Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2021/09/15 - Regular Meeting Agenda PacketMayor L. Dennis Michael Mayor Pro Tem Lynne B. Kennedy Members of the City Council: Ryan A. Hutchison Kristine D. Scott Sam Spagnolo CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REGULAR MEETING AGENDA September 15, 2021 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730  FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARD – CITY COUNCIL HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY­ SUCCESSOR AGENCY – PUBLIC FINANCE AUTHORITY CLOSED SESSION TRI­COMMUNITIES ROOM 4:30 P.M. REGULAR MEETINGS        COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 P.M. The City Council meets regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive.  It Is the Intent to conclude the meeting by 10:00 p.m. unless extended by the concurrence of the City Council.  Agendas, minutes, and recordings of meetings can be found at www.cityofrc.us or by contacting the City Clerk's Office at 909­774­2023. Live Broadcast available on Channel 3 (RCTV ­3). CLOSED SESSION – 4:30 P.M.   TRI­COMMUNITIES ROOM  ROLL CALL: Mayor Michael  Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy  Council Members Hutchison, Scott, and Spagnolo  A. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) C. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS D. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION D1.CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR ROBERT NEIUBER, HUMAN RESOURCES DIRECTOR PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54954.2 REGARDING LABOR NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION (RCCEA), TEAMSTERS LOCAL 1932, RANCHO CUCAMONGA MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT GROUP, RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIREFIGHTERS LOCAL 2274, FIRE SUPPORT SERVICES AND FIRE MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES GROUP – (CITY/FIRE) D2.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (1) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: HIMNEL USA, INC. d/b/a ST. MARY'S MONTESSORI SCHOOL AND GLOBAL PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLC VS. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, SBSC CASE NO.: CIVDS 2014554. – (CITY) D3.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (1) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: PEPE’S INC. V. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, CASE NO. 5:20CV02506JGBSP – (CITY) D4.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 12467 BASE LINE ROAD IDENTIFIED AS PARCEL NUMBERS 1090331030000, 1090331040000, 1089581040000; NEGOTIATING PARTIES JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND JOSEPH FILIPPI, JOSEPH FILIPPI WINERY AND VINEYARDS; REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS. – (CITY) D5.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF THE SAN SEVAINE CHANNEL, PARALLEL TO TORREY PINE COURT, FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBER 0228­044­24; NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND CHAO PING YANG, PROPERTY OWNER, REGARDING A PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR MULTI­USE PATH PURPOSES. – CITY D6.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL ­ ANTICIPATED LITIGATION: INITIATION OF LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9: 1 CASE INVOLVING RJM DESIGN GROUP, TOVEY­SCHULTZ CONSTRUCTION, INC., AND OTHER PARTIES ARISING OUT OF ALLEGED DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION DEFECTS AT THE RC SPORTS CENTER – CITY D7.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8783 ETIWANDA AVENUE/12949 WHITTRAM AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229­162­14; NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER,  AND OVERLAND, PACIFIC AND CUTLER, REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND KULAR TRUCK LINE, INC., OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE.  NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – CITY D8.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 9333 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229­162­23; NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER,  AND OVERLAND, PACIFIC AND CUTLER, REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON, OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE.  NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – CITY D9.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8949 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229­162­22; NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER,  AND OVERLAND, PACIFIC AND CUTLER, REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON, OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE.  NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – CITY E. RECESS – Closed Session to Recess to the Regular City Council Meeting at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers at City Hall, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. REGULAR MEETING – 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL:Mayor Michael Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy Council Members Hutchison, Scott, and Spagnolo A. AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDA B. ANNOUNCEMENT / PRESENTATIONS B1.Presentation of Certificate of Recognition Recognizing Delaney Spaulding, Team USA Softball Olympian and Rancho Cucamonga Resident. B2.Presentation of Proclamations of Recognition to Library Board of Trustees Members Luella G. Hairston, Esq. and Mary Hannah, and Library Foundation Director Heidi Soehnel for Their Service to the Rancho Cucamonga Public Library.  B3.Presentation of a Proclamation Proclaiming the Month of September as Suicide Prevention Month. C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS Members of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, and Public Finance Authority. This is the time and place for the general public to address the Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Council on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Mayor, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Fire Board, Agencies, Successor Agency, Authority Board, or City Council not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of the business portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topic contained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for these business items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of the agenda commences. Any other public communications which have not concluded during this one hour period may resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed. CONSENT CALENDARS: The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and noncontroversial. They will be acted upon without discussion unless an item is removed by Council Member for discussion. Members of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, and Public Finance Authority and may act on the consent calendar for those bodies as part of a single motion with the City Council consent calendar. D. CONSENT CALENDAR D1.Consideration of Meeting Minutes for the Regular Meetings of July 21, 2021 and Special Meeting of September 1, 2021. D2.Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Bi­Weekly Payroll in the Total Amount of $1,834,980.73 and City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers (Excluding Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company) in the Total Amount of $6,633,672.06 Dated August 23, 2021 Through September 06, 2021. (CITY/FIRE) ​ D3.Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers for Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company in the Total Amount of $677,663.21 Dated August 23, 2021 Through September 06, 2021. (CITY/FIRE) D4.Consideration of Reimbursement for the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Master Plan Drainage Improvements Program for Fiscal Year 2020/2021 and an Appropriation of $5,394 from the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Drainage Fund (Fund 116). (CITY) D5.Consideration to Approve an Amendment to a Special Services Agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Liebert Cassidy Whitmore, a Professional Law Corporation. (CITY) D6.Consideration of a Professional Services Agreement with Dapeer Rosenblit Litvak, LLP for Legal Services Related to the Municipal Code and Other Civil Matters. (CITY) D7.Consideration of an Improvement Agreement Extension for Case No. DRC2018­00430, Located East of Vineyard Avenue North of 8th Street, Submitted by Richard Collins Jr. (CITY) D8.Consideration to Accept as Complete, File a Notice of Completion, and Authorize Release of Retention, and Bonds for the School Crosswalk Improvements Project, Contract No. 2021­054. (CITY) D9.Consideration to Accept as Complete, File the Notice of Completion and Authorize Release of Retention and Bonds for the Hellman Avenue Sidewalk Improvements and ADA Ramps at Various Locations, Contract No. 2021­053. (CITY) D10.Consideration to Accept Public Improvements Located in the Village Commercial (VC) District of the Victoria Planned Community, South of Attwood Court and West of Victoria Park Lane, Related to Case No. DRC2017­00889, as Complete, File the Notice of Completion, and Authorize Release of Bonds. (CITY) D11.Consideration of a Resolution to Set Residential Bear Resistant Container Solid Waste Rate Within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021­099) (CITY) D12.Consideration of a Resolution Approving an Amendment to the Rancho Cucamonga City Employees Association Salary Schedule for Fiscal Year 2021­2022, Including the Addition of Supervising Traffic Systems Specialist Classification. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021­105) (CITY) D13.Consideration of the Improvement Agreement and Improvement Securities for Street Improvements, Order Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B, Street Light Maintenance Districts Nos. 1 and 6 for Case No. DRC2020­00026, Located at the Southwest Corner of 6th Street and Hyssop Drive. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021­101), (RESOLUTION NO. 2021­102), (RESOLUTION NO. 2021­103) (CITY) D14.Consideration of Resolutions of the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, Rancho Cucamonga, California, Amending Resolutions FD 2021­009, 2021­010, and 2021­011, and Approving Covenants and Restrictions for Real Property Pursuant to Government Code Section 54233.5. (RESOLUTION NOS. FD 2021­029, FD 2021­030 AND FD 2021­031) (FIRE) D15.Consideration to Adopt a Resolution Approving Side Letter Agreements between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and City Bargaining Units, Including a Part­Time City Employee Benefit. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021­104) (CITY) D16.Consideration to Adopt a Resolution Approving a Side Letter Agreement Between the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and Fire District Bargaining Units, Including a Part­Time Employee Benefit Update. (RESOLUTION NO. FD 2021­028). (FIRE) D17.Consideration of an Amendment to the Agreement for Professional Services with SMG­Rancho Cucamonga Premier Food Services LLC for Comprehensive Event and Meeting Sales, Management, Catering, and Concession Services for Certain Spaces at the Victoria Gardens Cultural Center and Lewis Family Playhouse. (CITY) D18.Consideration to Approve Amendment No. 001 to Contract No. 18­121 with KWall, LLC. for Additional Website Development. (CITY) E. CONSENT CALENDAR ORDINANCE(S) ­ SECOND READING/ADOPTION E1.Consideration of Second Reading and Adoption of the Following: Ordinance No.  983 An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, Adopting Municipal Code Amendment DRC2021­00281 to Amend Table 17.26.020­1, Section 17.30.030, Table 17.30.030­1, and Section 17.36.030 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to Establish Three New Zoning Districts and Adopt Associated Development Standards and Permitted Uses for Each New Zoning District, Adopting Zoning Map Amendment DRC2021­00283 to Rezone Certain Parcels as Set Forth Herein, Adopting an Addendum to the General Plan Program Environmental Impact Report Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, and Making Findings in Support Thereof Ordinance No.  984 An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, Approving Planned Community Amendment DRC2021­00284 to Amend the Terra Vista Planned Community to Rezone 13 Parcels to the New Urban Corridor Zoning District, Adopting an Addendum to the General Plan Program Environmental Impact Report Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, and Making Findings in Support Thereof Ordinance No.  985 An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, Adopting Planned Community Amendment DRC2021­00285 to Amend the Victoria Planned Community to Rezone Six Parcels Within the Specific Plan to the New Urban Center Zoning District, Adopting an Addendum to the General Plan Program Environmental Impact Report Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, and Making Findings in Support Thereof F. ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING ITEM(S) G. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM(S) ­ CITY/FIRE DISTRICT G1.8:00 P.M. TIME CERTAIN ­ PUBLIC HEARING #1 ­ Consideration of City Council Election District Boundaries, to Include Discussion Regarding the Redistricting Process, Review of Permissible Criteria to be Considered to Redraw City Council Election District Boundaries, and Receiving Public Input on Communities of Interest and Potential District Boundaries. (CITY) G2.Consideration to Approve the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program Year 2020­ 2021 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER). (CITY) G3.Consideration of a Resolution to Create a Residential Permit Parking District on Estacia Street, Elmhurst Avenue, Stafford Street, Dorset Court, Effen Street, and Cambridge Avenue Between Hermosa Avenue and Ramona Avenue Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 10.50. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021­100) (CITY) H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORT(S) H1.Consideration of a Resolution Proclaiming October 6, 2021, as California Clean Air Day. (RESOLUTION NO 2021­098) (CITY)   I. COUNCIL BUSINESS I1.Consideration of Santa Tour Activities for 2021. (CITY) I2.COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Council Member.) I3.INTER​AGENCY UPDATES (Update by the City Council to the community on the meetings that were attended.) J. CITY ATTORNEY ITEMS K. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING L. ADJOURNMENT CERTIFICATION I, Linda A. Troyan, MMC, City Clerk Services Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify under penalty of perjury that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on at least twenty​four (24) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California; 12505 Cultural Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA, 91739; and on the City's website.  LINDA A. TROYAN, MMC CITY CLERK SERVICES DIRECTOR If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's office at (909) 477­2700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired.  CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT “Our Vision is to build on our success as a world class community,to create an equitable,sustainable,and vibrant city,rich in opportunity for all to thrive.” Page 1 MayorL. Dennis MichaelMayor Pro TemLynne B. KennedyMembers of the CityCouncil:Ryan A. HutchisonKristine D. ScottSam Spagnolo CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGAREGULAR MEETING AGENDASeptember 15, 202110500 Civic Center DriveRancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARD – CITY COUNCILHOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY­ SUCCESSOR AGENCY – PUBLICFINANCE AUTHORITYCLOSED SESSION TRI­COMMUNITIES ROOM 4:30 P.M.REGULAR MEETINGS        COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 P.M.The City Council meets regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in theCouncil Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive.  It Is the Intent to conclude the meeting by 10:00p.m. unless extended by the concurrence of the City Council.  Agendas, minutes, and recordings ofmeetings can be found at www.cityofrc.us or by contacting the City Clerk's Office at 909­774­2023. LiveBroadcast available on Channel 3 (RCTV ­3).CLOSED SESSION – 4:30 P.M.  TRI­COMMUNITIES ROOM ROLL CALL: Mayor Michael                        Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy                        Council Members Hutchison, Scott, and Spagnolo A. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)C. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTSD. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSIOND1.CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR ROBERT NEIUBER, HUMAN RESOURCESDIRECTOR PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54954.2 REGARDING LABOR NEGOTIATIONSWITH THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION (RCCEA), TEAMSTERSLOCAL 1932, RANCHO CUCAMONGA MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT GROUP, RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIREFIGHTERS LOCAL 2274, FIRE SUPPORT SERVICES AND FIRE MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES GROUP – (CITY/FIRE) D2.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (1) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: HIMNEL USA, INC. d/b/a ST. MARY'S MONTESSORI SCHOOL AND GLOBAL PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLC VS. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, SBSC CASE NO.: CIVDS 2014554. – (CITY) D3.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (1) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: PEPE’S INC. V. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, CASE NO. 5:20CV02506JGBSP – (CITY) D4.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 12467 BASE LINE ROAD IDENTIFIED AS PARCEL NUMBERS 1090331030000, 1090331040000, 1089581040000; NEGOTIATING PARTIES JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND JOSEPH FILIPPI, JOSEPH FILIPPI WINERY AND VINEYARDS; REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS. – (CITY) D5.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF THE SAN SEVAINE CHANNEL, PARALLEL TO TORREY PINE COURT, FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBER 0228­044­24; NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND CHAO PING YANG, PROPERTY OWNER, REGARDING A PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR MULTI­USE PATH PURPOSES. – CITY D6.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL ­ ANTICIPATED LITIGATION: INITIATION OF LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9: 1 CASE INVOLVING RJM DESIGN GROUP, TOVEY­SCHULTZ CONSTRUCTION, INC., AND OTHER PARTIES ARISING OUT OF ALLEGED DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION DEFECTS AT THE RC SPORTS CENTER – CITY D7.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8783 ETIWANDA AVENUE/12949 WHITTRAM AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229­162­14; NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER,  AND OVERLAND, PACIFIC AND CUTLER, REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND KULAR TRUCK LINE, INC., OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE.  NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – CITY D8.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 9333 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229­162­23; NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER,  AND OVERLAND, PACIFIC AND CUTLER, REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON, OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE.  NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – CITY D9.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8949 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229­162­22; NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER,  AND OVERLAND, PACIFIC AND CUTLER, REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON, OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE.  NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – CITY E. RECESS – Closed Session to Recess to the Regular City Council Meeting at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers at City Hall, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. REGULAR MEETING – 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL:Mayor Michael Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy Council Members Hutchison, Scott, and Spagnolo A. AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDA B. ANNOUNCEMENT / PRESENTATIONS B1.Presentation of Certificate of Recognition Recognizing Delaney Spaulding, Team USA Softball Olympian and Rancho Cucamonga Resident. B2.Presentation of Proclamations of Recognition to Library Board of Trustees Members Luella G. Hairston, Esq. and Mary Hannah, and Library Foundation Director Heidi Soehnel for Their Service to the Rancho Cucamonga Public Library.  B3.Presentation of a Proclamation Proclaiming the Month of September as Suicide Prevention Month. C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS Members of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, and Public Finance Authority. This is the time and place for the general public to address the Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Council on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Mayor, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Fire Board, Agencies, Successor Agency, Authority Board, or City Council not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of the business portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topic contained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for these business items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of the agenda commences. Any other public communications which have not concluded during this one hour period may resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed. CONSENT CALENDARS: The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and noncontroversial. They will be acted upon without discussion unless an item is removed by Council Member for discussion. Members of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, and Public Finance Authority and may act on the consent calendar for those bodies as part of a single motion with the City Council consent calendar. D. CONSENT CALENDAR D1.Consideration of Meeting Minutes for the Regular Meetings of July 21, 2021 and Special Meeting of September 1, 2021. D2.Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Bi­Weekly Payroll in the Total Amount of $1,834,980.73 and City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers (Excluding Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company) in the Total Amount of $6,633,672.06 Dated August 23, 2021 Through September 06, 2021. (CITY/FIRE) ​ D3.Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers for Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company in the Total Amount of $677,663.21 Dated August 23, 2021 Through September 06, 2021. (CITY/FIRE) D4.Consideration of Reimbursement for the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Master Plan Drainage Improvements Program for Fiscal Year 2020/2021 and an Appropriation of $5,394 from the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Drainage Fund (Fund 116). (CITY) D5.Consideration to Approve an Amendment to a Special Services Agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Liebert Cassidy Whitmore, a Professional Law Corporation. (CITY) D6.Consideration of a Professional Services Agreement with Dapeer Rosenblit Litvak, LLP for Legal Services Related to the Municipal Code and Other Civil Matters. (CITY) D7.Consideration of an Improvement Agreement Extension for Case No. DRC2018­00430, Located East of Vineyard Avenue North of 8th Street, Submitted by Richard Collins Jr. (CITY) D8.Consideration to Accept as Complete, File a Notice of Completion, and Authorize Release of Retention, and Bonds for the School Crosswalk Improvements Project, Contract No. 2021­054. (CITY) D9.Consideration to Accept as Complete, File the Notice of Completion and Authorize Release of Retention and Bonds for the Hellman Avenue Sidewalk Improvements and ADA Ramps at Various Locations, Contract No. 2021­053. (CITY) D10.Consideration to Accept Public Improvements Located in the Village Commercial (VC) District of the Victoria Planned Community, South of Attwood Court and West of Victoria Park Lane, Related to Case No. DRC2017­00889, as Complete, File the Notice of Completion, and Authorize Release of Bonds. (CITY) D11.Consideration of a Resolution to Set Residential Bear Resistant Container Solid Waste Rate Within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021­099) (CITY) D12.Consideration of a Resolution Approving an Amendment to the Rancho Cucamonga City Employees Association Salary Schedule for Fiscal Year 2021­2022, Including the Addition of Supervising Traffic Systems Specialist Classification. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021­105) (CITY) D13.Consideration of the Improvement Agreement and Improvement Securities for Street Improvements, Order Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B, Street Light Maintenance Districts Nos. 1 and 6 for Case No. DRC2020­00026, Located at the Southwest Corner of 6th Street and Hyssop Drive. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021­101), (RESOLUTION NO. 2021­102), (RESOLUTION NO. 2021­103) (CITY) D14.Consideration of Resolutions of the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, Rancho Cucamonga, California, Amending Resolutions FD 2021­009, 2021­010, and 2021­011, and Approving Covenants and Restrictions for Real Property Pursuant to Government Code Section 54233.5. (RESOLUTION NOS. FD 2021­029, FD 2021­030 AND FD 2021­031) (FIRE) D15.Consideration to Adopt a Resolution Approving Side Letter Agreements between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and City Bargaining Units, Including a Part­Time City Employee Benefit. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021­104) (CITY) D16.Consideration to Adopt a Resolution Approving a Side Letter Agreement Between the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and Fire District Bargaining Units, Including a Part­Time Employee Benefit Update. (RESOLUTION NO. FD 2021­028). (FIRE) D17.Consideration of an Amendment to the Agreement for Professional Services with SMG­Rancho Cucamonga Premier Food Services LLC for Comprehensive Event and Meeting Sales, Management, Catering, and Concession Services for Certain Spaces at the Victoria Gardens Cultural Center and Lewis Family Playhouse. (CITY) D18.Consideration to Approve Amendment No. 001 to Contract No. 18­121 with KWall, LLC. for Additional Website Development. (CITY) E. CONSENT CALENDAR ORDINANCE(S) ­ SECOND READING/ADOPTION E1.Consideration of Second Reading and Adoption of the Following: Ordinance No.  983 An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, Adopting Municipal Code Amendment DRC2021­00281 to Amend Table 17.26.020­1, Section 17.30.030, Table 17.30.030­1, and Section 17.36.030 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to Establish Three New Zoning Districts and Adopt Associated Development Standards and Permitted Uses for Each New Zoning District, Adopting Zoning Map Amendment DRC2021­00283 to Rezone Certain Parcels as Set Forth Herein, Adopting an Addendum to the General Plan Program Environmental Impact Report Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, and Making Findings in Support Thereof Ordinance No.  984 An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, Approving Planned Community Amendment DRC2021­00284 to Amend the Terra Vista Planned Community to Rezone 13 Parcels to the New Urban Corridor Zoning District, Adopting an Addendum to the General Plan Program Environmental Impact Report Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, and Making Findings in Support Thereof Ordinance No.  985 An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, Adopting Planned Community Amendment DRC2021­00285 to Amend the Victoria Planned Community to Rezone Six Parcels Within the Specific Plan to the New Urban Center Zoning District, Adopting an Addendum to the General Plan Program Environmental Impact Report Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, and Making Findings in Support Thereof F. ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING ITEM(S) G. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM(S) ­ CITY/FIRE DISTRICT G1.8:00 P.M. TIME CERTAIN ­ PUBLIC HEARING #1 ­ Consideration of City Council Election District Boundaries, to Include Discussion Regarding the Redistricting Process, Review of Permissible Criteria to be Considered to Redraw City Council Election District Boundaries, and Receiving Public Input on Communities of Interest and Potential District Boundaries. (CITY) G2.Consideration to Approve the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program Year 2020­ 2021 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER). (CITY) G3.Consideration of a Resolution to Create a Residential Permit Parking District on Estacia Street, Elmhurst Avenue, Stafford Street, Dorset Court, Effen Street, and Cambridge Avenue Between Hermosa Avenue and Ramona Avenue Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 10.50. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021­100) (CITY) H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORT(S) H1.Consideration of a Resolution Proclaiming October 6, 2021, as California Clean Air Day. (RESOLUTION NO 2021­098) (CITY)   I. COUNCIL BUSINESS I1.Consideration of Santa Tour Activities for 2021. (CITY) I2.COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Council Member.) I3.INTER​AGENCY UPDATES (Update by the City Council to the community on the meetings that were attended.) J. CITY ATTORNEY ITEMS K. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING L. ADJOURNMENT CERTIFICATION I, Linda A. Troyan, MMC, City Clerk Services Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify under penalty of perjury that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on at least twenty​four (24) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California; 12505 Cultural Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA, 91739; and on the City's website.  LINDA A. TROYAN, MMC CITY CLERK SERVICES DIRECTOR If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's office at (909) 477­2700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired.  CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT “Our Vision is to build on our success as a world class community,to create an equitable,sustainable,and vibrant city,rich in opportunity for all to thrive.” Page 2 MayorL. Dennis MichaelMayor Pro TemLynne B. KennedyMembers of the CityCouncil:Ryan A. HutchisonKristine D. ScottSam Spagnolo CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGAREGULAR MEETING AGENDASeptember 15, 202110500 Civic Center DriveRancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARD – CITY COUNCILHOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY­ SUCCESSOR AGENCY – PUBLICFINANCE AUTHORITYCLOSED SESSION TRI­COMMUNITIES ROOM 4:30 P.M.REGULAR MEETINGS        COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 P.M.The City Council meets regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in theCouncil Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive.  It Is the Intent to conclude the meeting by 10:00p.m. unless extended by the concurrence of the City Council.  Agendas, minutes, and recordings ofmeetings can be found at www.cityofrc.us or by contacting the City Clerk's Office at 909­774­2023. LiveBroadcast available on Channel 3 (RCTV ­3).CLOSED SESSION – 4:30 P.M.  TRI­COMMUNITIES ROOM ROLL CALL: Mayor Michael                        Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy                        Council Members Hutchison, Scott, and Spagnolo A. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)C. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTSD. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSIOND1.CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR ROBERT NEIUBER, HUMAN RESOURCESDIRECTOR PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54954.2 REGARDING LABOR NEGOTIATIONSWITH THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION (RCCEA), TEAMSTERSLOCAL 1932, RANCHO CUCAMONGA MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENTGROUP, RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIREFIGHTERS LOCAL 2274, FIRE SUPPORT SERVICES ANDFIRE MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES GROUP – (CITY/FIRE)D2.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH(1)    OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: HIMNEL USA, INC. d/b/a ST.MARY'S MONTESSORI SCHOOL AND GLOBAL PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLC VS. CITY OFRANCHO CUCAMONGA, SBSC CASE NO.: CIVDS 2014554. – (CITY)D3.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH(1) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: PEPE’S INC. V. CITY OFRANCHO CUCAMONGA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, CENTRAL DISTRICT OFCALIFORNIA, CASE NO. 5:20CV02506JGBSP – (CITY)D4.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 12467 BASE LINE ROAD IDENTIFIED AS PARCELNUMBERS 1090331030000, 1090331040000, 1089581040000; NEGOTIATING PARTIES JOHNGILLISON, CITY MANAGER REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ANDJOSEPH FILIPPI, JOSEPH FILIPPI WINERY AND VINEYARDS; REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS.– (CITY)D5.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF THE SANSEVAINE CHANNEL, PARALLEL TO TORREY PINE COURT, FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS SANBERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBER 0228­044­24; NEGOTIATINGPARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHOCUCAMONGA, AND CHAO PING YANG, PROPERTY OWNER, REGARDING A PERMANENTEASEMENT FOR MULTI­USE PATH PURPOSES. – CITYD6.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL ­ ANTICIPATED LITIGATION: INITIATION OF LITIGATIONPURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.9: 1 CASE INVOLVING RJM DESIGN GROUP, TOVEY­SCHULTZ CONSTRUCTION, INC.,AND OTHER PARTIES ARISING OUT OF ALLEGED DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION DEFECTS ATTHE RC SPORTS CENTER – CITYD7.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8783 ETIWANDA AVENUE/12949 WHITTRAM AVENUE,FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER0229­162­14; NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER,  AND OVERLAND,PACIFIC AND CUTLER, REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND KULARTRUCK LINE, INC., OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNINGPRICE.  NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SETFORTH ABOVE. – CITYD8.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 9333 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED ASSAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229­162­23; NEGOTIATINGPARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER,  AND OVERLAND, PACIFIC AND CUTLER,REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON,OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE.  NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – CITY D9.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8949 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229­162­22; NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER,  AND OVERLAND, PACIFIC AND CUTLER, REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON, OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE.  NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – CITY E. RECESS – Closed Session to Recess to the Regular City Council Meeting at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers at City Hall, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. REGULAR MEETING – 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL:Mayor Michael Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy Council Members Hutchison, Scott, and Spagnolo A. AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDA B. ANNOUNCEMENT / PRESENTATIONS B1.Presentation of Certificate of Recognition Recognizing Delaney Spaulding, Team USA Softball Olympian and Rancho Cucamonga Resident. B2.Presentation of Proclamations of Recognition to Library Board of Trustees Members Luella G. Hairston, Esq. and Mary Hannah, and Library Foundation Director Heidi Soehnel for Their Service to the Rancho Cucamonga Public Library.  B3.Presentation of a Proclamation Proclaiming the Month of September as Suicide Prevention Month. C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS Members of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, and Public Finance Authority. This is the time and place for the general public to address the Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Council on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Mayor, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Fire Board, Agencies, Successor Agency, Authority Board, or City Council not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of the business portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topic contained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for these business items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of the agenda commences. Any other public communications which have not concluded during this one hour period may resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed. CONSENT CALENDARS: The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and noncontroversial. They will be acted upon without discussion unless an item is removed by Council Member for discussion. Members of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, and Public Finance Authority and may act on the consent calendar for those bodies as part of a single motion with the City Council consent calendar. D. CONSENT CALENDAR D1.Consideration of Meeting Minutes for the Regular Meetings of July 21, 2021 and Special Meeting of September 1, 2021. D2.Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Bi­Weekly Payroll in the Total Amount of $1,834,980.73 and City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers (Excluding Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company) in the Total Amount of $6,633,672.06 Dated August 23, 2021 Through September 06, 2021. (CITY/FIRE) ​ D3.Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers for Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company in the Total Amount of $677,663.21 Dated August 23, 2021 Through September 06, 2021. (CITY/FIRE) D4.Consideration of Reimbursement for the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Master Plan Drainage Improvements Program for Fiscal Year 2020/2021 and an Appropriation of $5,394 from the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Drainage Fund (Fund 116). (CITY) D5.Consideration to Approve an Amendment to a Special Services Agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Liebert Cassidy Whitmore, a Professional Law Corporation. (CITY) D6.Consideration of a Professional Services Agreement with Dapeer Rosenblit Litvak, LLP for Legal Services Related to the Municipal Code and Other Civil Matters. (CITY) D7.Consideration of an Improvement Agreement Extension for Case No. DRC2018­00430, Located East of Vineyard Avenue North of 8th Street, Submitted by Richard Collins Jr. (CITY) D8.Consideration to Accept as Complete, File a Notice of Completion, and Authorize Release of Retention, and Bonds for the School Crosswalk Improvements Project, Contract No. 2021­054. (CITY) D9.Consideration to Accept as Complete, File the Notice of Completion and Authorize Release of Retention and Bonds for the Hellman Avenue Sidewalk Improvements and ADA Ramps at Various Locations, Contract No. 2021­053. (CITY) D10.Consideration to Accept Public Improvements Located in the Village Commercial (VC) District of the Victoria Planned Community, South of Attwood Court and West of Victoria Park Lane, Related to Case No. DRC2017­00889, as Complete, File the Notice of Completion, and Authorize Release of Bonds. (CITY) D11.Consideration of a Resolution to Set Residential Bear Resistant Container Solid Waste Rate Within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021­099) (CITY) D12.Consideration of a Resolution Approving an Amendment to the Rancho Cucamonga City Employees Association Salary Schedule for Fiscal Year 2021­2022, Including the Addition of Supervising Traffic Systems Specialist Classification. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021­105) (CITY) D13.Consideration of the Improvement Agreement and Improvement Securities for Street Improvements, Order Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B, Street Light Maintenance Districts Nos. 1 and 6 for Case No. DRC2020­00026, Located at the Southwest Corner of 6th Street and Hyssop Drive. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021­101), (RESOLUTION NO. 2021­102), (RESOLUTION NO. 2021­103) (CITY) D14.Consideration of Resolutions of the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, Rancho Cucamonga, California, Amending Resolutions FD 2021­009, 2021­010, and 2021­011, and Approving Covenants and Restrictions for Real Property Pursuant to Government Code Section 54233.5. (RESOLUTION NOS. FD 2021­029, FD 2021­030 AND FD 2021­031) (FIRE) D15.Consideration to Adopt a Resolution Approving Side Letter Agreements between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and City Bargaining Units, Including a Part­Time City Employee Benefit. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021­104) (CITY) D16.Consideration to Adopt a Resolution Approving a Side Letter Agreement Between the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and Fire District Bargaining Units, Including a Part­Time Employee Benefit Update. (RESOLUTION NO. FD 2021­028). (FIRE) D17.Consideration of an Amendment to the Agreement for Professional Services with SMG­Rancho Cucamonga Premier Food Services LLC for Comprehensive Event and Meeting Sales, Management, Catering, and Concession Services for Certain Spaces at the Victoria Gardens Cultural Center and Lewis Family Playhouse. (CITY) D18.Consideration to Approve Amendment No. 001 to Contract No. 18­121 with KWall, LLC. for Additional Website Development. (CITY) E. CONSENT CALENDAR ORDINANCE(S) ­ SECOND READING/ADOPTION E1.Consideration of Second Reading and Adoption of the Following: Ordinance No.  983 An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, Adopting Municipal Code Amendment DRC2021­00281 to Amend Table 17.26.020­1, Section 17.30.030, Table 17.30.030­1, and Section 17.36.030 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to Establish Three New Zoning Districts and Adopt Associated Development Standards and Permitted Uses for Each New Zoning District, Adopting Zoning Map Amendment DRC2021­00283 to Rezone Certain Parcels as Set Forth Herein, Adopting an Addendum to the General Plan Program Environmental Impact Report Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, and Making Findings in Support Thereof Ordinance No.  984 An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, Approving Planned Community Amendment DRC2021­00284 to Amend the Terra Vista Planned Community to Rezone 13 Parcels to the New Urban Corridor Zoning District, Adopting an Addendum to the General Plan Program Environmental Impact Report Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, and Making Findings in Support Thereof Ordinance No.  985 An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, Adopting Planned Community Amendment DRC2021­00285 to Amend the Victoria Planned Community to Rezone Six Parcels Within the Specific Plan to the New Urban Center Zoning District, Adopting an Addendum to the General Plan Program Environmental Impact Report Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, and Making Findings in Support Thereof F. ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING ITEM(S) G. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM(S) ­ CITY/FIRE DISTRICT G1.8:00 P.M. TIME CERTAIN ­ PUBLIC HEARING #1 ­ Consideration of City Council Election District Boundaries, to Include Discussion Regarding the Redistricting Process, Review of Permissible Criteria to be Considered to Redraw City Council Election District Boundaries, and Receiving Public Input on Communities of Interest and Potential District Boundaries. (CITY) G2.Consideration to Approve the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program Year 2020­ 2021 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER). (CITY) G3.Consideration of a Resolution to Create a Residential Permit Parking District on Estacia Street, Elmhurst Avenue, Stafford Street, Dorset Court, Effen Street, and Cambridge Avenue Between Hermosa Avenue and Ramona Avenue Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 10.50. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021­100) (CITY) H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORT(S) H1.Consideration of a Resolution Proclaiming October 6, 2021, as California Clean Air Day. (RESOLUTION NO 2021­098) (CITY)   I. COUNCIL BUSINESS I1.Consideration of Santa Tour Activities for 2021. (CITY) I2.COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Council Member.) I3.INTER​AGENCY UPDATES (Update by the City Council to the community on the meetings that were attended.) J. CITY ATTORNEY ITEMS K. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING L. ADJOURNMENT CERTIFICATION I, Linda A. Troyan, MMC, City Clerk Services Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify under penalty of perjury that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on at least twenty​four (24) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California; 12505 Cultural Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA, 91739; and on the City's website.  LINDA A. TROYAN, MMC CITY CLERK SERVICES DIRECTOR If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's office at (909) 477­2700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired.  CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT “Our Vision is to build on our success as a world class community,to create an equitable,sustainable,and vibrant city,rich in opportunity for all to thrive.” Page 3 MayorL. Dennis MichaelMayor Pro TemLynne B. KennedyMembers of the CityCouncil:Ryan A. HutchisonKristine D. ScottSam Spagnolo CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGAREGULAR MEETING AGENDASeptember 15, 202110500 Civic Center DriveRancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARD – CITY COUNCILHOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY­ SUCCESSOR AGENCY – PUBLICFINANCE AUTHORITYCLOSED SESSION TRI­COMMUNITIES ROOM 4:30 P.M.REGULAR MEETINGS        COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 P.M.The City Council meets regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in theCouncil Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive.  It Is the Intent to conclude the meeting by 10:00p.m. unless extended by the concurrence of the City Council.  Agendas, minutes, and recordings ofmeetings can be found at www.cityofrc.us or by contacting the City Clerk's Office at 909­774­2023. LiveBroadcast available on Channel 3 (RCTV ­3).CLOSED SESSION – 4:30 P.M.  TRI­COMMUNITIES ROOM ROLL CALL: Mayor Michael                        Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy                        Council Members Hutchison, Scott, and Spagnolo A. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)C. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTSD. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSIOND1.CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR ROBERT NEIUBER, HUMAN RESOURCESDIRECTOR PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54954.2 REGARDING LABOR NEGOTIATIONSWITH THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION (RCCEA), TEAMSTERSLOCAL 1932, RANCHO CUCAMONGA MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENTGROUP, RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIREFIGHTERS LOCAL 2274, FIRE SUPPORT SERVICES ANDFIRE MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES GROUP – (CITY/FIRE)D2.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH(1)    OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: HIMNEL USA, INC. d/b/a ST.MARY'S MONTESSORI SCHOOL AND GLOBAL PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLC VS. CITY OFRANCHO CUCAMONGA, SBSC CASE NO.: CIVDS 2014554. – (CITY)D3.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH(1) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: PEPE’S INC. V. CITY OFRANCHO CUCAMONGA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, CENTRAL DISTRICT OFCALIFORNIA, CASE NO. 5:20CV02506JGBSP – (CITY)D4.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 12467 BASE LINE ROAD IDENTIFIED AS PARCELNUMBERS 1090331030000, 1090331040000, 1089581040000; NEGOTIATING PARTIES JOHNGILLISON, CITY MANAGER REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ANDJOSEPH FILIPPI, JOSEPH FILIPPI WINERY AND VINEYARDS; REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS.– (CITY)D5.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF THE SANSEVAINE CHANNEL, PARALLEL TO TORREY PINE COURT, FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS SANBERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBER 0228­044­24; NEGOTIATINGPARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHOCUCAMONGA, AND CHAO PING YANG, PROPERTY OWNER, REGARDING A PERMANENTEASEMENT FOR MULTI­USE PATH PURPOSES. – CITYD6.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL ­ ANTICIPATED LITIGATION: INITIATION OF LITIGATIONPURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.9: 1 CASE INVOLVING RJM DESIGN GROUP, TOVEY­SCHULTZ CONSTRUCTION, INC.,AND OTHER PARTIES ARISING OUT OF ALLEGED DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION DEFECTS ATTHE RC SPORTS CENTER – CITYD7.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8783 ETIWANDA AVENUE/12949 WHITTRAM AVENUE,FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER0229­162­14; NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER,  AND OVERLAND,PACIFIC AND CUTLER, REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND KULARTRUCK LINE, INC., OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNINGPRICE.  NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SETFORTH ABOVE. – CITYD8.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 9333 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED ASSAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229­162­23; NEGOTIATINGPARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER,  AND OVERLAND, PACIFIC AND CUTLER,REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON,OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTHABOVE. – CITYD9.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8949 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED ASSAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229­162­22; NEGOTIATINGPARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER,  AND OVERLAND, PACIFIC AND CUTLER,REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON,OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTHABOVE. – CITYE. RECESS – Closed Session to Recess to the Regular City Council Meeting at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers at City Hall, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. REGULAR MEETING – 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL:Mayor Michael Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy Council Members Hutchison, Scott, and Spagnolo A. AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDA B. ANNOUNCEMENT / PRESENTATIONS B1.Presentation of Certificate of Recognition Recognizing Delaney Spaulding, Team USA Softball Olympian and Rancho Cucamonga Resident. B2.Presentation of Proclamations of Recognition to Library Board of Trustees Members Luella G. Hairston, Esq. and Mary Hannah, and Library Foundation Director Heidi Soehnel for Their Service to the Rancho Cucamonga Public Library.  B3.Presentation of a Proclamation Proclaiming the Month of September as Suicide Prevention Month. C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS Members of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, and Public Finance Authority. This is the time and place for the general public to address the Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Council on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Mayor, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Fire Board, Agencies, Successor Agency, Authority Board, or City Council not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of the business portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topic contained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for these business items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of the agenda commences. Any other public communications which have not concluded during this one hour period may resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed. CONSENT CALENDARS: The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and noncontroversial. They will be acted upon without discussion unless an item is removed by Council Member for discussion. Members of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, and Public Finance Authority and may act on the consent calendar for those bodies as part of a single motion with the City Council consent calendar. D. CONSENT CALENDAR D1.Consideration of Meeting Minutes for the Regular Meetings of July 21, 2021 and Special Meeting of September 1, 2021. D2.Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Bi­Weekly Payroll in the Total Amount of $1,834,980.73 and City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers (Excluding Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company) in the Total Amount of $6,633,672.06 Dated August 23, 2021 Through September 06, 2021. (CITY/FIRE) ​ D3.Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers for Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company in the Total Amount of $677,663.21 Dated August 23, 2021 Through September 06, 2021. (CITY/FIRE) D4.Consideration of Reimbursement for the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Master Plan Drainage Improvements Program for Fiscal Year 2020/2021 and an Appropriation of $5,394 from the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Drainage Fund (Fund 116). (CITY) D5.Consideration to Approve an Amendment to a Special Services Agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Liebert Cassidy Whitmore, a Professional Law Corporation. (CITY) D6.Consideration of a Professional Services Agreement with Dapeer Rosenblit Litvak, LLP for Legal Services Related to the Municipal Code and Other Civil Matters. (CITY) D7.Consideration of an Improvement Agreement Extension for Case No. DRC2018­00430, Located East of Vineyard Avenue North of 8th Street, Submitted by Richard Collins Jr. (CITY) D8.Consideration to Accept as Complete, File a Notice of Completion, and Authorize Release of Retention, and Bonds for the School Crosswalk Improvements Project, Contract No. 2021­054. (CITY) D9.Consideration to Accept as Complete, File the Notice of Completion and Authorize Release of Retention and Bonds for the Hellman Avenue Sidewalk Improvements and ADA Ramps at Various Locations, Contract No. 2021­053. (CITY) D10.Consideration to Accept Public Improvements Located in the Village Commercial (VC) District of the Victoria Planned Community, South of Attwood Court and West of Victoria Park Lane, Related to Case No. DRC2017­00889, as Complete, File the Notice of Completion, and Authorize Release of Bonds. (CITY) D11.Consideration of a Resolution to Set Residential Bear Resistant Container Solid Waste Rate Within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021­099) (CITY) D12.Consideration of a Resolution Approving an Amendment to the Rancho Cucamonga City Employees Association Salary Schedule for Fiscal Year 2021­2022, Including the Addition of Supervising Traffic Systems Specialist Classification. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021­105) (CITY) D13.Consideration of the Improvement Agreement and Improvement Securities for Street Improvements, Order Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B, Street Light Maintenance Districts Nos. 1 and 6 for Case No. DRC2020­00026, Located at the Southwest Corner of 6th Street and Hyssop Drive. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021­101), (RESOLUTION NO. 2021­102), (RESOLUTION NO. 2021­103) (CITY) D14.Consideration of Resolutions of the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, Rancho Cucamonga, California, Amending Resolutions FD 2021­009, 2021­010, and 2021­011, and Approving Covenants and Restrictions for Real Property Pursuant to Government Code Section 54233.5. (RESOLUTION NOS. FD 2021­029, FD 2021­030 AND FD 2021­031) (FIRE) D15.Consideration to Adopt a Resolution Approving Side Letter Agreements between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and City Bargaining Units, Including a Part­Time City Employee Benefit. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021­104) (CITY) D16.Consideration to Adopt a Resolution Approving a Side Letter Agreement Between the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and Fire District Bargaining Units, Including a Part­Time Employee Benefit Update. (RESOLUTION NO. FD 2021­028). (FIRE) D17.Consideration of an Amendment to the Agreement for Professional Services with SMG­Rancho Cucamonga Premier Food Services LLC for Comprehensive Event and Meeting Sales, Management, Catering, and Concession Services for Certain Spaces at the Victoria Gardens Cultural Center and Lewis Family Playhouse. (CITY) D18.Consideration to Approve Amendment No. 001 to Contract No. 18­121 with KWall, LLC. for Additional Website Development. (CITY) E. CONSENT CALENDAR ORDINANCE(S) ­ SECOND READING/ADOPTION E1.Consideration of Second Reading and Adoption of the Following: Ordinance No.  983 An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, Adopting Municipal Code Amendment DRC2021­00281 to Amend Table 17.26.020­1, Section 17.30.030, Table 17.30.030­1, and Section 17.36.030 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to Establish Three New Zoning Districts and Adopt Associated Development Standards and Permitted Uses for Each New Zoning District, Adopting Zoning Map Amendment DRC2021­00283 to Rezone Certain Parcels as Set Forth Herein, Adopting an Addendum to the General Plan Program Environmental Impact Report Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, and Making Findings in Support Thereof Ordinance No.  984 An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, Approving Planned Community Amendment DRC2021­00284 to Amend the Terra Vista Planned Community to Rezone 13 Parcels to the New Urban Corridor Zoning District, Adopting an Addendum to the General Plan Program Environmental Impact Report Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, and Making Findings in Support Thereof Ordinance No.  985 An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, Adopting Planned Community Amendment DRC2021­00285 to Amend the Victoria Planned Community to Rezone Six Parcels Within the Specific Plan to the New Urban Center Zoning District, Adopting an Addendum to the General Plan Program Environmental Impact Report Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, and Making Findings in Support Thereof F. ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING ITEM(S) G. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM(S) ­ CITY/FIRE DISTRICT G1.8:00 P.M. TIME CERTAIN ­ PUBLIC HEARING #1 ­ Consideration of City Council Election District Boundaries, to Include Discussion Regarding the Redistricting Process, Review of Permissible Criteria to be Considered to Redraw City Council Election District Boundaries, and Receiving Public Input on Communities of Interest and Potential District Boundaries. (CITY) G2.Consideration to Approve the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program Year 2020­ 2021 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER). (CITY) G3.Consideration of a Resolution to Create a Residential Permit Parking District on Estacia Street, Elmhurst Avenue, Stafford Street, Dorset Court, Effen Street, and Cambridge Avenue Between Hermosa Avenue and Ramona Avenue Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 10.50. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021­100) (CITY) H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORT(S) H1.Consideration of a Resolution Proclaiming October 6, 2021, as California Clean Air Day. (RESOLUTION NO 2021­098) (CITY)   I. COUNCIL BUSINESS I1.Consideration of Santa Tour Activities for 2021. (CITY) I2.COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Council Member.) I3.INTER​AGENCY UPDATES (Update by the City Council to the community on the meetings that were attended.) J. CITY ATTORNEY ITEMS K. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING L. ADJOURNMENT CERTIFICATION I, Linda A. Troyan, MMC, City Clerk Services Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify under penalty of perjury that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on at least twenty​four (24) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California; 12505 Cultural Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA, 91739; and on the City's website.  LINDA A. TROYAN, MMC CITY CLERK SERVICES DIRECTOR If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's office at (909) 477­2700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired.  CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT “Our Vision is to build on our success as a world class community,to create an equitable,sustainable,and vibrant city,rich in opportunity for all to thrive.” Page 4 --- --- --- MayorL. Dennis MichaelMayor Pro TemLynne B. KennedyMembers of the CityCouncil:Ryan A. HutchisonKristine D. ScottSam Spagnolo CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGAREGULAR MEETING AGENDASeptember 15, 202110500 Civic Center DriveRancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARD – CITY COUNCILHOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY­ SUCCESSOR AGENCY – PUBLICFINANCE AUTHORITYCLOSED SESSION TRI­COMMUNITIES ROOM 4:30 P.M.REGULAR MEETINGS        COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 P.M.The City Council meets regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in theCouncil Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive.  It Is the Intent to conclude the meeting by 10:00p.m. unless extended by the concurrence of the City Council.  Agendas, minutes, and recordings ofmeetings can be found at www.cityofrc.us or by contacting the City Clerk's Office at 909­774­2023. LiveBroadcast available on Channel 3 (RCTV ­3).CLOSED SESSION – 4:30 P.M.  TRI­COMMUNITIES ROOM ROLL CALL: Mayor Michael                        Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy                        Council Members Hutchison, Scott, and Spagnolo A. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)C. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTSD. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSIOND1.CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR ROBERT NEIUBER, HUMAN RESOURCESDIRECTOR PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54954.2 REGARDING LABOR NEGOTIATIONSWITH THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION (RCCEA), TEAMSTERSLOCAL 1932, RANCHO CUCAMONGA MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENTGROUP, RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIREFIGHTERS LOCAL 2274, FIRE SUPPORT SERVICES ANDFIRE MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES GROUP – (CITY/FIRE)D2.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH(1)    OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: HIMNEL USA, INC. d/b/a ST.MARY'S MONTESSORI SCHOOL AND GLOBAL PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLC VS. CITY OFRANCHO CUCAMONGA, SBSC CASE NO.: CIVDS 2014554. – (CITY)D3.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH(1) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: PEPE’S INC. V. CITY OFRANCHO CUCAMONGA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, CENTRAL DISTRICT OFCALIFORNIA, CASE NO. 5:20CV02506JGBSP – (CITY)D4.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 12467 BASE LINE ROAD IDENTIFIED AS PARCELNUMBERS 1090331030000, 1090331040000, 1089581040000; NEGOTIATING PARTIES JOHNGILLISON, CITY MANAGER REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ANDJOSEPH FILIPPI, JOSEPH FILIPPI WINERY AND VINEYARDS; REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS.– (CITY)D5.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF THE SANSEVAINE CHANNEL, PARALLEL TO TORREY PINE COURT, FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS SANBERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBER 0228­044­24; NEGOTIATINGPARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHOCUCAMONGA, AND CHAO PING YANG, PROPERTY OWNER, REGARDING A PERMANENTEASEMENT FOR MULTI­USE PATH PURPOSES. – CITYD6.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL ­ ANTICIPATED LITIGATION: INITIATION OF LITIGATIONPURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.9: 1 CASE INVOLVING RJM DESIGN GROUP, TOVEY­SCHULTZ CONSTRUCTION, INC.,AND OTHER PARTIES ARISING OUT OF ALLEGED DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION DEFECTS ATTHE RC SPORTS CENTER – CITYD7.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8783 ETIWANDA AVENUE/12949 WHITTRAM AVENUE,FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER0229­162­14; NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER,  AND OVERLAND,PACIFIC AND CUTLER, REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND KULARTRUCK LINE, INC., OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNINGPRICE.  NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SETFORTH ABOVE. – CITYD8.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 9333 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED ASSAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229­162­23; NEGOTIATINGPARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER,  AND OVERLAND, PACIFIC AND CUTLER,REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON,OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTHABOVE. – CITYD9.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8949 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED ASSAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229­162­22; NEGOTIATINGPARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER,  AND OVERLAND, PACIFIC AND CUTLER,REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON,OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTHABOVE. – CITYE. RECESS – Closed Session to Recess to the Regular City Council Meeting at 7:00 P.M. in the CouncilChambers at City Hall, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California.REGULAR MEETING – 7:00 P.M.COUNCIL CHAMBERSPLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCEROLL CALL:Mayor MichaelMayor Pro Tem KennedyCouncil Members Hutchison, Scott, and SpagnoloA. AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDAB. ANNOUNCEMENT / PRESENTATIONSB1.Presentation of Certificate of Recognition Recognizing Delaney Spaulding, Team USA SoftballOlympian and Rancho Cucamonga Resident.B2.Presentation of Proclamations of Recognition to Library Board of Trustees Members Luella G.Hairston, Esq. and Mary Hannah, and Library Foundation Director Heidi Soehnel for Their Service tothe Rancho Cucamonga Public Library. B3.Presentation of a Proclamation Proclaiming the Month of September as Suicide Prevention Month.C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONSMembers of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, SuccessorAgency, and Public Finance Authority. This is the time and place for the general public to addressthe Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public FinancingAuthority Board, and City Council on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits theFire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board,and City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Fire ProtectionDistrict, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Councilmay receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting.Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by theMayor, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to beaddressed directly to the Fire Board, Agencies, Successor Agency, Authority Board, or City Council not to themembers of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected.Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in anyactivity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting.The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of thebusiness portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topiccontained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for thesebusiness items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of theagenda commences. Any other public communications which have not concluded during this one hour periodmay resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed. CONSENT CALENDARS: The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and noncontroversial. They will be acted upon without discussion unless an item is removed by Council Member for discussion. Members of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, and Public Finance Authority and may act on the consent calendar for those bodies as part of a single motion with the City Council consent calendar. D. CONSENT CALENDAR D1.Consideration of Meeting Minutes for the Regular Meetings of July 21, 2021 and Special Meeting of September 1, 2021. D2.Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Bi­Weekly Payroll in the Total Amount of $1,834,980.73 and City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers (Excluding Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company) in the Total Amount of $6,633,672.06 Dated August 23, 2021 Through September 06, 2021. (CITY/FIRE) ​ D3.Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers for Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company in the Total Amount of $677,663.21 Dated August 23, 2021 Through September 06, 2021. (CITY/FIRE) D4.Consideration of Reimbursement for the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Master Plan Drainage Improvements Program for Fiscal Year 2020/2021 and an Appropriation of $5,394 from the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Drainage Fund (Fund 116). (CITY) D5.Consideration to Approve an Amendment to a Special Services Agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Liebert Cassidy Whitmore, a Professional Law Corporation. (CITY) D6.Consideration of a Professional Services Agreement with Dapeer Rosenblit Litvak, LLP for Legal Services Related to the Municipal Code and Other Civil Matters. (CITY) D7.Consideration of an Improvement Agreement Extension for Case No. DRC2018­00430, Located East of Vineyard Avenue North of 8th Street, Submitted by Richard Collins Jr. (CITY) D8.Consideration to Accept as Complete, File a Notice of Completion, and Authorize Release of Retention, and Bonds for the School Crosswalk Improvements Project, Contract No. 2021­054. (CITY) D9.Consideration to Accept as Complete, File the Notice of Completion and Authorize Release of Retention and Bonds for the Hellman Avenue Sidewalk Improvements and ADA Ramps at Various Locations, Contract No. 2021­053. (CITY) D10.Consideration to Accept Public Improvements Located in the Village Commercial (VC) District of the Victoria Planned Community, South of Attwood Court and West of Victoria Park Lane, Related to Case No. DRC2017­00889, as Complete, File the Notice of Completion, and Authorize Release of Bonds. (CITY) D11.Consideration of a Resolution to Set Residential Bear Resistant Container Solid Waste Rate Within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021­099) (CITY) D12.Consideration of a Resolution Approving an Amendment to the Rancho Cucamonga City Employees Association Salary Schedule for Fiscal Year 2021­2022, Including the Addition of Supervising Traffic Systems Specialist Classification. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021­105) (CITY) D13.Consideration of the Improvement Agreement and Improvement Securities for Street Improvements, Order Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B, Street Light Maintenance Districts Nos. 1 and 6 for Case No. DRC2020­00026, Located at the Southwest Corner of 6th Street and Hyssop Drive. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021­101), (RESOLUTION NO. 2021­102), (RESOLUTION NO. 2021­103) (CITY) D14.Consideration of Resolutions of the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, Rancho Cucamonga, California, Amending Resolutions FD 2021­009, 2021­010, and 2021­011, and Approving Covenants and Restrictions for Real Property Pursuant to Government Code Section 54233.5. (RESOLUTION NOS. FD 2021­029, FD 2021­030 AND FD 2021­031) (FIRE) D15.Consideration to Adopt a Resolution Approving Side Letter Agreements between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and City Bargaining Units, Including a Part­Time City Employee Benefit. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021­104) (CITY) D16.Consideration to Adopt a Resolution Approving a Side Letter Agreement Between the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and Fire District Bargaining Units, Including a Part­Time Employee Benefit Update. (RESOLUTION NO. FD 2021­028). (FIRE) D17.Consideration of an Amendment to the Agreement for Professional Services with SMG­Rancho Cucamonga Premier Food Services LLC for Comprehensive Event and Meeting Sales, Management, Catering, and Concession Services for Certain Spaces at the Victoria Gardens Cultural Center and Lewis Family Playhouse. (CITY) D18.Consideration to Approve Amendment No. 001 to Contract No. 18­121 with KWall, LLC. for Additional Website Development. (CITY) E. CONSENT CALENDAR ORDINANCE(S) ­ SECOND READING/ADOPTION E1.Consideration of Second Reading and Adoption of the Following: Ordinance No.  983 An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, Adopting Municipal Code Amendment DRC2021­00281 to Amend Table 17.26.020­1, Section 17.30.030, Table 17.30.030­1, and Section 17.36.030 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to Establish Three New Zoning Districts and Adopt Associated Development Standards and Permitted Uses for Each New Zoning District, Adopting Zoning Map Amendment DRC2021­00283 to Rezone Certain Parcels as Set Forth Herein, Adopting an Addendum to the General Plan Program Environmental Impact Report Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, and Making Findings in Support Thereof Ordinance No.  984 An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, Approving Planned Community Amendment DRC2021­00284 to Amend the Terra Vista Planned Community to Rezone 13 Parcels to the New Urban Corridor Zoning District, Adopting an Addendum to the General Plan Program Environmental Impact Report Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, and Making Findings in Support Thereof Ordinance No.  985 An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, Adopting Planned Community Amendment DRC2021­00285 to Amend the Victoria Planned Community to Rezone Six Parcels Within the Specific Plan to the New Urban Center Zoning District, Adopting an Addendum to the General Plan Program Environmental Impact Report Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, and Making Findings in Support Thereof F. ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING ITEM(S) G. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM(S) ­ CITY/FIRE DISTRICT G1.8:00 P.M. TIME CERTAIN ­ PUBLIC HEARING #1 ­ Consideration of City Council Election District Boundaries, to Include Discussion Regarding the Redistricting Process, Review of Permissible Criteria to be Considered to Redraw City Council Election District Boundaries, and Receiving Public Input on Communities of Interest and Potential District Boundaries. (CITY) G2.Consideration to Approve the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program Year 2020­ 2021 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER). (CITY) G3.Consideration of a Resolution to Create a Residential Permit Parking District on Estacia Street, Elmhurst Avenue, Stafford Street, Dorset Court, Effen Street, and Cambridge Avenue Between Hermosa Avenue and Ramona Avenue Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 10.50. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021­100) (CITY) H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORT(S) H1.Consideration of a Resolution Proclaiming October 6, 2021, as California Clean Air Day. (RESOLUTION NO 2021­098) (CITY)   I. COUNCIL BUSINESS I1.Consideration of Santa Tour Activities for 2021. (CITY) I2.COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Council Member.) I3.INTER​AGENCY UPDATES (Update by the City Council to the community on the meetings that were attended.) J. CITY ATTORNEY ITEMS K. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING L. ADJOURNMENT CERTIFICATION I, Linda A. Troyan, MMC, City Clerk Services Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify under penalty of perjury that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on at least twenty​four (24) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California; 12505 Cultural Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA, 91739; and on the City's website.  LINDA A. TROYAN, MMC CITY CLERK SERVICES DIRECTOR If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's office at (909) 477­2700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired.  CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT “Our Vision is to build on our success as a world class community,to create an equitable,sustainable,and vibrant city,rich in opportunity for all to thrive.” Page 5 9 17 26 28 31 60 71 73 77 81 MayorL. Dennis MichaelMayor Pro TemLynne B. KennedyMembers of the CityCouncil:Ryan A. HutchisonKristine D. ScottSam Spagnolo CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGAREGULAR MEETING AGENDASeptember 15, 202110500 Civic Center DriveRancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARD – CITY COUNCILHOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY­ SUCCESSOR AGENCY – PUBLICFINANCE AUTHORITYCLOSED SESSION TRI­COMMUNITIES ROOM 4:30 P.M.REGULAR MEETINGS        COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 P.M.The City Council meets regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in theCouncil Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive.  It Is the Intent to conclude the meeting by 10:00p.m. unless extended by the concurrence of the City Council.  Agendas, minutes, and recordings ofmeetings can be found at www.cityofrc.us or by contacting the City Clerk's Office at 909­774­2023. LiveBroadcast available on Channel 3 (RCTV ­3).CLOSED SESSION – 4:30 P.M.  TRI­COMMUNITIES ROOM ROLL CALL: Mayor Michael                        Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy                        Council Members Hutchison, Scott, and Spagnolo A. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)C. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTSD. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSIOND1.CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR ROBERT NEIUBER, HUMAN RESOURCESDIRECTOR PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54954.2 REGARDING LABOR NEGOTIATIONSWITH THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION (RCCEA), TEAMSTERSLOCAL 1932, RANCHO CUCAMONGA MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENTGROUP, RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIREFIGHTERS LOCAL 2274, FIRE SUPPORT SERVICES ANDFIRE MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES GROUP – (CITY/FIRE)D2.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH(1)    OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: HIMNEL USA, INC. d/b/a ST.MARY'S MONTESSORI SCHOOL AND GLOBAL PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLC VS. CITY OFRANCHO CUCAMONGA, SBSC CASE NO.: CIVDS 2014554. – (CITY)D3.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH(1) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: PEPE’S INC. V. CITY OFRANCHO CUCAMONGA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, CENTRAL DISTRICT OFCALIFORNIA, CASE NO. 5:20CV02506JGBSP – (CITY)D4.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 12467 BASE LINE ROAD IDENTIFIED AS PARCELNUMBERS 1090331030000, 1090331040000, 1089581040000; NEGOTIATING PARTIES JOHNGILLISON, CITY MANAGER REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ANDJOSEPH FILIPPI, JOSEPH FILIPPI WINERY AND VINEYARDS; REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS.– (CITY)D5.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF THE SANSEVAINE CHANNEL, PARALLEL TO TORREY PINE COURT, FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS SANBERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBER 0228­044­24; NEGOTIATINGPARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHOCUCAMONGA, AND CHAO PING YANG, PROPERTY OWNER, REGARDING A PERMANENTEASEMENT FOR MULTI­USE PATH PURPOSES. – CITYD6.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL ­ ANTICIPATED LITIGATION: INITIATION OF LITIGATIONPURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.9: 1 CASE INVOLVING RJM DESIGN GROUP, TOVEY­SCHULTZ CONSTRUCTION, INC.,AND OTHER PARTIES ARISING OUT OF ALLEGED DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION DEFECTS ATTHE RC SPORTS CENTER – CITYD7.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8783 ETIWANDA AVENUE/12949 WHITTRAM AVENUE,FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER0229­162­14; NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER,  AND OVERLAND,PACIFIC AND CUTLER, REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND KULARTRUCK LINE, INC., OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNINGPRICE.  NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SETFORTH ABOVE. – CITYD8.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 9333 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED ASSAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229­162­23; NEGOTIATINGPARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER,  AND OVERLAND, PACIFIC AND CUTLER,REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON,OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTHABOVE. – CITYD9.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8949 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED ASSAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229­162­22; NEGOTIATINGPARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER,  AND OVERLAND, PACIFIC AND CUTLER,REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON,OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTHABOVE. – CITYE. RECESS – Closed Session to Recess to the Regular City Council Meeting at 7:00 P.M. in the CouncilChambers at City Hall, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California.REGULAR MEETING – 7:00 P.M.COUNCIL CHAMBERSPLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCEROLL CALL:Mayor MichaelMayor Pro Tem KennedyCouncil Members Hutchison, Scott, and SpagnoloA. AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDAB. ANNOUNCEMENT / PRESENTATIONSB1.Presentation of Certificate of Recognition Recognizing Delaney Spaulding, Team USA SoftballOlympian and Rancho Cucamonga Resident.B2.Presentation of Proclamations of Recognition to Library Board of Trustees Members Luella G.Hairston, Esq. and Mary Hannah, and Library Foundation Director Heidi Soehnel for Their Service tothe Rancho Cucamonga Public Library. B3.Presentation of a Proclamation Proclaiming the Month of September as Suicide Prevention Month.C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONSMembers of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, SuccessorAgency, and Public Finance Authority. This is the time and place for the general public to addressthe Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public FinancingAuthority Board, and City Council on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits theFire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board,and City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Fire ProtectionDistrict, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Councilmay receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting.Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by theMayor, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to beaddressed directly to the Fire Board, Agencies, Successor Agency, Authority Board, or City Council not to themembers of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected.Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in anyactivity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting.The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of thebusiness portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topiccontained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for thesebusiness items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of theagenda commences. Any other public communications which have not concluded during this one hour periodmay resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed.CONSENT CALENDARS:The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and noncontroversial. They will be actedupon without discussion unless an item is removed by Council Member for discussion.Members of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, andPublic Finance Authority and may act on the consent calendar for those bodies as part of a single motion withthe City Council consent calendar.D. CONSENT CALENDARD1.Consideration of Meeting Minutes for the Regular Meetings of July 21, 2021 and SpecialMeeting of September 1, 2021.D2.Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Bi­Weekly Payroll in the Total Amount of$1,834,980.73 and City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers (Excluding Checks Issued toSouthern California Gas Company) in the Total Amount of $6,633,672.06 Dated August 23,2021 Through September 06, 2021. (CITY/FIRE) ​D3.Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers for Checks Issued toSouthern California Gas Company in the Total Amount of $677,663.21 Dated August 23, 2021Through September 06, 2021. (CITY/FIRE)D4.Consideration of Reimbursement for the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Master Plan DrainageImprovements Program for Fiscal Year 2020/2021 and an Appropriation of $5,394 from theEtiwanda/San Sevaine Drainage Fund (Fund 116). (CITY)D5.Consideration to Approve an Amendment to a Special Services Agreement between the Cityof Rancho Cucamonga and Liebert Cassidy Whitmore, a Professional Law Corporation. (CITY)D6.Consideration of a Professional Services Agreement with Dapeer Rosenblit Litvak, LLP forLegal Services Related to the Municipal Code and Other Civil Matters. (CITY)D7.Consideration of an Improvement Agreement Extension for Case No. DRC2018­00430,Located East of Vineyard Avenue North of 8th Street, Submitted by Richard Collins Jr. (CITY)D8.Consideration to Accept as Complete, File a Notice of Completion, and Authorize Release ofRetention, and Bonds for the School Crosswalk Improvements Project, Contract No. 2021­054.(CITY)D9.Consideration to Accept as Complete, File the Notice of Completion and Authorize Release ofRetention and Bonds for the Hellman Avenue Sidewalk Improvements and ADA Ramps atVarious Locations, Contract No. 2021­053. (CITY)D10.Consideration to Accept Public Improvements Located in the Village Commercial (VC) Districtof the Victoria Planned Community, South of Attwood Court and West of Victoria Park Lane,Related to Case No. DRC2017­00889, as Complete, File the Notice of Completion, and Authorize Release of Bonds. (CITY) D11.Consideration of a Resolution to Set Residential Bear Resistant Container Solid Waste Rate Within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021­099) (CITY) D12.Consideration of a Resolution Approving an Amendment to the Rancho Cucamonga City Employees Association Salary Schedule for Fiscal Year 2021­2022, Including the Addition of Supervising Traffic Systems Specialist Classification. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021­105) (CITY) D13.Consideration of the Improvement Agreement and Improvement Securities for Street Improvements, Order Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B, Street Light Maintenance Districts Nos. 1 and 6 for Case No. DRC2020­00026, Located at the Southwest Corner of 6th Street and Hyssop Drive. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021­101), (RESOLUTION NO. 2021­102), (RESOLUTION NO. 2021­103) (CITY) D14.Consideration of Resolutions of the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, Rancho Cucamonga, California, Amending Resolutions FD 2021­009, 2021­010, and 2021­011, and Approving Covenants and Restrictions for Real Property Pursuant to Government Code Section 54233.5. (RESOLUTION NOS. FD 2021­029, FD 2021­030 AND FD 2021­031) (FIRE) D15.Consideration to Adopt a Resolution Approving Side Letter Agreements between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and City Bargaining Units, Including a Part­Time City Employee Benefit. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021­104) (CITY) D16.Consideration to Adopt a Resolution Approving a Side Letter Agreement Between the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and Fire District Bargaining Units, Including a Part­Time Employee Benefit Update. (RESOLUTION NO. FD 2021­028). (FIRE) D17.Consideration of an Amendment to the Agreement for Professional Services with SMG­Rancho Cucamonga Premier Food Services LLC for Comprehensive Event and Meeting Sales, Management, Catering, and Concession Services for Certain Spaces at the Victoria Gardens Cultural Center and Lewis Family Playhouse. (CITY) D18.Consideration to Approve Amendment No. 001 to Contract No. 18­121 with KWall, LLC. for Additional Website Development. (CITY) E. CONSENT CALENDAR ORDINANCE(S) ­ SECOND READING/ADOPTION E1.Consideration of Second Reading and Adoption of the Following: Ordinance No.  983 An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, Adopting Municipal Code Amendment DRC2021­00281 to Amend Table 17.26.020­1, Section 17.30.030, Table 17.30.030­1, and Section 17.36.030 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to Establish Three New Zoning Districts and Adopt Associated Development Standards and Permitted Uses for Each New Zoning District, Adopting Zoning Map Amendment DRC2021­00283 to Rezone Certain Parcels as Set Forth Herein, Adopting an Addendum to the General Plan Program Environmental Impact Report Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, and Making Findings in Support Thereof Ordinance No.  984 An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, Approving Planned Community Amendment DRC2021­00284 to Amend the Terra Vista Planned Community to Rezone 13 Parcels to the New Urban Corridor Zoning District, Adopting an Addendum to the General Plan Program Environmental Impact Report Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, and Making Findings in Support Thereof Ordinance No.  985 An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, Adopting Planned Community Amendment DRC2021­00285 to Amend the Victoria Planned Community to Rezone Six Parcels Within the Specific Plan to the New Urban Center Zoning District, Adopting an Addendum to the General Plan Program Environmental Impact Report Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, and Making Findings in Support Thereof F. ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING ITEM(S) G. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM(S) ­ CITY/FIRE DISTRICT G1.8:00 P.M. TIME CERTAIN ­ PUBLIC HEARING #1 ­ Consideration of City Council Election District Boundaries, to Include Discussion Regarding the Redistricting Process, Review of Permissible Criteria to be Considered to Redraw City Council Election District Boundaries, and Receiving Public Input on Communities of Interest and Potential District Boundaries. (CITY) G2.Consideration to Approve the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program Year 2020­ 2021 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER). (CITY) G3.Consideration of a Resolution to Create a Residential Permit Parking District on Estacia Street, Elmhurst Avenue, Stafford Street, Dorset Court, Effen Street, and Cambridge Avenue Between Hermosa Avenue and Ramona Avenue Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 10.50. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021­100) (CITY) H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORT(S) H1.Consideration of a Resolution Proclaiming October 6, 2021, as California Clean Air Day. (RESOLUTION NO 2021­098) (CITY)   I. COUNCIL BUSINESS I1.Consideration of Santa Tour Activities for 2021. (CITY) I2.COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Council Member.) I3.INTER​AGENCY UPDATES (Update by the City Council to the community on the meetings that were attended.) J. CITY ATTORNEY ITEMS K. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING L. ADJOURNMENT CERTIFICATION I, Linda A. Troyan, MMC, City Clerk Services Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify under penalty of perjury that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on at least twenty​four (24) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California; 12505 Cultural Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA, 91739; and on the City's website.  LINDA A. TROYAN, MMC CITY CLERK SERVICES DIRECTOR If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's office at (909) 477­2700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired.  CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT “Our Vision is to build on our success as a world class community,to create an equitable,sustainable,and vibrant city,rich in opportunity for all to thrive.” Page 6 84 87 94 112 130 144 155 158 MayorL. Dennis MichaelMayor Pro TemLynne B. KennedyMembers of the CityCouncil:Ryan A. HutchisonKristine D. ScottSam Spagnolo CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGAREGULAR MEETING AGENDASeptember 15, 202110500 Civic Center DriveRancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARD – CITY COUNCILHOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY­ SUCCESSOR AGENCY – PUBLICFINANCE AUTHORITYCLOSED SESSION TRI­COMMUNITIES ROOM 4:30 P.M.REGULAR MEETINGS        COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 P.M.The City Council meets regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in theCouncil Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive.  It Is the Intent to conclude the meeting by 10:00p.m. unless extended by the concurrence of the City Council.  Agendas, minutes, and recordings ofmeetings can be found at www.cityofrc.us or by contacting the City Clerk's Office at 909­774­2023. LiveBroadcast available on Channel 3 (RCTV ­3).CLOSED SESSION – 4:30 P.M.  TRI­COMMUNITIES ROOM ROLL CALL: Mayor Michael                        Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy                        Council Members Hutchison, Scott, and Spagnolo A. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)C. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTSD. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSIOND1.CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR ROBERT NEIUBER, HUMAN RESOURCESDIRECTOR PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54954.2 REGARDING LABOR NEGOTIATIONSWITH THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION (RCCEA), TEAMSTERSLOCAL 1932, RANCHO CUCAMONGA MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENTGROUP, RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIREFIGHTERS LOCAL 2274, FIRE SUPPORT SERVICES ANDFIRE MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES GROUP – (CITY/FIRE)D2.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH(1)    OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: HIMNEL USA, INC. d/b/a ST.MARY'S MONTESSORI SCHOOL AND GLOBAL PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLC VS. CITY OFRANCHO CUCAMONGA, SBSC CASE NO.: CIVDS 2014554. – (CITY)D3.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH(1) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: PEPE’S INC. V. CITY OFRANCHO CUCAMONGA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, CENTRAL DISTRICT OFCALIFORNIA, CASE NO. 5:20CV02506JGBSP – (CITY)D4.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 12467 BASE LINE ROAD IDENTIFIED AS PARCELNUMBERS 1090331030000, 1090331040000, 1089581040000; NEGOTIATING PARTIES JOHNGILLISON, CITY MANAGER REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ANDJOSEPH FILIPPI, JOSEPH FILIPPI WINERY AND VINEYARDS; REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS.– (CITY)D5.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF THE SANSEVAINE CHANNEL, PARALLEL TO TORREY PINE COURT, FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS SANBERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBER 0228­044­24; NEGOTIATINGPARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHOCUCAMONGA, AND CHAO PING YANG, PROPERTY OWNER, REGARDING A PERMANENTEASEMENT FOR MULTI­USE PATH PURPOSES. – CITYD6.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL ­ ANTICIPATED LITIGATION: INITIATION OF LITIGATIONPURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.9: 1 CASE INVOLVING RJM DESIGN GROUP, TOVEY­SCHULTZ CONSTRUCTION, INC.,AND OTHER PARTIES ARISING OUT OF ALLEGED DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION DEFECTS ATTHE RC SPORTS CENTER – CITYD7.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8783 ETIWANDA AVENUE/12949 WHITTRAM AVENUE,FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER0229­162­14; NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER,  AND OVERLAND,PACIFIC AND CUTLER, REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND KULARTRUCK LINE, INC., OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNINGPRICE.  NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SETFORTH ABOVE. – CITYD8.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 9333 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED ASSAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229­162­23; NEGOTIATINGPARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER,  AND OVERLAND, PACIFIC AND CUTLER,REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON,OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTHABOVE. – CITYD9.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8949 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED ASSAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229­162­22; NEGOTIATINGPARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER,  AND OVERLAND, PACIFIC AND CUTLER,REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON,OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTHABOVE. – CITYE. RECESS – Closed Session to Recess to the Regular City Council Meeting at 7:00 P.M. in the CouncilChambers at City Hall, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California.REGULAR MEETING – 7:00 P.M.COUNCIL CHAMBERSPLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCEROLL CALL:Mayor MichaelMayor Pro Tem KennedyCouncil Members Hutchison, Scott, and SpagnoloA. AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDAB. ANNOUNCEMENT / PRESENTATIONSB1.Presentation of Certificate of Recognition Recognizing Delaney Spaulding, Team USA SoftballOlympian and Rancho Cucamonga Resident.B2.Presentation of Proclamations of Recognition to Library Board of Trustees Members Luella G.Hairston, Esq. and Mary Hannah, and Library Foundation Director Heidi Soehnel for Their Service tothe Rancho Cucamonga Public Library. B3.Presentation of a Proclamation Proclaiming the Month of September as Suicide Prevention Month.C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONSMembers of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, SuccessorAgency, and Public Finance Authority. This is the time and place for the general public to addressthe Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public FinancingAuthority Board, and City Council on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits theFire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board,and City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Fire ProtectionDistrict, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Councilmay receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting.Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by theMayor, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to beaddressed directly to the Fire Board, Agencies, Successor Agency, Authority Board, or City Council not to themembers of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected.Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in anyactivity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting.The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of thebusiness portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topiccontained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for thesebusiness items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of theagenda commences. Any other public communications which have not concluded during this one hour periodmay resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed.CONSENT CALENDARS:The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and noncontroversial. They will be actedupon without discussion unless an item is removed by Council Member for discussion.Members of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, andPublic Finance Authority and may act on the consent calendar for those bodies as part of a single motion withthe City Council consent calendar.D. CONSENT CALENDARD1.Consideration of Meeting Minutes for the Regular Meetings of July 21, 2021 and SpecialMeeting of September 1, 2021.D2.Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Bi­Weekly Payroll in the Total Amount of$1,834,980.73 and City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers (Excluding Checks Issued toSouthern California Gas Company) in the Total Amount of $6,633,672.06 Dated August 23,2021 Through September 06, 2021. (CITY/FIRE) ​D3.Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers for Checks Issued toSouthern California Gas Company in the Total Amount of $677,663.21 Dated August 23, 2021Through September 06, 2021. (CITY/FIRE)D4.Consideration of Reimbursement for the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Master Plan DrainageImprovements Program for Fiscal Year 2020/2021 and an Appropriation of $5,394 from theEtiwanda/San Sevaine Drainage Fund (Fund 116). (CITY)D5.Consideration to Approve an Amendment to a Special Services Agreement between the Cityof Rancho Cucamonga and Liebert Cassidy Whitmore, a Professional Law Corporation. (CITY)D6.Consideration of a Professional Services Agreement with Dapeer Rosenblit Litvak, LLP forLegal Services Related to the Municipal Code and Other Civil Matters. (CITY)D7.Consideration of an Improvement Agreement Extension for Case No. DRC2018­00430,Located East of Vineyard Avenue North of 8th Street, Submitted by Richard Collins Jr. (CITY)D8.Consideration to Accept as Complete, File a Notice of Completion, and Authorize Release ofRetention, and Bonds for the School Crosswalk Improvements Project, Contract No. 2021­054.(CITY)D9.Consideration to Accept as Complete, File the Notice of Completion and Authorize Release ofRetention and Bonds for the Hellman Avenue Sidewalk Improvements and ADA Ramps atVarious Locations, Contract No. 2021­053. (CITY)D10.Consideration to Accept Public Improvements Located in the Village Commercial (VC) Districtof the Victoria Planned Community, South of Attwood Court and West of Victoria Park Lane,Related to Case No. DRC2017­00889, as Complete, File the Notice of Completion, andAuthorize Release of Bonds. (CITY)D11.Consideration of a Resolution to Set Residential Bear Resistant Container Solid Waste RateWithin the City of Rancho Cucamonga. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021­099) (CITY)D12.Consideration of a Resolution Approving an Amendment to the Rancho Cucamonga CityEmployees Association Salary Schedule for Fiscal Year 2021­2022, Including the Addition ofSupervising Traffic Systems Specialist Classification. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021­105) (CITY)D13.Consideration of the Improvement Agreement and Improvement Securities for StreetImprovements, Order Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B, Street LightMaintenance Districts Nos. 1 and 6 for Case No. DRC2020­00026, Located at the SouthwestCorner of 6th Street and Hyssop Drive. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021­101), (RESOLUTION NO.2021­102), (RESOLUTION NO. 2021­103) (CITY)D14.Consideration of Resolutions of the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga FireProtection District, Rancho Cucamonga, California, Amending Resolutions FD 2021­009,2021­010, and 2021­011, and Approving Covenants and Restrictions for Real PropertyPursuant to Government Code Section 54233.5. (RESOLUTION NOS. FD 2021­029, FD2021­030 AND FD 2021­031) (FIRE)D15.Consideration to Adopt a Resolution Approving Side Letter Agreements between the City ofRancho Cucamonga and City Bargaining Units, Including a Part­Time City Employee Benefit.(RESOLUTION NO. 2021­104) (CITY)D16.Consideration to Adopt a Resolution Approving a Side Letter Agreement Between the RanchoCucamonga Fire Protection District and Fire District Bargaining Units, Including a Part­TimeEmployee Benefit Update. (RESOLUTION NO. FD 2021­028). (FIRE)D17.Consideration of an Amendment to the Agreement for Professional Services with SMG­RanchoCucamonga Premier Food Services LLC for Comprehensive Event and Meeting Sales,Management, Catering, and Concession Services for Certain Spaces at the Victoria GardensCultural Center and Lewis Family Playhouse. (CITY) D18.Consideration to Approve Amendment No. 001 to Contract No. 18­121 with KWall, LLC. for Additional Website Development. (CITY) E. CONSENT CALENDAR ORDINANCE(S) ­ SECOND READING/ADOPTION E1.Consideration of Second Reading and Adoption of the Following: Ordinance No.  983 An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, Adopting Municipal Code Amendment DRC2021­00281 to Amend Table 17.26.020­1, Section 17.30.030, Table 17.30.030­1, and Section 17.36.030 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to Establish Three New Zoning Districts and Adopt Associated Development Standards and Permitted Uses for Each New Zoning District, Adopting Zoning Map Amendment DRC2021­00283 to Rezone Certain Parcels as Set Forth Herein, Adopting an Addendum to the General Plan Program Environmental Impact Report Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, and Making Findings in Support Thereof Ordinance No.  984 An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, Approving Planned Community Amendment DRC2021­00284 to Amend the Terra Vista Planned Community to Rezone 13 Parcels to the New Urban Corridor Zoning District, Adopting an Addendum to the General Plan Program Environmental Impact Report Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, and Making Findings in Support Thereof Ordinance No.  985 An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, Adopting Planned Community Amendment DRC2021­00285 to Amend the Victoria Planned Community to Rezone Six Parcels Within the Specific Plan to the New Urban Center Zoning District, Adopting an Addendum to the General Plan Program Environmental Impact Report Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, and Making Findings in Support Thereof F. ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING ITEM(S) G. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM(S) ­ CITY/FIRE DISTRICT G1.8:00 P.M. TIME CERTAIN ­ PUBLIC HEARING #1 ­ Consideration of City Council Election District Boundaries, to Include Discussion Regarding the Redistricting Process, Review of Permissible Criteria to be Considered to Redraw City Council Election District Boundaries, and Receiving Public Input on Communities of Interest and Potential District Boundaries. (CITY) G2.Consideration to Approve the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program Year 2020­ 2021 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER). (CITY) G3.Consideration of a Resolution to Create a Residential Permit Parking District on Estacia Street, Elmhurst Avenue, Stafford Street, Dorset Court, Effen Street, and Cambridge Avenue Between Hermosa Avenue and Ramona Avenue Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 10.50. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021­100) (CITY) H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORT(S) H1.Consideration of a Resolution Proclaiming October 6, 2021, as California Clean Air Day. (RESOLUTION NO 2021­098) (CITY)   I. COUNCIL BUSINESS I1.Consideration of Santa Tour Activities for 2021. (CITY) I2.COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Council Member.) I3.INTER​AGENCY UPDATES (Update by the City Council to the community on the meetings that were attended.) J. CITY ATTORNEY ITEMS K. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING L. ADJOURNMENT CERTIFICATION I, Linda A. Troyan, MMC, City Clerk Services Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify under penalty of perjury that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on at least twenty​four (24) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California; 12505 Cultural Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA, 91739; and on the City's website.  LINDA A. TROYAN, MMC CITY CLERK SERVICES DIRECTOR If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's office at (909) 477­2700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired.  CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT “Our Vision is to build on our success as a world class community,to create an equitable,sustainable,and vibrant city,rich in opportunity for all to thrive.” Page 7 160 192 197 231 241 244 MayorL. Dennis MichaelMayor Pro TemLynne B. KennedyMembers of the CityCouncil:Ryan A. HutchisonKristine D. ScottSam Spagnolo CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGAREGULAR MEETING AGENDASeptember 15, 202110500 Civic Center DriveRancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARD – CITY COUNCILHOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY­ SUCCESSOR AGENCY – PUBLICFINANCE AUTHORITYCLOSED SESSION TRI­COMMUNITIES ROOM 4:30 P.M.REGULAR MEETINGS        COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 P.M.The City Council meets regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in theCouncil Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive.  It Is the Intent to conclude the meeting by 10:00p.m. unless extended by the concurrence of the City Council.  Agendas, minutes, and recordings ofmeetings can be found at www.cityofrc.us or by contacting the City Clerk's Office at 909­774­2023. LiveBroadcast available on Channel 3 (RCTV ­3).CLOSED SESSION – 4:30 P.M.  TRI­COMMUNITIES ROOM ROLL CALL: Mayor Michael                        Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy                        Council Members Hutchison, Scott, and Spagnolo A. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)C. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTSD. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSIOND1.CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR ROBERT NEIUBER, HUMAN RESOURCESDIRECTOR PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54954.2 REGARDING LABOR NEGOTIATIONSWITH THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION (RCCEA), TEAMSTERSLOCAL 1932, RANCHO CUCAMONGA MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENTGROUP, RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIREFIGHTERS LOCAL 2274, FIRE SUPPORT SERVICES ANDFIRE MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES GROUP – (CITY/FIRE)D2.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH(1)    OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: HIMNEL USA, INC. d/b/a ST.MARY'S MONTESSORI SCHOOL AND GLOBAL PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLC VS. CITY OFRANCHO CUCAMONGA, SBSC CASE NO.: CIVDS 2014554. – (CITY)D3.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH(1) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: PEPE’S INC. V. CITY OFRANCHO CUCAMONGA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, CENTRAL DISTRICT OFCALIFORNIA, CASE NO. 5:20CV02506JGBSP – (CITY)D4.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 12467 BASE LINE ROAD IDENTIFIED AS PARCELNUMBERS 1090331030000, 1090331040000, 1089581040000; NEGOTIATING PARTIES JOHNGILLISON, CITY MANAGER REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ANDJOSEPH FILIPPI, JOSEPH FILIPPI WINERY AND VINEYARDS; REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS.– (CITY)D5.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF THE SANSEVAINE CHANNEL, PARALLEL TO TORREY PINE COURT, FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS SANBERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBER 0228­044­24; NEGOTIATINGPARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHOCUCAMONGA, AND CHAO PING YANG, PROPERTY OWNER, REGARDING A PERMANENTEASEMENT FOR MULTI­USE PATH PURPOSES. – CITYD6.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL ­ ANTICIPATED LITIGATION: INITIATION OF LITIGATIONPURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.9: 1 CASE INVOLVING RJM DESIGN GROUP, TOVEY­SCHULTZ CONSTRUCTION, INC.,AND OTHER PARTIES ARISING OUT OF ALLEGED DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION DEFECTS ATTHE RC SPORTS CENTER – CITYD7.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8783 ETIWANDA AVENUE/12949 WHITTRAM AVENUE,FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER0229­162­14; NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER,  AND OVERLAND,PACIFIC AND CUTLER, REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND KULARTRUCK LINE, INC., OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNINGPRICE.  NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SETFORTH ABOVE. – CITYD8.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 9333 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED ASSAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229­162­23; NEGOTIATINGPARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER,  AND OVERLAND, PACIFIC AND CUTLER,REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON,OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTHABOVE. – CITYD9.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8949 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED ASSAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229­162­22; NEGOTIATINGPARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER,  AND OVERLAND, PACIFIC AND CUTLER,REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON,OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTHABOVE. – CITYE. RECESS – Closed Session to Recess to the Regular City Council Meeting at 7:00 P.M. in the CouncilChambers at City Hall, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California.REGULAR MEETING – 7:00 P.M.COUNCIL CHAMBERSPLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCEROLL CALL:Mayor MichaelMayor Pro Tem KennedyCouncil Members Hutchison, Scott, and SpagnoloA. AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDAB. ANNOUNCEMENT / PRESENTATIONSB1.Presentation of Certificate of Recognition Recognizing Delaney Spaulding, Team USA SoftballOlympian and Rancho Cucamonga Resident.B2.Presentation of Proclamations of Recognition to Library Board of Trustees Members Luella G.Hairston, Esq. and Mary Hannah, and Library Foundation Director Heidi Soehnel for Their Service tothe Rancho Cucamonga Public Library. B3.Presentation of a Proclamation Proclaiming the Month of September as Suicide Prevention Month.C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONSMembers of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, SuccessorAgency, and Public Finance Authority. This is the time and place for the general public to addressthe Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public FinancingAuthority Board, and City Council on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits theFire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board,and City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Fire ProtectionDistrict, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Councilmay receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting.Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by theMayor, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to beaddressed directly to the Fire Board, Agencies, Successor Agency, Authority Board, or City Council not to themembers of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected.Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in anyactivity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting.The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of thebusiness portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topiccontained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for thesebusiness items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of theagenda commences. Any other public communications which have not concluded during this one hour periodmay resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed.CONSENT CALENDARS:The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and noncontroversial. They will be actedupon without discussion unless an item is removed by Council Member for discussion.Members of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, andPublic Finance Authority and may act on the consent calendar for those bodies as part of a single motion withthe City Council consent calendar.D. CONSENT CALENDARD1.Consideration of Meeting Minutes for the Regular Meetings of July 21, 2021 and SpecialMeeting of September 1, 2021.D2.Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Bi­Weekly Payroll in the Total Amount of$1,834,980.73 and City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers (Excluding Checks Issued toSouthern California Gas Company) in the Total Amount of $6,633,672.06 Dated August 23,2021 Through September 06, 2021. (CITY/FIRE) ​D3.Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers for Checks Issued toSouthern California Gas Company in the Total Amount of $677,663.21 Dated August 23, 2021Through September 06, 2021. (CITY/FIRE)D4.Consideration of Reimbursement for the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Master Plan DrainageImprovements Program for Fiscal Year 2020/2021 and an Appropriation of $5,394 from theEtiwanda/San Sevaine Drainage Fund (Fund 116). (CITY)D5.Consideration to Approve an Amendment to a Special Services Agreement between the Cityof Rancho Cucamonga and Liebert Cassidy Whitmore, a Professional Law Corporation. (CITY)D6.Consideration of a Professional Services Agreement with Dapeer Rosenblit Litvak, LLP forLegal Services Related to the Municipal Code and Other Civil Matters. (CITY)D7.Consideration of an Improvement Agreement Extension for Case No. DRC2018­00430,Located East of Vineyard Avenue North of 8th Street, Submitted by Richard Collins Jr. (CITY)D8.Consideration to Accept as Complete, File a Notice of Completion, and Authorize Release ofRetention, and Bonds for the School Crosswalk Improvements Project, Contract No. 2021­054.(CITY)D9.Consideration to Accept as Complete, File the Notice of Completion and Authorize Release ofRetention and Bonds for the Hellman Avenue Sidewalk Improvements and ADA Ramps atVarious Locations, Contract No. 2021­053. (CITY)D10.Consideration to Accept Public Improvements Located in the Village Commercial (VC) Districtof the Victoria Planned Community, South of Attwood Court and West of Victoria Park Lane,Related to Case No. DRC2017­00889, as Complete, File the Notice of Completion, andAuthorize Release of Bonds. (CITY)D11.Consideration of a Resolution to Set Residential Bear Resistant Container Solid Waste RateWithin the City of Rancho Cucamonga. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021­099) (CITY)D12.Consideration of a Resolution Approving an Amendment to the Rancho Cucamonga CityEmployees Association Salary Schedule for Fiscal Year 2021­2022, Including the Addition ofSupervising Traffic Systems Specialist Classification. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021­105) (CITY)D13.Consideration of the Improvement Agreement and Improvement Securities for StreetImprovements, Order Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B, Street LightMaintenance Districts Nos. 1 and 6 for Case No. DRC2020­00026, Located at the SouthwestCorner of 6th Street and Hyssop Drive. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021­101), (RESOLUTION NO.2021­102), (RESOLUTION NO. 2021­103) (CITY)D14.Consideration of Resolutions of the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga FireProtection District, Rancho Cucamonga, California, Amending Resolutions FD 2021­009,2021­010, and 2021­011, and Approving Covenants and Restrictions for Real PropertyPursuant to Government Code Section 54233.5. (RESOLUTION NOS. FD 2021­029, FD2021­030 AND FD 2021­031) (FIRE)D15.Consideration to Adopt a Resolution Approving Side Letter Agreements between the City ofRancho Cucamonga and City Bargaining Units, Including a Part­Time City Employee Benefit.(RESOLUTION NO. 2021­104) (CITY)D16.Consideration to Adopt a Resolution Approving a Side Letter Agreement Between the RanchoCucamonga Fire Protection District and Fire District Bargaining Units, Including a Part­TimeEmployee Benefit Update. (RESOLUTION NO. FD 2021­028). (FIRE)D17.Consideration of an Amendment to the Agreement for Professional Services with SMG­RanchoCucamonga Premier Food Services LLC for Comprehensive Event and Meeting Sales,Management, Catering, and Concession Services for Certain Spaces at the Victoria GardensCultural Center and Lewis Family Playhouse. (CITY)D18.Consideration to Approve Amendment No. 001 to Contract No. 18­121 with KWall, LLC. forAdditional Website Development. (CITY)E. CONSENT CALENDAR ORDINANCE(S) ­ SECOND READING/ADOPTIONE1.Consideration of Second Reading and Adoption of the Following:Ordinance No.  983An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, Adopting Municipal Code AmendmentDRC2021­00281 to Amend Table 17.26.020­1, Section 17.30.030, Table 17.30.030­1, and Section 17.36.030 of theRancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to Establish Three New Zoning Districts and Adopt Associated DevelopmentStandards and Permitted Uses for Each New Zoning District, Adopting Zoning Map Amendment DRC2021­00283 toRezone Certain Parcels as Set Forth Herein, Adopting an Addendum to the General Plan Program EnvironmentalImpact Report Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, and Making Findings in Support ThereofOrdinance No.  984An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, Approving Planned CommunityAmendment DRC2021­00284 to Amend the Terra Vista Planned Community to Rezone 13 Parcels to the New UrbanCorridor Zoning District, Adopting an Addendum to the General Plan Program Environmental Impact Report Pursuantto the California Environmental Quality Act, and Making Findings in Support ThereofOrdinance No.  985An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, Adopting Planned CommunityAmendment DRC2021­00285 to Amend the Victoria Planned Community to Rezone Six Parcels Within the SpecificPlan to the New Urban Center Zoning District, Adopting an Addendum to the General Plan Program EnvironmentalImpact Report Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, and Making Findings in Support ThereofF. ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING ITEM(S)G. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM(S) ­ CITY/FIRE DISTRICTG1.8:00 P.M. TIME CERTAIN ­ PUBLIC HEARING #1 ­ Consideration of City Council Election DistrictBoundaries, to Include Discussion Regarding the Redistricting Process, Review of PermissibleCriteria to be Considered to Redraw City Council Election District Boundaries, and Receiving PublicInput on Communities of Interest and Potential District Boundaries. (CITY)G2.Consideration to Approve the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program Year 2020­2021 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER). (CITY)G3.Consideration of a Resolution to Create a Residential Permit Parking District on Estacia Street,Elmhurst Avenue, Stafford Street, Dorset Court, Effen Street, and Cambridge Avenue BetweenHermosa Avenue and Ramona Avenue Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 10.50. (RESOLUTIONNO. 2021­100) (CITY)H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORT(S)H1.Consideration of a Resolution Proclaiming October 6, 2021, as California Clean Air Day.(RESOLUTION NO 2021­098) (CITY)  I. COUNCIL BUSINESSI1.Consideration of Santa Tour Activities for 2021. (CITY)I2.COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Council Member.) I3.INTER​AGENCY UPDATES (Update by the City Council to the community on the meetings that were attended.) J. CITY ATTORNEY ITEMS K. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING L. ADJOURNMENT CERTIFICATION I, Linda A. Troyan, MMC, City Clerk Services Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify under penalty of perjury that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on at least twenty​four (24) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California; 12505 Cultural Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA, 91739; and on the City's website.  LINDA A. TROYAN, MMC CITY CLERK SERVICES DIRECTOR If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's office at (909) 477­2700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired.  CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT “Our Vision is to build on our success as a world class community,to create an equitable,sustainable,and vibrant city,rich in opportunity for all to thrive.” Page 8 --- Etiwanda Pacific Electric Depot National Register of Historic Places Plaque Presentation www.PETrail.org P.O. Box 9451 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Tax ID# 83-0415924 Historic Plaque presented by the Native Sons of the Golden West and Rio Hondo Parlor #294 N.S.G.W. Etiwanda Depot 100th Anniversary 2014 Alta Loma “Bump” to accommodate citrus industry – and transport passengers on the ORIGINAL RED CAR Artist rendering CUCAMONGA CHALLENGE Equestrian Sherriff's attend the CUCAMONGA CHALLENGE Friends with cross country cyclists CHICAGO TO SANTA MONICA Exterior photo of Etiwanda Depot Depot interior looking into ticket office Interior steps to loading dock Depot loading platform Freight landing at Depot Depot waiting room interior doorway Depot truss framework Arched doorway Depot interior Securing the Depot until future restoration RCFD with the Friends of the Pacific Electric Trail post 100th anniversary board up in 2014 Community working together Friends and Volunteers clean up Depot 2014 Community event co-hosted by the Friends of the Pacific Electric Trail (PET) Lapel pin honoring Depot tile emblem designed by Irving Gil Bob Curtis First President of the Friends of the PE Trail Corner view of the Etiwanda Pacific Electric Depot Depot waiting room entrance… “Historic gathering place” waiting to be reimagined….. DRAFT September 1, 2021 City Council Special Meeting Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga | Page 1 of 2 September 1, 2021 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL/FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES The City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council held a Special Meeting on Wednesday, September 1, 2021, in the Tri-Communities Conference Room at City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Mayor Michael called the meeting to order at 2:39 p.m. Present were Councilmembers: Ryan Hutchison, Kristine Scott, Mayor Pro Tem Lynne Kennedy, and Mayor L. Dennis Michael. Absent: Councilmember Sam Spagnolo. Also present were: John Gillison, City Manager; Elisa Cox, Deputy City Manager/Civic and Cultural Services; Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services; Matt Burris, Deputy City Manager/Community and Economic Development; and Linda A. Troyan, City Clerk Services Director. Council Member Spagnolo led the pledge of allegiance. B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS There were no public communications. C. ITEMS OF DISCUSSION C1. Update on the Second Story and Beyond® Capital Project. (Verbal Report) (CITY) Via PowerPoint, Julie Sowles, Library Director, gave an overview of the project, including goals and types of play. Wess Garcia, Deputy Library Director, described the scope and design of the project. John Gillison, City Manager, addressed the project's timeline and funding sources, including a potential Federal budget earmark from a NASA fund. He distributed a letter dated August 19, 2021, from the Rancho Cucamonga Library Foundation Board outlining the Foundation's revised financial commitment to support the annual programming expenses, which will begin after the capital project has concluded. The Library Foundation's original annual commitment was $250,000, and their revised financial commitment outlined in the August 19, 2021 letter totals $625,000 for Fiscal Years 2022- 23 through 2026-27. Extrapolated through Fiscal Year 2029-2030, the difference is expected to total approximately $950,000. The Library Foundation has agreed to the following financial commitment over the next five (5) years: Fiscal Year Amount 2022-23 $ 75,000 2023-24 $100,000 2024-25 $125,000 2025-26 $150,000 2026-27 $175,000 Total $625,000 John Gillison, City Manager, advised to keep on schedule, additional fundraising efforts are needed by the City Council to raise the projected difference in total funding. Since the project will be a regional amenity, contributors can be pursued from larger areas than Rancho Cucamonga, including San Bernardino and Riverside Counties. He has consulted the City Attorney regarding Council fundraising efforts and was advised Council can fundraise for this type of project, but donations would need to be reported as a behested payment. Pam Easter, Member of the Library Foundation Board, acknowledged the Foundation's Fundraising Committee would be interested in working with the City and sharing information. Tim Johnson is the Chair of the Committee. Page 9 DRAFT September 1, 2021 City Council Special Meeting Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga | Page 2 of 2 Council consensus to work as a team and assist the Library Foundation in fundraising efforts for the Second Story and Beyond® Capital Project. Council's fundraising efforts to make up the difference ($950,000) between the Library Foundation's original commitment ($2,250,000) and the projected revised financial commitment ($1,300,000) beginning with Fiscal Year 2022-23 and ending Fiscal Year 2029-30. The next steps include staff working with the Library Subcommittee and a joint City Council and Library Foundation meeting in the future. In response to Council, staff to provide a list of current library donors. C2. Consideration from the City Council / Fire Board to Direct Staff Whether to Proceed with the Feasibility to Construct a 9/11 Memorial. (Verbal Report) (FIRE) Mike McCliman, Deputy Fire Chief, presented a PowerPoint presentation outlining the history and previous design concepts and costs for a permanent 9/11 memorial consisting of steel remnants from the World Trade Center Tower 2. Chief McCliman noted at August 26, 2020, Council meeting when this item was last discussed, Council established a fundraising goal of $150,000 by 9/11/2021, with the City doing outreach to residents on the City's webpage for community feedback and promoting the project and to revisit the item in 2021. Unfortunately, to date, no funds have been raised. Elisa Cox, Deputy City Manager, outlined the three memorial options for the Fire Board's consideration: (1) placement at RCFPD All Risk Training Center, (2) placement at RCFPD Fire Station 178, or (3) donating the steel remnants to another entity. Councilmember Hutchison requested to include a plaque honoring those who passed away in Afghanistan since the war as a result of the 9/11 attack. Mayor Michael and Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy recommended that the plaque not be limited and pay tribute to all past, present, and future. Council consensus for plaque to be timeless. Mayor Michael acknowledged that he spoke to Councilmember Spagnolo could not make this meeting, and he agrees with placement at Fire Station 178. Council consensus to implement staff's recommendation to construct the 9/11 Memorial at Fire Station 178 as follows: Design and funding recommendations: • Design of a less complex concept, including removal of the costly water feature • Budget not to exceed $1 million with joint funding by the City ($300,000) and Fire District ($700,000) • Funding supplemented by community partnerships (ex. Firefighters Association) and sponsorship opportunities (ex. personalized bricks, benches, monument sign) Advantages of this location include: • Centralized location within the City • Increased public accessibility and availability of parking • Construction of Fire Station 178 is scheduled to begin in 2022 • Project can be included as an amendment to the Fire District's design-build contract for Fire Station 178 D. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Michael adjourned the meeting at 4:20 p.m. Respectfully submitted, __________________________________ Linda A. Troyan, MMC City Clerk Services Director Approved: Page 10 DRAFT July 21, 2021 | Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga | Page 1 of 6 July 21, 2021 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCE AUTHORITY AND CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETINGS MINUTES The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a closed session on Wednesday, July 21, 2021, in the Tri- Communities Conference Room at the Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Mayor Michael called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m. Present were Council Members: Ryan Hutchison, Kristine Scott, Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tem Lynne Kennedy, and Mayor L. Dennis Michael. Also present were: John Gillison, City Manager; James L. Markman, City Attorney; Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services; Elisa Cox, Deputy City Manager/Cultural & Civic Services and Matt Burris, Deputy City Manager/Economic and Community Development. A. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) No public communications were made. C. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS None. D. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION D1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (1) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: HIMNEL USA, INC. d/b/a ST. MARY'S MONTESSORI SCHOOL AND GLOBAL PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLC VS. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, SBSC CASE NO.: CIVDS 2014554. – (CITY) D2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (1) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: PEPE’S INC. V. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, CENTRALDISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, CASE NO. 5:20CV02506JGBSP – (CITY) D3. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 12467 BASELINE ROAD IDENTIFIED AS PARCEL NUMBERS 1090331030000, 1090331040000, 1089581040000; NEGOTIATING PARTIES JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND JOSEPH FILIPPI, JOSEPH FILIPPI WINERY AND VINEYARDS; REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS. – (CITY) D4. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE NORTH WEST CORNER OF HAVEN AVENUE AND CIVIC CENTER DRIVE IDENTIFIED AS PARCEL NUMBER 020833140; AND 020833147; NEGOTIATING PARTIES JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER AND MATT BURRIS, DEPUTY CITY MANAGER REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; AND CHRIS HYUN, JRC REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT CORP REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS. (CITY) Page 11 DRAFT July 21, 2021 | Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga | Page 2 of 6 D5. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE SOUTH WEST CORNER OF SAN BERNARDINO RD. AND KLUSMAN ROAD IDENTIFIED AS PARCEL NUMBER 0208-151-24-0000 COMMONLY KNOWN AS 9591 SAN BERNARDINO RD., RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730; NEGOTIATING PARTIES JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND EDUARDO ESPINOZA, CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT; REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS. – CITY E. RECESS The closed session recessed at 6:30 p.m. REGULAR MEETING – 7:00 p.m. CALL TO ORDER – COUNCIL CHAMBERS The regular meetings of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council were held on July 21, 2021, in the Council Chambers at City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Mayor Michael called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Present were Council Members: Ryan Hutchison, Kristine Scott, Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tem Lynne Kennedy, and Mayor L. Dennis Michael. Also present were: John Gillison, City Manager; James L. Markman, City Attorney; and Linda A. Troyan, MMC, Director of City Clerk Services. Council Member Scott led the Pledge of Allegiance. A. AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDA City Clerk Services Director Troyan announced the addition of a new presentation under the Announcements/Presentations section of the agenda. B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS B1. Presentation of a Certificate of Recognition to Rancho Cucamonga Police Department Deputy Joe Silva for Heroically Rescuing a Resident from a Structure Fire. Mayor Michael and Members of the City Council along with Fire Chief Rojer presented Certificates of Recognition to Deputy Joe Silva, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department and Deputy Jamal Warren, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department for heroically rescuing a resident from a structure fire. Mayor Michael also acknowledged the receipt and presented Certificates of Recognition to Deputy Silva and Deputy Warren from State Senator Ochoa Bogh’s office, California’s 23rd District. B2. Presentation of a Certificate of Recognition to Rock Hill Church for their Support and Dedication to Emergency Responders and Hosting the 2021 First Responders Appreciation Celebration. Mayor Michael and Members of the City Council presented Certificates of Recognition to Seth Brown, Worship and Young Adults Pastor and Daniel Foster, Youth Pastor from Rock Hills Church for their support and dedication to Emergency Responders and for hosting the 2021 First Responders Celebration event. Page 12 DRAFT July 21, 2021 | Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga | Page 3 of 6 C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS Janet Walton, displayed a video titled “Americas Anthem”. D. CONSENT CALENDAR D1. Consideration of Meeting Minutes for the Regular Meetings of June 16, 2021. D2. Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Bi-Weekly Payroll in the Total Amount of $1,891,155.22 and City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers (Excluding Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company) in the Total Amount of $2,588,812.06 Dated June 28, 2021 Through July 11, 2021 and City and Fire District Electronic Debit Registers for the Month of June in the Total Amount of $5,771,600.03. (CITY/FIRE) D3. Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers for Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company in the Total Amount of $9,905.20 Dated June 28, 2021 Through July 11, 2021. (CITY/FIRE) D4. Consideration to Receive and File Current Investment Schedules as of June 30, 2021 for the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. (CITY/FIRE) D5. Consideration of Resolutions Approving the Special Tax Levy for Community Facilities District Nos. 85-1 and 88-1 for Fiscal Year 2021/22. (RESOLUTION NO. FD 2021-023, RESOLUTION NO. FD 2021-024) (FIRE) D6. Consideration of a Resolution Adopting an Amendment to the Fire Support Services Association Salary Schedule for Fiscal Year 2021-2022. (RESOLUTION NO. FD 2021-021) (FIRE) D7. Consideration of a Resolution Confirming Unpaid Weed and Fire Hazard Abatement Fees and Authorizing a Special Assessment on Affected Parcels on the Next Tax Roll. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021-080) (CITY) D8. Consideration of a Professional Services Agreement with HdL Coren & Cone for Property Tax Management, Information, and Audit Services. (CITY) D9. Consideration of Amendment No. 13 to the Professional Service Agreement with All City Management Services, Inc. for Crossing Guard Services (CO#13-50) Renewing the Agreement for Fiscal Years 2021/2022 and 2022/2023. (CITY) D10. Consideration of an Offer to Purchase the Real Property Owned by the City Located at the Southerly Terminus of Layton Street South of La Mesa Drive by Cucamonga Valley Water District. (CITY) D11. Recommendation to Reject All Bids Received for the Traffic Signal Modification at Base Line Road and Spruce Avenue Project. (CITY) D12. Consideration of Amendment No. 5 to the Professional Services Agreement with Commercial Cleaning Systems (CO 17-141) for Citywide Janitorial Services in an Amount Not to Exceed $1,038,181 FY 2021/2022. (CITY) D13. Recommendation to Reject All Bids Received for the Central Park Dog Park project. (CITY) Page 13 DRAFT July 21, 2021 | Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga | Page 4 of 6 D14. Consideration of Resolutions Approving the Special Tax Levy for Various Community Facilities Districts and the Special Annual Benefit Assessment for Drainage Area No. 91-2 for Fiscal Year 2021/22. (RESOLUTION NO’S. 2021-063, 2021-064, 2021-065, 2021-066, 2021-067, 2021-068, 2021-069, 2021-070, 2021-071, 2021-072, 2021-073, 2021-074, 2021-075 AND 2021-076) (CITY) MOTION: Moved by Council Member Spagnolo, seconded by Council Member Hutchison, to approve Consent Calendar Items D1 through D14, with Council Member Scott abstaining from item D3 due to her employment with Southern California Gas Company. Motion carried, 5-0. E. CONSENT CALENDAR ORDINANCE(S) ­ SECOND READING/ADOPTION E1. Consideration of Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance No. 982, to be Read by Title Only and Waive Further Reading, Amending Title 17 (Development Code) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to Modify Administrative Procedures within the Development Code and Establish New Zoning Districts, Amend Land Uses and Definitions and Create New Development Standards for Industrial Development within the City. This Item is Exempt from the Requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City’s CEQA Guidelines under CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3) (DRC2021-00170). (ORDINANCE NO. 982) (CITY) City Manager Gillison clarified that the City received two letters from Phelan Development dated July 20th and July 21st which are included as part of the record and on the dais before Council. He has been in discussion with legal counsel regarding a response to their request to meet with Council without staff and legal counsel. As Phelan Development noted in their letter and during staff discussions with them, they continue to make the point that if the Development Code amendment is approved their buildings would no longer be able to be occupied by industrial tenants that would otherwise be allowed to occupy them. This is why they say the Code Amendment is unacceptable. Staff has asked for examples from Phelan Development, but none have been received by the City. Mr. Gillison shared that the City will continue to work with Phelan Development in the future, but their proposal has been that the City’s Code is unacceptable. MOTION: Moved by Council Member Spagnolo, seconded by Council Member Scott, to adopt Ordinance No. 982, by title only and waive full reading. Linda Troyan, City Clerk Services Director read the title of Ordinance No. 982. VOTES NOW CAST ON MOTION: Moved by Council Member Spagnolo, seconded by Council Member Scott, to adopt Ordinance No. 982, by title only and waive full reading. Motion carried 5-0. F. ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING ITEM(S) None. G. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARING ITEM(S) – CITY/FIRE DISTRICT G1. Consideration of a Resolution Adopting the Fire District’s General Fund Final Budget for Fiscal Year 2021/22. (RESOLUTION NO. FD 2021-022) (FIRE) City Manager Gillison provided a Staff Report on Resolution No. FD 2021-022. Page 14 DRAFT July 21, 2021 | Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga | Page 5 of 6 Mayor Michael opened the Public Hearing. No public communications were made. Mayor Michael closed the Public Hearing. MOTION: Moved by Council Member Scott, seconded by Council Member Hutchison to adopt Resolution No. FD 2021-022, adopting the Fire District’s General Fund Final Budget for Fiscal Year 2021/22. Motion carried 5-0. G2. Consideration of Resolutions Confirming the Diagrams and Assessments and Ordering the Levy and Collection of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance Districts; Street Lighting Maintenance Districts; and Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD-85 for Fiscal Year 2021/22. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021-077, RESOLUTION NO. 2021-078, RESOLUTION NO. 2021-079) (CITY) City Manager Gillison introduced Noah Daniels, Deputy Director of Finance, who provided a Staff Report. Mayor Michael opened the Public Hearing. No public communications were made. Mayor Michael closed the Public Hearing. MOTION: Moved by Council Member Hutchison, seconded by Council Member Scott, to adopt Resolution No’s. 2021-077, 2021-078 and 2021-079, confirming the diagrams and assessments and ordering the levy and collection of annual assessments for Landscape Maintenance Districts; Street Lighting Maintenance Districts; and Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD-85 for Fiscal Year 2021/22. Motion carried 5-0. H. CITY MANAGERS STAFF REPORT(S) None. I. COUNCIL BUSINESS I2. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS Mayor Michael congratulated Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy for being selected to serve on the Cal Cities Board of Directors. Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy thanked Mayor Michael and Council Member Spagnolo for their mentorship. I3.INTER­AGENCY UPDATES None. J. CITY ATTORNEY ITEMS None. K. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING None. Page 15 DRAFT July 21, 2021 | Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga | Page 6 of 6 L. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Michael adjourned the meeting at 7:31 p.m. Respectfully submitted, __________________________________ Linda A. Troyan, MMC City Clerk Services Director Approved: Page 16 DATE:September 15, 2021 TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council President and Members of the Boards of Directors FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY:Tamara L. Oatman, Finance Director Veronica Lopez, Accounts Payable Supervisor SUBJECT:Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Bi-Weekly Payroll in the Total Amount of $1,834,980.73 and City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers (Excluding Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company) in the Total Amount of $6,633,672.06 Dated August 23, 2021 Through September 06, 2021. (CITY/FIRE) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends City Council/Board of Directors of the Fire Protection District approve payment of demands as presented. Bi-weekly payroll is $1,063,294.46 and $771,686.27 for the City and the Fire District, respectively. Weekly check register amounts are $6,509,594.36 and $124,077.70 for the City and the Fire District, respectively. BACKGROUND: N/A ANALYSIS: N/A FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate budgeted funds are available for the payment of demands per the attached listing. COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: N/A ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 - Weekly Check Register Page 17 Agenda Check Register RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. AND CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 8/23/2021 through 9/6/2021 Check No.Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00012958 08/24/2021 AHUMADA, ALEXANDER R 0.00 619.50 619.50 AP 00012959 08/24/2021 ALMAND, LLOYD 0.00 619.50 619.50 AP 00012960 08/24/2021 BANTAU, VICTORIA 0.00 505.96 505.96 AP 00012961 08/24/2021 BAZAL, SUSAN 0.00 865.08 865.08 AP 00012962 08/24/2021 BELL, MICHAEL L 0.00 1,929.14 1,929.14 AP 00012963 08/24/2021 BERRY, DAVID 0.00 1,274.32 1,274.32 AP 00012964 08/24/2021 BROCK, ROBIN 0.00 1,274.32 1,274.32 AP 00012965 08/24/2021 CAMPBELL, GERALD 0.00 851.32 851.32 AP 00012966 08/24/2021 CAMPBELL, STEVEN 0.00 619.50 619.50 AP 00012967 08/24/2021 CARNES, KENNETH 0.00 505.96 505.96 AP 00012968 08/24/2021 CLABBY, RICHARD 0.00 1,196.68 1,196.68 AP 00012969 08/24/2021 CLOUGHESY, DONALD R 0.00 2,550.78 2,550.78 AP 00012970 08/24/2021 CORCORAN, ROBERT ANTHONY 0.00 893.07 893.07 AP 00012971 08/24/2021 COSTELLO, DENNIS M 0.00 2,550.78 2,550.78 AP 00012972 08/24/2021 COX, KARL 0.00 619.50 619.50 AP 00012973 08/24/2021 CRANE, RALPH 0.00 619.50 619.50 AP 00012974 08/24/2021 CROSSLAND, WILBUR 0.00 505.96 505.96 AP 00012975 08/24/2021 CURATALO, JAMES 0.00 1,274.32 1,274.32 AP 00012976 08/24/2021 DAGUE, JAMES 0.00 1,246.33 1,246.33 AP 00012977 08/24/2021 DE ANTONIO, SUSAN 0.00 893.07 893.07 AP 00012978 08/24/2021 DEANS, JACKIE 0.00 238.25 238.25 AP 00012979 08/24/2021 DOMINICK, SAMUEL A 0.00 1,274.32 1,274.32 AP 00012980 08/24/2021 EAGLESON, MICHAEL 0.00 1,929.14 1,929.14 AP 00012981 08/24/2021 EGGERS, BOB 0.00 1,246.33 1,246.33 AP 00012982 08/24/2021 FEJERAN, TIM 0.00 1,598.58 1,598.58 AP 00012983 08/24/2021 FRITCHEY, JOHN D 0.00 505.96 505.96 AP 00012984 08/24/2021 HEYDE, DONALD 0.00 619.50 619.50 AP 00012985 08/24/2021 INTERLICCHIA, ROSALYN 0.00 238.25 238.25 AP 00012986 08/24/2021 JERKINS, PATRICK 0.00 1,598.58 1,598.58 AP 00012987 08/24/2021 KILMER, STEPHEN 0.00 1,196.68 1,196.68 AP 00012988 08/24/2021 KIRKPATRICK, WILLIAM M 0.00 903.04 903.04 AP 00012989 08/24/2021 LANE, WILLIAM 0.00 619.50 619.50 AP 00012990 08/24/2021 LARKIN, DAVID W 0.00 1,598.58 1,598.58 AP 00012991 08/24/2021 LEE, ALLAN J 0.00 238.25 238.25 AP 00012992 08/24/2021 LENZE, PAUL E 0.00 1,274.32 1,274.32 AP 00012993 08/24/2021 LONCAR, PHILIP 0.00 1,196.68 1,196.68 AP 00012994 08/24/2021 LONGO, JOE 0.00 181.48 181.48 AP 00012995 08/24/2021 LUTTRULL, DARRELL 0.00 505.96 505.96 AP 00012996 08/24/2021 MACKALL, BEVERLY 0.00 181.48 181.48 AP 00012997 08/24/2021 MAYFIELD, RON 0.00 619.50 619.50 AP 00012998 08/24/2021 MCKEE, JOHN 0.00 619.50 619.50 AP 00012999 08/24/2021 MCNEIL, KENNETH 0.00 619.50 619.50 AP 00013000 08/24/2021 MICHAEL, L. DENNIS 0.00 619.50 619.50 AP 00013001 08/24/2021 MORGAN, BYRON 0.00 1,838.72 1,838.72 AP 00013002 08/24/2021 MYSKOW, DENNIS 0.00 1,196.68 1,196.68 AP 00013003 08/24/2021 NAUMAN, MICHAEL 0.00 505.96 505.96 AP 00013004 08/24/2021 NEE, RON 0.00 865.08 865.08 08:30:50 09/07/2021Current Date:VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page:1 Time:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout User: Report:Page 18 Agenda Check Register RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. AND CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 8/23/2021 through 9/6/2021 Check No.Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00013005 08/24/2021 NELSON, MARY JANE 0.00 181.48 181.48 AP 00013006 08/24/2021 NOREEN, ERIC 0.00 2,550.78 2,550.78 AP 00013007 08/24/2021 O'BRIEN, TOM 0.00 1,379.46 1,379.46 AP 00013008 08/24/2021 PLOUNG, MICHAEL J 0.00 556.94 556.94 AP 00013009 08/24/2021 POST, MICHAEL R 0.00 1,377.34 1,377.34 AP 00013010 08/24/2021 PROULX, PATRICK 0.00 1,274.32 1,274.32 AP 00013011 08/24/2021 REDMOND, MIKE 0.00 619.50 619.50 AP 00013012 08/24/2021 ROBERTS, BRENT 0.00 893.07 893.07 AP 00013013 08/24/2021 ROBERTS, CHERYL L 0.00 2,550.78 2,550.78 AP 00013014 08/24/2021 ROEDER, JEFF 0.00 1,929.14 1,929.14 AP 00013015 08/24/2021 SALISBURY, THOMAS 0.00 619.50 619.50 AP 00013016 08/24/2021 SMITH, RONALD 0.00 505.96 505.96 AP 00013017 08/24/2021 SORENSEN, SCOTT D 0.00 1,873.16 1,873.16 AP 00013018 08/24/2021 SPAGNOLO, SAM 0.00 505.96 505.96 AP 00013019 08/24/2021 SPAIN, WILLIAM 0.00 851.32 851.32 AP 00013020 08/24/2021 SULLIVAN, JAMES 0.00 505.96 505.96 AP 00013021 08/24/2021 TAYLOR, STEVEN 0.00 2,027.69 2,027.69 AP 00013022 08/24/2021 TULEY, TERRY 0.00 1,929.14 1,929.14 AP 00013023 08/24/2021 VANDERKALLEN, FRANCIS 0.00 619.50 619.50 AP 00013024 08/24/2021 VARNEY, ANTHONY 0.00 1,274.32 1,274.32 AP 00013025 08/24/2021 WALTON, KEVIN 0.00 1,598.58 1,598.58 AP 00013026 08/24/2021 YOWELL, TIMOTHY A 0.00 619.50 619.50 AP 00013027 08/25/2021 CALIF GOVERNMENT VEBA / RANCHO CUCAMONGA 25,562.19 0.00 25,562.19 AP 00013028 08/25/2021 ELECNOR BELCO ELECTRIC INC 239,164.88 0.00 239,164.88 AP 00013029 08/25/2021 ESRI 1,701.00 0.00 1,701.00 AP 00013030 08/25/2021 RCCEA 1,589.25 0.00 1,589.25 AP 00013031 08/25/2021 RCPFA 12,722.70 0.00 12,722.70 AP 00013032 08/25/2021 RE ASTORIA 2 LLC 121,865.87 0.00 121,865.87 AP 00013033 08/25/2021 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 71,559.16 0.00 71,559.16 AP 00013034 08/25/2021 RIVERSIDE, CITY OF 6,909.00 0.00 6,909.00 AP 00013035 08/25/2021 SAN BERNARDINO CTY SHERIFFS DEPT 3,712,993.00 0.00 3,712,993.00 AP 00013036 08/25/2021 MOFFATT & NICHOL 184,984.22 0.00 184,984.22 AP 00013037 08/25/2021 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 24,478.48 0.00 24,478.48 AP 00013038 08/26/2021 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 6,549.20 0.00 6,549.20 AP 00013039 08/26/2021 KME FIRE APPARATUS 0.00 370.95 370.95 AP 00013040 08/26/2021 MINUTEMAN PRESS 1,451.17 0.00 1,451.17 ***AP 00013041 08/26/2021 OFFICE DEPOT 3,232.62 50.50 3,283.12 AP 00013042 08/26/2021 GENERATOR SERVICES CO INC 1,905.24 0.00 1,905.24 AP 00013043 08/26/2021 OFFICE DEPOT 1,559.06 0.00 1,559.06 AP 00013044 09/01/2021 BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP 4,380.50 0.00 4,380.50 AP 00013045 09/01/2021 CONFIRE JPA 0.00 408.72 408.72 AP 00013046 09/01/2021 ELECNOR BELCO ELECTRIC INC 32,059.82 0.00 32,059.82 AP 00013047 09/01/2021 ESRI 250.00 0.00 250.00 AP 00013048 09/02/2021 MINUTEMAN PRESS 714.98 0.00 714.98 AP 00013049 09/02/2021 OFFICE DEPOT 4,237.91 0.00 4,237.91 AP 00419648 08/24/2021 RODRIGUEZ, VICTOR 0.00 619.50 619.50 AP 00419649 08/24/2021 TOWNSEND, JAMES 0.00 2,550.78 2,550.78 08:30:50 09/07/2021Current Date:VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page:2 Time:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout User: Report:Page 19 Agenda Check Register RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. AND CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 8/23/2021 through 9/6/2021 Check No.Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00419650 08/24/2021 WALKER, KENNETH 0.00 238.25 238.25 AP 00419651 08/25/2021 ABLE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 6,578.00 0.00 6,578.00 AP 00419652 08/25/2021 ADAPT CONSULTING INC 972.00 0.00 972.00 AP 00419653 08/25/2021 ADVANCED CHEMICAL TRANSPORT INC 1,792.29 0.00 1,792.29 AP 00419654 08/25/2021 AFLAC GROUP INSURANCE 24.58 0.00 24.58 AP 00419655 08/25/2021 AFSS SOUTH 0.00 120.00 120.00 ***AP 00419656 08/25/2021 ALSO ENERGY INC 2,970.00 800.00 3,770.00 AP 00419657 08/25/2021 ALTUM GROUP, THE 5,214.00 0.00 5,214.00 AP 00419658 08/25/2021 AMAXI NUTRITION PRODUCTS 5,000.00 0.00 5,000.00 AP 00419659 08/25/2021 ASCENT ENVIRONMENTAL INC 5,196.25 0.00 5,196.25 AP 00419660 08/25/2021 ATLAS PLANNING SOLUTIONS 2,760.00 0.00 2,760.00 AP 00419661 08/25/2021 AUERBACH POLLOCK FRIEDLANDER 10,500.00 0.00 10,500.00 ***AP 00419662 08/25/2021 AUFBAU CORPORATION 11,770.00 2,310.00 14,080.00 AP 00419663 08/25/2021 BARVALIA, MIHIR 52.04 0.00 52.04 AP 00419664 08/25/2021 BC TRAFFIC SPECIALIST 3,211.54 0.00 3,211.54 AP 00419665 08/25/2021 BILL & WAGS INC 577.50 0.00 577.50 AP 00419666 08/25/2021 BONGARDE HOLDINGS INC 124.25 0.00 124.25 ***AP 00419668 08/25/2021 C V W D 51,775.51 1,544.26 53,319.77 AP 00419669 08/25/2021 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 314.11 0.00 314.11 AP 00419670 08/25/2021 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 127.52 0.00 127.52 AP 00419671 08/25/2021 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 32.26 0.00 32.26 AP 00419672 08/25/2021 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 342.73 0.00 342.73 AP 00419673 08/25/2021 CalPERS LONG-TERM CARE PROGRAM 164.48 0.00 164.48 AP 00419674 08/25/2021 CAMERON-DANIEL PC 1,952.00 0.00 1,952.00 AP 00419675 08/25/2021 CCS ORANGE COUNTY JANITORIAL INC 133,779.88 0.00 133,779.88 AP 00419676 08/25/2021 CHAMI, KHALED 5,000.00 0.00 5,000.00 AP 00419677 08/25/2021 CHAMPION FIRE SYSTEMS INC 630.86 0.00 630.86 AP 00419678 08/25/2021 CHASE BACK BAY LLC 76,879.34 0.00 76,879.34 ***AP 00419679 08/25/2021 CINTAS CORPORATION #150 948.83 397.93 1,346.76 AP 00419680 08/25/2021 CIRCLEPOINT 5,400.00 0.00 5,400.00 AP 00419681 08/25/2021 CIVIC SOLUTIONS INC 13,792.50 0.00 13,792.50 AP 00419682 08/25/2021 COOPER, DARREN 120.93 0.00 120.93 AP 00419683 08/25/2021 CROSBY, TINA 57.00 0.00 57.00 AP 00419684 08/25/2021 DAN GUERRA & ASSOCIATES 28,000.00 0.00 28,000.00 AP 00419685 08/25/2021 DEPARTMENT OF PESTICIDE REGULATION 60.00 0.00 60.00 AP 00419686 08/25/2021 DEPARTMENT OF PESTICIDE REGULATION 60.00 0.00 60.00 AP 00419687 08/25/2021 DIG SAFE BOARD 66.22 0.00 66.22 AP 00419688 08/25/2021 DIG SAFE BOARD 66.22 0.00 66.22 AP 00419689 08/25/2021 E GROUP, THE 450.00 0.00 450.00 AP 00419690 08/25/2021 EXECUTIVE DETAIL SERVICES 0.00 160.00 160.00 AP 00419691 08/25/2021 EXPERIAN 52.00 0.00 52.00 AP 00419692 08/25/2021 EXPRESS BRAKE SUPPLY INC 567.32 0.00 567.32 AP 00419693 08/25/2021 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 56.11 0.00 56.11 AP 00419694 08/25/2021 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 66.24 0.00 66.24 AP 00419695 08/25/2021 FIRSTCARBON SOLUTIONS 3,615.00 0.00 3,615.00 AP 00419696 08/25/2021 FLEETPRIDE 0.00 22.95 22.95 AP 00419697 08/25/2021 FRANKLIN TRUCK PARTS INC 0.00 43.10 43.10 08:30:50 09/07/2021Current Date:VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page:3 Time:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout User: Report:Page 20 Agenda Check Register RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. AND CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 8/23/2021 through 9/6/2021 Check No.Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00419698 08/25/2021 FRASURE, MICHAEL 2,000.00 0.00 2,000.00 AP 00419699 08/25/2021 GLOBALSTAR USA 158.33 0.00 158.33 ***AP 00419700 08/25/2021 GOLDEN STATE RISK MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY 95,321.00 1,232.00 96,553.00 AP 00419701 08/25/2021 GONSALVES & SON, JOE A 3,045.00 0.00 3,045.00 ***AP 00419702 08/25/2021 GRAINGER 363.01 273.80 636.81 AP 00419703 08/25/2021 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC COMPANY INC 1,469.28 0.00 1,469.28 AP 00419704 08/25/2021 HARPER, LAURA 12.89 0.00 12.89 AP 00419705 08/25/2021 HI-LINE ELECTRIC COMPANY 461.70 0.00 461.70 AP 00419706 08/25/2021 HICKS, BRITTANY 60.00 0.00 60.00 AP 00419707 08/25/2021 HINDERLITER DE LLAMAS & ASSOCIATES 37,021.13 0.00 37,021.13 AP 00419708 08/25/2021 HOMECOMING V AT TERRA VISTA LLC 57.79 0.00 57.79 AP 00419709 08/25/2021 HP COMMUNICATIONS INC 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00419710 08/25/2021 HR GREEN PACIFIC INC 18,866.10 0.00 18,866.10 AP 00419711 08/25/2021 INLAND DESERT SECURITY & COMMUNICATIONS INC 58.00 0.00 58.00 AP 00419712 08/25/2021 INLAND PRESORT & MAILING SERVICES 266.17 0.00 266.17 AP 00419713 08/25/2021 INYO NETWORKS 11,119.50 0.00 11,119.50 AP 00419714 08/25/2021 K-K WOODWORKING 27.48 0.00 27.48 AP 00419715 08/25/2021 KENNEDY EQUIPMENT INC 1,021.69 0.00 1,021.69 AP 00419716 08/25/2021 KEYSER MARSTON ASSOCIATES INC 29,227.50 0.00 29,227.50 AP 00419717 08/25/2021 LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS LLC 5,482.10 0.00 5,482.10 AP 00419718 08/25/2021 LOZANO SMITH LLP 6,003.27 0.00 6,003.27 AP 00419719 08/25/2021 MARY MCGRATH ARCHITECTS 0.00 2,750.66 2,750.66 AP 00419720 08/25/2021 MC AVOY & MARKHAM 8,512.25 0.00 8,512.25 AP 00419721 08/25/2021 METROLINK 5,000.00 0.00 5,000.00 AP 00419722 08/25/2021 MIDWEST TAPE 26.52 0.00 26.52 ***AP 00419723 08/25/2021 NAPA AUTO PARTS 170.40 252.88 423.28 AP 00419724 08/25/2021 NEXTECH SYSTEMS INC 382.78 0.00 382.78 AP 00419725 08/25/2021 NOREGON SYSTEMS INC 1,999.00 0.00 1,999.00 AP 00419726 08/25/2021 OMEGA ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES LLC 14,800.00 0.00 14,800.00 AP 00419727 08/25/2021 ONTARIO WINNELSON CO 129.59 0.00 129.59 AP 00419728 08/25/2021 ONWARD ENGINEERING 1,980.00 0.00 1,980.00 AP 00419729 08/25/2021 PACIFIC UTILITY INSTALLATION INC 45,980.00 0.00 45,980.00 AP 00419730 08/25/2021 PANATTONI DEVELOPMENT COMPANY 1,839.00 0.00 1,839.00 AP 00419731 08/25/2021 PATTON SALES CORP 1,114.89 0.00 1,114.89 AP 00419732 08/25/2021 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 561.45 0.00 561.45 AP 00419733 08/25/2021 PIP PRINTING 275.30 0.00 275.30 AP 00419734 08/25/2021 PLACEWORKS 30,010.73 0.00 30,010.73 AP 00419735 08/25/2021 PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 60.17 0.00 60.17 AP 00419736 08/25/2021 PRISTINE UNIFORMS LLC 0.00 336.18 336.18 AP 00419737 08/25/2021 PRO-WEST & ASSOCIATES INC 4,637.81 0.00 4,637.81 AP 00419738 08/25/2021 PROS CONSULTING INC 3,685.00 0.00 3,685.00 AP 00419739 08/25/2021 QUADIENT-4715 50,000.00 0.00 50,000.00 AP 00419740 08/25/2021 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 3,166.00 0.00 3,166.00 AP 00419741 08/25/2021 RANCHO SMOG CENTER 44.95 0.00 44.95 AP 00419742 08/25/2021 RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 8.08 0.00 8.08 AP 00419743 08/25/2021 REFRIGERATION SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTOR 602.33 0.00 602.33 AP 00419744 08/25/2021 REYES, DAVID 330.00 0.00 330.00 08:30:50 09/07/2021Current Date:VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page:4 Time:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout User: Report:Page 21 Agenda Check Register RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. AND CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 8/23/2021 through 9/6/2021 Check No.Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00419745 08/25/2021 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT 331.56 0.00 331.56 AP 00419746 08/25/2021 SBPEA 2,409.15 0.00 2,409.15 AP 00419747 08/25/2021 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 100.00 0.00 100.00 AP 00419748 08/25/2021 SHRED PROS 225.00 0.00 225.00 AP 00419756 08/25/2021 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 26,241.99 0.00 26,241.99 AP 00419757 08/25/2021 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 63.40 0.00 63.40 AP 00419758 08/25/2021 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 30.78 0.00 30.78 ***AP 00419759 08/25/2021 STANLEY PEST CONTROL 2,110.00 740.00 2,850.00 AP 00419760 08/25/2021 TEASKY 2 LLC 518.94 0.00 518.94 AP 00419761 08/25/2021 TIREHUB LLC 1,443.85 0.00 1,443.85 AP 00419762 08/25/2021 TORO TOWING 120.00 0.00 120.00 AP 00419763 08/25/2021 TYRA, MARIE 480.00 0.00 480.00 AP 00419764 08/25/2021 UNDERGROUND SVC ALERT OF SO CAL 123.85 0.00 123.85 AP 00419765 08/25/2021 UNDERGROUND SVC ALERT OF SO CAL 122.20 0.00 122.20 AP 00419766 08/25/2021 UPS 62.06 0.00 62.06 AP 00419767 08/25/2021 VIRGIN PULSE INC 1,087.20 0.00 1,087.20 ***AP 00419768 08/25/2021 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 2,525.61 1,818.09 4,343.70 AP 00419769 08/25/2021 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 5,495.12 0.00 5,495.12 AP 00419770 08/25/2021 WESTERN STATES TRANSMISSIONS 309.09 0.00 309.09 AP 00419771 08/25/2021 WILSON & BELL AUTO SERVICE 2,003.45 0.00 2,003.45 AP 00419772 08/25/2021 WINZER CORPORATION 0.00 163.12 163.12 AP 00419773 08/25/2021 XIAO, YIHUI 500.00 0.00 500.00 ***AP 00419774 08/25/2021 AUFBAU CORPORATION 35,745.00 7,685.00 43,430.00 AP 00419775 08/25/2021 CHINO MOWER & ENGINE SERVICE 637.90 0.00 637.90 AP 00419776 08/25/2021 CURTIS J DAHLE ARCHITECT 6,118.00 0.00 6,118.00 AP 00419777 08/25/2021 DELL MARKETING LP 4,247.39 0.00 4,247.39 AP 00419778 08/25/2021 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, CALIF 11,066.69 0.00 11,066.69 AP 00419779 08/25/2021 ECS IMAGING INC 10,600.00 0.00 10,600.00 AP 00419780 08/25/2021 GRAINGER 541.18 0.00 541.18 AP 00419781 08/25/2021 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC COMPANY INC 778.26 0.00 778.26 AP 00419782 08/25/2021 ITERIS INC 2,792.00 0.00 2,792.00 AP 00419783 08/25/2021 LANDSCAPE WEST MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC 13,143.23 0.00 13,143.23 AP 00419784 08/25/2021 MARIPOSA LANDSCAPES INC 1,366.92 0.00 1,366.92 AP 00419785 08/25/2021 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 118.23 0.00 118.23 AP 00419786 08/25/2021 MVC ENTERPRISES INC 27,261.41 0.00 27,261.41 AP 00419787 08/25/2021 NV5 INC 6,075.78 0.00 6,075.78 AP 00419788 08/25/2021 PARS 3,500.00 0.00 3,500.00 AP 00419789 08/25/2021 REACH MEDIA NETWORK 1,379.70 0.00 1,379.70 AP 00419790 08/25/2021 RMUS LLC 0.00 1,414.07 1,414.07 AP 00419791 08/25/2021 RODELO, RHEA 327.50 0.00 327.50 AP 00419792 08/25/2021 SAFETY KLEEN SYSTEMS INC 383.60 0.00 383.60 AP 00419794 08/25/2021 TIREHUB LLC 798.77 0.00 798.77 AP 00419795 08/25/2021 UNITY COURIER SERVICE INC 1,143.00 0.00 1,143.00 AP 00419796 08/25/2021 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 1,329.87 0.00 1,329.87 AP 00419797 08/25/2021 YORK RISK SERVICES GROUP INC 15,070.00 0.00 15,070.00 AP 00419798 08/26/2021 DANCE TERRIFIC 840.00 0.00 840.00 AP 00419799 08/26/2021 HAMILTON, MONIQUE 268.80 0.00 268.80 08:30:50 09/07/2021Current Date:VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page:5 Time:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout User: Report:Page 22 Agenda Check Register RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. AND CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 8/23/2021 through 9/6/2021 Check No.Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00419800 08/26/2021 INTERWEST CONSULTING GROUP INC 3,502.48 0.00 3,502.48 AP 00419801 08/26/2021 JOHNNY ALLEN TENNIS ACADEMY 2,800.80 0.00 2,800.80 AP 00419802 08/26/2021 MARSHALL, SYLVIA 564.00 0.00 564.00 AP 00419803 08/31/2021 RANCHO PARTNERS LLC 4,000.00 0.00 4,000.00 AP 00419804 08/31/2021 XIDI INC 16,000.00 0.00 16,000.00 AP 00419805 09/01/2021 AFLAC GROUP INSURANCE 4,311.14 0.00 4,311.14 AP 00419806 09/01/2021 AFLAC GROUP INSURANCE 6,466.71 0.00 6,466.71 AP 00419807 09/01/2021 ALTA VISTA MOBILE HOME PARK 297.59 0.00 297.59 AP 00419808 09/01/2021 AM-TEC TOTAL SECURITY INC 1,445.00 0.00 1,445.00 AP 00419809 09/01/2021 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 153.00 0.00 153.00 AP 00419810 09/01/2021 BERLITZ LANGUAGES INC 65.00 0.00 65.00 AP 00419811 09/01/2021 BOOT BARN INC 6,524.40 0.00 6,524.40 AP 00419812 09/01/2021 BRAUN BLAISING SMITH WYNNE 607.07 0.00 607.07 AP 00419813 09/01/2021 C P GENERATOR INC 301.70 0.00 301.70 AP 00419814 09/01/2021 C V W D 744.20 0.00 744.20 ***AP 00419821 09/01/2021 C V W D 195,528.86 70.52 195,599.38 AP 00419822 09/01/2021 CA LLC - ALTA LAGUNA MHP 400.00 0.00 400.00 AP 00419823 09/01/2021 CASA VOLANTE MOBILE HOME PARK 600.00 0.00 600.00 AP 00419824 09/01/2021 CASTANEDA, MIGUEL 2,300.00 0.00 2,300.00 AP 00419825 09/01/2021 CCS ORANGE COUNTY JANITORIAL INC 63,773.50 0.00 63,773.50 AP 00419826 09/01/2021 CHAMPION FIRE SYSTEMS INC 492.00 0.00 492.00 AP 00419827 09/01/2021 CHAPARRAL HEIGHTS MOBILE HOME PARK 300.00 0.00 300.00 ***AP 00419828 09/01/2021 CINTAS CORPORATION #150 2,967.86 206.75 3,174.61 AP 00419829 09/01/2021 CLERK OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS 0.00 2,530.25 2,530.25 AP 00419830 09/01/2021 COMPETITION ROOFING INC 492.31 0.00 492.31 AP 00419831 09/01/2021 D & K CONCRETE COMPANY 4,663.98 0.00 4,663.98 AP 00419832 09/01/2021 DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS 225.00 0.00 225.00 AP 00419833 09/01/2021 DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS 225.00 0.00 225.00 AP 00419834 09/01/2021 DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS 225.00 0.00 225.00 AP 00419835 09/01/2021 DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS 225.00 0.00 225.00 AP 00419836 09/01/2021 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 160.00 0.00 160.00 AP 00419837 09/01/2021 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, CALIF 23,000.00 0.00 23,000.00 ***AP 00419838 09/01/2021 FRONTIER COMM 2,425.58 730.56 3,156.14 AP 00419839 09/01/2021 FS CONTRACTORS INC 194,288.77 0.00 194,288.77 AP 00419840 09/01/2021 FUEL SERV 475.00 0.00 475.00 AP 00419841 09/01/2021 GIORDANO, MARIANNA 231.00 0.00 231.00 AP 00419842 09/01/2021 GONZALEZ, JANINE P 138.31 0.00 138.31 AP 00419843 09/01/2021 GRACIANO, TAMMIE 0.00 37.71 37.71 AP 00419844 09/01/2021 GRAINGER 1,216.74 0.00 1,216.74 AP 00419845 09/01/2021 GROVES ON FOOTHILL, THE 200.00 0.00 200.00 AP 00419846 09/01/2021 GUZMAN, ANDREA 102.00 0.00 102.00 AP 00419847 09/01/2021 HAIFLEY, ROXANN 132.00 0.00 132.00 AP 00419848 09/01/2021 HENDERSON, JONATHAN 100.00 0.00 100.00 AP 00419849 09/01/2021 HMC ARCHITECTS 2,100.00 0.00 2,100.00 AP 00419850 09/01/2021 HOMETOWN AMERICA RAMONA VILLA 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00419851 09/01/2021 HOUSE OF RUTH INC 9,596.09 0.00 9,596.09 AP 00419852 09/01/2021 INLAND VALLEY COUNCIL OF CHURCHES 9,202.00 0.00 9,202.00 08:30:50 09/07/2021Current Date:VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page:6 Time:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout User: Report:Page 23 Agenda Check Register RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. AND CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 8/23/2021 through 9/6/2021 Check No.Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00419853 09/01/2021 JIA, XU 63.00 0.00 63.00 AP 00419854 09/01/2021 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK N.A.130.86 0.00 130.86 AP 00419855 09/01/2021 K-K WOODWORKING 1,221.29 0.00 1,221.29 AP 00419856 09/01/2021 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN INC 244,837.34 0.00 244,837.34 AP 00419857 09/01/2021 MAGELLAN ADVISORS LLC 12,000.00 0.00 12,000.00 AP 00419858 09/01/2021 MCI 73.44 0.00 73.44 AP 00419859 09/01/2021 MICHELLE BEASON 677.00 0.00 677.00 AP 00419860 09/01/2021 NAPA AUTO PARTS 0.00 133.36 133.36 AP 00419861 09/01/2021 NATIONAL UTILITY LOCATORS LLC 1,740.00 0.00 1,740.00 AP 00419862 09/01/2021 NBS 1,500.00 0.00 1,500.00 AP 00419863 09/01/2021 NEW IMAGE COMMERCIAL FLOORING 1,650.00 0.00 1,650.00 AP 00419864 09/01/2021 PINES MOBILE HOME PARK, THE 100.00 0.00 100.00 AP 00419865 09/01/2021 PINNACLE PETROLEUM INC 31,960.15 0.00 31,960.15 AP 00419866 09/01/2021 PRISTINE UNIFORMS LLC 0.00 348.05 348.05 AP 00419867 09/01/2021 PUBLICINPUT.COM 31,750.00 0.00 31,750.00 AP 00419868 09/01/2021 RANCHO CUCAMONGA QUAKES 2,165.00 0.00 2,165.00 AP 00419869 09/01/2021 RANCHO SMOG CENTER 44.95 0.00 44.95 AP 00419870 09/01/2021 RED WING BUSINESS ADVANTAGE ACCOUNT 3,549.09 0.00 3,549.09 AP 00419871 09/01/2021 SAFE-ENTRY TECHNICAL INC 0.00 735.00 735.00 AP 00419872 09/01/2021 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 0.00 12,181.12 12,181.12 AP 00419873 09/01/2021 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 0.00 120.00 120.00 AP 00419874 09/01/2021 SAN BERNARDINO CTY FIRE DEPT 63,926.72 0.00 63,926.72 AP 00419875 09/01/2021 SAN BERNARDINO SHERIFF'S RODEO COMMITTEE 400.00 0.00 400.00 ***AP 00419876 09/01/2021 SHEAKLEY PENSION ADMINISTRATION 460.15 178.15 638.30 AP 00419877 09/01/2021 SHOETERIA INC 3,207.84 0.00 3,207.84 ***AP 00419878 09/01/2021 SHRED PROS 950.00 63.00 1,013.00 AP 00419881 09/01/2021 SOUND IMAGE INC 88,835.00 0.00 88,835.00 ***AP 00419884 09/01/2021 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 3,953.34 2,403.14 6,356.48 AP 00419885 09/01/2021 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 39.23 0.00 39.23 AP 00419886 09/01/2021 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 42.86 0.00 42.86 AP 00419887 09/01/2021 STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY 11,774.30 0.00 11,774.30 AP 00419888 09/01/2021 STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY 3,436.02 0.00 3,436.02 AP 00419889 09/01/2021 STERLING COFFEE SERVICE 560.45 0.00 560.45 AP 00419890 09/01/2021 SUN BADGE CO 0.00 116.33 116.33 AP 00419891 09/01/2021 SYCAMORE VILLA MOBILE HOME PARK 400.00 0.00 400.00 AP 00419892 09/01/2021 UNITED WAY 45.00 0.00 45.00 AP 00419893 09/01/2021 UPS 33.00 0.00 33.00 AP 00419894 09/01/2021 UPSCO POWERSAFE SYSTEMS INC 0.00 600.00 600.00 AP 00419895 09/01/2021 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 0.00 5,191.43 5,191.43 AP 00419896 09/01/2021 VISION COMMUNICATIONS CO 1,980.00 0.00 1,980.00 AP 00419897 09/01/2021 VOLGISTICS INC 8,184.00 0.00 8,184.00 AP 00419898 09/01/2021 VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY 1,217.43 0.00 1,217.43 AP 00419899 09/01/2021 WALLACE, LATOYA T 146.00 0.00 146.00 AP 00419900 09/01/2021 WANG, KAI 206.01 0.00 206.01 ***AP 00419901 09/01/2021 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 730.78 442.28 1,173.06 AP 00419902 09/01/2021 WILSON & BELL AUTO SERVICE 287.50 0.00 287.50 AP 00419903 09/01/2021 XEROX FINANCIAL SERVICES 298.38 0.00 298.38 08:30:50 09/07/2021Current Date:VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page:7 Time:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout User: Report:Page 24 Agenda Check Register RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. AND CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 8/23/2021 through 9/6/2021 Check No.Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00419904 09/01/2021 YOUNG, JOANNE 256.00 0.00 256.00 AP 00419905 09/01/2021 YU, XIAOYI 8.71 0.00 8.71 $6,509,594.36 $6,633,672.06 $124,077.70 Note: Grand Total: Total Fire: Total City: *** Check Number includes both City and Fire District expenditures 08:30:50 09/07/2021Current Date:VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page:8 Time:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout User: Report:Page 25 DATE:September 15, 2021 TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council President and Members of the Boards of Directors FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY:Tamara L. Oatman, Finance Director Veronica Lopez, Accounts Payable Supervisor SUBJECT:Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers for Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company in the Total Amount of $677,663.21 Dated August 23, 2021 Through September 06, 2021. (CITY/FIRE) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends City Council/Board of Directors of the Fire Protection District approve payment of demands as presented. Weekly check register amounts are $677,009.96 and $653.25 for the City and the Fire District, respectively. BACKGROUND: N/A ANALYSIS: N/A FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate budgeted funds are available for the payment of demands per the attached listing. COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: N/A ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 - Weekly Check Register Page 26 Agenda Check Register RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT So Calif Gas Company Only. AND CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 8/23/2021 through 9/6/2021 Check No.Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount ***AP 00419749 08/25/2021 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 7,692.28 531.86 8,224.14 AP 00419793 08/25/2021 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 667,496.22 0.00 667,496.22 ***AP 00419879 09/01/2021 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 600.90 121.39 722.29 AP 00419880 09/01/2021 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 1,220.56 0.00 1,220.56 $677,009.96 $677,663.21 $653.25 Note: Grand Total: Total Fire: Total City: *** Check Number includes both City and Fire District expenditures 08:33:51 09/07/2021Current Date:VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page:1 Time:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout User: Report:Page 27 DATE:September 15, 2021 TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY:Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Annette Cano-Soza, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT:Consideration of Reimbursement for the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Master Plan Drainage Improvements Program for Fiscal Year 2020/2021 and an Appropriation of $5,394 from the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Drainage Fund (Fund 116). (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council approve a reimbursement for the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Master Plan Drainage Improvements Program for Fiscal Year 2020/2021 and an appropriation of $5,394 from the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Drainage Fund (Fund 116). BACKGROUND: Developers that are conditioned by the City to construct master planned drainage facilities in connection with a development project may enter into a Development Reimbursement Agreement (Agreement) with the City. The Agreement provides for annual reimbursements for up to ten (10) years from the effective date of the Agreement. Per the terms of the Agreement, the amount available for reimbursement each year is fifty percent (50%) of the fees collected in the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Drainage Fee Program the prior fiscal year. These funds are distributed to developers with active Agreements proportionally based on the original amount of each Agreement. Any remaining balance due is then rolled over to the next fiscal year. When the Agreement expires any remaining balance is waived. ANALYSIS: Agreement No. DRA-41 for Tract 16716, developer JT Storm Development, LLC has a total outstanding balance due of $88,158 for eligible improvements constructed as part of the tract’s development. The reimbursement proposed under this item will be the final payment to JT Storm Development LLC under DRA-41 as this agreement expired June 2021. No drainage fees were collected for Fiscal Year 2019/2020 and a total of $10,788 was collected for Fiscal Year 2020/2021 for the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Drainage Fee Program of which $5,394 is available for reimbursement. The following table contains the recommended reimbursement and final payment: Page 28 Page 2 9 3 4 Agmt No. Expiration Yr. Project/Developer Original Agmt. Amount Fractional Share Previous Balance (2018/2019) Recommended Reimbursement Amount (2020/2021) Remaining Balance DRA-41 2021 TR 16716/JT STORM $270,423 1.00 $88,157.89 $5,394 0* * Note: Remaining Balance reduced to $0 with the expiration of the reimbursement agreement. FISCAL IMPACT: Since the amount available for reimbursement under this program is determined after the City’s financial books are closed each fiscal year, the funds needed for reimbursement are not included in the annual budget. Therefore, staff is recommending an appropriation in the amount of $5,394 from the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Drainage Fund (Fund 116) to Account No. 1116303-5650/1026116-0 to cover the amount of the recommended reimbursement/final payment. COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: Construction of master planned drainage improvements aids in implementing the City Council’s vision to build a world class community by constructing improvements that reduce the potential for flooding and allow for well planned development. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 - Vicinity Map Page 29 ATTACHMENT 1 1 6 0 8 TR 16716 Vicinity Map NOT TO SCALE SD LineSD LineTR 16716 PE Trail Page 30 DATE:September 15, 2021 TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY:Robert Neiuber, Human Resources Director Lucy Alvarez-Nunez, Management Analyst I SUBJECT:Consideration to Approve an Amendment to a Special Services Agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Liebert Cassidy Whitmore, a Professional Law Corporation. (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council approve an amendment to a special services agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Liebert Cassidy Whitmore, a professional law corporation. BACKGROUND: The law firm of Liebert Cassidy Whitmore (LCW) is a highly respected state-wide authority on public sector labor and employment law. LCW provides the City with specialized legal services including consulting, representational, and legal services in the areas of labor relations and employment law. The City has an existing contract with Liebert Cassidy Whitmore. This contract was approved by City Council in 2007. ANALYSIS: The City’s existing contract with LCW is in need of updating. Recently, LCW proposed an updated agreement along with an adjustment to the range of hourly rates. The attached agreement reflects the updated terms and conditions to include an adjustment to billing rates and fees. Rates will be going up about $5 per hour. The last rate increase to hourly rates was in 2019. Staff recommends the City Council approve the amended agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Liebert Cassidy Whitmore to include the aforementioned updates. FISCAL IMPACT: Adjustment to billing rates and fees will result in an increase of approximately $3,200 for fiscal year 2021/22. COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: This item addresses the Council’s core value of working together cooperatively and respectfully Page 31 Page 2 7 1 0 with each other, staff, and all stakeholders. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 – Professional Services Agreement Attachment 2 – Professional Services Agreement Addendum Attachment 3 – Liebert Cassidy Whitmore Special Services Agreement Page 32 ____________ Vendor Initials PSA with professional liability insurance (Design) Page 1 Last Revised: 10/2/13 AGREEMENT FOR DESIGN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 21st day of June, 2021, by and between the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation (“City”) and Liebert Cassidy Whitmore, a Professional Corporation (“Consultant”). RECITALS A.City has heretofore issued its request for proposals to perform the following design professional services: As described in Exhibit A - Agreement for Special Services (“the Project”). B.Consultant has submitted a proposal to perform the professional services described in Recital “A”, above, necessary to complete the Project. C.City desires to engage Consultant to complete the Project in the manner set forth and more fully described herein. D.Consultant represents that it is fully qualified and licensed under the laws of the State of California to perform the services contemplated by this Agreement in a good and professional manner. AGREEMENT NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of performance by the parties of the mutual promises, covenants, and conditions herein contained, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1.Consultant’s Services. 1.1 Scope and Level of Services. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement, City hereby engages Consultant to perform all technical and design professional services described in Recitals “A” and “B” above, including, but not limited to Exhibit A, all as more fully set forth in the Consultant’s proposal, dated June 21, 2021 and entitled “Scope of Work”, attached hereto as Exhibit “A”, and incorporated by reference herein. The nature, scope, and level of the services required to be performed by Consultant are set forth in the Scope of Work and are referred to herein as “the Services.” In the event of any inconsistencies between the Scope of Work and this Agreement, the terms and provisions of this Agreement shall control. 1.2 Revisions to Scope of Work. Upon request of the City, the Consultant will promptly meet with City staff to discuss any revisions to the Project desired ATTACHMENT 1 Page 33 ____________ Vendor Initials PSA with professional liability insurance (Design) Page 2 Last Revised: 10/2/13 by the City. Consultant agrees that the Scope of Work may be amended based upon said meetings, and, by amendment to this Agreement, the parties may agree on a revision or revisions to Consultant’s compensation based thereon. A revision pursuant to this Section that does not increase the total cost payable to Consultant by more than ten percent (10%) of the total compensation specified in Section 3, may be approved in writing by City’s City Manager without amendment. 1.3 Time for Performance. Consultant shall perform all services under this Agreement in a timely, regular basis consistent with industry standards for professional skill and care, and in accordance with any schedule of performance set forth in the Scope of Work, or as set forth in a “Schedule of Performance”, if such Schedule is attached hereto as Exhibit “A”. 1.4 Standard of Care. As a material inducement to City to enter into this Agreement, Consultant hereby represents that it has the experience necessary to undertake the services to be provided. In light of such status and experience, Consultant hereby covenants that it shall follow the customary professional standards in performing the Services. 1.5 Familiarity with Services. By executing this Agreement, Consultant represents that, to the extent required by the standard of practice, Consultant (a) has investigated and considered the scope of services to be performed, (b) has carefully considered how the services should be performed, and (c) understands the facilities, difficulties and restrictions attending performance of the services under this Agreement. Consultant represents that Consultant, to the extent required by the standard of practice, has investigated any areas of work, as applicable, and is reasonably acquainted with the conditions therein. Should Consultant discover any latent or unknown conditions, which will materially affect the performance of services, Consultant shall immediately inform City of such fact and shall not proceed except at Consultant’s risk until written instructions are received from the City Representative. 2. Term of Agreement. The term of this Agreement shall be one year(s) and shall become effective as of the date of the mutual execution by way of both parties signature (the “Effective Date”). No work shall be conducted; service or goods will not be provided until this Agreement has been executed and requirements have been fulfilled. Parties to this Agreement shall have the option to renew in one year(s) increments to a total of three (3) years, unless sooner terminated as provided in Section 14 herein. Options to renew are contingent upon the City Manager’s approval, subject to pricing review, and in accordance to all Terms and Conditions stated herein unless otherwise provided in writing by the City. Page 34 ____________ Vendor Initials PSA with professional liability insurance (Design) Page 3 Last Revised: 10/2/13 3. Compensation. 3.1 Compensation. City shall compensate Consultant as set forth in Exhibit A, provided, however, that full, total and complete amount payable to Consultant shall not exceed $380.00 per hour for Attorney time (three hundred and eighty hours), including all out of pocket expenses, unless additional compensation is approved by the City Manager or City Council. City shall not withhold any federal, state or other taxes, or other deductions. However, City shall withhold not more than ten percent (10%) of any invoice amount pending receipt of any deliverables reflected in such invoice. Under no circumstance shall Consultant be entitled to compensation for services not yet satisfactorily performed. The parties further agree that compensation may be adjusted in accordance with Section 1.2 to reflect subsequent changes to the Scope of Services. City shall compensate Consultant for any authorized extra services as set forth in Exhibit A. 4. Method of Payment. 4.1 Invoices. Consultant shall submit to City monthly invoices for the Services performed pursuant to this Agreement. The invoices shall describe in detail the Services rendered during the period and shall separately describe any authorized extra services. Any invoice claiming compensation for extra services shall include appropriate documentation of prior authorization of such services. All invoices shall be remitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. 4.2 City shall review such invoices and notify Consultant in writing within ten (10) business days of any disputed amounts. 4.3 City shall pay all undisputed portions of the invoice within thirty (30) calendar days after receipt of the invoice up to the not-to-exceed amounts set forth in Section 3. 4.4 All records, invoices, time cards, cost control sheets and other records maintained by Consultant relating to services hereunder shall be available for review and audit by the City. 5. Representatives. 5.1 City Representative. For the purposes of this Agreement, the contract administrator and City’s representative shall be Human Resources Director, Robert Neiuber, or such other person as designated in writing by the City (“City Representative”). It shall be Consultant’s responsibility to assure that the City Representative is kept informed of the progress of the performance of the services, and Page 35 ____________ Vendor Initials PSA with professional liability insurance (Design) Page 4 Last Revised: 10/2/13 Consultant shall refer any decisions that must be made by City to the City Representative. Unless otherwise specified herein, any approval of City required hereunder shall mean the approval of the City Representative. 5.2 Consultant Representative. For the purposes of this Agreement, J. Scott Tiedemann, Managing Partner is hereby designated as the principal and representative of Consultant authorized to act in its behalf with respect to the services specified herein and make all decisions in connection therewith (“Consultant’s Representative”). It is expressly understood that the experience, knowledge, capability and reputation of the Consultant’s Representative were a substantial inducement for City to enter into this Agreement. Therefore, the Consultant’s Representative shall be responsible during the term of this Agreement for directing all activities of Consultant and devoting sufficient time to personally supervise the services hereunder. Consultant may not change the Responsible Principal without the prior written approval of City. 6. Consultant’s Personnel. 6.1 All Services shall be performed by Consultant or under Consultant’s direct supervision, and all personnel shall possess the qualifications, permits, and licenses required by State and local law to perform such Services, including, without limitation, a City business license as required by the City’s Municipal Code. 6.2 Consultant shall be solely responsible for the satisfactory work performance of all personnel engaged in performing the Services and compliance with the standard of care set forth in Section 1.4. 6.3 Consultant shall be responsible for payment of all employees’ and subcontractors’ wages and benefits, and shall comply with all requirements pertaining to employer’s liability, workers’ compensation, unemployment insurance, and Social Security. By its execution of this Agreement, Consultant certifies that it is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code that require every employer to be insured against liability for Worker's Compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and agrees to comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the Services. 6.4 Consultant shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless City and its elected officials, officers and employees, servants, designated volunteers, and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials, from any and all liability, damages, claims, costs and expenses of any nature to the extent arising from Consultant’s violations of personnel practices and/or any violation of the California Labor Code. City shall have the right to offset against the amount of any fees due to Consultant under this Agreement any amount due to City from Consultant as a result of Consultant’s failure to promptly pay to City any reimbursement or indemnification arising under this Section 6. Page 36 ____________ Vendor Initials PSA with professional liability insurance (Design) Page 5 Last Revised: 10/2/13 7. Ownership of Work Product. 7.1 Ownership. All documents, ideas, concepts, electronic files, drawings, photographs and any and all other writings, including drafts thereof, prepared, created or provided by Consultant in the course of performing the Services, including any and all intellectual and proprietary rights arising from the creation of the same (collectively, “Work Product”), are considered to be “works made for hire” for the benefit of the City. Upon payment being made, and provided Consultant is not in breach of this Agreement, all Work Product shall be and remain the property of City without restriction or limitation upon its use or dissemination by City. Basic survey notes, sketches, charts, computations and similar data prepared or obtained by Consultant under this Agreement shall, upon request, be made available to City. None of the Work Product shall be the subject of any common law or statutory copyright or copyright application by Consultant. In the event of the return of any of the Work Product to Consultant or its representative, Consultant shall be responsible for its safe return to City. Under no circumstances shall Consultant fail to deliver any draft or final designs, plans, drawings, reports or specifications to City upon written demand by City for their delivery, notwithstanding any disputes between Consultant and City concerning payment, performance of the contract, or otherwise. This covenant shall survive the termination of this Agreement. City’s reuse of the Work Product for any purpose other than the Project, shall be at City’s sole risk. 7.2. Assignment of Intellectual Property Interests: Upon execution of this Agreement and to the extent not otherwise conveyed to City by Section 7.1, above, the Consultant shall be deemed to grant and assign to City, and shall require all of its subcontractors to assign to City, all ownership rights, and all common law and statutory copyrights, trademarks, and other intellectual and proprietary property rights relating to the Work Product and the Project itself, and Consultant shall disclaim and retain no rights whatsoever as to any of the Work Product, to the maximum extent permitted by law. City shall be entitled to utilize the Work Product for any and all purposes, including but not limited to constructing, using, maintaining, altering, adding to, restoring, rebuilding and publicizing the Project or any aspect of the Project. 7.3 Title to Intellectual Property. Consultant warrants and represents that it has secured all necessary licenses, consents or approvals to use any instrumentality, thing or component as to which any intellectual property right exists, including computer software, used in the rendering of the Services and the production of the Work Product and/or materials produced under this Agreement, and that City has full legal title to and the right to reproduce any of the Work Product. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold City, and its elected officials, officers, employees, servants, attorneys, designated volunteers, and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials, harmless from any loss, claim or liability in any way related to a claim that City’s use is violating federal, state or local laws, or any contractual provisions, relating to trade names, Page 37 ____________ Vendor Initials PSA with professional liability insurance (Design) Page 6 Last Revised: 10/2/13 licenses, franchises, patents or other means of protecting intellectual property rights and/or interests in products or inventions. Consultant shall bear all costs arising from the use of patented, copyrighted, trade secret or trademarked documents, materials, software, equipment, devices or processes used or incorporated in the Services and materials produced under this Agreement. In the event City’s use of any of the Work Product is held to constitute an infringement and any use thereof is enjoined, Consultant, at its expense, shall: (a) secure for City the right to continue using the Work Product by suspension of any injunction or by procuring a license or licenses for City; or (b) modify the Work Product so that it becomes non-infringing. This covenant shall survive the termination of this Agreement. 8. Status as Independent Contractor. Consultant is, and shall at all times remain as to City, a wholly independent contractor. Consultant shall have no power to incur any debt, obligation, or liability on behalf of City or otherwise act as an agent of City. Neither City nor any of its agents shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any of Consultant’s employees, except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall not, at any time, or in any manner, represent that it or any of its officers, agents or employees are in any manner employees of City. Consultant shall pay all required taxes on amounts paid to Consultant under this Agreement, and to defend, indemnify and hold City harmless from any and all taxes, assessments, penalties, and interest asserted against City by reason of the independent contractor relationship created by this Agreement. Consultant shall fully comply with the workers’ compensation law regarding Consultant and Consultant’s employees. 9. Confidentiality. Consultant may have access to financial, accounting, statistical, and personnel data of individuals and City employees. Consultant covenants that all data, documents, discussion, or other information developed or received by Consultant or provided for performance of this Agreement are confidential and shall not be disclosed by Consultant without prior written authorization by City. City shall grant such authorization if applicable law requires disclosure. All City data shall be returned to City upon the termination of this Agreement. Consultant’s covenant under this Section shall survive the termination of this Agreement. This provision shall not apply to information in whatever form that is in the public domain, nor shall it restrict the Consultant from giving notices required by law or complying with an order to provide information or data when such an order is issued by a court, administrative agency or other legitimate authority, or if disclosure is otherwise permitted by law and reasonably necessary for the Consultant to defend itself from any legal action or claim. 10. Conflict of Interest. 10.1 Consultant covenants that it presently has no interest and shall not acquire any interest, direct or indirect, which may be affected by the Services, or which would conflict in any manner with the performance of the Services. Consultant further Page 38 ____________ Vendor Initials PSA with professional liability insurance (Design) Page 7 Last Revised: 10/2/13 covenants that, in performance of this Agreement, no person having any such interest shall be employed by it. Furthermore, Consultant shall avoid the appearance of having any interest, which would conflict in any manner with the performance of the Services. Consultant shall not accept any employment or representation during the term of this Agreement which is or may likely make Consultant “financially interested” (as provided in California Government Code §§1090 and 87100) in any decision made by City on any matter in connection with which Consultant has been retained. 10.2 Consultant further represents that it has not employed or retained any person or entity, other than a bona fide employee working exclusively for Consultant, to solicit or obtain this Agreement. Consultant has not paid or agreed to pay any person or entity, other than a bona fide employee working exclusively for Consultant, any fee, commission, gift, percentage, or any other consideration contingent upon the execution of this Agreement. Upon any breach or violation of this warranty, City shall have the right, at its sole and absolute discretion, to terminate this Agreement without further liability, or to deduct from any sums payable to Consultant hereunder the full amount or value of any such fee, commission, percentage or gift. 10.3 Consultant has no knowledge that any officer or employee of City has any interest, whether contractual, noncontractual, financial, proprietary, or otherwise, in this transaction or in the business of Consultant, and that if any such interest comes to the knowledge of Consultant at any time during the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall immediately make a complete, written disclosure of such interest to City, even if such interest would not be deemed a prohibited “conflict of interest” under applicable laws as described in subsection 10.1. 11. Indemnification. 11.1 Design Professional Services. In the connection with its design professional services, the Consultant shall indemnify and hold the City, and its elected officials, officers, employees, servants, volunteers, and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials, (collectively, “Indemnitees”), free and harmless with respect to any and all damages, liabilities, losses, reasonable defense costs or expenses (collectively, “Claims”), including but not limited to liability for death or injury to any person and injury to any property, to which arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the Consultant or any of its officers, employees, subcontractors, consultants, or agents in the performance of its design professional services under this Agreement. 11.2 Other Indemnities. In connection with all Claims not covered by Section 11.1, and to the maximum extent permitted by law, the Consultant shall hold defend, indemnify, and hold the Indemnitees free and harmless with respect to any and all Claims including but not limited to Claims relating to death or injury to any person and Page 39 ____________ Vendor Initials PSA with professional liability insurance (Design) Page 8 Last Revised: 10/2/13 injury to any property, which arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the acts, omissions, activities or operations of Consultant or any of its officers, employees, subcontractors, subconsultants, or agents in the performance of this Agreement. Consultant shall defend Indemnitees in any action or actions filed in connection with any such Claims with counsel of City’s choice, and shall pay all costs and expenses, including actual attorney’s fees and experts’ costs incurred in connection with such defense. The indemnification obligation herein shall not in any way be limited by the insurance obligations contained in this Agreement provided, however, that the Contractor shall have no obligation to indemnify for Claims arising out of the sole negligence or willful misconduct of any of the Indemnitees. 11.3 Nonwaiver of Rights. Indemnitees do not, and shall not, waive any rights that they may possess against Consultant because of the acceptance by City, or the deposit with City, of any insurance policy or certificate required pursuant to this Agreement. 11.4 Waiver of Right of Subrogation. Except as otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement, Consultant, on behalf of itself and all parties claiming under or through it, hereby waives all rights of subrogation against the Indemnitees, while acting within the scope of their duties, from all claims, losses and liabilities arising out of or incident to activities or operations performed by or on behalf of the Consultant. 11.5 Survival. The provisions of this Section 11 shall survive the termination of the Agreement and are in addition to any other rights or remedies which Indemnitees may have under the law. Payment is not required as a condition precedent to an Indemnitee’s right to recover under this indemnity provision, and an entry of judgment against Consultant shall be conclusive in favor of the Indemnitee’s right to recover under this indemnity provision. 12. Insurance. 12.1 Liability Insurance. Consultant shall procure and maintain in full force and effect for the duration of this Agreement, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the services hereunder by Consultant, and/or its agents, representatives, employees and subcontractors. 12.2 Minimum Scope of Insurance. Unless otherwise approved by City, coverage shall be at least as broad as: (1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage (occurrence form CG 0001). Page 40 ____________ Vendor Initials PSA with professional liability insurance (Design) Page 9 Last Revised: 10/2/13 (2) Insurance Services Office form number CA 0001 (Ed. 1/87) covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto). (3) Worker’s Compensation insurance as required by the State of California, and Employer’s Liability Insurance. (4) Professional Liability insurance in a form approved by the City, having, at City’s option, an extended reporting period of not less than three (3) years; or professional liability insurance shall be maintained for a period of three (3) years after completion of the Services which shall, during the entire three (3) year period, provide protection against claims of professional negligence arising out of Consultant’s performance of the Services and otherwise complying with all applicable provisions of this Section 12. The policy shall be endorsed to include contractual liability to the extent insurable. 12.3 Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no less than: (1) Commercial General Liability: $2,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. Commercial General Liability Insurance with a general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this Agreement or the general limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. (2) Automobile Liability: $2,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage. (3) Employer’s Liability: $1,000,000 per accident and in the aggregate for bodily injury or disease and Workers’ Compensation Insurance in the amount required by law. (4) Professional Liability: $1,000,000 per claim/aggregate. (5) The Insurance obligations under this agreement shall be the greater of (i) the Insurance coverages and limits carried by the Contractor; or (ii) the minimum insurance requirements shown in this Agreement. Any insurance proceeds in excess of the specified limits and coverage required which are applicable to a given loss, shall be available to the City. No representation is made that the minimum insurance Page 41 ____________ Vendor Initials PSA with professional liability insurance (Design) Page 10 Last Revised: 10/2/13 requirements of this Agreement are sufficient to cover the obligations of the Contractor under this Agreement. 12.4 Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self- insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City and shall not reduce the limits of coverage. City reserves the right to obtain a full certified copy of any required insurance policy and endorsements. 12.5 Other Insurance Provisions. (1) The commercial general liability and automobile liability policies are to contain the following provisions on a separate additionally insured endorsement naming the City, its officers, officials, employees, designated volunteers and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials as additional insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of Consultant; products and completed operations of Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used by Consultant; and/or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by Consultant. The coverage shall contain no limitations on the scope of protection afforded to City, its officers, officials, employees, designated volunteers or agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials which are not also limitations applicable to the named insured. (2) For any claims related to this Agreement, Consultant’s insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects City, its officers, officials, employees, designated volunteers and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City or officials. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by City, its officers, officials, employees, designated volunteers or agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials shall be excess of Consultant’s insurance and shall not contribute with it. (3) Consultant’s insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer’s liability. (4) Contractor shall provide immediate written notice if (1) any of the required insurance policies is terminated; (2) the limits of any of the required polices are reduced; (3) or the Page 42 ____________ Vendor Initials PSA with professional liability insurance (Design) Page 11 Last Revised: 10/2/13 deductible or self insured retention is increased. In the event of any cancellation or reduction in coverage or limits of any insurance, Contractor shall forthwith obtain and submit proof of substitute insurance. Should Contractor fail to immediately procure other insurance, as specified, to substitute for any canceled policy, the City may procure such insurance at Contractor’s sole cost and expense. (5) Each insurance policy, required by this clause shall expressly waive the insurer’s right of subrogation against City and its elected officials, officers, employees, servants, attorneys, designated volunteers, and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials. (6) Each policy shall be issued by an insurance company approved in writing by City, which is admitted and licensed to do business in the State of California and which is rated A:VII or better according to the most recent A.M. Best Co. Rating Guide. (7) Each policy shall specify that any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the required policy, including breaches of warranty, shall not affect the coverage required to be provided. (8) Each policy shall specify that any and all costs of adjusting and/or defending any claim against any insured, including court costs and attorneys' fees, shall be paid in addition to and shall not deplete any policy limits. (9) Contractor shall provide any and all other required insurance, endorsements, or exclusions as required by the City in any request for proposals applicable to this Agreement. 12.6 Evidence of coverage. Prior to commencing performance under this Agreement, the Consultant shall furnish the City with certificates and original endorsements, or copies of each required policy, effecting and evidencing the insurance coverage required by this Agreement including (1) Additional Insured Endorsement(s), (2) Worker’s Compensation waiver of subrogation endorsement, and (3) General liability declarations or endorsement page listing all policy endorsements. The endorsements shall be signed by a person authorized by the insurer(s) to bind coverage on its behalf. All endorsements or policies shall be received and approved by the City before Consultant commences performance. If performance of this Agreement shall extend beyond one year, Page 43 ____________ Vendor Initials PSA with professional liability insurance (Design) Page 12 Last Revised: 10/2/13 Consultant shall provide City with the required policies or endorsements evidencing renewal of the required policies of insurance prior to the expiration of any required policies of insurance. 12.7 Contractor agrees to include in all contracts with all subcontractors performing work pursuant to this Agreement, the same requirements and provisions of this Agreement including the indemnity and insurance requirements to the extent they apply to the scope of any such subcontractor’s work. Contractor shall require its subcontractors to be bound to Contractor and City in the same manner and to the same extent as Contractor is bound to City pursuant to this Agreement, and to require each of its subcontractors to include these same provisions in its contract with any sub-subcontractor. 13. Cooperation. In the event any claim or action is brought against City relating to Consultant’s performance or services rendered under this Agreement, Consultant shall render any reasonable assistance and cooperation that City might require. City shall compensate Consultant for any litigation support services in an amount to be agreed upon by the parties. 14. Termination. City shall have the right to terminate this Agreement at any time for any or no reason on not less than ten (10) days prior written notice to Consultant. In the event City exercises its right to terminate this Agreement, City shall pay Consultant for any services satisfactorily rendered prior to the effective date of the termination, provided Consultant is not then in breach of this Agreement. Consultant shall have no other claim against City by reason of such termination, including any claim for compensation. City may terminate for cause following a default remaining uncured more than five (5) business days after service of a notice to cure on the breaching party. Consultant may terminate this Agreement for cause upon giving the City ten (10) business days prior written notice for any of the following: (1) uncured breach by the City of any material term of this Agreement, including but not limited to Payment Terms; (2) material changes in the conditions under which this Agreement was entered into, coupled with the failure of the parties to reach accord on the fees and charges for any Additional Services required because of such changes. 15. Notices. Any notices, bills, invoices, or reports authorized or required by this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed received on (a) the day of delivery if delivered by hand or overnight courier service during Consultant’s and City’s regular business hours; or (b) on the third business day following deposit in the United States mail, postage prepaid, to the addresses set forth in this Section, or to such other addresses as the parties may, from time to time, designate in writing pursuant to the provisions of this Section. All notices shall be addressed as follows: Page 44 ____________ Vendor Initials PSA with professional liability insurance (Design) Page 13 Last Revised: 10/2/13 If to City: Robert Neiuber, Human Resources Director 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 91730 If to Consultant: J. Scott Tiedemann, Managing Partner 6033 W. Century Boulevard, 5th Floor Los Angeles, Ca 90045 16. Non-Discrimination and Equal Employment Opportunity. In the performance of this Agreement, Consultant shall not discriminate against any employee, subcontractor, or applicant for employment because of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin, ancestry, age, physical or mental handicap, medical condition, or sexual orientation. Consultant will take affirmative action to ensure that subcontractors and applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment, without regard to their race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin, ancestry, age, physical or mental handicap, medical condition, or sexual orientation. 17. Assignment and Subcontracting. Consultant shall not assign or transfer any interest in this Agreement or subcontract the performance of any of Consultant’s obligations hereunder without City’s prior written consent. Except as provided herein, any attempt by Consultant to so assign, transfer, or subcontract any rights, duties, or obligations arising hereunder shall be null, void and of no effect. 18 Compliance with Laws. Consultant shall comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws, ordinances, codes and regulations in force at the time Consultant performs the Services. CONSULTANT is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Section 1720, et seq., and 1770, et seq., as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 16000, et seq., (“Prevailing Wage Laws”), which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on “public works” and “maintenance” projects. If the Services are being performed as part of an applicable “public works” or “maintenance” project, as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws, and if the total compensation is $1,000 or more, CONSULTANT agrees to fully comply with such Prevailing Wage Laws. The applicable prevailing wage rate determinations can be found at http://www.dir.ca.gov/dlsr/DPreWageDetermination.htm CONSULTANT shall make copies of the prevailing rates of per diem wages for each craft, classification or type of worker needed to execute the Services available to interested parties upon request, and shall post copies at the Consultant’s principal place of business and at the Project site. CONSULTANT shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its elected officials, officers, employees and agents free and harmless from any claim or Page 45 ____________ Vendor Initials PSA with professional liability insurance (Design) Page 14 Last Revised: 10/2/13 liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws. 19. Non-Waiver of Terms, Rights and Remedies. Waiver by either party of any one or more of the conditions of performance under this Agreement shall not be a waiver of any other condition of performance under this Agreement. In no event shall the making by City of any payment to Consultant constitute or be construed as a waiver by City of any breach of covenant, or any default which may then exist on the part of Consultant, and the making of any such payment by City shall in no way impair or prejudice any right or remedy available to City with regard to such breach or default. 20. Attorney’s Fees. In the event that either party to this Agreement shall commence any legal action or proceeding to enforce or interpret the provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party in such action or proceeding shall be entitled to recover its costs of suit, including reasonable attorney’s fees and costs of experts. 21. Exhibits; Precedence. All documents referenced as exhibits in this Agreement are hereby incorporated in this Agreement. In the event of any material discrepancy between the express provisions of this Agreement and the provisions of any document incorporated herein by reference, the provisions of this Agreement shall prevail. 22. Applicable Law and Venue. The validity, interpretation, and performance of this Agreement shall be controlled by and construed under the laws of the State of California. Venue for any action relating to this Agreement shall be in the San Bernardino County Superior Court. 23. Construction. In the event of any asserted ambiguity in, or dispute regarding the interpretation of any matter herein, the interpretation of this Agreement shall not be resolved by any rules of interpretation providing for interpretation against the party who causes the uncertainty to exist or against the party who drafted the Agreement or who drafted that portion of the Agreement. 24. Entire Agreement. This Agreement consists of this document, and any other documents, attachments and/or exhibits referenced herein and attached hereto, each of which is incorporated herein by such reference, and the same represents the entire and integrated agreement between Consultant and City. This Agreement supersedes all prior oral or written negotiations, representations or agreements. This Agreement may not be amended, nor any provision or breach hereof waived, except in a writing signed by the parties which expressly refers to this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties, through their respective authorized representatives, have executed this Agreement as of the date first written above. Page 46 ____________ Vendor Initials PSA with professional liability insurance (Design) Page 15 Last Revised: 10/2/13 Consultant Name: Liebert Cassidy Whitmore By: ______________________________ Name Date ______________________________ Title City of Rancho Cucamonga By:________________________________ Name Date _________________________________ Title By: ______________________________ Name Date ______________________________ Title City of Rancho Cucamonga By:________________________________ Name Date _________________________________ Title (two signatures required if corporation) EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF SERVICES See Attached Page 47 ____________ Vendor Initials PSA with professional liability insurance (Design) Page 16 Last Revised: 10/2/13 EXHIBIT B SCHEDULE OF PERFORMANCE See Attached Page 48 ____________ Vendor Initials PSA with professional liability insurance (Design) Page 17 Last Revised: 10/2/13 Page 49 ____________ Vendor Initials PSA with professional liability insurance (Design) Page 18 Last Revised: 10/2/13 Attachment A – Sample Waiver of Subrogation (Sample Only – Not all forms will look identical to this Sample) The City of Rancho Cucamonga, its officers, officials, employees, designated volunteers and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City or officials. Page 50 ____________ Vendor Initials PSA with professional liability insurance (Design) Page 19 Last Revised: 10/2/13 Attachment B – Sample Additional Insured for On-going Projects The City of Rancho Cucamonga, its officers, officials, employees, designated volunteers and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City or officials. Page 51 Last Revised: 11/04/13 Page 1 of 2 ADDENDUM NO. 1 to Professional Services Agreement Whereas; Liebert Cassidy Whitmore (hereinafter “LCW”) and the City of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter the “City”) intend to enter into a Professional Services Agreement (hereinafter “Agreement”), and Whereas; LCW has identified the following exceptions to the Agreement; Section 11.2 Other Indemnities. In connection with all Claims not covered by Section 11.1, and to the maximum extent permitted by law, the Consultant shall hold defend, indemnify, and hold the Indemnitees free and harmless with respect to any and all Claims including but not limited to Claims relating to death or injury to any person and injury to any property, which arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligent acts, errors or omissions of Consultant or any of its officers, employees, subcontractors, subconsultants, or agents in the performance of this Agreement. Consultant shall defend Indemnitees in any action or actions filed in connection with any such Claims with counsel of City’s choice, and shall pay all costs and expenses, including actual attorney’s fees and experts’ costs incurred in connection with such defense. The indemnification obligation herein shall not in any way be limited by the insurance obligations contained in this Agreement provided, however, that the Contractor shall have no obligation to indemnify for Claims arising out of the sole negligence or willful misconduct of any of the Indemnitees. Now therefore: LCW and the City desire to incorporate the above exceptions to the attached Professional Services Agreement. Please indicate your agreement by way of signature to this Addendum No. 1 and the attached Professional Services Agreement. Please return two (2) original signed copies to the City no later than October 15, 2021 The City will process for signature and provide LCW with one (1) fully executed copy of the Professional Services Agreement and Addendum No. 1. Liebert Cassidy Whitmore By: ______________________________ Name Date ______________________________ Title City of Rancho Cucamonga By:________________________________ Name Date _________________________________ Title ATTACHMENT 2 Page 52 Last Revised: 11/04/13 Page 2 of 2 By: ______________________________ Name Date ______________________________ Title By:________________________________ Name Date _________________________________ Title (two signatures required if corporation) Page 53 1 9567545.1 LC001-009 AGREEMENT FOR SPECIAL SERVICES This Agreement is entered into between the law firm of LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE, A Professional Corporation (“Attorney”), and the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, A Municipal Corporation (“City”). 1.Conditions This Agreement will not take effect, and Attorney will have no obligation to provide services, until City returns a properly signed and executed copy of this Agreement. 2.Attorney’s Services Attorney agrees to provide City with consulting, representational and legal services pertaining to employment relations matters, including representation in negotiations and in administrative and court proceedings, as requested by City or otherwise required by law. 3.Fees, Costs, Expenses City agrees to pay Attorney the sums billed monthly for time spent by Attorney in providing the services, including reasonable travel time. The current range of hourly rates for Attorney time is from Two Hundred Ten to Three Hundred Eighty Dollars ($210.00 - $380.00). See Schedule I for a full Fee Schedule. LCW reviews its hourly rates on an annual basis and, if appropriate, adjusts them effective July 1. LCW will provide the Client with written notification of any adjustment in the range of rates. LCW bills its time in units of one-tenth of an hour. ATTACHMENT 3 Page 54 2 9567545.1 LC001-009 For Litigation Matters See Schedule II attached for a description of LCW’s Litigation and EDiscovery Management. Other Expenses City agrees to reimburse LCW for necessary costs and expenses incurred by LCW on behalf of City. LCW bills photocopying charges at Fifteen Cents ($0.15) per page. See Schedule I attached. Payment by City against monthly billings is due upon receipt of statements, and is considered delinquent if payment is not received within thirty (30) days of the date of the invoice. 4. Professional Liability Insurance The California Business & Professions Code requires us to inform you whether we maintain errors and omissions insurance coverage applicable to the services to be rendered to you. We hereby confirm that the firm does maintain such insurance coverage. 5. Arbitration of Professional Liability or Other Claims Disputes. If a dispute between City and Attorney arises over fees charged for services, the controversy will be submitted to binding arbitration in accordance with the rules of the California State Bar Fee Arbitration Program, set forth in California Business and Professions Code, sections 6200 through 6206. The arbitrator or arbitration panel shall have the authority to award to the prevailing party attorneys’ fees, costs and interest incurred. Any arbitration award may be served by mail upon either side and personal service shall not be required. Page 55 3 9567545.1 LC001-009 If a dispute arises between City and Attorney over any other aspect of the attorney-client relationship, including, without limitation, a claim for breach of professional duty, that dispute will also be resolved by arbitration. It is understood that any dispute as to any alleged breach of professional duty (that is, as to whether any legal services rendered under this agreement were allegedly unnecessary, unauthorized, omitted entirely, or were improperly, negligently or incompetently rendered) will be determined by submission to arbitration as provided by California law, and not by a lawsuit or resort to court process except as California law provides for judicial review of arbitration proceedings. Both parties to this agreement, by entering into it, are giving up their constitutional right to have any such dispute decided in a court of law before a jury, and instead are accepting the use of arbitration. Each party is to bear its own attorney’s fees and costs. 6. File Retention After our services conclude, Attorney will, upon City’s request, deliver the file for the matter to City, along with any funds or property of City’s in our possession. If City requests the file for the matter, Attorney will retain a copy of the file at the City’s expense. If City does not request the file for this matter, we will retain it for a period of seven (7) years after this matter is closed. If City does not request delivery of the file for this matter before the end of the seven (7) year period, we will have no further obligation to retain the file and may, at our discretion, destroy it without further notice to City. At any point during the seven (7) year period, City may request delivery of the file. 7. Assignment This Agreement is not assignable without the written consent of City. Page 56 4 9567545.1 LC001-009 8. Independent Contractor It is understood and agreed that Attorney, while engaged in performing the terms of this Agreement, is an independent contractor and not an employee of City. 9. Authority The signators to this Agreement represent that they hold the positions set forth below their signatures, and that they are authorized to execute this Agreement on behalf of their respective parties and to bind their respective parties hereto. 10. Term This Agreement is effective June 21, 2021, ongoing and may be modified by mutual agreement of the parties. This agreement shall be terminable by either party upon thirty (30) days written notice. LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, A Professional Corporation A Municipal Corporation By: _ By: _ Name: Name: Title: Title: Date: Date: Page 57 5 9567545.1 LC001-009 SCHEDULE I – FEES & COSTS 1. Hourly Rates (As of Agreement Effective Date) Partners $370.00 Senior Counsel $320.00 Associates $210.00 - $300.00 Labor Relations/HR Consultant $240.00 Paralegals $130.00 E- Discovery Specialists $130.00 Law Clerks $130.00 - $170.00 Hourly rates (Effective July 1, 2021) Partners $380.00 Senior Counsel $325.00 Associates $210.00 - $305.00 Labor Relations/HR Consultant $240.00 Paralegals $135.00 E-Discovery Specialists $135.00 Law Clerks $135.00 - $175.00 2. COSTS 1. Photocopies $0.15 per copy Page 58 6 9567545.1 LC001-009 SCHEDULE II LCW LITIGATION and E-DISCOVERY MANAGEMENT LCW is committed to using state-of-the-art technology to efficiently manage and harness electronically-stored information (“ESI”) in compliance with Federal and State law requirements. LCW partners with an outside managed services provider to provide Relativity, the industry leading e-discovery software, for this purpose. The cost for each matter will depend on the volume and format of the data. For non-complex data up to 50 gigabytes, LCW charges a monthly fee of $375 on all active litigation matters for data management, including data validation and security, ingestion, de-duplication, culling and streamlining, and creation of Relativity fields for expedited review. For data of 50 gigabytes and over and for complex data requiring specialized services (e.g., payroll data, spreadsheets with underlying formulas, video, advanced searches, etc.), additional charges are incurred and are passed through to the client. For such charges, we will provide an itemized bill from our managed services provider and obtain client approval prior to incurring the charges. Litigation Case Staffing LCW has organized its litigation practice to meet the challenges of today’s complex litigation cases. We employ a dedicated Litigation Manager – a non-billing attorney litigator – whose responsibility is to monitor all litigation cases to ensure quality, efficiency, and adherence to client and firm litigation guidelines. Each litigation case is staffed with a Partner, an Associate (or Associates, as required and as approved by the Client), a Paralegal and an E-Discovery Specialist. Our E-Discovery Specialists have extensive experience in the efficient management of electronic data through every stage of the e-discovery life cycle, and they strategize with attorneys and clients on effective ESI protocols. This makes the document review process more efficient and enables our attorneys to target the most relevant data to meet litigation objectives. Working with our e-discovery managed services provider, we are able to provide state-of-the-art data processing and hosting services at below-market rates. Page 59 DATE:September 15, 2021 TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY:Carrie Rios, Community Improvement Manager SUBJECT:Consideration of a Professional Services Agreement with Dapeer Rosenblit Litvak, LLP for Legal Services Related to the Municipal Code and Other Civil Matters. (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council approve the Professional Services Agreement with Dapeer, Rosenblit & Litvak, LLP for legal services related to enforcement of the Municipal Code, including nuisance abatement, criminal prosecution, receivership action, and other civil matters. BACKGROUND: Dapeer, Rosenblit & Litvak, LLP has represented municipalities in criminal, civil, and administrative proceedings to enforce State and local laws and regulations for more than 40 years. Although the City already contracts with Silver & Wright for legal services pertaining to the enforcement of the municipal code, Staff is interested in expanding its access to legal services in order to assist with the abatement of substandard, hazardous, and otherwise unlawful conditions and activities throughout the City. In addition to addressing substandard property conditions, the City’s Community Improvement Division and Police Department are often tasked with responding to other situations that require an expeditious response – including cannabis grows, birthing houses, vacant structures and attractive nuisances, transients, short term vacation rentals, and excessive noise complaints. Having access to the services of Dapeer, Rosenblit & Litvak will not only allow Staff to more expeditiously respond to issues within our City, but they can also assist should there be any conflicts of interest with other legal counsel. ANALYSIS: Dapeer, Rosenblit & Litvak, LLP (“DRL”) began representing municipalities in 1979 and has dedicated itself to assisting local communities in their efforts to provide quality of life to their residents and protect against conditions and activities that impact the public health, safety, and welfare. Over the course of the past 40 years, DRL has worked to reduce blight, increase public safety, and combat all types of nuisances that, as per the “broken window” theory, undermine the social and economic backbones of communities. DRL has accomplished these tasks by helping cities Page 60 Page 2 9 5 5 establish “Code Enforcement” policies and procedures; training officers to detect, investigate, and abate municipal code violations; instituting processes designed to increase voluntary compliance; modifying and/or adopting necessary code provisions to achieve community goals; and, commencing appropriate legal enforcement procedures in the administrative, civil, and criminal arenas - all while also helping municipalities establish cost recovery programs to ensure the continued viability and vitality of such law enforcement efforts. While traditional violations of building and safety codes persist, social and environmental changes have created ever new and more complex situations. DRL has been innovative in creating legal avenues to address these problems and to cooperate with various local, state, and federal authorities in addressing complex legal violations. DRL has been and continues to lead the legal community in dealing with these problems creatively and efficiently. DRL attorneys regularly prosecute violators of local ordinances, appear in administrative proceedings, act as hearing officers for public entities, and appear in civil proceedings to enforce local law and to advocate for their municipal clients. DRL attorneys actively litigate in all state and federal courts and regularly appear in appellate courts, including the California Courts of Appeal, the California Supreme Court, the 9th Circuit, and the United States Supreme Court. These appearances have resulted in numerous published opinions of importance to local communities. DRL attorneys are regarded as experts in the field of “Code Enforcement” and have been featured as guest speakers and lecturers to law enforcement agencies, government associations, and educational institutions throughout the State. DRL attorneys have spoken on such topics as criminal procedure and prosecutions; investigations and Fourth Amendment implications; administrative citation programs; regulation of adult businesses and other First Amendment activities; medical marijuana dispensaries; hoarders/pack-rats; receiverships; and cost-recovery programs. The firm also regularly works with city staff and management and city attorneys in creating programs, protocols, and ordinances that address problems and tailor them to the unique circumstances faced by individual cities. DRL is one of the most established and experienced law firms in California dedicated to assisting Cities in the enforcement of its municipal code and applicable State laws through administrative, civil, and criminal processes. Ten (10) attorneys, in addition to paralegals, clerks, and administrative assistants, will provide all of the necessary legal services for the City. All attorneys are licensed to practice law throughout California. A copy of the agreement is on file with the City Clerk’s office. FISCAL IMPACT: There should not be any fiscal impact, as the cost of services has already been budgeted for the Fiscal Year 2021/22 in various accounts for civil litigation and criminal prosecution. Additionally, as authorized by the California Government Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, Dapeer Rosenblit Litvak, LLP strongly pursues cost recovery for services required to bring a property into compliance. Page 61 Page 3 9 5 5 COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: This item addresses the City Councils Core Values of promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community for all while providing the city with legal services to combat blight in our neighborhoods. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 – Proposal Page 62 Dapeer Rosenblit Litvak, LLP -Protecting Communities Since 1979 - FIRM PROFILE AND PROPOSAL FOR CODE ENFORCEMENT / CITY PROSECUTOR AND LITIGATION SERVICES PRESENTED TO THE City of Rancho Cucamonga June 7, 2021 CONTACT INFORMATION WILLIAM LITVAK, MANAGING PARTNER / WLITVAK@DRLLAW.COM JAMES ECKART, PARTNER / JECKART@DRLLAW.COM 11500 W. OLYMPIC BOULEVARD, SUITE 550 LOS ANGELES, CA 90064 TEL (310) 477-5575 FAX (310) 477-7090 WWW.DRLLAW.COM Attachment 1 Page 63 2 ❖ Experience ❖ Commitment ❖ Integrity ❖ Preparation ❖ Public Service INTRODUCTION AND FIRM HISTORY Dapeer, Rosenblit & Litvak, LLP (“DRL”) began representing municipalities in 1979 and has dedicated itself to assisting local communities in their efforts to provide quality of life to their residents and protect against conditions and activities that impact the public health, safety, and welfare. Over the course of the past 40 years, DRL has worked to reduce blight, increase public safety, and combat all types of nuisances that, as per the “broken window” theory, undermine the social and economic backbones of communities. DRL has accomplished these tasks by helping cities establish “Code Enforcement” policies and procedures; training officers to detect, investigate, and abate municipal code violations; instituting processes designed to increase voluntary compliance; modifying and/or adopting necessary code provisions to achieve community goals; and, commencing appropriate legal enforcement procedures in the administrative, civil, and criminal arenas - all while also helping municipalities establish cost recovery programs to ensure the continued viability and vitality of such law enforcement efforts. While traditional violations of building and safety codes persist, social and environmental changes have created ever new and more complex situations. DRL has been innovative in creating legal avenues to address these problems and to cooperate with various local, state and federal authorities in addressing complex legal violations. DRL has been and continues to lead the legal community in dealing with these problems creatively and efficiently. DRL attorneys regularly prosecute violators of local ordinances, appear in administrative proceedings, act as hearing officers for public entities, and appear in civil proceedings to enforce local law and to advocate for their municipal clients. DRL attorneys actively litigate in all state and federal courts and regularly appear in appellate courts, including the California Courts of Appeal, the California Supreme Court, the 9th Circuit and the United States Supreme Court. These appearances have resulted in numerous published opinions of importance to local communities. DRL attorneys are regarded as experts in the field of “Code Enforcement” and have been featured as guest speakers and lecturers to law enforcement agencies, government associations, and educational institutions throughout the State. DRL attorneys have spoken on such topics as criminal procedure and prosecutions; investigations and Fourth Amendment implications; administrative citation programs; regulation of adult businesses and other First Amendment activities; medical marijuana dispensaries; hoarders/pack-rats; receiverships; and cost-recovery programs. The firm also regularly works with city staff and management and city attorneys in creating programs, protocols and ordinances that address problems and tailor them to the unique circumstances faced by individual cities. Page 64 3 DRL is “AV” rated by Martindale-Hubbell (their highest rating for ethics and quality of legal service), is a member of the Law Council of America, and is dedicated to diversity in the legal community. DRL attorneys have also been recognized as Southern California “Super Lawyers” and “Rising Stars.” As representatives of local government, DRL has adopted the highest standards of ethical responsibility. The attorneys at DRL understand that their roles as prosecutors and public representatives entail a duty to seek justice in all enforcement actions – whether administrative, civil, or criminal. DRL has garnered a reputation with judges and defense counsel in criminal and civil courts throughout the State as experienced prosecutors and litigators who utilize every available tool to obtain compliance and maintain public safety for our clients, while being fair and reasonable to preserve both our clients’ and the courts’ resources. Notwithstanding the 160 years of collective court-room experience of senior DRL attorneys, DRL’s philosophy and commitment is to obtain voluntary compliance whenever possible. The arts of persuasion and diplomacy are utilized with great success to achieve this objective – allowing DRL and its clients to either avoid costly litigation altogether or to conclude it with the highest degree of success. DRL also believes a fundamental aspect of obtaining voluntary resolutions is an understanding in the community that DRL lawyers are skilled advocates who take great care to prepare each case for trial and demonstrate a proficiency as to the facts and law applicable to each matter. As a result of their diligent and thorough efforts, DRL’s lawyers have enjoyed extraordinary success in both voluntary compliance and at trial. While preserving its prosecutorial independence, upholding ethical responsibilities and avoiding conflicts of interest, DRL attorneys work closely with City Staff in all matters referred to it. DRL attorneys maintain regular communications with City Staff to ensure that the best interests of the community are always paramount in any legal decisions made. Constant communication and involvement with City Staff is a mainstay of DRL’s philosophy and a substantial reason for its continued success. DRL also recognizes that the hard work and dedication of City personnel are the foundation of any successful code enforcement proceeding. As such, our clients have embraced our core belief that the firm is more than just the attorneys who handle courtroom proceedings. Rather, the firm is part of the “City Team” (which consists not only of Code Enforcement Officers, but also representatives of the Police and Fire Departments, as well as Building & Safety, Planning, Public Works, and Finance Departments, and other City divisions). DRL attorneys are often requested to provide advice and strategy at the commencement of an investigation to provide the City with the best chance of achieving quick and complete compliance. In most cases, DRL increases the City’s voluntary compliance success rate by issuing written compliance request letters to violators prior to commencing legal action. And, if additional evidence or investigation is required prior to commencing an enforcement proceeding, DRL attorneys will not only advise Staff what is required but will provide insight into and assistance with accomplishing it. Page 65 4 The dedication, experience, and philosophy of DRL has allowed the firm to successfully resolve thousands of cases involving: • Building Codes • Zoning Codes • Fire Codes • Property Maintenance & Health Codes • Nuisance Abatement • Marijuana Regulations • Specially Regulated Activities • Red Light Abatement Ordinances and Statutes • Massage Establishment Reg. • Adult Entertainment Regulation • License and Tax Codes • Automated Red-Light Traffic Enforcement • Ordinance Review and Analysis Miscellaneous Matters • Noise disturbances, illegal peddling, drinking in public, aggressive panhandling, and illegal use of public property. • Animal Control/Dangerous and Vicious dogs. • Prostitution and Gambling issues. • License and Permit Revocations. • Conditional Use Permit enforcement and termination • Defending cities in mandamus proceedings in the superior court. • Representing appellants and respondents in governmental and private party appeals. • Formulating or revising code enforcement programs. • Assisting task force programs (police, fire, building planning, county health and state agencies) to reduce crime and related Housing and Building Code violations. • Overseeing “sting” operations by police/sheriff personnel regarding motel operators and illegal massage parlors. • Prosecuting injunctive actions in the superior court to abate continuing public nuisances. Services Available Related to Code Enforcement Programs • Code Enforcement Case and Program Consultation • Criminal Prosecution • Administrative Enforcement/Hearings • Health and Safety Code Receiverships • Inspection and Abatement Warrants • Administrative Citations Hearings and Appeals • Civil Code Enforcement • Municipal Litigation • Specialty Ordinance Review and Preparation • Mandamus and Appellate matters • Custom program and litigation services Implementation Page 66 5 DRL has successfully assisted Cities in increasing the percentage of matters resolved through voluntary compliance – thereby avoiding the unnecessary expenditure of precious City resources. In order to achieve these results, however, requires that the City and its prosecutor be prepared to proceed with prosecution or litigation to demonstrate that absent voluntary compliance, there will be legal consequences to violating local and state laws. DRL works closely with staff and city attorneys in formulating protocols for rendering services and in identifying areas where the firm may be of assistance. Staff attorneys meet with appropriate City Staff to discuss current City policies, procedures, and practices as they relate to the enforcement of the municipal code and applicable State laws, in addition to coordinating procedures for the referral of cases to our office. Care would be taken to discuss ongoing cases, as well as any areas on which the City would like to focus its code enforcement efforts and resources. Upon transfer of cases to our office, DRL lawyers will independently analyze the issues and evidence in each case. Thereafter, the firm will provide Staff with our recommended course of action – which will be based upon our experience and expertise at achieving complete compliance in a timely fashion, while preserving City resources. If desired by the City, DRL will hold “office hours” at City Hall on a regular (agreed-upon) basis to provide City Staff an opportunity to meet with us to discuss ongoing cases and/or other issues. Notwithstanding any agreed-upon office hours, DRL lawyers will be readily accessible at all times to respond to any telephonic or email inquiries and/or to discuss cases with Staff. Firm Staffing DRL is one of the most established and experienced law firms in California dedicated to assisting Cities in the enforcement of its municipal code and applicable State laws through administrative, civil, and criminal processes. Although DRL’s roster includes over 50 municipalities in 6 California counties, the majority of our clients are located in Los Angeles County. Ten (10) attorneys, in addition to paralegals, clerks, and administrative assistants, will provide all of the necessary legal services for the City. All attorneys are licensed to practice law throughout California. DRL’s attorneys are: • William Litvak, Partner (Managing Partner – Chief Trial Attorney: Civil, Criminal and Appellate Departments) • Steven H. Rosenblit, Partner (Prosecutor and City Counselor) • Kenneth B. Dapeer, Partner (Prosecutor and City Counselor) • James Eckart, Partner (Prosecutor and City Counselor) Page 67 6 • Patricia Fitzgerald, Associate (Prosecutor) • Eric P. Markus, Senior Associate (Trial Attorney) • Caroline K. Castillo, Senior Associate (Trial Attorney) • Joan Smyth, Senior Associate (Trial Attorney) Senior Attorneys William Litvak has handled criminal and civil matters – both at the trial and appellate levels – on behalf of municipalities for almost 30 years and has been named a Super Lawyer for Southern California multiple times. He has additionally served as an arbitrator, settlement officer, and judge pro tem for the Los Angeles Superior Court, and has been an instructor, guest speaker, and/or lecturer on such topics as medical marijuana dispensaries, “red light” (gambling and prosecution) nuisance abatement, narcotics nuisance abatement, injunctions and receiverships, and red light photo enforcement, including appearing before the California Supreme Court in a successful defense of these important safety programs. Recently, he was also successful before the 9th Circuit of the United States Court of Appeal in protecting the rights of city police and enforcement officers to enter private businesses for the purposes of investigating violations of law. Mr. Litvak was selected to represent all of the member cities of the California Contract Cities Association in a contractual dispute with the County of Los Angeles related to a multimillion-dollar contract for sheriff services. He is licensed to practice before all courts of this state, the 9th Circuit and the United States Supreme Court. He also regularly represents public entities in civil rights, inverse condemnation and commercial matters. James Eckart has spent the past 22 years (both as a City Prosecutor and with the Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office) criminally prosecuting individuals who violate State and local laws. He has been an instructor, guest speaker, and/or lecturer for numerous Police Departments, the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department, Code Enforcement Officer associations, Los Angeles County Health Department, and other governmental personnel on investigation techniques, search & seizure issues, report writing, and court procedures and testimony. Mr. Eckart serves as an adjunct faculty member of Santiago Canyon College, teaching courses on public policy and legal aspects of law enforcement. Mr. Eckart has also authored and presented training to over 300 City Attorneys (through the League of California Cities) on how to successfully prosecute municipal code violations. Additionally, Mr. Eckart regularly drafts ordinances and/or revisions to municipal code provisions to ensure clients have the most up-to-date tools available to tackle issues arising within their jurisdiction. Steven Rosenblit and Kenneth Dapeer founded this office in 1978, and since that time have focused their practice almost exclusively to serving municipalities as their designated City Prosecutors. Their dedication to providing their municipal clients with the best legal advice and highest quality work product has resulted in frequent requests for Mr. Rosenblit and Mr. Dapeer to be instructors, lecturers, and speakers at code enforcement workshops for code enforcement officers throughout the State. Page 68 7 Fee and Compensation Schedule: Every municipality is unique – and its level of code enforcement activity is equally so. In consideration of the varying degrees of code enforcement activity by each of our municipal clients, the Firm does not seek a monthly retainer for legal services. Rather, the firm’s legal fees are based upon an hourly rate (as set forth herein). As such, fees are only incurred when and if the City requires assistance from the Firm. Due to the experience of the Firm’s lawyers and staff in code enforcement, the Firm is able to provide the highest quality of services in the most efficient manner possible, thereby maximizing the cost effectiveness of the City’s code enforcement program. DRL hourly rates: A. Criminal Prosecution Services – $200/hours; B. Administrative Services - $225/hour; C. Code Enforcement General Municipal Litigation and Appellate Services, including Health and Safety Code Receiverships - $250/hour. D. Para-professional Services - $185/195/205 per hour for categories A, B and C, respectively E. Expenses and Costs In addition to fees, the Firm would be entitled to reimbursement of costs and expenses incurred in performing our services. Such costs would include, but not be limited to: • Process server fees and charges – As incurred for service of “Notices to Appear,” filing of pleadings in court and the procurement of certified public records when not otherwise available from our electronic service providers, and other similar charges; • Online 3rd party database providers – Transaction fee of $15 for each request/search, in addition to actual charges for the service provider. These searches include property ownership information, lien and/or loan documents, corporate or other business information, and “discovery” on individuals to identify and locate responsible parties; • Online legal research charges – As incurred; • Copier charges – B&W – 10¢/page; Color - 25¢/page; • Postage – As incurred; • Exhibit preparation (including enlargement of photographs) – As incurred; • Court reporter or transcript fees – As incurred at cost. • Approved travel expenses, reimbursed at cost. • Parking, entrance or other fees incurred to attend hearing or proceeding, reimbursed at cost. • Any extraordinary expenses (e.g., 3rd party expert witness or consulting fees) incurred with prior City approval. Page 69 8 Fee and Cost Recovery The firm believes that to the extent legally permissible the public should not have to bear the ultimate cost for remediation of code violation or to secure compliance with the City’s laws. Therefore, in each proceeding we evaluate all available sources for reimbursement to the City for the attorneys’ fees, staff time and expenses incurred. In accordance with applicable law, we will endeavor to request reimbursement in appropriate circumstances. Insurance DRL maintains professional liability coverage in the amount of $2,000,000 per occurrence and $2,000,000 in the aggregate. Conclusion DRL’s core belief is that the best results are obtained through thoughtful, deliberate, and thorough preparation. The Firm steadfastly adheres to the principles of respect, courtesy, cooperation, and diversity. While always ready to proceed with litigation, DRL attorneys strive to reach a voluntary resolution to disputes. DRL attorneys are available to provide training, advice, and support to City Staff to ensure the best possible result from legal enforcement actions. The Firm understands the budgetary and other resource constraints that our clients face, and the Firm work as part of the City Team to maximize the results of any enforcement action commenced by the City while conserving City resources. Neither DRL nor its lawyers seek or accept assignments as City Attorneys. The Firm believes that as city prosecutors it needs to provide an independent perspective unrelated to the City’s policy decisions thus avoiding any appearance that prosecutorial services are being used for any other purpose. DRL values its independence and reserves to the judgment of its lawyers consistent with ethical obligations to determine which cases will proceed to prosecution. DRL lawyers are excited about this opportunity to work with City of Rancho Cucamonga, and believe that our experience, competitive fees, and dedication to the field of public law make the firm uniquely qualified to assist the City with its code enforcement needs. For further information, please contact the firm’s managing partner, William Litvak as indicated below or at wlitvak@drllaw.com. Dapeer Rosenblit Litvak, llp 11500 W. Olympic Blvd. Suite 550 Los Angeles, California 90064 Tel (310) 477-5575 Fax (310) 477-7090 www.drllaw.com Page 70 DATE:September 15, 2021 TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY:Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Annette Cano-Soza, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT:Consideration of an Improvement Agreement Extension for Case No. DRC2018-00430, Located East of Vineyard Avenue North of 8th Street, Submitted by Richard Collins Jr. (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council approve the Improvement Agreement Extension for Case No. DRC2018-00430 located east of Vineyard Avenue and north of 8th Street. BACKGROUND: On January 22, 2020, the Planning Commission approved Case No. DRC2018-00430 for the construction of a new 25,399 square foot industrial warehouse building located in the General Industrial (GI) District, east of Vineyard Avenue and north of 8th Street. On September 16, 2020, City Council approved an Improvement Agreement and associated securities to guarantee the construction of the public improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond No. 1001140396 $29,300 Labor and Material Bond No. 1001140396 $29,300 ANALYSIS: The developer, Richard Collins Jr., has submitted a request for a 12-month extension to the Improvement Agreement. Completion of the public improvements has been delayed due to the developer currently working with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to purchase the adjacent parcel, which will allow the proposed project to be completed. If approved, the Improvement Agreement would be extended to September 16, 2022. FISCAL IMPACT: None. COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: This item addresses the City Council’s vision for the City by ensuring the construction of high- quality public improvements that promote a world class community. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 - Vicinity Map Page 71 ATTACHMENT 1 1 6 3 3 DRC2018-00430 Vicinity Map NOT TO SCALE Project Site Page 72 DATE:September 15, 2021 TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY:Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Sandra Salazar, Associate Engineer SUBJECT:Consideration to Accept as Complete, File a Notice of Completion, and Authorize Release of Retention, and Bonds for the School Crosswalk Improvements Project, Contract No. 2021-054. (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council: 1. Accept the School Crosswalk Improvements Project, Contract No. 2021-054 (Project), as complete; 2. Approve the final contract amount of $131,079; 3. Authorize the release of the Faithful Performance Bond 35 days after recordation of Notice of Completion and accept a Maintenance Guarantee Bond; 4. Authorize the release of the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of $121,309, six months after the recordation of said notice if no claims have been received; 5. Authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and release of the project retention, 35 days after recordation of Notice of Completion; and 6. Authorize the City Engineer to approve the release of the Maintenance Bond one year following the filing of the Notice of Completion if the improvements remain free from defects in material and workmanship. BACKGROUND: On June 2, 2021, the City Council awarded a construction contract to Elecnor Belco Electric, Inc., in the amount of $121,309 plus 10% contingency in the amount of $12,131 to address unforeseen construction related incidentals. A copy of the June 2, 2021, 2020, City Council Staff Report is on file with the City Clerk. A vicinity map is included as Attachment 1. The scope of work for the Project consisted of, but not limited to, installing solar powered flashing beacons; installing pavement striping and signage including ladder crosswalks; and related items of work per the Project’s plans. Page 73 Page 2 9 4 1 The Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds are provided to the City as entitlement grants from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (or HUD). On April 15, 2020, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council adopted the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan covering the period of July 1, 2020 to June 30, 2025. The four (4) core strategies of the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan include: Fair Housing Services Public Services Affordable Housing Preservation Public Facilities and Infrastructure Improvements. The proposed improvements align with the core strategies listed above as well as with the City’s Safe Routes to School Initiative goals and will benefit pedestrians, including school age youth, utilizing existing school crosswalks. Locations are outlined on the project plans and the vicinity map included as Attachment 1. ANALYSIS: The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The net increase in the total cost of the project is a result of three (3) Contractor Change Orders, including the balancing statement, and are summarized below: Change Order No.1: Furnishing and installation of eight (8) Caltrans Type 1-B Poles in lieu of the originally specified material. The Type-1B Poles will reduce future maintenance cost and secure a quality installation. The change in contract cost due to this change order is an increase of $7,317; Change Order No.2: Installation of additional R1-5 yield signs and post. Installation of anti-graffiti overlay film on all signs attached to the Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons. This overlay film will provide a layer of protection and reduce future maintenance cost. The change in contract cost due to this change order is an increase of $3,853; and Change Order No.32: The balancing statement for the project. The balancing statement conforms the final contract quantities to the actual quantities placed or constructed during the contract. The notable change is a decrease in the contract quantities amount of $1,400 resulting from a credit received for returning unused equipment. At the end of the one-year maintenance period, if the improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship, the City Clerk will release the Maintenance Bond upon approval by the City Engineer. FISCAL IMPACT: A total of $147,080 was budgeted in Fiscal Year 2020/21 from the Community Development Block grant (CDBG) Fund (Fund 204) which is identified under Capital Improvement Project Account No. and in the amount listed below. Account No.Funding Source Description Amount 1204314-5650/2015204-0 CDBG Fund (204)School Crosswalk Improvements $147,080 Total Project Funding =$147,080 Page 74 Page 3 9 4 1 The final project cost is $144,719 as shown below: e final project c A total of $2,361 remains in the budget for this project and will be returned to the Community Development Grant (CDBG) Fund (Fund 204), fund balances to be used for future capital improvement projects. COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: This project meets our City Council core values by promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community for all, and by providing improvement through the construction of high quality public improvements. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 - Vicinity Map Expenditure Amount Final Construction Contract $131,079 Construction Inspection Services $ 13,640 Total Project Cost =$144,719 Page 75 ATTACHMENT 1 SCHOOL CROSSWALK IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE Project Location 1 of 7: Archibald Ave and 9th St Project Location 2 of 7: Archibald Ave and Tryon St Project Location 3 of 7: Baker Ave and Salina St Project Location 4 of 7: Church St and Layton St Project Location 5 of 7: Baker Ave and 9th St Project Location 6 of 7: Feron Blvd and Villa Del Norte Driveway Project Location 7 of 7: Amethyst Ave and La Grande St Legend: = Project Location(s) Page 76 DATE:September 15, 2021 TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY:Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Romeo M. David, Associate Engineer SUBJECT:Consideration to Accept as Complete, File the Notice of Completion and Authorize Release of Retention and Bonds for the Hellman Avenue Sidewalk Improvements and ADA Ramps at Various Locations, Contract No. 2021-053. (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council: 1. Accept the Hellman Avenue Sidewalk Improvements and ADA ramps at Various Locations Project, Contract No. 2021-053 (Project), as complete; 2. Approve the final contract amount of $204,515; 3. Authorize the release of the Faithful Performance Bond 35 days after recordation of Notice of Completion and accept a Maintenance Guarantee Bond; 4. Authorize the release of the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of $204,350, six months after the recordation of said notice if no claims have been received; 5. Authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and release of the project retention, 35 days after recordation of Notice of Completion; and 6. Authorize the City Engineer to approve the release of the Maintenance Bond one year following the filing of the Notice of Completion if the improvements remain free from defects in material and workmanship. BACKGROUND: On June 2, 2021, the City Council awarded a construction contract to FS Contractors, Inc., in the amount of $204,350 plus 10% contingency in the amount of $20,435 to address unforeseen construction related incidentals. A copy of the June 2, 2021, 2020, City Council Staff Report is on file with the City Clerk. A vicinity map is included as Attachment 1. The scope of work consisted of constructing sidewalks, ADA ramps, curb and gutter, drive approaches, relocating signs, removing trees, planting 24” box trees, relocation of a water meter and service line, saw cutting and removing portions of a brick retaining wall, asphalt Page 77 Page 2 9 4 7 pavement driveway tie-ins, relocation of existing irrigation and controller valve boxes and related items of work per approved plans. Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds are provided to the City as entitlement grants from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (or HUD). On April 15, 2020, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council adopted the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan covering the period of July 1, 2020 to June 30, 2025. The four (4) core strategies of the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan include: Fair Housing Services Public Services Affordable Housing Preservation Public Facilities and Infrastructure Improvements The completion of sidewalk improvements on the northwest corner of Hellman Avenue and 9th Street as well as the ADA ramp improvements at four locations throughout the city align with the core strategies listed above as well as the City’s Safe Routes to School Initiative goals and will benefit pedestrians of all abilities. ANALYSIS: The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The net increase in the total cost of the project is a result of five (5) Contract Change Orders, including the final balancing statement are summarized below: Change Order No.1: Removal of interfering abandoned 15” diameter Reinforce Concrete Pipe underneath the grass and capping of each end of the pipe, approximately 35 feet in length. The change in contract cost due to this change order is an increase of $1,425.00; Change Order No.2: Removal and replacement of existing signs to standard height. The change in contract cost due to this change order is an increase of $2,100.00; Change Order No.3: Installation of a new backflow cage to protect backflow device. The change in contract cost due to this change order is an increase of $1,800.00; Change Order No.4: Installation of new cobble rock paving to re-route pedestrians to the new path of travel. The change in contract cost due to this change order is an increase of $1,800.00; Change Order No.5: The balancing statement for the project. The balancing statement conforms the final contract quantities to the actual quantities placed or constructed during the contract. The notable change is a decrease in the contract quantities amount of ($6,960) resulting from a reduction in cost associated with the line item for pedestrian push buttons. At the end of the one-year maintenance period, if the improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship, the City Clerk will release the Maintenance Bond upon approval by the City Engineer. Page 78 Page 3 9 4 7 FISCAL IMPACT: A total of $238,425 was budgeted in Fiscal Year 2020/21 from the Community Development Block grant (CDBG) Fund (Fund 204) which is identified under Capital Improvement Project Account No. and in the amount listed below: Account No.Funding Source Description Amount 12043145650/201204-0 CDBG Fund (204)Hellman Avenue Sidewalk Improvements and ADA ramps at Various Locations $ 238,425 Total Project Funding =$238,425 The final project cost is $218,155 as shown below: A total of $20,270 remains in the budget for this project and will be returned to the Community Development Grant (CDBG) Fund (Fund 204), fund balances to be used for future capital improvement projects. COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: This item addresses the City Council's Core Values by ensuring the construction of high-quality public improvements that promote success as a world class community. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 - Vicinity Map Expenditure Amount Final Construction Contract $204,515 Construction Inspection Services $ 13,640 Total Project Cost =$218,155 Page 79 Hellman Avenue Sidewalk Improvements and ADA Ramps Vicinity Map NOT TO SCALE Project Site Hellman Ave Sidewalk Project Site Ramps @ Layton St and Church Street and Ramps @ Tryon St and Archibald Ave Ramps @ Archibald Ave and 9th Street Ramps @ Amethyst Ave and La Grande ATTACHMENT 1Page80 DATE:September 15, 2021 TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY:Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Annette Cano-Soza, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT:Consideration to Accept Public Improvements Located in the Village Commercial (VC) District of the Victoria Planned Community, South of Attwood Court and West of Victoria Park Lane, Related to Case No. DRC2017-00889, as Complete, File the Notice of Completion, and Authorize Release of Bonds. (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council: 1. Approve and accept the public improvements and their design, required for the development of Case No. DRC2017-00889 and authorize the City Engineer to file the appropriate Notice of Completion; 2. Release Faithful Performance Bond No. 491495S for the associated public improvements; 3. Release the Labor and Material Bond No. 491495S; and 4. Waive the maintenance bond requirement. BACKGROUND: Case No. DRC2017-00889 was approved by the Planning Commission on July 26, 2018 to construct a childcare facility and outdoor play areas in the Village Commercial (VC) District of the Victoria Planned Community, located south of Atwood Court and west of Victoria Park Lane. An improvement agreement and securities were approved by the City Council on April 17, 2019, to ensure construction of the required public improvements. ANALYSIS: All public improvements required of this development have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Prior to construction of the public improvements the developer, Victoria Park Preschool LLC, a California Limited Liability Company, submitted the following securities to ensure satisfactory completion of the improvements: Faithful Performance Cash Bond $12,900 Bond #491495S Labor and Materials Cash Bond $12,900 Bond #491495S Page 81 Page 2 9 3 3 City staff conducted a final inspection of the public improvements in April of 2020 and confirmed all work was completed to City standards. The developer did not provide a maintenance bond to the City; therefore, the Faithful Performance Bond was retained for the satisfactory period (one year from the final inspection). City staff has confirmed the improvements have remained in good workmanship and free of defects, City staff recommends the maintenance bond requirement be waived. With completion of the improvements, the Faithful Performance and Labor and Materials bonds are no longer required. FISCAL IMPACT: None. COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: This item addresses the City Council’s vision for the City by ensuring the maintenance of high- quality public improvements that promote a world class community. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 - Vicinity Map Page 82 ATTACHMENT 1 1 6 0 7 DRC2017-00889 Vicinity Map NOT TO SCALE Project Site Page 83 DATE:September 15, 2021 TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY:Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Linda C. Ceballos, Environmental Programs Manager SUBJECT:Consideration of a Resolution to Set Residential Bear Resistant Container Solid Waste Rate Within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021-099) (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution approving the proposed solid waste rate for residential bear resistant container within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. BACKGROUND: Over the last three months a number of residents have contacted the City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) seeking options to address the bears in their neighborhood that are opening trash containers, causing damage to their trash containers, and leaving trash on the street, particularly on trash day. The City partnered with the franchise waste hauler, Burrtec Waste Industries, Inc. (Burrtec) and requested Burrtec to provide the City with a rate proposal for a new optional add- on rate that would provide residents that live in wildlife interface areas with the ability to request a bear resistant trash container, at an additional cost to the standard service rate. The container includes a heavy top and lock that deter bears and other wildlife from opening the trash barrels. Staff consulted with the City attorney and it was determined that a voluntary/optional new rate, requires City Council approval, however, does not require a public hearing or a Proposition 218 notice. The bear resistant container fee was not included in the 2021 Rate Adjustment because the resident phone calls requesting bear resistant containers were received after the public hearing notice had been distributed. If approved, this fee will be included in any future solid waste rate adjustments. ANALYSIS: Bear resistant containers cost $300-$400 each versus $50-$60 for a standard residential trash container. In addition to the higher container cost, Burrtec has found that the gravity-fed lids of the bear resistant containers do not always open when serviced, requiring the driver to get out of the vehicle to unlatch the lid prior to service. Burrtec proposed an add-on rate of $15.10 per month. A customer requesting a bear resistant containers would pay the established fee, in addition to the standard residential solid waste rate. This fee has taken into account the additional cost of the bear resistant container, the added cost to service the bear resistant container when it fails to open, and replacement cost of the bear resistant container if damaged by a bear or if the container lock or lid fails, as well as the franchise fee and hazmat fee. This fee does not replace the standard Page 84 Page 2 9 5 0 residential rate. It is an additional rate that a customer would be charged monthly, if they requested a bear resistant container. Staff reviewed the bear resistant container rates that have been adopted by the City of Fontana and County of San Bernardino unincorporated area of Forest Falls and found that the proposed rate has a similar rate structure and is within reason for the service to be provided. If approved, the proposed rate would become effective October 1, 2021. FISCAL IMPACT: The City receives a franchise fee from Burrtec, which is paid quarterly, and equals to fifteen percent (15%) of the gross receipts received by Burrtec. COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: This item relates to the Council Core Value of promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community for all. It is important to deter wildlife such as bears, and coyotes, but also the safety of our residents and keeping a clean community. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 - Resolution 2021-099 Page 85 RESOLUTION NO. 21-XXX - Page 1 of 1 RESOLUTION NO. 21-XXXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SETTING RESIDENTIAL BEAR RESISTANT CONTAINER FOR SOLID WASTE WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has previously adopted Chapter 8.17 of Title 8 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code establishing Solid Waste Service Rules and Regulations and authorizing that the rates, fees and charges arising, directly or indirectly, under said legislation be adopted pursuant to resolution, and thereafter, be amended from time to time by resolution; and WHEREAS, based upon the amount of the rate changes requested and the information provided by Burrtec pursuant to Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Sections 8.17.040 and 8.17.030, the City Council has determined that such changes are justified and appropriate; and WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. A. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find and resolve as follows: Section 1. The facts set forth in the Recitals, of this Resolution, are true and correct. Section 2.The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby approve the proposed monthly rate for bear resistant collection containers as follows: Bear Resistant Container: $15.10 Section 3.This is an optional service for the resident and is in addition to the standard residential service rate. Section 4.The proposed rate will become effective October 1, 2021. Section 5.This Resolution shall become effective once adopted. Section 6.The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 15 day of September, 2021. Page 86 5 DATE:September 15, 2021 TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY:Robert Neiuber, Human Resources Director Lucy Alvarez-Nunez, Management Analyst I SUBJECT:Consideration of a Resolution Approving an Amendment to the Rancho Cucamonga City Employees Association Salary Schedule for Fiscal Year 2021-2022, Including the Addition of Supervising Traffic Systems Specialist Classification. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021-105) (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council adopt the attached resolution amending the Rancho Cucamonga City Employees Association salary schedule for fiscal year 2021-2022 to include the addition of Supervising Traffic Systems Specialist classification. BACKGROUND: The City Council traditionally adopts salary resolutions biannually for classifications employed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. These resolutions are updated to reflect changes in salaries, additions and deletions of classifications, changes in job titles and other terms of employment. ANALYSIS: The City recently conducted two unsuccessful recruitments for the position of Maintenance Supervisor for the Signal and Lighting division. As a result, the City conducted a classification and compensation study for this position. The study results showed the salary range is 9% below market. The City and representatives of the Rancho Cucamonga City Employees Association (RCCEA) negotiated and agreed upon a change in title to Supervising Traffic Systems Specialist. The change in title more accurately reflects the position’s current job duties and specialized knowledge. In addition, an adjustment of 7% above the Maintenance Supervisor salary range was included to bring the position closer to market range. Staff anticipates this upgrade will yield a stronger applicant pool in the upcoming recruitment for the position. The attached RCCEA salary schedule includes the addition of Supervising Traffic Systems Specialist classification. All other salary schedules, classifications, job titles, and other terms of employment remain the same. Staff recommends the City Council approve the resolution updating the RCCEA salary schedule to include the addition of the Supervising Traffic Systems Specialist classification. Page 87 Page 2 9 3 5 FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact is anticipated. The salary adjustments can be absorbed by filling the position at a lower salary step. COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: This item addresses the City’s core values of working towards continuous improvement by adjusting the position and salary to reflect the current market conditions and the operational needs of the City. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 – Resolution No. 2021-105 Attachment 2 - Rancho Cucamonga Employees Association Salary Schedule Page 88 ATTACHMENT 1 1 6 1 7 RESOLUTION NO. 2021-XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION SALARY SCHEDULE FOR FISCAL YEAR 2021-2022, INCLUDING THE ADDITION OF SUPERVISING TRAFFIC SYSTEMS SPECIALIST CLASSIFICATION. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has determined that it is necessary for the efficient operation and management of the City that policies be established prescribing salary ranges, benefits and holidays and other policies for employees of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has previously adopted salary resolutions establishing salary ranges, benefits and other terms of employment for employees of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga recognizes that it is necessary from time to time to amend the salary resolution to accommodate changes in position titles, classifications salary ranges, benefits and other terms of employment including an outline of State and Federally required benefits afforded to part-time employees; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California to approve the attached amended salary schedule for the Rancho Cucamonga City Employees Association (Attachment 2) effective September 15, 2021. PASSED, APROVED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of September 2021. Page 89 Minimum Control Point Maximum Class Title Step Amount Step Amount Step Amount Account Clerk 4375 $3,055 4415 $3,730 4435 $4,121 Account Technician 4423 $3,881 4463 $4,737 4483 $5,235 Accountant#3465 $4,786 3505 $5,842 3525 $6,454 Accounts Payable Supervisor#3470 $4,906 3510 $5,989 3530 $6,618 Administrative Assistant 4369 $2,965 4409 $3,619 4429 $3,999 Administrative Technician 4437 $4,163 4477 $5,081 4497 $5,613 Animal Behavior Specialist 4388 $3,259 4428 $3,979 4448 $4,397 Animal Care Attendant 4349 $2,684 4389 $3,276 4409 $3,619 Animal Care Supervisor#3440 $4,225 3480 $5,156 3500 $5,698 Animal Caretaker 4378 $3,102 4418 $3,785 4438 $4,182 Animal Rescue Specialist 4388 $3,259 4428 $3,979 4448 $4,397 Animal Services Dispatcher 4369 $2,965 4409 $3,619 4429 $3,999 Animal Services Officer I 4421 $3,843 4461 $4,691 4481 $5,183 Animal Services Officer II 4441 $4,245 4481 $5,183 4501 $5,727 Artistic Producer - Mainstreet Theatre Company 4450 $4,441 4490 $5,421 4510 $5,989 Assistant Engineer#3488 $5,366 3528 $6,551 3548 $7,239 Assistant Planner#3468 $4,858 3508 $5,930 3528 $6,551 Associate Engineer#3518 $6,233 3558 $7,608 3578 $8,407 Associate Planner#3487 $5,340 3527 $6,520 3547 $7,203 Box Office Coordinator 4450 $4,441 4490 $5,421 4510 $5,989 Budget Analyst#3515 $6,140 3555 $7,495 3575 $8,281 Building Inspection Supervisor#2 3504 $5,812 3544 $7,096 3564 $7,840 Building Inspector I2 4444 $4,308 4484 $5,260 4504 $5,812 Building Inspector II2 4464 $4,761 4504 $5,812 4524 $6,422 Business License Clerk 4378 $3,102 4418 $3,785 4438 $4,182 Business License Inspector 4418 $3,785 4458 $4,621 4478 $5,106 Business License Program Coordinator#3432 $4,060 3472 $4,954 3492 $5,474 Business License Program Supervisor#3470 $4,906 3510 $5,989 3530 $6,618 Business License Technician 4408 $3,602 4448 $4,397 4468 $4,858 City Clerk Records Management Analyst#3470 $4,906 3510 $5,989 3530 $6,618 Community Affairs Coordinator 4450 $4,441 4490 $5,421 4510 $5,989 Community Affairs Officer#3515 $6,140 3555 $7,495 3575 $8,281 Community Affairs Senior Coordinator#3480 $5,156 3520 $6,296 3540 $6,956 Community Affairs Specialist 4350 $2,696 4390 $3,292 4410 $3,637 Community Affairs Technician 4437 $4,163 4477 $5,081 4497 $5,613 Monthly Pay Ranges Effective September 15, 2021 Resolution No. 2021-XXX SUPERVISORY/PROFESSIONAL AND GENERAL EMPLOYEES GROUPS ASSIGNMENTS OF CLASSIFICATIONS TO PAY RANGES RCCEA COVERED EMPLOYEES IN THE ATTACHMENT 2Page90 Minimum Control Point Maximum Monthly Pay Ranges Effective September 15, 2021 Resolution No. 2021-XXX SUPERVISORY/PROFESSIONAL AND GENERAL EMPLOYEES GROUPS ASSIGNMENTS OF CLASSIFICATIONS TO PAY RANGES RCCEA COVERED EMPLOYEES IN THE Community Development Technician I 4413 $3,691 4453 $4,507 4473 $4,980 Community Development Technician II 4423 $3,881 4463 $4,737 4483 $5,235 Community Improvement Supervisor#2 3504 $5,812 3544 $7,096 3564 $7,840 Community Improvement Officer I 4421 $3,843 4461 $4,691 4481 $5,183 Community Improvement Officer II 4441 $4,245 4481 $5,183 4501 $5,727 Community Programs Coordinator 4450 $4,441 4490 $5,421 4510 $5,989 Community Programs Specialist 4437 $4,163 4477 $5,081 4497 $5,613 Community Services Coordinator 4450 $4,441 4490 $5,421 4510 $5,989 Community Services Project Coordinator#3500 $5,698 3540 $6,956 3560 $7,684 Community Services Specialist 4350 $2,696 4390 $3,292 4410 $3,637 Community Services Supervisor#3480 $5,156 3520 $6,296 3540 $6,956 Community Services Technician 4437 $4,163 4477 $5,081 4497 $5,613 Community Theater Producer 4450 $4,441 4490 $5,421 4510 $5,989 Customer Care Assistant 4349 $2,684 4409 $3,619 4429 $3,999 Customer Service Representative 4378 $3,102 4418 $3,785 4438 $4,182 Deputy City Clerk#3430 $4,019 3470 $4,906 3490 $5,421 Engineering Aide 4421 $3,843 4461 $4,691 4481 $5,183 Engineering Technician 4441 $4,245 4481 $5,183 4501 $5,727 Environmental Programs Coordinator#3503 $5,783 3543 $7,061 3563 $7,801 Environmental Programs Inspector2 4464 $4,761 4504 $5,812 4524 $6,422 Event & Rental Services Coordinator 4450 $4,441 4490 $5,421 4510 $5,989 Executive Assistant II#3444 $4,308 3484 $5,260 3504 $5,812 Executive Assistant1 4394 $3,359 4464 $4,761 4484 $5,260 Fleet Supervisor#2 3488 $5,366 3528 $6,551 3548 $7,239 Front of House Coordinator 4450 $4,441 4490 $5,421 4510 $5,989 Fund Development Coordinator#3470 $4,906 3510 $5,989 3530 $6,618 GIS Analyst#3505 $5,842 3545 $7,132 3565 $7,878 GIS Specialist 4456 $4,576 4496 $5,585 4516 $6,171 GIS Supervisor#3535 $6,785 3575 $8,281 3595 $9,150 GIS Technician 4436 $4,140 4476 $5,054 4496 $5,585 Human Resources Business Partner#3433 $4,079 3473 $4,980 3493 $5,503 Human Resources Clerk 4389 $3,276 4429 $3,999 4449 $4,418 Human Resources Technician 4408 $3,602 4448 $4,397 4468 $4,858 Information Technology Analyst I#3505 $5,842 3545 $7,132 3565 $7,878 Information Technology Analyst II#3520 $6,296 3560 $7,684 3580 $8,489 Information Technology Specialist I 4456 $4,576 4496 $5,585 4516 $6,171 ATTACHMENT 2Page91 Minimum Control Point Maximum Monthly Pay Ranges Effective September 15, 2021 Resolution No. 2021-XXX SUPERVISORY/PROFESSIONAL AND GENERAL EMPLOYEES GROUPS ASSIGNMENTS OF CLASSIFICATIONS TO PAY RANGES RCCEA COVERED EMPLOYEES IN THE Information Technology Specialist II 4471 $4,931 4511 $6,019 4531 $6,650 Information Technology Technician 4411 $3,655 4451 $4,461 4471 $4,931 Lead Park Ranger 4421 $3,843 4461 $4,691 4481 $5,183 Librarian I# 3435 $4,121 3475 $5,031 3495 $5,558 Librarian II#3457 $4,598 3497 $5,613 3517 $6,203 Library Assistant I#3373 $3,023 3413 $3,691 3433 $4,079 Library Assistant II#3414 $3,711 3454 $4,530 3474 $5,005 Library Clerk 4356 $2,778 4396 $3,392 4416 $3,747 Library Technician 4393 $3,341 4433 $4,079 4453 $4,507 Maintenance Supervisor#2 3488 $5,366 3528 $6,551 3548 $7,239 Management Aide 4440 $4,225 4480 $5,156 4500 $5,698 Management Analyst I#3470 $4,906 3510 $5,989 3530 $6,618 Management Analyst II#3498 $5,641 3538 $6,888 3558 $7,608 Management Analyst III#3515 $6,140 3555 $7,495 3575 $8,281 Office Services Clerk 4369 $2,965 4409 $3,619 4429 $3,999 Patron & Events Supervisor#3480 $5,156 3520 $6,296 3540 $6,956 Payroll Supervisor#3470 $4,906 3510 $5,989 3530 $6,618 Planning Specialist 4443 $4,287 4483 $5,235 4503 $5,783 Planning Technician 4423 $3,881 4463 $4,737 4483 $5,235 Plans Examiner I 4474 $5,005 4514 $6,110 4534 $6,751 Plans Examiner II#3488 $5,366 3528 $6,551 3548 $7,239 Procurement & Contracts Analyst#3433 $4,079 3473 $4,980 3493 $5,503 Procurement Clerk 4374 $3,040 4414 $3,711 4434 $4,100 Procurement Technician 4411 $3,655 4451 $4,461 4471 $4,931 Public Services Technician I 4413 $3,691 4453 $4,507 4473 $4,980 Public Services Technician II 4423 $3,881 4463 $4,737 4483 $5,235 Public Services Technician III 4443 $4,287 4483 $5,235 4503 $5,783 Public Works Inspector I2 4444 $4,308 4484 $5,260 4504 $5,812 Public Works Inspector II2 4464 $4,761 4504 $5,812 4524 $6,422 Public Works Safety Coordinator #2 3468 $4,858 3508 $5,930 3528 $6,551 Records Clerk 4358 $2,806 4398 $3,426 4418 $3,785 Records Coordinator 4386 $3,226 4426 $3,940 4446 $4,352 Risk Management Coordinator#3470 $4,906 3510 $5,989 3530 $6,618 Senior Account Clerk 4395 $3,375 4435 $4,121 4455 $4,552 Senior Account Technician 4446 $4,352 4486 $5,314 4506 $5,872 Senior Accountant#3498 $5,641 3538 $6,888 3558 $7,608 ATTACHMENT 2Page92 Minimum Control Point Maximum Monthly Pay Ranges Effective September 15, 2021 Resolution No. 2021-XXX SUPERVISORY/PROFESSIONAL AND GENERAL EMPLOYEES GROUPS ASSIGNMENTS OF CLASSIFICATIONS TO PAY RANGES RCCEA COVERED EMPLOYEES IN THE Senior Animal Services Officer#3461 $4,691 3501 $5,727 3521 $6,327 Senior Building Inspector#2 3484 $5,260 3524 $6,422 3544 $7,096 Senior Business License Clerk 4398 $3,426 4438 $4,182 4458 $4,621 Senior Community Improvement Officer#3461 $4,691 3501 $5,727 3521 $6,327 Senior Electrician #3485 $5,288 3525 $6,454 3545 $7,132 Senior GIS Analyst #3520 $6,296 3560 $7,684 3580 $8,489 Senior Information Technology Analyst#3535 $6,785 3575 $8,281 3595 $9,150 Senior Information Technology Specialist#4493 $5,503 4533 $6,718 4553 $7,422 Senior Librarian#3468 $4,858 3508 $5,930 3528 $6,551 Senior Park Planner#3500 $5,698 3540 $6,956 3560 $7,684 Senior Plans Examiner#3503 $5,783 3543 $7,061 3563 $7,801 Senior Procurement Technician#3463 $4,737 3503 $5,783 3523 $6,390 Senior Risk Management Analyst#3515 $6,140 3555 $7,495 3575 $8,281 Senior Veterinary Technician#3461 $4,691 3501 $5,727 3521 $6,327 Special Districts Analyst#3498 $5,641 3538 $6,888 3558 $7,608 Supervising Public Works Inspector#2 3494 $5,529 3534 $6,751 3554 $7,458 Supervising Traffic Systems Specialist#2 3502 $5,755 3542 $7,026 3562 $7,762 Theater Production Coordinator 4460 $4,668 4500 $5,698 4520 $6,296 Theater Production Supervisor#3480 $5,156 3520 $6,296 3540 $6,956 Theatre Technician III 4423 $3,881 4463 $4,737 4483 $5,235 Utilities Operation Supervisor#3515 $6,140 3555 $7,495 3575 $8,281 Veterinary Assistant 4407 $3,583 4447 $4,375 4467 $4,833 Veterinary Technician 4437 $4,163 4477 $5,081 4497 $5,613 2. Refer to MOU for provision of boot # Denotes Supervisory/Professional Class 1. When acting as Clerk to Commissions $50 paid per night or weekend day meeting. Compensatory time off ATTACHMENT 2Page93 DATE:September 15, 2021 TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY:Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Annette Cano-Soza, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT:Consideration of the Improvement Agreement and Improvement Securities for Street Improvements, Order Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B, Street Light Maintenance Districts Nos. 1 and 6 for Case No. DRC2020-00026, Located at the Southwest Corner of 6th Street and Hyssop Drive. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021-101), (RESOLUTION NO. 2021-102), (RESOLUTION NO. 2021-103) (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council: 1. Approve an Improvement Agreement for related public improvements and authorize the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement; 2. Accept security in the form of bonds for completion of the related public improvements; and 3. Adopt the attached resolutions ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance Districts Nos. 1 and 6. BACKGROUND: On July 22, 2020, the Planning Commission approved Case No. DRC2020-00026 for the construction of a 22,870 square foot commercial warehouse shell building on a vacant site of 1.08 acres located within the General Industrial (GI) District, at the southwest corner of 6th St. and Hyssop Drive. Case No. DRC2020-00026 was approved subject to a condition that certain public improvements be constructed including; street lights, curb and gutter, street trees, sidewalk, and drive approaches. ANALYSIS: The developer, Chase Partners LTD has submitted an Improvement Agreement and securities to guarantee construction of the off-site public improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond No. 4448882 $90,400 Labor and Material Bond No. 4448882 $90,400 Approval of this item by Council would approve the Improvement Agreement, accept the securities for the construction of certain public improvements, and order the annexation into Landscape Page 94 Page 2 9 4 0 Maintenance District 3B and Street Light Maintenance Districts 1 and 6. Copies of the agreement and the Consent and Waiver to Annexation forms are on file in the City Clerk’s Office. FISCAL IMPACT: The proposed annexations would satisfy the conditions of approval for the development and supply additional annual revenue into the landscape and lighting maintenance districts in the following amounts: Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B $420.54 Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 $ 52.95 Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 $ 76.59 COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: This item addresses the City Council’s vision for the City by ensuring the construction of high- quality improvements that promote a world class community. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 - Vicinity Map Attachment 2 – Resolution Ordering Annexation LMD 3B Attachment 3 – Resolution Ordering Annexation SLD 1 Attachment 4 – Resolution Ordering Annexation SLD 6 Page 95 ATTACHMENT 1 1 6 3 6 Vicinity Map DRC2020-00026 NOT TO SCALE Project Site Page 96 Resolution No. 20XX-XXX – Page 1 of 5 ATTACHMENT 2 RESOLUTION NO. 20XX - XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B (COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL) FOR CASE NO. DRC2020-00026 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the “Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972”, being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the “Act”, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B (Commercial Industrial) (the “District”); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the Act authorize the annexation of additional territory to the District; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation of resolutions, and assessment engineer’s report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the Act related to the annexation of territory to the District, Article XIII D of the Constitution of the State of California (“Article XIII D”) establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the District on the territory proposed to be annexed to such District; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, have requested that such property (collectively, the “Territory”) be annexed to the District in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the “Improvements”); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled “Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property” (the “Consent and Waiver”); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the Act to the annexation of the Territory to the District and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the District; and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the Act and/or Article XIII D applicable to the authorization to levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization to levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and Page 97 Resolution No. 20XX-XXX – Page 2 of 5 1 6 3 8 WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly agreed for themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns that: (1) The proportionate special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the District Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance and operation expenses of the Improvements; (2) The proposed annual assessment does not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit from the Improvements conferred on each parcel in the Territory. (3) Only the special benefits derived or to be derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements have been included in the proposed annual assessment. WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the District and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvement. c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation the Territory to the District, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C. SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the District, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this day of 2021. Page 98 Resolution No. 20XX-XXX – Page 3 of 5 1 6 3 8 Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property to be Annexed The Owner of the Property is: CHASE PARTNERS LTD The legal description of the Property is: ROCHESTER PTN LOT 92 DESC AS COM ON N LI SD LOT 601.71 FT E OF NW COR SD LOT TH E 230.95 FT ALG SD N LI TO E LI HGWY AS DESC IN DEED RECORDED IN BK 7961 PG 865 O R TH S 0 DEG 11 MIN 09 SECONDS W ALG SD E LI 330.10 FT TO S LI SD LOT TH W ALG SD S LI TO E LI W 601.71 FT SD LOT TH N 330 FT TO POB EX PTN IN HGWY EX STS Assessor’s Parcels Numbers of the Property: 0229-284-03-0000 Page 99 Resolution No. 20XX-XXX – Page 4 of 5 1 6 3 8 Exhibit B Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2021/22 Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B (Commercial Industrial): Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B (Commercial Industrial) (the “Maintenance District”) represents landscape sites throughout the Commercial/Industrial Maintenance District. The various landscape sites that are maintained by this district consist of median islands, parkways, street trees and entry monuments. Proposed additions to the Improvements for Project Case No. DRC2020-00026: 8 landscape trees (15 gallon) to be installed along Hyssop Drive Page 100 Resolution No. 20XX-XXX – Page 5 of 5 1 6 3 8 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2021/22 Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B (Commercial Industrial): The rate per Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) is $282.24 for the fiscal year 2021/22. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B (Commercial Industrial) for Case No. DRC2020-00026: Land Use Basis EBU Factor* Rate per EBU* Non-Residential Acre 1.00 $282.24 The proposed annual assessment for the property described in Exhibit A is as follows: 1.49 Acres x 1 EBU Factor x $282.24 Rate per EBU = $420.54 Annual Assessment Page 101 Resolution No. 20XX-XXX – Page 1 of 5 ATTACHMENT 3 RESOLUTION NO. 20XX - XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS) FOR CASE NO. DRC2020-00026 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the “Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972”, being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the “Act”, said special maintenance district known and designated as Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets) (the “District”); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the Act authorize the annexation of additional territory to the District; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation of resolutions, and assessment engineer’s report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the Act related to the annexation of territory to the District, Article XIII D of the Constitution of the State of California (“Article XIII D”) establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the District on the territory proposed to be annexed to such District; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, have requested that such property (collectively, the “Territory”) be annexed to the District in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the “Improvements”); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled “Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property” (the “Consent and Waiver”); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the Act to the annexation of the Territory to the District and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the District; and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the Act and/or Article XIII D applicable to the authorization to levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization to levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and Page 102 Resolution No. 20XX-XXX – Page 2 of 5 1 6 4 0 WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly agreed for themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns that: (1) The proportionate special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the District Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance and operation expenses of the Improvements; (2) The proposed annual assessment does not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit from the Improvements conferred on each parcel in the Territory. (3) Only the special benefits derived or to be derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements have been included in the proposed annual assessment. WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the District and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvement. c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation the Territory to the District, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C. SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the District, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this day of 2021. Page 103 Resolution No. 20XX-XXX – Page 3 of 5 1 6 4 0 Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property to be Annexed The Owner of the Property is: CHASE PARTNERS LTD The legal description of the Property is: ROCHESTER PTN LOT 92 DESC AS COM ON N LI SD LOT 601.71 FT E OF NW COR SD LOT TH E 230.95 FT ALG SD N LI TO E LI HGWY AS DESC IN DEED RECORDED IN BK 7961 PG 865 O R TH S 0 DEG 11 MIN 09 SECONDS W ALG SD E LI 330.10 FT TO S LI SD LOT TH W ALG SD S LI TO E LI W 601.71 FT SD LOT TH N 330 FT TO POB EX PTN IN HGWY EX STS Assessor’s Parcels Numbers of the Property: 0229-284-03-0000 Page 104 Resolution No. 20XX-XXX – Page 4 of 5 1 6 4 0 Exhibit B Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2021/22 Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets): Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets) (the “Maintenance District”) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. These sites consist of several non-contiguous areas throughout the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City. Proposed additions to the Improvements for Project Case No. DRC2020-00026: NONE. Page 105 Resolution No. 20XX-XXX – Page 5 of 5 1 6 4 0 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2021/22 Street Light Maintenance District No.1 (Arterial Streets): The rate per Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) is $17.77 for the fiscal year 2021/22. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No.1 (Arterial Streets) for Case No. DRC2020-00026: Land Use Basis EBU Factor* Rate per EBU* Single Family Residential Parcel 1.00 $17.77 Multi-Family Residential Parcel 1.00 17.77 Non-Residential Acre 2.00 17.77 The proposed annual assessment for the property described in Exhibit A is as follows: 1.49 Acres x 2 EBU Factor x $17.77 Rate per EBU = $52.95 Annual Assessment Page 106 Resolution No. 20XX-XXX – Page 1 of 5 ATTACHMENT 4 1 6 3 9 RESOLUTION NO. 20XX - XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 (COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL) FOR CASE NO. DRC2020-00026 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the “Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972”, being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the “Act”, said special maintenance district known and designated as Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial Industrial)(the “District”); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the Act authorize the annexation of additional territory to the District; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation of resolutions, and assessment engineer’s report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the Act related to the annexation of territory to the District, Article XIII D of the Constitution of the State of California (“Article XIII D”) establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the District on the territory proposed to be annexed to such District; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, have requested that such property (collectively, the “Territory”) be annexed to the District in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the “Improvements”); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled “Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property” (the “Consent and Waiver”); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the Act to the annexation of the Territory to the District and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the District; and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the Act and/or Article XIII D applicable to the authorization to levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization to levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and Page 107 Resolution No. 20XX-XXX – Page 2 of 5 1 6 3 9 WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly agreed for themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns that: (1) The proportionate special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the District Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance and operation expenses of the Improvements; (2) The proposed annual assessment does not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit from the Improvements conferred on each parcel in the Territory. (3) Only the special benefits derived or to be derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements have been included in the proposed annual assessment. WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the District and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvement. c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation the Territory to the District, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C. SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the District, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this day of 2021. Page 108 Resolution No. 20XX-XXX – Page 3 of 5 1 6 3 9 Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property to be Annexed The Owner of the Property is: CHASE PARTNERS LTD The legal description of the Property is: ROCHESTER PTN LOT 92 DESC AS COM ON N LI SD LOT 601.71 FT E OF NW COR SD LOT TH E 230.95 FT ALG SD N LI TO E LI HGWY AS DESC IN DEED RECORDED IN BK 7961 PG 865 O R TH S 0 DEG 11 MIN 09 SECONDS W ALG SD E LI 330.10 FT TO S LI SD LOT TH W ALG SD S LI TO E LI W 601.71 FT SD LOT TH N 330 FT TO POB EX PTN IN HGWY EX STS Assessor’s Parcels Numbers of the Property: 0229-284-03-0000 Page 109 Resolution No. 20XX-XXX – Page 4 of 5 1 6 3 9 Exhibit B Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2021/22 Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial Industrial): Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (the “Maintenance District”) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on commercial and industrial streets throughout the City but excluding those areas already in a local maintenance district. Generally, this area encompasses the industrial area of the City south of Foothill Boulevard The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on industrial or commercial streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on industrial or commercial streets generally south of Foothill Boulevard. Proposed additions to the Improvements for Project Case No. DRC2020-00026: 2 street lights to be installed along Hyssop Drive Page 110 Resolution No. 20XX-XXX – Page 5 of 5 1 6 3 9 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2021/22 Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial Industrial): The rate per Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) is $51.40 for the fiscal year 2021/22. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial Industrial) for Case No. DRC2020-00026: Land Use Basis EBU Factor* Rate per EBU* Commercial/ Industrial Acre 1.00 $51.40 The proposed annual assessment for the property described in Exhibit A is as follows: 1.49 Acres x 1 EBU Factor x $51.40 Rate per EBU = $76.59 Annual Assessment Page 111 DATE:September 15, 2021 TO:President and Members of the Board of Directors FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY:Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services SUBJECT:Consideration of Resolutions of the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, Rancho Cucamonga, California, Amending Resolutions FD 2021-009, 2021-010, and 2021-011, and Approving Covenants and Restrictions for Real Property Pursuant to Government Code Section 54233.5. (RESOLUTION NOS. FD 2021-029, FD 2021-030 AND FD 2021-031) (FIRE) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Fire District Board adopt the resolutions. BACKGROUND: The Fire District is the owner in fee simple of certain real properties (“Properties”) located at the following locations:  San Bernardino Road Fire Station – This .47-acre property is located on the north side of San Bernardino Road, west of Archibald Avenue. The fire station is obsolete and has been replaced by the new Public Safety Facility further west of this location. The site is owned by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District.  San Bernardino Road properties – The Fire District also owns two (2) undeveloped properties further west on San Bernardino Road: 9547 San Bernardino Road (.81 acres) and 9561 San Bernardino Road (.56 acres). Under the Surplus Land Act, Government Code Sections 54220-54233 (“Act”), surplus land is land owned in fee simple by the District for which the Fire Board takes formal action in a regular public meeting declaring the land is surplus and not necessary for the agency’s use. The Act provides that land shall be declared either surplus land or exempt surplus land before the agency may take action to dispose of it consistent with the agency’s policies or procedures. That action was taken by the Fire Board through adoption of resolutions in December 2020. The Act requires that before the Fire District Board disposes of any of these properties or engages in negotiations to dispose of these properties, the District must send a written notice of availability (“NOA”) of the properties, which includes the location and a description of each property, to certain designated entities. These notices were sent on December 17, 2020. One (1) affordable housing provider, Volunteers of America Los Angeles (VOALA), responded to the NOA and expressed interest in all six (6) properties. Negotiations continued through May 16, 2021, but price and terms were not reached with VOALA for any of the parcels. Page 112 Page 2 9 5 9 The Surplus Land Act provides that if the entity does not agree to price and terms with a designated entity or if no designated entity responds to the NOA, the District can proceed to sell or lease these properties to any entity. However, if ten or more residential units are developed on a property, not less than 15% of the total residential units developed on a property must be made available at an affordable housing cost or affordable rent to low-income households pursuant to a covenant recorded against the land. Subsequently, in June of 2021, the Fire District Board adopted Resolutions FD 2021-009, 2021- 010, and 2021-011 placing the required affordable housing covenants on the parcels. ANALYSIS: Following the Board’s approval of the covenants in June, the required documentation was submitted to the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD). After their review, they requested that the covenant language be modified to include language specific to the requirements placed on special districts, which is slightly different than the language required in the covenants for cities. Substantively, the requirements are virtually the same. The proposed resolutions will amend the prior resolutions and replace the prior covenants with the required language. These amended resolutions and the amended covenants will be recorded on the properties. With this action, the surplus process on these three parcels will be complete. FISCAL IMPACT: None COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: This action is in keeping with the Council’s vision to creating an equitable, sustainable, and vibrant city, by setting the stage for the appropriate, high-quality reuse of these properties in the future. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 – Resolution FD 2021 – 029 re: 9561 San Bernardino Road Attachment 2 – Resolution FD 2021 – 030 re: 9547 San Bernardino Road Attachment 3 – Resolution FD 2021 – 031 re: 9612 San Bernardino Road Page 113 ATTACHMENT 1 11231-0001\2481928v1.doc RESOLUTION NO. ______ A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA APPROVING COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS ON REAL PROPERTY PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54233.5 FOR THAT REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 9561 SAN BERNARDINO ROAD, AND AMENDING AND REPLACING RESOLUTION NO. FD 2021-009 WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (“District”) is the owner in fee simple of that certain real property described in Exhibit “A,” attached hereto and made a part of hereof (“Property”); and WHEREAS, the Property is vacant property located at 9561 San Bernardino Road, which the District is no longer expected to use or need as of January 1, 2021; and WHEREAS, District staff has evaluated the Property for its potential to be used for District work or operations after the District discontinues use of the Property; and WHEREAS, District staff has determined that the Property is not suitable for the District’s use after the District discontinues use of the Property; and WHEREAS, the Fire Board has previously adopted Resolution FD2020-026, declaring that the Property is surplus land and not necessary for the District’s use; and WHEREAS, in December of 2021 the District sent written notices of availability of the Property to certain designated entities, but negotiations did not result in the sale of the Property; and WHEREAS, the Fire Board previously adopted Resolution FD2021-009, approving covenants and restrictions on real property pursuant to Government Code Section 54233 for this parcel, but was directed by the California Department of Housing and Community Development to replace this covenant with the language included in this resolution which is in accordance with Government Code Section 54233.5; NOW, THEREFORE, THE FIRE DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1.The above recitals are true and correct and are a substantive part of this Resolution. Section 2.Resolution FD2021-009 is hereby amended and replaced by this Resolution. Page 114 -2- 1 6 6 6 Section 3.The Fire District Board of Directors hereby approves the Covenants and Restrictions for Real Property, attached as Exhibit B. Section 4.The officers and staff of the District are hereby authorized, jointly and severally, to do all things which they may deem necessary or proper to effectuate the purposes of this Resolution, and any such actions previously taken are hereby ratified and confirmed. Such actions include negotiating in good faith in accordance with the requirements of the Act with any of the Designated Entities that submit a written notice of interest to purchase or lease the Property in compliance with the Act. Section 5.The Clerk of the Board shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. Page 115 -3- 1 6 6 6 Exhibit A Legal Description THE WEST 76 FEET OF THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 7 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 4 OF MAPS, PAGE 9, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 3, 10 CHAINS WEST OF THE SOUTHEAST CORN ER THEREOF; THENCE WEST 5 CHAINS; THENCE AT RIGHT ANGLES NORTH 10 CHAINS, MORE OR LESS, TO THE SOUTH LINE OF A ROAD LEADING FROM CUCAMONGA SCHOOL HOUSE TO SAN BERNARDINO; THENCE EAST ALONG SAID ROAD TO A POINT DUE NORTH OF THE POINT OF COMMENCEMENT; THENCE SOUTH TO THE POINT OF COMMENCEMENT. EXCEPTING THEREFROM: (A) BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF THE STATE HIGHWAY, WHICH POINT IS NORTH 0° 08' WEST 30 FEET FROM A POINT WHICH IS SOUTH 89° 54' WEST 660 FEET FROM THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 3; THENCE NORTH 0° 08' WEST 341 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89° 54' WEST 330 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 0° 08' EAST 341 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89° 54' EAST 330 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. (B) COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE TRACT OF LAND AS DESCRIBED IN THE DEED TO ALVIN C. BURKHOLDER, ET UX, RECORDED AUGUST 20, 1947, AS RECORDER'S DAILY INSTRUMENT NO. 35, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER; THENCE WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF A ROAD LEADING FROM CUCAMONGA SCHOOL HOUSE TO SAN BERNARDINO, 126 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL OF LAND HEREIN DESCRIBED; Page 116 -4- 1 6 6 6 Legal Description – Page 2 THENCE WEST ALONG SAID ROAD, 128 FEET; THENCE SOUTH AND PARALLEL TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID BURKHOLDER TRACT, 136 FEET; THENCE AT RIGHT ANGLES EAST 128 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO A POINT DUE SOUTH OF THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. Page 117 -5- 1 6 6 6 EXHIBIT B RECORDING REQUESTED BY, AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: City of Rancho Cucamonga Attn: City Clerk 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 RE: APN 0208-151-17 Exempt from recording fees pursuant to Government Code Section 6103. (Space above for Recorder’s use.) COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR REAL PROPERTY (per Government Code Section 54233.5) These COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR REAL PROPERTY is executed as of September 15, 2021, by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District ("Owner"). RECITALS WHEREAS, Owner is the owner of certain real property located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, California as is described in the legal description in the attached and incorporated Exhibit A ("the Property"); WHEREAS, Assembly Bill 1486 amended the Surplus Land Act (Government Code Section 54220 et. seq.) and created new obligations before a local agency may dispose of surplus land; WHEREAS, the Surplus Land Act designates the California State Department of Housing and Community Development ("HCD") with oversight with respect to a local agency's compliance with the Surplus Land Act; and WHEREAS, HCD requires that certain affordability covenants and restrictions be recorded against surplus land as set forth in Government Code Section 54233.5 prior to its disposition. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, the Owner declares as follows: A. Where local zoning permits development of 10 or more residential units or is rezoned within five years of the disposal to permit the development of 10 or more residential units, and ten (10) or more residential units are developed on the property described on Exhibit "A" attached Page 118 -6- 1 6 6 6 hereto then not less than 15 percent of the total number of residential units developed on the property shall be sold or rented at an affordable housing cost, as defined in Section 50052.5 of the California Health and Safety Code, or affordable rent, as defined in Section 50053 of the California Health and Safety Code, to lower-income households, as defined in Section 50079.5 of the California Health and Safety Code. Rental units shall remain affordable to and occupied by lower- income households for a period of 55 years for rental housing and 45 years for ownership housing. The initial occupants of all ownership units shall be lower-income households, and the units shall be subject to an equity sharing agreement consistent with the provisions of paragraph (2) of subdivision (c) of 65915 of the California Government Code. B. These requirements shall be covenants and restrictions running with the land and shall be enforceable against any owner who violates a covenant or restriction and each successor-in- interest who continues the violation by any of the entities described in subdivisions (a) to (f), inclusive, of Section 54222.5 of the California Government Code. C. The Restrictions and Covenants set forth herein are intended not to merge into the Owner's fee simple title to the Property, but become effective when the Property is conveyed by the current Owner (i.e. Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District). IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this Covenants and Restrictions for Real Property to be signed by its duly authorized representatives, as of the day and year first above written. OWNER: RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT John Gillison, City Manager ATTEST: Page 119 ATTACHMENT 2 11231-0001\2481928v1.doc RESOLUTION NO. ______ A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA APPROVING COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS ON REAL PROPERTY PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54233.5 FOR THAT REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 9547 SAN BERNARDINO ROAD, AND AMENDING AND REPLACING RESOLUTION FD2021-010 WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (“District”) is the owner in fee simple of that certain real property described in Exhibit “A,” attached hereto and made a part of hereof (“Property”); and WHEREAS, the Property is vacant property located at 9547 San Bernardino Road, which the District is no longer expected to use or need as of January 1, 2021; and WHEREAS, District staff has evaluated the Property for its potential to be used for District work or operations after the District discontinues use of the Property; and WHEREAS, District staff has determined that the Property is not suitable for the District’s use after the District discontinues use of the Property; and WHEREAS, the Fire Board has previously adopted Resolution FD2020-025, declaring that the Property is surplus land and not necessary for the District’s use; and WHEREAS, in December of 2021 the District sent written notices of availability of the Property to certain designated entities, but negotiations did not result in the sale of the Property; and WHEREAS, the Fire Board previously adopted Resolution FD2021-010, approving covenants and restrictions on real property pursuant to Government Code Section 54233 for this parcel, but was directed by the California Department of Housing and Community Development to replace this covenant with the language included in this resolution which is in accordance with Government Code Section 54233.5; NOW, THEREFORE, THE FIRE DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1.The above recitals are true and correct and are a substantive part of this Resolution. Section 2.Resolution FD2021-010 is hereby amended and replaced by this Resolution. Page 120 -2- 1 6 6 7 Section 3.The Fire District Board of Directors hereby approves the Covenants and Restrictions for Real Property, attached as Exhibit B. Section 4.The officers and staff of the District are hereby authorized, jointly and severally, to do all things which they may deem necessary or proper to effectuate the purposes of this Resolution, and any such actions previously taken are hereby ratified and confirmed. Such actions include negotiating in good faith in accordance with the requirements of the Act with any of the Designated Entities that submit a written notice of interest to purchase or lease the Property in compliance with the Act. Section 5.The Clerk of the Board shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. Page 121 -3- 1 6 6 7 Exhibit A Legal Description THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST ONE QUARTER OF SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 7 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, ACCORDING TO GOVERNMENT SURVEY, AS THE LINES OF SAID GOVERNMENT SURVEY MAY BE EXTENDED ACROSS THE CUCAMONGA RANCHO, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 3, 990 FEET WEST OF THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION, SAID POINT BEING THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THAT PARCEL OF LAND CONVEYED TO HENRY G. KLUSMAN BY DEED RECORDED JUNE 25, 1930, IN BOOK 635, PAGE(S) 117, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA; THENCE NORTH 322 FEET, MORE OR LESS, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE PROPERTY CONVEYED TO POINT THEREON THAT IS SOUTH 324 FEET 4 INCHES FROM THE NORTHEAST CORNER THEREOF, FOR THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. THENCE 11 EAST 110.64 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF PROPERTY SO CONVEYED TO KLUSMAN THAT IS SOUTH THEREON 328 FEET,5 INCHES FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE NORTH 328 FEET 5 INCHES ALONG SAID WEST LINE TO SAID NORTHWEST CORNER BEING A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAN BERNARDINO ROAD; THENCE EAST 110 FEET, MORE OR LESS, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SAN BERNARDINO ROAD, BEING THE NORTH LINE OF PROPERTY SO CONVEYED TO KLUSMAN,THE NORTHEAST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE SOUTH 324 FEET 4 INCHES ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID PROPERTY TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.   Page 122 -4- 1 6 6 7 EXHIBIT B RECORDING REQUESTED BY, AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: City of Rancho Cucamonga Attn: City Clerk 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 RE: APN 0208-151-07 Exempt from recording fees pursuant to Government Code Section 6103. (Space above for Recorder’s use.) COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR REAL PROPERTY (per Government Code Section 54233.5) These COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR REAL PROPERTY is executed as of September 15, 2021, by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District ("Owner"). RECITALS WHEREAS, Owner is the owner of certain real property located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, California as is described in the legal description in the attached and incorporated Exhibit A ("the Property"); WHEREAS, Assembly Bill 1486 amended the Surplus Land Act (Government Code Section 54220 et. seq.) and created new obligations before a local agency may dispose of surplus land; WHEREAS, the Surplus Land Act designates the California State Department of Housing and Community Development ("HCD") with oversight with respect to a local agency's compliance with the Surplus Land Act; and WHEREAS, HCD requires that certain affordability covenants and restrictions be recorded against surplus land as set forth in Government Code Section 54233.5 prior to its disposition. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, the Owner declares as follows: A. Where local zoning permits development of 10 or more residential units or is rezoned within five years of the disposal to permit the development of 10 or more residential units, and ten (10) or more residential units are developed on the property described on Exhibit "A" attached Page 123 -5- 1 6 6 7 hereto then not less than 15 percent of the total number of residential units developed on the property shall be sold or rented at an affordable housing cost, as defined in Section 50052.5 of the California Health and Safety Code, or affordable rent, as defined in Section 50053 of the California Health and Safety Code, to lower-income households, as defined in Section 50079.5 of the California Health and Safety Code. Rental units shall remain affordable to and occupied by lower- income households for a period of 55 years for rental housing and 45 years for ownership housing. The initial occupants of all ownership units shall be lower-income households, and the units shall be subject to an equity sharing agreement consistent with the provisions of paragraph (2) of subdivision (c) of 65915 of the California Government Code. B. These requirements shall be covenants and restrictions running with the land and shall be enforceable against any owner who violates a covenant or restriction and each successor-in- interest who continues the violation by any of the entities described in subdivisions (a) to (f), inclusive, of Section 54222.5 of the California Government Code. C. The Restrictions and Covenants set forth herein are intended not to merge into the Owner's fee simple title to the Property, but become effective when the Property is conveyed by the current Owner (i.e. Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District). IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this Covenants and Restrictions for Real Property to be signed by its duly authorized representatives, as of the day and year first above written. OWNER: RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT John Gillison, City Manager ATTEST: Page 124 ATTACHMENT 3 11231-0001\2481928v1.doc RESOLUTION NO. ______ A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA APPROVING COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS ON REAL PROPERTY PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54233.5 FOR THAT REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 9612 SAN BERNARDINO ROAD, AND AMENDING AND REPLACING RESOLUTION NO. FD 2021-011 WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (“District”) is the owner in fee simple of that certain real property described in Exhibit “A,” attached hereto and made a part of hereof (“Property”); and WHEREAS, the Property is vacant property located at 9612 San Bernardino Road, which the District is no longer expected to use or need as of July 31, 2021; and WHEREAS, District staff has evaluated the Property for its potential to be used for District work or operations after the District discontinues use of the Property; and WHEREAS, District staff has determined that the Property is not suitable for the District’s use after the District discontinues use of the Property; and WHEREAS, the Fire Board has previously adopted Resolution FD2020-024, declaring that the Property is surplus land and not necessary for the District’s use; and WHEREAS, in December of 2020 the District sent written notices of availability of the Property to certain designated entities, but negotiations did not result in the sale of the Property; WHEREAS, the Fire Board previously adopted Resolution FD2021-011, approving covenants and restrictions on real property pursuant to Government Code Section 54233 for this parcel, but was directed by the California Department of Housing and Community Development to replace this covenant with the language included in this resolution which is in accordance with Government Code Section 54233.5; NOW, THEREFORE, THE FIRE DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1.The above recitals are true and correct and are a substantive part of this Resolution. Section 2.Resolution FD2021-011 is hereby amended and replaced by this Resolution. Page 125 -2- 1 6 6 8 Section 3.The Fire District Board of Directors hereby approves the Covenants and Restrictions for Real Property, attached as Exhibit B. Section 4.The officers and staff of the District are hereby authorized, jointly and severally, to do all things which they may deem necessary or proper to effectuate the purposes of this Resolution, and any such actions previously taken are hereby ratified and confirmed. Such actions include negotiating in good faith in accordance with the requirements of the Act with any of the Designated Entities that submit a written notice of interest to purchase or lease the Property in compliance with the Act. Section 5.The Clerk of the Board shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. Page 126 -3- 1 6 6 8 Exhibit A Legal Description The Land referred to herein below is situated in the unincorporated area of the County of San Bernardino, State of California, and is described as follows: PARCEL "A" AS SHOWN ON CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE FOR LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 235, AS EVIDENCED BY DOCUMENT RECORDED SEPTEMBER 10, 1986 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 86-261471 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP, 1 SOUTH, RANGE 7 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS THE LINES OF THE GOVERNMENT SURVEY MAY BE EXTENDED ACROSS THE CUCAMONGA RANCHO, PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF OLD SAN BERNARDINO ROAD, SO-CALLED, (BEING THE ROAD DESCRIBED AS LEADING EASTERLY FROM THE SCHOOL HOUSE IN CUCAMONGA) 488 FEET WEST FROM THE WEST LINE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE; THENCE NORTH PARALLEL WITH THE WEST LINE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE 150 FEET; THENCE WEST PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH LINE OF OLD SAN BERNARDINO ROAD, 126.72 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE WEST LINE OF THE LAND CONVEYED TO JOHN D. MAC PHERSON AND WIFE, BY DEED DATED APRIL 5, 1945 AND RECORDED APRIL 21, 1945, IN BOOK 1763, PAGE 282 OFFICIAL RECORDS; THENCE SOUTH 0° 10’ WEST, 150 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID MAC PHERSON LAND; THENCE EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF OLD SAN BERNARDINO ROAD TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING THE WEST 30 FEET THEREOF FOR ROAD PURPOSES. For conveyancing purposes only: APN 0208-131-83 Page 127 -4- 1 6 6 8 EXHIBIT B RECORDING REQUESTED BY, AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: City of Rancho Cucamonga Attn: City Clerk 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 RE: APN 0208-131-83 Exempt from recording fees pursuant to Government Code Section 6103. (Space above for Recorder’s use.) COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR REAL PROPERTY (per Government Code Section 54233.5) These COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR REAL PROPERTY is executed as of September 15, 2021, by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District ("Owner"). RECITALS WHEREAS, Owner is the owner of certain real property located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, California as is described in the legal description in the attached and incorporated Exhibit A ("the Property"); WHEREAS, Assembly Bill 1486 amended the Surplus Land Act (Government Code Section 54220 et. seq.) and created new obligations before a local agency may dispose of surplus land; WHEREAS, the Surplus Land Act designates the California State Department of Housing and Community Development ("HCD") with oversight with respect to a local agency's compliance with the Surplus Land Act; and WHEREAS, HCD requires that certain affordability covenants and restrictions be recorded against surplus land as set forth in Government Code Section 54233.5 prior to its disposition. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, the Owner declares as follows: A. Where local zoning permits development of 10 or more residential units or is rezoned within five years of the disposal to permit the development of 10 or more residential units, and ten (10) or more residential units are developed on the property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto then not less than 15 percent of the total number of residential units developed on the property shall be sold or rented at an affordable housing cost, as defined in Section 50052.5 of the Page 128 -5- 1 6 6 8 California Health and Safety Code, or affordable rent, as defined in Section 50053 of the California Health and Safety Code, to lower-income households, as defined in Section 50079.5 of the California Health and Safety Code. Rental units shall remain affordable to and occupied by lower- income households for a period of 55 years for rental housing and 45 years for ownership housing. The initial occupants of all ownership units shall be lower-income households, and the units shall be subject to an equity sharing agreement consistent with the provisions of paragraph (2) of subdivision (c) of 65915 of the California Government Code. B. These requirements shall be covenants and restrictions running with the land and shall be enforceable against any owner who violates a covenant or restriction and each successor-in- interest who continues the violation by any of the entities described in subdivisions (a) to (f), inclusive, of Section 54222.5 of the California Government Code. C. The Restrictions and Covenants set forth herein are intended not to merge into the Owner's fee simple title to the Property, but become effective when the Property is conveyed by the current Owner (i.e. Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District). IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this Covenants and Restrictions for Real Property to be signed by its duly authorized representatives, as of the day and year first above written. OWNER: RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT John Gillison, City Manager ATTEST: Page 129 DATE:September 15, 2021 TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY:Robert Neiuber, Human Resources Director Lucy Alvarez-Nunez, Management Analyst I SUBJECT:Consideration to Adopt a Resolution Approving Side Letter Agreements between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and City Bargaining Units, Including a Part-Time City Employee Benefit. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021- 104) (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving side letter agreements between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and City bargaining units including a part- time City employee benefit. BACKGROUND: According to the CDC, COVID-19 vaccines are safe and effective at preventing COVID-19 including severe illness and death. In addition, COVID-19 vaccines are effective against severe disease and death from variants of the virus that cause COVID-19. Currently these variants, including the Delta variant, are circulating in the United States. Infections happen in only a small proportion of people who are fully vaccinated, even with the Delta variant, and when these infections occur among vaccinated people, they tend to be mild. Under federal law, an employer may offer an incentive to employees to voluntarily provide documentation or other confirmation of a COVID-19 vaccination. Under Cal/OSHA regulations, employees that are fully vaccinated can continue to work if exposed to COVID-19 as long as they have no symptoms, and under CDC guidelines people who travel out of the country or state do not need to quarantine for seven to ten days after travel. Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, services to the public have been adversely impacted when staff is out ill with COVID and/or required to quarantine away from the workplace as a result of exposure. ANALYSIS: Fully vaccinated employees help the City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) maintain staffing levels and provide continuity of public services to the community. In order to maintain a safe and healthy workplace, the City wants to encourage employees to be fully vaccinated for COVID-19 to contain and mitigate the spread of COVID-19 within the workplace and the community. For those reasons, the City is desirous of implementing a COVID- 19 Vaccine Incentive Program for all City employees. The full program and requirements are Page 130 Page 2 9 6 1 outlined in the attached side letter agreements and part-time City employee benefit update. In summary, this program would be effective immediately and would be in place until November 30, 2021. Any current employee who is fully vaccinated (as defined by the side letter) and has provided proof of being fully vaccinated would be eligible for the following incentive: Full-Time Employees - Eligible full-time employees would receive 2 days of floating holiday time that must be used prior to June 30, 2022, in accordance with their existing MOU’s. Part-Time Employees - Eligible part-time employees would receive 10 hours of floating holiday time which they can use on November 25, 2021 or December 25, 2021. The City also negotiated updated MOU provisions with the Executive Management Group related to constructive receipt. This negotiated provision updates the process for vacation buyback. There is no additional benefit provided. Staff recommends the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the side letter agreements and part-time City employee benefit. FISCAL IMPACT: The City could incur a cost of up to $20,000 associated with the program for fiscal year 2021/22 for part-time employees. The City would adjust the departmental budgets to reflect this change at mid-year. There is no direct dollar cost for the additional time off for full-time employees. COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: This item addresses the Council’s core values of promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community for all and working together cooperatively and respectfully with each other, staff, and all stakeholders. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 – Resolution No. 2021-104 Attachment 2 – Executive Management Group Side Letter Agreement Attachment 3 – Rancho Cucamonga Management Association Side Letter Agreement Attachment 4 – Rancho Cucamonga City Employees Association Side Letter Agreement Attachment 5 – Teamsters Local 1932 Side Letter Agreement Attachment 6 – Part Time City Employee Benefit Update Page 131 ATTACHMENT 1 1 6 8 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2021-XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SIDE LETTER AGREEMENTS BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND CITY BARGAINING UNITS, INCLUDING A PART TIME CITY EMPLOYEE BENEFIT. WHEREAS, representatives of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) and representatives of all City Bargaining Units have met and conferred pursuant to the provisions of the Meyers- Milias-Brown Act (California Government Code §3500, et seq.) with regard to terms and conditions of employment; and WHEREAS, representatives of the City and representatives of all City Bargaining Units have agreed upon and presented to this City Council a Side Letter Agreement (see attached Side Letter Agreements) and a Part Time City Employee Benefit Update, effective September 15, 2021 until November 30, 2021; and NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES that said Side Letter Agreements with all City Bargaining Units and Part Time City Employees Benefit Update are hereby approved and the City Manager is hereby authorized to sign said Side Letter Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. PASSED, APROVED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of September 2021. Page 132 ATTACHMENT 2 SIDE LETTER OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEE GROUP The City of Rancho Cucamonga ("City") and the Executive Management Employee Group (collectively, the "Parties") entered into a Memorandum of Understanding ("MOU") that commenced on July 1, 2019, and expires on June 30, 2022. The Parties met and conferred in good faith in August and September of 2021. The Parties agreed to a temporary COVID-19 vaccine incentive program and an updated MOU process related to the cash-out of vacation time. COVID-19 Vaccine Incentive Program In order to maintain a safe and healthy workplace, the City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) wants to encourage employees to be “fully vaccinated” for COVID-19 in order to contain and mitigate the spread of COVID-19 within the workplace and the community. For those reasons, the City is desirous of implementing a COVID-19 Vaccine Incentive Program for all City employees. This program would be in place until November 30, 2021. Any current employee who is “fully vaccinated” and has provided “proof” would be eligible for the following incentives. Incentives: Full-Time Employees: Eligible full-time employees would receive 2 days of floating holiday time that must be used prior to June 30, 2022, in accordance with their existing MOU’s. These days may be taken by an employee at his or her convenience, subject to approval of the supervisor. The City recognizes that employees with qualifying disabilities under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and employees with sincerely held religious beliefs under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII) may request medical or religious accommodations in order to be considered eligible for this program. Qualifying employees are entitled to a reasonable accommodation process. The City has found that a reasonable accommodation for those that qualify for an accommodation is a weekly “COVID-19 test” at an “approved testing location” during working hours during the eligibility period of the program (adoption to November 30, 2021). This provides an alternate way to maintain a safe and healthy workplace. Employees requesting any statutory exemption from the eligibility requirements of this program may be required to provide supporting documentation, certification, or other evidence or information permissible by law. Requests for accommodation must be made within fourteen (14) calendar days of adoption of this policy. Each request will be considered under the applicable statutes, including the ADA and Title VII, but employees should understand that the City is not legally required to, provide accommodations to all employees who make such a request. Page 133 ATTACHMENT 2 Definitions: “fully vaccinated” The employer has documented that the person received, at least 14 days prior, either the second dose in a two-dose COVID-19 vaccine series or a single dose COVID- 19 vaccine. Vaccines must be FDA approved; or have an emergency use authorization from the FDA. “Proof” means valid documentation of the person’s COVID-19 vaccination record, which may be their vaccine card or a copy or a digital version thereof, as provided by their health care provider, the State Department of Public Health or another state or federal agency has been shared with the City HR Department. HR will review the proof but keep no copies. A confidential spreadsheet of those that are fully vaccinated will be maintained by the City “COVID-19 test” means a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test for SARS-CoV-2 that is both: (1) Approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) or has an Emergency Use Authorization from the FDA to diagnose current infection with the SARS-CoV-2 virus; and (2) Administered in accordance with the FDA approval or the FDA Emergency Use Authorization as applicable. Acceptable documentation of a COVID-19 test would be an electronic copy of the results as provided to the employee from an approved testing site. HR will review the documentation but keep no copies. A confidential spreadsheet of the weekly testing results will be maintained by the City. “approved testing locations” means any San Bernardino County run COVID-19 testing location or any testing location provided by an employee’s City offered Health Plan Care Provider. Employees must coordinate with their supervisor on testing times. The forms for requesting a medical or religious exemption are available from Human Resources. If an accommodation request is denied, employees will have seven calendar days to request in writing (email is acceptable) a reconsideration from the Deputy City Manager, Lori Sassoon (lori.sassoon@cityofrc.us). The Deputy City Manager’s determination is final. VACATION BUYBACK SECTION 14 Annually, at the employee's written request, the City will "buy back," the total cash value of up to 200 hours of previously earned vacation leave. This buy back shall occur twice annually, in April and November. Employees must maintain a minimum of 40 hours of accrued vacation subsequent to any payment of vacation buy back time. Employees who wish to sell back vacation must request payment of not less than 20 hours and not more than 200 hours in a calendar year. Beginning December 2021 and annually thereafter, any employee that wants to have the City buy back vacation hours shall make an irrevocable election to do so. The irrevocable election shall be submitted in writing to the City's Human Resources Department on or before December 15 and shall indicate the number of hours of vacation that the employee expects to earn in the following calendar year that the employee wants the City to buy back, with a minimum buy back of 20 hours up to a maximum of 200 hours. This buy back shall occur twice annually, in June/July (between Page 134 ATTACHMENT 2 the last payday in June and the first payday in July) and December (between the first and second payday of the month), and the employee must indicate the total amount of hours they want paid out in June/July and in December. Regardless of the number of hours requested to be cashed out at either time, the most the City can cash out is the number of hours accrued and available in that calendar year to date. Employees must maintain a minimum of 40 hours of accrued vacation subsequent to any payment of vacation buyback time. This Side Letter of Agreement shall be incorporated into the MOU. The MOU shall remain in full force and effect except to the extent modified by this Side Letter of Agreement. This Side Letter of Agreement shall not be effective until ratified by the City Council and the Executive Management Group. For the City of Rancho Cucamonga For the Executive Management Group ___________________________________ ___________________________________ John Gillison Jennifer Hunt-Gracia City Manager Executive Management Group Representative ___________________________________ Anne McIntosh Executive Management Group Representative Page 135 1 SIDE LETTER OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION The City of Rancho Cucamonga ("City") and the Rancho Cucamonga Management Association (collectively, the "Parties") entered into a Memorandum of Understanding ("MOU") that commenced on June 2, 2021, and expires on June 30, 2022. The Parties met and conferred in good faith in August and September of 2021. The Parties agreed to a temporary COVID-19 vaccine incentive program. COVID-19 Vaccine Incentive Program In order to maintain a safe and healthy workplace, the City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) wants to encourage employees to be “fully vaccinated” for COVID-19 in order to contain and mitigate the spread of COVID-19 within the workplace and the community. For those reasons, the City is desirous of implementing a COVID-19 Vaccine Incentive Program for all City employees. This program would be in place until November 30, 2021. Any current employee who is “fully vaccinated” and has provided “proof” would be eligible for the following incentives. Incentives: Full-Time Employees: Eligible full-time employees would receive 2 days of floating holiday time that must be used prior to June 30, 2022, in accordance with their existing MOU’s. These days may be taken by an employee at his or her convenience, subject to approval of the supervisor. The City recognizes that employees with qualifying disabilities under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and employees with sincerely held religious beliefs under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII) may request medical or religious accommodations in order to be considered eligible for this program. Qualifying employees are entitled to a reasonable accommodation process. The City has found that a reasonable accommodation for those that qualify for an accommodation is a weekly “COVID-19 test” at an “approved testing location” during working hours during the eligibility period of the program (adoption to November 30, 2021). This provides an alternate way to maintain a safe and healthy workplace. Employees requesting any statutory exemption from the eligibility requirements of this program may be required to provide supporting documentation, certification, or other evidence or information permissible by law. Requests for accommodation must be made within fourteen (14) calendar days of adoption of this policy. Each request will be considered under the applicable statutes, including the ADA and Title VII, but employees should understand that the City is not legally required to, provide accommodations to all employees who make such a request. ATTACHMENT 3 Page 136 2 Definitions: “fully vaccinated” The employer has documented that the person received, at least 14 days prior, either the second dose in a two-dose COVID-19 vaccine series or a single dose COVID- 19 vaccine. Vaccines must be FDA approved; or have an emergency use authorization from the FDA. “Proof” means valid documentation of the person’s COVID-19 vaccination record, which may be their vaccine card or a copy or a digital version thereof, as provided by their health care provider, the State Department of Public Health or another state or federal agency has been shared with the City HR Department. HR will review the proof but keep no copies. A confidential spreadsheet of those that are fully vaccinated will be maintained by the City “COVID-19 test” means a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test for SARS-CoV-2 that is both: (1) Approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) or has an Emergency Use Authorization from the FDA to diagnose current infection with the SARS-CoV-2 virus; and (2) Administered in accordance with the FDA approval or the FDA Emergency Use Authorization as applicable. Acceptable documentation of a COVID-19 test would be an electronic copy of the results as provided to the employee from an approved testing site. HR will review the documentation but keep no copies. A confidential spreadsheet of the weekly testing results will be maintained by the City. “approved testing locations” means any San Bernardino County run COVID-19 testing location or any testing location provided by an employee’s City offered Health Plan Care Provider. Employees must coordinate with their supervisor on testing times. The forms for requesting a medical or religious exemption are available from Human Resources. If an accommodation request is denied, employees will have seven calendar days to request in writing (email is acceptable) a reconsideration from the Deputy City Manager, Lori Sassoon (lori.sassoon@cityofrc.us). The Deputy City Manager’s determination is final. This Side Letter of Agreement shall be incorporated into the MOU. The MOU shall remain in full force and effect except to the extent modified by this Side Letter of Agreement. This Side Letter of Agreement shall not be effective until ratified by the City Council and approved by the Rancho Cucamonga Management Association. For the City of Rancho Cucamonga For the Rancho Cucamonga Management Association ___________________________________ ________________________________________ John Gillison Katie Distelrath President City Manager Rancho Cucamonga Management Association Page 137 1 SIDE LETTER OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION The City of Rancho Cucamonga ("City") and the Rancho Cucamonga City Employees Association (collectively, the "Parties") entered into a Memorandum of Understanding ("MOU") that commenced on June 7, 2021, and expires on June 30, 2022. The Parties met and conferred in good faith in August and September of 2021. The Parties agreed to a temporary COVID-19 vaccine incentive program. COVID-19 Vaccine Incentive Program In order to maintain a safe and healthy workplace, the City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) wants to encourage employees to be “fully vaccinated” for COVID-19 in order to contain and mitigate the spread of COVID-19 within the workplace and the community. For those reasons, the City is desirous of implementing a COVID-19 Vaccine Incentive Program for all City employees. This program would be in place until November 30, 2021. Any current employee who is “fully vaccinated” and has provided “proof” would be eligible for the following incentives. Incentives: Full-Time Employees: Eligible full-time employees would receive 2 days of floating holiday time that must be used prior to June 30, 2022, in accordance with their existing MOU’s. These days may be taken by an employee at his or her convenience, subject to approval of the supervisor. The City recognizes that employees with qualifying disabilities under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and employees with sincerely held religious beliefs under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII) may request medical or religious accommodations in order to be considered eligible for this program. Qualifying employees are entitled to a reasonable accommodation process. The City has found that a reasonable accommodation for those that qualify for an accommodation is a weekly “COVID-19 test” at an “approved testing location” during working hours during the eligibility period of the program (adoption to November 30, 2021). This provides an alternate way to maintain a safe and healthy workplace. Employees requesting any statutory exemption from the eligibility requirements of this program may be required to provide supporting documentation, certification, or other evidence or information permissible by law. Requests for accommodation must be made within fourteen (14) calendar days of adoption of this policy. Each request will be considered under the applicable statutes, including the ADA and Title VII, but employees should understand that the City is not legally required to, provide accommodations to all employees who make such a request. ATTACHMENT 4 Page 138 2 Definitions: “fully vaccinated” The employer has documented that the person received, at least 14 days prior, either the second dose in a two-dose COVID-19 vaccine series or a single dose COVID- 19 vaccine. Vaccines must be FDA approved; or have an emergency use authorization from the FDA. “Proof” means valid documentation of the person’s COVID-19 vaccination record, which may be their vaccine card or a copy or a digital version thereof, as provided by their health care provider, the State Department of Public Health or another state or federal agency has been shared with the City HR Department. HR will review the proof but keep no copies. A confidential spreadsheet of those that are fully vaccinated will be maintained by the City “COVID-19 test” means a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test for SARS-CoV-2 that is both: (1) Approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) or has an Emergency Use Authorization from the FDA to diagnose current infection with the SARS-CoV-2 virus; and (2) Administered in accordance with the FDA approval or the FDA Emergency Use Authorization as applicable. Acceptable documentation of a COVID-19 test would be an electronic copy of the results as provided to the employee from an approved testing site. HR will review the documentation but keep no copies. A confidential spreadsheet of the weekly testing results will be maintained by the City. “approved testing locations” means any San Bernardino County run COVID-19 testing location or any testing location provided by an employee’s City offered Health Plan Care Provider. Employees must coordinate with their supervisor on testing times. The forms for requesting a medical or religious exemption are available from Human Resources. If an accommodation request is denied, employees will have seven calendar days to request in writing (email is acceptable) a reconsideration from the Deputy City Manager, Lori Sassoon (lori.sassoon@cityofrc.us). The Deputy City Manager’s determination is final. This Side Letter of Agreement shall be incorporated into the MOU. The MOU shall remain in full force and effect except to the extent modified by this Side Letter of Agreement. This Side Letter of Agreement shall not be effective until ratified by the City Council and approved by the Rancho Cucamonga City Employees Association. For the City of Rancho Cucamonga For the Rancho Cucamonga City Employees Association ___________________________________ ________________________________________ John Gillison Andy Miller President City Manager Rancho Cucamonga City Employees Association Page 139 1 SIDE LETTER OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE TEAMSTERS LOCAL 1932 The City of Rancho Cucamonga ("City") and the Teamsters Local 1932(collectively, the "Parties") entered into a Memorandum of Understanding ("MOU") that commenced on July 1, 2019 and expires on June 30, 2022. The Parties met and conferred in good faith in August and September of 2021. The Parties agreed to a temporary COVID-19 vaccine incentive program. COVID-19 Vaccine Incentive Program In order to maintain a safe and healthy workplace, the City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) wants to encourage employees to be “fully vaccinated” for COVID-19 in order to contain and mitigate the spread of COVID-19 within the workplace and the community. For those reasons, the City is desirous of implementing a COVID-19 Vaccine Incentive Program for all City employees. This program would be in place until November 30, 2021. Any current employee who is “fully vaccinated” and has provided “proof” would be eligible for the following incentives. Incentives: Full-Time Employees: Eligible full-time employees would receive 2 days of floating holiday time that must be used prior to June 30, 2022, in accordance with their existing MOU’s. These days may be taken by an employee at his or her convenience, subject to approval of the supervisor. The City recognizes that employees with qualifying disabilities under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and employees with sincerely held religious beliefs under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII) may request medical or religious accommodations in order to be considered eligible for this program. Qualifying employees are entitled to a reasonable accommodation process. The City has found that a reasonable accommodation for those that qualify for an accommodation is a weekly “COVID-19 test” at an “approved testing location” during working hours during the eligibility period of the program (adoption to November 30, 2021). This provides an alternate way to maintain a safe and healthy workplace. Employees requesting any statutory exemption from the eligibility requirements of this program may be required to provide supporting documentation, certification, or other evidence or information permissible by law. Requests for accommodation must be made within fourteen (14) calendar days of adoption of this policy. Each request will be considered under the applicable statutes, including the ADA and Title VII, but employees should understand that the City is not legally required to, provide accommodations to all employees who make such a request. ATTACHMENT 5 Page 140 2 Definitions: “fully vaccinated” The employer has documented that the person received, at least 14 days prior, either the second dose in a two-dose COVID-19 vaccine series or a single dose COVID- 19 vaccine. Vaccines must be FDA approved; or have an emergency use authorization from the FDA. “Proof” means valid documentation of the person’s COVID-19 vaccination record, which may be their vaccine card or a copy or a digital version thereof, as provided by their health care provider, the State Department of Public Health or another state or federal agency has been shared with the City HR Department. HR will review the proof but keep no copies. A confidential spreadsheet of those that are fully vaccinated will be maintained by the City “COVID-19 test” means a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test for SARS-CoV-2 that is both: (1) Approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) or has an Emergency Use Authorization from the FDA to diagnose current infection with the SARS-CoV-2 virus; and (2) Administered in accordance with the FDA approval or the FDA Emergency Use Authorization as applicable. Acceptable documentation of a COVID-19 test would be an electronic copy of the results as provided to the employee from an approved testing site. HR will review the documentation but keep no copies. A confidential spreadsheet of the weekly testing results will be maintained by the City. “approved testing locations” means any San Bernardino County run COVID-19 testing location or any testing location provided by an employee’s City offered Health Plan Care Provider. Employees must coordinate with their supervisor on testing times. The forms for requesting a medical or religious exemption are available from Human Resources. If an accommodation request is denied, employees will have seven calendar days to request in writing (email is acceptable) a reconsideration from the Deputy City Manager, Lori Sassoon (lori.sassoon@cityofrc.us). The Deputy City Manager’s determination is final. This Side Letter of Agreement shall be incorporated into the MOU. The MOU shall remain in full force and effect except to the extent modified by this Side Letter of Agreement. This Side Letter of Agreement shall not be effective until ratified by the City Council and approved by the Teamsters Local 1932. For the City of Rancho Cucamonga For the Teamsters Local 1932 ___________________________________ ________________________________________ John Gillison Caleb Dupont President City Manager Teamsters Local 1932 Page 141 1 NEW PART-TIME EMPLOYEE BENEFIT The City of Rancho Cucamonga is providing a temporary COVID-19 vaccine incentive program for part-time employees. COVID-19 Vaccine Incentive Program In order to maintain a safe and healthy workplace, the City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) wants to encourage employees to be “fully vaccinated” for COVID-19 in order to contain and mitigate the spread of COVID-19 within the workplace and the community. For those reasons, the City is desirous of implementing a COVID-19 Vaccine Incentive Program for all City employees. This program would be in place until November 30, 2021. Any current employee who is “fully vaccinated” and has provided “proof” would be eligible for the following incentives. Incentive: Part-Time Employees Eligible part time employees would receive 10 hours of floating holiday time which they can use on November 25, 2021 or December 25, 2021. Departments would work with their part-time employees and add 10 hours of floating holiday time onto their timecards for one of those two dates. The City recognizes that employees with qualifying disabilities under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and employees with sincerely held religious beliefs under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII) may request medical or religious accommodations in order to be considered eligible for this program. Qualifying employees are entitled to a reasonable accommodation process. The City has found that a reasonable accommodation for those that qualify for an accommodation is a weekly “COVID-19 test” at an “approved testing location” during working hours during the eligibility period of the program (adoption to November 30, 2021). This provides an alternate way to maintain a safe and healthy workplace. Employees requesting any statutory exemption from the eligibility requirements of this program may be required to provide supporting documentation, certification, or other evidence or information permissible by law. Requests for accommodation must be made within fourteen (14) calendar days of adoption of this policy. Each request will be considered under the applicable statutes, including the ADA and Title VII, but employees should understand that the City is not legally required to, provide accommodations to all employees who make such a request. Definitions: “fully vaccinated” The employer has documented that the person received, at least 14 days prior, either the second dose in a two-dose COVID-19 vaccine series or a single dose COVID- 19 vaccine. Vaccines must be FDA approved; or have an emergency use authorization from the FDA. ATTACHMENT 6 Page 142 2 “Proof” means valid documentation of the person’s COVID-19 vaccination record, which may be their vaccine card or a copy or a digital version thereof, as provided by their health care provider, the State Department of Public Health or another state or federal agency has been shared with the City HR Department. HR will review the proof but keep no copies. A confidential spreadsheet of those that are fully vaccinated will be maintained by the City “COVID-19 test” means a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test for SARS-CoV-2 that is both: (1) Approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) or has an Emergency Use Authorization from the FDA to diagnose current infection with the SARS-CoV-2 virus; and (2) Administered in accordance with the FDA approval or the FDA Emergency Use Authorization as applicable. Acceptable documentation of a COVID-19 test would be an electronic copy of the results as provided to the employee from an approved testing site. HR will review the documentation but keep no copies. A confidential spreadsheet of the weekly testing results will be maintained by the City. “approved testing locations” means any San Bernardino County run COVID-19 testing location or any testing location provided by an employee’s City offered Health Plan Care Provider. Employees must coordinate with their supervisor on testing times. The forms for requesting a medical or religious exemption are available from Human Resources. If an accommodation request is denied, employees will have seven calendar days to request in writing (email is acceptable) a reconsideration from the Deputy City Manager, Lori Sassoon (lori.sassoon@cityofrc.us). The Deputy City Manager’s determination is final. Page 143 DATE:September 15, 2021 TO:President and Members of the Board of Directors FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY:Robert Neiuber, Human Resources Director Lucy Alvarez-Nunez, Management Analyst I SUBJECT:Consideration to Adopt a Resolution Approving a Side Letter Agreement Between the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and Fire District Bargaining Units, Including a Part-Time Employee Benefit Update. (RESOLUTION NO. FD 2021-028). (FIRE) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Fire Board adopt a resolution approving a side letter agreement between the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and Fire District Bargaining Units, including a part-time employee benefit update. BACKGROUND: According to the CDC, COVID-19 vaccines are safe and effective at preventing COVID-19 including severe illness and death. In addition, COVID-19 vaccines are effective against severe disease and death from variants of the virus that cause COVID-19. Currently these variants, including the Delta variant, are circulating in the United States. Infections happen in only a small proportion of people who are fully vaccinated, even with the Delta variant, and when these infections occur among vaccinated people, they tend to be mild. Under federal law, an employer may offer an incentive to employees to voluntarily provide documentation or other confirmation of a COVID-19 vaccination. Under Cal/OSHA regulations, employees that are fully vaccinated can continue to work if exposed to COVID-19 as long as they have no symptoms, and under CDC guidelines people who travel out of the country or state do not need to quarantine for seven to ten days after travel. Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, services to the public have been adversely impacted when staff is out ill with COVID and/or required to quarantine away from the workplace as a result of exposure. ANALYSIS: Fully vaccinated employees help the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (District) maintain staffing levels and provide continuity of public services to the community. In order to maintain a safe and healthy workplace, the District wants to encourage employees to be fully vaccinated for COVID-19 to contain and mitigate the spread of COVID-19 within the workplace and the community. For those reasons, the District is desirous of implementing a COVID-19 Vaccine Incentive Program for all District employees. The full program and requirements are outlined in the attached side letter agreements and part-time employee benefit update. Page 144 Page 2 9 6 2 In summary, this program would be effective immediately and would be in place until November 30, 2021. Any current employee who is fully vaccinated (as defined by the side letter) and has provided proof of being fully vaccinated would be eligible for the following incentive: Full-Time Employees - Eligible full-time shift personnel would receive 24 hours of floating holiday time and eligible full-time 40-hour personnel would receive 20 hours of floating holiday time that must be used prior to June 30, 2022, in accordance with their existing MOU’s. Part-Time Employees - Eligible part time employees would receive 10 hours of floating holiday time which they can use on November 25, 2021 or December 25, 2021. Staff recommends the Fire Board adopt the attached resolution approving the side letter agreements and a part-time employee benefit update. FISCAL IMPACT: For fiscal year 2021/22, the District could incur a cost associated with the vaccine incentive program of up to $123,000 for full-time employees and $1,100 for part-time employees. The District would adjust its budget to reflect this change at mid-year. COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: This item addresses the Council’s core values of promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community for all and working together cooperatively and respectfully with each other, staff, and all stakeholders. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 – Resolution No. FD 2021-028 Attachment 2 – Fire Management Employee Group Side Letter Agreement Attachment 3 – Fire Union Side Letter Agreement Attachment 4 – Fire Support Services Association Side Letter Agreement Attachment 5 – Part Time Employee Benefit Update Page 145 ATTACHMENT 1 1 6 9 0 RESOLUTION NO. 2021-XXX RESOLUTION OF THE FIRE BOARD OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT APPROVING SIDE LETTER AGREEMENTS BETWEEN THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PROTECTION DISTRICT AND FIRE DISTRICT BARGAINING UNITS, INCLUDING A PART-TIME EMPLOYEE BENEFIT UPDATE. WHEREAS, representatives of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (District) and Fire District’s Bargaining Unit representatives have met and conferred pursuant to the provisions of the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act (California Government Code §3500, et seq.) with regard to terms and conditions of employment; and WHEREAS, representatives of the District and Fire District’s Bargaining Unit representatives have agreed upon and presented to this Fire Board a Side Letter Agreement (see attached Side Letter Agreements) and a Part-Time Employee Benefit Update, effective September 15, 2021 until November 30, 2021; and NOW, THEREFORE, THE FIRE BOARD OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT HEREBY RESOLVES that said Side Letter Agreements with all Fire District’s Bargaining Units and Part-Time Employee Benefit Update are hereby approved and the City Manager is hereby authorized to sign said Side Letter Agreements on behalf of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. PASSED, APROVED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of September 2021. Page 146 ATTACHMENT 2 SIDE LETTER OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE FIRE MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES GROUP The Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District ("District") and the Fire Management Employees Group (collectively, the "Parties") entered into a Memorandum of Understanding ("MOU") that commenced on July 1, 2019 and expires on June 30, 2023. The Parties met and conferred in good faith in August and September of 2021. The Parties agreed to a temporary COVID-19 vaccine incentive program. COVID-19 Vaccine Incentive Program In order to maintain a safe and healthy workplace, the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (District) wants to encourage employees to be “fully vaccinated” for COVID-19 in order to contain and mitigate the spread of COVID-19 within the workplace and the community. For those reasons, the District is desirous of implementing a COVID-19 Vaccine Incentive Program for all District employees. This program would be in place until November 30, 2021. Any current employee who is “fully vaccinated” and has provided “proof” would be eligible for the following incentives. Incentive: Full-Time Employees: Eligible full-time shift personnel would receive 24 hours of floating holiday time and eligible full-time 40-hour personnel would receive 20 hours of floating holiday time that must be used prior to June 30, 2022, in accordance with their existing MOU’s. These days may be taken by an employee at his or her convenience, subject to approval of the supervisor. The District recognizes that employees with qualifying disabilities under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and employees with sincerely held religious beliefs under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII) may request medical or religious accommodations in order to be considered eligible for this program. Qualifying employees are entitled to a reasonable accommodation process. The District has found that a reasonable accommodation for those that qualify for an accommodation is a weekly “COVID-19 test” at an “approved testing location” during working hours during the eligibility period of the program (adoption to November 30, 2021). This provides an alternate way to maintain a safe and healthy workplace. Employees requesting any statutory exemption from the eligibility requirements of this program may be required to provide supporting documentation, certification, or other evidence or information permissible by law. Requests for accommodation must be made within fourteen (14) calendar days of adoption of this policy. Each request will be considered under the applicable statutes, including the ADA and Title VII, but employees should understand that the District is not legally required to, provide accommodations to all employees who make such a request. Definitions: “fully vaccinated” The employer has documented that the person received, at least 14 days prior, either the second dose in a two-dose COVID-19 vaccine series or a single dose COVID- Page 147 ATTACHMENT 2 19 vaccine. Vaccines must be FDA approved; or have an emergency use authorization from the FDA. “Proof” means valid documentation of the person’s COVID-19 vaccination record, which may be their vaccine card or a copy or a digital version thereof, as provided by their health care provider, the State Department of Public Health or another state or federal agency has been shared with the City HR Department. HR will review the proof but keep no copies. A confidential spreadsheet of those that are fully vaccinated will be maintained by the City “COVID-19 test” means a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test for SARS-CoV-2 that is both: (1) Approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) or has an Emergency Use Authorization from the FDA to diagnose current infection with the SARS-CoV-2 virus; and (2) Administered in accordance with the FDA approval or the FDA Emergency Use Authorization as applicable. Acceptable documentation of a COVID-19 test would be an electronic copy of the results as provided to the employee from an approved testing site. HR will review the documentation but keep no copies. A confidential spreadsheet of the weekly testing results will be maintained by the City. “approved testing locations” means the District’s approved COVID-19 tester, any San Bernardino County run COVID-19 testing location, or any testing location provided by an employee’s District offered Health Plan Care Provider. Employees must coordinate with their supervisor on testing times. The forms for requesting a medical or religious exemption are available from Human Resources. If an accommodation request is denied, employees will have seven calendar days to request in writing (email is acceptable) a reconsideration from the Deputy City Manager, Lori Sassoon (lori.sassoon@cityofrc.us). The Deputy City Manager’s determination is final. This Side Letter of Agreement shall be incorporated into the MOU. The MOU shall remain in full force and effect except to the extent modified by this Side Letter of Agreement. This Side Letter of Agreement shall not be effective until ratified by the District Board and approved by the Fire Management Employees Group. For the Fire Protection District For the Fire Management Employees Group ___________________________________ ___________________________________ John Gillison Mike McCliman, President City Manager Fire Management Employees Group Page 148 ATTACHMENT 3 SIDE LETTER OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE FIRE UNION LOCAL 2274 The Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District ("District") and the Fire Union Local 2274 (collectively, the "Parties") entered into a Memorandum of Understanding ("MOU") that commenced on July 1, 2019 and expires on June 30, 2023. The Parties met and conferred in good faith in August and September of 2021. The Parties agreed to a temporary COVID-19 vaccine incentive program. COVID-19 Vaccine Incentive Program In order to maintain a safe and healthy workplace, the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (District) wants to encourage employees to be “fully vaccinated” for COVID-19 in order to contain and mitigate the spread of COVID-19 within the workplace and the community. For those reasons, the District is desirous of implementing a COVID-19 Vaccine Incentive Program for all District employees. This program would be in place until November 30, 2021. Any current employee who is “fully vaccinated” and has provided “proof” would be eligible for the following incentives. Incentive: Full-Time Employees: Eligible full-time shift personnel would receive 24 hours of floating holiday time and eligible full-time 40-hour personnel would receive 20 hours of floating holiday time that must be used prior to June 30, 2022, in accordance with their existing MOU’s. These days may be taken by an employee at his or her convenience, subject to approval of the supervisor. The District recognizes that employees with qualifying disabilities under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and employees with sincerely held religious beliefs under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII) may request medical or religious accommodations in order to be considered eligible for this program. Qualifying employees are entitled to a reasonable accommodation process. The District has found that a reasonable accommodation for those that qualify for an accommodation is a weekly “COVID-19 test” at an “approved testing location” during working hours during the eligibility period of the program (adoption to November 30, 2021). This provides an alternate way to maintain a safe and healthy workplace. Employees requesting any statutory exemption from the eligibility requirements of this program may be required to provide supporting documentation, certification, or other evidence or information permissible by law. Requests for accommodation must be made within fourteen (14) calendar days of adoption of this policy. Each request will be considered under the applicable statutes, including the ADA and Title VII, but employees should understand that the District is not legally required to, provide accommodations to all employees who make such a request. Definitions: Page 149 ATTACHMENT 3 “fully vaccinated” The employer has documented that the person received, at least 14 days prior, either the second dose in a two-dose COVID-19 vaccine series or a single dose COVID- 19 vaccine. Vaccines must be FDA approved; or have an emergency use authorization from the FDA. “Proof” means valid documentation of the person’s COVID-19 vaccination record, which may be their vaccine card or a copy or a digital version thereof, as provided by their health care provider, the State Department of Public Health or another state or federal agency has been shared with the City HR Department. HR will review the proof but keep no copies. A confidential spreadsheet of those that are fully vaccinated will be maintained by the City “COVID-19 test” means a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test for SARS-CoV-2 that is both: (1) Approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) or has an Emergency Use Authorization from the FDA to diagnose current infection with the SARS-CoV-2 virus; and (2) Administered in accordance with the FDA approval or the FDA Emergency Use Authorization as applicable. Acceptable documentation of a COVID-19 test would be an electronic copy of the results as provided to the employee from an approved testing site. HR will review the documentation but keep no copies. A confidential spreadsheet of the weekly testing results will be maintained by the City. “approved testing locations” means the District’s approved COVID-19 tester, any San Bernardino County run COVID-19 testing location, or any testing location provided by an employee’s District offered Health Plan Care Provider. Employees must coordinate with their supervisor on testing times. The forms for requesting a medical or religious exemption are available from Human Resources. If an accommodation request is denied, employees will have seven calendar days to request in writing (email is acceptable) a reconsideration from the Deputy City Manager, Lori Sassoon (lori.sassoon@cityofrc.us). The Deputy City Manager’s determination is final. This Side Letter of Agreement shall be incorporated into the MOU. The MOU shall remain in full force and effect except to the extent modified by this Side Letter of Agreement. This Side Letter of Agreement shall not be effective until ratified by the District Board and approved by the Fire Union Local 2274. For the Fire Protection District For the Fire Union Local 2274 ___________________________________ ___________________________________ John Gillison Chad Comeau, President City Manager Fire Union Local 2274 Page 150 ATTACHMENT 4 SIDE LETTER OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE FIRE SUPPORT SERVICES ASSOCIATION The Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District ("District") and the Fire Support Services Association (collectively, the "Parties") entered into a Memorandum of Understanding ("MOU") that commenced on July 1, 2021 and expires on June 30, 2025. The Parties met and conferred in good faith in August and September of 2021. The Parties agreed to a temporary COVID-19 vaccine incentive program. COVID-19 Vaccine Incentive Program In order to maintain a safe and healthy workplace, the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (District) wants to encourage employees to be “fully vaccinated” for COVID-19 in order to contain and mitigate the spread of COVID-19 within the workplace and the community. For those reasons, the District is desirous of implementing a COVID-19 Vaccine Incentive Program for all District employees. This program would be in place until November 30, 2021. Any current employee who is “fully vaccinated” and has provided “proof” would be eligible for the following incentives. Incentive: Full-Time Employees: Eligible full-time shift personnel would receive 24 hours of floating holiday time and eligible full-time 40-hour personnel would receive 20 hours of floating holiday time that must be used prior to June 30, 2022, in accordance with their existing MOU’s. These days may be taken by an employee at his or her convenience, subject to approval of the supervisor. The District recognizes that employees with qualifying disabilities under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and employees with sincerely held religious beliefs under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII) may request medical or religious accommodations in order to be considered eligible for this program. Qualifying employees are entitled to a reasonable accommodation process. The District has found that a reasonable accommodation for those that qualify for an accommodation is a weekly “COVID-19 test” at an “approved testing location” during working hours during the eligibility period of the program (adoption to November 30, 2021). This provides an alternate way to maintain a safe and healthy workplace. Employees requesting any statutory exemption from the eligibility requirements of this program may be required to provide supporting documentation, certification, or other evidence or information permissible by law. Requests for accommodation must be made within fourteen (14) calendar days of adoption of this policy. Each request will be considered under the applicable statutes, including the ADA and Title VII, but employees should understand that the District is not legally required to, provide accommodations to all employees who make such a request. Definitions: Page 151 ATTACHMENT 4 “fully vaccinated” The employer has documented that the person received, at least 14 days prior, either the second dose in a two-dose COVID-19 vaccine series or a single dose COVID- 19 vaccine. Vaccines must be FDA approved; or have an emergency use authorization from the FDA. “Proof” means valid documentation of the person’s COVID-19 vaccination record, which may be their vaccine card or a copy or a digital version thereof, as provided by their health care provider, the State Department of Public Health or another state or federal agency has been shared with the City HR Department. HR will review the proof but keep no copies. A confidential spreadsheet of those that are fully vaccinated will be maintained by the City “COVID-19 test” means a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test for SARS-CoV-2 that is both: (1) Approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) or has an Emergency Use Authorization from the FDA to diagnose current infection with the SARS-CoV-2 virus; and (2) Administered in accordance with the FDA approval or the FDA Emergency Use Authorization as applicable. Acceptable documentation of a COVID-19 test would be an electronic copy of the results as provided to the employee from an approved testing site. HR will review the documentation but keep no copies. A confidential spreadsheet of the weekly testing results will be maintained by the City. “approved testing locations” means the District’s approved COVID-19 tester, any San Bernardino County run COVID-19 testing location, or any testing location provided by an employee’s District offered Health Plan Care Provider. Employees must coordinate with their supervisor on testing times. The forms for requesting a medical or religious exemption are available from Human Resources. If an accommodation request is denied, employees will have seven calendar days to request in writing (email is acceptable) a reconsideration from the Deputy City Manager, Lori Sassoon (lori.sassoon@cityofrc.us). The Deputy City Manager’s determination is final. This Side Letter of Agreement shall be incorporated into the MOU. The MOU shall remain in full force and effect except to the extent modified by this Side Letter of Agreement. This Side Letter of Agreement shall not be effective until ratified by the District Board and approved by the Fire Support Services Association. For the Fire Protection District For the Fire Services Support Association ___________________________________ ___________________________________ John Gillison Shane Adams, President City Manager Fire Services Support Association Page 152 ATTACHMENT 5 NEW PART-TIME EMPLOYEE BENEFIT The Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District is providing a temporary COVID-19 vaccine incentive program for part-time employees. COVID-19 Vaccine Incentive Program In order to maintain a safe and healthy workplace, the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (District) wants to encourage employees to be “fully vaccinated” for COVID-19 in order to contain and mitigate the spread of COVID-19 within the workplace and the community. For those reasons, the District is desirous of implementing a COVID-19 Vaccine Incentive Program for all District employees. This program would be in place until November 30, 2021. Any current employee who is “fully vaccinated” and has provided “proof” would be eligible for the following incentives. Incentive: Part-Time Employees Eligible part time employees would receive 10 hours of floating holiday time which they can use on November 25, 2021 or December 25, 2021. Departments would work with their part-time employees and add 10 hours of floating holiday time onto their timecards for one of those two dates. The District recognizes that employees with qualifying disabilities under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and employees with sincerely held religious beliefs under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII) may request medical or religious accommodations in order to be considered eligible for this program. Qualifying employees are entitled to a reasonable accommodation process. The District has found that a reasonable accommodation for those that qualify for an accommodation is a weekly “COVID-19 test” at an “approved testing location” during working hours during the eligibility period of the program (adoption to November 30, 2021). This provides an alternate way to maintain a safe and healthy workplace. Employees requesting any statutory exemption from the eligibility requirements of this program may be required to provide supporting documentation, certification, or other evidence or information permissible by law. Requests for accommodation must be made within fourteen (14) calendar days of adoption of this policy. Each request will be considered under the applicable statutes, including the ADA and Title VII, but employees should understand that the District is not legally required to, provide accommodations to all employees who make such a request. Definitions: “fully vaccinated” The employer has documented that the person received, at least 14 days prior, either the second dose in a two-dose COVID-19 vaccine series or a single dose COVID- 19 vaccine. Vaccines must be FDA approved; or have an emergency use authorization from the FDA. Page 153 ATTACHMENT 5 “Proof” means valid documentation of the person’s COVID-19 vaccination record, which may be their vaccine card or a copy or a digital version thereof, as provided by their health care provider, the State Department of Public Health or another state or federal agency has been shared with the City HR Department. HR will review the proof but keep no copies. A confidential spreadsheet of those that are fully vaccinated will be maintained by the City “COVID-19 test” means a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test for SARS-CoV-2 that is both: (1) Approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) or has an Emergency Use Authorization from the FDA to diagnose current infection with the SARS-CoV-2 virus; and (2) Administered in accordance with the FDA approval or the FDA Emergency Use Authorization as applicable. Acceptable documentation of a COVID-19 test would be an electronic copy of the results as provided to the employee from an approved testing site. HR will review the documentation but keep no copies. A confidential spreadsheet of the weekly testing results will be maintained by the City. “approved testing locations” means the District’s approved COVID-19 tester, any San Bernardino County run COVID-19 testing location, or any testing location provided by an employee’s District offered Health Plan Care Provider. Employees must coordinate with their supervisor on testing times. The forms for requesting a medical or religious exemption are available from Human Resources. If an accommodation request is denied, employees will have seven calendar days to request in writing (email is acceptable) a reconsideration from the Deputy City Manager, Lori Sassoon (lori.sassoon@cityofrc.us). The Deputy City Manager’s determination is final. Page 154 DATE:September 15, 2021 TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY:Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services SUBJECT:Consideration of an Amendment to the Agreement for Professional Services with SMG-Rancho Cucamonga Premier Food Services LLC for Comprehensive Event and Meeting Sales, Management, Catering, and Concession Services for Certain Spaces at the Victoria Gardens Cultural Center and Lewis Family Playhouse. (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council approve the amendment based on the terms outlined in this staff report, and authorize the City Manager to work with the City Attorney to finalize and execute the agreement. BACKGROUND: On May 20, 2019, the City Council authorized a five (5) year agreement with SMG-Rancho Cucamonga Premier Food Services LLC for catering and concession services at the Victoria Gardens Cultural Center, Lewis Family Playhouse, and bar service at the Paul A. Biane Library. Under that agreement, SMG provided catering services for the various events booked at these sites and providing a share of gross receipts back to the City and the Community Foundation. These sites are booked and managed for meetings and other events by City staff. In March of 2020, Cultural Center and Lewis Family Playhouse were forced to close as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. Staffing levels were reduced, and spaces have gone largely unused since that time, except for City meetings and other city business. Use was first limited as a result of the State and County health orders, and then more recently due to a variety of factors including reduced demand, staffing levels, concerns about future COVID “spikes”, and just general uncertainty in the marketplace for events and shows. While unexpected, this interim time and forced “pause” in operations has provided the Community Services Department (CSD) with an opportunity to comprehensively study operations at the Cultural Center and think strategically about the future of how best to deliver services. The City’s consultant team has surveyed the community, gathered data regarding market demand various types of programs, and is analyzing where the opportunities and challenges are as the facility moves forward into its next decade of operations. That work is ongoing and expected to conclude in the coming months, resulting in a strategic plan for the future. ANALYSIS: SMG-Rancho Cucamonga Premier Food Services is an LLC held by AMG, the same entity that manages the Ontario Convention Center, the Toyota Arena, and the Greater Ontario Tourism and Page 155 Page 2 9 6 9 Marketing District (GOTMD). The City is a partner in the GOTMD, which is tasked with marketing the area to visitors with the goal of increasing hotel stays and economic activity. The City has been a partner with the GOTMD since its formation in 2012. Recently, SMG-Premier expressed interest in an opportunity to manage the meeting room spaces at the Cultural Center on an interim basis. SMG-Premier has a sales team that is selling the Convention Center and Arena spaces, and is well-equipped to also market the meeting and event spaces at the Cultural Center. They have indicated that they have demand for smaller meeting room spaces in the area like the meeting spaces available in the Cultural Center. Staff is recommending approval of a one year comprehensive management agreement for the Celebration Hall, Imagination Courtyard, Black Box Theater, and MainStreet lobby spaces. The Lewis Family Playhouse would not be included in these comprehensive management services, but SMG-Premier would continue to be the exclusive caterer/concessionaire for theater events that are programmed by the City. Key terms of the one-year agreement are as follows: Minimum payment to the City of $20,000 per month, or 25% of all gross receipts from room rentals, catering, etc., whichever is more One year term; at the end of the year, the agreement reverts back to the catering/concession agreement SMG-Premier will provide all staffing, food, beverages and supplies for its spaces, including custodial services associated with its use; City to continue maintenance and repairs of the facility City to retain the right for City events in the spaces, at no cost to the City City and SMG-Premier agree to coordinate bookings and calendars for their respective spaces During this agreement period, CSD staff from the Cultural Center will continue in their current roles in the Department, working on those future plans and planning for the next Playhouse season, slated to begin in late 2022. It is recommended that the proceeds from this agreement be appropriated into the CSD budget to provide additional community programming. With the budget reductions that resulted from the COVID-related decline in revenues, there is a need to enhance programming to meet community needs. This additional revenue source will provide that opportunity. As of this writing, the amendment is drafted and pending approval by SMG-Premier. Staff recommends that the City Council approve the amendment based on the terms outlined in this staff report, and authorize the City Manager to work with the City Attorney to finalize and execute the agreement, as long as it substantially conforms to the terms noted in this report. The draft amendment to the agreement is on file for review in the City Clerk’s Office. FISCAL IMPACT: As noted above, approval of this agreement is expected to provide at least $240,000 in new revenue to the City, that will be reinvested in community recreation and cultural programming. Page 156 Page 3 9 6 9 COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: Approval of this agreement is in keeping with the Council’s value of providing and nurturing a high quality of life for all, by making the City’s facilities available for events, and generating new revenue to the City for enhanced community programming. ATTACHMENTS: None Page 157 Consideration of Amended Agreement with SMG-Premier Background •Five-year exclusive concession agreement with SMG- Premier approved May 2019 •Catering and concessions at VGCC, Lewis Family Playhouse; bar service at Biane Library •A percentage of gross receipts from catering shared back to the City Challenges •March 2020 forced closure of the Cultural Center and Lewis Family Playhouse –Reduced staff –Spaces largely unused because of health orders, then other uncertainty in the market •Visioning and Strategic Planning in progress for all of CSD, and VGCC, during this “pause” in operations Proposed Agreement •SMG-Premier would provide comprehensive management of the meeting room spaces at VGCC –International company specializing in venue operations (ASM Global, formerly SMG and AEG) –Currently provides services at Ontario Arena and the Convention Center –Existing sales team in place has demand for smaller meeting and event spaces Key Terms •One year agreement •Comprehensive management services for Celebration Hall, Imagination Courtyard, Black Box Theater, and MainStreet Lobby (not the Playhouse) •Services include all sales, staffing, food, beverage, supplies, and custodial services •Payment to the City of $20,000 per month, or 25% of all gross receipts, whichever is more •City to retain rights to use spaces for City events, at no cost •SMG-Premier retains exclusive right to concessions for Theater events, under the same terms as the prior agreement Fiscal Impact •New revenue of at least $240,000 for the agreement term •Recommend that funds be allocated to Community Services for additional community programming –Details TBD Other Considerations •SMG-Premier requested an extension of the original concession agreement, in light of COVID closure •Staff recommends the requested extension -to be brought back to City Council for approval near the expiration of this amendment (mid-2022) Recommendation Approve the amendment and authorize the City Manager to execute the amendment, working with the City Attorney to finalize the document as long as it substantially conforms to the terms noted in the staff report. DATE:September 15, 2021 TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY:Shelly Munson, Deputy Director of Innovation and Technology SUBJECT:Consideration to Approve Amendment No. 001 to Contract No. 18-121 with KWall, LLC. for Additional Website Development. (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council approve Amendment No. 001 to Contract No.18-121 with KWall, LLC increasing the total spending authority by $60,000, from $250,000 to $310,000 over the life of the 5-year agreement ending in 2023. BACKGROUND: The City’s website has become a central platform to provide information and access to services for our community and the region. Rancho Cucamonga’s home website, www.cityofrc.us, had over 2.4 million page views in 2020 with over 720,000 unique users. Our website provides digital access to several City services, including development, recreation, learning, open government, and pet adoption, improving efficiency and providing improved access to in-person resources for those who need or prefer personal assistance. The Department of Innovation and Technology manages the City’s public facing websites, overseeing development, support, patching and updates to ensure availability, performance and security of our City’s online presence. In 2018 Council approved re-building the public website using Drupal content management and Acquia hosting services, improving the website’s performance and streamlining content. Council also approved Contract No. 18-121 with KWall, LLC. to provide development, support and maintenance services using technical services hours purchased at pre-negotiated hourly rate. This provides the City with the ability to make incremental improvements and critical updates to the City’s public website while controlling costs. ANALYSIS: At the time the existing Contract No. 18-121 was enacted we estimated the number of support hours needed per year based on minimal improvements or security updates over the life of the agreement. An unforeseen outcome of the global pandemic was a sharp rise in cybersecurity threats and attacks specifically on local governments, requiring increased security updates and web development services from KWall, LLC. Additionally, in September 2021 DoIT was made aware of the planned end-of-support for Drupal 8 effective November 1, 2021. Like many software applications, Drupal is released in versions to manage the functionality and security of websites using the platform. Upon reaching end-of-support Drupal version 8 will no longer receive patching and updates, requiring an update to Version 9 to remain secure and ensure continued support and performance. The project to move our website from Drupal version 8 to 9 is quoted at Page 158 Page 2 9 6 7 approximately 40 technical service hours, which will deplete our current service hour bank through October 2023. Based on our rate of consumption since 2018, DoIT staff believes that 400 additional hours will be sufficient to cover all future development, service and security update costs through the end of the agreement in 2023. Purchasing these hours at the current firm-fixed rate shields the City from additional wage inflation costs and ensures we have on-demand resources for exigent responses should they occur. Copies of Contract No. 18-121 and Amendment No. 001 are on file with the City Clerk’s Office. FISCAL IMPACT: DoIT will utilize existing funds in Account No. 1001209-5300 (Professional Services) from anticipated savings on other projects and will evaluate the overall fiscal impact as part of the mid- year budget process. COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: This item addresses the City Council’s Core Value of enhancing premier community status by ensuring a secure and operational City website as a communication and information portal for the community. ATTACHMENTS: None Page 159 DATE:September 15, 2021 TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY:Anne McIntosh, AICP, Planning Director Jennifer Nakamura, Management Analyst II SUBJECT:Consideration of Second Reading and Adoption of the Following: Ordinance No. 983 An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, Adopting Municipal Code Amendment DRC2021-00281 to Amend Table 17.26.020-1, Section 17.30.030, Table 17.30.030-1, and Section 17.36.030 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to Establish Three New Zoning Districts and Adopt Associated Development Standards and Permitted Uses for Each New Zoning District, Adopting Zoning Map Amendment DRC2021-00283 to Rezone Certain Parcels as Set Forth Herein, Adopting an Addendum to the General Plan Program Environmental Impact Report Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, and Making Findings in Support Thereof Ordinance No. 984 An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, Approving Planned Community Amendment DRC2021-00284 to Amend the Terra Vista Planned Community to Rezone 13 Parcels to the New Urban Corridor Zoning District, Adopting an Addendum to the General Plan Program Environmental Impact Report Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, and Making Findings in Support Thereof Ordinance No. 985 An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, Adopting Planned Community Amendment DRC2021-00285 to Amend the Victoria Planned Community to Rezone Six Parcels Within the Specific Plan to the New Urban Center Zoning District, Adopting an Addendum to the General Plan Program Environmental Impact Report Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, and Making Findings in Support Thereof RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council waive full reading and adopt Ordinances 983, 984 and 985. BACKGROUND: The introduction and first reading of the above-entitled Ordinances was conducted at the Regular City Council Meeting of September 1, 2021. Votes at first reading: AYES: Kennedy, Hutchison, Scott, Michael. ABSENT: Spagnolo. ANALYSIS: Please refer to the September 1, 2021 City Council Staff Report. Page 160 Page 2 9 5 8 FISCAL IMPACT: Please refer to the September 1, 2021 City Council Staff Report. COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: Please refer to the September 1, 2021 City Council Staff Report. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 – Ordinance No. 983 Attachment 2 – Ordinance No. 984 Attachment 3 – Ordinance No. 985 Page 161 ORDINANCE NO. 983 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT DRC2021-00281 TO AMEND TABLE 17.26.020-1, SECTION 17.30.030, TABLE 17.30.030-1, and SECTION 17.36.030 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE TO ESTABLISH THREE NEW ZONING DISTRICTS AND ADOPT ASSOCIATED DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND PERMITTED USES FOR EACH NEW ZONING DISTRICT, ADOPTING ZONING MAP AMENDMENT DRC2021-00283 TO REZONE CERTAIN PARCELS AS SET FORTH HEREIN, ADOPTING AN ADDENDUM TO THE GENERAL PLAN PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF A.Recitals. 1.The City of Rancho Cucamonga is required by law to update the Housing Element of its General Plan for the planning period of October 2021 through October 2029. In connection with that requirement, the City is currently in the process of updating its Housing Element as part of the PlanRC General Plan process. The City is on track to adopt the new General Plan, including the Housing Element, in accordance with the deadlines set forth in State law. 2. Current housing law states that if a city cannot show that it has the capacity to accommodate the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) based on its existing planning and zoning framework as of October 15, 2021, the city is considered to have a “shortfall” in capacity. If a city has a shortfall, the city then must include a program in its housing element to rezone specific sites to show capacity to meet the shortfall based on new zoning standards for specific sites. The rezoning program for sites used to demonstrate capacity for the very low and low income RHNA allocations must rezone those sites to create a “by-right” process for developments that include 20 percent of the units for lower income households. 3. The City is proposing to amend its current General Plan, Development Code, Zoning Map and related special planning documents for selected parcels to ensure that enough sites are zoned to meet the RHNA requirements as of October 15, 2021 and to avoid the shortfall. The City has prepared a set of amendments for this purpose, including Municipal Code Amendment DRC2021-0028 and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2021-00283 as described in the title of this Ordinance (the “Amendment”). 4. As shown in Exhibit “A”, the Amendment proposes to amend the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code to establish three new zoning districts, establish development standards and permitted uses for each new zoning district, and to remove several parcels from certain overlay districts. The Amendment also proposes amend the City’s Zoning Map to rezone 41 parcels within the City to one of the three new zoning districts. 5. Concurrent with this Amendment, the City has prepared General Plan Amendment DRC 2021-00281, Planned Community Amendment DRC2021-00284, Specific Plan Amendment DRC2021-00285, and Master Plan Amendment DRC2021-00286. The collective purpose of these amendments is to ensure that enough sites within the City are zoned to meet the RHNA requirements by October 15, 2021 and to avoid any shortfall. 11231-0001\2569110v1.doc Attachment 1Page162 6. On August 11, 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the Amendment and concluded said hearing on that date. 7. On September 1, 2021, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the Amendment, and all interested persons were given an opportunity to present oral and written evidence regarding the Amendment and the addendum to the General Plan Program Environmental Impact Report (SCH #2000061027), and concluded said hearing on that date. 8. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B.Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and ordained by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1.Recitals. The City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. 2. Findings. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to the City Council during the above-referenced public hearing on September 1, 2021, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, the City Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The Amendment identified herein has been processed, including, but not limited to, public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law, including the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”). b.Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) and the City’s local CEQA Guidelines, an addendum to the General Plan Program Environmental Impact Report (SCH #2000061027) has been prepared. The addendum concludes that the proposed Amendment and other amendments intended to create sufficient housing capacity do not result in any new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects beyond what was analyzed in the certified EIR. No new information has become available and no substantial changes to the circumstances under which implementation of the General Plan was being undertaken since the certification of the EIR have occurred. The proposed Amendment would not substantially increase the severity of effects relative to the environmental topics analyzed in the Certified EIR, nor would the project require new mitigation measures or alternatives. Based on this evidence and all the evidence in the record, the City Council concurs with the Planning Commission and Planning Department staff’s determination that the Amendment will not have a significant effect on the environment and an addendum is the appropriate level of environmental review under CEQA. The City Council has considered the proposed addendum attached to the staff report accompanying the Amendment, along with the General Plan Program Final EIR, and hereby adopts the addendum. c.The Amendment is consistent with the direction, goals, policies, and implementation programs of the adopted General Plan, including without limitation, the Land Use Element thereof (as amended), and will provide for development in a manner consistent with the General Plan. d.Subject to the approval of the related amendments (General Plan Amendment DRC 2021-00281, Planned Community Amendment DRC2021-00284, Specific Plan Amendment DRC2021-00285, and Master Plan Amendment DRC2021-00286), the Amendment does not conflict with the policies and provisions of the proposed General Plan, Planned Community, Specific Plan, and Master Plan amendments identified herein. Page 163 e. The City Council finds that the Amendment serves the important purpose of providing sufficient opportunities for housing development within the City to meet demand at all income levels in accordance with its assigned RHNA. The City Council further finds that maintaining some local control over the planning and development process for new residential projects is important for purposes of protecting the public health, safety, and welfare. Therefore, this Amendment is needed to ensure that the City does not have a housing shortfall as of October 15, 2021. f. The findings set forth in this Ordinance reflect the independent judgment of the City Council. 3. Determination on DRC2021-0028. Based on the findings set forth in this Ordinance and the totality of the administrative record before it, the City Council hereby approves Municipal Code Amendment DRC2021-0028. 4. The City Council hereby amends Section 17.26.020 (“Zoning Districts Established”), including Table 17.26.020-1 (“Rancho Cucamonga Zoning Districts”), of Chapter 17.26 (“Establishment of Zoning Districts”) of Article III (“Zoning Districts, Allowed Uses, and Development Standards”) of Title 17 (“Development Code”) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to read as follows: “17.26.020 Zoning districts established. A. Zoning district purpose. Zoning districts are established in order to classify, regulate, designate, and distribute the uses of land and buildings; to regulate and restrict the height, setbacks and bulk of buildings; to regulate the area of yards and other open spaces around buildings; and to regulate the density of population. The city is divided into zoning districts that are grouped into two categories: (a) base zoning districts and (b) overlay zoning districts. These districts are listed and described in Table 17.26.020-1 (Rancho Cucamonga Zoning Districts), along with the general plan land use designation that they implement. B. Base zoning districts. The base zoning district is the primary zoning district that applies to a property. Every parcel throughout the city has a base zoning district that establishes the primary land use type, density, intensity, and site development regulations. Base districts are grouped into six categories as follows: 1. Residential Zoning Districts. 2. Mixed Use Zoning Districts. 3. Commercial and Office Zoning Districts. 4. Industrial Zoning Districts. 5. Open Space Zoning Districts. 6. Special Purpose Zoning Districts. C. Overlay zoning districts. The Overlay Zoning Districts supplement base zoning districts for one or more of the following purposes: 1. To allow more flexibility from the standard provisions of the underlying base zone. 2. To protect unique site features or implement location-specific regulations. 3. To specify a particular standard or guideline for an area. D. In the event of a conflict between the regulations of the base zoning district and the Overlay Zoning District, the provisions of the Overlay Zoning District shall apply. TABLE 17.26.020-1 RANCHO CUCAMONGA ZONING DISTRICTS Zoning District Symbol Zoning District Name/Description Page 164 Zoning District Symbol Zoning District Name/Description Residential Zoning Districts VL Very Low Residential. Designates areas for very low density residential use, with a minimum lot size of 20,000 square feet and a maximum residential density of up to 2 units per gross acre. L Low Residential. Designates areas for single-family residential use, with a minimum lot size of 7,200 square feet and a maximum residential density of 4 units per gross acre. LM Low Medium Residential. Designates areas for low medium density single-family or multiple-family use with site development regulations that assure development compatible with nearby single-family detached neighborhoods. Residential densities range from 4 to 8 units per gross acre maximum. M Medium Residential. Designates areas for medium density multiple-family use, with site development regulations that assure development compatible with nearby lowe r density residential development. Residential densities range from 8 to 14 units per gross acre maximum. MH Medium High Residential. Designates areas for medium high density multiple-family use, with site development regulations that assure development compatible with nearby lower density residential development. Residential densities range from 14 to 24 units per gross acre maximum. H High Residential. Designates areas for high density multiple-family use, with site development regulations that assure development compatible with nearby lower density residential development. Residential densities range from 24 to 30 units per gross acre. Mixed Use Zoning Districts MU Mixed Use. Designates areas for a mix of residential and nonresidential uses, with site development regulations that assure development compatible with nearby lower density residential development, as well as internal compatibility among the varying uses. MU-GU Mixed Use – General Urban. Designates areas for a mix of residential and non- residential uses of lower intensity, with site development standards that assure buildings create walkable streets and transition in scale to surrounding neighborhoods. MU- UCR Mixed Use – Urban Corridor. Designates areas for a mix of residential and nonresidential uses of medium to high intensity, with site development regulations that assure buildings create a vibrant pedestrian environment and transition in scale to surrounding neighborhoods. MU-UCT Mixed Use – Urban Center. Designates areas for a mix of residential and non- residential uses of high intensity, with site development regulations that allow for infill development with buildings that transition in scale to surrounding neighborhoods. Commercial and Office Zoning Districts OP Office/Professional. Designates areas primarily for the development of professional/administrative offices and personal services rather than commodities. Site development regulations and performance standards are designed to make such uses relatively compatible with residential uses. NC Neighborhood Commercial. Designates areas for immediate day-to-day convenience shopping and services for the residents of the immediate neighborhood. Site development regulations and performance standards are intended to make such uses compatible to and harmonious with the character of surrounding residential or less intense land use area. Page 165 Zoning District Symbol Zoning District Name/Description GC General Commercial. Designates areas for general commercial activities and services of a more intensive nature, including but not limited to major shopping facilities, major service-oriented uses, major financial, and corporate headquarters that are designed to serve the city or the region as a whole and are typically located primarily along major transportation routes. CC Community Commercial. Designates areas for commercial activities and services on a larger scale. Businesses are typically auto oriented and located along major commercial corridors. SC Specialty Commercial. Designates areas designed to enhance the character around historic resources or sites which promote a special landmark quality or create a special ambience. Examples include specialty theme-oriented uses located adjacent to the Thomas Brothers Winery, which complement the existing winery structure and provide a unifying theme or the establishment of tourist-oriented specialty uses in other areas, which cater to visitors. A limited number of office uses have been included into the specialty commercial category in order to facilitate an interactive office/commercial environment. RRC Regional Related Commercial. Designates areas for large-scale commercial development that serves both local and regional needs. Sites are easily accessible from freeways and may contain a variety of goods and services, such as large- format retail, department stores, eating and drinking establishments, hotels, and motels. CO Commercial Office. Designates areas for activities that cater to business support and personal services. Uses typically include medical and health care clinics, travel agencies, insurance agencies, copy centers, and other similar land uses. Industrial Zoning Districts IP Industrial Park. Designates areas for industrial firms seeking an attractive and pleasant working environment and a location which has prestige value. The district allows light industrial uses, office and administration facilities, research and development laboratories, and limited types of warehousing, as well as support businesses and commercial service uses. NI Neo-Industrial. Designates areas to support a complementary mix of uses such as, research and development, light and custom manufacturing, engineering and design services, breweries, and maker spaces, as well as accessory office, retail and limited residential uses to compliment the primary use; supportive amenities and services; and convenient transit access. This zoning district encourages light industrial activities with low environmental impacts and supports the growth of creative industries, incubator businesses, and innovative design and manufacturing. The zoning district can allow for small scale, context sensitive warehousing, distribution and manufacturing to support small business development. IE Industrial Employment. Designates areas reserved for manufacturing, processing, construction and heavy equipment yards, warehousing and storage, e-commerce distribution, light industrial research parks, automobile and vehicle services, and a broad range of similar clean industrial practices and processes that typically generate more truck traffic, noise, and environmental impacts than would be compatible with office and residential uses. This zoning district prohibits non-industrial uses, except for accessory office and commercial uses (such as restaurants or convenience stores) that support the employees of the primary industrial use, and on-site caretaker units. Open Space Zoning Districts OS Open Space. Designates areas primarily to protect environmentally sensitive land. Page 166 Zoning District Symbol Zoning District Name/Description The use regulations, development standards, and criteria provide low intensity development and encourage recreational activities and preservation of natural resources. HR Hillside Residential. Designates areas for maintaining natural open space character through protection of natural landforms; minimizing erosion; providing for public safety; protecting water, flora, and fauna resources; and establishing design standards to provide for limited development in harmony with the environment. Allowed density is a maximum of 2 units per net buildable acre as determined through the Hillside Development Review process. FC Flood Control. Designates areas necessary for flood control facilities for protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. UC Utility Corridor. Designates areas within utility corridors in which land uses compatible to both the utility function and surrounding, existing, or proposed land uses are allowed. Special Purpose Zoning Districts SP Specific Plan. Designates areas for master planning through the adoption of a specific plan with unique land use and development standards for a particular project areas with a minimum of 300 acres. PC Planned Community. Designates areas master planning through the adoption of a Planned Community, which can establish unique land use and development standards for a particular project area. Planned Communities typically include less detail than specific plans and have no minimum project size requirement. Overlay Zoning Districts SH Senior Housing. Designates areas available for affordable rental housing units to serve the city’s senior citizens. District provisions ensure high quality project design and establish incentives for ongoing affordability for this target group. This district can be combined with any residential base zoning district that meets the overlay district qualifications. E Equestrian. Designates areas for the keeping of equine, bovine, and cleft-hoofed animals. Further, this district protects the ability to maintain such animals, promotes a “rural/farm” character in an urban setting, and recognizes and encourages the educational and recreational values derived from raising and maintaining such animals. This district may be combined with any residential base zoning district that meets the overlay district qualifications. FB Foothill Boulevard. Designates areas along Foothill Boulevard for special use and development regulations to implement the goals and objectives in the general plan for this important corridor that covers most of the length of Historic Route 66 through the city. Special regulations encourage a mix of uses, concentrate neighborhood, community, and regional-serving uses as appropriate, and accommodate future transit. H Hillside. Designates sloped areas subject to special hillside development regulations. Generally, this district applies to areas with a slope greater than or equal to 8%. This district may be combined with any residential base zoning district that meets the overlay district qualifications. HA Haven Avenue. Designates an area along Haven Avenue with unique allowed use regulations and development standards focused on high quality office opportunities. IC Industrial Commercial. Designates areas with an Industrial Park Base Zoning District to encourage and support the integration of traditional general commercial uses and special development review requirements focused on retail opportunities. LW Large Warehouse. Designates area where large industrial buildings with a gross Page 167 Zoning District Symbol Zoning District Name/Description floor area over 450,000 square feet are permitted.” 5. The City Council hereby amends Section 17.30.030 (“Allowed Land Uses and Permit Requirements”), including Table 17.30.030-1 (“Allowed Land Uses and Permit Requirements by Base Zoning District”), of Chapter 17.30 (“Allowed Land Uses by Base Zoning District”) of Article III (“Zoning Districts, Allowed Uses, and Development Standards”) of Title 17 (“Development Code”) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to read as follows: “17.30.030 Allowed land uses and permit requirements. A. Allowed land uses. Allowed uses and corresponding permit and entitlement requirements for the base zoning districts are listed in Table 17.30.030-1 (Allowed Land Uses and Permit Requirements by Base Zoning District). Uses are organized into common categories as follows: 1. Residential uses. 2. Agriculture and animal related uses. 3. Recreation, resource preservation, open space, education, and public assembly uses. 4. Utility, transportation, public facility, and communication uses. 5. Retail, service, and office uses. 6. Automobile and vehicle uses. 7. Industrial, manufacturing, and processing uses. B. Permit requirements. Generally, a use is either allowed by right, allowed through issuance of a conditional use permit, or not permitted. In addition to the requirements for planning permits or entitlements listed herein, other permits and entitlements may be required prior to establishment of the use (e.g., building permit or permits required by other agencies). The requirements for planning permits or entitlements identified in Table 17.30.030-1 (Allowed Land Uses and Permit Requirements by Base Zoning District) include: 1. Permitted (P). A land use shown with a “P” indicates that the land use is permitted by right in the designated zoning district, subject to compliance with all applicable provisions of this title (e.g., development standards) as well state and federal law. 2. Conditionally permitted (C). A land use shown with a “C” indicates that the land use is permitted in the designated zoning district upon issuance of a conditional use permit from the designated approving authority, subject to compliance with all applicable provisions of this zoning code (e.g., development standards) as well as state and federal law. 3. Minor use permit (M). A land use shown with an “M” indicates that the land use is permitted in the designated zoning district upon issuance of a minor use permit from the designated approving authority, subject to compliance with all applicable provisions of this zoning code (e.g., development standards) as well as state and federal law. 4. Not permitted (N). A land use shown with an “N” is not allowed in the applicable zoning district. Additionally, uses not shown in the table are not permitted, except as otherwise provided for in this title. 5. Adult entertainment permit (A). A land use shown with an “A” indicates that the land use is permitted in the designated zoning district upon issuance of an adult entertainment permit from the designated approving authority, subject to compliance with all applicable provisions of this zoning code (e.g., development operational standards) as well as state and federal law. Page 168 C. Base zoning district names and symbols. Base zoning district names for the zoning district symbols used in the table are listed below. Specific Plan (SP) District and Planned Community (PC) District are not listed in the table as the allowed uses for those base zoning districts are determined in compliance with the adopted Specific Plan or Planned Community. • Very Low Residential (VL) • Specialty Commercial (SC) • Low Residential (L) • Regional Related Commercial (RRC) • Low Medium Residential (LM) • Commercial Office (CO) • Medium Residential (M) • Industrial Park (IP) • Medium High Residential (MH) • Neo-Industrial (NI) • High Residential (H) • Industrial Employment (IE) • Mixed Use (MU) • Open Space (OS) • Mixed Use – General Urban (MU-GU) • Hillside Residential District (HR) • Mixed Use – Urban Corridor (MU-UCR) • Flood Control-Open Space (FC) • Mixed Use – Urban Center (MU-UCT) • Utility Corridor-Open Space (UC) • Office Professional (OP) • Neighborhood Commercial (NC) • General Commercial (GC) • Community Commercial (CC) TABLE 17.30.030-1: ALLOWED LAND USES AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS BY BASE ZONING DISTRICT Land Use/Zoning District VL L LM M MH H MU MU- GU MU- UCR MU- UCT OP NC GC CC SC RRC CO IP NI IE OS HR FC UC Residential Uses Adult Day Care Home P P P P P P P P P P N N N N N N N N N N N P N N Caretaker Housing M M M M M M M M M M P P P N N N N M M M P M P P Dwelling, Multi-Family N N P P P P P P P P N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Dwelling, Single- Family P P P P N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P P N N Dwelling, Two-Family N N P P P P P P P P N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Emergency Shelter N N N N N N N N N N N N P N N N N N C N N N N N Family Day Care Home, Large (11) M M M M M M M M M M N N N N N N N N N N N M N N Family Day Care Home, Small P P P P P P P P P P N N N N N N N N N N N P N N Guest House P P P N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Group Residential M M M M M M M M M M M M M M N M N N N N N M N N Home Occupation (2) P P P P P P P P P P N N N N N N N N N N P P N N Live-Work Facility N N N N N N P P P P N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Manufactured Home (3) P P P P N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P N N Mobile Home Park (3) M M M M M M N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Residential Care Facility N M M M M M M M M M N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Residential Care Home P P P P P P N P P P N N N N N N N N N N N P N N Short-Term Rental(16) P P P P P P P P P P P P N N P P P P N P P P P P Single-Room Occupancy Facility N N N P P P P P P P N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Transitional Housing P P P P P P P P P P N N N N N N N N N N N P N N Agriculture and Animal-Related Uses Agricultural Uses N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P N P P Animal Keeping, Domestic Pets (4) P P P P P P P P P P N N N N N N N N N N N P N N Animal Keeping, Exotic Animals (4) M M M M M M M M M M N N N N N N N N N N N M N N Animal Keeping, Insects (4) P N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Animal Keeping, Livestock Animals (4) P P N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M N N N N N N Animal Keeping, Poultry (4) P N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M N N N N N N Equestrian Facility, Commercial M N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M N M M Page 169 Equestrian Facility, Hobby P N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Land Use/Zoning District VL L LM M MH H MU MU- GU MU- UCR MU- UCT OP NC GC CC SC RRC CO IP NI IE OS HR FC UC Recreation, Resource Preservation, Open Space, Education, and Public Assembly Uses Assembly Use M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M C N N N N N Cemetery/Mausoleum N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M N N N Community Center/Civic Use M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M N P P N N M N N Community Garden M M M M M M N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P N P P Convention Center N N N N N N M M M M M M M M M M M M C C N N N N Golf Course/Clubhouse N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M N M M Indoor Amusement/ Entertainment Facility N N N N N N M M M M N M M P P P N M C N N N N N Indoor Fitness and Sports Facility—Large N N N N N N M M M M M M M M M M M M C N N N N N Indoor Fitness and Sports Facility—Small N N N N N N P P P P P P P P M P P M C N N N N N Library and Museum M M M M M M P P P P P P P N P N P M N N M M M M Outdoor Commercial Recreation N N N N N N M M M M M M M N N M M M C N N N N N Park and Public Plaza P P P P P P P P P P N N N N N N N M M M P P P P Public Safety Facility M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M C C N M N N Resource-Related Recreation P P P P P P P P P P N N N N N N N N N N P P P P School, Academic (Private) M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M C N N M N N School, Academic (Public) P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P N N P N N School, College/University (Private) M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M C N N M N N School, College/University (Public) M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M C N N C N N Schools, Specialized Education and Training/Studio N N N N N N M M M M M M M M M M M C C C N N N N Theaters and Auditoriums N N N N N N M M M M N N M N N P N N N N N N N N Tutoring Center—Large N N N N N N M M M M M M M M M M M N N N N N N N Tutoring Center—Small N N N N N N P P P P P P P P P P P N N N N N N N Utility, Transportation, Public Facility, and Communication Uses Broadcasting and Recording Studios N N N N N N N N N N P N P N N N P P P N N N N N Park and Ride Facility N N N N N N N N N N M M M N N N N C P C N N N N Parking Facility N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Transit Facility N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M C C N N N N Utility Facility and Infrastructure—Fixed Based Structures (5, 12) N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M C C C N M M Utility Facility and Infrastructure— Pipelines (5) P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P Wind Energy System— Small (10) P N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P P P N N N N Land Use/Zoning District VL L LM M MH H MU MU- GU MU- UCR MU- UCT OP NC GC CC SC RRC CO IP NI IE OS HR FC UC Retail, Service, and Office Uses Adult Day Care Facility N N N N N N M M M M M M M N N N M C C N N N N N Adult-Oriented Business (6) N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N A A A N N N N Alcoholic Beverage Sales N N N N N N M M M M N M M M M M M M M N N N N N Ambulance Service N N N N N N N N N N M M M N N N N N C P N N N N Animal Sales and Grooming N N N N N N P P P P N P P P P N N N N N N N N N Art, Antique, Collectable Shop (13) N N N N N N P P P P N P P P P P N N N N N N N N Artisan Shop (13) N N N N N N P P P P N P P P P P N N N N N N N N Bail Bonds N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Banks and Financial Services N N N N N N M M M M M M P P P P P P P N N N N N Bar/Nightclub N N N N N N M M M M M N M M M M M N C N N N N N Page 170 Bed and Breakfast Inn M M M N N N N N N N N N N M M N N N N N N N N N Building Materials Store and Yard N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M P N N N N Business Support Services N N N N N N P P P P P P P P P P P P P P N N N N Call Center N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M M C N N N N Card Room N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Check Cashing Business (7) N N N N N N P P P P N P P N N N N P N N N N N N Child Day Care Facility/Center N N N N N N M M M M M M M M N M M M P P N N N N Commercial Cannabis Activity N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Consignment Store N N N N N N M M M M N M M N M N N N N N N N N N Convenience Store N N N N N N P P P P N P P N M N N M M N N N N N Crematory Services (7) N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M N N N N N Drive-In and Drive- Through Sales and Service (8) N N N N N N M M M M M M M M N M M M M N N N N N Land Use/Zoning District VL L LM M MH H MU MU- GU MU- UCR MU- UCT OP NC GC CC SC RRC CO IP NI IE OS HR FC UC Equipment Sales and Rental N N N N N N N N N N N N M N N N N N C P N N N N Feed and Tack Store N N N N N N N N N N N P P N N N N N N N N N N N Furniture, Furnishing, and Appliance Store N N N N N N P P P P N P P P P P N N N N N N N N Garden Center/Plant Nursery N N N N N N P P P P N P P P N P N N P P P N P P Grocery Store/Supermarket N N N N N N P P P P N P P P N P N N N N N N N N Gun Sales N N N N N N N N N N N N M N N N N M M N N N N N Hookah Shop N N N N N N M M M M N N M N N N N N N N N N N N Home Improvement Supply Store N N N N N N P P P P N P P P N P N M P P N N N N Hotel N N N N N N M M M M M N M N N M M M N N N N N N Internet Café N N N N N N P P P P P P P P P P P P P P N N N N Kennel, Commercial N N N N N N N N N N N N M M N M N M C N N N N N Liquor Store N N N N N N M M M M N M M M M M N M M N N N N N Maintenance and Repair, Small Equipment N N N N N N P P P P N P P P N P P P P P N N N N Massage Establishment (14) N N N N N N P P P P P P P P P P P N N N N N N N Massage Establishment, Ancillary (14) N N N N N N P P P P P P P P P P P P P N N N N N Medical Services, Extended Care N M M M M M M M M M P N P P N N P P P N N N N N Medical Services, General N N N N N N P P P P P P P P P P P P P N N N N N Medical Services, Hospitals N N M M M M M M M M M N M N N N N P P N N N N N Land Use/Zoning District VL L LM M MH H MU MU- GU MU- UCR MU- UCT OP NC GC CC SC RRC CO IP NI IE OS HR FC UC Mobile Hot Food Truck N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P P N N N N Mortuary/Funeral Home N N N N N N N N N N M M M N N N N N N N N N N N Office, Business and Professional N N N N N N P P P P P P P P P P P P P N N N N N Office, Accessory N N N N N N P P P P P P P P P P P P P P N N N N Pawnshop (7) N N N N N N N N N N N N M N N N N N N N N N N N Personal Services N N N N N N P P P P P P P P P P P P P P N N N N Restaurant, No Liquor Service N N N N N N P P P P P P P P P P P P P P N N N N Restaurant, Beer and Wine N N N N N N P P P P P P P P P P P P P C N N N N Restaurant, Full Liquor Service N N N N N N M M M M M M M M M M M M M N N N N N Retail, Accessory N N N N N N P P P P P P P P N P P M M P N N N N Retail, General N N N N N N P P P P N P P P P P N M M C N N N N Retail, Warehouse Club N N N N N N P P P P N N P P N P N P N N N N N N Secondhand Dealer N N N N N N P P P P N P P N N N N N N N N N N N Shooting Range N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M C N N N N N Smoke Shop (7) N N N N N N N N N N N N M M N M N N N N N N N N Specialty Food Store (13) N N N N N N P P P P N P P P P P N N N N N N N N Page 171 Tattoo Shop (7) N N N N N N N N N N N N M N N N N N N N N N N N Thrift Store (7) N N N N N N M M M M N M M M N M N N N N N N N N Veterinary Facility M N N N N N M M M M N P P M M M N N P P N N N N Automobile and Vehicle Uses Auto and Vehicle Sales and Rental N N N N N N N N N N M N M N N P N M M N N N N N Auto and Vehicle Sales, Autobroker N N N N N N N N N N P P P P N P P P N N N N N N Auto and Vehicle Sales, Wholesale N N N N N N N N N N P P P P N P P P P N N N N N Auto and Vehicle Storage18 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Auto Parts Sales N N N N N N N N N N N P P N N P N N P N N N N N Car Washing and Detailing N N N N N N N N N N N N M M N M N M N N N N N N Recreational Vehicle Storage N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C C N N N N Service Stations N N N N N N M M M M M M P M N M M M M N N N N N Vehicle Services, Major N N N N N N N N N N N N M N N N N N P P N N N N Vehicle Services, Minor N N N N N N N N N N M M P N N M N P P N N N N N Land Use/Zoning District VL L LM M MH H MU MU- GU MU- UCR MU- UCT OP NC GC CC SC RRC CO IP NI IE OS HR FC UC Industrial, Manufacturing, and Processing Uses Commercial (Secondary/Accessory) - Industrial N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P P P N N N N Commercial (Repurposing) - Industrial N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M C C N N N N E-Commerce Distribution Distribution/Fulfillment Center, Small(12) N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P P P N N N N Distribution/ Fulfillment Center, Large N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M M N N N N Parcel Sorting Facilities N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Parcel Hub Small (< 130,000 sq. ft.) N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Parcel Hub Large (> 130,000 sq. ft.) N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Lumber Yard N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C N N N N Maker Space/Accessory Maker Space N N N N N M N N N N N N N N N N N M P P N N N N Manufacturing, Custom(12) N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P P N N N N N Manufacturing, Green Technology N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P P N N N N Manufacturing, Light - Small(12) N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P P P N N N N Manufacturing, Light - Large(12) N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M M N N N N Microbrewery N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P P P N N N N Printing and Publishing N N N N N N N N N N N N P N N N N P P N N N N N Recycling Facility, Collection N N N N N N N N N N N P P N N N N N C C N N N N Recycling Facility, Processing N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C C N N N N Research and Development N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P P P N N N N Storage, Personal Storage Facility N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C C N N N N Storage Warehouse N N N N N N N N N N N N M N N N N N C C N N N N Wholesale, Storage, and Distribution - Light(12) N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P P P N N N N Wholesale, Storage, and Distribution - Medium (12) N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C C P N N N N Table Notes: (1) Reserved. (2) See additional regulations for home occupations in Chapter 17.92. Page 172 (3) See additional regulations for mobile homes in Chapter 17.96. (4) See additional regulations for animal keeping in Chapter 17.88. (5) Utility facilities and infrastructure involving hazardous or volatile gas and/or liquid pipeline development require approval of a Conditional Use Permit. (6) See additional regulations for adult entertainment businesses in Chapter 17.86. Adult-oriented businesses are not permitted west of Haven Avenue. (7) See additional regulations for special regulated uses in Chapter 17.102. (8) See additional regulations for drive-in and drive-through facilities in Chapter 17.90. (9) Not permitted within 300 feet of residentially zoned property. (10) See additional regulations for wind energy systems in Chapter 17.76. (11) Family Day Care Home — Large requires approval of a Large Family Day Care Permit, not a Conditional Use Permit. (12) Not permitted on any parcel that is located within, or partly within, five hundred (500) feet of the Foothill Boulevard right-of-way. (13) Permitted in Industrial Park and General Industrial zoning districts when proposed in conjunction with “Commercial (Repurposing) — Industrial”. (14) Massage establishment permit required. See additional regulations for massage establishments in chapter 5.18. (16) A short-term rental must be a single family residence in zoning districts other than VL, L, and LM. See additional regulations for short-term rentals in Chapter 8.34. (17) Maximum building gross floor area for all industrial uses is 450,000 square feet. A master plan is required for all industrial buildings larger than 450,000 square feet in gross floor area. (18) Auto and vehicle storage is permitted as an on- or off-site accessory use to any manufacturing use upon issuance of a minor use permit. The minor use permit may also permit truck storage as an accessory use to manufacturing.” 6. The City Council hereby amends Section 17.36.020 (“Development Standards for Mixed Use Zoning Districts”), including Table 17.36.020-2 (“Development Standards for Mixed Use Zoning Districts”), which shall be renumbered to Table 17.36.020-1 of Chapter 17.36 (“Development Standards by Base Zoning District”) of Article III (“Zoning Districts, Allowed Uses, and Development Standards”) of Title 17 (“Development Code”) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to read as follows: “17.36.020 Development standards for mixed use zoning districts. A. Purpose and applicability. The purpose of this section is to establish minimum development standards that are unique to development projects within the city’s Mixed Use Zoning Districts. Development standards in this section apply to all land designated on the zoning map within a Mixed Use District and are intended to be consistent with and implement the general plan. TABLE 17.36.020-2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR MIXED USE ZONING DISTRICTS Development Standard MU MU-GU MU-UCR MU-UCT Site/Lot Area (minimum) (1) n/a n/a n/a n/a Lot Width/Depth (minimum) n/a n/a n/a n/a Allowed Density (dwelling units per acre) Minimum Density n/a 24 units/acre 24 units/acre 24 units/acre Maximum Density 50 units/acre 42 units/acre 60 units/acre 100 units/acre Land Use Mix (2)(3) Project shall incorporate a minimum of two of the following types of land uses: Commercial, Office, Institutional, Residential, Live/Work Project shall incorporate a minimum of two of the following types of land uses: Commercial, Office, Institutional, Residential, Live/Work Project shall incorporate a minimum of two of the following types of land uses: Commercial, Office, Institutional, Residential, Live/Work Project shall incorporate a minimum of two of the following types of land uses: Commercial, Office, Institutional, Residential, Live/Work Setbacks (4)(5) Street Yard 50% - 75% 0 – 10 ft. 0 – 10 ft. 0 – 5 ft. Page 173 Development Standard MU MU-GU MU-UCR MU-UCT (Major/Special Boulevard) reduction of streetscape requirements (8) Street Yard (Secondary/Collector) 50% - 75% reduction of streetscape requirements (8) 0 – 10 ft. 0 – 10 ft. 0 – 5 ft. Street Yard (Local Streets) 75% - 100% reduction of streetscape requirements (8) 0 – 10 ft. 0 – 10 ft. 0 – 5 ft. Rear Yard (adjacent to residential) Match rear yard setback requirements of adjacent base district Match rear yard setback requirements of adjacent base district Match rear yard setback requirements of adjacent base district Match rear yard setback requirements of adjacent base district Rear Yard (adjacent to commercial or industrial) 0 feet (6) 0 feet 0 feet 0 feet Interior Side (adjacent to residential) Match side yard setback requirements of adjacent base district Match side yard setback requirements of adjacent base district Match side yard setback requirements of adjacent base district Match side yard setback requirements of adjacent base district Interior Side (adjacent to commercial or industrial) 5 feet 5 feet 5 feet 5 feet Distance Between Buildings Primary Buildings Minimum per Building Code requirements Minimum per Building Code requirements Minimum per Building Code requirements Minimum per Building Code requirements Accessory Buildings Minimum per Building Code requirements Minimum per Building Code requirements Minimum per Building Code requirements Minimum per Building Code requirements Building Height (maximum in feet) (7) Primary Buildings 75 feet maximum 3 stories min. – 5 stories max. 4 stories min. – 7 stories max. 12 stories max. Accessory Buildings Not to exceed primary building height Not to exceed primary building height Not to exceed primary building height Not to exceed primary building height Open Space Requirement (minimum percentage of open space per parcel or project) Landscape Area (overall net area) 10% minimum 10% minimum 10% minimum 10% minimum Open Space Requirements Minimum of 150 square feet/unit; See Section 17.36.020 (D) for additional requirements Minimum of 150 square feet/unit; See Section 17.36.020 (D) for additional requirements Minimum of 150 square feet/unit; See Section 17.36.020 (D) for additional requirements Minimum of 150 square feet/unit; See Section 17.36.020 (D) for additional requirements Page 174 Development Standard MU MU-GU MU-UCR MU-UCT Recreation Area/Facility Required per Section 17.36.010 (E) Required per Section 17.36.010 (E) Required per Section 17.36.010 (E) Required per Section 17.36.010 (E) Parking Requirement Parking Spaces See Table 17.64.050-1; NOTE: A parking study is required for all Mixed Use projects per Section 17.64.060(D) See Table 17.64.050-1; NOTE: A parking study is required for all Mixed Use projects per Section 17.64.060(D) See Table 17.64.050-1; NOTE: A parking study is required for all Mixed Use projects per Section 17.64.060(D) See Table 17.64.050-1; NOTE: A parking study is required for all Mixed Use projects per Section 17.64.060(D) Accessory Dwelling Units Allowed per Chapter 17.100 (Accessory Dwelling Units) Allowed per Chapter 17.100 (Accessory Dwelling Units) Allowed per Chapter 17.100 (Accessory Dwelling Units) Allowed per Chapter 17.100 (Accessory Dwelling Units) Table Notes: (1) On existing lots of record, parcels less than three (3) acres or less than the required minimum frontage may only be developed at the lowest end of the permitted density range. (2) Lot sizes less than one-half (½) acre are not subject to land use mix requirement. (3) The precise amount of two or more land uses in a mixed use development is determined on a case by case basis, at the discretion of the Planning Director. (4) Setbacks are measured between the structure and curb face in front yards and corner side yards. Setbacks are measured between the structure and property line in rear yards and interior side yards. (5) Shall apply to buildings, parking and landscaping. (6) Must meet minimum Building Codes. (7) All buildings within one hundred (100) feet of LM, L, or VL Districts shall not exceed twenty-five feet (25’); however, there may be areas where the maximum building height may be required to be less than the cited maximum, and shall be determined on a case by case basis. (8) For mixed use development of any type see the streetscape setbacks in Table 17.36.010-3 that apply to Attached Single-Family Residential and Multi-Family Residential. B. Open space mixed use development standards. 1. Front and/or street yard setbacks do not count towards meeting the usable open space requirements. 2. Required perimeter and parking landscape area, per section 17.56.060(N), shall not be credited toward fulfilling this open space requirement, but is counted towards the overall landscape requirement. 3. A maximum of 30 percent of the total requirement for private open space shall be counted toward required open space area. Additional private open space area will not count towards the total requirement for open space. This maximum 30 percent requirement may be modified by not more than five percent if determined to be necessary during design review. 4. Each private open space shall have a minimum width and depth of six feet. 5. Each common open space shall have at least one minimum dimension of 15 feet and the other dimensions shall be at least six feet, except for private open space (e.g., balconies or patios). a. Open space shall include both indoor/interior space and outdoor open space. b. Open space can be in the form of private open space (e.g., balconies) or common open space (e.g., pool or side or rear setback areas). Page 175 c.An indoor recreational room of up to 600 square feet may be credited toward fulfilling this open space requirement. d.A landscaped and usable utility easement may be credited toward fulfilling this open space requirement if it is properly landscaped in compliance with chapter 17.56 (Landscaping).” 7.Determination on DRC2021-00283. Based on the findings set forth in this Ordinance and the totality of the administrative record before it, the City Council hereby approves Zoning Map Amendment DRC2021-00283 as set forth in Exhibit “B,” attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Those parcels identified by APNs 20833140, 20833147, 20834115, 20835302, 20913101, 20913102, 21008141, and 21008142 are hereby removed from the Haven Avenue Overlay. The parcel identified by APN 20835503 is hereby removed from the Industrial Commercial Overlay. For reference purposes, a list of the parcels affected by Zoning Map Amendment DRC2021-00283 is also included in Exhibit “B”. 8.The City Council declares that, should any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance for any reason is held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance, and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions thereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional. 9.The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published within in the manner required by law. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS ____ DAY OF ____ 2021. CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: L. Dennis Michael, Mayor I, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the ____ day of ____ 2021, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ATTEST: City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 176 EXHIBIT A ZONING MAP AMENDMENT Page 177 ######################################################################################################################################################### ######################################################################################################################################################### ######################################################################################################################################################### ######################################################################################################################################################### ######################################################################################################################################################### ######################################################################################################################################################### ######################################################################################################################################################### ######################################################################################################################################################### ######################################################################################################################################################### ######################################################################################################################################################### ######################################################################################################################################################### ######################################################################################################################################################### ######################################################################################################################################################### ######################################################################################################################################################### ######################################################################################################################################################### ######################################################################################################################################################### ######################################################################################################################################################### ######################################################################################################################################################### ######################################################################################################################################################### ######################################################################################################################################################### ######################################################################################################################################################### ######################################################################################################################################################### ######################################################################################################################################################### ######################################################################################################################################################### ######################################################################################################################################################### ######################################################################################################################################################### ######################################################################################################################################################### ######################################################################################################################################################### ######################################################################################################################################################### ######################################################################################################################################################### ######################################################################################################################################################### ######################################################################################################################################################### ######################################################################################################################################################### ######################################################################################################################################################### ######################################################################################################################################################### ######################################################################################################################################################### ######################################################################################################################################################### XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX !!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!! XXXXXXXXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX ############## ############## ############## ############## ############## ############## ############## ############## ############## ############## ############## ############## ############## ############## ############## ############## ############## ############## ############## ############## ############## ############## ######### ######### ######### ######### ######### ######### ######### ######### ######### ######### ######### ######### ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^ ^^^^ ^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^ ^^^^^ ^^^^^ ^^^^^ ^^^^^ ^^^^^ ^^^^^ ^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D L MMM M L VL L LM VL VL LM VL LM L M L L M L L L M LM M L LM L LM LM M VL M M M M M M LM M M Chaffey College LM L 8th St Arrow Rt Foothill Bl Base Line Rd 19th St Banyan St Base Line Rd Foothill Bl Arrow Rt 4th St4th St 6th StCarnelian StMilliken AvHellman AvArchibald AvHermosa AvHaven AvRochester AvEtiwanda AvI-15Vineyard AvGrove AvEast AvI-15Etiwanda AvRochester AvMilliken AvHaven AvHermosa AvArchibald AvHellman AvHillside Rd Day Creek BlvdRoute 210 Text HR OS OS OS FC FCHR FC FC FC FC FC OS OS FC FC FC FC FC FC FC MH NC NC FC OP OS FC FC MHHMHNCNCNCOP NC NC OS MH MHMUGCNCGC NC H GC NC GCOP CSNCOPGCGCOP OS OP FC OS H NCNCNCNCOP FC OS FC OP OP OS FC IP GC FC CCFCMUCCSCCCMURMUCC U SC RCMU CC COCCCC SC CCCCCOCCCCCCSCCO MU PPL COSCCC FC MU IP IPCC FC CC CCSC SC IPCO CC OS IPIPIP CC MH CCOP RCSC SC MU MU MU IPIPCC LI IP MUOP GIIP GIMH GIGI IP IP IP OPK IP IPGCGC GC GI FC UC FC GI GC IP GC MIHI GI GI GI GI GIGI IP GI GI GI GI GI GC MIHI GC IP GI GIFCGI GI GIGI IP MIHIIP HI GIGI GIFC MH GI IPGI IP MIHIGIGIGIGIGIFCGIGIGIFCIPGIGIGIGIGIGIIPGI UC GI GI GI GI GI GI GI GI GI IP IP IP IP IP IP IP IP IP IP IP IP IP IP IP IPIP IP IP GIGIGIGI GI GI GIGI GI IP IP FC FC FC S S S GC (SP-EN)Etiwanda North Specific Plan (SP-E)Etiwanda Specific Plan (SP-EL)Empire LakesSpecific Plan (PC-TV)Terra Vista Planned Community (PC-V)Victoria Planned Community (PC-C)Caryn PlannedCommunity (PC-EH)Etiwanda HighlandsPlanned Community (SP-EHNCP)Etiwanda Heights Neighborhood & Conservation Plan ¹ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ZONING MAP The maps, data and geographic information ("Information") available by and through the City of Rancho Cucamonga are presented as a public resource of general information. The City of Rancho Cucamonga makes nor implies no warranty representation or guarantee as to the content, sequence, accuracy, completeness or timelines of any Information provided to you herein. The user should not rely upon the Information for any reason and is directed to independently verify any and all Information presented herein. The City of Rancho Cucamonga explicitly and without limitation disclaims any and all representations and warrantees, including, but not limited to, the implied warrantees of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose. The City of Rancho Cucamonga shall neither accept nor assume any liability, regardless of the causation for (i) any errors, omissions or in accuracies in any Information provided and/or (ii) any action or inaction occurring due to any persons reliance upon the information available herein. Commercial/Office Community Commercial (CC) Specialty Commercial (SC) Regional Related Commercial (RC) Commercial Office (CO) Data Provided by Department of Innovation & Technology 0 km 1 km km2 0 ft 1,000ft 2,000ft 3,000ft 4,000ft 5,000 ft 6,000ft 7,000 ft 8,000ft ft9,000 Scale 1:16,000 City Limits Office Professional (OP) Specific Plan Planned Communities Overlay District Empire Lakes Specific Plan (SP-EL) Equestrian (EOD) Haven Avenue (HAOD) Senior Housing (SHOD) Hillside (HOD) """"""" """"""" """"""" !!!!!!! !!!!!!! !!!!!!! ######## ######## ######## ######## X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Foothill Boulevard (FBOD) ^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^ Industrial Commercial (ICOD) D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D Mixed Use Mixed Use (MU) Residential Open Space Neighborhood Commercial (NC) General Commercial (GC) Caryn Planned Community (PC-C) Etiwanda North Specific Plan (SP-EN) Etiwanda Highlands Planned Community (PC-EH) Terra Vista Planned Community (PC-TV) Victoria Planned Community (PC-V) Etiwanda Specific Plan (SP-E) Etiwanda Heights Neighborhood & Conservation Specific Plan (SP) Planned Community (PC) Very Low (<2 du/ac) Low (2-4 du/ac) Low Medium (4-8 du/ac) Medium (8-14 du/ac) Medium High (14-24 du/ac) High (24-30 du/ac) Utility Corridor (UC) Flood Control (FC) Open Space (OS) Hillside Residential (HR) General Urban (GU) Urban Center (UCE) Urban Corridor (UCO) Industrial Industrial Park (IP) General Industrial (GI) Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial (MI/HI) Heavy Industrial (HI) Page 178 Page 179 ORDINANCE NO. 984 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANNED COMMUNITY AMENDMENT DRC2021-00284 TO AMEND THE TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY TO REZONE 13 PARCELS TO THE NEW URBAN CORRIDOR ZONING DISTRICT, ADOPTING AN ADDENDUM TO THE GENERAL PLAN PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF A.Recitals. 1.The City of Rancho Cucamonga is required by law to update the Housing Element of its General Plan for the planning period of October 2021 through October 2029. In connection with that requirement, the City is currently in the process of updating its Housing Element as part of the PlanRC General Plan process. The City is on track to adopt the new General Plan, including the Housing Element, in accordance with the deadlines set forth in State law. 2.Current housing law states that if a city cannot show that it has the capacity to accommodate the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) based on its existing planning and zoning framework as of October 15, 2021, the city is considered to have a “shortfall” in capacity. If a city has a shortfall, the city then must include a program in its housing element to rezone specific sites to show capacity to meet the shortfall based on new zoning standards for specific sites. The rezoning program for sites used to demonstrate capacity for the very low and low income RHNA allocations must rezone those sites to create a “by-right” process for developments that include 20 percent of the units for lower income households. 3.The City is proposing to amend its current General Plan, Development Code, Zoning Map and related special planning documents for selected parcels to ensure that enough sites are zoned to meet the RHNA requirements by October 15, 2021 and to avoid the shortfall. The City has prepared a set of amendments for this purpose, including Planned Community Amendment DRC2021-00284 as described in the title of this Ordinance (the “Amendment”). 4.The Amendment proposes to amend the Terra Vista Planned Community to rezone 13 parcels within the Urban Corridor Zoning district and to establish development standards for the Urban Corridor Zoning District. Specifically, the proposed Amendment would amend the Terra Vista Planned Community to rezone Assessor’s Parcel Numbers (APN) 107742251, 107742255, 107742298, 107742299, 107742301, 107742302, 109012117, 109012118, 109012120, 109012121, 109012122, 109012138, and 109012139 are rezoned to Mixed Use - Urban Corridor (MU-UCR). 5.Concurrent with this Amendment, the City has prepared General Plan Amendment DRC2021-00281, Municipal Code Amendment DRC2021-0028, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2021-00283, Specific Plan Amendment DRC2021-00285, and Master Plan Amendment DRC2021-00286. The collective purpose of these amendments is to ensure that enough sites within the City are zoned to meet the RHNA requirements by October 15, 2021 and to avoid any shortfall. 6.On August 11, 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the Amendment and concluded said hearing on that date. Attachment 2 Page 180 7. On September 1, 2021, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the Amendment, and all interested persons were given an opportunity to present oral and written evidence regarding the Amendment and the addendum to the General Plan Program Environmental Impact Report (SCH #2000061027), and concluded said hearing on that date. 8. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and ordained by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. Recitals. The City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. 2. Findings. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to the City Council during the above-referenced public hearing on September 1, 2021, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, the City Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The Terra Vista Planned Community amendment identified herein has been processed, including, but not limited to, public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law, including the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”). b. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) and the City’s local CEQA Guidelines, an addendum to the General Plan Program Environmental Impact Report (SCH #2000061027) has been prepared. The addendum concludes that the proposed Amendment and other amendments intended to create sufficient housing capacity do not result in any new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects beyond what was analyzed in the certified EIR. No new information has become available and no substantial changes to the circumstances under which implementation of the General Plan was being undertaken since the certification of the EIR have occurred. The proposed Amendment would not substantially increase the severity of effects relative to the environmental topics analyzed in the Certified EIR, nor would the project require new mitigation measures or alternatives. Based on this evidence and all the evidence in the record, the City Council concurs with the Planning Commission and Planning Department staff’s determination that the Amendment will not have a significant effect on the environment and an addendum is the appropriate level of environmental review under CEQA. The City Council has considered the proposed addendum attached to the staff report accompanying the Amendment, along with the General Plan Program Final EIR, and hereby adopts the addendum. c. The Amendment is consistent with the direction, goals, policies, and implementation programs of the adopted General Plan, including without limitation, the Land Use Element thereof (as amended), and will provide for development in a manner consistent with the General Plan. d. The land use and development regulations within the Amendment are comparable in breadth and depth to similar zoning regulations contained in the Development Code. e. The administration and permit processes within the Amendment are consistent with the administration and permit processes of the Development Code. f. The City Council finds that the Amendment serves the important purpose of providing sufficient opportunities for housing development within the City to meet demand at all income levels in accordance with its assigned RHNA. The City Council further finds that maintaining some local control over the planning and development process for new residential Page 181 projects is important for purposes of protecting the public health, safety, and welfare. Therefore, this Amendment is needed to ensure that the City does not have a housing shortfall as of October 15, 2021. g. The findings set forth in this Resolution reflect the independent judgment of the City Council. 3. Determination. Based on the findings set forth in this Ordinance and the totality of the administrative record before it, the City Council hereby approves Planned Community Amendment DRC2021-00284. Assessor’s Parcel Numbers (APN) 107742251, 107742255, 107742298, 107742299, 107742301, 107742302, 109012117, 109012118, 109012120, 109012121, 109012122, 109012138, and 109012139 are hereby rezoned to Mixed Use - Urban Corridor (MU- UCR) and exempt from all inconsistent requirements of the Terra Vista Planned Community. The development standards applicable to these parcels shall be the development standards set forth in Section 17.36.020 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, which reads as follows: 17.36.020 Development standards for mixed use-urban corridor zoning districts. A. Purpose and applicability. The purpose of this section is to establish minimum development standards that are unique to development projects within the city’s Mixed Use Urban Corridor Zoning District. Development standards in this section apply to all land designated on the zoning map within a Mixed Use Urban Corridor Zoning District and are intended to be consistent with and implement the general plan. TABLE 17.36.020-2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR MIXED USE ZONING DISTRICTS Development Standard MU-UCR(9) Site/Lot Area (minimum) (1) n/a Lot Width/Depth (minimum) n/a Allowed Density (dwelling units per acre) Minimum Density n/a Maximum Density 36-60 units/acre Land Use Mix (2)(3) Project shall incorporate a minimum of two of the following types of land uses: Commercial, Office, Institutional, Residential, Live/Work Setbacks (4)(5) Street Yard (Major/Special Boulevard) 0 – 10 ft. Street Yard (Secondary/Collector) 0 – 10 ft. Street Yard (Local Streets) 0 – 10 ft. Page 182 Development Standard MU-UCR(9) Rear Yard (adjacent to residential) Match rear yard setback requirements of adjacent base district Rear Yard (adjacent to commercial or industrial) 0 feet Interior Side (adjacent to residential) Match side yard setback requirements of adjacent base district Interior Side (adjacent to commercial or industrial) 5 feet Distance Between Buildings Primary Buildings Minimum per Building Code requirements Accessory Buildings Not to exceed primary building height Open Space Requirement (minimum percentage of open space per parcel or project) Landscape Area (overall net area) 10% minimum Open Space Requirements Minimum of 150 square feet/unit; See Section 17.36.020 (D) for additional requirements Recreation Area/Facility Required per Section 17.36.010 (E) Parking Requirement Parking Spaces See Table 17.64.050-1; NOTE: A parking study is required for all Mixed Use projects per Section 17.64.060(D) Page 183 Development Standard MU-UCR(9) Accessory Dwelling Units Allowed per Chapter 17.100 (Accessory Table Notes: (1) On existing lots of record, parcels less than three (3) acres or less than the required minimum frontage may only be developed at the lowest end of the permitted density range. (2) Lot sizes less than one-half (1/2) acre are not subject to land use mix requirement. (3) The precise amount of two or more land uses in a mixed use development is determined on a case by case basis, at the discretion of the Planning Director. (4) Setbacks are measured between the structure and curb face in front yards and corner side yards. Setbacks are measured between the structure and property line in rear yards and interior side yards. (5) Shall apply to buildings, parking and landscaping. (6) Must meet minimum Building Codes. (7) All buildings within one hundred (100) feet of LM, L, or VL Districts shall not exceed twenty-five feet (25’); however, there may be areas where the maximum building height may be required to be less than the cited maximum, and shall be determined on a case by case basis. (8) For mixed use development of any type see the streetscape setbacks in Table 17.36.010-3 that apply to Attached Single- Family Residential and Multi-Family Residential. (9) Permitted land uses within the Urban Corridor Zoning District are governed by the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Chapters 17.30 and 17.32. 4. In the event of any conflict between the Terra Vista Planned Community and the applicable provisions of Section 17.32.020 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, the provisions of the Municipal Code shall control. 5. The Planning Director is directed to take all actions necessary to document this Amendment in the Terra Vista Planned Community. 6. The City Council declares that, should any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance for any reason is held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance, and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions thereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional. 7. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published in the manner required by law. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS ____ DAY OF ____ 2021. CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Page 184 I, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 1st day of September 2021, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ATTEST: City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 185 ORDINANCE NO. 985 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING PLANNED COMMUNITY AMENDMENT DRC2021-00285 TO AMEND THE VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY TO REZONE SIX PARCELS WITHIN THE SPECIFIC PLAN TO THE NEW URBAN CENTER ZONING DISTRICT, ADOPTING AN ADDENDUM TO THE GENERAL PLAN PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF A.Recitals. 1.The City of Rancho Cucamonga is required by law to update the Housing Element of its General Plan for the planning period of October 2021 through October 2029. In connection with that requirement, the City is currently in the process of updating its Housing Element as part of the PlanRC General Plan process. The City is on track to adopt the new General Plan, including the Housing Element, in accordance with the deadlines set forth in State law. 2.Current housing law states that if a city cannot show that it has the capacity to accommodate the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) based on its existing planning and zoning framework as of October 15, 2021, the city is considered to have a “shortfall” in capacity. If a city has a shortfall, the city then must include a program in its housing element to rezone specific sites to show capacity to meet the shortfall based on new zoning standards for specific sites. The rezoning program for sites used to demonstrate capacity for the very low and low income RHNA allocations must rezone those sites to create a “by-right” process for developments that include 20 percent of the units for lower income households. 3.The City is proposing to amend its current General Plan, Development Code, Zoning Map and related special planning documents for selected parcels to ensure that enough sites are zoned to meet the RHNA requirements by October 15, 2021 and to avoid the shortfall. The City has prepared a set of amendments for this purpose, including Specific Plan Amendment DRC2021- 00285 as described in the title of this Ordinance (the “Amendment”). 4.The Amendment proposes to amend the Victoria Planned Community to rezone six parcels within the Specific Plan to the new Urban Center Zoning district and to establish development standards and permitted uses for the Urban Center Zoning District. Specifically, the proposed Amendment would amend the Victoria Planned Community to rezone Assessor’s Parcel Numbers (APN) 22902168, 22902169, 22902170, 22902171, 229021172, and 229021173 to Mixed Use - Urban Center (MU-UCT). 5.Concurrent with this Amendment, the City has prepared General Plan Amendment DRC 2021-00281, Municipal Code Amendment DRC2021-0028, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2021-00283, Planned Community Amendment DRC2021-00284, and Master Plan Amendment DRC2021-00286. The collective purpose of these amendments is to ensure that enough sites within the City are zoned to meet the RHNA requirements by October 15, 2021, and to avoid any shortfall. 6.On August 11, 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the Amendment and concluded said hearing on that date. Attachment 3Page186 7. On September 1, 2021, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the Amendment, and all interested persons were given an opportunity to present oral and written evidence regarding the Amendment and the addendum to the General Plan Program Environmental Impact Report (SCH #2000061027), and concluded said hearing on that date. 8. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and ordained by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. Recitals. The City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. 2. Findings. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to the City Council during the above-referenced public hearing on September 1, 2021, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, the City Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The Victoria Planned Community amendment identified herein has been processed, including, but not limited to, public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law, including the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”). b. Pursuant to the CEQA and the City’s local CEQA Guidelines, an addendum to the General Plan Program Environmental Impact Report (SCH #2000061027) has been prepared. The addendum concludes that the proposed Amendment and other amendments intended to create sufficient housing capacity do not result in any new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects beyond what was analyzed in the certified EIR. No new information has become available and no substantial changes to the circumstances under which implementation of the General Plan was being undertaken since the certification of the EIR have occurred. The proposed Amendment would not substantially increase the severity of effects relative to the environmental topics analyzed in the Certified EIR, nor would the project require new mitigation measures or alternatives. As a consequence, a. Based on this evidence and all the evidence in the record, the City Council concurs with the Planning Commission and Planning Department staff’s determination that the Amendment will not have a significant effect on the environment and an addendum is the appropriate level of environmental review under CEQA. The City Council has considered the proposed addendum attached to the staff report accompanying the Amendment, along with the General Plan Program Final EIR, and hereby adopts the addendum. c. The Amendment is consistent with the direction, goals, policies, and implementation programs of the adopted General Plan, including without limitation, the Land Use Element thereof (as amended), and will provide for development in a manner consistent with the General Plan. d. The land use and development regulations within the Amendment are comparable in breadth and depth to similar zoning regulations contained in the Development Code. The proposed Amendment will ensure that higher density, mixed use development is concentrated along major corridors within the City, similar to other zoning adopted by the City Council. e. The administration and permit processes within the Amendment are consistent with the administration and permit processes of the Development Code. Page 187 f. The City Council finds that the Amendment serves the important purpose of providing sufficient opportunities for housing development within the City to meet demand at all income levels in accordance with its assigned RHNA. The City Council further finds that maintaining some local control over the planning and development process for new residen tial projects is important for purposes of protecting the public health, safety, and welfare. Therefore, this Amendment is needed to ensure that the City does not have a housing shortfall as of October 15, 2021. g. The findings set forth in this Resolution reflect the independent judgment of the City Council. 3. Determination. Based on the findings set forth in this Ordinance and the totality of the administrative record before it, the City Council hereby approves Planned Community Amendment DRC2021-00285. Assessor’s Parcel Numbers (APN) 22902168, 22902169, 22902170, 22902171, 229021172, and 229021173 are hereby rezoned to Mixed Use - Urban Center (MU-UCT) and exempt from all inconsistent requirements of the Victoria Planned Community. The development standards applicable to these parcels shall be the development standards set forth in Section 17.36.020 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, which reads as follows: 17.36.020 Development standards for mixed use urban center zoning districts. A. Purpose and applicability. The purpose of this section is to establish minimum development standards that are unique to development projects within the city’s Mixed Use Urban Center Zoning District. Development standards in this section apply to all land designated on the zoning map within a Mixed Use Urban Center Zoning District and are intended to be consistent with and implement the general plan. TABLE 17.36.020-1 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR MIXED USE ZONING DISTRICTS Development Standard MU-UCT Site/Lot Area (minimum) (1) n/a Lot Width/Depth (minimum) n/a Allowed Density (dwelling units per acre) Minimum Density n/a Maximum Density 40-100 units/acre Land Use Mix (2)(3) Project shall incorporate a minimum of two of the following types of land uses: Commercial, Office, Institutional, Residential, Live/Work Setbacks (4)(5) Page 188 Development Standard MU-UCT Street Yard (Major/Special Boulevard) 0 – 5 ft. Street Yard (Secondary/Collector) 0 – 5 ft. Street Yard (Local Streets) 0 – 5 ft. Rear Yard (adjacent to residential) Match rear yard setback requirements of adjacent base district Rear Yard (adjacent to commercial or industrial) 0 feet Interior Side (adjacent to residential) Match side yard setback requirements of adjacent base district Interior Side (adjacent to commercial or industrial) 5 feet Distance Between Buildings Primary Buildings Minimum per Building Code requirements Accessory Buildings Minimum per Building Code requirements Building Height (maximum in feet) (7) Primary Buildings 12 stories max. Accessory Buildings Not to exceed primary building height Open Space Requirement (minimum Landscape Area (overall net area) 10% minimum Open Space Requirements Minimum of 150 square feet/unit; See Section 17.36.020 (D) for additional requirements Page 189 Development Standard MU-UCT Recreation Area/Facility Required per Section 17.36.010 (E) Parking Requirement Parking Spaces See Table 17.64.050-1; NOTE: A parking study is required for all Mixed Use projects per Section 17.64.060(D) Accessory Dwelling Units Allowed per Chapter 17.100 (Accessory Dwelling Units) Table Notes: (1) On existing lots of record, parcels less than three (3) acres or less than the required minimum frontage may only be developed at the lowest end of the permitted density range. (2) Lot sizes less than one-half (1/2) acre are not subject to land use mix requirement. (3) The precise amount of two or more land uses in a mixed use development is determined on a case by case basis, at the discretion of the Planning Director. (4) Setbacks are measured between the structure and curb face in front yards and corner side yards. Setbacks are measured between the structure and property line in rear yards and interior side yards. (5) Shall apply to buildings, parking and landscaping. (6) Must meet minimum Building Codes. (7) All buildings within one hundred (100) feet of LM, L, or VL Districts shall not exceed twenty-five feet (25’); however, there may be areas where the maximum building height may be required to be less than the cited maximum, and shall be determined on a case by case basis. (8) For mixed use development of any type see the streetscape setbacks in Table 17.36.010-3 that apply to Attached Single- Family Residential and Multi-Family Residential. (9) Permitted land uses within the Urban Corridor Zoning District are governed by the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Chapters 17.30 and 17.32. 4. In the event of any conflict between the Victoria Specific Plan and the applicable provisions of Section 17.32.020 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, the provisions of the Municipal Code shall control. 5. The Planning Director is directed to take all actions necessary to document this Amendment in the Victoria Specific Plan. 6. The City Council declares that, should any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance for any reason is held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance, and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions thereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional. Page 190 ORDINANCE NO. ____ SPA DRC2021-00285 ____, 2021 Page 6 11231-0001\2569111v4.doc 7. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published in the manner required by law. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS ____ DAY OF ____ 2021. CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: L. Dennis Michael, Mayor I, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 1st day of September 2021, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ATTEST: City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 191 DATE:September 15, 2021 TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY:Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services SUBJECT:8:00 P.M. TIME CERTAIN - PUBLIC HEARING #1 - Consideration of City Council Election District Boundaries, to Include Discussion Regarding the Redistricting Process, Review of Permissible Criteria to be Considered to Redraw City Council Election District Boundaries, and Receiving Public Input on Communities of Interest and Potential District Boundaries. (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council receive a report from staff on the redistricting process and permissible criteria to be considered to redraw district boundaries; and conduct a public hearing to receive public input on district boundaries. BACKGROUND: On November 8, 2016, the voters of Rancho Cucamonga approved Ordinance 887, providing for the election of four members of the City Council by four districts, with a Mayor elected at large, and establishing the boundaries and election order of each district. At that time, the Council districts were drawn using the 2010 Census data as was required by law. On December 17, 2020, the City Council adopted Resolution 2020-136, adding the recently annexed area of the Etiwanda Heights Neighborhood and Conservation Plan into Council District 4, pursuant to Elections Code Section 21603. Every ten years, cities with by-district election systems must use new census data to review and, if needed, redraw district lines to reflect how local populations have changed. This process, called redistricting, ensures all districts have nearly equal population. By law, the City must hold at least four (4) public hearings that enable community members to provide input on the drawing of district maps. At least one hearing must occur before the city or county draws draft maps. The fourth hearing can happen either before or after the drawing of draft maps. ANALYSIS: The City must now begin the process of redrawing City Council districts using the 2020 census data and in compliance with the FAIR MAPS Act, which was adopted by the California legislature as AB 849 and took effect January 1, 2020. Under the Act, the council shall draw and adopt boundaries that are substantially equal in Page 192 Page 2 9 6 0 population, consistent with constitutional requirements, and using the following criteria listed order of priority in accordance with Elections Code 21601(c): 1. Geographically contiguous 2. Undivided neighborhoods and “communities of interest” (socio-economic geographic areas that should be kept together) 3. Easily identifiable boundaries 4. Compact (do not bypass one group of people to get to a more distant group of people) 5. The City Council may not adopt a map for the purpose of favoring or discriminating against a political party Once the prioritized criteria are met, other traditional districting principles can be considered, such as: 1. Minimize the number of voters delayed from voting in 2022 to 2024 2. Respect voters’ choices/continuity in office 3. Future population growth The City has scheduled five (5) hearing dates for the Council Redistricting process, including this September 15 hearing. All hearings are scheduled to take place at 8:00 pm in the City Council Chambers: Wednesday, September 15, 2021 Wednesday, November 3, 2021 Wednesday, January 19, 2022 Wednesday, February 2, 2022 Wednesday, March 2, 2022 The purpose of this Public Hearing #1 is to inform the public about the districting process and to hear from the community on what factors should be taken into consideration while creating district boundaries. The City has not yet drafted maps for consideration of the Council and the public. The public is requested to provide input regarding communities of interest and other local factors that should be considered while drafting district maps. A community of interest under the relevant Elections Code for cities Section 21601(c) is “a population that shares common social or economic interests that should be included within a single district for purposes of its effective and fair representation.” In general, possible features defining community of interest might include, but are not limited to: A. School attendance areas; B. Natural dividing lines such as major roads, hills, or highways; C. Areas around parks and other neighborhood landmarks; D. Common issues, neighborhood activities, or legislative/election concerns; and E. Shared demographic characteristics, such as: Page 193 Page 3 9 6 0 (1) Similar levels of income, education, or linguistic isolation; (2) Languages spoken at home; and (3) Single-family and multi-family housing unit areas. At the hearing, National Demographics Corporation, the City’s demographic consultant assisting with the redistricting effort, will provide a presentation, and staff will discuss possible communities of interest in Rancho Cucamonga that may be considered during the redistricting process. Over the coming months, residents are encouraged to visit www.drawrc.org to follow updates on the redistricting process, review data and materials as they become available, and participate in the process by offering comments and submitting maps for consideration (mapping tools are not yet available, as final Census 2020 data is pending; tools will be released later in the Fall). The next scheduled public hearing will be held on Wednesday, November 3, 2021. FISCAL IMPACT: None COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: Conducting this public hearing is in keeping with the City Council’s mission to ensure and advance the quality of life for the community through inclusive decision making. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 – Redistricting Flyer (English) Attachment 2 – Redistricting Flyer (Spanish) Page 194 Wednesday, September 15, 2021 Public Hearing #1 - Introduction on redistricting and providing feedback on communities of interest Wednesday, November 3, 2021 Public Hearing #2 - Demographer's preliminary analysis; public mapping tool shared and community invited to submit maps Wednesday, January 19, 2022 Hearing #3 - Considering draft maps, including submittals by the public Wednesday, February 2, 2022 Hearing #4 - City Council tentatively selects map Wednesday, March 2, 2022 Hearing #5 - First reading of the ordinance for adopted map For more information and mapping tool visit www.DrawRC.org PUBLIC HEARINGS Be a voice for your RCcommUNITY!Be a voice for your RCcommUNITY! GET INVOLVED !GET INVOLVED ! Redistricting is a community effortRedistricting is a community effort All hearings held in City Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Dr. Rancho Cucamonga, CA at 8:00 p.m. Staff reports, demographer presentations and other meeting-related materials will be posted in our Agenda Center at www.DrawRC.org Language interpretation and requests for disability-related modification or accommodation, including auxiliary aids or devices, may be arranged by emailing a request to City.Clerk@CityofRC.us at least 72 hours prior to each meeting date.ATTACHMENT 1 Page 195 Miércoles, 15 de Septiembre de 2021 Audiencia pública #1 - Introducción sobre la redistribución de distritos y la retroalimentación de las comunidades de interés Miércoles, 3 de Noviembre de 2021 Audiencia pública #2 - Análisis preliminar del demógrafo; herramienta de mapeo pública compartido y comunidad invitada a enviar mapas Miércoles, 19 de Enero de 2022 Audiencia pública #3- Considerando los borradores de mapas, incluidas las presentaciones del público Miércoles, 2 de Febrero de 2022 Audiencia pública #4 - El Ayuntamiento selecciona tentativamente el mapa Miércoles, 2 de Marzo de 2022 Audiencia pública #5 - Primera lectura de la ordenanza para el mapa adoptado www.DrawRC.orgPara obtener más información y la herramienta de mapeo, visite AUDIENCIAS PÚBLICAS Sea una voz para su RCcommUNITY!Sea una voz para su RCcommUNITY! INVOLUCRARSE !INVOLUCRARSE ! La redistribución de distritos es un esfuerzo comunitarioLa redistribución de distritos es un esfuerzo comunitario Todas las audiencias celebradas en las Cámaras del Consejo de la Cuidad 10500 Civic Center Dr. Rancho Cucamonga, CA a las 8:00 p.m. Los informes del personal, las presentaciones de los demógrafos y otros materiales relacionados con las reuniones se publicarán en nuestro Centro de Agenda en www.DrawRC.org La interpretación del idioma y las solicitudes de modificaciones o adaptaciones relacionadas con la discapacidad, incluidas las ayudas o dispositivos auxiliares, pueden ser arregladas enviando una solicitud por correo electrónico a City.Clerk@CityofRC.us al menos 72 horas antes de la fecha de cada reunión.ATTACHMENT 2 Page 196 City of Rancho Cucamonga Introduction to Redistricting 2021 9/15/2021 Todd Tatum National Demographics Corporation 2 Redistricting Process 2*SB 594 would explicitly confirm maps may be adopted by resolution. Step Description Two Initial Hearings September 16 & November 3 The first hearing held prior to release of draft maps. Education and to solicit input on the communities in the Districts. The second hearing comes after the release of the California Data. Census Data Release Mid/Late August Census Bureau releases official 2020 Census population data. California Data Release Early October 2021 California Statewide Database releases California’s official ‘prisoner- adjusted’ 2020 redistricting data. Three Draft Map Hearings January 19 & February 2 & February 16 Three Public Hearings to discuss and revise the draft maps and to discuss the election sequence. Final map could be decided at Final Hearing. Map Adoption By April 17, 2022 Final map must be posted at least 7 days prior to adoption. Map adopted via ordinance.* 3 Equal Population Federal Voting Rights Act No Racial Gerrymandering Minimize voters shifted to different election years Respect voters’ choices / continuity in office Future population growth Preserving the core of existing districts 1. Federal Laws 2. California Criteria for Cities (rank ordered) 1.Geographically contiguous 2.Undivided neighborhoods and “communities of interest” (Socio-economic geographic areas that should be kept together) 3.Easily identifiable boundaries 4.Compact (Do not bypass one group of people to get to a more distant group of people) Prohibited: “Shall not favor or discriminate against a political party.” 3. Other Traditional Redistricting Principles 3 Redistricting Rules and Goals 4 Demographic Summary of Existing Districts Estimates using official 2020 demographic data and NDC’s estimated total population figures. Each of the 4 districts must contain about 43,613 people. Rancho Cucamonga -Current Districts District 1 2 3 4 Total 2020 2020 Census 40,449 44,294 45,069 44,641 174,453 Deviation from ideal -3,164 681 1,456 1,028 4,620 % Deviation -7.26%1.56%3.34%2.36%10.59% 2020 Total Pop % Hisp 35%47%34%33%37% % NH White 48%27%31%32%34% % NH Black 5%11%11%10%9% % Asian-American 9%11%20%21%16% Citizen Voting Age Pop Total 29,900 31,404 30,899 30,648 122,850 % Hisp 30%42%35%33%35% % NH White 59%35%35%38%42% % NH Black 4%13%15%12%11% % Asian/Pac.Isl.6%9%13%16%11% 2010 Total Pop 40,444 42,463 42,337 40,025 165,269 Deviation from ideal -873 1,146 1,020 -1,292 2,438 % Deviation -2.11%2.77%2.47%-3.13%5.9% Total Pop 2010 % Hisp 30%45%33%32%35% % NH White 58%34%38%41%43% % NH Black 5%10%11%12%9% % Asian-American 6%9%16%14%11% 5 Latino CVAP There is some concentration of Latinos, African- Americans, Asian-Americans, or Native Americans 6 African American CVAP 7 Asian American CVAP 8 Defining Neighborhoods 1st Question: What is your neighborhood? 2nd Question: What are its geographic boundaries? Examples of physical features defining a neighborhood boundary: Natural neighborhood dividing lines, such as highway or major roads, rivers, canals and/or hills Areas around parks or schools Other neighborhood landmarks In the absence of public testimony, planning records and other similar documents may provide definition. 8 9 Beyond Neighborhoods: Defining Communities of Interest 1st Question: What defines your community? Geographic Area, plus Shared issue or characteristic Shared social or economic interest Impacted by county policies Tell us “your community’s story” 2nd Question:Would this community benefit from being “included within a single district for purposes of its effective and fair representation”? Or would it benefit more from having multiple representatives? Definitions of Communities of Interest may not include relationships with political parties, incumbents, or political candidates. 9 10 Beyond Neighborhoods: Communities 10 Under the California Elections Code, “community of interest” has a very specific definition in the context of districting and redistricting cities and counties: A “community of interest” is a population that shares common social or economic interests that should be included within a single district for purposes of its effective and fair representation. Communities of interest do not include relationships with political parties, incumbents, or political candidates. (emphasis added) Possible Community of Interest: Historic Zip Codes Possible Community of Interest: Specific Plans and GP Communities Possible Community of Interest: Major Roads and Freeways Possible Community of Interest: Planned Communities Possible Community of Interest: Landscape Maintenance Districts (LMDs) Possible Community of Interest: Elementary School Boundaries 17 Public Mapping and Map Review Tools Different tools for different purposes Different tools for different levels of technical skill and interest Simple “review draft maps” tool Easy-to-use “Draw your neighborhood” tool Paper-and Excel-based simple “Draw a draft map” tools Whether you use the powerful online mapping tool, excel, the paper kit, or just draw on a napkin…we welcome your maps! 18Date Simple Map Drawing Tool Paper “Public Participation Kit” For those without internet access or who prefer paper Total Population Counts only –no demographic numbers 19 “Public Participation Kit” For those who know Excel and do not wish to use online tools Adds CVAP data Excel does the math Date Simple Map Drawing Tool + Excel Supplement 20 Simple Map Review Tool Online Interactive Review Map ESRI’s “ArcGIS Online” –similar to Google Maps in ease of use Used to review, analyze and compare maps, not to create them Includes overlays of “community of interest” and other data 20 21 Your own mapping software? Feel free to submit using your own mapping software: 1)A GIS Shapefile and/or a Census Block equivalency file (w/2020 Census Blocks); 2)A description of the choices and key points of your map; and, 3)Send to the jurisdiction’s listed districting/redistricting email address 22 Public Hearing & Discussion 22 What is your neighborhood and what are its boundaries? What other notable areas are in the City, and what are their boundaries? Any questions about the mapping tools? Discussion on: “neighborhoods” “communities of interest . . . that should be included within a single district for purposes of its effective and fair representation.” 23 Share Your Thoughts Website https://drawrc.org Phone (909) 774-2023 Email city.clerk@cityofrc.us 23 9/15/2021 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL – ADDITIONAL CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED FOR ITEM G1 From: Don Horvatich <valleycycles1@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2021 10:24 AM To: City Clerk <City.Clerk@cityofrc.us> Subject: Redistricting CAUTION: This email is from outside our Corporate network. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Does this community outreach merely represent the city's ability to "check that box". Too often these outreach exercises do not result in any change to that which the city had already decided. I would love to offer my opinion. Throw in my 2 cents worth. But I am a busy person. And if this is just another"patronize the public " gimmick....then I have a sock drawrr I need to organize. Regards Don Horvatich 9/15/2021 – REGULAR CITY COUNCIL - CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED FOR PUBLIC HEARING ITEM G1. From: Kim Earl <skylane075@aol.com> Sent: Tuesday, September 7, 2021 3:22 PM To: PIO Subject: Re: Rancho Cucamonga News - eReporter September 2021 CAUTION: This email is from outside our Corporate network. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. As a resident of Rancho Cucamonga, I participated in the last redistricting process. I remember several ideas were presented, but most people felt the redistricting map that was chosen was drawn up by either someone working for the city or someone on the City Council. It's been awhile, therefore, I don't remember exactly. But, I do remember residents being unhappy how the district lines were drawn. I feel it's a waste to even put pen to paper to draw up my ideas. You go with what the people in charge at the city want. Not necessarily what the residents want. -----Original Message----- From: City of Rancho Cucamonga <pio@cityofrc.us> To: Sent: Tue, Sep 7, 2021 2:06 pm Subject: Rancho Cucamonga News - eReporter September 2021 Get the Latest News SEPTEMBER 2 0 2 1 QUICK LINKS • RC Police Department • Library • Animal Care & Services • Healthy RC • Community Services • RC Fire District CITY COUNCIL REDISTRICTING #RCcommUNITY! We need your help! Every 10 years, local governments use new data from the Census to evaluate City Council district lines to reflect how local populations may have changed. State law requires cities and counties to engage communities in the redistricting process by holding public hearings and doing public outreach, including to underrepresented and non-English-speaking communities. The City of Rancho Cucamonga invites you to get involved in these efforts. Learn more at www.DrawRC.org The first City Council Redistricting Public Hearing will be held on Wednesday, September 15 at 8:00 p.m. How to participate? Share your specific thoughts, draw a map, or attend an upcoming public hearing to get involved! • Submit written testimony about the process or a specific map to city.clerk@cityofrc.us. • To view Public Hearing schedule visit www.drawrc.org/schedule/ • For information on drawing and submitting maps, visit www.drawrc.org/draw-a-map/ At the hearings, we want you to: • Share your story • Define your neighborhood or community of interest • Explain why redistricting is relevant to your community • Get the tools you need to draw a map of one council district or of all five council districts • Share your opinions of the draft maps • Talk to your neighbors and local organizations LEARN MORE 9/11 REMEMBRANCE CEREMONY DATE:September 15, 2021 TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY:Anne McIntosh, AICP, Planning Director Flavio Nunez, Management Analyst II SUBJECT:Consideration to Approve the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program Year 2020-2021 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER). (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council Approve the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program Year 2020-2021 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER), determine that the action is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15060(c)(2) of the CEQA Guidelines because it will not result in a physical change to the environment, directly or indirectly, and authorize City Manager or their designee to submit Report to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). BACKGROUND: HUD requires that the City of Rancho Cucamonga prepare and submit a Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER) to describe the City and it’s subrecipients’ progress in meeting the goals established in the Program Year 2020-2021 Action Plan. The Program Year 2020-2021 CAPER was prepared and made available per the HUD required 15-day public review and comment period, which began on August 27, 2021 and concludes with the public hearing before the City Council on September 15, 2021. ANALYSIS: On August 27, 2021, the City published a notice informing the general public that the Draft 2020- 2021 CAPER would be available for review and comment from August 27, 2021 thru September 15, 2021. The public was informed of the opportunity to provide oral and/or written comments on the CAPER. To date, no public comments have been received. Additionally, the CDBG Citizen Participation Plan requires that a public hearing be held to receive comments from interested parties regarding the CAPER. This public hearing addresses the CDBG citizen participation requirement. The 2020-2021 CDBG allocation from HUD was $1,027,974, which together with Program Income from prior year totaled $1,346,469 for this Program reporting period. The accomplishments for this year include, but are not limited to, implementation of various public service programs such as senior services, fair housing services, housing rehabilitation and homeless shelters. A more detailed explanation of these accomplishments can be found in the attached Draft 2020-2021 CAPER. All of the activities funded during the program year are listed in Table 1, including the Page 197 Page 2 9 6 6 amount of CDBG funds allocated to the activity and the amount during the program year. Table 2 provides the numeric accomplishment goal and actual accomplishments as of June 30, 2021. Table 1 – Use of CDBG funds Strategic Plan Goal / Activity Source Allocation Spent through 6/30/20 Percent Spent 1. Fair Housing Services IFHMB - Fair Housing Services CDBG $20,000 $20,000 100.0% Subtotal $20,000 $20,000 100.0% 2. Public Services RC CMO: Bringing Health Home CDBG $17,628 $17,574.31 99.5% RC CMO: CASA CDBG $11,372 $11,372 100.0% RC CSD: Food Bank CDBG $15,000 $10,142.11 67.6% RC CSD: Senior Activities CDBG $14,000 $13,622.99 97.3% RC PW: Graffiti Removal CDBG $15,000 $10,492.34 69.9% House of Ruth: Domestic Violence Services and Protection CDBG $10,000 $10,000 100.0% FSA: Senior Nutrition CDBG $15,000 $15,000 100.0% FFS: Help Desk CDBG $7,500 $7,500 100.0% FFS: 120-day Stepping Stones CDBG $7,500 $7,500 100.0% Inland Valley Hope Partners: Food Security / Family Stabilization CDBG $15,000 $15,000 100.0% YMCA: Senior Transportation CDBG $20,000 $0.00 0.0% Subtotal $148,000 $118,203.75 79.9% 3. Affordable Housing Preservation RC PD: Home Improvement Program CDBG $399,876 $145,902.65 36.5% Subtotal $399,876 $145,902.65 36.5% 4. Public Facilities and Infrastructure Improvements RC PW: Sidewalk Grinding CDBG $45,700 $25,974.74 56.8% RC ES: School Crosswalk Improvements CDBG $247,300 $0.00 0.0% RC ES: Westerly Sidewalk Improvements CDBG $240,000 $0.00 0.0% RC ES: Foothill Sidewalk Improvements CDBG $10,000 $0.00 0.0% RC ES: Pecan Ave Street Improvements CDBG $25,000 $9,865.00 39.5% RC ES: Whittram Street Improvements CDBG $25,000 $12,815.00 51.3% Subtotal $593,000 $48,654.74 8.2% 5. Planning and Administration CDBG Program Administration CDBG $185,593 $123,257.61 66.4% Subtotal $185,593 $123,257.61 66.4% Total $1,346,469 $456,018.75 33.9% Page 198 Page 3 9 6 6 Table 2 – Program Year Accomplishments by Strategic Plan Goal Strategic Plan Goal / Activity Unit of Measure Expected Actual 1. Fair Housing Services IFHMB - Fair Housing Services People 400 562 2. Public Services RC CMO: Bringing Health Home People 60 63 RC CMO: CASA People 150 68 RC CSD: Food Bank People 400 526 RC CSD: Senior Activities People 150 100 RC PW: Graffiti Removal People House of Ruth: Domestic Violence Services and Protection People 100 111 FSA: Senior Nutrition People 525 474 FFS: Help Desk People 75 182 FFS: 120-day Stepping Stones People 18 57 Inland Valley Hope Partners: Food Security / Family Stabilization People 275 164 YMCA: Senior Transportation People 120 0 3. Affordable Housing Preservation RC PD: Home Improvement Program Household Unit 25 4 4. Public Facilities and Infrastructure Improvements RC PW: Sidewalk Grinding People 16,330 16,330 RC ES: School Crosswalk Improvements People 16,330 0 RC ES: Westerly Sidewalk Improvements People 16,330 0 RC ES: Foothill Sidewalk Improvements People 16,330 0 RC ES: Pecan Ave Street Improvements People 16,330 16,330 RC ES: Whittram Street Improvements People 16,330 16,330 5. Planning and Administration CDBG Program Administration N/A N/A N/A ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Staff recommends the City Council find this action is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2) (the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment) and 15060(c)(3) (the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378) of the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, because it has no potential for resulting in physical change to Page 199 Page 4 9 6 6 the environment, directly or indirectly. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact to the City’s General Fund associated with the submission of the CAPER to HUD. The cost related to the development and submission of this report are absorbed by the administration funds set aside from the grant monies. COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: While approval of the CAPER is not a specific goal of the City Council, this action does help carry out the Council’s core values. This action allows the City to work towards promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community for all. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 – Draft 2020-2021 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER) Page 200 Draft Consolidate d Annual Performance & Evaluation Report FY2020-2021 P u b lic R e vie w & Comment September 15, 2021 Attachment 1 Page 201 City of Rancho Cucamonga i 2020-2021 CAPER This page intentionally left blank Page 202 City of Rancho Cucamonga ii 2020-2021 CAPER Table of Contents Table of Contents .................................................................................................................................... ii Version History ....................................................................................................................................... iii Evaluation of Performance ................................................................................................................... - 1 - CR-05 - Goals and Outcomes .......................................................................................................... - 1 - CR-10 - Racial and Ethnic composition of families assisted ................................................................... 8 CR-15 - Resources and Investments 91.520(a) .................................................................................... 9 CR-20 - Affordable Housing 91.520(b) ............................................................................................... 11 CR-25 - Homeless and Other Special Needs 91.220(d, e); 91.320(d, e); 91.520(c) ......................... - 14 - CR-30 - Public Housing 91.220(h); 91.320(j) .................................................................................. - 17 - CR-35 - Other Actions 91.220(j)-(k); 91.320(i)-(j) ........................................................................... - 18 - CR-40 - Monitoring 91.220 and 91.230 .......................................................................................... - 22 - CR-45 - CDBG 91.520(c) .............................................................................................................. - 24 - Tables Table 1 - Accomplishments – Program Year & Strategic Plan to Date .................................................. - 2 - Table 2 - Assistance to Racial and Ethnic Population by Source of Funds .................................................. 8 Table 3 - Resources Made Available ........................................................................................................ 9 Table 4 - Identify the geographic distribution and location of investments .................................................. 9 Table 5 - Number of Households ........................................................................................................... 11 Table 6 - Number of Households Supported........................................................................................... 11 Table 7 - Number of Households Served ................................................................................................ 13 Page 203 City of Rancho Cucamonga iii 2020-2021 CAPER Version History No. Summary of Changes 1 Published Draft for Public Comment: 8/27/21 Sent to HUD for Approval: Conducted Public Hearing: 9/15/21 Approved by HUD: Original 2020-2021 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER). Page 204 City of Rancho Cucamonga - 1 - 2020-2021 CAPER Evaluation of Performance CR-05 - Goals and Outcomes Progress the jurisdiction has made in carrying out its strategic plan and its action plan. 91.520(a) This 2020-2021 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER) is the City of Rancho Cucamonga’s report to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) describing the use of federal Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds. The CDBG program provides a wide range of eligible activities that provide decent housing, suitable living environments and expanded economic opportunities for low- and moderate-income persons. The five-year Consolidated Plan establishes priorities and goals used to guide decisions about the specific projects and activities that receive CDBG funding every year in the Annual Action Plan. The City of Rancho Cucamonga implements some projects and activities directly and awards grants or loans to non-profit or public organizations that implement programs in furtherance of the Consolidated Plan goals. This CAPER provides the City’s progress report for the first Program Year of the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan, covering the period from July 1, 2020, to June 30, 2021. For the 2020-2021 Program Year, the City received $1,027,974 of CDBG funds from HUD. When combined with program income and available prior year resources, the 2020-2021 Action Plan allocated $1,346,469 of CDBG funds to local projects. Together with other federal, state and local investments, HUD resources allowed the City and its partners to address the high priority needs identified in the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan. Table 1 provides a summary of the five-year goals, one-year gals, and one-year accomplishments for the period ending June 30, 2021, arranged by each of the Strategic Plan Goals included in the 2020-2024 Strategic Plan of the Consolidated Plan. Page 205 City of Rancho Cucamonga - 2 - 2020-2021 CAPER Comparison of the proposed versus actual outcomes for each outcome measure submitted with the consolidated plan and explain, if applicable, why progress was not made toward meeting goals and objectives. 91.520(g) Table 1 - Accomplishments – Program Year & Strategic Plan to Date Goal Category 20-21 Amount Indicator Unit of Measure 5-Year Strategic Plan 2020-2021 Program Year 1 Expected Actual Percent Complete Expected Actual Percent Complete Fair Housing Services Affordable Housing $20,000 Public service activities other than low-mod income housing benefit Other 2,000 562 28.1% 400 562 140.5% Public Services Non-Housing Community Development $148,000 Public service activities other than low-mod income housing benefit Persons assisted 5,000 1,745 34.9% 1,000 1,745 174.5% Affordable Housing Preservation Affordable Housing $399,876 Homeowner housing rehabilitated Household housing unit 100 4 4% 25 4 16% Public Facilities and Infrastructure Improvements Non-Housing Community Development $593,000 Public facility or infrastructure activities other than low-mod income housing benefit Persons assisted 25,000 16,330 65.3% 5,000 16,330 326% Page 206 City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 2020-2021 CAPER Assess how the jurisdiction’s use of funds, particularly CDBG, addresses the priorities and specific objectives identified in the plan, giving special attention to the highest priority activities identified. Each of the housing, public service, and capital improvement activities receiving CDBG funds in the City’s Action Plan address specific high priority needs identified in the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan. Table 1 on the previous page provides a summary of the City’s accomplishments and the one- and five-year goals of the 2020-2021 Action Plan and the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan, respectively, as of June 30, 2021. Based on the information in Table 1, the City and its housing and community development partners made progress towards each of the goals included in the 2020-2021 Action Plan. The 2020-2021 Action Plan addresses each of the high priority needs identified in the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan. The program accomplishments for each category are discussed below: • Fair Housing Services: Inland Fair Housing and Mediation Board provided 562 Rancho Cucamonga residents with fair housing and landlord-tenant mediation services. • Public Services: Four non-profit organizations and two City Departments provided a range of services to Rancho Cucamonga seniors, survivors of domestic violence, and low- and moderate-income families including but not limited to providing meals to 474 elderly individuals, homeless prevention services to 239 people, domestic violence shelter and counseling services for 111 Rancho Cucamonga residents, access to food bank services for 690 residents, nutritional health services to 131 people, and skilled care for 100 Rancho Cucamonga homebound seniors. • Affordable Housing Preservation: The City of Rancho Cucamonga Home Improvement Program completed 4 housing rehabilitations for low- and moderate-income homeowners to address deficient housing conditions. • Public Facilities and Infrastructure Improvements: Each of the six public facilities and infrastructure improvement projects approved in the 2020-2021 Action plan were delayed because of COVID-19 public health orders. The projects have resumed and will be completed during the 2021-2022 Program Year. More specifically the School Crosswalk Improvements and Westerly Sidewalk Improvements projects are anticipated to be completed during the first quarter of this year, with initial payments to the contractor occurring on September 1, 2021. The City will hold the retention payment until the final inspection is completed. As such, both of these activities will be marked complete in the subsequent CAPER. Each of the activities that were underway during the 2020-2021 Program Year are listed in Figure 1 on the following page, including the amount of CDBG funds allocated to the activity and the amount spent as of June 30, 2021. Figure 2 provides the numeric accomplishment goal for each activity and the level of accomplishment as of June 30, 2021. Page 207 City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 2020-2021 CAPER Figure 1 - Use of CDBG Funds Strategic Plan Goal / Activity Source Allocation Spent through 6/30/20 Percent Spent 1. Fair Housing Services IFHMB - Fair Housing Services CDBG $20,000 $20,000 100.0% Subtotal $20,000 $20,000 100.0% 2. Public Services RC CMO: Bringing Health Home CDBG $17,628 $17,574.31 99.5% RC CMO: CASA CDBG $11,372 $11,372 100.0% RC CSD: Food Bank CDBG $15,000 $10,142.11 67.6% RC CSD: Senior Activities CDBG $14,000 $13,622.99 97.3% RC PW: Graffiti Removal CDBG $15,000 $10,492.34 69.9% House of Ruth: Domestic Violence Services and Protection CDBG $10,000 $10,000 100.0% FSA: Senior Nutrition CDBG $15,000 $15,000 100.0% FFS: Help Desk CDBG $7,500 $7,500 100.0% FFS: 120-day Stepping Stones CDBG $7,500 $7,500 100.0% Inland Valley Hope Partners: Food Security / Family Stabilization CDBG $15,000 $15,000 100.0% YMCA: Senior Transportation CDBG $20,000 $0.00 0.0% Subtotal $148,000 $118,203.75 79.9% 3. Affordable Housing Preservation RC PD: Home Improvement Program CDBG $399,876 $145,902.65 36.5% Subtotal $399,876 $145,902.65 36.5% 4. Public Facilities and Infrastructure Improvements RC PW: Sidewalk Grinding CDBG $45,700 $25,974.74 56.8% RC ES: School Crosswalk Improvements CDBG $247,300 $0.00 0.0% RC ES: Westerly Sidewalk Improvements CDBG $240,000 $0.00 0.0% RC ES: Foothill Sidewalk Improvements CDBG $10,000 $0.00 0.0% RC ES: Pecan Ave Street Improvements CDBG $25,000 $9,865.00 39.5% RC ES: Whittram Street Improvements CDBG $25,000 $12,815.00 51.3% Subtotal $593,000 $48,654.74 8.2% 5. Planning and Administration CDBG Program Administration CDBG $185,593 $123,257.61 66.4% Subtotal $185,593 $123,257.61 66.4% Total $1,346,469 $456,018.75 33.9% NOTE: Some CDBG expenditures are subject to change during the first week of September as the City accrues expenses for 2020-2021. This table will be updated prior to submission to HUD. Page 208 City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 2020-2021 CAPER Figure 2 - Program Year Accomplishments by Strategic Plan Goal Strategic Plan Goal / Activity Unit of Measure Expected Actual 1. Fair Housing Services IFHMB - Fair Housing Services People 400 562 2. Public Services RC CMO: Bringing Health Home People 60 63 RC CMO: CASA People 150 68 RC CSD: Food Bank People 400 526 RC CSD: Senior Activities People 150 100 RC PW: Graffiti Removal People House of Ruth: Domestic Violence Services and Protection People 100 111 FSA: Senior Nutrition People 525 474 FFS: Help Desk People 75 182 FFS: 120-day Stepping Stones People 18 57 Inland Valley Hope Partners: Food Security / Family Stabilization People 275 164 YMCA: Senior Transportation People 120 0 3. Affordable Housing Preservation RC PD: Home Improvement Program Household Unit 25 4 4. Public Facilities and Infrastructure Improvements RC PW: Sidewalk Grinding People 16,330 16,330 RC ES: School Crosswalk Improvements People 16,330 0 RC ES: Westerly Sidewalk Improvements People 16,330 0 RC ES: Foothill Sidewalk Improvements People 16,330 0 RC ES: Pecan Ave Street Improvements People 16,330 16,330 RC ES: Whittram Street Improvements People 16,330 16,330 5. Planning and Administration CDBG Program Administration N/A N/A N/A NOTE: The actual goals figure represents the number of unduplicated persons assisted. Some received multiple or ongoing services throughout the year, such as the clientele for the help desk and food bank programs. Construction of the School Crosswalk Improvements and Westerly Sidewalk Improvements projects are anticipated to be completed during the first quarter of the 2021-2022 Program Year. Therefore, those projects will be reported as “complete” in the 2021-2022 CAPER. Page 209 City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 2020-2021 CAPER COVID-19 Allocations In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, Congress passed the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Securities (CARES) Act and it was signed into law on March 27, 2020 authorizing $2.2 trillion for a variety of measures to prevent, prepare for, and respond to the COVID-19 pandemic. Under the CARES Act, HUD provided special allocations of CDBG funds to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In total, the City received $1,591,323 of CDBG-CV funds to prevent, prepare for, and respond to the COVID-19 pandemic. CDBG-CV funds were used by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to address housing and economic development needs of Rancho Cucamonga residents. The housing component of these activities included short-term rental and utility assistance to income eligible households. The economic development components included financial assistance in the form of grants to small businesses and microenterprises. Pursuant to the CARES Act, HUD awarded formula grant allocations of CDBG-CV funds to CDBG entitlement jurisdictions in two funding rounds. Several months elapsed between funding announcements. Accordingly, it was necessary for the City to amend its 2019-2020 Action Plan three times over a one-year period to receive CARES Act funds as follows: • On August 5, 2020, the City Council approved Amendment No.1 to the 2019-2020 Action Plan to authorize the use of the first allocation of CDBG-CV funds in the amount of $604,816 for programs to address housing insecurity; • On November 18, 2020, the City Council approved Amendment No. 2 to the 2019-2020 Action Plan to authorize the use of the second allocation of CDBG-CV funds in the amount of $986,507 for programs to address economic insecurity; and • On July 16, 2021, the City completed a minor amendment to the 2019-2020 Action Plan to recalibrate the budgets of the small business and microenterprise assistance activities based on the level of demand for each of the respective programs. CDBG-CV funds must be fully spent by June 24, 2026. The City of Rancho Cucamonga made significant progress toward the expenditure goal during the 2020-2021 Program Year. Each of the CDBG-CV activities approved by the City Council are summarized in Figures 3 and 4 on the following pages. Page 210 City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 2020-2021 CAPER Figure 3 - Use of CDBG-CV Funds Strategic Plan Goal / Activity Source Allocation Spent through 6/30/20 Percent Spent 1. COVID-19 Response Emergency Housing Assistance CDBG-CV $932,823 $849,763.92 91.1% Small Business Assistance CDBG-CV $858,500 $0 0% Microenterprise Assistance CDBG $128,007 $0 0% Total $1,919,330 $849,763.92 44.3% NOTE: All activities are from the 2019-2020 CDBG-CV Action Plan amendments. The Small Business and Microenterprise activities were launched in April of 2021 and will not report accomplishments until October 10, 2021. Figure 4 - Program Year Accomplishments for COVID-19 Funds Strategic Plan Goal / Activity Unit of Measure Expected Actual 1. COVID-19 Response Emergency Housing Assistance Households 139 175 Small Business Assistance Jobs 38 0 Microenterprise Assistance Businesses 11 0 NOTE: All activities are from the 2019-2020 CDBG-CV Action Plan amendments. The Small Business and Microenterprise activities were launched in April of 2021 and will not report accomplishments until October 10, 2021. Page 211 City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 2020-2021 CAPER CR-10 - Racial and Ethnic composition of families assisted Describe the families assisted (including the racial and ethnic status of families assisted). 91.520(a) Table 2 - Assistance to Racial and Ethnic Population by Source of Funds *Note: The data in this table is supplied by HUD’s database and reports from the Inland Fair Housing and Mediation Board. The figures in this table represent the sum of the reported number of people, families, households, or housing units reported during the Program Year, without regard to the number of people in each family, household or housing unit. Narrative Table 2 provides an aggregate of race and ethnicity data for the combined number of people, families, households, or housing units served during the Program Year based on accomplishment data from all CDBG activities reported in HUD’s Integrated Disbursement and Information System (IDIS). CDBG White 820 Black or African American 208 Asian 128 American Indian or Alaskan Native 19 Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander 11 American Indian/Alaskan Native & White 7 Asian & White 1 Black or African American & White 2 Other Multi-Racial 148 Total 1,344 Hispanic 429 Non-Hispanic 915 Page 212 City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 2020-2021 CAPER CR-15 - Resources and Investments 91.520(a) Identify the resources made available Table 3 - Resources Made Available Source of Funds Resources Made Available Amount Expended During Program Year CDBG $1,346,469 $456,018.75 NOTE: This table generated by HUD’s database provides the resources made available in the 2020-2021 Action Plan and the total CDBG expenditures during the 2020-2021 Program Year. The amount expended includes prior year activities that were completed during the 2020-2021 Program Year. Narrative The 2020-2021 HUD formula grant resources allocated in the Action Plan for the implementation of projects are identified in Table 3. The total CDBG resources allocated in the 2020-2021 Action Plan includes $1,346,469 of CDBG funds. Together with other federal, state, and local investments, these resources allowed the City and its partners to address the high priority needs identified in the 2020- 2024 Consolidated Plan. Under the CARES Act, HUD provided special allocations of CDBG funds to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In total, the City received $1,591,323 of CDBG-CV funds to prevent, prepare for, and respond to the COVID-19 pandemic. Identify the geographic distribution and location of investments Table 4 - Identify the geographic distribution and location of investments Target Area Planned Percentage of Allocation Actual Percentage of Allocation Narrative Description Citywide 100% 100% All projects are citywide Narrative During the 2020-2021 Program Year, the City allocated 100 percent of its non-administrative CDBG funds to projects and activities that benefit low- and moderate-income persons throughout the City of Rancho Cucamonga. It is important to note that due to the nature of certain public service activities such as Graffiti Removal and the Farmer’s Market, those are generally limited to the eligible low- and moderate-income areas, while most other public services are available citywide. Page 213 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 2020-2021 CAPER Explain how federal funds leveraged additional resources (private, state and local funds), including a description of how matching requirements were satisfied, as well as how any publicly owned land or property located within the jurisdiction that were used to address the needs identified in the plan. To address housing and community development needs in Rancho Cucamonga, CDBG entitlement grants are used to leverage a variety of funding resources to maximize the effectiveness of available funds. The CDBG public service activities leveraged private, state, and other federal funds to deliver services for low- and moderate-income people. During the program year, the City did not identify and did not use any publicly owned land or property located within the jurisdiction to address the needs identified in the Consolidated Plan. The City does not currently own land or property that is suitable for use in addressing the needs identified in the Consolidated Plan. Additional leveraging opportunities include, but are not limited to, those listed below. Federal Resources • Continuum of Care (CoC) Program • HUD Veterans Affairs Supportive Housing (HUD-VASH) • Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS (HOPWA) State Resources • Building Equity and Growth in Neighborhoods Program (BEGIN) • Multifamily Housing Program (MHP) • CalHFA Single and Multi-Family Program Local Resources • Housing Authority of the County of San Bernardino (HACSB) • Southern California Home Financing Authority (SCHFA) Funding Private Resources • Federal Home Loan Bank Affordable Housing Program (AHP) • Private Contributions Matching Requirements The CDBG program does not require matching funds. Page 214 City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 2020-2021 CAPER CR-20 - Affordable Housing 91.520(b) Evaluation of the jurisdiction's progress in providing affordable housing, including the number and types of families served, the number of extremely low-income, low-income, moderate- income, and middle-income persons served. Table 5 - Number of Households One-Year Goal Actual Number of Homeless households to be provided affordable housing units 0 0 Number of Non-Homeless households to be provided affordable housing units 25 4 Number of Special-Needs households to be provided affordable housing units 0 0 Total 25 4 Table 6 - Number of Households Supported One-Year Goal Actual Number of households supported through Rental Assistance 0 0 Number of households supported through The Production of New Units 0 0 Number of households supported through Rehab of Existing Units 25 4 Number of households supported through Acquisition of Existing Units 0 0 Total 25 4 Discuss the difference between goals and outcomes and problems encountered in meeting these goals. As the City’s housing stock ages, a growing percentage of housing units may need rehabilitation to allow them to remain safe and habitable. The situation is of particular concern for low- and moderate- income homeowners who are generally not in a financial position to properly maintain their homes. As such, preservation of affordable housing was identified as a high priority need in the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan and Strategic Plan goals were established to provide the framework necessary to invest CDBG funds to address affordable housing needs including the rehabilitation of existing homes. Tables 5 and 6 indicate the number of households supported with affordable housing assistance through the CDBG program during the 2020-2021 Program Year. Page 215 City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 2020-2021 CAPER Affordable housing renovations are typically multi-year projects and are subject to the ability to secure funding from various sources. Often, the ability to meet the anticipated goals is dictated by various factors that can create disparities between goals and actual outcomes such as: funding availability, rising costs of raw materials, timing, and project schedules. Unexpected challenges are commonly encountered during the repair phase of the project which causes delays that impact project delivery. In addition, the City continues to address affordable housing needs via its participation in the HOME Consortium and through fair housing services to ensure equal access to housing opportunities for low- and moderate-income people. Discuss how these outcomes will impact future annual action plans. The 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan identified a high priority need to preserve the supply to affordable housing. During the 2020-2021 Program Year, the City of Rancho Cucamonga invested CDBG funds in the rehabilitation of 4 owner-occupied housing units. In future Action Plans, the City anticipates continuing to invest CDBG funds to address the rehabilitation of existing substandard housing. As community needs change the City may need to undertake additional activities to best achieve the City's ability to meet its affordable housing goals. All future Annual Action Plans will provide additional information on any on-going affordable housing activities and the City will continue to assess and determine affordable housing needs that best utilize available funding sources. Page 216 City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 2020-2021 CAPER Include the number of extremely low-income, low-income, and moderate-income persons served by each activity where information on income by family size is required to determine the eligibility of the activity. Table 7 - Number of Households Served Number of Households Served CDBG Actual Extremely Low-income 0 Low-income 2 Moderate-income 2 Total 4 Narrative Information The 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan identified a high priority need to preserve the supply of affordable owner-occupied housing. To preserve housing that is already affordable to low- and moderate- income homeowners, the City’s Home Improvement Program provided grants and loans to 4 households during the Program Year. The 4 households served included 2 low-income households and 2 moderate-income households. To address what HUD defines as “worst case housing need” the City provided funds in the 2020- 2021 Action Plan for the preservation of the physical and functional integrity of existing housing units occupied by low- and extremely low-income residents who would otherwise continue to live in substandard housing because they were not in the financial position to properly maintain their home. This includes attempts to meet the needs of persons with disabilities by making necessary improvements which aid the mobility of the elderly and physically disabled such as shower units with seats, handrails, ramping and reconstructing doorways. Addressing substandard housing conditions through housing preservation activities is a cost-effective way to invest limited resources to retain housing units that are already affordable to low- and moderate-income residents and ensure all economic segments of the community have the opportunity to live in decent housing. In addition, the City amended its 2019-2020 Action Plan to utilize CDBG-CV funds to address worst- case housing needs that resulted from the coronavirus pandemic. This investment included funds for a rental assistance program that helped 175 households, including 50 extremely low-income households, 53 low-income households and 72 moderate-income households. Page 217 City of Rancho Cucamonga - 14 - 2020-2021 CAPER CR-25 - Homeless and Other Special Needs 91.220(d, e); 91.320(d, e); 91.520(c) Evaluate the jurisdiction’s progress in meeting its specific objectives for reducing and ending homelessness through: Reaching out to homeless persons (especially unsheltered persons) and assessing their individual needs The most recent San Bernardino County Point-In-Time Homeless Count (PIT Count) conducted in 2020 revealed that on any given night in San Bernardino County, approximately 3,125 people are homeless, up from 2,607 counted in a prior effort undertaken in 2019. This includes 735 people in shelters and 2,390 people without shelter. In Rancho Cucamonga 48 people were counted who did not have shelter and 6 people counted who were sheltered, for a total of 54 homeless residents, comprising approximately 1.7 percent of San Bernardino County’s homeless population. To reach out to unsheltered homeless persons and assess their individual needs for the purpose of connecting them with available emergency shelter and transitional housing resources, the City of Rancho Cucamonga, through its Housing Services Department provided information and referrals – primarily to the San Bernardino County Continuum of Care (CoC), United Way 2-1-1, and the organizations receiving CDBG funds for homelessness prevention activities. The City had a total of 13 contacts, 10 of which were referred to the CoC. Of those, 8 were provided assistance and 2 were housed. During the 2020-2021 Program Year, the City awarded three contracts to non-profit organizations using CDBG funds totaling $25,000 to meet its specific objectives to provide public services that prevent and eliminate homelessness. • Foothill Family Shelter: Help Desk (182 residents served) • Foothill Family Shelter: 120-Day Stepping Stones (57 residents served) • House of Ruth: Domestic Violence Prevention and Protection (111 residents served) Additionally, the City’s partnership with the San Bernardino County CoC and Sheriff’s Homeless Outreach and Proactive Enforcement (HOPE) team provides intensive, field-based engagement services and support that meets clients and their families where they live. As a result, the City has been able to leverage its partnerships with the County agencies to bolster its homeless outreach. During Program Year 2019-2020, the CoC provided 1,316 assessments via its Coordinated Entry System (CES). Moreover, the HOPE team made 2,146 contacts with homeless individuals resulting in 1,124 people being assisted via its Innovative Remote Onsite Assistance Delivery (InnROADS) program. Page 218 City of Rancho Cucamonga - 15 - 2020-2021 CAPER Addressing the emergency shelter and transitional housing needs of homeless persons To address the emergency shelter and transitional housing needs of homeless persons, the City continues to support the Foothill Family Shelter programs that provide transitional housing, counseling, and case management to individuals experiencing homelessness as well as families at risk of homelessness. During the Program Year, Foothill Family Shelter served 57 unduplicated persons via its 120-Day Stepping Stones program. Additionally, the City supports the House of Ruth’s Walk-In Centers which provide emergency shelter and supportive services for survivors of domestic violence and their children who have become homeless after fleeing violent homes. During the Program Year, House of Ruth assisted 111 unduplicated persons. Helping low-income individuals and families avoid becoming homeless, especially extremely low- income individuals and families and those who are: likely to become homeless after being discharged from publicly funded institutions and systems of care (such as health care facilities, mental health facilities, foster care and other youth facilities, and corrections programs and institutions); and, receiving assistance from public or private agencies that address housing, health, social services, employment, education, or youth needs The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in significant business closures and other disruptions that put Rancho Cucamonga residents at risk of losing their housing. To address this situation that emerged more than halfway through the previous Program Year, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council approved a resolution on March 18, 2020 to address evictions and rent increases within the City. The resolution strongly discouraged landlords from evicting tenants or increasing rents during the pandemic when non-payment is a result of COVID-19 and the related mitigation efforts. To help low-income individuals and families avoid becoming homeless, the City provided $932,823 of CDBG- CV funds for short-term rental and utility assistance to prevent eviction for residents experiencing housing insecurity. As a result of these efforts, the City was able to assist 175 households, 50 of which were extremely low-income who represent the highest risk of becoming homeless. Additionally, the City supported Inland Valley Hope Partners’ Food Security and Family Stabilization program which provided 164 families with a five day food supply for all members of their household. More specifically, these services assisted 143 extremely low-income families by minimizing their food costs thereby enabling them to utilize their limited resources on other key necessities such as housing, childcare, and transportation. Inadequate discharge planning and coordination contributes to homelessness in situations where people are released from public institutions or public systems of care without having an appropriate mainstream or supportive housing option available upon discharge from an institutional setting. Public institutions such as jails, hospitals, treatment facilities, mental health facilities, youth facilities, and foster care homes are central to limiting the creation of newly homeless persons upon discharge. Page 219 City of Rancho Cucamonga - 16 - 2020-2021 CAPER In California, discharge coordination and planning is largely unregulated unless county or municipal ordinances provide rules preventing public institutions from discharging people into homelessness. One of the goals included in the San Bernardino Ten Year Strategy to End Homelessness is to formalize protocols and improve the coordination of discharge planning among key institutional systems of care and supervision. The goal calls for the CoC to close the “front door” to homelessness so that new persons do not find themselves living in the community without the social and economic support necessary to access and maintain themselves in a safe environment. The City coordinated with the CoC and other subrecipients receiving CDBG funds to ensure that its HUD- funded programs are targeted, to the greatest extent feasible, to address the discharge of persons from publicly funded institutions or systems of care so that these individuals and families have access to public services and affordable housing opportunities necessary to prevent homelessness. The City will continue to explore additional ways to prevent and address homelessness caused by discharge from public institutions. Helping homeless persons (especially chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans and their families, and unaccompanied youth) make the transition to permanent housing and independent living, including shortening the period of time that individuals and families experience homelessness, facilitating access for homeless individuals and families to affordable housing units, and preventing individuals and families who were recently homeless from becoming homeless again To address the needs of homeless families, families with children, veterans and their families, the City provided $25,000 of CDBG funds for public service programs through three contracts with two non-profit organizations. These programs help individuals and families achieve stability through a housing first approach. Each of these programs provide tailored counseling and case management services to people at risk of homelessness. Each year, Foothill Family Shelter serves approximately 50 unduplicated people through its 120-Day Stepping Stones project and 100 unduplicated persons through its Help Desk program. Similarly, House of Ruth assists approximately 100 unduplicated people through its domestic violence prevention services program. When paired with financial counseling, career coaching, and other available case management services, Rancho Cucamonga’s non-profit partners make certain that individuals and families have the tools necessary to succeed. Additionally, the City’s partnership with the San Bernardino County CoC and Sheriff’s Homeless Outreach and Proactive Enforcement (HOPE) team provides intensive, field-based engagement services and support that meets clients and their families where they live. As a result, the City has been able to leverage its partnerships with the County agencies to bolster its homeless outreach. During Program Year 2019-2020, the CoC provided 1,316 assessments via its Coordinated Entry System (CES). Moreover, the HOPE team made 2,146 contacts with homeless individuals resulting in 1,124 people being assisted via its Innovative Remote Onsite Assistance Delivery (InnROADS) program. In Rancho Cucamonga, there was a total of 13 contacts, 10 referrals, 8 individuals assisted, and 2 housed. Page 220 City of Rancho Cucamonga - 17 - 2020-2021 CAPER CR-30 - Public Housing 91.220(h); 91.320(j) Actions taken to address the needs of public housing There are no public housing developments in Rancho Cucamonga. All public housing programs consist of Housing Choice and Project-Based Housing Choice Vouchers administered by the Housing Authority of the County of San Bernardino (HACSB). The data presented below is for HACSB and the narrative questions address the needs for the entire County, with specific references to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. According to the 2020 Annual Report, the HACSB administered a total of 10,508 Housing Choice Vouchers combined to serve approximately 24,488 people throughout San Bernardino County. Of those, approximately 440 or 4.2 percent of all vouchers in San Bernardino County were utilized by low-income Rancho Cucamonga residents. HACSB monitors all units to ensure they are in adequate condition, meeting the Section 8 Housing Quality Standards. Additionally, private development with funding assistance from the Rancho Cucamonga Housing Successor Agency and tax credit financing through the California Tax Allocation Committee provided for Villa Pacifica II expansion of 60 senior apartments in May of 2019 and the Day Creek Villas of 140 senior apartments which were completed in October of 2020. Actions taken to encourage public housing residents to become more involved in management and participate in homeownership The HACSB supports resident councils and actively seeks input from Public Housing Authority (PHA) residents concerning the management and implementation of HACSB policies and procedures. The City of Rancho Cucamonga and the HACSB continue to actively promote programs such as the Family Self- Sufficiency and Homeownership Assistance Programs and actively encourage public housing residents to explore homeownership opportunities. As of December 2017, HACSB’s Homeownership program is the second largest in the state by the number of families participating in the program and is 31st nationwide among nearly 700 agencies with homeownership programs. Actions taken to provide assistance to troubled PHAs Not applicable. The HACSB is designated as a High Performing Public Housing Agency. Page 221 City of Rancho Cucamonga - 18 - 2020-2021 CAPER CR-35 - Other Actions 91.220(j)-(k); 91.320(i)-(j) Actions taken to remove or ameliorate the negative effects of public policies that serve as barriers to affordable housing such as land use controls, tax policies affecting land, zoning ordinances, building codes, fees and charges, growth limitations, and policies affecting the return on residential investment. 91.220 (j); 91.320 (i) A barrier to affordable housing is a public policy or nongovernmental condition that constrains the development or rehabilitation of affordable housing, such as land use controls, property taxes, state prevailing wage requirements, environmental protection, cost of land and availability of monetary resources. Barriers to affordable housing are distinguished from impediments to fair housing choice in the sense that barriers are lawful and impediments to fair housing choice are usually unlawful. Based on the City’s 2013-2021 Housing Element, the primary barriers to affordable housing in Rancho Cucamonga continue to be housing affordability and the lack of monetary resources necessary to develop and sustain affordable housing. The two barriers are related in the sense that demand for affordable housing exceeds the supply and insufficient resources are available to increase the supply of affordable housing to meet demand. To address housing affordability and the lack of monetary resources for affordable housing, the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan includes strategies that will invest a significant portion of CDBG funds for the rehabilitation of 100 affordable owner-occupied housing units during the five-year planning period. Although the City no longer has access to Redevelopment Housing Set-Aside funds, the City will continue to leverage its CDBG funds to attract private and other available public resources. Additionally, the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted an updated Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) ordinance in 2020 that permits the development of ADU’s in any zone where residential development is allowed with the goal of increasing ADU production. Per the City’s Development Code, an ADU is defined as “an attached or detached residential dwelling unit which provides complete independent living facilities for one or more persons. It shall include permanent provisions for living, sleeping, eating, cooking and sanitation on the same parcel as a single-family or multi-family dwelling is situated.” To date, this has resulted in 10 permits being issued, with an additional three (3) permits pending final approval, for the development of affordable housing options. Moreover, the City is in the process of updating its General Plan, which will consider the various obstacles and barriers to entry resulting from public policies as well as strategies to ameliorate those negative effects thereby increasing the supply of affordable housing and preserving existing affordable housing in the City. Actions taken to address obstacles to meeting underserved needs. 91.220(k); 91.320(j) The primary obstacles to meeting the underserved needs of low- and moderate-income people include lack of funding from federal, state and other local sources, the high cost of housing that is not affordable to low- income people, and the lack of availability of home improvement financing in the private lending industry. Page 222 City of Rancho Cucamonga - 19 - 2020-2021 CAPER To address these obstacles, the City continued to invest CDBG funds through the 2020-2021 Action Plan in projects that provide assistance to low- and moderate-income homeowners for home improvements, projects that provide public and neighborhood services to low- and moderate-income people and projects that prevent homelessness. To address underserved needs, the City allocated 100 percent of its non-administrative CDBG investments for Program Year 2020-2021 to projects and activities that benefit low- and moderate-income people. The City used its CDBG funds to leverage appropriate state, local, and private resources secured by each non-profit organization providing public services. In addition, the City will seek to leverage other sources of federal, state, and local resources to compliment CDBG funds in order to meet the underserved needs in the community. Actions taken to reduce lead-based paint hazards. 91.220(k); 91.320(j) The Residential Lead-Based Paint Hazard Reduction Act of 1992 (Title X) emphasizes prevention of childhood lead poisoning through housing-based approaches. To reduce lead-based paint hazards, the rehabilitation of housing units built prior to January 1, 1978 included a lead-based paint testing and risk assessment process. When lead-based paint was identified, the City ensured that developers and contractors incorporated safe work practices and depending on the level of assistance, abate the lead-based paint as part of the scope of work to effectively reduce lead-based paint hazards to children in accordance with federal regulations. There were no instances of lead-based paint identified during the rehabilitation of housing units under the Home Improvement Program during program year 2020-2021. Actions taken to reduce the number of poverty-level families. 91.220(k); 91.320(j) During the Program Year, the City supported the following strategies and actions to reduce the number of poverty-level families: • Supported housing preservation programs that ensure low- and moderate-income households have a safe, decent, and appropriate place to live; • Supported public services through various non-profits funded by CDBG that serve the community’s youth, seniors, families, and residents with special needs • Supported a continuum of housing and public service program to prevent and eliminate homelessness In addition to these local efforts, mainstream state and federal resources also contributed to reducing the number of individuals and families in poverty. Federal programs, such as the Earned Income Tax Credit and Head Start, provide pathways out of poverty for families who are ready to pursue employment and educational opportunities. Additionally, in California, the primary programs that assist families in poverty are CalWORKS, CalFresh (formerly food stamps) and Medi-Cal. Together, these programs provided individuals and families with employment assistance, subsidy for food, medical care, childcare and cash payments to meet basic needs such as housing, nutrition and transportation. Other services are available to assist persons suffering from substance abuse, domestic violence and mental illness. Page 223 City of Rancho Cucamonga - 20 - 2020-2021 CAPER Actions taken to develop institutional structure. 91.220(k); 91.320(j) The institutional delivery system in Rancho Cucamonga is best represented through the collaboration between local government and an outstanding set of non-profit organizations that carry out a diverse array of public service programs to enrich the lives of residents. These relationships are collaborative-each organization partnering with the next to ensure that all Rancho Cucamonga residents have the support necessary to lead fulfilling lives. Affordable housing preservation activities are carried out by the Planning Department in partnership with the City’ Critical Case Task Force and housing contractors. Guided by the Strategic Plan, public service activities are carried out by non-profit organizations and City Departments to serve low- and moderate-income residents. The Planning Department works with the Public Works and Engineering Services Departments on city-owned public facilities and infrastructure improvements to ensure their projects are delivered on time, within budget, and in compliance with all federal, state, and local regulations Through technical assistance and the annual Notice of Funding Availability process last winter, the City continued to develop and expand local institutional structure by strengthening existing partnerships and leveraging the experience of organizations that previously have not participated in locally-administered federal programs to expand the number of program offerings available to residents. As a result of these efforts, the City contracted with a new non-profit partner (Northtown Housing) to address the underserved needs in Rancho Cucamonga. Actions taken to enhance coordination between public and private housing and social service agencies. 91.220(k); 91.320(j) To enhance coordination between public and private housing and social service agencies, the City invested CDBG funds and will continue consulting with and inviting the participation of a wide variety of agencies and organizations involved in the delivery of housing and supportive services to low- and moderate-income residents in Rancho Cucamonga. Representatives of the City participate in the San Bernardino HOME Consortium. Additionally, City staff regularly participated in neighborhood meetings during the program year to coordinate the efforts of local organizations that are working in neighborhoods to address poverty through direct community engagement. Identify actions taken to overcome the effects of any impediments identified in the jurisdiction’s analysis of impediments to fair housing choice. 91.520(a) Activities implemented during the 2020-2021 Program Year followed the recommendations of the Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice that was adopted by the City Council on April 15, 2020. For the 2020- 2024 planning period, there is one (1) impediment to fair housing choice summarized below. Discrimination Against Persons with Disabilities: According to data from the City’s contracted fair housing service provider, the number of fair housing discrimination complaints on the basis of disability accounted for Page 224 City of Rancho Cucamonga - 21 - 2020-2021 CAPER 62 percent of all complaints. The next two closest discrimination complaint types include age and sex, each accounting for 10 percent of all complaints. Throughout the region, the state, and nationally, disability-related complaints are the leading basis of discrimination cited by residents, accounting for approximately two-thirds of all complaints in some jurisdictions, demonstrating a lack of understanding and sensitivity of the fair housing rights of persons with disabilities who experience difficulties when requesting reasonable accommodations or modifications. In particular, persons with cognitive disabilities experience significantly more problems with these accommodations. The Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice included the following recommendation specific to the City of Rancho Cucamonga: • Work with the City’s fair housing services provider, continue to invest in landlord and tenant counseling and mediation services, facilitate educational opportunities for landlords and tenants to provide information concerning the law as it pertains to reasonable accommodations and modifications. o For the 2020-2021 Program Year, the City contracted with the Inland Fair Housing and Mediation Board (IFHMB) to provide fair housing education and general housing services to Rancho Cucamonga residents to prevent incidences of housing discrimination. Implementation of the 2020-2024 Fair Housing Plan recommendations during the Program Year was principally undertaken by IFHMB, with the participation of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. During the program year, IFHMB assisted 156 Rancho Cucamonga residents with general housing education services throughout Rancho Cucamonga. Outreach included two (2) Fair Housing presentations to community-based organizations, resident associations, and government agencies; and one (1) workshop tailored to specific audiences in collaboration with Inland Counties Legal Services. As part of the two (2) Fair Housing Workshop held at the Rancho Cucamonga City Hall, IFHMB staff discussed the policy, practices and procedures for reasonable modifications and accommodations. Page 225 City of Rancho Cucamonga - 22 - 2020-2021 CAPER CR-40 - Monitoring 91.220 and 91.230 Describe the standards and procedures used to monitor activities carried out in furtherance of the plan and used to ensure long-term compliance with requirements of the programs involved, including minority business outreach and the comprehensive planning requirements To ensure that CDBG funds are used efficiently and in compliance with applicable regulations, the City provided technical assistance to all subrecipients at the beginning of the program year and monitored subrecipients throughout the program year. Technical Assistance To enhance compliance with federal program regulations, the City made technical assistance available to prospective applicants to review the Consolidated Plan goals, program requirements, and available resources with potential applicants. Subsequent to the approval of the Annual Action Plan, a mandatory subrecipient workshop was held in June 2020 to review program regulations in detail, to provide useful forms and resources for documenting compliance, and to review the City’s compliance procedures and requirements. Additionally, individualized technical assistance was provided on an as-needed basis during the Program Year. Activity Monitoring All activities were monitored, beginning with a detailed review upon receipt of an application to determine eligibility, conformance with a National Objective and conformance with an Action Plan goal. This review also examined the proposed use of funds, eligibility of the service area, eligibility of the intended beneficiaries and likelihood of compliance with other federal requirements such as the National Environmental Policy Act, the System for Award Management (SAM) debarment list, prevailing wage, Minority and Women Business Enterprise, Section 3, and federal acquisition and relocation regulations, as applicable. Subrecipients were required to submit an audit and other documentation to establish their capacity, and any findings noted in the audit are reviewed with the applicant. Eligible applicants were then considered for funding. The City reviewed quarterly performance reports and invoices throughout the year as part of its desk monitoring. For CDBG public service activities, an on-site monitoring will be conducted during the 2021-2022 Progrm Year as soon as it is safe to meet in person following the COVID-19 pandemic, or via teleconference, to ensure compliance. These reviews will include both a fiscal and programmatic review of the subrecipient’s activities. The reviews will determine if each subrecipient complied with the program regulations and City contract. Areas of review will include overall administration, financial systems, appropriateness of program expenditures, program delivery, client eligibility determination and documentation, reporting systems, and achievement toward achieving contractual goals. Following the monitoring visit, a written report will be provided delineating the result of the review and any findings of non-compliance and the required corrective action. Subrecipients will be given 30 days to provide the City with corrective actions taken to address any Page 226 City of Rancho Cucamonga - 23 - 2020-2021 CAPER noted findings. For CDBG capital projects, monitoring will also include compliance with regulatory agreement requirements. Citizen Participation Plan 91.105(d); 91.115(d) Describe the efforts to provide citizens with reasonable notice and an opportunity to comment on performance reports. In accordance with the City’s adopted Citizen Participation Plan, a public notice was published in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin on August 27, 2021, notifying the public of the availability of the Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report for a 15-day public review and comment period. A copy of the public notice is included in Appendix A. The draft CAPER was available from August 27, 2021, to September 15, 2021 on the City’s website. Physical copies were also available at City Hall in the Planning Department, first floor lobby. Residents were encouraged to review the CAPER and provide any written comments by mail to Flavio Nunez, Management Analyst, or via email to Flavio.Nunez@cityofrc.us. A summary of any written comments received during the public review and comment period are included in the CAPER submission to HUD as Appendix B. Page 227 City of Rancho Cucamonga - 24 - 2020-2021 CAPER CR-45 - CDBG 91.520(c) Specify the nature of, and reasons for, any changes in the jurisdiction’s program objectives and indications of how the jurisdiction would change its programs as a result of its experiences. The 2020-2021 Program Year was the first year of the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan. The City made progress toward its five-year and one-year goals for this reporting period and did not change it program objectives or the projects and activities that utilized CDBG funds. The 2020-2021 projects were successful and therefore, no changes will be made for the City’s future objectives. CDBG and CDBG-CV funded activities contributed significantly to the City’s progress toward meeting the high priority needs identified in the Consolidated Plan. As shown in Table 1 on page 2 of this document, CDBG funds are contributing to all four Strategic Plan goals including Fair Housing Services, Public Services, Affordable Housing Preservation and Public Facilities and Infrastructure Improvements. The City’s residents faced new challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic including job loss, food insecurity, housing insecurity, and disruption to normal in-person public services. City staff adapted to a nearly 100% remote work environment and continued delivering high quality services to residents throughout the duration of the stay-at-home orders. Non-profit subrecipients and City Department altered their program delivery models to promote social distancing while continuing to provide essential services to low- and moderate- income residents. There were a few activities that were not able to convert to a socially distanced delivery model, such as the Senior Transportation activity, Home Improvement Program, and various capital improvement projects that would require construction workers in close proximity to one another. The City has plans in place with each implementing agency to ensure these projects are completed during the 2021- 2022 Program Year. The addition of $1,591,323 of CDBG-CV funds fueled a significant increase in the City’s capacity to address the challenges our residents faced. HUD’s decision to more than double the size of Rancho Cucamonga’s HUD entitlement grant programs this year allowed the Planning Department to develop additional systems and integrate new partners into the service delivery model to better address the needs of low- and moderate- income residents. Page 228 APPENDIX A Citizen Participation Page 229 APPENDIX B Grantee Unique Appendices Page 230 Housing and Community Development Public Hearing Consolidated Annual Performance Evaluation Report (CAPER) Program Year: 2020/2021 September 15, 2021 WHAT IS THE CONSOLIDATED ANNUAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT (CAPER)? •The CAPER is a report required by the U.S.Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)which describes the use and accomplishments of federal Community Development Block Grant (CDBG)funds allocated to the City. •This CAPER period covers July 1,2020,to June 30,2021. •This CAPER covers the first year of the Consolidate Plan. •5-Year Consolidated Plan (ConPlan) •ConPlan 2015-2019 (Previous Plan) •ConPlan 2020-2024 (Current Plan) •Annual Action Plan (AAP) •AAPs are prepared each year of the ConPlan and outline specific activities, goals, objectives, etc., for the given program year (not cumulative) •Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER) •CAPERs are annual reports that detail use of funds and progress towards meeting goals and objectives for AAPs COMPONENTS OF REPORTING PLANS CITIZEN PARTICIPATION •On August 27, 2021, the City published a notice in the paper informing the general public that the Draft 2020-2021 CAPER would be available for review and comment thru September 15, 2021. •The CAPER was also placed on the City’s website for public access and review. •This Public Hearing also provides the public an opportunity to provide comment and feedback. •As of to date no comments have been received on the CAPER. CDBG FUNDING FOR 2020/2021 PROGRAM YEAR SOURCE OF FUNDS AMOUNT CDBG Allocation $ 1,027,974.00 Unallocated Funds 0.00 Program Income $ 318,495.00 Total Investment: $ 1,346,469.00 HIGHLIGHTS OF ACCOMPLISHMENTS FOR 2020/2021 PROGRAM YEAR •Provide fair housing services to 562 residents •Provide healthy meals to 474 seniors, •Provided food bank and nutritional services to 821 residents. •Provided help to 239 homeless or at-risk of becoming homeless individuals •Provide domestic violence services to 111 residents •Provide a variety of senior programs to 100 residents •Complete construction of Wheelchair Ramps •Complete grinding and repair of sidewalks COVID -19 ALLOCATIONS In response to the COVID-19 pandemic,the City received a special CDBG allocation to address housing and economic development needs •Emergency Rental Assistance Program Allocation –$932,823 Assisted 175 Households with rental assistance •COVID-19 Business Relief Grant Program Allocation -$986,507 Expended $220,000 and assisted 14 business to date. Program anticipates assisting a total of 49 businesses. •Approve the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG)Program Year 2020-2021 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER). •Determine that the action is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)pursuant to Section 15060(c)(2)of the CEQA Guidelines. •Authorize the City Manager or their designee to submit Report to the U.S.Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). STAFF RECOMMENDATION QUESTIONS ? DATE:September 15, 2021 TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY:Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Baldwin Ngai, Associate Engineer Chris Ellis, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT:Consideration of a Resolution to Create a Residential Permit Parking District on Estacia Street, Elmhurst Avenue, Stafford Street, Dorset Court, Effen Street, and Cambridge Avenue Between Hermosa Avenue and Ramona Avenue Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 10.50. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021-100) (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council: 1) Adopt the attached resolution to establish the “Estacia Street, et al.” residential permit parking district on Estacia Street, Elmhurst Avenue, Stafford Street, Dorset Court, Effen Street, and Cambridge Avenue between Hermosa Avenue and Ramona Avenue; and 2) Waive fees for the first issuance of permits for the proposed residential permit parking district. BACKGROUND: Located north of Foothill Boulevard and west of Hermosa Avenue, Tract 9153 began development in 1976. The tract of 68 single family homes is circulated by residential collector streets internally, which intersects with Hermosa Avenue providing access to the City’s street network. Municipal Code section 10.50.020 allows for the formation of a permit parking district if: A. Vehicles, operated by persons whose destinations are outside the proposed parking district, do or may substantially and regularly interfere with the use of the majority of available parking spaces for use of residents within the proposed permit parking district. B. The interference by such vehicles occurs at regular and significant daily or weekly intervals. C. That such vehicles being driven or parked in the area of the proposed permit parking district cause or are the source of unreasonable noise, traffic hazards, environmental pollution, parking availability for residents, or devaluation of real property in such proposed district. Page 231 Page 2 9 7 0 D. That 75% of the residents within the proposed district desire, agree or request permit parking privileges (unless established by city council action in absence of a petition). E. That no unreasonable displacement of vehicles will result into surrounding residential areas. ANALYSIS: Staff received multiple inquiries from neighborhood residents earlier this year expressing concerns of nuisance activity as well as vehicles parked in violation of the 72-hour limit per the City’s ordinance. This pattern of illegal parking had been accompanied by trash being left in the street. As an initial response, the San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department had been called upon to issue citations and remove illegally parked vehicles along the streets within the proposed permit parking district. In addition, staff organized and held a community meeting on June 3, 2021 to better understand concerns and provide information on the process to form a permit parking district. Residents reported that vehicles causing these concerns originate from outside of the immediate neighborhood and have led to a lack of available on street parking for residents and guests, blocking of driveways and mailboxes, and concern for public safety. Following the process as outlined in Municipal Code section 10.50, a representative of the neighborhood has provided a petition showing support from 51 of the 68 addresses in the neighborhood, or 75% of the residents, for the creation of a permit parking district along Estacia Street, Elmhurst Avenue, Stafford Street, Dorset Court, Effen Street, and Cambridge Avenue. Chapter 10.50.020 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code requires that the City Council make the following findings prior to adoption of a resolution creating a residential permit parking district: A. Vehicles, operated by persons whose destinations are outside the proposed parking district, do or may substantially and regularly interfere with the use of the majority of available parking spaces for use of residents within the proposed permit parking district; Vehicles parked within the proposed residential permit parking district are observed to originate from outside of the neighborhood and have regularly interfere with the use of on street parking by residents and their guests. Many of the vehicles are observed to be owned by residents outside of the immediate neighborhood. B. The interference by such vehicles occurs at regular and significant daily or weekly intervals; The interference of on street parking is occurring significantly and daily. C. That such vehicles being driven or parked in the area of the proposed permit parking district cause or are the source of unreasonable noise, traffic hazards, environmental pollution, parking availability for residents, or devaluation of real property in such proposed district; Vehicles from outside the community have created impacts including a reduction of parking available for residents, litter, and concerns for public safety leading to potential devaluation of real property. Page 232 Page 3 9 7 0 D. That 75% of the residents within the proposed district desire, agree or request permit parking privileges (unless established by city council action in absence of a petition); The petition requesting the creation of the residential permit parking district is supported by 51 out of 68 addresses in the neighborhood, which is 75% of the residents within the proposed district. E. That no unreasonable displacement of vehicles will result into surrounding residential areas; The proposed residential permit parking district consists of all contiguous streets of the neighborhood west of and connecting to Hermosa Avenue. There are commercial uses and apartments south and southeast of the proposed parking district along Foothill Boulevard whose customers and residents would not be eligible to obtain permits since they would not be part of the district. Staff recently met with the management of the nearby apartment development to seek their assistance in minimizing the need for overflow parking as well as to inform them of the potential changes to parking restrictions that would go into effect with the implementation of the proposed permit parking district. There is also a single-family neighborhood to the east of the proposed district and north of the apartments. Some residents from this neighborhood attended the community meeting in June and expressed concerns with overflow parking, however staff has not received a petition requesting a permit parking district from this neighborhood. Should the implementation of the proposed district result in displaced parking that is of concern to residents east of Hermosa Avenue, staff will assist them with processing a request for a similar parking district. F. That no alternative solution, other than the establishment of the permit parking district, is practical. Staff worked with members of the community to explore other options for parking restrictions, such as time specific restriction of parking, complete restriction of parking, and different boundaries for the proposed permit parking district among others but these options did not satisfy the needs of the neighborhood. Continued enforcement of the violations occurring on the streets within the proposed permit parking district have also proved to be costly and ineffective in discouraging further violations. It was determined that the requested residential permit parking district is the most appropriate and practical solution to address these impacts. The installation of “permit parking only” signs would allow patrolling officers to cite or tow violators at their discretion depending on circumstances including extent of violations, persistence of violations and availability of resources. Residential permit parking districts have been created and proven to be effective in other areas of the City. The proposed permit parking district is anticipated to alleviate these impacts to the neighborhood and protect the community’s quality of life. In discussions with the residents, concerns were raised about the nominal fees charged for issuance of permits as part of the residential permit parking program. These fees were initially implemented many years ago to defray some of the cost for implementation of such districts. The amount collected has not been increased since the inception of the program and covers only a small portion of the actual cost of implementation of the district and issuance of the permits. In an effort to partner with the neighborhood in seeking a solution to the problems described above Page 233 Page 4 9 7 0 related to overflow parking in the neighborhood, staff agreed to recommend a one-time fee waiver for the initial issuance of permits in this district as part of its creation. Staff will also be evaluating the program to determine how best to fund the creation and operation of future districts. FISCAL IMPACT: The fiscal impact of this action would be minor, consisting of the cost of parking passes, installation of signs, and the associated administration of the permit parking program for an additional 68 residences. City already has several permit parking districts, and this district would adopt the same policies and procedures. COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: Creation of the proposed permit parking district addresses the City Council’s vision for the City by establishing programs that maintain the high quality of life in local neighborhoods that promote a world class community. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 - Vicinity Map Attachment 2 - Resolution No. 2021-100 Page 234 ATTACHMENT 1 1 6 9 9 ESTACIA STREET, ET AL. RESIDENTIAL PERMIT PARKING DISTRICT VICINITY MAP Map not to scale HAVEN AVENUEFOOTHILL BOULEVARD CHURCH STREETHERMOSA AVENUEPage 235 Resolution No. 2021-### -Page 1 of 5 ATTACHMENT 2 RESOLUTION NO. 2021-#### A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTABLISHING THE “ESTACIA STREET, ET AL.” PERMIT PARKING DISTRICT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 10.50 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE A. Recitals 1. California Vehicle Code Section 22507 allows a general law city to establish by resolution a preferential parking program by which there is a designation of certain streets upon which preferential parking privileges are given to residents adjacent to the streets for their use and the use of their guests. 2. Chapter 10.50 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code permits the establishment of a Permit Parking District in an area in which vehicles operated by persons whose destinations are outside of the proposed Permit Parking District substantially and regularly interfere with the use of the majority of available parking spaces for use by residents. 3. Attached hereto as Exhibit A is a map of an area herein referred to as “Estacia Street, et al.” and also hereinafter referred to as the “Parking District” in which vehicles operated by persons whose destination is outside of the boundaries of the proposed district, substantially and regularly interfering with the use and availability of parking spaces in the Parking District. 4. Substantial evidence has been presented to this Council demonstrating that the persons referred to in Recital 3 above, not only occupy a majority of the parking spaces in the Parking District, but also block access to the Parking District’s residences, disrupt delivery of mail and packages, and deposit trash and litter within the Parking District, and that these activities occur at regular and significant intervals. 5. It is the purpose of this Resolution to establish the Parking District as an area within which parking shall be limited at all times to parking by residents of that Parking District, their guests, and those persons exempt from that limitation pursuant to Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 10.50.100. 6. Pursuant to Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 10.50.040, the residents of the proposed Permit Parking District’s petition shall be submitted before the City Council with the City Engineer’s Recommendation and Report which is attached hereto as Exhibit B and made a part hereof. 7. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have been satisfied. B. Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of Page 236 Resolution No. 2021-### -Page 2 of 5 1 7 0 0 the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby finds that all the facts stated in Part A of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based on substantial evidence presented to this City Council including the evidence contained in the staff report, the City Council further finds and determines as follows: A. Vehicles operated by persons whose destinations are outside of the Parking District as defined in Subsection 10.50.020(A) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code substantially and regularly interfere with the use of the majority of parking spaces for use of residents within the Parking District; B. The interference by the vehicles referred to in Paragraph 2(A) above occurs at regular and significant intervals; C. The vehicles referred to in Paragraph 2(A) above cause and are the source of unreasonable noise, traffic hazards, and environmental pollution within the Parking District; D. A petition of the Residents of the proposed Permit Parking District has been received by the City Engineer and said petition was confirmed to have more than 75% of the Residents agree to the establishment of the Permit Parking District. E. No unreasonable displacement of vehicles operated by persons whose destination is outside of the Parking District will result into surrounding residential areas; and F. No alternative solution, other than the establishment of the Permit Parking District is feasible or practical. 3. Based on the findings set forth in Paragraph 2 above, the Parking District is hereby established as a Permit Parking District pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 10.50 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code and parking therein is restricted to those residents and their guests possessing permits issued by the City Engineer or his designee and those exempt pursuant to Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 10.50.100. 4. The City Engineer’s Recommendation and Report has been submitted and the City Council accepts and approves said Recommendation and Report inclusive of Cost of Parking Permits. 5. The City Engineer is hereby instructed to immediately cause appropriate signs to be placed and posted within the Parking District indicating the parking limitations established by this Resolution and to implement and administer the permit process specified in Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Sections 10.50.070 and 10.50.080. 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. Page 237 Resolution No. 2021-### -Page 3 of 5 1 7 0 0 EXHIBIT A “Estacia Street et al.” Permit Parking District The proposed district includes the houses fronting Estacia Street, Elmhurst Avenue, Stafford Street, Dorset Court, Effen Street, and Cambridge Avenue between Hermosa Avenue and Ramona Avenue and shall restrict parking on both sides of these streets to vehicles with valid permits or exemptions as defined by the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. HAVEN AVENUEFOOTHILL BOULEVARD CHURCH STREETHERMOSA AVENUEPage 238 Residential Parking Permit Program Page 1 Updated: 7/26/2021 Resolution No. 2021-### -Page 4 of 5 PERMIT PARKING DISTRICTS PERMIT PARKING DISTRICT PROGRAM The Parking Permit District Program is governed by Section 10.50, “Permit Parking Districts” of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code and allows residents of a Permit Parking District special permits that exempt them and their guests from certain on-street parking restrictions. REQUESTING A PERMIT PARKING DISTRICT Requests for creation of a Permit Parking District may be made by submitting a petition signed by at least seventy-five percent (75%) of the residents (one vote per address) within the boundaries of the proposed district (as designated in the petition) to the Engineering Services Department. All requests will be reviewed for conformance with program requirements defined in Section 10.50, “Permit Parking Districts” of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code including the following required findings: Vehicles, operated by persons whose destinations are outside the proposed parking district, do or may substantially and regularly interfere with the use of the majority of available parking spaces for use of residents within the proposed permit parking district; The interference by commuter vehicles occurs at regular and significant daily or weekly intervals; That such vehicles being driven or parked in the area of the proposed permit parking district cause or are the source of unreasonable noise, traffic hazards, environmental pollution, parking availability for residents, or devaluation of real property in such proposed district; That 75 percent of the residents within the proposed district desire, agree or request permit parking privileges (unless established by city council action in absence of a petition); That no unreasonable displacement of commuter vehicles will result into surrounding residential areas; That no alternative solution, other than the establishment of the permit parking district, is feasible or practical. Upon completion of this review, City staff will inform applicants of their findings. Requests that meet program requirements will be forwarded to the City Council for consideration. The City Council may establish the requested Permit Parking District by adoption of a resolution. LIMITATIONS A parking permit does not exempt a vehicle from Section 10.44.130, "Storage of Vehicles upon Streets", of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. According to Section 10.44.130, a vehicle may not park in the same parking space on a public street for more than seventy-two (72) consecutive hours. As well, parking permits do not exempt a vehicle from Section 10.64.030 "Parking Restriction", of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. According to Section 10.64.030, it is unlawful for any person to park or store any house car, trailer, camp trailer, trailer coach, camper, or boat upon any public street or highway or alley within the City for longer than one hour between the hours of 2:00 AM and 6:00 AM on any day. EXHIBIT B Engineer’s Recommendations Page 239 Residential Parking Permit Program Page 2 Updated: 7/26/2021 Resolution No. 2021-### -Page 5 of 5 TYPES OF PERMITS AND PROPER DISPLAY The City currently issues a mirror-hanger style permit which shall be hung from the inside rear view mirror, visible from the front of the vehicle. Temporary guest parking permits are to be placed on the dashboard with the printed side visible from the front of the vehicle. OBTAINING PARKING PERMITS Residents living within the boundaries of an established Permit Parking District may apply for parking permits. Proof of residency less than 30 days old is required upon application for permits. A maximum of five (5) parking permits may be issued to residents of a single dwelling unit. Requests for more than five (5) parking permits per address are subject to review by the City Engineer. Parking permits may be obtained in person Monday through Thursday, 7:00 AM to 6:00 PM at City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 or by mailing a copy of your information to the Engineering Services Department at the address listed below. Residents must provide proof of residency less than 30 days old in one of the following forms (originals will be reviewed for proof of residency and returned to the requestor): Current utility bill, bank statement, credit card bill, or other bill statement that was sent through the mail on a monthly billing cycle Rental/lease agreement signed within the last 30 days Proof of property ownership, tax bill or new escrow papers EXPIRATION Parking permits are valid for a period of up to five (5) years. Parking permits currently being issued will expire on July 31, 2025. COSTS Parking Permit $10 for the first vehicle plus $2 for each additional vehicle (maximum of 5) when registered all at the same time. Replacement of lost, stolen, or damaged permits $10 each Temporary Guest Parking Permit Free The cost listed for parking permits is based on the cost of materials and staff time to manage the program and for keeping records. Costs are subject to change. TEMPORARY GUEST PARKING PERMITS Residents living within the boundaries of an established Permit Parking District may apply for Temporary Guest Parking Permits which are valid for one day. If a resident desire more than fifty (50) Temporary Guest Parking Permits for a special event, the resident may apply for a special event permit that will temporarily suspend the need for visitors to display a parking permit. Staff may require that the resident fulfill special conditions, such as notifying neighbors of the special event, and covering the permit parking district regulation signs. FINE FOR PARKING VIOLATIONS Fine per violation $50 (Fines are subject to change) PROGRAM CONTACT INFORMATION City of Rancho Cucamonga / Engineering Services Department P. O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 477-2700 Page 240 “Estacia Street et al.” Permit Parking District Elmhurst AveHermosa AveCambridge AveElmhurst AveCambridge AveHermosa Ave Existing Condition •Regular/Frequent Occurrences of: •Trash/Environmental Pollution •Unreasonable Noise •Interference of Parking (e.g.,Vehicles parking in front of Trash cans, vehicles blocking driveway access, Etc.) Process of establishing a Parking District •Resident(s) in neighborhood contact the City and request to establish parking District. •Staff reviews the request to ensure conformance with the program requirements defined in Section 10.50, “Permit Parking Districts” of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. •Staff designates the boundary of the proposed parking district. •A designated resident leads the effort in collecting signatures from residents (one vote per address) within the proposed district. Municipal Code Section 10.50.020 Designation of permit parking districts A.Drivers who don’t live in the neighborhood are regularly occupying on-street parking in the neighborhood. B.Traffic hazards, environmental pollution, or devaluation of real property. C.Support from 75% of the residents within the proposed district (a signed petition) D.That no unreasonable displacement of vehicles will result into surrounding residential areas E.No practical alternative solutions Proposed Parking District ARTE Apartments Support (59/68) = 87% Does not support (5/68) Proposed Signage Parking Permits •City will cover the initial cost for five (5) resident parking permits (exp. July 31, 2025) •These five (5) permits will be directly mailed to all addresses within the newly formed district. •Permits can be replaced if lost •Costs •$10 –First permit •$2 –Each additional permit •Permits are available for guests What we've heard... •Requests to solve the overflow parking issue •Based on the petition circulated, the neighborhood believes the permit parking district is a solution However, a few alternative perspectives have been presented. Response •Parking Analysis for the development of Arte •Two separate studies showed a surplus •CUP Revocation •There is no CUP associated with Arte •RCMC 8.23.050 •“Maintenance of Property Causing Public Nuisance” •This section does not apply to overflow parking. Response cont. •Arte Parking Management •Last inspection completed in February 2021 revealing no violations. Upcoming inspection scheduled. •Towing Impacts •Towing has been implemented in similar districts •Completed on a call for service basis and is prioritized with other PD activities •Can take time but is not something we expect to be required on a daily basis. Response cont. •Displaced Parking •Possible that cars could be displaced to the neighborhood north of Arte; permit parking district formation is also an option in this area •Staff is working with Arte on a plan to better manage parking. •Permit Issuance Process •Initial fees will be waived and permits mailed directly to all properties in the district. •Staff coordinates with residents to fulfill any guest/party/additional permit needs. Response cont. •Property Values •Analysis shows average of 6% increase over the last few years. •Ability to Sell •We have similar districts in many different areas. •None have been requested to be removed. Arte Apartments Analyzed Neighborhood 166 Homes Recommendation Staff recommends the City Council: 1.Adopt Resolution No. 2021-100 to establish the “Estacia Street, et al.” residential permit parking district on Estacia Street, Elmhurst Avenue, Stafford Street, Dorset Court, Effen Street and Cambridge Avenue between Hermosa Avenue and Ramona Avenue; and 2.Waive fees for the first issuance of permits for the proposed residential permit parking district. DATE:September 15, 2021 TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY:Fabian Villenas, Principal Management Analyst Deborah Allen, Management Analyst I SUBJECT:Consideration of a Resolution Proclaiming October 6, 2021, as California Clean Air Day. (RESOLUTION NO 2021-098) (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2021-098, proclaiming October 6, 2021, as California Clean Air Day. BACKGROUND: The Coalition for Clean Air launched Clean Air Day to unite people to action to improve community health and help develop habits to achieve clean air. Now in its fourth year, California Clean Air Day is built on the idea that shared experiences unite people to action to improve our community health. Joining together for a unified day of action creates new habits to clear the air for all members of California’s diverse communities. California has some of the most polluted regions in the United States. This is especially true in the South Coast Air Basin, which includes Rancho Cucamonga, as it often ranks as having the worst air quality in the nation. To combat this fact, it’s critical that state and local government do our part to share information and actions to make a positive difference. ANALYSIS: The California Clean Air Day goal is to spread the message throughout California about air pollution and how it directly impacts all Californians’ health. This year, California Clean Air Day takes place on October 6, 2021. This day of action focuses on the improvement of community health and the impacts of air pollution upon Californians, hospitals and healthcare organizations, schools and school districts, businesses and workplaces, communities, non-profits, and cities. The Coalition for Clean Air has major sponsors and supporters including Edison International, SoCalGas, Los Angeles World Airports (LAX), and millions of Californians pledging to take at least one action to “clear the air”. California Clean Air Day is centered around a “clean air pledge” that individuals and organizations make to do at least one action that promotes clean air. This pledge lists simple actions such as changing an air filter, bicycling to the store, or planting a tree. By taking a pledge, it can increase the amount of collective positive actions taken by the community. The City of Rancho Cucamonga is excited to be doing our part by submitting our organizational Clean Air Day Pledge to help improve our air quality and awareness in the Inland Empire. These efforts align with the Healthy RC Initiative that was launched in 2008 as we strive for a clean environment and aim to improve the quality of life for our residents. To support our Clean Air Day Page 241 Page 2 9 6 8 pledge, city staff will be encouraged to walk or bicycle to work on October 6, 2021. For community outreach, social media posts will be placed on Facebook and Instagram Stories to encourage businesses and residents to participate. These collective efforts should contribute to additional Clean Air Day pledges and improve the air quality in the Inland Empire. FISCAL IMPACT: None. COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: Participation in the organizational Clean Air Day supports efforts to improve the quality of life of our residents. It also provides an opportunity for the community to take part in positive actions to improve air quality. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 – Clean Air Day Resolution No. 2021-098 Page 242 ATTACHMENT 1 1 6 9 1 RESOLUTION 2021-098 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING OCTOBER 6, 2021 AS CALIFORNIA CLEAN AIR DAY WHEREAS, Clean Air Day is now in its fourth year and is built on the idea of shared experiences unite people to action with the goal of improving community health, inspiring clean air efforts, environmental awareness and encouraging the conservation, protection, and appreciation of our natural resources; and WHEREAS, California has some of the most polluted regions in the United States; and WHEREAS, cities within the San Bernardino County face disproportionate, negative health impacts due to low air quality, and WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga recognizes the importance of encouraging a healthy and environmentally sustainable lifestyle for those who live, work, learn, visit, and play in the community; and WHEREAS, it is vital that we protect the health and well-being of our residents, visitors, and workforce; and WHEREAS, emissions from vehicles, industry, and even household sources affect the natural environment, air quality and well-being of residents and visitors of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and WHEREAS, air pollution contributes to higher rates of cancer and heart and lung diseases; and WHEREAS, individual actions such walking or biking to work and school, carpooling, and conserving energy can directly improve air quality in our region; and WHEREAS, education about air quality can raise community awareness, encourage our community to develop better habits, and improve our community health; and WHEREAS, Californians will be joining together across the state to clear the air on October 6, 2021. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City of Rancho Cucamonga, that October 6, 2021, be declared “Clean Air Day” within its jurisdiction. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that we encourage all residents, businesses, employees, and community members to participate in Clean Air Day and help clear the air for all Californians. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of September, 2021 Page 243 Consideration of a Resolution Proclaiming October 6, 2021, as California Clean Air Day •Improve community health and air quality •Join others for a unified day of action •Combat the worst air quality in the nation •Commit as a participating organization The City Takes the Pledge •Share on social media and request businesses and residents to make a pledge for clean air. •Provide incentives to increase participation. •Advertise our efforts through billboards and newsletters. •Reach out to trusted partners to join us in our effort. •Coordinate information to be disseminated at upcoming events. Encourage the Community to Take the Pledge •Post flyers and information throughout city facilities. •Create a video showcasing our collective efforts. •Connect with statewide Ride Share week efforts. •Plan an event to encourage departmental participation. •Encourage employees to bicycle or walk to work on October 6, 2021. Encourage Employees to Take the Pledge DATE:September 15, 2021 TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY:Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services SUBJECT:Consideration of Santa Tour Activities for 2021. (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council consider possible Santa Tour activities for 2021, and provide staff with appropriate direction. BACKGROUND: In previous years, the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District and the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department would hold a series of Ho-Ho Parades each year. For several nights during the holiday season, a parade of public safety vehicles would accompany Santa through neighborhoods of the City, throwing candy and ending at a location where Santa would greet children and hand out candy canes. The Ho-Ho-Parade activities were discontinued approximately ten (10) years ago during the last recession. During the development of the FY 2020-21 budget process, Council members asked for information concerning the possibility of restoring a Santa activity. In September of 2020, Council discussed the matter and determined to not pursue the program for the year, given the COVID situation and staffing constraints. At the August 18, 2021 meeting of the City Council, Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy requested that the matter be brought back for Council discussion in September. ANALYSIS: At this time, both the Fire District and RCPD are challenged by significant staffing shortages. Within the Fire District, staff have been pulled into strike team assignments for the fire season that began months earlier than usual; it is likely the season might extend into the November/December timeframe, given the ongoing drought conditions and anticipated lighter- than-average projected rainfall. Approximately 10-20 fire sworn retirements are also anticipated to occur leading up to the end of the calendar year, which is equivalent to 10-20% of the sworn work force. In the RCPD, there are similar staffing challenges with ongoing vacancies and retirements. The Traffic Bureau has one motor officer remaining, with the other staff using traditional patrol vehicles. Additionally, the Police and Fire teams will be challenged to manage the annual Thoroughbred Holiday Lights, which is not a city-sponsored event but does utilize city resources, including a heavy overtime presence especially on the weekends leading up to Christmas. Page 244 Page 2 9 6 4 Given these limitations, a tentative plan has been developed for a Santa Tour to replace the Ho- Ho Parade concept. The concept has been developed in recognition of the staffing constraints discussed above, and in light of updated risk management practices and the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. The 4-5 night event would take place mid-week, and would not include a parade. Instead, Community Services Department staff would facilitate 2-3 community block parties in fixed locations for each of the planned nights. Each night the block parties would rotate to a different Council District to ensure geographic equity throughout the City. CSD at each site would provide staffing, candy, an ornament craft, a photo back drop, and facilitate Santa’s arrival and departure. FISCAL IMPACT: The approximate cost for a five night event, with three block parties per night, would be $15,000 - $20,000. These costs include part-time staffing and supplies for the events, and do not include the soft costs for Community Services and Community Affairs full time staff. The event would take place without accompanying Fire and Police staffing as was done in the past, given the realities of COVID-19, Wildfire Season, Thoroughbred Lights and the use of public funds. Funds are not included in the FY 2021-22 budget for a Santa Tour. If the Council determines to move forward with the tour, a budget appropriation from the General Fund would be required. COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: Should the Council so desire, approval of this item is in keeping with the Council’s core value of building and preserving a family-oriented atmosphere. ATTACHMENTS: None Page 245 Consideration of Santa Tour Santa’s on vacation, but the holidays are coming… Background •Ho-Ho Parades in prior years •Public safety prominent in parade •Discontinued during last recession (around 2012) •Reconsidered in 2020 •Reconsideration requested at August 18, 2021 meeting Challenges •Fire District staffing –End of year retirements, anticipating vacancies and promotions –Impacts/Demand of Fire Academy in progress in December –Extended fire season possible (NEW since 2012) •Police Department staffing –Thoroughbred Holiday Lights staffing demands (NEW since 2014- 2015) –Vacancies and service demands –Shift in Traffic Bureau operations from motors to traditional patrol vehicles (NEW since 2018-2019) Santa Tour Concept for Discussion •4-5 nights in December, mid-week, weather permitting •No parade element •2-3 block parties per night in fixed locations –Facilitated by Community Services staff –Rotated around the city for geographic equity –CSD to staff parties, provide a craft activity, candy, a photo backdrop, and facilitate Santa’s arrival and departure –COVID considerations in place Fiscal Impact •$15,000 -$20,000 cost •Costs for part time staff, supplies •Costs managed by not including public safety resources •Budget appropriation would be required •Decision required in September to allow for planning and resource allocation in December Consideration of Santa Tour