copper. Approximately one third of the standing seam metal roof was installed before the contractor contacted the City to obtain a building permit on August 16, 2000. To date, no building permits were issued for the re-roofing or the structural reinforcements. The City Planner denied the building permit on September 11,2000, following the Design Review Committee meeting. POLICY: The Planning Commission has had a policy requiring tile roofs on new construction since the mid-1980s. Re-roofs to replace other roof materials (i.e., wood shake, asphalt shingle, etc.) were deemed exempt from the tile policy. The Planning Commission policy was to allow re-roofs using the same material that was being replaced. This exemption was an acknowledgement of the fact that tile roof materials can be heavier, which could require expensive structural upgrades to existing buildings. ANALYSIS: The issue is one of aesthetics, not of quality. Metal roofing is a high quality material that is both durable and capable of withstanding high winds. This product has been tested to International Conference of Building Officials (ICBO) highest standard, which is an 80 mile per hour wind (manufacturer claims it will withstand winds up to 120 mph). A wide variety of metal roof Ex l r " . PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CONSIDERATION OF APPEAL - WHITE September 27, 2000 Page 2 materials are available, including the look of shake, shingle, or tile. The manufacturer provides a 50-year guarantee, and this particular product, with the undedayment, meets Class "A" roofing standards, according to the roofing contractor. The cost of standing seam metal roofing is higher than other roof materials. The question is whether a standing seam metal roof is compatible with the Etiwanda community. The property is located within the Etiwanda Specific Plan (ESP). The architectural guidelines of the ESP state that projects "shall be designed in a manner that is sensitive to, and compatible with, the character of the surrounding area." Desired architectural and design elements which relate to the existing character are best described by the ESP as: ·rural, rather than urban · informal, rather than formal · traditional, rather than contemporary · rustic, rather than polished Staff believes that a standing seam metal roof material is inconsistent with the desired character of the Etiwanda community. Although standing seam metal roof material can be found in several projects in Rancho Cucamonga, it has not been allowed for single-family tract home construction. There are no houses within the subject subdivision with metal roofing. The nearby Etiwanda Intermediate School was recently remodeled with metal "tile" roof; however, schools are exempt from local zoning regulations and exempt from the City's design review process. The City Planner indicated that metal roof material could be approved, such as shingle, shake or tile forms, which would be consistent with common home roof materials in Etiwanda. DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE: Due to the policy implications, the City Planner referred this matter to the Committee (McNiel, Stewart, Coleman) on September 11,2000. The roofing contractor and roof material supplier presented photographs of the standing seam metal roof installed on the subject property (Exhibit" D") and manufacturers technical data (Exhibit "E"). The contractor felt that the new Sam Maloof residence at the northeast corner of Carnelian Street and Hidden Farm Road, which has a standing seam metal roof, was justification for citywide use of metal roofing. Staff indicated that the original Maloof residence, a local historic landmark, was built prior to incorporation. The new residence was only allowed to continue using standing seam metal roof for historic authenticity with the original house, which is being relocated onto the same property. The Committee recommended denial of the standing seam metal roof material. ALTERNATIVES: The Planning Commission should consider the following alternatives: 1. Replace with "tile look", "shake" or "shingle" metal roof material. The roofing supplier has offered to replace the roof material at no cost to property owner. 2. Replace with an architectural grade asphalt shingle. 3. Approve the standing seam metal roof. f17 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CONSIDERATION OF APPEAL - WHITE September 27, 2000 Page 3 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends denial of the appeal by upholding the decision of the City Planner; therefore, requiring replacement with suitable roof material. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB\ma Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Initial Letter of Denial Dated September 11,2000 Exhibit "B" - Applicant's Response Letter Dated September 18, 2000 Exhibit "C"~ Site Plan/Roof Plan Exhibit "D" - Photographs Exhibit "E" - Manufacturers Specifications T H E C I T Y 0 F i ANCI-IO CUCA ONCA September 11,2000 Mr. Bill White 6875 Pecan Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 SUBJECT: BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION TO RE-ROOF HOUSE AND GARAGE Dear Mr. White: At the recommendation of the Design Review Committee, I hereby deny the Building Permit application to re-roof the house and garage located at 6875 Pecan Avenue with a standing seam metal roof. My decision is final following a ten-day appeal period which ends September 21,2000. Appeals must be filed in writing with the Planning Commission Secretary, state the reason for the appeal, and be accompanied by a $62 appeal fee. If you have any questions, please feel free to call our office at (909) 477-2750. Sincerely, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING DIVISION City Planner BB:gs cc: Rory Davis, Fanning Roofing, Inc. Mayor William J. Alexander ~ Councilmember Paul Biane Mayor Pro-Tern Diane Willjams Councilmember Bob Du~lon Jack Lain. AICP, City Manager Councilmember James V. Curatalo 0500 Civic Center Drive · RO. Box 807 · Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 · [909] 477-2700 FAX [909] 477-2849 . .c,.ra.c.e-cucamonoo.co.u. //,/ Mr. & Mrs. Bill White 6875 Pecan Ave. Etiwanda, CA 91739 (909) 899-1315 _Received 09/18/2000 ] Brad Buller City Planner . City oE ~ancho CucamonSa 10500 Civic Center ~ancho Cuc~on~a, CA 9]729 (909) 4??-2750 ~. Buller In res~nse to your le~er dating 09/11/2000, yoa de~al of my request for a Roofing Petit is ve~ displeasing to my ~fe and I. I have token many hours of my time researc~ng roofing products to fit not only my nee~ but the needs of a product that will ~rfom long after I am gone. I have had a Concrete Tile roof on my house that did not work so I tried a 4o-year composition roof that only lasmd liffie over half it's life before wearing out. ~en I called the Ci~ Building Depamem to ~k for the requirements of roofing prMucts they said over the phone it only has to be a cl~s c roof or be~er for $y product installed ~r high ~nd s~cifications. They did not in an~ay tell me that looks were a maUer. I believe ~at there is no ci~ code prohibiting ~is roof to date on looks alone. Therefore, I bought and paid for a Standing Seam Me~ Roof made by Custom Built Metals. I stand by my decision in proceeding with an ap~al ofyourjud~ent of denial. My house is not just a house bm my HO~ my wife and I have lived in for 40 years. I also do not like your reference to my house in any way m ~ refeffed as or look like a trailer. Respectfully, ~ Bill White CC: Mayor William J. Alexander, Mayor Pro-Tern Diane Williams, City Manager Jack Lam, Councilmember Paul Biane, Councilmember Bob Dunon, Councilmember James V. Curatalo, Tim Brown Custom Built Metals, Tony Chiovare President Custom Built Metals, John Cayer Legal Council Custom Built Metals, Michael Black VP Sales BHP Metals, Rory Davis Fanning Roofing, Jim Fanning Fanning Roofing, Daily Bulletin Mike Rappaport. g yAT/oo i( ILL T .,2, ga,e 20. PlOt P1 n a 81' Bill White ~ 62. 6875 Pecan Ave. ~'~ Etiwanda, CA 91739 ~ ,o6 (909) 899-13 15 ! 2' gate 45 Victoria Make the next roof you install the last roof you'll ever need. Now you can, with one of the many styles of roofing supplied by Custom-Bilt Metals, a national metal supply company doing business for over 25 years. Each of our roofing products belongs to our family of LAST-TIME® Metal Building Products. This means that each one of our LAST-TIME® Metal Roofs is guaranteed to last a lifetime. The CB-150 Titan® Standing Seam Roof Panel is most co~only selected for ~e following applications: e over solid decks e light s~cmral use - in modified fore, soffit p~els and ~cades This p~el features: e roll-fosed on fie job site or in the factory e conceded ~stener installation which allows the~al movement e Kynar 500 Paint System · Siliconized Modified Polyester · available in 16 colors L,A~ui'i,%'~5_® Metal Roofing - Only available through Custom-Bilt Metals... for the last roof you'll ever need - Guaranteed! Supplying Aluminum, Steel and Copper Rooting Products \\ 8 26-7 8 3 www. custonlbiltmetals. corn / Z ~ WHOLESALE METAL SUPPLY CB-150 Titan® Standing Seam Roof Panel Supply Facilities New Orleans (504) 734-0404 Kansas City Tulsa This product is most commonly selected for the fo~owing applications: (918) 832-9638 ® over solid decks or a spaced purlin system Dallas ·light structural use Houston · in modified form, soffit panels and facades (713) 690-1113 Product Features [~hoenix 2517 W. McDowell #113, Phoenix, AZ 85009 t dual stiffening ribs (optional) (602) 484-7015 · panel height is 1.5" Honotulu 5 Sand Island A~cess Bd. · panel widths from 12" wide to 24" wide. The two most common widths are 12" and 16" Sldg 928, ~0+ Box 138, Honolulu, HI 968t9 ® panel is recommended for roof slopes as low as 1" in 12" (see CBM rep.) Seattle · panel available in grade D, 26 gauge and 24 gauge material and special order 28 gauge 22211 76thAvenue So., Kent, WA 98032 ! Air Bag Test #ASTM-E1592 information available on this panel Spokane """"""" 'f r""'r IF Northern California1.5" Southern California % ~ (626) 579~5868 Manufacturing Centers Washington Texas Marketing CB-150 Allowable Uniform Load (Dead+-Live)-(PSF) FOr More [~rrtl~!ioll COrltOCf.' Washington Based on 24 gauge, 16" width (800) 826-7813 SPAN L~NG~TH (F.~ET) Headquarters SPAN LOAD/ ww,t~.custornbelfnletQls, corn DEFL { N ) 291 149 86 54 35 26 CB-150 PRODUCT SHED 10/99 /Z5 08:30 O0 ~IED 12 40 F~X 303 292 5013 ZI~[~,IER)IAS ~IETALS [~005 CErNY ,~ Ivey ENGINEERS, INC. 08/30/00 WED 12:40 FAX 303 292 5013 ZI~ERMAN METALS l~003 ALLOWABLE t~IND UPLIFT LOAD (PEF) FOR: Z- PANEL FORM SS1500 PANEL PANEL .~OF PANEL SPAN (FT.) GA 16" 2 .. .... 24 GA 16" 2 NOTES: 1. All calculations {or panel properties have been made in accordance with the 1986 edition of "Specification for Cold-Formed Steel Design Manual" published by American Iron end Steel Institute. 2. Values for 3 or more spans are based on { equal sp~ns. 3. These load capacities are for the paI~el itself. Frames, purlins, clips, ~asteners, and all supparts must be designed to resist load imposed by the panel. 4. Material: ASTM'A446 , grade "C" 5. All loads are in PSF. 6. Above capacities have been increased by 33-1/3% as per AISI sec. A4-4. 7. Minimum panel support bearing length = 3,00 in. CERNY ~ I '~ , v ENGINEERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGIN ESTING LABORATORY January 22, 1997 Engineering Report 96505-4 zimmerman Metals, Inc., SSlS00 Standing Seam Panel Uplift Test .SUMMARY Beginning Nove~uber 20, 1996, testing of Zimmerman Metals, Inc- SSl500 Standing Seam roof panels was performed to determine their loading characteristics under uniform static uplift loads. The panels were 16 inches wide with a nominal 1 1/2 inch mechanically formed Standing Seam rib, 24 gage, steel and were tested With spans of 3 feet, 6 inches and one foot. The panels were tested in accordance with ASTM E 1592, "Standard Test Method for Structural Performance of Sheet Metal Roof and siding Systems by Uniform Static Air Pressure Difference." The 3-foot, 6-inch span test specimen failed at an uplift load of 72.8 PSF when a seam separated'at the clips. The 1 foot span test specimen was tested to the limit of the chamber seal (127.9 PSF) with no failure. Respectively submitted, ' ' ~ Senior Laboratory Technician TECHNICAL SOCIETIES American Concrete institute National Fire ProieciiDn Associatjoll American So~ieby for Tcs,Jng & Me, teria~s Georgia Socle~/of Professional Engineers Nation'el SOCiety of PrDfessionaI Engineers ,American ~ociezy of Civil En?jn?cjs . Instilute of Eie=~rical & ElectrDnic )=nginc!ers .Soc!cty to.r .Exporin!ental M.echani::~ STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS FOR: 16" WIDE SS1500 PANEL Preparea For: Zi~ermanMetals, Inc. 201 E. 58TH Ave. Denver, Colorado 80216 Prepared B~: Lavi & Associates Consulting Engineers 9550 Porest Lane, Suite 313 Dallas, Texas 75243 ALLOWABLE LIVE LOAD (PSF) FOR: Z- PANEL FORM SS1500 PANEL PANEL ~OF PANEL SPAN (FT.) SPANS 2.0 ~ 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 ._4_..5 5.0 5.5 GA 16" 2 ... 22 1. All calculations for panel propertles have been made in accordance' with the 1986 edition of "Specification Eof Cold-Formed Steel Design Manual" published by American Iron and Steel Institute. 2. Values ~or 3 or more spmns are based on 4 equal spans. 3. These load capacities are ~or the panel itself. Frames, purlins, claps, ~esteners, and all supports must be designed to resist load imposed by the panel. 4. Material: ASTM A446 gra~e "C" 5. All loads are in PSF. 6. Minimum panel support bearing length = 3.00 in. 7. Loads are calculated for deflection not to excee~ 1/240 o~ the span. ICBO Evaluation Service, Inc. 5360 WORKMAN MILL ROAD · WHITI'IER, CALIFORNIA 90601-2299 A subsidiary corporation of the International Conference of Building Officials EVALUATION REPORT ER-4566 Copyright© 1999 ICBO Evaluation Service, Inc. Reissued October 1, 1999 Filing Category: ROOF-COVERING AND ROOF DECK CONSTRUCTION--ROof Covering (202) STANDING SEAM METAL ROOFING In areas subject to wind-driven snow, ice build-up or wind- CUSTOM-BILT METALS driven dust or sand, two layers of Type 15 felt undedayment 9845 JOE VARGAS WAY are applied shingle fashion and are continuously cemented SOUTH EL MONTE, CALIFORNIA 91733 together with approved cementing material between the plies. Interply cementing is only required to extend from the 1.0 SUBJECT eaveupthemoftoapoint36inches(914mm)insidetheexte_ Standing Seam Metal Roofing. dot wall line Of the building. Special anchor clips supplied by Custom-Bilt are then se- 2.0 DESCRIPTION cured to the deck using a minimum of two No. 10 by 3/4-inch (19.1 ram) screws per clip, ~paced a maximum of 48 inches 2.1 Steel Panels: (1219 mm) on center. SeeFigure2.1ndeferminingclipselec. The Custom-Biit standing seam steel roof panels are pres* lion, placement and method of attachment, consideration s ure-formed from 0.024-inch-thick (0.61 ram) (No. 24 gage), must be given to thermal movement, uplift loads and the build- 0.018 inches thick (0.46 ram) (No. 26 gage) or O .015 inch thick ing structure. Justifying calculations must be submitted to the (0.38 ram) (No. 28 gage) cold-formed sheet steel, The steel building official for each installation. conforms to ASTM A792, Grade 50A, with an aluminum-zinc Accessories such as gutters, drip angles. fascias, ridge alloy coating designation of AZ55. The profiles are formed to caps, window or gable trim, valley and hip fiashings, etc., are 8-inch-, 12-inch-. 16-inch-, 20-inch or 24-inch-wide (203 ram, fabdcatod to suit each job condition. Suggested details are 305 ram, 406 mm, 508 mm or 610 ram) panels with 90- or shown in Figure 3. Details must be submitted to the building 180.degree, 1r/2.inch.high(38mm)seams. The panels are · official for each instailation. roll formed at the jobsite to provide the standing seams be- 2.3~ FIre Classification: The steel panels ~re considered tween panels, which are roll-closed over anchor clips by an Class A roof coverings when installed in the manner de- electronically driven, self-propelled seamar. See Figure I for scdbed in Section 2.3.1 with the exception that one ayer of further details. 43*pound (19.4 kg) asphalt roofing felt, such as GS Cornmar- The No. 24 gage panels have an installed weight of approxi- cjal Products All WeatherEmpire, and one layer of 75-pound mately 1 pound per square foot (4.8 kg/m2), the No. 26 gage (33.8 kg) fiberglass asphalt sheet, such as Gafglass #75 panels have an installed weight of 0,76 pound per square foot Base Sheet, are used as undedayment in lieu of felt. (3.7 kg/m2) and the No. 28 gage panels have an installed The aluminum panels are considered Class B roof cover- weight of 0.63 pound per square foot (3.1 kg/m2). ings when installed in the manner described in Section 2.3.1, with the exception that two layers of 72-pound (32.6 kg) fiber- 2.2 Aluminum Panels: ' glass cap sheet, suchasManvilleGlasKapmineraisurraced The Custom-Bill aluminum roof panels are similar in shape to fiberglass roofing, are used as underlayment in lieu of felt. the steel panels and are pressure-formed from 0,025-inch- 2.4 Identification: thick (0.64 ram) (No. 22 B. and S. gage) a~d O.032-inch-thick The matadal is identified with a label bearing the name of the (0.81 ram) (No. 20 B. and S. gage) aluminum alloy complying manufacturer, the material b/be, and the gage. with ASTM B 209, Alloy 5005, temper H14. The panels are coated with a titanlure phosphate base coat covered with 3.0 EVIDENCE SUBMITfED 1 -rail-thick (0.025 ram) polyester paint. The No. 22 gage pan- Data in accordance with the ICBO ES Acceptance Criteria for eta have an installed weight of 0.5 pound per square foot (2.4 Special Roofing Systems (AC07). dated Apdl 1999. kg/m2), and the No. 20 gage panels have an installed weight 4.0 FINDINGS of 0.6 pound per square foot (2.9 kg/m2). That the Custom*Bitt roof panels described in this report 2.3 Installation: comply with the 1997 Uniform Building Code ~, subject 2.3.1 General: The roof panels are installed over solid to the following conditions: sheathingcomplyingwiththecode. The sheathing is covered 4.1 Panels are manufactured, identified and installed with a minimum of two layers of Type 15 or one layer of Type in accordance with this report and the manufactur- 30 felt underlaymerit, installed in accordance with the code. er's instructions. The panels are installed on roofs having a minimum slope of 4.2 Installations arelimited to areas having a maximum 1:12, provided there are no horizontal joints in the plane of the basic wind speed of 80 miles per hour (129 kin/h) on roof. Installations on roofs having a slope greater than 3:12 buildings up to 40 feet (12 192 ram) in height in Ex- may have horizontal joints. posure B areas. {fatlon ~tor use o~ t~e subject re~ort. ~age ~> of 3 ER-4566 4.3 The roofing systems are limited to a minimum and other flashing must be submitted to the build- slope of 1:12 and a maximum slope of 21:12. ing official for approval. For each installation, justifying calculations for an- chor clip placement and details for ridge, valley, hip This report is subject to re-examination In two years, HOOK RIB OPTIONAL PENCIL RIBS ~TANDINGRIB OFILE SECOND PROF~ FIGURE 1---CUSTOM-BUILT PANEL FIGURE 2-.-AI~CROR CLIPS ~age '3 of 3 ER..4566 RIDGE CAPS CONTINUOUS RIDGE CLIP RIOGE CAP (22 CA) NEOPRENE CLOSURE STRIP VALLEYS DEKTITE' PiPE FLASHING Dektite" is a one-p ece E.P.D.M. rubber cone equi ped w th a ribbed flange, which provides a weather seal while allowing for movement and vibration It fits any pipe size, panel configuration or roof p~tc~. The corrosion-resistant bonded dng at the base is 1 -ram-thick aluminum--1100-0, a flexible aitol that bands to conform to panel configurations. HEADWALL FLASHING FLAT PROFILE PROVIDES ~ LIMITED MOVEMENT CLOSURE STRIP FIGURE 3---TYPICAL iNSTALLATION DETAILS Custom-Bilt Metal Roof Chosen For Better Homes And Gardens "Blueprint 2000" Home How do you top a home that is designed to showcase the best home building and design ideas for the next cen- tury? For the editors who developed Better Homes And Gardens magazine's "Blueprint 2000" home, the answer was simple: a metal roof. The home, which was inspired by the responses from surveys asking sub- scribers to describe their "dream home' for the 21 st century, lealures more lharr 3,000 sq. fl. of standing seals1 ................. ~ .... metal roofing, supplied by This Chapel Hill, NC, '~dream hon~e", designed by Better Hon'~es And CustOm-Bil~ Metals, a long- Gardens, features 3,000 sq. ft. of ~etal standing sea~ roofing time leader in the painted sapplied by Custo~-Bilt Metals. metal industry. Located in Chapel Hill, NC, "A Standing Seam metal attractive and Iongdasting a the "Blueprint 2000" hoff~e roof such as this is truly tl~e standing seam metal roof can incorporates the latest in inno- last root a homeowner will be." vatire and attainable designs, ever need to install," noted Custom-Bilt Metals has hon~e furnishings, high-tech Tony Chiovare, president of been a leading supplier in the products and materials, to Custom-Bilt Metals. The rooPs painted metal industry since create the ultimate house for polymer ceramic coating i$ 1974, and currently stocks the new' centu~', acording to designed to endure decades more than 2,000 different Joan McCloskey Better of salt air, humidity, acid rain items in its 14 national branch Homes And Gardens building and ultraviolet radiation with- locations. Custom-Bilt is a editor. out fading, chipping or peel- leading supplier of standing "Readers want the outside ing. seam metal roofing systems or their dreai~ house to cling The standing seam metal fabricated from steel, alu- to the traditions of the past," roof, finished in a Weathered minum or copper, as well as she noted. Yet, readers also Copper color, is both aestheti- Kynar-finished steel tile, steel said low-maintenance was an cally pleasing and architec- shingles, aluminum shake important concern, so the edi- turally appropriate for the and steel or copper shingles. tots chose a standing seam home's classic exterior For more information, circle metal roof that met both design, Chiovare added. reader se~ice ~ 158. those requirements. "The design is an increas- i The 3,000 sq. ft. "Blueprint ingly popular choice among 2000" home was featured in a homeowners who want to special extended editiorial maintain the clean, classic section of the Better Homes lines of a traditional metal ~d Gardens November 1999 roof," he said. "We were ve~ issue. It was also featured in pleased to be asked to partici- a popular exhibit the maga- pate in this showcase home, zine sponsored in shopping which gives us an opportuni- malls in major cities through- ty to demonstrate to millions out the U.S. last fall. of homeowners just how Titan SL- 100- Sierra Tan DRAFT - FOR DISCUSSION ONLY CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Regular Meeting September 27, 2000 Chairman McNiel called the Regular Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission to order at 7:00p.m. The meeting was held in the Council Chamber at Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Chairman McNiel then led in the pledge of allegiance. ROLL CALL COMMISSIONERS: PRESENT: Rich Macias, John Mannedno, Larry McNiel, Pam Stewart, Peter Tolstoy ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Brad Buller, City Planner; Dan Coleman, Principal Planner; Kevin Ennis, Assistant City Attorney; Nancy Fong, Senior Planner; Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer; Lois Schrader, Secretary; Kirt Coury, Associate Planner; Tom Grahn, Associate Planner; Alan Warren, Associate Planner; Mike Smith, Planning Technician ANNOUNCEMENTS No announcements were made at this time. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Motion: Moved by Pam Stewart, seconded by Rich Macias, carried 4-0-1 (Tolstoy abstain), to approve the minutes of the Adjoumed Meeting of August 23, 2000. CONSENT CALENDAR PUBLIC HEARINGS Planning Commission Minutes -1- September 27, 2000 129'!1 DRAFT - FOR DISCUSSION ONLY NEW BUSINESS P. CONSIDERATION OF APPEAL- WHITE -An appeal of the City Planner's denial of a building permit to re-roof with standing seam metal on a house located at 6875 Pecan Avenue- APN:227- 254-02. Brad Buller, City Planner, gave the staff report, briefly giving a chronology of the events that led up to the appeal before the Planning Commissioners. Mr. Buller noted that there had been much discussion regarding the cdteda outlined in the Etiwanda Specific Plan and the subject of metal roofs in the City in general. He reported that Chairman McNiel and Commissioner Stewart visited the site and both had recommended denial of the proposed roof based upon the design elements listed in the Etiwanda Specific Plan. He noted that the home was built pdor to the adopted of the Etiwanda Specific Plan and they observed that the appellant's home would be the only one in the neighborhood with a standing seam metal roof. He noted that they have tried to explain the design elements of the ESP with the owner and contractor. Mr. Buller noted that the Etiwanda Specific Plan does not specifically prohibit metal roofs but that staff is aware of some metal roofs in the area, however, they are simulated to look like tile and or shingles in design and therefore project a different character than a standing seam metal roof. Mr. BuUer reported that the issue of the roof came to staffs attention after the project had been started. He noted the Building Official was in attendance to answer questions regarding permits and materials. Chairman McNiel opened the public headrig and asked if there were any questions. Bill White, 6875 Pecan Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, the appellant, stated he and his wife built the house in 1960 and have resided there for 40 years. He stated that he's seen copper roofs that cost $60,000 to install but because of the cost, he decided to go with a copper looking metal roof. He reported that his contractor, Tim Brown, showed him many examples of metal roofs on very expensive homes in other cities. He reported that he called the Building and Safety Department prior to purchasing the roof material and asked what was required. He reported that they said the roof had to be a Class "C" roof or better to be installed for high wind conditions. He added that nothing was said about aesthetic requirements. He noted that the roof he chose withstands 120 mile per hour winds and that the paint is guaranteed for 30 years. The roof was cut but then he said that all work was stopped because they did not have a permit and now the uninstalled portion of the roof is in his backyard. Mr. White placed a picture of a home in Rancho Cucamonga with a metal roof. He noted that he and his wife Dorothy feel discriminated against. He added that all of the Planning staff he came in contact with were very courteous. Chairman McNiel asked where the picture was taken. Mr. White chose not to answer the question, stating that he did not wish to cause any trouble for anyone else. Commissioner Stewart reported that she was a member of the Design Review Committee. She asked Mr. White if he realized that the issue could be resolved if metal shingles were used instead of the standing seam metal and that they are only trying to resolve the issue. She asked Mr. White if he had been offered the alternative. Planning Commission Minutes -2- September 27, 2000 DRAFT - FOR DISCUSSION ONLY Mr. White initially responded, he had not been offered an alternative by the contractor, but then responded "yes," adding that he would have copper if it was paid for by someone else. Then he stated that he does not want anything else other than what he bought. Commissioner Tolstoy asked if the work on the roof installation was already in progress when the person came in for the permit. Mr. Responded affirmatively. Commissioner Tolstoy asked if it is the preferred way to do things in this City, to pull a permit is before a project is begun. Mr. Bullet stated that it is. Commissioner Mannerino interjected that it is the law to do so. Chairman McNiel opened the public hearing. 3ohn Lyons, stated that Bill White is a legend in Etiwanda because of his collection of antiques in his yard. He added that he (Mr White) is known for doing everything "first class." He expressed his opinion that Mr. White should be allowed to have the roof he wants and that the City Council allowed the other appellant to "slide" (Badtier) why not let Mr. White slide as well. Rory Davis, 11618 Rosano Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, stated he works for Fanning Roofing and that his company installed the roof. He stated that it is unfortunate that a portion of the roof was laid prior to a permit being pulled, and that the material was bought and paid for before they even arrived on the job site. He stated that he has never been denied a permit for this type of roof because Of how it looks. He reported that he had spoken with the Building Official and that he was told by the Official that what was laid may have to be lifted to facilitate inspection. Mr. Davis said he wants to appease his client and to give him the best roof for him. He noted that Mr. White is mainly concerned about the longevity of the material, high wind resistance, resistance to fire and the weight of the material. He suggested that they look at what performs well in the City. Mr. Davis reported that the handouts supplied by the Building and Safety Department are based upon high winds but nothing else is mentioned. He added that it is a homeowners dght to paint his/her house purple or pink if he/she chooses to do so; Mr. White chose a roof that lasts. He admitted that there was a mix-up with obtaining the permit but asked the Commissioners to make an intellectual decision as opposed to an emotional one. Jim Frost handle things when a new and better material comes into the marketplace. He commented that there will not be a proliferation of standing seam metal roofs because they are too costly. He felt the decision should be made to protect future residents and that he does not feel there is a violation, He stated that they should get back to the real issue. He remarked that he is the past Chairman of the Etiwanda Specific Plan Advisory Committee and that many modifications have taken place since it was put into place, some he agreed with, some not. He commented that there is diversity and variety in Etiwanda and that there are some who have violated the standards. Mr. Frost stated that he feels the City needs to fix its design requirements and get standardized. He said that in his opinion, Mr. Buller has been forced into a corner because of the plan and that the current plan prevents staff and citizens from being creative. He added that the "Victoria Tract" has no standards. He rhetorically asked if a precedent was being set and how would the staff handle things when a new and better material comes into the marketplace. He commented that there will notbeaproliferationofstandingseammetalroofsbecausetheyaretoocostly. Hefeltthedecision Planning Commission Minutes -3- September 27, 2000 DRAFT - FOR DISCUSSION ONLY should be made to protect future residents and that he does not feel there is a violation. He asked the Planning Commission to come back to what is reasonable. Carolyn Preschern, noted that she and her husband are contractors working all over the United States and soon, worldwide. She asked the Planning Commission to deny the appeal because contractors should follow the set procedures and take care of business in the proper way. She voiced her support of Mr. Buller and the staff in the issue. She added that permits are pulled first and plans should be thoroughly discussed with staff before starting a job. She commended staff for upholding good standards. Lynette Allen, reported that she had written a letter to Mr. Rappaport of the Inland Valley Bulletin. She noted that the letter is being forwarded to the City Council. She mentioned that the roof looks rural to her, much like a barn roof. She added thal she supports Mr. White's choice and that she lives in the neighborhood and she approves. She commented that his home is beautiful and that she does not understand the opposition. She pointed out the there is a home next to the Etiwanda Fire Station that is formal in design, a stucco box that sticks out and that it does not fit in with a rural setting. She stated she contacted 60 homeowners and collected 65 signatures. She added that there is no law that says he can't have the metal roof and that is what he purchased. She asked what the Etiwanda Specific Plan was and what it was for. Chairman McNiel explained that the Etiwanda Specific Plan was developed in 1982 to identifi/and outline what would be developed in that area. He noted that he was unfamiliar with the house she referred to in her comments. He stated that the plan says what you can use and that there are policy decisions, not all issues are "cast in stone" or are part of an ordinance. He asserted that the Commissioners advised Mr. Buller in this decision and that there are issues where City Council gives them guidance as well. David Long, Yvonne Dempsey, Antonio Roddguez, and Andrea Bonanno voiced their support for the appellant for the following reasons: 1. They like the way it looks, and since they live in the neighborhood, their opinion should matter. 2. Mr. White is a good neighbor, 3. If a person makes a mistake, do not penalize him over a technicality. 4. Mr. White has a beautiful home 5. The existing neighborhood already has a wide vadety of roofing materials 6. Metal roofs do exist in Etiwanda, The roofing at Etiwanda Intermediate School has 2 different kinds of metal roof. Tim Brown, stated that he is the sales rep for the manufacturer that sold Mr. White the roof material. He stated that one way or the other, he would see to it that Mr. White gets a roof. He explained that because Mr White's house has a low pitch, the standing seam roof is the only type of roof that will work on the house including tile, slate and shake. He said that it he has started a job Monday morning and pulled the permit later in the day and that he has done it 100 times, it is common in the industry. He added that he has never been denied a permit and that he has pulled permits many times after starting a job. Chairman McNiel closed the public hearing. Chairman McNiel commented that if someone actually paints their house purple or pink, someone would pay attention, He added that the City does not have jurisdiction over what materials schools use, only cursory review. He added that there are a number of metal roofs in the City in the Planning Commission Minutes -4- September 27, 2000 DRAFT - FOR DISCUSSION ONLY commercial and industria~ areas and that the Planning Commission has had many bad experiences with them. Headded thatmanydonotlookgoodafterseveralyears. Headdedthatwedonothave many of them in residential areas. He noted that because of the negative experiences, metal roofs became a policy issue. He asserted that they (the Planning Commissioners) gave Mr. Buller the direction and that the policy is a good one; it prevents a proliferation of metal roofs. He explained that the home shown on the overhead earlier is the Maloof house, and that the original house was donewhentheareawasstillcountyjudsdiction. HeexplainedthattheydiscussedinDesignReview that there was no reason to change their position, the policy is in place to protect the entire community and that if we approve this one, more will follow. He added that he understands the sentiment of the neighbors and their support of Mr. White. Commissioner Macias recalled a similar issue a few months ago (Badder) where the roof was already on before a permit was pulled. He asserted that Design Guidelines and processes are in place. He said that staff does not need to defend its process, it works. It is similar in that someone made a mistake and that it is between the applicant and the contractor. He added that the process istoapplyforpermits. HepointedoutthatthedesignelementsshownonPageP-2oftheagenda packet are vague and that they may need to look at them, but that he feels it is important to be consistent with how he viewed the issue a few months ago, and that was to deny the appeal, not because the process is flawed but because to approve the appeal would be an affront to those who do things correctly. He concluded by supporting the staff position to deny the appeal. Commissioner Mannedno said that this is a difficult issue because he, in the previous issue (Badder), voted to grant the appeal, because he had some objections to the standards. He noted that the fact that the roof was non-permitted in itially ended the issue in his mind legally until he heard tonight's testimony. He stated he was not moved to deny the appeal, but that he was inclined to vote and that there is a penalty to pay if procedures are not followed. He added that Code Enforcement was within their dght to stop the project. He commented that he did not like the aesthetics of the roof nor does he like the standards that rely upon the whim of whomever may occupy his chair on the Commission. He expressed his concern over the way the law is wdtten, and that if a great, new roof material came out, we would have no way to approve it the way our standards are written. He added that with no permit he will support the City Planner because pulling a permit is required. He said that he does not like the roof ordinance. Commissioner Tolstoy said that the metal roof is not compatible with the neighborhood or the Etiwanda Specific Plan. He added that he did not feel the language in the plan is specific enough. He added that he is not against metal roofs, just the appearance of this one. Commissioner Stewart stated she had nothing to add. Chairman McNiel called for the motion. Motion: Moved by Macias, seconded by Stewart, to deny the appeal. Motion carded by the following vote: AYES: MACIAS, MCNIEL, STEWART,TOLSTOY NOES: MANNERINO ABSENT: - carried Mr. Buller commented that because of the presence of many community members that served on the team that developed the Etiwanda Specific Plan, he suggested that there are provisions in the process to go back and revisit the standards for roofing material, and if standing seam metal roofs Planning Commission Minutes -5- September 27, 2000 I ;z9 15 DRAFT - FOR DISCUSSION ONLY are something that the community would like to see more of, concerned community members can use the appropriate forum and go through the process to have the standards forthe Etiwanda area amended. PUBLIC COMMENTS COMMISSION BUSINESS ADJOURNMENT Motion: Moved by# The Planning Commission adjourned at# p.m. TO A WORKSHOP? The I workshop adjourned at ~ p.m. and those minutes appear separatety. Respectfully submiRed, Brad Buller Secretary Planning Commission Minutes -6- September 27, 2000 i2 -Ib SktffRe rt DATE: October 4, 2000 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: James C. Frost, City Treasurer BY: Lawrence I. Temple, Administrative Services Director SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO ADOPT ANNUAL STATEMENT OF INVESTMENT POLICY RECOMMENDATION Annually the City Council reviews the Statement of Investment Policy. It is reconmqended that the City Council approve and adopt the attached Statement of Investment Policy for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. BACKGROUND The City Council adopted a Statement of Investment Policy in July 1987. California Government Code, Section 53646, requires the City Treasurer to annually render to the City Council a Statement of Investment Policy, which shall be considered at a public meeting. Further, the City Council must also consider any modifications to the investment policy at a public meeting. A new provision is being added to the policy for your consideration this year. The new section regarding "Independent Review" formally acknowledges the role of our independent auditors in their annual review of the City' s Investment Policy, process, and internal controls. The City's investment policy and practices are governed by State law. The primary goal of the City's policy is to enhance the economic standards of the City, to protect its pooled assets and to invest public funds prudently. These funds are accounted for in the Rancho Cucamonga Comprehensive Annual Financial Report and Council receives a monthly Portfolio Summary of investment earnings provided to the City Council at scheduled Council meetings. The City Treasurer and staff continue to monitor legislation, government code amendments, and professional practices pertaining to investing of public funds, ensuring amendments are reflected in the City's policy as required by local policy and state law and maintaining the most prudent investment policy as prescribed by the City Council. Respectfully submitted, City Treasurer JCF/LIT/sgr Attachments City Staff Report 00.doc -2- STATEMENT OF INVESTMENT POLICY CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA INTRODUCTION The investment policy and practices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga are based upon state law, prudent money management and the "prudent person" standards. This statement is intended to provide guidelines for the prudent investment of the City's temporary idle cash, and outline the policies for maximizing the efficiency of the City's cash management system. The primary goal of this policy is to enhance the economic status of the City by protecting its pooled cash and to invest public funds to: 1. Meet the daily cash flow needs of the City. 2. Comply with all laws of the State of California regarding investment of public funds. 3. Achieve a reasonable rate ofretum while minimizing the potential for capital losses arising from market changes or issuer default. SCOPE The investment policy applies to all investment activities of the City ofRancho Cucamonga. These funds are accounted for in the Rancho Cucamonga Comprehensive Annual Financial Report and include: General Fund, Special Revenue Funds, Capital Project Funds, Enterprise Funds, Trust and Agency Funds. Any new fund established by the City Council shall automatically be reflected in the Investment Policy. Bond proceeds shall be invested in accordance with the requirements and restrictions outlined in bond documents as approved by the City Council. PRUDENCE/EVALUATION OF INVESTMENT OFFICER ACTIONS The actions of the City Treasurer and/or his appointed designee in the performance of their duties as managers of public funds shall be evaluated using the following "prudent person" standard applied in the context of managing the overall portfolio: Rev: 9/2000 1 Investments shall be made with judgement and care, under circumstances then prevailing, which persons of prudence, discretion, and intelligence exercise in the professional management of their business affairs, not for speculation, but for investment, considering the probable safety of their capital as well as the probable income to be derived The City Treasurer and/or his appointed designee acting in accordance with the investment policy and the "prudent person" standard and exercising due diligence shall be relieved of personal responsibility for an individual security's credit risk or market price changes, provided that substantial deviations from expectations are reported in a timely manner and appropriate action is taken to control adverse developments whenever possible. OBJECTIVE The City of Rancho Cucamonga operates its temporary pooled idle cash investment under the "Prudent Person" standard. This affords the City a broad spectrum of investment opportunities as long as the investment is deemed prudent and is allowable under current legislation of the State of California (Government Code Section 53600, et. seq.) and other legal restrictions as the City may impose from time to time. The objective of the investment portfolio is to meet the short and long term cash flow demands of the City. To achieve this objective, the portfolio will be structured to provide Safety of Principal and Liquidity, while then providing a reasonable return on investments. INVESTMENT OBJECTIVES Security purchases and holdings will be maintained within statutory limits imposed by Government Code. City policy has been to limit investments more stringently than required under state law. Criteria for selecting investments and the order of priority are: 1. Safety - The safety and risk associated with an investment refers to the potential loss of principal, interest, or combination thereof. The City only operates in those investments that are considered safe. Investments shall be undertaken in a manner that seeks to ensure that capital losses resulting from institution default, broker/dealer default, or the erosion of market value are avoided. The City shall seek to preserve principal by mitigating the two types of risk: credit risk and market risk. · Credit risk, defined as the risk of loss due to failure of the issuer of a security, shall be mitigated by investing in only high quality securities and by diversifying the investment portfolio so that the failure of any one issuer would not unduly harm City cash flow. Re~.' 9/2000 2 Market risk, defined as the risk of market value fluctuations due to overall changes in the general level of interest rates, shall be mitigated by structuring the portfolio. It is explicitly recognized, however, that in a diversified portfolio, occasional measured loses may occur, and must be considered within the context of overall investment return. 2. Liquidity - This refers to the ability to "cash in" at any moment in time with minimal chance of losing some portion of principal or interest. Liquidity is an important investment quality especially when the need for unexpected funds occasionally occurs. The City's investment portfolio will remain sufficiently liquid to enable the City to meet operating requirements which might be reasonably anticipated. 3. Yield - The City's investment portfolio shall be designed with the objective of attaining a reasonable market rate ofreturu throughout economic cycles, as long as it does not diminish the objectives of Safety and Liquidity. ETHICS AND CONFLICTS OF INTEREST The Treasurer/Deputy Treasurer and employees involved in the investment process shall refrain from personal business activity that could conflict with proper execution of the investment program, or which could impair their ability to make impartial investment decisions. Employees and investment officers shall disclose any material financial interest in financial institutions that conduct business within this jurisdiction, and they shall further disclose any large personal financial/investment positions that could be related to the performance of the City's portfolio, particularly with regard to the time of purchases and sales. The Treasurer/Deputy Treasurer or investment employees are required to file annual disclosure statements as required by the Fair Political Practices Commission (FPPC). AUTHORIZED BROKER/DEALERS The City will transact business only with approved investment securities broker/dealers that are approved as an authorized broker/dealer in compliance with the City selection process. The Treasurer shall request all broker/dealers which wish to do business with the City to provide proof of capitalization to meet the City's needs, and agree to abide by the conditions set forth in this Investment Policy. All broker/dealers who want to become qualified bidders for investment transactions must have offices in the State of California and provide a current audited financial statement and complete the appropriate City Broker Dealer Questionnaire and Certification. The Treasurer will maintain a list of approved security broker/dealers selected by credit worthiness who are authorized to provide investment services to the City. Rev: 9/2000 3 The City shall at least annually send a copy of the current investment policy to authorized broker/dealers approved to do business with the City. Confirmation ofreceipt ofthis policy shall be considered evidence that the broker/dealer has read and understands the City's investment policy and will recommend and execute only transactions suitable for and in compliance with the City's investment policy. AUTHORIZED INVESTMENTS The City is authorized by California Government Code Section 53600, el. seq. to invest in specific types of securities. The City has further limited the types of securities in which it may invest. Any security not listed is not a valid investment for the City. The concise list ofapproved securities is as follows: MAXIMUM INVESTMENTS/DEPOSITS PERCENTAGES MATURITY (See Government Code Section 53601) Securities of the U.S. Government, or its agencies Unlimited 5 years* Certificates of Deposit (or Time Deposits) Unlimited 5 years* (placed with commercial banks and/or savings and loan companies) Negotiable Certificates of Deposit 30% 5 years* Banker's Acceptances 40% 270 days Commercial Paper 30% 180 days (~nvestmentsinC~mmercia~Papermustbe~n~ywithc~rp~rati~nswithatleast$5~~mi~li~ninassets. Must be of "prime" quality of the highest rating or of the highest letter and numerical rating as provided for by Moody's Investment Service Inc. or Standard & Poor's Corporation. Short term rating of at least 'A' or 'A I/P I ' and a long-term rating of M ' is required) Local Agency Investment Fund (State Pool) Demand Deposits 30 MM** n/a Deposit of Funds (See Government Code n/a Section 53630 - Ref. C) Repurchase Agreements (Repos) 20% 1 year The market value of the securities that underlay the repurchase agreement must be valued at 102% or greater of the funds borrowed against the securities and the value must be adjusted no less than quarterly. An executed Master Repurchase Agreement must be on ~le: * Maxim um term unless expressly authorized by Governing Body and within theprescribed timefi'amefor said approval. * *Limit set by L.A.I.F Governing Board, not Government Code. Rev: 9/2000 4 INVESTMENT POOLS The Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) is a voluntary investment alternative for California's local governments and special districts authorized by the California Government Code. LAIF is managed by the State Treasurer's Office with oversight by the Local Agency Investment Advisory Board. The City's participation in LAIF was approved by City Council with other authorized investments on July 1997. It is a permitted investment with the knowledge that the fund may invest in some vehicles allowed by statute but not otherwise authorized under the City's authorized investments. All securities in LAIF are purchased under the authority of Governn~ent Code Sections 16430 and 16480. All investments are purchased at market, and market valuation is conducted monthly. SAFEKEEPING OF SECURITIES Securities purchased from broker/dealers shall be held by third party bank or other designated third party trust department acting as agent for the City under the terms of a custody agreement executed by the bank and City. All securities will be received and delivered using standard delivery-versus- payment (DVP) procedures. Certificate of Deposit securities are held in the City's vault. No outside broker/dealer or advisor may have access to City funds, accounts or investments, and any transfer of funds to or through an outside broker/dealer must be approved by the City Treasurer/Deputy Treasurer. The City strives to maintain the level of investment of all funds as near 100% as possible, through daily and projected cash flow determinations. Idle cash management and investment transactions are the responsibility of the City Treasurer. DIVERSIFICATION The City will diversify its investments by security type, issuers, and maturities. The purpose of diversifying is to reduce overall portfolio risks while attaining an average market rate of retum; therefore, it needs to be conceptualized in terms of maturity, instrument types and issuer. Rev.. 9/2000 5 INDEPENDENT REVIEW Outside, independent auditors are required to perform an annual review of the City's Investment Policy, process, and internal controls. The review process is performed as part of the City' s annual external audit. REPORTING Pursuant to Section 53464 (b) of the Government Code, the Treasurer shall render a quarterly report to the City Council and City Manager, containing detailed information on all securities, investments, and moneys of the City. The report must be submitted within 30 days following the end of the quarter covered by the report. This report shall include the following: · The type of investment, name of the issuer, date of maturity, par and dollar amount invested in all securities. · The weighted average maturity of the investments. · Any funds, investments, or programs including loans that are under the management of contracted parties. · The current market value and source of the valuation. · A description of the compliance with the Statement of Investment Policy. · A statement of the City's ability to meet its pooled expenditure requirements for the next six months or provide an explanation as to why sufficient money shall, or may not be available. · The City Treasurer shall report whatever additional information or data may be required by the City Council. The City Council may elect to require the report to be made monthly instead of quarterly. Rev: 9/2000 6 7 The City Treasurer shall be responsible for reviewing and modifying investment guidelines as conditions warrant and is required to submit same for re-approval to the City Council annually. However, the City Treasurer may, at any time, further restrict the items approved for purchase as deemed appropriate. The basic premise underlying the City's investment philosophy is, and will continue to be, to ensure that money is always safe and available when needed. · FrB'iTst Date City of Rancho Cucamonga I.'UtD~tlN~SANDIqTREASUR}qhVVPOOO. doc Rev.'9/2000 7 GLOSSARY ACCRUED INTEREST: The accrued BUYER'S MARKET: A market where interest accumulated on a security since supply is greater than demand, giving the issue date or the last coupon buyers an advantage in purchase price payment. The buyer of the security pays and terms. the market price plus accrued interest. CALLABLES-N/C: Securities that the AGENCIES: Federal agency securities. issuer has the right to redeem prior to maturity. ASFdOFFER: The price at which an owner offers to sell. CASH SETTLEMENTS: Today. BANKERS' ACCEPTANCE (BA): A CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT (CD): draft or bill or exchange accepted by a A time deposit with a specific maturity bank or trust company. The accepting evidenced by a certificate. Large institution guarantees payment of the denomination CD's are typically bill, as well as, the issuer. negotiable. BASIS POINT: 1/100 of 1%. CMT: Constant Maturity Treasury. BID: The price offered by a buyer of COLLATERAL: Securities, evidence securities. (When you are selling of deposit or other property which a securities, you ask for a bid). See Offer. borrower pledges to secure repayment of a loan. Also refers to securities pledged BEAR MARKET: A period of by a bank to secure deposits of public generally pessimistic attitudes and monies. declining market prices. COMMERCIAL PAPER: Short-term, BOOK VALUE: The amount at which a unsecured, negotiable promissory notes security is carried on the books of the issued by businesses. holder or issuer. COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL BOND EQUIVALENT YIELD: The FINANCIAL REPORT (CAFR): The basis on which yields on notes and official annual report for the bonds are quoted. .It includes five combined statements for each individual fund and account BROKER: A broker brings buyers and group prepared in conformity with sellers together for a commission. Govemment Accounting Accepted Practices (GAAP). It also includes BULL MARKET: A period of supporting schedules necessary to generally optimistic attitudes and demonstrate compliance with finance increasing market prices. related legal and contractual provisions, extensive introductory material, and a detailed Statistical Section. City Of Rancho Cucamonga COUPON: (a) The annual rate of DISCOUNT: The difference between interest that a bond's issuer promises to the cost price of a security and its pay the bondholder on the bond's face maturity when quoted at lower than face value. (b) A certificate attached to a value. A security selling below original bond evidencing interest due on a offering price shortly after sale is payment date. considered to be at a discount. COVER: Spread between the winning DISCOUNT SECURITIES: Non- bid (or offer) and the next highest bid (or interest bearing money market offer). instruments that are issued at discount and redeemed at maturity for full face CREDIT RISK: Credit of the value, e.g.U.S. Treasury Bills. underlying security. CUSIP: Committee of Uniform Securities Identification DIVERSIFICATION: Dividing Procedures. investment funds among a variety of securities offering independent returns. DEALER: A dealer, as opposed to a broker, acts as a principal in all EASE: To assist the economy in transactions, buying and selling for his growing faster, Fed supplies more credit, own account or inventory. lowering reserve requirements or discount rates. DEBENTURE: A bond secured only by the general credit of the issuer. EXTENSION TRADES: Selling short term, buying further out in the yield DELIVERY VERSUS PAYMENT: curve. (Usually affected in a bull There are two methods of delivery of market). securities: delivery versus payment and delivery versus receipt. Delivery versus FACE VALUE: The principal amount payment is delivery of securities with an owed on a debt instrument. It is the exchange of money for the securities. amount on which interest is computed Delivery versus receipt is delivery of and represents the amount that the issuer securities with an exchange of signed promises to pay at maturity. receipt for the securities. FEDERAL CREDIT AGENCIES: DERIVATIVES: Financial products Agencies of the Federal government set that are dependent for their value on (or up to supply credit to various classes of "derived" from) an underlying financial institutions and individuals, e.g., S & L's instrument, a commodity, or an index small business firms, students, farmers, representing values of groups of such farm cooperatives, and exports. instruments or assets. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION (FDIC): A federal agency that insures bank deposits, currently up to $100,000 per deposit. City Of Rancho Cucamonga FEDERAL FUNDS RATE: The rate FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM: of interest at which Fed funds are traded. The central bank of the United States This rate is currently pegged by the created by Congress and consisting of a Federal Reserve through open-market seven member Board of Govemors in operations. Washington, D.C., 12 regional banks and about 5,700 commercial banks that FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS are members of the system. (FHLB): Government sponsored wholesale banks (currently 12 regional FEDERAL OPEN MARKET banks), which lend funds and provide COMMITTEE (FOMC): Consists of correspondent banking services to seven members of the Federal Reserve member commercial banks, thrift Board and five of the twelve Federal institutions, credit unions and insurance Reserve Bank Presidents. The President companies. The mission of the FHLB is of the New York Federal Reserve Bank to liquefy the housing related assets of is a permanent member, while the other its members who must purchase stock in Presidents serve on a rotating basis. The their districtBank. Committee periodically meets to set Federal Reserve guidelines regarding FEDERAL NATIONAL purchases and sales of Government MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION Securities in the open market as a means (FNMA or Fannie Mae): of influencing the volume of bank credit FNMA, like GNMA was chartered and money. under the Federal National Mortgage Association Act in 1938. FNMA is a FRN: Floating Rate Note. federal corporation working under the auspices of the Department of Housing FULL FAITH AND CREDIT: The and Urban Development (HUD). It .is unconditional guarantee of the United the largest single provider of residential States Government backing a debt for mortgage funds in the United States. repayment. Fannie Mae, is a private stockholder- owned corporation. The corporation's GOVERNMENT NATIONAL purchases include a variety of adjustable MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION mortgages and second loans, in addition (GNMA or Ginnie Mae)' Securities to fixed-rate mortgages. FNMA's influencing the volume of bank credit securities are also highly liquid and are guaranteed by GNMA and issued by widely accepted. FNMA assumes and savings and loan associations, and other guarantees that all security holders will institutions. Security holder is protected receive timely payment of principal and by full faith and credit of the U.S. interest. Government. Ginnie Mae securities are backed by the FHA, VA, or FMHM mortgages. The term "passthroughs" is often used to describe Ginnie Maes. INTEREST RATE RISK: The risk that rising interest rates will cause bond prices to fall. City Of Rancho Cucamonga /,// INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO: A MASTER REPURCHASE collection of securities held by a bank, AGREEMENT: individual, institution or government A written contract covering all future agency for investment purposes. transactions between the parties to repurchase reverse repurchase INVESTOR: A person who purchases agreements that establishes each party's securities with the intention of holding rights in the transactions. A master them to make a profit. agreement will often specify, among other things, the right of the buyer- ISSUE: A group of identical securities lender to liquidate the underlying or the marketing and selling of such securities in the event of default by the securities. seller-borrower. ISSUE PRICE: The price at which a MATURITY: The date upon which the new issue of securities is put on the principal or stated value of an market. investment becomes due and payable. LIQUIDITY: A liquid asset is one that MONEY MARKET can be converted easily and rapidly into INSTRUMENTS: Private and cash without a substantial loss of value. government obligations of one year or less (flexible in some arenas; under five LOCAL GOVERNMENT years would still be considered a money INVESTMENT POOL (LGIP): The market). aggregate of all funds from political subdivisions that are placed in the MTN: Medium TermNote. custody of the State Treasurer for investment and reinvestment. NEW ISSUE: The first offering of a security. LOCAL: Refers to the ability to sell securities one owns. NONCALLABLE: Security that does not contain a call provision. LIBID: London Interbank bid rate. OFFER: The price asked by a seller of LIBOR: London Interbank offered rate. securities. (When you are buying securities you ask for an offer). See MARKET VALUE: The price at which Asked and Bid. a security is trading and could presumably be purchased or sold. MARK TO MARKET: Current value of securities at today' s market price. MARKET RISK: The risk that the security will be difficult to sell. City Of Rancho Cucamonga OPEN MARKET OPERATIONS: PAR VALUE: The stated or face value Federal Reserve activity, Fed entering of a security expressed as a specific the market place to initiate repos, dollar amount marked on the face of the reverses, bill or coupon pass. Under the security; the amount of money due at Federal Reserve Act., Fed uses maturity not to be confused with market purchases and sales of Govt. & Fed value. Agency securities to add to or subtract from commercial bank reserves. Goals PAYDOWN: A net reduction in debt are to sustain economic growth, high that occurs when the amount of a new employment and reasonable price issue is less than the maturing issue. stability. PREMIUM: The amount by which the OPTION: The right to trade a security price paid for a security exceeds the par during a certain period of time. value. Also, the amount that must be paid over the par value to call an issue ORIGINAL ISSUE DISCOUNT/OlD: before maturity. Security priced at a discount at time of issuance. PRICE RISK: Volatility. OVERBOUGHT: Refers to the price PRIMARY DEALER: A group of level of a security or market, which has govemment securities dealers who undergone a sharp rise due to vigorous submit daily reports of market activity buying. and positions and monthly financial statements to the Federal Reserve Bank OVERSOLD: Refers to the price level of New York and are subject to its of a security or market, which has informal oversight. Primary dealers undergone a sharp fall due to selling. include Securities and Exchange These conditions indicate that Commission (SEC)-registered securities buying/selling may have left prices broker-dealers, banks, and a few temporarily too high/low, given all other unregulated firms. market conditions. PRIMARY MARKET: The demand PAPER GAIN OR LOSS: Term used for first issues of securities. for unrealized gain or loss on securities being held in a portfolio based on PRUDENT PERSON RULE: An comparison of current market quotes and investment standard. In some states the their original cost. This situation exists law requires that a fiduciary, such as a as long as the security is held while there trustee, may invest money only in a list is a difference between market value and of securities selected by the custody the purchase price. state--the so-called legal list. In other states the trustee may invest in a security if it is one, which would be bought by a prudent person of discretion and intelligence who is seeking a masonable income and preservation of capital. City Of Rancho Cucamonga QUALIFIED PUBLIC ROLL OVER: Reinvesting funds DEPOSITORIES: A financial received from a mature security in a new institution which does not claim issue of the same or similar security. exemption from the payment of any sales or compensating use or ad valorem SAFEKEEPING: A service banks taxes under the laws of this state, which offer to customers for a fee, where has segregated for the benefit of the securities are held in the bank's vaults commission eligible collateral having a for protection. value of not less than its maximum liability and which has been approved by SALLIE MAE: Trade name for the the Public Deposit Protection Student Loan Marketing Association. Commission to hold public deposits. SECONDARY MARKET: 1) A market RALLY: A brisk rise or recovery in the for the repurchase and resale of price of a security orthe market. outstanding issues following the initial distribution. 2) The purchase or sale of RATE OF RETURN: The yield securities in a special offering or through obtainable on a security based on its a means other than the regular channel purchase price or its current market of trading. price. This may be the amortized yield to maturity on a bond; the current SECURITIES & EXCHANGE income return. COMMISSION: Agency created by Congress to protect investors in RATING: The designation used by securities transactions by administering investor's services to rate the quality of a securities legislation. security's creditworthiness. SEC RULE 153C-1: See Uniform Net REGULAR: Next business day. Capital Rule. REPURCHASE AGREEMENT: SHORT/SELL SHORT: Sale of Repo - a holder of securities to an securities without ownership. investor with an agreement to repurchase them at a fixed price on a fixed date. SKIP DAY: Next business day after The security "buyer" in effect lends the tomorrow. "seller" money for the period of the agreement, and the terms are structured SPREAD: Difference between the bid to compensate him for this. When the and the ask, or offer. FED does R.P., it is lending money, thus increasing bank reserves. RICH/EXPENSIVE TO THE YIELD CURVE: An expression applied to a security price when current market quotes appear to be in comparison with past price records of securities or current prices of comparable securities. City Of Rancho Cucamonga STRUCTURED NOTES: Notes issued UNIFORM NET CAPITAL RULE: by Government Sponsored Enterprises Securities and Exchange Commission (FHLB, FNMA, SLMA, etc.) and requirement that member firms as well Corporations which have imbedded as nonmember broker-dealers in options (e.g., call features, derivative- securities maintain a maximum ratio of based returns) into their debt structure. indebtedness to liquid capital of 15 to 1; Their market performance is impacted also called net capital rule and net by the fluctuation of interest rates, the capital ratio. Indebtedness covers all volatility of the imbedded options and money owed to a firm, including margin shifts in the shape of the yield curve. loans and commitments to purchase securities, one reason new public issues SUPPORT: A price level at which a are spread among members of security tends to stop falling because underwriting syndicates. Liquid capital there is more demand than supply. includes cash and assets easily converted into cash. TIGHTEN: If the economy is growing too fast, and inflation is increasing, FED VALUE OF 1/32 PER MILLION: withdraws money from the banking $312.50 system,' by raising reserves or the discount rate. Ultimately, putting the WHEN ISSUED BASIS-WIB-WI: A brakes on economic growth. term applied to securities that are traded before they are actually issued, with the TREASURY BILLS: A non-interest stipulation that transactions are null and bearing discount security issued by the void if securities are not issued. U.S. Treasury to finance the national debt. Most bills are issued to mature in YIELD: The annual rate of return on an three months, six months, or one year. investment expressed as a percentage of the investment. Income yield is obtained TREASURY BOND: Long-term by dividing the current dollar income by coupon bearing U.S. Treasury securities the current market price for the security. issued as direct obligation of the U.S. Government having initial maturities of YIELD CURVE: Yield calculations of more than 10years. various maturities at a given time to observe spread differences. TREASURY NOTES: Medium-term coupon-bearing U.S. Treasury securities · YIELD TO MATURITY/NET issued as direct obligations of the U.S. YIELD: The current income yield Government and having initial maturities minus any premium above par, or plus from two to 10 years. any discount from par in the purchase price with the adjustment spread over the period from date of purchase to maturity. City Of Rancho Cucamonga / ,-/..r