HomeMy WebLinkAbout2021/05/19 - Regular Meeting Agenda PacketCITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
L. Dor
ennis Michael REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
Mayor Pro Tem May 19, 2021
Lynne B. Kennedy 10500 Civic Center Drive
MemberCouncils of the City Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Ryan A. Hutchison
Kristine D. Scott
Sam Spagnolo FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARD —CITY COUNCIL
HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY- SUCCESSOR AGENCY —
PUBLIC FINANCE AUTHORITY
CLOSED SESSION TRI-COMMUNITIES ROOM 4:30 P.M.
REGULAR MEETINGS COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 P.M.
The City Council meets regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in the Council
Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive. It Is the Intent to conclude the meeting by 10:00 p.m. unless
extended by the concurrence of the City Council. Agendas, minutes, and recordings of meetings can be
found at www.cityofrc.us or by contacting the City Clerk's Office at 909-774-2023.
Live Broadcast available on Channel 3 (RCTV-3).
In response to the Governor's Executive Orders, the San Bernardino County Department of Public Health
requirements, and to ensure the health and safety of our residents by limiting contact that could spread the
COVID-19 virus, there will be no members of the public in attendance at the City Council/Fire District Meetings.
Members of the City Council/Fire District and staff may participate in this meeting via a teleconference. In place
of in -,person attendance, members of the public are encouraged to watch from the safety of their homes in one
of the following ways:
Live Streaming on the City's website at
https://www.cityofrc.us/your-government/city-council-agendas or
Local Cable: RCTV3 Programming
Members of the public wishing to speak during public communication may call at the start of the meeting by
dialing (909)774-2751, if speaking on a Public Hearing item, please dial in when the Public Hearing is being
heard at (909)774-2751 to be added to the queue for public comment. Calls will be answered in the order
received.
The City of Rancho Cucamonga thanks you in advance for taking all precautions to prevent spreading the
COVID-19 virus.
If you are an individual with a disability and need a reasonable modification or accommodation pursuant to the
Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA"), please contact the City Clerk's Office at (909) 774-2023, 24 hours prior to
the meeting so that the City can make reasonable arrangements.
CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT Page 1
"Our Vision is to build on our success as a world class community to create
an equitable sustainable and vibrant city rich in opportunity for all to thrive. "
CLOSED SESSION - 4:30 P.M.
TRI-COMMUNITIES ROOM
ROLL CALL: Mayor Michael
Mayor Pro Tern Kennedy
Council Members Hutchison, Scott, and Spagnolo
A. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)
B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)
D. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION
D1. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR ROBERT NEIUBER, HUMAN RESOURCES
DIRECTOR PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54954.2 REGARDING LABOR
NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION
(RCCEA) — (CITY)
D2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO
PARAGRAPH (1) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9-1 NAME OF CASE: HIMNEL
USA, INC. d/b/a ST. MARY'S MONTESSORI SCHOOL AND GLOBAL PROPERTY HOLDINGS
LLC VS. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, SBSC CASE NO.: CIVDS 2014554. — (CITY)
D3. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO
PARAGRAPH (1) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA V. DR LANDMARK, INC.; POWER MEDIC TECHNOLOGIES, INC.;
HOFER PROPERTIES, LLC; AND DOES 1 THROUGH 5 INCLUSIVE, SBSC CASE NO.:
CIVDS 1904713 — (CITY)
D4. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO
PARAGRAPH (1) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: PEPE'S
INC. V. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, CENTRAL
DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, CASE NO. 5:20CV02506JGBSP — (CITY)
D5. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE
SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTIES LOCATED AT: 7089 ETIWANDA AVE. (APN 0227-
12156); HAVEN AVE. (APN:020833147); HAVEN AVE. (APN:020833140); 8340 UTICA AVE.
(APN:0208 353 06); 9612 SAN BERNARDINO ROAD (APN:0208 131 83); 9547 SAN
BERNARDINO ROAD (APN:020815107); 9561 SAN BERNARDINO ROAD (APN: 0208 151-
17); NEGOTIATING PARTIES JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER AND LORI SASSOON,
DEPUTY CITY MANAGER REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; AND
VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA OF LOS ANGELES (VOALA), REGARDING PRICE AND
TERMS. — (CITY/FIRE)
CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT Page 2
"Our Vision is to build on our success as a world class community, to create
an equitable, sustainable, and vibrant city, rich in opportunity for all to thrive. "
D6. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION: INITIATION OF
LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF GOVERNMENT
CODE SECTION 54956.9: (1 CASE) - CITY
D7. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE
SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8408 ROCHESTER AVENUE, RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CA (THE EPICENTER ENTERTAINMENT & ADULT SPORTS COMPLEX);
NEGOTIATING PARTIES: JOHN GILLISION, WILLIAM WITTKOPF, JENNIFER HUNT GRACIA,
REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND REYNOLDS SPORTS
MANAGEMENT; REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS - (CITY)
C. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS
E. RECESS — Closed Session to Recess to the Regular City Council Meeting at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers at
City Hall, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California.
CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT Page 3
"Our Vision is to build on our success as a world class community, to create
an equitable, sustainable, and vibrant city, rich in opportunity for all to thrive. "
REGULAR MEETING - 7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL: Mayor Michael
Mayor Pro Tern Kennedy
Council Members Hutchison, Scott, and Spagnolo
A. AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDA
B. ANNOUNCEMENT I PRESENTATIONS
B1. Presentation of a Proclamation Declaring the Month of May 2021, as Mental Health Awareness
Month.
B2. Presentation of a Proclamation Celebrating Professional Municipal Clerks Week and
Recognition of Jasmin Oriel for Receiving the Certified Municipal Clerk (CMC) Designation
from the International Institute of Municipal Clerks.
B3. Presentation of Certificate of Sympathy in Honor of Patricia Morris, Longtime Community
Member and Previous Parks and Recreation Commissioner.
C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
Members of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, and
Public Finance Authority. This is the time and place for the general public to address the Fire Protection
District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Council on
any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Fire Protection District, Housing Successor
Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Council from addressing any issue not previously
included on the Agenda. The Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing
Authority Board, and City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting.
Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Mayor,
depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to the
Fire Board, Agencies, Successor Agency, Authority Board, or City Council not to the members of the audience. This is a
professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience
and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting.
The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of the business
portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topic contained in the business
portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for these business items (with the exception of
public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of the agenda commences. Any other public
communications which have not concluded during this one hour period may resume after the regular business portion of
the agenda has been completed.
CONSENT CALENDARS:
CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT Page 4
'Our Vision is to build on oursuccess as a world Gass community to create
an equitable sustainable and vibrant city rich in opportunity for all to thrive.'
The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and noncontroversial. They will be acted upon at
one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Council Member for discussion. Members of the City
Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, and Public Finance Authority.
Council is acting in all capacities with respect to its actions on the Consent Calendars.
D. CONSENT CALENDAR -
8
D1.
Consideration of Meeting Minutes for the Regular and Special Meetings of April 21, 2021.
D2.
Consideration to Receive and File Current Investment Schedule as of April 30, 2021 for the City
18
of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. (CITY/FIRE)
D3.
Consideration to Approve the First Amendment to the Memorandum of Understanding for
51
Cooperative Planning and Development of the San Sevaine Trail in San Bernardino County.
(CITY)
D4.
Consideration of Memorandum's of Understanding (MOU's) between the Alta Loma, Central
63
and Etiwanda School Districts and the City to Establish Cost -Sharing for the Provision of
Crossing Guard Services. (CITY)
D5.
Consideration to Accept as Complete, File the Notice of Completion and Authorize Release of
80
Retention and Bonds for the Tract 18960 Altura Drive, Tejas Court and Wilson Avenue
Miscellaneous Asphalt and Concrete Repairs Project. (CITY)
D6.
Consideration to Accept the Citywide Concrete Repair — FY 2019/2020 Project as Complete,
83
File the Notice of Completion, and Authorize Release of Retention and Bonds. (CITY)
D7.
Consideration to Accept as Complete, File a Notice of Completion, and Authorize Release of
86
Retention, and Bonds for the Vineyard Avenue at San Bernardino Road Traffic Signal
Modification Project. (CITY)
D8.
Consideration of Amendment No.1 to the Construction and Maintenance Agreement for
90
Hellman Avenue. (CITY)
D9.
Consideration to Approve the Use of Midwest Tape to Provide Digital Media Content to the
97
Rancho Cucamonga Public Library Using the Hoopla Platform. (CITY)
DI O.Consideration to Award Contract to Southern California Sound Image for the "Central Park AN
99
Update Project" and to Approve Change Order 001 for the Council Chambers A/V Refresh.
(CITY)
E. CONSENT CALENDAR ORDINANCE(S) - SECOND READING/ADOPTION
F. ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING ITEM(S)
CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT Page 5
'Our Vision is to build on oursuccess as a world Gass community to create
an equitable sustainable and vibrant city rich in opportunity for all to thrive.'
G. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM(S) - CITYIFIRE DISTRICT
G1. Public Hearing to Consider a Resolution for Placement of Special Assessments and Liens for 101
Delinquent Solid Waste Accounts. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021-040) (CITY)
G2. Public Hearing to Consider a Resolution Approving the List of Properties with Nuisance 126
Abatements and Authorizing the Placement of a Special Assessment. (RESOLUTION NO.
2021-039)(CITY)
H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORT(S)
H1. Consideration Whether to Appeal the Action of the Planning Commission in Approving 131
Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20164, Minor Design Review DRC2020-001381 and
Conditional Use Permit DRC2020-00087. (CITY)
I. COUNCIL BUSINESS
11. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS ---
(Comments to be limited to three minutes per Council Member.)
12. INTERAGENCY UPDATES
(Update by the City Council to the community on the meetings that were attended.)
J. CITY ATTORNEY ITEMS:
K. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
L. ADJOURNMENT
Adjournment in Memory of Patricia Morris, Longtime Community Member and Previous Parks and
Recreation Commissioner.
CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT Page 6
"Our Vision is to build on our success as a world class community to create
an equitable sustainable and vibrant city rich in opportunity for all to thrive."
CERTIFICATION
I, Linda A. Troyan, MMC, City Clerk Services Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby
certify under penalty of perjury that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on at least
Seventy -Two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive,
Rancho Cucamonga, California and on the City's website.
LINDA A. TROYAN, MMC
CITY CLERK SERVICES DIRECTOR
If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City
Clerk's office at (909) 477-2700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make
reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired.
CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT Page 7
"Our Vision is to build on our success as a world class community to create
an equitable sustainable and vibrant city rich in opportunity for all to thrive. "
►IT
ID
RS
Thank you to our community partners
serve and help us make
10
t��R
A PjW: Etly
KAISER PERMANENTEo Inland Empire Health Plan
nnmi
National Alliance on Mental Illness
�J Chaffey College
`t`0*, SURy�VO9
ce6w
Behavioral Health
Y
SERVICES
MENTAL
mhsHEALTH
SYSTEMS
CIA 19
South Coast
Royer Studios
an impact
San Bernardino
o
County
Superintendent of
Schools
Tea ae;anare, county suaennlenaent
WHOLISTIC
�qyr
theTRAUMAMEALING HEALTH
FOUNDATION COLLABORATIVE
i
I
er
4mn 4.�i
g rem
G nA`
8
The City of Rancho Cucamonga and the
�T
National Alliance of Meri Ainess (NAM!) invite you to
Virtual Communitv Check -ins
Monday September 14th 6:00-7:30 p.m.
Pour
RSVP at: https://bit.ly/RC-Checkin
yourself
Feel connected to your community
some tea,
through monthly virtual check -in
conversations. This is an opportunity
put on your
for community members to share their
fuzzy
�!EM own experiences and feel welcomed
slippers,
in a judgement -free environment
I�
where you can feel supported.
and get
comfortable
• benefit from community wisdom
Be prepared to learn from each other
at home.
• Hear from experts on a wellness topic you want to
�
learn more about
■ Find tools, resources, and ,trotegiss to practice
self -core and wellness
[
'This is an informative event that does not conslitute a ttharopist- client relationship This a
not a substitute for professional diagnosis or trealmeril From o mentc heo@h professipnot
A& 1
u sLuii � _ t JA
tin 001
7
jA
A11L-,l`Ayr
W,-vl
I
.�
♦1y O
3 r Haj, Amalie
1j -P IRI
t
TEEN WELLNESS WORKSHOP
Cupid's Guide to
Self Love
Leorn how to 6. dd resiliency and ca nnec:
wrh of ho, s•o�s
.if_, self core and se11 love.
FEBRUARY IOTH . 3:30 - S PM
RSVP: 611p://6H.ly/eulde9.elFleva
` . , lumma
or I
RSVP AT NTTP://61T.LY/TEENSAFETY2020
f
EA
FREE
L TEEN SUMMIT
YOUR a£ST SELF
3ULD WELLNESS SREAICOLFT SESSIONS13ul
7ESILIENCE
--
,
tofA,AU TY
YOlJ,7 FlJTVdELD
fr
t3
"REPRESENTATION MATTERS" PANEL
r•, d •«l..c. wi � •o• • dawn w^.I Ar-E km e o-Mw
n �+ •„� ate.
. e•� LIF-
y,L
4
Fa rs"t
s
atun
HOW SOCIAL MEDIA CAN ► •M
YOU III -ULM - •'
[Fi
A4. �� ....� r.... �..-,.,,
M..PIR
A
M.e.n Urquidi 1�� AsM.Y McG.w.n
T_OULD
f
S /A
• ► FREE
SELFICARE
! i� I
EveAazz�
ry Wednesday 12/2, 12/9, 12/16
5:00 pm - 6:30 pm I Virtuo[ through
0
ww-
Resources PP
SBSAS.org ik, 40—.Mal
Thehotline-crg
Loveisrespect-org
51Qvelarrguages-cum
Ap =.P.
0
1212 Building Ennoti—IIn1at1igenCO
1219 HSnithy RelOtionshipc i ■ IN ' ■ COMMUNITY COPING AND
12116 Ma king tiniB for Yoal Point Night ACtirity!
DISCUSS I 1 CULTIVATE TOOLS
IiWRA{.CHO L`�N41NU RSYF at IF
Ill R OY2c0 HATLESS hops:Ilhit.ly/deoemberselfea,e ` t R AND
c
_rr�rr �
1 A
_ - .a.
of tv axpel:f7 I
Leorn to love yourself
I and build resiliency
-Listen to youth stories I Suhslonce Use Crisis! Frida's Story
ahout [hair mantel health
I journeys I I �V Owl/ � f. c
-Be in community and find I
4 AIR
o sofa space to folk with
other teens in the city
fi Thanli you to our partners i ..:. n „t 4
i�. `-==� = __ fin• r.. ,
-mot
VIRTUAL ON WEDNESDAYS 5:DD-6:3D PM
STARTING 3 f 31, AJ7, 4 j14,%21 - R• R r
lV�ARCH 51ST
ULTIVATING RESILIENCE
I APRIL 7TH RESS MANAGEMENT
RIL 14TH ff SELF -- CARE AND COPING
WITH CAREGIVING
21ST rV� HEALTHY BOUNDARIES Id
r
I
r�
In honor of May as Mental Health
Awareness Month and National Physical
Fitness & Sports Month, the City of
WK;V Rancho Cucamonga invites you to our
May Healthy hind & Body Series!
MA-'7 W low, 'B
IERS
RSVP: http: /bit.ly mindbody r
Learn resources on hove to
incorporate a holistic lifestyle.
• Gain an understanding of the
benefits of making healthy behavior
changes in your life.
Discuss barriers or challenges
alongside a supportive community.
• Spanish Translation available.
*Each workshop is a
stand alone.
In partnership with:
1
llHOLISTIC
HEALTH
CQLLABQRATIVE
12 Workshop #1
Stress & Emotional Eating PF
•oo--oo P1
5/19 Workshop #2
Managing Diet & Lifst
5:00-6:00 PM
ZZz
5/26 Workshop #
Mindfulness & Sleep
5:00-6:00 P1
L
Chaffey Joint Union High School District
Community Service Recognition
Communitv Service Award
PRESENTATION OF A PROCLAMATION CELEBRATING PROFESSIONAL
MUNICIPAL CLERKS WEEK
RECOGNITION OF JASMIN ORIEL FOR RECEIVING THE CERTIFIED MUNICIPAL
CLERK (CIVIC) DESIGNATION FROM THE INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF
MUNICIPAL CLERKS.
RANCHO
CUCAMONGA
All-AMeriCa Civ
la1►'I11
0
RANCHO
CUCAMONGA
All -America City
1 I
20*20
^•
Janice C. Reynolds
Elected City Clerk
It, AWW
Kimberly Solorio
Records Management
Analyst
Linda A. Troyan Patricia Bravo -Valdez
City Clerk Services Deputy Director of City Clerk
Director Services
Jasmin Oriel
Executive Assistant
Daniela Rodriguez
Administrative Assistants!k'
aI
:.t
4L
1 �
pNo`O s4111
t ..
IIMC Certification
Certified Municipal Clerk Designation (CIVIC)
Celebrating the 52nd
Annual Professional
Municipal Clerks Week
Initiated in 1969 by IIMC and
endorsed by all of its
members throughout the
United States, Canada and 15
other countries, the week is a
time of celebration and
reflection on the importance
of the Clerk's office
In 1984, President Ronald
Reagan signed a proclamation
that officially declared
Municipal Clerks Week the
first full week of May.
Pro ess C.i�turxrc �a
Cfe-rfis 'h'e . k
M wy 2-Ir 8, 20.2Y
April 21, 2021
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES
The City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council held a Special Meeting on Wednesday, April 21, 2021, in the
Council Chambers at City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Mayor
Michael called the meeting to order at 4:00 p.m.
Present were Councilmembers Ryan Hutchison, Kristine Scott, Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tern Lynne Kennedy,
and Mayor L. Dennis Michael.
Also present were: John Gillison, City Manager; Nicholas Ghirelli, Assistant City Attorney; Elisa Cox, Deputy
City Manager/Civic and Cultural Services; Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services; Matt
Burris, Deputy City Manager/Community and Economic Development; and Linda A. Troyan, City Clerk Services
Director.
Council Member Spagnolo led the pledge of allegiance.
Responding to the spread of the Coronavirus (COVID-19) and social distancing requirements, City Manager
Gillison announced that due to recent changes in the Governor's Executive Orders, the San Bernardino County
Department of Public Health requirements, and to ensure the health and safety of Rancho Cucamonga residents
by limiting contact that could spread the COVID-19 virus, there will be no members of the public in attendance
at the Special City Council Meeting and in place of in -person attendance, members of the public are encouraged
to watch from the safety of their homes live from the City's website or on RCTV-3.
He stated members of the public wishing to speak during public communication will need to dial in to
(909)774-2751 to be added to the queue for comment. Additional information on the Coronavirus pandemic and
City resources and updates can be found at www.cityofrc.us/coronavirus.
B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
Via phone call, Richard Finkel of Bundy -Finkel Architects and Romeo Samouh, spoke in opposition of item C1
an interim Urgency Ordinance establishing a moratorium on new service stations. Their application for a service
station is currently under review with the City and the proposed moratorium would stop their project. The City
Council was provided with a map received from Mr. Finkel and Mr. Samouh.
The City Council was provided with correspondence received from Dan Titus, in opposition of Ordinance No
980 and correspondence received from Jaime DeMarco, in support of Ordinance No. 980.
C. ITEMS OF DISCUSSION
C1. Discussion of Service Stations in Rancho Cucamonga and Consideration of Urgency Zoning Ordinance
No. 980, to Establish an Interim Urgency Zoning Ordinance to Establish a Moratorium for a Period of 45
Days on the Approval of Building Permits or Other Entitlements for New Service Station Uses or the
Expansion of Existing Service Station Uses. (URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. 980) (CITY)
City Manager Gillison along with Deputy City Manager Burris and Planning Director McIntosh, reviewed the
background on Service Stations and discussed the following: recent increase in the number of applications for
service station uses; recent increase in the number of requests to add alcohol sales to existing service stations;
noticeable concentration of service station requests in Cucamonga Neighborhood; concerns with long-term
impacts on land use, the environment, and economic development; concerns with benefits of service stations
versus potential impacts to neighborhoods and informed that there are four (4) applications for service stations
currently under review. City Manager Gillison noted that with direction received from the City Council, staff
conducted an analysis on service stations in the City. Staff presented the analysis findings via PowerPoint.
Council discussion ensued concerning the scope, benefits and impacts of the proposed Moratorium, renewed
interest in the Service Station business sector, performance standards for the future, alignment with the City's
Economic Development Plan, Public Safety cost analysis, project developers looking to provide ride sharing
April 21, 2021 City Council Special Meeting Minutes
City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 1 of 1 Page 8
amenities in the future, diversity of businesses in the City, exemption of existing applicants, citywide geographical
impact and the duration of proposed Moratorium. Council directed Staff to look into the status of the four (4)
applications for service stations currently under review prior to the consideration of Urgency Zoning Ordinance
No. 980 at the 7:00 p.m. Regular City Council meeting.
D. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Michael adjourned the meeting at 5:15 p.m.
Approved:
Respectfully submitted,
Linda A. Troyan, MMC
City Clerk Services Director
April 21, 2021 City Council Special Meeting Minutes
City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 2 of 1 Page 9
April 21, 2021
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY, SUCCESSOR AGENCY,
PUBLIC FINANCE AUTHORITY AND CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETINGS MINUTES
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a closed session on Wednesday, April 21, 2021, in the
Tri-Communities Conference Room at the Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga,
California. Mayor Michael called the meeting to order at 5:20 p.m.
Present were Council Members: Ryan Hutchison, Kristine Scott, Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tern Lynne Kennedy
and Mayor L. Dennis Michael.
Also present were: John Gillison, City Manager; Nicholas Ghirelli, Assistant City Attorney; Lori Sassoon, Deputy
City Manager/Administrative Services; Elisa Cox, Deputy City Manager/Cultural & Civic Services and Matt Burris,
Deputy City Manager/Economic and Community Development.
A. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)
B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)
No public communications were made.
C. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS
None.
D. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION
D1. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR ROBERT NEIUBER, HUMAN RESOURCES
DIRECTOR PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54954.2 REGARDING LABOR NEGOTIATIONS
WITH THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION (RCCEA), RANCHO
CUCAMONGA MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION AND FIRE SUPPORT SERVICES — (CITY)
D2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH
(1) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: HIMNEL USA, INC. d/b/a ST.
MARY'S MONTESSORI SCHOOL AND GLOBAL PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLC VS. CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, SBSC CASE NO.: CIVDS 2014554. — (CITY)
D3. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH
(1) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA V. DR LANDMARK, INC.; POWER MEDIC TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; HOFER
PROPERTIES, LLC; AND DOES 1 THROUGH 5 INCLUSIVE, SBSC CASE NO.: CIVDS 1904713 —
(CITY)
D4. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH
(1) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: PEPE'S INC. V. CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, CENTRAL DISTRICT OF
CALIFORNIA, CASE NO. 5:20CV02506JGBSP — (CITY)
April 21, 2021 1 Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency,
Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes
City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 1 of 8
Page 10
D5. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION
54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 12467 BASELINE ROAD IDENTIFIED AS PARCEL
NUMBERS 1090331030000, 1090331040000, 1089581040000; NEGOTIATING PARTIES JOHN
GILLISON, CITY MANAGER REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND
JOSEPH FILIPPI, JOSEPH FILIPPI WINERY AND VINEYARDS; REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS.
— (CITY)
D6. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION
54956.8 REGARDING THE FOLLOWING REAL PROPERTY: (1) REAL PROPERTY OWNED BY
THM ENTERPRISES, LLC AND LOCATED AT 12449 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD IN THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229 031 41. NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY
MANAGER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS
TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE
PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. — (CITY)
D7. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION
54956.8 REGARDING THE FOLLOWING REAL PROPERTY:(1) REAL PROPERTY OWNED BY
WALMART REAL ESTATE BUSINESS TRUST AND LOCATED AT 12549 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD
IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO
COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 022903238 & 44. NEGOTIATING PARTIES,
JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING
PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. — (CITY)
D8. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION
54956.8 FOR PROPERTIES LOCATED AT: 7089 ETIWANDA AVE. (APN 0227- 121-56); HAVEN
AVE. (APN:0208331-47); HAVEN AVE. (APN:0208-331-40); 8340 UTICA AVE. (APN:0208-353-06);
9612 SAN BERNARDINO ROAD (APN:0208-131-83); 9547 SAN BERNARDINO ROAD
(APN:0208-151-07); 9561 SAN BERNARDINO ROAD (APN: 0208- 151-17); NEGOTIATING
PARTIES JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER AND LORI SASSOON, DEPUTY CITY MANAGER
REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; AND VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA OF
LOS ANGELES (VOALA), REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS. — (CITY/FIRE)
D9. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT
CODE SECTION 54956.9(A) - SOUTHWEST VOTER REGISTRATION EDUCATION PROJECT V.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; CASE NO. CIVRS 1603632.- (CITY)
D10. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION
54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8408 ROCHESTER AVENUE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CA (THE EPICENTER ENTERTAINMENT & ADULT SPORTS COMPLEX); NEGOTIATING
PARTIES: JOHN GILLISON, JENNIFER HUNT-GRACIA AND WILLIAM WITTKOPF,
REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND MOSHSIN MALIK, ZT BASEBALL;
REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS — (CITY)
D11. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION
54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHERLY TERMINUS OF LAYTON
STREET SOUTH OF LA MESA DRIVE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA; NEGOTIATING PARTIES JOHN
GILLISON, CITY MANAGER REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REGARDING
INSTRUCTIONS FOR NEGOTIATING THE PRICE, TERMS OF PAYMENT, OR BOTH — (CITY)
D12. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL -ANTICIPATED LITIGATION: INITIATION OF LITIGATION
PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION
54956.9: (1 CASE) — (CITY)
E. RECESS The closed session recessed at 6:55 p.m.
April 21, 2021 1 Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency,
Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes
City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 2 of 8
Page 11
REGULAR MEETING - 7:00 p.m.
CALL TO ORDER - COUNCIL CHAMBERS
The regular meetings of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor
Agency, Public Finance Authority and the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council were held on April 21, 2021 in
the Council Chambers at City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Mayor
Michael called the meeting to order at 7:01 p.m.
Present were Council Members: Ryan Hutchison, Kristine Scott, Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tern Lynne Kennedy
and Mayor L. Dennis Michael.
Also present were: John Gillison, City Manager; Nicholals Ghirelli, Assistant City Attorney and Linda A. Troyan,
MMC, Director of City Clerk Services.
Council Member Hutchison led the Pledge of Allegiance.
Responding to the spread of the Coronavirus (COVID-19) and social distancing requirements, City Manager Gillison
announced that due to recent changes in the Governor's Executive Orders, the San Bernardino County Department
of Public Health requirements, and to ensure the health and safety of Rancho Cucamonga residents by limiting
contact that could spread the COVID-19 virus, there will be no members of the public in attendance at the City
Council/Fire District Meetings and in place of in -person attendance, members of the public are encouraged to watch
from the safety of their homes live from the City's website or on RCTV-3.
He stated members of the public wishing to speak during public communication or on a public hearing item will need
to dial in to (909)774-2751 to be added to the queue for comment. Additional information on the Coronavirus
pandemic and City resources and updates can be found at www.cityofrc.us/coronavirus.
A. AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDA
None.
B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS
Mayor Michael announced that item B2 would be heard first, followed by item B1
B2. Presentation on the California Low -Cost Auto Insurance Program by Peter Meza, Department of
Insurance, State of California.
Via video presentation Peter Meza, Department of Insurance, State of California, showcased the California
Low -Cost Auto Insurance Program and details on how to sign up for the program.
B1. Welcome and Updates by Senator Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh, California State Senate 23rd District.
Via teleconference Senator Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh, California State Senate 23rd District. Senator Ochoa Bogh
shared legislative updates and congratulated the City of Rancho Cucamonga on receiving the "All -America City"
designation by the National Civic League.
April 21, 2021 1 Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency,
Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes
City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 3 of 8
Page 12
C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
Mayor Michael announced, due to COVID-19 and social distancing requirements, the Public Communications portion
of the meeting will be conducted telephonically.
City Clerk Services Director Troyan announced that an email was received by Gary Fernandes regarding a complaint
and that a copy would be provided to the City Council and City Manager.
Via phone call, Janet Walton, offered a prayer.
Via phone call, Grant Ross, spoke in opposition of item H2 and the impact of the moratorium on his proposed 7-
Eleven Service Station project on Archibald Avenue.
D. CONSENT CALENDAR
D1. Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Bi-Weekly Payroll in the Total Amount of $2,052,851.01
and City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers(Excluding Checks Issued to Southern California
Gas Company in the Total Amount of $6,326,187.32 Dated March 29, 2021 Through April 11, 2021.
(CITY/FIRE)
D2. Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers for Checks Issued to Southern
California Gas Company in the Total Amount of $23,354.92 Dated March 29, 2021 Through April 11,
2021. (CITY/FIRE)
D3. Consideration to Receive and File Current Investment Schedules as of March 31, 2021 for the City of
Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. (FIRE/CITY COUNCIL)
D4. Consideration of Amendment No. 3 to the Professional Services Agreement with Inland Empire
Property Services for Weed and Fire Hazard Abatement Services in the Amount of $30,000, Increase
the Contract Term from Five Years to Seven Years, and Authorization of an Appropriation in the
Amount of $30,000. (FIRE)
D5. Consideration to Order the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Light
Maintenance Districts No's. 1 and 2 Related to Case No. PMT2020-05213, Located at 6057 Burgundy
Avenue. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021-023) (RESOLUTION NO. 2021-024) (RESOLUTION NO.
2021-025) (CITY)
D6. Consideration of a Resolution Adopting a Salary Schedule for the Rancho Cucamonga Management
Association and Approving Changes to the Rancho Cucamonga City Employee Association and Part
Time City Positions Salary Schedule for Fiscal Year 2020-21. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021-026) (CITY)
D7. Consideration to Order the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Light
Maintenance Districts No's. 1 and 2 Related to Case No. PMT2020-03289, Located at 9030 Whirlaway
Court. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021-027), (RESOLUTION NO. 2021-028) AND (RESOLUTION NO.
2021-029) (CITY)
D8. Consideration to Order the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Light
Maintenance Districts No's. 1 and 2 Related to Case No. PMT2020-04586, Located at 10943
Beechwood Drive. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021-030), (RESOLUTION NO. 2021-031) AND
(RESOLUTION NO. 2021-032) (CITY)
D9. Consideration to Accept Public Improvements for the Traffic Signal Battery Backup System
Replacement FY 19-20 as Complete, file a Notice of Completion, and Authorize Release of Retention
and Bonds. (CITY)
April 21, 2021 1 Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency,
Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes
City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 4 of 8
Page 13
D10. Consideration to Approve and Execute a Purchase and Sale Agreement Between the City of Rancho
Cucamonga and Core5 Industrial Partners, LLC for Property Commonly Known as APN
0229-021-97-0000 Generally Located at the North East Corner of Arrow Route and Rochester Avenue.
(CITY)
MOTION: Moved by Mayor Pro Tern Kennedy, seconded by Council Member Hutchison, to approve Consent
Calendar Items D1 through D10 with Council Member Scott abstaining on item D2, due to her employment
with Southern California Gas Company. Motion carried, 5-0.
E. CONSENT CALENDAR ORDINANCE(S) - SECOND READING/ADOPTION
No items.
F. ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING ITEM(S)
No items.
G. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARING ITEM(S) - CITY/FIRE DISTRICT
No items.
H. CITY MANAGERS STAFF REPORT(S)
H1. Consideration of a Resolution Adopting the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility's Updated
Resource Adequacy Program. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021-022) (CITY)
City Manager Gillison introduced Fred Lyn, Deputy Director of Engineering/ Utilities & Environmental Services,
who presented a PowerPoint for Item H1. He informed the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility's Updated
Resource Adequacy Program is a regulatory compliance program developed to ensure that there will be sufficient
physical resources available to serve electric demand under the most extreme conditions. Deputy Director of
Engineering Lyn recommended adoption of Resolution No. 2021-022, adopting the Rancho Cucamonga
Municipal Utility's Updated Resource Adequacy Program.
MOTION: Moved by Council Member Scott, seconded by Council Member Hutchison, to adopt Resolution No.
2021-022, adopting the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility's Updated Resource Adequacy Program. Motion
carried, 5-0.
H2. Introduction and Adoption of Urgency Zoning Ordinance No. 980, to Establish an Interim Urgency
Zoning Ordinance to Establish a Moratorium for a Period of 45 Days on the Approval of Building
Permits or Other Entitlements for New Service Station Uses or the Expansion of Existing Service
Station Uses. (4/5 Vote Required) (CITY) (INTERIM URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. 980)
City Manager Gillison introduced Item H2 and provided a summary of the four applications under the City's review
as discussed at the April 21, 2021 Special Meeting at 4:00 p.m. and recommended that the City Council adopt
Urgency Zoning Ordinance No. 980 with the following proposed revision to Section 4C as follows:
C. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the moratorium established by this Interim Urgency Ordinance shall not apply
to the following:
(1) The improvement, renovation, or demolition of an existing service station, provided that such development
otherwise conforms to applicable law, does not result in an increase to the number of gas pumping facilities, does
not add any new accessory uses on site, and does not require a discretionary entitlement to perform such
improvement, renovation, or demolition; or
(2) An application for a service station that has been deemed complete or received all discretionary entitlements
as of the moratorium's effective date, provided that the City has issued a building permit for construction or
April 21, 2021 1 Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency,
Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes
City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 5 of 8
Page 14
redevelopment of the proposed service station within six months of the moratorium's effective date. The
moratorium shall thereafter apply to these applications if a building permit has not been issued within that six
month period.
Council discussion ensued following the Staff presentation. Council discussed the timeline and possible
extensions of the moratorium and clarified that the moratorium is not intended to stop Service Stations. Discussion
centered on application and building permit process during moratorium, city wide geographical span of
moratorium, downturn in annual sales tax revenue for service stations and the increased interest in the
development of service stations.
MOTION: Moved by Council Member Scott, seconded by Council Member Spagnolo, to adopt Urgency Zoning
Ordinance No. 980 with the proposed revision to Section 4C to include: C. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the
moratorium established by this Interim Urgency Ordinance shall not apply to the following: (1) The improvement,
renovation, or demolition of an existing service station, provided that such development otherwise conforms to
applicable law, does not result in an increase to the number of gas pumping facilities, does not add any new
accessory uses on site, and does not require a discretionary entitlement to perform such improvement, renovation,
or demolition; or (2) An application for a service station that has been deemed complete or received all
discretionary entitlements as of the moratorium's effective date, provided that the City has issued a building permit
for construction or redevelopment of the proposed service station within six months of the moratorium's effective
date. The moratorium shall thereafter apply to these applications if a building permit has not been issued within
that six month period, by title only and waive further reading.
Linda Troyan, City Clerk Services Director read the title of Urgency Zoning Ordinance No. 980
VOTES NOW CAST ON MOTION: Moved by Council Member Scott, seconded by Council Member Spagnolo,
to adopt Urgency Zoning Ordinance No. 980 with the proposed revision to Section 4C to include: C.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the moratorium established by this Interim Urgency Ordinance shall not apply
to the following: (1) The improvement, renovation, or demolition of an existing service station, provided that
such development otherwise conforms to applicable law, does not result in an increase to the number of gas
pumping facilities, does not add any new accessory uses on site, and does not require a discretionary
entitlement to perform such improvement, renovation, or demolition; or (2) An application for a service station
that has been deemed complete or received all discretionary entitlements as of the moratorium's effective date,
provided that the City has issued a building permit for construction or redevelopment of the proposed service
station within six months of the moratorium's effective date. The moratorium shall thereafter apply to these
applications if a building permit has not been issued within that six month period, by title only and waive further
reading. Motion carried 5-0.
April 21, 2021 1 Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency,
Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes
City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 6 of 8
Page 15
I. COUNCIL BUSINESS
11. Consideration of Forming an Ad Hoc Committee to Review Planning Commission Applications.
(CITY)
City Manager Gillison informed that the Planning Commission recruitment was successful and
yielded 25 applicants. City Manager Gillison noted that while the full City Council usually
interviews all applicants, that it is not feasible given the unusually large number of applicants. He
stated that to comply with the City Code, staff has devised an alternative application process:
1. The City Council appoints an Ad Hoc Committee consisting of the Mayor, one Council
Member, the City Manager, and the Deputy City Manager of Economic and Community
Development.
2. The Ad Hoc Committee will conduct a paper review of applications and determine the top
15 applicants. Emphasis will be given to skills, abilities, or experience, which will
complement the current Planning Commission and assist with the new General Plan's
approval and implementation.
3. The Ad Hoc Committee will conduct a brief screening interview of the Top 15 applicants
and determine the Top 7.
4. The Top 7 applicants will be invited to an in-depth interview with the full City Council.
5. City Council will select the Top 3 applicants for appointment to the Planning Commission.
6. If additional strong candidates are identified through this process, they will be placed on
a list for consideration to fill potential future vacancies over the next 12-24 months.
City Manager Gillison recommended the City Council form the Ad Hoc Committee, appoint the
members as noted above, and select one Council Member to participate along with the Mayor.
Council Member Spagnolo nominated Council Member Scott to serve on the Ad Hoc Committee.
MOTION: Moved by Council Member Spagnolo, seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Kennedy, to form an Ad Hoc
Committee consisting of the Mayor, Council Member Scott, the City Manager, and the Deputy City Manager of
Economic and Community Development to Review Planning Commission Applications as outlined in the staff
report. Motion carried 5-0.
12. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS
None.
13. INTER -AGENCY UPDATES
Council Member Hutchison reported on his attendance at a Solid Waste Advisory Task Force meeting and
informed on a SB-1383 Implementation presentation by CalRecycle. Council Member Hutchison noted
that SB-1383 establishes targets to achieve a 50 percent reduction in the level of the statewide disposal
of organic waste from the 2014 level by 2020, and a 75 percent reduction by 2025.
J. CITY ATTORNEY ITEMS
None.
April 21, 2021 1 Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency,
Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes
City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 7 of 8
Page 16
K. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
None.
L. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Michael adjourned the City Council Meeting at 7:55 p.m.
Approved:
Respectfully submitted,
Linda A. Troyan, MMC
City Clerk Services Director
April 21, 2021 1 Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency,
Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes
City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 8 of 8
Page 17
DATE: May 19, 2021
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
President and Members of the Boards of Directors
FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY: Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services
Tamara L. Datman, Finance Director
SUBJECT: Consideration to Receive and File Current Investment Schedule as of
April 30, 2021 for the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho
Cucamonga Fire Protection District. (CITY/FIRE)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council/Board of Directors of the Fire Protection District receive
and file the attached current investment schedules for the City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) and
the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (District) as of April 30, 2021.
BACKGROUND:
The attached investment schedules as of April 30, 2021 reflect cash and investments managed
by the Finance Department/Revenue Management Division and are in conformity with the
requirements of California Government Code Section 53601 and the City of Rancho
Cucamonga's and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District's adopted Investment Policies
as approved on November 18, 2020.
ANALYSIS:
The City's and District's Treasurers are each required to submit a quarterly investment report to
the City Council and the Fire Board, respectively, in accordance with California Government Code
Section 53646. The quarterly investment report is required to be submitted within 30 days
following the end of the quarter covered by the report. However, the City and District Treasurers
have each elected to provide this report on a monthly basis.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:
The monthly investment schedule supports the City Council's core value of providing and
nurturing a high quality of life for all by demonstrating the active, prudent fiscal management of
the City's investment portfolio to ensure that financial resources are available to support the
various services the City provides to all Rancho Cucamonga stakeholders.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 - Investment Schedule (City)
Attachment 2 - Investment Schedule (Fire)
Page 18
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Portfolio Summary
RANCHO April 30, 2021
CUCAMONGA
Cash Dividends Closing
Portfolio Holdings and Income Market Value
PFM Managed Account
PFM Cash Balance
State Pool
Passbook/Checking Accounts
Total
$ 215,793.21
$ 215,793.21
$ 255,103,204.66
864,121.60
53, 659,127.04
2,599,884.22
$ 312,226,337.52
I certify that this report accurately reflects all City pooled investments and is in conformity with the investment
policy adopted November 18, 2020. A copy of the investment policy is available in the Finance Department. The
Investment Program herein shown provides sufficient cash flow liquidity to meet the next six months' estimated
expenditures. The attached Summary of Cash and Investments with Fiscal Agents is provided under the City's
official Investment Policy. The provisions of the individual bond documents govern the management of these
funds.
Jim rrington, reasurer
Date
PagTeT%CHMENT 1
0 PfM
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Opening Market Value
Maturities/Calls
Principal Dispositions
Principal Acquisitions
Unsettled Trades
Change in Current Value
Closing Market Value
Interest/Dividends/Coupons Received
Less Purchased Interest Related to Interest/Coupons
Plus Net Realized Gains/Losses
Total Cash Basis Earninas
Ending Amortized Value of Securities
Ending Accrued Interest
Plus Proceeds from Sales
Plus Proceeds of Maturities/Calls/Principal Payments
Plus Coupons/Dividends Received
Less Cost of New Purchases
Less Beginning Amortized Value of Securities
Less Beginning Accrued Interest
Total Accrual Basis Earnings
PFM Asset Management LLC
Managed Account Summary Statement
$255,073,077.78
0.00
(6,223,940.68)
6,064,789.30
0.00
189,278.26
$255,103,204.66
279,321.99
(368.85)
(63,159.93)
$215,793.21
255,160,134.42
771,581.49
6,234,512.04
0.00
268,750.63
(6,065,158.15)
(255,489,061.74)
(774,654.87)
$106,103.82
For the Month Ending April 30, 2021
Maturities/Calls
0.00
Sale Proceeds
6,234,512.04
Coupon/Interest/Dividend Income
268,750.63
Principal Payments
0.00
Security Purchases
(6,065,158.15)
Net Cash Contribution
0.00
Reconciling Transactions
0.00
Closing Cash Balance $864,121.60
Account 73340000 Page 1
Page 20
0 pfm Portfolio Summary and Statistics For the Month Ending April 30, 2021
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 4000
Account Summary Sector Allocation
Description Par Value Market Value Percent
U.S. Treasury Bond I Note 11 .1
Sup�Natfonal Agency Bond I Note 9,155,000.00
• Munidinal Bond I Note 1,475,000,000.58 FDIC
Federal Agency Bond / Note 11 •
Corporate Note
:1 11111 • 11• Corporate Note
Cn
I I•'.
Certificate of te••_ t 111111 161: 0.58 Fecl Any Bond
�t Backed Security 111 11
Total Portfolio 250,2,H),000.00 255r874,786.15 Muni Bond / Note
Yield W Maturity at Cult 0.4 %
Yield W Maturity at Market 0.37%
Weighted Average Days to Maturity 972
0-6 Mon s 6 12 MoMs 1-2Y®m 2-3Yem 3-4Years 4-5Yeam O 5Y®m
PFM Asset Management LLC Account)339a00D Page
Page 21
0 pfm
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Issuer
APPLE INC
CARMAX AUFO OWNER TRUST
CHARLES SCHWAB
CHIPPEWA VALLEY BANK
ENERBANK USA
FANNIE MAE
FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK5
FREDDIE MAC
GENERAL DYNAMICS ODW
GM FINANCIAL CONSUMER AUTOMOBILE TRUST
GM FINANCIAL UTASINGFRUSI
G MAN SACHS GROUP INC
HONDA AUTO RECFIVABLES
HYUNDAI AUFO LEASE SECURITIZATION TRUST
HYUNDAT AUTO REOMMUES
INTER-AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK
INTL BANK OF RECONSTRUCTION AND DEN
IP MORGAN CHASE & 00
LOCKJHEED MARTIN CORP
MEDALLION BANK UFAH
MERCEDES-BENZ AUFO OF SE TRUST
MICROSOFFCOW
MORGAN STANLEY
NONARTIS AG
SAN MATEOTOSIER CITY 54100E DISIRICF
THE BANK OF NEW YOM MELLON CORPORATION
THIRD FEDERAL SAV & LOAN
UNITED STATES TREASURY
US BPNCORP
WAl,,MART STORES INC
WELLS FARGO & COMPANY
PFM Asset Management LLC
Managed Account Issuer Summary
Market Value
of Holdings
8,183,213.97
930,023.03
664,103.22
243,823.51
245,355.74
32,Ml,68024
8,5W,W3.50
11,830,864.80
1,761,350.40
374,926.43
514,165.19
1,8T7,585.70
528,465.23
280,162.N
539,819.32
1,569,209.00
7,710,4 .11
W5,701.33
1,712,993. W
244,327.48
1 9,833.70
461,924.19
251,943.30
3,100,551.00
1,492,286.75
1,6W,12225
245,4 .03
160,986,974.33
2,599,690.00
3,098,334.W
252,153.02
Percent
3.21
0.36
0.26
0.10
0.10
12.69
3.36
4.64
0.69
0.15
0.20
0.74
0.21
0.11
0.21
0.61
3.02
0.24
0.67
0.10
0.07
0.18
0.10
1.22
0.%
0.65
0.10
0.10
1.02
1.21
0.10
For the Month Ending April 30, 2021
Arad 733a0000 Page 3
Page 22
0 Pf M
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Total
PFM Asset Management LLC
Managed Account Issuer Summary
$ 255,103, 204.66 100.00 %
For the Month Ending April 30, 2021
Account 73340000 Page 4
Page 23
0 PfM
Managed Account Detail of Securities Held For the Month Ending April 30, 2021
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Trade Settle Original YTM Accrued Amortized Market
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note
US TREASURY NOTES 9128286H8 2,910,000.00 AA+ Aaa 09/24/20 09/28/20 3,005,143.36 0.14 8,826.87 2,966,764.71 2,968,200.00
DTD 03/15/2019 2.375% 03/15/2022
US TREASURY NOTES 912828X47 8,000,000.00 AA+ Aaa 09/24/20 09/28/20 8,221,250.00 0.13 407.61 8,139,093.26 8,142,500.00
DTD 05/01/2017 1.875% 04/30/2022
US TREASURY NOTES 912828XD7 3,000,000.00 AA+ Aaa 11/12/20 11/13/20 3,079,218.75 0.16 23,489.01 3,055,481.22 3,057,656.40
DTD 06/01/2015 1.875% 05/31/2022
US TREASURY NOTES 912828ZX1 8,000,000.00 AA+ Aaa 09/24/20 09/28/20 7,998,437.50 0.14 3,342.54 7,998,962.40 8,003,750.40
DTD 06/30/2020 0.125% 06/30/2022
US TREASURY NOTES 912828XO8 2,935,000.00 AA+ Aaa 09/28/20 09/28/20 3,035,775.98 0.13 14,593.92 3,003,485.61 3,004,247.80
DTD 07/31/2015 2.000% 07/31/2022
US TREASURY NOTES 912828YKO 8,000,000.00 AA+ Aaa 09/24/20 09/28/20 8,202,500.00 0.14 4,808.74 8,144,216.87 8,145,000.00
DTD 10/15/2019 1.375% 10/15/2022
US TREASURY NOTES 912828TY6 5,750,000.00 AA+ Aaa 10/30/20 11/05/20 5,921,152.34 0.15 43.105.15 5,880,214.55 5,881,171.88
DTD 11/15/2012 1.625% 11/15/2022
US TREASURY NOTES 912828M80 8,400,000.00 AA+ Aaa 01/06/21 01/08/21 8,695,312.50 0.14 70,153.85 8,647,019.72 8,646,750.00
DTD 11/30/2015 2.000% 11/30/2022
US TREASURY NOTES 912828N30 5,000,000.00 AA+ Aaa 11/23/20 11/24/20 5,205,078.13 0.17 35,514.50 5,162,832.57 5,164,062.50
DTD 12/31/2015 2.125% 12/31/2022
US TREASURY NOTES 9128283U2 2,400,000.00 AA+ Aaa 11/17/20 11/20/20 2,515,031.25 0.19 14,171.27 2,491,795.51 2,493,000.00
DTD 01/31/2018 2.375% 01/31/2023
US TREASURY NOTES 9128284A5 1,810,000.00 AA+ Aaa 11/16/20 11/18/20 1,910,257.03 0.19 8,004.82 1,890,494.83 1,891,450.00
DTD 02/28/2018 2.625% 02/28/2023
US TREASURY NOTES 912828P79 7,000,000.00 AA+ Aaa 01/25/21 01/26/21 7,200,156.25 0.13 17,690.22 7,175,235.09 7,171,718.40
DTD 02/29/2016 1.500% 02/28/2023
US TREASURY NOTES 912828ZD5 5,000,000.00 AA+ Aaa 10/30/20 11/05/20 5,039,648.44 0.16 3,192.93 5,031,488.24 5,032,031.00
DTD 03/15/2020 0.500% 03/15/2023
US TREASURY NOTES 9128284L1 5,000,000.00 AA+ Aaa 10/06/20 10/07/20 5,329,882.81 0.17 373.64 5,257,202.75 5,256,250.00
DTD 04/30/2018 2.750% 04/30/2023
PFM Asset Management LLC Account 73340000 Page 5
Page 24
0 PfM
Managed Account Detail of Securities Held For the Month Ending April 30, 2021
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Trade Settle Original YTM Accrued Amortized Market
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note
US TREASURY NOTES 912828R69 3,500,000.00 AA+ Aaa 10/30/20 11/05/20 3,630,429.69 0.17 23,750.00 3,605,791.42 3,604,453.30
DTD 05/31/2016 1.625% 05/31/2023
US TREASURY NOTES 912828ZU7 6,500.000.00 AA+ Aaa 09/24/20 09/28/20 6,518.281.25 0.15 6,116.07 6,514,311.08 6,508.125.00
DTD 06/15/2020 0.250% 06/15/2023
US TREASURY NOTES 91282CAF8 5,000,000.00 AA+ Aaa 10/06/20 10/07/20 4,991,796.88 0.18 1,294.89 4,993,418.61 4,989,844.00
DTD 08/15/2020 0.125% 08/15/2023
US TREASURY NOTES 91282CAK7 5,000,000.00 AA+ Aaa 11/23/20 11/24/20 4,988,476.56 0.21 798.23 4,990,252.86 4,989,062.50
DTD 09/15/2020 0.125% 09/15/2023
US TREASURY NOTES 9128286GO 8,000,000.00 AA+ Aaa 09/24/20 09/28/20 8,600,312.50 0.18 32,010.87 8,496,976.08 8,465,000.00
DTD 02/28/2019 2.375% 02/29/2024
US TREASURY NOTES 912828X70 5,000,000.00 AA+ Aaa 10/30/20 11/05/20 5,307,031.25 0.23 271.74 5,264,307.56 5,246,875.00
DTD 05/01/2017 2.000% 04/30/2024
US TREASURY NOTES 912828Y87 5,670,000.00 AA+ Aaa 10/06/20 10/07/20 5,995,139.06 0.24 24,669.20 5,947,056.76 5,917,176.85
DTD 07/31/2019 1.750% 07/31/2024
US TREASURY NOTES 912828YE4 6,000,000.00 AA+ Aaa 01/25/21 01/26/21 6,216,328.13 0.24 12,635.87 6,200,676.06 6,163,125.00
DTD 08/31/2019 1.250% 08/31/2024
US TREASURY NOTES 9128282Y5 6,000.000.00 AA+ Aaa 09/24/20 09/28/20 6,457.968.75 0.21 10.799.18 6,390,666.44 6,341.250.00
DTD 10/02/2017 2.125% 09/30/2024
US TREASURY NOTES 912828YM6 2,500,000.00 AA+ Aaa 11/16/20 11/18/20 2,616,796.88 0.31 101.90 2,603,522.67 2,589,062.50
DTD 10/31/2019 1.500% 10/31/2024
US TREASURY NOTES 912828YV6 5,000,000.00 AA+ Aaa 11/23/20 11/24/20 5,239,843.75 0.30 31,318.68 5,214,011.91 5,178,125.00
DTD 11/30/2019 1.500% 11/30/2024
US TREASURY NOTES 9128283Z1 6,000,000.00 AA+ Aaa 09/24/20 09/28/20 6,663,750.00 0.23 27,798.91 6,575,332.25 6,500,625.00
DTD 02/28/2018 2.750% 02/28/2025
US TREASURY NOTES 912828ZFO 2,750,000.00 AA+ Aaa 11/17/20 11/20/20 2,769,335.94 0.34 1,164.62 2,767,368.34 2,740,976.70
DTD 03/31/2020 0.500% 03/31/2025
US TREASURY NOTES 91282CAB7 4,500,000.00 AA+ Aaa 01/25/21 01/26/21 4,478,730.47 0.36 2,796.96 4,479,957.31 4,420,547.10
DTD 07/31/2020 0.250% 07/31/2025
PFM Asset Management LLC Account 73340000 Page 6
Page 25
0 PfM
Managed Account Detail of Securities Held For the Month Ending April 30, 2021
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Trade Settle Original YTM Accrued Amortized Market
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note
US TREASURY NOTES 91282CAB7 7,000,000.00 AA+ Aaa 01/06/21 01/08/21 6,956,250.00 0.39 4,350.83 6,959,219.22 6,876,406.60
DTD 07/31/2020 0.250% 07/31/2025
US TREASURY NOTES 91282CB03 2,650,000.00 AA+ Aaa 03/02/21 03/03/21 2,623,810.55 0.70 2,232.34 2,624,658.15 2,610,250.00
DTD 02/28/2021 0.500% 02/28/2026
US TREASURY N/B NOTES 91282CBT7 3,000,000.00 AA+ AAA 04/02/21 04/06/21 2,973,632.81 0.93 1,905.74 2,973,995.00 2,988,281.40
DTD 03/31/2021 0.750% 03/31/2026
Security Type Sub -Total
Supra -National Agency Bond / Note
157,275,000.00
162,386,758.81
0.22
431,691.10
161,445,809.05
160,986,974.33
INTL BANK OF RECONSTRUCTION AND DEV
459058FY4
4,500,000.00
AAA
Aaa
07/26/17
07/26/17
4,510,530.00
1.95
23,750.00
4,501,728.33
4,560,835.50
NOTE
DTD 01/26/2017 2.000% 01/26/2022
INTL BK OF RECON AND DEV NOTE
459058JV6
1,745,000.00
AAA
Aaa
04/13/21
04/20/21
1,741,387.85
0.23
66.65
1,741,442.28
1,742,293.51
DTD 04/20/2021 0.125% 04/20/2023
INTL BK RECON & DEVELOP CORPORATE
459058JM6
1,410,000.00
AAA
Aaa
11/17/20
11/24/20
1,406,968.50
0.32
1,537.29
1,407,405.92
1,407,335.10
NOTES
DTD 11/24/2020 0.250% 11/24/2023
INTER-AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK
4581XODK1
1,500,000.00
AAA
Aaa
02/19/21
02/23/21
1,576,950.00
0.47
3,427.08
1,573,466.45
1,564,209.00
NOTES
DTD 01/16/2020 1.750% 03/14/2025
Security Type Sub -Total
Municipal :.Note
SAN MATEO-FOSTER SCH DIST, CA TXBL GO 799055004
BO
DTD 05/19/2020 1.062% 08/01/2021
SAN MATEO-FOSTER SCH DIST, CA TXBL GO 799055OR2
BO
DTD 05/19/2020 1.162% 08/01/2022
PFM Asset Management LLC
9,155,000.00 9,235,836.35 1.13
475,000.00 AA+ Aaa 05/19/20 05/19/20 476,197.00 0.85
500,000.00 AA+ Aaa 05/19/20 05/19/20 502,300.00 0.95
28,781.02 9,224,042.98 9,274,673.11
1,261.13 475,250.85 476,106.75
1,452.50 501,307.34 505,825.00
Account 73340000 Page 7
Page 26
0 PfM
Managed Account Detail of Securities Held For the Month Ending April 30, 2021
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Trade Settle Original YTM Accrued Amortized Market
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value
Municipal Bond / Note
SAN MATEO-FOSTER SCH DIST, CA TXBL GO 7990550SO 500,000.00 AA+ Aaa 05/19/20 05/19/20 503,385.00 1.05 1,582.50 502,380.21 510,355.00
BO
DTD 05/19/2020 1.266% 08/01/2023
Security Type Sub -Total 1,475,000.00 1,481,882.00 0.95 4,296.13 1,478,938.40 1,492,286.75
Federal Agency Bond / Note
FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK NOTES 3133EG5D3 1,500,000.00 AA+ Aaa 01/27/17 01/27/17 1,500,000.00 2.03 7,950.83 1,500,000.00 1,521,718.50
DTD 01/27/2017 2.030% 01/27/2022
FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK NOTES 3133EHHH9 4,000,000.00 AA+ Aaa 05/02/17 05/02/17 3,992,000.00 1.96 38,186.67 3,998,396.50 4,073,304.00
DTD 05/02/2017 1.920% 05/02/2022
FREDDIE MAC NOTES 3134GBVA7 3,000,000.00 AA+ Aaa 06/29/17 06/29/17 3,000,000.00 1.93 19,570.83 3,000,000.00 3,063,525.00
DTD 06/29/2017 1.925% 06/29/2022
FANNIE MAE NOTES 3135GO5G4 4,260,000.00 AA+ Aaa 09/24/20 09/28/20 4,261,192.80 0.24 3,283.75 4,260,940.14 4,262,564.52
DTD 07/10/2020 0.250% 07/10/2023
FREDDIE MAC NOTES 3137EAEW5 4,800,000.00 AA+ Aaa 09/24/20 09/28/20 4,802,928.00 0.23 1,766.67 4,802,342.40 4,800,854.40
DTD 09/04/2020 0.250% 09/08/2023
FREDDIE MAC NOTES 3137EAEZ8 1,700,000.00 AA+ Aaa 11/03/20 11/05/20 1,698,470.00 0.28 2,077.78 1,698,717.09 1,700,323.00
DTD 11/05/2020 0.250% 11/06/2023
FANNIE MAE NOTES 3135G06H1 4,400,000.00 AA+ Aaa 11/23/20 11/25/20 4,394,984.00 0.29 4,766.67 4,395,701.88 4,398,605.20
DTD 11/25/2020 0.250% 11/27/2023
FANNIE MAE NOTES 3135GOX24 4,325,000.00 AA+ Aaa 09/24/20 09/28/20 4,557,122.75 0.36 22,255.73 4,525,172.44 4,496,866.85
DTD 01/10/2020 1.625% 01/07/2025
FANNIE MAE NOTES 3135GO4Z3 4,000,000.00 AA+ Aaa 07/21/20 07/21/20 4,009,400.00 0.45 7,444.44 4,007,910.27 3,975,244.00
DTD 06/19/2020 0.500% 06/17/2025
FANNIE MAE NOTES 3135GO4Z3 5,000,000.00 AA+ Aaa 09/24/20 09/28/20 5,017,800.00 0.42 9,305.56 5,015,578.87 4,969,055.00
DTD 06/19/2020 0.500% 06/17/2025
FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK NOTES 3133ELR71 3,000,000.00 AA+ Aaa 07/21/20 07/21/20 3,007,110.00 0.45 4,958.33 3,005,992.55 2,974,671.00
DTD 07/02/2020 0.500% 07/02/2025
PFM Asset Management LLC Account 73340000 Page 8
Page 27
0 PfM
Managed Account Detail of Securities Held For the Month Ending April 30, 2021
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Trade Settle Original YTM Accrued Amortized Market
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value
Federal Agency Bond / Note
FANNIE MAE NOTES 3136G4ZJ5 2,500,000.00 AA+ Aaa 07/21/20 07/21/20 2,499,000.00 0.63 4,340.28 2,499,155.53 2,484,440.00
DTD 07/21/2020 0.625% 07/21/2025
FANNIE MAE NOTES 3135G05X7 2,000,000.00 AA+ Aaa 10/30/20 11/05/20 1,988,500.00 0.50 1,375.00 1,989,660.49 1,971,088.00
DTD 08/27/2020 0.375% 08/25/2025
FREDDIE MAC NOTES 3137EAEX3 2,300,000.00 AA+ Aaa 09/23/20 09/25/20 2,293,077.00 0.44 910.42 2,293,904.42 2,266,162.40
DTD 09/25/2020 0.375% 09/23/2025
FANNIE MAE NOTES 3135G06G3 1,390,000.00 AA+ Aaa 11/12/20 11/13/20 1,387,720.40 0.53 3,262.64 1,387,932.08 1,374,853.17
DTD 11/12/2020 0.500% 11/07/2025
FANNIE MAE NOTES 3135G06G3 4,500,000.00 AA+ Aaa 12/02/20 12/04/20 4,494,465.00 0.53 10,562.50 4,494,920.35 4,450,963.50
DTD 11/12/2020 0.500% 11/07/2025
Security Type Sub -Total 52,675,000.00 52,903,769.95 0.65 142,018.10 52,876,325.01 52,784,238.54
Corporate
MICROSOFT CORP (CALLABLE) NOTE 594918BW3 455,000.00 AAA Aaa 02/14/17 02/14/17 455,000.00 2.40 2,578.33 455,000.00 461,924.19
DTD 02/06/2017 2.400% 02/06/2022
WAL-MART STORES INC CORP (CALLABLE) 931142DU4 3,000,000.00 AA Aa2 06/21/18 06/21/18 2,913,840.00 3.04 26,633.33 2,968,807.77 3,098,334.00
NOTE
DTD 10/20/2017 2.350% 12/15/2022
APPLE INC GLOBAL NOTES 037833AK6 3,390,000.00 AA+ Aal 05/06/19 05/06/19 3,348,574.20 2.73 40,228.00 3,369,201.86 3,531,183.33
DTD 05/03/2013 2.400% 05/03/2023
APPLE INC CORPORATE NOTES 037833DV9 1,440,000.00 AA+ Aal 05/11/20 05/11/20 1,444,737.60 0.64 5,100.00 1,443,201.67 1,453,832.64
DTD 05/11/2020 0.750% 05/11/2023
APPLE INC (CALLABLE) BONDS 037833CG3 3,000,000.00 AA+ Aal 02/11/19 02/11/19 3,019,140.00 2.86 20,500.00 3,010,341.25 3,198,198.00
DTD 02/09/2017 3.000% 02/09/2024
CHARLES SCHWAB CORP NOTES 808513BN4 660,000.00 A A2 03/16/21 03/18/21 659.670.00 0.77 591.25 659,683.25 664,103.22
(CALLABLE)
DTD 03/18/2021 0.750% 03/18/2024
PFM Asset Management LLC Account 73340000 Page 9
Page 28
0 PfM
Managed Account Detail of Securities Held For the Month Ending April 30, 2021
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Trade Settle Original YTM Accrued Amortized Market
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value
Corporate
US BANK NA CINCINNATI (CALLABLE) 90331HPL1 2,500,000.00 AA- Al 10/30/20 11/05/20 2,640,450.00 0.69 14,236.11 2,624,286.38 2,599,690.00
CORPORA
DTD 01/21/2020 2.050% 01/21/2025
NOVARTIS CAPITAL CORP 66989HAP3 3,000,000.00 AA- Al 09/24/20 09/28/20 3,144,750.00 0.63 11.229.17 3,124,914.91 3,100,551.00
DTD 02/14/2020 1.750% 02/14/2025
]PMORGAN CHASE & CO CORP NOTES 46647PBY1 610,000.00 A- A2 02/09/21 02/16/21 610,000.00 0.56 715.48 610,000.00 605,701.33
(CALLABLE
DTD 02/16/2021 0.563% 02/16/2025
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP NOTES 539830BE8 1,600,000.00 A- A3 03/05/21 03/09/21 1,714,864.00 1.05 7,733.33 1,710,397.53 1,712,993.60
(CALLABLE)
DTD 02/20/2015 2.900% 03/01/2025
GENERAL DYNAMICS CORP 369550BG2 1,600,000.00 A- A2 03/05/21 03/09/21 1,757,296.00 1.09 25,822.22 1,751,840.05 1,761,350.40
DTD 05/11/2018 3.500% 05/15/2025
BANK OF NY MELLON CORP (CALLABLE) 06406RAOO 1,685,000.00 A Al 01/28/21 02/01/21 1,684,005.85 0.76 3,264.69 1,684,054.41 1,669,122.25
CORPOR
DTD 01/28/2021 0.750% 01/28/2026
GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC CORPORATE 38141GXS8 1,900,000.00 BBB+ A2 02/12/21 02/17/21 1,903,876.00 0.81 3,564.88 1,903,720.62 1,877,585.70
NOTES
DTD 02/12/2021 0.855% 02/12/2026
Security Type Sub -Total 24,840,000.00 25,296,203.65 1.61 162,196.79 25,315,449.70 25,734,569.66
DepositCertificate of
THIRD FED SAV&LN CLEVLND 884130BZO 245,000.00 NR NR 02/28/18 02/28/18 245,000.00 2.50 1,040.41 245,000.00 245,464.03
DTD 02/28/2018 2.500% 05/28/2021
WELLS FARGO BANK NA 949763S64 245,000.00 NR NR 01/29/20 01/29/20 245,000.00 1.90 25.51 245,000.00 252,153.02
DTD 01/29/2020 1.900% 01/30/2023
MORGAN STANLEY PVT BANK 6176OA607 245,000.00 NR NR 01/30/20 01/30/20 245,000.00 1.85 1,130.02 245,000.00 251,943.30
DTD 01/30/2020 1.850% 01/30/2023
ENERBANK USA 29278TOD5 245,000.00 NR NR 07/24/20 07/24/20 245.000.00 0.45 21.14 245,000.00 245,355.74
DTD 07/24/2020 0.450% 07/24/2024
PFM Asset Management LLC Account 73340000 Page 10
Page 29
0 PfM
Managed Account Detail of Securities Held For the Month Ending April 30, 2021
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Trade Settle Original YTM Accrued Amortized Market
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value
.T
CHIPPEWA VALLEY BANK
DTD 07/29/2020 0.500% 07/29/2025
MEDALLION BANK UTAH
DTD 07/30/2020 0.550% 07/30/2025
169894AT9
58404DHO7
245,000.00
245,000.00
NR
NR
NR
NR
07/29/20
07/30/20
07/29/20
07/30/20
245.000.00
245,000.00
0.50
0.55
6.71
3.69
245,000.00
245,000.00
243,823.51
244,327.48
Security Type Sub -Total
Asset -Backed Security
1,470,000.00
1,470,000.00
1.30
2,227.48
1,470,000.00
1,483,067.08
MBALT 2021-A A3
58770GAC4
180,000.00
AAA
Aaa
01/20/21
01/27/21
179,981.80
0.25
20.00
179,983.38
179,833.70
DTD 01/27/2021 0.250% 01/16/2024
HALST 2021-A A4
44891TAD8
280,000.00
AAA
Aaa
01/12/21
01/20/21
279,976.70
0.42
52.27
279,978.35
280,162.29
DTD 01/20/2021 0.420% 12/16/2024
GMALT 2021-1 A4
36261RADO
515,000.00
NR
Aaa
02/17/21
02/24/21
514,922.24
0.33
51.93
514,925.76
514,165.19
DTD 02/24/2021 0.330% 02/20/2025
HAROT 2021-1 A3
43813GAC5
530,000.00
NR
Aaa
02/17/21
02/24/21
529,990.30
0.27
39.75
529,990.72
528,465.23
DTD 02/24/2021 0.270% 04/21/2025
HART 2021-A A3
44933LAC7
540,000.00
AAA
NR
04/20/21
04/28/21
539,943.19
0.38
17.10
539,943.30
539,819.32
DTD 04/28/2021 0.380% 09/15/2025
GMCAR 2021-1 A3
36261LAC5
375,000.00
AAA
Aaa
01/12/21
01/20/21
374,940.30
0.35
54.69
374,943.79
374,926.43
DTD 01/20/2021 0.350% 10/16/2025
CARMX 2021-1 A3
14316NAC3
120,000.00
AAA
NR
01/20/21
01/27/21
119,976.29
0.34
18.13
119,977.54
119,724.30
DTD 01/27/2021 0.340% 12/15/2025
CARMX 2021-2 A3
14314OAC8
810,000.00
AAA
NR
04/13/21
04/21/21
809.825.45
0.52
117.00
809,826.44
810,298.73
DTD 04/21/2021 0.520% 02/17/2026
Security Type Sub -Total
3,350,000.00
3,349,556.27
0.38
370.87
3,349,569.28
3,347,395.19
Managed Account Sub -Total 250,240,000.00 256,124,007.03 0.49 771,581.49 255,160,134.42 255,103,204.66
PFM Asset Management LLC Account 73340000 Page 11
Page 30
0 Pf M
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Securities Sub -Total
Accrued Interest
Total Investments
PFM Asset Management LLC
Managed Account Detail of Securities Held
For the Month Ending April 30, 2021
$250,240,000.00 $256,124,007.03 0.49% $771,581.49 $255,160,134.42 $255,103,204.66
$771,581.49
$255,874,786.15
Account 73340000 Page 12
Page 31
0 Pfm
Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics For the Month Ending April 30, 2021
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Security Type/Description Next Call Market Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/L Effective YTM
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par Broker Date Price Value On Cost Amort Cost Duration at Mkt
U.S. Treasury Bond I Note
US TREASURY NOTES 9128286H8 2,910,000.00 BMO 102.00 2,968,200.00 (36,943.36) 1,435.29 0.87 0.09
DTD 03/15/2019 2.375% 03/15/2022
US TREASURY NOTES 912828X47 8,000,000.00 NOMURA 101.78 8,142,500.00 (78,750.00) 3,406.74 1.00 0.09
DTD 05/01/2017 1.875% 04/30/2022
US TREASURY NOTES 912828XD7 3,000,000.00 CITIGRP 101.92 3,057,656.40 (21,562.35) 2,175.18 1.07 0.10
DTD 06/01/2015 1.875% 05/31/2022
US TREASURY NOTES 912828ZX1 8,000,000.00 WELLS_F 100.05 8,003,750.40 5,312.90 4,788.00 1.17 0.08
DTD 06/30/2020 0.125% 06/30/2022
US TREASURY NOTES 912828XO8 2,935,000.00 BONY 102.36 3,004,247.80 (31,528.18) 762.19 1.24 0.12
DTD 07/31/2015 2.000% 07/31/2022
US TREASURY NOTES 912828YKO 8,000,000.00 CITIGRP 101.81 8,145,000.00 (57,500.00) 783.13 1.45 0.13
DTD 10/15/2019 1.375% 10/15/2022
US TREASURY NOTES 912828TY6 5,750,000.00 CITIGRP 102.28 5,881,171.88 (39,980.46) 957.33 1.52 0.14
DTD 11/15/2012 1.625% 11/15/2022
US TREASURY NOTES 912828M80 8,400,000.00 CITIGRP 102.94 8,646,750.00 (48,562.50) (269.72) 1.56 0.14
DTD 11/30/2015 2.000% 11/30/2022
US TREASURY NOTES 912828N30 5,000,000.00 NOMURA 103.28 5,164,062.50 (41,015.63) 1,229.93 1.64 0.16
DTD 12/31/2015 2.125% 12/31/2022
US TREASURY NOTES 9128283U2 2,400,000.00 CITIGRP 103.88 2,493,000.00 (22,031.25) 1,204.49 1.72 0.16
DTD 01/31/2018 2.375% 01/31/2023
US TREASURY NOTES 9128284A5 1,810,000.00 CITIGRP 104.50 1,891,450.00 (18,807.03) 955.17 1.80 0.17
DTD 02/28/2018 2.625% 02/28/2023
US TREASURY NOTES 912828P79 7,000,000.00 BNP_PAR 102.45 7,171,718.40 (28,437.85) (3,516.69) 1.81 0.16
DTD 02/29/2016 1.500% 02/28/2023
US TREASURY NOTES 912828ZD5 5,000,000.00 WELLS_F 100.64 5,032,031.00 (7,617.44) 542.76 1.87 0.16
DTD 03/15/2020 0.500% 03/15/2023
US TREASURY NOTES 9128284L1 5,000,000.00 CITIGRP 105.13 5,256,250.00 (73,632.81) (952.75) 1.96 0.18
DTD 04/30/2018 2.750% 04/30/2023
US TREASURY NOTES 912828R69 3,500,000.00 NOMURA 102.98 3,604,453.30 (25,976.39) (1,338.12) 2.05 0.19
DTD 05/31/2016 1.625% 05/31/2023
US TREASURY NOTES 912828ZU7 6,500,000.00 WELLS_F 100.13 6,508,125.00 (10,156.25) (6,186.08) 2.12 0.19
DTD 06/15/2020 0.250% 06/15/2023
US TREASURY NOTES 91282CAF8 5,000,000.00 HSBC 99.80 4,989,844.00 (1,952.88) (3,574.61) 2.29 0.21
DTD 08/15/2020 0.125% 08/15/2023
PFM Asset Management LLC Account 73340000 Page 13
Page 32
0 PfM
Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics For the Month Ending April 30, 2021
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Security Type/Description Next Call Market Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/L Effective YTM
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par Broker Date Price Value On Cost Amort Cost Duration at Mkt
US TREASURY NOTES
91282CAK7
5,000,000.00
NOMURA
99.78
4,989,062.50
585.94
(1,190.36)
2.37
0.22
DTD 09/15/2020 0.125% 09/15/2023
US TREASURY NOTES
9128286GO
8,000,000.00
RBS
105.81
8,465,000.00
(135,312.50)
(31,976.08)
2.75
0.31
DTD 02/28/2019 2.375% 02/29/2024
US TREASURY NOTES
912828X70
5,000,000.00
MORGAN_
104.94
5,246,875.00
(60,156.25)
(17,432.56)
2.93
0.34
DTD 05/01/2017 2.000% 04/30/2024
US TREASURY NOTES
912828Y87
5,670,000.00
WELLS_F
104.36
5,917,176.85
(77,962.21)
(29,879.91)
3.17
0.40
DTD 07/31/2019 1.750% 07/31/2024
US TREASURY NOTES
912828YE4
6,000,000.00
BNP_PAR
102.72
6,163,125.00
(53,203.13)
(37,551.06)
3.27
0.43
DTD 08/31/2019 1.250% 08/31/2024
US TREASURY NOTES
9128282Y5
6,000,000.00
CITIGRP
105.69
6,341,250.00
(116,718.75)
(49,416.44)
3.31
0.45
DTD 10/02/2017 2.125% 09/30/2024
US TREASURY NOTES
912828YM6
2,500,000.00
CITIGRP
103.56
2,589,062.50
(27,734.38)
(14,460.17)
3.42
0.47
DTD 10/31/2019 1.500% 10/31/2024
US TREASURY NOTES
912828YV6
5,000,000.00
NOMURA
103.56
5,178,125.00
(61,718.75)
(35,886.91)
3.48
0.50
DTD 11/30/2019 1.500% 11/30/2024
US TREASURY NOTES
9128283Z1
6,000,000.00
MERRILL
108.34
6,500,625.00
(163,125.00)
(74,707.25)
3.66
0.55
DTD 02/28/2018 2.750% 02/28/2025
US TREASURY NOTES
912828ZFO
2,750,000.00
MORGAN_
99.67
2,740,976.70
(28,359.24)
(26,391.64)
3.88
0.58
DTD 03/31/2020 0.500% 03/31/2025
US TREASURY NOTES
91282CAB7
4,500,000.00
BNP_PAR
98.23
4,420,547.10
(58,183.37)
(59,410.21)
4.23
0.67
DTD 07/31/2020 0.250% 07/31/2025
US TREASURY NOTES
91282CAB7
7,000,000.00
JPM_CHA
98.23
6,876,406.60
(79,843.40)
(82,812.62)
4.23
0.67
DTD 07/31/2020 0.250% 07/31/2025
US TREASURY NOTES
91282CB03
2,650,000.00
CITIGRP
98.50
2,610,250.00
(13,560.55)
(14,408.15)
4.78
0.82
DTD 02/28/2021 0.500% 02/28/2026
US TREASURY N/B NOTES
91282CBT7
3,000,000.00
NOMURA
99.61
2,988,281.40
14,648.59
14,286.40
5.31
0.83
DTD 03/31/2021 0.750% 03/31/2026
Security Type Sub -Total 157,275,000.00 160,986,974.33 (1,399,784.48) (458,834.72) 2.43 0.29
PFM Asset Management LLC Account 73340000 Page 14
Page 33
0 PfM
Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics For the Month Ending April 30, 2021
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Security Type/Description Next Call Market Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/L Effective YTM
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par Broker Date Price Value On Cost Amort Cost Duration at Mkt
INTL BANK OF RECONSTRUCTION AND
459058FY4
4,500,000.00 NEW ACC
101.35
4,560,835.50
50,305.50
59,107.17
0.73
0.17
DEV NOTE
DTD 01/26/2017 2.000% 01/26/2022
INTL BK OF RECON AND DEV NOTE
459058JV6
1,745,000.00 TD
99.84
1,742,293.51
905.66
851.23
1.97
0.21
DTD 04/20/2021 0.125% 04/20/2023
INTL BK RECON & DEVELOP CORPORATE
459058JM6
1,410,000.00 TD
99.81
1,407,335.10
366.60
(70.82)
2.56
0.32
NOTES
DTD 11/24/2020 0.250% 11/24/2023
INTER-AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK
4581XODK1
1,500,000.00 MORGAN_
104.28
1,564,209.00
(12,741.00)
(9,257.45)
3.76
0.63
NOTES
DTD 01/16/2020 1.750% 03/14/2025
Security Type Sub -Total 9,155,000.00 9,274,673.11 38,836.76 50,630.13 1.75 0.28
SAN MATEO-FOSTER SCH DIST, CA TXBL 799055004 475,000.00 NEW ACC 100.23 476,106.75 (90.25) 855.90 0.25 0.14
GO BO
DTD 05/19/2020 1.062% 08/01/2021
SAN MATEO-FOSTER SCH DIST, CA TXBL 799055OR2 500,000.00 NEW ACC 101.17 505,825.00 3,525.00 4,517.66 1.24 0.23
GO BO
DTD 05/19/2020 1.162% 08/01/2022
SAN MATEO-FOSTER SCH DIST, CA TXBL 7990550SO 500,000.00 NEW ACC 102.07 510,355.00 6,970.00 7,974.79 2.22 0.34
GO BO
DTD 05/19/2020 1.266% 08/01/2023
Security Type Sub -Total 1,475,000.00 1,492,286.75 10,404.75 13,348.35 1.26 0.24
FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK NOTES 3133EG5D3 1.500,000.00 NEW ACC
DTD 01/27/2017 2.030% 01/27/2022
FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK NOTES 3133EHHH9 4.000,000.00 NEW ACC
DTD 05/02/2017 1.920% 05/02/2022
FREDDIE MAC NOTES 3134GBVA7 3.000,000.00 NEW ACC
DTD 06/29/2017 1.925% 06/29/2022
PFM Asset Management LLC
101.45
1,521,718.50
21,718.50
21,718.50
0.74
0.08
101.83
4,073,304.00
81,304.00
74,907.50
0.99
0.10
102.12
3,063,525.00
63,525.00
63,525.00
1.15
0.10
Account 73340000 Page 15
Page 34
0 PfM
Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics For the Month Ending April 30, 2021
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Security Type/Description Next Call Market Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/L Effective YTM
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par Broker Date Price Value On Cost Amort Cost Duration at Mkt
FANNIE MAE NOTES
3135GO5G4
4,260,000.00
MORGAN_
100.06
4,262,564.52
1,371.72
1,624.38
2.19
0.22
DTD 07/10/2020 0.250% 07/10/2023
FREDDIE MAC NOTES
3137EAEW5
4,800,000.00
KEYBANC
100.02
4,800,854.40
(2,073.60)
(1,488.00)
2.35
0.24
DTD 09/04/2020 0.250% 09/08/2023
FREDDIE MAC NOTES
3137EAEZ8
1,700,000.00
CITIGRP
100.02
1,700,323.00
1,853.00
1,605.91
2.51
0.24
DTD 11/05/2020 0.250% 11/06/2023
FANNIE MAE NOTES
3135G06H1
4,400,000.00
NOMURA
99.97
4,398,605.20
3,621.20
2,903.32
2.57
0.26
DTD 11/25/2020 0.250% 11/27/2023
FANNIE MAE NOTES
3135GOX24
4,325,000.00
RBS
103.97
4,496,866.85
(60,255.90)
(28,305.59)
3.58
0.53
DTD 01/10/2020 1.625% 01/07/2025
FANNIE MAE NOTES
3135GO4Z3
4,000,000.00
NEW ACC
99.38
3,975,244.00
(34,156.00)
(32,666.27)
4.09
0.65
DTD 06/19/2020 0.500% 06/17/2025
FANNIE MAE NOTES
3135GO4Z3
5,000,000.00
HSBC
99.38
4,969,055.00
(48,745.00)
(46,523.87)
4.09
0.65
DTD 06/19/2020 0.500% 06/17/2025
FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK NOTES
3133ELR71
3,000,000.00
NEW ACC
99.16
2,974,671.00
(32,439.00)
(31,321.55)
4.13
0.71
DTD 07/02/2020 0.500% 07/02/2025
FANNIE MAE NOTES
3136G4ZJ5
2,500,000.00
NEW ACC
99.38
2,484,440.00
(14,560.00)
(14,715.53)
4.17
0.77
DTD 07/21/2020 0.625% 07/21/2025
FANNIE MAE NOTES
3135GO5X7
2,000,000.00
NOMURA
98.55
1,971,088.00
(17,412.00)
(18,572.49)
4.29
0.72
DTD 08/27/2020 0.375% 08/25/2025
FREDDIE MAC NOTES
3137EAEX3
2,300,000.00
CITIGRP
98.53
2,266,162.40
(26,914.60)
(27,742.02)
4.36
0.72
DTD 09/25/2020 0.375% 09/23/2025
FANNIE MAE NOTES
3135GO6G3
1,390,000.00
BMO
98.91
1,374,853.17
(12,867.23)
(13,078.91)
4.46
0.75
DTD 11/12/2020 0.500% 11/07/2025
FANNIE MAE NOTES
3135GO6G3
4,500,000.00
JEFFERI
98.91
4,450,963.50
(43,501.50)
(43,956.85)
4.46
0.75
DTD 11/12/2020 0.500% 11/07/2025
Security Type Sub -Total 52,675,000.00 52,784,238.54 (119,531.41) (92,086.47) 3.12 0.46
MICROSOFT CORP (CALLABLE) NOTE 594918BW3 455,000.00 NEW ACC 01/06/22 101.52 461,924.19 6,924.19 6,924.19 0.68 0.41
DTD 02/06/2017 2.400% 02/06/2022
PFM Asset Management LLC Account 73340000 Page 16
Page 35
0 PfM
Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics For the Month Ending April 30, 2021
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Security Type/Description Next Call Market Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/L Effective YTM
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par Broker Date Price Value On Cost Amort Cost Duration at Mkt
WAL-MART STORES INC CORP (CALLABLE)
931142DU4
3,000,000.00 NEW ACC
11/15/22
103.28
3,098,334.00
184,494.00
129,526.23
1.51
0.33
NOTE
DTD 10/20/2017 2.350% 12/15/2022
APPLE INC GLOBAL NOTES
037833AK6
3,390,000.00 NEW ACC
104.16
3,531,183.33
182,609.13
161,981.47
1.95
0.32
DTD 05/03/2013 2.400% 05/03/2023
APPLE INC CORPORATE NOTES
037833DV9
1,440,000.00 NEW ACC
100.96
1,453,832.64
9,095.04
10,630.97
2.01
0.28
DTD 05/11/2020 0.750% 05/11/2023
APPLE INC (CALLABLE) BONDS
037833CG3
3,000,000.00 NEW ACC
12/09/23
106.61
3,198,198.00
179,058.00
187,856.75
2.52
0.60
DTD 02/09/2017 3.000% 02/09/2024
CHARLES SCHWAB CORP NOTES
808513BN4
660,000.00 CSFB
02/18/24
100.62
664,103.22
4,433.22
4,419.97
2.77
0.53
(CALLABLE)
DTD 03/18/2021 0.750% 03/18/2024
US BANK NA CINCINNATI (CALLABLE)
90331HPL1
2,500,000.00 US_BANC
103.99
2,599,690.00
(40,760.00)
(24,596.38)
3.59
0.96
CORPORA
DTD 01/21/2020 2.050% 01/21/2025
NOVARTIS CAPITAL CORP
66989HAP3
3,000,000.00 US_BANC
01/14/25
103.35
3,100,551.00
(44,199.00)
(24,363.91)
3.59
0.85
DTD 02/14/2020 1.750% 02/14/2025
]PMORGAN CHASE & CO CORP NOTES
46647PBY1
610,000.00 JPM_CHA
02/16/24
99.30
605,701.33
(4,298.67)
(4,298.67)
2.77
0.75
(CALLABLE
DTD 02/16/2021 0.563% 02/16/2025
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP NOTES
539830BE8
1,600,000.00 MERRILL
12/01/24
107.06
1,712,993.60
(1,870.40)
2,596.07
3.42
1.02
(CALLABLE)
DTD 02/20/2015 2.900% 03/01/2025
GENERAL DYNAMICS CORP
369550BG2
1,600,000.00 SUSQ
110.08
1,761,350.40
4,054.40
9,510.35
3.76
0.95
DTD 05/11/2018 3.500% 05/15/2025
BANK OF NY MELLON CORP (CALLABLE)
06406RAOO
1,685,000.00 MITSU
12/28/25
99.06
1,669,122.25
(14,883.60)
(14,932.16)
4.58
0.95
CORPOR
DTD 01/28/2021 0.750% 01/28/2026
GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC CORPORATE
38141GXS8
1,900,000.00 MERRILL
98.82
1,877,585.70
(26,290.30)
(26,134.92)
4.69
1.11
NOTES
DTD 02/12/2021 0.855% 02/12/2026
Security Type Sub -Total 24,840,000.00 25,734,569.66 438,366.01 419,119.96 2.94 0.69
PFM Asset Management LLC Account 73340000 Page 17
Page 36
0 PfM
Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics For the Month Ending April 30, 2021
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Security Type/Description Next Call Market Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/L Effective YTM
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par Broker Date Price Value On Cost Amort Cost Duration at Mkt
THIRD FED SAV&LN CLEVLND
884130BZO
245,000.00 NEW ACC
100.19
245,464.03
464.03
464.03
0.08
0.05
DTD 02/28/2018 2.500% 05/28/2021
WELLS FARGO BANK NA
949763S64
245,000.00 NEW ACC
102.92
252,153.02
7,153.02
7,153.02
1.72
0.23
DTD 01/29/2020 1.900% 01/30/2023
MORGAN STANLEY PVT BANK
6176OA607
245,000.00 NEW ACC
102.83
251,943.30
6,943.30
6,943.30
1.73
0.23
DTD 01/30/2020 1.850% 01/30/2023
ENERBANK USA
29278TOD5
245,000.00 NEW ACC
100.15
245,355.74
355.74
355.74
3.21
0.40
DTD 07/24/2020 0.450% 07/24/2024
CHIPPEWA VALLEY BANK
169894AT9
245,000.00 NEW ACC
99.52
243,823.51
(1,176.49)
(1,176.49)
4.20
0.61
DTD 07/29/2020 0.500% 07/29/2025
MEDALLION BANK UTAH
58404DHO7
245,000.00 NEW ACC
99.73
244,327.48
(672.52)
(672.52)
4.20
0.62
DTD 07/30/2020 0.550% 07/30/2025
Security Type Sub -Total 1,470,000.00 1,483,067.08 13,067.08 13,067.08 2.51 0.36
MBALT 2021-A A3
58770GAC4
180,000.00
MITSU
99.91
179,833.70
(148.10)
(149.68)
1.48
0.28
DTD 01/27/2021 0.250% 01/16/2024
HALST 2021-A A4
44891TAD8
280,000.00
SOCGEN
100.06
280,162.29
185.59
183.94
2.03
0.40
DTD 01/20/2021 0.420% 12/16/2024
GMALT 2021-1 A4
36261RADO
515,000.00
RBC
99.84
514,165.19
(757.05)
(760.57)
2.06
0.37
DTD 02/24/2021 0.330% 02/20/2025
HAROT 2021-1 A3
43813GAC5
530,000.00
3PM_CHA
99.71
528,465.23
(1,525.07)
(1,525.49)
2.01
0.34
DTD 02/24/2021 0.270% 04/21/2025
HART 2021-A A3
44933LAC7
540,000.00
BARCLAY
99.97
539,819.32
(123.87)
(123.98)
2.24
0.39
DTD 04/28/2021 0.380% 09/15/2025
GMCAR 2021-1 A3
36261LAC5
375,000.00
DEUTSCH
99.98
374,926.43
(13.87)
(17.36)
2.10
0.35
DTD 01/20/2021 0.350% 10/16/2025
CARMX 2021-1 A3
14316NAC3
120,000.00
MITSU
99.77
119,724.30
(251.99)
(253.24)
2.26
0.39
DTD 01/27/2021 0.340% 12/15/2025
CARMX 2021-2 A3
143140ACS
810,000.00
MERRILL
100.04
810,298.73
473.28
472.29
2.54
0.51
DTD 04/21/2021 0.520% 02/17/2026
Security Type Sub -Total 3,350,000.00 3,347,395.19 (2,161.08) (2,174.09) 2.17 0.40
PFM Asset Management LLC Account 73340000 Page 18
Page 37
0 Pf M
Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Security Type/Description Next Call Market Market Unreal G/L
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par Broker Date Price Value On Cost
For the Month Ending April 30, 2021
Unreal G/L Effective YTM
Amort Cost Duration at Mkt
Managed Account Sub -Total 250,240,000.00 255,103,204.66 (1,020,802.37) (56,929.76) 2.59 0.37
Securities Sub -Total $250,240,000.00 $255,103,204.66 ($1,020,802.37) ($56,929.76)
Accrued Interest $771,581.49
Total Investments $255,874,786.15
FFM Asset Management LLC
2.59 0.37%
Account 73340000 Page 19
Page 38
0 Pfm
Managed Account Security Transactions & Interest
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Transaction Type Principal Accrued
Trade Settle Securitv Description CUSIP Par Proceeds Interest
04/02/21 04/06/21 US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 03/31/2021 0.750% 03/31/2026
04/13/21 04/20/21 INTL BK OF RECON AND DEV NOTE
DTD 04/20/2021 0.125% 04/20/2023
04/13/21 04/21/21 CARMX 2021-2 A3
DTD 04/21/2021 0.520% 02/17/2026
04/20/21 04/28/21 HART 2021-A A3
DTD 04/28/2021 0.380% 09/15/2025
Transaction Type Sub -Total
04/02/21 04/02/21
MONEY MARKET FUND
04/15/21 04/15/21
MBALT 2021-A A3
DTD 01/27/2021 0.250% 01/16/2024
04/15/21 04/15/21
CARMX 2021-1 A3
DTD 01/27/2021 0.340% 12/15/2025
04/15/21 04/15/21
US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 10/15/2019 1.375% 10/15/2022
04/15/21 04/15/21
HALST 2021-A A4
DTD 01/20/2021 0.420% 12/16/2024
04/16/21 04/16/21
GMCAR 2021-1 A3
DTD 01/20/2021 0.350% 10/16/2025
04/20/21 04/20/21
GMALT 2021-1 A4
DTD 02/24/2021 0.330% 02/20/2025
04/21/21 04/21/21
HAROT 2021-1 A3
DTD 02/24/2021 0.270% 04/21/2025
04/24/21 04/24/21
ENERBANK USA
DTD 07/24/2020 0.450% 07/24/2024
04/29/21 04/29/21
WELLS FARGO BANK NA
DTD 01/29/2020 1.900% 01/30/2023
04/29/21 04/29/21
CHIPPEWA VALLEY BANK
DTD 07/29/2020 0.500% 07/29/2025
04/30/21 04/30/21
US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 05/01/2017 2.000% 04/30/2024
For the Month Ending April 30, 2021
Realized GIL Realized GIL Sale
Total Cost Amort Cost Method
91282CBT7
3,000,000.00
(2,973,632.81)
(368.85)
(2,974,001.66)
459058JV6
1,745,000.00
(1,741,387.85)
0.00
(1,741,387.85)
14314OAC8
810,000.00
(809,825.45)
0.00
(809,825.45)
44933LAC7
540,000.00
(539,943.19)
0.00
(539,943.19)
6,095,000.00 (6,064,789.30) (368.85) (6,065,158.15)
MONEY0002
0.00
0.00
3.38
3.38
58770GAC4
180,000.00
0.00
37.50
37.50
14316NAC3
120,000.00
0.00
34.00
34.00
912828YKO
8,000,000.00
0.00
55,000.00
55,000.00
44891TAD8
280,000.00
0.00
98.00
98.00
36261LAC5
375,000.00
0.00
109.38
109.38
36261RADO
515,000.00
0.00
141.63
141.63
43813GAC5
530,000.00
0.00
119.25
119.25
29278TOD5
245,000.00
0.00
93.64
93.64
949763S64
245,000.00
0.00
395.36
395.36
169894AT9
245,000.00
0.00
104.04
104.04
912828X70
5,000,000.00
0.00
50,000.00
50,000.00
PFM Asset Management LLC Account 73340000 Page 20
Page 39
0 Pfm
Managed Account Security Transactions & Interest
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000
Transaction Type Principal Accrued
Trade Settle Securitv Description CUSIP Par Proceeds Interest
04/30/21 04/30/21
MEDALLION BANK UTAH
DTD 07/30/2020 0.550% 07/30/2025
04/30/21 04/30/21
US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 05/01/2017 1.875% 04/30/2022
04/30/21 04/30/21
US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 10/31/2019 1.500% 10/31/2024
04/30/21 04/30/21
US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 04/30/2018 2.750% 04/30/2023
Transaction Type Sub -Total
For the Month Ending April 30, 2021
Realized GIL Realized GIL Sale
Total Cost Amort Cost Method
58404DHO7
245,000.00
0.00
114.45
114.45
912828X47
8,000,000.00
0.00
75,000.00
75,000.00
912828YM6
2,500,000.00
0.00
18,750.00
18,750.00
9128284L1
5,000,000.00
0.00
68,750.00
68,750.00
31,480,000.00 0.00 268,750.63 268,750.63
04/02/21
04/06/21
US TREASURY NOTES
9128286H8
3,000,000.00
3,065,039.06
4,259.51
3,069,298.57
(33,046.88)
1,918.09
FIFO
DTD 03/15/2019 2.375% 03/15/2022
04/13/21
04/19/21
US TREASURY NOTES
9128286H8
815,000.00
832,032.23
1,840.95
833,873.18
(9,614.45)
534.29
FIFO
DTD 03/15/2019 2.375% 03/15/2022
04/13/21
04/20/21
US TREASURY NOTES
9128286H8
1,750,000.00
1,786,367.19
4,065.90
1,790,433.09
(20,849.60)
1,049.51
FIFO
DTD 03/15/2019 2.375% 03/15/2022
04/21/21
04/28/21
FANNIE MAE NOTES
3135G05G4
540,000.00
540,502.20
405.00
540,907.20
351.00
382.58
FIFO
DTD 07/10/2020 0.250% 07/10/2023
Transaction Type Sub -Total
6,105,000.00
6,223,940.68
10,571.36
6,234,512.04
(63,159.93)
3,884.47
Managed Account Sub -Total
159,151.38
278,953.14
438,104.52
(63,159.93)
3,884.47
Total Security Transactions
$159,151.38
$278,953.14
$438,104.52
($63,159.93)
$3,884.47
PFM Asset Management LLC Account 73340000 Page 21
Page 40
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Summary of Cash and Investments with Fiscal Agents
For the Month Ended
4/30/2021
Trustee and/or
Bond Issue/Description Paving Agent Account Name
Assessment District No 93-1 Wells Fargo Improvement Fund
Masi Plaza Reserve Fund
Redemp. Fund
CFD 2003-01 Improvement Area 1 (2013) Wells Fargo Reserve Fund
Agency Project
Cultural Center Fund
Bond Fund
Developer Project
Special Tax
CFD 2003-01 Improvement Area 2 (2013) Wells Fargo Bond Fund
Reserve Fund
Special Tax Fund
CFD No 2004-01 Rancho Etiwanda Series Wells Fargo Admin Expense Fund
Bond Fund
Reserve Fund
Special Tax Fund
Project Fund
2014 Rancho Summit Wells Fargo Cost of Issuance Fund
Bond Fund
Reserve Fund
Special Tax Fund
Rebate Fund
Redemption Fund
Prepayment Fund
2019 Lease Revenue Bonds Wells Fargo Bond Fund
Interest
Principal
Acquisition and Construciton - Series A
Acquisition and Construciton - Series B
Cost of Issuance
Page 1
Trust Account # Fund Investment
16913302
101
Money
Market Fund
16913301
841
Money
Market Fund
16913300
841
Money
Market Fund
46571801
865
Money
Market Fund
46571807
614
Money
Market Fund
46571808
615
Money
Market Fund
46571800
864
Money
Market Fund
46571806
614
Money
Market Fund
46571805
864
Money
Market Fund
46659800
866
Money
Market Fund
46659801
867
Money
Market Fund
46659805
866
Money
Market Fund
48436802
48436800
48436801
48436807
48436809
48709906
48709900
48709901
48709907
48709908
48709903
48709904
Money Market Fund
820 Money Market Fund
821 Money Market Fund
820 Money Market Fund
617 Money Market Fund
Money Market Fund
858 Money Market Fund
859 Money Market Fund
858 Money Market Fund
Money Market Fund
Money Market Fund
Money Market Fund
Purchase
Maturity
Cost
Date
Date*
Yield
Value
8/4/1997
N/A
0.01%
$
301,272 69
8/4/1997
N/A
0.01%
242,500 00
8/4/1997
N/A
0.01%
3027
$
543,802 96
9/1/2013
N/A
0.01%
$
1,417,022.91
9/1/2013
N/A
0.01%
77,80880
9/1/2013
N/A
0.01%
191,83685
9/1/2013
N/A
0.01%
1 39
9/1/2013
N/A
0.01%
98,088 84
9/1/2013
N/A
0.01%
77.15
$
1,784,835 94
12/1 /2013
N/A
0.01%
$
023
12/1/2013
N/A
0.01%
132,47585
12/1/2013
N/A
0.01%
723
$
132,483 31
N/A
0.01%
$
-
N/A
0.01%
266
N/A
0.01%
1,187,38520
N/A
64.73
N/A
44,979 23
$
1,232,43182
N/A
$
-
N/A
052
N/A
260,758.71
N/A
14.19
N/A
-
N/A
N/A
82631600
711
Money
Market Fund
2/28/2019
N/A
82631601
711
Money
Market Fund
2/28/2019
N/A
82631602
711
Money
Market Fund
2/2812019
N/A
82631605
711
Money
Market Fund
2/28/2019
N/A
82631606
711
Money
Market Fund
2/28/2019
N/A
82631607
711
Money
Market Fund
2/2812019
N/A
$ 000
254,915 63
425,000 08
7,771,925.48
2,294,149.49
Page 41
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Summary of Cash and Investments with Fiscal Agents
For the Month Ended
4/30/2021
Trustee and/or
Bond Issue/Description Paving Agent Account Name
Escrow Acct - Day Creek Villas Sr. Affordable Housing Chase Bank City of Rancho Cucamonga
CFD No. 2000-01 South Etiwanda
CFD No. 2000-02 Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park
CFD No. 2001-01 IA 1&2, Series A
CFD No. 2001-01 IA3, Series B
CFD No. 2006-01 Vintner's Grove
Union Bank Rancho Cucamonga 2015 CFD2000-1 AGY
Special Tax Fund
Bond Fund
Prepayment Fund
Reserve Fund
Union Bank Rancho Cucamonga 2015 CFD2000-2 AGY
Special Tax Fund
Bond Fund
Prepayment Fund
Reserve Fund
Union Bank Rancho Cucamonga 2015 CFD2001-1 AGY
Special Tax Fund
Bond Fund
Prepayment Fund
Reserve Fund
Union Bank Rancho Cucamonga 2015 CFD2001-1 AGY
Special Tax Fund
Bond Fund
Prepayment Fund
Reserve Fund
Union Bank Rancho Cucamonga 2015 CFD2006-1 AGY
Special Tax Fund
Bond Fund
Prepayment Fund
Reserve Fund
Page 2
Purchase
Maturity
Cost
Trust Account #
Fund
Investment
Date
Date*
Yield
Value
$
10,745,990
68
389918209
396
Money
Market Fund
4/24/2019
N/A
$
3,523,072
65
$
3,523,072
65
6712140200
7/30/2015
N/A
$
-
6712140201
Money
Market Fund
7/30/2015
N/A
6712140202
852
Money
Market Fund
7/30/2015
N/A
6712140203
Money
Market Fund
7/30/2015
N/A
-
6712140204
853
Money
Market Fund
7/3012015
N/A
0.00%
22,751
60
$
22,751
60
6712140300
Money
Market Fund
7/30/2015
N/A
$
-
6712140301
Money
Market Fund
7/30/2015
N/A
$
002
6712140302
856
Money
Market Fund
7/30/2015
N/A
$
034
6712140303
Money
Market Fund
7/30/2015
N/A
$
-
6712140304
857
Money
Market Fund
7/30/2015
N/A
0.00 %
208,911
61
$
208,91197
6712140400
Money
Market Fund
7/30/2015
N/A
$
-
6712140401
Money
Market Fund
7/30/2015
N/A
007
6712140402
860
Money
Market Fund
7/30/2015
N/A
1.19
6712140403
Money
Market Fund
7/30/2015
N/A
-
6712140404
861
Money
Market Fund
7/30/2015
N/A
0.00 %
303,555
53
$
303,556.79
6712140500
Money
Market Fund
7/30/2015
N/A
$
-
6712140501
Money
Market Fund
7/30/2015
N/A
0
01
6712140502
862
Money
Market Fund
7/30/2015
N/A
023
6712140503
Money
Market Fund
7/30/2015
N/A
-
6712140504
863
Money
Market Fund
7/30/2015
N/A
0.00 %
29,472
29
$
29,472
53
6712140600
Money
Market Fund
7/30/2015
N/A
$
-
6712140601
Money
Market Fund
7/30/2015
N/A
004
6712140602
869
Money
Market Fund
7/30/2015
N/A
068
6712140603
Money
Market Fund
7/30/2015
N/A
-
6712140604
870
Money
Market Fund
7/30/2015
N/A
0.00 %
130,766.12
$
130,766
84
Page 42
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Summary of Cash and Investments with Fiscal Agents
For the Month Ended
4/30/2021
Trustee and/or
Purchase
Maturity
Cost
Bond Issue/Description Paving Agent Account Name
Trust Account #
Fund Investment
Date
Date*
Yield
Value
CFD No. 2006-02 Amador on Rt. 66 Union Bank Rancho Cucamonga 2015 CFD2006-2 AGY
6712140700
Money Market Fund
7/30/2015
N/A
$
-
Special Tax Fund
6712140701
Money Market Fund
7/3012015
N/A
002
Bond Fund
6712140702
871 Money Market Fund
7/30/2015
N/A
0 51
Prepayment Fund
6712140703
Money Market Fund
7/30/2015
N/A
-
Reserve Fund
6712140704
872 Money Market Fund
7/30/2015
N/A
0.00 %
79,469 33
$
79,469 86
18,998,320 37
TOTAL CASH AND INVESTMENTS WITH FISCAL AGENTS
$
18,998,320.37
Note: These investments are money market accounts which have no stated maturity date as they may be liquidated upon demand.
Page 3
Page 43
Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District
Portfolio Summary
RANCHO April 30, 2021
CUCAMONGA
Cash Dividends Closing
Portfolio Holdings and Income Market Value
PFM Managed Account
State Pool
Passbook/Checking Accounts
Total
$ 208.09
$ 208.09
$ 5,014,903.72
68,915,564.55
362,855.76
$ 74,293,324.03
I certify that this report accurately reflects all District pooled investments and is in conformity with the investment
policy adopted November 18, 2020. A copy of the investment policy is available in the Finance Department. The
Investment Program herein shown provides sufficient cash flow liquidity to meet the next six months' estimated
expenditures.
Lori E. Sassoon,'easurer
Date
ATTARJA SPENT 2
0 PfM
Managed Account Summary Statement
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIST - 73340100
Opening Market Value $5,019,687.23
Maturities/Calls
0.00
Principal Dispositions
0.00
Principal Acquisitions
0.00
Unsettled Trades
0.00
Change in Current Value
(4,783.51)
Closing Market Value $5,014,903.72
Interest/Dividends/Coupons Received 208.09
Less Purchased Interest Related to Interest/Coupons 0.00
Plus Net Realized Gains/Losses 0.00
Total Cash Basis Earninas $208.09
Ending Amortized Value of Securities
4,989,599.12
Ending Accrued Interest
28,257.61
Plus Proceeds from Sales
0.00
Plus Proceeds of Maturities/Calls/Principal Payments
0.00
Plus Coupons/Dividends Received
208.09
Less Cost of New Purchases
0.00
Less Beginning Amortized Value of Securities
(4,989,566.27)
Less Beginning Accrued Interest
(22,330.99)
Total Accrual Basis Earnings $6,167.56
PFM Asset Management LLC
For the Month Ending April 30, 2021
Maturities/Calls
0.00
Sale Proceeds
0.00
Coupon/Interest/Dividend Income
208.09
Principal Payments
0.00
Security Purchases
0.00
Net Cash Contribution
(208.09)
Reconciling Transactions
0.00
Closing Cash Balance $0.00
Account 73340100 Page 1
Page 45
0 pfm
Portfolio Summary and Statistics For the Month Ending April 30, zozl
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIST - 73340100
Account summary sector Allocation
Description
Par Value
Market Value
Percent
Federal Agency Bond / Note
4,S ,000.00
4,525,220.50
90.24
Certificate of Deposit - FDIC Insured
490,000M0
489,683.22
9.76
Managed Account Sub -Total
4,990,000.00
5,014,903.72
100.Oo
Amrued Interest
28,257.61
Total Portfolio
4,990,000.00
5,043,161.33
Unsettled Trades
0.00
0.00
Fed Any Band /
Note
W.24%
Cent of Oepa -
FOIC
9.76%
Yield to Maturity at Cost 1.49%
Yield to Maturity at Market 0.17%
Weighted Average Days to Maturity 245
n-fi MmtM 6 12 MonNs 1-2Y®m 2-3Y®m 3-4 Years 4-5Yeam 0u 5ymm
PFM Asset Management LLC M nt 73340100 Page
Page 46
0 pfm
Managed Account Issuer Summary For the Month Ending April 30, zozl
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIST - 73340100
Issuer Surrunary Credit Quality (S&P Ratings)
Issuer
Market Value
of HoldiMs
Percent
ENERBANK USA
245,355.74
4.89
FANNIE MAE
1,504,864.50
30.01
FEDERAL FARM CREDIT HONKS
1,018,326.00
20.31
FREDDIE MAC
2,002,030A0
39.92
MEDALLIM BANK UEAH
244,327.48
4.87
Total $5,014,903.72 1W.W%
PFM Asset Management LLC Account 73340100 Page 3
Page 47
0 PfM
Managed Account Detail of Securities Held For the Month Ending April 30, 2021
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIST - 73340100
Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Trade Settle Original YTM Accrued Amortized Market
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value
Federal Agency Bond / Note
FREDDIE MAC NOTES 3134G9PV3 2,000,000.00 AA+ Aaa 05/27/16 05/27/16 2,000,000.00 1.55 13,261.11 2,000,000.00 2,002,030.00
DTD 05/27/2016 1.550% 05/27/2021
FANNIE MAE NOTES 3136G3H65 1,500,000.00 AA+ Aaa 07/28/16 07/28/16 1,500,000.00 1.40 5,425.00 1,500,000.00 1,504,864.50
DTD 07/28/2016 1.400% 07/28/2021
FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK NOTES 3133EHHH9 1,000,000.00 AA+ Aaa 05/02/17 05/02/17 998,000.00 1.96 9,546.67 999,599.12 1,018,326.00
DTD 05/02/2017 1.920% 05/02/2022
Security Type Sub -Total 4,500,000.00 4,498,000.00 1.59 28,232.78 4,499,599.12 4,525,220.50
DepositCertificate of
ENERBANK USA 29278TOD5 245,000.00 NR NR 07/24/20 07/24/20 245,000.00 0.45 21.14 245,000.00 245,355.74
DTD 07/24/2020 0.450% 07/24/2024
MEDALLION BANK UTAH 58404DHO7 245,000.00 NR NR 07/30/20 07/30/20 245,000.00 0.55 3.69 245,000.00 244,327.48
DTD 07/30/2020 0.550% 07/30/2025
Security Type Sub -Total 490,000.00 490,000.00 0.50 24.83 490,000.00 489,683.22
Managed Account Sub -Total 4,990,000.00 4,988,000.00 1.49 28,257.61 4,989,599.12 5,014,903.72
Securities Sub -Total $4,990,000.00 $4,988,000.00 1.49% $28,257.61 $4,989,599.12 $5,014,903.72
Accrued Interest $28,257.61
Total Investments 5,043,161.33
PFM Asset Management LLC Account 73340100 Page 4
Page 48
0 PfM
Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics For the Month Ending April 30, 2021
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIST - 73340100
Security Type/Description Next Call Market Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/L Effective YTM
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par Broker Date Price Value On Cost Amort Cost Duration at Mkt
FREDDIE MAC NOTES 3134G9PV3 2,000,000.00 NEW ACC 100.10 2,002,030.00 2,030.00 2,030.00 0.08 0.20
DTD 05/27/2016 1.550% 05/27/2021
FANNIE MAE NOTES 3136G3H65 1,500,000.00 NEW ACC 100.32 1,504,864.50 4,864.50 4,864.50 0.24 0.07
DTD 07/28/2016 1.400% 07/28/2021
FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK NOTES 3133EHHH9 1,000,000.00 NEW ACC 101.83 1,018,326.00 20,326.00 18,726.88 0.99 0.10
DTD 05/02/2017 1.920% 05/02/2022
Security Type Sub -Total 4,500,000.00 4,525,220.50 27,220.50 25,621.38 0.34 0.13
ENERBANK USA 29278TOD5 245,000.00 NEW ACC 100.15 245,355.74 355.74 355.74 3.21 0.40
DTD 07/24/2020 0.450% 07/24/2024
MEDALLION BANK UTAH 58404DHO7 245,000.00 NEW ACC 99.73 244,327.48 (672.52) (672.52) 4.20 0.62
DTD 07/30/2020 0.550% 07/30/2025
Security Type Sub -Total 490,000.00 489,683.22 (316.78) (316.78) 3.70 0.51
Managed Account Sub -Total 4,990,000.00 5,014,903.72 26,903.72 25,304.60 0.67 0.17
Securities Sub -Total
Accrued Interest
Total Investments
PFM Asset Management LLC
$4,990,000.00
$5,014,903.72 $26,903.72
$28,257.61
$5,043,161.33
$25,304.60 0.67 0.17%
Account 73340100 Page 5
Page 49
0 Pfm
Managed Account Security Transactions & Interest
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIST - 73340100
Transaction Type Principal Accrued
Trade Settle Security Description CUSIP Par Proceeds Interest Total
04/24/21 04/24/21 ENERBANK USA 29278TOD5 245,000.00 0.00 93.64 93.64
DTD 07/24/2020 0.450% 07/24/2024
04/30/21 04/30/21 MEDALLION BANK UTAH 58404DHO7 245,000.00 0.00 114.45 114.45
DTD 07/30/2020 0.550% 07/30/2025
Transaction Type Sub -Total 490,000.00 0.00 208.09 208.09
Managed Account Sub -Total 0.00 208.09 208.09
Total Security Transactions
$0.00 $208.09
$208.09
For the Month Ending April 30, 2021
Realized GIL Realized GIL Sale
Cost Amort Cost Method
PFM Asset Management LLC Account 73340100 Page 6
Page 50
DATE:
May 19, 2021
TO:
Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:
John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY:
Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer
Ian W. Tai, Assistant Engineer
SUBJECT:
Consideration to Approve the First Amendment to the Memorandum of
Understanding for Cooperative Planning and Development of the San
Sevaine Trail in San Bernardino County. (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the First Amendment to the Memorandum of
Understanding for Cooperative Planning and Development of the San Sevaine Trail in San
Bernardino County (Amendment), amending a previously approved Memorandum of
Understanding (MOU) between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the City of Fontana for the
San Sevaine Trail project.
BACKGROUND:
In 2015, the City of Fontana applied for and received two grants for the design and construction
of the San Sevaine Trail Project, which is primarily located within the City of Rancho Cucamonga
city limits. The San Sevaine Trail Project proposes to construct a 1.25 mile multi -use trail
beginning at the trail entrance where the Pacific Electric Trail meets the existing Etiwanda Creek
Channel just east of the 1-15 Freeway in the City of Fontana. This new segment will start at the
Pacific Electric Trail in the City of Fontana and extend through the City of Rancho Cucamonga
ending at Banyan Street. The trail segment will run north and south along the Etiwanda Creek
Channel and provide a healthy, scenic, and recreation alternative for pedestrians and bicyclists.
A Vicinity Map is included as Attachment 1.
Thus far, the project has involved the City of Rancho Cucamonga, the City of Fontana, the San
Bernardino County Flood Control District (SBCFCD), private parties, and multiple agreements
and MOUs have been executed between various combinations of these parties over time. This
Amendment pertains to the original MOU, executed on February 1, 2017 between the City of
Rancho Cucamonga and the City of Fontana which outlines responsibilities of each party to
complete the Trail project.
ANALYSIS:
While the majority of this portion the San Sevaine Trail Project lies within the city limits of Rancho
Cucamonga, the City of Fontana is serving as the lead agency for this project and is responsible
for the design and construction of the Trail. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has agreed to provide
design review and technical assistance as well as construction inspection once the project is
underway.
Page 51
It has recently come to the attention of the City of Fontana that a portion of the Trail design falls
within private property. Therefore, an additional easement is needed for purposes of trail use and
maintenance. This Amendment outlines the right-of-way tasks in efforts to obtain this easement
and defines roles and responsibilities of each party (see Exhibit "C" of the amendment). It should
also be noted that nothing in this amendment constitutes a precommitment by the Parties to
condemn the Easement.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The San Sevaine Trail Project will add approximately 1.25 miles of a multi -use trail into the City's
trails network requiring routine maintenance for striping and signs. The City of Fontana was
awarded over $5.9 million in grant funding from the State of California and the South Coast Air
Quality Management District to design and construct the proposed multi -use trail improvements.
Presently, the City has not identified a funding source to pay for future trail maintenance.
Engineering staff anticipates returning to the City Council prior to the City of Fontana awarding a
construction contract to identify a funding source.
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:
This item addresses the City Council's vision for the City to build upon our success as a world
class community, to create an equitable, sustainable, and vibrant city, rich in opportunity for all to
thrive by expanding the City's multi -use trail network.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 - Vicinity Map
Attachment 2 - Amendment No. 1
Page 2
Page 52
SAN SEVAINE TRAIL PROJECT
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
I
Nesona S: Oeer Geek I i
I• Cheaper
I1} NIYUEe Rtl HIIISIes Fd Hdlyn - I i
ih«ouRAbretl`} Mason Ave I I _ "7
conay xhwal •mod, Project Site
•\ Banyan St Banyan St
LeTen Aw q Lemon Aw
•\ N A101nmd W a
Arm lama /
„ neana 5t GrepNentl _ Erman•
Cc�ecIhne •1 haaa Una Rd g a
�y
iMh S[ • 1/
J F=
c
eRancho
v < a cucamonya n"
rew H.ry a > Arrow Pre know ale
9th Bt m a • a u m Na Ser
North lersevBroe ddhlvynAva
B for Se _.._••`Bone [uramnnga ..I
flip sl
p_ ffith 5t •, S Uhy
s L >
•�.._.. _.. _.
R�. ...... ..d. - •Fw•� —.. J Bm Bernardino Ave
Project Site ® A
N
A,TjA HMENT1
FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING FOR
COOPERATIVE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE SAN SEVAINE TRAIL IN
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
This First Amendment to the Memorandum of Understanding for Cooperative Planning
and Development of the San Sevaine Trail in San Bernardino County ("First
Amendment"), is effective as of 2021 ("Effective Date")
and is between the City of Fontana, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of
the State of California ("Fontana"), on the one hand, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
amunicipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of California ("Rancho
Cucamonga"), on the other hand. Fontana and Rancho Cucamonga may be referred to
collectively as "Parties" or individually as "Party'.
A. The Parties entered into the Memorandum of Understanding for
Cooperative Planning and Development of the San Sevaine Trail in San Bernardino
County ("MOU") dated February 1, 2017, whereby the Parties agreed to work
cooperatively to complete Phase 1, Segment 2 of the San Sevaine Trail ("Trail") from
the Pacific Electric Trail to Banyan Street in San Bernardino County, within the Citiesof
Fontana and Rancho Cucamonga (the "Project"), as more fully set out therein; and
B. There is a portion of the Project area, as described and set out further in
Exhibit "A" (the "Easement Area"), that is privately owned but fully burdened by an
easement granted to the San Bernardino County Flood Control District ("SBCFCD"); and
C. The Parties have determined that an additional easement is needed over
the Easement Area within the City of Rancho Cucamonga in furtherance of the Project
and for the purpose of the Trail's use and maintenance, but the SBCFCD has declined to
amend its existing easement over the Easement Area as the Trail serves no purpose for
the operation or maintenance of their facility; and
D. Public entities may acquire property rights necessary forthe implementation
of public projects, such as the Trail.
E. The Parties now desire to amend the MOU to set forth the Parties'
responsibility for the acquisition of an easement for purposes of trail use and maintenance
over the Easement Area as described and set out further in Exhibit "A" and shown on the
plat in Exhibit "B" (the "Easement").
NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties agree as follows:
1. Recitals. The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated
herein, in their entirety, by this reference.
2. Addition of Section XXVII to MOU. A new section XXVII is hereby
ATTACHMENT 2
Page i of 9 Page 54
added to the MOU as follows:
"XXVII Easement Acquisition
A. Rancho Cucamonga shall serve as the acquiring agency for the
purposes of right-of-way acquisition for the Project and is anticipated to
accept title to the Easement upon completion of the right-of-way acquisition
process.
B. Roles and responsibilities assigned to each Party under this MOU
are described in Exhibit "C' and incorporated herein. As stated in Exhibit
"C", Rancho Cucamonga shall serve as the lead agency for purposes of
acquiring the Easement through eminent domain, and Fontana shall serve
as the reviewing agency in support of Rancho Cucamonga for purposes of
those tasks.
C. The Parties shall discharge their roles and responsibilities in good
faith to obtain the Easement.
D. The Parties shall mutually be responsible for ensuring compliance
with all applicable state and federal laws relating to the acquisition of the
Easement.
E. Fontana shall be responsible for one hundred percent (100%) of
the cost of the acquisition of the Easement including reimbursing Rancho
Cucamonga for its costs incurred in the right-of-way process, including all
expert and legal costs incurred by Rancho Cucamonga in connection with
the acquisition of the Easement, except that Rancho Cucamonga shall be
responsible for the cost of the first 200 hours of staff time incurred by City
employees. Fontana shall pay all such reimbursement amounts to Rancho
Cucamonga within thirty (30) days of receipt of an invoice documenting the
type and amount of such services or in a manner otherwise agreed to by
the Parties.
F. Nothing herein shall be construed to direct, limit, or constrain,
Rancho Cucamonga's discretion in adopting a resolution of necessity
regarding the acquisition of the Easement, if deemed necessary by Rancho
Cucamonga in its sole discretion. Further, nothing herein shall constitute a
precommitment by the Parties to condemn the Easement. No decision to
exercise the power of eminent domain has been made by the Parties.
3. Other Terms and Conditions of the MOU. All other terms and conditions of
the MOU not amended by this First Amendment remain in full force andeffect.
4. Counterparts. This First Amendment may be executed in two or more
counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which togethershall
Page 2 of 9 Page 55
constitute one and the same instrument.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused this First Amendment
to be executed by their duly authorized representatives and affixed as of the date of
signature of the Parties:
[SIGNATURE AND EXHIBIT PAGES FOLLOW]
Page 3 of 9 Page 56
CITY OF FONTANA
0
Mark Denny, City Manager
ATTEST:
By: Date:
onia Lewis, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
La
Ruben Duran, City Attorney
Page 4 of 9 Page 57
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
0
John R. Gillison, City Manager
ATTEST:
By: Date:
Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
0
James L. Markman, City Attorney
Page 5 of 9 Page 58
EXHIBIT "A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
That portion of Lot A of Tract No. 16302, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San
Bernardino, State of California, recorded May 16, 2003 as Document No. 2003-0327765, in
Book 292 pages 28-30 of Tract Maps, Official Records of said County, more particularly
described as follows:
Commencing at the northwest comer of said Lot A;
Thence along the northerly line of said Lot A, North 89041'26" East a distance of 35.90 feet,
more or less, to the top of the westerly side of the Etiwanda Channel shown on said Tract No.
16302, as currently constructed by the San Bernardino County Flood Control Districk and the
TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
Thence along said top of westerly side of the Etiwanda Channel, South 00045' 53" West a
distance of 721.94 feet to the southerly boundary line of said Lot A;
Thence along said southerly boundary line, South 89058' 10" West a distance of 18.00 feet to a
line parallel with and 18.00 feet distant from said top of the westerly side of the Etiwanda
Channel;
Thence along said parallel line, North 00045'53" East a distance of 360.95 feet;
Thence North 01'01'42" East a distance of 63.92 feet to a line parallel with and 20.00 feet
distant from said top of the westerly side of the Etiwanda Channel;
Thence along said parallel line, North 00045'53" East a distance of 262.08 feet to the beginning
of a 192.00 feet radius curve, concave southwesterly;
Thence northwesterly along said curve through a central angle of 10°27' 18" anarc distance of
35.04 feet to said northerly line of Lot A;
Page 6 of 9 Page 59
Thence along said northerly line, North 89041'26" East a distance of 23.19 feet to the TRUE
POINT OF BEGINNING.
Containing: 13,689 sq.ft. or 0.314 acres of land, (more or less).
As shown on Exhibit `B" attached hereto and made a part hereof.
This real property description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance
with the Professional Land Surveyors Act.
N f
! m
Eok
VdLly�y 2-1-2021
hn C. Bentley, P.L.S. 2 3 Date
t
Page 7 of 9 Page 60
EXHIBIT "B"
Curve Table
Curie #
Radius
Delta Length
CI
19200'
1027980 35.04'
POC L
LIOB Table
105.00' 1 82.20'
CT
Line /
Length
Direction
ti
-0 11 I
L1
35.90'
N89041'26"E
z
12
L2
721.94'
S00'45'53"W
N89041'24"E
L3
18.00'
S893890•W
f0762.00'
16�pry ,
L4
360.95'
N00045530E
w _—__—
at
gyp'
L5
63.92'
N01'01'42"W
N o
v
13
9
L6
262.08'
N00'45'53"E
o `�
G� —
'(8
LU
a
14
L7
23.19'
N8941'26"E
8
330.00'
N89'41'26"E
V89'41'30"E
W
16B.00'
15
1 7
16 In
2 6
9ti
�"
-- --T---
z
17
lei
°
D
------
3 4 1 5
18
I I
Y
LOT A
TOP OF
ST SIDE
OF
-3 0
151.4T o
a
113.89'
23
1
I 22 21 20 19 1 LOT B
1
SB9435'59"W 660.01'
ABBREVIATION
aA�
LA11p S
C/L
CENTERLINE
LEGEND
S.F.
SQUARE FEET
EASEMENT AREA 313,689 S.F.
�/-
POC
POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
TPOB
TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING
AFFECTED LOT
<m
0
75 150 300
« No.
C ►3
7223
1 2_1.2021
HN C. BENTLEY. 7223 'tTFOF CpL1iaR`'\
ATE PREPARED: 12/18/2020
cxe
DAVID EVANS
EXHIBIT"B"
7M BERNARDINO
RANCHO CUCAMONG
,CBE
w %ASSOCIATESi1
Easement
„„a„
a ZBE
IF
4141 E InWIxl Ernum Bla., Sufle
omano Caiaoma 917M
.o. FONr-BBs3
EXHIBIT
ovB11z1
Bmre_ s094 157M
EXHIBIT "C"
Roles and Responsibilities
Right -of -Way Tasks
Lead
Agency
Reviewing
Agency
Preparation of Legal Descriptions and Plats
COF
RC
Preparation and Issuance of Notice to Appraise'
COF
RC
Preparation of Appraisal
COF
RC
Setting of Just Compensation and Negotiating
Author
RC
COF
Tendering of Offers on Behalf of Rancho Cucamonga'
COF
RC
Negotiation of Terms of Purchase and Sale3
COF
RC
Approval of Purchase and Sale Agreement
COF/RC
N/A
Escrow Management
COF
RC
Hearing and Adoption of Resolutions of Necessity4
RC
COF
Litigation of Eminent Domain Lawsuit
RC
COF
Motions for Immediate Possession, Settlement and
Stipulated Judgment, or Final Orders of Condemnation
RC
COF
RC = City of Rancho Cucamonga I COF = City of Fontana I N/A = Not Applicable
' Notice to Appraise shall include a cover letter on Rancho Cucamonga letterhead
explaining the relationship under this MOU. Offer letters shall be prepared on City of
Rancho Cucamonga letterhead.
2 Just compensation shall be considered and recommended in closed session by the City
Council of Fontana and reviewed for ratification in closed session by the City Council of
Rancho Cucamonga.
3 The final form of the purchase and sale agreement shall be a three -party agreement
between the Rancho Cucamonga, Fontana, and the property owner(s).
4 Fontana staff shall participate jointly with Rancho Cucamonga staff in the presentation
of the staff report during hearing(s) for consideration of Resolution(s) of Necessity.
Page 9 of 9 Page 62
DATE:
May 19, 2021
TO:
Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:
John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY:
Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer
Justine Garcia, Deputy Director of Engineering Services
SUBJECT:
Consideration of Memorandum's of Understanding (MOU's) between the
Alta Loma, Central and Etiwanda School Districts and the City to Establish
Cost -Sharing for the Provision of Crossing Guard Services. (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council approve MOU's between the Alta Loma School District
(ALSO), Central School District (CSD) and Etiwanda School District (ESD) and the City to
establish cost -sharing for the provision of crossing guard services to accommodate hybrid model
school schedules for each District through May 2021, the end of the 2020/2021 school year.
BACKGROUND:
Each year the City provides crossing guard services at warranted and approved locations through
a contract with All City Management. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic and schools shifting to
100% virtual learning for the 2020-2021 school year, the City suspended crossing guard services
at all locations until further notice and direction was received from the School Districts regarding
their return to in -person learning.
ANALYSIS:
In late February2021, Citystaff were notified by ALSD, CSD and ESD that they would be opening
their school campuses for in -person learning starting as early as March 15r . Due to continuing
COVID-19 regulations, School Districts developed hybrid school schedules to stagger the number
of students present on campus at any one time. Resolution No. 2021-013 was approved by the
City Council at the March 3, 2021 meeting, setting revised policy for the provision of crossing
guard services to specifically address the remainder of fiscal year 2020-2021, including outlining
a cost sharing option for any additionally provided services to accommodate the new hybrid
schedules.
Over a two week timeframe staff coordinated with both All City Management and each School
District to confirm hybrid schedules, outline options for paymentfor services provided, and to most
importantly ensure all warranted locations were staffed with guards by each school's start date.
Each School District ultimately decided that a cost sharing agreement would be the preferred
course of action to address payment for additional services provided for hybrid schedules.
MOU's were developed for each District outlining each parties' obligations and payment terms,
including Exhibit A which provides a list of currently staffed locations and the anticipated costs
Page 63
associated with the provision of service, provided by All City Management. The parties have
agreed that the City will pay for the traditionally provided 3 hours of crossing guard services per
location per day, and any additional hours will be paid for by the respective District. All three
MOU's have been, presented to and approved and executed by each District's Board of Directors.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Expenditures for the Crossing Guard Contract have been included in the FY20/21 Annual Budget
under Account No. 1018701-5300 (Traffic Safety Contract Services). Due to the suspension of
services for most of the school year, annual expenditures for crossing guard services are
anticipated to be $92,450 for the remainder of the fiscal year with a total revenue of $42,966
coming from the School District cost sharing agreements. Both expenditures and revenue have
been included in the Amended FY 20/21 Appropriations.
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:
This item addresses the City Council's vision to build on our success as a world class community
by continuing to provide a financially sustainable citywide Crossing Guard Program.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 — MOU Between Alta Loma School District and the City
Attachment 2 — MOU Between Central School District and the City
Attachment 3 — MOU Between Etiwanda School District and the City
Page 2
Page 64
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
BETWEEN
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE ALTA LOMA SCHOOL DISTRICT
This Memorandum of Understanding, dated (the "MOU") is made by and among the City
of Rancho Cucamonga, a California municipal corporation (the "City"), and the Alta Loma School District,
a California school district (the "District"), collectively referred to herein as the "Parties".
A. RECITALS
(i) The purpose of this MOU is to clarify and formalize a shared cost agreement between the
City and the District for crossing guard services to be provided for the re -opening of schools beginning
March 15, 2021 and through May 26, 2021, the end of the District's 2020/21 academic school year.
(ii) Due to the COVID-19 pandemic and requirements for distancing, the District has provided
an atypical hybrid schedule, which will result in the need for additional hours of crossing guard services
to be requested of the City's crossing guard contractor, All City Management Services, Incorporated.
(iii) The City's purpose in funding the crossing guard services is to improve public safety by
protecting persons who are crossing the street or highway in the vicinity of a school at locations identified
by the City Engineer for City -funded crossing guards.
(iv) The City Engineer annually initiates a crossing guard study to evaluate school crossing,
including those served by crossing guards and locations identified through District and City discussions.
Based on the most recent crossing guard study, recommendations to the City Council were made as a part
of the City's 2020/21 fiscal year budget adoption process.
(v) For the remainder of the District's 2020/21 academic school year, in order to meet the
expedited reopening process, the City Council delegated to the City Manager the ability to approve the
City Engineer recommended locations for crossing guard services.
B. AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties hereto agree as follows:
reference.
Recitals Incorporated. The foregoing recitals are incorporated in this MOU by this
Party Obligations.
(i) City Obligations. At its own expense, the City shall provide crossing guards at each location
approved by the City Engineer for crossing guard services and identified in Exhibit "A" through May 25,
2021. The City Engineer will provide District with a description of the approved locations. The level of
service, including the number of crossing guards at each location, shall be determined at the City's sole
discretion.
Page 1 of 5 ATTAEMAT 1
(ii) District Obligations. Through May 25, 2021, District may request additional crossing guard
services at approved locations for additional shifts or hours (the "Additional Services"). District shall
provide such requests for Additional Services to City in writing at least 21 days in advance of the District's
desired date of the Additional Services. All Additional Services shall be paid for by District in accordance
with Section 3 and as identified in the "Client Worksheet" included in Exhibit "A".
3. Payment Terms
(a) District shall reimburse City for the Additional Services in accordance with the rates and
terms provided by City's contractor, All City Management Services, attached hereto as Exhibit "B." District
acknowledges that each one -hour shift may result in a charge in excess of one hour under City's contract
with All City Management Services. By way of example only, two (2) 1-hour shifts results in a charge for
three (3) hours.
(b) The City will send the District invoices every two -weeks ("Biweekly Invoice") for the
Additional Services. The Biweekly Invoice will list the expenses paid by the City on behalf of the District
for the Additional Services and will include:
1. Copies of invoices paid by the City.
2. A calculation of the hours paid ('by Site #, Location of the Intersection, and service
dates' or 'in total') by the City on behalf of the District according to Section 2. Party Obligations at the rate
per hour paid by the City.
(c) The District will reimburse the City within 30 days following the date of the Biweekly
Invoice. The District should address all reimbursement of expenses to:
City of Rancho Cucamonga
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739
Attention: Finance Department, Accounts Receivable
4. Term
The term of this MOU will commence on the date first written above and terminate after all
required reimbursements to the City have been made.
S. Miscellaneous Provisions
(a) Notice. All notices herein provided to be given, or which may be given, by either Party to
the other, shall be deemed to have been fully given when made in writing and received by the Parties at
their respective addresses:
ALTA LOMA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Attention:
Phone Number:
Email:
Address:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Attention: John Gillison
Phone Number: 909-477-2700
Email: john.gillison@cityofrc.us
Address: 10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Page 2 of 5
Page 66
(b) Amendment and Waiver. This MOU may not be amended or modified, nor may any
of its terms be waived, except by written instruments signed by the Parties, and no verbal understanding
or agreement not incorporated herein shall be binding on any Party hereto. Each waiver or consent under
any provisions hereof shall be effective only in the specific instances for which given.
(d) Severability. If any provision of this MOU shall be held illegal, invalid, or
unenforceable, in whole or in part, the legality, validity, and enforceability of the remaining provisions
shall not be affected thereby.
(e) Governing law. This MOU shall be governed by and construed in accordance with
the laws of the State of California without reference to conflicts of law rules. Venue for all disputes shall
be proper in the Superior Court of San Bernardino County.
(f)
a factor.
Time of Essence
Time is of the essence for every provision hereof in which time is
(g) Counterparts and Facsimile. This MOU may be executed by the Parties in
counterparts, which counterparts shall be construed together and have the same effect as if all the Parties
had executed the same instrument. Counterpart signatures may be transmitted by facsimile, email, or
other electronic means and have the same force and effect as if they were original signatures. All Parties
have participated in the drafting of this MOU.
(h) Benefit of the Parties. The terms of this MOU shall be binding and inure to the benefit
of the Parties hereto and their successors and assigns. No Party shall assign this MOU or any portion
thereof to a third party without the prior consent of the other Party. Any such assignment without prior
written consent by one Party shall give the other Party the right to automatically and immediately
terminate this MOU with respect to the other Party making the unauthorized assignment without advance
notice.
(i) Entire Agreement of the Parties. This MOU supersedes any and all agreements,
either oral or written, between the Parties with respect to the subject matter of this MOU and contains
all of the representations, covenants, and agreements between the Parties with respect to the subject
matter of this MOU.
(j) Attorney's Fees. In the event that either Party commences any legal action or
proceeding to enforce or interpret the provisions of this MOU, the prevailing party in such action shall be
entitled to reasonable attorney's fees, costs and necessary disbursements, in addition to such other relief
as may be sought and awarded.
(k) Independent Counsel. Each Party has had the opportunity to consult with its own
attorney with respect to this MOU, and in the event that any language contained herein is construed to
be vague or ambiguous, this MOU shall not be strictly construed against any Party.
(1) Heading and Captions. The headings and captions used in this MOU are for convenience
only and shall in no way define, limit, or describe the scope or intent of the MOU or any part thereof.
In Witness Whereof, the Parties have caused this MOU to be executed as of the date first written above.
Page 3 of 5 Page 67
ALTA LOMA SCHOOL DISTRICT CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
NAME:
TITLE:
DATED:
W
NAME: L.Dennis Michael
TITLE: Mavor
DATED:
Page 4 of 5 Page 68
EXHIBIT A
Amethyst & La Grande (NW)
Hermosa & Wilson (SE)
Alta Loma Elementary
Hermosa Elementary
CLIENT WORKSHEET 2020 - 2C
Alta Loma SD
Alta Loma SD
Department: 3604
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Billing Rate for 2020/2021: $22.97 10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
KEY:
Traditional Calendar: Alta Loma SD
For sites with no regularly scheduled early release days, use 180 regular days
March 16, 2021 - March 29, 2021
6 5 $22.97 = $689.10
2 Sites at 3.0 hrs per day Total Hrs/day X days/yr X Hourly Billing Rate
Alta Loma ES and Hermosa ES - Traditional Hours
March 16, 2021 - March 29, 2021
F6 F5� F$22.97
2 Sites at 3.0 hrs Der day Total Hrs/dav X days/vr X Hourlv Billing Rate
Alta Loma ES and Hermosa ES - Additional Hours
March 30, 2021 - April 5, 2021
6 F 5 F$22.97= $689.10
2 Sites at 3.0 hrs per day Total Hrs/day X days/yr X Hourly Billing Rate
Alta Loma ES and Hermosa ES - Traditional Hours
March 30, 2021 - April 5, 2021
8
5
F$22.97 = $918.80
2 Sites at 4.0 hrs per day
Total Hrs/day
X days/yr X
Hourly Billing Rate
Alta Loma ES and Hermosa ES -
Additional Hours
April 6, 2021 - May 26, 2021
F6637
$22.97 = $5,099.34
2 Sites at 3.0 hrs per day
Total Hrs/day
X days/yr X
Hourly Billing Rate
Alta Loma ES and Hermosa ES - Traditional Hours
March 16, 2021 - March 29, 2021
10 F 37 F$22.97 1 $8,498.90
2 Sites at 5.0 hrs per day Total Hrs/day X days/yr X Hourly Billing Rate
Alta Loma ES and Hermosa ES - Additional Hours
TOTAL PROJECTED HOURS 722 TOTAL PROJECTED COST 3/15/21 to 5/26/21 $16,584.34
CITY PROJECTED COST 3/15/21 to 5/26/21 $6,477.54
SD PROJECTED COST 3/15/21 to 5/26/21 $10,106.80
Page 5 of 5 Page 69
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
BETWEEN
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT
This Memorandum of Understanding, dated (the "MOU") is made by and among the City
of Rancho Cucamonga, a California municipal corporation (the "City"), and the Central School District, a
California school district (the "District"), collectively referred to herein as the "Parties".
A. RECITALS
(i) The purpose of this MOU is to clarify and formalize a shared cost agreement between the
City and the District for crossing guard services to be provided for the re -opening of schools beginning
March 15, 2021 and through May 27, 2021, the end of the District's 2020/21 academic school year.
(ii) Due to the COVID-19 pandemic and requirements for distancing, the District has provided
an atypical hybrid schedule, which will result in the need for additional hours of crossing guard services
to be requested of the City's crossing guard contractor, All City Management Services, Incorporated.
(iii) The City's purpose in funding the crossing guard services is to improve public safety by
protecting persons who are crossing the street or highway in the vicinity of a school at locations identified
by the City Engineer for City -funded crossing guards.
(iv) The City Engineer annually initiates a crossing guard study to evaluate school crossing,
including those served by crossing guards and locations identified through District and City discussions.
Based on the most recent crossing guard study, recommendations to the City Council were made as a part
of the City's 2020/21 fiscal year budget adoption process.
(v) For the remainder of the District's 2020/21 academic school year, in order to meet the
expedited reopening process, the City Council delegated to the City Manager the ability to approve the
City Engineer recommended locations for crossing guard services.
B. AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties hereto agree as follows:
1. Recitals Incorporated. The foregoing recitals are incorporated in this MOU by this
reference.
2. Party Obligations.
(i) City Obligations. At its own expense, the City shall provide crossing guards at each location
approved by the City Engineer for crossing guard services and identified in Exhibit "A" through May 25,
2021. The City Engineer will provide District with a description of the approved locations. The level of
service, including the number of crossing guards at each location, shall be determined at the City's sole
discretion.
Page 1 of 5 ATTAEMAT 2
(ii) District Obligations. Through May 25, 2021, District may request additional crossing guard
services at approved locations for additional shifts or hours (the "Additional Services"). District shall
provide such requests for Additional Services to City in writing at least 21 days in advance of the District's
desired date of the Additional Services. All Additional Services shall be paid for by District in accordance
with Section 3 and as identified in the "Client Worksheet" included in Exhibit "A".
3. Payment Terms
(a) District shall reimburse City for the Additional Services in accordance with the rates and
terms provided by City's contractor, All City Management Services, attached hereto as Exhibit "A". District
acknowledges that each one -hour shift may result in a charge in excess of one hour under City's contract
with All City Management Services. By way of example only, two (2) 1-hour shifts results in a charge for
three (3) hours.
(b) The City will send the District invoices every two -weeks ("Biweekly Invoice") for the
Additional Services. The Biweekly Invoice will list the expenses paid by the City on behalf of the District
for the Additional Services and will include:
1. Copies of invoices paid by the City.
2. A calculation of the hours paid ('by Site #, Location of the Intersection, and service
dates' or 'in total') by the City on behalf of the District according to Section 2. Party Obligations at the rate
per hour paid by the City.
(c) The District will reimburse the City within 30 days following the date of the Biweekly
Invoice. The District should address all reimbursement of expenses to:
City of Rancho Cucamonga
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739
Attention: Finance Department, Accounts Receivable
4. Term
The term of this MOU will commence on the date first written above and terminate after all
required reimbursements to the City have been made.
5. Miscellaneous Provisions
(a) Notice. All notices herein provided to be given, or which may be given, by either Party to
the other, shall be deemed to have been fully given when made in writing and received by the Parties at
their respective addresses:
CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT
Attention:
Phone Number:
Email:
Address:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Attention: John Gillison
Phone Number: 909-477-2700
Email: john.gillison@cityofrc.us
Address: 10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Page 2 of 5
Page 71
(b) Amendment and Waiver. This MOU may not be amended or modified, nor may any
of its terms be waived, except by written instruments signed by the Parties, and no verbal understanding
or agreement not incorporated herein shall be binding on any Party hereto. Each waiver or consent under
any provisions hereof shall be effective only in the specific instances for which given.
(d) Severability. If any provision of this MOU shall be held illegal, invalid, or
unenforceable, in whole or in part, the legality, validity, and enforceability of the remaining provisions
shall not be affected thereby.
(e) Governing law. This MOU shall be governed by and construed in accordance with
the laws of the State of California without reference to conflicts of law rules. Venue for all disputes shall
be proper in the Superior Court of San Bernardino County.
(f)
a factor.
Time of Essence
Time is of the essence for every provision hereof in which time is
(g) Counterparts and Facsimile. This MOU may be executed by the Parties in
counterparts, which counterparts shall be construed together and have the same effect as if all the Parties
had executed the same instrument. Counterpart signatures may be transmitted by facsimile, email, or
other electronic means and have the same force and effect as if they were original signatures. All Parties
have participated in the drafting of this MOU.
(h) Benefit of the Parties. The terms of this MOU shall be binding and inure to the benefit
of the Parties hereto and their successors and assigns. No Party shall assign this MOU or any portion
thereof to a third party without the prior consent of the other Party. Any such assignment without prior
written consent by one Party shall give the other Party the right to automatically and immediately
terminate this MOU with respect to the other Party making the unauthorized assignment without advance
notice.
(i) Entire Agreement of the Parties. This MOU supersedes any and all agreements,
either oral or written, between the Parties with respect to the subject matter of this MOU and contains
all of the representations, covenants, and agreements between the Parties with respect to the subject
matter of this MOU.
(j) Attorney's Fees. In the event that either Party commences any legal action or
proceeding to enforce or interpret the provisions of this MOU, the prevailing party in such action shall be
entitled to reasonable attorney's fees, costs and necessary disbursements, in addition to such other relief
as may be sought and awarded.
(k) Independent Counsel. Each Party has had the opportunity to consult with its own
attorney with respect to this MOU, and in the event that any language contained herein is construed to
be vague or ambiguous, this MOU shall not be strictly construed against any Party.
(1) Heading and Captions. The headings and captions used in this MOU are for convenience
only and shall in no way define, limit, or describe the scope or intent of the MOU or any part thereof.
In Witness Whereof, the Parties have caused this MOU to be executed as of the date first written above.
Page 3 of 5 Page 72
CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
NAME:
TITLE:
DATED:
BY:
NAME: L.Dennis Michael
TITLE: Mayor
DATED:
Page 4 of 5 Page 73
EXHIBIT A
Department: 3604
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Billing Rate for 2020/2021: $22.97 10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
KEY:
Traditional Calendar: Central SD
For sites with no regularly scheduled early release days, use 180 regular days
April 6, 2021 - April 12, 2021
9 5 $22.97 = $1,033.65
3 Sites at 3.0 hrs per day Total Hrs/day X days/yr X Hourly Billing Rate
Coyote Canyon ES and Musser MS - Traditional Hours
April 6, 2021 - April 12, 2021
6 F 5 F$22.97 = $689.10
3 Sites at 2.0 hrs per day Total Hrs/day X days/yr X Hourly Billing Rate
Coyote Canyon ES and Musser MS - Additional Hours
April 13, 2021 - May 27, 2021
9 34 F$22.97 = $7,028.82
3 Sites at 3.0 hrs per day Total Hrs/day X days/yr X Hourly Billing Rate
Coyote Canyon ES and Musser MS - Traditional Hours
April 13, 2021- May 27, 2021
9
34
$22.97 = $7,028.82
3 Sites at 3.0 hrs per day
Total Hrs/day X
days/yr X
Hourly Billing Rate
Coyote Canyon ES and Musser MS - Additional Hours
April 13, 2021 - May 27, 2021
6
37
$22.97 = $5,099.34
2 Sites at 3.0 hrs per day
Total Hrs/day X
days/yr X
Hourly Billing Rate
Cucamonga MS
April 13, 2021 - May 27, 2021
4 37 F$22.97 = $3,399.56
2 Sites at 2.0 hrs per day Total Hrs/day X days/yr X Hourly Billing Rate
Cucamonga MS
TOTAL PROJECTED HOURS 1057 TOTAL PROJECTED COST 3/15/21 to 5/27/21 $24,279.29
CITY PROJECTED COST 3/15/21 to 5/27/21 $13,161.81
SD PROJECTED COST 3/15/21 to 5/27/21 $11,117.48
Page 5 of 5 Page 74
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
BETWEEN
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE ETIWANDA SCHOOL DISTRICT
This Memorandum of Understanding, dated (the "MOU") is made by and among the City
of Rancho Cucamonga, a California municipal corporation (the "City"), and the ETIWANDA School District,
a California school district (the "District"), collectively referred to herein as the "Parties".
A. RECITALS
(i) The purpose of this MOU is to clarify and formalize a shared cost agreement between the
City and the District for crossing guard services to be provided for the re -opening of schools beginning
March 15, 2021 and through May 25, 2021, the end of the District's 2020/21 academic school year.
(ii) Due to the COVID-19 pandemic and requirements for distancing, the District has provided
an atypical hybrid schedule, which will result in the need for additional hours of crossing guard services
to be requested of the City's crossing guard contractor, All City Management Services, Incorporated.
(iii) The City's purpose in funding the crossing guard services is to improve public safety by
protecting persons who are crossing the street or highway in the vicinity of a school at locations identified
by the City Engineer for City -funded crossing guards.
(iv) The City Engineer annually initiates a crossing guard study to evaluate school crossing,
including those served by crossing guards and locations identified through District and City discussions.
Based on the most recent crossing guard study, recommendations to the City Council were made as a part
of the City's 2020/21 fiscal year budget adoption process.
(v) For the remainder of the District's 2020/21 academic school year, in order to meet the
expedited reopening process, the City Council delegated to the City Manager the ability to approve the
City Engineer recommended locations for crossing guard services.
B. AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties hereto agree as follows:
1. Recitals Incorporated. The foregoing recitals are incorporated in this MOU by this
reference.
2. Party Obligations.
(i) City Obligations. At its own expense, the City shall provide crossing guards at each location
approved by the City Engineer for crossing guard services and identified in Exhibit "A" through May 25,
2021. The City Engineer will provide District with a description of the approved locations. The level of
service, including the number of crossing guards at each location, shall be determined at the City's sole
discretion.
1 of 5 ATTAPAWENT 3
(ii) District Obligations. Through May 25, 2021, District may request additional crossing guard
services at approved locations for additional shifts or hours (the "Additional Services"). District shall
provide such requests for Additional Services to City in writing at least 21 days in advance of the District's
desired date of the Additional Services. All Additional Services shall be paid for by District in accordance
with Section 3 and as identified in the "Client Worksheet" included in Exhibit "A".
3. Payment Terms
(a) District shall reimburse City for the Additional Services in accordance with the rates and
terms provided by City's contractor, All City Management Services, attached hereto as Exhibit "B." District
acknowledges that each one -hour shift may result in a charge in excess of one hour under City's contract
with All City Management Services. By way of example only, two (2) 1-hour shifts results in a charge for
three (3) hours.
(b) The City will send the District invoices every two -weeks ("Biweekly Invoice") for the
Additional Services. The Biweekly Invoice will list the expenses paid by the City on behalf of the District
for the Additional Services and will include:
1. Copies of invoices paid by the City.
2. A calculation of the hours paid ('by Site #, Location of the Intersection, and service
dates' or 'in total') by the City on behalf of the District according to Section 2. Party Obligations at the rate
per hour paid by the City.
(c) The District will reimburse the City within 45 days following the date of the Biweekly
Invoice. The District should address all reimbursement of expenses to:
City of Rancho Cucamonga
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739
Attention: Finance Department, Accounts Receivable
4. Term
The term of this MOU will commence on the date first written above and terminate after all
required reimbursements to the City have been made.
5. Miscellaneous Provisions
(a) Notice. All notices herein provided to be given, or which may be given, by either Party to
the other, shall be deemed to have been fully given when made in writing and received by the Parties at
their respective addresses:
ETIWANDA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Attention: Doug Claflin
Phone Number: 909-803-3124
Email: doug_claflin@etiwanda.org
Address: 6061 East Ave
Etiwanda, CA 91739
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Attention: John Gillison
Phone Number: 909-477-2700
Email: john.gillison@cityofrc.us
Address: 10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
2of5
Page 76
(b) Amendment and Waiver. This MOU may not be amended or modified, nor may any
of its terms be waived, except by written instruments signed by the Parties, and no verbal understanding
or agreement not incorporated herein shall be binding on any Party hereto. Each waiver or consent under
any provisions hereof shall be effective only in the specific instances for which given.
(d) Severability. If any provision of this MOU shall be held illegal, invalid, or
unenforceable, in whole or in part, the legality, validity, and enforceability of the remaining provisions
shall not be affected thereby.
(e) Governing law. This MOU shall be governed by and construed in accordance with
the laws of the State of California without reference to conflicts of law rules. Venue for all disputes shall
be proper in the Superior Court of San Bernardino County.
(f)
a factor.
Time of Essence
Time is of the essence for every provision hereof in which time is
(g) Counterparts and Facsimile. This MOU may be executed by the Parties in
counterparts, which counterparts shall be construed together and have the same effect as if all the Parties
had executed the same instrument. Counterpart signatures may be transmitted by facsimile, email, or
other electronic means and have the same force and effect as if they were original signatures. All Parties
have participated in the drafting of this MOU.
(h) Benefit of the Parties. The terms of this MOU shall be binding and inure to the benefit
of the Parties hereto and their successors and assigns. No Party shall assign this MOU or any portion
thereof to a third party without the prior consent of the other Party. Any such assignment without prior
written consent by one Party shall give the other Party the right to automatically and immediately
terminate this MOU with respect to the other Party making the unauthorized assignment without advance
notice.
(i) Entire Agreement of the Parties. This MOU supersedes any and all agreements,
either oral or written, between the Parties with respect to the subject matter of this MOU and contains
all of the representations, covenants, and agreements between the Parties with respect to the subject
matter of this MOU.
(j) Attorney's Fees. In the event that either Party commences any legal action or
proceeding to enforce or interpret the provisions of this MOU, the prevailing party in such action shall be
entitled to reasonable attorney's fees, costs and necessary disbursements, in addition to such other relief
as may be sought and awarded.
(k) Independent Counsel. Each Party has had the opportunity to consult with its own
attorney with respect to this MOU, and in the event that any language contained herein is construed to
be vague or ambiguous, this MOU shall not be strictly construed against any Party.
(1) Heading and Captions. The headings and captions used in this MOU are for convenience
only and shall in no way define, limit, or describe the scope or intent of the MOU or any part thereof.
In Witness Whereof, the Parties have caused this MOU to be executed as of the date first written above.
3 of 5 Page 77
ETIWANDA SCHOOL DISTRICT
BY:
NAME: DOUEIas M. Claflin
TITLE: Asst. Suat of Business Services
DATED:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
NAME: L. Dennis Michael
TITLE: Mayor
DATED:
4 of 5
Page 78
EXHIBIT A
')A SCHnnI r
Location
Ashton & Banyan (SX W/East St)
School
Etiwanda Colony Elementary
District
Etiwanda SD
Banyan & Bluegrass (NW)
Golden (John L.) Elementary School
Etiwanda SD
Craig & Etiwanda (NW)
Grapeland Elementary School
Etiwanda SD
Day Creek & Coyote (SE)
Day Creek Intermediate School
Etiwanda SD
Etiwanda & Victoria (SW)
Etiwanda Intermediate School
Etiwanda SD
Etiwanda/ South of Victoria (S X-IFOS)
Etiwanda Intermediate School
Etiwanda SD
Mt. View & Terra Vista (SE)
Terra Vista Elementary School
Etiwanda SD
Sierra Crest Loop & Vintage (NE)
Caryn Elementary School
Etiwanda SD
Victoria Park & Kenyon (NE)
Lightfoot (Carleton P.) Elementary School
Etiwanda SD
Victoria Park & Victoria Windrows Loop (NE)
Windrows Elementary School
Etiwanda SD
CLIENT
WORKSHEET 20202021
Department: 3604
City
of Rancho Cucamonga
Billing Rate for 2020/2021: $22.97
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
KEY:
Traditional Calendar: Etiwanda SD
For sites with no regularly scheduled early release days, use 180 regular days
March 16, 2021 - May 25, 2021
18 F 46
$2297 =
$19,01916
6 Sites at 3 0 hrs per day
Total Hrs/day X days/yr X
Hourly Billing Rate
Sites: #8, #13, #14, #15, #16 and #17 - Traditional Hours
March 16, 2021 -
12 F 46
$22 97 =
$12,679 44
6 Sites at 2 0 hrs per day
Total Hrs/day X days/yr X
Hourly Billing Rate
Sites: #8, #13, #14, #15, #16 and #17 - Additional Hours
Site # Descriptions
#8 Sierra Crest & LoopVintage (NE)
#14 Craig & Etiwanda (NW)
#13 Banyan & Bluegrass (NW)
#15 Victoria Park & Kenyon Way (NE)
#16 Mt. View/Tierra Vista (SE)
#17 Victoria ParkVictoria Windrows Loop
(NE)
March 16, 2021 - May 25, 2021
F3F 46
$22 97 =
$3,169 86
1 Sites at 3 0 hrs per day
Total Hrs/day X days/yr X
Hourly Billing Rate
Site #10 - Traditional Hours
March 16, 2021 - May 25, 2021
3 75 46
$22 97
$3,962 33
1 Sites at 3 75 hrs per day
Total Hrs/day X days/yr X
Hourly Billing Rate
Site #10- Additional Hours
Site # Descriptions
#10 Ashton & Banyan (SX W/East St)
March 29, 2021 - May 25, 2021
9 37
$22 97 —
$7,649 Ol
3 Sites at 3 0 hrs per day
Total Hrs/day X da s/ r X
Hourly Billing Rate
Sites: #9, #11 and #12 - Traditional Hours
March 29, 2021 - May 25, 2021
F6 F 37
$22 97
3 Sites at 2 0 hrs per day
Total Hrs/day X days/yr X
Hourly Billing Rate
Sites: #9, #11 and #12 - Additional Hours
Site # Descriptions
#9 Day Creek Blvd./Coyote (SE)
#12 Etiwanda/South of Victoria (S X-IFOS)
#11 Etiwanda/Victoria (SW)
TOTAL PROJECTED HOURS
2245.5 TOTAL PROJECTED COST 3/15/21 to 5/26/21
$51,579.14
CITY PROJECTED COST
3/15/21 to 5/26/21
$29,838.03
SD PROJECTED COST 3/15/21 to 5/26/21
$21,741.11
5 of 5 Page 79
DATE: May 19, 2021
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY: Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer
Romeo M. David, Associate Engineer
SUBJECT: Consideration to Accept as Complete, File the Notice of Completion and
Authorize Release of Retention and Bonds for the Tract 18960 Altura
Drive, Tejas Court and Wilson Avenue Miscellaneous Asphalt and
Concrete Repairs Project. (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council:
1. Accept the Tract 18960 Altura Drive, Tejas Court and Wilson Avenue Miscellaneous
Asphalt and Concrete Repairs Project, Contract No. 2020-146 (Project), as complete;
2. Approve the final contract amount of $96,490;
3. Authorize the release of the Faithful Performance Bond 35 days after recordation of Notice
of Completion and accept a Maintenance Guarantee Bond;
4. Authorize the release of the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of $101,090, six
months after the recordation of said notice if no claims have been received;
5. Authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and release of the project
retention, 35 days after recordation of Notice of Completion; and
6. Authorize the City Engineer to approve the release of the Maintenance Bond one year
following the fling of the Notice of Completion if the improvements remain free from
defects in material and workmanship.
BACKGROUND:
On December 16, 2020, the City Council awarded a construction contract to TSR Construction
and Inspections, Inc., in the amount of $96,770. A copy of the December 16, 2020, City Council
Staff Report is on file with the City Clerk. A vicinity map is included as Attachment 1.
The scope of work consisted of cold milling of the asphalt base course, placement of an asphalt
concrete pavement overlay at Altura Drive and Tejas Court, storm drain easement/trail grading,
export dirt and aggregate base placement, adjusting existing manholes and valves to new grade,
restriping, and miscellaneous concrete repairs, and related items of work per plans.
This project was completed as a result of the developer, Wilson Estates, LLC, failing to construct
certain public improvements as identified in the developments improvement agreement. The City
ultimately filed a claim with the developer's surety and received a total of $52,100, the full amount
of the bond, to put towards completing the project.
Page 80
The initial paving of Altura Drive and Tejas Court performed by TSR Construction did not meet
the City standard due to surface pavement raveling and an inconsistent finished surface. Staff
worked with the contractor to correct the substandard paving and asked the contractor to slurry
seal the new paving overlay to seal the raveling and create a consistent finish on the surface of
the road. This resulted in a completed project that meets City standards.
ANALYSIS:
The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications
and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
The net decrease in the total cost of the project is a result of two (2) Change Orders, including
the final balancing statement, which is summarized below:
Change Order No.1: Additional grading, exporting of dirt, and placement of aggregate base along
the existing storm drain easement. The change in contract cost due to this change order is an
increase of $8,500.
Change Order No.2: The balancing statement for the project. The balancing statement conforms
the final contract quantities to the actual quantities placed or constructed during the contract. The
notable change is a decrease in the contract quantities in the amount of $8,780 resulting from a
decrease in the final quantities of miscellaneous concrete repairs and elimination of curbside drain
installation under the contract.
At the end of the one-year maintenance period, if the improvements remain free from defects in
materials and workmanship, the City Clerk will release the Maintenance Bond upon approval by
the City Engineer.
FISCAL IMPACT:
A total of $96,770 was budgeted in Fiscal Year 2020/21 from the Citywide Infrastructure Fund
(Fund 198), which is identified under Capital Improvement Project Account No. and in the amount
listed below.
Account No.
I Funding Source
I Description
Amount
11983035650/2053198-0
1 Citywide Infrastructure Fund
I City Projects
$ 96,770
Total Project Funding =
$96,770
The final project cost is $96,490 as shown below:
Expenditure
Amount
Final Construction Contract
$ 96,490
Total Project Cost
$96,490
A total of $280 remains in the budget for this project and will be returned to the Citywide
Infrastructure Fund (Fund 198), fund balance to be used for future capital improvement
projects.
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:
This item addresses the City Council's Core Values by ensuring the construction of high -quality
public improvements that promote success as a world class community.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 - Vicinity Map
Page 2
Page 81
TRACT 18960 ALTURA DRIVE, TEJAS COURT
Vicinity Map
NOT TO SCALE
I g
.I^ ._.. _.. e1 _.., ._..
�n.e Rd Hillside Rd wnsln:.
[honner I I I
'I �-I
1 inoraughbretl Ba Wlt7
son Ave > I I �' "
Chaney
College School Project Site
Banyan St Banyan St _ J
Leman Ave n Lemon Ave AvrA,9e
•\ Alta Loma Dr <
ra�Or
'1Ir Alta Loma -
„ 6rePeiantl Etivmnela�
Upland Nllix ,1
Base Line Rd Country Clue I'
E� _
r
i E
um At n. — f Be
rt <
J _ ®Is; f;
Rancho = o e a
Cucamonga T 0 1`
'row Hay Arrow Re Arrow ate >
on
Koller
9th St m n ,y
North jersey Nw! Wery• JFlttAve
st f 8th is • • • • \ath St Cucamonga I
�NeOaSt
E An St m y v a
q e ••` q q y p
EfiM St eth B[
als10
E
< •� > Z F Y
Is
e am sti .�.. �.. _..,Rs,y._.. �.,.., _.. �.o sao oe�r., oirn Ave
Project Site ® A
N
'aAeffACHMENT 1
DATE: May 19, 2021
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY: William Wittkopf, Public Works Services Director
Ernest Ruiz, Streets, Storm Drains and Fleet Superintendent
Paul Fisher, Management Analyst III
SUBJECT: Consideration to Accept the Citywide Concrete Repair — FY 2019/2020
Project as Complete, File the Notice of Completion, and Authorize
Release of Retention and Bonds. (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the City Council:
1. Accept the Citywide Concrete Repair— FY 2019/2020 Project, Contract No. 2020-046,
as complete.
2. Approve the final contract amount of $358,289.82.
3. Authorize the release of the Faithful Performance Bond and accept a Maintenance
Bond.
4. Authorize the release of the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of $326,438, six
months after the recordation of said notice if no claims have been received.
5. Authorize the Public Works Services Director to file a Notice of Completion and release
of the retention in the amount of $17,914.50, 35 days after acceptance.
6. Authorize the Public Works Services Director to approve the release of the Maintenance
Bond one year following the fling of the Notice of Completion if the improvements
remain free from defects in material and workmanship.
BACKGROUND:
The Citywide Concrete Repair — FY 2019/2020 Project scope of work consisted of curb/gutter,
drive approach and sidewalk repairs in the Victoria Community and the neighborhood north of
Arrow Route and West of Hellman Avenue. Additional concrete repairs were completed in various
parks and paseos located in Landscape Maintenance Districts (LMDs) 2, and 4R.
Pertinent information of the project is as follows:
Budgeted Amount:
$396,720
Publish Dates for Loral Paper:
March 24, 2020 and March 31, 2020
Bid Opening:
April 14, 2020
Contract Award Date:
May 20, 2020
Low Bidder:
CT&T Concrete Paving, Inc.
Page 83
Contract Amount:
$326,438.00
Contingency:
$50,283.00
Final Contract Amount:
$358,289.82
Difference in Contract Amount:
$31,851.82 (9.7 %)
ANALYSIS:
The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications
and to the satisfaction of the Public Works Services Director.
The net increase in the total cost of the project is a result of the use of contingency funds to
complete work at additional sites within the project areas requiring repairs.
At the end of the one-year maintenance period, if the improvements remain free from defects in
materials and workmanship, the City Clerk is authorized to release the Maintenance Bond upon
approval by the Public Works Services Director.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Adequate funds were included in the Fiscal Year 2019/20 adopted budget for this project in
account numbers 1001318-5650/1991001-0 (Street Maintenance), 1177303-5650/1991177-0
(Measure 1), 1131303-5300 (LMD 2), and 1134303-5300 (LMD 4R).
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:
This project addresses the City Council's core vale of promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy
community for all. Repairing sidewalks with lifts and gaps in the public right of way, enhances the
appearance and walkability of the affected neighborhoods.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 — Notice of Completion
Page 2
Page 84
{
)§
{
k
!
-
k
(/
/
§
2
_
7
\
=
!
#n
/
!
}
\,
\
\)
)
(
�\
>o
)0
0
00
E
ko
k�\
0 E-
�
/
k/
)
k!f/k
!�
-cc
-)
_
/
\
{`
w
!
_V\\
&\k
�
{k
|
;!)
k\
§
3!
a•
`�
( |
\
*
_®!
§
.
e!
§;)
§§;§
0
0
!
ooli
{
|
(2J
k
§(2J
{
\§
/
!
\
\
d\
�{.
{o
:fe
!
(
)\{\
`
E
\)E
\
|
0
_
E
\
\
2|
!J
4!Z
\
%
!
DATE:
May 19, 2021
TO:
Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:
John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY:
Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer
Sandra Salazar, Associate Engineer
SUBJECT:
Consideration to Accept as Complete, File a Notice of Completion, and
Authorize Release of Retention, and Bonds for the Vineyard Avenue at
San Bernardino Road Traffic Signal Modification Project. (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council:
1. Accept the Vineyard Avenue at San Bernardino Road Traffic Signal Modification Project
(Project), as complete;
2. Approve the final contract amount of $109,413;
3. Authorize the release of the Faithful Performance Bond 35 days after recordation of Notice
of Completion and accept a Maintenance Guarantee Bond;
4. Authorize the release of the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of $101,307, six
months after the recordation of said notice if no claims have been received;
5. Authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and release of the project
retention, 35 days after recordation of Notice of Completion; and
6. Authorize the City Engineer to approve the release of the Maintenance Bond one year
following the fling of the Notice of Completion if the improvements remain free from
defects in material and workmanship.
BACKGROUND:
On August 7, 2019 the City Council awarded a contract for the construction of the Public Safety
Facility located at the northwest comer of Vineyard Avenue and San Bernardino Road. The new
Public Safety Facility prompted modifications to the existing traffic signal at the intersection of
Vineyard Avenue and San Bernardino Road. Upgrades to the traffic signal cabinet and equipment
were necessary to provide effective emergency vehicle preemption which will increase the
efficiency of emergency response times.
On September 16, 2020, the City Council awarded a construction contract for the Project to
Elecnor Beim Electric, Inc., in the amount of $101,307 plus a 10% contingency in the amount of
Page 86
$10,131 to address unforeseen construction related incidentals. Copies of the City Council Staff
Reports are on file with the City Clerk. A vicinity map is included as Attachment 1.
The scope of work consisted of installation of conduits, wires, pull boxes, traffic signal cabinet,
emergency vehicle preemption, and related traffic signal equipment.
ANALYSIS:
The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications
and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
The net increase in the total cost of the project is a result of two (2) change orders, including the
balancing statement, which is summarized below:
Change Order No.1: Upgrade the battery backup system and batteries to improve the reliability
of backup power at the traffic signal cabinet. The change in contract cost due to this change order
is an increase of $9,900.
Change Order No.2: The balancing statement for the project. The balancing statement conforms
the final contract quantities to the actual quantities placed or constructed during the contract. The
notable change is a decrease in the contract quantities in the amount of $1,794 resulting from a
decrease in the final quantities of conduit installation and pullbox removals.
At the end of the one-year maintenance period, if the improvements remain free from defects in
materials and workmanship, the City Clerk will release the Maintenance Bond upon approval by
the City Engineer.
FISCAL IMPACT:
A total of $238,379 was budgeted from the Fire Capital Projects (Fund 288) and the
Transportation Fund (Fund 124), which is identified under Capital Improvement Project Account
No. and in the amount listed below:
Account No.
Funding Source
Funding Source
Amount
11243035650/1994124-0
Transportation
Fund 124
Traffic Signal Mod:
Vineyard @ SB
$88,379
32885015650/1994288-0
Fire Protection
Capital Fund 288
Traffic Signal Mod:
Vineyard @ SB
$150,000
Total Project Funding
$238,379
The final project cost is $129,213 as shown below:
Expenditure
Amount
Final Construction Contract
$109,413
Construction Inspection Services
$19,800
Total Project Cost=
$129,213
A total of $109,166 is remaining in the budget for this project and $73,237 will be returned to the
Fire Capital (Fund 288) and $35,929 will be returned to the Transportation (Fund 124), fund
balance to be used for future capital improvement projects.
Page 2
Page 87
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:
This item addresses the City Council's vision for the City by ensuring the construction of high -
quality public improvements that promote a world class community. This also supports the City
Council's Core Value of promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community for all.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 - Vicinity Map
Page 3
Page 88
VINEYARD AT SAN BERNARDINO TRAFFIC SIGNAL
MODIFICATION PROJECT
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
Project 'A
N
'A�ACHMENT1
DATE: May 19, 2021
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY: Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer
Justine Garcia, Deputy Director of Engineering Services
SUBJECT: Consideration of Amendment No.1 to the Construction and Maintenance
Agreement for Hellman Avenue. (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council approve Amendment No.1 to the Construction and
Maintenance Agreement for Hellman Avenue between the City and Southern California Regional
Rail Authority (SCRRA).
BACKGROUND:
In April of 2016 the City Council approved the original Construction and Maintenance Agreement
Between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and SCRRA for the widening of Hellman Avenue and
8" Street, a new traffic signal and at -grade rail crossing improvements at the Metrolink tracks
located north of 81^ Street (project). The construction began in April of 2017 and the project was
ultimately accepted as complete by the City Council at the August 7, 2019 meeting.
ANALYSIS:
During the construction phase, a minor design exception was approved by SCRRA to install
truncated domes that are not typically used by SCRRA but complied with City standards. The City
requested to maintain the installed truncated domes to ensure they remain per City standard if
replacement is necessary in the future. In addition, SCRRA requested to specify any remaining
maintenance responsibilities as they pertain to the project.
Amendment No.1 was drafted to designate both City and SCRRA maintenance responsibilities
that have been agreed upon by both parties.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Amendment No. 1 is needed to clarify the parties' responsibilities and there is no fiscal impact
associated with this Amendment beyond what was anticipated by the City under the original
Agreement.
COUNCIL MISSION I VISION I GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:
This item addresses the City Council's vision for the City by ensuring the maintenance of a high -
quality public improvement that promotes a world class community.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 — Amendment No.1 to the Construction and Maintenance Agreement for Hellman
Avenue
Page 90
AMENDMENT NO. 1
CONSTRUCTION AND
MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
for
HELLMAN AVENUE
BETWEEN
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGIONAL RAIL
AUTHORITY (SCRRA)
AND THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COVERING THE
CROSSING WIDENING
AT
SCRRA MP 39.60 - SAN GABRIEL SUBDIVISION
DOT NO.: 02664R
CPUC NO.: 101 SG-039.6
IN
RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
1�1"HMENT 1
Construction and Maintenance Agreement
For
HELLMAN AVENUE
CPUC No. 101 SG-39.60
DOT No.: 026164R
MP 39.60 - San Gabriel Subdivision
Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California
This "AMENDMENT No. 1" to the Construction and Maintenance Agreement for Hellman
Avenue, effective April 261h, 2016, hereinafter referred to as ("C&M") is made effective as of the 19th day of
May, 2021, by and between the SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGIONAL RAIL AUTHORITY, a joint
powers authority existing under the laws of the State of California (hereinafter referred to as "SCRRA"), to be
addressed at 900 Wilshire Blvd, Ste. 1500, Los Angeles, CA 90017 and the CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, a general law city and municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State
of California, (hereinafter referred to as "CITY"), to be addressed at 10500 Civic Center Drive, P.O. Box 807,
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729. CITY and SCRRA may be referred to singly as "PARTY" and collectively as
"PARTIES."
RECITALS:
SCRRA entered into a Construction and Maintenance Agreement dated April 26t11, 2016, ("ORIGINAL
AGREEMENT") that defined the terms and conditions for the construction and maintenance of the safety
enhancements at the Hellman Ave grade crossing ("PROJECT")
The PROJECT may be summarized as the addition of typical safety measures such as median barriers, pedestrian
gates with flashing lights, pedestrian channelization, traffic signal installation, street widening, signage and
striping improvements, and fencing to systematically reduce the opportunity for accidents at grade crossings.
ATTACk
The CITY has requested that CITY maintain the truncated domes and SCRRA has requested to specify the
remaining maintenance responsibilities. The original Article 5 will be replaced with the detailed description.
Therefore, it has been agreed that the ORIGINAL AGREEMENT will be amended in this Amendment No. 1 to
clarify roles and responsibilities for SCRRA and the CITY in regards to the maintenance of the PROJECT.
AGREEMENT
In consideration of the promises and mutual understandings of the parties hereto, SCRRA and
the CITY agree to changes, deletions, and additions as identified below:
ARTICLE 5 — MAINTENANCE BY CITY
Article 5 is changed in its entirety to the following:
5.1 CITY shall share equally with SCRRA the maintenance cost of the railroad crossing warning signals and
signal controls in accordance with CPUC Code § 1202.2 of the California state statutes, except that CITY's
liability therefor shall be limited to such funds as may be set aside for allocation through the CPUC, pursuant to
CPUC Code § 1231.1. SCRRA shall submit annual invoices to the CPUC for CITY's share of the maintenance
costs of the railroad crossing warning signals and signal controls. This results in no direct cost to CITY for the
maintenance of the automatic warning devices.
5.2 CITY shall maintain, repair and renew the at -grade highway railroad crossing area within their respective
CITY boundaries starting at two (2) feet outside of the rails of each track. The CITY shall maintain and repair, at
the CITY's expense, any street improvements, including street lighting, sidewalks, curb and gutters, raised
medians and traffic striping and signage as well as detectible warning tactile strips within the CROSSING
AREA. This work shall be done pursuant to CPUC General Order 72-B.
5.3 The CITY shall, at the CITY's expense, coordinate with and participate in an Annual Joint Inspection of
the traffic signal and associated railroad inner -connect (preemption) systems and provide assistance in support of
SCRRA routine and any required troubleshooting testing of railroad/traffic signal pre-emption equipment and
facilities in accordance with FRA Regulation Title 49 part 234 Subpart d of the Code of Federal Regulations (49
ATTAC*
CFR Part 234), and provide qualified personnel to assist with testing of those traffic signal interconnect features
outside of the Railroad right-of-way.
5.4 CITY shall notify SCRRA five (5) business days in advance of any maintenance of a roadway, sidewalk
or median islands, if that maintenance activity is to occur within the railroad right-of-way. Any SCRRA flagging
or inspection deemed by SCRRA to be required to protect SCRRA tracks or the traffic moving thereon shall be
paid for by City.
5.5 CITY shall control or remove at the CITY's expense weeds or vegetation located within the CITY crossing
easement or within public street right of way on or about the crossing so that it does not become a fire hazard;
obstruct visibility of railroad signs and signals along the right-of-way and at highway -rail crossings; obstruct
visibility of trains or rail equipment; interfere with railroad employees performing normal trackside duties;
prevent proper functioning of signal and communication lines or impede railroad employees visually inspecting
moving equipment. If the CITY may not lawfully perform the control or removal work, CITY shall reimburse
SCRRA for the cost of performing such control or removal.
5.6 If in the future, the CITY elects to modify the existing crossing(s) by widening or replacement of crossing
surface(s), then any SCRRA costs of modifications to crossing(s), including material and/or repair or
rehabilitation of the railroad tracks shall be borne by the CITY.
5.7 If in the future, the CITY elects or is required by the CPUC or FRA to raise or lower the grade of all or
any portion of the street and highway located on the crossing easement(s), SCRRA shall conform the track or
tracks in and beyond the crossing easement area(s) to conform with change of grade of the street or highway at
the expense of the CITY, the CPUC or FRA..
5.8 CITY shall incorporate the requirements of Exhibit E-1 and Exhibit E-3 into each prime contract for
maintenance. CITY shall exercise its authority as a party to any contract for maintenance into which it enters: to
ensure its contractor(s) conforms with the requirements listed in Exhibit E-1 and Exhibit E-3, and to ensure that
operations, right of -way, property, or other facilities of SCRRA or the operations, property or facilities of others
occupying or using SCRRA right-of-way, are protected at all times. All work done by CITY, or its contractor(s),
on the railroad right-of-way shall be done in a manner satisfactory to SCRRA.
ATTAC H TT I
ARTICLE 5.11 - MAINTENANCE BY SCRRA
5.9 SCRRA shall maintain, repair and renew the at -grade highway railroad crossing area between lines two
(2) feet outside of the rails of each track. When two or more tracks are involved, SCRRA shall maintain, at its
expense, the area between the tracks where the distance between the center lines of tracks is not greater than
fifteen (15) feet at the center line of highway, normal to the tracks. This work shall be done pursuant to CPUC
General Order 72-13.
5.10 SCRRA shall maintain, repair, and renew the railroad warning devices including vehicular and pedestrian
warning devices, vehicle intrusion detection devices, emergency exit swing gates, striping between the warning
devices and channelization devices for pedestrians (fencing and hand railing).
SCRRA shall perform pre-emption testing at those crossings with traffic signal preemption in accordance with
FRA Regulation Title 49 Part 234 Subpart D of the Code of Federal Regulation (49 CFR Part 234).
All paragraphs of the ORIGINAL AGREEMENT that are not amended in the Amendment No. 1 remain
unchanged and in full force and effect.
ATTAC 61�T 1
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this AGREEMENT to be duly executed in by their duly
qualified and authorized officials.
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGIONAL
RAIL AUTHORITY
Stephanie Wiggins
Chief Executive Officer
Date
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Don O. Del Rio
General Counsel
Date:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
By:
L. Dennis Michael
Mayor
Date:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By:
Date:
ATTACV
DATE: May 19, 2021
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY: Julie A. Sowles, Library Director
Cara Vera, Library Services Manager
Ruth Cain, Purchasing Manager
SUBJECT: Consideration to Approve the Use of Midwest Tape to Provide Digital
Media Content to the Rancho Cucamonga Public Library Using the
Hoopla Platform. (CITY)
Staff recommends the City Council approve the use of Midwest Tape's Hoopla platform for the
provision of patron driven acquisition of digital media content.
BACKGROUND:
Since 1989, Midwest Tape has been a leading distributor of DVDs, CDs, audiobooks, and other
physical audio-visual formats to libraries. Midwest Tape now distributes Hoopla, a co -branded,
digital audio-visual content service. Hoopla's delivery model and content are the only Library
Media on Demand (LMOD) software application offered to and by libraries and is manufactured,
sold and distributed exclusively by Midwest Tape.
Hoopla's digital service platform is a proprietary design which provides libraries the only true
patron -driven acquisition model in which all digital media content (audiobooks, eBooks, comics,
movies, TV, and music) is made available under a single login and to every user, simultaneously.
Hoopla is currently the sole content provider of LMOD for MGM, NBC Universal, Nat Geo, Bold
and Beautiful, Miramax, RLJ, Warner Music, Universal Music, DC Comics, Lionsgate, Viacom,
and many other content creators.
ANALYSIS:
Hoopla offers a unique product that combines multiple book and media formats through an all -in -
one service. Users access the digital content using an "on demand" model where the Library is
charged for each checkout as content is consumed, rather than paying an annual subscription
fee for access to the overall collection. The Library can meter the related expenses through
various service controls such as setting limits on the number of monthly checkouts per user and
offering content at varying price points.
Hoopla's simultaneous use model provides a key benefit to the Library's users. Other digital
content providers typically operate under a one -tonne lending model where with a copy of a title
is lent to a single borrower at a time, the traditional physical material lending model. However,
Page 97
Hoopla's simultaneous use model offers unlimited checkouts per item providing instantaneous
access to materials and wait -free checkouts. Simultaneous use expands the Library's digital
media collection exponentially, while reducing barriers to content.
A single source justification process is the most efficient way to ensure library patrons receive
excellent service and the benefit of a high quality, relevant digital media collection that meets their
educational and entertainment needs. This new service will greatly enhance the Library's digital
media collections and will provide users with fast and convenient access to content like that
provided by commercial vendors such as Netflix and Hulu.
Based on Hoopla's extensive inventory, variety of formats, simultaneous use and Library Media
on Demand features, a Single Source Memo was submitted to and approved by the Procurement
Manager. Staff requests that the City Council accept the single source bid for the additional scope
of services from Midwest Tape to provide the Library with Hoopla's digital media platform.
Copies of all supporting documents are on file with the City Clerk and Procurement Offices.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Funding for this service is not to exceed $35,000 annually and will come from Library Fund object
1290601-5200 Contract Services.
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S):
Providing superior Library Services to residents contributes to a high quality of life in Rancho
Cucamonga.
ATTACHMENTS:
None.
Page 2
Page 98
DATE: May 19, 2021
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY: Jennifer Hunt Gracia, Community Services Director
Darryl Polk, Director of Innovation and Technology
Tony Schondel, Community Services Supervisor
Jennifer Brown, Management Analyst I
SUBJECT: Consideration to Award Contract to Southern California Sound Image for the
"Central Park AA/ Update Project" and to Approve Change Order 001 for the
Council Chambers A/V Refresh. (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the City Council approve the plans and specifications, accept the bids
received, award and authorize the execution of a contract in the amount of $237,940 for the
"Central Park AN Update Project" to the lowest responsive bidder, Southern California Sound
Image of Escondido and authorize the expenditure of a contingency in the amount of $12,060.
Staff also recommends the City Council approve Change Order 001 to the contract for Southern
California Sound Image to complete the AIV refresh of the City Council Chambers in an amount
not to exceed $150,000, for a total not to exceed amount of $400,000 for the awarded contract.
BACKGROUND:
The existing audio and video technologies in the largest event rooms at Central Park are original
to the building which opened in 2005. David Dreier Hall and Rancho Cucamonga Hall are used
by City of Rancho Cucamonga residents, employees, and neighboring agencies, and serve as
multi -functional spaces that host a variety of events including but not limited to conferences,
luncheons, speaking engagements, award ceremonies, performances, birthday parties, weddings
and family gatherings. The current audiovisual system has experienced multiple system
component failures in the last few years and can no longer meet the demands of the facility. The
outdated equipment has posed significant challenges operating adequately for staff and rental
customers, preventing and limiting proper use of the equipment and the potential for rental
revenue.
City staff from DoIT, Community Services and Public Works worked together to identify the
problem areas that need to be corrected, and the deficiencies that need to be addressed. The
consulting firm of Auerbach Pollock Friedlander was contracted to create a conceptual design
based on the desired system amenities and capabilities and prepare bid specifications. The
existing system will be replaced by one that is modem, efficient and increases the capabilities of
the rooms. The new system, which can be controlled remotely via tablet, includes ADA-compliant
assistive listening devices and a fire alarm -activated automatic mute feature. Our currently
outdated 4:3 aspect ratio projection screens will be replaced by motorized, drop -down screens
Page 1 of 2 Page 99
with a 16:9 ratio that is utilized by nearly every modern media player. A mobile audio and video
system will allow increased use of space, such a Mesa Courtyard.
Regarding the Council Chambers A/V refurbish, the audio and visual equipment in the Council
Chambers supporting the broadcast of City Council meetings to the public was last updated in
2015. Within the past two years components of the Council Chambers equipment have reached
the end of their projected service life and have begun to fail unexpectedly, causing intermittent
service disruptions during meetings and special events. Auerbach Pollock Friedlander is also
developing the specific design plans for the Council Chambers which will be used to develop a
project estimate from Southern California Sound Image.
ANALYSIS:
Six (6) bids for this project were opened at 2:00 pm on Tuesday, April 13, 2021 (see attached Bid
Summary and Bid Analysis). Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds
that the lowest responsive bidder, Southern California Sound Image of Escondido, has met the
requirements of the bid documents.
The project is scheduled to be completed within ninety (90) working days.
Staff is requesting a contingency of $12,060 in the event that something unexpected is discovered
during system installation.
The not to exceed allowance of $150,000 for the Council Chambers A/V Refresh project includes
anticipated project costs and contingencies.
All documents related to this project are on file with the City Clerk.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The Fiscal Year 2020/21 Amended Budget includes $250,000 for the Central Park A/V
Replacement project to be funded from account number 1025001-5602 (Capital Reserve Fund -
Capital Outlay -Equipment). For the Council Chambers A/V Refresh project, staff recommends an
additional appropriation in the amount of $181,800 into account number 1025001-5602 to cover
the projected $150,000 in equipment and service costs from Southern California Sound Image
and the contract amendment with Auerbach Pollock Friedlander in the amount of $31,800 to
complete design work for the Council Chambers refresh. The cost of the Council Chambers A/V
Refresh project will be reimbursed by PEG funds into revenue account number 1025000-4911
(Reimbursement from Other Funds).
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:
The Central Park and Council Chambers AN Systems Update projects address the core value of
intentionally embracing and anticipating the future as improvements to our systems exponentially
increase the capabilities of staff to serve our internal and external rental customers.
ATTACHMENTS:
None.
Page 2 of 2 Page 100
DATE: May 19, 2021
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY: Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer
Linda Ceballos, Environmental Programs Manager
SUBJECT: Public Hearing to Consider a Resolution for Placement of Special
Assessments and Liens for Delinquent Solid Waste Accounts.
(RESOLUTION NO. 2021-040) (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution approving the report of Burrtec Waste
Industries, Inc. (Burrtec) delinquent solid waste accounts, and authorizing the placement of
special assessments and liens against the respective parcels of land to be collected for the City
of Rancho Cucamonga at the same time and manner as ordinary County ad valorem property
taxes.
BACKGROUND:
Section 8.17.170 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code establishes the requirements for
mandatory payment for residential, commercial, and industrial solid waste collection service. As
a result, the municipal code requires all occupied properties within the City to have weekly solid
waste collection service, provided by the existing franchise waste hauler, or comply with the
requirements of the self haul permit program administered by City staff. This section of the code
allows fees that are delinquent for more than 60 days to become special assessments against
the respective parcels of land, resulting in liens on the property for the amount of the delinquent
fee, plus administrative charges.
Annually, Burrtec provides a list of accounts that are delinquent for more than 60 days. City staff
reviews the list and property owner addresses to correct any discrepancies that might prevent a
property owner from receiving the Public Hearing Notice. The address that is used for the
notification is the address on file with the County Tax Assessor at the time of the reviewing period.
The Public Hearing Notice is then mailed to the property owner by certified mail no less than 10
days prior to the Public Hearing date.
ANALYSIS:
The City received a list of delinquent solid waste accounts from Burrtec on March 4, 2021. The
list included 1,713 delinquent accounts that accrued between January 1, 2020 through December
31, 2020 and that are past due by more than 60 days.
An updated list was provided by Burrtec on April 8, 2021 amended to remove properties with
accounts that had been paid and cleared of delinquent charges and has been adjusted staff to
Page 101
account for property ownership changes. A Notice of Public Hearing was mailed on April 22, 2021
to 1,016 property owners with delinquent solid waste accounts. In addition, a Notice of Public
Hearing was placed in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper on May 4, 2021. The current
list of delinquent accounts is included in the attached resolution as Exhibit'A' and includes 1,016
delinquent accounts for a total of $387,677.08. Property owners that are currently on the
delinquency list have until July 12, 2021, to submit payment to Burrtec. The final list of delinquent
accounts (excluding those paid by July 12, 2021) will then be submitted to the County Tax
Collector for the 2021-2022 tax roll. As of May 5, 2021, City staff responded to 32 inquiries from
property owners, and the City Clerk has received one (1) written protest.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The City will receive revenue in the form of franchise fees along with any associated administrative
fees when the delinquent accounts are paid through the County of San Bernardino property tax
collection process.
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:
This item is in line with Council Core Values by ensurin
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 — Resolution No. 2021-040
g
Page 2
Page 102
RESOLUTION NO. 21-XXXX
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING THE REPORT OF
DELINQUENT CHARGES FROM BURRTEC WASTE INDUSTRIES, INC.
FOR SOLID WASTE COLLECTION, WHICH SHALL CONSTITUTE
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AND LIENS AGAINST THE RESPECTIVE
PARCELS OF LAND AND SHALL BE COLLECTED FOR THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA AT THE SAME TIME AND IN THE
SAME MANNER AS ORDINARY COUNTY AD VALOREM PROPERTY
TAXES
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 8.17.170 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code every
person who occupies any developed real property within the City of Rancho Cucamonga whether at a
residential, commercial, or industrial location, or otherwise shall make or cause to be made with the City
of Rancho Cucamonga authorized agent, appropriate arrangements for regular solid waste collection
services and it is unlawful for any such person to fail, refuse or neglect to do so; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 8.17.170 the solid waste collection fee shall be a civil debt owing
or due to the City of Rancho Cucamonga or its authorized agent or contractor from the occupant or property
owner required to have service under this Chapter. An invoice for solid waste collection service unpaid for
sixty (60) days is considered delinquent; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 8.17.170 any fees authorized pursuant to this Chapter which
remain unpaid after the delinquent date as set forth in this Chapter may be collected by the City of Rancho
Cucamonga as provided in this Section; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has caused to be prepared a report of delinquent charges; and
WHEREAS, a copy of said report is attached hereto, marked Exhibit "A" and made a part of this
Resolution; and
WHEREAS, the City Council scheduled 7:00 p.m. on May 19, 2021, at the City of Rancho
Cucamonga City Hall located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California as the time and
place for hearing the report and any objections or protests thereto; and
WHEREAS, the City Council caused notice of the hearing to be mailed certified to the property
owners listed on the report, at their addresses as shown on the last equalized assessment roll, not less
than ten (10) days prior to the date of the hearing; and
WHEREAS, at the hearing, the City Council heard all objections or protests of property owners, or
their representatives, liable to be assessed for delinquent charges; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has made such revisions and corrections to the report as it deems
just; and
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY
RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
Resolution No. 21-XXX - Page 1 of 2
ATTACHMENT 1
Page 103
Section 1. That the delinquent charges for solid waste collection set forth in the report attached hereto as
Exhibit °A' are hereby confirmed.
Section 2. That pursuant to California Government Code Sections 38790.1 and 25831, the delinquent
charges set forth in the confirmed report shall constitute special assessments against the respective
parcels of land and is a lien on the property for the amount of the delinquent charges.
Section 3. That the City Clerk is instructed to file a certified copy of this Resolution, including the confirmed
report, with the San Bernardino County Auditor/Controller for the amounts of the respective assessments
against the respective parcels of land as they appear on the current assessment (tax) roll.
Section 4. That the City Clerk is instructed to record a certified copy of this Resolution, including the
confirmed report, in the office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County.
Section 5. Collection Procedure. That the assessments shall be collected for the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, California, at the same time and in the same manner as ordinary county ad valorem property
taxes are collected and shall be subject to the same penalties and the same procedure and sale in case
of delinquency as provided for those taxes. All laws applicable to the levy, collection and enforcement of
county ad valorem property taxes shall be applicable to such assessment, except that if any real property
to which such lien would attach has been transferred or conveyed to a bona fide purchaser for value, or if
a lien of a bona fide encumbrancer for value has been created and attaches thereon, prior to the date on
which the first installment of such taxes would become delinquent, then the lien which would otherwise be
imposed by this section shall not attach to such real property and the delinquent charges, as confirmed,
relating to such property shall be transferred to the unsecured roll for collection.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this _ day of , 2021.
Resolution No. 21-XXX - Page 2 of 2
Page 104
Exhibit 'A'
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
BURRTEC WASTE INDUSTRIES
DELINQUENT SOLID WASTE ACCOUNTS
Parcel Number
Property Owner Information
Service Address
Total Amount
0201092050000
CARTNEY, DANA PATRICK REV TR 05/22/1
6250 Terracina Ave
$
251.52
0201092130000
LI, YIDI
10960 Belcanto Dr
$
362.04
0201102340000
GAO, YOUNING
6349 Calle Hermoso
$
251.52
0201122090000
KHARRAZI, MOHAMMAD R
6190 Cantabria Ave
$
318.86
0201122140000
YUAN, CHENFEI
10889 Mirador Dr
$
472.56
0201122220000
YI, CHRISTINA
6211 Serena PI
$
196.26
0201142080000
LEWIS, KENNETH A
9729 Manzanita Dr
$
230.03
0201244010000
ROJAS, AUREA F
5708 Winchester Ct
$
363.12
0201251350000
IBELIEVE LTD
6275 Archibald Ave
$
211.66
0201301050000
PURDY, KEVIN M
6246 Mayberry Ave
$
306.78
0201321230000
NICOLETTE, MARK
6215 Cartilla Ave
$
256.78
0201341300000
(VERY, LAMONT
9161 Garden St
$
612.72
0201341540000
MICRO CT AZ MIL DIVISION LLC
6690 Hellman Ave
$
564.96
0201362020000
NNAM, MELVINA C
6210 Filkins Ave
$
563.72
0201394220000
ARANDA, PATRICK
6442 Aleatico PI
$
234.59
0201394250000
MC CRACKEN, RYAN
6404 Aleatico PI
$
472.56
0201413020000
SLAUGHTER-COLLI, JACQUELINE
8250 Garden Ct
$
472.56
0201474550000
HERRERA, JOSEPH GERARD
6613 Sugarpine PI
$
306.78
0201503190000
BANDAZEWSKI, JAMES C
9828 Cypress Ct
$
306.78
0201563370000
SHARIF, JESSIE
10295 Southridge Dr
$
472.56
0201573610000
LU, YAN
10111 Thorpe Ct
$
362.04
0201583070000
LI, JIAN
10237 Kernwood Ct
$
251.52
0201583200000
HUDSON, SHELDON
10282 Kernwood Ct
$
417.30
0201583460000
EDMON, MARIANNE M - EST OF
10287 Coralwood Ct
$
564.96
0201584270000
LIAO, JUN
10205 Northridge Dr
$
472.56
0201594120000
TAYLOR, JOHN
6124 Callaway PI
$
472.56
0201623710000
R AND Z INVESTMENT GROUP LLC
6266 Brandy PI
$
472.56
0201632690000
CARRETO, JOSE
6311 Semillon PI
$
515.28
0201632830000
GASSNER, TERRY
6349 Wine Ct
$
243.12
0201663390000
CHILDS, JEFFERY B
11013 Stone River Dr
$
204.22
0201691560000
WANG, WEIFENG
6228 Ramona Ave
$
262.03
0201691690000
SAENZ, DEREK X
9920 Lemon Ave
$
292.72
0201731210000
CARRILLO, STEVEN C
6345 Kinlock Ave
$
409.96
0201741130000
JOHNS, LIZETTE MONIQUE
10356 Bristol Dr
$
222.24
0201741230000
WATLING, JEFFREY C
6383 Revere Ave
$
306.78
0201741260000
CARDIN, RACHEL
6353 Revere Ave
$
564.96
0201751050000
RODRIGUEZ, JUAN E
6415 Revere Ave
$
224.34
0201761320000
RILEY, PHILLIPA A
6171 Kinlock Ave
$
657.36
0201771540000
KHAW, EMILY
10651 Concannon St
$
196.26
0201782040000
LEWIS, RITCHIE M
11154 Antietam Dr
$
362.04
0201782080000
VIGIL, CRISTIAN
5989 Cedar Mountain Dr
$
472.56
0201801600000
HAINES, ELIZABETH A
8359 Garden St
$
306.78
0201811040000
MCLELAND, JEANINE M
8511 Hawthorne St
$
251.52
0201811190000
PIETRASZ, RICHARD M
6635 Topaz St
$
363.12
0201821100000
DALEY, JOSHUA E
6186 Revere Ave
$
564.96
0201901320000
DIXON, GORDON L III
10087 Bristol Dr
$
272.56
0201922030000
IDEEB, MALIK
16321 Silverwood PI
$
306.78
0201922160000
MUNGUTA, LAURA E
11249 Summerside Dr
$
472.56
Page 105
Exhibit 'A'
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
BURRTEC WASTE INDUSTRIES
DELINQUENT SOLID WASTE ACCOUNTS
0201932070000
BUSH, ROBERT T
11260 Oak Brook Ct
$ 363.12
0201932340000
SURFACE, PATRICK
6201 Morning PI
$ 190.35
0201932350000
WANG, RUIJIE
6211 Morning PI
$ 472.56
0201932360000
SHEN, XIAOYIN
6221 Morning PI
$ 472.56
0202021440000
LU, DEREK
8485 19th St
$ 196.26
0202061180000
GOMEZ, MARIA ANTONIA
9349 19th St
$ 194.30
0202071120000
BENJAMIN FAMILY TRUST 3/31/94
7034 Amethyst Ave
$ 403.48
0202072430000
DISNEY, EDDIE G
9358 La Grande St
$ 363.12
0202081010000
ROJO, ARMANDO M
7137 Hellman Ave
$ 251.52
0202081110000
MARTINEZ, HECTOR
9415 La Grande St
$ 196.26
0202081160000
KAVIKAM LLC
9491 La Grande St
$ 458.28
0202081430000
LAM, CRYSTAL
7112 Amethyst Ave
$ 320.36
0202091220000
RIOS, RICHARD F LIVING TRUST 10/23/
7245 Hellman Ave
$ 251.52
0202111600000
DESEVRENJACQUET, NICKOLAS S
6713 Klusman Ave
$ 196.26
0202131360000
STEPHENS, DEIRDRE M
9659 Monte Vista St
$ 229.69
0202131390000
MIRANDA, BELIA
9633 Monte Vista St
$ 564.96
0202131670000
ZARAGOZA, CARLOS
9511 Monte Vista St
$ 393.88
0202172410000
JIANG, RUIZENG
9459 Hedges Dr
$ 201.02
0202193020000
NALL, STEPHEN M
7201 Linden Ln
$ 329.92
0202193110000
ANNUNZIATO, ANTHONY
8399 Derfer Dr
$ 208.74
0202243050000
MORAGA, JULIE R
7205 Eastwood Ave
$ 344.84
0202251340000
PENAFIEL, DANIEL E
8451 Monte Vista St
$ 196.26
0202262080000
HAMILTON, MARTINA R LIVING TR 10/5/1
8626 Monte Vista St
$ 423.64
0202271170000
NWOBU, NGOZI
8552 La Vine St
$ 251.52
0202273080000
BIRCHEFF, LOUIS & DARLA FAM TR 9/21/
8621 La Grande St
$ 306.78
0202274110000
DIMAS, GREG C
8570 La Grande St
$ 337.49
0202285010000
Roberts, Gerald
7022 Cameo St
$ 306.78
0202286040000
RUIZ, WILFREDO R
7042 Jasper St
$ 472.56
0202286110000
FLECHTNER, LINDA V
7041 Cameo St
$ 472.56
0202291180000
CHEN, NINA XIAONING
7057 Garnet St
$ 271.68
0202293080000
RAMIREZ, MANUEL
9015 La Vine St
$ 252.98
0202294010000
NICHOLSON, RYAN M
9056 La Vine St
$ 181.78
0202307170000
HARSONO, BINTANG
8821 Avalon St
$ 306.78
0202322150000
RAMIREZ, JAVIER TRUST 11/30/16
9182 Cielito St
$ 436.19
0202322180000
HARVEY, JOHN C
9152 Cielito St
$ 472.56
0202332080000
FABELA, BEATRICE B
8620 Mignonette St
$ 274.72
0202341210000
GUTIERREZ, IGNACIO
6868 Billings PI
$ 246.64
0202351080000
HENRICH, CHRISTOPHER
6820 Coral Ct
$ 472.56
0202351110000
BELL, DAVID S
6819 Amber Ct
$ 236.12
0202351210000
SPENCER, CASSIE
6844 Emerald St
$ 317.52
0202351310000
AGUILAR, RIGOBERTO
6867 Carnelian St
$ 471.68
0202351340000
MATHIESEN, DEVEN K
6833 Carnelian St
$ 280.93
0202352150000
HOLMES, GALE GEORGE
8763 Mignonette St
$ 394.30
0202352180000
RIVERA, YENNIE
8793 Mignonette St
$ 261.56
0202371040000
RESENDIZ, JOSE 0
7130 Jasper St
$ 212.04
0202372100000
ORTEGA, FERNANDO R
8668 La Paix St
$ 363.12
0202372200000
NASCIMENTO, IAN
8562 La Paix St
$ 564.96
0202373040000
BRIGHT, MARY BOTTARI REVOC TR 10-07-
7155 Jasper St
$ 196.26
0202376070000
MOODY, KATHERINE R
17121 Napa Ave
$ 425.99
0202392040000
ISCHEIFFELE, KARL P
16938 Eastwood Ave
$ 251.52
Page106
Exhibit 'A'
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
BURRTEC WASTE INDUSTRIES
DELINQUENT SOLID WASTE ACCOUNTS
0202412170000
CASTILLO, JOSEPH M
6880 Cameo St
$ 196.26
0202413020000
JUHASZ, TIBOR
6879 Cameo St
$ 583.56
0202461030000
PACHECO, SUSAN F
8903 Gala Ave
$ 417.30
0202541070000
GLENN, ROBERT A JR
6768 Amber Ct
$ 472.56
0202541240000
SMITH, RICHARD W
8878 Hamilton St
$ 472.56
0202541470000
KENNEDY, JANE
8892 Gala Ave
$ 372.56
0202571320000
TAN, BOWEN
6937 Layton St
$ 472.56
0202744040000
RAULYS TRUST 10/24/1995
6821 Sausalito Ct
$ 362.04
0202745170000
SRIWARSIH, SELFI
9043 Wildflower Ct
$ 196.26
0202753010000
VEPA, SRIPADMA REVOCABLE FAM TR 6/1
9085 San Simeon Dr
$ 322.56
0202822300000
CHEN, PEILING
6833 Springview PI
$ 345.16
0202822320000
AZAROVITZ, BRIAN A
6849 Springview PI
$ 355.16
0207022130000
ROSALES, HUGO
7520 Carnelian St
$ 317.68
0207041100000
POTTER, GWENDOLYN V REVOCABLE TR 5/1
7474 Camino Norte
$ 286.28
0207051020000
PINOCHET, YEISI K
7608 Buena Vista Dr
$ 341.68
0207053260000
YORKE, LESMA
7707 Buena Vista Dr
$ 472.56
0207053360000
Sunrise Spring
7717 Buena Vista Dr
$ 386.48
0207112210000
Anthony Vaughn
8230 Foothill Blvd
$ 1,498.20
0207123160000
GIDWANI, KIRAN D
8267 Tapia Via
$ 568.85
0207123180000
LOPEZ, CAESAR ALEXANDER
8251 Tapia Via
$ 472.56
0207123410000
HICKS, LANIETA
8268 Red Hill Country Club Dr
$ 472.56
0207141090000
GONZALEZ, ELSA
8159 Tapia Via
$ 472.56
0207141100000
QUINTERO, RONALD J
8167 Tapia Via
$ 204.89
0207141180000
HARSHA, ROGER G
8223 Tapia Via
$ 239.96
0207161350000
YEUNG, RAYMOND YUE TING
8242 Placida Ct
$ 472.56
0207171120000
VARGAS, JOSE
8213 Avenida Vejar
$ 197.56
0207181360000
CHEN, SHAOHUA
8470 Edwin St
$ 472.56
0207182230000
ALLEN, KEVIN H
8368 Arrow Rte
$ 306.78
0207201040000
SANDERS, LYNDA REVOCABLE LIV TR 11/1
8556 Arrow Rte
$ 372.56
0207241310000
HOUCHIN, ROBERTJ
8137 9th St
$ 898.20
0207241450000
CARDENAS INVESTMENTS LLC
8715 Grove Ave
$ 657.36
0207242070000
DIAZ, JESUS GALICIA
8735 Calaveras Ave
$ 196.26
0207243010000
GONG, WEI
8795 Vinmar Ave
$ 306.78
0207243070000
DING, EDRIC KUANG HENG FAM TR 6/24/
8730 Vinmar Ave
$ 472.56
0207243090000
SANCHEZ, JUANA M
8247 9th St
$ 355.52
0207243110000
CERDA FAMILY TRUST 7/8/13
8255 9th St
$ 458.28
0207262390000
CRISS, SAUNDRA - EST OF
8653 Arrow Rte
$ 245.84
0207342250000
WANG, JUN
8525 Vinmar Ave
$ 517.12
0207351010000
STANTON, PATRICK M JR
8452 Via Ladera
$ 201.40
0207353130000
HUSTED, LEONARD J & SHARON LIVING TR
7443 Via Serena
$ 251.52
0207353290000
MIRANDA, MARK
7452 Via Paraiso
$ 306.78
0207421220000
Solis, Maria
7708 Arroyo Vista Ave
$ 372.56
0207421260000
PARK, JAIMI
7740 Arroyo Vista Ave
$ 306.78
0207422130000
GEORGE FAMILY TRUST 7-23-04
7760 Vineyard Ave
$ 472.56
0207431050000
GARCIA, JOHANNAH L
7850 Vineyard Ave
$ 417.30
0207441140000
ESPINOZA, WILLIAM S FAMILY LIVING TR
7629 El Arco St
$ 472.56
0207454020000
PEREZ, LUIS
8588 Edwin St
$ 196.26
0207531060000
ALDANA, SERGIO E
8754 Edwin St
$ 196.26
0207531090000
ICOBOS, GUSTAVO
18780 Edwin St
1 $ 472.56
0207531380000
IREYES, LAZARO RODRIGUEZ
18434 Chaffee St
1 $ 262.12
Page 107
Exhibit 'A'
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
BURRTEC WASTE INDUSTRIES
DELINQUENT SOLID WASTE ACCOUNTS
0207531420000
CONTRERAS, RAFAEL J R
8755
Hyacinth St
$
422.56
0207531640000
SAMUEL, EDWARD
8755
Comet St
$
218.40
0207531660000
TORRES, VICTOR M
8732
Comet St
$
306.78
0207541020000
Samuel Pang Living Trust
8804
Edwin St
$
252.06
0207541060000
BACALLAO, R & I FAMILY TRUST 3-25-02
8321
Main St
$
472.56
0207541470000
DOSHI, AROON & BHARATI FAMILY
8357
Chaffee St
$
281.56
0207551390000
ABDELGWAD, MOHAMED S
7507
Sunstone Ave
$
472.56
0207551630000
GREEN, GAYLE D
8771
Candlewood St
$
219.76
0207571750000
MDF PROPERTY MANAGEMENT
8411
Foothill Blvd
$
324.52
0207581170000
PESQUEIRA, RICHARD L
8397
Edwin St
$
472.56
0207581350000
LEWIS, ORA
8378
Edwin St
$
355.52
0207591210000
LEMUS, JESUS
8410
Baker Ave
$
1,268.88
0207591430000
RANCHO CONDOS LLC
8470
Moreno Dr #7
$
419.36
0207591510000
RANCHO CONDOS LLC
8464
Ditmar Dr #15
$
252.47
0207591520000
RANCHO CONDOS LLC
8464
Ditmar Dr #16
$
218.44
0207591570000
Rancho Condos
8471
Ditmar Dr #21
$
218.36
0207591620000
RANCHO CONDOS LLC
8480
Carson PI #26
$
358.28
0207601190000
BAIG, MIRZA ALI REZA
7744
Calle Bresca
$
271.56
0207601320000
LEE, NANNIE M TRUST (1-15-05)
7730
Calle Clarin
$
657.36
0207622290000
UGAS, EVA
8573
San Jacinto Ct
$
363.12
0207622430000
YU, ALEXANDRA CHIYIN SZETO
8527
Arrow Rte
$
550.68
0207661050000
SILVA, FRANCISCO J
8168
Highridge PI
$
245.72
0207671060000
ZHANG, YEZI
8206
Highridge PI
$
268.46
0207671110000
XU, YA LIVING TRUST 10-4-12
8716
Timberwood Ct
$
362.84
0207721050000
JAKE, ARDRIA
8059
City View PI
$
306.78
0207721070000
MX INVESTMENT LLC
8063
City View PI
$
196.26
0207721170000
DEER, SALEM
8733
Olive Tree Dr
$
209.63
0207722020000
WU, SISI
8039
City View PI
$
472.56
0207722490000
MARX, LUIGI
8047
Cresta Bella Rd
$
314.15
0207731520000
MEAN, CHAN
8692
9th St #52
$
323.17
0207741040000
ADAY, YONG TAN
8548
Cava Dr
$
229.42
0207741070000
CHEN, WEN CHENG
8558
Cava Dr
$
215.43
0207741110000
ELYSEES LLC
8570
Cava Dr
$
464.96
0207741310000
HE, LIZHENG
8553
Cava Dr
$
210.52
0207742050000
LI, JIANPING
8616
Cava Dr
$
417.30
0207742130000
COLLINS, NICOLE K
8636
Cava Dr
$
385.60
0207742400000
DU, LEI
8635
Cava Dr
$
479.93
0207742470000
LI, CON WU
8607
Cava Dr
$
306.78
0208073410000
PULICARI, MICHAEL
7609
Lion St
$
376.86
0208123040000
CONTRERAS, EMMANUEL
7840
Jadeite Ave
$
362.04
0208124050000
BUNCH, PAUL E
7850
Klusman Ave
$
187.56
0208141420000
CHANDLER, DARREN
9328
Foothill Blvd
$
472.56
0208141500000
REMEDIOS, LALITA M REVOCABLE TR 12/1
9455
San Bernardino Rd
$
472.56
0208142010000
SOLANO, MARILYN L
9441
Barstow Dr #101
$
352.52
0208142130000
Villahermosa Family Trust 07/1
9467
Barstow Dr #103
$
275.76
0208142370000
Zeng, Dafang
9468
Jack Rabbit Dr #104
$
440.37
0208143070000
RODRIGUEZ, ANDRES LUIS
9445
Jack Rabbit Dr #107
$
246.76
0208143560000
ASHKAR, BERNARD E
8074
Joplin PI #105
$
239.08
0208151430000
IKOSIER, LE LIE CHOU
18031
Pueblo PI
$
246.76
0208152190000
1 CUCAMONGA COUNTY WATER DISTRIC
18055
Klusman Ave
$
752.64
Page108
Exhibit 'A'
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
BURRTEC WASTE INDUSTRIES
DELINQUENT SOLID WASTE ACCOUNTS
0208261140000
RHW PHARMICON INC
9533
Foothill Blvd
$
348.27
0208261400000
KIM, JAMES
9461
Foothill Blvd
$
486.20
0208272600000
LOPEZ, JAVIER F
9446
Friant St
$
472.56
0208281050000
KAVIKAM LLC
8219
Archibald Ave
$
272.56
0208281190000
AYALA, ARTHUR J JR AND LAVERNE R
8177
Archibald Ave
$
362.04
0208282060000
TRASCHLER, JACQUELINE J
9804
Hampshire St
$
417.30
0208283130000
KENNEDY, SHAWN M
8206
Malven Ave
$
306.68
0208291020000
GRABER, JANICE Y
9786
Arrow Rte
$
564.96
0208291130000
ROSS, STEPHEN M
9763
Placer St
$
196.26
0208291340000
VILLALVAZO, FRANCISCO
9745
Cerise St
$
282.32
0208302030000
SHEEHAN FAMILY TRUST 09/09/98
8255
Malven Ave
$
363.12
0208302050000
NAVAZI, FRANCISCO
8233
Malven Ave
$
196.26
0208303200000
CAVENDER, SLYVIA A
8278
Ramona Ave
$
422.56
0208331270000
YORKSHIRE GROUP LIMITED PARTNE
10123 Foothill Blvd
$
369.66
0208353100000
SYB FAMILY TRUST 04/30/91
10709 Foothill Blvd
$
566.31
0208355300000
WHITE OAK COMMERCIAL LLC
8241 White Oak Ave
$
409.42
0208363310000
Rodriguez, Manuel
9180
Arrow Rte
$
455.52
0208377060000
HARMON, JASEN M
8215
Jadeite Ave
$
306.78
0208382020000
BLACK, FRANK P AND MARTHA M TR
9560
Devon St
$
472.56
0208388110000
WOODSIDE, PATRICIA A
9679
Devon St
$
251.52
0208391030000
GALINDO, ANTONIO HERIBERTO
7906
Montara Ave
$
564.96
0208392030000
CASTELLANOS, LUIS
7921
Selma Ave
$
251.52
0208421090000
LOLA, MARIA E
9385
Palo Alto St
$
564.96
0208424120000
IBARRA, LORIE
7425
Kirkwood Ave
$
196.26
0208431270000
VINCENT MAYA COMPANY
9315
Baseline Rd
$
536.02
0208432090000
ESTRADA, ANTHONY
7375
Layton St
$
471.78
0208433140000
MOORE, CEDRIC A
9391
Pepper St
$
322.56
0208441110000
LIM, BERNARD
8980
Balsa St
$
472.56
0208442130000
CONTRERAS, WENDIE
7575
Zircon Ave
$
252.04
0208462010000
LEWIS, JANAE
7925
Lion St
$
472.56
0208491040000
BLEDSOE, ROBERT
9343
Church St
$
199.36
0208491250000
CERTIFIED PROPERTIES LLC
9342
Hemlock St
$
229.13
0208502050000
KING, KENYON M LIVING TRUST 12-10-0
9100
Hemlock St
$
564.96
0208502080000
RYAN, RICHARD REVOCABLE TR 12/17/15
7739
Beryl St
$
472.56
0208511070000
HUFFER, DANIELLE MARIE
7745
Montara Ave
$
196.78
0208531090000
FALLON, PATRICK E
9440
Hemlock St
$
417.30
0208533030000
COURTNEY, EDWARD E
7810
Amethyst Ave
$
472.56
0208533050000
FOOTE, KAREN C
7830
Amethyst Ave
$
408.37
0208543120000
LIEBHERR, ERIK L
7425
Amethyst Ave
$
276.56
0208561090000
YANG, RUMENG
7534
Layton St
$
251.52
0208561210000
SERNA, ROBERT M
7656
Layton St
$
196.26
0208561280000
SANCHEZ, OSCAR
9444
Church St
$
356.78
0208563090000
MARTINEZ, DEBORAH
7595
Amethyst Ave
$
491.16
0208571100000
TIM, BUNTHOEUN S
7605
Leucite Ave
$
263.72
0208593180000
BELAND, LYNETTE CHALCRAFT
7398
Beryl St
$
472.56
0208622180000
LAUNCHBAUGH FAMILY LIVING TRUS
10759 Civic Center Dr
$
980.36
0208632230000
MARYLIN MILLER TRUST, FAUNA FOUNDATION
8037
Orangewood Dr
$
472.56
0208651070000
GUTIERREZ, ELVIA
7924
Kirkwood Ct
$
472.56
0208651130000
Asgharzadeh, Mehdi
17925
Kirkwood Ct
1 $
224.05
0208703110000
IMUNOZ, JOSE MARIA
17775
Leucite Ave
1 $
472.56
Page109
Exhibit 'A'
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
BURRTEC WASTE INDUSTRIES
DELINQUENT SOLID WASTE ACCOUNTS
0208703260000
COPELAND, ANDREW D
9605 Langston St
$ 200.79
0208752260000
FAYTROUNI, KHALED
7953 Summerlin PI
$ 472.56
0208761330000
MORALES, JAIME
8287 Helms Ave
$ 247.72
0208761870000
LANINI, JEREMY
8278 Kirkwood Ct
$ 472.56
0208772210000
2013-1 IH BORROWER LP
9309 Placer St
$ 435.13
0208772300000
LEE, DONG 1
9395 Placer St
$ 411.66
0208772460000
RUHL, FRANCINE
9359 Konocti St
$ 417.30
0208772510000
ORTIZ, ROSE
8403 Helms Ave
$ 472.56
0208772630000
NGO, VINH
9441 Devon St
$ 306.78
0208772830000
GRAMATA, MITCHELL
9491 Placer St
$ 196.26
0208772920000
WACHTER, JASON D
9445 Konocti St
$ 214.96
0208801260000
OSTOS, LEONARDO P JR
9504 Placer St
$ 228.78
0208801290000
DAM BRA, MARIA J
9521 Placer St
$ 491.16
0208811320000
COLEMAN, CHARLES
8454 Klusman Ave
$ 352.98
0208811510000
FISHER, SCOTT
8435 Malachite Ave
$ 206.78
0208811540000
Garibay, Irene
9522 Friant St
$ 197.40
0208831250000
BAKIRCI, AIRMAN
7844 Winery Ridge Dr
$ 411.68
0208831300000
OLIN FAMILY TRUST3-23-92
9017 Chianti Ct
$ 215.49
0208831410000
GARLAND FAMILY TRUST 2018
9007 Dubonnet Dr
$ 230.28
0208831690000
CHANG, SUSAN TZU HAN
7924 Sauterne Dr
$ 472.56
0208851200000
Willette, Peter
8202 Kinlock Ave
$ 472.56
0208901500000
PERSSON, TREVOR A
9124 Chelsea Ct
$ 306.78
0208901560000
ZAPIRTAN, GABRIEL
8264 Avenida Leon
$ 196.26
0208901720000
LONG, BONNIE J
8264 Eastwood Ave
$ 239.23
0208911220000
PREMIUM 38 PROPERTY INVESTMENT
8381 Montara Ave
$ 428.38
0208921090000
VREM, DONAVAN R REVOCABLE LIV TR
7444 Avila Ave
$ 417.30
0208931260000
WU, KEVIN H
9003 Yew St
$ 472.56
0208931480000
HUNTER, PAUL
7678 Zircon Ave
$ 444.30
0208931550000
GONZALEZ, JOSE MIGUEL
8904 Azurite Ave
$ 362.04
0208991110000
ANUCHITTANANANT, WATTANCHAI
7849 Centennial PI
$ 306.78
0208991180000
CHEN, DANQING
9330 Majesty Dr
$ 416.41
0208991380000
HERBERT, NATHANIEL
9360 Tryon St
$ 472.56
0209013380000
FISKE LEAPWOOD FLOWER LLC
8740 Flower Rd
$ 1,565.83
0209013680000
ON VINEYARD LLC
8840 Flower Rd
$ 1,995.05
0209013700000
G & A INVESTMENT GRP
8833 Flower Rd
$ 1,721.08
0209032090000
878 Onyx LLC
8787 Onyx Ave
$ 3,230.96
0209032270000
CUCAMONGA INDUSTRIAL CENTER LL
8748 Industrial Ln
$ 931.04
0209052090000
GONZALEZ, DAVID
9845 Jersey Blvd
$ 215.90
0209062230000
NORTH TOWN HOUSING DEVELOPMENT
9801 Main St
$ 251.52
0209063130000
GUERRERO, RAMIRO JOSEPH
9896 Main St
$ 218.46
0209063170000
GOMEZ, RAFAEL VALLE
9866 Main St
$ 251.52
0209063210000
SAVOCCHIO, LORRAINE M
9838 Main St
$ 605.83
0209063230000
SOLIS, HENRIETTA
9824 Main St
$ 244.24
0209101370000
PEREZ, GILBERT L
10158 25th St
$ 208.57
0209102090000
GOLGOTHA SANCTUARY MINISTRY
10171 25th St
$ 288.52
0209102100000
TCHOUANCHE, PATRICK L TONGANBOU
10179 25th St
$ 423.64
0209102190000
AMBRIZ, SYLVIA
10150 24th St
$ 196.26
0209111030000
SALINAS, MILTON
10131 24th St
$ 196.26
0209121310000
1ARSHAWSKY FAMILY TRUST
110390 26th St
$ 564.96
0209143110000
JKARUBIAN, RALPH TRUST (2005)
110865 Jersey Blvd
1 $ 608.48
Page 110
Exhibit 'A'
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
BURRTEC WASTE INDUSTRIES
DELINQUENT SOLID WASTE ACCOUNTS
0209143130000
KARUBIAN, RALPH TRUST 8-17-05
8866 White Oak Ave
$
585.63
0209145020000
10955 ARROW LP
10955 Arrow Rte
$
4,166.97
0209171060000
CARRARI, MIGUEL & VICTORIA FAM TR -
9397
8th St
$
599.37
0209171390000
PRIHISZTAL, EVA 2014 REVOCABLE TR 1-
9353
8th St
$
481.53
0209242050000
RANCHO CUCAMONGA LOT 5 LLC
10479 8th St
$
345.10
0209281150000
CARRILLO, ROBERTO
8660
Ramona Ave
$
296.00
0209281170000
ROSALES, MARCIAL
8678
Ramona Ave
$
372.56
0209284050000
DEATER, RICHARD E
8525
Ramona Ave
$
455.52
0209292430000
DE LEON, MARTHA
9403
Deerbrook St
$
186.26
0209294030000
SWANGEL, MARK W
9243
Amethyst Ave
$
201.52
0209295010000
GRIJALVA, NAOMI
9396
6th St
$
472.56
0209301110000
HUANG, DONGFANG
8560 Willow Dr
$
540.93
0209303090000
SPAINHOUR, KENNETH
9984
Alpine St
$
472.56
0209303100000
SANTIAGO, RENATO
9978
Alpine St
$
362.04
0209303240000
CASTRO, JOSE A
10024 Salina St
$
252.98
0209311080000
JOHNSON, RACHEL L LIVING TR 05/06/19
8674 Willow Dr
$
191.00
0209312040000
ORTIZ, ANTONIO
8634
Fernwood Dr
$
471.68
0209312180000
YIN, TIEGANG
8620
Pine Dr
$
472.56
0209312570000
RICHARD, JAMES C
8670
Cedar Dr
$
212.12
0209312690000
KHANNA, DEEPAK
10035 Mckinley St
$
300.00
0209312740000
DEBACA, ANACANI DORINA
10073 Mckinley St
$
435.39
0209321130000
LAY LIVING TRUST 12/10/15
9252
Malachite Ave
$
346.45
0209341060000
GOMEZ, MARIA S
9149
Amethyst Ave
$
472.56
0209341070000
ESPINOZA, WILLIAM S
9141
Amethyst Ave
$
362.04
0209341520000
RUIZ, GUILLERMINA HERNANDEZ
9420
Cameron St
$
332.57
0209361040000
LAG UNAS, MARY D
9165
Jadeite Ave
$
314.96
0209361050000
VARGAS, GRISELDA
9155
Jadeite Ave
$
306.78
0209361170000
ALARCON, MANUEL D
9598
Edelweiss St
$
196.26
0209361250000
MINNIS, EARL TRUST 5-13-1991
9655
Edelweiss St
$
306.78
0209361260000
RAMOS, GEORGE L
9656
Cameron St
$
347.08
0209361600000
QUINTEROS, JOSE JESUS
9571
Edelweiss St
$
363.12
0209411120000
YIHUA TIMBER INDUSTRY (USA) IN
10808 6th St
$
1,570.11
0209411240000
DLR HOLDINGS 1 LLC
9267
Haven Ave
$
1,345.98
0209431070000
NGUYEN, PHU
8676
Andover PI
$
472.56
0209431280000
OAXACA, CANDICE A
8621
Andover PI
$
472.56
0209442580000
GONZALEZ, JON
8654
San Miguel PI
$
385.56
0209452280000
CLAY, ANDREW
9249
Rancho Park PI
$
362.27
0209452320000
JOINER NETWORK CORPORATION
9263
Rancho Park PI
$
472.56
0209452340000
NI, YAXI
9275
Rancho Park PI
$
472.56
0209491700000
HARSEN, GAIL M SURV TRUST(8-2-84)TR
10824 Edison Ct
$
338.51
0209553490000
SEE, WAN RU
8662
Harvest PI
$
219.43
0209554160000
SANCHEZ, CYNTHIA
10325 Sparkling Dr
$
196.26
0209556080000
AUSTIN, FERNANDO
10385 Plumeria Ct #2
$
458.28
0210013010000
LAIRD PROPERTIES
9430
Lucas Ranch Rd
$
1,918.59
0210071350000
SMARTWAY CORPORATION
9621
Lucas Ranch Rd
$
454.26
0210071450000
BIANE, PHILO PIERRE & CAROLYN TR 10/
10040 4th St
$
931.88
0210071510000
WOO, JACK
9881
6th St
$
2,511.12
0210381160000
WOLHAUPTER LIVING TRUST 8/30/8
9546
Commerce Center Dr
$
801.26
0210461030000
FLORES, LEOBARDO
19440
Shadowbrook Dr
11$
472.56
0210461670000
JWU, JAMIE J
19446
Poppyfield Ct
1 $
295.56
Page111
Exhibit 'A'
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
BURRTEC WASTE INDUSTRIES
DELINQUENT SOLID WASTE ACCOUNTS
0210471160000
WU, YI HUI
9626 Heatherbrook PI
$ 472.56
0210471180000
YAN, HUI
9379 Shadowgrove Dr
$ 362.04
0210471190000
LATY CALIFORNIA LLC
9387 Shadowgrove Dr
$ 362.04
0210471470000
FENG, XIAOFEN
9457 Shadowgrove Dr
$ 564.96
0210472190000
HSIEH, ROBERT
9394 Live Oak Dr
$ 306.78
0210472350000
GAIA PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC
9415 Homestead Dr
$ 472.56
0210481360000
WANG & LI FAMILY TRUST 9/29/16
9507 Cedar Glen Ct
$ 417.30
0210481660000
WANG, BING BING
9547 Brook Dr
$ 440.44
0210491110000
WANG, HONG
9376 Brookview Ct
$ 472.56
0210491200000
POON, MAN YAN
9397 Morning Breeze Dr
$ 227.46
0210511310000
MA, YONG
9409 Sunglow Ct
$ 306.78
0210511330000
JA&H LLC
9414 Sunglow Ct
$ 317.04
0210512220000
MACK, GORDON L III
9427 Sun Meadow Ct
$ 306.78
0210512410000
LYU, XINWANG
9472 Cedar Glen Ct
$ 472.56
0210561290000
FEI, FEI
9375 Stoneybrock PI
$ 564.96
0210561430000
CHAT, MICHAEL
9358 Stoneybrock PI
$ 196.26
0210641520000
DONG & XU FAMILY TRUST 2/22/16
9360 Bistro PI
$ 251.52
0210641550000
BIN, TAO
9330 Bistro PI
$ 472.56
0210643100000
VILLAGOMEZ, RICHARD & PAN YING FAMIL
9337 Culinary PI
$ 210.97
0210644170000
XIA, MING
9626 Seasons Dr
$ 491.15
0210644270000
GLORY HOMES LLC
9342 Greenbelt PI
$ 251.52
0210671080000
DAI, FANG
11026 Getaway Dr
$ 217.65
0225032070000
BAHAM, MICHEEE
13532 Gypsum Dr
$ 196.26
0225122510000
HALL, PRICE W
6061 Summit Ln
$ 294.28
0225122810000
GORMAN, JULIA A
13053 23rd St
$ 211.66
0225122840000
BENNETT, SCOT A
13284 Banyan St
$ 1,421.67
0225123150000
BEAGLEY, JOSEPH & CAROL FAMILY TRUST
12946 23rd St
$ 315.20
0225221440000
MORRISON, STEVEN P
11526 Mammoth Peak Ct
$ 378.89
0225231070000
HE, JIE
11323 Mount Wallace Ct
$ 417.30
0225231440000
TUNDIDOR, MARLA M
11362 Pyramid Peak Ct
$ 362.04
0225241200000
ARAUJO, MICHAEL T
11639 Mount Rainier Ct
$ 323.64
0225241230000
GLOVER, MARY M
11619 Mount Rainier Ct
$ 472.56
0225251370000
STARKEY, GERALD A
6406 Eagle Peak PI
$ 397.56
0225251380000
THOMPSON, KATHERINE M REV TR 9/11/08
6400 Eagle Peak PI
$ 362.04
0225261490000
ABRAIRA, JOSE
11542 Mount Baldwin Ct
$ 277.93
0225261520000
SHEONARINE, HARRY & BIBI REV TR 10-2
11522 Mount Baldwin Ct
$ 201.68
0225261820000
BRAME, CHARLES
11570 Mount Hood Ct
$ 363.12
0225271060000
RODRIGUEZ, FRANKLIN
11473 Mount Ritter St
$ 225.76
0225271320000
LIANG, CHANG-PIN BRIAN
11424 Mount Ritter St
$ 262.04
0225281210000
MARTINEZ, DAVID M
6430 Mount Rushmore PI
$ 472.56
0225291150000
ALVAREZ, CHRISTOPHER M
11850 Mount Harvard Ct
$ 211.66
0225291510000
CHAVEZ, DANIEL MICHAEL TRUST 10-04-1
11810 Mount Gunnison Ct
$ 291.80
0225301250000
CASTILLO FAMILY TRUST 5/19/17
11754 Mount Wilson Ct
$ 472.56
0225301480000
MORAR, CHRISTOPHER J
11891 Mount Wilson Ct
$ 211.66
0225312220000
DIAZGRANADOS, VERONICA REV LIFETIME
11825 Mount Royal Ct
$ 556.26
0225312560000
RAYMOND, BRIAN KIRK
11890 Mount Everett Ct
$ 472.56
0225321080000
PHILLIPS, DARRYL
6429 Calico Peak PI
$ 564.96
0225321290000
TEDMORI TRUST 6/16/04
11821 Antler Peak Ct
$ 362.04
0225321370000
ITHR CALIFORNIA L P
111869 Antler Peak Ct
$ 292.50
0225331360000
JZHANG, YUANYUAN
112511 Vista Verde Dr
$ 472.56
Page 112
Exhibit 'A'
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
BURRTEC WASTE INDUSTRIES
DELINQUENT SOLID WASTE ACCOUNTS
0225341120000
NUNEZ, STACY C
12724 Arena Dr
$ 472.56
0225391010000
GREATHOUSE, TRACIE
6116 Roberts PI
$ 472.56
0225391210000
BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON (TR)
12979 Banyan St
$ 608.50
0225411090000
RUSSO LIVING TRUST 11/25/19
6338 Show Horse Way
$ 564.96
0225431020000
LIN, GARY & ANNE LIVING TR 09/18/0
12418 High Horse Dr
$ 472.56
0225452200000
ZHENG, HAO
6332 Tribeca Ct
$ 362.04
0225465090000
WU, YONGYUAN
6342 Carnaby Ct
$ 211.66
0225501260000
POMPONIO, EDWARD ROSS
11958 Pine Mountain Ct
$ 212.52
0225511010000
WANG, YAO HSIN
5930 Etiwanda Ave
$ 420.32
0225601220000
RIOS, BRENDA C
6272 Laurel Blossom PI
$ 564.96
0225621240000
SANCHEZ, JEFFREY SEP PROP TRUST 1/20
12195 Roseville Dr
$ 472.56
0225653100000
ZHANG-CHEN TRUST 9/6/06
12355 Split Rein Dr
$ 199.07
0225653140000
HPA BORROWER 2016-2 LLC
5846 Greyville PI
$ 196.26
0225701140000
CHEN, TAIWEI
12203 Blue Spruce Dr
$ 251.52
0225721460000
RAY, JOSEPH
12283 Split Rein Dr
$ 220.39
0225721500000
GONG, LI
12248 Split Rein Dr
$ 472.56
0225751060000
BOSE, BRIAN
6180 Taylor Canyon PI
$ 262.04
0225751150000
SALGUERO, RIGOBERTO
12350 Lusitano Ct
$ 322.56
0225781110000
VELASQUEZ, ROBERT
6225 Carrotwood Ct
$ 362.04
0225791030000
LIU, RUI
6257 Shore Pine Ct
$ 472.56
0225851080000
MOORE, BRYANT
12529 Churchill Dr
$ 472.56
0226211310000
KENYON, STEVEN V
13982 Claremont Ln
$ 191.16
0226221250000
GUTIERREZ, CRISTIAN
13956 Annandale Ln
$ 408.89
0226222210000
2018-1 IH BORROWER LP
14058 Crescenta Way
$ 417.30
0226231340000
LIU, YI
13937 San Dimas Ln
$ 306.78
0226231560000
MEDEL, JULIO
14059 Hastings Ranch Ln
$ 472.56
0226231580000
LI, GUANLIN
14072 Hastings Ranch Ln
$ 472.56
0226241250000
YANG, YONGBO
5683 Alhambra Ct
$ 472.56
0226251150000
DENG, MINLI
14112 Los Robles Ct
$ 363.64
0226261560000
USITA, VILLAMOR R
14065 Crestline PI
$ 251.52
0226272090000
CRUZ, MARIANO & IRENE REVOCABLE LIV
14087 Glendale Ct
$ 196.26
0226272280000
CHAVEZ, BERNARD P JR
14108 San Gabriel Ct
$ 211.66
0226272350000
WU, PETER YAU TAK
14089 Crestline PI
$ 472.56
0226301050000
BLUMENTHAL, JOSHUA ALLEN
14201 Ross Ct
$ 399.18
0226301110000
BROWN, DAMOND E
5840 San Sevaine Rd
$ 307.90
0226301390000
LEE, HERBERT K
14036 Hickcox Ln
$ 445.97
0226322100000
ROA, VINCENT B JR
14081 Hoppe Dr
$ 249.82
0226432240000
DE SILVA, JOSEPH
13861 Laurel Tree Dr
$ 657.36
0226432580000
LIANG, XIAOFENG
13980 Laurel Tree Dr
$ 251.52
0226502240000
DAVILA, SAMUEL
6152 Grovewood PI
$ 422.56
0226502540000
YAN, YANG
13938 Dove Canyon Way
$ 211.14
0226512010000
ZHU, FUHUA
13827 Hummingbird Way
$ 201.70
0226512330000
REYES, ARTURO V
6075 Purisima PI
$ 251.52
0226523130000
EDWARDS, BRANDON E
13805 Soledad Way
$ 423.64
0226532020000
VANDERWALKER, DEBORAH ELAINE
5729 Nutwood PI
$ 211.32
0226532060000
RADEMAKER TRUST 8-14-91
13752 Santa Lucia Ct
$ 279.15
0226622030000
CAMPOS, DESIREE
6237 Raindrop PI
$ 352.98
0226631080000
HIDALG0, MARTHA A
13999 San Segundo Dr
$ 472.56
0226651170000
GILMARTIN, JOSEPH
15215 Gallo Ct
1 $ 564.96
0226651380000
IHADDAD, BASEL
114101 Vai Brothers Dr
1 $ 196.26
Page 113
Exhibit 'A'
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
BURRTEC WASTE INDUSTRIES
DELINQUENT SOLID WASTE ACCOUNTS
0226671040000
DICESARE, MICHAEL MARK
14211 Vai Brothers Dr
$ 306.78
0226671380000
Z & F INVESTMENT GROUP LLC
5004 Cervetti Ave
$ 352.56
0226792230000
ZHU, MENG
5121 Bucklestone PI
$ 251.52
0227012050000
ZHOU, LINGYUN
7119 Green Glen Ct
$ 472.56
0227012260000
KUNG, VIVIEN
13209 Lima Dr
$ 355.55
0227012290000
ZHANG, XIAOMEI
13223 Lima Dr
$ 251.52
0227061660000
GIBBONS, CHARLES E
12920 Victoria St
$ 568.08
0227141350000
$PO0227-141-35-0000
13601 Victoria St
$ 223.13
0227192160000
HORN, TYRONE R
13473 Windy Grove Dr
$ 564.96
0227193170000
GORAN, MARILYN REVOCABLE TRUST 9/17/
13509 Williamson Rd
$ 472.56
0227244200000
MERLOS, JORGE L
13265 Catalpa St
$ 564.96
0227253010000
WENDELIN FAMILY TRUST 10/26/01
13005 Larrera St
$ 472.56
0227253060000
CHEN, ZHENGRONG
13067 Larrera St
$ 226.07
0227256040000
LINE, BRANDON P
13091 Vista St
$ 564.96
0227259110000
MOLLINEDO, WALTER OSWALDO JR
13040 Pinon St
$ 233.10
0227382090000
GONZALEZ FAMILY REVOCABLE TRUS
6929 Sand Creek Ct
$ 417.30
0227472090000
TANG FAMILY A+ HOLDINGS LLC
6513 Dicarlo PI
$ 612.72
0227504020000
SACKLEY, STUART
12932 Carnesi Dr
$ 520.32
0227582160000
ZHANG, PU
7161 East Ave #48
$ 405.40
0227582570000
BARREIRO, GEORGE L
7161 East Ave #18
$ 496.66
0227582580000
HUANG, KUAN DA
7161 East Ave #19
$ 326.08
0227583180000
7161 East Ave Trust 01072011
7161 East Ave #72
$ 458.28
0227583270000
HARDY, BONNIE S REV TR 4/03/97
7161 East Ave #106
$ 246.76
0227583290000
HASSOUN, AHMAN TANAL
7161 East Ave #108
$ 266.05
0227682170000
TOLLEY, JOE M SR
13025 Via Regallo Dr
$ 208.94
0227693340000
ZHU, XIAOYI
7123 Pasture Ct
$ 564.96
0227732010000
RADFORD, ROBERT OWEN
13606 Jeremy Ct
$ 200.32
0227741120000
GREATHOUSE, ROBERT E
13543 Smokestone St
$ 211.66
0227742110000
VAZQUEZ, NESTOR LUIS SANCHEZ
13656 Smokestone St
$ 417.30
0227751210000
XIONG, YANHONG
6633 Brownstone PI
$ 247.95
0227821250000
ANTONUCCI, JIMMY B
6550 Egglestone PI
$ 472.56
0227821380000
BUSH, PENELOPE
6538 Brownstone PI
$ 251.52
0227821410000
LIU, FUQIANG
6572 Brownstone PI
$ 251.52
0229012190000
YNS ENTERPRISE NO 1 LLC
8160 Masi Dr
$ 309.32
0229012350000
YNS Enterprise LLC
8200 Masi Dr
$ 926.01
0229012380000
RC RETAIL PARTNERS LLC
11399 Foothill Blvd
$ 208.52
0229012560000
HNL LI MILLIKEN LLC
8108 Milliken Ave
$ 465.72
0229031390000
THM ENTERPRISE LLC
12499 Foothill Blvd
$ 1,211.80
0229031410000
THM ENTERPRISE LLC
12449 Foothill Blvd
$ 260.24
0229141130000
TOWER OF POWER CORP
8585 Etiwanda Ave
$ 2,168.29
0229162140000
KULAR TRUCK LINE INC
12949 Whittram Ave
$ 327.96
0229171050000
JIMENEZ FAMILY TRUST 08/30/17
8525 Pecan Ave
$ 186.52
0229192110000
WALKER FAMILY TRUST 7/14/11
13107 Whittram Ave
$ 264.60
0229262470000
ERS PARTNERS LP
9029 Rochester Ave
$ 350.84
0229263070000
DH CHARLES SMITH LLC
9208 Charles Smith Ave
$ 1,046.30
0229263950000
OZEL DEVELOPING INC
11400 4th St
$ 618.65
0229283720000
REXFORD INDUSTRIAL REALTY L P
12320 4th St
$ 2,622.04
0229301030000
HORTON, JOHN
13080 Vine St
$ 181.34
0229302110000
MILIAN, ANTHONY
113060 Chestnut Ave
$ 472.56
0229305190000
ISALAS, ESTEVAN
18131 Cornwall Ave
$ 211.66
Page 114
Exhibit 'A'
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
BURRTEC WASTE INDUSTRIES
DELINQUENT SOLID WASTE ACCOUNTS
0229312050000
HERNANDEZ, FRANCISCO J
8226 Morton Ave
$ 196.25
0229313160000
ROBILLARD, MILDRED
8256 Emmett Ave
$ 564.96
0229451180000
WANG, HAO
8478 Bullhead Ct
$ 355.80
0229461390000
SHEN, XIAOYAN
13186 Flagstaff Dr
$ 472.56
0229461580000
WANG, HONGBIN
13181 Joliet Dr
$ 333.49
0229462080000
CHEN, WANG
13281 Joliet Dr
$ 251.52
0229471290000
DOU, XIAOXUE
13201 Baxter Springs Dr
$ 266.60
0229471390000
GHAZARIAN, SARA
8495 Kingman Ct
$ 343.30
0229471500000
RAMOS, DANIEL
13206 Baxter Springs Dr
$ 564.96
0229471610000
JI, JIAPENG
13283 Chatham Dr
$ 534.16
0229481150000
ZHU, HAN
13160 Winslow Dr
$ 476.68
0229481260000
LI, BAI
13270 Winslow Dr
$ 251.52
0229481430000
WANG, LIJUN
13257 Oatman Dr
$ 362.04
0229481460000
CHENG, QI
13217 Oatman Dr
$ 306.78
0229481510000
CUI, NA
13167 Oatman Dr
$ 206.78
0229482060000
ZHAO, WENHAO
13176 Oatman Dr
$ 472.56
0229482210000
YANG, ZHIJAN
13153 Stanton Dr
$ 461.86
0229482410000
HU, HAIBO
13205 Winslow Dr
$ 472.56
1043131080000
GWAY, JEFFREY J
5804 Turquoise Ave
$ 214.86
1043144020000
VAZQUEZ, JOSE L
8100 Sunflower Ave
$ 199.72
1061051060000
FLORES, RAMIRO SR
8083 Surrey Ln
$ 217.30
1061071050000
BALLAY, GWENDOLYN HEATHER
5297 Della Ave
$ 436.72
1061071060000
RIZVI, RAZA
5285 Della Ave
$ 472.56
1061071070000
CHILI, DARIN
5271 Della Ave
$ 362.04
1061071090000
BRADLEY, JULIE KATHLEEN
5243 Della Ave
$ 424.62
1061111210000
ALONSO, JOSE
5320 Carol Ave
$ 496.83
1061111260000
OLSON, AL
8107 Whirlaway St
$ 302.04
1061121060000
GRAVES, EDWARD J
8148 Surrey Ln
$ 472.56
1061121200000
GARDNER, MATTHEW P
8150 Vinmar Ct
$ 472.56
1061141310000
BERGREEN, KATHERINE SUSAN FAM TR 2/2
5392 Via Serena
$ 330.66
1061172100000
HERNANDEZ, ROBERT
8348 Almond St
$ 584.67
1061201330000
BANACKY, MONICA C
5070 Via Serena
$ 503.28
1061221250000
MIRANDA, JOSE F
8558 La Senda Ct
$ 520.32
1061331210000
EVENRUD, DAVID 0
9013 Caballero Dr
$ 185.98
1061361120000
ALEXANDER, JASON S
9072 Camellia Ct
$ 396.83
1061361190000
ANDERSON, SHARI
8960 Camellia Ct
$ 496.31
1061361360000
BODNAR, JONATHAN A
8926 Hillside Rd
$ 423.92
1061391190000
GIROTH, PAUL
9429 Valley View St
$ 196.26
1061391280000
LEVI, MORDECHAI
9438 Hillside Rd
$ 441.00
1061581270000
ULLOA, NOE H
5681 Amethyst Ave
$ 293.75
1061591070000
ROGERS-PICHOTTA, SHARON P FM TR 1/05
9315 Hillside Rd
$ 251.52
1061651030000
HUFFORD, CECELIA M
8743 Beechwood Dr
$ 417.30
1061691020000
MARTINEZ, ANDY J
5657 Sapphire St
$ 295.32
1061691120000
GUZMAN, LEONARDO J
5675 Sapphire St
$ 472.56
1061731310000
RUTHERFORD, DAVID H
5621 Turquoise Ave
$ 564.96
1061771080000
ARAGON, THOMAS JR
9138 Hidden Farm Rd
$ 306.78
1061791170000
FAKHOURY, BAKHIT
5071 Castle Ct
$ 223.64
1061801130000
FLORES, JOSUE
4974 Laredo PI
$ 583.56
1062091080000
MESA, ADAM
15791 Jadeite Ave
$ 211.66
1062101340000
INIELSEN, EDDY B
15846 Hillside Cove
$ 381.72
Page 115
Exhibit 'A'
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
BURRTEC WASTE INDUSTRIES
DELINQUENT SOLID WASTE ACCOUNTS
1062101360000
ORTEGA, MARISOL
5827
Hellman Ave
$
468.00
1062151040000
TATE, ALAN A
8381 Wilson Ct
$
494.30
1062161050000
ZHENG, CHUN YAN
8243
Thoroughbred St
$
446.32
1062191170000
WILLIS, JOHN H TRUST
5949
Trotters Ln
$
235.53
1062232060000
MORAN, CAREY L
5924
Layton St
$
204.22
1062281130000
WONG, RITA YUKA FAMILY TRUST 6/25/1
6088
Garnet St
$
211.66
1062281270000
GU, JINCAI
6087
Vineyard Ave
$
196.26
1062291150000
YEE, WAYNE S
6038
Moonstone Ave
$
306.78
1062351430000
SCHOOLING, WILLIAM D
6164
Amberwood Dr
$
193.42
1062371230000
LEUNG MARITAL TRUST 6/19/81
9036
Mandarin Ave
$
216.16
1062371470000
LI, HONGYU
6148
Balboa Ct
$
472.56
1062371650000
FIG UEROA, MAN UEL S
8915
Mandarin Ave
$
583.56
1062411430000
LUMANAUW, VINOLIA R
9659
Apricot Ave
$
228.64
1062501090000
FUERLE, TORBEN K
6375
Cameo St
$
209.32
1062501410000
KHATCHADOURIAN, ALEXANDER
6321
Via Serena
$
326.92
1062501680000
VANDERKALLEN, CHRISTOPHER A
6333
Sapphire St
$
250.59
1062511370000
BRUMBAUGH, TIFFANY A
6315
Amberwood Dr
$
196.26
1062581140000
CETINA, MARIO A
9381
Somerset Dr
$
364.96
1062591110000
WYSOCKI, SHERRY K
9245
Alta Loma Dr
$
185.98
1062591120000
BROWN, MARVEN
9255
Alta Loma Dr
$
215.04
1062631120000
ABUDAYYEH, SUNDUS
8415
Orange St
$
306.78
1062631130000
VIQUELIA, PATRICIA ANN
8429
Orange St
$
564.96
1062631610000
YAZOURI, JAMAL AHMAD
6487
Citrine St
$
282.32
1062641250000
ANASTASI FAMILY REVOCABLE TR 6
8184
Alta Loma Dr
$
312.22
1062641470000
BISHOP FAMILY TRUST 3-26-05
8289
Alta Loma Dr
$
472.56
1074021140000
JIANG, YONG
9885
Hidden Farm Rd
$
196.26
1074131280000
MOCHIZUKI FAMILY TRURST 11/27/
5207
Mayberry Ave
$
472.56
1074141190000
ORTIZ, ROBERT SILVAS
5243
Ozark Mountain PI
$
460.08
1074171140000
STAUFFER, DONALD J
9775
Peach Tree Ln
$
230.96
1074211010000
KOLTONIUK, NANCY
10015 Hillside Rd
$
509.76
1074231090000
ZHAO, LIN
10139 Vista Grove St
$
330.66
1074241110000
BAKER, DARRYL HERSH
5495
Hermosa Ave
$
193.88
1074251310000
GARTHWAITE FAMILY TRUST 1/31/0
5560
Cardinal PI
$
251.52
1074291100000
ALVAREZ, RYAN GENE
10330 Rancho St
$
317.30
1074411060000
DORIZ, MARK M
10820 Beechwood Dr
$
379.52
1074481190000
CHAVEZ, ROBERT D
10811 Boulder Canyon Rd
$
350.08
1074491090000
E M 0 & R WESTERN GENERAL FINA
10919 Boulder Canyon Rd
$
538.10
1074511130000
HAN, TAO
4964
Roan Ct
$
472.56
1074521170000
BHATIA, SATDEEP S
5122
Equine PI
$
362.04
1074551140000
NATT, ROLLU S
10963 Stallion Way
$
548.16
1074561130000
LIVERY LEASING INC
11065 Ranch Dr
$
472.56
1074611080000
GALEANO, BRAULIO
9876
Summerhill Rd
$
196.26
1074621300000
BOWENS, TRACI
11090 Hidden Trail Dr
$
472.56
1074621440000
LI, JIAJING
4952
Lone Acres Ct
$
306.78
1076031180000
HUNTOON, LAURI
9737
Pleasant View Dr
$
211.66
1076031340000
ROJAS, CLARO
6826
Shadow Ridge PI
$
458.64
1076031400000
LOUIS, KENNETH R
6862
Shadow Ridge PI
$
362.04
1076032280000
BECHARD, JOHN M
6719
Treeline PI
$
352.98
1076032530000
SANTOS, LYDIA T
19737 Willow Wood Dr
1 $
472.56
1076032610000
IMILLER, GEORGIANNE I
19743
Shaded Wood Ct
1 $
472.56
Page 116
Exhibit 'A'
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
BURRTEC WASTE INDUSTRIES
DELINQUENT SOLID WASTE ACCOUNTS
1076041430000
QUINTANA, RONALD B
6775
Pasito Ave
$
294.30
1076041480000
RASOOL, IMTIAZ & ASMA ZAHID 2013 LIV
6752
Ramona Ave
$
216.96
1076042160000
9816 HOLLY STREET TR 2/27/07
9816
Holly St
$
472.56
1076071040000
BROUGHAM, GERALD R
6753
Ramona Ave
$
185.52
1076071050000
XU, PING
9912
Mignonette St
$
497.37
1076081190000
KEY, JASON
9960
Victoria St
$
564.96
1076081210000
TARBET, JEFFREY L
6894
Teak Way
$
564.96
1076081220000
MAHMOUDNEJAD, HASTI
6884
Teak Way
$
417.30
1076091520000
HUANG, DONGFANG
6655
Montresor PI
$
472.56
1076101580000
MACHUCA, JORGE L
6586
Kinlock Ave
$
472.56
1076111070000
MOORE, RUSSELL L
10142 Victoria St
$
306.78
1076131080000
LIVOLSI, LEONARD ANTHONY
6592
Bandola St
$
268.10
1076131340000
TSUGAWA, DENNIS I REVOCABLE TRUST
10448 Finch Ave
$
197.76
1076171350000
TELLO, JUAN C
9832
Chesapeake Dr
$
472.56
1076172260000
CHAMPANY FAMILY TRUST 9-17-18
9763
La Jolla Dr Unit B
$
299.64
1076181080000
NEI, ANTHONY
9863
Yale Dr
$
472.56
1076181280000
FRENKIEL, PAULA E
7044 Wakefield Ct
$
380.48
1076182190000
LU, QI
9749
La Vine Ct
$
306.78
1076182280000
WU, DAN DAN
9738
La Vine Ct
$
407.50
1076182300000
SHAO, XIAO
9758
La Vine Ct
$
282.32
1076182360000
CHENG-ZHENG FAMILY TRUST 9/28/
9792
La Vine Ct
$
421.11
1076182430000
YU, WENER
9860
La Vine Ct
$
429.78
1076182440000
FANG, XIANGMING
9882
La Vine Ct
$
472.56
1076211010000
NEWBOLD, SIDNEY A
9913
Monte Vista St
$
306.78
1076211300000
PAIGE, JEFF C
10044 Monte Vista St
$
372.56
1076221400000
GONZALEZ, LUIS D
7040
Cambridge Ave
$
472.56
1076221640000
ARELLANO, ANNA
7041
Ramona Ave
$
362.04
1076221660000
SANCHEZ, MARCUS JUSTIN
7021
Ramona Ave
$
206.74
1076231320000
CHAO, SHIAO CHIN
7111
Elmhurst Ave
$
196.26
1076231420000
WEIK, DANIEL D
7147
Cambridge Ave
$
383.37
1076231720000
WATSON, STEVE
9948
Albany Ave
$
472.56
1076241430000
DICKINSON-MICHA, THERESA MAE
7231
Teak Way
$
196.26
1076261040000
NELSEN, DARLEEN S REVOCABLE TR 11/8/
7032
Filkins Ave
$
352.98
1076261350000
WEATHERBEE FAMILY IRREVOCABLE
10236 La Vine St
$
472.56
1076261570000
GALLIVAN, JENNIE BELLE FAM TR 10/21/
7017
Filkins Ave
$
289.08
1076301140000
MORALES, MARIO J
10431 Monte Vista St
$
193.32
1076331080000
TEDMORI TRUST 06/16/04
6538
Valinda Ave
$
282.32
1076331180000
CAMERANO, DANIEL R
10665 Finch Ave
$
196.26
1076351180000
T N T TRUST
6733
Valinda Ave
$
196.26
1076351380000
ESPINOSA, JOHN
6785
Valinda Ave
$
211.66
1076361170000
FAUNA FOUNDATION
10547 Mignonette St
$
196.26
1076361410000
HILLSIDE TRUST UDT 7-13-99
6805
Valinda Ave
$
472.56
1076361700000
WONG, CHUN WAI
6814
Palm Dr
$
417.30
1076361760000
FENISON, EDDIE
10621 Holly St
$
352.98
1076401090000
MONTOYA, ARMANDO JR
10827 Sonora Ave
$
306.78
1076401300000
ADAMS, TIMOTHY
6633
San Benito Ave
$
472.56
1076401390000
ZHANG, YUE
6642
San Benito Ave
$
272.56
1076421190000
CANTARERO, ROBERT
6890
Nevada Ct
$
472.56
1076431450000
CARDONA, JORGE
16974
Dakota Ave
1 $
229.68
1076451330000
IWOOD, JAMES
16930
Mendocino PI
1 $
306.78
Page 117
Exhibit 'A'
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
BURRTEC WASTE INDUSTRIES
DELINQUENT SOLID WASTE ACCOUNTS
1076471610000
ROGG, WAYNE
10518 Deerfield Dr
$ 313.92
1076501800000
MALONEY, RYAN P
11074 Kenyon Way
$ 472.56
1076511250000
BAILEY, SEAN T
11054 Shaw St
$ 251.70
1076511300000
LANE, DYLAN RICHARD
11024 Shaw St
$ 228.73
1076511400000
VARELA, EDWARD J
11025 Shaw St
$ 215.04
1076512030000
WHITEHEAD, LOU ANN M
6608 Salem Ct
$ 417.30
1076512350000
BOENDI, MICHAEL A IRREVOC TRUST 3-27
11110 Pacific St
$ 192.30
1076521650000
LI, FEIFEI
11078 Charleston St
$ 472.56
1076522300000
QIAO, YANG
6682 Austin Ct
$ 322.56
1076531590000
DUNN, STEVE
10708 Northview Dr
$ 372.56
1076541440000
WORRELL, JUDY J REV TR (09-1-05)
6654 Camrose PI
$ 472.56
1076541650000
DE LA PAZ, ANGELITO & GLORIA LIV 6-4
6769 Vanderbilt PI
$ 472.56
1076561250000
RUEDA, RICHARD
11269 Cortland St
$ 362.04
1076561440000
RODRIGUEZ, MIRIAM REVOC TRUST 7/3/07
11269 Drake St
$ 226.78
1076561450000
MARTINEZ, ROSA M REVOCABLE TR 8/11/1
11273 Drake St
$ 372.56
1076561580000
PRINCE, CLAUDETTE L
6874 Cabrini Ct
$ 206.84
1076562270000
DARAKJIAN, RAFFI N
6923 Lamar Ct
$ 472.56
1076562590000
MC COY, SHIRLEY E
11178 Amarillo St
$ 326.10
1076571430000
NAKANO, JUSTIN 1
11106 Amarillo St
$ 196.26
1076601300000
HUANG, YUH-SHUN
11132 Amarillo St
$ 472.56
1076621040000
DAVIS, BIBIANA
7015 Drew Ct
$ 262.56
1076641340000
ZHU, SHENGXIAN
11231 Brown Dr
$ 362.04
1076652160000
BORDES, JAMES E
11228 Wingate Dr
$ 472.56
1077011140000
SANCHEZ, MARCUS JUSTIN
7377 Pasito Ave
$ 196.26
1077011430000
HOMESLA LLC
7403 Archibald Ave
$ 490.15
1077021020000
KEYS, VINCENT S
9727 Palo Alto St
$ 251.52
1077021610000
Marroquin, William
7492 Ramona Ave
$ 472.56
1077021750000
ESPINOZA, WILLIAM
7461 Archibald Ave
$ 282.32
1077022160000
JONES, G R 11
9751 Walnut Ct
$ 185.56
1077031120000
LEAMONS, TONY
10062 Palo Alto St
$ 251.52
1077031260000
BERNAL, ALEJANDRO L
10021 Palo Alto St
$ 351.68
1077031920000
ESTRADA, ANTHONY
7475 Ramona Ave
$ 474.12
1077041520000
JAMESON, MICHAEL C
7333 Ramona Ave
$ 196.26
1077041550000
ALVAREZ, DAVID JR
7395 Ramona Ave
$ 399.18
1077051240000
MC MAHAN, MARY LOU
10160 Palo Alto St
$ 472.56
1077061460000
CONTRERAS, EDNA PATRICIA
10276 Magnolia Ct
$ 211.66
1077071160000
TRAVIS, GREGORY D JR
7409 Ivy Ln
$ 251.52
1077071230000
JOHNSON, PATRICIA
10339 Pepper St
$ 472.56
1077081190000
ZHOU, XUEXIAN
7468 Mesada St
$ 472.56
1077081330000
MOFFAT, CAROL A
7411 Marine Ave
$ 494.30
1077101110000
CHEN, XUEHAI
10673 Orange Blossom Dr
$ 189.13
1077122100000
GARDEA, ROBERT C
7323 Cascade Ct
$ 472.56
1077122300000
ETCHART, MARK W & JEANETTE L FAM TRU
7334 Birkdale PI
$ 196.26
1077141500000
COOPER, FREDRICK
7452 Villa Crest PI
$ 472.56
1077141830000
RAMIREZ, RAYMUNDO
7501 Sierra Linda Ct
$ 406.78
1077151040000
MEDINA, LUPE
10905 Spyglass Dr
$ 196.26
1077151880000
ZHENG, YAN LIVING TRUST (2019)
10783 Sundance Dr
$ 334.41
1077162030000
LDC VILLA CAPRI LLC
7408 Butterfield PI
$ 362.04
1077162120000
ILDC VILLA CAPRI LLC
17454 Butterfield PI
1 $ 472.56
1077162420000
ISHEONARINE, HARRY & BIBI REV TR 10-2
111008 Franklin Dr
1 $ 585.90
Page 118
Exhibit 'A'
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
BURRTEC WASTE INDUSTRIES
DELINQUENT SOLID WASTE ACCOUNTS
1077162450000
LDC VILLA CAPRI LLC
7401 Butterfield PI
$ 182.04
1077162480000
LDC VILLA CAPRI LLC
7419 Butterfield PI
$ 472.56
1077181260000
YECHENG BROOKSIDE LLC
7520 Brookside Rd
$ 196.26
1077181430000
LIPSCOMB, KEVIN T
7529 Plymouth Way
$ 472.56
1077251090000
GOULD, CHARLES
10468 Nutmeg St
$ 338.92
1077251200000
GUSHUE, BRUCE AND JANET REV TRUST
10487 Mangrove St
$ 272.56
1077251430000
CASE, TIMOTHY R
10441 Balsa St
$ 187.52
1077251530000
SARGENT, EFREM
10450 Balsa St
$ 564.96
1077261030000
TRAUTWEIN, DAVID
7673 Cartilla Ave
$ 540.14
1077281200000
WALLS, FRANK G
7522 Lockhaven Ave
$ 250.56
1077291090000
HARRIS, MURELL & LOURDES TRUST 8-4-0
7595 Teak Way
$ 292.56
1077291190000
SIENKNECHT, WALTER F
7506 Teak Way
$ 472.56
1077311070000
ELYAZAL, JAMAL
7570 Ramona Ave
$ 340.31
1077321030000
9762 CHURCH ST LLC
9762 Church St
$ 202.52
1077351540000
NICKELL, ROBERT RYAN
7816 Perlite Ct
$ 196.26
1077351690000
MENSEN, MARK D
10090 Effen St
$ 296.26
1077361020000
PEREZ, CHRISTOPHER A
9919 Hemlock St
$ 273.72
1077361230000
BUSICO, YANHOO
10052 Hemlock St
$ 196.26
1077361340000
POLANCO, DANIEL
9957 Langston St
$ 612.72
1077371340000
BRADLEY, JULIE K
7760 Kinlock Ave
$ 306.78
1077371740000
STUMP, GAIL K
10223 Hemlock St
$ 236.19
1077381030000
KILGORE, MICHAEL R
10266 Ashford St
$ 306.78
1077381180000
MARTINEZ, ARTHUR FAMILY TRUST4-26-0
10139 Ashford St
$ 472.56
1077381430000
DEHESA, CALVIN J JR
10156 Norwick St
$ 228.84
1077381440000
AGUILAR, JUAN
10146 Norwick St
$ 196.26
1077381460000
VIGNEAULT, DAVID J
10124 Norwick St
$ 472.56
1077381730000
ZUCKERMAN, JONATHAN
10194 Effen St
$ 352.45
1077391740000
HUIPE, DOMINGO R
10219 Stafford St
$ 222.56
1077422770000
MALCAI INTERSTATE PROPERTIES L
10950 Foothill Blvd
$ 534.29
1077423120000
TERRA VISTA TOWN CENTER LLC
10701 Town Center Dr
$ 319.11
1077611810000
DURADE, J
10076 Dorset Ct
$ 196.26
1077621340000
SHOOK PROPERTIES INC
9950 Foothill Blvd
$ 338.55
1077641160000
WAGGENER, DONNA SUE
8003 London Ave
$ 306.78
1077672080000
KELOSKY, DONIELLE L
7313 Belpine PI #8
$ 193.88
1077672220000
SHU, YU HANG
7337 Belpine PI #22
$ 299.64
1077673270000
HUNT, DAVID P
11232 Terra Vista Pkwy #88
$ 326.10
1077673410000
BENTLEY, KATHLEEN C
11204 Terra Vista Pkwy #101
$ 299.64
1077673440000
Lopez, Gina
11192 Terra Vista Pkwy #104
$ 458.28
1077721080000
RAFFARIN, LINDA
10994 Countryview Dr
$ 306.78
1077731300000
RAMIREZ, VICTOR
7746 Cardiff PI
$ 240.58
1077741450000
WILLS, TASHA
7646 Sandpiper Ct
$ 372.56
1077751030000
LDC VILLA CAPRI LLC
7684 Broadmoor PI
$ 282.32
1077751430000
MUNIVE, BLANCA
7662 Barrington Ct
$ 389.67
1077751730000
LDC VILLA CAPRI LLC
7687 Broadmoor PI
$ 236.69
1077761190000
MC CUNE, RUSSELLA
7609 Belpine PI
$ 472.56
1077762080000
ACOSTA, DARLENE A
11147 Alencon Dr
$ 564.96
1077762450000
LAI, SHEUNG K
11197 Alencon Dr
$ 261.74
1077762490000
YEH, ERIC
11210 Alencon Dr
$ 362.04
1077762730000
ILIVOLSI, LEONARD
111221 Alencon Dr
$ 191.52
1077822200000
ITANG, YUN
111209 Amiata Dr
$ 306.78
Page 119
Exhibit 'A'
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
BURRTEC WASTE INDUSTRIES
DELINQUENT SOLID WASTE ACCOUNTS
1077822250000
CHOWDHURY & BORA FAMIILY TR 10
11249 Amiata Dr
$ 334.41
1077831250000
HUAMAN, IVAN
11171 Saint Tropez Dr
$ 306.78
1077832460000
LI, QIANRU
11090 Mountain View Dr #42
$ 205.17
1077832490000
WANG, HE
11090 Mountain View Dr #45
$ 472.56
1077862200000
ZHANG, XIANG
7744 Ashbury Ct
$ 472.56
1077862350000
ESPINOZA, LAURA
7726 Abbot Ct
$ 251.52
1077881300000
Patel Family Trust
10375 Church St #83
$ 458.28
1087091230000
ZHAN, ZHONG CHENG
12340 Macon Dr
$ 252.14
1087091240000
JANG, ZHENSHI REVOCABLE TRUST 4/201
12336 Macon Dr
$ 250.63
1087101320000
LI, YONGZHI
5139 Magenta Ct
$ 472.56
1087101390000
ALMEIDA, ANDRE DA SILVA
5099 Sepia Ct
$ 251.52
1087111110000
ZHAO, JIA
12223 Scarlet Way
$ 322.93
1087111400000
CFK TRUST 9/27/01
12242 Scarlet Way
$ 362.04
1087121040000
ZHANG, QING
12461 Melon Dr
$ 472.56
1087121100000
LIU, JUN
5195 Cooper Ct
$ 409.28
1087131110000
TANG, SHUNZHONG
12409 Overland Dr
$ 472.56
1087131410000
PEREIRA, LEONOR
5271 Melon Ct
$ 244.15
1087141020000
PANG, SHIBO
12608 Dupont Dr
$ 196.26
1087151150000
PEARSON, MICHAEL STEPHEN
12518 Overland Dr
$ 242.78
1087151180000
NANDYALA, VINUTA D
12488 Overland Dr
$ 196.26
1087161080000
BRADSHAW, LAUREN
5188 Salton Ct
$ 428.71
1087201130000
KANG, HUI
5032 Woodley Ridge Dr
$ 472.56
1087201190000
US BLACK HAWK GROUP LLC
4988 Woodley Ridge Dr
$ 255.23
1087241110000
LIU, XINHAI
5540 Stoneview Rd
$ 196.26
1087281140000
DLUGOS, DONALD T
12852 N Rim Way
$ 222.56
1087281310000
GYLFIE, RICHARD J
5516 Sagebrush Ct
$ 502.16
1087301240000
HERRING, EDNA LIVING TRUST 4/4/19
12468 Altura Dr
$ 196.26
1087311310000
NIE, DONGMEI
12474 Tejas Ct
$ 203.39
1087331320000
SIDHU, BALRAJ BILL
5653 W Overlook Dr
$ 306.78
1087341440000
WRIGHT, TRACY A
5559 Carmello Ct
$ 472.56
1087351430000
YE, WEI
12597 Naples Way
$ 472.56
1087381120000
QIAO, ALVIN
5380 Stoneview Rd
$ 251.52
1087391170000
SINGH, SUKHDEV
12211 Alamo Dr
$ 306.78
1087391320000
NICHOLS, STEPHEN P
12280 Alamo Dr
$ 205.00
1087401250000
ZHANG,YU
12161 Casper Ct
$ 472.56
1089051190000
WINCHESTER, MICHAEL
7001 Fontaine PI
$ 472.56
1089051260000
SAMI, ABDUL
6947 Fontaine PI
$ 306.78
1089061290000
MA, JING
6775 Palo Verde PI
$ 472.56
1089061300000
AGUILAR, GERARDO H
6783 Palo Verde PI
$ 472.56
1089071100000
YOUNG FAMILY TRUST 2/2/04
7068 Spencer Ct
$ 472.56
1089081230000
LOU, WENXIA
12821 Victoria St
$ 306.78
1089091240000
LARA, DENA
12172 Stratford Dr
$ 564.96
1089091250000
CHOO, LETICIA
12164 Stratford Dr
$ 362.04
1089091450000
SAFI, RAED
6864 Birmingham PI
$ 472.56
1089091640000
ROSS, JAMES S II
12165 Highgate Dr
$ 472.56
1089092110000
PETERSEN, CHERYL A
6789 Birmingham PI
$ 204.22
1089092560000
MAYFIELD, LARRY E
12208 Stratford Dr
$ 564.96
1089101450000
GARIBAY, MARIA FELIPE
12208 Silverberry St
$ 282.32
1089121040000
WILLIAMS, EDITH M
16565 Palo Verde PI
1 $ 412.56
1089141040000
IYANG, JINYUAN
16643 Fairwinds Ct
1 $ 416.41
Page120
Exhibit 'A'
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
BURRTEC WASTE INDUSTRIES
DELINQUENT SOLID WASTE ACCOUNTS
1089141370000
QIN, GUANGFENG
6750 Summerstone Ct
$ 260.43
1089151170000
NG-NEWMAN, STEVEN J
11472 Fallingstar Ct
$ 221.14
1089151350000
LUGO, KATHY A
6611 Autumn Glen Ct
$ 451.68
1089172020000
CHI, XIAOXIA
11523 Grimaldi Rd
$ 417.30
1089191280000
PANG, XUAN
6774 Landriano PI
$ 472.56
1089191330000
HORNE, ROBBY C
6795 Landriano PI
$ 464.96
1089193130000
HUANG, ZHEN DA
6670 Meadowlane PI
$ 250.60
1089201070000
PI, KEVIN
6732 Florence PI
$ 472.56
1089201320000
WANG, JIANLI
11646 Pavia Dr
$ 359.37
1089201600000
WANG, FUXIU
11675 Pescara Rd
$ 403.93
1089211280000
LEWIS, RHONDA
11683 Portofino Dr
$ 564.96
1089232390000
LOCKHART, JOHNATHAN
6552 Vianza PI
$ 196.52
1089242300000
THOMPSON, MEREDITH MITCHELL
6632 Vianza PI
$ 317.30
1089251200000
JIAO, JIE
11356 Verona Dr
$ 515.12
1089251280000
YANG, CHRISTINE TIAN
6856 Padova Ct
$ 398.58
1089252020000
FRANCIS, MARILYN REVOCABLE LIVING TR
11381 Genova Rd
$ 252.06
1089252150000
ANNABI, DANIEL M
11344 Genova Rd
$ 214.91
1089272060000
ECHEVARRIA, MIGUELA
11441 Lugano Dr
$ 496.17
1089272110000
LI, XIAO FENG
11391 Lugano Dr
$ 472.56
1089272180000
PURDY, KEVIN M
7059 Novara PI
$ 376.86
1089282100000
LI, GANG
11725 Rapallo Dr
$ 472.56
1089301380000
ROMNEY, STACEY LIVING TRUST 6/15/15
6960 Belluno PI
$ 510.31
1089301460000
LU, ALBERT
6959 Belluno PI
$ 191.56
1089311310000
LUCAS, RANDY S
11788 Forli Dr
$ 564.96
1089312220000
SANTOS, MAN UELA FAMILY TRUST 7-9-04
7050 Marino PI
$ 196.26
1089312470000
AUSTIN, BEVERLY
7089 Pozallo PI
$ 211.41
1089312480000
SHEN FAMILY TRUST
7099 Pozallo PI
$ 233.10
1089321060000
HUANG, XIN
6940 Londonderry Ct
$ 280.04
1089321200000
TROTTER, JEREMY
6950 Londonderry Ct
$ 472.56
1089321240000
LIU, GUIKUAN
11926 Hunnicutt Dr
$ 361.42
1089331120000
KURTZ, SEAN
11978 Stegmeir Dr
$ 251.52
1089331130000
AU, DANNY SHUMAN
11984 Stegmeir Dr
$ 417.30
1089342210000
LIN, NELSON CHIN TIEN
7126 Turning Leaf PI
$ 362.04
1089351510000
THACH, MUNG
7132 Breno PI
$ 182.04
1089361430000
CHAN, KEVIN CHEN LU
11379 Williams Ridge Dr
$ 250.48
1089362170000
CHEN, LIANGYAN
7211 Venosa PI
$ 472.56
1089371050000
ABRAHAM HAN 2008 LLC
7242 Lesina PI
$ 206.78
1089371110000
GUIRGUIS, HANYT
7251 Altari PI
$ 458.64
1089372010000
KAKAR, FAHIM R
11591 Amelia Dr
$ 472.56
1089386040000
ARANGUIZ, MARIO
7146 Trivento PI
$ 306.78
1089391180000
METTILLE-SCHENK, DESIREE A TRUST
7269 Fermo PI
$ 184.67
1089392030000
GUPTA, DEBASISH
7217 Trivento PI
$ 362.04
1089392220000
QURESHI, ABDUL RASHEED
11791 Larino Dr
$ 472.56
1089392500000
OSIFESO, SOTUNDE OLUMIDE
11832 Letini Dr
$ 182.06
1089401540000
MOORE, SERRANN E TRUST
6569 Hazelnut Way
$ 219.08
1089431150000
CUBIAS, DORIS
6838 Carob Ave
$ 384.14
1089431210000
MURRAY, BUFFY
12268 Bellflower Ct
$ 472.56
1089441070000
MARIN, DERRICK A
12437 Silk Oak Ct
$ 472.56
1089441480000
IYEUNG, BENSON L
112543 Morning Glory Dr
$ 250.68
1089452490000
ICAUDILLO 2002 FAMILY TRUST (01
112538 Nasturtium Dr
$ 252.06
Page 121
Exhibit 'A'
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
BURRTEC WASTE INDUSTRIES
DELINQUENT SOLID WASTE ACCOUNTS
1089461020000
VANDERWALL, CHERYL
12487 Tamarisk Dr
$ 306.78
1089461070000
FLORES, MACARIO 0
12470 Bougainvillea Way
$ 362.04
1089471060000
BLACK, DOUGLAS
12468 Tulip Ct
$ 196.26
1089481310000
WEI, SHAORONG
12778 Carissa Ct
$ 388.75
1089481350000
MAGSINO, KRISTELJ
12814 Carissa Ct
$ 472.56
1089481490000
DURAN, MARTIN
6571 Arabis PI
$ 472.56
1089481610000
SPEARS, RICHARD L
6564 Etiwanda Ave
$ 285.36
1089491170000
BEACH, BRIAN ANTHONY
6648 Santolina PI
$ 196.26
1089521010000
MIZER, ETHAN
12406 Columbine Way
$ 218.38
1089531300000
PEREZ, MARITZA C
12301 Sugar Gum St
$ 195.02
1089531380000
MONTOYA, GILBERT
7094 Geranium PI
$ 472.56
1089531510000
CHAVARRIA, BRITTNEE L
7083 Crocus Ct
$ 186.17
1089531520000
CITIMORTGAGE, INC
7093 Crocus Ct
$ 298.76
1089531740000
LIAO, YITSUN CLIFF
7056 Jasmine Ct
$ 472.56
1089532140000
ROBERTSON REV TR 10/01
12387 Blazing Star Ct
$ 472.56
1089551040000
GONZALEZ, ANGELA 1
12608 Aster Ct
$ 246.78
1089551110000
DAVIS, BOBBIE JEAN
12575 Aster Ct
$ 472.56
1089551480000
BANG, SAYYIDA N
6931 Tipu PI
$ 306.78
1089551810000
SEDILLO, DONALD L
12473 Veronica Ct
$ 211.66
1089572150000
GUO, SHENYUAN
7112 Walcott PI
$ 211.66
1089581250000
KELLUM, JAIME
7248 Nobling Ct #11
$ 219.36
1089592640000
CASILLAS, ADRIAN
7154 Powell PI
$ 196.26
1089601230000
ROGERS, ALLEN
7224 Travis PI
$ 472.56
1089601560000
BELLO, LAURA D
12749 Nicolet Ct
$ 214.09
1089601570000
MC COY, LEALON
12757 Nicolet Ct
$ 564.96
1089611150000
LEE, LIZA
11959 Huntley Dr
$ 282.72
1089611390000
HUANG, XUEYING
7218 Westhaven PI
$ 472.56
1089611740000
ZHOU, MIN
7201 Cumberland PI
$ 251.52
1089621090000
ROJAS, JULIO
12181 Eton Dr
$ 583.56
1089621120000
TOY, MICHAEL 0
12182 Avon Ct
$ 272.56
1089621270000
GUARRACINO, JERRY
12211 Avon Ct
$ 487.57
1089631150000
PEREZ, MARIO
12192 Saxon Dr
$ 307.67
1089631200000
DHILLON, BRINDERJIT
12167 Saxon Dr
$ 514.96
1089641510000
GOMEZ, ALFRED
7204 San Carmela Ct
$ 472.56
1089651060000
FELLHAUER, ROBERT J REVOCABLE TR 10/
11920 Sagemont Dr
$ 306.78
1089651180000
UNGER, VALERIE
7129 Westhaven PI
$ 361.42
1089651210000
MADRID, TRINIDAD A JR
7153 Westhaven PI
$ 306.78
1089651330000
LI, YING
7153 Cumberland PI
$ 196.52
1090021520000
DAULATZAI, JAM ILA
7353 W Ellena #160
$ 193.88
1090021590000
SCOLLON, JAMES 0
7353 W Ellena #173
$ 405.40
1090022540000
LEE, MICHAEL
7353 W Ellena #168
$ 299.64
1090031040000
ROBERTS, MARION
11501 Stonecrest Dr
$ 472.56
1090031320000
TRESIDDER, SARAH ABDELMESIH
7307 Stonehaven PI
$ 222.30
1090041030000
TAN, YI
7481 Hollaway Rd
$ 282.32
1090041370000
SHI, WEI
11530 Lancaster Way
$ 472.56
1090061070000
GALVAN, KAREN ABIGAIL
11326 Downing Ct
$ 327.04
1090061270000
PATTERSON, DIANE M
11331 Regent Dr
$ 472.56
1090061290000
QIU, HAILONG
11345 Regent Dr
$ 329.95
1090071240000
GONZALEZ, MARTIN
111497 Southampton Ct
$ 417.30
1090081030000
IMAGNUM PROPERTY INVESTMENTS ILL
17370 Legacy PI
1 $ 251.52
Page122
Exhibit 'A'
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
BURRTEC WASTE INDUSTRIES
DELINQUENT SOLID WASTE ACCOUNTS
1090081170000
BENTLEY, JOHN C
11722 Celebration Dr
$ 196.26
1090091110000
ANDRADE, LILIA L
7358 Oxford PI
$ 564.96
1090101330000
SAIZA, NANCY GONZALES
7411 Ethan Ct
$ 422.56
1090102610000
WANG, LING
7425 Hutchinson PI
$ 272.40
1090111430000
MARTIN, RYAN
7423 Tyler PI
$ 196.26
1090132050000
AHMED, LUBNA S
11846 Manhattan Ct
$ 272.56
1090132320000
PARK, HONG SOO
11873 Bunker Dr
$ 264.89
1090142390000
CHEN, MINQI
7634 Continental PI
$ 196.26
1090142470000
ALLEN, LAYA
11861 Proclamation Dr
$ 302.34
1090151310000
CHARLES, ANGELA A
11555 Barrett Dr
$ 404.72
1090151340000
ZHANG, ZHICHENG
11533 Barrett Dr
$ 511.57
1090152020000
WANG, MINGXIN
7569 Hardy Ave
$ 521.33
1090161360000
KELLER REVOCABLE TRUST (7-19-9
11433 Mountain View Dr #38
$ 372.56
1090191370000
GIVENS, PEGGY A
11450 Church St #74
$ 458.28
1090191460000
STUBBLEFIELD, BRANDON
11450 Church St #83
$ 299.64
1090193330000
ADDY, KRISTA ANN
11450 Church St #141
$ 352.07
1090222520000
RUIZ, VANESSA
11799 Rockingham Ct
$ 417.30
1090231470000
SMALEY, MARIZE
11831 Potomac Ct
$ 472.56
1090251080000
LEWIS, TERRY L
7320 Henbane St
$ 472.56
1090251260000
PUENTE, GREGORY P
7318 Fennel Rd
$ 196.26
1090251310000
WANG, QINGLONG
7339 Fennel Rd
$ 472.56
1090251390000
CASAZZA, BURT R
7370 Hyssop Dr
$ 207.45
1090251400000
THILL, NATHANIEL
7360 Hyssop Dr
$ 205.01
1090251420000
MONTOYA, PRIMITIVO
7340 Hyssop Dr
$ 272.56
1090261100000
BUGARIN, MARTIN
7464 Henbane St
$ 251.52
1090261560000
WIERSMA, JEANETTE D
7412 Hyssop Dr
$ 196.26
1090271110000
LUO, MENG
11954 Fennel Ct
$ 372.56
1090291080000
BARNICK, JOHN P
11994 Ashford St
$ 251.52
1090291130000
IBARRA, YVETTE VANESSA
12037 Hemlock St
$ 306.78
1090291200000
NIETO, ANA M
11949 Hemlock St
$ 282.68
1090291240000
LI, WEN BIN
7776 Henbane St
$ 614.92
1090291300000
REYES, STEVEN
7712 Henbane St
$ 386.16
1090291380000
THOMAS, JAMES G
7770 Fennel Rd
$ 265.04
1090301390000
UNGA, CHRISTOPHER M
11960 Norwick St
$ 564.96
1090301490000
BOWLES ENTERPRISES INC
12015 Ashford St
$ 306.78
1090311030000
PLOSCARIU, DANIEL
12005 Stafford St
$ 472.56
1090311380000
VILLARREAL, LUIS M
11934 Dorset St
$ 417.30
1090321210000
PEREZ, RICHEL R
8015 Henbane St
$ 196.26
1090321220000
FONUA, HOKENI S
8016 Henbane St
$ 432.04
1090341040000
DONG, LING
12356 Meritage Ct
$ 306.78
1090341320000
WEI, QIANG
12405 Royal Oaks Dr
$ 200.50
1090341570000
XU, SHENBO
7400 Estancia Ct
$ 343.32
1090351120000
SANCHEZ, MICHAEL
7420 Arbor Ln
$ 196.26
1090351260000
SUN, YI
12563 Vintner Dr
$ 196.26
1090351480000
JONES, DAVID C SEP PROP TR
12572 Vintner Dr
$ 359.37
1090361040000
NGU, TAN QUOC
7318 Reserve PI
$ 564.96
1090381030000
MONCAYO, JESSE
12868 Elegance Dr
$ 564.96
1090381630000
NI, HAIYANG
12793 Mosaic Dr
$ 251.52
1090401050000
IYU, JING
112850 Golden Leaf Dr
$ 255.53
1090401170000
IMATTHEWS, MICHAEL
112732 Golden Leaf Dr
$ 248.50
Page123
Exhibit 'A'
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
BURRTEC WASTE INDUSTRIES
DELINQUENT SOLID WASTE ACCOUNTS
1090401410000
KHAN, ARIF
12742 Wine Cellar Ct
$ 251.52
1090431210000
CHEN, LEI
7531 Oakford Ct
$ 306.78
1090441270000
YAO, PARIA
12433 Wilson Creek Dr
$ 246.81
1090451110000
OCAMPO, CARLOS G
7549 Silverado Trail PI
$ 267.80
1090451120000
WANG, KIKI YUAN
7555 Silverado Trail PI
$ 251.52
1090451140000
SALAIS, ROSE E
7575 Silverado Trail PI
$ 314.96
1090451400000
A & T GLOBAL INVESTMENT (EASTV
12353 Alderbrook Dr
$ 349.56
1090461360000
FAN, DANTAO
12222 Dry Creek Dr
$ 306.78
1090461490000
MIHALKOVITZ, ALEX E
12260 Waterbrook Dr
$ 262.22
1090461520000
LIANG, QI WEI
12236 Waterbrook Dr
$ 196.26
1090461590000
WANG, YI
12205 Bridlewood Dr
$ 472.56
1090471080000
LIU, QIAN
7639 Pine Ridge PI
$ 306.78
1090481060000
ELLIOTT, MEAGAN K
12252 Chantrelle Dr #3
$ 458.28
1090481270000
Critchlow, Tye L
7693 Hess PI #1
$ 458.28
1090482480000
ZHANG, PU
7732 Hess PI #3
$ 299.64
1090482510000
PRICE, DREW
7733 Hess PI #3
$ 198.28
1090483010000
XIAO, ZHIGANG
12227 N Mainstreet #3
$ 251.52
1090483040000
LAU, PAUL H & LIU, XI QTRUST 2/2
12215 N Mainstreet #3
$ 193.88
1090483330000
AUBERT, MARLO R
12179 N Mainstreet #1
$ 299.64
1090483360000
KHADEMI, GHOLAM H LIVING TR 9/25/00
7752 Chambray PI #1
$ 306.78
1090491260000
WEN, EVA
7693 Bombay PI #6
$ 193.88
1090491270000
ZHANG, CHARLENE XIAOLING
12426 Canal Dr #1
$ 334.61
1090491280000
VEGA, SILVIA
12426 Canal Dr #2
$ 320.96
1090492420000
YANEZ, ALEX
12487 Canal Dr #1
$ 299.64
1090492430000
WILLMONT LLC
12487 Canal Dr #2
$ 247.08
1090492490000
ARZATE, MICHELLE
7691 Creole PI #3
$ 458.28
1090492610000
DE LEON, REGNAR
12465 Benton Dr #1
$ 299.64
1090493080000
WILLMONT LLC
12336 Hollyhock Dr #2
$ 405.40
1090493130000
DAI, SHERRIE
12347 Hollyhock Dr #3
$ 354.28
1090494090000
WILLMONT LLC
7693 Chalet PI #1
$ 458.28
1090494490000
LIU, MICHAEL W
7694 Lisbon PI #3
$ 193.88
1090494580000
RODAS, MARY PATRICIA
12371 Claredon Dr #6
$ 283.43
1090501690000
LUO, YANRU
7604 Duck Creek PI
$ 417.30
1090511270000
BIEDERMANN, KYLE
12780 Spring Mountain Dr
$ 185.97
1090512100000
QIU, XINQI
12810 Wild Horse Way
$ 472.56
1090692050000
ZHAO, CHENGJUAN
12230 Chorus Dr
$ 189.81
1100011360000
WANG, JIEYU
12963 Riley Ct
$ 472.56
1100011430000
RODRIGUEZ, EDITH
12962 Colonial Dr
$ 231.70
1100011440000
WANG FAMILY REVOCABLE TRUST 02
12952 Colonial Dr
$ 352.98
1100011510000
SUN, JING TRUST 2019
12949 Colonial Dr
$ 443.66
1100011530000
GONZALES, YOODIY
12971 Colonial Dr
$ 472.56
1100011870000
Shi, Weixin
7331 Shelby PI #15
$ 267.23
1100021010000
ACEVEDO, ADRIANA
7491 Etiwanda Ave
$ 337.28
1100021210000
MENDOZA, VICTOR M
12995 Quail Ct
$ 272.56
1100021240000
GROUP III SGV PROPERTIES LTD
13033 Quail Ct
$ 196.26
1100021370000
LY, JONATHAN P
12975 Bartholow Dr
$ 352.98
1100021630000
AGUILAR, ALEJANDRO A
7498 Bungalow Way
$ 211.66
1100041010000
MARC HOMES LLC
7611 Etiwanda Ave
$ 253.36
1100041290000
LAGUNA, RUBEN J
113029 Loire Valley Dr
$ 472.56
1100041410000
IMCHENRY, THEADORE R
113061 Malvasia Way
$ 382.32
Page124
Exhibit 'A'
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
BURRTEC WASTE INDUSTRIES
DELINQUENT SOLID WASTE ACCOUNTS
1100041470000
KAMALABADI, IRAJ
13046 Loire Valley Dr
$ 196.26
1100051570000
YU, BIN
7331 Shelby PI #96
$ 458.28
1100052250000
PIEROTH, PAUL R
7331 Shelby PI #31
$ 458.28
1100052340000
QIU, MICHELLE J
7331 Shelby PI #40
$ 245.40
1100061280000
GONZALES, VICKI
13232 Woodchase Ct
$ 196.26
1100061480000
GOMEZ, SALVADOR
7446 Bungalow Way
$ 272.56
1100071120000
JAYAWARDENA, SISIRA LUXMAN
7522 Morning Crest PI
$ 306.78
1100071380000
MICHELLE Z LLC
7559 Vista Montana PI
$ 583.56
1100081240000
TAFOYA, JOSE A L
7620 Tuscany PI
$ 272.56
1100082190000
RODGERS, RICHARD A
13236 Palmira Dr
$ 258.67
1100082210000
ARMENDAREZ, ELENA
13256 Palmira Dr
$ 326.72
1100082500000
WU, ZIYU
7689 Morning Crest PI
$ 564.96
1100131430000
WANG, ZHUIZHOU
12936 Canopy Ct
$ 445.22
1100141250000
RAMIREZ FAMILY TRUST02/25/19
7854 Margaux PI
$ 306.78
1100141480000
YANG, HONG
7873 Chablis PI
$ 472.56
1100161010000
ZHANG, YIJIAN
8011 Etiwanda Ave
$ 206.78
1100162130000
TRIVEDI, BANSARI J
8090 Cornwall Ct #70
$ 458.28
1100171030000
WANG, CHENGMIN
13213 Miller Ave
$ 464.96
Total Parcels: 1,016
$ 387,677.08
Page 125
Public Hearing for Placement of Special
Assessments and Liens for Delinquent
Solid Waste Accounts
May 19, 2021
Mandatory Payment Program
Section 8.17.170 of the Rancho Cucamonga
Municipal Code established the requirements for
mandatory payment for residential, commercial
and industrial solid waste collection services.
• The franchised waste hauler provides the City
with a list of delinquent accounts annually.
• City is required to send out public hearing
notices via certified mail at least 10 days prior
to the public hearing.
Public Hearing Notification
• The Public Hearing notices were mailed to all
property owners on the list of delinquent accounts
on April 22, 2021.
• The Public Hearing was also advertised in the
Inland Valley Daily Bulletin on May 4, 2021.
Delinquent Accounts as of May 18, 2021
• Accrual period: January 1, 2020- December 31, 2020
• 1,016 Delinquent Accounts
• Total Delinquent Amount $387,677.08
• Deadline for Franchise Waste
July 129 2021
Hauler to receive
Public Hearing Notice Inquiries as of
May 18, 2021
• 32 Inquiries
• 60 total visits to the Lien Public Hearing info page
posted on City's website
• Two written protests
Questions?
05/19/2021 - CITY COUNCIL MEETING - ITEM G1 - ADDITIONAL CORRESPONDENCE
Delinquent Solid Waste Protests
May 19, 2021
Date
Name
Address
Reason for Protest
Commercial/Residential Account?
4/28/2021
Deanne Cantu
10950 Foothill Blvd
Delinquent amount is for previous tenant.
Commercial
5/18/2021
Todd Launchbau h
10759 Civic Center Drive
The debt is between the previous tenant and Burrtec,
tenants' bankruptcy should account for this debt.
Commercial
5/19/2021
Sergio Rodriguez
8241 White Oak Avenue
Failed to provide services, and bill has been paid.
Commercial
«
N
S
u
[y v h
�aao
m
C.�
W O
� v o
qE E
j m 8 s V
umP Qw
m cm"J
E m v m
W
W
= M
OVVCU
n am
'�(UwEo
$gsz�g
�dmaw
-$a o
matc
oil
c
T G p, E C 9
Ho O
..yfp Yze
'
O m
]
N, OR o.
gm$wto3
q�m�Op
a
m
V 8 0li
W
O
NO°
m'
V WE
r�V�w
m U C � ryw
L DN�J,N
O
mava?
�S�nc
=om`
C V � qpp m
Q J�mV
=aag E>m
V m q L
10
cEn�o
E+qv
Em�mQ
8cg�v
$ M gE�
�Sm„m
Emwgffi
> = C m J
L E py° C
°�i Naw
`0$a()
d
A cg
m ¢ "°! ; C
a tt� E3�
W yS
QQ "c WP`Lg'C3�W�'
m
LL
W uCJ C 'N EC i y uj
=a-.0 Ql. ^mDgaV
q`0a�xBE�m
1.8mta-A
E,Ygwg�
awa
U�
V V
11
746
|
..
k
�k
A
$/
■
f!
!
-
�»
tu
u
-
_
,
«
-
-- m
12
f!!
|f
#(k
§!
\)CL
§/!),
Cam
/
d\\�
�!!
!IE.
!
-�/§7
jo
_\
!#/
.�!
!l�Iw
k
I
able to ask for more than 60 days worth of billings based on the city's agreement with Burrtec that they
notify the owner after 60 days
I strongly oppose the attempt by the city of Rancho Cucamonga to make one person responsible for
someone else`s debts. Candidly, this should be an embarrassement to the elected officials that the city
has entered into an agreement with a vendor that basically guarantees payment by making it the
responsibility of some one who is not a party to the agreement. This is about a close to "taxation
without Representation" as you can get.
Thank you your assistance
Todd Launch buagh
Todd Launchbaugh
Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this electronic e-mail and any accompanying attachmeotisj is intended only for the use of the
intended recipient and may he confidential. if any reader of this communication is not the intended recipient, unauthorized use, disclosure or copying is
strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by return a -mail, and
delete the original message and all copies fromyour system, Thank you.
2
Burrtec Waste Industries, Inc. Mac Bee Engineering Corp
Fontana Division
10769 Civic Center Dr
9820 Cherry Ave
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91720
Fontana. CA 92335
909-822-9739
Total Previous Balance
Current Charges
For Service at: 10759 Civic Center Dr
O5/01121 1
Trash Service
05/01121 1
Lock
Customer Number
Invoice Number
on
Statement Date 05/01/21
Service Period May 2021
197.51
12.33
1678.72
Total Amount Due - - DO NOT PAY 1888.56
You am enrolled in Auto Pay. Payment will be deducted from your account on the 10th of the month.
PAST DUE! Payment is due upon receipt. Thank you.
Customer Service Hours are Monday - Friday, 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM. For your convenience, you can pay this invoice
online by going to www.burrtec.com or simply dial (866) 306-8122 to use our automated service. Payments may also
be made in person at 9820 Cherry Ave, Fontana. For inquiries, call (909) 822-9739 or fax (909) 429.4291.
Burrtec Waste Industries, Inc.
Fontana Division
9820 Cherry Ave
Fontana, CA 92335
Mac Bee Engineering Corp
10759 Civic Center Or
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
www-buroec.com
...........................................................
on and return with payment.
Customer Number
Service Period
May 2021
Due By
DO NOT PAY
Total Due
1888.56
Enter Amount Paid: $ DO NOT PAY
Send payment to:
Buntac Waste Industries, Inc
P.O. Box 51366
Los Angeles, CA 90051-5666
001164-000-9 Paget oft04000001365657822000000119627387000209841
Holiday Schedule
As a reminder, we observe the following holidays:
New Year's Day 41h of July Thanksgiving Day
Memorial Day Labor Day Christmas Day
When the holiday falls on a weekday, collections for the remainder of the week will be delayed by one day.
There is no service interuption or delay when the holiday falls on a Saturday or Sunday.
Payment is ¢lase as indicated on the front of this invoice. Delinquent balances may be subject to a late fee.
YES! I want to sign up for Auto Pay!
Now you have the option of paying your bill without the hassle of mailing a check. You can sign up for our FREE "Auto Pay"
program and future bills will be paid through an automatic deduction from your checking account.
Three easy ways to sign up for Auto Pay, (1) visit our website, www.bun-tec.com and click on the "Online Bill Pay", follow
the directions to sign up, (2) complete the application below and mail to your local Customer Service Department shown on the
front of this invoice, or (3) call our Customer Service Department and request an application be mailed to you. You will continue
to receive a statement for the current balance due on your account. Once your Auto Pay authorization has been processed, your
statement will read: "Please do not pay. Your account will be debited on the 1 Oth day after the billing date."
The program will begin with your next bill. Please feel free to contact our Customer Service staff if you have further questions.
Authorization
I understand that by completing this form I am authorizing my bank to automatically deduct from my account the balance due on
my invoice. If I choose to cancel this agreement, I will provide no less than 30 days written notice. I authorize my bank to process
payments from my checking account in the amount shown due on my invoice. This authorization will remain in effect until
revoked in writing.
Name:
(Print Name)
Signature:
Date:
PLEASE ATTACH VOIDED CHECK
Temporary Containers for Special Cleanups
We offer 3-yard to 40-yard containers for cleanups and special projects.
Please refer to the front of this invoice for your local Customer Service
Department contact information, or visit our website at www.burrtec.corn.
11/16/2020
CM/ECF - U.S. Bankruptcy Court (v5.2.1 - LIVE)
United States Bankruptcy Court
Central District of California
Notice of Bankruptcy Case Filing
A bankruptcy case concerning the debtor(s) listed below was filed under
Chapter 7 of the United States Bankruptcy Code, entered on 11/16/2020 at
12:07 PM and filed on 11/16/2020.
Jonathan Michael Stevens
14561 Calgary Circle
Fontana, CA 92336
S SN / ITIN: xxx-xx�
aka Jonathan M Stevens
The case was filed by the debtor's attorney:
Neil R Hedtke
820 N Mountain Ave
Ste 109
Upland, CA 91786
909-579-2233
The case was assigned case numbe
FILED
11/16/2020
12:07 PM
ti A
"M-
;rs CI
In most instances, the filing of the bankruptcy case automatically stays certain collection and other actions against
the debtor and the debtor's property. Under certain circumstances, the stay may be limited to 30 days or not exist at
all, although the debtor can request the court to extend or impose a stay. If you attempt to collect a debt or take
other action in violation of the Bankruptcy Code, you may be penalized. Consult a lawyer to determine your rights
in this case.
If you would like to view the bankruptcy petition and other documents filed by the debtor, they are available at our
Internet home page www.cacb.uscourts.gov or at the Clerk's Office, 3420 Twelfth Street„ Riverside, CA 92501-
3819.
You may be a creditor of the debtor. If so, you will receive an additional notice from the court setting forth
important deadlines.
Kathleen J. Campbell
Clerk, U.S. Bankruptcy Court
PACER Service Center
Transaction Receipt
11/16/2020 12:09:36
PACER Logi Client Code:
Description: Notice of Fili ISearch Criteria:
Billable Pages:
1
Cost: I0.10
https:Hecf.cacb.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/NoticeOfFiling.pl?1913385 1/2
_ 'a L. p nis ichaef yor Poo Te. Lane B. Kennedy
JE Council Members Rvan .Hutchison. Kristine D. Scntf. Snm Sonrinnln
White Oak Commercial Llc
8241 White Oak Ave
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
0208355300000
City Manager John R. Gil lison
CITY OF O
10500 Civic Center Drive I Rancho Cvcvmonga, CA 91730 1 909.477.2700 I www.CityofRC.us
Protest 3
#TT A C H LD
Subject: Notice of Public Hearing — Placement of Special Assessment/Lien for Delinquent Solid Waste
Accounts
Dear Property Owner:
This letter is to officially inform you that your name is on a list assigned by the City of Rancho Cucamonga
for collection of a delinquent solid waste account(s). Pursuant to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal
Code Section 8.17.170 - Mandatory Payment for collection service -Exceptions, "...charges for solid waste
collection services furnished on behalf of the city by an authorized collector that remain delinquent for a
period of at least 60 days shall constitute a lien against the parcel of land for which the refuse collection
services were provided".
To have your name removed from the list and to avoid further penalties on delinquent charges, please
submit full payment to Burrtec Waste Industries prior to the Public Hearing date. Failure to clear your
account will cause the delinquent charges, plus an additional $141.00 administrative processing fee, to
become a special assessment (lien) against your property and payable with your property taxes. If your
delinquent charges are paid and you believe that you have received this letter in error, please contact
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
The City Council has scheduled a Public Hearing on Wednesday, May 19, 2021, at 7:00 p.m., or as
soon thereafter as if may be heard in the Council Chambers of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, located at
10500 Civic Center Drive. The City Council will hear all objections or protests of the property owners
listed during this public meeting. Property owners can file a written protest with the City Clerk's
office no later than 4:00 p.m., May 19, 2021, at the City Clerk's office, 10500 Civic Center Drive,
Rancho Cucamonga, 91730 or email them to City. Clerk ai 7cityofrc. us
Property owners wishing to speak during the public hearing on May 19, 2021, will need to dial in
to Q09) 774-2751 at that time, to be added to the queue for public comment. The Agenda will be posted
online at least 72 hoursn advance of the hearing at t7ttp ., w_ww; cttyotrc.us/. Due to GOVID-19, there will
be no members of the public at the Council meeting. In lace of in -person attendance, members of the
public are encouraged to watch from the safety of their homes in one of the following ways: 1. Live
Streaming on the City's website at: htt s:1/www.cit ofrc.usl our- overnrmenf/cif -council-a endas or 2.
Local Cable: RCTV3 Programming.
Burrtec Waste Industries directly for resolution at (909) 987-3717.
If you have any further questions regarding the Public Hearing, please contact the City of Rancho
Cucamonga at (909) 774-4025. Additional information is available online at https://www.cityofrc.us/your-
Qovernment/orooerty-liens.
Please note that you are not obligated to attend the Public Hearing if you have cleared your solid waste
account or do not intend to protest
White Oak Commercial. LLC
To the City of Rancho Cucamonga:
Response and Dispute To notice of Hearing — Placement of Special Assessment(Lien Delinquent
Solid Waste Accounts
Re 8241 White Oak Avenue
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Facts and Arguments:
1. The bill has been paid for the months of services provided.
2. On or about January of 2018 Burtec breach the agreement and failed to provide the services it
was obligated to perform. It failed to pick up the waste for over 3 months. [Exhibit 11
3. White Oak Commercial LLC (WOC) sent photographs of the growing trash in the bins to Burnet,
early in 2019. [Exhibit 11
4. The Dispute went to supervisor Alfonso Villapando at Burrtec in 2019. NEVER RESOLVED.
5. The Dispute also been discussed with Jose Gallon in 2021. NEVER RESOLVED.
6. Recently, AFTER RECEIVING THE NOTICE OF THIS HEARING, I talked to Mr. Guillen
again and he informed me he was going to follow upon the account and attempt to resolve. NO
FURTHER RESPONSE.
7. My staff contacted Burrtec again November 2020. No resolution either. [Exhibit 21
8. Today I spoke with Emily, Breanna, and Soraya at Burrtec. They could not handle the account
either and refused to connect me with the billing department.
9. Burrtec is either completely inept and negligent. or acting in bad faith, and has breached the
agreement with my office by failing to provide the series they bill for.
10. Burrtec also failed to pick up the trash today. The truck was here but didn't pick it up.
Today!!!! [Exhibit31
11. Burrtec driver has also dump items illegally at our bins. I had to chase him one time and demand
that he retrieve the construction equipment dumped in my bins.
Sergio Rodriguez
Managing member of White Oak Commercial LLC
EXHIBIT 1
r
Ir
EXHIBIT 2
SRG Billing
From: SRG Billing
Sent: Wednesday, November 04, 2020 2:52 PM
To: Kebrina Sanchez
Cc: Sergio Rodriguez
Subject: RE: Burrtec Waste Invoice for account #21136565878
Good Afternoon Kebrina,
My boss, Mr. Rodriguez and I have contacted your office several times regarding concerns we've had with your services.
To date, we have not received a call back from your Manager, Mr. Villapando to resolve such Issues.
Please contact Mr. Rodriguez at 909-466-1661 to resolve our concerns.
Thank you,
Sonia Pena
From: Kebrina Sanchez rmailto:ksanchezGDburrtec.coml
Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2020 10:07 AM
To: SRG Billing
Subject: Burrtec Waste Invoice for account #21136565878
Kebrina Sanebez
9:34 AM SRG LAW GROUP
05/19121 All Payments Issued for Rancho Disposal Services, Inc.
All Transactions
Type
Num
Date
Amount
Bill Pmt-Check
5037
4/20/2021
135.72
Bill Pint -Check
5002
31W021
135.72
Bill Pmt-Check
4986
2/1/2021
135.72
Bill Pint -Check
4967
1152021
135.72
Bill Pmt-Check
4952
12115=20
135.72
BIII Pmt-Check
4933
11/172020
135.72
Bill Pint -Check
4921
10/192020
135.72
Bill Pmt-Check
4911
10H2020
105.72
Bill Pint -Check
4905
9/162020
117.14
Bill Pmt-Check
4754
1/272020
135.72
BIII Pmt-Check
4738
11112020
117.14
BIII Pint Check
4693
11/182019
117.14
Bill Pmt Check
4674
10/122019
117.14
BIII Pmt Check
4644
9192019
234.28
Bill Pint Check
4616
W62019
234.28
Bill Pml-Check
4588
7292019
234.28
Bill Pmt-Check
4561
6292019
234.28
Bill Pml-Check
4525
5252019
117.14
Bill Pint -Check
1
12/182018
111.57
Bill Pint -Check
9066
10/52018
111.57
Bill Pmt-Check
9064
91192018
111.57
Bill Pint Check
9062
8WO18
111.57
Bill Pint -Check
9060
7/172018
111.57
BIII Pmt-Check
9058
6/182018
111.57
BIII Pmt-Check
9056
5222018
111.57
Bill Pmt Check
90M
4/172018
111.57
BIII Pmt Check
9052
3/152018
111.57
BIII Pmt Check
9049
21=018
111.57
BIII Pmt Check
9047
1115=18
111.57
Bill Pmt Check
9045
12115/2017
111.57
Bill Pint -Check
9043
11/15/2017
111.57
Bill Pmt-Check
9040
10/132017
111.57
Bill Prr4-Check
9037
9/152017
111.57
Check
9034
8212017
111.57
Bill Pmt-Check
3444
8/112017
117.14
Bill Pml-Check
3420
7/152017
5.57
Bill Pint -Check
9031
7/132017
111.57
Bill Pml-Check
9028
6/152017
111.57
Bill Prnt-Check
9022
524/2017
111.57
Bill Prnt-Check
3335
5/142017
111.57
Bill Pmt-Ghent
9023
4/5/2017
223.14
Bill Pmt-Check
3253
W712017
111.57
Bill Pml-Check
3235
1/192017
111.57
Bill Pint -Check
3199
12WO16
111.57
Bill Pint -Check
3167
11/152016
111.57
Bill Pint -Check
3146
10/182016
223.14
Bill Prnt-Check
3075
8/152016
111.57
Bill Pint -Check
3051
7/152016
111.57
Bill Pint -Check
3027
61142016
111.57
Bill Pint Check
2994
5/162016
111.57
Bill Pint Check
2971
41152016
111.57
BIII Pint -Check
2946
3/162016
111.57
Bill Pmt Check
2920
2/162016
111.57
Bill Pint -Check
2896
1/152016
111.57
Bill Pint -Check
2872
12/142015
111.57
Bill Pmt Check
2841
11/172015
111.57
Bill Pmt Check
2812
10/152015
111.57
BIII Pint -Check
2788
9/172015
111.57
Bill Pint Check
2759
8/172015
111.57
Bill Pmt-Check
2716
7/162015
111.57
Bill Pint -Check
2695
6/152015
111.57
Bill Pmt-Check
2669
5/1=015
111.57
Bill Pint -Check
2648
4/142015
111.57
Bill Pml-Check
2584
3/162015
111.57
BIII Pint -Check
2558
2117=15
111.57
BIII Part -Check
2523
1/12/2015
111.57
Bill Pint -Check
2504
12/172014
106.53
Page 1
9.34 AM SRG LAW GROUP
05119121 All Payments Issued for Rancho Disposal Services, Inc.
All Transactions
Typo
Num
Date
Amount
Bill Pmt Check
2478
11/42014
106.53
Bill Pmt-Check
2460
10202014
106.53
Bill Pmt-Check
2423
9/42014
106.53
Bill Pmt-Check
2400
8/142014
106.53
Bill P.t Check
2374
711 2014
106.53
Bill Pmt Check
2328
622014
191.75
Total 9,023.30
Page 2
EXHIBIT 3
�f
EXHIBIT 4
/
6;
� 2 �
I
DATE:
May 19, 2021
TO:
Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:
John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY:
Jana Cook, Community Improvement Manager
SUBJECT:
Public Hearing to Consider a Resolution Approving the List of Properties
with Nuisance Abatements and Authorizing the Placement of a Special
Assessment. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021-039) (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a Resolution approving the list of properties with
nuisance abatements, and authorize the placement of special assessment and liens against the
respective parcels of land to be collected for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at the same time
and in the same manner as ordinary County ad valorem property taxes.
BACKGROUND:
In the interest of public safety, the City will occasionally serve notice to a property owner to abate
nuisance conditions that are harmful to the public, including open structures, which can be an
attractive nuisance to children, a harbor for vagrants, or allow criminal activity. When the owner
does not comply, the City will have the work completed by an independent contractor as allowed
by Municipal and State law. The contractors are paid by the City, and the owner is billed for the
work. The funds are secured by filing a Notice of Pendency on the property, but there is no
penalty for owners that have not paid for the resulting benefit to the property. Municipal Code
Section 8.23.200 allows unpaid abatement costs to become assessments against the respective
parcels of land, resulting in liens on the property for the amount of the nuisance abatement, plus
administrative charges. A Public Hearing Notice is prepared by the City and mailed to the property
owners by First Class and Certified mail no less than ten (10) days prior to the Public Hearing
date.
ANALYSIS:
Property owners that have received the benefit of work performed on private property without
reimbursing the cost to the City can be considered to have received a loan of public funds at no
cost. Collecting these funds as a special assessment will allow the City to recover expended
funds in a timely and fiscally responsible manner. City Staff established a list of 25 properties
with unpaid balances for nuisance abatements and mailed a Notice of Public Hearing via First
Class and Certified mail to each property owner on April 19, 2021. As of May 10, 2021, staff
received inquiries on one (1) property determined to have been paid and removed from the
list. Exhibit "A" includes the 24 remaining properties with unpaid nuisance abatement fees for a
total of $81,930.83 to be assessed. Owners have until July 31, 2021 to submit payment to the
City to avoid submittal to the County. Properties remaining on the list after July 31, 2021 will be
submitted to the County for the 2021-22 tax roll.
Page 126
FISCAL IMPACT:
The current annual budget for nuisance abatement in Community Improvement is $40,000. The
prompt recovery of these costs after expenditure will allow for the continued funding of this budget
item without negative impacts.
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:
None Noted.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 — Resolution No. 2021-039
Page 2
Page 127
RESOLUTION NO. 2021-039
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING THE
REPORT OF UNPAID NUISANCE ABATEMENTS ON PRIVATE
PROPERTY, WHICH SHALL CONSTITUTE SPECIAL
ASSESSMENTS AND LIENS AGAINST THE RESPECTIVE
PARCELS OF LAND AND SHALL BE COLLECTED FOR THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA AT THE SAME
TIME AND IN THE SAME MANNER AS ORDINARY COUNTY AD
VALOREM PROPERTY TAXES
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 8.23.160 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal
Code, code enforcement staff did issue a Notice to Abate to the property owners of record which
included the violation existing at the property and the required correction with a due date at least
ten days after the service, and such notice was served by Certified Mail; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to Sections 8.23.170 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal
Code, the code enforcement officer found the violation remained at the property after the due date
for compliance and authorized private contractors to abate the nuisance; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 8.23.090 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal
Code, the code officer found a public nuisance constituted an immediate hazard or threat of harm,
the code officer did cause an emergency abatement of such nuisance, providing notice to the
parties as circumstances could reasonably allow; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 8.23.180 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal
Code, staff members did keep an accounting of the costs and incidental expenses for abating
such nuisance on each parcel; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council has caused to be prepared a report of unpaid abatement
fees; and,
WHEREAS, a copy of said report is attached hereto, marked Exhibit "A" and made a part
of this Resolution; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council scheduled 7:00 p.m. on May 19, 2021, at the City of Rancho
Cucamonga City Hall located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California as the
time and place for hearing the report and any objections or protests thereto; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council caused notice of the hearing to be mailed certified to the
property owners listed on the report, at their addresses as shown on the last equalized
assessment roll, not less than ten (10) days prior to the date of the hearing; and,
WHEREAS, at the hearing, the City Council heard all objections or protests of property
owners, or their representatives, liable to be assessed for delinquent charges; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council has made such revisions and corrections to the report as it
deems just.
RESOLUTION NO. 2021-039 - Page 1 of 2
Page 128
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the unpaid costs of nuisance abatement set forth in the report attached hereto as
Exhibit "A" are hereby confirmed.
Section 2. That pursuant to California Government Code Sections 38790.1 and 25831, the
delinquent charges set forth in the confirmed report shall constitute special assessments against
the respective parcels of land and is a lien on the property for the amount of the delinquent
charges.
Section 3. That the City Clerk is instructed to file a certified copy of this Resolution, including the
confirmed report, with the San Bernardino County Auditor/Controller for the amounts of the
respective assessments against the respective parcels of land as they appear on the current
assessment (tax) roll.
Section 4. That the City Clerk is instructed to record a certified copy of this Resolution, including
the confirmed report, in the office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County.
Section 5. Collection Procedure. That the assessments shall be collected for the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, California, at the same time and in the same manner as ordinary county ad valorem
property taxes are collected and shall be subject to the same penalties and the same procedure
and sale in case of delinquency as provided for those taxes. All laws applicable to the levy,
collection and enforcement of county ad valorem property taxes shall be applicable to such
assessment, except that if any real property to which such lien would attach has been transferred
or conveyed to a bona fide purchaser for value, or if a lien of a bona fide encumbrancer for value
has been created and attaches thereon, prior to the date on which the first installment of such
taxes would become delinquent, then the lien which would otherwise be imposed by this section
shall not attach to such real property and the delinquent charges, as confirmed, relating to such
property shall be transferred to the unsecured roll for collection.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 19th day of May, 2021.
RESOLUTION NO. 2021-039 - Page 2 of 2
Page 129
RESOLUTION NO. 2021-XXX
EXHIBIT "A"
Assessment
Parcel iv
Balance Due
Fee
Total
11875 BUNKER HILL DR
1090-231-25-0000
$ 3,780.00
$ 70.00 $
3,850.00
7707 BUENA VISTA DR
0207-053-26-0000
1,400.00
70.00
1,470.00
5188 HERMOSA AVE
1074-051-07-0000
3,100.00
70.00
3,170.00
9738 LA VINE
1076-182-28-0000
2,420.00
70.00
2,490.00
11523 GRIMALDI RD
1089-172-02-0000
3,100.00
70.00
3,170.00
12805 GOLDEN LEAF DR
1090-401-26-0000
3,880.00
70.00
3,950.00
9638 ELMWOOD DR
0210-512-25-0000
3,100.00
70.00
3,170.00
13270 WINSLOW DR
0229-481-26-0000
3,780.00
70.00
3,850.00
12015 ASHFORD ST
1090-301-49-0000
10805.00
70.00
1,875.00
12921 EVERMAY Cr
1100-031-35-0000
3,300.00
70.00
3,170.00
6095 LAYTON ST
1062-261-08-0000
30100.00
70.00
3,170.00
8482 KINGMAN Cr
0229-471-37-0000
3,300.00
70.00
3,170.00
13266 BAXTER SPRINGS DR
0229-471-44-0000
3,705.00
70.00
3,775.00
7119 GREEN GLEN CT
0227-012-05-0000
4,100.00
70.00
4,170.00
13760 SANTA MARIA DR
0226-532-18-0000
4,980.00
70.00
5,050.00
9626 HFATHERBROOK PL
0210-471-16-0000
4,100.00
70.00
4,170.00
7639 PINE RIDGE PL
1090-471-08-0000
4,100.00
70.00
4,170.00
13281 JOLIET DR
0229-462-08-0000
4,100.00
70.00
4,170.00
12925 QUAIL CT
1100-021-14-0000
3,100.00
70.00
3,170.00
7482 BUNGALOW
1100-021-61-0000
1,250.00
70.00
1,320.00
7569 KLUSMAN AVE
0208-471-10-0000
930.00
70.00
10000.00
4928 SUND0WNER Cr
1074-511-27-0000
7,700.00
70.00
7,770.00
9003 YEW ST
0208-931-26-0000
1,250.00
70.00
1,320.00
11891 MT WILSON
0225-301-48-0000
5,270.83
70.00
5,340.83
Page 130
Public Hearing for Placement of
Special Assessments and Liens for
Unpaid Abatement Fees
Community Improvement
May 19, 2021
NUISANCE ABATEMENT
Chapter 8.23 of the Municipal Code defines
nuisances which are a threat to the health and safety
of the community.
• Upon receiving notice, property owners or
residents are required to comply.
• When a nuisance is not abated by the responsible
party, officers are authorized and directed to act
utilizing city forces or private contractor.
71
Accumulated fees are documented by the City and
Ae to the City by the property owner.
NUISANCE ABATEMENT
Chapter 8.23 of the Municipal Code defines
nuisances which are a threat to the health and safety
of the community.
• Upon receiving notice, property owners or
residents are required to comply.
• When a nuisance is not abated by the responsible
party, officers are authorized and directed to act
utilizing city forces or private contractor.
71
Accumulated fees are documented by the City and
Ae to the City by the property owner.
COST RECOVERY EFFORTS
• Practice to file Lis Pendens on the property
• Costs recovered only upon sale or refinance of property
• Fiscal responsibility
• Section 8,23,200 allows, upon confirmation by
Council, for a special assessment of the costs
• Timely notification
• Cost recovery
NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS
• Public hearing notices are sent via certified mail at least
10 days prior to public hearing.
• Public hearing notices sent by the City on April 19, 2021,
to property owners on the unpaid abatement list.
• Advertisement in Inland Valley Daily Bulletin on May 8,
2021.
PUBLIC HEARING INQUIRIES
• 25 Notices were mailed to property owners.
• 1 Inquiry received before May 5
• Records indicated this owner had paid and the property
was removed from the list
UNPAID COSTS AS OF MAY 20
• 24 Properties with unpaid abatement fees
• 17 Cannabis abatement
• 7 Nuisance abatement
• Total fees due - $80,250,83
• Payment due by July 31
• Assessment fee - $70,00 per parcel
• Council may revise, correct or modify the report
RECOMMENDATION
• Staff recommends the City Council confirm the
report and authorize the placement of special
assessment and liens against the respective parcels
for collection by the County in the same manner as
ad valorem property taxes.
Questions?
COST RECOVERY EFFORTS
• Practice to file Lis Pendens on the property
• Costs recovered only upon sale or refinance of property
• Fiscal responsibility
• Section 8,23,200 allows, upon confirmation by
Council, for a special assessment of the costs
• Timely notification
• Cost recovery
NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS
• Public hearing notices are sent via certified mail at least
10 days prior to public hearing.
• Public hearing notices sent by the City on April 19, 2021,
to property owners on the unpaid abatement list.
• Advertisement in Inland Valley Daily Bulletin on May 8,
2021.
PUBLIC HEARING INQUIRIES
• 25 Notices were mailed to property owners.
• 1 Inquiry received before May 5
• Records indicated this owner had paid and the property
was removed from the list
UNPAID COSTS AS OF MAY 20
• 24 Properties with unpaid abatement fees
• 17 Cannabis abatement
• 7 Nuisance abatement
• Total fees due - $80,250,83
• Payment due by July 31
• Assessment fee - $70,00 per parcel
• Council may revise, correct or modify the report
RECOMMENDATION
• Staff recommends the City Council confirm the
report and authorize the placement of special
assessment and liens against the respective parcels
for collection by the County in the same manner as
ad valorem property taxes.
Questions?
DATE: May 19, 2021
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY: John R. Gillison, City Manager
SUBJECT: Consideration Whether to Appeal the Action of the Planning Commission
in Approving Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20164, Minor Design Review
DRC2020-00138, and Conditional Use Permit DRC2020-00087. (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council Consider whether to appeal the action of the Planning
Commission in approving Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20164, Minor Design Review
DRC2020-00138, and Conditional Use Permit DRC2020-00087 for the proposed development
of a gas station and convenience store located at Archibald Avenue and 9" Avenue.
BACKGROUND:
The proposed project and related entitlements, including a request for a Public Convenience and
Necessity (DRC2020-00087) to allow off -site alcohol sales in an overcencentrated census tract
were initially heard by the Planning Commission on February 24, 2021. At that hearing, Staff
recommended the Commission deny the project due to the overconcentration of off -site alcohol
sales in that census tract and as a result of neighborhood concerns about the overconcentration
of off -site alcohol sales, presence of a gas station with a convenience store, and the proximity to
schools.
After some discussion, the Planning Commission voted to deny the Public Convenience and
Necessity application and continue the rest of the items to a future hearing date. Staff was
directed to go back and work with the applicant to make changes to the project. Commissioners
expressed the following concerns:
1. Grocery and Fresh Food Options: Commissioners expressed a desire to see expanded
fresh food options so that the proposed convenience store would effectively serve the
same function as a small grocery store or market in order to benefit the local residents;
2. Signage and Exterior Illumination: Commissioners expressed concern that exterior
illumination, including that from signage, would create a nuisance for residents across the
street;
3. Equity: several Commissioners noted the lack of quality grocery amenities within the
southwest area of the City, questioning whether the proposed service station with a
convenience store and restaurant would be a benefit to the Southwest Rancho
Cucamonga neighborhood;
4. Concentration of Service Stations: Commissioners also noted a perceived concern related
to the number of service stations located within close proximity to the project.
Page 131
ANALYSIS:
Following the February 24, 2021 public hearing, the applicant revised the project in an effort to
address the Commission's stated concerns and questions and amended the project to now
include the following:
1. In order to improve services offered to local residents, the areas within the proposed
convenience store which were previously dedicated to alcohol sales have now been
replaced with "fresh food" areas;
2. Lighting and signage shall be treated sensitively so as not to cause a nuisance to the
residences across Archibald Avenue. Specifically, all wall signage along the Archibald
frontage shall be either externally illuminated or "halo" lit, so as to minimize any impacts
and improve aesthetics. The tri-colored band feature surrounding the building will not be
illuminated;
Beyond the above -mentioned revisions to the project, and in response to the Commission's
concerns regarding this project being a high -quality project to the benefit of the Southwest Rancho
Cucamonga neighborhood, the applicant has also revised the project to include:
Electric Vehicle charging stations — the applicant will install one Level 2 and one DC
Fast Charger at the subject location. Both stations will have two ports each. The site
plan has been revised to reflect the location of these chargers;
In the event that the service station will sell diesel gasoline, the applicant has agreed
to replace regular diesel with Bio-Diesel gasoline;
The applicant has also agreed to design the building to LEED Silver standards and
install appropriate drought -tolerant landscaping.
Lastly, and in response to another concern that was raised at the public hearing related to the
sale of tobacco, the applicant has agreed not to advertise any tobacco or tobacco -related products
along the Archibald Avenue frontage within view of the nearby elementary school. Further, the
applicant has agreed that all tobacco and tobacco -related products will be located behind the
cashier's counter within the store so as not to be easily accessible by minors.
In the ensuing time, the City Council approved a service station moratorium; however, any project
which was already deemed complete was given six months to pull building permits, if they
obtained final approval. Three service stations were included in this category. One station was
already built but was under remodel. A second station was entitled but not built. A third station
was the proposed project, which was going back to the Planning Commission for further review.
No substantive conversation about the merits of any of those locations ever occurred; the City
Council instead provided a process exemption to allow those projects to pursue their permits to a
final conclusion based on the unique merits and circumstances of each project.
Appeal
Section 17.14.070 C of the RCMC provides in part:
"A majority of the city council may appeal an action of the planning commission. If an appeal is
made by the city council, there shall be a presumption applied that the reason for the appeal is
that the appealed action has significant and material effects on the quality of life within the city.
Notwithstanding section 17.14.070.B (Filing an Appeal), no other reason need be or shall be
Page 2
Page132
stated by the city council and no appeal fee shall be required. There shall be no presumption or
inference of bias shall be made because of such an appeal."
The Planning Commission reviewed this item with the proposed changes listed above on May 12,
2021. From the outset, the Planning Commission was divided in their reasoning and unclear in
their discussion about impacts, or lack thereof; multiple questions were raised by Commissioners
which were not able to be addressed either due to time or lack of notice. Further, as was noted
in the discussion, this project has the potential for significant and material effects on the quality of
life within the City and adjacent area that the Council may wish to review and discuss.
After the initial Commission discussion, two Commissioners opposed the project in part because
of their concerns that this was not the highest and best use for the site. Concerns were also noted
in regards to neighborhood objections about the project. These same Commissioners expressed
a desire to see something other than a service station and convenience store in southwest
Cucamonga where there is already more of both uses than anywhere else in the City. Finally,
questions were also raised about the health impacts of the project including how it was designed,
will operate and whether the applicant was truly selling fresh foods, if so to what degree, and
would that continue permanently or be phased out.
Two Commissioners supported the project. Both of them expressed unconditional support for the
project, stating that the applicant had made extensive changes already and more changes were
not fair. Those same Commissioners felt that a service station and convenience store were
indeed the highest and best for that site and neighborhood, and the fact that there were many
other similar uses in close proximity showed a genuine market need and community desire for
this type of project.
One Commissioner initially indicated support for the project, while explaining they had some
uncertainties about particular details, but initially concluded that the project was appropriate for
that neighborhood. Subsequently, the same Commissioner then asked to make additional
comments and indicated, after hearing other Commissioners, that they also had questions related
to verifying and understanding health outcomes and healthy design and operation of the project.
Staff was unprepared, having been given no notice of these questions, and was unable to provide
the requested Healthy Design Checklist, how the project compared against that checklist, or what
Healthy RC improvements might be made to the project for improved health outcomes and fresh
and healthy choices.
At that point in the meeting, the Chair then made a motion to approve the project, received a
second, and on a voice vote the project was approved 3-2. The Commissioner who was first
supportive, then in opposition, ultimately voted in favor of the project but with no further
explanation. Staff was never able to substantively address any of the underlying concerns about
the healthy nature and how the project would fare against the Healthy Design Checklist because
no time was provided to bring the project back. It was also clear there was confusion by the
Commission about whether the City Council's decision to allow this project (and others) a six-
month window from the moratorium was a process exemption or reflected underlying substantive
support for the project.
Given the confused nature of the PC discussion and the lack of clarity around the "healthy"
operation of the project, I am placing this item on the CC agenda to determine if the City Council
wishes to call the item for appeal. In the event the item is appealed, Staff will then analyze the
project using the Healthy Development Checklist as well as any applicable Healthy RC standards.
If the item is not appealed, the project approvals will be final.
Page 3
Page 133
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact associated with this consideration.
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:
The City Council's vision to create a world -class community, that is equitable, sustainable and
rich in opportunity for all to thrive. This vision is articulated in Core Values that include promoting
a healthy community for all, building a family -oriented atmosphere, equitable prosperity for all,
and embracing and anticipating the future by providing a high quality of life for all. Ensuring that
new development is compatible with and a benefit to existing neighborhoods is part and parcel to
fostering the high quality of life commensurate with a world -class community. This project has
significant and material effects on the quality of life within the City that the Council may wish to
consider. Those issues include, but are not limited to, the location and concentration of gas
stations and the availability of healthy food sources within the community. This consideration will
provide that opportunity for the City Council to verify the proposed development will meet
expectations and ensure potentially deleterious effects on quality of life are fully addressed to the
City Council's satisfaction.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 - Healthy Development Checklist
Page 4
Page134
11 THY A
Il��/a�Il:
Riverside
Un{Xersity
HE �iPH SYSTEM
Public Health
This publication was developed by the Riverside University Health System - Public Health. Thank you to
the contributors: Michael Osur, MBA, Miguel Vazquez, AICP, Salomeh Wagaw MPH. A list of partners
who helped shaped this checklist can be found on the following page.
Suggested Citation: Riverside University Health System - Public Health. Healthy Development Checklist,
2017.
Page 136
The Healthy Development Checklist was commissioned by the
Riverside University Health System -Public Health and produced
by Raimi + Associates.
The project was funded with a BEYOND grant from the Western
Riverside Council of Governments and produced in
collaboration with the San Bernardino Council of Governments.
We wish to thank the following organizations and individuals for
providing their valuable feedback on this checklist:
American Planning Association, California Chapter,
Inland Empire Section- John Hildebrand
California Baptist University- Marshare Penny
ChangeLab Solutions- Eric Calloway
City of Coachella- Louis Lopez
City of Rancho Cucamonga - John Gillison
City ofJurupa Valley- Laura Roughton
CityofPalm Desert- Lauri Aylaian & Ryan Stendell
City of Riverside -AI Zelinka
City ofVictorville- Michael Szarzynski
Claremont Graduate School- Kimberly Morones
Coachella Valley Association of Governments- LeGrand
Velez
Health Assessment and Research for Communities -
Jenna LeComte-Hinely
Lewis -San Antonio Healthy Communities Institute -
Angelica Baltazar
National Community Renaissance -Alexa Washburn
Partners for Better Health - Evette d e Luca
Prevention Institute- Rachel Bennett
Public Health Alliance -Carla Blackwater
San Bernardino County Public Health Department -
Corwin Porter, Trudy Raymundo & Scott Rigsby
San Bernardino County Land Use Services - Tom
Hudson, Karen Watkins, & Linda Mawby
San Bernardino Council of Governments -Josh Lee
Transportation & Land Management Agency- Steve
Weiss
Western Riverside County of Governments- Jennifer
Ward & Andrea Howard
Page 137
The Healthy Development Checklist is intended to help communities across the region incorporate
health into everyday life. It is a major step forward in Riverside County's (also known as the Riverside
University Health System) continuing drive to build healthy communities. Beginning in 2011, with the
adoption of the Healthy Communities Element as part of the County's General Plan and the Healthy
Riverside County Resolutionwe have continued to encourage the inclusion of health in planning and
transportation policy in the County and in its 28 cities.' The Checklist has also garnered the support of
regional partners, including the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority and Western
Riverside Council of Governments. Both of these partners are working with Riverside County to
promote a broader use of this Heahh Development Checklist, including in San Bernardino County.
An overarching principle in the Healthy Development Checklist is Equity. Health equity is ensuring that
all people have full and equal access to opportunities that enable them to lead healthy lives. This
approach to health equity has informed the content and strategies in the Healthy Development
Checklist.
E Engagement and Empowerment.
All of us must work collectively to ensure our communities are engaged in the planning
process. We must empower our constituents to be engaged in decision -making by providing
accurate, easy to understand and timely information. Engagement and Empowerment of our
communities allows for inclusion and a higher sense of buy in.
Q Quality.
We must ensure that our communities are built to the highest quality possible. This means
keeping healthy communities as the focus and ensuring that where people live, work, play
and learn provides them with opportunities to build health into their everyday life.
U Utilization.
How we utilize our limited resources is essential to ensure we can serve our growing
population. We must build complete streets that encourage active transportation, healthy
eating and active living.
Increase healthy behaviors.
We must build our communities so that there is easy access to parks, open spaces,
recreational activities, shopping, jobs and educational opportunities. Healthy behaviors lead
to lower morbidity and mortality rates thereby, improving and extending an overall quality of
life.
T Transportation.
The provision of active transportation infrastructure for walking, biking and access to transit
ensures greater healthy options for our residents.
Y Youth.
By building healthy communities where youth can thrive and grow with clean air, water,
access to healthy foods, parks and active transportation we can increase the opportunities
for our children to live a healthier life.
For additional information on community health data in Riverside County, you can visit SHAPE Riverside County.
Page 138
HEALTHY DEVELOPMENT CHECKLIST & CRITERIA
The design of our communities has a great impact on our health and the well-being of our residents.
This checklist provides criteria, empirical evidence, and best practices for new healthy development.
Our goal is to encourage developers, city officials, and decision makers to use this tool to help guide
the development of neighborhoods that promote physical and mental health, encourage community
engagement, and improve quality of life for all. Community members may also find this tool as a useful
resource to better understand healthy development practices.
WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF THE CHECKLIST?
The Healthy Development Checklist was developed to provide criteria for healthy development
practices in the Inland Empire. It is intended to be used as a tool to judge the overall health
performance and supportiveness of new development projects. While not every criterion will apply to
every development project, projects should aim to comply with as many of the criteria as possible to
promote health through their development project.
HOW TO USE THE CHECKLIST?
The Healthy Development Checklist is organized into six topical categories:
1) Active Design
2) Connectivity
3) Public Safety
4) Environmental Health
5) Community Cohesion
6) Access to Food, Services, and Jobs
A summary checklist is followed by a more detailed catalogue of the checklist. For each checklist
question, projects can assess their performance as follows:
• "COMPLIES WITH ALL CRITERIA" (if a project meets all criteria)
• "COMPLIES WITH SOME CRITERIA" (if the project meets some, but not all of the bulleted
criteria)
• "DOES NOT COMPLY" (if the project does not meet any of the criteria)
• "N/A" (if the criteria does not apply to this project)
WHO SHOULD USE THE CHECKLIST?
Developers, planning staff, and decision -makers should use the Healthy Development Criteria:
• Developers should refer to the criteria and checklist as a guide for the design and planning
of a project in the early stages, preferably before submitting an application for development
review.
• City staff can use the checklist to review development proposals and make
recommendations to both developers and decision -makers. The checklist can also be used
to inform staff reports and public meetings on projects.
• Decision -makers are encouraged to use the completed project checklist to better
understand the health outcomes of a proposed project.
• Community members and advocates can use the checklist as a resource and tool to guide
healthy development in their communities.
Checklist I Page 5
Page139
SUMMARY CHECKLIST
ACTIVE DESIGN
1. NEIGHBORHOOD AMENITIES. How well does the
project support access to neighborhood amenities
(e.g., convenience store, dry cleaning, community
center, caf6, etc.) within reasonable walking
distance from residential developments?
2. PARKS AND OPEN SPACE. How well does the
project incorporate a park or open space within
reasonable walking distance of all residential
development?
3. PEDESTRIAN ENVIRONMENT. How well does the
project contribute to creating a safe and
comfortable pedestrian environment for residents
of all ages?
4. SIDEWALKS. How well does the project create or
contribute to a complete network of sidewalks?
5. FRONTAGE DESIGN. How well does the project
incorporate attractive, pedestrian -scale exteriors
and massing to encourage walkability for people of
all ages?
6. PHYSICAL ACTIVITY. How well does the project
incorporate design features to promote the
physical activity of all building occupants?
CONNECTIVITY
7. NETWORK. How well does the project leverage
public open space, sidewalks, pedestrian
amenities, bicycle facilities, and multi -use trails to
connect safely and comfortably to surrounding
neighborhoods?
8. WALKABILITY. How well does the project enhance
walkability by providing a highly -connected street
network?
9. TRANSIT ACCESS. How well does the project
provide all residents with safe access to transit and
transit facilities within reasonable walking distance?
10. BICYCLE CONNECTIVITY. How well does the
project provide high levels of bicycle connectivity
through a safe, well -marked and complete bicycle
network?
Complies with
Complies with
Does not
N/A
all criteria
some criteria
comply
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
Checklist I Page 6
Page 140
PUBLIC SAFETY
11. INJURY PREVENTION. How well does the project
foster injury prevention through the use of traffic
calming features, such as bulb outs and speed
humps, safe pedestrian crossings, and moderate
roadway speeds?
12. SAFE ACCESS TO SCHOOLS. How well does the
project incorporate safe access to schools within a
reasonable walking distance?
13. LIGHTING. How well does the project provide
adequate neighborhood lighting to prevent crime
and increase safety?
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
14. SMOKING. How well does the project
incorporate efforts to restrict smoking in multi -family
development and open spaces?
15. NEAR -ROAD POLLUTION. How well does the
project incorporate efforts to protect residents from
the harmful effects of high volume roads?
16. NOISE POLLUTION. How well does the project
mitigate noise pollution for all residents?
17. ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE. How well does the
project mitigate any impacts that would
disproportionately affect disadvantaged
communities?
18. INDOOR AIR QUALITY. How well does the project
incorporate the use of materials and products that
support healthy indoor quality?
COMMUNITY COHESION
19. PASSIVE SPACES. How well does the project
incorporate spaces that facilitate social
engagement?
20. RECREATIONAL SPACES. How well does the
project incorporate facilities and access to a
variety of recreational opportunities for all users?
21. COMMUNITY SPACES. How well does the project
incorporate facilities and access to a multi -purpose
community space accessible to the public?
Complies with
Complies with
Does not
N/A
all criteria
some criteria
comply
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Checklist I Page 7
Page 141
ACCESS TO FOOD, JOBS, AND SERVICES Call ncprliteriaith
22. GROCERY. How well does the project integrate ❑
access to a full -service grocery store (e.g., sells
meat, dairy, fruits and vegetables) within
reasonable walking distance of all residents?
23. COMMUNITY GARDEN. How well does the ❑
project incorporate space for growing food onsite
through community gardens, edible landscaping,
or small-scale farming within a reasonable walking
distance from residential development?
24. FARMER'S MARKET. How well does the project ❑
designate space or provide access to a farmer's
market within a reasonable walking distance?
25. HEALTHY FOOD. How well does the project ❑
maintain a balance of healthy and unhealthy food
retailers?
26. JOBS. How well does the project design promote ❑
shorter commutes and better access to jobs?
27. HEALTH SERVICES. How well does the project
provide future residents with access to health ❑
services?
28. CHILDCARE. How well does the project support ❑
increased access to affordable and high -quality
childcare?
29. MIXED -USE. How well does the project integrate ❑
mixed -use development?
30. MIXED HOUSING. How well does the project
contribute to a mix of housing options that will allow ❑
all potential household sizes, incomes, and types to
become neighbors and share available amenities?
Complies with Does not N/A
some criteria comply
❑ ❑ ❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
Checklist I Page 8
Page 142
DETAILED HEALTHY DEVELOPMENT CRITERIA
1. NEIGHBORHOOD TIES. How well does the project support access to neighborhood
amenities (e.g., convenience store, dry cleaning, community center, cafe, etc.) within
reasonable walking distance from residential developments?
RATIONALE:
Neighborhoods that include destinations within reasonable walking distance are linked to
increased total physical activity of residents. A "walk shed" radius is a useful measure to delineate
the area from which a place is reachable by a short walk, commonly understood as up to one half
mile.2 An effective circulation system links people to key neighborhood destinations efficiently
and safely.
CRITERIA:
Review the project for the following features:
• Access to one or more existing or planned transit stops (including bus, streetcar, informal
transit stop, rapid transit light or heavy rail stations, commuter radstahons) within a M mile
walk distance,and
• At least two destinations within a M mile walking distance ofall or most residents, including
parks, schools, commercial centers, andofhces.
EVIDENCE:
Congress forNew Urbanism. 2001.'Ped5heds."&ansportinYon Txh Sheet. 3etneved fiom:
http.//mu.civkc ons.noV if w ..mu.oigm1o.VCNU Ped 5hedspdf
t mkin, H. andL. think, k Jackson 2004. Urban SprawiandPubbc Health: Designing Nanning andeuikling fin-Heakhy
Communigez Washington, OC. is/and Press.
x/•ngerman M. and ✓. Sails, S, Ryan, L t nk,P. Nader. 2007.Asrinagen ofneighborhooddeetin andrecredien
onviiiinnientionablies withphyacaiactiii iindbodyin z indexn addescesi."American ✓oumaiofHealtb Promotion
21(4) 2/4-//.
Mouxin, 5.2012.'WdkAppind"eetterCNsand Towns. 3ehievedfrom: http.✓/bege¢iHes.nin/ ws-opinioNbiogs/steve-
mouiv1Vl&45/ 1karien1
2. PARKS AND OPEN SPACE. How well does the project incorporate a park or open space within
reasonable walking distance of all residential development?
RATIONALE:
The close proximity of parks and recreation services encourages use, physical activity, and mental
health benefits for people of all ages. Parks can also be used as spaces for community events and
civic engagement. People living within a half mile of a park consider facilities close enough to walk
to.
2 For the purposes of this Checklist, any references to a "reasonable walking distance" should consider the walk
shed as a measure for walkability and also the best applicability to the local community context (e.g., urban,
suburban, rural). While practical influences should always be considered (e.g., safety, shortcuts, etc.), projects
should aim for at least a 1h mile walk distance, but a Y. mile walk distance is preferred.
Active Design I Page 9
Page 143
CRITERIA:
Review the project for the following features:
• Every residentfives within !4 ofa park orpublic open space,- and
• A ratio ofatleast 5acres ofparklandper 1,000 residents,- and
• Joint- use agreements withhicalschooldistiicts orotherentities(If necessary, to achieve
theseparkstandards.)
EVIDENCE:
Low, Richard. 2006. Lastaildin the weeds. New York Algonquin Hooks.
Trustfn-Pubhc Land 2016. Parks on the dock: Why we Beleve in the 10-minute nelk"Rehieved 8om:
hops✓/ ..qw. onphlog1whyLthn lRminute-walUsm. 000lboM4tld50wn 1fi0ldyt16
Wesbup, L-2002. Quimby AR 101:An Abbmviated Ov iew.mGliomia Depatl entofParks andRecmab'on. Remeved
tom: htgs.// ..parkscagov/pages/J95/les/quimbyl01.pif
3. PEDESTRIAN ENVIRONMENT. How well does the project contribute to creating a safe and
comfortable pedestrian environment for residents of all ages?
RATIONALE:
Walking is positively correlated with the presence of sidewalks and perceived neighborhood
aesthetics and safety. Perceptions matter: the extent to which a neighborhood is perceived as
walkable is correlated with residents' likelihood of participating in regular physical activity. A
quality pedestrian environment also creates a physical and psychological buffer between
pedestrians, bikes and cars, in addition to providing shade. A carefully planned built environment
can be highly effective in preventing pedestrian injuries.
CRITERIA:
Review the project for the fallowing features:
• Pedestrian signals, in pavement Hashing fights, four-waystops, crosswalks, and/or
pedestrian overpasses to ensure pedestrian safety, and
• Gently sloped walks instead of or in addition to steps in public open spaces,' and
• Barrier -free paths that facilitate access for all users,' and
• Legible signage that minimizes confusion and communicates important waytinding
information to all users (e.g., seniors, deaf, multi language),and
• Street trees planted between the vehicle travel way and sidewalk at intervals of no more
than 50 feet along at feast 60% of the total existing and planned block length within a
project and on blocks bordering the project' and
• Within ten years, shade from trees orpermanent structures overatleast 40%of the total
length of the existing and planned sidewalks within or bordering the project (measured
from the estimated crown diameter).
EVIDENCE:
ReMbg, R. A, and T. M�a rtq S A Ferguson. 2003. A review of evidence -based hnbc engine enngmeasuresdesigned
to mduce pedesman-monevehide crashes"Amencan Journal ofPulec Heath 93(9), 1456-146 ..
5 urn xso Transpor onandAir Qua/iy Collaborabve. 6estPacbcesfix Complet 5muns"Rebievedfrom:
hbpsJ1 ..smarfgmwthamenca.og/appl7 gary/documenWs/ sources cshistpunibcie-s evnentopdf
U.S Green 6uildng Council. 2016. LEED v4forNeighborhoodDevelopment Rier evedhom:
http:✓/ .usgbc.og/mmsourco.v dYv neighborhood -development current version
Active Design I Page 10
Page 144
4. SIDEWALKS. How well does the project create or contribute to a complete network of sidewalks?
RATIONALE:
The presence of a complete sidewalk network is a major determinant of whether or not someone
may choose walking for any given trip. Walking is positively correlated with the presence of
sidewalks and perceived neighborhood aesthetics and safety. Lack of physical activity is a major
factor in Americans' health. The provision of a network that facilitates walking can help bridge this
physical activity gap and directly influence measurable health indicators.
CRITERIA:
Review the project for the following features.
• Sidewalks on both sides of all new and redeveloped streets," and
• Minimum sidewalk width of feet along residential streets and 8 feet along commercialor
mixed use streets," and
• Continuous sidewalks across the entire project street network (excepting alleys and
serwce-ormmtedstreets)," and
• Incorporation of universal design features to ensure that all users fincluding those using
wheelchairs, walkers, pushing strollers, and hand carts) can easily trovelto neighborhood
destinations, including:
o Multi usepathways thatare separated from vehiculartrafic and thatfacilitate
pedestrian and wheelchair access,
o Vlantingstrips on bath sides ofa//streets withoutprotruding into the path oftravel,'
and
o Shortnght-turn radii formajorroadsandrimps crossingpedestrian rights -of -way.
EVIDENCE:
Amencan Association u(Stre Highwayand T nsponab'on0 oa/s.2011.APob'ry on Geomerc Design ofHighways and
Sbees.W hington,DC American Assocwb'on o(Shee Highway and T nsporab'on Ofhciah.
Hood/at, L2003 "Accessible Sidewalks and5beet Goslings -an informations/guide."USDepart ento Transpoda on,
redera/Hgh yAdminisbahon. Remevedfiom: http.// ..biknvu%irg/pdksaopada lhwapdr
5. FRONTAGE DESIGN. How well does the project incorporate attractive, pedestrian -scale exteriors
and massing to encourage waIkability for people of all ages?
RATIONALE:
Building design greatly affects our sense of comfortwhile walking, biking, or driving, as well as our
connection to a place and our neighbors. Providing opportunities to have frequent face-to-face
contact in a neighborhood has been shown to promote social ties among neighbors. Architectural
features such as porches and transparent shop fronts that promote visibility from a building's
exterior have been linked to higher levels of perceived social support and lower levels of
psychological distress.
CRITERIA:
Review the project for the following features:
• Buildings with primary entrances oriented towards the sidewa/k/stmetorpub/ic open
spaces," and
Active Design I Page 11
Page 145
• Buildings that are scaled appropriately to the width ofthe stmetto create a p/easantpublic
realm environment(genemlly using a rule of thumb ofat/east 1 footofbui/ding heightfor
every 1.5 feet from stmetcenter/ine to building faptle); and
• Surface parking is located behind bui/dings(orto the side in certain contexts).
EVIDENCE:
Gianiiv ab Soluh'ons. (n. d) Pedeshian Ffiendly Code Dimctwy Eyes on the 5heet"Rehieved from:
http.✓/..changefabsofutionsoqi1chAthood-obesiy/eyes-sheet
Lund,Hollie.2002. Pedesman EnvironmentsandSonseofCommuniy'JoumalofPlanning EducahonandRese h.21
(3). 301-312.
SpeckJ2012 Walkable Gy How Downtown can SavrA onca, One 5tp ata]Ime. New York NorthP nst ss.
Wekedy, G2000."Emm Eyes on the Sheets Safe Ghes."Places 13(1).4 9.
6. PHYSICAL ACTIVITY. How well does the project incorporate design features to promote the
physical activity of all building occupants?
RATIONALE:
Certain features can be incorporated into the design of buildings that help people increase their
physical activity as apart of daily life. Active design strategies include the convenient placement of
stairs, building and site design to encourage walking, and the provision of spaces for physical
activity.
CRITERIA:
Review the projectfor the following features.
• Placementofstairs within 25'ofan entrance and before any elevator,'
• Stan -prompts and signage at elevatorbanks,
'
• Windows&skylights to make enclosed stairs more visible and appealing,
• No unnecessary escalators and elevators,-
• Elimination ofphysicalbarriers (such as walls,door locks, and poor placementofbudding
elements) that can deter physical act)vity.
EVIDENCE:
CentrbrAc ve Design2010. A[ vo Design Guidelines:Pmmohng PhysicalAc viyand Health In Design."GyofNew
York.
Active Design I Page 12
Page 146
7. NETWORK. How well does the project leverage public open space, sidewalks, pedestrian
amenities, bicycle facilities, and multi -use trails to connect safely and comfortably to
surrounding neighborhoods?
RATIONALE:
Research indicates that children who bike or walk to recreational sites (parks, playgrounds, etc.)
use sites more often. The safer it is to bike or walkto play sites, the more likely it is that kids will
bike or walk there. Furthermore, trail use is significantly correlated with user proximity, with
evidence showing thattrails within at least'f. mile of every residence is ideal for maximizing access
and use. Trails and parks that are well maintained, safe, clean, well -lit, and have facilities, such as
restrooms, drinking fountains, and exercise equipment, are used more and contribute to higher
physical activity levels among users.
CRITERIA:
Review the project for the following features:
• Pedestrian amenities atparks and on trails,including seating, restrooms, signage, lighting,
landscaping, shade structure, trash cans and drinking fountains," and
• Park design that emphasizes connectivity to otherpark/trad access points within
reasonable walking distance, including complete streets design, close proximity to transit
stops, and safe pedestrian and bike routes.
EVIDENCE:
Kacrynski, A and K. Henderson. 2007."Envimnmentalror la sofphysicala vify: a review of evidenceaboutparks and
recreation."Leisure5ciences29(4}315 54.
Nag'aria/CenterforEnvimnmenGl Health. 2013. Parks and 7 ik Hea/th/mpactAssessment CenfersforDisease Control
andP veng"on. a travedgom: https✓/ .cdcgov/healtbypbceslparks trds/secsonch"in
Shu/aker, B.. and J./ oHT. Ker, andK Hart2016. Park DesignforPhysica/Acavifyand Health. San Francisco : TrustgN
Public/and
8. WALKABILITY. How well does the project enhance walkability by providing a highly -connected
street network?
RATIONALE:
There is ample evidence that greater street connectivity and higher residential density are related
to higher total physical activity and lower BMI. Adults are more likely to walk if they live in
neighborhoods with high connectivity and intersection density, high population density, and a mix
of land uses.
A high intersection density is one of the single most important variables for determining whether a
place will have high enough levels of connectivity to foster increased levels of walking, as well as
for increasing transit use and reducing vehicle distance traveled. Grid street patterns that decrease
distance between destinations encourage walking and help foster physical activity.
CRITERIA:
Review the project for the following features:
Connectivity I Page 13
Page 147
• No cube -sacs, courts, and paseos without through access by pedestrians and bicyclists to
otherstreets, courts, paseos, orparks,'
• Aninternalconneclivityofatleast 140motorized/non-motorizedintenectionspersquare
mile, and
• Small, walkable blocks with perimeters no more than 1600 feet long,and
• At least one through connection (street, alley, trail/path) of all blocks and the project
boundary every 800 feet. Does not apply to blocks orportions of the boundary where
connections cannotbe made due to physical obstacles.
EVIDENCE:
Frankt, Schmid T,5aldsJ, Chapman J,Smkns B.2005 Inkingobjern'veymeasumdphysicl/ virywithobjecbvey
measured urban form: findingshom 5MARnh1Q."Amenc in Jouma/ofPrevenbin Medons28: 117 125.
5tng(fl2015."Block size-basedmiaiums ofsbeetconiam iy: ACdnif/ msvwnt and oewappmach."Urban Design
/ntmab'onal2i)(11 1-12.
U5. Green Building Counc2 2016. LEED v4IDrNeighborhoodDevelopment Romovedfrom:
http.✓/ .usgbco sources4eed-v4-neighborhood-developmentcurrent-version
9. TRANSIT ACCESS. How well does the project provide all residents with safe access to transit
and transit facilities within reasonable walking distance?
RATIONALE:
In addition to walking and biking, public transit offers a potential alternative to driving. Public
transit improvements can also result in other benefits, including reduced traffic crashes, improved
physical fitness and health, energy conservation, increased community livability, increased
affordability, and economic development. Urban form, including the presence of compact
development and access to public transit, tend to have a positive association with physical activity.
CRITERIA:
Review the project for the following features:
At least50% of dwelling units and nonresidential use entrances have access to existing or
planned transitstops(including bus, streetcar, informaltmnsitstop, rapid transit light or
heavy railstations, commuterrailstations) within a !4 mile walk distance; and
Compactdevelopmentand mixed land use that maximizes walkable access to public
transit,- and
Transit facilities designed to maximize user comfort while waiting by incorporating shade
structures, street furniture and relevant information/signage.
EVIDENCE:
American Pubbc TransportNonh ocamon 2009 Dah'ningAreas of/nNuence."(RecommendedPracbte) Removedhwn
http:// .apt. mMmsourceslnndards/ cumenWAPTA%205UD5-UD-RP-001-09.pdf
Convergence Partenship. 2" Healthy, Equitb/e T nsportb'on Pohay Rommnd hom:
http.// .convegencepar hip.og/sitesrdehu/t lo/ healtb rans hi//book fi /.PDF
PonyM, A andL SmeadiTes.).2015. Mobiby, UnivmauL4esign, Health, and P/ e(A Research Brat). Health and Races
/nibativo Rein ved from: htip.✓/ searchgsd harwrdedu/hapVfllo /2015/11/HAP/ ResearchBnef UniversaMesign-
112315pdf
Urnan, T. 2010. Evaluabng Pubbc Tramportbon Health Benefit."American Public T nsportbon Association. eeteved
bom:httpl/ ..apt.c lm/ urces/ po ndpubliaUonV/ cumenWAPTA_Hasib_Benefits Lmia raf
Connectivity I Page 14
Page 148
10. BICYCLE CONNECTIVITY. How well does the project provide high levels of bicycle connectivity
through a safe, well -marked and complete bicycle network?
RATIONALE:
Good bicycle connectivity and safe bicycle facilities can have dramatic public health benefits. New
bicycling facilities can dramatically lower health care costs. Additionally, communities that support
transit use, walking, and bicycling are associated with more physical activity and lower body
weights. Key metrics to the success of bicycle networks is trail/bikeway accessibility. Use of trails
and bikeways is negatively correlated with distanceto the facility.
CRITERIA:
Review the project for the following features:
• On-streetbicycle faci/ihes(C/ass//or Class IV) on moststreets; and
• C/ass/Vfacifihes onfimitedaccess roadways with higherrates ofspeedandlarger
intersection spacing,- and
• Highly visible orcolor-codedmarkings and/orbicyche lane striping on the roadsurface for
a painted buffer between the bicycle and travel lanes).; and
• Where appropriate,"bicycleboulevards"withnarrowertmvellanes, slowertargetspeeds,
unique signage, and bicycle pnonfz fion through vehicle barriers or other visual cues
EVIDENCE:
Gotschi, T.2011. "Costs&benefits of8iryding /nveshnents in Portland, O egon."Journal ofPhy kalAc viy&HealtbgtIJ:
549-55&
Handy, S. L 2004. Cn6caiAxseemont ofthe Utorieure on the Relatlonships among Lansporta6on, land Use, and Physical
Actively Washington, O transportation Research boardand/nstme s ofMorhone Coronation on Phy mlrloviry,H lM
TransportGbo, and land Use.
PucherJ,and J. Dill, ands Handy. 2010. 9nbasbu m,p grams,andpdidostoncreas hki ing.anintem Umd
rewew.'Preven6Ye Medicine 50. 10125.
Connectivity I Page 15
Page 149
11. INJURY PREVENTION. How well does the project foster injury prevention through the use of
traffic calming features, such as bulb outs and speed humps, safe pedestrian crossings, and
moderate roadway speeds?
RATIONALE:
Vehicle speed is one of the most critical variables that determines traffic collision severity. The use
of design features that moderate traffic speeds and increase driver awareness of bicycle and
pedestrian activity all help to reduce the occurrence and severity of injury of collisions. This is
especially true for those with limited mobility, such as elderly pedestrians and children. Risk of
injury is also greater on busier streets and streets with more than two lanes. However, pedestrian
safety can be improved through the provision of continuous wide sidewalks, well -marked and
signalized crosswalks, traffic controls at intersections; and trafficcalminginfrastructure.
CRITERIA:
Review the project for the following features:
• Traffic -calming infrastructure, such as speed humps, bulb -outs, and chicanes,- and
• To the extentpossible,neighborhood//oca/streets have a target speed limit of20 miles
per he or and co/%dors/artemils have a target speed limit of30 miles per heur-and
• All vehicle tmvellanes on local streets within the project area are no wider than 10 feet;'
collector streets and roads are no wider than 11 feetand arterial roads have five/lanes
no wider than 12 feet' and
• All two -lane streets have clearly marked space for on-stmentparking and/orbicycle lanes,
'
and
• Outside lane striping to delineate the vehicle trove/ way from on-stmetparking, bicycle
lanes, orunusedshoulderr,and
• Grade -separated cycle tracks OR wide parking lanes (up to 10 feet) where physical
separation between bicycle lanes and on street parking is not desirable or possible, such
as in areas with high parking turnover.
EVIDENCE:
Koepsel( T. 2022 'Gosswalk markings and Me nsk ofpedestnan-motor vehicle col/r'sionsm oldert a tesMens' The
Journal of the Amencan Medca1Associa0on20(1]).2136-2143.
Nah'onalAss iah'on ofGn, Transponsom Officials. Urban SheetOesign Guide. Washington, OC. klandP ss.
Zegeeq C.200L'S Iyrrtsec of markedversusunmarkedcrosswalks at unconholledlmratmns.' Tmnsporritim Rierainb
Recmd(1773): 56-68.
12. SAFE ACCESS TO SCHOOLS. How well does the project incorporate safe access to schools
within reasonable walking distance?
RATIONALE:
The implementation of safe routes to school strategies have resulted in significant decreases in the
number of child pedestrian deaths and injury rates. Additionally, improved safety for students
walking and biking to school also has broader benefits, including reduced transportation costs,
increased connectivity between neighborhoods, and improved student alertness.
Public Safety I Page 16
Page 150
CRITERIA:
Review the project for the following features:
• An attendance boundary thatadheres to these spec✓fieddistances: mostorallstudents
living within a e/4mile walking distance torgrades 8 and below, and 1 112-mile walking
distance forgrades Sand above, of school building.
EVIDENCE:
Boomet, MG, and a Anderson, K. Day, T. McM%lan, M. Af rvo.2005. 'Evaluahon ofthe C lit is Safe Routes to 5chooi
legislah"on: urban form changesand childmn'sa )ve hansporfahtn w school.'Amedon Journal ofPm�nhve Medicine 2a
(2). 13 0,
Nah'ona/Centerfor5a Routesf School.2015. Crang Healthier Generahbns.ALookatthe 10v rsofMe Federa/Safe
Routesfo5choo/Program. Rebieved horn:hf�.//saferoufesinfi.org/siteydefaukf8/es/SRTS IOY rReporfF /.pdt
U.SG nBui/ding Council.( d.) EEDBD C.5chools.Accessto Quakiy Transit Rohevedhom:
http.ir .usoco�lcreditschoolsr w-mnswco&vedrf&5
13. LIGHTING. How well does the project provide adequate neighborhood lighting to prevent
crime and increase safety?
RATIONALE:
Street lighting improvements can help reduce both crime and people's perceptions of fear. In
addition, street lighting can have the effect of increasing activity after dark.
CRITERIA:
Review the project for the following features.
• Lighting that enhances visibility ofstreets, alleys, windows, walkways, and bikeways for
pedestrians and vehicle traffic. and
• Safepedestnan pathcones thatalign with trafcpaasnis andgenerate a sense of welcome
atall hours of the day,and
• Enough lighting forsafety, while ensuring lighting does notproduceglare forusers,
including pedestrians, drivers, or light trespass to neighbors.
EVIDENCE:
AENA5ecunty Nghhng Cornmihee.2003. Guidehrvlor5 unty Lghhngfr-People, Pmperty andPhhcSpaces"New
York: llluminahng Engineenng5oovhofA nca.
Painter, K. 1996. 7he/n0uence ofSUeetLJghhnglmprovementson Came, Fr andPedesMan SUeet Use, akerdark"
tand peand Urhan Nanning35(2-3).193-201.
Public Safety I Page 17
Page 151
14. SMOKING. How well does the project incorporate efforts to restrict smoking in multi -family
development and open spaces?
RATIONALE:
Each year, smoking causes about one in five deaths in the United States. Smoking continues to be
an ongoing health issue and is one of concern in the Inland Empire. Furthermore, there is
extensive evidence that indicates second hand smoke, especially in shared spaces, such as
muhifamily residential buildings, can be a health hazard for non-smokers in adjoining units.
CRITERIA:
Review the project for the following features:
• No smoking in parks and public plazas, and
• Signage stating smoking bans in parks and public plazas, and
• Restrict smoking in multifamily residential buildings so as to protect tenants from the
effects ofsecondhand smoke generated in nearby or adjoining units.
EVIDENCE:
Cenhi sforDisease Control and Prevention. 2014. Health EHech of Cigarette Smoking" Smoking and Tobacco Use, Data
andStatmies, Fact5hee6. Retrrevedhvm: http.//..cdcgo v�ha co/
dab sbtisti t sheetsfientfi ii W fbcb_cigsmoking/
15. NEAR -ROAD POLLUTION. How well does the project incorporate efforts to protect residents
from the harmful effects of high volume roads?
RATIONALE:
Pollutants from cars, trucks and other motor vehicles are found in higher concentrations near major
roads. People who live, work or attend school near major roads appear to have an increased
incidence and severity of health problems associated with air pollution exposures related to
roadway traffic, including higher rates of asthma onset and aggravation, cardiovascular disease,
impaired lung development in children, pre -term and low-birthweight infants, childhood leukemia,
and premature death.
CRITERIA:
Review the project for the following features:
• Nearroadlandscaping that reduces particle concentrations and noise. Generally, include
context- appropriate vegetation barrier that is at least20 feet and has full coverage (no
gaps),- and
• Locate homes at least 1,000 away from a high -volume road,and
• Install filtration systems for all buildings within 1,000 feet of a high -volume road
EVIDENCE:
Odmmki DepaitmentofEducatrbn. 2015. Sumneshie Communities and5chomplamiing. Retrieved Gom:
top.// .cde. cago 4Wa/by/documenWhestprc susbin.pdf
GilifirmbEnvimnmentuProtm1mnAgengv 201Z Strategies to Reduce Nrfbllutmn 6posure NosrHghVolume
Roadways Retrievedfrom: https//.arb.ogov/chhd bchnicvl adosmy fl LPDF
Environmental Health I Page 18
Page 152
16. NOISE POLLUTION. How well does the project mitigate noise pollution for all residents?
RATIONALE:
Noise pollution can negatively impact the physical and mental health of residents. Unwanted noise
may increase due to population growth, street traffic changes, and even mobile technology. Long
term exposure to excessive noise can lead to stress, fatigue, hearing loss, and loss of productivity.
CRITERIA:
Review the project for the following features:
• Active rooms, such as kitchens, placed in locations thatbuNersounds from roads in rooms
where noise is more problematic, such as bedrooms,and
• Minimize exposure to noise pollution in outdoor spaces byplanting earthen beans with
grasses or shrubs,- and
• Use ofgreen roofs, which can absorb noise and reduce outside sound levels by up to 40-
50 dec✓be/s,' and
• Reduce exposure to noise pollution for building occupants by incorporahngacoustically
designed walls, doubleglazedwindows, and well sealed doors.
EVIDENCE:
B ophy, V. andJOCewis 2011. A Green Vitruvius. Condon: Earthscan.
Kryter, K. 1994. The Handbook of Hearing and the Effects of Noise: Physiology, Psychology, and Public Health. San Diego:
AcademicP ss.
OBce o(Disease Prevention and Heam Pmotion.( d.)ynvironmentalHealth. "Heakhy People 2020. Retrieved hone:
htipsJ/.heal!hypecplegov202Olropics-objectivesRopidenwoomentatheakh
17. ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE. How well does the project mitigate any impacts that would
disproportionately affect disadvantaged communities?
RATIONALE:
The negative impacts of the built environment disproportionately impact disadvantaged
communities, including higher incidences of respiratory disease, cancer, obesity, and
developmental diseases. Community design, together with planning decisions, can play a key role
in making these communities healthier and mitigating the impacts of existing land use patterns
and transportation investments in the region.
CRITERIA:
Review the project for the following features:
• Minimize exposure to hazardous contaminants, including contammatedsoils pesticides,
contaminatedgroundwater, and emissions bynotsiting residential developmentnearor in
the path of exposure sites (e.g., bus fleets stations, factories, powerplants, landfills, and
areas ofpesficide spraying)
• Minimize development ofsensdive land uses- defined as schools, hospitals, residences,
and elderand childcare facilities - nearairpollution sources- including freeways; high
volume roads, airplane landing paths, andpolluting industria/sites.
EVIDENCE:
Gsh u DepartmentofEducatibn. 2015. Sustainable Communities and5choolPlanning. Retieved hone:
hire✓/ .cdecago4Walhp/documnWbesprrncesust in.pdf
Environmental Health I Page 19
Page 153
En Nronme rti/Pmtecthon Agenry2016. "Technical Guidance /orAssaxang Enviuvina nhii✓uiece in RegulahnvAnays&"
ilebieved from: https.// w.epagovlsif Vproduch'oNfiles 2016,Wdocumonwejtg5 6 16_v5l p&
Sinivaun, 5. andl. Q'FaUon, A Dearry2003. C bngHeaRby Communities, Healthy HoonaTi dthy Peradc hnitiatinga
Resea¢h Agenda on the RuikEnvimnmentandP h6c Heakh."American Journal of Public Heallh 93(9): 14461450.
18. INDOOR AIR QUALITY. How well does the project incorporate the use of materials and
products that support healthy indoor quality?
RATIONALE:
Poor indoor quality can contribute to chronic disease, including asthma, heart disease, and cancer.
Poor ventilation, humidity, and exposure to carbon monoxide can exacerbate negative impacts to
health. Most exposure to environmental pollutants occurs by breathing air indoors.
CRITERIA:
Review the project for the following features:
• Building materials that are not known to emit harmful toxins; and
• Reduce occupant exposure to VOCs by using cabinetry, doors, molding, shelving, and trim
materials with low VOCs. Employ caulking, adhesives, paints, varnishes, and other finishes
that are free ofsolvents and VOCS;-and
• Reduce occupant exposure to molds by using mold resistant materials in community
bathrooms and other water sensitive locations.
EVIDENCE:
American Lung odaticm.( d).. He lthyAr&Home."ReMovod&w :http:✓/ ..lung.oig/ouriaitl tives/heakhy-
ier drxirl-home/
EnNonmenlalPmfection Agenry. trd/ % pmvinglndoorArQuality."Rebievedfi m. https✓/ .evego/ndoor-air-
qua/1y-arruhr} mvvrgindoor-air-qua/1y
Environmental Health I Page 20
Page 154
19. PASSIVE SPACES. How well does the project incorporate spaces that facilitate social
engagement?
RATIONALE:
Creating public spaces that promote the engagement of residents and high connectivity of
neighborhoods and services have positive impacts on health. The good design of public spaces is
important to ensuring not only their use, but the encouragement of socialization and activity.
CRITERIA:
Review the project for the following features:
Plazas, a central square, dog runs, and bbq areas that encourage social interaction and
enhance opportunities forphysical activity,and
Seating that encourages people to be comfortable in parks andpublic spaces, -and
Design thatpromotes public gathering and use of open space for activities, places for
food, and flexibility for multiple uses, including:
o Visible and accessible entrances, spaces, and path;
o Functonalstructures,
o Pedestnan and bicyclist access,
o Public art,
o Close access to public transit
EVIDENCE:
FiderThomasWF.r. Mcilahon, and TC.Ihoerig2013. Ten Pnncipiesh Building Heahhy P/ es Washington, DC:
Urbantandinsetute.
PmjeRrorPh&Spaces 2009. Why Public Spaces Fail. eem"evedfrom:http.Y/ ..ppsorglrefmnca#iiedpiacekad
20. RECREATIONAL SPACES. How well does the project incorporate facilities and access to
variety of recreational opportunities for all users?
RATIONALE:
Having accessible recreation, exercise, or sports facilities in neighborhoods tends to be associated
with active recreation. Additionally, research has shown that children are more physically active in
preschools that have more available playground equipment and a larger space for outdoor play.
CRITERIA:
Review the project for the following features:
Sports fields, courts, swimming pools, totlots, putting green, recreational gardening and
fitness facilities, including:
o Baseball or softball diamonds, soccer fields, an open p/aygreen, a skate park,
basketball, tennis, sand volleyball, and/orpractice fields," or
o Swimming pools, which may include an adult lap poo/and spa, a children'; pool a
splash park," or
o Equestrian staging area (if appropriate to the context).
Parks thatemphasize open space and natura/habitat, have minima/development and are
well distributed throughout the site. Park amenities may include:
Community Cohesion I Page 21
Page 155
o Openlawns
o Restrooms
o Shade structures
o Picnicareas
o Interpretive areas and interpretive signage
Park facilities for users of all ages with different recreational needs, interests and abilities.
Seniors and onyyoung children in particular have unique needs Considerthe following
age -specific park infrastructure:
o Veryyoung children (age 0-6J. toilets, splash pads
o Olderchildren (6-18). sports fields, courts skate park
o Adults: sports fields, puttinggreen, gardening and fitness facilities, adultlap pool
o Senoor(age60+)gardeningandfitnessfacilities,adultlappool,trails
EVIDENCE:
BaenstoAF.,andF..0 Bud. Envimnmenta/Conoststes ofPbysica/Acwlty and Walking in Aduksand Chid n: AReview of
the Reviews. London: NaBova//nstthde of/Leakh and avaica/LaceO nce. Retrieved hom:
http.// .nice.orguk/nicemeda/pdHfdlenvimnmenl IW20cone/ates5g20 M2059physica/%arnYity%20 view.pdf
Hamik, P. and B. We//e.201 L Fmm Rfies Zones b the Medca/Mte: How Urban Palk Systems Gn Be Pmmow Health
and We//ness.T sth blicland Re Mevedhom.https.// .tpl.orglsite defauk&ley/oudtpLor 1puh�crhea/th
promobngparks-gel df
Uinch R Evidence BasedEnvimnmenGlL sign forlmpmving Medical Ouk es. Rin ie ini from: httpl/muhc-
fai%ng mcgiiLra/enghah/peakeuAln'cht ohhn/
21. COMMUNITY SPACES. How well does the project incorporate facilities and access to a multi-
purpose community space accessible to the public?
RATIONALE:
Adaptable, multi -purpose community rooms can help foster sense of social cohesion and offer
space for education and health related programming. Education and lifelong learning can improve
social well-being and help maintain cognitive function as people age.
CRITERIA:
Review the project for the following features:
• Atleast one community space in every community and/or neighborhood; and
• Community room with multi use spaces, including recreational rooms, auditoriums,
outdoorplazas, andgreen building features, and
• Integration of community rooms with parks, open space facilities, and cultural centers.
EVIDENCE:
American Society oftandscape Anshitec4. 2014. Health Benefits of hasten. "ProlveionalPacbce. Rem'eved love
http.//www.as/a.org1hiaRhbenefitaveashere px
Etler T. andE McMahon, T. Throng. 2011 Ten Principles for Building Healthy Places. Washington DC: Urban land
Institute.
Community Cohesion I Page 22
Page 156
22. GROCERY. How well does the project integrate access to a full -service grocery store (e.g., sells
meat, dairy, fruits and vegetables) within reasonable walking distance of all residents?
RATIONALE:
Residents of communities with access to healthy foods have healthier diets. Proximity to
supermarkets is associated with lower rates of obesity and the presence of convenience stores is
associated with higher rates of obesity.
CRITERIA:
Review the project for the following features.
• A neighborhood market within the project design, or
• A public, multiuse space thata/tows for food markets, or
• Access to a full -service grocerystore within reasonable walking distance.
EVIDENCE
SilSs, d.,andKamn Glarn.209. PhysolAa iry and Food Environments Soloeonsur the Obesity Epidemic'M76ank
Quadedy. 67llk 12&154.
Wakefield, d. 2(8ht. Rghtng Obesity Through theBu)kEv)mnment-EnvimnmentalHealtbPep c ves 112(11): Abl6
A618.
23. COMMUNITY GARDEN. How well does the project incorporate space for growing food onsite
through community gardens, edible landscaping, or small scale farming within a reasonable
walking distance from residential development?
RATIONALE:
Community gardens provide a whole host of community benefits in addition to serving as an
additional source of healthy food. Participation in community gardening is associated with higher
fruit and vegetable intake, though, and can bean effective strategy at improving access to healthy
foods.
CRITERIA:
Review the project for the following features.
• Communhygardens in neighborhoodparks and residentoddevelopment aspartof
project design, or
• Jointuseagreements with localschool districts orotheren dies (if necessary to ensure
access to a schoolgarden); or
• Access to a communhygarden within reasonable walking distance.
EVIDENCE:
6tler, ThomasW F.r.McMehon, and TG7hoeht2013. Ten Pnn pleshu8uading Heakby P1 es Washington, D.C.:
Urban Lendl5owtur.
Lovell, 52010.5Nuldinceonalurbenagricukum lorsuahievible land aeop/ ningin the UnkodShises."Sustahvdviiry2(S).
2499-2522.
Access to Food, Jobs, and Services I Page 23
Page 157
24. FARMER'S MARKET. How well does the project designate space or provide access to a farmers
market within reasonable walking distance?
RATIONALE:
Proximity to farmer's markets has been found to be associated with lower body mass index (BMI)
among youth, while density of fast-food and pizza venues has been found to be associated with
higher BMI.
CRITERIA:
Review the project for the following features:
• Space included fora farmers market withinprojectdesign,or
• Access ensured to a farmers market within reasonable walking distance.
EVIDENCE:
d/cott S B., and S Wade, J.T. McGuir,, Q Wu, S. Lazonck, J.B. Moore. 2011, The assodistim between the End
envimnmentandweightsbN amongeastm North GmOnayoufh. Public Health Nutrition 14(09): 161ILMIZ
LeadershipforH lth Communities200ZAction Sbatgies Toolkit Washington,D.C.:Robert Wood✓ohnsm Foundation.
25. HEALTHY FOOD. How well does the project maintain a balance of healthy and unhealthy food
retailers?
RATIONALE:
Peoples' food choices and their likelihood of being overweight or obese are also influenced by
their food environment. A popular measure of healthy and less healthy food availability in a given
geographic area -including distance to food retailers, cost of foods, or density of food outlets- is
the modified Retail Environment Food Index (mREFI),which is a ratio of fast-food restaurants and
convenience stores compared to supermarkets, produce markets, and farmer's markets. Presence
of fastfood retailers has a negative effect on diets and diet related health outcomes.
CRITERIA:
Review the project for the following features:
Restnct fast food retailers within !4 mile of schmils, and
Manage the allowance of fastibodrelaters relative to the ratio of healthy food retailers to
unhealthyfoodretailers. This could be accomplishedbyutilizing the Modified Retail
Environment Food Index Score. Calculate the mREF1,, which is calculated fora census tract
as (healthy retailers)/(healthy retailers + unhealthy retailers). Areas with a score of less
than 5are considered to have "pooraccess to healthy retail food, scores of5to 10 to have
Yairaccess,"scores above 10 to 25to have good access,"andscoms above 25 to have
highaccess."
EVIDENCE:
CentrstrDeoe eConted/.2011."Census Tr LeveiState MapsofMe Mod"fled Re iiF dEvimnmentlndex(mRFl/
Removed 6om: ffp.✓lWp.cdcgovlpublP Mica ms/dnpao/census-baR-levelsiat- maps -mom i_TAG5011pdf
Moore LVandAVDie Rou ANetetn,DR ✓acobs,MFranco.2W9. Fart-foodconsumpbon, dietquality, and
neighboriecdenposure to fastf d: the muN ethnics2dy ofaehemsdemsis'Amencan.buindrdEpidemiolcyy 170(p:
2936.
Access to Food, Jobs, and Services I Page 24
Page 158
26. JOBS. How well does the project design promote shorter commutes and better access to jobs?
RATIONALE:
Jobs -housing balance is an indirect method of estimating how much commuting future residents
of the proposed community might have to endure. While some may find driving enjoyable,
commuting is generally a stressful activity that affects one's health and one's social ties to their
community. Extended commutes increase stress, with implications for both mental health and
familial relationships.
CRITERIA:
Review the projectfor the following features:
• Design includes more housing nearjob-centeramas,or
• Includesjobs nearhousing-dense areas or
• Includesallordable housing betweenjob centeramax.or
• Creates mixed use projects that include jobs and housing.
EVIDENCE:
C hfinmw Waning Roundtable. 2008. Deconsb ng ✓obs-Housing8lance."RoMovedfiom:
thin✓/ .cpmundbble.onilm edit ploads/pub_8los/ I?✓ohs-Housing Put
Eiank, LDandW Andmsen, TL 5chmid.2004. Obesry Relationships with Community Design, Pfi siodActwhx,, and Time
5pentin Gr American ✓oumalofPmvenbve Med"tine2D(2): 8796.
T mao,Lance.2002'rho ERects otSpmwion Neighborhood5ociai Tier An 6plarmkuyAnaiysis. ✓oumaiofthe
American PianningA ociabm67(1):6977.
Kosiowsky,M. andA Kluger, M.Reich. IW5. Commu(ingshes: causes,ohkuc ,andmethodsofcoping. New York: Plenum
Peso.
27. HEALTH SERVICES. How well does the project provide future residents with access to health
services?
RATIONALE:
The inability to access public transit poses a significant barrier for low-income patients to access
health care services and can result in missed appointments, avoiding care, and deterioration of
health conditions. One method to bridging the gaps in healthcare is by creating clinical -
community partnerships, which can be more cost effective and culturally appropriate in addressing
preventive care and population health.
CRITERIA:
Review the project for the following features:
• Access to a clinic orhealth facility within reasonable walking distance, or
• Include multi -use spaces thatcould be usedas a health centerorto provide health
services within the project design.
EVIDENCE:
Acme DYingbyDesign. C%n)rtL mmunity CollaboraeonC o&ies. Removedfiwn:
http./lac veGvingbydesign.oig sources/cfnicalmmmuniryvcollaboration-case-exampieV
Access to Food, Jobs, and Services I Page 25
Page 159
Hobson, ✓.and✓u%e Quir Maron 2W2.Rcadb/xksto Health h nsport6"on Bamies oHeakhy Comminhhes.
T spoi UonforH ltby Communities Collaboratie.Rebievedfiom:
http./Avww.banshurmca.ofglsites/def k/fi/ey db/ocks 0 health_2002pdf
28. CHILDCARE. How well does the project support increased access to affordable and high
quality childcare?
RATIONALE:
Access to quality childcare is vital to a child's early development and also contributes to important
economic benefits, including direct and indirectjob benefits, increased tax revenues, and a more
productive workforce. Communities, cities, and developers are finding unique ways to partner in
supporting child care facilities as part of development projects and land use plans.
CRITERIA:
Review the project for the following features.
• Mixed use development included as part ofpnliB:tdesign, or
• Design offlexible, multi use spaces that could be used as child care center,or
• Access to a child care center within reasonable walking distance.
EVIDENCE:
Hodgoin,K.2011. Child care and Sustainable Community Development (Amelicen P/amvngA ciiminF ity Fn"end/y
Communities Briefing Papers/Robevedfiom:https// .p/arming.oilmi archffemdy4bnefin,pa childcaie.hbn
Local/nvesttnentin Chid Gre(LINCC/. 2006. Building Chid Gre Into NewDeve%pments: A Guide ForC tlg Chid
G1aaTransitdevBAa d i.puy pments."Refi"eyed fiom: hftp.// . reconnx6ngamerica.o seW
Up/oads/200B0624%nccdevBRweb.pdf
PoliryLnkand the Marguerite Gsey Fbundabon.2016. High-Qualhy, Afford b/e Childcare forA//. Good forFamibes
CommuniUos,andthe Economy(/ ue BnefSees. TheE nom)cgnefitsofEquityJ.Retrievedhom.
http.Y/ ..po%q%nka,glsites/dekuk/R/es/Chi/dcare- A//-F/NAL-05-06-16.pdf
29. MIXED -USE. How well does the project integrate mixed -use development?
RATIONALE:
There are many different health and wellbeing benefits to living in a mixed -use area. Youths,
adults, and seniors residing in neighborhoods with mixed land use typically engage in more total
physical activity than those in single -use neighborhoods. Adults are more likely to walk if they live
in neighborhoods with high connectivity, high population density, and mixed land use.
Additionally, one primary characteristic of a high quality healthy community is mixed land use,
where residents live in proximity to services and amenities, rather than in purely residential
environments.
CRITERIA:
Review the project for the following features:
• Neighborhood- serving uses, such as food markets, libraries, dry cleaning services and
beauty salons within the projectdesign, and
• Retailand service uses on the ground Jloorto entice pedestrians.
Access to Food, Jobs, and Services I Page 26
Page 160
EVIDENCE:
Barton, H. and C. Tsourour.2001. Healthy Urban Planning. New York: RouBedge.
Elver, T. andE McMahon, T. Thomg. 2013. Ten Principles for Building Healthy Places. Washington DC: Urban land
Institute.
Frank LDandWAnd sen, HSchmid2004.Obesty Relationships with Community Design, Physica/ActaW and Time
5pentin Gr Amencan✓oumalofPmvenbve Medeine2z(2): 8796.
F mkiq H. sent. trick, R Jackson 2004. Urban SprawlandPubGc Health: Designing, Nanning andRuiMing&rHe ltby
Communities. Washington,O ..is/and Press.
30. MIXED -HOUSING. How well does the project contribute to a mix of housing options that will
allow all potential household sizes, incomes, and types to become neighbors and share
available amenities?
RATIONALE:
Offering housing that is affordable to local workers is crucial, as a mix of housing that meets a
diversity of needs and incomes allows diverse professionals to live in the community in which they
work. There are ample benefits to having housing that can accommodate local workers, including
increased social cohesiveness and a decrease in the amount of driving necessary to support a
community.
CRITERIA:
Review the projectfor the following features.
• An inclusionary housing requirement and
• Design ofmuldgenerationalhousing,and
• A wide range ofhousing fordiverse household sizes and types.
EVIDENCE:
Fraser,J. andR. Chaskin, ✓Bazuin. 2013. Making Mixed-inrome Neighborhoods WorkforLow-incame Households.
Gtysrape:AJoumalofPoliry DevelopmentandRese hIS(2J: 83-100.
Urban Landinsttde.2003.Mixedkecam Housing MythandFa&..Removedfrom:http:/Onclsione housing.ca/wp-
conwnWploads/s)f &s Ol0 I/Utl Mmod-Income-Hsg2003pdf
Access to Food, Jobs, and Services I Page 27
Page 161
Works Cited
Active Living by Design. Clinical -Community Collaboration Case Examples. Retrieved from:
http.//activelivingbydesign. org/resources/clinical-community-collaboration-case-examples/
American Association of State High way and Transportation Officials. 2011. A Policy on Geometric
Design of High ways and Streets. Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway and
Transportation Officials.
American Lung Association. (n.d). 'Healthy Air at Home. "Retrieved from: http.//www. lung. org/ our-
initiatives/healthy-air/indoor/at-home/
American Public Transportation Association. 2009. 'Defining Areas of Influence. "(Recommended
Practice). Retrieved from: http.//www.apta.com/resources/standards/Documents/APTA o20SUDS-
UD-RP-001-09. pdf
American Society of Landscape Architects. 2014. 'Health Benefits of Nature. "Professional Practice.
Retrieved from: http.//www.asla.org/healthbenefi'tsofnature.aspx
Barton, H. and C. Tsourour. 2001. Healthy Urban Planning. New York: Routledge.
Bauman, A. E., and F. C. Bull. Environmental Correlates of Physical Activity and Walking in Adults and
Children: A Review of the Reviews. London: National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence.
Retrieved from: http.//www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/pdf/word/environmental o20correlates o20of o
201ophysical%acti vity%20re vie w. pdf
Boarnet, MG, and CL Anderson, K. Day, T. McMillan, M. Alfonzo. 2005. Evaluation of the California
Safe Routes to School legislation: urban form changes and children's active transportation to
school. "American Journal of Preventive Medicine 28 (2): 134-40.
Boodlal, L. 2003. Accessible Sidewalks and Street Crossings - an informational guide. " US Department
of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. Retrieved from:
http://www.bikewaIk.org/pdfs/sopada_fhwa.pdf
Brophy, V. andJO Lewis. 2011. A Green Vitruvius. London: Earthscan.
California Department of Education. 2015. Sustainable Communities and School Planning. Retrieved
from: http.//www.cde.ca.gov/ls/fa/bp/documents/bestprcticesustain.pdf
California Planning Roundtable. 2008. 'Deconstructing Jobs -Housing Balance. "Retrieved from:
http.//www.cproundtable.org/media/uploads/pub files/CPR-Jobs-Housing.pdf
Center forActive Design. 2010. 'Active Design Guidelines: Promoting Physical Activity and Health In
Design. " City of New York.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2014. 'Health Effects of Cigarette Smoking. "Smoking and
Tobacco Use, Data and Statistics, Fact Sheets. Retrieved from: http.//www.cdc.gov/tobacco/
data-statistics/fact sheets/health-effects/effects cig smoking/
Centers for Disease Control. 2011. 'Census Tract Level State Maps of the Modified Retail Food
Environment Index (mRFEI). Retrievedfrom: ftp.//ftp.cdc.gov/pub/Publications/dnpao%ensus-
tract-level-state-maps-mrfei TAG508.pdf
ChangeLab Solutions. (n.d.) 'Pedestrian Friendly Code Directory: Eyes on the Street. "Retrieved from:
http.//www. changelabsolutions. org/childhood-obesity/eyes-street
Works Cited I Page 28
Page 162
Congress for New Urbanism. 2001. Ped Sheds. " Transportation Tech Sheet. Retrieved from:
http.//cnu.civicactions.net/sites/www.cnu.org/files/CNU Ped Sheds.pdf
Convergence Partnership. 2006. Healthy, Equitable Transportation Policy. Retrieved from:
http.//www.convergencepartnership.org/sites/default/files/healthtrans fullbook final.PDF
Eitler, Thomas W., E. T. McMahon, and T. C. Thoerig. 2013. Ten Principles for Building Healthy Places.
Washington, D. C.: Urban Land Institute.
Environmental Protection Agency. (n.d). "Improving Indoor Air Quality. "Retrieved from:
https.'//www. epa.go v/indoor-air-quality-iaq/improving-indoor-air-quality
Environmental Protection Agency. 2015. Near Roadway Air Pollution and Health. Retrieved from:
http.//www3. epa.gov/otaq/nearroadway. htm
Environmental Protection Agency. 2016. "Technical Guidance for Assessing Environmental Justice in
Regulatory Analysis. "Retrieved from: https.//www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2016-
06/documents/ejtg 5.6 16 v5.l.pdf
Forsyth, A. and L. Smead (Eds.). 2015. Mobility, Universal Design, Health, and Place (A Research Brief).
Health and Places Initiative. Retrieved from: http.//research.gsd.harvardedu/hapi/files/2015/
11/HAPI ResearchBrief UniversalDesign- I 12315.pdf
Frank, LD and MA Andresen, TL Schmid. 2004. 'Obesity Relationships with Community Design,
Physical Activity, and Time Spent in Cars. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 27(2): 87-96.
Frank L, Schmid T, Sallis J, Chapman J, Saelens B. 2005. "Linking objectively measured physical activity
with objectively measured urban form: findings from SMARTRAQ. "American Journal of Preventive
Medicine 28117--125.
Fraser, J. and R. Chaskin, J Bazuin. 2013. Making Mixed -Income Neighborhoods Work for Low -Income
Households. Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research 15(2).• 83-100.
Freeman, Lance. 2002. "The Effects of Sprawl on Neighborhood Social Ties: An Explanatory Analysis".
Journal of the American Planning Association 67(1).• 69-77.
Gotschi, T. 2011. 'Costs & Benefits of Bicycling Investments in Portland, Oregon. "Journal of Physical
Activity & Health 8(l).• 549-558.
Handy, S. L. 2004. Critical Assessment of the Literature on the Relationships among Transportation,
Land Use, and Physical Activity. Washington, DC.- Transportation Research board and Institutes of
Medicine Committee on PhysicalActivity, Health Transportation, and Land Use.
Harnik, P. and B. Welle. 2011. From Fitness Zones to the Medical Mile: How Urban Park Systems Can
Best Promote Health and Wellness. Trust for Public Land Retrieved from:
https.•//www. tpl. org/sites/default/files/cloud. tpl, org/pubs/ccpe-health-promoting-parks-rpt. pdf
Hobson, J, and Julie Quiroz-Martinez. 2002. Roadblocks to Health: Transportation Barriers to Healthy
Communities. Transportation for Healthy Communities Collaborative. Retrieved from:
http.//www.transformca.org/sites/default/files/roadblocks to health 2002.pdf
Hodgson, K. 2011. Child care and Sustainable Community Development. (American Planning
Association Family Friendly Communities Briefing Papers). Retrieved from:
https.//www. planning. org/ research/family/briefi'ngpapers/childcare. htm
Works Cited I Page 29
Page163
IESNA Security Lighting Committee. 2003. 'Guideline for Security Lighting for People, Property, and
Public Spaces. "New York: Illuminating Engineering Society ofAmerica.
Jilcott, S. B., and S. Wade, J. T. McGuirt, Q. Wu, S. Lazorick, J.B. Moore. 2011. The association between
the food environment and weight status among eastern North Carolina youth. Public Health
Nutrition 14(09): 1610-1617.
Kaczynski, A. and K. Henderson. 2007. 'Environmental correlates ofphysical activity a review of
evidence about parks and recreation. "Leisure Sciences 29(4): 315-354.
Klingerman M. and J. Sallis, S. Ryan, L. Frank, P. Nader. 2007. 'Association of neighborhood design
and recreation environment variables with physical activity and body mass index in adolescents. "
American Journal of Health Promotion 21(4): 274-77.
Koepsel% T. 2002. "Crosswalk markings and the risk of pedestrian -motor vehicle collisions in older
pedestrians. " The Journal of the American Medical Association 288 (17): 2136-2143.
Koslowsky, M. and A. Kluger, M. Reich. 1995. Commuting stress: causes, effects, and methods of
coping. New York: Plenum Press.
Kryter, K. 1994. The Handbook of Hearing and the Effects of Noise: Physiology, Psychology, and Public
Health. San Diego: Academic Press.
Leadership for Health Communities. 2007. Action Strategies Toolkit. Washington, D.C.: Robert Wood
Johnson Foundation.
Litman, T. 2010. 'Evaluating Public Transportation Health Benefits. "American Public Transportation
Association. Retrieved from: http.//www.apta.com/resources/reportsandpublications/Documents/
APTA- Health- Benefits Litman.pdf
Local Investment in Child Care (LINCC). 2008. 'Building Child Care Into New Developments: A Guide
For Creating Child Care Facilities In Transit -Oriented Developments. "Retrieved from: http.•//www.
reconnectingamerica. org/assets/ Uploads/20080624Iinccde vBRweb. pdf
Louv, Richard. 2008. Last Child in the Woods. New York: Algonquin Books.
Lovell, S. 2010. 'Multifunctional urban agriculture for sustainable land use planning in the United
States. "Sustainability 2(8).• 2499-2522.
Lund, Hollie. 2002. "Pedestrian Environments and Sense of Community. "Journal of Planning
Education and Research. 21(3).• 301-312.
Moore L V and A V Diez Roux, JA Nettleton, DR Jacobs, M Franco. 2009. "Fast-food consumption, diet
quality, and neighborhood exposure to fast food- the multi -ethnic study of atherosclerosis. "
American Journal of Epidemiology 170 (1).• 29-36.
Mouzon, S. 2012. "Walk Appeal. "Better Cities and Towns. Retrieved from: http.//bettercities.net/news-
opinion/blogs/ste ve-mouzon/18645/walk-appeal
National Association of City Transportation Officials. Urban Street Design Guide. Washington, DC -
Island Press.
National Center for Environmental Health. 2013. Parks and Trails Health Impact Assessment. Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention. Retrieved from:
https.•//www.cdc.gov/healthyplaces/parks trails/sectionc.htm#1
Works Cited I Page 30
Page 164
National Center for Safe Routes to School. 2015. Creating Healthier Generations: A Look at the 10
Years of the Federal Safe Routes to School Program. Retrieved from:
http.//saferoutesinfo.org/sites/default/files/SRTS 10YearReport Finalpdf
Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. (n.d.) 'Environmental Health. "Healthy People
2020. Retrieved from: https.//www. healthypeople.gov/2020/topics-
objecti ves/topic%n viron m en tal-h ealth
Painter, K. 1996. "The Influence of Street Lighting Improvements on Crime, Fear, and Pedestrian Street
Use, after dark. "Landscape and Urban Planning 35(2-3): 193-201.
PolicyLink and the Marguerite Casey Foundation. 2016. High -Quality, Affordable Childcare forAlk
Good for Families, Communities, and the Economy. (Issue Brief Series: The Economic Benefits of
Equity). Retrieved from: http://www.policylinkorg/sites/default/files/Childcare-for-All-FINAL-05-06-
16. pdf
Project for Public Spaces. 2009. Why Public Spaces Fail. Retrieved from: http.//www. pps. org/
reference/failedplacefeat/
Pucher J, and J. Dill, and S. Handy. 2010. "Infrastructure, programs, and policies to increase bicycling:
an international review. " Preventive Medicine 50: 106-25.
Retting, R. A., and A. T. McCartt, S. A. Ferguson. 2003. 'A review of evidence -based traffic engineering
measures designed to reduce pedestrian -motor vehicle crashes. "American Journal of Public
Health 93(9),• 1456-1462.
Sacramento Transportation and Air Quality Collaborative. 'Best Practices for Complete Streets. "
Retrieved from: https.•//www.smartgrowthamerica.org/app/legacy/documents/cs/resources/cs-
bestpractices-Sacramento. pdf
Sallis, J.,and Karen Glanz. 2009. "PhysicalActivity and Food Environments: Solutions to the Obesity
Epidemic. " Milbank Quarterly. 87 (1).• 123-154.
Scott M., and D. Cohen, K. Evenson, J. Elder, D. Catellier, JSAsh wood, A. Overton. 2007 "Weekend
Schoolyard Accessibility, Physical Activity, and Obesity The Trial ofActivity in Adolescent Girls
(TAAG) Study. "Preventive Medicine (44), 398-403.
Shulaker, B. and J. Isacoff, T. Kjer, and K. Hart. 2016. Park Design for Physical Activity and Health. San
Francisco: Trust for Public Land.
Speck, J. 2012. Walkable City: How Downtown can Save America, One Step at a Time. New York:
North Point Press.
Srinivasan, S. and L. O Fallon, A. Dearry. 2003. 'Creating Healthy Communities, Healthy Homes,
Healthy People: Initiating a Research Agenda on the Built Environment and Public Health. "
American Journal of Public Health 93(9): 1446-1450.
Stangl, P. 2015. 'Block size -based measures of street connectivity A Critical Assessment and new
approach." Urban Design International20(1),• 1-12.
Trust for Public Land 2016. 'Parks on the Clock: Why we Believe in the 10-minute walk. "Retrieved
from: https.•//www.tpl.org/blog/why-the-l0-minute-walk#sm.0001bo0t0r4t1d50von1fn8ldyt18
Ulrich, R. Evidence Based Environmental Design for Improving Medical Outcomes. Retrieved from:
http.//muhc-healing.mcgill.ca/english/Speakers/ulrich p.html
Works Cited I Page 31
Page165
Urban Land Institute. 2003. Mixed Income Housing, Myth and Fact. Retrieved from:
http.//inclusionaryhousing. ca/wp-contentluploads/sitesl2l2O 10/0l/UL/-Mixed-Income-Hsg-
2003. pdf
U.S. Green Building Council. 2016. LEED v4 for Neighborhood Development. Retrieved from:
http.//www. usgbc. org/resources/leed-v4-neighborhood-development-current- version
U.S. Green Building Council. (n.d.) LEED BD+C.• Schools. Access to Quality Transit. Retrieved from:
http.//www. usgbc. org/credits/schools-new-construction/v4-draft/Itc5
Wakefield, J. 2004. Fighting Obesity Through the Built Environment. "Environmental Health
Perspectives 112(11): A616-A618.
Wekerly, G. 2000. From Eyes on the Street to Safe Cities. "Places 13(1).• 44-49.
Westrup, L. 2002. 'Quimby Act 101: An Abbreviated Overview. "California Department of Parks and
Recreation. Retrieved from: https://www.parks.ca.gov/pages/795/files/quimbyl0l.pdf
Zegeer, C. 2001. 'Safety effects of marked versus unmarked crosswalks at uncontrolled locations. "
Transportation Research Record (1773): 56-68.
Works Cited I Page 32
Page166
05/19/2021- CITY COUNCIL MEETING - ITEM H1 - ADDITIONAL CORRESPONDENCE
From: Jonathan Shardlow <Jonathan.Shardlow@GreshamSavage.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2021 11:51 AM
To: City Council <CityCouncil@citvofrc.us>; City Clerk <City.Clerk@citvofrc.us>; McPherson, Sean
<Sean.McPherson @citvofrc.us>
Subject: Comments on City Council Agenda Item H1- Consideration Whether to Appeal the Action of the Planning
Commission in Approving Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20164, Minor Design Review DRC2020-00138, and Conditional
Use Permit DRC2020-00087.
CAUTION: This email is from outside our Corporate network. Do not click links or open attachments unless you
recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Honorable Mayor and Councilmembers and Planner Sean McPherson,
Please accept these comments on tonight's item (Item No. H1).
We do not believe an appeal is necessary given that the project was designed to be consistent
with the Healthy Development Checklist as well as applicable Healthy RC standards. To be
clear, the proposal is not a normal 7-Eleven, but one its new "lab" stores which includes a wide
array of fresh and healthy options, which also includes a made -to -order Mexican restaurant with
fresh and healthy offerings.
Per the May 12, 2021 Planning Commission Staff Report, "the areas within the proposed
convenience store which were previously dedicated to alcohol sales have now been replaced
with [additional] fresh food areas." In this regard, in approving the Project, the Planning
Commission found that "[t]he proposed use is allowed within the applicable zoning district and
complies with all other applicable provisions of this zoning code, Municipal Code, general plan,
and any applicable specific plans or city regulations/standards (Development Code
17.16.120.D.1)" Specifically, the facts supporting this finding, in part, state: "As the project
now proposes to expand fresh food and grocery items, staff feels that the project meets the
intent of General Plan Land Use Goal LU-6, which provides that the City "Promote the stability
of southwest Rancho Cucamonga residential neighborhoods," while Policy LU-6.1 elaborates
by stating that the City shall continue to encourage commercial and community services that
meet community needs." Southwest Rancho Cucamonga generally lacks options for fresh foods
and grocery amenities. As the project has now been revised to eliminate alcohol sales and
1
expand fresh food sales, the project meets the intent of both General Plan Goal LU-6 as well as
Policy LU-6.1.
Of note, 7-Eleven is shedding its identity as a junk food staple. The chain wants to figure out
how to change customers' perceptions that convenience food doesn't always have to be deep-
fried or nutritionally sketchy. In early March 2019, the chain debuted its first "lab store," in
Texas, a real-time testing ground for healthy conveniences. Outside, the store looks largely like
any other 7-Eleven, with the familiar signage and gas pumps — inside, it looks a lot like a
Whole Foods or any other sleek modern grocer, with natural wood accents and towers of trail
mix ingredients sold in bulk.
The 7-11 Lab Stores have been summarized as follows:
Unlike most other 7-Eleven stores, this outpost offers a range of
hot and prepared food items that goes far beyond the typical
roller -grill hot dogs that have been the chain's bread and butter
for decades. Right next to the roller grill sit warmers full of
soups like vegetarian tomato basil and gluten -free chili. Across
the aisle awaits what press releases call the "better for you"
refrigerator case, filled with grab -and -go lunch items:
sandwiches, salads, and plastic bowls filled with a "seasonal
blend" of mushy kiwi, grapes, cantaloupe, strawberries, and a
single pineapple spear. Thanks to the current dominance of the
keto trend, hard boiled eggs; portion -controlled packets of
cured meats; cheeses; and cured meats wrapped around cheeses
are abundant.... In the aisles, this 7-Eleven is stocked with
enough gluten -free, paleo, vegan, organic, and naturally
sweetened options to feed an entire army of wellness -obsessed
snackers, with just enough "normal" food to resemble a small
grocery
store.LU (https://www.eater.com/2019/3/22/18277582/7-eleven-
healthy-food-organic-slurpees-lab-store)
Notwithstanding our prior demonstration to healthy offerings, our office has taken the liberty to
compare the project to the Healthy Development Checklist and prepare notes on the project's
consistency with the checklist and healthy vision. (attached). We have also attached a few
snippets of offerings by 7-Eleven and Laredo Tacos from some the few Lab stores that exist
today and have included many of the relevant slides provided to the Planning Commission
which provide additional detail on the project. This will be one of the first 7-Eleven Lab Store
in California. As I believe you will see from reviewing the attached items, you will conclude
this project is anything but the normal 7-Eleven stores that exist throughout the City
today. City Staff clearly communicated high standards for the project and 7-Eleven is ready to
deliver on a truly state of -the art unique and modern offering for southwest Rancho
Cucamonga.
z
Thank you for your consideration.
Jon
From: Jonathan Shardlow
Sent: Monday, May 17, 2021 4:41 PM
To: 'McPherson, Sean'; Grant Ross
Subject: RE: Council Meeting
Thank you Sean. Will the applicant team be given an opportunity to comment? We certainly wish to highlight the fresh
and healthy offerings that would be offered by both the 7-Eleven and Laredo Taco.
Jon
From: McPherson, Sean[mailto:Sean. McPhersonCcbcityofrc.us]
Sent: Monday, May 17, 2021 4:27 PM
To: Jonathan Shardlow; Grant Ross
Subject: Council Meeting
Grant and Jon,
Please follow the link below to access the City Council agenda for this coming Wednesday, May 19. The Council will be
considering whether or not to appeal the Planning Commission's approval of your project. Reference Item H.1 on the
agenda:
https://ranchocucamonga.primegov.com/Portal/Meeting?compiled MeetingDocumentFileld=3458
Please let me know of any questions.
Thanks,
Sean McPherson, AICP
Senior Planner
Planning Department
City of Rancho Cucamonga
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
909-774-4307
tit https://www.cater.com/2019/3/22/18277582/7-eleven-healthy-food-organic-slurpees-lab-store
Jonathan Shardlow
Shareholder
Gresham Savage Nolan & Tilden, PC
550 East Hospitality Lane, Suite 300
San Bernardino, CA 92408
3
Office: (9U9)89O-4499Ext. 1770
Fax: (909)890-9877
1.PriviUeged and Confidential Communication. The information contained in this email and any
attachments may be confidential or subject to the attorney client privilege orattorney work product
doctrine. If you are not the intended recipient of this communication, you may not use, disclose, print,
copy or disseminate the same. If you have received this in error, please notify the sender and destroy all
copies ofthis message.
2. Notice reTax Advice. Any tax advice contained in this email, including any attachments, is not
intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, by you or any other recipient for the purpose of (a)
avoiding penalties that may otherwise be imposed bythe IRS, or(b) supporting, promoting, marketing, or
recommending any transaction or matter to any third party.
3. Transmission of Viruses. Although this communication, and any attached documents or files, are
believed to be free of any virus or other defect, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is
virus free, and the sender does not accept any responsibility for any loss or damage arising in any way
from its use.
4. Security of Email. Electronic mail is sent over the public internet and may not be secure. Thus, we
cannot guarantee the privacy or confidentiality of such information.
�