Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2021-02-10 Agenda Packet Historic Preservation Commission and Planning Commission Agenda February 10, 2021 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 7:00 p.m. PURSUANT TO GOVERNOR GAVIN NEWSOM’S EXECUTIVE ORDER N-29-20 THIS MEETING WILL BE HELD AS A TELECONFERENCE MEETING In response to the Governor's Executive Orders, the San Bernardino County Department of Public Health requirements, and to ensure the health and safety of our residents by limiting contact that could spread the COVID– 19 virus, there will be no members of the public in attendance at the Planning Commission Meetings. Members of the Planning Commission and staff will participate in this meeting via teleconference. In place of in-person attendance, members of the public can observe and offer comment at this meeting via Zoom: VIEW MEETING VIA ZOOM APP OR ZOOM.COM AT: zoom.us/join using Webinar ID: 939 2286 8339 -or- YOU CAN DIAL-IN USING YOUR PHONE UNITED STATES: + 1 (669) 900-6833 Access Code: 939 2286 8339 A. Call to Order and Pledge of Allegiance B. Public Communications This is the time and place for the general public to address the Commission on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. The Commission may not discuss any issue not included on the Agenda but set the matter for a subsequent meeting. C. Consent Calendar C1. Consideration to adopt Regular Meeting Minutes of January 27, 2021. D. Public Hearings D1. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM20301 (LOCATED AT 11061 AND 11031 JERSEY BOULEVARD) – DIAMONDBACK LAND SURVEYING - A request to subdivide an existing 7.97-acre lot containing two industrial buildings into two lots within the Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial (MI/HI) District; APN: 0209-143-19. This item is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City’s CEQA guidelines under CEQA Section 15315 – Minor Land Divisions. HPC/PC Agenda – February 10, 2021 Page 2 of 3 If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at (909) 477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. D2. DESIGN REVIEW DRC2019-00371 (LOCATED ON A VACANT PARCEL ADDRESSED 8281 UTICA AVENUE IN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK) – BLUE ENGINEERING & CONSULTING, INC. - A request for site plan and architectural review of an industrial building totaling 13,116 square feet on 0.72 acres of land located on a vacant parcel addressed 8281 Utica Avenue in the Industrial Park (IP) District; APN: 0208-062-10. This item is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City’s CEQA guidelines under CEQA Section 15332 – In-Fill Development Projects. E. General Business E1. RENEW APPOINTMENT TO PUBLIC ARTS COMMITTEE TO ALIGN WITH THE OFFICIAL TERM FOR THIS COMMITTEE. F. Director Announcements G. Commission Announcements H. Workshop - None I. Adjournment TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. For each of the items listed under “PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS”, the public will be provided an opportunity to speak. To address the Planning Commission via Zoom App, click the “Raise Hand” button when the item you wish to comment on is being discussed. On Zoom via phone, you can also raise your hand by pressing star *, then 9 when the item you wish to comment on is being discussed. Comments will be limited to 5 minutes per individual. If a large number of individuals wish to speak on an item, the Chairman may limit the time to 3 minutes in order to provide an opportunity for more people to be heard. Speakers will be alerted when their time is up, and no further comments will be permitted. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under “PUBLIC COMMENTS.” As an alternative to participating in the meeting, you may submit comments in writing to Elizabeth.Thornhill@cityofrc.us by 12:00pm on the date of the meeting. Written comments will be distributed to the Commissioners and included in the record. HPC/PC Agenda – February 10, 2021 Page 3 of 3 AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are available at www.CityofRC.us. APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission’s decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk’s Office and must be accompanied by a fee of $3,206 for all decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). Please turn off all cell phones while the meeting is in session. I, Elizabeth Thornhill, Executive Assistant of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on Thursday, February 4, 2021, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. Historic Preservation Commission and Planning Commission Agenda January 27, 2021 MINUTES Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 7:00 p.m. The meeting of the Historic Presentation Commission and Planning Commission was held on January 27, 2021. The meeting was called to order by Chairman Guglielmo at 7:03pm. Planning Commission present: Chairman Guglielmo, Vice Chair Oaxaca, Commissioner Dopp, Commissioner Morales, Commissioner Williams. Staff Present: Darrelle Field, City Attorney; Anne McIntosh, Planning Director; Matt Burris, Deputy City Manager; Jennifer Nakamura, Analyst II; Dat Tran, Assistant Planner; David Eoff, Sr. Planner; Elizabeth Thornhill, Executive Assistant; Jason Welday, Engineering Director; Mike Smith, Principal Planner. B. Public Communications Chairman Guglielmo opened for public communications. Received one comment regarding trees the City planted and is concerned they will fall over due to the high winds and damage properties. Requesting to have them removed. Mike Smith, Principal Planner, provided his contact information to discuss further. Chairman Guglielmo hearing no other comments, closed communications. C. Consent Calendar C1. Consideration to adopt Regular Meeting Minutes of January 13, 2021 Motion by Vice Chair Oaxaca, second by Commissioner Morales. Motion carried 4-0 to adopt the minutes as presented. Commissioner Williams abstain. D. Public Hearings D1. DESIGN REVIEW MODIFICATION DRC2020-00482 – DR HORTON– A request for a design review modification to SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016- 00450, DRC2016-00451, DRC2016-00452, DRC2016-00508 by modifying the current conditions of approval with the removal of Condition #13 that places restrictions on the residential occupancy of the community. The project site is located at the southwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road – APN: 1090-695-90. Pursuant to the California Environment Quality Act (CEQA), a Mitigated Negative Declaration was adopted and approved in 2017 as part of the original project approval and was determined that the project would not have any significant impacts on the environment. The request to modify a condition of approval will not result in any significant impacts or additional impacts that 004 HPC/PC Minutes – January 27, 2021 Page 2 of 6 Draft weren’t previous addressed by the Mitigated Negative Declaration. Therefore, no further environmental review is required. David Eoff, Sr. Planner, presented Commissioners with a Staff Report and oral presentation (copy on file). He noted a modification to the current conditions of approval with the removal of Condition #13, that places restriction on the residential occupancy of the community. Vice Chair Oaxaca stated with the conditions as it stands now serves as a guarantee for the City that the project will be built out as it was approved. He said the condition connected everything together so when the project was done, we would have a complete development but removing this condition seems it will disconnect from the hotel portion of project from the rest of the development and his concern is are there any other guarantees it will ever be completed the way we expect it to be if that condition is removed. David Eoff answered there is no guarantee with this condition being removed because the hotel property is under a separate ownership. He said the hotel owner remains excited about the project, but we really do not have a guarantee. Anne McIntosh, Planning Director, mentioned there is an incentive because it’s entitled. She said because the project has already started construction that entitlement adds value to the property. Chairman Guglielmo asked what type of condition is the lot in currently. Are there any plans to beautify the parcel should it remain vacant for a length of time. David Eoff answered the lot is currently rough graded. There are separate requirements in place just from a code enforcement standpoint for maintaining vacant property. He said there is nothing specific to improve that site to accommodate the timeline while waiting on the hotel. Chairman Guglielmo opened the Public Hearing. Phil Burum, Applicant, said site is builder ready. **unintelligible** Megan Kay Whieldon, Applicant, stated the hotel issued a building permit to proceed with building that pad but due to COVID it is the reason why they did not proceed. She said they do have an active HOA on site at all times which helps with management of the area. Karen H., resident, state she understands the owners of the hotel, commercial and residential areas are separate and would like to know if they are all owned by a corporation. David Eoff answered no, they are all under separate ownership. With no more public comments. Chairman Guglielmo closed public hearing. Commissioner Dopp mentioned it is a project we would like to have seen done all at once. He does not have a problem to remove the request in the condition. He said for the record, he is disappointed it had to come to this. Commissioner Williams agrees with Dopp of being disappointed. Her concern is that the site will end up looking bad but believes the commercial company will keep up with the management of the property. She does not have a problem removing the condition. 005 HPC/PC Minutes – January 27, 2021 Page 3 of 6 Draft Commissioner Morales stated the hotel is making all reasonable efforts to get financing. He said to approve and recommend is the right thing to do considering all the circumstances. Vice Chair Oaxaca asked the property owner, where the hotel is planned to make sure as the other property advance and new residents move-in they keep the parcel aligned with all that is going on around them. He said he is comfortable with staff’s recommendation to remove the condition. Chairman Guglielmo stated it is going to be a huge asset for the City. He believes the HOA will keep an eye on things and hope the owner of hotel will be a good neighbor and shortly we will be able to utilize the hotel. Motion by Commissioner Dopp, second by Commissioner Morales. Motion carried 5-0 vote to adopt Resolutions 21-8, with the modified condition. D2. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT20295 – COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT – A review of a proposed subdivision of a property of about 1,166 acres into twelve (12) lots for sale and three (3) lettered lots to be retained by the project proponent, located within the Etiwanda Heights Neighborhood and Conservation Plan, located north of Banyan Street, east of Milliken Avenue, and west of Day Creek Boulevard – APNs: 0201-191-27; 0201-272-15, -16, -17, and -18; 0225-091-05 and -06; 0225-092-01; 1074-351-01, -04, -05, and -06; 1087-071-01, -02, -03, -04, -05, -06, -07, -08, -09, -10, -11, -12, -13, 14, 18, -19, and -20. Pursuant to the California Environment Quality Act (CEQA), the City certified and Environmental Impact Report (EIR) on October 2, 2019 in connection with the City’s approval of Environmental Impact Report and General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00749, Etiwanda North Specific Plan Amendment DRC2015-00750, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00752, Etiwanda Heights Neighborhood and Conservation Plan (EHNCP) Specific Plan DRC2015-00751, Annexation DRC2015-00732, and Development Code Amendment DRC2019-00459. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project. Jason Welday, Engineering Director, presented Commissioners with a Staff Report and oral presentation (copy on file). Noted two minor things for the record: 1) Notices that were mailed reference the 12 lots that would be for sale however, the three letter lots were not included in the notice. Minor omission and it does not affect the nature of the subdivision or lots. 2) Copy of the Tentative map provided with Staff Report, the ownership was listed as County of San Bernardino and it should have been San Bernardino Flood Control District. The written Staff Report is correct, and we have updated Cities copy that is on file to reflect that change. Commissioner Oaxaca asked regarding the “Location” slide of presentation, the area was outlined in red. It encompassed all the neighborhood area except for a section in the southeast corner. He asked what the fate for that portion of the neighborhood area is and will there be a separate action considered for that section. Jason Welday explained there is a small amount of residential in that area under Etiwanda Heights Plan and there is also park space and other uses. The County Flood Control District’s ownership is mostly the flood control area and area that is shown in the Plan as park area, however there is a small amount of planned residential areas that are owned by the District. These areas would still need to be developed in the plan as it was approved by City Council. 006 HPC/PC Minutes – January 27, 2021 Page 4 of 6 Draft Vice Chair Oaxaca asked regarding Page 8 the sizes of different parcels and noticed Lot 8 - Acreage 185, the size is different from what shows on Exhibit B with respect to an area of 3 acres. There is inconsistency and wanted to confirm if it should be listed on the Tentative Map as 3 acres. Jason Welday responded it is a typo and should be listed as 3 acres for Lot 8. Commissioner Williams asked who will maintain and take care of the mitigation and make sure it’s preserved in proper form. Jason Welday answered the requirements for the mitigation will be set up as part of the permitting process. He said it would have to go to an organization that’s approved by the resource agencies to manage the plan and was not sure if it will be County Flood. His understanding was that it will be a separate entity. Commissioner Williams asked if big parcels could be broken down to small parcels and sold off to different developers. Jason Welday replied they would be subdivided further. The purpose of this map is more for phasing of the development. There is a lot of infrastructure that is required for this development. He said that further subdivisions would still have to be consistent with the Etiwanda Heights Plan. Commissioner Morales asked if the west set of powerlines are included in Lot A or are they outside of it running through Lots 4 and 6 and if they are, will it be planned out in the subdivision when it gets down to a more detailed level. He asked how that will work and where does it line up in the map. Jason Welday answered there are two corridors on the east side that shows as Lot A, which is the Flood Control District’s property, and east of that is the Edison corridor. There is an easement for Edison over a portion what is being shown as Lot A as well as what Edison owns east of that. That would all be taken into account. The specific plan kept those areas as corridors. They butt up to it but do not cross over. Returning to Commissioner Oaxaca’s question about Lot 8, Jason Welday confirmed that there is a missing line in the table on the Tentative Map. This will be corrected on the final version for the record. Chairman Guglielmo opened the Public Hearing. Terry Thompson, Director of Real Estate Services on behalf of the County Flood Control District. He mentioned this tentative tract map is in support of the City’s specific plan. He stated their intention is not to sell to a number of developers but sell it to one master developer who will handle all the matters including conservation areas. Commissioner Dopp asked to confirm that the County does not have one specific buyer in mind but rather, that it be put up for auction for multiple developers to bid on. Terry Thompson replied it is a requirement to put it up for auction and an item is now being prepared for it to go in front of their board for approval and then it will go through the process to go to auction. Chairman Guglielmo asked what is the estimated timeline. Terry Thompson answered they anticipate it would go to auction the first part of June this year. 007 HPC/PC Minutes – January 27, 2021 Page 5 of 6 Draft Lee Sun, resident, asked a question regarding the lots if there is a limit of how many dwelling units per acre and will that be a requirement for the developer. He also asked if there will be a connection for Wilson. Jason Welday answered there will be a connection for Wilson between Milliken and Day Creek to properly circulate traffic. Regarding the question on zoning and dwelling per acre, the Etiwanda Height Plan outlined those details and that one of the Planners may be able to assist with more details. Anne McIntosh, Planning Director, placed a link of the website in the Chat box. She said all the information about the development plan and roads are in the actual planning documents and can be referred to on our website. Clay Sampson, resident of Haven View Estates, expressed his concerns of the development blocking his view and mentioned the value of homes will go down. Jason Welday mentioned a lot of the detail is in the specific plan and can see where it will line up in the areas. Anne McIntosh clarified the item being presented tonight and if needed can follow up with people separately. She explained the proposed developments do not have any bearing on how this map is subdivided and are not talking about the developments themselves tonight. She expressed we do want to talk to the public if there are questions on developments in the future. Mike Smith, Principal Planner, provided his contact information to Mr. Sampson to discuss further. Victor Fuentes, resident of Haven View Estates, asked if Parcel 8 and Parcel 10 would be sold to a developer or be part of the wilderness plan. He expressed his concern the development will block his view and the value of his property. Jason Welday answered Parcel 10 is part of the conservation area. Parcel 8 has the potential to be conservation or flood control depending on the ultimate needs of the flood control infrastructure in that area. With no more public comments. Chairman Guglielmo closed public hearing. Commissioner Morales mentioned the importance of Lot 10 and 11 being set aside for the conservation area buffer. He expressed his excitement for Etiwanda Heights, and this is the first step of the development of the master plan community. Commissioner Dopp stated it is a straightforward process and he approves this project. Commissioner Williams concurs and is also excited to move on with this project. Vice Chair Oaxaca concurs and has no issues. Chairman Guglielmo agrees and recommends for the public to refer to the planning documents for further clarification, especially the specific plan. It is detailed and specific. He does not see any issues with moving this project forward. Motion by Vice Chair Oaxaca, second by Commissioner Morales. Motion carried, 5-0 vote to Adopt resolutions #21-6. 008 HPC/PC Minutes – January 27, 2021 Page 6 of 6 Draft D3. MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT DRC2021-00003 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend Title 17 (Development Code) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to defer payment of public art in lieu fee from building permit issuance to final inspection. This item is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City’s CEQA guidelines under CEQA Section 15061(b)(3). This item will be forwarded to City Council for final action. Jennifer Nakamura, Management Analyst, presented Commissioners with a Staff Report and oral presentation (copy on file). Chairman Guglielmo opened the public hearing and hearing no comments, closed public hearing. All Commissioners concurred and are in favor of moving it forward to Council. Motion by Commissioner Williams, second by Commissioner Morales. Motion carried, 5-0 vote to Adopt resolutions #21-7. E. General Business - None F. Director Announcements – Anne McIntosh, Planning Director, reminded the Commissioners there will be items on the upcoming February 10th PC Agenda. G. Commission Announcements - None H. Workshop – None I. Adjournment Motion by Vice Chair Oaxaca, second by Commissioner Williams to adjourn the meeting, motion carried unanimously, 5-0 vote. Meeting was adjourned at 8:41pm. Respectfully submitted, ________________________ Elizabeth Thornhill Executive Assistant, Planning Department Approved: 009 SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM20301 – DIAMONDBACK LAND SURVEYING - A request to subdivide an existing 7.97-acre lot containing two industrial buildings into two smaller lots within the Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial (MI/HI) District, located at 11061 and 11031 Jersey Boulevard; APN: 0209-143-19. This item is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City’s CEQA guidelines under CEQA Section 15315 – Minor Land Divisions. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20301 through adoption of the attached Resolution with Conditions of Approval. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: The applicant is proposing to subdivide a 7.97-acre parcel developed with two existing industrial buildings into two smaller parcels, with each parcel containing one building (see Exhibits A and B). The parcels will be 3.29 acres and 4.68 acres respectively. Access to the site is taken from White Oak Avenue to the west and Jersey Boulevard to the east. The existing land uses, General Plan, and zoning designations for the project site and surrounding properties are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Industrial/Warehouse Heavy Industrial Minimum Impact/Heavy Industrial (MI/HI) District North Industrial/Warehouse Heavy Industrial Minimum Impact/Heavy Industrial (MI/HI) District South Parking Lot Heavy Industrial Minimum Impact/Heavy Industrial (MI/HI) District East Industrial/Warehouse Heavy Industrial Minimum Impact/Heavy Industrial (MI/HI) District West Industrial/Warehouse Heavy Industrial Minimum Impact/Heavy Industrial (MI/HI) District DATE: February 10, 2021 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Planning Director INITIATED BY: Vincent Acuna, Associate Planner 010 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM20301– DIAMONDBACK LAND SURVEYING February 10, 2021 Page 2 ANALYSIS: A. General: The current property owner is proposing to subdivide the subject property in order to allow for separate ownership of the two parcels and buildings. The two proposed parcels will meet all pertinent standards for the Minimum Impact/Heavy Industrial (MI/HI) District in the Development Code, and the subdivision complies with the Subdivision Map Act. Aside from the subdivision, no physical changes are being proposed to the site or the two industrial/warehouse buildings. The project is conditioned to require the applicant to provide evidence of the recordation of a reciprocal access and maintenance agreement between all parcels in the tract map. This ensures that access and maintenance of all parking areas will remain shared between the two parcels. Given that there is no change to the existing tenants or number of parking spaces on any of the two buildings, no parking or other impacts are anticipated. Each building will continue to maintain an adequate number of parking spaces, as demonstrated by the parking exhibit provided by the applicant (Exhibit C). Additionally, the proposed subdivision will also maintain the minimum required setbacks, including the new interior side setbacks created by subdividing the parcel. B. Environmental Assessment: Planning staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City’s CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 15 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15315 – Minor Land Divisions, as the project involves the subdivision of a lot into two parcels where no physical changes occur. Staff finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. FISCAL IMPACT: The proposed subdivision is not expected to have any fiscal impact on the City. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: The proposed subdivision is designed to address the changing of ownership rights and responsibilities of the property. No long-term City Council goals are directly addressed with the proposed subdivision. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. No correspondence has been received in response to these notices. EXHIBITS: Exhibit A - Location Map Exhibit B - Project Plans Exhibit C - Parking Exhibits for 11061 and 11031 Jersey Boulevard Exhibit D - Draft Resolution 21-05 of Approval for Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20301 011 N CARTILLA AVE 19TH STHAMILTON STNExhibit A 012 JERSEY BOULEVARD RESERVEDRESERVEDRESERVEDRESERVEDRESERVEDRESERVEDRESERVEDRESERVEDRESERVEDRESERVEDRESERVEDRESERVED RESERVEDRESERVEDRESERVEDRESERVEDRESERVEDRESERVEDRESERVEDRESERVEDRESERVEDRESERVEDRESERVEDRESERVEDRESERVEDRESERVEDPARCEL 1 PARCEL 2 3.29+/- ACRES (GROSS) 2.65+/- ACRES (NET) 4.68+/- ACRES (GROSS) 4.27+/- ACRES (NET)LOT 1 M B 3 4 / 6 6 DPRESITGE COURTWHITE OAK AVENUEA. T. & S. F. RAILROAD D BENCHMARK BASIS OF BEARINGS 1 OF 1PREPARED BY: TRENT J. KEENAN Exp.3/31/2022 SURVEYOR:TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 20301 11031 AND 11061 JERSEY BOULEVARD CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA A.P.N. 0209-143-19 SHEET NUMBEREASEMENT TABLE OWNER/SUBDIVIDER SURVEYOR UTILITY PROVIDERS VESTING DEED LEGAL DESCRIPTION AREA OF PROPOSED PARCELS ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER LEGEND VICINITY MAP SITE Exhibit B 013 11061 JERSEY BLVD., RANCHO CUCAMONGA Parking Site Plan JERSEY BLVD 11061 Jersey Blvd 124 Spaces Total Includes 4 Handicaps Exhibit C 014 PARKING TABULATION, 11061 Jersey Blvd, Rancho Cucamonga, CA USE SQUARE FOOTAGE CODE REQUIREMENT SPACES REQUIRED Office 7,000 4 per 1,000 sf 28 Warehouse 71,812 1 per 1,000 sf for first 20,000 sf; 1 per 2,000 sf for the next 20,000 sf; and 1 per 4,000 sf for the remaining sf 38 Manufacturing 0 2 per 1000 sf 0 Research and Development 0 3 per 1000 sf 0 Total 78,812 66 TOTAL PARKING SPACES REQUIRED 66 TOTAL PARKING SPACES PROVIDED 124 015 11031 JERSEY BLVD., RANCHO CUCAMONGA Parking Site Plan JERSEY BLVD WHITE OAK AVE11031 Jersey Blvd 82 Spaces Total Includes 4 Handicaps 016 PARKING TABULATION, 11031 Jersey Blvd, Rancho Cucamonga, CA USE SQUARE FOOTAGE CODE REQUIREMENT SPACES REQUIRED Office 10,000 4 per 1,000 sf 40 Warehouse 42,000 1 per 1,000 sf for first 20,000 sf; 1 per 2,000 sf for the next 20,000 sf; and 1 per 4,000 sf for the remaining sf 31 Manufacturing 5,000 2 per 1000 sf 10 Research and Development NA 3 per 1000 sf 0 Total 57,000 81 TOTAL PARKING SPACES REQUIRED 81 TOTAL PARKING SPACES PROVIDED 82 017 RESOLUTION NO. 21-05 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM20301 TO SUBDIVIDE AN EXISTING 7.97-ACRE PARCEL CONTAINING TWO INDUSTRIAL/WAREHOUSE BUILDINGS INTO TWO PARCELS IN THE MINIMUM IMPACT/HEAVY INDUSTRIAL (MI/HI) DISTRICT, LOCATED AT 11061 AND 11031 JERSEY BOULEVARD; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF – APN: 0209-143-19 A.Recitals. 1. The applicant, Diamondback Land Surveying, filed an application for Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20301, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Parcel Map is referred to as "the application." 2. On February 10, 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the application. 3.All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B.Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1.This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2.Based upon the substantial evidence presented to the Planning Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on February 10, 2021, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a.The application applies to property located within the City; and b.The application applies to an existing 7.97-acre parcel containing two industrial/warehouse buildings located at 11061 and 11031 Jersey Boulevard in the Minimum Impact/Heavy Industrial (MI/HI) District; and c.The application proposes the subdivision of the 7.97-acre site into two parcels, measuring 3.29 and 4.68 acres respectively; and d.Each parcel will maintain an adequate number of parking spaces for all uses contained within its boundaries. A reciprocal access and maintenance agreement shall be established prior to the recordation of the Final Map; and e.The application proposes no physical changes to the site or the existing buildings. The project site will continue to meet or exceed all Development Code standards at the time of permit approval. Exhibit D 018 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.21-05 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM20301 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA February 10, 2021 Page 2 3.Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a.That the tentative parcel map is consistent with the General Plan and Development Code. The General Plan designates the project site as Industrial Park. The Development Code designates the project site as Minimum Impact/Heavy Industrial (MI/HI) District. The MI/HI designation permits a wide range of activities that include manufacturing and warehouse uses. The proposed project is for the subdivision of the site into two parcels. Aside from the change of ownership rights and responsibilities, no physical changes are being proposed to the site or the building. The existing industrial/warehouse uses on site are consistent with the Heavy Industrial land use as designated in the General Plan. b.The design or improvements of the tentative parcel map is consistent with the General Plan and Development Code. The project proposes no physical changes to the site or the building. All site improvements, including parking and landscaped areas, are designed to be consistent with the Heavy Industrial land use as designated in the General Plan and MI/HI District in the Development Code. c.The site is physically suitable for the proposed development. The project site is currently occupied by two industrial/warehouse buildings and designated by the General Plan and Development Code for industrial/warehouse use. No physical changes are being proposed to the site. The site will continue to operate as existing. d.The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat. The proposed project is only for the subdivision of the project site into two parcels. No building construction is proposed in conjunction with this tentative parcel map. No environmental impacts are expected. e. The tentative parcel map is not likely to cause serious public health problems. The proposed project is only for the subdivision of the project site into three parcels. No building construction is proposed in conjunction with this tentative parcel map. No health impacts are expected. f.The design of the tentative parcel will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. All existing public easements will be retained as existing and direct access to all easement areas from the public right-of-way will be maintained. Ownership rights pertaining to individual parcels that comprise the project site will not supersede existing easement rights for public access onto the site. 4.Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City’s local CEQA Guidelines, the Planning Commission finds that the project qualifies as a Class 15 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15315 – Minor Land Divisions, as the project involves the subdivision of an existing lot into two parcels where no physical changes occur. The Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. 5.Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth in 019 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.21-05 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM20301 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA February 10, 2021 Page 3 the Conditions of Approval, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 6.The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Tony Guglielmo, Chairman ATTEST: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary I, Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of February 2021, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: 020 Conditions of Approval Community Development Department Project #: SUBTPM20301 Project Name: EDR - Diamondback Land Surveying Location: 11061 JERSEY BLVD - 020914319-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval The applicant shall sign the Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval provided by the Planning Department. The signed Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval shall be returned to the Planning Department prior to the submittal of grading/construction plans for plan check, request for a business license, and/or commencement of the approved activity. 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the Engineering Services Department within 3 years from the date of the approval. 3. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 4. Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&Rs or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the parcel map or prior to the issuance of Building Permits, where no parcel map is involved. 1. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or noted on the parcel map. 2. The parcel map shall clearly delineate a 10-foot minimum building restriction on the neighboring lot adjoining the zero lot line wall and contain the following language: "I/We hereby dedicate to the City of Rancho Cucamonga the right to prohibit the construction of buildings (or other structures) within those areas designated on the map as building restriction areas." A maintenance agreement shall also be granted from each lot to the adjacent lot through the CC&Rs. 3. www.CityofRC.us Printed: 1/7/2021 021 Project #: SUBTPM20301 Project Name: EDR - Diamondback Land Surveying Location: 11061 JERSEY BLVD - 020914319-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval Reciprocal parking agreements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all common roads, drives, or parking areas shall be provided by CC & R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to, or concurrent with, the parcel map. 4. Vehicular access rights shall be dedicated to the City for the following streets, except for approved openings: White Oak Avenue and Jersey Blvd. 5. Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit Standard Conditions of Approval The CC&Rs document that has been amended to contain the language establishing the easements in favor of the Fire District needs to be signed, notarized, and recorded. Evidence of recording needs to be provided to the Fire District by way of uploading such evidence to this request/record through the Online Permit Center. 1. www.CityofRC.us Page 2 of 2Printed: 1/7/2021 022 DATE: February 10, 2021 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Planning Director INITIATED BY: Sean McPherson, AICP SUBJECT: DESIGN REVIEW DRC2019-00371 – BLUE ENGINEERING & CONSULTING, INC. - A request for site plan and architectural review of a commercial office building totaling 13,116 square feet on 0.72 acres of land located on a vacant parcel addressed 8281 Utica Avenue in the Industrial Park (IP) District; APN: 0208- 062-10. This item is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City’s CEQA guidelines under CEQA Section 15332 – In-Fill Development Projects. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Design Review DRC2019-00371 through the adoption of the attached Resolution with attached standard conditions of approval. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: A proposal to construct a new 13,116 square foot two-story office building on vacant land within the Industrial Park (IP) district. BACKGROUND: The project site consists of one vacant lot located within the Industrial Park (IP) District, on property addressed 8281 Utica Avenue (APN: 0208-062-10). The project site is undeveloped, void of trees and contains unvegetated areas and non-native grasses and shrubs. The site is surrounded in each direction by parcels developed with commercial office uses and is generally flat and at-grade with Utica Avenue. The project site’s street frontage along Utica Avenue is improved with curb and gutter, but not with sidewalks or streetlights. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Vacant Industrial Park Industrial Park (IP) District North Office Industrial Park Industrial Park (IP) District South Office Industrial Park Industrial Park (IP) District West Office Industrial Park Industrial Park (IP) District East Office Industrial Park Industrial Park (IP) District 023 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DESIGN REVIEW DRC2019-00371 – BLUE ENGINEERING & CONSULTING, INC. February 10, 2021 Page 2 PROJECT ANALYSIS: The applicant, Blue Engineering & Consulting, proposes to develop a 13,116 square foot two-story office building on 31,233 square feet (0.72 acres) of land located on a vacant parcel addressed 8281 Utica Avenue in the Industrial Park (IP) District. The applicant states that the proposed building will be used as an office building for professional services (i.e. lawyers, engineers, mortgage brokers, and architects), and is divisible into separate suites. The development is not intended to house medical offices. The north/northwest (front) elevation of the office building will face Utica Avenue. Vehicular access to the project will be from a shared driveway off Utica Avenue leading to an on-site parking lot located in between the street and the proposed building and which surrounds the building on the north, west and south. Additional access to the parking lot will be provided from an adjacent parcel via another shared access driveway to the south. The building proposes a contemporary vernacular theme that meets the City’s 360-degree architectural guidelines. The primary entrance to the building is surrounded by an angled aluminum storefront system projection which also protrudes from each facade of the building. The entrance is further accentuated by a two- story wood frame feature comprised of Stonewood architectural panels (ESR-4154). Other attractive elements include an aluminum canopy at the front entrance which is supported by pillars encased in Coronado Stone veneer (Coronado Honey ledge – Sioux Falls). Both the aluminum canopy and stone veneer continue through each facade of the building. The floorplan includes a lobby with an elevator and two conference rooms, plus offices and restrooms on the ground floor. A vestibule, two more conference rooms, and additional offices and restrooms are located on the second floor. Storage rooms and breakrooms are also located on each floor. The project complies with each of the related development standards for the Industrial Park (IP) District as shown in the table below: Development Standard Required Proposed Complies? Building Height Maximum 35 feet (at front setback) and 75 feet (1-foot increment from the setback line) 30 feet, 8 inches YES Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 40-60% 41.9% (13,116 / 31,233 square feet) YES Front Building Setback (Utica Avenue) 25 feet ~87 feet YES Average Depth of Landscape 25 feet 26.2 feet YES Parking Setback 15 feet (Utica Avenue) 19.64 YES Interior Side Yard Setback Min. 5 feet 37.2 (north property line); 56 feet (south property line) YES Rear Yard Setback Min. 0 feet 10 feet YES Open Space/Landscape Standards 15% 16.8% YES 024 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DESIGN REVIEW DRC2019-00371 – BLUE ENGINEERING & CONSULTING, INC. February 10, 2021 Page 3 The project complies with the City’s landscape standards. Site landscape coverage meets the minimum requirement of 15% and includes an overall depth of 25 feet along Utica Avenue. The landscaping palette includes a variety of trees, shrubs, and ground cover to help screen mechanical equipment and enhance the appearance of the building. Public frontage improvements along Utica Avenue will also be required to be completed, including a new parkway, sidewalk and streetlights. Parking: Pursuant to Development Code Section 17.64.050, Table 17.64.050-1, parking for offices is based on the ratio of 4 parking spaces for every 1,000 square feet. Development Code Section 17.64.050.A.6 further provides that for commercial, office and industrial zoned properties, certain areas within a building may be exempted from parking calculations. These areas include hallways 44 inches or less, electrical and mechanical rooms, elevator shafts, stairwells, bathroom and storage closets. Thus, while the gross floor area of the proposed project totals 13,116 square feet, approximately 2,196 square feet of the proposed project includes those areas listed above that are exempt from parking calculations. This translates into a parking requirement of 44 parking spaces for the project. The table below demonstrates that the project meets the minimum required number of parking spaces. Parking Ratio Required Parking Provided Parking Offices 4 per 1,000 square feet 44 spaces 44 spaces Public Art: The project is required to comply with the City’s public art ordinance pursuant to Development Code Section 17.124. Pursuant to Chapter 17.124, certain types of newly constructed development are required to provide art work with a value equal to or exceeding one dollar per square foot of the facility. In lieu of providing the art required, the applicant may also donate artwork to the City or pay an in-lieu fee into the City’s public art trust fund. A condition of approval is included within the Draft Resolution specifying the requirements for the artwork. Design Review Committee: The project was reviewed by the Design Review Committee (Oaxaca, Williams and Smith), on January 5, 2021 (Exhibit C). The Committee recommended that the project move forward as presented to the Planning Commission for final review and approval. CEQA DETERMINATION: The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City’s CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 32 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 – In-Fill Development Projects, as the project is a proposed development occurring within city limits on a project site less than five acres in size and is substantially surrounded by urban uses. The proposed office use is consistent with the intent of the Industrial Park designation in the General Plan and project meets all applicable development standards and zoning regulations of the Development Code. To demonstrate that the project qualified for the exemption, specific environmental studies were prepared to assess any potential impacts that the project might have on the environment. As a result of these studies, staff finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The studies prepared analyzed the following topics: 025 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DESIGN REVIEW DRC2019-00371 – BLUE ENGINEERING & CONSULTING, INC. February 10, 2021 Page 4 • Air Quality - Air Quality and Health Risk Significance Thresholds (Hana Resources, August 2020) – The analysis of potential impacts to air quality and greenhouse gases (GHG) determined that the project would not exceed the applicable Southern California Air Quality Management District’s threshold for air quality and greenhouse gas emissions, respectively, during construction or operational activity. • Biological Resources - Habitat Assessment (ELMT Consulting, October 2020) – The Survey determined that no special-status plant or wildlife species are known to occur in the general vicinity of the project site and are not expected to be impacted by the project. ELMT Consulting recommends that a condition of approval be added to the project to require a pre-construction clearance survey for nesting birds if construction were to occur between February 1 and August 31. • Noise - Noise and Vibration Impact Study (Hana Resources, April 2020) – The Noise and Vibration Study found that construction activity would increase in ambient temporary noise and vibration in the project area on an intermittent basis, but that this increase will be less than significant. Further, the Noise and Vibration Study found that the operation of the proposed project would also not generate any significant noise sources to the existing urban area. • Traffic - Traffic Impact Analysis (Scoping Agreement, Ganddini Group, Inc., April 2020) – A scoping agreement was prepared and reviewed by the Engineering Department which determined that the project will result in less than 50 peak hour trips. As such, no additional traffic analysis was required. • Water Quality - Conceptual Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) (Blue Engineering and Consulting, August 2020) – The WQMP was submitted and reviewed by the City’s grading engineer. The City’s grading engineer approved the conceptual design and will review the final design when grading plans are submitted. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing with a regular legal advertisement in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper on January 27, 2021, the property was posted on January 27, 2021, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius (34 property owners) of the project site on January 26, 2021. To date, no comments have been received regarding the project notifications. COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: By developing the subject vacant in-fill site with a high-quality, attractive office building, the subject project fulfills the City Council’s Core Value of “continuous improvement.” The proposed project will complement the surrounding existing office neighborhood and attract additional employment to the City, developing a vacant site with a new, attractive building which adds to the overall aesthetic quality of the community. EXHIBITS: Exhibit A - Vicinity Map and Aerial Photograph Exhibit B - Project Plans Exhibit C - Design Review Committee Comments (January 5, 2021) and Action Agenda Exhibit D - Draft Resolution 21-09 of Approval for DRC2019-00371 026 Vicinity Map and Aerial Photograph Subject Property 8281 Utica Avenue APN: 0208-062-10 Exhibit A 027 CLEAN AIR/VANPOOL/EVCLEAN AIR/VANPOOL/EVCLEAN AIR/VANPOOL/EVCITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA8281 UTICA AVE.RANCH CUCAMONGA, CA 91730PROPOSED OFFICE BUILDING5FeetSCALE 1" = 20'4020010Exhibit B028 5460 SFPROPOSED GROUNDFLOOR ARE A674 SFNON. PARK.161 SFNON. PARK.268 SFNON. PARK.3' - 8"3' - 8"5460 SFPROPOSED SECONDFLOOR674 SFNON. PARK.268 SFNON. PARK.152 SFNON. PARK.ScaleProject numberDateDrawn byChecked byThis document, and the ideas and designs incorporated herein, as an instrument of professional service, is the property of Everett Smith, and is not to be used in whole or in part, for any other project without the written authorization of Everett Smith/ ESDESIGNS. All Rights ReservedPREPARED BY:Email: everett@everettsmithdesigns.comRIVERSIDE COUNTY, CATEL:951-323-2187EEEEVVVVEEEERRRREEEETTTTTTTT SSSSMMMMIIIITTTTHHHH PROJECT:CLIENT NAME:PROJECT ADDRESS:REVISIONS:DDDD S DDDD EEEE SSSS IIII GGGG NNNN SSSSE201910/14/2020 2:01:22 PM1" = 20'-0"10/14/2020 2:01:22 PMZ:\Shared\Everett Smith Designs\___ES Design Jobs\20-2028 8281 UTICA AVE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA\20-2028 8281 UTICA AVE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA 10.14.rteA0COVER SHEET20-2028ML MORTGAGECORP.RMESNEW 2 STORY COMMERICALBUILDING8281 UTICA AVE,RANCHO CUCAMONGAAREA PLANNORTHSHEET INDEXA0COVER SHEETA0.1GENERAL NOTESA0.2GENERAL NOTESA0.3GENERAL NOTESA0.4SYMBOLS & ABBREVIATIONSA1SITE PLANA2FIRST FLOORA2.1SECOND FLOORA4EXTERIOR ELEVATIONSA4.1EXTERIOR ELEVATIONSA4.2EXTERIOR ELEVATIONSA4.3MATERIAL BOARDA4.4WOOD SPECA4.6STONE SPECA5ROOF PLANA6SECTIONSA73D VIEWSA7.1RENDERINGSE1ELECTRICAL PLANS1STRUCTURAL PLANS2DETAILSPROPOSED -2 STORY BUILDINGA. OWNER• NAME:KAMRAN AKBAR -ML MORTGAGE CORP• MAIL:• CONTACT NO:909-697-0585• EMAILKAMRAN@MLMORTGAGE.NETB. DESIGNER• NAME:EVERETT SMITHDESIGNS• CONTACT NO:(951 ) 323 2187 • EMAIL:EVERETT@EVERETTSMITHDESIGNS.COMC. CONTRACTOR• NAME:• ADDRESS:• CONTACT NO: • EMAILD. STRUCTURAL• NAME:• CONTACT NO:• EMAIL:E. ELECTRICAL• NAME:• CONTACT NO:• EMAIL:A. BUILDING INFO• USE TYPE:COMMERCIAL OFFICE BUILDING• OCCUPANCY:B• CONSTRUCT TYPE: I-AB. C. SITE INFO• LOT AREA:31,233• PARCEL # (APN):0208-062-10-0000• LEGAL DESCRIPTION:TRACT 12176 LOT 14 AND INT IN COM AREA• ZONE:COMMERCIALCONTRACTOR RESPONSIBILITY"CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBILITY" EACH CONTRACTOR OR SUB-CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE WIND AND /OR SEISMIC RESISTING SYSTEM THAT IS LISTED IN THE STATEMENT OF SPECIAL INSPECTIONS SHALL SUBMIT A WRITTEN STATEMENT OF RESPONSIBILITY TO THE BUILDING OFFICIAL AND THE OWNER PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF WORK REQUIRING SPECIAL INSPECTION. THE CONTRACTORS STATEMENT OF RESPONSIBILITY SHALL CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING1. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF AWARENESS OF THE SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THE STATEMENT OF SPECIAL INSPECTIONS.2. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT THAT CONTROL WILL BE EXERCISED TO OBTAIN CONFORMANCE WITH THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS APPROVED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL.3. PROCEDURES FOR EXERCISING CONTROL WITHIN THE CONTRACTOR'S ORGANIZATION, THE METHOD AND FREQUENCY OF REPORTING AND THE DISTRIBUTION OF REPORTS AND SCHEDULE4. IDENTIFICATION AND QUALIFICATIONS OF THE PERSON(S) EXERCISING SUCH CONTROL AND THEIR POSITION(S) IN THE ORGANIZATION"GENERAL NOTES1. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND EXISTING CONDITIONS PRIOR TO STARTING WORK, AND SHALL NOTIFY THE DESIGNER OF DISCREPANCIES OR INCONSISTENCIES.2. THE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS REPRESENT THE FINISHED STRUCTURE. THEY DO NOT REPRESENT THE METHOD OF CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL MEASURES NECESSARY TO PROTECT THE STRUCTURE DURING CONSTRUCTION. SUCH MEASURES SHALL INCLUDE, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, BRACING AND SHORING FOR LOADS DUE TO CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT, CONSTRUCTION LOADS OF MATERIALS, ETC. THE CONTRACTOR, AT NO EXPENSE TO THE OWNER, SHALL RETAIN QUALIFIED PROFESSIONALS TO DETERMINE FIELD LAYOUT OF THE BUILDING ELEMENTS, AND THE ADEQUACY OF ALL PROPOSED BRACING AND SHORING.3. OBSERVATION VISITS TO THE SITE BY THE ENGINEER SHALL NOT INCLUDE OBSERVATION OF SAFETY METHODS, BRACING OR SUPPORT.4. PLAN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALES SHOWN ON DRAWINGS.5. NOTES AND DETAILS ON DRAWINGS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER GENERAL NOTES AND STANDARD DETAILS.6. CLARIFICATION SHALL BE REQUESTED FROM THE ENGINEER FOR ALL WORK INDICATED ON THE PLANS THAT IS NOT SPECIFICALLY DETAILED, AND IS NOT SIMILAR TO WORK THAT IS DETAILED.7. SEE EXISTING AND / OR OTHER PLANS FOR SIZE AND LOCATION OF ALL DOOR AND WINDOW OPENINGS, SIZE AND LOCATION OF ALL NON-BEARING PARTITIONS, SIZE AND LOCATION OF ALL CURBS, DRAINS, DEPRESSED AREAS, SLOPES AND ELEVATION CHANGES, CHAMFERS, GROOVES, INSERTS, ALL FINISHES, AND SIZE AND LOCATION OF ALL FLOOR AND ROOF OPENINGS.8. SEE OTHER PLANS FOR ALL WATERPROOFING REQUIREMENTS. THE ENGINEER IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR WATERPROOFING DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS.9. MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, AND ELECTRICAL REPAIRS SHALL BE UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT AND SHALL BE PERFORMED BY A LICENSED CONTRACTOR LICENSED IN THE APPROPRIATE FIELD.10. MATERIALS SHALL BE SPREAD OUT IF PLACED ON FRAMED FLOORS OR ROOFS. LOADS SHALL NOT EXCEED DESIGN LOADING FOR SUPPORTING MEMBERS.11. UNLESS APPROVED BY THE LOCAL C.B.O. OR BUILDING DEPARTMENT (PER CPC SECTION 301.2.5.) PEX IS NOT AN APPROVED BUILDING MATERIAL.NPDES NOTESNOTES MUST BE SHOWN AS WORDED, ON THE TITLE SHEET OF THE PLAN.1. IN THE CASE OF EMERGENCY, CALL: • AT WORK PHONE #: • OR CELL PHONE #:2. SEDIMENT FROM AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE RETAINED ON SITE USING STRUCTURAL CONTROLS TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PRACTICABLE.3. STOCKPILES OF SOIL SHALL BE PROPERLY CONTAINED TO MINIMIZE SEDIMENT TRANSPORT FROM THE SITE TO STREETS, DRAINAGE FACILITIES OR ADJACENT PROPERTIES VIA RUNOFF, VEHICLE TACKING, OR WIND.4. APPROPRIATE BMPS FOR CONSTRUCTION RELATED MATERIALS, WASTES, SPILLS SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED TO MINIMIZE TRANSPORT FROM THE SITE TO STREETS, DRAINAGE FACILITIES, OR ADJOINING PROPERTIES BY WIND OR RUNOFF.5. RUNOFF FROM EQUIPMENT AND VEHICLE WASHING SHALL BE CONTAINED AT CONSTRUCTION SITE UNLESS TREATED TO REDUCE OR REMOVE SEDIMENT AND OTHER POLLUTANTS.6. ALL CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR AND SUBCONTRACTOR PERSONNEL ARE TO BE MADE AWARE OR THE REQUIRED BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES AND GOOD HOUSEKEEPING MEASURES FOR THE PROJECT SITE AND ANY ASSOCIATED CONSTRUCTION STAGING AREAS.7. AT THE END OF EACH DAY OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY ALL CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS AND WASTE MATERIALS SHALL BE COLLECTED AND PROPERLY DISPOSED IN TRASH OR RECYCLE BINS.8. CONSTRUCTION SITES SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN SUCH A CONDITION THAT AN ANTICIPATED STORM DOES NOT CARRY WASTES OR POLLUTANTS OFF THE SITE. DISCHARGES OF MATERIAL OTHER THAN STORM WATER ONLY WHEN NECESSARY FOR PERFORMANCE AND COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES AND WHERE THEY DO NOT: CAUSE OR CONTRIBUTE TO A VIOLATION OF ANY WATER QUALITY STANDARD; CAUSE OR THREATEN TO CAUSE POLLUTION, CONTAMINATION, OR NUISANCE; OR CONTAIN A HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE IN A QUANTITY REPORTABLE UNDER FEDERAL REGULATIONS 40 CFR PARTS 117 AND 302.9. POTENTIAL POLLUTANTS INCLUDE BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO: SOLID OR LIQUID CHEMICAL SPILLS; WASTES FROM PAINTS, STAINS, SEALANTS, GLUES, LIMES, PESTICIDES, HERBICIDES, WOOD PRESERVATIVES AND SOLVENTS; ASBESTOS FIBERS, PAINT FLAKES OR STUCCO FRAGMENTS; FUELS, OILS, LUBRICANTS, AND HYDRAULIC, RADIATOR OR BATTERY FLUIDS; FERTILIZERS, VEHICLE/EQUIPMENT WASH WATER AND CONCRETE WASH WATER; CONCRETE, DETERGENT OR FLOATABLE WASTES; WASTES FROM ANY ENGINE/EQUIPMENT STEAM CLEANING OR CHEMICAL DEGREASING AND SUPER CHLORINATED POTABLE WATER LINE FLUSHING. DURING CONSTRUCTION, PERMITTEE SHALL DISPOSE OF SUCH MATERIALS IN A SPECIFIED AND CONTROLLED TEMPORARY AREA ON SITE, PHYSICALLY SEPARATED FROM POTENTIAL STORM WATER RUNOFF, WITH ULTIMATE DISPOSAL IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS.10. DEWATERING OF CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER, OR DISCHARGING CONTAMINATED SOILS VIA SURFACE EROSION IS PROHIBITED. DEWATERING OF NON CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER REQUIRES A NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM PERMIT FROM THE RESPECTIVE STATE REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD.11. GRADED AREAS ON THE PERMITTED AREA PERIMETER MUST DRAIN AWAY FROM THE FACE OF SLOPES AT THE CONCLUSION OF EACH WORKING DAY. DRAINAGE IS TO BE DIRECTED TOWARD DESILTING FACILITIES.12. THE PERMITTEE AND CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE AND SHALL TAKE NECESSARY PRECAUTIONS TO PREVENT PUBLIC TRESPASS ONTO AREAS WHERE IMPOUNDED WATER CREATES A HAZARDOUS CONDITION.13. THE PERMITTEE AND CONTRACTOR SHALL INSPECT THE EROSION CONTROL WORK AND INSURE THAT THE WORK IS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED PLANS.14. THE PERMITTEE SHALL NOTIFY ALL GENERAL CONTRACTORS, SUBCONTRACTORS, MATERIAL SUPPLIERS, LESSEES, AND PROPERTY OWNERS: THAT DUMPING OF CHEMICALS INTO THE STORM DRAIN SYSTEM OR THE WATERSHED IS PROHIBITED.15. EQUIPMENT AND WORKERS FOR EMERGENCY WORK SHALL BE MADE AVAILABLE AT ALL TIMES DURING THE RAINY SEASON. NECESSARY MATERIALS SHALL BE AVAILABLE ON SITE AND STOCKPILED AT CONVENIENT LOCATIONS TO FACILITATE RAPID CONSTRUCTION OF TEMPORARY DEVICES WHEN RAIN IS IMMINENT.16. ALL REMOVABLE EROSION PROTECTIVE DEVICES SHALL BE IN PLACE AT THE END OF EACH WORKING DAY WHEN THE 5 DAY RAIN PROBABILITY FORECAST EXCEEDS 40%.17. SEDIMENTS FROM AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE RETAINED ON SITE USING AN EFFECTIVE COMBINATION OF EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PRACTICABLE, AND STOCKPILES OF SOIL SHALL BE PROPERLY CONTAINED TO MINIMIZE SEDIMENT TRANSPORT FROM THE SITE TO STREETS, DRAINAGE FACILITIES OR ADJACENT PROPERTIES VIA RUNOFF, VEHICLE TRACKING, OR WIND.18. APPROPRIATE BMPS FOR CONSTRUCTION RELATED MATERIALS, WASTES, SPILLS OR RESIDUES SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED AND RETAINED ON SITE TO MINIMIZE TRANSPORT FROM THE SITE TO STREETS, DRAINAGE FACILITIES, OR ADJOINING PROPERTY BY WIND OR RUNOFF.APPLICABLE STANDARDS• 2019 CALIFORNIA RESIDENTIAL CODE (CRC) • 2019 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE (CBC)• 2019 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE (CPC) • 2019 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE (CEC)• 2019 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE (CMC) • 2019 CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDINGPROJECT DIRECTORYPROJECT INFORMATIONTHE SITESQUARE FOOTAGE & LOT COVERAGESCOPE OF WORKA. SCOPE OF WORK• PROPOSED 2 -STORY OFFICE BUILDING APPROX 13,000SFGENERAL NOTESVICINITY MAPNo. Description Date1" = 20'-0"21ST FL1" = 20'-0"3SECOND FLPROPOSED AREANameAreaNON. PARK.2197 SFPROPOSED GROUND FLOOR ARE A5460 SFPROPOSED SECOND FLOOR5460 SF13116 SF“NON PARKING AREA” = ELEVATOR, THE STAIRS, THE RESTROOMS AND HALLWAYS UNDER 44 INCHES ARE NOT INCLUDED IN PARKING COUNT SQUARE FOOTAGE 5460 + 5460 = 10920SFTOTAL:NON PARKING AREA = 2197SF029 ------9' - 6"12' - 0"3' - 7"7' - 2"6' - 10"5 ' - 0 " 5 ' - 0 "A41A4.32MEN'S RESTROOMWOMEN'S RESTROOMELEVATOR14' - 11"8' - 2"9' - 1"4' - 0"1' - 1"4' - 0"7' - 1"4' - 0"9' - 6"4' - 0"1' - 1"4' - 0"11' - 9"4' - 0"1' - 1"4' - 0"6' - 2"1 0 ' - 0 " 2 ' - 8 " 6 ' - 1 " 1 ' - 0 "16' - 0"5' - 0"8' - 0"4' - 0"1' - 1"4' - 0"1' - 1"4' - 0"11' - 9"4' - 0"6' - 2"5' - 9"4' - 0"5' - 11"4' - 0"10' - 4"4' - 0"8' - 8"4' - 0"1' - 2"4' - 1"16' - 5"68' - 4"19' - 1"55' - 0"-A4.12A4.21A4.11A4.31A42CONFERENCE ROOMBREAK ROOMOFFICEOFFICEOFFICEOFFICEOFFICEOFFICESTORAGEBREAK ROOMHALLOFFICEOFFICEBREAK ROOMOFFICEOFFICEHALLLOBBYCONFERENCE ROOMOFFICEOFFICEOFFICE OFFICE OFFICEOFFICEOFFICEOFFICE97' - 9"5 ' - 3 " 4 ' - 0 " 3 ' - 0 "3 1 ' - 8 "25' - 2"D3D3D3D3D3D3D3D3D3D3D3D3D3D3D3D3D3D3D3D3D3D3D4D4D3D3D1D3D3D6D6D6D2D4D4D10D9D8D72' - 6"30"48"48"30"2' - 6"2' - 6"EQEQEQEQ1' - 7"1' - 7"15' - 5"3' - 8"ScaleProject numberDateDrawn byChecked byThis document, and the ideas and designs incorporated herein, as an instrument of professional service, is the property of Everett Smith, and is not to be used in whole or in part, for any other project without the written authorization of Everett Smith/ ESDESIGNS. All Rights ReservedPREPARED BY:Email: everett@everettsmithdesigns.comRIVERSIDE COUNTY, CATEL:951-323-2187EEEEVVVVEEEERRRREEEETTTTTTTT SSSSMMMMIIIITTTTHHHH PROJECT:CLIENT NAME:PROJECT ADDRESS:REVISIONS:DDDD S DDDD EEEE SSSS IIII GGGG NNNN SSSSE201910/14/2020 2:01:25 PM3/16" = 1'-0"10/14/2020 2:01:25 PMZ:\Shared\Everett Smith Designs\___ES Design Jobs\20-2028 8281 UTICA AVE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA\20-2028 8281 UTICA AVE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA 10.14.rteA2FIRST FLOOR20-2028ML MORTGAGECORP.RMESNEW 2 STORY COMMERICALBUILDING8281 UTICA AVE,RANCHO CUCAMONGA3/16" = 1'-0"1FIRST FLOORNo. Description DateDOOR SCHEDULEMarkFamily and TypeWidth Height CommentsD1 Double-Glass: 50685' - 0"6' - 8"D2 Single-1_Panel-Wood: 26682' - 6"6' - 8"D3 Single-1_Panel-Wood: 30683' - 0"6' - 8"D4 Flush_Door_w_ADA_Clearances_1663: 3'-0" x 7'-0" Flush, 2" Head 3' - 0"7' - 0"D6 Door-Double-Flush_Panel: 72" x 80"6' - 0"6' - 8"D7 Curtain Wall-Store Front-Dbl: Store Front Double Door5' - 9 1/2" 6' - 10 3/4"D8 Curtain Wall Sgl Glass: Curtain Wall Sgl Glass2' - 9 1/4" 6' - 8 1/4"D9 Curtain Wall Sgl Glass: Curtain Wall Sgl Glass2' - 8 1/4" 6' - 8 1/4"D10 Curtain Wall Sgl Glass: Curtain Wall Sgl Glass2' - 8 1/4" 6' - 8 1/4"GROUND FLOOR ROOM SCHEDULEROOM NAME AREAMEN'S RESTROOM100 SFWOMEN'S RESTROOM84 SFELEVATOR53 SFCONFERENCE ROOM240 SFBREAK ROOM231 SFOFFICE95 SFOFFICE95 SFOFFICE95 SFOFFICE95 SFOFFICE95 SFOFFICE95 SFSTORAGE100 SFBREAK ROOM123 SFHALL1274 SFOFFICE100 SFOFFICE100 SFBREAK ROOM121 SFOFFICE98 SFOFFICE98 SFRoom40 SFHALL832 SFLOBBY483 SFCONFERENCE ROOM272 SFOFFICE100 SFOFFICE84 SFOFFICE152 SFOFFICE147 SFOFFICE160 SFOFFICE95 SFOFFICE95 SFOFFICE45 SFWINDOW SCHEDULEMark Family and Type Width Height CommentsSystem Panel: GlazedW1 System Panel: Glazed 0' - 0 15/32" 1' - 8 1/4"W2 System Panel: Glazed 0' - 0 15/32" 6' - 8 1/4"W3 System Panel: Glazed 0' - 7 1/4" 1' - 8 1/4"W4 System Panel: Glazed 0' - 7 1/4" 6' - 8 1/4"W5 System Panel: Glazed 0' - 8 1/4" 1' - 8 1/4"W6 System Panel: Glazed 0' - 8 1/4" 6' - 8 1/4"W9 System Panel: Glazed 1' - 8 1/4" 2' - 2 21/32"W10 System Panel: Glazed 1' - 8 1/4"W11 System Panel: Glazed 1' - 8 1/4" 6' - 8 1/4"W12 System Panel: Glazed 1' - 8 1/4" 6' - 10 27/32"W13 System Panel: Glazed 2' - 8 1/4" 1' - 8 1/4"W14 System Panel: Glazed 2' - 9 1/4" 1' - 8 1/4"W15 System Panel: Glazed 2' - 9 1/2" 2' - 2 21/32"W16 System Panel: Glazed 2' - 9 1/2" 1' - 8 1/4"W17 System Panel: Glazed 2' - 9 1/2" 6' - 10 27/32"W19 System Panel: Glazed 3' - 6 17/32" 1' - 8 1/4"W20 System Panel: Glazed 3' - 6 17/32" 6' - 8 1/4"W21 System Panel: Glazed 3' - 6 17/32" 1' - 8 1/4"W22 System Panel: Glazed 3' - 6 17/32" 6' - 8 1/4"W23 System Panel: Glazed 3' - 7" 1' - 8 1/4"W24 System Panel: Glazed 3' - 7" 6' - 8 1/4"W25 System Panel: Glazed 1' - 8 1/4"W26 System Panel: Glazed 6' - 8 1/4"W27 System Panel: Glazed 3' - 9 1/2" 1' - 8 1/4"W28 System Panel: Glazed 3' - 9 1/2" 6' - 8 1/4"030 DNDN------ELEVATORA41A4.3215' - 0"8' - 0"9' - 1"9' - 1"7' - 1"4' - 0"9' - 6"4' - 0"1' - 1"4' - 0"11' - 9"4' - 0"1' - 1"4' - 0"12' - 0"9 ' - 7 " 1 0 ' - 0 "8' - 6"16' - 0"5' - 0"8' - 0"1' - 10"19' - 1"4' - 0"1' - 1"4' - 0"1' - 1"4' - 0"6' - 9"4' - 0"1' - 1"4' - 0"4' - 0"5' - 11"4' - 0"10' - 4"4' - 0"8' - 8"4' - 0"1' - 2"4' - 1"54' - 11"WOMEN'S RESTROOMMEN'S RESTROOM39' - 4"3 3 ' - 9 "6' - 1"68' - 2"5' - 8"6' - 1"16' - 4"-A4.12A4.21A4.11A4.31A42CONFERENCE ROOMBREAK ROOMOFFICEOFFICEOFFICEOFFICEOFFICEOFFICEOFFICEHALLOFFICEOFFICEBREAK ROOMSTORAGEOFFICEOFFICEBREAK ROOMCONFERENCE ROOMOFFICEOFFICEOFFICEOFFICEOFFICEOFFICEOFFICEVESTIBULE0' - 1"97' - 8"D3D3D3D3D3D3D3D3D3D3D3D4D4D3D3D3D3D3D3D3D3D3D3D3D3D4D4D3D3D3D6D6D6D62' - 6"30"48"48"30"2' - 6"2' - 6"EQEQEQEQ1' - 7"1' - 7"ScaleProject numberDateDrawn byChecked byThis document, and the ideas and designs incorporated herein, as an instrument of professional service, is the property of Everett Smith, and is not to be used in whole or in part, for any other project without the written authorization of Everett Smith/ ESDESIGNS. All Rights ReservedPREPARED BY:Email: everett@everettsmithdesigns.comRIVERSIDE COUNTY, CATEL:951-323-2187EEEEVVVVEEEERRRREEEETTTTTTTT SSSSMMMMIIIITTTTHHHH PROJECT:CLIENT NAME:PROJECT ADDRESS:REVISIONS:DDDD S DDDD EEEE SSSS IIII GGGG NNNN SSSSE201910/14/2020 2:01:25 PM3/16" = 1'-0"10/14/2020 2:01:25 PMZ:\Shared\Everett Smith Designs\___ES Design Jobs\20-2028 8281 UTICA AVE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA\20-2028 8281 UTICA AVE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA 10.14.rteA2.1SECOND FLOOR20-2028ML MORTGAGECORP.RMESNEW 2 STORY COMMERICALBUILDING8281 UTICA AVE,RANCHO CUCAMONGANo. Description Date3/16" = 1'-0"1SECOND FLWINDOW SCHEDULEMark Family and Type Width Height CommentsSystem Panel: GlazedW1 System Panel: Glazed 0' - 0 15/32" 1' - 8 1/4"W2 System Panel: Glazed 0' - 0 15/32" 6' - 8 1/4"W3 System Panel: Glazed 0' - 7 1/4" 1' - 8 1/4"W4 System Panel: Glazed 0' - 7 1/4" 6' - 8 1/4"W5 System Panel: Glazed 0' - 8 1/4" 1' - 8 1/4"W6 System Panel: Glazed 0' - 8 1/4" 6' - 8 1/4"W9 System Panel: Glazed 1' - 8 1/4" 2' - 2 21/32"W10 System Panel: Glazed1' - 8 1/4"W11 System Panel: Glazed 1' - 8 1/4" 6' - 8 1/4"W12 System Panel: Glazed 1' - 8 1/4" 6' - 10 27/32"W13 System Panel: Glazed 2' - 8 1/4" 1' - 8 1/4"W14 System Panel: Glazed 2' - 9 1/4" 1' - 8 1/4"W15 System Panel: Glazed 2' - 9 1/2" 2' - 2 21/32"W16 System Panel: Glazed 2' - 9 1/2" 1' - 8 1/4"W17 System Panel: Glazed 2' - 9 1/2" 6' - 10 27/32"W19 System Panel: Glazed 3' - 6 17/32" 1' - 8 1/4"W20 System Panel: Glazed 3' - 6 17/32" 6' - 8 1/4"W21 System Panel: Glazed 3' - 6 17/32" 1' - 8 1/4"W22 System Panel: Glazed 3' - 6 17/32" 6' - 8 1/4"W23 System Panel: Glazed 3' - 7" 1' - 8 1/4"W24 System Panel: Glazed 3' - 7" 6' - 8 1/4"W25 System Panel: Glazed1' - 8 1/4"W26 System Panel: Glazed6' - 8 1/4"W27 System Panel: Glazed 3' - 9 1/2" 1' - 8 1/4"W28 System Panel: Glazed 3' - 9 1/2" 6' - 8 1/4"DOOR SCHEDULEMarkFamily and TypeWidth Height CommentsD1 Double-Glass: 50685' - 0"6' - 8"D2 Single-1_Panel-Wood: 26682' - 6"6' - 8"D3 Single-1_Panel-Wood: 30683' - 0"6' - 8"D4 Flush_Door_w_ADA_Clearances_1663: 3'-0" x 7'-0" Flush, 2" Head 3' - 0"7' - 0"D6 Door-Double-Flush_Panel: 72" x 80"6' - 0"6' - 8"D7 Curtain Wall-Store Front-Dbl: Store Front Double Door5' - 9 1/2" 6' - 10 3/4"D8 Curtain Wall Sgl Glass: Curtain Wall Sgl Glass2' - 9 1/4" 6' - 8 1/4"D9 Curtain Wall Sgl Glass: Curtain Wall Sgl Glass2' - 8 1/4" 6' - 8 1/4"D10 Curtain Wall Sgl Glass: Curtain Wall Sgl Glass2' - 8 1/4" 6' - 8 1/4"SECOND FLOOR ROOM SCHEDULEROOM NAMEAREAELEVATOR54 SFMEN'S RESTROOM99 SFWOMEN'S RESTROOM84 SFCONFERENCE ROOM240 SFBREAK ROOM231 SFOFFICE95 SFOFFICE90 SFOFFICE90 SFOFFICE90 SFOFFICE95 SFOFFICE95 SFOFFICE95 SFHALL1194 SFOFFICE100 SFOFFICE100 SFBREAK ROOM123 SFSTORAGE100 SFOFFICE100 SFOFFICE100 SFBREAK ROOM123 SFCONFERENCE ROOM271 SFOFFICE100 SFOFFICE84 SFOFFICE144 SFOFFICE847 SFOFFICE144 SFOFFICE151 SFOFFICE119 SFOFFICERedundant RoomOFFICE121 SFVESTIBULE495 SF031 A4.12A4.21A4.11A42A 411ST FL0' -0"GRADE-0' -8"T.O. 1ST10' -8"T.O. SECOND22' -8"T.O. ROOF26' -0"SECOND FL12' -8"Level 1730' -8"11111111111111232222222221161' - 5"4' - 8"3' - 4"10' - 0"2' - 0"10' - 8"3' - 0"44444442' - 0"27' - 0"555555556333' - 0"30' - 8"1' - 0"7778888881ST FL0' -0"GRADE-0' -8"T.O. 1ST10' -8"T.O. SECOND22' -8"T.O. ROOF26' -0"SECOND FL12' -8"Level 1730' -8"111111111111332222222245454510' - 8"2' - 0"10' - 0"3' - 4"4' - 8"30' - 8"1' - 5"3' - 0"7' - 0"1' - 3"788ScaleProject numberDateDrawn byChecked byThis document, and the ideas and designs incorporated herein, as an instrument of professional service, is the property of Everett Smith, and is not to be used in whole or in part, for any other project without the written authorization of Everett Smith/ ESDESIGNS. All Rights ReservedPREPARED BY:Email: everett@everettsmithdesigns.comRIVERSIDE COUNTY, CATEL:951-323-2187EEEEVVVVEEEERRRREEEETTTTTTTT SSSSMMMMIIIITTTTHHHH PROJECT:CLIENT NAME:PROJECT ADDRESS:REVISIONS:DDDD S DDDD EEEE SSSS IIII GGGG NNNN SSSSE201910/14/2020 2:01:29 PMAs indicated10/14/2020 2:01:29 PMZ:\Shared\Everett Smith Designs\___ES Design Jobs\20-2028 8281 UTICA AVE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA\20-2028 8281 UTICA AVE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA 10.14.rteA4EXTERIORELEVATIONS20-2028ML MORTGAGECORP.RMESNEW 2 STORY COMMERICALBUILDING8281 UTICA AVE,RANCHO CUCAMONGANo. Description Date1" = 30'-0"KEYPLANELEVATION KEYNOTESKEYNOTE1 ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM2 WALL REVEAL3 ALUMINUM CANOPY4 STONE LEDGER5 NEW CORONADO STONE VENEER6 WOOD TEAK SIDING7 WALL LIGHTS8 OUTDOOR LIGHTS3/16" = 1'-0"1FRONT ELEVATION3/16" = 1'-0"2ELEVATION A032 A4.12A4.21A4.11A42A 411ST FL0' -0"GRADE-0' -8"T.O. 1ST10' -8"T.O. SECOND22' -8"T.O. ROOF26' -0"SECOND FL12' -8"Level 1730' -8"1111111111111111111111322222322325' - 0"3' - 0"6541' - 5"1' - 8"2' - 0"54365410' - 8"2' - 0"10' - 0"3' - 4"4' - 8"30' - 8"7' - 0"1' - 0"78881ST FL0' -0"GRADE-0' -8"T.O. 1ST10' -8"T.O. SECOND22' -8"T.O. ROOF26' -0"SECOND FL12' -8"Level 1730' -8"11111111113322222334422551' - 5"2' - 8"0' - 8"1' - 8"2' - 0"4' - 8"3' - 4"10' - 0"2' - 0"1' - 3"1' - 3"1' - 0"7888ScaleProject numberDateDrawn byChecked byThis document, and the ideas and designs incorporated herein, as an instrument of professional service, is the property of Everett Smith, and is not to be used in whole or in part, for any other project without the written authorization of Everett Smith/ ESDESIGNS. All Rights ReservedPREPARED BY:Email: everett@everettsmithdesigns.comRIVERSIDE COUNTY, CATEL:951-323-2187EEEEVVVVEEEERRRREEEETTTTTTTT SSSSMMMMIIIITTTTHHHH PROJECT:CLIENT NAME:PROJECT ADDRESS:REVISIONS:DDDD S DDDD EEEE SSSS IIII GGGG NNNN SSSSE201910/14/2020 2:01:33 PMAs indicated10/14/2020 2:01:33 PMZ:\Shared\Everett Smith Designs\___ES Design Jobs\20-2028 8281 UTICA AVE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA\20-2028 8281 UTICA AVE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA 10.14.rteA4.1EXTERIORELEVATIONS20-2028ML MORTGAGECORP.RMESNEW 2 STORY COMMERICALBUILDING8281 UTICA AVE,RANCHO CUCAMONGANo. Description Date1" = 30'-0"KEYPLANELEVATION KEYNOTESKEYNOTE1 ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM2 WALL REVEAL3 ALUMINUM CANOPY4 STONE LEDGER5 NEW CORONADO STONE VENEER6 WOOD TEAK SIDING7 WALL LIGHTS8 OUTDOOR LIGHTS3/16" = 1'-0"1RIGHT ELEVATION3/16" = 1'-0"2REAR ELEVATION033 A4.12A4.21A4.11A42A 411ST FL0' -0"GRADE-0' -8"T.O. 1ST10' -8"T.O. SECOND22' -8"T.O. ROOF26' -0"SECOND FL12' -8"Level 1730' -8"1111111111111111333322222222452245451' - 0"2' - 0"0' - 8"3' - 0"3' - 4"10' - 0"2' - 0"10' - 8"26' - 0"7' - 0"1' - 4"11788ScaleProject numberDateDrawn byChecked byThis document, and the ideas and designs incorporated herein, as an instrument of professional service, is the property of Everett Smith, and is not to be used in whole or in part, for any other project without the written authorization of Everett Smith/ ESDESIGNS. All Rights ReservedPREPARED BY:Email: everett@everettsmithdesigns.comRIVERSIDE COUNTY, CATEL:951-323-2187EEEEVVVVEEEERRRREEEETTTTTTTT SSSSMMMMIIIITTTTHHHH PROJECT:CLIENT NAME:PROJECT ADDRESS:REVISIONS:DDDD S DDDD EEEE SSSS IIII GGGG NNNN SSSSE201910/14/2020 2:01:36 PMAs indicated10/14/2020 2:01:36 PMZ:\Shared\Everett Smith Designs\___ES Design Jobs\20-2028 8281 UTICA AVE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA\20-2028 8281 UTICA AVE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA 10.14.rteA4.2EXTERIORELEVATIONS20-2028ML MORTGAGECORP.RMESNEW 2 STORY COMMERICALBUILDING8281 UTICA AVE,RANCHO CUCAMONGANo. Description Date1" = 30'-0"KEYPLANELEVATION KEYNOTESKEYNOTE1 ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM2 WALL REVEAL3 ALUMINUM CANOPY4 STONE LEDGER5 NEW CORONADO STONE VENEER6 WOOD TEAK SIDING7 WALL LIGHTS8 OUTDOOR LIGHTS3/16" = 1'-0"1LEFT ELEVATION034 A4.12A4.21A4.11A42A 41 1ST FL0' -0"GRADE-0' -8"T.O. 1ST10' -8"T.O. SECOND22' -8"T.O. ROOF26' -0"SECOND FL12' -8"Level 1730' -8"PT 2PT 4ST 1PT 1WD 1ST 1ST 1PT 4PT 2PT 1PT 1PT 1PT 1PT 4PT 2PT 4ST 1ST 1PT 21ST FL0' -0"GRADE-0' -8"T.O. 1ST10' -8"T.O. SECOND22' -8"T.O. ROOF26' -0"SECOND FL12' -8"Level 1730' -8"ST 1ST 1ST 1PT 2PT 1PT 4PT 1PT 2PT 2PT 4PT 1PT 2PT 2This document, and the ideas and designs incorporated herein, as an instrument of professional service, is the property of Everett Smith, and is not to be used in whole or in part, for any other project without the written authorization of Everett Smith/EDS DESIGNS. All Rights ReservedPREPARED BY:Email: everett@everettsmithdesigns.comTEL:951-323-2187CLIENT:D E S I G N SD E S I G N SD E S I G N SD E S I G N SEVERETT SMITH EVERETT SMITH EVERETT SMITH EVERETT SMITH ScaleProject numberAs indicatedML MORTGAGE CORP.8281 UTICA AVE, RANCHO CUCAMONGAA4.3MATERIAL BOARD1" = 30'-0"KEYPLANFRONT ELEVATION 3/16" = 1'-0"1ELEVATION A3/16" = 1'-0"2PT 1PT 2PT 3PT 4ST 1WD 1CORONADO STONE VENEER -CORONADO HONEY LEDGE SIOUX FALLSWoodSTONEWOOD ARCHITECTURAL PANELS ESR-4154SHERWIN WILLIAMS PAINT035 ScaleProject numberDateDrawn byChecked byThis document, and the ideas and designs incorporated herein, as an instrument of professional service, is the property of Everett Smith, and is not to be used in whole or in part, for any other project without the written authorization of Everett Smith/ ESDESIGNS. All Rights ReservedPREPARED BY:Email: everett@everettsmithdesigns.comRIVERSIDE COUNTY, CATEL:951-323-2187EEEEVVVVEEEERRRREEEETTTTTTTT SSSSMMMMIIIITTTTHHHH PROJECT:CLIENT NAME:PROJECT ADDRESS:REVISIONS:DDDD S DDDD EEEE SSSS IIII GGGG NNNN SSSSE201910/14/2020 2:01:50 PM10/14/2020 2:01:50 PMZ:\Shared\Everett Smith Designs\___ES Design Jobs\20-2028 8281 UTICA AVE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA\20-2028 8281 UTICA AVE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA 10.14.rteA4.4WOOD SPEC20-2028ML MORTGAGECORP.RMESNEW 2 STORY COMMERICALBUILDING8281 UTICA AVE,RANCHO CUCAMONGANo. Description Date036 ScaleProject numberDateDrawn byChecked byThis document, and the ideas and designs incorporated herein, as an instrument of professional service, is the property of Everett Smith, and is not to be used in whole or in part, for any other project without the written authorization of Everett Smith/ ESDESIGNS. All Rights ReservedPREPARED BY:Email: everett@everettsmithdesigns.comRIVERSIDE COUNTY, CATEL:951-323-2187EEEEVVVVEEEERRRREEEETTTTTTTT SSSSMMMMIIIITTTTHHHH PROJECT:CLIENT NAME:PROJECT ADDRESS:REVISIONS:DDDD S DDDD EEEE SSSS IIII GGGG NNNN SSSSE201910/14/2020 2:01:51 PM10/14/2020 2:01:51 PMZ:\Shared\Everett Smith Designs\___ES Design Jobs\20-2028 8281 UTICA AVE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA\20-2028 8281 UTICA AVE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA 10.14.rteA4.6STONE SPEC20-2028ML MORTGAGECORP.AuthorCheckerNEW 2 STORY COMMERICALBUILDING8281 UTICA AVE,RANCHO CUCAMONGANo. Description Date037 1. FLAT ROOF WITH CLASS 'A' ROOF THROUGHOUT2. BUILDING LINE BELOW3. PARAPET4. CRICKET WITH 5/8" PLYWOOD WITH MINIMUM SLOPE OF 3/8" PER FOOT TYPICAL.5. ROOF DRAIN WITH OVERFLOW6. MECHANICAL PLATFORM. FOR SIZE, CONSULT MECHANICAL DRAWINGS. 7. DUCT FROM BELOW (SEE MECHANICAL FOR ROOF JACK TYPE AND LOCATIONS)8. 6"X4" DRAIN OPENING AT ROOF LEVEL9. A/C UNITS10. SCUPPER11. ROOF STRUCTURE SEE STRUCT.12. 48"x96" 'BRISTOLITE' FIBERGLASS SKYLIGHT, W/13. ROOF ACCESS LADDER2% SLOPE2% SLOPEScaleProject numberDateDrawn byChecked byThis document, and the ideas and designs incorporated herein, as an instrument of professional service, is the property of Everett Smith, and is not to be used in whole or in part, for any other project without the written authorization of Everett Smith/ ESDESIGNS. All Rights ReservedPREPARED BY:Email: everett@everettsmithdesigns.comRIVERSIDE COUNTY, CATEL:951-323-2187EEEEVVVVEEEERRRREEEETTTTTTTT SSSSMMMMIIIITTTTHHHH PROJECT:CLIENT NAME:PROJECT ADDRESS:REVISIONS:DDDD S DDDD EEEE SSSS IIII GGGG NNNN SSSSE201910/14/2020 2:01:51 PM1/4" = 1'-0"10/14/2020 2:01:51 PMZ:\Shared\Everett Smith Designs\___ES Design Jobs\20-2028 8281 UTICA AVE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA\20-2028 8281 UTICA AVE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA 10.14.rteA5ROOF PLAN20-2028ML MORTGAGECORP.RMESNEW 2 STORY COMMERICALBUILDING8281 UTICA AVE,RANCHO CUCAMONGANo. Description Date1/4" = 1'-0"1T.O.P. 2ND038 1ST FL0' -0"GRADE-0' -8"T.O. 1ST10' -8"T.O. SECOND22' -8"T.O. ROOF26' -0"SECOND FL12' -8"2A6OFFICEBREAK ROOMHALLOFFICE?OFFICEOFFICE HALLBREAK ROOMOFFICEOFFICE1ST FL0' -0"GRADE-0' -8"T.O. 1ST10' -8"T.O. SECOND22' -8"T.O. ROOF26' -0"SECOND FL12' -8"1A6ELEVATORWOMEN'S RESTROOMWOMEN'S RESTROOMELEVATORBREAK ROOMOFFICEOFFICELOBBYOFFICEOFFICEBREAK ROOMVESTIBULEVESTIBULELOBBYScaleProject numberDateDrawn byChecked byThis document, and the ideas and designs incorporated herein, as an instrument of professional service, is the property of Everett Smith, and is not to be used in whole or in part, for any other project without the written authorization of Everett Smith/ ESDESIGNS. All Rights ReservedPREPARED BY:Email: everett@everettsmithdesigns.comRIVERSIDE COUNTY, CATEL:951-323-2187EEEEVVVVEEEERRRREEEETTTTTTTT SSSSMMMMIIIITTTTHHHH PROJECT:CLIENT NAME:PROJECT ADDRESS:REVISIONS:DDDD S DDDD EEEE SSSS IIII GGGG NNNN SSSSE201910/14/2020 2:01:52 PM3/16" = 1'-0"10/14/2020 2:01:52 PMZ:\Shared\Everett Smith Designs\___ES Design Jobs\20-2028 8281 UTICA AVE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA\20-2028 8281 UTICA AVE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA 10.14.rteA6SECTIONS20-2028ML MORTGAGECORP.RMESNEW 2 STORY COMMERICALBUILDING8281 UTICA AVE,RANCHO CUCAMONGANo. Description Date3/16" = 1'-0"1Section A3/16" = 1'-0"2Section B039 ScaleProject numberDateDrawn byChecked byThis document, and the ideas and designs incorporated herein, as an instrument of professional service, is the property of Everett Smith, and is not to be used in whole or in part, for any other project without the written authorization of Everett Smith/ ESDESIGNS. All Rights ReservedPREPARED BY:Email: everett@everettsmithdesigns.comRIVERSIDE COUNTY, CATEL:951-323-2187EEEEVVVVEEEERRRREEEETTTTTTTT SSSSMMMMIIIITTTTHHHH PROJECT:CLIENT NAME:PROJECT ADDRESS:REVISIONS:DDDD S DDDD EEEE SSSS IIII GGGG NNNN SSSSE201910/14/2020 2:02:22 PM10/14/2020 2:02:22 PMZ:\Shared\Everett Smith Designs\___ES Design Jobs\20-2028 8281 UTICA AVE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA\20-2028 8281 UTICA AVE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA 10.14.rteA73D VIEWS20-2028ML MORTGAGECORP.ESESNEW 2 STORY COMMERICALBUILDING8281 UTICA AVE,RANCHO CUCAMONGANo. Description Date040 This document, and the ideas and designs incorporated herein, as an instrument of professional service, is the property of Everett Smith, and is not to be used in whole or in part, for any other project without the written authorization of Everett Smith/EDS DESIGNS. All Rights ReservedPREPARED BY:Email: everett@everettsmithdesigns.comTEL:951-323-2187CLIENT:D E S I G N SD E S I G N SD E S I G N SD E S I G N SEVERETT SMITH EVERETT SMITH EVERETT SMITH EVERETT SMITH ScaleProject numberML MORTGAGE CORP.8281 UTICA AVE, RANCHO CUCAMONGAA7.1RENDERINGS041 CLEAN AIR/VANPOOL/EVCLEAN AIR/VANPOOL/EVCLEAN AIR/VANPOOL/EVCITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA8281 UTICA AVE.RANCH CUCAMONGA, CA 91730PROPOSED OFFICE BUILDING5Feet1:1204020010042 CLEAN AIR/VANPOOL/EVCLEAN AIR/VANPOOL/EVCLEAN AIR/VANPOOL/EVCITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA8281 UTICA AVE.RANCH CUCAMONGA, CA 91730PROPOSED OFFICE BUILDING5FIRE ACCESS PLAN40200Feet1:240203043 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA8281 UTICA AVE.RANCH CUCAMONGA, CA 91730PROPOSED OFFICE BUILDING5044 CLEAN AIR/VANPOOL/EVCLEAN AIR/VANPOOL/EVCLEAN AIR/VANPOOL/EVCITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA8281 UTICA AVE.RANCH CUCAMONGA, CA 91730PROPOSED OFFICE BUILDING5LEGENDTAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.EARTHWORK QUANTITIESLAND AREA:PRELIMINARY GRADING PLANFORPROPOSED OFFICE BUILDING8281 UTICA AVENUECITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA’’” ” ’ GRADING GENERAL NOTES:GRADING GENERAL NOTES (CONTINUED):CIVIL ENGINEER'S NOTICE TO CONTRACTOR:UTILITY PURVEYORS:OWNER/DEVELOPER.INDEX OF SHEETS:NOTE:1045 CLEAN AIR/VANPOOL/EVCLEAN AIR/VANPOOL/EVCLEAN AIR/VANPOOL/EVCITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA8281 UTICA AVE.RANCH CUCAMONGA, CA 91730PROPOSED OFFICE BUILDING5Feet1:1202010052046 SECTION ASection DSECTION BSECTION CSection ESection FCITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA8281 UTICA AVE.RANCH CUCAMONGA, CA 91730PROPOSED OFFICE BUILDING53047 CLEAN AIR/VANPOOL/EVCLEAN AIR/VANPOOL/EVCLEAN AIR/VANPOOL/EVCITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA8281 UTICA AVE.RANCH CUCAMONGA, CA 91730PROPOSED OFFICE BUILDING54FeetSCALE 1" = 20'201005048 CLEAN AIR/VANPOOL/EVCLEAN AIR/VANPOOL/EVCLEAN AIR/VANPOOL/EVCITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA8281 UTICA AVE.RANCH CUCAMONGA, CA 91730PROPOSED OFFICE BUILDING55049 SHEET NO.SHEET TITLEE1.0PHOTOMETRIC STUDYE2.0SPECIFICATION SHEETSPROJECT #:PROJECT NAME:PROJECT ADDRESS:23905 Clinton Keith Rd 114-381Wildomar, Ca 92595951-902-6600info@winstoneng.comwww.winstoneng.com3/30/20INITIAL RELEASE8281 UTICA AVERANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730REVISION SCHEDULEISSUEDATEThese drawings and specifications, and ideas, designs andarrangements represented are and shall remain the property ofthe engineer. No part shall be copied, disclosed to others orused in connection with any work or project other than thespecific project for which they have been prepared withoutwritten consent of the engineer. Visual contact with thesedrawings and specifications shall constitute evidence ofacceptance of these restrictions. Submittal of documents topublic agencies shall not be considered a waiver of Engineer.Copy ProtectionOFFICE BUILDING PARKING LOT LIGHTING PHOTOMETRIC10/20/20UPDATE BACKGROUNDE1.0PHOTOMETRIC STUDY328-1050 PROJECT #:PROJECT NAME:PROJECT ADDRESS:23905 Clinton Keith Rd 114-381Wildomar, Ca 92595951-902-6600info@winstoneng.comwww.winstoneng.com3/30/20INITIAL RELEASE8281 UTICA AVERANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730REVISION SCHEDULEISSUE DATEThese drawings and specifications, and ideas, designs andarrangements represented are and shall remain the property ofthe engineer. No part shall be copied, disclosed to others orused in connection with any work or project other than thespecific project for which they have been prepared withoutwritten consent of the engineer. Visual contact with thesedrawings and specifications shall constitute evidence ofacceptance of these restrictions. Submittal of documents topublic agencies shall not be considered a waiver of Engineer.Copy ProtectionOFFICE BUILDING PARKING LOT LIGHTING PHOTOMETRIC10/20/20UPDATE BACKGROUNDE2.0SPECIFICATION SHEETS328-1051 DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:00 p.m. Sean McPherson January 5, 2021 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2019-00371 – BLUE ENGINEERING & CONSULTING, INC. - A request for site plan and architectural review of an industrial building totaling 13,116 square feet on 0.72 acres of land located on a vacant parcel addressed 8281 Utica Avenue in the Industrial Park (IP) District; APN: 0208-062-10. This item is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City’s CEQA guidelines under CEQA Section 15332 –In-Fill Development Projects. Site Description: The project site consists of one vacant lot located within the Industrial Park (IP) District, on property addressed 8281 Utica Avenue. The site is generally flat and at-grade with Utica Avenue. The project site’s street frontage along Utica Avenue is improved with curb and gutter, but not with sidewalks or streetlights. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Table A: General Plan and Zoning Designations Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Vacant Industrial Park Industrial Park (IP) District North Office Industrial Park Industrial Park (IP) District South Office Industrial Park Industrial Park (IP) District West Office Industrial Park Industrial Park (IP) District East Office Industrial Park Industrial Park (IP) District Project Overview: The applicant. Blue Engineering & Consulting proposes to develop a 13,116 square foot two-story office building on 31,233 (0.72) acres of land located on a vacant parcel addressed 8281 Utica Avenue in the Industrial Park (IP) District. The applicant states that the proposed building will be used as an office building for professional services (i.e. lawyers, engineers, mortgage brokers, and architects), and is divisible into separate suites. The north/northwest (front) elevation of the office building will face Utica Avenue. Vehicular access to the project will be from a shared driveway off Utica Avenue leading to an on-site parking lot which will be located in between the street and the proposed building. Additional access to the parking lot will be provided from an adjacent parcel via another shared access driveway to the south. The floorplan includes a lobby with an elevator and two conference rooms, plus offices and restrooms on the ground floor. A vestibule, two more conference rooms, and additional offices and restrooms are located on the second floor. Storage rooms and breakrooms are also located on each floor. The project complies with the City’s landscape standards. Site landscape coverage meets the minimum requirement of 15% and includes an overall depth of 25 feet along Utica Avenue. The landscaping palette includes a variety of trees, shrubs, and ground cover to help screen mechanical equipment and enhance the appearance of the building. Exhibit C 052 DRC COMMENTS DESIGN REVIEW DRC2019-00371 – BLUE ENGINEERING & CONSULTING, INC. January 5, 2021 Page 2 The project complies with each of the related development standards for the Industrial Park (IP) District as shown on Table B below: Parking: Pursuant to Development Code Section 17.64.050, Table 17.64.050-1, parking for offices is based on the ratio of 4 parking spaces for every 1,000 gross square feet. Development Code Section 17.64.050.A.6 further provides that for commercial, office and industrial zoned properties, square footage dedicated to office hallways 44 inches or less, electrical and mechanical rooms, elevator shafts, stairwells, bathroom and storage closets may be deducted from the gross square footage for parking stall calculation purposes. Thus, while the gross floor area of the proposed project totals 13,116 square feet, approximately 2,196 square feet of the proposed project includes those areas listed above that are exempt from parking calculations. This translates into a parking requirement of 44 parking spaces for the project. Table C below demonstrates that the project meets the minimum required number of parking spaces: Table C: Parking Compliance Parking Ratio Required Parking Provided Parking Offices 4 per 1,000 square feet (exclusive of areas provided in Dev. Code Section 17.64.050.A.6) 44 spaces 44 spaces Staff Comments: Staff supports the proposed building’s architecture and site layout, which will complement the surrounding established professional office neighborhood. The building, which proposes a contemporary vernacular theme, is well designed with architectural elements that carry to each elevation (360 Degree Architecture). The primary entrance to the building is surrounded by an angled aluminum storefront system projection which also protrudes from each Table B: Compliance with Industrial park (IP) Development Standards Development Standard Required Proposed Complies? Building Height Maximum 35 feet (at front setback) and 75 feet (1-foot increment from the setback line) 30 feet, 8 inches YES Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 40-60% 41.9% (13,116 / 31,233 square feet) YES Front Building Setback (Utica Avenue) 25 feet ~87 feet YES Average Depth of Landscape 25 feet 26.2 feet YES Parking Setback 15 feet (Utica Avenue) 19.64 YES Interior Side Yard Setback Min. 5 feet 37.2 (north property line); 56 feet (south property line) YES Rear Yard Setback Min. 0 feet 10 feet YES Open Space/Landscape Standards 15% 16.8% YES 053 DRC COMMENTS DESIGN REVIEW DRC2019-00371 – BLUE ENGINEERING & CONSULTING, INC. January 5, 2021 Page 3 facade of the building. The entrance is further accentuated by a two-story wood frame feature comprised of Stonewood architectural panels (ESR-4154). Other attractive elements include an aluminum canopy at the front entrance which is supported by pillars encased in Coronado Stone veneer (Coronado Honey ledge – Sioux Falls). Both the aluminum canopy and stone veneer are respectably carried out through each facade of the building. Public frontage improvements along Utica Avenue will also be required to be completed, including a new parkway, sidewalk and streetlights. Major Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project. 1. None Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues. 1. None Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion. 1. None Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the project be forwarded to the Planning Commission as presented for final review. Design Review Committee Action: Staff Planner: Sean McPherson, Senior Planner Members Present: Staff Coordinator: Mike Smith, Principal Planner 054 055 056 RESOLUTION NO. 21-09 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2019-00371 – BLUE ENGINEERING & CONSULTING, INC. - A request for site plan and architectural review of a commercial office building totaling 13,116 square feet on 0.72 acres of land located on a vacant parcel addressed 8281 Utica Avenue in the Industrial Park (IP) District; APN: 0208-062-10. A.Recitals. 1.Angel Cesar, for Blue Engineering and Consulting, filed an application for the approval of Design Review DRC2019-00371, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Design Review request is referred to as "the application." 2.On the 10th day of February 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3.All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B.Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1.This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2.Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearings of February 10, 2021, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The vacant 0.72-acre (31,233 square feet) project site is located on property addressed 8281 Utica Avenue (APN: 0208-062-10); and b.The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning Designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: General Plan and Zoning Designations Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Vacant Industrial Park Industrial Park (IP) District North Office Industrial Park Industrial Park (IP) District South Office Industrial Park Industrial Park (IP) District West Office Industrial Park Industrial Park (IP) District East Office Industrial Park Industrial Park (IP) District c.The project is for the construction of a new two-story commercial office building totaling approximately 13,116 square feet in size at property addressed 8281 Utica Avenue; and d.The project complies with all requirements of the Development Code including setbacks, parking, design, and landscape coverage; and Exhibit D 057 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-09 DR DRC2019-00371 BLUE ENGINEERING AND CONSULTING February 10, 2021 Page 2 a. The project provides 44 parking spaces, which is the minimum number required for the proposed commercial office land uses. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan. The proposed commercial office land use is consistent with the Industrial Park (IP) General Plan land use designation; and b. The proposed use is in accord with the objective of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. Commercial office uses are permitted uses within the Industrial Park (IP) District; and c. The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. The project complies with each of the development criteria outlined in the Development Code including building setbacks, parking and design; and d. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The proposed commercial office building will not be detrimental to the surrounding land uses as it is of similar size and intensity to the surrounding commercial buildings. 4. The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City’s CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 32 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332, which permits in-fill development on parcels which are substantially surrounded by urban uses. The project is for the construction of 13,116 square foot, two-story commercial office building and there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department’s determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs in the staff’s determination of exemption. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Tony Guglielmo, Chairman 058 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-09 DR DRC2019-00371 BLUE ENGINEERING AND CONSULTING February 10, 2021 Page 3 ATTEST: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary I, Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of February 2021, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: 059 Conditions of Approval Community Development Department Project #: DRC2019-00371 Project Name: 8281 Utica New Office Building Location: 8281 UTICA AVE - 020806210-0000 Project Type: Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions A shared parking agreement between the subject property and adjacent properties shall be submitted to the Planning Department prior to the issuance of Final Occupancy. This agreement, prior to submittal to the City, shall be recorded at the County. 1. A shared access agreement between the subject property and adjacent properties shall be submitted to the Planning Department prior to the issuance of Final Occupancy. This agreement, prior to submittal to the City, shall be recorded at the County. 2. Prior to the installation of landscaping on the site, a Landscape Review plan shall be submitted to the Planning Department for review and approval. 3. Pursuant to the Habitat Assessment (2020) prepared by ELMT Consulting for the project, nesting birds are protected pursuant to the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and California Fish and Game Code (Sections 3503, 3503.5, 3511, and 3513 prohibit the take, possession, or destruction of birds, their nests or eggs). In order to protect migratory bird species, a nesting bird clearance survey should be conducted prior to any ground disturbance or vegetation removal activities that may disrupt the birds during the nesting season. If construction occurs between February 1st and August 31st, a pre-construction clearance survey for nesting birds should be conducted within three (3) days of the start of any vegetation removal or ground disturbing activities to ensure that no nesting birds will be disturbed during construction. The biologist conducting the clearance survey should document a negative survey with a brief letter report indicating that no impacts to active avian nests will occur. If an active avian nest is discovered during the pre-construction clearance survey, construction activities should stay outside of a no-disturbance buffer. The size of the no-disturbance buffer will be determined by the wildlife biologist and will depend on the level of noise and/or surrounding anthropogenic disturbances, line of sight between the nest and the construction activity, type and duration of construction activity, ambient noise, species habituation, and topographical barriers. These factors will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis when developing buffer distances. Limits of construction to avoid an active nest will be established in the field with flagging, fencing, or other appropriate barriers; and construction personnel will be instructed on the sensitivity of nest areas. A biological monitor should be present to delineate the boundaries of the buffer area and to monitor the active nest to ensure that nesting behavior is not adversely affected by the construction activity. Once the young have fledged and left the nest, or the nest otherwise becomes inactive under natural conditions, construction activities within the buffer area can occur. 4. Standard Conditions of Approval www.CityofRC.us Printed: 2/3/2021 060 Project #: DRC2019-00371 Project Name: 8281 Utica New Office Building Location: 8281 UTICA AVE - 020806210-0000 Project Type: Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 5. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations. 6. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 7. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval, Conditions of Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 8. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption fee in the amount of $50.00. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing or within 5 days of the date of project approval. 9. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 10. www.CityofRC.us Page 2 of 15Printed: 2/3/2021 061 Project #: DRC2019-00371 Project Name: 8281 Utica New Office Building Location: 8281 UTICA AVE - 020806210-0000 Project Type: Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval This project is subject to public art requirement outlined in Chapter 17.124 of the Development Code equivalent in value to $1 per square foot of building area. Prior to the issuance of building permits (for grading or construction), the applicant shall inform the Planning Department of their choice to install public art, donate art or select the in-lieu option as outlined in 17.124.020.D. If the project developer chooses to pay the in-lieu fee, the in-lieu art fee will be invoiced on the building permit by the City and shall be paid by the applicant prior to building permit issuance. If the project developer chooses to install art, they shall submit, during the plan check process, an application for the art work that will be installed on the project site that contains information applicable to the art work in addition to any other information as may be required by the City to adequately evaluate the proposed the art work in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 17.124. If the project developer chooses to donate art, applications for art work donated to the City shall be subject to review by the Public Art Committee which shall make a recommendation whether the proposed donation is consistent with Chapter 17.124 and final acceptance by the City Council. No final approval, such as a final inspection or the a issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, for any development project (or if a multi-phased project, the final phase of a development project) that is subject to this requirement shall occur unless the public art requirement has been fulfilled to the satisfaction of the Planning Department. 11. The applicant shall sign the Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval provided by the Planning Department. The signed Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval shall be returned to the Planning Department prior to the submittal of grading/construction plans for plan check, request for a business license, and/or commencement of the approved activity. 12. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination and in conformance with Building and Safety Services Department standards, the Municipal Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department (RCFD) Standards. 13. All Double Detector Checks (DDC) and Fire Department Connections (FDC) required and/or proposed shall be installed at locations that are not within direct view or line-of-sight of the main entrance. The specific locations of each DDC and FDC shall require the review and approval of the Planning Department and Fire Construction Services/Fire Department. All Double Detector Checks (DDC) and Fire Department Connections (FDC) shall be screened behind a 4-foot high block wall. These walls shall be constructed of similar material used on-site to match the building. 14. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 15. www.CityofRC.us Page 3 of 15Printed: 2/3/2021 062 Project #: DRC2019-00371 Project Name: 8281 Utica New Office Building Location: 8281 UTICA AVE - 020806210-0000 Project Type: Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 16. Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions "Development Impact Fees Due Prior to Building Permit Issuance: (Subject to Change / Periodic Increases - Refer to current fee schedule to determine current amounts) Drainage Impact Fee Transportation Impact Fee Library Impact Fee Animal Center Impact Fee Police Impact Fee Park In-Lieu / Park Impact Fee Park Improvement Impact Fee Community & Recreation Center Impact Fee" 1. Fiber: The proposed development is slated to be included in the City’s Fiber Optic Master Plan that would provide a City owned Fiber-to-the-Premise (FTTP) infrastructure. The City will require 1-4” UG Fiber Optic dark conduit on the frontage along the project boundary. The end runs will require a 24”x36” pullbox on each end. The size, placement and location of the conduit and vaults shall be shown on the Street Improvement and/or Public Improvement Plans and subject to the Engineering Services Department's review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or final map approval, whichever comes first. On site, the City will require 1-2” UG HDPE or equal fiber optic conduit to be placed underground within a duct and structure system to be installed joint trench by the Developer per Standard Drawing 135-137 and interconnected into the City's 4" fiber optic conduit. The size, placement and location of the conduit and/or vaults shall run into the building's telecommunication room and be shown on the final dry utility onsite substructure plans and subject to the Engineering Services Department's review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or final map approval, whichever comes first. 2. Select & Edit3. Standard Conditions of Approval www.CityofRC.us Page 4 of 15Printed: 2/3/2021 063 Project #: DRC2019-00371 Project Name: 8281 Utica New Office Building Location: 8281 UTICA AVE - 020806210-0000 Project Type: Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. 4. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. 5. ** CD Information Required Prior to Sign-Off for Building Permit Prior to the issuance of building permits, if valuation is greater or equal to $100,000, a Diversion Deposit and a related administrative fee shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 65% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Applicant must identify if they are self-hauling or utilizing Burrtec prior to issuance of a building permit. Proof of diversion must be submitted to the Environmental Engineering Division within 60 days following the completion of the construction and / or demolition project. Contact Marissa Ostos, Environmental Engineering, at (909) 774-4062 for more information. Instructions and forms are available at the City's website, www.cityofrc.us, under City Hall / Engineering / Environmental Programs / Construction & Demolition Diversion Program. 6. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. The parcel shall annex into the following Districts:LMD 3B, SLD1 & SLD 6. 7. Add the following note to any private landscape plans that show street trees: “All improvements within the public right-of-way, including street trees, shall be installed per the public improvement plans.” If there is a discrepancy between the public and private plans, the street improvement plans will govern. 8. www.CityofRC.us Page 5 of 15Printed: 2/3/2021 064 Project #: DRC2019-00371 Project Name: 8281 Utica New Office Building Location: 8281 UTICA AVE - 020806210-0000 Project Type: Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: “Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet ___ (typically Sheet 1).” Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Street Name: Utica Avenue Botanical Name: Platanus acerifolia Common Name: London Plane Min. Grow Space: 40' o/c Spacing: 40-feet on center Size: Standard Trunk Qty.: to be determined during design Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 9. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. 10. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. 11. Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit Standard Conditions of Approval Required alarm systems and supervision systems are required to be in accordance with Fire District Standard 9-3. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section. 1. Plans for the alarm and/or supervision (monitoring) system are required to be submitted separately and issued a separate permit. Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to the Fire District. 2. Plans for the private, onsite fire underground water infrastructure are required to be submitted separately and issued a separate permit. Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to the Fire District. 3. www.CityofRC.us Page 6 of 15Printed: 2/3/2021 065 Project #: DRC2019-00371 Project Name: 8281 Utica New Office Building Location: 8281 UTICA AVE - 020806210-0000 Project Type: Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit Standard Conditions of Approval Plans for the sprinkler system are required to be submitted separately and issued a separate permit. Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to the Fire District. 4. The location, size, construction materials, or other features of this building and the associated project are such that adequate emergency responder radio coverage may not be achievable within the building that is proposed. It is highly recommended that a radio signal strength assessment is completed by San Bernardino County Information Services Department (ISD). Please contact Tim Trager with County ISD at 909-388-5563 or ttrager@isd.sbcounty.gov Upon substantial completion and final completion of construction, the fire code official will oversee a radio signal strength test that is in accordance with the California Fire Code. If acceptable radio coverage cannot be achieved after construction is completed, equipment necessary to increase the radio signal strength or otherwise allow adequate emergency responder radio communication will be required to be installed. 5. Fire extinguishers are required in accordance with Section 906 of the California Fire Code. Consult with the Fire Inspector for the correct type, size, and exact installation locations. 6. Fire flow information for this project is obtained from the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD). CVWD can be reached at 909-944-6000 or custserv@cvwdwater.com. 7. Fire flow is required to be in accordance with Appendix B of the California Fire Code. The Fire District has adopted the appendix without local amendments. Proof of the availability of the required fire flow must be provided to the Fire District in the form of a letter or written report dated within the past 12 months. 8. Fire sprinkler are required to be installed in accordance with Fire District Standard 9-5. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section. 9. A Knox Box key box is required in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-9. Additional boxes may be required depending on the size of the building, the location of fire protection and life safety system controls, and the operational needs of the Fire District. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section. If an installed Knox Box is available to this project or business, keys for the building/suite/unit are required to be provided to the Fire Inspector at the final inspection. 10. Roof access is required to be in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-6. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section. 11. Street address and unit/suite signage for commercial and industrial buildings are required to be in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-8. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section. 12. Identification of fire protection systems and components, fire alarm systems and components, and equipment and devices associated with fire and life safety systems is required to be in accordance with Fire District Standards 5-5 and 5-10. The Standards have been uploaded to the Documents section. 13. www.CityofRC.us Page 7 of 15Printed: 2/3/2021 066 Project #: DRC2019-00371 Project Name: 8281 Utica New Office Building Location: 8281 UTICA AVE - 020806210-0000 Project Type: Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit Standard Conditions of Approval Fire apparatus access roads (fire lanes) can be included in an engineered onsite storm water retention plan. The ponding of storm water shall not exceed a designed depth of four (4) inches in the designated fire apparatus access road(s) and the area between the fire apparatus access road(s) and the exterior walls of all normally occupied buildings. 14. Coordinate landscaping with the roof access ladder points and address signage. Landscaping cannot obstruct roof access or clear visibility of address signage from time of installation to maturity of the shrubs and trees. 15. Building and Safety Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions When the Entitlement Review is approved submit complete construction drawings including structural calculations, energy calculations, and a soils report to Building and Safety for plan review in accordance with the current edition of the California Building and Fire Codes including all local ordinances and standards which are effective at the time of Plan Check Submittal. The new structure is required to be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers per the CBC and Current RCFPD Ordinance. Disabled access for the site and building must be in accordance to the State of California and ADA regulations. To be considered an accessible stairway stairways shall have a clear width of 48" between handrails. All required ground floor exits shall be accessible to the public way. Doors in series shall have a 4' clear between them in there open position. 1. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code and/or the California Residential Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 1. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 2. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Engineering Services Department prior to the issuance of building permits. 3. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit. 4. www.CityofRC.us Page 8 of 15Printed: 2/3/2021 067 Project #: DRC2019-00371 Project Name: 8281 Utica New Office Building Location: 8281 UTICA AVE - 020806210-0000 Project Type: Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. All dust control sign(s) shall be located outside of the public right of way. 5. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Engineering Services Department for review, the rough grading plan shall be a separate plan submittal and permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 6. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Grading and Drainage Plan shall show the accessibility path from the public right of way and the accessibility parking stalls to the building doors in conformance with the current adopted California Building Code. All accessibility ramps shall show sufficient detail including gradients, elevations, and dimensions and comply with the current adopted California Building Code. 7. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on-site construction where possible, and shall provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 8. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the grading plan shall show that all manufactured slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way, permitted line, or the adjacent private property. All slope offsets shall meet the requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 9. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the grading and drainage plan shall show the maximum parking stall gradient at 7 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current adopted California Building Code. 10. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond project boundary. 11. This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 12. www.CityofRC.us Page 9 of 15Printed: 2/3/2021 068 Project #: DRC2019-00371 Project Name: 8281 Utica New Office Building Location: 8281 UTICA AVE - 020806210-0000 Project Type: Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over-excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 13. All roof drainage flowing to the public right of way (Utica Avenue) must drain under the sidewalk through a parkway culvert approved by the Engineering Department. This shall be shown on both the grading and drainage plan and Engineering Services Department required plans. 14. Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, the permitted grading plan (or architectural site plan) set shall show in each of the typical sections and the plan view show how the separations between the building exterior and exterior ground surface meet the requirements of Sections CBC1804.3/CRC R401.3, CBC2304.11.2.2/CRC R317.1(2) and CBC2512.1.2/CRC R703.6.2.1 of the current adopted California Building Code/Residential Code. 15. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall obtain a signed and notarized letter from the adjacent property owner(s) for ALL work proposed on the adjacent property. The letter shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set. The letter shall show on either the title sheet or a detail sheet of the grading and drainage plan set. 16. Prior to approval of the project-specific storm water quality management plan, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer, or his designee, a precise grading plan showing the location and elevations of existing topographical features, and showing the location and proposed elevations of proposed structures and drainage of the site. 17. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Engineering Services Department for review and approval for on-site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. The report shall contain water surface profile gradient calculations for all storm drain pipes 12-inches and larger in diameter. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. In addition, the project specific drainage study shall provide inlet calculations showing the proper sizing of the water quality management plan storm water flows into the proposed structural storm water treatment devices. 18. www.CityofRC.us Page 10 of 15Printed: 2/3/2021 069 Project #: DRC2019-00371 Project Name: 8281 Utica New Office Building Location: 8281 UTICA AVE - 020806210-0000 Project Type: Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage easements prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 19. Roof water is not permitted to flow over the public parkway and shall be directed to an under parkway culvert per City of Rancho Cucamonga requirements prior to issuance of a grading permit. 20. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the latest adopted California Plumbing Code. Private storm drain improvements shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan. 21. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy or final sign off by the Building Inspector the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) storm water treatment devices and best management practices (BMP). 22. Prior to approval of the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), the WQMP shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 23. The Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (PWQMP) has been deemed “Acceptable”. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit a final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official. 24. Prior to approval of the final project-specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project-specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted “San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans”. Note: As this project has been previously graded and the site soils have been compacted for building pads and parking lot purposes, the use of the Custom Soil Resource Report for San Bernardino County Southwestern Part by the United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resource Conservation Service for natural soils is not acceptable for soil groundwater infiltration rates. 25. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout “Information for Grading Plans and Permit”. 26. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga’s “Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan” shall be submitted for review and approval by the Engineering Services Department then recorded with the County Recorder’s Office. 27. The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the structural storm water treatment devices, commonly referred to as BMPs, to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 28. The land/property owner shall follow the inspection and maintenance requirements of the approved project specific Water Quality Management Plan and shall provide a copy of the inspection reports on a biennial basis to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. 29. www.CityofRC.us Page 11 of 15Printed: 2/3/2021 070 Project #: DRC2019-00371 Project Name: 8281 Utica New Office Building Location: 8281 UTICA AVE - 020806210-0000 Project Type: Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval A final project-specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be approved by the Building and Safety Director, or his designee, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga’s “Memorandum of Storm Water Quality Management Plan” shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit or any building permit. 30. The Site and Drainage Plan in the final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan shall show the locations of all roof downspout drains. if required for storm water quality purposes, the downspouts shall include filters. 31. The final project-specific water quality management plan (WQMP) shall include executed maintenance agreements along with the maintenance guidelines for all proprietary structural storm water treatment devices (BMP’s). In the event the applicant cannot get the proprietary device maintenance agreements executed prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant is required to submit a letter to be included within the WQMP document, and scanned and pasted onto the Site and Drainage Plan which states that prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy with applicant shall enter into a contract for the maintenance of the proprietary storm water treatment device. If the proprietary storm water treatment device is part of a residential subdivision, prior to the sale of the residential lot, the developer shall include maintenance agreement(s) as part of the sale of the residential lot to the buyer. A copy of the maintenance agreements to be included in the sale of the property shall be included within the WQMP document. 32. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and approval of the project specific water quality management plan all private storm water catch basin inlets shall include insert filters to capture those pollutants of concern as addressed in the in the final project-specific water quality management plan (WQMP). At a minimum catch basin insert filters to capture trash and other floating debris. All catch basin insert filters shall be maintained on a regular basis as described in the “Inspection and Maintenance Responsibility for Post Construction BMP” section of the final project-specific water quality management plan. 33. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Project-Specific Water Quality Management Plan shall include a completed copy of “Worksheet H: Factor of Safety and Design Infiltration Worksheet” located in Appendix D “Section VII – Infiltration Rate Evaluation Protocol and Factor of Safety Recommendations, …” of the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans. The infiltration study shall include the Soil Engineer’s recommendations for Appendix D, Table VII.3: Suitability Assessment Related Considerations for Infiltration Facility Safety Factors”. 34. The subject project, shall accept all existing off-site storm water drainage flows and safely convey those flows through or around the project site. If existing off-site storm water drainage flows mix with any on-site storm water drainage flows, then the off-site storm water drainage flows shall be treated with the on-site storm water drainage flows for storm water quality purposes, prior to discharging the storm water drainage flows from the project site. 35. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy by the Building Official, or his designee, the civil engineer of record shall file a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Post Construction Storm Water Treatment Devices As-Built Certificate with the Environmental Programs Coordinator, City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Services Department. 36. www.CityofRC.us Page 12 of 15Printed: 2/3/2021 071 Project #: DRC2019-00371 Project Name: 8281 Utica New Office Building Location: 8281 UTICA AVE - 020806210-0000 Project Type: Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval GROUND WATER PROTECTION: Prior to approval of the final project specific water quality management plan (WQMP), the WQMP document shall meet the requirements of the State Water Resources Control Board Order No. R8-2010-0036 (NPDES No. CAS 618036), the San Bernardino County Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Separation (MS4) Permit reads: Section XI.D(Water Quality Management Plan Requirements).8(Groundwater Protection): Treatment Control BMPs utilizing infiltration [exclusive of incidental infiltration and BMPs not designed to primarily function as infiltration devices (such as grassy swales, detention basins, vegetated buffer strips, constructed wetlands, etc.)] must comply with the following minimum requirements to protect groundwater: a. Use of structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause or contribute to an exceedance of ground water quality objectives. b. Source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration should be evaluated prior to infiltration. c. Adequate pretreatment of runoff prior to infiltration shall be required in gas stations and large commercial parking lots. (NOTE: The State Water Quality Control Board defines a large commercial parking lot as ‘100,000 sq. ft. or more of commercial development to include parking lot (with 100 or more vehicle traffics), OR, by means of 5,000sqft or more of allowable space designated for parking purposes’). d. Unless adequate pre-treatment of runoff is provided prior to infiltration structural infiltration treatment BMPs must not be used for areas of industrial or light industrial activity{77}, areas subject to high vehicular traffic (25,000 or more daily traffic); car washes; fleet storage areas; nurseries; or any other high threat to water quality land uses or activities. e. Class V injection wells or dry wells must not be placed in areas subject to vehicular{78} repair or maintenance activities{79}, such as an auto body repair shop, automotive repair shop, new and used car dealership, specialty repair shop (e.g., transmission and muffler repair shop) or any facility that does any vehicular repair work. f. Structural infiltration BMP treatment shall not be used at sites that are known to have soil and groundwater contamination. g. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall be located at least 100 feet horizontally from any water supply wells. h. The vertical distance from the bottom of any infiltration structural treatment BMP to the historic high groundwater mark shall be at least 10-feet. Where the groundwater basins do not support beneficial uses, this vertical distance criteria may be reduced, provided groundwater quality is maintained. i. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause a nuisance or pollution as defined in Water Code Section 13050. 37. www.CityofRC.us Page 13 of 15Printed: 2/3/2021 072 Project #: DRC2019-00371 Project Name: 8281 Utica New Office Building Location: 8281 UTICA AVE - 020806210-0000 Project Type: Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval NONRESIDENTIAL MANDATORY MEASURES – CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE – Prior to the issuance of any building permit the applicant shall comply with Section 5.106.1 (Storm water pollution prevention) of the current adopted California Green Building Standards Code: Newly construction projects and additions which disturb less than one acre of land shall prevent the pollution of stormwater runoff from the construction activities through one or more of the following measures: 5.106.1.1 Local Ordinance – Comply with a lawfully enacted stormwater management and/or erosion control ordinance. 5.106.1.2 Best Management Practices (BMP) – Prevent the loss of soil through wind or water erosion by implementing an effective combination of erosion and sediment control and good housekeeping BMP. 1. Soil loss BMP that should be considered for implementation as appropriate for each project include, but are not limited to, the following: a. Scheduling construction activity. b. Preservation of natural features, vegetation and soil. c. Drainage swales or lined ditches to control stormwater flow. d. Mulching or hydroseeding to stabilize disturbed soils. e. Erosion control to protect slopes. f. Protection of storm drain inlets (gravel bags or catch basin inserts). g. Perimeter sediment control (perimeter silt fence, fiber rolls). h. Sediment trap or sediment basin to retain sediment on site. i. Stabilized construction exits. j. Wind erosion control. k. Other soil loss BMP acceptable to the enforcing agency. 2. Good housekeeping BMP to manage construction equipment, materials and wastes that should be considered for implementation as appropriate for each project include, but are not limited to, the following: a. Material handling and waste management. b. Building materials stockpile management. c. Management of washout areas (concrete, paints, stucco, etc.). d. Control of vehicle/equipment fueling to contractors staging area. e. Vehicle and equipment cleaning performed off site. f. Spill prevention and control. g. Other housekeeping BMP acceptable to the enforcing agency (City of Rancho Cucamonga). 38. www.CityofRC.us Page 14 of 15Printed: 2/3/2021 073 Project #: DRC2019-00371 Project Name: 8281 Utica New Office Building Location: 8281 UTICA AVE - 020806210-0000 Project Type: Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval NONRESIDENTIAL MANDATORY MEASURES – CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE – Prior to the issuance of any building permit the applicant shall comply with Section 5.106.10 (Grading and paving) of the current adopted California Green Building Standards Code: Construction plans shall indicate how site grading, or a drainage system will manage all surface water flows to keep water from entering buildings. Examples of methods to manage surface water include, but are not limited to, the following: 1. Swales. 2. Water collection and disposal systems. 3. French drains. 4. Water retention gardens. 5. Other water measures which keep surface water away from buildings and aid in groundwater recharge. Exception: Additions and alterations not altering the drainage path. 39. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall show on the site plan and the permitted grading plan set for non-residential projects the designated parking for clean air vehicles per the current adopted California Green Building Standards Code, section 5.106.5.2. 40. Prior to issuance of a grading permit for non-residential projects the applicant shall show on the electrical plans and the permitted grading plan set the location for a future installation of an Electric Vehicle (EV) charging station/parking area per the current adopted California Green Building Standards Code, section 5.106.5.3. 41. www.CityofRC.us Page 15 of 15Printed: 2/3/2021 074 RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission should consider the current Public Art Committee membership and by minute action, either affirm the existing member, which is Commissioner Bryan Dopp, or select a new member if he would rather not continue to be on Committee. His term on the Committee would be for 2 years (February 2021 - February 2023) if affirmed. BACKGROUND: The Planning Commission appoints members of various committees in July (of the year in when that is required to occur). However, staff has learned that the duration of the Public Arts Committee members’ terms begin and end in February of the applicable years. Therefore, staff requests that the Planning Commission adjust the appointment dates for this Committee accordingly. Staff notes to the Commission that this Committee functions independently from the Planning Commission and therefore adheres to separate procedures established by the City. Public Art Committee: Duties of the subject Committee include advising the City Council regarding the selection, purpose, placement, and maintenance of art installed by the City or on City property, and expenditures from the City of Rancho Cucamonga Public Art Trust Fund. The Committee meets once a quarter. The Public Art Committee is composed of five members appointed by the City Council as follows: (i) one member of the Planning Commission; (ii) one member of the Community and Arts Foundation; and (iii) three members of the public appointed based on relevant work experience, trade, industry, or expertise. The Planning Commission selects new or affirms the existing Commission representative from amongst themselves. Currently, Commissioner Bryan Dopp is serving on the Public Arts Committee. DATE: February 10, 2021 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Planning Director INITIATED BY: Elizabeth Thornhill, Executive Assistant II SUBJECT: RENEW APPOINTMENT TO PUBLIC ARTS COMMITTEE TO ALIGN WITH THE OFFICIAL TERM FOR THIS COMMITTEE. 075