Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2022/01/19 - Regular Meeting Agenda PacketMayor L. Dennis Michael Mayor Pro Tem Lynne B. Kennedy Members of the City Council: Ryan A. Hutchison Kristine D. Scott Sam Spagnolo AMENDED AGENDA (ITEMS F3 AND F4 UPDATED TO REFLECT APN’s 1/14/2022 1:00PM) CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REGULAR MEETING AGENDA January 19, 2022 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730  FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARD – CITY COUNCIL HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY­ SUCCESSOR AGENCY – PUBLIC FINANCE AUTHORITY CLOSED SESSION TRI­COMMUNITIES ROOM 4:30 P.M. REGULAR MEETINGS        COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 P.M. The City Council meets regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive.  It Is the Intent to conclude the meeting by 10:00 p.m. unless extended by the concurrence of the City Council.  Agendas, minutes, and recordings of meetings can be found at www.cityofrc.us or by contacting the City Clerk's Office at 909­774­2023. Live Broadcast available on Channel 3 (RCTV­3). In accordance with AB 361, and to ensure the health and safety of our residents by limiting contact that could spread the COVID–19 virus, members of the public have the option to participate in this City Council/Fire District meeting via a teleconference. Members of the public may also attend the meeting in person.  Those wishing to speak during public communication may call at the start of the meeting by dialing (909)774­2751, if speaking on a Public Hearing item, please dial in when the Public Hearing is being heard at (909)774­2751 to be added to the queue for public comment. Calls will be answered in the order received.  Members of the public are encouraged to watch from the safety of their homes by Live Streaming on the City's website at https://www.cityofrc.us/your­ government/city­council­agendas or Local Cable: RCTV­3 Programming.  The City of Rancho Cucamonga thanks you in advance for taking all precautions to prevent spreading the COVID­19 virus. CLOSED SESSION – 4:30 P.M.   TRI­COMMUNITIES ROOM  ROLL CALL: Mayor Michael                         Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy                         Council Members Hutchison, Scott, and Spagnolo  A. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) C. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS D. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION D1.CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR ROBERT NEIUBER, HUMAN RESOURCES DIRECTOR PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54954.2 REGARDING LABOR NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY EMPLOYEES’ ASSOCIATION (RCCEA), TEAMSTERS LOCAL 1932, RANCHO CUCAMONGA MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT GROUP – (CITY/FIRE) D2.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL ANTICIPATED LITIGATION: INITIATION OF LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9: 2 CASES – (CITY) D3.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL ANTICIPATED LITIGATION: INITIATION OF LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9: 1 CASE – (FIRE)  D4.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH(1) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: PEPE’S INC. V. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, CASE NO. 5:20CV02506JGBSP – (CITY) D5.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH(1) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: HIMNEL USA, INC. d/b/a ST. MARY'S MONTESSORI SCHOOL AND GLOBAL PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLC VS. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, SBSC CASE NO.: CIVDS 2014554. – (CITY) D6.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (1) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V. DR LANDMARK, INC.; POWER MEDIC TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; HOFER PROPERTIES, LLC; AND DOES 1 THROUGH 5 INCLUSIVE, SBSC CASE NO.: CIVDS 1904713 – (CITY) D7.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE TERMINUS OF SMOKESTONE STREET, EAST OF TORREY PINE COURT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 91739, IDENTIFIED AS COUNTY ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBER 0228­044­24, NEGOTIATING PARTIES JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND CHAO PING YANG; REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS. – (CITY) D8.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8949 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229­162­22; NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND OVERLAND, PACIFIC AND CUTLER, REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON, OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – (CITY) D9.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8783 ETIWANDA AVENUE/12949 WHITTRAM AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229­162­14; NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND OVERLAND, PACIFIC, AND CUTLER, REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND KULAR TRUCK LINE, INC., OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – (CITY) D10.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 9333 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229­162­23; NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND OVERLAND, PACIFIC AND CUTLER, REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON, OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – (CITY) D11.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8768 AND 8822 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229­131­15, ­16, AND ­26; NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND KELLY DEWITT, OVERLAND, PACIFIC, AND CUTLER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND SCG/DP ETIWANDA LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – (CITY) D12.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8996 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229­283­79; NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND KELLY DEWITT, OVERLAND, PACIFIC AND CUTLER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND BTC III RANCHO CUCAMONGA LOGISTICS CENTER LP, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – (CITY) D13.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8821 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229­162­15; NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND KELLY DEWITT, OVERLAND, PACIFIC AND CUTLER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND WILLIAM A. JONES AND JOAN F. JONES, TRUSTEES OF THE JONES FAMILY TRUST OF 2010, AS TO AN UNDIVIDED ONETHIRD (1/3) INTEREST, AND JAMES ROY GARNESS AND RHONDA ANN GARNESS, UNDIVIDED ONETHIRD (1/3) INTEREST, AND JAMES ROY GARNESS AND RHONDA ANN GARNESS, TRUSTEES OF THE GARNESS FAMILY TRUST DATED JUNE 28, 2012, AS TO AN UNDIVIDED ONETHIRD (1/3) INTEREST, AND JOHN S. CLEMONS AND PATRICIA R. CLEMONS, TRUSTEES OF THE CLEMONS REVOCABLE TRUST DATED DECEMBER 4, 2014, AS TO AN UNDIVIDED ONETHIRD (1/3) INTEREST, AS TENANTS IN COMMON, OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – (CITY) D14.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 12521 ARROW ROUTE AND 8688 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229­131­30 AND ­31; NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND KELLY DEWITT, OVERLAND, PACIFIC, AND CUTLER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND GOODMAN RANCHO SPE LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – (CITY) D15.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8889 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229­291­17 and ­18; NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND KELLY DEWITT, OVERLAND, PACIFIC, AND CUTLER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND LIGHTNING P.M. LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – (CITY) D16.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8685 TO 8821 ETIWANDA AVENUE AND 12928 TO 12974 WHITTRAM AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229­151­15 AND ­28, 0229­161­01, ­02, ­03, ­04, 05, ­19, AND ­20; NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND KELLY DEWITT, OVERLAND, PACIFIC, AND CUTLER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND COLOMBERO FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – (CITY) D17.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8939 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229­291­55; NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND KELLY DEWITT, OVERLAND, PACIFIC, AND CUTLER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND BCORE IE WEST OWNER LLC, OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – (CITY) D18.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 12467 BASE LINE ROAD IDENTIFIED AS PARCEL NUMBERS 1090331030000, 1090331040000, 1089581040000; NEGOTIATING PARTIES JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND JOSEPH FILIPPI, JOSEPH FILIPPI WINERY AND VINEYARDS; REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS. – (CITY) E. RECESS – Closed Session to Recess to the Regular City Council Meeting at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers at City Hall, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. REGULAR MEETING – 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL:Mayor Michael Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy Council Members Hutchison, Scott, and Spagnolo A. AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDA B. ANNOUNCEMENT / PRESENTATIONS C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS Members of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, and Public Finance Authority. This is the time and place for the general public to address the Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Council on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Mayor, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Fire Board, Agencies, Successor Agency, Authority Board, or City Council not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of the business portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topic contained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for these business items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of the agenda commences. Any other public communications which have not concluded during this one hour period may resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed. CONSENT CALENDARS: The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and noncontroversial. They will be acted upon without discussion unless an item is removed by Council Member for discussion. Members of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, and Public Finance Authority and may act on the consent calendar for those bodies as part of a single motion with the City Council consent calendar. D. CONSENT CALENDAR D1.Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Bi­Weekly Payroll in the Total Amount of $1,822,002.63 and City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers (Excluding Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company) in the Total Amount of $1,956,777.89 Dated December 17, 2021 Through December 30, 2021 and City and Fire District Electronic Debit Registers for the Month of December in the Total Amount of $1,563,074.46. (CITY/FIRE) D2.Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers for Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company in the Total Amount of $1,092.38 Dated December 17, 2021 Through December 30, 2021. (CITY/FIRE) D3.Consideration to Receive and File Current Investment Schedules as of December 31, 2021 for the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. (CITY/FIRE) D4.Consideration to Accept as Complete, File the Notice of Completion, and Authorize Release of Retention and Bonds for the Fiscal Year 2021/22 Local Slurry Seal Pavement Rehabilitation Project ­ Contract No. 2021­120. (CITY) D5.Consideration to Accept the Parks Painting Project FY 20­21 (CO# 2021­077) as Complete, File the Notice of Completion, and Authorize Release of Retention and Bonds. (CITY) D6.Consideration to Issue a Purchase Order for the Purchase of Fiber Optic Equipment from Calix, Inc. in the Amount of $100,000 and an Appropriation in the Amount of $150,000. (CITY) D7.Consideration of Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement with Kosmont & Associates, Inc., for Services Related to the Formation of an Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District (EIFD). (CITY) D8.Consideration of the Improvement Agreement and Improvement Securities for Street Improvements, Order Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 9, Street Light Maintenance Districts Nos. 1 and 8 for Case No. DRC2014­01130, Located at the Northwest Corner of Foothill Blvd. and East Avenue. (RESOLUTION NO. 2022­017) (RESOLUTION NO. 2022­018), (RESOLUTION NO. 2022­019) (CITY) D9.Consideration of a Resolution Authorizing Submittal of Applications for All CalRecycle Grant and Payment Programs for which the City of Rancho Cucamonga is Eligible. (RESOLUTION NO. 2022­020) (CITY) D10.Consideration of a Resolution Approving an Amendment to the Rancho Cucamonga Management Association and Part Time City Positions Salary Schedules for Fiscal Year 2021­ 2022. (RESOLUTION NO. 2022­021) (CITY) E. CONSENT CALENDAR ORDINANCE(S) ­ SECOND READING/ADOPTION E1.Consideration of Second Reading and Adoption of the Following: ORDINANCE NO. 992 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONSENTING TO ANNEXATION DRC2020­00185 AND APPROVING PREZONING DRC2020­00186 IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF TWO NEW INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS TOTALING APPROXIMATELY 655,878 SQUARE FEET ON AN APPROXIMATE 35­ACRE PROJECT SITE LOCATED AT ETIWANDA AVENUE NORTH OF NAPA STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF – APNs: 0229­291­23, 46 AND 54 ORDINANCE NO. 993 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2021­00175 BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND HILLWOOD ENTERPRISES, L.P., TO FACILITATE THE DEVELOPMENT OF TWO NEW INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS TOTALING APPROXIMATELY 655,878 SQUARE FEET ON AN APPROXIMATE 35­ACRE PROJECT SITE LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 650 FEET EAST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE AND NORTH OF NAPA STREET; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF – APN: 0229­291­46 AND 54 F. ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING ITEM(S) F1.Consideration of First Reading of Ordinance No. 995, to be Read by Title Only and Waive Further Reading, Amending Chapter 3.40 Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to Confirm That Short­Term Rentals are Subject to the City’s Transient Occupancy Tax, Further Clarify the Definition of Hotel and Transient Under the Chapter, Provide Regulations for Filing and Appeals Procedures, and Make Other Minor Amendments to the Chapter. (ORDINANCE NO. 995) (CITY) F2.Discussion, Consideration and Possible Action to Introduce, Waive Reading of and Adopt by a Four­ fifths Vote, for a Period of 45 Days, an Urgency Ordinance to Establish Objective Zoning And Subdivision Standards for Senate Bill 9 Projects in Single­Family Residential Zones, Declaring The Urgency Thereof and Making a Determination of Exemption Under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). (URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. 994) (CITY) F3.Consideration of a Resolution of Necessity for the Acquisition by Eminent Domain of Certain Real Property Interests for Public Purposes in Connection with the Phase 1, Segment 2, San Sevaine Trail Project, A Joint Agency Project with the City of Fontana (Chao Ping Yan, Terminus of Smokestone Street, East of Torrey Pine Court, San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Number 0228­044­ 24). (RESOLUTION NO. 2022­007) (CITY) F4.Consideration of Resolutions of Necessity of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Declaring Certain Real Property Interests Necessary for Public Purposes and Authorizing the Acquisition Thereof in Connection with the City’s Etiwanda Grade Separation Project (Kular Truck Line, Inc., 8783 Etiwanda Avenue and 12949 Whittram Avenue, San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Number 0229­ 162­14; Lightning PM, LLC, 8889 Etiwanda Avenue, San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 0229­291­17 & 18; SCG of DP Etiwanda, LLC, 8768 & 8822 Etiwanda Avenue, San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 0229­131­15, 16 & 26; Jones Family Trust, Garness Family Trust, & Clemons Revocable Trust, 8821 Etiwanda Avenue, San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Number 0229­162­15; Goodman Rancho SPE, LLC, 12521 Arrow Route and 8688 Etiwanda Avenue, San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 0229­131­30 & 31; BTC III Rancho Cucamonga Logistics Center, LP, 8996 Etiwanda Avenue, San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Number 0229­283­79; BCORE IE West Owner, LLC, 8939 Etiwanda Avenue, San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Number 0229­291­55; Southern California Edison Company, 8949 Etiwanda Avenue, San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Number 0229­291­ 22; Colombero Family Limited Partnership, 8685 ­ 8821 Etiwanda Avenue and 12928 ­ 12974 Whittram Avenue, San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 0229­151­15 & 28 and 0229­161­01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 19 & 20).  (RESOLUTION NOS. 2022­008, 2022­009, 2022­010, 2022­ 011, 2022­012, 2022­013, 2022­014, 2022­015, 2022­016) (CITY). G. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM(S) ­ CITY/FIRE DISTRICT G1.8:00 PM Time Certain: Public Hearing #3 ­ Consideration of City Council District Boundaries, to Include Review of the Demographer’s Preliminary Analysis; Review of the Public Mapping Tool and Inviting the Community to Submit Maps; Review of Staff’s Presentation of Maps Prepared Using the Discussed Criteria; and Receipt of Public Input on Communities of Interest and Potential District Boundaries. (CITY) H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORT(S) H1.Consideration of an Agreement with SDI Presence LLC for Enterprise Resource Planning Software Consulting Services and Authorizing an Appropriation in the Amount of $270,000. (CITY) I. COUNCIL BUSINESS I1.COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Council Member.) I2.INTER​AGENCY UPDATES (Update by the City Council to the community on the meetings that were attended.) J. CITY ATTORNEY ITEMS K. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING L. ADJOURNMENT CERTIFICATION I, Linda A. Troyan, MMC, City Clerk Services Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify under penalty of perjury that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on at least Seventy­Two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California and on the City's website.  LINDA A. TROYAN, MMC CITY CLERK SERVICES DIRECTOR If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's office at (909) 477­2700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired.  CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT “Our Vision is to build on our success as a world class community,to create an equitable,sustainable,and vibrant city,rich in opportunity for all to thrive.” Page 1 MayorL. Dennis MichaelMayor Pro TemLynne B. KennedyMembers of the CityCouncil:Ryan A. HutchisonKristine D. ScottSam Spagnolo AMENDED AGENDA(ITEMS F3 AND F4 UPDATED TO REFLECT APN’s 1/14/2022 1:00PM)CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGAREGULAR MEETING AGENDAJanuary 19, 202210500 Civic Center DriveRancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARD – CITY COUNCILHOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY­ SUCCESSOR AGENCY – PUBLICFINANCE AUTHORITYCLOSED SESSION TRI­COMMUNITIES ROOM 4:30 P.M.REGULAR MEETINGS        COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 P.M.The City Council meets regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m.in the Council Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive.  It Is the Intent to concludethe meeting by 10:00 p.m. unless extended by the concurrence of the City Council. Agendas, minutes, and recordings of meetings can be found at www.cityofrc.us or bycontacting the City Clerk's Office at 909­774­2023. Live Broadcast available on Channel 3(RCTV­3).In accordance with AB 361, and to ensure the health and safety of our residents by limitingcontact that could spread the COVID–19 virus, members of the public have the option toparticipate in this City Council/Fire District meeting via a teleconference. Members of thepublic may also attend the meeting in person.  Those wishing to speak during publiccommunication may call at the start of the meeting by dialing (909)774­2751, if speakingon a Public Hearing item, please dial in when the Public Hearing is being heard at(909)774­2751 to be added to the queue for public comment. Calls will be answered in theorder received.  Members of the public are encouraged to watch from the safety of theirhomes by Live Streaming on the City's website at https://www.cityofrc.us/your­government/city­council­agendas or Local Cable: RCTV­3 Programming.  The City ofRancho Cucamonga thanks you in advance for taking all precautions to prevent spreadingthe COVID­19 virus.CLOSED SESSION – 4:30 P.M.  TRI­COMMUNITIES ROOM ROLL CALL: Mayor Michael                        Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy                        Council Members Hutchison, Scott, and Spagnolo A. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) C. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS D. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION D1.CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR ROBERT NEIUBER, HUMAN RESOURCES DIRECTOR PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54954.2 REGARDING LABOR NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY EMPLOYEES’ ASSOCIATION (RCCEA), TEAMSTERS LOCAL 1932, RANCHO CUCAMONGA MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT GROUP – (CITY/FIRE) D2.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL ANTICIPATED LITIGATION: INITIATION OF LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9: 2 CASES – (CITY) D3.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL ANTICIPATED LITIGATION: INITIATION OF LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9: 1 CASE – (FIRE)  D4.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH(1) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: PEPE’S INC. V. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, CASE NO. 5:20CV02506JGBSP – (CITY) D5.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH(1) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: HIMNEL USA, INC. d/b/a ST. MARY'S MONTESSORI SCHOOL AND GLOBAL PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLC VS. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, SBSC CASE NO.: CIVDS 2014554. – (CITY) D6.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (1) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V. DR LANDMARK, INC.; POWER MEDIC TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; HOFER PROPERTIES, LLC; AND DOES 1 THROUGH 5 INCLUSIVE, SBSC CASE NO.: CIVDS 1904713 – (CITY) D7.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE TERMINUS OF SMOKESTONE STREET, EAST OF TORREY PINE COURT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 91739, IDENTIFIED AS COUNTY ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBER 0228­044­24, NEGOTIATING PARTIES JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND CHAO PING YANG; REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS. – (CITY) D8.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8949 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229­162­22; NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND OVERLAND, PACIFIC AND CUTLER, REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON, OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – (CITY) D9.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8783 ETIWANDA AVENUE/12949 WHITTRAM AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229­162­14; NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND OVERLAND, PACIFIC, AND CUTLER, REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND KULAR TRUCK LINE, INC., OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – (CITY) D10.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 9333 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229­162­23; NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND OVERLAND, PACIFIC AND CUTLER, REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON, OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – (CITY) D11.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8768 AND 8822 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229­131­15, ­16, AND ­26; NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND KELLY DEWITT, OVERLAND, PACIFIC, AND CUTLER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND SCG/DP ETIWANDA LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – (CITY) D12.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8996 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229­283­79; NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND KELLY DEWITT, OVERLAND, PACIFIC AND CUTLER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND BTC III RANCHO CUCAMONGA LOGISTICS CENTER LP, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – (CITY) D13.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8821 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229­162­15; NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND KELLY DEWITT, OVERLAND, PACIFIC AND CUTLER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND WILLIAM A. JONES AND JOAN F. JONES, TRUSTEES OF THE JONES FAMILY TRUST OF 2010, AS TO AN UNDIVIDED ONETHIRD (1/3) INTEREST, AND JAMES ROY GARNESS AND RHONDA ANN GARNESS, UNDIVIDED ONETHIRD (1/3) INTEREST, AND JAMES ROY GARNESS AND RHONDA ANN GARNESS, TRUSTEES OF THE GARNESS FAMILY TRUST DATED JUNE 28, 2012, AS TO AN UNDIVIDED ONETHIRD (1/3) INTEREST, AND JOHN S. CLEMONS AND PATRICIA R. CLEMONS, TRUSTEES OF THE CLEMONS REVOCABLE TRUST DATED DECEMBER 4, 2014, AS TO AN UNDIVIDED ONETHIRD (1/3) INTEREST, AS TENANTS IN COMMON, OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – (CITY) D14.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 12521 ARROW ROUTE AND 8688 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229­131­30 AND ­31; NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND KELLY DEWITT, OVERLAND, PACIFIC, AND CUTLER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND GOODMAN RANCHO SPE LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – (CITY) D15.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8889 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229­291­17 and ­18; NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND KELLY DEWITT, OVERLAND, PACIFIC, AND CUTLER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND LIGHTNING P.M. LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – (CITY) D16.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8685 TO 8821 ETIWANDA AVENUE AND 12928 TO 12974 WHITTRAM AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229­151­15 AND ­28, 0229­161­01, ­02, ­03, ­04, 05, ­19, AND ­20; NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND KELLY DEWITT, OVERLAND, PACIFIC, AND CUTLER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND COLOMBERO FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – (CITY) D17.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8939 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229­291­55; NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND KELLY DEWITT, OVERLAND, PACIFIC, AND CUTLER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND BCORE IE WEST OWNER LLC, OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – (CITY) D18.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 12467 BASE LINE ROAD IDENTIFIED AS PARCEL NUMBERS 1090331030000, 1090331040000, 1089581040000; NEGOTIATING PARTIES JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND JOSEPH FILIPPI, JOSEPH FILIPPI WINERY AND VINEYARDS; REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS. – (CITY) E. RECESS – Closed Session to Recess to the Regular City Council Meeting at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers at City Hall, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. REGULAR MEETING – 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL:Mayor Michael Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy Council Members Hutchison, Scott, and Spagnolo A. AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDA B. ANNOUNCEMENT / PRESENTATIONS C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS Members of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, and Public Finance Authority. This is the time and place for the general public to address the Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Council on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Mayor, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Fire Board, Agencies, Successor Agency, Authority Board, or City Council not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of the business portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topic contained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for these business items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of the agenda commences. Any other public communications which have not concluded during this one hour period may resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed. CONSENT CALENDARS: The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and noncontroversial. They will be acted upon without discussion unless an item is removed by Council Member for discussion. Members of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, and Public Finance Authority and may act on the consent calendar for those bodies as part of a single motion with the City Council consent calendar. D. CONSENT CALENDAR D1.Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Bi­Weekly Payroll in the Total Amount of $1,822,002.63 and City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers (Excluding Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company) in the Total Amount of $1,956,777.89 Dated December 17, 2021 Through December 30, 2021 and City and Fire District Electronic Debit Registers for the Month of December in the Total Amount of $1,563,074.46. (CITY/FIRE) D2.Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers for Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company in the Total Amount of $1,092.38 Dated December 17, 2021 Through December 30, 2021. (CITY/FIRE) D3.Consideration to Receive and File Current Investment Schedules as of December 31, 2021 for the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. (CITY/FIRE) D4.Consideration to Accept as Complete, File the Notice of Completion, and Authorize Release of Retention and Bonds for the Fiscal Year 2021/22 Local Slurry Seal Pavement Rehabilitation Project ­ Contract No. 2021­120. (CITY) D5.Consideration to Accept the Parks Painting Project FY 20­21 (CO# 2021­077) as Complete, File the Notice of Completion, and Authorize Release of Retention and Bonds. (CITY) D6.Consideration to Issue a Purchase Order for the Purchase of Fiber Optic Equipment from Calix, Inc. in the Amount of $100,000 and an Appropriation in the Amount of $150,000. (CITY) D7.Consideration of Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement with Kosmont & Associates, Inc., for Services Related to the Formation of an Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District (EIFD). (CITY) D8.Consideration of the Improvement Agreement and Improvement Securities for Street Improvements, Order Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 9, Street Light Maintenance Districts Nos. 1 and 8 for Case No. DRC2014­01130, Located at the Northwest Corner of Foothill Blvd. and East Avenue. (RESOLUTION NO. 2022­017) (RESOLUTION NO. 2022­018), (RESOLUTION NO. 2022­019) (CITY) D9.Consideration of a Resolution Authorizing Submittal of Applications for All CalRecycle Grant and Payment Programs for which the City of Rancho Cucamonga is Eligible. (RESOLUTION NO. 2022­020) (CITY) D10.Consideration of a Resolution Approving an Amendment to the Rancho Cucamonga Management Association and Part Time City Positions Salary Schedules for Fiscal Year 2021­ 2022. (RESOLUTION NO. 2022­021) (CITY) E. CONSENT CALENDAR ORDINANCE(S) ­ SECOND READING/ADOPTION E1.Consideration of Second Reading and Adoption of the Following: ORDINANCE NO. 992 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONSENTING TO ANNEXATION DRC2020­00185 AND APPROVING PREZONING DRC2020­00186 IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF TWO NEW INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS TOTALING APPROXIMATELY 655,878 SQUARE FEET ON AN APPROXIMATE 35­ACRE PROJECT SITE LOCATED AT ETIWANDA AVENUE NORTH OF NAPA STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF – APNs: 0229­291­23, 46 AND 54 ORDINANCE NO. 993 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2021­00175 BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND HILLWOOD ENTERPRISES, L.P., TO FACILITATE THE DEVELOPMENT OF TWO NEW INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS TOTALING APPROXIMATELY 655,878 SQUARE FEET ON AN APPROXIMATE 35­ACRE PROJECT SITE LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 650 FEET EAST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE AND NORTH OF NAPA STREET; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF – APN: 0229­291­46 AND 54 F. ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING ITEM(S) F1.Consideration of First Reading of Ordinance No. 995, to be Read by Title Only and Waive Further Reading, Amending Chapter 3.40 Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to Confirm That Short­Term Rentals are Subject to the City’s Transient Occupancy Tax, Further Clarify the Definition of Hotel and Transient Under the Chapter, Provide Regulations for Filing and Appeals Procedures, and Make Other Minor Amendments to the Chapter. (ORDINANCE NO. 995) (CITY) F2.Discussion, Consideration and Possible Action to Introduce, Waive Reading of and Adopt by a Four­ fifths Vote, for a Period of 45 Days, an Urgency Ordinance to Establish Objective Zoning And Subdivision Standards for Senate Bill 9 Projects in Single­Family Residential Zones, Declaring The Urgency Thereof and Making a Determination of Exemption Under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). (URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. 994) (CITY) F3.Consideration of a Resolution of Necessity for the Acquisition by Eminent Domain of Certain Real Property Interests for Public Purposes in Connection with the Phase 1, Segment 2, San Sevaine Trail Project, A Joint Agency Project with the City of Fontana (Chao Ping Yan, Terminus of Smokestone Street, East of Torrey Pine Court, San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Number 0228­044­ 24). (RESOLUTION NO. 2022­007) (CITY) F4.Consideration of Resolutions of Necessity of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Declaring Certain Real Property Interests Necessary for Public Purposes and Authorizing the Acquisition Thereof in Connection with the City’s Etiwanda Grade Separation Project (Kular Truck Line, Inc., 8783 Etiwanda Avenue and 12949 Whittram Avenue, San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Number 0229­ 162­14; Lightning PM, LLC, 8889 Etiwanda Avenue, San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 0229­291­17 & 18; SCG of DP Etiwanda, LLC, 8768 & 8822 Etiwanda Avenue, San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 0229­131­15, 16 & 26; Jones Family Trust, Garness Family Trust, & Clemons Revocable Trust, 8821 Etiwanda Avenue, San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Number 0229­162­15; Goodman Rancho SPE, LLC, 12521 Arrow Route and 8688 Etiwanda Avenue, San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 0229­131­30 & 31; BTC III Rancho Cucamonga Logistics Center, LP, 8996 Etiwanda Avenue, San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Number 0229­283­79; BCORE IE West Owner, LLC, 8939 Etiwanda Avenue, San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Number 0229­291­55; Southern California Edison Company, 8949 Etiwanda Avenue, San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Number 0229­291­ 22; Colombero Family Limited Partnership, 8685 ­ 8821 Etiwanda Avenue and 12928 ­ 12974 Whittram Avenue, San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 0229­151­15 & 28 and 0229­161­01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 19 & 20).  (RESOLUTION NOS. 2022­008, 2022­009, 2022­010, 2022­ 011, 2022­012, 2022­013, 2022­014, 2022­015, 2022­016) (CITY). G. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM(S) ­ CITY/FIRE DISTRICT G1.8:00 PM Time Certain: Public Hearing #3 ­ Consideration of City Council District Boundaries, to Include Review of the Demographer’s Preliminary Analysis; Review of the Public Mapping Tool and Inviting the Community to Submit Maps; Review of Staff’s Presentation of Maps Prepared Using the Discussed Criteria; and Receipt of Public Input on Communities of Interest and Potential District Boundaries. (CITY) H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORT(S) H1.Consideration of an Agreement with SDI Presence LLC for Enterprise Resource Planning Software Consulting Services and Authorizing an Appropriation in the Amount of $270,000. (CITY) I. COUNCIL BUSINESS I1.COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Council Member.) I2.INTER​AGENCY UPDATES (Update by the City Council to the community on the meetings that were attended.) J. CITY ATTORNEY ITEMS K. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING L. ADJOURNMENT CERTIFICATION I, Linda A. Troyan, MMC, City Clerk Services Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify under penalty of perjury that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on at least Seventy­Two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California and on the City's website.  LINDA A. TROYAN, MMC CITY CLERK SERVICES DIRECTOR If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's office at (909) 477­2700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired.  CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT “Our Vision is to build on our success as a world class community,to create an equitable,sustainable,and vibrant city,rich in opportunity for all to thrive.” Page 2 MayorL. Dennis MichaelMayor Pro TemLynne B. KennedyMembers of the CityCouncil:Ryan A. HutchisonKristine D. ScottSam Spagnolo AMENDED AGENDA(ITEMS F3 AND F4 UPDATED TO REFLECT APN’s 1/14/2022 1:00PM)CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGAREGULAR MEETING AGENDAJanuary 19, 202210500 Civic Center DriveRancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARD – CITY COUNCILHOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY­ SUCCESSOR AGENCY – PUBLICFINANCE AUTHORITYCLOSED SESSION TRI­COMMUNITIES ROOM 4:30 P.M.REGULAR MEETINGS        COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 P.M.The City Council meets regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m.in the Council Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive.  It Is the Intent to concludethe meeting by 10:00 p.m. unless extended by the concurrence of the City Council. Agendas, minutes, and recordings of meetings can be found at www.cityofrc.us or bycontacting the City Clerk's Office at 909­774­2023. Live Broadcast available on Channel 3(RCTV­3).In accordance with AB 361, and to ensure the health and safety of our residents by limitingcontact that could spread the COVID–19 virus, members of the public have the option toparticipate in this City Council/Fire District meeting via a teleconference. Members of thepublic may also attend the meeting in person.  Those wishing to speak during publiccommunication may call at the start of the meeting by dialing (909)774­2751, if speakingon a Public Hearing item, please dial in when the Public Hearing is being heard at(909)774­2751 to be added to the queue for public comment. Calls will be answered in theorder received.  Members of the public are encouraged to watch from the safety of theirhomes by Live Streaming on the City's website at https://www.cityofrc.us/your­government/city­council­agendas or Local Cable: RCTV­3 Programming.  The City ofRancho Cucamonga thanks you in advance for taking all precautions to prevent spreadingthe COVID­19 virus.CLOSED SESSION – 4:30 P.M.  TRI­COMMUNITIES ROOM ROLL CALL: Mayor Michael                        Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy                        Council Members Hutchison, Scott, and Spagnolo A. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)C. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTSD. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSIOND1.CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR ROBERT NEIUBER, HUMAN RESOURCESDIRECTOR PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54954.2 REGARDING LABOR NEGOTIATIONSWITH THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY EMPLOYEES’ ASSOCIATION (RCCEA), TEAMSTERSLOCAL 1932, RANCHO CUCAMONGA MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENTGROUP – (CITY/FIRE)D2.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL ANTICIPATED LITIGATION: INITIATION OF LITIGATIONPURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.9: 2 CASES – (CITY)D3.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL ANTICIPATED LITIGATION: INITIATION OF LITIGATIONPURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.9: 1 CASE – (FIRE) D4.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH(1)OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: PEPE’S INC. V. CITY OF RANCHOCUCAMONGA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, CASENO. 5:20CV02506JGBSP – (CITY)D5.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH(1)OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: HIMNEL USA, INC. d/b/a ST. MARY'SMONTESSORI SCHOOL AND GLOBAL PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLC VS. CITY OF RANCHOCUCAMONGA, SBSC CASE NO.: CIVDS 2014554. – (CITY)D6.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH(1) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHOCUCAMONGA V. DR LANDMARK, INC.; POWER MEDIC TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; HOFERPROPERTIES, LLC; AND DOES 1 THROUGH 5 INCLUSIVE, SBSC CASE NO.: CIVDS 1904713 –(CITY)D7.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE TERMINUS OF SMOKESTONE STREET, EAST OFTORREY PINE COURT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 91739, IDENTIFIED AS COUNTYASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBER 0228­044­24, NEGOTIATING PARTIES JOHN GILLISON, CITYMANAGER REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND CHAO PING YANG;REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS. – (CITY)D8.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8949 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED ASSAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229­162­22; NEGOTIATINGPARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND OVERLAND, PACIFIC AND CUTLER,REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON, OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – (CITY) D9.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8783 ETIWANDA AVENUE/12949 WHITTRAM AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229­162­14; NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND OVERLAND, PACIFIC, AND CUTLER, REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND KULAR TRUCK LINE, INC., OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – (CITY) D10.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 9333 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229­162­23; NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND OVERLAND, PACIFIC AND CUTLER, REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON, OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – (CITY) D11.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8768 AND 8822 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229­131­15, ­16, AND ­26; NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND KELLY DEWITT, OVERLAND, PACIFIC, AND CUTLER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND SCG/DP ETIWANDA LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – (CITY) D12.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8996 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229­283­79; NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND KELLY DEWITT, OVERLAND, PACIFIC AND CUTLER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND BTC III RANCHO CUCAMONGA LOGISTICS CENTER LP, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – (CITY) D13.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8821 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229­162­15; NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND KELLY DEWITT, OVERLAND, PACIFIC AND CUTLER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND WILLIAM A. JONES AND JOAN F. JONES, TRUSTEES OF THE JONES FAMILY TRUST OF 2010, AS TO AN UNDIVIDED ONETHIRD (1/3) INTEREST, AND JAMES ROY GARNESS AND RHONDA ANN GARNESS, UNDIVIDED ONETHIRD (1/3) INTEREST, AND JAMES ROY GARNESS AND RHONDA ANN GARNESS, TRUSTEES OF THE GARNESS FAMILY TRUST DATED JUNE 28, 2012, AS TO AN UNDIVIDED ONETHIRD (1/3) INTEREST, AND JOHN S. CLEMONS AND PATRICIA R. CLEMONS, TRUSTEES OF THE CLEMONS REVOCABLE TRUST DATED DECEMBER 4, 2014, AS TO AN UNDIVIDED ONETHIRD (1/3) INTEREST, AS TENANTS IN COMMON, OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – (CITY) D14.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 12521 ARROW ROUTE AND 8688 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229­131­30 AND ­31; NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND KELLY DEWITT, OVERLAND, PACIFIC, AND CUTLER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND GOODMAN RANCHO SPE LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – (CITY) D15.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8889 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229­291­17 and ­18; NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND KELLY DEWITT, OVERLAND, PACIFIC, AND CUTLER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND LIGHTNING P.M. LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – (CITY) D16.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8685 TO 8821 ETIWANDA AVENUE AND 12928 TO 12974 WHITTRAM AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229­151­15 AND ­28, 0229­161­01, ­02, ­03, ­04, 05, ­19, AND ­20; NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND KELLY DEWITT, OVERLAND, PACIFIC, AND CUTLER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND COLOMBERO FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – (CITY) D17.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8939 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229­291­55; NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND KELLY DEWITT, OVERLAND, PACIFIC, AND CUTLER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND BCORE IE WEST OWNER LLC, OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – (CITY) D18.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 12467 BASE LINE ROAD IDENTIFIED AS PARCEL NUMBERS 1090331030000, 1090331040000, 1089581040000; NEGOTIATING PARTIES JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND JOSEPH FILIPPI, JOSEPH FILIPPI WINERY AND VINEYARDS; REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS. – (CITY) E. RECESS – Closed Session to Recess to the Regular City Council Meeting at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers at City Hall, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. REGULAR MEETING – 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL:Mayor Michael Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy Council Members Hutchison, Scott, and Spagnolo A. AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDA B. ANNOUNCEMENT / PRESENTATIONS C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS Members of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, and Public Finance Authority. This is the time and place for the general public to address the Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Council on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Mayor, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Fire Board, Agencies, Successor Agency, Authority Board, or City Council not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of the business portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topic contained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for these business items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of the agenda commences. Any other public communications which have not concluded during this one hour period may resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed. CONSENT CALENDARS: The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and noncontroversial. They will be acted upon without discussion unless an item is removed by Council Member for discussion. Members of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, and Public Finance Authority and may act on the consent calendar for those bodies as part of a single motion with the City Council consent calendar. D. CONSENT CALENDAR D1.Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Bi­Weekly Payroll in the Total Amount of $1,822,002.63 and City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers (Excluding Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company) in the Total Amount of $1,956,777.89 Dated December 17, 2021 Through December 30, 2021 and City and Fire District Electronic Debit Registers for the Month of December in the Total Amount of $1,563,074.46. (CITY/FIRE) D2.Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers for Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company in the Total Amount of $1,092.38 Dated December 17, 2021 Through December 30, 2021. (CITY/FIRE) D3.Consideration to Receive and File Current Investment Schedules as of December 31, 2021 for the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. (CITY/FIRE) D4.Consideration to Accept as Complete, File the Notice of Completion, and Authorize Release of Retention and Bonds for the Fiscal Year 2021/22 Local Slurry Seal Pavement Rehabilitation Project ­ Contract No. 2021­120. (CITY) D5.Consideration to Accept the Parks Painting Project FY 20­21 (CO# 2021­077) as Complete, File the Notice of Completion, and Authorize Release of Retention and Bonds. (CITY) D6.Consideration to Issue a Purchase Order for the Purchase of Fiber Optic Equipment from Calix, Inc. in the Amount of $100,000 and an Appropriation in the Amount of $150,000. (CITY) D7.Consideration of Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement with Kosmont & Associates, Inc., for Services Related to the Formation of an Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District (EIFD). (CITY) D8.Consideration of the Improvement Agreement and Improvement Securities for Street Improvements, Order Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 9, Street Light Maintenance Districts Nos. 1 and 8 for Case No. DRC2014­01130, Located at the Northwest Corner of Foothill Blvd. and East Avenue. (RESOLUTION NO. 2022­017) (RESOLUTION NO. 2022­018), (RESOLUTION NO. 2022­019) (CITY) D9.Consideration of a Resolution Authorizing Submittal of Applications for All CalRecycle Grant and Payment Programs for which the City of Rancho Cucamonga is Eligible. (RESOLUTION NO. 2022­020) (CITY) D10.Consideration of a Resolution Approving an Amendment to the Rancho Cucamonga Management Association and Part Time City Positions Salary Schedules for Fiscal Year 2021­ 2022. (RESOLUTION NO. 2022­021) (CITY) E. CONSENT CALENDAR ORDINANCE(S) ­ SECOND READING/ADOPTION E1.Consideration of Second Reading and Adoption of the Following: ORDINANCE NO. 992 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONSENTING TO ANNEXATION DRC2020­00185 AND APPROVING PREZONING DRC2020­00186 IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF TWO NEW INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS TOTALING APPROXIMATELY 655,878 SQUARE FEET ON AN APPROXIMATE 35­ACRE PROJECT SITE LOCATED AT ETIWANDA AVENUE NORTH OF NAPA STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF – APNs: 0229­291­23, 46 AND 54 ORDINANCE NO. 993 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2021­00175 BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND HILLWOOD ENTERPRISES, L.P., TO FACILITATE THE DEVELOPMENT OF TWO NEW INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS TOTALING APPROXIMATELY 655,878 SQUARE FEET ON AN APPROXIMATE 35­ACRE PROJECT SITE LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 650 FEET EAST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE AND NORTH OF NAPA STREET; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF – APN: 0229­291­46 AND 54 F. ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING ITEM(S) F1.Consideration of First Reading of Ordinance No. 995, to be Read by Title Only and Waive Further Reading, Amending Chapter 3.40 Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to Confirm That Short­Term Rentals are Subject to the City’s Transient Occupancy Tax, Further Clarify the Definition of Hotel and Transient Under the Chapter, Provide Regulations for Filing and Appeals Procedures, and Make Other Minor Amendments to the Chapter. (ORDINANCE NO. 995) (CITY) F2.Discussion, Consideration and Possible Action to Introduce, Waive Reading of and Adopt by a Four­ fifths Vote, for a Period of 45 Days, an Urgency Ordinance to Establish Objective Zoning And Subdivision Standards for Senate Bill 9 Projects in Single­Family Residential Zones, Declaring The Urgency Thereof and Making a Determination of Exemption Under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). (URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. 994) (CITY) F3.Consideration of a Resolution of Necessity for the Acquisition by Eminent Domain of Certain Real Property Interests for Public Purposes in Connection with the Phase 1, Segment 2, San Sevaine Trail Project, A Joint Agency Project with the City of Fontana (Chao Ping Yan, Terminus of Smokestone Street, East of Torrey Pine Court, San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Number 0228­044­ 24). (RESOLUTION NO. 2022­007) (CITY) F4.Consideration of Resolutions of Necessity of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Declaring Certain Real Property Interests Necessary for Public Purposes and Authorizing the Acquisition Thereof in Connection with the City’s Etiwanda Grade Separation Project (Kular Truck Line, Inc., 8783 Etiwanda Avenue and 12949 Whittram Avenue, San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Number 0229­ 162­14; Lightning PM, LLC, 8889 Etiwanda Avenue, San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 0229­291­17 & 18; SCG of DP Etiwanda, LLC, 8768 & 8822 Etiwanda Avenue, San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 0229­131­15, 16 & 26; Jones Family Trust, Garness Family Trust, & Clemons Revocable Trust, 8821 Etiwanda Avenue, San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Number 0229­162­15; Goodman Rancho SPE, LLC, 12521 Arrow Route and 8688 Etiwanda Avenue, San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 0229­131­30 & 31; BTC III Rancho Cucamonga Logistics Center, LP, 8996 Etiwanda Avenue, San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Number 0229­283­79; BCORE IE West Owner, LLC, 8939 Etiwanda Avenue, San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Number 0229­291­55; Southern California Edison Company, 8949 Etiwanda Avenue, San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Number 0229­291­ 22; Colombero Family Limited Partnership, 8685 ­ 8821 Etiwanda Avenue and 12928 ­ 12974 Whittram Avenue, San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 0229­151­15 & 28 and 0229­161­01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 19 & 20).  (RESOLUTION NOS. 2022­008, 2022­009, 2022­010, 2022­ 011, 2022­012, 2022­013, 2022­014, 2022­015, 2022­016) (CITY). G. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM(S) ­ CITY/FIRE DISTRICT G1.8:00 PM Time Certain: Public Hearing #3 ­ Consideration of City Council District Boundaries, to Include Review of the Demographer’s Preliminary Analysis; Review of the Public Mapping Tool and Inviting the Community to Submit Maps; Review of Staff’s Presentation of Maps Prepared Using the Discussed Criteria; and Receipt of Public Input on Communities of Interest and Potential District Boundaries. (CITY) H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORT(S) H1.Consideration of an Agreement with SDI Presence LLC for Enterprise Resource Planning Software Consulting Services and Authorizing an Appropriation in the Amount of $270,000. (CITY) I. COUNCIL BUSINESS I1.COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Council Member.) I2.INTER​AGENCY UPDATES (Update by the City Council to the community on the meetings that were attended.) J. CITY ATTORNEY ITEMS K. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING L. ADJOURNMENT CERTIFICATION I, Linda A. Troyan, MMC, City Clerk Services Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify under penalty of perjury that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on at least Seventy­Two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California and on the City's website.  LINDA A. TROYAN, MMC CITY CLERK SERVICES DIRECTOR If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's office at (909) 477­2700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired.  CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT “Our Vision is to build on our success as a world class community,to create an equitable,sustainable,and vibrant city,rich in opportunity for all to thrive.” Page 3 MayorL. Dennis MichaelMayor Pro TemLynne B. KennedyMembers of the CityCouncil:Ryan A. HutchisonKristine D. ScottSam Spagnolo AMENDED AGENDA(ITEMS F3 AND F4 UPDATED TO REFLECT APN’s 1/14/2022 1:00PM)CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGAREGULAR MEETING AGENDAJanuary 19, 202210500 Civic Center DriveRancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARD – CITY COUNCILHOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY­ SUCCESSOR AGENCY – PUBLICFINANCE AUTHORITYCLOSED SESSION TRI­COMMUNITIES ROOM 4:30 P.M.REGULAR MEETINGS        COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 P.M.The City Council meets regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m.in the Council Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive.  It Is the Intent to concludethe meeting by 10:00 p.m. unless extended by the concurrence of the City Council. Agendas, minutes, and recordings of meetings can be found at www.cityofrc.us or bycontacting the City Clerk's Office at 909­774­2023. Live Broadcast available on Channel 3(RCTV­3).In accordance with AB 361, and to ensure the health and safety of our residents by limitingcontact that could spread the COVID–19 virus, members of the public have the option toparticipate in this City Council/Fire District meeting via a teleconference. Members of thepublic may also attend the meeting in person.  Those wishing to speak during publiccommunication may call at the start of the meeting by dialing (909)774­2751, if speakingon a Public Hearing item, please dial in when the Public Hearing is being heard at(909)774­2751 to be added to the queue for public comment. Calls will be answered in theorder received.  Members of the public are encouraged to watch from the safety of theirhomes by Live Streaming on the City's website at https://www.cityofrc.us/your­government/city­council­agendas or Local Cable: RCTV­3 Programming.  The City ofRancho Cucamonga thanks you in advance for taking all precautions to prevent spreadingthe COVID­19 virus.CLOSED SESSION – 4:30 P.M.  TRI­COMMUNITIES ROOM ROLL CALL: Mayor Michael                        Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy                        Council Members Hutchison, Scott, and Spagnolo A. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)C. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTSD. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSIOND1.CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR ROBERT NEIUBER, HUMAN RESOURCESDIRECTOR PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54954.2 REGARDING LABOR NEGOTIATIONSWITH THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY EMPLOYEES’ ASSOCIATION (RCCEA), TEAMSTERSLOCAL 1932, RANCHO CUCAMONGA MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENTGROUP – (CITY/FIRE)D2.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL ANTICIPATED LITIGATION: INITIATION OF LITIGATIONPURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.9: 2 CASES – (CITY)D3.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL ANTICIPATED LITIGATION: INITIATION OF LITIGATIONPURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.9: 1 CASE – (FIRE) D4.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH(1)OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: PEPE’S INC. V. CITY OF RANCHOCUCAMONGA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, CASENO. 5:20CV02506JGBSP – (CITY)D5.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH(1)OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: HIMNEL USA, INC. d/b/a ST. MARY'SMONTESSORI SCHOOL AND GLOBAL PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLC VS. CITY OF RANCHOCUCAMONGA, SBSC CASE NO.: CIVDS 2014554. – (CITY)D6.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH(1) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHOCUCAMONGA V. DR LANDMARK, INC.; POWER MEDIC TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; HOFERPROPERTIES, LLC; AND DOES 1 THROUGH 5 INCLUSIVE, SBSC CASE NO.: CIVDS 1904713 –(CITY)D7.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE TERMINUS OF SMOKESTONE STREET, EAST OFTORREY PINE COURT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 91739, IDENTIFIED AS COUNTYASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBER 0228­044­24, NEGOTIATING PARTIES JOHN GILLISON, CITYMANAGER REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND CHAO PING YANG;REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS. – (CITY)D8.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8949 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED ASSAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229­162­22; NEGOTIATINGPARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND OVERLAND, PACIFIC AND CUTLER,REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON,OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATINGPARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – (CITY)D9.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8783 ETIWANDA AVENUE/12949 WHITTRAM AVENUE,FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER0229­162­14; NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND OVERLAND,PACIFIC, AND CUTLER, REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND KULARTRUCK LINE, INC., OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNINGPRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTHABOVE. – (CITY)D10.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 9333 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED ASSAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229­162­23; NEGOTIATINGPARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND OVERLAND, PACIFIC AND CUTLER,REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON,OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATINGPARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – (CITY)D11.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8768 AND 8822 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHERIDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229­131­15,­16, AND ­26; NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND KELLY DEWITT,OVERLAND, PACIFIC, AND CUTLER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,AND SCG/DP ETIWANDA LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, OWNER;REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIESMAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – (CITY)D12.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8996 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED ASSAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229­283­79; NEGOTIATINGPARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND KELLY DEWITT, OVERLAND, PACIFIC ANDCUTLER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND BTC III RANCHOCUCAMONGA LOGISTICS CENTER LP, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, OWNER;REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIESMAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – (CITY)D13.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8821 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED ASSAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229­162­15; NEGOTIATINGPARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND KELLY DEWITT, OVERLAND, PACIFIC ANDCUTLER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND WILLIAM A. JONES ANDJOAN F. JONES, TRUSTEES OF THE JONES FAMILY TRUST OF 2010, AS TO AN UNDIVIDEDONETHIRD (1/3) INTEREST, AND JAMES ROY GARNESS AND RHONDA ANN GARNESS,UNDIVIDED ONETHIRD (1/3) INTEREST, AND JAMES ROY GARNESS AND RHONDA ANNGARNESS, TRUSTEES OF THE GARNESS FAMILY TRUST DATED JUNE 28, 2012, AS TO ANUNDIVIDED ONETHIRD (1/3) INTEREST, AND JOHN S. CLEMONS AND PATRICIA R. CLEMONS,TRUSTEES OF THE CLEMONS REVOCABLE TRUST DATED DECEMBER 4, 2014, AS TO ANUNDIVIDED ONETHIRD (1/3) INTEREST, AS TENANTS IN COMMON, OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – (CITY) D14.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 12521 ARROW ROUTE AND 8688 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229­131­30 AND ­31; NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND KELLY DEWITT, OVERLAND, PACIFIC, AND CUTLER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND GOODMAN RANCHO SPE LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – (CITY) D15.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8889 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229­291­17 and ­18; NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND KELLY DEWITT, OVERLAND, PACIFIC, AND CUTLER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND LIGHTNING P.M. LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – (CITY) D16.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8685 TO 8821 ETIWANDA AVENUE AND 12928 TO 12974 WHITTRAM AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229­151­15 AND ­28, 0229­161­01, ­02, ­03, ­04, 05, ­19, AND ­20; NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND KELLY DEWITT, OVERLAND, PACIFIC, AND CUTLER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND COLOMBERO FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – (CITY) D17.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8939 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229­291­55; NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND KELLY DEWITT, OVERLAND, PACIFIC, AND CUTLER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND BCORE IE WEST OWNER LLC, OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – (CITY) D18.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 12467 BASE LINE ROAD IDENTIFIED AS PARCEL NUMBERS 1090331030000, 1090331040000, 1089581040000; NEGOTIATING PARTIES JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND JOSEPH FILIPPI, JOSEPH FILIPPI WINERY AND VINEYARDS; REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS. – (CITY) E. RECESS – Closed Session to Recess to the Regular City Council Meeting at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers at City Hall, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. REGULAR MEETING – 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL:Mayor Michael Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy Council Members Hutchison, Scott, and Spagnolo A. AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDA B. ANNOUNCEMENT / PRESENTATIONS C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS Members of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, and Public Finance Authority. This is the time and place for the general public to address the Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Council on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Mayor, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Fire Board, Agencies, Successor Agency, Authority Board, or City Council not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of the business portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topic contained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for these business items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of the agenda commences. Any other public communications which have not concluded during this one hour period may resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed. CONSENT CALENDARS: The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and noncontroversial. They will be acted upon without discussion unless an item is removed by Council Member for discussion. Members of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, and Public Finance Authority and may act on the consent calendar for those bodies as part of a single motion with the City Council consent calendar. D. CONSENT CALENDAR D1.Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Bi­Weekly Payroll in the Total Amount of $1,822,002.63 and City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers (Excluding Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company) in the Total Amount of $1,956,777.89 Dated December 17, 2021 Through December 30, 2021 and City and Fire District Electronic Debit Registers for the Month of December in the Total Amount of $1,563,074.46. (CITY/FIRE) D2.Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers for Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company in the Total Amount of $1,092.38 Dated December 17, 2021 Through December 30, 2021. (CITY/FIRE) D3.Consideration to Receive and File Current Investment Schedules as of December 31, 2021 for the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. (CITY/FIRE) D4.Consideration to Accept as Complete, File the Notice of Completion, and Authorize Release of Retention and Bonds for the Fiscal Year 2021/22 Local Slurry Seal Pavement Rehabilitation Project ­ Contract No. 2021­120. (CITY) D5.Consideration to Accept the Parks Painting Project FY 20­21 (CO# 2021­077) as Complete, File the Notice of Completion, and Authorize Release of Retention and Bonds. (CITY) D6.Consideration to Issue a Purchase Order for the Purchase of Fiber Optic Equipment from Calix, Inc. in the Amount of $100,000 and an Appropriation in the Amount of $150,000. (CITY) D7.Consideration of Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement with Kosmont & Associates, Inc., for Services Related to the Formation of an Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District (EIFD). (CITY) D8.Consideration of the Improvement Agreement and Improvement Securities for Street Improvements, Order Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 9, Street Light Maintenance Districts Nos. 1 and 8 for Case No. DRC2014­01130, Located at the Northwest Corner of Foothill Blvd. and East Avenue. (RESOLUTION NO. 2022­017) (RESOLUTION NO. 2022­018), (RESOLUTION NO. 2022­019) (CITY) D9.Consideration of a Resolution Authorizing Submittal of Applications for All CalRecycle Grant and Payment Programs for which the City of Rancho Cucamonga is Eligible. (RESOLUTION NO. 2022­020) (CITY) D10.Consideration of a Resolution Approving an Amendment to the Rancho Cucamonga Management Association and Part Time City Positions Salary Schedules for Fiscal Year 2021­ 2022. (RESOLUTION NO. 2022­021) (CITY) E. CONSENT CALENDAR ORDINANCE(S) ­ SECOND READING/ADOPTION E1.Consideration of Second Reading and Adoption of the Following: ORDINANCE NO. 992 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONSENTING TO ANNEXATION DRC2020­00185 AND APPROVING PREZONING DRC2020­00186 IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF TWO NEW INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS TOTALING APPROXIMATELY 655,878 SQUARE FEET ON AN APPROXIMATE 35­ACRE PROJECT SITE LOCATED AT ETIWANDA AVENUE NORTH OF NAPA STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF – APNs: 0229­291­23, 46 AND 54 ORDINANCE NO. 993 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2021­00175 BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND HILLWOOD ENTERPRISES, L.P., TO FACILITATE THE DEVELOPMENT OF TWO NEW INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS TOTALING APPROXIMATELY 655,878 SQUARE FEET ON AN APPROXIMATE 35­ACRE PROJECT SITE LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 650 FEET EAST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE AND NORTH OF NAPA STREET; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF – APN: 0229­291­46 AND 54 F. ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING ITEM(S) F1.Consideration of First Reading of Ordinance No. 995, to be Read by Title Only and Waive Further Reading, Amending Chapter 3.40 Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to Confirm That Short­Term Rentals are Subject to the City’s Transient Occupancy Tax, Further Clarify the Definition of Hotel and Transient Under the Chapter, Provide Regulations for Filing and Appeals Procedures, and Make Other Minor Amendments to the Chapter. (ORDINANCE NO. 995) (CITY) F2.Discussion, Consideration and Possible Action to Introduce, Waive Reading of and Adopt by a Four­ fifths Vote, for a Period of 45 Days, an Urgency Ordinance to Establish Objective Zoning And Subdivision Standards for Senate Bill 9 Projects in Single­Family Residential Zones, Declaring The Urgency Thereof and Making a Determination of Exemption Under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). (URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. 994) (CITY) F3.Consideration of a Resolution of Necessity for the Acquisition by Eminent Domain of Certain Real Property Interests for Public Purposes in Connection with the Phase 1, Segment 2, San Sevaine Trail Project, A Joint Agency Project with the City of Fontana (Chao Ping Yan, Terminus of Smokestone Street, East of Torrey Pine Court, San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Number 0228­044­ 24). (RESOLUTION NO. 2022­007) (CITY) F4.Consideration of Resolutions of Necessity of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Declaring Certain Real Property Interests Necessary for Public Purposes and Authorizing the Acquisition Thereof in Connection with the City’s Etiwanda Grade Separation Project (Kular Truck Line, Inc., 8783 Etiwanda Avenue and 12949 Whittram Avenue, San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Number 0229­ 162­14; Lightning PM, LLC, 8889 Etiwanda Avenue, San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 0229­291­17 & 18; SCG of DP Etiwanda, LLC, 8768 & 8822 Etiwanda Avenue, San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 0229­131­15, 16 & 26; Jones Family Trust, Garness Family Trust, & Clemons Revocable Trust, 8821 Etiwanda Avenue, San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Number 0229­162­15; Goodman Rancho SPE, LLC, 12521 Arrow Route and 8688 Etiwanda Avenue, San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 0229­131­30 & 31; BTC III Rancho Cucamonga Logistics Center, LP, 8996 Etiwanda Avenue, San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Number 0229­283­79; BCORE IE West Owner, LLC, 8939 Etiwanda Avenue, San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Number 0229­291­55; Southern California Edison Company, 8949 Etiwanda Avenue, San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Number 0229­291­ 22; Colombero Family Limited Partnership, 8685 ­ 8821 Etiwanda Avenue and 12928 ­ 12974 Whittram Avenue, San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 0229­151­15 & 28 and 0229­161­01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 19 & 20).  (RESOLUTION NOS. 2022­008, 2022­009, 2022­010, 2022­ 011, 2022­012, 2022­013, 2022­014, 2022­015, 2022­016) (CITY). G. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM(S) ­ CITY/FIRE DISTRICT G1.8:00 PM Time Certain: Public Hearing #3 ­ Consideration of City Council District Boundaries, to Include Review of the Demographer’s Preliminary Analysis; Review of the Public Mapping Tool and Inviting the Community to Submit Maps; Review of Staff’s Presentation of Maps Prepared Using the Discussed Criteria; and Receipt of Public Input on Communities of Interest and Potential District Boundaries. (CITY) H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORT(S) H1.Consideration of an Agreement with SDI Presence LLC for Enterprise Resource Planning Software Consulting Services and Authorizing an Appropriation in the Amount of $270,000. (CITY) I. COUNCIL BUSINESS I1.COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Council Member.) I2.INTER​AGENCY UPDATES (Update by the City Council to the community on the meetings that were attended.) J. CITY ATTORNEY ITEMS K. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING L. ADJOURNMENT CERTIFICATION I, Linda A. Troyan, MMC, City Clerk Services Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify under penalty of perjury that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on at least Seventy­Two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California and on the City's website.  LINDA A. TROYAN, MMC CITY CLERK SERVICES DIRECTOR If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's office at (909) 477­2700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired.  CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT “Our Vision is to build on our success as a world class community,to create an equitable,sustainable,and vibrant city,rich in opportunity for all to thrive.” Page 4 MayorL. Dennis MichaelMayor Pro TemLynne B. KennedyMembers of the CityCouncil:Ryan A. HutchisonKristine D. ScottSam Spagnolo AMENDED AGENDA(ITEMS F3 AND F4 UPDATED TO REFLECT APN’s 1/14/2022 1:00PM)CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGAREGULAR MEETING AGENDAJanuary 19, 202210500 Civic Center DriveRancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARD – CITY COUNCILHOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY­ SUCCESSOR AGENCY – PUBLICFINANCE AUTHORITYCLOSED SESSION TRI­COMMUNITIES ROOM 4:30 P.M.REGULAR MEETINGS        COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 P.M.The City Council meets regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m.in the Council Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive.  It Is the Intent to concludethe meeting by 10:00 p.m. unless extended by the concurrence of the City Council. Agendas, minutes, and recordings of meetings can be found at www.cityofrc.us or bycontacting the City Clerk's Office at 909­774­2023. Live Broadcast available on Channel 3(RCTV­3).In accordance with AB 361, and to ensure the health and safety of our residents by limitingcontact that could spread the COVID–19 virus, members of the public have the option toparticipate in this City Council/Fire District meeting via a teleconference. Members of thepublic may also attend the meeting in person.  Those wishing to speak during publiccommunication may call at the start of the meeting by dialing (909)774­2751, if speakingon a Public Hearing item, please dial in when the Public Hearing is being heard at(909)774­2751 to be added to the queue for public comment. Calls will be answered in theorder received.  Members of the public are encouraged to watch from the safety of theirhomes by Live Streaming on the City's website at https://www.cityofrc.us/your­government/city­council­agendas or Local Cable: RCTV­3 Programming.  The City ofRancho Cucamonga thanks you in advance for taking all precautions to prevent spreadingthe COVID­19 virus.CLOSED SESSION – 4:30 P.M.  TRI­COMMUNITIES ROOM ROLL CALL: Mayor Michael                        Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy                        Council Members Hutchison, Scott, and Spagnolo A. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)C. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTSD. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSIOND1.CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR ROBERT NEIUBER, HUMAN RESOURCESDIRECTOR PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54954.2 REGARDING LABOR NEGOTIATIONSWITH THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY EMPLOYEES’ ASSOCIATION (RCCEA), TEAMSTERSLOCAL 1932, RANCHO CUCAMONGA MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENTGROUP – (CITY/FIRE)D2.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL ANTICIPATED LITIGATION: INITIATION OF LITIGATIONPURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.9: 2 CASES – (CITY)D3.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL ANTICIPATED LITIGATION: INITIATION OF LITIGATIONPURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.9: 1 CASE – (FIRE) D4.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH(1)OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: PEPE’S INC. V. CITY OF RANCHOCUCAMONGA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, CASENO. 5:20CV02506JGBSP – (CITY)D5.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH(1)OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: HIMNEL USA, INC. d/b/a ST. MARY'SMONTESSORI SCHOOL AND GLOBAL PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLC VS. CITY OF RANCHOCUCAMONGA, SBSC CASE NO.: CIVDS 2014554. – (CITY)D6.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH(1) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHOCUCAMONGA V. DR LANDMARK, INC.; POWER MEDIC TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; HOFERPROPERTIES, LLC; AND DOES 1 THROUGH 5 INCLUSIVE, SBSC CASE NO.: CIVDS 1904713 –(CITY)D7.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE TERMINUS OF SMOKESTONE STREET, EAST OFTORREY PINE COURT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 91739, IDENTIFIED AS COUNTYASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBER 0228­044­24, NEGOTIATING PARTIES JOHN GILLISON, CITYMANAGER REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND CHAO PING YANG;REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS. – (CITY)D8.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8949 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED ASSAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229­162­22; NEGOTIATINGPARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND OVERLAND, PACIFIC AND CUTLER,REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON,OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATINGPARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – (CITY)D9.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8783 ETIWANDA AVENUE/12949 WHITTRAM AVENUE,FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER0229­162­14; NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND OVERLAND,PACIFIC, AND CUTLER, REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND KULARTRUCK LINE, INC., OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNINGPRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTHABOVE. – (CITY)D10.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 9333 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED ASSAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229­162­23; NEGOTIATINGPARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND OVERLAND, PACIFIC AND CUTLER,REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON,OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATINGPARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – (CITY)D11.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8768 AND 8822 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHERIDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229­131­15,­16, AND ­26; NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND KELLY DEWITT,OVERLAND, PACIFIC, AND CUTLER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,AND SCG/DP ETIWANDA LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, OWNER;REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIESMAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – (CITY)D12.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8996 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED ASSAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229­283­79; NEGOTIATINGPARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND KELLY DEWITT, OVERLAND, PACIFIC ANDCUTLER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND BTC III RANCHOCUCAMONGA LOGISTICS CENTER LP, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, OWNER;REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIESMAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – (CITY)D13.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8821 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED ASSAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229­162­15; NEGOTIATINGPARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND KELLY DEWITT, OVERLAND, PACIFIC ANDCUTLER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND WILLIAM A. JONES ANDJOAN F. JONES, TRUSTEES OF THE JONES FAMILY TRUST OF 2010, AS TO AN UNDIVIDEDONETHIRD (1/3) INTEREST, AND JAMES ROY GARNESS AND RHONDA ANN GARNESS,UNDIVIDED ONETHIRD (1/3) INTEREST, AND JAMES ROY GARNESS AND RHONDA ANNGARNESS, TRUSTEES OF THE GARNESS FAMILY TRUST DATED JUNE 28, 2012, AS TO ANUNDIVIDED ONETHIRD (1/3) INTEREST, AND JOHN S. CLEMONS AND PATRICIA R. CLEMONS,TRUSTEES OF THE CLEMONS REVOCABLE TRUST DATED DECEMBER 4, 2014, AS TO ANUNDIVIDED ONETHIRD (1/3) INTEREST, AS TENANTS IN COMMON, OWNER; REGARDINGINSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAYNEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – (CITY)D14.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 12521 ARROW ROUTE AND 8688 ETIWANDA AVENUE,FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER0229­131­30 AND ­31; NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND KELLYDEWITT, OVERLAND, PACIFIC, AND CUTLER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHOCUCAMONGA, AND GOODMAN RANCHO SPE LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY,OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATINGPARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – (CITY)D15.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8889 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED ASSAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229­291­17 and ­18;NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND KELLY DEWITT, OVERLAND,PACIFIC, AND CUTLER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND LIGHTNINGP.M. LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONSTO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THEPROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – (CITY)D16.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8685 TO 8821 ETIWANDA AVENUE AND 12928 TO 12974WHITTRAM AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'SPARCEL NUMBER 0229­151­15 AND ­28, 0229­161­01, ­02, ­03, ­04, 05, ­19, AND ­20;NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND KELLY DEWITT, OVERLAND,PACIFIC, AND CUTLER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ANDCOLOMBERO FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TONEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THEPROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – (CITY)D17.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8939 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED ASSAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229­291­55; NEGOTIATINGPARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND KELLY DEWITT, OVERLAND, PACIFIC, ANDCUTLER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND BCORE IE WESTOWNER LLC, OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE.NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTHABOVE. – (CITY)D18.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 12467 BASE LINE ROAD IDENTIFIED AS PARCELNUMBERS 1090331030000, 1090331040000, 1089581040000; NEGOTIATING PARTIES JOHNGILLISON, CITY MANAGER REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ANDJOSEPH FILIPPI, JOSEPH FILIPPI WINERY AND VINEYARDS; REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS.– (CITY)E. RECESS – Closed Session to Recess to the Regular City Council Meeting at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers at City Hall, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. REGULAR MEETING – 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL:Mayor Michael Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy Council Members Hutchison, Scott, and Spagnolo A. AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDA B. ANNOUNCEMENT / PRESENTATIONS C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS Members of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, and Public Finance Authority. This is the time and place for the general public to address the Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Council on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Mayor, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Fire Board, Agencies, Successor Agency, Authority Board, or City Council not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of the business portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topic contained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for these business items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of the agenda commences. Any other public communications which have not concluded during this one hour period may resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed. CONSENT CALENDARS: The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and noncontroversial. They will be acted upon without discussion unless an item is removed by Council Member for discussion. Members of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, and Public Finance Authority and may act on the consent calendar for those bodies as part of a single motion with the City Council consent calendar. D. CONSENT CALENDAR D1.Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Bi­Weekly Payroll in the Total Amount of $1,822,002.63 and City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers (Excluding Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company) in the Total Amount of $1,956,777.89 Dated December 17, 2021 Through December 30, 2021 and City and Fire District Electronic Debit Registers for the Month of December in the Total Amount of $1,563,074.46. (CITY/FIRE) D2.Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers for Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company in the Total Amount of $1,092.38 Dated December 17, 2021 Through December 30, 2021. (CITY/FIRE) D3.Consideration to Receive and File Current Investment Schedules as of December 31, 2021 for the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. (CITY/FIRE) D4.Consideration to Accept as Complete, File the Notice of Completion, and Authorize Release of Retention and Bonds for the Fiscal Year 2021/22 Local Slurry Seal Pavement Rehabilitation Project ­ Contract No. 2021­120. (CITY) D5.Consideration to Accept the Parks Painting Project FY 20­21 (CO# 2021­077) as Complete, File the Notice of Completion, and Authorize Release of Retention and Bonds. (CITY) D6.Consideration to Issue a Purchase Order for the Purchase of Fiber Optic Equipment from Calix, Inc. in the Amount of $100,000 and an Appropriation in the Amount of $150,000. (CITY) D7.Consideration of Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement with Kosmont & Associates, Inc., for Services Related to the Formation of an Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District (EIFD). (CITY) D8.Consideration of the Improvement Agreement and Improvement Securities for Street Improvements, Order Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 9, Street Light Maintenance Districts Nos. 1 and 8 for Case No. DRC2014­01130, Located at the Northwest Corner of Foothill Blvd. and East Avenue. (RESOLUTION NO. 2022­017) (RESOLUTION NO. 2022­018), (RESOLUTION NO. 2022­019) (CITY) D9.Consideration of a Resolution Authorizing Submittal of Applications for All CalRecycle Grant and Payment Programs for which the City of Rancho Cucamonga is Eligible. (RESOLUTION NO. 2022­020) (CITY) D10.Consideration of a Resolution Approving an Amendment to the Rancho Cucamonga Management Association and Part Time City Positions Salary Schedules for Fiscal Year 2021­ 2022. (RESOLUTION NO. 2022­021) (CITY) E. CONSENT CALENDAR ORDINANCE(S) ­ SECOND READING/ADOPTION E1.Consideration of Second Reading and Adoption of the Following: ORDINANCE NO. 992 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONSENTING TO ANNEXATION DRC2020­00185 AND APPROVING PREZONING DRC2020­00186 IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF TWO NEW INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS TOTALING APPROXIMATELY 655,878 SQUARE FEET ON AN APPROXIMATE 35­ACRE PROJECT SITE LOCATED AT ETIWANDA AVENUE NORTH OF NAPA STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF – APNs: 0229­291­23, 46 AND 54 ORDINANCE NO. 993 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2021­00175 BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND HILLWOOD ENTERPRISES, L.P., TO FACILITATE THE DEVELOPMENT OF TWO NEW INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS TOTALING APPROXIMATELY 655,878 SQUARE FEET ON AN APPROXIMATE 35­ACRE PROJECT SITE LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 650 FEET EAST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE AND NORTH OF NAPA STREET; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF – APN: 0229­291­46 AND 54 F. ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING ITEM(S) F1.Consideration of First Reading of Ordinance No. 995, to be Read by Title Only and Waive Further Reading, Amending Chapter 3.40 Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to Confirm That Short­Term Rentals are Subject to the City’s Transient Occupancy Tax, Further Clarify the Definition of Hotel and Transient Under the Chapter, Provide Regulations for Filing and Appeals Procedures, and Make Other Minor Amendments to the Chapter. (ORDINANCE NO. 995) (CITY) F2.Discussion, Consideration and Possible Action to Introduce, Waive Reading of and Adopt by a Four­ fifths Vote, for a Period of 45 Days, an Urgency Ordinance to Establish Objective Zoning And Subdivision Standards for Senate Bill 9 Projects in Single­Family Residential Zones, Declaring The Urgency Thereof and Making a Determination of Exemption Under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). (URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. 994) (CITY) F3.Consideration of a Resolution of Necessity for the Acquisition by Eminent Domain of Certain Real Property Interests for Public Purposes in Connection with the Phase 1, Segment 2, San Sevaine Trail Project, A Joint Agency Project with the City of Fontana (Chao Ping Yan, Terminus of Smokestone Street, East of Torrey Pine Court, San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Number 0228­044­ 24). (RESOLUTION NO. 2022­007) (CITY) F4.Consideration of Resolutions of Necessity of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Declaring Certain Real Property Interests Necessary for Public Purposes and Authorizing the Acquisition Thereof in Connection with the City’s Etiwanda Grade Separation Project (Kular Truck Line, Inc., 8783 Etiwanda Avenue and 12949 Whittram Avenue, San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Number 0229­ 162­14; Lightning PM, LLC, 8889 Etiwanda Avenue, San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 0229­291­17 & 18; SCG of DP Etiwanda, LLC, 8768 & 8822 Etiwanda Avenue, San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 0229­131­15, 16 & 26; Jones Family Trust, Garness Family Trust, & Clemons Revocable Trust, 8821 Etiwanda Avenue, San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Number 0229­162­15; Goodman Rancho SPE, LLC, 12521 Arrow Route and 8688 Etiwanda Avenue, San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 0229­131­30 & 31; BTC III Rancho Cucamonga Logistics Center, LP, 8996 Etiwanda Avenue, San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Number 0229­283­79; BCORE IE West Owner, LLC, 8939 Etiwanda Avenue, San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Number 0229­291­55; Southern California Edison Company, 8949 Etiwanda Avenue, San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Number 0229­291­ 22; Colombero Family Limited Partnership, 8685 ­ 8821 Etiwanda Avenue and 12928 ­ 12974 Whittram Avenue, San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 0229­151­15 & 28 and 0229­161­01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 19 & 20).  (RESOLUTION NOS. 2022­008, 2022­009, 2022­010, 2022­ 011, 2022­012, 2022­013, 2022­014, 2022­015, 2022­016) (CITY). G. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM(S) ­ CITY/FIRE DISTRICT G1.8:00 PM Time Certain: Public Hearing #3 ­ Consideration of City Council District Boundaries, to Include Review of the Demographer’s Preliminary Analysis; Review of the Public Mapping Tool and Inviting the Community to Submit Maps; Review of Staff’s Presentation of Maps Prepared Using the Discussed Criteria; and Receipt of Public Input on Communities of Interest and Potential District Boundaries. (CITY) H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORT(S) H1.Consideration of an Agreement with SDI Presence LLC for Enterprise Resource Planning Software Consulting Services and Authorizing an Appropriation in the Amount of $270,000. (CITY) I. COUNCIL BUSINESS I1.COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Council Member.) I2.INTER​AGENCY UPDATES (Update by the City Council to the community on the meetings that were attended.) J. CITY ATTORNEY ITEMS K. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING L. ADJOURNMENT CERTIFICATION I, Linda A. Troyan, MMC, City Clerk Services Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify under penalty of perjury that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on at least Seventy­Two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California and on the City's website.  LINDA A. TROYAN, MMC CITY CLERK SERVICES DIRECTOR If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's office at (909) 477­2700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired.  CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT “Our Vision is to build on our success as a world class community,to create an equitable,sustainable,and vibrant city,rich in opportunity for all to thrive.” Page 5 MayorL. Dennis MichaelMayor Pro TemLynne B. KennedyMembers of the CityCouncil:Ryan A. HutchisonKristine D. ScottSam Spagnolo AMENDED AGENDA(ITEMS F3 AND F4 UPDATED TO REFLECT APN’s 1/14/2022 1:00PM)CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGAREGULAR MEETING AGENDAJanuary 19, 202210500 Civic Center DriveRancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARD – CITY COUNCILHOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY­ SUCCESSOR AGENCY – PUBLICFINANCE AUTHORITYCLOSED SESSION TRI­COMMUNITIES ROOM 4:30 P.M.REGULAR MEETINGS        COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 P.M.The City Council meets regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m.in the Council Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive.  It Is the Intent to concludethe meeting by 10:00 p.m. unless extended by the concurrence of the City Council. Agendas, minutes, and recordings of meetings can be found at www.cityofrc.us or bycontacting the City Clerk's Office at 909­774­2023. Live Broadcast available on Channel 3(RCTV­3).In accordance with AB 361, and to ensure the health and safety of our residents by limitingcontact that could spread the COVID–19 virus, members of the public have the option toparticipate in this City Council/Fire District meeting via a teleconference. Members of thepublic may also attend the meeting in person.  Those wishing to speak during publiccommunication may call at the start of the meeting by dialing (909)774­2751, if speakingon a Public Hearing item, please dial in when the Public Hearing is being heard at(909)774­2751 to be added to the queue for public comment. Calls will be answered in theorder received.  Members of the public are encouraged to watch from the safety of theirhomes by Live Streaming on the City's website at https://www.cityofrc.us/your­government/city­council­agendas or Local Cable: RCTV­3 Programming.  The City ofRancho Cucamonga thanks you in advance for taking all precautions to prevent spreadingthe COVID­19 virus.CLOSED SESSION – 4:30 P.M.  TRI­COMMUNITIES ROOM ROLL CALL: Mayor Michael                        Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy                        Council Members Hutchison, Scott, and Spagnolo A. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)C. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTSD. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSIOND1.CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR ROBERT NEIUBER, HUMAN RESOURCESDIRECTOR PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54954.2 REGARDING LABOR NEGOTIATIONSWITH THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY EMPLOYEES’ ASSOCIATION (RCCEA), TEAMSTERSLOCAL 1932, RANCHO CUCAMONGA MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENTGROUP – (CITY/FIRE)D2.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL ANTICIPATED LITIGATION: INITIATION OF LITIGATIONPURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.9: 2 CASES – (CITY)D3.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL ANTICIPATED LITIGATION: INITIATION OF LITIGATIONPURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.9: 1 CASE – (FIRE) D4.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH(1)OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: PEPE’S INC. V. CITY OF RANCHOCUCAMONGA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, CASENO. 5:20CV02506JGBSP – (CITY)D5.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH(1)OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: HIMNEL USA, INC. d/b/a ST. MARY'SMONTESSORI SCHOOL AND GLOBAL PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLC VS. CITY OF RANCHOCUCAMONGA, SBSC CASE NO.: CIVDS 2014554. – (CITY)D6.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH(1) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHOCUCAMONGA V. DR LANDMARK, INC.; POWER MEDIC TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; HOFERPROPERTIES, LLC; AND DOES 1 THROUGH 5 INCLUSIVE, SBSC CASE NO.: CIVDS 1904713 –(CITY)D7.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE TERMINUS OF SMOKESTONE STREET, EAST OFTORREY PINE COURT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 91739, IDENTIFIED AS COUNTYASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBER 0228­044­24, NEGOTIATING PARTIES JOHN GILLISON, CITYMANAGER REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND CHAO PING YANG;REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS. – (CITY)D8.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8949 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED ASSAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229­162­22; NEGOTIATINGPARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND OVERLAND, PACIFIC AND CUTLER,REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON,OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATINGPARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – (CITY)D9.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8783 ETIWANDA AVENUE/12949 WHITTRAM AVENUE,FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER0229­162­14; NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND OVERLAND,PACIFIC, AND CUTLER, REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND KULARTRUCK LINE, INC., OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNINGPRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTHABOVE. – (CITY)D10.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 9333 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED ASSAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229­162­23; NEGOTIATINGPARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND OVERLAND, PACIFIC AND CUTLER,REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON,OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATINGPARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – (CITY)D11.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8768 AND 8822 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHERIDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229­131­15,­16, AND ­26; NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND KELLY DEWITT,OVERLAND, PACIFIC, AND CUTLER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,AND SCG/DP ETIWANDA LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, OWNER;REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIESMAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – (CITY)D12.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8996 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED ASSAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229­283­79; NEGOTIATINGPARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND KELLY DEWITT, OVERLAND, PACIFIC ANDCUTLER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND BTC III RANCHOCUCAMONGA LOGISTICS CENTER LP, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, OWNER;REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIESMAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – (CITY)D13.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8821 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED ASSAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229­162­15; NEGOTIATINGPARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND KELLY DEWITT, OVERLAND, PACIFIC ANDCUTLER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND WILLIAM A. JONES ANDJOAN F. JONES, TRUSTEES OF THE JONES FAMILY TRUST OF 2010, AS TO AN UNDIVIDEDONETHIRD (1/3) INTEREST, AND JAMES ROY GARNESS AND RHONDA ANN GARNESS,UNDIVIDED ONETHIRD (1/3) INTEREST, AND JAMES ROY GARNESS AND RHONDA ANNGARNESS, TRUSTEES OF THE GARNESS FAMILY TRUST DATED JUNE 28, 2012, AS TO ANUNDIVIDED ONETHIRD (1/3) INTEREST, AND JOHN S. CLEMONS AND PATRICIA R. CLEMONS,TRUSTEES OF THE CLEMONS REVOCABLE TRUST DATED DECEMBER 4, 2014, AS TO ANUNDIVIDED ONETHIRD (1/3) INTEREST, AS TENANTS IN COMMON, OWNER; REGARDINGINSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAYNEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – (CITY)D14.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 12521 ARROW ROUTE AND 8688 ETIWANDA AVENUE,FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER0229­131­30 AND ­31; NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND KELLYDEWITT, OVERLAND, PACIFIC, AND CUTLER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHOCUCAMONGA, AND GOODMAN RANCHO SPE LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY,OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATINGPARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – (CITY)D15.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8889 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED ASSAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229­291­17 and ­18;NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND KELLY DEWITT, OVERLAND,PACIFIC, AND CUTLER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND LIGHTNINGP.M. LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONSTO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THEPROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – (CITY)D16.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8685 TO 8821 ETIWANDA AVENUE AND 12928 TO 12974WHITTRAM AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'SPARCEL NUMBER 0229­151­15 AND ­28, 0229­161­01, ­02, ­03, ­04, 05, ­19, AND ­20;NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND KELLY DEWITT, OVERLAND,PACIFIC, AND CUTLER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ANDCOLOMBERO FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TONEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THEPROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – (CITY)D17.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8939 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED ASSAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229­291­55; NEGOTIATINGPARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND KELLY DEWITT, OVERLAND, PACIFIC, ANDCUTLER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND BCORE IE WESTOWNER LLC, OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE.NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTHABOVE. – (CITY)D18.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 12467 BASE LINE ROAD IDENTIFIED AS PARCELNUMBERS 1090331030000, 1090331040000, 1089581040000; NEGOTIATING PARTIES JOHNGILLISON, CITY MANAGER REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ANDJOSEPH FILIPPI, JOSEPH FILIPPI WINERY AND VINEYARDS; REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS.– (CITY)E. RECESS – Closed Session to Recess to the Regular City Council Meeting at 7:00 P.M. in the CouncilChambers at City Hall, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California.REGULAR MEETING – 7:00 P.M.COUNCIL CHAMBERSPLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCEROLL CALL:Mayor MichaelMayor Pro Tem KennedyCouncil Members Hutchison, Scott, and SpagnoloA. AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDAB. ANNOUNCEMENT / PRESENTATIONSC. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONSMembers of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, SuccessorAgency, and Public Finance Authority. This is the time and place for the general public to addressthe Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public FinancingAuthority Board, and City Council on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits theFire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board,and City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Fire ProtectionDistrict, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Councilmay receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting.Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by theMayor, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to beaddressed directly to the Fire Board, Agencies, Successor Agency, Authority Board, or City Council not to themembers of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected.Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in anyactivity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting.The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of thebusiness portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topiccontained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for thesebusiness items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of theagenda commences. Any other public communications which have not concluded during this one hour periodmay resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed.CONSENT CALENDARS:The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and noncontroversial. They will be actedupon without discussion unless an item is removed by Council Member for discussion.Members of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, andPublic Finance Authority and may act on the consent calendar for those bodies as part of a single motion withthe City Council consent calendar. D. CONSENT CALENDAR D1.Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Bi­Weekly Payroll in the Total Amount of $1,822,002.63 and City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers (Excluding Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company) in the Total Amount of $1,956,777.89 Dated December 17, 2021 Through December 30, 2021 and City and Fire District Electronic Debit Registers for the Month of December in the Total Amount of $1,563,074.46. (CITY/FIRE) D2.Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers for Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company in the Total Amount of $1,092.38 Dated December 17, 2021 Through December 30, 2021. (CITY/FIRE) D3.Consideration to Receive and File Current Investment Schedules as of December 31, 2021 for the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. (CITY/FIRE) D4.Consideration to Accept as Complete, File the Notice of Completion, and Authorize Release of Retention and Bonds for the Fiscal Year 2021/22 Local Slurry Seal Pavement Rehabilitation Project ­ Contract No. 2021­120. (CITY) D5.Consideration to Accept the Parks Painting Project FY 20­21 (CO# 2021­077) as Complete, File the Notice of Completion, and Authorize Release of Retention and Bonds. (CITY) D6.Consideration to Issue a Purchase Order for the Purchase of Fiber Optic Equipment from Calix, Inc. in the Amount of $100,000 and an Appropriation in the Amount of $150,000. (CITY) D7.Consideration of Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement with Kosmont & Associates, Inc., for Services Related to the Formation of an Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District (EIFD). (CITY) D8.Consideration of the Improvement Agreement and Improvement Securities for Street Improvements, Order Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 9, Street Light Maintenance Districts Nos. 1 and 8 for Case No. DRC2014­01130, Located at the Northwest Corner of Foothill Blvd. and East Avenue. (RESOLUTION NO. 2022­017) (RESOLUTION NO. 2022­018), (RESOLUTION NO. 2022­019) (CITY) D9.Consideration of a Resolution Authorizing Submittal of Applications for All CalRecycle Grant and Payment Programs for which the City of Rancho Cucamonga is Eligible. (RESOLUTION NO. 2022­020) (CITY) D10.Consideration of a Resolution Approving an Amendment to the Rancho Cucamonga Management Association and Part Time City Positions Salary Schedules for Fiscal Year 2021­ 2022. (RESOLUTION NO. 2022­021) (CITY) E. CONSENT CALENDAR ORDINANCE(S) ­ SECOND READING/ADOPTION E1.Consideration of Second Reading and Adoption of the Following: ORDINANCE NO. 992 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONSENTING TO ANNEXATION DRC2020­00185 AND APPROVING PREZONING DRC2020­00186 IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF TWO NEW INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS TOTALING APPROXIMATELY 655,878 SQUARE FEET ON AN APPROXIMATE 35­ACRE PROJECT SITE LOCATED AT ETIWANDA AVENUE NORTH OF NAPA STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF – APNs: 0229­291­23, 46 AND 54 ORDINANCE NO. 993 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2021­00175 BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND HILLWOOD ENTERPRISES, L.P., TO FACILITATE THE DEVELOPMENT OF TWO NEW INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS TOTALING APPROXIMATELY 655,878 SQUARE FEET ON AN APPROXIMATE 35­ACRE PROJECT SITE LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 650 FEET EAST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE AND NORTH OF NAPA STREET; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF – APN: 0229­291­46 AND 54 F. ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING ITEM(S) F1.Consideration of First Reading of Ordinance No. 995, to be Read by Title Only and Waive Further Reading, Amending Chapter 3.40 Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to Confirm That Short­Term Rentals are Subject to the City’s Transient Occupancy Tax, Further Clarify the Definition of Hotel and Transient Under the Chapter, Provide Regulations for Filing and Appeals Procedures, and Make Other Minor Amendments to the Chapter. (ORDINANCE NO. 995) (CITY) F2.Discussion, Consideration and Possible Action to Introduce, Waive Reading of and Adopt by a Four­ fifths Vote, for a Period of 45 Days, an Urgency Ordinance to Establish Objective Zoning And Subdivision Standards for Senate Bill 9 Projects in Single­Family Residential Zones, Declaring The Urgency Thereof and Making a Determination of Exemption Under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). (URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. 994) (CITY) F3.Consideration of a Resolution of Necessity for the Acquisition by Eminent Domain of Certain Real Property Interests for Public Purposes in Connection with the Phase 1, Segment 2, San Sevaine Trail Project, A Joint Agency Project with the City of Fontana (Chao Ping Yan, Terminus of Smokestone Street, East of Torrey Pine Court, San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Number 0228­044­ 24). (RESOLUTION NO. 2022­007) (CITY) F4.Consideration of Resolutions of Necessity of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Declaring Certain Real Property Interests Necessary for Public Purposes and Authorizing the Acquisition Thereof in Connection with the City’s Etiwanda Grade Separation Project (Kular Truck Line, Inc., 8783 Etiwanda Avenue and 12949 Whittram Avenue, San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Number 0229­ 162­14; Lightning PM, LLC, 8889 Etiwanda Avenue, San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 0229­291­17 & 18; SCG of DP Etiwanda, LLC, 8768 & 8822 Etiwanda Avenue, San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 0229­131­15, 16 & 26; Jones Family Trust, Garness Family Trust, & Clemons Revocable Trust, 8821 Etiwanda Avenue, San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Number 0229­162­15; Goodman Rancho SPE, LLC, 12521 Arrow Route and 8688 Etiwanda Avenue, San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 0229­131­30 & 31; BTC III Rancho Cucamonga Logistics Center, LP, 8996 Etiwanda Avenue, San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Number 0229­283­79; BCORE IE West Owner, LLC, 8939 Etiwanda Avenue, San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Number 0229­291­55; Southern California Edison Company, 8949 Etiwanda Avenue, San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Number 0229­291­ 22; Colombero Family Limited Partnership, 8685 ­ 8821 Etiwanda Avenue and 12928 ­ 12974 Whittram Avenue, San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 0229­151­15 & 28 and 0229­161­01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 19 & 20).  (RESOLUTION NOS. 2022­008, 2022­009, 2022­010, 2022­ 011, 2022­012, 2022­013, 2022­014, 2022­015, 2022­016) (CITY). G. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM(S) ­ CITY/FIRE DISTRICT G1.8:00 PM Time Certain: Public Hearing #3 ­ Consideration of City Council District Boundaries, to Include Review of the Demographer’s Preliminary Analysis; Review of the Public Mapping Tool and Inviting the Community to Submit Maps; Review of Staff’s Presentation of Maps Prepared Using the Discussed Criteria; and Receipt of Public Input on Communities of Interest and Potential District Boundaries. (CITY) H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORT(S) H1.Consideration of an Agreement with SDI Presence LLC for Enterprise Resource Planning Software Consulting Services and Authorizing an Appropriation in the Amount of $270,000. (CITY) I. COUNCIL BUSINESS I1.COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Council Member.) I2.INTER​AGENCY UPDATES (Update by the City Council to the community on the meetings that were attended.) J. CITY ATTORNEY ITEMS K. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING L. ADJOURNMENT CERTIFICATION I, Linda A. Troyan, MMC, City Clerk Services Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify under penalty of perjury that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on at least Seventy­Two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California and on the City's website.  LINDA A. TROYAN, MMC CITY CLERK SERVICES DIRECTOR If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's office at (909) 477­2700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired.  CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT “Our Vision is to build on our success as a world class community,to create an equitable,sustainable,and vibrant city,rich in opportunity for all to thrive.” Page 6 MayorL. Dennis MichaelMayor Pro TemLynne B. KennedyMembers of the CityCouncil:Ryan A. HutchisonKristine D. ScottSam Spagnolo AMENDED AGENDA(ITEMS F3 AND F4 UPDATED TO REFLECT APN’s 1/14/2022 1:00PM)CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGAREGULAR MEETING AGENDAJanuary 19, 202210500 Civic Center DriveRancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARD – CITY COUNCILHOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY­ SUCCESSOR AGENCY – PUBLICFINANCE AUTHORITYCLOSED SESSION TRI­COMMUNITIES ROOM 4:30 P.M.REGULAR MEETINGS        COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 P.M.The City Council meets regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m.in the Council Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive.  It Is the Intent to concludethe meeting by 10:00 p.m. unless extended by the concurrence of the City Council. Agendas, minutes, and recordings of meetings can be found at www.cityofrc.us or bycontacting the City Clerk's Office at 909­774­2023. Live Broadcast available on Channel 3(RCTV­3).In accordance with AB 361, and to ensure the health and safety of our residents by limitingcontact that could spread the COVID–19 virus, members of the public have the option toparticipate in this City Council/Fire District meeting via a teleconference. Members of thepublic may also attend the meeting in person.  Those wishing to speak during publiccommunication may call at the start of the meeting by dialing (909)774­2751, if speakingon a Public Hearing item, please dial in when the Public Hearing is being heard at(909)774­2751 to be added to the queue for public comment. Calls will be answered in theorder received.  Members of the public are encouraged to watch from the safety of theirhomes by Live Streaming on the City's website at https://www.cityofrc.us/your­government/city­council­agendas or Local Cable: RCTV­3 Programming.  The City ofRancho Cucamonga thanks you in advance for taking all precautions to prevent spreadingthe COVID­19 virus.CLOSED SESSION – 4:30 P.M.  TRI­COMMUNITIES ROOM ROLL CALL: Mayor Michael                        Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy                        Council Members Hutchison, Scott, and Spagnolo A. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)C. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTSD. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSIOND1.CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR ROBERT NEIUBER, HUMAN RESOURCESDIRECTOR PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54954.2 REGARDING LABOR NEGOTIATIONSWITH THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY EMPLOYEES’ ASSOCIATION (RCCEA), TEAMSTERSLOCAL 1932, RANCHO CUCAMONGA MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENTGROUP – (CITY/FIRE)D2.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL ANTICIPATED LITIGATION: INITIATION OF LITIGATIONPURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.9: 2 CASES – (CITY)D3.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL ANTICIPATED LITIGATION: INITIATION OF LITIGATIONPURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.9: 1 CASE – (FIRE) D4.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH(1)OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: PEPE’S INC. V. CITY OF RANCHOCUCAMONGA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, CASENO. 5:20CV02506JGBSP – (CITY)D5.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH(1)OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: HIMNEL USA, INC. d/b/a ST. MARY'SMONTESSORI SCHOOL AND GLOBAL PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLC VS. CITY OF RANCHOCUCAMONGA, SBSC CASE NO.: CIVDS 2014554. – (CITY)D6.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH(1) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHOCUCAMONGA V. DR LANDMARK, INC.; POWER MEDIC TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; HOFERPROPERTIES, LLC; AND DOES 1 THROUGH 5 INCLUSIVE, SBSC CASE NO.: CIVDS 1904713 –(CITY)D7.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE TERMINUS OF SMOKESTONE STREET, EAST OFTORREY PINE COURT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 91739, IDENTIFIED AS COUNTYASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBER 0228­044­24, NEGOTIATING PARTIES JOHN GILLISON, CITYMANAGER REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND CHAO PING YANG;REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS. – (CITY)D8.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8949 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED ASSAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229­162­22; NEGOTIATINGPARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND OVERLAND, PACIFIC AND CUTLER,REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON,OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATINGPARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – (CITY)D9.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8783 ETIWANDA AVENUE/12949 WHITTRAM AVENUE,FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER0229­162­14; NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND OVERLAND,PACIFIC, AND CUTLER, REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND KULARTRUCK LINE, INC., OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNINGPRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTHABOVE. – (CITY)D10.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 9333 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED ASSAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229­162­23; NEGOTIATINGPARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND OVERLAND, PACIFIC AND CUTLER,REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON,OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATINGPARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – (CITY)D11.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8768 AND 8822 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHERIDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229­131­15,­16, AND ­26; NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND KELLY DEWITT,OVERLAND, PACIFIC, AND CUTLER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,AND SCG/DP ETIWANDA LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, OWNER;REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIESMAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – (CITY)D12.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8996 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED ASSAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229­283­79; NEGOTIATINGPARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND KELLY DEWITT, OVERLAND, PACIFIC ANDCUTLER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND BTC III RANCHOCUCAMONGA LOGISTICS CENTER LP, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, OWNER;REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIESMAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – (CITY)D13.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8821 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED ASSAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229­162­15; NEGOTIATINGPARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND KELLY DEWITT, OVERLAND, PACIFIC ANDCUTLER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND WILLIAM A. JONES ANDJOAN F. JONES, TRUSTEES OF THE JONES FAMILY TRUST OF 2010, AS TO AN UNDIVIDEDONETHIRD (1/3) INTEREST, AND JAMES ROY GARNESS AND RHONDA ANN GARNESS,UNDIVIDED ONETHIRD (1/3) INTEREST, AND JAMES ROY GARNESS AND RHONDA ANNGARNESS, TRUSTEES OF THE GARNESS FAMILY TRUST DATED JUNE 28, 2012, AS TO ANUNDIVIDED ONETHIRD (1/3) INTEREST, AND JOHN S. CLEMONS AND PATRICIA R. CLEMONS,TRUSTEES OF THE CLEMONS REVOCABLE TRUST DATED DECEMBER 4, 2014, AS TO ANUNDIVIDED ONETHIRD (1/3) INTEREST, AS TENANTS IN COMMON, OWNER; REGARDINGINSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAYNEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – (CITY)D14.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 12521 ARROW ROUTE AND 8688 ETIWANDA AVENUE,FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER0229­131­30 AND ­31; NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND KELLYDEWITT, OVERLAND, PACIFIC, AND CUTLER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHOCUCAMONGA, AND GOODMAN RANCHO SPE LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY,OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATINGPARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – (CITY)D15.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8889 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED ASSAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229­291­17 and ­18;NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND KELLY DEWITT, OVERLAND,PACIFIC, AND CUTLER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND LIGHTNINGP.M. LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONSTO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THEPROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – (CITY)D16.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8685 TO 8821 ETIWANDA AVENUE AND 12928 TO 12974WHITTRAM AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'SPARCEL NUMBER 0229­151­15 AND ­28, 0229­161­01, ­02, ­03, ­04, 05, ­19, AND ­20;NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND KELLY DEWITT, OVERLAND,PACIFIC, AND CUTLER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ANDCOLOMBERO FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TONEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THEPROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – (CITY)D17.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8939 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED ASSAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229­291­55; NEGOTIATINGPARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND KELLY DEWITT, OVERLAND, PACIFIC, ANDCUTLER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND BCORE IE WESTOWNER LLC, OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE.NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTHABOVE. – (CITY)D18.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 12467 BASE LINE ROAD IDENTIFIED AS PARCELNUMBERS 1090331030000, 1090331040000, 1089581040000; NEGOTIATING PARTIES JOHNGILLISON, CITY MANAGER REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ANDJOSEPH FILIPPI, JOSEPH FILIPPI WINERY AND VINEYARDS; REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS.– (CITY)E. RECESS – Closed Session to Recess to the Regular City Council Meeting at 7:00 P.M. in the CouncilChambers at City Hall, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California.REGULAR MEETING – 7:00 P.M.COUNCIL CHAMBERSPLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCEROLL CALL:Mayor MichaelMayor Pro Tem KennedyCouncil Members Hutchison, Scott, and SpagnoloA. AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDAB. ANNOUNCEMENT / PRESENTATIONSC. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONSMembers of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, SuccessorAgency, and Public Finance Authority. This is the time and place for the general public to addressthe Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public FinancingAuthority Board, and City Council on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits theFire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board,and City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Fire ProtectionDistrict, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Councilmay receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting.Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by theMayor, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to beaddressed directly to the Fire Board, Agencies, Successor Agency, Authority Board, or City Council not to themembers of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected.Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in anyactivity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting.The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of thebusiness portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topiccontained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for thesebusiness items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of theagenda commences. Any other public communications which have not concluded during this one hour periodmay resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed.CONSENT CALENDARS:The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and noncontroversial. They will be actedupon without discussion unless an item is removed by Council Member for discussion.Members of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, andPublic Finance Authority and may act on the consent calendar for those bodies as part of a single motion withthe City Council consent calendar.D. CONSENT CALENDARD1.Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Bi­Weekly Payroll in the Total Amount of$1,822,002.63 and City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers (Excluding Checks Issued toSouthern California Gas Company) in the Total Amount of $1,956,777.89 Dated December 17,2021 Through December 30, 2021 and City and Fire District Electronic Debit Registers for theMonth of December in the Total Amount of $1,563,074.46. (CITY/FIRE)D2.Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers for Checks Issued toSouthern California Gas Company in the Total Amount of $1,092.38 Dated December 17, 2021Through December 30, 2021. (CITY/FIRE)D3.Consideration to Receive and File Current Investment Schedules as of December 31, 2021 forthe City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District.(CITY/FIRE)D4.Consideration to Accept as Complete, File the Notice of Completion, and Authorize Release ofRetention and Bonds for the Fiscal Year 2021/22 Local Slurry Seal Pavement RehabilitationProject ­ Contract No. 2021­120. (CITY)D5.Consideration to Accept the Parks Painting Project FY 20­21 (CO# 2021­077) as Complete,File the Notice of Completion, and Authorize Release of Retention and Bonds. (CITY)D6.Consideration to Issue a Purchase Order for the Purchase of Fiber Optic Equipment from Calix,Inc. in the Amount of $100,000 and an Appropriation in the Amount of $150,000. (CITY)D7.Consideration of Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement with Kosmont & Associates, Inc., forServices Related to the Formation of an Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District (EIFD).(CITY)D8.Consideration of the Improvement Agreement and Improvement Securities for StreetImprovements, Order Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 9, Street LightMaintenance Districts Nos. 1 and 8 for Case No. DRC2014­01130, Located at the NorthwestCorner of Foothill Blvd. and East Avenue. (RESOLUTION NO. 2022­017) (RESOLUTION NO.2022­018), (RESOLUTION NO. 2022­019) (CITY)D9.Consideration of a Resolution Authorizing Submittal of Applications for All CalRecycle Grantand Payment Programs for which the City of Rancho Cucamonga is Eligible. (RESOLUTIONNO. 2022­020) (CITY)D10.Consideration of a Resolution Approving an Amendment to the Rancho Cucamonga Management Association and Part Time City Positions Salary Schedules for Fiscal Year 2021­ 2022. (RESOLUTION NO. 2022­021) (CITY) E. CONSENT CALENDAR ORDINANCE(S) ­ SECOND READING/ADOPTION E1.Consideration of Second Reading and Adoption of the Following: ORDINANCE NO. 992 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONSENTING TO ANNEXATION DRC2020­00185 AND APPROVING PREZONING DRC2020­00186 IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF TWO NEW INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS TOTALING APPROXIMATELY 655,878 SQUARE FEET ON AN APPROXIMATE 35­ACRE PROJECT SITE LOCATED AT ETIWANDA AVENUE NORTH OF NAPA STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF – APNs: 0229­291­23, 46 AND 54 ORDINANCE NO. 993 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2021­00175 BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND HILLWOOD ENTERPRISES, L.P., TO FACILITATE THE DEVELOPMENT OF TWO NEW INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS TOTALING APPROXIMATELY 655,878 SQUARE FEET ON AN APPROXIMATE 35­ACRE PROJECT SITE LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 650 FEET EAST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE AND NORTH OF NAPA STREET; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF – APN: 0229­291­46 AND 54 F. ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING ITEM(S) F1.Consideration of First Reading of Ordinance No. 995, to be Read by Title Only and Waive Further Reading, Amending Chapter 3.40 Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to Confirm That Short­Term Rentals are Subject to the City’s Transient Occupancy Tax, Further Clarify the Definition of Hotel and Transient Under the Chapter, Provide Regulations for Filing and Appeals Procedures, and Make Other Minor Amendments to the Chapter. (ORDINANCE NO. 995) (CITY) F2.Discussion, Consideration and Possible Action to Introduce, Waive Reading of and Adopt by a Four­ fifths Vote, for a Period of 45 Days, an Urgency Ordinance to Establish Objective Zoning And Subdivision Standards for Senate Bill 9 Projects in Single­Family Residential Zones, Declaring The Urgency Thereof and Making a Determination of Exemption Under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). (URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. 994) (CITY) F3.Consideration of a Resolution of Necessity for the Acquisition by Eminent Domain of Certain Real Property Interests for Public Purposes in Connection with the Phase 1, Segment 2, San Sevaine Trail Project, A Joint Agency Project with the City of Fontana (Chao Ping Yan, Terminus of Smokestone Street, East of Torrey Pine Court, San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Number 0228­044­ 24). (RESOLUTION NO. 2022­007) (CITY) F4.Consideration of Resolutions of Necessity of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Declaring Certain Real Property Interests Necessary for Public Purposes and Authorizing the Acquisition Thereof in Connection with the City’s Etiwanda Grade Separation Project (Kular Truck Line, Inc., 8783 Etiwanda Avenue and 12949 Whittram Avenue, San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Number 0229­ 162­14; Lightning PM, LLC, 8889 Etiwanda Avenue, San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 0229­291­17 & 18; SCG of DP Etiwanda, LLC, 8768 & 8822 Etiwanda Avenue, San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 0229­131­15, 16 & 26; Jones Family Trust, Garness Family Trust, & Clemons Revocable Trust, 8821 Etiwanda Avenue, San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Number 0229­162­15; Goodman Rancho SPE, LLC, 12521 Arrow Route and 8688 Etiwanda Avenue, San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 0229­131­30 & 31; BTC III Rancho Cucamonga Logistics Center, LP, 8996 Etiwanda Avenue, San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Number 0229­283­79; BCORE IE West Owner, LLC, 8939 Etiwanda Avenue, San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Number 0229­291­55; Southern California Edison Company, 8949 Etiwanda Avenue, San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Number 0229­291­ 22; Colombero Family Limited Partnership, 8685 ­ 8821 Etiwanda Avenue and 12928 ­ 12974 Whittram Avenue, San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 0229­151­15 & 28 and 0229­161­01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 19 & 20).  (RESOLUTION NOS. 2022­008, 2022­009, 2022­010, 2022­ 011, 2022­012, 2022­013, 2022­014, 2022­015, 2022­016) (CITY). G. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM(S) ­ CITY/FIRE DISTRICT G1.8:00 PM Time Certain: Public Hearing #3 ­ Consideration of City Council District Boundaries, to Include Review of the Demographer’s Preliminary Analysis; Review of the Public Mapping Tool and Inviting the Community to Submit Maps; Review of Staff’s Presentation of Maps Prepared Using the Discussed Criteria; and Receipt of Public Input on Communities of Interest and Potential District Boundaries. (CITY) H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORT(S) H1.Consideration of an Agreement with SDI Presence LLC for Enterprise Resource Planning Software Consulting Services and Authorizing an Appropriation in the Amount of $270,000. (CITY) I. COUNCIL BUSINESS I1.COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Council Member.) I2.INTER​AGENCY UPDATES (Update by the City Council to the community on the meetings that were attended.) J. CITY ATTORNEY ITEMS K. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING L. ADJOURNMENT CERTIFICATION I, Linda A. Troyan, MMC, City Clerk Services Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify under penalty of perjury that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on at least Seventy­Two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California and on the City's website.  LINDA A. TROYAN, MMC CITY CLERK SERVICES DIRECTOR If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's office at (909) 477­2700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired.  CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT “Our Vision is to build on our success as a world class community,to create an equitable,sustainable,and vibrant city,rich in opportunity for all to thrive.” Page 7 MayorL. Dennis MichaelMayor Pro TemLynne B. KennedyMembers of the CityCouncil:Ryan A. HutchisonKristine D. ScottSam Spagnolo AMENDED AGENDA(ITEMS F3 AND F4 UPDATED TO REFLECT APN’s 1/14/2022 1:00PM)CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGAREGULAR MEETING AGENDAJanuary 19, 202210500 Civic Center DriveRancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARD – CITY COUNCILHOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY­ SUCCESSOR AGENCY – PUBLICFINANCE AUTHORITYCLOSED SESSION TRI­COMMUNITIES ROOM 4:30 P.M.REGULAR MEETINGS        COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 P.M.The City Council meets regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m.in the Council Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive.  It Is the Intent to concludethe meeting by 10:00 p.m. unless extended by the concurrence of the City Council. Agendas, minutes, and recordings of meetings can be found at www.cityofrc.us or bycontacting the City Clerk's Office at 909­774­2023. Live Broadcast available on Channel 3(RCTV­3).In accordance with AB 361, and to ensure the health and safety of our residents by limitingcontact that could spread the COVID–19 virus, members of the public have the option toparticipate in this City Council/Fire District meeting via a teleconference. Members of thepublic may also attend the meeting in person.  Those wishing to speak during publiccommunication may call at the start of the meeting by dialing (909)774­2751, if speakingon a Public Hearing item, please dial in when the Public Hearing is being heard at(909)774­2751 to be added to the queue for public comment. Calls will be answered in theorder received.  Members of the public are encouraged to watch from the safety of theirhomes by Live Streaming on the City's website at https://www.cityofrc.us/your­government/city­council­agendas or Local Cable: RCTV­3 Programming.  The City ofRancho Cucamonga thanks you in advance for taking all precautions to prevent spreadingthe COVID­19 virus.CLOSED SESSION – 4:30 P.M.  TRI­COMMUNITIES ROOM ROLL CALL: Mayor Michael                        Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy                        Council Members Hutchison, Scott, and Spagnolo A. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)C. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTSD. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSIOND1.CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR ROBERT NEIUBER, HUMAN RESOURCESDIRECTOR PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54954.2 REGARDING LABOR NEGOTIATIONSWITH THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY EMPLOYEES’ ASSOCIATION (RCCEA), TEAMSTERSLOCAL 1932, RANCHO CUCAMONGA MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENTGROUP – (CITY/FIRE)D2.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL ANTICIPATED LITIGATION: INITIATION OF LITIGATIONPURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.9: 2 CASES – (CITY)D3.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL ANTICIPATED LITIGATION: INITIATION OF LITIGATIONPURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.9: 1 CASE – (FIRE) D4.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH(1)OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: PEPE’S INC. V. CITY OF RANCHOCUCAMONGA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, CASENO. 5:20CV02506JGBSP – (CITY)D5.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH(1)OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: HIMNEL USA, INC. d/b/a ST. MARY'SMONTESSORI SCHOOL AND GLOBAL PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLC VS. CITY OF RANCHOCUCAMONGA, SBSC CASE NO.: CIVDS 2014554. – (CITY)D6.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH(1) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHOCUCAMONGA V. DR LANDMARK, INC.; POWER MEDIC TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; HOFERPROPERTIES, LLC; AND DOES 1 THROUGH 5 INCLUSIVE, SBSC CASE NO.: CIVDS 1904713 –(CITY)D7.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE TERMINUS OF SMOKESTONE STREET, EAST OFTORREY PINE COURT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 91739, IDENTIFIED AS COUNTYASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBER 0228­044­24, NEGOTIATING PARTIES JOHN GILLISON, CITYMANAGER REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND CHAO PING YANG;REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS. – (CITY)D8.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8949 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED ASSAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229­162­22; NEGOTIATINGPARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND OVERLAND, PACIFIC AND CUTLER,REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON,OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATINGPARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – (CITY)D9.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8783 ETIWANDA AVENUE/12949 WHITTRAM AVENUE,FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER0229­162­14; NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND OVERLAND,PACIFIC, AND CUTLER, REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND KULARTRUCK LINE, INC., OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNINGPRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTHABOVE. – (CITY)D10.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 9333 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED ASSAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229­162­23; NEGOTIATINGPARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND OVERLAND, PACIFIC AND CUTLER,REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON,OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATINGPARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – (CITY)D11.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8768 AND 8822 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHERIDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229­131­15,­16, AND ­26; NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND KELLY DEWITT,OVERLAND, PACIFIC, AND CUTLER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,AND SCG/DP ETIWANDA LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, OWNER;REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIESMAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – (CITY)D12.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8996 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED ASSAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229­283­79; NEGOTIATINGPARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND KELLY DEWITT, OVERLAND, PACIFIC ANDCUTLER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND BTC III RANCHOCUCAMONGA LOGISTICS CENTER LP, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, OWNER;REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIESMAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – (CITY)D13.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8821 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED ASSAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229­162­15; NEGOTIATINGPARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND KELLY DEWITT, OVERLAND, PACIFIC ANDCUTLER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND WILLIAM A. JONES ANDJOAN F. JONES, TRUSTEES OF THE JONES FAMILY TRUST OF 2010, AS TO AN UNDIVIDEDONETHIRD (1/3) INTEREST, AND JAMES ROY GARNESS AND RHONDA ANN GARNESS,UNDIVIDED ONETHIRD (1/3) INTEREST, AND JAMES ROY GARNESS AND RHONDA ANNGARNESS, TRUSTEES OF THE GARNESS FAMILY TRUST DATED JUNE 28, 2012, AS TO ANUNDIVIDED ONETHIRD (1/3) INTEREST, AND JOHN S. CLEMONS AND PATRICIA R. CLEMONS,TRUSTEES OF THE CLEMONS REVOCABLE TRUST DATED DECEMBER 4, 2014, AS TO ANUNDIVIDED ONETHIRD (1/3) INTEREST, AS TENANTS IN COMMON, OWNER; REGARDINGINSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAYNEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – (CITY)D14.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 12521 ARROW ROUTE AND 8688 ETIWANDA AVENUE,FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER0229­131­30 AND ­31; NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND KELLYDEWITT, OVERLAND, PACIFIC, AND CUTLER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHOCUCAMONGA, AND GOODMAN RANCHO SPE LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY,OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATINGPARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – (CITY)D15.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8889 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED ASSAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229­291­17 and ­18;NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND KELLY DEWITT, OVERLAND,PACIFIC, AND CUTLER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND LIGHTNINGP.M. LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONSTO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THEPROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – (CITY)D16.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8685 TO 8821 ETIWANDA AVENUE AND 12928 TO 12974WHITTRAM AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'SPARCEL NUMBER 0229­151­15 AND ­28, 0229­161­01, ­02, ­03, ­04, 05, ­19, AND ­20;NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND KELLY DEWITT, OVERLAND,PACIFIC, AND CUTLER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ANDCOLOMBERO FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TONEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THEPROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – (CITY)D17.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8939 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED ASSAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229­291­55; NEGOTIATINGPARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND KELLY DEWITT, OVERLAND, PACIFIC, ANDCUTLER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND BCORE IE WESTOWNER LLC, OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE.NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTHABOVE. – (CITY)D18.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 12467 BASE LINE ROAD IDENTIFIED AS PARCELNUMBERS 1090331030000, 1090331040000, 1089581040000; NEGOTIATING PARTIES JOHNGILLISON, CITY MANAGER REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ANDJOSEPH FILIPPI, JOSEPH FILIPPI WINERY AND VINEYARDS; REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS.– (CITY)E. RECESS – Closed Session to Recess to the Regular City Council Meeting at 7:00 P.M. in the CouncilChambers at City Hall, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California.REGULAR MEETING – 7:00 P.M.COUNCIL CHAMBERSPLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCEROLL CALL:Mayor MichaelMayor Pro Tem KennedyCouncil Members Hutchison, Scott, and SpagnoloA. AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDAB. ANNOUNCEMENT / PRESENTATIONSC. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONSMembers of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, SuccessorAgency, and Public Finance Authority. This is the time and place for the general public to addressthe Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public FinancingAuthority Board, and City Council on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits theFire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board,and City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Fire ProtectionDistrict, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Councilmay receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting.Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by theMayor, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to beaddressed directly to the Fire Board, Agencies, Successor Agency, Authority Board, or City Council not to themembers of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected.Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in anyactivity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting.The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of thebusiness portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topiccontained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for thesebusiness items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of theagenda commences. Any other public communications which have not concluded during this one hour periodmay resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed.CONSENT CALENDARS:The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and noncontroversial. They will be actedupon without discussion unless an item is removed by Council Member for discussion.Members of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, andPublic Finance Authority and may act on the consent calendar for those bodies as part of a single motion withthe City Council consent calendar.D. CONSENT CALENDARD1.Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Bi­Weekly Payroll in the Total Amount of$1,822,002.63 and City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers (Excluding Checks Issued toSouthern California Gas Company) in the Total Amount of $1,956,777.89 Dated December 17,2021 Through December 30, 2021 and City and Fire District Electronic Debit Registers for theMonth of December in the Total Amount of $1,563,074.46. (CITY/FIRE)D2.Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers for Checks Issued toSouthern California Gas Company in the Total Amount of $1,092.38 Dated December 17, 2021Through December 30, 2021. (CITY/FIRE)D3.Consideration to Receive and File Current Investment Schedules as of December 31, 2021 forthe City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District.(CITY/FIRE)D4.Consideration to Accept as Complete, File the Notice of Completion, and Authorize Release ofRetention and Bonds for the Fiscal Year 2021/22 Local Slurry Seal Pavement RehabilitationProject ­ Contract No. 2021­120. (CITY)D5.Consideration to Accept the Parks Painting Project FY 20­21 (CO# 2021­077) as Complete,File the Notice of Completion, and Authorize Release of Retention and Bonds. (CITY)D6.Consideration to Issue a Purchase Order for the Purchase of Fiber Optic Equipment from Calix,Inc. in the Amount of $100,000 and an Appropriation in the Amount of $150,000. (CITY)D7.Consideration of Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement with Kosmont & Associates, Inc., forServices Related to the Formation of an Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District (EIFD).(CITY)D8.Consideration of the Improvement Agreement and Improvement Securities for StreetImprovements, Order Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 9, Street LightMaintenance Districts Nos. 1 and 8 for Case No. DRC2014­01130, Located at the NorthwestCorner of Foothill Blvd. and East Avenue. (RESOLUTION NO. 2022­017) (RESOLUTION NO.2022­018), (RESOLUTION NO. 2022­019) (CITY)D9.Consideration of a Resolution Authorizing Submittal of Applications for All CalRecycle Grantand Payment Programs for which the City of Rancho Cucamonga is Eligible. (RESOLUTIONNO. 2022­020) (CITY)D10.Consideration of a Resolution Approving an Amendment to the Rancho CucamongaManagement Association and Part Time City Positions Salary Schedules for Fiscal Year 2021­2022. (RESOLUTION NO. 2022­021) (CITY)E. CONSENT CALENDAR ORDINANCE(S) ­ SECOND READING/ADOPTIONE1.Consideration of Second Reading and Adoption of the Following:ORDINANCE NO. 992AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA, CONSENTING TO ANNEXATION DRC2020­00185 AND APPROVINGPREZONING DRC2020­00186 IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OFTWO NEW INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS TOTALING APPROXIMATELY 655,878 SQUARE FEETON AN APPROXIMATE 35­ACRE PROJECT SITE LOCATED AT ETIWANDA AVENUE NORTHOF NAPA STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF – APNs: 0229­291­23, 46AND 54 ORDINANCE NO. 993AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2021­00175 BETWEEN THECITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND HILLWOOD ENTERPRISES, L.P., TO FACILITATE THEDEVELOPMENT OF TWO NEW INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS TOTALING APPROXIMATELY655,878 SQUARE FEET ON AN APPROXIMATE 35­ACRE PROJECT SITE LOCATEDAPPROXIMATELY 650 FEET EAST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE AND NORTH OF NAPA STREET;AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF – APN: 0229­291­46 AND 54F. ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING ITEM(S)F1.Consideration of First Reading of Ordinance No. 995, to be Read by Title Only and Waive FurtherReading, Amending Chapter 3.40 Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) of the Rancho CucamongaMunicipal Code to Confirm That Short­Term Rentals are Subject to the City’s Transient OccupancyTax, Further Clarify the Definition of Hotel and Transient Under the Chapter, Provide Regulations forFiling and Appeals Procedures, and Make Other Minor Amendments to the Chapter. (ORDINANCENO. 995) (CITY)F2.Discussion, Consideration and Possible Action to Introduce, Waive Reading of and Adopt by a Four­fifths Vote, for a Period of 45 Days, an Urgency Ordinance to Establish Objective Zoning AndSubdivision Standards for Senate Bill 9 Projects in Single­Family Residential Zones, Declaring TheUrgency Thereof and Making a Determination of Exemption Under the California EnvironmentalQuality Act (CEQA). (URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. 994) (CITY)F3.Consideration of a Resolution of Necessity for the Acquisition by Eminent Domain of Certain RealProperty Interests for Public Purposes in Connection with the Phase 1, Segment 2, San Sevaine TrailProject, A Joint Agency Project with the City of Fontana (Chao Ping Yan, Terminus of Smokestone Street, East of Torrey Pine Court, San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Number 0228­044­ 24). (RESOLUTION NO. 2022­007) (CITY) F4.Consideration of Resolutions of Necessity of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Declaring Certain Real Property Interests Necessary for Public Purposes and Authorizing the Acquisition Thereof in Connection with the City’s Etiwanda Grade Separation Project (Kular Truck Line, Inc., 8783 Etiwanda Avenue and 12949 Whittram Avenue, San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Number 0229­ 162­14; Lightning PM, LLC, 8889 Etiwanda Avenue, San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 0229­291­17 & 18; SCG of DP Etiwanda, LLC, 8768 & 8822 Etiwanda Avenue, San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 0229­131­15, 16 & 26; Jones Family Trust, Garness Family Trust, & Clemons Revocable Trust, 8821 Etiwanda Avenue, San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Number 0229­162­15; Goodman Rancho SPE, LLC, 12521 Arrow Route and 8688 Etiwanda Avenue, San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 0229­131­30 & 31; BTC III Rancho Cucamonga Logistics Center, LP, 8996 Etiwanda Avenue, San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Number 0229­283­79; BCORE IE West Owner, LLC, 8939 Etiwanda Avenue, San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Number 0229­291­55; Southern California Edison Company, 8949 Etiwanda Avenue, San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Number 0229­291­ 22; Colombero Family Limited Partnership, 8685 ­ 8821 Etiwanda Avenue and 12928 ­ 12974 Whittram Avenue, San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 0229­151­15 & 28 and 0229­161­01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 19 & 20).  (RESOLUTION NOS. 2022­008, 2022­009, 2022­010, 2022­ 011, 2022­012, 2022­013, 2022­014, 2022­015, 2022­016) (CITY). G. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM(S) ­ CITY/FIRE DISTRICT G1.8:00 PM Time Certain: Public Hearing #3 ­ Consideration of City Council District Boundaries, to Include Review of the Demographer’s Preliminary Analysis; Review of the Public Mapping Tool and Inviting the Community to Submit Maps; Review of Staff’s Presentation of Maps Prepared Using the Discussed Criteria; and Receipt of Public Input on Communities of Interest and Potential District Boundaries. (CITY) H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORT(S) H1.Consideration of an Agreement with SDI Presence LLC for Enterprise Resource Planning Software Consulting Services and Authorizing an Appropriation in the Amount of $270,000. (CITY) I. COUNCIL BUSINESS I1.COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Council Member.) I2.INTER​AGENCY UPDATES (Update by the City Council to the community on the meetings that were attended.) J. CITY ATTORNEY ITEMS K. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING L. ADJOURNMENT CERTIFICATION I, Linda A. Troyan, MMC, City Clerk Services Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify under penalty of perjury that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on at least Seventy­Two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California and on the City's website.  LINDA A. TROYAN, MMC CITY CLERK SERVICES DIRECTOR If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's office at (909) 477­2700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired.  CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT “Our Vision is to build on our success as a world class community,to create an equitable,sustainable,and vibrant city,rich in opportunity for all to thrive.” Page 8 MayorL. Dennis MichaelMayor Pro TemLynne B. KennedyMembers of the CityCouncil:Ryan A. HutchisonKristine D. ScottSam Spagnolo AMENDED AGENDA(ITEMS F3 AND F4 UPDATED TO REFLECT APN’s 1/14/2022 1:00PM)CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGAREGULAR MEETING AGENDAJanuary 19, 202210500 Civic Center DriveRancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARD – CITY COUNCILHOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY­ SUCCESSOR AGENCY – PUBLICFINANCE AUTHORITYCLOSED SESSION TRI­COMMUNITIES ROOM 4:30 P.M.REGULAR MEETINGS        COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 P.M.The City Council meets regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m.in the Council Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive.  It Is the Intent to concludethe meeting by 10:00 p.m. unless extended by the concurrence of the City Council. Agendas, minutes, and recordings of meetings can be found at www.cityofrc.us or bycontacting the City Clerk's Office at 909­774­2023. Live Broadcast available on Channel 3(RCTV­3).In accordance with AB 361, and to ensure the health and safety of our residents by limitingcontact that could spread the COVID–19 virus, members of the public have the option toparticipate in this City Council/Fire District meeting via a teleconference. Members of thepublic may also attend the meeting in person.  Those wishing to speak during publiccommunication may call at the start of the meeting by dialing (909)774­2751, if speakingon a Public Hearing item, please dial in when the Public Hearing is being heard at(909)774­2751 to be added to the queue for public comment. Calls will be answered in theorder received.  Members of the public are encouraged to watch from the safety of theirhomes by Live Streaming on the City's website at https://www.cityofrc.us/your­government/city­council­agendas or Local Cable: RCTV­3 Programming.  The City ofRancho Cucamonga thanks you in advance for taking all precautions to prevent spreadingthe COVID­19 virus.CLOSED SESSION – 4:30 P.M.  TRI­COMMUNITIES ROOM ROLL CALL: Mayor Michael                        Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy                        Council Members Hutchison, Scott, and Spagnolo A. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)C. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTSD. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSIOND1.CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR ROBERT NEIUBER, HUMAN RESOURCESDIRECTOR PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54954.2 REGARDING LABOR NEGOTIATIONSWITH THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY EMPLOYEES’ ASSOCIATION (RCCEA), TEAMSTERSLOCAL 1932, RANCHO CUCAMONGA MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENTGROUP – (CITY/FIRE)D2.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL ANTICIPATED LITIGATION: INITIATION OF LITIGATIONPURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.9: 2 CASES – (CITY)D3.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL ANTICIPATED LITIGATION: INITIATION OF LITIGATIONPURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.9: 1 CASE – (FIRE) D4.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH(1)OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: PEPE’S INC. V. CITY OF RANCHOCUCAMONGA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, CASENO. 5:20CV02506JGBSP – (CITY)D5.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH(1)OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: HIMNEL USA, INC. d/b/a ST. MARY'SMONTESSORI SCHOOL AND GLOBAL PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLC VS. CITY OF RANCHOCUCAMONGA, SBSC CASE NO.: CIVDS 2014554. – (CITY)D6.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH(1) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHOCUCAMONGA V. DR LANDMARK, INC.; POWER MEDIC TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; HOFERPROPERTIES, LLC; AND DOES 1 THROUGH 5 INCLUSIVE, SBSC CASE NO.: CIVDS 1904713 –(CITY)D7.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE TERMINUS OF SMOKESTONE STREET, EAST OFTORREY PINE COURT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 91739, IDENTIFIED AS COUNTYASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBER 0228­044­24, NEGOTIATING PARTIES JOHN GILLISON, CITYMANAGER REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND CHAO PING YANG;REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS. – (CITY)D8.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8949 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED ASSAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229­162­22; NEGOTIATINGPARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND OVERLAND, PACIFIC AND CUTLER,REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON,OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATINGPARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – (CITY)D9.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8783 ETIWANDA AVENUE/12949 WHITTRAM AVENUE,FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER0229­162­14; NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND OVERLAND,PACIFIC, AND CUTLER, REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND KULARTRUCK LINE, INC., OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNINGPRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTHABOVE. – (CITY)D10.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 9333 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED ASSAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229­162­23; NEGOTIATINGPARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND OVERLAND, PACIFIC AND CUTLER,REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON,OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATINGPARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – (CITY)D11.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8768 AND 8822 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHERIDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229­131­15,­16, AND ­26; NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND KELLY DEWITT,OVERLAND, PACIFIC, AND CUTLER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,AND SCG/DP ETIWANDA LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, OWNER;REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIESMAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – (CITY)D12.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8996 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED ASSAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229­283­79; NEGOTIATINGPARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND KELLY DEWITT, OVERLAND, PACIFIC ANDCUTLER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND BTC III RANCHOCUCAMONGA LOGISTICS CENTER LP, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, OWNER;REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIESMAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – (CITY)D13.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8821 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED ASSAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229­162­15; NEGOTIATINGPARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND KELLY DEWITT, OVERLAND, PACIFIC ANDCUTLER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND WILLIAM A. JONES ANDJOAN F. JONES, TRUSTEES OF THE JONES FAMILY TRUST OF 2010, AS TO AN UNDIVIDEDONETHIRD (1/3) INTEREST, AND JAMES ROY GARNESS AND RHONDA ANN GARNESS,UNDIVIDED ONETHIRD (1/3) INTEREST, AND JAMES ROY GARNESS AND RHONDA ANNGARNESS, TRUSTEES OF THE GARNESS FAMILY TRUST DATED JUNE 28, 2012, AS TO ANUNDIVIDED ONETHIRD (1/3) INTEREST, AND JOHN S. CLEMONS AND PATRICIA R. CLEMONS,TRUSTEES OF THE CLEMONS REVOCABLE TRUST DATED DECEMBER 4, 2014, AS TO ANUNDIVIDED ONETHIRD (1/3) INTEREST, AS TENANTS IN COMMON, OWNER; REGARDINGINSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAYNEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – (CITY)D14.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 12521 ARROW ROUTE AND 8688 ETIWANDA AVENUE,FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER0229­131­30 AND ­31; NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND KELLYDEWITT, OVERLAND, PACIFIC, AND CUTLER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHOCUCAMONGA, AND GOODMAN RANCHO SPE LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY,OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATINGPARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – (CITY)D15.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8889 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED ASSAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229­291­17 and ­18;NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND KELLY DEWITT, OVERLAND,PACIFIC, AND CUTLER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND LIGHTNINGP.M. LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONSTO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THEPROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – (CITY)D16.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8685 TO 8821 ETIWANDA AVENUE AND 12928 TO 12974WHITTRAM AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'SPARCEL NUMBER 0229­151­15 AND ­28, 0229­161­01, ­02, ­03, ­04, 05, ­19, AND ­20;NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND KELLY DEWITT, OVERLAND,PACIFIC, AND CUTLER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ANDCOLOMBERO FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TONEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THEPROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – (CITY)D17.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8939 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED ASSAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229­291­55; NEGOTIATINGPARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND KELLY DEWITT, OVERLAND, PACIFIC, ANDCUTLER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND BCORE IE WESTOWNER LLC, OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE.NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTHABOVE. – (CITY)D18.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 12467 BASE LINE ROAD IDENTIFIED AS PARCELNUMBERS 1090331030000, 1090331040000, 1089581040000; NEGOTIATING PARTIES JOHNGILLISON, CITY MANAGER REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ANDJOSEPH FILIPPI, JOSEPH FILIPPI WINERY AND VINEYARDS; REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS.– (CITY)E. RECESS – Closed Session to Recess to the Regular City Council Meeting at 7:00 P.M. in the CouncilChambers at City Hall, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California.REGULAR MEETING – 7:00 P.M.COUNCIL CHAMBERSPLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCEROLL CALL:Mayor MichaelMayor Pro Tem KennedyCouncil Members Hutchison, Scott, and SpagnoloA. AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDAB. ANNOUNCEMENT / PRESENTATIONSC. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONSMembers of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, SuccessorAgency, and Public Finance Authority. This is the time and place for the general public to addressthe Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public FinancingAuthority Board, and City Council on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits theFire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board,and City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Fire ProtectionDistrict, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Councilmay receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting.Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by theMayor, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to beaddressed directly to the Fire Board, Agencies, Successor Agency, Authority Board, or City Council not to themembers of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected.Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in anyactivity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting.The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of thebusiness portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topiccontained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for thesebusiness items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of theagenda commences. Any other public communications which have not concluded during this one hour periodmay resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed.CONSENT CALENDARS:The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and noncontroversial. They will be actedupon without discussion unless an item is removed by Council Member for discussion.Members of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, andPublic Finance Authority and may act on the consent calendar for those bodies as part of a single motion withthe City Council consent calendar.D. CONSENT CALENDARD1.Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Bi­Weekly Payroll in the Total Amount of$1,822,002.63 and City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers (Excluding Checks Issued toSouthern California Gas Company) in the Total Amount of $1,956,777.89 Dated December 17,2021 Through December 30, 2021 and City and Fire District Electronic Debit Registers for theMonth of December in the Total Amount of $1,563,074.46. (CITY/FIRE)D2.Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers for Checks Issued toSouthern California Gas Company in the Total Amount of $1,092.38 Dated December 17, 2021Through December 30, 2021. (CITY/FIRE)D3.Consideration to Receive and File Current Investment Schedules as of December 31, 2021 forthe City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District.(CITY/FIRE)D4.Consideration to Accept as Complete, File the Notice of Completion, and Authorize Release ofRetention and Bonds for the Fiscal Year 2021/22 Local Slurry Seal Pavement RehabilitationProject ­ Contract No. 2021­120. (CITY)D5.Consideration to Accept the Parks Painting Project FY 20­21 (CO# 2021­077) as Complete,File the Notice of Completion, and Authorize Release of Retention and Bonds. (CITY)D6.Consideration to Issue a Purchase Order for the Purchase of Fiber Optic Equipment from Calix,Inc. in the Amount of $100,000 and an Appropriation in the Amount of $150,000. (CITY)D7.Consideration of Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement with Kosmont & Associates, Inc., forServices Related to the Formation of an Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District (EIFD).(CITY)D8.Consideration of the Improvement Agreement and Improvement Securities for StreetImprovements, Order Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 9, Street LightMaintenance Districts Nos. 1 and 8 for Case No. DRC2014­01130, Located at the NorthwestCorner of Foothill Blvd. and East Avenue. (RESOLUTION NO. 2022­017) (RESOLUTION NO.2022­018), (RESOLUTION NO. 2022­019) (CITY)D9.Consideration of a Resolution Authorizing Submittal of Applications for All CalRecycle Grantand Payment Programs for which the City of Rancho Cucamonga is Eligible. (RESOLUTIONNO. 2022­020) (CITY)D10.Consideration of a Resolution Approving an Amendment to the Rancho CucamongaManagement Association and Part Time City Positions Salary Schedules for Fiscal Year 2021­2022. (RESOLUTION NO. 2022­021) (CITY)E. CONSENT CALENDAR ORDINANCE(S) ­ SECOND READING/ADOPTIONE1.Consideration of Second Reading and Adoption of the Following:ORDINANCE NO. 992AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA, CONSENTING TO ANNEXATION DRC2020­00185 AND APPROVINGPREZONING DRC2020­00186 IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OFTWO NEW INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS TOTALING APPROXIMATELY 655,878 SQUARE FEETON AN APPROXIMATE 35­ACRE PROJECT SITE LOCATED AT ETIWANDA AVENUE NORTHOF NAPA STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF – APNs: 0229­291­23, 46AND 54 ORDINANCE NO. 993AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2021­00175 BETWEEN THECITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND HILLWOOD ENTERPRISES, L.P., TO FACILITATE THEDEVELOPMENT OF TWO NEW INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS TOTALING APPROXIMATELY655,878 SQUARE FEET ON AN APPROXIMATE 35­ACRE PROJECT SITE LOCATEDAPPROXIMATELY 650 FEET EAST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE AND NORTH OF NAPA STREET;AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF – APN: 0229­291­46 AND 54F. ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING ITEM(S)F1.Consideration of First Reading of Ordinance No. 995, to be Read by Title Only and Waive FurtherReading, Amending Chapter 3.40 Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) of the Rancho CucamongaMunicipal Code to Confirm That Short­Term Rentals are Subject to the City’s Transient OccupancyTax, Further Clarify the Definition of Hotel and Transient Under the Chapter, Provide Regulations forFiling and Appeals Procedures, and Make Other Minor Amendments to the Chapter. (ORDINANCENO. 995) (CITY)F2.Discussion, Consideration and Possible Action to Introduce, Waive Reading of and Adopt by a Four­fifths Vote, for a Period of 45 Days, an Urgency Ordinance to Establish Objective Zoning AndSubdivision Standards for Senate Bill 9 Projects in Single­Family Residential Zones, Declaring TheUrgency Thereof and Making a Determination of Exemption Under the California EnvironmentalQuality Act (CEQA). (URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. 994) (CITY)F3.Consideration of a Resolution of Necessity for the Acquisition by Eminent Domain of Certain RealProperty Interests for Public Purposes in Connection with the Phase 1, Segment 2, San Sevaine TrailProject, A Joint Agency Project with the City of Fontana (Chao Ping Yan, Terminus of SmokestoneStreet, East of Torrey Pine Court, San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Number 0228­044­24). (RESOLUTION NO. 2022­007) (CITY)F4.Consideration of Resolutions of Necessity of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Declaring Certain RealProperty Interests Necessary for Public Purposes and Authorizing the Acquisition Thereof inConnection with the City’s Etiwanda Grade Separation Project (Kular Truck Line, Inc., 8783 EtiwandaAvenue and 12949 Whittram Avenue, San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Number 0229­162­14; Lightning PM, LLC, 8889 Etiwanda Avenue, San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s ParcelNumbers 0229­291­17 & 18; SCG of DP Etiwanda, LLC, 8768 & 8822 Etiwanda Avenue, SanBernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 0229­131­15, 16 & 26; Jones Family Trust,Garness Family Trust, & Clemons Revocable Trust, 8821 Etiwanda Avenue, San Bernardino CountyTax Assessor’s Parcel Number 0229­162­15; Goodman Rancho SPE, LLC, 12521 Arrow Route and8688 Etiwanda Avenue, San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 0229­131­30 & 31;BTC III Rancho Cucamonga Logistics Center, LP, 8996 Etiwanda Avenue, San Bernardino CountyTax Assessor’s Parcel Number 0229­283­79; BCORE IE West Owner, LLC, 8939 Etiwanda Avenue,San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Number 0229­291­55; Southern California EdisonCompany, 8949 Etiwanda Avenue, San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Number 0229­291­22; Colombero Family Limited Partnership, 8685 ­ 8821 Etiwanda Avenue and 12928 ­ 12974Whittram Avenue, San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 0229­151­15 & 28 and0229­161­01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 19 & 20).  (RESOLUTION NOS. 2022­008, 2022­009, 2022­010, 2022­011, 2022­012, 2022­013, 2022­014, 2022­015, 2022­016) (CITY).G. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM(S) ­ CITY/FIRE DISTRICTG1.8:00 PM Time Certain: Public Hearing #3 ­ Consideration of City Council District Boundaries, toInclude Review of the Demographer’s Preliminary Analysis; Review of the Public Mapping Tool andInviting the Community to Submit Maps; Review of Staff’s Presentation of Maps Prepared Using theDiscussed Criteria; and Receipt of Public Input on Communities of Interest and Potential DistrictBoundaries. (CITY)H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORT(S)H1.Consideration of an Agreement with SDI Presence LLC for Enterprise Resource Planning SoftwareConsulting Services and Authorizing an Appropriation in the Amount of $270,000. (CITY)I. COUNCIL BUSINESSI1.COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS(Comments to be limited to three minutes per Council Member.)I2.INTER​AGENCY UPDATES(Update by the City Council to the community on the meetings that were attended.)J. CITY ATTORNEY ITEMSK. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING L. ADJOURNMENT CERTIFICATION I, Linda A. Troyan, MMC, City Clerk Services Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify under penalty of perjury that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on at least Seventy­Two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California and on the City's website.  LINDA A. TROYAN, MMC CITY CLERK SERVICES DIRECTOR If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's office at (909) 477­2700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired.  CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT “Our Vision is to build on our success as a world class community,to create an equitable,sustainable,and vibrant city,rich in opportunity for all to thrive.” Page 9 DATE:January 19, 2022 TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council President and Members of the Boards of Directors FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY:Tamara L. Oatman, Finance Director Veronica Lopez, Accounts Payable Supervisor SUBJECT:Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Bi-Weekly Payroll in the Total Amount of $1,822,002.63 and City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers (Excluding Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company) in the Total Amount of $1,956,777.89 Dated December 17, 2021 Through December 30, 2021 and City and Fire District Electronic Debit Registers for the Month of December in the Total Amount of $1,563,074.46. (CITY/FIRE) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends City Council/Board of Directors of the Fire Protection District approve payment of demands as presented. Bi-weekly payroll is $1,049,898.60 and $772,104.03 for the City and the Fire District, respectively. Weekly check register amounts are $1,854,965.66 and $101,812.23 for the City and the Fire District, respectively. Electronic Debit Register amounts are $809,713.36 and $753,361.10 for the City and the Fire District, respectively. BACKGROUND: N/A ANALYSIS: N/A FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate budgeted funds are available for the payment of demands per the attached listing. COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: N/A ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 - Weekly Check Register Attachment 2 - Electronic Debit Register Page 10 Agenda Check Register RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. AND CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 12/17/2021 through 12/30/2021 Check No.Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00013524 12/20/2021 AHUMADA, ALEXANDER R 0.00 614.88 614.88 AP 00013525 12/20/2021 ALMAND, LLOYD 0.00 614.88 614.88 AP 00013526 12/20/2021 BANTAU, VICTORIA 0.00 456.06 456.06 AP 00013527 12/20/2021 BAZAL, SUSAN 0.00 698.71 698.71 AP 00013528 12/20/2021 BELL, MICHAEL L 0.00 1,577.74 1,577.74 AP 00013529 12/20/2021 BERRY, DAVID 0.00 614.88 614.88 AP 00013530 12/20/2021 BROCK, ROBIN 0.00 1,096.31 1,096.31 AP 00013531 12/20/2021 CAMPBELL, GERALD 0.00 873.31 873.31 AP 00013532 12/20/2021 CAMPBELL, STEVEN 0.00 614.88 614.88 AP 00013533 12/20/2021 CARNES, KENNETH 0.00 456.06 456.06 AP 00013534 12/20/2021 CLABBY, RICHARD 0.00 1,290.56 1,290.56 AP 00013535 12/20/2021 CLOUGHESY, DONALD R 0.00 2,095.76 2,095.76 AP 00013536 12/20/2021 CORCORAN, ROBERT ANTHONY 0.00 714.37 714.37 AP 00013537 12/20/2021 COSTELLO, DENNIS M 0.00 2,095.76 2,095.76 AP 00013538 12/20/2021 COX, KARL 0.00 614.88 614.88 AP 00013539 12/20/2021 CRANE, RALPH 0.00 614.88 614.88 AP 00013540 12/20/2021 CROSSLAND, WILBUR 0.00 456.06 456.06 AP 00013541 12/20/2021 CURATALO, JAMES 0.00 1,096.31 1,096.31 AP 00013542 12/20/2021 DAGUE, JAMES 0.00 1,080.65 1,080.65 AP 00013543 12/20/2021 DE ANTONIO, SUSAN 0.00 714.37 714.37 AP 00013544 12/20/2021 DEANS, JACKIE 0.00 232.94 232.94 AP 00013545 12/20/2021 DOMINICK, SAMUEL A 0.00 1,096.31 1,096.31 AP 00013546 12/20/2021 EAGLESON, MICHAEL 0.00 1,577.74 1,577.74 AP 00013547 12/20/2021 EGGERS, BOB 0.00 1,080.65 1,080.65 AP 00013548 12/20/2021 FEJERAN, TIM 0.00 1,722.43 1,722.43 AP 00013549 12/20/2021 FRITCHEY, JOHN D 0.00 456.06 456.06 AP 00013550 12/20/2021 HEYDE, DONALD 0.00 614.88 614.88 AP 00013551 12/20/2021 INTERLICCHIA, ROSALYN 0.00 232.94 232.94 AP 00013552 12/20/2021 JERKINS, PATRICK 0.00 1,722.43 1,722.43 AP 00013553 12/20/2021 KILMER, STEPHEN 0.00 1,290.56 1,290.56 AP 00013554 12/20/2021 KIRKPATRICK, WILLIAM M 0.00 858.13 858.13 AP 00013555 12/20/2021 LANE, WILLIAM 0.00 614.88 614.88 AP 00013556 12/20/2021 LARKIN, DAVID W 0.00 1,722.43 1,722.43 AP 00013557 12/20/2021 LEE, ALLAN J 0.00 232.94 232.94 AP 00013558 12/20/2021 LENZE, PAUL E 0.00 614.88 614.88 AP 00013559 12/20/2021 LONCAR, PHILIP 0.00 1,546.42 1,546.42 AP 00013560 12/20/2021 LONGO, JOE 0.00 153.53 153.53 AP 00013561 12/20/2021 LUTTRULL, DARRELL 0.00 456.06 456.06 AP 00013562 12/20/2021 MACKALL, BEVERLY 0.00 153.53 153.53 AP 00013563 12/20/2021 MAYFIELD, RON 0.00 614.88 614.88 AP 00013564 12/20/2021 MCKEE, JOHN 0.00 614.88 614.88 AP 00013565 12/20/2021 MCNEIL, KENNETH 0.00 614.88 614.88 AP 00013566 12/20/2021 MICHAEL, L. DENNIS 0.00 614.88 614.88 AP 00013567 12/20/2021 MORGAN, BYRON 0.00 1,968.84 1,968.84 AP 00013568 12/20/2021 MYSKOW, DENNIS 0.00 1,290.56 1,290.56 AP 00013569 12/20/2021 NAUMAN, MICHAEL 0.00 456.06 456.06 AP 00013570 12/20/2021 NELSON, MARY JANE 0.00 153.53 153.53 10:08:31 01/12/2022Current Date:JSHIELDS - Jason Shields Page:1 Time:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout User: Report:Page 11 Agenda Check Register RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. AND CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 12/17/2021 through 12/30/2021 Check No.Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00013571 12/20/2021 NOREEN, ERIC 0.00 2,095.76 2,095.76 AP 00013572 12/20/2021 O'BRIEN, TOM 0.00 1,577.74 1,577.74 AP 00013573 12/20/2021 PLOUNG, MICHAEL J 0.00 614.88 614.88 AP 00013574 12/20/2021 POST, MICHAEL R 0.00 1,546.42 1,546.42 AP 00013575 12/20/2021 PROULX, PATRICK 0.00 1,096.31 1,096.31 AP 00013576 12/20/2021 REDMOND, MIKE 0.00 614.88 614.88 AP 00013577 12/20/2021 ROBERTS, BRENT 0.00 714.37 714.37 AP 00013578 12/20/2021 ROBERTS, CHERYL L 0.00 2,095.76 2,095.76 AP 00013579 12/20/2021 ROEDER, JEFF 0.00 1,577.74 1,577.74 AP 00013580 12/20/2021 SALISBURY, THOMAS 0.00 614.88 614.88 AP 00013581 12/20/2021 SMITH, RONALD 0.00 456.06 456.06 AP 00013582 12/20/2021 SORENSEN, SCOTT D 0.00 1,546.42 1,546.42 AP 00013583 12/20/2021 SPAGNOLO, SAM 0.00 456.06 456.06 AP 00013584 12/20/2021 SPAIN, WILLIAM 0.00 873.31 873.31 AP 00013585 12/20/2021 SULLIVAN, JAMES 0.00 456.06 456.06 AP 00013586 12/20/2021 TAYLOR, STEVEN 0.00 1,878.66 1,878.66 AP 00013587 12/20/2021 TULEY, TERRY 0.00 1,577.74 1,577.74 AP 00013588 12/20/2021 VANDERKALLEN, FRANCIS 0.00 614.88 614.88 AP 00013589 12/20/2021 VARNEY, ANTHONY 0.00 614.88 614.88 AP 00013590 12/20/2021 WALTON, KEVIN 0.00 1,722.43 1,722.43 AP 00013591 12/20/2021 YOWELL, TIMOTHY A 0.00 614.88 614.88 AP 00013592 12/21/2021 BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP 637.50 0.00 637.50 AP 00013593 12/21/2021 CALIF GOVERNMENT VEBA / RANCHO CUCAMONGA 339,740.85 0.00 339,740.85 AP 00013594 12/21/2021 CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT 749.04 0.00 749.04 AP 00013595 12/21/2021 ELECNOR BELCO ELECTRIC INC 6,553.94 0.00 6,553.94 AP 00013596 12/21/2021 MOFFATT & NICHOL 228,309.73 0.00 228,309.73 AP 00013597 12/21/2021 RCCEA 1,535.75 0.00 1,535.75 AP 00013598 12/21/2021 RCPFA 13,290.36 0.00 13,290.36 AP 00013599 12/21/2021 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 32,969.02 0.00 32,969.02 AP 00013600 12/21/2021 RIVERSIDE, CITY OF 6,909.00 0.00 6,909.00 AP 00013601 12/21/2021 U S DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 8,057.39 0.00 8,057.39 AP 00013602 12/21/2021 KME FIRE APPARATUS 0.00 1,029.32 1,029.32 AP 00013603 12/21/2021 LN CURTIS AND SONS 0.00 550.67 550.67 AP 00013604 12/21/2021 MINUTEMAN PRESS 3,072.78 0.00 3,072.78 AP 00013605 12/21/2021 OFFICE DEPOT 666.55 0.00 666.55 AP 00013606 12/21/2021 PSA PRINT GROUP 232.74 0.00 232.74 AP 00421908 12/20/2021 RODRIGUEZ, VICTOR 0.00 614.88 614.88 AP 00421909 12/20/2021 TOWNSEND, JAMES 0.00 2,095.76 2,095.76 AP 00421910 12/20/2021 WALKER, KENNETH 0.00 232.94 232.94 AP 00421911 12/21/2021 49ER COMMUNICATIONS INC 0.00 589.60 589.60 AP 00421912 12/21/2021 ADVANTAGE SEALING SYSTEMS INC 376.37 0.00 376.37 AP 00421913 12/21/2021 AFLAC GROUP INSURANCE 24.58 0.00 24.58 AP 00421914 12/21/2021 ASCENT ENVIRONMENTAL INC 5,711.25 0.00 5,711.25 AP 00421915 12/21/2021 BAILEY, JACOB 0.00 225.00 225.00 AP 00421916 12/21/2021 BRIGHTVIEW LANDSCAPE SERVICES INC 17,420.67 0.00 17,420.67 ***AP 00421919 12/21/2021 C V W D 17,896.85 698.05 18,594.90 AP 00421920 12/21/2021 CALIFA GROUP 5,349.48 0.00 5,349.48 10:08:31 01/12/2022Current Date:JSHIELDS - Jason Shields Page:2 Time:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout User: Report:Page 12 Agenda Check Register RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. AND CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 12/17/2021 through 12/30/2021 Check No.Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount ***AP 00421921 12/21/2021 CALIFORNIA DEPT OF TAX & FEE ADMINISTRATION 118.10 1,052.98 1,171.08 AP 00421922 12/21/2021 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 342.73 0.00 342.73 AP 00421923 12/21/2021 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 32.26 0.00 32.26 AP 00421924 12/21/2021 CalPERS LONG-TERM CARE PROGRAM 177.08 0.00 177.08 AP 00421925 12/21/2021 CAMERON WELDING 113.85 0.00 113.85 AP 00421926 12/21/2021 CHINO MOWER & EQUIPMENT 1,308.05 0.00 1,308.05 ***AP 00421927 12/21/2021 CINTAS CORPORATION #150 1,151.02 286.15 1,437.17 AP 00421928 12/21/2021 COAST RECREATION INC 725.89 0.00 725.89 AP 00421929 12/21/2021 COMPUTERIZED EMBROIDERY COMPANY 0.00 6,713.91 6,713.91 AP 00421930 12/21/2021 COYNE, STEVEN M 15,000.00 0.00 15,000.00 AP 00421931 12/21/2021 D & K CONCRETE COMPANY 648.66 0.00 648.66 AP 00421932 12/21/2021 DIRECTV 88.99 0.00 88.99 AP 00421933 12/21/2021 DOG WASTE DEPOT 3,341.19 0.00 3,341.19 AP 00421934 12/21/2021 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 108.93 0.00 108.93 AP 00421935 12/21/2021 FIELDMAN ROLAPP & ASSOCIATES 125.00 0.00 125.00 AP 00421936 12/21/2021 FORTIN LAW GROUP 2,986.35 0.00 2,986.35 AP 00421937 12/21/2021 G/M BUSINESS INTERIORS 59.70 0.00 59.70 AP 00421938 12/21/2021 GENTRY GENERAL ENGINEERING INC 292,881.83 0.00 292,881.83 ***AP 00421939 12/21/2021 GOLDEN STATE RISK MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY 96,428.00 1,232.00 97,660.00 AP 00421940 12/21/2021 GONSALVES & SON, JOE A 3,000.00 0.00 3,000.00 AP 00421941 12/21/2021 GRAINGER 525.01 0.00 525.01 AP 00421942 12/21/2021 HANDTEVY PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY STANDARDS 0.00 597.00 597.00 AP 00421943 12/21/2021 HONDA YAMAHA HUSQVARNA OF REDLANDS 365.37 0.00 365.37 AP 00421944 12/21/2021 HU, ANQI 77.50 0.00 77.50 AP 00421945 12/21/2021 INLAND EMPIRE PROPERTY SERVICES INC 0.00 7,300.00 7,300.00 AP 00421946 12/21/2021 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN INC 246,380.47 0.00 246,380.47 AP 00421947 12/21/2021 LIFE-ASSIST INC 0.00 4,861.33 4,861.33 ***AP 00421948 12/21/2021 NAPA AUTO PARTS 256.83 484.46 741.29 ***AP 00421949 12/21/2021 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CTRS OF CA 189.50 544.50 734.00 AP 00421950 12/21/2021 ONWARD ENGINEERING 17,197.50 0.00 17,197.50 AP 00421951 12/21/2021 PACIFIC UTILITY INSTALLATION INC 304.00 0.00 304.00 AP 00421952 12/21/2021 PINNACLE PETROLEUM INC 2,363.56 0.00 2,363.56 AP 00421953 12/21/2021 PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 60.17 0.00 60.17 AP 00421954 12/21/2021 PRECISION AERIAL SERVICES INC 3,614.64 0.00 3,614.64 AP 00421955 12/21/2021 PRIME GLASS 331.06 0.00 331.06 AP 00421956 12/21/2021 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 3,166.00 0.00 3,166.00 AP 00421957 12/21/2021 RAPID DIESEL REPAIR LLC 3,810.36 0.00 3,810.36 AP 00421958 12/21/2021 RESOURCE BUILDING MATERIALS 1,724.00 0.00 1,724.00 AP 00421959 12/21/2021 RILEY ELECTRIC 129.60 0.00 129.60 AP 00421960 12/21/2021 RMUS LLC 0.00 7,180.46 7,180.46 AP 00421961 12/21/2021 SAFE-ENTRY TECHNICAL INC 0.00 50.00 50.00 AP 00421962 12/21/2021 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 50.00 0.00 50.00 AP 00421963 12/21/2021 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 390.00 0.00 390.00 AP 00421964 12/21/2021 SAN BERNARDINO CTY AUDITOR CONTROLLER 104.00 0.00 104.00 AP 00421965 12/21/2021 SANTA FE TRAILS LAND LTD 201.60 0.00 201.60 AP 00421966 12/21/2021 SBPEA 2,370.04 0.00 2,370.04 AP 00421967 12/21/2021 SIEMENS MOBILITY INC 107,113.57 0.00 107,113.57 10:08:31 01/12/2022Current Date:JSHIELDS - Jason Shields Page:3 Time:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout User: Report:Page 13 Agenda Check Register RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. AND CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 12/17/2021 through 12/30/2021 Check No.Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00421968 12/21/2021 SILVER & WRIGHT LLP 10,377.45 0.00 10,377.45 AP 00421970 12/21/2021 SOLAR PERMIT SPECIALISTS 91.62 0.00 91.62 AP 00421974 12/21/2021 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13,454.42 0.00 13,454.42 AP 00421975 12/21/2021 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2,845.53 0.00 2,845.53 AP 00421976 12/21/2021 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE INC 221,390.33 0.00 221,390.33 AP 00421977 12/21/2021 TIREHUB LLC 0.00 844.00 844.00 AP 00421978 12/21/2021 TRI POINTE HOMES 3,648.24 0.00 3,648.24 AP 00421979 12/21/2021 TYLER, SUSAN 39.35 0.00 39.35 AP 00421980 12/21/2021 U S BANK N A CORPORATE TRUST 9,745.00 0.00 9,745.00 AP 00421981 12/21/2021 UNITED WAY 45.00 0.00 45.00 AP 00421982 12/21/2021 UNITY COURIER SERVICE INC 1,143.00 0.00 1,143.00 AP 00421983 12/21/2021 UPS 68.70 0.00 68.70 AP 00421985 12/21/2021 VELOCITY TRUCK CENTERS 242.43 0.00 242.43 AP 00421986 12/21/2021 VERIZON 26.34 0.00 26.34 AP 00421987 12/21/2021 VIRGIN PULSE INC 1,108.80 0.00 1,108.80 AP 00421988 12/21/2021 VISION SERVICE PLAN CA 10,639.86 0.00 10,639.86 AP 00421989 12/21/2021 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 8,511.55 0.00 8,511.55 AP 00421990 12/21/2021 WEST COAST ARBORISTS INC 69,031.80 0.00 69,031.80 AP 00421991 12/21/2021 WESTERN STATES TRANSMISSIONS 2,539.23 0.00 2,539.23 AP 00421992 12/21/2021 WILSON & BELL AUTO SERVICE 1,150.75 0.00 1,150.75 AP 00421993 12/21/2021 WINZER CORPORATION 0.00 169.54 169.54 $1,854,965.66 $1,956,777.89 $101,812.23 Note: Grand Total: Total Fire: Total City: *** Check Number includes both City and Fire District expenditures 10:08:31 01/12/2022Current Date:JSHIELDS - Jason Shields Page:4 Time:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout User: Report:Page 14 DATE DESCRIPTION CITY FIRE AMOUNT 12/1 WIRE PAYMENT - RCMU CAISO 31,934.95 31,934.95 12/1 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 128.14 128.14 12/1 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 71.81 71.81 12/2 Bank Fee 81.45 81.45 12/2 CALPERS - City - Retirement Account Deposit 55,545.43 55,545.43 12/2 CALPERS - City - Retirement Account Deposit 105,955.96 105,955.96 12/2 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 3,293.04 3,293.04 12/2 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 3,436.12 3,436.12 12/2 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 4,706.60 4,706.60 12/2 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 10,247.04 10,247.04 12/2 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 36,194.44 36,194.44 12/2 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 111,161.43 111,161.43 12/2 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT - Child Support Payments 3,700.60 3,700.60 12/2 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT - Child Support Payments 1,296.50 1,296.50 12/2 U.S. BANK - Purchasing Card, Corporate Card and Costco Card Payment 65,752.45 24,155.48 89,907.93 12/2 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 811.97 811.97 12/2 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 650.16 650.16 12/3 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 100.61 100.61 12/3 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 1,044.40 1,044.40 12/6 WIRE PAYMENT - RCMU CAISO 25,422.34 25,422.34 12/6 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 2,379.07 2,379.07 12/7 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 200.85 200.85 12/7 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 98.01 98.01 12/8 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 726.17 726.17 12/9 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 10.85 10.85 12/9 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 132.38 132.38 12/10 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 1,610.00 1,610.00 12/13 WIRE PAYMENT - RCMU CAISO 27,280.85 27,280.85 12/13 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 2,045.40 2,045.40 12/14 WIRE PAYMENT - RCMU CAISO 241.59 241.59 12/14 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 497.22 497.22 12/14 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 984.15 984.15 12/15 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 763.66 763.66 12/15 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 595.09 595.09 12/16 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT - Child Support Payments 3,700.60 3,700.60 12/16 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT - Child Support Payments 1,296.50 1,296.50 12/16 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 2,146.40 2,146.40 12/16 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 137.59 137.59 12/17 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 32.58 32.58 12/17 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 1,392.75 1,392.75 12/20 CALPERS - City - Retirement Account Deposit 54,139.56 54,139.56 12/20 CALPERS - City - Retirement Account Deposit 105,695.59 105,695.59 12/20 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 3,293.03 3,293.03 12/20 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 3,436.12 3,436.12 12/20 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 4,639.51 4,639.51 12/20 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 10,042.81 10,042.81 12/20 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 35,341.11 35,341.11 12/20 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 108,983.47 108,983.47 12/20 WIRE PAYMENT - RCMU CAISO 136,587.47 136,587.47 12/20 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 2,524.19 2,524.19 12/21 WIRE PAYMENT - RCMU CAISO 86.89 86.89 12/21 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 492.03 492.03 12/21 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 1,242.57 1,242.57 12/22 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 194,912.33 194,912.33 12/22 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 992.50 992.50 12/22 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 709.55 709.55 12/23 CALPERS - City - Retirement Account Deposit 52,298.40 52,298.40 12/23 CALPERS - City - Retirement Account Deposit 105,611.64 105,611.64 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Electronic Debit Register DECEMBER 1, 2021 to DECEMBER 31, 2021 1 Page 15 DATE DESCRIPTION CITY FIRE AMOUNT CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Electronic Debit Register DECEMBER 1, 2021 to DECEMBER 31, 2021 12/23 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 3,293.04 3,293.04 12/23 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 3,436.12 3,436.12 12/23 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 5,007.34 5,007.34 12/23 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 10,079.65 10,079.65 12/23 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 35,210.47 35,210.47 12/23 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 107,518.23 107,518.23 12/23 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 771.71 771.71 12/23 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 1,701.12 1,701.12 12/24 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 3,400.94 3,400.94 12/27 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 365.28 365.28 12/27 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 1,447.00 1,447.00 12/28 WIRE PAYMENT - RCMU CAISO 30,853.73 30,853.73 12/28 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 669.26 669.26 12/28 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 61.57 61.57 12/29 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT - Child Support Payments 3,700.60 3,700.60 12/29 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 1,500.00 1,500.00 12/31 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 149.00 149.00 12/31 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 918.00 918.00 TOTAL CITY 809,713.36 TOTAL FIRE 753,361.10 GRAND TOTAL 1,563,074.46 2 Page 16 DATE:January 19, 2022 TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council President and Members of the Boards of Directors FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY:Tamara L.Oatman, Finance Director Veronica Lopez, Accounts Payable Supervisor SUBJECT:Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers for Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company in the Total Amount of $1,092.38 Dated December 17, 2021 Through December 30, 2021. (CITY/FIRE) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends City Council/Board of Directors of the Fire Protection District approve payment of demands as presented. Weekly check register amounts are $14.79 and $1,077.59 for the City and the Fire District, respectively. BACKGROUND: N/A ANALYSIS: N/A FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate budgeted funds are available for the payment of demands per the attached listing. COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: N/A ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 - Weekly Check Register Page 17 Agenda Check Register RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT So Calif Gas Company Only. AND CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 12/17/2021 through 12/30/2021 Check No.Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount ***AP 00421969 12/21/2021 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 14.79 1,077.59 1,092.38 $14.79 $1,092.38 $1,077.59 Note: Grand Total: Total Fire: Total City: *** Check Number includes both City and Fire District expenditures 10:10:26 01/12/2022Current Date:JSHIELDS - Jason Shields Page:1 Time:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout User: Report:Page 18 DATE:January 19, 2022 TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council President and Members of the Boards of Directors FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY:Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services Tamara L. Oatman, Finance Director SUBJECT:Consideration to Receive and File Current Investment Schedules as of December 31, 2021 for the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. (CITY/FIRE) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council/Board of Directors of the Fire Protection District receive and file the attached current investment schedules for the City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (District) as of December 31, 2021. BACKGROUND: The attached investment schedules as of December 31, 2021 reflect cash and investments managed by the Finance Department/Revenue Management Division and are in conformity with the requirements of California Government Code Section 53601 and the City of Rancho Cucamonga’s and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District’s adopted Investment Policies as approved on June 28, 2021. ANALYSIS: The City’s and District’s Treasurers are each required to submit a quarterly investment report to the City Council and the Fire Board, respectively, in accordance with California Government Code Section 53646. The quarterly investment report is required to be submitted within 30 days following the end of the quarter covered by the report. However, the City and District Treasurers have each elected to provide this report on a monthly basis. FISCAL IMPACT: None. COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: The monthly investment schedule supports the City Council’s core value of providing and nurturing a high quality of life for all by demonstrating the active, prudent fiscal management of the City’s investment portfolio to ensure that financial resources are available to support the various services the City provides to all Rancho Cucamonga stakeholders. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 – Investment Schedule (City) Attachment 2 – Investment Schedule (Fire) Page 19 Page 20 For the Month Ending December 31, 2021 Account Statement Consolidated Summary Statement CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Investment Allocation Investment Type Closing Market Value Percent 9,380,801.28 2.68 Asset-Backed Security 38,086,416.65 10.88 Federal Agency Bond / Note 38,003,688.88 10.86 Corporate Note 1,221,354.90 0.35 Certificate of Deposit - FDIC Insured 1,006,280.00 0.29 Municipal Bond / Note 8,370,168.52 2.39 Supra-National Agency Bond / Note 174,195,961.39 49.77 U.S. Treasury Bond / Note 74,532,150.94 21.30 Local Agency Investment Fund 5,196,577.91 1.48 Passbook/Checking Accounts $349,993,400.47 Total 100.00% Portfolio Summary and Income Closing Market ValuePortfolio Holdings Cash Dividends PFM Managed Account 196,076.46 270,264,671.62 Local Agency Investment Fund 0.00 74,532,150.94 Passbook/Checking Accounts 0.00 5,196,577.91 $196,076.46 $349,993,400.47 Total Maturity Distribution (Fixed Income Holdings) Portfolio Holdings Closing Market Value Percent 79,728,728.85 0.00 0.00 0.00 19,911,184.83 79,461,056.93 58,350,750.48 59,278,275.03 53,263,404.35 0.00 22.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.69 22.70 16.67 16.94 15.22 0.00 Under 30 days 31 to 60 days 61 to 90 days 91 to 180 days 181 days to 1 year 1 to 2 years 2 to 3 years 3 to 4 years 4 to 5 years Over 5 years Total $349,993,400.47 755 100.00% Weighted Average Days to Maturity Sector Allocation 2.68% ABS 10.88% Fed Agy Bond / Note 10.86% Corporate Note 0.35% Cert of Deposit - FDIC 0.29% Muni Bond / Note 2.39% Supra-National Agency Bond / Note 49.77% US TSY Bond / Note 21.30% Local Agency Investment Fund 1.48% Passbook/Checking Accounts Summary Page 1 Page 21 For the Month Ending December 31, 2021Managed Account Summary Statement CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000 Total Cash Basis Earnings Plus Net Realized Gains/Losses Less Purchased Interest Related to Interest/Coupons Interest/Dividends/Coupons Received Earnings Reconciliation (Cash Basis) - Managed Account Less Beginning Accrued Interest Less Beginning Amortized Value of Securities Less Cost of New Purchases Plus Coupons/Dividends Received Plus Proceeds of Maturities/Calls/Principal Payments Plus Proceeds from Sales Ending Accrued Interest Ending Amortized Value of Securities Earnings Reconciliation (Accrual Basis) $270,479,494.02 0.00 (7,305,793.13) 7,866,595.09 0.00 (775,624.36) $270,264,671.62 135,875.32 (11,412.14) 71,613.28 $196,076.46 Total 273,363,810.24 723,130.30 7,343,578.50 0.00 98,089.95 (7,878,007.23) (272,864,223.22) (599,477.62) Total Accrual Basis Earnings $186,900.92 Closing Market Value Change in Current Value Unsettled Trades Principal Acquisitions Principal Dispositions Maturities/Calls Opening Market Value Transaction Summary - Managed Account _________________ _________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________Reconciling Transactions Net Cash Contribution Security Purchases Principal Payments Coupon/Interest/Dividend Income Sale Proceeds Maturities/Calls Cash Transactions Summary - Managed Account 0.00 7,343,578.50 98,089.95 0.00 (7,878,007.23) 0.00 0.00 Cash Balance $180,711.76 Closing Cash Balance Account 73340000 Page 1 Page 22 For the Month Ending December 31, 2021Portfolio Summary and Statistics CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000 Account Summary Percent Par Value Market ValueDescription U.S. Treasury Bond / Note 174,030,000.00 174,195,961.39 64.46 Supra-National Agency Bond / Note 8,410,000.00 8,370,168.52 3.10 Municipal Bond / Note 1,000,000.00 1,006,280.00 0.37 Federal Agency Bond / Note 38,745,000.00 38,086,416.65 14.09 Corporate Note 37,475,000.00 38,003,688.88 14.06 Certificate of Deposit - FDIC Insured 1,225,000.00 1,221,354.90 0.45 Asset-Backed Security 9,440,000.00 9,380,801.28 3.47 Managed Account Sub-Total 270,325,000.00 270,264,671.62 100.00% Accrued Interest 723,130.30 Total Portfolio 270,325,000.00 270,987,801.92 Unsettled Trades 0.00 0.00 Sector Allocation 3.47% ABS 0.45% Cert of Deposit - FDIC 14.06% Corporate Note 14.09% Fed Agy Bond / Note 0.37% Muni Bond / Note 3.10% Supra-National Agency Bond / Note 64.46% US TSY Bond / Note 0 - 6 Months 6 - 12 Months 1 - 2 Years 2 - 3 Years 3 - 4 Years 4 - 5 Years Over 5 Years 0.00% 7.37% 29.40% 21.59%21.93% 19.71% 0.00% Maturity Distribution Characteristics Yield to Maturity at Cost Yield to Maturity at Market Weighted Average Days to Maturity 977 0.51% 0.90% Account 73340000 Page 2 Page 23 For the Month Ending December 31, 2021Managed Account Issuer Summary CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000 Credit Quality (S&P Ratings) 1.76% A 0.56% A+ 3.87% A- 0.53% AA 81.90% AA+ 2.07% AA- 5.57% AAA 2.29% BBB+ 1.45% NR Issuer Summary Percentof HoldingsIssuer Market Value 1,439,852.00 0.53 AMAZON.COM INC 1,779,761.85 0.66 AMERICAN EXPRESS CO 1,971,948.00 0.73 AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE 8,032,266.63 2.97 APPLE INC 1,653,657.15 0.61 ASTRAZENECA PLC 508,899.83 0.19 BMW FINANCIAL SERVICES NA LLC 1,857,227.80 0.69 CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORP 2,440,290.29 0.90 CARMAX AUTO OWNER TRUST 1,964,774.00 0.73 CATERPILLAR INC 656,978.52 0.24 CHARLES SCHWAB 240,204.37 0.09 CHIPPEWA VALLEY BANK 1,493,379.00 0.55 CITIGROUP INC 242,636.24 0.09 ENERBANK USA 26,466,103.55 9.79 FANNIE MAE 2,935,098.00 1.09 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS 8,685,215.10 3.21 FREDDIE MAC 1,710,262.40 0.63 GENERAL DYNAMICS CORP 372,612.38 0.14 GM FINANCIAL CONSUMER AUTOMOBILE TRUST 511,756.12 0.19 GM FINANCIAL LEASINGTRUST 1,857,533.10 0.69 GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC 1,269,855.60 0.47 HONDA AUTO RECEIVABLES 278,531.93 0.10 HYUNDAI AUTO LEASE SECURITIZATION TRUST 534,704.98 0.20 HYUNDAI AUTO RECEIVABLES 1,790,238.33 0.66 IBM CORP 5,238,083.56 1.94 INTER-AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK 3,132,084.96 1.16 INTL BANK OF RECONSTRUCTION AND DEV 1,656,882.85 0.61 JP MORGAN CHASE & CO 911,311.03 0.34 KUBOTA CREDIT OWNER TRUST 1,673,953.60 0.62 LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP 240,625.04 0.09 MEDALLION BANK UTAH 179,444.52 0.07 MERCEDES-BENZ AUTO LEASE TRUST 1,307,848.08 0.48 MORGAN STANLEY Account 73340000 Page 3 Page 24 For the Month Ending December 31, 2021Managed Account Issuer Summary CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000 Percentof HoldingsIssuer Market Value 3,038,202.00 1.12 NOVARTIS AG 1,006,280.00 0.37 SAN MATEO-FOSTER CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT 1,638,357.52 0.61 THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORPORATION 1,086,143.18 0.40 TOYOTA MOTOR CORP 437,147.92 0.16 UNILEVER PLC 174,195,961.39 64.46 UNITED STATES TREASURY 2,554,470.00 0.95 US BANCORP 1,025,066.63 0.38 VOLKSWAGEN OF AMERICA 249,022.17 0.09 WELLS FARGO & COMPANY $270,264,671.62 Total 100.00% Account 73340000 Page 4 Page 25 For the Month Ending December 31, 2021Managed Account Detail of Securities Held CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000 Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTradeSettle Par U.S. Treasury Bond / Note US TREASURY NOTES DTD 10/15/2019 1.375% 10/15/2022 3,175,593.75 3,180,634.22 9,281.25 3,229,734.37 09/28/2009/24/20AaaAA+ 3,150,000.00 912828YK0 0.14 US TREASURY NOTES DTD 11/15/2012 1.625% 11/15/2022 2,627,625.00 2,633,257.05 5,485.50 2,677,390.62 11/05/2010/30/20AaaAA+ 2,600,000.00 912828TY6 0.15 US TREASURY NOTES DTD 11/30/2015 2.000% 11/30/2022 8,522,062.08 8,542,314.13 14,769.23 8,695,312.50 01/08/2101/06/21AaaAA+ 8,400,000.00 912828M80 0.14 US TREASURY NOTES DTD 12/31/2015 2.125% 12/31/2022 5,083,594.00 5,097,325.21 293.51 5,205,078.13 11/24/2011/23/20AaaAA+ 5,000,000.00 912828N30 0.17 US TREASURY NOTES DTD 01/31/2018 2.375% 01/31/2023 2,449,500.00 2,456,655.04 23,853.26 2,515,031.25 11/20/2011/17/20AaaAA+ 2,400,000.00 9128283U2 0.19 US TREASURY NOTES DTD 02/28/2018 2.625% 02/28/2023 1,854,684.38 1,860,972.02 16,143.75 1,910,257.03 11/18/2011/16/20AaaAA+ 1,810,000.00 9128284A5 0.19 US TREASURY NOTES DTD 02/29/2016 1.500% 02/28/2023 7,082,031.60 7,110,964.74 35,676.80 7,200,156.25 01/26/2101/25/21AaaAA+ 7,000,000.00 912828P79 0.13 US TREASURY NOTES DTD 03/15/2020 0.500% 03/15/2023 5,000,781.00 5,020,193.04 7,458.56 5,039,648.44 11/05/2010/30/20AaaAA+ 5,000,000.00 912828ZD5 0.16 US TREASURY NOTES DTD 04/30/2018 2.750% 04/30/2023 5,146,094.00 5,170,762.87 23,549.72 5,329,882.81 10/07/2010/06/20AaaAA+ 5,000,000.00 9128284L1 0.17 US TREASURY NOTES DTD 05/31/2016 1.625% 05/31/2023 3,551,953.30 3,571,687.61 5,000.00 3,630,429.69 11/05/2010/30/20AaaAA+ 3,500,000.00 912828R69 0.17 US TREASURY NOTES DTD 06/15/2020 0.250% 06/15/2023 6,469,531.25 6,509,786.93 758.93 6,518,281.25 09/28/2009/24/20AaaAA+ 6,500,000.00 912828ZU7 0.15 US TREASURY N/B NOTES DTD 07/31/2021 0.125% 07/31/2023 5,952,187.20 5,992,135.92 3,138.59 5,990,156.25 08/09/2108/06/21AaaAA+ 6,000,000.00 91282CCN9 0.21 US TREASURY NOTES DTD 08/15/2020 0.125% 08/15/2023 4,958,594.00 4,995,347.37 2,360.73 4,991,796.88 10/07/2010/06/20AaaAA+ 5,000,000.00 91282CAF8 0.18 US TREASURY NOTES DTD 09/15/2020 0.125% 09/15/2023 4,953,906.00 4,993,007.24 1,864.64 4,988,476.56 11/24/2011/23/20AaaAA+ 5,000,000.00 91282CAK7 0.21 Account 73340000 Page 5 Page 26 For the Month Ending December 31, 2021Managed Account Detail of Securities Held CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000 Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTradeSettle Par U.S. Treasury Bond / Note US TREASURY NOTES DTD 09/30/2021 0.250% 09/30/2023 1,985,937.60 1,999,243.90 1,277.47 1,999,140.63 10/06/2110/04/21AaaAA+ 2,000,000.00 91282CDA6 0.27 US TREASURY N/B NOTES DTD 10/31/2021 0.375% 10/31/2023 5,966,250.00 5,984,494.50 3,853.59 5,983,125.00 11/03/2111/01/21AaaAA+ 6,000,000.00 91282CDD0 0.52 US TREASURY NOTES DTD 02/28/2019 2.375% 02/29/2024 8,272,500.00 8,379,220.63 64,558.01 8,600,312.50 09/28/2009/24/20AaaAA+ 8,000,000.00 9128286G0 0.18 US TREASURY NOTES DTD 05/01/2017 2.000% 04/30/2024 3,712,717.79 3,763,338.09 12,382.87 3,836,983.59 11/05/2010/30/20AaaAA+ 3,615,000.00 912828X70 0.23 US TREASURY N/B NOTES DTD 05/15/2021 0.250% 05/15/2024 1,874,171.78 1,880,267.78 616.71 1,878,921.88 11/03/2111/01/21AaaAA+ 1,900,000.00 91282CCC3 0.69 US TREASURY N/B NOTES DTD 07/15/2021 0.375% 07/15/2024 4,937,500.00 5,005,709.59 8,661.68 5,006,640.63 08/03/2108/02/21AaaAA+ 5,000,000.00 91282CCL3 0.33 US TREASURY NOTES DTD 07/31/2019 1.750% 07/31/2024 5,796,689.35 5,889,871.50 41,523.51 5,995,139.06 10/07/2010/06/20AaaAA+ 5,670,000.00 912828Y87 0.24 US TREASURY N/B NOTES DTD 08/15/2021 0.375% 08/15/2024 3,946,875.20 3,996,667.83 5,665.76 3,996,250.00 09/03/2109/01/21AaaAA+ 4,000,000.00 91282CCT6 0.41 US TREASURY NOTES DTD 08/31/2019 1.250% 08/31/2024 2,265,345.31 2,304,982.73 9,535.05 2,325,942.78 01/26/2101/25/21AaaAA+ 2,245,000.00 912828YE4 0.24 US TREASURY N/B NOTES DTD 09/15/2021 0.375% 09/15/2024 1,380,093.68 1,395,325.67 1,566.30 1,394,914.06 10/06/2110/04/21AaaAA+ 1,400,000.00 91282CCX7 0.50 US TREASURY NOTES DTD 10/02/2017 2.125% 09/30/2024 6,195,000.00 6,313,973.11 32,575.55 6,457,968.75 09/28/2009/24/20AaaAA+ 6,000,000.00 9128282Y5 0.21 US TREASURY NOTES DTD 10/31/2019 1.500% 10/31/2024 2,539,062.50 2,583,692.29 6,422.65 2,616,796.88 11/18/2011/16/20AaaAA+ 2,500,000.00 912828YM6 0.31 US TREASURY NOTES DTD 11/30/2019 1.500% 11/30/2024 5,078,125.00 5,173,956.20 6,593.41 5,239,843.75 11/24/2011/23/20AaaAA+ 5,000,000.00 912828YV6 0.30 US TREASURY NOTES DTD 02/28/2018 2.750% 02/28/2025 6,321,562.80 6,474,577.14 56,063.54 6,663,750.00 09/28/2009/24/20AaaAA+ 6,000,000.00 9128283Z1 0.23 Account 73340000 Page 6 Page 27 For the Month Ending December 31, 2021Managed Account Detail of Securities Held CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000 Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTradeSettle Par U.S. Treasury Bond / Note US TREASURY NOTES DTD 03/31/2020 0.500% 03/31/2025 2,704,023.30 2,764,392.64 3,513.05 2,769,335.94 11/20/2011/17/20AaaAA+ 2,750,000.00 912828ZF0 0.34 US TREASURY NOTES DTD 07/31/2020 0.250% 07/31/2025 4,364,297.10 4,483,121.27 4,707.88 4,478,730.47 01/26/2101/25/21AaaAA+ 4,500,000.00 91282CAB7 0.36 US TREASURY NOTES DTD 07/31/2020 0.250% 07/31/2025 6,788,906.60 6,965,656.91 7,323.37 6,956,250.00 01/08/2101/06/21AaaAA+ 7,000,000.00 91282CAB7 0.39 US TREASURY NOTES DTD 12/31/2020 0.375% 12/31/2025 3,779,343.75 3,845,932.76 40.40 3,837,082.03 05/07/2105/06/21AaaAA+ 3,900,000.00 91282CBC4 0.73 US TREASURY NOTES DTD 01/31/2021 0.375% 01/31/2026 4,010,287.50 4,084,104.11 6,504.72 4,076,834.18 07/07/2107/06/21AaaAA+ 4,145,000.00 91282CBH3 0.74 US TREASURY NOTES DTD 01/31/2021 0.375% 01/31/2026 5,805,000.00 5,920,326.40 9,415.76 5,912,578.13 08/09/2108/06/21AaaAA+ 6,000,000.00 91282CBH3 0.71 US TREASURY NOTES DTD 02/28/2021 0.500% 02/28/2026 2,574,226.43 2,628,177.85 4,502.07 2,623,810.55 03/03/2103/02/21AaaAA+ 2,650,000.00 91282CBQ3 0.70 US TREASURY N/B NOTES DTD 03/31/2021 0.750% 03/31/2026 2,942,812.50 2,977,544.43 5,748.63 2,973,632.81 04/06/2104/02/21AaaAA+ 3,000,000.00 91282CBT7 0.93 US TREASURY N/B NOTES DTD 05/31/2021 0.750% 05/31/2026 5,975,140.32 6,088,201.55 4,021.98 6,086,656.25 06/04/2106/02/21AaaAA+ 6,100,000.00 91282CCF6 0.79 US TREASURY N/B NOTES DTD 07/31/2021 0.625% 07/31/2026 1,944,375.00 1,987,131.61 5,230.98 1,986,015.63 08/09/2108/06/21AaaAA+ 2,000,000.00 91282CCP4 0.77 US TREASURY N/B NOTES DTD 07/31/2021 0.625% 07/31/2026 2,916,562.50 2,992,691.31 7,846.47 2,992,031.25 08/03/2108/02/21AaaAA+ 3,000,000.00 91282CCP4 0.68 US TREASURY N/B NOTES DTD 10/31/2021 1.125% 10/31/2026 397,375.00 397,637.07 770.72 397,578.13 11/18/2111/17/21AaaAA+ 400,000.00 91282CDG3 1.25 US TREASURY N/B NOTES DTD 11/30/2021 1.250% 11/30/2026 2,893,642.82 2,903,123.95 3,181.32 2,903,255.27 12/03/2112/01/21AaaAA+ 2,895,000.00 91282CDK4 1.19 463,737.92 174,195,961.39 176,318,406.21 0.35 177,911,152.18 174,030,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total Account 73340000 Page 7 Page 28 For the Month Ending December 31, 2021Managed Account Detail of Securities Held CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000 Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTradeSettle Par Supra-National Agency Bond / Note INTL BK OF RECON AND DEV NOTE DTD 04/20/2021 0.126% 04/20/2023 1,735,130.28 1,742,654.58 433.63 1,741,387.85 04/20/2104/13/21AaaAAA 1,745,000.00 459058JV6 0.23 INTL BK RECON & DEVELOP NOTES DTD 11/24/2020 0.250% 11/24/2023 1,396,954.68 1,408,084.20 362.29 1,406,968.50 11/24/2011/17/20AaaAAA 1,410,000.00 459058JM6 0.32 INTER-AMERICAN DEVEL BK NOTES DTD 09/23/2021 0.500% 09/23/2024 3,706,981.06 3,752,474.83 5,110.97 3,752,221.30 09/23/2109/15/21AaaAAA 3,755,000.00 4581X0DZ8 0.52 INTER-AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK NOTES DTD 01/16/2020 1.750% 03/14/2025 1,531,102.50 1,560,728.11 7,802.08 1,576,950.00 02/23/2102/19/21AaaAAA 1,500,000.00 4581X0DK1 0.47 13,708.97 8,370,168.52 8,463,941.72 0.42 8,477,527.65 8,410,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total Municipal Bond / Note SAN MATEO-FOSTER SCH DIST, CA TXBL GO BO DTD 05/19/2020 1.162% 08/01/2022 502,310.00 500,606.47 2,420.83 502,300.00 05/19/2005/19/20AaaAA+ 500,000.00 799055QR2 0.95 SAN MATEO-FOSTER SCH DIST, CA TXBL GO BO DTD 05/19/2020 1.266% 08/01/2023 503,970.00 501,670.78 2,637.50 503,385.00 05/19/2005/19/20AaaAA+ 500,000.00 799055QS0 1.05 5,058.33 1,006,280.00 1,002,277.25 1.00 1,005,685.00 1,000,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total Federal Agency Bond / Note FANNIE MAE NOTES DTD 07/10/2020 0.250% 07/10/2023 4,236,574.26 4,260,652.22 5,058.75 4,261,192.80 09/28/2009/24/20AaaAA+ 4,260,000.00 3135G05G4 0.24 FREDDIE MAC NOTES DTD 09/04/2020 0.250% 09/08/2023 4,765,233.60 4,801,675.09 3,766.67 4,802,928.00 09/28/2009/24/20AaaAA+ 4,800,000.00 3137EAEW5 0.23 FREDDIE MAC NOTES DTD 11/05/2020 0.250% 11/06/2023 1,684,970.30 1,699,059.11 649.31 1,698,470.00 11/05/2011/03/20AaaAA+ 1,700,000.00 3137EAEZ8 0.28 FANNIE MAE NOTES DTD 11/25/2020 0.250% 11/27/2023 4,359,053.60 4,396,822.13 1,038.89 4,394,984.00 11/25/2011/23/20AaaAA+ 4,400,000.00 3135G06H1 0.29 Account 73340000 Page 8 Page 29 For the Month Ending December 31, 2021Managed Account Detail of Securities Held CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000 Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTradeSettle Par Federal Agency Bond / Note FANNIE MAE NOTES DTD 06/19/2020 0.500% 06/17/2025 2,836,489.16 2,899,794.92 562.92 2,901,803.25 07/21/2007/21/20AaaAA+ 2,895,000.00 3135G04Z3 0.45 FANNIE MAE NOTES DTD 06/19/2020 0.500% 06/17/2025 4,898,945.00 5,013,047.82 972.22 5,017,800.00 09/28/2009/24/20AaaAA+ 5,000,000.00 3135G04Z3 0.42 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK NOTES DTD 07/02/2020 0.500% 07/02/2025 2,935,098.00 3,005,028.54 7,458.33 3,007,110.00 07/21/2007/21/20AaaAA+ 3,000,000.00 3133ELR71 0.45 FANNIE MAE NOTES (CALLABLE) DTD 07/21/2020 0.625% 07/21/2025 2,454,740.00 2,499,289.70 6,944.44 2,499,000.00 07/21/2007/21/20AaaAA+ 2,500,000.00 3136G4ZJ5 0.63 FANNIE MAE NOTES DTD 08/27/2020 0.375% 08/25/2025 1,945,344.00 1,991,266.82 2,625.00 1,988,500.00 11/05/2010/30/20AaaAA+ 2,000,000.00 3135G05X7 0.50 FREDDIE MAC NOTES DTD 09/25/2020 0.375% 09/23/2025 2,235,011.20 2,294,834.32 2,347.92 2,293,077.00 09/25/2009/23/20AaaAA+ 2,300,000.00 3137EAEX3 0.44 FANNIE MAE NOTES DTD 11/12/2020 0.500% 11/07/2025 1,353,411.03 1,388,238.95 1,042.50 1,387,720.40 11/13/2011/12/20AaaAA+ 1,390,000.00 3135G06G3 0.53 FANNIE MAE NOTES DTD 11/12/2020 0.500% 11/07/2025 4,381,546.50 4,495,674.15 3,375.00 4,494,465.00 12/04/2012/02/20AaaAA+ 4,500,000.00 3135G06G3 0.53 35,841.95 38,086,416.65 38,745,383.77 0.39 38,747,050.45 38,745,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total Corporate Note APPLE INC GLOBAL NOTES DTD 05/03/2013 2.400% 05/03/2023 3,467,444.55 3,376,162.99 13,108.00 3,348,574.20 05/06/1905/06/19AaaAA+ 3,390,000.00 037833AK6 2.73 APPLE INC CORPORATE NOTES DTD 05/11/2020 0.750% 05/11/2023 1,442,386.08 1,442,141.65 1,500.00 1,444,737.60 05/11/2005/11/20AaaAA+ 1,440,000.00 037833DV9 0.64 APPLE INC (CALLABLE) BONDS DTD 02/09/2017 3.000% 02/09/2024 3,122,436.00 3,007,679.90 35,500.00 3,019,140.00 02/11/1902/11/19AaaAA+ 3,000,000.00 037833CG3 2.86 CHARLES SCHWAB CORP NOTES (CALLABLE) DTD 03/18/2021 0.750% 03/18/2024 656,978.52 659,757.02 1,416.25 659,670.00 03/18/2103/16/21A2A 660,000.00 808513BN4 0.77 Account 73340000 Page 9 Page 30 For the Month Ending December 31, 2021Managed Account Detail of Securities Held CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000 Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTradeSettle Par Corporate Note AMAZON.COM INC CORPORATE NOTES DTD 05/12/2021 0.450% 05/12/2024 1,439,852.00 1,453,329.25 891.19 1,452,875.70 05/12/2105/10/21A1AA 1,455,000.00 023135BW5 0.50 AMERICAN EXPRESS CO CORP NOTES (CALLABLE DTD 07/30/2019 2.500% 07/30/2024 1,779,761.85 1,784,219.79 18,088.54 1,786,755.00 11/23/2111/19/21A3BBB+ 1,725,000.00 025816CG2 1.14 UNILEVER CAPITAL CORP (CALLABLE) CORPORA DTD 08/12/2021 0.626% 08/12/2024 437,147.92 440,000.00 1,063.50 440,000.00 08/12/2108/09/21A1A+ 440,000.00 904764BN6 0.63 BMW US CAPITAL LLC CORPORATE NOTES DTD 08/12/2021 0.750% 08/12/2024 508,899.83 514,959.66 1,491.35 514,953.65 08/12/2108/09/21A2A 515,000.00 05565EBU8 0.75 US BANK NA CINCINNATI (CALLABLE) CORPORA DTD 01/21/2020 2.050% 01/21/2025 2,554,470.00 2,601,094.16 22,777.78 2,640,450.00 11/05/2010/30/20A1AA- 2,500,000.00 90331HPL1 0.69 NOVARTIS CAPITAL CORP DTD 02/14/2020 1.750% 02/14/2025 3,038,202.00 3,102,312.14 19,979.17 3,144,750.00 09/28/2009/24/20A1AA- 3,000,000.00 66989HAP3 0.63 JPMORGAN CHASE & CO CORP NOTES (CALLABLE DTD 02/16/2021 0.563% 02/16/2025 600,901.85 610,000.00 1,287.86 610,000.00 02/16/2102/09/21A2A- 610,000.00 46647PBY1 0.56 LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP NOTES (CALLABLE) DTD 02/20/2015 2.900% 03/01/2025 1,673,953.60 1,689,750.67 15,466.67 1,714,864.00 03/09/2103/05/21A3A- 1,600,000.00 539830BE8 1.05 GENERAL DYNAMICS CORP (CALLABLE) CORP NO DTD 05/11/2018 3.500% 05/15/2025 1,710,262.40 1,725,343.57 7,155.56 1,757,296.00 03/09/2103/05/21A3A- 1,600,000.00 369550BG2 1.09 CITIGROUP INC CORP NOTE (CALLABLE) DTD 11/03/2021 1.281% 11/03/2025 1,493,379.00 1,501,461.83 3,095.75 1,501,545.00 11/03/2111/01/21A3BBB+ 1,500,000.00 172967ND9 1.25 BANK OF NY MELLON CORP (CALLABLE) CORPOR DTD 01/28/2021 0.750% 01/28/2026 1,638,357.52 1,684,188.09 5,370.94 1,684,005.85 02/01/2101/28/21A1A 1,685,000.00 06406RAQ0 0.76 Account 73340000 Page 10 Page 31 For the Month Ending December 31, 2021Managed Account Detail of Securities Held CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000 Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTradeSettle Par Corporate Note GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC CORPORATE NOTES DTD 02/12/2021 0.855% 02/12/2026 1,857,533.10 1,903,199.14 6,272.38 1,903,876.00 02/17/2102/12/21A2BBB+ 1,900,000.00 38141GXS8 0.81 IBM CORP DTD 05/15/2019 3.300% 05/15/2026 1,790,238.33 1,832,976.38 7,062.92 1,844,861.75 09/03/2109/01/21A3A- 1,675,000.00 459200JZ5 1.08 ASTRAZENECA FINANCE LLC (CALLABLE) CORP DTD 05/28/2021 1.200% 05/28/2026 1,653,657.15 1,683,452.48 1,842.50 1,684,095.25 09/03/2109/01/21A3A- 1,675,000.00 04636NAA1 1.08 TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP CORPORATE NOTES DTD 06/18/2021 1.125% 06/18/2026 1,086,143.18 1,102,702.07 448.91 1,102,546.90 09/13/2109/08/21A1A+ 1,105,000.00 89236TJK2 1.17 MORGAN STANLEY CORP NOTES DTD 07/25/2016 3.125% 07/27/2026 1,058,981.00 1,060,190.94 13,368.06 1,062,320.00 11/03/2111/01/21A1BBB+ 1,000,000.00 61761J3R8 1.75 AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORPORATE NOTES DTD 09/09/2021 1.300% 09/09/2026 1,971,948.00 1,971,227.39 8,088.89 1,970,740.00 12/03/2112/01/21A3A- 2,000,000.00 02665WDZ1 1.62 CATERPILLAR FINL SERVICE CORPORATE NOTES DTD 09/14/2021 1.150% 09/14/2026 1,964,774.00 1,968,177.48 6,836.11 1,967,640.00 12/03/2112/01/21A2A 2,000,000.00 14913R2Q9 1.50 JPMORGAN CHASE & CO CORP NOTES DTD 07/21/2016 2.950% 10/01/2026 1,055,981.00 1,055,544.20 7,375.00 1,057,540.00 11/03/2111/01/21A2A- 1,000,000.00 46625HRV4 1.72 199,487.33 38,003,688.88 38,169,870.80 1.32 38,313,236.90 37,475,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total Certificate of Deposit - FDIC Insured WELLS FARGO BANK NA DTD 01/29/2020 1.900% 01/30/2023 249,022.17 245,000.00 38.26 245,000.00 01/29/2001/29/20NRNR 245,000.00 949763S64 1.90 MORGAN STANLEY PVT BANK DTD 01/30/2020 1.850% 01/30/2023 248,867.08 245,000.00 1,924.76 245,000.00 01/30/2001/30/20NRNR 245,000.00 61760A6Q7 1.85 ENERBANK USA DTD 07/24/2020 0.450% 07/24/2024 242,636.24 245,000.00 24.16 245,000.00 07/24/2007/24/20NRNR 245,000.00 29278TQD5 0.45 Account 73340000 Page 11 Page 32 For the Month Ending December 31, 2021Managed Account Detail of Securities Held CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000 Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTradeSettle Par Certificate of Deposit - FDIC Insured CHIPPEWA VALLEY BANK DTD 07/29/2020 0.500% 07/29/2025 240,204.37 245,000.00 10.07 245,000.00 07/29/2007/29/20NRNR 245,000.00 169894AT9 0.50 MEDALLION BANK UTAH DTD 07/30/2020 0.550% 07/30/2025 240,625.04 245,000.00 7.38 245,000.00 07/30/2007/30/20NRNR 245,000.00 58404DHQ7 0.55 2,004.63 1,221,354.90 1,225,000.00 1.06 1,225,000.00 1,225,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total Asset-Backed Security MBALT 2021-A A3 DTD 01/27/2021 0.250% 01/16/2024 179,444.52 179,987.49 20.00 179,981.80 01/27/2101/20/21AaaAAA 180,000.00 58770GAC4 0.25 HALST 2021-A A4 DTD 01/20/2021 0.420% 12/16/2024 278,531.93 279,982.35 52.27 279,976.70 01/20/2101/12/21AaaAAA 280,000.00 44891TAD8 0.42 GMALT 2021-1 A4 DTD 02/24/2021 0.330% 02/20/2025 511,756.12 514,938.84 51.93 514,922.24 02/24/2102/17/21AaaNR 515,000.00 36261RAD0 0.33 HAROT 2021-1 A3 DTD 02/24/2021 0.270% 04/21/2025 526,439.25 529,992.29 39.75 529,990.30 02/24/2102/17/21AaaNR 530,000.00 43813GAC5 0.27 HART 2021-A A3 DTD 04/28/2021 0.380% 09/15/2025 534,704.98 539,951.99 91.20 539,943.19 04/28/2104/20/21NRAAA 540,000.00 44933LAC7 0.38 GMCAR 2021-1 A3 DTD 01/20/2021 0.350% 10/16/2025 372,612.38 374,952.24 54.69 374,940.30 01/20/2101/12/21AaaAAA 375,000.00 36261LAC5 0.35 KCOT 2021-2A A3 DTD 07/28/2021 0.560% 11/17/2025 911,311.03 924,968.61 230.22 924,965.13 07/28/2107/20/21AaaNR 925,000.00 50117XAE2 0.56 CARMX 2021-1 A3 DTD 01/27/2021 0.340% 12/15/2025 118,975.82 119,980.80 18.13 119,976.29 01/27/2101/20/21NRAAA 120,000.00 14316NAC3 0.34 HAROT 2021-4 A3 DTD 11/24/2021 0.880% 01/21/2026 743,416.35 744,846.88 182.11 744,842.95 11/24/2111/16/21AaaNR 745,000.00 43815GAC3 0.89 CARMX 2021-2 A3 DTD 04/21/2021 0.520% 02/17/2026 803,110.46 809,850.70 187.20 809,825.45 04/21/2104/13/21NRAAA 810,000.00 14314QAC8 0.52 Account 73340000 Page 12 Page 33 For the Month Ending December 31, 2021Managed Account Detail of Securities Held CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000 Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTradeSettle Par Asset-Backed Security CARMX 2021-3 A3 DTD 07/28/2021 0.550% 06/15/2026 1,518,204.01 1,529,770.48 374.00 1,529,748.32 07/28/2107/21/21AaaAAA 1,530,000.00 14317DAC4 0.55 VALET 2021-1 A3 DTD 12/13/2021 1.020% 06/22/2026 1,025,066.63 1,024,960.28 319.46 1,024,959.82 12/13/2112/07/21AaaAAA 1,025,000.00 92868KAC7 1.02 COMET 2021-A3 A3 DTD 11/30/2021 1.040% 11/16/2026 1,857,227.80 1,864,747.54 1,670.21 1,864,743.00 11/30/2111/18/21NRAAA 1,865,000.00 14041NFY2 1.04 3,291.17 9,380,801.28 9,438,930.49 0.67 9,438,815.49 9,440,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total 270,325,000.00 275,118,467.67 0.51 723,130.30 273,363,810.24 270,264,671.62 Managed Account Sub-Total $270,325,000.00 $275,118,467.67 $723,130.30 $273,363,810.24 $270,264,671.62 0.51% $270,987,801.92 $723,130.30 Total Investments Accrued Interest Securities Sub-Total Account 73340000 Page 13 Page 34 For the Month Ending December 31, 2021Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000 Value On Cost Amort CostCUSIPBrokerDatePriceDated Date/Coupon/Maturity Par at Mkt Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/LNext Call MarketSecurity Type/Description YTMEffective Duration U.S. Treasury Bond / Note (5,040.47)(54,140.62) 3,175,593.75 100.81 CITIGRP 3,150,000.00 912828YK0US TREASURY NOTES DTD 10/15/2019 1.375% 10/15/2022 0.34 0.79 (5,632.05)(49,765.62) 2,627,625.00 101.06 CITIGRP 2,600,000.00 912828TY6US TREASURY NOTES DTD 11/15/2012 1.625% 11/15/2022 0.40 0.87 (20,252.05)(173,250.42) 8,522,062.08 101.45 CITIGRP 8,400,000.00 912828M80US TREASURY NOTES DTD 11/30/2015 2.000% 11/30/2022 0.41 0.91 (13,731.21)(121,484.13) 5,083,594.00 101.67 NOMURA 5,000,000.00 912828N30US TREASURY NOTES DTD 12/31/2015 2.125% 12/31/2022 0.45 1.00 (7,155.04)(65,531.25) 2,449,500.00 102.06 CITIGRP 2,400,000.00 9128283U2US TREASURY NOTES DTD 01/31/2018 2.375% 01/31/2023 0.47 1.07 (6,287.64)(55,572.65) 1,854,684.38 102.47 CITIGRP 1,810,000.00 9128284A5US TREASURY NOTES DTD 02/28/2018 2.625% 02/28/2023 0.49 1.14 (28,933.14)(118,124.65) 7,082,031.60 101.17 BNP_PAR 7,000,000.00 912828P79US TREASURY NOTES DTD 02/29/2016 1.500% 02/28/2023 0.49 1.15 (19,412.04)(38,867.44) 5,000,781.00 100.02 WELLS_F 5,000,000.00 912828ZD5US TREASURY NOTES DTD 03/15/2020 0.500% 03/15/2023 0.49 1.20 (24,668.87)(183,788.81) 5,146,094.00 102.92 CITIGRP 5,000,000.00 9128284L1US TREASURY NOTES DTD 04/30/2018 2.750% 04/30/2023 0.54 1.31 (19,734.31)(78,476.39) 3,551,953.30 101.48 NOMURA 3,500,000.00 912828R69US TREASURY NOTES DTD 05/31/2016 1.625% 05/31/2023 0.57 1.40 (40,255.68)(48,750.00) 6,469,531.25 99.53 WELLS_F 6,500,000.00 912828ZU7US TREASURY NOTES DTD 06/15/2020 0.250% 06/15/2023 0.57 1.45 (39,948.72)(37,969.05) 5,952,187.20 99.20 MERRILL 6,000,000.00 91282CCN9US TREASURY N/B NOTES DTD 07/31/2021 0.125% 07/31/2023 0.63 1.58 (36,753.37)(33,202.88) 4,958,594.00 99.17 HSBC 5,000,000.00 91282CAF8US TREASURY NOTES DTD 08/15/2020 0.125% 08/15/2023 0.64 1.62 (39,101.24)(34,570.56) 4,953,906.00 99.08 NOMURA 5,000,000.00 91282CAK7US TREASURY NOTES DTD 09/15/2020 0.125% 09/15/2023 0.67 1.70 (13,306.30)(13,203.03) 1,985,937.60 99.30 NOMURA 2,000,000.00 91282CDA6US TREASURY NOTES DTD 09/30/2021 0.250% 09/30/2023 0.66 1.74 (18,244.50)(16,875.00) 5,966,250.00 99.44 CITIGRP 6,000,000.00 91282CDD0US TREASURY N/B NOTES DTD 10/31/2021 0.375% 10/31/2023 0.68 1.83 (106,720.63)(327,812.50) 8,272,500.00 103.41 RBS 8,000,000.00 9128286G0US TREASURY NOTES DTD 02/28/2019 2.375% 02/29/2024 0.78 2.11 Account 73340000 Page 14 Page 35 For the Month Ending December 31, 2021Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000 Value On Cost Amort CostCUSIPBrokerDatePriceDated Date/Coupon/Maturity Par at Mkt Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/LNext Call MarketSecurity Type/Description YTMEffective Duration U.S. Treasury Bond / Note (50,620.30)(124,265.80) 3,712,717.79 102.70 MORGAN_ 3,615,000.00 912828X70US TREASURY NOTES DTD 05/01/2017 2.000% 04/30/2024 0.83 2.28 (6,096.00)(4,750.10) 1,874,171.78 98.64 CITIGRP 1,900,000.00 91282CCC3US TREASURY N/B NOTES DTD 05/15/2021 0.250% 05/15/2024 0.83 2.37 (68,209.59)(69,140.63) 4,937,500.00 98.75 NOMURA 5,000,000.00 91282CCL3US TREASURY N/B NOTES DTD 07/15/2021 0.375% 07/15/2024 0.87 2.53 (93,182.15)(198,449.71) 5,796,689.35 102.23 WELLS_F 5,670,000.00 912828Y87US TREASURY NOTES DTD 07/31/2019 1.750% 07/31/2024 0.87 2.52 (49,792.63)(49,374.80) 3,946,875.20 98.67 NOMURA 4,000,000.00 91282CCT6US TREASURY N/B NOTES DTD 08/15/2021 0.375% 08/15/2024 0.89 2.61 (39,637.42)(60,597.47) 2,265,345.31 100.91 BNP_PAR 2,245,000.00 912828YE4US TREASURY NOTES DTD 08/31/2019 1.250% 08/31/2024 0.90 2.62 (15,231.99)(14,820.38) 1,380,093.68 98.58 MERRILL 1,400,000.00 91282CCX7US TREASURY N/B NOTES DTD 09/15/2021 0.375% 09/15/2024 0.91 2.69 (118,973.11)(262,968.75) 6,195,000.00 103.25 CITIGRP 6,000,000.00 9128282Y5US TREASURY NOTES DTD 10/02/2017 2.125% 09/30/2024 0.92 2.67 (44,629.79)(77,734.38) 2,539,062.50 101.56 CITIGRP 2,500,000.00 912828YM6US TREASURY NOTES DTD 10/31/2019 1.500% 10/31/2024 0.94 2.78 (95,831.20)(161,718.75) 5,078,125.00 101.56 NOMURA 5,000,000.00 912828YV6US TREASURY NOTES DTD 11/30/2019 1.500% 11/30/2024 0.96 2.86 (153,014.34)(342,187.20) 6,321,562.80 105.36 MERRILL 6,000,000.00 9128283Z1US TREASURY NOTES DTD 02/28/2018 2.750% 02/28/2025 1.02 3.03 (60,369.34)(65,312.64) 2,704,023.30 98.33 MORGAN_ 2,750,000.00 912828ZF0US TREASURY NOTES DTD 03/31/2020 0.500% 03/31/2025 1.02 3.22 (118,824.17)(114,433.37) 4,364,297.10 96.98 BNP_PAR 4,500,000.00 91282CAB7US TREASURY NOTES DTD 07/31/2020 0.250% 07/31/2025 1.11 3.57 (176,750.31)(167,343.40) 6,788,906.60 96.98 JPM_CHA 7,000,000.00 91282CAB7US TREASURY NOTES DTD 07/31/2020 0.250% 07/31/2025 1.11 3.57 (66,589.01)(57,738.28) 3,779,343.75 96.91 HSBC 3,900,000.00 91282CBC4US TREASURY NOTES DTD 12/31/2020 0.375% 12/31/2025 1.17 3.97 (73,816.61)(66,546.68) 4,010,287.50 96.75 CITIGRP 4,145,000.00 91282CBH3US TREASURY NOTES DTD 01/31/2021 0.375% 01/31/2026 1.19 4.05 (115,326.40)(107,578.13) 5,805,000.00 96.75 RBS 6,000,000.00 91282CBH3US TREASURY NOTES DTD 01/31/2021 0.375% 01/31/2026 1.19 4.05 Account 73340000 Page 15 Page 36 For the Month Ending December 31, 2021Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000 Value On Cost Amort CostCUSIPBrokerDatePriceDated Date/Coupon/Maturity Par at Mkt Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/LNext Call MarketSecurity Type/Description YTMEffective Duration U.S. Treasury Bond / Note (53,951.42)(49,584.12) 2,574,226.43 97.14 CITIGRP 2,650,000.00 91282CBQ3US TREASURY NOTES DTD 02/28/2021 0.500% 02/28/2026 1.21 4.12 (34,731.93)(30,820.31) 2,942,812.50 98.09 NOMURA 3,000,000.00 91282CBT7US TREASURY N/B NOTES DTD 03/31/2021 0.750% 03/31/2026 1.21 4.18 (113,061.23)(111,515.93) 5,975,140.32 97.95 RBC 6,100,000.00 91282CCF6US TREASURY N/B NOTES DTD 05/31/2021 0.750% 05/31/2026 1.23 4.35 (42,756.61)(41,640.63) 1,944,375.00 97.22 CITIGRP 2,000,000.00 91282CCP4US TREASURY N/B NOTES DTD 07/31/2021 0.625% 07/31/2026 1.25 4.51 (76,128.81)(75,468.75) 2,916,562.50 97.22 CITIGRP 3,000,000.00 91282CCP4US TREASURY N/B NOTES DTD 07/31/2021 0.625% 07/31/2026 1.25 4.51 (262.07)(203.13) 397,375.00 99.34 CITIGRP 400,000.00 91282CDG3US TREASURY N/B NOTES DTD 10/31/2021 1.125% 10/31/2026 1.27 4.71 (9,481.13)(9,612.45) 2,893,642.82 99.95 NOMURA 2,895,000.00 91282CDK4US TREASURY N/B NOTES DTD 11/30/2021 1.250% 11/30/2026 1.26 4.78 (3,715,190.79) 0.82 (2,122,444.82) 174,195,961.39 174,030,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total 2.42 Supra-National Agency Bond / Note (7,524.30)(6,257.57) 1,735,130.28 99.43 TD 1,745,000.00 459058JV6INTL BK OF RECON AND DEV NOTE DTD 04/20/2021 0.126% 04/20/2023 0.56 1.30 (11,129.52)(10,013.82) 1,396,954.68 99.07 TD 1,410,000.00 459058JM6INTL BK RECON & DEVELOP NOTES DTD 11/24/2020 0.250% 11/24/2023 0.74 1.90 (45,493.77)(45,240.24) 3,706,981.06 98.72 JPM_CHA 3,755,000.00 4581X0DZ8INTER-AMERICAN DEVEL BK NOTES DTD 09/23/2021 0.500% 09/23/2024 0.98 2.71 (29,625.61)(45,847.50) 1,531,102.50 102.07 MORGAN_ 1,500,000.00 4581X0DK1INTER-AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK NOTES DTD 01/16/2020 1.750% 03/14/2025 1.09 3.12 (107,359.13) 0.87 (93,773.20) 8,370,168.52 8,410,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total 2.36 Municipal Bond / Note 1,703.53 10.00 502,310.00 100.46 NEW ACC 500,000.00 799055QR2SAN MATEO-FOSTER SCH DIST, CA TXBL GO BO DTD 05/19/2020 1.162% 08/01/2022 0.37 0.58 Account 73340000 Page 16 Page 37 For the Month Ending December 31, 2021Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000 Value On Cost Amort CostCUSIPBrokerDatePriceDated Date/Coupon/Maturity Par at Mkt Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/LNext Call MarketSecurity Type/Description YTMEffective Duration Municipal Bond / Note 2,299.22 585.00 503,970.00 100.79 NEW ACC 500,000.00 799055QS0SAN MATEO-FOSTER SCH DIST, CA TXBL GO BO DTD 05/19/2020 1.266% 08/01/2023 0.76 1.57 595.00 0.57 4,002.75 1,006,280.00 1,000,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total 1.08 Federal Agency Bond / Note (24,077.96)(24,618.54) 4,236,574.26 99.45 MORGAN_ 4,260,000.00 3135G05G4FANNIE MAE NOTES DTD 07/10/2020 0.250% 07/10/2023 0.61 1.52 (36,441.49)(37,694.40) 4,765,233.60 99.28 KEYBANC 4,800,000.00 3137EAEW5FREDDIE MAC NOTES DTD 09/04/2020 0.250% 09/08/2023 0.68 1.68 (14,088.81)(13,499.70) 1,684,970.30 99.12 CITIGRP 1,700,000.00 3137EAEZ8FREDDIE MAC NOTES DTD 11/05/2020 0.250% 11/06/2023 0.73 1.85 (37,768.53)(35,930.40) 4,359,053.60 99.07 NOMURA 4,400,000.00 3135G06H1FANNIE MAE NOTES DTD 11/25/2020 0.250% 11/27/2023 0.74 1.91 (63,305.76)(65,314.09) 2,836,489.16 97.98 NEW ACC 2,895,000.00 3135G04Z3FANNIE MAE NOTES DTD 06/19/2020 0.500% 06/17/2025 1.10 3.44 (114,102.82)(118,855.00) 4,898,945.00 97.98 HSBC 5,000,000.00 3135G04Z3FANNIE MAE NOTES DTD 06/19/2020 0.500% 06/17/2025 1.10 3.44 (69,930.54)(72,012.00) 2,935,098.00 97.84 NEW ACC 3,000,000.00 3133ELR71FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK NOTES DTD 07/02/2020 0.500% 07/02/2025 1.13 3.47 (44,549.70)(44,260.00) 2,454,740.00 98.19 07/21/22NEW ACC 2,500,000.00 3136G4ZJ5FANNIE MAE NOTES (CALLABLE) DTD 07/21/2020 0.625% 07/21/2025 1.15 0.56 (45,922.82)(43,156.00) 1,945,344.00 97.27 NOMURA 2,000,000.00 3135G05X7FANNIE MAE NOTES DTD 08/27/2020 0.375% 08/25/2025 1.14 3.63 (59,823.12)(58,065.80) 2,235,011.20 97.17 CITIGRP 2,300,000.00 3137EAEX3FREDDIE MAC NOTES DTD 09/25/2020 0.375% 09/23/2025 1.15 3.70 (34,827.92)(34,309.37) 1,353,411.03 97.37 BMO 1,390,000.00 3135G06G3FANNIE MAE NOTES DTD 11/12/2020 0.500% 11/07/2025 1.20 3.82 (114,127.65)(112,918.50) 4,381,546.50 97.37 JEFFERI 4,500,000.00 3135G06G3FANNIE MAE NOTES DTD 11/12/2020 0.500% 11/07/2025 1.20 3.82 (660,633.80) 0.96 (658,967.12) 38,086,416.65 38,745,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total 2.66 Account 73340000 Page 17 Page 38 For the Month Ending December 31, 2021Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000 Value On Cost Amort CostCUSIPBrokerDatePriceDated Date/Coupon/Maturity Par at Mkt Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/LNext Call MarketSecurity Type/Description YTMEffective Duration Corporate Note 91,281.56 118,870.35 3,467,444.55 102.28 NEW ACC 3,390,000.00 037833AK6APPLE INC GLOBAL NOTES DTD 05/03/2013 2.400% 05/03/2023 0.69 1.32 244.43 (2,351.52) 1,442,386.08 100.17 NEW ACC 1,440,000.00 037833DV9APPLE INC CORPORATE NOTES DTD 05/11/2020 0.750% 05/11/2023 0.63 1.36 114,756.10 103,296.00 3,122,436.00 104.08 12/09/23NEW ACC 3,000,000.00 037833CG3APPLE INC (CALLABLE) BONDS DTD 02/09/2017 3.000% 02/09/2024 1.04 1.88 (2,778.50)(2,691.48) 656,978.52 99.54 02/18/24CSFB 660,000.00 808513BN4CHARLES SCHWAB CORP NOTES (CALLABLE) DTD 03/18/2021 0.750% 03/18/2024 0.96 2.12 (13,477.25)(13,023.70) 1,439,852.00 98.96 JPM_CHA 1,455,000.00 023135BW5AMAZON.COM INC CORPORATE NOTES DTD 05/12/2021 0.450% 05/12/2024 0.90 2.36 (4,457.94)(6,993.15) 1,779,761.85 103.17 06/30/24MORGAN_ 1,725,000.00 025816CG2AMERICAN EXPRESS CO CORP NOTES (CALLABLE DTD 07/30/2019 2.500% 07/30/2024 1.25 2.42 (2,852.08)(2,852.08) 437,147.92 99.35 08/12/22DEUTSCH 440,000.00 904764BN6UNILEVER CAPITAL CORP (CALLABLE) CORPORA DTD 08/12/2021 0.626% 08/12/2024 0.88 0.62 (6,059.83)(6,053.82) 508,899.83 98.82 GOLDMAN 515,000.00 05565EBU8BMW US CAPITAL LLC CORPORATE NOTES DTD 08/12/2021 0.750% 08/12/2024 1.21 2.59 (46,624.16)(85,980.00) 2,554,470.00 102.18 12/20/24US_BANC 2,500,000.00 90331HPL1US BANK NA CINCINNATI (CALLABLE) CORPORA DTD 01/21/2020 2.050% 01/21/2025 1.32 2.87 (64,110.14)(106,548.00) 3,038,202.00 101.27 01/14/25US_BANC 3,000,000.00 66989HAP3NOVARTIS CAPITAL CORP DTD 02/14/2020 1.750% 02/14/2025 1.33 2.95 (9,098.15)(9,098.15) 600,901.85 98.51 02/16/24JPM_CHA 610,000.00 46647PBY1JPMORGAN CHASE & CO CORP NOTES (CALLABLE DTD 02/16/2021 0.563% 02/16/2025 1.05 2.11 (15,797.07)(40,910.40) 1,673,953.60 104.62 12/01/24MERRILL 1,600,000.00 539830BE8LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP NOTES (CALLABLE) DTD 02/20/2015 2.900% 03/01/2025 1.40 2.80 (15,081.17)(47,033.60) 1,710,262.40 106.89 03/15/25SUSQ 1,600,000.00 369550BG2GENERAL DYNAMICS CORP (CALLABLE) CORP NO DTD 05/11/2018 3.500% 05/15/2025 1.40 3.06 Account 73340000 Page 18 Page 39 For the Month Ending December 31, 2021Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000 Value On Cost Amort CostCUSIPBrokerDatePriceDated Date/Coupon/Maturity Par at Mkt Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/LNext Call MarketSecurity Type/Description YTMEffective Duration Corporate Note (8,082.83)(8,166.00) 1,493,379.00 99.56 11/03/24MORGAN_ 1,500,000.00 172967ND9CITIGROUP INC CORP NOTE (CALLABLE) DTD 11/03/2021 1.281% 11/03/2025 1.40 2.79 (45,830.57)(45,648.33) 1,638,357.52 97.23 12/28/25MITSU 1,685,000.00 06406RAQ0BANK OF NY MELLON CORP (CALLABLE) CORPOR DTD 01/28/2021 0.750% 01/28/2026 1.45 3.93 (45,666.04)(46,342.90) 1,857,533.10 97.76 MERRILL 1,900,000.00 38141GXS8GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC CORPORATE NOTES DTD 02/12/2021 0.855% 02/12/2026 1.42 4.04 (42,738.05)(54,623.42) 1,790,238.33 106.88 MORGAN_ 1,675,000.00 459200JZ5IBM CORP DTD 05/15/2019 3.300% 05/15/2026 1.66 4.10 (29,795.33)(30,438.10) 1,653,657.15 98.73 04/28/26MORGAN_ 1,675,000.00 04636NAA1ASTRAZENECA FINANCE LLC (CALLABLE) CORP DTD 05/28/2021 1.200% 05/28/2026 1.50 4.22 (16,558.89)(16,403.72) 1,086,143.18 98.29 JPM_CHA 1,105,000.00 89236TJK2TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP CORPORATE NOTES DTD 06/18/2021 1.125% 06/18/2026 1.52 4.37 (1,209.94)(3,339.00) 1,058,981.00 105.90 SUSQ 1,000,000.00 61761J3R8MORGAN STANLEY CORP NOTES DTD 07/25/2016 3.125% 07/27/2026 1.78 4.25 720.61 1,208.00 1,971,948.00 98.60 RBC 2,000,000.00 02665WDZ1AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORPORATE NOTES DTD 09/09/2021 1.300% 09/09/2026 1.61 4.55 (3,403.48)(2,866.00) 1,964,774.00 98.24 LOOP 2,000,000.00 14913R2Q9CATERPILLAR FINL SERVICE CORPORATE NOTES DTD 09/14/2021 1.150% 09/14/2026 1.54 4.58 436.80 (1,559.00) 1,055,981.00 105.60 07/01/26SUSQ 1,000,000.00 46625HRV4JPMORGAN CHASE & CO CORP NOTES DTD 07/21/2016 2.950% 10/01/2026 1.72 4.23 (309,548.02) 1.28 (166,181.92) 38,003,688.88 37,475,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total 3.02 Certificate of Deposit - FDIC Insured 4,022.17 4,022.17 249,022.17 101.64 NEW ACC 245,000.00 949763S64WELLS FARGO BANK NA DTD 01/29/2020 1.900% 01/30/2023 0.38 1.07 3,867.08 3,867.08 248,867.08 101.58 NEW ACC 245,000.00 61760A6Q7MORGAN STANLEY PVT BANK DTD 01/30/2020 1.850% 01/30/2023 0.39 1.07 Account 73340000 Page 19 Page 40 For the Month Ending December 31, 2021Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000 Value On Cost Amort CostCUSIPBrokerDatePriceDated Date/Coupon/Maturity Par at Mkt Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/LNext Call MarketSecurity Type/Description YTMEffective Duration Certificate of Deposit - FDIC Insured (2,363.76)(2,363.76) 242,636.24 99.04 NEW ACC 245,000.00 29278TQD5ENERBANK USA DTD 07/24/2020 0.450% 07/24/2024 0.83 2.55 (4,795.63)(4,795.63) 240,204.37 98.04 NEW ACC 245,000.00 169894AT9CHIPPEWA VALLEY BANK DTD 07/29/2020 0.500% 07/29/2025 1.06 3.55 (4,374.96)(4,374.96) 240,625.04 98.21 NEW ACC 245,000.00 58404DHQ7MEDALLION BANK UTAH DTD 07/30/2020 0.550% 07/30/2025 1.06 3.55 (3,645.10) 0.74 (3,645.10) 1,221,354.90 1,225,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total 2.34 Asset-Backed Security (542.97)(537.28) 179,444.52 99.69 MITSU 180,000.00 58770GAC4MBALT 2021-A A3 DTD 01/27/2021 0.250% 01/16/2024 0.40 0.96 (1,450.42)(1,444.77) 278,531.93 99.48 SOCGEN 280,000.00 44891TAD8HALST 2021-A A4 DTD 01/20/2021 0.420% 12/16/2024 0.60 1.36 (3,182.72)(3,166.12) 511,756.12 99.37 RBC 515,000.00 36261RAD0GMALT 2021-1 A4 DTD 02/24/2021 0.330% 02/20/2025 0.53 1.48 (3,553.04)(3,551.05) 526,439.25 99.33 JPM_CHA 530,000.00 43813GAC5HAROT 2021-1 A3 DTD 02/24/2021 0.270% 04/21/2025 0.47 1.16 (5,247.01)(5,238.21) 534,704.98 99.02 BARCLAY 540,000.00 44933LAC7HART 2021-A A3 DTD 04/28/2021 0.380% 09/15/2025 0.65 1.53 (2,339.86)(2,327.92) 372,612.38 99.36 DEUTSCH 375,000.00 36261LAC5GMCAR 2021-1 A3 DTD 01/20/2021 0.350% 10/16/2025 0.52 1.17 (13,657.58)(13,654.10) 911,311.03 98.52 MITSU 925,000.00 50117XAE2KCOT 2021-2A A3 DTD 07/28/2021 0.560% 11/17/2025 0.95 2.36 (1,004.98)(1,000.47) 118,975.82 99.15 MITSU 120,000.00 14316NAC3CARMX 2021-1 A3 DTD 01/27/2021 0.340% 12/15/2025 0.56 1.20 (1,430.53)(1,426.60) 743,416.35 99.79 MERRILL 745,000.00 43815GAC3HAROT 2021-4 A3 DTD 11/24/2021 0.880% 01/21/2026 0.93 2.16 (6,740.24)(6,714.99) 803,110.46 99.15 MERRILL 810,000.00 14314QAC8CARMX 2021-2 A3 DTD 04/21/2021 0.520% 02/17/2026 0.73 1.29 (11,566.47)(11,544.31) 1,518,204.01 99.23 RBC 1,530,000.00 14317DAC4CARMX 2021-3 A3 DTD 07/28/2021 0.550% 06/15/2026 0.73 2.14 106.35 106.81 1,025,066.63 100.01 WELLS_F 1,025,000.00 92868KAC7VALET 2021-1 A3 DTD 12/13/2021 1.020% 06/22/2026 1.02 2.10 Account 73340000 Page 20 Page 41 For the Month Ending December 31, 2021Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000 Value On Cost Amort CostCUSIPBrokerDatePriceDated Date/Coupon/Maturity Par at Mkt Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/LNext Call MarketSecurity Type/Description YTMEffective Duration Asset-Backed Security (7,519.74)(7,515.20) 1,857,227.80 99.58 BARCLAY 1,865,000.00 14041NFY2COMET 2021-A3 A3 DTD 11/30/2021 1.040% 11/16/2026 1.13 2.82 (58,014.21) 0.83 (58,129.21) 9,380,801.28 9,440,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total 2.00 270,325,000.00 270,264,671.62 (4,853,796.05)(3,099,138.62) 0.90 Managed Account Sub-Total 2.52 Total Investments $270,987,801.92 $723,130.30 $270,264,671.62 Accrued Interest Securities Sub-Total $270,325,000.00 ($4,853,796.05)($3,099,138.62) 0.90% 2.52 Account 73340000 Page 21 Page 42 For the Month Ending December 31, 2021Managed Account Security Transactions & Interest CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000 Transaction Type Trade CUSIPSecurity DescriptionSettle Par Proceeds Principal Accrued Interest Total Cost Realized G/L Realized G/L Sale Amort Cost Method BUY 12/03/21 US TREASURY N/B NOTES DTD 11/30/2021 1.250% 11/30/2026 91282CDK4 (2,903,255.27)(298.25)(2,903,553.52) 2,895,000.00 12/01/21 12/03/21 AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORPORATE NOTES DTD 09/09/2021 1.300% 09/09/2026 02665WDZ1 (1,970,740.00)(6,066.67)(1,976,806.67) 2,000,000.00 12/01/21 12/03/21 CATERPILLAR FINL SERVICE CORPORATE NOTES DTD 09/14/2021 1.150% 09/14/2026 14913R2Q9 (1,967,640.00)(5,047.22)(1,972,687.22) 2,000,000.00 12/01/21 12/13/21 VALET 2021-1 A3 DTD 12/13/2021 1.020% 06/22/2026 92868KAC7 (1,024,959.82) 0.00 (1,024,959.82) 1,025,000.00 12/07/21 (11,412.14)(7,878,007.23)(7,866,595.09) 7,920,000.00 Transaction Type Sub-Total INTEREST 12/15/21 MBALT 2021-A A3 DTD 01/27/2021 0.250% 01/16/2024 58770GAC4 0.00 37.50 37.50 180,000.00 12/15/21 12/15/21 KCOT 2021-2A A3 DTD 07/28/2021 0.560% 11/17/2025 50117XAE2 0.00 431.67 431.67 925,000.00 12/15/21 12/15/21 CARMX 2021-1 A3 DTD 01/27/2021 0.340% 12/15/2025 14316NAC3 0.00 34.00 34.00 120,000.00 12/15/21 12/15/21 CARMX 2021-3 A3 DTD 07/28/2021 0.550% 06/15/2026 14317DAC4 0.00 701.25 701.25 1,530,000.00 12/15/21 12/15/21 HART 2021-A A3 DTD 04/28/2021 0.380% 09/15/2025 44933LAC7 0.00 171.00 171.00 540,000.00 12/15/21 12/15/21 US TREASURY NOTES DTD 06/15/2020 0.250% 06/15/2023 912828ZU7 0.00 8,125.00 8,125.00 6,500,000.00 12/15/21 12/15/21 CARMX 2021-2 A3 DTD 04/21/2021 0.520% 02/17/2026 14314QAC8 0.00 351.00 351.00 810,000.00 12/15/21 12/15/21 HALST 2021-A A4 DTD 01/20/2021 0.420% 12/16/2024 44891TAD8 0.00 98.00 98.00 280,000.00 12/15/21 12/16/21 GMCAR 2021-1 A3 DTD 01/20/2021 0.350% 10/16/2025 36261LAC5 0.00 109.38 109.38 375,000.00 12/16/21 12/17/21 FANNIE MAE NOTES DTD 06/19/2020 0.500% 06/17/2025 3135G04Z3 0.00 19,737.50 19,737.50 7,895,000.00 12/17/21 Account 73340000 Page 22 Page 43 For the Month Ending December 31, 2021Managed Account Security Transactions & Interest CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000 Transaction Type Trade CUSIPSecurity DescriptionSettle Par Proceeds Principal Accrued Interest Total Cost Realized G/L Realized G/L Sale Amort Cost Method INTEREST 12/18/21 TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP CORPORATE NOTES DTD 06/18/2021 1.125% 06/18/2026 89236TJK2 0.00 6,215.63 6,215.63 1,105,000.00 12/18/21 12/20/21 GMALT 2021-1 A4 DTD 02/24/2021 0.330% 02/20/2025 36261RAD0 0.00 141.63 141.63 515,000.00 12/20/21 12/20/21 VALET 2021-1 A3 DTD 12/13/2021 1.020% 06/22/2026 92868KAC7 0.00 203.29 203.29 1,025,000.00 12/20/21 12/21/21 HAROT 2021-4 A3 DTD 11/24/2021 0.880% 01/21/2026 43815GAC3 0.00 491.70 491.70 745,000.00 12/21/21 12/21/21 HAROT 2021-1 A3 DTD 02/24/2021 0.270% 04/21/2025 43813GAC5 0.00 119.25 119.25 530,000.00 12/21/21 12/24/21 ENERBANK USA DTD 07/24/2020 0.450% 07/24/2024 29278TQD5 0.00 90.62 90.62 245,000.00 12/24/21 12/29/21 WELLS FARGO BANK NA DTD 01/29/2020 1.900% 01/30/2023 949763S64 0.00 382.60 382.60 245,000.00 12/29/21 12/29/21 CHIPPEWA VALLEY BANK DTD 07/29/2020 0.500% 07/29/2025 169894AT9 0.00 100.68 100.68 245,000.00 12/29/21 12/30/21 MEDALLION BANK UTAH DTD 07/30/2020 0.550% 07/30/2025 58404DHQ7 0.00 110.75 110.75 245,000.00 12/30/21 12/31/21 US TREASURY NOTES DTD 12/31/2020 0.375% 12/31/2025 91282CBC4 0.00 7,312.50 7,312.50 3,900,000.00 12/31/21 12/31/21 US TREASURY NOTES DTD 12/31/2015 2.125% 12/31/2022 912828N30 0.00 53,125.00 53,125.00 5,000,000.00 12/31/21 98,089.95 98,089.95 0.00 32,955,000.00 Transaction Type Sub-Total SELL 12/03/21 WAL-MART STORES INC CORP (CALLABLE) NOTE DTD 10/20/2017 2.350% 12/15/2022 931142DU4 3,055,590.00 32,900.00 3,088,490.00 141,750.00 75,420.48 FIFO 3,000,000.00 12/01/21 12/03/21 US TREASURY NOTES DTD 11/15/2012 1.625% 11/15/2022 912828TY6 3,190,974.61 2,545.23 3,193,519.84 (52,787.11)(2,992.03)FIFO 3,150,000.00 12/01/21 12/13/21 US TREASURY NOTES DTD 10/15/2019 1.375% 10/15/2022 912828YK0 1,059,228.52 2,340.14 1,061,568.66 (17,349.61)(1,658.91)FIFO 1,050,000.00 12/08/21 Account 73340000 Page 23 Page 44 For the Month Ending December 31, 2021Managed Account Security Transactions & Interest CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 73340000 Transaction Type Trade CUSIPSecurity DescriptionSettle Par Proceeds Principal Accrued Interest Total Cost Realized G/L Realized G/L Sale Amort Cost Method 37,785.37 70,769.54 71,613.28 7,343,578.50 7,305,793.13 7,200,000.00 Transaction Type Sub-Total (560,801.96) 124,463.18 (436,338.78) 71,613.28 70,769.54 Managed Account Sub-Total Total Security Transactions $71,613.28 ($436,338.78)$124,463.18 ($560,801.96)$70,769.54 Account 73340000 Page 24 Page 45 Trustee and/or Purchase Maturity Cost Bond Issue/Description Paying Agent Account Name Trust Account #Fund Investment Date Date*Yield Value CFD 2003-01 Improvement Area 1 (2013)Wells Fargo Reserve Fund 46571801 865 Money Market Fund 9/1/2013 N/A 0.01%1,417,059.27$ Agency Project 46571807 614 Money Market Fund 9/1/2013 N/A 0.01%77,815.03$ Cultural Center Fund 46571808 615 Money Market Fund 9/1/2013 N/A 0.01%191,852.23$ Bond Fund 46571800 864 Money Market Fund 9/1/2013 N/A 0.01%4.51$ Developer Project 46571806 614 Money Market Fund 9/1/2013 N/A 0.01%98,096.70$ Special Tax 46571805 864 Money Market Fund 9/1/2013 N/A 0.01%77.15$ 1,784,904.89$ CFD 2003-01 Improvement Area 2 (2013)Wells Fargo Bond Fund 46659800 866 Money Market Fund 12/1/2013 N/A 0.01%0.85$ Reserve Fund 46659801 867 Money Market Fund 12/1/2013 N/A 0.01%132,479.25$ Special Tax Fund 46659805 866 Money Market Fund 12/1/2013 N/A 0.01%7.23$ 132,487.33$ CFD No 2004-01 Rancho Etiwanda Series Wells Fargo Admin Expense Fund 48436802 Money Market Fund N/A 0.01%-$ Bond Fund 48436800 820 Money Market Fund N/A 0.01%9.88 Reserve Fund 48436801 821 Money Market Fund N/A 0.01%1,187,415.59 Special Tax Fund 48436807 820 Money Market Fund N/A 64.73 Project Fund 48436809 617 Money Market Fund N/A 44,982.82 1,232,473.02$ 2014 Rancho Summit Wells Fargo Cost of Issuance Fund 48709906 Money Market Fund N/A -$ Bond Fund 48709900 858 Money Market Fund N/A 3.25 Reserve Fund 48709901 859 Money Market Fund N/A 260,764.38 Sepcial Tax Fund 48709907 858 Money Market Fund N/A 14.19 Rebate Fund 48709908 Money Market Fund N/A - Redemption Fund 48709903 Money Market Fund N/A - Prepayment Fund 48709904 Money Market Fund N/A - 260,781.82$ 2019 Lease Revenue Bonds Wells Fargo Bond Fund 82631600 711 Money Market Fund 2/28/2019 N/A 1.16$ Interest 82631601 711 Money Market Fund 2/28/2019 N/A - Principal 82631602 711 Money Market Fund 2/28/2019 N/A 1.71 Acquisition and Construciton - Series A 82631605 711 Money Market Fund 2/28/2019 N/A 7,633,218.45 Acquisition and Construciton - Series B 82631606 711 Money Market Fund 2/28/2019 N/A 2,294,333.26 Cost of Issuance 82631607 711 Money Market Fund 2/28/2019 N/A - 9,927,554.58$ CFD No. 2000-01 South Etiwanda Union Bank Rancho Cucamonga 2015 CFD2000-1 AGY 6712140200 7/30/2015 N/A -$ Special Tax Fund 6712140201 Money Market Fund 7/30/2015 N/A 10,652.54 Bond Fund 6712140202 852 Money Market Fund 7/30/2015 N/A 0.10 Prepayment Fund 6712140203 Money Market Fund 7/30/2015 N/A - Reserve Fund 6712140204 853 Money Market Fund 7/30/2015 N/A 0.00%12,100.24 22,752.88$ City of Rancho Cucamonga Summary of Cash and Investments with Fiscal Agents For the Month Ended 12/31/2021 I:\FINANCE\SALINA\Fiscal Agent Stmts\FY 2021-22\12-2021\December 2021 Fiscal Agent Statements Workbook Summary Report Page 1 Page 46 Trustee and/or Purchase Maturity Cost Bond Issue/Description Paying Agent Account Name Trust Account #Fund Investment Date Date*Yield Value City of Rancho Cucamonga Summary of Cash and Investments with Fiscal Agents For the Month Ended 12/31/2021 CFD No. 2000-02 Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park Union Bank Rancho Cucamonga 2015 CFD2000-2 AGY 6712140300 Money Market Fund 7/30/2015 N/A -$ Special Tax Fund 6712140301 Money Market Fund 7/30/2015 N/A 91,571.11$ Bond Fund 6712140302 856 Money Market Fund 7/30/2015 N/A 0.96$ Prepayment Fund 6712140303 Money Market Fund 7/30/2015 N/A -$ Reserve Fund 6712140304 857 Money Market Fund 7/30/2015 N/A 0.00%117,352.32 208,924.39$ CFD No. 2001-01 IA 1&2, Series A Union Bank Rancho Cucamonga 2015 CFD2001-1 AGY 6712140400 Money Market Fund 7/30/2015 N/A -$ Special Tax Fund 6712140401 Money Market Fund 7/30/2015 N/A 186,192.35 Bond Fund 6712140402 860 Money Market Fund 7/30/2015 N/A 1.06 Prepayment Fund 6712140403 Money Market Fund 7/30/2015 N/A - Reserve Fund 6712140404 861 Money Market Fund 7/30/2015 N/A 0.00%117,352.65 303,546.06$ CFD No. 2001-01 IA3, Series B Union Bank Rancho Cucamonga 2015 CFD2001-1 AGY 6712140500 Money Market Fund 7/30/2015 N/A -$ Special Tax Fund 6712140501 Money Market Fund 7/30/2015 N/A 3,223.12 Bond Fund 6712140502 862 Money Market Fund 7/30/2015 N/A 0.10 Prepayment Fund 6712140503 Money Market Fund 7/30/2015 N/A - Reserve Fund 6712140504 863 Money Market Fund 7/30/2015 N/A 0.00%26,250.45 29,473.67$ CFD No. 2006-01 Vintner's Grove Union Bank Rancho Cucamonga 2015 CFD2006-1 AGY 6712140600 Money Market Fund 7/30/2015 N/A -$ Special Tax Fund 6712140601 Money Market Fund 7/30/2015 N/A 304.45 Bond Fund 6712140602 869 Money Market Fund 7/30/2015 N/A 0.41 Prepayment Fund 6712140603 Money Market Fund 7/30/2015 N/A - Reserve Fund 6712140604 870 Money Market Fund 7/30/2015 N/A 0.00%130,469.02 130,773.88$ CFD No. 2006-02 Amador on Rt. 66 Union Bank Rancho Cucamonga 2015 CFD2006-2 AGY 6712140700 Money Market Fund 7/30/2015 N/A -$ Special Tax Fund 6712140701 Money Market Fund 7/30/2015 N/A 1,190.57 Bond Fund 6712140702 871 Money Market Fund 7/30/2015 N/A 0.25 Prepayment Fund 6712140703 Money Market Fund 7/30/2015 N/A - Reserve Fund 6712140704 872 Money Market Fund 7/30/2015 N/A 0.00%78,282.94 79,473.76$ 14,113,146.28 TOTAL CASH AND INVESTMENTS WITH FISCAL AGENTS 14,113,146.28$ * Note: These investments are money market accounts which have no stated maturity date as they may be liquidated upon demand. I:\FINANCE\SALINA\Fiscal Agent Stmts\FY 2021-22\12-2021\December 2021 Fiscal Agent Statements Workbook Summary Report Page 2 Page 47 Page 48 For the Month Ending December 31, 2021 Account Statement Consolidated Summary Statement RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Investment Allocation Investment Type Closing Market Value Percent 354,107.90 0.42 Asset-Backed Security 2,540,047.37 3.01 Corporate Note 483,261.28 0.57 Certificate of Deposit - FDIC Insured 794,887.91 0.94 Commercial Paper 2,728,439.58 3.23 Supra-National Agency Bond / Note 21,043,004.33 24.90 U.S. Treasury Bond / Note 56,151,018.92 66.43 Local Agency Investment Fund 422,638.37 0.50 Passbook/Checking Accounts $84,517,405.66 Total 100.00% Portfolio Summary and Income Closing Market ValuePortfolio Holdings Cash Dividends PFM Managed Account (5,003.79) 27,943,748.37 Local Agency Investment Fund 0.00 56,151,018.92 Passbook/Checking Accounts 0.00 422,638.37 ($5,003.79)$84,517,405.66 Total Maturity Distribution (Fixed Income Holdings) Portfolio Holdings Closing Market Value Percent 57,368,545.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,359,456.91 7,288,287.26 7,175,951.07 1,772,312.54 8,552,852.68 0.00 67.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.79 8.62 8.49 2.10 10.12 0.00 Under 30 days 31 to 60 days 61 to 90 days 91 to 180 days 181 days to 1 year 1 to 2 years 2 to 3 years 3 to 4 years 4 to 5 years Over 5 years Total $84,517,405.66 329 100.00% Weighted Average Days to Maturity Sector Allocation 0.42% ABS 3.01% Corporate Note 0.57% Cert of Deposit - FDIC 0.94% Commercial Paper 3.23% Supra-National Agency Bond / Note 24.90% US TSY Bond / Note 66.43% Local Agency Investment Fund 0.50% Passbook/Checking Accounts Summary Page 1 Page 49 For the Month Ending December 31, 2021Managed Account Summary Statement CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIST - 73340100 Total Cash Basis Earnings Plus Net Realized Gains/Losses Less Purchased Interest Related to Interest/Coupons Interest/Dividends/Coupons Received Earnings Reconciliation (Cash Basis) - Managed Account Less Beginning Accrued Interest Less Beginning Amortized Value of Securities Less Cost of New Purchases Plus Coupons/Dividends Received Plus Proceeds of Maturities/Calls/Principal Payments Plus Proceeds from Sales Ending Accrued Interest Ending Amortized Value of Securities Earnings Reconciliation (Accrual Basis) $27,904,221.34 0.00 (389,484.38) 497,397.88 0.00 (68,386.47) $27,943,748.37 1,320.38 (886.67) (5,437.50) ($5,003.79) Total 28,242,002.10 47,343.56 389,492.62 0.00 1,312.14 (498,284.55) (28,153,398.67) (21,808.92) Total Accrual Basis Earnings $6,658.28 Closing Market Value Change in Current Value Unsettled Trades Principal Acquisitions Principal Dispositions Maturities/Calls Opening Market Value Transaction Summary - Managed Account _________________ _________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________Reconciling Transactions Net Cash Contribution Security Purchases Principal Payments Coupon/Interest/Dividend Income Sale Proceeds Maturities/Calls Cash Transactions Summary - Managed Account 0.00 389,492.62 1,312.14 0.00 (498,284.55) 0.00 0.00 Cash Balance $50,548.23 Closing Cash Balance Account 73340100 Page 1 Page 50 For the Month Ending December 31, 2021Portfolio Summary and Statistics CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIST - 73340100 Account Summary Percent Par Value Market ValueDescription U.S. Treasury Bond / Note 20,975,000.00 21,043,004.33 75.31 Supra-National Agency Bond / Note 2,810,000.00 2,728,439.58 9.76 Corporate Note 2,465,000.00 2,540,047.37 9.09 Commercial Paper 795,000.00 794,887.91 2.84 Certificate of Deposit - FDIC Insured 490,000.00 483,261.28 1.73 Asset-Backed Security 355,000.00 354,107.90 1.27 Managed Account Sub-Total 27,890,000.00 27,943,748.37 100.00% Accrued Interest 47,343.56 Total Portfolio 27,890,000.00 27,991,091.93 Unsettled Trades 0.00 0.00 Sector Allocation 1.27% ABS 1.73% Cert of Deposit - FDIC 2.84% Commercial Paper 9.09% Corporate Note 9.76% Supra-National Agency Bond / Note 75.31% US TSY Bond / Note 0 - 6 Months 6 - 12 Months 1 - 2 Years 2 - 3 Years 3 - 4 Years 4 - 5 Years Over 5 Years 2.85% 8.44% 26.08%25.68% 6.34% 30.61% 0.00% Maturity Distribution Characteristics Yield to Maturity at Cost Yield to Maturity at Market Weighted Average Days to Maturity 994 0.54% 0.93% Account 73340100 Page 2 Page 51 For the Month Ending December 31, 2021Managed Account Issuer Summary CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIST - 73340100 Credit Quality (S&P Ratings) 0.70% A 0.39% A+ 3.74% A- 2.84% A-1 1.33% AA 75.30% AA+ 10.78% AAA 2.94% BBB+ 1.98% NR Issuer Summary Percentof HoldingsIssuer Market Value 370,806.75 1.33 AMAZON.COM INC 283,730.15 1.02 AMERICAN EXPRESS CO 197,194.80 0.71 AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE 148,088.70 0.53 ASTRAZENECA PLC 177,747.41 0.64 BANK OF AMERICA CO 179,249.87 0.64 CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORP 181,998.60 0.65 CITIGROUP INC 242,636.24 0.87 ENERBANK USA 177,265.94 0.63 GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC 69,851.20 0.25 HONDA AUTO RECEIVABLES 160,319.85 0.57 IBM CORP 360,332.38 1.29 INTER-AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK 2,368,107.20 8.47 INTL BANK OF RECONSTRUCTION AND DEV 361,267.34 1.29 JP MORGAN CHASE & CO 794,887.91 2.84 LMA AMERICAS LLC 240,625.04 0.86 MEDALLION BANK UTAH 178,667.78 0.64 MORGAN STANLEY 194,837.20 0.70 THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORPORATION 108,122.85 0.39 TOYOTA MOTOR CORP 21,043,004.33 75.30 UNITED STATES TREASURY 105,006.83 0.38 VOLKSWAGEN OF AMERICA $27,943,748.37 Total 100.00% Account 73340100 Page 3 Page 52 For the Month Ending December 31, 2021Managed Account Detail of Securities Held CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIST - 73340100 Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTradeSettle Par U.S. Treasury Bond / Note US TREASURY NOTES DTD 11/30/2020 0.125% 11/30/2022 2,359,456.91 2,365,278.15 259.89 2,365,461.91 05/26/2105/25/21AaaAA+ 2,365,000.00 91282CAX9 0.11 US TREASURY NOTES DTD 05/31/2018 2.750% 05/31/2023 2,365,642.85 2,378,795.07 5,548.35 2,414,591.02 05/26/2105/25/21AaaAA+ 2,295,000.00 9128284S6 0.16 US TREASURY N/B NOTES DTD 07/31/2021 0.125% 07/31/2023 992,031.20 998,689.32 523.10 998,359.38 08/09/2108/06/21AaaAA+ 1,000,000.00 91282CCN9 0.21 US TREASURY N/B NOTES DTD 08/31/2021 0.125% 08/31/2023 787,919.57 793,910.99 337.66 793,695.70 09/03/2109/02/21AaaAA+ 795,000.00 91282CCU3 0.21 US TREASURY N/B NOTES DTD 10/31/2021 0.375% 10/31/2023 790,528.13 792,945.52 510.60 792,764.06 11/03/2111/01/21AaaAA+ 795,000.00 91282CDD0 0.52 US TREASURY NOTES DTD 11/30/2018 2.875% 11/30/2023 2,352,165.51 2,374,313.06 5,712.09 2,410,342.97 05/26/2105/25/21AaaAA+ 2,260,000.00 9128285P1 0.22 US TREASURY NOTES DTD 01/15/2021 0.125% 01/15/2024 987,343.80 990,078.92 577.45 989,492.19 11/18/2111/17/21AaaAA+ 1,000,000.00 91282CBE0 0.62 US TREASURY N/B NOTES DTD 05/15/2021 0.250% 05/15/2024 1,948,152.25 1,971,986.24 641.06 1,971,219.73 05/26/2105/25/21AaaAA+ 1,975,000.00 91282CCC3 0.31 US TREASURY N/B NOTES DTD 06/15/2021 0.250% 06/15/2024 335,006.25 339,141.12 39.70 338,990.63 07/28/2107/26/21AaaAA+ 340,000.00 91282CCG4 0.35 US TREASURY N/B NOTES DTD 07/15/2021 0.375% 07/15/2024 987,500.00 990,267.16 1,732.34 989,804.69 11/18/2111/17/21AaaAA+ 1,000,000.00 91282CCL3 0.76 US TREASURY NOTES DTD 11/30/2019 1.500% 11/30/2024 2,031,250.00 2,061,178.45 2,637.36 2,073,828.13 05/26/2105/25/21AaaAA+ 2,000,000.00 912828YV6 0.44 US TREASURY NOTES DTD 05/31/2020 0.250% 05/31/2025 1,531,687.50 1,558,005.51 346.15 1,555,004.88 05/26/2105/25/21AaaAA+ 1,575,000.00 912828ZT0 0.57 US TREASURY NOTES DTD 01/31/2021 0.375% 01/31/2026 483,750.00 493,438.27 784.65 492,910.16 09/03/2109/01/21AaaAA+ 500,000.00 91282CBH3 0.70 US TREASURY N/B NOTES DTD 04/30/2021 0.750% 04/30/2026 686,000.00 698,823.26 899.17 698,660.16 05/27/2105/25/21AaaAA+ 700,000.00 91282CBW0 0.79 Account 73340100 Page 4 Page 53 For the Month Ending December 31, 2021Managed Account Detail of Securities Held CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIST - 73340100 Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTradeSettle Par U.S. Treasury Bond / Note US TREASURY NOTES DTD 05/31/2019 2.125% 05/31/2026 1,038,593.80 1,061,826.28 1,868.13 1,067,851.56 07/28/2107/26/21AaaAA+ 1,000,000.00 9128286X3 0.70 US TREASURY N/B NOTES DTD 10/31/2021 1.125% 10/31/2026 372,539.06 373,355.77 722.55 373,300.78 11/03/2111/01/21AaaAA+ 375,000.00 91282CDG3 1.22 US TREASURY N/B NOTES DTD 10/31/2021 1.125% 10/31/2026 993,437.50 994,092.66 1,926.79 993,945.31 11/18/2111/17/21AaaAA+ 1,000,000.00 91282CDG3 1.25 25,067.04 21,043,004.33 21,236,125.75 0.43 21,320,223.26 20,975,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total Supra-National Agency Bond / Note INTER-AMERICAN DEVEL BK NOTES DTD 09/23/2021 0.500% 09/23/2024 360,332.38 364,754.54 496.81 364,729.90 09/23/2109/15/21AaaAAA 365,000.00 4581X0DZ8 0.52 INTL BK RECON & DEVELOP NOTES (CALLABLE) DTD 02/10/2021 0.650% 02/10/2026 2,368,107.20 2,425,786.63 6,224.56 2,422,970.55 05/26/2105/25/21AaaAAA 2,445,000.00 459058JS3 0.85 6,721.37 2,728,439.58 2,790,541.17 0.80 2,787,700.45 2,810,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total Corporate Note AMERICAN EXPRESS CO CORP NOTES (CALLABLE DTD 07/30/2019 2.500% 07/30/2024 283,730.15 284,440.84 2,883.68 284,845.00 11/23/2111/19/21A3BBB+ 275,000.00 025816CG2 1.14 MORGAN STANLEY CORPORATE NOTES DTD 01/27/2016 3.875% 01/27/2026 178,667.78 182,462.49 2,735.10 185,034.30 05/27/2105/25/21A1BBB+ 165,000.00 61746BDZ6 1.19 GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC CORP NOTES (CALL DTD 02/25/2016 3.750% 02/25/2026 177,265.94 181,095.40 2,165.63 183,570.75 05/27/2105/25/21A2BBB+ 165,000.00 38143U8H7 1.30 JP MORGAN CORP (CALLABLE) NOTES DTD 03/23/2016 3.300% 04/01/2026 361,267.34 369,207.13 2,805.00 373,585.20 05/27/2105/25/21A2A- 340,000.00 46625HQW3 1.20 BANK OF AMERICA CORP NOTES DTD 04/19/2016 3.500% 04/19/2026 177,747.41 180,709.74 1,155.00 182,902.50 05/27/2105/25/21A2A- 165,000.00 06051GFX2 1.21 Account 73340100 Page 5 Page 54 For the Month Ending December 31, 2021Managed Account Detail of Securities Held CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIST - 73340100 Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTradeSettle Par Corporate Note CITIGROUP CORP NOTES DTD 05/02/2016 3.400% 05/01/2026 181,998.60 185,031.71 963.33 187,113.90 05/27/2105/25/21A3BBB+ 170,000.00 172967KN0 1.29 AMAZON.COM INC CORPORATE NOTES DTD 05/12/2021 1.000% 05/12/2026 370,806.75 375,313.17 510.42 375,356.25 05/27/2105/25/21A1AA 375,000.00 023135BX3 0.98 IBM CORP DTD 05/15/2019 3.300% 05/15/2026 160,319.85 164,147.14 632.50 165,211.50 09/03/2109/01/21A3A- 150,000.00 459200JZ5 1.08 ASTRAZENECA FINANCE LLC (CALLABLE) CORP DTD 05/28/2021 1.200% 05/28/2026 148,088.70 150,756.94 165.00 150,814.50 09/03/2109/01/21A3A- 150,000.00 04636NAA1 1.08 TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP CORPORATE NOTES DTD 06/18/2021 1.125% 06/18/2026 108,122.85 109,771.25 44.69 109,755.80 09/13/2109/08/21A1A+ 110,000.00 89236TJK2 1.17 AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORPORATE NOTES DTD 09/09/2021 1.300% 09/09/2026 197,194.80 197,122.74 808.89 197,074.00 12/03/2112/01/21A3A- 200,000.00 02665WDZ1 1.62 BANK OF NY MELLON CORP CORPORATE NOTES DTD 07/27/2021 1.050% 10/15/2026 194,837.20 195,404.25 443.33 195,328.00 12/03/2112/01/21A1A 200,000.00 06406RAV9 1.55 15,312.57 2,540,047.37 2,575,462.80 1.22 2,590,591.70 2,465,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total Commercial Paper LMA AMERICAS LLC COMM PAPER DTD 05/25/2021 0.000% 01/25/2022 794,887.91 794,915.20 0.00 794,137.87 05/26/2105/25/21P-1A-1 795,000.00 53944RAR9 0.16 0.00 794,887.91 794,915.20 0.16 794,137.87 795,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total Certificate of Deposit - FDIC Insured ENERBANK USA DTD 07/24/2020 0.450% 07/24/2024 242,636.24 245,000.00 24.16 245,000.00 07/24/2007/24/20NRNR 245,000.00 29278TQD5 0.45 Account 73340100 Page 6 Page 55 For the Month Ending December 31, 2021Managed Account Detail of Securities Held CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIST - 73340100 Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTradeSettle Par Certificate of Deposit - FDIC Insured MEDALLION BANK UTAH DTD 07/30/2020 0.550% 07/30/2025 240,625.04 245,000.00 7.38 245,000.00 07/30/2007/30/20NRNR 245,000.00 58404DHQ7 0.55 31.54 483,261.28 490,000.00 0.50 490,000.00 490,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total Asset-Backed Security HAROT 2021-4 A3 DTD 11/24/2021 0.880% 01/21/2026 69,851.20 69,985.61 17.11 69,985.24 11/24/2111/16/21AaaNR 70,000.00 43815GAC3 0.89 VALET 2021-1 A3 DTD 12/13/2021 1.020% 06/22/2026 105,006.83 104,995.93 32.73 104,995.88 12/13/2112/07/21AaaAAA 105,000.00 92868KAC7 1.02 COMET 2021-A3 A3 DTD 11/30/2021 1.040% 11/16/2026 179,249.87 179,975.64 161.20 179,975.20 11/30/2111/18/21NRAAA 180,000.00 14041NFY2 1.04 211.04 354,107.90 354,957.18 1.01 354,956.32 355,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total 27,890,000.00 28,337,609.60 0.54 47,343.56 28,242,002.10 27,943,748.37 Managed Account Sub-Total $27,890,000.00 $28,337,609.60 $47,343.56 $28,242,002.10 $27,943,748.37 0.54% $27,991,091.93 $47,343.56 Total Investments Accrued Interest Securities Sub-Total Account 73340100 Page 7 Page 56 For the Month Ending December 31, 2021Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIST - 73340100 Value On Cost Amort CostCUSIPBrokerDatePriceDated Date/Coupon/Maturity Par at Mkt Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/LNext Call MarketSecurity Type/Description YTMEffective Duration U.S. Treasury Bond / Note (5,821.24)(6,005.00) 2,359,456.91 99.77 HSBC 2,365,000.00 91282CAX9US TREASURY NOTES DTD 11/30/2020 0.125% 11/30/2022 0.38 0.91 (13,152.22)(48,948.17) 2,365,642.85 103.08 HSBC 2,295,000.00 9128284S6US TREASURY NOTES DTD 05/31/2018 2.750% 05/31/2023 0.56 1.39 (6,658.12)(6,328.18) 992,031.20 99.20 MERRILL 1,000,000.00 91282CCN9US TREASURY N/B NOTES DTD 07/31/2021 0.125% 07/31/2023 0.63 1.58 (5,991.42)(5,776.13) 787,919.57 99.11 CITIGRP 795,000.00 91282CCU3US TREASURY N/B NOTES DTD 08/31/2021 0.125% 08/31/2023 0.66 1.66 (2,417.39)(2,235.93) 790,528.13 99.44 CITIGRP 795,000.00 91282CDD0US TREASURY N/B NOTES DTD 10/31/2021 0.375% 10/31/2023 0.68 1.83 (22,147.55)(58,177.46) 2,352,165.51 104.08 CITIGRP 2,260,000.00 9128285P1US TREASURY NOTES DTD 11/30/2018 2.875% 11/30/2023 0.73 1.87 (2,735.12)(2,148.39) 987,343.80 98.73 JPM_CHA 1,000,000.00 91282CBE0US TREASURY NOTES DTD 01/15/2021 0.125% 01/15/2024 0.75 2.04 (23,833.99)(23,067.48) 1,948,152.25 98.64 BARCLAY 1,975,000.00 91282CCC3US TREASURY N/B NOTES DTD 05/15/2021 0.250% 05/15/2024 0.83 2.37 (4,134.87)(3,984.38) 335,006.25 98.53 MERRILL 340,000.00 91282CCG4US TREASURY N/B NOTES DTD 06/15/2021 0.250% 06/15/2024 0.86 2.45 (2,767.16)(2,304.69) 987,500.00 98.75 JPM_CHA 1,000,000.00 91282CCL3US TREASURY N/B NOTES DTD 07/15/2021 0.375% 07/15/2024 0.87 2.53 (29,928.45)(42,578.13) 2,031,250.00 101.56 GOLDMAN 2,000,000.00 912828YV6US TREASURY NOTES DTD 11/30/2019 1.500% 11/30/2024 0.96 2.86 (26,318.01)(23,317.38) 1,531,687.50 97.25 WELLS_F 1,575,000.00 912828ZT0US TREASURY NOTES DTD 05/31/2020 0.250% 05/31/2025 1.07 3.40 (9,688.27)(9,160.16) 483,750.00 96.75 NOMURA 500,000.00 91282CBH3US TREASURY NOTES DTD 01/31/2021 0.375% 01/31/2026 1.19 4.05 (12,823.26)(12,660.16) 686,000.00 98.00 BNP_PAR 700,000.00 91282CBW0US TREASURY N/B NOTES DTD 04/30/2021 0.750% 04/30/2026 1.23 4.26 (23,232.48)(29,257.76) 1,038,593.80 103.86 CITIGRP 1,000,000.00 9128286X3US TREASURY NOTES DTD 05/31/2019 2.125% 05/31/2026 1.22 4.23 (816.71)(761.72) 372,539.06 99.34 MORGAN_ 375,000.00 91282CDG3US TREASURY N/B NOTES DTD 10/31/2021 1.125% 10/31/2026 1.27 4.71 (655.16)(507.81) 993,437.50 99.34 CITIGRP 1,000,000.00 91282CDG3US TREASURY N/B NOTES DTD 10/31/2021 1.125% 10/31/2026 1.27 4.71 Account 73340100 Page 8 Page 57 For the Month Ending December 31, 2021Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIST - 73340100 Value On Cost Amort CostCUSIPBrokerDatePriceDated Date/Coupon/Maturity Par at Mkt Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/LNext Call MarketSecurity Type/Description YTMEffective Duration (277,218.93) 0.81 (193,121.42) 21,043,004.33 20,975,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total 2.42 Supra-National Agency Bond / Note (4,422.16)(4,397.52) 360,332.38 98.72 JPM_CHA 365,000.00 4581X0DZ8INTER-AMERICAN DEVEL BK NOTES DTD 09/23/2021 0.500% 09/23/2024 0.98 2.71 (57,679.43)(54,863.35) 2,368,107.20 96.86 02/10/22KEYBANC 2,445,000.00 459058JS3INTL BK RECON & DEVELOP NOTES (CALLABLE) DTD 02/10/2021 0.650% 02/10/2026 1.44 0.12 (59,260.87) 1.38 (62,101.59) 2,728,439.58 2,810,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total 0.47 Corporate Note (710.69)(1,114.85) 283,730.15 103.17 06/30/24MORGAN_ 275,000.00 025816CG2AMERICAN EXPRESS CO CORP NOTES (CALLABLE DTD 07/30/2019 2.500% 07/30/2024 1.25 2.42 (3,794.71)(6,366.52) 178,667.78 108.28 BNP_PAR 165,000.00 61746BDZ6MORGAN STANLEY CORPORATE NOTES DTD 01/27/2016 3.875% 01/27/2026 1.76 3.76 (3,829.46)(6,304.81) 177,265.94 107.43 11/25/25JPM_CHA 165,000.00 38143U8H7GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC CORP NOTES (CALL DTD 02/25/2016 3.750% 02/25/2026 1.88 3.63 (7,939.79)(12,317.86) 361,267.34 106.26 01/01/26JSEB 340,000.00 46625HQW3JP MORGAN CORP (CALLABLE) NOTES DTD 03/23/2016 3.300% 04/01/2026 1.77 3.76 (2,962.33)(5,155.09) 177,747.41 107.73 FIFTH_3 165,000.00 06051GFX2BANK OF AMERICA CORP NOTES DTD 04/19/2016 3.500% 04/19/2026 1.63 4.02 (3,033.11)(5,115.30) 181,998.60 107.06 JPM_CHA 170,000.00 172967KN0CITIGROUP CORP NOTES DTD 05/02/2016 3.400% 05/01/2026 1.70 4.06 (4,506.42)(4,549.50) 370,806.75 98.88 UBS 375,000.00 023135BX3AMAZON.COM INC CORPORATE NOTES DTD 05/12/2021 1.000% 05/12/2026 1.26 4.28 (3,827.29)(4,891.65) 160,319.85 106.88 MORGAN_ 150,000.00 459200JZ5IBM CORP DTD 05/15/2019 3.300% 05/15/2026 1.66 4.10 (2,668.24)(2,725.80) 148,088.70 98.73 04/28/26MORGAN_ 150,000.00 04636NAA1ASTRAZENECA FINANCE LLC (CALLABLE) CORP DTD 05/28/2021 1.200% 05/28/2026 1.50 4.22 Account 73340100 Page 9 Page 58 For the Month Ending December 31, 2021Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIST - 73340100 Value On Cost Amort CostCUSIPBrokerDatePriceDated Date/Coupon/Maturity Par at Mkt Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/LNext Call MarketSecurity Type/Description YTMEffective Duration Corporate Note (1,648.40)(1,632.95) 108,122.85 98.29 JPM_CHA 110,000.00 89236TJK2TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP CORPORATE NOTES DTD 06/18/2021 1.125% 06/18/2026 1.52 4.37 72.06 120.80 197,194.80 98.60 RBC 200,000.00 02665WDZ1AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORPORATE NOTES DTD 09/09/2021 1.300% 09/09/2026 1.61 4.55 (567.05)(490.80) 194,837.20 97.42 DEUTSCH 200,000.00 06406RAV9BANK OF NY MELLON CORP CORPORATE NOTES DTD 07/27/2021 1.050% 10/15/2026 1.61 4.67 (50,544.33) 1.57 (35,415.43) 2,540,047.37 2,465,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total 3.92 Commercial Paper (27.29) 750.04 794,887.91 99.99 JPM_CHA 795,000.00 53944RAR9LMA AMERICAS LLC COMM PAPER DTD 05/25/2021 0.000% 01/25/2022 0.20 0.07 750.04 0.20 (27.29) 794,887.91 795,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total 0.07 Certificate of Deposit - FDIC Insured (2,363.76)(2,363.76) 242,636.24 99.04 NEW ACC 245,000.00 29278TQD5ENERBANK USA DTD 07/24/2020 0.450% 07/24/2024 0.83 2.55 (4,374.96)(4,374.96) 240,625.04 98.21 NEW ACC 245,000.00 58404DHQ7MEDALLION BANK UTAH DTD 07/30/2020 0.550% 07/30/2025 1.06 3.55 (6,738.72) 0.94 (6,738.72) 483,261.28 490,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total 3.05 Asset-Backed Security (134.41)(134.04) 69,851.20 99.79 MERRILL 70,000.00 43815GAC3HAROT 2021-4 A3 DTD 11/24/2021 0.880% 01/21/2026 0.93 2.16 10.90 10.95 105,006.83 100.01 WELLS_F 105,000.00 92868KAC7VALET 2021-1 A3 DTD 12/13/2021 1.020% 06/22/2026 1.02 2.10 (725.77)(725.33) 179,249.87 99.58 BARCLAY 180,000.00 14041NFY2COMET 2021-A3 A3 DTD 11/30/2021 1.040% 11/16/2026 1.13 2.82 (848.42) 1.06 (849.28) 354,107.90 355,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total 2.48 Account 73340100 Page 10 Page 59 For the Month Ending December 31, 2021Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIST - 73340100 Value On Cost Amort CostCUSIPBrokerDatePriceDated Date/Coupon/Maturity Par at Mkt Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/LNext Call MarketSecurity Type/Description YTMEffective Duration 27,890,000.00 27,943,748.37 (393,861.23)(298,253.73) 0.93 Managed Account Sub-Total 2.31 Total Investments $27,991,091.93 $47,343.56 $27,943,748.37 Accrued Interest Securities Sub-Total $27,890,000.00 ($393,861.23)($298,253.73) 0.93% 2.31 Account 73340100 Page 11 Page 60 For the Month Ending December 31, 2021Managed Account Security Transactions & Interest CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIST - 73340100 Transaction Type Trade CUSIPSecurity DescriptionSettle Par Proceeds Principal Accrued Interest Total Cost Realized G/L Realized G/L Sale Amort Cost Method BUY 12/03/21 AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORPORATE NOTES DTD 09/09/2021 1.300% 09/09/2026 02665WDZ1 (197,074.00)(606.67)(197,680.67) 200,000.00 12/01/21 12/03/21 BANK OF NY MELLON CORP CORPORATE NOTES DTD 07/27/2021 1.050% 10/15/2026 06406RAV9 (195,328.00)(280.00)(195,608.00) 200,000.00 12/01/21 12/13/21 VALET 2021-1 A3 DTD 12/13/2021 1.020% 06/22/2026 92868KAC7 (104,995.88) 0.00 (104,995.88) 105,000.00 12/07/21 (886.67)(498,284.55)(497,397.88) 505,000.00 Transaction Type Sub-Total INTEREST 12/15/21 US TREASURY N/B NOTES DTD 06/15/2021 0.250% 06/15/2024 91282CCG4 0.00 425.00 425.00 340,000.00 12/15/21 12/18/21 TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP CORPORATE NOTES DTD 06/18/2021 1.125% 06/18/2026 89236TJK2 0.00 618.75 618.75 110,000.00 12/18/21 12/20/21 VALET 2021-1 A3 DTD 12/13/2021 1.020% 06/22/2026 92868KAC7 0.00 20.82 20.82 105,000.00 12/20/21 12/21/21 HAROT 2021-4 A3 DTD 11/24/2021 0.880% 01/21/2026 43815GAC3 0.00 46.20 46.20 70,000.00 12/21/21 12/24/21 ENERBANK USA DTD 07/24/2020 0.450% 07/24/2024 29278TQD5 0.00 90.62 90.62 245,000.00 12/24/21 12/30/21 MEDALLION BANK UTAH DTD 07/30/2020 0.550% 07/30/2025 58404DHQ7 0.00 110.75 110.75 245,000.00 12/30/21 1,312.14 1,312.14 0.00 1,115,000.00 Transaction Type Sub-Total SELL 12/03/21 US TREASURY NOTES DTD 05/31/2020 0.250% 05/31/2025 912828ZT0 389,484.38 8.24 389,492.62 (5,437.50)(6,099.11)FIFO 400,000.00 12/01/21 8.24 (6,099.11)(5,437.50) 389,492.62 389,484.38 400,000.00 Transaction Type Sub-Total (107,913.50) 433.71 (107,479.79)(5,437.50)(6,099.11)Managed Account Sub-Total Account 73340100 Page 12 Page 61 For the Month Ending December 31, 2021Managed Account Security Transactions & Interest CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FIRE PROT DIST - 73340100 Total Security Transactions ($5,437.50)($107,479.79)$433.71 ($107,913.50)($6,099.11) Account 73340100 Page 13 Page 62 DATE:January 19, 2022 TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY:Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Romeo M. David, Associate Engineer SUBJECT:Consideration to Accept as Complete, File the Notice of Completion, and Authorize Release of Retention and Bonds for the Fiscal Year 2021/22 Local Slurry Seal Pavement Rehabilitation Project - Contract No. 2021- 120. (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council: 1. Accept the Fiscal Year 2021/22 Local Slurry Seal Pavement Rehabilitation, Contract No. 2021-120 (Project), as complete; 2. Approve the final contract amount of $127,496; 3. Authorize the release of the Faithful Performance Bond 35 days after recordation of Notice of Completion and accept a Maintenance Guarantee Bond; 4. Authorize the release of the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of $127,496, six months after the recordation of said notice if no claims have been received; 5. Authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and release of the project retention, 35 days after recordation of Notice of Completion; and 6. Authorize the City Engineer to approve the release of the Maintenance Bond one year following the filing of the Notice of Completion if the improvements remain free from defects in material and workmanship. BACKGROUND: On October 20, 2021, the City Council awarded a construction contract to Doug Martin Contracting, Co, Inc., in the amount of $127,496 plus 10% contingency in the amount of $12,750 for the construction of the Project. A vicinity map illustrating the various neighborhood streets that received slurry seal is included as Attachment 1. A copy of the October 20, 2021 City Council Staff Report is on file with the City Clerk. The scope of work consisted of weed kill, routing and crack sealing, application of slurry seal, protecting existing utilities, installation of pavement markers and striping and related items of work per plans. ANALYSIS: The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Page 63 Page 2 1 0 8 7 There were no contract change orders issued for the project. Further, a final balancing statement is not required as there were not changes in the final contract quantities placed or constructed during the contract. At the end of the one-year maintenance period, if the improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship, the City Clerk will release the Maintenance Bond upon approval by the City Engineer. FISCAL IMPACT: A total of $280,000 was budgeted in Fiscal Year 2021/22 from Gas Tax R&T7360 (Fund 174), which is identified under Capital Improvement Project Account No. and in the amount listed below. Account No.Funding Source Description Amount 11743035650/1022174-0 Gas Tax R&T7360 Fund (174) Local Street Rehab $280,000 Total Project Funding =$280,000 The final project cost is $181,162 as shown below: Expenditure Amount Final Construction Contract $127,496 Construction Inspection Services $33,958 Construction Materials Testing $17,790 Bid Noticing Advertisement $1,918 Total Project Cost =$181,162 A total of $98,838 is remaining in the budget for this project and will be returned to the Gas tax R&T7360 (Fund 174) fund balance to be used for future capital improvement projects. COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: This project meets our City Council core values by promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community for all, and by providing continuous improvement through the construction of high- quality public improvements. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 – Vicinity Map Page 64 ATTACHMENT 1 PROJECT# 800-2021-07 FY 2021/22 LOCAL SLURRY SEAL PAVEMENT REHABILITATIONS VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE Project Site Page 65 DATE:January 19, 2022 TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY:William Wittkopf, Public Works Services Director Jeff Benson, Parks and Landscape Superintendent Kenneth Fung, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT:Consideration to Accept the Parks Painting Project FY 20-21 (CO# 2021- 077) as Complete, File the Notice of Completion, and Authorize Release of Retention and Bonds. (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council: 1. Accept the Parks Painting Project FY 20-21, Contract No. 2021-077, as complete. 2. Approve the final contract amount of $75,340.00 3. Authorize the release of the Faithful Performance Bond. 4. Authorize the release of the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of $75,340.00, six months after the recordation of said notice if no claims have been received. 5. Authorize the Public Works Services Director to file a Notice of Completion and release of the retention in the amount of $3,767.00, 35 days after acceptance. BACKGROUND: The Parks Painting Project FY 20-21 scope of work consisted of the prepping, priming, and painting of various items in Victoria Groves Park (Base Bid), light poles in various paseos within Landscape Maintenance Districts 2 and 4 and various items in LMD-6. Pertinent information of the project is as follows: Publish Dates for Local Paper:April 20, 2021 and April 27, 2021 Bid Opening:May 18, 2021 Contract Award Date:June 16, 2021 Low Bidder:Pacific Contractors Group, Inc. Budgeted Amount:$138,400 Contract Amount:$75,340 Contingency:$27,465 Final Contract Amount:$75,340 Difference in Contract Amount:$0 Page 66 Page 2 1 0 8 3 ANALYSIS: The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the Public Works Services Director. FISCAL IMPACT: The FY 2020/2021 Adopted Budget included $138,400 for parkway, paseo, and median island landscape maintenance in LMDs 2, 4R and 6. The funding breakdown is shown in the following table: Account Funding Source Description Amount 1131303-5300 LMD 2 Park Facility Painting $68,740 1134303-5300 LMD 4R Park Facility Painting $64,660 1136303-5300 LMD 6 Park Facility Painting $5,000 Total $138,400 The final project cost is $75,340 as shown below: Account Funding Source Description Amount 1131303-5300 LMD 2 Park Facility Painting $40,184 1134303-5300 LMD 4R Park Facility Painting $29,200 1136303-5300 LMD 6 Park Facility Painting $5,956 Total $75,340 COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: By completing this project, this met the Council’s Core Value of continuous improvement and preservation of the family-oriented atmosphere within the City parks and paseos. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 - Notice of Completion Page 67 Attachment 1&nbsp;&nbsp;Page 68 DATE:January 19, 2022 TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY:Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Trina Valdez, Utilities Operations Supervisor SUBJECT:Consideration to Issue a Purchase Order for the Purchase of Fiber Optic Equipment from Calix, Inc. in the Amount of $100,000 and an Appropriation in the Amount of $150,000. (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council: 1. Approve and authorize a purchase order for the purchase of fiber optic network access equipment from Calix, Inc. in the amount of $100,000; and 2. Authorize an appropriation in the amount of $150,000 from the Fiber Optic Network Fund (Fund 711) for the purchase and future purchases. BACKGROUND: In May 2017, the City Council approved the City’s Fiber Optic Broadband Master Plan in which a business plan was devised to incorporate the City’s existing utility, information technology and traffic fiber conduits to provide high speed broadband service to Rancho Cucamonga residents and businesses. As the Rancho Municipal Broadband network continues to expand, having the appropriate inventory of access equipment available on-hand is necessary to deploy and deliver fiber broadband services to new customers without delay. The access equipment is installed on the premise of the residence or business location and is needed for the final point of demarcation connection. In order to provide high quality service and a consistent and sustainable operational environment, in 2018, RCMU standardized on Calix, Inc.’s network access equipment. This equipment interfaces between the RCMU fiber network and the customer’s home or business network. ANALYSIS: The purchase of the equipment is needed to ensure that the new residential community being developed called Homecoming at the Resort, located at the westside of the Resort Parkway between Sixth Street and Fourth Street, has the necessary equipment available and is utilizing the standardized fiber optic equipment that is currently being used for the Rancho Municipal Broadband network. Staff obtained a pricing from Calix for the network access equipment and determined it to be deemed as reasonable. Page 69 Page 2 1 0 8 1 In addition to the residential project and based on the City’s current fiber optic access equipment inventory, staff has determined that additional equipment will be needed to complete upcoming projects and new installations in the coming months. As the designs are still being completed and specific equipment has not been established, the current lead times on the procurement of the equipment is extensive and could be detrimental for the project should the City not be able to successfully deliver the fiber broadband services when requested. Staff is requesting the additional appropriation of $50,000 in preparation of the upcoming purchases to guarantee funds are available. FISCAL IMPACT: An appropriation in the amount of $150,000 from the Fiber Optic Network Fund (Fund 711) to Account No. 1711303-5200 (O&M/Field Supplies & Equipment) is required to fully fund the purchases. COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: This item addresses the City Council’s vision for the City by ensuring the construction and maintenance of high-quality public improvements that promote a world class community. This is accomplished by ensuring the City has the proper new fiber optic equipment available to install. ATTACHMENTS: None. Page 70 DATE:January 19, 2022 TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY:Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services SUBJECT:Consideration of Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement with Kosmont & Associates, Inc., for Services Related to the Formation of an Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District (EIFD). (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council approve Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement with Kosmont & Associates, Inc. BACKGROUND: Prior to the 2012 elimination of redevelopment agencies in California, Rancho Cucamonga and many other cities used tax increment financing to invest in infrastructure to support the development of their communities. With the dissolution of redevelopment agencies, that important tool was lost in our state. In 2014, SB 628 created a new tool called the Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District (EIFD). In a manner similar to how redevelopment worked, EIFD’s provide for the use of tax increment financing for certain types of infrastructure and other public investments. The original legislation has since been amended a number of times to further clarify how EIFD’s work and provide for additional uses of EIFD revenues. The attached white paper from Kosmont Companies provides for a brief overview of how EIFD’s function (Attachment 1). Importantly, it must be noted that EIFD’s do NOT result in new taxes or tax increases for property owners. In essence, the EIFD obligates the City and other participating taxing entities to redirect a portion of existing property taxes toward the new financing authority for the purposes of financing the desired infrastructure. This tool is known as tax increment financing. In that way, it functions much like the way in which redevelopment financed its activities. ANALYSIS: In 2021, the City retained Kosmont Companies to assist with an evaluation regarding how an EIFD might be used to make targeted major infrastructure investments in support of the new General Plan and to capitalize on the coming investments at Cucamonga Station. On November 3, 2021, the City Council held a study session to discuss this possible EIFD. At the session, the Council received an overview of Phase 1 of Kosmont’s work, which was a feasibility analysis regarding the EIFD. At the end of the session, the Council’s concensus was to move forward with the formation process, with the City and the Fire District as the participating taxing entities that will contribute a portion of their property tax increment. If the County of San Bernardino choses to participate at a later date, the EIFD can be amended to reflect that action. Page 71 Page 2 1 0 9 2 The proposed amendment to the existing Professional Services Agreement will provide for Kosmont’s assistance to the Finance Department through the formation process, which will begin in January 2022 and be completed in late summer 2022. These tasks will include preparation of formation documents, formation of a Public Financing Authority (PFA), drafting an Infrastructure Financing Plan (IFP), communicating with property owners and other public agencies, and holding public hearings. The following is an outline of the key formation milestones that the City Council and the community can expect over the coming months: February/March – Adoption of Resolutions of Intent to form the EIFD and establish the Public Financing Authority; preparation of the Infrastructure Financing Plan (IFP) March – Distribution of the draft IFP to property owners, City Council, and Planning Commission; PFA holds an initial public meeting to present the draft IFP April – PFA holds its first public hearing to receive comments on the IFP May – PFA holds second public hearing to receive comments, and take action on the IFP May/June – City Council and Fire Board consider resolutions approving the IFP June – PFA holds third public hearing to consider oral and written protests, and take action to terminate proceedings or adopt IFP It is recommended that the City Council approve Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement. This amendment is on file in the City Clerk’s Office. As this process moves forward, City staff will work to provide further information to the community and the various stakeholders regarding the EIFD, how it functions, and the proposed public infrastructure projects to be financed. FISCAL IMPACT: The estimated cost for Amendment No 1 is $59,500. The actual cost for the Phase 1 analysis was $28,730, bringing the total cost of the amended agreement to $88,230. Funds are available for this project in the FY 2021-22 budget. COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: The establishment of an EIFD is in keeping with the Council’s core values of intentionally embracing and anticipating the future, and providing and nurturing a high quality of life for all. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 – EIFD White Paper Page 72 Kosmont Companies Mailing Address: 1601 N. Sepulveda Blvd., #382 (424) 297-1070 Physical Address: 1230 Rosecrans Ave., #630 Manhattan Beach, CA 90266 www.kosmont.com Manhattan Beach, CA 90266 Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District (“EIFD”) Overview Enhanced Infrastructure Financing Districts (“EIFD”) are an economic development and public finance tool introduced by Senate Bill 628 in 2014. EIFDs are the predominant form of Tax Increment Financing (“TIF”) in California following the dissolution of Redevelopment Agencies in 2012. EIFD and TIF are a form of value-capture, where a lead agency (must be a city or a county) designates a boundary around parcels positioned for new development or rehabilitation. The assessed property value within the district is “frozen” at the time of formation as the “baseline” of assessed value for the district. Over time, as new development or rehabilitation occurs and new property value is added to properties within the district, participating taxing entities can dedicate all or a portion of the new incremental property tax from values above the baseline (“property tax increment”) to the EIFD with a dedicated purpose of funding infrastructure (and optionally affordable housing). Current law includes a lengthy definition of infrastructure eligible to be funded by EIFDs, including roadway, utility, open space, and transit improvements, remediation activities, government facilities, parking, broadband infrastructure, affordable housing, and numerous other categories, preceded by the phrase “including, but not limited to”, demonstrating the legislative intent for the tool to be flexible. EIFDs can also fund improvements outside of the district boundary, so long as the improvements benefit the properties within the district boundary. EIFDs can also fund maintenance costs, so long as the assets being maintained were initially installed at least partially utilizing EIFD funding. EIFDs do not create a new tax, nor do they encumber any existing agency revenues or resources. EIFDs allow taxing entities like cities, counties, and special district to set aside, similar to a retirement account, a portion of future property tax revenues for special purposes, such as infrastructure. When EIFDs are delineated and utilized appropriately, the argument is that the new assessed property value growth from new development and rehabilitation would not have otherwise occurred but for the creation of the EIFD and the dedication of revenues to solve for critical infrastructure needs. This argument has historically been well-received by private sector development and investment entities as well as third- party grant sources, which rely on the property tax increment dedication as complementary and local match funding, respectively. EIFD property tax increment may be used on a pay-as-you-go basis or leveraged in the form of EIFD bond issuances. There is no public vote required to form an EIFD or to issue EIFD debt; however, the formation process includes a series of public meetings and hearings that allows the community to comment on the proposed Infrastructure Financing Plan (“IFP”) that would govern EIFD activities. The final public hearing includes an opportunity for landowners and residents within the district boundary to protest formation of the district. If more than 50% of the combined number of landowners and residents within the EIFD protest formation, the process must halt for at least one year. If no protest occurs, the EIFD is authorized for both formation and future debt issuance. The EIFD is governed by an entity called the Public Financing Authority (“PFA”). The composition of the PFA varies, depending on which taxing entities are committing property tax increment to the EIFD. In a scenario where the lead agency (such as the City of Rancho Cucamonga) is the only entity contributing property tax increment, the PFA is comprised of five members, including three members of the city council and two members of the public appointed by the city council. If two or more taxing entities are contributing property tax increment, such as the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the County of San ATTACHMENT 1 Page 73 City of Rancho Cucamonga EIFD Overview October 26, 2021 Kosmont Companies 2 | Page (424) 297-1070 www.kosmont.com Bernardino, the PFA is comprised of at least five members (could be more), where the majority (e.g., three out of five) are either members of the city council or members of the county board of supervisors, and at least two public members appointed by elected officials of the participating taxing entities. For the EIFDs established so far in California where a city and a county are both contributing property tax increment, the “template” for PFA composition has been two members of the city council, one member of the county board of supervisors, one member of the public appointed by the city council, and one member of the public appointed by the county board of supervisors, for a total of five members. There are approximately ten EIFDs established in California as of the time of this report, and there are more than ten additional EIFDs currently in the formation process. Page 74 DATE:January 19, 2022 TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY:Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Annette Cano-Soza, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT:Consideration of the Improvement Agreement and Improvement Securities for Street Improvements, Order Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 9, Street Light Maintenance Districts Nos. 1 and 8 for Case No. DRC2014-01130, Located at the Northwest Corner of Foothill Blvd. and East Avenue. (RESOLUTION NO. 2022-017) (RESOLUTION NO. 2022-018), (RESOLUTION NO. 2022-019) (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council: 1. Approve an Improvement Agreement for related public improvements and authorize the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement; 2. Approve the plans and specifications for the related public improvements on file with the City Engineer; 3. Accept security in the form of bonds for completion of the related public improvements; and 4. Adopt the attached resolutions ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 and Street Lighting Maintenance Districts Nos. 1 and 8. BACKGROUND: On May 11, 2016, the Planning Commission approved Case No. DRC2014-01130 for the development of a 193-unit, multi-family residential development with 3,246 square feet of commercial/live work space on 8.8 acres of land within the Community Commercial (CC) Zoning District, located at the northwest corner of Foothill Blvd. and East Avenue. Case No. DRC2014-01130 was approved subject to a condition that certain public improvements be constructed including; curb and gutter, sidewalk, a driveway approach, traffic signal modification, street improvements and storm drain improvements. ANALYSIS: The developer, Foothill and East, LLC has submitted an Improvement Agreement and securities to guarantee construction of the off-site public improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond # 0811844 $709,600 Labor and Material Bond # 0811844 $709,600 Page 75 Page 2 1 0 7 9 Approval of this item by Council would approve the Improvement Agreement, accept the securities for the construction of certain public improvements, and order the annexation into Landscape Maintenance District 9 and Street Light Maintenance Districts 1 and 8. Copies of the agreement and the Consent and Waiver to Annexation forms are on file in the City Clerk’s Office. FISCAL IMPACT: The proposed annexations would satisfy the conditions of approval for the development and supply additional annual revenue into the landscape and lighting maintenance districts in the following amounts: Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 $60,200.56 Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 $3,429.61 Street Light Maintenance District No. 8 $5,905.80 The developer will be installing 10 new street trees and 4 new street lights that will be maintained by the City. COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: This item addresses the City Council’s vision for the City by ensuring the construction of high- quality improvements that promote a world class community. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 - Vicinity Map Attachment 2 - Resolution Ordering Annexation LMD 9 Attachment 3 - Resolution Ordering Annexation SLD 1 Attachment 4 - Resolution Ordering Annexation SLD 8 Page 76 ATTACHMENT 1 1 6 0 7 DRC2014-01130 Vicinity Map NOT TO SCALE Project Site Page 77 Resolution No. 20XX-XXX – Page 1 of 7 ATTACHMENT #2 RESOLUTION NO. 20XX - XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 9 (LOWER ETIWANDA) FOR CASE NO. DRC2014-01130 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the “Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972”, being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the “Act”, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 (Lower Etiwanda) (the “District”); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the Act authorize the annexation of additional territory to the District; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation of resolutions, and assessment engineer’s report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the Act related to the annexation of territory to the District, Article XIII D of the Constitution of the State of California (“Article XIII D”) establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the District on the territory proposed to be annexed to such District; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, have requested that such property (collectively, the “Territory”) be annexed to the District in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the “Improvements”); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled “Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property” (the “Consent and Waiver”); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the Act to the annexation of the Territory to the District and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the District; and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the Act and/or Article XIII D applicable to the authorization to levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and Page 78 Resolution No. 2021-XXXX- Page 2 of 7 have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization to levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly agreed for themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns that: (1) The proportionate special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the District Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance and operation expenses of the Improvements; (2) The proposed annual assessment does not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit from the Improvements conferred on each parcel in the Territory. (3) Only the special benefits derived or to be derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements have been included in the proposed annual assessment. WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the District and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvement. c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation the Territory to the District, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C. SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the District, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this day of 2021. Page 79 Resolution No. 2021-XXXX- Page 3 of 7 Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property to be Annexed The Owner of the Property is: FOOTHILL & EAST, LLC The legal description of the Property is: PARCEL 1: ALL THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 6 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF, LYING SOUTH OF LOT 9, BLOCK “Y" OF THE ETIWANDA COLONY LANDS, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 2, PAGE 24 OF MAPS, RECORDS OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, BEING ALSO DESCRIBED AS A TRACT OF LAND INCLUDED IN BLOCK "Y" BOUNDED ON THE EAST BY THE PROLONGATION SOUTH OF THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 9 AND ON THE WEST BY THE PROLONGATION SOUTH OF THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 9 AND EXTENDING FROM SAID LOT 9 ON THE NORTH TO THE SOUTH BOUNDARY OF SAID BLOCK ON SOUTH, WHICH IS ALSO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID 1/4 SECTION. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE PARCEL OF LAND AS FOLLOWS: ALL OF THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 6 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE CENTERLINE INTERSECTION OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND EAST AVENUE AS SHOWN ON RECORD OF SURVEY MAP, IN BOOK 2, PAGE 62 RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE NORTH 0° 11' 13" EAST ALONG SAID CENTERLINE OF EAST AVENUE, A DISTANCE OF 50.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89° 24' 00" WEST ALONG THE NORTH RIGHT-AT-WAY LINE OF SAID FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, A DISTANCE OF 194.02 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 80° 24' 00" WEST ALONG SAID NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, A DISTANCE OF 81.01 FEET; THENCE NORTH 0° 11’13" EAST PARALLEL TO SAID CENTERLINE OF EAST AVENUE A DISTANCE OF 330.04 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89° 24' 00" EAST PARALLEL TO SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, A DISTANCE OF 111.01 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 0° 11' 13" WEST PARALLEL TO SAID CENTER-LINE OF EAST AVENUE, A DISTANCE OF 170.02 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89° 24' 00" WEST PARALLEL TO SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, A DISTANCE OF 30.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 0° 11' 13" WEST PARALLEL TO SAID CENTERLINE OF EAST AVENUE A DISTANCE OF 160.02 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION OF SAID LYING WITHIN THE SOUTHWEST ONEQUARTER OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP. 1 SOUTH, RANGE 6 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS CONVEYED TO THE CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT BY DEED RECORDED JULY 7, 2005 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2005-0486295 OFFICIAL RECORDS, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: Page 80 Resolution No. 2021-XXXX- Page 4 of 7 BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 9 IN BLOCK "Y" OF THE ETIWANDA COLONY LANDS, PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 2 PAGE 24 OF MAPS, RECORDS OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, WITH THE SOUTHEAST LINE OF AN EASEMENT TO THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY AND THE SOUTHERN COUNTIES GAS COMPANY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, RECORDED MARCH 16, 1960 IN BOOK 5084, PAGE 134 OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE OF LOT 9, A DISTANCE OF 150 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTHERLY PROLONGATION OF THE WEST LINE OF LOT 9, A DISTANCE OF 75 FEET; THENCE WESTERLY PARALLEL WITH SAID SOUTH LINE OF LOT 9 TO SAID SOUTHEAST LINE OF SAID EASEMENT; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL 2: THAT PORTION OF LAND LYING WITHIN THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 6 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE CENTERLINE INTERSECTION OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND EAST AVENUE AS SHOWN ON RECORD OF SURVEY MAP, IN BOOK 2, PAGE 62 RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE NORTH 0° IT 13" EAST ALONG SAID CENTERLINE OF EAST AVENUE, A DISTANCE OF 50.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89° 24* 00" WEST ALONG THE NORTH RIGHT-AT-WAY LINE OF SAID FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, A DISTANCE OF 194.02 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 80° 24' 00" WEST ALONG SAID NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, A DISTANCE OF 81.01 FEET; THENCE NORTH 0° 11' 13" EAST PARALLEL TO SAID CENTERLINE OF EAST AVENUE A DISTANCE OF 330.04 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89° 24' 00" EAST PARALLEL TO SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, A DISTANCE OF 111.01 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 0° 11' 13" WEST PARALLEL TO SAID CENTER- LINE OF EAST AVENUE, A DISTANCE OF 170.02 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89° 24' 00" WEST PARALLEL TO SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, A DISTANCE OF 30.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 0° IT 13" WEST PARALLEL TO SAID CENTERLINE OF EAST AVENUE A DISTANCE OF 160.02 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL 3: ALL THAT PORTION OF THE EAST 1/2 OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 6 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT TOWNSHIP PLAT THEREOF, LYING WEST OF THE WEST LINE OF EAST AVENUE, AS SHOWN ON LICENSED LAND SURVEYORS MAP, IN BOOK 2, PAGE 62 RECORD OF SURVEYS, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, AND LYING SOUTH OF THE EASTERLY EXTENSION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 9, BLOCK "Y", ETIWANDA COLONY LANDS, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 2, PAGE 24 OF MAPS, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY. EXCEPT THEREFROM AN UNDIVIDED 1/2 INTEREST OF ALL OIL, GAS AND MINERALS AND AN UNDIVIDED 1/2 INTEREST OF ALL OIL, GAS AND MINERAL RIGHTS UPON AND UNDER THE LAND HEREIN DESCRIBED, AND THE RIGHT TO ENTER THEREON AND TO USE IN A PROPER MANNER SO MUCH OF THE SURFACE AS MAY BE REASONABLE FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXTRACTING THE OIL, GAS AND MINERAL THEREON AND THEREUNDER, AS RESERVED IN THE DEED FROM SECURITY-FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LOS ANGELES, TO WALTER T. CASEY, A MARRIED MAN, RECORDED AUGUST 21, 1937 IN BOOK 1219, PAGE 483 OFFICIAL RECORDS. THE RIGHT OF ENTRY WAS QUITCLAIMED BY THE SECURITY-FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LOS ANGELES, TO Page 81 Resolution No. 2021-XXXX- Page 5 of 7 THE OWNER OR OWNERS OF RECORD, BY DEED DATED SEPTEMBER 24, 1952 AND RECORDED OCTOBER 10,1952 IN BOOK 3035, PAGE 303 OFFICIAL RECORDS. NOTE: SAID LAND IS ALSO SHOWN ON LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR'S MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 2, PAGE 62 RECORD OF SURVEYS. Assessor’s Parcels Numbers of the Property: 1100-201-07-0-000 1100-201-03-0-000 1100-201-04-0-000 Page 82 Resolution No. 2021-XXXX- Page 6 of 7 Exhibit B Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2021/22 Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 (Lower Etiwanda): Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 (Lower Etiwanda) (the “Maintenance District”) represents landscape sites throughout the Lower Etiwanda Area. The various sites maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands and street trees. Proposed additions to the Improvements for Project Case No. DRC2014-01130: 10 new street trees Page 83 Resolution No. 2021-XXXX- Page 7 of 7 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2021/22 Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 (Lower Etiwanda): The rate per Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU) is $311.92 for the fiscal year 2021/22. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 (Lower Etiwanda) for Case No. DRC2014-01130: Land Use Basis EBU Factor* Rate per EBU* Single Family Residential Parcel 1.00 $311.92 Multi-Family Residential Unit 1.00 311.92 Non-Residential Acre 2.00 311.92 The proposed annual assessment for the property described in Exhibit A is as follows: 193 Units x 1.00 EBU Factor x $311.92 Rate per EBU = $60,200.56 Annual Assessment *Commencing with fiscal year 2001/02, the amount of the assessment for the District is proposed to increase each year, based upon the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (CPI-U), for the Riverside – San Bernardino – Ontario Consumer Price Index area, as determined by the United State Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, or its successor. The Engineer shall compute the percentage difference between the CPI for March of each year and the CPI for the previous March, and shall then adjust the assessment by an amount not to exceed such percentage for the following year. Page 84 Resolution No. 20XXX-XXXX - Page 1 of 7 ATTACHMENT 3 RESOLUTION NO. 20XX - XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS) FOR CASE NO. DRC2014-01130 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the “Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972”, being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the “Act”, said special maintenance district known and designated as Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets) (the “District”); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the Act authorize the annexation of additional territory to the District; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation of resolutions, and assessment engineer’s report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the Act related to the annexation of territory to the District, Article XIII D of the Constitution of the State of California (“Article XIII D”) establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the District on the territory proposed to be annexed to such District; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, have requested that such property (collectively, the “Territory”) be annexed to the District in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the “Improvements”); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled “Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property” (the “Consent and Waiver”); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the Act to the annexation of the Territory to the District and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the District; and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the Act and/or Article XIII D applicable to the authorization to levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization to levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and Page 85 Resolution No. 20XX-XXX – Page 2 of 7 1 9 8 3 WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly agreed for themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns that: (1) The proportionate special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the District Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance and operation expenses of the Improvements; (2) The proposed annual assessment does not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit from the Improvements conferred on each parcel in the Territory. (3) Only the special benefits derived or to be derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements have been included in the proposed annual assessment. WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the District and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvement. c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation the Territory to the District, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C. SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the District, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this day of 2021. Page 86 Resolution No. 20XX-XXX – Page 3 of 7 1 9 8 3 Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property to be Annexed The Owner of the Property is: FOOTHILL & EAST, LLC The legal description of the Property is: PARCEL 1: ALL THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 6 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF, LYING SOUTH OF LOT 9, BLOCK “Y" OF THE ETIWANDA COLONY LANDS, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 2, PAGE 24 OF MAPS, RECORDS OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, BEING ALSO DESCRIBED AS A TRACT OF LAND INCLUDED IN BLOCK "Y" BOUNDED ON THE EAST BY THE PROLONGATION SOUTH OF THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 9 AND ON THE WEST BY THE PROLONGATION SOUTH OF THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 9 AND EXTENDING FROM SAID LOT 9 ON THE NORTH TO THE SOUTH BOUNDARY OF SAID BLOCK ON SOUTH, WHICH IS ALSO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID 1/4 SECTION. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE PARCEL OF LAND AS FOLLOWS: ALL OF THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 6 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE CENTERLINE INTERSECTION OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND EAST AVENUE AS SHOWN ON RECORD OF SURVEY MAP, IN BOOK 2, PAGE 62 RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE NORTH 0° 11' 13" EAST ALONG SAID CENTERLINE OF EAST AVENUE, A DISTANCE OF 50.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89° 24' 00" WEST ALONG THE NORTH RIGHT-AT-WAY LINE OF SAID FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, A DISTANCE OF 194.02 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 80° 24' 00" WEST ALONG SAID NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, A DISTANCE OF 81.01 FEET; THENCE NORTH 0° 11’13" EAST PARALLEL TO SAID CENTERLINE OF EAST AVENUE A DISTANCE OF 330.04 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89° 24' 00" EAST PARALLEL TO SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, A DISTANCE OF 111.01 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 0° 11' 13" WEST PARALLEL TO SAID CENTER-LINE OF EAST AVENUE, A DISTANCE OF 170.02 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89° 24' 00" WEST PARALLEL TO SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, A DISTANCE OF 30.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 0° 11' 13" WEST PARALLEL TO SAID CENTERLINE OF EAST AVENUE A DISTANCE OF 160.02 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION OF SAID LYING WITHIN THE SOUTHWEST ONEQUARTER OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP. 1 SOUTH, RANGE 6 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS CONVEYED TO THE CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT BY DEED RECORDED JULY 7, 2005 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2005-0486295 OFFICIAL RECORDS, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 9 IN BLOCK "Y" OF THE ETIWANDA COLONY LANDS, PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 2 PAGE 24 OF MAPS, RECORDS OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, WITH Page 87 Resolution No. 20XX-XXX – Page 4 of 7 1 9 8 3 THE SOUTHEAST LINE OF AN EASEMENT TO THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY AND THE SOUTHERN COUNTIES GAS COMPANY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, RECORDED MARCH 16, 1960 IN BOOK 5084, PAGE 134 OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE OF LOT 9, A DISTANCE OF 150 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTHERLY PROLONGATION OF THE WEST LINE OF LOT 9, A DISTANCE OF 75 FEET; THENCE WESTERLY PARALLEL WITH SAID SOUTH LINE OF LOT 9 TO SAID SOUTHEAST LINE OF SAID EASEMENT; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL 2: THAT PORTION OF LAND LYING WITHIN THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 6 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE CENTERLINE INTERSECTION OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND EAST AVENUE AS SHOWN ON RECORD OF SURVEY MAP, IN BOOK 2, PAGE 62 RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE NORTH 0° IT 13" EAST ALONG SAID CENTERLINE OF EAST AVENUE, A DISTANCE OF 50.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89° 24* 00" WEST ALONG THE NORTH RIGHT-AT-WAY LINE OF SAID FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, A DISTANCE OF 194.02 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 80° 24' 00" WEST ALONG SAID NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, A DISTANCE OF 81.01 FEET; THENCE NORTH 0° 11' 13" EAST PARALLEL TO SAID CENTERLINE OF EAST AVENUE A DISTANCE OF 330.04 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89° 24' 00" EAST PARALLEL TO SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, A DISTANCE OF 111.01 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 0° 11' 13" WEST PARALLEL TO SAID CENTER- LINE OF EAST AVENUE, A DISTANCE OF 170.02 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89° 24' 00" WEST PARALLEL TO SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, A DISTANCE OF 30.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 0° IT 13" WEST PARALLEL TO SAID CENTERLINE OF EAST AVENUE A DISTANCE OF 160.02 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL 3: ALL THAT PORTION OF THE EAST 1/2 OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 6 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT TOWNSHIP PLAT THEREOF, LYING WEST OF THE WEST LINE OF EAST AVENUE, AS SHOWN ON LICENSED LAND SURVEYORS MAP, IN BOOK 2, PAGE 62 RECORD OF SURVEYS, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, AND LYING SOUTH OF THE EASTERLY EXTENSION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 9, BLOCK "Y", ETIWANDA COLONY LANDS, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 2, PAGE 24 OF MAPS, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY. EXCEPT THEREFROM AN UNDIVIDED 1/2 INTEREST OF ALL OIL, GAS AND MINERALS AND AN UNDIVIDED 1/2 INTEREST OF ALL OIL, GAS AND MINERAL RIGHTS UPON AND UNDER THE LAND HEREIN DESCRIBED, AND THE RIGHT TO ENTER THEREON AND TO USE IN A PROPER MANNER SO MUCH OF THE SURFACE AS MAY BE REASONABLE FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXTRACTING THE OIL, GAS AND MINERAL THEREON AND THEREUNDER, AS RESERVED IN THE DEED FROM SECURITY-FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LOS ANGELES, TO WALTER T. CASEY, A MARRIED MAN, RECORDED AUGUST 21, 1937 IN BOOK 1219, PAGE 483 OFFICIAL RECORDS. THE RIGHT OF ENTRY WAS QUITCLAIMED BY THE SECURITY-FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LOS ANGELES, TO THE OWNER OR OWNERS OF RECORD, BY DEED DATED SEPTEMBER 24, 1952 AND RECORDED OCTOBER 10,1952 IN BOOK 3035, PAGE 303 OFFICIAL RECORDS. Page 88 Resolution No. 20XX-XXX – Page 5 of 7 1 9 8 3 NOTE: SAID LAND IS ALSO SHOWN ON LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR'S MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 2, PAGE 62 RECORD OF SURVEYS. Assessor’s Parcels Numbers of the Property: 1100-201-07-0-000 1100-201-03-0-000 1100-201-04-0-000 Page 89 Resolution No. 20XX-XXX – Page 6 of 7 1 9 8 3 Exhibit B Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2019/20 Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets): Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets) (the “Maintenance District”) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. These sites consist of several non-contiguous areas throughout the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City. Proposed additions to the Improvements for Project Case No. DRC2014-01130: 4 LED street lights Page 90 Resolution No. 20XX-XXX – Page 7 of 7 1 9 8 3 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2021/22 Street Light Maintenance District No.1 (Arterial Streets): The rate per Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) is $17.77 for the fiscal year 2021/22. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No.1 (Arterial Streets) for Case No. DRC2014-01130: Land Use Basis EBU Factor* Rate per EBU* Single Family Residential Parcel 1.00 $17.77 Multi-Family Residential Parcel 1.00 17.77 Non-Residential Acre 2.00 17.77 The proposed annual assessment for the property described in Exhibit A is as follows: 193 Units x 1.00 EBU Factor x $17.77 Rate per EBU = $3,429.61 Annual Assessment Page 91 Resolution No. 20XX-XXX – Page 1 of 7 ATTACHMENT 4 RESOLUTION NO. 20XX - XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 8 (SOUTH ETIWANDA) FOR CASE NO. DRC2014-01130 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the “Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972”, being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the “Act”, said special maintenance district known and designated as Street Light Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda) (the “District”); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the Act authorize the annexation of additional territory to the District; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation of resolutions, and assessment engineer’s report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the Act related to the annexation of territory to the District, Article XIII D of the Constitution of the State of California (“Article XIII D”) establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the District on the territory proposed to be annexed to such District; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, have requested that such property (collectively, the “Territory”) be annexed to the District in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the “Improvements”); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled “Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property” (the “Consent and Waiver”); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the Act to the annexation of the Territory to the District and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the District; and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the Act and/or Article XIII D applicable to the authorization to levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization to levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and Page 92 Resolution No. 20XX-XXX – Page 2 of 7 1 9 8 1 WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly agreed for themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns that: (1) The proportionate special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the District Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance and operation expenses of the Improvements; (2) The proposed annual assessment does not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit from the Improvements conferred on each parcel in the Territory. (3) Only the special benefits derived or to be derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements have been included in the proposed annual assessment. WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the District and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvement. c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation the Territory to the District, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C. SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the District, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this day of 2021. Page 93 Resolution No. 20XX-XXX – Page 3 of 7 1 9 8 1 Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property to be Annexed The Owner of the Property is: FOOTHILL & EAST, LLC The legal description of the Property is: PARCEL 1: ALL THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 6 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF, LYING SOUTH OF LOT 9, BLOCK “Y" OF THE ETIWANDA COLONY LANDS, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 2, PAGE 24 OF MAPS, RECORDS OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, BEING ALSO DESCRIBED AS A TRACT OF LAND INCLUDED IN BLOCK "Y" BOUNDED ON THE EAST BY THE PROLONGATION SOUTH OF THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 9 AND ON THE WEST BY THE PROLONGATION SOUTH OF THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 9 AND EXTENDING FROM SAID LOT 9 ON THE NORTH TO THE SOUTH BOUNDARY OF SAID BLOCK ON SOUTH, WHICH IS ALSO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID 1/4 SECTION. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE PARCEL OF LAND AS FOLLOWS: ALL OF THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 6 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE CENTERLINE INTERSECTION OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND EAST AVENUE AS SHOWN ON RECORD OF SURVEY MAP, IN BOOK 2, PAGE 62 RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE NORTH 0° 11' 13" EAST ALONG SAID CENTERLINE OF EAST AVENUE, A DISTANCE OF 50.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89° 24' 00" WEST ALONG THE NORTH RIGHT-AT-WAY LINE OF SAID FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, A DISTANCE OF 194.02 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 80° 24' 00" WEST ALONG SAID NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, A DISTANCE OF 81.01 FEET; THENCE NORTH 0° 11’13" EAST PARALLEL TO SAID CENTERLINE OF EAST AVENUE A DISTANCE OF 330.04 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89° 24' 00" EAST PARALLEL TO SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, A DISTANCE OF 111.01 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 0° 11' 13" WEST PARALLEL TO SAID CENTER-LINE OF EAST AVENUE, A DISTANCE OF 170.02 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89° 24' 00" WEST PARALLEL TO SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, A DISTANCE OF 30.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 0° 11' 13" WEST PARALLEL TO SAID CENTERLINE OF EAST AVENUE A DISTANCE OF 160.02 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION OF SAID LYING WITHIN THE SOUTHWEST ONEQUARTER OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP. 1 SOUTH, RANGE 6 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS CONVEYED TO THE CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT BY DEED RECORDED JULY 7, 2005 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2005-0486295 OFFICIAL RECORDS, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 9 IN BLOCK "Y" OF THE ETIWANDA COLONY LANDS, PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 2 PAGE 24 OF MAPS, RECORDS OF Page 94 Resolution No. 20XX-XXX – Page 4 of 7 1 9 8 1 THE COUNTY RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, WITH THE SOUTHEAST LINE OF AN EASEMENT TO THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY AND THE SOUTHERN COUNTIES GAS COMPANY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, RECORDED MARCH 16, 1960 IN BOOK 5084, PAGE 134 OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE OF LOT 9, A DISTANCE OF 150 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTHERLY PROLONGATION OF THE WEST LINE OF LOT 9, A DISTANCE OF 75 FEET; THENCE WESTERLY PARALLEL WITH SAID SOUTH LINE OF LOT 9 TO SAID SOUTHEAST LINE OF SAID EASEMENT; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL 2: THAT PORTION OF LAND LYING WITHIN THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 6 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE CENTERLINE INTERSECTION OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND EAST AVENUE AS SHOWN ON RECORD OF SURVEY MAP, IN BOOK 2, PAGE 62 RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE NORTH 0° IT 13" EAST ALONG SAID CENTERLINE OF EAST AVENUE, A DISTANCE OF 50.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89° 24* 00" WEST ALONG THE NORTH RIGHT-AT-WAY LINE OF SAID FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, A DISTANCE OF 194.02 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 80° 24' 00" WEST ALONG SAID NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, A DISTANCE OF 81.01 FEET; THENCE NORTH 0° 11' 13" EAST PARALLEL TO SAID CENTERLINE OF EAST AVENUE A DISTANCE OF 330.04 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89° 24' 00" EAST PARALLEL TO SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, A DISTANCE OF 111.01 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 0° 11' 13" WEST PARALLEL TO SAID CENTER- LINE OF EAST AVENUE, A DISTANCE OF 170.02 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89° 24' 00" WEST PARALLEL TO SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, A DISTANCE OF 30.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 0° IT 13" WEST PARALLEL TO SAID CENTERLINE OF EAST AVENUE A DISTANCE OF 160.02 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL 3: ALL THAT PORTION OF THE EAST 1/2 OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 6 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT TOWNSHIP PLAT THEREOF, LYING WEST OF THE WEST LINE OF EAST AVENUE, AS SHOWN ON LICENSED LAND SURVEYORS MAP, IN BOOK 2, PAGE 62 RECORD OF SURVEYS, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, AND LYING SOUTH OF THE EASTERLY EXTENSION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 9, BLOCK "Y", ETIWANDA COLONY LANDS, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 2, PAGE 24 OF MAPS, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY. EXCEPT THEREFROM AN UNDIVIDED 1/2 INTEREST OF ALL OIL, GAS AND MINERALS AND AN UNDIVIDED 1/2 INTEREST OF ALL OIL, GAS AND MINERAL RIGHTS UPON AND UNDER THE LAND HEREIN DESCRIBED, AND THE RIGHT TO ENTER THEREON AND TO USE IN A PROPER MANNER SO MUCH OF THE SURFACE AS MAY BE REASONABLE FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXTRACTING THE OIL, GAS AND MINERAL THEREON AND THEREUNDER, AS RESERVED IN THE DEED FROM SECURITY-FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LOS ANGELES, TO WALTER T. CASEY, A MARRIED MAN, RECORDED AUGUST 21, 1937 IN BOOK 1219, PAGE 483 OFFICIAL RECORDS. THE RIGHT OF ENTRY WAS QUITCLAIMED BY THE SECURITY-FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LOS ANGELES, TO THE OWNER OR OWNERS OF RECORD, BY DEED DATED SEPTEMBER 24, 1952 AND RECORDED OCTOBER 10,1952 IN BOOK 3035, PAGE 303 OFFICIAL RECORDS. Page 95 Resolution No. 20XX-XXX – Page 5 of 7 1 9 8 1 NOTE: SAID LAND IS ALSO SHOWN ON LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR'S MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 2, PAGE 62 RECORD OF SURVEYS. Assessor’s Parcels Numbers of the Property: 1100-201-07-0-000 1100-201-03-0-000 1100-201-04-0-000 Page 96 Resolution No. 20XX-XXX – Page 6 of 7 1 9 8 1 Exhibit B Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2021/22 Street Light Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda): Street Light Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda) (the “Maintenance District”) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on local streets in what is termed the South Etiwanda area of the City. Generally, this area encompasses the area of the City east of Etiwanda Avenue, north of Foothill Boulevard and south of Highland Avenue within the incorporated area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets within the South Etiwanda area. Proposed additions to the Improvements for Project Case No. DRC2014-01130: None Page 97 Resolution No. 20XX-XXX – Page 7 of 7 1 9 8 1 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2021/22 Street Light Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda): The rate per Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) is $30.60 for the fiscal year 2021/22. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda) for Case No. DRC2014-01130: Land Use Basis EDU Factor* Rate per EDU* Single Family Residential Parcel 1.00 $30.60 Multi-Family Residential Unit 1.00 30.60 Non-Residential Acre 2.00 30.60 The proposed annual assessment for the property described in Exhibit A is as follows: 193 Units x 1.00 EBU Factor x $30.60 Rate per EBU = $5,905.80 Annual Assessment Page 98 DATE:January 19, 2022 TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY:Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Linda C. Ceballos, Environmental Programs Manager SUBJECT:Consideration of a Resolution Authorizing Submittal of Applications for All CalRecycle Grant and Payment Programs for which the City of Rancho Cucamonga is Eligible. (RESOLUTION NO. 2022-020) (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing submittal of applications for all CalRecycle Grant and Payment Programs for which the City of Rancho Cucamonga is eligible. BACKGROUND: Senate Bill 1383 (SB 1383) was signed into law in September 2016, to address climate change, including the reduction of short-lived climate pollutants. SB 1383 sets targeted dates and guidelines for reducing organic waste disposal in landfills. To meet these goals, the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) is requiring jurisdictions to adopt and enforce actions related to this bill. This enforcement includes: providing organic waste recycling to residents, implementing a food recovery program, conducting outreach and education, procuring recycle organic waste products such as mulch and compost, and maintaining related records. CalRecycle is offering the SB 1383 Local Assistance Grant Program to local jurisdictions to assist with the implementation of regulation requirements associated with SB 1383. ANALYSIS: If approved, staff would be provided with the necessary authorization to apply for any local CalRecycle grant and payment program funds for which the City is eligible, The SB 1383 Local Assistance Grant Program funds cans be utilized for activities such as capacity planning, collection, edible food recovery, education and outreach, enforcement and inspection, program evaluation, procurement requirements, and record keeping. This is a one-time payment, non- competitive grant, and if approved, the City’s share of the grant program has been estimated to be approximately $230,700. FISCAL IMPACT: If the grant application is approved, funding estimated to be in the amount of approximately $230,700 would reduce the City’s local funding costs for implementation of the State mandates und SB 1383. Page 99 Page 2 1 0 9 9 COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: This item relates to the Council Core Value of providing and nurturing a high quality of life for all, by achieving the goals required in the senate bill. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 - Resolution 2022-020 Page 100 Resolution No. 2022-020 - Page 1 of 1 1 9 9 5 RESOLUTION NO. 2022-020 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING SUBMITTAL OF APPLICATION(S) FOR ALL CALRECYCLE GRANT AND PAYMENT PROGRAMS FOR WHICH THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA IS ELIGIBLE WHEREAS, Public Resources Code sections 48000 et seq., 14581, and 42023.1(g), authorize the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) to administer various grant and payment programs in furtherance of the State of California’s (state) efforts to reduce, recycle and reuse solid waste generated by the state, thereby preserving landfill capacity and protecting public health and safety and the environment, and WHEREAS, in furtherance of this authority, CalRecycle is required to establish procedures governing the administration of the payment programs, and administration of the application, awarding, and management of the grant programs, and WHEREAS, CalRecycle’s procedures for administering payment and grant programs require, among other things, applicant’s governing body to declare by resolution certain authorizations related to the administration of the payment and grant program. A. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is authorized to submit an application to CalRecycle for any and all grant and payment programs offered, and Be it further resolved that the City Manager, or his/her designee is hereby authorized and empowered to execute in the name of the City of Rancho Cucamonga all documents, including, but not limited to, applications, agreements, amendments, and requests for payment, necessary to secure funds and implement the approved grant or payment project; and Be it further resolved that these authorizations are effective from the date of adoption through January 19, 2027. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 19 day of January, 2022. ATTACHMENT 1 Page 101 DATE:January 19, 2022 TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY:Robert Neiuber, Human Resources Director Lucy Alvarez-Nunez, Management Analyst SUBJECT:Consideration of a Resolution Approving an Amendment to the Rancho Cucamonga Management Association and Part Time City Positions Salary Schedules for Fiscal Year 2021-2022. (RESOLUTION NO. 2022- 021). (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution amending the Rancho Cucamonga Management Association and Part Time City positions salary schedules for fiscal year 2021-2022. BACKGROUND: The City Council traditionally adopts salary resolutions biannually for classifications employed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. These resolutions are updated to reflect changes in salaries, additions and deletions of classifications, changes in job titles and other terms of employment. ANALYSIS: Amendment to the Part-time City positions salary schedule include the addition of Principal Management Analyst and Fund Development Coordinator. The Principal Management Analyst hourly range is set at the same range as its full-time equivalent. The Fund Development Coordinator hourly range is set at the same range as the Community Services Project Coordinator. Addition of these part time positions will facilitate completion of current projects and the coordination of City-led fundraising for the Library. Amendment to the Rancho Cucamonga Management Association (RCMA) salary schedule includes the addition of Deputy Director of Planning. This new position allows for restructuring of the Department in light of the recent retirement of the Planning Director. The salary range is set at the same range as the Deputy Director of Public Works to reflect the duties of the position. All other salary schedules, classifications, job titles, and other terms of employment remain the same. Staff recommends that the City Council approve the resolution updating the RCMA and Part Time City positions salary schedule for fiscal year 2021-22 to include the aforementioned changes. Page 102 Page 2 1 1 0 1 FISCAL IMPACT: Fiscal impacts associated with adjustments to the salary schedules will be accounted for in the mid-year budget. COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: This item addresses the City’s core values of working towards continuous improvement. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 – Resolution No. 2022-021 Attachment 2 - Rancho Cucamonga Management Association Salary Schedule Attachment 3 - Part Time City Positions Salary Schedule Page 103 RESOLUTION NO. 2022-021 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION AND PART TIME CITY POSITIONS SALARY SCHEDULES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2021-22. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has determined that it is necessary for the efficient operation and management of the City that policies be established prescribing salary ranges, benefits and holidays and other policies for employees of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has previously adopted salary resolutions establishing salary ranges, benefits and other terms of employment for employees of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga recognizes that it is necessary from time to time to amend the salary resolution to accommodate changes in position titles, classifications salary ranges, benefits and other terms of employment; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California to approve the attached updated salary schedules for the Rancho Cucamonga Management Association and Part-Time City positions (Attachments 2-3). PASSED, APROVED AND ADOPTED this 19th day of January, 2022. Page 104 Minimum Control Point Maximum Class Title Step Amount Step Amount Step Amount Accounting Manager 2525 $6,454 2565 $7,878 2585 $8,705 Animal Center Manager 2506 $5,872 2546 $7,168 2566 $7,918 Assistant to the City Manager 2590 $8,925 2630 $10,895 2650 $12,039 Building and Safety Manager 2533 $6,718 2573 $8,199 2593 $9,060 City Planner/Planning Manager 2583 $8,619 2623 $10,520 2643 $11,625 Community Affairs Manager 2565 $7,878 2605 $9,619 2625 $10,626 Community Improvement Manager 2533 $6,718 2573 $8,199 2593 $9,060 Community Services Manager 2506 $5,872 2546 $7,168 2566 $7,918 Community Services Superintendent 2536 $6,819 2576 $8,323 2596 $9,196 Cultural Center Manager 2536 $6,819 2576 $8,323 2596 $9,196 Deputy Director of City Clerk Services 2535 $6,785 2575 $8,281 2595 $9,150 Deputy Director of Community Services 2590 $8,925 2630 $10,895 2650 $12,039 Deputy Dir. Engineering/Deputy City Eng.2590 $8,925 2630 $10,895 2650 $12,039 Deputy Dir. Engineering/Utility Manager 2590 $8,925 2630 $10,895 2650 $12,039 Deputy Director of Engineering 2584 $8,662 2624 $10,574 2644 $11,684 Deputy Director of Finance 2590 $8,925 2630 $10,895 2650 $12,039 Deputy Director of Human Resources 2590 $8,925 2630 $10,895 2650 $12,039 Deputy Dir. of Innovation and Technology 2558 $7,608 2598 $9,287 2618 $10,263 Deputy Director of Library Services 2572 $8,158 2612 $9,959 2632 $11,004 Deputy Director of Planning 2590 $8,925 2630 $10,895 2650 $12,039 Deputy Director of Public Works 2590 $8,925 2630 $10,895 2650 $12,039 Environmental Programs Manager 2539 $6,922 2579 $8,449 2599 $9,335 Facilities Superintendent 2536 $6,819 2576 $8,323 2596 $9,196 Finance Manager 2559 $7,646 2599 $9,335 2619 $10,315 Library Services Manager 2506 $5,872 2546 $7,168 2566 $7,918 Park/Landscape Maintenance Supt 2536 $6,819 2576 $8,323 2596 $9,196 Plan Check & Inspection Manager 2533 $6,718 2573 $8,199 2595 $9,150 Principal Accountant 2532 $6,684 2572 $8,158 2592 $9,014 Principal Engineer 2567 $7,958 2607 $9,713 2627 $10,732 Principal Librarian 2495 $5,558 2535 $6,785 2555 $7,495 Principal Management Analyst 2543 $7,061 2583 $8,619 2603 $9,523 Principal Planner 2537 $6,853 2577 $8,365 2597 $9,241 Procurement Manager 2530 $6,618 2570 $8,078 2590 $8,925 Public Works Maintenance Manager 2566 $7,918 2606 $9,666 2626 $10,679 Revenue Manager 2532 $6,684 2572 $8,158 2592 $9,014 Senior Civil Engineer 2547 $7,203 2587 $8,792 2607 $9,713 Monthly Pay Ranges Effective January 19, 2022 Resolution No. 2022 - 021 ASSIGNMENTS OF CLASSIFICATIONS TO PAY RANGES RANCHO CUCAMONGA MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION ATTACHMENT 2 RCMA Salary SchedulePage105 Minimum Control Point Maximum Monthly Pay Ranges Effective January 19, 2022 Resolution No. 2022 - 021 ASSIGNMENTS OF CLASSIFICATIONS TO PAY RANGES RANCHO CUCAMONGA MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION Senior Executive Assistant 2460 $4,668 2500 $5,698 2520 $6,296 Senior Planner 2517 $6,203 2557 $7,570 2577 $8,365 Street/Storm Drain Maintenance Supt 2536 $6,819 2576 $8,323 2596 $9,196 Traffic Engineer 2569 $8,038 2609 $9,811 2629 $10,842 Utilities Operations Manager 2524 $6,422 2564 $7,840 2584 $8,662 Veterinarian 2579 $8,449 2619 $10,315 2639 $11,395 ATTACHMENT 2 RCMA Salary SchedulePage106 Hourly Pay Ranges Effective January 19, 2022 Part Time Positions Step Amount Step Amount Step Amount Account Clerk 6368 $15.87 6408 $19.37 6449 $23.77 Account Technician 6423 $20.88 6463 $25.49 6497 $30.20 Accountant 6465 $25.74 6505 $31.43 6539 $37.23 Administrative Assistant 6357 $15.02 6372 $16.19 6443 $23.07 Administrative Intern 6357 $15.02 6360 $15.25 6370 $16.02 Animal Behavior Specialist 6388 $17.54 6428 $21.41 6462 $25.36 Animal Care Attendant 6357 $15.02 6389 $17.62 6422 $20.77 Animal Caretaker 6378 $16.69 6418 $20.36 6452 $24.12 Animal Rescue Specialist 6388 $17.54 6428 $21.41 6462 $25.36 Animal Services Dispatcher 6369 $15.95 6409 $19.47 6443 $23.07 Animal Services Officer 6441 $22.84 6481 $27.88 6495 $29.90 Assistant Engineer 6488 $28.88 6528 $35.25 6562 $41.76 Assistant Planner 6468 $26.13 6508 $31.90 6541 $37.61 Associate Engineer 6518 $33.53 6558 $40.94 6592 $48.50 Associate Planner 6487 $28.73 6527 $35.07 6561 $41.55 Box Office Assistant*6357 $15.02 Box Office Specialist 6357 $15.02 6361 $15.33 Budget Analyst 6498 $30.35 6538 $37.05 6588 $47.54 Building Inspector 6464 $25.61 6504 $31.27 6523 $34.38 Business License Clerk 6378 $16.69 6418 $20.36 6452 $24.12 Business License Technician 6408 $19.37 6448 $23.65 6482 $28.02 Community Improvement Officer I 6421 $20.67 6461 $25.23 6495 $29.90 Community Improvement Officer II 6441 $22.84 6481 $27.88 6515 $33.03 Community Programs Coordinator 6450 $23.89 6490 $29.16 6524 $34.55 Community Programs Specialist 6437 $22.39 6477 $27.33 6511 $32.38 Community Services Coordinator 6450 $23.89 6490 $29.16 6529 $35.42 Community Services Specialist 6357 $15.02 6390 $17.71 6424 $20.98 Community Services Supervisor 6480 $27.75 6520 $33.87 6554 $40.13 Community Services Technician 6437 $22.39 6477 $27.33 6511 $32.38 Customer Care Assistant 6357 $15.02 6372 $16.19 6443 $23.07 Day Custodian 6391 $17.79 Department Director 6562 $41.76 6604 $51.50 6707 $86.07 Department Manager 6525 $34.73 6566 $42.60 6634 $59.81 Deputy City Clerk 6430 $21.62 6470 $26.40 6504 $31.27 Division Supervisor 6416 $20.16 6457 $24.74 6554 $40.13 Electrician 6457 $24.74 6497 $30.20 6535 $36.50 Resolution No. 2022-021 Minimum Control Point Maximum PART-TIME CITY POSITIONS ASSIGNMENTS OF CLASSIFICATIONS TO PAY RANGES ATTACHMENT 3 Part-Time City Positions Salary Schedule Page 107 Hourly Pay Ranges Effective January 19, 2022 Part Time Positions Step Amount Step Amount Step Amount Resolution No. 2022-021 Minimum Control Point Maximum PART-TIME CITY POSITIONS ASSIGNMENTS OF CLASSIFICATIONS TO PAY RANGES Energy Efficiency Coordinator 6372 $16.19 6412 $19.77 6422 $20.78 Engineering Aide 6421 $20.67 6461 $25.24 6495 $29.90 Engineering Intern 6357 $15.02 6360 $15.24 6370 $16.03 Engineering Technician 6441 $22.84 6481 $27.88 6515 $33.03 Environmental Resources Intern*6357 $15.02 Equipment Operator 6425 $21.09 6465 $25.75 6503 $31.11 Executive Assistant 6394 $18.07 6434 $22.06 6497 $30.20 Fund Development Coordinator 6514 $32.87 6554 $40.13 6574 $44.34 GIS Intern 6357 $15.02 6360 $15.24 6370 $16.03 GIS Programmer/Analyst 6456 $24.61 6496 $30.05 6506 $31.58 GIS Technician 6436 $22.28 6476 $27.20 6510 $32.22 Healthy Cities Coordinator 6372 $16.19 6412 $19.77 6422 $20.78 Human Resources Clerk 6389 $17.62 6429 $21.51 6462 $25.36 Human Resources Technician 6399 $18.52 6439 $22.61 6465 $25.74 Lead Mechanic 6440 $22.73 6480 $27.75 6518 $33.53 Librarian I 6449 $23.77 6489 $29.01 6509 $32.06 Library Assistant I 6387 $17.44 6427 $21.30 6447 $23.53 Library Assistant II 6428 $21.40 6468 $26.13 6488 $28.87 Library Clerk 6370 $16.02 6410 $19.56 6429 $21.51 Library Director/SIF Trainer 6600 $50.48 6640 $61.63 6650 $64.78 Library Page*6357 $15.02 Library Technician 6407 $19.27 6447 $23.53 6467 $26.00 Maintenance Technician*6357 $15.02 Management Aide 6440 $22.73 6480 $27.75 6514 $32.87 Management Analyst I 6470 $26.40 6510 $32.22 6544 $38.17 Management Analyst II 6498 $30.35 6538 $37.05 6571 $43.68 Management Analyst III 6529 $35.42 6569 $43.24 6588 $47.54 Mechanic 6430 $21.62 6470 $26.40 6508 $31.90 Meter Technician 6487 $28.73 6527 $35.07 6537 $36.86 Office Services Clerk 6369 $15.95 6409 $19.47 6443 $23.07 Office Specialist I 6357 $15.02 6372 $16.19 6382 $17.02 Office Specialist II 6357 $15.02 6392 $17.89 6402 $18.80 Outreach Technician 6357 $15.02 6361 $15.33 Park Ranger*6389 $17.62 Planning Aide 6357 $15.02 6360 $15.24 6370 $16.03 Planning Manager 6583 $46.37 6623 $56.62 6656 $66.74 ATTACHMENT 3 Part-Time City Positions Salary Schedule Page 108 Hourly Pay Ranges Effective January 19, 2022 Part Time Positions Step Amount Step Amount Step Amount Resolution No. 2022-021 Minimum Control Point Maximum PART-TIME CITY POSITIONS ASSIGNMENTS OF CLASSIFICATIONS TO PAY RANGES Plans Examiner I 6474 $26.92 6514 $32.87 6548 $38.94 Playschool Instructor*6373 $16.27 Principal Management Analyst 6557 $40.73 6597 $49.73 6617 $54.94 Principal Engineer 6567 $42.82 6607 $52.27 6640 $61.62 Program Specialist 6357 $15.02 6361 $15.33 Public Services Technician I 6413 $19.86 6453 $24.25 6487 $28.73 Public Services Technician II 6423 $20.88 6463 $25.49 6497 $30.20 Public Services Technician III 6443 $23.07 6483 $28.16 6517 $33.36 Public Works Inspector I 6444 $23.19 6484 $28.31 6518 $33.53 Public Works Inspector II 6464 $25.62 6504 $31.27 6538 $37.05 Purchasing Clerk 6368 $15.87 6408 $19.37 6418 $20.37 Receptionist 6357 $15.02 6382 $17.02 6392 $17.89 Records Clerk 6357 $15.02 6384 $17.19 6432 $21.83 Records Coordinator 6372 $16.19 6412 $19.77 6459 $24.98 Recreation Leader II*6357 $15.02 Secretary 6394 $18.07 6434 $22.06 6444 $23.18 Senior Accountant 6498 $30.35 6538 $37.05 6571 $43.68 Senior Civil Engineer 6543 $37.99 6583 $46.37 6620 $55.77 Signal and Lighting Technician 6452 $24.12 6492 $29.46 6530 $35.60 Theatre Technician I*6357 $15.02 Theatre Technician II*6407 $19.27 Veterinarian 6579 $45.46 6619 $55.50 6652 $65.42 Veterinary Assistant 6407 $19.27 6447 $23.52 6481 $27.88 Veterinary Technician 6437 $22.40 6477 $27.33 6511 $32.38 * Single Step ATTACHMENT 3 Part-Time City Positions Salary Schedule Page 109 DATE:January 19, 2022 TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY:Sean McPherson, AICP, Senior Planner SUBJECT:Consideration of Second Reading and Adoption of the Following: ORDINANCE NO. 992 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONSENTING TO ANNEXATION DRC2020- 00185 AND APPROVING PREZONING DRC2020-00186 IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF TWO NEW INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS TOTALING APPROXIMATELY 655,878 SQUARE FEET ON AN APPROXIMATE 35-ACRE PROJECT SITE LOCATED AT ETIWANDA AVENUE NORTH OF NAPA STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF – APNs: 0229-291-23, 46 AND 54 ORDINANCE NO. 993 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2021-00175 BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND HILLWOOD ENTERPRISES, L.P., TO FACILITATE THE DEVELOPMENT OF TWO NEW INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS TOTALING APPROXIMATELY 655,878 SQUARE FEET ON AN APPROXIMATE 35-ACRE PROJECT SITE LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 650 FEET EAST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE AND NORTH OF NAPA STREET; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF – APN: 0229-291-46 AND 54 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council waive full reading and adopt Ordinance Nos. 992 and 993. BACKGROUND: The introduction and first reading of the above-entitled Ordinances was conducted at the Regular Council meeting of January 5, 2022, 2021. Votes at first reading: AYES: Kennedy, Hutchison, Scott, Spagnolo, Michael. ANALYSIS: Please refer to the December 5, 2021 Planning Commission staff report and January 5, 2022 City Council staff report. FISCAL IMPACT: Please refer to the December 5, 2021 Planning Commission staff report and January 5, 2022 City Council staff report. Page 110 Page 2 1 0 9 3 COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: Please refer to the December 5, 2021 Planning Commission staff report and January 5, 2022 City Council staff report. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 - Ordinance 992 Attachment 2 - Ordinance 993 Page 111 ORDINANCE NO. 992 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONSENTING TO ANNEXATION DRC2020- 00185 AND APPROVING PREZONING DRC2020-00186 IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF TWO NEW INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS TOTALING APPROXIMATELY 655,878 SQUARE FEET ON AN APPROXIMATE 35-ACRE PROJECT SITE LOCATED EAST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE AND NORTH OF NAPA STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF – APNs: 0229-291-23, 46 AND 54. A.Recitals. 1.WHEREAS, Kimley-Horn and Associates, on behalf of Hillwood Enterprises, L.P. (the “Applicant”), filed an application for the approval of Prezoning DRC2020-00186 (the “Prezoning”), as described in the title of this ResolutionThe Prezoning is part of a proposed development of two new industrial buildings totaling approximately 655,878 square feet on an approximately 35-acre project site located approximately 650 feet east of Etiwanda Avenue and north of Napa Street, APNs: 0229-291-23, 46 and 54 (the “Project Site”); and 2.WHEREAS, the portion of the Project Site located within the City and identified as APN 0229-291- 54 is currently zoned as Industrial Employment (IE); and 3.WHEREAS, Prezoning DRC2020-00186 is depicted in Exhibit “A,” attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, and would pre-zone a portion of the Project Site, specifically a 2.9-acre parcel identified as APN: 0229-291-46 and a 0.69-acre portion of a parcel identified as APN: 0229-291-23 currently located within unincorporated San Bernardino County and within the City of Fontana’s Sphere of Influence (the “Annexation Area”), and ultimately incorporate these parcels and portions thereof into the City’s official Zoning Map. To accomplish this objective, the Prezoning would result in the entire Project Site being zonedas Industrial Employment (IE), which would implement the General Plan’s regulating zones across the Project Area; and 4.WHEREAS, the Applicant is expected to submit a petition to annex the unincorporated portions of the Project Site into the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The Applicant has submitted a request to the City to concsent to this annexation, DRC2020-00185 (the “Annexation”). To that end, the City and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District must consent to the annexation and approve plans of service for their respective agencies; and 5.WHEREAS, on December 8th, 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on Annexation DRC2020-00185 and Prezoning DRC2020-00186 and voted unanimously to recommend that the City Council consent to Annexation DRC2020-00185 and approve Prezoning DRC2020-00186; and 6.WHEREAS, on January 5th, 2022, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing and introduced for First Reading of Ordinance 992 adopting Annexation DRC2020- 00185 and Prezoning DRC2020-00186 and concluded said hearing on that date; and 7.WHEREAS, All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B.Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. SECTION 2: Based upon the substantial evidence presented to the City Council during the above-referenced public hearing on January 5th, 2022, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, the City Council hereby specifically finds as follows: Attachment 1 Page 112 a. In addition to Annexation DRC2020-00185 and Prezoning DRC2020-00186, the project scope includes: General Plan Amendment (DRC2020-00184), to assign a land use designation of Industrial Employment District to the Annexation Area; Tentative Parcel Map (SUBTPM20251) to create two new parcels; and Design Review (DRC2020-00177), Conditional Use Permit (DRC2021-00317), and Uniform Sign Program (DRC2020-00178) to permit the use, construction and signage of the proposed project. The project also includes a Development Agreement (DRC2021-00180); and b. The Project Site includes APN 0229-291-46 which is currently located within unincorporated San Bernardino County and within the City of Fontana’s Sphere of Influence and currently has a zoning designation of Regional Industrial (I-R) under San Bernardino County and General Industrial (M-2) under the City of Fontana; and c. The application also requests the Annexation and Prezoning of an additional 0.69-acre portion of a parcel identified as APN: 0229-291-23. This parcel, also currently located within unincorporated San Bernardino County and the City of Fontana’s Sphere of Influence currently has a zoning designation of Regional Industrial (I-R) under San Bernardino County and a zoning designation of Public Utility (P-UC) under the City of Fontana; and d. Upon approval of the Prezoning and following approval of the Annexation by the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO), both parcels APN: 0229-291-46 and APN: 0229-291-23 will be assigned a zoning designation of Industrial Employment (IE) by the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which is consistent with the existing zoning classification of the remainder of the Project Site which is currently located within the City; and e. The City Council and Fire Protection District Board must consent to the Annexation and adopt plans for service for the Annexation Area. f. As reflected in Exhibit “A,” upon approval of the Annexation by LAFCO, these parcels will be assigned a land use designation of Industrial Employment District pursuant to the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan with a zoning designation of Industrial employment (IE). SECTION 3: Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The City Council has independently reviewed the General Plan Consistency Analysis included as Table 4.11-5 in the EIR. The City Council has also considered the changes to the General Plan adopted on December 15, 2021 as the 2020 PlanRC General Plan Update. Based on this comprehensive consistency analysis, the Planning Commission finds that, subject to the City Council’s approval of the related documents and approvals associated with the Project (Annexation DRC2020-00185, Prezoning DRC2020-00186, General Plan Amendment DRC2020-00184, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20251, Design Review (DRC2020-00177), Conditional Use Permit (DRC2021-00317), Uniform Sign Program (DRC2020-00178) and Development Agreement DRC2021-00180, the Annexation and Prezoning would be consistent with the goals, policies and implementation programs of the General Plan and will not conflict with any specific plan applicable to the Project Area. Given that this Prezoning affects parcels located outside of the City and its Sphere of Infuence, the General Plan does not currently address the Annexation Area. The approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2020-00184 will designate the Annexation Area as Industrial Employment under the General Plan and will ensure consistency between the zoning and General Plan. b. Approval of the Annexation and Prezoning would not be materially injurious or detrimental to adjacent properties based on the finding sin the Project’s EIR. c. The findings set forth in this Ordinance reflect the independent judgment of the City Council. SECTION 4: The Annexation and Prezoning, in addition to the General Plan Amendment, Tentative Parcel Map, Design Review Conditional Use Permit, Uniform Sign Program and Development Agreement (collectively, the “Project”) were environmentally reviewed pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the State CEQA Guidelines. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15060(d), the City determined that an EIR would clearly be required for the Project, and therefore prepared an environmental Page 113 impact report (EIR) that focused on the potentially significant effects of the Project. By separate Resolution No. 2022-006, the City Council has: (i) made the required CEQA findings and determinations, (ii) certified the Final EIR; and (iii) adopted a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Project. Resolution No. 2022-006is incorporated herein by reference, and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein. The documents and other materials that constitute the record on which this determination was made are located in the Planning Department and are in the custody of the Planning Director. Further, the mitigation measures set forth therein are made applicable to the Project. SECTION 5: The City Council hereby adopts Prezoning DRC2020-00186. The Official Zoning Map for the City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby amended to assign a zoning designation of “Industrial Employment (IE) Pre-District” for the Annnexation Area parcels of land, as shown in Attachment A. Pursuant to Section 17.22.050 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, the zoning of the Annexation Area shall become effective at the time the proposed annexation for such area becomes effective. Until such time, the Official Zoning Map shall show the prezoning classification with the label “PRE DISTRICT” SECTION 6: The City Council hereby consents to the San Bernardino County LAFCO’s approval of an annexation into the City of Rancho Cucamonga and related sphere of influence amendment for the Annexation Area parcels identified as APNs 0229-291-23 and 0229-291-46. The City Council further approves the plan for service for the Annexation Area attached hereto as Exhibit “B”. SECTION 7: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this Ordinance is, for any reason, deemed or held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, or preempted by legislative enactment, such decision or legislation shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or words thereof, regardless of the fact that anyone or more sections, subsections, clauses, phrases, or words might subsequently be declared invalid or unconstitutional or preempted by subsequent legislation. SECTION 7. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published in the manner prescribed by law. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 19th day of January, 2022. BY: ____________________________________ L. Dennis Michael, Mayor I, JANICE REYNOLDS, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 5th day of January, 2022, and was finally passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 19th day of January, 2022, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCILMEMBERS: ATTEST:_______________________________ City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 114 EXHIBIT A ZONING MAP AMENDMENT Page 115 EXHIBIT B PLAN FOR SERVICE 5000 Birch Street, Suite 3000 Newport Beach, CA 92660 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLAN FOR SERVICE ANNEXATION OF 4.8 ACRES IN CONNECTION WITH PROPOSED SPEEDWAY COMMERCE CENTER PROJECT Prepared for: City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 www.FinanceDTA.com Page 116 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE I INTRODUCTION ......................................................... 1 II DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED SPEEDWAY COMMERCE CENTER PROJECT AND THE 4.8 ACRE ANNEXATION AREA .................................................. 3 A Description of the Project Site ........................................ 3 B Description of the Annexation Area ............................. 4 III PLAN FOR SERVICE BEFORE AND AFTER ANNEXATION OF 4.8 ACRES .................................... 6 IV General Government and Administrative Services .. 8 A Fire Protection and Emergency Response Services .. 9 V Wildland Fire Prevention and Protection ................... 10 VI Law Enforcement .......................................................... 10 VII Library ............................................................................ 10 VIII Parks and Recreation .................................................... 11 IX Animal Control .............................................................. 11 X Street Lighting .................................................................. 11 XI Landscape Maintenance ............................................... 12 XII Water ..................................................................................12 XIII Wastewater .................................................................... 12 XIV Transportation ............................................................... 13 XV Flood Control and Drainage ........................................ 13 XVI Utilities ............................................................................... 14 XVII Schools ........................................................................... 14 XVIII Solid Waste Management ............................................. 14 XIX ONE-TIME DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES .............. 15 Page 117 SECTION I INTRODUCTION www.FinanceDTA.com City of Rancho Cucamonga Speedway Commerce Center Plan for Service November 5, 2021 1 I INTRODUCTION The Speedway Commerce Center project (the “Project”) is currently under consideration for approval by the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City") City Council. The Project site includes an estimated 35.73 acres of vacant land in the eastern portion of the City located approximately 1.3 miles east of Interstate 15 and approximately 1.5 miles north of Interstate 10. An estimated 92% of the Project site is currently located within the City, with t he remainder located in unincorporated San Bernardino County (the “County”) within the City of Fontana Sphere of Influence. The Project has submitted a pre-zone application and annexation proposal for the portion of the Project located in the unincorporated County and certain adjacent property to the west to create a logical boundary into the City from the centerline of Napa Street, east of Etiwanda Avenue and west of the San Sevaine Channel. While all of the Project’s building square footage is to be constructed within 32.83 acres of the Project site that is already located within the City, a remaining 2.9-acre portion of the site consisting solely of a portion of the Project’s parking lot is currently located in the unincorporated County and will need to be annexed into the City. The entire area to be annexed (the “Annexation Area”) will also include 1.9 additional acres that consist of an unmanned parcel owned by Southern Cal Edison (the “SCE Parcel”) on which transmission wires are located, and a portion of the right of way for Napa Street. The intent of this Plan for Service (“PFS”) is to provide the County of San Bernardino Local Agency Formation Commission (“LAFCO”) with sufficient information to assess which public agencies will be responsible for providing municipal services to the Annexation Area once it has been absorbed by the City. DTA is also preparing a separate PFS focusing specifically on the Cucamonga Valley Water District (“CVWD”), which will be annexing not just the Annexation Area, but also the remainder of the Project. As the remainder of the Project is already located in the City, it is not discussed in depth within this Annexation Area PFS, which is why the separate PFS is being prepared to cover the provision of wastewater services by CVWD. While a standard PFS typically also includes information on the fiscal impacts of an annexation action on the City General Fund and the General Funds of other municipal agencies that will be providing the annexed area, this Annexation Area is different because it is expected to include only very minimal development in terms of a 2.9-acre portion of a parking lot and a 1.9-acre SCE parcel containing only electrical transmission lines. Therefore, it is anticipated that no new revenues will be generated within the Annexation Area, and the services to be provided therein will be minimal. However, DTA has previously prepared a fiscal impact analysis (“FIA”) that has been reviewed and approved by the City that analyzes the impacts of the overall Project on the City General Fund. As this FIA (the “Project FIA”) includes the small portion of the Project that is located in the Annexation Area, it will also be submitted separately from this PFS to the City for review and certification in-lieu of a new FIA analyzing just the Annexation Area. Page 118 SECTION I INTRODUCTION www.FinanceDTA.com City of Rancho Cucamonga Speedway Commerce Center Plan for Service November 5, 2021 2 In addition, as the fiscal impacts of the Project on the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (“RCFPD”) and the CHWD were not included in the Project FIA, DTA will also be preparing separate FIAs specifically focusing on the entire Project’s impacts on both of these agencies. Notably, the CHWD fiscal analysis will be packaged together with the separate PFS for CHWD wastewater services previously discussed because the area to be annexed into CHWD will include the entire 35.73-acre Project site, not just the 4.8-acre Annexation Area. Page 119 SECTION II DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED SPEEDWAY COMMERCE CENTER PROJECT AND THE 4.8 ACRE ANNEXATION AREA www.FinanceDTA.com City of Rancho Cucamonga Speedway Commerce Center Plan for Service November 5, 2021 3 II DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED SPEEDWAY COMMERCE CENTER PROJECT AND THE 4.8 ACRE ANNEXATION AREA A Description of the Project Site The Project site, as depicted in Figure 1 below, encompasses approximately 35.73 acres of vacant land in the eastern portion of the City and is located directly south of the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway, directly west of San Sevaine Channel, north of Napa Street in the City and County, and east of the East Etiwanda Creek channel. Figure 1: Aerial Map for Proposed Project Site The Project site is proposed to be developed into two industrial buildings totaling approximately 655,878 square feet of new warehouse space and related on-site and off-site improvements. A summary of the land uses and building square footage (“BSF”) associated with each land use in the Project is listed below in Table 1. The conceptual site plan for Buildings A and B within the Project is illustrated in Figure 2 below. Page 120 SECTION II DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED SPEEDWAY COMMERCE CENTER PROJECT AND THE 4.8 ACRE ANNEXATION AREA www.FinanceDTA.com City of Rancho Cucamonga Speedway Commerce Center Plan for Service November 5, 2021 4 Table 1: Proposed Land Uses for the Project Land Use BSF Building A - Warehouse 500,648 Building B - Warehouse 155,230 Figure 2: Proposed Speedway Commerce Center Project B Description of the Annexation Area The proposed Annexation Area consists of 4.8 acres that include 2.9 acres representing the southeast portion of the proposed Speedway Commerce Center project (the “Project”), as well as 1.9 acres made up of an undeveloped parcel containing transmission wires owned by Southern Cal Edison (“SCE”) and a portion of Napa Street right of way. A map delineating the Annexation Area is shown below in Figure 3. Page 121 SECTION II DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED SPEEDWAY COMMERCE CENTER PROJECT AND THE 4.8 ACRE ANNEXATION AREA www.FinanceDTA.com City of Rancho Cucamonga Speedway Commerce Center Plan for Service November 5, 2021 5 Figure 3: Proposed Annexation Area for Speedway Commerce Center Project As reflected in Figures 2 and 3 above, the 2.9-acre portion of the Annexation Area is anticipated to be used solely as a portion of the Project’s parking lot, with the SCE parcel continuing its current use as a transmission tower site. Page 122 SECTION III PLAN FOR SERVICE BEFORE AND AFTER ANNEXATION OF 4.8 www.FinanceDTA.com City of Rancho Cucamonga Speedway Commerce Center Plan for Service November 5, 2021 6 III PLAN FOR SERVICE BEFORE AND AFTER ANNEXATION OF 4.8 ACRES As noted previously, the Annexation Area consists of a 4.8-acre portion of the Project and adjacent SCE Site that is currently being serviced by the County that will need to be annexed into the City. However, as neither the City nor the County provide certain required municipal services, the Annexation Area will also be subject to annexations to additional districts, as detailed below. However, as noted previously, the entire Project, as opposed to just the Annexation Area, will be annexed into CVWD to obtain sewer services. As the entire Project encompasses 35.7 acres, which is significantly larger than the 4.8-acre Annexation Area, DTA has prepared an entirely separate PFS covering wastewater services that will be submitted directly to CHWD for review and confirmation, and is not included in this PFS. The list of municipal services necessary to serve the Annexation Area are the following: General Government and Administrative Services; Fire Protection and Emergency Response Services; Sheriff/Police and Public Safety Services; Library; Parks and Recreation; Animal Control; Street Lighting; Landscape Maintenance; Water; Wastewater; Transportation; Flood Control and Drainage; Utilities; Schools; and Solid Water Management. Table 2, below, provides a summary of which public agencies are currently responsible for providing each type of municipal service now, prior to the annexation, as well as which public agency is anticipated to be providing that same service after the annexation. In addition, one- time development impact fees (“DIFs”) are collected by a number of public agencies to fund the capital costs of public facilities, as summarized in Section IV of this Study. Page 123 SECTION III PLAN FOR SERVICE BEFORE AND AFTER ANNEXATION OF 4.8 www.FinanceDTA.com City of Rancho Cucamonga Speedway Commerce Center Plan for Service November 5, 2021 7 Table 2: Municipal Services Providers for Proposed Annexation Area 1 Municipal Services Current Municipal Provider Future Municipal Provider After Annexation General Government and Administrative Services2 County of San Bernardino City of Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection and Emergency Response Services  Fontana Fire Protection District (“FFPD”) contract with County of San Bernardino Fire Department; and  American Medical Response. Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (“RCFPD”); and American Medical Response Sheriff/Police and Public Safety County of San Bernardino Sheriff's Department City contract with County of San Bernardino Sheriff's Department Library San Bernardino County Public Library Rancho Cucamonga Public Library Parks and Recreation Regional Facilities Local Facilities County of San Bernardino None County of San Bernardino Rancho Cucamonga Community Services Department Animal Control San Bernardino County Animal Care and Control Rancho Cucamonga Animal Care and Services Department Street Lighting None Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility (“RCMU”); and Citywide street lighting district. Landscape Maintenance San Bernardino County Rancho Cucamonga Public Works Services Department Water Inland Empire Utilities Agency (“IEUA”) – wholesale; and Fontana Water Company (“FWC”). IEUA – wholesale; and FWC. Sewer IEUA – regional. IEUA – regional; and Cucamonga Valley Water District. Transportation Freeways and Interchanges Transit Cal Trans Omnitrans Cal Trans Omnitrans 1 Some of the municipal services listed may not apply to the Proposed Annexation Area because it is anticipated that only a parking lot and unmanned utility easement will be located within that area. However, should future development plans change, the municipal services providers responsible for managing the public facilities associated with that future development are listed in this table. 2 Including General municipal administration, planning and community development services, economic development, local road operation and maintenance (“O&M”), street lighting O&M, local parks O&M, and human resources, among other services. Page 124 SECTION III PLAN FOR SERVICE BEFORE AND AFTER ANNEXATION OF 4.8 www.FinanceDTA.com City of Rancho Cucamonga Speedway Commerce Center Plan for Service November 5, 2021 8 Municipal Services Current Municipal Provider Future Municipal Provider After Annexation Flood Control and Drainage Regional Facilities Local Facilities San Bernardino County Flood Control District San Bernardino County - Public Works San Bernardino County Flood Control District Rancho Cucamonga Public Works Services Department Utilities Cable/Internet Provider/Phone Power Natural Gas Charter Communications, Spectrum, and Frontier Southern California Edison Southern California Gas Company Charter Communications, Frontier, and RCMU RCMU Southern California Gas Company Schools Etiwanda School District (K-8); and Chaffey Joint Union High School District (9-12) Etiwanda School District (K-8); and Chaffey Joint Union High School District (9-12) Solid Waste Management Burrtec Waste Management Industries through franchise agreement with San Bernardino County Solid Waste Management Division. Burrtec Waste Management Industries through franchise agreement with City of Rancho Cucamonga. A written narrative describing the pre-annexation and post-annexation provision of each service listed above follows: A General Government and Administrative Services A.1 Before Annexation The County currently provides general government and administrative services to the Annexation Area. These include certain services that the County only provides in the unincorporated County, such as planning and community development services, economic development, arterial, collector and other local road operation and maintenance (“O&M”), street lighting and local parks O&M and human resources, among other services. In addition, the County provides certain services on a Countywide basis to both cities and the unincorporated County, such as criminal justice services related to jails and courts, which include district attorney, public defender and probation services, as well as health and welfare services and other Countywide functions. A.2 After Annexation The City will assume responsibility for all of the administrative and general government services that had been previously provided by the County exclusively for unincorporated County areas. As discussed above, these would include planning Page 125 SECTION III PLAN FOR SERVICE BEFORE AND AFTER ANNEXATION OF 4.8 www.FinanceDTA.com City of Rancho Cucamonga Speedway Commerce Center Plan for Service November 5, 2021 9 and community development services, economic development, local road and street light O&M, etc. within the Annexation Area. The City’s road maintenance responsibilities would include the operations and maintenance of the ½ width of Napa Street that is being annexed into the City. However, the other services currently provided by the County on a Countywide basis, as also discussed above, will continue to be the County’s responsibility within the Annexation Area. These would include criminal justice services, health and welfare services, etc. B Fire Protection and Emergency Response Services B.1 Before Annexation FFPD currently provides the fire protection and emergency response services to the Annexation Area. FFPD, through contract with the San Bernardino County Fire Department, serves approximately 52.4 square miles (“SM”), encompassing 42.4 SM within the limits of the City of Fontana and 10 SM within Fontana’s Sphere of Influence area (“SOI”). The Annexation Area is primarily served by Fire Station 73, located at 14360 Arrow Boulevard in Fontana. American Medical Response provides private ambulance services. B.2 After Annexation The RCFPD will provide the fire protection and emergency response services to the Annexation Area after its annexation. RCFPD encompasses approximately 50 SM of service area within the City limits and the City's SOI. The Annexation Area will be served by (i) the Jersey Fire Station, located at 11297 Jersey Boulevard, which is approximately 3 roadway miles west of the Annexation Area, and (ii) Day Creek Fire Station, located at 12270 Firehouse Court, which is approximately 3.3 roadway miles to the northwest of the Annexation Area. Based on its proximity to two existing fire stations, the Annexation Area will be adequately served by fire protection services, and no new or expanded unplanned facilities would be required. In addition, the entire Project site, including the portion within the Annexation Area, is required to be annexed into Community Facilities District (“CFD”) No. 85-1 as one of the City’s conditions of development approval. CFD No. 85-1 was initially approved by the qualified voters within the CFD in a special election to authorize the levy of a special tax to fund fire suppression services and facilities within the boundaries of Archibald Avenue, Etiwanda Avenue, Highland Avenue and Fourth Street. The American Medical Response, a private ambulance service, provides ambulance services to the Annexation Area. AMR is located at 7925 Center Avenue in Rancho Cucamonga. Page 126 SECTION III PLAN FOR SERVICE BEFORE AND AFTER ANNEXATION OF 4.8 www.FinanceDTA.com City of Rancho Cucamonga Speedway Commerce Center Plan for Service November 5, 2021 10 C Wildland Fire Prevention and Protection C.1 Before Annexation FFPD, through a contract with the San Bernardino County Fire Department, currently provides the wildfire prevention and protection services to the Annexation Area. C.2 After Annexation RCFPD will provide the wildfire prevention and protection services to the Annexation Area after its annexation. D Law Enforcement D.1 Before Annexation The San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department (“SBCSD”) provides public safety services to the unincorporated areas. D.2 After Annexation Since incorporation in 1977, law enforcement services in the City have been provided through a contract with SBCSD. The closest police station to the Annexation Area is the Victoria Gardens Substation, located at 7743 Kew Avenue, which is approximately 2.5 roadway miles northwest of the Annexation Area. In addition, the Police Department Headquarters (SBCSD Rancho Cucamonga Patrol Station) is located at 10510 Civic Center Drive, which is approximately 3.9 roadway miles northwest of the Annexation Area. Furthermore, a joint facility including a police substation and several other municipal offices, is proposed at the Empire Lakes development located approximately 3.8 roadway miles west of the Annexation Area. Based on its proximity to these existing and proposed police stations and their projected staffing levels, the Annexation Area will be adequately served by existing police protection services, and no new or expanded unplanned facilities would be required. E Library E.1 Before Annexation Currently, the Annexation Area is served by the San Bernardino County Library system. The nearest County library is the Fontana Lewis Library & Technology Center, located at 8437 Sierra Avenue in Fontana. E.2 After Annexation The Rancho Cucamonga Public Library will serve the Annexation Area after its annexation. The closest City library to the Annexation Area is the Paul A. Biane Library, located at 12505 Cultural Center Drive, which is approximately 2.4 roadway miles northwest of the Annexation Area. Page 127 SECTION III PLAN FOR SERVICE BEFORE AND AFTER ANNEXATION OF 4.8 www.FinanceDTA.com City of Rancho Cucamonga Speedway Commerce Center Plan for Service November 5, 2021 11 F Parks and Recreation F.1 Before Annexation The County Regional Parks Department (“CRPD”) provides regional park services to all residents and employed persons within the County, including located in both incorporated and unincorporated areas. The closest regional park is Cucamonga Guasti Regional Park in Ontario, which includes recreational areas for water sports, hiking and picnicking. But CRPD’s mandate is only to provide regional park facilities, so it does not support the construction, operations or maintenance of local parks anywhere within its jurisdiction, including within the Annexation Area. F.2 After Annexation The City’s Community Services Department will operate and maintain the City’s local parks and recreation facilities after annexation. This City Department currently supports the operations and maintenance of over 30 local park sites within the City which are available for use by residents and employed persons located within the Annexation Area., The largest park and recreational facilities operated by this City Department includes the Community Center at Lions East and Lions West, Family Resource Center, Central Park Senior/Community Center, Rancho Cucamonga Sports Center, Epicenter/Sports Complex, and Victoria Gardens Cultural Center. G Animal Control G.1 Before Annexation The San Bernardino County Animal Care and Control Program currently operates two animal shelters within the County, located in Big Bear and Devore, both of which are relatively distant from the Annexation Area. G.2 After Annexation The Rancho Cucamonga Animal Care and Services Department will provide animal control services to the Annexation Area after its annexation. The Department’s animal shelter facilities are located at 11780 Arrow Route in the City. H Street Lighting H.1 Before Annexation The Annexation Area presently does not contain any streetlights. H.2 After Annexation Upon annexation, RCMU will be responsible for operating and maintaining streetlights in the Annexation Area. The Annexation Area is conditioned by the City to be annexed into SLD No. 1, which is the City’s street lighting finance district, Page 128 SECTION III PLAN FOR SERVICE BEFORE AND AFTER ANNEXATION OF 4.8 www.FinanceDTA.com City of Rancho Cucamonga Speedway Commerce Center Plan for Service November 5, 2021 12 I Landscape Maintenance I.1 Before Annexation Currently, the County is responsible for the limited amount of landscape maintenance required within the Annexation Area. I.2 After Annexation Upon annexation, the City’s Public Works Department will be responsible for providing operations and maintenance services for the landscaping of any publicly owned parkways and medians within the Annexation Area, including operations and maintenance work on the ½ width of Napa Street that is being annexed into the City. J Water J.1 Before Annexation FWC is a local water company currently providing water treatment, storage, and distribution of domestic water to the Annexation Area. FWC owns and operates three water treatment facilities, treating a combination of well and surface water. In 2020, water utilized within the City originated from three main sources; (i) approximately 60% groundwater, (ii) 15% local surface water, and (iii) 25% water from the State Water Project. Groundwater is produced from Chino Basin, Rialto Basin and Lytle Basin, and an unnamed basin. Local surface water from Lytle Creek and imported surface water from the State Water Project originating in Northern California are treated at the Sandhill Water Treatment Plant, a 29 million-gallon-per-day (MGD) treatment plant that is comprised of a 12 MGD Conventional filtration treatment facility and a 17 MGD Diatomaceous Earth filtration treatment facility. IEUA is a state water contractor for the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (“MWD”), and is a regional wholesaler that delivers water at an average of 1.5 billion gallons of water per day to a 5,200 square mile service area. J.2 After Annexation FWC will continue to be the retail water service provider for the Annexation Area after its annexation, and IEUA will continue to be its wholesale water supplier. K Wastewater K.1 Before Annexation IEUA is a regional wastewater treatment agency and wholesale distributor of imported water that operates wastewater treatment facilities. The entire Project site, including the portion within the Annexation Area, currently does not receive any local wastewater services. Page 129 SECTION III PLAN FOR SERVICE BEFORE AND AFTER ANNEXATION OF 4.8 www.FinanceDTA.com City of Rancho Cucamonga Speedway Commerce Center Plan for Service November 5, 2021 13 K.2 After Annexation IEUA will continue to be the regional wastewater treatment agency for the Annexation Area, while the CVWD will be the local wastewater service provider for the Annexation Area. CVWD currently operates and maintains approximately 421 miles of wastewater collection system ranging from 8 to 36 inches in diameter. Wastewater generated by the Project site would be transported through this collection system and conveyed to IEUA’s RP-1 and RP-4 regional water recycling plants where it is processed into recycled water. IEUA owns and operates a system of regional trunk and interceptor sewers that transport wastewater to the regional wastewater treatment plants. In order to avoid overloading issues at any one facility, wastewater can be diverted from one regional plant to another. As the entire Project, not just the Annexation Area, will be annexed into CVWD, a PFS and FIA are required to analyze the annexation of the entire Project into CVWD. These two analyses are being prepared separately from this Annexation Area PFS, and will be submitted to CVWD upon their completion. L Transportation L.1 Before Annexation Caltrans currently operates and maintains freeways located in unincorporated County, while, as noted in Section A.1 of this study, arterials, collectors and other local roads are operated and maintained by the County Public Works Department. Omnitrans provide public transit in the unincorporated County. L.2 After Annexation Caltrans and Omnitrans will continue to provide freeway and public transit services to the Annexation Area once the annexation has been completed. As noted previously in Section A.2, the City will be responsible for the operations and maintenance of local roads within the Annexation Area. M Flood Control and Drainage M.1 Before Annexation The County Flood Control District provides operations and maintenance services for regional flood control facilities, while any local drainage facilities, such as neighborhood detention basins, channels and bioswales are managed by the County’s Public Works Department. M.2 After Annexation The County Flood Control District will continue to manage regional flood control facilities on behalf of the Annexation Area, whereas the City’s Department of Public Works will take over responsibilities for the local drainage facilities cited above. Page 130 SECTION III PLAN FOR SERVICE BEFORE AND AFTER ANNEXATION OF 4.8 www.FinanceDTA.com City of Rancho Cucamonga Speedway Commerce Center Plan for Service November 5, 2021 14 N Utilities N.1 Before Annexation The current providers of cable television and internet service within the area are Charter Communications, Spectrum and Frontier Communications. Telephone services are also provided by Frontier Communications, whereas electricity is supplied by Southern California Edison and natural gas by Southern California Gas Company. N.2 After Annexation Most of the utility services in the Annexation Area will continue to be maintained by the same private parties, with the exception of cable service and electricity, which will be furnished by RCMU. O Schools O.1 Before Annexation The local primary elementary school is being operated by the Etiwanda School District (“ESD”). High School facilities are the responsibility of Chaffey Joint Union High School District (“CJUHSD”). O.2 After Annexation Both primary and secondary school services will continue to be the responsibility of ESD and CJUHSD, respectively. P Solid Waste Management P.1 Before Annexation Burrtec Waste Management Industries currently provides waste and recycling services to the Annexation Area through a franchise agreement with the County Solid Waste Management Division. P.2 After Annexation Burrtec Waste Management Industries will continue to provide waste and recycling services to the Annexation Area after its annexation, although its franchise agreement will be executed with the City rather than with the County, Page 131 SECTION City of Rancho Cucamonga Speedway Commerce Center Plan for Service November 5, 2021 15 ONE-TIME DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES IV ONE-TIME DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES Development impact fees (“DIFs”) are one-time fees utilized to fund a project’s fair share of a municipality’s infrastructure and capital needs, and are generally paid upon issuance of building permits and/or Certificates of Occupancy. As noted previously, the Annexation Area consists of 4.8 acres that will include the following anticipated land uses: 2.9 acres representing the southeast portion of the Project that is anticipated to be used solely as a portion of the Project’s parking lot; 1.9 acres of SCE-owned parcel containing transmission wires; and A portion of the Napa Street right of way. Based on these currently proposed land uses within the Annexation Area, no structures are to be built within the area, so no DIFs are anticipated to be collected within the Annexation Area itself. Only portions of the Project outside of the Annexation Area on which structures are to be built would require the payment of DIFs, and they would be paying DIFs equal to the Project’s fair share of the capital costs of public facilities necessitated by the structures built on the Project site. Notably, if the development plan for the Project changes such that the Annexation Area would include actual development other than the currently anticipated parking lot, DIFs could be collected. However, as DIF levels generally vary dependent upon the land use types being constructed, specific fee levels cannot be assigned to the Annexation Area at this time. www.FinanceDTA.com Page 132 H748-028 -- 4210543.1 ORDINANCE NO. 993 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2021-00175 BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND HILLWOOD ENTERPRISES, L.P., TO FACILITATE THE DEVELOPMENT OF TWO NEW INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS TOTALING APPROXIMATELY 655,878 SQUARE FEET ON AN APPROXIMATE 35-ACRE PROJECT SITE LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 650 FEET EAST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE AND NORTH OF NAPA STREET; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF – APN: 0229-291-46 AND 54. A.Recitals. 1.WHEREAS, Kimley-Horn and Associates, on behalf of Hillwood Enterprises, L.P. (the “Applicant”), filed an application for and negotiated the terms of Development Agreement DRC2021-00175, as described in the title of this Ordinance and attached hereto as Exhibit 1. Hereinafter in this Ordinance, the subject development agreement is referred to as the “application" or the “Development Agreement;” and 2.WHEREAS, On December 8, 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date at which point the Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend that the City Council approve Development Agreement DRC2021-00175; and 3.WHEREAS, On January 5, 2022, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing, concluded said hearing on that date, and thereafter introduced for first reading this Ordinance ; and 4.WHEREAS, All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B.Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows: SECTION 1. The City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. SECTION 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to the City Council during the above-referenced public hearing on January 5, 2022, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, the City Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to the approximately 35-acre project site which comprises two parcels, APN: 0229-291-46 and 0229-291-54. The project site is located approximately 650 feet east of Etiwanda Avenue, north of Napa Street. The project site is Attachment 2tachment 21 Page 133 -2- H748-028 -- 4210543.1 largely vacant, with an existing rail spur running in a north-south orientation roughly bisecting the site which serves properties to the south and existing Southern California Edison (SCE) overhead powerlines traversing the site in an east-west orientation. The existing rail spur is proposed to remain; however, the existing overhead SCE powerlines are proposed to be relocated, running east-west at the northern property line within the western portion of the project site, at which point the lines would turn south, and near the frontage of the property be made to run roughly parallel to Napa Street within the eastern portion of the project site. The proposed project includes the construction of one new north-south street which will be located along the westerly property line of the project area and will be designed to eventually connect to a future east-west street located immediately south of the Metrolink railway and parallel to Napa Street; and b. Concurrent with this application, the Applicant represented that it will apply to the San Bernardino County Local Area Formation Commission for Annexation (DRC2020- 00185) to annex APN: 0229-291-46 and a portion of APN: 0229-291-23 into the City of Rancho Cucamonga, among other conforming changes of organization; General Plan Amendment (DRC2020-00184) to assign a land use designation to parcels, and portions thereof, to be annexed; Pre-Zoning (DRC2020-00186) to assign a pre-zoning designation to those parcels to be annexed; Tentative Parcel Map (SUBTPM20251) to create two new parcels; and Design Review (DRC2020-00177), Conditional Use Permit (DRC2021-00317) and Uniform Sign Program (DRC2020-00178) to permit the use, construction and signage of the proposed project; and c. Development of the project is governed by the City’s General Plan, Development Code, all entitlements associated with the project, and the subject Development Agreement between the City and Owner’s predecessor in interest; and d. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning Designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning* Site Vacant Industrial Employment District (for portion within City); General Industrial (GI)/ General Industrial (I- G) (for portion within County/Fontana SOI) Industrial Employment (IE) District (for portion within City); Regional Industrial (IR) (within County) and General Industrial (M-2) (for portion within Fontana SOI) North Industrial Industrial Employment District Neo-Industrial (NI) District South Industrial (County/Fontana SOI) General Industrial (GI), Special Development (SD)/General Industrial (I-G) (within County/Fontana SOI) Regional Industrial (IR); Kaiser Commerce Center Specific Plan (KC/SP)/General Industrial (M-2) (within County/Fontana SOI) Page 134 -3- H748-028 -- 4210543.1 West Industrial and East Etiwanda Creek Industrial Employment District Industrial Employment (IE) District East San Sevaine Channel Open Space (OS) and General Industrial (GI) (within County/Fontana SOI) Regional Industrial (IR)/Open Space-Natural (OS-N) (within County/Fontana SOI) *Prior to the adoption of Ordinance 982, the Industrial Employment (IE) zoning district was referred to as the Heavy Industrial (HI) district and the Neo-Industrial (NI) district was referred to as the General Industrial (GI) district. e. The Project is for the development of two new industrial warehouse buildings on two new parcels of land: Building A will total approximately 500,648 square feet including approximately 10,000 square feet of office space and Building B will total approximately 155,230 square feet and include an office area of approximately 10,000 square feet square feet. The Project requires 183 parking stalls and 79 trailer loading stalls for Building A and 97 parking stalls and 20 trailer loading stalls for Building B. Accordingly, the Project provides 275 parking stalls and 87 trailer loading stalls for Building A, and 108 parking stalls and 20 trailer loading stalls for Building B; and f. As part of the Project, and in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), the City has prepared Environmental Impact Report SCH No. 2020090076 (EIR), which analyzed the potential environmental impacts of the Project and related approvals; and g. Pursuant to Section 17.22.060 of the Development Code, Development Agreements have been determined to be beneficial to the public in that: i. Development Agreements increase the certainty in the approval of development projects, thereby preventing the waste of resources, reducing the cost of development to the consumer, and encouraging investment in and commitment to comprehensive planning, all leading to the maximum efficient utilization of resources at the least economic cost to the public. ii. Development Agreements provide assurance to the applicant for a development project that upon approval of the Project, the applicant may proceed with the Project in accordance with existing policies, rules and regulations, and subject to conditions of approval, thereby strengthening the public planning process, encouraging private participation in comprehensive planning, and reducing the economic costs of development. iii. Development Agreements enable the City to plan for and finance public facilities, including, but not limited to, streets, sewerage, transportation, drinking water, school, and utility facilities, thereby removing a serious impediment to the development of new housing.” h. The proposed Development Agreement Amendment is being made and entered into for the Project to ensure that the above three goals are fulfilled; and Page 135 -4- H748-028 -- 4210543.1 i. The Project complies with all requirements of the Development Code including setbacks, parking, design, and landscape coverage; and SECTION 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to the City Council during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Sections 1 and 2 above, the City Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed Project is consistent with the General Plan. The proposed industrial warehouse project will be consistent with the General Plan with the approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2020-00184. The Project site comprises two parcels: APN: 0229-291-54 and 0229-291-46. APN: 0229-291-54 which is located within the City of Rancho Cucamonga and has a general plan land use designation of Industrial Employment District. APN: 0229-291-46 which is currently located within unincorporated San Bernardino County and within the City of Fontana’s Sphere of Influence and which is proposed to be annexed into the City of Rancho Cucamonga as part of this project, has a general plan land use designation by San Bernardino County of General Industrial (GI) and a land use designation by the City of Fontana as General Industrial (I-G). Concurrent with the proposed annexation, the proposed General Plan Amendment will amend the land use designation of the parcels to be annexed to Industrial Employment District, a land use designation which permits the proposed industrial use. b. The proposed use is in accord with the objective of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. Storage Warehouses are permitted within the Industrial Employment (IE) District subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. Conditional Use Permit DRC2021-00317 was submitted for the operation of a Storage Warehouse. The Project will be in compliance with the Zoning Map with approval of the related Pre-Zoning DRC2020-00186, which will amend the zoning designation of the parcels to be annexed to a pre-zoning designation of Industrial Employment (IE) District. c. The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. The Project will be in compliance with the Development Code with approval of the related General Plan Amendment DRC2020-00184 and Pre-Zoning DRC2020- 00186. Storage Warehouses are permitted within the Industrial Employment (IE) District upon the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. The Project complies with all other development criteria outlined in the Development Code including setbacks, parking and design. d. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The related environmental review outlines potential environmental impacts related to the Project and identifies project-specific mitigation measures that reduce these impacts to less-than-significant. The proposed use will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or be materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. SECTION 4. The Development Agreement, in addition to the Annexation, Pre-Zoning, General Plan Amendment, Tentative Parcel Map, Design Review, Conditional Use Permit and Uniform Sign Program (collectively, the “Project”) were environmentally reviewed pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the State CEQA Guidelines. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15060(d), the City determined that an EIR would clearly be required for the Project, and therefore prepared an environmental impact report (EIR) that focused on the potentially significant effects of the Project. By separate Resolution No. 2022-006, the City Council has: (i) made the required CEQA findings and determinations, (ii) certified the Final EIR; and (iii) adopted a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Project. Resolution No. 2022- Page 136 -5- H748-028 -- 4210543.1 006is incorporated herein by reference, and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein. The documents and other materials that constitute the record on which this determination was made are located in the Planning Department and are in the custody of the Planning Director. Further, the mitigation measures set forth therein are made applicable to the Project. SECTION 5. On the basis of the foregoing and the totality of the administrative record before it, the City Council hereby approves Development Agreement DRC2021-00175 as shown in Exhibit 1. SECTION 6. If any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase in this Ordinance or any part thereof is for any reason held to be unconstitutional, invalid, or ineffective by any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity or effectiveness of the remaining portions of this Ordinance or any part thereof. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed each section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared unconstitutional, invalid, or ineffective. SECTION 7. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published in the manner prescribed by law. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 19 TH DAY OF JANUARY 2022. CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: L. Dennis Michael, Mayor I, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 19th day of January 2022, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ATTEST:_______________________________ City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 137 -6- H748-028 -- 4210543.1 EXHIBIT 1 Development Agreement RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: Janice C. Reynolds City Clerk 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER’S USE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. DRC2021-00175 REGARDING THE SPEEDWAY COMMERCE PROJECT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA THIS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (this “Agreement” or this “Development Agreement”) is made and entered into as of the “Effective Date” set forth herein, by and between SPEEDWAY COMMERCE CENTER DEVELOPMENT, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Developer”), and the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a California municipal corporation (“City”). RECITALS Developer is owner of the “Site” as set forth herein and generally described as a 35.73-acre site comprising Assessor Parcel Numbers (APNs) 0229-291-54 and 0229-291-46, and has a legal interest in the real property subject to this Agreement. The latter parcel is located in unincorporated San Bernardino County, which Developer seeks to annex into the City of Rancho Cucamonga. On January 5, 2022, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (“Council”) adopted the following resolutions: Resolution No. 2022-001, approving General Plan Amendment DRC2020-00184; Resolution No. 2022-002, approving Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20251; Resolution No. 2022-003, approving Design Review DRC2020-00177; Resolution No. 2022-004, approving Conditional Use Permit DRC2021-00317; Resolution No. 2022-005, approving Uniform Sign Program DRC2020-00178; Resolution No. 2022-006, certifying, after making appropriate findings, an Environmental Impact Report (“EIR”) identified as SCH No. 2020090076. Page 138 -7- H748-028 -- 4210543.1 On January 5, 2022, the Council introduced Ordinance No. 992 and following second reading adopted Ordinance No. 992, approving Pre-Zoning Amendment DRC2020-00186. The annexation of the Site includes a jurisdiction boundary change and sphere of influence amendments for two parcels, including APN 0229-291-46 that constitutes part of the Site, located within the County of San Bernardino and within the City of Fontana sphere of influence. In addition, the annexation application is expected to include APN 0229-291-23, a parcel of approximately 0.69-acres, which is not a part of the Site. Developer will be the applicant to LAFCO for the foregoing annexation. The City agrees to take any necessary actions required by State law or LAFCO rules and regulations for submittal of the annexation by Developer to LAFCO. Collectively, the resolutions identified in section 2 of the recitals and ordinance identified in section 3 of the recitals (collectively, “Project Entitlements”) amended the City’s land use regulations to permit the development and operation of the Site with two high-cube warehouse buildings for a distribution/fulfillment center with ancillary office space, including the 500,648 square foot (“sf”) Building A and 155,230 sf Building B, along with the construction of a new public roadway, internal drive aisles, parking, on-site landscaping, lighting, utility connections, and related infrastructure and improvements. California Government Code Section 65864, et seq. authorizes cities to enter into binding development agreements with persons having legal or equitable interests in real property for the development of such property. City and Developer mutually desire to enter into this Development Agreement to develop the Project in accordance with the terms set forth herein. On January 5, 2022, the City Council introduced Ordinance No. 993 (the “Approving Ordinance”), and following second reading adopted Ordinance No. 993, thereby approving this Development Agreement between the City and Developer. The Approving Ordinance is effective as of ________________. All requirements of the California Environment Quality Act have been met with respect to the Project, Project Entitlements, and this Agreement, and this Agreement is consistent with the City’s General Plan. AGREEMENT NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows: Section 1. Definitions. In this Agreement, unless the context otherwise requires, the following terms shall have the following meaning: “Approving Ordinance” means Ordinance No. 993, which approved this Agreement. “Building A” means the 500,648 sf building identified as “Building A” in the Development Plan. “Building B” means the 155,230 sf building identified as “Building B” in the Development Plan. “City” means the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Page 139 -8- H748-028 -- 4210543.1 “Community Benefit Fee” means any fee required under section 11(B) of this Agreement. “Developer” means Speedway Commerce Center Development, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company “Development Plan” means those plans, specifications, and images attached hereto, collectively marked as Exhibit “C” and incorporated herein by this reference. “Effective Date” shall mean the date that the Approving Ordinance becomes effective. “ITE Manual” means the Institute of Traffic Engineers’ Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition. “LAFCO” means the San Bernardino County Local Area Formation Commission. “Material Handling Equipment” shall mean all equipment intended for use in connection with the Project’s operation for the purpose of loading or unloading goods and materials, including all forklifts. “MMRP” shall refer to the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program included in the Project’s Final EIR and on file in City’s Planning Department. “Non-Sort Use” means a fulfillment center that ships large box items that are processed primarily with automation rather than through manual means, as defined in the ITE Manual. The authority to determine in a particular case whether a use is a “Sort Use” or a “Non-Sort Use” shall be vested in the Planning Director and City Engineer of the City and shall be exercised reasonably using the ITE Manual and based on the applicable facts and circumstances. “Project” means the proposed development of the Site, consistent with the terms and conditions of the Project Entitlements. “Project Entitlements” mean the Resolutions and Ordinance described in recitals sections 2 through 3. “Site” means the real property that is the subject of the Project Entitlements and as legally described, depicted and identified in Exhibit “A-1” and Exhibit “A-2”. “Sort Use” means a fulfillment center that ships out smaller items, requiring extensive sorting, typically by manual means, as defined in the ITE Manual. The authority to determine in a particular case whether a use is a “Sort Use” or a “Non-Sort Use” shall be vested in the Planning Director and City Engineer of the City and shall be exercised reasonably using the ITE Manual and based on the applicable facts and circumstances. “Term” means the initial six (6) year term of this Agreement, beginning from the Effective Date, and any extension pursuant to section 6. “TIA” means the Project’s Traffic Impact Analysis and CEQA Transportation Impact Analysis Warehouse Scenario, E-Commerce Scenario and 100% E-Commerce Scenario TIA and VMT, dated February 18, 2021, prepared by Translutions, Inc., included as an appendix to the Page 140 -9- H748-028 -- 4210543.1 Environmental Impact Report prepared for the Project and on file in the City’s Engineering Services Department, which is incorporated herein by this reference. Recitals. The recitals are part of this Agreement and shall be enforceable as any other provision of this Agreement. Interest of Developer. Developer warrants and represents that, as of the Effective Date, it will have legal title to or an equitable interest in the Site; that it has full legal right to enter into this Agreement; and that the persons executing this Agreement on behalf of Developer have been duly authorized to do so. Binding Effect of Agreement. Developer hereby subjects the Project and the Site to the covenants, reservations, and restrictions as set forth in this Agreement. The City and the Developer hereby declare their specific intent that the covenants, reservations and restrictions as set forth herein shall be deemed covenants running with the land and shall pass to and be binding upon Developer’s successors and assigns in title or interest to the Project and/or Site. Each and every contract, deed or other instrument hereinafter executed, covering or conveying the Project and/or Site or any portion thereof shall conclusively be held to have been executed, delivered, and accepted subject to the covenants, reservations and restrictions expressed in this Agreement, regardless of whether such covenants, reservations and restrictions are set forth in such contract, deed or other instrument. The City and Developer hereby further declare their understanding and intent that the benefit of such covenants, reservations, and restrictions touch and concern the land by enhancing and increasing the enjoyment and use of the Site by Developer and the future occupants of the Project, the intended beneficiaries of such covenants, reservations and restrictions, and by furthering the public purposes for which this Agreement is adopted. Relationship of Parties. It is understood that the contractual relationship between City and Developer is such that City and Developer are each an independent party and neither is the agent or partner of the other for any purpose whatsoever and neither shall be considered to be the agent or partner of the other for any purpose whatsoever. Term of Agreement. The Term of this Agreement shall commence on the Effective Date and shall continue for six (6) consecutive calendar years thereafter, unless the Term is otherwise terminated, modified, or extended in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement. So long as there are no material changes to the Project, the Developer is not then in breach beyond the notice and cure periods set forth in this Agreement, and the Developer has made all payments to the City as required pursuant to this Agreement, Developer has an option to extend the Term one time for an additional nine (9) years for a total Term of fifteen (15) years. To exercise this option, Developer must, no less than ninety (90) days’ prior to the expiration of the Term, both: (i) provide City with written notice of the intent to exercise the option and (ii) pay to City two million dollars ($2,000,000.00). Upon receipt of such notice and payment, City shall provide written confirmation that the Developer’s option to extend the Term has been exercised and accepted. The Term shall not be extended until City provides written notice of confirmation to Developer, which Page 141 -10- H748-028 -- 4210543.1 notice shall not be unreasonably withheld and shall be provided prior to the expiration of the Agreement provided that Developer has provided required notice and full payment. Timing of Development. Because the California Supreme Court held in Pardee Construction Co. v. City of Camarillo, 37 Cal.3d 465 (1984), that failure of the parties to provide for the timing of development resulting in a later adopted initiative restricting the timing of development to prevail over such parties’ agreement, it is the parties’ intent to cure that deficiency by acknowledging and providing that Developer shall have the right (without obligation), subject to the provisions of this Development Agreement, to complete the Project in such order and at such rate and at such times as Developer deems appropriate within the exercise of its subjective business judgment. Assignment. In the event of a proposed transfer of interest in the Site or any portion thereof or in this Agreement by Developer to a transferee, Developer agrees to comply with the following conditions: (i) At least thirty (30) days prior to any such assignment, Developer shall provide the City with written notice thereof along with written evidence and documentation, of a form and substance reasonably satisfactory to the City, demonstrating the experience, capability, competence, and financial ability of the proposed assignee to carry out and complete the Development Plan and comply with the terms of this Agreement. (ii) At least thirty (30) days prior to any such assignment, Developer shall also provide evidence that the transferee will assume in writing through an assignment and assumption agreement all remaining obligations of Developer under this Agreement. The assignment and assumption agreement shall be in a form reasonably satisfactory to the City Attorney. (iii) The City Manager shall have consented to the assignment of this Agreement, which consent will not be unreasonably withheld, provided that the City Manager shall consent to any assignment of this Agreement to a transferee if Developer provides satisfactory evidence pursuant to paragraph (i) that the proposed transferee owns property and assets valued at forty million dollars ($40,000,000) or more at that time of the proposed transfer. Any assignment of this Agreement not made in strict compliance with the foregoing conditions shall constitute an event of default by the Developer pursuant to section 18. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the terms, covenants and conditions of this Agreement shall be binding upon any transferee whether or not such an assignment and assumption agreement is signed by the assignee upon acquiring the Property. General Standards and Restrictions Pertaining to Development of the Site. The following specific restrictions shall apply to the use of the Site pursuant to this Development Agreement: Page 142 -11- H748-028 -- 4210543.1 Developer shall have the right to develop and operate the Project on the Site in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement and the Project Entitlements and City shall have the right to control development of the Site in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement and the Project Entitlements. The type, density, intensity, configuration of uses, size, and location of buildings and other improvements and provisions for the reservation or dedication of land for public purposes, location of public improvements, together with other terms and conditions of development applicable to the Site, shall be as set forth in this Development Agreement, including the Development Plan, and the Project Entitlements, except as modifications may be made pursuant to section 16. All public improvements, including landscaping, irrigation, sidewalk, traffic improvements and public streets, as set forth in the Development Plan, Project Entitlements, and this Development Agreement, shall be installed by the Developer in the time and manner described in the Development Plan, Project Entitlements, and this Development Agreement. Developer and the City acknowledge that a portion of the Site is not currently located within City’s municipal’s limits (“Unincorporated Land”) and that, as to the Unincorporated Land, the Project Entitlements are contingent upon approval of the annexation by LAFCO and completion of annexation of the Unincorporated Land to the City. In the event Developer seeks to record Parcel Map 20251 prior to completion of the annexation, Developer shall produce evidence reasonably satisfactory to the City that the County of San Bernardino (“County”) has approved Tentative Parcel Map 20251 in compliance with all applicable State and County laws and regulations, in addition to applicable City laws and regulations, prior to the City signing the final parcel map and allowing it to be recorded in the Official Records of County. In addition, provided that the Developer produces reasonable evidence that County has approved the precise grading plan or plans for one or both of the buildings on the Site and that Developer has otherwise satisfied technical grading plan check requirements, City shall issue grading permits for one or both of the buildings (including areas within the Unincorporated Land) before completion of annexation. In addition, City is informed that no vertical structures are located within the Unincorporated Land and based on that information agrees to issue building permits for one or both of the buildings before completion of annexation, subject only to Developer complying with City’s standards for issuance of such building permits and any applicable County laws and regulations to City’s reasonable satisfaction. Effect of City Regulations on Development of Project. Developer is entitled to protections afforded by the development agreement statute, Government Code Section 65864 et seq., including a vested right to develop the Project site in accordance with the rules, regulations and official policies in effect as of the Effective Date. No future modification of City’s code or ordinances, or adoption of any code, ordinance, regulation, whether adopted by the City Council or through the initiative or referendum process, which conflicts with this Agreement shall apply to the Property or modify this Agreement without amendment hereto to so provide by the parties. However, notwithstanding the foregoing, the City acknowledges that, pursuant to Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 17.02.020, Ordinance No. 982 does not apply to the Project’s Entitlements, which are governed by the regulations in effect when the applications were deemed Page 143 -12- H748-028 -- 4210543.1 complete (January 7, 2021), except as expressly addressed herein. This provision does not apply to Conditional Use Permit DRC2021-00317, which covers the uses contemplated by this Agreement, but which was not deemed complete prior to the effective date of Ordinance No. 982. This paragraph 10.A is intended to confirm the application of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 17.02.020 to the Project, which shall continue to apply upon the termination or expiration of this Agreement. Except as otherwise provided in Section 11.B.vi, the provisions of this section 10 shall not preclude the application to the development of the Site those changes in City ordinances, regulations, plans, or specifications which are specifically mandated and required by changes in state or federal laws or regulations as provided in California Government Code Section 65869.5 or any successor provision or provisions. In the event such changes in the law prevent or preclude compliance with one or more of the provisions of this Agreement, such provisions of this Agreement shall be modified or suspended or performance thereof delayed, as may be necessary to comply with such changes in the law. The category of Development Impact Fees (“DIF”) applicable to the Project shall be those in effect as of the Agreement’s Effective Date (i.e. new DIF categories which may be adopted by the City after the Agreement’s Effective Date shall not apply to the Project), however the existing DIF and other development fees associated with the construction and development of the Project, including but not limited to land use approvals, development fees, building permits, etc., shall be pursuant to the rates as annually adjusted and in effect at the time application is made for such approvals or permits. Nothing herein shall prevent the application of health, safety, and accessibility regulations (e.g., fire, building, seismic, plumbing, and electric codes and requirements under the Americans with Disabilities Act or similar accessibility statute) that become applicable to the City as a whole. The parties acknowledge and agree that the City is restricted in its authority to limit its police power by contract and that the limitations, reservations and exceptions set forth in this section 10 are intended to reserve to the City all of its police power which cannot be so limited. Developer’s Obligations. In consideration of the rights and benefits Developer is guaranteed under this Agreement, Developer agrees to provide each and every one of the community benefits and other measures set forth in this section 11. Material Handling Equipment. Developer shall cause the City of Rancho Cucamonga to be designated as the point of sale for the Material Handling Equipment used in the Project’s operations. In addition, Developer shall include a requirement in all tenant leases that tenants shall cause the City of Rancho Cucamonga to be designated as the point of sale for the Material Handling Equipment used in the Project’s operations. City shall be a third party beneficiary to all such terms included in tenant leases. Provided that Developer complies with the requirements herein, Developer shall not be in default of this Agreement if a tenant fails to cause the City of Rancho Cucamonga to be designated as a point of sale for the Material Handling Equipment used in that tenant’s operations. Page 144 -13- H748-028 -- 4210543.1 Community Benefit Fee. Developer shall pay to City the Community Benefit Fees in the amount and schedule as set forth below. The Community Benefit Fees are intended to address affordable housing demand, fire protection services, environmental justice, and related increases to City services associated with warehouse development. Community Benefit Fee amount and schedule: Payment Amount Due Payment 1 $2,150,000.00 Upon issuance of a grading permit, provided that no grading permit shall be issued until the fee is paid. Payment 2 $2,150,000.00 Upon issuance of a certificate of occupancy for either Building A or Building B, provided that no certificate of occupancy shall be issued until the fee is paid. If a Community Benefit Fee payment is scheduled to be due, pursuant to the schedule above, after the Term of this Agreement, then such community benefit fee payment shall automatically become due and owing on the final day of the Term. Developer may pay any of the Community Benefit Fee payments in advance of the scheduled due date, which early payment shall reduce the Consumer Price Index (CPI)-based inflationary increase applied to such payments pursuant to paragraph (v) below. Up to thirty percent (30%) of the Community Benefit Fees received by City, as identified in paragraph (i) above, shall be refunded to Developer if, within the Term of this Agreement, a Project tenant generates five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000.00) in sales tax to the City annually for any three (3) consecutive years, provided that Developer can demonstrate that the tenant responsible for generating five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000.00) in sales tax received by the City for any three (3) consecutive year period has a lease covering the entire Term of this Agreement. Alternatively, up to fifteen (15%) of the Community Benefit Fees received by City, as identified in paragraph (i) above, shall be refunded to Developer if, within the Term of this Agreement, a Project tenant is a manufacturing business operating within City as of the Effective Date that has relocated to the Site. The refund shall be paid to Developer thirty (30) days following the expiration of the Term. By way of example only, if the tenant of Building A generates five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000.00) during each of years three, four, and five of the Term, then City shall refund to Developer an amount equal to one million two hundred ninety thousand ($1,290,000.00). The City shall have no further reimbursement obligation after this Agreement has expired. Any Community Benefit Fee payment made after the first anniversary of the Effective Date of this Agreement is considered a deferred Community Benefit Fee payment and is subject to a CPI-based inflationary increase, if any, based on the CPI – All Urban Consumers for Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario California as published by the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics (or any successor thereto). Under no circumstance will the amount of each deferred Community Benefit Fee payment be lower than the amount identified in the table above. Page 145 -14- H748-028 -- 4210543.1 The Community Benefit Fee being paid by Developer pursuant to section 11 satisfies all but one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) of the public arts fees required by Ordinance 912. Developer shall have the right to satisfy the remaining one hundred thousand dollars (100,000) either through the procurement of art or the payment of an in-lieu fee in that amount. Payment of the Community Benefit Fees above shall fully satisfy any future commercial linkage fee adopted by the City, even if said fees are higher than the amounts specified above. Late Charges, Interest. If Developer fails to pay a Community Benefit Fee payment by the due date, City shall give written notice to Developer (or its successor) of such delinquency in accordance with section 24. If Developer fails to pay the Community Benefit Fee within thirty (30) days after such notice is served on Developer (the “Period to Cure”) then Developer shall pay a late charge in the amount equal to one quarter of one percent (0.25%) of the Community Benefit Fee due but not paid. The Parties acknowledge and agree that the amount of the costs and expenses that City will incur in the event the Community Benefit Fee is not paid when due is extremely difficult to calculate, and that the late charge set forth in the immediately preceding sentence is a reasonable, good faith estimate of such costs and expenses, but payment of such late charge shall not limit the City’s remedies following any default by Developer under this Agreement. If any Community Benefit Fee, is not paid within the Period to Cure, then such Community Benefit Fee (including any late charge) shall also bear interest, from the due date until paid, at the rate that is the lesser of (i) ten percent (10%) per annum, or (ii) the highest rate permitted by applicable law. Traffic Improvements. The traffic improvements identified in paragraphs (i) and (ii) below shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, no later the date of issuance of the certificate of occupancy of the Project’s first building. In the event that Developer is unable to complete the construction of any improvement by the date of issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the Project’s first building, despite Developer’s commercially reasonable efforts, due to processing, required coordination with other projects, or other issues outside of Developer’s control, then Developer shall issue a bond, satisfactory in form and value to the City Engineer, for the remaining work and shall be obligated to complete the required improvement within one year of issuance of the certificate of occupancy for the Project’s first building. For those improvements identified below requiring coordination and approval by Caltrans, if any, City shall cooperate with Developer on Developer’s efforts to obtain Caltrans approval; however, if Developer is unable to achieve 90% plan check review, as determined by the City Engineer, despite commercially reasonable efforts, due to processing delays by Caltrans, then issuance of grading and building permits for the Project shall not be delayed provided that all other requirements for issuance of grading and building permits have been met. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the City will only issue a temporary certificate of occupancy for the Project until the improvements that require Caltrans approval are completed. Unless the improvements are completed within one year, the temporary certificate of occupancy shall expire, unless an extension is mutually agreed to by both Parties. Non-Sort Use Improvements. Developer shall construct the following traffic improvements and dedicate the necessary right-of-way consistent with the demands outlined in the Project’s TIA for a Non-Sort Use and determined necessary by the City Engineer: Page 146 -15- H748-028 -- 4210543.1 Etiwanda Avenue & 6th Street: Install a traffic signal. [DIF] I-15 SB Ramps & Ontario Mills Dr./4th St: Modify the traffic signal to implement a 130-second cycle length and overlap phasing for the WB right turn lane, restripe the SB approach to provide one left turn lane, one through lane, and dual right turn lanes, and modify the traffic signal to implement overlap phasing for NB and SB right turn lanes. [P] Sort Use Improvements. Developer shall construct the following traffic improvements and dedicate the necessary right-of-way consistent with the demands outlined in the Project’s TIA for a Sort Use and determined necessary by the City Engineer: a. Milliken Ave. & 4th St: Modify the traffic signal to implement overlap phasing on the WB right turn lane & modify the traffic signal to implement overlap phasing for the EB right turn lane; [P] c. Etiwanda Ave. & Arrow Rte: Stripe 2nd SB left turn lane; [P] e. Etiwanda Ave. & Napa St.: Add a northbound right-turn lane with overlap phasing, add overlap phasing to the westbound right-turn lane and add a second westbound left-turn lane; f. Haven Ave. & 4th St: Modify the traffic signal to implement an optimized cycle length; and g. Etiwanda Ave. & I-10 EB Ramps: Restripe the eastbound shared left and right-turn lane to a dedicated right-turn lane. Reimbursement. An improvement identified as [P] in paragraphs (i) and (ii) above is eligible for a 50% reimbursement of the actual costs if first constructed by Developer and the same improvement is also required to be constructed by the Bridge Point development. Developer may receive reimbursement of fifty percent (50%) of the actual cost of these improvements if the improvements are first constructed by Developer and the same improvements are also required to be constructed by the Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga project located at 12434 4th Street. Alternatively, if the improvement is first constructed by the Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga project, then Developer shall pay a reimbursement to the City, which will be passed through to the Bridge Point Rancho Cucamonga project’s developer, equal to fifty percent (50%) of the actual cost of the improvements and is not required to construct the improvements. Improvements identified as [DIF] are currently listed in the City’s Transportation Development Impact Fee Program and are eligible for credit and/or reimbursement up to the amounts identified in the program as of the date of payment of the Transportation Development Impact Fees. If these improvements are constructed by others prior to the development of this project, no credits or reimbursements shall be owed to Developer. Satisfaction of Conditions of Approval. Developer’s provision of traffic improvements pursuant to this section 11(C) will satisfy any Condition of Approval pertaining to the impacts mitigated by the required traffic improvements and will serve as a substitute for the traffic improvements described above. Page 147 -16- H748-028 -- 4210543.1 Fair Share Payment in lieu of Remaining Traffic Improvements. In lieu of constructing the opening year and horizon year (2040) traffic improvements outlined in the TIA but not described above, Developer shall have the right to pay a fair share fee into the City’s Industrial Area Traffic Improvement Fund, equivalent to the amounts set forth in Exhibit “B” (the “Fair Share Fee”). The Fair Share Fee shall be due prior to issuance of the first certificate of occupancy for the Project. Developer’s payment of the Fair Share Fee for remaining traffic improvement pursuant to this section 11(D) will satisfy any Condition of Approval pertaining to required contributions to the City’s Industrial Area Traffic Improvement Fund for impacts mitigated by the improvements listed in the TIA but not required to be constructed in section 11(C)(i) or (ii) and such improvement shall not be required to be constructed. New Public Street. Developer shall construct, consistent with the City’s standards and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, a new public street on the west side of the Project site from Napa Street to the Project’s northerly property line with APN 0229-291-55, to be classified as an Industrial Collector (66-foot full-width right-of-way), as shown in Exhibit D of this Agreement, including a depiction of the proposed cross-section for the new public street with one travel lane, landscaped parkway, and a sidewalk in each direction. Developer shall be responsible for all costs associated with the design and construction of the new public street. City shall accept dedication of the public street and the related improvements in the same manner as it accepts other similar public improvements constructed as part of private development projects in the City upon completion of the public street and related improvements. Developer shall provide a standard one- year warranty for the improvements, excluding normal roadway wear and tear. No certificate of occupancy for any project component will be issued for the Project until the improvements are completed and accepted by the City which the City shall not unreasonably delay. Developer’s provision of a new public street pursuant to this section 11(E) will satisfy any Condition of Approval pertaining to required provision of a new public street on the west side of the Project site from Napa Street to the Project’s northerly property line with APN 0229-291-55. Financing Districts. The City may initiate (i) proceedings to form one or more special assessment districts (each, an “Assessment District”) to levy special benefit assessments (the “Special Benefit Assessments”) or (ii) proceedings to form one or more Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (Government Code Sections 53311 et seq.) Community Facilities Districts (each, a “CFD,” and collectively, with the Assessment Districts, the “Districts,” or individually, a “District”) to levy special taxes (the “CFD Taxes”), to finance the maintenance and operation of public streets, parkways, medians, public right-of-ways, public safety, and any other improvements or services benefiting properties within all industrial zones throughout the City (the “Maintenance Services”). Developer shall not oppose the formation of any District or the annexation of lands to any District, and shall vote in favor of any such Special Benefit Assessments or CFD Taxes for a District; provided, however, that in no event shall the annual total, combined amount of the Special Benefit Assessments and CFD Taxes for the Districts exceed seven thousand five hundred dollars and zero cents ($7,500.00) per acre for the Site (the “Max Levy”). The Max Levy shall increase annually by an amount determined necessary to fund the Maintenance Services, but such annual increase shall be no less than two percent (2%) and no more than six percent (6%). Developer shall satisfy its obligations under this paragraph 11(F) prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy for the Project. The provisions of this paragraph 11(F) shall not apply to or affect the validity of any existing Assessment District or CFD applicable to the Site as of the Effective Date. Page 148 -17- H748-028 -- 4210543.1 Solar Panels and Purchase Agreement. Developer shall install a solar collector system that covers a percentage of the Project’s total roof area, with such percentage based on the formula outlined in Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 17.76.020(B), as amended by Ordinance No. 982, which requires in part that the renewable energy system shall be built to generate an amount of electricity sufficient to meet the following criteria: (a) annualized building demand based on the approved use; and (b) annualized demand required to charge fully electric vehicles and trucks, assuming that all vehicles and trucks to the site are fully electric; and (c) a reasonable rate of efficiency loss over 10 years. Such percentage shall be established pursuant to a study to be prepared by Developer and approved by the City, with City review time fully reimbursed by the Developer and paid prior to any issuance of the first building permit. The final percentage of required roof area coverage shall be confirmed by the City Engineer. The Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility (“RCMU”) and Developer agree to negotiate and execute a power purchase agreement (“Power Purchase Agreement”) within six (6) months of the Effective Date, provided that no Certificate of Occupancy shall be issued for the Project until the power purchase agreement is executed. A sample power purchase agreement is attached as Exhibit “E” to this Agreement. The solar collector system shall be metered separately from the metered power usage demand of the Project’s two buildings. The Power Purchase Agreement will commit the City to purchase all electricity produced by the Project at market rate for at least 25 years, which market rate shall be specified in the executed Power Purchase Agreement. RCMU Connection. The Project shall utilize RCMU for electricity and high-speed broadband. Developer shall extend all required infrastructure for electricity and high-speed broadband (“Required Infrastructure”) onto the Project site at the locations identified in Exhibit “F.” “Required Infrastructure” shall include all underground ducts and structures from a point of connection to established RCMU service facilities at the stub out identified in Exhibit “F” in the street or public right of way, surface mounted equipment (except for transformers), and cabling to serve both buildings on the Site. This requirement shall satisfy any Condition of Approval pertaining to the Project’s electric and fiber optic connection to RCMU. Other City Fees. The Community Benefit Fee being paid by Developer pursuant to section 11 satisfies all but one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) of the public arts fees required by Ordinance 912. Developer shall have the right to satisfy the remaining one hundred thousand dollars (100,000) either through the procurement of art or the payment of an in-lieu fee in that amount. Otherwise, Developer will be responsible for other applicable existing development fees. MMRP Compliance Costs. The MMRP includes mitigation measures applicable to the Project that may require City to verify compliance outside of City’s plan check process for the Project. Accordingly, Developer shall reimburse City for all compliance costs, including City staff and consultant time and expenses, incurred in verifying Developer’s compliance with the MMRP, except for such costs associated with mitigation measures that are verified during plan check and recovered by City through development fees. City shall submit an invoice for such costs on an as- needed basis and Developer shall pay the invoice to City within thirty (30) days of receipt. Undergrounding In-Lieu Fee. Pursuant to Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 16.36.090, Developer may pay a fee to City in the amount of one million four hundred thousand dollars ($1,400,000.00) in lieu of undergrounding existing distribution and telecommunications facilities on the Site or along streets peripheral to the Site (“Distribution Facilities”). If Developer Page 149 -18- H748-028 -- 4210543.1 elects to pay the fee in lieu of undergrounding the Distribution Facilities, then City may use such funds for utility undergrounding projects anywhere within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. This requirement shall satisfy any Condition of Approval pertaining to the Project’s utility undergrounding. Developer’s obligations under this section 11 may extend past the Term of this Agreement. Therefore, this section 11 shall survive the expiration or termination of the Term; provided, however, that upon termination of this Agreement pursuant to section 27 below, all of Developer’s obligations hereunder shall be terminated and of no further force and effect. City’s Obligations. The City shall reasonably expedite review and processing of all plans and issuance of all permits associated with the Project. The City shall refund not more than thirty percent (30%) or fifteen percent (15%), as the case may be, of the community Benefit Fee payments identified in section 11(B)(i), consistent with and provided the provisions and conditions of section 11(B)(iii) are satisfied. Annual Review. During the Term of this Development Agreement, City shall annually review the extent of good faith compliance by Developer with the terms of this Development Agreement. Developer shall file an annual report with the City providing information regarding compliance with the terms of this Development Agreement no later than sixty (60) days prior to the anniversary of the Effective Date. Annual reports shall include all information necessary for the City to assess Developer’s compliance with the terms and provisions of this Agreement. Developer shall have the right to cause the annual report to be filed by any lessee then occupying the Site provided, however, that Developer shall remain primarily responsible for such filing. Indemnification and Legal Challenge. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Developer agrees to, and shall, defend, indemnify and hold City and its elected officials, officers, contractors serving as City officials, agents, and employees (“Indemnitees”) harmless from liability for damage and/or claims for damage for personal injuries, including death, and claims for property damage, and with respect to all other actions and liabilities for damages caused or alleged to have been caused by reason of Developer’s activities in connection with the construction of the Project or Developer’s operation of the permitted use, and which may arise from the direct or indirect operations of Developer or those of Developer’s contractors, agents, tenants, employees or any other persons acting on Developer’s behalf, which relate to the Developer’s construction of the Project or operation of the permitted use. This indemnity provision applies to all damages and claims for damage, as described above, regardless of whether or not the City prepared, supplied, or approved the plans, specifications, or other documents for the Project. Notwithstanding, the foregoing indemnity shall not include indemnification against (i) suits and actions brought by Developer by reason of City's default or alleged default hereunder, or (ii) suits and actions caused solely by or resulting solely from City's acts or omissions, or (iii) suits and actions arising from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of City; provided further, however, that the foregoing indemnity shall not apply to claims pertaining to City’s operation of those portions of the Site dedicated to City after the dedication thereof. Page 150 -19- H748-028 -- 4210543.1 In the event of any legal action challenging the validity, applicability, or interpretation of any provision of this Agreement, any of the Project Entitlements including, without limitation, the City’s General Plan, Zoning Ordinance, Design Review, EIR, or any other supporting document relating to the Project, the Developer shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the Indemnitees, and each of them, with respect to all liability, costs and expenses incurred by, and/or awarded against, the City or any of the Indemnitees in relation to such action. The City shall have the right to select counsel of its choice. The parties hereby agree to cooperate in defending such action. In the event of any litigation challenging the effectiveness of this Agreement, or any portion hereof, this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect while such litigation, including any appellate review, is pending, unless otherwise ordered by the court. Absent issuance of an injunction, the Developer may elect to continue development under this Agreement pending completion of the litigation but it shall do so at its sole risk, and the City shall not be liable for any loss suffered as a result thereof. Amendments. This Agreement may be amended or canceled, in whole or in part, only by mutual written consent of the parties and then in the manner provided for in California Government Code Section 65868, et seq., or successor provisions thereto. Minor Amendments to Development Plan. Upon the written application of Developer, minor modifications and changes to the Development Plan, including modifications to the building design or footprint affecting setbacks, parking layout and design, and landscape design may be approved by the Planning Director. Substantial changes in the Development Plan, as determined by the Planning Director, shall be processed through the process required by law to amend or modify the Development Plan. Upon the approval of substantial changes to the Development Plan, Developer and City shall amend this Agreement to memorialize and acknowledge the revised Development Plan. Enforcement. In the event of a default under the provisions of this Agreement by Developer, City shall give written notice to Developer (or its successor) by registered or certified mail addressed at the address stated in this Agreement, and if such violation is not corrected to the reasonable satisfaction of City within thirty (30) days after such notice is served on Developer, or if not corrected within such reasonable time as may be required to cure the breach or default if said breach or default cannot be cured within said thirty (30) days (provided that acts to cure the breach or default must be commenced within said thirty (30) days and must thereafter be diligently pursued by Developer), then City may, without further notice, declare a default under this Agreement and, upon any such declaration of default, City may bring any action necessary to specifically enforce the obligations of Developer growing out of the operation of this Development Agreement, apply to any court, state or federal, for injunctive relief against any violation by Developer of any provision of this Agreement, or apply for such other relief as may be appropriate. Event of Default. Developer is in default under this Agreement upon the happening of one or more of the following events or conditions: Page 151 -20- H748-028 -- 4210543.1 If a material warranty, representation or statement made or furnished by Developer to City set forth herein or in any document incorporated by reference herein is false or proved to have been false in any material respect when it was made; If a finding and determination is made by City following an annual review pursuant to section 13 hereinabove, upon the basis of substantial evidence, that Developer has not complied in good faith with any material terms and conditions of this Agreement, after notice and opportunity to cure as described in section 17 hereinabove; or A breach by Developer of any of the provisions or terms of this Agreement, after notice and opportunity to cure as provided in section 17 hereinabove. No Waiver of Remedies. City does not waive any claim of defect in performance by Developer if on periodic review City does not enforce this Agreement. Nonperformance by Developer shall not be excused because performance by Developer of the obligations herein contained would be unprofitable, difficult or expensive or because of a failure of any third party or entity, other than City. Subject to the provisions of Section 20, all other remedies at law or in equity which are not otherwise provided for in this Agreement are available to each party to pursue in the event that there is a breach of this Development Agreement by the other party (subject to applicable notice and cure periods). No waiver by City or Developer of any breach or default under this Development Agreement by the other party shall be deemed to be a waiver of any other subsequent breach thereof or default hereunder. City Not Liable For Damages. It is acknowledged by the parties that the City would not have entered into this Agreement if it could be held liable in damages under or with respect to this Agreement or the application thereof. Consequently, and except for the payment of attorney’s fees in accordance with this Agreement, the City shall not be liable in damages to the Developer, or to any assignee, transferee or any other person, and the Developer covenants on behalf of itself and its successors in interest not to sue for or claim any damages: For any breach of this Agreement; For the taking, impairment or restriction of any right or interest conveyed or provided hereunder or pursuant hereto; Arising out of or connected with any dispute, controversy or issue regarding the application or interpretation or effect of the provisions of this Agreement; or For any injury to or interference with the rights of the property owner, allegedly or actually arising out of, or incurred in connection with, the parties entering this Agreement, or their exercise of any rights under this Agreement. The parties hereby warrant that each enters into this Agreement with the understanding that if the City defaults on its obligations under this Agreement due to an action taken by the electorate of the City in the exercise of the reserved powers of initiative and referendum, this Agreement shall be modified or suspended to the extent required by Government Code Section 65869.5 and the Developer’s right to seek specific performance, a writ of mandate, or other mandatory relief shall Page 152 -21- H748-028 -- 4210543.1 be limited by such force as the action taken by the electorate may have in light of state law as determined by any court of competent jurisdiction, in which case the Developer’s principal remedy shall lie in reformation of this Agreement Rights of Lenders Under this Agreement. Should Developer place or cause to be placed any encumbrance or lien on the Project, or any part thereof, the beneficiary (“Lender”) of said encumbrance or lien shall have the right at any time during the term of this Agreement and the existence of said encumbrance or lien to: Do any act or thing required of Developer under this Agreement, or cure any default of Developer under this Agreement within the time limits set forth in section 17, and any such act or thing done or performed by Lender or cure shall be as effective as if done by Developer; Realize on the security afforded by the encumbrance or lien by exercising foreclosure proceedings or power of sale or other remedy afforded in law or in equity or by the security document evidencing the encumbrance or lien (hereinafter referred to as “a trust deed”); Transfer, convey or assign the title of Developer to the Project to any purchaser at any foreclosure sale, whether the foreclosure sale be conducted pursuant to court order or pursuant to a power of sale contained in a trust deed; and Acquire and succeed to the interest of Developer by virtue of any foreclosure sale, whether the foreclosure sale is conducted pursuant to a court order or pursuant to a power of sale contained in a trust deed. Should any Lender require or request an amendment of this Agreement in respect of the rights and remedies granted to a Lender, City hereby agrees to execute and deliver such an amendment so long as the proposed amendment does not materially and adversely affect the rights, powers, and remedies of the City in respect of a default by Developer hereunder. Notice to Lender. City shall give written notice of any default or breach under this Agreement by Developer to Lender (if known by City) simultaneously with such notice of default City gives to Developer and afford Lender the opportunity after receipt of service of the notice to: Cure the breach or default within thirty (30) days after service of said notice, where the default can be cured by the payment of money; Cure the breach or default within thirty (30) days after service of said notice where the breach or default can be cured by something other than the payment of money and can be cured within that time; or Cure the breach or default in such reasonable time as may be required where something other than payment of money is required to cure the breach or default and cannot be performed within thirty (30) days after said notice, provided that acts to cure the breach or default are commenced within a thirty (30) day period after service of said notice of default on Lender by City and are thereafter diligently continued by Lender. Page 153 -22- H748-028 -- 4210543.1 Action by Lender. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, a Lender may forestall any action by City for a breach or default under the terms of this Agreement by Developer by commencing proceedings to foreclose its encumbrance or lien on the Project. The proceedings so commenced may be for foreclosure of the encumbrance by order of court or for foreclosure of the encumbrance under a power of sale contained in the instrument creating the encumbrance or lien. The proceedings shall not, however, forestall any such action by the City for the default or breach by Developer unless: They are commenced within thirty (30) days after service on Developer (and on Lender if Lender’s address is provided to the City) of the notice described hereinabove; They are, after having been commenced, diligently pursued in the manner required by law to completion; and Lender keeps and performs all of the terms, covenants, and conditions of this Agreement requiring the payment or expenditure of money by Developer until the foreclosure proceedings are complete or are discharged by redemption, satisfaction, or payment. Notice. Any notice required to be given by the terms of this Agreement shall be provided by email or certified mail, return receipt requested, at the address of the respective parties as specified below or at any other such address as may be later specified by the parties hereto. To Developer: Speedway Commerce Center Development, LLC A Delaware limited liability company 901 Via Piemonte, Suite 175 Ontario, CA 91764 Attention: Scott Morse With a copy to: Gresham Savage Nolan & Tilden, PC 550 E. Hospitality Lane, Suite 300 San Bernardino, CA 92408 Attention: Mark A. Ostoich Email: mark.ostoich@greshamsavage.com To City: City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California, 91730 Attention: City Manager Email: john.gillison@cityofrc.us With a Copy to: Richards, Watson & Gershon 350 S. Grand Avenue, 37th Floor Los Angeles, California 90071 Attention: Nicholas R. Ghirelli Email: nghirelli@rwglaw.com Page 154 -23- H748-028 -- 4210543.1 Attorneys’ Fees. In any proceedings arising from the enforcement of this Agreement or because of an alleged breach or default hereunder, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its costs and reasonable attorneys’ fees and experts’ fees incurred during the proceeding (including appeals) as may be fixed within the discretion of the court. Binding Effect. This Agreement shall bind, and the benefits and burdens hereof shall inure to, the respective parties hereto and their legal representatives, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, wherever the context requires or admits. Termination. Notwithstanding any other provision contained herein, this Agreement may be terminated at any time upon the written mutual agreement of both parties. Applicable Law and Venue. This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with and governed by the laws of the State of California. Venue for any action or litigation brought for breach or to enforce any provision of this Agreement shall be the Superior Court of the County of San Bernardino, California. Partial Invalidity. If any provisions of this Agreement shall be deemed to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable, the validity, legality, or enforceability of the remaining provisions hereof shall not in any way be affected or impaired thereby. Recordation. The City Clerk shall record this Agreement in the Official Records of the County Recorder of the County of San Bernardino within ten (10) business days following the Effective Date. Upon the expiration of the terms of this Agreement and the request of the Property Owner, the City will execute and deliver, in recordable form, an instrument confirming that this Agreement is terminated and of no further force or effect. Force Majeure. In the event that either party hereto shall be delayed or hindered or prevented from performance of any act required hereunder by reason of acts of God, strikes, lockouts, labor troubles, inability to procure materials, riots, insurrection, terrorism, war or other reason of similar nature not the fault of the party delayed in performing the work or doing the acts required under the terms of this Agreement, then the performance of such act shall be excused for the period of the delay caused by the foregoing. Financial inability shall not be deemed an excuse for delay under this section 31. Integrated Agreement. This Development Agreement consists of this Agreement together with all Exhibits attached hereto, and all of the same are hereby incorporated by reference. The provisions of this Agreement shall govern over any inconsistent or conflicting provisions set forth in the Exhibits. No representation or promise, verbal or written, not expressly set forth herein shall be binding or have any force or effect. Time of Essence. Time is of the essence in every provision hereof in which time is a factor. Operating Memoranda. The provisions of this Agreement require a close degree of cooperation between the City and Developer. The anticipated refinements to the Project may demonstrate that clarifications to this Agreement and the Project Entitlements are appropriate with respect to the implementation of this Agreement and the Project Entitlements. If, when, and as it becomes necessary or appropriate to take implementing Page 155 -24- H748-028 -- 4210543.1 actions or make such changes, adjustments or clarifications, the Parties may effectuate such actions, changes, adjustments or clarifications through an operating memorandum (“Operating Memorandum”) approved by the parties in writing which references this section. Such Operating Memorandum shall not require public notices and hearings or an amendment to this Agreement unless it is required by sections 15 or 16 above. The City Manager shall be authorized, after consultation with and approval of Developer, to determine whether a requested adjustment, clarification or implementing action (i) may be effectuated pursuant to this section 34 and is consistent with the intent and purpose of this Agreement and the Project Entitlements or (ii) is of the type that would constitute an amendment to this Agreement and thus would require compliance with the provisions of section 15 or section 16 above. The authority to enter into such Operating Memorandum is hereby delegated to the City Manager, and the City Manager is hereby authorized to execute any Operating Memorandum hereunder without further City Council action. [SIGNATURES ON NEXT PAGE] Page 156 -25- H748-028 -- 4210543.1 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been executed by the parties and shall be effective on the Effective Date set forth hereinabove. CITY: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a Municipal Corporation Dated: By: L. Dennis Michael Mayor DEVELOPER: SPEEDWAY COMMERCE CENTER DEVELOPMENT, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company Dated: By: Print Name: Title: ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds City Clerk Dated: By: Print Name: Title: Approved as to form: James L. Markman City Attorney Page 157 -26- H748-028 -- 4210543.1 A Notary Public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document. State of California ) County of San Bernardino ) On _________________________, before me, , (insert name and title of the officer) Notary Public, personally appeared , who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature (Seal) Page 158 -27- H748-028 -- 4210543.1 A Notary Public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document. State of California ) County of San Bernardino ) On _________________________, before me, , (insert name and title of the officer) Notary Public, personally appeared , who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature (Seal) Page 159 Page 160 A-1 11231-0001\2182311v1.doc H748-028 -- 4210543.1 EXHIBIT “A-1” LEGAL DESCRIPTION The Land referred to herein below is situated partly in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, and partly in an unincorporated area in the County of San Bernardino, all in the State of California, and is described as follows: ALL THOSE PORTIONS OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LAND LYING WITHIN THOSE CERTAIN PARCELS OF LAND GRANTED TO KAISER STEEL LAND DEVELOPMENT, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION, AND DESCRIBED AS PARCELS NO. 1, 2, 3, AND 4, AND A PORTION PARCEL NO. 6, BY DOCUMENT RECORDED JULY 28, 1994 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 94323332 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, IN THE WEST ONE-HALF OF SECTION 9 AND SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 6 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, AND THAT PORTION OF THE EAST ONE-HALF OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 6 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 9, SAID CORNER BEING LOCATED IN THE CENTER LINE OF ETIWANDA AVENUE; THENCE NORTH 00°06'43" EAST, 368.12 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 9 AND THE CENTERLINE OF SAID ETIWANDA AVENUE TO THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF THE ATCHISON TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY, 100 FEET IN WIDTH; THENCE NORTH 87°54'59" EAST, 50.04 FEET ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE TO THE EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SAID ETIWANDA AVENUE (50.00 HALF WIDTH) TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 87°54'59" EAST, 911.48 FEET ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE TO AN ANGLE POINT IN THE NORTHWESTERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF THE REAL PROPERTY CONVEYED TO NATIONAL CAN CORPORATION BY DEED RECORDED MAY 06, 1965 IN BOOK 6385, PAGE 456 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE SOUTH 60°06'26" WEST, 214.28 FEET ALONG SAID NORTHWESTERLY BOUNDARY TO A ANGLE POINT IN SAID BOUNDARY; THENCE SOUTH 00°07'03" WEST, 554.86 FEET ALONG THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID NATIONAL CAN CORPORATION BOUNDARY TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID BOUNDARY; THENCE NORTH 88°57'35" EAST, 1324.24 FEET ALONG THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID NATIONAL CAN CORPORATION BOUNDARY TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID BOUNDARY; THENCE NORTH 00°07'03" EAST, 679.03 FEET ALONG THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID NATIONAL CAN CORPORATION BOUNDARY TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID BOUNDARY, SAID NORTHEAST CORNER ALSO BEING ON SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF THE ATCHISON TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY; THENCE NORTH 87°54'59" EAST, 447.68 FEET ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE TO A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT WESTERLY 100.00 FEET FROM THE SOUTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 9; THENCE SOUTH 00°15'05" WEST, 414.32 FEET ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE, TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 9 SAID POINT ALSO BEING ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF Page 161 A-2- 11231-0001\2182311v1.doc H748-028 -- 4210543.1 SAID SECTION 16; THENCE NORTH 88°57'18" EAST, 100.02 FEET ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE, TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST ONE- QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 16; THENCE NORTH 88°57'18" EAST, 200.03 FEET ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE NORTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 16 TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE WESTERLY 200.00 FEET OF THE EAST ONE-HALF OF SAID SECTION 16; THENCE SOUTH 00°06'58" WEST, 799.51 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF NAPA STREET AS DESCRIBED IN DOCUMENT RECORDED OCTOBER 06, 1995 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 19950348166, AND DOCUMENT RECORDED NOVEMBER 22, 1995 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 19950404553, BOTH OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, SAID POINT ALSO BEING THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 883.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH THE BEGINNING OF SAID NON-TANGENT CURVE BEARS NORTH 23°08'53" WEST; THENCE FOLLOWING (7) SEVEN COURSES ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID NAPA STREET: THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY 36.49 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 02°22'05", TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 817.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH THE BEGINNING OF SAID REVERSE CURVE BEARS SOUTH 25°30'58" EAST; THENCE WESTERLY 729.50 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 51°09'34" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 883.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH THE BEGINNING OF SAID REVERSE CURVE BEARS NORTH 25°38'36" EAST; THENCE WESTERLY 390.98 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 25°22'10"; THENCE NORTH 89°43'34" WEST, 518.43 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 1033.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY 188.14 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 10°26'06" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 967.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH THE BEGINNING OF SAID REVERSE CURVE BEARS SOUTH 10°09'40" EAST; THENCE WESTERLY 176.47 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 10°27'22"; THENCE NORTH 89°42'18" WEST, 222.48 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF THAT CERTAIN STRIP OF LAND, 150.00 FEET WIDE, DESCRIBED IN THE RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT FROM FRANK BORGIA ET UX. TO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY LTD., RECORDED SEPTEMBER 27, 1938 IN BOOK 1301, PAGE 183 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE NORTH 00°07'03" EAST, 714.03 FEET ALONG SAID EAST LINE TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 9; THENCE NORTH 00°04'52" EAST, 319.38 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF PARCEL NO. 1 AS CONVEYED TO ROBERT C. RINGHOLZ BY DEED RECORDED NOVEMBER 30, 1948 IN BOOK 2327, PAGE 359 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, SAID POINT BEARS 625.52 FEET (625.56 FEET GROUND) EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE FROM THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF PARCEL NO. 1 OF SAID ROBERT C. RINGHOLZ PROPERTY, SAID SOUTHWEST CORNER BEING ON THE CENTERLINE OF SAID ETIWANDA AVENUE; THENCE SOUTH 87°54'59" WEST, 575.48 FEET ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE TO THE INTERSECTION OF SAID EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SAID ETIWANDA AVENUE; THENCE NORTH 00°06'43" EAST, 60.04 FEET ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Page 162 A-3- 11231-0001\2182311v1.doc H748-028 -- 4210543.1 EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEING A PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST ONE-HALF OF SECTION 9 AND A PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 6 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, SITUATED IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, SAID PORTION ALSO BEING A PORTION OF THE LAND DESCRIBED IN GRANT DEED TO KAISER STEEL LAND DEVELOPMENT, INC., RECORDED JANUARY 12, 2000 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 20000011988 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 9, SAID CORNER BEING ON THE CENTERLINE OF ETIWANDA AVENUE; THENCE NORTH 00°06'43" EAST, 368.09 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 9 AND SAID CENTERLINE TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE ATCHISON TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY (100 FEET WIDE); THENCE NORTH 87°54'59" EAST 50.04 FEET ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID ETIWANDA AVENUE (50.00 FEET HALF WIDTH), SAID POINT BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 87°54'59" EAST, 911.48 FEET CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE TO AN ANGLE POINT IN THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF THE PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN GRANT DEED TO NATIONAL CAN CORPORATION, RECORDED MAY 06, 1965 IN BOOK 6385, PAGE 456 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS; THENCE SOUTH 60°06'26" WEST 214.28 FEET ALONG SAID NORTHWESTERLY LINE TO AN ANGLE POINT IN SAID PARCEL; THENCE SOUTH 00°07'03" WEST, 554.86 FEET ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL; THENCE SOUTH 88°57'35" WEST, 150.02 FEET ALONG THE WESTERLY PROJECTION OF THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY LINE OF THAT CERTAIN STRIP OF LAND, 150 FEET WIDE, DESCRIBED IN RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT, TO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY, LTD., RECORDED SEPTEMBER 27, 1938 IN BOOK 1301, PAGE 183 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE NORTH 00°07'03" EAST, 272.73 FEET ALONG LAST SAID EASTERLY LINE TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 9; THENCE NORTH 00°04'52" EAST, 319.38 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE LAND DESCRIBED AS PARCEL NO. 1 IN GRANT DEED TO ROBERT C. RINGHOLZ, RECORDED NOVEMBER 30, 1948 IN BOOK 2327, PAGE 359 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, SAID POINT BEARS 625.52 FEET (625.56 FEET GROUND) EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE FROM THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 1 OF SAID ROBERT C. RINGHOLZ PROPERTY, SAID SOUTHWEST CORNER BEING ON THE CENTERLINE OF ETIWANDA AVENUE; THENCE SOUTH 87°54'59" WEST, 575.48 FEET ALONG LAST SAID SOUTHERLY LINE TO A POINT ON SAID EASTERLY LINE OF ETIWANDA AVENUE; THENCE NORTH 00°06'43" EAST, 60.04 FEET ALONG LAST SAID EASTERLY LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEING A PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 9 AND A PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 6 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, SITUATED IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, SAID PORTION ALSO BEING A PORTION OF THE PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN GRANT DEED TO NATIONAL CAN CORPORATION, RECORDED MAY 06, 1965 IN BOOK 6385, Page 163 A-4- 11231-0001\2182311v1.doc H748-028 -- 4210543.1 PAGE 456 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID NATIONAL CAN CORPORATION PARCEL; THENCE SOUTH 88°57'35" WEST, 567.50 FEET ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL TO A POINT ON A NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 1062.15 FEET, A RADIAL BEARING TO SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 72°53'33" WEST; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 48°02'18" AN ARC LENGTH OF 890.54 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL; THENCE SOUTH 00°07'03" WEST, 641.03 FEET ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID LAND IS ALSO SHOWN AND DESCRIBED AS PARCEL 2 OF CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE NO. 507 RECORDED JANUARY 17, 2002 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 20020026839 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. For conveyancing purposes only: APNs 0229-291-45-0-000, 0229-291-46-0-000 and 0229-291-54-0-000. Page 164 A-2-1 11231-0001\2182311v1.doc H748-028 -- 4210543.1 EXHIBIT “A-2” SITE MAP Page 165 Page 166 B-1 11231-0001\2182311v1.doc H748-028 -- 4210543.1 EXHIBIT “B” FAIR SHARE FEES Page 167 Page 168 C-1 11231-0001\2182311v1.doc H748-028 -- 4210543.1 EXHIBIT “C” DEVELOPMENT PLAN ON FILE IN THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT; TO BE ADDED PRIOR TO RECORDING Page 169 Page 170 E-1 11231-0001\2182311v1.doc H748-028 -- 4210543.1 EXHIBIT “D” New Public Street Depiction Via Maris Place, AKA Street “A” Page 171 Page 172 E-1 11231-0001\2182311v1.doc H748-028 -- 4210543.1 EXHIBIT “E” Draft Power Purchase Agreement INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICT RENEWABLE POWER PURCHASE AGREEMENT between CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA and ________ Page 173 INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICT RENEWABLE POWER PURCHASE AGREEMENT TABLE OF CONTENT 1. DOCUMENTS INCLUDED ......................................................................................... 3 2. SELLER’S FACILITY AND COMMERCIAL OPERATION DATE .................... 3 3. CONTRACT CAPACITY AND QUANTITY; TERM; CONTRACT PRICE; BILLING; COLLATERAL REQUIREMENT .......................................................... 6 4. GREEN ATTRIBUTES; RESOURCE ADEQUACY BENEFITS; ERR REQUIREMENTS ...................................................................................................... 10 5. REPRESENTATION AND WARRANTIES; COVENANTS ................................. 11 6. GENERAL CONDITIONS ......................................................................................... 13 7. INDEMNITY ............................................................................................................... 16 8. LIMITATION OF DAMAGES .................................................................................. 17 9. INSURANCE ............................................................................................................... 17 10. NOTICES ..................................................................................................................... 21 11. FORCE MAJEURE .................................................................................................... 21 12. EVENTS OF DEFAULT AND TERMINATION .................................................... 22 13. GOVERNMENTAL CHARGES ............................................................................... 25 14. RELEASE OF INFORMATION AND RECORDING CONVERSATION .......... 25 15. ASSIGNMENT ............................................................................................................ 26 16. GOVERNING LAW .................................................................................................... 26 17. DISPUTE RESOLUTION .......................................................................................... 26 18. MISCELLANEOUS .................................................................................................... 27 APPENDIX A – DEFINITIONS .............................................................................................................. 30 APPENDIX B – COMMERCIAL OPERATION DATE CONFIRMATION LETTER ................... 40 APPENDIX C – FORECASTING REQUIREMENTS ......................................................................... 41 APPENDIX D – DESCRIPTION OF THE FACILITY ........................................................................ 42 APPENDIX E – INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICT RENEWABLE PPA MILESTONES AND EXAMPLE ACTION STEPS ..................................................................................... 43 APPENDIX F – NOTICES LIST ............................................................................................................ 45 APPENDIX G – FORM OF LETTER OF CREDIT ............................................................................. 47 APPENDIX H – FORM OF CONSENT TO ASSIGNMENT .............................................................. 50 Page 174 E-3 11231-0001\2182311v1.doc H748-028 -- 4210543.1 The City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of California (“Buyer” or “RCMU”), and _________(“Seller”), a ________________, hereby enter into this Power Purchase Agreement (“Agreement”) made and effective as of the Execution Date. Seller and Buyer are sometimes referred to in this Agreement jointly as “Parties” or individually as “Party.” In consideration of the mutual promises and obligations stated in this Agreement and its appendices, the Parties agree as follows: ARTICLE ONE. DOCUMENTS INCLUDED This Agreement includes the following appendices, which are specifically incorporated herein and made a part of this Agreement: Appendix A Definitions Appendix B Commercial Operation Date Confirmation Letter Appendix C Forecasting Requirements Appendix D Description of the Facility Appendix E Seller’s Milestone Schedule Appendix F Notices List Appendix G Form of Letter of Credit Appendix H Form of Consent to Assignment This Agreement specifically incorporates herein by reference as if appended hereto the following documents (collectively referred to herein as the “Referenced Documents”): Industrial Zoning District Renewable PPA Application, submitted by Seller, dated __________ Industrial Zoning District Renewable PPA Generation Forecast, dated _____________ Project Phasing Plan, approved by the City of Rancho Cucamonga on _____________ To the extent any provisions of the Referenced Documents conflict with any other provisions of the Agreement, the other provisions of the Agreement shall control. ARTICLE TWO. SELLER’S FACILITY AND COMMERCIAL OPERATION DATE This Agreement governs Buyer’s purchase of the Product from the electrical generating facility (hereinafter referred to as the “Facility” or “Project”) as described in this Section. 1.1. Facility Location. The Facility is physically located at: _____________________________. Page 175 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2021-00175 – CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA January 5, 2022 Page 4 1.2. Facility Name. The Facility is named _____________. 1.2.1. The Facility’s renewable resource is _______. 1.3. Interconnection Point. The Facility is connected to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility (RCMU’s) electric system at __________ distribution circuit at a service voltage of __12____ kV. 1.4. Delivery Point. The Delivery Point for Energy is the Interconnection Point. 1.5. Facility Description. A description of the Facility, including a summary of its significant components, a drawing showing the general arrangements of the Facility, and a single line diagram illustrating the interconnection of the Facility and loads with the Transmission/Distribution Owner’s electric distribution system, is attached and incorporated herein as Appendix D. 1.6. Commercial Operation. 1.6.1. The Facility’s expected Commercial Operation Date is _______. 1.6.2. Seller shall achieve Commercial Operation no later than the expected Commercial Operation Date specified in Section 2.6.1, which date shall be no later than _______ (__) months from the Execution Date of this Agreement. The expected Commercial Operation Date specified in Section 2.6.1 may be extended for only the following reasons: 1.6.2.1. If Seller has taken all commercially reasonable actions (including but not limited to Seller’s timely filing of all required applications and documents, payment of all applicable fees, and completion of all electric system upgrades needed, if any) to have the Project physically interconnected to the Transmission/Distribution Owner’s distribution system, but fails to secure any necessary commitments from the Transmission/Distribution Owner for such interconnection and upgrades due to delays beyond Seller’s reasonable control, then the expected Commercial Operation Date specified in Section 2.6.1 shall be extended for the number of days necessary to physically interconnect the Facility; provided, however, that such delay may not extend the expected Commercial Operation Date specified in Section 2.6.1 for a period of more than six (6) months; or 1.6.2.2. If Seller has taken all commercially reasonable actions (including but not limited to Seller’s timely filing of all required applications and documents and payment of all applicable fees, if any) to obtain permits necessary to construct and operate the facility but fails to secure any such permits due to delays beyond Seller’s reasonable control, then the expected Commercial Operation Date specified in Section 2.6.1 shall be extended for the number Page 176 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2021-00175 – CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA January 5, 2022 Page 5 of days necessary to secure such permits; provided, however, that such delay may not extend the expected Commercial Operation Date specified in Section 2.6.1 for a period of more than six (6) months; or 1.6.2.3. In the event of Force Majeure, the expected Commercial Operation Date specified in Section 2.6.1 shall be extended on a day-to-day basis for a cumulative period of not more than six (6) months; provided that Seller complies with Section 10. 1.6.2.4. Extensions under Section 2.6.2.1, 2.6.2.2, and 2.6.2.3, to the extent they may occur concurrently, shall run concurrently. 1.6.3. Seller shall provide Notice to Buyer of the Commercial Operation Date of the Facility at least thirty (30) days prior to such date. 1.6.4. Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement, if Seller is unable to achieve Commercial Operation by the expected Commercial Operation Date specified in Section 2.6.1, which may be extended pursuant to Section 2.6.2, then Seller shall either (i) terminate the Agreement, in which case Buyer may retain the full Reservation Deposit, or (ii) pay to Buyer daily delay damages in the amount of twenty cents ($0.20) for each kilowatt of Contract Capacity for each day beyond the expected Commercial Operation Date specified in Section 2.6.1, as may be extended pursuant to Section 2.6.2, that Seller requires to achieve Commercial Operation. 1.6.5. Commercial Operation shall occur only when all of the following conditions have been satisfied: 1.6.5.1. the Facility’s status as an Eligible Renewable Energy Resource is demonstrated by Seller’s receipt of pre-certification from the CEC; 1.6.5.2. the Parties have executed and exchanged the “Commercial Operation Date Confirmation Letter” attached as Appendix B; 1.6.5.3. Seller is in compliance with all applicable requirements of the RCMU Electric Service Rule 22 – Generating Facility Interconnections; 1.6.5.4. Seller has furnished to Buyer all insurance documents required under Section 9; 1.6.5.5. Seller has provided thirty (30) days’ Notice prior to the Commercial Operation Date as required under Section 2.6.3; 1.6.5.6. Seller has obtained all permits necessary to operate the Facility and is in compliance with all Laws applicable to the operation of the Facility; Page 177 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2021-00175 – CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA January 5, 2022 Page 6 1.6.5.7. Seller has successfully installed and tested the Facility at its full Contract Capacity, and the Facility is capable of reliably generating at its full Contract Capacity; and 1.6.5.8. Seller has satisfied the Collateral Requirement set forth in Section 3.9. 1.6.5.9. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has approved the Phasing Plan submitted by Seller for the Facility. ARTICLE THREE. CONTRACT CAPACITY AND QUANTITY; TERM; CONTRACT PRICE; BILLING; COLLATERAL REQUIREMENT 1.7. Contract Capacity. Pursuant to the Phasing Plan approved by the City of Rancho Cucamonga, the Contract Capacity is as follows: Phase 1: _____ kW, alternating current (AC). Phase 2: _____ kW, alternating current (AC). Phase 3: _____ kW, alternating current (AC). 1.8. Contract Quantity. 1.8.1. The “Contract Quantity” during each Contract Year is the amount set forth in the applicable Contract Year in the “Delivery Term Contract Quantity Schedule,” set forth in Appendix F , which amount is net of Station Use. Seller shall have the option to update the Delivery Term Contract Quantity Schedule one (1) time prior to Commercial Operation Date by an amount not to exceed a five percent (5%) increase or decrease from the Contract Quantity specified as of the Execution Date. 1.8.2. At least ninety (90) days prior to the occurrence of a Phasing Plan Transition Event, Seller shall provide Notice to Buyer that includes the following information (i) the new Contract Capacity consistent with Section 3.1; (ii) the date upon which the changed Contract Capacity will be available to Buyer; and (iii) documentation reasonably satisfactory to Buyer demonstrating that the requirements of the Phasing Plan have been met. 1.8.3. Within thirty (30) days of receiving Notice from Seller pursuant to Section 3.2.2., the City Manager shall cause the Contract Quantity values specified in Appendix F to be modified for the applicable Contract Years consistent with the Phasing Plan, and such modification shall be considered an element of the administration of this Agreement and shall not require the consent of the Parties hereto. Upon such modification, the City Manager shall promptly provide a copy of such revised Appendix F to Seller. Page 178 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2021-00175 – CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA January 5, 2022 Page 7 1.9. Transaction. During the Delivery Term, Seller shall sell and deliver, or cause to be delivered, and Buyer shall purchase and receive, all Product produced by or associated with the Facility that is delivered to the Delivery Point. In no event shall Seller have the right to procure the Product from sources other than the Facility for sale or delivery to Buyer under this Agreement. Buyer shall have no obligation to receive or purchase the Product from Seller prior to the Commercial Operation Date or after the end of the Delivery Term. 1.10. Term of Agreement; Survival of Rights and Obligations. 1.10.1. The term shall commence upon the Execution Date of this Agreement and shall remain in effect until the conclusion of the Delivery Term unless terminated sooner pursuant to Sections 10.4 or 11 of this Agreement (the “Term”). 1.10.2. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Agreement, all of the rights and obligations that this Agreement expressly provides survive termination as well as the rights and obligations that arise from Seller’s or Buyer’s covenants, agreements, representations, and warranties applicable to, or to be performed, at or during any time before or as a result of the termination of this Agreement. 1.11. Delivery Term. Seller shall deliver the Product from the Facility to Buyer for a period of twenty-five (25) Contract Years for all generation technologies. The Delivery Term shall commence on the Commercial Operation Date and continue until the end of the last Contract Year unless the Agreement is terminated sooner pursuant to the terms of the Agreement. 1.12. Contract Price. 1.12.1. Throughout the Delivery Term, and subject to and in accordance with the terms of this Agreement, Buyer shall pay the Contract Price to Seller for the Product based on the amount of Delivered Energy. The Contract Price shall be $__ per MWh of Delivered Energy. 1.12.2. In any Contract Year, if the amount of Delivered Energy exceeds one hundred fifteen percent (115%) of the annual Contract Quantity amount, the Contract Price for such Delivered Energy in excess of one hundred fifteen percent (115%) shall be adjusted to be seventy-five percent (75%) of the applicable Contract Price. 1.12.3. Seller shall curtail production of the Facility in accordance with the applicable Notice after receipt of: (a) Notice from Buyer that Buyer has been instructed by the CAISO or the Transmission/Distribution Owner or any other jurisdictional entity to curtail Energy deliveries; or (b) Notice that Seller has been given a curtailment order or similar instruction in order to respond to an Emergency; or (c) Notice of a Curtailment Order issued by Buyer. Buyer shall have no obligation to pay Seller for Page 179 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2021-00175 – CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA January 5, 2022 Page 8 any Product delivered in violation of this Section 3.6.3. Seller shall assume all liability and reimburse Buyer for any and all costs and charges incurred by Buyer, including but not limited to CAISO penalties, as a result of Seller delivering Energy in violation of the Section 3.6.3. Buyer shall have no obligation to pay Seller for any Product that Seller would have been able to deliver but for the fact of a curtailment pursuant to subsection (a) or (b) of the first sentence of this Section 3.6.3. 1.12.4. Buyer shall have the right, but not the obligation, to issue to Seller a Curtailment Order. Buyer shall pay Seller the Contract Price for the Product Seller would have been able to deliver but for the fact that Buyer issued a Curtailment Order (“Paid Curtailed Product”) as calculated pursuant to Section 3.6.5. 1.12.5. No later than fifteen (15) days after the end of a calendar month in which Buyer issued a Curtailment Order, Seller shall prepare and provide to Buyer a calculation of the amount of Product the Facility would have been able to deliver under Sections 3.6.4 for the applicable month. Seller shall apply accepted industry standards in making such calculation and take into consideration past performance of the Facility, and other relevant information, including but not limited to, Facility availability, weather, water flow, and solar irradiance data for the period of time during the Buyer issued Curtailment Order. Upon Buyer’s request, Seller shall promptly provide to Buyer any additional and supporting documentation necessary for Buyer to audit and verify Seller’s calculation. 1.13. Billing. 1.13.1. The amount of Delivered Energy shall be determined by the meter specified in Section 6.2.1 or Check Meter, as applicable. Buyer has no obligation to purchase from Seller any Energy that is not or cannot be delivered to the Delivery Point, regardless of circumstance. Buyer will not be obligated to pay Seller for any Product that Seller delivers in violation of Section 3.6.3, including any Product Seller delivers in excess of the amount specified in any Curtailment Order. 1.13.2. For the purpose of calculating monthly payments under this Agreement, the amount recorded by the meter specified in Section 6.2.1 or Check Meter, as applicable, will be multiplied by the Contract Price noted in Section 3.6.1, as possibly adjusted under Section 3.6.2, less any Energy produced by the Facility for which Buyer is not obligated to pay Seller as set forth in Section 3.7.1. 1.13.3. On or before the last Business Day of the month immediately following each calendar month, Seller shall determine the amount of Delivered Energy received by Buyer pursuant to this Agreement for each monthly period and issue an invoice showing the calculation of the payment. Seller shall also provide to Buyer: (a) records of metered data sufficient to document and verify the generation of Page 180 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2021-00175 – CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA January 5, 2022 Page 9 Delivered Energy by the Facility during the preceding month; (b) access to any records; and (c) an invoice, in the format specified by Buyer. 1.13.4. In the event an invoice or portion thereof or any other claim or adjustment arising hereunder, is disputed, payment of the undisputed portion of the invoice shall be required to be made when due, with Notice of the objection given to the other Party. Any invoice dispute or invoice adjustment shall be in writing and shall state the basis for the dispute or adjustment. Payment of the disputed amount shall not be required until the dispute is resolved. In the event adjustments to payments are required as a result of inaccurate meter(s), Buyer in its reasonable discretion shall determine the correct amount of Delivered Energy received under this Agreement during any period of inaccuracy and recompute the amount due from Buyer to Seller for the Delivered Energy delivered during the period of inaccuracy. The Parties agree to use good faith efforts to resolve the dispute or identify the adjustment as soon as possible. Upon resolution of the dispute or calculation of the adjustment, any required payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of such resolution. 1.13.5. All interest paid or payable under this Agreement shall be computed as simple interest using the Interest Rate and, unless specified otherwise in this Agreement, shall be paid concurrently with the payment or refund of the underlying amount on which such interest is payable. 1.14. Title and Risk of Loss. Title to and risk of loss related to the Energy from the Facility shall transfer from Seller to Buyer at the Delivery Point. Seller warrants that it will deliver to Buyer the Product from the Facility free and clear of all liens, security interests, claims, and encumbrances or any interest therein or thereto by any person. 1.15. Collateral Requirement. On or before the Commercial Operation Date, Seller shall post and thereafter maintain a collateral requirement equal to sixty dollars ($60.00) for each kilowatt of Contract Capacity (the “Collateral Requirement”). The Collateral Requirement will be held by Buyer and must be in the form of either cash deposit or Letter of Credit. The Collateral Requirement shall be posted to Buyer and maintained at all times during the Delivery Term. Buyer shall be entitled to draw upon the Collateral Requirement for any damages arising upon Buyer’s declaration of an Early Termination Date as set forth in Section 12.3. In the event that Buyer draws on the Collateral Requirement, Seller shall promptly replenish such Collateral Requirement to the amount specified in this Section 3.9. Buyer shall return the unused portion of the Collateral Requirement to Seller promptly at the end of the Delivery Term, once all payment obligations of the Seller under this Agreement have been satisfied. Buyer shall pay simple interest on cash held to satisfy the Collateral Requirements at the rate and in the manner set forth in Section 3.7.5. Page 181 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2021-00175 – CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA January 5, 2022 Page 10 ARTICLE FOUR. GREEN ATTRIBUTES; RESOURCE ADEQUACY BENEFITS; ERR REQUIREMENTS 1.16. Green Attributes. Seller hereby provides and conveys all green attributes associated with all electricity generation from the project to buyer as part of the product being delivered. seller represents and warrants that seller holds the rights to all green attributes from the project, and seller agrees to convey and hereby conveys all such green attributes to buyer as included in the delivery of the product from the project. 1.17. Conveyance of Product. Throughout the Delivery Term, Seller shall provide and convey the Product to Buyer in accordance with the terms of this Agreement, and Buyer shall have the exclusive right to the Product. Seller shall, at its own cost, take all actions and execute all documents or instruments that are reasonable and necessary to effectuate the use of the Green Attributes, Resource Adequacy Benefits, if any, and Capacity Attributes, if any, for Buyer’s benefit throughout the Delivery Term. 1.18. WREGIS. Seller shall cause and allow Buyer, or Buyer’s agent, to be the “Qualified Reporting Entity” and “Account Holder” (as such terms are defined by WREGIS) for the Facility within thirty (30) days after the Commercial Operation Date. In the event that Buyer is not the Qualified Reporting Entity, Seller shall, at its sole expense, take all actions necessary and provide any documentation requested by Buyer in support of WREGIS account administration and compliance with the California Renewables Portfolio Standard. Seller, at its sole expense, shall take all necessary steps and submit/file all necessary documentation to ensure that the Facility remains an Eligible Renewable Energy Resource throughout the Delivery Term as outlined in Section 4.5 and that all WREGIS Certificates associated with the Product accrue to Buyer and will satisfy the requirements of the California Renewables Portfolio Standard. 1.19. Resource Adequacy Benefits. 1.19.1. During the Delivery Term, Seller grants, pledges, assigns and otherwise commits to Buyer all of the Contract Capacity, including Capacity Attributes, if any, from the Project to enable Buyer to meet its Resource Adequacy or successor program requirements, as the CAISO or other regional entity may prescribe (“Resource Adequacy Requirements”). 1.19.2. Seller shall cooperate in good faith with and comply with reasonable requests of Buyer to enable Buyer to maximize anyResource Adequacy Benefits attributable to the Facility or any credits that reduce the Resource Adequacy Requirements of the Buyer. 1.20. Eligible Renewable Energy Resource. Seller shall take all actions necessary to achieve and maintain status as an Eligible Renewable Energy Resource (“ERR”) throughout the Delivery Term. Within thirty (30) days after the Commercial Operation Date, Seller shall file an application or other appropriate request with the CEC for CEC Page 182 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2021-00175 – CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA January 5, 2022 Page 11 Certification for the Facility. Seller shall expeditiously seek CEC Certification, including promptly responding to any requests for information from the requesting authority. ARTICLE FIVE. REPRESENTATION AND WARRANTIES; COVENANTS 1.21. Representations and Warranties. On the Execution Date, each Party represents and warrants to the other Party that: 1.21.1. it is duly organized, validly existing and in good standing under the Laws of the jurisdiction of its formation; 1.21.2. the execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement are within its powers, have been duly authorized by all necessary action and do not violate any of the terms and conditions in its governing documents, any contracts to which it is a party or any Laws; 1.21.3. this Agreement and each other document executed and delivered in accordance with this Agreement constitutes a legally valid and binding obligation enforceable against it in accordance with its terms; 1.21.4. it is not Bankrupt and there are no proceedings pending or being contemplated by it or, to its knowledge, threatened against it which would result in it being or becoming Bankrupt; and 1.21.5. there is not pending or, to its knowledge, threatened against it or any of its Affiliates any legal proceedings that could materially adversely affect its ability to perform its obligations under this Agreement. 1.22. General Covenants. Each Party covenants that throughout the Term of this Agreement: 1.22.1. it shall continue to be duly organized, validly existing and in good standing under the Laws of the jurisdiction of its formation; 1.22.2. it shall maintain (or obtain from time to time as required, including through renewal, as applicable) all regulatory authorizations necessary for it to legally perform its obligations under this Agreement; and 1.22.3. it shall perform its obligations under this Agreement in a manner that does not violate any of the terms and conditions in its governing documents, any contracts to which it is a party, or any Law. 1.23. Seller’s Representations, Warranties and Covenants. In addition to the representations, warranties and covenants specified in Sections 5.1 and 5.2, Seller Page 183 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2021-00175 – CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA January 5, 2022 Page 12 makes the following additional representations, warranties and covenants to Buyer, as of the Execution Date: 1.23.1. Seller has met all applicable legal and regulatory requirements to sell wholesale electricity in California; 1.23.2. Seller, and, if applicable, its successors, represents and warrants that throughout the Delivery Term of this Agreement that: (i) the Project qualifies and is certified by the CEC as an ERR as such term is defined in Public Utilities Code Section 399.12 or Section 399.16; and (ii) the Project’s output delivered to Buyer qualifies under the requirements of the California Renewables Portfolio Standard. To the extent a change in law occurs after execution of this Agreement that causes this representation and warranty to be materially false or misleading, it shall not be an Event of Default if Seller has used commercially reasonable efforts to comply with such change in law; 1.23.3. Seller and, if applicable, its successors, represents and warrants that throughout the Delivery Term of this Agreement the Renewable Energy Credits transferred to Buyer conform to the definition and attributes required for compliance with the California Renewables Portfolio Standard, as set forth in the California Energy Commission’s Enforcement Procedures for the Renewables Portfolio Standard for Local Publicly Owned Electric Utilities adopted on December 22, 2020, and as may be modified by subsequent decision of the California Energy Commission or by subsequent legislation. To the extent a change in law occurs after execution of this Agreement that causes this representation and warranty to be materially false or misleading, it shall not be an Event of Default if Seller has used commercially reasonable efforts to comply with such change in law; 1.23.4. Throughout the Delivery Term, Seller shall: (a) own and operate the Facility; (b) deliver the Product to Buyer free and clear of all liens, security interests, claims, and encumbrances or any interest therein or thereto by any individual or entity; and (c) hold the rights to all of the Product; 1.23.5. Seller is acting for its own account, has made its own independent decision to enter into this Agreement and as to whether this Agreement is appropriate or proper for it based upon its own judgment, is not relying upon the advice or recommendations of the Buyer in so doing, and is capable of assessing the merits of, and understands and accepts, the terms, conditions and risks of this Agreement; 1.23.6. Throughout the Delivery Term: (a) Seller shall not convey, transfer, allocate, designate, award, report or otherwise provide any or all of the Product, or any portion thereof, or any benefits derived therefrom, to any party other than Buyer; and (b) Seller shall not start-up or operate the Facility per instruction of or for the benefit of any third party, except as required by other Laws; Page 184 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2021-00175 – CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA January 5, 2022 Page 13 1.23.7. The construction of the Facility shall comply with all Laws, including applicable state and local laws, building standards, and interconnection requirements; 1.23.8. No other person or entity, including any other generating facility, has any rights in connection with Seller’s Interconnection Agreement or Seller’s Interconnection Facilities and no other persons or entities shall have any such rights during the Term; 1.23.9. During the Delivery Term, Seller shall not allow any other person or entity, including any other generating facility, to use Seller’s Interconnection Facilities; and 1.23.10. All representations made by Seller in its Industrial Zoning District Renewable PPA Application are true and correct. 1.23.11. Pursuant to the requirements of Section 17.76.020 of Chapter 17.76 of (Alternative Energy Systems and Facilities) of Article IV (Site Development Provisions) of Title 17 (Development Code) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, the Contract Capacity, during the applicable phase, is sufficient to meet the annualized customer load. ARTICLE SIX. GENERAL CONDITIONS 1.24. Interconnection Requirements. During the Delivery Term, Seller shall comply with all contractual, metering, and applicable interconnection requirements, including those set forth in the RCMU Electric Service Rule 22,, Transmission/Distribution Owner’s applicable tariffs, the CAISO Tariff and implementing CAISO standards and requirements, and all Laws so as to be able to deliver Energy to the Delivery Point. Seller shall provide and maintain during the Delivery Term, at its cost, all data processing gateways or remote intelligence gateways, telemetering equipment and data acquisition services, and associated measuring and recording equipment necessary to meet all applicable WREGIS and RCMU requirements applicable to the Facility during the Delivery Term. 1.25. Metering Requirements. 1.25.1. All Energy from the Project must be delivered through a single revenue quality meter and that meter must be dedicated exclusively to the Project. All Delivered Energy purchased under this Agreement must be measured by the Project’s revenue quality meter(s) to be eligible for payment under this Agreement. Seller shall bear all costs relating to all metering equipment installed to accommodate the Project. 1.25.2. Buyer may, at its sole cost, furnish and install one Check Meter at the interconnection associated with the Facility at a location provided by Seller that is compliant with Buyer’s electric service requirements. The Check Meter may be interconnected with Buyer’s communication network, or the communication Page 185 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2021-00175 – CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA January 5, 2022 Page 14 network of Buyer’s Agent, to permit periodic, remote collection of revenue quality meter data. In the event that Buyer elects to install a Check Meter, Buyer may compare the Check Meter data to the Facility’s revenue meter data. If the deviation between the Facility’s revenue meter data and the Check Meter data for any comparison is greater than 0.3%, Buyer may provide Notice to Seller of such deviation and the Parties shall mutually arrange for a meter check or recertification of the Check Meter or the Facility’s revenue meter, as applicable. Each Party shall bear its own costs for any meter check or recertification. Testing procedures and standards for the Check Meter shall be the same as for a comparable Buyer-owned meter. Parties shall have the right to have representatives present during all such tests. The Check Meter, if Buyer elects to install a Check Meter, is intended to be used for back-up purposes in the event of a failure or other malfunction of the Facility’s revenue meter, and Check Meter data shall only be used to validate the Facility’s revenue meter data and, in the event of a failure or other malfunction of the Facility’s revenue meter, in place of the Facility’s revenue meter until such time that the Facility’s revenue meter is recertified. 1.26. Meter Data. Seller hereby agrees to provide all meter data to Buyer in a form acceptable to Buyer, including any inspection, testing and calibration data and reports. Seller shall grant Buyer and Buyer’s agent the right to retrieve the meter readings from Seller or Seller’s meter reading agent. 1.27. Standard of Care. Seller shall: (a) maintain and operate the Facility and Interconnection Facilities in conformance with RCMU Rule 22, all Laws, and Prudent Electrical Practices; (b) obtain any governmental authorizations and permits required for the construction and operation of the Facility and Interconnection Facilities; and (c) generate, schedule and perform transmission services in compliance with all applicable RCMU rulesand Prudent Electrical Practices. Seller shall reimburse Buyer for any and all losses, damages, claims, penalties, or liability Buyer incurs as a result of Seller’s failure to obtain or maintain any governmental authorizations and permits required for construction and operation of the Facility throughout the Term of this Agreement. 1.28. Access Rights. 1.28.1. Operations Logs. Seller shall maintain a complete and accurate log of all material operations and maintenance information on a daily basis. Such log shall include, but not be limited to, information on power production, fuel consumption (if applicable), efficiency, availability, maintenance performed, outages, results of inspections, manufacturer recommended services, replacements, electrical characteristics of the generators, control settings or adjustments of equipment and protective devices. Seller shall provide this information electronically to Buyer within twenty (20) days of Buyer’s request. Page 186 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2021-00175 – CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA January 5, 2022 Page 15 1.28.2. Access Rights. Buyer, its authorized agents, employees and inspectors may, on reasonable advance notice under the circumstances, visit the Project during normal business hours for purposes reasonably connected with this Agreement. Buyer, its authorized agents, employees and inspectors must (a) at all times adhere to all safety and security procedures as may be required by Seller; and (b) not interfere with the operation of the Project. Buyer shall make reasonable efforts to coordinate its emergency activities with the safety and security departments, if any, of the Project operator. Seller shall keep Buyer advised of current procedures for contacting the Project operator’s safety and security departments, if any exist. 1.29. Protection of Property. Seller shall be solely responsible for protecting its own facilities from possible damage resulting from electrical disturbances or faults caused by the operation, faulty operation, or non-operation of the Transmission/Distribution Owner's facilities. Buyer shall not be liable for any such damages so caused. 1.30. Forecasting. Seller shall comply with the forecasting in Appendix C. 1.31. Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Seller acknowledges that a Governmental Authority may require Buyer to take certain actions with respect to greenhouse gas emissions attributable to the generation of Energy, including, but not limited to, reporting, registering, tracking, allocating for or accounting for such emissions. Promptly following Buyer’s written request, Seller agrees to take all commercially reasonable actions and execute or provide any and all documents, information, or instruments with respect to generation by the Facility reasonably necessary to permit Buyer to comply with such requirements, if any. 1.32. Reporting and Record Retention. 1.32.1. Seller shall use commercially reasonable efforts to meet the Milestone Schedule set forth in Appendix E and avoid or minimize any delays in meeting such schedule. Seller shall provide Project development status reports in a format and a frequency, which shall not exceed one (1) report per month, specified by the Buyer. The report shall describe Seller’s progress relative to the development, construction, and startup of the Facility, as well as a Notice of any anticipated change to the Commercial Operation Date and whether Seller is on schedule to meet the Commercial Operation Date. 1.32.2. Seller shall within ten (10) Business Days of receipt thereof provide to Buyer copies of any Interconnection Agreement and all other material reports, studies and analyses furnished by any Transmission/Distribution Owner, and any correspondence with the Transmission/Distribution Owner related thereto, concerning the interconnection of the Facility to the Transmission/Distribution Owner’s electric system or the transmission of Energy on the Transmission/Distribution Owners’ electric system. Page 187 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2021-00175 – CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA January 5, 2022 Page 16 1.32.3. Seller shall provide to Buyer on the Commercial Operation Date, and within thirty (30) days after the completion of each Contract Year thereafter during the Delivery Term, a copy of any inspection and maintenance report regarding the Facility that was also provided to the Transmission/Distribution Owner during the previous Contract Year. 1.33. Tax Withholding Documentation. Upon Buyer’s request, Seller shall promptly provide to Buyer Internal Revenue Service tax Form W-9 and California tax Form 590 (or their equivalent), completed with Seller’s information, and any other documentation necessary for Buyer to comply with its tax reporting or withholding obligations with respect to Seller. 1.34. Modifications to Facility. During the Delivery Term, Seller shall not repower or materially modify or alter the Facility without the written consent of Buyer. Material modifications or alterations include, but are not limited to, (a) movement of the Site, (b) changes that may increase or decrease the expected output of the Facility other than as allowed under Section 3.2, (c) changes that may affect the generation profile of the Facility, (d) changes that may affect the ability to accurately measure the output of Product from the Facility and (e) changes that conflict with elections, information, or requirements specified elsewhere in this Agreement. Material modifications or alterations do not include maintenance and repairs performed in accordance with Prudent Electrical Practices. Seller shall provide to Buyer Notice not less than ninety (90) days before any proposed repowering, modification, or alteration occurs describing the repowering, modification, or alteration to Buyer’s reasonable satisfaction. 1.35. No Additional Incentives. Seller agrees that during the Term of this Agreement it shall not seek additional compensation or other benefits pursuant to the Self-Generation Incentive Program, as defined in CPUC Decision 01-03-073, the California Solar Initiative, as defined in CPUC Decision 06-01-024, Buyer’s net energy metering tariff, or other similar California ratepayer subsidized program relating to energy production with respect to the Facility. 1.36. Site Control. Seller shall have Site Control as of the earlier of: (a) the Commercial Operation Date; or (b) any date before the Commercial Operation Date to the extent necessary for the Seller to perform its obligations under this Agreement and, in each case, Seller shall maintain Site Control throughout the Delivery Term. Seller shall promptly provide Buyer with Notice if there is any change in the status of Seller’s Site Control. ARTICLE SEVEN. INDEMNITY 1.37. Seller shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless Buyer and its directors, officers, officials, and employees against and from any and all loss, liability, damage, expense, Page 188 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2021-00175 – CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA January 5, 2022 Page 17 and costs (including without limitation costs and fees of litigation and reasonable attorneys’ fees) of every nature resulting from or arising out of Seller’s performance of its obligations under this Agreement, or its failure to comply with any of its obligations contained in this Agreement, except such loss or damage which was caused by the sole negligence or willful misconduct of Buyer. 1.38. Buyer shall not be responsible for any cost of decommissioning or demolition of the Facility or any environmental or other liability associated with the decommissioning or demolition of the Facility without regard to the timing or cause of the decommissioning or demolition. Seller agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless, Buyer for any costs incurred by Buyer if and to the extent that Seller’s actions or inactions causes any or all of them to become required, whether statutorily or otherwise, to bear the cost of any decommissioning or demolition of the Facility or any environmental or other liability associated therewith, including, but not limited to, any investigations, actions, suits, claims, demands, losses, liabilities, penalties, and expenses (including reasonable attorneys’ fees) associated with clean-up costs and defense costs. The indemnity requirements set forth in this Section shall survive the termination of this Agreement. ARTICLE EIGHT. LIMITATION OF DAMAGES EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE PROVIDED IN THIS AGREEMENT THERE IS NO WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, AND ANY AND ALL IMPLIED WARRANTIES ARE DISCLAIMED. LIABILITY SHALL BE LIMITED TO DIRECT ACTUAL DAMAGES ONLY, SUCH DIRECT ACTUAL DAMAGES SHALL BE THE SOLE AND EXCLUSIVE REMEDY AND ALL OTHER REMEDIES OR DAMAGES AT LAW OR IN EQUITY ARE WAIVED UNLESS EXPRESSLY HEREIN PROVIDED. NEITHER PARTY SHALL BE LIABLE FOR CONSEQUENTIAL, INCIDENTAL, PUNITIVE, EXEMPLARY OR INDIRECT DAMAGES, LOST PROFITS OR OTHER BUSINESS INTERRUPTION DAMAGES, BY STATUTE, IN TORT OR CONTRACT, UNDER ANY INDEMNITY PROVISION OR OTHERWISE. UNLESS EXPRESSLY HEREIN PROVIDED, AND SUBJECT TO THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 7 (INDEMNITY), IT IS THE INTENT OF THE PARTIES THAT THE LIMITATIONS HEREIN IMPOSED ON REMEDIES AND THE MEASURE OF DAMAGES BE WITHOUT REGARD TO THE CAUSE OR CAUSES RELATED THERETO, INCLUDING THE NEGLIGENCE OF ANY PARTY, WHETHER SUCH NEGLIGENCE BE SOLE, JOINT OR CONCURRENT, OR ACTIVE OR PASSIVE. ARTICLE NINE. INSURANCE 1.39. Insurance Coverage. Seller shall, at its own expense, starting on the Execution Date and until the end of the Term, and for such additional periods as may be specified below, provide and maintain in effect the following insurance policies and minimum limits of coverage as specified below, and such additional coverage as may be required Page 189 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2021-00175 – CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA January 5, 2022 Page 18 by Law, with insurance companies authorized to do business in the state in which the services are to be performed, with an A.M. Best’s Insurance Rating of not less than A- :VII. 1.39.1. Commercial General Liability Insurance. Commercial general liability insurance, written on an occurrence, not claims-made basis, covering all operations by or on behalf of Seller arising out of or connected with this Agreement, including coverage for bodily injury, broad form property damage, personal and advertising injury, products/completed operations, contractual liability, premises-operations, owners and contractors protective, hazard, explosion, collapse and underground. Such insurance must bear a combined single limit per occurrence and annual aggregate of not less than five million dollars ($5,000,000.00), exclusive of defense costs, for all coverages. Such insurance must contain standard cross-liability and severability of interest provisions. The Seller shall name the Buyer, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers as additional insureds on the completed operations policy. The completed operations policy shall be as broad as one of the following ISO forms CG 20 37, 2039, or CG 20 40. Completed operations coverage must be maintained for a period of not less than four (4) years after this Agreement terminates. If Seller elects, with Buyer’s written concurrence, to use a “claims made” form of commercial general liability insurance, then the following additional requirements apply: (a) the retroactive date of the policy must be prior to the Execution Date; and (b) either the coverage must be maintained for a period of not less than four (4) years after this Agreement terminates, or the policy must provide for a supplemental extended reporting period of not less than four (4) years after this Agreement terminates. Governmental agencies which have an established record of self-insurance may provide the required coverage through self-insurance. 1.39.2. Workers’ Compensation Insurance. Workers’ compensation insurance with statutory limits, as required by the state having jurisdiction over Seller’s employees, and employer’s liability insurance with limits of not less than: (a) bodily injury by accident - one million dollars ($1,000,000.00) each accident; (b) bodily injury by disease - one million dollars ($1,000,000.00) policy limit; and (c) bodily injury by disease - one million dollars ($1,000,000.00) each employee. 1.39.3. Commercial Automobile Liability Insurance. Commercial automobile liability insurance covering bodily injury and property damage with a combined single limit of not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000.00) per occurrence. Such insurance must cover liability arising out of Seller’s use of all owned, non-owned and hired automobiles in the performance of the Agreement. 1.39.4. Umbrella/excess liability Insurance. Umbrella/excess liability insurance, written on an occurrence, not claims-made basis, providing coverage excess of the underlying employer’s liability, commercial general liability, and commercial automobile liability insurance, on terms at least as broad as the underlying coverage, Page 190 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2021-00175 – CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA January 5, 2022 Page 19 with limits of not less than four million dollars ($4,000,000.00) per occurrence and in the annual aggregate. 1.39.5. Pollution Liability Insurance. If the scope of work involves areas of known pollutants or contaminants, pollution liability coverage will be required to cover bodily injury, property damage, including clean-up costs and defense costs resulting from sudden, and accidental conditions, including the discharge, dispersal, release or escape of smoke, vapors, soot, fumes, acids, alkalis, toxic chemicals, hydrocarbons, liquids or gases, waste materials or other irritants, contaminants or pollutants into or upon land, the atmosphere or any water course or body of water shall be maintained. The limit will not be less than one million dollars ($1,000,000.00) per occurrence or claim, and $2,000,000 policy aggregate for bodily injury and property damage. The policy will endorse RCMU as additional insured. If the contractor maintains broader coverage and/or higher limits than the minimums shown above for all policies, the City requires and shall be entitled to the broader coverage and/or higher limits maintained by the contractor. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to the City. 1.40. Additional Insurance Provisions. 1.40.1. On or before the later of (a) sixty (60) days after the Execution Date and (b) the date immediately preceding commencement of construction of the Facility, and again within a reasonable time after coverage is renewed or replaced, Seller shall furnish to Buyer certificates of insurance evidencing the coverage required above, written on forms and with deductibles reasonably acceptable to Buyer. Notwithstanding the foregoing sentence, Seller shall in no event furnish Buyer certificates of insurance evidencing required coverage later than the Commercial Operation Date. All deductibles, co-insurance and self-insured retentions applicable to the insurance above must be paid by Seller. All certificates of insurance must note that the insurers issuing coverage must endeavor to provide Buyer with at least thirty (30) days’ prior written notice in the event of cancellation of coverage. Buyer’s receipt of certificates that do not comply with the requirements stated in this Section 9.2.1, or Seller’s failure to provide such certificates, do not limit or relieve Seller of the duties and responsibility of maintaining insurance in compliance with the requirements in this Section 9 and do not constitute a waiver of any of the requirements of Section 9. 1.40.2. Insurance coverage described above in Section 9.1 shall provide for thirty (30) days written Notice to Buyer prior to cancellation, termination, alteration, or material change of such insurance. Page 191 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2021-00175 – CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA January 5, 2022 Page 20 1.40.3. Evidence of coverage described above in Section 9.1 shall state that coverage provided is primary and is not excess to or contributing with any insurance or self- insurance maintained by Buyer. 1.40.4. Buyer shall have the right to inspect or obtain a copy of the original policy(ies) of insurance. 1.40.5. All insurance certificates, endorsements, cancellations, terminations, alterations, and material changes of such insurance must be issued, clearly labeled with this Agreement’s identification number and submitted in accordance with Section 10 and Appendix F. 1.40.6. The insurance requirements set forth in Section 9.1 shall apply as primary insurance to, without a right of contribution from, any other insurance maintained by or afforded to Buyer, its subsidiaries and Affiliates, and their respective officers, directors, shareholders, agents, and employees, regardless of any conflicting provision in Seller's policies to the contrary. To the extent permitted by Law, Seller and its insurers shall be required to waive all rights of recovery from or subrogation against Buyer, its subsidiaries and Affiliates, and their respective officers, directors, shareholders, agents, employees and insurers. The commercial general liability insurance required in Section 9.1.1 and the umbrella/excess liability insurance required in Section 9.1.4 must name Buyer, its subsidiaries and Affiliates, and their respective officers, directors, shareholders, agents and employees, as additional insureds for liability arising out of Seller’s construction, use or ownership of the Facility. The Worker’s Compensation policy shall be endorsed with a waiver of subrogation in favor of the Buyer for all work performed by the Seller, its employees, agents and subcontractors. 1.40.7. Seller shall remain liable for all acts, omissions or default of any subcontractor or subsupplier and shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless Buyer for any and all loss or damages, as well as all costs, charges and expenses which Buyer may suffer, incur, or bear as a result of any acts, omissions or default by or on behalf of any subcontractor or subsupplier. 1.40.8. If Seller fails to comply with any of the provisions of this Section 9, Seller, among other things and without restricting Buyer’s remedies under Law or otherwise, shall, at its own cost, act as an insurer and provide insurance in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Section 9. With respect to the required commercial general liability insurance set forth in Section 9.1.1, umbrella/excess liability insurance set forth in Section 9.1.4, commercial automobile liability insurance set forth in Section 9.1.3, and pollution liability insurance set forth in Section 9.1.5 Seller shall provide a current, full and complete defense to Buyer, its subsidiaries and Affiliates, and their respective officers, directors, shareholders, agents, employees, assigns, and successors in interest, in response to a third party claim in the same manner that an insurer with an A.M. Page 192 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2021-00175 – CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA January 5, 2022 Page 21 Best’s Insurance Rating of A-:VII would have, had the insurance been maintained in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in this Section 9 and given the required additional insured wording in the commercial general liability insurance and umbrella/excess liability insurance, and standard “Who is an Insured” provision in commercial automobile liability form. ARTICLE TEN. NOTICES Notices (other than forecasts and scheduling requests) shall, unless otherwise specified herein, be in writing and may be delivered by hand delivery, United States mail, overnight courier service, facsimile, or electronic messaging (e-mail). A notice sent by facsimile transmission or e-mail will be recognized and shall be deemed received on the Business Day on which such notice was transmitted if received before 5 p.m. Pacific prevailing time (and if received after 5 p.m., on the next Business Day) and a notice by overnight mail or courier shall be deemed to have been received on the next Business Day after such Notice is sent or such earlier time as is confirmed by the receiving Party unless it confirms a prior oral communication, in which case any such notice shall be deemed received on the day sent. A Party may change its addresses by providing notice of same in accordance with this provision. All Notices, requests, invoices, statements or payments for this Facility must reference this Agreements identification number. Notices shall be provided as indicated in Appendix F. ARTICLE ELEVEN. FORCE MAJEURE 1.41. No Default for Force Majeure. Neither Party shall be in default in the performance of any of its obligations set forth in this Agreement when and to the extent failure of performance is caused by Force Majeure. 1.42. Requirements Applicable to Claiming Party. If a Party, because of Force Majeure, is rendered wholly or partly unable to perform its obligations when due under this Agreement, such Party (the “Claiming Party”) shall be excused from whatever performance is affected by the Force Majeure to the extent so affected. In order to be excused from its performance obligations under this Agreement by reason of Force Majeure: 1.42.1. The Claiming Party, on or before the fourteenth (14th) day after the initial occurrence of the claimed Force Majeure, must give the other Party Notice describing the particulars of the occurrence; and 1.42.2. The Claiming Party must provide timely evidence reasonably sufficient to establish that the occurrence constitutes Force Majeure as defined in this Agreement. 1.43. Limitations. The suspension of the Claiming Party’s performance due to Force Majeure may not be greater in scope or longer in duration than is required by such Force Majeure. In addition, the Claiming Party shall use diligent efforts to remedy its Page 193 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2021-00175 – CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA January 5, 2022 Page 22 inability to perform. When the Claiming Party is able to resume performance of its obligations under this Agreement, the Claiming Party shall give the other Party prompt Notice to that effect. 1.44. Termination. Either Party may terminate this Agreement on at least five (5) Business Days’ prior Notice, in the event of Force Majeure which materially interferes with such Party’s ability to perform its obligations under this Agreement and which (a) extends for more than 365 consecutive days, (b) extends for more than a total of 365 days in any consecutive 540-day period, or (c) is consistent with Section 2.6.2.3. ARTICLE TWELVE. EVENTS OF DEFAULT AND TERMINATION 1.45. Termination. Unless terminated earlier pursuant to Section 11.4 or this Section 12, this Agreement automatically terminates immediately following the last day of the Delivery Term. 1.46. Events of Default. An “Event of Default” means, with respect to a Party, the occurrence of any of the following: 1.46.1. With respect to either Party: 1.46.1.1. A Party becomes Bankrupt; 1.46.1.2. Except for an obligation to make payment when due, if there is a failure of a Party to perform any material covenant or obligation set forth in this Agreement (except to the extent such failure provides a separate termination right for the non-breaching Party or to the extent excused by Force Majeure), if such failure is not remedied within thirty (30) days after Notice thereof from the non-breaching Party to the breaching Party; 1.46.1.3. A Party fails to make any payment due and owing under this Agreement, if such failure is not cured within ten (10) Business Days after Notice from the non-breaching Party to the breaching Party; or 1.46.1.4. Any representation or warranty made by a Party (a) is false or misleading in any material respect when made or (b) becomes false or misleading in any material respect during the Term. 1.46.2. With respect to Seller: 1.46.2.1. Seller fails to take all corrective actions specified in any Buyer Notice, within the time frame set forth in such Notice, that the Facility is out of compliance with any term of this Agreement; provided that if such corrective action falls under a specific termination right under Section 12.2.2, then the time frame, if any, set forth for such right shall apply; Page 194 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2021-00175 – CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA January 5, 2022 Page 23 1.46.2.2. The Facility has not achieved Commercial Operation by the expected Commercial Operation Date specified in Section 2.6.1 and Seller has not elected to pay daily delay damages pursuant to Section 2.6.4; 1.46.2.3. Subject to Section 11, Seller delivers less than eighty percent (80%) of the applicable Contract Quantity from the Facility to Buyer for a period of two (2) consecutive Contract Years; 1.46.2.4. Seller fails to maintain its status as an ERR as set forth in Section 4.5 of the Agreement; 1.46.2.5. Seller abandons the Facility; 1.46.2.6. Seller installs generating equipment at the Facility that exceeds the Contract Capacity and such excess generating capacity is not removed within five (5) Business Days after Notice from Buyer; 1.46.2.7. Seller delivers or attempts to deliver to the Delivery Point for sale under this Agreement product that was not generated by the Facility; 1.46.2.8. Seller fails to install any of the equipment or devices necessary for the Facility to satisfy the Contract Capacity set forth in Section 3.1; 1.46.2.9. An unauthorized assignment of the Agreement, as set forth in Section 15; 1.46.2.10. Seller fails to reimburse Buyer any amounts due under this Agreement; 1.46.2.11. Seller breaches the requirements in Section 6.12 regarding incentives; or 1.46.2.12. Seller fails to maintain the Collateral Requirement set forth in Section 3.9. 1.46.2.13. The annualized customer load associated with the Facility pursuant to Section 17.76.020 of Chapter 17.76 of (Alternative Energy Systems and Facilities) of Article IV (Site Development Provisions) of Title 17 (Development Code) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is less than fifty percent (50%) of the Contract Quantity, as measured over a Contract Year. 1.47. Declaration of an Event of Default. If an Event of Default has occurred, the non- defaulting Party shall have the right to: (a) send Notice, designating a day, no earlier Page 195 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2021-00175 – CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA January 5, 2022 Page 24 than five (5) days after such Notice and no later than twenty (20) days after such Notice, as an early termination date of this Agreement (“Early Termination Date”); (b) accelerate all amounts owing between the Parties; (c) terminate this Agreement and end the Delivery Term effective as of the Early Termination Date; (d) collect any Settlement Amount under Section 12.5; and (e) if the defaulting party is the Seller and Buyer terminates the Agreement prior to the start of the Commercial Operation Date, Buyer shall have the right to retain the entire Reservation Deposit. 1.48. Suspension of Performance. If an Event of Default shall have occurred, the non- defaulting Party has the right to immediately suspend performance under this Agreement and pursue all remedies available at Law or in equity against the defaulting Party (including monetary damages), except to the extent that such remedies are limited by the terms of this Agreement. 1.49. Calculation of Settlement Amount. 1.49.1. If either Party exercises a termination right under Section 12.3 after the Commercial Operation Date, the non-defaulting Party shall calculate a settlement amount (“Settlement Amount”) equal to the amount of the non-defaulting Party’s aggregate Losses and Costs less any Gains, determined as of the Early Termination Date. Prior to the Commercial Operation Date, the Settlement Amount shall be Zero dollars ($0). 1.49.2. If the non-defaulting Party’s aggregate Gains exceed its aggregate Losses and Costs, if any, determined as of the Early Termination Date, the Settlement Amount shall be Zero dollars ($0). 1.49.3. The Buyer shall not have to enter into replacement transactions to establish a Settlement Amount. 1.49.4. Buyer shall have the right to draw upon the Collateral Requirement to collect any Settlement Amount owed to Buyer. 1.50. Rights and Remedies Are Cumulative. The rights and remedies of the Parties pursuant to this Section 12 shall be cumulative and in addition to the rights of the Parties otherwise provided in this Agreement. 1.51. Duty to Mitigate. Buyer and Seller shall each have a duty to mitigate damages pursuant to this Agreement, and each shall use reasonable efforts to minimize any damages it may incur as a result of the other Party’s non-performance of this Agreement, including with respect to termination of this Agreement. Page 196 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2021-00175 – CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA January 5, 2022 Page 25 ARTICLE THIRTEEN. GOVERNMENTAL CHARGES 1.52. Governmental Charges. Seller shall pay or cause to be paid all taxes imposed by any Governmental Authority (“Governmental Charges”) on or with respect to the Product or the Transaction arising at the Delivery Point, including, but not limited to, ad valorem taxes and other taxes attributable to the Project, land, land rights or interests in land for the Project. Buyer shall pay or cause to be paid all Governmental Charges on or with respect to the Product or the Transaction from the Delivery Point. In the event Seller is required by Law or regulation to remit or pay Governmental Charges which are Buyer’s responsibility hereunder, Buyer shall reimburse Seller for such Governmental Charges within thirty (30) days of Notice by Seller. If Buyer is required by Law or regulation to remit or pay Governmental Charges which are Seller’s responsibility hereunder, Buyer may deduct such amounts from payments to Seller with respect to payments under the Agreement; if Buyer elects not to deduct such amounts from Seller’s payments, Seller shall reimburse Buyer for such amounts within thirty (30) days of Notice from Buyer. Nothing shall obligate or cause a Party to pay or be liable to pay any Governmental Charges for which it is exempt under the Law. A Party that is exempt at any time and for any reason from one or more Governmental Charges bears the risk that such exemption shall be lost or the benefit of such exemption reduced; and thus, in the event a Party’s exemption is lost or reduced, each Party’s responsibility with respect to such Governmental Charge shall be in accordance with the first four sentences of this Section. ARTICLE FOURTEEN. RELEASE OF INFORMATION AND RECORDING CONVERSATION 1.53. Release of Information. Seller authorizes Buyer to release to the FERC, CEC, CAISO, CPUC, other Governmental Authority, and/or media outlet information regarding the Facility, including the Seller’s name and location, and the size, location and operational characteristics of the Facility, the Term, the ERR type, photographs of the project, the Commercial Operation Date, greenhouse gas emissions data, and the net power rating of the Facility, as requested from time to time pursuant to the CEC’s, CPUC’s or applicable Governmental Authority’s rules and regulations. 1.54. Public Announcements. Seller shall make no public announcement regarding any aspect of this Agreement or the role of Seller in regards to the development or operation of the Project without the prior written consent of Buyer, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. Any public announcement by Seller must comply with California Business and Professions Code § 17580.5 and with the Guides for the Use of Environmental Marketing Claims, published by the Federal Trade Commission, as it may be updated from time to time. Page 197 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2021-00175 – CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA January 5, 2022 Page 26 ARTICLE FIFTEEN. ASSIGNMENT 1.55. General Assignment. Except as provided in Sections 15.2 and 15.3, Seller may not assign this Agreement or its rights hereunder without the prior written consent of the Buyer, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed so long as among other things (a) the assignee assumes the Seller’s payment and performance obligations under this Agreement, (b) the assignee agrees in writing to be bound by the terms and conditions hereof, (c) Seller delivers evidence satisfactory to Buyer of the proposed assignee’s technical and financial capability to meet or exceed Seller’s obligations hereunder and (d) the Seller delivers such tax and enforceability assurance as Buyer may reasonably request. 1.56. Assignment to Financing Providers. Seller may assign this Agreement as collateral for any financing or refinancing of the Project (including any tax equity or lease financing) with the prior written consent of the Buyer, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. The Parties agree that, the consent provided to Buyer in accordance with this Section 15.2 shall be in a form substantially similar to the Form of Financing Consent attached hereto as Appendix H; provided that (a) Buyer shall not be required to consent to any additional terms or conditions beyond those contained in Appendix H, including extension of any cure periods or additional remedies for financing providers, and (b) Seller shall be responsible at Buyer’s request for Buyer’s reasonable costs and attorneys’ fees associated with the review, negotiation, execution and delivery of documents in connection with such assignment. 1.57. Notice of Change in Control. Except in connection with public market transactions of the equity interests or capital stock of Seller or Seller’s Affiliates, Seller shall provide Buyer notice of any direct change of control of Seller (whether voluntary or by operation of Law). ARTICLE SIXTEEN. GOVERNING LAW This agreement and the rights and duties of the parties hereunder shall be governed by and construed, enforced, and performed in accordance with the laws of the State of California, without regard to principles of conflicts of law. To the extent enforceable at such time, each party waives its respective right to any jury trial with respect to any litigation arising under or in connection with this agreement. ARTICLE SEVENTEEN. DISPUTE RESOLUTION 1.58. Intent of the Parties. The sole procedure to resolve any claim arising out of or relating to this Agreement is the dispute resolution procedure set forth in this Section 17, except that either Party may seek an injunction in Superior Court in San Bernardino County, California if such action is necessary to prevent irreparable harm, in which case both Parties nonetheless will continue to pursue resolution of all other aspects of the dispute by means of this procedure. Page 198 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2021-00175 – CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA January 5, 2022 Page 27 1.59. Management Negotiations. 1.59.1. The Parties will attempt in good faith to resolve any controversy or claim arising out of or relating to this Agreement by prompt negotiations between each Party’s authorized representative, or such other person designated in writing as a representative of the Party (each a “Manager”). Either Manager may request a meeting, to be held in person or telephonically, to initiate negotiations to be held within ten (10) Business Days of the other Party’s receipt of such request, at a mutually agreed time and place. 1.59.2. All communication and writing exchanged between the Parties in connection with these negotiations shall be deemed inadmissible as evidence such that it cannot be used or referred to in any subsequent judicial or arbitration process between the Parties, whether with respect to this dispute or any other. 1.59.3. If the matter is not resolved within forty-five (45) days of commencement of negotiations under Section 17.2.1, or if the Party receiving the written request to meet refuses or does not meet within the ten (10) Business Day period specified in Section 17.2.1, either Party may initiate arbitration of the controversy or claim according to the terms of Section 17.3. 1.60. Arbitration Initiation. If the dispute cannot be resolved by negotiation as set forth in Section 17.2 above, then the Parties shall resolve such controversy through arbitration (“Arbitration”). The Arbitration shall be adjudicated by one retired judge or justice from the JAMS panel. The Arbitration shall take place in San Bernardino County, California, and shall be administered by and in accordance with JAMS’ Commercial Arbitration Rules. If the Parties cannot mutually agree on the arbitrator who will adjudicate the dispute, then JAMS shall provide the Parties with an arbitrator pursuant to its then-applicable Commercial Arbitration Rules. The arbitrator shall have no affiliation with, financial or other interest in, or prior employment with either Party and shall be knowledgeable in the field of the dispute. Either Party may initiate Arbitration by filing with the JAMS a notice of intent to arbitrate at any time following the unsuccessful conclusion of the management negotiations provided for in Section 17.2. ARTICLE EIGHTEEN. MISCELLANEOUS 1.61. Severability. If any provision in this Agreement is determined to be invalid, void or unenforceable by any court having jurisdiction, such determination shall not invalidate, void, or make unenforceable any other provision, agreement or covenant of this Agreement. Any provision of this Agreement held invalid or unenforceable only in part or degree will remain in full force and effect to the extent not held invalid or unenforceable. Page 199 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2021-00175 – CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA January 5, 2022 Page 28 1.62. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts each of which shall be deemed an original and all of which shall be deemed one and the same Agreement. Delivery of an executed counterpart of this Agreement by facsimile or PDF transmission will be deemed as effective as delivery of an originally executed counterpart. Each Party delivering an executed counterpart of this Agreement by facsimile or PDF transmission shall also deliver an originally executed counterpart, but the failure of any Party to deliver an originally executed counterpart of this Agreement shall not affect the validity or effectiveness of this Agreement. 1.63. General. No amendment to or modification of this Agreement shall be enforceable unless reduced to writing and executed by both Parties. This Agreement shall not impart any rights enforceable by any third party other than a permitted successor or assignee bound to this Agreement. Waiver by a Party of any default by the other Party shall not be construed as a waiver of any other default. The term “including” when used in this Agreement shall be by way of example only and shall not be considered in any way to be in limitation. The headings used herein are for convenience and reference purposes only. 1.64. Interpretation. Whenever this Agreement specifically refers to any Law, tariff, Governmental Authority, regional reliability council, Transmission/Distribution Owner, or credit rating agency, the Parties hereby agree that the references also refers to any successor to such Law, tariff or organization. 1.65. Construction. The Agreement will not be construed against any Party as a result of the preparation, substitution, or other event of negotiation, drafting or execution thereof. 1.66. Forward Contract. The Parties acknowledge and agree that this Agreement constitutes a “forward contract” within the meaning of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, and Buyer and Seller are “forward contract merchants” within the meaning of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. Each Party further agrees that, for all purposes of this Agreement, each Party waives and agrees not to assert the applicability of the provisions of 11 U.S.C. § 366 in any Bankruptcy proceeding wherein such Party is a debtor. In any such proceeding, each Party further waives the right to assert that the other Party is a provider of last resort to the extent such term relates to 11 U.S.C. §366 or another provision of 11 U.S.C. § 101-1532. 1.67. Change in Electric Market Design. If a change in the CAISO Tariff renders this Agreement or any provisions hereof incapable of being performed or administered, then any Party may request that Buyer and Seller enter into negotiations to make the minimum changes to this Agreement necessary to make this Agreement capable of being performed and administered, while attempting to preserve to the maximum extent possible the benefits, burdens, and obligations set forth in this Agreement as of the Execution Date. Upon delivery of such a request, Buyer and Seller shall engage in Page 200 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2021-00175 – CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA January 5, 2022 Page 29 such negotiations in good faith. If Buyer and Seller are unable, within sixty (60) days after delivery of such request, to agree upon changes to this Agreement or to resolve issues relating to changes to this Agreement, then any Party may submit issues pertaining to changes to this Agreement to the dispute resolution process set forth in Article 17. Notwithstanding the foregoing, (i) a change in cost shall not in and of itself be deemed to render this Agreement or any of the provisions hereof incapable of being performed or administered, and (ii) all of the unaffected provisions of this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect during any period of such negotiation or dispute resolution. 1.68. Further Assurances. Each of the Parties hereto agrees to provide such information, execute and deliver any instruments and documents and to take such other actions as may be necessary or reasonably requested by the other Party which are not inconsistent with the provisions of this Agreement and which do not involve the assumptions of obligations other than those provided for in this Agreement, to give full effect to this Agreement and to carry out the intent of this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each Party has caused this Agreement to be duly executed by its authorized representative as of the date of last signature provided below. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA (Seller) (Buyer) (Signature) (Signature) (Type/Print Name) (Type/Print Name) (Title) (Title) (Date) (Date) Page 201 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2021-00175 – CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA January 5, 2022 Page 30 Appendix A – Definitions “Affiliate” means, with respect to a Party, any entity that, directly or indirectly, through one or more intermediaries, controls, or is controlled by, or is under common control with that Party. “Arbitration" has the meaning set forth in Section 17. “As-Available Facility” means a generating facility that is powered by one of the following sources, except for a de minimis amount of Energy from other sources: (a) wind, (b) solar energy, (c) hydroelectric potential derived from small conduit water distribution facilities that do not have storage capability, or (d) other variable sources of energy that are contingent upon natural forces other than geothermal. “Available Capacity” means the rated alternating current (AC) generating capacity of the Facility, expressed in whole kilowatts, that is available to generate Product. “Bankrupt” means with respect to any entity, such entity: (a) Files a petition or otherwise commences, authorizes or acquiesces in the commencement of a proceeding or cause of action under any bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization or similar law, or has any such petition filed or commenced against it; (b) Makes an assignment or any general arrangement for the benefit of creditors; (c) Otherwise becomes bankrupt or insolvent (however evidenced); (d) Has a liquidator, administrator, receiver, trustee, conservator or similar official appointed with respect to such entity or any substantial portion of its property or assets; or (e) Is generally unable to pay its debts as they fall due. “Baseload Facility” means a generating facility that does not qualify as an As-Available Facility. “Business Day” means any day except a Saturday, Sunday, a Federal Reserve Bank holiday, or the Friday following Thanksgiving during the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. local time for the relevant Party’s principal place of business where the relevant Party in each instance shall be the Party from whom the notice, payment or delivery is being sent. “CAISO” means the California Independent System Operator Corporation or any successor entity performing similar functions. “CAISO Grid” means the system of transmission lines and associated facilities that have been placed under the CAISO’s operational control. Page 202 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2021-00175 – CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA January 5, 2022 Page 31 “CAISO Tariff” means the CAISO FERC Electric Tariff, Fifth Replacement Volume No. 1, as amended from time to time. “California Renewables Portfolio Standard” means the renewable energy program and policies codified in California Public Utilities Code Sections 399.11 through 399.33 and California Public Resources Code Sections 25740 through 25751, as such provisions may be amended or supplemented from time to time. “Capacity Attributes” means any current or future defined characteristic, certificate, tag, credit, or ancillary service attribute, whether general in nature or specific as to the location or any other attribute of the Project, intended to value any aspect of the capacity of the Project to produce Energy or ancillary services, including, but not limited to, any accounting construct so that the full Contract Capacity of the Project may be counted toward a Resource Adequacy Requirement or any other measure by the CPUC, the CAISO, the FERC, or any other entity invested with the authority under federal or state Law, to require Buyer to procure, or to procure at Buyer’s expense, Resource Adequacy Benefits or other such products. “CEC” means the California Energy Commission or its successor agency. “CEC Certification” means certification by the CEC that the Facility is an ERR and that all Energy produced by the Facility qualifies as generation from an ERR. “CEC Pre-Certification” means provisional certification of the proposed Facility as an ERR by the CEC upon submission by a facility of a complete application and required supplemental information. “Check Meter” means the Buyer revenue-quality meter section(s) or meter(s), which Buyer may require at its discretion, and which will include those devices normally supplied by Buyer or Seller under the applicable utility electric service requirements. “City Manager” means the City Manager of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. “Claiming Party” has the meaning set forth in Section 10.2. “Commercial Operation” means the Contract Capacity has been installed and the Facility is operating and able to produce and deliver the Product to Buyer pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. “Commercial Operation Date” means the date on which the Facility achieves Commercial Operation. “Contract Capacity” means the amount of electric energy generating capacity, set forth in Section 3.1, that Seller commits to install at the Site. “Contract Price” has the meaning set forth in Section 3.6. Page 203 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2021-00175 – CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA January 5, 2022 Page 32 “Contract Quantity” has the meaning set forth in Section 3.2. “Contract Year” means a period of twelve (12) consecutive months with the first Contract Year commencing on the Commercial Operation Date and each subsequent Contract Year commencing on the anniversary of the Commercial Operation Date. “Costs” means (a) brokerage fees, commissions and other similar third-party transaction costs and expenses reasonably incurred either in terminating any arrangement pursuant to which it has hedged its obligations or in entering into new arrangements which replace the Transaction; and (b) all reasonable attorneys’ fees and expenses incurred in connection with the termination of the Transaction. “CPUC” means the California Public Utilities Commission, or successor entity. “Credit Rating” means, with respect to any entity, (a) the rating then assigned to such entity’s unsecured senior long-term debt obligations (not supported by third party credit enhancements), or (b) if such entity does not have a rating for its unsecured senior long-term debt obligations, then the rating assigned to such entity as an issuer rating by S&P and/or Moody’s. If the entity is rated by both S&P and Moody’s and such ratings are not equivalent, the lower of the two ratings shall determine the Credit Rating. If the entity is rated by either S&P or Moody’s, but not both, then the available rating shall determine the Credit Rating. “Current Inverters” means devices used to convert DC electric energy to alternating current electric energy. “Curtailment Order” means any instruction from Buyer to Seller to reduce the delivery of Energy from the Facility for any reason other than as set forth in Sections 3.6.3 (a) or (b). “DC” means direct current. “DC Collection System” means the DC equipment, cables, components, devices and materials that interconnect the Photovoltaic Modules with the Current Inverters. “Delivered Energy” means all Energy produced from the Facility and delivered by Seller to the Delivery Point, expressed in kWh, as recorded by the meter specified in Section 6.2.1 or the Check Meter, as applicable. “Delivery Point” has the meaning set forth in Section 2.5. “Delivery Term” has the meaning set forth in Section 3.5. “Early Termination Date” has the meaning set forth in Section 12.3. “Eligible Renewable Energy Resource” or “ERR” has the meaning set forth in Public Utilities Code Sections 399.12 or Section 399.16 and California Public Resources Code Section 25741, as these code provision may be amended or supplemented from time to time. Page 204 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2021-00175 – CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA January 5, 2022 Page 33 “Emergency” means (a) an actual or imminent condition or situation which jeopardizes the integrity of the electric system or the integrity of any other systems to which the electric system is connected or any condition so defined and declared by the CAISO; or (b) an emergency condition as defined under an Interconnection Agreement and any abnormal interconnection or system condition that requires automatic or immediate manual action to prevent or limit loss of load or generation supply, that could adversely affect the reliability of the electric system or generation supply, that could adversely affect the reliability of any interconnected system, or that could otherwise pose a threat to public safety. “Energy” means three-phase, 60-cycle alternating current electric energy measured in kWh, net of Station Use. For purposes of the definition of “Green Attributes,” the word “energy” shall have the meaning set forth in this definition. “Execution Date” means the latest signature date found at the end of the Agreement. “Facility” has the meaning set forth in Section 2. The terms “Facility” or “Project” as used in this Agreement are interchangeable. “FERC” means the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission or any successor government agency. “Force Majeure” means an event or circumstance which prevents one Party from performing its obligations under the Agreement, which event or circumstance was not anticipated as of the Execution Date, which is not within the reasonable control of, or the result of the negligence of, the Claiming Party, and which, by the exercise of due diligence, the Claiming Party is unable to overcome or avoid or cause to be avoided, including war, riot, civil disturbance or disobedience, terrorism, sabotage, strike or labor dispute. Force Majeure does not include: (a) the lack of wind, sun, or other fuel source of an inherently intermittent nature; (b) reductions in generation from the Facility resulting from ordinary wear and tear, deferred maintenance or operator error; or (c) any delay in providing, or cancellation of, interconnection service by a Transmission/Distribution Owner or the CAISO, except to the extent such delay or cancellation is the result of a Force Majeure claimed by the Transmission/Distribution Owner or the CAISO. Force Majeure may include delays in performance or inability to perform or comply with the terms and conditions of this Agreement due to delays in obtaining necessary equipment, labor, or materials or other issues caused by or attributable to pandemics or epidemics, including the disease designated COVID-19 or the related virus designated SARS-CoV-2 or any mutations thereof (collectively, “COVID-19”), if the elements of Force Majeure defined in the first sentence hereof (other than the requirement that the event or circumstance was not anticipated as of the date the Agreement was agreed to) have been satisfied; provided, however, that the general existence of COVID-19 shall not be sufficient to prove the existence of a Force Majeure absent a showing of other facts and circumstances which in the aggregate establish that a Force Majeure as defined in the first sentence hereof (other than the requirement that the event or circumstance was not anticipated as of the date the Agreement was agreed to) has occurred. Page 205 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2021-00175 – CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA January 5, 2022 Page 34 “Gains” means with respect to any Party, an amount equal to the present value of the economic benefit to it, if any (exclusive of Costs), resulting from the termination of the Transaction, determined in a commercially reasonable manner, subject to Section 12.5. Factors used in determining economic benefit may include, without limitation, reference to information either available to it internally or supplied by one or more third parties, including, without limitation, quotations (either firm or indicative) of relevant rates, prices, yields, yield curves, volatilities, spreads or other relevant market data in the relevant markets, market price referent, market prices for a comparable transaction, forward price curves based on economic analysis of the relevant markets, settlement prices for a comparable transaction at liquid trading platforms (e.g., NYMEX), all of which should be calculated for the remaining Delivery Term to determine the value of the Product. “Governmental Authority” means any federal, state, local or municipal government, governmental department, commission, board, bureau, agency, or instrumentality, or any judicial, regulatory or administrative body, having jurisdiction as to the matter in question. “Governmental Charges” has the meaning set forth in Section 13.1. “Green Attributes” means any and all credits, benefits, emissions reductions, offsets, and allowances, howsoever entitled, attributable to the generation from the Project, and its avoided emission of pollutants. Green Attributes include but are not limited to Renewable Energy Credits, as well as: (1) any avoided emission of pollutants to the air, soil or water such as sulfur oxides (SOx), nitrogen oxides (NOx), carbon monoxide (CO) and other pollutants; (2) any avoided emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide, hydrofluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons, sulfur hexafluoride and other greenhouse gases (GHGs) that have been determined by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, or otherwise by law, to contribute to the actual or potential threat of altering the Earth’s climate by trapping heat in the atmosphere; (3) the reporting rights to these avoided emissions, such as Green Tag Reporting Rights. Green Tag Reporting Rights are the right of a Green Tag Purchaser to report the ownership of accumulated Green Tags in compliance with federal or state law, if applicable, and to a federal or state agency or any other party at the Green Tag Purchaser’s discretion, and include without limitation those Green Tag Reporting Rights accruing under Section 1605(b) of The Energy Policy Act of 1992 and any present or future federal, state, or local law, regulation or bill, and international or foreign emissions trading program. Green Tags are accumulated on a MWh basis and one Green Tag represents the Green Attributes associated with one (1) MWh of Energy. Green Attributes do not include (i) any energy, capacity, reliability or other power attributes from the Project, (ii) production tax credits associated with the construction or operation of the Project and other financial incentives in the form of credits, reductions, or allowances associated with the project that are applicable to a state or federal income taxation obligation, (iii) fuel- related subsidies or “tipping fees” that may be paid to Seller to accept certain fuels, or local subsidies received by the generator for the destruction of particular preexisting pollutants or the promotion of local environmental benefits, or (iv) emission reduction credits encumbered or used by the Project for compliance with local, state, or federal operating and/or air quality permits. If the Project is a biomass or biogas facility and Seller receives any tradable Green Attributes based on the greenhouse gas reduction benefits or other emission offsets attributed to its fuel usage, it shall provide Buyer with Page 206 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2021-00175 – CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA January 5, 2022 Page 35 sufficient Green Attributes to ensure that there are zero net emissions associated with the production of electricity from the Project. “Interconnection Agreement” means the small generator interconnection agreement entered into separately between Seller, Transmission/Distribution Owner, and CAISO (as appropriate) obtained by Seller pursuant to Transmission/Distribution Owner’s Wholesale Distribution Tariff. “Interconnection Facilities” has the meaning set forth in the tariff applicable to the Seller’s Interconnection Agreement. “Interconnection Point” has the meaning set forth in Section 2.3. “Interest Rate” means the rate per annum equal to the “Monthly” Federal Funds Rate (as reset on a monthly basis based on the latest month for which such rate is available) as reported in Federal Reserve Bank Publication H.15-519, or its successor publication. “JAMS” means JAMS, Inc. or its successor entity, a judicial arbitration and mediation service. “kW” means kilowatt. “kWh” means kilowatt-hour. “kWPDC” means peak DC power. “Law” means any statute, law, treaty, rule, regulation, ordinance, code, permit, enactment, injunction, order, writ, decision, authorization, judgment, decree or other legal or regulatory determination or restriction by a court or Governmental Authority of competent jurisdiction, including any of the foregoing that are enacted, amended, or issued after the Execution Date, and which becomes effective during the Delivery Term; or any binding interpretation of the foregoing. “Letter of Credit” means an irrevocable, non-transferable standby letter of credit issued either by a U.S. commercial bank or a foreign bank with a U.S. branch office with a Credit Rating of at least “A-” by S&P and “A3” by Moody’s (without a “credit watch”, “negative outlook” or other rating decline alert if its Credit Rating is “A-” by S&P or “A3” by Moody’s). The Letter of Credit must be substantially in the form as contained in Appendix G to this Agreement; provided that if the Letter of Credit is issued by a branch of a foreign bank, Buyer may require changes to such form. “Losses” means, with respect to any Party, an amount equal to the present value of the economic loss to it, if any (exclusive of Costs), resulting from the termination of the Transaction, determined in a commercially reasonable manner, subject to Section 12.5. Factors used in determining the loss of economic benefit may include, without limitation, reference to information either available to it internally or supplied by one or more third parties including, without limitation, quotations (either firm or indicative) of relevant rates, prices, yields, yield curves, volatilities, spreads or other relevant market data in the relevant markets, market price referent, market prices for a comparable transaction, forward price curves based on economic analysis of the relevant markets, settlement prices for a Page 207 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2021-00175 – CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA January 5, 2022 Page 36 comparable transaction at liquid trading platforms (e.g. NYMEX), all of which should be calculated for the remaining term of the Transaction to determine the value of the Product. “Manager” has the meaning set forth in Section 17.2. “Mechanical Completion” means that all equipment and systems that are necessary to generate the effective capacity of the Facility are installed. The Facility is mechanically, electrically, and structurally constructed with all control systems installed and connected. The Facility is functionally complete to the extent necessary to begin commissioning and testing of the Facility, though commissioning and testing need not have commenced.” “MW” means megawatt (AC). “MWh” means megawatt-hour. “Notice,” unless otherwise specified in the Agreement, means written communications by a Party to be delivered by hand delivery, United States mail, overnight courier service, facsimile or electronic messaging (e-mail). “Party” means the Buyer or Seller individually, and “Parties” means both collectively. For purposes of Section 16 (Governing Law) the word “party” or “parties” shall have the meaning set forth in this definition. “Phasing Plan” means the plan submitted by Seller to the City of Rancho Cucamonga specifying the phases of the Project and the Contract Capacity associated with each Phase, and further, consistent with the requirements of Section 17.76.020 of Chapter 17.76 of (Alternative Energy Systems and Facilities) of Article IV (Site Development Provisions) of Title 17 (Development Code) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. “Phasing Plan Transition Event” means the occurrence of an event that transitions the Facility from one Phase to a different Phase as specified in the Phasing Plan. “Photovoltaic Module” means the individual module or component that produces DC electric energy from sun light. “Photovoltaic Module DC Rating” means, for each Photovoltaic Module installed or to be installed at the Site, the number (expressed in kWPDC) stated on the nameplate affixed thereto representing the manufacturer’s maximum (at “peak” sunlight) DC power rating at the standard test condition (“Pmp” or Power maximum at peak). “Product” means all Energy produced by the Facility throughout the Delivery Term, net of Station Use and electrical losses from the Facility to the Delivery Point; all Green Attributes; all Capacity Attributes, if any; and all Resource Adequacy Benefits, if any; generated by, associated with or attributable to the Facility throughout the Delivery Term. Page 208 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2021-00175 – CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA January 5, 2022 Page 37 “Project” has the meaning set forth in Section 2. The terms “Facility” and “Project” as used in this Agreement are interchangeable. “Prudent Electrical Practices” means those practices, methods and acts that would be implemented and followed by prudent operators of electric energy generating facilities in the Western United States, similar to the Facility, during the relevant time period, which practices, methods and acts, in the exercise of prudent and responsible professional judgment in the light of the facts known at the time the decision was made, could reasonably have been expected to accomplish the desired result consistent with good business practices, reliability and safety. Prudent Electrical Practices shall include, at a minimum, those professionally responsible practices, methods and acts described in the preceding sentence that comply with manufacturers’ warranties, restrictions in this Agreement, and the requirements of Governmental Authorities, WECC standards, the CAISO and Laws. Prudent Electrical Practices also includes taking reasonable steps to ensure that: (a) Equipment, materials, resources, and supplies, including spare parts inventories, are available to meet the Facility’s needs; (b) Sufficient operating personnel are available at all times and are adequately experienced and trained and licensed as necessary to operate the Facility properly and efficiently, and are capable of responding to reasonably foreseeable emergency conditions at the Facility and Emergencies whether caused by events on or off the Site; (c) Preventive, routine, and non-routine maintenance and repairs are performed on a basis that ensures reliable, long term and safe operation of the Facility, and are performed by knowledgeable, trained, and experienced personnel utilizing proper equipment and tools; (d) Appropriate monitoring and testing are performed to ensure equipment is functioning as designed; (e) Equipment is not operated in a reckless manner, in violation of manufacturer’s guidelines or in a manner unsafe to workers, the general public, or the Transmission/Distribution Owner’s electric system or contrary to environmental laws, permits or regulations or without regard to defined limitations such as, flood conditions, safety inspection requirements, operating voltage, current, volt ampere reactive (VAR) loading, frequency, rotational speed, polarity, synchronization, and control system limits; and (f) Equipment and components are designed and manufactured to meet or exceed the standard of durability that is generally used for electric energy generating facilities operating in the Western United States and will function properly over the full range of ambient temperature and weather conditions reasonably expected to occur at the Site and under both normal and emergency conditions. “Renewable Energy Credit” has the meaning set forth in Public Utilities Code Section 399.12(h), as may be amended from time to time or as further defined or supplemented by Law. Page 209 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2021-00175 – CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA January 5, 2022 Page 38 “Reservation Deposit” means the deposit submitted by Seller to Buyer at the time Seller submitted its application for an Industrial Zoning District Renewable PPA contract, which amount shall equal four dollars ($4.00) for each kilowatt of proposed alternating current (AC) generator capacity. Buyer shall return the Reservation Deposit to Seller once the Project achieves Commercial Operation by crediting Seller the full amount of the Reservation Deposit on Buyer’s first payment for delivered Product. Buyer shall retain the full amount of the Reservation Deposit in the event the Project does not achieve Commercial Operation by the Commercial Operation Date. “Resource Adequacy Benefits” means the rights and privileges attached to the Facility that satisfy any entity’s resource adequacy obligations, as those obligations are set forth in any Resource Adequacy Rulings and shall include any local, zonal, or otherwise locational attributes associated with the Facility. “Resource Adequacy Requirements” has the meaning set forth in Section 4.4.1. “Resource Adequacy Rulings” means any other resource adequacy laws, rules or regulations enacted, adopted or promulgated by any applicable Governmental Authority, as such decisions, rulings, Laws, rules or regulations may be amended or modified from time-to-time during the Delivery Term. “Restricted Period” has the meaning set forth in Section 12.8.1. “Settlement Amount” has the meaning set forth in Section 12.5. “Site” means the real property on which the Facility is, or will be, located, as further described in Appendix D. “Site Control” means the Seller: (a) owns the Site, (b) leases the Site, (c) is the holder of a right-of-way grant or similar instrument with respect to the Site, or (d) prior to the Commercial Operation Date, has the unilaterally exercisable contractual right to acquire or cause to be acquired on its behalf any of (a), (b), or (c). “Station Use” means energy consumed within the Facility’s electric energy distribution system as losses, as well as energy used to operate the Facility’s auxiliary equipment. The auxiliary equipment may include, but is not limited to, forced and induced draft fans, cooling towers, boiler feeds pumps, lubricating oil systems, plant lighting, fuel handling systems, control systems, and sump pumps. This use is not to exceed 1% of average annual output. “Term” has the meaning set forth in Section 3.4.1. “Transaction” means the particular transaction described in Section 3.3. “Transmission/Distribution Owner” means any entity or entities responsible for operating the electric distribution system or transmission system, as applicable, at and beyond the Interconnection Point. Page 210 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2021-00175 – CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA January 5, 2022 Page 39 “WECC” means the Western Electricity Coordinating Council, the regional reliability council for the Western United States, Northwestern Mexico and Southwestern Canada. “WREGIS” means the Western Renewable Energy Generating Information System or any successor renewable energy tracking program. “WREGIS Certificates” has the same meaning as “Certificate” as defined by WREGIS in the WREGIS Operating Rules and are designated as eligible for complying with the California Renewables Portfolio Standard. “WREGIS Operating Rules” means those operating rules and requirements adopted by WREGIS as of December 2010, as subsequently amended, supplemented or replaced (in whole or in part) from time to time. *** End of Appendix A *** Page 211 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2021-00175 – CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA January 5, 2022 Page 40 Appendix B – Commercial Operation Date Confirmation Letter In accordance with the terms of that certain Industrial Zoning District Renewable Power Purchase Agreement dated ________(“Agreement”) for the Facility named ________________________ by and between CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA “Buyer”) and ____________________ (“Seller”), this letter serves to document the Parties further agreement that (i) the conditions precedent to the occurrence of the Commercial Operation Date have been satisfied as of this _____ day of _________, ______. This letter shall confirm the Commercial Operation Date, as defined in the Agreement, as the date referenced in the preceding sentence. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each Party has caused this Agreement to be duly executed by its authorized representative as of the date of last signature provided below: By: By: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA (Seller) (Buyer) (Signature) (Signature) (Type/Print Name) (Type/Print Name) (Title) (Title) (Date) (Date) *** End of Appendix B *** Page 212 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2021-00175 – CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA January 5, 2022 Page 41 Appendix C – Forecasting Requirements A. AVAILABLE CAPACITY FORECASTING. Seller shall provide the Available Capacity forecasts described below. [The following bracketed language applies to As-Available solar or wind Projects only] [Seller’s availability forecasts below shall include Project availability and updated status of [The following bracketed language applies to solar Projects only] [photovoltaic panels, inverters, transformers, and any other equipment that may impact availability] or [The following bracketed language applies to wind Projects only] [transformers, wind turbine unit status, and any other equipment that may impact availability].] [The following bracketed language applies to As-Available Product only] Seller shall use commercially reasonable efforts to forecast the Available Capacity of the Project accurately and to transmit such information in a format reasonably acceptable to Buyer. Buyer and Seller shall agree upon reasonable changes to the requirements and procedures set forth below from time-to-time, as necessary. 1. Annual Forecast of Available Capacity. No later than (I) the earlier of July 1 of the first calendar year following the Execution Date or one hundred and eighty (180) days before the first day of the first Contract Year of the Delivery Term (“First Annual Forecast Date”), and (II) on or before July 1 for each calendar year from the First Annual Forecast Date for every subsequent Contract Year during the Delivery Term, Seller shall provide to Buyer a non-binding forecast of the hourly Available Capacity for each day in each month of the following calendar year in a form reasonably acceptable to Buyer. 2. Monthly Forecast of Available Capacity. Ten (10) Business Days before the beginning of each month during the Delivery Term, Seller shall provide to Buyer a non-binding forecast of the hourly Available Capacity for each day of the following month in a form reasonably acceptable to Buyer. *** End of Appendix C *** Page 213 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2021-00175 – CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA January 5, 2022 Page 42 Appendix D – Description of the Facility Seller should complete the information below and attach a description of the Facility, including a summary of its significant components, a drawing showing the general arrangements of the Facility, and a single line diagram illustrating the interconnection of the Facility and loads with Buyer’s electric distribution system. Name of the Facility: Address of the Facility: Description of the Facility, including a summary of its significant components, such as for solar photovoltaic [Photovoltaic Modules, DC Collection System, Current Inverters], meteorological station, instrumentation and any other related electrical equipment: Drawing showing the general arrangement of the Facility: A single-line diagram illustrating the interconnection of the Facility with Buyer: A legal description of the Site, including a Site map: Longitude and latitude of the centroid of the Site: *** End of Appendix D *** Page 214 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2021-00175 – CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA January 5, 2022 Page 43 APPENDIX E – INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICT RENEWABLE PPA MILESTONES AND EXAMPLE ACTION STEPS Action Deadline Date Completed Responsible Party Step 1: Submit Application Seller Step 2: Approve Application Buyer Step 3: Sign Conditional PPA Both Step 4: Acquire Interconnection Agreement Seller Step 4A: Submit copy of Interconnection Agreement to Buyer Seller Step 5: Submit confirmation of RPS precertification requirement and provide Copy of precertification application to Buyer Seller Step 6: File Project with WREGIS and submit proof to Buyer. Seller Step 7: Pay Interconnection Fee and submit proof to Buyer. Seller Step 8: Acquire Conditional Use Permit and Construction Permits Seller Step 8A: Submit proof of permits to Buyer. Seller Step 9: Notify Buyer 10 days prior to construction start. Seller Step 10: Submit proof of insurance to Buyer. Seller Step 11: Mechanical Completion. Seller Step 12: Notify Buyer 30 days in advance of the Commercial Operation Date. Seller Step 12: Commercial Operation Date Seller Step 13: Submit application for certification to CEC. Seller *** End of Appendix E *** Page 215 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2021-00175 – CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA January 5, 2022 Page 44 Appendix F – Delivery Term Contract Quantity Schedule Dated: XXXXX XX, 20XX Delivery Term Contract Quantity Schedule Contract Year Contract Quantity (kWh/Yr) Phase Effective Date 1 Phase 1 XXXXX XX, 20XX 2 Phase 1 XXXXX XX, 20XX 3 Phase 1 XXXXX XX, 20XX 4 Phase 1 XXXXX XX, 20XX 5 Phase 1 XXXXX XX, 20XX 6 Phase 1 XXXXX XX, 20XX 7 Phase 1 XXXXX XX, 20XX 8 Phase 1 XXXXX XX, 20XX 9 Phase 1 XXXXX XX, 20XX 10 Phase 1 XXXXX XX, 20XX 11 Phase 1 XXXXX XX, 20XX 12 Phase 1 XXXXX XX, 20XX 13 Phase 1 XXXXX XX, 20XX 14 Phase 1 XXXXX XX, 20XX 15 Phase 1 XXXXX XX, 20XX 16 Phase 1 XXXXX XX, 20XX 17 Phase 1 XXXXX XX, 20XX 18 Phase 1 XXXXX XX, 20XX 19 Phase 1 XXXXX XX, 20XX 20 Phase 1 XXXXX XX, 20XX 21 Phase 1 XXXXX XX, 20XX 22 Phase 1 XXXXX XX, 20XX 23 Phase 1 XXXXX XX, 20XX 24 Phase 1 XXXXX XX, 20XX 25 Phase 1 XXXXX XX, 20XX *** End of Appendix F*** Page 216 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2021-00175 – CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA January 5, 2022 Page 45 Appendix G – Notices List Name: ______(“Seller”) Name: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a (“Buyer” or “RCMU”) All Notices: [Seller to complete] All Notices: Delivery Address: Delivery Address: Street: City: State: Zip: Mail Address: (if different from above) Mail Address: Attn: Attn: Phone: Phone: Facsimile: Facsimile: DUNS: DUNS: Federal Tax ID Number: Federal Tax ID Number: Invoices: Invoices: Attn: Attn: Phone: Phone: Facsimile: Facsimile: Payments: Payments: Attn: Attn: Phone: Phone: Facsimile: Facsimile: Wire Transfer: Wire Transfer: BNK: ABA: ACCT: BNK: ABA: ACCT: Credit and Collections: Credit and Collections: Attn: Attn: Phone: Phone: Facsimile: Facsimile: Page 217 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2021-00175 – CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA January 5, 2022 Page 46 With additional Notices of an Event of Default to Contract Manager: Contract Manager: Attn: Attn: Phone: Phone: Facsimile: *** End of Appendix G*** Page 218 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2021-00175 – CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA January 5, 2022 Page 47 Appendix H – FORM OF LETTER OF CREDIT Issuing Bank Letterhead and Address STANDBY LETTER OF CREDIT NO. XXXXXXXX Date: [insert issue date] Beneficiary: City of Rancho Cucamonga Applicant: [Insert name and address of Applicant] Attention: Letter of Credit Amount: [insert amount] Expiry Date: [insert expiry date] Ladies and Gentlemen: By order of [insert name of Applicant] (“Applicant”), we hereby issue in favor of City of Rancho Cucamonga (the “Beneficiary”) our irrevocable standby letter of credit No. [insert number of letter of credit] (“Letter of Credit”), for the account of Applicant, for drawings up to but not to exceed the aggregate sum of U.S. $ [insert amount in figures followed by (amount in words)] (“Letter of Credit Amount”). This Letter of Credit is available with [insert name of issuing bank, and the city and state in which it is located] by sight payment, at our offices located at the address stated below, effective immediately, and it will expire at our close of business on [insert expiry date] (the “Expiry Date”). Funds under this Letter of Credit are available to the Beneficiary against presentation of the following documents: 1. Beneficiary’s signed and dated sight draft in the form of Exhibit A hereto, referencing this Letter of Credit No. [insert number] and stating the amount of the demand; and 2. One of the following statements signed by an authorized representative or officer of Beneficiary: A. “Pursuant to the terms of that certain [insert name of the agreement] (the “Agreement”), dated [insert date of the Agreement], between Beneficiary and [insert name of Seller under the Page 219 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2021-00175 – CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA January 5, 2022 Page 48 Agreement], Beneficiary is entitled to draw under Letter of Credit No. [insert number] amounts owed by [insert name of Seller under the Agreement] under the Agreement; or B. “Letter of Credit No. [insert number] will expire in thirty (30) days or less and [insert name of Seller under the Agreement] has not provided replacement security acceptable to Beneficiary. Special Conditions: 1. Partial and multiple drawings under this Letter of Credit are allowed; 2. All banking charges associated with this Letter of Credit are for the account of the Applicant; 3. This Letter of Credit is not transferable; and 4. The Expiry Date of this Letter of Credit shall be automatically extended without a written amendment for a period of one year and on each successive Expiry Date, unless at least sixty (60) days before the then current Expiry Date, we notify you by registered mail or courier that we elect not to extend the Expiry Date of this Letter of Credit for such additional period. We engage with you that drafts drawn under and in compliance with the terms of this Letter of Credit will be duly honored upon presentation, on or before the Expiry Date (or after the Expiry Date as provided below), at our offices at [insert issuing bank’s address for drawings]. All demands for payment shall be made by presentation of originals or copies of documents; or by facsimile transmission of documents to [insert fax number], Attention: [insert name of issuing bank’s receiving department], with originals or copies of documents to follow by overnight mail. If presentation is made by facsimile transmission, you may contact us at [insert phone number] to confirm our receipt of the transmission. Your failure to seek such a telephone confirmation does not affect our obligation to honor such a presentation. Our payments against complying presentations under this Letter of Credit will be made no later than on the sixth (6th) banking day following a complying presentation. Except as stated herein, this Letter of Credit is not subject to any condition or qualification. It is our individual obligation, which is not contingent upon reimbursement and is not affected by any agreement, document, or instrument between us and the Applicant or between the Beneficiary and the Applicant or any other party. Except as otherwise specifically stated herein, this Letter of Credit is subject to and governed by the Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits, 2007 Revision, International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) Publication No. 600 (the “UCP 600”); provided that, if this Letter of Credit expires during an interruption of our business as described in Article 36 of the UCP 600, we will honor drafts presented in compliance with this Letter of Credit within thirty (30) days after the resumption of our business and effect payment accordingly. The law of the State of California shall apply to any matters not covered by the UCP 600. Page 220 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2021-00175 – CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA January 5, 2022 Page 49 For telephone assistance regarding this Letter of Credit, please contact us at [insert number and any other necessary details]. Very truly yours, [insert name of issuing bank] By: Authorized Signature Name: [print or type name] Title: *** End of Appendix H*** Page 221 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2021-00175 – CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA January 5, 2022 Page 50 Appendix I – FORM OF CONSENT TO ASSIGNMENT CONSENT AND AGREEMENT This CONSENT AND AGREEMENT (“Consent and Agreement”) is entered into as of [_______ __, 2___], between CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA (“RCMU”), and [_________________] , as collateral agent (in such capacity, “Financing Provider”), for the benefit of various financial institutions (collectively, the “Secured Parties”) providing financing to [_______] (“Seller”). RCMU, Seller, and the Financing Provider shall each individually be referred to as a “Party” and collectively as the “Parties”. Recitals A. Pursuant to that certain Power Purchase Agreement dated as of _____________, 2___ (as amended, modified, supplemented or restated from time to time, as including all related agreements, instruments and documents, collectively, the “Assigned Agreement”) between RCMU and Seller, RCMU has agreed to purchase energy from Seller. B. The Secured Parties have provided, or have agreed to provide, to Seller financing (including a financing lease) pursuant to one or more agreements (the “Financing Documents”), and require that Financing Provider be provided certain rights with respect to the “Assigned Agreement” and the “Assigned Agreement Accounts,” each as defined below, in connection with such financing. C. In consideration for the execution and delivery of the Assigned Agreement, RCMU has agreed to enter into this Consent and Agreement for the benefit of Seller. Agreement 1. Definitions. Any capitalized term used but not defined herein shall have the meaning specified for such term in the Assigned Agreement. 2. Consent. Subject to the terms and conditions below, RCMU consents to and approves the pledge and assignment by Seller to Financing Provider pursuant to the Loan Agreement and/or Security Agreement of (a) the Assigned Agreement, and (b) the accounts, revenues and proceeds of the Assigned Agreement (collectively, the “Assigned Agreement Accounts”). 3. Limitations on Assignment. Financing Provider acknowledges and confirms that, notwithstanding any provision to the contrary under applicable law or in any Financing Document executed by Seller, Financing Provider shall not assume, sell or otherwise dispose of the Assigned Agreement (whether by foreclosure sale, conveyance in lieu of foreclosure or otherwise) unless, on or before the date of any such assumption, sale or disposition, Financing Provider or any third party, as the case may be, assuming, purchasing or otherwise acquiring the Assigned Agreement (a) cures any Page 222 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2021-00175 – CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA January 5, 2022 Page 51 and all defaults of Seller under the Assigned Agreement which are capable of being cured and which are not personal to the Seller, (b) executes and delivers to RCMU a written assumption of all of Seller’s rights and obligations under the Assigned Agreement in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to RCMU, (c) otherwise satisfies and complies with all requirements of the Assigned Agreement, (d) provides such tax and enforceability assurance as RCMU may reasonably request, and (e) is a Permitted Transferee (as defined below). Financing Provider further acknowledges that the assignment of the Assigned Agreement and the Assigned Agreement Accounts is for security purposes only and that Financing Provider has no rights under the Assigned Agreement or the Assigned Agreement Accounts to enforce the provisions of the Assigned Agreement or the Assigned Agreement Accounts unless and until an event of default has occurred and is continuing under the Financing Documents between Seller and Financing Provider (a “Financing Default”), in which case Financing Provider shall be entitled to all of the rights and benefits and subject to all of the obligations which Seller then has or may have under the Assigned Agreement to the same extent and in the same manner as if Financing Provider were an original party to the Assigned Agreement. “Permitted Transferee” means any person or entity who is reasonably acceptable to RCMU. Financing Provider may from time to time, following the occurrence of a Financing Default, notify RCMU in writing of the identity of a proposed transferee of the Assigned Agreement, which proposed transferee may include Financing Provider, in connection with the enforcement of Financing Provider’s rights under the Financing Documents, and RCMU shall, within thirty (30) business days of its receipt of such written notice, confirm to Financing Provider whether or not such proposed transferee is a “Permitted Transferee” (together with a written statement of the reason(s) for any negative determination) it being understood that if RCMU shall fail to so respond within such thirty (30) business day period such proposed transferee shall be deemed to be a “Permitted Transferee”. 4. Cure Rights. (a) Notice to Financing Provider by RCMU. RCMU shall, concurrently with the delivery of any notice of an event of default under the Assigned Agreement (each, an “Event of Default”) to Seller (a “Default Notice”), provide a copy of such Default Notice to Financing Provider pursuant to Section 9(a) of this Consent and Agreement. In addition, Seller shall provide a copy of the Default Notice to Financing Provider the next business day after receipt from RCMU, independent of any agreement of RCMU to deliver such Default Notice. (b) Cure Period Available to Financing Provider Prior to Any Termination by RCMU. Upon the occurrence of an Event of Default, subject to (i) the expiration of the relevant cure periods provided to Seller under the Assigned Agreement, and (ii) Section 4(a) above, RCMU shall not terminate the Assigned Agreement unless it or Seller provides Financing Provider with notice of the Event of Default and affords Financing Provider an Additional Cure Period (as defined below) to cure such Event of Default. For purposes of this Agreement “Additional Cure Period” means (i) with respect to a monetary default, ten (10) days in addition to the cure period (if any) provided to Seller in the Assigned Agreement, and (ii) with respect to a non-monetary default, thirty (30) days in addition to the cure period (if any) provided to Seller in the Assigned Agreement. Page 223 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2021-00175 – CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA January 5, 2022 Page 52 (c) Failure by RCMU to Deliver Default Notice. If neither RCMU nor Seller delivers a Default Notice to Financing Provider as provided in Section 4(a), the Financing Provider’s applicable cure period shall begin on the date on which notice of an Event of Default is delivered to Financing Provider by either RCMU or Seller. Except for a delay in the commencement of the cure period for Financing Provider and a delay in RCMU’s ability to terminate the Assigned Agreement (in each case only if both RCMU and Seller fail to deliver notice of an Event of Default to Financing Provider), failure of RCMU to deliver any Default Notice shall not waive RCMU’s right to take any action under the Assigned Agreement and will not subject RCMU to any damages or liability for failure to provide such notice. (d) Extension for Foreclosure Proceedings. If possession of the Project (as defined in the Assigned Agreement) is necessary for Financing Provider to cure an Event of Default and Financing Provider commences foreclosure proceedings against Seller within thirty (30) days of receiving notice of an Event of Default from RCMU or Seller, whichever is received first, Financing Provider shall be allowed a reasonable additional period to complete such foreclosure proceedings, such period not to exceed ninety (90) days; provided, however, that Financing Provider shall provide a written notice to RCMU that it intends to commence foreclosure proceedings with respect to Seller within ten (10) business days of receiving a notice of such Event of Default from RCMU or Seller, whichever is received first. In the event Financing Provider succeeds to Seller’s interest in the Project as a result of foreclosure proceedings, the Financing Provider or a purchaser or grantee pursuant to such foreclosure shall be subject to the requirements of Section 3 of this Consent and Agreement. 5. Setoffs and Deductions. Each of Seller and Financing Provider agrees that RCMU shall have the right to set off or deduct from payments due to Seller each and every amount due RCMU from Seller whether or not arising out of or in connection with the Assigned Agreement. Financing Provider further agrees that it takes the assignment for security purposes of the Assigned Agreement and the Assigned Agreement Accounts subject to any defenses or causes of action RCMU may have against Seller. 6. No Representation or Warranty. Seller and Financing Provider each recognizes and acknowledges that RCMU makes no representation or warranty, express or implied, that Seller has any right, title, or interest in the Assigned Agreement or as to the priority of the assignment for security purposes of the Assigned Agreement or the Assigned Agreement Accounts. Financing Provider is responsible for satisfying itself as to the existence and extent of Seller’s right, title, and interest in the Assigned Agreement, and Financing Provider releases RCMU from any liability resulting from the assignment for security purposes of the Assigned Agreement and the Assigned Agreement Accounts. 7. Amendment to Assigned Agreement. Financing Provider acknowledges and agrees that RCMU may agree with Seller to modify or amend the Assigned Agreement, and that RCMU is not obligated to notify Financing Provider of any such amendment or modification to the Assigned Agreement. Financing Provider hereby releases RCMURCMU from all liability arising out of or in connection with the making of any amendment or modification to the Assigned Agreement. Page 224 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2021-00175 – CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA January 5, 2022 Page 53 8. Payments under Assigned Agreement. RCMU shall make all payments due to Seller under the Assigned Agreement from and after the date hereof to [__________], as depositary agent, to ABA No. [__________], Account No. [__________], and Seller hereby irrevocably consents to any and all such payments being made in such manner. Each of Seller, RCMU and Financing Provider agrees that each such payment by RCMU to such depositary agent of amounts due to Seller from RCMU under the Assigned Agreement shall satisfy RCMU’s corresponding payment obligation under the Assigned Agreement. 9. Miscellaneous. (a) Notices. All notices hereunder shall be in writing and shall be deemed received (i) at the close of business of the date of receipt, if delivered by hand or by facsimile or other electronic means, or (ii) when signed for by recipient, if sent registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, provided such notice was properly addressed to the appropriate address indicated on the signature page hereof or to such other address as a party may designate by prior written notice to the other parties, at the address set forth below: If to Financing Provider: Name: Address: Attn: Telephone: Facsimile: Email: If to RCMU: Name: Address: Attn: Telephone: Facsimile: Email: (b) No Assignment. This Consent and Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the successors and assigns of RCMU, and shall be binding on and inure to the benefit of Page 225 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2021-00175 – CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA January 5, 2022 Page 54 the Financing Provider, the Secured Parties and their respective successors and permitted transferees and assigns under the loan agreement and/or security agreement. (c) No Modification. This Consent and Agreement is neither a modification of nor an amendment to the Assigned Agreement. (d) Choice of Law. The parties hereto agree that this Consent and Agreement shall be construed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of California, excluding any choice of law rules which may direct the application of the laws of another jurisdiction. (e) No Waiver. No term, covenant or condition hereof shall be deemed waived and no breach excused unless such waiver or excuse shall be in writing and signed by the party claimed to have so waived or excused. (f) Counterparts. This Consent and Agreement may be executed in one or more duplicate counterparts, and when executed and delivered by all the parties listed below, shall constitute a single binding agreement. (g) No Third Party Beneficiaries. There are no third party beneficiaries to this Consent and Agreement. (h) Severability. The invalidity or unenforceability of any provision of this Consent and Agreement shall not affect the validity or enforceability of any other provision of this Consent and Agreement, which shall remain in full force and effect. (i) Amendments. This Consent and Agreement may be modified, amended, or rescinded only by writing expressly referring to this Consent and Agreement and signed by all parties hereto. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of RCMU and Financing Provider has duly executed this Consent and Agreement as of the date first written above. City of Rancho Cucamonga (RCMU) By: _________________________________ Name: _______________________________ Title: ________________________________ [_________________________________] (Financing Provider), as collateral agent Page 226 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2021-00175 – CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA January 5, 2022 Page 55 By: _________________________________ Name: _______________________________ Title: ________________________________ ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The undersigned hereby acknowledges the Consent and Agreement set forth above, makes the agreements set forth therein as applicable to Seller, including the obligation of Seller to provide a copy of any Default Notice it receives from RCMU to Financing Provider the next business day after receipt by Seller, and confirms that the Financing Provider identified above and the Secured Parties have provided or are providing financing to the undersigned. [________________________][name of Seller] By: _________________________________ Name: _______________________________ Title: ________________________________ *** End of Appendix I*** Page 227 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2021-00175 – CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA January 5, 2022 Page 56 EXHIBIT “F” RCMU Line Extension Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility Developer Responsibility Approximate location of stub out for developer constructed infrastructure from here to building POC/switch gear. Final location to be coordinated with City’s Etiwanda Grade Separation Project and RCMU. Developer constructed line extension including RCMU interconnection point and private infrastructure from line extension to building POC/switch gear for electrical and fiberoptic infrastructure Developer constructed infrastructure to include design and construction by developer of both electrical and fiberoptic communications infrastructure from stub out points shown above to the POC/switch gear and telecommunications room for each building. N Final design may include infrastructure within the County of San Bernardino’s jurisdiction. Developer to coordinate with the County and RCMU to obtain all necessary permits and rights-of-way to construct and maintain utility infrastructure outside of the City limits. Page 228 DATE:January 19, 2022 TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY:Tamara L. Oatman, Finance Director Minerva Gamboa, Business License Program Supervisor SUBJECT:Consideration of First Reading of Ordinance No. 995, to be Read by Title Only and Waive Further Reading, Amending Chapter 3.40 Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to Confirm That Short-Term Rentals are Subject to the City’s Transient Occupancy Tax, Further Clarify the Definition of Hotel and Transient Under the Chapter, Provide Regulations for Filing and Appeals Procedures, and Make Other Minor Amendments to the Chapter. (ORDINANCE NO. 995)(CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council introduce and conduct a First Reading of Ordinance No. 995, entitled “An Ordinance of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, Amending Chapter 3.40 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to Confirm that Short-Term Rentals Are Subject to the City’s Transient Occupancy Tax, Further Clarify the Definition of Hotel and Transient under the Chapter, Provide Regulations for Filing and Appeals Procedures, and Make Other Minor Amendments to the Chapter,” read by title only and waive further reading. BACKGROUND: In August 2020, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 969 allowing for short-term residential rentals (STRs) provided a short-term rental permit was obtained within permitted zones and owners complied with City regulations. The Ordinance also reiterated the requirement for STRs to collect and remit monthly Transient Occupancy Tax. An STR qualified as a “hotel” for purposes of the TOT ordinance because it is a dwelling intended to be occupied by transients for less than 30 consecutive days or less. Revisions to Chapter 3.40 of the RCMC were last made in 2014 through Ordinance No. 870 (Recodification). The City’s TOT rate of 10% was first put into place through Ordinance No. 197 and became effective July 1, 1983. The City has maintained this rate throughout the course of its history. In comparison, a few of our neighboring cities have implemented a higher rate – Ontario has a TOT rate of 11.75% and Chino Hills has a TOT rate of 12%. The proposed ordinance does not change or affect the City’s TOT rate or who it may be levied upon. ANALYSIS: While the TOT requirement has always applied to STRs, staff determined that our current RCMC Chapter 3.40 Transient Occupancy Tax should be updated to clarify the existing Ordinance and practices for the collection of TOT from STRs. The proposed draft ordinance expands the Page 229 Page 2 1 0 6 9 definition of “hotel” to specifically include short-term rentals, thus providing notice to STRs hosts in light of the recent STR Ordinance. Staff have also received questions about the applicability of the TOT to non-human transients, such as corporations. Included in the revised ordinance is a common sense clarification that a transient must be a human person. In addition to the above noted areas, the proposed TOT Ordinance includes other minor amendments to implement certain best practices in terms of TOT collection, such as identifying the Tax Administrator’s role in administering the tax and clarifying updates to the filings and appeals procedures. Many of these amendments were recommended by our TOT audit consultant to provide additional clarification to our Municipal Code to assist with future audits. The updated Municipal Code will facilitate a more precise and definitive approach to the application of our TOT to ensure the City is able to collect the correct amount of tax from applicable operators of hotels. This, in turn, will make our current TOT rate of 10% more sustainable and enable the City to effectively compete with neighboring cities for hotel business opportunities. The provisions of the revised Ordinance constitute restatements of existing law and/or address the administration of the TOT Ordinance, but do not affect the rate or scope of the TOT. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no direct fiscal impact by this action. Clarification of the City’s Municipal Code pertaining to TOT will facilitate better compliance by hotels and will assist in future TOT audits. COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: The clarification of the Municipal Code for the collection of TOT supports the City Council’s core value of providing and nurturing a high quality of life for all by demonstrating the active, prudent fiscal management of the City’s financial resources in order to support the various services the City provides to all Rancho Cucamonga stakeholders. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 – Ordinance No. 995 Page 230 Ordinance No. 995 – Page 1 of 8 ORDINANCE NO. 995 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 3.40 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE TO CONFIRM THAT SHORT- TERM RENTALS ARE SUBJECT TO THE CITY’S TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAX, FURTHER CLARIFY THE DEFINITION OF HOTEL AND TRANSIENT UNDER THE CHAPTER, PROVIDE REGULATIONS FOR FILING AND APPEALS PROCEDURES, AND MAKE OTHER MINOR AMENDMENTS TO THE CHAPTER A. Recitals. 1. In August 2020, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 969 allowing for short-term residential rentals (STRs), provided a short-term rental permit was obtained within permitted zones and owners complied with City regulations. The Ordinance also reiterated the requirement for STRs to collect and remit monthly Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) because such rentals qualify as a “hotel” under the existing TOT ordinance. 2. The City’s Finance Department has also received questions about the applicability of the TOT to non-human transients, such as corporations, and the City Council desires to provide a common sense clarification that a transient must be a human person. 3. The City Council also desires to make other minor amendments to the TOT ordinance in order to implement certain best practices in terms of TOT collection, such as identifying the Tax Administrator’s role in administering the tax and clarifying updates to the filing and appeals procedures. 4. The provisions of this ordinance constitute restatements of existing law and/or address the administration of the TOT ordinance, but do not affect the rate or scope of the TOT. 5. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows: SECTION 1. Chapter 3.40 (Transient Occupancy Tax) of Title 3 (Revenue and Finance) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows: “Chapter 3.40 TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAX 3.40.010 Definitions. 3.40.020 Imposition of tax. 3.40.030 Exemptions 3.40.040 Allowance for collection costs. 3.40.050 Collection by operators. 3.40.060 Registration of hotel operators; issuance and contents of registration certificate. 3.40.070 Filing of report and remittance of tax collected. 3.40.080 Penalties for delinquent payment. 3.40.090 Cessation of business. ATTACHMENT 1 Page 231 Ordinance No. 995 – Page 2 of 8 3.40.100 Determination of tax by director of finance upon failure of operator to collect and report. 3.40.110 Appeals. 3.40.111 Records to be kept for three years. 3.40.112 Enforcement. 3.40.113 Disbursement. 3.40.114 Violations. 3.40.115 Effective date. 3.40.010 Definitions. Except where the context otherwise requires, the definitions given in this section govern the construction of this chapter: Hotel means any structure, or any portion of any structure, which is occupied or intended or designed for occupancy by transients for dwelling, lodging or sleeping purposes, and includes any hotel, inn, tourist home or house, motel, studio hotel, bachelor hotel, lodginghouse, roominghouse, apartment house, dormitory, public or private club, mobilehome or house trailer at a fixed location, short-term rental (as defined in chapter 8.34), or other similar structure or portion thereof. Occupancy means the use or possession, or the right or entitlement to the use or possession, of any hotel room, rooms or portion thereof, in any hotel for dwelling, lodging or sleeping purposes. Operator means a person who is proprietor of the hotel, whether in the capacity of owner, lessee, sub-lessee, mortgagee in possession, licensee or any other capacity. Where the operator performs his or her functions through a managing agent of any type or character other than an employee, the managing agent shall also be deemed an operator for the purposes of this chapter and shall have the same duties and liabilities as his or her principal. Compliance with the provisions of this chapter by either the principal or the managing agent shall, however, be considered to be compliance by both. Person means any individual, firm, partnership, joint venture, association, social club, fraternal organization, joint stock company, corporation, estate, trust, business trust, receiver, trustee, syndicate, or any other group or combination acting as a unit. Rent means the consideration charged, whether or not received, for the occupancy of space in a hotel valued in money, whether to be received in money, goods, labor or otherwise, including all receipts, cash, credits and property and services of any kind or nature, without any deduction therefrom whatsoever. Tax means the tax imposed by this ordinance. Tax Administrator means the Director of Finance or his or her designee. The Tax Administrator is charged with interpreting the provisions of this chapter. Transient means any human person who exercises occupancy or is entitled to occupancy by reason of concession, permit, right of access, license or other agreement for a period of 30 consecutive calendar days or less, counting portions of calendar days as full days. Any such person so occupying space in a hotel shall be deemed to be a transient until the period of 30 days has expired, unless there is an agreement in writing between the operator and the occupant providing for a longer period of occupancy. In determining whether a person is a transient, uninterrupted periods of time extending both prior and subsequent to the effective date of the ordinance codified in this chapter may be considered. Page 232 Ordinance No. 995 – Page 3 of 8 3.40.020 Imposition of tax. A. For the privilege of occupancy in any hotel, each transient is subject to and shall pay a tax in the amount of ten percent of the rent charged by the operator. Said tax constitutes a debt owed by the transient to the city which is extinguished only by payment to the operator or to the city. The transient shall pay the tax to the operator of the hotel at the time the rent is paid. If the rent is paid in installments, a proportionate share of the tax shall be paid with each installment. The unpaid tax shall be due upon the transient’s ceasing to occupy space in the hotel. If for any reason the tax due is not paid to the operator of the hotel, the Tax Administrator may require that such tax shall be paid directly to the city. 3.40.030 Exemptions. No tax shall be imposed upon: A. Any officer or employee of a foreign government who is exempt by reason of express provision of federal law or international treaty. B. Any federal or state officer or employee when on official business. C. Any other person at whom, or any occupancy as to which, it is beyond the power of the City to impose the tax provided for in this chapter. D. Any amount subject to tax under the Sales and Use Tax Law (commencing with Revenue and Taxation Code § 6001) with respect to the sale of food products. For purposes of this subsection, the term “food products” means food and beverage products of every kind, regardless of how or where served, and shall specifically include, but not be limited to, alcoholic beverages and carbonated beverages of every kind. Except for Subsection D above, no exemptions shall be granted except upon a claim therefor made at the time the rent is collected and under penalty of perjury upon a form prescribed by the Tax Administrator. 3.40.040 Allowance for collection costs. From the full amount of the tax collected and transmitted to the director of finance pursuant to this chapter, each operator may deduct and retain as for his or her administrative expense in the collection of said tax, an amount equal to four percent of the total tax to be paid. 3.40.040 Collection by operators. Each operator shall collect the tax imposed by this chapter to the same extent and at the same time as the rent is collected from every transient. The amount of tax shall be separately stated from the amount of the rent charged, and each transient shall receive a receipt for payment from the operator. No operator of a hotel shall advertise or state in any manner, whether directly or indirectly, that the tax or any part thereof will be assumed or absorbed by the operator, or that it will not be added to the rent, or that, if added, any part will be refunded, except in the manner hereinafter provided. Page 233 Ordinance No. 995 – Page 4 of 8 3.40.050 Registration of hotel operators; issuance and contents of registration certificate. Within 30 days after commencing business, each operator of any hotel renting occupancy to transients shall register said hotel with the director of finance and obtain from him or her a transient occupancy registration certificate to be at all times posted in a conspicuous place on the premises. Every application for such a certificate shall be made upon a form prescribed by the Tax Administrator and shall set forth the name under which the operator transacts or intends to transact business, the location of the place of business and such other information as the Tax Administrator may require. The application shall be signed by the owner of the hotel if a natural person; by a member or partner, if association or partnership; by an executive officer or some person specifically authorized by the corporation to sign the application, if a corporation. The transient occupancy registration certificate must be in effect at all times while the business is in operation and shall be at all times posted in a conspicuous place on the hotel premises. Said certificate shall, among other things, state the following: A. The name of the hotel; B. The name of the operator; C. The address of the hotel; and D. The day upon which the certificate was issued; E. “This transient occupancy registration certificate signifies that the person named on the face hereof has fulfilled the requirements of the uniform Transient Occupancy Tax Ordinance by registering with the Tax Administrator for the purpose of collecting from transients the Transient Occupancy Tax and remitting said tax to the Tax Administrator. This certificate does not authorize any person to conduct any unlawful business or to conduct any lawful business in an unlawful manner, nor to operate a hotel without strictly complying with all local applicable laws, including but not limited to those requiring a permit from any board, commission, department or office of this city. This certificate does not constitute a permit and does not apply in lieu of such other permits which are otherwise required to operate.” 3.40.060 Filing of report and remittance of tax collected Each operator shall, on or before the last day of the month following the close of each month, or at the close of any shorter reporting period which may be established by the Tax Administrator, make a return to the Tax Administrator, on forms provided by him/her, of the total rents charged and received and the amount of tax collected from transient occupancies. Each such return shall contain a declaration under penalty of perjury, executed by the operator or its authorized agent, that to the best of the signatory’s knowledge, the statements in the return are true, correct and complete. At the time the return is filed, the full amount of the tax collected shall be remitted to the Tax Administrator. Amounts claimed on the return as exempt from the tax pursuant to Section 3.40.030 shall be fully itemized and explained on the return or supporting schedule. At the time the return is filed, the tax fixed at the prevailing tax rate for the amount of occupancies charged or chargeable, which are not exempt from tax under Section 3.40.030, shall be remitted to the Tax Administrator. The Tax Administrator may establish shorter reporting periods for any certificate holder if he or she deems it necessary in order to ensure collection of the tax and he or she may require further information on the return. Returns and payments are due immediately upon cessation of business for any reason. All taxes collected by operators pursuant to this Page 234 Ordinance No. 995 – Page 5 of 8 chapter shall be held in trust for the account of the city until payment thereof is made to the Tax Administrator. 3.40.070 Penalties for delinquent payment. A.Original delinquency. Any operator who fails to remit any tax imposed by this chapter within the time required shall pay a penalty of ten percent of the amount of the tax in addition to the amount of the tax. B.Continued delinquency. Any operator who fails to remit any delinquent remittance on or before a period of 30 days following the date on which the remittance first became delinquent shall pay a second delinquency penalty of ten percent of the amount of the tax, in addition to the amount of the tax and the ten percent penalty first imposed. C.Fraud. If the Tax Administrator determines that the nonpayment of any remittance due under this chapter is due to fraud, a penalty of 25 percent of the amount of the tax shall be added thereto, in addition to the penalties stated in subsections A and B of this section. D.Interest. In addition to the penalties imposed, any operator who fails to remit any tax imposed by this chapter shall pay interest at the rate of one percent per month, or fraction thereof, on the amount of the tax, exclusive of penalties from the date on which the remittance first became delinquent until paid. E.Penalties merged with tax. Every penalty imposed and such interest as accrues under the provisions of this section shall become a part of the tax herein required to be paid. 3.40.080 Determination of tax by Tax Administrator upon failure of operator to collect and report. If any operator shall fail or refuse to collect said tax and to make, within the time provided in this chapter, any report and remittance of said tax or portion thereof required by this chapter, the Tax Administrator shall proceed in such manner as he or she may deem best to obtain facts and information on which to base his estimate of the tax due. As soon as the Tax Administrator procures such facts and information as he or she is able to obtain, upon which to base the assessment of any tax imposed by this chapter and payable by any operator who has failed or refused to collect the same, and to make such report and remittance, he or she shall proceed to determine and assess against such operator the tax, interest and penalties provided for by this chapter. In case such determination is made, the Tax Administrator shall give a notice of the amount so assessed by serving it personally or by depositing it in the United States mail, addressed to the operator so assessed, at his or her last known address. Such operator may, within ten days after the serving or mailing of such notice, make application in writing to the Tax Administrator for a hearing on the amount assessed. If the application by the operator for a hearing is not made within the time prescribed, the tax, interest and penalties, if any, determined by the Tax Administrator shall become final and conclusive and immediately due and payable. If such application is made, the Tax Administrator shall give not less than five days’ written notice in the manner prescribed herein to the operator to show cause at a time and place fixed in said notice why said amount specified therein should not be fixed for such tax, interest and penalties. At such hearing, the operator may appear and offer evidence why such specified tax, interest and penalties should not be so fixed. After such hearing the Tax Administrator shall determine the proper tax to be remitted and shall thereafter give written notice to the person in the manner prescribed herein of such determination and the amount of such tax, interest and penalties. The Page 235 Ordinance No. 995 – Page 6 of 8 amount determined to be due shall be payable after fifteen days unless an appeal is taken as provided in section 3.40.090. 3.40.090 Cessation of business. Each operator shall notify the Tax Administrator, ten days prior to the sale or cessation of business of a hotel for any reason and returns and remittances are due immediately upon the sale or cessation of business. 3.40.100 Appeals. Any operator aggrieved by any decision of the Tax Administrator with respect to the amount of such tax, interest and penalties, if any, may appeal to the City Manager, or his or her designee, by filing notice of appeal with the City Clerk within 15 days of the serving or mailing of the determination of tax due. The appellant shall pay a non-refundable fee in an amount established by resolution of the City Council for such appeal. The City Clerk shall schedule an appeal hearing with the City Manager or designee within 15 days of an appeal being filed. The City Clerk shall give notice in writing to such operator at his or her last known place of address. The decision of the City Manager or his or her designee shall contain factual findings and legal conclusions which support the decisions and shall be final and shall be served upon the appellant in the manner prescribed above for service of notice of hearing. Any amount found to be due shall be immediately due and payable upon the service of notice. 3.40.110 Records to be kept for three years. It shall be the duty of every operator liable for the collection and payment to the city of any tax imposed by this chapter to keep and preserve, in the city, for a period of three years, all records as may be necessary to determine the amount of such tax as he or she may have been liable for the collection of and payment to the city, which records the Tax Administrator shall have right to inspect at all reasonable times. Such records shall be made available to the Tax Administrator or designee at all reasonable times to conduct audits for verification of the tax liability. The Tax Administrator may subpoena the records or use any other lawful method required to inspect the records if any operator refuses to make them available for examination upon request. If the above records are not provided by the hotel operator or are deemed incomplete or unacceptable by the Tax Administrator, a determination of the taxes, penalties, and interest due will be made by the Tax Administrator in the manner specified in Section 3.40.080. 3.40.110 Enforcement. Any tax required to be paid by any transient under the provisions of this chapter shall be deemed a debt owed by the transient to the city. Any such tax collected by an operator which has not been paid to the city shall be deemed a debt owed by the operator to the city. Any person owing money to the city under the provisions of this chapter shall be liable to an action brought in the name of the city for the recovery of such amount. Except in the case of fraud or the failure of a property owner to file a transient occupancy tax return, the city may institute an action to collect unpaid transient occupancy taxes within four years of the date on which the transient occupancy taxes were required to be paid. If the Tax Administrator determines that the failure to make any remittance or payment due under this chapter is due to fraud, the violation shall be punishable pursuant to Section 3.40.130. Page 236 Ordinance No. 995 – Page 7 of 8 3.40.120 Disbursement. All moneys received by the city from the collection of transient occupancy tax shall be paid into the general fund. 3.40.130 Violations. Any operator or other person violating any provisions of this chapter shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be punishable therefor by a fine of not more than $500.00, or by imprisonment in the county jail for a period of not more than six months, or by both such fine and imprisonment. Any operator or other person who fails or refuses to register as required by this chapter or to furnish any return required to be made, or who fails or refuses to furnish a supplemental return or other data required by the Tax Administrator, or who renders a false or fraudulent return or claim is guilty of a misdemeanor and is punishable as aforesaid. Any person required to make, render, submit or verify any report or claim who makes any false or fraudulent report or claim with intent to defeat or evade the determination of any amount due required by this chapter to be made, is guilty of a misdemeanor and is punishable as aforesaid. 3.40.140 Effective Date. The tax imposed by this chapter became operative on July 1, 1983.” SECTION 2. If any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase in this Ordinance or any part thereof is for any reason held to be unconstitutional, invalid, or ineffective by any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity or effectiveness of the remaining portions of this Ordinance or any part thereof. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed each section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared unconstitutional, invalid, or ineffective. SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published in the manner prescribed by law. Page 237 Ordinance No. 995 – Page 8 of 8 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this _____ day of ______________, 2022. _____________________________________ L. Dennis Michael Mayor I, JANICE REYNOLDS, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the _____ day of _______________, 2022, and was finally passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the ______ day of ______________, 2022, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCILMEMBERS: ATTEST:______________________________ City Clerk Page 238 DATE:January 19, 2022 TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY:Sean McPherson, AICP, Senior Planner SUBJECT:Discussion, Consideration and Possible Action to Introduce, Waive Reading of and Adopt by a Four-fifths Vote, for a Period of 45 Days, an Urgency Ordinance to Establish Objective Zoning And Subdivision Standards for Senate Bill 9 Projects in Single-Family Residential Zones, Declaring The Urgency Thereof and Making a Determination of Exemption Under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). (URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. 994) (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Urgency Ordinance No. 994 entitled “An Urgency Zoning Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Enacted Pursuant to Government Code Section 65858 Establishing Interim Development Standards for SB 9 Development, Declaring the Urgency Thereof and Making A Determination of Exemption Under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA),” by four-fifths vote, waive full reading, and read by title only. BACKGROUND: Government Code Section 65858 provides, “Without following the procedures otherwise required prior to the adoption of a zoning ordinance, the legislative body of a…city…to protect the public safety, health, and welfare, may adopt as an urgency measure an interim ordinance prohibiting any uses that may be in conflict with a contemplated General Plan, Specific Plan, or Zoning proposal that the legislative body, Planning Commission or the Planning Department is considering or studying or intends to study within a reasonable time. That urgency measure shall require a four-fifths vote of the legislative body for adoption. The interim ordinance shall be of no further force and effect 45 days from its date of adoption. After notice pursuant to Section 65090 and public hearing, the legislative body may extend the interim ordinance for 10 months and 15 days and subsequently extend the interim ordinance for one year. Any extension shall also require a four-fifths vote for adoption. Not more than two extensions may be adopted.” In response to the housing shortage and affordability crisis, on September 16, 2021, Governor Gavin Newsom signed into law Senate Bill (SB) 9. SB 9, which took effect January 1, 2022, requiring the ministerial review of two types of development applications within single-family residential zones: two lot subdivisions (known as “Urban Lot Splits”), and residential development projects of up to 2 units per lot (“Two- Unit Projects”), subject to certain qualifying criteria. Because SB 9 requires that these applications be approved on a ministerial basis, the City cannot hold public hearings or consider subjective factors, such as aesthetics and neighborhood character, Page 239 Page 2 1 0 9 6 for qualifying applications which meet basic criteria. In short, this legislation makes it possible in some instances for there to be up to 4 units constructed on a single-family zoned lot where only one single family residence previously existed, inclusive of Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU) and Junior Accessory Dwelling Units (JADU). Preliminary research by staff indicates that approximately 25,000 single-family zoned parcels within the City may be eligible for further development under SB 9. Considering the number of parcels which may be eligible for development under SB 9, and especially considering any impact this new development may have upon the City, staff is currently exploring potential regulations which may be implemented in order to ensure that SB 9 is implemented in an appropriate and legally defensible manner that carefully considers public health, safety and welfare in the City. ANALYSIS: Development under SB 9 could have the potential to cause specific adverse impacts, such as additional traffic which could exacerbate existing access and emergency response constraints within certain neighborhoods where access, circulation and parking may be deficient or limited (i.e., dead-end streets within Very High Fire Severity Zones, neighborhoods where roads do not meet minimum width standards, etc.). SB 9 could also impact the availability of services in existing single-family residential neighborhoods by facilitating the creation of lots and construction of units which are inconsistent with utilities in existing single-family residential neighborhoods. Finally, SB 9 could have the unintended effect of reducing affordability of units within single-family neighborhoods if such units are not reserved for low-income tenants or the developments are too large so as not to be affordable. It is critical that the City prevent any public health and safety impacts that may arise under this new requirement. Maintaining the quality, livability and safety of existing single-family residential neighborhoods throughout the City is a critically important community objective, as evidenced by goals set forth in the City’s General Plan. Consequently, implementing SB 9 regulations without considering local context could negatively affect the health, safety and welfare of the public within the City. To address such concerns, on December 1, 2021, the City Council discussed certain policy and development code considerations which included: Consider objective standards for zoning and subdivisions to ensure that SB 9 development does not adversely impact existing single-family residential neighborhoods; Consider studying areas of historic significance to determine if further protections are appropriate; Consider implementing additional regulations related to SB 9 to maintain the public health, safety and welfare within Very High Fire Severity Zones; Consider the impact further SB 9 development may have on utility capacity within certain neighborhoods; Consider how the development of SB 9 units may allow the City to achieve the important local and statewide goals of increasing the availability of affordable housing. Following that City Council meeting, staff continues researching these various policy and development code considerations and intends to return to the Council within the first quarter of 2022 with comprehensive Development Code Amendments. As SB 9 is now effective (as of January 1, 2022), and in order to prevent any adverse impacts to public health, safety and welfare, staff recommends that the City Council adopt the subject urgency ordinance which is attached to this report and which establishes interim standards while staff continues to work on permanent development code amendments to address the policy considerations referenced above. Page 240 Page 3 1 0 9 6 SB 9 permits the City to enforce objective zoning, subdivision, and design standards on SB 9 project. In summary, the proposed interim regulations would do the following: Limits the application of SB 9 to single-family residential zones, which are: Very Low Residential (VL), Low Residential (L), and Hillside Residential (HR). A maximum unit size of 800 square feet, which may be increased to 1,200 square feet if at least one of the units on the lot is reserved for rentals to very-low income households; Limits new units to one-story and 16 feet in height; Requires the Fire Marshall, City Engineer, and Building Official to review SB 9 projects to determine whether a particular project could cause a specific, adverse impact to public health and safety for which there is no feasible mitigation; and Other objective design criteria intended to help prevent unintended impacts of SB 9 projects on existing single-family neighborhoods. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65858, the initial term of the urgency ordinance is 45 days (expiring on March 5, 2022). In the event that staff determines that a permanent development code amendment may not be prepared by the expiration of the urgency ordinance, staff may bring a further ordinance to extend the term of the urgency ordinance for up to 10 months, 15 days prior to the initial expiration date. Ten days before the proposed extension, the City Council will consider a report identifying the steps taken by staff to address these issues during the urgency ordinance’s moratorium’s initial term. This ordinance is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act as an ordinance intended to implement SB 9. FISCAL IMPACT: None COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: Enacting an urgency ordinance in an effort to maintain the public health, safety and welfare or the community achieves multiple City Council “Core Values,” including: Providing and nurturing a high quality of life for all; Promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community for all; Intentionally embracing and anticipating the future. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 – Draft Urgency Ordinance No. 994 Page 241 Urgency Ordinance No. 994 - Page 1 of 10 1 9 9 6 URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. 994 AN URGENCY ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO ESTABLISH OBJECTIVE ZONING AND SUBDIVISION STANDARDS FOR SENATE BILL 9 PROJECTS IN SINGLE- FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONES, DECLARING THE URGENCY THEREOF AND MAKING A DETERMINATION OF EXEMPTION UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1.Legislative Findings. On September 16, 2021, Governor Newsom approved Senate Bill (“SB”) 9 to amend the Planning and Zoning Law and the Subdivision Map Act effective January 1, 2022. A.SB 9 amended Government Code Section 66452.6 and added Sections 65852.21 and 66411.7 of Chapter 162, and took effect on January 1, 2022. B.SB 9 generally requires cities and counties to ministerially approve two-unit housing developments and parcel maps to create urban lot splits on lots within single- family residential zones. C.SB 9 authorizes the City to enforce objective zoning, subdivision, and design standards. D.SB 9 projects will have the potential to significantly impact the character of the City’s established residential neighborhoods. E.SB 9 projects have the potential to impact the health, safety, and welfare of residents in the City, particularly those residing in single-family residential neighborhoods, vehicular and pedestrian safety, on-street parking demand, and housing affordability. In addition, the potential increase to residential density in areas of the City designed for single-family development may cause increased demand on utilities and access routes that were not designed for such density. As a result, the City Council finds that there is an immediate need to establish objective zoning and subdivision standards for SB 9 projects in order to protect the public health, safety, and welfare while it studies permanent land use regulations for such projects and to ensure SB 9 does not have a detrimental impact on single-family residential neighborhoods within the City. F.The City intends to study and develop permanent land use regulations for the implementation of SB 9 projects in the city. Given that SB 9 took effect on January 1, ATTACHMENT 1 Page 242 Urgency Ordinance No. 994 - Page 2 of 10 1 9 9 6 2022, the City will not be able to complete the process of developing and adopting such permanent regulations prior to SB 9 taking effect. Thus, the City Council desires to adopt an interim urgency ordinance that will take effect immediately in order to ensure that SB 9 projects do not unreasonably impact the character of single-family residential neighborhoods or threaten public health, safety, or welfare while permanent regulations are studies and prepared. G.It is well documented that California is experiencing a housing supply crisis, with housing demand far outstripping supply. The housing crisis has particularly exacerbated the need for affordable homes at prices below market rates. The City has a regional housing need between 2021 and 2029 to construct 3,245 extremely low/very low-income units, 1,920 low-income units, and 2,031 moderate income units (Housing Element 2021-2029, Table HE-47, Page 72). According to the City’s recently-adopted Housing Element, the City still needs to construct 3,209 extremely low/very low-income units and 1,864 low-income units during the sixth housing cycle. H.To help address this affordability crisis, the City Council finds that limiting the size of units developed pursuant to SB 9 and requiring that some units be affordable are important interim regulations to protect public welfare and to prevent SB 9 developments from conflicting with forthcoming permanent land use regulations. I.The purpose of this Ordinance is to establish objective zoning, subdivision, and design standards for housing developments undertaken pursuant to SB 9. SECTION 2.Authority. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65858, the City Council may adopt, as an urgency measure, an interim ordinance that prohibits any uses that may be in conflict with a contemplated zoning proposal that the City Council is considering, studying, or intends to study within a reasonable period of time. SECTION 3.Urgency Declaration and Findings. The City Council finds and determines that there is an immediate threat to the public health, safety, or welfare caused by SB 9 projects, which threat will significantly limit the City’s ability to preserve community character, affordability, and environmental and public health and safety. As described in Section 1 of this Interim Urgency Ordinance, the staff report accompanying this Interim Urgency Ordinance, and other evidence in the record, such development in the City could threaten the health, safety and welfare of the community through negative impacts that include, but are not limited to, emergency access during emergencies, appropriate sizing for utilities and streets, parking, and housing affordability. The City Council finds and determines that there is an immediate threat to public health, safety, or welfare if the City does not have enforceable zoning, subdivision, and Page 243 Urgency Ordinance No. 994 - Page 3 of 10 1 9 9 6 design standards for such projects. Therefore, it is necessary that this Interim Urgency Ordinance take effect immediately upon adoption. SECTION 4.Prohibition on SB 9 Projects that Fail to Comply with this Interim Urgency Ordinance. Based on the facts and findings set forth in Sections 1 through 3 of this Interim Urgency Ordinance, and notwithstanding any other ordinance or provision of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, residential development projects and urban lot splits proposed pursuant to Senate Bill 9, are prohibited unless the project complies with the requirements of Sections 5 and 6 of this Interim Urgency Ordinance. SECTION 5. Development in Single-Family Residential Zones. A. Purpose. This Section provides objective zoning and design standards for the development of residential units pursuant to SB 9. Development pursuant to this Section does not require discretionary review or a hearing and is processed ministerially through a plan check/zoning clearance. B. Applicability. SB 9 projects shall only be developed in single-family residential zones. For purposes of this Section, the following zones are considered single- family residential zones: Very Low Residential (VL), Low Residential (L), and Hillside Residential (HR). C. General Standards. All development pursuant to SB 9 shall comply with the following objective standards: 1.Eligibility requirements of Government Code Section 65852.21(a) shall be satisfied. 2.Except where superseded by SB 9 or this Section, development shall comply with the objective development standards of the zone in which the lot is located. 3.Access to any unit shall not be across an easement that restricts such access. 4.More than 25 percent of the exterior structural walls of an existing dwelling shall not be demolished unless the site has not been occupied by a tenant in the last three years. 5.The lot shall contain no more than one pedestrian path connected to the public right-of-way or private street. 6.The development shall contain no exterior stairways except those leading from grade to the first floor. Page 244 Urgency Ordinance No. 994 - Page 4 of 10 1 9 9 6 7.Off-street parking shall be provided in accordance with the following standards: a.A minimum of one off-street parking space shall be provided for each residential unit. b.No off-street parking is required if either of the following apply: i.The lot is located within one-half mile walking distance of either: a high-quality transit corridor as defined in Public Resources Code Section 21155(b) or a major transit stop as defined in Public Resources Code Section 21064.3. ii.A car-share vehicle is located within one block of the lot. D. Additional Standards for New Construction. In addition to the standards of Subsection C, the standards of this Subsection apply if one or both residential units are new construction: 1.Maximum unit size shall be 800 square feet, except when rented at a level affordable to Low-Income (50%-80% of AMI) households, per Subsection J.5 below, the maximum unit size may be up to 1,200 sqaure feet. 2.No residential unit shall exceed a building height of one story. 3.No residential unit shall exceed a building height of 16 feet. 4.Each residential unit shall have a minimum setback of four feet from side and rear property lines except as allowed by Government Code Section 65852.21. 5.If the residential units are built as separate buildings, the following standards shall apply. a.The buildings shall be located one in front of the other in relation to the street. b.The front building shall be at least as wide and as tall as the rear building. c.The front building shall be positioned such that the rear building is not visible from the street when viewed from directly in front of the property. Page 245 Urgency Ordinance No. 994 - Page 5 of 10 1 9 9 6 6.If the residential units are built as a single building, one residential unit shall have a door facing the street and one residential unit shall have a door facing a side or rear property line. E. Additional Standards for Conversion of an Existing Dwelling. In addition to the standards of Subsection C, the standards of this Subsection apply if an existing dwelling will be fully or partially retained: 1.Maximum unit size shall be 800 square feet, except when rented at a level affordable to Low-Income (50%-80% of AMI) households, per Subsection J.5. below, the maximum unit size may be up to 1,200 square feet. 2.The existing setbacks shall be maintained when converting or substantially redeveloping an existing structure to a two-unit residential development, except that additions to the existing dwelling shall have a minimum setback of four feet from side and rear property lines. 3.Additions to the existing dwelling shall not increase the building height beyond the allowable maximum of the respective base zoning district. 4.If two residential units are located in the same building, one residential unit shall have a door facing the street and one residential unit shall have a door facing a side or rear property line. F. Additional Standards for Urban Lot Split Projects. In addition to the standards of Subsections C, D, and E as applicable, the standards of this Subsection apply if the residential units will be located on lots created by an urban lot split. 1.Each lot created by the parcel map shall be used solely for residential uses. 2.No lot created by the parcel map shall have more than two residential units, inclusive of any accessory dwelling unit (ADU) or junior accessory dwelling unit (JADU). No ADU or JADU shall be allowed on any parcel created by an urban lot split if the subdivider uses the authority provided under Government Code Section 65852.21. 3.If the boundary line between the lots created by the parcel map is perpendicular to the front lot line, the units shall be subject to the following standards: a.The buildings nearest the street on each lot created by the parcel map shall have no more than one residential unit with a door facing the street. Page 246 Urgency Ordinance No. 994 - Page 6 of 10 1 9 9 6 G. Exceptions. The Planning Director shall approve an exception to any of the standards specified in this Section upon determining that complying with the standard would physically preclude the construction of up to two residential units or would physically preclude either of the two residential units from being 800 square feet in floor area. H. Review. The Building Official, City Engineer, and Fire Marshal shall review applications to determine whether a proposed development would cause a specific adverse effect to public health, safety, and welfare, as defined in Government Code Section 65589.5. If so, the Building Official shall make a written finding in support of his or her decision to deny the application. I. Denial. The Building Official shall deny an application for an SB 9 project upon making both of the following findings in writing based upon a preponderance of evidence: 1.The proposed housing development project would have a specific, adverse impact upon the public health and safety or the physical environment as defined and determined in Government Code Section 65589.5(d)(2). 2.There is no feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the specific, adverse impact. J. Income Restriction. If more than one unit is developed on a single lot, the second unit may be up to 1,200 square feet if one of the units is rented at a level affordable to Low-Income (50%-80% of AMI) households, provided that the property owner must execute and record against the subject property an affordability covenant provided by the Planning Director per Subsection K below. K. Covenants Required. A property owner seeking to develop units on a single-family residential property, pursuant to the standards of SB 9 and the standards of this Section, shall execute and record the following covenants against the subject property with the San Bernardino County Assessor-Recorder-Clerk and provide a copy to the City: 1.Short-Term Rental of a residential unit for a period less than 31 days shall be prohibited; 2.Non-residential uses on the site shall be prohibited; 3.Any subsequent urban lot split of land that was previously subdivided with an urban lot split shall be prohibited; 4.The owner of the property for which an urban lot split is proposed shall sign an affidavit stating that the owner intends to occupy one of the housing Page 247 Urgency Ordinance No. 994 - Page 7 of 10 1 9 9 6 units as their principal residence for at least three years from the date of the approval of the urban lot split; and 5.Residential units over 800 square feet, created pursuant to the standards of this Section, shall be rented at a level affordable to Low-Income (50%- 80% AMI) households for a period of at least 45 years. SECTION 6.Urban Lot Splits in Single-Family Residential Zones. A. Purpose. This Section provides objective subdivision standards for urban lot splits on single-family residential zone lots pursuant to SB 9. B. Applicability 1.This Section applies to single-family residential zone lots. For the purposes of this Section, the following zones are considered single-family residential zones: Very Low Residential (VL), Low Residential (L), and Hillside Residential (HR). 2. An urban lot split is prohibited on a lot previously subdivided by an urban lot split pursuant to SB 9. In addition, an urban lot split is prohibited on a lot if the lot’s owner or any person acting in concert with the owner of such lot has previously subdivided an adjacent lot pursuant to SB 9. 3. An urban lot split shall not require discretionary review or a hearing and is approved ministerially by the City Engineer through a parcel map application. This Section is exempt from the application and hearing requirements described in Chapter 16.20 (Tentative Parcel Maps – Four or Less Parcels) and Section 16.22.090 (Approval by City Council). C. Subdivision Standards. An urban lot split pursuant to this Section is subject to the following standards. 1. Eligibility requirements of Government Code Section 66411.7(a) shall be satisfied. 2. A minimum lot size of one acre per dwelling unit is required for any proposed lot which does not have access to a public sewer. 3. Each lot created by the parcel map shall have a minimum area of 1,200 square feet. 4. The newly created lots shall not be smaller than 45 percent of the area of the original lot. Page 248 Urgency Ordinance No. 994 - Page 8 of 10 1 9 9 6 5. Each newly created lot must have access to a public street. 6. Lot lines shall be: i.Straight lines, unless there is a conflict with existing improvements or the natural environment; ii.Generally parallel to the street when facing the street or be at right angles perpendicular to the street on straight streets, or radial to the street on curved streets; and iii.Within appropriate physical locations that do not bisect buildings and are contiguous with existing zoning boundaries. D. Exceptions. The City Engineer shall approve an exception to any of the standards satisfied in this Section upon determining that complying with the standard would physically preclude the construction of up to two residential units or would physically preclude either of the two residential units from being 800 square feet in floor area. E. Review. The Building Official, City Engineer, and Fire Marshal shall review applications to determine whether there is a specific adverse effect to public health, safety, and welfare. F. Denial. The City Engineer shall deny an urban lot split upon making both of the following findings in writing based upon a preponderance of evidence. 1.The proposed housing development project would have a specific, adverse impact upon the public health and safety or the physical environment as defined and determined in Government Code Section 65589.5(d)(2). 2.There is no feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the specific, adverse impact. G. Covenants Required. A property owner seeking to develop units on a single-family residential property, pursuant to the standards of SB 9 and the standards of this Section, shall execute and record the following covenants against the subject property with the San Bernardino County Assessor-Recorder-Clerk and provide a copy to the City: 1.Short-Term Rental of a residential unit for a period less than 31 days shall be prohibited; 2.Non-residential uses on the site shall be prohibited; Page 249 Urgency Ordinance No. 994 - Page 9 of 10 1 9 9 6 3.Any subsequent urban lot split of land that was previously subdivided with an urban lot split shall be prohibited; 4.The owner of the property for which an urban lot split is proposed shall sign an affidavit stating that the owner intends to occupy one of the housing units as their principal residence for at least three years from the date of the approval of the urban lot split; and 5.Residential units over 800 square feet shall be rented at a level affordable to Low-Income (50%-80% AMI) households for a period of at least 45 years. SECTION 7.CEQA. Adoption of this Ordinance is not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Government Code Sections 65852.21(j) and 66411.7(n). SECTION 8.Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Interim Urgency Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Interim Urgency Ordinance. The City Council declares that it would have adopted this Interim Urgency Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions be declared invalid or unconstitutional. SECTION 9. Effective Date; Approval and Extension of Ordinance. This Interim Urgency Ordinance, being adopted as an urgency measure for the immediate protection of the public safety, health, and general welfare, containing a declaration of the facts constituting the urgency, and passed by a minimum four-fifths (4/5) vote of the City Council, shall take effect immediately upon its adoption and shall continue in effect for a period of not longer than forty-five (45) days. After notice pursuant to Government Code Section 65090 and a public hearing, the City Council may extend the effectiveness of this Urgency Ordinance as provided in Government Code Section 65858. SECTION 10. Publication. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Interim Urgency Ordinance and shall cause its publication in accordance with applicable law. Page 250 Urgency Ordinance No. 994 - Page 10 of 10 1 9 9 6 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this __ day of _____, 2022, by the following vote to wit: AYES: ( ) NOES: ( ) ABSENT: ( ) ABSTAIN: ( ) L. Dennis Michael, Mayor ATTEST: _________________________________ Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: _________________________________ Nicholas R. Ghirelli, City Attorney Page 251 City Council January 19, 2022 Urgency Ordinance 994 –SB 9 Project Background •September 16,2021 –Governor Newsom signs into law SB 9,which requires the ministerial approval of two types of projects within single- family residential zones :Urban Lot Splits and Two -Unit Projects; •December 1,2021 –staff briefs Council on policy considerations in response to SB 9; •January 1,2022 –SB 9 becomes effective statewide; •January 19,2022 –Staff proposes Council consider adopting interim urgency ordinance to maintain public health,safety and welfare while permanent ordinance is crafted . 50/50 or 45/55 Lot Split Max. unit size of 1200 sf if affordable, otherwise max 800 sf Max. unit size of 1200 sf if affordable, otherwise max. 800 sf Policy and Development Code Considerations •Objective Standards for Zoning and Subdivisions; •Consideration of establishing historic districts to protect historic character of certain neighborhoods; •Sensitivity to development within Very High Fire Severity Zones ; •Public Health and Safety Considerations; •SB 9 Units as Affordable Housing. Summary of Urgency Ordinance •Limits the application of SB 9 to single-family residential zones, which are: Very Low Residential (VL), Low Residential (L), and Hillside Residential (HR). •A maximum unit size of 800 square feet, which may be increased to 1,200 square feet if at least one of the units on the lot is reserved for rentals to very-low income households and limits new units to one-story and 16 feet in height; •Requires the Fire Marshall, City Engineer, and Building Official to review SB 9 projects to determine whether a particular project could cause a specific, adverse impact to public health and safety for which there is no feasible mitigation; and •Other objective design criteria intended to help prevent unintended impacts of SB 9 projects on existing single-family neighborhoods. Recommendation and Next Steps •Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the subject Urgency Ordinance for a period of 45-days in order to allow staff additional time to craft a permanent ordinance in response to SB 9; •Next steps: Within 45-days, return to the Council with an extension while staff prepares a permanent ordinance. Questions? DATE:January 19, 2022 TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY:Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Ian Tai, Associate Engineer SUBJECT:Consideration of a Resolution of Necessity for the Acquisition by Eminent Domain of Certain Real Property Interests for Public Purposes in Connection with the Phase 1, Segment 2, San Sevaine Trail Project, A Joint Agency Project with the City of Fontana (Chao Ping Yan, Terminus of Smokestone Street, East of Torrey Pine Court, San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Number 0228-044-24). (RESOLUTION NO. 2022- 007) (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council: 1. Consider the following Resolution, which is a Resolution of Necessity of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Declaring Certain Real Property Interests Necessary for Public Purposes and Authorizing the Acquisition Thereof in Connection with the City’s San Sevaine Trail Project: Resolution No. 2022-007 2. Open and conduct a hearing on the adoption of the proposed Resolution of Necessity, receive from City Staff the evidence stated and referred to in this Agenda Report (“Report”), take testimony from any person wishing to be heard on issues A, B, C, and D below, and consider all evidence to determine whether to adopt the proposed Resolution of Necessity, which requires the City Council’s consideration and determination. 3. If the City Council finds, based on the evidence contained and referred to in this Report, the testimony and comments submitted to the City Council, that the evidence warrants the necessary findings with respect to the proposed Resolution of Necessity, then City Staff recommends that the City Council, in the exercise of its discretion, adopt proposed Resolution of Necessity No. 2022-007, (which requires a 4/5ths vote of the entire City Council) and authorize the City Attorney’s office to file eminent domain proceedings to acquire the following real property interests (referred to below as the “Subject Property Interest”) from the parcel described below: Page 252 Page 2 1 0 9 1 Terminus of Smokestone Street, East of Torrey Pine Court, APN 0228-044-24 (Chao Ping Yang Parcel) An approximate 13,689 square foot, non-exclusive, permanent easement for public trail purposes, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto from the real property located at the Terminus of Smokestone Street, East of Torrey Pine Court, Rancho Cucamonga, and identified as San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Number 0228-044-24, which is owned by Chao Ping Yang (referred to as “Yang Parcel”). The Subject Property Interest, comprised of the above-described real property interest, is described more particularly in the Resolution of Necessity. The Resolution of Necessity, with its Exhibits, is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 4. If the City Council adopts the proposed Resolution of Necessity, authorize the City Attorney’s Office to file and prosecute an eminent domain proceeding for the acquisition of the Subject Property Interest by eminent domain. 5. Authorize the City Manager and his designees to execute all necessary documents. BACKGROUND: The City Council has before it a proposed Resolution of Necessity for the acquisition by eminent domain of certain real property interests in connection with the City’s San Sevaine Trail Project, Phase 1, Segment 2 (“Project”). This Project is a joint agency project with the City of Fontana, with the City of Fontana being the lead agency. The Project requires the acquisition of additional property for a Multi-Use (bike and pedestrian) trail. The Project extends from Banyan Street on the north and the Pacific Electric Trail, south of Victoria Street on the south, passing under Interstate 15 and State Route 210, and spanning a total of 1.35 miles. The Project will enhance the existing Flood Control District maintenance road that runs parallel to the Etiwanda Channel by adding striping, trail lighting, asphalt pavement, fencing, retaining walls, sidewalk, and curb to allow for bicyclists and pedestrian use of the Multi- Use trail easement. When completed in July 2023, the Project will provide an additional area for bike and pedestrian mobility access to the public, and will encompass areas of both the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the City of Fontana. The Plans for the Project are on file with the Engineering Services Department and are incorporated herein by this reference. The Project requires the acquisition of the Subject Property Interest for public trail, and related purposes, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto. The City has attempted to negotiate in good faith with the owner to acquire the above-described Subject Property Interest. The City has been unable to reach a negotiated acquisition with the owner of the Subject Property Interest. Based on the timing of the Project, it is necessary that the City consider the proposed Resolution of Necessity at this time. ANALYSIS: The City seeks to acquire the Subject Property Interest for public use, namely public trail and related purposes, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto in connection with the Project. The City seeks to construct the Project to improve bike and pedestrian mobility, and provide an additional outdoor recreation space for its citizens. The Project’s goal of converting a portion of Page 253 Page 3 1 0 9 1 the Flood Control District’s existing maintenance road into a Multi-Use path, is identified in the City’s General Plan. The Project was planned and located to minimize the impact on the adjacent properties. Because of its scope, the Project requires the acquisition of a non-exclusive, permanent easement over a portion of property that is privately owned and is currently encumbered by a flood control easement and storm-channel improvements. Due to the existing flood control easement and the existing storm-channel improvements, the property is not developable. Further, the property is zoned as Flood Control / Utility Corridor - Open Space. The construction of the Project will not require any business/residential relocations. The City will coordinate the construction with the owner of the Subject Property Interest to minimize the impact of the Project on the parcel. Based on the timing of the Project, it is necessary that the City consider the acquisition by eminent domain of the required Subject Property Interest. The City seeks to acquire the Subject Property Interest for public use, namely public trail and related purposes, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto in connection with the Project pursuant to the authority conferred on the City of Rancho Cucamonga to acquire real property by eminent domain by Section 19 of Article 1 of the California Constitution, Government Code Sections 37350, 37350.5, 37351, 40401, and 40404, California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1230.010 et seq. (Eminent Domain Law), including, but not limited to, Sections 1240.010, 1240.020, 1240.110, 1240.120, 1240.150, 1240.510, 1240.610, 1240.650, and by other provisions of law. For the reasons set forth above, the construction of the Project is in the public interest and necessity and is needed to improve bike and pedestrian mobility, and provide an additional outdoor recreation space for its citizens. Required Findings for Adoption of Resolution of Necessity Authorizing the Acquisition of the Subject Property Interest by Eminent Domain In order to adopt the proposed Resolution of Necessity for the acquisition by eminent domain of the Subject Property Interest, the City Council must find and determine, that: A. The public interest and necessity require the Project; B. The Project is planned and located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury; C. The Subject Property Interest described in the Resolution of Necessity is necessary for the Project; and D. The City has made an offer as required by Government Code Section 7267.2 to the owner of record of the real property interest it seeks to acquire. The amount of just compensation is not an issue before the City Council at this hearing. The hearing relates to issues A, B, C, and D above. The amount of just compensation would be determined in the eminent domain proceeding that would be filed if the City Council, in its sole discretion, adopts the proposed Resolution of Necessity. Page 254 Page 4 1 0 9 1 Environmental Analysis The environmental effects of the Project were studied and analyzed pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq., and the CEQA Guidelines, 14 Cal. Code Regs. Section 15000 et seq. (“CEQA Guidelines”). Effects were also studied and analyzed pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”). The City of Fontana (the lead agency in this joint agency project), adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) pursuant to the CEQA requirements on July 30, 2020. The State of California, Department of Transportation (“Caltrans”) determined that the project qualifies for categorical exclusion under 23 USC 327 pursuant to NEPA requirements in May 2016. In connection with the proposed Resolution of Necessity, on January 19, 2022, City Staff reviewed the environmental documentation prepared in connection with the Project. Pursuant to the criteria of Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines and Section 21166 of the Public Resources Code, City Staff concluded that no substantial changes have occurred in the Project, no substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the Project is undertaken, and that the City has obtained no new information of substantial importance that would require further environmental analysis. These environmental findings are the appropriate findings with respect to the proposed acquisition of the Subject Property Interest. City’s Actions Pursuant to Government Code Section 7260 et seq. Pursuant to Government Code Section 7260 et seq., the City of Rancho Cucamonga obtained a fair market value appraisal of the Subject Property Interest and the larger parcel of which the Subject Property Interest is a part, set just compensation in accordance with the appraised fair market value, and extended a written offer to the owner of record. The City negotiated in good faith with the record owner. As of the date of this Staff Report; however, the parties have not reached a negotiated agreement. Based on the timing of the Project, it is necessary that the City consider the adoption of the Resolution of Necessity at this time. Following is a summary of the actions taken by the City pursuant to Government Code Section 7260 et seq. Terminus of Smokestone Street, East of Torrey Pine Court, (APN 0228-044-24) (Yang Parcel) Pursuant to Government Code Section 7260 et seq., the City of Rancho Cucamonga obtained a fair market value appraisal of the Yang Parcel and the non-exclusive permanent easement the City seeks to acquire, for public use, namely public trail purposes. The City set just compensation in accordance with the appraised fair market value, and extended a written offer on September 22, 2021 to Chao Ping Yang, the owner of record. The fair market value appraisal used a date of value of July 16, 2021. The City’s written offer included an informational pamphlet describing the eminent domain process and the record owner’s rights under the Eminent Domain Law. In accordance with Government Code Section 7267.2, the City’s written offer contained a written statement of, and summary of the basis for, the amount it established as just compensation. The offer set forth the date of value utilized by the appraiser and explained Page 255 Page 5 1 0 9 1 the appraiser’s opinion of the highest and best use of the property. It explained the applicable zoning designation of the parcel. The City’s offer also summarized the principal transactions relied on by the appraiser to arrive at the appraiser’s opinion of value. In addition, the written offer explained the appraiser’s valuation analysis. It included the City’s comparable market data relied on by the appraiser. Further, the City offered, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1263.025, to pay the record owner the reasonable costs, up to $5,000.00, for an independent appraisal of the parcel. The City made several attempts to follow up and negotiate with the owner regarding the City’s offer. Based on the timing of the Project, it is necessary for the City Council to consider the adoption of the proposed Resolution of Necessity authorizing the acquisition by eminent domain of the Subject Property Interest needed from the Yang Parcel. City’s Actions Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1245.235 Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1245.235, the City sent a letter and a notice by first- class mail dated December 22, 2021 to the record owner of the Subject Property Interest the City seeks to acquire, informing him of the City’s intent to consider at its January 19, 2022 meeting, the adoption of a resolution of necessity for the acquisition by eminent domain of the Subject Property Interest. The notice advised the record owner of his right to appear and be heard regarding the City’s proposed adoption of the Resolution of Necessity by filing, within fifteen days of the date the notice was mailed, a written request with the City to appear at the hearing. The notice specifically informed the record owner of the Subject Property Interest that he has an opportunity to appear before the City Council and raise questions about whether the public interest and necessity require the Project; whether the Project is planned or located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury; and whether the Subject Property Interest the City seeks to acquire from the owner of record is necessary for the Project. As discussed above, based on the proposed timing of the Project, it is necessary for the City Council to consider the adoption of the proposed Resolution of Necessity at this time. This hearing relates to issues A, B, C, and D below. REQUIRED FINDINGS FOR ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY A. The Public Interest and Necessity Require the Project The Project, as planned and designed, is in the public interest and necessity and is needed to construct and maintain a Multi-Use (bike and pedestrian) trail. The Project extends from Banyan Street on the north and the Pacific Electric Trail, south of Victoria Street on the south, passing under Interstate 15, and spanning a total of 1.35 miles. The Project will enhance the existing Flood Control District maintenance road that runs parallel to the Etiwanda Channel by adding striping, trail lighting, asphalt pavement, fencing, retaining walls, sidewalk, and curb to allow bicyclist and pedestrian use of the Multi-Use trail easement. When completed in July 2023, the Project will provide an additional area for bike and pedestrian mobility access to the public, and will encompass areas of both the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the City of Fontana. The Plans for the Project are on file with the Engineering Services Department and are incorporated herein by this reference. Page 256 Page 6 1 0 9 1 The Project, as planned and designed, is consistent with the Land Use and Community Character Element of the General Plan. Goal LC-5, Connected Corridors, provides for “A citywide network of transportation and open space corridors that provides a high level of connectivity for pedestrians, bicyclists, equestrians, motorists, and transit users. Further, Goal OS-1, Open Space, provides for “A complete, connected network of diverse parks, trails, and rural and natural open space that support a wide variety of recreational, educational and outdoor activities.” Goal OS-2, Trails, provides for “A complete, connected network of diverse trails and connected open space that improves access to all areas of the city and encourages non-motorized activities.” Specifically, Goal OS-2.5 provides, “Utility Corridors. Preserve the primary function of utility corridors while providing every reasonable opportunity for shared public use for active mobility and recreational purposes.” The City seeks to acquire the Subject Property Interest for public use, namely a non-exclusive, Multi-Use (bike and pedestrian) trail and related purposes, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto in connection with the Project. The City seeks to construct the Project to improve bike and pedestrian mobility, and provide a complementary use to property encumbered with an existing flood control easement, that will benefit the community. The Project was planned and located to minimize the impact on the adjacent properties. Because of its scope, the Project requires the acquisition of a non- exclusive, permanent easement over a portion of property that is privately owned and is currently encumbered by a flood control easement and storm-channel improvements. Due to the existing flood control easement and the existing storm- channel improvements, the property is not developable. Further, the property is zoned as Flood Control / Utility Corridor - Open Space. The construction of the Project will not require any business/residential relocations. The City will coordinate the construction with the owner of the Subject Property Interest to minimize the impact of the Project on the parcel. Based on the timing of the Project, it is necessary that the City consider the acquisition by eminent domain of the required Subject Property Interest. The public use for which the City seeks to acquire the Subject Property Interest, namely public trail and related purposes, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto, will not unreasonably interfere with or impair the continuance of the public use to which any easement holders may have appropriated the area (Code of Civil Procedure Section 1240.510). Accordingly, the City is authorized to acquire the Subject Property Interest pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Sections 1240.510, 1240.610, and 1240.650. B. The Project is Planned and Located in the Manner that will be Most Compatible with the Greatest Public Good and the Least Private Injury The Project, as planned and designed, is in the public interest and necessity and is needed to construct and maintain a Multi-Use (bike and pedestrian) trail. The Project extends from Banyan Street on the north and the Pacific Electric Trail, south of Victoria Street on the south, passing under Interstate 15, and spanning a total of 1.35 miles. The Project will enhance the existing Flood Control District maintenance road that runs parallel to the Etiwanda Channel by adding striping, trail lighting, asphalt pavement, fencing, retaining walls, sidewalk, and curb to allow Page 257 Page 7 1 0 9 1 bicyclist and pedestrian use of the Multi-Use trail easement. When completed in July 2023, the Project will provide an additional area for bike and pedestrian mobility access to the public, and will encompass areas of both the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the City of Fontana. The Plans for the Project are on file with the Engineering Services Department and are incorporated herein by this reference. The Project, as planned and designed, is consistent with the Land Use and Community Character Element of the General Plan. Goal LC-5, Connected Corridors, provides for “A citywide network of transportation and open space corridors that provides a high level of connectivity for pedestrians, bicyclists, equestrians, motorists, and transit users. Further, Goal OS-1, Open Space, provides for “A complete, connected network of diverse parks, trails, and rural and natural open space that support a wide variety of recreational, educational and outdoor activities.” Goal OS-2, Trails, provides for “A complete, connected network of diverse trails and connected open space that improves access to all areas of the city and encourages non-motorized activities.” Specifically, Goal OS-2.5 provides, “Utility Corridors. Preserve the primary function of utility corridors while providing every reasonable opportunity for shared public use for active mobility and recreational purposes.” The City seeks to acquire the Subject Property Interest for public use, namely a non-exclusive, Multi-Use (bike and pedestrian) trail and related purposes, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto in connection with the Project. The City seeks to construct the Project to improve bike and pedestrian mobility, and provide a complementary use to property encumbered with an existing flood control easement, that will benefit the community. The Project was planned and located to minimize the impact on the adjacent properties. Because of its scope, the Project requires the acquisition of a non- exclusive, permanent easement over a portion of property that is privately owned and is currently encumbered by a flood control easement and storm-channel improvements. Due to the existing flood control easement and the existing storm- channel improvements, the property is not developable. Further, the property is zoned Flood Control / Utility Corridor - Open Space. The construction of the Project will not require any business/residential relocations. The City will coordinate the construction with the owner of the Subject Property Interest to minimize the impact of the Project on the parcel. Based on the timing of the Project, it is necessary that the City consider the acquisition by eminent domain of the required Subject Property Interest. The public use for which the City seeks to acquire the Subject Property Interest, namely public trail and related purposes, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto, will not unreasonably interfere with or impair the continuance of the public use to which any easement holders may have appropriated the area (Code of Civil Procedure Section 1240.510). Accordingly, the City is authorized to acquire the Subject Property Interest pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Sections 1240.510, 1240.610, and 1240.650. Page 258 Page 8 1 0 9 1 C. The Subject Property Interest Described in the Resolutions of Necessity are Necessary for the Project The City seeks to construct the Project, as planned and designed, to construct and maintain a Multi-Use (bike and pedestrian) trail. The Project extends from Banyan Street on the north and the Pacific Electric Trail, south of Victoria Street on the south, passing under Interstate 15, and spanning a total of 1.35 miles. The Project will enhance the existing Flood Control District maintenance road that runs parallel to the Etiwanda Channel by adding striping, trail lighting, asphalt pavement, fencing, retaining walls, sidewalk, and curb to allow bicyclist and pedestrian use of the Multi-Use trail easement. When completed in July 2023, the Project will provide an additional area for bike and pedestrian mobility access to the public, and will encompass areas of both the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the City of Fontana. Further, the Project is consistent with the Land Use and Community Character Element of the City’s General Plan. The City cannot construct the Project without the acquisition of the Subject Property Interest, which is described more particularly in the Resolution of Necessity: Terminus of Smokestone Street, East of Torrey Pine Court, APN 0228-044- 24 (Yang Parcel) An approximate 13,689 square foot non-exclusive, permanent easement for Multi-Use public trail purposes, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto from the real property located at the Terminus of Smokestone Street, East of Torrey Pine Court, Rancho Cucamonga, and identified as San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Number 0228-044-24, which is owned by Chao Ping Yang. As stated above, the public use for which the City seeks to acquire the Subject Property Interest, namely public trail and related purposes, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto, will not unreasonably interfere with or impair the continuance of the public use to which any easement holders may have appropriated the area (Code of Civil Procedure Section 1240.510). Accordingly, the City is authorized to acquire the Subject Property Interest pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Sections 1240.510, 1240.610, and 1240.650. D. The City has made an offer as required by Government Code Section 7267.2 to the owner of record of the Subject Property Interest The City, pursuant to Government Code Section 7260 et seq., obtained a fair market value appraisal of the Subject Property Interest, set just compensation in accordance with the fair market value and extended a written offer to the owner of record of the Subject Property Interest. As detailed above, the City extended to the owner of record of the Subject Property Interest a written offer pursuant to Government Code Section 7267.2 to acquire the Subject Property Interest for public use, namely public trail and related purposes, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto. Specifically, the City extended a written offer to the record owner of the Subject Property Interest: Page 259 Page 9 1 0 9 1 The City extended a written offer to Chao Ping Yang. to purchase an approximate 13,689 square foot non-exclusive, permanent easement for public trail purposes, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto over a portion of the real property located at the Terminus of Smokestone Street, East of Torrey Pine Court, Rancho Cucamonga, and further identified as a portion of San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Number 0228- 044-24. Incorporation of Above-Referenced Documents: The following documents on file with the City Clerk’s Office and/or the Engineering Services Department, which are referenced in this report, are incorporated herein by this reference: Resolution of Necessity (attached hereto) City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Offer letter to the record owner of the Subject Property Interest Notice pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1245.235 to the record owner of the Subject Property Interest Plans for Project Environmental Documents relating to Project Notice of Exemption FISCAL IMPACT: The Project is a joint agency project with the City of Fontana serving as the lead agency. In a previously approved Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) identified by City of Rancho Cucamonga Contract Number 17-029, the MOU states the funding is from the Recreational Trails Program and Mobile Source Air Pollution Reduction Clean Transportation Funding grant money, and Fontana money. Work performed under the MOU will be at no cost to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. After the project completion, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will be responsible for maintenance cost of the portion of the Project that is within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. This will be from the General Fund. COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: The Project is creating a new trail for pedestrians and bicyclists and this supports the City Council’s Vision of creating a world class community, and also the Values of providing a high- quality life as well as promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 – Proposed Resolution of Necessity 2022-007 Page 260 Resolution No. 2022-007 – Page 1 of 11 RESOLUTION NO. 2022-007 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY INTERESTS NECESSARY FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES AND AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION THEREOF IN CONNECTION WITH THE SAN SEVAINE TRAIL PROJECT, PHASE 1, SEGMENT 2 (A PERMANENT EASEMENT OVER A PORTION OF APN 0228-044-24) WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga (“City”) is a municipal corporation in the County of San Bernardino, State of California; and WHEREAS, the City seeks to construct the San Sevaine Trail Project, Phase 1, Segment 2 (“Project”). The Project requires the acquisition of additional property for a Multi-Use (bike and pedestrian) trail. The Project extends from Banyan Street on the north and the Pacific Electric Trail, south of Victoria Street on the south, passing under Interstate 15, and spanning a total of 1.35 miles. The Project will enhance the existing Flood Control District maintenance road that runs parallel to the Etiwanda Channel by adding striping, trail lighting, asphalt pavement, fencing, retaining walls, sidewalk, and curb to allow bicyclists and pedestrian use of the Multi-Use trail easement. When completed in July 2023, the Project will provide an additional area for bike and pedestrian mobility access to the public, and will encompass areas of both the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the City of Fontana. The Plans for the Project are on file with the Engineering Services Department and are incorporated herein by this reference; and WHEREAS, the environmental effects of the Project were studied and analyzed pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq., and the CEQA Guidelines, 14 Cal. Code Regs. Section 15000 et seq. (“CEQA Guidelines”). Effects were also studied and analyzed pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”). The City of Fontana (the lead agency in this joint agency project), adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) pursuant to the CEQA requirements on July 30, 2020. The State of California, Department of Transportation (“Caltrans”) determined that the project qualifies for categorical exclusion under 23 USC 327 pursuant to NEPA requirements in May 2016; and WHEREAS, in connection with the proposed Resolution of Necessity, on January 19, 2022, City Staff reviewed the environmental documentation prepared in connection with the Project. Pursuant to the criteria of Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines and Section 21166 of the Public Resources Code, City Staff concluded that no substantial changes have occurred in the Project, no substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the Project is undertaken, and that the City has obtained no new information of substantial importance that would require further environmental ATTACHMENT 1 Page 261 Resolution No. 2022-007 – Page 2 of 11 analysis. These environmental findings are the appropriate findings with respect to the proposed acquisition of the Subject Property Interest. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1. The Rancho Cucamonga City Council adopts Resolution No. 2022- 007, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, Declaring Certain Real Property Interests Necessary for Public Purposes and Authorizing the Acquisition Thereof in Connection with the San Sevaine Trail Project, Phase 1, Segment 2 (a permanent easement over a portion of APN 0228-044-24). SECTION 2. The City seeks to acquire by eminent domain the real property interest described below in Section 3 of this Resolution for public use, namely public trail and related purposes, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto in connection with the San Sevaine Trail Project, Phase 1 pursuant to the authority conferred on the City of Rancho Cucamonga to acquire real property by eminent domain by Section 19 of Article 1 of the California Constitution, Government Code Sections 37350, 37350.5, 37351, 40401, and 40404, California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1230.010 et seq. (Eminent Domain Law), including but, not limited to, Sections 1240.010, 1240.020, 1240.110, 1240.120, 1240.150, 1240.510, 1240.610, 1240.650, and by other provisions of law. SECTION 3. The City seeks to acquire an approximate 13,689 square foot permanent easement over a portion of the real property located at the Terminus of Smokestone Street, East of Torrey Pine Court, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and further identified as San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Number 0228-044-24 in connection with the Project. The permanent easement is referred to herein as “Subject Property Interest,” and APN 0228-044-24 is referred to herein as “Yang Parcel.” The Subject Property Interest is described more particularly in Exhibit “A” and depicted on Exhibit “B”, which are attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. SECTION 4. The environmental effects of the acquisition of the Subject Property Interest were studied as an integral part of the environmental review for the Project. In connection with the proposed Resolution of Necessity, on January 19, 2022, City Staff reviewed the environmental documentation prepared in connection with the Project. Pursuant to the criteria of Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines and Section 21166 of the Public Resources Code, City Staff concluded that no substantial changes have occurred in the Project, no substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the Project is undertaken, and that the City has obtained no new information of substantial importance that would require further environmental analysis. These environmental findings are the appropriate findings with respect to the proposed acquisition of the Subject Property Interest. SECTION 5. The Project, as planned and designed, is in the public interest and necessity and is needed to construct and maintain a Multi-Use (bike and pedestrian) trail, as more fully explained below: Page 262 Resolution No. 2022-007 – Page 3 of 11 A. The Project extends from Banyan Street on the north and the Pacific Electric Trail, south of Victoria Street on the south, passing under Interstate 15, and spanning a total of 1.35 miles. The Project will enhance the existing Flood Control District maintenance road that runs parallel to the Etiwanda Channel by adding striping, trail lighting, asphalt pavement, fencing, retaining walls, sidewalk, and curb to allow bicyclist and pedestrian use of the Multi-Use trail easement. When completed in July 2023, the Project will provide an additional area for bike and pedestrian mobility access to the public, and will encompass areas of both the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the City of Fontana. All work is consistent with the Land Use and Community Character Element of the City’s General Plan. B. Goal LC-5, Connected Corridors, of the Land Use and Community Character Element, provides for “A citywide network of transportation and open space corridors that provides a high level of connectivity for pedestrians, bicyclists, equestrians, motorists, and transit users. Further, Goal OS-1, Open Space, provides for “A complete, connected network of diverse parks, trails, and rural and natural open space that support a wide variety of recreational, educational and outdoor activities.” Goal OS-2, Trails, provides for “A complete, connected network of diverse trails and connected open space that improves access to all areas of the city and encourages non-motorized activities.” Specifically, Goal OS-2.5 provides, “Utility Corridors. Preserve the primary function of utility corridors while providing every reasonable opportunity for shared public use for active mobility and recreational purposes.” The City seeks to acquire the Subject Property Interest for public use, namely a non-exclusive, Multi-Use (bike and pedestrian) trail and related purposes, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto in connection with the Project. The City seeks to construct the Project to improve bike and pedestrian mobility, and provide a complementary use to property encumbered with an existing flood control easement, that will benefit the community. C. The Project was planned and located to minimize the impact on the adjacent properties. Because of its scope, the Project requires the acquisition of a non- exclusive, permanent easement over a portion of property that is privately owned and is currently encumbered by a flood control easement and storm-channel improvements. Due to the existing flood control easement and the existing storm-channel improvements, the property is not developable. Further, the property is zoned OS, Flood Control - Open Space. The construction of the Project will not require any business/residential relocations. The City will coordinate the construction with the owner of the Subject Property Interest to minimize the impact of the Project on the parcel. Based on the timing of the Project, it is necessary that the City consider the acquisition by eminent domain of the required Subject Property Interest. SECTION 6. A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 7260 et seq., the City of Rancho Cucamonga obtained a fair market value appraisal of the Yang Parcel, and the approximate 13,689 square foot permanent easement the City seeks to acquire for public use, namely public trail and related purposes, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto. Page 263 Resolution No. 2022-007 – Page 4 of 11 B. The City set just compensation in accordance with the appraised fair market value, and extended a written offer on September 22, 2021 to Chao Ping Yang, the owner of record. The fair market value appraisal used a date of value of July 16, 2021. C. The City’s written offer included an informational pamphlet describing the eminent domain process and the record owner’s rights under the Eminent Domain Law. In accordance with Government Code Section 7267.2, the City’s written offer contained a written statement of, and summary of the basis for, the amount it established as just compensation. The offer set forth the date of value utilized by the appraiser and explained the appraiser’s opinion of the highest and best use of the larger parcel. It explained the applicable zoning designation of the larger parcel. The City’s offer also summarized the principal transactions relied on by the appraiser to arrive at the appraiser’s opinion of value. In addition, the written offer explained the appraiser’s valuation analysis, including severance damages. It included the City’s comparable market data relied on by the appraiser. Further, the City offered, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1263.025, to pay the record owner the reasonable costs, up to $5,000.00, for an independent appraisal of the approximate 13,689 square foot permanent easement area. SECTION 7. The City provided written notice to the owner of record, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1245.235 of the City Council’s intent to consider the adoption of a Resolution of Necessity for the acquisition of the Subject Property Interest by eminent domain. SECTION 8. The public use for which the City seeks to acquire the Subject Property Interest, namely public trail and related purposes, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto, will not unreasonably interfere with or impair the continuance of the public use to which any easement holders may have appropriated the area (Code of Civil Procedure Section 1240.510). Accordingly, the City is authorized to acquire the Subject Property Interest pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Sections 1240.510, 1240.610, and 1240.650. SECTION 9. Based on the evidence presented at the hearing regarding the Project, including the Agenda Report and documents referenced therein and any oral and written testimony at the hearing, the City Council hereby finds and determines that: A. The public interest and necessity require the Project; B. The Project is planned and located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury; C. The Subject Property Interest described more particularly in Exhibit “A” and depicted on Exhibit “B” hereto, is necessary for the Project; and D. The City has made the offer required by Government Code Section 7267.2 to the record owner of the Subject Property Interest the City seeks to acquire. Page 264 Resolution No. 2022-007 – Page 5 of 11 SECTION 10. The findings and declarations contained in this Resolution are based upon the record before the City Council, including the Agenda Report and all documents referenced therein, all of which are incorporated herein by this reference, and any testimony and/or comments submitted to the City by the record owner and or the owner’s representative(s). These documents include, but are not limited to, the City of Rancho Cucamonga’s General Plan, the offer letter sent to the owner pursuant to Government Code Section 7267.2, the notice to the record owner pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1245.235 of the City’s intent to consider the adoption of the Resolution of Necessity, San Sevaine Trail Plans for the Project, and the Notice of Exemption for the Project. SECTION 11. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby authorizes and directs the City Attorney’s Office to take all steps necessary to commence and prosecute legal proceedings in a court of competent jurisdiction to acquire an approximate 13,689 square foot permanent easement for the Project. The Subject Property Interest is described more particularly on Exhibit “A” and depicted on Exhibit “B” hereto. SECTION 12. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby authorizes the City Manager to execute all necessary documents in connection with the eminent domain proceeding. SECTION 13. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 19th day of January, 2022. ________________________ L. Dennis Michael, Mayor City of Rancho Cucamonga ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk City of Rancho Cucamonga APPROVED AS TO FORM: Nicholas R. Ghirelli, City Attorney Richards, Watson & Gershon Page 265 Resolution No. 2022-007 – Page 6 of 11 CERTIFICATION: I, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2022-007, was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on the 19th day of January, 2022, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: _______________________________ Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk City of Rancho Cucamonga, California Page 266 Resolution No. 2022-007 – Page 7 of 11&nbsp;&nbsp;Page 267 Resolution No. 2022-007 – Page 8 of 11&nbsp;&nbsp;Page 268 Resolution No. 2022-007 – Page 9 of 11&nbsp;&nbsp;Page 269 Resolution No. 2022-007 – Page 10 of 11&nbsp;&nbsp;Page 270 Resolution No. 2022-007 – Page 11 of 11&nbsp;&nbsp;Page 271 San Sevaine Trail Project Public Hearing Resolution of Necessity Public Need –Project Description Public Need –Existing Conditions Smokestone St. Flood Control Channel Larger Parcel Public Need –Existing Conditions Public Need Proposed Improvements Project will construct a Multi-Use Trail including: •Striping •Trail Lighting •Asphalt Pavement •Fencing •Retaining Walls •Sidewalk •Curb Public Need Proposed Improvements The project will result in: •1.35 miles of new multi-use trail •Implementation of General Plan goals for multi-modal mobility •Expanded space for biking and walking Right-of-Way Needs/Offers Yang Parcel: 13,689 SF of Non-Exclusive Permanent Easement for Public Trail Purposes is Needed for the Project. Larger Parcel Necessary Findings A.The public interest and necessity require the project. B.The proposed project is planned and located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and least private injury. C.The subject property interests described in each Resolution of Necessity are necessary for the proposed project. D.The City has made an offer as required by Government Code Section 7267.2 to each of the owners of record of the real property it seeks to acquire. DATE:January 19, 2022 TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY:Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Ian Tai, Associate Engineer SUBJECT:Consideration of Resolutions of Necessity of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Declaring Certain Real Property Interests Necessary for Public Purposes and Authorizing the Acquisition Thereof in Connection with the City’s Etiwanda Grade Separation Project (Kular Truck Line, Inc., 8783 Etiwanda Avenue and 12949 Whittram Avenue, San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Number 0229-162-14; Lightning PM, LLC, 8889 Etiwanda Avenue, San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 0229-291-17 & 18; SCG of DP Etiwanda, LLC, 8768 & 8822 Etiwanda Avenue, San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 0229-131-15, 16 & 26; Jones Family Trust, Garness Family Trust, & Clemons Revocable Trust, 8821 Etiwanda Avenue, San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Number 0229-162-15; Goodman Rancho SPE, LLC, 12521 Arrow Route and 8688 Etiwanda Avenue, San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 0229- 131-30 & 31; BTC III Rancho Cucamonga Logistics Center, LP, 8996 Etiwanda Avenue, San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Number 0229-283-79; BCORE IE West Owner, LLC, 8939 Etiwanda Avenue, San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Number 0229- 291-55; Southern California Edison Company, 8949 Etiwanda Avenue, San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Number 0229-291-22; Colombero Family Limited Partnership, 8685 - 8821 Etiwanda Avenue and 12928 - 12974 Whittram Avenue, San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 0229-151-15 & 28 and 0229-161-01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 19 & 20). (RESOLUTION NOS. 2022-008, 2022-009, 2022-010, 2022-011, 2022-012, 2022-013, 2022-014, 2022-015, 2022-016) (CITY). RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council: 1. Consider the following nine Resolutions, which are Resolutions of Necessity of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Declaring Certain Real Property Interests Necessary for Public Purposes and Authorizing the Acquisition Thereof in Connection with the City’s Etiwanda Grade Separation Project: Page 272 Page 2 1 0 9 0 Resolution No. 2022-008 (Kular Truck Line Parcel) Resolution No. 2022-009 (Lightning PM Parcel) Resolution No. 2022-010 (SCG of DP Etiwanda Parcel) Resolution No. 2022-011 (Jones, Garness & Clemons Parcel) Resolution No. 2022-012 (Goodman Rancho SPE Parcel) Resolution No. 2022-013 (BTC III Parcel) Resolution No. 2022-014 (BCORE IE Parcel) Resolution No. 2022-015 (SCE Parcel) Resolution No. 2022-016 (Colombero Parcel) 2. Open and conduct a hearing on the adoption of the proposed Resolutions of Necessity, receive from City Staff the evidence stated and referred to in this Agenda Report (“Report”), take testimony from any person wishing to be heard on issues A, B, C, and D below, and consider all evidence to determine whether to adopt each proposed Resolution of Necessity, each of which requires the City Council’s consideration and determination. 3. If the City Council finds, based on the evidence contained and referred to in this Report, the testimony and comments submitted to the City Council, that the evidence warrants the necessary findings with respect to each of the proposed Resolutions of Necessity, then City Staff recommends that the City Council, in the exercise of its discretion, adopt proposed Resolution of Necessity No. 2022-008, Resolution of Necessity No. 2022-009, Resolution of Necessity No. 2022-010, Resolution of Necessity No. 2022-011, Resolution of Necessity No. 2022-012, Resolution of Necessity No. 2022-013, Resolution of Necessity No. 2022-014, Resolution of Necessity No. 2022-015, and Resolution of Necessity No. 2022-016 (each of which requires a 4/5ths vote of the entire City Council) and authorize the City Attorney’s office to file eminent domain proceedings to acquire the following real property interests (referred to below collectively as the “Subject Property Interests”) from the parcels described below: 8783 Etiwanda Avenue and 12949 Whittram Avenue, APN 0229-162-14 (Kular Truck Line Parcel) A fee simple interest for grade separation purposes, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto in the real property located at 8783 Etiwanda Avenue and 12949 Whittram Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, and identified as San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Number 0229-162-14, which is owned by Kular Truck Line, Inc. (referred to as “Kular Parcel”). 8889 Etiwanda Avenue, APNs 0229-291-17 & 18 (Lightning PM Parcel) An approximate 2,655 square foot temporary construction easement with a term of 18 months for grade separation purposes, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto from the real property located at 8889 Etiwanda Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, and Page 273 Page 3 1 0 9 0 identified as San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 0229-291-17 and 0229-291-18, which is owned by Lightning PM LLC (referred to as “Lightning PM Parcel”). 8768 and 8822 Etiwanda Avenue, APNs 0229-131-15, 16 & 26 (SCG of DP Etiwanda Parcel) An approximate 8,073 square foot temporary construction easement with a term of 18 months for grade separation purposes, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto from the real property located at 8768 and 8822 Etiwanda Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, and identified as San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 0229-131-15, 0229-131-16, and 0229-131-26, which is owned by SCG of DP Etiwanda LLC (referred to as “SCG of DP Etiwanda Parcel”). 8821 Etiwanda Avenue, APN 0229-162-15 (Jones, Garness & Clemons Parcel) An approximate 5,011 square foot temporary construction easement with a term of 18 months for grade separation purposes, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto from the real property located at 8821 Etiwanda Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, and identified as San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Number 0229-162-15, which is owned by the Jones Family Trust, The Garness Family Trust, and the Clemons Revocable Trust (referred to as “Jones, Garness, and Clemons Parcel”). 12521 Arrow Route & 8688 Etiwanda Avenue, APNs 0229-131-30 & 31 (Goodman Rancho SPE Parcel) Two temporary construction easements, each with a term of 30 months, for grade separation purposes, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto, consisting of approximately 1,254 square feet and approximately 4,024 square feet over portions of the real property located at 12521 Arrow Route and 8688 Etiwanda Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and further identified as San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 0229-131-30 and 0229-131-31, which is owned by Goodman Rancho SPE LLC. 8996 Etiwanda Avenue, APN 0229-283-79 (BTC III Parcel) An approximate 401 square foot permanent easement, an approximate 14,801 square foot permanent easement, and an approximate 7,936 square foot temporary construction easement with a term of 30 months for grade separation purposes, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto from the real property located at 8996 Etiwanda Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, and identified as San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Number 0229-283-79, which is owned by BTC III Rancho Cucamonga Logistics Center, LP (referred to as “BTC III Parcel”). 8939 Etiwanda Avenue, APN 0229-291-55 (BCORE IE Parcel) An approximate 1,201 square foot permanent easement and an approximate 1,295 square foot temporary construction easement with a term of 30 months for grade separation purposes, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto from the real property located at 8939 Etiwanda Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, and identified as Page 274 Page 4 1 0 9 0 San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Number 0229-291-55, which is owned by BCORE IE West Owner, LLC (referred to as “BCORE IE Parcel”). 8949 Etiwanda Avenue, APN 0229-291-22 (SCE Parcel) An approximate 52,464 square foot permanent easement and an approximate 1,972 square foot temporary construction easement with a term of 18 months for grade separation purposes, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto from the real property located at 8949 Etiwanda Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, and identified as San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Number 0229-291-22, which is owned by Southern California Edison Company (referred to as “SCE Parcel”). 8685 to 8821 Etiwanda Avenue & 12928 to 12974 Whittram Avenue, APNs 0229- 151-15 & 28, 0229-161-01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 19 & 20 (Colombero Parcel) An approximate 5,130 square foot permanent easement, an approximate 2,986 square foot maintenance and construction easement, and an approximate 3,192 square foot temporary construction easement and an approximate 677 square foot temporary construction easement, each with a term of 30 months, for grade separation purposes, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto from the real property located at 8685 to 8821 Etiwanda Avenue & 12928 to 12974 Whittram Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, and identified as San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 0229-151-15 & 28, 0229-161-01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 19 & 20, which is owned by Colombero Family Limited Partnership (referred to as “Colombero Parcel”). The Subject Property Interests, comprised of the above-described real property interests, are described more particularly in each respective Resolution of Necessity. The Resolutions of Necessity, with their respective Exhibits, are attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 4. If the City Council adopts the proposed Resolutions of Necessity, authorize the City Attorney’s Office to file and prosecute an eminent domain proceedings for the acquisition of the Subject Property Interests by eminent domain. 5. Authorize the City Manager to execute all necessary documents. BACKGROUND: The City Council has before it nine proposed Resolutions of Necessity for the acquisition by eminent domain of certain real property interests in connection with the City’s Etiwanda Grade Separation Project (“Project”). The Project requires the acquisition of additional right of way for grade separation. The Project involves the widening and construction of Etiwanda Avenue as a four-lane grade separated roadway over the Southern California Regional Rail Authority (“SCRRA”)/Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railroad (“BNSF”) San Gabriel subdivision, currently a two-lane at-grade crossing. The Project will construct an overhead crossing, utilizing walls and embankments to support the raised approaching roadway. It will span the railroad right-of-way and provide access to adjacent properties. The Project will widen Etiwanda Avenue to four traffic lanes including a painted median/left turn lane with bike lanes and sidewalks on each side and a northbound right turn lane onto Whittram Avenue. When completed in 2024, the Project will reduce vehicle and truck delays, as well as queuing. It will improve mobility, safety, and level of service at the crossing, and it will Page 275 Page 5 1 0 9 0 provide for the safe transit of pedestrians, bicyclists, vehicles, trucks, and trains. Furthermore, the Project will provide for improved response times in the area for first responders such as police officers, firefighters, paramedics, and emergency medical technicians. The Plans for the Project are on file with the Engineering Services Department and are incorporated herein by this reference. The Project requires the acquisition of the Subject Property Interests for grade separation, and related purposes, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto. The City has attempted to negotiate in good faith with each of the owners to acquire the above-described Subject Property Interests. The owners of the Subject Property Interests have either not responded to the City’s communications, or the City has been unable to reach a negotiated acquisition with the owners for the Subject Property Interests. Based on the timing of the Project, it is necessary that the City consider the proposed Resolutions of Necessity at this time. ANALYSIS: The City seeks to acquire the Subject Property Interests for public use, namely grade separation and related purposes, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto in connection with the Project. The City seeks to construct the Project to improve circulation, mobility, and vehicle and rail safety. The Project’s goal of converting the portion of Etiwanda Avenue where it crosses the SCRRA railroad corridor into a grade separated crossing, is identified in the City’s General Plan. The Project was planned and located to minimize the impact on the adjacent properties. Because of its scope, the Project requires the acquisition of several permanent easements and temporary construction easements over portions of 10 larger parcels, as well as fee interests in two parcels owned by private property owners. The construction of the Project will require some business/residential relocations. The City will coordinate the construction with the owners of the Subject Property Interests to minimize the impact of the Project on the parcels and to assist those persons and businesses displaced by the Project. Based on the timing of the Project, it is necessary that the City consider the acquisition by eminent domain of the required Subject Property Interests. The City seeks to acquire the Subject Property Interests for public use, namely grade separation and related purposes, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto in connection with the Project pursuant to the authority conferred on the City of Rancho Cucamonga to acquire real property by eminent domain by Section 19 of Article 1 of the California Constitution, Government Code Sections 37350, 37350.5, 37351, 40401, and 40404, California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1230.010 et seq. (Eminent Domain Law), including but not limited to Sections 1240.010, 1240.020, 1240.110, 1240.120, 1240.150, 1240.510, 1240.610, 1240.650, and by other provisions of law. For the reasons set forth above, the construction of the Project is in the public interest and necessity and is needed to improve circulation, mobility, and vehicle and rail safety. Required Findings for Adoption of Resolutions of Necessity Authorizing the Acquisition of the Subject Property Interests by Eminent Domain In order to adopt the proposed Resolutions of Necessity for the acquisition by eminent domain of the Subject Property Interests, the City Council must find and determine, that: A. The public interest and necessity require the Project; Page 276 Page 6 1 0 9 0 B. The Project is planned and located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury; C. The Subject Property Interests described in the Resolutions of Necessity are necessary for the Project; and D. The City has made an offer as required by Government Code Section 7267.2 to the owners of record of the real property interests it seeks to acquire. The amount of just compensation is not an issue before the City Council at this hearing. The hearing relates to issues A, B, C, and D above. The amount of just compensation would be determined in the eminent domain proceedings that would be filed if the City Council, in its sole discretion, adopts the proposed Resolutions of Necessity. Environmental Analysis The environmental effects of the Project were studied and analyzed pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq., and the CEQA Guidelines, 14 Cal. Code Regs. Section 15000 et seq. (“CEQA Guidelines”). City Staff determined that the Project was statutorily exempt pursuant to CEQA Article 18. Statutory Exemptions, Section 15282. Other Statutory Exemptions, paragraph (g): Any railroad grade separation project which eliminates an existing grade crossing or which reconstructs an existing grade separation as set forth in Section 21080.13 of the Public Resources Code. On June 6, 2018, the City Council approved the Notice of Exemption and authorized Staff to file the Notice of Exemption with the Office of Planning and Research and the County clerk as specified in Section 21080.13(2) of the Public Resources Code. The City duly filed the Notice of Exemption with the Office of Planning and Research and with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, County of San Bernardino on or about June 11, 2018 in accordance with the statutory requirements. In connection with the proposed Resolutions of Necessity, on January 19, 2022, City Staff reviewed the environmental documentation prepared in connection with the Project. Pursuant to the criteria of Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines and Section 21166 of the Public Resources Code, City Staff concluded that no substantial changes have occurred in the Project, no substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the Project is undertaken, and that the City has obtained no new information of substantial importance that would require further environmental analysis. These environmental findings are the appropriate findings with respect to the proposed acquisition of the Subject Property Interests. City’s Actions Pursuant to Government Code Section 7260 et seq. Pursuant to Government Code Section 7260 et seq., the City of Rancho Cucamonga obtained fair market value appraisals of the Subject Property Interests and the larger parcels of which the permanent and temporary construction easements of the Subject Property Interests are a part, set just compensation in accordance with the appraised fair market values, and extended written offers to the owners of record. The City negotiated in good faith with the record owners. As of the date of this Staff Report; however, the parties have not reached a negotiated agreement. Page 277 Page 7 1 0 9 0 Based on the timing of the Project, it is necessary that the City consider the adoption of the Resolutions of Necessity at this time. Following is a summary of the actions taken by the City pursuant to Government Code Section 7260 et seq. 8783 Etiwanda Avenue and 12949 Whittram Avenue, APN 0229-162-14 (Kular Truck Line Parcel) Pursuant to Government Code Section 7260 et seq., the City of Rancho Cucamonga obtained a fair market value appraisal of the Kular Parcel the City seeks to acquire in fee simple, for public use, namely grade separation purposes. The City set just compensation in accordance with the appraised fair market value, and extended a written offer on September 22, 2021 to Kular Truck Line, Inc., the owner of record. The fair market value appraisal used a date of value of July 16, 2021. The City’s written offer included an informational pamphlet describing the eminent domain process and the record owner’s rights under the Eminent Domain Law. In accordance with Government Code Section 7267.2, the City’s written offer contained a written statement of, and summary of the basis for, the amount it established as just compensation. The offer set forth the date of value utilized by the appraiser and explained the appraiser’s opinion of the highest and best use of the property. It explained the applicable zoning designation of the parcel. The City’s offer also summarized the principal transactions relied on by the appraiser to arrive at the appraiser’s opinion of value. In addition, the written offer explained the appraiser’s valuation analysis. It included the City’s comparable market data relied on by the appraiser. Further, the City offered, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1263.025, to pay the record owner the reasonable costs, up to $5,000.00, for an independent appraisal of the parcel. The City made several attempts to follow up and negotiate with the owner regarding the City’s offer. Based on the timing of the Project, it is necessary for the City Council to consider the adoption of the proposed Resolution of Necessity authorizing the acquisition by eminent domain of the Subject Property Interest needed from the Kular Parcel. 8889 Etiwanda Avenue, APNs 0229-291-17 & 18 (Lightning PM Parcel) Pursuant to Government Code Section 7260 et seq., the City of Rancho Cucamonga obtained a fair market value appraisal of the Lightning PM Parcel, and the approximate 2,655 square foot temporary construction easement the City seeks to acquire for a period of 18 months for public use, namely grade separation purposes. The City set just compensation in accordance with the appraised fair market value, and extended a written offer on October 26, 2021 to Lightning PM LLC, the owner of record. The fair market value appraisal used a date of value of October 14, 2021. The City’s written offer included an informational pamphlet describing the eminent domain process and the record owner’s rights under the Eminent Domain Law. In accordance with Government Code Section 7267.2, the City’s written offer contained a written statement of, and summary of the basis for, the amount it established as just compensation. The offer set forth the date of value utilized by the appraiser and explained the appraiser’s opinion of the highest and best use of the larger parcel. It explained the applicable zoning designation of the larger parcel. The City’s offer also summarized the Page 278 Page 8 1 0 9 0 principal transactions relied on by the appraiser to arrive at the appraiser’s opinion of value. In addition, the written offer explained the appraiser’s valuation analysis, including severance damages. It included the City’s comparable market data relied on by the appraiser. Further, the City offered, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1263.025, to pay the record owner the reasonable costs, up to $5,000.00, for an independent appraisal of the approximate 2,655 square foot temporary construction easement area. The City made several attempts to follow up and negotiate with the owner regarding the City’s offer. Based on the timing of the Project, it is necessary for the City Council to consider the adoption of the proposed Resolution of Necessity authorizing the acquisition by eminent domain of the Subject Property Interest needed from the Lightning PM Parcel. 8768 and 8822 Etiwanda Avenue, APNs 0229-131-15, 16 & 26 (SCG of DP Etiwanda Parcel) Pursuant to Government Code Section 7260 et seq., the City of Rancho Cucamonga obtained a fair market value appraisal of the SCG of DP Etiwanda Parcel, and the approximate 8,073 square foot temporary construction easement the City seeks to acquire for a period of 18 months for public use, namely grade separation purposes. The City set just compensation in accordance with the appraised fair market value, and extended a written offer on October 26, 2021, to SCG of DP Etiwanda LLC, the owner of record. The fair market value appraisal used a date of value of October 14, 2021. The City’s written offer included an informational pamphlet describing the eminent domain process and the record owner’s rights under the Eminent Domain Law. In accordance with Government Code Section 7267.2, the City’s written offer contained a written statement of, and summary of the basis for, the amount it established as just compensation. The offer set forth the date of value utilized by the appraiser and explained the appraiser’s opinion of the highest and best use of the larger parcel. It explained the applicable zoning designation of the larger parcel. The City’s offer also summarized the principal transactions relied on by the appraiser to arrive at the appraiser’s opinion of value. In addition, the written offer explained the appraiser’s valuation analysis, including severance damages. It included the City’s comparable market data relied on by the appraiser. Further, the City offered, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1263.025, to pay the record owner the reasonable costs, up to $5,000.00, for an independent appraisal of the approximate 8,073 square foot temporary construction easement area. The City made several attempts to follow up and negotiate with the owner regarding the City’s offer. Based on the timing of the Project, it is necessary for the City Council to consider the adoption of the proposed Resolution of Necessity authorizing the acquisition by eminent domain of the Subject Property Interest needed from the SCG of DP Etiwanda Parcel. 8821 Etiwanda Avenue, APN 0229-162-15 (Jones, Garness & Clemons Parcel) Pursuant to Government Code Section 7260 et seq., the City of Rancho Cucamonga obtained a fair market value appraisal of the Jones, Garness & Clemons Parcel, and the approximate 5,011 square foot temporary construction easement the City seeks to acquire for a period of 18 months for public use, namely grade separation purposes. The City set Page 279 Page 9 1 0 9 0 just compensation in accordance with the appraised fair market value, and extended a written offer on October 26, 2021 to the trustees of the Jones Family Trust, the Garness Family Trust, and the Clemons Revocable Trust, the owners of record. The fair market value appraisal used a date of value of October 14, 2021. The City’s written offer included an informational pamphlet describing the eminent domain process and the record owner’s rights under the Eminent Domain Law. In accordance with Government Code Section 7267.2, the City’s written offer contained a written statement of, and summary of the basis for, the amount it established as just compensation. The offer set forth the date of value utilized by the appraiser and explained the appraiser’s opinion of the highest and best use of the larger parcel. It explained the applicable zoning designation of the larger parcel. The City’s offer also summarized the principal transactions relied on by the appraiser to arrive at the appraiser’s opinion of value. In addition, the written offer explained the appraiser’s valuation analysis, including severance damages. It included the City’s comparable market data relied on by the appraiser. Further, the City offered, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1263.025, to pay the record owner the reasonable costs, up to $5,000.00, for an independent appraisal of the approximate 5,011 square foot temporary construction easement area. The City made several attempts to follow up and negotiate with the owner regarding the City’s offer. Based on the timing of the Project, it is necessary for the City Council to consider the adoption of the proposed Resolution of Necessity authorizing the acquisition by eminent domain of the Subject Property Interest needed from the Jones, Garness & Clemons Parcel. 12521 Arrow Route & 8688 Etiwanda Avenue, (APNs 0229-131-30 & 31) (Goodman Rancho Parcel) Pursuant to Government Code Section 7260 et seq., the City of Rancho Cucamonga obtained a fair market value appraisal of the Goodman Rancho Parcel, and the approximate 1,254 square foot and 4,024 square foot temporary construction easements the City seeks to acquire, each for a period of 30 months, for public use, namely grade separation purposes. The City set just compensation in accordance with the appraised fair market value, and extended a written offer on October 26, 2021 to Goodman Rancho SPE LLC, the owner of record. The fair market value appraisal used a date of value of October 14, 2021. The City’s written offer included an informational pamphlet describing the eminent domain process and the record owner’s rights under the Eminent Domain Law. In accordance with Government Code Section 7267.2, the City’s written offer contained a written statement of, and summary of the basis for, the amount it established as just compensation. The offer set forth the date of value utilized by the appraiser and explained the appraiser’s opinion of the highest and best use of the larger parcel. It explained the applicable zoning designation of the larger parcel. The City’s offer also summarized the principal transactions relied on by the appraiser to arrive at the appraiser’s opinion of value. In addition, the written offer explained the appraiser’s valuation analysis, including severance damages. It included the City’s comparable market data relied on by the appraiser. Further, the City offered, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1263.025, to pay the record owner the reasonable costs, up to $5,000.00, for an Page 280 Page 10 1 0 9 0 independent appraisal of the approximate 1,254 square foot and 4,024 square foot temporary construction easement areas. The City made several attempts to follow up and negotiate with the owner regarding the City’s offer. Based on the timing of the Project, it is necessary for the City Council to consider the adoption of the proposed Resolution of Necessity authorizing the acquisition by eminent domain of the Subject Property Interest needed from the Goodman Rancho Parcel. 8996 Etiwanda Avenue, APN 0229-283-79 (BTC III Parcel) Pursuant to Government Code Section 7260 et seq., the City of Rancho Cucamonga obtained a fair market value appraisal of the BTC III Parcel, the approximate 401 square foot permanent easement, the approximate 14,801 square foot permanent easement, and the approximate 7,936 square foot temporary construction easement with a term of 30 months the City seeks to acquire for public use, namely grade separation purposes. The City set just compensation in accordance with the appraised fair market value, and extended a written offer on December 3, 2021 to BTC III Rancho Cucamonga Logistics Center, LP, the owner of record. The fair market value appraisal used a date of value of October 14, 2021. The City’s written offer included an informational pamphlet describing the eminent domain process and the record owner’s rights under the Eminent Domain Law. In accordance with Government Code Section 7267.2, the City’s written offer contained a written statement of, and summary of the basis for, the amount it established as just compensation. The offer set forth the date of value utilized by the appraiser and explained the appraiser’s opinion of the highest and best use of the larger parcel. It explained the applicable zoning designation of the larger parcel. The City’s offer also summarized the principal transactions relied on by the appraiser to arrive at the appraiser’s opinion of value. In addition, the written offer explained the appraiser’s valuation analysis, including severance damages. It included the City’s comparable market data relied on by the appraiser. Further, the City offered, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1263.025, to pay the record owner the reasonable costs, up to $5,000.00, for an independent appraisal of the approximate 401 square foot permanent easement area, the approximate 14,801 square foot permanent easement area, and the approximate 7,936 square foot temporary construction easement area. The City made several attempts to follow up and negotiate with the owner regarding the City’s offer. Based on the timing of the Project, it is necessary for the City Council to consider the adoption of the proposed Resolution of Necessity authorizing the acquisition by eminent domain of the Subject Property Interests needed from the BTC III Parcel. 8939 Etiwanda Avenue, APN 0229-291-55 (BCORE IE Parcel) Pursuant to Government Code Section 7260 et seq., the City of Rancho Cucamonga obtained a fair market value appraisal of the BCORE IE Parcel, the approximate 1,201 square foot permanent easement and the approximate 1,295 square foot temporary construction easement with a term of 30 months the City seeks to acquire for public use, namely grade separation purposes. The City set just compensation in accordance with the appraised fair market value, and extended a written offer on December 3, 2021 to Page 281 Page 11 1 0 9 0 BCORE IE West Owner, LLC, the owner of record. The fair market value appraisal used a date of value of October 14, 2021. The City’s written offer included an informational pamphlet describing the eminent domain process and the record owner’s rights under the Eminent Domain Law. In accordance with Government Code Section 7267.2, the City’s written offer contained a written statement of, and summary of the basis for, the amount it established as just compensation. The offer set forth the date of value utilized by the appraiser and explained the appraiser’s opinion of the highest and best use of the larger parcel. It explained the applicable zoning designation of the larger parcel. The City’s offer also summarized the principal transactions relied on by the appraiser to arrive at the appraiser’s opinion of value. In addition, the written offer explained the appraiser’s valuation analysis, including severance damages. It included the City’s comparable market data relied on by the appraiser. Further, the City offered, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1263.025, to pay the record owner the reasonable costs, up to $5,000.00, for an independent appraisal of the approximate 1,201 square foot permanent easement area and the approximate 1,295 square foot temporary construction easement area. The City made several attempts to follow up and negotiate with the owner regarding the City’s offer. Based on the timing of the Project, it is necessary for the City Council to consider the adoption of the proposed Resolution of Necessity authorizing the acquisition by eminent domain of the Subject Property Interests needed from the BCORE IE Parcel. 8949 Etiwanda Avenue, APN 0229-291-22 (SCE Parcel) Pursuant to Government Code Section 7260 et seq., the City of Rancho Cucamonga obtained a fair market value appraisal of the SCE Parcel, the approximate 52,464 square foot permanent easement and the approximate 1,972 square foot temporary construction easement with a term of 18 months the City seeks to acquire for public use, namely grade separation purposes. The City set just compensation in accordance with the appraised fair market value, and extended a written offer on November 23, 2021 to Southern California Edison Company, the owner of record. The fair market value appraisal used a date of value of October 14, 2021. The City’s written offer included an informational pamphlet describing the eminent domain process and the record owner’s rights under the Eminent Domain Law. In accordance with Government Code Section 7267.2, the City’s written offer contained a written statement of, and summary of the basis for, the amount it established as just compensation. The offer set forth the date of value utilized by the appraiser and explained the appraiser’s opinion of the highest and best use of the larger parcel. It explained the applicable zoning designation of the larger parcel. The City’s offer also summarized the principal transactions relied on by the appraiser to arrive at the appraiser’s opinion of value. In addition, the written offer explained the appraiser’s valuation analysis, including severance damages. It included the City’s comparable market data relied on by the appraiser. Further, the City offered, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1263.025, to pay the record owner the reasonable costs, up to $5,000.00, for an independent appraisal of the approximate 52,464 square foot permanent easement area and the approximate 1,972 square foot temporary construction easement area. Page 282 Page 12 1 0 9 0 The City made several attempts to follow up and negotiate with the owner regarding the City’s offer. Based on the timing of the Project, it is necessary for the City Council to consider the adoption of the proposed Resolution of Necessity authorizing the acquisition by eminent domain of the Subject Property Interests needed from the SCE Parcel. 8685 to 8821 Etiwanda Avenue & 12928 to 12974 Whittram Avenue, (APNs 0229- 151-15 & 28, 0229-161-01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 19 & 20) (Colombero Parcel) Pursuant to Government Code Section 7260 et seq., the City of Rancho Cucamonga obtained a fair market value appraisal of the Colombero Parcel, the approximate 5,130 square foot permanent easement, the approximate 2,986 square foot maintenance and construction easement, and the approximate 3,192 square foot and the approximate 677 square foot temporary construction easements, each with a term of 30 months, the City seeks to acquire for public use, namely grade separation purposes. The City set just compensation in accordance with the appraised fair market value, and extended a written offer on November 23, 2021 to Colombero Family Limited Partnership, the owner of record. The fair market value appraisal used a date of value of November 10, 2021. The City’s written offer included an informational pamphlet describing the eminent domain process and the record owner’s rights under the Eminent Domain Law. In accordance with Government Code Section 7267.2, the City’s written offer contained a written statement of, and summary of the basis for, the amount it established as just compensation. The offer set forth the date of value utilized by the appraiser and explained the appraiser’s opinion of the highest and best use of the larger parcel. It explained the applicable zoning designation of the larger parcel. The City’s offer also summarized the principal transactions relied on by the appraiser to arrive at the appraiser’s opinion of value. In addition, the written offer explained the appraiser’s valuation analysis, including severance damages. It included the City’s comparable market data relied on by the appraiser. Further, the City offered, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1263.025, to pay the record owner the reasonable costs, up to $5,000.00, for an independent appraisal of the approximate 5,130 square foot permanent easement area, the approximate 2,986 square foot maintenance and construction easement area, the approximate 7,936 square foot temporary construction easement area, and the approximate 677 square foot temporary construction easement area. The City made several attempts to follow up and negotiate with the owner regarding the City’s offer. Based on the timing of the Project, it is necessary for the City Council to consider the adoption of the proposed Resolution of Necessity authorizing the acquisition by eminent domain of the Subject Property Interests needed from the Colombero Parcel. City’s Actions Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1245.235 Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1245.235, the City sent a letter and a notice by first- class mail dated December 22, 2021 to the record owners of each of the Subject Property Interests the City seeks to acquire, informing them of the City’s intent to consider at its January 19, 2022 meeting, the adoption of a resolution of necessity for the acquisition by eminent domain of the Subject Property Interests for each respective parcel. The notices advised the record owners of their right to appear and be heard regarding the City’s proposed adoption of the respective Resolution of Necessity by filing, within fifteen days of the date the notice was mailed, a written request with the City to appear at the hearing. The notices Page 283 Page 13 1 0 9 0 specifically informed the record owners of the Subject Property Interests that they have an opportunity to appear before the City Council and raise questions about whether the public interest and necessity require the Project; whether the Project is planned or located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury; and whether the Subject Property Interest the City seeks to acquire from the owner of record is necessary for the Project. As discussed above, based on the proposed timing of the Project, it is necessary for the City Council to consider the adoption of the proposed Resolutions of Necessity at this time. This hearing relates to issues A, B, C, and D below. REQUIRED FINDINGS FOR ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY A. The Public Interest and Necessity Require the Project The Project, as planned and designed, is in the public interest and necessity and is needed to improve vehicle and rail safety, traffic mobility, and surface transportation. The Project requires the acquisition of additional right of way for the grade separation and related purposes. The Project will widen the portion of Etiwanda Avenue from Napa Street to Whittram Avenue to a four-lane grade separated roadway over the SCRRA/BNSF San Gabriel subdivision, which is currently a two-lane at-grade crossing. The Project will construct an overhead crossing, utilizing walls and embankments to support the raised approaching roadway. It will span the railroad right-of-way and provide access to adjacent properties. The Project includes the addition of a painted median/left turn lane with bike lanes and sidewalks on each side and a northbound right turn lane onto Whittram Avenue. When completed in 2024, the Project will reduce vehicle and truck delays, as well as queuing. It will improve mobility, safety, and level of service at the crossing, and it will provide for the safe transit of pedestrians, bicyclists, vehicles, trucks, and trains. Furthermore, the Project will provide for improved response times in the area for first responders such as police officers, firefighters, paramedics, and emergency medical technicians. Accordingly, the Project will benefit local residents and business and the community as whole. The Plans for the Project are on file with the Engineering Services Department and are incorporated herein by this reference. The Project, as planned and designed, is consistent with the Circulation Element of the General Plan, which designated Etiwanda Avenue as a four-lane major arterial road. Anticipating the future growth of the SCRRA/BNSF corridor, the City’s General Plan identified this area to be grade separated. The City seeks to acquire the Subject Property Interests for public use, namely grade separation and related purposes, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto in connection with the Project. The City seeks to construct the Project to improve mobility, safety, and level of service at the crossing. The Project was planned and located to minimize the impact on the adjacent properties. Because of its scope, the Project requires the acquisition of several permanent easements and temporary construction easements over portions of 10 larger parcels, as well as fee interests in two parcels owned by private property owners. The construction of the Project will require some business/residential Page 284 Page 14 1 0 9 0 relocations. The City will coordinate the construction with the owners of the Subject Property Interests to minimize the impact of the Project on the parcels and to assist those persons and businesses displaced by the Project. Based on the timing of the Project, it is necessary that the City consider the acquisition by eminent domain of the required Subject Property Interests. The public use for which the City seeks to acquire the Subject Property Interests, namely grade separation and related purposes, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto, will not unreasonably interfere with or impair the continuance of the public use to which any easement holders may have appropriated the area (Code of Civil Procedure Section 1240.510). Further, the Project may require the relocation of several utilities to the new right-of-way area. The public use for which the City seeks to acquire the Subject Property Interests, namely grade separation and related purposes, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto, is a more necessary public use within the meaning of Code of Civil Procedure Section 1240.650 than the uses to which public utility easement holders have appropriated any utility easements located on or within the area of the Subject Property Interests that are affected by the Project. Accordingly, the City is authorized to acquire the Subject Property Interests pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Sections 1240.510, 1240.610, and 1240.650. B. The Project is Planned and Located in the Manner that will be Most Compatible with the Greatest Public Good and the Least Private Injury The Project is planned and located in the manner that is most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury. The Project requires the acquisition of additional right of way for grade separation and related purposes. The Project will widen the portion of Etiwanda Avenue from Napa Street to Whittram Avenue to a four-lane grade separated roadway over the SCRR/BNSF San Gabriel subdivision, which is currently a two-lane at-grade crossing. The Project will construct an overhead crossing, utilizing walls and embankments to support the raised approaching roadway. It will span the railroad right-of-way and provide access to adjacent properties. The Project includes the addition of a painted median/left turn lane with bike lanes and sidewalks on each side and a northbound right turn lane onto Whittram Avenue. When completed in 2024, the Project will reduce vehicle and truck delays, as well as queuing. It will improve mobility, safety, and level of service at the crossing, and it will provide for the safe transit of pedestrians, bicyclists, vehicles, trucks, and trains. Furthermore, the Project will provide for improved response times in the area for first responders such as police officers, firefighters, paramedics, and emergency medical technicians. Accordingly, the Project will benefit local residents and business and the community as whole. The Plans for the Project are on file with the Engineering Services Department and are incorporated herein by this reference. The Project was planned and located to minimize the impact on the adjacent properties. Because of its scope, the Project requires the acquisition of several permanent easements and temporary construction easements over portions of 10 Page 285 Page 15 1 0 9 0 larger parcels, as well as fee interests in two parcels owned by private property owners. The construction of the Project will require some business/residential relocations. The City will coordinate the construction with the owners of the Subject Property Interests to minimize the impact of the Project on the parcels and to assist those persons and businesses displaced by the Project. Based on the timing of the Project, it is necessary that the City consider the acquisition by eminent domain of the required Subject Property Interests. Further, the public use for which the City seeks to acquire the Subject Property Interests, namely grade separation and related purposes, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto, will not unreasonably interfere with or impair the continuance of the public use to which any easement holders may have appropriated the area (Code of Civil Procedure Section 1240.510). Further, the Project may require the relocation of several utilities to the new right-of-way area. The public use for which the City seeks to acquire the Subject Property Interests, namely grade separation and related purposes, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto, is a more necessary public use within the meaning of Code of Civil Procedure Section 1240.650 than the uses to which public utility easement holders have appropriated any utility easements located on or within the area of the Subject Property Interests that are affected by the Project. Accordingly, the City is authorized to acquire the Subject Property Interests pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Sections 1240.510, 1240.610, and 1240.650. C. The Subject Property Interests Described in the Resolutions of Necessity are Necessary for the Project The City seeks to construct the Project, as planned and designed, to improve mobility, safety, and level of service at the rail crossing. The Project will widen the portion of Etiwanda Avenue from Napa Street to Whittram Avenue to a four-lane grade separated roadway over the SCRR/BNSF San Gabriel subdivision, which is currently a two-lane at-grade crossing. The Project will construct an overhead crossing, utilizing walls and embankments to support the raised approaching roadway. It will span the railroad right-of-way and provide access to adjacent properties. The Project includes the addition of a painted median/left turn lane with bike lanes and sidewalks on each side and a northbound right turn lane onto Whittram Avenue. When completed in 2024, the Project will reduce vehicle and truck delays, as well as queuing. It will improve mobility, safety, and level of service at the crossing, and it will provide for the safe transit of pedestrians, bicyclists, vehicles, trucks, and trains. Furthermore, the Project will provide for improved response times in the area for first responders such as police officers, firefighters, paramedics, and emergency medical technicians. The City cannot construct the Project without the acquisition of the following Subject Property Interests, which are described more particularly in the Resolutions of Necessity: 8783 Etiwanda Avenue and 12949 Whittram Avenue, APN 0229-162-14 (Kular Truck Line Parcel) Page 286 Page 16 1 0 9 0 A fee simple interest for grade separation purposes, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto in the real property located at 8783 Etiwanda Avenue and 12949 Whittram Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, and identified as San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Number 0229-162-14, which is owned by Kular Truck Line, Inc. 8889 Etiwanda Avenue, APNs 0229-291-17 & 18 (Lightning PM Parcel) An approximate 2,655 square foot temporary construction easement with a term of 18 months for grade separation purposes, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto from the real property located at 8889 Etiwanda Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, and identified as San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 0229-291-17 and 0229-291-18, which is owned by Lightning PM LLC. 8768 and 8822 Etiwanda Avenue, APNs 0229-131-15, 16 & 26 (SCG of DP Etiwanda Parcel) An approximate 8,073 square foot temporary construction easement with a term of 18 months for grade separation purposes, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto from the real property located at 8822 Etiwanda Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, and identified as San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 0229-131-15, 0229-131-16, and 0229- 131-26, which is owned by SCG of DP Etiwanda LLC. 8821 Etiwanda Avenue, APN 0229-162-15 (Jones, Garness & Clemons Parcel) An approximate 5,011 square foot temporary construction easement with a term of 18 months for grade separation purposes, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto from the real property located at 8821 Etiwanda Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, and identified as San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Number 0229-162-15, which is owned by the Jones Family Trust, The Garness Family Trust, and the Clemons Revocable Trust. 12521 Arrow Route & 8688 Etiwanda Avenue, APNs 0229-131-30 & 31 (Goodman Rancho SPE Parcel) Two temporary construction easements, each with a term of 30 months, for grade separation purposes, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto, consisting of approximately 1,254 square feet and approximately 4,024 square feet over portions of the real property located at 12521 Arrow Route and 8688 Etiwanda Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and further identified as San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 0229- 131-30 and 0229-131-31, which is owned by Goodman Rancho SPE LLC. 8996 Etiwanda Avenue, APN 0229-283-79 (BTC III Parcel) An approximate 401 square foot permanent easement, an approximate 14,801 square foot permanent easement, and an approximate 7,936 Page 287 Page 17 1 0 9 0 square foot temporary construction easement with a term of 30 months for grade separation purposes, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto from the real property located at 8996 Etiwanda Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, and identified as San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Number 0229-283-79, which is owned by BTC III Rancho Cucamonga Logistics Center, LP. 8939 Etiwanda Avenue, APN 0229-291-55 (BCORE IE Parcel) An approximate 1,201 square foot permanent easement and an approximate 1,295 square foot temporary construction easement with a term of 30 months for grade separation purposes, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto from the real property located at 8939 Etiwanda Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, and identified as San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Number 0229-291-55, which is owned by BCORE IE West Owner, LLC. 8949 Etiwanda Avenue, APN 0229-291-22 (SCE Parcel) An approximate 52,464 square foot permanent easement and an approximate 1,972 square foot temporary construction easement with a term of 18 months for grade separation purposes, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto from the real property located at 8949 Etiwanda Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, and identified as San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Number 0229-291-22, which is owned by Southern California Edison Company. 8685 to 8821 Etiwanda Avenue & 12928 to 12974 Whittram Avenue, APNs 0229-151-15 & 28, 0229-161-01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 19 & 20 (Colombero Parcel) An approximate 5,130 square foot permanent easement, an approximate 2,986 square foot maintenance and construction easement, and an approximate 3,192 square foot temporary construction easement and an approximate 677 square foot temporary construction easement, each with a term of 30 months, for grade separation purposes, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto from the real property located at 8685 to 8821 Etiwanda Avenue & 12928 to 12974 Whittram Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, and identified as San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 0229-151-15 & 28, 0229-161-01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 19 & 20, which is owned by Colombero Family Limited Partnership. As stated above, the public use for which the City seeks to acquire the Subject Property Interests, namely grade separation and related purposes, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto, will not unreasonably interfere with or impair the continuance of the public use to which any easement holders may have appropriated the area (Code of Civil Procedure Section 1240.510). Further, the Project may require the relocation of several utilities to the new right-of-way area. The public use for which the City seeks to acquire the Subject Property Interests, namely grade separation and related purposes, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto, is a more necessary public use within the meaning of Code of Civil Procedure Section 1240.650 than the uses to which public utility easement Page 288 Page 18 1 0 9 0 holders have appropriated any utility easements located on or within the area of the Subject Property Interests that are affected by the Project. Accordingly, the City is authorized to acquire the Subject Property Interest pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Sections 1240.510, 1240.610, and 1240.650. D. The City has made an offer as required by Government Code Section 7267.2 to each owner of record of the Subject Property Interests The City, pursuant to Government Code Section 7260 et seq., obtained a fair market value appraisal of the Subject Property Interests, set just compensation in accordance with the fair market values and extended written offers to the owners of record of the Subject Property Interests. As detailed above, the City extended to the owners of record of the Subject Property Interests a written offer pursuant to Government Code Section 7267.2 to acquire the Subject Property Interests for public use, namely grade separation and related purposes, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto. Specifically, the City extended written offers to the following record owners of the Subject Property Interests: The City extended a written offer to Kular Truck Lines, Inc. to purchase the fee simple interest for grade separation purposes, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto in the real property located at 8783 Etiwanda Avenue and 12949 Whittram Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, and further identified as San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Number 0229-162-14. The City extended a written offer to Lightning PM LLC to purchase an approximate 2,655 square foot temporary construction easement with a term of 18 months for grade separation purposes, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto from the real property located at 8889 Etiwanda Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, and further identified as San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 0229-291-17 and 0229-291-18. The City extended a written offer to SCG of DP Etiwanda LLC to purchase an approximate 8,073 square foot temporary construction easement with a term of 18 months for grade separation purposes, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto from the real property located at 8768 and 8822 Etiwanda Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, and further identified as San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 0229-131-15, 0229- 131-16, and 0229-131-26. The property owner submitted a letter objecting to the City’s adoption of a Resolution of Necessity on January 4, 2022, a copy of which is attached to this report (Attachment 10). The City extended a written offer to the Jones Family Trust, The Garness Family Trust, and the Clemons Revocable Trust to purchase an approximate 5,011 square foot temporary construction easement with a term of 18 months for grade separation purposes, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto from the real property located at 8821 Etiwanda Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, and further identified as San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Number 0229-162-15. The property owners has accepted the City’s offer and a purchase and sale agreement is being circulated between the City and property owners. However, as of the writing of this report, the purchase and sale agreement has not been executed. Page 289 Page 19 1 0 9 0 The City extended a written offer to Goodman Rancho SPE LLC to purchase two temporary construction easements, each with a term of 30 months, for grade separation purposes, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto, consisting of approximately 1,254 square feet and approximately 4,024 square feet over portions of the real property located at 12521 Arrow Route and 8688 Etiwanda Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and further identified as San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 0229-131-30 and 0229-131-31. The City extended a written offer to BTC III Rancho Cucamonga Logistics Center, LP to purchase an approximate 401 square foot permanent easement, an approximate 14,801 square foot permanent easement, and an approximate 7,936 square foot temporary construction easement with a term of 30 months for grade separation purposes, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto from the real property located at 8996 Etiwanda Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, and further identified as San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Number 0229-283-79. The property owner submitted a letter objecting to the City’s adoption of a Resolution of Necessity on January 3, 2022, a copy of which is attached to this report (Attachment 11). The City extended a written offer to BCORE IE West Owner, LLC to purchase an approximate 1,201 square foot permanent easement and an approximate 1,295 square foot temporary construction easement with a term of 30 months for grade separation purposes, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto from the real property located at 8939 Etiwanda Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, and further identified as San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Number 0229-291-55. The property owner submitted a letter objecting to the City’s adoption of a Resolution of Necessity on January 12, 2022, a copy of which is attached to this report (Attachment 12). The City extended a written offer to Southern California Edison Company to purchase an approximate 52,464 square foot permanent easement and an approximate 1,972 square foot temporary construction easement with a term of 18 months for grade separation purposes, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto from the real property located at 8949 Etiwanda Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, and identified as San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Number 0229-291-22. The property owner submitted a letter objecting to the City’s adoption of a Resolution of Necessity on December 29, 2021, a copy of which is attached to this report (Attachment 13). The City extended a written offer to Colombero Family Limited Partnership to purchase an approximate 5,130 square foot permanent easement, an approximate 2,986 square foot maintenance and construction easement, and an approximate 3,192 square foot temporary construction easement and an approximate 677 square foot temporary construction easement, each with a term of 30 months, for grade separation purposes, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto from the real property located at 8685 to 8821 Etiwanda Avenue & 12928 to 12974 Whittram Avenue, Rancho Page 290 Page 20 1 0 9 0 Cucamonga, and identified as San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 0229-151-15 & 28, 0229-161-01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 19 & 20. The property owners has accepted the City’s offer and a purchase and sale agreement is being circulated between the City and property owners. However, as of the writing of this report, the purchase and sale agreement has not been executed. Incorporation of Above-Referenced Documents: The following documents on file with the City Clerk’s Office and/or the Engineering Services Department, which are referenced in this report, are incorporated herein by this reference: Resolutions of Necessity (attached hereto) City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Offer letters to the record owners of the Subject Property Interests Notice pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1245.235 to each record owner of the Subject Property Interests Grade Separation Plans for Project Environmental Documents relating to Project Notice of Exemption FISCAL IMPACT: The Etiwanda Grade Separation Project is funded by an SB-1 Trade Corridor Enhancement Program (TCEP) grant funds which require construction to begin between July and December 2022. The acquisition of right-of-way for the project is a critical step in meeting the funding deadlines. Anticipated funds needed for acquisition of right-of-way for the project including legal fees will be funded through the TCEP grant funding allocation for the project. COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: The proposed Etiwanda Grade Separation Project will enhance the City’s position as the world class community in our region by improving safety, traffic flow, and access to the southeast industrial area of the City. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 - Resolution No. 2022-008 (Kular Truck Line Parcel) Attachment 2 - Resolution No. 2022-009 (Lightning PM Parcel) Attachment 3 - Resolution No. 2022-010 (SCG of DP Etiwanda Parcel) Attachment 4 - Resolution No. 2022-011 (Jones, Garness & Clemons Parcel) Attachment 5 - Resolution No. 2022-012 (Goodman Rancho SPE Parcel) Attachment 6 - Resolution No. 2022-013 (BTC III Parcel) Attachment 7 - Resolution No. 2022-014 (BCORE IE Parcel) Attachment 8 - Resolution No. 2022-015 (SCE Parcel) Attachment 9 - Resolution No. 2022-016 (Colombero Parcel) Attachment 10 - SCG of DP Etiwanda LLC Objection Letter Attachment 11 - BTC III Rancho Cucamonga Logistics Center, LP Objection Letter Attachment 12 – BCORE IE West Owner LLC Objection Letter Attachment 13 - Southern California Edison Company Objection Letter Page 291 Resolution No. 2022-008 - Page 1 of 7 RESOLUTION NO. 2022-008 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY INTERESTS NECESSARY FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES AND AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION THEREOF IN CONNECTION WITH THE ETIWANDA GRADE SEPARATION PROJECT (FEE SIMPLE INTEREST IN APN 0229-162-14) WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga (“City”) is a municipal corporation in the County of San Bernardino, State of California; and WHEREAS, the City seeks to construct the Etiwanda Grade Separation Project (“Project”). The Project requires the acquisition of additional right of way for grade separation. The Project involves the widening and construction of Etiwanda Avenue as a four-lane grade separated roadway over the Southern California Regional Rail Authority (“SCRRA”)/Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railroad (“BNSF”) San Gabriel subdivision, currently a two-lane at-grade crossing. The Project will construct an overhead crossing, utilizing walls and embankments to support the raised approaching roadway. It will span the railroad right-of-way and provide access to adjacent properties. The Project will widen Etiwanda Avenue to four traffic lanes including a painted median/left turn lane with bike lanes and sidewalks on each side and a northbound right turn lane onto Whittram Avenue. When completed in 2024, the Project will reduce vehicle and truck delays, as well as queuing. It will improve mobility, safety, and level of service at the crossing, and it will provide for the safe transit of pedestrians, bicyclists, vehicles, trucks, and trains. Furthermore, the Project will provide for improved response times in the area for first responders such as police officers, firefighters, paramedics, and emergency medical technicians. All work is consistent with the City’s General Plan of Circulation. The Plans for the Project are on file with the Engineering Services Department and are incorporated herein by this reference; and WHEREAS, the environmental effects of the Project were studied and analyzed pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq., and the CEQA Guidelines, 14 Cal. Code Regs. Section 15000 et seq. (“CEQA Guidelines”). City Staff determined that the Project was statutorily exempt pursuant to CEQA Article 18. Statutory Exemptions, Section 15282. Other Statutory Exemptions, paragraph (g) as a railroad grade separation project which eliminates and existing grade crossing or reconstructs an existing grade separation. The City Council approved the Notice of Exemption and authorized Staff to file the Notice of Exemption with the Office of Planning and Research and the County clerk as specified in Section 21080.13(2) of the Public Resources Code. Said Notice of Exemption was filed with the Office of Planning and Research and with the County of San Bernardino on or about June 11, 2018 in accordance with the statutory requirements; and WHEREAS, in connection with the proposed Resolution of Necessity, on January 19, 2022, City Staff reviewed the environmental documentation prepared in connection with the Project. Pursuant to the criteria of Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines and Section 21166 of the Public Resources Code, City Staff concluded that no substantial changes have occurred in the Project, no substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the Project is undertaken, and that the City has obtained no new information of substantial importance that would require further environmental analysis. These environmental findings are the appropriate findings with respect to the proposed acquisition of the Subject Property Interests. ATTACHMENT 1Page292 Resolution No. 2022-008 - Page 2 of 7 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1. The Rancho Cucamonga City Council adopts Resolution No. 2022-008, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, Declaring Certain Real Property Interests Necessary for Public Purposes and Authorizing the Acquisition Thereof in Connection with the Etiwanda Grade Separation Project (A Fee Simple Interest in APN 0229- 162-14). SECTION 2. The City seeks to acquire by eminent domain the real property interest described below in Section 3 of this Resolution for public use, namely grade separation and related purposes, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto in connection with the Etiwanda Grade Separation Project pursuant to the authority conferred on the City of Rancho Cucamonga to acquire real property by eminent domain by Section 19 of Article 1 of the California Constitution, Government Code Sections 37350, 37350.5, 37351, 40401, and 40404, California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1230.010 et seq. (Eminent Domain Law), including but not limited to Sections 1240.010, 1240.020, 1240.110, 1240.120, 1240.150, 1240.510, 1240.610, 1240.650, and by other provisions of law. SECTION 3. The City seeks to acquire a fee simple interest (Subject Property Interest) in the real property located at 8783 Etiwanda Avenue and 12949 Whittram Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, and identified as San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Number 0229-162- 14 (“Kular Parcel”) in connection with the Project. The Subject Property Interest is described more particularly in Exhibit “A” and depicted on Exhibit “B”, which are attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. SECTION 4. The environmental effects of the acquisition of the Subject Property Interest were studied as an integral part of the environmental review for the Project. In connection with the proposed Resolution of Necessity, on January 19, 2022, City Staff reviewed the environmental documentation prepared in connection with the Project. Pursuant to the criteria of Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines and Section 21166 of the Public Resources Code, City staff concluded that no substantial changes have occurred in the Project, no substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the Project is undertaken, and that the City has obtained no new information of substantial importance that would require further environmental analysis. These environmental findings are the appropriate findings with respect to the proposed acquisition of the Subject Property Interest. SECTION 5. The Project, as planned and designed, is in the public interest and necessity and is needed to improve vehicle and rail safety, traffic mobility, and surface transportation, as more fully explained below: A. The Project requires the acquisition of additional right of way for grade separation. The Project involves the widening and construction of Etiwanda Avenue as a four- lane grade separated roadway over the SCRRA/BNSF San Gabriel subdivision, currently a two- lane at-grade crossing. The Project will construct an overhead crossing, utilizing walls and embankments to support the raised approaching roadway. It will span the railroad right-of-way and provide access to adjacent properties. The Project will widen Etiwanda Avenue to four traffic lanes including a painted median/left turn lane with bike lanes and sidewalks on each side and a northbound right turn lane onto Whittram Avenue. When completed in 2024, the Project will reduce vehicle and truck delays, as well as queuing. It will improve mobility, safety, and level of service at the crossing, and it will provide for the safe transit of pedestrians, bicyclists, vehicles, Page 293 Resolution No. 2022-008 - Page 3 of 7 trucks, and trains. Furthermore, the Project will provide for improved response times in the area for first responders such as police officers, firefighters, paramedics, and emergency medical technicians. All work is consistent with the City’s General Plan of Circulation. B. The Project will reduce vehicle and truck delays, improve safety and level of service at the crossing, and it will provide for the safe transit of pedestrians, bicyclists, vehicles, trucks, and trains. Additionally, the Project will provide for improved response times in the area for first responders such as police officers, firefighters, paramedics, and emergency medical technicians. Accordingly, the Project will benefit the residents and businesses of the City and the community as a whole. C. The Project, as planned and designed, is consistent with the Circulation Element of the General Plan, which designated Etiwanda Avenue as a four-lane major arterial road. Anticipating the future growth of the SCRRA/BNSF corridor, the City’s General Plan identified this area to be grade separated. The City seeks to acquire the Subject Property Interest for public use, namely grade separation and related purposes, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto in connection with the Project. The City seeks to construct the Project to improve mobility, safety, and level of service at the crossing. D. The Project was planned and located to minimize the impact on the adjacent properties. Because of its scope, the Project requires the acquisition of several permanent easements and temporary construction easements over portions of 10 larger parcels, as well as fee interests in two parcels owned by private property owners. The construction of the Project will require some business/residential relocations. The City will coordinate the construction with the owner of the Subject Property Interest to minimize the impact of the Project on the parcel and to assist those persons and businesses displaced by the Project. Based on the timing of the Project, it is necessary that the City consider the acquisition by eminent domain of the required Subject Property Interest. SECTION 6. A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 7260 et seq., the City of Rancho Cucamonga obtained a fair market value appraisal of the Kular Parcel, the fee simple interest the City seeks to acquire for public use, namely grade separation and related purposes, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto. B. The City set just compensation in accordance with the appraised fair market value, and extended a written offer on September 22, 2021 to Kular Truck Line, Inc., the owner of record. The fair market value appraisal used a date of value of July 16, 2021. C. The City’s written offer included an informational pamphlet describing the eminent domain process and the record owner’s rights under the Eminent Domain Law. In accordance with Government Code Section 7267.2, the City’s written offer contained a written statement of, and summary of the basis for, the amount it established as just compensation. The offer set forth the date of value utilized by the appraiser and explained the appraiser’s opinion of the highest and best use of the property. It explained the applicable zoning designation of the parcel. The City’s offer also summarized the principal transactions relied on by the appraiser to arrive at the appraiser’s opinion of value. In addition, the written offer explained the appraiser’s valuation analysis. It included the City’s comparable market data relied on by the appraiser. Further, the City offered, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1263.025, to pay the record owner the reasonable costs, up to $5,000.00, for an independent appraisal of the parcel. Page 294 Resolution No. 2022-008 - Page 4 of 7 SECTION 7. The City provided written notice to the owner of record, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1245.235 of the City Council’s intent to consider the adoption of a Resolution of Necessity for the acquisition of the Subject Property Interest by eminent domain. SECTION 8. The public use for which the City seeks to acquire the Subject Property Interest, namely grade separation and related purposes, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto, will not unreasonably interfere with or impair the continuance of the public use to which any easement holders may have appropriated the area (Code of Civil Procedure Section 1240.510). Further, the Project may require the relocation of several utilities to the new right-of- way area. The public use for which the City seeks to acquire the Subject Property Interest, namely grade separation and related purposes, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto, is a more necessary public use within the meaning of Code of Civil Procedure Section 1240.650 than the uses to which public utility easement holders have appropriated any utility easements located on or within the area of the Subject Property Interest that are affected by the Project. Accordingly, the City is authorized to acquire the Subject Property Interest pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Sections 1240.510, 1240.610, and 1240.650. SECTION 9. Based on the evidence presented at the hearing regarding the Project, including the Agenda Report and documents referenced therein and any oral and written testimony at the hearing, the City Council hereby finds and determines that: A. The public interest and necessity require the Project; B. The Project is planned and located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury; C. The Subject Property Interest described more particularly in Exhibit “A” and depicted on Exhibit “B” hereto, is necessary for the Project; and D. The City has made the offer required by Government Code Section 7267.2 to the record owner of the Subject Property Interest the City seeks to acquire. SECTION 10. The findings and declarations contained in this Resolution are based upon the record before the City Council, including the Agenda Report and all documents referenced therein, all of which are incorporated herein by this reference, and any testimony and/or comments submitted to the City by the record owner and or the owner’s representative(s). These documents include, but are not limited to the City of Rancho Cucamonga’s General Plan, the offer letter sent to the owner pursuant to Government Code Section 7267.2, the notice to the record owner pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1245.235 of the City’s intent to consider the adoption of the Resolution of Necessity, Grade Separation Plans for the Project, and the Notice of Exemption for the Project. SECTION 11. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby authorizes and directs the City Attorney’s Office to take all steps necessary to commence and prosecute legal proceedings in a court of competent jurisdiction to acquire the fee simple interest in the Kular Parcel for the Project. The Subject Property Interest is described more particularly on Exhibit “A” and depicted on Exhibit “B” hereto. SECTION 12. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby authorizes the City Manager to execute all necessary documents in connection with the eminent domain proceeding. Page 295 Resolution No. 2022-008 - Page 5 of 7 SECTION 13. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 19th day of January, 2022. ________________________ L. Dennis Michael, Mayor City of Rancho Cucamonga ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk City of Rancho Cucamonga APPROVED AS TO FORM: Nicholas R. Ghirelli, City Attorney Richards, Watson & Gershon CERTIFICATION: I, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution 2022-008, was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on the 19th day of January, 2022, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ___________________________ Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk City of Rancho Cucamonga, California Page 296 Order No: 09207891-920-CMM-CM8 EXHIBIT "A" All that certain real property situated in the County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as follows: PORTIONS OF LOTS 437 AND 438 OF THE FONTANA ARROW ROUTE TRACT NO. 2102, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 31, PAGE(S) 11 TO 15 INCLUSIVE OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, LYING WESTERLY OF A LINE HEREAFTER REFERRED TO AS LINE "A" BEARING SOUTH 5 DEGREES 49 MINUTES 55 SECONDS WEST FROM A POINT ON THE CENTER LINE OF WHITTRAM AVENUE AND 132.00 FEET WESTERLY ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 438 TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 438 AND 184.03 FEET WESTERLY OF THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 438, SAID PORTIONS OF LOTS 437 AND 438, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT BEING AT THE CENTER LINE INTERSECTIONS OF ETIWANDA AVENUE AND WHITTRAM AVENUE; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 22 MINUTES 00 SECONDS WEST ALONG THE CENTER LINE OF ETIWANDA AVENUE 242.61 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 21 MINUTES 54 SECONDS EAST 524.63 FEET TO A POINT ON LINE "A"; THENCE NORTH 5 DEGREES 49 MINUTES 55 SECONDS EAST ALONG LINE "A" 255.49 FEET TO A POINT ON THE CENTER LINE OF WHITTRAM AVENUE; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 24 MINUTES 00 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID CENTER LINE 549.04 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID LAND IS ALSO DESCRIBED AS PARCEL "A" ON CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE FOR LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 269, RECORDED FEBRUARY 18, 1988 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 88-048704 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. Assessor's Parcel Number: 0229-162-14 Exhibit A Order No: 09207891-920-CMM-CM8 EXHIBIT “A” All that certain real property situated in the County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as follows: PORTIONS OF LOTS 437 AND 438 OF THE FONTANA ARROW ROUTE TRACT NO. 2102, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 31, PAGE(S) 11 TO 15 INCLUSIVE OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, LYING WESTERLY OF A LINE HEREAFTER REFERRED TO AS LINE "A" BEARING SOUTH 5 DEGREES 49 MINUTES 55 SECONDS WEST FROM A POINT ON THE CENTER LINE OF WHITTRAM AVENUE AND 132.00 FEET WESTERLY ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 438 TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 438 AND 184.03 FEET WESTERLY OF THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 438, SAID PORTIONS OF LOTS 437 AND 438, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT BEING AT THE CENTER LINE INTERSECTIONS OF ETIWANDA AVENUE AND WHITTRAM AVENUE; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 22 MINUTES 00 SECONDS WEST ALONG THE CENTER LINE OF ETIWANDA AVENUE 242.61 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 21 MINUTES 54 SECONDS EAST 524.63 FEET TO A POINT ON LINE "A"; THENCE NORTH 5 DEGREES 49 MINUTES 55 SECONDS EAST ALONG LINE "A" 255.49 FEET TO A POINT ON THE CENTER LINE OF WHITTRAM AVENUE; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 24 MINUTES 00 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID CENTER LINE 549.04 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID LAND IS ALSO DESCRIBED AS PARCEL "A" ON CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE FOR LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 269, RECORDED FEBRUARY 18, 1988 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 88-048704 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. Assessor’s Parcel Number:0229-162-14 Resolution No. 2022-008 - Page 6 of 7 Page 297 THIS MAP IS fOR THE PURPOSE OF ha VALOREM TAXATION ONLY. February 2004 Ptn. Fontana Arrow Route Tract No. 2102 15%, M.B. 31/11 - - 1701 IC5 ei 100 a (106.4%) WH I UR Ali- - • -> 435 • 10 10 61 City of Rancho Cucamonga Tax Rate Area 15026 15028 he • 8 iM 434 tl 43 I 1 0 AP 2 9 Lc I.R.A. 110.04 438 01) .0 50 433 11 15071 15076 439 3.4 AL 3.15 AVENUE - 0229— 1 6 30 I LiJ 440 IJ RAP 1114-51-71 /716. 74R. %O. 21, 16 PLAT MAP Ptn. Sec. 9 T.1S., R.6W. 17 YAP 104 -35 -II (.24 PIN, PAO MO. 1" • 100 ' C 60 o o. o o o to ry) " Cp 03 CD 0) 0 C DS 0 0 .Cr 03 CA 0101510 07770/09 69 PLAT MAP EXHIBIT “B”Resolution No. 2022-008 - Page 7 of 7 &nbsp;&nbsp;Page 298 Resolution No. 2022-009 - Page 1 of 10 RESOLUTION NO. 2022-009 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY INTERESTS NECESSARY FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES AND AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION THEREOF IN CONNECTION WITH THE ETIWANDA GRADE SEPARATION PROJECT (TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT OVER A PORTION OF APNS 0229-291-17 & 18) WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga (“City”) is a municipal corporation in the County of San Bernardino, State of California; and WHEREAS, the City seeks to construct the Etiwanda Grade Separation Project (“Project”). The Project requires the acquisition of additional right of way for grade separation. The Project involves the widening and construction of Etiwanda Avenue as a four-lane grade separated roadway over the Southern California Regional Rail Authority (“SCRRA”)/Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railroad (“BNSF”) San Gabriel subdivision, currently a two-lane at-grade crossing. The Project will construct an overhead crossing, utilizing walls and embankments to support the raised approaching roadway. It will span the railroad right-of-way and provide access to adjacent properties. The Project will widen Etiwanda Avenue to four traffic lanes including a painted median/left turn lane with bike lanes and sidewalks on each side and a northbound right turn lane onto Whittram Avenue. When completed in 2024, the Project will reduce vehicle and truck delays, as well as queuing. It will improve mobility, safety, and level of service at the crossing, and it will provide for the safe transit of pedestrians, bicyclists, vehicles, trucks, and trains. Furthermore, the Project will provide for improved response times in the area for first responders such as police officers, firefighters, paramedics, and emergency medical technicians. All work is consistent with the City’s General Plan of Circulation. The Plans for the Project are on file with the Engineering Services Department and are incorporated herein by this reference; and WHEREAS, the environmental effects of the Project were studied and analyzed pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq., and the CEQA Guidelines, 14 Cal. Code Regs. Section 15000 et seq. (“CEQA Guidelines”). City Staff determined that the Project was statutorily exempt pursuant to CEQA Article 18. Statutory Exemptions, Section 15282. Other Statutory Exemptions, paragraph (g) as a railroad grade separation project which eliminates and existing grade crossing or reconstructs an existing grade separation. The City Council approved the Notice of Exemption and authorized Staff to file the Notice of Exemption with the Office of Planning and Research and the County clerk as specified in Section 21080.13(2) of the Public Resources Code. Said Notice of Exemption was filed with the Office of Planning and Research and with the County of San Bernardino on or about June 11, 2018 in accordance with the statutory requirements; and WHEREAS, in connection with the proposed Resolution of Necessity, on January 19, 2022, City Staff reviewed the environmental documentation prepared in connection with the Project. Pursuant to the criteria of Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines and Section 21166 of the Public Resources Code, City Staff concluded that no substantial changes have occurred in the Project, no substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the Project is undertaken, and that the City has obtained no new information of substantial importance that would require further environmental analysis. These environmental findings are the appropriate findings with respect to the proposed acquisition of the Subject Property Interests. ATTACHMENT 2Page299 Resolution No. 2022-009 - Page 2 of 10 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1. The Rancho Cucamonga City Council adopts Resolution 2022-009, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, Declaring Certain Real Property Interests Necessary for Public Purposes and Authorizing the Acquisition Thereof in Connection with the Etiwanda Grade Separation Project (A temporary construction easement on a portion of APNs 0229-291-17 & 18). SECTION 2. The City seeks to acquire by eminent domain the real property interest described below in Section 3 of this Resolution for public use, namely grade separation and related purposes, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto in connection with the Etiwanda Grade Separation Project pursuant to the authority conferred on the City of Rancho Cucamonga to acquire real property by eminent domain by Section 19 of Article 1 of the California Constitution, Government Code Sections 37350, 37350.5, 37351, 40401, and 40404, California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1230.010 et seq. (Eminent Domain Law), including but not limited to Sections 1240.010, 1240.020, 1240.110, 1240.120, 1240.150, 1240.510, 1240.610, 1240.650, and by other provisions of law. SECTION 3. The City seeks to acquire an approximate 2,655 square foot temporary construction easement with a term of 18 months (“Subject Property Interest”) over a portion of the real property located at 8889 Etiwanda Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, and identified as San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 0229-291-17 and 0229-291-18 (“Lightning PM Parcel”) in connection with the Project. The Subject Property Interest is described more particularly in Exhibit “A” and depicted on Exhibit “B”, which are attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. SECTION 4. The environmental effects of the acquisition of the Subject Property Interest were studied as an integral part of the environmental review for the Project. In connection with the proposed Resolution of Necessity, on January 19, 2022, City Staff reviewed the environmental documentation prepared in connection with the Project. Pursuant to the criteria of Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines and Section 21166 of the Public Resources Code, City staff concluded that no substantial changes have occurred in the Project, no substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the Project is undertaken, and that the City has obtained no new information of substantial importance that would require further environmental analysis. These environmental findings are the appropriate findings with respect to the proposed acquisition of the Subject Property Interest. SECTION 5. The Project, as planned and designed, is in the public interest and necessity and is needed to improve vehicle and rail safety, traffic mobility, and surface transportation, as more fully explained below: A. The Project requires the acquisition of additional right of way for grade separation. The Project involves the widening and construction of Etiwanda Avenue as a four- lane grade separated roadway over the SCRRA/BNSF San Gabriel subdivision, currently a two- lane at-grade crossing. The Project will construct an overhead crossing, utilizing walls and embankments to support the raised approaching roadway. It will span the railroad right-of-way and provide access to adjacent properties. The Project will widen Etiwanda Avenue to four traffic lanes including a painted median/left turn lane with bike lanes and sidewalks on each side and a northbound right turn lane onto Whittram Avenue. When completed in 2024, the Project will reduce vehicle and truck delays, as well as queuing. It will improve mobility, safety, and level of Page 300 Resolution No. 2022-009 - Page 3 of 10 service at the crossing, and it will provide for the safe transit of pedestrians, bicyclists, vehicles, trucks, and trains. Furthermore, the Project will provide for improved response times in the area for first responders such as police officers, firefighters, paramedics, and emergency medical technicians. All work is consistent with the City’s General Plan of Circulation. B. The Project will reduce vehicle and truck delays, improve safety and level of service at the crossing, and it will provide for the safe transit of pedestrians, bicyclists, vehicles, trucks, and trains. Additionally, the Project will provide for improved response times in the area for first responders such as police officers, firefighters, paramedics, and emergency medical technicians. Accordingly, the Project will benefit the residents and businesses of the City and the community as a whole. C. The Project, as planned and designed, is consistent with the Circulation Element of the General Plan, which designated Etiwanda Avenue as a four-lane major arterial road. Anticipating the future growth of the SCRRA/BNSF corridor, the City’s General Plan identified this area to be grade separated. The City seeks to acquire the Subject Property Interest for public use, namely grade separation and related purposes, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto in connection with the Project. The City seeks to construct the Project to improve mobility, safety, and level of service at the crossing. D. The Project was planned and located to minimize the impact on the adjacent properties. Because of its scope, the Project requires the acquisition of several permanent easements and temporary construction easements over portions of 10 larger parcels, as well as fee interests in two parcels owned by private property owners. The construction of the Project will require some business/residential relocations. The City will coordinate the construction with the owner of the Subject Property Interest to minimize the impact of the Project on the parcel. Based on the timing of the Project, it is necessary that the City consider the acquisition by eminent domain of the required Subject Property Interest. SECTION 6. A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 7260 et seq., the City of Rancho Cucamonga obtained a fair market value appraisal of the Lightning PM Parcel, the approximate 2,655 square foot temporary construction easement the City seeks to acquire for a period of 18 months for public use, namely grade separation and related purposes, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto. B. The City set just compensation in accordance with the appraised fair market value, and extended a written offer on October 26, 2021 to Lightning PM LLC, the owner of record. The fair market value appraisal used a date of value of October 14, 2021. C. The City’s written offer included an informational pamphlet describing the eminent domain process and the record owner’s rights under the Eminent Domain Law. In accordance with Government Code Section 7267.2, the City’s written offer contained a written statement of, and summary of the basis for, the amount it established as just compensation. The offer set forth the date of value utilized by the appraiser and explained the appraiser’s opinion of the highest and best use of the larger parcel. It explained the applicable zoning designation of the larger parcel. The City’s offer also summarized the principal transactions relied on by the appraiser to arrive at the appraiser’s opinion of value. In addition, the written offer explained the appraiser’s valuation analysis, including severance damages. It included the City’s comparable market data relied on by the appraiser. Further, the City offered, pursuant to Code of Civil Page 301 Resolution No. 2022-009 - Page 4 of 10 Procedure Section 1263.025, to pay the record owner the reasonable costs, up to $5,000.00, for an independent appraisal of the approximate 2,655 square foot temporary construction easement area. SECTION 7. The City provided written notice to the owner of record, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1245.235 of the City Council’s intent to consider the adoption of a Resolution of Necessity for the acquisition of the Subject Property Interest by eminent domain. SECTION 8. The public use for which the City seeks to acquire the Subject Property Interest, namely grade separation and related purposes, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto, will not unreasonably interfere with or impair the continuance of the public use to which any easement holders may have appropriated the area (Code of Civil Procedure Section 1240.510). Further, the Project may require the relocation of several utilities to the new right-of- way area. The public use for which the City seeks to acquire the Subject Property Interest, namely grade separation and related purposes, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto, is a more necessary public use within the meaning of Code of Civil Procedure Section 1240.650 than the uses to which public utility easement holders have appropriated any utility easements located on or within the area of the Subject Property Interest that are affected by the Project. Accordingly, the City is authorized to acquire the Subject Property Interest pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Sections 1240.510, 1240.610, and 1240.650. SECTION 9. Based on the evidence presented at the hearing regarding the Project, including the Agenda Report and documents referenced therein and any oral and written testimony at the hearing, the City Council hereby finds and determines that: A. The public interest and necessity require the Project; B. The Project is planned and located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury; C. The Subject Property Interest described more particularly in Exhibit “A” and depicted on Exhibit “B” hereto, is necessary for the Project; and D. The City has made the offer required by Government Code Section 7267.2 to the record owner of the Subject Property Interest the City seeks to acquire. SECTION 10. The findings and declarations contained in this Resolution are based upon the record before the City Council, including the Agenda Report and all documents referenced therein, all of which are incorporated herein by this reference, and any testimony and/or comments submitted to the City by the record owner and or the owner’s representative(s). These documents include, but are not limited to the City of Rancho Cucamonga’s General Plan, the offer letter sent to the owner pursuant to Government Code Section 7267.2, the notice to the record owner pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1245.235 of the City’s intent to consider the adoption of the Resolution of Necessity, Grade Separation Plans for the Project, and the Notice of Exemption for the Project. SECTION 11. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby authorizes and directs the City Attorney’s Office to take all steps necessary to commence and prosecute legal proceedings in a court of competent jurisdiction to acquire an approximate 2,655 square foot temporary construction easement for a period of 18 months for the Project. The Subject Property Interest is described more particularly on Exhibit “A” and depicted on Exhibit “B” hereto. Page 302 Resolution No. 2022-009 - Page 5 of 10 SECTION 12. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby authorizes the City Manager to execute all necessary documents in connection with the eminent domain proceeding. SECTION 13. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 19th day of January, 2022. ________________________ L. Dennis Michael, Mayor City of Rancho Cucamonga ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk City of Rancho Cucamonga APPROVED AS TO FORM: Nicholas R. Ghirelli, City Attorney Richards, Watson & Gershon CERTIFICATION: I, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution 2022-009, was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on the 19th day of January, 2022, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ___________________________ Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk City of Rancho Cucamonga, California Page 303 EXHIBIT A EXHIBIT A Resolution No. 2022-009 - Page 6 of 10 Page 304 Exhibit A Legal Description Etiwanda Grade Separation Project APN 229-291-17 / Lightning P.M., LLC Temporary Construction Easement Page 1 of 1 Pages A portion of that certain parcel, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, as described in the Grant Deed recorded April 17, 2018, as Document No. 2018-0137215 of Official Records, records of said County, described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the north line of the land described in said Grant Deed with the east line of Etiwanda Avenue, fifty (50) foot half-width, as described in the Easement Deed recorded April 17, 1998 as Document No. 19980145780 of Official Records of said County, as both are shown on Sheet 8 of Record of Survey 19-0109 filed in Book 168, Pages 53 through 63 of Record of Surveys, records of said County; Thence 15t, along the north line of said land, N 87)35'05" E, a distance of 24.02 feet to a line parallel with, and lying 24.00 feet easterly of, said east line of Etiwanda Avenue; Thence 2nd, leaving said north line, and along said parallel line, S 00Y07'00" W, a distance of 111.07 feet; Thence 3rd, leaving said parallel line, N 89)53'00" W, a distance of 24.00 feet to said east line of Etiwanda Avenue; Thence 4th, along said east line, N 00Y07'00" E, a distance of 110.15 feet to the Point of Beginning. Containing 2,655 square feet, more or less. Notes The above legal description is based on the dimensions, information, and land references shown on Record of Survey 19-0109 filed in Book 168, Pages 53 through 63 of Record of Surveys. ( Bearings and distances are referenced to the California Coordinate System, Zone 5 grid, NAD83(2011) CSRS Epoch 2017.50. To obtain ground level distances, multiply grid distances by 1.000060364. This descripti Surveyors Act. repared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land 10-04-2021 Justin P. Height, LS 6167 Dam to Job No. 0618-00016 Lightning P.M., LLC :••••• GUIDA • • .•• :....: SURVEYING INC. Exhibit A Legal Description Etiwanda Grade Separation Project APN 229-291-17 / Lightning Temporary Construction Easement Page 1 of 1 Pages Job No. 0618-00016 Lightning TCE.docx 10-04-2021 A portion of that certain parcel, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, as described in the Grant Deed recorded April 17, 2018, as Document No. 2018-0137215 of Official Records, records of said County, described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the north line of the land described in said Grant Deed with the east line of Etiwanda Avenue, fifty (50) foot half-width, as described in the Easement Deed recorded April 17, 1998 as Document No. 19980145780 of Official Records of said County, as both are shown on Sheet 8 of Record of Survey 19-0109 filed in Book 168, Pages 53 through 63 of Record of Surveys, records of said County; Thence 1st, along the north line of said land, N 87°55’05” E, a distance of 24.02 feet to a line parallel with, and lying 24.00 feet easterly of, said east line of Etiwanda Avenue; Thence 2nd, leaving said north line, and along said parallel line, S 00°07’00” W, a distance of 111.07 feet; Thence 3rd, leaving said parallel line, N 89°53’00” W, a distance of 24.00 feet to said east line of Etiwanda Avenue; Thence 4th, along said east line, N 00°07’00” E, a distance of 110.15 feet to the Point of Beginning. Containing 2,655 square feet, more or less. Notes ·The above legal description is based on the dimensions, information, and land references shown on Record of Survey 19-0109 filed in Book 168, Pages 53 through 63 of Record of Surveys. · Bearings and distances are referenced to the California Coordinate System, Zone 5 grid, NAD83(2011) CSRS Epoch 2017.50. To obtain ground level distances, multiply grid distances by 1.000060364. This description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land Surveyors Act. __________________________________________ Justin P. Height, PLS 6167 Dam te APN 229-291-17 / Lightning P.M., LLC Job No. 0618-00016 Lightning P.M., LLC Resolution No. 2022-009 - Page 7 of 10 Page 305 EXHIBIT B EXHIBIT B Resolution No. 2022-009 - Page 8 of 10 Page 306 NOTES ETIWANDA AVENUE 30' 50' 50' SBCTA RAIL CORRIDOR PARDEL 1 ; LLA 501; 003. NO 2002-0026839 OR NORTH LINE OF LAND DESCRIBED IN DOC. NO. 2018-0137215 OR TEMP. CONST. EASEMENT 2,655 SQ. FT. (SEE PAGE 2) OCC., NC., 2012-0137/215 C.H EAST LINE OF t. I IWANDA AVE PER EASEMENT DEED DOC. NO. 19980145780 OR 40' GUIDA SURVEYING INC. 2866 C.,.H., 305 THIS PLAT HAS BEEN PREPARED BY ME, OR UNDER MY DI CTION, IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE PRC FES L LAND SURVEYORS ACT. 10-04-2021 Job No. 0618-00016 JUSTIN P. HEIGHT, PLS 6167 DATE PLAT MAP IS BASED ON THE INFORMATION AND LAND REFERENCES SHOWN ON RECORD OF SURVEY 19-0109 FILED IN BOOK 168, PAGES 53 THROUGH 63 OF RECORD OF SURVEYS. BEARINGS AND DISTANCES ARE REFERENCED TO THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM, ZONE 5 GRID, NAD83(2011) CSRS EPOCH 2017.50. TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES, MULTIPLY GRID DISTANCES BY 1.000060364. SCALE: 1"=.100' Exhibit B Plat Map Etiwanda Grade Separation Project APN 229-291-17 / Lightning P.M., LLC Temporary Construction Easement Page 1 of 2 Pages APN 229-291-17 / Lightning P.M., LLCResolution No. 2022-009 - Page 9 of 10 &nbsp;&nbsp;Page 307 0 ro Umml if' GUI DA Um.. .9.9.9 SURVEYING INC. Job No. 0618-00016 NORTH LINE OF LAND DESCRIBED IN DOC. NO. 201 8-01 3721 5 OR 0 LU EAST LINE OF EI IWANDA AVE PER EASEMENT DEED DOC. NO. 19980145780 OR ETRA/ANDA AVENUE SCALE: 1"=20' 0 LU Exhibit B Plat Map Etiwanda Grade Separation Project APN 229-291-17 / Lightning P.M., LLC Temporary Construction Easement Page 2 of 2 Pages APN 229-291-17 / Lightning P.M., LLCResolution No. 2022-009 - Page 10 of 10 &nbsp;&nbsp;Page 308 Resolution No. 2022-010 - Page 1 of 9 RESOLUTION NO. 2022-010 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY INTERESTS NECESSARY FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES AND AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION THEREOF IN CONNECTION WITH THE ETIWANDA GRADE SEPARATION PROJECT (TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT OVER A PORTION OF APNS 0229-131-15, 16 & 26) WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga (“City”) is a municipal corporation in the County of San Bernardino, State of California; and WHEREAS, the City seeks to construct the Etiwanda Grade Separation Project (“Project”). The Project requires the acquisition of additional right of way for grade separation. The Project involves the widening and construction of Etiwanda Avenue as a four-lane grade separated roadway over the Southern California Regional Rail Authority (“SCRRA”)/Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railroad (“BNSF”) San Gabriel subdivision, currently a two-lane at-grade crossing. The Project will construct an overhead crossing, utilizing walls and embankments to support the raised approaching roadway. It will span the railroad right-of-way and provide access to adjacent properties. The Project will widen Etiwanda Avenue to four traffic lanes including a painted median/left turn lane with bike lanes and sidewalks on each side and a northbound right turn lane onto Whittram Avenue. When completed in 2024, the Project will reduce vehicle and truck delays, as well as queuing. It will improve mobility, safety, and level of service at the crossing, and it will provide for the safe transit of pedestrians, bicyclists, vehicles, trucks, and trains. Furthermore, the Project will provide for improved response times in the area for first responders such as police officers, firefighters, paramedics, and emergency medical technicians. All work is consistent with the City’s General Plan of Circulation. The Plans for the Project are on file with the Engineering Services Department and are incorporated herein by this reference; and WHEREAS, the environmental effects of the Project were studied and analyzed pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq., and the CEQA Guidelines, 14 Cal. Code Regs. Section 15000 et seq. (“CEQA Guidelines”). City Staff determined that the Project was statutorily exempt pursuant to CEQA Article 18. Statutory Exemptions, Section 15282. Other Statutory Exemptions, paragraph (g) as a railroad grade separation project which eliminates and existing grade crossing or reconstructs an existing grade separation. The City Council approved the Notice of Exemption and authorized Staff to file the Notice of Exemption with the Office of Planning and Research and the County clerk as specified in Section 21080.13(2) of the Public Resources Code. Said Notice of Exemption was filed with the Office of Planning and Research and with the County of San Bernardino on or about June 11, 2018 in accordance with the statutory requirements; and WHEREAS, in connection with the proposed Resolution of Necessity, on January 19, 2022, City Staff reviewed the environmental documentation prepared in connection with the Project. Pursuant to the criteria of Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines and Section 21166 of the Public Resources Code, City Staff concluded that no substantial changes have occurred in the Project, no substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the Project is undertaken, and that the City has obtained no new information of substantial importance that would require further environmental analysis. These environmental findings are the appropriate findings with respect to the proposed acquisition of the Subject Property Interests. ATTACHMENT 3Page309 Resolution No. 2022-010 - Page 2 of 9 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1. The Rancho Cucamonga City Council adopts Resolution No. 2022-010, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, Declaring Certain Real Property Interests Necessary for Public Purposes and Authorizing the Acquisition Thereof in Connection with the Etiwanda Grade Separation Project (A temporary construction easement on a portion of APNs 0229-131-15, 16 & 26). SECTION 2. The City seeks to acquire by eminent domain the real property interest described below in Section 3 of this Resolution for public use, namely grade separation and related purposes, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto in connection with the Etiwanda Grade Separation Project pursuant to the authority conferred on the City of Rancho Cucamonga to acquire real property by eminent domain by Section 19 of Article 1 of the California Constitution, Government Code Sections 37350, 37350.5, 37351, 40401, and 40404, California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1230.010 et seq. (Eminent Domain Law), including but not limited to Sections 1240.010, 1240.020, 1240.110, 1240.120, 1240.150, 1240.510, 1240.610, 1240.650, and by other provisions of law. SECTION 3. The City seeks to acquire an approximate 8,073 square foot temporary construction easement with a term of 18 months (“Subject Property Interest”) over a portion of the real property located at 8768 and 8822 Etiwanda Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, and identified as San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 0229-131-15, 0229-131-16, and 0229- 131-26 (“SCG of DP Etiwanda Parcel”) in connection with the Project. The Subject Property Interest is described more particularly in Exhibit “A” and depicted on Exhibit “B”, which are attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. SECTION 4. The environmental effects of the acquisition of the Subject Property Interest were studied as an integral part of the environmental review for the Project. In connection with the proposed Resolution of Necessity, on January 19, 2022, City Staff reviewed the environmental documentation prepared in connection with the Project. Pursuant to the criteria of Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines and Section 21166 of the Public Resources Code, City staff concluded that no substantial changes have occurred in the Project, no substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the Project is undertaken, and that the City has obtained no new information of substantial importance that would require further environmental analysis. These environmental findings are the appropriate findings with respect to the proposed acquisition of the Subject Property Interest. SECTION 5. The Project, as planned and designed, is in the public interest and necessity and is needed to improve vehicle and rail safety, traffic mobility, and surface transportation, as more fully explained below: A. The Project requires the acquisition of additional right of way for grade separation. The Project involves the widening and construction of Etiwanda Avenue as a four- lane grade separated roadway over the SCRRA/BNSF San Gabriel subdivision, currently a two- lane at-grade crossing. The Project will construct an overhead crossing, utilizing walls and embankments to support the raised approaching roadway. It will span the railroad right-of-way and provide access to adjacent properties. The Project will widen Etiwanda Avenue to four traffic lanes including a painted median/left turn lane with bike lanes and sidewalks on each side and a northbound right turn lane onto Whittram Avenue. When completed in 2024, the Project will reduce vehicle and truck delays, as well as queuing. It will improve mobility, safety, and level of Page 310 Resolution No. 2022-010 - Page 3 of 9 service at the crossing, and it will provide for the safe transit of pedestrians, bicyclists, vehicles, trucks, and trains. Furthermore, the Project will provide for improved response times in the area for first responders such as police officers, firefighters, paramedics, and emergency medical technicians. All work is consistent with the City’s General Plan of Circulation. B. The Project will reduce vehicle and truck delays, improve safety and level of service at the crossing, and it will provide for the safe transit of pedestrians, bicyclists, vehicles, trucks, and trains. Additionally, the Project will provide for improved response times in the area for first responders such as police officers, firefighters, paramedics, and emergency medical technicians. Accordingly, the Project will benefit the residents and businesses of the City and the community as a whole. C. The Project, as planned and designed, is consistent with the Circulation Element of the General Plan, which designated Etiwanda Avenue as a four-lane major arterial road. Anticipating the future growth of the SCRRA/BNSF corridor, the City’s General Plan identified this area to be grade separated. The City seeks to acquire the Subject Property Interest for public use, namely grade separation and related purposes, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto in connection with the Project. The City seeks to construct the Project to improve mobility, safety, and level of service at the crossing. D. The Project was planned and located to minimize the impact on the adjacent properties. Because of its scope, the Project requires the acquisition of several permanent easements and temporary construction easements over portions of 10 larger parcels, as well as fee interests in two parcels owned by private property owners. The construction of the Project will require some business/residential relocations. The City will coordinate the construction with the owner of the Subject Property Interest to minimize the impact of the Project on the parcel. Based on the timing of the Project, it is necessary that the City consider the acquisition by eminent domain of the required Subject Property Interest. SECTION 6. A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 7260 et seq., the City of Rancho Cucamonga obtained a fair market value appraisal of the SCG of DP Etiwanda Parcel, the approximate 8,073 square foot temporary construction easement the City seeks to acquire for a period of 18 months for public use, namely grade separation and related purposes, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto. B. The City set just compensation in accordance with the appraised fair market value, and extended a written offer on October 26, 2021 to SCG of DP Etiwanda LLC, the owner of record. The fair market value appraisal used a date of value of October 14, 2021. C. The City’s written offer included an informational pamphlet describing the eminent domain process and the record owner’s rights under the Eminent Domain Law. In accordance with Government Code Section 7267.2, the City’s written offer contained a written statement of, and summary of the basis for, the amount it established as just compensation. The offer set forth the date of value utilized by the appraiser and explained the appraiser’s opinion of the highest and best use of the larger parcel. It explained the applicable zoning designation of the larger parcel. The City’s offer also summarized the principal transactions relied on by the appraiser to arrive at the appraiser’s opinion of value. In addition, the written offer explained the appraiser’s valuation analysis, including severance damages. It included the City’s comparable market data relied on by the appraiser. Further, the City offered, pursuant to Code of Civil Page 311 Resolution No. 2022-010 - Page 4 of 9 Procedure Section 1263.025, to pay the record owner the reasonable costs, up to $5,000.00, for an independent appraisal of the approximate 8,073 square foot temporary construction easement area. SECTION 7. The City provided written notice to the owner of record, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1245.235 of the City Council’s intent to consider the adoption of a Resolution of Necessity for the acquisition of the Subject Property Interest by eminent domain. SECTION 8. The public use for which the City seeks to acquire the Subject Property Interest, namely grade separation and related purposes, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto, will not unreasonably interfere with or impair the continuance of the public use to which any easement holders may have appropriated the area (Code of Civil Procedure Section 1240.510). Further, the Project may require the relocation of several utilities to the new right-of- way area. The public use for which the City seeks to acquire the Subject Property Interest, namely grade separation and related purposes, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto, is a more necessary public use within the meaning of Code of Civil Procedure Section 1240.650 than the uses to which public utility easement holders have appropriated any utility easements located on or within the area of the Subject Property Interest that are affected by the Project. Accordingly, the City is authorized to acquire the Subject Property Interest pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Sections 1240.510, 1240.610, and 1240.650. SECTION 9. Based on the evidence presented at the hearing regarding the Project, including the Agenda Report and documents referenced therein and any oral and written testimony at the hearing, the City Council hereby finds and determines that: A. The public interest and necessity require the Project; B. The Project is planned and located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury; C. The Subject Property Interest described more particularly in Exhibit “A” and depicted on Exhibit “B” hereto, is necessary for the Project; and D. The City has made the offer required by Government Code Section 7267.2 to the record owner of the Subject Property Interest the City seeks to acquire. SECTION 10. The findings and declarations contained in this Resolution are based upon the record before the City Council, including the Agenda Report and all documents referenced therein, all of which are incorporated herein by this reference, and any testimony and/or comments submitted to the City by the record owner and or the owner’s representative(s). These documents include, but are not limited to the City of Rancho Cucamonga’s General Plan, the offer letter sent to the owner pursuant to Government Code Section 7267.2, the notice to the record owner pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1245.235 of the City’s intent to consider the adoption of the Resolution of Necessity, Grade Separation Plans for the Project, and the Notice of Exemption for the Project. SECTION 11. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby authorizes and directs the City Attorney’s Office to take all steps necessary to commence and prosecute legal proceedings in a court of competent jurisdiction to acquire an approximate 8,073 square foot temporary construction easement for a period of 18 months for the Project. The Subject Property Interest is described more particularly on Exhibit “A” and depicted on Exhibit “B” hereto. Page 312 Resolution No. 2022-010 - Page 5 of 9 SECTION 12. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby authorizes the City Manager to execute all necessary documents in connection with the eminent domain proceeding. SECTION 13. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 19th day of January, 2022. ________________________ L. Dennis Michael, Mayor City of Rancho Cucamonga ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk City of Rancho Cucamonga APPROVED AS TO FORM: Nicholas R. Ghirelli, City Attorney Richards, Watson & Gershon CERTIFICATION: I, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2022-010, was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on the 19th day of January, 2022, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ___________________________ Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk City of Rancho Cucamonga, California Page 313 EXHIBIT A EXHIBIT A Resolution No. 2022-010 - Page 6 of 9 Page 314 Exhibit A Legal Description Etiwanda Grade Separation Project APN 229-131-16 / SCG/DP Etiwanda, LLC Temporary Construction Easement Page 1 of 1 Pages That portion of Parcel A of Lot Line Adjustment No. LLA 2018-00009, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described in the Certificate of Compliance recorded August 29, 2018 as Document No. 2018-0318431 of Official Records of said County, described as follows: Commencing at the northeast corner of said Parcel A as shown on Record of Survey 19-0109, filed in Book 168, Pages 53 through 63 of Records of Survey, being a point on the west right of way of Etiwanda Avenue, sixty (60) foot half-width, as described in the Grant of Easement recorded February 10, 1971 in Book 7607, Page 364 of Official Records of said County; Thence, along said right of way, South 0Y07'00" West, a distance of 189.78 feet to a point on the line common to said Parcel A and the land described in the Grant Deed recorded October 27, 1977 in Book 9293, Page 615 of Official Records as shown on said Record of Survey, said point being the True Point Of Beginning; Thence 15t, along said common line North 89)16'06" West, a distance of 110.64 feet; Thence 2nd, leaving said common line North 0Y07'00" East, a distance of 72.17 feet; Thence 3rd, North 89Y53'39" East, a distance of 110.64 feet to said west right of way of Etiwanda Avenue; Thence 4th, along said west right of way, South 0Y07'00" West, a distance of 73.78 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Containing 8,073 square feet, more or less. Notes The above legal description is based on the dimensions, information, and land references shown on Record of Survey 19-0109 filed in Book 168, Pages 53 through 63 of Record of Surveys. ( Bearings and distances are referenced to the California Coordinate System, Zone 5 grid, NAD83(2011) CSRS Epoch 2017.50. To obtain ground level distances, multiply grid distances by 1.000060364. This descripti Surveyors Act. Justin P. Height, LS 6167 Job No. 0618-00016 SCG / DP Etiwanda, LLC repared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land 10-04-2021 Date :••••• GUIDA •• ••• • • SURVEYING INC. Exhibit A Legal Description Etiwanda Grade Separation Project APN 229-131-16 / DP Etiwanda Temporary Construction Easement Page 1 of 1 Pages Job No. 0618-00016 DP Etiwanda TCE.docx 10-04-2021 That portion of Parcel A of Lot Line Adjustment No. LLA 2018-00009, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described in the Certificate of Compliance recorded August 29, 2018 as Document No. 2018-0318431 of Official Records of said County, described as follows: Commencing at the northeast corner of said Parcel A as shown on Record of Survey 19-0109, filed in Book 168, Pages 53 through 63 of Records of Survey, being a point on the west right of way of Etiwanda Avenue, sixty (60) foot half-width, as described in the Grant of Easement recorded February 10, 1971 in Book 7607, Page 364 of Official Records of said County; Thence, along said right of way, South 0°07’00” West, a distance of 189.78 feet to a point on the line common to said Parcel A and the land described in the Grant Deed recorded October 27, 1977 in Book 9293, Page 615 of Official Records as shown on said Record of Survey, said point being the True Point Of Beginning; Thence 1st, along said common line North 89°16’06” West, a distance of 110.64 feet; Thence 2nd, leaving said common line North 0°07'00" East, a distance of 72.17 feet; Thence 3rd, North 89°53'39" East, a distance of 110.64 feet to said west right of way of Etiwanda Avenue; Thence 4th, along said west right of way, South 0°07'00" West, a distance of 73.78 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Containing 8,073 square feet, more or less. Notes ·The above legal description is based on the dimensions, information, and land references shown on Record of Survey 19-0109 filed in Book 168, Pages 53 through 63 of Record of Surveys. · Bearings and distances are referenced to the California Coordinate System, Zone 5 grid, NAD83(2011) CSRS Epoch 2017.50. To obtain ground level distances, multiply grid distances by 1.000060364. This description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land Surveyors Act. __________________________________________ Justin P. Height, PLS 6167 Date Job No. 0618-00016 SCG / DP Etiwanda, LLC APN 229-131-16 / SCG/DP Etiwanda, LLC Resolution No. 2022-010 - Page 7 of 9 Page 315 EXHIBIT B EXHIBIT B Resolution No. 2022-010 - Page 8 of 9 Page 316 NOTES PLAT MAP IS BASED ON THE INFORMATION AND LAND REFERENCES SHOWN ON RECORD OF SURVEY 19-0109 FILED IN BOOK 168, PAGES 53 THROUGH 63 OF RECORD OF SURVEYS. BEARINGS AND DISTANCES ARE REFERENCED TO THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM, ZONE 5 GRID, NAD83(2011) CSRS EPOCH 2017.50. TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES, MULTIPLY GRID DISTANCES BY 1.000060364. POINT OF COMMENCEMENT NW CORNER OF PARCEL A WEST ROW LI IWANDA AVE PER 7607 OR 364 TEMP. CONST. EASEMENT 8,073 SQ. FT. Pilf .DEL A LLA 2019— 0 0 0 0 9 000 NO 2019-0319431 Jr'' COURSE TABLE L1 SO°07'00''W 189.78' [TIE] L2 N89°16'06”W 110.64' L3 NO°07'00”E 72.17' L4 N89°53'39”E 110.64' L5 SO°07'00''W 73.78' MENU MENU MENU MENEEN MENEEN MENNEN SURVEYING INC. L2 TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING 9293 0 ., R ., 615 BCC NC 2009-001 1 123 SBCTA RAIL CORRIDOR THIS PLAT HAS BEEN PREPARED BY ME, OR UNDER MY 3T ECTION, IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE F \ SI NAL LAND SURVEYORS ACT. 1 0 — 0 4 — 2 0 21 Job No. 0618-00016 JUSTIN P. HEIG T, PLS 6167 DATE SCALE: 1"=100' 50' 60' Exhibit B Plat Map Etiwanda Grade Separation Project APN 229-131-16 / SCG/DP Etiwanda, LLC Temporary Construction Easement Page 1 of 1 Pages ETIWANDA AVENUE APN 229-131-16 / SCG/DP Etiwanda, LLCResolution No. 2022-010 - Page 9 of 9 &nbsp;&nbsp;Page 317 Resolution No. 2022-011 - Page 1 of 10 RESOLUTION NO. 2022-011 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY INTERESTS NECESSARY FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES AND AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION THEREOF IN CONNECTION WITH THE ETIWANDA GRADE SEPARATION PROJECT (TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT OVER A PORTION OF APN 0229-162-15) WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga (“City”) is a municipal corporation in the County of San Bernardino, State of California; and WHEREAS, the City seeks to construct the Etiwanda Grade Separation Project (“Project”). The Project requires the acquisition of additional right of way for grade separation. The Project involves the widening and construction of Etiwanda Avenue as a four-lane grade separated roadway over the Southern California Regional Rail Authority (“SCRRA”)/Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railroad (“BNSF”) San Gabriel subdivision, currently a two-lane at-grade crossing. The Project will construct an overhead crossing, utilizing walls and embankments to support the raised approaching roadway. It will span the railroad right-of-way and provide access to adjacent properties. The Project will widen Etiwanda Avenue to four traffic lanes including a painted median/left turn lane with bike lanes and sidewalks on each side and a northbound right turn lane onto Whittram Avenue. When completed in 2024, the Project will reduce vehicle and truck delays, as well as queuing. It will improve mobility, safety, and level of service at the crossing, and it will provide for the safe transit of pedestrians, bicyclists, vehicles, trucks, and trains. Furthermore, the Project will provide for improved response times in the area for first responders such as police officers, firefighters, paramedics, and emergency medical technicians. All work is consistent with the City’s General Plan of Circulation. The Plans for the Project are on file with the Engineering Services Department and are incorporated herein by this reference; and WHEREAS, the environmental effects of the Project were studied and analyzed pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq., and the CEQA Guidelines, 14 Cal. Code Regs. Section 15000 et seq. (“CEQA Guidelines”). City Staff determined that the Project was statutorily exempt pursuant to CEQA Article 18. Statutory Exemptions, Section 15282. Other Statutory Exemptions, paragraph (g) as a railroad grade separation project which eliminates and existing grade crossing or reconstructs an existing grade separation. The City Council approved the Notice of Exemption and authorized Staff to file the Notice of Exemption with the Office of Planning and Research and the County clerk as specified in Section 21080.13(2) of the Public Resources Code. Said Notice of Exemption was filed with the Office of Planning and Research and with the County of San Bernardino on or about June 11, 2018 in accordance with the statutory requirements; and WHEREAS, in connection with the proposed Resolution of Necessity, on January 19, 2022, City Staff reviewed the environmental documentation prepared in connection with the Project. Pursuant to the criteria of Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines and Section 21166 of the Public Resources Code, City Staff concluded that no substantial changes have occurred in the Project, no substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the Project is undertaken, and that the City has obtained no new information of substantial importance that would require further environmental analysis. These environmental findings are the appropriate findings with respect to the proposed acquisition of the Subject Property Interests. ATTACHMENT 4Page318 Resolution No. 2022-011 - Page 2 of 10 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1. The Rancho Cucamonga City Council adopts Resolution No. 2022-011, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, Declaring Certain Real Property Interests Necessary for Public Purposes and Authorizing the Acquisition Thereof in Connection with the Etiwanda Grade Separation Project (A temporary construction easement on a portion of APN 0229-162-15). SECTION 2. The City seeks to acquire by eminent domain the real property interest described below in Section 3 of this Resolution for public use, namely grade separation and related purposes, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto in connection with the Etiwanda Grade Separation Project pursuant to the authority conferred on the City of Rancho Cucamonga to acquire real property by eminent domain by Section 19 of Article 1 of the California Constitution, Government Code Sections 37350, 37350.5, 37351, 40401, and 40404, California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1230.010 et seq. (Eminent Domain Law), including but not limited to Sections 1240.010, 1240.020, 1240.110, 1240.120, 1240.150, 1240.510, 1240.610, 1240.650, and by other provisions of law. SECTION 3. The City seeks to acquire an approximate 5,011 square foot temporary construction easement with a term of 18 months (“Subject Property Interest”) over a portion of the real property located at 8821 Etiwanda Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, and identified as San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Number 0229-162-15 (“Jones, Garness, & Clemons Parcel”) in connection with the Project. The Subject Property Interest is described more particularly in Exhibit “A” and depicted on Exhibit “B”, which are attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. SECTION 4. The environmental effects of the acquisition of the Subject Property Interest were studied as an integral part of the environmental review for the Project. In connection with the proposed Resolution of Necessity, on January 19, 2022, City Staff reviewed the environmental documentation prepared in connection with the Project. Pursuant to the criteria of Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines and Section 21166 of the Public Resources Code, City staff concluded that no substantial changes have occurred in the Project, no substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the Project is undertaken, and that the City has obtained no new information of substantial importance that would require further environmental analysis. These environmental findings are the appropriate findings with respect to the proposed acquisition of the Subject Property Interest. SECTION 5. The Project, as planned and designed, is in the public interest and necessity and is needed to improve vehicle and rail safety, traffic mobility, and surface transportation, as more fully explained below: A. The Project requires the acquisition of additional right of way for grade separation. The Project involves the widening and construction of Etiwanda Avenue as a four- lane grade separated roadway over the SCRRA/BNSF San Gabriel subdivision, currently a two- lane at-grade crossing. The Project will construct an overhead crossing, utilizing walls and embankments to support the raised approaching roadway. It will span the railroad right-of-way and provide access to adjacent properties. The Project will widen Etiwanda Avenue to four traffic lanes including a painted median/left turn lane with bike lanes and sidewalks on each side and a northbound right turn lane onto Whittram Avenue. When completed in 2024, the Project will reduce vehicle and truck delays, as well as queuing. It will improve mobility, safety, and level of Page 319 Resolution No. 2022-011 - Page 3 of 10 service at the crossing, and it will provide for the safe transit of pedestrians, bicyclists, vehicles, trucks, and trains. Furthermore, the Project will provide for improved response times in the area for first responders such as police officers, firefighters, paramedics, and emergency medical technicians. All work is consistent with the City’s General Plan of Circulation. B. The Project will reduce vehicle and truck delays, improve safety and level of service at the crossing, and it will provide for the safe transit of pedestrians, bicyclists, vehicles, trucks, and trains. Additionally, the Project will provide for improved response times in the area for first responders such as police officers, firefighters, paramedics, and emergency medical technicians. Accordingly, the Project will benefit the residents and businesses of the City and the community as a whole. C. The Project, as planned and designed, is consistent with the Circulation Element of the General Plan, which designated Etiwanda Avenue as a four-lane major arterial road. Anticipating the future growth of the SCRRA/BNSF corridor, the City’s General Plan identified this area to be grade separated. The City seeks to acquire the Subject Property Interest for public use, namely grade separation and related purposes, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto in connection with the Project. The City seeks to construct the Project to improve mobility, safety, and level of service at the crossing. D. The Project was planned and located to minimize the impact on the adjacent properties. Because of its scope, the Project requires the acquisition of several permanent easements and temporary construction easements over portions of 10 larger parcels, as well as fee interests in two parcels owned by private property owners. The construction of the Project will require some business/residential relocations. The City will coordinate the construction with the owner of the Subject Property Interest to minimize the impact of the Project on the parcel. Based on the timing of the Project, it is necessary that the City consider the acquisition by eminent domain of the required Subject Property Interest. SECTION 6. A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 7260 et seq., the City of Rancho Cucamonga obtained a fair market value appraisal of the Jones, Garness & Clemons Parcel, the approximate 5,011 square foot temporary construction easement the City seeks to acquire for a period of 18 months for public use, namely grade separation and related purposes, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto. B. The City set just compensation in accordance with the appraised fair market value, and extended a written offer on October 26, 2021 to the trustees of the Jones Family Trust, the Garness Family Trust, and the Clemons Revocable Trust, the owners of record. The fair market value appraisal used a date of value of October 14, 2021. C. The City’s written offer included an informational pamphlet describing the eminent domain process and the record owner’s rights under the Eminent Domain Law. In accordance with Government Code Section 7267.2, the City’s written offer contained a written statement of, and summary of the basis for, the amount it established as just compensation. The offer set forth the date of value utilized by the appraiser and explained the appraiser’s opinion of the highest and best use of the larger parcel. It explained the applicable zoning designation of the larger parcel. The City’s offer also summarized the principal transactions relied on by the appraiser to arrive at the appraiser’s opinion of value. In addition, the written offer explained the appraiser’s valuation analysis, including severance damages. It included the City’s comparable Page 320 Resolution No. 2022-011 - Page 4 of 10 market data relied on by the appraiser. Further, the City offered, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1263.025, to pay the record owners the reasonable costs, up to $5,000.00, for an independent appraisal of the approximate 5,011 square foot temporary construction easement area. SECTION 7. The City provided written notice to the owners of record, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1245.235 of the City Council’s intent to consider the adoption of a Resolution of Necessity for the acquisition of the Subject Property Interest by eminent domain. SECTION 8. The public use for which the City seeks to acquire the Subject Property Interest, namely grade separation and related purposes, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto, will not unreasonably interfere with or impair the continuance of the public use to which any easement holders may have appropriated the area (Code of Civil Procedure Section 1240.510). Further, the Project may require the relocation of several utilities to the new right-of- way area. The public use for which the City seeks to acquire the Subject Property Interest, namely grade separation and related purposes, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto, is a more necessary public use within the meaning of Code of Civil Procedure Section 1240.650 than the uses to which public utility easement holders have appropriated any utility easements located on or within the area of the Subject Property Interest that are affected by the Project. Accordingly, the City is authorized to acquire the Subject Property Interest pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Sections 1240.510, 1240.610, and 1240.650. SECTION 9. Based on the evidence presented at the hearing regarding the Project, including the Agenda Report and documents referenced therein and any oral and written testimony at the hearing, the City Council hereby finds and determines that: A. The public interest and necessity require the Project; B. The Project is planned and located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury; C. The Subject Property Interest described more particularly in Exhibit “A” and depicted on Exhibit “B” hereto, is necessary for the Project; and D. The City has made the offer required by Government Code Section 7267.2 to the record owner of the Subject Property Interest the City seeks to acquire. SECTION 10. The findings and declarations contained in this Resolution are based upon the record before the City Council, including the Agenda Report and all documents referenced therein, all of which are incorporated herein by this reference, and any testimony and/or comments submitted to the City by the record owner and or the owner’s representative(s). These documents include, but are not limited to the City of Rancho Cucamonga’s General Plan, the offer letter sent to the owner pursuant to Government Code Section 7267.2, the notice to the record owner pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1245.235 of the City’s intent to consider the adoption of the Resolution of Necessity, Grade Separation Plans for the Project, and the Notice of Exemption for the Project. SECTION 11. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby authorizes and directs the City Attorney’s Office to take all steps necessary to commence and prosecute legal proceedings in a court of competent jurisdiction to acquire an approximate 5,011 square foot Page 321 Resolution No. 2022-011 - Page 5 of 10 temporary construction easement for a period of 18 months for the Project. The Subject Property Interest is described more particularly on Exhibit “A” and depicted on Exhibit “B” hereto. SECTION 12. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby authorizes the City Manager to execute all necessary documents in connection with the eminent domain proceeding. SECTION 13. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 19th day of January, 2022. ________________________ L. Dennis Michael, Mayor City of Rancho Cucamonga ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk City of Rancho Cucamonga APPROVED AS TO FORM: Nicholas R. Ghirelli, City Attorney Richards, Watson & Gershon CERTIFICATION: I, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2022-011, was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on the 19th day of January, 2022, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ___________________________ Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk City of Rancho Cucamonga, California Page 322 EXHIBIT A EXHIBIT A Resolution No. 2022-011 - Page 6 of 10 Page 323 Exhibit A Legal Description Etiwanda Grade Separation Project APN 229-162-15 / Jones-Strack Temporary Construction Easement Page 1 of 1 Pages That portion of Parcel B, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, as described in the Certificate of Compliance No. 269 for Lot Line Adjustment, recorded February 18, 1988 as Document No. 88-048704 of Official Records, records of said County, described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the north line of said Parcel B with the east line of Etiwanda Avenue, fifty (50) foot half-width, as described in the Easement Deed recorded February 16, 1988 as Document No. 88-046978 of Official Records of said County, as both are shown on Sheet 5 of Record of Survey 19-0109 filed in Book 168, Pages 53 through 63 of Record of Surveys, records of said County; Thence 15t, along the north line of said Parcel B, S 89)36'54" E, a distance of 402.05 feet; Thence 2nd, leaving said north line, S 00)23'06" W, a distance of 10.00 feet to a line parallel with, and lying 10.00 feet south of, said north line of Parcel B; Thence 3rd, along said parallel line, N 89Y36'54" W, distance of 392.00 feet to a line parallel with, and lying 10.00 feet east of, said east line of Etiwanda Avenue; Thence 4th, along last said parallel line, S 00Y07'00" W, distance of 99.06 feet; Thence 5th, leaving last said parallel line, N 89)33'00" W, a distance of 10.00 feet to said east line of Etiwanda Avenue; Thence 6th, along said east line, N 00Y07'00" E, a distance of 109.11 feet to the Point of Beginning. Containing 5,011 square feet, more or less. Notes The above legal description is based on the dimensions, information, and land references shown on Record of Survey 19-0109 filed in Book 168, Pages 53 through 63 of Record of Surveys. ( Bearings and distances are referenced to the California Coordinate System, Zone 5 grid, NAD83(2011) CSRS Epoch 2017.50. To obtain ground level distances, multiply grid distances by 1.000060364. This descripti n repared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land Surveyors Act. 10-04-2021 Justin P. Height, LS 6167 Date Job No. 0618-00016 Jones-Strack TCE.docx :••••• GUIDA • • ••• • • SURVEYING INC. Exhibit A Legal Description Etiwanda Grade Separation Project APN 229-162-15 / Jones-Strack Temporary Construction Easement Page 1 of 1 Pages Job No. 0618-00016 Jones-Strack TCE.docx 10-04-2021 That portion of Parcel B, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, as described in the Certificate of Compliance No. 269 for Lot Line Adjustment, recorded February 18, 1988 as Document No. 88-048704 of Official Records, records of said County, described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the north line of said Parcel B with the east line of Etiwanda Avenue, fifty (50) foot half-width, as described in the Easement Deed recorded February 16, 1988 as Document No. 88-046978 of Official Records of said County, as both are shown on Sheet 5 of Record of Survey 19-0109 filed in Book 168, Pages 53 through 63 of Record of Surveys, records of said County; Thence 1st, along the north line of said Parcel B, S 89°36’54” E, a distance of 402.05 feet; Thence 2nd, leaving said north line, S 00°23’06” W, a distance of 10.00 feet to a line parallel with, and lying 10.00 feet south of, said north line of Parcel B; Thence 3rd, along said parallel line, N 89°36’54” W, distance of 392.00 feet to a line parallel with, and lying 10.00 feet east of, said east line of Etiwanda Avenue; Thence 4th, along last said parallel line, S 00°07’00” W, distance of 99.06 feet; Thence 5th, leaving last said parallel line, N 89°53’00” W, a distance of 10.00 feet to said east line of Etiwanda Avenue; Thence 6th, along said east line, N 00°07’00” E, a distance of 109.11 feet to the Point of Beginning. Containing 5,011 square feet, more or less. Notes ·The above legal description is based on the dimensions, information, and land references shown on Record of Survey 19-0109 filed in Book 168, Pages 53 through 63 of Record of Surveys. · Bearings and distances are referenced to the California Coordinate System, Zone 5 grid, NAD83(2011) CSRS Epoch 2017.50. To obtain ground level distances, multiply grid distances by 1.000060364. This description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land Surveyors Act. __________________________________________ Justin P. Height, PLS 6167 Date Resolution No. 2022-011 - Page 7 of 10 Page 324 EXHIBIT B EXHIBIT B Resolution No. 2022-011 - Page 8 of 10 Page 325 w ::> z w > <( <( Cl z <( �- ; j : WHITTRAM _AVENUE I / ----� 50' P J-\R C.EL J-\ DOC NOJ 2b9 FOR LLJ-\ DOCJ NOJ 88�048704 OR POB NORTH LINE OF PARCEL B COC NO. 269 FOR LLA DOC. NO. 88-048704 OR TEMP. CONST. EASEMENT5,011 SQ. FT. 1-w (SEE PAGE 2) PJ-\RC.EL 8 NOTES PLAT MAP IS BASED ON THE INFORMATION AND LAND REFERENCES SHOWN ON RECORD OF SURVEY 19-0109 FILED IN BOOK 168, PAGES53 THROUGH 63 OF RECORD OF SURVEYS. BEARINGS AND DISTANCES ARE REFERENCED TO THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM, ZONE 5 GRID, NAD83(2011) CSRS EPOCH 2017.50. TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES, MULTIPLY GRID DISTANCES BY 1 .000060364. DOC NOJ 2b9 FOR LLJ-\ DOCJ NOJ 88�048704 OR SCALE: 1 "= 100' cjr1 I..________ EAST LINE OF ETIWANDA AVE 50' �PER EASEMENT DEED DOC. NO. 88-046978 OR SBCTA RAIL CORRIDOR � GUIDA THIS PLAT HAS BEEN PREPARED BY ME, OR UNDER MY Dl�!ION, IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE P�°{��\1�f LAND SURVEYORS ACT. _____ SURVEYING INC. 10-04-2021 Job No. 0618-00016 Jones-Strack TCE.dwg �PLS 6167 DATE Exhibit B Plat Map Etiwanda Grade Separation Project APN 229-162-15 / Jones-Strack Temporary Construction Easement Page 1 of 2 Pages Resolution No. 2022-011 - Page 6 of 10 Resolution No. 2022-011 - Page 6 of 10 Resolution No. 2022-011 - Page 9 of 10 &nbsp;&nbsp;Page 326 POB w => z w <( <( Cl � z <( 0 3,: I-w w 0 0 z ----l �10.00' ----- \_ N89"53"00"W 10.00' GUIDA SURVEYING INC. EAST LINE OF ETIWANDA AVE PER EASEMENT DEED DOC. NO. 88-046978 OR 10.00' PARC.EL 8 CDC N0a 2b9 FOR LLA D0Ca N0a 88�048704 OR Job No. 0618-00016 Jones-Strack TCE.dwg SCALE: 1 "=50' NORTH LINE OF PARCEL B COC NO. 269 FOR LLA DOC. NO. 88-048704 OR TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT 5,011 SQ. FT. soo·23•05•• w) 10.00' Exhibit B Plat Map Etiwanda Grade Separation Project APN 229-162-15 / Jones-Strack Temporary Construction Easement Page 2 of 2 Pages Resolution No. 2022-011 - Page 10 of 10 &nbsp;&nbsp;Page 327 Resolution No. 2022-012 - Page 1 of 12 RESOLUTION NO. 2022-012 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY INTERESTS NECESSARY FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES AND AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION THEREOF IN CONNECTION WITH THE ETIWANDA GRADE SEPARATION PROJECT (TWO TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENTS OVER A PORTION OF APNS 0229-131-30 & 31) WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga (“City”) is a municipal corporation in the County of San Bernardino, State of California; and WHEREAS, the City seeks to construct the Etiwanda Grade Separation Project (“Project”). The Project requires the acquisition of additional right of way for grade separation. The Project involves the widening and construction of Etiwanda Avenue as a four-lane grade separated roadway over the Southern California Regional Rail Authority (“SCRRA”)/Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railroad (“BNSF”) San Gabriel subdivision, currently a two-lane at-grade crossing. The Project will construct an overhead crossing, utilizing walls and embankments to support the raised approaching roadway. It will span the railroad right-of-way and provide access to adjacent properties. The Project will widen Etiwanda Avenue to four traffic lanes including a painted median/left turn lane with bike lanes and sidewalks on each side and a northbound right turn lane onto Whittram Avenue. When completed in 2024, the Project will reduce vehicle and truck delays, as well as queuing. It will improve mobility, safety, and level of service at the crossing, and it will provide for the safe transit of pedestrians, bicyclists, vehicles, trucks, and trains. Furthermore, the Project will provide for improved response times in the area for first responders such as police officers, firefighters, paramedics, and emergency medical technicians. All work is consistent with the City’s General Plan of Circulation. The Plans for the Project are on file with the Engineering Services Department and are incorporated herein by this reference; and WHEREAS, the environmental effects of the Project were studied and analyzed pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq., and the CEQA Guidelines, 14 Cal. Code Regs. Section 15000 et seq. (“CEQA Guidelines”). City Staff determined that the Project was statutorily exempt pursuant to CEQA Article 18. Statutory Exemptions, Section 15282. Other Statutory Exemptions, paragraph (g) as a railroad grade separation project which eliminates and existing grade crossing or reconstructs an existing grade separation. The City Council approved the Notice of Exemption and authorized Staff to file the Notice of Exemption with the Office of Planning and Research and the County clerk as specified in Section 21080.13(2) of the Public Resources Code. Said Notice of Exemption was filed with the Office of Planning and Research and with the County of San Bernardino on or about June 11, 2018 in accordance with the statutory requirements; and WHEREAS, in connection with the proposed Resolution of Necessity, on January 19, 2022, City Staff reviewed the environmental documentation prepared in connection with the Project. Pursuant to the criteria of Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines and Section 21166 of the Public Resources Code, City Staff concluded that no substantial changes have occurred in the Project, no substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the Project is undertaken, and that the City has obtained no new information of substantial importance that would require further environmental analysis. These environmental findings are the appropriate findings with respect to the proposed acquisition of the Subject Property Interests. ATTACHMENT 5Page328 Resolution No. 2022-012 - Page 2 of 12 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1. The Rancho Cucamonga City Council adopts Resolution No. 2022-012, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, Declaring Certain Real Property Interests Necessary for Public Purposes and Authorizing the Acquisition Thereof in Connection with the Etiwanda Grade Separation Project (Two temporary construction easements on portions of APNs 0229-131-30 & 31). SECTION 2. The City seeks to acquire by eminent domain the real property interest described below in Section 3 of this Resolution for public use, namely grade separation and related purposes, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto in connection with the Etiwanda Grade Separation Project pursuant to the authority conferred on the City of Rancho Cucamonga to acquire real property by eminent domain by Section 19 of Article 1 of the California Constitution, Government Code Sections 37350, 37350.5, 37351, 40401, and 40404, California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1230.010 et seq. (Eminent Domain Law), including but not limited to Sections 1240.010, 1240.020, 1240.110, 1240.120, 1240.150, 1240.510, 1240.610, 1240.650, and by other provisions of law. SECTION 3. The City seeks to acquire two temporary construction easements, each with a term of 30 months, consisting of approximately 1,254 square feet and approximately 4,024 square feet over portions of the real property located at 12521 Arrow Route and 8688 Etiwanda Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and further identified as San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 0229-131-30 and 0229-131-31 in connection with the Project. The two easements are collectively referred to herein as “Subject Property Interest,” and APNs 0229- 131-30 & 31 are collectively referred to herein as “Goodman Rancho Parcel.” The Subject Property Interest is described more particularly in Exhibit “A” and depicted on Exhibit “B”, which are attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. SECTION 4. The environmental effects of the acquisition of the Subject Property Interest were studied as an integral part of the environmental review for the Project. In connection with the proposed Resolution of Necessity, on January 19, 2022, City Staff reviewed the environmental documentation prepared in connection with the Project. Pursuant to the criteria of Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines and Section 21166 of the Public Resources Code, City staff concluded that no substantial changes have occurred in the Project, no substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the Project is undertaken, and that the City has obtained no new information of substantial importance that would require further environmental analysis. These environmental findings are the appropriate findings with respect to the proposed acquisition of the Subject Property Interest. SECTION 5. The Project, as planned and designed, is in the public interest and necessity and is needed to improve vehicle and rail safety, traffic mobility, and surface transportation, as more fully explained below: A. The Project requires the acquisition of additional right of way for grade separation. The Project involves the widening and construction of Etiwanda Avenue as a four- lane grade separated roadway over the SCRRA/BNSF San Gabriel subdivision, currently a two- lane at-grade crossing. The Project will construct an overhead crossing, utilizing walls and embankments to support the raised approaching roadway. It will span the railroad right-of-way and provide access to adjacent properties. The Project will widen Etiwanda Avenue to four traffic lanes including a painted median/left turn lane with bike lanes and sidewalks on each side and a Page 329 Resolution No. 2022-012 - Page 3 of 12 northbound right turn lane onto Whittram Avenue. When completed in 2024, the Project will reduce vehicle and truck delays, as well as queuing. It will improve mobility, safety, and level of service at the crossing, and it will provide for the safe transit of pedestrians, bicyclists, vehicles, trucks, and trains. Furthermore, the Project will provide for improved response times in the area for first responders such as police officers, firefighters, paramedics, and emergency medical technicians. All work is consistent with the City’s General Plan of Circulation. B. The Project will reduce vehicle and truck delays, improve safety and level of service at the crossing, and it will provide for the safe transit of pedestrians, bicyclists, vehicles, trucks, and trains. Additionally, the Project will provide for improved response times in the area for first responders such as police officers, firefighters, paramedics, and emergency medical technicians. Accordingly, the Project will benefit the residents and businesses of the City and the community as a whole. C. The Project, as planned and designed, is consistent with the Circulation Element of the General Plan, which designated Etiwanda Avenue as a four-lane major arterial road. Anticipating the future growth of the SCRRA/BNSF corridor, the City’s General Plan identified this area to be grade separated. The City seeks to acquire the Subject Property Interest for public use, namely grade separation and related purposes, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto in connection with the Project. The City seeks to construct the Project to improve mobility, safety, and level of service at the crossing. D. The Project was planned and located to minimize the impact on the adjacent properties. Because of its scope, the Project requires the acquisition of several permanent easements and temporary construction easements over portions of 10 larger parcels, as well as fee interests in two parcels owned by private property owners. The construction of the Project will require some business/residential relocations. The City will coordinate the construction with the owner of the Subject Property Interest to minimize the impact of the Project on the parcel. Based on the timing of the Project, it is necessary that the City consider the acquisition by eminent domain of the required Subject Property Interest. SECTION 6. A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 7260 et seq., the City of Rancho Cucamonga obtained a fair market value appraisal of the Goodman Rancho Parcel, the approximate 1,254 square foot and 4,024 square foot temporary construction easements the City seeks to acquire for a period of 30 months for public use, namely grade separation and related purposes, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto. B. The City set just compensation in accordance with the appraised fair market value, and extended a written offer on October 26, 2021 to Goodman Rancho SPE LLC, the owner of record. The fair market value appraisal used a date of value of October 14, 2021. C. The City’s written offer included an informational pamphlet describing the eminent domain process and the record owner’s rights under the Eminent Domain Law. In accordance with Government Code Section 7267.2, the City’s written offer contained a written statement of, and summary of the basis for, the amount it established as just compensation. The offer set forth the date of value utilized by the appraiser and explained the appraiser’s opinion of the highest and best use of the larger parcel. It explained the applicable zoning designation of the larger parcel. The City’s offer also summarized the principal transactions relied on by the appraiser to arrive at the appraiser’s opinion of value. In addition, the written offer explained the Page 330 Resolution No. 2022-012 - Page 4 of 12 appraiser’s valuation analysis, including severance damages. It included the City’s comparable market data relied on by the appraiser. Further, the City offered, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1263.025, to pay the record owner the reasonable costs, up to $5,000.00, for an independent appraisal of the approximate 1,254 square foot and 4,024 square foot temporary construction easement areas. SECTION 7. The City provided written notice to the owner of record, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1245.235 of the City Council’s intent to consider the adoption of a Resolution of Necessity for the acquisition of the Subject Property Interest by eminent domain. SECTION 8. The public use for which the City seeks to acquire the Subject Property Interest, namely grade separation and related purposes, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto, will not unreasonably interfere with or impair the continuance of the public use to which any easement holders may have appropriated the area (Code of Civil Procedure Section 1240.510). Further, the Project may require the relocation of several utilities to the new right-of- way area. The public use for which the City seeks to acquire the Subject Property Interest, namely grade separation and related purposes, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto, is a more necessary public use within the meaning of Code of Civil Procedure Section 1240.650 than the uses to which public utility easement holders have appropriated any utility easements located on or within the area of the Subject Property Interest that are affected by the Project. Accordingly, the City is authorized to acquire the Subject Property Interest pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Sections 1240.510, 1240.610, and 1240.650. SECTION 9. Based on the evidence presented at the hearing regarding the Project, including the Agenda Report and documents referenced therein and any oral and written testimony at the hearing, the City Council hereby finds and determines that: A. The public interest and necessity require the Project; B. The Project is planned and located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury; C. The Subject Property Interest described more particularly in Exhibit “A” and depicted on Exhibit “B” hereto, is necessary for the Project; and D. The City has made the offer required by Government Code Section 7267.2 to the record owner of the Subject Property Interest the City seeks to acquire. SECTION 10. The findings and declarations contained in this Resolution are based upon the record before the City Council, including the Agenda Report and all documents referenced therein, all of which are incorporated herein by this reference, and any testimony and/or comments submitted to the City by the record owner and or the owner’s representative(s). These documents include, but are not limited to the City of Rancho Cucamonga’s General Plan, the offer letter sent to the owner pursuant to Government Code Section 7267.2, the notice to the record owner pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1245.235 of the City’s intent to consider the adoption of the Resolution of Necessity, Grade Separation Plans for the Project, and the Notice of Exemption for the Project. SECTION 11. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby authorizes and directs the City Attorney’s Office to take all steps necessary to commence and prosecute legal proceedings in a court of competent jurisdiction to acquire the approximate 1,254 square foot and Page 331 Resolution No. 2022-012 - Page 5 of 12 4,024 temporary construction easements for a period of 30 months for the Project. The Subject Property Interest is described more particularly on Exhibit “A” and depicted on Exhibit “B” hereto. SECTION 12. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby authorizes the City Manager to execute all necessary documents in connection with the eminent domain proceeding. SECTION 13. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 19th day of January, 2022. ________________________ L. Dennis Michael, Mayor City of Rancho Cucamonga ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk City of Rancho Cucamonga APPROVED AS TO FORM: Nicholas R. Ghirelli, City Attorney Richards, Watson & Gershon CERTIFICATION: I, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2022-012, was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on the 19th day of January, 2022, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ___________________________ Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk City of Rancho Cucamonga, California Page 332 EXHIBIT A EXHIBIT A Resolution No. 2022-012 - Page 6 of 12 Page 333 Exhibit A Legal Description Etiwanda Grade Separation Project APN 229-131-31 / Goodman Temporary Construction Easements Page 1 of 2 Pages Those portions of Parcel 2 of Parcel Map No. 19448, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, as shown on the map filed in Book 242, Pages 56 through 60 of Parcel Maps, records of said County, described as follows: TCE1 Commencing at the southeast corner of the temporary construction easement described in the grant of temporary construction easement recorded May 18, 2015 as Document No. 2015-0203908 of Official Records of said County, being a point on the west right of way of Etiwanda Avenue, fifty (50) foot half-width, as described in the Grant of Easement recorded April 3, 1995 as Document No. 95-101283 of Official Records of said County; Thence, along the south line of said temporary construction easement, being also the south line of said Parcel 2, South 89Y53'57" West, a distance of 141.60 feet to the southwest corner of said temporary construction easement; Thence, along the west line of said temporary construction easement, North 00107'00" East, a distance of 43.60 feet to the True Point of Beginning, being the beginning of a non-tangent curve to the right, concave northerly, the radial center of which bears North 16107'54" West, a distance of 475.00 feet; Thence 15t, leaving said west line, westerly along said curve, through a central angle of 01)37'48", an arc distance of 16.28 feet; Thence 2nd, North 13115'08" West, distance of 53.26 feet to the beginning of a non-tangent curve to the left, concave northerly, the radial center of which bears North 111219'58" West, a distance of 175.00 feet; Thence 3rd, easterly along said curve, through a central angle of 07107'02", an arc distance of 21.74 feet; Thence 4th, North 00)36'05" West, distance of 8.00 feet; Thence 5th, South 89Y54'08" East, distance of 7.18 feet to the west line of said temporary construction easement; Thence 6th, along said west line, South 00107'00" West, distance of 61.34 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Containing 1,254 square feet, more or less. TCE2 Commencing at the southeast corner of the temporary construction easement described in the grant of temporary construction easement recorded May 18, 2015 as Document No. 2015-0203908 of Official Records of said County, being a point on the west right of way of Etiwanda Avenue, 50 feet wide, as described in the Grant of Easement recorded April 3, 1995 as Document No. 95-101283 of Official Records of said County; Thence, along the south line of said temporary construction easement, being also the south line of said Parcel 2, South 89Y53'57" West, a distance of 141.60 feet to the southwest corner of said temporary construction easement; Job No. 0618-00016 Goodman TCE.docx :••••• GUIDA • • ••• • • ...... SURVEYING INC. Exhibit A Legal Description Etiwanda Grade Separation Project APN 229-131-31 / Goodman Temporary Construction Easements Page 1 of 2 Pages Job No. 0618-00016 Goodman TCE.docx Those portions of Parcel 2 of Parcel Map No. 19448, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, as shown on the map filed in Book 242, Pages 56 through 60 of Parcel Maps, records of said County, described as follows: TCE1 Commencing at the southeast corner of the temporary construction easement described in the grant of temporary construction easement recorded May 18, 2015 as Document No. 2015-0203908 of Official Records of said County, being a point on the west right of way of Etiwanda Avenue, fifty (50) foot half-width, as described in the Grant of Easement recorded April 3, 1995 as Document No. 95-101283 of Official Records of said County; Thence, along the south line of said temporary construction easement, being also the south line of said Parcel 2, South 89°53’57” West, a distance of 141.60 feet to the southwest corner of said temporary construction easement; Thence, along the west line of said temporary construction easement, North 00°07’00” East, a distance of 43.60 feet to the True Point of Beginning, being the beginning of a non-tangent curve to the right, concave northerly, the radial center of which bears North 16°07'54" West, a distance of 475.00 feet; Thence 1st, leaving said west line, westerly along said curve, through a central angle of 01°57’48”, an arc distance of 16.28 feet; Thence 2nd, North 13°15'08" West, distance of 53.26 feet to the beginning of a non-tangent curve to the left, concave northerly, the radial center of which bears North 11°49'58" West, a distance of 175.00 feet; Thence 3rd, easterly along said curve, through a central angle of 07°07’02”, an arc distance of 21.74 feet; Thence 4th, North 00°36'05" West, distance of 8.00 feet; Thence 5th, South 89°54'08" East, distance of 7.18 feet to the west line of said temporary construction easement; Thence 6th, along said west line, South 00°07'00" West, distance of 61.34 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Containing 1,254 square feet, more or less. TCE2 Commencing at the southeast corner of the temporary construction easement described in the grant of temporary construction easement recorded May 18, 2015 as Document No. 2015-0203908 of Official Records of said County, being a point on the west right of way of Etiwanda Avenue, 50 feet wide, as described in the Grant of Easement recorded April 3, 1995 as Document No. 95-101283 of Official Records of said County; Thence, along the south line of said temporary construction easement, being also the south line of said Parcel 2, South 89°53’57” West, a distance of 141.60 feet to the southwest corner of said temporary construction easement; Resolution No. 2022-012 - Page 7 of 12 Page 334 Exhibit A Legal Description Etiwanda Grade Separation Project APN 229-131-31 / Goodman Temporary Construction Easements Page 2 of 2 Pages Thence, along the west line of said temporary construction easement, North 00107'00" East, a distance of 170.90 feet to the northwest corner of said temporary construction easement, being the True Point of Beginning; Thence 15t, along the northerly prolongation of last said west line, North 00107'00" East, a distance of 2.14 feet; Thence 2nd, North 89133'57" East, distance of 74.61 feet; Thence 3rd, North 50150'20" East, distance of 55.55 feet; Thence 4th, North 12108'58" East, distance of 76.75 feet; Thence 5th, North 01137'46" East, distance of 186.11 feet; Thence 6th, North 89134'37" East, distance of 2.00 feet to said west right of way of Etiwanda Avenue; Thence 7th, along said west right of way, South 00107'00" West, distance of 298.14 feet to the northeast corner of said temporary construction easement; Thence 8th, along the north line of said temporary construction easement, South 89153'57" West, a distance of 141.60 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Containing 4,024 square feet, more or less. Notes The above legal description is based on the dimensions, information, and land references shown on Record of Survey 19-0109 filed in Book 168, Pages 53 through 63 of Record of Surveys. ( Bearings and distances are referenced to the California Coordinate System, Zone 5 grid, NAD83(2011) CSRS Epoch 2017.50. To obtain ground level distances, multiply grid distances by 1.000060364. This description been. repared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land \\ Surveyors Act. 10-04-2021 Justin P. Height, LS 6167 Date Job No. 0618-00016 Goodman TCE.docx :••••• GUIDA • • ••• • • SURVEYING INC. Exhibit A Legal Description Etiwanda Grade Separation Project APN 229-131-31 / Goodman Temporary Construction Easements Page 2 of 2 Pages Job No. 0618-00016 Goodman TCE.docx 10-04-2021 Thence, along the west line of said temporary construction easement, North 00°07’00” East, a distance of 170.90 feet to the northwest corner of said temporary construction easement, being the True Point of Beginning; Thence 1st, along the northerly prolongation of last said west line, North 00°07'00" East, a distance of 2.14 feet; Thence 2nd, North 89°53'57" East, distance of 74.61 feet; Thence 3rd, North 50°50'20" East, distance of 55.55 feet; Thence 4th, North 12°08'58" East, distance of 76.75 feet; Thence 5th, North 01°57'46" East, distance of 186.11 feet; Thence 6th, North 89°34'37" East, distance of 2.00 feet to said west right of way of Etiwanda Avenue; Thence 7th, along said west right of way, South 00°07'00" West, distance of 298.14 feet to the northeast corner of said temporary construction easement; Thence 8th, along the north line of said temporary construction easement, South 89°53'57" West, a distance of 141.60 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Containing 4,024 square feet, more or less. Notes ·The above legal description is based on the dimensions, information, and land references shown on Record of Survey 19-0109 filed in Book 168, Pages 53 through 63 of Record of Surveys. · Bearings and distances are referenced to the California Coordinate System, Zone 5 grid, NAD83(2011) CSRS Epoch 2017.50. To obtain ground level distances, multiply grid distances by 1.000060364. This description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land Surveyors Act. __________________________________________ Justin P. Height, PLS 6167 Date Resolution No. 2022-012 - Page 8 of 12 Page 335 EXHIBIT B EXHIBIT B Resolution No. 2022-012 - Page 9 of 12 Page 336 er: 0 u' f'1) 0 ,tom �o� 0 f'1) lf) I _]JO � LL] CT) J ,O O � CO er: 0 � " � f\l o 0::: u., f\l 1 � 0 -10-1 :z:f'1) u' 0f\l 0CT' Cl SOUTH LINE OF PARCEL 2 TCE1 TRUE POINT____,_ <).. OF BEGINNING <'. 0' TCE 1 '\ ,:}' �0 (to r-Oi v ,,.� <::P ./:.J ov ?.:/ \ •),,C) TEMP. CONST. EASEMENT 1,254 SQ. FT. (SEE PAGE 2) _TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING TCE2 TCE2 PARCEL 2 PARCEL MAP NO. 19448 PM8 242/Sb-bO TEMP. CONST. EASEMENT 4,024 SQ. FT. (SEE PAGE 3) ..j::,. 0 0) 0 POINT OF COMMENCEMENT TCE1 & TCE2 (Jl 0 WEST ROW OF ETIWANDA AVE. PER 95-101283 OR (Jl 0 ---------<t:----ETIWANDA AVENUE--N;TES -----------<t:------ SCALE: 1 "=80' GUIDA _____ SURVEYING INC. Job No. 0618-00016 Goodman TCE.dwg TIN P. HEI NO. 6167 PLAT MAP IS BASED ON THE INFORMATION AND LAND REFERENCES SHOWN ON RECORD OF SURVEY 19-0109 FILED IN BOOK 168, PAGES 53 THROUGH 63 OF RECORD OF SURVEYS. BEARINGS AND DISTANCES ARE REFERENCED TO THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM, ZONE 5 GRID, NAD83(2011) CSRS EPOCH 2017.50. TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES, MULTIPLY GRID DISTANCES BY 1.000060364. THIS PLAT HAS BEEN PREPARED BY ME, OR UNDER M,.Y DIRECTION, IN CONFORMANCE WITH T�E,.,_RR.OF'ESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS ACT. 10-04-2021 IGHT, PLS 61 67 DATE Exhibit B Plat Map Etiwanda Grade Separation Project APN 229-131-31 / Goodman Temporary Construction Easements Page 1 of 3 Pages Resolution No. 2022-012 - Page 10 of 12 &nbsp;&nbsp;Page 337 COURSE TABLE L1 S89°53'57"W 141.60' [TIE] L2 N 00°07'00"E 43.60' [TIE] C1 R=475.00 D=01°57'48" L=16.28' L3 N13°15'08"W 53.26' C2 R=175.00' D=07°07'02" L=21.74' L4 N 00°36'05"W 8.00' L5 S89°54'08"E 7.18' L6 S00°07'00"W 61.34' Cl L2F TI El POC i /—TCE1 TPOB TCE1 0 L6 TCE1 TEMP. CONST. EASEMENT 1,254 SQ. FT. '8"1\1-- \,\ A °49'5_— RFD \ iN‘". 02 L4 L5 SCALE: 1"=.20' PAROL'L 2 PAROL'L, MAP NO, J9442 PMA 242/56-60 -FOE', DOO NO 2015-02039'08 0.H WEST ROW OF ETIWANDA AVE._7 - PER 95-101283 OR IMP G U I DA ..... ...... .1 .1 .1 SURVEYING INC. Job No. 0618-00016 Goodman TCE.dwg ETIWANDA AVENUE Exhibit B Plat Map Etiwanda Grade Separation Project APN 229-131-31 / Goodman Temporary Construction Easements Page 2 of 3 Pages Resolution No. 2022-012 - Page 11 of 12 &nbsp;&nbsp;Page 338 ...---_J L2 [TIE] --------1- 0 0 0C\l LLl? 2 lf)I � 0 C\l 0 0 TPOB TCE2 L3 -.;J-_J ■■GUIDA SURVEYING INC. Job No. 0618-00016 Goodman TCE.dwg TCE2 SCALE: 1 "=40' PARCE'.L 2 PARCE'.L MAP NO. 19448 PM8 242/Sb�bo TEMP. CONST. EASEMENT 4,024 SQ. FT. COURSE TABLE L1 S89"53'57"W L2 N00"07'00"E L3 Noo·o7•oo"E L4 N89"53'57"E LS N50"50'20"E L6 N12"08'58"E L7 N01"57'46"E L8 N89"34'37"E L9 soo·o7•oo"w L 10 S89"53'57"W 141.60' [TIE] 170. 90' [TIE] 2.14' 74.61' 55.55' 76.75' 186.11' 2.00' 298.14' 141.60' L8 L9 WEST ROW OF ETIWANDA /AVE. PER 95-101283 OR ETIWANDA AVENUE Exhibit B Plat Map Etiwanda Grade Separation Project APN 229-131-31 / Goodman Temporary Construction Easements Page 3 of 3 Pages Resolution No. 2022-012 - Page 12 of 12 &nbsp;&nbsp;Page 339 Resolution No. 2022-013 - Page 1 of 13 RESOLUTION NO. 2022-013 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY INTERESTS NECESSARY FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES AND AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION THEREOF IN CONNECTION WITH THE ETIWANDA GRADE SEPARATION PROJECT (TWO PERMANENT EASEMENTS AND A TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT OVER A PORTION OF APN 0229- 283-79) WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga (“City”) is a municipal corporation in the County of San Bernardino, State of California; and WHEREAS, the City seeks to construct the Etiwanda Grade Separation Project (“Project”). The Project requires the acquisition of additional right of way for grade separation. The Project involves the widening and construction of Etiwanda Avenue as a four-lane grade separated roadway over the Southern California Regional Rail Authority (“SCRRA”)/Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railroad (“BNSF”) San Gabriel subdivision, currently a two-lane at-grade crossing. The Project will construct an overhead crossing, utilizing walls and embankments to support the raised approaching roadway. It will span the railroad right-of-way and provide access to adjacent properties. The Project will widen Etiwanda Avenue to four traffic lanes including a painted median/left turn lane with bike lanes and sidewalks on each side and a northbound right turn lane onto Whittram Avenue. When completed in 2024, the Project will reduce vehicle and truck delays, as well as queuing. It will improve mobility, safety, and level of service at the crossing, and it will provide for the safe transit of pedestrians, bicyclists, vehicles, trucks, and trains. Furthermore, the Project will provide for improved response times in the area for first responders such as police officers, firefighters, paramedics, and emergency medical technicians. All work is consistent with the City’s General Plan of Circulation. The Plans for the Project are on file with the Engineering Services Department and are incorporated herein by this reference; and WHEREAS, the environmental effects of the Project were studied and analyzed pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq., and the CEQA Guidelines, 14 Cal. Code Regs. Section 15000 et seq. (“CEQA Guidelines”). City Staff determined that the Project was statutorily exempt pursuant to CEQA Article 18. Statutory Exemptions, Section 15282. Other Statutory Exemptions, paragraph (g) as a railroad grade separation project which eliminates and existing grade crossing or reconstructs an existing grade separation. The City Council approved the Notice of Exemption and authorized Staff to file the Notice of Exemption with the Office of Planning and Research and the County clerk as specified in Section 21080.13(2) of the Public Resources Code. Said Notice of Exemption was filed with the Office of Planning and Research and with the County of San Bernardino on or about June 11, 2018 in accordance with the statutory requirements; and WHEREAS, in connection with the proposed Resolution of Necessity, on January 19, 2022, City Staff reviewed the environmental documentation prepared in connection with the Project. Pursuant to the criteria of Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines and Section 21166 of the Public Resources Code, City Staff concluded that no substantial changes have occurred in the Project, no substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the Project is undertaken, and that the City has obtained no new information of substantial importance that would require further environmental analysis. These environmental findings are the appropriate findings with respect to the proposed acquisition of the Subject Property Interests. ATTACHMENT 6Page340 Resolution No. 2022-013 - Page 2 of 13 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1. The Rancho Cucamonga City Council adopts Resolution No. 2022-013, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, Declaring Certain Real Property Interests Necessary for Public Purposes and Authorizing the Acquisition Thereof in Connection with the Etiwanda Grade Separation Project (two permanent easements and a temporary construction easement on portions of APN 0229-283-79). SECTION 2. The City seeks to acquire by eminent domain the real property interest described below in Section 3 of this Resolution for public use, namely grade separation and related purposes, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto in connection with the Etiwanda Grade Separation Project pursuant to the authority conferred on the City of Rancho Cucamonga to acquire real property by eminent domain by Section 19 of Article 1 of the California Constitution, Government Code Sections 37350, 37350.5, 37351, 40401, and 40404, California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1230.010 et seq. (Eminent Domain Law), including but not limited to Sections 1240.010, 1240.020, 1240.110, 1240.120, 1240.150, 1240.510, 1240.610, 1240.650, and by other provisions of law. SECTION 3. The City seeks to acquire an approximate 401 square foot permanent easement, an approximate 14,801 square foot permanent easement, and an approximate 7,936 square foot temporary construction easement with a term of 30 months over portions of the real property located at 8996 Etiwanda Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and further identified as San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Number 0229-283-79 in connection with the Project. The two permanent easements and the temporary construction easement are collectively referred to herein as “Subject Property Interest,” and APN 0229-283-79 is referred to herein as “BTC III Parcel.” The Subject Property Interest is described more particularly in Exhibit “A” and depicted on Exhibit “B”, which are attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. SECTION 4. The environmental effects of the acquisition of the Subject Property Interest were studied as an integral part of the environmental review for the Project. In connection with the proposed Resolution of Necessity, on January 19, 2022, City Staff reviewed the environmental documentation prepared in connection with the Project. Pursuant to the criteria of Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines and Section 21166 of the Public Resources Code, City staff concluded that no substantial changes have occurred in the Project, no substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the Project is undertaken, and that the City has obtained no new information of substantial importance that would require further environmental analysis. These environmental findings are the appropriate findings with respect to the proposed acquisition of the Subject Property Interest. SECTION 5. The Project, as planned and designed, is in the public interest and necessity and is needed to improve vehicle and rail safety, traffic mobility, and surface transportation, as more fully explained below: A.The Project requires the acquisition of additional right of way for grade separation. The Project involves the widening and construction of Etiwanda Avenue as a four- lane grade separated roadway over the SCRRA/BNSF San Gabriel subdivision, currently a two- lane at-grade crossing. The Project will construct an overhead crossing, utilizing walls and embankments to support the raised approaching roadway. It will span the railroad right-of-way and provide access to adjacent properties. The Project will widen Etiwanda Avenue to four traffic lanes including a painted median/left turn lane with bike lanes and sidewalks on each side and a Page 341 Resolution No. 2022-013 - Page 3 of 13 northbound right turn lane onto Whittram Avenue. When completed in 2024, the Project will reduce vehicle and truck delays, as well as queuing. It will improve mobility, safety, and level of service at the crossing, and it will provide for the safe transit of pedestrians, bicyclists, vehicles, trucks, and trains. Furthermore, the Project will provide for improved response times in the area for first responders such as police officers, firefighters, paramedics, and emergency medical technicians. All work is consistent with the City’s General Plan of Circulation. B.The Project will reduce vehicle and truck delays, improve safety and level of service at the crossing, and it will provide for the safe transit of pedestrians, bicyclists, vehicles, trucks, and trains. Additionally, the Project will provide for improved response times in the area for first responders such as police officers, firefighters, paramedics, and emergency medical technicians. Accordingly, the Project will benefit the residents and businesses of the City and the community as a whole. C.The Project, as planned and designed, is consistent with the Circulation Element of the General Plan, which designated Etiwanda Avenue as a four-lane major arterial road. Anticipating the future growth of the SCRRA/BNSF corridor, the City’s General Plan identified this area to be grade separated. The City seeks to acquire the Subject Property Interest for public use, namely grade separation and related purposes, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto in connection with the Project. The City seeks to construct the Project to improve mobility, safety, and level of service at the crossing. D.The Project was planned and located to minimize the impact on the adjacent properties. Because of its scope, the Project requires the acquisition of several permanent easements and temporary construction easements over portions of 10 larger parcels, as well as fee interests in two parcels owned by private property owners. The construction of the Project will require some business/residential relocations. The City will coordinate the construction with the owner of the Subject Property Interest to minimize the impact of the Project on the parcel. Based on the timing of the Project, it is necessary that the City consider the acquisition by eminent domain of the required Subject Property Interest. SECTION 6. A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 7260 et seq., the City of Rancho Cucamonga obtained a fair market value appraisal of the BTC III Parcel, the approximate 401 square foot permanent easement, the approximate 14,801 square foot permanent easement, and the approximate 7,936 square foot temporary construction easement with a term of 30 months the City seeks to acquire for public use public use, namely grade separation and related purposes, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto. B.The City set just compensation in accordance with the appraised fair market value, and extended a written offer on December 3, 2021 to BTC III Rancho Cucamonga Logistics Center, LP, the owner of record. The fair market value appraisal used a date of value of October 14, 2021. C.The City’s written offer included an informational pamphlet describing the eminent domain process and the record owner’s rights under the Eminent Domain Law. In accordance with Government Code Section 7267.2, the City’s written offer contained a written statement of, and summary of the basis for, the amount it established as just compensation. The offer set forth the date of value utilized by the appraiser and explained the appraiser’s opinion of the highest and best use of the larger parcel. It explained the applicable zoning designation of Page 342 Resolution No. 2022-013 - Page 4 of 13 the larger parcel. The City’s offer also summarized the principal transactions relied on by the appraiser to arrive at the appraiser’s opinion of value. In addition, the written offer explained the appraiser’s valuation analysis, including severance damages. It included the City’s comparable market data relied on by the appraiser. Further, the City offered, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1263.025, to pay the record owner the reasonable costs, up to $5,000.00, for an independent appraisal of the approximate 401 square foot permanent easement area, the approximate 14,801 square foot permanent easement area, and the approximate 7,936 square foot temporary construction easement area. SECTION 7. The City provided written notice to the owner of record, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1245.235 of the City Council’s intent to consider the adoption of a Resolution of Necessity for the acquisition of the Subject Property Interest by eminent domain. SECTION 8. The public use for which the City seeks to acquire the Subject Property Interest, namely grade separation and related purposes, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto, will not unreasonably interfere with or impair the continuance of the public use to which any easement holders may have appropriated the area (Code of Civil Procedure Section 1240.510). Further, the Project may require the relocation of several utilities to the new right-of- way area. The public use for which the City seeks to acquire the Subject Property Interest, namely grade separation and related purposes, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto, is a more necessary public use within the meaning of Code of Civil Procedure Section 1240.650 than the uses to which public utility easement holders have appropriated any utility easements located on or within the area of the Subject Property Interest that are affected by the Project. Accordingly, the City is authorized to acquire the Subject Property Interest pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Sections 1240.510, 1240.610, and 1240.650. SECTION 9. Based on the evidence presented at the hearing regarding the Project, including the Agenda Report and documents referenced therein and any oral and written testimony at the hearing, the City Council hereby finds and determines that: A.The public interest and necessity require the Project; B.The Project is planned and located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury; C.The Subject Property Interest described more particularly in Exhibit “A” and depicted on Exhibit “B” hereto, is necessary for the Project; and D.The City has made the offer required by Government Code Section 7267.2 to the record owner of the Subject Property Interest the City seeks to acquire. SECTION 10. The findings and declarations contained in this Resolution are based upon the record before the City Council, including the Agenda Report and all documents referenced therein, all of which are incorporated herein by this reference, and any testimony and/or comments submitted to the City by the record owner and or the owner’s representative(s). These documents include, but are not limited to the City of Rancho Cucamonga’s General Plan, the offer letter sent to the owner pursuant to Government Code Section 7267.2, the notice to the record owner pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1245.235 of the City’s intent to consider the adoption of the Resolution of Necessity, Grade Separation Plans for the Project, and the Notice of Exemption for the Project. Page 343 Resolution No. 2022-013 - Page 5 of 13 SECTION 11. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby authorizes and directs the City Attorney’s Office to take all steps necessary to commence and prosecute legal proceedings in a court of competent jurisdiction to acquire an approximate 401 square foot permanent easement, the approximate 14,801 square foot permanent easement, and an approximate 7,936 square foot temporary construction easement with a term of 30 months for the Project. The Subject Property Interest is described more particularly on Exhibit “A” and depicted on Exhibit “B” hereto. SECTION 12. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby authorizes the City Manager to execute all necessary documents in connection with the eminent domain proceeding. SECTION 13. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 19th day of January, 2022. ________________________ L. Dennis Michael, Mayor City of Rancho Cucamonga ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk City of Rancho Cucamonga APPROVED AS TO FORM: Nicholas R. Ghirelli, City Attorney Richards, Watson & Gershon CERTIFICATION: I, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2022-013, was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on the 19th day of January, 2022, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ___________________________ Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk City of Rancho Cucamonga, California Page 344 Exhibit A Legal Description Etiwanda Grade Separation Project APN 229-283-79 / BTC III Rancho Cucamonga Logistics Center, LP Permanent Road Easements Page 1 of 2 Pages Those portions of Parcel 7, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, as described in the Certificate of Compliance No. 405 for Lot Line Adjustment, recorded October 8, 1997 as Document No. 19970371135 of Official Records, records of said County, described as follows: Permanent Road Easement 1 (PRE1) Commencing at the intersection of the north line of said Parcel 7 with the west line of Etiwanda Avenue, fifty (50) foot half-width, as described in the Irrevocable Offer To Dedicate, recorded October 8, 1997 as Document No. 19970371136 of Official Records of said County, as both are shown on Sheet 10 of Record of Survey 19-0109 filed in Book 168, Pages 53 through 63 of Record of Surveys, records of said County; Thence, along said west line of Etiwanda Avenue, S 00°07'00" W, a distance of 41.95 feet to the True Point of Beginning; Thence 15t, continuing along said west line, S 00°07'00" W, a distance of 100.19 feet; Thence 2nd, leaving said west line, N 90°00'00" W, a distance of 4.00 feet to a line parallel with, and lying 4.00 feet west of said west line of Etiwanda Avenue; Thence 3rd, along said parallel line, N 00°07'00" E, a distance of 100.20 feet; Thence 4th, leaving said parallel line, at right angles, S 89Y53'00" E, a distance of 4.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning Containing 401 square feet, more or less. Permanent Road Easement 2 (PRE2) Commencing at the intersection of the north line of said Parcel 7 with the west line of Etiwanda Avenue, fifty (50) feet wide, as described in the Irrevocable Offer To Dedicate, recorded October 8, 1997 as Document No. 19970371136 of Official Records of said County, as both are shown on Sheet 10 of Record of Survey 19-0109 filed in Book 168, Pages 53 through 63 of Record of Surveys, records of said County; Thence, along said west line, S 00°07'00" W, a distance of 366.21 feet to its intersection with the line between Sections 8 and 17, T1S, R6W, SBBM, said intersection being an angle point in said west line of Etiwanda Avenue; Thence, continuing along said west line, S 00°17'46" W, a distance of 520.03 feet to the True Point of Beginning; Thence 15t, continuing along said west line, S00°17'46"W, a distance of 32.03 feet to the north line of the 22' x 170' Road Easement described in the document recorded January 23, 1997 as Document No. 19970023099 of Official Records of said County; Thence 2nd, along said north line, N 89°42'14" W, a distance of 2.00 feet to the northwest corner of said Road Easement; Thence 3rd, along the west line of said Road Easement, S 00°17'46" W, a distance of 169.99 feet to the southwest corner thereof; Job No. 0618-00016 BTC III Rancho Cucamonga Logistics Center, LP - PRE Exhibit A-1 :1111•,11 GuiDA• • ••• :Will■: SURVEYING INC. Exhibit A Legal Description Etiwanda Grade Separation Project APN 229-283-79 / RRI Energy Permanent Road Easements Page 1 of 2 Pages Job No. 0618-00016 RRI Energy PRE.docx Those portions of Parcel 7, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, as described in the Certificate of Compliance No. 405 for Lot Line Adjustment, recorded October 8, 1997 as Document No. 19970371135 of Official Records, records of said County, described as follows: Permanent Road Easement 1 (PRE1) Commencing at the intersection of the north line of said Parcel 7 with the west line of Etiwanda Avenue, fifty (50) foot half-width, as described in the Irrevocable Offer To Dedicate, recorded October 8, 1997 as Document No. 19970371136 of Official Records of said County, as both are shown on Sheet 10 of Record of Survey 19-0109 filed in Book 168, Pages 53 through 63 of Record of Surveys, records of said County; Thence, along said west line of Etiwanda Avenue, S 00°07'00" W, a distance of 41.95 feet to the True Point of Beginning; Thence 1st, continuing along said west line, S 00°07'00" W, a distance of 100.19 feet; Thence 2nd, leaving said west line, N 90°00'00" W, a distance of 4.00 feet to a line parallel with, and lying 4.00 feet west of said west line of Etiwanda Avenue; Thence 3rd, along said parallel line, N 00°07'00" E, a distance of 100.20 feet; Thence 4th, leaving said parallel line, at right angles, S 89°53’00” E, a distance of 4.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning Containing 401 square feet, more or less. Permanent Road Easement 2 (PRE2) Commencing at the intersection of the north line of said Parcel 7 with the west line of Etiwanda Avenue, fifty (50) feet wide, as described in the Irrevocable Offer To Dedicate, recorded October 8, 1997 as Document No. 19970371136 of Official Records of said County, as both are shown on Sheet 10 of Record of Survey 19-0109 filed in Book 168, Pages 53 through 63 of Record of Surveys, records of said County; Thence, along said west line, S 00°07'00" W, a distance of 366.21 feet to its intersection with the line between Sections 8 and 17, T1S, R6W, SBBM, said intersection being an angle point in said west line of Etiwanda Avenue; Thence, continuing along said west line, S 00°17'46" W, a distance of 520.03 feet to the True Point of Beginning; Thence 1st, continuing along said west line, S00°17'46"W, a distance of 32.03 feet to the north line of the 22’ x 170’ Road Easement described in the document recorded January 23, 1997 as Document No. 19970023099 of Official Records of said County; Thence 2nd, along said north line, N 89°42'14" W, a distance of 2.00 feet to the northwest corner of said Road Easement; Thence 3rd, along the west line of said Road Easement, S 00°17'46" W, a distance of 169.99 feet to the southwest corner thereof; APN 229-283-79 / BTC III Rancho Cucamonga Logistics Center, LP Job No. 0618-00016 BTC III Rancho Cucamonga Logistics Center, LP - PRE Exhibit A-1 Resolution No. 2022-013 - Page 6 of 13 Page 345 Exhibit A Legal Description Etiwanda Grade Separation Project APN 229-283-79 / BTC III Rancho Cucamonga Logistics Center, LP Permanent Road Easements Page 2 of 2 Pages Thence 4th, along the south line of said Road Easement, S 89°42'14" E, a distance of 2.00 feet to the said west line of Etiwanda Avenue described in said Irrevocable Offer To Dedicate; Thence 5th, along said west line, S 00°17'46" W, a distance of 136.95 feet; Thence 6th, leaving said west line, N 89°42'14" W, a distance of 5.00 feet; Thence 7th, N 00°17'46" E, a distance of 45.00 feet; Thence 8th, N 16°35'18" W, a distance of 72.00 feet; Thence 9th, N 00°17'46" E, a distance of 18.00 feet; Thence 10th, N 53°14'51" W, a distance of 67.00 feet; Thence 11th, N 00°17'46" E, a distance of 112.00 feet; Thence 12th, N 53°50'24" E, a distance of 93.00 feet; Thence 13th, S 89°42'14" E, a distance of 5.00 feet to the True Point Beginning. Containing 14,801 square feet, more or less. Notes ( The above legal description is based on the dimensions, information, and land references shown on Record of Survey 19-0109 filed in Book 168, Pages 53 through 63 of Record of Surveys. ( Bearings and distances are referenced to the California Coordinate System, Zone 5 grid, NAD83(2011) CSRS Epoch 2017.50. To obtain ground level distances, multiply grid distances by 1.000060364. This descript n b Surveyors Act. repa d by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land Justin P. Height, LS 6167 10-04-2021 Date Job No. 0618-00016 BTC III Rancho Cucamonga Logistics Center, LP - PRE GUIDA SURVEYING INC. Exhibit A Legal Description Etiwanda Grade Separation Project APN 229-283-79 / RRI Energy Permanent Road Easements Page 2 of 2 Pages Job No. 0618-00016 RRI Energy PRE.docx 10-04-2021 Thence 4th, along the south line of said Road Easement, S 89°42'14" E, a distance of 2.00 feet to the said west line of Etiwanda Avenue described in said Irrevocable Offer To Dedicate; Thence 5th, along said west line, S 00°17'46" W, a distance of 136.95 feet; Thence 6th, leaving said west line, N 89°42'14" W, a distance of 5.00 feet; Thence 7th, N 00°17'46" E, a distance of 45.00 feet; Thence 8th, N 16°35'18" W, a distance of 72.00 feet; Thence 9th, N 00°17'46" E, a distance of 18.00 feet; Thence 10th, N 53°14'51" W, a distance of 67.00 feet; Thence 11th, N 00°17'46" E, a distance of 112.00 feet; Thence 12th, N 53°50'24" E, a distance of 93.00 feet; Thence 13th, S 89°42'14" E, a distance of 5.00 feet to the True Point Beginning. Containing 14,801 square feet, more or less. Notes · The above legal description is based on the dimensions, information, and land references shown on Record of Survey 19-0109 filed in Book 168, Pages 53 through 63 of Record of Surveys. · Bearings and distances are referenced to the California Coordinate System, Zone 5 grid, NAD83(2011) CSRS Epoch 2017.50. To obtain ground level distances, multiply grid distances by 1.000060364. This description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land Surveyors Act. __________________________________________ Justin P. Height, PLS 6167 Date APN 229-283-79 / BTC III Rancho Cucamonga Logistics Center, LP Job No. 0618-00016 BTC III Rancho Cucamonga Logistics Center, LP - PRE Resolution No. 2022-013 - Page 7 of 13 Page 346 Exhibit A Legal Description Etiwanda Grade Separation Project APN 229-283-79 / BTC Ill Rancho Cucamonga Logistics Center, LP Temporary Construction Easement Page 1 of 1 Pages That portion of Parcel 7, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, as described in the Certificate of Compliance No. 405 for Lot Line Adjustment, recorded October 8, 1997 as Document No. 19970371135 of Official Records, records of said County, described as follows: Commencing at the intersection of the north line of said Parcel 7 with the west line of Etiwanda Avenue, fifty (50) foot half-width, as described in the Irrevocable Offer To Dedicate recorded October 8, 1997 as Document No. 19970371136 of Official Records of said County, as both are shown on Sheet 10 of Record of Survey 19-0109 filed in Book 168, Pages 53 through 63 of Record of Surveys, records of said County; Thence, along said west line of Etiwanda Avenue, S 00°07'00" W, a distance of 142.14 feet to the True Point of Beginning; Thence 1st, continuing along said west line, S 00°07'00" W, a distance of 224.07 feet to its intersection with the line between Sections 8 and 17, T15, R6W, SBBM, said intersection being an angle point in said west line of Etiwanda Avenue; Thence r d, continuing along said west line, S 00°17'46" W, a distance of 520.03 feet; Thence 3rd, leaving said west line, and perpendicular to said west line, N 89°42'14" W, a distance of 5.00 feet to a line parallel with, and lying 5.00 feet west of said west line of Etiwanda Avenue; Thence 4th, along said parallel line, N 00°17'46" E, a distance of 463.00; Thence 5th, leaving said parallel line, N 89°43'25" W, a distance of 15.00 feet to a line parallel with, and lying 20.00 feet west of, said west line of Etiwanda Avenue as said west line is described in the 2nd course above; Thence 6th, along last said parallel line, N 00°17'46" E, a distance of 57.00 feet to its intersection with the line between Sections 8 and 17, T1S, R6W, SBBM; Thence 7th, along a line parallel with, and lying 20.00 feet west of, said west line of Etiwanda Avenue as said west line is described in the 1st course above, N 00°07'00" E, a distance of 224.00 feet; Thence 8th, leaving said parallel line, N 90°00'00" E, a distance of 20.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Containing 7,936 square feet, more or less. Notes ( The above legal description is based on the dimensions, information, and land references shown on Record of Survey 19-0109 filed in Book 168, Pages 53 through 63 of Record of Surveys. ( Bearings and distances are referenced to the California Coordinate System, Zone 5 grid, NAD83(2011) CSRS Epoch 2017.50. To obtain ground level distances, multiply grid distances by 1.000060364. This descript s n b Act. n 'repa d by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land Surveyors Justin P. Height, IS 6167 10-04-2021 Date Job No. 0618-00016 BTC III Rancho Cucamonga Logistics Center, LP - TCE Exhibit A-2 .•..•. GUIDA • ... LEE.: SURVEYING INC. Exhibit A Legal Description Etiwanda Grade Separation Project APN 229-283-79 / RRI Energy Temporary Construction Easement Page 1 of 1 Pages Job No. 0618-00016 RRI Energy TCE.docx 10-04-2021 That portion of Parcel 7, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, as described in the Certificate of Compliance No. 405 for Lot Line Adjustment, recorded October 8, 1997 as Document No. 19970371135 of Official Records, records of said County, described as follows: Commencing at the intersection of the north line of said Parcel 7 with the west line of Etiwanda Avenue, fifty (50) foot half-width, as described in the Irrevocable Offer To Dedicate recorded October 8, 1997 as Document No. 19970371136 of Official Records of said County, as both are shown on Sheet 10 of Record of Survey 19-0109 filed in Book 168, Pages 53 through 63 of Record of Surveys, records of said County; Thence, along said west line of Etiwanda Avenue, S 00°07'00" W, a distance of 142.14 feet to the True Point of Beginning; Thence 1st, continuing along said west line, S 00°07'00" W, a distance of 224.07 feet to its intersection with the line between Sections 8 and 17, T1S, R6W, SBBM, said intersection being an angle point in said west line of Etiwanda Avenue; Thence 2nd, continuing along said west line, S 00°17'46" W, a distance of 520.03 feet; Thence 3rd, leaving said west line, and perpendicular to said west line, N 89°42'14" W, a distance of 5.00 feet to a line parallel with, and lying 5.00 feet west of said west line of Etiwanda Avenue; Thence 4th, along said parallel line, N 00°17'46" E, a distance of 463.00; Thence 5th, leaving said parallel line, N 89°43'25" W, a distance of 15.00 feet to a line parallel with, and lying 20.00 feet west of, said west line of Etiwanda Avenue as said west line is described in the 2nd course above; Thence 6th, along last said parallel line, N 00°17'46" E, a distance of 57.00 feet to its intersection with the line between Sections 8 and 17, T1S, R6W, SBBM; Thence 7th, along a line parallel with, and lying 20.00 feet west of, said west line of Etiwanda Avenue as said west line is described in the 1st course above, N 00°07'00" E, a distance of 224.00 feet; Thence 8th, leaving said parallel line, N 90°00'00" E, a distance of 20.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Containing 7,936 square feet, more or less. Notes · The above legal description is based on the dimensions, information, and land references shown on Record of Survey 19-0109 filed in Book 168, Pages 53 through 63 of Record of Surveys. · Bearings and distances are referenced to the California Coordinate System, Zone 5 grid, NAD83(2011) CSRS Epoch 2017.50. To obtain ground level distances, multiply grid distances by 1.000060364. This description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land Surveyors Act. __________________________________________ Justin P. Height, PLS 6167 Date APN 229-283-79 / BTC III Rancho Cucamonga Logistics Center, LP Job No. 0618-00016 BTC III Rancho Cucamonga Logistics Center, LP - TCE Exhibit A-2 Resolution No. 2022-013 - Page 8 of 13 Page 347 j-al!cippca NOTES SBCTA RAIL CORRIDOR POC NORTH LINE OF PARCEL 7 SE'D a• 71 S, COC NO. 405 FOR LLA SAAM DOC NO 19970371135 OR PRE1 401 SQ. FT. (SEE PAGE 2) SAC 17; 718; Rb1/11; SAAM LINE BEI WEEN SECTION 8 AND SECTION 17 MENU MENU MENU MENEEN MENEEN MENNEN GUIDA SURVEYING INC. Job No. 0618-00016 PAR3E'L 7/ 000 NOJ 405 P'OR LLA 003 N0 1997/037/1 135 OR WEST LINE OF E 'WANDA AVE PER IRREV. OFFER TO DEDICATE DOC. NO. 19970371136 OR PRE2 14,801 SQ. FT. (SEE PAGE 3) THIS PLAT HAS BEEN PREPARED BY ME, OR UNDER MY DI TION, IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE PR L LAND SURVEYORS ACT. 10-04-2021 JUSTIN P. HEIGIRTNPLS 6167 DATE ETIWANDA AVENUE PLAT MAP IS BASED ON THE INFORMATION AND LAND REFERENCES SHOWN ON RECORD OF SURVEY 19-0109 FILED IN BOOK 168, PAGES 53 THROUGH 63 OF RECORD OF SURVEYS. BEARINGS AND DISTANCES ARE REFERENCED TO THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM, ZONE 5 GRID, NAD83(2011) CSRS EPOCH 2017.50. TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES, MULTIPLY GRID DISTANCES BY 1.000060364. SCALE: 1"=.400' Exhibit B Plat Map Etiwanda Grade Separation Project APN 229-283-79 / BTC III R.C.L.C., LP Permanent Road Easements Page 1 of 3 Pages j-al!cippca NOTES SBCTA RAIL CORRIDOR POC NORTH LINE OF PARCEL 7 SE'D a• 71 S, COC NO. 405 FOR LLA SAAM DOC NO 19970371135 OR PRE1 401 SQ. FT. (SEE PAGE 2) SAC 17; 718; Rb1/11; SAAM LINE BEI WEEN SECTION 8 AND SECTION 17 MENU MENU MENU MENEEN MENEEN MENNEN GUIDA SURVEYING INC. Job No. 0618-00016 PAR3E'L 7/ 000 NOJ 405 P'OR LLA 003 N0 1997/037/1 135 OR WEST LINE OF E 'WANDA AVE PER IRREV. OFFER TO DEDICATE DOC. NO. 19970371136 OR PRE2 14,801 SQ. FT. (SEE PAGE 3) THIS PLAT HAS BEEN PREPARED BY ME, OR UNDER MY DI TION, IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE PR L LAND SURVEYORS ACT. 10-04-2021 JUSTIN P. HEIGIRTNPLS 6167 DATE ETIWANDA AVENUE PLAT MAP IS BASED ON THE INFORMATION AND LAND REFERENCES SHOWN ON RECORD OF SURVEY 19-0109 FILED IN BOOK 168, PAGES 53 THROUGH 63 OF RECORD OF SURVEYS. BEARINGS AND DISTANCES ARE REFERENCED TO THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM, ZONE 5 GRID, NAD83(2011) CSRS EPOCH 2017.50. TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES, MULTIPLY GRID DISTANCES BY 1.000060364. SCALE: 1"=.400' Exhibit B Plat Map Etiwanda Grade Separation Project APN 229-283-79 / BTC III R.C.L.C., LP Permanent Road Easements Page 1 of 3 Pages APN 229-283-79 / BTC III R.C.L.C., LPExhibit B-1Resolution No. 2022-013 - Page 9 of 13 &nbsp;&nbsp;Page 348 COURSE TABLE LINE BETWEEN SECTION 8 AND SECTION 17 0 LU L1 S00°07'00"W 41.95[TIE] L2 S00°07'00"W 100.19' L3 N90°00'00"W 4.00' L4 N00° 07'00"E 100.20' L5 S89°53'00"E 4.00' NORTH LINE OF PARCEL 7 COC NO. 405 FOR LLA DOC NO 19970371135 OR PAR3E'L 7/ 303 NC 405 5CR LLA 003J NO J 997/037/J J 35 OR ANGLE POINT IN WEST LINE OF ETIWANDA AVE U) 23 PRE1 401 SQ. FT. 0 0 4.00' L3 L4 L5 TPOB POC "•••( x xxxxxxx L2 0 LU L1 [TIE] WEST LINE OF ETIWANDA AVE PER IRREV. OFFER TO DEDICATE DOC. NO. 19970371136 OR GUIDA SURVEYING INC. Job No. 0618-00016 ETIWANDA AVENUE SCALE: 1"=50' Exhibit B Plat Map Etiwanda Grade Separation Project APN 229-283-79 / BTC III R.C.L.C., LP Permanent Road Easements Page 2 of 3 Pages COURSE TABLE LINE BETWEEN SECTION 8 AND SECTION 17 0 LU L1 S00°07'00"W 41.95[TIE] L2 S00°07'00"W 100.19' L3 N90°00'00"W 4.00' L4 N00° 07'00"E 100.20' L5 S89°53'00"E 4.00' NORTH LINE OF PARCEL 7 COC NO. 405 FOR LLA DOC NO 19970371135 OR PAR3E'L 7/ 303 NC 405 5CR LLA 003J NO J 997/037/J J 35 OR ANGLE POINT IN WEST LINE OF ETIWANDA AVE U) 23 PRE1 401 SQ. FT. 0 0 4.00' L3 L4 L5 TPOB POC "•••( x xxxxxxx L2 0 LU L1 [TIE] WEST LINE OF ETIWANDA AVE PER IRREV. OFFER TO DEDICATE DOC. NO. 19970371136 OR GUIDA SURVEYING INC. Job No. 0618-00016 ETIWANDA AVENUE SCALE: 1"=50' Exhibit B Plat Map Etiwanda Grade Separation Project APN 229-283-79 / BTC III R.C.L.C., LP Permanent Road Easements Page 2 of 3 Pages Original had error? APN 229-283-79 / BTC III R.C.L.C., LPResolution No. 2022-013 - Page 10 of 13 &nbsp;&nbsp;Page 349 COURSE TABLE L1 SOO°07'00"W 366.21 TIE L2 SOO°17'46"W 520.03 TIE L3 SOO°17'46"W 32.03' L4 N89°42'14"W 2.00' L5 SOO°17'46"W 169.99' L6 S89°42'14"E 2.00' L7 SOO°17'46"W 136.95' L8 N89°42'14"W 5.00' L9 NOO°17'46"E 45.00' L10 N16°35'18"W 72.00' L1 1 NOO°17'46"E 18.00' L12 N53°14'51"W 67.00' L13 NOO°17'46"E 112.00' L14 N53°50'24"E 93.00' L15 S89°42'14"E 5.00' L8 L9 L1 1 0 LU L7 LINE BETWEEN SECTION 8 AND SECTION 17 L13 -•• 4 A: • •••• 4* L5 L6 N L4 L15 /7 -TPOB L2 [TIE] L3 NORTH LINE OF PARCEL 7 COC NO. 405 FOR LLA DOC NO 19970371135 OR ANGLE POINT IN WEST LINE OF ETIWANDA AVE PRE1 (SEE PAGE 2) L1 [TIE] 0 LU co F O O 7POC 22'X170' ROAD EASEMENT PER DOC. NO. 19970023099 OR Umml if' GUI DA Um.. .9.9.9 SURVEYING INC. Job No. 0618-00016 ETNANDA AVENUE SCALE: 1"=100' WEST LINE OF ETIWANDA AVE PER IRREV. OFFER TO DEDICATE DOC. NO. 19970371136 OR Exhibit B Plat Map Etiwanda Grade Separation Project APN 229-283-79 / BTC III R.C.L.C., LP Permanent Road Easements Page 3 of 3 Pages COURSE TABLE L1 SOO°07'00"W 366.21 TIE L2 SOO°17'46"W 520.03 TIE L3 SOO°17'46"W 32.03' L4 N89°42'14"W 2.00' L5 SOO°17'46"W 169.99' L6 S89°42'14"E 2.00' L7 SOO°17'46"W 136.95' L8 N89°42'14"W 5.00' L9 NOO°17'46"E 45.00' L10 N16°35'18"W 72.00' L1 1 NOO°17'46"E 18.00' L12 N53°14'51"W 67.00' L13 NOO°17'46"E 112.00' L14 N53°50'24"E 93.00' L15 S89°42'14"E 5.00' L8 L9 L1 1 0 LU L7 LINE BETWEEN SECTION 8 AND SECTION 17 L13 -•• 4 A: • •••• 4* L5 L6 N L4 L15 /7 -TPOB L2 [TIE] L3 NORTH LINE OF PARCEL 7 COC NO. 405 FOR LLA DOC NO 19970371135 OR ANGLE POINT IN WEST LINE OF ETIWANDA AVE PRE1 (SEE PAGE 2) L1 [TIE] 0 LU co F O O 7POC 22'X170' ROAD EASEMENT PER DOC. NO. 19970023099 OR Umml if' GUI DA Um.. .9.9.9 SURVEYING INC. Job No. 0618-00016 ETNANDA AVENUE SCALE: 1"=100' WEST LINE OF ETIWANDA AVE PER IRREV. OFFER TO DEDICATE DOC. NO. 19970371136 OR Exhibit B Plat Map Etiwanda Grade Separation Project APN 229-283-79 / BTC III R.C.L.C., LP Permanent Road Easements Page 3 of 3 Pages APN 229-283-79 / BTC III R.C.L.C., LPResolution No. 2022-013 - Page 11 of 13 &nbsp;&nbsp;Page 350 z-al!cRtpca NOTES SBCTA RAIL CORRIDOR \_. NORTH LINE OF PARCEL 7 SE p 8; 71S; COC NO. 405 FOR LLA R6W; S M DOC NO 19970371135 OR POC TEMP. CONST. EASEMENT 7,936 SQ. FT. (SEE PAGE 2) SE'D 17; 718;,, R6W; aaE3IVI LINE BE I WEEN SECTION 8 AND SECTION 17 MENU MENU MENU MENEEN MENEEN MENNEN GUIDA SURVEYING INC. Job No. 0618-00016 PAROE'L 7/ 303 NOJ 405 P'OR LLA 1-30.3 ]\10 1997/037/1 135 OR WEST LINE OF E I IWANDA AVE PER IRREV. OFFER TO DEDICATE DOC. NO. 19970371136 OR THIS PLAT HAS BEEN PREPARED BY ME, OR UNDER MY DI TION, IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE PR L LAND SURVEYORS ACT. 10-04-2021 JUSTIN P. HEIGIRTNPLS 6167 DATE ETIWANDA AVENUE PLAT MAP IS BASED ON THE INFORMATION AND LAND REFERENCES SHOWN ON THE RECORD OF SURVEY 19-0109 FILED IN BOOK 168, PAGES 53 THROUGH 63 OF RECORD OF SURVEYS. BEARINGS AND DISTANCES ARE REFERENCED TO THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM, ZONE 5 GRID, NAD83(2011) CSRS EPOCH 2017.50. TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES, MULTIPLY GRID DISTANCES BY 1.000060364. SCALE: 1"=.400' Exhibit B Plat Map Etiwanda Grade Separation Project APN 229-283-79 / BTC III R.C.L.C., LP Temporary Construction Easement Page 1 of 2 Pages z-al!cRtpca NOTES SBCTA RAIL CORRIDOR \_. NORTH LINE OF PARCEL 7 SE p 8; 71S; COC NO. 405 FOR LLA R6W; S M DOC NO 19970371135 OR POC TEMP. CONST. EASEMENT 7,936 SQ. FT. (SEE PAGE 2) SE'D 17; 718;,, R6W; aaE3IVI LINE BE I WEEN SECTION 8 AND SECTION 17 MENU MENU MENU MENEEN MENEEN MENNEN GUIDA SURVEYING INC. Job No. 0618-00016 PAROE'L 7/ 303 NOJ 405 P'OR LLA 1-30.3 ]\10 1997/037/1 135 OR WEST LINE OF E I IWANDA AVE PER IRREV. OFFER TO DEDICATE DOC. NO. 19970371136 OR THIS PLAT HAS BEEN PREPARED BY ME, OR UNDER MY DI TION, IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE PR L LAND SURVEYORS ACT. 10-04-2021 JUSTIN P. HEIGIRTNPLS 6167 DATE ETIWANDA AVENUE PLAT MAP IS BASED ON THE INFORMATION AND LAND REFERENCES SHOWN ON THE RECORD OF SURVEY 19-0109 FILED IN BOOK 168, PAGES 53 THROUGH 63 OF RECORD OF SURVEYS. BEARINGS AND DISTANCES ARE REFERENCED TO THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM, ZONE 5 GRID, NAD83(2011) CSRS EPOCH 2017.50. TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES, MULTIPLY GRID DISTANCES BY 1.000060364. SCALE: 1"=.400' Exhibit B Plat Map Etiwanda Grade Separation Project APN 229-283-79 / BTC III R.C.L.C., LP Temporary Construction Easement Page 1 of 2 Pages APN 229-283-79 / BTC III R.C.L.C., LPExhibit B-2Resolution No. 2022-013 - Page 12 of 13 &nbsp;&nbsp;Page 351 COURSE TABLE L1 SOO°07'00"W 142.14VIE] L2 SOO°07'00"W 224.07 L3 SOO°17'46"W 520.03' L4 N89°42'14"W 5.00' L5 NOO°17'46"E 463.00' L6 N89°43'25"W 15.00' L7 NOO°17'46"E 57.00' L8 NOO°07'00"E 224.00' L9 N90°00'00"E 20.00' 1:fl 1:fl 5.00' L4 0 PAR3E'L 7/ 303 NC 405 5CR LLA 003 NO 997/037/J J 35 OR WEST LINE OF E I IWAN DA AVE PER IRREV. OFFER TO DEDICATE DOC. NO. 19970371136 OR Mil' GU I DA SURVEYING INC. Job No. 0618-00016 L3 L6 ETIWANDA AVENUE ANGLE POINT IN WEST LINE OF E I IWAN DA AVE SCALE: 1"=100' L7 NORTH LINE OF PARCEL 7 COC NO. 405 FOR LLA DOC NO 19970371135 OR LINE BEI WEEN SECTION 8 AND SECTION 17 ti 20.00' L8 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT 7,936 SQ. FT. L9 TPOB P00 2:10C116600 -IIV6 V1OEIS Exhibit B Plat Map Etiwanda Grade Separation Project APN 229-283-79 / BTC III R.C.L.C., LP Temporary Construction Easement Page 2 of 2 Pages COURSE TABLE L1 SOO°07'00"W 142.14VIE] L2 SOO°07'00"W 224.07 L3 SOO°17'46"W 520.03' L4 N89°42'14"W 5.00' L5 NOO°17'46"E 463.00' L6 N89°43'25"W 15.00' L7 NOO°17'46"E 57.00' L8 NOO°07'00"E 224.00' L9 N90°00'00"E 20.00' 1:fl 1:fl 5.00' L4 0 PAR3E'L 7/ 303 NC 405 5CR LLA 003 NO 997/037/J J 35 OR WEST LINE OF E I IWAN DA AVE PER IRREV. OFFER TO DEDICATE DOC. NO. 19970371136 OR Mil' GU I DA SURVEYING INC. Job No. 0618-00016 L3 L6 ETIWANDA AVENUE ANGLE POINT IN WEST LINE OF E I IWAN DA AVE SCALE: 1"=100' L7 NORTH LINE OF PARCEL 7 COC NO. 405 FOR LLA DOC NO 19970371135 OR LINE BEI WEEN SECTION 8 AND SECTION 17 ti 20.00' L8 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT 7,936 SQ. FT. L9 TPOB P00 2:10C116600 -IIV6 V1OEIS Exhibit B Plat Map Etiwanda Grade Separation Project APN 229-283-79 / BTC III R.C.L.C., LP Temporary Construction Easement Page 2 of 2 Pages APN 229-283-79 / BTC III R.C.L.C., LPResolution No. 2022-013 - Page 13 of 13 &nbsp;&nbsp;Page 352 Resolution No. 2022-014 - Page 1 of 11 RESOLUTION NO. 2022-014 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY INTERESTS NECESSARY FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES AND AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION THEREOF IN CONNECTION WITH THE ETIWANDA GRADE SEPARATION PROJECT (PERMANENT EASEMENT AND TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT OVER A PORTION OF APN 0229-291-55) WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga (“City”) is a municipal corporation in the County of San Bernardino, State of California; and WHEREAS, the City seeks to construct the Etiwanda Grade Separation Project (“Project”). The Project requires the acquisition of additional right of way for grade separation. The Project involves the widening and construction of Etiwanda Avenue as a four-lane grade separated roadway over the Southern California Regional Rail Authority (“SCRRA”)/Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railroad (“BNSF”) San Gabriel subdivision, currently a two-lane at-grade crossing. The Project will construct an overhead crossing, utilizing walls and embankments to support the raised approaching roadway. It will span the railroad right-of-way and provide access to adjacent properties. The Project will widen Etiwanda Avenue to four traffic lanes including a painted median/left turn lane with bike lanes and sidewalks on each side and a northbound right turn lane onto Whittram Avenue. When completed in 2024, the Project will reduce vehicle and truck delays, as well as queuing. It will improve mobility, safety, and level of service at the crossing, and it will provide for the safe transit of pedestrians, bicyclists, vehicles, trucks, and trains. Furthermore, the Project will provide for improved response times in the area for first responders such as police officers, firefighters, paramedics, and emergency medical technicians. All work is consistent with the City’s General Plan of Circulation. The Plans for the Project are on file with the Engineering Services Department and are incorporated herein by this reference; and WHEREAS, the environmental effects of the Project were studied and analyzed pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq., and the CEQA Guidelines, 14 Cal. Code Regs. Section 15000 et seq. (“CEQA Guidelines”). City Staff determined that the Project was statutorily exempt pursuant to CEQA Article 18. Statutory Exemptions, Section 15282. Other Statutory Exemptions, paragraph (g) as a railroad grade separation project which eliminates and existing grade crossing or reconstructs an existing grade separation. The City Council approved the Notice of Exemption and authorized Staff to file the Notice of Exemption with the Office of Planning and Research and the County clerk as specified in Section 21080.13(2) of the Public Resources Code. Said Notice of Exemption was filed with the Office of Planning and Research and with the County of San Bernardino on or about June 11, 2018 in accordance with the statutory requirements; and WHEREAS, in connection with the proposed Resolution of Necessity, on January 19, 2022, City Staff reviewed the environmental documentation prepared in connection with the Project. Pursuant to the criteria of Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines and Section 21166 of the Public Resources Code, City Staff concluded that no substantial changes have occurred in the Project, no substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the Project is undertaken, and that the City has obtained no new information of substantial importance that would require further environmental analysis. These environmental findings are the appropriate findings with respect to the proposed acquisition of the Subject Property Interests. ATTACHMENT 7Page353 Resolution No. 2022-014 - Page 2 of 11 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1. The Rancho Cucamonga City Council adopts Resolution No. 2022-014, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, Declaring Certain Real Property Interests Necessary for Public Purposes and Authorizing the Acquisition Thereof in Connection with the Etiwanda Grade Separation Project (permanent easement and a temporary construction easement on portions of APN 0229-291-55). SECTION 2. The City seeks to acquire by eminent domain the real property interest described below in Section 3 of this Resolution for public use, namely grade separation and related purposes, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto in connection with the Etiwanda Grade Separation Project pursuant to the authority conferred on the City of Rancho Cucamonga to acquire real property by eminent domain by Section 19 of Article 1 of the California Constitution, Government Code Sections 37350, 37350.5, 37351, 40401, and 40404, California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1230.010 et seq. (Eminent Domain Law), including but not limited to Sections 1240.010, 1240.020, 1240.110, 1240.120, 1240.150, 1240.510, 1240.610, 1240.650, and by other provisions of law. SECTION 3. The City seeks to acquire an approximate 1,201 square foot permanent easement and an approximate 1,295 square foot temporary construction easement with a term of 30 months over portions of the real property located at 8939 Etiwanda Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and further identified as San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Number 0229-291-55 in connection with the Project. The permanent easement and the temporary construction easement are collectively referred to herein as “Subject Property Interest,” and APN 0229-291-55 is referred to herein as “BCORE IE Parcel.” The Subject Property Interest is described more particularly in Exhibit “A” and depicted on Exhibit “B”, which are attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. SECTION 4. The environmental effects of the acquisition of the Subject Property Interest were studied as an integral part of the environmental review for the Project. In connection with the proposed Resolution of Necessity, on January 19, 2022, City Staff reviewed the environmental documentation prepared in connection with the Project. Pursuant to the criteria of Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines and Section 21166 of the Public Resources Code, City staff concluded that no substantial changes have occurred in the Project, no substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the Project is undertaken, and that the City has obtained no new information of substantial importance that would require further environmental analysis. These environmental findings are the appropriate findings with respect to the proposed acquisition of the Subject Property Interest. SECTION 5. The Project, as planned and designed, is in the public interest and necessity and is needed to improve vehicle and rail safety, traffic mobility, and surface transportation, as more fully explained below: A.The Project requires the acquisition of additional right of way for grade separation. The Project involves the widening and construction of Etiwanda Avenue as a four- lane grade separated roadway over the SCRRA/BNSF San Gabriel subdivision, currently a two- lane at-grade crossing. The Project will construct an overhead crossing, utilizing walls and embankments to support the raised approaching roadway. It will span the railroad right-of-way and provide access to adjacent properties. The Project will widen Etiwanda Avenue to four traffic lanes including a painted median/left turn lane with bike lanes and sidewalks on each side and a Page 354 Resolution No. 2022-014 - Page 3 of 11 northbound right turn lane onto Whittram Avenue. When completed in 2024, the Project will reduce vehicle and truck delays, as well as queuing. It will improve mobility, safety, and level of service at the crossing, and it will provide for the safe transit of pedestrians, bicyclists, vehicles, trucks, and trains. Furthermore, the Project will provide for improved response times in the area for first responders such as police officers, firefighters, paramedics, and emergency medical technicians. All work is consistent with the City’s General Plan of Circulation. B. The Project will reduce vehicle and truck delays, improve safety and level of service at the crossing, and it will provide for the safe transit of pedestrians, bicyclists, vehicles, trucks, and trains. Additionally, the Project will provide for improved response times in the area for first responders such as police officers, firefighters, paramedics, and emergency medical technicians. Accordingly, the Project will benefit the residents and businesses of the City and the community as a whole. C. The Project, as planned and designed, is consistent with the Circulation Element of the General Plan, which designated Etiwanda Avenue as a four-lane major arterial road. Anticipating the future growth of the SCRRA/BNSF corridor, the City’s General Plan identified this area to be grade separated. The City seeks to acquire the Subject Property Interest for public use, namely grade separation and related purposes, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto in connection with the Project. The City seeks to construct the Project to improve mobility, safety, and level of service at the crossing. D. The Project was planned and located to minimize the impact on the adjacent properties. Because of its scope, the Project requires the acquisition of several permanent easements and temporary construction easements over portions of 10 larger parcels, as well as fee interests in two parcels owned by private property owners. The construction of the Project will require some business/residential relocations. The City will coordinate the construction with the owner of the Subject Property Interest to minimize the impact of the Project on the parcel. Based on the timing of the Project, it is necessary that the City consider the acquisition by eminent domain of the required Subject Property Interest. SECTION 6. A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 7260 et seq., the City of Rancho Cucamonga obtained a fair market value appraisal of the BCORE IE Parcel, the approximate 1,201 square foot permanent easement and the approximate 1,295 square foot temporary construction easement with a term of 30 months the City seeks to acquire for public use public use, namely grade separation and related purposes, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto. B. The City set just compensation in accordance with the appraised fair market value, and extended a written offer on December 3, 2021 to BCORE IE West Owner, LLC, the owner of record. The fair market value appraisal used a date of value of October 14, 2021. C. The City’s written offer included an informational pamphlet describing the eminent domain process and the record owner’s rights under the Eminent Domain Law. In accordance with Government Code Section 7267.2, the City’s written offer contained a written statement of, and summary of the basis for, the amount it established as just compensation. The offer set forth the date of value utilized by the appraiser and explained the appraiser’s opinion of the highest and best use of the larger parcel. It explained the applicable zoning designation of the larger parcel. The City’s offer also summarized the principal transactions relied on by the Page 355 Resolution No. 2022-014 - Page 4 of 11 appraiser to arrive at the appraiser’s opinion of value. In addition, the written offer explained the appraiser’s valuation analysis, including severance damages. It included the City’s comparable market data relied on by the appraiser. Further, the City offered, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1263.025, to pay the record owner the reasonable costs, up to $5,000.00, for an independent appraisal of the approximate 1,201 square foot permanent easement area and the approximate 1,295 square foot temporary construction easement area. SECTION 7. The City provided written notice to the owner of record, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1245.235 of the City Council’s intent to consider the adoption of a Resolution of Necessity for the acquisition of the Subject Property Interest by eminent domain. SECTION 8. The public use for which the City seeks to acquire the Subject Property Interest, namely grade separation and related purposes, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto, will not unreasonably interfere with or impair the continuance of the public use to which any easement holders may have appropriated the area (Code of Civil Procedure Section 1240.510). Further, the Project may require the relocation of several utilities to the new right-of- way area. The public use for which the City seeks to acquire the Subject Property Interest, namely grade separation and related purposes, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto, is a more necessary public use within the meaning of Code of Civil Procedure Section 1240.650 than the uses to which public utility easement holders have appropriated any utility easements located on or within the area of the Subject Property Interest that are affected by the Project. Accordingly, the City is authorized to acquire the Subject Property Interest pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Sections 1240.510, 1240.610, and 1240.650. SECTION 9. Based on the evidence presented at the hearing regarding the Project, including the Agenda Report and documents referenced therein and any oral and written testimony at the hearing, the City Council hereby finds and determines that: A.The public interest and necessity require the Project; B.The Project is planned and located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury; C.The Subject Property Interest described more particularly in Exhibit “A” and depicted on Exhibit “B” hereto, is necessary for the Project; and D.The City has made the offer required by Government Code Section 7267.2 to the record owner of the Subject Property Interest the City seeks to acquire. SECTION 10. The findings and declarations contained in this Resolution are based upon the record before the City Council, including the Agenda Report and all documents referenced therein, all of which are incorporated herein by this reference, and any testimony and/or comments submitted to the City by the record owner and or the owner’s representative(s). These documents include, but are not limited to the City of Rancho Cucamonga’s General Plan, the offer letter sent to the owner pursuant to Government Code Section 7267.2, the notice to the record owner pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1245.235 of the City’s intent to consider the adoption of the Resolution of Necessity, Grade Separation Plans for the Project, and the Notice of Exemption for the Project. SECTION 11. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby authorizes and directs the City Attorney’s Office to take all steps necessary to commence and prosecute legal Page 356 Resolution No. 2022-014 - Page 5 of 11 proceedings in a court of competent jurisdiction to acquire an approximate 1,201 square foot permanent easement and an approximate 1,295 square foot temporary construction easement with a term of 30 months for the Project. The Subject Property Interest is described more particularly on Exhibit “A” and depicted on Exhibit “B” hereto. SECTION 12. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby authorizes the City Manager to execute all necessary documents in connection with the eminent domain proceeding. SECTION 13. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 19th day of January, 2022. ________________________ L. Dennis Michael, Mayor City of Rancho Cucamonga ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk City of Rancho Cucamonga APPROVED AS TO FORM: Nicholas R. Ghirelli, City Attorney Richards, Watson & Gershon CERTIFICATION: I, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2022-014, was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on the 19th day of January, 2022, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ___________________________ Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk City of Rancho Cucamonga, California Page 357 Exhibit A Legal Description Etiwanda Grade Separation Project APN 229-291-55 Permanent Road Easement Page 1 of 1 Pages That portion of Parcel 1, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, as described in the Certificate of Compliance No. 507 for Lot Line Adjustment, recorded January 17, 2002 as Document No. 20020026839 of Official Records, records of said County, described as follows: Commencing at the intersection of the westerly prolongation of the south line of said Parcel 1 with the centerline of Etiwanda Avenue, thirty (30) foot half-width, being also the northwest corner of the fifty (50) street easement dedication described in the Easement Deed recorded April 17, 1998 as Document No. 19980145780 of Official Records of said County, as both are shown on Sheet 8 of Record of Survey 19-0109 filed in Book 168, Pages 53 through 63 of Record of Surveys, records of said County; Thence, along said prolongation of the south line of Parcel 1, N 87°55'05" E, a distance of 30.02 feet to a point on the east line of Etiwanda Avenue as shown on the map of Tract 2102 (Fontana Arrow Route Tract") filed in Book 31, Pages 11 to 15 of Maps, records of said County, said point being the True Point of Beginning; Thence V, along said east line of Etiwanda Avenue, N 00°07'00" E, a distance of 60.04 feet to the north line of said Parcel 1, being also the south line of the SBCTA Rail Corridor, one hundred (100) feet wide, as shown on said Record of Survey 19-0109; Thence rd, along said north line of Parcel 1, N 87°55'05" E, a distance of 20.01 feet to its intersection with the northerly prolongation of the east line of said fifty (50) street easement dedication; Thence VI, along said prolongation, S 00°07'00" W, a distance of 60.04 feet to a point on said south line of Parcel 1, said point being the northeast corner of said fifty (50) street easement dedication; Thence 41h, along said south line, S 87°55'05" W, a distance of 20.01 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Containing 1,201 square feet, more or less. Notes ( The above legal description is based on the dimensions, information, and land references shown on Record of Survey 19-0109 filed in Book 168, Pages 53 through 63 of Record of Surveys. ( Bearings and distances are referenced to the California Coordinate System, Zone 5 grid, NAD83(2011) CSRS Epoch 2017.50. To obtain ground level distances, multiply grid distances by 1.000060364. This descript Act. Justin P. Height, LS 6167 Job No. 0818-00018 BCORE PRE.doc d by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land Surveyors 10-07-2021 Date Exhibit A-1 ,...... GUIDA • . .•. :am: SURVEYING INC. Exhibit A Legal Description Etiwanda Grade Separation Project APN 229-291-55 Permanent Road Easement Page 1 of 1 Pages Job No. 0618-00016 BCORE PRE.docx 10-07-2021 That portion of Parcel 1, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, as described in the Certificate of Compliance No. 507 for Lot Line Adjustment, recorded January 17, 2002 as Document No. 20020026839 of Official Records, records of said County, described as follows: Commencing at the intersection of the westerly prolongation of the south line of said Parcel 1 with the centerline of Etiwanda Avenue, thirty (30) foot half-width, being also the northwest corner of the fifty (50) street easement dedication described in the Easement Deed recorded April 17, 1998 as Document No. 19980145780 of Official Records of said County, as both are shown on Sheet 8 of Record of Survey 19-0109 filed in Book 168, Pages 53 through 63 of Record of Surveys, records of said County; Thence, along said prolongation of the south line of Parcel 1, N 87°55'05" E, a distance of 30.02 feet to a point on the east line of Etiwanda Avenue as shown on the map of Tract 2102 (Fontana Arrow Route Tract”) filed in Book 31, Pages 11 to 15 of Maps, records of said County, said point being the True Point of Beginning; Thence 1st, along said east line of Etiwanda Avenue, N 00°07'00" E, a distance of 60.04 feet to the north line of said Parcel 1, being also the south line of the SBCTA Rail Corridor, one hundred (100) feet wide, as shown on said Record of Survey 19-0109; Thence 2nd, along said north line of Parcel 1, N 87°55'05" E, a distance of 20.01 feet to its intersection with the northerly prolongation of the east line of said fifty (50) street easement dedication; Thence 3rd, along said prolongation, S 00°07'00" W, a distance of 60.04 feet to a point on said south line of Parcel 1, said point being the northeast corner of said fifty (50) street easement dedication; Thence 4th, along said south line, S 87°55'05" W, a distance of 20.01 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Containing 1,201 square feet, more or less. Notes · The above legal description is based on the dimensions, information, and land references shown on Record of Survey 19-0109 filed in Book 168, Pages 53 through 63 of Record of Surveys. · Bearings and distances are referenced to the California Coordinate System, Zone 5 grid, NAD83(2011) CSRS Epoch 2017.50. To obtain ground level distances, multiply grid distances by 1.000060364. This description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land Surveyors Act. __________________________________________ Justin P. Height, PLS 6167 Date Exhibit A-1 Resolution No. 2022-014 - Page 6 of 11 Page 358 Exhibit A Legal Description Etiwanda Grade Separation Project APN 229-291-55 Temporary Construction Easement Page 1 of 1 Pages That portion of Parcel 1, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, as described in the Certificate of Compliance No. 507 for Lot Line Adjustment, recorded January 17, 2002 as Document No. 20020026839 of Official Records, records of said County, described as follows: Commencing at the intersection of the westerly prolongation of the south line of said Parcel 1 with the centerline of Etiwanda Avenue, thirty (30) foot half-width, being also the northwest corner of the fifty (50) street easement dedication described in the Easement Deed recorded April 17, 1998 as Document No. 19980145780 of Official Records of said County, as both are shown on Sheet 8 of Record of Survey 19-0109 filed in Book 168, Pages 53 through 63 of Record of Surveys, records of said County; Thence, along said prolongation and said south line of Parcel 1, N 87°55'05" E, a distance of 50.03 to the northeast corner of said fifty (50) foot street easement dedication, said corner being the True Point of Beginning Thence 1', along the northerly prolongation of the east line of said fifty (50) foot street easement dedication, N 00°07'00" E, a distance of 31.64 feet; Thence 21d, leaving said northerly prolongation, S 89°52'07" E, a distance of 42.00 feet to a line parallel with, and lying 42.00 feet easterly of, said northerly prolongation; Thence 3NI, along said parallel line, S 00°07'00" W, a distance of 30.02 feet to said south line of Parcel 1; Thence 41h, along said south line, S 87°55'05" W, a distance of 42.03 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Containing 1,295 square feet, more or less. Notes ( ( The above legal description is based on the dimensions, information, and land references shown on Record of Survey 19-0109 filed in Book 168, Pages 53 through 63 of Record of Surveys. Bearings and distances are referenced to the California Coordinate System, Zone 5 grid, NAD83(2011) CSRS Epoch 2017.50. To obtain ground level distances, multiply grid distances by 1.000060364. This descripttr Act. b d by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land Surveyors Justin P. Height, LS 6167 Job No. 0818-00016 SCORE TCE.doct 10-07-2021 Date Exhibit A-2 ■:••••• GUIDA • • ••• :••••: SURVEYING INC. Exhibit A Legal Description Etiwanda Grade Separation Project APN 229-291-55 Temporary Construction Easement Page 1 of 1 Pages Job No. 0618-00016 BCORE TCE.docx 10-07-2021 That portion of Parcel 1, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, as described in the Certificate of Compliance No. 507 for Lot Line Adjustment, recorded January 17, 2002 as Document No. 20020026839 of Official Records, records of said County, described as follows: Commencing at the intersection of the westerly prolongation of the south line of said Parcel 1 with the centerline of Etiwanda Avenue, thirty (30) foot half-width, being also the northwest corner of the fifty (50) street easement dedication described in the Easement Deed recorded April 17, 1998 as Document No. 19980145780 of Official Records of said County, as both are shown on Sheet 8 of Record of Survey 19-0109 filed in Book 168, Pages 53 through 63 of Record of Surveys, records of said County; Thence, along said prolongation and said south line of Parcel 1, N 87°55'05" E, a distance of 50.03 to the northeast corner of said fifty (50) foot street easement dedication, said corner being the True Point of Beginning; Thence 1st, along the northerly prolongation of the east line of said fifty (50) foot street easement dedication, N 00°07'00" E, a distance of 31.64 feet; Thence 2nd, leaving said northerly prolongation, S 89°52'07" E, a distance of 42.00 feet to a line parallel with, and lying 42.00 feet easterly of, said northerly prolongation; Thence 3rd, along said parallel line, S 00°07'00" W, a distance of 30.02 feet to said south line of Parcel 1; Thence 4th, along said south line, S 87°55'05" W, a distance of 42.03 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Containing 1,295 square feet, more or less. Notes ·The above legal description is based on the dimensions, information, and land references shown on Record of Survey 19-0109 filed in Book 168, Pages 53 through 63 of Record of Surveys. ·Bearings and distances are referenced to the California Coordinate System, Zone 5 grid, NAD83(2011) CSRS Epoch 2017.50. To obtain ground level distances, multiply grid distances by 1.000060364. This description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land Surveyors Act. __________________________________________ Justin P. Height, PLS 6167 Date Exhibit A-2 Resolution No. 2022-014 - Page 7 of 11 Page 359 j-almtixa NOTES PLAT MAP IS BASED ON THE INFORMATION AND LAND REFERENCES SHOWN ON THE RECORD OF SURVEY 19-0109 FILED IN BOOK 168, PAGES 53 THROUGH 63 OF RECORD OF SURVEYS. BEARINGS AND DISTANCES ARE REFERENCED TO THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM, ZONE 5 GRID, NAD83(2011) CSRS EPOCH 2017.50. TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES, MULTIPLY GRID DISTANCES BY 1.000060364. SBCTA RAIL CORRIDOR ETIWANDA AVENUE c)1 PERMANENT ROAD EASEMENT 1,201 SQ. FT. (SEE PAGE 2) GUIDA SURVEYING INC. Job No. 0618-00016 BCORE.dwg PARCn J COC NO, 507/ 50R LLA DOC, NO, 20020026239 OF THIS PLAT HAS BEEN PREPARED BY ME, OR UNDER MY DI TION, IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE PR L LAND SURVEYORS ACT. 10-07-2021 JUSTIN P. HEIGHT, PLS 6167 DATE SCALE: 1"=300' Exhibit B Plat Map Etiwanda Grade Separation Project APN 229-291-55 Permanent Road Easement Page 1 of 2 Pages Exhibit B-1Resolution No. 2022-014 - Page 8 of 11 &nbsp;&nbsp;Page 360 w :::::> z w > <( <( 0 z <( 1-w GUIDA SURVEYING INC. Job No. 0618-00016 BCORE.dwg SBCTA RAIL CORRIDOR L3 X 50' SCALE: 1 "=20' COURSE TABLE L 1 N8T55'05"E 30.02' (TIE) L2 N00"07'00"E 60.04' L3 N8T55'05"E 20.01' L4 soo·o7•oo"w 60.04• LS S8T55'05"W 20.01' Exhibit B Plat Map Etiwanda Grade Separation Project APN 229-291-55 Permanent Road Easement Page 2 of 2 Pages Resolution No. 2022-014 - Page 9 of 11 Page 361 z-al!cRtpca NOTES PLAT MAP IS BASED ON THE INFORMATION AND LAND REFERENCES SHOWN ON THE RECORD OF SURVEY 19-0109 FILED IN BOOK 168, PAGES 53 THROUGH 63 OF RECORD OF SURVEYS. BEARINGS AND DISTANCES ARE REFERENCED TO THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM, ZONE 5 GRID, NAD83(2011) CSRS EPOCH 2017.50. TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES, MULTIPLY GRID DISTANCES BY 1.000060364. ETIWANDA AVENUE c)1 TEMP. CON ST. EASEMENT 1,295 SQ. FT. (SEE PAGE 2) GUIDA SURVEYING INC. Job No. 0618-00016 BCORE.dwg SBCTA RAIL CORRIDOR PARCn J COC NO, 507/ 50R LLA DOC, NO, 20020026239 OF THIS PLAT HAS BEEN PREPARED BY ME, OR UNDER MY DI TION, IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE PR L LAND SURVEYORS ACT. 10-07-2021 JUSTIN P. HEIGAT> PLS 6167 DATE SCALE: 1"=300' Exhibit B Plat Map Etiwanda Grade Separation Project APN 229-291-55 Temporary Construction Easement Page 1 of 2 Pages z-al!cRtpca NOTES PLAT MAP IS BASED ON THE INFORMATION AND LAND REFERENCES SHOWN ON THE RECORD OF SURVEY 19-0109 FILED IN BOOK 168, PAGES 53 THROUGH 63 OF RECORD OF SURVEYS. BEARINGS AND DISTANCES ARE REFERENCED TO THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM, ZONE 5 GRID, NAD83(2011) CSRS EPOCH 2017.50. TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES, MULTIPLY GRID DISTANCES BY 1.000060364. ETIWANDA AVENUE c)1 TEMP. CON ST. EASEMENT 1,295 SQ. FT. (SEE PAGE 2) GUIDA SURVEYING INC. Job No. 0618-00016 BCORE.dwg SBCTA RAIL CORRIDOR PARCn J COC NO, 507/ 50R LLA DOC, NO, 20020026239 OF THIS PLAT HAS BEEN PREPARED BY ME, OR UNDER MY DI TION, IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE PR L LAND SURVEYORS ACT. 10-07-2021 JUSTIN P. HEIGAT> PLS 6167 DATE SCALE: 1"=300' Exhibit B Plat Map Etiwanda Grade Separation Project APN 229-291-55 Temporary Construction Easement Page 1 of 2 Pages Exhibit B-2Resolution No. 2022-014 - Page 10 of 11 &nbsp;&nbsp;Page 362 SBCTA RAIL CORRIDOR oz U') Q 0::f- . 0 LL<( 0 OS:2 z o 0 (XJ u o::w w u r--­o OQ U')0... z O s:t 0:: w 0 U1 o:: 0 U<Cw<XJW 0... Ol• Ols: . f-z (/) I w :::::> z I w <( 30' I �r ___ _!:1__Q I E)_ cir! 0�0 \ v, <( �s� , ��S) , o <..{,<, r CJ </ \ , ---1 <0 0 z <( r:'\ , ,)o ,.J ,, 6 � \ ,-\ c0CJ 3: 161 < -I \C, I-w 50' COURSE TABLE L 1 N8T55'05"E 50.03' (TIE) L2 Noo·o7•oo"E 31.64' u s89·52'07"E 42.00·L4 S00-07'00"W 30.02'L5 S8T55'05"W 42.03' GUIDA SURVEYING INC. CDC DOC" X N _J Job No. 0618-00016 BCORE.dwg SCALE: 1 "=20' NORTH LINE �OF PARCEL 1 P J\RCE'.L J NO" 507 FOR LLA No" L3 L5 2002002b839 0 R X . ) X ) s:t _J -1sOUTHOF PA LINE RCEL 1 TEMPORAR y CONSTRUC TION EASEMENT 1,295 SQ. FT. TPOB N.E. CORNER OF 50' ST. EASE DEDICATION PER DOC NO. 19980145780 OR Exhibit B Plat Map Etiwanda Grade Separation Project APN 229-291-55 Temporary Construction Easement Page 2 of 2 Pages Resolution No. 2022-014 - Page 11 of 11 Page 363 Resolution No. 2022-015 - Page 1 of 19 RESOLUTION NO. 2022-015 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY INTERESTS NECESSARY FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES AND AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION THEREOF IN CONNECTION WITH THE ETIWANDA GRADE SEPARATION PROJECT (PERMANENT EASEMENT AND TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT OVER A PORTION OF APN 0229-291-22) WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga (“City”) is a municipal corporation in the County of San Bernardino, State of California; and WHEREAS, the City seeks to construct the Etiwanda Grade Separation Project (“Project”). The Project requires the acquisition of additional right of way for grade separation. The Project involves the widening and construction of Etiwanda Avenue as a four-lane grade separated roadway over the Southern California Regional Rail Authority (“SCRRA”)/Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railroad (“BNSF”) San Gabriel subdivision, currently a two-lane at-grade crossing. The Project will construct an overhead crossing, utilizing walls and embankments to support the raised approaching roadway. It will span the railroad right-of-way and provide access to adjacent properties. The Project will widen Etiwanda Avenue to four traffic lanes including a painted median/left turn lane with bike lanes and sidewalks on each side and a northbound right turn lane onto Whittram Avenue. When completed in 2024, the Project will reduce vehicle and truck delays, as well as queuing. It will improve mobility, safety, and level of service at the crossing, and it will provide for the safe transit of pedestrians, bicyclists, vehicles, trucks, and trains. Furthermore, the Project will provide for improved response times in the area for first responders such as police officers, firefighters, paramedics, and emergency medical technicians. All work is consistent with the City’s General Plan of Circulation. The Plans for the Project are on file with the Engineering Services Department and are incorporated herein by this reference; and WHEREAS, the environmental effects of the Project were studied and analyzed pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq., and the CEQA Guidelines, 14 Cal. Code Regs. Section 15000 et seq. (“CEQA Guidelines”). City Staff determined that the Project was statutorily exempt pursuant to CEQA Article 18. Statutory Exemptions, Section 15282. Other Statutory Exemptions, paragraph (g) as a railroad grade separation project which eliminates and existing grade crossing or reconstructs an existing grade separation. The City Council approved the Notice of Exemption and authorized Staff to file the Notice of Exemption with the Office of Planning and Research and the County clerk as specified in Section 21080.13(2) of the Public Resources Code. Said Notice of Exemption was filed with the Office of Planning and Research and with the County of San Bernardino on or about June 11, 2018 in accordance with the statutory requirements; and WHEREAS, in connection with the proposed Resolution of Necessity, on January 19, 2022, City Staff reviewed the environmental documentation prepared in connection with the Project. Pursuant to the criteria of Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines and Section 21166 of the Public Resources Code, City Staff concluded that no substantial changes have occurred in the Project, no substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the Project is undertaken, and that the City has obtained no new information of substantial importance that would require further environmental analysis. These environmental findings are the appropriate findings with respect to the proposed acquisition of the Subject Property Interests. ATTACHMENT 8Page364 Resolution No. 2022-015 - Page 2 of 19 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1. The Rancho Cucamonga City Council adopts Resolution No. 2022-015, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, Declaring Certain Real Property Interests Necessary for Public Purposes and Authorizing the Acquisition Thereof in Connection with the Etiwanda Grade Separation Project (permanent easement and a temporary construction easement on portions of APN 0229-291-22). SECTION 2. The City seeks to acquire by eminent domain the real property interest described below in Section 3 of this Resolution for public use, namely grade separation and related purposes, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto in connection with the Etiwanda Grade Separation Project pursuant to the authority conferred on the City of Rancho Cucamonga to acquire real property by eminent domain by Section 19 of Article 1 of the California Constitution, Government Code Sections 37350, 37350.5, 37351, 40401, and 40404, California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1230.010 et seq. (Eminent Domain Law), including but not limited to Sections 1240.010, 1240.020, 1240.110, 1240.120, 1240.150, 1240.510, 1240.610, 1240.650, and by other provisions of law. SECTION 3. The City seeks to acquire an approximate 52,464 square foot permanent easement and an approximate 1,972 square foot temporary construction easement with a term of 18 months over portions of the real property located at 8949 Etiwanda Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and further identified as San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Number 0229-291-22 in connection with the Project. The permanent easement and the temporary construction easement are collectively referred to herein as “Subject Property Interest,” and APN 0229-291-22 is referred to herein as “SCE Parcel.” The Subject Property Interest is described more particularly in Exhibit “A” and depicted on Exhibit “B”, which are attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. SECTION 4. The environmental effects of the acquisition of the Subject Property Interest were studied as an integral part of the environmental review for the Project. In connection with the proposed Resolution of Necessity, on January 19, 2022, City Staff reviewed the environmental documentation prepared in connection with the Project. Pursuant to the criteria of Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines and Section 21166 of the Public Resources Code, City staff concluded that no substantial changes have occurred in the Project, no substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the Project is undertaken, and that the City has obtained no new information of substantial importance that would require further environmental analysis. These environmental findings are the appropriate findings with respect to the proposed acquisition of the Subject Property Interest. SECTION 5. The Project, as planned and designed, is in the public interest and necessity and is needed to improve vehicle and rail safety, traffic mobility, and surface transportation, as more fully explained below: A.The Project requires the acquisition of additional right of way for grade separation. The Project involves the widening and construction of Etiwanda Avenue as a four- lane grade separated roadway over the SCRRA/BNSF San Gabriel subdivision, currently a two- lane at-grade crossing. The Project will construct an overhead crossing, utilizing walls and embankments to support the raised approaching roadway. It will span the railroad right-of-way and provide access to adjacent properties. The Project will widen Etiwanda Avenue to four traffic lanes including a painted median/left turn lane with bike lanes and sidewalks on each side and a Page 365 Resolution No. 2022-015 - Page 3 of 19 northbound right turn lane onto Whittram Avenue. When completed in 2024, the Project will reduce vehicle and truck delays, as well as queuing. It will improve mobility, safety, and level of service at the crossing, and it will provide for the safe transit of pedestrians, bicyclists, vehicles, trucks, and trains. Furthermore, the Project will provide for improved response times in the area for first responders such as police officers, firefighters, paramedics, and emergency medical technicians. All work is consistent with the City’s General Plan of Circulation. B. The Project will reduce vehicle and truck delays, improve safety and level of service at the crossing, and it will provide for the safe transit of pedestrians, bicyclists, vehicles, trucks, and trains. Additionally, the Project will provide for improved response times in the area for first responders such as police officers, firefighters, paramedics, and emergency medical technicians. Accordingly, the Project will benefit the residents and businesses of the City and the community as a whole. C. The Project, as planned and designed, is consistent with the Circulation Element of the General Plan, which designated Etiwanda Avenue as a four-lane major arterial road. Anticipating the future growth of the SCRRA/BNSF corridor, the City’s General Plan identified this area to be grade separated. The City seeks to acquire the Subject Property Interest for public use, namely grade separation and related purposes, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto in connection with the Project. The City seeks to construct the Project to improve mobility, safety, and level of service at the crossing. D. The Project was planned and located to minimize the impact on the adjacent properties. Because of its scope, the Project requires the acquisition of several permanent easements and temporary construction easements over portions of 10 larger parcels, as well as fee interests in two parcels owned by private property owners. The construction of the Project will require some business/residential relocations. The City will coordinate the construction with the owner of the Subject Property Interest to minimize the impact of the Project on the parcel. Based on the timing of the Project, it is necessary that the City consider the acquisition by eminent domain of the required Subject Property Interest. SECTION 6. A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 7260 et seq., the City of Rancho Cucamonga obtained a fair market value appraisal of the SCE Parcel, the approximate 52,464 square foot permanent easement and the approximate 1,972 square foot temporary construction easement with a term of 18 months the City seeks to acquire for public use public use, namely grade separation and related purposes, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto. B. The City set just compensation in accordance with the appraised fair market value, and extended a written offer on November 23, 2021 to Southern California Edison Company, the owner of record. The fair market value appraisal used a date of value of October 14, 2021. C. The City’s written offer included an informational pamphlet describing the eminent domain process and the record owner’s rights under the Eminent Domain Law. In accordance with Government Code Section 7267.2, the City’s written offer contained a written statement of, and summary of the basis for, the amount it established as just compensation. The offer set forth the date of value utilized by the appraiser and explained the appraiser’s opinion of the highest and best use of the larger parcel. It explained the applicable zoning designation of the larger parcel. The City’s offer also summarized the principal transactions relied on by the Page 366 Resolution No. 2022-015 - Page 4 of 19 appraiser to arrive at the appraiser’s opinion of value. In addition, the written offer explained the appraiser’s valuation analysis, including severance damages. It included the City’s comparable market data relied on by the appraiser. Further, the City offered, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1263.025, to pay the record owner the reasonable costs, up to $5,000.00, for an independent appraisal of the approximate 52,464 square foot permanent easement area and the approximate 1,972 square foot temporary construction easement area. SECTION 7. The City provided written notice to the owner of record, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1245.235 of the City Council’s intent to consider the adoption of a Resolution of Necessity for the acquisition of the Subject Property Interest by eminent domain. SECTION 8. The public use for which the City seeks to acquire the Subject Property Interest, namely grade separation and related purposes, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto, will not unreasonably interfere with or impair the continuance of the public use to which any easement holders may have appropriated the area (Code of Civil Procedure Section 1240.510). Further, the Project may require the relocation of several utilities to the new right-of- way area. The public use for which the City seeks to acquire the Subject Property Interest, namely grade separation and related purposes, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto, is a more necessary public use within the meaning of Code of Civil Procedure Section 1240.650 than the uses to which public utility easement holders have appropriated any utility easements located on or within the area of the Subject Property Interest that are affected by the Project. Accordingly, the City is authorized to acquire the Subject Property Interest pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Sections 1240.510, 1240.610, and 1240.650. SECTION 9. Based on the evidence presented at the hearing regarding the Project, including the Agenda Report and documents referenced therein and any oral and written testimony at the hearing, the City Council hereby finds and determines that: A. The public interest and necessity require the Project; B. The Project is planned and located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury; C. The Subject Property Interest described more particularly in Exhibit “A” and depicted on Exhibit “B” hereto, is necessary for the Project; and D. The City has made the offer required by Government Code Section 7267.2 to the record owner of the Subject Property Interest the City seeks to acquire. SECTION 10. The findings and declarations contained in this Resolution are based upon the record before the City Council, including the Agenda Report and all documents referenced therein, all of which are incorporated herein by this reference, and any testimony and/or comments submitted to the City by the record owner and or the owner’s representative(s). These documents include, but are not limited to the City of Rancho Cucamonga’s General Plan, the offer letter sent to the owner pursuant to Government Code Section 7267.2, the notice to the record owner pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1245.235 of the City’s intent to consider the adoption of the Resolution of Necessity, Grade Separation Plans for the Project, and the Notice of Exemption for the Project. SECTION 11. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby authorizes and directs the City Attorney’s Office to take all steps necessary to commence and prosecute legal Page 367 Resolution No. 2022-015 - Page 5 of 19 proceedings in a court of competent jurisdiction to acquire an approximate 52,464 square foot permanent easement and an approximate 1,972 square foot temporary construction easement with a term of 18 months for the Project. The Subject Property Interest is described more particularly on Exhibit “A” and depicted on Exhibit “B” hereto. SECTION 12. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby authorizes the City Manager to execute all necessary documents in connection with the eminent domain proceeding. SECTION 13. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 19th day of January, 2022. ________________________ L. Dennis Michael, Mayor City of Rancho Cucamonga ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk City of Rancho Cucamonga APPROVED AS TO FORM: Nicholas R. Ghirelli, City Attorney Richards, Watson & Gershon CERTIFICATION: I, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2022-015, was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on the 19th day of January, 2022, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ___________________________ Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk City of Rancho Cucamonga, California Page 368 EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION APN: 0229-291-22 SERIAL NO. PERMANENT ROAD EASEMENT THAT PORTION OF THE WEST ONE-HALF OF SECTION 16 IN TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 6 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF, SAID PORTION BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE CENTERLINE INTERSECTION OF ETIWANDA AVENUE AND NAPA STREET AS SHOWN ON RECORD OF SURVEY 19-0109, FILED IN BOOK 168, PAGES 53 THROUGH 63, OF RECORDS OF SURVEYS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE ALONG SAID CENTERLINE OF ETIWANDA AVENUE NORTH 00°17'46" EAST, 76.07 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID CENTERLINE OF ETIWANDA AVENUE SOUTH 89°42'14" EAST, 40.00 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION OF THE EASTERLY LINE AND THE GENERALLY NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF THE VARIABLE WIDTH ROAD EASEMENT GRANTED TO THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PER THE DOCUMENT RECORDED JANUARY 23, 1997 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 19970023100, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, SAID POINT BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE OF INSTRUMENT NO. 19970023100 NORTH 00°17'46" EAST, 620.58 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 16; THENCE LEAVING SAID EASTERLY LINE OF INSTRUMENT NO. 19970023100 AND ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF SECTION 16 NORTH 88°57'20" EAST, 10.00 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF SECTION 16 SOUTH 00°07'00" WEST, 32.29 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 193.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE TO SAID BEGINNING OF CURVE BEARS SOUTH 82°07'25" WEST; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 09°43'27" AN ARC LENGTH OF 32.76 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 17°36'02" EAST, 7.64 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 5.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY AND SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 27°43'31" AN ARC LENGTH OF 2.42 FEET; Page 1 of 3 Exhibit A-1 Page 1 of 3 EXHIBIT “A” LEGAL DESCRIPTION APN: 0229-291-22 SERIAL NO. ______ PERMANENT ROAD EASEMENT THAT PORTION OF THE WEST ONE-HALF OF SECTION 16 IN TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 6 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF, SAID PORTION BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE CENTERLINE INTERSECTION OF ETIWANDA AVENUE AND NAPA STREET AS SHOWN ON RECORD OF SURVEY 19-0109, FILED IN BOOK 168, PAGES 53 THROUGH 63, OF RECORDS OF SURVEYS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE ALONG SAID CENTERLINE OF ETIWANDA AVENUE NORTH 00°17'46" EAST, 76.07 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID CENTERLINE OF ETIWANDA AVENUE SOUTH 89°42'14" EAST, 40.00 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION OF THE EASTERLY LINE AND THE GENERALLY NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF THE VARIABLE WIDTH ROAD EASEMENT GRANTED TO THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PER THE DOCUMENT RECORDED JANUARY 23, 1997 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 19970023100, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, SAID POINT BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE OF INSTRUMENT NO. 19970023100 NORTH 00°17'46" EAST, 620.58 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 16; THENCE LEAVING SAID EASTERLY LINE OF INSTRUMENT NO. 19970023100 AND ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF SECTION 16 NORTH 88°57'20" EAST, 10.00 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF SECTION 16 SOUTH 00°07'00" WEST, 32.29 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 193.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE TO SAID BEGINNING OF CURVE BEARS SOUTH 82°07'25" WEST; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 09°43'27" AN ARC LENGTH OF 32.76 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 17°36'02" EAST, 7.64 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 5.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY AND SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 27°43'31" AN ARC LENGTH OF 2.42 FEET; Exhibit A-1 Resolution No. 2022-015 - Page 6 of 19 Page 369 SERIAL NO. THENCE NON-TANGENT TO SAID CURVE NORTH 75°52'32" EAST, 4.60 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 14°07'28" EAST, 55.75 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 75°52'32" WEST, 5.37 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 283.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE TO SAID BEGINNING OF CURVE BEARS NORTH 81°31'15" EAST; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 08°35'45" AN ARC LENGTH OF 42.46 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°07'00" WEST, 82.77 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 273.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY AND SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 29°49'09" AN ARC LENGTH OF 142.08 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 29°42'09" EAST, 181.81 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 77.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY AND SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 30°00'00" AN ARC LENGTH OF 40.32 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°17'51" WEST, 43.19 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 38.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY AND SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 71°56'07" AN ARC LENGTH OF 47.71 FEET TO THE CITY BOUNDARY LINE OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AS SHOWN ON SAID RECORD OF SURVEY 19-0109; THENCE NON-TANGENT TO SAID CURVE AND ALONG SAID CITY BOUNDARY LINE NORTH 89°46'08" WEST, 151.75 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION OF SAID GENERALLY NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF INSTRUMENT NO. 19970023100; THENCE LEAVING SAID CITY BOUNDARY LINE AND ALONG SAID GENERALLY NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF INSTRUMENT NO. 19970023100 NORTH 41°12'57" WEST, 57.41 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT IN SAID GENERALLY NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF INSTRUMENT NO. 19970023100; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID GENERALLY NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID INSTRUMENT NO. 19970023100 NORTH 89°42'14" WEST, 11.99 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Page 2 of 3 Page 2 of 3 SERIAL NO. ______ THENCE NON-TANGENT TO SAID CURVE NORTH 75°52'32" EAST, 4.60 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 14°07'28" EAST, 55.75 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 75°52'32" WEST, 5.37 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON -TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 283.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE TO SAID BEGINNING OF CURVE BEARS NORTH 81°31'15" EAST; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 08°35'45" AN ARC LENGTH OF 42.46 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°07'00" WEST, 82.77 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 273.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY AND SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 29°49'09" AN ARC LENGTH OF 142.08 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 29°42'09" EAST, 181.81 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 77.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY AND SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 30°00'00" AN ARC LENGTH OF 40.32 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°17'51" WEST, 43.19 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 38.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY AND SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 71°56'07" AN ARC LENGTH OF 47.71 FEET TO THE CITY BOUNDARY LINE OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AS SHOWN ON SAID RECORD OF SURVEY 19-0109; THENCE NON-TANGENT TO SAID CURVE AND ALONG SAID CITY BOUNDARY LINE NORTH 89°46'08" WEST, 151.75 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION OF SAID GENERALLY NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF INSTRUMENT NO. 19970023100; THENCE LEAVING SAID CITY BOUNDARY LINE AND ALONG SAID GENERALLY NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF INSTRUMENT NO. 19970023100 NORTH 41°12'57" WEST, 57.41 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT IN SAID GENERALLY NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF INSTRUMENT NO. 19970023100; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID GENERALLY NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID INSTRUMENT NO. 19970023100 NORTH 89°42'14" WEST, 11.99 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Resolution No. 2022-015 - Page 7 of 19 Page 370 SERIAL NO. CONTAINING A GRID AREA 52,464 SQUARE FEET OR 1.204 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES USED IN THE ABOVE DESCRIPTIONS ARE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983 (CCS83), ZONE 5 GRID, CSRS EPOCH 2017.50 (NAD83 2011), ALL DISTANCES SHOWN ARE GRID, TO OBTAIN GROUND DISTANCES DIVIDE BY 0.99993964. ALL FOUND MONUMENT DESCRIPTIONS AND BASIS OF BEARINGS ARE AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF. THIS DESCRIPTION IS NOT INTENDED FOR USE IN THE CONVEYANCE OF LAND IN VIOLATION OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN PREPARED BY ME, OR UNDER MY DIRECTION, IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR'S ACT. PRELIMINARY 7/7/21 TIMOTHY S. FETTIG P.L.S. 7542 DATE Page 3 of 3 Page 3 of 3 SERIAL NO. ______ CONTAINING A GRID AREA 52,464 SQUARE FEET OR 1.204 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES USED IN THE ABOVE DESCRIPTIONS ARE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983 (CCS83), ZONE 5 GRID, CSRS EPOCH 2017.50 (NAD83 2011), ALL DISTANCES SHOWN ARE GRID, TO OBTAIN GROUND DISTANCES DIVIDE BY 0.99993964. ALL FOUND MONUMENT DESCRIPTIONS AND BASIS OF BEARINGS ARE AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT “B” ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF. THIS DESCRIPTION IS NOT INTENDED FOR USE IN THE CONVEYANCE OF LAND IN VIOLATION OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN PREPARED BY ME, OR UNDER MY DIRECTION, IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR’S ACT. PRELIMINARY __________________________________________________ ________________________ TIMOTHY S. FETTIG P.L.S. 7542 DATE 7/7/21 Resolution No. 2022-015 - Page 8 of 19 Page 371 EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION APN: 0229-291-22 SERIAL NO. TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT THAT PORTION OF THE WEST ONE-HALF OF SECTION 16 IN TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 6 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF, SAID PORTION BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE CENTERLINE INTERSECTION OF ETIWANDA AVENUE AND NAPA STREET AS SHOWN ON RECORD OF SURVEY 19-0109, FILED IN BOOK 168, PAGES 53 THROUGH 63, OF RECORDS OF SURVEYS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE ALONG SAID CENTERLINE OF ETIWANDA AVENUE NORTH 00°17'46" EAST, 76.07 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID CENTERLINE OF ETIWANDA AVENUE SOUTH 89°42'14" EAST, 40.00 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION OF THE EASTERLY LINE AND THE GENERALLY NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF THE VARIABLE WIDTH ROAD EASEMENT GRANTED TO THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PER THE DOCUMENT RECORDED JANUARY 23, 1997 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 19970023100, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE OF INSTRUMENT NO. 19970023100 NORTH 00°17'46" EAST, 620.58 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 16; THENCE LEAVING SAID EASTERLY LINE OF INSTRUMENT NO. 19970023100 AND ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF SECTION 16 NORTH 88°57'20" EAST, 10.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF SECTION 16 SOUTH 00°07'00" WEST, 32.29 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 193.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE TO SAID BEGINNING OF CURVE BEARS SOUTH 82°07'25" WEST; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 09°43'27" AN ARC LENGTH OF 32.76 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 17°36'02" EAST, 7.64 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 5.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY AND SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 27°43'31" AN ARC LENGTH OF 2.42 FEET; Page 1 of 4 Exhibit A-2 Page 1 of 4 EXHIBIT “A” LEGAL DESCRIPTION APN: 0229-291-22 SERIAL NO. ______ TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT THAT PORTION OF THE WEST ONE-HALF OF SECTION 16 IN TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 6 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF, SAID PORTION BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE CENTERLINE INTERSECTION OF ETIWANDA AVENUE AND NAPA STREET AS SHOWN ON RECORD OF SURVEY 19-0109, FILED IN BOOK 168, PAGES 53 THROUGH 63, OF RECORDS OF SURVEYS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE ALONG SAID CENTERLINE OF ETIWANDA AVENUE NORTH 00°17'46" EAST, 76.07 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID CENTERLINE OF ETIWANDA AVENUE SOUTH 89°42'14" EAST, 40.00 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION OF THE EASTERLY LINE AND THE GENERALLY NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF THE VARIABLE WIDTH ROAD EASEMENT GRANTED TO THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PER THE DOCUMENT RECORDED JANUARY 23, 1997 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 19970023100, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE OF INSTRUMENT NO. 19970023100 NORTH 00°17'46" EAST, 620.58 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 16; THENCE LEAVING SAID EASTERLY LINE OF INSTRUMENT NO. 19970023100 AND ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF SECTION 16 NORTH 88°57'20" EAST, 10.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF SECTION 16 SOUTH 00°07'00" WEST, 32.29 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 193.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE TO SAID BEGINNING OF CURVE BEARS SOUTH 82°07'25" WEST; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 09°43'27" AN ARC LENGTH OF 32.76 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 17°36'02" EAST, 7.64 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 5.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY AND SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 27°43'31" AN ARC LENGTH OF 2.42 FEET; Exhibit A-2 Resolution No. 2022-015 - Page 9 of 19 Page 372 SERIAL NO. THENCE NON-TANGENT TO SAID CURVE NORTH 75°52'32" EAST, 4.60 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 14°07'28" EAST, 55.75 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 75°52'32" WEST, 5.37 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 283.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE TO SAID BEGINNING OF CURVE BEARS NORTH 81°31'15" EAST; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 08°35'45" AN ARC LENGTH OF 42.46 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°07'00" WEST, 82.77 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 273.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY AND SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 29°49'09" AN ARC LENGTH OF 142.08 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 29°42'09" EAST, 181.81 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 77.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY AND SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 30°00'00" AN ARC LENGTH OF 40.32 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°17'51" WEST, 43.19 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 38.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY AND SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 71°56'07" AN ARC LENGTH OF 47.71 FEET TO THE CITY BOUNDARY LINE OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AS SHOWN ON SAID RECORD OF SURVEY 19-0109; THENCE NON-TANGENT TO SAID CURVE AND ALONG SAID CITY BOUNDARY LINE SOUTH 89°46'08" EAST, 9.61 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID CITY BOUNDARY LINE NORTH 03°44'43" EAST, 0.18 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 36.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE TO SAID BEGINNING OF CURVE BEARS SOUTH 03°44'43" WEST; THENCE WESTERLY, NORTHWESTERLY, AND NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 86°33'08" AN ARC LENGTH OF 54.38 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00°17'51" EAST, 43.19 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 79.00 FEET; Page 2 of 4 SERIAL NO. ______ THENCE NON-TANGENT TO SAID CURVE NORTH 75°52'32" EAST, 4.60 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 14°07'28" EAST, 55.75 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 75°52'32" WEST, 5.37 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON -TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 283.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE TO SAID BEGINNING OF CURVE BEARS NORTH 81°31'15" EAST; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 08°35'45" AN ARC LENGTH OF 42.46 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°07'00" WEST, 82.77 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 273.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY AND SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 29°49'09" AN ARC LENGTH OF 142.08 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 29°42'09" EAST, 181.81 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 77.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY AND SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 30°00'00" AN ARC LENGTH OF 40.32 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°17'51" WEST, 43.19 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 38.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY AND SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 71°56'07" AN ARC LENGTH OF 47.71 FEET TO THE CITY BOUNDARY LINE OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AS SHOWN ON SAID RECORD OF SURVEY 19-0109; THENCE NON-TANGENT TO SAID CURVE AND ALONG SAID CITY BOUNDARY LINE SOUTH 89°46'08" EAST, 9.61 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID CITY BOUNDARY LINE NORTH 03°44'43" EAST, 0.18 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 36.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE TO SAID BEGINNING OF CURVE BEARS SOUTH 03°44'43" WEST; THENCE WESTERLY, NORTHWESTERLY, AND NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 86°33'08" AN ARC LENGTH OF 54.38 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00°17'51" EAST, 43.19 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 79.00 FEET; Page 2 of 4 Resolution No. 2022-015 - Page 10 of 19 Page 373 SERIAL NO. THENCE NORTHERLY AND NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 30°00'00" AN ARC LENGTH OF 41.36 FEET; THENCE NORTH 29°42'09" WEST, 181.81 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 271.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY AND NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 29°49'09" AN ARC LENGTH OF 141.04 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00°07'00" EAST, 82.77 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 285.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 08°13'53" AN ARC LENGTH OF 40.94 FEET; THENCE NON-TANGENT TO SAID CURVE NORTH 75°52'32" EAST, 14.32 FEET; THENCE NORTH 14°06'10" WEST, 59.75 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 75°52'32" WEST, 14.07 FEET; THENCE NORTH 17°36'02" WEST, 8.05 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 191.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 09°40'56" AN ARC LENGTH OF 32.28 FEET; THENCE NON-TANGENT TO SAID CURVE NORTH 00°07'00" EAST, 32.19 FEET TO SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF SECTION 16; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF SECTION 16 SOUTH 88°57'20" WEST, 2.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING A GRID AREA 1,972 SQUARE FEET OR 0.045 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES USED IN THE ABOVE DESCRIPTIONS ARE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983 (CCS83), ZONE 5 GRID, CSRS EPOCH 2017.50 (NAD83 2011), ALL DISTANCES SHOWN ARE GRID, TO OBTAIN GROUND DISTANCES DIVIDE BY 0.99993964. ALL FOUND MONUMENT DESCRIPTIONS AND BASIS OF BEARINGS ARE AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF. Page 3 of 4 SERIAL NO. ______ THENCE NORTHERLY AND NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 30°00'00" AN ARC LENGTH OF 41.36 FEET; THENCE NORTH 29°42'09" WEST, 181.81 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 271.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY AND NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 29°49'09" AN ARC LENGTH OF 141.04 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00°07'00" EAST, 82.77 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 285.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 08°13'53" AN ARC LENGTH OF 40.94 FEET; THENCE NON-TANGENT TO SAID CURVE NORTH 75°52'32" EAST, 14.32 FEET; THENCE NORTH 14°06'10" WEST, 59.75 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 75°52'32" WEST, 14.07 FEET; THENCE NORTH 17°36'02" WEST, 8.05 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 191.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 09°40'56" AN ARC LENGTH OF 32.28 FEET; THENCE NON-TANGENT TO SAID CURVE NORTH 00°07'00" EAST, 32.19 FEET TO SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF SECTION 16; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF SECTION 16 SOUTH 88°57'20" WEST, 2.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING A GRID AREA 1,972 SQUARE FEET OR 0.045 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES USED IN THE ABOVE DESCRIPTIONS ARE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983 (CCS83), ZONE 5 GRID, CSRS EPOCH 2017.50 (NAD83 2011), ALL DISTANCES SHOWN ARE GRID, TO OBTAIN GROUND DISTANCES DIVIDE BY 0.99993964. ALL FOUND MONUMENT DESCRIPTIONS AND BASIS OF BEARINGS ARE AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT “B” ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF. Page 3 of 4 Resolution No. 2022-015 - Page 11 of 19 Page 374 SERIAL NO. THIS DESCRIPTION IS NOT INTENDED FOR USE IN THE CONVEYANCE OF LAND IN VIOLATION OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN PREPARED BY ME, OR UNDER MY DIRECTION, IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR'S ACT. PRELIMINARY 7/7/21 TIMOTHY S. FETTIG P.L.S. 7542 DATE Page 4 of 4 Page 4 of 4 SERIAL NO. ______ THIS DESCRIPTION IS NOT INTENDED FOR USE IN THE CONVEYANCE OF LAND IN VIOLATION OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN PREPARED BY ME, OR UNDER MY DIRECTION, IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR’S ACT. PRELIMINARY __________________________________________________ ________________________ TIMOTHY S. FETTIG P.L.S. 7542 DATE 7/7/21 Resolution No. 2022-015 - Page 12 of 19 Page 375 j'a l!CRIPca P ACCOMPANY LAT TO LEGAL DESCRIP710N EXHIBIT "B" THAT PORTION OF THE WEST ONE—HALF OF SECTION 16 IN TOWNSHIP 1 BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT P.O.C. CENTERLINE INTERSECTION CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA — - - - — - - - COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO PORTION APN 0229-291-23 33' 0 100 FOUND MAG NAIL AND WASHER MARKED "LS 6932" PER R.S.B. 168/53-63, FLUSH IN ASPHALT SOUTH, RANGE 6 WEST, SAN OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE THEREOF. SEE SHEET 2 OF 3 FOR DETAIL 'B' SEE SHEET 3 OF 3 FOR BASIS OF BEARINGS, LEGEND, EASEMENT NOTES, SURVEYOR'S NOTE, DETAIL 'A, AND LINE AND CURVE TABLES lc) (BASIS OF BEARINGS) (N 0077'46" E R.S.B. 168/53-63) <1- ET I WANDA AVENUE N 0077'46" E 620.58' \' T.P.O.B. \\\ R/W LINE \PERM ANE,N \F4OAD EASEMENT (52>I-6\4 (1.204 AC.) 331 1 L10 C4 s W 18.21'44R—AD. — — C7-1. 0' POR. - 4f 33' I Z;Ic I . 200 SCALE IN FEET APN 0229-291-23 .40 9 R 1g2.08 S 44'40'27" W RAD. • R/W LINE \NN 8131'15"E\ 2866 O.R. 305 REC. 1 2/1 2/1 9 51 APN 0229-291-22 POR. SECTION 16 T.1.S., R.6W., S.B.M. 0 -EASTERLY LINE OF INST. Na 19970023100 O.R. RECORDED 1/23/1997 0- GENERALLY NOR7HEAS7ERLY LINE OF INST. Na 19970023100 O.R. RECORDED 1/23/1997 RAD. L9 PREPARED BY ME OR C3 ir) SEE DETAIL 'A' ON SHEET 2 L3 C1 L4 I L5 L S 82177'25" W L8 RAD H I NORTHERLY LINE—N-1 OF SEC770N 16 T.1S, R.6W., S.B.M. 00 0' I UNDER MY DIRECTION: PRELIMINARY 7/7/21 TIMOTHY S. FETTIG P.L.S. 7542 DATE (SHEET 1 OF 3) PROJECT NAME: _______ MS• ORDER NO.:____ NOT. NO.: ______ CITY: RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY: SAN BERNARDINO STATE: CA SURVEYED BY: N/A SCE F.B. REF.: ______ DATE: _______ DRAWN BY: DB MAP REF.: RECORD OF SURVEY 19-0109, R.S.B. 168/53-63 [El SOLTIMBIN CALEXIIINIA IHNISCH MEMNON INNINATIONAL• Comm, CHECKED BY: JH TRES: SERIAL NO.: ______ ALE NAME: ______ EXHIBIT "B"Exhibit B-1Resolution No. 2022-015 - Page 13of 19&nbsp;&nbsp;Page 376 EXHIBIT "B" THAT PORTION OF THE WEST ONE-HALF OF SECTION 16 IN TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 6 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO APN 0229-291-22 \ \ \ \ \ \ PERMANENT u) ROAD EASEMENT.44 -c ®— GENERALLY NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF INST. NO. 19970023100 O.R. RECORDED 1/23/1997 0 -NORTHERLY LINE OF INST. NO. 20010368167 O.R. RECORDED 8/14/2001 \ (5\2,4\64 s6.Ff.) (1.204 Ac.) \ CITY BOUNDARY \ \ \ \ \ \LIRE N 89'46'08" W 151.75' PORTION APN 0229-291-23 NAPA STREET DETAIL 'B' NO SCALE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA _ - COUNTY OF Z SAN BERNARDI --V BERNARD :- ---- ----, R/W LINE SEE SHEET 3 OF 3 FOR BASIS OF BEARINGS, LEGEND, EASEMENT NOTES, SURVEYOR'S NOTE, DETAIL 'A, AND LINE AND CURVE TABLES (SHEET 2 OF 3) PROJECT NAME: ___ M S • ORDER NO.: _ NOT. NO.: _ CITY: RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY: SAN BERNARDINO STATE: CA SURVEYED BY: N/A SCE F.B. REF.: _ _ DATE: _ _ DRAWN BY: DB MAP REF.: RECORD OF SURVEY 19-0109, R.S.B. 168/53-63 rrOUMBIN CALIFOINIA m IEDOS9 H CHECKED BY: JH TRES: SERIAL NO.: _ ALE NAME: _ _ EXHIBIT "B"Resolution No. 2022-015 - Page 14 of 19 &nbsp;&nbsp;Page 377 THAT PORTION OF THE BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, OF BASIS OF BEARINGS: EXHIBIT "B" WEST ONE-HALF OF SECTION 16 IN TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 6 WEST, SAN IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF. THE BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON THE CENTERLINE OF ETIWANDA A VENUE, BEING N 0077'46" E, AS SHOWN ON RECORD OF SURVEY 19-0109, FILED IN R.S.B. 168/53-63, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY. (XXXX) • APN CSRS INST. LS O.R. P.O.C. POR. RAD. REC. R.S.B. R/W TP.aB. SURVEYOR'S NOTE: THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983 (CCS83), ZONE 5 GRID, CSRS EPOCH 2017.50 (NAD83 2011). ALL DISTANCES SHOWN ARE GRID, TO OBTAIN GROUND DISTANCES DIVIDE BY 0.99993964. LEGEND INDICATES RECORD DATA PER RECORD OF SURVEY 19-0109, FILED IN BOOK 168, PAGES 53 THROUGH 63, OF RECORDS OF SURVEYS (R.S.B. 168/53-63) FOUND MONUMENT AS NOTED ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER CALIFORNIA SPATIAL REFERENCE SYSTEM CENTERLINE INSTRUMENT LAND SURVEYOR OFFICIAL RECORDS POINT OF COMMENCEMENT PORTION RADIAL RECORDED RECORD OF SURVEY BOOK RIGHT-OF-WAY TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING PERMANENT ROAD EASEMENT 52,508 SF, 1.205 AC PARENT PARCEL CITY BOUNDARY LINE CENTERLINE - — — - EASEMENT LINE CURVE TABLE NO. DELTA RADIUS LENGTH Cl 09'43'27" 193.00' 32.76' C2 2743'31" 5.00' 2.42' C3 0835'45" 283.00' 42.46' C4 30'00'00" 77.00' 40.32' C5 7156'07" 38.00' 4771' C2 Cl .40'2---7!-- L6 s 44, g AD • DETAIL 'A' NO SCALE L5 Li EASEMENT NOTES (D-40' HIDE EASEMENT FOR WATER PURPOSES GRANTED TO THE METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PER 1308/465. O.R., REC. 11/23/1938 0 -VARIABLE WIDTH EASEMENT FOR ROAD PURPOSES GRANTED TO KAISER STEEL CORPORATION PER 6390/303, O.R. REC. 5/13/1965 0 -VARIABLE WIDTH AND 10' WIDE EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND SEWER PURPOSES GRANTED TO DAM F. BOLGER, TRUSTEE, PER INST. NO. 94-334698, O.R., REC. 8/5/1994 LINE TABLE NO. BEARING LENGTH Ll N 0077'46" E 76.07' L2 S 89'4274" E 40.00' L3 N 8857'20" E 10.00' L4 S 0007'00" W 32.29' L5 S 1736'02' E Z64' L6 N 7552'32" E 4.60' L7 S 1407'28" E 55.75' L8 S 7552'32" W 5.37' L9 S 0007'00" W 82.77' L10 S 0077'51" W 43.19' L11 N 89'46'08" W 151.75' L12 N 4172'57" W 57.41' L13 N 89'42'14" W 11.99' (SHEET 3 OF 3) PROJECT NAME. M.S.: _ _ ORDER NO.: _ _ NOT. NO.: _ _ CITY: RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY: SAN BERNARDINO STATE: CA SURVEYED BY: N/A SCE F.B. REF • DATE: _ DRAWN BY: DB MAP REF.: RECORD OF SURVEY 19-0109, R.S.B. 168/53-63 MIN ID CAUFOINIA LI EDEI SON* JAMISON INTIRMUTONAL• Comm CHECKED BY: JH TRES. SERIAL NO.: _ FILE NAME: _ _ SURVEYOR'S NOTE:BASIS OF BEARINGS:EASEMENT NOTES LEGEND EXHIBIT "B"Resolution No. 2022-015 - Page 15 of 19 &nbsp;&nbsp;Page 378 Z'a l!CRqxa P ACCOMPANY LAT TO LEGAL DESCRIP710N EXHIBIT "B" THAT PORTION OF THE WEST ONE-HALF OF SECTION 16 IN TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 6 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF. SEE SHEET 2 OF 4 FOR DETAIL 'A' SEE SHEET 3 OF 4 FOR DETAIL 'B' SEE SHEET 4 OF 4 FOR BASIS OF BEARINGS, LEGEND, EASEMENT NOTES, SURVEYOR'S NOTE, AND LINE AND CURVE TABLES P.O.C. CENTERLINE INTERSECTION CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ----- COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO PORTION APN 0229-291-23 33' 0 100 11. (J 33' c\1 co 33' FOUND MAG NAIL AND WASHER MARKED "LS 6932" PER R.S.B. 168/53-63, FLUSH IN ASPHALT Ll 40' lc) (BASIS OF BEARINGS) (N 0077'46" E R.S.B. 168/53-63) Ir) ET I WANDA AVENUE N 0077'46" E 620.58' r RA LINE TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT (1,972 SQ.FT.) (0.045 AC.) POR. APN 0229-291-23 „p 33' / i¢ tz, (30 C-) . 200 SCALE IN FEET SEE DETAIL 'A' ON SHEET 2 2866 D.R. 305 REC. 12/12/1951 APN 0229-291-22 POR. SECTION 16 T.1.S., R.6W., S.B.M. 0 —EASTERLY LINE OF INST. NO. 19970023100 O.R. RECORDED 1/23/1997 0— GENERALLY NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF INST. NO. 19970023100 O.R. RECORDED 1/23/1997 NORTHERLY LINE— OF SEC770N 16 T.1S, R.6W., S.B.M. 00 o' PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION: PRELIMINARY 7/7/21 TIMOTHY S. FETTIG P.L.S. 7542 DATE T.P.O.B. NORTHERLY LINE OF SECTION 16 °a • Z vj 0 0 L.Li v) • 0 a_ H (SHEET 1 OF 4) PROJECT NAME: _______ M S • ORDER NO.: NOT. NO.: ______ CITY: RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY: SAN BERNARDINO STATE: CA SURVEYED BY: N/A SCE F.B. REF.: ______ DATE: _______ DRAWN BY: DB MAP REF.: RECORD OF SURVEY 19-0109, R.S.B. 168/53-63 [El 57 6710. CHECKED BY: JH TRES: SERIAL NO.: ______ ALE NAME: ______ EXHIBIT "B"Exhibit B-2Resolution No. 2022-015 - Page 16of 19&nbsp;&nbsp;Page 379 EXHIBIT "B" THAT PORTION OF THE WEST ONE-HALF OF SECTION 16 IN TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 6 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF. E77WANDA AVENUE S 82'07'25" W N 007746" E 620.58' [VW LINE - RAD.NAPA STREET TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT (1,972 SQ.FT.) (0.045 AC.) 3 •00' L..-142.08' R:,-2-11 2700' L=141.04' V 9" .4.9'0 2866 O.R. 305 0 REC. 12/12/1951 APN 0229-291-22 POR. SECTION 16 T.1.S., R.6W., S.B.M. 50 100 SCALE IN FEET LJ : POR. APN 0229-291-23 Il L10 C4 II , I# L13 C -4100 ' ‘D 7II c --.1. It 6) i t .. — — — \- S 03'44'43" W \ L12 RAD. 1 I SEE I 1 DETAIL 'B' i 1 ON SHEET .5 I I L8 L9 C3 L14 C8 N 81'53'07" E RAD. L15 N 8131'15" E 5 •A• 0 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT (1,972 SQ.FT.) (0.045 AC.) S 44'4027" W \ C2 L5 L6 \ L7 L.16 cr) L3 T.P.O.B. L4 L19 NORTHERLY LINE L20 OF SECTION 16 L _ - S 82'04'54" W L18 L17 RAD. NORTHERLY LINE-11 OF SECTION 16 T.1S, R.6W., S.B.M. 0 # .49'0 low :-11237:1°.:0 L=.141.04' ii01.`1111' low 2866 O.R. 305 REC. 1 2/1 2/1 9 51 APN 0229-291-22 POR. SECTION 16 T.1.S., R.6W., S.B.M. DETAIL 'A' SEE SHEET 3 OF 4 FOR DETAIL 'B' SEE SHEET 4 OF 4 FOR BASIS OF BEARINGS, LEGEND, EASEMENT NOTES, SURVEYOR'S NOTE, AND LINE AND CURVE TABLES (SHEET 2 OF 4) PROJECT NAME: M.S.: ORDER NO.: NOT. NO.: CITY: RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY: SAN BERNARDINO STATE: CA SURVEYED BY: N/A SCE F.B. REF.: DATE: DRAWN BY: DB MAP REF.: RECORD OF SURVEY 19-0109, R.S.B. 168/53-63 IIOUTHEIMI camera IED[ISON' As IDIOM IMI2NAITONAL• Olowir CHECKED BY: JH TRES: ______ SERIAL NO.: FILE NAME: EXHIBIT "B"Resolution No. 2022-015 - Page 17 of 19 &nbsp;&nbsp;Page 380 EXHIBIT "B" THAT PORTION OF THE WEST ONE-HALF OF SECTION 16 IN TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 6 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO APN 0229-291-22 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT [44 (1,972 SQ.FT.) -cc (0.045 AC.) /CITY BOUNDARY c.3\ LINE PORTION APN 0229-291-23 0— GENERALLY NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF INST. NO. 19970023100 O.R. RECORDED 1/23/1997 0— NORTHERLY LINE OF INST. NO. 20010368167 O.R. RECORDED 8/14/2001 NAPA STREET DETAIL 'B' NO SCALE L11 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF / SAN BERNARDINO„,/ VW LINE SEE SHEET 2 OF 4 FOR DETAIL 'A' SEE SHEET 4 OF 4 FOR BASIS OF BEARINGS, LEGEND, EASEMENT NOTES, SURVEYOR'S NOTE, DETAIL 'A', AND LINE AND CURVE TABLES (SHEET 3 OF 4) PROJECT NAME: M.S.: _ ORDER NO.: _ NOT. NO.: _ CITY: RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY: SAN BERNARDINO STATE: CA SURVEYED BY: N/A SCE F.B. REF.: _ _ DATE: _ _ DRAWN BY: DB MAP REF.: RECORD OF SURVEY 19-0109, R.S.B. 168/53-63 CHECKED BY: JH TRES. SERIAL NO.: _ _ FILE NAME: _ _ EXHIBIT "B"Resolution No. 2022-015 - Page 18 of 19&nbsp;&nbsp;Page 381 THAT PORTION OF THE BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, OF BASIS OF BEARINGS: EXHIBIT "B" WEST ONE-HALF OF SECTION 16 IN TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 6 WEST, SAN IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF. THE BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON THE CENTERLINE OF ETIWANDA AVENUE, BEING N 00'17'46" E, AS SHOWN ON RECORD OF SURVEY 19-0109, FILED IN R.S.B. 168/53-63, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY. (XXXX) • APN CSRS INST. LS O.R. P.O.C. POR. RAD. REC. R.S.B. R/W T.P.O.B. SURVEYOR'S NOTE: THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983 (CCS83), ZONE 5 GRID, CSRS EPOCH 2017.50 (NAD83 2011). ALL DISTANCES SHOWN ARE GRID, TO OBTAIN GROUND DISTANCES DIVIDE BY 0.99993964. LEGEND INDICATES RECORD DATA PER RECORD OF SURVEY 19-0109, FILED IN BOOK 168, PAGES 53 THROUGH 63, OF RECORDS OF SURVEYS (R.S.B. 168/53-63) FOUND MONUMENT AS NOTED ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER CALIFORNIA SPATIAL REFERENCE SYSTEM CENTERLINE INSTRUMENT LAND SURVEYOR OFFICIAL RECORDS POINT OF COMMENCEMENT PORTION RADIAL RECORDED RECORD OF SURVEY BOOK RIGHT-OF-WAY TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT 1,983 SF, 0.046 AC PARENT PARCEL CITY BOUNDARY LINE CENTERLINE - - - - EASEMENT LINE LINE TABLE NO. BEARING LENGTH Ll N 0077'46" E 76.07' L2 S 89'4274" E 40.00' L3 N 8857'20" E 10.00' L4 S 0007'00" W 32.29' L5 S 1736'02" E Z64' L6 N 7552'32" E 4.60' L7 S 14'07'28" E 55.75' L8 S 75'52'32" W 5.37' L9 S 0007'00" W 82.77' L10 S 0077'51" W 43.19' L11 S 89'46'08" E 9.61' L12 N 03'44'43" E 0.18' L13 N 007751" E 43.19' L14 N 0007'00" E 82.77' L15 N 7552'32" E 14.32' L16 N 14136'10" W 59.75' L17 S 7552'32" W 14.07' L18 N 1736'02" W 8.05' L19 N 0007'00" E 32.19' L20 S 8857'20" W 2.00' RAD. EASEMENT NOTES (D- 40' HIDE EASEMENT FOR WATER PURPOSES GRANTED TO THE METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PER 1308/465. O.R., REC. 11/23/1938 0 -VARIABLE WIDTH EASEMENT FOR ROAD PURPOSES GRANTED TO KAISER STEEL CORPORATION PER 6390/303, O.R. REC. 5/13/1965 0 -VARIABLE WIDTH AND 10' WIDE EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND SEWER PURPOSES GRANTED TO DAM F. BOLGER, TRUSTEE, PER INST. NO. 94-334698, O.R., REC. 8/5/1994 CURVE TABLE NO. DELTA RADIUS LENGTH Cl 09'43'27" 193.00' 32.76' C2 27'43'31" 5.00' 2.42' C3 0835'45" 283.00' 42.46' C4 30130'00" 7700' 4032' C5 7156'07" 38.00' 4771' C6 8633'08" 36.00' 54.38' C7 30130'00" 79.00' 41.36' C8 0873'53" 285.00' 4094' C9 09'40'56" 191.00' 32.28' (SHEET 4 OF 4) PROJECT NAME• M.S.: ORDER NOT. NO.: CITY: RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY: SAN BERNARDINO STATE: CA SURVEYED BY: N/A SCE F.B. REF • DATE: DRAWN BY: DB MAP REF.: RECORD OF SURVEY 19-0109, R.S.B. 168/53-63 PED[15711* CHECKED BY: JH TRES• SERIAL NO.: -_-FILE NAME: BASIS OF BEARINGS: LEGEND EXHIBIT "B" SURVEYOR'S NOTE:EASEMENT NOTES Resolution No. 2022-015 - Page 19 of 19 &nbsp;&nbsp;Page 382 Resolution No. 2022-016 - Page 1 of 14 RESOLUTION NO. 2022-016 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY INTERESTS NECESSARY FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES AND AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION THEREOF IN CONNECTION WITH THE ETIWANDA GRADE SEPARATION PROJECT (PERMANENT EASEMENT, MAINTENANCE AND CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT, AND TWO TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENTS OVER A PORTION OF APNs 0229-151-15 & 28, 0229-161-01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 19 & 20) WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga (“City”) is a municipal corporation in the County of San Bernardino, State of California; and WHEREAS, the City seeks to construct the Etiwanda Grade Separation Project (“Project”). The Project requires the acquisition of additional right of way for grade separation. The Project involves the widening and construction of Etiwanda Avenue as a four-lane grade separated roadway over the Southern California Regional Rail Authority (“SCRRA”)/Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railroad (“BNSF”) San Gabriel subdivision, currently a two-lane at-grade crossing. The Project will construct an overhead crossing, utilizing walls and embankments to support the raised approaching roadway. It will span the railroad right-of-way and provide access to adjacent properties. The Project will widen Etiwanda Avenue to four traffic lanes including a painted median/left turn lane with bike lanes and sidewalks on each side and a northbound right turn lane onto Whittram Avenue. When completed in 2024, the Project will reduce vehicle and truck delays, as well as queuing. It will improve mobility, safety, and level of service at the crossing, and it will provide for the safe transit of pedestrians, bicyclists, vehicles, trucks, and trains. Furthermore, the Project will provide for improved response times in the area for first responders such as police officers, firefighters, paramedics, and emergency medical technicians. All work is consistent with the City’s General Plan of Circulation. The Plans for the Project are on file with the Engineering Services Department and are incorporated herein by this reference; and WHEREAS, the environmental effects of the Project were studied and analyzed pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq., and the CEQA Guidelines, 14 Cal. Code Regs. Section 15000 et seq. (“CEQA Guidelines”). City Staff determined that the Project was statutorily exempt pursuant to CEQA Article 18. Statutory Exemptions, Section 15282. Other Statutory Exemptions, paragraph (g) as a railroad grade separation project which eliminates and existing grade crossing or reconstructs an existing grade separation. The City Council approved the Notice of Exemption and authorized Staff to file the Notice of Exemption with the Office of Planning and Research and the County clerk as specified in Section 21080.13(2) of the Public Resources Code. Said Notice of Exemption was filed with the Office of Planning and Research and with the County of San Bernardino on or about June 11, 2018 in accordance with the statutory requirements; and WHEREAS, in connection with the proposed Resolution of Necessity, on January 19, 2022, City Staff reviewed the environmental documentation prepared in connection with the Project. Pursuant to the criteria of Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines and Section 21166 of the Public Resources Code, City Staff concluded that no substantial changes have occurred in the Project, no substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the Project is undertaken, and that the City has obtained no new information of substantial importance that ATTACHMENT 9Page383 Resolution No. 2022-016 - Page 2 of 14 would require further environmental analysis. These environmental findings are the appropriate findings with respect to the proposed acquisition of the Subject Property Interests. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1. The Rancho Cucamonga City Council adopts Resolution No. 2022-016, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, Declaring Certain Real Property Interests Necessary for Public Purposes and Authorizing the Acquisition Thereof in Connection with the Etiwanda Grade Separation Project (permanent easement, maintenance and construction easement, and two temporary construction easements on portions of APNs 0229-151-15 & 28, 0229-161-01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 19 & 20). SECTION 2. The City seeks to acquire by eminent domain the real property interest described below in Section 3 of this Resolution for public use, namely grade separation and related purposes, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto in connection with the Etiwanda Grade Separation Project pursuant to the authority conferred on the City of Rancho Cucamonga to acquire real property by eminent domain by Section 19 of Article 1 of the California Constitution, Government Code Sections 37350, 37350.5, 37351, 40401, and 40404, California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1230.010 et seq. (Eminent Domain Law), including but not limited to Sections 1240.010, 1240.020, 1240.110, 1240.120, 1240.150, 1240.510, 1240.610, 1240.650, and by other provisions of law. SECTION 3. The City seeks to acquire an approximate 5,130 square foot permanent easement, an approximate 2,986 square foot maintenance and construction easement, and an approximate 3,192 square foot temporary construction easement and an approximate 677 square foot temporary construction easement, each with a term of 30 months, over portions of the real property located at 8685 to 8821 Etiwanda Avenue & 12928 to 12974 Whittram Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and further identified as San Bernardino County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 0229-151-15 & 28, 0229-161-01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 19 & 20 in connection with the Project. The permanent easement, maintenance and construction easement, and the two temporary construction easements are collectively referred to herein as “Subject Property Interest,” and APNs 0229-151-15 & 28, 0229-161-01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 19 & 20 are collectively referred to herein as “Colombero Parcel.” The Subject Property Interest is described more particularly in Exhibit “A” and depicted on Exhibit “B”, which are attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. SECTION 4. The environmental effects of the acquisition of the Subject Property Interest were studied as an integral part of the environmental review for the Project. In connection with the proposed Resolution of Necessity, on January 19, 2022, City Staff reviewed the environmental documentation prepared in connection with the Project. Pursuant to the criteria of Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines and Section 21166 of the Public Resources Code, City staff concluded that no substantial changes have occurred in the Project, no substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the Project is undertaken, and that the City has obtained no new information of substantial importance that would require further environmental analysis. These environmental findings are the appropriate findings with respect to the proposed acquisition of the Subject Property Interest. SECTION 5. The Project, as planned and designed, is in the public interest and necessity and is needed to improve vehicle and rail safety, traffic mobility, and surface transportation, as more fully explained below: Page 384 Resolution No. 2022-016 - Page 3 of 14 A. The Project requires the acquisition of additional right of way for grade separation. The Project involves the widening and construction of Etiwanda Avenue as a four- lane grade separated roadway over the SCRRA/BNSF San Gabriel subdivision, currently a two- lane at-grade crossing. The Project will construct an overhead crossing, utilizing walls and embankments to support the raised approaching roadway. It will span the railroad right-of-way and provide access to adjacent properties. The Project will widen Etiwanda Avenue to four traffic lanes including a painted median/left turn lane with bike lanes and sidewalks on each side and a northbound right turn lane onto Whittram Avenue. When completed in 2024, the Project will reduce vehicle and truck delays, as well as queuing. It will improve mobility, safety, and level of service at the crossing, and it will provide for the safe transit of pedestrians, bicyclists, vehicles, trucks, and trains. Furthermore, the Project will provide for improved response times in the area for first responders such as police officers, firefighters, paramedics, and emergency medical technicians. All work is consistent with the City’s General Plan of Circulation. B. The Project will reduce vehicle and truck delays, improve safety and level of service at the crossing, and it will provide for the safe transit of pedestrians, bicyclists, vehicles, trucks, and trains. Additionally, the Project will provide for improved response times in the area for first responders such as police officers, firefighters, paramedics, and emergency medical technicians. Accordingly, the Project will benefit the residents and businesses of the City and the community as a whole. C. The Project, as planned and designed, is consistent with the Circulation Element of the General Plan, which designated Etiwanda Avenue as a four-lane major arterial road. Anticipating the future growth of the SCRRA/BNSF corridor, the City’s General Plan identified this area to be grade separated. The City seeks to acquire the Subject Property Interest for public use, namely grade separation and related purposes, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto in connection with the Project. The City seeks to construct the Project to improve mobility, safety, and level of service at the crossing. D. The Project was planned and located to minimize the impact on the adjacent properties. Because of its scope, the Project requires the acquisition of several permanent easements and temporary construction easements over portions of 10 larger parcels, as well as fee interests in two parcels owned by private property owners. The construction of the Project will require some business/residential relocations. The City will coordinate the construction with the owner of the Subject Property Interest to minimize the impact of the Project on the parcel. Based on the timing of the Project, it is necessary that the City consider the acquisition by eminent domain of the required Subject Property Interest. SECTION 6. A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 7260 et seq., the City of Rancho Cucamonga obtained a fair market value appraisal of the Colombero Parcel, the approximate 5,130 square foot permanent easement, the approximate 2,986 square foot maintenance and construction easement, and the approximate 3,192 square foot and the approximate 677 square foot temporary construction easements, each with a term of 30 months, the City seeks to acquire for public use, namely grade separation and related purposes, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto. B. The City set just compensation in accordance with the appraised fair market value, and extended a written offer on November 23, 2021 to Colombero Family Limited Page 385 Resolution No. 2022-016 - Page 4 of 14 Partnership, the owner of record. The fair market value appraisal used a date of value of November 10, 2021. C. The City’s written offer included an informational pamphlet describing the eminent domain process and the record owner’s rights under the Eminent Domain Law. In accordance with Government Code Section 7267.2, the City’s written offer contained a written statement of, and summary of the basis for, the amount it established as just compensation. The offer set forth the date of value utilized by the appraiser and explained the appraiser’s opinion of the highest and best use of the larger parcel. It explained the applicable zoning designation of the larger parcel. The City’s offer also summarized the principal transactions relied on by the appraiser to arrive at the appraiser’s opinion of value. In addition, the written offer explained the appraiser’s valuation analysis, including severance damages. It included the City’s comparable market data relied on by the appraiser. Further, the City offered, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1263.025, to pay the record owner the reasonable costs, up to $5,000.00, for an independent appraisal of the approximate 5,130 square foot permanent easement area, the approximate 2,986 square foot maintenance and construction easement area, and the approximate 3,192 square foot and the approximate 677 square foot temporary construction easement areas. SECTION 7. The City provided written notice to the owner of record, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1245.235 of the City Council’s intent to consider the adoption of a Resolution of Necessity for the acquisition of the Subject Property Interest by eminent domain. SECTION 8. The public use for which the City seeks to acquire the Subject Property Interest, namely grade separation and related purposes, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto, will not unreasonably interfere with or impair the continuance of the public use to which any easement holders may have appropriated the area (Code of Civil Procedure Section 1240.510). Further, the Project may require the relocation of several utilities to the new right-of- way area. The public use for which the City seeks to acquire the Subject Property Interest, namely grade separation and related purposes, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto, is a more necessary public use within the meaning of Code of Civil Procedure Section 1240.650 than the uses to which public utility easement holders have appropriated any utility easements located on or within the area of the Subject Property Interest that are affected by the Project. Accordingly, the City is authorized to acquire the Subject Property Interest pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Sections 1240.510, 1240.610, and 1240.650. SECTION 9. Based on the evidence presented at the hearing regarding the Project, including the Agenda Report and documents referenced therein and any oral and written testimony at the hearing, the City Council hereby finds and determines that: A. The public interest and necessity require the Project; B. The Project is planned and located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury; C. The Subject Property Interest described more particularly in Exhibit “A” and depicted on Exhibit “B” hereto, is necessary for the Project; and D. The City has made the offer required by Government Code Section 7267.2 to the record owner of the Subject Property Interest the City seeks to acquire. Page 386 Resolution No. 2022-016 - Page 5 of 14 SECTION 10. The findings and declarations contained in this Resolution are based upon the record before the City Council, including the Agenda Report and all documents referenced therein, all of which are incorporated herein by this reference, and any testimony and/or comments submitted to the City by the record owner and or the owner’s representative(s). These documents include, but are not limited to the City of Rancho Cucamonga’s General Plan, the offer letter sent to the owner pursuant to Government Code Section 7267.2, the notice to the record owner pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1245.235 of the City’s intent to consider the adoption of the Resolution of Necessity, Grade Separation Plans for the Project, and the Notice of Exemption for the Project. SECTION 11. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby authorizes and directs the City Attorney’s Office to take all steps necessary to commence and prosecute legal proceedings in a court of competent jurisdiction to acquire an approximate 5,130 square foot permanent easement, an approximate 2,986 square foot maintenance and construction easement, and an approximate 3,192 square foot temporary construction easement and an approximate 677 square foot temporary construction easement, each with a term of 30 months, for the Project. The Subject Property Interest is described more particularly on Exhibit “A” and depicted on Exhibit “B” hereto. SECTION 12. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby authorizes the City Manager to execute all necessary documents in connection with the eminent domain proceeding. SECTION 13. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 19th day of January, 2022. ________________________ L. Dennis Michael, Mayor City of Rancho Cucamonga ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk City of Rancho Cucamonga APPROVED AS TO FORM: Nicholas R. Ghirelli, City Attorney Richards, Watson & Gershon Page 387 Resolution No. 2022-016 - Page 6 of 14 CERTIFICATION: I, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2022-016, was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on the 19th day of December, 2022, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ___________________________ Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk City of Rancho Cucamonga, California Page 388 Exhibit A Legal Description Etiwanda Grade Separation Project APN 229-161-01,02,03 / Colombero Permanent Road Easement Page 1 of 1 Pages A portion of the land, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, as described in the Grant Deed recorded September 23, 2005 as Document No. 2005-0711542 of Official Records, records of said County, being also a portion of Lot 436 of Tract No. 2102 "Fontana Arrow Route Tract" per plat recorded in Book 31, Pages 11 to 15 of Maps, records of said County, described as follows: Beginning at the southwest corner of said Lot 436, being the intersection of the north line of Whittram Avenue, thirty (30) foot half-width, with the east line of Etiwanda Avenue, thirty (30) foot half-width, as all are shown on Sheet 5 of the map filed in Book 168, Pages 53 through 63 of Record of Surveys, records of said County; Thence along the east line of Etiwanda Avenue, N 00107'00" E, a distance of 300.00 feet to the northwest corner of said Lot 436; Thence Vd, along the north line of said Lot 436, N 891139'33" E, a distance of 15.00 feet to a line parallel with, and lying 15.00 feet east of, said east line of Etiwanda Avenue; Thence VI, along said parallel line, S 00137'00" W, distance of 264.49 feet; Thence 4th, leaving said parallel line, S 45721'41" E, a distance of 49.79 feet to said north line of Whittram Avenue; Thence 5th, along said north line, S mons" W, a distance of 50.51 feet to the Point of Beginning. Containing 5,130 square feet, more or less. Notes ( The above legal description is based on the dimensions, information, and land references shown on Record of Survey 19-0109 filed in Book 168, Pages 53 through 63 of Record of Surveys. Bearings and distances are referenced to the California Coordinate System, Zone 5 grid, NAD83(2011) CSRS Epoch 2017.50. To obtain ground level distances, multiply grid distances by 1.000060364. This descript Surveyors Act. d by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land 10-04-2021 Justin P. Height, LS 6167 Date Job No. 0618-00016 Colombero PRE.doox Exhibit A-1 JUSTIN P. HEIGHT NO. 6167 •••••• GUIDAn • ••• Lim: SURVEYING INC. Exhibit A Legal Description Etiwanda Grade Separation Project APN 229-161-01,02,03 / Colombero Permanent Road Easement Page 1 of 1 Pages Job No. 0618-00016 Colombero PRE.docx 10-04-2021 A portion of the land, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, as described in the Grant Deed recorded September 23, 2005 as Document No. 2005-0711542 of Official Records, records of said County, being also a portion of Lot 436 of Tract No. 2102 “Fontana Arrow Route Tract” per plat recorded in Book 31, Pages 11 to 15 of Maps, records of said County, described as follows: Beginning at the southwest corner of said Lot 436, being the intersection of the north line of Whittram Avenue, thirty (30) foot half-width, with the east line of Etiwanda Avenue, thirty (30) foot half-width, as all are shown on Sheet 5 of the map filed in Book 168, Pages 53 through 63 of Record of Surveys, records of said County; Thence 1st, along the east line of Etiwanda Avenue, N 00°07’00” E, a distance of 300.00 feet to the northwest corner of said Lot 436; Thence 2nd, along the north line of said Lot 436, N 89°09’33” E, a distance of 15.00 feet to a line parallel with, and lying 15.00 feet east of, said east line of Etiwanda Avenue; Thence 3rd, along said parallel line, S 00°07’00” W, distance of 264.49 feet; Thence 4th, leaving said parallel line, S 45°21'41" E, a distance of 49.79 feet to said north line of Whittram Avenue; Thence 5th, along said north line, S 89°09’38” W, a distance of 50.51 feet to the Point of Beginning. Containing 5,130 square feet, more or less. Notes · The above legal description is based on the dimensions, information, and land references shown on Record of Survey 19-0109 filed in Book 168, Pages 53 through 63 of Record of Surveys. ·Bearings and distances are referenced to the California Coordinate System, Zone 5 grid, NAD83(2011) CSRS Epoch 2017.50. To obtain ground level distances, multiply grid distances by 1.000060364. This description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land Surveyors Act. __________________________________________ Justin P. Height, PLS 6167 Date Exhibit A-1 Resolution No. 2022-016 - Page 7 of 14 Page 389 Exhibit A Legal Description Etiwanda Grade Separation Project APN 229-161-01,02,03/Colombero Parcel A Construction and Permanent Maintenance Easement for Bridge Structure Those portions of Lot 436 of Tract No. 2102 "Fontana Arrow Route Tract" in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California per plat recorded in Book 31, Pages 11 to 15 of Maps, records of said County, described in the Grant Deed recorded September 23, 2005 as Instrument No. 2005-0711542, described as follows: Parcel A: Commencing at the northwest corner of said Lot 436, being a point on the east line of Etiwanda Avenue, thirty (30)foot half-width, as shown on Sheet 5 of Record of Survey 19-0109 filed in Book 168, Pages 53 through 63 of Record of Surveys, records of said County; Thence along the north line of said Lot 436, N 89°09'33" E, a distance of 15.00, to a point on a line parallel with, and lying 15.00 feet (measured at right angles) east of, said east line of Etiwanda Avenue, said point being the True Point of Beginning of Parcel A, Thence along said parallel line, S 00°07'00" W, distance of 264.49 feet; Thence leaving said parallel line, S 45°21'41" E, a distance of 49.80 feet to a point on the north line of Whittram Avenue, thirty (30)foot half-width, as shown on said Record of Survey; Thence along said north line, N 89°09'38" E, distance of 7.01 feet; Thence, N 45°21'41" W, a distance of 45.61 feet to a point on a line parallel with, and lying 25.00 feet (measured at right angles) east of, said east line of Etiwanda Avenue; Thence along last said parallel line, N 00°07'00" E, distance of 253.00 feet; Thence leaving last said parallel line, and perpendicular thereto, S 89°53'00" E, a distance of 6.00 feet to a point on a line parallel with, and lying 31.00 feet (measured at right angles) east of, said east line of Etiwanda Avenue; Thence along last said parallel line, N 00°07'00" E, distance of 14.58 feet to the north line of said Lot 436; Thence along said north line, S 89°09'33" W, a distance of 16.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Containing 2,986 square feet more or less Exhibit A-2 Exhibit A Legal Description Etiwanda Grade Separation Project APN 229-161-01,02,03/Colombero Parcel A Construction and Permanent Maintenance Easement for Bridge Structure Those portions of Lot 436 of Tract No. 2102 “Fontana Arrow Route Tract” in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California per plat recorded in Book 31, Pages 11 to 15 of Maps, records of said County, described in the Grant Deed recorded September 23, 2005 as Instrument No. 2005-0711542, described as follows: Parcel A: Commencing at the northwest corner of said Lot 436, being a point on the east line of Etiwanda Avenue, thirty (30) foot half-width, as shown on Sheet 5 of Record of Survey 19-0109 filed in Book 168, Pages 53 through 63 of Record of Surveys, records of said County; Thence along the north line of said Lot 436, N 89°09’33” E, a distance of 15.00, to a point on a line parallel with, and lying 15.00 feet (measured at right angles) east of, said east line of Etiwanda Avenue, said point being the True Point of Beginning of Parcel A, Thence along said parallel line, S 00°07’00” W, distance of 264.49 feet; Thence leaving said parallel line, S 45°21'41" E, a distance of 49.80 feet to a point on the north line of Whittram Avenue, thirty (30) foot half-width, as shown on said Record of Survey; Thence along said north line, N 89°09’38” E, distance of 7.01 feet; Thence, N 45°21’41” W, a distance of 45.61 feet to a point on a line parallel with, and lying 25.00 feet (measured at right angles) east of, said east line of Etiwanda Avenue; Thence along last said parallel line, N 00°07’00” E, distance of 253.00 feet; Thence leaving last said parallel line, and perpendicular thereto, S 89°53’00” E, a distance of 6.00 feet to a point on a line parallel with, and lying 31.00 feet (measured at right angles) east of, said east line of Etiwanda Avenue; Thence along last said parallel line, N 00°07’00” E, distance of 14.58 feet to the north line of said Lot 436; Thence along said north line, S 89°09’33” W, a distance of 16.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Containing 2,986 square feet more or less Exhibit A-2 Resolution No. 2022-016 - Page 8 of 14 Page 390 Exhibit A Legal Description Etiwanda Grade Separation Project APN 229-161-03,04,05,19/Colombero Parcel B Temporary Construction Easement Those portions of Lot 436 of Tract No. 2102 "Fontana Arrow Route Tract" in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California per plat recorded in Book 31, Pages 11 to 15 of Maps, records of said County, described in the Grant Deed recorded September 23, 2005 as Instrument No. 2005-0711542, described as follows: Parcel B Commencing at the northwest corner of said Lot 436, being a point on the east line of Etiwanda Avenue, thirty (30)foot half-width, as shown on Sheet 5 of Record of Survey 19-0109 filed in Book 168, Pages 53 through 63 of Record of Surveys, records of said County; Thence along the north line of said Lot 436, N 89°09'33" E, a distance of 15.00, to a point on a line parallel with, and lying 15.00 feet (measured at right angles) east of, said east line of Etiwanda Avenue; Thence along said parallel line, S 00°07'00" W, distance of 264.49 feet; Thence leaving said parallel line, S 45°21'41" E, a distance of 49.80 feet to a point on the north line of Whittram Avenue, thirty (30)foot half-width, as shown on said Record of Survey; Thence along said north line, N 89°09'38" E, distance of 7.01 feet; said point being the True Point of Beginning of Parcel B, Thence leaving said north line, N 45°21'41" W, distance of 14.03 feet to a point on a line parallel with and lying 10.00 feet (measured at right angles) north of said north line of Whittram Avenue; Thence, N 89°09'38" E, along last said parallel line distance of 138.46 feet; Thence, N 44°38'19" E, distance of 34.22 feet to a point on a line parallel with and distant 64.00 feet (measured at right angles) fron the centerline of Whittram Avenue, as shown on said Record of Survey; Thence, N 89°09'38" E, along last said parallel line distance of 63.00 feet; Thence, S 00°07'00" W, distance of 20.00 feet to a point on the north line of Whittram Avenue, forty-four (44)foot half-width as it now exists; Thence along last said north line, S 89°09'38" W, distance of 58.00 feet; Thence, S 00°07'00" W, distance of 10.00 feet to a point on the north line of Whittram Avenue, thirty (30)foot half-width, as shown on said Record of Survey; Thence along last said north line, S 89°09'38" W, distance of 157.46 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Containing 3,192 square feet more or less Exhibit A-3 Exhibit A Legal Description Etiwanda Grade Separation Project APN 229-161-03,04,05,19/Colombero Parcel B Temporary Construction Easement Those portions of Lot 436 of Tract No. 2102 “Fontana Arrow Route Tract” in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California per plat recorded in Book 31, Pages 11 to 15 of Maps, records of said County, described in the Grant Deed recorded September 23, 2005 as Instrument No. 2005-0711542, described as follows: Parcel B Commencing at the northwest corner of said Lot 436, being a point on the east line of Etiwanda Avenue, thirty (30) foot half-width, as shown on Sheet 5 of Record of Survey 19-0109 filed in Book 168, Pages 53 through 63 of Record of Surveys, records of said County; Thence along the north line of said Lot 436, N 89°09’33” E, a distance of 15.00, to a point on a line parallel with, and lying 15.00 feet (measured at right angles) east of, said east line of Etiwanda Avenue; Thence along said parallel line, S 00°07’00” W, distance of 264.49 feet; Thence leaving said parallel line, S 45°21'41" E, a distance of 49.80 feet to a point on the north line of Whittram Avenue, thirty (30) foot half-width, as shown on said Record of Survey; Thence along said north line, N 89°09’38” E, distance of 7.01 feet; said point being the True Point of Beginning of Parcel B, Thence leaving said north line, N 45°21’41” W, distance of 14.03 feet to a point on a line parallel with and lying 10.00 feet (measured at right angles) north of said north line of Whittram Avenue; Thence, N 89°09’38” E, along last said parallel line distance of 138.46 feet; Thence, N 44°38’19” E, distance of 34.22 feet to a point on a line parallel with and distant 64.00 feet (measured at right angles) fron the centerline of Whittram Avenue, as shown on said Record of Survey; Thence, N 89°09’38” E, along last said parallel line distance of 63.00 feet; Thence, S 00°07’00” W, distance of 20.00 feet to a point on the north line of Whittram Avenue, forty-four (44) foot half-width as it now exists; Thence along last said north line, S 89°09’38” W, distance of 58.00 feet; Thence, S 00°07’00” W, distance of 10.00 feet to a point on the north line of Whittram Avenue, thirty (30) foot half-width, as shown on said Record of Survey; Thence along last said north line, S 89°09’38” W, distance of 157.46 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Containing 3,192 square feet more or less Exhibit A-3 Resolution No. 2022-016 - Page 9 of 14Page391 Exhibit A Legal Description Etiwanda Grade Separation Project APN 229-151-15 / Colombero Temporary Construction Easement Page 1 of 1 Pages A portion of Lot 431 of Tract No. 2102 "Fontana Arrow Route Tract", in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, per plat recorded in Book 31, Pages 11 to 15 of Maps, records of said County, described as follows: Commencing at the southwest corner of said Lot 431, being a point on the east line of Etiwanda Avenue, thirty (30) foot half-width per said Tract 2102, as shown on Sheet 5 of Record of Survey 19-0109 filed in Book 168, Pages 53 through 63 of Record of Surveys, records of said County; Thence along the south line of said Lot 431, N 89109'33" E, a distance of 20.00 feet to a point on the west line of the ten (10) foot wide right of way vacated by City of Rancho Cucamonga Resolution No. 91-336 as described in the Resolution recorded December 12, 1991 as Document No. 91-469755 of Official Records of said County, said west line being parallel with, and lying 50.00 feet east of the centerline of Etiwanda Avenue, said point being the True Point of Beginning; Thence 1st, along said west line, N 00107'00" E, distance of 61.61 feet; Thence r d, leaving said west line, and perpendicular thereto, S 89.153'00" E, a distance of 11.00 feet to a line parallel with, and lying 11.00 feet east of said west line; Thence 3rd, along last said parallel line, S 00107'00" W, distance of 61.42 feet to the south line of said Lot 431; Thence 4th, along said south line, S 89109'33" W, a distance of 11.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Containing 677 square feet, more or less. Notes ( The above legal description is based on the dimensions, information, and land references shown on Record of Survey 19-0109 filed in Book 168, Pages 53 through 63 of Record of Surveys. ( Bearings and distances are referenced to the California Coordinate System, Zone 5 grid, NAD83(2011) CSRS Epoch 2017.50. To obtain ground level distances, multiply grid distances by 1.000060364. This descript n b Surveyors Act. repa d by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land 10-04-2021 Justin P. Height, LS 6167 Date Job No. 0618-00016 Colombero TCE.docx Exhibit A-4 GUIDA SURVEYING INC. Exhibit A Legal Description Etiwanda Grade Separation Project APN 229-151-15 / Colombero Temporary Construction Easement Page 1 of 1 Pages Job No. 0618-00016 Colombero TCE.docx 10-04-2021 A portion of Lot 431 of Tract No. 2102 “Fontana Arrow Route Tract”, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, per plat recorded in Book 31, Pages 11 to 15 of Maps, records of said County, described as follows: Commencing at the southwest corner of said Lot 431, being a point on the east line of Etiwanda Avenue, thirty (30) foot half-width per said Tract 2102, as shown on Sheet 5 of Record of Survey 19-0109 filed in Book 168, Pages 53 through 63 of Record of Surveys, records of said County; Thence along the south line of said Lot 431, N 89°09’33” E, a distance of 20.00 feet to a point on the west line of the ten (10) foot wide right of way vacated by City of Rancho Cucamonga Resolution No. 91-336 as described in the Resolution recorded December 12, 1991 as Document No. 91-469755 of Official Records of said County, said west line being parallel with, and lying 50.00 feet east of the centerline of Etiwanda Avenue, said point being the True Point of Beginning; Thence 1st, along said west line, N 00°07’00” E, distance of 61.61 feet; Thence 2nd, leaving said west line, and perpendicular thereto, S 89°53'00" E, a distance of 11.00 feet to a line parallel with, and lying 11.00 feet east of said west line; Thence 3rd, along last said parallel line, S 00°07’00” W, distance of 61.42 feet to the south line of said Lot 431; Thence 4th, along said south line, S 89°09’33” W, a distance of 11.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Containing 677 square feet, more or less. Notes · The above legal description is based on the dimensions, information, and land references shown on Record of Survey 19-0109 filed in Book 168, Pages 53 through 63 of Record of Surveys. · Bearings and distances are referenced to the California Coordinate System, Zone 5 grid, NAD83(2011) CSRS Epoch 2017.50. To obtain ground level distances, multiply grid distances by 1.000060364. This description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land Surveyors Act. __________________________________________ Justin P. Height, PLS 6167 Date Exhibit A-4 Resolution No. 2022-016 - Page 10 of 14 Page 392 j-almtpca NOTES NW CORNER OF LOT 436 ETIWANDA AVENUE P.O.B. SW CORNER OF LOT 436 50' 30' 30' NORTH LINE OF LOT 436 SCALE: 1"-100' 15' DOC NO., 2005-07/1 J 542 aR SOUTH LINE /OF LOT 436 [5] 0 GUIDA SURVEYING INC. WHITTRAM AVENUE THIS PLAT HAS BEEN PREPARED BY ME, OR UNDER MY DI TION, IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE PR L LAND SURVEYORS ACT. 10-04-2021 Job No. 0618-00016 Colombero TCE.dwg JUSTIN P. HEIG , PLS 6167 DATE PLAT MAP IS BASED ON THE INFORMATION AND LAND REFERENCES SHOWN ON RECORD OF SURVEY 19-0109 FILED IN BOOK 168, PAGES 53 THROUGH 63 OF RECORD OF SURVEYS. BEARINGS AND DISTANCES ARE REFERENCED TO THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM, ZONE 5 GRID, NAD83(2011) CSRS EPOCH 2017.50. TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES, MULTIPLY GRID DISTANCES BY 1.000060364. [1] NOO°07'00"E 300.00' [2] N89°09'33"E 15.00' [3] S00'07'00''W 264.49' [4] S45°21'41 "E 49.79' [5] S89'09'38''W 50.51' PERMANENT ROAD EASEMENT 5,130 SQ. FT. Exhibit B Plat Map Etiwanda Grade Separation Project APN 229-161-01,02,03 / Colombero Permanent Road Easement Page 1 of 1 Pages Exhibit B-1Resolution No. 2022-016 - Page 11 of 14 &nbsp;&nbsp;Page 393 a 50' I P.O.C. NW CORNER ,— OF LOT 436 I N89' 09' 33"E 15.00' 30' 4 15' 10' (4, Li > a a z a p w S45' 21' 41"E 49.80' T.P.O.B. (PARCEL A) S89' 09' 33"W 16.00' 00' 07' 00"E 14.58' S89' 53' 00"E 6.00' APN 229-161-01 PARCEL A NORTH UNE /OF LOT 436 NOTES: i S89' 09' 33"W PLAT MAP IS BASED ON THE INFOR ATION AND LAND REFERENCES SHOWN ON RECORD OF SURVEY 19-0109 FILED I BOOK 168, PAGES 53 THROUGH 63 OF RECORD OF SURVEYS. BEARINGS AND DISTANCES ARE REFERENCED TO THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE DSYSTEM, ZONE 5 GRID, NAD83(2011 CSRS EPOCH 2017.50. TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES, MULTIPLY GRID !STANCES BY 1 .000060364. APN 229-161-02 N89' 09' 38"E 7.01' LEGEND: v A 0 u) . 01 O z APN 229-161-03 N45' 21' 41"W 45.61' APN 229-161-04 0 In APN 229-161-19 MC. Ma 250547V W 542 On APN 229-161-05 Q,-WHITTRAM AVE. S89° 09' 38"W Construction and Permanent Maintenance — 2,986 SF Easement for Bridge Structure (Parcel A) 0 25 50 SCALE 1"=50' \.. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA EXHIBIT B. APN 229-161-01,02,03/Colombero Parcel A Construction and Permanent Maintenance Easement for Bridge Structure PAGE 1 OF 1 Exhibit B-2 Exhibit B-2 Resolution No. 2022-016 - Page 12 of 14 Page 394 a 50' I P.O.C. NW CORNER , OF LOT 436 "V I N89' 09' 33"E 15.00' I APN 229-161-01 30' 1 3 S45' 21' 41"E 49.80' NORTH UNE /OF LOT 436 NOTES: 1 S89' 09' 33"W PLAT MAP IS BASED ON THE INFOR ATION AND LAND REFERENCES SHOWN ON RECORD OF SURVEY 19-0109 FILED I BOOK 168, PAGES 53 THROUGH 63 OF RECORD OF SURVEYS. BEARINGS AND DISTANCES ARE REFERENCED TO THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE DSYSTEM, ZONE 5 GRID, NAD83(2011 CSRS EPOCH 2017.50. TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES, MULTIPLY GRID !STANCES BY 1 .000060364. APN 229-161-02 APN 229-161-03 APN 229-161-04 APN 229-161-19 MC. Ma 200547`11 W 542 On APN 229-161-05 N44' 38' 19-E 34.22' NE9' 09' 38"E 138.46' N45' 21' 41"W 14.03' N89' 09' 38"E 63.00' S89. 09' ,N/ 58 0' ,'%./ 0 /V /‘ N89' 09' 38"E 7.01' LEGEND: T.P.O.B n (PARCEL B) PARCEL B WHITTRAM AVE. S89° 09' 38"W SOO' 07' 00"1.% 20.00' SOO' 07' 00"W 14.00' Temporary Construction — 3,192 SF Easement (Parcel B) S89' 09' 38"W 157.46' 0 25 50 SCALE 1"=50' \.. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA EXHIBIT B APN 229-161-03,04,05,19/Colombero Parcel B Temporary Construction Easement PAGE 1 OF 1 Exhibit B-3 Exhibit B-3 Resolution No. 2022-016 - Page 13 of 14 Page 395 NOTES PLAT MAP IS BASED ON THE INFORMATION AND LAND REFERENCES SHOWN ON RECORD OF SURVEY FILED IN BOOK 168, PAGES 53 THROUGH 63 OF RECORD OF SURVEYS. 50' -- - ..--- 30' 30' DOC., NO., 2006-023227/2 FJH (POR710N CF LO7 431 7HAC7 2102) \N \SOUTH LINE \ OF LOT 431 I SEE DETAIL I / / T.P.O.B. P.O.C. SW CORNER OF LOT 431 LOT 436 -1'1Vi0-1' 2102 BEARINGS AND DISTANCES ARE REFERENCED TO THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM, ZONE 5 GRID, NAD83(2011) CSRS EPOCH 2017.50. TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES, MULTIPLY GRID DISTANCES BY 1.000060364. SCALE: 1”.—,100' 0 V) WHITTRAM AVENUE THIS PLAT HAS BEEN PREPARED BY ME, OR UNDER MY DI CTION, IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE PROFES 1, L LAND SURVEYORS ACT. 10-04-2021 JUSTIN P. HEIGIlT, PLS 6167 DATE MENNEN • MEN • IEEE • IEEE GUIDA N_JIMEN MENNEN SURVEYING INC. Job No. 0618-00016 Colombero TCE.dwg [A] COURSE TABLE [A] N89'09'33"E 20.00' [1] NO0'07'00"E 61.61' [2] S89°53'00"E 11.00' [3] SOO°07'00''W 61.42' [4] S89°09'33''W 11.00' WEST LINE OF 10' WIDE ROW VACATION PER DOC. NO. 91-469755 OR [2] 11' TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT — 677 SQ. FT. SOUTH LINE OF LOT 431 [4] P.O.C. SW CORNER OF LOT 431 DETAIL 1"=30' Exhibit B Plat Map Etiwanda Grade Separation Project APN 229-151-15 / Colombero Temporary Construction Easement Page 1 of 1 Pages Exhibit B-4 Exhibit B-4 Resolution No. 2022-016 - Page 14 of 14 Page 396 SCG/DP Etiwanda LLC 100 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 250, Santa Monica, CA 90401 • Tel: 323.981.8293 • www.dedeauxproperties.com VIA FED EX and EMAIL CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attn: Jason C. Welday, City Engineer; Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk Email: Jason.Welday@cityofrc.us Re: The City of Rancho Cucamonga’s Proposed Easement Including Certain Real Property Interests located at 8822 and 8768 Etiwanda Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, California Dear Mr. Welday: We write in response to your letter dated December 22, 2021, regarding the consideration being given to the exercise of eminent domain by the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the “City”) to create an 8,073 square foot temporary construction easement for a period of 18 months (the “Easement”) that would cover the real property located at 8822 and 8768 Etiwanda Avenue (the “Property”). We, SCG/DP Etiwanda, LLC, are the owner of the Property, and by way of this letter submit our objections to the Easement as presently envisioned and reserve our right to appear and be heard on the subject at the January 19, 2020 City Council meeting. The tenant of the Property is a trucking logistics company that handles a high-volume of trucking activity. The potential Easement appears to include one of the points of entry and exit from the street to the Property. Any full or partial loss of use of an entry point to the Property will severely impede tenant’s ability to accommodate the level of trucking activity required for its business operations. When this impediment is coupled with the protracted nature of the Easement (1.5 years), it presents a serious threat to tenant’s business and ability to continue to operate. In short, the Easement would create an undue and unnecessary hardship for tenant. The Easement would also interfere with and hinder our ability, as the Property owner, to realize the benefit of our investment. While we do not oppose the widening of Etiwanda, and understand why an easement may be needed, we ask that the Easement be revised so as to not unnecessarily burden the Property by ATTACHMENT 10Page397 SCG/DP Etiwanda LLC 100 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 250, Santa Monica, CA 90401 • Tel: 323.981.8293 • www.dedeauxproperties.com commandeering one of its points of egress and ingress. At this point, the inclusion of the Property’s entry and exit point is our only known objection to the proposed Easement. In addition, we note that no offer has been made by the City to SCG/DP Etiwanda, LLC, as required by Government Code Section 7267.2. Finally, please note that 8822 Etiwanda is subject to a Land Use Covenant between SCG/DP Etiwanda, LLC, as successor in interest to DP Etiwanda, LLC, and the Department of Toxic Substances Control dated August 19, 2020 (the “LUC”). Any easement that includes 8822 Etiwanda will need to abide by the LUC. We appreciate your consideration of the objections and issues concerning the Easement that are identified in this letter. Should you wish to discuss this matter prior to the January 19th hearing, please feel free to contact Ted Evans at tede@dedeauxproperties.com or via phone at 323-984-7731. Sincerely, Brett J. Dedeaux President / Managing Partner DEDEAUX PROPERTIES 100 Wilshire Blvd. Suite 250 Santa Monica, CA 90401 323.981.8294 brettd@dedeauxproperties.com www.dedeauxproperties.com Page 398 SCG/DP Etiwanda LLC 100 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 250, Santa Monica, CA 90401 • Tel: 323.981.8293 • www.dedeauxproperties.com cc: Page 399 Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP Attorneys at Law 1900 Main Street, 5th Floor | Irvine, CA 92614-7321 Telephone: 949.553.1313 | Facsimile: 949.553.8354 www.allenmatkins.com K. Erik Friess E-mail: rfriess@allenmatkins.com Direct Dial: 949.851.5478 File Number: 378028.00061/4891-8353-6136 Los Angeles | Orange County | San Diego | Century City | San Francisco Allen Matkins VIA EMAIL/FEDEX January 3, 2022 City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council Attn: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Email: Jason.Welday@cityofrc.us Re: 8996 Etiwanda Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, CA (APN 0229-283-79): Request to Be Heard at the City's January 19, 2022, Hearing on its Proposed Resolution of Necessity Dear Ms. Reynolds: This firm represents BTC III Etiwanda Commerce Center, LP, the owner of the property that is the subject of the City of Rancho Cucamonga’s December 22, 2021, notice of hearing regarding the City's intent to adopt a resolution of necessity authorizing partial condemnation of the property located at 8996 Etiwanda Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga (APN: 0229-283-79), for use in developing the Etiwanda Grade Separation Project. The City proposes to hold its hearing on the resolution of necessity on January 19, 2022. This letter constitutes BTC III's request to appear and be heard on the intended resolution of necessity. This letter also provides notice that BTC III intends to, and hereby does, object to the City’s adoption of the proposed resolution of necessity. BTC III reserves the right to submit additional comments and objections in advance of and at the January 19 hearing. Very truly yours, K. Erik Friess KEF:slp cc: Regina Danner, Esq. (rdanner@rwglaw.com) ATTACHMENT 11Page400 Douglas J. Dennington Direct Dial: (714) 641-3419 E-mail: ddennington@rutan.com January 12, 2022 Rutan & Tucker, LLP | 18575 Jamboree Road, 9th Floor Irvine, CA 92612 | 714-641-5100 | Fax 714-546-9035 Orange County | Palo Alto | San Francisco | www.rutan.com 2590/016092-0074 17336025.1 a01/12/22 VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL & U.S. MAIL Mr. Jason Welday Director of Engineering/City Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Dr. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 jason.welday@cityofrc.us Re: January 19, 2022 Hearing on Proposed Resolution of Necessity Dear Mr. Welday: This office has been retained by BCORE IE West Owner, LLC (“Client”) in connection with the attempt by the City of Rancho Cucamonga (“City”) to acquire portions of Client’s Etiwanda Avenue property for the Etiwanda Grade Separation Project (“Project”). We are in receipt of your December 22, 2021 letter purporting to provide notice of the City’s intent to adopt a Resolution of Necessity on January 19, 2022, in order to forcibly acquire our Client’s property by eminent domain. One of the findings the City must make in connection with its intended Resolution of Necessity is that the City had made an offer to my Client that complies with Government Code § 7267.2. While we recognize the City purported to make an offer to my Client in November 2021, that offer in no way complies with the dictates of Section 7267.2. Section 7267.2(a)(1) compels a government agency, prior to adopting a Resolution of Necessity, to “establish an amount that it believes to be just compensation” and to “make an offer to the owner or owners of record to acquire the property for the full amount so established.” The amount established by the agency “shall not be less than the public entity’s approved appraisal of the fair market value of the property.” (Ibid. [emph added].) Preliminarily, we are unaware of any City Council meeting at which the City “approved” any particular appraisal of my Client’s property, nor are we aware of any City Council meeting at which the City “established” the amount of just compensation for the City’s intended taking of my Client’s property.1 As you know, my Client’s property is fully improved with a large industrial 1 If we are incorrect in understanding, please let us know the date on which the City Council approved the appraisal and established it as the “just compensation” amount, and provide any agenda, agenda package and staff report for that particular decision. You may treat this as a request ATTACHMENT 12 Page 401 Mr. Jason Welday January 12, 2022 Page 2 2590/016092-0074 17336025.1 a01/12/22 complex. The purported “appraisal summary” that accompanied the City’s November 2021 offer was based on a number of “land sales” that may theoretically shed some light on the value of the portion taken,2 but have no bearing on any severance damages to which my Client is entitled. Indeed, despite the fact that the Project is intended to take years to complete (next to and on the Client’s property), the City’s appraiser has not developed any opinion on the amount of severance damages to Client’s remainder parcel (which is improved). The land sales identified by the City’s appraiser simply do not speak to the value of my Client’s fully-improved larger parcel or the diminution in value to Client’s improved remainder parcel. It is therefore not surprising that the City’s appraiser failed to comply with the requirements set forth in Section 7267.2(b)(3), that any damages to an owner’s remaining property to be “separately stated” and accompanied by a “narrative statement” explaining the severance damage conclusion. The summary statement accompanying the City’s October 2021 offer merely concluded that there were “$0.00” severance damages, without any narrative explanation or any quantitative calculation using sales of improved properties. The appraisal summary actually states that the “narrative” explanation for no severance damages was “not applicable.” How a multi-year grade separation project next to an improved and operating industrial complex will not result in a diminution in value to my Client’s remainder parcel remains a mystery. Nevertheless, the requirements under Government Code § 7267.2(b)(3) are mandatory in every government acquisition, particularly “part take” situations as in this case, and the City is required, at minimum, to provide a narrative explanation of the bases on which the City’s appraiser relied to determine there would be no severance damages to my Client’s remainder parcel. In addition, the City also failed to provide sufficient information concerning even the land sales the City’s appraiser relied on to determine the “fair market value” of the part of my Client’s property the City intends to take. It would appear, however, that the City’s appraiser utilized sales of unentitled land to value my Client’s property which is fully entitled and vested. The land sales also date back to more than a year ago, with the exception of Land Sale 1 which transacted in March of 2021. As we all know, property values have increased dramatically over the past two years and are currently at an all-time high. We have independently researched comparable properties in the area which are selling for as high as $100/sf—over 3 times the per square foot value the City’s appraiser states my Client’s land is worth. While we understand that the January 19th hearing is not intended to address disputes regarding valuation, as your December 22nd letter states, one of the findings the City Council will under the California Public Records Act. 2 By this, we in no way agree with the City’s appraisal conclusion of $27 per square foot. The recent sales of similar properties in the area last year are in excess of $100 per square foot, including a property Client recently purchased for on the order of $106 per square foot. The point is that no land sale could ever be used as a metric to assess the depreciation in value to Client’s improved remainder parcel. Page 402 Mr. Jason Welday January 12, 2022 Page 3 2590/016092-0074 17336025.1 a01/12/22 be asked to make is whether an offer has been made to my Client that complies with Government Code § 7267.2. The City’s October 2021 offer does not come close to such compliance. Accordingly, my Client objects to the proposed Resolution of Necessity in its entirety. We trust that you will transmit copies of this letter to the individual City Council members. Please also transmit to the City Clerk in order that this letter goes into the administrative record for this matter. Thank you. Sincerely, RUTAN & TUCKER, LLP Douglas J. Dennington DJD:pj Page 403 60178847.v1 December 29, 2021 City of Rancho Cucamonga Jason C. Welday Attn: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk City Engineer 10500 Civic Center Drive 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Jason.welday@cityofrc.us Re: City of Rancho Cucamonga’s (“City”) January 19, 2022, Resolution of Necessity (RON) Hearing: Objections to City’s Adoption of the RON Dear City Council: This firm represents Southern California Edison Company (“Edison”), owner of the property located at 8949 Etiwanda Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, California, bearing Assessor Parcel Number 0229- 291-22 (“Property”). This responds to the City’s notice of intent to adopt a resolution of necessity (RON), which if adopted would authorize the condemnation of portions of Edison’s Property for the City’s Etiwanda Grade Separation Project (“Project”). Edison objects to the City’s adoption of the RON and requests this letter be made a part of the record. Background By way of background, the Property contains Edison’s electrical infrastructure, and is also currently utilized by Edison as a laydown yard which is critical to support several of Edison’s ongoing and future electric transmission projects. Edison has been working collaboratively with the City to address the needs of the City’s Project and its impacts to Edison’s Property. However, Edison needs additional time to assess the impacts of the Project, work with the City on a relocation solution of Edison’s laydown yard, and assess appropriate compensation. Further, any acquisition of Edison’s Property would be subject to approval by the California Public Utilities Commission, which necessitates additional time. As such, Edison requests that this RON hearing be postponed to allow Edison and the City to continue working together to satisfy the Project needs, while minimizing impacts to Edison’s Property. Objections If the City proceeds with the RON hearing, Edison objects the City’s adoption of the RON, on the following grounds: ATTORNEYS AT LAW 18101 Von Karman Avenue Suite 1800 Irvine, CA 92612 T 949.833.7800 F 949.833.7878 Bradford B. Kuhn D 949.477.7651 bkuhn@nossaman.com VIA FEDEX AND EMAIL ATTACHMENT 13Page404 December 29, 2021 Page 2 60178847.v1 1. The Project Conflicts with an Existing Public Use. The Property contains an existing public use – a variety of electrical infrastructure both above and below ground, and it is also currently utilized as a laydown yard to ensure Edison can continue upgrading its electric infrastructure. Edison uses this infrastructure to serve its millions of customers, including the City itself, as well as individual customers, businesses, and other governmental and private entities. The assets are necessary to maintain a reliable supply of electricity in Southern California and are critical for the construction of Edison’s transmission line projects. The City has failed to establish the Project as either a more necessary public use or a compatible public use under Code of Civil Procedure section 1240.610 and section 1240.510. The City has not established that its proposed use is a more necessary use or established that its proposed use does not unreasonably interfere with or impair the continuance of the public use as it now exists or may reasonably be expected to exist in the future. 2. The Project Is Not Planned or Located in the Manner That Will Be Most Compatible With the Greatest Public Good and the Least Private Injury. A public agency may not exercise the power of eminent domain for a proposed project unless it establishes that “the project is planned or located in a manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 1240.030, subd. (b).) Because the City has failed to thoroughly analyze and compare whether the Project impacts could be lessened in alternative locations, the City cannot make this requisite finding. As just one example, the Property currently contains electrical utility infrastructure, which serves the public good. The City has not prepared a relocation plan, provided a Notice of Eligibility of Relocation Benefits as required by law, nor has the City analyzed the impacts of displacing or disrupting Edison’s laydown yard. Edison has proposed a number of alternative designs which would eliminate or minimize impacts to Edison’s Property, but the City has brushed those off because it would apparently take too much time to assess an alternative design. As such, the Project is not planned or located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury. 3. The City has Failed to Negotiate in Good Faith. A public agency is required to make an offer to the property owner for the full amount of just compensation, and thereafter engage in good faith negotiations. (Gov. Code, §§ 7267.1, 7267.2.) California Code of Regulations, Title 25, section 6182, subdivision (i)(1) states: Prior to commencement of an eminent domain proceeding the public entity shall make reasonable efforts to discuss with the owner its offer to purchase the owner’s real property. The owner shall be given a reasonable opportunity to present material which he believes to be relevant as to the question of value and to suggest modification in the proposed terms and conditions of the purchase, and the public entity shall carefully consider the owner’s presentation. Page 405 December 29, 2021 Page 3 60178847.v1 Subdivision (i)(1) states that if the evidence suggests a modification in the price, “an appropriate price adjustment shall be made and the new amount determined to be just compensation shall be promptly offered in writing to the owner.” As one court explained: “Government Code section 7267.1 imposes an affirmative obligation on a public entity seeking to condemn property to acquire that property by negotiation.” (Johnston v. Sonoma County Agricultural Preservation and Open Space Dist. (2002) 100 Cal.App.4th 973, 988.) Recently enacted changes to the Eminent Domain law make even more clear the need for a negotiation period between the time of the condemning agency’s offer and the passage of a resolution of necessity. Under the law, the City was required to offer Edison $5,000 to obtain an independent appraisal in order to evaluate the City’s offer. While the City’s “offer” contains language concerning such an opportunity, the language is rendered meaningless by the fact that the City made an offer of compensation on November 23, 2021, and thereafter rushed to proceed with this RON hearing by providing notice of the RON hearing on December 22, 2021. This is amplified by the fact that Edison has been working in good faith with the City to negotiate an acquisition to satisfy the City’s Project and minimize impacts to its own Property since it received the City’s offer, only to be notified of the RON hearing less than 30 days later. This clearly violates California law. Moreover, the City’s offer is inadequate in that it does not fully address all of Edison’s Property; there is an additional portion of Edison’s Property that is apparently required for the Project, yet the City has not even made Edison an offer for that acquisition. Conclusion For the reasons set forth in this letter, the City Council members should not adopt the proposed resolution of necessity. Edison therefore requests that the Board members not proceed with the hearing on that resolution or, if the Board does proceed, vote to reject said resolution and allow Edison and the City sufficient time to address these issues. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. Regards, Bradford B. Kuhn Nossaman LLP Page 406 lo - ^ O Q^O\ 1/lC.l-^ Q C^LA(j>. ^Qi^ictlO Cn(jM'in OLAq q_ Cii ( J^Ti/Ye^ j (^iy\j CL. . lieu i^old^ Oti Cl^ n h/ ^\oe.●*v sn^o RECEIVED N^OTicE of ^idf\^UJQ JAN 13 'ail CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGAyyy\<xc(s^\'^^ '\A V 'V 1 M <'Cn l/UAetiMLUl {iit Uc ivoiLt^ -to a Q JTl -3 ■TO I '~H^eu.Q Cc( Cii.) ^u2ia_ ’AA ^ e I (A OlA. uech0 ujae f ^L P Ol j l^l J■o 2-X'. Cu {j\n^DiAjQ I f/l W ^ oi(^q u. )■ fe ucl^ hj<U Oy\La^ . ’ /\ H ^ ^ tl 1/19/2022 CCM - Additional Material - Item F4 Etiwanda Grade Separation Project Public Hearing Resolutions of Necessity Public Need –Project Description Project Limits Public Need –Existing Conditions Public Need –Existing Conditions Public Need Proposed Improvements Bridge Overcrossing Access Roads Public Need Proposed Improvements Project will include: •Widening of Etiwanda Avenue to 4 lanes •Grade separated railroad crossing •Use of walls, embankments, and bridges •Bicycle and pedestrian improvements •Traffic signals •Utility relocations Public Need Proposed Improvements The project will result in: •Reduced vehicle and truck delays and queuing. •Improved level of service. •Improved safety for bicyclists, vehicles, trucks, and trains. •Improved response time for police, fire, paramedics, and emergency medical technicians. Right-of-Way Needs/Offers KularLightningPMSCG of DP Etiwanda JonesGoodman BTC III BCORE IE SCE Colombero Right-of-Way Needs/Offers Kular Truck Line Parcel: Fee Simple Interest is Needed for the Project. Whittram Avenue Etiwanda Avenue Right-of-Way Needs/Offers Lightning PM Parcel: 2,655 SF Temporary Construction Easement is Needed for the Project. Etiwanda Avenue Right-of-Way Needs/Offers SCG of DP Etiwanda Parcel: 8,073 SF Temporary Construction Easement is Needed for the Project. Etiwanda Avenue Right-of-Way Needs/Offers Jones, Garness & Clemons Parcel: 5,011 SF Temporary Construction Easement is Needed for the Project.Etiwanda Avenue Right-of-Way Needs/Offers Goodman Parcel (TCE1): 1,254 SF Temporary Construction Easement is Needed for the Project.Etiwanda AvenueGoodman Parcel (TCE2): 4,024 SF Temporary Construction Easement is Needed for the Project. Right-of-Way Needs/Offers BTC III Parcel (PRE1): 401 SF Permanent Roadway Easement is Needed for the Project. Etiwanda Avenue BTC III Parcel (PRE2): 14,801 SF Permanent Roadway Easement is Needed for the Project. BTC III Parcel (TCE): 7,936 SF Temporary Construction Easement is Needed for the Project. Right-of-Way Needs/Offers BCORE IE Parcel (PRE): 1,201 SF Permanent Roadway Easement is Needed for the Project. Etiwanda Avenue BCORE IE Parcel (TCE): 1,295 SF Permanent Roadway Easement is Needed for the Project. Right-of-Way Needs/Offers SCE Parcel (PRE): 52,464 SF Permanent Roadway Easement is Needed for the Project. Etiwanda Avenue SCE Parcel (TCE): 1,972 SF Permanent Roadway Easement is Needed for the Project.Napa Avenue Right-of-Way Needs/Offers Colombero Parcel (PRE): 5,130 SF Permanent Roadway Easement is Needed for the Project. Etiwanda Avenue Colombero Parcel (CME): 2,986 SF Construction and Maintenance Easement is Needed for the Project.WhittramAvenueColombero Parcel (TCE-B): 3,192 SF Temporary Construction Easement is Needed for the Project. Colombero Parcel (TCE): 677 SF Temporary Construction Easement is Needed for the Project. Necessary Findings A.The public interest and necessity require the project. B.The proposed project is planned and located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and least private injury. C.The subject property interests described in each Resolution of Necessity are necessary for the proposed project. D.The City has made an offer as required by Government Code Section 7267.2 to each of the owners of record of the real property it seeks to acquire. DATE:January 19, 2022 TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY:Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services SUBJECT:8:00 PM Time Certain: Public Hearing #3 - Consideration of City Council District Boundaries, to Include Review of the Demographer’s Preliminary Analysis; Review of the Public Mapping Tool and Inviting the Community to Submit Maps; Review of Staff’s Presentation of Maps Prepared Using the Discussed Criteria; and Receipt of Public Input on Communities of Interest and Potential District Boundaries. (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council receive a report from staff, and conduct a public hearing to receive public input. BACKGROUND: On November 8, 2016, the voters of Rancho Cucamonga approved Ordinance 887, providing for the election of four members of the City Council by four districts, with a Mayor elected at large, and establishing the boundaries and election order of each district. At that time, the Council districts were drawn using the 2010 Census data as was required by law. Following each U.S. Census, which occurs every ten years, cities with by-district election systems must use the new census data to review and, if needed, redraw district lines to reflect how local populations have changed. This process, called redistricting, ensures all districts have nearly equal population. By law, the City must hold at least four (4) public hearings that enable community members to provide input on the drawing of district maps. At least one hearing must occur before the city or county draws draft maps. At least two public hearings must occur after the drawing of draft maps. The Government Code requires that a final map be adopted and submitted to the County no later than April 18, 2022. The City has scheduled five (5) hearing dates for the Council Redistricting process. All hearings are scheduled to take place at 8:00 pm in the City Council Chambers: Wednesday, September 15, 2021 Wednesday, November 3, 2021 Wednesday, January 19, 2022 Wednesday, February 2, 2022 Wednesday, March 2, 2022 Page 407 Page 2 1 0 9 5 The first two hearings were held on September 15 and November 3, 2021. Recordings of those hearings are available at www.drawrc.org. The districts must now be redrawn using the 2020 census data and in compliance with the FAIR MAPS Act, which was adopted by the California legislature as AB 849 and took effect January 1, 2020. Under the Act, the Council shall draw and adopt boundaries using the following criteria in the listed order of priority in accordance with Elections Code 21601(c): 1. Comply with the federal requirements of equal population and the Voting Rights Act 2. Geographically contiguous 3. Undivided neighborhoods and “communities of interest” (socio-economic geographic areas that should be kept together) 4. Easily identifiable boundaries 5. Compact (do not bypass one group of people to get to a more distant group of people) 6. Shall not favor or discriminate against a political party Once the prioritized criteria are met, other traditional districting principles can be considered, such as: 1. Minimize the number of voters delayed from voting in 2022 to 2024 2. Respect voters’ choices / continuity in office 3. Future population growth ANALYSIS: The purposes for Public Hearing #3 include: Reviewing our demographer’s preliminary analysis of the Census 2020 demographic data, including the prisoner-adjusted data released by the State of California on September 20, 2021 Review of the public mapping tool that is available for members of the public to consider the data and submit their own City Council District maps for consideration Review of any map drafts received from the public to date Reviewing the draft map(s) that have been developed to date in conjunction with the demographer Receiving public input in communities of interest and potential district boundaries At the hearing, National Demographics Corporation and staff will review maps that have been developed to date, and any public map submittals. As of this writing, no map submittals from the public have been received. As noted prior to the last hearing, the Council will recall that in November 2017, the City entered into a Mutual Release and Settlement Agreement with the Southwest Voter Registration Project Page 408 Page 3 1 0 9 5 (“SVREP”) and Louisa Ollague (collectively “Plaintiff”), settling a lawsuit alleging a violation of the California Voting Rights Act. Among other terms, that Agreement and its subsequent Amendment No. 1 provide for Plaintiffs’ participation in the redistricting process to occur following the 2020 Census, and specifying certain timelines for that participation. In accordance with that settlement agreement and amendment, the City submitted a draft map to the Plaintiffs for discussion and consideration by November 12, 2021. To that end, Draft Map 103 was provided to the Plaintiffs on October 29, 2021, and then presented as one of three draft maps at the redistricting public hearing on November 3, 2021. This draft meets the required federal and state criteria, and would make minimal changes to the existing City Council District boundaries. Since that time, discussions with the Plaintiffs have been ongoing. Other draft maps are being prepared for consideration that will be presented at the January 19 public hearing, with the goal of reaching an agreement between the parties on a single map. While discussions with the Plaintiffs are ongoing, the City Council will continue to receive public input on this matter, including map submissions from the public, for further consideration at the subsequent public hearings. These two processes – the public input and hearing process, and the timelines and processes contained in the settlement agreement - will continue to be conducted concurrently. No further public comments have been received since the last hearing date. The public is encouraged to participate in the hearing. Residents are encouraged to visit www.drawrc.org to follow updates on the redistricting process, review data and materials, and participate in the process by offering comments and submitting maps for consideration. The next scheduled public hearing will be held on Wednesday, February 2, 2022. FISCAL IMPACT: None COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: Conducting this public hearing is in keeping with the City Council’s mission to ensure and advance the quality of life for the community through inclusive decision making. ATTACHMENTS: N/A Page 409 01/19/2022 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - ADDITIONAL CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED FOR ITEM G1 From: Timothy Walker <scarletwalker13@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2022 4:51 PM To: City Clerk <City.Clerk@cityofrc.us> Subject: Rancho Cucamonga Dear City Clerk, I would like to submit a city council map for the City of Rancho Cucamonga’s redistricting process . Below are key points of the city that are kept together in each of these districts. I’ve included the 2020 Census Blocks equivalency file along with a photo of the map submitted. Please let me know if I forgot to include anything. Thank you and have a great day . District 1 (Northwest) • Keeps together the historic Alta Loma community • Demographics, socioeconomic factors, and housing prices are the most similar • North of the 210, it takes in the portion of the city WEST of Haven • Most of the Alta Loma School District is grouped into the district • Alta Loma High School is in this district • Absorbs the Red Hill community and adjacent neighborhoods west of Hellman Ave. and north of Foothill Blvd. • Sam Maloof House and John Rains House kept together in this district District 2 (South) • 44.5% Latino CVAP • Highest Black CVAP • Serves all of the Cucamonga School District and portion of Central School District • Cities manufacturing hub is in this portion of the city • Quakes Stadium & Animal Shelter are in this district • Northtown Community of Interest (COI) kept whole • Keeps the entirety of the city south of Foothill Blvd. together • Doesn’t go north of Baseline Rd., east of Hermosa Ave. and west of Hellman Ave. District 3 (Center) • Captures the city-center of Rancho Cucamonga • Central Park & Senior Center is included in this district • Second highest Asian and Black CVAP of all the districts • Fastest expanding section of the city • Most diverse section of the city • Central School District is the primary School District that serves this district, in additions to portions of Alta Loma School District and Etiwanda School District • Rancho Cucamonga High School is in this district District 4 (Northeast) • Historic Etiwanda community • Highest Asian CVAP population • Captures the eastern end of the city, which is still expanding • North of the 210, it takes in the portion of the city EAST of Haven • Wealthier families are in this district • Victoria Gardens Mall is apart of this district • Most of the Etiwanda School District is in this school district • Etiwanda High School and Los Osos High School are in this district • Chaffey College is grouped into this district GEOID20 District 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 1 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 4 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 2 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 6.07E+13 3 District Total Pop Devation Total VAP White Minority 1 43542 -0.16%32482 56.47%43.53% 2 43671 0.13%30113 31.99%68.01% 3 43763 0.34%29468 39.86%60.14% 4 43477 -0.31%29856 38.02%61.98% Hispanic Black Asian Native Pacific 30.26%4.71%7.17%1.11%0.04% 44.49%14.95%6.91%1.34%0.52% 32.83%12.90%12.48%0.72%0.77% 34.94%10.66%15.32%0.19%0.05% City of Rancho Cucamonga Redistricting 2021-2022 1/19/2022 Todd Tatum National Demographics Corporation 2 Redistricting Process 2*SB 594 would explicitly confirm maps may be adopted by resolution. Step Description Two Initial Hearings September 16 & November 3 The first hearing held prior to release of draft maps. Education and to solicit input on the communities in the Districts. The second hearing comes after the release of the California Data. There will Draft maps to review on November 3, 2021 Census Data Release Mid/Late August Census Bureau releases official 2020 Census population data. California Data Release September 27, 2021 California Statewide Database releases California’s official ‘prisoner- adjusted’ 2020 redistricting data. Three Draft Map Hearings January 19 & February 2 & February 16 Three Public Hearings to discuss and revise the draft maps and to discuss the election sequence. Final map could be decided at Final Hearing. Map Adoption By April 17, 2022 Final map must be posted at least 7 days prior to adoption. Map adopted via ordinance.* 3 Equal Population Federal Voting Rights Act No Racial Gerrymandering Minimize voters shifted to different election years Respect voters’ choices / continuity in office Future population growth Preserving the core of existing districts 1. Federal Laws 2. California Criteria for Cities (rank ordered) 1.Geographically contiguous 2.Undivided neighborhoods and “communities of interest” (Socio-economic geographic areas that should be kept together) 3.Easily identifiable boundaries 4.Compact (Do not bypass one group of people to get to a more distant group of people) Prohibited: “Shall not favor or discriminate against a political party.” 3. Other Traditional Redistricting Principles 3 Redistricting Rules and Goals 4 Initial Draft Maps NDC has developed 4 draft maps for the City Council to review. The maps Number 103, and more recently 104, were presented to Plaintiffs per the City’s settlement and discussion is ongoing. 5 6 NDC Rancho Cucamonga Map 103 Rancho Cucamonga 103 District 1 2 3 4 Total Total Pop 44,007 43,939 45,130 41,733 174,809 Deviation from ideal 305 237 1,428 -1,969 3,397 % Deviation 0.70%0.54%3.27%-4.51%7.77% Total Pop % Hisp 35.8%48%34%32%37% % NH White 47%23%31%36%34% % NH Black 5%13%11%8%10% % Asian-American 9%13%20%21%16% Citizen Voting Age Pop Total 32,610 30,975 30,923 28,607 123,115 % Hisp 31%43%35%30%35% % NH White 56%30%35%44%41% % NH Black 4%16%15%9%11% % Asian/Pac.Isl.6%10%13%15%11% Voter Registration (Nov 2020) Total 30,758 21,492 25,743 27,038 105,031 % Latino est.29%42%32%29%32% % Spanish-Surnamed 27%38%29%27%30% % Asian-Surnamed 3%5%7%8%6% % Filipino-Surnamed 1%2%3%2%2% % NH White est.64%37%44%53%51% % NH Black 4%17%17%10%11% Voter Turnout (Nov 2020) Total 26,175 16,730 21,413 22,767 87,085 % Latino est.28%40%31%28%31% % Spanish-Surnamed 26%37%28%26%29% % Asian-Surnamed 3%5%7%8%5% % Filipino-Surnamed 1%2%3%2%2% % NH White est.65%38%45%54%52% % NH Black 4%17%17%10%11% 7 8 NDC Rancho Cucamonga Map 104 Rancho Cucamonga 104 District 1 2 3 4 Total Total Pop 43,400 44,600 42,439 44,370 174,809 Deviation from ideal -302 898 -1,263 668 2,161 % Deviation -0.69%2.05%-2.89%1.53%4.94% Total Pop % Hisp 34.4%48%34%33%37% % NH White 47%25%31%35%34% % NH Black 5%12%12%8%10% % Asian-American 10%11%21%21%16% Citizen Voting Age Pop Total 31,777 31,634 29,010 30,693 123,115 % Hisp 29%44%36%31%35% % NH White 58%32%33%42%41% % NH Black 4%15%16%9%11% % Asian/Pac.Isl.7%8%13%16%11% Voter Registration (Nov 2020) Total 30,511 22,426 23,793 28,301 105,031 % Latino est.28%43%32%30%32% % Spanish-Surnamed 25%39%29%27%30% % Asian-Surnamed 4%4%7%8%6% % Filipino-Surnamed 1%2%3%2%2% % NH White est.65%39%43%51%51% % NH Black 4%16%18%10%11% Voter Turnout (Nov 2020) Total 26,020 17,543 19,668 23,854 87,085 % Latino est.27%41%31%29%31% % Spanish-Surnamed 25%37%28%27%29% % Asian-Surnamed 3%4%7%8%5% % Filipino-Surnamed 1%2%3%2%2% % NH White est.66%40%43%52%52% % NH Black 4%16%18%10%11% 9 Public Mapping and Map Review Tools Different tools for different purposes Different tools for different levels of technical skill and interest Simple “review draft maps” tool Easy-to-use “Draw your neighborhood” tool Paper-and Excel-based simple “Draw a draft map” tools that will have a link on the drawrc.org webpage Whether you use the powerful online mapping tool, excel, the paper kit, or just draw on a napkin…we welcome your maps! 10Date Simple Map Drawing Tool Paper “Public Participation Kit” Easy to use Total Population Counts only –no demographic numbers 11 “Public Participation Kit” For those who know Excel and do not wish to use online tools Adds CVAP data Excel does the math Date Simple Map Drawing Tool + Excel Supplement 12 Simple Map Review Tool Online Interactive Review Map ESRI’s “ArcGIS Online” –similar to Google Maps in ease of use Used to review, analyze and compare maps, not to create them Includes overlays of “community of interest” and other data 12 13 Redistricting Process Details Date(s)Description Comments September 16, 2021 1st Public Hearing November 3, 2021 2nd Public Hearing September -October 2021 Mapping software released to the public *Estimated time depending on Census data January 19, 2022 3rd Public Hearing January 24, 2022 Maps due from the Public February 2, 2022 4th Public Hearing to consider Draft maps, make preliminary selection February 16, 2022 5th Public Hearing and Council adopt District map April 17, 2022 Deadline to adopt and submit map to Registrar 14 Public Hearing & Discussion 14 Any Questions on the Draft Maps presented tonight? Any questions about the mapping tools? Any questions on the process as it relates to the Settlement Agreement? 15 Share Your Thoughts Website https://drawrc.org Phone (909) 774-2023 Email city.clerk@cityofrc.us 15 DATE:January 19, 2022 TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY:Noah Daniels, Finance Director SUBJECT:Consideration of an Agreement with SDI Presence LLC for Enterprise Resource Planning Software Consulting Services and Authorizing an Appropriation in the Amount of $270,000. (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council approve an agreement with SDI Presence LLC (SDI) for enterprise resource planning (ERP) software consulting services and authorize an appropriation of $270,000 to account 1714001-5300. BACKGROUND: In the City’s fledgling years, the City developed an in-house financial system to process the accounting transactions and provide financial information for reporting. Then in the early 2000s, as a result of natural growth, a more sophisticated financial system was necessary to handle the financial transactions and business processes. The City procured a financial system that met the developing needs at that time. Since then, iterations and versions of that same software, ONESolution, have provided various degrees of marginal improvement. More than twenty years after implementing that system, the City’s size and complexity are again outgrowing the financial system’s abilities; the City is now a nearly $300 million public corporation compared to $140 million in the Fiscal Year 2000/01. ONESolution lacks features found in other financial systems on the market that can handle the increasingly complex financial transactions in today’s business operations. Processes central for daily accounting and financial recordkeeping, like accounts payable, procurement, and financial planning, are underperforming compared with those modern business systems. Numerous issues have been experienced while attempting to improve the existing financial system due to the developer’s various technical and resource-related problems. The cause of these issues stems from multiple changes in ownership during a short timeframe and a change in headquarters location from California to Florida, which resulted in a significant loss of legacy talent that served the City over the last two decades. In addition, the current developer has demonstrated fewer resources and an apparent lack of investment in their financial and administrative products, shifting more development and investment to the public safety sector products. These issues have also contributed towards diminishing support and technical services with the current version. There are also significant concerns that ONESolution could eventually become unsupported and future development would not be possible. Among those concerns is that ONESolution’s core Page 410 Page 2 1 0 8 6 platform is built on the COBOL programming language platform. Resources to support this legacy platform are limited, leaving the developer potentially unable to staff talent to manage ONESolution in the long term. In Fall 2021, City staff began to evaluate ONESolution and formulate a comprehensive recommendation to City Council to ensure the City has a modern financial system, and initially planned to recommend the City make improvements to ONESolution and determine if it could facilitate the City’s long-term needs. However, despite the developer’s attempts to identify resources and a timeline to improve the existing financial system, no resources have been secured up to this point. There are also concerns about the cost and time investment from implementing a new version of ONESolution based on the lack of features and the diminishing technical and customer support experienced. ANALYSIS: At this time, it is recommended that the City begin the procurement process to identify a new ERP system to replace the existing financial system. A new financial system will improve business processes and operational effectiveness by implementing industry best practices and automation of manual processes. In addition, more modern financial systems have increased financial and resource management functions, which improve the ability to analyze data and generate reports, improving decision-making overall. Lastly, access to technology supports the City’s evolving needs and enables the City to meet future business functions, regulatory, or industry changes, all of which become more sophisticated over time. A consultant to provide project management services is essential for the ERP system procurement and implementation success. A consultant assisting with the selection, procurement, and implementation of a new ERP system will provide valuable layers of experience and enhance approaches during a costly and time extensive process undertaken once every few decades. In Fall 2021, SDI, a firm that helps public sector clients plan, procure, implement, and manage ERP system procurement and project management, provided an overview of their services. SDI has assisted neighboring agencies, including Ontario, Cucamonga Valley Water District, Chino Hills, Glendale, Redlands, and Manhattan Beach. Additionally, SDI has an outstanding team of seasoned professionals with extensive experience supporting public agency financial system projects secured for the City, including the former CIO from the City of Ontario as the senior project manager. Due to these factors and positive feedback from SDI customers, City staff requested a service proposal to assess the City’s ERP system needs, recommend vendors that meet those needs, and assist with implementation project management. A general description of the tasks performed by SDI and timeline for the ERP system procurement schedules are as follows: Phase 1 – January to February SDI will begin the process by conducting planning and kickoff meetings to clearly understand the City’s goals and objectives, roles and responsibilities, approach, tasks, and timeline. The outcome for these meetings is developing a well-defined work plan and process for accomplishing the City’s overall objectives for a new financial system. Page 411 Page 3 1 0 8 6 Phase 2 – February to April During this phase, SDI will begin evaluating the City’s existing financial system and conduct workshops to identify needs for a new financial system. Using the existing financial system as a baseline for alternative financial systems and a comprehensive understanding and prioritization of new financial system features and functionality, SDI will analyze ERP system options and facilitate a workshop to results before developing a plan for the final phase. Phase 3 – April to May In the final phase, SDI will prepare a Request for Information (RFI) outlining the City’s needs, objectives, and processes for potential vendors. SDI will manage any vendor inquiries and assist with the reivew of the RFI responses to determine which short-listed vendors will be invited to Proof-of-Capabilities (POC) participation. The POC is a critical component of the selection process, as it ensures that vendors can demonstrate the capabilities of their products. The final deliverable from SDI is a recommendation for an ERP system to the City Council. SDI will then provide project management services during implementation to ensure the achievement of the goals and objectives developed during the needs assessment. FISCAL IMPACT: The estimated project costs for SDI are $270,000. This estimated cost includes assistance with ERP system procurement, which is anticipated to be completed in May 2022; project management services for implementation for Fiscal Year 2022/23; and contingencies for both projects. However, these are estimated amounts, and the City Council will receive updates as the project moves forward. An appropriation of $270,000 into account number 1714001-5300 (Contract Services) from the City’s Computer Equipment and Technology Replacement Fund is requested to perform these services. The estimated cost of the ERP system is not included in this estimate and will be determined over the coming months and provided to the City Council as part of the Fiscal Year 2022/23 budget process. COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: The ERP software consulting supports the City Council’s vision to build on our success as a world- class community by intentionally embracing and anticipating the future and creating opportunities for all to thrive. ATTACHMENTS: None Page 412 Financial System Procurement and Selection January 19, 2022 •The City’s financial system has evolved, mirroring business process needs. •Current business processes are outgrowing existing financial system. Introduction and Background In-house developed financial system Implemented current financial software Need for modern financial system Early years 2000/2001 Now Concerns and Issues In addition to underperforming processes, there have been experienced: Dim inishing customer and technical support. Core platform is developed on legacy programming language. Analysis The City needs a modern financial system for current and future business processes. Streamline business processes Reduce or eliminate redundant data entry and manual processes Provide interface to promote system use and productivity Create comprehensive and integrated solution for business functionsImprove necessary reports and access to data Recommendation City Staff recom m ends starting the procurement process for a new financial system: 1.Approving an agreement with SDI Presence, LLC for consulting services for selection and implementation of the financial system, and 2.Authorizing an appropriation for $270,000 for the consulting services. Project Tim eline and Milestones Phase 1 January to February •Work Plan •Kickoff Meeting Phase 2 February to April •System requirement workshops •Create vendor listing Phase 3 April to May •Release RFI to solution providers •Proof-of- capabilities •Recommendation to City Council Next Steps After Phase 3 Around May/June, City staff will update the City Council with: 1.A recommendation for a new financial system, and 2.An estimated project scope and timeline for implementation. Questions ?