The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2021-05-26 Agenda Packet CITY OF ■ . ■ * ■ Historic Preservation Commission and Planning Commission Agenda May 26, 2021 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 7:00 p.m. PURSUANT TO GOVERNOR GAVIN NEWSOM'S EXECUTIVE ORDER N-29-20 THIS MEETING WILL BE HELD AS A TELECONFERENCE MEETING In response to the Governor's Executive Orders, the San Bernardino County Department of Public Health requirements, and to ensure the health and safety of our residents by limiting contact that could spread the COVID-19 virus, there will be no members of the public in attendance at the Planning Commission Meetings. Members of the Planning Commission and staff will participate in this meeting via teleconference. In place of in-person attendance, members of the public can observe and offer comments at this meeting via Zoom: VIEW MEETING VIA ZOOM APP OR ZOOM.COM AT: zoom.us/join using Webinar ID: 910 3444 1831 -or- YOU CAN DIAL-IN USING YOUR PHONE UNITED STATES: + 1 (669) 900-6833 Access Code: 910 3444 1831 A. Call to Order and Pledge of Allegiance B. Public Communications This is the time and place for the general public to address the Commission on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. The Commission may not discuss any issue not included on the Agenda but set the matter for a subsequent meeting. C. Consent Calendar C1. Consideration to adopt Special Study Session Minutes of April 28, 2021. C2. Consideration to adopt Regular Meeting Minutes of April 28, 2021. C3. Consideration to adopt Special Study Session Minutes of May 12, 2021. C4. Consideration to adopt Regular Meeting Minutes of May 12, 2021. C5. FY21/22 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) - Determination of Conformance with the General Plan. C6. LOCATED AT THE EAST TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD BETWEEN EAST AVENUE AND CHOCTAW PLACE — W&W LAND DESIGN CONSULTANTS — Site plan review of a proposal to subdivide a vacant parcel of approximately 146,429 square feet (3.36 acres) into five residential (5) lots in the Very Low (VL) Residential District that includes a Variance to reduce the required lot depth on two (2) lots and a minor exception for wall height fora project site located in the Etiwanda Specific Plan; Tentative Tract Map, Variance & Minor Exception - APN: 0225-181- 73. A Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts has been prepared for consideration (SUBTT20152, DRC2019-00786, DRC2019-00787). (Planning Commission directed staff to bring back the Resolution of Approval - continued from May 12, 2021 PC Meeting.) C7. LOCATED BETWEEN EAST AVENUE AND GOLDEN LOCK PLACE APPROXIMATELY 400 FEET SOUTH OF BANYAN STREET — MANNING HOMES -A request to subdivide 10.24 acres of land into 17 lots including the Design Review of 17 single-family residences, a Minor Exception for increased wall heights and a Tree Removal Permit to remove onsite trees for a project site in the Very Low (VL) Residential District (.1 - 2 Dwelling Units per Acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan and the Equestrian Overlay District. Tentative Tract Map, Design Review, Minor Exception & Tree Removal Permit; APNs: 0225-191-09 and -17. A Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts was prepared for consideration (SUBTT20334, DRC2020-00139, DRC2020-00141, DRC2020-00140). (Planning Commission directed staff to bring back the Resolution of Approval - continued from May 12, 2021 PC Meeting.) D. Public Hearings D1. LOCATED AT 10839 CARRIAGE DRIVE — MOLINAR DESIGN, INC - A request for a Hillside Design Review to consider the construction of a new 6,871 square foot two-story single-family residence with an attached 4-car garage on a 20,724 square foot lot within the Very Low (VL) Residential District within the Hillside Overlay District and Equestrian Overlay District. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, this project qualifies for a Class 3 Exemption. APN: 1074-531-09 Hillside Design Review (DRC2019-00973). (Continued from May 12, 2021 PC Meeting.) D2. MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA—A request to amend Title 17 (Development Code) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to modify administrative procedures, establish new zoning districts, amend land uses and definitions and create new development standards for industrial development. This item is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA guidelines under CEQA guidelines Section 15061(b)(3). This item will be forwarded to City Council for final action. (DRC2021-00170) HPC/PC Regular Meeting Agenda — May 26, 2021 Page 2 of 3 E. Director Announcements F. Commission Announcements G. Adjournment TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. For each of the items listed under"PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS", the public will be provided an opportunity to speak. To address the Planning Commission via Zoom App, click the "Raise Hand" button when the item you wish to comment on is being discussed. On Zoom via phone, you can also raise your hand by pressing star *, then 9 when the item you wish to comment on is being discussed. Comments will be limited to 5 minutes per individual. If a large number of individuals wish to speak on an item, the Chairman may limit the time to 3 minutes in order to provide an opportunity for more people to be heard. Speakers will be alerted when their time is up, and no further comments will be permitted. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under"PUBLIC COMMENTS." As an alternative to participating in the meeting, you may submit comments in writing to Elizabeth.Thornhill@cityofrc.us by 12:OOpm on the date of the meeting. Written comments will be distributed to the Commissioners and included in the record. AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are available at www.CitvofRC.us. APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of$3,206 for all decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting,please contact the Planning Department at(909)477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. I, Elizabeth Thornhill, Executive Assistant of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on Thursday, May 20, 2021, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. HPC/PC Regular Meeting Agenda — May 26, 2021 Page 3of3 Historic Preservation Commission and Planning Commission STUDY SESSION Agenda May 12, 2021 MINUTES Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 4:00 p.m. The Special Study Session meeting of the Historic Presentation Commission and Planning Commission was held on May 12, 2021. The meeting was called to order by the Chairman at 4:00 p.m. A. Roll Call Planning Commission present: Chairman Tony Guglielmo, Vice Chair Oaxaca, Commissioner Bryan Dopp, Commissioner Tony Morales, Commissioner Diane Williams. Staff Present: Matt Burris, Deputy City Manager; Nicholas Ghirelli, City Attorney; Anne McIntosh, Planning Director; Dat Tran, Assistant Planner, David Eoff, Senior Planner; Mike Smith, Principal Planner, Jason Welday, Engineering Director; Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner; Mena Abdul-Ahad, Assistant Planner; Vincent Acuna, Associate Planner; Jennifer Nakamura, Management Analyst II; Flavio Nunez, Management Analyst II; Paige Garcia, Management Aide; Griffin Sproul, Planning Technician. B. Public Communications Chairman Guglielmo opened for public communications. Stephanie Clark, Attorney Nossaman LLP, representing SCE regarding the city's General Plan Update. Objecting to the Southeast Industrial Quadrant Roadway Network Assessment (SEIQ Assessment). Stating the City's SEIQ Assessment is improper, unsupported, makes no legal or practical sense and will ultimately expose the City to litigation as it pertains to proposing roads through the SEC Property that cannot be built. Requesting the City reconsider the locations of those proposed streets. Chairman Guglielmo hearing no other comments closed communications. C. General Business C1. Discussion of Public Draft General Plan Update Matt Burris, Deputy City Manager, presented the Planning Commissioners a PowerPoint on the Public Draft General Plan Update. (Copy of file) Before starting, Mr. Burris clarified to the Attorney with SCE, Ms. Clark, stating this is not pertaining to the General Plan Amendment the City was considering several months back to add a series of local and collective streets to our street network. It is a separate process and it's being handled through a different path in terms of Industrial Moratorium. He said that General Plan Amendment has been abandoned as an effort by the City. After Matt Burris's presentation, Chairman Guglielmo asked the Commission if there were any comments. Nick Ghirelli, City Attorney, stated there are roads identified in the General Plan that you just saw, those roads will be environmentally reviewed pursuant to an EIR under CEQA. There is not going to be an addendum to an EIR. It will not require SCE to remove electrical infostructure. He said this is the vision for the city and a high-level planning document that all future land usage decision will be based on going forward. Commissioner Morales mentioned one of the things he saw is the activity by Staff involving the public. They were professional and that is how they came up with the all-inclusive General Plan. Good economic sense behind it. He said you see a lot of cities here in California that did not plan and struggled with their budget. That puts us in a position of strength going forward. It will help us build on our successes that we already have in place to become the economics of the central hub of the Inland Empire. He is very proud of it and looks forward to the implementation of the strategy next. Commissioner Oaxaca stated it was great to see in detail all the work staff has been doing along with their consulting partners to really sit back and look at the City of Rancho Cucamonga with a new perspective. He said it is timely that we are going through the General Plan Update process at this time with the status of the city. It is an important opportunity for our city, if you look for the silver lining, to see how we can incorporate into our decision making some of these new realities and expectations that our community has. Commissioner Oaxaca said he noticed probably maybe two, three key things that he can tell staff has looked at that has really somehow redefined the vision for the city. This is really the plan to intentionally take the city in a new direction, planning for the future. He asked if staff could give him some two or three new things the team has taken into account that has really become part of the foundation for this Draft General Plan Update. Matt Burris answered he would say that in a lot of ways the General Plan, that we have coming out. is a reflection over a lot of ideas, a refinement in a lot of ways the city has been working on for a very longtime. For example, the current General Plan includes mixed-use. The Arte for example, it's not the first mixed-use building, we have many in the city and have been built over a course in the last couple of decades. Matt Burris said one of the things we have found in putting that General Plan into practice is our current General Plan often times lacks specificity, helping to explain the idea, as an example, how we take the idea of having a mixed-use Wilshire Blvd. type district on Haven. Or we have a mixed-use Colorado Blvd. type of environment on Foothill. Or how Victoria Gardens becomes a downtown. We have had those ideas in place for a very long time. One of the things that this General Plan does that is really new is it helps convey and map out how we get from that big idea to the physical place we are trying to create. With that said, one of the news things that brings us a lot of clarification and expectation and the how of getting there. Having a town center above the 210 was something identified in the 1982 General Plan. The southeast industrial area and evolving that into a modern industrial district is certainly a new idea. That was going to remain an area of heavy industry far into the future. He said this General Plan puts a greater emphasis on creating a downtown type place on Victoria Gardens and the epic center area and connecting down through the area of the Rancho Cucamonga station. That future transit hub provides tons of opportunity and having Rancho be the gateway that connects Southern California to Las Vegas is a big deal. One that none of us ever anticipated as an opportunity. Another idea you will see in the General Plan in terms of new is a greater emphasis on reflecting that our street and roads do not make sense to have one size fits all. We are reflecting this General Plan how State Law with regard to complete streets has changed, and evolved but we are also saying there are lots of different ways of getting around and in order to have a really good robust transportation network, we are going to identify some HPC/PC Study Session Meeting MINUTES— May 12, 2021 Page 2 of 4 FINAL streets prioritize some types of mode and identify other streets prioritizing other types of mode. A very new concept here. Anne Mcintosh shared the theme of requiring "connectivity" between projects. Trying to find ways for people to get from one project to your neighboring community without having to walk around the block to find a path. Finding new ways to connect people, make things more pedestrian, and keep projects from becoming disconnected islands unto themselves. That is one of the bigger concepts we injected in here. Commissioner Williams mentioned Mr. Burris General Plan presentation was very easy to understand. She spent a lot of years listening to lots of General Plans ideas in the past and to see now taking this by listening to the community, she knows was difficult, but it paid off. What you have you know now this is what they want. These things have been casually mentioned before we really should figure out how to turn Victoria Gardens into downtown. Let's look and see what we designed for this area. We already have done all the hard work. Now whatever pieces of the puzzle come through, if they fit fine, if not put them somewhere else where they do fit. Commissioner Williams expressed her excitement by some of the things she heard. So many pieces, we put together a whole lot of things, now we are going to start to fill in the puzzle. She said it's wonderful to have the security of knowing you are taking the citizens views. We all kind of thought people wanted activity centers but when the people come out and said, "we want activity centers", that justifies we are putting the extra effort into making sure it happens where it should. The epic center, the transit center, we have so much opportunity in this city to make things happen. She looks forward to reading a good book, your General Plan. The presentation was excellent. Matt Burris expressed that when she does sit down to read it like a good book, she enjoys it. One of the things we are excited about with this General Plan, which is going to be a big ship, is that we are recognizing it is not all going to be the same. We are really trying to put an emphasis recognizing for example, we have very different neighborhoods here in the city. We have some that are really lovely rural areas, suburban track and some growing up to be new urban areas. We have such a great diversity and we are really trying to put emphasis in this General Plan. Matt Burris mentioned recognizing we have different places here in the city and we are not going to try to make them all the same. There is so much value in having different places. We are trying to be clearer in saying that there is a place for everything. Commissioners Williams stated in 20+ years it will come to fruition and be well worth the effort. She feels good about it. She said now we will have a "Bible" to go to and say the word of Rancho Cucamonga is this... you are off to a great start. Commissioner Dopp stated his initial take away on all this is what a visionary document it is. A lot of things maybe have been discussed city wide but never been implemented. He knows that right away one of the big takeaways with areas in the city having different characters. He said it's obvious that there is an element in our city, no matter who doesn't want to see the city change, believe it or not to some extent the General Plan recognizes that reality. Commissioner Dopp said you look at the initial land use designations trying the best to reflect as much as possible the rural nature of the northern part of the city. Or when people look at numbers and at a map and see a radical change, you realize some of that change is really necessary in some places. It's out of step with the character of the neighborhood. That is one of the things he really appreciated about the General Plan, it tries as much as possible to give it all the changes we see legally and economically in the 21$1 Century to recognize the Country is obviously going to be in a different place, in the State and City as well. He said HPC/PC Study Session Meeting MINUTES— May 12, 2021 Page 3 of 4 FINAL you hit it with recognition of creating value from an economic sense for the city and he sees it's really deliberate in this plan across the board. It's a great step forward. Trying to recognize as well through the plan. We don't know all the details of course yet this is an overview discussion. Recognizing that there is at least an attempt to make sure when we do build, we build deliberately and with purpose. Commissioner Dopp mentioned there is a real reason behind it not just economically but as you mentioned connectivity. There is a real desire to see Rancho develop as a real focal hub as a region. There is really a tremendous amount of work to be done. To start things off, it does a great job hitting on major things we have talked about in the last year. He said there is always a fear when we look at change and when people are looking at different parts of town, sometimes there is a gut reaction to go back and we don't want to see these things change, but in some of these parts of town they need the change for the better. We look at the southwest part of town. We look at the industrial part of town where that is a lot of negative environmental impact that have occurred over time. There is a clear recognition to try and rectify that to create a better city for everybody and that is what he appreciates. Matt Burris appreciated what was said and went over Focus Area 5: Cucamonga Town Center slide. Recognizing we can help deliver what the community has asked for. Chairman Guglielmo expressed the staff report was great and the focus on the value per acre really illustrated the potential we have here in Rancho Cucamonga. He said having so many resources and so much going for us to take to the next level over the next 10-20 years is an opportunity we cannot let slip past. This plan really addresses a lot of that. It's extremely visionary in the sense even the road work connectivity is really good. D. Adjournment to Regular Planning Commission Meeting at 7:00 p.m. Meeting was adjourned at 5:38 p.m. Respectfully submitted, �I,Zj e C�,w le:i LiL Eliz th Thornhill Executive Assistant, Planning Department Approved: May 26th, 2021 — HPC/PC Meeting. HPC/PC Study Session Meeting MINUTES— May 12, 2021 Page 4 of 4 FINAL Historic Preservation Commission and Planning Commission Agenda May 12, 2021 MINUTES Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 7:00 p.m. The regular meeting of the Historic Presentation Commission and Planning Commission was held on May 12, 2021. The meeting was called to order by the Chairman at 7:00 p.m. A. Roll Call Planning Commission present: Chairman Tony Guglielmo, Vice Chair Oaxaca, Commissioner Bryan Dopp, Commissioner Tony Morales and Commissioner Diane Williams. Staff Present: Nicholas Ghirelli, City Attorney; Anne McIntosh, Planning Director; Dat Tran, Assistant Planner; David Eoff, Senior Planner; Mike Smith, Principal Planner; Jason Welday, Engineering Director; Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner; Sean McPherson, Senior Planner; Mena Abdul-Ahad, Assistant Planner; Vincent Acuna, Associate Planner. B. Public Communications Chairman Guglielmo opened for public communications and hearing no comment, closed communications. C. Consent Calendar- None D. Public Hearings D1. LOCATED NORTH OF THE 210 FREEWAY AND EAST OF EAST AVENUE AT THE EASTERLY EXTENSION OF WILSHIRE DRIVE AND COPLEY DRIVE - M8•A HOLDINGS, LLC - A request to construct 10 single-family homes on a previously approved Tract Map (SUBTT19917) within the Very Low (VL) Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located north of the 210 Freeway and east of East Avenue at the easterly extension of Wilshire Drive and Copley Drive; APNs 0226-572-01 to -10. Design Review File Number: DRC2019-00558. Vincent Acuna, Associate Planner, presented Commissioners with a Staff Report and presentation (copy on file). Chairman Guglielmo asked the Commission if there were any comments for staff on this Public Hearing item. Commissioner Dopp asked about the sound wall and giving it any consideration 6 ft. wall level. Vincent Acuna answered yes and working with property owner. With no further discussion from Commissioners, Chairman Guglielmo opened public hearing. With no more comments from the Public, Chairman Guglielmo closed public hearing. All Commissioners concur and are in support of the project. Motion by Commissioner Williams, second by Commissioner Dopp. Motion carried 5-0 D2. LOCATED AT 10839 CARRIAGE DRIVE — MOLINAR DESIGN, INC - A request to construction a new 6,871 square foot two-story single-family residence with an attached 4-car garage on a 18,924 square foot lot within the Very Low(VL) Residential District within the Hillside Overlay District and Equestrian Overlay District - APN: 1074-531-09. Hillside Design Review File Number: DRC2019-00973. Mena Abdul-Ahad, Assistant Planner, presented Commissioners with a Staff Report and presentation (copy on file). Chairman Guglielmo opened public hearing. Ryochum, resident, lives at 10826 Carriage Drive, asked if HOA is in conformance with debris control. Mena Abdul-Ahad answered yes, it was approved by HOA the dust control. Refer to Applicant. Erick Molinar, Applicant, responded yes, followed typical standard practice. Sherie Garcia, residents, lives at 10827 Carriage Drive, is concerned about their view. Mena Abdul-Ahad mentioned HOA reviewed elevation and meet minimal requirements. Consistent with homes already existing. Ryochum stated HOA not aware and not sure it went through HOA. Sherie Garcia stated it's the first-time hearing about this. Want confirmation it went through to HOA. Mena Abdul-Ahad stated she received letter from applicant on the HOA approval. Commissioners concur there is inconsistency with the plans and renderings. Stating it's an important step. Requesting to defer action and come back with requested records. With no more comments from the Public, Chairman Guglielmo motioned public hearing will remain open. Motion by Commissioner Williams, second by Commissioner Dopp. Motion carried 5-0 to continue Item D2 to May 26'" PC meeting. D3. LOCATED IN THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AT THE EAST TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD BETWEEN EAST AVENUE AND CHOCTAW PLACE — W&W LAND DESIGN CONSULTANTS —Site plan review of a proposal to subdivide a vacant parcel of approximately 146,429 square feet (3.36 acres) into five residential (5) lots in the Very Low (VL) Residential District that includes a Variance to reduce the required lot depth on two (2) lots and a minor exception for wall height for a project site -APN: 0225-181-73. A Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts has been prepared for consideration. - TENTATIVE TRACT MAP, VARIANCE, AND MINOR EXCEPTION File Numbers: SUBTT20152, DRC2019-00786, DRC2019-00787. HPC/PC Regular Meeting MINUTES—May 12, 2021 Page 2 of 8 FINAL Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner, presented Commissioners with a Staff Report and presentation (copy on file). Chairman Guglielmo opened public hearing. Jim Freeman and Bruce Hemlock, Choctaw residents, expressed concerns about wall height. Tabe van der Zwaag stated the wall height is 6 ft. With no more comments from the Public, Chairman Guglielmo closed public hearing. Motion by Vice Chair Oaxaca, second by Commissioner Dopp. Motion carried 5-0 Planning Commission directed staff to bring the resolution of approval to May 261" PC meeting. D4. LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF EAST AVENUE AND SOUTH OF BANYAN STREET — MANNING HOMES - A request to subdivide 10.24 acres of land into 17 lots including the Design Review of 17 single-family residences, a Minor Exception for increased wall heights and a Tree Removal Permit to remove onsite trees for a project site in the Very Low (VL) Residential District (.1 - 2 Dwelling Units per Acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan and the Equestrian Overlay District; APNs: 0225-191-09 and -17. A Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts was prepared for consideration. Environmental Assessment and Tentative Tract Map, Design Review, Minor Exception and Tree Removal Permit File Numbers: SUBTT20334, DRC2020- 00139, DRC2020-00141, DRC2020-00140. Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner, presented Commissioners with a Staff Report and presentation (copy on file). Chairman Guglielmo asked the Commission if there were any comments for staff on this Public Hearing item. Commissioner Williams requesting creative artwork near bike racks. Jim Manning, Applicant, stated they will work on creating Art design at bike racks even though exempt from Art fee. With no further discussion from Commissioners, Chairman Guglielmo opened public hearing. With no comments from the Public, Chairman Guglielmo closed public hearing. Motion by Commission Dopp, second by Vice Chair Oaxaca. Motion carried 5-0 Planning Commission directed staff to bring the resolution of approval to May 261" PC meeting. E. General Business El. LOCATED AT 8768 ARCHIBALD AVENUE - ORBIS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS -A request to develop a new commercial building with a service station and convenience store within the General Industrial (GI) District; APN: 0209-032-35. File Numbers: SUBTPM20164; DRC2020-00138; and DRC2020-00087. HPC/PC Regular Meeting MINUTES— May 12, 2021 Page 3 of 8 FINAL Sean McPherson, Senior Planner, presented Commissioners with a Staff Report and presentation (copy on file). During his presentation, he announced exciting news that the applicant agreed to design the building to Lead Silver Standards. He explained "Lead Silver Standards" shows a dedication and a commitment to environmentally and sustainable development. He said this would be the first Lead Silver Certified 7/11 in the State of California, which has been included in the Conditions of Approval. Note: Change to the following Condition of Approvals: #3, #8, #20, 21 (refer to the revised COA for detailed information). Chairman Guglielmo asked the Commission if there were any comments for staff on this project. Commissioner Dopp asked regarding concentration service stations, is it a good planning principal to put so many gas stations in a specific part of town. Anne McIntosh commented that the moratorium had an exception for projects that receive a building permit within 6 months of the date that it was adopted. She said there was a recognition that some projects might go forward if they are able to meet the deadline. Commissioner Dopp asked about types of services and buildings are in an area. Nicholas Ghirelli, City Attorney, mentioned there are cases that have said there is a legitimate planning purpose and exercise of the City's police power to limit the number of similar types of uses next to each other if the City is concerned that the number of uses will start to compete against each other in such a way the competition will cause closures and that eventually causes blight in the community. It's that blight position caused by too much competition that could potentially be a legitimate planning concern to weigh in on as a Planning Commission. Commissioner Dopp mentioned in the scope of our expectation and drive to create equity in southwest Cucamonga, his concern and considerations about a key parcel of land on a key street looking forward in terms of the General Plan is whether we believe this is the best use for this land from a land use perspective. Sean McPherson responded that staff's recommendation is based on the application in front of them today. He said in terms of broader conversation regarding gas stations and types of uses should be allowed on major corridors, most visible parcels, that broader question is why staff is working towards further analyzing service stations. For example, why there is currently a moratorium to address those broader holistic questions. The applicant has heard the concerns and responded to the Commissions questions and concerns to the point where staff feels we recommend approval of this project. Anne McIntosh stated when we had our overview of the General Plan Update, we talked specifically this being in the middle of a focus area for Cucamonga town center. She said you probably are recalling some of the comments we made about the importance of this neighborhood and desire to have smaller businesses that serve the neighborhood. Creating that walkability connections and opportunities creating employment. She said it's valid to take that into consideration. As this being a key corner for the future of Cucamonga Town Center. It's a valid discussion to have. Matt Burris mentioned whether or not there should be any concerns about over concentration of service station is a legitimate one. Commissioner Dopp asked about conditions and food. He said his understanding is there really is no hard requirement that 7/11 maintain the fresh food options. He asked is this something that Planning entertained or we can, in the back end, in a condition by adding a Healthy RC requirement. HPC/PC Regular Meeting MINUTES— May 12, 2021 Page 4 of 8 FINAL Nicholas Ghirelli stated he thought the applicant already agreed to do that. Yes, we can condition that. Commissioner Morales asked if there will be bright lights over the gas pumps. Sean McPherson answered no. In conversation with the applicant, the tri-color band surrounding the gas station canopy will not be illuminated. Commissioner Williams stated she is fine with it. With no further discussion from Commissioners, Chairman Guglielmo announced even though this is not a public hearing, he opened for public comments. Grant Ross, Orbis Real Estate Partners, Applicant, is available to answer questions. Commissioner Dopp asked what unique options 7/11 will be offering in the type of food they are putting in their store. As well as on a percentage basis. Michelle Moore, 7/11 representative, explained their fresh food will consist of fresh fruit, pre-made sandwiches, protein packs, hummus, as well as ready to go items such as fresh eggs, milk, all standard dairy products. She said it will be a larger grocery set with plenty of product selection. Do not know percentage. With no comments from the Public, Chairman Guglielmo looked to the Commissioners for deliberation, comments. Commissioner Williams stated the company has shown dedication to make it successful with their decision to eliminate beer and wine. She is in support. Commissioner Morales stated this project proposed at this site does not rise to our expectation and goals for our city in that part of the southwest section. He heard resident's concerns being so close to the schools and homes across the street. Appreciate that they made the change outside with the canopy for the gas pumps, but the bright lights underneath will have an impact on the neighborhood. He said there will be a lot of traffic around the school. He said this would probably work best in another part of our city but for this site will not make the findings for approval and should deny the entitlements. Vice Chair Oaxaca expressed the applicant has gone the extra mile in terms of responding to the concerns by staff, Commission, and residents in the area. He said this project is an opportunity to introduce what could be a new model for this type of project. One that is a lot more responsive, new and modern. He said it could bring a new version of this convenience store model to a community that could be a positive addition and should not suffer in comparison with other older approaches to the gas station/convenience store combination. He said looking at this project, this is one we struct a good balance between the needs of the community and expectations for this part of the city. One that could be new and modern in a good way. Commissioner Dopp asked a question regarding Healthy RC initiative and how does the process work. Sean McPherson replied the Healthy RC initiative was incorporated into the current General Plan where staff had analyzed this project up against. In terms of our consideration as to whether or not this would be seen as a benefit to the community. HPC/PC Regular Meeting MINUTES— May 12, 2021 Page 5 of 8 FINAL John Gillison, City Manager, explained Healthy RC process involves doing an audit of the products being sold. Healthy RC usually works with registered or certified dieticians and it's about moving away from the pre-packaged and some fast food and moving towards healthier choices. He said it's an interactive process and at the end of that, it's trying to make sure they have healthy choices and qualifies as a healthy option. Commissioner Dopp mentioned he does not know how it would look like in terms of a condition. John Gillison explained you could require that they work with Healthy RC and meet the standards applied to other restaurants and/or small grocery stores to ensure that they have sufficient fresh and healthy options available to customers. He said that would be the closer we could come at this point and time. Typically, the process is done with an existing store and they were looking to change out what they were selling. Matt Burris asked if Dopp can elaborate on what his concern and question is in regard to the condition. Commissioner Dopp responded his concern is the whole project. He said what if this model does not work from a Healthy perspective. He is looking for a condition that holds them to it. Nicholas Ghirelli asked Dopp if he is looking for a condition that is going to address the type of products sold at the 7/11 or looking for a greater justification to deny the project as a whole because you don't think it's use is appropriate at this location. Commissioner Dopp stated maybe he is foreseeing this project getting through. He said there needs to be an expectation moving forward to make sure 7/11 adheres to the principals and values the other Commissioners have expressed. In terms of a commitment to go above and beyond what a traditional convenience store actually does. Matt Burris provided options to the Planning Commissioners that could identify a minimum percentage type of foods or menu with the restaurant and the convenience store have dedicated towards Healthy foods. If you're concern and want to go broader and speak to the design of the site or need additional analysis to better understand what parameters that the project maybe excelling in or not doing so well in with regards to its physical form in the neighborhood and it's context. Commission Dopp stated he does not know if it advances the city towards long term generic goals of creating a world class community. He is not sure this really provides high quality job opportunities for the area. He said there is an expectation and model in the city that one of the bases to construct a mini argument here is to deny the project is it has been reiterated by Staff, Mayor and Council the desire to hold off for higher quality development is a worthwhile goal. Commissioner Dopp said we can do better and over time by committing one of the key vacant lots of land, maybe holding off and seeing overtime assuming the General Plan comes to fruition, we see a tremendous increase in development, activity and quality that 7/11 might look out of place. That is his general argument as to why we should deny the project. Requesting Commissioners take into consideration Healthy RC and maybe finding some way to put into resolution some formal requirements moving forward. Thinking long term. Vice Chair Oaxaca expressed we have encountered a project that has exposed issues through discussions about this project, he doesn't feel fully equipped to grapple with. The applicant has followed the rules the best they can. He said we are also dealing with conversations taking place at the Council level. We have a project before us that could potentially meet that we could to better, we have been HPC/PC Regular Meeting MINUTES— May 12, 2021 Page 6 of 8 FINAL talking about. He is starting to feel less certain to make a decision aye or nay tonight based on what he has heard. Chairman Guglielmo expressed his excitement for this project, the new 7/11 prototype to be used in Rancho Cucamonga. Stating applicant has gone the extra mile listening to our concerns. Offered up a Lead Silver Certification. He worries about the Healthy RC, since there is really no clear outline what that guideline might be. He is open to a discussion, but it may not be spelled out clear enough to where they commit to something but cannot deliver on it. As far as the best use for that land, he thought it might be a multi-tenant industrial park with retail stores in the front but it's just not that big of a site. It could generate in terms of revenue for the City. Talking about revenue per acre. He said it's the best use for that site in the foreseeable future. He is in support and would like to see it move forward. Commissioner Oaxaca stated he is certainly not the one to make a decision. Something we should all discuss as a Commission. Nicholas Ghirelli provided options for the Commissioners explaining they have draft resolutions to approve the project with all the conditions. They can ask staff to consider drafting conditions to address concerns assuring that fresh food is sold in dedicated areas as identified in the floor plan. He said if you try and come up with standards what those foods are, Commission should consider continuing the item since staff will not have those standards in a form of a condition tonight. Options are: approve as is; approve with new conditions; continue it so staff can explore new conditions; or deny the project. Commissioner Williams mentioned she has a 7/11 around the corner from where she lives. It's an old traditional 7/11 and she has been known to run over there and is amazed to find the item on their shelf. She does not find it unhealthy at all. The fact is the applicant has gone the extra mile is very impressive. She suggested that Healthy RC has guidelines and would be a very simple thing to take their logo to restaurants and have it placed on their menu, "This is recommended by Healthy RC". She feels like she is being asked to judge somebody who has already done everything we asked of them. She didn't think they would come back but they did. She believes the neighbors will enjoy it very much and love having the gas station there. She said we could end up having a nice product in that corner. Matt Burris mentioned that the Healthly Development Checklist has a number of parameters on healthy retailers and food offerings. We do have some information we could reference to help give suggestions, inspiration to address or draft a Condition of Approval to speak to healthy food retailing. If so inclined to have staff look into. Commissioner Morales stated he appreciate all the work staff and applicant and hearing the comments on both sides. He said it's not in the best interest for the city but respects what Commission decides to do tonight. Motion by Chairman Guglielmo, second by Commissioner Williams. Motion carried 3-2. Against: Morales, Dopp. F. Director Announcements - None G. Commission Announcements - None H. Adjournment HPC/PC Regular Meeting MINUTES— May 12, 2021 Page 7 of 8 FINAL Motion by Commissioner Williams, second by Commissioner Dopp to adjourn the meeting, motion carried 5- 0. Meeting was adjourned at 9:48 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Eli ab th Thornhill Ex tive Assistant, Planning Department Approved: May 26, 2021 - HPC/PC Meeting. HPC/PC Regular Meeting MINUTES — May 12, 2021 Page 8 of 8 FINAL rr CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Historic Preservation Commission and Planning Commission STUDY SESSION Agenda April 28, 2021 MINUTES VICTORIA GARDENS CULTURAL CENTER CELEBRATION HALL Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 5:00 p.m. The Special Study Session meeting of the Historic Presentation Commission and Planning Commission was held on April 28, 2021. The meeting was called to order by the Chairman at 5:00 p.m. A. Roll Call Planning Commission present: Chairman Tony Guglielmo, Vice Chair Oaxaca, Commissioner Bryan Dopp, Commissioner Tony Morales, Commissioner Diane Williams. Staff Present: John Gillison, City Manager; Matt Burris, Deputy City Manager; Elisa Cox, Deputy City Manager, Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager; Nicholas Ghirelli, City Attorney; Anne McIntosh, Planning Director; Dat Tran, Assistant Planner; David Eoff, Senior Planner; Mike Smith, Principal Planner; Jason Welday, Director Engineering, Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner; Mena Abdul-Ahad, Assistant Planner; Vincent Acuna, Associate Planner, Jennifer Nakamura, Management Analyst II; Flavio Nunez, Management Analyst ll; Paige Garcia, Management Aide; Griffin Sproul, Planning Technician. B. Public Communications Chairman Guglielmo opened for public communications and hearing none, closed communications. C. General Business C1. Discussion of City Council Goals for the Planning Commission and Land Development. John Gillison, City Manager, presented the Planning Commissioners a PowerPoint presentation on A Review of the City Council's Visions and Goals. Video of Mayor L. Dennis Michael stating our citizens are expecting quality level. Having a strong Planning Commission articulating the City Council's vision and goals is key to meeting these expectations. He mentioned over the decades, Rancho Cucamonga has learned that somethings we need to say no, in a firm but very professional way, and be patient to ensure when we say yes, we are confident we are choosing the best option for our community. He said as Mayor, along with City Council, are entrusting Planning Commissioners with the judgement to say no in order to preserve land for great opportunities are yet to come and yet to be envisioned. If a project is presented to you but it's not quite right or not to our high standards, do not hesitate to send applicant back with suggestions for improvement to their project. Enable us to rise to the next level of the world class community we continue striving to be. Video of Mayor Pro Tern - Lynne Kennedy stated the community expects us the City Council, Planning Commission and Staff to ensure that new development does not deplete the cities financial resources but adds to them to improve the long-term vitality of our community. The Community also expect a new development exceeds the quality of what has come before so we remain City of choice. Take the extra step and push for things that staff might not otherwise be able to achieve without your persistence and insistence. The City Council do not expect every project that comes before you to be approved. The Council does expect every project you do approve will be an additional step towards achieving our vision for the future, ensuring long term financial sustainability and quality growth. Matt Burris Deputy, City Manager, discussed Council Core Values and Mission Statement. Explaining why Council looks at quality of life and the 8 core values for all. The Planning Commissioners were given an opportunity to ask questions and provide comments. Primarily, the commissioners expressed appreciation for the meeting and acknowledged the importance of understanding the City's goals when reviewing the projects that come before them. D. Adjournment to Regular Planning Commission Meeting at 7:00 p.m. Meeting was adjourned at 5:54 p.m. Respectfully submitted, li"a i h Thornhill Executive Assistant, Planning Department Approved: May 26'h, 2021 — HPC/PC Meeting. HPC/PC Study Session Meeting MINUTES—April 28, 2021 Page 2 of 2 FINAL CITY OF • CUCAMONGA Historic Preservation Commission and Planning Commission Agenda April 28, 2021 MINUTES Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 7:00 p.m. The regular meeting of the Historic Presentation Commission and Planning Commission was held on April 28, 2021. The meeting was called to order by the Chairman at 7:00 p.m. A. Roll Call Planning Commission present: Chairman Tony Guglielmo, Vice Chair Oaxaca, Commissioner Bryan Dopp, Commissioner Tony Morales and Commissioner Diane Williams— (Williams joined meeting @ 7:15 P.M.) Staff Present: Nicholas Ghirelli, City Attorney; Anne McIntosh, Planning Director; Dat Tran, Assistant Planner; David Eoff, Senior Planner; Mike Smith, Principal Planner; Jason Welday, Engineering Director; Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner; Sean McPherson, Senior Planner; Jennifer Nakamura, Management Analysis II. B. Public Communications Chairman Guglielmo opened for public communications and hearing no comment, closed communications. C. Consent Calendar C1. Consideration to adopt Regular Meeting Minutes of April 14, 2021. Motion by Commissioner Dopp, second by Vice Chair Oaxaca. Motion carried 4-0. (Absent—Williams) D. Public Hearings D1. PROJECT LOCATED AT 8865 — 8875 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD & 8130 VINEYARD AVENUE — MCKENTLY MALAK ARCHITECTS —A request for site plan and architectural review to replace three existing buildings totaling 10,135 square feet with three new buildings and a drive-thru lane totaling 9,497 square feet, a related Conditional Use Permit to establish the drive-thru lane and a Variance to reduce the required building setback and maximum building height for a 4.21 acre (183,534 square feet) project site located in the Community Commercial (CC) District, Foothill Boulevard Overlay District, at the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue, APN: 0207-211-42. DESIGN REVIEW DRC2020-00318, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (MODIFICATION) DRC2020-00319 & VARIANCE DRC2020-00397. (Continued from April 14, 2021 Planning Commission Meeting.) Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner, presented Commissioners with a Staff Report and presentation (copy on file). Chairman Guglielmo asked the Commission if there were any comments for staff on the Public Hearing item. Commissioner Dopp asked what kind of discussions did Staff have with developer on the property that maybe more could be done with this parcel. He said possibly finding different ways to bring in business to that corner. Anne McIntosh, Planning Director, explained that this project has the existing center on Foothill frontage and behind it is a large vacant land area and two buildings. She said if you could conceive of something that could be placed on the entire site, if lots where all consolidated and redeveloped as one big project, we probably would not recommend approval of one-story buildings along Foothill. Your point is well taken in terms of our larger land use policies and what we are hoping for when we get a brand-new comprehensive project. She said this Applicant is looking to re-tenant their building and remodel this strip center. Their goal for this project is to remodel and bring in active tenants. She stated we evaluated what they are applying for, not what might be possible in the future. Nick Ghirelli, City Attorney, mentioned there are a number of vacant buildings being remodeled, and new uses are being put in there. There will be an increase of financial performance at this site. Tabe mentioned the vacant building will be split off from the rest of parcel as a condition of the project. He said in addition to the lot split, there is also a condition that will require the building within 30 days be abated so the nuisance conditions on the side are removed or the applicant has the opportunity to demolish the building. There will probably be some fiscal performance out of having that nuisance building removed from site. Commissioner Dopp asked if there is something more that could be done somewhere down the line doing something different with this project. He was wondering if possible, room for discussion to maybe create some sort of synergy in that project with the Historic Home. He is worried it will underutilize property over a couple of decades. He feels we might have a missed opportunity to use that home and create a more unifying development. Tabe van der Zwaag mentioned the Historic House is being used as a commercial building now. He said the owner of building has done some improvements for access to that building. Hopefully, we will get good tenants in that building and help create a more synergy between it and the rest of the center. With no further discussion from Commissioners, Chairman Guglielmo re-opened public hearing. Haney McLak, Applicant, provided background and history of project and expressed excitement to begin. Commissioner Dopp asked for Mr. McLak to talk about his unique challenges and aspects of this project he is excited to bring to the table. Mr. McLak answered trying to squeeze in a historic building on one side and existing lease with KFC on another in this particular corner was challenging. He said grading issues and getting the circulation to work well. He mentioned the biggest thing he loves is the opportunity for patio spaces. It brings more life to the space. Frank Wang, Property Manager for Vineyard Hill, LLC located in the City of Walnut, representing owners at 8800 Foothill Blvd., Rancho Cucamonga. Parcel Numbers: 0207-21143 and 0207-21144. He is representing owners to discuss the onsite project easements. Concerned that the proposed construction and renovations will affect the condition and status of these easements. He said owners of Vineyard Hill LLC are undergoing planning for future development on Foothill Blvd./Vineyard Ave. where its completion will foresee a significant increase in pedestrian traffic in neighboring commercial lots and want to discuss further on the implementation on the drive thru and impact of pedestrian traffic and safety. HPC/PC Regular Meeting MINUTES—April 28, 2021 Page 2 of 7 FINAL Tabe van der Zwaag stated their property is the vacant parcel that is part of the project site. They own two parcels within the greater project area. Explaining that parcel was originally designated as the anchor tenants to the shopping center when it was originally conceived by the City. He said we have been in discussion with the owner and they have provided a preliminary site plan for a mixed-use project in that location. Mr. McLak's rebuttal — Once we have the opportunity to sell Building F and subdivide the property, they will have direct access up on Vineyard and if there is a mixed-use project within that pedestrian, activity would take hold directly into Vineyard. Looking at the site development layout, there is access opportunities for sidewalks that can be developed within their property that would directly access our portion of the land and have access into KFC and other buildings as well. He is willing to look at their plans and how they can join cross access. With no more comments from the Public, Chairman Guglielmo closed public hearing. Vice Chair Oaxaca expressed he liked the look and design of the project. He said redesigning the corner with the two buildings gives it more a pedestrian friendly and welcoming feel. Drive thru lane will not become a problem with circulation within parking lot. Project is nicely done. Commissioner Morales stated the requested setback reduction for Building D is reasonable because of 13 ft. bus stop and right turn lane. He said it will be in close proximity to the existing building there now. The minor increase of building height of 4 ft. higher is reasonable so buildings look nice. The Condition of Approval for Building F is absolutely necessary to bring project and area up to our high standards. The architectural and design to the new buildings is definitely an improvement to what is there now and fulfills the City Council Goals of continuous improvement. He is in favor of the project. Commissioner Dopp stated his main reservation will continue to be the use of revenue and the best use of land. He said what he heard made him sway him in another direction. The house can be better utilized in the future. If this project at the end of the day does it, then that could be a motivation of hope. By approving this project, the hope would be we end up doing something great with the property that is left. He approves the property going forward. Commissioner Williams stated this project is long overdue. She said we can really set some high standards for this particular project. She would like to see restaurants with strung up lights, a little activity going on and once in a while with live music. She said the people in the area will welcome it and she is in favor of the project. Chairman Guglielmo agrees with Commissioner Williams. He is also excited about the project. Expressed he enjoyed the fly through video because it helps to visualize, and he hopes to encourage future applicants to do similar. Nick Ghirelli, City Attorney, reiterated the Commissioners will be acting on a Design Review approval that gives Commission to look at walkability and encourage harmonious appearance and structure within the city. Also heard about the traffic queuing with the drive-thru and a traffic study was prepared and provided to you. He said it sounds like all Commissioners have reached their conclusion but wanted to let you know for your consideration. Motion by Commissioner Morales, second by Commissioner Williams. Motion carried 5-0 HPC/PC Regular Meeting MINUTES—April 28, 2021 Page 3 of 7 FINAL E. General Business El. Discussion of Draft Development Standards for Industrial Uses and Related Amendments to the Development Code. Jennifer Nakamura, Management Analyst II, presented the Commissioners with a PowerPoint presentation to get their input, feedback, questions, and concerns. She said we will make final refinements to the Draft Development Code and on May 26'", we will come back for your recommendation and that recommendation will go to City Council on June 161" will then review the final draft development code and review your recommendation and make a final determination. Anne McIntosh mentioned as a reminder, the moratorium will end late June. We are timing this to meet that deadline. The ordinance will not be in effect until July. Getting it to the Council before the moratorium ends is adequate. Commissioner Morales' concern is truck traffic. He asked with truck traffic and parking, is it the best we can do to control queuing of trucks on the streets, so they are not parked in the middle of the road. Jennifer Nakamura replied the on-site queuing plan, which is one of the components of the parking management plan, is a piece. However, because we are looking at conditioning each of these projects there maybe, as we go through these projects, additional levers or controls we need to consider through conditions of approval. She said we will continue to engage the development community to ask their feedback. We are somewhat ahead of the curve in some of these issues. If we don't feel that its working, we can come back and present additional standards as we need them. Commissioner Morales mentioned ebikes are becoming more popular use of transportation. Employees for these industrial sites, should we add bike racks and charging station for those. Jennifer Nakamura responded it's a great idea and adding a charging station is reasonable and makes sense. Something to take a closer look at. Vice Chair Oaxaca stated when we look at the traffic implications of these large-scale truck intensive uses, are we looking at the standards from a perspective of making sure we don't fall into the cumulative trap. Where we didn't give ourselves the tools to be able to react to make sure we do not end up exactly what we did not want with those ugly looking levels of service on our streets through there. Jennifer Nakamura replied that is why we spent the time doing the type of analysis that we did. She said that is a concern but having those standards as part of the General Plan is important because it sets a foundation for future development in that area. Nick Ghirelli, City Attorney, mentioned for our larger warehouses the City has required that EIR's be prepared and you do have to look at cumulative impacts associated, not just the project but how it interacts with other projects in the area and other foreseeable projects. He said there is a mechanism for CEQA to evaluate that type of impact. He said that is separate from the planning process you are going through right now. Jason Welday, Engineering Director, replied one of the aspects in our traffic impact analysis standards is the level of service analysis, due to the problem is the capacity issues on our roadways. He said we look at both the project level at the opening year, as well as the horizon year, the future year scenario in order to try and capture the cumulative project by project basis but that cannot capture everything. He said we are working on a bigger picture analysis right now, so we don't find ourselves in that problem. HPC/PC Regular Meeting MINUTES—April 28, 2021 Page 4 of 7 FINAL Anne McIntosh reminded the Commission we will review the Draft General Plan on May 121" and a few days it will be released. You will have an opportunity to see that focus area defined better. Commissioner Williams commended staff for reaching out to stakeholders. She said not just take what they have to say but incorporate it, use it. Jennifer Nakamura stated they really focus on balancing what they say will work right now vs. what our long- term vision is for a world class community and meeting our vision. Anne McIntosh mentioned another thing we realized with an industrial development is it cycles. It may begin with an existing property owner and then maybe sold to a developer and the developer will find the tenants later. She said the responsibility we have is to think about the entire cycle and that is why we came up with the ideas with the different parking strategies. We have to think about that upfront. Chairman Guglielmo stated it looked like you were going from 50 to 60% in all zones. He asked if that applied just in SEIQ or all over the city. Jennifer Nakamura answered that it will apply to all industrial zones within the city. Not specific to SEIQ or Foothill corridor. These standards will apply everywhere. In the areas previously zoned heavily industrial those have a maximum of 50% and that is increasing. She said others are currently already at 60%. Commissioner Dopp asked is it fair to say we are trying to transition industrial areas in the city towards more of that new industrial conversation that maybe is more vibrant and brings more to the community at large. Jennifer Nakamura replied one of the things we talked about previously is the smaller buildings generally tend to have a better fiscal performance and one of things we want to do is encourage smaller businesses to come to the city as well. It's not to say, we are not interested in having larger industrial buildings or that we do not see a need for logistics or distribution. She said those are incredibly high demand and are really important. We want to have a variety and want that diversity of industrial base. We want to see auto repair shops, small printing business and other types of businesses that can help create this more vibrant community and then mix up with some of these commercial oriented uses. Commissioner Dopp asked what kind of demand is there for these kinds of uses in the Inland Empire or for Rancho Cucamonga at large. Jennifer Nakamura answered we don't know until we put it out there. She said if we don't, we could potentially be missing opportunities. Commissioner Dopp stated there is an opportunity moving forward as we transition over to the General Plan discussions within the next few months, he is looking at incubator spaces and a great opportunity we have to take partnership with some of the research universities in the area. Young adults who are doing something exciting in the Engineering program or Science field. He asked regarding manufacturing, is it fair to say moving forward, we are really looking to try and get rid of heavy polluting industries in our city. Jennifer Nakamura replied those businesses are transitioning out of California probably for reasons that have nothing to do with Rancho Cucamonga. We believe long term that is not going to be unsurprising with other type of heavier manufacture and other type of business. She said this is a time to start focusing on more cleaner, less noxious type of industrial uses. HPC/PC Regular Meeting MINUTES—April 28, 2021 Page 5 of 7 FINAL Commissioner Dopp stated in terms of warehousing, one thing he noticed in the land use destination is you look at warehouses that are over 100,000 square feet, you change the code to City Council approval. He asked if there is value in allowing the Planning Commission to have a recommendation to the City Council on warehouses that are large. The argument for it would probably be you are creating double backstop against projects that might be bad for the city by opening public communications twice. Jennifer Nakamura answered if that was not clear in the amendments, they will make it. She said that was always their intent to have the Planning Commission as a recommending body when the City Council makes a final decision. Commissioner Dopp appreciates the attempt of staff to use the code to drive a further discussion about what industrial areas can look like in the 21 SI Century. He said it's really good that Rancho Cucamonga is maybe starting that forge conversation in our area about the fact that industrial areas are not just a bunch of warehouses. He hopes by changing the code this starts to happen by some level. He commented that he appreciates the fact that staff focused on Foothill. Commission has a visionary idea for what we want the major thoroughfare to be by limiting the types of development on Foothill is a good thing. He said also, the focus on solar that requirement is critical moving forward. Commission talked about southwest corridor, by putting that requirement in, it moves to equity and better opportunities for better health for that side of the city. In terms of staff and how they approached this, he mentioned to Anne, this way of approaching development code is the best way. This approach works. Chairman Guglielmo opened up to the Public for any comments on this item. Bill Blankenship, Representative NAIOP Chapter, stated his concerns to the city and industry regarding this important matter and reporting some inconsistencies that need to be addressed. He said they look forward to working with staff and removing the moratorium. F. Director Announcements Anne McIntosh mentioned if Commissioners have any questions on the code to please contact us on your own within the next few weeks. We want to get ahead of any issues raised before that hearing date. Also, as City Manager Gillison mentioned, the City Council adopted a moratorium last week, an urgency ordinance, that if it's extended, it would occur on June 2nd and it is for service station moratorium. A City-wide issuance on any kind of planning entitlements and building permits. She also reminded Commissioners of the May 12'" Study Session starting at 4:00 p.m. via Zoom. G. Commission Announcements Commissioner Morales commented on the Draft Development Industrial Code. He congratulated staff and acknowledged them as a good example of executing the goal of being exclusive with the stakeholders and where able to come up with good products and thanked them for being professional. Commissioner Dopp requested a Staff or Director Report regarding Haven Avenue on what Council is looking for on the planning end of things. What is going to be the approach on the strategy for Haven. He said it's not urgent but if something comes up on the agendas in future meetings, it would be a good idea to have the background. HPC/PC Regular Meeting MINUTES—April 28, 2021 Page 6 of 7 FINAL H. Workshop — None I. Adjournment Motion by Vice Chair Oaxaca, second by Commissioner Williams to adjourn the meeting, motion carried 5- 0. Meeting was adjourned at 9:50 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Elizab&Thornhill Executive Assistant, Planning Department Approved: May 261h, 2021 — HPC/PC Meeting. HPC/PC Regular Meeting MINUTES—April 28, 2021 Page 7 of 7 FINAL 01 Sir DATE: May 26, 2021 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Planning Director INITIATED BY: Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Justine Garcia Deputy Director of Engineering Services SUBJECT: Consideration of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Capital Improvement Program for Fiscal Year 2021/22 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 21-35 which finds the Capital Improvement Program for Fiscal Year 2021/22 in conformity with the adopted General Plan. BACKGROUND: The Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Summary Index including the General Plan Reference(s), Exhibit 2, is required per Government Code 65401, Exhibit 1, to be adopted by the Ciy Council. The Planning Commission is required to find the CIP in conformity with the adopted General Plan. The CIP document includes a General Plan Policies section that evidences the specific policy references found in the General Plan. The CIP is a vital piece of the City's Annual Operating Budget as it dictated major capital expenditures obligated in any given year. The CIP consists of a multi-year plan for citywide infrastructure improvements. Each year, the City budgets for funded projects which will occur during said fiscal year. The list of projects contained in the CIP addresses both the City's long and short-term capital needs. It identifies projects that reflect the desires of the community, as well as project that serve operational and maintenance needs. ANALYSIS: The CIP Summary Index has been categorized by corresponding Departments and project names are in alphabetical order within each section. Individual project sheets include a short summary, cost, and year funded and can be viewed on the City's CIP Viewer online at: https://regis.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.htmI?id=8c4eO9a7fc5e450eb262d95be7l e8b6e FISCAL IMPACT: Projects are funded from a variety of sources including Development Impact Fees, Measure I, Gas Tax, and miscellaneous grants. The CIP for Fiscal Year 2021-22 proposes 61 projects totaling just over $62,500,000 to be executed in the upcoming fiscal year. In addition, there are 29 projects totaling just over $126,000,000 identified as future and unfunded. Page 1 COUNCIL MISSION /VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: The City's Engineering staff works with all Departments within the City to develop and implement an economically feasible CIP that embodies the City's public infrastructure needs. This item addresses the City Council's vision for the City by ensuring the construction of high-quality public improvements that promote a world class community and also supports the City Council's Core Value of promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community for all. EXHIBITS: Exhibit A - Government Code 65401 Exhibit B - Fiscal Year 2021/2022 Capital Improvement Program Summary Index Exhibit C - Draft Resolution 21-35 of Approval for Finding the Capital Improvement Program for Fiscal Year 2021/22 in Conformity with the Adopted General Plan Page 2 Government Code 66401. If a general plan or part thereof has been adopted, within such time as may be fixed by the legislative body, each county or city officer, department, board, or commission, and each governmental body, commission, or board, including the governing body of any special district or school district, whose jurisdiction lies wholly or partially within the county or city, whose functions include recommending, preparing plans for, or constructing, major public works, shall submit to the official agency, as designated by the respective county board of supervisors or city council, a list of the proposed public works recommended for planning, initiation or construction during the ensuing fiscal year. The official agency receiving the list of proposed public works shall list and classify all such recommendations and shall prepare a coordinated program of proposed public works for the ensuing fiscal year. Such coordinated program shall be submitted to the county or city planning agency for review and report to said official agency as to conformity with the adopted general plan or part thereof. Exhibit A 096 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA- CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM- FISCAL YEAR 2021/22 General Plan Reference(s) No. Project Prior Yr Funding 2021/22 Funded Future/Unfunded Total Project Cost Account Amount Account Amount Account Amount Community Services CS-1.3 1 Central Park-Amphitheatre Grant Opportunity 0 Grant Opportunity 0 Grant Opportunity 8,500,000 11,000,000 11204015650/2058120-0 0 11204015650/2058120-0 0 11204015650/2058120-0 1,500,000 Unknown 0 Unknown 0 Unknown 1,000,000 CS-1.3 2 Central Park-Dog Park 12744015650/2022274-0 223,240 12744015650/2022274-0 2,686,760 12744015650/2022274-0 0 3,737,450 11743035650/2022174-0 0 11743035650/2022174-0 201,760 11743035650/2022174-0 0 11204015650/2022120-0 0 11204015650/2022120-0 625,690 11204015650/2022120-0 0 CS-1.3 3 Central Park-Trailhead and Gardens 11204015650/1871120-0 14,030 11204015650/1871120-0 0 11204015650/1871120-0 0 6,014,030 Grant Opportunity 0 Grant Opportuntiy 0 Grant Opportunity 6,000,000 CS-1.1,CS-1.2,PF-1.3 4 Citywide Parks Master Plan 11204015650/2042120-0 29,000 11204015650/2042120-0 250,000 11204015650/2042120-0 0 279,000 PF-1.1,PF-1.2,PF-1.4 5 Cultural Center-Courtyard Redesign 10250015650/1894025-0 424,580 10250015650/1894025-0 190,000 10250015650/1894025-0 2,935,000 3,549,580 CS-1.2 6 Etiwanda Creek Park Phase II 11204015650/1664120-0 295,210 11204015650/1664120-0 0 11204015650/1664120-0 5,035,000 5,330,210 CS-1.8,CS-1.9 7 Garcia Park-Ball Field Lights 11393035650/1981139-0 20,000 11393035650/1981139-0 0 11393035650/1981139-0 460,000 480,000 PF-1.4,CM-4.4 8 Hermosa Street Beautification 11103165650/2060110-0 0 11103165650/2060110-0 15,000 11103165650/2060110-0 150,000 165,000 CS-6.5 9 Pacific Electric Trail Improvements 11204015650/2059120-0 0 11204015650/2059120-0 25,000 11204015650/2059120-0 47,000 360,000 12744015650/2059274-0 0 12744015650/2059274-0 0 12744015650/2059274-0 288,000 CS-1.8 10 Quakes Scoreboard Replacement 1025001-5607 0 1025001-5607 0 1025001-5607 650,000 650,000 Prior Yr Funding 2021/22 Funded Future/Unfunded Total Community Services Totals: $ 1,006,060 $ 3,994,210 $ 26,565,000 $ 31,565,270 General Plan Total Project Reference(s) No. Project Prior Yr Funding 2021/22 Funded Future/Unfunded Cost Account Amount Account Amount Account Amount Engineering Services 5th Street:Lucas Ranch Road to Hermosa Avenue Pavmenet CM-4.4 1 Rehabilitation 11773035650/2077177-0 0 11773035650/2077177-0 67,500 11773035650/2077177-0 0 67,500 6th Street at BNSF Spur Crossing West CM-5.1 2 of Etiwanda 11243035650/1839124-0 74,360 11243035650/1839124-0 150,000 11243035650/1839124-0 1,250,000 3,000,000 Unknown 0 Unknown 0 Unknown 1,525,640 6th Street-Charles Smith Avenue- CM-4.4 3 Hyssop Dr:Pavement Rehab 11743035650/2071174-0 0 11743035650/2071174-0 74,250 11743035650/2071174-0 0 74,250 CM-1.4,CM-3.10 4 ADA Ramps at Various Locations 11773035650/1150177-0 890,000 11773035650/1150177-0 250,000 11773035650/1150177-0 0 1,140,000 Advance Traffic Management System- CM-4.1,CM-4.3 5 Phase 2 11243035650/2004124-0 0 11243035650/2004124-0 6,382,000 11243035650/2004124-0 0 7,472,000 10250015650/2004025-0 0 10250015650/2004025-0 90,000 10250015650/2004025-0 0 Grant Opportunity 0 Grant Opportunity 1,000,000 Grant Opportunity 0 EXHIBIT B Page 1 of 5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA- CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM- FISCAL YEAR 2021/22 Archibald Avenue @ Victoria Street- CM-4.1 6 Traffic Sig Install 11243035650/1510124-0 0 11243035650/1510124-0 0 11243035650/1510124-0 715,000 715,000 Archibald Avenue:210 Freeway to 19th CM-4.4 7 St-Pavement Rehabilitation 11763035650/2074176-0 0 11763035650/2074176-0 101,250 11763035650/2074176-0 0 101,250 Banyan from Milliken Ave to Rochester CM-1.1,CM4.4 8 Ave-Pavement Rehab 11773035650/2033177-0 0 11773035650/2033177-0 60,000 11773035650/2033177-0 520,000 580,000 Banyan Street:Garnet Street-Beryl St CM-4.4 9 Pavement Rehabilitation 11743035650/2073174-0 0 11743035650/2073174-0 87,750 11743035650/2073174-0 0 87,750 Center Ave Pavement Rehabilitation CM-4.4 10 Project 11743035650/2008174-0 0 11743035650/2008174-0 475,000 11743035650/2008174-0 0 475,000 Cherry Avenue-Wilson to City Limit- CM-4.4 11 Pavement Rehabilitation 11743035650/2070174-0 0 11743035650/2070174-0 222,750 11743035650/2070174-0 0 222,750 Cucamonga Storm Drain Ph3-CLOMR- PS-7.2 12 FEMA 11123035650/1928112-0 3,208,683 11123035650/1928112-0 175,000 11123035650/1928112-0 0 3,383,683 CM-2.1 13 Day Creek Channel Bike Trail 11052085650/2014105-0 8,260 11052085650/2014105-0 208,740 11052085650/2014105-0 0 620,000 12143035650/2014214-0 4,450 12143035650/2014214-0 398,550 12143035650/2014214-0 0 East Ave at Highland Avenue-Traffic CM-1.1,CM-4.1 14 Control Device 11243035650/1958124-0 42,000 11243035650/1958124-0 540,000 11243035650/1958124-0 0 582,000 CM-1.6 15 Etiwanda Avenue Grade Separation 11813035650/1922181-0 10,500,000 11813035650/1922181-0 12,500,000 11813035650/1922181-0 52,150,000 75,150,000 Etiwanda Ave from Arrow Rte to Whittram Ave-Electric and Fiber Line RC-4.1 16 Extension 17053035650/1999705-0 0 17053035650/1999705-0 311,000 17053035650/1999705-0 0 311,000 CM-1.1,CM-1.2 17 Etiwanda Ave-East Side Widening 11773035650/2002177-0 5,000 11773035650/2002177-0 0 11773035650/2002177-0 0 850,000 11243035650/2002124-0 20,000 11243035650/2002124-0 825,000 11243035650/2002124-0 0 Etiwanda Avenue:Foothill Blvd to Wilson CM-1.1 CM-4.4 18 Ave-Pavement Rehab 11773035650/2007177-0 50,000 11773035650/2007177-0 0 11773035650/2007177-0 2,550,000 2,600,000 PF-8.1,PF-8.2 19 Fiber Optic Interconnect 11243035650/2061124-0 15,000 11243035650/2061124-0 660,000 11243035650/2061124-0 0 675,000 Foothill Blvd:Grove Ave to San CM-1.1 CM-4.4 20 Bernardino Rd 1001xxx5650/1964001-0 12,500 1001xxx5650/1964001-0 0 1001xxx5650/1964001-0 0 1,489,500 11983035650/1964198-0 37,000 11983035650/1964198-0 120,000 11983035650/1964198-0 600,000 12744015650/1964124-0 0 12744015650/1964124-0 0 12744015650/1964124-0 720,000 Foothill Boulevard-Pavement CM-1.1 CM-4.4 21 Rehabilitation 11793035650/2055179-0 0 11793035650/2055179-0 2,565,000 11793035650/2055179-0 0 2,565,000 Haven Avenue:Lemon-Wilson: CM-4.4 22 Pavement Rehabilitation 11743035650/2072174-0 0 11743035650/2072174-0 479,250 11743035650/2072174-0 0 479,250 CM-2.1 23 Hellman Avenue Sidewalk Improvements 12043145650/2016204-0 0 12043145650/2016204-0 72,200 12043145650/2016204-0 0 72,200 CS-6.4 24 Heritage Park Bridge Replacements 18473035650/1963847-0 150,240 18473035650/1963847-0 500,000 18473035650/1963847-0 0 1,398,405 32885015650/1963288-0 148,165 32885015650/1963288-0 600,000 32885015650/1963288-0 0 CM-4.4 25 Hermosa Ave-Pavement Rehabilitation 11773035650/2076177-0 0 11773035650/2076177-0 101,250 11773035650/2076177-0 0 101,250 Hermosa Ave-Foothill Blvd to Church St- CM-1.1,CM-1.2 26 Pavement Rehab 11743035650/2075174-0 0 11743035650/2075174-0 607,500 11743035650/2075174-0 0 607,500 Page 2 of 5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA- CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM- FISCAL YEAR 2021/22 CM-1.1 CM-4.4 27 Local Overlay at Various Locations 11773035650/1022177-0 490,000 11773035650/1022177-0 0 11773035650/1022177-0 0 2,860,000 11793035650/1022179-0 550,000 11793035650/1022179-0 0 11793035650/1022179-0 0 11743035650/1022174-0 0 11743035650/1022174-0 1,820,000 11743035650/1022174-0 0 Local Slurry Seal Pavement CM-1.1 CM-4.4 28 Rehabilitation C�Various Locations 11743035650/1022174-0 277,000 11743035650/1022174-0 280,000 11743035650/1022174-0 0 557,000 Pecan Avenue:W hittram Ave to Arrow HE-4.3.1 29 Rte-Street Improvements 12043145650/2038204-0 10,000 12043145650/2038204-0 0 12043145650/2038204-0 469,000 685,000 Unknown 0 Unknown 0 Unknown 206,000 PF-1.4,RC-4.2 30 RCMU Electric Substation#2 17053035650/2063705-0 0 17053035650/2063705-0 0 17053035650/2063705-0 3,070,000 3,070,000 RCMU Line Extension Design to PF-1.4,RC-4.2 31 Etiwanda Heights 17053035650/2064705-0 0 17053035650/2064705-0 0 17053035650/2064705-0 2,010,000 2,010,000 Rochester Avenue:6th St to Arrow Rte- CM-1.1 CM-4.4 32 Pavement Rehab 11773035650/2000177-0 0 11773035650/2000177-0 700,000 11773035650/2000177-0 0 700,000 Rochester Avenue:Base Line Rd- CM-1.1 CM-4.4 33 Highland Ave:Pavement Rehab 11793035650/1935179-0 0 11793035650/1935179-0 1,917,000 11793035650/1935179-0 0 1,917,000 The Resort Parkway(North)RCMU RC-4.1,RC-4.2 34 Distribution 17053035650/2037705-0 0 17053035650/2037705-0 5,000 17053035650/2037705-0 30,000 35,000 CM-2.1 35 School Crosswalk Improvements 12043145650/2015204-0 0 12043145650/2015204-0 247,300 12043145650/2015204-0 0 264,300 11243035650/2015124-0 17,000 11243035650/2015124-0 0 11243035650/2015124-0 0 CM-4.1 36 Upgrade LT Phases at Multiple Locations 11243035650/2079124-0 18,000 11243035650/2079124-0 90,350 11243035650/2079124-0 0 343,150 Grant Opportunity 0 Grant Opportunity 162,600 Grant Opportunity 0 11743035650/2079174-0 0 11743035650/2079174-0 72,200 11743035650/2079174-0 0 Whittram Avenue from Etiwanda Creek CM-1.1 CM-4.4 37 to Hickory Avenue 12043145650/2032204-0 13,000 12043145650/2032204-0 0 12043145650/2032204-0 240,000 253,000 Youngs Canyon Road-Extension from CM-1.2,CM-1.3 38 Koch Place to Cherry Avenue 18132035650/1601813-0 856,000 18132035650/1601813-0 0 18132035650/1601813-0 2,644,000 13,816,000 Unknown 0 Unknown 0 Unknown 10,316,000 Prior Yr Funding 2021/22 Funded Future/Unfunded Total Engineering Services Totals: $ 17,396,658 $ 34,918,440 $ 79,015,640 $ 131,263,238 General Plan Reference(s) No. Project Prior Yr Funding 2021/22 Funded Future/Unfunded Total Project Cost Account Amount Account Amount Account Amount Fire District PS-1.1,PS-2.1,PS-2.3, PS-2.4 1 Fire District-8th Street Station 179 32885015650/2057288-0 716,770 32885015650/2057288-0 0 32885015650/2057288-0 11,728,500 12,445,270 PS-1.1,PS-2.1,PS-2.3, PS-2.4 2 Fire District-Town Center Station 178 32885015650/1645288-0 575,000 32885015650/1645288-0 14,800,000 32885015650/1645288-0 0 15,375,000 Prior Yr Funding 2021/22 Funded Future/Unfunded Total Fire District Totals: $ 1,291,770 $ 14,800,000 $ 11,728,500 $ 27,820,270 General Plan Reference(s) No. Project Prior Yr Funding 2021/22 Funded Future/Unfunded Total Project Cost Account Amount Account Amount Account Amount Page 3 of 5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA- CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM- FISCAL YEAR 2021/22 Library Paul A.Biane Library-Second Story and PF-3.1,PF-3.2 1 Beyond Project 13296015650/1867329-0 3,375,660 13296015650/1867329-0 1,225,000 13296015650/1867329-0 899,340 6,900,000 10250015650/1867025-0 0 10250015650/1867025-0 725,000 10250015650/1867025-0 675,000 Prior Yr Funding 2021/22 Funded Future/Unfunded Total Library Totals: $ 3,375,660 $ 1,950,000 $ 1,574,340 $ 6,900,000 General Plan Reference(s) No. Project Prior Yr Funding 2021/22 Funded Future/Unfunded Total Project Cost Account Amount Account Amount Account Amount Police Department Police Station Operational and COVID- PF-1.1,PS-4.3 1 Related Lobby Improvements 1127701-5602 0 1127701-5602 170,000 1127701-5602 0 170,000 Prior Yr Funding 2021/22 Funded Future/Unfunded Total Police Department Totals: $ - $ 170,000 $ - $ 170,000 General Plan Reference(s) No. Project Prior Yr Funding 2021/22 Funded Future/Unfunded Total Project Cost Account Amount Account Amount Account Amount Public Works Beryl Park East-All Inclusive Playground PF-1.4 1 Replacement 1141303-5607 0 1141303-5607 40,000 1141303-5607 0 40,000 Beryl Park East-Tennis Court LED Light PF-1.1,PF-1.4 2 Replacements 1141303-5607 0 1141303-5607 50,000 1141303-5607 0 50,000 PF-1.1 3 Citywide HVAC&Lighting Controls 10250015650/1978025-0 0 10250015650/1978025-0 50,000 10250015650/1978025-0 0 50,000 CM-2.1 4 Citywide Concrete Repair 10013185650/1991001-0 1,175,000 10013185650/1991001-0 200,000 10013185650/1991001-0 800,000 2,975,000 11773035650/1991177-0 300,000 11773035650/1991177-0 100,000 11773035650/1991177-0 400,000 PF-1.4 5 Civic Center ADA&Covid Improvements 1025001-5602 82,230 1025001-5602 1,302,400 1025001-5602 0 1,384,630 PF-1.1 6 Civic Center HVAC-Plant Replacement 10250015650/2029025-0 173,000 10250015650/2029025-0 1,500,000 10250015650/2029025-0 0 1,673,000 Council Chamber-Carpet&Seating PF-1.4 7 Replacement 1025001-5602 0 1025001-5602 10,000 1025001-5602 0 10,000 Etiwanda Creek Park-LED Lighting PF-1.1,PF-1.4 8 Replacement 1137303-5607 0 1137303-5607 100,000 1137303-5607 0 100,000 CS-2.5 9 Fleet Shop-Rental Space 1025001-5602 70,000 1025001-5602 150,000 1025001-5602 0 220,000 Heritage Park-Equestrian Center Roof PF-1.4 10 Replacement 1848303-5607 0 1848303-5607 150,000 1848303-5607 0 150,000 Heritage Park-Pedestrian Trail PF-1.4 11 Replacement 1848303-5607 0 1848303-5607 150,000 1848303-5607 0 150,000 Heritage Park-Senior Baseball Field LED PF-1.1,PF-1.4 12 Light Replacement 1848303-5607 0 1848303-5607 100,000 1848303-5607 0 100,000 PF-1.1,PF-1.4 13 Heritage Park-Solar Pathway Lighting 1848303-5607 0 1848303-5607 90,000 1848303-5607 0 90,000 PF-1.1,PF-1.4 14 LMD 1-Drought Tolerant Landscaping 11413035650/2056130-0 0 11413035650/2056130-0 50,000 11413035650/2056130-0 0 50,000 Page 4 of 5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA- CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM- FISCAL YEAR 2021/22 PF-1.4 15 LMD 10-1-andscape Renovation 1140303-5607 0 1140303-5607 150,000 1140303-5607 0 150,000 PF-1.1,PF-1.4 16 LMD 2-Paseo Lighting Retrofits 11313035650/1716131-0 567,550 11313035650/1716131-0 300,000 11313035650/1716131-0 364,890 1,232,440 LMD 2-Water Conservation/Landscape LU-10.3,LU-10.6 17 Renovation 11313035650/1787131-0 863,030 11313035650/1787131-0 700,000 11313035650/1787131-0 2,100,000 3,663,030 LMD 4R-Water Conservation/Landscape LU-10.3,LU-10.6 18 Renovation 11343035650/1787134-0 617,960 11343035650/1787134-0 700,000 11343035650/1787134-0 2,100,000 3,417,960 PF-1.1,PF-1.4 19 LMD 6-Drought Tolerant Landscaping 11363035650/2056136-0 0 11363035650/2056136-0 50,000 11363035650/2056136-0 0 50,000 PF-1.1,PF-1.4 20 Red Hill Park-Solar Pathway Lighting 1848303-5607 0 1848303-5607 90,000 1848303-5607 0 90,000 Traffic Signal Battery Backup System PF-1.1,PF-1.4 21 Replacement 11743035650/1980174-0 247,500 11743035650/1980174-0 127,500 11743035650/1980174-0 255,000 1,380,000 17120015650/1980712-0 300,000 17120015650/1980712-0 150,000 17120015650/1980712-0 300,000 CM-4.1 22 Traffic Signal Modification 11743035650/2035174-0 176,000 11743035650/2035174-0 200,000 11743035650/2035174-0 800,000 1,176,000 LU-3.4 23 Urban Forest Master Plan Unknown 0 Unknown 0 Unknown 200,000 200,000 Prior Yr Funding 2021/22 Funded Future/Unfunded Total Public Works Totals: $ 4,572,270 $ 6,509,900 $ 7,319,890 $ 18,362,060 Page 5 of 5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Olt, - JM DATE: May 26, 2021 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Planning Director INITIATED BY: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner SUBJECT: LOCATED AT THE EAST TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD BETWEEN EAST AVENUE AND CHOCTAW PLACE — W&W LAND DESIGN CONSULTANTS — Site plan review of a proposal to subdivide a vacant parcel of approximately 146,429 square feet(3.36 acres) into five residential (5) lots in the Very Low (VL) Residential District that includes a Variance to reduce the required lot depth on two (2) lots and a minor exception for wall height for a project site located in the Etiwanda Specific Plan; Tentative Tract Map, Variance & Minor Exception - APN: 0225-181-73. A Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts has been prepared for consideration (SUBTT20152, DRC2019-00786, DRC2019-00787). (Planning Commission directed staff to bring back the Resolution of Approval - continued from May 12, 2021 PC Meeting.) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission take the following actions: • Approve Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20152, Variance DRC2019-00786 and Minor Exception DRC2019- 00787 through the adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval with attached standard conditions. BACKGROUND: On May 12, 2021, the Planning Commission reviewed the project and recommended that resolutions of approval for the project be placed on the next Planning Commission agenda for their review and approval. Exhibit A—Tentative Tract Map Resolution 21-26 Exhibit B —Variance Resolution 21-27 Exhibit C — Minor Exception Resolution 21-28 Exhibit D — Condition of Approval SUBTT20152 Exhibit E — Statement of Agreement Page 1 of 1 RESOLUTION NO. 21-26 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT20152, A REQUEST TO SUBDIVIDE A VACANT PARCEL OF APPROXIMATELY 146,429 SQUARE FEET (3.4 ACRES) INTO FIVE (5) LOTS IN THE VERY LOW (VL) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, WITHIN THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED AT THE EAST TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD BETWEEN EAST AVENUE AND CHOCTAW PLACE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF —APN: 0225-181-73. A. Recitals. 1. W&W Land Design Consultants filed an application for the issuance of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20152, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 12th day of May 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing and continued said meeting to May 26, 2021. 3. On the 26th day of May 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded said hearing on that date. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting on May 26, 2021, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a vacant parcel located at the east terminus of Arapaho Road between East Avenue and Choctaw Place; and b. The project site is a vacant parcel with an area of approximately 146,429 square feet (3.4 acres). The overall dimensions of the site are approximately 442 feet (east to west) by approximately 331 feet (north to south); and C. The existing land uses on, and General Plan land use and zoning designations for, the project site and the surrounding properties (relative to the above-noted parcels)are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Vacant Very Low Very Low VL Residential District* North Single-Family Residences Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential District* Exhibit A PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-26 TTM SUBTT20152 —W&W LAND DESIGN CONSULTANTS May 26, 2021 Page 2 South Single-Family Residences Very Low Very Low VL Residential District* East Single-Family Residence/ Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential District* Frontier Switching Station West Single-Family Residences Very Low Very Low VL Residential District* *Etiwanda Specific Plan .1 to 2 Units Per Acre and Equestrian Overlay d. The proposal is to subdivide the property into five (5) lots for single-family residential development; and e. All lots will comply with the development standards applicable to this zoning district as described in Figure 5-2 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, except for lot depth. The lot depth of Lots 1 and 5,which will be approximately 135 feet in depth and will not comply with the minimum lot depth of 200 feet as required per the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The lot depths of Lots 2, 3 and 4 will be at least 200 feet. The width of each lot will meet the required 90-foot dimension. Individual lot areas will range between 20,230 square feet to 31,940 square feet, which are in excess of the minimum 20,000 square foot lot size. The minimum average lot area is 25,828 square feet,which is in excess of the minimum 25,000 square foot average lot size; and f. This application is in conjunction with Variance DRC2019-00786, to reduce the required lot size on Lots 1 and 5, and Minor Exception DRC2019-00787,to allow for increased wall heights due to onsite grades. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed development is in accord with the General Plan,the objectives of the Development Code and the Etiwanda Specific Plan, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. The proposal is to subdivide a property with an area of approximately 146,429 square feet (3.4 acres) into five (5) lots for single-family residential development. The underlying General Plan designation is Very Low Residential which is intended for the development of single- family residences on 0.5-acre lots or larger. The proposed lots range in size from 20,230 square feet to 31,940 square feet. b. The proposed development,together with the conditions applicable thereto,will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The project site is vacant;the proposed land use is consistent with the land uses within the vicinity where it is located and the expectations of the community. The zoning of the property and all surrounding properties is Very Low (VL) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan. C. The proposed development complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code and the Etiwanda Specific Plan except for the proposed lot depth of Lots 1 and 5 that will be approximately 135 feet in depth and will not comply with the minimum lot depth of 200 feet as required per the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The applicant has submitted a Variance request for consideration by the Planning Commission. The proposed development, otherwise, meets all standards outlined in the Development Code and the Etiwanda Specific Plan and the design and development standards and policies of the Planning Commission and the City. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-26 TTM SUBTT20152 —W&W LAND DESIGN CONSULTANTS May 26, 2021 Page 3 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration,together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act("CEQA"), an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project was prepared by Blodgett Baylosis Env. Planning and was peer-reviewed by The Altum Group, a consultant contracted by the City to review the report. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, it was determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. The mitigation measures that the applicant will be required to comply with will reduce potential project environmental impacts. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration; and b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it,finds: (i)that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii)that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration; and C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 774-4330. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-26 TTM SUBTT20152 —W&W LAND DESIGN CONSULTANTS May 26, 2021 Page 4 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF MAY 2021. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Tony Guglielmo, Chairman ATTEST: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary I, Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 26th day of May 2021, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: RESOLUTION NO. 21-27 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VARIANCE DRC2019-00786 A REQUEST TO ALLOW A REDUCTION IN THE REQUIRED LOT DEPTH FROM 200-FOOT TO APPROXIMATELY 135 FEET FOR TWO (2) LOTS OF A PROPOSED 5-LOT SUBDIVISION IN THE VERY LOW (VL) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, WITHIN THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED AT THE EAST TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD BETWEEN EAST AVENUE AND CHOCTAW PLACE;AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0225-181-73. A. Recitals. 1. W&W Land Design Consultants filed an application for the issuance of Variance DRC2017-00786 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Variance request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 12th day of May 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing and continued said hearing to May 26, 2021. 3. On the 26th day of May 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded said hearing on that date. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on May 26, 2021, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a vacant parcel located at the east terminus of Arapaho Road between East Avenue and Choctaw Place; and b. The application is related to Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20152 for the subdivision of 146,429 square feet (3.36 acres) into 5 residential lots; and C. The project site is a vacant parcel with an area of approximately 146,429 square feet (3.4 acres). The overall dimensions of the site are approximately 442 feet (east to west) by approximately 331 feet (north to south); and Exhibit B PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-27 VARIANCE DRC2019-00786 —W&W LAND DESIGN CONSULTANTS May 26, 2021 Page 2 d. The existing land uses on, and General Plan land use and zoning designations for, the project site and the surrounding properties(relative to the above-noted parcels)are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Vacant Very Low Very Low VL Residential District* North Single-Family Residences Very Low Very Low VL Residential District* South Single-Family Residences Very Low Very Low VL Residential District* East Single-Family Residence/ Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential District* Frontier Switching Station West Single-Family Residences Very Low Very Low VL Residential District* *Etiwanda Specific Plan .1 to 2 Units Per Acre and Equestrian Overlay e. The applicant is requesting a Variance to allow a reduced lot depth for Lots 1 and 5 (the subject lots) of the proposed 5-lot subdivision; and f. Per Figure 5-2 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, the required minimum lot depth for residential lots within the Very Low (VL) Residential District is 200 feet; and g. The proposed lot depth of the subject lots will be approximately 135 feet; and h. The proposed lot width of the subject lots will be approximately 190 feet, while the lot area of the two lots will be 25,732 square feet (Lot 1) and 23,615 square feet (Lot 5). 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulations would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the Development Code. The proposed residential subdivision is an in-fill project with limited reasonable lot configuration options. The overall north to south dimension of the project site is approximately 331 feet. The project site is bound on all sides by existing development. Therefore, there is no opportunity to acquire additional land, specifically to the north or the south,which would allow Lots 1 and 5 to be greater in depth. Reducing the number of lots to allow for greater lot size is not reasonable as most of the proposed lots are already significantly larger than the minimum required for this development district; and b. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same district. The project site is located at the east terminus of Arapaho Road approximately 200 feet east of the intersection of that street with Choctaw Place. The project site is bound to the north, south, and west by existing residential development and associated improvements. The extension of Arapaho Road will generally bisect the project site. Alternate alignments of the proposed extension such as shifting it further south or north are not possible because of the limits imposed by technical standards for street design including minimum dimensions for street width, curve radii, and cul-de-sacs. The project site was part of a larger parcel that was partially developed with a telephone switching facility on the east side. In May 2006, the larger parcel was subdivided into two (2) parcels. The part of the property that was developed with PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-27 VARIANCE DRC2019-00786 —W&W LAND DESIGN CONSULTANTS May 26, 2021 Page 3 the telephone switching facility became a separate parcel, while the larger, undeveloped part of the property was sold to the current owner(the applicant). As the telephone facility occupies the entire smaller parcel, it was not possible at the time of the subdivision, nor is it possible now, to consider the option of a street connecting the project site with East Avenue that, in turn, could have provided the applicant the opportunity to propose an alternate subdivision design; and C. That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district. The overall dimensions of the project site are approximately 442 feet (east to west) by approximately 331 feet (north to south). Requiring that all lots be 200 feet in depth would necessitate a re-design of the subdivision. This would cause a different set of challenges. All lots must have public street access and the extension of Arapaho Road will be an east to west direction. In order for the depth of each lot to be 200 feet, the long axis of all lots, i.e. the axis along where the lot depth is measured, also would have to be in an east to west direction. The only way to reasonably accomplish this would be to eliminate one of the lots. However, the result would be excessively large lots relative to the existing properties in the neighborhood and the development district in general. Furthermore,the orientation of the long axis would not match the long axis of the other properties within the existing residential development to the west that have primary frontage along Arapaho Road. This will affect the location of, or preclude altogether, improvements such as room additions and accessory structures as the setbacks would be oriented differently as well; and d. That the granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district. The principal purpose of the minimum lot depth standard is to allow horse keeping, while still maintaining a minimum separation of 70 feet between horse corrals (or similar equestrian facilities)and dwellings on neighboring properties per Section 17.08.030(E)(2)(b)of the Development Code. The reduction in the depth of the subject lots from 200 feet to 135 feet will not be in conflict with this requirement as it will be offset by the width of each lot. Each lot will be an average of approximately 175 feet wide; the minimum lot width in this development district is 90 feet.The applicant has demonstrated on the plans that horse corrals can be plotted such that they are 70 feet from the residence on the adjacent lot. Lots 1 and 5 will be 25,732 and 23,615 square foot in area, respectively, which will exceed the minimum lot area of 20,000 square feet applicable to the development district of the site; and e. That the granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health,safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The reduced depth of the subject lots will not affect the neighboring properties and/or property owners. Practical differences in the physical attributes/characteristics between the lots in the surrounding area and the subject lots will be limited. Separation between structures and common property lines will be consistent with existing residential development within this development district. The overall area of Lots 1 and 5 will be 25,732 and 23,615 square feet, respectively, similar to the lot areas of the neighboring properties to the west at 13186 Arapaho Road and at 6323 Choctaw Place are 22,165 and 21,162 square feet, respectively. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration,together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-27 VARIANCE DRC2019-00786 —W&W LAND DESIGN CONSULTANTS May 26, 2021 Page 4 findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act("CEQA"), an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project was prepared by Blodgett Baylosis Env. Planning and was peer-reviewed by The Altum Group, a consultant contracted by the City to review the report. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, it was determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. The mitigation measures that the applicant will be required to comply with will reduce potential project environmental impacts. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it,finds: (i)that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii)that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 774-4330. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF MAY 2021 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Tony Guglielmo, Chairman PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-27 VARIANCE DRC2019-00786 —W&W LAND DESIGN CONSULTANTS May 26, 2021 Page 5 ATTEST: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary I, Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary, of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 26th day of May 2021 by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: RESOLUTION NO. 21-28 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2019-00787, A REQUEST FOR AN INCREASE IN THE MAXIMUM WALL HEIGHT FROM 6 FEET TO 8 FEET ALONG THE SOUTHERN BOUNDARY OF THE PROJECT SITE, ADJACENT TO LOTS 4 AND 5, IN CONJUNCTION WITH A PROPOSED 5-LOT SUBDIVISION IN THE VERY LOW (VL) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, WITHIN THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED AT THE EAST TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD BETWEEN EAST AVENUE AND CHOCTAW PLACE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0225-181-73. A. Recitals. 1. W&W Land Design Consultants filed an application for Minor Exception DRC2019- 00787 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Minor Exception request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 12th day of May 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing and concluded said hearing to May 26, 2021. 3. On the 26th day of May 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded said hearing on that date. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on May 26, 2021, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a parcel located at the east terminus of Arapaho Road between East Avenue and Choctaw Place; and b. The application is related to Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20152 for the subdivision of 146,429 square feet (3.4 acres) into 5 residential lots; and C. The project site is a rectangular parcel with an overall area of approximately 3.4 acres. The overall dimensions of the site are approximately 442 feet deep (east to west) and 331 feet (north to south) and is currently vacant; and Exhibit C PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-28 ME DRC2019-00787—W&W LAND DESIGN SERVICES May 26, 2021 Page 2 d. The existing land uses on, and General Plan land use and zoning designations for, the project site and the surrounding properties (relative to the above-noted parcels) are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Vacant Very Low Very Low VL Residential District* North Single-Family Residences Very Low Very Low VL Residential District* South Single-Family Residences Very Low Very Low VL Residential District* East Single-Family Residence/ Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential District* Frontier Switching Station West Single-Family Residences Very Low Very Low VL Residential District* *Etiwanda Specific Plan .1 to 2 Units Per Acre and Equestrian Overlay e. The applicant is requesting a Minor Exception to allow the construction of combination walls (garden/screen walls on top of retaining walls) with a height of up to 8 feet adjacent to lots 4 and 5 within the subdivision; and f. Per Table 17.48.050-1 of the Development Code, the maximum wall height of fences and walls along the rear and interior property lines is 6 feet. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The Minor Exception is consistent with the General Plan any applicable specific plan or development agreement. The General Plan designation of the project site is Very Low (VL) Residential, and the zoning of the property is Very Low (VL) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan. The Minor Exception does not affect the General Plan designation, zoning designation, or the residential purpose of the project site; and b. The proposed development is compatible with the existing and proposed land uses in the surrounding area. The Minor Exception will not result in a substantially larger house, an increase in lot coverage, an increase in density, or adjustments to the physical lot area of the subject lots; and C. The proposed exception to the specific development standard(s) is necessary to allow creative design solutions compatible with the desires of the community and/or to accommodate unique site conditions. The proposed walls will be located generally where there are grade differences that warrant retaining walls. Generally, the natural terrain of the project site slopes from north to south. Therefore, the usual alternative, an earthen slope, is not practical because of the lack of available space in the side yards between the house and the property line wall; and d. The granting of the Minor Exception will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district, and will not be detrimental to public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious properties or improvements in the vicinity. The Minor Exception will allow the applicant to construct walls that will provide adequate property screening/security and usable yard area and are similar to other walls that PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-28 ME DRC2019-00787—W&W LAND DESIGN SERVICES May 26, 2021 Page 3 have been constructed for the same purpose because of similar site conditions. The walls will be consistent with the standards and guidelines of the City. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project was prepared by Blodgett Baylosis Env. Planning and was peer-reviewed by The Altum Group, a consultant contracted by the City to review the report. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, it was determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. The mitigation measures that the applicant will be required to comply with will reduce potential project environmental impacts. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i)that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 774-4330. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-28 ME DRC2019-00787 —W&W LAND DESIGN SERVICES May 26, 2021 Page 4 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF MAY 2021. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Tony Guglielmo, Chairman ATTEST: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary I, Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 26th day of May 2021, by the following vote-to- wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Conditions of Approval RANCHO CUCAMONGA Community Development Department Project#: SUBTT20152 DRC2019-00786, DRC2019-00787, DRC2019-00971 Project Name: Arapaho Road - 5 Lot Subdivision Location: 6334 EAST AVE - 022518173-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Minor Exception, Sign Permit Notice of Filing, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. All conditions of approval for Design Review DRC2014-00425 shall apply to SUBTT20152. Standard Conditions of Approval 2. The applicant shall sign the Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval provided by the Planning Department. The signed Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval shall be returned to the Planning Department prior to the submittal of grading/construction plans for plan check, request for a business license, and/or commencement of the approved activity. 3. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 4. Approval of Tentative Tract No. SUBTT20152 is granted subject to the approval of Variance DRC2019-00786. 5. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval or Approval Letter, Conditions of Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 6. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption and Mitigated Negative Declaration fee in the amount of $2,530.25. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing. 7. This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the Engineering Services Department within 3 years from the date of the approval. 8. Access gates to the rear yards shall be constructed from a material more durable than wood gates. Acceptable materials include, but are not limited to, wrought iron and PVC. 9. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. Exhibit D www.CityofRC.us Printed:3/24/2021 Project#: SUBTT20152 DRC2019-00786, DRC2019-00787, DRC2019-00971 Project Name: Arapaho Road - 5 Lot Subdivision Location: 6334 EAST AVE - 022518173-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Minor Exception, Sign Permit Notice of Filing, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 10. Construct block walls between homes (i.e., along interior side and rear property lines), rather than wood fencing for permanence, durability, and design consistency. 11. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination and in conformance with Building and Safety Services Department standards, the Municipal Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department (RCFD) Standards. 12. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) shall not prohibit the keeping the equine animals where zoning requirements for the keeping of said animals have been met. Individual lot owners in subdivisions shall have the option of keeping said animals without the necessity of appealing to boards of directors of homeowners' associations for amendments to the CC&Rs. 13. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Services Department and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer. The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning Department a list of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes. 14. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all lots for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department approval; including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing. 15. Provide a 24-foot by 24-foot or 12-foot by 48-foot corral area in the rear yard adjacent to the Local Feeder Trail. Grade access from corral to trail with a maximum slope of 5:1 and a minimum width of 10 feet. 16. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, the Development Code regulations and the Etiwanda Specific Plan. 17. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 18. On corner side yards, provide minimum 5-foot setback between walls/fences and sidewalk. The 5-foot wall/fence setback and the parkway shall have landscape and irrigation in addition to the required street trees. Detailed landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. The parkway landscaping including trees, shrubs, ground covers and irrigation shall be maintained by the property owner. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the parkway maintenance requirement, in a standard format as determined by the Planning Director, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. www.CityofRC.us Printed:3/24/2021 Page 2 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20152 DRC2019-00786, DRC2019-00787, DRC2019-00971 Project Name: Arapaho Road - 5 Lot Subdivision Location: 6334 EAST AVE - 022518173-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Minor Exception, Sign Permit Notice of Filing, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 19. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 20. Local Feeder Trail entrances shall also provide access for service vehicles, such as veterinarians or hay deliveries, including a 12-foot minimum drive approach. Entrance shall be gated provided that equestrian access is maintained through step-throughs in accordance with Engineering Services Department Standard Drawing 1006-B and 1007-B. 21. Local Feeder Trail grades shall not exceed 0.5 percent at the downstream end of a trail for a distance of 25 feet behind the public right-of-way line to prohibit trail debris from reaching the street. Drainage devices may be required by the Building and Safety Official. 22. Where corner side, interior side or rear yard property lines are adjacent to local equestrian trails, construct minimum 6-foot high decorative masonry walls. Decorative masonry shall mean split-face double sided block, 'slump stone' or an alternative material that is acceptable to the Design Review Committee. 23. For single-family residential development within the Equestrian/Rural Overlay District, at least one model home shall be provided with a constructed 24-foot by 24-foot corral with appropriate fencing. 24. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 25. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double wall condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owners at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/fences along the project perimeter. 26. For residential development, return walls and corner side walls shall be decorative masonry. 27. For single-family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer. Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Department to determine that they are in satisfactory condition. 28. Front yard and corner side yard landscaping and irrigation shall be required per the Development Code and/or This requirement shall be in addition to the required street trees and slope planting. 29. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits for the development or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. For development occurring in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, the landscape plans will also be reviewed by Fire Construction Services. www.CityofRC.us Printed:3/24/2021 Page 3 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20152 DRC2019-00786, DRC2019-00787, DRC2019-00971 Project Name: Arapaho Road - 5 Lot Subdivision Location: 6334 EAST AVE - 022518173-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Minor Exception, Sign Permit Notice of Filing, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 30. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 31. All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than 2:1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 32. All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 33. Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. These criteria shall encourage the natural growth characteristics of the selected tree species. 34. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Services Department. 35. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of water efficient landscaping per Development Code Chapter 17.82. Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Arapaho Road frontage improvements shall be in accordance with "local" and Etiwanda Specific Plan standards as required and including A. Provide curb, gutter, sidewalk, streetlights, signing and striping and drive approaches. B. Street lights shall be owned by the City. Developers shall be responsible to coordinate and pay all costs to provide power on City owned street lights. Coordinate with City staff for design and installation requirements. C. Drive approach shall be in accordance with City Driveway Policy. 2. All driveway approaches shall be constructed per City Standards and City Policy. 3. Prior to the approval and recordation of the final map, CC&R's shall include the maintenance of the cross-lot drainage systems to be maintained by a homeowners association. 4. The final map shall delineate the private cross lot drainage easements. www.CityofRC.us Printed:3/24/2021 Page 4 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20152 DRC2019-00786, DRC2019-00787, DRC2019-00971 Project Name: Arapaho Road - 5 Lot Subdivision Location: 6334 EAST AVE - 022518173-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Minor Exception, Sign Permit Notice of Filing, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 5. On East Avenue, the existing under sidewalk drain near the Frontier Communications facility which discharges storm water flow from the south side of Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 16969 shall be reconstructed to City Plan No. 107-C. Street plan revisions shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval for this street improvement. On Arapaho road, the proposed under sidewalk drain for Lot 1 shall be City Plan No. 107-B. 6. The street lights shall be owned by the City. Developer shall be responsible to coordinate and pay all costs of street lights and to provide power to City owned street lights. 7. Prior to the approval of the final map, or issuance of a grading permit, the vehicular access to private local trails shall be from Local Streets. To prevent vehicles on local trails from entering a Community Trail, provide step-through per Std. Dwg. 1007 Standard Conditions of Approval 8. The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site property interests necessary to construct the required public improvements, and if he/she should fail to do so, the developer shall, at least 120 days prior to submittal of the final map for approval, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Government Code Sections 66462 and 66462.5 at such time as the City decides to acquire the property interests required for the improvements. Such agreement shall provide for payment by the developer of all costs incurred by the City if the City decides to acquire the off-site property interests required in connection with the subdivision. Security for a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the City, at developer's cost. The appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal. This condition applies in particular, but not limited to: PRIVATE STORM DRAIN EASEMENT. 9. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or noted on the final map. 10. Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets, community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, traffic signal encroachment and maintenance, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. Private easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc.) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. 11. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. 12. Public storm drain easements shall be graded to convey overflows in the event of a blockage in a sump catch basin on the public street, and provisions made to pass through walls. 13. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. www.CityofRC.us Printed:3/24/2021 Page 5 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20152 DRC2019-00786, DRC2019-00787, DRC2019-00971 Project Name: Arapaho Road - 5 Lot Subdivision Location: 6334 EAST AVE - 022518173-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Minor Exception, Sign Permit Notice of Filing, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 14. ** CD Information Required Prior to Sign-Off for Building Permit Prior to the issuance of building permits, if valuation is greater or equal to $100,000, a Diversion Deposit and a related administrative fee shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 65% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Applicant must identify if they are self-hauling or utilizing Burrtec prior to issuance of a building permit. Proof of diversion must be submitted to the Environmental Engineering Division within 60 days following the completion of the construction and /or demolition project. Contact Susan Shaker, Environmental Engineering, at (909) 774-4062 for more information. Instructions and forms are available at the City's website, www.cityofrc.us, under City Hall / Engineering / Environmental Programs/Construction & Demolition Diversion Program. 15. Prior to approval of the final map, a deposit shall be posted with the City covering the estimated cost of apportioning the assessments under Assessment District among the newly created parcels. The assessment districts the project will join are LIVID 7, SLD 1 and SLD 7. 16. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to Building Permit issuance if no map is involved. 17. Prior to finalization of any development phase, sufficient improvement plans shall be completed beyond the phase boundaries to assure secondary access and drainage protection to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Phase boundaries shall correspond to lot lines shown on the approved tentative map. 18. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. www.CityofRC.us Printed:3/24/2021 Page 6 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20152 DRC2019-00786, DRC2019-00787, DRC2019-00971 Project Name: Arapaho Road - 5 Lot Subdivision Location: 6334 EAST AVE - 022518173-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Minor Exception, Sign Permit Notice of Filing, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 19. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch pvc with pull rope or as specified. e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all corners of intersections per latest ADA standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Manager prior to submittal for first plan check. 20. Install fiber optic conduit, vaults, and manholes on Arapaho Road per Standard Drawings 135-137. Public improvement plans shall show the location and limits of the conduits, vaults and manholes with construction notes. www.CityofRC.us Printed:3/24/2021 Page 7 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20152 DRC2019-00786, DRC2019-00787, DRC2019-00971 Project Name: Arapaho Road - 5 Lot Subdivision Location: 6334 EAST AVE - 022518173-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Minor Exception, Sign Permit Notice of Filing, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 21. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Street Name: Arapaho Road Botanical Name: Lagerstroemia indica 'Muskogee' Common Name: Crape MyrtleMin. Grow Space: 2' Spacing: 20' O.C. Size 15 gallon Qty. 5 minimum Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1)All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 22. All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. 23. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. 24. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 25. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 26. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 27. Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&Rs or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the final map. www.CityofRC.us Printed:3/24/2021 Page 8 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20152 DRC2019-00786, DRC2019-00787, DRC2019-00971 Project Name: Arapaho Road - 5 Lot Subdivision Location: 6334 EAST AVE - 022518173-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Minor Exception, Sign Permit Notice of Filing, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 28. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. The assessment districts the project will join are LIVID 7, SLD 1, and SLD 7. 29. Add the following note to any private landscape plans that show street trees: "All improvements within the public right-of-way, including street trees, shall be installed per the public improvement plans." If there is a discrepancy between the public and private plans, the street improvement plans will govern. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout "Information for Grading Plans and Permit". 2. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code and/or the California Residential Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 3. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 4. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Engineering Services Department prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit. 6. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. All dust control sign(s) shall be located outside of the public right of way. 7. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Engineering Services Department for review, the rough grading plan shall be a separate plan submittal and permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 8. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall(s) on property line(s) or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. www.CityofRC.us Printed:3/24/2021 Page 9 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20152 DRC2019-00786, DRC2019-00787, DRC2019-00971 Project Name: Arapaho Road - 5 Lot Subdivision Location: 6334 EAST AVE - 022518173-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Minor Exception, Sign Permit Notice of Filing, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 9. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the grading plan shall show that all manufactured slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way, permitted line, or the adjacent private property. All slope offsets shall meet the requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 10. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the City Engineer or his designee.. 11. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond project boundary. 12. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over-excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 13. Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, the permitted grading plan (or architectural site plan) set shall show in each of the typical sections and the plan view show how the separations between the building exterior and exterior ground surface meet the requirements of Sections CBC1804.3/CRC R401.3, CBC2304.11.2.2/CRC R317.1(2) and CBC2512.1.2/CRC R703.6.2.1 of the current adopted California Building Code/Residential Code. 14. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall obtain a signed and notarized letter from the adjacent property owner(s) for ALL work proposed on the adjacent property. The letter shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set. The letter shall show on either the title sheet or a detail sheet of the grading and drainage plan set. 15. The proposed on-site wastewater treatment (septic) system (OWTS) shall be located in the front yard to allow a future connection to a public sewer main. 16. Prior to approval of the project-specific storm water quality management plan, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer, or his designee, a precise grading plan showing the location and elevations of existing topographical features, and showing the location and proposed elevations of proposed structures and drainage of the site. www.CityofRC.us Printed:3/24/2021 Page 10 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20152 DRC2019-00786, DRC2019-00787, DRC2019-00971 Project Name: Arapaho Road - 5 Lot Subdivision Location: 6334 EAST AVE - 022518173-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Minor Exception, Sign Permit Notice of Filing, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 17. DESIGN ISSUE; The average high ground water level for the subject property is 265-feet below the surface of the ground. Therefore prior to the issuance of any grading and/or building permit, the applicant shall provide, as a project condition of approval, a separate Private On-Site Wastewater Treatment (septic) System (OWTS) plan showing the maximum depth of any proposed seepage pits to be a minimum 10-feet above the average high ground water level. 18. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the grading and drainage plan shall show the following information in the equestrian trails: — Provide PVC fencing per city standards, provide a 4" thick decomposed granite (DG) surface, provide a drainage V ditch parallel to the trail, provide a bridge over the V ditch where necessary for access to corals, and gates to corrals. The equestrian bridges shall be capable of carrying vehicle loads where necessary. Where the longitudinal slope (s) is S< 5% the cross fall shall be 2%, if S>5% the cross fall may be 4% maximum. Where water bars required, the spacing for the water bars is: 50' maximum for longitudinal slopes of 4% to 6%, 40' maximum for longitudinal slopes of 6.1% to 9%, 30' maximum for longitudinal slopes of 9.1% to 12%, 20' maximum for longitudinal slopes greater than 12%. In the equestrian trails water bars shall also be placed at the top and bottom of the trail where the gradient of the trail changes, i.e. a steep downhill slope which will cause additional erosion to the trail. 19. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Engineering Services Department for review and approval for on-site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. The report shall contain water surface profile gradient calculations for all storm drain pipes 12-inches and larger in diameter, and all cross-lot concrete V-ditches. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. In addition, the project specific drainage study shall provide inlet calculations showing the proper sizing of the water quality management plan storm water flows into the proposed structural storm water treatment devices. 20. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage acceptance easements(s) from adjacent downstream property owner(s) or discharge flows in a natural condition (concentrated flows are not accepted) and shall provide the City Engineer, or his designee, a drainage study showing the proposed flows do not exceed the existing flows prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit. This condition of approval specifically applies to the storm water draining through the existing Frontier Communications facility. 21. The site shall be rough graded to eliminate all cross-lot drainage, (except in approved facilities adjacent to private trails, or private cross lot drainage easements shown on the final map). All slopes and retaining walls necessary to accomplish this shall be installed prior to final map approval. 22. Flow lines steeper than 6 percent could be erosive. The applicant shall provide hard lined gutters and swales where concentrated flows exceed 3fps, and anywhere that flow lines exceed 10 percent. This shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan prior to issuance of a grading permit. www.CityofRC.us Printed:3/24/2021 Page 11 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20152 DRC2019-00786, DRC2019-00787, DRC2019-00971 Project Name: Arapaho Road - 5 Lot Subdivision Location: 6334 EAST AVE - 022518173-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Minor Exception, Sign Permit Notice of Filing, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 23. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall demonstrate that the storm water run-off will not adversely affect the downstream properties and that the water may legally discharge to the downstream properties. The engineer of record shall show on the final permitted grading and drainage plan one (1) or more of the following items are met: a) There is sufficient downstream capacity to accept the proposed storm water flows and that the downstream property owner have provided permission to accept the upstream storm water flows; b) a legal document/entity exists allowing developed storm water flows to be discharged to the property lower in elevation; c) a storm drain system to safely convey the storm water flows to a public storm drain system without causing flooding to adjacent property(ies). 24. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution 92-17, if a lot may not directly drain off-site directly to the street or other acceptable drainage device (such as a drainage ditch adjacent to an equestrian trail), then: a) drainage may flow from only one lot onto only one other lot; b) a drainage easement shall be provided over the lot accepting the drainage; c) the drainage shall be contained within either a concrete/rock lined swale/channel or a reinforced concrete pipe; and d) the drainage shall be designed with excess capacity to account for the probable lack of necessary maintenance, therefore, it shall be designed to convey two (2) times the runoff from a 100-year storm event with the minimum diameter of the pipe being 12-inches. 25. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the latest adopted California Plumbing Code. Private storm drain improvements shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan. 26. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy or final sign off by the Building Inspector the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) storm water treatment devices and best management practices (BMP). 27. Prior to approval of the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), the WQMP shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 28. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment devices and best management practices (BMP) as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan, shall be provided for by CC&R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the approval of the Water Quality Management Plan. Said CC&R's and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. 29. Prior to the issuance of a rough or precise Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Engineer, or his designee, and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 30. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID). The WDID number shall also be shown on the WQMP Site and Drainage Plan document. www.CityofRC.us Printed:3/24/2021 Page 12 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20152 DRC2019-00786, DRC2019-00787, DRC2019-00971 Project Name: Arapaho Road - 5 Lot Subdivision Location: 6334 EAST AVE - 022518173-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Minor Exception, Sign Permit Notice of Filing, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 31. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment best management practices (BMP) devices, as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan, shall be provided for by CC&R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the issuance a grading permit. Said CC&R's and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. 32. The Homeowner's Association (HOA) shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the structural storm water treatment devices, commonly referred to as BMPs, to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The HOA shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the HOA. 33. The Homeowner's Association (HOA) shall follow the inspection and maintenance requirements of the approved project specific Water Quality Management Plan and shall provide a copy of the inspection reports on a biennial basis to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. 34. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, building permit or Engineering Services Department issued right of way permit, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer, or his designee, a final project specific water quality management plan for review and approval, and shall have said document recorded with the San Bernardino County Recorder's Office. 35. The final project-specific water quality management plan (WQMP) shall include executed maintenance agreements along with the maintenance guidelines for all proprietary structural storm water treatment devices (BMP's). In the event the applicant cannot get the proprietary device maintenance agreements executed prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant is required to submit a letter to be included within the WQMP document, and scanned and pasted onto the Site and Drainage Plan which states that prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy with applicant shall enter into a contract for the maintenance of the proprietary storm water treatment device. If the proprietary storm water treatment device is part of a residential subdivision, prior to the sale of the residential lot, the developer shall include maintenance agreement(s) as part of the sale of the residential lot to the buyer. A copy of the maintenance agreements to be included in the sale of the property shall be included within the WQMP document. 36. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and approval of the project specific water quality management plan all private storm water catch basin inlets shall include insert filters to capture those pollutants of concern as addressed in the in the final project-specific water quality management plan (WQMP). At a minimum catch basin insert filters to capture trash and other floating debris. All catch basin insert filters shall be maintained on a regular basis as described in the "Inspection and Maintenance Responsibility for Post Construction BMP" section of the final project-specific water quality management plan. www.CityofRC.us Printed:3/24/2021 Page 13 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20152 DRC2019-00786, DRC2019-00787, DRC2019-00971 Project Name: Arapaho Road - 5 Lot Subdivision Location: 6334 EAST AVE - 022518173-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Minor Exception, Sign Permit Notice of Filing, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 37. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Project-Specific Water Quality Management Plan shall include a completed copy of "Worksheet H: Factor of Safety and Design Infiltration Worksheet" located in Appendix D "Section VII — Infiltration Rate Evaluation Protocol and Factor of Safety Recommendations, ..." of the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans. The infiltration study shall include the Soil Engineer's recommendations for Appendix D, Table VII.3: Suitability Assessment Related Considerations for Infiltration Facility Safety Factors". 38. Prior to approval of the final project-specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project-specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans". 39. The subject project, shall accept all existing off-site storm water drainage flows and safely convey those flows through or around the project site. If existing off-site storm water drainage flows mix with any on-site storm water drainage flows, then the off-site storm water drainage flows shall be treated with the on-site storm water drainage flows for storm water quality purposes, prior to discharging the storm water drainage flows from the project site. NOTE: This specifically occurs along the north tract boundary adjacent to the Community Trail. This project shall not cause flooding on the adjacent Community Trail, and shall have a design shown to accept any off-site upstream storm water flows. 40. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy by the Building Official, or his designee, the civil engineer of record shall file a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Post Construction Storm Water Treatment Devices As-Built Certificate with the Environmental Programs Coordinator, City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Services Department. www.CityofRC.us Printed:3/24/2021 Page 14 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20152 DRC2019-00786, DRC2019-00787, DRC2019-00971 Project Name: Arapaho Road - 5 Lot Subdivision Location: 6334 EAST AVE - 022518173-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Minor Exception, Sign Permit Notice of Filing, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 41. GROUND WATER PROTECTION: Prior to approval of the final project specific water quality management plan (WQMP), the WQMP document shall meet the requirements of the State Water Resources Control Board Order No. R8-2010-0036 (NPDES No. CAS 618036), the San Bernardino County Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Separation (MS4) Permit reads: Section XI.D(Water Quality Management Plan Requirements).8(Groundwater Protection): Treatment Control BMPs utilizing infiltration [exclusive of incidental infiltration and BMPs not designed to primarily function as infiltration devices (such as grassy swales, detention basins, vegetated buffer strips, constructed wetlands, etc.)] must comply with the following minimum requirements to protect groundwater: a. Use of structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause or contribute to an exceedance of ground water quality objectives. b. Source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration should be evaluated prior to infiltration. c. Adequate pretreatment of runoff prior to infiltration shall be required in gas stations and large commercial parking lots. (NOTE: The State Water Quality Control Board defines a large commercial parking lot as `100,000 sq. ft. or more of commercial development to include parking lot (with 100 or more vehicle traffics), OR, by means of 5,000sgft or more of allowable space designated for parking purposes'). d. Unless adequate pre-treatment of runoff is provided prior to infiltration structural infiltration treatment BMPs must not be used for areas of industrial or light industrial activity{77), areas subject to high vehicular traffic (25,000 or more daily traffic); car washes; fleet storage areas; nurseries; or any other high threat to water quality land uses or activities. e. Class V injection wells or dry wells must not be placed in areas subject to vehicular{78} repair or maintenance activities{79}, such as an auto body repair shop, automotive repair shop, new and used car dealership, specialty repair shop (e.g., transmission and muffler repair shop) or any facility that does any vehicular repair work. f. Structural infiltration BMP treatment shall not be used at sites that are known to have soil and groundwater contamination. g. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall be located at least 100 feet horizontally from any water supply wells. h. The vertical distance from the bottom of any infiltration structural treatment BMP to the historic high groundwater mark shall be at least 10-feet. Where the groundwater basins do not support beneficial uses, this vertical distance criteria may be reduced, provided groundwater quality is maintained. i. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause a nuisance or pollution as defined in Water Code Section 13050. www.CityofRC.us Printed:3/24/2021 Page 15 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20152 DRC2019-00786, DRC2019-00787, DRC2019-00971 Project Name: Arapaho Road - 5 Lot Subdivision Location: 6334 EAST AVE - 022518173-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Minor Exception, Sign Permit Notice of Filing, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 42. Prior to approval of the final project-specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project-specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans". Note: As this project has been previously graded and the site soils have been compacted for building pads, the use of the Custom Soil Resource Report for San Bernardino County Southwestern Part by the United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resource Conservation Service for natural soils is not acceptable for soil groundwater infiltration rates. Note: A current infiltration report will be required for this project as the project has been rough graded under a previous permit. 43. Prior to the issuance of a rough or precise grading permit, the applicant shall provide to the City Engineer, or his designee, for reference, a copy of the separate On-site Wastewater Treatment System (OWTS) plans for reference with the submittal of the precise grading plan. The separately permitted OWTS shall be submitted to the City Engineer, or designee, for review and permitting. The OWTS shall meet the requirements of adopted Local Agency Management Program for On-Site Wastewater Treatment Systems (LAMP OWTS), effective September 17, 2018 which will require site specific percolation testing which may reduce the required seepage pit depth. A copy of the LAMP OWTS is available on the Building and Safety webpage. 44. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit for this development, the applicant shall provide to the City Engineer, or his designee, for reference a copy of the separate On-site Wastewater Treatment System (OWTS) plans for reference with the submittal of the precise grading plan. The separately permitted OWTS shall be submitted to the Building Official for review and permitting. The OWTS shall meet the requirements of adopted Local Agency Management Program for On-Site Wastewater Treatment Systems (LAMP OWTS), effective September 17, 2018 which will require site specific percolation testing which may reduce the required seepage pit depth. A copy of the LAMP OWTS is available on the Building and Safety webpage. 45. The permitted grading plan and the final project-specific water quality management plan are proposing stormwater detention basin (commonly referred to as BMPs) for the treatment of storm water runoff as required in the current adopted Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Systems (MS4) Permit. The depth of the proposed retained water equals or exceeds 18-inches. Therefore prior to the issuance of a grading permit and approval of the final project-specific water quality management plan the applicant shall show a barrier a minimum of 60-inches above the finished ground surface. 46. Prior to the approval of the final project-specific water quality management plan (WQMP), the WQMP shall show the locations of the equestrian corrals which meet the City's current Development Code requirements. Each equestrian corral shall have a storm water (BMP) provided to treat storm water runoff from the corral. 47. The proposed storm water BMP infiltration basin is showing an overflow pipe along the southside of the project. The project drainage (hydrology/hydraulics) study shall provide hydraulic calculations for the pipe. The pipe shall also be shown in a plan and profile view on the permitted grading plan set showing a water surface profile gradient. The pipe shall be capable of withstanding H-10 vehicle loads. www.CityofRC.us Printed:3/24/2021 Page 16 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20152 DRC2019-00786, DRC2019-00787, DRC2019-00971 Project Name: Arapaho Road - 5 Lot Subdivision Location: 6334 EAST AVE - 022518173-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Minor Exception, Sign Permit Notice of Filing, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section www.CityofRC.us Printed:3/24/2021 Page 17 of 17 Planning Department Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval for SUBTT20152 I, Winston Liu, as applicant for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20152, hereby state that I am in agreement with and accept the conditions of approval for the subject tentative tract map located at APN: 0225-181-73 in Rancho Cucamonga, California, as adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on May 26, 2021 and as listed below and attached. Applicant Signature Date Conditions of Approval 1. The applicant shall sign the Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval provided by the Planning Department. The signed Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval shall be returned to the Planning Department prior to the submittal of grading/construction plans for plan check, request for a business license, and/or commencement of the approved activity. 2. All conditions of approval attached to Resolution of Approval No. 21-26 for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20152 shall apply. Exhibit E RESOLUTION NO. 21-35 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FINDING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEAR 2021/22 IN CONFORMITY WITH THE ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN WHEREAS, pursuant to Sections 65103 (c)and 65401 of the State of California Government Code, the Planning Commission has reviewed the Capital Improvement Program (CIP)for Fiscal Year 2021/22 as to its consistency with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan; and WHEREAS, the project is Categorically Exempt (Section 15306-Class 6)from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and WHEREAS,the Planning Commission reviewed the analysis and recommendations of Engineering Services Department staff, contained in their Staff Report dated May 26, 2021. NOW, THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED, ORDERED AND FOUND that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California, finds the Capital Improvement Program for Fiscal Year 2021/22 in conformity with the adopted General Plan. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26T" DAY OF MAY 2021. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Tony Guglielmo, Chairman ATTEST: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary I, Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 26th day of May 2021, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Exhibit C Page 1 of 1 102 RESOLUTION NO. 21-26 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT20152, A REQUEST TO SUBDIVIDE A VACANT PARCEL OF APPROXIMATELY 146,429 SQUARE FEET (3.4 ACRES) INTO FIVE (5) LOTS IN THE VERY LOW (VL) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, WITHIN THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED AT THE EAST TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD BETWEEN EAST AVENUE AND CHOCTAW PLACE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF —APN: 0225-181-73. A. Recitals. 1. W&W Land Design Consultants filed an application for the issuance of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20152, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 12th day of May 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing and continued said meeting to May 26, 2021. 3. On the 26th day of May 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded said hearing on that date. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting on May 26, 2021, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a vacant parcel located at the east terminus of Arapaho Road between East Avenue and Choctaw Place; and b. The project site is a vacant parcel with an area of approximately 146,429 square feet (3.4 acres). The overall dimensions of the site are approximately 442 feet (east to west) by approximately 331 feet (north to south); and C. The existing land uses on, and General Plan land use and zoning designations for, the project site and the surrounding properties (relative to the above-noted parcels)are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Vacant Very Low Very Low VL Residential District* North Single-Family Residences Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential District* Exhibit A PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-26 TTM SUBTT20152 —W&W LAND DESIGN CONSULTANTS May 26, 2021 Page 2 South Single-Family Residences Very Low Very Low VL Residential District* East Single-Family Residence/ Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential District* Frontier Switching Station West Single-Family Residences Very Low Very Low VL Residential District* *Etiwanda Specific Plan .1 to 2 Units Per Acre and Equestrian Overlay d. The proposal is to subdivide the property into five (5) lots for single-family residential development; and e. All lots will comply with the development standards applicable to this zoning district as described in Figure 5-2 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, except for lot depth. The lot depth of Lots 1 and 5,which will be approximately 135 feet in depth and will not comply with the minimum lot depth of 200 feet as required per the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The lot depths of Lots 2, 3 and 4 will be at least 200 feet. The width of each lot will meet the required 90-foot dimension. Individual lot areas will range between 20,230 square feet to 31,940 square feet, which are in excess of the minimum 20,000 square foot lot size. The minimum average lot area is 25,828 square feet,which is in excess of the minimum 25,000 square foot average lot size; and f. This application is in conjunction with Variance DRC2019-00786, to reduce the required lot size on Lots 1 and 5, and Minor Exception DRC2019-00787,to allow for increased wall heights due to onsite grades. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed development is in accord with the General Plan,the objectives of the Development Code and the Etiwanda Specific Plan, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. The proposal is to subdivide a property with an area of approximately 146,429 square feet (3.4 acres) into five (5) lots for single-family residential development. The underlying General Plan designation is Very Low Residential which is intended for the development of single- family residences on 0.5-acre lots or larger. The proposed lots range in size from 20,230 square feet to 31,940 square feet. b. The proposed development,together with the conditions applicable thereto,will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The project site is vacant;the proposed land use is consistent with the land uses within the vicinity where it is located and the expectations of the community. The zoning of the property and all surrounding properties is Very Low (VL) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan. C. The proposed development complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code and the Etiwanda Specific Plan except for the proposed lot depth of Lots 1 and 5 that will be approximately 135 feet in depth and will not comply with the minimum lot depth of 200 feet as required per the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The applicant has submitted a Variance request for consideration by the Planning Commission. The proposed development, otherwise, meets all standards outlined in the Development Code and the Etiwanda Specific Plan and the design and development standards and policies of the Planning Commission and the City. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-26 TTM SUBTT20152 —W&W LAND DESIGN CONSULTANTS May 26, 2021 Page 3 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration,together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act("CEQA"), an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project was prepared by Blodgett Baylosis Env. Planning and was peer-reviewed by The Altum Group, a consultant contracted by the City to review the report. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, it was determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. The mitigation measures that the applicant will be required to comply with will reduce potential project environmental impacts. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration; and b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it,finds: (i)that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii)that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration; and C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 774-4330. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-26 TTM SUBTT20152 —W&W LAND DESIGN CONSULTANTS May 26, 2021 Page 4 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF MAY 2021. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Tony Guglielmo, Chairman ATTEST: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary I, Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 26th day of May 2021, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: RESOLUTION NO. 21-27 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VARIANCE DRC2019-00786 A REQUEST TO ALLOW A REDUCTION IN THE REQUIRED LOT DEPTH FROM 200-FOOT TO APPROXIMATELY 135 FEET FOR TWO (2) LOTS OF A PROPOSED 5-LOT SUBDIVISION IN THE VERY LOW (VL) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, WITHIN THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED AT THE EAST TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD BETWEEN EAST AVENUE AND CHOCTAW PLACE;AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0225-181-73. A. Recitals. 1. W&W Land Design Consultants filed an application for the issuance of Variance DRC2017-00786 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Variance request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 12th day of May 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing and continued said hearing to May 26, 2021. 3. On the 26th day of May 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded said hearing on that date. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on May 26, 2021, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a vacant parcel located at the east terminus of Arapaho Road between East Avenue and Choctaw Place; and b. The application is related to Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20152 for the subdivision of 146,429 square feet (3.36 acres) into 5 residential lots; and C. The project site is a vacant parcel with an area of approximately 146,429 square feet (3.4 acres). The overall dimensions of the site are approximately 442 feet (east to west) by approximately 331 feet (north to south); and Exhibit B PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-27 VARIANCE DRC2019-00786 —W&W LAND DESIGN CONSULTANTS May 26, 2021 Page 2 d. The existing land uses on, and General Plan land use and zoning designations for, the project site and the surrounding properties(relative to the above-noted parcels)are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Vacant Very Low Very Low VL Residential District* North Single-Family Residences Very Low Very Low VL Residential District* South Single-Family Residences Very Low Very Low VL Residential District* East Single-Family Residence/ Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential District* Frontier Switching Station West Single-Family Residences Very Low Very Low VL Residential District* *Etiwanda Specific Plan .1 to 2 Units Per Acre and Equestrian Overlay e. The applicant is requesting a Variance to allow a reduced lot depth for Lots 1 and 5 (the subject lots) of the proposed 5-lot subdivision; and f. Per Figure 5-2 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, the required minimum lot depth for residential lots within the Very Low (VL) Residential District is 200 feet; and g. The proposed lot depth of the subject lots will be approximately 135 feet; and h. The proposed lot width of the subject lots will be approximately 190 feet, while the lot area of the two lots will be 25,732 square feet (Lot 1) and 23,615 square feet (Lot 5). 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulations would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the Development Code. The proposed residential subdivision is an in-fill project with limited reasonable lot configuration options. The overall north to south dimension of the project site is approximately 331 feet. The project site is bound on all sides by existing development. Therefore, there is no opportunity to acquire additional land, specifically to the north or the south,which would allow Lots 1 and 5 to be greater in depth. Reducing the number of lots to allow for greater lot size is not reasonable as most of the proposed lots are already significantly larger than the minimum required for this development district; and b. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same district. The project site is located at the east terminus of Arapaho Road approximately 200 feet east of the intersection of that street with Choctaw Place. The project site is bound to the north, south, and west by existing residential development and associated improvements. The extension of Arapaho Road will generally bisect the project site. Alternate alignments of the proposed extension such as shifting it further south or north are not possible because of the limits imposed by technical standards for street design including minimum dimensions for street width, curve radii, and cul-de-sacs. The project site was part of a larger parcel that was partially developed with a telephone switching facility on the east side. In May 2006, the larger parcel was subdivided into two (2) parcels. The part of the property that was developed with PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-27 VARIANCE DRC2019-00786 —W&W LAND DESIGN CONSULTANTS May 26, 2021 Page 3 the telephone switching facility became a separate parcel, while the larger, undeveloped part of the property was sold to the current owner(the applicant). As the telephone facility occupies the entire smaller parcel, it was not possible at the time of the subdivision, nor is it possible now, to consider the option of a street connecting the project site with East Avenue that, in turn, could have provided the applicant the opportunity to propose an alternate subdivision design; and C. That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district. The overall dimensions of the project site are approximately 442 feet (east to west) by approximately 331 feet (north to south). Requiring that all lots be 200 feet in depth would necessitate a re-design of the subdivision. This would cause a different set of challenges. All lots must have public street access and the extension of Arapaho Road will be an east to west direction. In order for the depth of each lot to be 200 feet, the long axis of all lots, i.e. the axis along where the lot depth is measured, also would have to be in an east to west direction. The only way to reasonably accomplish this would be to eliminate one of the lots. However, the result would be excessively large lots relative to the existing properties in the neighborhood and the development district in general. Furthermore,the orientation of the long axis would not match the long axis of the other properties within the existing residential development to the west that have primary frontage along Arapaho Road. This will affect the location of, or preclude altogether, improvements such as room additions and accessory structures as the setbacks would be oriented differently as well; and d. That the granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district. The principal purpose of the minimum lot depth standard is to allow horse keeping, while still maintaining a minimum separation of 70 feet between horse corrals (or similar equestrian facilities)and dwellings on neighboring properties per Section 17.08.030(E)(2)(b)of the Development Code. The reduction in the depth of the subject lots from 200 feet to 135 feet will not be in conflict with this requirement as it will be offset by the width of each lot. Each lot will be an average of approximately 175 feet wide; the minimum lot width in this development district is 90 feet.The applicant has demonstrated on the plans that horse corrals can be plotted such that they are 70 feet from the residence on the adjacent lot. Lots 1 and 5 will be 25,732 and 23,615 square foot in area, respectively, which will exceed the minimum lot area of 20,000 square feet applicable to the development district of the site; and e. That the granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health,safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The reduced depth of the subject lots will not affect the neighboring properties and/or property owners. Practical differences in the physical attributes/characteristics between the lots in the surrounding area and the subject lots will be limited. Separation between structures and common property lines will be consistent with existing residential development within this development district. The overall area of Lots 1 and 5 will be 25,732 and 23,615 square feet, respectively, similar to the lot areas of the neighboring properties to the west at 13186 Arapaho Road and at 6323 Choctaw Place are 22,165 and 21,162 square feet, respectively. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration,together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-27 VARIANCE DRC2019-00786 —W&W LAND DESIGN CONSULTANTS May 26, 2021 Page 4 findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act("CEQA"), an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project was prepared by Blodgett Baylosis Env. Planning and was peer-reviewed by The Altum Group, a consultant contracted by the City to review the report. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, it was determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. The mitigation measures that the applicant will be required to comply with will reduce potential project environmental impacts. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it,finds: (i)that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii)that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 774-4330. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF MAY 2021 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Tony Guglielmo, Chairman PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-27 VARIANCE DRC2019-00786 —W&W LAND DESIGN CONSULTANTS May 26, 2021 Page 5 ATTEST: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary I, Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary, of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 26th day of May 2021 by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: RESOLUTION NO. 21-28 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2019-00787, A REQUEST FOR AN INCREASE IN THE MAXIMUM WALL HEIGHT FROM 6 FEET TO 8 FEET ALONG THE SOUTHERN BOUNDARY OF THE PROJECT SITE, ADJACENT TO LOTS 4 AND 5, IN CONJUNCTION WITH A PROPOSED 5-LOT SUBDIVISION IN THE VERY LOW (VL) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, WITHIN THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED AT THE EAST TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD BETWEEN EAST AVENUE AND CHOCTAW PLACE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0225-181-73. A. Recitals. 1. W&W Land Design Consultants filed an application for Minor Exception DRC2019- 00787 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Minor Exception request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 12th day of May 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing and concluded said hearing to May 26, 2021. 3. On the 26th day of May 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded said hearing on that date. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on May 26, 2021, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a parcel located at the east terminus of Arapaho Road between East Avenue and Choctaw Place; and b. The application is related to Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20152 for the subdivision of 146,429 square feet (3.4 acres) into 5 residential lots; and C. The project site is a rectangular parcel with an overall area of approximately 3.4 acres. The overall dimensions of the site are approximately 442 feet deep (east to west) and 331 feet (north to south) and is currently vacant; and Exhibit C PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-28 ME DRC2019-00787—W&W LAND DESIGN SERVICES May 26, 2021 Page 2 d. The existing land uses on, and General Plan land use and zoning designations for, the project site and the surrounding properties (relative to the above-noted parcels) are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Vacant Very Low Very Low VL Residential District* North Single-Family Residences Very Low Very Low VL Residential District* South Single-Family Residences Very Low Very Low VL Residential District* East Single-Family Residence/ Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential District* Frontier Switching Station West Single-Family Residences Very Low Very Low VL Residential District* *Etiwanda Specific Plan .1 to 2 Units Per Acre and Equestrian Overlay e. The applicant is requesting a Minor Exception to allow the construction of combination walls (garden/screen walls on top of retaining walls) with a height of up to 8 feet adjacent to lots 4 and 5 within the subdivision; and f. Per Table 17.48.050-1 of the Development Code, the maximum wall height of fences and walls along the rear and interior property lines is 6 feet. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The Minor Exception is consistent with the General Plan any applicable specific plan or development agreement. The General Plan designation of the project site is Very Low (VL) Residential, and the zoning of the property is Very Low (VL) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan. The Minor Exception does not affect the General Plan designation, zoning designation, or the residential purpose of the project site; and b. The proposed development is compatible with the existing and proposed land uses in the surrounding area. The Minor Exception will not result in a substantially larger house, an increase in lot coverage, an increase in density, or adjustments to the physical lot area of the subject lots; and C. The proposed exception to the specific development standard(s) is necessary to allow creative design solutions compatible with the desires of the community and/or to accommodate unique site conditions. The proposed walls will be located generally where there are grade differences that warrant retaining walls. Generally, the natural terrain of the project site slopes from north to south. Therefore, the usual alternative, an earthen slope, is not practical because of the lack of available space in the side yards between the house and the property line wall; and d. The granting of the Minor Exception will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district, and will not be detrimental to public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious properties or improvements in the vicinity. The Minor Exception will allow the applicant to construct walls that will provide adequate property screening/security and usable yard area and are similar to other walls that PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-28 ME DRC2019-00787—W&W LAND DESIGN SERVICES May 26, 2021 Page 3 have been constructed for the same purpose because of similar site conditions. The walls will be consistent with the standards and guidelines of the City. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project was prepared by Blodgett Baylosis Env. Planning and was peer-reviewed by The Altum Group, a consultant contracted by the City to review the report. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, it was determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. The mitigation measures that the applicant will be required to comply with will reduce potential project environmental impacts. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i)that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 774-4330. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-28 ME DRC2019-00787 —W&W LAND DESIGN SERVICES May 26, 2021 Page 4 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF MAY 2021. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Tony Guglielmo, Chairman ATTEST: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary I, Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 26th day of May 2021, by the following vote-to- wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Conditions of Approval RANCHO CUCAMONGA Community Development Department Project#: SUBTT20152 DRC2019-00786, DRC2019-00787, DRC2019-00971 Project Name: Arapaho Road - 5 Lot Subdivision Location: 6334 EAST AVE - 022518173-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Minor Exception, Sign Permit Notice of Filing, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. All conditions of approval for Design Review DRC2014-00425 shall apply to SUBTT20152. Standard Conditions of Approval 2. The applicant shall sign the Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval provided by the Planning Department. The signed Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval shall be returned to the Planning Department prior to the submittal of grading/construction plans for plan check, request for a business license, and/or commencement of the approved activity. 3. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 4. Approval of Tentative Tract No. SUBTT20152 is granted subject to the approval of Variance DRC2019-00786. 5. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval or Approval Letter, Conditions of Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 6. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption and Mitigated Negative Declaration fee in the amount of $2,530.25. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing. 7. This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the Engineering Services Department within 3 years from the date of the approval. 8. Access gates to the rear yards shall be constructed from a material more durable than wood gates. Acceptable materials include, but are not limited to, wrought iron and PVC. 9. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. Exhibit D www.CityofRC.us Printed:3/24/2021 Project#: SUBTT20152 DRC2019-00786, DRC2019-00787, DRC2019-00971 Project Name: Arapaho Road - 5 Lot Subdivision Location: 6334 EAST AVE - 022518173-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Minor Exception, Sign Permit Notice of Filing, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 10. Construct block walls between homes (i.e., along interior side and rear property lines), rather than wood fencing for permanence, durability, and design consistency. 11. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination and in conformance with Building and Safety Services Department standards, the Municipal Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department (RCFD) Standards. 12. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) shall not prohibit the keeping the equine animals where zoning requirements for the keeping of said animals have been met. Individual lot owners in subdivisions shall have the option of keeping said animals without the necessity of appealing to boards of directors of homeowners' associations for amendments to the CC&Rs. 13. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Services Department and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer. The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning Department a list of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes. 14. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all lots for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department approval; including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing. 15. Provide a 24-foot by 24-foot or 12-foot by 48-foot corral area in the rear yard adjacent to the Local Feeder Trail. Grade access from corral to trail with a maximum slope of 5:1 and a minimum width of 10 feet. 16. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, the Development Code regulations and the Etiwanda Specific Plan. 17. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 18. On corner side yards, provide minimum 5-foot setback between walls/fences and sidewalk. The 5-foot wall/fence setback and the parkway shall have landscape and irrigation in addition to the required street trees. Detailed landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. The parkway landscaping including trees, shrubs, ground covers and irrigation shall be maintained by the property owner. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the parkway maintenance requirement, in a standard format as determined by the Planning Director, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. www.CityofRC.us Printed:3/24/2021 Page 2 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20152 DRC2019-00786, DRC2019-00787, DRC2019-00971 Project Name: Arapaho Road - 5 Lot Subdivision Location: 6334 EAST AVE - 022518173-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Minor Exception, Sign Permit Notice of Filing, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 19. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 20. Local Feeder Trail entrances shall also provide access for service vehicles, such as veterinarians or hay deliveries, including a 12-foot minimum drive approach. Entrance shall be gated provided that equestrian access is maintained through step-throughs in accordance with Engineering Services Department Standard Drawing 1006-B and 1007-B. 21. Local Feeder Trail grades shall not exceed 0.5 percent at the downstream end of a trail for a distance of 25 feet behind the public right-of-way line to prohibit trail debris from reaching the street. Drainage devices may be required by the Building and Safety Official. 22. Where corner side, interior side or rear yard property lines are adjacent to local equestrian trails, construct minimum 6-foot high decorative masonry walls. Decorative masonry shall mean split-face double sided block, 'slump stone' or an alternative material that is acceptable to the Design Review Committee. 23. For single-family residential development within the Equestrian/Rural Overlay District, at least one model home shall be provided with a constructed 24-foot by 24-foot corral with appropriate fencing. 24. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 25. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double wall condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owners at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/fences along the project perimeter. 26. For residential development, return walls and corner side walls shall be decorative masonry. 27. For single-family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer. Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Department to determine that they are in satisfactory condition. 28. Front yard and corner side yard landscaping and irrigation shall be required per the Development Code and/or This requirement shall be in addition to the required street trees and slope planting. 29. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits for the development or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. For development occurring in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, the landscape plans will also be reviewed by Fire Construction Services. www.CityofRC.us Printed:3/24/2021 Page 3 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20152 DRC2019-00786, DRC2019-00787, DRC2019-00971 Project Name: Arapaho Road - 5 Lot Subdivision Location: 6334 EAST AVE - 022518173-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Minor Exception, Sign Permit Notice of Filing, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 30. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 31. All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than 2:1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 32. All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 33. Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. These criteria shall encourage the natural growth characteristics of the selected tree species. 34. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Services Department. 35. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of water efficient landscaping per Development Code Chapter 17.82. Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Arapaho Road frontage improvements shall be in accordance with "local" and Etiwanda Specific Plan standards as required and including A. Provide curb, gutter, sidewalk, streetlights, signing and striping and drive approaches. B. Street lights shall be owned by the City. Developers shall be responsible to coordinate and pay all costs to provide power on City owned street lights. Coordinate with City staff for design and installation requirements. C. Drive approach shall be in accordance with City Driveway Policy. 2. All driveway approaches shall be constructed per City Standards and City Policy. 3. Prior to the approval and recordation of the final map, CC&R's shall include the maintenance of the cross-lot drainage systems to be maintained by a homeowners association. 4. The final map shall delineate the private cross lot drainage easements. www.CityofRC.us Printed:3/24/2021 Page 4 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20152 DRC2019-00786, DRC2019-00787, DRC2019-00971 Project Name: Arapaho Road - 5 Lot Subdivision Location: 6334 EAST AVE - 022518173-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Minor Exception, Sign Permit Notice of Filing, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 5. On East Avenue, the existing under sidewalk drain near the Frontier Communications facility which discharges storm water flow from the south side of Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 16969 shall be reconstructed to City Plan No. 107-C. Street plan revisions shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval for this street improvement. On Arapaho road, the proposed under sidewalk drain for Lot 1 shall be City Plan No. 107-B. 6. The street lights shall be owned by the City. Developer shall be responsible to coordinate and pay all costs of street lights and to provide power to City owned street lights. 7. Prior to the approval of the final map, or issuance of a grading permit, the vehicular access to private local trails shall be from Local Streets. To prevent vehicles on local trails from entering a Community Trail, provide step-through per Std. Dwg. 1007 Standard Conditions of Approval 8. The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site property interests necessary to construct the required public improvements, and if he/she should fail to do so, the developer shall, at least 120 days prior to submittal of the final map for approval, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Government Code Sections 66462 and 66462.5 at such time as the City decides to acquire the property interests required for the improvements. Such agreement shall provide for payment by the developer of all costs incurred by the City if the City decides to acquire the off-site property interests required in connection with the subdivision. Security for a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the City, at developer's cost. The appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal. This condition applies in particular, but not limited to: PRIVATE STORM DRAIN EASEMENT. 9. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or noted on the final map. 10. Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets, community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, traffic signal encroachment and maintenance, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. Private easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc.) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. 11. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. 12. Public storm drain easements shall be graded to convey overflows in the event of a blockage in a sump catch basin on the public street, and provisions made to pass through walls. 13. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. www.CityofRC.us Printed:3/24/2021 Page 5 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20152 DRC2019-00786, DRC2019-00787, DRC2019-00971 Project Name: Arapaho Road - 5 Lot Subdivision Location: 6334 EAST AVE - 022518173-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Minor Exception, Sign Permit Notice of Filing, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 14. ** CD Information Required Prior to Sign-Off for Building Permit Prior to the issuance of building permits, if valuation is greater or equal to $100,000, a Diversion Deposit and a related administrative fee shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 65% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Applicant must identify if they are self-hauling or utilizing Burrtec prior to issuance of a building permit. Proof of diversion must be submitted to the Environmental Engineering Division within 60 days following the completion of the construction and /or demolition project. Contact Susan Shaker, Environmental Engineering, at (909) 774-4062 for more information. Instructions and forms are available at the City's website, www.cityofrc.us, under City Hall / Engineering / Environmental Programs/Construction & Demolition Diversion Program. 15. Prior to approval of the final map, a deposit shall be posted with the City covering the estimated cost of apportioning the assessments under Assessment District among the newly created parcels. The assessment districts the project will join are LIVID 7, SLD 1 and SLD 7. 16. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to Building Permit issuance if no map is involved. 17. Prior to finalization of any development phase, sufficient improvement plans shall be completed beyond the phase boundaries to assure secondary access and drainage protection to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Phase boundaries shall correspond to lot lines shown on the approved tentative map. 18. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. www.CityofRC.us Printed:3/24/2021 Page 6 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20152 DRC2019-00786, DRC2019-00787, DRC2019-00971 Project Name: Arapaho Road - 5 Lot Subdivision Location: 6334 EAST AVE - 022518173-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Minor Exception, Sign Permit Notice of Filing, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 19. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch pvc with pull rope or as specified. e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all corners of intersections per latest ADA standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Manager prior to submittal for first plan check. 20. Install fiber optic conduit, vaults, and manholes on Arapaho Road per Standard Drawings 135-137. Public improvement plans shall show the location and limits of the conduits, vaults and manholes with construction notes. www.CityofRC.us Printed:3/24/2021 Page 7 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20152 DRC2019-00786, DRC2019-00787, DRC2019-00971 Project Name: Arapaho Road - 5 Lot Subdivision Location: 6334 EAST AVE - 022518173-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Minor Exception, Sign Permit Notice of Filing, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 21. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Street Name: Arapaho Road Botanical Name: Lagerstroemia indica 'Muskogee' Common Name: Crape MyrtleMin. Grow Space: 2' Spacing: 20' O.C. Size 15 gallon Qty. 5 minimum Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1)All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 22. All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. 23. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. 24. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 25. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 26. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 27. Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&Rs or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the final map. www.CityofRC.us Printed:3/24/2021 Page 8 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20152 DRC2019-00786, DRC2019-00787, DRC2019-00971 Project Name: Arapaho Road - 5 Lot Subdivision Location: 6334 EAST AVE - 022518173-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Minor Exception, Sign Permit Notice of Filing, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 28. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. The assessment districts the project will join are LIVID 7, SLD 1, and SLD 7. 29. Add the following note to any private landscape plans that show street trees: "All improvements within the public right-of-way, including street trees, shall be installed per the public improvement plans." If there is a discrepancy between the public and private plans, the street improvement plans will govern. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout "Information for Grading Plans and Permit". 2. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code and/or the California Residential Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 3. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 4. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Engineering Services Department prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit. 6. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. All dust control sign(s) shall be located outside of the public right of way. 7. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Engineering Services Department for review, the rough grading plan shall be a separate plan submittal and permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 8. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall(s) on property line(s) or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. www.CityofRC.us Printed:3/24/2021 Page 9 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20152 DRC2019-00786, DRC2019-00787, DRC2019-00971 Project Name: Arapaho Road - 5 Lot Subdivision Location: 6334 EAST AVE - 022518173-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Minor Exception, Sign Permit Notice of Filing, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 9. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the grading plan shall show that all manufactured slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way, permitted line, or the adjacent private property. All slope offsets shall meet the requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 10. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the City Engineer or his designee.. 11. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond project boundary. 12. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over-excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 13. Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, the permitted grading plan (or architectural site plan) set shall show in each of the typical sections and the plan view show how the separations between the building exterior and exterior ground surface meet the requirements of Sections CBC1804.3/CRC R401.3, CBC2304.11.2.2/CRC R317.1(2) and CBC2512.1.2/CRC R703.6.2.1 of the current adopted California Building Code/Residential Code. 14. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall obtain a signed and notarized letter from the adjacent property owner(s) for ALL work proposed on the adjacent property. The letter shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set. The letter shall show on either the title sheet or a detail sheet of the grading and drainage plan set. 15. The proposed on-site wastewater treatment (septic) system (OWTS) shall be located in the front yard to allow a future connection to a public sewer main. 16. Prior to approval of the project-specific storm water quality management plan, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer, or his designee, a precise grading plan showing the location and elevations of existing topographical features, and showing the location and proposed elevations of proposed structures and drainage of the site. www.CityofRC.us Printed:3/24/2021 Page 10 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20152 DRC2019-00786, DRC2019-00787, DRC2019-00971 Project Name: Arapaho Road - 5 Lot Subdivision Location: 6334 EAST AVE - 022518173-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Minor Exception, Sign Permit Notice of Filing, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 17. DESIGN ISSUE; The average high ground water level for the subject property is 265-feet below the surface of the ground. Therefore prior to the issuance of any grading and/or building permit, the applicant shall provide, as a project condition of approval, a separate Private On-Site Wastewater Treatment (septic) System (OWTS) plan showing the maximum depth of any proposed seepage pits to be a minimum 10-feet above the average high ground water level. 18. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the grading and drainage plan shall show the following information in the equestrian trails: — Provide PVC fencing per city standards, provide a 4" thick decomposed granite (DG) surface, provide a drainage V ditch parallel to the trail, provide a bridge over the V ditch where necessary for access to corals, and gates to corrals. The equestrian bridges shall be capable of carrying vehicle loads where necessary. Where the longitudinal slope (s) is S< 5% the cross fall shall be 2%, if S>5% the cross fall may be 4% maximum. Where water bars required, the spacing for the water bars is: 50' maximum for longitudinal slopes of 4% to 6%, 40' maximum for longitudinal slopes of 6.1% to 9%, 30' maximum for longitudinal slopes of 9.1% to 12%, 20' maximum for longitudinal slopes greater than 12%. In the equestrian trails water bars shall also be placed at the top and bottom of the trail where the gradient of the trail changes, i.e. a steep downhill slope which will cause additional erosion to the trail. 19. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Engineering Services Department for review and approval for on-site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. The report shall contain water surface profile gradient calculations for all storm drain pipes 12-inches and larger in diameter, and all cross-lot concrete V-ditches. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. In addition, the project specific drainage study shall provide inlet calculations showing the proper sizing of the water quality management plan storm water flows into the proposed structural storm water treatment devices. 20. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage acceptance easements(s) from adjacent downstream property owner(s) or discharge flows in a natural condition (concentrated flows are not accepted) and shall provide the City Engineer, or his designee, a drainage study showing the proposed flows do not exceed the existing flows prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit. This condition of approval specifically applies to the storm water draining through the existing Frontier Communications facility. 21. The site shall be rough graded to eliminate all cross-lot drainage, (except in approved facilities adjacent to private trails, or private cross lot drainage easements shown on the final map). All slopes and retaining walls necessary to accomplish this shall be installed prior to final map approval. 22. Flow lines steeper than 6 percent could be erosive. The applicant shall provide hard lined gutters and swales where concentrated flows exceed 3fps, and anywhere that flow lines exceed 10 percent. This shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan prior to issuance of a grading permit. www.CityofRC.us Printed:3/24/2021 Page 11 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20152 DRC2019-00786, DRC2019-00787, DRC2019-00971 Project Name: Arapaho Road - 5 Lot Subdivision Location: 6334 EAST AVE - 022518173-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Minor Exception, Sign Permit Notice of Filing, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 23. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall demonstrate that the storm water run-off will not adversely affect the downstream properties and that the water may legally discharge to the downstream properties. The engineer of record shall show on the final permitted grading and drainage plan one (1) or more of the following items are met: a) There is sufficient downstream capacity to accept the proposed storm water flows and that the downstream property owner have provided permission to accept the upstream storm water flows; b) a legal document/entity exists allowing developed storm water flows to be discharged to the property lower in elevation; c) a storm drain system to safely convey the storm water flows to a public storm drain system without causing flooding to adjacent property(ies). 24. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution 92-17, if a lot may not directly drain off-site directly to the street or other acceptable drainage device (such as a drainage ditch adjacent to an equestrian trail), then: a) drainage may flow from only one lot onto only one other lot; b) a drainage easement shall be provided over the lot accepting the drainage; c) the drainage shall be contained within either a concrete/rock lined swale/channel or a reinforced concrete pipe; and d) the drainage shall be designed with excess capacity to account for the probable lack of necessary maintenance, therefore, it shall be designed to convey two (2) times the runoff from a 100-year storm event with the minimum diameter of the pipe being 12-inches. 25. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the latest adopted California Plumbing Code. Private storm drain improvements shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan. 26. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy or final sign off by the Building Inspector the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) storm water treatment devices and best management practices (BMP). 27. Prior to approval of the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), the WQMP shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 28. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment devices and best management practices (BMP) as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan, shall be provided for by CC&R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the approval of the Water Quality Management Plan. Said CC&R's and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. 29. Prior to the issuance of a rough or precise Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Engineer, or his designee, and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 30. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID). The WDID number shall also be shown on the WQMP Site and Drainage Plan document. www.CityofRC.us Printed:3/24/2021 Page 12 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20152 DRC2019-00786, DRC2019-00787, DRC2019-00971 Project Name: Arapaho Road - 5 Lot Subdivision Location: 6334 EAST AVE - 022518173-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Minor Exception, Sign Permit Notice of Filing, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 31. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment best management practices (BMP) devices, as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan, shall be provided for by CC&R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the issuance a grading permit. Said CC&R's and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. 32. The Homeowner's Association (HOA) shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the structural storm water treatment devices, commonly referred to as BMPs, to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The HOA shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the HOA. 33. The Homeowner's Association (HOA) shall follow the inspection and maintenance requirements of the approved project specific Water Quality Management Plan and shall provide a copy of the inspection reports on a biennial basis to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. 34. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, building permit or Engineering Services Department issued right of way permit, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer, or his designee, a final project specific water quality management plan for review and approval, and shall have said document recorded with the San Bernardino County Recorder's Office. 35. The final project-specific water quality management plan (WQMP) shall include executed maintenance agreements along with the maintenance guidelines for all proprietary structural storm water treatment devices (BMP's). In the event the applicant cannot get the proprietary device maintenance agreements executed prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant is required to submit a letter to be included within the WQMP document, and scanned and pasted onto the Site and Drainage Plan which states that prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy with applicant shall enter into a contract for the maintenance of the proprietary storm water treatment device. If the proprietary storm water treatment device is part of a residential subdivision, prior to the sale of the residential lot, the developer shall include maintenance agreement(s) as part of the sale of the residential lot to the buyer. A copy of the maintenance agreements to be included in the sale of the property shall be included within the WQMP document. 36. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and approval of the project specific water quality management plan all private storm water catch basin inlets shall include insert filters to capture those pollutants of concern as addressed in the in the final project-specific water quality management plan (WQMP). At a minimum catch basin insert filters to capture trash and other floating debris. All catch basin insert filters shall be maintained on a regular basis as described in the "Inspection and Maintenance Responsibility for Post Construction BMP" section of the final project-specific water quality management plan. www.CityofRC.us Printed:3/24/2021 Page 13 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20152 DRC2019-00786, DRC2019-00787, DRC2019-00971 Project Name: Arapaho Road - 5 Lot Subdivision Location: 6334 EAST AVE - 022518173-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Minor Exception, Sign Permit Notice of Filing, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 37. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Project-Specific Water Quality Management Plan shall include a completed copy of "Worksheet H: Factor of Safety and Design Infiltration Worksheet" located in Appendix D "Section VII — Infiltration Rate Evaluation Protocol and Factor of Safety Recommendations, ..." of the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans. The infiltration study shall include the Soil Engineer's recommendations for Appendix D, Table VII.3: Suitability Assessment Related Considerations for Infiltration Facility Safety Factors". 38. Prior to approval of the final project-specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project-specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans". 39. The subject project, shall accept all existing off-site storm water drainage flows and safely convey those flows through or around the project site. If existing off-site storm water drainage flows mix with any on-site storm water drainage flows, then the off-site storm water drainage flows shall be treated with the on-site storm water drainage flows for storm water quality purposes, prior to discharging the storm water drainage flows from the project site. NOTE: This specifically occurs along the north tract boundary adjacent to the Community Trail. This project shall not cause flooding on the adjacent Community Trail, and shall have a design shown to accept any off-site upstream storm water flows. 40. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy by the Building Official, or his designee, the civil engineer of record shall file a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Post Construction Storm Water Treatment Devices As-Built Certificate with the Environmental Programs Coordinator, City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Services Department. www.CityofRC.us Printed:3/24/2021 Page 14 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20152 DRC2019-00786, DRC2019-00787, DRC2019-00971 Project Name: Arapaho Road - 5 Lot Subdivision Location: 6334 EAST AVE - 022518173-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Minor Exception, Sign Permit Notice of Filing, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 41. GROUND WATER PROTECTION: Prior to approval of the final project specific water quality management plan (WQMP), the WQMP document shall meet the requirements of the State Water Resources Control Board Order No. R8-2010-0036 (NPDES No. CAS 618036), the San Bernardino County Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Separation (MS4) Permit reads: Section XI.D(Water Quality Management Plan Requirements).8(Groundwater Protection): Treatment Control BMPs utilizing infiltration [exclusive of incidental infiltration and BMPs not designed to primarily function as infiltration devices (such as grassy swales, detention basins, vegetated buffer strips, constructed wetlands, etc.)] must comply with the following minimum requirements to protect groundwater: a. Use of structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause or contribute to an exceedance of ground water quality objectives. b. Source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration should be evaluated prior to infiltration. c. Adequate pretreatment of runoff prior to infiltration shall be required in gas stations and large commercial parking lots. (NOTE: The State Water Quality Control Board defines a large commercial parking lot as `100,000 sq. ft. or more of commercial development to include parking lot (with 100 or more vehicle traffics), OR, by means of 5,000sgft or more of allowable space designated for parking purposes'). d. Unless adequate pre-treatment of runoff is provided prior to infiltration structural infiltration treatment BMPs must not be used for areas of industrial or light industrial activity{77), areas subject to high vehicular traffic (25,000 or more daily traffic); car washes; fleet storage areas; nurseries; or any other high threat to water quality land uses or activities. e. Class V injection wells or dry wells must not be placed in areas subject to vehicular{78} repair or maintenance activities{79}, such as an auto body repair shop, automotive repair shop, new and used car dealership, specialty repair shop (e.g., transmission and muffler repair shop) or any facility that does any vehicular repair work. f. Structural infiltration BMP treatment shall not be used at sites that are known to have soil and groundwater contamination. g. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall be located at least 100 feet horizontally from any water supply wells. h. The vertical distance from the bottom of any infiltration structural treatment BMP to the historic high groundwater mark shall be at least 10-feet. Where the groundwater basins do not support beneficial uses, this vertical distance criteria may be reduced, provided groundwater quality is maintained. i. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause a nuisance or pollution as defined in Water Code Section 13050. www.CityofRC.us Printed:3/24/2021 Page 15 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20152 DRC2019-00786, DRC2019-00787, DRC2019-00971 Project Name: Arapaho Road - 5 Lot Subdivision Location: 6334 EAST AVE - 022518173-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Minor Exception, Sign Permit Notice of Filing, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 42. Prior to approval of the final project-specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project-specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans". Note: As this project has been previously graded and the site soils have been compacted for building pads, the use of the Custom Soil Resource Report for San Bernardino County Southwestern Part by the United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resource Conservation Service for natural soils is not acceptable for soil groundwater infiltration rates. Note: A current infiltration report will be required for this project as the project has been rough graded under a previous permit. 43. Prior to the issuance of a rough or precise grading permit, the applicant shall provide to the City Engineer, or his designee, for reference, a copy of the separate On-site Wastewater Treatment System (OWTS) plans for reference with the submittal of the precise grading plan. The separately permitted OWTS shall be submitted to the City Engineer, or designee, for review and permitting. The OWTS shall meet the requirements of adopted Local Agency Management Program for On-Site Wastewater Treatment Systems (LAMP OWTS), effective September 17, 2018 which will require site specific percolation testing which may reduce the required seepage pit depth. A copy of the LAMP OWTS is available on the Building and Safety webpage. 44. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit for this development, the applicant shall provide to the City Engineer, or his designee, for reference a copy of the separate On-site Wastewater Treatment System (OWTS) plans for reference with the submittal of the precise grading plan. The separately permitted OWTS shall be submitted to the Building Official for review and permitting. The OWTS shall meet the requirements of adopted Local Agency Management Program for On-Site Wastewater Treatment Systems (LAMP OWTS), effective September 17, 2018 which will require site specific percolation testing which may reduce the required seepage pit depth. A copy of the LAMP OWTS is available on the Building and Safety webpage. 45. The permitted grading plan and the final project-specific water quality management plan are proposing stormwater detention basin (commonly referred to as BMPs) for the treatment of storm water runoff as required in the current adopted Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Systems (MS4) Permit. The depth of the proposed retained water equals or exceeds 18-inches. Therefore prior to the issuance of a grading permit and approval of the final project-specific water quality management plan the applicant shall show a barrier a minimum of 60-inches above the finished ground surface. 46. Prior to the approval of the final project-specific water quality management plan (WQMP), the WQMP shall show the locations of the equestrian corrals which meet the City's current Development Code requirements. Each equestrian corral shall have a storm water (BMP) provided to treat storm water runoff from the corral. 47. The proposed storm water BMP infiltration basin is showing an overflow pipe along the southside of the project. The project drainage (hydrology/hydraulics) study shall provide hydraulic calculations for the pipe. The pipe shall also be shown in a plan and profile view on the permitted grading plan set showing a water surface profile gradient. The pipe shall be capable of withstanding H-10 vehicle loads. www.CityofRC.us Printed:3/24/2021 Page 16 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20152 DRC2019-00786, DRC2019-00787, DRC2019-00971 Project Name: Arapaho Road - 5 Lot Subdivision Location: 6334 EAST AVE - 022518173-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Minor Exception, Sign Permit Notice of Filing, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section www.CityofRC.us Printed:3/24/2021 Page 17 of 17 Planning Department Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval for SUBTT20152 I, Winston Liu, as applicant for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20152, hereby state that I am in agreement with and accept the conditions of approval for the subject tentative tract map located at APN: 0225-181-73 in Rancho Cucamonga, California, as adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on May 26, 2021 and as listed below and attached. Applicant Signature Date Conditions of Approval 1. The applicant shall sign the Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval provided by the Planning Department. The signed Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval shall be returned to the Planning Department prior to the submittal of grading/construction plans for plan check, request for a business license, and/or commencement of the approved activity. 2. All conditions of approval attached to Resolution of Approval No. 21-26 for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20152 shall apply. Exhibit E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Olt, - JM DATE: May 26, 2021 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Planning Director INITIATED BY: Tabe van der Zwaag SUBJECT: LOCATED BETWEEN EAST AVENUE AND GOLDEN LOCK PLACE APPROXIMATELY 400 FEET SOUTH OF BANYAN STREET— MANNING HOMES - A request to subdivide 10.24 acres of land into 17 lots including the Design Review of 17 single-family residences, a Minor Exception for increased wall heights and a Tree Removal Permit to remove onsite trees for a project site in the Very Low (VL) Residential District (.1 - 2 Dwelling Units per Acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan and the Equestrian Overlay District. Tentative Tract Map, Design Review, Minor Exception & Tree Removal Permit; APNs: 0225-191-09 and -17. A Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts was prepared for consideration (SUBTT20334, DRC2020-00139, DRC2020-00141, DRC2020-00140). (Planning Commission directed staff to bring back the Resolution of Approval - continued from May 12, 2021 PC Meeting.) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission take the following action: • Approve Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20334, Design Review DRC2020-00139, Minor Exception DRC2020- 00141, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2020-00140 through the adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval with Conditions. BACKGROUND: On May 12, 2021, the Planning Commission reviewed the project and recommended that resolutions of approval for the project be placed on the next Planning Commission agenda for their review and approval. Exhibit A— SUBTT20334 TTM Resolution 21-25 Exhibit B — DRC2020-00139 DR Resolution 21-32 Exhibit C — DRC2020-00141 ME Resolution 21-33 Exhibit D — DRC2020-00140 TRP Resolution 21-34 Exhibit E — Condition of Approval Exhibit F — Statement of Agreement Page 1 of 1 RESOLUTION NO. 21-25 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT20334, A REQUEST TO SUBDIVIDE 10.24 ACRES OF LAND INTO 17 LOTS FOR A PROJECT SITE LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF EAST AVENUE AND SOUTH OF BANYAN STREET IN THE VERY LOW (VL) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (.1 - 2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AND THE EQUESTRIAN OVERLAY DISTRICT; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF — APNs: 0225-191-09 and -17. A. Recitals. 1. Manning Homes filed an application for the issuance of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20334, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution,the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 12th day of May 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing and continued said hearing to May 26. 2021. 3. On the 26th day of May 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded said hearing on that date. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting on May 26, 2021, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a vacant parcel located east side of East Avenue, west of Golden Lock Place, and south of Banyan Street; and b. The project site is a vacant parcel with an area of approximately 10.4 acres. The overall dimensions of the site are approximately 1,020 feet (east to west) along the north property line, 1,199 feet along the south property line, 255 feet(north to south)along the west property line, and 378 feet along the east property line; and C. The existing land uses on, and General Plan land use and zoning designations for, the project site and the surrounding properties (relative to the above-noted parcels)are as follows: Exhibit A PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-25 TTM SUBTT20334 — MANNING HOMES May 26, 2021 Page 2 Land Use General Zoning Plan Site Vacant Parcel Very Low Very Low VL Residential District* North Single-Family Residence Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential District* Vacant Lot South Single-Family Residence Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential District* Vacant Lot East Single-Family Residences Very Low Very Low VL Residential District* West I Single-Family Residences Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential District* 'Etiwanda Specific Plan & Equestrian Overlay District .1 -2 Dwelling Units per Acre d. The proposed tentative tract map includes 17 numbered lots and 4 lettered lots. The Lettered Lots(A-D)will be used as open space (including the required equestrian trail)and will be maintained by a Homeowner's Association; and e. The project complies with each of the development standards for the optional development standards of Etiwanda Specific Plan as shown in the table below: Required Proposed Compliant? Density Max 2 DU 1.66 Yes per Acre Street Setback 30 Feet Avg. 30 Feet Avg. Yes Building Separation 30 Feet Min. 30 Feet Yes Private Open Space 25 Percent Min. 25.7 Percent Yes Common Open 65 Percent Min. 67.1 Percent Yes Space Lot Size No Minimum 15,272 to 16,765 Square Ft. Yes* Lot Coverage No Minimum 29.6 Percent Yes *Lots under 20,000 square feet may not keep horses f. This application is in conjunction with Design Review DRC2020-00139, for the design of the 17 residences on the subject lots, Minor Exception DRC2020-00141, for increased wall heights due to onsite grades, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2020-00140,for the removal of up to 129 trees. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed development is in accord with the General Plan,the objectives of the Development Code and the Etiwanda Specific Plan, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. The proposal is to subdivide a property with an area of approximately 10.24 acres of land into seventeen (17) lots for the development of 17 single-family residences. The underlying General Plan designation is Very Low Residential which is intended for the development of single- family residences with an overall density of .01 to 2 dwelling units per acre. The proposed project has a density of 1.66 units per acre; and b. The proposed subdivision complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code and the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The proposed development meets all PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-25 TTM SUBTT20334 — MANNING HOMES May 26, 2021 Page 3 standards outlined in the Development Code, the optional standards of the Etiwanda Specific Plan and the design and development standards and policies of the Planning Commission and the City, and C. The proposed development,together with the conditions applicable thereto,will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The project site is vacant;the proposed land use is consistent with the land uses within the vicinity where it is located and the expectations of the community. The zoning of the property and all surrounding properties is Very Low (VL) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration,together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act("CEQA"),the Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project was prepared by Applied Planning, Inc. and was peer-reviewed by The Altum Group, a consultant contracted by the City to review the report. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, it was determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. The mitigation measures that the applicant will be required to comply with will reduce potential project environmental impacts. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. No comments were received during the public comment period. A Mitigation Monitoring Program has also been prepared to ensure implementation of, and compliance with,the mitigation measures forthe project. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it,finds: (i)that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii)that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-25 TTM SUBTT20334 — MANNING HOMES May 26, 2021 Page 4 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 774-4330. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF MAY 2021. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Tony Guglielmo, Chairman ATTEST: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary I, Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 26th day of May 2021, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: RESOLUTION NO. 21-32 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW DRC2020-00139, A REQUEST TO REVIEW THE SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURE OF 17 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCES RELATED TO THE SUBDIVISION OF10.24 ACRES OF LAND INTO 17 LOTS FOR A PROJECT SITE LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF EAST AVENUE AND SOUTH OF BANYAN STREET IN THE VERY LOW (VL) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (.1 - 2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AND THE EQUESTRIAN OVERLAY DISTRICT; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF —APNs: 0225-191-09 and - 17. A. Recitals. 1. Manning Homes filed an application for the issuance of Design Review DRC2020- 00139, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution,the subject Design Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 12th day of May 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing and continued said hearing May 26, 2021. 3. On the 26th day of May 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded said hearing on that date. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting on May 26, 2021, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a vacant parcel located east side of East Avenue, west of Golden Lock Place, and south of Banyan Street; and b. The project site is a vacant parcel with an area of approximately 10.4 acres. The overall dimensions of the site are approximately 1,020 feet (east to west) along the north property line, 1,199 feet along the south property line, 255 feet(north to south)along the west property line, and 378 feet along the east property line; and C. The existing land uses on, and General Plan land use and zoning designations for, the project site and the surrounding properties (relative to the above-noted parcels)are as follows: Exhibit B PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-32 DR DRC2020-00139 — MANNING HOMES May 26, 2021 Page 2 Land Use General Zoning Plan Site Vacant Parcel Very Low Very Low VL Residential District* North Single-Family Residence Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential District* Vacant Lot South Single-Family Residence Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential District* Vacant Lot East Single-Family Residences Very Low Very Low VL Residential District* West I Single-Family Residences Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential District* 'Etiwanda Specific Plan & Equestrian Overlay District .1 -2 Dwelling Units per Acre d. The related tentative tract map includes 17 numbered lots and 4 lettered lots. The Lettered Lots (A-D)will be used as open space (including the required equestrian trail) and will be maintained by a Homeowner's Association; and e. The project complies with each of the development standards for the optional development standards of Etiwanda Specific Plan as shown in the table below: Required Proposed Compliant? Density Max 2 DU 1.66 Yes per Acre Street Setback 30 Feet Avg. 30 Feet Avg. Yes Building Separation 30 Feet Min. 30 Feet Yes Private Open Space 25 Percent Min. 25.7 Percent Yes Common Open 65 Percent Min. 67.1 Percent Yes Space Lot Size No Minimum 15,272 to 16,765 Square Ft. Yes* Lot Coverage No Minimum 29.6 Percent Yes *Lots under 20,000 square feet may not keep horses f. This application is in conjunction with Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20334, for the subdivision of 10.24 acres of land in 17 residential lots, Minor Exception DRC2020-00141, for increased wall heights due to onsite grades, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2020-00140, for the removal of up to 129 trees. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan.The General Plan land use designation is Very Low, which permits the development of single-family residences with a maximum density of 2 units per acre. The project is for the development of single-family residences with a density of 1.66 units per acre; and b. The proposed use is in accord with the objective of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. The project site is within the Very Low (VL) Residential District The project complies with all the requirements of the Development Code and the optional standards of the Etiwanda Specific Plan except for wall height.The applicant has submitted a Minor Exception (DRC2020-00141) to permit walls up to 8 feet in height; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-32 DR DRC2020-00139 — MANNING HOMES May 26, 2021 Page 3 c. The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. The project complies with each of the requirements of the Development Code and the optional standards of the Etiwanda Specific Plan except for wall height. The applicant has submitted a Minor Exception (DRC2020-00141) to permit wall up to 8 feet in height; and d. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The project site is vacant; the proposed land use is consistent with the land uses within the vicinity where it is located and the expectations of the community. The zoning of the property and all surrounding properties is Very Low (VL) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included forthe environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act("CEQA"), the Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project was prepared by Applied Planning, Inc. and was peer-reviewed by The Altum Group, a consultant contracted by the City to review the report. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, it was determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. The mitigation measures that the applicant will be required to comply with will reduce potential project environmental impacts. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. No comments were received during the public comment period. A Mitigation Monitoring Program has also been prepared to ensure implementation of, and compliance with,the mitigation measures for the project. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i)that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program, and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-32 DR DRC2020-00139 — MANNING HOMES May 26, 2021 Page 4 Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 774-4330. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF MAY 2021. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Tony Guglielmo, Chairman ATTEST: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary I, Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 26th day of May 2021, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: RESOLUTION NO. 21-33 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2020-00141, A REQUEST FOR AN INCREASE IN THE MAXIMUM WALL HEIGHT FROM 6 FEET TO 8 FEET ALONG THE SOUTHERN BOUNDARY OF THE PROJECT SITE, IN CONJUNCTION WITH A PROPOSED 17-LOT SUBDIVISION IN THE VERY LOW (VL) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF EAST AVENUE AND SOUTH OF BANYAN STREET IN THE VERY LOW (VL) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (.1 - 2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AND THE EQUESTRIAN OVERLAY DISTRICT; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APNs: 0225-191-09 and -17. A. Recitals. 1. Manning Homes filed an application for Minor Exception DRC2020-00141 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Minor Exception request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 12th day of May 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing and continued said hearing to May 26, 2021. 3. On the 26th day of May 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded said hearing on that date. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on May 26, 2021, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a vacant parcel located east side of East Avenue, west of Golden Lock Place, and south of Banyan Street; and b. The project site is a vacant parcel with an area of approximately 10.4 acres. The overall dimensions of the site are approximately 1,020 feet (east to west) along the north property line, 1,199 feet along the south property line, 255 feet (north to south) along the west property line, and 378 feet along the east property line; and Exhibit C PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-33 ME DRC2020-00141 — MANNING HOMES May 26, 2021 Page 2 C. The existing land uses on, and General Plan land use and zoning designations for, the project site and the surrounding properties (relative to the above-noted parcels) are as follows: Land Use General Zoning Plan Site Vacant Parcel Very Low Very Low VL Residential District* North Single-Family Residence Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential District* Vacant Lot South Single-Family Residence Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential District* Vacant Lot East Single-Family Residences Very Low Very Low VL Residential District* West I Single-Family Residences I Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential District* *Etiwanda Specific Plan & Equestrian Overlay District(.1 -2 Dwelling Units per Acre) d. The applicant is requesting a Minor Exception to allow the construction of combination walls (garden/screen walls on top of retaining walls) with a height of up to 8 feet along the southern boundary of the project site; and e. Per Table 17.48.050-1 of the Development Code, the maximum wall height of fences and walls along the rear and interior property lines is 6 feet. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed development is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code and the Etiwanda Specific Plan, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. The General Plan designation of the project site is Very Low and the zoning of the property is Very Low (VL) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan. The Minor Exception does not affect the General Plan designation, zoning designation, or the residential purpose of the project site; and b. The proposed development is compatible with existing and proposed land uses in the surrounding area. The Minor Exception for additional wall height will not result in a substantially larger house, an increase in lot coverage, an increase in density, or adjustments to the physical lot area of the subject lots; and C. The proposed exception to the specific development standard(s) is necessary to allow creative design solutions compatible with the desires of the community and/or accommodate unique site conditions. The proposed walls will be located generally where there are grade differences that warrant retaining walls. Generally, the natural terrain of the project site slopes from north to south. Therefore, the usual alternative, an earthen slope, is not practical because of the lack of available space; and d. The granting of the minor exception will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district, and will not be detrimental to public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-33 ME DRC2020-00141 — MANNING HOMES May 26, 2021 Page 3 in the vicinity. The Minor Exception will allow the applicant to construct walls that will provide adequate property screening/security and usable yard area and are similar to other walls that have been constructed for the same purpose because of similar site conditions. The walls will be consistent with the standards and guidelines of the City. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), the Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project was prepared by Applied Planning, Inc. and was peer-reviewed by The Altum Group, a consultant contracted by the City to review the report. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, it was determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. The mitigation measures that the applicant will be required to comply with will reduce potential project environmental impacts. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. No comments were received during the public comment period. A Mitigation Monitoring Program has also been prepared to ensure implementation of, and compliance with, the mitigation measures for the project. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i)that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program, and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 774-4330. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-33 ME DRC2020-00141 — MANNING HOMES May 26, 2021 Page 4 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF MAY 2021. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Tony Guglielmo, Chairman ATTEST: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary I, Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 26th day of May 2021, by the following vote-to- wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: RESOLUTION NO. 21-34 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2020-00140, A REQUEST TO REMOVE UP TO 129 TREES, IN CONJUNCTION WITH A PROPOSED 17-LOT SUBDIVISION IN THE VERY LOW (VL) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF EAST AVENUE AND SOUTH OF BANYAN STREET IN THE VERY LOW (VL) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (.1 -2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AND THE EQUESTRIAN OVERLAY DISTRICT; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APNs: 0225-191-09 and -17. A. Recitals. 1. Manning Homes filed an application for Tree Removal Permit DRC2020-00040 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tree Removal Permit request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 12th day of May 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing and continued said hearing to May 26, 2021. 3. On the 26th day of May 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded said hearing on that date. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on May 26, 2021, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a vacant parcel located east side of East Avenue, west of Golden Lock Place, and south of Banyan Street; and b. The project site is a vacant parcel with an area of approximately 10.4 acres. The overall dimensions of the site are approximately 1,020 feet (east to west) along the north property line, 1,199 feet along the south property line, 255 feet (north to south) along the west property line, and 378 feet along the east property line; and C. The existing land uses on, and General Plan land use and zoning designations for, the project site and the surrounding properties (relative to the above-noted parcels) are as follows: Exhibit D PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-34 TRP DRC2020-00140 — MANNING HOMES May 26, 2021 Page 2 Land Use General Zoning Plan Site Vacant Parcel Very Low Very Low VL Residential District* North Single-Family Residence Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential District* Vacant Lot South Sin le-F mily Residence Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential District* Vacant Lot East Sin le-F mily Residences Very Low Very Low VL Residential District* West Single-Family Residences Very Low Very Low VL Residential District* *Etiwanda Specific Plan &Equestrian Overlay District .1 -2 Dwelling Units per Acre d. The applicant is requesting the removal of up to 129 trees, including live, standing dead, and stumps. An Arborist Report (Jim Borer, March 2, 2021) was submitted that reviews the health and condition of the onsite trees. The report concludes that based on poor health and improper pruning all the onsite trees except for four (4) existing street trees should be removed. The Landscape Plan for the project includes the planting of 236 trees including replacement eucalyptus windrows along the north and south property lines; and e. This application is in conjunction with Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20334, for the subdivision of 10.24 acres of land in 17 residential lots, Design Review DRC2020-00139, for the construction of 17 single-family residences, and Minor Exception DRC2020-00141, for increased wall heights due to onsite grades. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The removal of the trees is necessary due to the condition of the trees related to disease, danger of collapse, proximity to an existing structure, or interference with utility services; and b. The removal of the trees is necessary in order to construct improvements which will allow economic enjoyment of the property. The seven heritage trees on the project site are in conflict with the proposed development of 17 single-family residences on the project site; and C. The removal of the trees will not negatively impact the neighborhood, the established character of the area, and property values. The removal of the trees will not negatively impact the neighborhood or the character of the area as there are a large number of mature trees surrounding the project site. Additionally, the applicant will plant 236 replacement trees including eucalyptus windrows along the north and south property lines; and d. The removal of the trees is necessary to construct required improvements within the public street right-of-way or within a flood control or utility right-of-way. The removal of the subject trees is necessary to construct public improvements; and e. The trees cannot be preserved through pruning and proper maintenance or relocation. A large number of the trees are in poor condition or need to be removed due to conflict PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-34 TRP DRC2020-00140 — MANNING HOMES May 26, 2021 Page 3 with the proposed improvements related to the construction of the proposed 17-lot subdivision; and f. The trees do not constitute a significant natural resource in the city. The trees slated for removal do not constitute a significant natural resource as the trees in the surrounding area are not dependent for their survival or are they significant because of their size, species, location or aesthetic qualities; and g. Removal of the trees is not restricted by a Specific Plan, Community Plan, or condition of approval. The eucalyptus trees along the north and south property line are required to be replaced per the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The landscape plan submitted for the project includes planting replacement eucalyptus windrows along the north and south property lines; and h. Every effort has been made to incorporate the trees into the design of the project and the only appropriate alternative is the removal of the tree. The trees slated for removal are in conflict with the construction of on-site improvements and cannot be incorporated into the project; and i. The removal of the trees will not have a negative impact on the health, safety, or viability of surrounding trees, nor will it negatively impact the aesthetics or general welfare of the surrounding area. The project site is in an area with a large number of mature trees. The impact on the surrounding area will be minimal with the planting of 236 replacement trees. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), the Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project was prepared by Applied Planning, Inc. and was peer-reviewed by The Altum Group, a consultant contracted by the City to review the report. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, it was determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. The mitigation measures that the applicant will be required to comply with will reduce potential project environmental impacts. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. No comments were received during the public comment period. A Mitigation Monitoring Program has also been prepared to ensure implementation of, and compliance with, the mitigation measures for the project. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i)that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-34 TRP DRC2020-00140 — MANNING HOMES May 26, 2021 Page 4 Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program, and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 774-4330. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF MAY 2021. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Tony Guglielmo, Chairman ATTEST: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary I, Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 26th day of May 2021, by the following vote-to- wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-34 TRIP DRC2020-00140 — MANNING HOMES May 26, 2021 Page 5 ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Conditions of Approval RANCHO CUCAMONGA Community Development Department Project#: SUBTT20334 Project Name: EDR - East Ave. 17 Location: 6179 EAST AVE - 022519117-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. The step-through gates at each end of the trail should have a minimum of 36 inches between the wood bollards for easier equestrian access. 2. The proposed equestrian trail cannot be blocked permanently for any purpose. Standard Conditions of Approval 3. The applicant shall sign the Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval provided by the Planning Department. The signed Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval shall be returned to the Planning Department prior to the submittal of grading/construction plans for plan check, request for a business license, and/or commencement of the approved activity. 4. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 5. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval or Approval Letter, Conditions of Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 6. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption and Mitigated Negative Declaration fee in the amount of $2,530.25. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing. 7. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. Exhibit E www.CityofRC.us Printed:5/13/2021 Project#: SUBTT20334 Project Name: EDR - East Ave. 17 Location: 6179 EAST AVE - 022519117-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 8. If the project developer chooses to pay the in-lieu fee, the in-lieu art fee will be invoiced on the building permit by the City and shall be paid by the applicant prior to building permit issuance. If the project developer chooses to install art, they shall submit, during the plan check process, an application for the art work that will be installed on the project site that contains information applicable to the art work in addition to any other information as may be required by the City to adequately evaluate the proposed the art work in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 17.124. If the project developer chooses to donate art, applications for art work donated to the City shall be subject to review by the Public Art Committee which shall make a recommendation whether the proposed donation is consistent with Chapter 17.124 and final acceptance by the City Council. No final approval, such as a final inspection or the a issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, for any development project (or if a multi-phased project, the final phase of a development project) that is subject to this requirement shall occur unless the public art requirement has been fulfilled to the satisfaction of the Planning Department. 9. This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the Engineering Services Department within 3 years from the date of the approval. 10. Access gates to the rear yards shall be constructed from a material more durable than wood gates. Acceptable materials include, but are not limited to, wrought iron and PVC. 11. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 12. Construct block walls between homes (i.e., along interior side and rear property lines), rather than wood fencing for permanence, durability, and design consistency. 13. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination and in conformance with Building and Safety Services Department standards, the Municipal Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department (RCFD) Standards. 14. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Services Department and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer. The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning Department a list of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes. 15. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all lots for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department approval; including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing. www.CityofRC.us Printed:5/13/2021 Page 2 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20334 Project Name: EDR - East Ave. 17 Location: 6179 EAST AVE - 022519117-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 16. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, the Development Code regulations, and the Etiwanda Specific Plan. 17. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 18. A uniform hardscape and street furniture design including seating benches, trash receptacles, free-standing potted plants, bike racks, light bollards, etc., shall be utilized and be compatible with the architectural style. Detailed designs shall be submitted for Planning Department review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 19. On corner side yards, provide minimum 5-foot setback between walls/fences and sidewalk. The 5-foot wall/fence setback and the parkway shall have landscape and irrigation in addition to the required street trees. Detailed landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. The parkway landscaping including trees, shrubs, ground covers and irrigation shall be maintained by the property owner. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the parkway maintenance requirement, in a standard format as determined by the Planning Director, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 20. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 21. Local Feeder Trail entrances shall also provide access for service vehicles, such as veterinarians or hay deliveries, including a 12-foot minimum drive approach. Entrance shall be gated provided that equestrian access is maintained through step-throughs in accordance with Engineering Services Department Standard Drawing 1006-B and 1007-B. 22. Local Feeder Trail grades shall not exceed 0.5 percent at the downstream end of a trail for a distance of 25 feet behind the public right-of-way line to prohibit trail debris from reaching the street. Drainage devices may be required by the Building and Safety Official. 23. Where corner side, interior side or rear yard property lines are adjacent to local equestrian trails, construct minimum 6-foot high decorative masonry walls. Decorative masonry shall mean split-face double sided block, 'slump stone' or an alternative material that is acceptable to the Design Review Committee. 24. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. www.CityofRC.us Printed:5/13/2021 Page 3 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20334 Project Name: EDR - East Ave. 17 Location: 6179 EAST AVE - 022519117-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 25. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double wall condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owners at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/fences along the project perimeter. 26. Street names shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval in accordance with the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map 27. A detailed plan indicating trail widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing, and weed control, in accordance with City Master Trail drawings, shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to approval and recordation of the Final Tract Map and prior to approval of street improvement and grading plans. Developer shall upgrade and construct all trails, including fencing and drainage devices, in conjunction with street improvements. 28. For single-family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer. Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Department to determine that they are in satisfactory condition. 29. Front yard and corner side yard landscaping and irrigation shall be required per the Development Code and/or This requirement shall be in addition to the required street trees and slope planting. 30. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits for the development or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. For development occurring in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, the landscape plans will also be reviewed by Fire Construction Services. 31. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 32. All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than 2:1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 33. All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. www.CityofRC.us Printed:5/13/2021 Page 4 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20334 Project Name: EDR - East Ave. 17 Location: 6179 EAST AVE - 022519117-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 34. Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. These criteria shall encourage the natural growth characteristics of the selected tree species. 35. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of building. 36. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Services Department. 37. New windrow planting of Eucalyptus Maculata (Spotted Gum) is required. The size, spacing, staking, and irrigation of these trees shall be in conformance with the City's Development Code Chapter 17.80. 38. All dwellings shall have the front, side and rear elevations upgraded with architectural treatment, detailing and increased delineation of surface treatment subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. (DIF Fees) Development impact fees are due prior to issuance of a building permit or certificate of occupancy per the Engineering Fee schedule, Government Code Section 66000, et seq. and local ordinance. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d), the 90-day approval period in which the applicant may protest these fees will begin at the date the fees are invoiced. Protests must be made in writing and be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the close of business on the 90th day of the 90-day approval period. *Note that fees are subject to change annually. 2. Street Lights: The street lights along East Avenue shall be owned and maintained by the City. The street lights along the private street shall be owned and maintained by the private community. Developer shall be responsible to coordinate and pay all costs of street lights and to provide power to City owned street lights. www.CityofRC.us Printed:5/13/2021 Page 5 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20334 Project Name: EDR - East Ave. 17 Location: 6179 EAST AVE - 022519117-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 3. Rancho Fiber: - Place 14" conduit structure (Mainline) with high-density polyethylene (HDPE) at location in the public right of way or utility easement dedicated specifically to the Rancho Fiber project (on East Ave). This conduit system will be required to follow the joint trench distribution system within the project frontage where the conduit bank can be installed alongside the Telco and CATV conduits at the proper communication depth with 2 pullboxes installed on each end. - Place 1-2" conduit structure (Service) with high-density polyethylene (HDPE) directly from mainline along "A" Street to an 8" round plastic "flower pot" type telecom access box flush mounted to finish grade to serve as a drop access point to the city network directly at each individual residence. This drop conduit shall be dedicated for City fiber drop installation only. An Optical network demarcation enclosure/panel shall be mounted on the side of the home, garage or utility closet for the placement of a Fiber Optic Network Interface Device. Placement of a #6 solid ground wire placed from network demarcation enclosure to power ground or a power outlet is required. If no power ground exists a 5/8" x 8" copper clad ground rod is to be installed for ground wire to be connected. Standard Conditions of Approval 4. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or noted on the final map. 5. Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. 6. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. 7. Public storm drain easements shall be graded to convey overflows in the event of a blockage in a sump catch basin on the public street, and provisions made to pass through walls. 8. Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk. 9. ** CD Information Required Prior to Sign-Off for Building Permit Prior to the issuance of building permits, if valuation is greater or equal to $100,000, a Diversion Deposit and a related administrative fee shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 65% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Applicant must identify if they are self-hauling or utilizing Burrtec prior to issuance of a building permit. Proof of diversion must be submitted to the Environmental Engineering Division within 60 days following the completion of the construction and /or demolition project. Contact Marissa Ostos, Environmental Engineering, at (909) 774-4062 for more information. Instructions and forms are available at the City's website, www.cityofrc.us, under City Hall / Engineering / Environmental Programs/Construction & Demolition Diversion Program. www.CityofRC.us Printed:5/13/2021 Page 6 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20334 Project Name: EDR - East Ave. 17 Location: 6179 EAST AVE - 022519117-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 10. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to Building Permit issuance if no map is involved. 11. Add the following note to any private landscape plans that show street trees: "All improvements within the public right-of-way, including street trees, shall be installed per the public improvement plans." If there is a discrepancy between the public and private plans, the street improvement plans will govern. 12. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Street Name Curb & Gutter A.C. Pvmt Side-walk Drive Appr. Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Bike Trail Etc. Notes: (a) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. 13. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. www.CityofRC.us Printed:5/13/2021 Page 7 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20334 Project Name: EDR - East Ave. 17 Location: 6179 EAST AVE - 022519117-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 14. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, and street name signing shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. N/A e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all corners of intersections per latest ADA standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Manager prior to submittal for first plan check. www.CityofRC.us Printed:5/13/2021 Page 8 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20334 Project Name: EDR - East Ave. 17 Location: 6179 EAST AVE - 022519117-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 15. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Min. Grow Space Spacing Size Qty. Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1)All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 16. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. 17. Street improvement plans per City Standards for all private streets shall be provided for review and approval by the City Engineer. Prior to any work being performed on the private streets, fees shall be paid and construction permits shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. 18. All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. 19. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. 20. All required public landscaping and irrigation systems shall be continuously maintained by the developer until accepted by the City. www.CityofRC.us Printed:5/13/2021 Page 9 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20334 Project Name: EDR - East Ave. 17 Location: 6179 EAST AVE - 022519117-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 21. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts, and/or community facility district as determined by the finance department shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 22. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 23. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 24. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Gates installed across a residential emergency vehicle access road (fire lane) are required to be in accordance with Standard 5-3. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section. 2. The site/project is located in the designated Wildland-Urban Interface Fire Area. Please include this note on the plans. Construction materials and methods and automatic fire sprinkler systems are to be in compliance with Chapter 7A of the California Building Code, Section R337 of the California Residential Code, and Fire District Standard 49-1. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section. 3. The site/project is located in the designated Wildland-Urban Interface Fire Area. Please include this note on the plans. A site-specific or project-specific fire protection plan is required for this project. The fire protection plan is required to be in accordance with Fire District Standard 49-1. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section. Building and Safety Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions www.CityofRC.us Printed:5/13/2021 Page 10 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20334 Project Name: EDR - East Ave. 17 Location: 6179 EAST AVE - 022519117-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Building and Safety Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. When the Entitlement Review is approved submit complete construction drawings including T-24 Energy Calculations, Structural Calculations, and Soils Report to Building and Safety for plan review in accordance with the current edition of the California Building and Fire Codes including all local ordinances and standards. The new structures are required to be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers. This site is located in the fire area designated VHFHSZ, all structures must be constructed with ignition resistant or noncombustible materials in accordance with the approved Fire protection Plan and/or the most current edition of the California Building Code including all local ordinances and standards. Vegetation / Landscaping must be designed and installed in accordance to the guidelines from the RCFPD for sites located in the VHFHSZ fire area. Grading Section Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Prior to issuance of a wall permit, a copy of the Grading Special Conditions of Approval shall be included within the engineered wall plans and calculations. Standard Conditions of Approval 2. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code and/or the California Residential Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 3. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 4. A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 5. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Engineering Services Department prior to the issuance of building permits. 6. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit. 7. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. All dust control sign(s) shall be located outside of the public right of way. 8. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Engineering Services Department for review, the rough grading plan shall be a separate plan submittal and permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. www.CityofRC.us Printed:5/13/2021 Page 11 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20334 Project Name: EDR - East Ave. 17 Location: 6179 EAST AVE - 022519117-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 9. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on-site construction where possible, and shall provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 10. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the grading plan shall show that all manufactured slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way, permitted line, or the adjacent private property. All slope offsets shall meet the requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 11. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Engineering Services Department. 12. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout "Information for Grading Plans and Permit". 13. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over-excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 14. Prior to issuance of a wall permit, on engineered combination garden/retaining walls along the property boundary the structural calculations for the wall shall assume a level toe/heel at the adjacent off-site property (i.e. a manufactured slope is not present). This shall be shown in the typical sections of the grading and drainage plan. 15. Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, the permitted grading plan (or architectural site plan) set shall show in each of the typical sections and the plan view show how the separations between the building exterior and exterior ground surface meet the requirements of Sections CBC1804.3/CRC R401.3, CBC2304.11.2.2/CRC R317.1(2) and CBC2512.1.2/CRC R703.6.2.1 of the current adopted California Building Code/Residential Code. 16. Prior to approval of the project-specific storm water quality management plan, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer, or his designee, a precise grading plan showing the location and elevations of existing topographical features and showing the location and proposed elevations of proposed structures and drainage of the site. www.CityofRC.us Printed:5/13/2021 Page 12 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20334 Project Name: EDR - East Ave. 17 Location: 6179 EAST AVE - 022519117-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 17. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the grading and drainage plan shall show the following information in the equestrian trails: — Provide PVC fencing per city standards, provide a 4" thick decomposed granite (DG) surface, provide a drainage V ditch parallel to the trail, provide a bridge over the V ditch where necessary for access to corals, and gates to corrals. The equestrian bridges shall be capable of carrying vehicle loads where necessary. Where the longitudinal slope (s) is S< 5% the cross fall shall be 2%, if S>5% the cross fall may be 4% maximum. Where water bars required, the spacing for the water bars is: 50' maximum for longitudinal slopes of 4% to 6%, 40' maximum for longitudinal slopes of 6.1% to 9%, 30' maximum for longitudinal slopes of 9.1% to 12%, 20' maximum for longitudinal slopes greater than 12%. In the equestrian trails water bars shall also be placed at the top and bottom of the trail where the gradient of the trail changes, i.e. a steep downhill slope which will cause additional erosion to the trail. 18. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Engineering Services Department for review and approval for on-site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. The plan and report shall contain water surface profile gradient calculations for all storm drain pipes 12-inches and larger in diameter. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. In addition, the project specific drainage study shall provide inlet calculations showing the proper sizing of the water quality management plan storm water flows into the proposed structural storm water treatment devices. 19. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the latest adopted California Plumbing Code. Private storm drain improvements shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan. 20. Prior to approval of the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), the WQMP shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 21. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Engineering Services Department and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 22. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID). The WDID number shall also be shown on the WQMP Site and Drainage Plan document. 23. The applicant shall provide a copy of a completed EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) for each underground infiltration device, with the Facility ID Number assigned, to the Engineering Services Department Official prior to issuance of the Grading Permit and/or approval of the project-specific Water Quality Management Plan. A copy of EPA Form 7520-16 shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set, and a copy of said form shall be included in the project-specific Water Quality Management Plan. www.CityofRC.us Printed:5/13/2021 Page 13 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20334 Project Name: EDR - East Ave. 17 Location: 6179 EAST AVE - 022519117-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 24. The land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis for the Class V Injection Wells/underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best management practices (BMP"s) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 25. The applicant shall prepare or amend existing CC&R's as needed to clarify how maintenance responsibilities will be shared between the newly created parcels and the remaining existing parcels of Tract No. 20334 prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading and drainage plan and the CC&Rs shall address shared access to private street, private storm drains, storm water treatment devices, surface drainage and maintenance of common areas, including landscaping within public rights-of-way and Best Management Practices identified in the WQMP. 26. The HOA shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the structural storm water treatment devices, commonly referred to as BMPs, to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The HOA shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the HOA. 27. The HOA shall follow the inspection and maintenance requirements of the approved project specific Water Quality Management Plan and shall provide a copy of the inspection reports on a biennial basis to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. 28. A final project-specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be approved by the Engineering Director, or his designee, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit or any building permit. 29. Prior to the issuance of a building permit or Engineering Services Department issued right of way permit, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer, or designee, a final project specific water quality management plan for review and approval, and shall have said document recorded with the San Bernardino County Recorder's Office. 30. Prior to the start of landscaping operations, the landscape architect and the landscape contractor shall provide a sample of the weed fabric barrier to the Project Planner, City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The weed barrier shall be permeable. www.CityofRC.us Printed:5/13/2021 Page 14 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20334 Project Name: EDR - East Ave. 17 Location: 6179 EAST AVE - 022519117-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 31. The final project-specific water quality management plan (WQMP) shall include executed maintenance agreements along with the maintenance guidelines for all proprietary structural storm water treatment devices (BMP's). In the event the applicant cannot get the proprietary device maintenance agreements executed prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant is required to submit a letter to be included within the WQMP document, and scanned and pasted onto the Site and Drainage Plan which states that prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy with applicant shall enter into a contract for the maintenance of the proprietary storm water treatment device. If the proprietary storm water treatment device is part of a residential subdivision, prior to the sale of the residential lot, the developer shall include maintenance agreement(s) as part of the sale of the residential lot to the buyer. A copy of the maintenance agreements to be included in the sale of the property shall be included within the WQMP document. 32. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Project-Specific Water Quality Management Plan shall include a completed copy of "Worksheet H: Factor of Safety and Design Infiltration Worksheet" located in Appendix D "Section VII — Infiltration Rate Evaluation Protocol and Factor of Safety Recommendations, ..." of the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans. The infiltration study shall include the Soil Engineer's recommendations for Appendix D, Table VII.3: Suitability Assessment Related Considerations for Infiltration Facility Safety Factors". 33. Prior to approval of the final project-specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project-specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans". 34. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy by the Building Official, or his designee, the civil engineer of record shall file a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Post Construction Storm Water Treatment Devices As-Built Certificate with the Environmental Programs Coordinator, City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Services Department. 35. The subgrade for the permeable paver storm water treatment devices shall have a level subgrade. Prior to issuance of the grading permit and approval of the final project-specific water quality management plan (WQMP) the engineer of record shall provide a pad elevation for the permeable paver subgrade on the grading plan and shall provide a detail on the WQMP site and drainage plan showing the permeable paver subgrade as level. www.CityofRC.us Printed:5/13/2021 Page 15 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20334 Project Name: EDR - East Ave. 17 Location: 6179 EAST AVE - 022519117-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 36. GROUND WATER PROTECTION: Prior to approval of the final project specific water quality management plan (WQMP), the WQMP document shall meet the requirements of the State Water Resources Control Board Order No. R8-2010-0036 (NPDES No. CAS 618036), the San Bernardino County Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Separation (MS4) Permit reads: Section XI.D(Water Quality Management Plan Requirements).8(Groundwater Protection): Treatment Control BMPs utilizing infiltration [exclusive of incidental infiltration and BMPs not designed to primarily function as infiltration devices (such as grassy swales, detention basins, vegetated buffer strips, constructed wetlands, etc.)] must comply with the following minimum requirements to protect groundwater: a. Use of structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause or contribute to an exceedance of ground water quality objectives. b. Source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration should be evaluated prior to infiltration. c. Adequate pretreatment of runoff prior to infiltration shall be required in gas stations and large commercial parking lots. (NOTE: The State Water Quality Control Board defines a large commercial parking lot as `100,000 sq. ft. or more of commercial development to include parking lot (with 100 or more vehicle traffics), OR, by means of 5,000sgft or more of allowable space designated for parking purposes'). d. Unless adequate pre-treatment of runoff is provided prior to infiltration structural infiltration treatment BMPs must not be used for areas of industrial or light industrial activity{77), areas subject to high vehicular traffic (25,000 or more daily traffic); car washes; fleet storage areas; nurseries; or any other high threat to water quality land uses or activities. e. Class V injection wells or dry wells must not be placed in areas subject to vehicular{78} repair or maintenance activities{79}, such as an auto body repair shop, automotive repair shop, new and used car dealership, specialty repair shop (e.g., transmission and muffler repair shop) or any facility that does any vehicular repair work. f. Structural infiltration BMP treatment shall not be used at sites that are known to have soil and groundwater contamination. g. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall be located at least 100 feet horizontally from any water supply wells. h. The vertical distance from the bottom of any infiltration structural treatment BMP to the historic high groundwater mark shall be at least 10-feet. Where the groundwater basins do not support beneficial uses, this vertical distance criteria may be reduced, provided groundwater quality is maintained. i. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause a nuisance or pollution as defined in Water Code Section 13050. The final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan shall specifically address items (a,b,e,h,and i) above. www.CityofRC.us Printed:5/13/2021 Page 16 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20334 Project Name: EDR - East Ave. 17 Location: 6179 EAST AVE - 022519117-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 37. RESIDENTIAL MANDATORY MEASURES — CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE — Prior to the issuance of any building permit the applicant shall comply with Section 4.106.3 (Grading and Paving) of the current adopted California Green Building Standards Code: Construction plans shall indicate how the site grading or drainage system will manage all surface water flows to keep water from entering building. Examples of methods to manage surface water include, but are not limited to, the following: 1. Swales. 2. Water collection and disposal systems. 3. French drains. 4. Water retention gardens. 5. Other water measures which keep surface water away from buildings and aid in groundwater recharge. Exception: Additions and alterations not altering the drainage path. www.CityofRC.us Printed:5/13/2021 Page 17 of 17 Planning Department Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval for SUBTT20334 I, Craig Kozma, as applicant for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20334 and Design Review DRC2021- 00139, hereby state that I am in agreement with and accept the conditions of approval for the subject tentative tract map located at APNs: 0225-191-09 and -17 in Rancho Cucamonga, California, as adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on May 25, 2021 and as listed below and attached. Applicant Signature Date Conditions of Approval 1. The applicant shall sign the Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval provided by the Planning Department. The signed Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval shall be returned to the Planning Department prior to the submittal of grading/construction plans for plan check, request for a business license, and/or commencement of the approved activity. 2. All conditions of approval attached to Resolution of Approval No. 21-25 for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20334 and Design Review DRC2021-00139 shall apply. RESOLUTION NO. 21-25 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT20334, A REQUEST TO SUBDIVIDE 10.24 ACRES OF LAND INTO 17 LOTS FOR A PROJECT SITE LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF EAST AVENUE AND SOUTH OF BANYAN STREET IN THE VERY LOW (VL) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (.1 - 2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AND THE EQUESTRIAN OVERLAY DISTRICT; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF — APNs: 0225-191-09 and -17. A. Recitals. 1. Manning Homes filed an application for the issuance of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20334, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution,the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 12th day of May 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing and continued said hearing to May 26. 2021. 3. On the 26th day of May 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded said hearing on that date. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting on May 26, 2021, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a vacant parcel located east side of East Avenue, west of Golden Lock Place, and south of Banyan Street; and b. The project site is a vacant parcel with an area of approximately 10.4 acres. The overall dimensions of the site are approximately 1,020 feet (east to west) along the north property line, 1,199 feet along the south property line, 255 feet(north to south)along the west property line, and 378 feet along the east property line; and C. The existing land uses on, and General Plan land use and zoning designations for, the project site and the surrounding properties (relative to the above-noted parcels)are as follows: Exhibit A PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-25 TTM SUBTT20334 — MANNING HOMES May 26, 2021 Page 2 Land Use General Zoning Plan Site Vacant Parcel Very Low Very Low VL Residential District* North Single-Family Residence Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential District* Vacant Lot South Single-Family Residence Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential District* Vacant Lot East Single-Family Residences Very Low Very Low VL Residential District* West I Single-Family Residences Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential District* 'Etiwanda Specific Plan & Equestrian Overlay District .1 -2 Dwelling Units per Acre d. The proposed tentative tract map includes 17 numbered lots and 4 lettered lots. The Lettered Lots(A-D)will be used as open space (including the required equestrian trail)and will be maintained by a Homeowner's Association; and e. The project complies with each of the development standards for the optional development standards of Etiwanda Specific Plan as shown in the table below: Required Proposed Compliant? Density Max 2 DU 1.66 Yes per Acre Street Setback 30 Feet Avg. 30 Feet Avg. Yes Building Separation 30 Feet Min. 30 Feet Yes Private Open Space 25 Percent Min. 25.7 Percent Yes Common Open 65 Percent Min. 67.1 Percent Yes Space Lot Size No Minimum 15,272 to 16,765 Square Ft. Yes* Lot Coverage No Minimum 29.6 Percent Yes *Lots under 20,000 square feet may not keep horses f. This application is in conjunction with Design Review DRC2020-00139, for the design of the 17 residences on the subject lots, Minor Exception DRC2020-00141, for increased wall heights due to onsite grades, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2020-00140,for the removal of up to 129 trees. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed development is in accord with the General Plan,the objectives of the Development Code and the Etiwanda Specific Plan, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. The proposal is to subdivide a property with an area of approximately 10.24 acres of land into seventeen (17) lots for the development of 17 single-family residences. The underlying General Plan designation is Very Low Residential which is intended for the development of single- family residences with an overall density of .01 to 2 dwelling units per acre. The proposed project has a density of 1.66 units per acre; and b. The proposed subdivision complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code and the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The proposed development meets all PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-25 TTM SUBTT20334 — MANNING HOMES May 26, 2021 Page 3 standards outlined in the Development Code, the optional standards of the Etiwanda Specific Plan and the design and development standards and policies of the Planning Commission and the City, and C. The proposed development,together with the conditions applicable thereto,will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The project site is vacant;the proposed land use is consistent with the land uses within the vicinity where it is located and the expectations of the community. The zoning of the property and all surrounding properties is Very Low (VL) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration,together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act("CEQA"),the Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project was prepared by Applied Planning, Inc. and was peer-reviewed by The Altum Group, a consultant contracted by the City to review the report. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, it was determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. The mitigation measures that the applicant will be required to comply with will reduce potential project environmental impacts. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. No comments were received during the public comment period. A Mitigation Monitoring Program has also been prepared to ensure implementation of, and compliance with,the mitigation measures forthe project. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it,finds: (i)that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii)that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-25 TTM SUBTT20334 — MANNING HOMES May 26, 2021 Page 4 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 774-4330. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF MAY 2021. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Tony Guglielmo, Chairman ATTEST: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary I, Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 26th day of May 2021, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: RESOLUTION NO. 21-32 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW DRC2020-00139, A REQUEST TO REVIEW THE SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURE OF 17 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCES RELATED TO THE SUBDIVISION OF10.24 ACRES OF LAND INTO 17 LOTS FOR A PROJECT SITE LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF EAST AVENUE AND SOUTH OF BANYAN STREET IN THE VERY LOW (VL) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (.1 - 2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AND THE EQUESTRIAN OVERLAY DISTRICT; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF —APNs: 0225-191-09 and - 17. A. Recitals. 1. Manning Homes filed an application for the issuance of Design Review DRC2020- 00139, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution,the subject Design Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 12th day of May 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing and continued said hearing May 26, 2021. 3. On the 26th day of May 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded said hearing on that date. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting on May 26, 2021, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a vacant parcel located east side of East Avenue, west of Golden Lock Place, and south of Banyan Street; and b. The project site is a vacant parcel with an area of approximately 10.4 acres. The overall dimensions of the site are approximately 1,020 feet (east to west) along the north property line, 1,199 feet along the south property line, 255 feet(north to south)along the west property line, and 378 feet along the east property line; and C. The existing land uses on, and General Plan land use and zoning designations for, the project site and the surrounding properties (relative to the above-noted parcels)are as follows: Exhibit B PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-32 DR DRC2020-00139 — MANNING HOMES May 26, 2021 Page 2 Land Use General Zoning Plan Site Vacant Parcel Very Low Very Low VL Residential District* North Single-Family Residence Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential District* Vacant Lot South Single-Family Residence Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential District* Vacant Lot East Single-Family Residences Very Low Very Low VL Residential District* West I Single-Family Residences Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential District* 'Etiwanda Specific Plan & Equestrian Overlay District .1 -2 Dwelling Units per Acre d. The related tentative tract map includes 17 numbered lots and 4 lettered lots. The Lettered Lots (A-D)will be used as open space (including the required equestrian trail) and will be maintained by a Homeowner's Association; and e. The project complies with each of the development standards for the optional development standards of Etiwanda Specific Plan as shown in the table below: Required Proposed Compliant? Density Max 2 DU 1.66 Yes per Acre Street Setback 30 Feet Avg. 30 Feet Avg. Yes Building Separation 30 Feet Min. 30 Feet Yes Private Open Space 25 Percent Min. 25.7 Percent Yes Common Open 65 Percent Min. 67.1 Percent Yes Space Lot Size No Minimum 15,272 to 16,765 Square Ft. Yes* Lot Coverage No Minimum 29.6 Percent Yes *Lots under 20,000 square feet may not keep horses f. This application is in conjunction with Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20334, for the subdivision of 10.24 acres of land in 17 residential lots, Minor Exception DRC2020-00141, for increased wall heights due to onsite grades, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2020-00140, for the removal of up to 129 trees. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan.The General Plan land use designation is Very Low, which permits the development of single-family residences with a maximum density of 2 units per acre. The project is for the development of single-family residences with a density of 1.66 units per acre; and b. The proposed use is in accord with the objective of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. The project site is within the Very Low (VL) Residential District The project complies with all the requirements of the Development Code and the optional standards of the Etiwanda Specific Plan except for wall height.The applicant has submitted a Minor Exception (DRC2020-00141) to permit walls up to 8 feet in height; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-32 DR DRC2020-00139 — MANNING HOMES May 26, 2021 Page 3 c. The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. The project complies with each of the requirements of the Development Code and the optional standards of the Etiwanda Specific Plan except for wall height. The applicant has submitted a Minor Exception (DRC2020-00141) to permit wall up to 8 feet in height; and d. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The project site is vacant; the proposed land use is consistent with the land uses within the vicinity where it is located and the expectations of the community. The zoning of the property and all surrounding properties is Very Low (VL) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included forthe environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act("CEQA"), the Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project was prepared by Applied Planning, Inc. and was peer-reviewed by The Altum Group, a consultant contracted by the City to review the report. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, it was determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. The mitigation measures that the applicant will be required to comply with will reduce potential project environmental impacts. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. No comments were received during the public comment period. A Mitigation Monitoring Program has also been prepared to ensure implementation of, and compliance with,the mitigation measures for the project. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i)that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program, and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-32 DR DRC2020-00139 — MANNING HOMES May 26, 2021 Page 4 Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 774-4330. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF MAY 2021. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Tony Guglielmo, Chairman ATTEST: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary I, Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 26th day of May 2021, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: RESOLUTION NO. 21-33 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2020-00141, A REQUEST FOR AN INCREASE IN THE MAXIMUM WALL HEIGHT FROM 6 FEET TO 8 FEET ALONG THE SOUTHERN BOUNDARY OF THE PROJECT SITE, IN CONJUNCTION WITH A PROPOSED 17-LOT SUBDIVISION IN THE VERY LOW (VL) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF EAST AVENUE AND SOUTH OF BANYAN STREET IN THE VERY LOW (VL) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (.1 - 2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AND THE EQUESTRIAN OVERLAY DISTRICT; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APNs: 0225-191-09 and -17. A. Recitals. 1. Manning Homes filed an application for Minor Exception DRC2020-00141 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Minor Exception request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 12th day of May 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing and continued said hearing to May 26, 2021. 3. On the 26th day of May 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded said hearing on that date. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on May 26, 2021, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a vacant parcel located east side of East Avenue, west of Golden Lock Place, and south of Banyan Street; and b. The project site is a vacant parcel with an area of approximately 10.4 acres. The overall dimensions of the site are approximately 1,020 feet (east to west) along the north property line, 1,199 feet along the south property line, 255 feet (north to south) along the west property line, and 378 feet along the east property line; and Exhibit C PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-33 ME DRC2020-00141 — MANNING HOMES May 26, 2021 Page 2 C. The existing land uses on, and General Plan land use and zoning designations for, the project site and the surrounding properties (relative to the above-noted parcels) are as follows: Land Use General Zoning Plan Site Vacant Parcel Very Low Very Low VL Residential District* North Single-Family Residence Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential District* Vacant Lot South Single-Family Residence Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential District* Vacant Lot East Single-Family Residences Very Low Very Low VL Residential District* West I Single-Family Residences I Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential District* *Etiwanda Specific Plan & Equestrian Overlay District(.1 -2 Dwelling Units per Acre) d. The applicant is requesting a Minor Exception to allow the construction of combination walls (garden/screen walls on top of retaining walls) with a height of up to 8 feet along the southern boundary of the project site; and e. Per Table 17.48.050-1 of the Development Code, the maximum wall height of fences and walls along the rear and interior property lines is 6 feet. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed development is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code and the Etiwanda Specific Plan, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. The General Plan designation of the project site is Very Low and the zoning of the property is Very Low (VL) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan. The Minor Exception does not affect the General Plan designation, zoning designation, or the residential purpose of the project site; and b. The proposed development is compatible with existing and proposed land uses in the surrounding area. The Minor Exception for additional wall height will not result in a substantially larger house, an increase in lot coverage, an increase in density, or adjustments to the physical lot area of the subject lots; and C. The proposed exception to the specific development standard(s) is necessary to allow creative design solutions compatible with the desires of the community and/or accommodate unique site conditions. The proposed walls will be located generally where there are grade differences that warrant retaining walls. Generally, the natural terrain of the project site slopes from north to south. Therefore, the usual alternative, an earthen slope, is not practical because of the lack of available space; and d. The granting of the minor exception will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district, and will not be detrimental to public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-33 ME DRC2020-00141 — MANNING HOMES May 26, 2021 Page 3 in the vicinity. The Minor Exception will allow the applicant to construct walls that will provide adequate property screening/security and usable yard area and are similar to other walls that have been constructed for the same purpose because of similar site conditions. The walls will be consistent with the standards and guidelines of the City. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), the Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project was prepared by Applied Planning, Inc. and was peer-reviewed by The Altum Group, a consultant contracted by the City to review the report. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, it was determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. The mitigation measures that the applicant will be required to comply with will reduce potential project environmental impacts. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. No comments were received during the public comment period. A Mitigation Monitoring Program has also been prepared to ensure implementation of, and compliance with, the mitigation measures for the project. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i)that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program, and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 774-4330. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-33 ME DRC2020-00141 — MANNING HOMES May 26, 2021 Page 4 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF MAY 2021. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Tony Guglielmo, Chairman ATTEST: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary I, Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 26th day of May 2021, by the following vote-to- wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: RESOLUTION NO. 21-34 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2020-00140, A REQUEST TO REMOVE UP TO 129 TREES, IN CONJUNCTION WITH A PROPOSED 17-LOT SUBDIVISION IN THE VERY LOW (VL) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF EAST AVENUE AND SOUTH OF BANYAN STREET IN THE VERY LOW (VL) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (.1 -2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AND THE EQUESTRIAN OVERLAY DISTRICT; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APNs: 0225-191-09 and -17. A. Recitals. 1. Manning Homes filed an application for Tree Removal Permit DRC2020-00040 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tree Removal Permit request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 12th day of May 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing and continued said hearing to May 26, 2021. 3. On the 26th day of May 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded said hearing on that date. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on May 26, 2021, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a vacant parcel located east side of East Avenue, west of Golden Lock Place, and south of Banyan Street; and b. The project site is a vacant parcel with an area of approximately 10.4 acres. The overall dimensions of the site are approximately 1,020 feet (east to west) along the north property line, 1,199 feet along the south property line, 255 feet (north to south) along the west property line, and 378 feet along the east property line; and C. The existing land uses on, and General Plan land use and zoning designations for, the project site and the surrounding properties (relative to the above-noted parcels) are as follows: Exhibit D PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-34 TRP DRC2020-00140 — MANNING HOMES May 26, 2021 Page 2 Land Use General Zoning Plan Site Vacant Parcel Very Low Very Low VL Residential District* North Single-Family Residence Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential District* Vacant Lot South Sin le-F mily Residence Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential District* Vacant Lot East Sin le-F mily Residences Very Low Very Low VL Residential District* West Single-Family Residences Very Low Very Low VL Residential District* *Etiwanda Specific Plan &Equestrian Overlay District .1 -2 Dwelling Units per Acre d. The applicant is requesting the removal of up to 129 trees, including live, standing dead, and stumps. An Arborist Report (Jim Borer, March 2, 2021) was submitted that reviews the health and condition of the onsite trees. The report concludes that based on poor health and improper pruning all the onsite trees except for four (4) existing street trees should be removed. The Landscape Plan for the project includes the planting of 236 trees including replacement eucalyptus windrows along the north and south property lines; and e. This application is in conjunction with Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20334, for the subdivision of 10.24 acres of land in 17 residential lots, Design Review DRC2020-00139, for the construction of 17 single-family residences, and Minor Exception DRC2020-00141, for increased wall heights due to onsite grades. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The removal of the trees is necessary due to the condition of the trees related to disease, danger of collapse, proximity to an existing structure, or interference with utility services; and b. The removal of the trees is necessary in order to construct improvements which will allow economic enjoyment of the property. The seven heritage trees on the project site are in conflict with the proposed development of 17 single-family residences on the project site; and C. The removal of the trees will not negatively impact the neighborhood, the established character of the area, and property values. The removal of the trees will not negatively impact the neighborhood or the character of the area as there are a large number of mature trees surrounding the project site. Additionally, the applicant will plant 236 replacement trees including eucalyptus windrows along the north and south property lines; and d. The removal of the trees is necessary to construct required improvements within the public street right-of-way or within a flood control or utility right-of-way. The removal of the subject trees is necessary to construct public improvements; and e. The trees cannot be preserved through pruning and proper maintenance or relocation. A large number of the trees are in poor condition or need to be removed due to conflict PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-34 TRP DRC2020-00140 — MANNING HOMES May 26, 2021 Page 3 with the proposed improvements related to the construction of the proposed 17-lot subdivision; and f. The trees do not constitute a significant natural resource in the city. The trees slated for removal do not constitute a significant natural resource as the trees in the surrounding area are not dependent for their survival or are they significant because of their size, species, location or aesthetic qualities; and g. Removal of the trees is not restricted by a Specific Plan, Community Plan, or condition of approval. The eucalyptus trees along the north and south property line are required to be replaced per the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The landscape plan submitted for the project includes planting replacement eucalyptus windrows along the north and south property lines; and h. Every effort has been made to incorporate the trees into the design of the project and the only appropriate alternative is the removal of the tree. The trees slated for removal are in conflict with the construction of on-site improvements and cannot be incorporated into the project; and i. The removal of the trees will not have a negative impact on the health, safety, or viability of surrounding trees, nor will it negatively impact the aesthetics or general welfare of the surrounding area. The project site is in an area with a large number of mature trees. The impact on the surrounding area will be minimal with the planting of 236 replacement trees. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), the Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project was prepared by Applied Planning, Inc. and was peer-reviewed by The Altum Group, a consultant contracted by the City to review the report. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, it was determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. The mitigation measures that the applicant will be required to comply with will reduce potential project environmental impacts. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. No comments were received during the public comment period. A Mitigation Monitoring Program has also been prepared to ensure implementation of, and compliance with, the mitigation measures for the project. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i)that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-34 TRP DRC2020-00140 — MANNING HOMES May 26, 2021 Page 4 Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program, and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 774-4330. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF MAY 2021. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Tony Guglielmo, Chairman ATTEST: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary I, Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 26th day of May 2021, by the following vote-to- wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-34 TRIP DRC2020-00140 — MANNING HOMES May 26, 2021 Page 5 ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Conditions of Approval RANCHO CUCAMONGA Community Development Department Project#: SUBTT20334 Project Name: EDR - East Ave. 17 Location: 6179 EAST AVE - 022519117-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. The step-through gates at each end of the trail should have a minimum of 36 inches between the wood bollards for easier equestrian access. 2. The proposed equestrian trail cannot be blocked permanently for any purpose. Standard Conditions of Approval 3. The applicant shall sign the Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval provided by the Planning Department. The signed Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval shall be returned to the Planning Department prior to the submittal of grading/construction plans for plan check, request for a business license, and/or commencement of the approved activity. 4. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 5. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval or Approval Letter, Conditions of Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 6. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption and Mitigated Negative Declaration fee in the amount of $2,530.25. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing. 7. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. Exhibit E www.CityofRC.us Printed:5/13/2021 Project#: SUBTT20334 Project Name: EDR - East Ave. 17 Location: 6179 EAST AVE - 022519117-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 8. If the project developer chooses to pay the in-lieu fee, the in-lieu art fee will be invoiced on the building permit by the City and shall be paid by the applicant prior to building permit issuance. If the project developer chooses to install art, they shall submit, during the plan check process, an application for the art work that will be installed on the project site that contains information applicable to the art work in addition to any other information as may be required by the City to adequately evaluate the proposed the art work in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 17.124. If the project developer chooses to donate art, applications for art work donated to the City shall be subject to review by the Public Art Committee which shall make a recommendation whether the proposed donation is consistent with Chapter 17.124 and final acceptance by the City Council. No final approval, such as a final inspection or the a issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, for any development project (or if a multi-phased project, the final phase of a development project) that is subject to this requirement shall occur unless the public art requirement has been fulfilled to the satisfaction of the Planning Department. 9. This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the Engineering Services Department within 3 years from the date of the approval. 10. Access gates to the rear yards shall be constructed from a material more durable than wood gates. Acceptable materials include, but are not limited to, wrought iron and PVC. 11. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 12. Construct block walls between homes (i.e., along interior side and rear property lines), rather than wood fencing for permanence, durability, and design consistency. 13. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination and in conformance with Building and Safety Services Department standards, the Municipal Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department (RCFD) Standards. 14. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Services Department and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer. The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning Department a list of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes. 15. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all lots for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department approval; including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing. www.CityofRC.us Printed:5/13/2021 Page 2 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20334 Project Name: EDR - East Ave. 17 Location: 6179 EAST AVE - 022519117-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 16. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, the Development Code regulations, and the Etiwanda Specific Plan. 17. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 18. A uniform hardscape and street furniture design including seating benches, trash receptacles, free-standing potted plants, bike racks, light bollards, etc., shall be utilized and be compatible with the architectural style. Detailed designs shall be submitted for Planning Department review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 19. On corner side yards, provide minimum 5-foot setback between walls/fences and sidewalk. The 5-foot wall/fence setback and the parkway shall have landscape and irrigation in addition to the required street trees. Detailed landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. The parkway landscaping including trees, shrubs, ground covers and irrigation shall be maintained by the property owner. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the parkway maintenance requirement, in a standard format as determined by the Planning Director, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 20. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 21. Local Feeder Trail entrances shall also provide access for service vehicles, such as veterinarians or hay deliveries, including a 12-foot minimum drive approach. Entrance shall be gated provided that equestrian access is maintained through step-throughs in accordance with Engineering Services Department Standard Drawing 1006-B and 1007-B. 22. Local Feeder Trail grades shall not exceed 0.5 percent at the downstream end of a trail for a distance of 25 feet behind the public right-of-way line to prohibit trail debris from reaching the street. Drainage devices may be required by the Building and Safety Official. 23. Where corner side, interior side or rear yard property lines are adjacent to local equestrian trails, construct minimum 6-foot high decorative masonry walls. Decorative masonry shall mean split-face double sided block, 'slump stone' or an alternative material that is acceptable to the Design Review Committee. 24. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. www.CityofRC.us Printed:5/13/2021 Page 3 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20334 Project Name: EDR - East Ave. 17 Location: 6179 EAST AVE - 022519117-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 25. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double wall condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owners at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/fences along the project perimeter. 26. Street names shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval in accordance with the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map 27. A detailed plan indicating trail widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing, and weed control, in accordance with City Master Trail drawings, shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to approval and recordation of the Final Tract Map and prior to approval of street improvement and grading plans. Developer shall upgrade and construct all trails, including fencing and drainage devices, in conjunction with street improvements. 28. For single-family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer. Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Department to determine that they are in satisfactory condition. 29. Front yard and corner side yard landscaping and irrigation shall be required per the Development Code and/or This requirement shall be in addition to the required street trees and slope planting. 30. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits for the development or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. For development occurring in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, the landscape plans will also be reviewed by Fire Construction Services. 31. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 32. All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than 2:1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 33. All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. www.CityofRC.us Printed:5/13/2021 Page 4 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20334 Project Name: EDR - East Ave. 17 Location: 6179 EAST AVE - 022519117-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 34. Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. These criteria shall encourage the natural growth characteristics of the selected tree species. 35. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of building. 36. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Services Department. 37. New windrow planting of Eucalyptus Maculata (Spotted Gum) is required. The size, spacing, staking, and irrigation of these trees shall be in conformance with the City's Development Code Chapter 17.80. 38. All dwellings shall have the front, side and rear elevations upgraded with architectural treatment, detailing and increased delineation of surface treatment subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. (DIF Fees) Development impact fees are due prior to issuance of a building permit or certificate of occupancy per the Engineering Fee schedule, Government Code Section 66000, et seq. and local ordinance. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d), the 90-day approval period in which the applicant may protest these fees will begin at the date the fees are invoiced. Protests must be made in writing and be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the close of business on the 90th day of the 90-day approval period. *Note that fees are subject to change annually. 2. Street Lights: The street lights along East Avenue shall be owned and maintained by the City. The street lights along the private street shall be owned and maintained by the private community. Developer shall be responsible to coordinate and pay all costs of street lights and to provide power to City owned street lights. www.CityofRC.us Printed:5/13/2021 Page 5 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20334 Project Name: EDR - East Ave. 17 Location: 6179 EAST AVE - 022519117-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 3. Rancho Fiber: - Place 14" conduit structure (Mainline) with high-density polyethylene (HDPE) at location in the public right of way or utility easement dedicated specifically to the Rancho Fiber project (on East Ave). This conduit system will be required to follow the joint trench distribution system within the project frontage where the conduit bank can be installed alongside the Telco and CATV conduits at the proper communication depth with 2 pullboxes installed on each end. - Place 1-2" conduit structure (Service) with high-density polyethylene (HDPE) directly from mainline along "A" Street to an 8" round plastic "flower pot" type telecom access box flush mounted to finish grade to serve as a drop access point to the city network directly at each individual residence. This drop conduit shall be dedicated for City fiber drop installation only. An Optical network demarcation enclosure/panel shall be mounted on the side of the home, garage or utility closet for the placement of a Fiber Optic Network Interface Device. Placement of a #6 solid ground wire placed from network demarcation enclosure to power ground or a power outlet is required. If no power ground exists a 5/8" x 8" copper clad ground rod is to be installed for ground wire to be connected. Standard Conditions of Approval 4. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or noted on the final map. 5. Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. 6. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. 7. Public storm drain easements shall be graded to convey overflows in the event of a blockage in a sump catch basin on the public street, and provisions made to pass through walls. 8. Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk. 9. ** CD Information Required Prior to Sign-Off for Building Permit Prior to the issuance of building permits, if valuation is greater or equal to $100,000, a Diversion Deposit and a related administrative fee shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 65% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Applicant must identify if they are self-hauling or utilizing Burrtec prior to issuance of a building permit. Proof of diversion must be submitted to the Environmental Engineering Division within 60 days following the completion of the construction and /or demolition project. Contact Marissa Ostos, Environmental Engineering, at (909) 774-4062 for more information. Instructions and forms are available at the City's website, www.cityofrc.us, under City Hall / Engineering / Environmental Programs/Construction & Demolition Diversion Program. www.CityofRC.us Printed:5/13/2021 Page 6 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20334 Project Name: EDR - East Ave. 17 Location: 6179 EAST AVE - 022519117-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 10. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to Building Permit issuance if no map is involved. 11. Add the following note to any private landscape plans that show street trees: "All improvements within the public right-of-way, including street trees, shall be installed per the public improvement plans." If there is a discrepancy between the public and private plans, the street improvement plans will govern. 12. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Street Name Curb & Gutter A.C. Pvmt Side-walk Drive Appr. Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Bike Trail Etc. Notes: (a) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. 13. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. www.CityofRC.us Printed:5/13/2021 Page 7 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20334 Project Name: EDR - East Ave. 17 Location: 6179 EAST AVE - 022519117-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 14. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, and street name signing shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. N/A e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all corners of intersections per latest ADA standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Manager prior to submittal for first plan check. www.CityofRC.us Printed:5/13/2021 Page 8 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20334 Project Name: EDR - East Ave. 17 Location: 6179 EAST AVE - 022519117-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 15. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Min. Grow Space Spacing Size Qty. Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1)All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 16. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. 17. Street improvement plans per City Standards for all private streets shall be provided for review and approval by the City Engineer. Prior to any work being performed on the private streets, fees shall be paid and construction permits shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. 18. All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. 19. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. 20. All required public landscaping and irrigation systems shall be continuously maintained by the developer until accepted by the City. www.CityofRC.us Printed:5/13/2021 Page 9 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20334 Project Name: EDR - East Ave. 17 Location: 6179 EAST AVE - 022519117-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 21. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts, and/or community facility district as determined by the finance department shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 22. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 23. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 24. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Gates installed across a residential emergency vehicle access road (fire lane) are required to be in accordance with Standard 5-3. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section. 2. The site/project is located in the designated Wildland-Urban Interface Fire Area. Please include this note on the plans. Construction materials and methods and automatic fire sprinkler systems are to be in compliance with Chapter 7A of the California Building Code, Section R337 of the California Residential Code, and Fire District Standard 49-1. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section. 3. The site/project is located in the designated Wildland-Urban Interface Fire Area. Please include this note on the plans. A site-specific or project-specific fire protection plan is required for this project. The fire protection plan is required to be in accordance with Fire District Standard 49-1. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section. Building and Safety Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions www.CityofRC.us Printed:5/13/2021 Page 10 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20334 Project Name: EDR - East Ave. 17 Location: 6179 EAST AVE - 022519117-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Building and Safety Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. When the Entitlement Review is approved submit complete construction drawings including T-24 Energy Calculations, Structural Calculations, and Soils Report to Building and Safety for plan review in accordance with the current edition of the California Building and Fire Codes including all local ordinances and standards. The new structures are required to be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers. This site is located in the fire area designated VHFHSZ, all structures must be constructed with ignition resistant or noncombustible materials in accordance with the approved Fire protection Plan and/or the most current edition of the California Building Code including all local ordinances and standards. Vegetation / Landscaping must be designed and installed in accordance to the guidelines from the RCFPD for sites located in the VHFHSZ fire area. Grading Section Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Prior to issuance of a wall permit, a copy of the Grading Special Conditions of Approval shall be included within the engineered wall plans and calculations. Standard Conditions of Approval 2. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code and/or the California Residential Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 3. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 4. A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 5. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Engineering Services Department prior to the issuance of building permits. 6. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit. 7. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. All dust control sign(s) shall be located outside of the public right of way. 8. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Engineering Services Department for review, the rough grading plan shall be a separate plan submittal and permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. www.CityofRC.us Printed:5/13/2021 Page 11 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20334 Project Name: EDR - East Ave. 17 Location: 6179 EAST AVE - 022519117-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 9. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on-site construction where possible, and shall provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 10. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the grading plan shall show that all manufactured slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way, permitted line, or the adjacent private property. All slope offsets shall meet the requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 11. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Engineering Services Department. 12. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout "Information for Grading Plans and Permit". 13. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over-excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 14. Prior to issuance of a wall permit, on engineered combination garden/retaining walls along the property boundary the structural calculations for the wall shall assume a level toe/heel at the adjacent off-site property (i.e. a manufactured slope is not present). This shall be shown in the typical sections of the grading and drainage plan. 15. Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, the permitted grading plan (or architectural site plan) set shall show in each of the typical sections and the plan view show how the separations between the building exterior and exterior ground surface meet the requirements of Sections CBC1804.3/CRC R401.3, CBC2304.11.2.2/CRC R317.1(2) and CBC2512.1.2/CRC R703.6.2.1 of the current adopted California Building Code/Residential Code. 16. Prior to approval of the project-specific storm water quality management plan, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer, or his designee, a precise grading plan showing the location and elevations of existing topographical features and showing the location and proposed elevations of proposed structures and drainage of the site. www.CityofRC.us Printed:5/13/2021 Page 12 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20334 Project Name: EDR - East Ave. 17 Location: 6179 EAST AVE - 022519117-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 17. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the grading and drainage plan shall show the following information in the equestrian trails: — Provide PVC fencing per city standards, provide a 4" thick decomposed granite (DG) surface, provide a drainage V ditch parallel to the trail, provide a bridge over the V ditch where necessary for access to corals, and gates to corrals. The equestrian bridges shall be capable of carrying vehicle loads where necessary. Where the longitudinal slope (s) is S< 5% the cross fall shall be 2%, if S>5% the cross fall may be 4% maximum. Where water bars required, the spacing for the water bars is: 50' maximum for longitudinal slopes of 4% to 6%, 40' maximum for longitudinal slopes of 6.1% to 9%, 30' maximum for longitudinal slopes of 9.1% to 12%, 20' maximum for longitudinal slopes greater than 12%. In the equestrian trails water bars shall also be placed at the top and bottom of the trail where the gradient of the trail changes, i.e. a steep downhill slope which will cause additional erosion to the trail. 18. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Engineering Services Department for review and approval for on-site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. The plan and report shall contain water surface profile gradient calculations for all storm drain pipes 12-inches and larger in diameter. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. In addition, the project specific drainage study shall provide inlet calculations showing the proper sizing of the water quality management plan storm water flows into the proposed structural storm water treatment devices. 19. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the latest adopted California Plumbing Code. Private storm drain improvements shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan. 20. Prior to approval of the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), the WQMP shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 21. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Engineering Services Department and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 22. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID). The WDID number shall also be shown on the WQMP Site and Drainage Plan document. 23. The applicant shall provide a copy of a completed EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) for each underground infiltration device, with the Facility ID Number assigned, to the Engineering Services Department Official prior to issuance of the Grading Permit and/or approval of the project-specific Water Quality Management Plan. A copy of EPA Form 7520-16 shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set, and a copy of said form shall be included in the project-specific Water Quality Management Plan. www.CityofRC.us Printed:5/13/2021 Page 13 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20334 Project Name: EDR - East Ave. 17 Location: 6179 EAST AVE - 022519117-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 24. The land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis for the Class V Injection Wells/underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best management practices (BMP"s) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 25. The applicant shall prepare or amend existing CC&R's as needed to clarify how maintenance responsibilities will be shared between the newly created parcels and the remaining existing parcels of Tract No. 20334 prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading and drainage plan and the CC&Rs shall address shared access to private street, private storm drains, storm water treatment devices, surface drainage and maintenance of common areas, including landscaping within public rights-of-way and Best Management Practices identified in the WQMP. 26. The HOA shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the structural storm water treatment devices, commonly referred to as BMPs, to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The HOA shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the HOA. 27. The HOA shall follow the inspection and maintenance requirements of the approved project specific Water Quality Management Plan and shall provide a copy of the inspection reports on a biennial basis to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. 28. A final project-specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be approved by the Engineering Director, or his designee, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit or any building permit. 29. Prior to the issuance of a building permit or Engineering Services Department issued right of way permit, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer, or designee, a final project specific water quality management plan for review and approval, and shall have said document recorded with the San Bernardino County Recorder's Office. 30. Prior to the start of landscaping operations, the landscape architect and the landscape contractor shall provide a sample of the weed fabric barrier to the Project Planner, City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The weed barrier shall be permeable. www.CityofRC.us Printed:5/13/2021 Page 14 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20334 Project Name: EDR - East Ave. 17 Location: 6179 EAST AVE - 022519117-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 31. The final project-specific water quality management plan (WQMP) shall include executed maintenance agreements along with the maintenance guidelines for all proprietary structural storm water treatment devices (BMP's). In the event the applicant cannot get the proprietary device maintenance agreements executed prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant is required to submit a letter to be included within the WQMP document, and scanned and pasted onto the Site and Drainage Plan which states that prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy with applicant shall enter into a contract for the maintenance of the proprietary storm water treatment device. If the proprietary storm water treatment device is part of a residential subdivision, prior to the sale of the residential lot, the developer shall include maintenance agreement(s) as part of the sale of the residential lot to the buyer. A copy of the maintenance agreements to be included in the sale of the property shall be included within the WQMP document. 32. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Project-Specific Water Quality Management Plan shall include a completed copy of "Worksheet H: Factor of Safety and Design Infiltration Worksheet" located in Appendix D "Section VII — Infiltration Rate Evaluation Protocol and Factor of Safety Recommendations, ..." of the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans. The infiltration study shall include the Soil Engineer's recommendations for Appendix D, Table VII.3: Suitability Assessment Related Considerations for Infiltration Facility Safety Factors". 33. Prior to approval of the final project-specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project-specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans". 34. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy by the Building Official, or his designee, the civil engineer of record shall file a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Post Construction Storm Water Treatment Devices As-Built Certificate with the Environmental Programs Coordinator, City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Services Department. 35. The subgrade for the permeable paver storm water treatment devices shall have a level subgrade. Prior to issuance of the grading permit and approval of the final project-specific water quality management plan (WQMP) the engineer of record shall provide a pad elevation for the permeable paver subgrade on the grading plan and shall provide a detail on the WQMP site and drainage plan showing the permeable paver subgrade as level. www.CityofRC.us Printed:5/13/2021 Page 15 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20334 Project Name: EDR - East Ave. 17 Location: 6179 EAST AVE - 022519117-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 36. GROUND WATER PROTECTION: Prior to approval of the final project specific water quality management plan (WQMP), the WQMP document shall meet the requirements of the State Water Resources Control Board Order No. R8-2010-0036 (NPDES No. CAS 618036), the San Bernardino County Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Separation (MS4) Permit reads: Section XI.D(Water Quality Management Plan Requirements).8(Groundwater Protection): Treatment Control BMPs utilizing infiltration [exclusive of incidental infiltration and BMPs not designed to primarily function as infiltration devices (such as grassy swales, detention basins, vegetated buffer strips, constructed wetlands, etc.)] must comply with the following minimum requirements to protect groundwater: a. Use of structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause or contribute to an exceedance of ground water quality objectives. b. Source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration should be evaluated prior to infiltration. c. Adequate pretreatment of runoff prior to infiltration shall be required in gas stations and large commercial parking lots. (NOTE: The State Water Quality Control Board defines a large commercial parking lot as `100,000 sq. ft. or more of commercial development to include parking lot (with 100 or more vehicle traffics), OR, by means of 5,000sgft or more of allowable space designated for parking purposes'). d. Unless adequate pre-treatment of runoff is provided prior to infiltration structural infiltration treatment BMPs must not be used for areas of industrial or light industrial activity{77), areas subject to high vehicular traffic (25,000 or more daily traffic); car washes; fleet storage areas; nurseries; or any other high threat to water quality land uses or activities. e. Class V injection wells or dry wells must not be placed in areas subject to vehicular{78} repair or maintenance activities{79}, such as an auto body repair shop, automotive repair shop, new and used car dealership, specialty repair shop (e.g., transmission and muffler repair shop) or any facility that does any vehicular repair work. f. Structural infiltration BMP treatment shall not be used at sites that are known to have soil and groundwater contamination. g. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall be located at least 100 feet horizontally from any water supply wells. h. The vertical distance from the bottom of any infiltration structural treatment BMP to the historic high groundwater mark shall be at least 10-feet. Where the groundwater basins do not support beneficial uses, this vertical distance criteria may be reduced, provided groundwater quality is maintained. i. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause a nuisance or pollution as defined in Water Code Section 13050. The final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan shall specifically address items (a,b,e,h,and i) above. www.CityofRC.us Printed:5/13/2021 Page 16 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20334 Project Name: EDR - East Ave. 17 Location: 6179 EAST AVE - 022519117-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 37. RESIDENTIAL MANDATORY MEASURES — CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE — Prior to the issuance of any building permit the applicant shall comply with Section 4.106.3 (Grading and Paving) of the current adopted California Green Building Standards Code: Construction plans shall indicate how the site grading or drainage system will manage all surface water flows to keep water from entering building. Examples of methods to manage surface water include, but are not limited to, the following: 1. Swales. 2. Water collection and disposal systems. 3. French drains. 4. Water retention gardens. 5. Other water measures which keep surface water away from buildings and aid in groundwater recharge. Exception: Additions and alterations not altering the drainage path. www.CityofRC.us Printed:5/13/2021 Page 17 of 17 Planning Department Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval for SUBTT20334 I, Craig Kozma, as applicant for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20334 and Design Review DRC2021- 00139, hereby state that I am in agreement with and accept the conditions of approval for the subject tentative tract map located at APNs: 0225-191-09 and -17 in Rancho Cucamonga, California, as adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on May 25, 2021 and as listed below and attached. Applicant Signature Date Conditions of Approval 1. The applicant shall sign the Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval provided by the Planning Department. The signed Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval shall be returned to the Planning Department prior to the submittal of grading/construction plans for plan check, request for a business license, and/or commencement of the approved activity. 2. All conditions of approval attached to Resolution of Approval No. 21-25 for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20334 and Design Review DRC2021-00139 shall apply. Exhibit F Olt, i I DATE: May 26, 2021 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Planning Director INITIATED BY: Mena Abdul-Ahad, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: LOCATED AT 10839 CARRIAGE DRIVE — MOLINAR DESIGN, INC - A request for a Hillside Design Review to consider the construction of a new 6,871 square foot two-story single-family residence with an attached 4-car garage on a 20,724 square foot lot within the Very Low (VL) Residential District within the Hillside Overlay District and Equestrian Overlay District. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, this project qualifies for a Class 3 Exemption. APN: 1074-531-09 Hillside Design Review (DRC2019-00973). (Continued from May 12, 2021 PC Meeting.) RECOMMENDATION: • Approve Hillside Design Review DRC2019-00973 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The applicant proposes the development of a 6,871 square foot two-story single-family residence with an attached 4-car garage. On May 12, 2021, the Planning Commission continued the item to May 26, 2021 to allow staff to research and address the concerns that were brought up by the residents in the vicinity of the project site. Based on the comments at the May 12, 2021 public hearing, staff is now returning to the Commission to consider the entitlement which the Commission did not take action on at the May 12' public hearing. BACKGROUND: For a full history of the subject development application, reference the staff report from May 12, 2021 public hearing which is included with this staff report as Exhibit D. PROJECT ANALYSIS: During the May 12, 2021 public hearing, residents on Carriage Drive raised concerns regarding the proposed project which are listed below. Staff's responses follow each concern: 1. Resident's expressed concerns that the project would need Homeowners Association (HOA) approval. Staff response: The applicant has provided staff with an approval letter from the HOA approving the proposed plans. Staff notes that this is being provided for informational purposes only as the City does not have any ordinance or policy stating that the applicant must submit a letter from the HOA approving the proposed project. 2. Resident's expressed concerns with the placement of the house and requested the house be set further south into the property. Staff response: The proposed residence can't be setback further south into the property because that will cause the project to not comply with the minimum 60-foot rear yard setback. 3. Resident's expressed concerns regarding building height with some residents stating that the building will obstruct views. Staff response: The proposed residence is located in the Hillside Overlay District. The Hillside Development Standard Section 17.122.020.D.1.e. requires that residences in the Hillside Overlay be designed to fit within a 30-foot high building envelope. The applicant has illustrated the building envelope on the proposed plans which demonstrates that the proposed residence is in compliance with this code section. The proposed residence will have a 30-foot building height. Lastly, staff notes that there is no view preservation ordinance which would prevent the proposed residence from being constructed as illustrated in the plan set. 4. Resident's expressed concern that the building size was out of character for the existing neighborhood. The proposed residence is 6,871 square feet in total (1st and 2nd floor). Staff response: The floor areas of the existing homes within the vicinity of the proposed development along Carriage Drive were researched and the square footage is listed below: Existing Residence Existing Total Built 10827 Carriage Dr 5,887 square feet 10853 Carriage Dr 5,795 square feet 10858 Carriage Dr 6,298 square feet 10826 Carriage Dr 6,058 square feet 10817 Carriage Dr 8,588 square feet 10884 Carriage Dr 10,251 square feet 10871 Carriage Dr 5,211 square feet The chart above illustrates the different sizes of the existing residences' ranging from 5,211 sf. to 10,251 square feet. The proposed residence is compatible with the existing sizes along Carriage Drive as the proposed residence will have a floor area with a total of 6,821 square feet. 5. Staff also notes that at the May 12, 2021 public hearing, a resident noted that there was a discrepancy in the plan set relative to a pool house which appeared to be located in the rear yard. This discrepancy has been addressed and the corrected plan set has been included with this report as Exhibit B. Staff notes that the project will not include the pool house. CEQA DETERMINATION: Planning Staff determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 3 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines under CEQA Section 15303 — New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures, which permits the construction of a single-family residence in a residential zone. Staff finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Director has reviewed staff's determination of exemption, and based on her own independent judgment, concurs with staffs determination of exemption. Page 2of3 CORRESPONDENCE: Staff received on email correspondence (Exhibit F)from residents at property 10827 Carriage Drive voicing their concerns of the proposed project. Staff's responses are itemized above. COUNCIL MISSION /VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: The project fulfills City Council Core Value#7 (Continuous Improvement) by improving the vacant lot with a new high quality single-family residential unit which meets city requirements and guidelines. EXHIBITS: Exhibit A—Aerial Photo Showing Project Location Exhibit B — Plans Exhibit C — Design Review Committee Comments (April 6, 2021) Exhibit D — Planning Commission (May 12, 2021) Staff Report Exhibit E — HOA Approval Exhibit F — Email Correspondence Exhibit G — Resolution 21-36 Exhibit H — Conditions of Approval Exhibit I —Statement of Agreement Page 3 of 3 1� w � i� it II 1 a ,r 4 n�A� ' � II i 1, I � Y �I. � •'1i V, L I S rl All / ! 1. it 7 � I i v I rn c PROPOSED STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING a� 0 U C N 10839 CARRIAGE DRIVE o RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA. 91737 0 0 cc OFF _ T L O L a) to O 0 7 O_ a) L f C { FM •. . r'• - - t - -far.. . 2r1 C kL M s. it ■o z 0 a) o NEE SOMEONE -� - - .0 xr+ •'�'�—,� --- - -u-. 0 Lib MOLIN Design Inc . k - I E r i c k E M o I i n a r Iv 1 132 S . Spence Street Los Angeles , CA 90023 c 3 2 3 . 4 0 2 . 3 5 2 4 o wwwk. mo �ilnardessi g lgn . com -0 # ,R % :. i Project Title: - . ,. _._ �__ Single Family Yr., a 12 Residence I a) 0 10839 Carriage Drive lll Rancho Cucamonga CA 91737 v CZ Owner: 0) Jaime Enrique Herrera Avila 3 PROJECT DATA PROJECT DIRECTORY VICINITY MAP - Job Address: 10839 Carriage Drive rn Owner: Jaime Enrique Herrera Avila Rancho Cucamonga CA 91734 10839 Carriage Drive Legal Description: LOT 52 OF TRACT MAP NO.12332-2,IN THE CITY OF Rancho Cucamonga CA 91737 Construction Drawings 0 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, Deer Canyon 0 'L STATE OF CALIFORNIA AS PER MAPRECORDED IN Date: 03-25-2019 w M.B.218,PAGES 63-71.OF MAPS,IN THE OFFICE OF THE Designer: Molinar Design Inc. COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. 1132 S. Spence Street Scale: AS NOTED ELEVATION=85.247 FEET(2005') Los Angeles, CA90023 Rev.No. Rev./Issue Date./Issue Y1 FD.CHIS SQUARE ON TOP OF CURB LOCATED AT SOUTH 323.402.3524 SIDE OF D/W 82 FT.SOUTH OF POWER POLE#1072464E ALONG Structural Engineer: Sarami Engineering Consulting Tackstemst 4 Spirit Landscaping REV #1 : m a N THE EAST SIDE OF HERMOSA AVENUE,SOUTH OF WILSON 1225 W. Huntington Dr. St#1 AVENUE Arcadia, CA 91007 Almond St 626.356.7521 E Contractors 0 APN: 1074-531-09-0000 BM#80 Civil Engineer: AJA ENGINEERING, INC. Gardner Medical o L Zoning: R CIVIL&STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING o Lot Area: 18,924.5 S.F. 7411 FLORENCE AVE. N a m DOWNEY, CA 90240 Hidden farm Rd x c Bulding SF: First floor 3,494.00 SF (562)760-6040 and(562)277-2318 Stamp: U o 1 e Second floor: 3,377.00 SF 8 Carriage Drive a> Total: 6,871.00 SF Soils Engineer: A.G.I Geotechical, Inc. carrari St � 16555 Sherman Way, Suite A o a Van Nuys, CA 91406 HGS Financial roup �a4ch Dr Deck SF: 162 SF 818.785.5244 California Patio SF: 182 SF Mechanical Hillside P SITE / Community Church � v Porch SF: 96 SF Plumbing Engineer: Perfect Design/Engineering Inc. y Thermasol Steambath Balconies: 46 SF 2416 W. Valley Blvd. Alhambra, CA 91803 w90 R'd9eo��y a Breezeway: 72 SF °''Rd 626.289.8808 f° Garage#1: 420 SF The Church of Wilderness DrQ Sheet Title: >_ Garage#2: 420 SF Jesus Christ of Latter— Cali. Patio Bathroom: 44 SF Hillside Rd Hillside Rd Hillside Rd Building Footprint 4,757 SF m �; Lot Coverage: 4,757/ 18,924= 0.25 25%25% MAX. Monaco P: IR rb 12 �� Deer Canyon Rear Yard Lot Coverage: 361 /7,212= 0.05 05% 30% MAX. Sprinkler System: All levels + garage v Apple Beechwood Dr Was a) Rancho De Philo Winery o pp Ln TITLE Parking: 4 cars Poplar St 2-Car Garage: 840 SF o g Wilson Ave Wilson Ave Wilson Ave SETBACK DETERMINATION = 0 Hermosa School wSHEET 0 Side Yard Setback: 10'-0" (West) 15'-0" (East) Front Yard Setback: 42'-0" Sheet No. Rear Yard Setback: 60'-0" 0 0 No. of Lots Used: 1 c A- 000I I o ui c� at Q C0 m O U C O 7 O L EXISTING o BUILDING `o I co a N27° p4017E — _ 2098.04TC M i 2097.37FL II I I a- - '-3" 19'-1 11 19'-9" 21'-0" 46'-3" o I I I I Ex. 22'-011 II I I BLOCK Wq�� 51-811 Ln c° --- 19 7• CDII II BATHROOM 62 P.L. II II 44.00 SQ. FT • � k 7L W � LLO II II o O II II _ N II II o O II II � II II El 00 2093 G — Z II II ti FD. LT. LS.4430 BREEZEWAY a / 72.00 SQ. FT a a ON PL-PROD. II II OOO a a a o 0 : � CALIFORNIA a a° NF a 2095.15TCa 4215 TRAIL 7.0' DRAINAGE N PATIO ONTYARD SET13AC 2094.49FL 182.0o SQ. FT 4EASEMENT EASEMENT 6) � O I I II 42 0 F a a a a a a DWY a o II II o a a II II F, 1 —1 a L) SPA °° a) II II JACUZZI 7'-9„ a M EX. VINYL FENCE a II II _ o II II E a a i 2093.91TC o 2093.25FL 1ST LO R - II I I 34 00 Q � a ° � a D 0 °, OT S FT. 6, 1.0 Q. a MOLINAR OPEN DECK O H= 6.0 Q �U CA O IA ATI =1 .00 Q.F . iI it r1 11 rh c ECIK=1 .00 ao BAL ON[ S= .00 Q. PORCH ayi E r i c k E M o l i n a r ti B EZEWA =7 0 FT 96.00 SO. FT a i CV C0 1 1 3 2 S . S p e n c e S t r e e t L- II II GARA #1 42 .O0S .FT O a a a ; M Los Angeles , CA 90023 c II II GA GE = 0.0 SQ a a a 3 2 3 4 0 2 3 5 2 4 Brick@molinardesign . com II II B H O =4 0 FT I www . molinardesign . com -0 I A Project Title:I I I T 5 T . 123 -2 a' a � .B. ais -71 p a '46-4" II II a I Single Family II II Residence II II I a a I ^�, a a o 10839 Carriage Drive EX. CONCRETE I I I I I Rancho Cucamonga CA 91737 2 cf) CHANNEL DRAIN I a a a Owner: OPEN DECK 42'�FRONT Y a 2091.56TC 0 Jaime Enrique Herrera Avila N a YARD sErBAC 2090.89FL J II II GA x o V co • I I I I 420.00 S N a a a Construction Drawings o � II II _ I` II II I I �� REARYARDSET sA j G Date: 03-25-2019 wo xx Scale:AS NOTED Q O N o i > Rev.No. Rev./Issue Date./Issue REV #1: El 1:1 E: ILO _W I TELX0 80'-2 N ' ' ' ' ' O 190'-6" SLP - L ti o i ----- 30.00' W N II II 1 . 131 P .L. � FD. LT. LS.4430 Stamp: ON PL-PROD. U II II -->___�__-- EX. BLOCK WALL ]momm L o z I I I I N 15°5311 7"W O II II o Q O 2088.96TC 2022.28FL Sheet Title: W J EXISTING I M W I BUILDING M FFEXISTING W BUILDING 0 DC FD. CHIS. SQUARE ON TOP OF CURB LOCATED AT SOUTH SIDE � SITE PLAN OF D/W 82 FT. SOUTH OF POWER POLE #1072464E ALONG THE O U EAST SIDE OF HERMOSA AVENUE, SOUTH OF WILSON AVENUE. Sheet No. 2090.13TC FD. SPK& TR.12332- 2089.46FL � J C A- 1 00 PROPOSED SITE PLAN2 SCALE 1/8" = 1 '-O" 2 Q CO m O U C O 7 O L 1= L O O Q co 2X RAFTER TAILS M L 2111.16 2ND FLR. F.C. W -UU Ll H U- J - -- -- -- o 5,8"SMOOTH TROWEL FINISH STUCCO OVER LATH 18"TYPICAL TYVEK-DUPONT EAVE OVERHANG 3 OVER 2 LAYERS GRADE'D'PAPER 0 O o 21 2ND FLR. F.F. m p G�j M _ 1ST FLR.F.C.-' Cn a°gip � - - - - - -- -- co4-7 m — o WEEP Q SCREED 2091.75 MAIN F.F. - - - - STONE VENEER 0 c 0 U C TRAVERTINE MOLINA 1b @ Ss ii qy rih II rih q. .2) y E r i c k E M o I i In a r 1 1 3 2 S . S p e n c e S t r e e t L o s A n g el e s , C A 9 0 0 2 3 c PROPOSED FRONT ELEVATION NORTH A 3 2 3 4 0 2 3 5 2 4 0 erick@moIinardesign . com w w W . m o l i In a r d e s i g n . c o m -0 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" Project Title: 0 Single Family L Residence _ — — --- --- --- — — — — — 10839 Carriage Drive ---- _- — — — — — — — Rancho Cucamonga CA 91737 _ --- - -- -- Owner: -- — — — Jaime Enrique Herrera Avila 0 CO — — — — Construction Drawings .o — U L — — — — — Date: 03-25-2019 0 AS NOTED — 2111.16 2ND FLR.F.C. 2111.16 2ND FLR. F.C. Scale: � -- -- -- - - - - - - -0 0U UU Lf U U ti U - - - - - - -- -- -- Rev.No. Rev./Issue Date./Issue REV #1: Co Co U 60 60 O U N W O b Stamp: ° C? 2102.50 2ND FLR. F.F. 2102.50 2ND FLR. F.F. m N - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - E % N ch 2101.25 1ST FLR. F.C. 2101.25 1ST FLR.F.C.M o -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - -- -- o �° M p 19 1 EAO/ CD Sheet Title: N o U C N O) 2091.75 MAIN F.F. 2091.75 MAIN F.F. ELEVATIONS 2091.20 GARAGE F.F. a� c? _- CV c _ — O .Q _ O Sheet No. O J C N U C O7 A- 300 0 PROPOSED SIDE ELEVATION ( EAST) co SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" a CO m O U C O 7 O L L 0 Y \ Q Q co 2111.16 2ND FLR. F.C. 3: ad c L O 0 L Q O 2102.50 2ND FLR. F.F. ih o 2101.25 1ST FLR.F.C.'' o N N4-7 N N O 0 CO----------/q c co A A Lll�A L Cn c m _T C O U O 2091.75 MAIN F.F. O U �U N 0- co (n L L C O U C 7 MOLINA I� V 1b pa -% ii qy nll 11 rih q, a) y E r i c k E M o I i In a r 1 1 3 2 S . S p e n c e S t r e e t L o s A n g el e s , C A 9 0 0 2 3 c 3 2 3 . 4 0 2 . 3 5 2 4 0 PROPOSED REAR ELEVATION (SOUTH ) Brick@oIiIna desig n com w w w . m o l i n a r d e s i g n . c o m -0 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" N Project Title: 0 Single Family L Residence 10839 Carriage Drive Rancho Cucamonga CA 91737 Owner: Jaime Enrique Herrera Avila C2 _ o CO Construction Drawings o Y � U Date: 03-25-2019 w 0 2111.16 2ND FLR. F.C. Scale:AS NOTED Rev.No. Rev./Issue Date./Issuea REV #1: A A - a) b? E po U C O L U N O C Stamp: ° 2102.50 2ND FLR. F.F. _ - - - - - - - ce)' E c� 2101.25 1ST FLR. F.C. -' N o —41 oio -- _ — co CT Sheet Title:71, r ELEVATIONS 2091.75 MAIN F.F. Q -_— � - fir_— - — - - c? c O O U (N) POOL Sheet No. O SIN co J C N U C O7 A- 301 0 PROPOSED SIDE ELEVATION (WEST) co SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" a C0 Co iv D c O U C 7 O L E (E)2x8 RIDGE BEAM `o 2x8 ROOF RAFTERS @ 16"O.C.TYP. c� (N) 12"TYPICAL T EAVE OVERHANG (N)FASCIA TO MATCH EXISTING L 2111.16 2ND FLR. F.C. °� - - -- - 0 2-2X4 TOP PLATES R-30 INSULATION 3 s 1/2"GYPSUM BOARD a) V g "ER LATH STUCCO (E)2x6 CLG.JST.@ 16"O.C. Q O OV WALLS&CEILINGS TYP. L 2x6 BLOKING OPEN c0 (N) BEDROOM #3 (N) WCL SPACE (N) LAUNDRY (N) WCL (N) BEDROOM #1 °0 0 ROOM > 2x6 STUDS @16"O.C. - FULL HEIGHT a� kd 2102.50 2ND FLR. F.F. R13 INSULATION U) 2101.25 1ST FLR. F.C.M 0 4-7 c m U) c m • T O (N) POWDER (N) HALL (N) COATS (N) ENTRY (N) DINING ROOM ROOM 0 5/8 PLYWOOD SUB-FLOOR U R19 INSULATION aa) WEEP SCREED Q- 2091.75 MAIN F.F. 2090.00 GREAT RM. F.F. b L) 0 U C 7 MOLINAR O 1b V ii it rh 11 rh q, a� .y E r i c k E M o I i n a r 1 1 3 2 S . S p e n c e S t r e e t L o s A n g el e s , C A 9 0 0 2 3 c 3 2 3 . 4 0 2 . 3 5 2 4 0 QQ erick@molinardesign . com PROPOSED CROSS SECTION www . molinardesign . com SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" — — — — — — — Project Title: 0 - -- - - - - - Single Family ---- ---- - - - - Residence (E)2x8 RIDGE BEAM _ 10839 Carriage Drive 2x8 ROOF RAFTERS @- — 2 12 Rancho Cucamonga CA 91737 -- 16"O.C.-TYP. _ — — — Owner: - _ Jaime Enrique Herrera Avila (N)12"TYPICAL 12 EAVE OVERHANG 4® _ Q (N)FASCIA TO MATCH EXISTING 2111.16 2ND FLR. F.C. c - - Construction Drawings o 2-2X4 TOP PLATES I I :�E U R-30 INSULATIONLU EX.s "STUCCO �� 1/2"GYPSUM BOARD Date: 03-25-2019 OVER LATH (E)2x6 CLG.JST.@ 16"O.C. WALLS&CEILINGS TYP. 0 Scale:AS NOTED 2x6 BLOKING OPEN OPEN OPEN Rev.No. Rev./Issue Date./Issu 0- TO BELOW TO BELOW TO BELOW REV #1: 2x6 STUDS @16"O.C. - FULL HEIGHT o c� o a) E 2102.50 2ND FLR. F.F. R13 INSULATION 2101.25 1ST FLR. F.C.M a m c (N) GREAT ROOM Stamp: E U O (N) HALL - (N) FOYER (N) PORCH co CT 5/8 PLYWOOD SUB-FLOOR— (N) DECK R19INSULATION 0 WEEP SCREED Sheet Title: 2091.75 MAIN F.F. � T RM. F.F.,��\ /\ /\ /\ \/\ \ /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\//\//\//\//\//\//\ \�\ \ \�\ \�\ \ \f\/\/\/\/\/\/ / / // / // // // // // // /%//%\//%\//%\//%//%\//%//%\/\/ ///%\//%//%\//%\//%\//%\//%\//%\//%\//%\//%\//%\//%\//%\//%\//%\//%\//%\//%\//%\//%\//%\//%\//%\//%\//%\//%\//%\//%\//%\//%\//%\//% \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ //j 77777 /// \// \////////\///////////\////////� j/j/j/j/j/j/j/j/j 2091 0 ORCH F.F. \\//\\//\\ \\ \\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\// \ \\\\ \\\\\ \\\\\\\\j\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\l N POOL / / / / / /� /� /� /� / /� /� /� /� /� /� /� /� /� /� /� /� /� /� /� /� /� /� /� /� /� /� /� /� /�/ /i/ / // / // // // / /� /� /� /� /� /� /� /� /� /� /� /� /� /� O \ \ \i\r\r\i\i r\r \i \i\i\i\< \i\/\r\r /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/ \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\ \/\ \/\ \ \ \ \ \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\ \ \ \ \ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ POOL / i / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / \i / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / \ \ \ \ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \ \ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ /\/\/\ /\/\/\/\/\ \/ \/ /\% /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\ \/\/\/\/\ \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\ \NEW U N DE RP I N I N G/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/, \ \ \ \ 77 \ \77/ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \FOOTING TYP. /\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ /\/\/\ HOUSE / / / // 77 // // // // // // // // // // ! // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // / / // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // / / / // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // / // // // // // // //i.//,/ o \ \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\ /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/ /\ \ /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/ /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \ \\ \\4 \ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \ \ \\ \\ \ \\ \\\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ // // ///// // // // // // // // // // / // // // // // // // // / //x/////x//x//�//x//x//x �//x//x// Sheet No. J A-4 C N C 0 O7 ■ 0 PROPOSED LONGITUDINAL SECTION co SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" a 10839 Carriage Drive Rancho Cucamonga CA 91737 oe MOLINAR Material Board �vi Foam Stucco Corbels FauxWood MENOMONEE � ( Corinth Tumbled Travertine r Spanish OutdoorWall Light Coronado Stone Products Wrought Iron Guardrail Ledgestone Huron Faux at Balcony Stone Veneer Smooth Trowel Finish Stucco Spanish Style Wood Garage Door Polar Bear Behr Paint 790001 -641000 1'-4" 20'-2" 6" 4'-8" 6" 8'-1" 6" 10'-0" 6" 19'-9" 20'-6" 6" 9'-6" 6" s= 01 46'-3" 3'-0" L, 8" 12'-0" 7" 3'-0" 2'-3" L, 2'-0" 17'-3" 7'-6" 2'-6" 0 10 NJ A%, LF C N 7 O L_ — — 5 E o (N) PANTRY (N) BUTLERS PANTRY LO 24"MIN. - � 5 5 0 0 M � � T L ____ / 0 a) DW IFR ° CD 0 0 12 N N (N) CALIFORNIA PATIO to o o (N) KITCHEN MW Q CV n — N ®gog® (N) 2 CAR GARAGE 0') 0 0 ®®® r N 4 2 V) (N) ISLAND ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 0 (N) DINING ROOM V) ° L 0 0 0 N M L co M CY) c O O O CV U M g � U N O i O Ll N II MOLINAR D e s i g n I n c O a II N E r i c k E M o l i n a r °� 1 1 3 2 S . S p e n c e S t r e e t (N) D CK I Los Angeles , CA 90023 c 3 2 3 4 0 2 3 5 2 4 0 erick@molinardesign . com ' (N) FOYER www . molinardesign . com L °O - (N) GREAT ROOM I I - - 0O °' 00 0 2091.75 2" (N) PORCH CC 0 , C) U') 3 (N) HALL I 1 DN N M Project Title: o N N N Single Family L Residence up O = 10839 Carriage Drive Rancho Cucamonga CA 91737 M M Owner: �, Jaime Enrique Herrera Avila 3 II _ (N) FIRE PLACE O �' ° Construction Drawings o co U L Date: 03-25-2019 w O o Scale:AS NOTED N Q 6 6 Rev.No. Rev./Issue Date./Issue LJ REV #1 : 0 0 (N) GUEST SUITE o 2 LIVING ROOM 7 (N) MUD �' E \ / o N (N) HALL All Stamp: (N) DEC 6 30"MIN. E L) U O CO c6 C° 04 (N) POWDER Z (N) LAUNDRY (N) 2 CAR GARAGE O o 0 0 ROOM ROOM E co r' N N O 5 41 10Z3 (N) WCL (N) STORAGE Sheet Title: �' O o 0 2 (N) GUEST SUITE O O BEDROOM z 9 10 ILFIRST FLOOR 3 T � (N) BATH ROOM Co PLAN 0 ° L ° N F F � - U Q N 1'-8" 2'-0" o o Sheet No. 4 0 NEW FIRST 1'-4" 6'-5" 27'-3" 7" 3'-0" 2'-9" 2'-6" 8'-6" 5'-0" 11'-0" 5'-0" 5'-0" N N ° J C C6 FLOOR PLAN 1'-4" 6'-5" 14'-3" 6" 01 11'-6" 6" 4'-3" T-9" T-3" 2'-6" 6" 1 U-0" 6" 20'-0" 6" 1 ,0 LM SCALE: 1/4" = V-0" = N 1'-4" 6'-5" 27'-3" 16'-3" 34'-6" Y� —2 ■ 0 0 WALL LEGEND p 2X4 STUD WALL 85'-9" 2 Q 75'-011 o co s= 01 a 19'-0" 27'-3" 20'-9" 7'-0" 1'-0" 0 U C 6" 18'-6" 6" 26'-3" 6" 20'-3" 6" 740 '-0" 1'-0" 2'-0" ° 19'-0" 2'-10" J# 4'-0" 12'-8" 4'-0" T-9" 6'-11" 6'-0" 7'-10" 5'-0" 1'-0" E `o O P co _ _ T Q O O L Q (N) MASTER BEDROOM J a) o O o 04 (N) DECK (N) BEDROOM #1 0 a� = m o 14 00 M M 0 6 d 4-7 co z 6 C (N) WCL 6 Nco N O M O O U 3 "M I - 6 ° O U z T (N) WCL 8 U) = 9 (N) LAUNDRY 00 ROOM .5 Cfl 0 0 M v qt / (N) LN o AV- 5:1 Eil MOLINARU 0 - @Ssiiqyrh IIrhq, M q LM r y E r i c k E M o I i n a r CU 1 1 3 2 S . S p e n c e S t r e e t -2 L o s A n g el e s , C A 9 0 0 2 3 c 3 2 3 . 4 0 2 . 3 5 2 4 0 _ erick@molinardesign . com O w w w . m o l i n a r d e s i g n . c o m -a o o o N M r*_ Project Title: 0 Single Family O L ° OPEN - Residence 00 o OPEN c� TO BELOW OPEN 0 0 0 N 10 TO BELOW 72 DN O TO BELOW ° N N 10839 Carriage Drive � Rancho Cucamonga CA 91737 cc O Owner: �, 0 Jaime Enrique Herrera Avila 0 co Oco Construction Drawings o L Y U M _ o Date: 03-25-2019 w _ O M Scale:AS NOTED 0 Rev.No. Rev./Issue Date./Issu ti 00 6 3 "M1 REV #1: L z _ CU 0 0 iv (N) WCL g E m 6 N o ZL O O °(N) BEDROOM #2 4_6M 6 5_8 6 8-1 Stamp: s= ° - E U T _ O O 8'-2" 6" o, Lo, 5'-8" 6" 8'-011 `° o 0 ri 0 E N (N) BEDROOM #3 q M — in o c 6 z Sheet Title: _ (N) WCL N J U O O O CO c0 in ui 30"MIN. ° SECOND FLOOR AV— z *,v 0 PLAN 0 0 U .Q NEW SECOND " " " ' " " .. Sheet No. 19-0 3-5 8-8 10-2 4-0 21 -9 5-0 3-0 O m FLOOR PLAN J 6" 18'-6" 6" V 2'-11" 6" 8'-2" 6" 5-8" 6" 8'-0" 6" 20'-3" 6" V 7'-0" 1'-0" o. SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-O" A-201 L, 19'-0" 3'-5" 8'-8" 35'-11" 8'-0" o WALL LEGEND rco 2X4 STUD WALL 75'-0" O a 2 ,v,a2o2o Vent catculabr-oft8glfa co co THE MAIN ELECTRICAL SERVICE PANEL SHALL HAVE A RESERVED SPACE TO ALLOW FOR B INSTALLATION OF A DOUBLE POLE CIRCUIT BREAKER FOR A FUTURE SOLAR ELECTRIC INSTALLATION . THE RESERVED SPACE SHALL BE POSITIONED AT THE OPPOSITE (LOAD) END FROM THE INPUT FEEDER LOCATION OR MAIN CIRCUIT ' O'Hagin Vent Calculator LOCATION AND SHALL BE PERMANENTLY MARKED AS "FOR FUTURE SOLAR ELECTRIC" 4 :12 PITCH ROOF (TYP) 0 Step 1: DETERMINE SQUARE FEET OF CODE-REQUIRED VENTILATION )) ) Square Feet:4770 - Compliance Method: 150 `o = Total Square Feet of Code Required Ventilation > > > > > > > > > > 4 :12 PITCH ROOF (TYP ) : > c>3 Ste 2: CONVERT SQ. FT. OF CODE-REQUIRED VENTILATION TO SQ. IN )) ) )) )) )) )) )) y o x 144=4580 Total Square inches of Code Required Ventilation Ste 3: DETERMINE QUANTITY OF O HAGIN VENTS REQUIRED - �Q } > p >y >y >y >y >y >y >y >y >y >y >y >y >y >y >y >y >y >y >y Q. � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � >; >; >; >; >; >; >; >; >; >; >; >,�> J I 0 Y G Total Vents Required for sq. inches: Tapered Low-Profile High-Profile Model S 72.0 sq. in N FVA 97.5 sq. in N FVA )) )) o )) ) )) )) ��O I JQ' )) )) )) )) )) )) �, �, �, �, �, �, �, )) ) )) )) )) I o`� �, �, �, �, �, �, httpsl/ohagin.conVventcalwlator! 112 O N D� v, o tico �� Cn /4tt : 12" PITCH ROOF 0 HIP ROOF >) >) >) >) >) >) >) >) >) >) >) >) �, �, �, �, BORAL SPANISH TILE >) >) >) >) >) >) >) >) >) >) >) >) �, �, �, �, �, �, �, �, �, �, �, �, CLAYLITE )) )) )) )) )) )) (N) OWENS CORNING: MINERAL SURFACED ROLL o ICC ESR - 1017 )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) CLASS 'A' GAF #75 BASE SHEET )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) ROLLED /TORCH-DOWN �\ �\ �\ �\ �\ �\ �\ �\ �\ �\ 0 MOLIN R A )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) �� A 1b @ % II qy all II ih q. ',- c LM E r i c k E M o I i n a r )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) %4 : 12 PITCH ROOF �� I �XQ - 1 1 3 2 s . Spence Street TOO 0 Los Angeles , CA 90023 c_ O 3 2 3 . 4 0 2 3 5 2 4 0 . g Brick@molinardesign . com `CC www . moIinardesign . corn -0 )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) Project Title: o �o Single Family Residence )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) ) y, US Tile® by BOf al® • )> )> )> )) )) )) )) >) )) �T� )) )) ) �� ,,� ( 10839 Carriage Drive Build somethin reat� O Rancho Cucamonga CA 91737 2 9 g )> )> )> )) )) )) ��Q �� )) )) )) ) Q� Owner: )) )) )) )) )) O� �� )) )) )) )) ) -� Jaime Enrique Herrera Avila PRODUCT INFORMATION CO )) )) )) )) \\I )) )) )) )) )) )) )) ) %4" : 12" PITCH ROOF �, �, �, �, �, �, �, �, �, )> )> )> )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) ) Construction Drawings o Profile: ClaylliteO U Color Name: Merlot )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) ) Date: 03-25-2019 w SKU Number: 2lJNDlJ6072 Scale:AS NOTED Product Type: Lightweight Rev.No. Rev./Issue Date./Issu REV #1: Color: Red, Grey MUItICOIOr )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) �� ,i >,i >,i >,i >,i >,i >,i >,i >,i >,i >,i >,i >,i >,i >,i >,i >,i >,i >,i >,i >,i >,i >,i >,i >,i >,i >,i >,i >,i >�i Available Regions: a Nationwide C) )> )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) _ L LO Stamp: Tile Specifications I 00 C C Cool Rated Product E Size: 18 x 13 O Reflectivity: 0.22 Coverage:e: 88 O > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -0 g Aged Ref. (3 yr): 0.23 to Approx. Installed Weight: 590 Ibs > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > CT Emmisivit 0.83 y Pieces per Pallet: 336 p Aged Em. (3 yr) 0.87 Squares per Pallet: 3.8 < E SRI: 18* Approx. Weight per Pallet: 2300 Ibs )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) Aged SRI (3 yr): 21 CRRC ID#: 0133a Sheet Title: Seller ID#: 0942 *Calculated Aged value 1.au° ao allRoo8com) )> )> )> )> )> �Q 4 :12 PITCH ROOF (TYP)�, The printed color shown here may vary from actual available tile color and should not be used to color match. Please contact your local Sales Representative for actual the samples. �� > > y/ �OOF LA Initial Weathered )) )) )) )) O,C� �, �, , , , , , , � � � � Solar Reflectance 0.22 0.23 Thermal Emittance 0.83 0.87 )) )) )) 4 :12 PITCH ROOF (TYP) )) )) _ , �,_, �,_, �, �, �, _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Sheet No. R Rated Product ID Number 0133a )) �°i�°i�° �° �� >1 COOL ROOF Licensed Seller ID Number 0942 �� i 4 :12 PITCH ROOF (TYP) co ILI /q, RATING COUNCII, Clxssilication Production Line B v; Cool Roof Rating Council nitino art dotermined ror a fixed set of conditions.and may not he appropriate for delennming senwnml energy l,erl'ornuoive.The nclunl effect of w,htr trlltctance and Ihernaal emittnnce — � on budding performance may vary. A2 0 3 0 Manufacturer of protbtct stipulates that these rmings were dwermined in accordance with the applicable NEW ROOF PLAN Cool Roof Rating Council pr wOures. SCALE: 1/4" = V-0" a LEGEND — EXISTING STRUCTURE ITY OF RANCH CUCAMONGA EXISTING WALL AS NOTED o EXISTING CHAIN LINK FENCE TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY MAP zoo EXISTING WOOD/IRON FENCE AS NOTED --------- FINISHED SURFACE LINE 10839 CARRIAGE DRIVE = CENTERLINE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. 917370 PROPERTY LINE —(98)— EXISTING CONTOUR ELEV. �98)— PROPOSED CONTOUR ELEV. EXISTING PSL PIPE SLOPE BUILDING TC TOP OF CURB — — I I I I - - oo'401,E FL FLOWLINE — � � � _ J / / l �2?099?8.094�Tj�C III II II — I ¢ / I 2097.37FL SCO SEWER CLEANOUT II II EX. BLOCK WALL A/C ASPHALT CONCRETE FF FINISH FLOOR II II _ Z_ I I II I UT UNKNOWN UTILITY III II I _ 1�' P.A. PLANTING AREA I II I FS FINISH SURFACE 4i � FG FINISH GRADE V II II %00FH FIRE HYDRANT LT. LS.4430 \ I II 1 II II 1 II I II ON PL—PROD. / HT. HEIGHT I I II I II 2095.15TC 15 TRAIL 7.0 DRAINAGE — —— GAS METER I II 12094.49FL M EASEMENT II II EASEMENT I II I x105.50 EXISTING ELEVATION I III II I DWY II I I 105.50 PROPOSED ELEVATION I III II I I II I II II I i II I EXISTING UTILITY AS NOTED � ff I EX. VINYL FENCE II II I EXISTING TREE i II II I II 12093.91TC 2093.25FL LOT 52 II I II II I I II I I II II I II I I No II I II II CPO TR. 12332-2 II I II II oo M.B. 218/63-71 . I II III II I I �� I II II v I I III II I �� I II II I I III II I II I EX. CONCRETE CHANNEL DRAIN I I I I J�III IIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIII IIIII\III I I �0, II lIIII II Il i IIII 11IIII I I 2091.56TC 2090.89FL o 90o0 I I I II I III I I I �o� S P I I ILFD. — -- \ II II � 000, I III II I o0 I I II T. LS.4430 191.13' ® I II ION PL—PROD. EX. BLOCK WALL I I - - II II � I II I 2088.96TC I I II i I2022.28FL CITY BENCHMARK EXISTING BUILDING II I II I GRAPHIC SCALE EXISTING I I I II I BUILDING io zo ao BM NUMBER #80 I I DV II io o s I FD. CHIS. SQUARE ON TOP OF CURB LOCATED AT SOUTH SIDE li II II I II I I ( IN FEET ) OF D/W 82 FT. SOUTH OF POWER POLE #1072464E ALONG THE II 1 inch = 10 ft. EAST SIDE OF HERMOSA AVENUE, SOUTH OF WILSON AVENUE. I� I 1I 12089.46FL FD. SPK&W. FLUSH, FITS PER TR.1 ELEVATION = 85.247 FEET (2005 ) 332-2 M.B. 218 LEGAL DESCRIPTION PREPARED BY: TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY MAP JOB NO: A J A ADS: 018-095 LOT 52 OF TRACT MAP NO. 12332-29 IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY ADDRESS: 10839 CARRIAGE DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. 91737 DATE: 04/17/18 OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA AS PER MAP RECORDED IN M.B. 2189 P.O. BOX 1 633 APN: 1074-531 -09-0000 SHEET 1 of 1 PAGES 63-71 . OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. DOWNEY, CA 90240 APN: 1074-531 -09-0000 (562) 760-6040 TEL ENGINEER SCALE: 1 "= 10' DRAWN BY: D.P. CHECKED BY: A.A. EMAIL. cdseng@yahoo.com ALEJANDRO J. ALATORRE DATE R.C.E. 32761 , EXP. 6/30/18 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA rp cn aTo r � zip C2 C7 � � � � -4IT1 m CO) — m o M o r L r z T cn a -0 a _ _ � -u � � D cn -q -1 � rt� i rn C� Z N y, y = C I I m I I m 0 can D o r �. *4 40 o T000 � a oa o o 00 � z � � � � r Z oTom m �� o � o m I I I Ci7 .L Z II T � (7) N m m -U rm 0 = m m TI -0 c m D cn -Ti � � u m u C TI m m m m W v C Z N CA x x x D m z z r z z cn m r O X m z x x x x a a . . . . �n �n o �n _ _ _ Cm C7 rn W = y a C� �1 v --I = m F v> z z � m m � cn z z O z = o cn p m z � T p N N >O C R1 0 = T y CD Z c� c� N c� m z � z om m N z m z z z Z o o ?� 0 m m p m c z m c-) o m o :cm cm C7 o = Z �_ p D �7 O p -Tic O O D O r c O = D O r D D m c m p C� r,I w `< C7 cn CD Ma m -n y C W Cif m r m D m � D F � zo ao no z Z Op z 1 � y Z m a o o c Z D m � o m C D -1 — a CD a C DCIO 1 Oz m m r C Z M C O O z � m r zz � z m C O T N O N Z r T o m m m m -Ti T T W o C m C) m z z o W Z CD T = C p m m T C7 .� COP) D T IV cn - - _ C r r T CD Z = * n o p a T Z = O O - p a mT y MN _ ,00'LZl - - - - - M„55,LZ.lLN - - N— nco T N v c:, _ - cai» � � a W� - - - V � a, 00 x x X x CO)C -7 Z a C I Zo N m� m I a o = N o0 o � � m CD Z m Z � Z�' Ln C C) Z a) y M T = IH .4 T S0,110Z — - - - - - - — - - — - - - - — — — --tg g Z- = Cm = 90*CLOZ L�'Z8 _ _ o �"� T SO'�LO —_ —_ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 9 LOB - - - - - - - - - - -0 80Z a y - - — - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 8Z'6 x r No m a x N W Cm o N a v II m T W CA C* a a00 00 o N Z a ^' x � v CD o cn PO . . C CO Z = CO) CA Cl � V m o 0 i I o 11` W CA 0o z I x CA) v N N C:) O N 00 O N CO) CA I o�Q2 o m>< Q ' c x I W g C) o — zz C-) � O OD p in 00 CD x � W r- x O0 x C N O CO x r N IV r O 00 i W DD X DD CID D0 0 I r C) m < 0 > Z m r p o 0 co J = O m r I 00 U) MC ) O - - a 0 r =X 0 (00 z a O o� IM �: ul Cl CY) C 0 I D 0 -o N I WN N > I Cif o 90 r., I0 r z O y ■ ■ I a CoI CO) p x n 110 > O O C7 X C. � I 4 O D o O O 0-) WX I 0 0 ON W D c> x ' 0O m o (n / N x C 00 coco bo rnC I w N I � %M v m J I z - Ni M z � I W w*4 m x Ilim O cn w*4 C7 I j o 2 ■ m D obp z O CA 0 w N ZJ J p rn m D I X 0-) � CA _ _ - - — =8 9.3 0' z CD O _ — -- — _ R=460.00' — 9NIiSN3 " L 00 }1ldM3OIS _ _ — / CD N I V( O l 0 Z _ V � / �095.g4 EXISTING - o ® / o SIDEWALK -x` �20g765 oo O� _ - - - - - - - - - - - -�� 20 - - - - - - NN - - - - _ _ _-I - 95.6'8 c c0 c0 z D — N�V co CD TI SA SA C)CD N N I I cn cD m 000cco Nrn o 0o AN VI �cn O rn rnw w rc rn O .Z7N 00 v 90 N p w C)C) (D 0PO Ln r � 1�1 x_ L=83.48' I w — R=430.00' C A G E D D R _I V _ x li -0 E D N OIND xCD N c0 m � � m � 0 °° N o 0 D �7 C N II w z 000 : � O = � O o O� D = O c O 01 Z O m C N ` ♦ z O O ... O o C ... O 0 C) m m z n p o D u - c� C O c0 n o D CA r, m Z m o c- = D m m m0 D � O o a) 00 00 ZO D D � O O . . TJ \ c0 Ul A r^ 0 DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS April 6, 2021 7:00 p.m. Mena Abdul-Ahad, Assistant Planner HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2019-00973 — MOLINAR DESIGN, INC. - Site plan and architectural review of a 6,871 square foot two-story single-family residence with an attached 4- car garage on a 18,924 square foot lot within the Very Low (VL) Residential District within the Hillside Overlay District and Equestrian Overlay District at 10839 Carriage Drive - APN: 1074- 531-09. This item is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA guidelines under CEQA Section 15303 — New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures. Site Characteristics: The 18,924 square foot vacant project site is located on the north side of Carriage Drive. The property dimensions are approximately 89 feet along the north property line, 191 feet along the east property line, 127 feet along the south property line, and 197 along the west property line. The downslope lot has an elevation of approximately 220 feet as measured at the curb face along the north property line to the south property line, for a maximum grade change of approximately 9 feet from the north to south property lines. The site is covered in short grasses. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Very Low (VL) Residential Very Low (VL) District Site Vacant Land Residential Hillside Overlay District Equestrian Overlay Very Low (VL) Residential Single-Family Very Low (VL) District North Residence Residential Hillside Overlay District Equestrian Overlay Very Low (VL) Residential Single-Family Very Low (VL) District South Residence Residential Hillside Overlay District Equestrian Overlay Very Low (VL) Residential Single-Family Very Low (VL) District East Residence Residential Hillside Overlay District Equestrian Overlay Very Low (VL) Residential Single-Family Very Low (VL) District West Residence Residential Hillside Overlay District Equestrian Overlay Project Overview: The applicant is requesting to construct a 6,871 square foot two-story, single- family residence with an attached 840 square foot garage on the project site. The proposed grading includes up to 9 feet of fill which necessitates that the project be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission per Section 17.122.020.G.1.1. Exhibit C DRC COMMENTS HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRCDRC2019-00973- MOLINAR DESIGN, INC. April 6, 2021 Page 2 The proposed residence has a modern Mediterranean style design theme, which includes stone veneer, smooth trowel stucco finish, rafter tails, clay tile roofing, vinyl windows, and aluminum balcony railings. The residence was designed to be compliant with the Hillside Design Guidelines (Section 17.122.020.D.2), including minimizing view obstructions by overbuilding of the site. The building mass is broken up through the use of multiple wall plane changes and the incorporation of exterior decks along the north and south elevation. The proposed 6,874 square foot residence consists of a 3,494 square foot first floor, which includes the main living area, garage, and a guest suite, and a 3,377 square foot second floor which consists of four (4) bedrooms and a laundry room. The first and second floor include decks along the south elevation. The size of the 6,871 square foot residence is in keeping with homes constructed on Carriage Drive within the vicinity of the project site, which range in size from 2,000 square feet to 8,500 square feet. The project complies with the requirements of the Very Low (VL) Residential District as follows: Development Requirements Proposed Front Yard 42' +/- 5' 46'-4" Interior Side Yards 10' / 15' 10' / 15'-9" Rear Yard 60' 60' Lot Coverage 25% max 24% 35' (30' limit within the Hillside 30' Building Height Overlay) The project complies with the intent of the Hillside Overlay District, which seeks to facilitate appropriate development of hillside areas. The site is a downslope lot with an elevation change of approximately 9 feet from the north to the south property lines. The proposed grading design limits earthwork to 500 cubic yards of import, which is necessary to construct the foundation of the residence. The foundation of the residence is stepped with the existing grade, with the pad at an elevation of 2,092 feet, in conformance with Hillside Design Section 17.122.020.D.1.a., to terrace the building to follow the slope. Hillside Design Section 17.122.020.D.1.C. requires that residences in the Hillside Overlay District be designed to fit within a 30-foot high building envelope. The applicant has provided north-south and east-west elevations with building envelopes demonstrating compliance with the 30-foot height requirement. The maximum permitted retaining wall height is 4 feet within the Hillside Overlay District, with stepped retaining walls permitted to have a maximum height of 3 feet with a minimum 3 foot separation between the stepped walls. The applicant is not proposing any retaining walls. If this changes during construction, the applicant is responsible to submit plans to the Planning Department showing that no retaining walls are proposed in excess of 4 feet and a minimum 3- foot separation is between the stepped retaining wall. The project site has existing 6-foot-high perimeter walls along the east, south and west property lines. The existing perimeter walls are DRC COMMENTS HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRCDRC2019-00973- MOLINAR DESIGN, INC. April 6, 2021 Page 3 in keeping with Hillside Design Guideline Sections 17.122.020.E., which requires that the design of walls that integrate the materials and colors used of the residence. The proposed landscaping will be required to comply with Hillside Development Section 17.122.020.F., including the use of drought-tolerant landscaping to protect slopes from erosion and planting shrubs to soften the views of the downslope elevations. The project is within the High Fire Hazard Zone and within a wildland-urban interface area. A landscape plan has not provided at this time. As a Condition of Approval, this plan will be required when grading and construction plans for the project are submitted to the City for plan check. Staff Comments The project conforms with the Development Code and the Hillside Design Standards and Guidelines and provides a grading design that balances the requirement to reduce cut and fill to the greatest extent possible and to reduce the height of the structure to limit view obstructions as seen from the residences to the north. The residence is well-designed and carries the design theme to all elevations, including providing wall plane articulation. The residence is stepped with the existing grade which further reduces the overall bulk as seen from Carriage Drive. Earthwork is limited to 500 cubic yards of export and grading is limited to the area necessary to construct the residence and open deck area to the south of the residence. The proposed design does not require Variances or Minor Exceptions. Major/Secondary Issues: None Staff Recommendation: Staff requests that the Design Review Committee consider the design (building architecture, site planning, etc.) of the proposed project and recommend the selected action below to the Planning Commission: ORecommend approval of the design of the project as proposed by the applicant. ❑Recommend approval with modifications to the design of the project by incorporating revisions requested by the Committee. Follow-up review by the Committee is not required. The revisions shall be verified by staff prior to review and action by the Planning Director / Planning Commission. ❑Recommend conditional approval of the design of the project by incorporating revisions requested by the Committee. Follow-up review by the Committee is not required. The revisions shall be Conditions of Approval and verified by staff during plan check after review and action by the Planning Director/ Planning Commission. ❑Recommend denial of the design of the project as proposed by the applicant. Staff Planner: Mena Abdul-Ahad, Assistant Planner Members Present: Staff Coordinator: Mike Smith, Principal Planner CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: May 12, 2021 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Planning Director INITIATED BY: Mena Abdul-Ahad, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: LOCATED AT 10839 CARRIAGE DRIVE — MOLINAR DESIGN, INC - A request for a Hillside Design Review to consider the construction of a new 6,871 square foot two-story single-family residence with an attached 4-car garage on a 20,724 square foot lot within the Very Low (VL) Residential District within the Hillside Overlay District and Equestrian Overlay District - APN: 1074-531-09; DRC2019-00973. RECOMMENDATION: Approve Design Review DRC2019-00973 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: A request to develop a vacant 20,724 square foot lot with a 6,871 square foot two-story single-family residence with an attached 4-car garage. The modern Mediterranean design is generally compatible with the residential neighborhood in which it is located. The project is in compliance with the development standards for Very Low (VL) Residential District, Hillside Overlay and the Equestrian Overlay. Design Review Committee forwarded the project to Planning Commission without correction on April 6, 2021. Planning commission review is required because an excess of 5 feet of excavation/fill is proposed pursuant to Development Code Section 17.122.020.G.1.i. This item is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA guidelines under CEQA Section 15303 — New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures, which permits the construction of a single-family residence in a residential zone. BACKGROUND: The 20,724 square foot vacant project site is located on the north side of Carriage Drive within the Very Low (VL) Residential District, Hillside Overlay and Equestrian Overlay. The property dimensions are approximately 89 feet along the north property line, 191 feet along the east property line, 127 feet along the south property line, and 197 along the west property line. The downslope lot has an elevation of approximately 220 feet as measured at the curb face along the north property line to the south property line, for a maximum grade change of approximately 9 feet from the north to south property lines. The site is covered in short grasses. PROJECT ANALYSIS: The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning Designations for the project site and adjacent properties are Page 1 of 4 Exhibit D Olt, as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Vacant Land Very Low (VL) Very Low (VL) Residential District' 2 Residential Very Low (VL) Ver Low VL Residential District' 2 North Single-Family Residence Residential y ( ) South Single-Family Residence Very Low (VL) Very Low (VL) Residential District' 2 Residential East Single-Family Residence Very Low (VL) Very Low (VL) Residential District' 2 Residential Very Low (VL) VeryLow VL Residential District' 2 West Single-Family Residence Residential ( ) 1-Hillside Overlay District 2-Equestrian Overlay District A. Project Overview: The applicant is requesting to construct a 6,871 square foot two-story, single-family residence with an attached 840 square foot garage on the project site. The proposed grading includes up to 9 feet of fill which necessitates that the project be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission pursuant to Development Code Section 17.122.020.G.1.1. B. Architectural and Site Design: The proposed residence has a modern Mediterranean style design theme, which includes stone veneer, smooth trowel stucco finish, rafter tails, clay tile roofing, vinyl windows, and aluminum balcony railings. The residence was designed to be compliant with the Hillside Design Guidelines (Development Code Section 17.122.020.D.2). The building mass is broken up through the use of multiple wall plane changes and the incorporation of exterior decks along the north and south elevation. The proposed 6,871 square foot residence consists of a 3,494 square foot first floor, which includes the main living area, garage, and a guest suite, and a 3,377 square foot second floor which consists of four (4) bedrooms and a laundry room. The first and second floor include decks along the south elevation. The size of the 6,871 square foot residence is in keeping with homes constructed on Carriage Drive within the vicinity of the project site, which range in size from 2,000 square feet to 8,500 square feet. C. Very Low(VL) Residential District Compliance: The project complies with the following relevant development standards of the Very Low (VL) Residential District as follows: Development Requirements Proposed Front Yard 42' +/- 5' 464" Interior Side Yards 10' / 15, 10' / 15-9" Rear Yard 60' 60' Lot Coverage 25% max 24% Page 2 of 4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 01 SO_ Building Height 35' (30' limit within the Hillside Overlay) 30' D. Hillside Overlay District Compliance: The project complies with the intent of the Hillside Overlay District, which seeks to facilitate appropriate development of hillside areas. The site is a downslope lot with an elevation change of approximately 9 feet from the north to the south property lines. E. Building Envelope Analysis: Hillside Development Standard Section 17.122.020.D.1.e. requires that residences in the Hillside Overlay be designed to fit within a 30-foot high building envelope. The applicant has provided north-south and east-west elevations with building envelopes demonstrating compliance with the 30-foot height requirement. F. Grading: The proposed grading design limits earthwork to 500 cubic yards of import, which is necessary to construct the foundation of the residence. The foundation of the residence is stepped with the existing grade, with the pad at an elevation of 2,092 feet, in conformance with Hillside Design Section 17.122.020.D.1.a., to terrace the building to follow the slope. G. Retaining walls: The maximum permitted retaining wall height is 4 feet within the Hillside Overlay District, with stepped retaining walls permitted to have a maximum height of 3 feet with a minimum 3-foot separation between the stepped walls. The applicant is not proposing any retaining walls. If changes to the wall plan are found to be necessary during construction, the applicant is responsible to submit plans to the Planning Department showing that no retaining walls are proposed in excess of 4 feet and a minimum 3-foot separation is between the stepped retaining wall. H. Perimeter walls and Fencing: The project site has existing 6-foot-high perimeter walls along the east, south and west property lines. The existing perimeter walls are in keeping with Hillside Design Guideline Sections 17.122.020.E of the Development Code, which requires that the design of walls that integrate the materials and colors used of the residence. I. Landscape: The proposed front yard landscaping is designed to comply with Development Code Section 17.122.020.F., which requires new development to include the use of drought-tolerant landscaping to protect slopes from erosion and planting shrubs to soften the views of the downslope elevations. The proposed front landscaping complies with the front yard landscape requirements, including reducing hardscape to less than 50 percent of the front yard area, at least 25 percent landscape and no more than 25 percent decorative hardscape. The proposed front yard landscaping does not exceed the maximum applied water allowance (MAWA) which meets the criteria of State Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (MWELO) Section 17.82.020. All vegetation shall be designed and installed in accordance to the guidelines from the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (RCFPD) for sites located in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone (VHFHSZ) fire area and is in the designated Wildland-Urban Interface Fire Area. J. Design Review Committee: The project was reviewed by the Design Review Committee (Oaxaca and Williams) on February 16, 2021. Staff presented the project to members of the Design Review Committee and members of the Committee recommended approval as presented. The committee stated that the project was well designed and recommended that the project move forward to the Planning Commission for final review. Page 3 of 4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CEQA DETERMINATION: Planning Staff determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 3 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines under CEQA Section 15303 — New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures, which permits the construction of a single-family residence in a residential zone. Staff finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Director has reviewed staff's determination of exemption, and based on her own independent judgment, concurs with staff's determination of exemption. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing with a regular page legal advertisement in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin on (date) and notices were mailed to all property owners (include how many property owners were notified), within a 660-foot radius of the project site on April 28, 2021. To date, no comments/correspondence has been received in response to these notifications. COUNCIL MISSION /VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: The project fulfills City Council Core Value#7 (Continuous Improvement) by improving the vacant lot with a new high quality single-family residential unit which meets city requirements and guidelines. EXHIBITS: Exhibit A—Aerial Photo Showing Project Location Exhibit B — Plans Exhibit C — Design Review Committee Comments (April 6, 2021) Page 4 of 4 Rancho C camo nga V CEO F � rstSe rvice 130 Anaheim Pl ace � d � ntial , CA - North Ina lnd Empire Rancho Cucamon � Suite lip Ph : 909 - 9g1 . 4 � 3gar CA 9173000 Fax : 909 N% 981 M" 7631 Firstservice RESIDENTIAL January 17 , 2020 i tana Herrera Ba rajas 12548 Carmel Knolls Drive w, Ranch 0 Cucam011g CA 917319 USA RE : Architectural Modification Conditionally Approved 10839 Carriage Drive customer ID # : C U3320 - 0051 --* 02 Dear L*ili2ana Herrera Barajas We are pleased to inform y ou that yo ur plans were cC) nditionally approved on January 15 , 2020 by the Arch Committee ,, Please ensure that you comply with the conditions noted below : • Contingent upon Architect Pete Volbeda corrections ( please see the attached fetter) & City approlll��I��ilal . Thank you for your patience and cooperation . If you have any questions , please refe r to your Communt'Oty Polic ies or contact me at 909 -w981 -4131 or at abriel . Guerrero2@fsresidentiai . com . Thank you . Sincerely, Gabriel Guerrero Community Manager Exhibit E Abdul Ahad, Mena From: Alexander Garcia <asgarinc@outlook.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 4, 2021 4:03 PM To: Abdul Ahad, Mena Subject: Planning Commission Hearing regarding 10839 Carriage Dr Rancho Cucamonga Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed CAUTION:This email is from outside our Corporate network. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Mena Abdul-Ahad, We are residents of Rancho Cucamonga currently residing at 10827 Carriage Drive in Haven View Estates. We received a Notice of Public Hearing regarding the proposal of new construction at 10839 Carriage Dr. We have lived at 10827 Carriage Drive for 17 years, next to the vacant lot. We would like to express the following concerns for the requested Hillside Design Review of 10839 Carriage Dr • Concern that the proposed square footage of 6,871 plus 4 car garage is too large for the size of the lot and location • The proposed two-story design will potentially impede the view from our residence and neighboring residences causing concern for the proposed elevation of the residence. Carriage Drive declines in elevation therefore each house has been designed with an elevation lower than the next residence. This allows for each residence to maintain their views. This standard should be followed with this new construction. • Request neighbor review of proposed setbacks of the property, including location and height of the proposed residence, garage, and walls on the lot. If the residence is constructed too far back on the lot, it will impede our view from our master bedroom and backyard space. Thank you for presenting our concerns to the Planning Commission. Sincerely, Sherie and Alex Garcia 10827 Carriage Dr Alta Loma CA 91737 Exhibit F RESOLUTION NO. 21-36 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2019-00973-SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW OF A 6,871 SQUARE FOOT TWO-STORY SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE WITH AN ATTACHED 4-CAR GARAGE ON A 20,724 SQUARE FOOT LOT WITHIN THE VERY LOW (VL) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, HILLSIDE OVERLAY DISTRICT, AND EQUESTRIAN OVERLAY DISTRCIT AT 10839 CARRIAGE DRIVE;AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF—APN: 1074-531- 09. A. Recitals. 1. Molinar Design, Inc. filed an application for the approval of Hillside Design Review DRC2019-00973, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution,the subject Hillside Design Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 12th day of May 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. On the 26t"day of May 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on May 26, 2021, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The applicant is requesting to construct a 6,871 square foot two-story single-family residence with an attached 4-car garage on a 20,724 square foot lot within the Very Low (VL) Residential District, Hillside Overlay District, and Equestrian Overlay District at 10839 Carriage Drive; and b. The site is bordered by single-family residences to the north, south, east, and west. The surrounding properties are all within the Very Low (VL) Residential District, Hillside Overlay District, and Equestrian Overlay District; and C. The project complies with the requirements of the Very Low(VL) Residential District, Hillside Overlay District and Equestrian Overlay District, including providing a grading design that balances the requirement to reduce cut and fill to the greatest extent possible; and Exhibit G PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-36 HDR DRC2019-00973— MOLINAR DESIGN, INC. MAY 26, 2021 Page 2 d. The design limits earthwork to 500 cubic yards of import,which is necessary to allow the construction of the foundation of the residence. The foundation of the residence is stepped with the existing grade, with the pad at an elevation of 2,092 feet, in conformance with the Hillside Overlay Design Section 17.122.020.D.1.a to terrace the building to follow the slope.The proposed design does not require Variances or Minor Exceptions, and the square footage is compatible with the other residences along Carriage Drive; and e. The residence is in compliance with Hillside Design Section 17.122.020.D.1.e.,which requires that residences in the Hillside Overlay District be designed to fit within a 30-foot high building envelope. The applicant has provided north-south and east-west cross-sections with building envelopes demonstrating compliance with the 30-foot height requirement; and f. Retaining walls are limited to 4 feet in height or less, in keeping with Hillside Development Section 17.122.020.G.1.j. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan.The General Plan Land Use designation of the project site is Very Low (VL) Residential District. The Very Low (VL) Residential designation is intended for the development of detached, low-density residences on individual lots.The General Plan also provides a goal of facilitating sustainable and attractive infill development that complements surrounding neighborhoods. The project is for the development of a single-family residence on an existing residential lot that is complementary to the surrounding neighborhood. b. The proposed use is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. Section 17.36.010 of the Development Code states that the Very Low(VL)Residential District is for the development of single-family residential uses with a minimum lot size of 20,000 square feet and a maximum residential density of 2 units per gross acre. The project site is an existing 20,724 square foot vacant lot that was intended for the development of a single-family residence. C. The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code, including building setback, building height, lot coverage, grading limitations and design. The project complies with the requirements of the Very Low (VL) Residential District, Hillside Overlay District, and Equestrian Overly District. The required front yard setback is 42 feet (plus or minus 5 feet),the required side yard setbacks are 10 and 15 feet and the required rear yard setback is 60 feet. The proposed front yard setback is 46 feet,the side yard setbacks are 10 feet and 15 feet,and the rear yard setback is 60 feet. Lot coverage is 24 percent, well below the maximum permitted lot coverage of 25 percent. The overall building height is 30 feet which is below the maximum permitted height limit within the Hillside Overlay District. d. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The proposed single-family residence is compatible with the existing residences in the surrounding area and is not expected to create a detrimental impact on the existing neighborhood. 4. The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)and the City's CEQA Guidelines. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-36 HDR DRC2019-00973— MOLINAR DESIGN, INC. MAY 26, 2021 Page 3 The project qualifies as a Class 3 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15303, which permits the construction of a single-family residence in a residential zone. The project is for the construction of a single-family residence in a residential zone and there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs in the staff's determination of exemption. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF MAY 2021. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Tony Guglielmo, Chairman ATTEST: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary I, Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed,and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 26'h day of May 2021, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Conditions of Approval RANCHO CUCAMONGA Community Development Department Project#: DRC2019-00973 Project Name: EDR - 2-STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING WITH A 4 CAR GARAGE AND POOL HOU Location: 10839 Carriage DR - 107453109-0000 Project Type: Hillside Development Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. APPROVAL FOR: A 6,871 square foot two-story single-family residence with an attached 4-car garage on a 20,724 square foot lot within the Very Low (VL) Residential District within the Hillside Overlay District and Equestrian Overlay District at 10839 Carriage Drive -APN: 1074-531-09. Standard Conditions of Approval 2. The applicant shall sign the Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval provided by the Planning Department. The signed Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval shall be returned to the Planning Department prior to the submittal of grading/construction plans for plan check, request for a business license, and/or commencement of the approved activity. 3. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 4. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval or Approval Letter, Conditions of Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 5. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption fee in the amount of $50.00. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing or within 5 days of the date of project approval. 6. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 7. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 8. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations. Exhibit H www.CityofRC.us Printed:5/18/2021 Project#: DRC2019-00973 Project Name: EDR - 2-STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING WITH A 4 CAR GARAGE AND POOL HOU Location: 10839 Carriage DR - 107453109-0000 Project Type: Hillside Development Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. All driveway approaches shall be constructed per City Standards and City Policy. 2. Provide HOA approval letter for the work to be done at HOA maintained area. 3. Following Development Impact Fees due prior to the issuance of a building permit. Drainage: Transportation: Library: Animal Center: Police: Park Acquisition In-Lieu/Park Impact: Park Improvement: Park Recreation Center: Standard Conditions of Approval 4. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Drive Appr. Street Trees Sidewalk 5. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. www.CityofRC.us Printed:5/18/2021 Page 2 of 5 Project#: DRC2019-00973 Project Name: EDR - 2-STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING WITH A 4 CAR GARAGE AND POOL HOU Location: 10839 Carriage DR - 107453109-0000 Project Type: Hillside Development Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 6. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch pvc with pull rope or as specified. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. 7. Street improvement plans per City Standards for all private streets shall be provided for review and approval by the City Engineer. Prior to any work being performed on the private streets, fees shall be paid and construction permits shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. 8. All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. 9. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. 10. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. www.CityofRC.us Printed:5/18/2021 Page 3 of 5 Project#: DRC2019-00973 Project Name: EDR - 2-STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING WITH A 4 CAR GARAGE AND POOL HOU Location: 10839 Carriage DR - 107453109-0000 Project Type: Hillside Development Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 11. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit Standard Conditions of Approval 1. The site/project is located in the designated Wildland-Urban Interface Fire Area. Please include this note on the plans. Construction materials and methods and automatic fire sprinkler systems are to be in compliance with Chapter 7A of the California Building Code, Section R337 of the California Residential Code, and Fire District Standard 49-1. This requirement applies to all structures including the pool house and the decks. Landscaping is required to comply with all applicable provisions of Fire District Standard 49-1. Please revise the landscaping accordingly. Fire pits and bowls are required to be fueled exclusively by natural gas or propane. Solid fuel fires are prohibited. Fire District Standard 49-1 has been uploaded to the Documents section. Building and Safety Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. When the Entitlement Review is approved submit complete construction drawings including structural calculations, energy calculations and soils report to Building and Safety for plan review in accordance with the current edition of the CA Building and Fire Codes including all local ordinances and standards which are effective at the time of Plan Check Submittal. The new structures are required to be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers per the CBC and Current RCFPD Ordinance. This project is located in the high fire area designated VHFHSZ and must comply to chapter 7A of the California Building Code as well as Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Standard No. 49-1 for structures and landscape. Where no public sewer is available within 200 feet an onsite wastewater system shall be designed and installed per the Local Agency Management Program Ordinance No. 936. A separate submittal and permit is required for this submittal. www.CityofRC.us Printed:5/18/2021 Page 4 of 5 Project#: DRC2019-00973 Project Name: EDR - 2-STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING WITH A 4 CAR GARAGE AND POOL HOU Location: 10839 Carriage DR - 107453109-0000 Project Type: Hillside Development Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Building and Safety Services Department www.CityofRC.us Printed:5/18/2021 Page 5 of 5 Hillside Design Review Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval for Hillside Design Review DRC2019-00973 I, Erick Molinar, on behalf of the property owners, as the applicant for the above referenced project number, hereby state that I am in agreement with and accept the conditions of approval for DRC2019-00973, for property located at 10839 Carriage Drive; APN: 1074-531-09, Rancho Cucamonga, California, as adopted by the Planning Commission on May 26, 2021 and as listed below and attached. Applicant Signature Date Conditions of Approval 1. The applicant shall sign this Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval prior to the submittal of plans for plan check, request for a business license, and/or commencement of the approved activity indicating agreement with and acceptance of the adopted Conditions of Approval prior to the submittal of grading/construction plans for plan check, request for a business license, and/or commencement of the approved activity. 2. All other conditions of approval related to Hillside Design Review DRC2019-00973. Exhibit I 1� w � i� it II 1 a ,r 4 n�A� ' � II i 1, I � Y �I. � •'1i V, L I S rl All / ! 1. it 7 � I i v I rn c PROPOSED STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING a� 0 U C N 10839 CARRIAGE DRIVE o RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA. 91737 0 0 cc OFF _ T L O L a) to O 0 7 O_ a) L f C { FM •. . r'• - - t - -far.. . 2r1 C kL M s. it ■o z 0 a) o NEE SOMEONE -� - - .0 xr+ •'�'�—,� --- - -u-. 0 Lib MOLIN Design Inc . k - I E r i c k E M o I i n a r Iv 1 132 S . Spence Street Los Angeles , CA 90023 c 3 2 3 . 4 0 2 . 3 5 2 4 o wwwk. mo �ilnardessi g lgn . com -0 # ,R % :. i Project Title: - . ,. _._ �__ Single Family Yr., a 12 Residence I a) 0 10839 Carriage Drive lll Rancho Cucamonga CA 91737 v CZ Owner: 0) Jaime Enrique Herrera Avila 3 PROJECT DATA PROJECT DIRECTORY VICINITY MAP - Job Address: 10839 Carriage Drive rn Owner: Jaime Enrique Herrera Avila Rancho Cucamonga CA 91734 10839 Carriage Drive Legal Description: LOT 52 OF TRACT MAP NO.12332-2,IN THE CITY OF Rancho Cucamonga CA 91737 Construction Drawings 0 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, Deer Canyon 0 'L STATE OF CALIFORNIA AS PER MAPRECORDED IN Date: 03-25-2019 w M.B.218,PAGES 63-71.OF MAPS,IN THE OFFICE OF THE Designer: Molinar Design Inc. COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. 1132 S. Spence Street Scale: AS NOTED ELEVATION=85.247 FEET(2005') Los Angeles, CA90023 Rev.No. Rev./Issue Date./Issue Y1 FD.CHIS SQUARE ON TOP OF CURB LOCATED AT SOUTH 323.402.3524 SIDE OF D/W 82 FT.SOUTH OF POWER POLE#1072464E ALONG Structural Engineer: Sarami Engineering Consulting Tackstemst 4 Spirit Landscaping REV #1 : m a N THE EAST SIDE OF HERMOSA AVENUE,SOUTH OF WILSON 1225 W. Huntington Dr. St#1 AVENUE Arcadia, CA 91007 Almond St 626.356.7521 E Contractors 0 APN: 1074-531-09-0000 BM#80 Civil Engineer: AJA ENGINEERING, INC. Gardner Medical o L Zoning: R CIVIL&STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING o Lot Area: 18,924.5 S.F. 7411 FLORENCE AVE. N a m DOWNEY, CA 90240 Hidden farm Rd x c Bulding SF: First floor 3,494.00 SF (562)760-6040 and(562)277-2318 Stamp: U o 1 e Second floor: 3,377.00 SF 8 Carriage Drive a> Total: 6,871.00 SF Soils Engineer: A.G.I Geotechical, Inc. carrari St � 16555 Sherman Way, Suite A o a Van Nuys, CA 91406 HGS Financial roup �a4ch Dr Deck SF: 162 SF 818.785.5244 California Patio SF: 182 SF Mechanical Hillside P SITE / Community Church � v Porch SF: 96 SF Plumbing Engineer: Perfect Design/Engineering Inc. y Thermasol Steambath Balconies: 46 SF 2416 W. Valley Blvd. Alhambra, CA 91803 w90 R'd9eo��y a Breezeway: 72 SF °''Rd 626.289.8808 f° Garage#1: 420 SF The Church of Wilderness DrQ Sheet Title: >_ Garage#2: 420 SF Jesus Christ of Latter— Cali. Patio Bathroom: 44 SF Hillside Rd Hillside Rd Hillside Rd Building Footprint 4,757 SF m �; Lot Coverage: 4,757/ 18,924= 0.25 25%25% MAX. Monaco P: IR rb 12 �� Deer Canyon Rear Yard Lot Coverage: 361 /7,212= 0.05 05% 30% MAX. Sprinkler System: All levels + garage v Apple Beechwood Dr Was a) Rancho De Philo Winery o pp Ln TITLE Parking: 4 cars Poplar St 2-Car Garage: 840 SF o g Wilson Ave Wilson Ave Wilson Ave SETBACK DETERMINATION = 0 Hermosa School wSHEET 0 Side Yard Setback: 10'-0" (West) 15'-0" (East) Front Yard Setback: 42'-0" Sheet No. Rear Yard Setback: 60'-0" 0 0 No. of Lots Used: 1 c A- 000I I o ui c� at Q C0 m O U C O 7 O L EXISTING o BUILDING `o I co a N27° p4017E — _ 2098.04TC M i 2097.37FL II I I a- - '-3" 19'-1 11 19'-9" 21'-0" 46'-3" o I I I I Ex. 22'-011 II I I BLOCK Wq�� 51-811 Ln c° --- 19 7• CDII II BATHROOM 62 P.L. II II 44.00 SQ. FT • � k 7L W � LLO II II o O II II _ N II II o O II II � II II El 00 2093 G — Z II II ti FD. LT. LS.4430 BREEZEWAY a / 72.00 SQ. FT a a ON PL-PROD. II II OOO a a a o 0 : � CALIFORNIA a a° NF a 2095.15TCa 4215 TRAIL 7.0' DRAINAGE N PATIO ONTYARD SET13AC 2094.49FL 182.0o SQ. FT 4EASEMENT EASEMENT 6) � O I I II 42 0 F a a a a a a DWY a o II II o a a II II F, 1 —1 a L) SPA °° a) II II JACUZZI 7'-9„ a M EX. VINYL FENCE a II II _ o II II E a a i 2093.91TC o 2093.25FL 1ST LO R - II I I 34 00 Q � a ° � a D 0 °, OT S FT. 6, 1.0 Q. a MOLINAR OPEN DECK O H= 6.0 Q �U CA O IA ATI =1 .00 Q.F . iI it r1 11 rh c ECIK=1 .00 ao BAL ON[ S= .00 Q. PORCH ayi E r i c k E M o l i n a r ti B EZEWA =7 0 FT 96.00 SO. FT a i CV C0 1 1 3 2 S . S p e n c e S t r e e t L- II II GARA #1 42 .O0S .FT O a a a ; M Los Angeles , CA 90023 c II II GA GE = 0.0 SQ a a a 3 2 3 4 0 2 3 5 2 4 Brick@molinardesign . com II II B H O =4 0 FT I www . molinardesign . com -0 I A Project Title:I I I T 5 T . 123 -2 a' a � .B. ais -71 p a '46-4" II II a I Single Family II II Residence II II I a a I ^�, a a o 10839 Carriage Drive EX. CONCRETE I I I I I Rancho Cucamonga CA 91737 2 cf) CHANNEL DRAIN I a a a Owner: OPEN DECK 42'�FRONT Y a 2091.56TC 0 Jaime Enrique Herrera Avila N a YARD sErBAC 2090.89FL J II II GA x o V co • I I I I 420.00 S N a a a Construction Drawings o � II II _ I` II II I I �� REARYARDSET sA j G Date: 03-25-2019 wo xx Scale:AS NOTED Q O N o i > Rev.No. Rev./Issue Date./Issue REV #1: El 1:1 E: ILO _W I TELX0 80'-2 N ' ' ' ' ' O 190'-6" SLP - L ti o i ----- 30.00' W N II II 1 . 131 P .L. � FD. LT. LS.4430 Stamp: ON PL-PROD. U II II -->___�__-- EX. BLOCK WALL ]momm L o z I I I I N 15°5311 7"W O II II o Q O 2088.96TC 2022.28FL Sheet Title: W J EXISTING I M W I BUILDING M FFEXISTING W BUILDING 0 DC FD. CHIS. SQUARE ON TOP OF CURB LOCATED AT SOUTH SIDE � SITE PLAN OF D/W 82 FT. SOUTH OF POWER POLE #1072464E ALONG THE O U EAST SIDE OF HERMOSA AVENUE, SOUTH OF WILSON AVENUE. Sheet No. 2090.13TC FD. SPK& TR.12332- 2089.46FL � J C A- 1 00 PROPOSED SITE PLAN2 SCALE 1/8" = 1 '-O" 2 Q CO m O U C O 7 O L 1= L O O Q co 2X RAFTER TAILS M L 2111.16 2ND FLR. F.C. W -UU Ll H U- J - -- -- -- o 5,8"SMOOTH TROWEL FINISH STUCCO OVER LATH 18"TYPICAL TYVEK-DUPONT EAVE OVERHANG 3 OVER 2 LAYERS GRADE'D'PAPER 0 O o 21 2ND FLR. F.F. m p G�j M _ 1ST FLR.F.C.-' Cn a°gip � - - - - - -- -- co4-7 m — o WEEP Q SCREED 2091.75 MAIN F.F. - - - - STONE VENEER 0 c 0 U C TRAVERTINE MOLINA 1b @ Ss ii qy rih II rih q. .2) y E r i c k E M o I i In a r 1 1 3 2 S . S p e n c e S t r e e t L o s A n g el e s , C A 9 0 0 2 3 c PROPOSED FRONT ELEVATION NORTH A 3 2 3 4 0 2 3 5 2 4 0 erick@moIinardesign . com w w W . m o l i In a r d e s i g n . c o m -0 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" Project Title: 0 Single Family L Residence _ — — --- --- --- — — — — — 10839 Carriage Drive ---- _- — — — — — — — Rancho Cucamonga CA 91737 _ --- - -- -- Owner: -- — — — Jaime Enrique Herrera Avila 0 CO — — — — Construction Drawings .o — U L — — — — — Date: 03-25-2019 0 AS NOTED — 2111.16 2ND FLR.F.C. 2111.16 2ND FLR. F.C. Scale: � -- -- -- - - - - - - -0 0U UU Lf U U ti U - - - - - - -- -- -- Rev.No. Rev./Issue Date./Issue REV #1: Co Co U 60 60 O U N W O b Stamp: ° C? 2102.50 2ND FLR. F.F. 2102.50 2ND FLR. F.F. m N - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - E % N ch 2101.25 1ST FLR. F.C. 2101.25 1ST FLR.F.C.M o -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - -- -- o �° M p 19 1 EAO/ CD Sheet Title: N o U C N O) 2091.75 MAIN F.F. 2091.75 MAIN F.F. ELEVATIONS 2091.20 GARAGE F.F. a� c? _- CV c _ — O .Q _ O Sheet No. O J C N U C O7 A- 300 0 PROPOSED SIDE ELEVATION ( EAST) co SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" a CO m O U C O 7 O L L 0 Y \ Q Q co 2111.16 2ND FLR. F.C. 3: ad c L O 0 L Q O 2102.50 2ND FLR. F.F. ih o 2101.25 1ST FLR.F.C.'' o N N4-7 N N O 0 CO----------/q c co A A Lll�A L Cn c m _T C O U O 2091.75 MAIN F.F. O U �U N 0- co (n L L C O U C 7 MOLINA I� V 1b pa -% ii qy nll 11 rih q, a) y E r i c k E M o I i In a r 1 1 3 2 S . S p e n c e S t r e e t L o s A n g el e s , C A 9 0 0 2 3 c 3 2 3 . 4 0 2 . 3 5 2 4 0 PROPOSED REAR ELEVATION (SOUTH ) Brick@oIiIna desig n com w w w . m o l i n a r d e s i g n . c o m -0 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" N Project Title: 0 Single Family L Residence 10839 Carriage Drive Rancho Cucamonga CA 91737 Owner: Jaime Enrique Herrera Avila C2 _ o CO Construction Drawings o Y � U Date: 03-25-2019 w 0 2111.16 2ND FLR. F.C. Scale:AS NOTED Rev.No. Rev./Issue Date./Issuea REV #1: A A - a) b? E po U C O L U N O C Stamp: ° 2102.50 2ND FLR. F.F. _ - - - - - - - ce)' E c� 2101.25 1ST FLR. F.C. -' N o —41 oio -- _ — co CT Sheet Title:71, r ELEVATIONS 2091.75 MAIN F.F. Q -_— � - fir_— - — - - c? c O O U (N) POOL Sheet No. O SIN co J C N U C O7 A- 301 0 PROPOSED SIDE ELEVATION (WEST) co SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" a C0 Co iv D c O U C 7 O L E (E)2x8 RIDGE BEAM `o 2x8 ROOF RAFTERS @ 16"O.C.TYP. c� (N) 12"TYPICAL T EAVE OVERHANG (N)FASCIA TO MATCH EXISTING L 2111.16 2ND FLR. F.C. °� - - -- - 0 2-2X4 TOP PLATES R-30 INSULATION 3 s 1/2"GYPSUM BOARD a) V g "ER LATH STUCCO (E)2x6 CLG.JST.@ 16"O.C. Q O OV WALLS&CEILINGS TYP. L 2x6 BLOKING OPEN c0 (N) BEDROOM #3 (N) WCL SPACE (N) LAUNDRY (N) WCL (N) BEDROOM #1 °0 0 ROOM > 2x6 STUDS @16"O.C. - FULL HEIGHT a� kd 2102.50 2ND FLR. F.F. R13 INSULATION U) 2101.25 1ST FLR. F.C.M 0 4-7 c m U) c m • T O (N) POWDER (N) HALL (N) COATS (N) ENTRY (N) DINING ROOM ROOM 0 5/8 PLYWOOD SUB-FLOOR U R19 INSULATION aa) WEEP SCREED Q- 2091.75 MAIN F.F. 2090.00 GREAT RM. F.F. b L) 0 U C 7 MOLINAR O 1b V ii it rh 11 rh q, a� .y E r i c k E M o I i n a r 1 1 3 2 S . S p e n c e S t r e e t L o s A n g el e s , C A 9 0 0 2 3 c 3 2 3 . 4 0 2 . 3 5 2 4 0 QQ erick@molinardesign . com PROPOSED CROSS SECTION www . molinardesign . com SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" — — — — — — — Project Title: 0 - -- - - - - - Single Family ---- ---- - - - - Residence (E)2x8 RIDGE BEAM _ 10839 Carriage Drive 2x8 ROOF RAFTERS @- — 2 12 Rancho Cucamonga CA 91737 -- 16"O.C.-TYP. _ — — — Owner: - _ Jaime Enrique Herrera Avila (N)12"TYPICAL 12 EAVE OVERHANG 4® _ Q (N)FASCIA TO MATCH EXISTING 2111.16 2ND FLR. F.C. c - - Construction Drawings o 2-2X4 TOP PLATES I I :�E U R-30 INSULATIONLU EX.s "STUCCO �� 1/2"GYPSUM BOARD Date: 03-25-2019 OVER LATH (E)2x6 CLG.JST.@ 16"O.C. WALLS&CEILINGS TYP. 0 Scale:AS NOTED 2x6 BLOKING OPEN OPEN OPEN Rev.No. Rev./Issue Date./Issu 0- TO BELOW TO BELOW TO BELOW REV #1: 2x6 STUDS @16"O.C. - FULL HEIGHT o c� o a) E 2102.50 2ND FLR. F.F. R13 INSULATION 2101.25 1ST FLR. F.C.M a m c (N) GREAT ROOM Stamp: E U O (N) HALL - (N) FOYER (N) PORCH co CT 5/8 PLYWOOD SUB-FLOOR— (N) DECK R19INSULATION 0 WEEP SCREED Sheet Title: 2091.75 MAIN F.F. � T RM. F.F.,��\ /\ /\ /\ \/\ \ /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\//\//\//\//\//\//\ \�\ \ \�\ \�\ \ \f\/\/\/\/\/\/ / / // / // // // // // // /%//%\//%\//%\//%//%\//%//%\/\/ ///%\//%//%\//%\//%\//%\//%\//%\//%\//%\//%\//%\//%\//%\//%\//%\//%\//%\//%\//%\//%\//%\//%\//%\//%\//%\//%\//%\//%\//%\//%\//%\//% \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ //j 77777 /// \// \////////\///////////\////////� j/j/j/j/j/j/j/j/j 2091 0 ORCH F.F. \\//\\//\\ \\ \\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\// \ \\\\ \\\\\ \\\\\\\\j\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\l N POOL / / / / / /� /� /� /� / /� /� /� /� /� /� /� /� /� /� /� /� /� /� /� /� /� /� /� /� /� /� /� /� /�/ /i/ / // / // // // / /� /� /� /� /� /� /� /� /� /� /� /� /� /� O \ \ \i\r\r\i\i r\r \i \i\i\i\< \i\/\r\r /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/ \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\ \/\ \/\ \ \ \ \ \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\ \ \ \ \ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ POOL / i / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / \i / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / \ \ \ \ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \ \ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ /\/\/\ /\/\/\/\/\ \/ \/ /\% /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\ \/\/\/\/\ \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\ \NEW U N DE RP I N I N G/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/, \ \ \ \ 77 \ \77/ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \FOOTING TYP. /\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ /\/\/\ HOUSE / / / // 77 // // // // // // // // // // ! // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // / / // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // / / / // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // / // // // // // // //i.//,/ o \ \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\ /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/ /\ \ /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/ /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \ \\ \\4 \ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \ \ \\ \\ \ \\ \\\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ // // ///// // // // // // // // // // / // // // // // // // // / //x/////x//x//�//x//x//x �//x//x// Sheet No. J A-4 C N C 0 O7 ■ 0 PROPOSED LONGITUDINAL SECTION co SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" a 10839 Carriage Drive Rancho Cucamonga CA 91737 oe MOLINAR Material Board �vi Foam Stucco Corbels FauxWood MENOMONEE � ( Corinth Tumbled Travertine r Spanish OutdoorWall Light Coronado Stone Products Wrought Iron Guardrail Ledgestone Huron Faux at Balcony Stone Veneer Smooth Trowel Finish Stucco Spanish Style Wood Garage Door Polar Bear Behr Paint 790001 -641000 1'-4" 20'-2" 6" 4'-8" 6" 8'-1" 6" 10'-0" 6" 19'-9" 20'-6" 6" 9'-6" 6" s= 01 46'-3" 3'-0" L, 8" 12'-0" 7" 3'-0" 2'-3" L, 2'-0" 17'-3" 7'-6" 2'-6" 0 10 NJ A%, LF C N 7 O L_ — — 5 E o (N) PANTRY (N) BUTLERS PANTRY LO 24"MIN. - � 5 5 0 0 M � � T L ____ / 0 a) DW IFR ° CD 0 0 12 N N (N) CALIFORNIA PATIO to o o (N) KITCHEN MW Q CV n — N ®gog® (N) 2 CAR GARAGE 0') 0 0 ®®® r N 4 2 V) (N) ISLAND ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 0 (N) DINING ROOM V) ° L 0 0 0 N M L co M CY) c O O O CV U M g � U N O i O Ll N II MOLINAR D e s i g n I n c O a II N E r i c k E M o l i n a r °� 1 1 3 2 S . S p e n c e S t r e e t (N) D CK I Los Angeles , CA 90023 c 3 2 3 4 0 2 3 5 2 4 0 erick@molinardesign . com ' (N) FOYER www . molinardesign . com L °O - (N) GREAT ROOM I I - - 0O °' 00 0 2091.75 2" (N) PORCH CC 0 , C) U') 3 (N) HALL I 1 DN N M Project Title: o N N N Single Family L Residence up O = 10839 Carriage Drive Rancho Cucamonga CA 91737 M M Owner: �, Jaime Enrique Herrera Avila 3 II _ (N) FIRE PLACE O �' ° Construction Drawings o co U L Date: 03-25-2019 w O o Scale:AS NOTED N Q 6 6 Rev.No. Rev./Issue Date./Issue LJ REV #1 : 0 0 (N) GUEST SUITE o 2 LIVING ROOM 7 (N) MUD �' E \ / o N (N) HALL All Stamp: (N) DEC 6 30"MIN. E L) U O CO c6 C° 04 (N) POWDER Z (N) LAUNDRY (N) 2 CAR GARAGE O o 0 0 ROOM ROOM E co r' N N O 5 41 10Z3 (N) WCL (N) STORAGE Sheet Title: �' O o 0 2 (N) GUEST SUITE O O BEDROOM z 9 10 ILFIRST FLOOR 3 T � (N) BATH ROOM Co PLAN 0 ° L ° N F F � - U Q N 1'-8" 2'-0" o o Sheet No. 4 0 NEW FIRST 1'-4" 6'-5" 27'-3" 7" 3'-0" 2'-9" 2'-6" 8'-6" 5'-0" 11'-0" 5'-0" 5'-0" N N ° J C C6 FLOOR PLAN 1'-4" 6'-5" 14'-3" 6" 01 11'-6" 6" 4'-3" T-9" T-3" 2'-6" 6" 1 U-0" 6" 20'-0" 6" 1 ,0 LM SCALE: 1/4" = V-0" = N 1'-4" 6'-5" 27'-3" 16'-3" 34'-6" Y� —2 ■ 0 0 WALL LEGEND p 2X4 STUD WALL 85'-9" 2 Q 75'-011 o co s= 01 a 19'-0" 27'-3" 20'-9" 7'-0" 1'-0" 0 U C 6" 18'-6" 6" 26'-3" 6" 20'-3" 6" 740 '-0" 1'-0" 2'-0" ° 19'-0" 2'-10" J# 4'-0" 12'-8" 4'-0" T-9" 6'-11" 6'-0" 7'-10" 5'-0" 1'-0" E `o O P co _ _ T Q O O L Q (N) MASTER BEDROOM J a) o O o 04 (N) DECK (N) BEDROOM #1 0 a� = m o 14 00 M M 0 6 d 4-7 co z 6 C (N) WCL 6 Nco N O M O O U 3 "M I - 6 ° O U z T (N) WCL 8 U) = 9 (N) LAUNDRY 00 ROOM .5 Cfl 0 0 M v qt / (N) LN o AV- 5:1 Eil MOLINARU 0 - @Ssiiqyrh IIrhq, M q LM r y E r i c k E M o I i n a r CU 1 1 3 2 S . S p e n c e S t r e e t -2 L o s A n g el e s , C A 9 0 0 2 3 c 3 2 3 . 4 0 2 . 3 5 2 4 0 _ erick@molinardesign . com O w w w . m o l i n a r d e s i g n . c o m -a o o o N M r*_ Project Title: 0 Single Family O L ° OPEN - Residence 00 o OPEN c� TO BELOW OPEN 0 0 0 N 10 TO BELOW 72 DN O TO BELOW ° N N 10839 Carriage Drive � Rancho Cucamonga CA 91737 cc O Owner: �, 0 Jaime Enrique Herrera Avila 0 co Oco Construction Drawings o L Y U M _ o Date: 03-25-2019 w _ O M Scale:AS NOTED 0 Rev.No. Rev./Issue Date./Issu ti 00 6 3 "M1 REV #1: L z _ CU 0 0 iv (N) WCL g E m 6 N o ZL O O °(N) BEDROOM #2 4_6M 6 5_8 6 8-1 Stamp: s= ° - E U T _ O O 8'-2" 6" o, Lo, 5'-8" 6" 8'-011 `° o 0 ri 0 E N (N) BEDROOM #3 q M — in o c 6 z Sheet Title: _ (N) WCL N J U O O O CO c0 in ui 30"MIN. ° SECOND FLOOR AV— z *,v 0 PLAN 0 0 U .Q NEW SECOND " " " ' " " .. Sheet No. 19-0 3-5 8-8 10-2 4-0 21 -9 5-0 3-0 O m FLOOR PLAN J 6" 18'-6" 6" V 2'-11" 6" 8'-2" 6" 5-8" 6" 8'-0" 6" 20'-3" 6" V 7'-0" 1'-0" o. SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-O" A-201 L, 19'-0" 3'-5" 8'-8" 35'-11" 8'-0" o WALL LEGEND rco 2X4 STUD WALL 75'-0" O a 2 ,v,a2o2o Vent catculabr-oft8glfa co co THE MAIN ELECTRICAL SERVICE PANEL SHALL HAVE A RESERVED SPACE TO ALLOW FOR B INSTALLATION OF A DOUBLE POLE CIRCUIT BREAKER FOR A FUTURE SOLAR ELECTRIC INSTALLATION . THE RESERVED SPACE SHALL BE POSITIONED AT THE OPPOSITE (LOAD) END FROM THE INPUT FEEDER LOCATION OR MAIN CIRCUIT ' O'Hagin Vent Calculator LOCATION AND SHALL BE PERMANENTLY MARKED AS "FOR FUTURE SOLAR ELECTRIC" 4 :12 PITCH ROOF (TYP) 0 Step 1: DETERMINE SQUARE FEET OF CODE-REQUIRED VENTILATION )) ) Square Feet:4770 - Compliance Method: 150 `o = Total Square Feet of Code Required Ventilation > > > > > > > > > > 4 :12 PITCH ROOF (TYP ) : > c>3 Ste 2: CONVERT SQ. FT. OF CODE-REQUIRED VENTILATION TO SQ. IN )) ) )) )) )) )) )) y o x 144=4580 Total Square inches of Code Required Ventilation Ste 3: DETERMINE QUANTITY OF O HAGIN VENTS REQUIRED - �Q } > p >y >y >y >y >y >y >y >y >y >y >y >y >y >y >y >y >y >y >y Q. � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � >; >; >; >; >; >; >; >; >; >; >; >,�> J I 0 Y G Total Vents Required for sq. inches: Tapered Low-Profile High-Profile Model S 72.0 sq. in N FVA 97.5 sq. in N FVA )) )) o )) ) )) )) ��O I JQ' )) )) )) )) )) )) �, �, �, �, �, �, �, )) ) )) )) )) I o`� �, �, �, �, �, �, httpsl/ohagin.conVventcalwlator! 112 O N D� v, o tico �� Cn /4tt : 12" PITCH ROOF 0 HIP ROOF >) >) >) >) >) >) >) >) >) >) >) >) �, �, �, �, BORAL SPANISH TILE >) >) >) >) >) >) >) >) >) >) >) >) �, �, �, �, �, �, �, �, �, �, �, �, CLAYLITE )) )) )) )) )) )) (N) OWENS CORNING: MINERAL SURFACED ROLL o ICC ESR - 1017 )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) CLASS 'A' GAF #75 BASE SHEET )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) ROLLED /TORCH-DOWN �\ �\ �\ �\ �\ �\ �\ �\ �\ �\ 0 MOLIN R A )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) �� A 1b @ % II qy all II ih q. ',- c LM E r i c k E M o I i n a r )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) %4 : 12 PITCH ROOF �� I �XQ - 1 1 3 2 s . Spence Street TOO 0 Los Angeles , CA 90023 c_ O 3 2 3 . 4 0 2 3 5 2 4 0 . g Brick@molinardesign . com `CC www . moIinardesign . corn -0 )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) Project Title: o �o Single Family Residence )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) ) y, US Tile® by BOf al® • )> )> )> )) )) )) )) >) )) �T� )) )) ) �� ,,� ( 10839 Carriage Drive Build somethin reat� O Rancho Cucamonga CA 91737 2 9 g )> )> )> )) )) )) ��Q �� )) )) )) ) Q� Owner: )) )) )) )) )) O� �� )) )) )) )) ) -� Jaime Enrique Herrera Avila PRODUCT INFORMATION CO )) )) )) )) \\I )) )) )) )) )) )) )) ) %4" : 12" PITCH ROOF �, �, �, �, �, �, �, �, �, )> )> )> )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) ) Construction Drawings o Profile: ClaylliteO U Color Name: Merlot )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) ) Date: 03-25-2019 w SKU Number: 2lJNDlJ6072 Scale:AS NOTED Product Type: Lightweight Rev.No. Rev./Issue Date./Issu REV #1: Color: Red, Grey MUItICOIOr )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) �� ,i >,i >,i >,i >,i >,i >,i >,i >,i >,i >,i >,i >,i >,i >,i >,i >,i >,i >,i >,i >,i >,i >,i >,i >,i >,i >,i >,i >,i >�i Available Regions: a Nationwide C) )> )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) _ L LO Stamp: Tile Specifications I 00 C C Cool Rated Product E Size: 18 x 13 O Reflectivity: 0.22 Coverage:e: 88 O > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -0 g Aged Ref. (3 yr): 0.23 to Approx. Installed Weight: 590 Ibs > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > CT Emmisivit 0.83 y Pieces per Pallet: 336 p Aged Em. (3 yr) 0.87 Squares per Pallet: 3.8 < E SRI: 18* Approx. Weight per Pallet: 2300 Ibs )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) Aged SRI (3 yr): 21 CRRC ID#: 0133a Sheet Title: Seller ID#: 0942 *Calculated Aged value 1.au° ao allRoo8com) )> )> )> )> )> �Q 4 :12 PITCH ROOF (TYP)�, The printed color shown here may vary from actual available tile color and should not be used to color match. Please contact your local Sales Representative for actual the samples. �� > > y/ �OOF LA Initial Weathered )) )) )) )) O,C� �, �, , , , , , , � � � � Solar Reflectance 0.22 0.23 Thermal Emittance 0.83 0.87 )) )) )) 4 :12 PITCH ROOF (TYP) )) )) _ , �,_, �,_, �, �, �, _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Sheet No. R Rated Product ID Number 0133a )) �°i�°i�° �° �� >1 COOL ROOF Licensed Seller ID Number 0942 �� i 4 :12 PITCH ROOF (TYP) co ILI /q, RATING COUNCII, Clxssilication Production Line B v; Cool Roof Rating Council nitino art dotermined ror a fixed set of conditions.and may not he appropriate for delennming senwnml energy l,erl'ornuoive.The nclunl effect of w,htr trlltctance and Ihernaal emittnnce — � on budding performance may vary. A2 0 3 0 Manufacturer of protbtct stipulates that these rmings were dwermined in accordance with the applicable NEW ROOF PLAN Cool Roof Rating Council pr wOures. SCALE: 1/4" = V-0" a LEGEND — EXISTING STRUCTURE ITY OF RANCH CUCAMONGA EXISTING WALL AS NOTED o EXISTING CHAIN LINK FENCE TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY MAP zoo EXISTING WOOD/IRON FENCE AS NOTED --------- FINISHED SURFACE LINE 10839 CARRIAGE DRIVE = CENTERLINE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. 917370 PROPERTY LINE —(98)— EXISTING CONTOUR ELEV. �98)— PROPOSED CONTOUR ELEV. EXISTING PSL PIPE SLOPE BUILDING TC TOP OF CURB — — I I I I - - oo'401,E FL FLOWLINE — � � � _ J / / l �2?099?8.094�Tj�C III II II — I ¢ / I 2097.37FL SCO SEWER CLEANOUT II II EX. BLOCK WALL A/C ASPHALT CONCRETE FF FINISH FLOOR II II _ Z_ I I II I UT UNKNOWN UTILITY III II I _ 1�' P.A. PLANTING AREA I II I FS FINISH SURFACE 4i � FG FINISH GRADE V II II %00FH FIRE HYDRANT LT. LS.4430 \ I II 1 II II 1 II I II ON PL—PROD. / HT. HEIGHT I I II I II 2095.15TC 15 TRAIL 7.0 DRAINAGE — —— GAS METER I II 12094.49FL M EASEMENT II II EASEMENT I II I x105.50 EXISTING ELEVATION I III II I DWY II I I 105.50 PROPOSED ELEVATION I III II I I II I II II I i II I EXISTING UTILITY AS NOTED � ff I EX. VINYL FENCE II II I EXISTING TREE i II II I II 12093.91TC 2093.25FL LOT 52 II I II II I I II I I II II I II I I No II I II II CPO TR. 12332-2 II I II II oo M.B. 218/63-71 . I II III II I I �� I II II v I I III II I �� I II II I I III II I II I EX. CONCRETE CHANNEL DRAIN I I I I J�III IIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIII IIIII\III I I �0, II lIIII II Il i IIII 11IIII I I 2091.56TC 2090.89FL o 90o0 I I I II I III I I I �o� S P I I ILFD. — -- \ II II � 000, I III II I o0 I I II T. LS.4430 191.13' ® I II ION PL—PROD. EX. BLOCK WALL I I - - II II � I II I 2088.96TC I I II i I2022.28FL CITY BENCHMARK EXISTING BUILDING II I II I GRAPHIC SCALE EXISTING I I I II I BUILDING io zo ao BM NUMBER #80 I I DV II io o s I FD. CHIS. SQUARE ON TOP OF CURB LOCATED AT SOUTH SIDE li II II I II I I ( IN FEET ) OF D/W 82 FT. SOUTH OF POWER POLE #1072464E ALONG THE II 1 inch = 10 ft. EAST SIDE OF HERMOSA AVENUE, SOUTH OF WILSON AVENUE. I� I 1I 12089.46FL FD. SPK&W. FLUSH, FITS PER TR.1 ELEVATION = 85.247 FEET (2005 ) 332-2 M.B. 218 LEGAL DESCRIPTION PREPARED BY: TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY MAP JOB NO: A J A ADS: 018-095 LOT 52 OF TRACT MAP NO. 12332-29 IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY ADDRESS: 10839 CARRIAGE DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. 91737 DATE: 04/17/18 OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA AS PER MAP RECORDED IN M.B. 2189 P.O. BOX 1 633 APN: 1074-531 -09-0000 SHEET 1 of 1 PAGES 63-71 . OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. DOWNEY, CA 90240 APN: 1074-531 -09-0000 (562) 760-6040 TEL ENGINEER SCALE: 1 "= 10' DRAWN BY: D.P. CHECKED BY: A.A. EMAIL. cdseng@yahoo.com ALEJANDRO J. ALATORRE DATE R.C.E. 32761 , EXP. 6/30/18 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA rp cn aTo r � zip C2 C7 � � � � -4IT1 m CO) — m o M o r L r z T cn a -0 a _ _ � -u � � D cn -q -1 � rt� i rn C� Z N y, y = C I I m I I m 0 can D o r �. *4 40 o T000 � a oa o o 00 � z � � � � r Z oTom m �� o � o m I I I Ci7 .L Z II T � (7) N m m -U rm 0 = m m TI -0 c m D cn -Ti � � u m u C TI m m m m W v C Z N CA x x x D m z z r z z cn m r O X m z x x x x a a . . . . �n �n o �n _ _ _ Cm C7 rn W = y a C� �1 v --I = m F v> z z � m m � cn z z O z = o cn p m z � T p N N >O C R1 0 = T y CD Z c� c� N c� m z � z om m N z m z z z Z o o ?� 0 m m p m c z m c-) o m o :cm cm C7 o = Z �_ p D �7 O p -Tic O O D O r c O = D O r D D m c m p C� r,I w `< C7 cn CD Ma m -n y C W Cif m r m D m � D F � zo ao no z Z Op z 1 � y Z m a o o c Z D m � o m C D -1 — a CD a C DCIO 1 Oz m m r C Z M C O O z � m r zz � z m C O T N O N Z r T o m m m m -Ti T T W o C m C) m z z o W Z CD T = C p m m T C7 .� COP) D T IV cn - - _ C r r T CD Z = * n o p a T Z = O O - p a mT y MN _ ,00'LZl - - - - - M„55,LZ.lLN - - N— nco T N v c:, _ - cai» � � a W� - - - V � a, 00 x x X x CO)C -7 Z a C I Zo N m� m I a o = N o0 o � � m CD Z m Z � Z�' Ln C C) Z a) y M T = IH .4 T S0,110Z — - - - - - - — - - — - - - - — — — --tg g Z- = Cm = 90*CLOZ L�'Z8 _ _ o �"� T SO'�LO —_ —_ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 9 LOB - - - - - - - - - - -0 80Z a y - - — - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 8Z'6 x r No m a x N W Cm o N a v II m T W CA C* a a00 00 o N Z a ^' x � v CD o cn PO . . C CO Z = CO) CA Cl � V m o 0 i I o 11` W CA 0o z I x CA) v N N C:) O N 00 O N CO) CA I o�Q2 o m>< Q ' c x I W g C) o — zz C-) � O OD p in 00 CD x � W r- x O0 x C N O CO x r N IV r O 00 i W DD X DD CID D0 0 I r C) m < 0 > Z m r p o 0 co J = O m r I 00 U) MC ) O - - a 0 r =X 0 (00 z a O o� IM �: ul Cl CY) C 0 I D 0 -o N I WN N > I Cif o 90 r., I0 r z O y ■ ■ I a CoI CO) p x n 110 > O O C7 X C. � I 4 O D o O O 0-) WX I 0 0 ON W D c> x ' 0O m o (n / N x C 00 coco bo rnC I w N I � %M v m J I z - Ni M z � I W w*4 m x Ilim O cn w*4 C7 I j o 2 ■ m D obp z O CA 0 w N ZJ J p rn m D I X 0-) � CA _ _ - - — =8 9.3 0' z CD O _ — -- — _ R=460.00' — 9NIiSN3 " L 00 }1ldM3OIS _ _ — / CD N I V( O l 0 Z _ V � / �095.g4 EXISTING - o ® / o SIDEWALK -x` �20g765 oo O� _ - - - - - - - - - - - -�� 20 - - - - - - NN - - - - _ _ _-I - 95.6'8 c c0 c0 z D — N�V co CD TI SA SA C)CD N N I I cn cD m 000cco Nrn o 0o AN VI �cn O rn rnw w rc rn O .Z7N 00 v 90 N p w C)C) (D 0PO Ln r � 1�1 x_ L=83.48' I w — R=430.00' C A G E D D R _I V _ x li -0 E D N OIND xCD N c0 m � � m � 0 °° N o 0 D �7 C N II w z 000 : � O = � O o O� D = O c O 01 Z O m C N ` ♦ z O O ... O o C ... O 0 C) m m z n p o D u - c� C O c0 n o D CA r, m Z m o c- = D m m m0 D � O o a) 00 00 ZO D D � O O . . TJ \ c0 Ul A r^ 0 DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS April 6, 2021 7:00 p.m. Mena Abdul-Ahad, Assistant Planner HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2019-00973 — MOLINAR DESIGN, INC. - Site plan and architectural review of a 6,871 square foot two-story single-family residence with an attached 4- car garage on a 18,924 square foot lot within the Very Low (VL) Residential District within the Hillside Overlay District and Equestrian Overlay District at 10839 Carriage Drive - APN: 1074- 531-09. This item is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA guidelines under CEQA Section 15303 — New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures. Site Characteristics: The 18,924 square foot vacant project site is located on the north side of Carriage Drive. The property dimensions are approximately 89 feet along the north property line, 191 feet along the east property line, 127 feet along the south property line, and 197 along the west property line. The downslope lot has an elevation of approximately 220 feet as measured at the curb face along the north property line to the south property line, for a maximum grade change of approximately 9 feet from the north to south property lines. The site is covered in short grasses. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Very Low (VL) Residential Very Low (VL) District Site Vacant Land Residential Hillside Overlay District Equestrian Overlay Very Low (VL) Residential Single-Family Very Low (VL) District North Residence Residential Hillside Overlay District Equestrian Overlay Very Low (VL) Residential Single-Family Very Low (VL) District South Residence Residential Hillside Overlay District Equestrian Overlay Very Low (VL) Residential Single-Family Very Low (VL) District East Residence Residential Hillside Overlay District Equestrian Overlay Very Low (VL) Residential Single-Family Very Low (VL) District West Residence Residential Hillside Overlay District Equestrian Overlay Project Overview: The applicant is requesting to construct a 6,871 square foot two-story, single- family residence with an attached 840 square foot garage on the project site. The proposed grading includes up to 9 feet of fill which necessitates that the project be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission per Section 17.122.020.G.1.1. Exhibit C DRC COMMENTS HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRCDRC2019-00973- MOLINAR DESIGN, INC. April 6, 2021 Page 2 The proposed residence has a modern Mediterranean style design theme, which includes stone veneer, smooth trowel stucco finish, rafter tails, clay tile roofing, vinyl windows, and aluminum balcony railings. The residence was designed to be compliant with the Hillside Design Guidelines (Section 17.122.020.D.2), including minimizing view obstructions by overbuilding of the site. The building mass is broken up through the use of multiple wall plane changes and the incorporation of exterior decks along the north and south elevation. The proposed 6,874 square foot residence consists of a 3,494 square foot first floor, which includes the main living area, garage, and a guest suite, and a 3,377 square foot second floor which consists of four (4) bedrooms and a laundry room. The first and second floor include decks along the south elevation. The size of the 6,871 square foot residence is in keeping with homes constructed on Carriage Drive within the vicinity of the project site, which range in size from 2,000 square feet to 8,500 square feet. The project complies with the requirements of the Very Low (VL) Residential District as follows: Development Requirements Proposed Front Yard 42' +/- 5' 46'-4" Interior Side Yards 10' / 15' 10' / 15'-9" Rear Yard 60' 60' Lot Coverage 25% max 24% 35' (30' limit within the Hillside 30' Building Height Overlay) The project complies with the intent of the Hillside Overlay District, which seeks to facilitate appropriate development of hillside areas. The site is a downslope lot with an elevation change of approximately 9 feet from the north to the south property lines. The proposed grading design limits earthwork to 500 cubic yards of import, which is necessary to construct the foundation of the residence. The foundation of the residence is stepped with the existing grade, with the pad at an elevation of 2,092 feet, in conformance with Hillside Design Section 17.122.020.D.1.a., to terrace the building to follow the slope. Hillside Design Section 17.122.020.D.1.C. requires that residences in the Hillside Overlay District be designed to fit within a 30-foot high building envelope. The applicant has provided north-south and east-west elevations with building envelopes demonstrating compliance with the 30-foot height requirement. The maximum permitted retaining wall height is 4 feet within the Hillside Overlay District, with stepped retaining walls permitted to have a maximum height of 3 feet with a minimum 3 foot separation between the stepped walls. The applicant is not proposing any retaining walls. If this changes during construction, the applicant is responsible to submit plans to the Planning Department showing that no retaining walls are proposed in excess of 4 feet and a minimum 3- foot separation is between the stepped retaining wall. The project site has existing 6-foot-high perimeter walls along the east, south and west property lines. The existing perimeter walls are DRC COMMENTS HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRCDRC2019-00973- MOLINAR DESIGN, INC. April 6, 2021 Page 3 in keeping with Hillside Design Guideline Sections 17.122.020.E., which requires that the design of walls that integrate the materials and colors used of the residence. The proposed landscaping will be required to comply with Hillside Development Section 17.122.020.F., including the use of drought-tolerant landscaping to protect slopes from erosion and planting shrubs to soften the views of the downslope elevations. The project is within the High Fire Hazard Zone and within a wildland-urban interface area. A landscape plan has not provided at this time. As a Condition of Approval, this plan will be required when grading and construction plans for the project are submitted to the City for plan check. Staff Comments The project conforms with the Development Code and the Hillside Design Standards and Guidelines and provides a grading design that balances the requirement to reduce cut and fill to the greatest extent possible and to reduce the height of the structure to limit view obstructions as seen from the residences to the north. The residence is well-designed and carries the design theme to all elevations, including providing wall plane articulation. The residence is stepped with the existing grade which further reduces the overall bulk as seen from Carriage Drive. Earthwork is limited to 500 cubic yards of export and grading is limited to the area necessary to construct the residence and open deck area to the south of the residence. The proposed design does not require Variances or Minor Exceptions. Major/Secondary Issues: None Staff Recommendation: Staff requests that the Design Review Committee consider the design (building architecture, site planning, etc.) of the proposed project and recommend the selected action below to the Planning Commission: ORecommend approval of the design of the project as proposed by the applicant. ❑Recommend approval with modifications to the design of the project by incorporating revisions requested by the Committee. Follow-up review by the Committee is not required. The revisions shall be verified by staff prior to review and action by the Planning Director / Planning Commission. ❑Recommend conditional approval of the design of the project by incorporating revisions requested by the Committee. Follow-up review by the Committee is not required. The revisions shall be Conditions of Approval and verified by staff during plan check after review and action by the Planning Director/ Planning Commission. ❑Recommend denial of the design of the project as proposed by the applicant. Staff Planner: Mena Abdul-Ahad, Assistant Planner Members Present: Staff Coordinator: Mike Smith, Principal Planner CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: May 12, 2021 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Planning Director INITIATED BY: Mena Abdul-Ahad, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: LOCATED AT 10839 CARRIAGE DRIVE — MOLINAR DESIGN, INC - A request for a Hillside Design Review to consider the construction of a new 6,871 square foot two-story single-family residence with an attached 4-car garage on a 20,724 square foot lot within the Very Low (VL) Residential District within the Hillside Overlay District and Equestrian Overlay District - APN: 1074-531-09; DRC2019-00973. RECOMMENDATION: Approve Design Review DRC2019-00973 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: A request to develop a vacant 20,724 square foot lot with a 6,871 square foot two-story single-family residence with an attached 4-car garage. The modern Mediterranean design is generally compatible with the residential neighborhood in which it is located. The project is in compliance with the development standards for Very Low (VL) Residential District, Hillside Overlay and the Equestrian Overlay. Design Review Committee forwarded the project to Planning Commission without correction on April 6, 2021. Planning commission review is required because an excess of 5 feet of excavation/fill is proposed pursuant to Development Code Section 17.122.020.G.1.i. This item is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA guidelines under CEQA Section 15303 — New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures, which permits the construction of a single-family residence in a residential zone. BACKGROUND: The 20,724 square foot vacant project site is located on the north side of Carriage Drive within the Very Low (VL) Residential District, Hillside Overlay and Equestrian Overlay. The property dimensions are approximately 89 feet along the north property line, 191 feet along the east property line, 127 feet along the south property line, and 197 along the west property line. The downslope lot has an elevation of approximately 220 feet as measured at the curb face along the north property line to the south property line, for a maximum grade change of approximately 9 feet from the north to south property lines. The site is covered in short grasses. PROJECT ANALYSIS: The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning Designations for the project site and adjacent properties are Page 1 of 4 Exhibit D Olt, as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Vacant Land Very Low (VL) Very Low (VL) Residential District' 2 Residential Very Low (VL) Ver Low VL Residential District' 2 North Single-Family Residence Residential y ( ) South Single-Family Residence Very Low (VL) Very Low (VL) Residential District' 2 Residential East Single-Family Residence Very Low (VL) Very Low (VL) Residential District' 2 Residential Very Low (VL) VeryLow VL Residential District' 2 West Single-Family Residence Residential ( ) 1-Hillside Overlay District 2-Equestrian Overlay District A. Project Overview: The applicant is requesting to construct a 6,871 square foot two-story, single-family residence with an attached 840 square foot garage on the project site. The proposed grading includes up to 9 feet of fill which necessitates that the project be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission pursuant to Development Code Section 17.122.020.G.1.1. B. Architectural and Site Design: The proposed residence has a modern Mediterranean style design theme, which includes stone veneer, smooth trowel stucco finish, rafter tails, clay tile roofing, vinyl windows, and aluminum balcony railings. The residence was designed to be compliant with the Hillside Design Guidelines (Development Code Section 17.122.020.D.2). The building mass is broken up through the use of multiple wall plane changes and the incorporation of exterior decks along the north and south elevation. The proposed 6,871 square foot residence consists of a 3,494 square foot first floor, which includes the main living area, garage, and a guest suite, and a 3,377 square foot second floor which consists of four (4) bedrooms and a laundry room. The first and second floor include decks along the south elevation. The size of the 6,871 square foot residence is in keeping with homes constructed on Carriage Drive within the vicinity of the project site, which range in size from 2,000 square feet to 8,500 square feet. C. Very Low(VL) Residential District Compliance: The project complies with the following relevant development standards of the Very Low (VL) Residential District as follows: Development Requirements Proposed Front Yard 42' +/- 5' 464" Interior Side Yards 10' / 15, 10' / 15-9" Rear Yard 60' 60' Lot Coverage 25% max 24% Page 2 of 4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 01 SO_ Building Height 35' (30' limit within the Hillside Overlay) 30' D. Hillside Overlay District Compliance: The project complies with the intent of the Hillside Overlay District, which seeks to facilitate appropriate development of hillside areas. The site is a downslope lot with an elevation change of approximately 9 feet from the north to the south property lines. E. Building Envelope Analysis: Hillside Development Standard Section 17.122.020.D.1.e. requires that residences in the Hillside Overlay be designed to fit within a 30-foot high building envelope. The applicant has provided north-south and east-west elevations with building envelopes demonstrating compliance with the 30-foot height requirement. F. Grading: The proposed grading design limits earthwork to 500 cubic yards of import, which is necessary to construct the foundation of the residence. The foundation of the residence is stepped with the existing grade, with the pad at an elevation of 2,092 feet, in conformance with Hillside Design Section 17.122.020.D.1.a., to terrace the building to follow the slope. G. Retaining walls: The maximum permitted retaining wall height is 4 feet within the Hillside Overlay District, with stepped retaining walls permitted to have a maximum height of 3 feet with a minimum 3-foot separation between the stepped walls. The applicant is not proposing any retaining walls. If changes to the wall plan are found to be necessary during construction, the applicant is responsible to submit plans to the Planning Department showing that no retaining walls are proposed in excess of 4 feet and a minimum 3-foot separation is between the stepped retaining wall. H. Perimeter walls and Fencing: The project site has existing 6-foot-high perimeter walls along the east, south and west property lines. The existing perimeter walls are in keeping with Hillside Design Guideline Sections 17.122.020.E of the Development Code, which requires that the design of walls that integrate the materials and colors used of the residence. I. Landscape: The proposed front yard landscaping is designed to comply with Development Code Section 17.122.020.F., which requires new development to include the use of drought-tolerant landscaping to protect slopes from erosion and planting shrubs to soften the views of the downslope elevations. The proposed front landscaping complies with the front yard landscape requirements, including reducing hardscape to less than 50 percent of the front yard area, at least 25 percent landscape and no more than 25 percent decorative hardscape. The proposed front yard landscaping does not exceed the maximum applied water allowance (MAWA) which meets the criteria of State Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (MWELO) Section 17.82.020. All vegetation shall be designed and installed in accordance to the guidelines from the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (RCFPD) for sites located in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone (VHFHSZ) fire area and is in the designated Wildland-Urban Interface Fire Area. J. Design Review Committee: The project was reviewed by the Design Review Committee (Oaxaca and Williams) on February 16, 2021. Staff presented the project to members of the Design Review Committee and members of the Committee recommended approval as presented. The committee stated that the project was well designed and recommended that the project move forward to the Planning Commission for final review. Page 3 of 4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CEQA DETERMINATION: Planning Staff determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 3 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines under CEQA Section 15303 — New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures, which permits the construction of a single-family residence in a residential zone. Staff finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Director has reviewed staff's determination of exemption, and based on her own independent judgment, concurs with staff's determination of exemption. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing with a regular page legal advertisement in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin on (date) and notices were mailed to all property owners (include how many property owners were notified), within a 660-foot radius of the project site on April 28, 2021. To date, no comments/correspondence has been received in response to these notifications. COUNCIL MISSION /VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: The project fulfills City Council Core Value#7 (Continuous Improvement) by improving the vacant lot with a new high quality single-family residential unit which meets city requirements and guidelines. EXHIBITS: Exhibit A—Aerial Photo Showing Project Location Exhibit B — Plans Exhibit C — Design Review Committee Comments (April 6, 2021) Page 4 of 4 Rancho C camo nga V CEO F � rstSe rvice 130 Anaheim Pl ace � d � ntial , CA - North Ina lnd Empire Rancho Cucamon � Suite lip Ph : 909 - 9g1 . 4 � 3gar CA 9173000 Fax : 909 N% 981 M" 7631 Firstservice RESIDENTIAL January 17 , 2020 i tana Herrera Ba rajas 12548 Carmel Knolls Drive w, Ranch 0 Cucam011g CA 917319 USA RE : Architectural Modification Conditionally Approved 10839 Carriage Drive customer ID # : C U3320 - 0051 --* 02 Dear L*ili2ana Herrera Barajas We are pleased to inform y ou that yo ur plans were cC) nditionally approved on January 15 , 2020 by the Arch Committee ,, Please ensure that you comply with the conditions noted below : • Contingent upon Architect Pete Volbeda corrections ( please see the attached fetter) & City approlll��I��ilal . Thank you for your patience and cooperation . If you have any questions , please refe r to your Communt'Oty Polic ies or contact me at 909 -w981 -4131 or at abriel . Guerrero2@fsresidentiai . com . Thank you . Sincerely, Gabriel Guerrero Community Manager Exhibit E Abdul Ahad, Mena From: Alexander Garcia <asgarinc@outlook.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 4, 2021 4:03 PM To: Abdul Ahad, Mena Subject: Planning Commission Hearing regarding 10839 Carriage Dr Rancho Cucamonga Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed CAUTION:This email is from outside our Corporate network. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Mena Abdul-Ahad, We are residents of Rancho Cucamonga currently residing at 10827 Carriage Drive in Haven View Estates. We received a Notice of Public Hearing regarding the proposal of new construction at 10839 Carriage Dr. We have lived at 10827 Carriage Drive for 17 years, next to the vacant lot. We would like to express the following concerns for the requested Hillside Design Review of 10839 Carriage Dr • Concern that the proposed square footage of 6,871 plus 4 car garage is too large for the size of the lot and location • The proposed two-story design will potentially impede the view from our residence and neighboring residences causing concern for the proposed elevation of the residence. Carriage Drive declines in elevation therefore each house has been designed with an elevation lower than the next residence. This allows for each residence to maintain their views. This standard should be followed with this new construction. • Request neighbor review of proposed setbacks of the property, including location and height of the proposed residence, garage, and walls on the lot. If the residence is constructed too far back on the lot, it will impede our view from our master bedroom and backyard space. Thank you for presenting our concerns to the Planning Commission. Sincerely, Sherie and Alex Garcia 10827 Carriage Dr Alta Loma CA 91737 Exhibit F RESOLUTION NO. 21-36 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2019-00973-SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW OF A 6,871 SQUARE FOOT TWO-STORY SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE WITH AN ATTACHED 4-CAR GARAGE ON A 20,724 SQUARE FOOT LOT WITHIN THE VERY LOW (VL) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, HILLSIDE OVERLAY DISTRICT, AND EQUESTRIAN OVERLAY DISTRCIT AT 10839 CARRIAGE DRIVE;AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF—APN: 1074-531- 09. A. Recitals. 1. Molinar Design, Inc. filed an application for the approval of Hillside Design Review DRC2019-00973, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution,the subject Hillside Design Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 12th day of May 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. On the 26t"day of May 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on May 26, 2021, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The applicant is requesting to construct a 6,871 square foot two-story single-family residence with an attached 4-car garage on a 20,724 square foot lot within the Very Low (VL) Residential District, Hillside Overlay District, and Equestrian Overlay District at 10839 Carriage Drive; and b. The site is bordered by single-family residences to the north, south, east, and west. The surrounding properties are all within the Very Low (VL) Residential District, Hillside Overlay District, and Equestrian Overlay District; and C. The project complies with the requirements of the Very Low(VL) Residential District, Hillside Overlay District and Equestrian Overlay District, including providing a grading design that balances the requirement to reduce cut and fill to the greatest extent possible; and Exhibit G PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-36 HDR DRC2019-00973— MOLINAR DESIGN, INC. MAY 26, 2021 Page 2 d. The design limits earthwork to 500 cubic yards of import,which is necessary to allow the construction of the foundation of the residence. The foundation of the residence is stepped with the existing grade, with the pad at an elevation of 2,092 feet, in conformance with the Hillside Overlay Design Section 17.122.020.D.1.a to terrace the building to follow the slope.The proposed design does not require Variances or Minor Exceptions, and the square footage is compatible with the other residences along Carriage Drive; and e. The residence is in compliance with Hillside Design Section 17.122.020.D.1.e.,which requires that residences in the Hillside Overlay District be designed to fit within a 30-foot high building envelope. The applicant has provided north-south and east-west cross-sections with building envelopes demonstrating compliance with the 30-foot height requirement; and f. Retaining walls are limited to 4 feet in height or less, in keeping with Hillside Development Section 17.122.020.G.1.j. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan.The General Plan Land Use designation of the project site is Very Low (VL) Residential District. The Very Low (VL) Residential designation is intended for the development of detached, low-density residences on individual lots.The General Plan also provides a goal of facilitating sustainable and attractive infill development that complements surrounding neighborhoods. The project is for the development of a single-family residence on an existing residential lot that is complementary to the surrounding neighborhood. b. The proposed use is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. Section 17.36.010 of the Development Code states that the Very Low(VL)Residential District is for the development of single-family residential uses with a minimum lot size of 20,000 square feet and a maximum residential density of 2 units per gross acre. The project site is an existing 20,724 square foot vacant lot that was intended for the development of a single-family residence. C. The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code, including building setback, building height, lot coverage, grading limitations and design. The project complies with the requirements of the Very Low (VL) Residential District, Hillside Overlay District, and Equestrian Overly District. The required front yard setback is 42 feet (plus or minus 5 feet),the required side yard setbacks are 10 and 15 feet and the required rear yard setback is 60 feet. The proposed front yard setback is 46 feet,the side yard setbacks are 10 feet and 15 feet,and the rear yard setback is 60 feet. Lot coverage is 24 percent, well below the maximum permitted lot coverage of 25 percent. The overall building height is 30 feet which is below the maximum permitted height limit within the Hillside Overlay District. d. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The proposed single-family residence is compatible with the existing residences in the surrounding area and is not expected to create a detrimental impact on the existing neighborhood. 4. The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)and the City's CEQA Guidelines. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-36 HDR DRC2019-00973— MOLINAR DESIGN, INC. MAY 26, 2021 Page 3 The project qualifies as a Class 3 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15303, which permits the construction of a single-family residence in a residential zone. The project is for the construction of a single-family residence in a residential zone and there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs in the staff's determination of exemption. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF MAY 2021. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Tony Guglielmo, Chairman ATTEST: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary I, Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed,and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 26'h day of May 2021, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Conditions of Approval RANCHO CUCAMONGA Community Development Department Project#: DRC2019-00973 Project Name: EDR - 2-STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING WITH A 4 CAR GARAGE AND POOL HOU Location: 10839 Carriage DR - 107453109-0000 Project Type: Hillside Development Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. APPROVAL FOR: A 6,871 square foot two-story single-family residence with an attached 4-car garage on a 20,724 square foot lot within the Very Low (VL) Residential District within the Hillside Overlay District and Equestrian Overlay District at 10839 Carriage Drive -APN: 1074-531-09. Standard Conditions of Approval 2. The applicant shall sign the Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval provided by the Planning Department. The signed Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval shall be returned to the Planning Department prior to the submittal of grading/construction plans for plan check, request for a business license, and/or commencement of the approved activity. 3. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 4. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval or Approval Letter, Conditions of Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 5. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption fee in the amount of $50.00. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing or within 5 days of the date of project approval. 6. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 7. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 8. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations. Exhibit H www.CityofRC.us Printed:5/18/2021 Project#: DRC2019-00973 Project Name: EDR - 2-STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING WITH A 4 CAR GARAGE AND POOL HOU Location: 10839 Carriage DR - 107453109-0000 Project Type: Hillside Development Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. All driveway approaches shall be constructed per City Standards and City Policy. 2. Provide HOA approval letter for the work to be done at HOA maintained area. 3. Following Development Impact Fees due prior to the issuance of a building permit. Drainage: Transportation: Library: Animal Center: Police: Park Acquisition In-Lieu/Park Impact: Park Improvement: Park Recreation Center: Standard Conditions of Approval 4. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Drive Appr. Street Trees Sidewalk 5. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. www.CityofRC.us Printed:5/18/2021 Page 2 of 5 Project#: DRC2019-00973 Project Name: EDR - 2-STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING WITH A 4 CAR GARAGE AND POOL HOU Location: 10839 Carriage DR - 107453109-0000 Project Type: Hillside Development Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 6. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch pvc with pull rope or as specified. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. 7. Street improvement plans per City Standards for all private streets shall be provided for review and approval by the City Engineer. Prior to any work being performed on the private streets, fees shall be paid and construction permits shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. 8. All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. 9. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. 10. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. www.CityofRC.us Printed:5/18/2021 Page 3 of 5 Project#: DRC2019-00973 Project Name: EDR - 2-STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING WITH A 4 CAR GARAGE AND POOL HOU Location: 10839 Carriage DR - 107453109-0000 Project Type: Hillside Development Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 11. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit Standard Conditions of Approval 1. The site/project is located in the designated Wildland-Urban Interface Fire Area. Please include this note on the plans. Construction materials and methods and automatic fire sprinkler systems are to be in compliance with Chapter 7A of the California Building Code, Section R337 of the California Residential Code, and Fire District Standard 49-1. This requirement applies to all structures including the pool house and the decks. Landscaping is required to comply with all applicable provisions of Fire District Standard 49-1. Please revise the landscaping accordingly. Fire pits and bowls are required to be fueled exclusively by natural gas or propane. Solid fuel fires are prohibited. Fire District Standard 49-1 has been uploaded to the Documents section. Building and Safety Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. When the Entitlement Review is approved submit complete construction drawings including structural calculations, energy calculations and soils report to Building and Safety for plan review in accordance with the current edition of the CA Building and Fire Codes including all local ordinances and standards which are effective at the time of Plan Check Submittal. The new structures are required to be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers per the CBC and Current RCFPD Ordinance. This project is located in the high fire area designated VHFHSZ and must comply to chapter 7A of the California Building Code as well as Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Standard No. 49-1 for structures and landscape. Where no public sewer is available within 200 feet an onsite wastewater system shall be designed and installed per the Local Agency Management Program Ordinance No. 936. A separate submittal and permit is required for this submittal. www.CityofRC.us Printed:5/18/2021 Page 4 of 5 Project#: DRC2019-00973 Project Name: EDR - 2-STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING WITH A 4 CAR GARAGE AND POOL HOU Location: 10839 Carriage DR - 107453109-0000 Project Type: Hillside Development Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Building and Safety Services Department www.CityofRC.us Printed:5/18/2021 Page 5 of 5 Hillside Design Review Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval for Hillside Design Review DRC2019-00973 I, Erick Molinar, on behalf of the property owners, as the applicant for the above referenced project number, hereby state that I am in agreement with and accept the conditions of approval for DRC2019-00973, for property located at 10839 Carriage Drive; APN: 1074-531-09, Rancho Cucamonga, California, as adopted by the Planning Commission on May 26, 2021 and as listed below and attached. Applicant Signature Date Conditions of Approval 1. The applicant shall sign this Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval prior to the submittal of plans for plan check, request for a business license, and/or commencement of the approved activity indicating agreement with and acceptance of the adopted Conditions of Approval prior to the submittal of grading/construction plans for plan check, request for a business license, and/or commencement of the approved activity. 2. All other conditions of approval related to Hillside Design Review DRC2019-00973. Exhibit I 4*40"�Nam— CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: May 26, 2021 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Planning Director INITIATED BY: Jennifer Nakamura, Management Analyst II SUBJECT: MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA — A request to amend Title 17 (Development Code) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to modify administrative procedures, establish new zoning districts, amend land uses and definitions and create new development standards for industrial development. This item is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines under CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3). This item will be forwarded to City Council for final action. (DRC2021- 00170) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission adopt the draft resolution attached hereto as Exhibit C, recommending that the City Council adopt an ordinance to codify the proposed amendment to Title 17 (Development Code) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to modify administrative procedures, establish new zoning districts, amend land uses and definitions, and create new development standards for industrial development, as shown in Exhibit D to this staff report. BACKGROUND: On November 4, 2020, the City Council adopted Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 976 establishing a moratorium on new industrial building development on properties in all industrial zones within the "Southeast Industrial Quadrant" (SEIQ) of the City and within 500 feet of the public right-of-way of a segment of Foothill Boulevard between Haven Avenue and Milliken Avenue. On December 16, 2020, the City Council extended the Interim Urgency Ordinance to June 30, 2021. This interim ordinance was developed as staff observed an increase in the level of development interest in the SEIQ and along Foothill Boulevard. The SEIQ has been dominated by "legacy" uses and tenants such Ameron (now redeveloped with a set of industrial buildings by Goodman), Commercial Metals Company (CIVIC), and Reliant Energy (NRG/GenOn) on significantly large properties. These uses/tenants have been present since before the City's incorporation in 1977. Similarly, there are multiple smaller properties in the SEIQ developed with, for example, small manufacturing businesses, storage yards, and non-conforming residences. Many of these properties are relatively under-developed, i.e. they are not developed to their maximum potential. Page 1 Overall, there has been limited turnover in the uses/tenants of these properties for new development in the SEIQ. As previously noted, this had been the case until 2019-2020 when interest in developing within the SEIQ began to increase to a level that was not anticipated by the City. This level of interest generally has no parallel elsewhere in the City and planning for it in the SEIQ has been limited. The current Development Code does not adequately address the unique operational impacts, characteristics, and development constraints of modern industrial development. In the case of Foothill Boulevard, the Development Code does not account for industrial development located adjacent to non-industrial development. There are no requirements/regulations that apply to industrial development, in that context, to address, for example, differences in operational characteristics, the type and volume of traffic, performance standards related to noise and glare, and design standards for building size and scale. Along Foothill Boulevard there are three sets of vacant properties that are relatively small, compared to the properties in the SEIQ, with areas ranging between 1.75 and 8.2 acres located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard between Haven Avenue and Milliken Avenue. These properties are surrounded by, for example, offices, retail stores, and restaurants. Near one of these properties is a church and a hotel. In light of these concerns, the Council determined that a strategic pause on industrial development in the SEIQ and along Foothill Boulevard was appropriate and would provide staff time to review our development standards, consider work being done on the General Plan as well as engage the industrial development community to understand their needs and find common ground to ensure a robust, diverse industrial sector which can provide employment and services for local residents and generate positive economic outcomes for the City. The proposed updates will apply uniformly to all industrial zones throughout the City, not just the areas impacted by the moratorium. Since the approval of the interim urgency ordinance, staff has worked with our code consultant, Lisa Wise Consulting, to evaluate all aspects of industrial building development. This included determining the relevant topics and trends related to industrial building development, determining what standards needed updating and review and providing feedback on proposed solutions that meet our need for an economically diverse industrial sector that provides value to the City and its residents while meeting the goals and policies of the current General Plan and the key community values of the General Plan Update: Health, Equity and Stewardship. Staff has also engaged the industrial development community to gather feedback and understanding of the industrial development sector. Staff has conducted outreach with the City's industrial development and brokerage community through our monthly zoom meetings beginning in December 2020 to discuss feasible land use regulations that mitigate impacts caused by industrial development. We have also engaged with interested stakeholders on an individual level for more nuanced conversations. On April 28, 2021, staff presented the public draft of the proposed industrial standards to the Planning Commission for review. The commission asked questions and provided supportive feedback for staff on the draft code changes. Since the Planning Commission hearing we have continued to have conversations with industrial stakeholders who have provided feedback on the proposed amendments. A summary of feedback received and the City's response is provided later in the report. ANALYSIS: As part of this code update process, staff analyzed the existing conditions within all industrial zones and the impacts of existing industrial development throughout the City. The purpose of this evaluation was to determine what current regulations were relevant and effective in ensuring that the City's vision, goals, and policies for industrial development are fulfilled. Many, though not all, of the current regulations have been in place since the 1980's. The comprehensive code amendment in 2012 provided a more streamlined land use table for industrial uses, but most industrial development standards remained in place. The intent of the proposed updates was to revise review procedures where needed, update development standards consistent with current industrial development and eliminate any obsolete land use classifications, development standards, and procedures. Page 2 These amendments will also ensure that the City's requirements/regulations are consistent with current State laws, Building codes, and Fire codes, and compatible with current and anticipated land uses, economic trends, architectural considerations, environmental sustainability, social equity, etc. The updated code will provide clarity for future development by providing clear, updated standards that will be applied to all industrial projects. Below are some of the key policy revisions included in the public draft code amendment for industrial zoned properties: Entitlement Processing. Currently, the only entitlement required for most types of industrial development is a Design Review application. The purpose of the design review application is to evaluate the site plan, development standards and project design. It does not take into account the proposed uses and activities to ensure land use compatibility and to mitigate potential impacts or conflicts that could otherwise result from the proposed use. The proposed amendments require most new industrial buildings and industrial uses to apply for a Conditional Use Permit to consider the relationship of the use or project to the surrounding area and the community as a whole and evaluate the adequacy of services and facilities for the proposed project or use. Most Conditional Use Permits for industrial projects over 75,000 square feet will be heard by the City Council, with a recommendation from the Planning Commission. All other Conditional Use Permits will be heard by the Planning Commission. Smaller, less intensive uses currently subject to our administrative Conditional Use Permit will now be subject to our new Minor Use Permit process which will continue to be reviewed by the Planning Director. For these non-industrial uses, there is functionally little change to the entitlement process other than the name of the entitlement. ApprovingEntitlement Minor Use Permit (formerly administrative CUP) Planning Director Conditional Use Permit Planning Commission Conditional Use Permit(Industrial Uses over 75,000 sq. ft.) City Council (with PC recommendation) Larger industrial buildings are in high demand and can be used for a variety of warehousing and distribution uses, each with differing levels of infrastructure needed to support the type of use being targeted for the site. This provides a challenge for planners to develop standards that can be applied uniformly to all industrial development projects. To allow for some flexibility and individualized review of projects, the Master Plan process (Section 17.22.020) allows for flexibility for developments beyond conventional zoning regulations to address special or unique needs or characteristics. All new industrial buildings over 450,000 square feet will be required to submit for a Master Plan to "plan ahead" and solve any circulation, drainage and neighborhood compatibility problems that may arise from the development. The approving authority for the Master Plan process will be the City Council, with a recommendation from the Planning Commission. In addition, staff is proposing the creation of an overlay zone for large warehouses (Large Warehouse Overlay Zone) to ensure that large warehouses are located in areas of the city with adequate public infrastructure and away from sensitive receptors who may be impacted by emissions, noise and other impacts generated by the predominant uses in such buildings. New developments with buildings over 450,000 square feet will be required to apply for inclusion in the Large Warehouse Overlay Zone. This means that an applicant seeking to develop a large warehouse of 450,000 square feet or more would apply for a zoning map amendment to apply the overlay to their project site. Zoning Districts. The amendments include revisions to the current four industrial zoning districts - Industrial Park (IP), General Industrial (GI), Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial (MI/HI) and Heavy industrial (HI). Industrial Park will remain,with GI, MI/HI and HI consolidating into two new zones: Neo Industrial (NI)and Industrial Employment (IE), consistent with the draft General Plan. Page 3 Current Zoning Designation New Zoning Designation Industrial Park IP Industrial Park IP General Industrial (GI) Neo Industrial (NI) Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial (MI/HI) Industrial Employment (IE) Heavy Industrial HI Industrial Employment IE The intent is to continue to permit existing light and general industrial uses while shifting away from heavier industrial uses that generate significant noise, air quality and odor impacts due to their need for open air storage and processing of materials to a broad range of similar clean industrial practices and processes that typically take place indoors. Neo-Industrial (NI) supports a complementary mix of uses such as, research and development, light and custom manufacturing, engineering and design services, breweries, and maker spaces, as well as accessory office, retail and limited residential uses to compliment the primary use; supportive amenities and services; and convenient transit access. This zoning district encourages light industrial activities with low environmental impacts and supports the growth of creative industries, incubator businesses, and innovative design and manufacturing. The zoning district is not intended for conventional industrial business such as warehousing, distribution/fulfillment centers, and manufacturing. Industrial Employment (IE) designates areas reserved for manufacturing, warehousing and storage, e- commerce distribution, light industrial research parks, automobile and vehicle services, and a broad range of similar clean industrial practices and processes that typically generate more impacts than would be compatible with office and residential uses. This industrial employment district prohibits non-industrial uses, except for accessory office and commercial uses (such as restaurants or convenience stores) that support the employees of the primary industrial use, and on-site caretaker units. Allowed Land Uses and Definitions. To support the new entitlement procedures and zoning designations, adjustments were needed to the land use table and land use definitions. Less intensive uses that still need review for compatibility with the surrounding uses, such as service-oriented uses in an industrial district will be subject to the Minor Use Permit (Director approval) with other conditionally permitted uses, such as a lumber yard, will be subject to the Conditional Use Permit process (PC or CC approval). Older industrial land uses that are typically generators of noise, air quality or odor impacts, or are not job supporting uses were deleted, new industrial land uses were added, and some industrial land use definitions were updated to reflect changes in the patterns and intensities of industrial development. Development Standards. Minor changes to the existing development standards are proposed to provide additional flexibility in the development envelope to respond to new market trends and help manage impacts of industrial development. In addition, the number of parking lot trees was reduced to provide better truck access with less tree damage. For larger industrial buildings, a larger tree size is now required to better match the scale of the building and provide better screening right away, rather than waiting for smaller trees to grow and mature. Development Standard Current Proposed Floor Area Ratio GI — 50% - 60% Neo Industrial —40% - 60% MI/HI — None Industrial Employment—40% - 60% HI —40% - 50% Industrial Employment—40% - 60% Building Height 75 feet max None* Parking Lot Trees 1 per 3 parking stalls 1per 5 parkingstalls Tree size 15 al/25% 24-inch box 24-inch box/25%36-inch box over 200,000 s .ft. 'Height limits may apply for parcels within the Ontario Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan Page 4 In addition to these development standards, additional design standards were amended or added to the code. These include building and parking siting to place the most aesthetically pleasing areas of the site nearest to the public right of way, development of pedestrian connections, public street and intersection standards to ensure adequate transportation infrastructure to reduce potential traffic impacts and provide public safety access. Parking. Developing parking standards that apply to all industrial projects is challenging and is unlikely to yield the best results for many projects. Industrial uses can be quite varied and the specific type of industrial use will typically drive the parking needed for a development. Many industrial buildings are developed for a speculative user, rather than built with a tenant or use already committed to the site, creating additional parking uncertainty. Our code consultant researched cities across the country with similar industrial bases to see if there were any consistent parking standards for industrial buildings that we could emulate, but standards vary widely with no common thread between them. To address concerns about truck queuing and to avoid trucks queuing on City streets or within street medians, we have added standards requiring trailer parking in loading bays and space for onsite queuing of trucks at a ratio of 1 queuing space for each dock door. Larger projects will be required to submit a parking management plan which requires new development to plan for future parking onsite based on the use of the building to minimize traffic, manage on-site circulation and effectively allocate parking needs for the site. To provide some flexibility for speculative industrial buildings, a land banking provision has been added to the code that allows land on site to be set aside for future parking that may not be needed until a tenant is selected for the building. Then the set aside land can be developed for parking as needed for the tenant. Sustainability. New industrial buildings will be required to install a solar collector system designed to generate a minimum of 75% of anticipated electricity demand. This can be achieved through roof mounted solar infrastructure, solar canopies in parking lots or a combination of the two. In addition, standards for the installation of electric vehicle parking and charging stations are included for new developments in the Neo-Industrial and Industrial Employment districts to foster the city's commitment to the stewardship of our resources. Stakeholder Feedback. Since the release of the public draft code amendments, we have had several meetings and conversations with stakeholders about the standards. Exhibits A and B contain the written comments received regarding the draft code standards. Overall, the stakeholders appreciated the flexibility provided through the master plan process and provided suggestions for changes based on their experience. They also asked clarifying questions regarding specific language provisions in the code. A summary of the key areas of discussion are listed below. 1. Master Plan Threshold. It was suggested that minimum square footage threshold for the master plan requirement be increased from 400,000 to 450,000 based on typical building sizing levels within the industrial users. That change has been made and incorporated into the revised code amendment. 2. Truck Queuing. Concerns were raised with regard to the need for a 1:1 ratio between dock doors and truck queuing. Developers felt that number was too high. Examples were provided of other industrial tenants who required far less on-site queuing, but the stakeholder groups were unable to provide a different truck queuing standard or any methodology for staff to consider. Staff recommends leaving the standard as proposed. The code (17.64.060.C) however, allows for reductions in required parking with the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. If continued conversations with the stakeholder group yield new information that has supports a change to the truck queuing standards, they may be updated prior to the City Council hearing on this item. 3. Block Network Standards. The design standards for additional roadway infrastructure were of particular concern in our conversations with the stakeholders. We have shown through our traffic analysis of the SEIQ that failure to require appropriate infrastructure will prove devastating to the roadways and intersections within that area of the city. However, the master plan process allows some flexibility in the nature and design of the future road networks as long as doing so will not cause a significant impact on public health, safety or welfare. Page 5 4. Solar Infrastructure. Clarification was requested on the solar infrastructure requirements. There were concerns about the required roof coverage as well as required solar shade structures. This was an error in writing the code. The code was rewritten to allow the electrical demand supplied by solar be provided on the roof or solar shade structures in the parking lot or a combination of the two. Findings of Fact. Per Section 17.22.040 of the Development Code, amendments to the code may be approved only when the City Council finds that the Development Code amendment is consistent with the General Plan goals, policies, and implementation programs. General Plan Policy LU-3.3 recognizes the need for regional serving land uses, like industrial uses need immediate access to the regional transportation network that is designed to provide maximum access capabilities and permit maximum dispersal of traffic. General Plan Land Use Goal CM-5 and Policy CM-5.2 require new developments to evaluate and when needed provide necessary transportation infrastructure to mitigate for transportation impacts. General Plan Land Use Goal CM-7 supports the maintenance of an efficient and safe network of good and freight movement that supports the needs of the business community. The block networks standards proposed provide guidance to new development with some flexibility with the master plan process to develop a transportation network that will not only support individual development, but provide efficient, safe transportation infrastructure for a variety of industrial uses. Finally, General Plan Land Use Policy LU-3.4 promotes development that is sustainable in its use of land and limits impacts to natural resources, energy, and air and water quality. Solar power generation standards and EV charging stations and infrastructure help encourage clean energy use and help reduce environmental impacts related to industrial development. Environmental Analysis. The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. This project qualifies under the general rule that CEQA only applies to project, which have the potential for causing significant effect on the environment. Pursuant to State CEQA guidelines Section 15061(13)(3), where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. The consolidation of zoning districts, changes to the entitlement process and the elimination of higher impact industrial uses from the land use table will impose greater limitations on industrial development than exist today and will thereby serve to eliminate potentially significant adverse environmental impacts. The implementation of requirements for solar collector systems for new industrial development will provide a renewable electric resource for the development and reduce dependence on non-renewable electric resources. Requiring development electric vehicle charging infrastructure will encourage use of electric vehicles for industrial uses, reducing GHG emissions in future developments. These requirements impose greater limitations on industrial development than exist today and will thereby serve to eliminate potentially significant adverse environmental impacts. Each of these components, individually and cumulatively, does not result in the possibility of creating significant to cumulative effects on the environment. Future development subject to these provisions will be reviewed for CEQA compliance under separate entitlements or actions as proposed by these code updates. During the entitlement process, the applicant will be required to comply with CEQA. In reviewing each project for compliance with CEQA, an applicant may be required to submit environmental studies that analyze potential impacts such as air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, noise levels, and transportation/traffic caused by the site-specific project. On a case-by-case review of each project, the appropriate environmental document will be prepared to address project-specific impacts. Page 6 Based on this evidence and all the evidence in the record Planning staff has determined that the Amendment will not have a significant effect on the environment and is therefore exempt from further environmental review under CEQA. FISCAL IMPACT: Developing a robust industrial sector with well planned developments with a sufficient diversity of uses and appropriate controls will prevent fiscal strains on our tax base and infrastructure costs over the long term. COUNCIL MISSION /VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: This code update directly addresses the Council's vision to build on our success as a world class community by implanting new development standards that will enhance the overall quality and performance of our industrial sector. Through the engagement of stakeholders and learning more about industrial development, and using the information provided by our stakeholders to guide our decisions on the code updates, we are guided by the Council's core values of intentionally embracing and anticipating the future, working together cooperatively and respectfully with each other, staff and all stakeholders, and intentionally embracing and anticipating the future. EXHIBITS: Exhibit A— Comment letter from industrial stakeholders received May 10, 2021 Exhibit B — Comment letter from NAIOP received May 10, 2021 Exhibit C — Resolution of Approval 21-37 of Municipal Code Amendment DRC2021-00170 Exhibit D — Draft Industrial Code Amendments, May 2021 Page 7 DRAFT CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMENTS/ SUGGESTIONS TO PROPOSED INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Following are our initial comments and suggestions regarding the proposed Industrial Development Standards applicable to the Southeast Industrial Quadrant: 1. Building Height and FAR. We believe that removal of limitations on building height and increase in floor area ratios are positive steps. Regarding building height limitations, the development/end user community understands that there may be additional constraints based on proximity to Ontario International Airport. 2. 450,000 Square Feet Master Plan Threshold. We believe that the line of demarcation between projects not required to prepare a Master Plan and projects required to prepare a Master Plan should be 450,000 square feet, rather than 400,000 square feet. For the reasons we discussed, 450,000 square feet is a more logical line of demarcation. 3. Master Plan Flexibility. We believe that the development/end user community will accept the requirement of a Master Plan for projects in excess of 450,000 square feet, provided that the Master Plan process provides an avenue to deviate from the general development standards with satisfactory alternative standards. Because each user will have particular needs (i.e., reducing building sizes to allow more trailer storage spaces, in order to reduce trips to remote storage facilities), more passenger car parking spaces (depending on the nature of the operation) and less landscape coverage (i.e., to accommodate parking lot solar and EV charging facilities), flexibility is the best way to attract desirable users to the City. Inflexibility regarding street frontages on three sides of each building would be problematic, because it would constrain the placement of loading docks. Block network parameters and proximity of streets to railroad lines would similarly constrain site planning (i.e., the utility of a site adjacent to a railroad track would be diminished by an inflexible requirement for a street parallel to the track). Nevertheless, the development/end user community understands that it is appropriate for them to have the burden of proving to the City that each alternative industrial development standard is justified based on technical analysis. Requirements for vehicle parking, truck parking, trailer storage and onsite circulation should be determined using a Parking Demand Management Plan that is prepared in connection with each Master Plan. This requirement will promote parking strategies that are tailored to the user, with a focus on avoidance of truck queuing and the storage of trucks and trailers on City streets. This requirement will also promote designs that will be conducive to the safety of the occupants of the site once the user is identified (in relationship to shift changes and other events). Exhibit A I C1311-000--4077444.1 DRAFT As we discussed, end users are often not identified until the project is entitled or even in the early phases of construction. Accordingly, we suggest that the Master Plan process include an administrative minor revision process, so the requirements of the user can be accommodated in an efficient manner once the user has been identified. If the conditional use permit that is brought forward with the Master Plan contains the same flexibility, the development/end user community will accept it. 4. Alternative Enemy. While the development/end user community will accept mandatory renewable energy requirements (i.e., solar, EV charging, etc.), it should be recognized that these requirements are established by the end users and not the developers. End users have dramatically diverse energy demands needs. Accordingly, we suggest that a goal for energy offset be established, with the means of offset being left to either the developer or the end user. In that regard, we have seen the following language adopted in other jurisdictions: "Projects will be required to offset their energy demand by at least percent through the provision of renewable energy. The energy demand shall be determined at the initial building permit stage, if the end user is known at that time. If the end user is not known at that time, this condition should be deferred to the tenant improvement building permit and to subsequent tenant improvement permits as the end user changes. Utilizing the energy demand calculated, the appropriate amount of renewable energy must be included with the related building permits. Related to the initial building permit, the roof must be designed to accommodate rooftop mounted solar panels, whether or not solar panels are utilized to offset the energy demand." 5. Data Needs. Similar to alternative energy, data needs are established by the end users and not the developers. Accordingly, we suggest that each project include the conduit sufficient to accommodate the needs of a variety of end users. 6. Corridors. We discussed the need for an east-west corridor and a north-south corridor. These corridors will be expensive and will take significant time to plan and execute, due to conflicts with railroad facilities, utility-owned land and recently developed land. As you know, railroads and utility providers have the power of condemnation, which will impede the acquisition of the necessary right-of-way. We suggest that planning for these corridors start immediately and that the effort be supported by a community facilities district which includes land within the Southeast Industrial Quadrant, as well as within other areas that benefit from the corridors and that a bond be sized and issued that would cover the cost of construction. 2 C1311-000--4077444.1 DRAFT We also suggest that pending projects be allowed to proceed before the corridors are executed, subject to the projects demonstrating through the California Environmental Quality Act process that their traffic impacts can be acceptably mitigated. Otherwise, development(along with the corresponding economic benefits to the City and others) will be delayed and the current market cycle will be missed. 7. Wear and Tear on Roadways. In previous conversations, we discussed wear and tear on City roadways caused by truck usage. We suggest that a city-wide maintenance community facilities district be organized to cover that cost on a permanent basis. We also suggest that maintenance cost be carefully considered before additional streets are planned. 3 C1311-000--4077444.1 SEIQ Meeting - Proposed Agenda 1. Discussion of High-Level Objectives (City and Development Community) 2. Discussion of Master Plan Process 3. Discussion of SCAMD's Rule's 2305 (passed May 7, 2021) a. WAIRE — Warehouse Actions and Investments to Reduce Emissions (WAIRE) Program is a flexible points system to encourage environmentally friendly practices. Large warehouses would be required to accrue a certain number of points, based on annual truck trips to and from that facility. Points could be earned through emissions-curbing actions, or the warehouse could instead pay a fee. 4. Discussion of Potential Revisions to Draft Development Standards (examples below) 5. Discussion of Street Network Challenges and Solutions 6. Next Steps VARIANCE FROM DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Mun. Code,§17.14.060;Table 17.14.060-1,Note 2 (2) A variance from a development standard in the industrial zoning districts requires approval by the city council, except as approved as part of the master plan process set forth in Municipal Code sections 17.22.020,et seq. BLOCK NETWORK PARAMETERS Mun. Code, §17.36.040(D)(9)(a)(ii) 9. Design standards. The following design standards apply to all new developments in the Neo- Industrial(NI) and Industrial Employment(IE) Zoning Districts: ii. Block Network Parameters for Public Streets. • Intersection spacing along arterial edges shall be between 1/8 mile and 1/4 mile with at least one mid-block intersection between intersecting arterials and rail, flood control, utility or freeway corridors. • Intersection spacing inside arterial/arterial blocks bounded by arterials shall be a minimum of 200 feet and a maximum of 1,320 feet. • Buildings greater than 400,000 sq. ft.in size shall have public streets on at least 3 sides. • A minimum of 1 public street shall run parallel with and within 500 feet of rail (excluding spurs), flood control, utility, or freeway corridors. The parallel street shall run through the block. Street crossings at intersecting corridors shall be established on a case-by-case basis based on feasibility and needs by the City Engineer. • Intersections along arterials shall be aligned with existing/proposed intersections on the opposite side of the arterial where possible and meet minimum design standards for offsets or clearance from adjacent corridors as required by the City Engineer. • Two distinct points of connection shall be provided through an internal block network to the arterial street network for every industrial parcel. • Alterations or deviations from the foregoing standards may be approved by the City Council as part of the master plan process for industrial buildings larger than 400,000 square feet in gross floor area set forth in Municipal Code sections 17.22.020, et seq. The additional language in red font above acknowledges the City's flexibility to consider deviations from the otherwise strict street network parameters required under the new Development Code Update as part of the holistic master plan process. This will ensure the City's continuing ability and authority to prioritize street access for public safety and circulation and mitigation of traffic impacts from new industrial projects on both a project- level and area-level basis while also providing industrial developers, in collaboration with City staff and subject to ultimate City Council approval a mechanism to obtain relief from some of these standards as related to a particular project. SOLAR COLLECTOR SYSTEM AND SHADE STRUCTURE PARKING REQUIREMENTS Mun. Code,§17.76.020(B) In the Neo-Industrial (NI) and Industrial Employment (IE) Zoning Districts a solar collector system for the purposes of generating a minimum of 75 percent of the anticipated electricity demand for the use and a minimum of 75 percent of the demand for heating water must be provided on all new industrial developments. If roof mounted, the solar systems must cover a minimum of 80 percent of the roof area of all buildings and structures and be designed to be within 22.5 degrees east or west of true south to ensure maximum efficiency for the solar energy system. Solar collectors may also be installed on support structures that provide shade over parking areas (See section 17.56.060.N.1.b (Exceptions for solar collectors)). The requirement for 80 percent solar coverage of roof area for all new industrial projects is not feasible due to fundamental site constraints and is greater than necessary to provide even 100 percent electrical demand for a proposed industrial building; however, stakeholders support incorporating some form of renewable requirement for new projects. Mun. Code,§17.36.040(1))(9)(a)(iiI) Surface parking stalls for employees and guests shall incorporate shade structures that are capable of supporting solar/photovoltaic array systems with a minimum clearance height of 12 feet.A minimum of 50 percent of the required parking stalls shall include these shade structures for this purpose. The requirement for shade structures that can support solar array systems for fifty percent (50%) of parking stalls for all new industrial projects is not feasible; however, stakeholders support incorporating some form of solar capability for parking shade structures. Mun. Code,§17.36.040 8.c The visibility of any equipment from the public right-of-way shall be determined by"line-of sight" and measured from a point that is 6 feet above the finished surface of the centerline of the adjacent public right-of-way,e.g. street. 9.a.i Sites shall have internal sidewalks where possible that connect to sidewalks along public streets to create pedestrian connections. a.iii Surface parking stalls for employees and guests shall incorporate shade structures where possible that are capable of supporting solar/photovoltaic array systems with a minimum clearance height of 12 feet. A minimum of 25 percent of the required parking stalls shall include these shade structures for this purpose or a 50 percentage shading through landscaping with equal solar photovoltaic on the roof b. iv For office portions of principle buildings,window and door openings must comprise at least 60 percent of the total area of exterior walls facing a public street of the defined office wall area. Additional Solar Comments: Net Metered Interconnection - the electrical generation is consumed on site, so future tenant(s) would be the offtaker. Grid Offtake - electricity would be sold into the wholesale market A typical industrial building would only justify a -2.2 MW system, which would only use <15% of the roof. • We've historically thought of warehouse space to utilize around 3.5kWh/sq ft annually. This number may actually be high, given the required volume of natural daylighting required in CA, and also with the lower lighting power density required using LED fixtures. I can dig deeper here, but assuming 3.5kWh/sq ft, this warehouse would utilize -3,500,OOOkWh per year. o Assuming an annual yield of 1,600kWh/kW-DC installed, this would require a 2,188kW-DC (or 2.188MW-DC)PV system to meet 100% of the annual demand. o Using a conventionally racked rooftop mounting system, we're averaging around 15watts-DC/sq ft for rooftop construction. Using this number, we'd need 145,866 sq ft of rooftop to achieve this system size. 145,866/1,028,994 = 14.17% of the roof Regarding the system orientation, a system facing more East/West rather than South will make better economic sense for not just the solar developer/owner, but also to the grid as a whole. This would generate more kWh in the early/later hours, as compared to maximizing peak production at twelve noon, which exacerbates the "duck curve" overproduction issue that California is experiencing. PV generation is actually being curtailed in California as a result of the due South orientation of legacy PV systems. While it is true that systems oriented to the South will produce the most energy, East-West systems are often deployed to provide for a smoother production curve, which can be beneficial to not only the end use, but to the utility. Solar modules attached directly to carport "decks" are less efficient due to the heat from the back of modules. TRAILER STORAGE AND LOADING REQUIREMENTS FOR INDUSTRIAL USES Mun. Code,§17.64.100(C) Required loading spaces for industrial uses. Except as approved by the City Council as part of the master plan process for industrial buildings larger than 400,000 square feet in gross floor area, all industrial uses shall provide a minimum of one loading space per proposed loading bay. For each loading bay proposed, a minimum of one on-site truck queuing space must be provided. Each on-site truck queuing space shall be a minimum of nine feet in width and 65 feet in length and shall be included on the circulation management plan if required by the approving authority. The truck queuing spaces shall be grouped together in a designated area with clear access to loading bays." (Mun. Code, § 17.64.100(C).) The requirement for one loading space per proposed loading bay for all new industrial projects is not feasible due to fundamental site constraints and does not support how modern industrial buildings function from an operational standpoint. In lieu of this requirement, stakeholders propose the addition of language providing for the reduction/relaxation of this standard as part of the City's master plan process for large-scale industrial buildings (see red font above). The City should identify specific uses that generate extraordinary tractor trailer volume such as cold storage facilities and fulfillment centers. These facilities should demonstrate the required trailer parking spaces and truck queuing. These industrial users typically purchase adjoining or nearby parcels to provide the necessary trailer parking. To require all industrial buildings to comply with the worst case scenario is not economically feasible. Mun. Code,§17.64.100(D)(4) Trailer parking required. Except as approved by the City Council as part of the master plan process for industrial buildings larger than 400,000 square feet in gross floor area, one parking space of parking for a trailer is required for each loading dock door. The minimum dimensions of a single trailer parking space is 50 feet in length, 14 feet in width, and 14 feet in vertical clearance. Trailer parking spaces shall be located in a designated area located away from the loading bays and paths of travel. All trailer parking areas must be screened according to the provisions of section 17.48.050 (Requirements by land use type) for industrial areas. The requirement for one trailer parking space per proposed loading dock door for all new industrial projects is not feasible due to fundamental site constraints and does not support how modern industrial buildings function from an operational standpoint. In lieu of this requirement, stakeholders propose the addition of language providing for the reduction/relaxation of this standard as part of the City's master plan process for large-scale industrial buildings (see red font above). Mun. Code,§17.64.120(D) Electric vehicles in Industrial Zoning Districts. Except as approved by the City Council as part of the master plan process for industrial buildings larger than 400,000 square feet in gross floor area, a minimum of 10 percent of required parking in all new developments within the Industrial Zoning Districts for employees and guests shall be reserved for electric vehicles.... One charging station shall be installed for every two spaces dedicated to electric vehicles. Additionally, charging stations for electric powered trucks may be required as determined by the approving authority." The requirement for a minimum of 10 percent of parking for all new industrial projects to be reserved for electric vehicles and one charging station for every two electric vehicle stalls is not feasible due to fundamental site constraints and does not support how modern industrial buildings function from an operational standpoint. In lieu of this requirement, stakeholders propose the addition of language providing for the reduction/relaxation of this standard as part of the City's master plan process for large-scale industrial buildings (see red font above). The Green Building Code already provides stringent standards for EV parking and charging. SPECIAL PARKING LOT LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS Mun. Code,§17.56.060(N)(1) Parking lot landscape. Parking lot landscape includes perimeter planters, abutting parking lots and drive aisles, tree planting for parking lot shade, and a combination of continuous planting strips, planting fingers, and parking islands throughout the parking lot. Parking lot landscape requirements applicable to commercial, industrial, mixed-use, and multi-family residential parking lots with five or more spaces are listed below: 1. Number of trees required. Trees shall be required at a rate of one tree for every three parking stalls. At maturity, trees should reach a minimum height and spread of 40 feet so as to form a shade canopy over parking stalls. Smaller ornamental trees may not be used to satisfy this requirement.The minimum width for planters containing a parking lot tree is six feet. Tree selections shall be approved by the planning director. a. Number of trees required in industrial zoning districts. Except as approved by the City Council as part of the master plan process for industrial buildings larger than 400,000 square feet in gross floor area, trees shall be required at a rate of one tree for every five parking stalls within a planter area that is a minimum of 10 feet in width. Tree clusters may be used subject to approval by the approving authority. b. Exception for solar collectors. Except as approved by the City Council as part of the master plan process for industrial buildings larger than 400,000 square feet in gross floor area, the minimum requirement for trees and shrubs in Industrial Zoning Districts shall be waived for the portion of a parking area over which photo-voltaic solar collectors are installed where they also function as shade structures. The requirement for one tree for very five parking stalls for all new industrial projects is not feasible. In lieu of this requirement, stakeholders propose alternative language providing for the reduction/relaxation of this standard as part of the City's master plan process for large-scale industrial buildings (see red font above). RESOLUTION NO. 21-37 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT DRC2021-00170 TO MODIFY ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES, AMEND LAND USES AND DEFINITIONS AND CREATE 'NEW DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF A. Recitals. 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared Municipal Cade Amendment DRC2021- 001.70, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Municipal Code Amendment is referred to as"the Application". 2. On May 26, 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is 'hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A of this Resolution, are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to the Planning Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on May 26, 2021, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The City Council adopted an Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 976, establishing a moratorium on new industrial building development on properties in all industrial zones within the "Southeast Industrial Quadrant" (SEIQ) of the City and within 500 feet of the public right-of-way of a segment of Foothill Boulevard between Haven Avenue and Milliken Avenue. On December 16, 2020, the City Council,extended the Interim Urgency Ordinance to June30, 2021; b. This interim ordinance was developed as staff observed an increase in the level of development interest in the SEIQ and along Foothill Boulevard. The SEIQ has been dominated by "legacy" uses and tenants on significantly large properties with limited infrastructure.,These uses/tenants have been present since before the City's incorporation in 1977. Similarly, there are multiple smaller properties in the SEIQ developed with, for example, small manufacturing businesses, storage yards, and non-conforming residences. Many of these properties are relatively under-developed, i.e. they are not developed to their maximum potential; C. The Council determined that a strategic pause on industrial development in the SEIQ and along Foothill Boulevard was appropriate and would,provide staff time to review our development standards, consider work being done on the General Plan as well as engage the Exhibit C PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-37 MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT DRC2021-00170—CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA May 26, 2021 Page 2 industrial development community to understand their needs and find common ground to ensure a robust, diverse industrial sector which can provide employment and services for local residents and generate positive economic outcomes for the City; d. The proposed updates will apply uniformly to all industrial zones throughout the City, not just the areas impacted by the moratorium; e. The City prepared a set of amendments (the "Amendments"), which is included as Attachment A to this Resolution and is hereby incorporated by this reference as if set forth in full; f. Development Code Amendment DRC2021-00170 conforms to and does not conflict with the General Plan, including without limitation, the Land Use Element thereof, and will provide for development in a manner consistent with the General Plan; and 3. The Planning Department staff has determined that the project is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies under the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects, which have the potential for causing significant effect on the environment. Pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(B)(3), where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. The consolidation of zoning districts, changes to the entitlement process and the elimination of higher impact industrial uses from the land use table will impose greater limitations on industrial development than exist today and will thereby serve to eliminate potentially significant adverse environmental impacts. The implementation of requirements for solar collector systems for new industrial development will provide a renewable electric resource for the development and reduce dependence on non-renewable electric resources. Requiring development electric vehicle charging infrastructure will encourage use of electric vehicles for industrial uses, reducing GHG emissions in future developments. These requirements impose greater limitations on industrial development than exist today and will thereby serve to eliminate potentially significant adverse environmental impacts. Each of these components, individually and cumulatively, does not result in the possibility of creating significant to cumulative effects on the environment. Future development subject to these provisions will be reviewed for CEQA compliance under separate entitlements or actions as proposed by these code updates. During the entitlement process, the applicant will be required to comply with CEQA. In reviewing each project for compliance with CEQA, an applicant may be required to submit environmental studies that analyze potential impacts such as air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, noise levels, and transportation/traffic caused by the site-specific project. On a case-by-case review of each project, the appropriate environmental document will be prepared to address project-specific impacts. Based on this evidence and all the evidence in the record, the Planning Commission concurs with the Planning Department staffs determination that the Amendment will not have a significant effect on the environment and is therefore exempt from further environmental review under CEQA. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve Municipal Code Amendment DRC2021-00170 as indicated in Attachment A incorporated herein by this reference. 5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2021-37 MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT DRC2021-00170—CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA May 26, 2021 Page 3 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF MAY 2021. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Tony Guglielmo, Chairman ATTEST: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary I, Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 26'h day of May 2021, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 ARTICLE II. LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT PROCEDURES Chapter 17.14 GENERAL APPLICATION PROCESSING PROCEDURES Sections: 17.14.010 Purpose. 17.14.020 Application and fee. 17.14.030 Determination of completeness. 17.14.040 Application review and report. 17.14.050 Public hearing and public notice. 17.14.060 Approving authority. 17.14.070 Appeals. 17.14.080 Effective date. 17.14.090 Permit time limits, extensions, and expiration. 17.14.100 Modification. 17.14.110 Revocation. 17.14.120 Reapplications. 17.14.050 Public hearing and public notice. A. Public hearing required. The following procedures shall govern the notice and public hearing, where required pursuant to this title. The designated approving authority shall hold a public hearing to consider all applications for conditional use permits, variances, major design review, tentative subdivision maps, planned communities, specific plans, zoning code/map amendments, prezoning, development agreements, and general plan amendments considered by the planning commission or city council. B. Notice of hearing. Pursuant to Government Code §§ 65090 to 65094, not less than ten days before the scheduled date of a hearing, public notice shall be given of such hearing in the manner listed below. The notice shall state the date, time, and place of hearing, identify the hearing body, and provide a general description of the matter to be considered and the real property which is the subject of the hearing. 1. Notice of public hearing shall be published in at least one newspaper of general circulation in the city. 2. Except as otherwise provided herein, notice of the public hearing shall be mailed, postage prepaid, to the owners of property within a radius of 660 feet of the exterior boundaries of the property involved in the application, using for this purpose the last known name and address of such owners as shown upon the current tax assessor's records. The radius may be increased as determined to be necessary and desirable by the planning director based on the nature of the proposed project. If the number of owners exceeds 1,000, the city may, in lieu of mailed notice, provide notice by placing notice of at least one-eighth page in one newspaper of general circulation within the city. 3. Notice of the public hearing shall be mailed, postage prepaid, to the owner of the subject real property or the owner's authorized agent and to each local agency expected to provide water, sewerage, streets, roads, schools, or other essential facilities or services to the proposed project. 1 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 4. Notice of the public hearing shall be posted on the project site not more than 300 feet apart along the project perimeter fronting on improved public streets. 5. Notice of the public hearing shall be posted at city hall. 6. Notice of the public hearing shall be mailed to any person who has filed a written request for notice. 7. In addition to the notice required by this section, the city may give notice of the hearing in any other manner it deems necessary or desirable. 17.14.060 Approving authority. A. Designated approving authority. The approving authority as designated in Table 17.14.060-1 (Approving Authority for Land Use Entitlements) shall approve, conditionally approve, or deny the proposed land use or development permit or entitlement in accordance with the requirements of this title. Table 17.14.060-1 (Approving Authority for Land Use Entitlements) identifies recommending (R) and final (F) authorities for each permit or entitlement. In acting on a permit, the approving authority shall make all required findings. An action of the approving authority may be appealed pursuant to procedures set forth in section 17.14.070 (Appeals). B. Multiple entitlements. When a proposed project requires more than one permit with more than one approving authority, all project permits shall be processed concurrently and final action shall be taken by the highest-level designated approving authority for all such requested permits. Projects that require legislative approvals (e.g., zoning code/map amendment, general plan Amendment) may go to the city council as stand-alone items with the associated quasi-judicial approvals stopping at planning commission. C. Referral to the planning commission. At any point in the application review process, the planning director may transfer decision making authority to the planning commission at his/her discretion because of policy implications, unique or unusual circumstances, or the magnitude of the project. Decisions referred to the planning commission shall be considered a�at a noticed public hearing. A referral to another decision-maker is not an appeal and requires no appeal application or fee. 2 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 TABLE 17.14.060-1 APPROVING AUTHORITY FOR LAND USE ENTITLEMENTS Type of Permit or Decision Designated Approving Authority"R"_ "Recommending Body""F"_ "Final Decision-Making Body" Planning Historic Planning Director Preservation Commission City Council Commission Official code interpretation F Plan check/zoning clearance F Home occupation permit F Sign permit F Temporary use permit F Tree removal permit F Uniform sign program F Similar use determination F Reasonable accommodation F Site development review F Minor exception F Minor use permit F Conditional use permit R F' F ' Minor design review F Hillside development review F Large family day care permit F Mills Act R R F Landmark designation R R F Certificate of appropriateness R F Certificate of economic hardship R F Entertainment permit F Design review R F Variance R F? F 2 Adult entertainment permit R F Tentative subdivision map (see title 16) R F Planned community R R F Specific plan R R F Prezoning R R F Development Code/zoning map R R F amendment Development agreement R R F General plan amendment R R F Master plan R R F 3 3 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 ' Conditional use permit approval by the city council is required for all industrial buildings larger than 75,000 square feet in gross floor area, in which case,the planning commission shall be the recommending body. 2 A variance from a development standard in the industrial zoning districts requires approval by the city council,in which case the planning commission shall be the recommending body.. 3 A master plan is required for all industrial buildings larger than 450,000 square feet in gross floor area.See Section 17.22.020 (Master plan). 17.14.090 Permit time limits, extensions, and expiration. A. Time limits. Unless a condition of approval or other provision of this title establishes a different time limit, any permit not exercised within two years of approval shall expire and become void, except where an extension of time is approved pursuant to this section. B. Exercising permits. The exercise of a permit occurs when the property owner has performed substantial work as determined by the planning director and the building official and incurred substantial liabilities in good faith reliance upon such permit(s). A permit may be otherwise exercised pursuant to a condition of the permit or corresponding legal agreement that specifies that other substantial efforts or expenditures constitutes exercise of the permit. Unless otherwise provided, permits that have not been exercised prior to a zoning amendment, which would make the permitted use or structure nonconforming, shall automatically be deemed invalid on the effective date of the zoning amendment. C. Permit extensions. The approval of an extension extends the expiration date for two years from the original permit date. After this initial permit extension, a final one-year extension of time may be granted pursuant to the same process as set forth in this section. 1. Process. The same approving authority that granted the original permit may extend the period within which the exercise of a permit must occur. Notice and/or public hearing shall be provided in the same manner as for the original permit. An application for extension shall be filed not less than 30 days prior to the expiration date of the permit, along with appropriate fees and application submittal materials. 2. Conditions. The permit, as extended, may be conditioned to comply with any development standards that may have been enacted since the permit was initially approved. 3. Permit extension findings. The extension may be granted only when the designated approving authority finds that the original permit findings can still be made and there are no changed circumstances or there has been diligent pursuit to exercise the permit that warrants such extension. 4. Expiration. If the time limits are reached with no extension requested, or a requested extension is denied or expires, the permit expires. D. Permit expiration for a closed business. All permits and entitlements shall expire when a business is closed for more than one calendar year. Approval of new permits and entitlements based on current requirements shall be required prior to any business activity on the site. 17.14.100 Modification. A. Any person holding a permit granted under this title may request a modification to that permit. For the purpose of this section, the modification of a permit may include modification of the terms of the 4 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 permit itself, project or site design, or the waiver or alteration of conditions imposed in the granting of the permit. B. If the planning director determines that a proposed project action is not in substantial conformance with the original approval, the planning director shall notify the property owner of the requirement to submit a permit modification application to the Planning Department. _ C. The planning director may review and approve the permit modification application provided the proposed modifications will not cause any of the following to occur: 1. A change in the character, scope, size, and/or intensity of the development and/or use; 2. A significant increase in impacts on infrastructure or traffic on roadways adjacent to or external to the proposed development and/or use; 3. A change in the external impacts on adjacent property: and 4. A reduction in the originally approved setbacks from property lines or increase in building or structure height. D. If the planning director determines that the proposed permit modification does not comply with the provisions of subsection C above, the same approving authority as the original permit shall review the permit modification application. E. A permit modification may be granted only when the approving authority makes all findings required for the original approval. 5 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 Chapter 17.16 PLANNING DIRECTOR DECISIONS Sections: 17.16.010 Purpose and applicability. 17.16.020 Official Code interpretations. 17.16.025 Director determination process (with notice). 17.16.030 Plan check/zoning clearance. 17.16.040 Home occupation permit. 17.16.050 Sign permit. 17.16.060 Uniform sign program. 17.16.070 Temporary use permit. 17.16.080 Tree removal permit. 17.16.090 Similar use determination. 17.16.100 Site development review. 17.16.110 Minor exceptions. 17.16.120 ConditionaiMinOr use permit. 17.16.130 Minor design review. 17.16.140 Hillside development review. 17.16.150 Reasonable accommodation. 17.16.160 Large family day care permit. 17.16.170 Entertainment permit. 17.16.025 Director determination process (with notice). A. Purpose. Certain administrative permits and entitlements decided by the planning director require a notice to neighboring property owners. B. Applicability. Notice for director determination shall be provided for the following applications: 1. Tree removal permit(only if six or more). 2. Minor exceptions. 3. Minor Conditional use permits. /1 Large family Glad Gore C. Notice of application. Notice of an application for a tree removal permit for six or more trees, minor exceptions, and minor use permits, shall be given in compliance with the requirements of this section. The notice shall specify that the application will be decided by the city following an open public comment period where comment is received on or before a date specified in the notice which shall be ten days after the date of mailing. This notice shall also include an explanation of appeal rights. 1. Notice of the filing of an application for those applications identified in subsection B of this section shall be mailed to persons owning property within 660 feet of the property lines of the project site. 2. Notice of the filing of an application for a minor use permit to authorize uses and activities in the Neo-Industrial (NI) and Industrial Employment OE) industrial zones shall be mailed to persons owning property within 1,500 feet of the property lines of the project site 3. Notice of the filing of an application for tree removal permits or minor exceptions shall be mailed to persons owning property adjacent to the protect site. D. Decision. The director may approve, approve with conditions, or deny applications listed in this section. Decisions shall be based on standards and criteria set forth within this Code and shall be 6 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 accompanied by brief, written findings and a determination. Planning director decisions listed in section 17.16.025.13 (Applicability) above may be appealed to the planning commission. 17.16.110 Minor exceptions. A. Purpose. Exceptions may be needed to certain provisions to allow creative design solutions and to accommodate unique site conditions. B. Applicability. A minor exception may be granted to modify certain requirements of this Code, as listed in Table 17.16.110-1 (Standards Subject to Exception). Exceptions do not apply to land use and are not intended to waive a specific prohibition or procedural requirement. Additionally, a minor exception may be granted for exemptions from development standards for the repurposing or reuse of industrial warehouse and other large footprint buildings for alternative uses not envisioned when the structure was originally built, provided the use satisfies any allowed use and permit requirements provided in section 17.30.030 (Allowed Land Uses and Permit Requirements). TABLE 17.16.110-1 STANDARDS SUBJECT TO EXCEPTION Standard Maximum Reduction or Increase Maximum fence/wall height 2-foot increase Minimum amount of Pparking or loading spaces— o * Number required 25/o reduction Setbacks(increase) 10% reduction Maximum lot coverage fincease} 10% increase Maximum height ('RGrease) 10% increase *A proposed reduction in excess of 10%for industrial uses requires the completion of a parking study prepared by the City and paid for by the applicant to ensure the reduction will not cause a significant impact on nearby streets or other properties. C. Review process. An application for a minor exception shall be filed with the planning department in a manner prescribed by the planning director with the required fee as established by city council resolution. D. Public notice. The planning director shall, not less than ten days before rendering a decision, provide for public comment through notice to adjacent property owners of the pending application. E. Findings. The planning director shall approve, or approve with conditions, an application for an exception after finding all of the following. 1. The minor exception is consistent with the general plan or any applicable specific plan or development agreement. 2. The proposed development is compatible with existing and proposed land uses in the surrounding area. 3. The proposed exception to the specific development standard(s) is necessary to allow creative design solutions compatible with the desires of the community and/or accommodate unique site conditions. 4. The granting of the minor exception will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district, and will not be detrimental to public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. If the planning director does not make all of these findings, then the director shall deny the minor exception. F. Conditions. In approving a minor exception, the director may impose any reasonable conditions to ensure that the approval will comply with the findings required, as well as any performance criteria and development standards contained within this Code. 7 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 17.16.120 MinorConditional use permit. A. Purpose. The minor use permit provides a process for director review and determination of requests for uses and activities whose effects on adiacent sites and surroundings must be evaluated. These uses and activities -generally meet the purposes of the applicable zoning district but w4s require special consideration in their design or operation to ensure compatibility with surrounding or potential future uses. whose effects on adjacent sites and G61FFGURd'RgG Reed to be evaluated in terms o cnonifin development proposal for the specific site. It is anticipated that uses qualifying for a conditional minor use permit are minor in nature, only have an impact on immediately adjacent properties, and can be modified and/or conditioned to ensure compatibility. B. Applicability. This section applies to land use requiring a minorGE)Rditienal use permit as designated with an "MS"on the allowed use table (Table 17.30.030-1). C. Review process. An application for a conditional minor use permit shall be filed with the planning department in a manner prescribed by the planning director with the required fee as established by city council resolution. The planning director is the approving authority for conditional minoruse permits. However, the planning director may also refer a minor sond+tional use permit to the planning commission for review and approval as-pursuant to section 17.14.060.0 (Referral to the Planning Commission). D. Findings.The director shall approve, or approve with conditions, an application for a minor gend+tienal use permit after finding all of the following. 1. The proposed use is allewed within the appliGable ZGRiRg diStFiGt and GeMplies with all other specifiG plans OF city r ulatiens/standards aGGeGG:2. The- Site 06 phyGiGally suited f4gr the type, deRSity, and inteRsity of the piceposed Use utilities, and the absenGe of physical constraints and can he renditioned to Meet related perfermaRce criteria and development standard Granting the permit WOU'd Ret be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, er welfare, er maternally iRjUF1eUS to persons, propert,, overnents On the vicinity On which 1. The subject site is suitable for the type and intensity of use or development proposed, and the proposed location, size, and design of the use are compatible with adjacent uses or with natural resources; 2. The operating characteristics of the proposed use, including traffic, noise, light, and other characteristics, will be in keeping with the character of the neighborhood and other adjacent uses or uses in the vicinity; 3. The proposed improvements of the site, including building design, height and bulk of buildings, setbacks, fencing, landscaping, signage size and location, are compatible with the surrounding neighborhood or area; 4. That the proposed use shall not result in conditions that would be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare of the community; 5. Adequate public facilities and services are available to serve the proposed use or will be made available concurrent with the proposed development; 6. Allowing the proposed use at the proposed location would be consistent with and help achieve the goals, objectives, and policies of the general plan and the development code; and 7. The project would not result in a negative effect to the City's land use inventory available for residential and economic development, consistent with the intent of the general plan land use element. If the director does not make all of these findings, then the director shall deny the minor use permit. E. Conditions. In approving a cenditienal minor use permit, the director may impose any reasonable conditions to ensure that the approval will comply with the findings required, as well as any performance criteria and development standards contained within this Code. Chapter 17.20 8 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 PLANNING COMMISSION DECISIONS Sections: 17.20.010 Purpose. 17.20.020 Entertainment permit. 17.20.030 Variance. 17.20.040 Design review. 17.20.050 Adult entertainment permit. 17.20.060 Conditional use permit 17.20.040 Design review. A. Purpose. This section establishes the review procedures for residential, commercial, industrial, and institutional development proposals to facilitate project review by local responsible agencies and the development/design review committees in a timely and efficient manner; to ensure that development projects comply with all applicable local design guidelines, standards, and ordinances; to minimize adverse effects on surrounding properties and the environment; and to maintain consistency with the general plan, which promotes high aesthetic and functional standards to complement and add to the physical, economic, and social character of the city. In addition, the city finds that a design review process will support the implementation of the general plan, as it stresses quality community design standards.The city further finds that the quality of certain residential, institutional, commercial, and industrial uses has a substantial impact upon the visual appeal, environmental soundness, economic stability, and property values of the city. This section is not intended to restrict imagination, innovation, or variety, but rather to focus on community design principles which can result in creative imaginative solutions for the project and a quality design for the city. It is the purpose of this section to: 1. Recognize the interdependence of land values and aesthetics and provide a method by which the city may implement this interdependence to its benefit. 2. Encourage the orderly and harmonious appearance of structures and property within the city along with associated facilities, such as signs, landscaping, parking areas, and streets. 3. Maintain the public health, safety and general welfare, and property throughout the city. 4. Assist private and public developments to be more cognizant of public concerns for the aesthetics of development. 5. Reasonably ensure that new developments, including residential, institutional, commercial, and industrial developments, do not have an adverse aesthetic, health, safety, or architecturally related impact upon existing adjoining properties, or the city in general. 6. Implement those sections of the city's general plan that specifically refer to the preservation and enhancement of the particular character and unique assets of this city and its harmonious development. 7. Minimize the effects of grading by discouraging mass grading and excessive slopes to ensure that the natural character of terrain is retained. 8. Preserve significant topographic features, including rock outcroppings, native plant materials, and natural hydrology, while also encouraging improved drainage from lots directly to a street, storm drain, or through a public or privately maintained easement. 9. Limit the impact of slopes on adjacent developed properties and limit construction on identified seismic or geologic hazard areas. 9 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 10. Encourage the use of a variety of housing styles, split-level grading techniques, varied lot sizes, site design densities, maintenance of views, and arrangement and spacing to accomplish grading policies. 11. Help ensure that adequate school facilities for all existing and future residential development the city are provided 112. Help i„emu eensure that adequate levels of public services are provided for existing and future development in the city. 123. Encourage orderly development of residences within areas more readily served by public services. 134. Encourage the development of master planned projects that provide the service needs of the residents of these projects. 146. Encourage the use of energy conservation techniques in all new devete�residential, mixed use, institutional commercial, and industrial-development. B. Applicability. An application for design review is required for commercial, industrial, institutional, and residential projects with five or more dwelling „RitS involving the issuance of a building permit for construction or reconstruction of a structure which meets the following criteria. 1. New construction on vacant property where the proposed buildings are over 10,000 square fee in soze 20 2 Str,int, ral additions or new buildings whiGh are equal te eF eXGeed 50 perniant Af thp floor area of existing o site buildings) „r have a MOROM61M 10,000 square foot 'R 2. RP_r_,A_.nstF61GtiGR pFeJerts whirh are equal to 50 PeFGeRt of the floor area of existing on site buildiRg(S) or h-a„o a mipimum 10,000 square foot OR 1. New construction of residential projects with five or more dwelling units 2. New single or multiple building construction, on a vacant property or parcel/lot, with an overall (or, if multiple buildings, combined)floor area of 10,001 square feet or greater. 3. Structural additions to an existing building where the addition has a floor area that is 50 percent or more of the floor area of the existing building. 4. New building construction, on a developed property or parcel/lot, with an overall (or, if multiple buildings, combined)floor area of 10,001 square feet or greater. 5. Reconstruction projects which are greater than 50 percent of the floor area of an existing building (or, if multiple buildings, 50 percent of their combined floor area) or with a floor area of 10,001 square feet or greater. 64. Any project being proposed along a special boulevard as defined by the general plan, except for structures within projects with an approved master plan. 76. All projects which are master planned. Once the master plan, including architectural guidelines, has been approved by the planning commission, individual structures may be approved by the planning director. 86. All shopping centers over 10,000 square feet in size, except individual structures may be approved by the planning director where a master plan, including architectural guidelines, has been approved by the planning commission. 97-. Certain projects within a hillside area are subject to review pursuant to section 17.52 (Hillside Development). 106. All projects within Mixed Use Zoning Districts. Projects of a limited size and scope that do not meet these criteria may require an application for minor design review as defined in section 17.16.130 (Minor Design Review). 10 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 C. Review process. The design review procedure is outlined below. 1. Scheduling for committee review. Upon acceptance of a complete application for design review approval, a project shall be scheduled et on the first avertable agenda for committee review. The applicant and any persons requesting notice will be notified at least ten days prior to the committee meetings_.. 2. All development proposals submitted pursuant to this section are reviewed by the design review committee, which will make a recommendation on the project to the planning commission. Review and analysis by the design review committee will consider design elements, such as, but not limited to, compatibility of the project to surrounding properties, relationship of the design and layout of the project to the site, architectural design, and use of materials, grading, landscaping, screening and buffering techniques of adjacent properties, signs, and open space. The is--design review committee will determine if the project adequately meets city design guidelines and standards and will transmit an appropriate recommendation to the planning commission. The design review committee shall review the project design submittals and make recommendations to the planning d+reEtorcommission based on: i. Design and layout of the proposed development is consistent with the applicable elements of the city's general plan, design guidelines of the appropriate district, and any adopted architectural criteria for specialized area,such as designated historic districts,theme areas, specific plans, community plan, boulevards, or planned developments. ii. The design and layout of the proposed development will not unreasonably interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring, existing, or future developments, and will not create traffic or pedestrian hazards. iii. The architectural design of the proposed development is compatible with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and will maintain the harmonious, orderly, and attractive development contemplated by this section and the general plan of the city. iv. The design of the proposed development would provide a desirable environment for its occupants and the visiting public as well as its neighbors through good aesthetic use of materials, texture, and color that will remain aesthetically appealing and will retain a reasonably adequate level of maintenance. 3. Proposals submitted pursuant to this section may also require review by other necessary committees as applicable (e.g., trails). D. Findings.The planning commission shall make the following findings before approving a design review application: 1. The proposed project is consistent with the general plan and any applicable specific plan; 2. The proposed rp eject-use is in accord with the objective of this Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; 3. The proposed rp olect—use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of this Development Code; and 4. The proposed rp oject use, together with any applicable the-conditions applicable the re+n will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. E. Planning commission decision and cSonditions. The planning commission is authorized to approve or deny applications and to impose reasonable conditions upon such approval, as the commission may deem necessary to ensure compatibility with surrounding uses, to preserve the public health, safety, and welfare, and to enable the commission to make the findings required by section 17.20.040.D (Findings). 11 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 17.20.060 Conditional use permit A. Purpose. The purpose of a conditional use permit is to provide a public review process for the discretionary review of proposed uses and activities that require special consideration to ensure that their effects are compatible with locational, use, structural, traffic, and/or the characteristics of neighboring properties and the community. This discretionary review process is intended to ensure land use compatibility and to mitigate potential impacts or conflicts that could otherwise result from the proposed use. More specifically, a conditional use permit is intended to: 1. To consider the relationship of the use or project to the surrounding area, neighborhood, and community as a whole; 2. To determine if the proiect's use and location is compatible with the types of uses that are normally permitted in the surrounding area; 3. To consider the compatibility of the proposed use with the site's characteristics; 4. To evaluate the adequacy of services and facilities for the proposed use; 5. To provide an opportunitV for public review and comment on the proposed use; and 6. To identify conditions and requirements necessary to comply with the basic purposes of this Code, the General Plan, and any applicable plans or regulations B. Applicability. This section applies to any land use requiring a conditional use permit as designated with a "C" on the allowed use table (Table 17.30.030-1). Any development subject to approval of a conditional use permit must comply with all applicable requirements of this Section. C. Application requirements. An application for a conditional use permit shall be filed with the planning department in a manner prescribed bV the planning director with the required fee as established by city council resolution. D. Approving authority. The planning commission is the approving authority for conditional use permits, except that the approving authority for all industrial buildings with a gross floor area of 75,000 square feet or greater is the city council. The planning commission may approve, conditionally approve, or deny a conditional use permit application. In instances when an application for a conditional use permit is processed concurrently with other land use entitlements requiring action by the city council, the planning commission shall make a recommendation on the conditional use permit application to the city council. F. Findings.The planning commission and city council shall make the following findings before approving a conditional use permit application: 1. The proposed use is consistent with the general plan and any applicable specific plan, 2. The proposed use is consistent with the purposes of the development code and the purposes of the applicable zoning district as well as any applicable specific plans or city regulations/standards. 3. The site is physically suitable for the type, density, and intensity of the use being proposed, including access, utilities, and the absence of physical constraints that would make conduct of the use undesirable. 4. The design, location, size and operating characteristics of the proposed use would be compatible with the existing and other permitted uses in the vicinity including transportation and service facilities. 5. Granting the permit would not constitute a nuisance or be incurious to detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, or materially incurious to persons, property, or improvements in the vicinity and zoning district in which the property is located. The factors to be considered in making this finding include: a. Property damage or nuisance arising from noise, smoke, odor, dust, vibration or illumination caused bV the use; 12 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 b. Hazard to persons or property from possible explosion, contamination, fire or flood caused by the use; and, c. Significantly increase fothe volume of traffic or negatively alter the pattern of traffic. 6. The proposed use will not pose an undue burden on city services, including police, fire, streets, and other public utilities, such that the city is unable to maintain its current level of service due to the use; and 7. Based on the conclusions of a fiscal/economic impact study, including an employment analysis and a fiscal impact analysis, the proposed use is consistent with the city's economic development strategic plan and will not create a fiscal hardship to the city. 8. The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA). G. Conditions of approval. The approving authority may impose reasonable conditions of approval to enable it to make the above findings and to ensure that the use will meet all applicable performance criteria, regulations, and standards and is compatible with surrounding uses, and to preserve the public health, safety, and welfare. H. Approval applies to land. Any conditional use permit approval shall run with the land and shall continue to be valid for the time period specified, whether or not there is a change of ownership of the site or structure to which it applies. Conditional use permit approval cannot be transferred to another site. 13 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 CITY COUNCIL DECISIONS Sections: 17.22.010 Purpose. 17.22.020 Master plan. 17.22.030 Specific plan and planned community. 17.22.040 Development Code/zoning map amendment. 17.22.050 Prezoning. 17.22.060 Development agreement. 17.22.070 General plan amendment. 17.22.020 Master plan. A. Purpose. The purpose of a master plan is to allow for the coordinated comprehensive planning of a subarea of the city in order to accomplish any of the following objectives: 1. Protect a unique environmental, historical, architectural, or other significant site feature that cannot be adequately protected by adoption of another land use zone. 2. Allow the development of an exceptional project design that cannot be built under an existing zoning district or due to constraints of existing development standards. 3. Further the implementation of specific goals and policies of the city as provided in the general plan. 4. "Plan ahead"and look beyond the limits of a particular property to solve circulation,drainage, and neighborhood compatibility problems. 5. Provide flexibility for developments beyond conventional zoning regulations to address special or unique needs or characteristics. B. Review process. 1. A master plan may be initiated by motion of the planning commission or the city council, by application of property owner(s) of parcel(s) to be affected by the master plan, or by recommendation of the planning director for any reason beneficial to the city. 2. The designated approving authority for a master plan is the city council, which shall hold a public hearing on the planning commission recommendation prior to taking action. The planning commission shall hold a public hearing and then shall provide a recommendation, which recommendation shall include the reasons for the recommendation and the relationship of the proposal to the general plan. The city council approves or denies the master plan by resolution in accordance with the requirements of this title. C. Master plan requirements. 1. A master plan shall include all of the following components: i. Physical characteristics of the site. ii. Location of structures and other significant improvements. iii. Significant natural features of the site. iv. Available public facilities. V. Capacity of existing and planned circulation systems. vi. Existing and planned uses within 1,000 feet. vii. Land within 1,000 feet of the site that is designated as state responsibility area (SRA) or wildland-urban interface fire area. PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 viii. A boundary map of the property and a calculation of the gross land area within the proposed district. A tentative subdivision map may be substituted if the applicant proposes to subdivide the property. ix. A discussion of specific objectives and limits for development of the property which recognize and respond to identified opportunities and constraints of the master plan. x. Proposed land use and a description of how the land uses implement the general plan. A. Proposed density ranges for proposal that include housing and how the density ranges correspond to the general plan. xii. Land use plan including, but not limited to, the acreage of each land use type and number of housing units by type. The distribution of land uses shall be expressed in terms of acreage and the total number of residential units and/or square footage of nonresidential buildings allowed. xiii. A circulation plan showing existing and proposed public and private streets, pedestrian ways, trails, and related transportation access or circulation features required to serve the proposed development. 2. The master plan may include a procedure for review of proposed development, such as: i. Performance and development standard requirements related to setbacks, lot area, intensity of development on each lot, parking requirements, landscaping, and signs. ii. Design standards and guidelines as appropriate for the specific site and development. iii. Open space plan including protection measures for significant natural features, parks, and other site amenities. iv. A site specific wildfire protection plan. v. Types of projects that require review. vi. Documents required from developers. vii. Regulations relating to nonconforming lots, uses, structures, and signs. viii. Time phasing and sequence of development projects. 3. Pursuant to section 17.14.060 and other provisions of this title, a master plan is required for large industrial buildings of 450,000 square feet or more. i. The purpose of the master plan for such industrial buildings is to ensure that the development does not impose significant burdens on City services and nearby businesses and residents, as well as to ensure that the development has adequate public services and infrastructure to accommodate the expected uses. In addition, the master planning process is expected to ensure that the proposed industrial development provides community benefits that may not otherwise be provided through strict application of the provisions of this title. ii. Upon recommendation by the city engineer and fire marshal, a master plan may vary or waive the traffic standards identified in section 17.36.040 if the city council determines that doing so would not frustrate the underlying purpose of the subject standard(s) or cause a significant impact on public health, safety, or welfare. D. Findings. A master plan shall not be adopted unless the following findings are made: 1. The proposed master plan is consistent with the goals, policies, and objectives of the general plan. 2. The proposed master plan meets the requirements set forth in this title. PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 ARTICLE III. ZONING DISTRICTS, ALLOWED USES,AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Chapter 17.26 ESTABLISHMENT OF ZONING DISTRICTS Sections: 17.26.010 Chapter Purpose. 17.26.020 Zoning districts established. 17.26.020 Zoning districts established. A. Zoning district purpose. Zoning districts are established in order to classify, regulate, designate, and distribute the uses of land and buildings; to regulate and restrict the height, setbacks and bulk of buildings; to regulate the area of yards and other open spaces around buildings; and to regulate the density of population. The city is divided into zoning districts that are grouped into two categories: (a) base zoning districts and (b) overlay zoning districts. These districts are listed and described in Table 17.26.020-1 (Rancho Cucamonga Zoning Districts), along with the general plan land use designation that they implement. B. Base zoning districts. The base zoning district is the primary zoning district that applies to a property. Every parcel throughout the city has a base zoning district that establishes the primary land use type, density, intensity, and site development regulations. Base districts are grouped into six categories as follows: 1. Residential Zoning Districts. 2. Mixed Use Zoning Districts. 3. Commercial and Office Zoning Districts. 4. Industrial Zoning Districts. 5. Open Space Zoning Districts. 6. Special Purpose Zoning Districts. C. Overlay zoning districts. The Overlay Zoning Districts supplement base zoning districts for one or more of the following purposes: 1. To allow more flexibility from the standard provisions of the underlying base zone. 2. To protect unique site features or implement location-specific regulations. 3. To specify a particular standard or guideline for an area. D. In the event of a conflict between the regulations of the base zoning district and the Overlay Zoning District, the provisions of the Overlay Zoning District shall apply. 1 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 TABLE 17.26.020-1 RANCHO CUCAMONGA ZONING DISTRICTS Zoning District Zoning District Name/Description Symbol Residential Zoning Districts Very Low Residential. Designates areas for very low density residential use, with a minimum VL lot size of 20,000 square feet and a maximum residential density of up to 2 units per gross acre. L Low Residential. Designates areas for single-family residential use, with a minimum lot size of 7,200 square feet and a maximum residential density of 4 units per gross acre. Low Medium Residential. Designates areas for low medium density single-family or multiple- LM family use with site development regulations that assure development compatible with nearby single-family detached neighborhoods. Residential densities range from 4 to 8 units per gross acre maximum. Medium Residential. Designates areas for medium density multiple-family use, with site M development regulations that assure development compatible with nearby lower density residential development. Residential densities range from 8 to 14 units per gross acre maximum. Medium High Residential. Designates areas for medium high density multiple-family use, MH with site development regulations that assure development compatible with nearby lower density residential development. Residential densities range from 14 to 24 units per gross acre maximum. High Residential. Designates areas for high density multiple-family use, with site H development regulations that assure development compatible with nearby lower density residential development. Residential densities range from 24 to 30 units per gross acre. Mixed Use Zoning District Mixed Use. Designates areas for a mix of residential and nonresidential uses, with site MU development regulations that assure development compatible with nearby lower density residential development, as well as internal compatibility among the varying uses. Commercial and Office Zoning Districts Office/Professional. Designates areas primarily for the development of OP Professional/administrative offices and personal services rather than commodities. Site development regulations and performance standards are designed to make such uses relatively compatible with residential uses. Neighborhood Commercial. Designates areas for immediate day-to-day convenience NC shopping and services for the residents of the immediate neighborhood. Site development regulations and performance standards are intended to make such uses compatible to and harmonious with the character of surrounding residential or less intense land use area. General Commercial. Designates areas for general commercial activities and services of a more intensive nature, including but not limited to major shopping facilities, major service- GC oriented uses, major financial, and corporate headquarters that are designed to serve the city or the region as a whole and are typically located primarily along major transportation routes. 2 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 Zoning District Zoning District Name/Description Symbol CC Community Commercial. Designates areas for commercial activities and services on a larger scale. Businesses are typically auto oriented and located along major commercial corridors. Specialty Commercial. Designates areas designed to enhance the character around historic resources or sites which promote a special landmark quality or create a special ambience. Examples include specialty theme-oriented uses located adjacent to the Thomas Brothers SC Winery, which complement the existing winery structure and provide a unifying theme or the establishment of tourist-oriented specialty uses in other areas, which cater to visitors. A limited number of office uses have been included into the specialty commercial category in order to facilitate an interactive office/commercial environment. Regional Related Commercial. Designates areas for large-scale commercial development RRC that serves both local and regional needs. Sites are easily accessible from freeways and may contain a variety of goods and services, such as large-format retail, department stores, eating and drinking establishments, hotels, and motels. Commercial Office. Designates areas for activities that cater to business support and CO personal services. Uses typically include medical and health care clinics, travel agencies, insurance agencies, copy centers, and other similar land uses. Industrial Zoning Districts Industrial Park. Designates areas for industrial firms seeking an attractive and pleasant working environment and a location which has prestige value. The district allows light IP industrial uses, office and administration facilities, research and development laboratories, and limited types of warehousing, as well as support businesses and commercial service uses. Neo-Industrial. Designates areas to support a complementary mix of uses such as, research and development, light and custom manufacturing, engineering and design services, breweries, and maker spaces, as well as accessory office, retail and limited residential uses to compliment the primary use; supportive amenities and services; and convenient transit access. This zoning district encourages light industrial activities with low environmental impacts and supports the growth of creative industries, incubator businesses, and innovative design and manufacturing. The zoning district is not intended for conventional industrial business such as warehousing, distribution/fulfillment centers, and NI G4 heavy manufacturing.f r a hybrod ipriYctrial ZGRe that serves of uses inGI61 dmRq but Ret Y, oted tG FGSeaFGh and deVeIGPMeR+ light anal G MGM m pL JfaGt tripq o breweries, Rd maker spaGeS. AGGeScE,r"Gf mGe ro+oil and r cideRtial uses GOMIDIGMeRtary mix of lew impaGt oRd uctrial uses .,i+h suigigc prove amenities and! s.c D86igRates areas for the widest possible raRge of light and mediurn iRdystrial aGtmv*l 0 ncluding manufacturing, assembling, fabrication, wholesaling, heavy commercial, and office uses. The district may be employed as a buffer between nonindustrial uses and heavy inrl ctrial u coc Minimum Import/Hemp, Inrdu ctriallndustrial Employment. Designates areas reserved for heavier manufacturing, processing, construction and heavy equipment yards, warehousing and storage, e-commerce distribution, light industrial research parks, automobile and vehicle IE Ml� services, and a broad range of similar clean industrial practices and processes that t ply generate more truck traffic, noise, and environmental impacts than would be compatible with office and residential uses.oRdus+rial uses of all t„pas in,.'ud'Rg mr,r,,,faGtUrin .,aroh oipr. @Rd StEF@Qe, IGQOStGS GGRteFS, and or"eo4eaR 'Rd6istriak4 ej. This zoning district prohibits 3 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 Zoning District Zoning District Name/Description Symbol non-industrial uses, except for accessory office and commercial uses (such as restaurants or convenience stores)that support the emploVees of the primary industrial use, and on-site caretaker units. Designates areas for heavy industrial uses that Will not SigRifiGaRtly impact the S61rroyRdiRg area including but not limited to, manufacturing, compounding, processing, fabrwcatbp,, wa,"-eheLlSiRg, storage, and freight hay-„-JIiRg fabrication,Heavy industrial. Designates areas for heavy industrial uses including manufactu i 1=4 compounding, processing, warehousing, storage, and freight handling. Use GhaFaGteriStOGS of this group ORGILIde large StFLIGtLiFeS to facilitate PFOGeSSORg and Gpe- I storage of large amounts of raw or semi refined product—s. Open Space Zoning Districts Open Space. Designates areas primarily to protect environmentally sensitive land. The use OS regulations, development standards, and criteria provide low intensity development and encourage recreational activities and preservation of natural resources. Hillside Residential. Designates areas for maintaining natural open space character through protection of natural landforms; minimizing erosion; providing for public safety; protecting HR water, flora, and fauna resources; and establishing design standards to provide for limited development in harmony with the environment. Allowed density is a maximum of 2 units per net buildable acre as determined through the Hillside Development Review process. FC Flood Control. Designates areas necessary for flood control facilities for protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. UC Utility Corridor. Designates areas within utility corridors in which land uses compatible to both the utility function and surrounding, existing, or proposed land uses are allowed. Special Purpose Zoning Districts Specific Plan. Designates areas for master planning through the adoption of a specific plan SP with unique land use and development standards for a particular project areas with a minimum of 300 acres. Planned Community. Designates areas master planning through the adoption of a Planned PC Community, which can establish unique land use and development standards for a particular project area. Planned Communities typically include less detail than specific plans and have no minimum project size requirement. Overlay Zoning Districts Senior Housing. Designates areas available for affordable rental housing units to serve the SH city's senior citizens. District provisions ensure high quality project design and establish incentives for ongoing affordability for this target group. This district can be combined with any residential base zoning district that meets the overlay district qualifications. Equestrian. Designates areas for the keeping of equine, bovine, and cleft-hoofed animals. E Further, this district protects the ability to maintain such animals, promotes a "rural/farm" character in an urban setting, and recognizes and encourages the educational and recreational values derived from raising and maintaining such animals. This district may be 4 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 Zoning District Zoning District Name/Description Symbol combined with any residential base zoning district that meets the overlay district qualifications. Foothill Boulevard. Designates areas along Foothill Boulevard for special use and development regulations to implement the goals and objectives in the general plan for this FB important corridor that covers most of the length of Historic Route 66 through the city. Special regulations encourage a mix of uses, concentrate neighborhood, community, and regional-serving uses as appropriate, and accommodate future transit. Hillside. Designates sloped areas subject to special hillside development regulations. H Generally, this district applies to areas with a slope greater than or equal to 8%. This district may be combined with any residential base zoning district that meets the overlay district qualifications. HA Haven Avenue. Designates an area along Haven Avenue with unique allowed use regulations and development standards focused on high quality office opportunities. Industrial Commercial. Designates areas with an Industrial Park Base Zoning District to IC encourage and support the integration of traditional general commercial uses and special development review requirements focused on retail opportunities. LW Large Warehouse. Designates areas with a gross floors ace over 450,000 square feet 5 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 ARTICLE III. SITE DEVELOPMENT PROVISIONS Chapter 17.30 ALLOWED USE BY BASE ZONING DISTRICT Sections: 17.30.010 Purpose. 17.30.020 Classification of land uses. 17.30.030 Allowed land uses and permit requirements. 17.30.040 Other allowed use provisions 17.30.030 Allowed land uses and permit requirements. A. Allowed land uses. Allowed uses and corresponding permit and entitlement requirements for the base zoning districts are listed in Table 17.30.030-1 (Allowed Land Uses and Permit Requirements by Base Zoning District). Uses are organized into common categories as follows: 1. Residential uses. 2. Agriculture and animal related uses. 3. Recreation, resource preservation, open space, education, and public assembly uses. 4. Utility, transportation, public facility, and communication uses. 5. Retail, service, and office uses. 6. Automobile and vehicle uses. 7. Industrial, manufacturing, and processing uses. B. Permit requirements. Generally, a use is either allowed by right, allowed through issuance of a conditional use permit, or not permitted. In addition to the requirements for planning permits or entitlements listed herein, other permits and entitlements may be required prior to establishment of the use (e.g., building permit or permits required by other agencies). The requirements for planning permits or entitlements identified in Table 17.30.030-1 (Allowed Land Uses and Permit Requirements by Base Zoning District) include: 1. Permitted(P). A land use shown with a "P" indicates that the land use is permitted by right in the designated zoning district, subject to compliance with all applicable provisions of this title (e.g., development standards)as well state and federal law. 2. Permitted with a Minor Use Permit(M). A land use shown with an "M" indicates that the land use is permitted in the designated zoning district upon issuance of a minor use permit from the designated approving authority, subject to compliance with all applicable provisions of this zoning code (e.g., development standards)as well as state and federal law. 3. Conditionally permitted(C). A land use shown with a "C" indicates that the land use is permitted in the designated zoning district upon issuance of a conditional use permit from the 1 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 designated approving authority, subject to compliance with all applicable provisions of this zoning code (e.g., development standards)as well as state and federal law. 4. Not permitted(N). A land use shown with an "N" is not allowed in the applicable zoning district. Additionally, uses not shown in the table are not permitted, except as otherwise provided for in this title. 5. Adult entertainment permit(A). A land use shown with an "A" indicates that the land use is permitted in the designated zoning district upon issuance of an adult entertainment permit from the designated approving authority, subject to compliance with all applicable provisions of this zoning code (e.g., development operational standards) as well as state and federal law. C. Base zoning district names and symbols. Base zoning district names for the zoning district symbols used in the table are listed below. Specific Plan (SP) District and Planned Community (PC) District are not listed in the table as the allowed uses for those base zoning districts are determined in compliance with the adopted Specific Plan or Planned Community. •Very Low Residential (VL) • Specialty Commercial (SC) • Low Residential (L) • Regional Related Commercial (RRC) • Low Medium Residential (LM) • Commercial Office (CO) • Medium Residential (M) • Industrial Park (IP) • Medium High Residential (MH) • Neo-Industrial (NI) (_oaornl Ind striae (GI) • Industrial Employment (IE) "gin • High Residential (H) I,,,,,aGVHeayy I.dustrial (MUH ) • Mixed Use (MU) • Open Space (OS) ueay Rdustl4a. " • Office Professional (OP) • Hillside Residential District (HR)QPen-Space PS-) • Neighborhood Commercial (NC) • Flood Control-Open Space (FC) Hillside Resin Rtial DiotriGt (HRA • General Commercial (GC) • Utility Corridor-Open Space (UC) Flood Control • Community Commercial (CC) TABLE 17.30.030-1: ALLOWED LAND USES AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS BY BASE ZONING DISTRICT Land Use/Zoning VL L LM M MH H MU OP NC GC CC Sc RRC CO IP GINI MI"IE OS HR FC UC District — — Residential Uses Adult Day Care Home P P P P P P P N N N N N N N N N N N P N N Caretaker Housing CM CM CM CM CM CM CM P P P N N N N CM CM CM P CM P P Dwelling,Multi-Family N N P P P P P N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Dwelling,Single-Family P P P P N N N N N N N N N N N N N P P N N Dwelling,Two-Family N N P P P P P N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Emergency Shelter N N N N N N N N N P N N N N N CN NN N N N N Family Day Care Home, CM CM CM GM CM CM CM N N N N N N N N N N N CM N N Large t��1 — — 2 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 Land Use/Zoning VL L LM M MH H MU OP NC GC CC SC RRC CO IP GINI MIIHIIE OS HR FC UC District — Family Day Care Home, P P P P P P P N N N N N N N N N N N P N N Small Guest House P P P N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Group Residential GM GM GM GM GM GM GM GM GM GM GM N GM N N N N N GM N N Home Occupation(2) P P P P P P P N N N N N N N N N N P P N N Live-Work Facility N N N N N N P N N N N N N N N NC NC N N N N Manufactured Home(3) P P P P N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P N N Mobile Home Park(3) GM GM GM GM GM GM N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Residential Care Facility N GM GM GM GM IGIN N N N N N N N N N N N N N Residential Care Home P P P P P N N N N N N N N N N P N N Short-Term Rental(16) P P P P P P N N P P P P N P P P P P Single-Room N N N P P N N N N N N N N N N N N N Occupancy FacilityTransitional Housing P P P P P N N N N N N N N N N P N N Agriculture and Animal-Related Uses Agricultural Uses N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P N P P Animal Keeping, P P P P P P P N N N N N N N N N N N P N N Domestic Pets(') Animal Keeping,Exotic GM GM GM GM GM GM GM N N N N N N N N N N N GM N N Animals(4) — — — — — — — — Animal Keeping,Insects(a) P N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Animal Keeping, P P N N N N N N N N N N N N GM N N N N N N Livestock Animals(a) Animal Keeping,Poultry(a) P N N N N N N N N N N N N N GM N N N N N N Equestrian Facility, GM N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N GM N GM CM Commercial — — — Equestrian Facility, P N N N N N N N N N JN Hobby N N N N N N N NLand Use/Zoning VL L LM M MH H MU OP NC GC RRC CO IP GINI MI/HIIE OS HR FC UC District — — Recreation,Resource Preservation,Open Space,Education,and Public Assembly Uses Assembly Use GM GM GM GM GM GM CM GM GM GM GM GM GM GM GM C N N N N N Cemetery/Mausoleum N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N GM N N N Community Center/Civic GM GM CM CM GM GM CM CM GM GM CM GM GM N P P N N GM N N Use Community Garden GM GM CM CM GM GM N N N N N N N N N N N P N P P Convention Center N N N N N N GM CM GM GM CM CM GM CM CM C C N N N N Golf Course/Clubhouse N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N GM N GM GM Indoor Amusement/ N N N N N N GM N GM GM P P P N GM C N N N N N Entertainment Facility — — — Indoor Fitness and N N N N N N CM CM GM GM CM CM GM CM CM C N N N N N Sports Facility—Large Indoor Fitness and N N N N N N P P P P P GM P P CM C N N N N N Sports Facility—Small Library and Museum GM GM GM GM GM GM P P P P N P N P GM N N GM GM GM GM 3 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 Outdoor Commercial N N N N N N CM CM GM CM N N CM GM GM C N N N N N Recreation Park and Public Plaza P P P P P P P N N N N N N N NM NM NM P P P P Public Safety Facility SM SM CM CM GM CM CM CM GM CM GM GM CM GM GM C C N CM N N Resource-Related P P P P P P P N N N N N N N N N N P P P P Recreation School,Academic GM GM CM CM CM CM CM CM GM CM GM GM CM GM GM C N N CM N N (Private) School,Academic P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P N N P N N (Public) School, College/University GM GM CM CM GM CM CM CM GM CM GM GM CM GM GM C N N CM N N (Private) School, College/University GM GM GM GM GM GM GM GM GM GM GM GM CM CM CM C N N C N N (Public) Schools,Specialized Education and N N N N N N CM CM 6M CM 6M SM CM CM C C CN N N N N Training/Studio Theaters and N N N N N N CM N N CM N N P N N N N N N N N Auditoriums Tutoring Center—Large N N N N N N CM CM GM CM GM CM CM CM N N N N N N N Tutoring Center—Small N N N N N N P P P P P P P P N N N N N N N Utility,Transportation,Public Facility,and Communication Uses Broadcasting and N N N N N N N P N P N N N P P P N N N N N Recording Studios Park and Ride Facility N N N N N N N CM CM CM N N N N PC P NC N N N N Parking Facility N N N N N N NP NP N NP CN N CN NP CN CN NC N N CN CN Transit Facility N N N N N N N N N N N N N N CM C C N N N N Utility Facility and Infrastructure—Fixed N N N N N N N N N N N N N N CM C C C N CM GM Based Structures 5> Utility Facility and Infrastructure— P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P Pipelines(1) Wind Energy System— P N N N N N N N N N N N N N NP PN CP N N N N Small(11) Land Use/Zoning VL L LM M MH H MU OP NC GC CC SC RRC CO IP GINI INIIHIIE OS HR FC UC District — — Retail,Service,and Office Uses Adult Day Care Facility N N N N N N CM CM CM CM N N N CM C C N N N N N Adult-Oriented Business(s) N N N N N N N N N N N N N N A A A N N N N Alcoholic Beverage N N N N N N CM N CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM N N N N N Sales Ambulance Service N N N N N N N CM GM CM N N N N N C P N N N N Animal Sales and N N N N N N P N P P P P N N N N N N N N N Grooming Art,Antique,Collectable N N N N N N P N P P P P P N N N N N N N N Shop(") Artisan Shop(") N N N N N N P N P P P P P N N N N N N N N Bail Bonds N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Banks and Financial N N N N N N CM CM GM P P P P P P P N N N N N Services 4 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 Bar/Nightclub N N N N N N GM GM N CM GM GM GM GM N C N N N N N Bed and Breakfast Inn GM GM CM N N N N N N N GM GM N N N N N N N N N Building Materials Store N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N CM P N N N N and Yard Business Support N N N N N N P P P P P P P P P P NP N N N N Services Call Center N N N N N N N N N N I N N N N GM GM NC N N N N Card Room N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Check Cashing Business(7) N N N N N N P N P P N N N N P N N N N N N Child Day Care N N N N N N GM GM GM GM GM N CM CM CM PC PN N N N N Facility/Center Commercial Cannabis N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Activity Consignment Store N N N N N N CM N GM GM N GM N N N N N N N N N Convenience Store N N N N N N P N P P N GM N N GM CM N N N N N Crematory Services(7) N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N CM N N N N N Drive-In and Drive- Through Sales and N N N N N N GM GM GM GM CM N GM GM GM GM N N N N N Service(1) Land Use/Zoning VL L LM M MH H MU OP NC GC CC SC RRC CO IP GINI WHIIE OS HR FC UC District Equipment Sales and N N N N N N N N N CM N N N N N C P N N N N Rental Feed and Tack Store N N N N N N N N P P N N N N N N N N N N N Furniture,Furnishing, N N N N N N P N P P P P P N N N N N N N N and Appliance Store Garden Center/Plant N N N N N N P N P P P N P N N P NP P N P P Nursery Grocery N N N N N N P N P P P N P N N N N N N N N Store/Supermarket Gun Sales N N N N N N N N N CM N N N N NM NM N N N N N Hookah Shop N N N N N N GM N N GM N N N N N N N N N N N Home Improvement N N N N N N P N P P P N P N GM P NP N N N N Supply Store Hotel N j N j N N N N GM GM N GM N N GM GM GM N N N N N N Internet Cafe N N N N N N P P P P P P P P P NP PIN N N N N Kennel,Commercial N N N N N N N N N GM GM N GM N GM C N N N N N Liquor Store N N N N N N CM N GM GM GM GM GM N GM GM N N N N N Maintenance and Repair,Small N N N N N N P N P P P N P P NP P P N N N N Equipment Massage Establishment N N N N N N P P P P P P P P N N N N N N N Massage Establishment,Ancillary N N N N N N P P P P P P P P P P N N N N N pia) Medical Services, N GM GM GM GM GM GM P N P P N N P P P N N N N N Extended Care Medical Services, N N N N N N P P P P P P P P P P N N N N N General Medical Services, N N CM Hospitals GM GM GM GM GM N GM N N N N P P N N N N N - 5 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 Land Use/Zoning VL L LM M MH H MU OP NC GC CC SC RRC CO IP GINI MIIHIIE OS HR FC UC District — — Mobile Hot Food Truck N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N NP PN N N N N Mortuary/Funeral Home N N N N N N N GM GM GM N N N N N N N N N N N Office,Business and N N N N N N P P P P P P P P P P N N N N N Professional Office,Accessory N N N N N N P P P P P P P P P P NP N N N N Pawnshop(') N N N N N N N N N GM N N N N N N N N N N N Personal Services N N N N N N P P P P P P P P P P NP N N N N Restaurant,No Liquor N N N N N N P P P P P P P P P P NP N N N N Service — Restaurant,Beer and N N N N N N P P P P P P P P P P NC N N N N Wine Restaurant,Full Liquor N N N N N N GM GM GM GM GM GM GM GM GM GM N N N N N Service Retail,Accessory N N N N N N P P P P P N P P GM GM NP N N N N Retail,General N N N N N N P N P P P P P N GM GM NC N N N N Retail,Warehouse Club N N N N N N P N N P P N P N P N N N N N N Secondhand Dealer N N N N N N P N P P N N N N N N N N N N N Shooting Range N N N N N N N N N N N N N N NM C N N VNN N Smoke Shop(') N N N N N N N N N GM GM N GM N N N N NN Specialty Food Store(11) N N N N N N P N P P P P P N N N N NN Tattoo Shop(') N N N N N N N N N SM N N N N N N N NN Thrift Store(7) N N N N N N GM N GM SM 6M N SM N N N N NN Veterinary Facility GM N N N N N SM N P P GM GM --_M N N P P NN Automobile and Vehicle Uses A-t n hor N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Dismaling Auto and Vehicle Sales N N N N N N N GM N GM N N P N GM GM N N N N N and Rental Auto and Vehicle Sales, N N N N N N N P P P P N P P P N N N N N N Autobroker Auto and Vehicle Sales, N N N N N N N P P P P N P P P P N N N N N Wholesale Auto and Vehicle N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N GN C_N N N N N Storage Auto Parts Sales N N N N N N N N P P N N P N N N N N N N N Car Washing and N N N N N N N N N GM GM N GM N GM N N N N N N Detailing Parking Facility N N N N N N P P N P C N C P N N N N N C C Recreational Vehicle N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C C N N N N Storage Service Stations N N N N N N GM GM GM P GM N GM GM GM GM N N N N N Vehicle Services,Major N N N N N N N N N GM N N N N N P P N N N N Vehicle Services,Minor N N N N N N N GM GM P N N GM N P P N N N N N Land Use/Zoning VL L LM M MH H MU OP NC GC CC SC RRC CO IP AINI 101411E OS HR FC UC District — — Industrial,Manufacturing,and Processing Uses(17) Commercial (Secondary/Accessory) N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P P NP N N N N -Industrial 6 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 Commercial (Repurposing)- N N N N N N N N N N N N N N CM C C N N N N Industrial E-Commerce Distribution Distribution/ N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C N N N N Fulfillment Center — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Parcel Sorting N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C C N N N N Facilities — — — — — — — — — — — — — N N N N N N Parcel Hub Small N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M M N N N N (<130,000 so.ft.) — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Parcel Hub Large N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C N N N N (>130,000 sq.ft.) Fuel Storage aF4 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C C N N N N Dostrib-inn Lumber Yard N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C N N N N Maker Space/Accessory N N N N N M N N N N N N N N M P P N N N N Maker Space Manufacturing,Custom N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P P N N N N N Manufacturing,Green N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P P N N N N Technology — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — enaRufaGtu.i„e Heavy N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Rq,Heavy n �...,,aGturi....,,.« N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P N N N N Manufacturing,Lighter N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P C NM N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P P P N N N N Microbrewery N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P P NP N N N N Printing and Publishing N N N N N N N N N P N N N N P P N N N N N Recycling Facility, N N N N N N N N P P N N N N N PC PC N N N N Collection — — Recycling Facility, N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C C N N N N Processing ReGyGldRg FaGillty T�1�^3T�'^`T� N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N €asiiity Research and N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P P NP N N N N Development Storage,Personal N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C C N N N N Storage Facility Storage Warehouse N N N N N N N N N CM N N N N N C C N N N N Storage Yard N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C PC N N N N 1nn,elesale Ste..,ee N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C P N N N N Wholesale,Storage, and Distribution- N N N N N N N N N N N N N N PM PC P N N N N Light Wholesale,Storage, and Distribution- N N N N N N N N N N N N N N PM PC P N N N N Medium(12) Work/Live N N N N N N N N N N N N N N PM PM PM N N N N Table Notes: (1) Reserved. (2) See additional regulations for home occupations in Chapter 17.92. (3) See additional regulations for mobile homes in Chapter 17.96. (4) See additional regulations for animal keeping in Chapter 17.88. 7 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 (5) Utility facilities and infrastructure involving hazardous or volatile gas and/or liquid pipeline development require approval of a Conditional Use Permit. (6) See additional regulations for adult entertainment businesses in Chapter 17.86.Adult-oriented businesses are not permitted west of Haven Avenue. (7) See additional regulations for special regulated uses in Chapter 17.102. (8) See additional regulations for drive-in and drive-through facilities in Chapter 17.90. (9) Not permitted within 300 feet of residentially zoned property. (10) See additional regulations for wind energy systems in Chapter 17.76. (11) Family Day Care Home—Large requires approval of a Large Family Day Care Permit,not a Conditional Use Permit. (12) "Wholesale,SteFage and DistFibut on Medium"'snNot permitted on any parcel that is located within,or partly within,five hundred(500)feet of the Foothill Boulevard right-of-way. (13) Permitted in Industrial Park and General Industrial zoning districts when proposed in conjunction with"Commercial(Repurposing)—Industrial'. (14) Massage establishment permit required.See additional regulations for massage establishments in chapter 5.18. (16) A short-term rental must be a single family residence in zoning districts other than VL,L,and LM.See additional regulations for short-term rentals in Chapter 8.34. (17)Maximum building gross floor area for all industrial uses is 450,000 square feet.A master plan is required for all industrial buildings larger than 450,000 square feet in gross floor area.See footnote 1 in Table 17.14.060-1 (Approving Authority for Land Use Entitlements). 8 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 ARTICLE III. ZONING DISTRICTS, ALLOWED USES, AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Chapter 17.32 ALLOWED USE DESCRIPTIONS Sections: 17.32.010 Purpose. 17.32.020 Allowed use descriptions. 17.32.030 Agricultural uses permitted or conditionally permitted. 17.32.020 Allowed use descriptions. The following list represents the complete list of allowed uses by land use classification and corresponding descriptions as used in Table 17.30.030-1 (Allowed Land Uses and Permit Requirements by Base Zoning District)and throughout this title. For the purpose of this chapter, it is assumed that the use is the most intensive for traffic and CEQA purposes. Individual use classifications describe one or more uses having similar characteristics, but do not list every use or activity that may appropriately be within the classification. Allowed uses are organized into the following seven use categories as follows: • Residential uses. • Agriculture and animal-related uses. • Recreation, resource preservation, open space, education, and public assembly uses. • Utility, transportation, public facility, and communication uses. • Retail, service, and office uses. • Automobile and vehicle uses. • Industrial, manufacturing, and processing uses. A. Residential uses. 1. Adult day care home. Defined by state law as the provision of nonmedical care to six or fewer adults, including seniors, in the provider's own home,for a period of less than 24 hours at a time. Homes serving more than six adults are included in adult day care facility. 2. Caretaker housing. A residence that is accessory to a site with a nonresidential primary use and that is needed for security, 24-hour care or supervision, or monitoring of facilities, equipment, or other conditions on the site. 3. Dwelling, multi-family. A building designed and intended for occupancy by three or more households living independently of each other, each in a separate dwelling unit, which may be owned individually or by a single landlord (e.g., apartment, apartment house, townhouse, condominium). 4. Dwelling, single-family. A building designed exclusively for occupancy by one household on a single lot. This classification includes manufactured homes (defined in California Health and Safety Code§18007) and model homes for the first sale of homes within the subdivision. 5. Dwelling, two-family. An attached building (e.g., duplex) designed for occupancy by two households living independently of each other, where both dwellings are located on a single lot. For the purposes of this title, this definition also includes halfplexes (two attached units, each with a separate lot). Does not include accessory dwelling units. Pagel PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 6. Emergency shelter.A facility for the temporary shelter and feeding of indigents or disaster victims and operated by a public or nonprofit agency. 7. Family day care home, large. State-licensed facilities that provide nonmedical care and supervision of minor children for periods of less than 24 hours within a single-family or multi- family dwelling.The occupant of the residence provides care and supervision generally for seven to 14 children. As described in the Health and Safety Code, large day care homes may provide services for up to 14 children when specific conditions are met. 8. Family day care home, small. State-licensed facilities that provide nonmedical care and supervision of minor children for periods of less than 24 hours within a single-family or multi- family dwelling. The occupant of the residence provides care and supervision generally to six or fewer children. As described in the California Health and Safety Code, small day care homes for children may provide services for up to eight children when specific conditions are met. 9. Group residential. Shared living quarters without separate kitchen and/or bathroom facilities for each room or unit. This classification includes residential hotels, dormitories, fraternities, sororities, convents, rectories, and private residential clubs but does not include living quarters shared exclusively by a family. This category includes boardinghouses, which are defined as a building other than a hotel or restaurant where meals or lodging or both meals and lodging are provided for compensation for four or more persons. 10. Guest house. A detached structure accessory to a single-family dwelling, accommodating living and/or sleeping quarters, but without kitchen or cooking facilities. 11. Home occupation. The conduct of a business within a dwelling unit or residential site, employing occupants of the dwelling, with the business activity being subordinate to the residential use of the property. Examples include, but are not limited to, accountants and financial advisors, architects, artists, attorneys, offices for construction businesses (no equipment or material storage), and real estate sales. This category includes cottage food uses, consistent with state law. 12. Live-work facility. A structure or portion of a structure: a. That combines a commercial or manufacturing activity allowed in the zone with a residential living space for the owner of the commercial or manufacturing business, or the owner's employee, and that person's household; b. Where the resident owner or employee of the business is responsible for the commercial or manufacturing activity performed; C. Where the commercial or manufacturing activity conducted takes place subject to a valid business license associated with the premises; and d. The commercial or manufacturing activity is secondary to the residential living space. 13. Manufactured home. California Health and Safety Code § 18007 defines a manufactured home as a structure, that meets the following criteria: a. Transportable in one or more sections. b. When in the traveling mode, is eight body feet or more in width, or 40 body feet or more in length, or, when erected on-site, is 320 or more square feet. C. Built on a permanent chassis. d. Designed to be used as a residential dwelling. e. Erected with or without a permanent foundation when connected to the required utilities. f. Includes the plumbing, heating, air conditioning, and electrical systems contained therein. g. This term shall include any structure that meets all the requirements of this paragraph except the size requirements so long as the manufacturer voluntarily files a certification and complies with the standards established under this part. Manufactured home includes Page 2 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 a mobile-home subject to the National Manufactured Housing Construction and Safety Act of 1974 (42 USC section 5401 et seq.). 14. Mobile home park. Consistent with definitions of state law (Health and Safety Code section 18214), a mobile home park is any site that is planned and improved to accommodate two or more mobile homes used for residential purposes, or on which two or more mobile home lots are rented, leased, or held out for rent or lease, or were formerly held out for rent or lease and later converted to a subdivision, cooperative, condominium, or other form of resident ownership, to accommodate mobile homes used for residential purposes. 15. Residential care facility. Consistent with the definitions of state law, a residential care facility provides 24-hour nonmedical care for more than six persons 18 years of age or older, or emancipated minors, with chronic, life-threatening illness in need of personal services, protection, supervision, assistance, guidance, or training essential for sustaining the activities of daily living or for the protection of the individual. This classification includes, but is not limited to, rest homes, residential care facilities for the elderly, adult residential facilities, wards of the juvenile court, and other facilities licensed by the State of California. Convalescent homes, nursing homes, and similar facilities providing medical care are included under the definition of medical services, extended care. When located in the low (L) and low-medium (LM) residential districts, a residential care facility shall maintain a minimum three-acre project area. 16. Residential care home. Consistent with the definitions of state law (Health and Safety Code section 1502), a residential care home is a home that provides 24-hour nonmedical care for six or fewer persons 18 years of age or older, or emancipated minors, with chronic, life-threatening illness in need of personal services, protection, supervision, assistance, guidance, or training essential for sustaining the activities of daily living, or for the protection of the individual. This classification includes rest homes, residential care facilities for the elderly, adult residential facilities, wards of the juvenile court, and other facilities licensed by the State of California. Convalescent homes, nursing homes, and similar facilities providing medical care are included under the definition of"medical services, extended care." 17. Short-term rental. A short-term rental is a dwelling unit, or any portion thereof, that is rented by the host to another party for a period of not more than 30 consecutive days in exchange for any form of monetary or non-monetary consideration, including trade, fee, swap or any other consideration in lieu of cash payment. Hosted stays, un-hosted stays, and vacation rentals are types of short-term rental. Related definitions are available in Section 8.34.010. 18. Single-room occupancy (SRO) facility. Multi-unit housing for very low-income persons that typically consists of a single room and shared bath and also may include a shared common kitchen and common activity area. SROs may be restricted to seniors or be available to persons of all ages. Subsidized versions may be supervised by a government housing agency. 19. Transitional housing. Consistent with Health and Safety Code section 50675.2, transitional housing is defined as buildings configured as rental housing developments, but operated under program requirements that call for the termination of assistance and recirculation of the assisted unit to another eligible program recipient at some predetermined future point in time, which shall be no less than six months. B. Agriculture and animal-related uses. 1. Agricultural uses. This use category includes farms, orchards, vineyards, livestock grazing, and hydroponics, including on-site sales of products grown on site. 2. Animal keeping. Care and maintenance of animals on private property. The listing below provides a distinction between various types of animals related to allowed use provisions in Table 17.30.030-1 (Allowed Land Uses and Permit Requirements by Base Zoning District). This classification is distinct from "animal sales and grooming"and "equestrian facility(commercial or hobby)."Also see Kennel, commercial, which provides for the boarding of animals (e.g., doggie day-care). Page 3 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 a. Domestic pets. Small animals (no larger than the largest breed of dogs) customarily kept as pets within a dwelling unit. This classification includes dogs, cats, fish, and birds (excluding large tropical birds and poultry). b. Exotic animals. Wild animals not customarily confined or cultivated by man for domestic or commercial purposes, but kept as a pet or for display, including wolf-dog hybrids, non- poisonous snakes, reptiles, and large tropical birds (including peacocks). C. Insects. Small arthropod animals confined or cultivated by man for domestic purposes including but not limited to flies, crickets, mosquitoes, beetles, butterflies, and bees. d. Livestock animals. Domesticated animals that may be kept or raised in pens, barns, houses, and pastures for private use. Livestock includes, but is not limited to, cattle, sheep, swine, pot belly pigs, goats, and equine. e. Poultry. Domesticated birds (fowl) customarily kept for eggs or meat. This classification includes chickens, roosters, ducks, geese, turkeys, guinea fowl, and Cornish game hens. 3. Equestrian facility, commercial. Commercial horse, donkey, and mule facilities including horse ranches, boarding stables, riding schools and academies, horse exhibition facilities (for shows or other competitive events), pack stations, and barns,stables, corrals, and paddocks accessory and incidental to these uses. 4. Equestrian facility, hobby. Stables, corrals, and paddocks used by the individual homeowners of corresponding property and their animals. C. Recreation, resource preservation, open space, education, and public assembly uses. 1. Assembly use. A permanent meeting facility for organizations operating on a membership basis for the promotion of the interests of the members, including facilities for business associations; civic, social, and fraternal organizations; labor unions and similar organizations; political organizations; religious organizations; professional membership organizations; and other membership organizations. 2. Cemetery/mausoleum. Land used for the burial of the dead and dedicated for cemetery purposes, including columbariums and mausoleums. Also see Mortuary/funeral home and crematory services. 3. Community center/civic use. Multipurpose meeting and recreational facility typically consisting of one or more meeting or multipurpose rooms, kitchen, and/or outdoor barbecue facilities that are available for use by various groups for such activities as meetings, parties, receptions, dances, etc. 4. Community garden. A privately or publicly owned vacant parcel of land used by the community or a neighborhood for the growing of fruits, vegetables, and culinary herbs for personal consumption and/or to be offered for sale on site or at a local certified farmers' market. 5. Convention center.A large building designed to hold a convention,where individuals and groups gather to promote and share common interests. Convention centers typically offer sufficient floor area to accommodate several thousand attendees. Convention centers typically have at least one auditorium and may also contain concert halls, lecture halls, meeting rooms, and conference rooms. Some large resort-area hotels include a convention center. 6. Golf course%lubhouse. A golf course and accessory facilities and uses including clubhouses with bar and restaurant, locker and shower facilities, driving ranges, "pro shops"for on-site sales of golfing equipment, and golf cart storage and sales facilities. 7. Indoor amusement/entertainment facility. An establishment providing amusement and entertainment services in an indoor facility for a fee or admission charge, including, but not limited to, dance halls, ballrooms, bowling alleys, laser tag, inflatable playgrounds, trampoline parks, escape room venues and electronic game arcades, as primary uses. Four or more electronic games or coin-operated amusements in any establishment, or premises where 50% Page 4 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 or more of the floor area is occupied by amusement devices, are considered an amusement device arcade as described above; three or less machines are not considered a land use separate from the primary use of the site. 8. Indoor fitness and sports facility, large. An establishment predominantly for participant sports and health activities conducted entirely within an enclosed building greater than 2,500 square feet. Typical uses include bowling alleys, billiard parlors, ice/roller skating rinks, indoor racquetball courts, indoor climbing facilities, soccer areas, athletic clubs, and health clubs. This use classification also includes studio-style facilities such as dance/ballet,yoga, martial arts,and fitness studios. 9. Indoor fitness and sports facility, small. An establishment predominantly for participant sports and health activities conducted entirely within an enclosed building less than or equal to 2,500 square feet. Typical uses include studio-style facilities such as dance/ballet, yoga, martial arts, and fitness studios but may also include uses described in "indoor fitness and sports facilities, large" if they are in an enclosed building less than or equal to 2,500 square feet. 10. Library and museum. A public or quasi-public facility including aquariums, arboretums, art exhibitions, botanical gardens, historic sites and exhibits, libraries, museums, and planetariums, which are generally noncommercial in nature. 11. Outdoor commercial recreation. Facility for various outdoor participant sports and types of recreation where a fee is charged for use (e.g., amphitheaters, amusement and theme parks, golf driving ranges, health and athletic club with outdoor facilities, miniature golf courses, skateboard parks, stadiums and coliseums, swim and tennis clubs, water slides, zoos). 12. Park and public plaza. A public park including playgrounds and athletic fields/courts and public plazas and outdoor gathering places for community use. If privately owned and restricted to the public (e.g., require payment of fee), the same facilities are included under the definition of "outdoor commercial recreation." 13. Public safety facility. Facility operated by public agencies including fire stations, other fire prevention and firefighting facilities, and police and sheriff substations and headquarters, including interim incarceration facilities. 14. Resource-related recreation. Facility related to passive recreation in open space areas including bicycle and pedestrian trails, picnic areas, parking areas, and interpretive centers. 15. School, academic (private). Any privately owned and operated elementary school, middle school, secondary school, high school, or other institution providing academic instruction for students from kindergarten through 12th grade. This listing also includes a private school operating under a charterfrom the local school district and not managed directly by the governing body of the public school district(e.g., school board). 16. School, academic (public). Public elementary schools, middle schools, secondary schools, high schools, and any other public school providing academic instruction for students from kindergarten through 12th grade. 17. School, college/university(private). Any privately owned college or university, including medical schools, law schools, and other instruction of higher education, including dorms, offices, facility maintenance yards, offices, and similar supportive functions. 18. School, college/university (public). Public community colleges, colleges, and universities, including dorms, offices, facility maintenance yards, offices, and similar supportive functions. 19. School, specialized education and training. Specialty schools for instructing and training students in a variety of specialized programs, including, but not limited to, computers and electronics training, drama, driver educational, language, music. Includes professional, vocational, and trade schools of a nonindustrial nature (e.g., culinary, cosmetology, arts and media, accounting and finance, health and dental including nursing, legal, psychology, and technology). Page 5 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 20. Theater and auditorium. An indoor facility for public assembly and group entertainment, other than sporting events (e.g., civic theaters, facilities for"live" theater and concerts, exhibition and convention halls, motion picture theaters, auditoriums). Does not include outdoor theaters, concert and similar entertainment facilities, and indoor and outdoor facilities for sporting events; see Outdoor commercial recreation. 21. Tutoring center, large.An indoor facility where instructors teach, coach, or educate students with more than ten instructors and/or students using the facility at any given time. 22. Tutoring center, small. An indoor facility where instructors teach, coach, or educate students with ten or fewer instructors and/or students using the facility at any given time. D. Utility, transportation, public facility, and communication uses. 1. Broadcasting and recording studio. Commercial and public communications uses including radio and television broadcasting and receiving stations and studios, with facilities entirely within buildings. Does not include transmission and receiving apparatus such as antennas and towers. 2. Park and ride facility. A designated area where a vehicle may be left in order for the driver to carpool with other commuters or to ride public transit. 3. Parking facility. A parking lot or parking structure used for parking motor vehicles where the facility is the primary use of the site. Parking structures and lots that are developed in conjunction with another primary use of the site to satisfy the on-site parking requirements for the development are not included in this definition. 4. Transit facility. A maintenance and service center for the vehicles operated in a mass transportation system. Includes buses, taxis, railways, monorail, etc. 5. Utility facility and infrastructure, fixed-base structures. Fixed-base structures and facilities serving as junction points for transferring utility services from one transmission voltage to another or to local distribution and service voltages. These uses include any of the following facilities that are not exempted from land use entitlements by Government Code section 53091: electrical substations and switching stations, natural gas regulating and distribution facilities, public water system wells, treatment plants and storage, telephone switching facilities, wastewater treatment plants, settling ponds, and disposal fields. These uses do not include office or customer service centers(classified in offices)or equipment and material storage yards. 6. Utility facility and infrastructure, pipelines. Pipelines for potable water, reclaimed water, natural gas, and sewage collection and disposal, and facilities for the transmission of electrical energy for sale, including transmission lines for a public utility company. Also includes telephone, telegraph, cable television, and other communications transmission facilities utilizing direct physical conduits. 7. Wind energy system, small. A machine which can convert kinetic energy in wind into a usable form of electrical or mechanical energy intended primarily for on-site consumption, but may transfer excess energy into the electrical grid. E. Retail, service, and office uses. 1. Adult day care facility. State-licensed facility that provides nonmedical care and supervision for more than six adults for periods of less than 24 hours, with no overnight stays. 2. Adult-oriented business. a. Adult bookstore or adult video store.A commercial establishment which has as a significant or substantial portion of its stock-in-trade or derives a significant or substantial portion of its revenues or devotes a significant or substantial portion of its interior business or advertising to the sale, rental for any form of consideration, of any one or more of the following: i. Books, magazines, periodicals, or other printed matter or photographs, films, motion pictures, videocassette tapes, digital video discs, slides, tapes, records, compact Page 6 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 discs, or other forms of visual or audio representations which are characterized by an emphasis upon the depiction or description of specified sexual activities or specified anatomical areas. ii. Instruments, devices, or paraphernalia which are designed for use or marketed primarily for stimulation of human genital organs or for sadomasochistic use or abuse of themselves or others. b. Adult cabaret. A nightclub, theater, concert hall, auditorium, bar, or other similar establishment that regularly features live or media presentations of performances by topless or bottomless dancers, go-go dancers, exotic dancers, strippers, or similar entertainers where such performances are distinguished or characterized by an emphasis on specified sexual activities or specified anatomical areas. C. Adult motel. A motel, hotel or similar commercial establishment which: i. Offers public accommodations, for any form of consideration,which provides patrons with closed-circuit television transmissions, films, motion pictures, videocassettes, DVDs, CDs, slides, or other photographic reproductions which are characterized by the depiction or description of specified sexual activities or specified anatomical areas and which advertise the availability of this sexually oriented type of material by means of a sign visible from the public right-of-way, or by means of any off-premises advertising including but not limited to, newspapers, magazines, pamphlets or leaflets, radio or television; ii. Offers a sleeping room for rent for a period of time less than ten hours; or iii. Allows a tenant or occupant to sub-rent the sleeping room for a time period of less than ten hours. d. Adult news rack. Any coin-operated machine or device that dispenses material substantially devoted to the depiction of specified sexual activities or specified anatomical areas. e. Adult theater. An enclosed or unenclosed building, to which the public is permitted or invited, used for presenting any form of audio or visual material, and in which a substantial portion of the total presentation time is devoted to the showing of material which is distinguished or characterized by an emphasis on depiction or description of specified sexual activities or specified anatomical areas. f. Adult viewing area.An area in any adult book and/or novelty store, cabaret,theater, motion picture arcade or other adult entertainment business, where a patron or customer would ordinarily be positioned for the purpose of viewing or watching a performance, picture show, or film. g. Bathhouse. An establishment or business that provides the services of baths of all kinds, including all forms and methods of hydrotherapy during which specified anatomical areas are displayed or specified sexual activity occurs. 3. Alcoholic beverage sales. The retail sale of beverages containing alcohol for off-site consumption subject to regulation by the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) as an off-sale establishment. On-site alcoholic beverage sales are included in the definitions for bar/nightclub and restaurant. 4. Ambulance service. Emergency medical care and transportation, including incidental storage and maintenance of vehicles. 5. Animal sales and grooming. Retail sales of domestic and exotic animals, bathing and trimming services, and boarding of said animals for a maximum period of 72 hours conducted entirely within an enclosed building with no outdoor use. Boarding for periods longer than 72 hours is considered a kennel. Page 7 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 6. Art, antique, collectable shop. Retail sales uses including antique shops, art galleries, curio, gift, and souvenir shops, and the sales of collectible items including sports cards and comic books. Stores selling handcrafted items that are produced on the site are defined separately as artisan shops. 7. Artisan shop. A retail store selling art glass, ceramics,jewelry, and other handcrafted items and supplies needed to create finished items, where the facility includes an area for the crafting of the items being sold. 8. Bail bonds. A business providing a bond or obligation on behalf of a prisoner to insure the prisoner's appearance in court at the return of the writ. 9. Banks and financial services. Financial institutions such as banks and trust companies, credit agencies, holding (but not primarily operating) companies, lending and thrift institutions, and investment companies. Freestanding exterior automated teller machines (ATM) are considered an accessory use and not part of this definition. 10. Bar/nightclub. Any bar, cocktail lounge, discotheque, or similar establishment, which may also provide live entertainment (e.g., music and/or dancing, comedy, subject to an entertainment permit) in conjunction with alcoholic beverage sales. These facilities do not include bars that are part of a larger restaurant. Includes bars, taverns, pubs, and similar establishments where any food service is subordinate to the sale of alcoholic beverages. Bars and nightclubs may include outdoor food and beverage areas. 11. Bed and breakfast inn. A residential structure with one family in permanent residence with up to six bedrooms rented for overnight lodging, where meals may be provided subject to applicable health department regulations. A bed and breakfast inn with more than six guest rooms is considered a hotel or motel and is included under the definition of hotels and motels. 12. Building materials store and yard. A retail establishment selling lumber and other large building materials, where most display and sales occur indoors. Includes stores selling to the general public, even if contractor sales account for a major proportion of total sales. Includes incidental retail ready-mix concrete operations, except where excluded by a specific zoning district. Establishments primarily selling electrical, plumbing, heating, and air conditioning equipment and supplies are classified in wholesale, storage, and distribution (heavy, light and medium). Hardware stores are listed in the definition of "retail, general," even if they sell some building materials. Also see Home improvement supply store for smaller specialty stores. 13. Business support services. Establishments primarily within buildings, providing other businesses with services such as maintenance, repair and service, testing, rental, etc. Support services include, but are not limited to: a. Equipment repair services (except vehicle repair, see Vehicle services); b. Commercial art and design (production); C. Computer-related services (rental, repair); d. Copying, quick printing, and blueprinting services (other than those defined as printing and publishing); e. Equipment rental businesses within buildings (rental yards are storage yards); f. Film processing laboratories; g. Heavy equipment repair services where repair occurs on the client site; h. Janitorial services; i. Mail advertising services (reproduction and shipping); j. Mail box services and other"heavy service" business services; k. Outdoor advertising services; and Page 8 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 I. Photocopying and photofinishing. 14. Call center. An office equipped to handle a large volume of calls, especially for taking orders or servicing customers. 15. Card room. A gambling establishment that offers card games for play by the public. 16. Check cashing business. An establishment that, for compensation, engages in the business of cashing checks, warrants, drafts, money orders, or other commercial paper serving a similar purpose. Also includes establishments primarily engaged in cashing payroll or personal checks for a fee or advancing funds on future checks. This classification does not include a state or federally chartered bank, savings association, credit union, or similar financial institution (see Banks and financial services). 17. Child-care facility/center.A facility installed,operated, and maintained for the nonresidential care of children as defined under applicable state licensing requirements for the facility. Such facilities include, but are not limited to, infant centers, preschools, extended day care facilities, or school- age child-care centers as defined in this title. 18. Commercial cannabis activity. Any location providing for the cultivation, possession, manufacture, distribution, processing, storing, laboratory testing, packaging, labeling, transportation, delivery or sale of cannabis and cannabis product for medical, non-medical, or any other purpose and includes the activities of any business licensed by the state or other government entity under Division 10 of the California Business and Professions Code, or any provision of state law that regulates the licensing of cannabis businesses. Commercial cannabis activity does not include the cultivation, possession, storage, manufacturing, or transportation of cannabis by a qualified patient for his or her personal medical use so long as the qualified patient does not provide, donate, sell or distribute cannabis to any other person. Commercial cannabis activity also does not include the cultivation, possession, storage, manufacturing,transportation, donation or provision of cannabis by a primary caregiver, exclusively for the personal medical purposes of no more than five specified qualified patients for whom he or she is the primary caregiver, but who does not receive remuneration for these activities except for compensation in full compliance with California Health and Safety Code section 11362.765. 19. Consignment store. A retail store where goods are placed on consignment, which is the act of placing goods in the hands of another, while still retaining ownership, until the goods are sold. 20. Convenience store. An easy access retail store of 5,000 square feet or less in gross floor area, which carries a range of merchandise oriented to convenience and travelers' shopping needs. These stores may be part of a service station or an independent facility. 21. Crematory services. An establishment providing services involving the care, preparation, and disposition of human and/or animal remains by means of cremation. Uses typically include, but are not limited to, crematories and crematories with embalming services. 22. Drive-in and drive-through sales and service. A use where a customer is permitted or encouraged, either by the design of physical facilities or by the service and/or packaging procedures offered, to be served while remaining seated within an automobile including, but not limited to, drive-through food, financial services, and automatic car washes. 23. Equipment sales and rental. Service establishments with outdoor storage/rental yards, which may offer a wide variety of materials and equipment for rental (e.g., construction equipment). 24. Feed and tack store. A retail store selling animal food and equestrian supplies. 25. Furniture, furnishing, and appliance store. A store engaged primarily in selling the following products and related services, including incidental repair services: draperies, floor coverings, furniture, glass and chinaware, home appliances, home furnishings, home sound systems, interior decorating materials and services, large musical instruments, lawn furniture, movable spas and hot tubs, office furniture, other household electrical and gas appliances, outdoor furniture, refrigerators, stoves, and televisions. Page 9 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 26. Garden center/plant nursery. Establishments providing for the cultivation and sale of ornamental trees, shrubs, and plants, including the sale of garden and landscape materials (packaged and/or bulk sale of unpackaged materials) and equipment. 27. Grocery store/supermarket. A retail business where the majority of the floor area open to the public is occupied by food products packaged for preparation and consumption away from the site of the store. Such uses may include up to ten percent of floor area for alcohol sales. These full-service businesses do not typically have limited hours of operation. 28. Gun sales. A business whose primary use is the sale of firearms, ammunition and related materials. 29. Home improvement supply store. An establishment(retail or wholesale)that sells kitchen, bath, carpeting, and other home-oriented supplies. Other retail uses are permitted if accessory to the primary use. These uses may include an expansive showroom. This use classification is a subcategory of the larger building materials stores and yards use classification and may be combined with or separate from such uses. 30. Hookah shop. Any facility or location whose business operation includes as an outdoor accessory use the smoking of tobacco or other substances through one or more pipes (commonly known as a hookah, waterpipe, shisha, or narghile) designed with a tube passing through an urn of water that cools the smoke as it is drawn through it, including but not limited to establishments known variously as hookah bars, hookah lounges, or hookah cafes. 31. Hotel.A facility with guest rooms or suites rented to the general public for transient lodging (less than 30 days). Hotels provide access to most guest rooms from an interior walkway and typically include a variety of services in addition to lodging, for example, restaurants, meeting facilities, personal services, etc.A hotel also includes accessory guest facilities such as swimming pools, tennis courts, indoor athletic facilities, accessory retail uses, etc. 32. Internet cafe.A cafe whose customers sit at computer terminals or bring portable computers and log on to the Internet while they eat and drink. 33. Kennel, commercial.A facility that provides boarding of animals as the primary use of the facility. May also include daytime boarding and activity for animals(e.g., "doggie day-care")and ancillary grooming facilities. Also see Animal sales and grooming. 34. Liquor store. A retail establishment which has 50% or more of the shelving or gross floor area devoted to the public display and sale of alcoholic beverages for off-site consumption. 35. Maintenance and repair, small equipment. Establishments providing on-site repair and accessory sales of supplies for appliances, office machines, home electronic/mechanical equipment, bicycles, tools, or garden equipment, conducted entirely within an enclosed building. Does not include maintenance and repair of vehicles. 36. Massage establishment. Any establishment where customers can receive a massage either as a primary or accessory function and where all massage therapists and practitioners are certified by the California Massage Therapy Council. 37. Medical services, extended care. Residential facilities providing nursing and health-related care as a primary use with inpatient beds, such as board and care homes, convalescent and rest homes, extended care facilities, and skilled nursing facilities. Long-term personal care facilities that do not emphasize medical treatment are included under Residential care home. 38. Medical services, general. Facility primarily engaged in providing outpatient medical, mental health, surgical, and other personal health services, but which is separate from hospitals, including medical and dental laboratories, medical, dental, and psychiatric offices, outpatient care facilities, and other allied health services. Counseling services by other than medical doctors or psychiatrists are included under Office, business and professional. Page 10 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 39. Medical services, hospitals. Hospitals and similar facilities engaged primarily in providing diagnostic services and extensive medical treatment, including surgical and other hospital services.These establishments have an organized medical staff, inpatient beds, and equipment and facilities to provide complete health care. May include on-site accessory clinics and laboratories, accessory retail uses (see the separate definition of "retail, accessory"), and emergency heliports. 40. Mobile hot food truck. Any vehicle, as defined in Vehicle Code section 670, which is equipped and used for retail sales of prepared prepackaged or unprepared unpackaged food or foodstuffs of any kind. For the purposes of this section, a mobile food vehicle shall also include any trailer or wagon equipped and used as described in this paragraph and pulled by a vehicle. 41. Mortuary/funeral home. A funeral home and parlor, where the deceased are prepared for burial or cremation and funeral services may be conducted. This use does not include crematorium, which is a separate use classification. 42. Office, accessory.An office that is incidental and accessory to another business or sales activity that is the primary use (part of the same tenant space or integrated development). The qualification criteria for this definition is that the floor area of the accessory office use shall not exceed 50% of the total net habitable or leasable floor area of the tenant space for a single-use development or the combined floor area of an integrated development for a mixed-use project. 43. Office, business and professional. This use listing includes offices of administrative businesses providing direct services to consumers (e.g., insurance companies, utility companies), government agency and service facilities (e.g., post office, civic center), professional offices (e.g., accounting, attorneys, public relations), and offices engaged in the production of intellectual property (e.g., advertising, architecture, computer programming). This use does not include medical offices (see Medical services, general); temporary offices, or offices that are incidental and accessory to another business or sales activity that is the primary use(see Office, accessory). Outdoor storage of materials is prohibited. 44. Pawnshop. Any room, store, building, or other place in which the business of pawn brokering, or the business of lending money upon personal property, pawns, or pledges, or the business of purchasing articles from vendors or their assignees at prices agreed upon at or before the time of such purchase, is engaged in, carried on, or conducted. 45. Personal services. Establishments providing nonmedical services as a primary use, including, but not limited to, barber and beauty shops (including permanent makeup), weight loss clinics, day spas, spiritualist reading or astrology forecasting, clothing rental, dry cleaning pickup stores with limited equipment, home electronics and small appliance repair, laundromats (self-service laundries), shoe repair shops, and tailors. These uses may also include accessory retail sales of products related to the services provided. This use classification does not include massage or tattoo establishments, which are separately classified herein. 46. Restaurant. A retail business selling food and beverages prepared and/or served on the site,for on- or off-premises consumption. Includes eating establishments where customers are served from a walk-up ordering counter for either on- or off-premises consumption and establishments where most customers are served food at tables for on-premises consumption, but may include providing food for take-out. Also includes coffee houses and accessory cafeterias as part of office and industrial uses. Restaurants are divided into three categories as follows: a. Restaurant, no liquor service. Restaurants that do not serve liquor, including fast food establishments. b. Restaurant, beer and wine. Restaurants with liquor services limited to beer and wine for on-site consumption. May also include the brewing of beer as part of a brewpub or mi^„„ micro-brewery. Page 11 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 C. Restaurant, full liquor service. Restaurants with a full range of liquor service, including beer, wine, and distilled spirits, all for on-site consumption. 47. Retail, accessory. The retail sales of various products and services (including food service) in a subtenant store, space, or other clearly defined/dedicated area that is located within a building occupied by a primary tenant such as a health care facility, hotel, office building, or department store, supermarket, or warehouse store. These uses include, but are not limited to: a. Pharmacies, gift shops, and food services within a health care facility; b. Travel services, convenience stores, and food services within a hotel; C. Food services within an office building; and d. Food services and banking within a department store, supermarket, or warehouse store. The floor area of the subtenant store/unit, space, or other clearly defined/dedicated area occupied by the retail, accessory use shall not exceed 25%of the gross floor area of the primary tenant. 48. Retail, general. Stores and shops selling single and multiple lines of merchandise. These stores and lines of merchandise include, but are not limited to, bakeries(all production in support of on- site sales), clothing and accessories, collectibles, department stores, drug and discount stores, dry goods, fabrics and sewing supplies, florists and houseplant stores (indoor sales, only; outdoor sales are plant nurseries and included in the definition of"garden center/plant nursery"), general stores, gift shops, hardware, hobby materials, musical instruments, parts and accessories, newsstands, pet supplies specialty shops, sporting goods and equipment, stationery, and variety stores. 49. Retail, warehouse club. Retail stores that emphasize the packaging and sale of products in large quantities or volumes, some at discounted prices. Sites and buildings are usually large and industrial in character. Patrons may be required to pay membership fees. 50. Secondhand dealer. Any business where the primary or ancillary use includes buying, selling, trading, accepting for sale on consignment, accepting for auctioning, or auctioning secondhand tangible personal property such as "cash for gold." This use classification does not include a "coin dealer" or participants at gun shows or events, pawnshops or secondhand stores. 51. Shooting range. An establishment in which the primary use is an enclosed firing range with targets for rifle or handgun practice,training,or both.The establishment may include an ancillary retail space for a business that is engaged in the sale, transfer, exchange, leasing or vending of firearms, ammunition and/or related materials. The ancillary retail component may not exceed 25% of the gross floor area and may not engage in businesses related to the operation of pawnshops, secondhand stores or thrift stores as defined in this title. 52. Smoke shop. An establishment that either devotes more than 15% of its total floor area to smoking, drug, and/or tobacco paraphernalia or devotes more than a two-foot by four-foot (two feet in depth maximum) section of shelf space for display for sale of smoking, drug, and/or tobacco paraphernalia. 53. Specialty food store.A store selling specialty food ingredients,which typically preserve,emulsify, color, help process, and in some cases add an extra health dimension to produced food. 54. Tattoo shop.Any establishment that engages in the business of tattooing and/or branding human beings. 55. Thrift store. A retail establishment selling secondhand goods donated by members of the public. 56. Veterinary facility. Veterinary facility that is primarily enclosed, containing only enough cage arrangements as necessary to provide services for domestic and exotic animals requiring acute medical or surgical care with accessory outdoor use that provides long-term medical care. Grooming and boarding of animals is allowed only if accessory to the facility use. Page 12 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 F. Automobile and vehicle uses. dismaRtliRg OF WFeGkiRg A-f auteme-hiles n-.r ether me-ter vehicles, and/or the storage or kee. for sale of parts and equipment resulting from such dismantling or wrecking. includes the re ale r.f Wool and used vehicles orir7 used vohirlo parts-. 2. Auto and vehicle sales and rental. Retail establishments selling and/or renting automobiles, trucks, and vans. Includes the sales and rental of mobile homes, recreational vehicles, and boats. May also include repair shops and the sales of parts and accessories, incidental to vehicle dealerships. Does not include the sale of auto parts/accessories separate from a vehicle dealership (see Auto parts sales), bicycle and moped sales (see Retail, general), tire recapping establishments (see Vehicle services, major), businesses dealing exclusively in used parts (see Recycling facility, scrap and dismantling), or service station, all of which are separately defined. 3. Auto and vehicle sales, autobroker. Establishments providing the service of arranging, negotiating, assisting or effectuating, for a fee or compensation, the purchase of a new or used vehicle, not owned by the broker for a person(s). This use, consistent with the licensing guidelines from the California Department of Motor Vehicles does not allow for the storage or display of vehicles on site. 4. Auto and vehicle sales, wholesale. Wholesale establishments selling new and used vehicles to licensed commercial auto dealers. This use, consistent with the licensing guidelines from the California Department of Motor Vehicles does not allow for the storage or display of vehicles on site. 5. Auto and vehicle storage. Facilities for the storage of operative and inoperative vehicles for limited periods of time. Includes, but is not limited to, storage of parking tow-aways, impound yards, fleet yards and storage lots for automobiles (excluding recreational vehicles), trucks, and buses. Does not include retail sales (see Auto and vehicle sales, wholesale). 6. Auto parts sales. Stores that sell new automobile parts, tires, and accessories. May also include minor parts installation (see Vehicle services). Does not include tire recapping establishments, which are found under Vehicle services, major, or businesses dealing exclusively in used parts, which are included under Auto and vehicle sales, wholesale. 7. Car washing and detailing. Permanent, drive-through, self-service, and/or attended car washing establishments, including fully mechanized facilities. May include detailing services. Temporary car washes (e.g., fundraising activities generally conducted at a service station or other automotive-related business, where volunteers wash vehicles by hand and the duration of the event is limited to one day) are not part of this use classification. 8. Recreational vehicle storage. Facilities for the storage of recreational vehicles for limited periods of time. 9. Service station. A retail business selling gasoline or other motor vehicle fuels. May include a convenience store. Vehicle services which are incidental to fuel services are included under Vehicle services, minor. 10. Vehicle services, major. The repair, alteration, restoration, towing, painting, or finishing of automobiles, trucks, recreational vehicles, boats, and other vehicles as a primary use, including the incidental wholesale and retail sale of vehicle parts as an accessory use. This use includes major engine and/or transmission repair and bodywork-repair facilities dealing with entire vehicles; such establishments typically provide towing, collision repair, other bodywork, and painting services and may also include tire recapping establishments. 11. Vehicle services, minor. Minor facilities specialize in limited aspects of repair and maintenance (e.g., muffler and radiator shops, quick-lube, smog check, and tires). Does not include repair shops that are part of a vehicle dealership on the same site (see Auto and vehicle sales) or Page 13 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 automobile dismantling yards, which are included under Recycling facility, scrap and dismantling. G. Industrial, manufacturing, and processing uses. 1. Commercial (secondary/accessory)—Industrial. On-site, retail sales of products within an industrial building (the subject building) for walk-in customers and/or will call customers who order products via the internet/telephone or at a separate location such as a retail store. This use is secondary/accessory to the primary industrial use(s) that occur on-site and/or within the subject building, such as manufacturing, wholesale, storage, and distribution. The products available for retail sale shall be limited to products that are manufactured on-site or within the subject building, that are primarily sold on a wholesale basis, and/or are stored in, and/or distributed from, the subject building. Such products include, but are not limited to: a. Personal/home electronic equipment and accessories; b. Home improvement materials (tile, flooring, carpet, wall covering, etc.); and C. Automotive accessories (wheels, tires, engine components, etc.). This classification allows, but does not require, physical retail and/or display/showroom space within the subject building. If such space is proposed/required, then the floor area used for that purpose shall only occupy the floor area that was originally designated for the office of the subject building, or 25 percent of the gross floor area of the subject building,whichever is less, and shall be subject to the parking requirements for retail uses as described in Table 17.64.050-1 — Parking Requirements by Land Use. Use of, and/or expansion into, areas of the building previously designated for storage, warehousing, or manufacturing is only permitted if it is demonstrated that the number of parking stalls that exist on-site for the overall subject building complies with the parking requirements described in Table 17.64.050-1. A use not permitted to operate as a principal use, such as a marijuana dispensary, is not permitted within this land use classification. A use that requires a conditional use permit, entertainment permit, or adult entertainment permit in order to operate as a principal use is subject to the same permitting requirements within this land use classification. 2. Commercial(re-purposing)—Industrial. A set of multiple commercial uses operating together as subtenants in a building that was originally designed for a single industrial tenant such as a warehouse, or a single commercial tenant such as a department store. This land use classification applies only to commercial uses that, individually, could not utilize the entire floor space of the subject building and, therefore,would not operate as the sole, primary tenant of the building.This classification does not apply to single tenants/uses that could utilize the entire floor space of the subject building. Characteristics of this land use classification include, but are not limited to: a. An open floor plan with tenant demising walls that do not extend to the ceiling; b. Exterior wall signs that only provide identification of the subject building; C. Common, non-exclusive floor area within the interior of the building, and the exterior in the vicinity of the building, for use by the customers of all tenants; d. Tenant spaces with no direct access to the exterior of the building; and e. Shared parking. All proposals for re-purposing buildings shall require the submittal of a conditional use permit for review and approval by the planning director, and the submittal of a parking study prepared by a qualified traffic/parking engineer for review and acceptance by the director of engineering services/city engineer and planning director. With the exception of specific uses identified in Table 17.30.030-1, a use that is not permitted to operate as a principal use, such as a marijuana dispensary, is not permitted within this land use classification. A use that requires a conditional Page 14 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 use permit, entertainment permit, or adult entertainment permit in order to operate as a principal use is subject to the same permitting requirements within this land use classification. 3. E-Commerce Distribution. Activities that involve the buying, selling, and distribution of products and associated services over the internet or through mobile applications. Products are transported using freight trucks and stored in warehouses or fulfillment centers to then be distributed to designated shipping locations using delivery trucks. Includes the following categories of e-commerce distribution: a. Distribution/Fulfillment Center. A fulfillment center or similar use's primary purpose is storage and distribution of e-commerce products to consumers or end-users, either directly or through a parcel hub. These facilities shall have a minimum gross floor area of 200,000 square feet and a minimum ceiling height of 24 feet. b. Parcel Sorting Facilities. An establishment for sorting and/or re-distribution of parcels or products from distribution/fulfillment centers to a parcel hub via intramodal transit truck--to--truck. c. Parcel Hub. A "last mile" facility or similar establishment for the processing and/or re- distribution of parcels or products.A parcel hub's primary function is moving a shipment from one mode of transport to another for delivery directly to consumers or end-users. 1) Parcel Hub, Large. A parcel hub facility with a minimum gross floor area over 130,000 square feet. 2) Parcel Hub, Small. A parcel hub facility with less than 130,000 square feet in gross floor area. 4. Food processing/manufacturing. Activities include methods of turning fresh foods into food products through various processes including, for example, washing, chopping, pasteurizing, freezing, fermenting, packaging, and cooking. IFUef StOr-age and chstribution. A large scale facility where fuel (such as propane and gasoline) is stored and distributed without retail sale 5. Lumber Yard. Activities include the storage, sale, and display of lumber, wood, and building construction products. Lumber and wood products may be stored outside or within a structure. On-site milling and planing of wood is prohibited. 6. Maker Space. Activities typically include, but are not limited to on-site, small-scale production of tangible goods including assembly of completely hand-fabricated parts or hand-fabrication of custom or craft goods not for mass production. Examples of maker space uses include ceramic studios, fabrics, inlays, needlework, weaving, leatherwork woodwork, 3D printing, laser cutting, local food and beverage production, metal or glass work, candle making, or custom jewelry. Goods are predominantly manufactured and fabricated involving only the use of hand tools or domestic-scaled mechanical equipment and kilns not exceeding 20 square feet in size. Retail sales are permitted on site. Accessory retail areas cannot exceed 30 percent of the maker space floor area. 7. Manufacturing, custom. Activities typically include, but are not limited to, manufacturing, processing, assembling, packaging, treatment, or fabrication of custom-made products. These types of business establishments do not utilize raw materials for their finished products, but rather may utilize semi-finished type of manufactured materials for their custom made-to-order products. The finished products from these business establishments are ready for use or consumption and may include on-site wholesale and retail of the goods produced. Examples of custom manufacturing uses include, but are not limited to household furniture, apparel products, electrical instruments signs and advertising displays, and assembly of bicycle parts. The uses do not produce odors, noise, vibration, or particulates that would adversely affect uses in the same structure or on a same site.Where 24-hour on-site surveillance is necessary, a caretaker's residence may be permitted when approved by a minorconditienat use permit. Page 15 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 8. Manufacturing, Green Technology. Activities typically include, but are not limited to, manufacturing, processing, assembling, packaging, treatment, or fabrication of finished made- to-order products utilizing semi-finished manufactured materials rather than raw materials. Examples of preen technology manufacturing uses include, but are not limited to solar panels, wind turbines, geothermal system components, and batteries for electric vehicles/bicycles. The uses do not typically produce odors, noise, vibration, or particulates that would adversely affect uses in the same structure or on a same site. Where 24-hour on-site surveillance is necessary, a caretaker's residence may be permitted with a minor use permit. heavy. AGW4486 typiGally include, but are not limited to, maR6rfaGt61F1Rg-, 4 n this area may have frequent rag! or truck traffic and the transportation of heavy, large scale products. Activities On this area may generate noose, odor, vibration, illumination, or particulates that may be obnoxious or offensive to persons residing On or conducting business On the vicinity. Characteristics of activities permitted within this area may include massive StFUGtures outside of buildings such as cranes, conveyor systems, cooling towers, or unscreened open air storage of large quantities of raw, semi refined, or finished products. Uses typically include, but are not limited to, computer assembly plants, power plants, industrial fabrication facilities, product manufacturing activities, and aggregate or asphalt yards. Where 24 hour on site surveillance 'is necessary, a caretaker's residence may be permitted when approved by a conditional use permit manufacturing, compound;-,-, o-11 material, processing, assembly, packaging, treatment, o fabrication activities which may have frequent ram! or truck traffic or the transportation of heavy, large scale products. Activities in this area may generate noose, 9&F, vibration, illumination, or particulates that may be obnoxious or offensive to persons residing OF GE)RdUGtIRg business in the vicinity. Uses typically utilize raw materials to fabricate serni finished products which include-, but are not limited to, metal fabricating facilities, open welding shops, lumber woodworking facilities, heavy machine shops, chernical storage and distributing, and plastic plants. Not permitted within this area are uses that massive structures outside of buildings such as- cranes or conveyor systems or unscreened open air storage of large quantities of Manufacturing, hea�y, n7i t. Activities typically include, but are not limited to,semi refined or finished prod ctc 9. Manufacturing, light. Activities typically include, but are not limited to, labor-intensive manufacturing, assembly, fabrication, or repair processes which do not involve large container truck traffic or the transport of large-scale bulky products,but may include limited rail traffic. The new product may be finished in that it is ready for use or consumption or it may be semi-finished to become a component for further assembly and packaging. These types of business establishments are customarily directed to the wholesale market, inter-plant transfer, rather than direct sale to the consumer. Such uses may include, but are not limited to, electronic microchip assembly; printing, publishing, and allied industries; food processing and manufacturing; candy and other confectionery products; bottled or canned soft drinks and carbonated water; apparel and other finished products; paperboard containers and boxes; drugs; medical equipment; and small fabricated metal products such as hand tools, general hardware, architectural, and ornamental metal work and toys, amusement, sports, and athletics goods. The activities do not produce odors, noise, vibration, hazardous waste materials, or particulates that would adversely affect other uses in the structure or on the same site. Where 24-hour on-site surveillance is necessary, a caretaker's residence may be permitted when approved by a Genditienalminor use permit. 10. Manufacturing, n7edium. Activities typically include, but are not limited to, manufacturing, compounding of materials, processing, assembly, packaging, treatment or fabrication of materials and products which require frequent large container truck traffic or ram! traffic, or the transport of heavy, bulky iterns. The new products are serni finished to be a component for Page 16 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 further MaRufaGt61FiRg, fabFiGatiGR, and assembly. These types of b6lSiReSS establishMeRts are sale to the dGMGStiG GGRSLJrner. S61Gh uses may ORGlude, but aFe RE)t limited te, GaRRed feed; textile pred6lGtS; fUFRiture and fixtures; GGRVerted paper and paper beaFd predUGtS; plaStiG predUGtS made from PUFGhased rubber, plaStiG, OF FeSiR; fabFiGated metal predyGts made frem Where 24 hour OR Site surveillaRGe 06 ReGessary, a Garetaker's resideRGe may be permitted when o red by o onrli+ionol u permh 11. Microbrewery. A small-scale brewery operation dedicated to the production of specialty beers and producing less than 15,000 barrels(465,000 U.S. gallons) per year.Ancillary on-site tasting and/or retail sales of beers produced on-site for off-site consumption may be permitted when approved by a conditional use permit. 12. Printing and publishing. Establishments engaged in printing by letterpress, lithography, gravure, screen, offset, or electrostatic (xerographic) copying, and other establishments serving the printing trade including bookbinding, typesetting, engraving, photoengraving, and electrotyping. This use also includes establishments that publish newspapers, books, and periodicals, and establishments manufacturing business forms and binding devices. Does not include "quick printing" services or desktop publishing which are included in "business support services." 13. Recycling facility, collection. A recycling facility used for the acceptance by donation, redemption, or purchase of recyclable materials from the public that does not occupy more than 500 square feet. This classification may include a mobile unit, kiosk-type units that may include permanent structures, and unattended containers placed for the donation of recyclable materials.Also includes so-called"reverse vending machines,"an automated mechanical device that accepts one or more types of empty beverage containers including, but not limited to, aluminum cans, glass bottles, and plastic bottles, and issues a cash refund or a redeemable credit slip with value of not less than the container's redemption value as determined by the state. 14. Recycling facility, processing. A recycling facility located in a building or enclosed space and used for the collection and processing of recyclable materials. Processing means the preparation of material for efficient shipment or to an end-user's specifications by such means as baling, briquetting, compacting, flattening, grinding, crushing, mechanical sorting, shredding, cleaning, and remanufacturing. Collection of recycling materials as the sole activity is included in the definition of Recycling facility, collection. 15. Recycling faciliV, scrap and dismantling. Uses engaged On the assembling, breaking up, sorting, temporary storage, and distribution of recyclable or reusable scrap and waste materials. This use does not include landfills or other terminal waste disposal sites. Also see Auto Vehicle Dismantling for related use for automobiles. Collection of recycling materials as the sole activity is included in the definition of Recycling facility, collection 16. Research and development. Indoor facilities for scientific research, and the design, development, and testing of electrical, electronic, magnetic,optical, and mechanical components in advance of product manufacturing, that is not associated with a manufacturing facility on the same site. Includes, but is not limited to, chemical, medical, and biotechnology research and development. Does not include computer software companies (see Office, business and professional), soils and other materials testing laboratories (see Business support services) medical laboratories (see Medical SeFV'GeS, general). 17. Storage, personal storage facility. A structure or group of structures containing generally small, individual, compartmentalized stalls or lockers rented as individual storage spaces and characterized by low parking demand. Page 17 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 18. Storage warehouse. Facility for the storage of furniture, household goods, or other commercial goods of any nature. Includes cold storage. Does not include warehouse, storage, or mini- storage facilities offered for rent or lease to the general public (see Storage, personal storage facility) or warehouse facilities in which the primary purpose of storage is for wholesaling and distribution (see Wholesale, storage and distribution (heavy, medium and light)). 19. Storage yard. The storage of various materials outside of a structure other than fencing, either as an accessory O of use. 20. , warehousing, storage, freight handling, shipping, trucking services and terminals, and storage and wholesaling from the premises of unfinished, raw, or serni refined products requiring further processing, fabrication, or manufacturing. Typical uses include, but are not limited to, trucking forms, and the wholesaling of and agricultural products. Outdoor storage is permitted. , minerals,permitted. 21. Wholesale, storage, and distribution, light. Activities typically include, but are not limited to, wholesaling, storage, and warehousing services and storage and wholesale to retailers from the premises of finished goods and food products. Activities under this classification shall be conducted in enclosed buildings and occupy 50,000 square feet or less of building space. Retail sales from the premises may occur when approved by a conditional use permit. 22. Wholesale, storage, and distribution, medium. Activities typically include, but are not limited to, wholesale, storage, and warehousing services; moving and storage services; storage and wholesaling to retailers from the premises of finished goods and food products; and distribution facilities for large-scale retail firms. Activities under this classification shall be conducted in enclosed buildings and occupy greater than 50,000 square feet of building space. Included are multi-tenant or speculative buildings with over 50,000 square feet of warehouse space. 23. WorWLive. A building or spaces within a building used jointly for commercial and residential purposes where the residential use of the space is secondary or accessory to the primary use as a place of work. Typical types of work include small-scale, custom manufacturing of goods with limited on-site sales. The dedicated work area must be at least twice the size of the residential area with no more than two inhabitants living on the premises. Work/Live uses are typically found in industrial zones and have a maximum gross floor area of 30,000 square feet. Page 18 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 ARTICLE IV. SITE DEVELOPMENT PROVISIONS Chapter 17.38 OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICTS AND OTHER SPECIAL PLANNING AREAS Sections: 17.38.010 Senior Housing Overlay Zoning District. 17.38.020 Equestrian Overlay Zoning District. 17.38.030 Hillside Overlay Zoning District. 17.38.040 Haven Overlay Zoning District. 17.38.050 Industrial Commercial Overlay Zoning District. 17.38.060 Foothill Boulevard Overlay Zoning District. 17.38.070 Etiwanda Heights Neighborhood and Conservation Plan. 17.38.080 Large Warehouse Overlay Zoning District. Section 17.38.080 Large Warehouse Overlay Zoning District A. Purpose. The purpose of the Large Warehouse Overlay Zone is to ensure that large industrial buildings of 450,000 square feet or more are located in areas of the City with adequate public services and infrastructure and away from sensitive receptors who may be impacted by air pollutant emissions, noise, and other impacts generated by the predominant uses in such buildings. B. Applicability. Industrial buildings with a gross floor space of 450,000 square feet or more that are developed after the effective date of the ordinance that codified this section shall be located within the Large Warehouse Overlay Zone. The Large Warehouse Overlay Zone applies to property designated on the zoning map by reference letters "LW" after the reference letter(s) identifying the base zoning district. C. Allowed uses. Permitted uses within the Large Warehouse Overlay Zone are those permitted and conditionally permitted uses within the underlying zoning district. D. Development standards. Development in the Large Warehouse Overlay Zone shall comply with the zoning regulations applicable to the underlying zoning district and any master plan applicable to the subject property. A master plan adopted pursuant to chapter 17.22.020 may also be required for the development of an industrial building located within the Large Warehouse Overlay Zone. PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 ARTICLE IV. SITE DEVELOPMENT PROVISIONS Chapter 17.36 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS BY BASE ZONING DISTRICT Sections: 17.36.010 Development standards for residential zoning districts. 17.36.020 Development standards for mixed use zoning districts. 17.36.030 Development standards for commercial and office zoning districts 17.36.040 Development standards for industrial districts. 17.36.050 Development standards for open space zoning districts. 17.36.040 Development standards for industrial districts. A. Purpose and applicability. The purpose of this section is to establish minimum development standards that are unique to development projects within the Industrial Zoning Districts. Development standards in this section apply to all land designated on the zoning map within an Industrial Zoning District. B. Industrial districts. As identified in chapter 17.26 (Establishment of Zoning Districts), the city includes three Industrial Zoning Districts: Industrial Park (IP), General Industrial (GI), M;Rimum IRgp VHea y IRd6i tFinal (MI/HI), and Heavy i dustrial iun Neo-Industrial (NI), and Industrial Employment (IE). C. Industrial site development standards. General site development standards for Industrial Zoning Districts are listed in Table 17.36.040-1 (Development Standards for Industrial Zoning Districts). These development standards supplement the development standards in article IV(Site Development Provisions)that apply to all zoning districts (e.g., parking, signs, landscaping, and lighting). TABLE 17.36.040-1 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS Development Standard/Zoning District IP GINI AAIIHIIE Lot area (minimum)(') 0.5 ac 0.5 ac 5 ac or 2 ac(2) Lot width (minimum)(3) 100 ft 100 ft 100 ft Min. Setback(ft-)(4) Front yard (and Street Side Yard) See Table 17.36.040-2 Major Arterial and Special Boulevard 45 ft 45 ft 45 ft Secondary 35 ft 35 ft 35 ft Local/Collector 25 ft 25 ft 25 ft Interior Side yard 5 ft(5) 5 ft(5) 5 ft(5) Rear yard 0 ft(5) 0 ft(5) 0 ft(5) Distance Between Buildings Primary buildings Must meet current building code requirements Accessory buildings Must meet current building code requirements 1 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 Max. Building Height f Primary buildings 35 feet at the front setback line(6) Maximum height is :45 f etm 45 ft 45 ft 65 ft Accessory buildings- Detached 4425 ft 4925 ft 4925 ft Accessory buildinqs—Attached Maker Space -- 35 ft 35 ft Floor Area Ratio Latio of building floor area to lot square footage) Floor area ratio 0.4-0.6(8) 50-60%0.4-0.6 nla0.4-0.6(9) Max. Building Footprint(sq. ft.) Primary Building Lpt - 200,000 450,000 Accessory Building-Detached - 5,000 10,000 Accessory Building—Attached Maker Space - 30,000 30,000 Min. Open Space(minimum percentage of open space per parcel or project) Open space/landscape area 15% 10% 10%(2)/5% Performance standards(see chapter 17.66) A BA C/B(2) Table notes: (1) Condominium lots. Condominium lots and lots within an approved master planned development are exempt from required minimum parcel size and dimension requirements. (2) The following applies within 1,000 feet of Arrow Route:minimum 2-acre lot area; 10%minimum landscape area;and the"B"level performance standards(chapter 17.66). (3) Setbacks shall be the minimum required under the city's currently adopted building code. (4) Setback shall be increased to 45 feet when abutting a residential property line or adjacent to Interstate 15. (5) See Table 17.36.040-2 for parcels abutting special boulevards as indicated in Figure 17.36.040-1 (Special Streetscape Requirements). (6) Buildings used for industrial uses that exceed 35 feet in height shall be set back an additional one foot from the front setback line for each one foot of building height up to a maximum setback of 70 feet.The portion of the building used for offices are not subject to this requirement. (7) Heights over 75 feet may be permitted with a conditional use permit. (8) For hotels and motels,the maximum floor area ratio is 1.0(100 percent). (9) Parking structures in the Neo-Industrial (NI) and Industrial Employment 0E)Zoning Districts are exempt from floor area ratio requirements. (10) Conditional use permit approval by the city council is required for all industrial buildings larger than 75,000 square feet in gross floor area.See Section 17.20.060(Conditional use permit).A master plan is required for all industrial buildings Iargerthan 450,000 square feet in gross floor area.See Footnote 1 in Table 17.14.060-1 (Approving Authority for Land Use Entitlements). D. Other miscellaneous industrial development standards. 1. Special streetscape. Future development and redevelopment within industrial areas shall be consistent with the special streetscape standards listed in Table 17.36.040-2 (Streetscape Setback Requirements) and as depicted in Figure 17.36.040-1 (Special Streetscape Requirements). 2 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 TABLE 17.36.040-2 STREETSCAPE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS Street Type Average Depth of Building Setback(2,3,a,6) Parking Setback(5) Landscape(1,2) Major Arterial,Special Boulevards 45 ft 45 ft 25 ft and Interstate 15 Secondary 35 ft 35 ft 20 ft Local/Collector 25 ft 25 ft 15 ft Table notes: (') The average depth shall be uninterrupted from the face of curb, except for sidewalks, pedestrian hardscape, plazas and courtyards,and monument signs. (2) Parcels less than 225 feet in depth from the ultimate curb face on special boulevards are not required to provide an average depth of landscaping or building setback greater than 25 feet or 20%the depth of the property,whichever is greater. (3) As determined from the face of curb. (4) Average depth of landscaping must still be provided. (5) Street frontage walls and fences over 3 feet in height are subject to building setbacks. (6) Setbacks may be increased based on building height.See Table 17.36.040-1. 2. Accessory maker spaces. Accessory maker spaces are required in or adjacent to all new buildings that exceed 200,000 square feet in gross floor area in the Neo-Industrial (NI) and Industrial Employment OE) Zoning Districts, subject to the following standards: a. A minimum gross floor area of 3,000 sq. ft. and a maximum gross floor area of 30,000 square feet. b. Accessory maker spaces shall face main arterial roads adjacent to the site. C. Maker space building frontages shall include either an at-grade loading area or an above- grade loading area on a terraced entry. 3 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 FIGURE 17.36.040-1 SPECIAL STREETSCAPE REQUIREMENTS Streetscape Setback Requirements for Major Arterials and Special Boulevards 45'Minimum 45'AverageDepth 25'Minimum Building Setback of Landscaping Parking Setback t s Streetscape Setback Requirements for Secondary Streets 35'Minimum 35'AverageDepth 20'Minimum Building Setback of Landscaping Parking Setback i' Streetscape Setback Requirements for Local Streets 25'Minimurn 25'AverageDepth 15'Minimum Building Setback of Landscaping Parking Setback .._ ........ r 3. Special building height standards. Building height limits shall not exceed the height limits prescribed in the LA/Ontario International Airport Compatibility Plan. For areas within the High Terrain Zone, the building height limit shall be 70 feet. Buildings or structures greater than 70 feet in height within the High Terrain Zone are subject to the ONT-IAC Project Notification Process and require a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)exception (Obstruction Evaluation - Form 7460). In cases where the LA/Ontario International Airport Compatibility Plan permits heights greater than 70 feet, building height limits shall be limited to maximum of height of 75 feet, unless a conditional use permit is granted permitting heights greater than 75 feet. 4 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 4. Special height exceptions for ancillary equipment. Within Mini um lw,„aGyHeayy industrial (Ml l=ll) a„d Heavy l„dustr;al (HI) n,s+r;Gts the Industrial Employment (IE)Zoning District, height exceptions may be granted for ancillary equipment with special design and landscape considerations as follows: a. Maximum 90 feet with approval of a minor exception with the additional findings that the ancillary equipment is designed in a manner that integrates well within the subject site and existing and/or proposed landscaping will buffer the views of ancillary equipment from designated view corridors. b. Maximum 120 feet with approval of a conditional use permit with the additional findings that the ancillary equipment is designed in a manner that integrates well within the subject site and existing and/or proposed landscaping will buffer the views of ancillary equipment from designated view corridors. 5. Interim uses. Certain industrial properties may be vacant without any immediate plans for site development. In these instances, the properties may be utilized for a defined list of interim uses for a limited time period as specified hereinbelow. The uses permitted within this section are supplemental to the uses listed in chapter 17.30 (Allowed Land Uses by Base Zoning District). a. Permitted interim uses include agricultural crops, roadside stands, farmers market, community garden, and private parks and picnic areas. b GenditiGRal u Minor use permit required. Prior to the establishment of an interim use, a enditonarminor use permit shall be approved. C. Time period. The maximum time period for an interim use is five years. d. Conditions. At a minimum, the conditions should include an agreement between the city and the applicant stipulating timing, installation of permanent improvements and buildings, and/or restoration of the site to its original condition. At the end of five years, the use shall be removed or the site developed in accordance with the full development regulations of any adopted plan. 6. Interim use standards.The following standards shall apply in all industrial areas for interim uses: a. The minimum streetscape and parking setback requirement shall be contiguous with the ultimate right-of-way line, but in no case less than ten feet. b There shall be No minimum landscape coverage requirements are required, except where necessary for screening purposes as determined by the planning director. C. All parking and storage areas shall be paved with slag, crushed aggregate, asphaltic concrete, concrete, or similar materials. The location, number, and design of the parking and storage areas shall be in accordance with Code requirements. d. All parking and storage areas, and other interim uses which require screening as determined by the planning director, shall be screened from public view through a combination of landscaping and fencing. Fencing may include a six-foot chain-link fence with slats, masonry or concrete,wood, or decorative metal. Screening must be maintained in good condition at all times. e. Landscaping required for screening purposes shall include 15-gallon trees and five-gallon shrubs to provide a dense landscape buffer to afford maximum screening from the public view, satisfactory to the planning director. 7. Rail service. If rail service is needed for properties which adjoin existing or proposed lead or spur lines,the following rail service access standards, unless modified by the rail service provider or the public utilities commission, shall apply: Rail crossings and any spur construction must be approved by the rail service provider and the public utilities commission. The following rail service standards, unless modified by the railroad or the public utilities commission, shall apply: a. Minimum easement width for a lead line, single track shall be 32 feet. b. Minimum easement width for a double rail track shall be 41 feet. 5 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 C. The minimum radius of curvature for a track shall be 180 feet. d. The maximum gradient along spur tracks shall not exceed two percent. e. Dock height shall be no less than 4.5 feet above the top of the spur track. f. Road crossings at grade must be avoided wherever possible. g. Spur trackage is not permitted along any frontage between a building and a public right-of- way and must be confined to the side or rear yard area of the building that the rail spur serves. h. Rail loading areas shall be screened from view from the public right-of-way by a wall that matches the architecture, materials, colors, etc. of the building that the rail spur serves. i. Spur tracks shall not encroach onto/across any required parking stalls. Spur tracks shall not encroach across drive aisles for automobile / heavy truck and/or emergency vehicle access except when it is necessary to connect the main rail line with the rail loading area. j. Lot divisions and building layouts for properties which adjoin existing or proposed lead and spur lines shall be done in a manner to ensure full potential of future rail access and use and should not preclude rail access to other properties adjacent to such rail lines. Subdivisions, which could reduce a property's ability to accommodate potential rail served developments, may not be authorized. k. Building design shall include rail service features to ensure the potential use of available spur lines. I. Finished floor elevations and dock height door or "kick out" wall panels shall be provided in all properties abutting rail lines. m. The above-referenced rail service development standards may be amended or deleted on a site-by-site basis during the development review process. The following must be determined by the planning commission in order to authorize any modification of the rail service standard: i. That the installation of a lead or spur track cannot be accomplished due to physical constraints on or adjacent to the project site; and ii. Other existing or potential rail service properties will not be negatively affected in their ability to accommodate rail service activity as a result of modifications to the standards. 8. Equipment screening. The following eguip;,eRt screening standards shall apply to equipment such as HVAC units, storage tanks, ducting, etc.: a. All roof, wall, and ground mounted equipment shall be screened and not visible from the public right-of-way within the lRd striol Dort(ID)and GeRerol Industrial (GI)ZeRing diStriGtS the Neo-Industrial (NI)Zoning District. b. Wherever possible, all roof, wall and ground mounted equipment shall be screened 494;4 all sodesand not visible from the public right-of-way within the Minimum I,,,r,aGtiHeavy Industrial (MI HI) and Heavy Industrial (HI) zoning distrinto Industrial Employment (IE) Zoning District. C. The visibility of any equipment from the public right-of-way shall be determined by"line-of- sight" and measured from a point that is 6 feet above the finished surface of the centerline of the public right-of-way, e.g. street. d. All screening of roof mounted equipment shall be accomplished with a parapet wall that is consistent and compatible with the architecture, materials, colors, etc. of the building_ Where a parapet wall is not possible, then a screen shall be provided to enclose the roof mounted equipment. This enclosure is exempt from the building height requirement established in Table 17.36.040-1 (Development Standards for Industrial Zoning Districts). Where roof mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork projects less than 18 inches 6 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 above the roof or roof parapet it shall be painted consistent with the color scheme of the building. 9. Design standards. The following design standards apply to all new developments in the Neo- Industrial (NI) and Industrial Employment OE)Zoning Districts: a. Site design standards i. General site design • Site elements such as buildings, parking areas, driveways, sidewalks, and outdoor recreational spaces must be arranged to emphasize the aesthetically pleasing components of the site (e.g., landscaping and the superior architectural design of office building element (refer to b. (Building design standards)) and to screen less attractive elements (e.g., service facilities, loading docks, outdoor storage, equipment areas, and refuse enclosures) through the proper placement and design of buildings, screen walls, and landscaping. • Sites shall have internal sidewalks that connect to sidewalks along public streets to create pedestrian connections. • Loading dock areas shall be located and designed so that they do not face toward (and are not visible from) any adjacent public right-of-way such as a street. These areas shall be screened with walls or fences and landscaped (Insert cross reference to applicable landscaping/screening sections). • All refuse, storage, and equipment areas placed outside of a building shall be screened from adjacent public rights-of-way and uses. ii. Block Network Parameters for Public Streets. • Intersection spacing along arterial edges shall be between 1/8 mile and '/4 mile with at least one mid-block intersection between intersecting arterials and rail, flood control, utility or freeway corridors. • Intersection spacing inside arterial/arterial blocks bounded by arterials shall be a minimum of 200 feet and a maximum of 1,320 feet. • Buildings greater than 400,000 sq.ft. in size shall have public streets on at least 3 sides. • A minimum of 1 public street shall run parallel with and within 500 feet of rail (excluding spurs), flood control, utility, or freeway corridors. The parallel street shall run through the block. Street crossings at intersecting corridors shall be established on a case-by-case basis based on feasibility and needs by the City Engineer. • Intersections along arterials shall be aligned with existing/proposed intersections on the opposite side of the arterial where possible and meet minimum design standards for offsets or clearance from adjacent corridors as required by the City Engineer. • Two distinct points of connection shall be provided through an internal block network to the arterial street network for every industrial parcel. iii. Parking location and design • Surface parking shall be located to the side or to the rear of principle buildings to the greatest extent feasible. • Surface parking stalls for employees and quests&hallmay incorporate shade structures that are capable of supporting solar/photovoltaic array systems with a minimum clearance height of 12 feet. A minimum of 50 percent of the required parking stalls shall include these shade structures for this purpose. • The shade structures shall not encroach into the required access lanes. 7 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 • The applicable tree and landscaping standards are not required in the sections of the parking areas where solar arrays systems are placed. See Section 17.56.060.N.1.b (Exception for solar collectors). • All new development within the Neo-Industrial (NI) and Industrial Employment (IE) Zoning Districts requires a Parking management plan, see Section 17.64.070 (Parking management plan). iv. Open space • An outdoor seating/break area is required for every proposed and potential office area of a building • On-site open space areas shall contain an outdoor seating/break area with seating designed to allow a variety of sitting environments. • Outdoor seating areas shall provide shade under a suitable structure and wind protection using landscaping or transparent screening structures. • Outdoor seating areas shall be easily accessed from the lobby or interior break rooms and placed at the corner of the building or along the side of a building facing a public street. • Outdoor seating areas are included within the minimum open space requirement in Table 17.36.040-1 (Development Standards for Industrial Zoning Districts). v. Landscaping, screening, and street trees • All new industrial developments shall adhere to the standards in Chapter 17.56 (Landscaping standards) in addition to the standards provided below. In the event of a conflict, the most restrictive standard shall apply. • Landscaping shall be provided along the public streets and sidewalks to define the street edge, buffer pedestrians from vehicles, and provide shade. • All new trees planted within the public right-of-way or to screen the front, side or rear of a building, and to screen the building from Interstate 15 shall be a minimum 24-inch box and planted 25—30 feet apart. • Trees shall be selected and planted to provide shade for walkways, outdoor seating areas, parking areas etc. and for their ability for filtering particulate matter and other pollutants from the air. • Walls and fences used to provide screening of loading facilities, outdoor trash receptacles, utility equipment, etc. must be solid and designed with materials and finishes that are consistent with and complimentary to the design of the primary buildings. Fences used for security purposes or around parking areas shall consist of wrought iron, tubular steel, or similar material. The use of chain-link is prohibited. Landscape materials as required in accordance with Chapter 17.56 (Landscaping Standards) may compliment the requirements for screening, but landscaping without a screen wall or fence does not meet the minimum screening requirement of this section. • When redevelopment occurs, new public streets as required by the city engineer shall be designed in compliance with the city's Complete Streets policies, public sidewalks along the frontage of the property being developed are required. • All new sidewalks shall be a minimum of 6 feet or wider as designated by the cites engineer based on existing or planned adjacent land uses to ensure compliance with the city's Complete Streets policies, separated from the curb by a planted parkway, and installed parallel to the property line or curb. Meandering sidewalks along any frontage are prohibited. 8 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 b. Building design standards i. Building orientation and placement. • Buildings shall have articulated and transparent frontages along a minimum of 50 feet on both sides of the building that define the corner. • Office and administration buildings associated with an industrial use shall be placed at the corner of a building at the intersection of two public streets and/or a main arterial road. The building corner shall have a prominent, vertical structural element (e.g. a tower)that protects no more than 15 feet above the maximum allowable height of the building and that occupies a maximum of 5 percent of the building roof area. In addition, raised parapets with enhanced decorative treatment such as cornices or crenellations are permitted not to exceed 8 feet above the maximum allowable height of the building. If an office or administration building is located at the intersection of two arterial streets the height of the tower or raised parapets may be increased an additional 25 percent. • The primary entrance to accessory maker spaces and an office/administration building must face the corner or an adjacent main arterial road. • Where feasible, equipment, electrical, and service rooms shall be placed within the footprint of the building, i.e. inside the building, or screened so that it is not visible from the public right-of-way. ii. Building facade articulation. • Primary building entries shall be readily identifiable and well-defined using projections, recesses, columns, roof structures, or other design elements. • All elevations of a building's facade shall include modulation and articulation of the wall plane and roof line, proportionate to the height and length of the building. Exceptions to this requirement are the wall planes at the dock areas and the rear elevation of the building. • All elevations of a building's facade must have vertical or horizontal variations in color, texture, material, and ornamentation. • The office component of building facades must contain offset or recessed structural bays, and protecting elements such as colonnades or bay windows. • Shade elements such as canopies, awnings, arcades, and overhangs shall be provided over all windows, and at all pedestrian entry points, along the front elevation, any street-facing elevation, and office portions of the building. • Roofs shall be designed as an integral component of building form, mass, and facade, particularly along the front and office portions of the building. Building form shall be enhanced by sloped or offset roof planes, eave heights, and rooflines. iii. Materials and detailing • The front and office portions of buildings must be constructed of high-quality materials, including, but not limited to, brick, stone, textured cast stone, tinted masonry units, concrete, glass, and metal siding. • The following materials are prohibited along the front and office portions of the building: 1. Unadorned, plain or painted concrete block or panels; 2. Reflective glass; and 3. Vinyl, fiberglass, asphalt, or fiberboard siding. 9 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 • Where feasible, the industrial/warehousing portion of the building must include a variety of materials and architectural elements to break up the linear planes of these building. Ideally, the building's design and architecture must express the nature of the industrial activity within, in keeping with the other requirements of this section and while respecting the functionality of the use within the building. iv. Door and window openings • For office portions of principle buildings, window and door openings must comprise at least 60 percent of the total area of exterior walls facing a public street. • These windows must be clear or translucent to improve visibility, add visual interest, and allow light into interior spaces. v. Lighting • Decorative lighting fixtures shall be provided with a minimum 1-foot candle illumination level above that of surrounding parking lots at vehicle driveways and driveway entry/exits, pedestrian pathways, plazas and courtyards, and other activity areas. • Building and landscape accent up-lighting shall be incorporated into the lighting plan for the development site, with a focus along the front and office portions of the building. • All exterior lighting shall be shielded to prevent glare and light trespass onto adjacent properties and streets. • Lighting systems shall be architecturally compatible with surrounding buildings to express the unique character of the area. 10 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 ARTICLE IV. SITE DEVELOPMENT PROVISIONS Chapter 17.48 FENCES, WALLS,AND SCREENING Sections: 17.48.010 Purpose. 17.48.020 Permit requirements and exemptions. 17.48.030 Location and height requirements. 17.48.040 Materials and maintenance. 17.48.050 Requirements by land use type. 17.48.040 Materials and maintenance. A. Fencing, wall, and screen materials. Fences, walls, and screens shall be constructed of attractive, long-lasting materials and architecturally integrated with the building design and with existing fences/walls on the site. The following limitations apply: 1. Fences and gates approved for screening purposes in residential districts shall be solid wood with steel frames, solid vinyl, tubular steel or wrought iron. Where tubular steel wrought iron is used, it shall be backed by solid or perforated metal sheeting painted to match the fence or gate. In new developments, decorative block walls shall be used. 2. Fences and gates approved for screening purposes in industrial or commercial districts shall be metal, tubular steel, or wrought iron (open fencing shall be backed by solid or perforated metal sheeting painted to match the fence or gate). In the Industrial Zoning Districts the requirements for fences,walls, and screening provided in Section 17.36.040.D.9.a.v(Landscaping, screening, and street trees) shall also apply. 3. Chain-link fences and/or gates are not permitted for screening purposes in any zoning district, (including the Industrial Zoning Districts), including chain-link when backed with wood or plastic slats, solid plastic sheet, or knitted fabric privacy/wind screening,except On the Heavy incl str District. 4. Alternative materials may be approved by the planning director or planning commission as part of a discretionary entitlement approval. B. Graffiti-resistance. Graffiti-resistant aesthetic surface treatment shall be required for all fences and walls adjacent to a public right-of-way, in a residential zone, or as determined though the site development review process. C. Maintenance. Fences, walls, and screens shall be continuously maintained in an orderly and good condition, at no more than their maximum allowed height. (Code 1980, § 17.48.040; Ord. No. 855, § 4, 2012; Ord. No. 863 §4, 2013) 17.48.050 Requirements by land use type. A. Applicable to all land use types. 1. Fencing and walls forpools, spas, and similar features. Swimming pools, spas, and other similar water features shall be enclosed in compliance with building code requirements. 2. Fences, walls, and screening between different land uses. Commercial and industrial uses shall be screened from adjacent residential zoning districts by plant materials and a solid, decorative masonry wall with a minimum height of six feet to screen the commercial use, as approved by the designated approving authority. Openings or pedestrian connections may be required at the 1 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 discretion of the designated approving authority. A landscaping strip with a minimum width of five feet shall be installed adjacent to a screening wall-on the commercial or industrial sick facing the public street. 3. Temporary fences. Nothing in this chapter shall be deemed to prohibit the erection of a temporary fence around construction projects in compliance with the building code and other applicable requirements of this Code. 4. Screening standards for fire district connections and double check devices. All ground-mounted equipment is required to be screened according to the following standards. Option A is preferred. Option C should only be used if the other two options are considered infeasible by the planning director. Additional provisions apply to fire check valves (as noted). a. Option A;block wall screen. i. Required materials are decorative block,finished stucco. or a wall designed to match building architecture. ii. Minimum height is three feet with a maximum height of four feet. iii. Minimum three feet clearance between the equipment and the wall. b. Option B;metal screen with vines and equipment painted green. i. Provide metal screen fence painted dark green. ii. Plant climbing vines along the base of the screen. iii. Minimum three feet clearance between the equipment and the screen. iv. If concrete pad is provided around the base of the equipment, the pad must be a minimum of three feet from the property line to allow installation of landscaping. V. Minimum two feet from the face of the screen and the property line. vi. Paint the equipment dark green or equivalent. C. Option C;landscape screen and equipment painted green. i. This option can only be considered if the equipment can be adequately screened by two rows of five-gallon shrubs. Otherwise only Option A or B may be used. ii. Provide two rows of five-gallon shrubs. iii. Spaced 18 inches on center. iv. Minimum three feet clearance between the equipment and the shrubs in required. V. If a concrete pad is provided around the base of the equipment, the pad must be a minimum of two feet from the property line to allow installation of landscaping. vi. No minimum clearance between the property line and the landscaping is required. d. Additional requirements for fire district check valves. i. Maximum five feet overall from the equipment and the property line. ii Signage shall be provided according to fire district standards. iii. The fire district connection must extend beyond the wall or landscaping and must not obstruct the fire district connection. B. Fencing and walls for agricultural land uses. All fences or walls which enclose livestock shall be constructed of an adequate height and shall be designed so as to control and contain such livestock at all times. C. Residential zoning districts. 1. Trail fences and gates shall be kept in good repair at all times, including replacing damaged members and maintaining plumb. This shall not preclude the property owner from replacing the existing trail fence with another fence or wall material. 2 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 2. Height. The height of fences in residential district is limited according to the following table. TABLE 17.48.050-1 MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF FENCES AND WALLS IN REQUIRED YARD AREA Location of Fence/Wall/Screening Location or Minimum Maximum Height(1) Setback of Fence (1),(2) Required front yard area 0 ft(2) 3 ft/6 ft(3) Required rear and interior side yard area (along rear 0 ft 6 ft and interior property lines) Required street side yard area (along corner side 5 ft(2) 6 ft property lines) At intersections of streets, alleys, and driveways Varies(4) 36 in within the clear visibility triangle All other areas of lot 0 ft 6 ft Table notes: As part of site development review, design review(minor or major),or other discretionary entitlement,the designated approving authority may grant additional height or location requirements to enclose or screen specific areas or uses or for fences and walls designed for noise attenuation. (2) Setback area for street side yard is measured property line to the fence or wall. (3) Height of front yard fence or wall may be increased to a maximum of six feet if the top three feet of fencing is constructed of material that is 90 percent visually open and transparent(e.g., picket fence, open wood slats, open wrought iron)including any architectural features designed as part of the fence(e.g., pilasters and lights). (4) See definition of clear vision triangle in section 17.126(Universal Definitions). 3. Outdoor recreation courts. Fencing for outdoor recreation courts (e.g., tennis courts, basketball courts) shall not exceed 12 feet in height and shall be located five feet from any rear or side property lines, except when adjacent to outdoor recreation courts on adjacent properties. D. Commercial, office, and mixed use zoning districts. 1. Outdoor storage (including all dumpsters, commercial items, commercial construction, or industrial-related materials and equipment within commercial zoning districts)shall be fenced or screened from view. Such screening shall utilize enclosures including, but not limited to,fences, walls, landscaping, or earthen berms,so that no outdoor storage is visible from any public rights- of-way, parks, public trails, and adjacent properties. Screening shall be visually compatible with the primary buildings and landscape on the property. 2. Screening of commercial loading docks and refuse areas. Loading docks and refuse storage areas shall be screened from public view, adjoining public streets and rights-of-way and residentially zoned areas.The method of screening shall be architecturally compatible with other on-site development in terms of colors and materials. Trash enclosures shall be consistent with city standard drawings. Exceptions may be permitted through the administrative design review process for sites with unique characteristics (e.g., shallow lot depth, adjacency to single-family residential). E. Industrial zoning districts. 1. Storage area/screening. The purpose of storage area/screening regulations is to allow for on- site storage,which is screened from view from the public right-of-way or from adjacent properties accessible to the public and is architecturally compatible with the surrounding environment. The following standards shall apply according to land use category: a. Standards for storage area/screen wall height in all industrial zoning districts. The height of all storage area/screening walls shall not exceed eight feet, measured from the finished grade immediately adjacent to the wall and the top of the wall. 3 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 b. Industrial Park (IP Zoning District. No outdoor storage shall be permitted except for fleet vehicles and light trucks (not exceeding 6,000 pounds). Outdoor storage tanks may be permitted at a height not to exceed eight feet from highest finished grade when screened from public view by walls constructed of concrete, masonry, or other similar materials. C. General industrial Gateger;es Neo-Industrial (NI) Zoning District. All materials, supplies, equipment, loading docks, and trucks and trailers shall be stored within an enclosed building or an area screened from public view. d Minimum i aGt heavy ind stFial and heavy r dustFial Gategerres Industrial Employment (IE)Zoning District.All materials, supplies, equipment, and operating trucks shall be stored within an enclosed building or storage area. Such storage areas within 120 feet of a street frontage shall be screened. e. Within 600 feet of the 1-15 right-of-way, all outdoor storage shall be screened from public view from the freeway. Screening may include from the 1-15 freeway may considerthe use or combination of block or masonry walls,_berming dense landscapir,n 36-inch box trees planted a maximum of 30 feet apart, or the building mass. f. Within all industrial land use categories, all storage area screening shall be architecturally integrated with surrounding buildings utilizing concrete, masonry,or other similar materials. For walls comprised of the combination of a screen wall on top of a retaining wall, the overall height of the combined wall may exceed eight feet provided that the part of the wall that faces the public right-of-way (street, sidewalk, etc.), does not exceed the maximum height established in section 17.48.050.E.1.a 8XGeed eight foot iR height imeas�gyred from the finished grade immediately adjacent to the wall and the tern of the wall). g. Within the heavy it dust4a] Industrial Employment (IE) Zoning District, storage area screening may include masonry or concrete walls and, metal, or wood fences. The front and exterior side area shall be screened with non-opaque fencing, when loading areas or storage areas are not present. h. Storage of materials or equipment shall not exceed screen height within 100 feet of street- fronting screens. i. The planning director may waive screening requirements where future building expansion would screen an abutting storage area. i. The planning director may waive screening requirements along the front and exterior side of the building if there are no loading docks or storage areas present. 2. Security fences and walls. The purpose of security fencing and wall standards is to provide for a safe environment for businesses within the industrial area. a. Site planning, including building configuration and placement, is encouraged to create defined areas that may be adequately secured. b. Any wall or fence along a street frontage over three feet in height is subject to the streetscape setback requirements. C. Within all industrial land use categories except Heavy Indust the Industrial Employment OE) Zoning District, all fencing or walls shall be wrought iron, concrete, masonry, or other similar materials, not to exceed the maximum height established in section 17.48.050.E.1.a not to exceed a height of eight feet from highest finished grade as described in section 17.48.050E..i.e. The use of barbed wire or similar materials is prohibited from these land use categories. Chain-link fencing is not permitted in the area(s) of a property that is/are located between the public right-of-way (street, sidewalk, etc.), and the building wall plane(s) of the building(s) on the property, that face(s) the public right-of-way. Chain-link fencing may only be used along the side and rear property lines, and within the interior of the property, if the fencing will not be visible from any portion of the public right-of-way that is adjacent to the property. 4 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 d. Within the heavy industrial category Industrial Employment (IE) Zoning District, security fencing may include wrought iron, masonry or concrete walls, and wood or metal fences., or chain link with wood slats. Barbed wire may be permitted atop fencing. e. Security gates are subject to site plan review according to section 17.16.110 (Site Development Review). 3. Trash enclosures. City standard drawings shall be used for all trash enclosures. 5 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT April 2021 ARTICLE IV. SITE DEVELOPMENT PROVISIONS Chapter 17.56 LANDSCAPING STANDARDS Sections: 17.56.010 Purpose. 17.56.020 Applicability. 17.56.030 Landscape and irrigation plans. 17.56.040 Landscape plan review process. 17.56.050 General landscape development standards. 17.56.060 Special landscape requirements. 17.56.070 Residential landscape development standards. 17.56.080 Removal and replacement of required landscaping. 17.56.090 Parkway landscaping. 17.56.050 General landscape development standards. A. General location for landscape improvements. Landscaping shall be provided in the following locations for all types of development as listed below, unless the designated approving authority determines that the required landscape is not necessary to fulfill the purposes of this chapter. Nothing in this chapter is intended to discourage landscape areas outside and beyond the minimum requirements listed herein. 1. Setbacks. All setback areas required by this Code shall be landscaped in compliance with this chapter except where a required setback is occupied by a sidewalk or driveway,or is enclosed and screened from abutting public rights-of-way. In the Neo-Industrial (NI) and Industrial Employment (IE) Zoning Districts only the front and exterior side yard setback areas adloining public rights-of-way are required to be landscaped, including the property frontage within the right-of-way. All other areas within these Industrial Zoning Districts must be paved or surfaced to minimize dust. 2. Undeveloped areas. All areas of a project site not intended for a specific use or purpose in conjunction with a current application, including pad sites being held for future development, shall be landscaped in compliance with this chapter. 3. Parking areas. Within parking lots, landscaping shall be used for shade and climate control, to enhance project design, and to screen the visual impact of vehicles and large expanses of pavement consistent with the requirements of this chapter. B. Plant type. Landscape planting shall emphasize drought-tolerant and native species (especially along natural, open space areas), shall complement the architectural design of structures on the site, and shall be suitable for the soil and climatic conditions specific to the site. In the wildland-urban interface fire area, planting shall emphasize wildfire hazard reduction. 1. Planting layout and plant diversity. Plant selection shall vary in type and planting pattern. Informal planting patterns are preferred over uniform and entirely symmetrical planting patterns. Use of deciduous flowering trees and shrubs and colorful plantings is encouraged in conjunction with evergreen species. Groupings of shrubs shall contain multiple plant types, interspersed with varying heights and blooming seasons for year-round interest. 2. Street and parking lot trees. Street and parking lot trees shall be selected from the city's adopted master list of street trees and parking lot trees. A minimum of 30 percent of the street trees and parking lot trees, respectively, shall be an evergreen species. For parking lots in the Industrial 1 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT April 2021 Zoning Districts with primary buildings greater than 200,000 sf in gross floor area, a minimum of 50 percent of the street trees and parking lot trees shall be an evergreen species. 3. Trees planted within ten feet of a street, sidewalk, paved trail, or walkway shall be a deep-rooted species or shall be separated from hardscapes by a root barrier to prevent physical damage to public improvements. 4. In the wildland-urban interface fire area, plant types shall not include those identified as fire prone or those types that are specifically prohibited by the fire district. C. Planting size, spacing, and planter widths. In order to achieve an immediate effect of a landscape installation and to allow sustained growth of planting materials, minimum plant material sizes, plant spacing, and minimum planter widths (inside measurements) are as follows: 1. Trees. The minimum planting size for trees for commercial, office, and community/civic uses shall be 15-gallon, with 25 percent of all trees on a project site planted at a minimum 24-inch box size. For commercial, office, and community/civic uses, and industrial develepme^}, tree spacing within perimeter planters along streets and abutting residential property shall be planted no farther apart on center than the mature diameter of the proposed species. Minimum planter widths for trees shall be between five feet and ten feet, consistent with the city's adopted master list of street trees and parking lot trees. 2. Trees in industrial zoning districts. a. The minimum planting size for trees for industrial uses shall be 15-gallon with 25 percent of all trees on a project site planted at a minimum 24-inch box size b. The minimum planting size for trees for industrial uses in primary buildings greater than 200,000 square feet in gross floor area shall be minimum 24-inch box size,-with 25 percent of all trees at 36-inch box size. C. -Tree spacing for all industrial uses within perimeter planters along streets and abutting residential property shall be planted no farther apart on center than the mature diameter of the proposed species. Minimum planter widths for trees shall be between five feet and ten feet, consistent with the city's adopted master list of street trees and parking lot trees. 3. Shrubs. Shrub planting shall be a minimum five-gallon size, with a 15-gallon minimum size required where an immediate landscape screen is conditioned by the designated approving authority (e.g., screening of headlights from drive-through aisles). The minimum planter width for shrubs is four feet. 4. Ground cover. Plants used for mass planting may be grown in flats of up to 64 plants or in individual one-gallon containers. Rooted cuttings from flats shall be planted no farther apart than 12 inches on center, and containerized woody, shrub ground cover plantings shall be planted no farther apart than three feet on center in order to achieve full coverage within one year. Minimum planter width for ground cover is two feet, with the exception of sod, which requires a minimum planter width of six feet. D. Synthetic turf. Synthetic turf may be used as a substitute for natural turf for the purposes of water conservation. The following standards shall apply to the use and maintenance of synthetic turf. 1. Synthetic turf shall consist of lifelike individual blades of grass that emulate real grass in look and color and have a minimum pile height of one and one-half inches. 2. A proper drainage system shall be installed underneath to prevent excess runoff or pooling of water. 3. Synthetic turf shall be installed and maintained to effectively simulate the appearance of a well maintained lawn. 4. The use of indoor or outdoor plastic or nylon carpeting as a replacement for synthetic turf or natural turf shall be prohibited. 2 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT April 2021 5. Synthetic turf shall be installed in combination with natural plant materials (e.g. trees, shrubs and groundcover)to enhance the overall landscaping design. E. Water efficiency. If applicable, projects are required to comply with provisions within chapter 17.82 (water efficient landscaping) of this article. (Code 1980, § 17.56.050; Ord. No. 855, § 4, 2012; Ord. No. 860 §4, 2013; Ord. No. 879 §4, 2015) 17.56.060 Special landscape requirements. In addition to the general requirements of section 17.56.050 (general landscape development standards), the requirements listed below apply to the special types of landscaping. However, in the wildland-urban interface fire area, the fire district requirements preclude the application of these special types of landscaping. A. Residential landscape. See section 17.56.070 (additional requirements for residential areas). B. Project entry landscaping. Entries to multi-tenant projects (both residential and nonresidential) shall be designed as a special statement reflective of the character and scale of the project to establish identity for tenants, visitors, and patrons. Flowering access plantings and specimen trees shall be used to reinforce the entry statement. C. Trees adjacent to building walls.With the exception of single-family housing developments,trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of building dimenSieRS length, particularly to interrupt expansive horizontal and vertical surfaces. Tree clusters may be used to satisfy d8Si R bjeGtives subject to approval bV the approving authority. D. Screening of drive-through aisles. To screen vehicles and associated headlights in a drive-through lane from view of abutting street rights-of-way, a minimum five-foot wide planter shall include a minimum three-foot tall (maximum four-foot tall) landscape barrier planted with trees and other landscaping consistent with those in the parking area.At no time shall this landscape barrier be pruned in a manner that allows the vehicle headlights from the drive-through lane to be visible from abutting street rights-of-way. Plantings shall also be designed to discourage potential safety issues (e.g., persons lying in wait). E. Screening of outdoor equipment. Screening is required according to chapter 17.48(fences,walls, and screening). F. Wireless communication facilities. Where feasible, facilities shall be installed so as to maintain and enhance existing landscaping on the site, including trees, foliage, and shrubs, whether or not utilized for screening. Additional landscaping may be planted around the tower and related equipment to buffer abutting residential zoning districts or uses and to buffer public trails. Specifically, landscaping around the perimeter of the facility(leased area)shall include dense tree and shrub plantings with the necessary irrigation. Trees shall be fast-growing evergreen species, with a minimum size of 24-inch box. Shrubs shall be a minimum 15-gallon size covering a minimum planter area depth of five feet around the facility. Trees and shrubs shall be planted no farther apart on center than the mature diameter of the proposed species. G. On-site pedestrian pathways. Pedestrian pathway landscaping shall include shade trees placed so as to cover 60 percent of the total pathway area with tree canopies within 15 years of securing building permit. H. Creeks. To the extent that landscaping or planting is required or provided along creeks, such landscaping shall be native plants. I. Public spaces. Pedestrian space landscaping shall include a combination of shade trees and pedestrian shading devices (e.g. canopies, awnings, and umbrellas) placed so as to cover 60 percent of the total space with a shade canopy within 15 years of securing the building permit. 3 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT April 2021 J. Signs. Landscaping shall be provided at the base of the supporting structure of freestanding signs equal to twice the area of one face of the sign. For example, 50 square feet of sign area requires 100 square feet of landscaped area. K. Buffering between uses. A landscape buffer shall be provided between residential and nonresidential uses and between single-family uses and multi-family uses containing three or more units. Buffer areas shall include a minimum ten-foot wide planter strip with shrubs and both deciduous and evergreen trees planted a maximum of 30 feet on center. L. Interior property boundaries. When a landscaped area is provided, trees shall be planted at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of interior property line within a planter area that is a minimum of six feet wide. Tree clusters may be used subject to approval by the approving authority+^ satisfy SpeGifi.G dGSigR E)Ne tiVeS M. Sound walls/masonry walls. Where setback and open space areas are screened from public view by walls or similar approved structures, landscaping shall be provided such that 50 percent of the wall shall be covered by landscape material within five years. N. Parking lot landscape. Parking lot landscape includes perimeter planters, abutting parking lots and drive aisles, tree planting for parking lot shade, and a combination of continuous planting strips, planting fingers, and parking islands throughout the parking lot. Parking lot landscape requirements applicable to commercial, industrial, mixed-use, and multi-family residential parking lots with five or more spaces are listed below: 1. Number of trees required. Trees shall be required at a rate of one tree for every three parking stalls. At maturity, trees should reach a minimum height and spread of 40 feet so as to form a shade canopy over parking stalls;_ Smaller ornamental trees may not be used to satisfy this requirement. The minimum width for planters containing a parking lot tree is six feet. Tree selections shall be approved by the planning director. a. Number of trees required in industrial zoning districts. Trees shall be required at a rate of one tree for every five parking stalls within a planter area that is a minimum of 10 feet in width. Tree clusters may be used subject to approval by the approving authority. b. Exception for solar collectors. The minimum requirement for trees and shrubs in Industrial Zoning Districts shall be waived for the portion of a parking area over which photo-voltaic solar collectors are installed where they also function as shade structures. 2. A minimum of ten percent of the total off-street parking area shall be landscaped with trees, shrubs, and appropriate ground cover. The parking area shall be computed by adding the areas used for access drive aisles, stalls, maneuvering, and landscaping within that portion of the premises that is devoted to vehicular parking and circulation. 3. Each unenclosed parking facility shall provide a perimeter landscaped strip at least five feet wide (inside dimension) where the facility adjoins a side or rear property line. The perimeter landscaped strip may include any landscaped yard or landscaped area otherwise required and shall be continuous, except for required access to the site or parking facility. 4. Screening. All surface parking areas shall be screened from streets and adjoining properties, and the open space areas between the property line and public street right-of-way shall be landscaped with a combination of trees, shrubs, and ground cover. Screening between residential and nonresidential uses shall not be less than five feet in height. Parking lot landscaping shall be located so that pedestrians are not required to cross unpaved areas to reach building entrances from parked cars (see Figure 17.56.060-1 [Parking Lot Landscaping]). 5. Existing trees. Existing mature trees on the site in good health shall be preserved whenever possible. 6. Planter design. All parking lot planters shall be designed to meet the following minimum requirements (see Figure 17.56.060-2 [Parking Lot Planter Design]): 4 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT April 2021 a. Planters shall be separated from maneuvering and parking areas by a six-inch, raised concrete curb or equivalent. b. Tree planting wells located at the front of parking stalls shall contain a minimum of 25 square feet and the smallest outside dimension shall not be less than five feet. C. Landscape planters along the sides of parking stalls shall contain a minimum of 90 square feet and the smallest outside dimension shall not be less than six feet. FIGURE 17.56.060-1 PARKING LOT LANDSCAPING Landscape Screen Low Profile Wall Landscape Screen ��r N_ qr Go 0 ✓_ >� Low Profile Wall G Berm 5 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT April 2021 FIGURE 17.56.060-2 PARKING LOT PLANTER DESIGN 90 SQ FT.Minimum Planter 5' Along Side of Stall 5' 16' 0R 5' S, 25 50 FT.Minimum Planter Along Per Stall Front (Code 1980, § 17.56.060; Ord. No. 855, §4, 2012; Ord. No. 879§4, 2015) 6 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 ARTICLE IV. SITE DEVELOPMENT PROVISIONS Chapter 17.64 PARKING AND LOADING STANDARDS Sections: 17.64.010 Purpose. 17.64.020 Applicability. 17.64.030 Permit and plan check requirements. 17.64.040 General parking and loading requirements. 17.64.050 Number of parking spaces required. 17.64.060 Reductions in parking requirements. 17.64.070 Parking management plan 17.64.080 Parking requirements for the disabled. 17.64.090 Parking and driveway design and development. 17.64.100 Loading area requirements. 17.64.110 Bicycle parking requirements. 17.64.120 Electric vehicle parking requirements. 17.64.130 Maintenance. 17.64.050 Number of parking spaces required. A. The following number of parking spaces shall be required to serve the uses or buildings listed, as established in Table 17.64.050-1 (Parking Requirements by Land Use). Multiple property owners may apply for a conditional use permit for shared parking pursuant to section 17.64.060 (Reductions in Parking Requirements). Otherwise, all uses must provide the sum of the requirements for each individual use.Where the requirements result in a fractional space,the next larger whole number shall be the number of spaces required. In addition, the requirements listed below shall apply. 1. "Square feet' means "gross square feet" and refers to the sum gross square feet of the floor area of a building and its accessory buildings unless otherwise specified. 2. For the purpose of calculating residential parking requirements, dens, studies, or other similar rooms that may be used as bedrooms shall be considered bedrooms. 3. Where the number of seats is listed to determine required parking, seats shall be construed to be fixed seats. Where fixed seats provided are either benches or bleachers, one seat shall be construed to equal 18 linear inches for pews and 24 inches for dining, but in no case shall seating be less than determined as required by the building code. 4. When the calculation of the required number of off-street parking spaces results in a fraction of a space, the total number of spaces shall be rounded up to the nearest whole number. 5. Where private streets are proposed for residential development, resident and guest parking shall be provided as determined by the approving authority in conjunction with the required planning entitlement(s). 6. For projects on commercial, office and industrial zoned properties, square footage dedicated to office hallways 44 inches or less, electrical and mechanical rooms, elevator shafts, stairwells, bathrooms and storage closets may be deducted from the gross square footage for parking stall calculation purposes. 7. For all warehouse/storage/e-commerce uses in the industrial zoning districts, the established minimum parking requirements are intended targets. Reductions in the amount of required parking appropriate for a specific use(s) may be approved by the approving authority based on 1 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 the approval of a parking management plan as well as through the conditional use permit and master plan processes, as applicable. See footnote 1 in Table 17.14.060-1 (Approving Authority for Land Use Entitlements). TABLE 17.64.050-1 PARKING REQUIREMENTS BY LAND USE Use Spaces Notes Residential Single-family detached dwellings 2 per unit 2 in garage Multi-family development(condominium, townhome, etc.), semi-detached single-family(zero lot line, patio homes, duplexes, etc.), and mobile home parks 0) -Studio 1.3 per unit 1 in garage or carport -One bedroom 1.5 per unit 1 in garage or carport -Two bedrooms 2 per unit 1 in garage or carport -Three bedrooms 2 per unit 2 in garage or carport - Four or more bedrooms 2.5 per unit 2 in garage or carport -Visitor(additional required) 1 per 3 units Commercial, Service, and Office Uses Shopping centers - Less than 25,000 square feet Varies See individual uses -25,000 to 599,000 square feet 5 per 1,000 sf Centers built prior to 1988 4.5/1,000 -599,000 to 1,000,000 square feet 5.5 per 1,000 sf or a parking Centers built prior to 1988 study may be provided require 4.5/1,000 - Food service (if over 15%of GLA)(2) +1 per 100 sf Additional applied to floor area of food service use -Cinemas in centers less than 100,000 square feet +3 per 100 seats (occupying less than 10%of GLA)(2) -Cinemas in centers of 100,000 to 200,000 square feet, +3 per 100 additional parking only required after the first 750 seats -Offices (if over 10%of GLA)(2) - Parking study required -Shopping center over 1,000,000 square feet - Parking study required Carwash and detail (full-service) 16 stalls Carwash (self-service and drive-thru) 2.5 per wash bay Service/gas station 3.0 per 1,000 sf+2 per service bay Barber shops/beauty parlors Park at retail Laundromats and/or dry cleaners Park at retail Offices,financial institutions, retail stores 4 per 1,000 sf 2 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 Use Spaces Notes Commercial storage yards (e.g., contractors, salvage) 6 spaces Separated from enclosed storage area Includes area of open area Lumber yard 4 per 1,000 sf devoted to display of lumber and other products Mortuaries and funeral homes 1 per 35 sf Applies only to the assembly room floor area Motels and hotels 1 per unit+2 2 additional spaces for manager Customer parking (additional Vehicle sales, repair, service 2.5 per 1,000 sf spaces needed for vehicle storage related to business operations) Furniture and appliance stores 2 per 1,000 sf Day cares/preschools 1 per employee+ 1 per 5 children Storage for utility-owned Public utilities uses 1 per 2 employees(2 vehicles must also be minimum) provided for Commercial Recreation Uses Bowling alleys and/or billiard halls 5 per alley and/or 2 per table Stables 1 per 5 horses Driving ranges 1 per tee Additional parking required for related uses on site Golf courses 6 per hole Additional parking required for related uses on site Miniature golf course 3 per hole Additional parking required for related uses on site Includes related uses and all Skating rinks 5 per 1,000 sf indoor and outdoor"active" areas Included related uses and all Swimming pool (commercial) 5 per 1,000 sf indoor and outdoor"active" areas Tennis, handball, and racquetball facilities 3 per court Additional parking required for related uses on site Health clubs and other fitness related facilities 5 per 1,000 sf Educational Uses Elementary and junior high schools 2 per classroom Senior high school 1 per employee+ 1 per 6 students Colleges, universities 1 per 2 employees+ 1 per 3 students Commercial schools (trade, business colleges, etc.) 1 per student+ 1 per faculty 3 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 Use Spaces Notes Medical/Health Uses Dentist, medical, veterinary offices/clinics 5 per 1,000 sf Congregate care facilities(e.g., nursing, children's, 1 per 4 beds Based on resident capacity sanitariums) Hospitals 1.75 per bed Places of Assembly Restaurants and lounges 10 per 1,000 sf Fast-food restaurant 10 per 1,000 sf Auditoriums,sports arenas,stadiums 1 per 3 seats or 1 per 35 sf Movie theaters of seating area -Single screen 1 per 3 seats - Multi-screen 1 per 4 seats 1.5 linear feet on a bench is 1 per 3 seats or 1 per 35 sf equivalent to 1 seat; Other places of assembly(e.g., churches) of main auditorium schedule of activities and/or parking study may be required Industrial, Warehousing, and Manufacturing(3)(4) 1 per 1,000 sf for first 20,000 Warehouse/Storage/E-Commerce sf; 1 per 2,000 sf for the next 20,000 sf; and 1 per 4,000 sf for the remaining sf Industrial/manufacturing 2 per 1,000 sf Research and development 3 per 1,000 sf Office and administration 4 per 1,000 sf Multi-tenant buildings (office less than 35 percent GLA)(2) 2.5 per 1,000 sf Indoor wholesale/retail commercial 4 per 1,000 sf Table notes: (') Fifty percent of the total required covered spaces shall be within enclosed garage structures.The use of carports requires approval from the design review committee. (2) GLA is gross leasable area. 0) See section 17.64.100.D.4(Trailer parking required)for trailer parking requirements. (4) See section 17.64.120(Electric vehicle parking requirements)for electric vehicle parking requirements. B. Uses not listed. Other uses not specifically listed in this section shall furnish parking as required by the designated approving authority in determining the off-street parking requirements. The approving authority shall be guided by the requirements in this section generally and shall determine the minimum number of spaces required to avoid interference with public use of streets and alleys. (Code 1980, § 17.64.050; Ord. No. 855, §4, 2012; Ord. No. 863 §4, 2013) 17.64.060 Reductions in parking requirements. A. The required number of parking spaces may be reduced in accordance with the following requirements. 4 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 B. Shared parking. In order to encourage efficient use of parking spaces and good design practices, the total parking requirements for conjunctive uses shall be based on the number of spaces adequate to meet various needs of the individual uses operating during the peak parking period. 1. Conditional uJJse permit for shared parking. A conditional use permit may be approved for shared parking facilities serving more than one use on a site or serving more than one property. The conditional use permit may allow for a reduction of the total number of spaces required by this chapter if the following findings are made: a. The peak hours of parking demand from all uses do not coincide so that peak demand will not be greater than the parking provided. i. The efficiency of parking provided will equal or exceed the level that can be expected if parking for each use were provided separately. 2. Shared parking agreement. A written agreement between the landowners and in some cases the city that runs with the land shall be filed, in a form satisfactory to the city attorney, and include: a. A guarantee that there will be no substantial alteration in the uses that will create a greater demand for parking without application for approval of an amended conditional use permit. b. A reciprocal grant of nonexclusive license among the business operator(s) and the landowner(s)for access to and use of the shared parking facilities. C. Evidence that the agreement has been recorded in the county recorder's office. C. Other parking reductions. Required parking for any use except a single-family dwelling, accessory dwelling unit, or two-family dwelling may be reduced through approval of a minor exception by the planning director. Required parking may be reduced with approval of a conditional use permit for all new industrial uses in the Neo-Industrial (NI) and Industrial Employment(IE)Zoning Districts. 1. Criteria for approval.The planning d+restof-approving authority will only grant a minor use permit or a conditional use permit for reduced parking if it fonds isdetermined that the project meets all of the minor use permit criteria in section 17.16.120 (Minor use permits) or the conditional use permit criteria in section 17.20.060 (Conditional use permit), and that three or more of the circumstances listed below are true. a. The use will be adequately served by the proposed parking due to the nature of the proposed operation; proximity to frequent transit service; transportation characteristics of persons residing, working, or visiting the site; or because the applicant has undertaken a travel demand management program that will reduce parking demand at the site. b. Parking demand generated by the project will not exceed the capacity of or have a detrimental impact on the supply of on-street parking in the surrounding area. C. The site plan is consistent with the objectives of the zoning district and incorporates features such as unobtrusive off-street parking placed below the ground level of the project with commercial uses above or enclosed parking on the ground floor. d. The applicant has provided on-site parking for car-share vehicles via a recorded written agreement between the landowner and the city that runs with the land. Agreement shall provide for proof of a perpetual agreement with a car-share agency to provide at least one car share vehicle on-site. 2. Application submittal requirements. In order to evaluate a proposed project's compliance with the above criteria, the planning director may require submittal of a parking demand study that substantiates the basis for granting a reduced number of spaces. D. Mixed use parking. All mixed use projects shall include a parking study prepared by a qualified traffic/parking consultant that demonstrates how proposed land uses utilize the parking spaces that are required per section 17.64.050-1. Parking studies are subject to review and acceptance by the 5 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 director of engineering services/city engineer and planning director, and an independent peer review consultant. The parking study may also include a discussion of the following options for a reduction of required parking, including, but not limited to: 1. Shared parking may be provided per section 17.64.060 B. 2. State density bonus may be provided per chapter 17.46. 3. Tandem parking may be counted towards the required parking calculation. 4. Implement a parking management strategy that may contain the following provisions, but are not limited to: a. Monitored with periodic inspections; b. Storage within the unit, and not within garage (view windows on garages); C. HOA to enforce limitation of number of vehicles per unit; d. Time restriction on guest parking; and e. Shuttles that cater to users within the development. 5. Implement a car/bicycle share program in which vehicles/bicycles are made available for shared use to individuals on a short term basis. (Code 1980, § 17.64.060; Ord. No. 855, §4, 2012; Ord. No. 881 §4, 2015; Ord. No. 938 § 9, 2018) E. Industrial use parking— "land banking". 1. If the final end-user has not been determined for an industrial development for which entitlements are requested pursuant to the provisions of this Code, and the parking and loading demand characteristics for the use are unknown, the anticipated maximum amount of employee, truck, and trailer parking specified in Table 17.64.050-1 (Parking Requirements by Land Use) shall be determined. In addition, the director may require the submittal of a parking and loading demand study to be prepared by the applicant or by the city and funded by the applicant. Such a study shall estimate the parking demand for the likely proposed use(s) including a worst case scenario based on the recommendations of the Institute of Traffic Engineers, Urban Land Institute, the American Planning Association, or other acceptable source of parking demand data for uses and/or combinations of uses of comparable activities, scale, bulk, area, and location. 2. The applicant shall submit a site plan acceptable to the director showing how all the parking for employees, trucks, and trailers will be provided on the site in compliance with the applicable requirements of this chapter. However, if the director determines that not all of the parking is required for the final proposed use(s), then subject to the provisions of section 17.14.100 (Modification), the excess "land banked" parking may be identified on the approved site plan and not constructed until such time as the parking is required for a future use(s). These areas shall be set aside as open space and landscaped in such a manner that they will not be used for parking. In addition, a binding covenant or other legal agreement in a form acceptable to the city attorney shall be submitted and signed by the property owner and tenant guaranteeing that the reserved open space will be constructed for employee, truck or trailer parking if a change to a more parking-intensive use occurs. 3. The applicant shall conduct a study of actual parking use to be carried out by a qualified consultant at the time of change of tenancy or within three years after the facility is fully occupied and the use established or at other such earlier time as deemed necessary by the director due to observed parking deficiencies or traffic queuing. The parking study shall be subject to approval by the director. The city may require construction of some or all of the additional parking if the parking study demonstrates need. If the owner fails to comply, the city may, but shall not be obligated to, undertake construction of the required additional parking. Any costs and expenses incurred by the city shall be the responsibility of the owner. 6 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 17.64.070 Parking management plan A. Purpose. This section provides regulatory standards governing the requirements of parking management plans in the Neo-Industrial (NI) and Industrial Employment (IE) Zoning Districts. The purpose of the plan is to minimize traffic, manage on-site circulation, and effectively allocate parking needs for each industrial site. B. Applicability. A parking management plan shall be provided as part of a comprehensive effort for establishing employee, quest, truck, and trailer parking in a new industrial development within the Neo-Industrial (NI) and Industrial Employment (IE) Zoning Districts and how those spaces are managed. C. Parkinq management plan. A parking management plan shall be processed as a part of the site development review, subject to approval of the planning commission. The plan shall comply with the following: 1. The parking management plan shall be based on a parking study documenting parking demand beyond the minimum allowance in Table 17.64.050-1 (Parking Requirements by Land Use). 2. The parking management plan shall identify the location of specific parking facilities and the number of parking spaces in such facilities that are available to meet the parking demand of the new development. 3. Parking identified on the plan shall be delineated as being reserved for employees, guests, trucks, or trailers, and whether other access control measures are used to ensure the availability and enforcement of the plan as well as on-site vehicle circulation. 4. The parking analysis shall demonstrate that parking for all users is provided, identifying existing supply and demand for similar uses and what will be provided on site. 5. The owner or manager designee of a development approved under the parking management plan shall provide an accurate and current record of the uses and parking allocation for the development. The planning director maV require this record to be provided or updated annually if it is determined that parking for the proposed use is impacting adjacent streets, and when the owner applies for a change in use or development plan review for the subject site. 17.64.080 Parking requirements for the disabled. A. Number of spaces, design standards. Parking spaces for the disabled shall be provided in compliance with the building code and state and federal law. B. Reservation of spaces required. The number of disabled accessible parking spaces required by this chapter shall be reserved by the property owner/tenant for use by the disabled throughout the life of the approved land use. C. Upgrading of markings required. If amendments to state or federal law change standards for the marking, striping, and signing of disabled access parking spaces, disabled accessible spaces shall be upgraded in the time and manner required by law. (Code 1980, § 17.64.070; Ord. No. 855, § 4, 2012) 17.64.090 Parking and driveway design and development. A. Surface parking area. All surface parking areas shall have the following improvements: 1. Each required parking space and aisle shall be graded, drained, and surfaced so as to prevent dust, mud, or standing water and shall be identified by pavement markings, wheel stops, entrance and exit signing, and directional signs, to the satisfaction of the city engineer. All new parking spaces shall be painted with double stripe pavement markings. 7 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 2. Lighting, giving a ground-level illumination of one to five footcandles, shall be provided in the parking area during the time it is accessible to the public after daylight. Lighting shall be shielded to prevent glare on contiguous residential properties. 3. Where such parking area abuts a street, it shall be separated by an ornamental fence, wall, or compact evergreen hedge having a height of not less than two feet and maintained at a height of not more than four feet. Such fence, wall, or hedge shall be maintained in good condition. 4. Parking spaces shall be marked and access lanes clearly defined. Bumpers and wheel stops shall be installed,as necessary. 5. Landscape materials are permitted to overhang the curb/wheel stop creating a reduction in impervious surface material. B. Driveway location standards. Development projects located at intersections shall be accessed as follows: 1. Driveways to access parcels located at the intersection of two streets shall, where feasible, be gained through driveways from the lesser street. Determination of which street is lesser shall be made based on total paving width, amount of traffic, adjacent traffic controls, and likely destinations along each street in question. 2. Driveways serving parcels located at the intersection of two streets shall be situated at the maximum practical distance from the intersection. 3. Where a proposed driveway is located at least 75 feet from the nearest cross street, the requirements of section 17.64.90.C.1 and 2 may be waived. C. Driveway size and composition. All residential driveways shall be a minimum of 19 feet in length and shall be constructed with a lasting, durable surface (e.g., concrete, asphalt, grasscrete, or similar material) and shall be constructed to appropriate requirements as determined by the city. (Code 1980, § 17.64.080; Ord. No. 855, §4, 2012; Ord. No. 860 §4, 2013) 17.64.100 Loading area requirements. A. Required loading spaces for delivery and distribution. A building, or part thereof, having a floor area of 10,000 square feet or more that is to be occupied by any use requiring the receipt or distribution by vehicles or trucks of material or merchandise must provide at least one off-street loading space, plus one additional such loading space for each additional 40,000 square feet of floor area. The off-street loading space(s) must be maintained during the existence of the building or use it is required to serve. Truck-maneuvering areas must not encroach into required parking areas,travelways, or street rights- of-way (see Figure 17.64.090-2 (Loading Areas for Delivery)). B. Required loading spaces for customers. Customer loading spaces allow bulky merchandise to be loaded into customers' vehicles. For uses that sell bulky items (furniture, appliances, home improvement sales, etc.), at least two customer loading spaces per business establishment or one customer loading space per 40,000 square feet of floor area, whichever is greater shall be provided. Customer loading spaces shall be located adjacent to the building or to an outdoor sales area where bulky merchandise is stored and shall be clearly visible from the main building entry or through directional signage visible from the main entry. Customer loading spaces shall not be located in such a way that they impede on-site traffic circulation, as determined by the director of engineering services/city engineer or encroach into designated emergency vehicle/fire access lanes as determined by the fire chief(see Figure 17.64.090-1 (Customer Loading Areas). C. Required loading spaces for industrial uses. All industrial uses shall provide a minimum of one loading space per proposed loading bay. For each loading bay proposed, a minimum of one on-site truck queuing space must be provided. Each on-site truck queuing space shall be a minimum of nine feet in width and 65 feet in length and shall be included on the circulation management plan if 8 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 required by the approving authority. The truck queuing spaces shall be grouped together in a designated area with clear access to loading bays. D. Requirements for off-street loading spaces. 1. Minimum size. Each off-street loading space required by this section must be not less than 12 feet wide, 30 feet long, and 15 feet high, exclusive of driveways for ingress and egress and maneuvering areas. Loading spaces for customers may be 12 feet wide, 26 feet long, and 12 feet high. 2. Driveways for ingress and egress and maneuvering areas. Each off-street loading space required by this section must be provided with driveways for ingress and egress and maneuvering space adequate for trucks, per city standards. 3. Location of loading areas. An off-street loading space (excluding loading spaces for customers) required by this section must not be located closer than 30 feet to any lot or parcel of land in a residential district, unless such off-street loading space is wholly enclosed within a building or on all sides by a wall not less than eight feet in height. Except in industrial zoning districts, a loading door or loading dock that is visible from a public street must be screened with an eight- foot high, solid masonry or other sound-absorbing wall, with landscaping planted between the wall and the right-of-way. 4. Trailer parking required. One parking space of,parking for a trailer is required for each loading dock door. The minimum dimensions of a single trailer parking space is 50 feet in length, 14 feet in width, and 14 feet in vertical clearance. Trailer parking spaces shall be located in a designated area located away from the loading bays and paths of travel. All trailer parking areas must be screened according to the provisions of section 17.48.050 (Requirements by land use type) for industrial areas. 17.64.120 Electric vehicle parking requirements. The following requirements apply to electric vehicle parking facilities. All charging facilities shall be approved through the plan check/zoning clearance process: A. Electric vehicle charging. When provided, electric vehicle charging stations shall meet the requirements of the California Electrical Code. B. Designated spaces. Outdoor charging of electric vehicle shall only occur in designated electric vehicle spaces, according to the following: 1. Electricity shall only be provided from outdoor electrical outlets installed according to the California Electrical Code. 2. Electric cords shall not cross vehicular or pedestrian pathways. 3. When installed in common parking areas (e.g., surface parking lots, garages, etc.), the spaces shall be restricted to electric vehicles charging only and identified with signage and pavement markings. C. Electric vehicles in single-family residential zoning districts. When installed, electric vehicle charging in single-family residential areas shall be located as follows: 1. Within a garage or carport; 2. Outside of setback area; or 3. If within a setback area, screened from view of the public right-of-way with landscaping or fencing. (Code 1980, § 17.64.110; Ord. No. 855, § 4, 2012) D. Electric vehicles in Industrial Zoning Districts. A minimum of 10 percent of required parking in all new developments within the Industrial Zoning Districts for employees and quests shall be reserved for electric vehicles and shall conform to the standards in subsections A and B above. One charging 9 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 station shall be installed for every two spaces dedicated to electric vehicles. Additionally, charging stations for electric powered trucks maV be required as determined bV the approving authority. 10 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 ARTICLE IV: SITE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Chapter 17.66 PERFORMANCE STANDARDS Sections: 17.66.010 Purpose and intent. 17.66.020 General requirements. 17.66.030 Points of measurement. 17.66.040 Hazardous materials. 17.66.050 Noise standards. 17.66.060 Odor, particulate matter, and air containment standards. 17.66.070 Vibration. 17.66.080 Heat. 17.66.090 Radioactivity or electric disturbance. 17.66.100 Liquid or solid wastes. 17.66.110 Special industrial performance standards. 17.66.110 Special industrial performance standards. A. Purpose. The performance standards allow industrial uses to operate consistent with the overall characteristics of the land use category to provide for a healthy, safe, and pleasing environment in keeping with the nature and level of surrounding industrial activity. The performance standards contained in Table 17.66.110-1 (Industrial Performance Standards) are applied based on the zoning districts as follows: 1. Industrial Park (IP) Zoning District; Class A performance standards. The most restrictive of the performance standards to ensure a high quality working environment and available sites for industrial and business firms whose functional and economic needs require protection from the adverse effects of noise, odors, vibration, glare, or high-intensity illumination, and other nuisances. 2 GeneFal indust4al (Go Zoning Di_1-;_,,Neo-Industrial (NI) Zoning District; Class B performance standards. These standards are intended to enable a complementary mix of uses and provide for the broadest raRge a limited range of industrial activity while assuring a basic level environmental protection. It is the intent of the standards of this section to provide for uses whose operational needs may produce noise, vibration, particulate matter and air contaminants, odors, or humidity, heat, and glare which cannot be mitigated sufficiently to meet the Class A standards. The standards are so designed to protect uses on adjoining sites from effects which could adversely affect their functional and economic viability. 33 Medium imri G04igh Impart (M040 and uoa„„ Industrial (140 epin,v ie�tslndustrial Employment NE)Zoning District;Class C performance standards. It is the intent of the standards of this section to make allowances for industrial uses whose associated processes produce noise, particulate matter and air contaminants, vibration, odor, humidity, heat, glare, or high- intensity illumination which would adversely affect the functional and economic viability of other uses. The standards, when combined with standards imposed by other governmental agencies, serve to provide basic health and safety protection for persons employed within or visiting the area. PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 TABLE 17.66.110-1 INDUSTRIAL PERFORMANCE STANDARDS Class A Class B Class C Noise Maximum •70dB(anywhere on lot) •80 dB(anywhere on lot) •85 dB(lot line) •65 dB(interior space of neighboring use •65dB(at residential property line) •65dB(at residential property line) on same lot) •Noise caused by motor vehicles and •Where a use occupies a lot abutting or •Noise caused by motor vehicles is trains is exempted from this standard. separated by a street from a lot within the exempted from this standard. designated Class A or B performance standard or residential property,the performance standard of the abutting property shall apply at the common or facing lot line. Vibration All uses shall be so operated as not to All uses shall be operated so as not to All uses shall be operated so as not to generate vibration discernible without generate vibration discernible without generate vibration discernible without instruments by the average person while instruments by the average persons instruments by the average person beyond on or beyond the lot upon which the beyond the lot upon which the source is 600 feet from where the source is located. source is located or within an adjoining located.Vibration caused by motor Vibration caused by motor vehicles,trains, enclosed space if more than one vehicles,trains,and temporary and temporary construction and demolition establishment occupies a structure. construction or demolition is exempted is exempted from this standard. Vibration caused by motor vehicles,trains, from this standard. and temporary construction or demolition work is exempted from this standard. Particulate Matter and Air Contaminants In addition to compliance with the Air In addition to compliance with the AQMD In addition to compliance with the AQMD Quality Management District(AQMD) standards,all uses shall be operated so as standards,all uses shall be operated so as standards,all uses shall be operated so as not to emit particulate matter or air not to emit particulate matter or air not to emit particulate matter or air contaminants that are readily detectable contaminants that(a)are injurious to the contaminants that are readily detectable without instruments by the average person health of either persons engaged in or without instruments by the average person beyond any lot line of the lot containing related to the use of the lot,or persons while on the lot containing such uses. such uses. residing,working,visiting,or recreating in neighboring areas;(b)substantially and adversely affect the maintenance of property in nearby areas;(c)are disruptive of industrial processes carried on in other parts of the industrial area.Where a use occupies a lot abutting or separated by a street lot with designated Class A or B,the A or B performance standard for particulate matter and air contaminants shall apply at the common or facing lot line. Odor All uses shall be operated so as not to All uses shall be operated so as not to All uses shall be operated so as not to emit matter causing unpleasant odors that emit matter causing unpleasant odors that emit matter causing unpleasant odors that are perceptible to the average person are perceptible to the average person are perceptible to the average person while within or beyond the lot containing beyond any lot line of the lot containing beyond any lot line of the lot containing such uses. such uses. such uses. Humidity,Heat,and Glare All uses shall be operated so as not to All uses shall be operated so as not to All uses shall be operated so as not to produce humidity,heat,glare,or high- produce humidity,heat,glare,or high- produce humidity,heat,glare,or high- intensity illumination that is perceptible intensity illumination that is perceptible intensity illumination that is perceptible without instruments by the average person without instruments by the average person without instruments by the average person while on or beyond the lot containing such beyond the lot line of any lot containing while on any lot zoned for residential use. such use. purposes or any industrial property with a Class A or B performance standard designation. PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 Chapter 17.76 ALTERNATIVE ENERGY SYSTEMS AND FACILITIES Sections: 17.76.010 Purpose and applicability. 17.76.020 Development criteria for solar systems. 17.76.030 Development standards for wind energy systems. 17.76.010 Purpose and applicability. This chapter sets forth provisions for the development of alternative energy systems to protect public health and safety while supporting efforts to develop small-scale, distributed energy generation to reduce the amount of electricity drawn from the regional power grid. (Code 1980, § 17.76.010; Ord. No. 855, §4, 2012; Ord. No. 858 §4, 2013) 17.76.020 Development criteria for solar systems. A. All new residential development projects, except condominium conversions, shall provide for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities (lot size and configuration permitting orientation of a structure in an east-west alignment for southern exposure or lot size and configuration permitting orientation of a structure to take advantage of shade or prevailing breezes). 1. Consideration shall be given to local climate, to contour, to lot configuration, and to other design and improvement requirements. 2. Consideration shall be given to provide the long axis of the majority of individual lots shall be within 22.5 degrees east or west of true south for adequate exposure for solar energy systems. B. In the Neo-Industrial (NI) and Industrial Employment OE) Zoning Districts a solar collector system must be provided on all new industrial developments. Solar collectors must cover a minimum of 75 percent of the roof area of all buildings and structures and be designed to be within 22.5 degrees east of west of true south to ensure maximum efficiency for the solar energy system. Solar collectors may be installed on support structures that provide shade over parking areas to achieve minimum coverage requirements (See section 17.56.060.N.1.b (Exceptions for solar collectors)). C. No person shall allow a tree or shrub to be placed or grown so as to cast a shadow greater than ten percent of the collector absorption area upon that solar collector surface on the property of another at any one time between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 2:00 p.m., provided that this section shall not apply to specific trees and shrubs which at the time of installation of a solar collector or during the remainder of that annual solar cycle cast a shadow upon that solar collector. D. The location of a solar collector is required to comply with the local building and setback regulations and to be set back not less than five feet from the property line or any easement that is adjacent to the property line. E. Developers of all new residential subdivisions shall dedicate easements for the purpose of assuring that each lot or dwelling unit shall have the right to receive sunlight across adjacent lots or units for use of a solar energy system. The easements may be contained in a declaration of restrictions for the subdivision, which shall be recorded concurrently with recordation of the final map or issuance of permits, whichever shall first occur. The easements shall prohibit the casting of shadows by vegetation, structures, fixture, or any other object, except for utility wires and similar objects. 1 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 FIGURE 17.76.020-1 SOLAR ACCESS ff - N R , No tree or shrub shall be placed or grown so as to \ cast a shadow greater than 10 percent of the collector absorption area upon that solar collector \ surface on the property of another at any one time between the hours of 10 a.m.and 2 p.m. FIGURE 17.76.020-2 SOLAR ORIENTATION N E3 F 1 5 (Code 1980, § 17.76.020; Ord. No. 855, §4, 2012) 2 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 17.76.030 Development standards for wind energy systems. A. General development standards. 1. Siting. Wind energy systems are prohibited on ridgelines. 2. Setbacks. All wind energy systems shall comply with existing setbacks for the zone in which it is located as well as any fire code setback requirements. 3. Color. Structural components including, but not limited to, towers and blades shall be of a nonreflective, unobtrusive color. 4. Guy wires. The use of guy wires is prohibited. Towers shall be self-supporting. 5. Utility connections. For interconnected systems, no wind energy system shall be installed until evidence has been notified and indicated that the proposed interconnection is acceptable. On- site electrical wires associated with the system shall be installed underground, except for "tie- ins" to the electric utility service provider and its transmission poles, towers and lines. 6. Exterior lighting. Exterior lighting on any wind energy system shall be prohibited unless specifically required by the Federal Aviation Administration. 7. Signs. No advertising sign or logo shall be placed or painted on any wind energy system, including towers and blades. 8. Noise. All wind energy systems are subject to noise standards as outlined in section 17.66.050 (Noise Standards). 9. Rotor safety. All wind energy systems must be equipped with manual and automatic over-speed controls to limit the rotational speed of the blades within the design limits of the rotor. 10. Electromagnetic interference.All wind energy systems shall be designed, installed and operated so that no distributing electromagnetic interference is caused. Disruptive interference from the facility shall be promptly rectified to include the discontinued operation of the wind energy system. 11. FAA regulations. All wind energy systems shall comply with applicable FAA regulations, including any necessary approvals for installations to close to airports. B. Residential site development standards. 1. Height. The maximum height for a small wind energy system is limited as follows: i. Freestanding systems shall not exceed 40 feet in height above grade level. ii. Roof-mounted systems shall not exceed 15 feet in height above the structure on which the system is mounted. 2. Number of systems. The maximum number of wind energy systems is limited as follows: i. Freestanding systems: One per parcel. ii. Roof-mounted systems: Two per parcel. C. Industrial site development standards. 1. Height. The maximum height for a small wind energy system is limited as follows: i. Freestanding systems shall not exceed 80100 feet above grade level measured from finished grade to the center of the turbine hub. ii. Roof-mounted systems shall not exceed 4525 feet in height measured from the center of the turbine hub to the roof surface above the structure on which the system is mounted. 2. Number of systems. The maximum number of wind energy systems is limited as follows: i. Freestanding systems: Two per parcel. ii. Roof-mounted systems: Four per parcel. 3. Tower access. Towers must provide one of the following: 3 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 i. Tower climbing apparatus located no closer than 12 feet from the ground; ii. Have an anti-climb device installed on the tower; iii. Provide a tower-access limitation program approved by the reviewing authority. D. Abandoned wind energy systems. Any wind energy system that is not used for a consecutive 12- month period shall be deemed abandoned. The property owner or permittee shall remove the wind energy system, clear the site of all equipment and restore the site as nearly as practicable to the condition prior to the installation of the wind energy system. 4 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 ARTICLE Vill. GLOSSARY Chapter 17.126 UNIVERSAL DEFINITIONS 17.126.010 Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to provide definitions for unique terms used throughout this title that are general in nature. (Code 1980, § 17.126.010; Ord. No. 855, §4, 2012) 17.126.020 Universal definitions. Parkinq StudV describes a report prepared bV a qualified traffic/parking engineer for review and acceptance bV the director of engineering services/city engineer and planning director that analyzes the amount of parking proposed for a site relative to the parking demand generated by a proposed use(s). The report may include calculations and recommendations for reducing the number of parking spaces for a proposed use(s) and an analysis of shared on-site parking. The report may include parking counts of vehicles parked in an area during selected days and times to evaluate the ratio of available parking spaces to the number of vehicles parked . A parking study may also provide details on any recommended transportation demand management measures. 1 DRAFT CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMENTS/ SUGGESTIONS TO PROPOSED INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Following are our initial comments and suggestions regarding the proposed Industrial Development Standards applicable to the Southeast Industrial Quadrant: 1. Building Height and FAR. We believe that removal of limitations on building height and increase in floor area ratios are positive steps. Regarding building height limitations, the development/end user community understands that there may be additional constraints based on proximity to Ontario International Airport. 2. 450,000 Square Feet Master Plan Threshold. We believe that the line of demarcation between projects not required to prepare a Master Plan and projects required to prepare a Master Plan should be 450,000 square feet, rather than 400,000 square feet. For the reasons we discussed, 450,000 square feet is a more logical line of demarcation. 3. Master Plan Flexibility. We believe that the development/end user community will accept the requirement of a Master Plan for projects in excess of 450,000 square feet, provided that the Master Plan process provides an avenue to deviate from the general development standards with satisfactory alternative standards. Because each user will have particular needs (i.e., reducing building sizes to allow more trailer storage spaces, in order to reduce trips to remote storage facilities), more passenger car parking spaces (depending on the nature of the operation) and less landscape coverage (i.e., to accommodate parking lot solar and EV charging facilities), flexibility is the best way to attract desirable users to the City. Inflexibility regarding street frontages on three sides of each building would be problematic, because it would constrain the placement of loading docks. Block network parameters and proximity of streets to railroad lines would similarly constrain site planning (i.e., the utility of a site adjacent to a railroad track would be diminished by an inflexible requirement for a street parallel to the track). Nevertheless, the development/end user community understands that it is appropriate for them to have the burden of proving to the City that each alternative industrial development standard is justified based on technical analysis. Requirements for vehicle parking, truck parking, trailer storage and onsite circulation should be determined using a Parking Demand Management Plan that is prepared in connection with each Master Plan. This requirement will promote parking strategies that are tailored to the user, with a focus on avoidance of truck queuing and the storage of trucks and trailers on City streets. This requirement will also promote designs that will be conducive to the safety of the occupants of the site once the user is identified (in relationship to shift changes and other events). Exhibit A I C1311-000--4077444.1 DRAFT As we discussed, end users are often not identified until the project is entitled or even in the early phases of construction. Accordingly, we suggest that the Master Plan process include an administrative minor revision process, so the requirements of the user can be accommodated in an efficient manner once the user has been identified. If the conditional use permit that is brought forward with the Master Plan contains the same flexibility, the development/end user community will accept it. 4. Alternative Enemy. While the development/end user community will accept mandatory renewable energy requirements (i.e., solar, EV charging, etc.), it should be recognized that these requirements are established by the end users and not the developers. End users have dramatically diverse energy demands needs. Accordingly, we suggest that a goal for energy offset be established, with the means of offset being left to either the developer or the end user. In that regard, we have seen the following language adopted in other jurisdictions: "Projects will be required to offset their energy demand by at least percent through the provision of renewable energy. The energy demand shall be determined at the initial building permit stage, if the end user is known at that time. If the end user is not known at that time, this condition should be deferred to the tenant improvement building permit and to subsequent tenant improvement permits as the end user changes. Utilizing the energy demand calculated, the appropriate amount of renewable energy must be included with the related building permits. Related to the initial building permit, the roof must be designed to accommodate rooftop mounted solar panels, whether or not solar panels are utilized to offset the energy demand." 5. Data Needs. Similar to alternative energy, data needs are established by the end users and not the developers. Accordingly, we suggest that each project include the conduit sufficient to accommodate the needs of a variety of end users. 6. Corridors. We discussed the need for an east-west corridor and a north-south corridor. These corridors will be expensive and will take significant time to plan and execute, due to conflicts with railroad facilities, utility-owned land and recently developed land. As you know, railroads and utility providers have the power of condemnation, which will impede the acquisition of the necessary right-of-way. We suggest that planning for these corridors start immediately and that the effort be supported by a community facilities district which includes land within the Southeast Industrial Quadrant, as well as within other areas that benefit from the corridors and that a bond be sized and issued that would cover the cost of construction. 2 C1311-000--4077444.1 DRAFT We also suggest that pending projects be allowed to proceed before the corridors are executed, subject to the projects demonstrating through the California Environmental Quality Act process that their traffic impacts can be acceptably mitigated. Otherwise, development(along with the corresponding economic benefits to the City and others) will be delayed and the current market cycle will be missed. 7. Wear and Tear on Roadways. In previous conversations, we discussed wear and tear on City roadways caused by truck usage. We suggest that a city-wide maintenance community facilities district be organized to cover that cost on a permanent basis. We also suggest that maintenance cost be carefully considered before additional streets are planned. 3 C1311-000--4077444.1 SEIQ Meeting - Proposed Agenda 1. Discussion of High-Level Objectives (City and Development Community) 2. Discussion of Master Plan Process 3. Discussion of SCAMD's Rule's 2305 (passed May 7, 2021) a. WAIRE — Warehouse Actions and Investments to Reduce Emissions (WAIRE) Program is a flexible points system to encourage environmentally friendly practices. Large warehouses would be required to accrue a certain number of points, based on annual truck trips to and from that facility. Points could be earned through emissions-curbing actions, or the warehouse could instead pay a fee. 4. Discussion of Potential Revisions to Draft Development Standards (examples below) 5. Discussion of Street Network Challenges and Solutions 6. Next Steps VARIANCE FROM DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Mun. Code,§17.14.060;Table 17.14.060-1,Note 2 (2) A variance from a development standard in the industrial zoning districts requires approval by the city council, except as approved as part of the master plan process set forth in Municipal Code sections 17.22.020,et seq. BLOCK NETWORK PARAMETERS Mun. Code, §17.36.040(D)(9)(a)(ii) 9. Design standards. The following design standards apply to all new developments in the Neo- Industrial(NI) and Industrial Employment(IE) Zoning Districts: ii. Block Network Parameters for Public Streets. • Intersection spacing along arterial edges shall be between 1/8 mile and 1/4 mile with at least one mid-block intersection between intersecting arterials and rail, flood control, utility or freeway corridors. • Intersection spacing inside arterial/arterial blocks bounded by arterials shall be a minimum of 200 feet and a maximum of 1,320 feet. • Buildings greater than 400,000 sq. ft.in size shall have public streets on at least 3 sides. • A minimum of 1 public street shall run parallel with and within 500 feet of rail (excluding spurs), flood control, utility, or freeway corridors. The parallel street shall run through the block. Street crossings at intersecting corridors shall be established on a case-by-case basis based on feasibility and needs by the City Engineer. • Intersections along arterials shall be aligned with existing/proposed intersections on the opposite side of the arterial where possible and meet minimum design standards for offsets or clearance from adjacent corridors as required by the City Engineer. • Two distinct points of connection shall be provided through an internal block network to the arterial street network for every industrial parcel. • Alterations or deviations from the foregoing standards may be approved by the City Council as part of the master plan process for industrial buildings larger than 400,000 square feet in gross floor area set forth in Municipal Code sections 17.22.020, et seq. The additional language in red font above acknowledges the City's flexibility to consider deviations from the otherwise strict street network parameters required under the new Development Code Update as part of the holistic master plan process. This will ensure the City's continuing ability and authority to prioritize street access for public safety and circulation and mitigation of traffic impacts from new industrial projects on both a project- level and area-level basis while also providing industrial developers, in collaboration with City staff and subject to ultimate City Council approval a mechanism to obtain relief from some of these standards as related to a particular project. SOLAR COLLECTOR SYSTEM AND SHADE STRUCTURE PARKING REQUIREMENTS Mun. Code,§17.76.020(B) In the Neo-Industrial (NI) and Industrial Employment (IE) Zoning Districts a solar collector system for the purposes of generating a minimum of 75 percent of the anticipated electricity demand for the use and a minimum of 75 percent of the demand for heating water must be provided on all new industrial developments. If roof mounted, the solar systems must cover a minimum of 80 percent of the roof area of all buildings and structures and be designed to be within 22.5 degrees east or west of true south to ensure maximum efficiency for the solar energy system. Solar collectors may also be installed on support structures that provide shade over parking areas (See section 17.56.060.N.1.b (Exceptions for solar collectors)). The requirement for 80 percent solar coverage of roof area for all new industrial projects is not feasible due to fundamental site constraints and is greater than necessary to provide even 100 percent electrical demand for a proposed industrial building; however, stakeholders support incorporating some form of renewable requirement for new projects. Mun. Code,§17.36.040(1))(9)(a)(iiI) Surface parking stalls for employees and guests shall incorporate shade structures that are capable of supporting solar/photovoltaic array systems with a minimum clearance height of 12 feet.A minimum of 50 percent of the required parking stalls shall include these shade structures for this purpose. The requirement for shade structures that can support solar array systems for fifty percent (50%) of parking stalls for all new industrial projects is not feasible; however, stakeholders support incorporating some form of solar capability for parking shade structures. Mun. Code,§17.36.040 8.c The visibility of any equipment from the public right-of-way shall be determined by"line-of sight" and measured from a point that is 6 feet above the finished surface of the centerline of the adjacent public right-of-way,e.g. street. 9.a.i Sites shall have internal sidewalks where possible that connect to sidewalks along public streets to create pedestrian connections. a.iii Surface parking stalls for employees and guests shall incorporate shade structures where possible that are capable of supporting solar/photovoltaic array systems with a minimum clearance height of 12 feet. A minimum of 25 percent of the required parking stalls shall include these shade structures for this purpose or a 50 percentage shading through landscaping with equal solar photovoltaic on the roof b. iv For office portions of principle buildings,window and door openings must comprise at least 60 percent of the total area of exterior walls facing a public street of the defined office wall area. Additional Solar Comments: Net Metered Interconnection - the electrical generation is consumed on site, so future tenant(s) would be the offtaker. Grid Offtake - electricity would be sold into the wholesale market A typical industrial building would only justify a -2.2 MW system, which would only use <15% of the roof. • We've historically thought of warehouse space to utilize around 3.5kWh/sq ft annually. This number may actually be high, given the required volume of natural daylighting required in CA, and also with the lower lighting power density required using LED fixtures. I can dig deeper here, but assuming 3.5kWh/sq ft, this warehouse would utilize -3,500,OOOkWh per year. o Assuming an annual yield of 1,600kWh/kW-DC installed, this would require a 2,188kW-DC (or 2.188MW-DC)PV system to meet 100% of the annual demand. o Using a conventionally racked rooftop mounting system, we're averaging around 15watts-DC/sq ft for rooftop construction. Using this number, we'd need 145,866 sq ft of rooftop to achieve this system size. 145,866/1,028,994 = 14.17% of the roof Regarding the system orientation, a system facing more East/West rather than South will make better economic sense for not just the solar developer/owner, but also to the grid as a whole. This would generate more kWh in the early/later hours, as compared to maximizing peak production at twelve noon, which exacerbates the "duck curve" overproduction issue that California is experiencing. PV generation is actually being curtailed in California as a result of the due South orientation of legacy PV systems. While it is true that systems oriented to the South will produce the most energy, East-West systems are often deployed to provide for a smoother production curve, which can be beneficial to not only the end use, but to the utility. Solar modules attached directly to carport "decks" are less efficient due to the heat from the back of modules. TRAILER STORAGE AND LOADING REQUIREMENTS FOR INDUSTRIAL USES Mun. Code,§17.64.100(C) Required loading spaces for industrial uses. Except as approved by the City Council as part of the master plan process for industrial buildings larger than 400,000 square feet in gross floor area, all industrial uses shall provide a minimum of one loading space per proposed loading bay. For each loading bay proposed, a minimum of one on-site truck queuing space must be provided. Each on-site truck queuing space shall be a minimum of nine feet in width and 65 feet in length and shall be included on the circulation management plan if required by the approving authority. The truck queuing spaces shall be grouped together in a designated area with clear access to loading bays." (Mun. Code, § 17.64.100(C).) The requirement for one loading space per proposed loading bay for all new industrial projects is not feasible due to fundamental site constraints and does not support how modern industrial buildings function from an operational standpoint. In lieu of this requirement, stakeholders propose the addition of language providing for the reduction/relaxation of this standard as part of the City's master plan process for large-scale industrial buildings (see red font above). The City should identify specific uses that generate extraordinary tractor trailer volume such as cold storage facilities and fulfillment centers. These facilities should demonstrate the required trailer parking spaces and truck queuing. These industrial users typically purchase adjoining or nearby parcels to provide the necessary trailer parking. To require all industrial buildings to comply with the worst case scenario is not economically feasible. Mun. Code,§17.64.100(D)(4) Trailer parking required. Except as approved by the City Council as part of the master plan process for industrial buildings larger than 400,000 square feet in gross floor area, one parking space of parking for a trailer is required for each loading dock door. The minimum dimensions of a single trailer parking space is 50 feet in length, 14 feet in width, and 14 feet in vertical clearance. Trailer parking spaces shall be located in a designated area located away from the loading bays and paths of travel. All trailer parking areas must be screened according to the provisions of section 17.48.050 (Requirements by land use type) for industrial areas. The requirement for one trailer parking space per proposed loading dock door for all new industrial projects is not feasible due to fundamental site constraints and does not support how modern industrial buildings function from an operational standpoint. In lieu of this requirement, stakeholders propose the addition of language providing for the reduction/relaxation of this standard as part of the City's master plan process for large-scale industrial buildings (see red font above). Mun. Code,§17.64.120(D) Electric vehicles in Industrial Zoning Districts. Except as approved by the City Council as part of the master plan process for industrial buildings larger than 400,000 square feet in gross floor area, a minimum of 10 percent of required parking in all new developments within the Industrial Zoning Districts for employees and guests shall be reserved for electric vehicles.... One charging station shall be installed for every two spaces dedicated to electric vehicles. Additionally, charging stations for electric powered trucks may be required as determined by the approving authority." The requirement for a minimum of 10 percent of parking for all new industrial projects to be reserved for electric vehicles and one charging station for every two electric vehicle stalls is not feasible due to fundamental site constraints and does not support how modern industrial buildings function from an operational standpoint. In lieu of this requirement, stakeholders propose the addition of language providing for the reduction/relaxation of this standard as part of the City's master plan process for large-scale industrial buildings (see red font above). The Green Building Code already provides stringent standards for EV parking and charging. SPECIAL PARKING LOT LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS Mun. Code,§17.56.060(N)(1) Parking lot landscape. Parking lot landscape includes perimeter planters, abutting parking lots and drive aisles, tree planting for parking lot shade, and a combination of continuous planting strips, planting fingers, and parking islands throughout the parking lot. Parking lot landscape requirements applicable to commercial, industrial, mixed-use, and multi-family residential parking lots with five or more spaces are listed below: 1. Number of trees required. Trees shall be required at a rate of one tree for every three parking stalls. At maturity, trees should reach a minimum height and spread of 40 feet so as to form a shade canopy over parking stalls. Smaller ornamental trees may not be used to satisfy this requirement.The minimum width for planters containing a parking lot tree is six feet. Tree selections shall be approved by the planning director. a. Number of trees required in industrial zoning districts. Except as approved by the City Council as part of the master plan process for industrial buildings larger than 400,000 square feet in gross floor area, trees shall be required at a rate of one tree for every five parking stalls within a planter area that is a minimum of 10 feet in width. Tree clusters may be used subject to approval by the approving authority. b. Exception for solar collectors. Except as approved by the City Council as part of the master plan process for industrial buildings larger than 400,000 square feet in gross floor area, the minimum requirement for trees and shrubs in Industrial Zoning Districts shall be waived for the portion of a parking area over which photo-voltaic solar collectors are installed where they also function as shade structures. The requirement for one tree for very five parking stalls for all new industrial projects is not feasible. In lieu of this requirement, stakeholders propose alternative language providing for the reduction/relaxation of this standard as part of the City's master plan process for large-scale industrial buildings (see red font above). RESOLUTION NO. 21-37 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT DRC2021-00170 TO MODIFY ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES, AMEND LAND USES AND DEFINITIONS AND CREATE 'NEW DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF A. Recitals. 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared Municipal Cade Amendment DRC2021- 001.70, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Municipal Code Amendment is referred to as"the Application". 2. On May 26, 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is 'hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A of this Resolution, are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to the Planning Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on May 26, 2021, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The City Council adopted an Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 976, establishing a moratorium on new industrial building development on properties in all industrial zones within the "Southeast Industrial Quadrant" (SEIQ) of the City and within 500 feet of the public right-of-way of a segment of Foothill Boulevard between Haven Avenue and Milliken Avenue. On December 16, 2020, the City Council,extended the Interim Urgency Ordinance to June30, 2021; b. This interim ordinance was developed as staff observed an increase in the level of development interest in the SEIQ and along Foothill Boulevard. The SEIQ has been dominated by "legacy" uses and tenants on significantly large properties with limited infrastructure.,These uses/tenants have been present since before the City's incorporation in 1977. Similarly, there are multiple smaller properties in the SEIQ developed with, for example, small manufacturing businesses, storage yards, and non-conforming residences. Many of these properties are relatively under-developed, i.e. they are not developed to their maximum potential; C. The Council determined that a strategic pause on industrial development in the SEIQ and along Foothill Boulevard was appropriate and would,provide staff time to review our development standards, consider work being done on the General Plan as well as engage the Exhibit C PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-37 MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT DRC2021-00170—CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA May 26, 2021 Page 2 industrial development community to understand their needs and find common ground to ensure a robust, diverse industrial sector which can provide employment and services for local residents and generate positive economic outcomes for the City; d. The proposed updates will apply uniformly to all industrial zones throughout the City, not just the areas impacted by the moratorium; e. The City prepared a set of amendments (the "Amendments"), which is included as Attachment A to this Resolution and is hereby incorporated by this reference as if set forth in full; f. Development Code Amendment DRC2021-00170 conforms to and does not conflict with the General Plan, including without limitation, the Land Use Element thereof, and will provide for development in a manner consistent with the General Plan; and 3. The Planning Department staff has determined that the project is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies under the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects, which have the potential for causing significant effect on the environment. Pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(B)(3), where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. The consolidation of zoning districts, changes to the entitlement process and the elimination of higher impact industrial uses from the land use table will impose greater limitations on industrial development than exist today and will thereby serve to eliminate potentially significant adverse environmental impacts. The implementation of requirements for solar collector systems for new industrial development will provide a renewable electric resource for the development and reduce dependence on non-renewable electric resources. Requiring development electric vehicle charging infrastructure will encourage use of electric vehicles for industrial uses, reducing GHG emissions in future developments. These requirements impose greater limitations on industrial development than exist today and will thereby serve to eliminate potentially significant adverse environmental impacts. Each of these components, individually and cumulatively, does not result in the possibility of creating significant to cumulative effects on the environment. Future development subject to these provisions will be reviewed for CEQA compliance under separate entitlements or actions as proposed by these code updates. During the entitlement process, the applicant will be required to comply with CEQA. In reviewing each project for compliance with CEQA, an applicant may be required to submit environmental studies that analyze potential impacts such as air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, noise levels, and transportation/traffic caused by the site-specific project. On a case-by-case review of each project, the appropriate environmental document will be prepared to address project-specific impacts. Based on this evidence and all the evidence in the record, the Planning Commission concurs with the Planning Department staffs determination that the Amendment will not have a significant effect on the environment and is therefore exempt from further environmental review under CEQA. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve Municipal Code Amendment DRC2021-00170 as indicated in Attachment A incorporated herein by this reference. 5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2021-37 MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT DRC2021-00170—CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA May 26, 2021 Page 3 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF MAY 2021. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Tony Guglielmo, Chairman ATTEST: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary I, Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 26'h day of May 2021, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 ARTICLE II. LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT PROCEDURES Chapter 17.14 GENERAL APPLICATION PROCESSING PROCEDURES Sections: 17.14.010 Purpose. 17.14.020 Application and fee. 17.14.030 Determination of completeness. 17.14.040 Application review and report. 17.14.050 Public hearing and public notice. 17.14.060 Approving authority. 17.14.070 Appeals. 17.14.080 Effective date. 17.14.090 Permit time limits, extensions, and expiration. 17.14.100 Modification. 17.14.110 Revocation. 17.14.120 Reapplications. 17.14.050 Public hearing and public notice. A. Public hearing required. The following procedures shall govern the notice and public hearing, where required pursuant to this title. The designated approving authority shall hold a public hearing to consider all applications for conditional use permits, variances, major design review, tentative subdivision maps, planned communities, specific plans, zoning code/map amendments, prezoning, development agreements, and general plan amendments considered by the planning commission or city council. B. Notice of hearing. Pursuant to Government Code §§ 65090 to 65094, not less than ten days before the scheduled date of a hearing, public notice shall be given of such hearing in the manner listed below. The notice shall state the date, time, and place of hearing, identify the hearing body, and provide a general description of the matter to be considered and the real property which is the subject of the hearing. 1. Notice of public hearing shall be published in at least one newspaper of general circulation in the city. 2. Except as otherwise provided herein, notice of the public hearing shall be mailed, postage prepaid, to the owners of property within a radius of 660 feet of the exterior boundaries of the property involved in the application, using for this purpose the last known name and address of such owners as shown upon the current tax assessor's records. The radius may be increased as determined to be necessary and desirable by the planning director based on the nature of the proposed project. If the number of owners exceeds 1,000, the city may, in lieu of mailed notice, provide notice by placing notice of at least one-eighth page in one newspaper of general circulation within the city. 3. Notice of the public hearing shall be mailed, postage prepaid, to the owner of the subject real property or the owner's authorized agent and to each local agency expected to provide water, sewerage, streets, roads, schools, or other essential facilities or services to the proposed project. 1 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 4. Notice of the public hearing shall be posted on the project site not more than 300 feet apart along the project perimeter fronting on improved public streets. 5. Notice of the public hearing shall be posted at city hall. 6. Notice of the public hearing shall be mailed to any person who has filed a written request for notice. 7. In addition to the notice required by this section, the city may give notice of the hearing in any other manner it deems necessary or desirable. 17.14.060 Approving authority. A. Designated approving authority. The approving authority as designated in Table 17.14.060-1 (Approving Authority for Land Use Entitlements) shall approve, conditionally approve, or deny the proposed land use or development permit or entitlement in accordance with the requirements of this title. Table 17.14.060-1 (Approving Authority for Land Use Entitlements) identifies recommending (R) and final (F) authorities for each permit or entitlement. In acting on a permit, the approving authority shall make all required findings. An action of the approving authority may be appealed pursuant to procedures set forth in section 17.14.070 (Appeals). B. Multiple entitlements. When a proposed project requires more than one permit with more than one approving authority, all project permits shall be processed concurrently and final action shall be taken by the highest-level designated approving authority for all such requested permits. Projects that require legislative approvals (e.g., zoning code/map amendment, general plan Amendment) may go to the city council as stand-alone items with the associated quasi-judicial approvals stopping at planning commission. C. Referral to the planning commission. At any point in the application review process, the planning director may transfer decision making authority to the planning commission at his/her discretion because of policy implications, unique or unusual circumstances, or the magnitude of the project. Decisions referred to the planning commission shall be considered a�at a noticed public hearing. A referral to another decision-maker is not an appeal and requires no appeal application or fee. 2 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 TABLE 17.14.060-1 APPROVING AUTHORITY FOR LAND USE ENTITLEMENTS Type of Permit or Decision Designated Approving Authority"R"_ "Recommending Body""F"_ "Final Decision-Making Body" Planning Historic Planning Director Preservation Commission City Council Commission Official code interpretation F Plan check/zoning clearance F Home occupation permit F Sign permit F Temporary use permit F Tree removal permit F Uniform sign program F Similar use determination F Reasonable accommodation F Site development review F Minor exception F Minor use permit F Conditional use permit R F' F ' Minor design review F Hillside development review F Large family day care permit F Mills Act R R F Landmark designation R R F Certificate of appropriateness R F Certificate of economic hardship R F Entertainment permit F Design review R F Variance R F? F 2 Adult entertainment permit R F Tentative subdivision map (see title 16) R F Planned community R R F Specific plan R R F Prezoning R R F Development Code/zoning map R R F amendment Development agreement R R F General plan amendment R R F Master plan R R F 3 3 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 ' Conditional use permit approval by the city council is required for all industrial buildings larger than 75,000 square feet in gross floor area, in which case,the planning commission shall be the recommending body. 2 A variance from a development standard in the industrial zoning districts requires approval by the city council,in which case the planning commission shall be the recommending body.. 3 A master plan is required for all industrial buildings larger than 450,000 square feet in gross floor area.See Section 17.22.020 (Master plan). 17.14.090 Permit time limits, extensions, and expiration. A. Time limits. Unless a condition of approval or other provision of this title establishes a different time limit, any permit not exercised within two years of approval shall expire and become void, except where an extension of time is approved pursuant to this section. B. Exercising permits. The exercise of a permit occurs when the property owner has performed substantial work as determined by the planning director and the building official and incurred substantial liabilities in good faith reliance upon such permit(s). A permit may be otherwise exercised pursuant to a condition of the permit or corresponding legal agreement that specifies that other substantial efforts or expenditures constitutes exercise of the permit. Unless otherwise provided, permits that have not been exercised prior to a zoning amendment, which would make the permitted use or structure nonconforming, shall automatically be deemed invalid on the effective date of the zoning amendment. C. Permit extensions. The approval of an extension extends the expiration date for two years from the original permit date. After this initial permit extension, a final one-year extension of time may be granted pursuant to the same process as set forth in this section. 1. Process. The same approving authority that granted the original permit may extend the period within which the exercise of a permit must occur. Notice and/or public hearing shall be provided in the same manner as for the original permit. An application for extension shall be filed not less than 30 days prior to the expiration date of the permit, along with appropriate fees and application submittal materials. 2. Conditions. The permit, as extended, may be conditioned to comply with any development standards that may have been enacted since the permit was initially approved. 3. Permit extension findings. The extension may be granted only when the designated approving authority finds that the original permit findings can still be made and there are no changed circumstances or there has been diligent pursuit to exercise the permit that warrants such extension. 4. Expiration. If the time limits are reached with no extension requested, or a requested extension is denied or expires, the permit expires. D. Permit expiration for a closed business. All permits and entitlements shall expire when a business is closed for more than one calendar year. Approval of new permits and entitlements based on current requirements shall be required prior to any business activity on the site. 17.14.100 Modification. A. Any person holding a permit granted under this title may request a modification to that permit. For the purpose of this section, the modification of a permit may include modification of the terms of the 4 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 permit itself, project or site design, or the waiver or alteration of conditions imposed in the granting of the permit. B. If the planning director determines that a proposed project action is not in substantial conformance with the original approval, the planning director shall notify the property owner of the requirement to submit a permit modification application to the Planning Department. _ C. The planning director may review and approve the permit modification application provided the proposed modifications will not cause any of the following to occur: 1. A change in the character, scope, size, and/or intensity of the development and/or use; 2. A significant increase in impacts on infrastructure or traffic on roadways adjacent to or external to the proposed development and/or use; 3. A change in the external impacts on adjacent property: and 4. A reduction in the originally approved setbacks from property lines or increase in building or structure height. D. If the planning director determines that the proposed permit modification does not comply with the provisions of subsection C above, the same approving authority as the original permit shall review the permit modification application. E. A permit modification may be granted only when the approving authority makes all findings required for the original approval. 5 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 Chapter 17.16 PLANNING DIRECTOR DECISIONS Sections: 17.16.010 Purpose and applicability. 17.16.020 Official Code interpretations. 17.16.025 Director determination process (with notice). 17.16.030 Plan check/zoning clearance. 17.16.040 Home occupation permit. 17.16.050 Sign permit. 17.16.060 Uniform sign program. 17.16.070 Temporary use permit. 17.16.080 Tree removal permit. 17.16.090 Similar use determination. 17.16.100 Site development review. 17.16.110 Minor exceptions. 17.16.120 ConditionaiMinOr use permit. 17.16.130 Minor design review. 17.16.140 Hillside development review. 17.16.150 Reasonable accommodation. 17.16.160 Large family day care permit. 17.16.170 Entertainment permit. 17.16.025 Director determination process (with notice). A. Purpose. Certain administrative permits and entitlements decided by the planning director require a notice to neighboring property owners. B. Applicability. Notice for director determination shall be provided for the following applications: 1. Tree removal permit(only if six or more). 2. Minor exceptions. 3. Minor Conditional use permits. /1 Large family Glad Gore C. Notice of application. Notice of an application for a tree removal permit for six or more trees, minor exceptions, and minor use permits, shall be given in compliance with the requirements of this section. The notice shall specify that the application will be decided by the city following an open public comment period where comment is received on or before a date specified in the notice which shall be ten days after the date of mailing. This notice shall also include an explanation of appeal rights. 1. Notice of the filing of an application for those applications identified in subsection B of this section shall be mailed to persons owning property within 660 feet of the property lines of the project site. 2. Notice of the filing of an application for a minor use permit to authorize uses and activities in the Neo-Industrial (NI) and Industrial Employment OE) industrial zones shall be mailed to persons owning property within 1,500 feet of the property lines of the project site 3. Notice of the filing of an application for tree removal permits or minor exceptions shall be mailed to persons owning property adjacent to the protect site. D. Decision. The director may approve, approve with conditions, or deny applications listed in this section. Decisions shall be based on standards and criteria set forth within this Code and shall be 6 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 accompanied by brief, written findings and a determination. Planning director decisions listed in section 17.16.025.13 (Applicability) above may be appealed to the planning commission. 17.16.110 Minor exceptions. A. Purpose. Exceptions may be needed to certain provisions to allow creative design solutions and to accommodate unique site conditions. B. Applicability. A minor exception may be granted to modify certain requirements of this Code, as listed in Table 17.16.110-1 (Standards Subject to Exception). Exceptions do not apply to land use and are not intended to waive a specific prohibition or procedural requirement. Additionally, a minor exception may be granted for exemptions from development standards for the repurposing or reuse of industrial warehouse and other large footprint buildings for alternative uses not envisioned when the structure was originally built, provided the use satisfies any allowed use and permit requirements provided in section 17.30.030 (Allowed Land Uses and Permit Requirements). TABLE 17.16.110-1 STANDARDS SUBJECT TO EXCEPTION Standard Maximum Reduction or Increase Maximum fence/wall height 2-foot increase Minimum amount of Pparking or loading spaces— o * Number required 25/o reduction Setbacks(increase) 10% reduction Maximum lot coverage fincease} 10% increase Maximum height ('RGrease) 10% increase *A proposed reduction in excess of 10%for industrial uses requires the completion of a parking study prepared by the City and paid for by the applicant to ensure the reduction will not cause a significant impact on nearby streets or other properties. C. Review process. An application for a minor exception shall be filed with the planning department in a manner prescribed by the planning director with the required fee as established by city council resolution. D. Public notice. The planning director shall, not less than ten days before rendering a decision, provide for public comment through notice to adjacent property owners of the pending application. E. Findings. The planning director shall approve, or approve with conditions, an application for an exception after finding all of the following. 1. The minor exception is consistent with the general plan or any applicable specific plan or development agreement. 2. The proposed development is compatible with existing and proposed land uses in the surrounding area. 3. The proposed exception to the specific development standard(s) is necessary to allow creative design solutions compatible with the desires of the community and/or accommodate unique site conditions. 4. The granting of the minor exception will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district, and will not be detrimental to public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. If the planning director does not make all of these findings, then the director shall deny the minor exception. F. Conditions. In approving a minor exception, the director may impose any reasonable conditions to ensure that the approval will comply with the findings required, as well as any performance criteria and development standards contained within this Code. 7 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 17.16.120 MinorConditional use permit. A. Purpose. The minor use permit provides a process for director review and determination of requests for uses and activities whose effects on adiacent sites and surroundings must be evaluated. These uses and activities -generally meet the purposes of the applicable zoning district but w4s require special consideration in their design or operation to ensure compatibility with surrounding or potential future uses. whose effects on adjacent sites and G61FFGURd'RgG Reed to be evaluated in terms o cnonifin development proposal for the specific site. It is anticipated that uses qualifying for a conditional minor use permit are minor in nature, only have an impact on immediately adjacent properties, and can be modified and/or conditioned to ensure compatibility. B. Applicability. This section applies to land use requiring a minorGE)Rditienal use permit as designated with an "MS"on the allowed use table (Table 17.30.030-1). C. Review process. An application for a conditional minor use permit shall be filed with the planning department in a manner prescribed by the planning director with the required fee as established by city council resolution. The planning director is the approving authority for conditional minoruse permits. However, the planning director may also refer a minor sond+tional use permit to the planning commission for review and approval as-pursuant to section 17.14.060.0 (Referral to the Planning Commission). D. Findings.The director shall approve, or approve with conditions, an application for a minor gend+tienal use permit after finding all of the following. 1. The proposed use is allewed within the appliGable ZGRiRg diStFiGt and GeMplies with all other specifiG plans OF city r ulatiens/standards aGGeGG:2. The- Site 06 phyGiGally suited f4gr the type, deRSity, and inteRsity of the piceposed Use utilities, and the absenGe of physical constraints and can he renditioned to Meet related perfermaRce criteria and development standard Granting the permit WOU'd Ret be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, er welfare, er maternally iRjUF1eUS to persons, propert,, overnents On the vicinity On which 1. The subject site is suitable for the type and intensity of use or development proposed, and the proposed location, size, and design of the use are compatible with adjacent uses or with natural resources; 2. The operating characteristics of the proposed use, including traffic, noise, light, and other characteristics, will be in keeping with the character of the neighborhood and other adjacent uses or uses in the vicinity; 3. The proposed improvements of the site, including building design, height and bulk of buildings, setbacks, fencing, landscaping, signage size and location, are compatible with the surrounding neighborhood or area; 4. That the proposed use shall not result in conditions that would be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare of the community; 5. Adequate public facilities and services are available to serve the proposed use or will be made available concurrent with the proposed development; 6. Allowing the proposed use at the proposed location would be consistent with and help achieve the goals, objectives, and policies of the general plan and the development code; and 7. The project would not result in a negative effect to the City's land use inventory available for residential and economic development, consistent with the intent of the general plan land use element. If the director does not make all of these findings, then the director shall deny the minor use permit. E. Conditions. In approving a cenditienal minor use permit, the director may impose any reasonable conditions to ensure that the approval will comply with the findings required, as well as any performance criteria and development standards contained within this Code. Chapter 17.20 8 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 PLANNING COMMISSION DECISIONS Sections: 17.20.010 Purpose. 17.20.020 Entertainment permit. 17.20.030 Variance. 17.20.040 Design review. 17.20.050 Adult entertainment permit. 17.20.060 Conditional use permit 17.20.040 Design review. A. Purpose. This section establishes the review procedures for residential, commercial, industrial, and institutional development proposals to facilitate project review by local responsible agencies and the development/design review committees in a timely and efficient manner; to ensure that development projects comply with all applicable local design guidelines, standards, and ordinances; to minimize adverse effects on surrounding properties and the environment; and to maintain consistency with the general plan, which promotes high aesthetic and functional standards to complement and add to the physical, economic, and social character of the city. In addition, the city finds that a design review process will support the implementation of the general plan, as it stresses quality community design standards.The city further finds that the quality of certain residential, institutional, commercial, and industrial uses has a substantial impact upon the visual appeal, environmental soundness, economic stability, and property values of the city. This section is not intended to restrict imagination, innovation, or variety, but rather to focus on community design principles which can result in creative imaginative solutions for the project and a quality design for the city. It is the purpose of this section to: 1. Recognize the interdependence of land values and aesthetics and provide a method by which the city may implement this interdependence to its benefit. 2. Encourage the orderly and harmonious appearance of structures and property within the city along with associated facilities, such as signs, landscaping, parking areas, and streets. 3. Maintain the public health, safety and general welfare, and property throughout the city. 4. Assist private and public developments to be more cognizant of public concerns for the aesthetics of development. 5. Reasonably ensure that new developments, including residential, institutional, commercial, and industrial developments, do not have an adverse aesthetic, health, safety, or architecturally related impact upon existing adjoining properties, or the city in general. 6. Implement those sections of the city's general plan that specifically refer to the preservation and enhancement of the particular character and unique assets of this city and its harmonious development. 7. Minimize the effects of grading by discouraging mass grading and excessive slopes to ensure that the natural character of terrain is retained. 8. Preserve significant topographic features, including rock outcroppings, native plant materials, and natural hydrology, while also encouraging improved drainage from lots directly to a street, storm drain, or through a public or privately maintained easement. 9. Limit the impact of slopes on adjacent developed properties and limit construction on identified seismic or geologic hazard areas. 9 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 10. Encourage the use of a variety of housing styles, split-level grading techniques, varied lot sizes, site design densities, maintenance of views, and arrangement and spacing to accomplish grading policies. 11. Help ensure that adequate school facilities for all existing and future residential development the city are provided 112. Help i„emu eensure that adequate levels of public services are provided for existing and future development in the city. 123. Encourage orderly development of residences within areas more readily served by public services. 134. Encourage the development of master planned projects that provide the service needs of the residents of these projects. 146. Encourage the use of energy conservation techniques in all new devete�residential, mixed use, institutional commercial, and industrial-development. B. Applicability. An application for design review is required for commercial, industrial, institutional, and residential projects with five or more dwelling „RitS involving the issuance of a building permit for construction or reconstruction of a structure which meets the following criteria. 1. New construction on vacant property where the proposed buildings are over 10,000 square fee in soze 20 2 Str,int, ral additions or new buildings whiGh are equal te eF eXGeed 50 perniant Af thp floor area of existing o site buildings) „r have a MOROM61M 10,000 square foot 'R 2. RP_r_,A_.nstF61GtiGR pFeJerts whirh are equal to 50 PeFGeRt of the floor area of existing on site buildiRg(S) or h-a„o a mipimum 10,000 square foot OR 1. New construction of residential projects with five or more dwelling units 2. New single or multiple building construction, on a vacant property or parcel/lot, with an overall (or, if multiple buildings, combined)floor area of 10,001 square feet or greater. 3. Structural additions to an existing building where the addition has a floor area that is 50 percent or more of the floor area of the existing building. 4. New building construction, on a developed property or parcel/lot, with an overall (or, if multiple buildings, combined)floor area of 10,001 square feet or greater. 5. Reconstruction projects which are greater than 50 percent of the floor area of an existing building (or, if multiple buildings, 50 percent of their combined floor area) or with a floor area of 10,001 square feet or greater. 64. Any project being proposed along a special boulevard as defined by the general plan, except for structures within projects with an approved master plan. 76. All projects which are master planned. Once the master plan, including architectural guidelines, has been approved by the planning commission, individual structures may be approved by the planning director. 86. All shopping centers over 10,000 square feet in size, except individual structures may be approved by the planning director where a master plan, including architectural guidelines, has been approved by the planning commission. 97-. Certain projects within a hillside area are subject to review pursuant to section 17.52 (Hillside Development). 106. All projects within Mixed Use Zoning Districts. Projects of a limited size and scope that do not meet these criteria may require an application for minor design review as defined in section 17.16.130 (Minor Design Review). 10 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 C. Review process. The design review procedure is outlined below. 1. Scheduling for committee review. Upon acceptance of a complete application for design review approval, a project shall be scheduled et on the first avertable agenda for committee review. The applicant and any persons requesting notice will be notified at least ten days prior to the committee meetings_.. 2. All development proposals submitted pursuant to this section are reviewed by the design review committee, which will make a recommendation on the project to the planning commission. Review and analysis by the design review committee will consider design elements, such as, but not limited to, compatibility of the project to surrounding properties, relationship of the design and layout of the project to the site, architectural design, and use of materials, grading, landscaping, screening and buffering techniques of adjacent properties, signs, and open space. The is--design review committee will determine if the project adequately meets city design guidelines and standards and will transmit an appropriate recommendation to the planning commission. The design review committee shall review the project design submittals and make recommendations to the planning d+reEtorcommission based on: i. Design and layout of the proposed development is consistent with the applicable elements of the city's general plan, design guidelines of the appropriate district, and any adopted architectural criteria for specialized area,such as designated historic districts,theme areas, specific plans, community plan, boulevards, or planned developments. ii. The design and layout of the proposed development will not unreasonably interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring, existing, or future developments, and will not create traffic or pedestrian hazards. iii. The architectural design of the proposed development is compatible with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and will maintain the harmonious, orderly, and attractive development contemplated by this section and the general plan of the city. iv. The design of the proposed development would provide a desirable environment for its occupants and the visiting public as well as its neighbors through good aesthetic use of materials, texture, and color that will remain aesthetically appealing and will retain a reasonably adequate level of maintenance. 3. Proposals submitted pursuant to this section may also require review by other necessary committees as applicable (e.g., trails). D. Findings.The planning commission shall make the following findings before approving a design review application: 1. The proposed project is consistent with the general plan and any applicable specific plan; 2. The proposed rp eject-use is in accord with the objective of this Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; 3. The proposed rp olect—use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of this Development Code; and 4. The proposed rp oject use, together with any applicable the-conditions applicable the re+n will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. E. Planning commission decision and cSonditions. The planning commission is authorized to approve or deny applications and to impose reasonable conditions upon such approval, as the commission may deem necessary to ensure compatibility with surrounding uses, to preserve the public health, safety, and welfare, and to enable the commission to make the findings required by section 17.20.040.D (Findings). 11 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 17.20.060 Conditional use permit A. Purpose. The purpose of a conditional use permit is to provide a public review process for the discretionary review of proposed uses and activities that require special consideration to ensure that their effects are compatible with locational, use, structural, traffic, and/or the characteristics of neighboring properties and the community. This discretionary review process is intended to ensure land use compatibility and to mitigate potential impacts or conflicts that could otherwise result from the proposed use. More specifically, a conditional use permit is intended to: 1. To consider the relationship of the use or project to the surrounding area, neighborhood, and community as a whole; 2. To determine if the proiect's use and location is compatible with the types of uses that are normally permitted in the surrounding area; 3. To consider the compatibility of the proposed use with the site's characteristics; 4. To evaluate the adequacy of services and facilities for the proposed use; 5. To provide an opportunitV for public review and comment on the proposed use; and 6. To identify conditions and requirements necessary to comply with the basic purposes of this Code, the General Plan, and any applicable plans or regulations B. Applicability. This section applies to any land use requiring a conditional use permit as designated with a "C" on the allowed use table (Table 17.30.030-1). Any development subject to approval of a conditional use permit must comply with all applicable requirements of this Section. C. Application requirements. An application for a conditional use permit shall be filed with the planning department in a manner prescribed bV the planning director with the required fee as established by city council resolution. D. Approving authority. The planning commission is the approving authority for conditional use permits, except that the approving authority for all industrial buildings with a gross floor area of 75,000 square feet or greater is the city council. The planning commission may approve, conditionally approve, or deny a conditional use permit application. In instances when an application for a conditional use permit is processed concurrently with other land use entitlements requiring action by the city council, the planning commission shall make a recommendation on the conditional use permit application to the city council. F. Findings.The planning commission and city council shall make the following findings before approving a conditional use permit application: 1. The proposed use is consistent with the general plan and any applicable specific plan, 2. The proposed use is consistent with the purposes of the development code and the purposes of the applicable zoning district as well as any applicable specific plans or city regulations/standards. 3. The site is physically suitable for the type, density, and intensity of the use being proposed, including access, utilities, and the absence of physical constraints that would make conduct of the use undesirable. 4. The design, location, size and operating characteristics of the proposed use would be compatible with the existing and other permitted uses in the vicinity including transportation and service facilities. 5. Granting the permit would not constitute a nuisance or be incurious to detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, or materially incurious to persons, property, or improvements in the vicinity and zoning district in which the property is located. The factors to be considered in making this finding include: a. Property damage or nuisance arising from noise, smoke, odor, dust, vibration or illumination caused bV the use; 12 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 b. Hazard to persons or property from possible explosion, contamination, fire or flood caused by the use; and, c. Significantly increase fothe volume of traffic or negatively alter the pattern of traffic. 6. The proposed use will not pose an undue burden on city services, including police, fire, streets, and other public utilities, such that the city is unable to maintain its current level of service due to the use; and 7. Based on the conclusions of a fiscal/economic impact study, including an employment analysis and a fiscal impact analysis, the proposed use is consistent with the city's economic development strategic plan and will not create a fiscal hardship to the city. 8. The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA). G. Conditions of approval. The approving authority may impose reasonable conditions of approval to enable it to make the above findings and to ensure that the use will meet all applicable performance criteria, regulations, and standards and is compatible with surrounding uses, and to preserve the public health, safety, and welfare. H. Approval applies to land. Any conditional use permit approval shall run with the land and shall continue to be valid for the time period specified, whether or not there is a change of ownership of the site or structure to which it applies. Conditional use permit approval cannot be transferred to another site. 13 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 CITY COUNCIL DECISIONS Sections: 17.22.010 Purpose. 17.22.020 Master plan. 17.22.030 Specific plan and planned community. 17.22.040 Development Code/zoning map amendment. 17.22.050 Prezoning. 17.22.060 Development agreement. 17.22.070 General plan amendment. 17.22.020 Master plan. A. Purpose. The purpose of a master plan is to allow for the coordinated comprehensive planning of a subarea of the city in order to accomplish any of the following objectives: 1. Protect a unique environmental, historical, architectural, or other significant site feature that cannot be adequately protected by adoption of another land use zone. 2. Allow the development of an exceptional project design that cannot be built under an existing zoning district or due to constraints of existing development standards. 3. Further the implementation of specific goals and policies of the city as provided in the general plan. 4. "Plan ahead"and look beyond the limits of a particular property to solve circulation,drainage, and neighborhood compatibility problems. 5. Provide flexibility for developments beyond conventional zoning regulations to address special or unique needs or characteristics. B. Review process. 1. A master plan may be initiated by motion of the planning commission or the city council, by application of property owner(s) of parcel(s) to be affected by the master plan, or by recommendation of the planning director for any reason beneficial to the city. 2. The designated approving authority for a master plan is the city council, which shall hold a public hearing on the planning commission recommendation prior to taking action. The planning commission shall hold a public hearing and then shall provide a recommendation, which recommendation shall include the reasons for the recommendation and the relationship of the proposal to the general plan. The city council approves or denies the master plan by resolution in accordance with the requirements of this title. C. Master plan requirements. 1. A master plan shall include all of the following components: i. Physical characteristics of the site. ii. Location of structures and other significant improvements. iii. Significant natural features of the site. iv. Available public facilities. V. Capacity of existing and planned circulation systems. vi. Existing and planned uses within 1,000 feet. vii. Land within 1,000 feet of the site that is designated as state responsibility area (SRA) or wildland-urban interface fire area. PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 viii. A boundary map of the property and a calculation of the gross land area within the proposed district. A tentative subdivision map may be substituted if the applicant proposes to subdivide the property. ix. A discussion of specific objectives and limits for development of the property which recognize and respond to identified opportunities and constraints of the master plan. x. Proposed land use and a description of how the land uses implement the general plan. A. Proposed density ranges for proposal that include housing and how the density ranges correspond to the general plan. xii. Land use plan including, but not limited to, the acreage of each land use type and number of housing units by type. The distribution of land uses shall be expressed in terms of acreage and the total number of residential units and/or square footage of nonresidential buildings allowed. xiii. A circulation plan showing existing and proposed public and private streets, pedestrian ways, trails, and related transportation access or circulation features required to serve the proposed development. 2. The master plan may include a procedure for review of proposed development, such as: i. Performance and development standard requirements related to setbacks, lot area, intensity of development on each lot, parking requirements, landscaping, and signs. ii. Design standards and guidelines as appropriate for the specific site and development. iii. Open space plan including protection measures for significant natural features, parks, and other site amenities. iv. A site specific wildfire protection plan. v. Types of projects that require review. vi. Documents required from developers. vii. Regulations relating to nonconforming lots, uses, structures, and signs. viii. Time phasing and sequence of development projects. 3. Pursuant to section 17.14.060 and other provisions of this title, a master plan is required for large industrial buildings of 450,000 square feet or more. i. The purpose of the master plan for such industrial buildings is to ensure that the development does not impose significant burdens on City services and nearby businesses and residents, as well as to ensure that the development has adequate public services and infrastructure to accommodate the expected uses. In addition, the master planning process is expected to ensure that the proposed industrial development provides community benefits that may not otherwise be provided through strict application of the provisions of this title. ii. Upon recommendation by the city engineer and fire marshal, a master plan may vary or waive the traffic standards identified in section 17.36.040 if the city council determines that doing so would not frustrate the underlying purpose of the subject standard(s) or cause a significant impact on public health, safety, or welfare. D. Findings. A master plan shall not be adopted unless the following findings are made: 1. The proposed master plan is consistent with the goals, policies, and objectives of the general plan. 2. The proposed master plan meets the requirements set forth in this title. PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 ARTICLE III. ZONING DISTRICTS, ALLOWED USES,AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Chapter 17.26 ESTABLISHMENT OF ZONING DISTRICTS Sections: 17.26.010 Chapter Purpose. 17.26.020 Zoning districts established. 17.26.020 Zoning districts established. A. Zoning district purpose. Zoning districts are established in order to classify, regulate, designate, and distribute the uses of land and buildings; to regulate and restrict the height, setbacks and bulk of buildings; to regulate the area of yards and other open spaces around buildings; and to regulate the density of population. The city is divided into zoning districts that are grouped into two categories: (a) base zoning districts and (b) overlay zoning districts. These districts are listed and described in Table 17.26.020-1 (Rancho Cucamonga Zoning Districts), along with the general plan land use designation that they implement. B. Base zoning districts. The base zoning district is the primary zoning district that applies to a property. Every parcel throughout the city has a base zoning district that establishes the primary land use type, density, intensity, and site development regulations. Base districts are grouped into six categories as follows: 1. Residential Zoning Districts. 2. Mixed Use Zoning Districts. 3. Commercial and Office Zoning Districts. 4. Industrial Zoning Districts. 5. Open Space Zoning Districts. 6. Special Purpose Zoning Districts. C. Overlay zoning districts. The Overlay Zoning Districts supplement base zoning districts for one or more of the following purposes: 1. To allow more flexibility from the standard provisions of the underlying base zone. 2. To protect unique site features or implement location-specific regulations. 3. To specify a particular standard or guideline for an area. D. In the event of a conflict between the regulations of the base zoning district and the Overlay Zoning District, the provisions of the Overlay Zoning District shall apply. 1 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 TABLE 17.26.020-1 RANCHO CUCAMONGA ZONING DISTRICTS Zoning District Zoning District Name/Description Symbol Residential Zoning Districts Very Low Residential. Designates areas for very low density residential use, with a minimum VL lot size of 20,000 square feet and a maximum residential density of up to 2 units per gross acre. L Low Residential. Designates areas for single-family residential use, with a minimum lot size of 7,200 square feet and a maximum residential density of 4 units per gross acre. Low Medium Residential. Designates areas for low medium density single-family or multiple- LM family use with site development regulations that assure development compatible with nearby single-family detached neighborhoods. Residential densities range from 4 to 8 units per gross acre maximum. Medium Residential. Designates areas for medium density multiple-family use, with site M development regulations that assure development compatible with nearby lower density residential development. Residential densities range from 8 to 14 units per gross acre maximum. Medium High Residential. Designates areas for medium high density multiple-family use, MH with site development regulations that assure development compatible with nearby lower density residential development. Residential densities range from 14 to 24 units per gross acre maximum. High Residential. Designates areas for high density multiple-family use, with site H development regulations that assure development compatible with nearby lower density residential development. Residential densities range from 24 to 30 units per gross acre. Mixed Use Zoning District Mixed Use. Designates areas for a mix of residential and nonresidential uses, with site MU development regulations that assure development compatible with nearby lower density residential development, as well as internal compatibility among the varying uses. Commercial and Office Zoning Districts Office/Professional. Designates areas primarily for the development of OP Professional/administrative offices and personal services rather than commodities. Site development regulations and performance standards are designed to make such uses relatively compatible with residential uses. Neighborhood Commercial. Designates areas for immediate day-to-day convenience NC shopping and services for the residents of the immediate neighborhood. Site development regulations and performance standards are intended to make such uses compatible to and harmonious with the character of surrounding residential or less intense land use area. General Commercial. Designates areas for general commercial activities and services of a more intensive nature, including but not limited to major shopping facilities, major service- GC oriented uses, major financial, and corporate headquarters that are designed to serve the city or the region as a whole and are typically located primarily along major transportation routes. 2 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 Zoning District Zoning District Name/Description Symbol CC Community Commercial. Designates areas for commercial activities and services on a larger scale. Businesses are typically auto oriented and located along major commercial corridors. Specialty Commercial. Designates areas designed to enhance the character around historic resources or sites which promote a special landmark quality or create a special ambience. Examples include specialty theme-oriented uses located adjacent to the Thomas Brothers SC Winery, which complement the existing winery structure and provide a unifying theme or the establishment of tourist-oriented specialty uses in other areas, which cater to visitors. A limited number of office uses have been included into the specialty commercial category in order to facilitate an interactive office/commercial environment. Regional Related Commercial. Designates areas for large-scale commercial development RRC that serves both local and regional needs. Sites are easily accessible from freeways and may contain a variety of goods and services, such as large-format retail, department stores, eating and drinking establishments, hotels, and motels. Commercial Office. Designates areas for activities that cater to business support and CO personal services. Uses typically include medical and health care clinics, travel agencies, insurance agencies, copy centers, and other similar land uses. Industrial Zoning Districts Industrial Park. Designates areas for industrial firms seeking an attractive and pleasant working environment and a location which has prestige value. The district allows light IP industrial uses, office and administration facilities, research and development laboratories, and limited types of warehousing, as well as support businesses and commercial service uses. Neo-Industrial. Designates areas to support a complementary mix of uses such as, research and development, light and custom manufacturing, engineering and design services, breweries, and maker spaces, as well as accessory office, retail and limited residential uses to compliment the primary use; supportive amenities and services; and convenient transit access. This zoning district encourages light industrial activities with low environmental impacts and supports the growth of creative industries, incubator businesses, and innovative design and manufacturing. The zoning district is not intended for conventional industrial business such as warehousing, distribution/fulfillment centers, and NI G4 heavy manufacturing.f r a hybrod ipriYctrial ZGRe that serves of uses inGI61 dmRq but Ret Y, oted tG FGSeaFGh and deVeIGPMeR+ light anal G MGM m pL JfaGt tripq o breweries, Rd maker spaGeS. AGGeScE,r"Gf mGe ro+oil and r cideRtial uses GOMIDIGMeRtary mix of lew impaGt oRd uctrial uses .,i+h suigigc prove amenities and! s.c D86igRates areas for the widest possible raRge of light and mediurn iRdystrial aGtmv*l 0 ncluding manufacturing, assembling, fabrication, wholesaling, heavy commercial, and office uses. The district may be employed as a buffer between nonindustrial uses and heavy inrl ctrial u coc Minimum Import/Hemp, Inrdu ctriallndustrial Employment. Designates areas reserved for heavier manufacturing, processing, construction and heavy equipment yards, warehousing and storage, e-commerce distribution, light industrial research parks, automobile and vehicle IE Ml� services, and a broad range of similar clean industrial practices and processes that t ply generate more truck traffic, noise, and environmental impacts than would be compatible with office and residential uses.oRdus+rial uses of all t„pas in,.'ud'Rg mr,r,,,faGtUrin .,aroh oipr. @Rd StEF@Qe, IGQOStGS GGRteFS, and or"eo4eaR 'Rd6istriak4 ej. This zoning district prohibits 3 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 Zoning District Zoning District Name/Description Symbol non-industrial uses, except for accessory office and commercial uses (such as restaurants or convenience stores)that support the emploVees of the primary industrial use, and on-site caretaker units. Designates areas for heavy industrial uses that Will not SigRifiGaRtly impact the S61rroyRdiRg area including but not limited to, manufacturing, compounding, processing, fabrwcatbp,, wa,"-eheLlSiRg, storage, and freight hay-„-JIiRg fabrication,Heavy industrial. Designates areas for heavy industrial uses including manufactu i 1=4 compounding, processing, warehousing, storage, and freight handling. Use GhaFaGteriStOGS of this group ORGILIde large StFLIGtLiFeS to facilitate PFOGeSSORg and Gpe- I storage of large amounts of raw or semi refined product—s. Open Space Zoning Districts Open Space. Designates areas primarily to protect environmentally sensitive land. The use OS regulations, development standards, and criteria provide low intensity development and encourage recreational activities and preservation of natural resources. Hillside Residential. Designates areas for maintaining natural open space character through protection of natural landforms; minimizing erosion; providing for public safety; protecting HR water, flora, and fauna resources; and establishing design standards to provide for limited development in harmony with the environment. Allowed density is a maximum of 2 units per net buildable acre as determined through the Hillside Development Review process. FC Flood Control. Designates areas necessary for flood control facilities for protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. UC Utility Corridor. Designates areas within utility corridors in which land uses compatible to both the utility function and surrounding, existing, or proposed land uses are allowed. Special Purpose Zoning Districts Specific Plan. Designates areas for master planning through the adoption of a specific plan SP with unique land use and development standards for a particular project areas with a minimum of 300 acres. Planned Community. Designates areas master planning through the adoption of a Planned PC Community, which can establish unique land use and development standards for a particular project area. Planned Communities typically include less detail than specific plans and have no minimum project size requirement. Overlay Zoning Districts Senior Housing. Designates areas available for affordable rental housing units to serve the SH city's senior citizens. District provisions ensure high quality project design and establish incentives for ongoing affordability for this target group. This district can be combined with any residential base zoning district that meets the overlay district qualifications. Equestrian. Designates areas for the keeping of equine, bovine, and cleft-hoofed animals. E Further, this district protects the ability to maintain such animals, promotes a "rural/farm" character in an urban setting, and recognizes and encourages the educational and recreational values derived from raising and maintaining such animals. This district may be 4 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 Zoning District Zoning District Name/Description Symbol combined with any residential base zoning district that meets the overlay district qualifications. Foothill Boulevard. Designates areas along Foothill Boulevard for special use and development regulations to implement the goals and objectives in the general plan for this FB important corridor that covers most of the length of Historic Route 66 through the city. Special regulations encourage a mix of uses, concentrate neighborhood, community, and regional-serving uses as appropriate, and accommodate future transit. Hillside. Designates sloped areas subject to special hillside development regulations. H Generally, this district applies to areas with a slope greater than or equal to 8%. This district may be combined with any residential base zoning district that meets the overlay district qualifications. HA Haven Avenue. Designates an area along Haven Avenue with unique allowed use regulations and development standards focused on high quality office opportunities. Industrial Commercial. Designates areas with an Industrial Park Base Zoning District to IC encourage and support the integration of traditional general commercial uses and special development review requirements focused on retail opportunities. LW Large Warehouse. Designates areas with a gross floors ace over 450,000 square feet 5 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 ARTICLE III. SITE DEVELOPMENT PROVISIONS Chapter 17.30 ALLOWED USE BY BASE ZONING DISTRICT Sections: 17.30.010 Purpose. 17.30.020 Classification of land uses. 17.30.030 Allowed land uses and permit requirements. 17.30.040 Other allowed use provisions 17.30.030 Allowed land uses and permit requirements. A. Allowed land uses. Allowed uses and corresponding permit and entitlement requirements for the base zoning districts are listed in Table 17.30.030-1 (Allowed Land Uses and Permit Requirements by Base Zoning District). Uses are organized into common categories as follows: 1. Residential uses. 2. Agriculture and animal related uses. 3. Recreation, resource preservation, open space, education, and public assembly uses. 4. Utility, transportation, public facility, and communication uses. 5. Retail, service, and office uses. 6. Automobile and vehicle uses. 7. Industrial, manufacturing, and processing uses. B. Permit requirements. Generally, a use is either allowed by right, allowed through issuance of a conditional use permit, or not permitted. In addition to the requirements for planning permits or entitlements listed herein, other permits and entitlements may be required prior to establishment of the use (e.g., building permit or permits required by other agencies). The requirements for planning permits or entitlements identified in Table 17.30.030-1 (Allowed Land Uses and Permit Requirements by Base Zoning District) include: 1. Permitted(P). A land use shown with a "P" indicates that the land use is permitted by right in the designated zoning district, subject to compliance with all applicable provisions of this title (e.g., development standards)as well state and federal law. 2. Permitted with a Minor Use Permit(M). A land use shown with an "M" indicates that the land use is permitted in the designated zoning district upon issuance of a minor use permit from the designated approving authority, subject to compliance with all applicable provisions of this zoning code (e.g., development standards)as well as state and federal law. 3. Conditionally permitted(C). A land use shown with a "C" indicates that the land use is permitted in the designated zoning district upon issuance of a conditional use permit from the 1 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 designated approving authority, subject to compliance with all applicable provisions of this zoning code (e.g., development standards)as well as state and federal law. 4. Not permitted(N). A land use shown with an "N" is not allowed in the applicable zoning district. Additionally, uses not shown in the table are not permitted, except as otherwise provided for in this title. 5. Adult entertainment permit(A). A land use shown with an "A" indicates that the land use is permitted in the designated zoning district upon issuance of an adult entertainment permit from the designated approving authority, subject to compliance with all applicable provisions of this zoning code (e.g., development operational standards) as well as state and federal law. C. Base zoning district names and symbols. Base zoning district names for the zoning district symbols used in the table are listed below. Specific Plan (SP) District and Planned Community (PC) District are not listed in the table as the allowed uses for those base zoning districts are determined in compliance with the adopted Specific Plan or Planned Community. •Very Low Residential (VL) • Specialty Commercial (SC) • Low Residential (L) • Regional Related Commercial (RRC) • Low Medium Residential (LM) • Commercial Office (CO) • Medium Residential (M) • Industrial Park (IP) • Medium High Residential (MH) • Neo-Industrial (NI) (_oaornl Ind striae (GI) • Industrial Employment (IE) "gin • High Residential (H) I,,,,,aGVHeayy I.dustrial (MUH ) • Mixed Use (MU) • Open Space (OS) ueay Rdustl4a. " • Office Professional (OP) • Hillside Residential District (HR)QPen-Space PS-) • Neighborhood Commercial (NC) • Flood Control-Open Space (FC) Hillside Resin Rtial DiotriGt (HRA • General Commercial (GC) • Utility Corridor-Open Space (UC) Flood Control • Community Commercial (CC) TABLE 17.30.030-1: ALLOWED LAND USES AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS BY BASE ZONING DISTRICT Land Use/Zoning VL L LM M MH H MU OP NC GC CC Sc RRC CO IP GINI MI"IE OS HR FC UC District — — Residential Uses Adult Day Care Home P P P P P P P N N N N N N N N N N N P N N Caretaker Housing CM CM CM CM CM CM CM P P P N N N N CM CM CM P CM P P Dwelling,Multi-Family N N P P P P P N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Dwelling,Single-Family P P P P N N N N N N N N N N N N N P P N N Dwelling,Two-Family N N P P P P P N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Emergency Shelter N N N N N N N N N P N N N N N CN NN N N N N Family Day Care Home, CM CM CM GM CM CM CM N N N N N N N N N N N CM N N Large t��1 — — 2 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 Land Use/Zoning VL L LM M MH H MU OP NC GC CC SC RRC CO IP GINI MIIHIIE OS HR FC UC District — Family Day Care Home, P P P P P P P N N N N N N N N N N N P N N Small Guest House P P P N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Group Residential GM GM GM GM GM GM GM GM GM GM GM N GM N N N N N GM N N Home Occupation(2) P P P P P P P N N N N N N N N N N P P N N Live-Work Facility N N N N N N P N N N N N N N N NC NC N N N N Manufactured Home(3) P P P P N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P N N Mobile Home Park(3) GM GM GM GM GM GM N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Residential Care Facility N GM GM GM GM IGIN N N N N N N N N N N N N N Residential Care Home P P P P P N N N N N N N N N N P N N Short-Term Rental(16) P P P P P P N N P P P P N P P P P P Single-Room N N N P P N N N N N N N N N N N N N Occupancy FacilityTransitional Housing P P P P P N N N N N N N N N N P N N Agriculture and Animal-Related Uses Agricultural Uses N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P N P P Animal Keeping, P P P P P P P N N N N N N N N N N N P N N Domestic Pets(') Animal Keeping,Exotic GM GM GM GM GM GM GM N N N N N N N N N N N GM N N Animals(4) — — — — — — — — Animal Keeping,Insects(a) P N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Animal Keeping, P P N N N N N N N N N N N N GM N N N N N N Livestock Animals(a) Animal Keeping,Poultry(a) P N N N N N N N N N N N N N GM N N N N N N Equestrian Facility, GM N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N GM N GM CM Commercial — — — Equestrian Facility, P N N N N N N N N N JN Hobby N N N N N N N NLand Use/Zoning VL L LM M MH H MU OP NC GC RRC CO IP GINI MI/HIIE OS HR FC UC District — — Recreation,Resource Preservation,Open Space,Education,and Public Assembly Uses Assembly Use GM GM GM GM GM GM CM GM GM GM GM GM GM GM GM C N N N N N Cemetery/Mausoleum N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N GM N N N Community Center/Civic GM GM CM CM GM GM CM CM GM GM CM GM GM N P P N N GM N N Use Community Garden GM GM CM CM GM GM N N N N N N N N N N N P N P P Convention Center N N N N N N GM CM GM GM CM CM GM CM CM C C N N N N Golf Course/Clubhouse N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N GM N GM GM Indoor Amusement/ N N N N N N GM N GM GM P P P N GM C N N N N N Entertainment Facility — — — Indoor Fitness and N N N N N N CM CM GM GM CM CM GM CM CM C N N N N N Sports Facility—Large Indoor Fitness and N N N N N N P P P P P GM P P CM C N N N N N Sports Facility—Small Library and Museum GM GM GM GM GM GM P P P P N P N P GM N N GM GM GM GM 3 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 Outdoor Commercial N N N N N N CM CM GM CM N N CM GM GM C N N N N N Recreation Park and Public Plaza P P P P P P P N N N N N N N NM NM NM P P P P Public Safety Facility SM SM CM CM GM CM CM CM GM CM GM GM CM GM GM C C N CM N N Resource-Related P P P P P P P N N N N N N N N N N P P P P Recreation School,Academic GM GM CM CM CM CM CM CM GM CM GM GM CM GM GM C N N CM N N (Private) School,Academic P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P N N P N N (Public) School, College/University GM GM CM CM GM CM CM CM GM CM GM GM CM GM GM C N N CM N N (Private) School, College/University GM GM GM GM GM GM GM GM GM GM GM GM CM CM CM C N N C N N (Public) Schools,Specialized Education and N N N N N N CM CM 6M CM 6M SM CM CM C C CN N N N N Training/Studio Theaters and N N N N N N CM N N CM N N P N N N N N N N N Auditoriums Tutoring Center—Large N N N N N N CM CM GM CM GM CM CM CM N N N N N N N Tutoring Center—Small N N N N N N P P P P P P P P N N N N N N N Utility,Transportation,Public Facility,and Communication Uses Broadcasting and N N N N N N N P N P N N N P P P N N N N N Recording Studios Park and Ride Facility N N N N N N N CM CM CM N N N N PC P NC N N N N Parking Facility N N N N N N NP NP N NP CN N CN NP CN CN NC N N CN CN Transit Facility N N N N N N N N N N N N N N CM C C N N N N Utility Facility and Infrastructure—Fixed N N N N N N N N N N N N N N CM C C C N CM GM Based Structures 5> Utility Facility and Infrastructure— P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P Pipelines(1) Wind Energy System— P N N N N N N N N N N N N N NP PN CP N N N N Small(11) Land Use/Zoning VL L LM M MH H MU OP NC GC CC SC RRC CO IP GINI INIIHIIE OS HR FC UC District — — Retail,Service,and Office Uses Adult Day Care Facility N N N N N N CM CM CM CM N N N CM C C N N N N N Adult-Oriented Business(s) N N N N N N N N N N N N N N A A A N N N N Alcoholic Beverage N N N N N N CM N CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM N N N N N Sales Ambulance Service N N N N N N N CM GM CM N N N N N C P N N N N Animal Sales and N N N N N N P N P P P P N N N N N N N N N Grooming Art,Antique,Collectable N N N N N N P N P P P P P N N N N N N N N Shop(") Artisan Shop(") N N N N N N P N P P P P P N N N N N N N N Bail Bonds N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Banks and Financial N N N N N N CM CM GM P P P P P P P N N N N N Services 4 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 Bar/Nightclub N N N N N N GM GM N CM GM GM GM GM N C N N N N N Bed and Breakfast Inn GM GM CM N N N N N N N GM GM N N N N N N N N N Building Materials Store N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N CM P N N N N and Yard Business Support N N N N N N P P P P P P P P P P NP N N N N Services Call Center N N N N N N N N N N I N N N N GM GM NC N N N N Card Room N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Check Cashing Business(7) N N N N N N P N P P N N N N P N N N N N N Child Day Care N N N N N N GM GM GM GM GM N CM CM CM PC PN N N N N Facility/Center Commercial Cannabis N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Activity Consignment Store N N N N N N CM N GM GM N GM N N N N N N N N N Convenience Store N N N N N N P N P P N GM N N GM CM N N N N N Crematory Services(7) N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N CM N N N N N Drive-In and Drive- Through Sales and N N N N N N GM GM GM GM CM N GM GM GM GM N N N N N Service(1) Land Use/Zoning VL L LM M MH H MU OP NC GC CC SC RRC CO IP GINI WHIIE OS HR FC UC District Equipment Sales and N N N N N N N N N CM N N N N N C P N N N N Rental Feed and Tack Store N N N N N N N N P P N N N N N N N N N N N Furniture,Furnishing, N N N N N N P N P P P P P N N N N N N N N and Appliance Store Garden Center/Plant N N N N N N P N P P P N P N N P NP P N P P Nursery Grocery N N N N N N P N P P P N P N N N N N N N N Store/Supermarket Gun Sales N N N N N N N N N CM N N N N NM NM N N N N N Hookah Shop N N N N N N GM N N GM N N N N N N N N N N N Home Improvement N N N N N N P N P P P N P N GM P NP N N N N Supply Store Hotel N j N j N N N N GM GM N GM N N GM GM GM N N N N N N Internet Cafe N N N N N N P P P P P P P P P NP PIN N N N N Kennel,Commercial N N N N N N N N N GM GM N GM N GM C N N N N N Liquor Store N N N N N N CM N GM GM GM GM GM N GM GM N N N N N Maintenance and Repair,Small N N N N N N P N P P P N P P NP P P N N N N Equipment Massage Establishment N N N N N N P P P P P P P P N N N N N N N Massage Establishment,Ancillary N N N N N N P P P P P P P P P P N N N N N pia) Medical Services, N GM GM GM GM GM GM P N P P N N P P P N N N N N Extended Care Medical Services, N N N N N N P P P P P P P P P P N N N N N General Medical Services, N N CM Hospitals GM GM GM GM GM N GM N N N N P P N N N N N - 5 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 Land Use/Zoning VL L LM M MH H MU OP NC GC CC SC RRC CO IP GINI MIIHIIE OS HR FC UC District — — Mobile Hot Food Truck N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N NP PN N N N N Mortuary/Funeral Home N N N N N N N GM GM GM N N N N N N N N N N N Office,Business and N N N N N N P P P P P P P P P P N N N N N Professional Office,Accessory N N N N N N P P P P P P P P P P NP N N N N Pawnshop(') N N N N N N N N N GM N N N N N N N N N N N Personal Services N N N N N N P P P P P P P P P P NP N N N N Restaurant,No Liquor N N N N N N P P P P P P P P P P NP N N N N Service — Restaurant,Beer and N N N N N N P P P P P P P P P P NC N N N N Wine Restaurant,Full Liquor N N N N N N GM GM GM GM GM GM GM GM GM GM N N N N N Service Retail,Accessory N N N N N N P P P P P N P P GM GM NP N N N N Retail,General N N N N N N P N P P P P P N GM GM NC N N N N Retail,Warehouse Club N N N N N N P N N P P N P N P N N N N N N Secondhand Dealer N N N N N N P N P P N N N N N N N N N N N Shooting Range N N N N N N N N N N N N N N NM C N N VNN N Smoke Shop(') N N N N N N N N N GM GM N GM N N N N NN Specialty Food Store(11) N N N N N N P N P P P P P N N N N NN Tattoo Shop(') N N N N N N N N N SM N N N N N N N NN Thrift Store(7) N N N N N N GM N GM SM 6M N SM N N N N NN Veterinary Facility GM N N N N N SM N P P GM GM --_M N N P P NN Automobile and Vehicle Uses A-t n hor N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Dismaling Auto and Vehicle Sales N N N N N N N GM N GM N N P N GM GM N N N N N and Rental Auto and Vehicle Sales, N N N N N N N P P P P N P P P N N N N N N Autobroker Auto and Vehicle Sales, N N N N N N N P P P P N P P P P N N N N N Wholesale Auto and Vehicle N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N GN C_N N N N N Storage Auto Parts Sales N N N N N N N N P P N N P N N N N N N N N Car Washing and N N N N N N N N N GM GM N GM N GM N N N N N N Detailing Parking Facility N N N N N N P P N P C N C P N N N N N C C Recreational Vehicle N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C C N N N N Storage Service Stations N N N N N N GM GM GM P GM N GM GM GM GM N N N N N Vehicle Services,Major N N N N N N N N N GM N N N N N P P N N N N Vehicle Services,Minor N N N N N N N GM GM P N N GM N P P N N N N N Land Use/Zoning VL L LM M MH H MU OP NC GC CC SC RRC CO IP AINI 101411E OS HR FC UC District — — Industrial,Manufacturing,and Processing Uses(17) Commercial (Secondary/Accessory) N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P P NP N N N N -Industrial 6 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 Commercial (Repurposing)- N N N N N N N N N N N N N N CM C C N N N N Industrial E-Commerce Distribution Distribution/ N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C N N N N Fulfillment Center — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Parcel Sorting N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C C N N N N Facilities — — — — — — — — — — — — — N N N N N N Parcel Hub Small N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M M N N N N (<130,000 so.ft.) — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Parcel Hub Large N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C N N N N (>130,000 sq.ft.) Fuel Storage aF4 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C C N N N N Dostrib-inn Lumber Yard N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C N N N N Maker Space/Accessory N N N N N M N N N N N N N N M P P N N N N Maker Space Manufacturing,Custom N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P P N N N N N Manufacturing,Green N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P P N N N N Technology — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — enaRufaGtu.i„e Heavy N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Rq,Heavy n �...,,aGturi....,,.« N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P N N N N Manufacturing,Lighter N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P C NM N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P P P N N N N Microbrewery N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P P NP N N N N Printing and Publishing N N N N N N N N N P N N N N P P N N N N N Recycling Facility, N N N N N N N N P P N N N N N PC PC N N N N Collection — — Recycling Facility, N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C C N N N N Processing ReGyGldRg FaGillty T�1�^3T�'^`T� N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N €asiiity Research and N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P P NP N N N N Development Storage,Personal N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C C N N N N Storage Facility Storage Warehouse N N N N N N N N N CM N N N N N C C N N N N Storage Yard N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C PC N N N N 1nn,elesale Ste..,ee N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C P N N N N Wholesale,Storage, and Distribution- N N N N N N N N N N N N N N PM PC P N N N N Light Wholesale,Storage, and Distribution- N N N N N N N N N N N N N N PM PC P N N N N Medium(12) Work/Live N N N N N N N N N N N N N N PM PM PM N N N N Table Notes: (1) Reserved. (2) See additional regulations for home occupations in Chapter 17.92. (3) See additional regulations for mobile homes in Chapter 17.96. (4) See additional regulations for animal keeping in Chapter 17.88. 7 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 (5) Utility facilities and infrastructure involving hazardous or volatile gas and/or liquid pipeline development require approval of a Conditional Use Permit. (6) See additional regulations for adult entertainment businesses in Chapter 17.86.Adult-oriented businesses are not permitted west of Haven Avenue. (7) See additional regulations for special regulated uses in Chapter 17.102. (8) See additional regulations for drive-in and drive-through facilities in Chapter 17.90. (9) Not permitted within 300 feet of residentially zoned property. (10) See additional regulations for wind energy systems in Chapter 17.76. (11) Family Day Care Home—Large requires approval of a Large Family Day Care Permit,not a Conditional Use Permit. (12) "Wholesale,SteFage and DistFibut on Medium"'snNot permitted on any parcel that is located within,or partly within,five hundred(500)feet of the Foothill Boulevard right-of-way. (13) Permitted in Industrial Park and General Industrial zoning districts when proposed in conjunction with"Commercial(Repurposing)—Industrial'. (14) Massage establishment permit required.See additional regulations for massage establishments in chapter 5.18. (16) A short-term rental must be a single family residence in zoning districts other than VL,L,and LM.See additional regulations for short-term rentals in Chapter 8.34. (17)Maximum building gross floor area for all industrial uses is 450,000 square feet.A master plan is required for all industrial buildings larger than 450,000 square feet in gross floor area.See footnote 1 in Table 17.14.060-1 (Approving Authority for Land Use Entitlements). 8 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 ARTICLE III. ZONING DISTRICTS, ALLOWED USES, AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Chapter 17.32 ALLOWED USE DESCRIPTIONS Sections: 17.32.010 Purpose. 17.32.020 Allowed use descriptions. 17.32.030 Agricultural uses permitted or conditionally permitted. 17.32.020 Allowed use descriptions. The following list represents the complete list of allowed uses by land use classification and corresponding descriptions as used in Table 17.30.030-1 (Allowed Land Uses and Permit Requirements by Base Zoning District)and throughout this title. For the purpose of this chapter, it is assumed that the use is the most intensive for traffic and CEQA purposes. Individual use classifications describe one or more uses having similar characteristics, but do not list every use or activity that may appropriately be within the classification. Allowed uses are organized into the following seven use categories as follows: • Residential uses. • Agriculture and animal-related uses. • Recreation, resource preservation, open space, education, and public assembly uses. • Utility, transportation, public facility, and communication uses. • Retail, service, and office uses. • Automobile and vehicle uses. • Industrial, manufacturing, and processing uses. A. Residential uses. 1. Adult day care home. Defined by state law as the provision of nonmedical care to six or fewer adults, including seniors, in the provider's own home,for a period of less than 24 hours at a time. Homes serving more than six adults are included in adult day care facility. 2. Caretaker housing. A residence that is accessory to a site with a nonresidential primary use and that is needed for security, 24-hour care or supervision, or monitoring of facilities, equipment, or other conditions on the site. 3. Dwelling, multi-family. A building designed and intended for occupancy by three or more households living independently of each other, each in a separate dwelling unit, which may be owned individually or by a single landlord (e.g., apartment, apartment house, townhouse, condominium). 4. Dwelling, single-family. A building designed exclusively for occupancy by one household on a single lot. This classification includes manufactured homes (defined in California Health and Safety Code§18007) and model homes for the first sale of homes within the subdivision. 5. Dwelling, two-family. An attached building (e.g., duplex) designed for occupancy by two households living independently of each other, where both dwellings are located on a single lot. For the purposes of this title, this definition also includes halfplexes (two attached units, each with a separate lot). Does not include accessory dwelling units. Pagel PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 6. Emergency shelter.A facility for the temporary shelter and feeding of indigents or disaster victims and operated by a public or nonprofit agency. 7. Family day care home, large. State-licensed facilities that provide nonmedical care and supervision of minor children for periods of less than 24 hours within a single-family or multi- family dwelling.The occupant of the residence provides care and supervision generally for seven to 14 children. As described in the Health and Safety Code, large day care homes may provide services for up to 14 children when specific conditions are met. 8. Family day care home, small. State-licensed facilities that provide nonmedical care and supervision of minor children for periods of less than 24 hours within a single-family or multi- family dwelling. The occupant of the residence provides care and supervision generally to six or fewer children. As described in the California Health and Safety Code, small day care homes for children may provide services for up to eight children when specific conditions are met. 9. Group residential. Shared living quarters without separate kitchen and/or bathroom facilities for each room or unit. This classification includes residential hotels, dormitories, fraternities, sororities, convents, rectories, and private residential clubs but does not include living quarters shared exclusively by a family. This category includes boardinghouses, which are defined as a building other than a hotel or restaurant where meals or lodging or both meals and lodging are provided for compensation for four or more persons. 10. Guest house. A detached structure accessory to a single-family dwelling, accommodating living and/or sleeping quarters, but without kitchen or cooking facilities. 11. Home occupation. The conduct of a business within a dwelling unit or residential site, employing occupants of the dwelling, with the business activity being subordinate to the residential use of the property. Examples include, but are not limited to, accountants and financial advisors, architects, artists, attorneys, offices for construction businesses (no equipment or material storage), and real estate sales. This category includes cottage food uses, consistent with state law. 12. Live-work facility. A structure or portion of a structure: a. That combines a commercial or manufacturing activity allowed in the zone with a residential living space for the owner of the commercial or manufacturing business, or the owner's employee, and that person's household; b. Where the resident owner or employee of the business is responsible for the commercial or manufacturing activity performed; C. Where the commercial or manufacturing activity conducted takes place subject to a valid business license associated with the premises; and d. The commercial or manufacturing activity is secondary to the residential living space. 13. Manufactured home. California Health and Safety Code § 18007 defines a manufactured home as a structure, that meets the following criteria: a. Transportable in one or more sections. b. When in the traveling mode, is eight body feet or more in width, or 40 body feet or more in length, or, when erected on-site, is 320 or more square feet. C. Built on a permanent chassis. d. Designed to be used as a residential dwelling. e. Erected with or without a permanent foundation when connected to the required utilities. f. Includes the plumbing, heating, air conditioning, and electrical systems contained therein. g. This term shall include any structure that meets all the requirements of this paragraph except the size requirements so long as the manufacturer voluntarily files a certification and complies with the standards established under this part. Manufactured home includes Page 2 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 a mobile-home subject to the National Manufactured Housing Construction and Safety Act of 1974 (42 USC section 5401 et seq.). 14. Mobile home park. Consistent with definitions of state law (Health and Safety Code section 18214), a mobile home park is any site that is planned and improved to accommodate two or more mobile homes used for residential purposes, or on which two or more mobile home lots are rented, leased, or held out for rent or lease, or were formerly held out for rent or lease and later converted to a subdivision, cooperative, condominium, or other form of resident ownership, to accommodate mobile homes used for residential purposes. 15. Residential care facility. Consistent with the definitions of state law, a residential care facility provides 24-hour nonmedical care for more than six persons 18 years of age or older, or emancipated minors, with chronic, life-threatening illness in need of personal services, protection, supervision, assistance, guidance, or training essential for sustaining the activities of daily living or for the protection of the individual. This classification includes, but is not limited to, rest homes, residential care facilities for the elderly, adult residential facilities, wards of the juvenile court, and other facilities licensed by the State of California. Convalescent homes, nursing homes, and similar facilities providing medical care are included under the definition of medical services, extended care. When located in the low (L) and low-medium (LM) residential districts, a residential care facility shall maintain a minimum three-acre project area. 16. Residential care home. Consistent with the definitions of state law (Health and Safety Code section 1502), a residential care home is a home that provides 24-hour nonmedical care for six or fewer persons 18 years of age or older, or emancipated minors, with chronic, life-threatening illness in need of personal services, protection, supervision, assistance, guidance, or training essential for sustaining the activities of daily living, or for the protection of the individual. This classification includes rest homes, residential care facilities for the elderly, adult residential facilities, wards of the juvenile court, and other facilities licensed by the State of California. Convalescent homes, nursing homes, and similar facilities providing medical care are included under the definition of"medical services, extended care." 17. Short-term rental. A short-term rental is a dwelling unit, or any portion thereof, that is rented by the host to another party for a period of not more than 30 consecutive days in exchange for any form of monetary or non-monetary consideration, including trade, fee, swap or any other consideration in lieu of cash payment. Hosted stays, un-hosted stays, and vacation rentals are types of short-term rental. Related definitions are available in Section 8.34.010. 18. Single-room occupancy (SRO) facility. Multi-unit housing for very low-income persons that typically consists of a single room and shared bath and also may include a shared common kitchen and common activity area. SROs may be restricted to seniors or be available to persons of all ages. Subsidized versions may be supervised by a government housing agency. 19. Transitional housing. Consistent with Health and Safety Code section 50675.2, transitional housing is defined as buildings configured as rental housing developments, but operated under program requirements that call for the termination of assistance and recirculation of the assisted unit to another eligible program recipient at some predetermined future point in time, which shall be no less than six months. B. Agriculture and animal-related uses. 1. Agricultural uses. This use category includes farms, orchards, vineyards, livestock grazing, and hydroponics, including on-site sales of products grown on site. 2. Animal keeping. Care and maintenance of animals on private property. The listing below provides a distinction between various types of animals related to allowed use provisions in Table 17.30.030-1 (Allowed Land Uses and Permit Requirements by Base Zoning District). This classification is distinct from "animal sales and grooming"and "equestrian facility(commercial or hobby)."Also see Kennel, commercial, which provides for the boarding of animals (e.g., doggie day-care). Page 3 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 a. Domestic pets. Small animals (no larger than the largest breed of dogs) customarily kept as pets within a dwelling unit. This classification includes dogs, cats, fish, and birds (excluding large tropical birds and poultry). b. Exotic animals. Wild animals not customarily confined or cultivated by man for domestic or commercial purposes, but kept as a pet or for display, including wolf-dog hybrids, non- poisonous snakes, reptiles, and large tropical birds (including peacocks). C. Insects. Small arthropod animals confined or cultivated by man for domestic purposes including but not limited to flies, crickets, mosquitoes, beetles, butterflies, and bees. d. Livestock animals. Domesticated animals that may be kept or raised in pens, barns, houses, and pastures for private use. Livestock includes, but is not limited to, cattle, sheep, swine, pot belly pigs, goats, and equine. e. Poultry. Domesticated birds (fowl) customarily kept for eggs or meat. This classification includes chickens, roosters, ducks, geese, turkeys, guinea fowl, and Cornish game hens. 3. Equestrian facility, commercial. Commercial horse, donkey, and mule facilities including horse ranches, boarding stables, riding schools and academies, horse exhibition facilities (for shows or other competitive events), pack stations, and barns,stables, corrals, and paddocks accessory and incidental to these uses. 4. Equestrian facility, hobby. Stables, corrals, and paddocks used by the individual homeowners of corresponding property and their animals. C. Recreation, resource preservation, open space, education, and public assembly uses. 1. Assembly use. A permanent meeting facility for organizations operating on a membership basis for the promotion of the interests of the members, including facilities for business associations; civic, social, and fraternal organizations; labor unions and similar organizations; political organizations; religious organizations; professional membership organizations; and other membership organizations. 2. Cemetery/mausoleum. Land used for the burial of the dead and dedicated for cemetery purposes, including columbariums and mausoleums. Also see Mortuary/funeral home and crematory services. 3. Community center/civic use. Multipurpose meeting and recreational facility typically consisting of one or more meeting or multipurpose rooms, kitchen, and/or outdoor barbecue facilities that are available for use by various groups for such activities as meetings, parties, receptions, dances, etc. 4. Community garden. A privately or publicly owned vacant parcel of land used by the community or a neighborhood for the growing of fruits, vegetables, and culinary herbs for personal consumption and/or to be offered for sale on site or at a local certified farmers' market. 5. Convention center.A large building designed to hold a convention,where individuals and groups gather to promote and share common interests. Convention centers typically offer sufficient floor area to accommodate several thousand attendees. Convention centers typically have at least one auditorium and may also contain concert halls, lecture halls, meeting rooms, and conference rooms. Some large resort-area hotels include a convention center. 6. Golf course%lubhouse. A golf course and accessory facilities and uses including clubhouses with bar and restaurant, locker and shower facilities, driving ranges, "pro shops"for on-site sales of golfing equipment, and golf cart storage and sales facilities. 7. Indoor amusement/entertainment facility. An establishment providing amusement and entertainment services in an indoor facility for a fee or admission charge, including, but not limited to, dance halls, ballrooms, bowling alleys, laser tag, inflatable playgrounds, trampoline parks, escape room venues and electronic game arcades, as primary uses. Four or more electronic games or coin-operated amusements in any establishment, or premises where 50% Page 4 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 or more of the floor area is occupied by amusement devices, are considered an amusement device arcade as described above; three or less machines are not considered a land use separate from the primary use of the site. 8. Indoor fitness and sports facility, large. An establishment predominantly for participant sports and health activities conducted entirely within an enclosed building greater than 2,500 square feet. Typical uses include bowling alleys, billiard parlors, ice/roller skating rinks, indoor racquetball courts, indoor climbing facilities, soccer areas, athletic clubs, and health clubs. This use classification also includes studio-style facilities such as dance/ballet,yoga, martial arts,and fitness studios. 9. Indoor fitness and sports facility, small. An establishment predominantly for participant sports and health activities conducted entirely within an enclosed building less than or equal to 2,500 square feet. Typical uses include studio-style facilities such as dance/ballet, yoga, martial arts, and fitness studios but may also include uses described in "indoor fitness and sports facilities, large" if they are in an enclosed building less than or equal to 2,500 square feet. 10. Library and museum. A public or quasi-public facility including aquariums, arboretums, art exhibitions, botanical gardens, historic sites and exhibits, libraries, museums, and planetariums, which are generally noncommercial in nature. 11. Outdoor commercial recreation. Facility for various outdoor participant sports and types of recreation where a fee is charged for use (e.g., amphitheaters, amusement and theme parks, golf driving ranges, health and athletic club with outdoor facilities, miniature golf courses, skateboard parks, stadiums and coliseums, swim and tennis clubs, water slides, zoos). 12. Park and public plaza. A public park including playgrounds and athletic fields/courts and public plazas and outdoor gathering places for community use. If privately owned and restricted to the public (e.g., require payment of fee), the same facilities are included under the definition of "outdoor commercial recreation." 13. Public safety facility. Facility operated by public agencies including fire stations, other fire prevention and firefighting facilities, and police and sheriff substations and headquarters, including interim incarceration facilities. 14. Resource-related recreation. Facility related to passive recreation in open space areas including bicycle and pedestrian trails, picnic areas, parking areas, and interpretive centers. 15. School, academic (private). Any privately owned and operated elementary school, middle school, secondary school, high school, or other institution providing academic instruction for students from kindergarten through 12th grade. This listing also includes a private school operating under a charterfrom the local school district and not managed directly by the governing body of the public school district(e.g., school board). 16. School, academic (public). Public elementary schools, middle schools, secondary schools, high schools, and any other public school providing academic instruction for students from kindergarten through 12th grade. 17. School, college/university(private). Any privately owned college or university, including medical schools, law schools, and other instruction of higher education, including dorms, offices, facility maintenance yards, offices, and similar supportive functions. 18. School, college/university (public). Public community colleges, colleges, and universities, including dorms, offices, facility maintenance yards, offices, and similar supportive functions. 19. School, specialized education and training. Specialty schools for instructing and training students in a variety of specialized programs, including, but not limited to, computers and electronics training, drama, driver educational, language, music. Includes professional, vocational, and trade schools of a nonindustrial nature (e.g., culinary, cosmetology, arts and media, accounting and finance, health and dental including nursing, legal, psychology, and technology). Page 5 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 20. Theater and auditorium. An indoor facility for public assembly and group entertainment, other than sporting events (e.g., civic theaters, facilities for"live" theater and concerts, exhibition and convention halls, motion picture theaters, auditoriums). Does not include outdoor theaters, concert and similar entertainment facilities, and indoor and outdoor facilities for sporting events; see Outdoor commercial recreation. 21. Tutoring center, large.An indoor facility where instructors teach, coach, or educate students with more than ten instructors and/or students using the facility at any given time. 22. Tutoring center, small. An indoor facility where instructors teach, coach, or educate students with ten or fewer instructors and/or students using the facility at any given time. D. Utility, transportation, public facility, and communication uses. 1. Broadcasting and recording studio. Commercial and public communications uses including radio and television broadcasting and receiving stations and studios, with facilities entirely within buildings. Does not include transmission and receiving apparatus such as antennas and towers. 2. Park and ride facility. A designated area where a vehicle may be left in order for the driver to carpool with other commuters or to ride public transit. 3. Parking facility. A parking lot or parking structure used for parking motor vehicles where the facility is the primary use of the site. Parking structures and lots that are developed in conjunction with another primary use of the site to satisfy the on-site parking requirements for the development are not included in this definition. 4. Transit facility. A maintenance and service center for the vehicles operated in a mass transportation system. Includes buses, taxis, railways, monorail, etc. 5. Utility facility and infrastructure, fixed-base structures. Fixed-base structures and facilities serving as junction points for transferring utility services from one transmission voltage to another or to local distribution and service voltages. These uses include any of the following facilities that are not exempted from land use entitlements by Government Code section 53091: electrical substations and switching stations, natural gas regulating and distribution facilities, public water system wells, treatment plants and storage, telephone switching facilities, wastewater treatment plants, settling ponds, and disposal fields. These uses do not include office or customer service centers(classified in offices)or equipment and material storage yards. 6. Utility facility and infrastructure, pipelines. Pipelines for potable water, reclaimed water, natural gas, and sewage collection and disposal, and facilities for the transmission of electrical energy for sale, including transmission lines for a public utility company. Also includes telephone, telegraph, cable television, and other communications transmission facilities utilizing direct physical conduits. 7. Wind energy system, small. A machine which can convert kinetic energy in wind into a usable form of electrical or mechanical energy intended primarily for on-site consumption, but may transfer excess energy into the electrical grid. E. Retail, service, and office uses. 1. Adult day care facility. State-licensed facility that provides nonmedical care and supervision for more than six adults for periods of less than 24 hours, with no overnight stays. 2. Adult-oriented business. a. Adult bookstore or adult video store.A commercial establishment which has as a significant or substantial portion of its stock-in-trade or derives a significant or substantial portion of its revenues or devotes a significant or substantial portion of its interior business or advertising to the sale, rental for any form of consideration, of any one or more of the following: i. Books, magazines, periodicals, or other printed matter or photographs, films, motion pictures, videocassette tapes, digital video discs, slides, tapes, records, compact Page 6 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 discs, or other forms of visual or audio representations which are characterized by an emphasis upon the depiction or description of specified sexual activities or specified anatomical areas. ii. Instruments, devices, or paraphernalia which are designed for use or marketed primarily for stimulation of human genital organs or for sadomasochistic use or abuse of themselves or others. b. Adult cabaret. A nightclub, theater, concert hall, auditorium, bar, or other similar establishment that regularly features live or media presentations of performances by topless or bottomless dancers, go-go dancers, exotic dancers, strippers, or similar entertainers where such performances are distinguished or characterized by an emphasis on specified sexual activities or specified anatomical areas. C. Adult motel. A motel, hotel or similar commercial establishment which: i. Offers public accommodations, for any form of consideration,which provides patrons with closed-circuit television transmissions, films, motion pictures, videocassettes, DVDs, CDs, slides, or other photographic reproductions which are characterized by the depiction or description of specified sexual activities or specified anatomical areas and which advertise the availability of this sexually oriented type of material by means of a sign visible from the public right-of-way, or by means of any off-premises advertising including but not limited to, newspapers, magazines, pamphlets or leaflets, radio or television; ii. Offers a sleeping room for rent for a period of time less than ten hours; or iii. Allows a tenant or occupant to sub-rent the sleeping room for a time period of less than ten hours. d. Adult news rack. Any coin-operated machine or device that dispenses material substantially devoted to the depiction of specified sexual activities or specified anatomical areas. e. Adult theater. An enclosed or unenclosed building, to which the public is permitted or invited, used for presenting any form of audio or visual material, and in which a substantial portion of the total presentation time is devoted to the showing of material which is distinguished or characterized by an emphasis on depiction or description of specified sexual activities or specified anatomical areas. f. Adult viewing area.An area in any adult book and/or novelty store, cabaret,theater, motion picture arcade or other adult entertainment business, where a patron or customer would ordinarily be positioned for the purpose of viewing or watching a performance, picture show, or film. g. Bathhouse. An establishment or business that provides the services of baths of all kinds, including all forms and methods of hydrotherapy during which specified anatomical areas are displayed or specified sexual activity occurs. 3. Alcoholic beverage sales. The retail sale of beverages containing alcohol for off-site consumption subject to regulation by the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) as an off-sale establishment. On-site alcoholic beverage sales are included in the definitions for bar/nightclub and restaurant. 4. Ambulance service. Emergency medical care and transportation, including incidental storage and maintenance of vehicles. 5. Animal sales and grooming. Retail sales of domestic and exotic animals, bathing and trimming services, and boarding of said animals for a maximum period of 72 hours conducted entirely within an enclosed building with no outdoor use. Boarding for periods longer than 72 hours is considered a kennel. Page 7 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 6. Art, antique, collectable shop. Retail sales uses including antique shops, art galleries, curio, gift, and souvenir shops, and the sales of collectible items including sports cards and comic books. Stores selling handcrafted items that are produced on the site are defined separately as artisan shops. 7. Artisan shop. A retail store selling art glass, ceramics,jewelry, and other handcrafted items and supplies needed to create finished items, where the facility includes an area for the crafting of the items being sold. 8. Bail bonds. A business providing a bond or obligation on behalf of a prisoner to insure the prisoner's appearance in court at the return of the writ. 9. Banks and financial services. Financial institutions such as banks and trust companies, credit agencies, holding (but not primarily operating) companies, lending and thrift institutions, and investment companies. Freestanding exterior automated teller machines (ATM) are considered an accessory use and not part of this definition. 10. Bar/nightclub. Any bar, cocktail lounge, discotheque, or similar establishment, which may also provide live entertainment (e.g., music and/or dancing, comedy, subject to an entertainment permit) in conjunction with alcoholic beverage sales. These facilities do not include bars that are part of a larger restaurant. Includes bars, taverns, pubs, and similar establishments where any food service is subordinate to the sale of alcoholic beverages. Bars and nightclubs may include outdoor food and beverage areas. 11. Bed and breakfast inn. A residential structure with one family in permanent residence with up to six bedrooms rented for overnight lodging, where meals may be provided subject to applicable health department regulations. A bed and breakfast inn with more than six guest rooms is considered a hotel or motel and is included under the definition of hotels and motels. 12. Building materials store and yard. A retail establishment selling lumber and other large building materials, where most display and sales occur indoors. Includes stores selling to the general public, even if contractor sales account for a major proportion of total sales. Includes incidental retail ready-mix concrete operations, except where excluded by a specific zoning district. Establishments primarily selling electrical, plumbing, heating, and air conditioning equipment and supplies are classified in wholesale, storage, and distribution (heavy, light and medium). Hardware stores are listed in the definition of "retail, general," even if they sell some building materials. Also see Home improvement supply store for smaller specialty stores. 13. Business support services. Establishments primarily within buildings, providing other businesses with services such as maintenance, repair and service, testing, rental, etc. Support services include, but are not limited to: a. Equipment repair services (except vehicle repair, see Vehicle services); b. Commercial art and design (production); C. Computer-related services (rental, repair); d. Copying, quick printing, and blueprinting services (other than those defined as printing and publishing); e. Equipment rental businesses within buildings (rental yards are storage yards); f. Film processing laboratories; g. Heavy equipment repair services where repair occurs on the client site; h. Janitorial services; i. Mail advertising services (reproduction and shipping); j. Mail box services and other"heavy service" business services; k. Outdoor advertising services; and Page 8 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 I. Photocopying and photofinishing. 14. Call center. An office equipped to handle a large volume of calls, especially for taking orders or servicing customers. 15. Card room. A gambling establishment that offers card games for play by the public. 16. Check cashing business. An establishment that, for compensation, engages in the business of cashing checks, warrants, drafts, money orders, or other commercial paper serving a similar purpose. Also includes establishments primarily engaged in cashing payroll or personal checks for a fee or advancing funds on future checks. This classification does not include a state or federally chartered bank, savings association, credit union, or similar financial institution (see Banks and financial services). 17. Child-care facility/center.A facility installed,operated, and maintained for the nonresidential care of children as defined under applicable state licensing requirements for the facility. Such facilities include, but are not limited to, infant centers, preschools, extended day care facilities, or school- age child-care centers as defined in this title. 18. Commercial cannabis activity. Any location providing for the cultivation, possession, manufacture, distribution, processing, storing, laboratory testing, packaging, labeling, transportation, delivery or sale of cannabis and cannabis product for medical, non-medical, or any other purpose and includes the activities of any business licensed by the state or other government entity under Division 10 of the California Business and Professions Code, or any provision of state law that regulates the licensing of cannabis businesses. Commercial cannabis activity does not include the cultivation, possession, storage, manufacturing, or transportation of cannabis by a qualified patient for his or her personal medical use so long as the qualified patient does not provide, donate, sell or distribute cannabis to any other person. Commercial cannabis activity also does not include the cultivation, possession, storage, manufacturing,transportation, donation or provision of cannabis by a primary caregiver, exclusively for the personal medical purposes of no more than five specified qualified patients for whom he or she is the primary caregiver, but who does not receive remuneration for these activities except for compensation in full compliance with California Health and Safety Code section 11362.765. 19. Consignment store. A retail store where goods are placed on consignment, which is the act of placing goods in the hands of another, while still retaining ownership, until the goods are sold. 20. Convenience store. An easy access retail store of 5,000 square feet or less in gross floor area, which carries a range of merchandise oriented to convenience and travelers' shopping needs. These stores may be part of a service station or an independent facility. 21. Crematory services. An establishment providing services involving the care, preparation, and disposition of human and/or animal remains by means of cremation. Uses typically include, but are not limited to, crematories and crematories with embalming services. 22. Drive-in and drive-through sales and service. A use where a customer is permitted or encouraged, either by the design of physical facilities or by the service and/or packaging procedures offered, to be served while remaining seated within an automobile including, but not limited to, drive-through food, financial services, and automatic car washes. 23. Equipment sales and rental. Service establishments with outdoor storage/rental yards, which may offer a wide variety of materials and equipment for rental (e.g., construction equipment). 24. Feed and tack store. A retail store selling animal food and equestrian supplies. 25. Furniture, furnishing, and appliance store. A store engaged primarily in selling the following products and related services, including incidental repair services: draperies, floor coverings, furniture, glass and chinaware, home appliances, home furnishings, home sound systems, interior decorating materials and services, large musical instruments, lawn furniture, movable spas and hot tubs, office furniture, other household electrical and gas appliances, outdoor furniture, refrigerators, stoves, and televisions. Page 9 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 26. Garden center/plant nursery. Establishments providing for the cultivation and sale of ornamental trees, shrubs, and plants, including the sale of garden and landscape materials (packaged and/or bulk sale of unpackaged materials) and equipment. 27. Grocery store/supermarket. A retail business where the majority of the floor area open to the public is occupied by food products packaged for preparation and consumption away from the site of the store. Such uses may include up to ten percent of floor area for alcohol sales. These full-service businesses do not typically have limited hours of operation. 28. Gun sales. A business whose primary use is the sale of firearms, ammunition and related materials. 29. Home improvement supply store. An establishment(retail or wholesale)that sells kitchen, bath, carpeting, and other home-oriented supplies. Other retail uses are permitted if accessory to the primary use. These uses may include an expansive showroom. This use classification is a subcategory of the larger building materials stores and yards use classification and may be combined with or separate from such uses. 30. Hookah shop. Any facility or location whose business operation includes as an outdoor accessory use the smoking of tobacco or other substances through one or more pipes (commonly known as a hookah, waterpipe, shisha, or narghile) designed with a tube passing through an urn of water that cools the smoke as it is drawn through it, including but not limited to establishments known variously as hookah bars, hookah lounges, or hookah cafes. 31. Hotel.A facility with guest rooms or suites rented to the general public for transient lodging (less than 30 days). Hotels provide access to most guest rooms from an interior walkway and typically include a variety of services in addition to lodging, for example, restaurants, meeting facilities, personal services, etc.A hotel also includes accessory guest facilities such as swimming pools, tennis courts, indoor athletic facilities, accessory retail uses, etc. 32. Internet cafe.A cafe whose customers sit at computer terminals or bring portable computers and log on to the Internet while they eat and drink. 33. Kennel, commercial.A facility that provides boarding of animals as the primary use of the facility. May also include daytime boarding and activity for animals(e.g., "doggie day-care")and ancillary grooming facilities. Also see Animal sales and grooming. 34. Liquor store. A retail establishment which has 50% or more of the shelving or gross floor area devoted to the public display and sale of alcoholic beverages for off-site consumption. 35. Maintenance and repair, small equipment. Establishments providing on-site repair and accessory sales of supplies for appliances, office machines, home electronic/mechanical equipment, bicycles, tools, or garden equipment, conducted entirely within an enclosed building. Does not include maintenance and repair of vehicles. 36. Massage establishment. Any establishment where customers can receive a massage either as a primary or accessory function and where all massage therapists and practitioners are certified by the California Massage Therapy Council. 37. Medical services, extended care. Residential facilities providing nursing and health-related care as a primary use with inpatient beds, such as board and care homes, convalescent and rest homes, extended care facilities, and skilled nursing facilities. Long-term personal care facilities that do not emphasize medical treatment are included under Residential care home. 38. Medical services, general. Facility primarily engaged in providing outpatient medical, mental health, surgical, and other personal health services, but which is separate from hospitals, including medical and dental laboratories, medical, dental, and psychiatric offices, outpatient care facilities, and other allied health services. Counseling services by other than medical doctors or psychiatrists are included under Office, business and professional. Page 10 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 39. Medical services, hospitals. Hospitals and similar facilities engaged primarily in providing diagnostic services and extensive medical treatment, including surgical and other hospital services.These establishments have an organized medical staff, inpatient beds, and equipment and facilities to provide complete health care. May include on-site accessory clinics and laboratories, accessory retail uses (see the separate definition of "retail, accessory"), and emergency heliports. 40. Mobile hot food truck. Any vehicle, as defined in Vehicle Code section 670, which is equipped and used for retail sales of prepared prepackaged or unprepared unpackaged food or foodstuffs of any kind. For the purposes of this section, a mobile food vehicle shall also include any trailer or wagon equipped and used as described in this paragraph and pulled by a vehicle. 41. Mortuary/funeral home. A funeral home and parlor, where the deceased are prepared for burial or cremation and funeral services may be conducted. This use does not include crematorium, which is a separate use classification. 42. Office, accessory.An office that is incidental and accessory to another business or sales activity that is the primary use (part of the same tenant space or integrated development). The qualification criteria for this definition is that the floor area of the accessory office use shall not exceed 50% of the total net habitable or leasable floor area of the tenant space for a single-use development or the combined floor area of an integrated development for a mixed-use project. 43. Office, business and professional. This use listing includes offices of administrative businesses providing direct services to consumers (e.g., insurance companies, utility companies), government agency and service facilities (e.g., post office, civic center), professional offices (e.g., accounting, attorneys, public relations), and offices engaged in the production of intellectual property (e.g., advertising, architecture, computer programming). This use does not include medical offices (see Medical services, general); temporary offices, or offices that are incidental and accessory to another business or sales activity that is the primary use(see Office, accessory). Outdoor storage of materials is prohibited. 44. Pawnshop. Any room, store, building, or other place in which the business of pawn brokering, or the business of lending money upon personal property, pawns, or pledges, or the business of purchasing articles from vendors or their assignees at prices agreed upon at or before the time of such purchase, is engaged in, carried on, or conducted. 45. Personal services. Establishments providing nonmedical services as a primary use, including, but not limited to, barber and beauty shops (including permanent makeup), weight loss clinics, day spas, spiritualist reading or astrology forecasting, clothing rental, dry cleaning pickup stores with limited equipment, home electronics and small appliance repair, laundromats (self-service laundries), shoe repair shops, and tailors. These uses may also include accessory retail sales of products related to the services provided. This use classification does not include massage or tattoo establishments, which are separately classified herein. 46. Restaurant. A retail business selling food and beverages prepared and/or served on the site,for on- or off-premises consumption. Includes eating establishments where customers are served from a walk-up ordering counter for either on- or off-premises consumption and establishments where most customers are served food at tables for on-premises consumption, but may include providing food for take-out. Also includes coffee houses and accessory cafeterias as part of office and industrial uses. Restaurants are divided into three categories as follows: a. Restaurant, no liquor service. Restaurants that do not serve liquor, including fast food establishments. b. Restaurant, beer and wine. Restaurants with liquor services limited to beer and wine for on-site consumption. May also include the brewing of beer as part of a brewpub or mi^„„ micro-brewery. Page 11 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 C. Restaurant, full liquor service. Restaurants with a full range of liquor service, including beer, wine, and distilled spirits, all for on-site consumption. 47. Retail, accessory. The retail sales of various products and services (including food service) in a subtenant store, space, or other clearly defined/dedicated area that is located within a building occupied by a primary tenant such as a health care facility, hotel, office building, or department store, supermarket, or warehouse store. These uses include, but are not limited to: a. Pharmacies, gift shops, and food services within a health care facility; b. Travel services, convenience stores, and food services within a hotel; C. Food services within an office building; and d. Food services and banking within a department store, supermarket, or warehouse store. The floor area of the subtenant store/unit, space, or other clearly defined/dedicated area occupied by the retail, accessory use shall not exceed 25%of the gross floor area of the primary tenant. 48. Retail, general. Stores and shops selling single and multiple lines of merchandise. These stores and lines of merchandise include, but are not limited to, bakeries(all production in support of on- site sales), clothing and accessories, collectibles, department stores, drug and discount stores, dry goods, fabrics and sewing supplies, florists and houseplant stores (indoor sales, only; outdoor sales are plant nurseries and included in the definition of"garden center/plant nursery"), general stores, gift shops, hardware, hobby materials, musical instruments, parts and accessories, newsstands, pet supplies specialty shops, sporting goods and equipment, stationery, and variety stores. 49. Retail, warehouse club. Retail stores that emphasize the packaging and sale of products in large quantities or volumes, some at discounted prices. Sites and buildings are usually large and industrial in character. Patrons may be required to pay membership fees. 50. Secondhand dealer. Any business where the primary or ancillary use includes buying, selling, trading, accepting for sale on consignment, accepting for auctioning, or auctioning secondhand tangible personal property such as "cash for gold." This use classification does not include a "coin dealer" or participants at gun shows or events, pawnshops or secondhand stores. 51. Shooting range. An establishment in which the primary use is an enclosed firing range with targets for rifle or handgun practice,training,or both.The establishment may include an ancillary retail space for a business that is engaged in the sale, transfer, exchange, leasing or vending of firearms, ammunition and/or related materials. The ancillary retail component may not exceed 25% of the gross floor area and may not engage in businesses related to the operation of pawnshops, secondhand stores or thrift stores as defined in this title. 52. Smoke shop. An establishment that either devotes more than 15% of its total floor area to smoking, drug, and/or tobacco paraphernalia or devotes more than a two-foot by four-foot (two feet in depth maximum) section of shelf space for display for sale of smoking, drug, and/or tobacco paraphernalia. 53. Specialty food store.A store selling specialty food ingredients,which typically preserve,emulsify, color, help process, and in some cases add an extra health dimension to produced food. 54. Tattoo shop.Any establishment that engages in the business of tattooing and/or branding human beings. 55. Thrift store. A retail establishment selling secondhand goods donated by members of the public. 56. Veterinary facility. Veterinary facility that is primarily enclosed, containing only enough cage arrangements as necessary to provide services for domestic and exotic animals requiring acute medical or surgical care with accessory outdoor use that provides long-term medical care. Grooming and boarding of animals is allowed only if accessory to the facility use. Page 12 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 F. Automobile and vehicle uses. dismaRtliRg OF WFeGkiRg A-f auteme-hiles n-.r ether me-ter vehicles, and/or the storage or kee. for sale of parts and equipment resulting from such dismantling or wrecking. includes the re ale r.f Wool and used vehicles orir7 used vohirlo parts-. 2. Auto and vehicle sales and rental. Retail establishments selling and/or renting automobiles, trucks, and vans. Includes the sales and rental of mobile homes, recreational vehicles, and boats. May also include repair shops and the sales of parts and accessories, incidental to vehicle dealerships. Does not include the sale of auto parts/accessories separate from a vehicle dealership (see Auto parts sales), bicycle and moped sales (see Retail, general), tire recapping establishments (see Vehicle services, major), businesses dealing exclusively in used parts (see Recycling facility, scrap and dismantling), or service station, all of which are separately defined. 3. Auto and vehicle sales, autobroker. Establishments providing the service of arranging, negotiating, assisting or effectuating, for a fee or compensation, the purchase of a new or used vehicle, not owned by the broker for a person(s). This use, consistent with the licensing guidelines from the California Department of Motor Vehicles does not allow for the storage or display of vehicles on site. 4. Auto and vehicle sales, wholesale. Wholesale establishments selling new and used vehicles to licensed commercial auto dealers. This use, consistent with the licensing guidelines from the California Department of Motor Vehicles does not allow for the storage or display of vehicles on site. 5. Auto and vehicle storage. Facilities for the storage of operative and inoperative vehicles for limited periods of time. Includes, but is not limited to, storage of parking tow-aways, impound yards, fleet yards and storage lots for automobiles (excluding recreational vehicles), trucks, and buses. Does not include retail sales (see Auto and vehicle sales, wholesale). 6. Auto parts sales. Stores that sell new automobile parts, tires, and accessories. May also include minor parts installation (see Vehicle services). Does not include tire recapping establishments, which are found under Vehicle services, major, or businesses dealing exclusively in used parts, which are included under Auto and vehicle sales, wholesale. 7. Car washing and detailing. Permanent, drive-through, self-service, and/or attended car washing establishments, including fully mechanized facilities. May include detailing services. Temporary car washes (e.g., fundraising activities generally conducted at a service station or other automotive-related business, where volunteers wash vehicles by hand and the duration of the event is limited to one day) are not part of this use classification. 8. Recreational vehicle storage. Facilities for the storage of recreational vehicles for limited periods of time. 9. Service station. A retail business selling gasoline or other motor vehicle fuels. May include a convenience store. Vehicle services which are incidental to fuel services are included under Vehicle services, minor. 10. Vehicle services, major. The repair, alteration, restoration, towing, painting, or finishing of automobiles, trucks, recreational vehicles, boats, and other vehicles as a primary use, including the incidental wholesale and retail sale of vehicle parts as an accessory use. This use includes major engine and/or transmission repair and bodywork-repair facilities dealing with entire vehicles; such establishments typically provide towing, collision repair, other bodywork, and painting services and may also include tire recapping establishments. 11. Vehicle services, minor. Minor facilities specialize in limited aspects of repair and maintenance (e.g., muffler and radiator shops, quick-lube, smog check, and tires). Does not include repair shops that are part of a vehicle dealership on the same site (see Auto and vehicle sales) or Page 13 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 automobile dismantling yards, which are included under Recycling facility, scrap and dismantling. G. Industrial, manufacturing, and processing uses. 1. Commercial (secondary/accessory)—Industrial. On-site, retail sales of products within an industrial building (the subject building) for walk-in customers and/or will call customers who order products via the internet/telephone or at a separate location such as a retail store. This use is secondary/accessory to the primary industrial use(s) that occur on-site and/or within the subject building, such as manufacturing, wholesale, storage, and distribution. The products available for retail sale shall be limited to products that are manufactured on-site or within the subject building, that are primarily sold on a wholesale basis, and/or are stored in, and/or distributed from, the subject building. Such products include, but are not limited to: a. Personal/home electronic equipment and accessories; b. Home improvement materials (tile, flooring, carpet, wall covering, etc.); and C. Automotive accessories (wheels, tires, engine components, etc.). This classification allows, but does not require, physical retail and/or display/showroom space within the subject building. If such space is proposed/required, then the floor area used for that purpose shall only occupy the floor area that was originally designated for the office of the subject building, or 25 percent of the gross floor area of the subject building,whichever is less, and shall be subject to the parking requirements for retail uses as described in Table 17.64.050-1 — Parking Requirements by Land Use. Use of, and/or expansion into, areas of the building previously designated for storage, warehousing, or manufacturing is only permitted if it is demonstrated that the number of parking stalls that exist on-site for the overall subject building complies with the parking requirements described in Table 17.64.050-1. A use not permitted to operate as a principal use, such as a marijuana dispensary, is not permitted within this land use classification. A use that requires a conditional use permit, entertainment permit, or adult entertainment permit in order to operate as a principal use is subject to the same permitting requirements within this land use classification. 2. Commercial(re-purposing)—Industrial. A set of multiple commercial uses operating together as subtenants in a building that was originally designed for a single industrial tenant such as a warehouse, or a single commercial tenant such as a department store. This land use classification applies only to commercial uses that, individually, could not utilize the entire floor space of the subject building and, therefore,would not operate as the sole, primary tenant of the building.This classification does not apply to single tenants/uses that could utilize the entire floor space of the subject building. Characteristics of this land use classification include, but are not limited to: a. An open floor plan with tenant demising walls that do not extend to the ceiling; b. Exterior wall signs that only provide identification of the subject building; C. Common, non-exclusive floor area within the interior of the building, and the exterior in the vicinity of the building, for use by the customers of all tenants; d. Tenant spaces with no direct access to the exterior of the building; and e. Shared parking. All proposals for re-purposing buildings shall require the submittal of a conditional use permit for review and approval by the planning director, and the submittal of a parking study prepared by a qualified traffic/parking engineer for review and acceptance by the director of engineering services/city engineer and planning director. With the exception of specific uses identified in Table 17.30.030-1, a use that is not permitted to operate as a principal use, such as a marijuana dispensary, is not permitted within this land use classification. A use that requires a conditional Page 14 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 use permit, entertainment permit, or adult entertainment permit in order to operate as a principal use is subject to the same permitting requirements within this land use classification. 3. E-Commerce Distribution. Activities that involve the buying, selling, and distribution of products and associated services over the internet or through mobile applications. Products are transported using freight trucks and stored in warehouses or fulfillment centers to then be distributed to designated shipping locations using delivery trucks. Includes the following categories of e-commerce distribution: a. Distribution/Fulfillment Center. A fulfillment center or similar use's primary purpose is storage and distribution of e-commerce products to consumers or end-users, either directly or through a parcel hub. These facilities shall have a minimum gross floor area of 200,000 square feet and a minimum ceiling height of 24 feet. b. Parcel Sorting Facilities. An establishment for sorting and/or re-distribution of parcels or products from distribution/fulfillment centers to a parcel hub via intramodal transit truck--to--truck. c. Parcel Hub. A "last mile" facility or similar establishment for the processing and/or re- distribution of parcels or products.A parcel hub's primary function is moving a shipment from one mode of transport to another for delivery directly to consumers or end-users. 1) Parcel Hub, Large. A parcel hub facility with a minimum gross floor area over 130,000 square feet. 2) Parcel Hub, Small. A parcel hub facility with less than 130,000 square feet in gross floor area. 4. Food processing/manufacturing. Activities include methods of turning fresh foods into food products through various processes including, for example, washing, chopping, pasteurizing, freezing, fermenting, packaging, and cooking. IFUef StOr-age and chstribution. A large scale facility where fuel (such as propane and gasoline) is stored and distributed without retail sale 5. Lumber Yard. Activities include the storage, sale, and display of lumber, wood, and building construction products. Lumber and wood products may be stored outside or within a structure. On-site milling and planing of wood is prohibited. 6. Maker Space. Activities typically include, but are not limited to on-site, small-scale production of tangible goods including assembly of completely hand-fabricated parts or hand-fabrication of custom or craft goods not for mass production. Examples of maker space uses include ceramic studios, fabrics, inlays, needlework, weaving, leatherwork woodwork, 3D printing, laser cutting, local food and beverage production, metal or glass work, candle making, or custom jewelry. Goods are predominantly manufactured and fabricated involving only the use of hand tools or domestic-scaled mechanical equipment and kilns not exceeding 20 square feet in size. Retail sales are permitted on site. Accessory retail areas cannot exceed 30 percent of the maker space floor area. 7. Manufacturing, custom. Activities typically include, but are not limited to, manufacturing, processing, assembling, packaging, treatment, or fabrication of custom-made products. These types of business establishments do not utilize raw materials for their finished products, but rather may utilize semi-finished type of manufactured materials for their custom made-to-order products. The finished products from these business establishments are ready for use or consumption and may include on-site wholesale and retail of the goods produced. Examples of custom manufacturing uses include, but are not limited to household furniture, apparel products, electrical instruments signs and advertising displays, and assembly of bicycle parts. The uses do not produce odors, noise, vibration, or particulates that would adversely affect uses in the same structure or on a same site.Where 24-hour on-site surveillance is necessary, a caretaker's residence may be permitted when approved by a minorconditienat use permit. Page 15 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 8. Manufacturing, Green Technology. Activities typically include, but are not limited to, manufacturing, processing, assembling, packaging, treatment, or fabrication of finished made- to-order products utilizing semi-finished manufactured materials rather than raw materials. Examples of preen technology manufacturing uses include, but are not limited to solar panels, wind turbines, geothermal system components, and batteries for electric vehicles/bicycles. The uses do not typically produce odors, noise, vibration, or particulates that would adversely affect uses in the same structure or on a same site. Where 24-hour on-site surveillance is necessary, a caretaker's residence may be permitted with a minor use permit. heavy. AGW4486 typiGally include, but are not limited to, maR6rfaGt61F1Rg-, 4 n this area may have frequent rag! or truck traffic and the transportation of heavy, large scale products. Activities On this area may generate noose, odor, vibration, illumination, or particulates that may be obnoxious or offensive to persons residing On or conducting business On the vicinity. Characteristics of activities permitted within this area may include massive StFUGtures outside of buildings such as cranes, conveyor systems, cooling towers, or unscreened open air storage of large quantities of raw, semi refined, or finished products. Uses typically include, but are not limited to, computer assembly plants, power plants, industrial fabrication facilities, product manufacturing activities, and aggregate or asphalt yards. Where 24 hour on site surveillance 'is necessary, a caretaker's residence may be permitted when approved by a conditional use permit manufacturing, compound;-,-, o-11 material, processing, assembly, packaging, treatment, o fabrication activities which may have frequent ram! or truck traffic or the transportation of heavy, large scale products. Activities in this area may generate noose, 9&F, vibration, illumination, or particulates that may be obnoxious or offensive to persons residing OF GE)RdUGtIRg business in the vicinity. Uses typically utilize raw materials to fabricate serni finished products which include-, but are not limited to, metal fabricating facilities, open welding shops, lumber woodworking facilities, heavy machine shops, chernical storage and distributing, and plastic plants. Not permitted within this area are uses that massive structures outside of buildings such as- cranes or conveyor systems or unscreened open air storage of large quantities of Manufacturing, hea�y, n7i t. Activities typically include, but are not limited to,semi refined or finished prod ctc 9. Manufacturing, light. Activities typically include, but are not limited to, labor-intensive manufacturing, assembly, fabrication, or repair processes which do not involve large container truck traffic or the transport of large-scale bulky products,but may include limited rail traffic. The new product may be finished in that it is ready for use or consumption or it may be semi-finished to become a component for further assembly and packaging. These types of business establishments are customarily directed to the wholesale market, inter-plant transfer, rather than direct sale to the consumer. Such uses may include, but are not limited to, electronic microchip assembly; printing, publishing, and allied industries; food processing and manufacturing; candy and other confectionery products; bottled or canned soft drinks and carbonated water; apparel and other finished products; paperboard containers and boxes; drugs; medical equipment; and small fabricated metal products such as hand tools, general hardware, architectural, and ornamental metal work and toys, amusement, sports, and athletics goods. The activities do not produce odors, noise, vibration, hazardous waste materials, or particulates that would adversely affect other uses in the structure or on the same site. Where 24-hour on-site surveillance is necessary, a caretaker's residence may be permitted when approved by a Genditienalminor use permit. 10. Manufacturing, n7edium. Activities typically include, but are not limited to, manufacturing, compounding of materials, processing, assembly, packaging, treatment or fabrication of materials and products which require frequent large container truck traffic or ram! traffic, or the transport of heavy, bulky iterns. The new products are serni finished to be a component for Page 16 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 further MaRufaGt61FiRg, fabFiGatiGR, and assembly. These types of b6lSiReSS establishMeRts are sale to the dGMGStiG GGRSLJrner. S61Gh uses may ORGlude, but aFe RE)t limited te, GaRRed feed; textile pred6lGtS; fUFRiture and fixtures; GGRVerted paper and paper beaFd predUGtS; plaStiG predUGtS made from PUFGhased rubber, plaStiG, OF FeSiR; fabFiGated metal predyGts made frem Where 24 hour OR Site surveillaRGe 06 ReGessary, a Garetaker's resideRGe may be permitted when o red by o onrli+ionol u permh 11. Microbrewery. A small-scale brewery operation dedicated to the production of specialty beers and producing less than 15,000 barrels(465,000 U.S. gallons) per year.Ancillary on-site tasting and/or retail sales of beers produced on-site for off-site consumption may be permitted when approved by a conditional use permit. 12. Printing and publishing. Establishments engaged in printing by letterpress, lithography, gravure, screen, offset, or electrostatic (xerographic) copying, and other establishments serving the printing trade including bookbinding, typesetting, engraving, photoengraving, and electrotyping. This use also includes establishments that publish newspapers, books, and periodicals, and establishments manufacturing business forms and binding devices. Does not include "quick printing" services or desktop publishing which are included in "business support services." 13. Recycling facility, collection. A recycling facility used for the acceptance by donation, redemption, or purchase of recyclable materials from the public that does not occupy more than 500 square feet. This classification may include a mobile unit, kiosk-type units that may include permanent structures, and unattended containers placed for the donation of recyclable materials.Also includes so-called"reverse vending machines,"an automated mechanical device that accepts one or more types of empty beverage containers including, but not limited to, aluminum cans, glass bottles, and plastic bottles, and issues a cash refund or a redeemable credit slip with value of not less than the container's redemption value as determined by the state. 14. Recycling facility, processing. A recycling facility located in a building or enclosed space and used for the collection and processing of recyclable materials. Processing means the preparation of material for efficient shipment or to an end-user's specifications by such means as baling, briquetting, compacting, flattening, grinding, crushing, mechanical sorting, shredding, cleaning, and remanufacturing. Collection of recycling materials as the sole activity is included in the definition of Recycling facility, collection. 15. Recycling faciliV, scrap and dismantling. Uses engaged On the assembling, breaking up, sorting, temporary storage, and distribution of recyclable or reusable scrap and waste materials. This use does not include landfills or other terminal waste disposal sites. Also see Auto Vehicle Dismantling for related use for automobiles. Collection of recycling materials as the sole activity is included in the definition of Recycling facility, collection 16. Research and development. Indoor facilities for scientific research, and the design, development, and testing of electrical, electronic, magnetic,optical, and mechanical components in advance of product manufacturing, that is not associated with a manufacturing facility on the same site. Includes, but is not limited to, chemical, medical, and biotechnology research and development. Does not include computer software companies (see Office, business and professional), soils and other materials testing laboratories (see Business support services) medical laboratories (see Medical SeFV'GeS, general). 17. Storage, personal storage facility. A structure or group of structures containing generally small, individual, compartmentalized stalls or lockers rented as individual storage spaces and characterized by low parking demand. Page 17 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 18. Storage warehouse. Facility for the storage of furniture, household goods, or other commercial goods of any nature. Includes cold storage. Does not include warehouse, storage, or mini- storage facilities offered for rent or lease to the general public (see Storage, personal storage facility) or warehouse facilities in which the primary purpose of storage is for wholesaling and distribution (see Wholesale, storage and distribution (heavy, medium and light)). 19. Storage yard. The storage of various materials outside of a structure other than fencing, either as an accessory O of use. 20. , warehousing, storage, freight handling, shipping, trucking services and terminals, and storage and wholesaling from the premises of unfinished, raw, or serni refined products requiring further processing, fabrication, or manufacturing. Typical uses include, but are not limited to, trucking forms, and the wholesaling of and agricultural products. Outdoor storage is permitted. , minerals,permitted. 21. Wholesale, storage, and distribution, light. Activities typically include, but are not limited to, wholesaling, storage, and warehousing services and storage and wholesale to retailers from the premises of finished goods and food products. Activities under this classification shall be conducted in enclosed buildings and occupy 50,000 square feet or less of building space. Retail sales from the premises may occur when approved by a conditional use permit. 22. Wholesale, storage, and distribution, medium. Activities typically include, but are not limited to, wholesale, storage, and warehousing services; moving and storage services; storage and wholesaling to retailers from the premises of finished goods and food products; and distribution facilities for large-scale retail firms. Activities under this classification shall be conducted in enclosed buildings and occupy greater than 50,000 square feet of building space. Included are multi-tenant or speculative buildings with over 50,000 square feet of warehouse space. 23. WorWLive. A building or spaces within a building used jointly for commercial and residential purposes where the residential use of the space is secondary or accessory to the primary use as a place of work. Typical types of work include small-scale, custom manufacturing of goods with limited on-site sales. The dedicated work area must be at least twice the size of the residential area with no more than two inhabitants living on the premises. Work/Live uses are typically found in industrial zones and have a maximum gross floor area of 30,000 square feet. Page 18 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 ARTICLE IV. SITE DEVELOPMENT PROVISIONS Chapter 17.38 OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICTS AND OTHER SPECIAL PLANNING AREAS Sections: 17.38.010 Senior Housing Overlay Zoning District. 17.38.020 Equestrian Overlay Zoning District. 17.38.030 Hillside Overlay Zoning District. 17.38.040 Haven Overlay Zoning District. 17.38.050 Industrial Commercial Overlay Zoning District. 17.38.060 Foothill Boulevard Overlay Zoning District. 17.38.070 Etiwanda Heights Neighborhood and Conservation Plan. 17.38.080 Large Warehouse Overlay Zoning District. Section 17.38.080 Large Warehouse Overlay Zoning District A. Purpose. The purpose of the Large Warehouse Overlay Zone is to ensure that large industrial buildings of 450,000 square feet or more are located in areas of the City with adequate public services and infrastructure and away from sensitive receptors who may be impacted by air pollutant emissions, noise, and other impacts generated by the predominant uses in such buildings. B. Applicability. Industrial buildings with a gross floor space of 450,000 square feet or more that are developed after the effective date of the ordinance that codified this section shall be located within the Large Warehouse Overlay Zone. The Large Warehouse Overlay Zone applies to property designated on the zoning map by reference letters "LW" after the reference letter(s) identifying the base zoning district. C. Allowed uses. Permitted uses within the Large Warehouse Overlay Zone are those permitted and conditionally permitted uses within the underlying zoning district. D. Development standards. Development in the Large Warehouse Overlay Zone shall comply with the zoning regulations applicable to the underlying zoning district and any master plan applicable to the subject property. A master plan adopted pursuant to chapter 17.22.020 may also be required for the development of an industrial building located within the Large Warehouse Overlay Zone. PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 ARTICLE IV. SITE DEVELOPMENT PROVISIONS Chapter 17.36 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS BY BASE ZONING DISTRICT Sections: 17.36.010 Development standards for residential zoning districts. 17.36.020 Development standards for mixed use zoning districts. 17.36.030 Development standards for commercial and office zoning districts 17.36.040 Development standards for industrial districts. 17.36.050 Development standards for open space zoning districts. 17.36.040 Development standards for industrial districts. A. Purpose and applicability. The purpose of this section is to establish minimum development standards that are unique to development projects within the Industrial Zoning Districts. Development standards in this section apply to all land designated on the zoning map within an Industrial Zoning District. B. Industrial districts. As identified in chapter 17.26 (Establishment of Zoning Districts), the city includes three Industrial Zoning Districts: Industrial Park (IP), General Industrial (GI), M;Rimum IRgp VHea y IRd6i tFinal (MI/HI), and Heavy i dustrial iun Neo-Industrial (NI), and Industrial Employment (IE). C. Industrial site development standards. General site development standards for Industrial Zoning Districts are listed in Table 17.36.040-1 (Development Standards for Industrial Zoning Districts). These development standards supplement the development standards in article IV(Site Development Provisions)that apply to all zoning districts (e.g., parking, signs, landscaping, and lighting). TABLE 17.36.040-1 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS Development Standard/Zoning District IP GINI AAIIHIIE Lot area (minimum)(') 0.5 ac 0.5 ac 5 ac or 2 ac(2) Lot width (minimum)(3) 100 ft 100 ft 100 ft Min. Setback(ft-)(4) Front yard (and Street Side Yard) See Table 17.36.040-2 Major Arterial and Special Boulevard 45 ft 45 ft 45 ft Secondary 35 ft 35 ft 35 ft Local/Collector 25 ft 25 ft 25 ft Interior Side yard 5 ft(5) 5 ft(5) 5 ft(5) Rear yard 0 ft(5) 0 ft(5) 0 ft(5) Distance Between Buildings Primary buildings Must meet current building code requirements Accessory buildings Must meet current building code requirements 1 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 Max. Building Height f Primary buildings 35 feet at the front setback line(6) Maximum height is :45 f etm 45 ft 45 ft 65 ft Accessory buildings- Detached 4425 ft 4925 ft 4925 ft Accessory buildinqs—Attached Maker Space -- 35 ft 35 ft Floor Area Ratio Latio of building floor area to lot square footage) Floor area ratio 0.4-0.6(8) 50-60%0.4-0.6 nla0.4-0.6(9) Max. Building Footprint(sq. ft.) Primary Building Lpt - 200,000 450,000 Accessory Building-Detached - 5,000 10,000 Accessory Building—Attached Maker Space - 30,000 30,000 Min. Open Space(minimum percentage of open space per parcel or project) Open space/landscape area 15% 10% 10%(2)/5% Performance standards(see chapter 17.66) A BA C/B(2) Table notes: (1) Condominium lots. Condominium lots and lots within an approved master planned development are exempt from required minimum parcel size and dimension requirements. (2) The following applies within 1,000 feet of Arrow Route:minimum 2-acre lot area; 10%minimum landscape area;and the"B"level performance standards(chapter 17.66). (3) Setbacks shall be the minimum required under the city's currently adopted building code. (4) Setback shall be increased to 45 feet when abutting a residential property line or adjacent to Interstate 15. (5) See Table 17.36.040-2 for parcels abutting special boulevards as indicated in Figure 17.36.040-1 (Special Streetscape Requirements). (6) Buildings used for industrial uses that exceed 35 feet in height shall be set back an additional one foot from the front setback line for each one foot of building height up to a maximum setback of 70 feet.The portion of the building used for offices are not subject to this requirement. (7) Heights over 75 feet may be permitted with a conditional use permit. (8) For hotels and motels,the maximum floor area ratio is 1.0(100 percent). (9) Parking structures in the Neo-Industrial (NI) and Industrial Employment 0E)Zoning Districts are exempt from floor area ratio requirements. (10) Conditional use permit approval by the city council is required for all industrial buildings larger than 75,000 square feet in gross floor area.See Section 17.20.060(Conditional use permit).A master plan is required for all industrial buildings Iargerthan 450,000 square feet in gross floor area.See Footnote 1 in Table 17.14.060-1 (Approving Authority for Land Use Entitlements). D. Other miscellaneous industrial development standards. 1. Special streetscape. Future development and redevelopment within industrial areas shall be consistent with the special streetscape standards listed in Table 17.36.040-2 (Streetscape Setback Requirements) and as depicted in Figure 17.36.040-1 (Special Streetscape Requirements). 2 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 TABLE 17.36.040-2 STREETSCAPE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS Street Type Average Depth of Building Setback(2,3,a,6) Parking Setback(5) Landscape(1,2) Major Arterial,Special Boulevards 45 ft 45 ft 25 ft and Interstate 15 Secondary 35 ft 35 ft 20 ft Local/Collector 25 ft 25 ft 15 ft Table notes: (') The average depth shall be uninterrupted from the face of curb, except for sidewalks, pedestrian hardscape, plazas and courtyards,and monument signs. (2) Parcels less than 225 feet in depth from the ultimate curb face on special boulevards are not required to provide an average depth of landscaping or building setback greater than 25 feet or 20%the depth of the property,whichever is greater. (3) As determined from the face of curb. (4) Average depth of landscaping must still be provided. (5) Street frontage walls and fences over 3 feet in height are subject to building setbacks. (6) Setbacks may be increased based on building height.See Table 17.36.040-1. 2. Accessory maker spaces. Accessory maker spaces are required in or adjacent to all new buildings that exceed 200,000 square feet in gross floor area in the Neo-Industrial (NI) and Industrial Employment OE) Zoning Districts, subject to the following standards: a. A minimum gross floor area of 3,000 sq. ft. and a maximum gross floor area of 30,000 square feet. b. Accessory maker spaces shall face main arterial roads adjacent to the site. C. Maker space building frontages shall include either an at-grade loading area or an above- grade loading area on a terraced entry. 3 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 FIGURE 17.36.040-1 SPECIAL STREETSCAPE REQUIREMENTS Streetscape Setback Requirements for Major Arterials and Special Boulevards 45'Minimum 45'AverageDepth 25'Minimum Building Setback of Landscaping Parking Setback t s Streetscape Setback Requirements for Secondary Streets 35'Minimum 35'AverageDepth 20'Minimum Building Setback of Landscaping Parking Setback i' Streetscape Setback Requirements for Local Streets 25'Minimurn 25'AverageDepth 15'Minimum Building Setback of Landscaping Parking Setback .._ ........ r 3. Special building height standards. Building height limits shall not exceed the height limits prescribed in the LA/Ontario International Airport Compatibility Plan. For areas within the High Terrain Zone, the building height limit shall be 70 feet. Buildings or structures greater than 70 feet in height within the High Terrain Zone are subject to the ONT-IAC Project Notification Process and require a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)exception (Obstruction Evaluation - Form 7460). In cases where the LA/Ontario International Airport Compatibility Plan permits heights greater than 70 feet, building height limits shall be limited to maximum of height of 75 feet, unless a conditional use permit is granted permitting heights greater than 75 feet. 4 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 4. Special height exceptions for ancillary equipment. Within Mini um lw,„aGyHeayy industrial (Ml l=ll) a„d Heavy l„dustr;al (HI) n,s+r;Gts the Industrial Employment (IE)Zoning District, height exceptions may be granted for ancillary equipment with special design and landscape considerations as follows: a. Maximum 90 feet with approval of a minor exception with the additional findings that the ancillary equipment is designed in a manner that integrates well within the subject site and existing and/or proposed landscaping will buffer the views of ancillary equipment from designated view corridors. b. Maximum 120 feet with approval of a conditional use permit with the additional findings that the ancillary equipment is designed in a manner that integrates well within the subject site and existing and/or proposed landscaping will buffer the views of ancillary equipment from designated view corridors. 5. Interim uses. Certain industrial properties may be vacant without any immediate plans for site development. In these instances, the properties may be utilized for a defined list of interim uses for a limited time period as specified hereinbelow. The uses permitted within this section are supplemental to the uses listed in chapter 17.30 (Allowed Land Uses by Base Zoning District). a. Permitted interim uses include agricultural crops, roadside stands, farmers market, community garden, and private parks and picnic areas. b GenditiGRal u Minor use permit required. Prior to the establishment of an interim use, a enditonarminor use permit shall be approved. C. Time period. The maximum time period for an interim use is five years. d. Conditions. At a minimum, the conditions should include an agreement between the city and the applicant stipulating timing, installation of permanent improvements and buildings, and/or restoration of the site to its original condition. At the end of five years, the use shall be removed or the site developed in accordance with the full development regulations of any adopted plan. 6. Interim use standards.The following standards shall apply in all industrial areas for interim uses: a. The minimum streetscape and parking setback requirement shall be contiguous with the ultimate right-of-way line, but in no case less than ten feet. b There shall be No minimum landscape coverage requirements are required, except where necessary for screening purposes as determined by the planning director. C. All parking and storage areas shall be paved with slag, crushed aggregate, asphaltic concrete, concrete, or similar materials. The location, number, and design of the parking and storage areas shall be in accordance with Code requirements. d. All parking and storage areas, and other interim uses which require screening as determined by the planning director, shall be screened from public view through a combination of landscaping and fencing. Fencing may include a six-foot chain-link fence with slats, masonry or concrete,wood, or decorative metal. Screening must be maintained in good condition at all times. e. Landscaping required for screening purposes shall include 15-gallon trees and five-gallon shrubs to provide a dense landscape buffer to afford maximum screening from the public view, satisfactory to the planning director. 7. Rail service. If rail service is needed for properties which adjoin existing or proposed lead or spur lines,the following rail service access standards, unless modified by the rail service provider or the public utilities commission, shall apply: Rail crossings and any spur construction must be approved by the rail service provider and the public utilities commission. The following rail service standards, unless modified by the railroad or the public utilities commission, shall apply: a. Minimum easement width for a lead line, single track shall be 32 feet. b. Minimum easement width for a double rail track shall be 41 feet. 5 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 C. The minimum radius of curvature for a track shall be 180 feet. d. The maximum gradient along spur tracks shall not exceed two percent. e. Dock height shall be no less than 4.5 feet above the top of the spur track. f. Road crossings at grade must be avoided wherever possible. g. Spur trackage is not permitted along any frontage between a building and a public right-of- way and must be confined to the side or rear yard area of the building that the rail spur serves. h. Rail loading areas shall be screened from view from the public right-of-way by a wall that matches the architecture, materials, colors, etc. of the building that the rail spur serves. i. Spur tracks shall not encroach onto/across any required parking stalls. Spur tracks shall not encroach across drive aisles for automobile / heavy truck and/or emergency vehicle access except when it is necessary to connect the main rail line with the rail loading area. j. Lot divisions and building layouts for properties which adjoin existing or proposed lead and spur lines shall be done in a manner to ensure full potential of future rail access and use and should not preclude rail access to other properties adjacent to such rail lines. Subdivisions, which could reduce a property's ability to accommodate potential rail served developments, may not be authorized. k. Building design shall include rail service features to ensure the potential use of available spur lines. I. Finished floor elevations and dock height door or "kick out" wall panels shall be provided in all properties abutting rail lines. m. The above-referenced rail service development standards may be amended or deleted on a site-by-site basis during the development review process. The following must be determined by the planning commission in order to authorize any modification of the rail service standard: i. That the installation of a lead or spur track cannot be accomplished due to physical constraints on or adjacent to the project site; and ii. Other existing or potential rail service properties will not be negatively affected in their ability to accommodate rail service activity as a result of modifications to the standards. 8. Equipment screening. The following eguip;,eRt screening standards shall apply to equipment such as HVAC units, storage tanks, ducting, etc.: a. All roof, wall, and ground mounted equipment shall be screened and not visible from the public right-of-way within the lRd striol Dort(ID)and GeRerol Industrial (GI)ZeRing diStriGtS the Neo-Industrial (NI)Zoning District. b. Wherever possible, all roof, wall and ground mounted equipment shall be screened 494;4 all sodesand not visible from the public right-of-way within the Minimum I,,,r,aGtiHeavy Industrial (MI HI) and Heavy Industrial (HI) zoning distrinto Industrial Employment (IE) Zoning District. C. The visibility of any equipment from the public right-of-way shall be determined by"line-of- sight" and measured from a point that is 6 feet above the finished surface of the centerline of the public right-of-way, e.g. street. d. All screening of roof mounted equipment shall be accomplished with a parapet wall that is consistent and compatible with the architecture, materials, colors, etc. of the building_ Where a parapet wall is not possible, then a screen shall be provided to enclose the roof mounted equipment. This enclosure is exempt from the building height requirement established in Table 17.36.040-1 (Development Standards for Industrial Zoning Districts). Where roof mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork projects less than 18 inches 6 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 above the roof or roof parapet it shall be painted consistent with the color scheme of the building. 9. Design standards. The following design standards apply to all new developments in the Neo- Industrial (NI) and Industrial Employment OE)Zoning Districts: a. Site design standards i. General site design • Site elements such as buildings, parking areas, driveways, sidewalks, and outdoor recreational spaces must be arranged to emphasize the aesthetically pleasing components of the site (e.g., landscaping and the superior architectural design of office building element (refer to b. (Building design standards)) and to screen less attractive elements (e.g., service facilities, loading docks, outdoor storage, equipment areas, and refuse enclosures) through the proper placement and design of buildings, screen walls, and landscaping. • Sites shall have internal sidewalks that connect to sidewalks along public streets to create pedestrian connections. • Loading dock areas shall be located and designed so that they do not face toward (and are not visible from) any adjacent public right-of-way such as a street. These areas shall be screened with walls or fences and landscaped (Insert cross reference to applicable landscaping/screening sections). • All refuse, storage, and equipment areas placed outside of a building shall be screened from adjacent public rights-of-way and uses. ii. Block Network Parameters for Public Streets. • Intersection spacing along arterial edges shall be between 1/8 mile and '/4 mile with at least one mid-block intersection between intersecting arterials and rail, flood control, utility or freeway corridors. • Intersection spacing inside arterial/arterial blocks bounded by arterials shall be a minimum of 200 feet and a maximum of 1,320 feet. • Buildings greater than 400,000 sq.ft. in size shall have public streets on at least 3 sides. • A minimum of 1 public street shall run parallel with and within 500 feet of rail (excluding spurs), flood control, utility, or freeway corridors. The parallel street shall run through the block. Street crossings at intersecting corridors shall be established on a case-by-case basis based on feasibility and needs by the City Engineer. • Intersections along arterials shall be aligned with existing/proposed intersections on the opposite side of the arterial where possible and meet minimum design standards for offsets or clearance from adjacent corridors as required by the City Engineer. • Two distinct points of connection shall be provided through an internal block network to the arterial street network for every industrial parcel. iii. Parking location and design • Surface parking shall be located to the side or to the rear of principle buildings to the greatest extent feasible. • Surface parking stalls for employees and quests&hallmay incorporate shade structures that are capable of supporting solar/photovoltaic array systems with a minimum clearance height of 12 feet. A minimum of 50 percent of the required parking stalls shall include these shade structures for this purpose. • The shade structures shall not encroach into the required access lanes. 7 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 • The applicable tree and landscaping standards are not required in the sections of the parking areas where solar arrays systems are placed. See Section 17.56.060.N.1.b (Exception for solar collectors). • All new development within the Neo-Industrial (NI) and Industrial Employment (IE) Zoning Districts requires a Parking management plan, see Section 17.64.070 (Parking management plan). iv. Open space • An outdoor seating/break area is required for every proposed and potential office area of a building • On-site open space areas shall contain an outdoor seating/break area with seating designed to allow a variety of sitting environments. • Outdoor seating areas shall provide shade under a suitable structure and wind protection using landscaping or transparent screening structures. • Outdoor seating areas shall be easily accessed from the lobby or interior break rooms and placed at the corner of the building or along the side of a building facing a public street. • Outdoor seating areas are included within the minimum open space requirement in Table 17.36.040-1 (Development Standards for Industrial Zoning Districts). v. Landscaping, screening, and street trees • All new industrial developments shall adhere to the standards in Chapter 17.56 (Landscaping standards) in addition to the standards provided below. In the event of a conflict, the most restrictive standard shall apply. • Landscaping shall be provided along the public streets and sidewalks to define the street edge, buffer pedestrians from vehicles, and provide shade. • All new trees planted within the public right-of-way or to screen the front, side or rear of a building, and to screen the building from Interstate 15 shall be a minimum 24-inch box and planted 25—30 feet apart. • Trees shall be selected and planted to provide shade for walkways, outdoor seating areas, parking areas etc. and for their ability for filtering particulate matter and other pollutants from the air. • Walls and fences used to provide screening of loading facilities, outdoor trash receptacles, utility equipment, etc. must be solid and designed with materials and finishes that are consistent with and complimentary to the design of the primary buildings. Fences used for security purposes or around parking areas shall consist of wrought iron, tubular steel, or similar material. The use of chain-link is prohibited. Landscape materials as required in accordance with Chapter 17.56 (Landscaping Standards) may compliment the requirements for screening, but landscaping without a screen wall or fence does not meet the minimum screening requirement of this section. • When redevelopment occurs, new public streets as required by the city engineer shall be designed in compliance with the city's Complete Streets policies, public sidewalks along the frontage of the property being developed are required. • All new sidewalks shall be a minimum of 6 feet or wider as designated by the cites engineer based on existing or planned adjacent land uses to ensure compliance with the city's Complete Streets policies, separated from the curb by a planted parkway, and installed parallel to the property line or curb. Meandering sidewalks along any frontage are prohibited. 8 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 b. Building design standards i. Building orientation and placement. • Buildings shall have articulated and transparent frontages along a minimum of 50 feet on both sides of the building that define the corner. • Office and administration buildings associated with an industrial use shall be placed at the corner of a building at the intersection of two public streets and/or a main arterial road. The building corner shall have a prominent, vertical structural element (e.g. a tower)that protects no more than 15 feet above the maximum allowable height of the building and that occupies a maximum of 5 percent of the building roof area. In addition, raised parapets with enhanced decorative treatment such as cornices or crenellations are permitted not to exceed 8 feet above the maximum allowable height of the building. If an office or administration building is located at the intersection of two arterial streets the height of the tower or raised parapets may be increased an additional 25 percent. • The primary entrance to accessory maker spaces and an office/administration building must face the corner or an adjacent main arterial road. • Where feasible, equipment, electrical, and service rooms shall be placed within the footprint of the building, i.e. inside the building, or screened so that it is not visible from the public right-of-way. ii. Building facade articulation. • Primary building entries shall be readily identifiable and well-defined using projections, recesses, columns, roof structures, or other design elements. • All elevations of a building's facade shall include modulation and articulation of the wall plane and roof line, proportionate to the height and length of the building. Exceptions to this requirement are the wall planes at the dock areas and the rear elevation of the building. • All elevations of a building's facade must have vertical or horizontal variations in color, texture, material, and ornamentation. • The office component of building facades must contain offset or recessed structural bays, and protecting elements such as colonnades or bay windows. • Shade elements such as canopies, awnings, arcades, and overhangs shall be provided over all windows, and at all pedestrian entry points, along the front elevation, any street-facing elevation, and office portions of the building. • Roofs shall be designed as an integral component of building form, mass, and facade, particularly along the front and office portions of the building. Building form shall be enhanced by sloped or offset roof planes, eave heights, and rooflines. iii. Materials and detailing • The front and office portions of buildings must be constructed of high-quality materials, including, but not limited to, brick, stone, textured cast stone, tinted masonry units, concrete, glass, and metal siding. • The following materials are prohibited along the front and office portions of the building: 1. Unadorned, plain or painted concrete block or panels; 2. Reflective glass; and 3. Vinyl, fiberglass, asphalt, or fiberboard siding. 9 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 • Where feasible, the industrial/warehousing portion of the building must include a variety of materials and architectural elements to break up the linear planes of these building. Ideally, the building's design and architecture must express the nature of the industrial activity within, in keeping with the other requirements of this section and while respecting the functionality of the use within the building. iv. Door and window openings • For office portions of principle buildings, window and door openings must comprise at least 60 percent of the total area of exterior walls facing a public street. • These windows must be clear or translucent to improve visibility, add visual interest, and allow light into interior spaces. v. Lighting • Decorative lighting fixtures shall be provided with a minimum 1-foot candle illumination level above that of surrounding parking lots at vehicle driveways and driveway entry/exits, pedestrian pathways, plazas and courtyards, and other activity areas. • Building and landscape accent up-lighting shall be incorporated into the lighting plan for the development site, with a focus along the front and office portions of the building. • All exterior lighting shall be shielded to prevent glare and light trespass onto adjacent properties and streets. • Lighting systems shall be architecturally compatible with surrounding buildings to express the unique character of the area. 10 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 ARTICLE IV. SITE DEVELOPMENT PROVISIONS Chapter 17.48 FENCES, WALLS,AND SCREENING Sections: 17.48.010 Purpose. 17.48.020 Permit requirements and exemptions. 17.48.030 Location and height requirements. 17.48.040 Materials and maintenance. 17.48.050 Requirements by land use type. 17.48.040 Materials and maintenance. A. Fencing, wall, and screen materials. Fences, walls, and screens shall be constructed of attractive, long-lasting materials and architecturally integrated with the building design and with existing fences/walls on the site. The following limitations apply: 1. Fences and gates approved for screening purposes in residential districts shall be solid wood with steel frames, solid vinyl, tubular steel or wrought iron. Where tubular steel wrought iron is used, it shall be backed by solid or perforated metal sheeting painted to match the fence or gate. In new developments, decorative block walls shall be used. 2. Fences and gates approved for screening purposes in industrial or commercial districts shall be metal, tubular steel, or wrought iron (open fencing shall be backed by solid or perforated metal sheeting painted to match the fence or gate). In the Industrial Zoning Districts the requirements for fences,walls, and screening provided in Section 17.36.040.D.9.a.v(Landscaping, screening, and street trees) shall also apply. 3. Chain-link fences and/or gates are not permitted for screening purposes in any zoning district, (including the Industrial Zoning Districts), including chain-link when backed with wood or plastic slats, solid plastic sheet, or knitted fabric privacy/wind screening,except On the Heavy incl str District. 4. Alternative materials may be approved by the planning director or planning commission as part of a discretionary entitlement approval. B. Graffiti-resistance. Graffiti-resistant aesthetic surface treatment shall be required for all fences and walls adjacent to a public right-of-way, in a residential zone, or as determined though the site development review process. C. Maintenance. Fences, walls, and screens shall be continuously maintained in an orderly and good condition, at no more than their maximum allowed height. (Code 1980, § 17.48.040; Ord. No. 855, § 4, 2012; Ord. No. 863 §4, 2013) 17.48.050 Requirements by land use type. A. Applicable to all land use types. 1. Fencing and walls forpools, spas, and similar features. Swimming pools, spas, and other similar water features shall be enclosed in compliance with building code requirements. 2. Fences, walls, and screening between different land uses. Commercial and industrial uses shall be screened from adjacent residential zoning districts by plant materials and a solid, decorative masonry wall with a minimum height of six feet to screen the commercial use, as approved by the designated approving authority. Openings or pedestrian connections may be required at the 1 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 discretion of the designated approving authority. A landscaping strip with a minimum width of five feet shall be installed adjacent to a screening wall-on the commercial or industrial sick facing the public street. 3. Temporary fences. Nothing in this chapter shall be deemed to prohibit the erection of a temporary fence around construction projects in compliance with the building code and other applicable requirements of this Code. 4. Screening standards for fire district connections and double check devices. All ground-mounted equipment is required to be screened according to the following standards. Option A is preferred. Option C should only be used if the other two options are considered infeasible by the planning director. Additional provisions apply to fire check valves (as noted). a. Option A;block wall screen. i. Required materials are decorative block,finished stucco. or a wall designed to match building architecture. ii. Minimum height is three feet with a maximum height of four feet. iii. Minimum three feet clearance between the equipment and the wall. b. Option B;metal screen with vines and equipment painted green. i. Provide metal screen fence painted dark green. ii. Plant climbing vines along the base of the screen. iii. Minimum three feet clearance between the equipment and the screen. iv. If concrete pad is provided around the base of the equipment, the pad must be a minimum of three feet from the property line to allow installation of landscaping. V. Minimum two feet from the face of the screen and the property line. vi. Paint the equipment dark green or equivalent. C. Option C;landscape screen and equipment painted green. i. This option can only be considered if the equipment can be adequately screened by two rows of five-gallon shrubs. Otherwise only Option A or B may be used. ii. Provide two rows of five-gallon shrubs. iii. Spaced 18 inches on center. iv. Minimum three feet clearance between the equipment and the shrubs in required. V. If a concrete pad is provided around the base of the equipment, the pad must be a minimum of two feet from the property line to allow installation of landscaping. vi. No minimum clearance between the property line and the landscaping is required. d. Additional requirements for fire district check valves. i. Maximum five feet overall from the equipment and the property line. ii Signage shall be provided according to fire district standards. iii. The fire district connection must extend beyond the wall or landscaping and must not obstruct the fire district connection. B. Fencing and walls for agricultural land uses. All fences or walls which enclose livestock shall be constructed of an adequate height and shall be designed so as to control and contain such livestock at all times. C. Residential zoning districts. 1. Trail fences and gates shall be kept in good repair at all times, including replacing damaged members and maintaining plumb. This shall not preclude the property owner from replacing the existing trail fence with another fence or wall material. 2 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 2. Height. The height of fences in residential district is limited according to the following table. TABLE 17.48.050-1 MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF FENCES AND WALLS IN REQUIRED YARD AREA Location of Fence/Wall/Screening Location or Minimum Maximum Height(1) Setback of Fence (1),(2) Required front yard area 0 ft(2) 3 ft/6 ft(3) Required rear and interior side yard area (along rear 0 ft 6 ft and interior property lines) Required street side yard area (along corner side 5 ft(2) 6 ft property lines) At intersections of streets, alleys, and driveways Varies(4) 36 in within the clear visibility triangle All other areas of lot 0 ft 6 ft Table notes: As part of site development review, design review(minor or major),or other discretionary entitlement,the designated approving authority may grant additional height or location requirements to enclose or screen specific areas or uses or for fences and walls designed for noise attenuation. (2) Setback area for street side yard is measured property line to the fence or wall. (3) Height of front yard fence or wall may be increased to a maximum of six feet if the top three feet of fencing is constructed of material that is 90 percent visually open and transparent(e.g., picket fence, open wood slats, open wrought iron)including any architectural features designed as part of the fence(e.g., pilasters and lights). (4) See definition of clear vision triangle in section 17.126(Universal Definitions). 3. Outdoor recreation courts. Fencing for outdoor recreation courts (e.g., tennis courts, basketball courts) shall not exceed 12 feet in height and shall be located five feet from any rear or side property lines, except when adjacent to outdoor recreation courts on adjacent properties. D. Commercial, office, and mixed use zoning districts. 1. Outdoor storage (including all dumpsters, commercial items, commercial construction, or industrial-related materials and equipment within commercial zoning districts)shall be fenced or screened from view. Such screening shall utilize enclosures including, but not limited to,fences, walls, landscaping, or earthen berms,so that no outdoor storage is visible from any public rights- of-way, parks, public trails, and adjacent properties. Screening shall be visually compatible with the primary buildings and landscape on the property. 2. Screening of commercial loading docks and refuse areas. Loading docks and refuse storage areas shall be screened from public view, adjoining public streets and rights-of-way and residentially zoned areas.The method of screening shall be architecturally compatible with other on-site development in terms of colors and materials. Trash enclosures shall be consistent with city standard drawings. Exceptions may be permitted through the administrative design review process for sites with unique characteristics (e.g., shallow lot depth, adjacency to single-family residential). E. Industrial zoning districts. 1. Storage area/screening. The purpose of storage area/screening regulations is to allow for on- site storage,which is screened from view from the public right-of-way or from adjacent properties accessible to the public and is architecturally compatible with the surrounding environment. The following standards shall apply according to land use category: a. Standards for storage area/screen wall height in all industrial zoning districts. The height of all storage area/screening walls shall not exceed eight feet, measured from the finished grade immediately adjacent to the wall and the top of the wall. 3 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 b. Industrial Park (IP Zoning District. No outdoor storage shall be permitted except for fleet vehicles and light trucks (not exceeding 6,000 pounds). Outdoor storage tanks may be permitted at a height not to exceed eight feet from highest finished grade when screened from public view by walls constructed of concrete, masonry, or other similar materials. C. General industrial Gateger;es Neo-Industrial (NI) Zoning District. All materials, supplies, equipment, loading docks, and trucks and trailers shall be stored within an enclosed building or an area screened from public view. d Minimum i aGt heavy ind stFial and heavy r dustFial Gategerres Industrial Employment (IE)Zoning District.All materials, supplies, equipment, and operating trucks shall be stored within an enclosed building or storage area. Such storage areas within 120 feet of a street frontage shall be screened. e. Within 600 feet of the 1-15 right-of-way, all outdoor storage shall be screened from public view from the freeway. Screening may include from the 1-15 freeway may considerthe use or combination of block or masonry walls,_berming dense landscapir,n 36-inch box trees planted a maximum of 30 feet apart, or the building mass. f. Within all industrial land use categories, all storage area screening shall be architecturally integrated with surrounding buildings utilizing concrete, masonry,or other similar materials. For walls comprised of the combination of a screen wall on top of a retaining wall, the overall height of the combined wall may exceed eight feet provided that the part of the wall that faces the public right-of-way (street, sidewalk, etc.), does not exceed the maximum height established in section 17.48.050.E.1.a 8XGeed eight foot iR height imeas�gyred from the finished grade immediately adjacent to the wall and the tern of the wall). g. Within the heavy it dust4a] Industrial Employment (IE) Zoning District, storage area screening may include masonry or concrete walls and, metal, or wood fences. The front and exterior side area shall be screened with non-opaque fencing, when loading areas or storage areas are not present. h. Storage of materials or equipment shall not exceed screen height within 100 feet of street- fronting screens. i. The planning director may waive screening requirements where future building expansion would screen an abutting storage area. i. The planning director may waive screening requirements along the front and exterior side of the building if there are no loading docks or storage areas present. 2. Security fences and walls. The purpose of security fencing and wall standards is to provide for a safe environment for businesses within the industrial area. a. Site planning, including building configuration and placement, is encouraged to create defined areas that may be adequately secured. b. Any wall or fence along a street frontage over three feet in height is subject to the streetscape setback requirements. C. Within all industrial land use categories except Heavy Indust the Industrial Employment OE) Zoning District, all fencing or walls shall be wrought iron, concrete, masonry, or other similar materials, not to exceed the maximum height established in section 17.48.050.E.1.a not to exceed a height of eight feet from highest finished grade as described in section 17.48.050E..i.e. The use of barbed wire or similar materials is prohibited from these land use categories. Chain-link fencing is not permitted in the area(s) of a property that is/are located between the public right-of-way (street, sidewalk, etc.), and the building wall plane(s) of the building(s) on the property, that face(s) the public right-of-way. Chain-link fencing may only be used along the side and rear property lines, and within the interior of the property, if the fencing will not be visible from any portion of the public right-of-way that is adjacent to the property. 4 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 d. Within the heavy industrial category Industrial Employment (IE) Zoning District, security fencing may include wrought iron, masonry or concrete walls, and wood or metal fences., or chain link with wood slats. Barbed wire may be permitted atop fencing. e. Security gates are subject to site plan review according to section 17.16.110 (Site Development Review). 3. Trash enclosures. City standard drawings shall be used for all trash enclosures. 5 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT April 2021 ARTICLE IV. SITE DEVELOPMENT PROVISIONS Chapter 17.56 LANDSCAPING STANDARDS Sections: 17.56.010 Purpose. 17.56.020 Applicability. 17.56.030 Landscape and irrigation plans. 17.56.040 Landscape plan review process. 17.56.050 General landscape development standards. 17.56.060 Special landscape requirements. 17.56.070 Residential landscape development standards. 17.56.080 Removal and replacement of required landscaping. 17.56.090 Parkway landscaping. 17.56.050 General landscape development standards. A. General location for landscape improvements. Landscaping shall be provided in the following locations for all types of development as listed below, unless the designated approving authority determines that the required landscape is not necessary to fulfill the purposes of this chapter. Nothing in this chapter is intended to discourage landscape areas outside and beyond the minimum requirements listed herein. 1. Setbacks. All setback areas required by this Code shall be landscaped in compliance with this chapter except where a required setback is occupied by a sidewalk or driveway,or is enclosed and screened from abutting public rights-of-way. In the Neo-Industrial (NI) and Industrial Employment (IE) Zoning Districts only the front and exterior side yard setback areas adloining public rights-of-way are required to be landscaped, including the property frontage within the right-of-way. All other areas within these Industrial Zoning Districts must be paved or surfaced to minimize dust. 2. Undeveloped areas. All areas of a project site not intended for a specific use or purpose in conjunction with a current application, including pad sites being held for future development, shall be landscaped in compliance with this chapter. 3. Parking areas. Within parking lots, landscaping shall be used for shade and climate control, to enhance project design, and to screen the visual impact of vehicles and large expanses of pavement consistent with the requirements of this chapter. B. Plant type. Landscape planting shall emphasize drought-tolerant and native species (especially along natural, open space areas), shall complement the architectural design of structures on the site, and shall be suitable for the soil and climatic conditions specific to the site. In the wildland-urban interface fire area, planting shall emphasize wildfire hazard reduction. 1. Planting layout and plant diversity. Plant selection shall vary in type and planting pattern. Informal planting patterns are preferred over uniform and entirely symmetrical planting patterns. Use of deciduous flowering trees and shrubs and colorful plantings is encouraged in conjunction with evergreen species. Groupings of shrubs shall contain multiple plant types, interspersed with varying heights and blooming seasons for year-round interest. 2. Street and parking lot trees. Street and parking lot trees shall be selected from the city's adopted master list of street trees and parking lot trees. A minimum of 30 percent of the street trees and parking lot trees, respectively, shall be an evergreen species. For parking lots in the Industrial 1 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT April 2021 Zoning Districts with primary buildings greater than 200,000 sf in gross floor area, a minimum of 50 percent of the street trees and parking lot trees shall be an evergreen species. 3. Trees planted within ten feet of a street, sidewalk, paved trail, or walkway shall be a deep-rooted species or shall be separated from hardscapes by a root barrier to prevent physical damage to public improvements. 4. In the wildland-urban interface fire area, plant types shall not include those identified as fire prone or those types that are specifically prohibited by the fire district. C. Planting size, spacing, and planter widths. In order to achieve an immediate effect of a landscape installation and to allow sustained growth of planting materials, minimum plant material sizes, plant spacing, and minimum planter widths (inside measurements) are as follows: 1. Trees. The minimum planting size for trees for commercial, office, and community/civic uses shall be 15-gallon, with 25 percent of all trees on a project site planted at a minimum 24-inch box size. For commercial, office, and community/civic uses, and industrial develepme^}, tree spacing within perimeter planters along streets and abutting residential property shall be planted no farther apart on center than the mature diameter of the proposed species. Minimum planter widths for trees shall be between five feet and ten feet, consistent with the city's adopted master list of street trees and parking lot trees. 2. Trees in industrial zoning districts. a. The minimum planting size for trees for industrial uses shall be 15-gallon with 25 percent of all trees on a project site planted at a minimum 24-inch box size b. The minimum planting size for trees for industrial uses in primary buildings greater than 200,000 square feet in gross floor area shall be minimum 24-inch box size,-with 25 percent of all trees at 36-inch box size. C. -Tree spacing for all industrial uses within perimeter planters along streets and abutting residential property shall be planted no farther apart on center than the mature diameter of the proposed species. Minimum planter widths for trees shall be between five feet and ten feet, consistent with the city's adopted master list of street trees and parking lot trees. 3. Shrubs. Shrub planting shall be a minimum five-gallon size, with a 15-gallon minimum size required where an immediate landscape screen is conditioned by the designated approving authority (e.g., screening of headlights from drive-through aisles). The minimum planter width for shrubs is four feet. 4. Ground cover. Plants used for mass planting may be grown in flats of up to 64 plants or in individual one-gallon containers. Rooted cuttings from flats shall be planted no farther apart than 12 inches on center, and containerized woody, shrub ground cover plantings shall be planted no farther apart than three feet on center in order to achieve full coverage within one year. Minimum planter width for ground cover is two feet, with the exception of sod, which requires a minimum planter width of six feet. D. Synthetic turf. Synthetic turf may be used as a substitute for natural turf for the purposes of water conservation. The following standards shall apply to the use and maintenance of synthetic turf. 1. Synthetic turf shall consist of lifelike individual blades of grass that emulate real grass in look and color and have a minimum pile height of one and one-half inches. 2. A proper drainage system shall be installed underneath to prevent excess runoff or pooling of water. 3. Synthetic turf shall be installed and maintained to effectively simulate the appearance of a well maintained lawn. 4. The use of indoor or outdoor plastic or nylon carpeting as a replacement for synthetic turf or natural turf shall be prohibited. 2 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT April 2021 5. Synthetic turf shall be installed in combination with natural plant materials (e.g. trees, shrubs and groundcover)to enhance the overall landscaping design. E. Water efficiency. If applicable, projects are required to comply with provisions within chapter 17.82 (water efficient landscaping) of this article. (Code 1980, § 17.56.050; Ord. No. 855, § 4, 2012; Ord. No. 860 §4, 2013; Ord. No. 879 §4, 2015) 17.56.060 Special landscape requirements. In addition to the general requirements of section 17.56.050 (general landscape development standards), the requirements listed below apply to the special types of landscaping. However, in the wildland-urban interface fire area, the fire district requirements preclude the application of these special types of landscaping. A. Residential landscape. See section 17.56.070 (additional requirements for residential areas). B. Project entry landscaping. Entries to multi-tenant projects (both residential and nonresidential) shall be designed as a special statement reflective of the character and scale of the project to establish identity for tenants, visitors, and patrons. Flowering access plantings and specimen trees shall be used to reinforce the entry statement. C. Trees adjacent to building walls.With the exception of single-family housing developments,trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of building dimenSieRS length, particularly to interrupt expansive horizontal and vertical surfaces. Tree clusters may be used to satisfy d8Si R bjeGtives subject to approval bV the approving authority. D. Screening of drive-through aisles. To screen vehicles and associated headlights in a drive-through lane from view of abutting street rights-of-way, a minimum five-foot wide planter shall include a minimum three-foot tall (maximum four-foot tall) landscape barrier planted with trees and other landscaping consistent with those in the parking area.At no time shall this landscape barrier be pruned in a manner that allows the vehicle headlights from the drive-through lane to be visible from abutting street rights-of-way. Plantings shall also be designed to discourage potential safety issues (e.g., persons lying in wait). E. Screening of outdoor equipment. Screening is required according to chapter 17.48(fences,walls, and screening). F. Wireless communication facilities. Where feasible, facilities shall be installed so as to maintain and enhance existing landscaping on the site, including trees, foliage, and shrubs, whether or not utilized for screening. Additional landscaping may be planted around the tower and related equipment to buffer abutting residential zoning districts or uses and to buffer public trails. Specifically, landscaping around the perimeter of the facility(leased area)shall include dense tree and shrub plantings with the necessary irrigation. Trees shall be fast-growing evergreen species, with a minimum size of 24-inch box. Shrubs shall be a minimum 15-gallon size covering a minimum planter area depth of five feet around the facility. Trees and shrubs shall be planted no farther apart on center than the mature diameter of the proposed species. G. On-site pedestrian pathways. Pedestrian pathway landscaping shall include shade trees placed so as to cover 60 percent of the total pathway area with tree canopies within 15 years of securing building permit. H. Creeks. To the extent that landscaping or planting is required or provided along creeks, such landscaping shall be native plants. I. Public spaces. Pedestrian space landscaping shall include a combination of shade trees and pedestrian shading devices (e.g. canopies, awnings, and umbrellas) placed so as to cover 60 percent of the total space with a shade canopy within 15 years of securing the building permit. 3 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT April 2021 J. Signs. Landscaping shall be provided at the base of the supporting structure of freestanding signs equal to twice the area of one face of the sign. For example, 50 square feet of sign area requires 100 square feet of landscaped area. K. Buffering between uses. A landscape buffer shall be provided between residential and nonresidential uses and between single-family uses and multi-family uses containing three or more units. Buffer areas shall include a minimum ten-foot wide planter strip with shrubs and both deciduous and evergreen trees planted a maximum of 30 feet on center. L. Interior property boundaries. When a landscaped area is provided, trees shall be planted at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of interior property line within a planter area that is a minimum of six feet wide. Tree clusters may be used subject to approval by the approving authority+^ satisfy SpeGifi.G dGSigR E)Ne tiVeS M. Sound walls/masonry walls. Where setback and open space areas are screened from public view by walls or similar approved structures, landscaping shall be provided such that 50 percent of the wall shall be covered by landscape material within five years. N. Parking lot landscape. Parking lot landscape includes perimeter planters, abutting parking lots and drive aisles, tree planting for parking lot shade, and a combination of continuous planting strips, planting fingers, and parking islands throughout the parking lot. Parking lot landscape requirements applicable to commercial, industrial, mixed-use, and multi-family residential parking lots with five or more spaces are listed below: 1. Number of trees required. Trees shall be required at a rate of one tree for every three parking stalls. At maturity, trees should reach a minimum height and spread of 40 feet so as to form a shade canopy over parking stalls;_ Smaller ornamental trees may not be used to satisfy this requirement. The minimum width for planters containing a parking lot tree is six feet. Tree selections shall be approved by the planning director. a. Number of trees required in industrial zoning districts. Trees shall be required at a rate of one tree for every five parking stalls within a planter area that is a minimum of 10 feet in width. Tree clusters may be used subject to approval by the approving authority. b. Exception for solar collectors. The minimum requirement for trees and shrubs in Industrial Zoning Districts shall be waived for the portion of a parking area over which photo-voltaic solar collectors are installed where they also function as shade structures. 2. A minimum of ten percent of the total off-street parking area shall be landscaped with trees, shrubs, and appropriate ground cover. The parking area shall be computed by adding the areas used for access drive aisles, stalls, maneuvering, and landscaping within that portion of the premises that is devoted to vehicular parking and circulation. 3. Each unenclosed parking facility shall provide a perimeter landscaped strip at least five feet wide (inside dimension) where the facility adjoins a side or rear property line. The perimeter landscaped strip may include any landscaped yard or landscaped area otherwise required and shall be continuous, except for required access to the site or parking facility. 4. Screening. All surface parking areas shall be screened from streets and adjoining properties, and the open space areas between the property line and public street right-of-way shall be landscaped with a combination of trees, shrubs, and ground cover. Screening between residential and nonresidential uses shall not be less than five feet in height. Parking lot landscaping shall be located so that pedestrians are not required to cross unpaved areas to reach building entrances from parked cars (see Figure 17.56.060-1 [Parking Lot Landscaping]). 5. Existing trees. Existing mature trees on the site in good health shall be preserved whenever possible. 6. Planter design. All parking lot planters shall be designed to meet the following minimum requirements (see Figure 17.56.060-2 [Parking Lot Planter Design]): 4 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT April 2021 a. Planters shall be separated from maneuvering and parking areas by a six-inch, raised concrete curb or equivalent. b. Tree planting wells located at the front of parking stalls shall contain a minimum of 25 square feet and the smallest outside dimension shall not be less than five feet. C. Landscape planters along the sides of parking stalls shall contain a minimum of 90 square feet and the smallest outside dimension shall not be less than six feet. FIGURE 17.56.060-1 PARKING LOT LANDSCAPING Landscape Screen Low Profile Wall Landscape Screen ��r N_ qr Go 0 ✓_ >� Low Profile Wall G Berm 5 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT April 2021 FIGURE 17.56.060-2 PARKING LOT PLANTER DESIGN 90 SQ FT.Minimum Planter 5' Along Side of Stall 5' 16' 0R 5' S, 25 50 FT.Minimum Planter Along Per Stall Front (Code 1980, § 17.56.060; Ord. No. 855, §4, 2012; Ord. No. 879§4, 2015) 6 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 ARTICLE IV. SITE DEVELOPMENT PROVISIONS Chapter 17.64 PARKING AND LOADING STANDARDS Sections: 17.64.010 Purpose. 17.64.020 Applicability. 17.64.030 Permit and plan check requirements. 17.64.040 General parking and loading requirements. 17.64.050 Number of parking spaces required. 17.64.060 Reductions in parking requirements. 17.64.070 Parking management plan 17.64.080 Parking requirements for the disabled. 17.64.090 Parking and driveway design and development. 17.64.100 Loading area requirements. 17.64.110 Bicycle parking requirements. 17.64.120 Electric vehicle parking requirements. 17.64.130 Maintenance. 17.64.050 Number of parking spaces required. A. The following number of parking spaces shall be required to serve the uses or buildings listed, as established in Table 17.64.050-1 (Parking Requirements by Land Use). Multiple property owners may apply for a conditional use permit for shared parking pursuant to section 17.64.060 (Reductions in Parking Requirements). Otherwise, all uses must provide the sum of the requirements for each individual use.Where the requirements result in a fractional space,the next larger whole number shall be the number of spaces required. In addition, the requirements listed below shall apply. 1. "Square feet' means "gross square feet" and refers to the sum gross square feet of the floor area of a building and its accessory buildings unless otherwise specified. 2. For the purpose of calculating residential parking requirements, dens, studies, or other similar rooms that may be used as bedrooms shall be considered bedrooms. 3. Where the number of seats is listed to determine required parking, seats shall be construed to be fixed seats. Where fixed seats provided are either benches or bleachers, one seat shall be construed to equal 18 linear inches for pews and 24 inches for dining, but in no case shall seating be less than determined as required by the building code. 4. When the calculation of the required number of off-street parking spaces results in a fraction of a space, the total number of spaces shall be rounded up to the nearest whole number. 5. Where private streets are proposed for residential development, resident and guest parking shall be provided as determined by the approving authority in conjunction with the required planning entitlement(s). 6. For projects on commercial, office and industrial zoned properties, square footage dedicated to office hallways 44 inches or less, electrical and mechanical rooms, elevator shafts, stairwells, bathrooms and storage closets may be deducted from the gross square footage for parking stall calculation purposes. 7. For all warehouse/storage/e-commerce uses in the industrial zoning districts, the established minimum parking requirements are intended targets. Reductions in the amount of required parking appropriate for a specific use(s) may be approved by the approving authority based on 1 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 the approval of a parking management plan as well as through the conditional use permit and master plan processes, as applicable. See footnote 1 in Table 17.14.060-1 (Approving Authority for Land Use Entitlements). TABLE 17.64.050-1 PARKING REQUIREMENTS BY LAND USE Use Spaces Notes Residential Single-family detached dwellings 2 per unit 2 in garage Multi-family development(condominium, townhome, etc.), semi-detached single-family(zero lot line, patio homes, duplexes, etc.), and mobile home parks 0) -Studio 1.3 per unit 1 in garage or carport -One bedroom 1.5 per unit 1 in garage or carport -Two bedrooms 2 per unit 1 in garage or carport -Three bedrooms 2 per unit 2 in garage or carport - Four or more bedrooms 2.5 per unit 2 in garage or carport -Visitor(additional required) 1 per 3 units Commercial, Service, and Office Uses Shopping centers - Less than 25,000 square feet Varies See individual uses -25,000 to 599,000 square feet 5 per 1,000 sf Centers built prior to 1988 4.5/1,000 -599,000 to 1,000,000 square feet 5.5 per 1,000 sf or a parking Centers built prior to 1988 study may be provided require 4.5/1,000 - Food service (if over 15%of GLA)(2) +1 per 100 sf Additional applied to floor area of food service use -Cinemas in centers less than 100,000 square feet +3 per 100 seats (occupying less than 10%of GLA)(2) -Cinemas in centers of 100,000 to 200,000 square feet, +3 per 100 additional parking only required after the first 750 seats -Offices (if over 10%of GLA)(2) - Parking study required -Shopping center over 1,000,000 square feet - Parking study required Carwash and detail (full-service) 16 stalls Carwash (self-service and drive-thru) 2.5 per wash bay Service/gas station 3.0 per 1,000 sf+2 per service bay Barber shops/beauty parlors Park at retail Laundromats and/or dry cleaners Park at retail Offices,financial institutions, retail stores 4 per 1,000 sf 2 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 Use Spaces Notes Commercial storage yards (e.g., contractors, salvage) 6 spaces Separated from enclosed storage area Includes area of open area Lumber yard 4 per 1,000 sf devoted to display of lumber and other products Mortuaries and funeral homes 1 per 35 sf Applies only to the assembly room floor area Motels and hotels 1 per unit+2 2 additional spaces for manager Customer parking (additional Vehicle sales, repair, service 2.5 per 1,000 sf spaces needed for vehicle storage related to business operations) Furniture and appliance stores 2 per 1,000 sf Day cares/preschools 1 per employee+ 1 per 5 children Storage for utility-owned Public utilities uses 1 per 2 employees(2 vehicles must also be minimum) provided for Commercial Recreation Uses Bowling alleys and/or billiard halls 5 per alley and/or 2 per table Stables 1 per 5 horses Driving ranges 1 per tee Additional parking required for related uses on site Golf courses 6 per hole Additional parking required for related uses on site Miniature golf course 3 per hole Additional parking required for related uses on site Includes related uses and all Skating rinks 5 per 1,000 sf indoor and outdoor"active" areas Included related uses and all Swimming pool (commercial) 5 per 1,000 sf indoor and outdoor"active" areas Tennis, handball, and racquetball facilities 3 per court Additional parking required for related uses on site Health clubs and other fitness related facilities 5 per 1,000 sf Educational Uses Elementary and junior high schools 2 per classroom Senior high school 1 per employee+ 1 per 6 students Colleges, universities 1 per 2 employees+ 1 per 3 students Commercial schools (trade, business colleges, etc.) 1 per student+ 1 per faculty 3 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 Use Spaces Notes Medical/Health Uses Dentist, medical, veterinary offices/clinics 5 per 1,000 sf Congregate care facilities(e.g., nursing, children's, 1 per 4 beds Based on resident capacity sanitariums) Hospitals 1.75 per bed Places of Assembly Restaurants and lounges 10 per 1,000 sf Fast-food restaurant 10 per 1,000 sf Auditoriums,sports arenas,stadiums 1 per 3 seats or 1 per 35 sf Movie theaters of seating area -Single screen 1 per 3 seats - Multi-screen 1 per 4 seats 1.5 linear feet on a bench is 1 per 3 seats or 1 per 35 sf equivalent to 1 seat; Other places of assembly(e.g., churches) of main auditorium schedule of activities and/or parking study may be required Industrial, Warehousing, and Manufacturing(3)(4) 1 per 1,000 sf for first 20,000 Warehouse/Storage/E-Commerce sf; 1 per 2,000 sf for the next 20,000 sf; and 1 per 4,000 sf for the remaining sf Industrial/manufacturing 2 per 1,000 sf Research and development 3 per 1,000 sf Office and administration 4 per 1,000 sf Multi-tenant buildings (office less than 35 percent GLA)(2) 2.5 per 1,000 sf Indoor wholesale/retail commercial 4 per 1,000 sf Table notes: (') Fifty percent of the total required covered spaces shall be within enclosed garage structures.The use of carports requires approval from the design review committee. (2) GLA is gross leasable area. 0) See section 17.64.100.D.4(Trailer parking required)for trailer parking requirements. (4) See section 17.64.120(Electric vehicle parking requirements)for electric vehicle parking requirements. B. Uses not listed. Other uses not specifically listed in this section shall furnish parking as required by the designated approving authority in determining the off-street parking requirements. The approving authority shall be guided by the requirements in this section generally and shall determine the minimum number of spaces required to avoid interference with public use of streets and alleys. (Code 1980, § 17.64.050; Ord. No. 855, §4, 2012; Ord. No. 863 §4, 2013) 17.64.060 Reductions in parking requirements. A. The required number of parking spaces may be reduced in accordance with the following requirements. 4 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 B. Shared parking. In order to encourage efficient use of parking spaces and good design practices, the total parking requirements for conjunctive uses shall be based on the number of spaces adequate to meet various needs of the individual uses operating during the peak parking period. 1. Conditional uJJse permit for shared parking. A conditional use permit may be approved for shared parking facilities serving more than one use on a site or serving more than one property. The conditional use permit may allow for a reduction of the total number of spaces required by this chapter if the following findings are made: a. The peak hours of parking demand from all uses do not coincide so that peak demand will not be greater than the parking provided. i. The efficiency of parking provided will equal or exceed the level that can be expected if parking for each use were provided separately. 2. Shared parking agreement. A written agreement between the landowners and in some cases the city that runs with the land shall be filed, in a form satisfactory to the city attorney, and include: a. A guarantee that there will be no substantial alteration in the uses that will create a greater demand for parking without application for approval of an amended conditional use permit. b. A reciprocal grant of nonexclusive license among the business operator(s) and the landowner(s)for access to and use of the shared parking facilities. C. Evidence that the agreement has been recorded in the county recorder's office. C. Other parking reductions. Required parking for any use except a single-family dwelling, accessory dwelling unit, or two-family dwelling may be reduced through approval of a minor exception by the planning director. Required parking may be reduced with approval of a conditional use permit for all new industrial uses in the Neo-Industrial (NI) and Industrial Employment(IE)Zoning Districts. 1. Criteria for approval.The planning d+restof-approving authority will only grant a minor use permit or a conditional use permit for reduced parking if it fonds isdetermined that the project meets all of the minor use permit criteria in section 17.16.120 (Minor use permits) or the conditional use permit criteria in section 17.20.060 (Conditional use permit), and that three or more of the circumstances listed below are true. a. The use will be adequately served by the proposed parking due to the nature of the proposed operation; proximity to frequent transit service; transportation characteristics of persons residing, working, or visiting the site; or because the applicant has undertaken a travel demand management program that will reduce parking demand at the site. b. Parking demand generated by the project will not exceed the capacity of or have a detrimental impact on the supply of on-street parking in the surrounding area. C. The site plan is consistent with the objectives of the zoning district and incorporates features such as unobtrusive off-street parking placed below the ground level of the project with commercial uses above or enclosed parking on the ground floor. d. The applicant has provided on-site parking for car-share vehicles via a recorded written agreement between the landowner and the city that runs with the land. Agreement shall provide for proof of a perpetual agreement with a car-share agency to provide at least one car share vehicle on-site. 2. Application submittal requirements. In order to evaluate a proposed project's compliance with the above criteria, the planning director may require submittal of a parking demand study that substantiates the basis for granting a reduced number of spaces. D. Mixed use parking. All mixed use projects shall include a parking study prepared by a qualified traffic/parking consultant that demonstrates how proposed land uses utilize the parking spaces that are required per section 17.64.050-1. Parking studies are subject to review and acceptance by the 5 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 director of engineering services/city engineer and planning director, and an independent peer review consultant. The parking study may also include a discussion of the following options for a reduction of required parking, including, but not limited to: 1. Shared parking may be provided per section 17.64.060 B. 2. State density bonus may be provided per chapter 17.46. 3. Tandem parking may be counted towards the required parking calculation. 4. Implement a parking management strategy that may contain the following provisions, but are not limited to: a. Monitored with periodic inspections; b. Storage within the unit, and not within garage (view windows on garages); C. HOA to enforce limitation of number of vehicles per unit; d. Time restriction on guest parking; and e. Shuttles that cater to users within the development. 5. Implement a car/bicycle share program in which vehicles/bicycles are made available for shared use to individuals on a short term basis. (Code 1980, § 17.64.060; Ord. No. 855, §4, 2012; Ord. No. 881 §4, 2015; Ord. No. 938 § 9, 2018) E. Industrial use parking— "land banking". 1. If the final end-user has not been determined for an industrial development for which entitlements are requested pursuant to the provisions of this Code, and the parking and loading demand characteristics for the use are unknown, the anticipated maximum amount of employee, truck, and trailer parking specified in Table 17.64.050-1 (Parking Requirements by Land Use) shall be determined. In addition, the director may require the submittal of a parking and loading demand study to be prepared by the applicant or by the city and funded by the applicant. Such a study shall estimate the parking demand for the likely proposed use(s) including a worst case scenario based on the recommendations of the Institute of Traffic Engineers, Urban Land Institute, the American Planning Association, or other acceptable source of parking demand data for uses and/or combinations of uses of comparable activities, scale, bulk, area, and location. 2. The applicant shall submit a site plan acceptable to the director showing how all the parking for employees, trucks, and trailers will be provided on the site in compliance with the applicable requirements of this chapter. However, if the director determines that not all of the parking is required for the final proposed use(s), then subject to the provisions of section 17.14.100 (Modification), the excess "land banked" parking may be identified on the approved site plan and not constructed until such time as the parking is required for a future use(s). These areas shall be set aside as open space and landscaped in such a manner that they will not be used for parking. In addition, a binding covenant or other legal agreement in a form acceptable to the city attorney shall be submitted and signed by the property owner and tenant guaranteeing that the reserved open space will be constructed for employee, truck or trailer parking if a change to a more parking-intensive use occurs. 3. The applicant shall conduct a study of actual parking use to be carried out by a qualified consultant at the time of change of tenancy or within three years after the facility is fully occupied and the use established or at other such earlier time as deemed necessary by the director due to observed parking deficiencies or traffic queuing. The parking study shall be subject to approval by the director. The city may require construction of some or all of the additional parking if the parking study demonstrates need. If the owner fails to comply, the city may, but shall not be obligated to, undertake construction of the required additional parking. Any costs and expenses incurred by the city shall be the responsibility of the owner. 6 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 17.64.070 Parking management plan A. Purpose. This section provides regulatory standards governing the requirements of parking management plans in the Neo-Industrial (NI) and Industrial Employment (IE) Zoning Districts. The purpose of the plan is to minimize traffic, manage on-site circulation, and effectively allocate parking needs for each industrial site. B. Applicability. A parking management plan shall be provided as part of a comprehensive effort for establishing employee, quest, truck, and trailer parking in a new industrial development within the Neo-Industrial (NI) and Industrial Employment (IE) Zoning Districts and how those spaces are managed. C. Parkinq management plan. A parking management plan shall be processed as a part of the site development review, subject to approval of the planning commission. The plan shall comply with the following: 1. The parking management plan shall be based on a parking study documenting parking demand beyond the minimum allowance in Table 17.64.050-1 (Parking Requirements by Land Use). 2. The parking management plan shall identify the location of specific parking facilities and the number of parking spaces in such facilities that are available to meet the parking demand of the new development. 3. Parking identified on the plan shall be delineated as being reserved for employees, guests, trucks, or trailers, and whether other access control measures are used to ensure the availability and enforcement of the plan as well as on-site vehicle circulation. 4. The parking analysis shall demonstrate that parking for all users is provided, identifying existing supply and demand for similar uses and what will be provided on site. 5. The owner or manager designee of a development approved under the parking management plan shall provide an accurate and current record of the uses and parking allocation for the development. The planning director maV require this record to be provided or updated annually if it is determined that parking for the proposed use is impacting adjacent streets, and when the owner applies for a change in use or development plan review for the subject site. 17.64.080 Parking requirements for the disabled. A. Number of spaces, design standards. Parking spaces for the disabled shall be provided in compliance with the building code and state and federal law. B. Reservation of spaces required. The number of disabled accessible parking spaces required by this chapter shall be reserved by the property owner/tenant for use by the disabled throughout the life of the approved land use. C. Upgrading of markings required. If amendments to state or federal law change standards for the marking, striping, and signing of disabled access parking spaces, disabled accessible spaces shall be upgraded in the time and manner required by law. (Code 1980, § 17.64.070; Ord. No. 855, § 4, 2012) 17.64.090 Parking and driveway design and development. A. Surface parking area. All surface parking areas shall have the following improvements: 1. Each required parking space and aisle shall be graded, drained, and surfaced so as to prevent dust, mud, or standing water and shall be identified by pavement markings, wheel stops, entrance and exit signing, and directional signs, to the satisfaction of the city engineer. All new parking spaces shall be painted with double stripe pavement markings. 7 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 2. Lighting, giving a ground-level illumination of one to five footcandles, shall be provided in the parking area during the time it is accessible to the public after daylight. Lighting shall be shielded to prevent glare on contiguous residential properties. 3. Where such parking area abuts a street, it shall be separated by an ornamental fence, wall, or compact evergreen hedge having a height of not less than two feet and maintained at a height of not more than four feet. Such fence, wall, or hedge shall be maintained in good condition. 4. Parking spaces shall be marked and access lanes clearly defined. Bumpers and wheel stops shall be installed,as necessary. 5. Landscape materials are permitted to overhang the curb/wheel stop creating a reduction in impervious surface material. B. Driveway location standards. Development projects located at intersections shall be accessed as follows: 1. Driveways to access parcels located at the intersection of two streets shall, where feasible, be gained through driveways from the lesser street. Determination of which street is lesser shall be made based on total paving width, amount of traffic, adjacent traffic controls, and likely destinations along each street in question. 2. Driveways serving parcels located at the intersection of two streets shall be situated at the maximum practical distance from the intersection. 3. Where a proposed driveway is located at least 75 feet from the nearest cross street, the requirements of section 17.64.90.C.1 and 2 may be waived. C. Driveway size and composition. All residential driveways shall be a minimum of 19 feet in length and shall be constructed with a lasting, durable surface (e.g., concrete, asphalt, grasscrete, or similar material) and shall be constructed to appropriate requirements as determined by the city. (Code 1980, § 17.64.080; Ord. No. 855, §4, 2012; Ord. No. 860 §4, 2013) 17.64.100 Loading area requirements. A. Required loading spaces for delivery and distribution. A building, or part thereof, having a floor area of 10,000 square feet or more that is to be occupied by any use requiring the receipt or distribution by vehicles or trucks of material or merchandise must provide at least one off-street loading space, plus one additional such loading space for each additional 40,000 square feet of floor area. The off-street loading space(s) must be maintained during the existence of the building or use it is required to serve. Truck-maneuvering areas must not encroach into required parking areas,travelways, or street rights- of-way (see Figure 17.64.090-2 (Loading Areas for Delivery)). B. Required loading spaces for customers. Customer loading spaces allow bulky merchandise to be loaded into customers' vehicles. For uses that sell bulky items (furniture, appliances, home improvement sales, etc.), at least two customer loading spaces per business establishment or one customer loading space per 40,000 square feet of floor area, whichever is greater shall be provided. Customer loading spaces shall be located adjacent to the building or to an outdoor sales area where bulky merchandise is stored and shall be clearly visible from the main building entry or through directional signage visible from the main entry. Customer loading spaces shall not be located in such a way that they impede on-site traffic circulation, as determined by the director of engineering services/city engineer or encroach into designated emergency vehicle/fire access lanes as determined by the fire chief(see Figure 17.64.090-1 (Customer Loading Areas). C. Required loading spaces for industrial uses. All industrial uses shall provide a minimum of one loading space per proposed loading bay. For each loading bay proposed, a minimum of one on-site truck queuing space must be provided. Each on-site truck queuing space shall be a minimum of nine feet in width and 65 feet in length and shall be included on the circulation management plan if 8 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 required by the approving authority. The truck queuing spaces shall be grouped together in a designated area with clear access to loading bays. D. Requirements for off-street loading spaces. 1. Minimum size. Each off-street loading space required by this section must be not less than 12 feet wide, 30 feet long, and 15 feet high, exclusive of driveways for ingress and egress and maneuvering areas. Loading spaces for customers may be 12 feet wide, 26 feet long, and 12 feet high. 2. Driveways for ingress and egress and maneuvering areas. Each off-street loading space required by this section must be provided with driveways for ingress and egress and maneuvering space adequate for trucks, per city standards. 3. Location of loading areas. An off-street loading space (excluding loading spaces for customers) required by this section must not be located closer than 30 feet to any lot or parcel of land in a residential district, unless such off-street loading space is wholly enclosed within a building or on all sides by a wall not less than eight feet in height. Except in industrial zoning districts, a loading door or loading dock that is visible from a public street must be screened with an eight- foot high, solid masonry or other sound-absorbing wall, with landscaping planted between the wall and the right-of-way. 4. Trailer parking required. One parking space of,parking for a trailer is required for each loading dock door. The minimum dimensions of a single trailer parking space is 50 feet in length, 14 feet in width, and 14 feet in vertical clearance. Trailer parking spaces shall be located in a designated area located away from the loading bays and paths of travel. All trailer parking areas must be screened according to the provisions of section 17.48.050 (Requirements by land use type) for industrial areas. 17.64.120 Electric vehicle parking requirements. The following requirements apply to electric vehicle parking facilities. All charging facilities shall be approved through the plan check/zoning clearance process: A. Electric vehicle charging. When provided, electric vehicle charging stations shall meet the requirements of the California Electrical Code. B. Designated spaces. Outdoor charging of electric vehicle shall only occur in designated electric vehicle spaces, according to the following: 1. Electricity shall only be provided from outdoor electrical outlets installed according to the California Electrical Code. 2. Electric cords shall not cross vehicular or pedestrian pathways. 3. When installed in common parking areas (e.g., surface parking lots, garages, etc.), the spaces shall be restricted to electric vehicles charging only and identified with signage and pavement markings. C. Electric vehicles in single-family residential zoning districts. When installed, electric vehicle charging in single-family residential areas shall be located as follows: 1. Within a garage or carport; 2. Outside of setback area; or 3. If within a setback area, screened from view of the public right-of-way with landscaping or fencing. (Code 1980, § 17.64.110; Ord. No. 855, § 4, 2012) D. Electric vehicles in Industrial Zoning Districts. A minimum of 10 percent of required parking in all new developments within the Industrial Zoning Districts for employees and quests shall be reserved for electric vehicles and shall conform to the standards in subsections A and B above. One charging 9 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 station shall be installed for every two spaces dedicated to electric vehicles. Additionally, charging stations for electric powered trucks maV be required as determined bV the approving authority. 10 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 ARTICLE IV: SITE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Chapter 17.66 PERFORMANCE STANDARDS Sections: 17.66.010 Purpose and intent. 17.66.020 General requirements. 17.66.030 Points of measurement. 17.66.040 Hazardous materials. 17.66.050 Noise standards. 17.66.060 Odor, particulate matter, and air containment standards. 17.66.070 Vibration. 17.66.080 Heat. 17.66.090 Radioactivity or electric disturbance. 17.66.100 Liquid or solid wastes. 17.66.110 Special industrial performance standards. 17.66.110 Special industrial performance standards. A. Purpose. The performance standards allow industrial uses to operate consistent with the overall characteristics of the land use category to provide for a healthy, safe, and pleasing environment in keeping with the nature and level of surrounding industrial activity. The performance standards contained in Table 17.66.110-1 (Industrial Performance Standards) are applied based on the zoning districts as follows: 1. Industrial Park (IP) Zoning District; Class A performance standards. The most restrictive of the performance standards to ensure a high quality working environment and available sites for industrial and business firms whose functional and economic needs require protection from the adverse effects of noise, odors, vibration, glare, or high-intensity illumination, and other nuisances. 2 GeneFal indust4al (Go Zoning Di_1-;_,,Neo-Industrial (NI) Zoning District; Class B performance standards. These standards are intended to enable a complementary mix of uses and provide for the broadest raRge a limited range of industrial activity while assuring a basic level environmental protection. It is the intent of the standards of this section to provide for uses whose operational needs may produce noise, vibration, particulate matter and air contaminants, odors, or humidity, heat, and glare which cannot be mitigated sufficiently to meet the Class A standards. The standards are so designed to protect uses on adjoining sites from effects which could adversely affect their functional and economic viability. 33 Medium imri G04igh Impart (M040 and uoa„„ Industrial (140 epin,v ie�tslndustrial Employment NE)Zoning District;Class C performance standards. It is the intent of the standards of this section to make allowances for industrial uses whose associated processes produce noise, particulate matter and air contaminants, vibration, odor, humidity, heat, glare, or high- intensity illumination which would adversely affect the functional and economic viability of other uses. The standards, when combined with standards imposed by other governmental agencies, serve to provide basic health and safety protection for persons employed within or visiting the area. PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 TABLE 17.66.110-1 INDUSTRIAL PERFORMANCE STANDARDS Class A Class B Class C Noise Maximum •70dB(anywhere on lot) •80 dB(anywhere on lot) •85 dB(lot line) •65 dB(interior space of neighboring use •65dB(at residential property line) •65dB(at residential property line) on same lot) •Noise caused by motor vehicles and •Where a use occupies a lot abutting or •Noise caused by motor vehicles is trains is exempted from this standard. separated by a street from a lot within the exempted from this standard. designated Class A or B performance standard or residential property,the performance standard of the abutting property shall apply at the common or facing lot line. Vibration All uses shall be so operated as not to All uses shall be operated so as not to All uses shall be operated so as not to generate vibration discernible without generate vibration discernible without generate vibration discernible without instruments by the average person while instruments by the average persons instruments by the average person beyond on or beyond the lot upon which the beyond the lot upon which the source is 600 feet from where the source is located. source is located or within an adjoining located.Vibration caused by motor Vibration caused by motor vehicles,trains, enclosed space if more than one vehicles,trains,and temporary and temporary construction and demolition establishment occupies a structure. construction or demolition is exempted is exempted from this standard. Vibration caused by motor vehicles,trains, from this standard. and temporary construction or demolition work is exempted from this standard. Particulate Matter and Air Contaminants In addition to compliance with the Air In addition to compliance with the AQMD In addition to compliance with the AQMD Quality Management District(AQMD) standards,all uses shall be operated so as standards,all uses shall be operated so as standards,all uses shall be operated so as not to emit particulate matter or air not to emit particulate matter or air not to emit particulate matter or air contaminants that are readily detectable contaminants that(a)are injurious to the contaminants that are readily detectable without instruments by the average person health of either persons engaged in or without instruments by the average person beyond any lot line of the lot containing related to the use of the lot,or persons while on the lot containing such uses. such uses. residing,working,visiting,or recreating in neighboring areas;(b)substantially and adversely affect the maintenance of property in nearby areas;(c)are disruptive of industrial processes carried on in other parts of the industrial area.Where a use occupies a lot abutting or separated by a street lot with designated Class A or B,the A or B performance standard for particulate matter and air contaminants shall apply at the common or facing lot line. Odor All uses shall be operated so as not to All uses shall be operated so as not to All uses shall be operated so as not to emit matter causing unpleasant odors that emit matter causing unpleasant odors that emit matter causing unpleasant odors that are perceptible to the average person are perceptible to the average person are perceptible to the average person while within or beyond the lot containing beyond any lot line of the lot containing beyond any lot line of the lot containing such uses. such uses. such uses. Humidity,Heat,and Glare All uses shall be operated so as not to All uses shall be operated so as not to All uses shall be operated so as not to produce humidity,heat,glare,or high- produce humidity,heat,glare,or high- produce humidity,heat,glare,or high- intensity illumination that is perceptible intensity illumination that is perceptible intensity illumination that is perceptible without instruments by the average person without instruments by the average person without instruments by the average person while on or beyond the lot containing such beyond the lot line of any lot containing while on any lot zoned for residential use. such use. purposes or any industrial property with a Class A or B performance standard designation. PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 Chapter 17.76 ALTERNATIVE ENERGY SYSTEMS AND FACILITIES Sections: 17.76.010 Purpose and applicability. 17.76.020 Development criteria for solar systems. 17.76.030 Development standards for wind energy systems. 17.76.010 Purpose and applicability. This chapter sets forth provisions for the development of alternative energy systems to protect public health and safety while supporting efforts to develop small-scale, distributed energy generation to reduce the amount of electricity drawn from the regional power grid. (Code 1980, § 17.76.010; Ord. No. 855, §4, 2012; Ord. No. 858 §4, 2013) 17.76.020 Development criteria for solar systems. A. All new residential development projects, except condominium conversions, shall provide for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities (lot size and configuration permitting orientation of a structure in an east-west alignment for southern exposure or lot size and configuration permitting orientation of a structure to take advantage of shade or prevailing breezes). 1. Consideration shall be given to local climate, to contour, to lot configuration, and to other design and improvement requirements. 2. Consideration shall be given to provide the long axis of the majority of individual lots shall be within 22.5 degrees east or west of true south for adequate exposure for solar energy systems. B. In the Neo-Industrial (NI) and Industrial Employment OE) Zoning Districts a solar collector system must be provided on all new industrial developments. Solar collectors must cover a minimum of 75 percent of the roof area of all buildings and structures and be designed to be within 22.5 degrees east of west of true south to ensure maximum efficiency for the solar energy system. Solar collectors may be installed on support structures that provide shade over parking areas to achieve minimum coverage requirements (See section 17.56.060.N.1.b (Exceptions for solar collectors)). C. No person shall allow a tree or shrub to be placed or grown so as to cast a shadow greater than ten percent of the collector absorption area upon that solar collector surface on the property of another at any one time between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 2:00 p.m., provided that this section shall not apply to specific trees and shrubs which at the time of installation of a solar collector or during the remainder of that annual solar cycle cast a shadow upon that solar collector. D. The location of a solar collector is required to comply with the local building and setback regulations and to be set back not less than five feet from the property line or any easement that is adjacent to the property line. E. Developers of all new residential subdivisions shall dedicate easements for the purpose of assuring that each lot or dwelling unit shall have the right to receive sunlight across adjacent lots or units for use of a solar energy system. The easements may be contained in a declaration of restrictions for the subdivision, which shall be recorded concurrently with recordation of the final map or issuance of permits, whichever shall first occur. The easements shall prohibit the casting of shadows by vegetation, structures, fixture, or any other object, except for utility wires and similar objects. 1 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 FIGURE 17.76.020-1 SOLAR ACCESS ff - N R , No tree or shrub shall be placed or grown so as to \ cast a shadow greater than 10 percent of the collector absorption area upon that solar collector \ surface on the property of another at any one time between the hours of 10 a.m.and 2 p.m. FIGURE 17.76.020-2 SOLAR ORIENTATION N E3 F 1 5 (Code 1980, § 17.76.020; Ord. No. 855, §4, 2012) 2 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 17.76.030 Development standards for wind energy systems. A. General development standards. 1. Siting. Wind energy systems are prohibited on ridgelines. 2. Setbacks. All wind energy systems shall comply with existing setbacks for the zone in which it is located as well as any fire code setback requirements. 3. Color. Structural components including, but not limited to, towers and blades shall be of a nonreflective, unobtrusive color. 4. Guy wires. The use of guy wires is prohibited. Towers shall be self-supporting. 5. Utility connections. For interconnected systems, no wind energy system shall be installed until evidence has been notified and indicated that the proposed interconnection is acceptable. On- site electrical wires associated with the system shall be installed underground, except for "tie- ins" to the electric utility service provider and its transmission poles, towers and lines. 6. Exterior lighting. Exterior lighting on any wind energy system shall be prohibited unless specifically required by the Federal Aviation Administration. 7. Signs. No advertising sign or logo shall be placed or painted on any wind energy system, including towers and blades. 8. Noise. All wind energy systems are subject to noise standards as outlined in section 17.66.050 (Noise Standards). 9. Rotor safety. All wind energy systems must be equipped with manual and automatic over-speed controls to limit the rotational speed of the blades within the design limits of the rotor. 10. Electromagnetic interference.All wind energy systems shall be designed, installed and operated so that no distributing electromagnetic interference is caused. Disruptive interference from the facility shall be promptly rectified to include the discontinued operation of the wind energy system. 11. FAA regulations. All wind energy systems shall comply with applicable FAA regulations, including any necessary approvals for installations to close to airports. B. Residential site development standards. 1. Height. The maximum height for a small wind energy system is limited as follows: i. Freestanding systems shall not exceed 40 feet in height above grade level. ii. Roof-mounted systems shall not exceed 15 feet in height above the structure on which the system is mounted. 2. Number of systems. The maximum number of wind energy systems is limited as follows: i. Freestanding systems: One per parcel. ii. Roof-mounted systems: Two per parcel. C. Industrial site development standards. 1. Height. The maximum height for a small wind energy system is limited as follows: i. Freestanding systems shall not exceed 80100 feet above grade level measured from finished grade to the center of the turbine hub. ii. Roof-mounted systems shall not exceed 4525 feet in height measured from the center of the turbine hub to the roof surface above the structure on which the system is mounted. 2. Number of systems. The maximum number of wind energy systems is limited as follows: i. Freestanding systems: Two per parcel. ii. Roof-mounted systems: Four per parcel. 3. Tower access. Towers must provide one of the following: 3 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 i. Tower climbing apparatus located no closer than 12 feet from the ground; ii. Have an anti-climb device installed on the tower; iii. Provide a tower-access limitation program approved by the reviewing authority. D. Abandoned wind energy systems. Any wind energy system that is not used for a consecutive 12- month period shall be deemed abandoned. The property owner or permittee shall remove the wind energy system, clear the site of all equipment and restore the site as nearly as practicable to the condition prior to the installation of the wind energy system. 4 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 2021 ARTICLE Vill. GLOSSARY Chapter 17.126 UNIVERSAL DEFINITIONS 17.126.010 Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to provide definitions for unique terms used throughout this title that are general in nature. (Code 1980, § 17.126.010; Ord. No. 855, §4, 2012) 17.126.020 Universal definitions. Parkinq StudV describes a report prepared bV a qualified traffic/parking engineer for review and acceptance bV the director of engineering services/city engineer and planning director that analyzes the amount of parking proposed for a site relative to the parking demand generated by a proposed use(s). The report may include calculations and recommendations for reducing the number of parking spaces for a proposed use(s) and an analysis of shared on-site parking. The report may include parking counts of vehicles parked in an area during selected days and times to evaluate the ratio of available parking spaces to the number of vehicles parked . A parking study may also provide details on any recommended transportation demand management measures. 1