HomeMy WebLinkAbout2022/04/06 - Regular Meeting Agenda PacketMayor
L. Dennis Michael
Mayor Pro Tem
Lynne B. Kennedy
Members of the City
Council:
Ryan A. Hutchison
Kristine D. Scott
Sam Spagnolo
AMENDED AGENDA
(ITEM D14 RECOMMENDED TO BE ADDED TO CLOSED SESSION 4/6/202 2
10:00AM)
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
April 6, 2022
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARD – CITY COUNCIL
HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY SUCCESSOR AGENCY – PUBLIC
FINANCE AUTHORITY
CLOSED SESSION TRICOMMUNITIES ROOM 4:30 P.M.
REGULAR MEETINGS COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 P.M.
The City Council meets regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in the
Council Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive. It Is the Intent to conclude the meeting by 10:00
p.m. unless extended by the concurrence of the City Council. Agendas, minutes, and recordings of
meetings can be found at www.cityofrc.us or by contacting the City Clerk's Office at 9097742023. Live
Broadcast available on Channel 3 (RCTV 3).
CLOSED SESSION – 4:30 P.M.
TRICOMMUNITIES ROOM
ROLL CALL: Mayor Michael
Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy
Council Members Hutchison, Scott, and Spagnolo
A. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)
B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)
C. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS
D. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION
D1.CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR ROBERT NEIUBER, HUMAN RESOURCES
DIRECTOR PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957.6 REGARDING LABOR NEGOTIATIONS
WITH THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY EMPLOYEES’ ASSOCIATION (RCCEA), TEAMSTERS
LOCAL 1932, EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT GROUP – (CITY)
D2.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – PENDING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4)
OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V.
CHAO PING YANG, SBSC CASE NO.: PENDING. (CITY)
D3.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – PENDING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4)
OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V.
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON, SBSC CASE NO.: PENDING. (CITY)
D4.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – PENDING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4)
OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V.
KULAR TRUCK LINE, INC., SBSC CASE NO.: PENDING. (CITY)
D5.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION
54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 9333 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 022916223; NEGOTIATING
PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND OVERLAND, PACIFIC AND CUTLER,
REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON,
OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING
PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – (CITY)
D6.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – PENDING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4)
OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V.
SCG/DP ETIWANDA LLC, SBSC CASE NO.: PENDING. (CITY)
D7.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – PENDING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4)
OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V.
BTC III RANCHO CUCAMONGA LOGISTICS CENTER LP, SBSC CASE NO.: PENDING. (CITY)
D8.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – PENDING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4)
OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V.
GOODMAN RANCHO SPE LLC, SBSC CASE NO.: PENDING. (CITY)
D9.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – PENDING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4)
OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V.
LIGHTING P.M. LLC, SBSC CASE NO.: PENDING. (CITY)
D10.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – PENDING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4)
OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V.
BCORE IE WEST OWNER LLC, SBSC CASE NO.: PENDING. (CITY)
D11.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – PENDING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4)
OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V.
TOWER OF POWER CORPORATION, SBSC CASE NO.: PENDING. (CITY)
D12.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL ANTICIPATED LITIGATION; SIGNIFICANT EXPOSURE
TO LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (2) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9: 1
CASE; THE CITY HAS RECEIVED A CLAIM PURSUANT TO THE GOVERNMENT CLAIMS ACT
RELATING TO ALLEGED DAMAGE AND THE PROPOSED RELOCATION OF A PIECE OF CITY
OWNED PUBLIC ART. A COPY OF THE CLAIM IS AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW IN THE CITY
CLERK'S OFFICE (CITY)
D13.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION
54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 12467 BASE LINE ROAD IDENTIFIED AS PARCEL
NUMBERS 1090331030000, 1090331040000, 1089581040000; NEGOTIATING PARTIES JOHN
GILLISON, CITY MANAGER REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND
JOSEPH FILIPPI, JOSEPH FILIPPI WINERY AND VINEYARDS; REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS.
– (CITY)
D14.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE
SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA
METROLINK STATION IDENTIFIED AS PARCEL NUMBERS 020927211, 020914321, AND
020927222 AND CERTAIN ADJACENT RIGHTOFWAY INCLUDED WITHIN THE STATION
FOOTPRINT; CITY NEGOTIATOR: JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, REPRESENTING THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; NEGOTIATING PARTIES: SARAH WATERSON,
PRESIDENT, REPRESENTING DESERTXPRESS ENTERPRISES, LLC, DBA AS BRIGHTLINE
WEST; UNDER NEGOTIATION: PRICE AND TERMS OF PAYMENT. – CITY
E. RECESS – Closed Session to Recess to the Regular City Council Meeting at 7:00 P.M. in the Council
Chambers at City Hall, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California.
REGULAR MEETING – 7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL:Mayor Michael
Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy
Council Members Hutchison, Scott, and Spagnolo
A. AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDA
B. ANNOUNCEMENT / PRESENTATIONS
B1.Presentation of a Proclamation Declaring the Month of April 2022 as "Donate Life Month".
C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
Members of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor
Agency, and Public Finance Authority. This is the time and place for the general public to address
the Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing
Authority Board, and City Council on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the
Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board,
and City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Fire Protection
District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Council
may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting.
Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the
Mayor, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be
addressed directly to the Fire Board, Agencies, Successor Agency, Authority Board, or City Council not to the
members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected.
Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any
activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting.
The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of the
business portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topic
contained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for these
business items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of the
agenda commences. Any other public communications which have not concluded during this one hour period
may resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed.
CONSENT CALENDARS:
The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and noncontroversial. They will be acted
upon without discussion unless an item is removed by Council Member for discussion.
Members of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, and
Public Finance Authority and may act on the consent calendar for those bodies as part of a single motion with
the City Council consent calendar.
D. CONSENT CALENDAR
D1.Consideration to Approve City and Fire District BiWeekly Payroll in the Total Amount of
$3,530,813.79 and City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers (Excluding Checks Issued to
Southern California Gas Company) in the Total Amount of $8,035,306.01 Dated March 07,
2022, Through March 27, 2022. (CITY/FIRE)
D2.Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers for Checks Issued to
Southern California Gas Company in the Total Amount of $5,739.91 Dated March 07, 2022,
Through March 27, 2022. (CITY/FIRE)
D3.AB 361 Findings for Special Brown Act Requirements for Teleconference. (CITY/FIRE)
D4.Consideration to Accept as Complete, File a Notice of Completion, and Authorize Release of
Retention for the RCFPD Training Center Facility Gas Leak Project (Contract No. FD 2021
004). (FIRE)
D5.Consideration of the Purchase of Dell physical Servers from Sidepath, Inc. in the Amount Not to
Exceed $280,000. (CITY/FIRE)
D6.Consideration to Award a Contract to ConvergeOne, Inc. for Replacement of Library Network
Equipment Under the USAC ERate Program in the Amount of $360,033. (CITY)
D7.Consideration to Approve a Household Hazardous Waste Collection Agreement with the
County of San Bernardino Fire Protection District. (CITY)
D8.Consideration to Declare Surplus for Retired Computers, Monitors, Miscellaneous Equipment
and Vehicles That Have Been Deemed No Longer Needed, Obsolete or Unusable as Surplus.
(CITY)
D9.Consideration to Accept as Complete, File Notice of Completion and Authorize Release of
Retention and Bonds for the EV Chargers at Various Locations Project (Contract No. 2021
109). (CITY)
D10.Consideration to Accept as Complete, File the Notice of Completion and Authorize Release of
Retention and Bonds for the Fiscal Year 2021/22 Local Overlay Pavement Rehabilitation
Project (Contract No. 2021117). (CITY)
D11.Consideration to Adopt an Annexation Map Showing Assessor Parcel Number 110019104
Located at 7878 East Avenue, Which is Proposed to be Annexed Into CFD No. 851; and
Approval to Adopt a Resolution of Intention to Annex Territory Referred to as Annexation No. 22
1 into Community Facilities District No. 851, Specifying Services Proposed to be Financed, to
Set and Specify the Special Taxes Proposed to be Levied Within the Annexation Territory and
Set a Time and Place for a Public Hearing Related to the Annexation. (RESOLUTION NO. FD
2022006) (RESOLUTION NO. FD 2022007) (FIRE)
E. CONSENT CALENDAR ORDINANCE(S) SECOND READING/ADOPTION
E1.Consideration of Second Reading and Adoption of the following:
ORDINANCE NO. 997
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADJUSTING THE
BOUNDARIES OF THE FOUR CITY COUNCIL DISTRICTS AND ADOPTING A NEW OFFICIAL
COUNCIL DISTRICT MAP FOR THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BASED ON THE
RESULTS OF THE 2020 DECENNIAL CENSUS
F. ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING ITEM(S)
G. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM(S) CITY/FIRE DISTRICT
G1.Discussion, Consideration and Possible Action to Introduce, Waive Reading of and Adopt by a Four
fifths Vote, Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 999, Extending for an Additional Year (365 days) through
April 20, 2023, an Existing Moratorium on the Approval of Applications for Building Permits or Other
Entitlements for New Service Station Uses or the Expansion of Existing Service Station Uses in the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, Declaring the Urgency thereof and Making a Determination of Exemption
Under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). (INTERIM URGENCY ORDINANCE NO.
999) (CITY)
H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORT(S)
I. COUNCIL BUSINESS
I1.Consideration of the City Council Community Parks and Landscape Citizens' Oversight
Subcommittee's Recommendation to Appoint Members to the Community Parks and Landscape
Citizens' Oversight Committee. (CITY)
I2.COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS
(Comments to be limited to three minutes per Council Member.)
I3.INTERAGENCY UPDATES
(Update by the City Council to the community on the meetings that were attended.)
J. CITY ATTORNEY ITEMS
K. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
L. ADJOURNMENT
CERTIFICATION
I, Linda A. Troyan, MMC, City Clerk Services Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify
under penalty of perjury that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on at least SeventyTwo (72) hours
prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California and on the
City's website
LINDA A. TROYAN, MMC
CITY CLERK SERVICES DIRECTOR
If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's
office at (909) 4772700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable
arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired.
CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT
“Our Vision is to build on our success as a world class community,to create
an equitable,sustainable,and vibrant city,rich in opportunity for all to thrive.”
Page 1
MayorL. Dennis MichaelMayor Pro TemLynne B. KennedyMembers of the CityCouncil:Ryan A. HutchisonKristine D. ScottSam Spagnolo AMENDED AGENDA(ITEM D14 RECOMMENDED TO BE ADDED TO CLOSED SESSION 4/6/202 210:00AM)CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGAREGULAR MEETING AGENDAApril 6, 202210500 Civic Center DriveRancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARD – CITY COUNCILHOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY SUCCESSOR AGENCY – PUBLICFINANCE AUTHORITYCLOSED SESSION TRICOMMUNITIES ROOM 4:30 P.M.REGULAR MEETINGS COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 P.M.The City Council meets regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in theCouncil Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive. It Is the Intent to conclude the meeting by 10:00p.m. unless extended by the concurrence of the City Council. Agendas, minutes, and recordings ofmeetings can be found at www.cityofrc.us or by contacting the City Clerk's Office at 9097742023. LiveBroadcast available on Channel 3 (RCTV 3).CLOSED SESSION – 4:30 P.M. TRICOMMUNITIES ROOM ROLL CALL: Mayor Michael Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy Council Members Hutchison, Scott, and Spagnolo A. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)C. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTSD. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSIOND1.CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR ROBERT NEIUBER, HUMAN RESOURCES
DIRECTOR PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957.6 REGARDING LABOR NEGOTIATIONS
WITH THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY EMPLOYEES’ ASSOCIATION (RCCEA), TEAMSTERS
LOCAL 1932, EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT GROUP – (CITY)
D2.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – PENDING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4)
OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V.
CHAO PING YANG, SBSC CASE NO.: PENDING. (CITY)
D3.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – PENDING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4)
OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V.
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON, SBSC CASE NO.: PENDING. (CITY)
D4.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – PENDING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4)
OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V.
KULAR TRUCK LINE, INC., SBSC CASE NO.: PENDING. (CITY)
D5.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION
54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 9333 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 022916223; NEGOTIATING
PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND OVERLAND, PACIFIC AND CUTLER,
REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON,
OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING
PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – (CITY)
D6.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – PENDING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4)
OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V.
SCG/DP ETIWANDA LLC, SBSC CASE NO.: PENDING. (CITY)
D7.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – PENDING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4)
OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V.
BTC III RANCHO CUCAMONGA LOGISTICS CENTER LP, SBSC CASE NO.: PENDING. (CITY)
D8.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – PENDING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4)
OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V.
GOODMAN RANCHO SPE LLC, SBSC CASE NO.: PENDING. (CITY)
D9.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – PENDING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4)
OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V.
LIGHTING P.M. LLC, SBSC CASE NO.: PENDING. (CITY)
D10.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – PENDING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4)
OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V.
BCORE IE WEST OWNER LLC, SBSC CASE NO.: PENDING. (CITY)
D11.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – PENDING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4)
OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V.
TOWER OF POWER CORPORATION, SBSC CASE NO.: PENDING. (CITY)
D12.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL ANTICIPATED LITIGATION; SIGNIFICANT EXPOSURE
TO LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (2) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9: 1
CASE; THE CITY HAS RECEIVED A CLAIM PURSUANT TO THE GOVERNMENT CLAIMS ACT
RELATING TO ALLEGED DAMAGE AND THE PROPOSED RELOCATION OF A PIECE OF CITY
OWNED PUBLIC ART. A COPY OF THE CLAIM IS AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW IN THE CITY
CLERK'S OFFICE (CITY)
D13.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION
54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 12467 BASE LINE ROAD IDENTIFIED AS PARCEL
NUMBERS 1090331030000, 1090331040000, 1089581040000; NEGOTIATING PARTIES JOHN
GILLISON, CITY MANAGER REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND
JOSEPH FILIPPI, JOSEPH FILIPPI WINERY AND VINEYARDS; REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS.
– (CITY)
D14.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE
SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA
METROLINK STATION IDENTIFIED AS PARCEL NUMBERS 020927211, 020914321, AND
020927222 AND CERTAIN ADJACENT RIGHTOFWAY INCLUDED WITHIN THE STATION
FOOTPRINT; CITY NEGOTIATOR: JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, REPRESENTING THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; NEGOTIATING PARTIES: SARAH WATERSON,
PRESIDENT, REPRESENTING DESERTXPRESS ENTERPRISES, LLC, DBA AS BRIGHTLINE
WEST; UNDER NEGOTIATION: PRICE AND TERMS OF PAYMENT. – CITY
E. RECESS – Closed Session to Recess to the Regular City Council Meeting at 7:00 P.M. in the Council
Chambers at City Hall, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California.
REGULAR MEETING – 7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL:Mayor Michael
Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy
Council Members Hutchison, Scott, and Spagnolo
A. AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDA
B. ANNOUNCEMENT / PRESENTATIONS
B1.Presentation of a Proclamation Declaring the Month of April 2022 as "Donate Life Month".
C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
Members of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor
Agency, and Public Finance Authority. This is the time and place for the general public to address
the Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing
Authority Board, and City Council on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the
Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board,
and City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Fire Protection
District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Council
may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting.
Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the
Mayor, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be
addressed directly to the Fire Board, Agencies, Successor Agency, Authority Board, or City Council not to the
members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected.
Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any
activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting.
The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of the
business portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topic
contained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for these
business items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of the
agenda commences. Any other public communications which have not concluded during this one hour period
may resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed.
CONSENT CALENDARS:
The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and noncontroversial. They will be acted
upon without discussion unless an item is removed by Council Member for discussion.
Members of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, and
Public Finance Authority and may act on the consent calendar for those bodies as part of a single motion with
the City Council consent calendar.
D. CONSENT CALENDAR
D1.Consideration to Approve City and Fire District BiWeekly Payroll in the Total Amount of
$3,530,813.79 and City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers (Excluding Checks Issued to
Southern California Gas Company) in the Total Amount of $8,035,306.01 Dated March 07,
2022, Through March 27, 2022. (CITY/FIRE)
D2.Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers for Checks Issued to
Southern California Gas Company in the Total Amount of $5,739.91 Dated March 07, 2022,
Through March 27, 2022. (CITY/FIRE)
D3.AB 361 Findings for Special Brown Act Requirements for Teleconference. (CITY/FIRE)
D4.Consideration to Accept as Complete, File a Notice of Completion, and Authorize Release of
Retention for the RCFPD Training Center Facility Gas Leak Project (Contract No. FD 2021
004). (FIRE)
D5.Consideration of the Purchase of Dell physical Servers from Sidepath, Inc. in the Amount Not to
Exceed $280,000. (CITY/FIRE)
D6.Consideration to Award a Contract to ConvergeOne, Inc. for Replacement of Library Network
Equipment Under the USAC ERate Program in the Amount of $360,033. (CITY)
D7.Consideration to Approve a Household Hazardous Waste Collection Agreement with the
County of San Bernardino Fire Protection District. (CITY)
D8.Consideration to Declare Surplus for Retired Computers, Monitors, Miscellaneous Equipment
and Vehicles That Have Been Deemed No Longer Needed, Obsolete or Unusable as Surplus.
(CITY)
D9.Consideration to Accept as Complete, File Notice of Completion and Authorize Release of
Retention and Bonds for the EV Chargers at Various Locations Project (Contract No. 2021
109). (CITY)
D10.Consideration to Accept as Complete, File the Notice of Completion and Authorize Release of
Retention and Bonds for the Fiscal Year 2021/22 Local Overlay Pavement Rehabilitation
Project (Contract No. 2021117). (CITY)
D11.Consideration to Adopt an Annexation Map Showing Assessor Parcel Number 110019104
Located at 7878 East Avenue, Which is Proposed to be Annexed Into CFD No. 851; and
Approval to Adopt a Resolution of Intention to Annex Territory Referred to as Annexation No. 22
1 into Community Facilities District No. 851, Specifying Services Proposed to be Financed, to
Set and Specify the Special Taxes Proposed to be Levied Within the Annexation Territory and
Set a Time and Place for a Public Hearing Related to the Annexation. (RESOLUTION NO. FD
2022006) (RESOLUTION NO. FD 2022007) (FIRE)
E. CONSENT CALENDAR ORDINANCE(S) SECOND READING/ADOPTION
E1.Consideration of Second Reading and Adoption of the following:
ORDINANCE NO. 997
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADJUSTING THE
BOUNDARIES OF THE FOUR CITY COUNCIL DISTRICTS AND ADOPTING A NEW OFFICIAL
COUNCIL DISTRICT MAP FOR THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BASED ON THE
RESULTS OF THE 2020 DECENNIAL CENSUS
F. ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING ITEM(S)
G. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM(S) CITY/FIRE DISTRICT
G1.Discussion, Consideration and Possible Action to Introduce, Waive Reading of and Adopt by a Four
fifths Vote, Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 999, Extending for an Additional Year (365 days) through
April 20, 2023, an Existing Moratorium on the Approval of Applications for Building Permits or Other
Entitlements for New Service Station Uses or the Expansion of Existing Service Station Uses in the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, Declaring the Urgency thereof and Making a Determination of Exemption
Under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). (INTERIM URGENCY ORDINANCE NO.
999) (CITY)
H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORT(S)
I. COUNCIL BUSINESS
I1.Consideration of the City Council Community Parks and Landscape Citizens' Oversight
Subcommittee's Recommendation to Appoint Members to the Community Parks and Landscape
Citizens' Oversight Committee. (CITY)
I2.COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS
(Comments to be limited to three minutes per Council Member.)
I3.INTERAGENCY UPDATES
(Update by the City Council to the community on the meetings that were attended.)
J. CITY ATTORNEY ITEMS
K. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
L. ADJOURNMENT
CERTIFICATION
I, Linda A. Troyan, MMC, City Clerk Services Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify
under penalty of perjury that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on at least SeventyTwo (72) hours
prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California and on the
City's website
LINDA A. TROYAN, MMC
CITY CLERK SERVICES DIRECTOR
If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's
office at (909) 4772700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable
arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired.
CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT
“Our Vision is to build on our success as a world class community,to create
an equitable,sustainable,and vibrant city,rich in opportunity for all to thrive.”
Page 2
MayorL. Dennis MichaelMayor Pro TemLynne B. KennedyMembers of the CityCouncil:Ryan A. HutchisonKristine D. ScottSam Spagnolo AMENDED AGENDA(ITEM D14 RECOMMENDED TO BE ADDED TO CLOSED SESSION 4/6/202 210:00AM)CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGAREGULAR MEETING AGENDAApril 6, 202210500 Civic Center DriveRancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARD – CITY COUNCILHOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY SUCCESSOR AGENCY – PUBLICFINANCE AUTHORITYCLOSED SESSION TRICOMMUNITIES ROOM 4:30 P.M.REGULAR MEETINGS COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 P.M.The City Council meets regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in theCouncil Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive. It Is the Intent to conclude the meeting by 10:00p.m. unless extended by the concurrence of the City Council. Agendas, minutes, and recordings ofmeetings can be found at www.cityofrc.us or by contacting the City Clerk's Office at 9097742023. LiveBroadcast available on Channel 3 (RCTV 3).CLOSED SESSION – 4:30 P.M. TRICOMMUNITIES ROOM ROLL CALL: Mayor Michael Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy Council Members Hutchison, Scott, and Spagnolo A. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)C. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTSD. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSIOND1.CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR ROBERT NEIUBER, HUMAN RESOURCESDIRECTOR PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957.6 REGARDING LABOR NEGOTIATIONSWITH THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY EMPLOYEES’ ASSOCIATION (RCCEA), TEAMSTERSLOCAL 1932, EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT GROUP – (CITY)D2.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – PENDING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4)OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V.CHAO PING YANG, SBSC CASE NO.: PENDING. (CITY)D3.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – PENDING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4)OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V.SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON, SBSC CASE NO.: PENDING. (CITY)D4.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – PENDING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4)OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V.KULAR TRUCK LINE, INC., SBSC CASE NO.: PENDING. (CITY)D5.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 9333 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED ASSAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 022916223; NEGOTIATINGPARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND OVERLAND, PACIFIC AND CUTLER,REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON,OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATINGPARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – (CITY)D6.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – PENDING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4)OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V.SCG/DP ETIWANDA LLC, SBSC CASE NO.: PENDING. (CITY)D7.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – PENDING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4)OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V.BTC III RANCHO CUCAMONGA LOGISTICS CENTER LP, SBSC CASE NO.: PENDING. (CITY)D8.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – PENDING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4)OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V.GOODMAN RANCHO SPE LLC, SBSC CASE NO.: PENDING. (CITY)D9.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – PENDING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4)OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V.LIGHTING P.M. LLC, SBSC CASE NO.: PENDING. (CITY)D10.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – PENDING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4)OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V.BCORE IE WEST OWNER LLC, SBSC CASE NO.: PENDING. (CITY)D11.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – PENDING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4)OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V.TOWER OF POWER CORPORATION, SBSC CASE NO.: PENDING. (CITY)D12.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL ANTICIPATED LITIGATION; SIGNIFICANT EXPOSURETO LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (2) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9: 1CASE; THE CITY HAS RECEIVED A CLAIM PURSUANT TO THE GOVERNMENT CLAIMS ACT
RELATING TO ALLEGED DAMAGE AND THE PROPOSED RELOCATION OF A PIECE OF CITY
OWNED PUBLIC ART. A COPY OF THE CLAIM IS AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW IN THE CITY
CLERK'S OFFICE (CITY)
D13.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION
54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 12467 BASE LINE ROAD IDENTIFIED AS PARCEL
NUMBERS 1090331030000, 1090331040000, 1089581040000; NEGOTIATING PARTIES JOHN
GILLISON, CITY MANAGER REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND
JOSEPH FILIPPI, JOSEPH FILIPPI WINERY AND VINEYARDS; REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS.
– (CITY)
D14.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE
SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA
METROLINK STATION IDENTIFIED AS PARCEL NUMBERS 020927211, 020914321, AND
020927222 AND CERTAIN ADJACENT RIGHTOFWAY INCLUDED WITHIN THE STATION
FOOTPRINT; CITY NEGOTIATOR: JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, REPRESENTING THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; NEGOTIATING PARTIES: SARAH WATERSON,
PRESIDENT, REPRESENTING DESERTXPRESS ENTERPRISES, LLC, DBA AS BRIGHTLINE
WEST; UNDER NEGOTIATION: PRICE AND TERMS OF PAYMENT. – CITY
E. RECESS – Closed Session to Recess to the Regular City Council Meeting at 7:00 P.M. in the Council
Chambers at City Hall, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California.
REGULAR MEETING – 7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL:Mayor Michael
Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy
Council Members Hutchison, Scott, and Spagnolo
A. AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDA
B. ANNOUNCEMENT / PRESENTATIONS
B1.Presentation of a Proclamation Declaring the Month of April 2022 as "Donate Life Month".
C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
Members of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor
Agency, and Public Finance Authority. This is the time and place for the general public to address
the Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing
Authority Board, and City Council on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the
Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board,
and City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Fire Protection
District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Council
may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting.
Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the
Mayor, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be
addressed directly to the Fire Board, Agencies, Successor Agency, Authority Board, or City Council not to the
members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected.
Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any
activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting.
The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of the
business portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topic
contained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for these
business items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of the
agenda commences. Any other public communications which have not concluded during this one hour period
may resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed.
CONSENT CALENDARS:
The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and noncontroversial. They will be acted
upon without discussion unless an item is removed by Council Member for discussion.
Members of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, and
Public Finance Authority and may act on the consent calendar for those bodies as part of a single motion with
the City Council consent calendar.
D. CONSENT CALENDAR
D1.Consideration to Approve City and Fire District BiWeekly Payroll in the Total Amount of
$3,530,813.79 and City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers (Excluding Checks Issued to
Southern California Gas Company) in the Total Amount of $8,035,306.01 Dated March 07,
2022, Through March 27, 2022. (CITY/FIRE)
D2.Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers for Checks Issued to
Southern California Gas Company in the Total Amount of $5,739.91 Dated March 07, 2022,
Through March 27, 2022. (CITY/FIRE)
D3.AB 361 Findings for Special Brown Act Requirements for Teleconference. (CITY/FIRE)
D4.Consideration to Accept as Complete, File a Notice of Completion, and Authorize Release of
Retention for the RCFPD Training Center Facility Gas Leak Project (Contract No. FD 2021
004). (FIRE)
D5.Consideration of the Purchase of Dell physical Servers from Sidepath, Inc. in the Amount Not to
Exceed $280,000. (CITY/FIRE)
D6.Consideration to Award a Contract to ConvergeOne, Inc. for Replacement of Library Network
Equipment Under the USAC ERate Program in the Amount of $360,033. (CITY)
D7.Consideration to Approve a Household Hazardous Waste Collection Agreement with the
County of San Bernardino Fire Protection District. (CITY)
D8.Consideration to Declare Surplus for Retired Computers, Monitors, Miscellaneous Equipment
and Vehicles That Have Been Deemed No Longer Needed, Obsolete or Unusable as Surplus.
(CITY)
D9.Consideration to Accept as Complete, File Notice of Completion and Authorize Release of
Retention and Bonds for the EV Chargers at Various Locations Project (Contract No. 2021
109). (CITY)
D10.Consideration to Accept as Complete, File the Notice of Completion and Authorize Release of
Retention and Bonds for the Fiscal Year 2021/22 Local Overlay Pavement Rehabilitation
Project (Contract No. 2021117). (CITY)
D11.Consideration to Adopt an Annexation Map Showing Assessor Parcel Number 110019104
Located at 7878 East Avenue, Which is Proposed to be Annexed Into CFD No. 851; and
Approval to Adopt a Resolution of Intention to Annex Territory Referred to as Annexation No. 22
1 into Community Facilities District No. 851, Specifying Services Proposed to be Financed, to
Set and Specify the Special Taxes Proposed to be Levied Within the Annexation Territory and
Set a Time and Place for a Public Hearing Related to the Annexation. (RESOLUTION NO. FD
2022006) (RESOLUTION NO. FD 2022007) (FIRE)
E. CONSENT CALENDAR ORDINANCE(S) SECOND READING/ADOPTION
E1.Consideration of Second Reading and Adoption of the following:
ORDINANCE NO. 997
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADJUSTING THE
BOUNDARIES OF THE FOUR CITY COUNCIL DISTRICTS AND ADOPTING A NEW OFFICIAL
COUNCIL DISTRICT MAP FOR THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BASED ON THE
RESULTS OF THE 2020 DECENNIAL CENSUS
F. ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING ITEM(S)
G. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM(S) CITY/FIRE DISTRICT
G1.Discussion, Consideration and Possible Action to Introduce, Waive Reading of and Adopt by a Four
fifths Vote, Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 999, Extending for an Additional Year (365 days) through
April 20, 2023, an Existing Moratorium on the Approval of Applications for Building Permits or Other
Entitlements for New Service Station Uses or the Expansion of Existing Service Station Uses in the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, Declaring the Urgency thereof and Making a Determination of Exemption
Under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). (INTERIM URGENCY ORDINANCE NO.
999) (CITY)
H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORT(S)
I. COUNCIL BUSINESS
I1.Consideration of the City Council Community Parks and Landscape Citizens' Oversight
Subcommittee's Recommendation to Appoint Members to the Community Parks and Landscape
Citizens' Oversight Committee. (CITY)
I2.COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS
(Comments to be limited to three minutes per Council Member.)
I3.INTERAGENCY UPDATES
(Update by the City Council to the community on the meetings that were attended.)
J. CITY ATTORNEY ITEMS
K. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
L. ADJOURNMENT
CERTIFICATION
I, Linda A. Troyan, MMC, City Clerk Services Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify
under penalty of perjury that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on at least SeventyTwo (72) hours
prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California and on the
City's website
LINDA A. TROYAN, MMC
CITY CLERK SERVICES DIRECTOR
If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's
office at (909) 4772700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable
arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired.
CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT
“Our Vision is to build on our success as a world class community,to create
an equitable,sustainable,and vibrant city,rich in opportunity for all to thrive.”
Page 3
MayorL. Dennis MichaelMayor Pro TemLynne B. KennedyMembers of the CityCouncil:Ryan A. HutchisonKristine D. ScottSam Spagnolo AMENDED AGENDA(ITEM D14 RECOMMENDED TO BE ADDED TO CLOSED SESSION 4/6/202 210:00AM)CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGAREGULAR MEETING AGENDAApril 6, 202210500 Civic Center DriveRancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARD – CITY COUNCILHOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY SUCCESSOR AGENCY – PUBLICFINANCE AUTHORITYCLOSED SESSION TRICOMMUNITIES ROOM 4:30 P.M.REGULAR MEETINGS COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 P.M.The City Council meets regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in theCouncil Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive. It Is the Intent to conclude the meeting by 10:00p.m. unless extended by the concurrence of the City Council. Agendas, minutes, and recordings ofmeetings can be found at www.cityofrc.us or by contacting the City Clerk's Office at 9097742023. LiveBroadcast available on Channel 3 (RCTV 3).CLOSED SESSION – 4:30 P.M. TRICOMMUNITIES ROOM ROLL CALL: Mayor Michael Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy Council Members Hutchison, Scott, and Spagnolo A. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)C. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTSD. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSIOND1.CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR ROBERT NEIUBER, HUMAN RESOURCESDIRECTOR PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957.6 REGARDING LABOR NEGOTIATIONSWITH THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY EMPLOYEES’ ASSOCIATION (RCCEA), TEAMSTERSLOCAL 1932, EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT GROUP – (CITY)D2.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – PENDING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4)OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V.CHAO PING YANG, SBSC CASE NO.: PENDING. (CITY)D3.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – PENDING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4)OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V.SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON, SBSC CASE NO.: PENDING. (CITY)D4.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – PENDING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4)OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V.KULAR TRUCK LINE, INC., SBSC CASE NO.: PENDING. (CITY)D5.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 9333 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED ASSAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 022916223; NEGOTIATINGPARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND OVERLAND, PACIFIC AND CUTLER,REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON,OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATINGPARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – (CITY)D6.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – PENDING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4)OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V.SCG/DP ETIWANDA LLC, SBSC CASE NO.: PENDING. (CITY)D7.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – PENDING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4)OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V.BTC III RANCHO CUCAMONGA LOGISTICS CENTER LP, SBSC CASE NO.: PENDING. (CITY)D8.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – PENDING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4)OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V.GOODMAN RANCHO SPE LLC, SBSC CASE NO.: PENDING. (CITY)D9.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – PENDING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4)OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V.LIGHTING P.M. LLC, SBSC CASE NO.: PENDING. (CITY)D10.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – PENDING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4)OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V.BCORE IE WEST OWNER LLC, SBSC CASE NO.: PENDING. (CITY)D11.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – PENDING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4)OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V.TOWER OF POWER CORPORATION, SBSC CASE NO.: PENDING. (CITY)D12.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL ANTICIPATED LITIGATION; SIGNIFICANT EXPOSURETO LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (2) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9: 1CASE; THE CITY HAS RECEIVED A CLAIM PURSUANT TO THE GOVERNMENT CLAIMS ACTRELATING TO ALLEGED DAMAGE AND THE PROPOSED RELOCATION OF A PIECE OF CITYOWNED PUBLIC ART. A COPY OF THE CLAIM IS AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW IN THE CITYCLERK'S OFFICE (CITY)D13.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 12467 BASE LINE ROAD IDENTIFIED AS PARCELNUMBERS 1090331030000, 1090331040000, 1089581040000; NEGOTIATING PARTIES JOHNGILLISON, CITY MANAGER REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ANDJOSEPH FILIPPI, JOSEPH FILIPPI WINERY AND VINEYARDS; REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS.– (CITY)D14.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODESECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE RANCHO CUCAMONGAMETROLINK STATION IDENTIFIED AS PARCEL NUMBERS 020927211, 020914321, AND020927222 AND CERTAIN ADJACENT RIGHTOFWAY INCLUDED WITHIN THE STATIONFOOTPRINT; CITY NEGOTIATOR: JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; NEGOTIATING PARTIES: SARAH WATERSON,PRESIDENT, REPRESENTING DESERTXPRESS ENTERPRISES, LLC, DBA AS BRIGHTLINEWEST; UNDER NEGOTIATION: PRICE AND TERMS OF PAYMENT. – CITYE. RECESS – Closed Session to Recess to the Regular City Council Meeting at 7:00 P.M. in the Council
Chambers at City Hall, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California.
REGULAR MEETING – 7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL:Mayor Michael
Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy
Council Members Hutchison, Scott, and Spagnolo
A. AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDA
B. ANNOUNCEMENT / PRESENTATIONS
B1.Presentation of a Proclamation Declaring the Month of April 2022 as "Donate Life Month".
C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
Members of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor
Agency, and Public Finance Authority. This is the time and place for the general public to address
the Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing
Authority Board, and City Council on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the
Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board,
and City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Fire Protection
District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Council
may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting.
Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the
Mayor, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be
addressed directly to the Fire Board, Agencies, Successor Agency, Authority Board, or City Council not to the
members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected.
Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any
activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting.
The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of the
business portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topic
contained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for these
business items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of the
agenda commences. Any other public communications which have not concluded during this one hour period
may resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed.
CONSENT CALENDARS:
The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and noncontroversial. They will be acted
upon without discussion unless an item is removed by Council Member for discussion.
Members of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, and
Public Finance Authority and may act on the consent calendar for those bodies as part of a single motion with
the City Council consent calendar.
D. CONSENT CALENDAR
D1.Consideration to Approve City and Fire District BiWeekly Payroll in the Total Amount of
$3,530,813.79 and City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers (Excluding Checks Issued to
Southern California Gas Company) in the Total Amount of $8,035,306.01 Dated March 07,
2022, Through March 27, 2022. (CITY/FIRE)
D2.Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers for Checks Issued to
Southern California Gas Company in the Total Amount of $5,739.91 Dated March 07, 2022,
Through March 27, 2022. (CITY/FIRE)
D3.AB 361 Findings for Special Brown Act Requirements for Teleconference. (CITY/FIRE)
D4.Consideration to Accept as Complete, File a Notice of Completion, and Authorize Release of
Retention for the RCFPD Training Center Facility Gas Leak Project (Contract No. FD 2021
004). (FIRE)
D5.Consideration of the Purchase of Dell physical Servers from Sidepath, Inc. in the Amount Not to
Exceed $280,000. (CITY/FIRE)
D6.Consideration to Award a Contract to ConvergeOne, Inc. for Replacement of Library Network
Equipment Under the USAC ERate Program in the Amount of $360,033. (CITY)
D7.Consideration to Approve a Household Hazardous Waste Collection Agreement with the
County of San Bernardino Fire Protection District. (CITY)
D8.Consideration to Declare Surplus for Retired Computers, Monitors, Miscellaneous Equipment
and Vehicles That Have Been Deemed No Longer Needed, Obsolete or Unusable as Surplus.
(CITY)
D9.Consideration to Accept as Complete, File Notice of Completion and Authorize Release of
Retention and Bonds for the EV Chargers at Various Locations Project (Contract No. 2021
109). (CITY)
D10.Consideration to Accept as Complete, File the Notice of Completion and Authorize Release of
Retention and Bonds for the Fiscal Year 2021/22 Local Overlay Pavement Rehabilitation
Project (Contract No. 2021117). (CITY)
D11.Consideration to Adopt an Annexation Map Showing Assessor Parcel Number 110019104
Located at 7878 East Avenue, Which is Proposed to be Annexed Into CFD No. 851; and
Approval to Adopt a Resolution of Intention to Annex Territory Referred to as Annexation No. 22
1 into Community Facilities District No. 851, Specifying Services Proposed to be Financed, to
Set and Specify the Special Taxes Proposed to be Levied Within the Annexation Territory and
Set a Time and Place for a Public Hearing Related to the Annexation. (RESOLUTION NO. FD
2022006) (RESOLUTION NO. FD 2022007) (FIRE)
E. CONSENT CALENDAR ORDINANCE(S) SECOND READING/ADOPTION
E1.Consideration of Second Reading and Adoption of the following:
ORDINANCE NO. 997
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADJUSTING THE
BOUNDARIES OF THE FOUR CITY COUNCIL DISTRICTS AND ADOPTING A NEW OFFICIAL
COUNCIL DISTRICT MAP FOR THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BASED ON THE
RESULTS OF THE 2020 DECENNIAL CENSUS
F. ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING ITEM(S)
G. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM(S) CITY/FIRE DISTRICT
G1.Discussion, Consideration and Possible Action to Introduce, Waive Reading of and Adopt by a Four
fifths Vote, Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 999, Extending for an Additional Year (365 days) through
April 20, 2023, an Existing Moratorium on the Approval of Applications for Building Permits or Other
Entitlements for New Service Station Uses or the Expansion of Existing Service Station Uses in the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, Declaring the Urgency thereof and Making a Determination of Exemption
Under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). (INTERIM URGENCY ORDINANCE NO.
999) (CITY)
H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORT(S)
I. COUNCIL BUSINESS
I1.Consideration of the City Council Community Parks and Landscape Citizens' Oversight
Subcommittee's Recommendation to Appoint Members to the Community Parks and Landscape
Citizens' Oversight Committee. (CITY)
I2.COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS
(Comments to be limited to three minutes per Council Member.)
I3.INTERAGENCY UPDATES
(Update by the City Council to the community on the meetings that were attended.)
J. CITY ATTORNEY ITEMS
K. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
L. ADJOURNMENT
CERTIFICATION
I, Linda A. Troyan, MMC, City Clerk Services Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify
under penalty of perjury that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on at least SeventyTwo (72) hours
prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California and on the
City's website
LINDA A. TROYAN, MMC
CITY CLERK SERVICES DIRECTOR
If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's
office at (909) 4772700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable
arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired.
CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT
“Our Vision is to build on our success as a world class community,to create
an equitable,sustainable,and vibrant city,rich in opportunity for all to thrive.”
Page 4
MayorL. Dennis MichaelMayor Pro TemLynne B. KennedyMembers of the CityCouncil:Ryan A. HutchisonKristine D. ScottSam Spagnolo AMENDED AGENDA(ITEM D14 RECOMMENDED TO BE ADDED TO CLOSED SESSION 4/6/202 210:00AM)CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGAREGULAR MEETING AGENDAApril 6, 202210500 Civic Center DriveRancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARD – CITY COUNCILHOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY SUCCESSOR AGENCY – PUBLICFINANCE AUTHORITYCLOSED SESSION TRICOMMUNITIES ROOM 4:30 P.M.REGULAR MEETINGS COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 P.M.The City Council meets regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in theCouncil Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive. It Is the Intent to conclude the meeting by 10:00p.m. unless extended by the concurrence of the City Council. Agendas, minutes, and recordings ofmeetings can be found at www.cityofrc.us or by contacting the City Clerk's Office at 9097742023. LiveBroadcast available on Channel 3 (RCTV 3).CLOSED SESSION – 4:30 P.M. TRICOMMUNITIES ROOM ROLL CALL: Mayor Michael Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy Council Members Hutchison, Scott, and Spagnolo A. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)C. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTSD. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSIOND1.CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR ROBERT NEIUBER, HUMAN RESOURCESDIRECTOR PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957.6 REGARDING LABOR NEGOTIATIONSWITH THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY EMPLOYEES’ ASSOCIATION (RCCEA), TEAMSTERSLOCAL 1932, EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT GROUP – (CITY)D2.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – PENDING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4)OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V.CHAO PING YANG, SBSC CASE NO.: PENDING. (CITY)D3.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – PENDING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4)OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V.SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON, SBSC CASE NO.: PENDING. (CITY)D4.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – PENDING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4)OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V.KULAR TRUCK LINE, INC., SBSC CASE NO.: PENDING. (CITY)D5.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 9333 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED ASSAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 022916223; NEGOTIATINGPARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND OVERLAND, PACIFIC AND CUTLER,REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON,OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATINGPARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – (CITY)D6.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – PENDING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4)OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V.SCG/DP ETIWANDA LLC, SBSC CASE NO.: PENDING. (CITY)D7.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – PENDING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4)OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V.BTC III RANCHO CUCAMONGA LOGISTICS CENTER LP, SBSC CASE NO.: PENDING. (CITY)D8.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – PENDING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4)OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V.GOODMAN RANCHO SPE LLC, SBSC CASE NO.: PENDING. (CITY)D9.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – PENDING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4)OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V.LIGHTING P.M. LLC, SBSC CASE NO.: PENDING. (CITY)D10.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – PENDING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4)OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V.BCORE IE WEST OWNER LLC, SBSC CASE NO.: PENDING. (CITY)D11.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – PENDING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4)OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V.TOWER OF POWER CORPORATION, SBSC CASE NO.: PENDING. (CITY)D12.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL ANTICIPATED LITIGATION; SIGNIFICANT EXPOSURETO LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (2) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9: 1CASE; THE CITY HAS RECEIVED A CLAIM PURSUANT TO THE GOVERNMENT CLAIMS ACTRELATING TO ALLEGED DAMAGE AND THE PROPOSED RELOCATION OF A PIECE OF CITYOWNED PUBLIC ART. A COPY OF THE CLAIM IS AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW IN THE CITYCLERK'S OFFICE (CITY)D13.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 12467 BASE LINE ROAD IDENTIFIED AS PARCELNUMBERS 1090331030000, 1090331040000, 1089581040000; NEGOTIATING PARTIES JOHNGILLISON, CITY MANAGER REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ANDJOSEPH FILIPPI, JOSEPH FILIPPI WINERY AND VINEYARDS; REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS.– (CITY)D14.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODESECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE RANCHO CUCAMONGAMETROLINK STATION IDENTIFIED AS PARCEL NUMBERS 020927211, 020914321, AND020927222 AND CERTAIN ADJACENT RIGHTOFWAY INCLUDED WITHIN THE STATIONFOOTPRINT; CITY NEGOTIATOR: JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; NEGOTIATING PARTIES: SARAH WATERSON,PRESIDENT, REPRESENTING DESERTXPRESS ENTERPRISES, LLC, DBA AS BRIGHTLINEWEST; UNDER NEGOTIATION: PRICE AND TERMS OF PAYMENT. – CITYE. RECESS – Closed Session to Recess to the Regular City Council Meeting at 7:00 P.M. in the CouncilChambers at City Hall, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California.REGULAR MEETING – 7:00 P.M.COUNCIL CHAMBERSPLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCEROLL CALL:Mayor MichaelMayor Pro Tem KennedyCouncil Members Hutchison, Scott, and SpagnoloA. AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDAB. ANNOUNCEMENT / PRESENTATIONSB1.Presentation of a Proclamation Declaring the Month of April 2022 as "Donate Life Month".C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONSMembers of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, SuccessorAgency, and Public Finance Authority. This is the time and place for the general public to addressthe Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public FinancingAuthority Board, and City Council on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits theFire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board,and City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Fire ProtectionDistrict, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Councilmay receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting.Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by theMayor, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to beaddressed directly to the Fire Board, Agencies, Successor Agency, Authority Board, or City Council not to themembers of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected.Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in anyactivity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting.The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of thebusiness portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topiccontained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for thesebusiness items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of theagenda commences. Any other public communications which have not concluded during this one hour periodmay resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed.
CONSENT CALENDARS:
The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and noncontroversial. They will be acted
upon without discussion unless an item is removed by Council Member for discussion.
Members of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, and
Public Finance Authority and may act on the consent calendar for those bodies as part of a single motion with
the City Council consent calendar.
D. CONSENT CALENDAR
D1.Consideration to Approve City and Fire District BiWeekly Payroll in the Total Amount of
$3,530,813.79 and City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers (Excluding Checks Issued to
Southern California Gas Company) in the Total Amount of $8,035,306.01 Dated March 07,
2022, Through March 27, 2022. (CITY/FIRE)
D2.Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers for Checks Issued to
Southern California Gas Company in the Total Amount of $5,739.91 Dated March 07, 2022,
Through March 27, 2022. (CITY/FIRE)
D3.AB 361 Findings for Special Brown Act Requirements for Teleconference. (CITY/FIRE)
D4.Consideration to Accept as Complete, File a Notice of Completion, and Authorize Release of
Retention for the RCFPD Training Center Facility Gas Leak Project (Contract No. FD 2021
004). (FIRE)
D5.Consideration of the Purchase of Dell physical Servers from Sidepath, Inc. in the Amount Not to
Exceed $280,000. (CITY/FIRE)
D6.Consideration to Award a Contract to ConvergeOne, Inc. for Replacement of Library Network
Equipment Under the USAC ERate Program in the Amount of $360,033. (CITY)
D7.Consideration to Approve a Household Hazardous Waste Collection Agreement with the
County of San Bernardino Fire Protection District. (CITY)
D8.Consideration to Declare Surplus for Retired Computers, Monitors, Miscellaneous Equipment
and Vehicles That Have Been Deemed No Longer Needed, Obsolete or Unusable as Surplus.
(CITY)
D9.Consideration to Accept as Complete, File Notice of Completion and Authorize Release of
Retention and Bonds for the EV Chargers at Various Locations Project (Contract No. 2021
109). (CITY)
D10.Consideration to Accept as Complete, File the Notice of Completion and Authorize Release of
Retention and Bonds for the Fiscal Year 2021/22 Local Overlay Pavement Rehabilitation
Project (Contract No. 2021117). (CITY)
D11.Consideration to Adopt an Annexation Map Showing Assessor Parcel Number 110019104
Located at 7878 East Avenue, Which is Proposed to be Annexed Into CFD No. 851; and
Approval to Adopt a Resolution of Intention to Annex Territory Referred to as Annexation No. 22
1 into Community Facilities District No. 851, Specifying Services Proposed to be Financed, to
Set and Specify the Special Taxes Proposed to be Levied Within the Annexation Territory and
Set a Time and Place for a Public Hearing Related to the Annexation. (RESOLUTION NO. FD
2022006) (RESOLUTION NO. FD 2022007) (FIRE)
E. CONSENT CALENDAR ORDINANCE(S) SECOND READING/ADOPTION
E1.Consideration of Second Reading and Adoption of the following:
ORDINANCE NO. 997
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADJUSTING THE
BOUNDARIES OF THE FOUR CITY COUNCIL DISTRICTS AND ADOPTING A NEW OFFICIAL
COUNCIL DISTRICT MAP FOR THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BASED ON THE
RESULTS OF THE 2020 DECENNIAL CENSUS
F. ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING ITEM(S)
G. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM(S) CITY/FIRE DISTRICT
G1.Discussion, Consideration and Possible Action to Introduce, Waive Reading of and Adopt by a Four
fifths Vote, Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 999, Extending for an Additional Year (365 days) through
April 20, 2023, an Existing Moratorium on the Approval of Applications for Building Permits or Other
Entitlements for New Service Station Uses or the Expansion of Existing Service Station Uses in the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, Declaring the Urgency thereof and Making a Determination of Exemption
Under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). (INTERIM URGENCY ORDINANCE NO.
999) (CITY)
H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORT(S)
I. COUNCIL BUSINESS
I1.Consideration of the City Council Community Parks and Landscape Citizens' Oversight
Subcommittee's Recommendation to Appoint Members to the Community Parks and Landscape
Citizens' Oversight Committee. (CITY)
I2.COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS
(Comments to be limited to three minutes per Council Member.)
I3.INTERAGENCY UPDATES
(Update by the City Council to the community on the meetings that were attended.)
J. CITY ATTORNEY ITEMS
K. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
L. ADJOURNMENT
CERTIFICATION
I, Linda A. Troyan, MMC, City Clerk Services Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify
under penalty of perjury that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on at least SeventyTwo (72) hours
prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California and on the
City's website
LINDA A. TROYAN, MMC
CITY CLERK SERVICES DIRECTOR
If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's
office at (909) 4772700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable
arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired.
CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT
“Our Vision is to build on our success as a world class community,to create
an equitable,sustainable,and vibrant city,rich in opportunity for all to thrive.”
Page 5
MayorL. Dennis MichaelMayor Pro TemLynne B. KennedyMembers of the CityCouncil:Ryan A. HutchisonKristine D. ScottSam Spagnolo AMENDED AGENDA(ITEM D14 RECOMMENDED TO BE ADDED TO CLOSED SESSION 4/6/202 210:00AM)CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGAREGULAR MEETING AGENDAApril 6, 202210500 Civic Center DriveRancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARD – CITY COUNCILHOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY SUCCESSOR AGENCY – PUBLICFINANCE AUTHORITYCLOSED SESSION TRICOMMUNITIES ROOM 4:30 P.M.REGULAR MEETINGS COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 P.M.The City Council meets regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in theCouncil Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive. It Is the Intent to conclude the meeting by 10:00p.m. unless extended by the concurrence of the City Council. Agendas, minutes, and recordings ofmeetings can be found at www.cityofrc.us or by contacting the City Clerk's Office at 9097742023. LiveBroadcast available on Channel 3 (RCTV 3).CLOSED SESSION – 4:30 P.M. TRICOMMUNITIES ROOM ROLL CALL: Mayor Michael Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy Council Members Hutchison, Scott, and Spagnolo A. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)C. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTSD. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSIOND1.CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR ROBERT NEIUBER, HUMAN RESOURCESDIRECTOR PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957.6 REGARDING LABOR NEGOTIATIONSWITH THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY EMPLOYEES’ ASSOCIATION (RCCEA), TEAMSTERSLOCAL 1932, EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT GROUP – (CITY)D2.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – PENDING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4)OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V.CHAO PING YANG, SBSC CASE NO.: PENDING. (CITY)D3.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – PENDING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4)OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V.SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON, SBSC CASE NO.: PENDING. (CITY)D4.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – PENDING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4)OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V.KULAR TRUCK LINE, INC., SBSC CASE NO.: PENDING. (CITY)D5.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 9333 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED ASSAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 022916223; NEGOTIATINGPARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND OVERLAND, PACIFIC AND CUTLER,REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON,OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATINGPARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – (CITY)D6.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – PENDING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4)OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V.SCG/DP ETIWANDA LLC, SBSC CASE NO.: PENDING. (CITY)D7.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – PENDING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4)OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V.BTC III RANCHO CUCAMONGA LOGISTICS CENTER LP, SBSC CASE NO.: PENDING. (CITY)D8.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – PENDING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4)OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V.GOODMAN RANCHO SPE LLC, SBSC CASE NO.: PENDING. (CITY)D9.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – PENDING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4)OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V.LIGHTING P.M. LLC, SBSC CASE NO.: PENDING. (CITY)D10.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – PENDING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4)OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V.BCORE IE WEST OWNER LLC, SBSC CASE NO.: PENDING. (CITY)D11.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – PENDING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4)OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V.TOWER OF POWER CORPORATION, SBSC CASE NO.: PENDING. (CITY)D12.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL ANTICIPATED LITIGATION; SIGNIFICANT EXPOSURETO LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (2) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9: 1CASE; THE CITY HAS RECEIVED A CLAIM PURSUANT TO THE GOVERNMENT CLAIMS ACTRELATING TO ALLEGED DAMAGE AND THE PROPOSED RELOCATION OF A PIECE OF CITYOWNED PUBLIC ART. A COPY OF THE CLAIM IS AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW IN THE CITYCLERK'S OFFICE (CITY)D13.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 12467 BASE LINE ROAD IDENTIFIED AS PARCELNUMBERS 1090331030000, 1090331040000, 1089581040000; NEGOTIATING PARTIES JOHNGILLISON, CITY MANAGER REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ANDJOSEPH FILIPPI, JOSEPH FILIPPI WINERY AND VINEYARDS; REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS.– (CITY)D14.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODESECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE RANCHO CUCAMONGAMETROLINK STATION IDENTIFIED AS PARCEL NUMBERS 020927211, 020914321, AND020927222 AND CERTAIN ADJACENT RIGHTOFWAY INCLUDED WITHIN THE STATIONFOOTPRINT; CITY NEGOTIATOR: JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; NEGOTIATING PARTIES: SARAH WATERSON,PRESIDENT, REPRESENTING DESERTXPRESS ENTERPRISES, LLC, DBA AS BRIGHTLINEWEST; UNDER NEGOTIATION: PRICE AND TERMS OF PAYMENT. – CITYE. RECESS – Closed Session to Recess to the Regular City Council Meeting at 7:00 P.M. in the CouncilChambers at City Hall, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California.REGULAR MEETING – 7:00 P.M.COUNCIL CHAMBERSPLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCEROLL CALL:Mayor MichaelMayor Pro Tem KennedyCouncil Members Hutchison, Scott, and SpagnoloA. AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDAB. ANNOUNCEMENT / PRESENTATIONSB1.Presentation of a Proclamation Declaring the Month of April 2022 as "Donate Life Month".C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONSMembers of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, SuccessorAgency, and Public Finance Authority. This is the time and place for the general public to addressthe Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public FinancingAuthority Board, and City Council on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits theFire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board,and City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Fire ProtectionDistrict, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Councilmay receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting.Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by theMayor, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to beaddressed directly to the Fire Board, Agencies, Successor Agency, Authority Board, or City Council not to themembers of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected.Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in anyactivity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting.The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of thebusiness portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topiccontained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for thesebusiness items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of theagenda commences. Any other public communications which have not concluded during this one hour periodmay resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed.CONSENT CALENDARS:The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and noncontroversial. They will be actedupon without discussion unless an item is removed by Council Member for discussion.Members of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, andPublic Finance Authority and may act on the consent calendar for those bodies as part of a single motion withthe City Council consent calendar.D. CONSENT CALENDARD1.Consideration to Approve City and Fire District BiWeekly Payroll in the Total Amount of$3,530,813.79 and City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers (Excluding Checks Issued toSouthern California Gas Company) in the Total Amount of $8,035,306.01 Dated March 07,2022, Through March 27, 2022. (CITY/FIRE)D2.Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers for Checks Issued toSouthern California Gas Company in the Total Amount of $5,739.91 Dated March 07, 2022,Through March 27, 2022. (CITY/FIRE)D3.AB 361 Findings for Special Brown Act Requirements for Teleconference. (CITY/FIRE)D4.Consideration to Accept as Complete, File a Notice of Completion, and Authorize Release ofRetention for the RCFPD Training Center Facility Gas Leak Project (Contract No. FD 2021004). (FIRE)D5.Consideration of the Purchase of Dell physical Servers from Sidepath, Inc. in the Amount Not toExceed $280,000. (CITY/FIRE)D6.Consideration to Award a Contract to ConvergeOne, Inc. for Replacement of Library NetworkEquipment Under the USAC ERate Program in the Amount of $360,033. (CITY)D7.Consideration to Approve a Household Hazardous Waste Collection Agreement with theCounty of San Bernardino Fire Protection District. (CITY)D8.Consideration to Declare Surplus for Retired Computers, Monitors, Miscellaneous Equipmentand Vehicles That Have Been Deemed No Longer Needed, Obsolete or Unusable as Surplus.(CITY)D9.Consideration to Accept as Complete, File Notice of Completion and Authorize Release ofRetention and Bonds for the EV Chargers at Various Locations Project (Contract No. 2021109). (CITY)D10.Consideration to Accept as Complete, File the Notice of Completion and Authorize Release ofRetention and Bonds for the Fiscal Year 2021/22 Local Overlay Pavement Rehabilitation
Project (Contract No. 2021117). (CITY)
D11.Consideration to Adopt an Annexation Map Showing Assessor Parcel Number 110019104
Located at 7878 East Avenue, Which is Proposed to be Annexed Into CFD No. 851; and
Approval to Adopt a Resolution of Intention to Annex Territory Referred to as Annexation No. 22
1 into Community Facilities District No. 851, Specifying Services Proposed to be Financed, to
Set and Specify the Special Taxes Proposed to be Levied Within the Annexation Territory and
Set a Time and Place for a Public Hearing Related to the Annexation. (RESOLUTION NO. FD
2022006) (RESOLUTION NO. FD 2022007) (FIRE)
E. CONSENT CALENDAR ORDINANCE(S) SECOND READING/ADOPTION
E1.Consideration of Second Reading and Adoption of the following:
ORDINANCE NO. 997
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADJUSTING THE
BOUNDARIES OF THE FOUR CITY COUNCIL DISTRICTS AND ADOPTING A NEW OFFICIAL
COUNCIL DISTRICT MAP FOR THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BASED ON THE
RESULTS OF THE 2020 DECENNIAL CENSUS
F. ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING ITEM(S)
G. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM(S) CITY/FIRE DISTRICT
G1.Discussion, Consideration and Possible Action to Introduce, Waive Reading of and Adopt by a Four
fifths Vote, Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 999, Extending for an Additional Year (365 days) through
April 20, 2023, an Existing Moratorium on the Approval of Applications for Building Permits or Other
Entitlements for New Service Station Uses or the Expansion of Existing Service Station Uses in the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, Declaring the Urgency thereof and Making a Determination of Exemption
Under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). (INTERIM URGENCY ORDINANCE NO.
999) (CITY)
H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORT(S)
I. COUNCIL BUSINESS
I1.Consideration of the City Council Community Parks and Landscape Citizens' Oversight
Subcommittee's Recommendation to Appoint Members to the Community Parks and Landscape
Citizens' Oversight Committee. (CITY)
I2.COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS
(Comments to be limited to three minutes per Council Member.)
I3.INTERAGENCY UPDATES
(Update by the City Council to the community on the meetings that were attended.)
J. CITY ATTORNEY ITEMS
K. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
L. ADJOURNMENT
CERTIFICATION
I, Linda A. Troyan, MMC, City Clerk Services Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify
under penalty of perjury that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on at least SeventyTwo (72) hours
prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California and on the
City's website
LINDA A. TROYAN, MMC
CITY CLERK SERVICES DIRECTOR
If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's
office at (909) 4772700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable
arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired.
CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT
“Our Vision is to build on our success as a world class community,to create
an equitable,sustainable,and vibrant city,rich in opportunity for all to thrive.”
Page 6
MayorL. Dennis MichaelMayor Pro TemLynne B. KennedyMembers of the CityCouncil:Ryan A. HutchisonKristine D. ScottSam Spagnolo AMENDED AGENDA(ITEM D14 RECOMMENDED TO BE ADDED TO CLOSED SESSION 4/6/202 210:00AM)CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGAREGULAR MEETING AGENDAApril 6, 202210500 Civic Center DriveRancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARD – CITY COUNCILHOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY SUCCESSOR AGENCY – PUBLICFINANCE AUTHORITYCLOSED SESSION TRICOMMUNITIES ROOM 4:30 P.M.REGULAR MEETINGS COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 P.M.The City Council meets regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in theCouncil Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive. It Is the Intent to conclude the meeting by 10:00p.m. unless extended by the concurrence of the City Council. Agendas, minutes, and recordings ofmeetings can be found at www.cityofrc.us or by contacting the City Clerk's Office at 9097742023. LiveBroadcast available on Channel 3 (RCTV 3).CLOSED SESSION – 4:30 P.M. TRICOMMUNITIES ROOM ROLL CALL: Mayor Michael Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy Council Members Hutchison, Scott, and Spagnolo A. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)C. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTSD. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSIOND1.CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR ROBERT NEIUBER, HUMAN RESOURCESDIRECTOR PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957.6 REGARDING LABOR NEGOTIATIONSWITH THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY EMPLOYEES’ ASSOCIATION (RCCEA), TEAMSTERSLOCAL 1932, EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT GROUP – (CITY)D2.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – PENDING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4)OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V.CHAO PING YANG, SBSC CASE NO.: PENDING. (CITY)D3.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – PENDING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4)OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V.SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON, SBSC CASE NO.: PENDING. (CITY)D4.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – PENDING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4)OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V.KULAR TRUCK LINE, INC., SBSC CASE NO.: PENDING. (CITY)D5.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 9333 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED ASSAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 022916223; NEGOTIATINGPARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, AND OVERLAND, PACIFIC AND CUTLER,REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON,OWNER; REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATINGPARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – (CITY)D6.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – PENDING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4)OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V.SCG/DP ETIWANDA LLC, SBSC CASE NO.: PENDING. (CITY)D7.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – PENDING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4)OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V.BTC III RANCHO CUCAMONGA LOGISTICS CENTER LP, SBSC CASE NO.: PENDING. (CITY)D8.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – PENDING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4)OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V.GOODMAN RANCHO SPE LLC, SBSC CASE NO.: PENDING. (CITY)D9.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – PENDING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4)OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V.LIGHTING P.M. LLC, SBSC CASE NO.: PENDING. (CITY)D10.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – PENDING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4)OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V.BCORE IE WEST OWNER LLC, SBSC CASE NO.: PENDING. (CITY)D11.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – PENDING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4)OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V.TOWER OF POWER CORPORATION, SBSC CASE NO.: PENDING. (CITY)D12.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL ANTICIPATED LITIGATION; SIGNIFICANT EXPOSURETO LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (2) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9: 1CASE; THE CITY HAS RECEIVED A CLAIM PURSUANT TO THE GOVERNMENT CLAIMS ACTRELATING TO ALLEGED DAMAGE AND THE PROPOSED RELOCATION OF A PIECE OF CITYOWNED PUBLIC ART. A COPY OF THE CLAIM IS AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW IN THE CITYCLERK'S OFFICE (CITY)D13.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 12467 BASE LINE ROAD IDENTIFIED AS PARCELNUMBERS 1090331030000, 1090331040000, 1089581040000; NEGOTIATING PARTIES JOHNGILLISON, CITY MANAGER REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ANDJOSEPH FILIPPI, JOSEPH FILIPPI WINERY AND VINEYARDS; REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS.– (CITY)D14.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODESECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE RANCHO CUCAMONGAMETROLINK STATION IDENTIFIED AS PARCEL NUMBERS 020927211, 020914321, AND020927222 AND CERTAIN ADJACENT RIGHTOFWAY INCLUDED WITHIN THE STATIONFOOTPRINT; CITY NEGOTIATOR: JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; NEGOTIATING PARTIES: SARAH WATERSON,PRESIDENT, REPRESENTING DESERTXPRESS ENTERPRISES, LLC, DBA AS BRIGHTLINEWEST; UNDER NEGOTIATION: PRICE AND TERMS OF PAYMENT. – CITYE. RECESS – Closed Session to Recess to the Regular City Council Meeting at 7:00 P.M. in the CouncilChambers at City Hall, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California.REGULAR MEETING – 7:00 P.M.COUNCIL CHAMBERSPLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCEROLL CALL:Mayor MichaelMayor Pro Tem KennedyCouncil Members Hutchison, Scott, and SpagnoloA. AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDAB. ANNOUNCEMENT / PRESENTATIONSB1.Presentation of a Proclamation Declaring the Month of April 2022 as "Donate Life Month".C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONSMembers of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, SuccessorAgency, and Public Finance Authority. This is the time and place for the general public to addressthe Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public FinancingAuthority Board, and City Council on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits theFire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board,and City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Fire ProtectionDistrict, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Councilmay receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting.Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by theMayor, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to beaddressed directly to the Fire Board, Agencies, Successor Agency, Authority Board, or City Council not to themembers of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected.Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in anyactivity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting.The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of thebusiness portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topiccontained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for thesebusiness items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of theagenda commences. Any other public communications which have not concluded during this one hour periodmay resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed.CONSENT CALENDARS:The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and noncontroversial. They will be actedupon without discussion unless an item is removed by Council Member for discussion.Members of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, andPublic Finance Authority and may act on the consent calendar for those bodies as part of a single motion withthe City Council consent calendar.D. CONSENT CALENDARD1.Consideration to Approve City and Fire District BiWeekly Payroll in the Total Amount of$3,530,813.79 and City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers (Excluding Checks Issued toSouthern California Gas Company) in the Total Amount of $8,035,306.01 Dated March 07,2022, Through March 27, 2022. (CITY/FIRE)D2.Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers for Checks Issued toSouthern California Gas Company in the Total Amount of $5,739.91 Dated March 07, 2022,Through March 27, 2022. (CITY/FIRE)D3.AB 361 Findings for Special Brown Act Requirements for Teleconference. (CITY/FIRE)D4.Consideration to Accept as Complete, File a Notice of Completion, and Authorize Release ofRetention for the RCFPD Training Center Facility Gas Leak Project (Contract No. FD 2021004). (FIRE)D5.Consideration of the Purchase of Dell physical Servers from Sidepath, Inc. in the Amount Not toExceed $280,000. (CITY/FIRE)D6.Consideration to Award a Contract to ConvergeOne, Inc. for Replacement of Library NetworkEquipment Under the USAC ERate Program in the Amount of $360,033. (CITY)D7.Consideration to Approve a Household Hazardous Waste Collection Agreement with theCounty of San Bernardino Fire Protection District. (CITY)D8.Consideration to Declare Surplus for Retired Computers, Monitors, Miscellaneous Equipmentand Vehicles That Have Been Deemed No Longer Needed, Obsolete or Unusable as Surplus.(CITY)D9.Consideration to Accept as Complete, File Notice of Completion and Authorize Release ofRetention and Bonds for the EV Chargers at Various Locations Project (Contract No. 2021109). (CITY)D10.Consideration to Accept as Complete, File the Notice of Completion and Authorize Release ofRetention and Bonds for the Fiscal Year 2021/22 Local Overlay Pavement RehabilitationProject (Contract No. 2021117). (CITY)D11.Consideration to Adopt an Annexation Map Showing Assessor Parcel Number 110019104Located at 7878 East Avenue, Which is Proposed to be Annexed Into CFD No. 851; andApproval to Adopt a Resolution of Intention to Annex Territory Referred to as Annexation No. 221 into Community Facilities District No. 851, Specifying Services Proposed to be Financed, toSet and Specify the Special Taxes Proposed to be Levied Within the Annexation Territory andSet a Time and Place for a Public Hearing Related to the Annexation. (RESOLUTION NO. FD2022006) (RESOLUTION NO. FD 2022007) (FIRE)E. CONSENT CALENDAR ORDINANCE(S) SECOND READING/ADOPTIONE1.Consideration of Second Reading and Adoption of the following:ORDINANCE NO. 997AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADJUSTING THEBOUNDARIES OF THE FOUR CITY COUNCIL DISTRICTS AND ADOPTING A NEW OFFICIALCOUNCIL DISTRICT MAP FOR THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BASED ON THERESULTS OF THE 2020 DECENNIAL CENSUS F. ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING ITEM(S)G. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM(S) CITY/FIRE DISTRICTG1.Discussion, Consideration and Possible Action to Introduce, Waive Reading of and Adopt by a Fourfifths Vote, Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 999, Extending for an Additional Year (365 days) throughApril 20, 2023, an Existing Moratorium on the Approval of Applications for Building Permits or OtherEntitlements for New Service Station Uses or the Expansion of Existing Service Station Uses in theCity of Rancho Cucamonga, Declaring the Urgency thereof and Making a Determination of ExemptionUnder the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). (INTERIM URGENCY ORDINANCE NO.999) (CITY)H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORT(S)I. COUNCIL BUSINESSI1.Consideration of the City Council Community Parks and Landscape Citizens' OversightSubcommittee's Recommendation to Appoint Members to the Community Parks and LandscapeCitizens' Oversight Committee. (CITY)I2.COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS(Comments to be limited to three minutes per Council Member.)I3.INTERAGENCY UPDATES(Update by the City Council to the community on the meetings that were attended.)
J. CITY ATTORNEY ITEMS
K. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
L. ADJOURNMENT
CERTIFICATION
I, Linda A. Troyan, MMC, City Clerk Services Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify
under penalty of perjury that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on at least SeventyTwo (72) hours
prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California and on the
City's website
LINDA A. TROYAN, MMC
CITY CLERK SERVICES DIRECTOR
If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's
office at (909) 4772700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable
arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired.
CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT
“Our Vision is to build on our success as a world class community,to create
an equitable,sustainable,and vibrant city,rich in opportunity for all to thrive.”
Page 7
DATE:April 6, 2022
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
President and Members of the Boards of Directors
FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Tamara L. Oatman, Finance Director
Veronica Lopez, Accounts Payable Supervisor
SUBJECT:Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Bi-Weekly Payroll in the
Total Amount of $3,530,813.79 and City and Fire District Weekly Check
Registers (Excluding Checks Issued to Southern California Gas
Company) in the Total Amount of $8,035,306.01 Dated March 07, 2022,
Through March 27, 2022. (CITY/FIRE)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends City Council/Board of Directors of the Fire Protection District approve payment
of demands as presented. Bi-weekly payroll is $2,098,890.09 and $1,431,923.70 for the City and
the Fire District, respectively. Weekly check register amounts are $7,376,571.16 and
$658,734.85 for the City and the Fire District, respectively.
BACKGROUND:
N/A
ANALYSIS:
N/A
FISCAL IMPACT:
Adequate budgeted funds are available for the payment of demands per the attached listing.
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:
N/A
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 - Weekly Check Register
Page 8
Agenda Check Register
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
Excluding So Calif Gas Company.
AND
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
3/7/2022 through 3/27/2022
Check No.Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount
AP 00013918 03/09/2022 360 DEEP CLEANING LLC 0.00 6,630.00 6,630.00
AP 00013919 03/09/2022 ABSOLUTE SECURITY INTERNATIONAL INC 14,711.39 0.00 14,711.39
AP 00013920 03/09/2022 AIR EXCHANGE INC 0.00 2,392.33 2,392.33
AP 00013921 03/09/2022 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC 12,519.27 0.00 12,519.27
AP 00013922 03/09/2022 BUREAU OF RECLAMATION 873.64 0.00 873.64
AP 00013923 03/09/2022 CALIF GOVERNMENT VEBA / RANCHO CUCAMONGA 33,189.57 0.00 33,189.57
AP 00013924 03/09/2022 ELECNOR BELCO ELECTRIC INC 58,994.92 0.00 58,994.92
AP 00013925 03/09/2022 RCCEA 1,475.00 0.00 1,475.00
AP 00013926 03/09/2022 RCPFA 12,897.99 0.00 12,897.99
AP 00013927 03/09/2022 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 120.00 0.00 120.00
AP 00013928 03/09/2022 SAN BERNARDINO CTY SHERIFFS DEPT 3,723,998.00 0.00 3,723,998.00
AP 00013929 03/09/2022 U S DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 8,362.67 0.00 8,362.67
AP 00013930 03/10/2022 AIRGAS USA LLC 0.00 388.15 388.15
AP 00013931 03/10/2022 BIBLIOTHECA LLC 10,196.04 0.00 10,196.04
AP 00013934 03/10/2022 BRODART BOOKS CO 21,250.13 0.00 21,250.13
AP 00013935 03/10/2022 HOSE MAN INC 77.96 0.00 77.96
AP 00013936 03/10/2022 KME FIRE APPARATUS 0.00 1,577.02 1,577.02
AP 00013937 03/10/2022 LN CURTIS & SONS 0.00 4,439.64 4,439.64
***AP 00013938 03/10/2022 MINUTEMAN PRESS 531.67 861.16 1,392.83
AP 00013939 03/10/2022 OFFICE DEPOT 5,105.78 0.00 5,105.78
AP 00013940 03/10/2022 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC 2,514.34 0.00 2,514.34
AP 00013941 03/10/2022 VISTA PAINT 2,266.61 0.00 2,266.61
AP 00013942 03/16/2022 CALPINE ENERGY SERVICES LP 123,750.00 0.00 123,750.00
AP 00013943 03/16/2022 PROMOTIONS TEES & MORE 4,996.46 0.00 4,996.46
AP 00013944 03/16/2022 RE ASTORIA 2 LLC 80,409.80 0.00 80,409.80
AP 00013945 03/16/2022 RIVERSIDE, CITY OF 6,909.00 0.00 6,909.00
AP 00013946 03/16/2022 SHELL ENERGY NORTH AMERICA 382,093.32 0.00 382,093.32
AP 00013947 03/17/2022 BRODART BOOKS CO 2,533.00 0.00 2,533.00
AP 00013948 03/17/2022 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 361.58 0.00 361.58
***AP 00013949 03/17/2022 EMCOR SERVICES 26,814.75 1,119.25 27,934.00
AP 00013950 03/17/2022 KME FIRE APPARATUS 0.00 7,863.95 7,863.95
AP 00013951 03/17/2022 MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY 522.43 0.00 522.43
***AP 00013953 03/17/2022 OFFICE DEPOT 3,894.46 667.54 4,562.00
AP 00013954 03/17/2022 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC 6,976.89 0.00 6,976.89
AP 00013959 03/23/2022 AHUMADA, ALEXANDER R 0.00 614.88 614.88
AP 00013960 03/23/2022 ALMAND, LLOYD 0.00 232.94 232.94
AP 00013961 03/23/2022 BANTAU, VICTORIA 0.00 456.06 456.06
AP 00013962 03/23/2022 BAZAL, SUSAN 0.00 698.71 698.71
AP 00013963 03/23/2022 BELL, MICHAEL L 0.00 1,577.74 1,577.74
AP 00013964 03/23/2022 BERRY, DAVID 0.00 614.88 614.88
AP 00013965 03/23/2022 BROCK, ROBIN 0.00 1,096.31 1,096.31
AP 00013966 03/23/2022 CAMPBELL, GERALD 0.00 456.06 456.06
AP 00013967 03/23/2022 CAMPBELL, STEVEN 0.00 614.88 614.88
AP 00013968 03/23/2022 CARNES, KENNETH 0.00 456.06 456.06
AP 00013969 03/23/2022 CLABBY, RICHARD 0.00 1,290.56 1,290.56
AP 00013970 03/23/2022 CLOUGHESY, DONALD R 0.00 2,095.76 2,095.76
AP 00013971 03/23/2022 CORCORAN, ROBERT ANTHONY 0.00 714.37 714.37
07:41:17
03/28/2022Current Date:VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page:1
Time:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout
User:
Report:Page 9
Agenda Check Register
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
Excluding So Calif Gas Company.
AND
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
3/7/2022 through 3/27/2022
Check No.Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount
AP 00013972 03/23/2022 COSTELLO, DENNIS M 0.00 2,095.76 2,095.76
AP 00013973 03/23/2022 COX, KARL 0.00 614.88 614.88
AP 00013974 03/23/2022 CRANE, RALPH 0.00 614.88 614.88
AP 00013975 03/23/2022 CROSSLAND, WILBUR 0.00 456.06 456.06
AP 00013976 03/23/2022 CURATALO, JAMES 0.00 1,096.31 1,096.31
AP 00013977 03/23/2022 DAGUE, JAMES 0.00 1,080.65 1,080.65
AP 00013978 03/23/2022 DE ANTONIO, SUSAN 0.00 714.37 714.37
AP 00013979 03/23/2022 DEANS, JACKIE 0.00 232.94 232.94
AP 00013980 03/23/2022 DOMINICK, SAMUEL A 0.00 614.88 614.88
AP 00013981 03/23/2022 EAGLESON, MICHAEL 0.00 1,577.74 1,577.74
AP 00013982 03/23/2022 EGGERS, BOB 0.00 1,080.65 1,080.65
AP 00013983 03/23/2022 FEJERAN, TIM 0.00 1,722.43 1,722.43
AP 00013984 03/23/2022 FRITCHEY, JOHN D 0.00 456.06 456.06
AP 00013985 03/23/2022 HEYDE, DONALD 0.00 614.88 614.88
AP 00013986 03/23/2022 HOLT, DANNY G 0.00 1,263.04 1,263.04
AP 00013987 03/23/2022 INTERLICCHIA, ROSALYN 0.00 232.94 232.94
AP 00013988 03/23/2022 JERKINS, PATRICK 0.00 1,722.43 1,722.43
AP 00013989 03/23/2022 KILMER, STEPHEN 0.00 1,290.56 1,290.56
AP 00013990 03/23/2022 KIRKPATRICK, WILLIAM M 0.00 858.13 858.13
AP 00013991 03/23/2022 LANE, WILLIAM 0.00 614.88 614.88
AP 00013992 03/23/2022 LARKIN, DAVID W 0.00 1,722.43 1,722.43
AP 00013993 03/23/2022 LEE, ALLAN J 0.00 232.94 232.94
AP 00013994 03/23/2022 LENZE, PAUL E 0.00 614.88 614.88
AP 00013995 03/23/2022 LONCAR, PHILIP 0.00 1,546.42 1,546.42
AP 00013996 03/23/2022 LONGO, JOE 0.00 153.53 153.53
AP 00013997 03/23/2022 LUTTRULL, DARRELL 0.00 456.06 456.06
AP 00013998 03/23/2022 MACKALL, BEVERLY 0.00 153.53 153.53
AP 00013999 03/23/2022 MAYFIELD, RON 0.00 614.88 614.88
AP 00014000 03/23/2022 MCKEE, JOHN 0.00 614.88 614.88
AP 00014001 03/23/2022 MCNEIL, KENNETH 0.00 614.88 614.88
AP 00014002 03/23/2022 MICHAEL, L. DENNIS 0.00 614.88 614.88
AP 00014003 03/23/2022 MORGAN, BYRON 0.00 1,968.84 1,968.84
AP 00014004 03/23/2022 MYSKOW, DENNIS 0.00 1,290.56 1,290.56
AP 00014005 03/23/2022 NAUMAN, MICHAEL 0.00 456.06 456.06
AP 00014006 03/23/2022 NELSON, MARY JANE 0.00 153.53 153.53
AP 00014007 03/23/2022 NOREEN, ERIC 0.00 2,095.76 2,095.76
AP 00014008 03/23/2022 O'BRIEN, TOM 0.00 1,577.74 1,577.74
AP 00014009 03/23/2022 PLOUNG, MICHAEL J 0.00 614.88 614.88
AP 00014010 03/23/2022 POST, MICHAEL R 0.00 1,546.42 1,546.42
AP 00014011 03/23/2022 PROULX, PATRICK 0.00 1,096.31 1,096.31
AP 00014012 03/23/2022 REDMOND, MICHAEL 0.00 614.88 614.88
AP 00014013 03/23/2022 ROBERTS, BRENT 0.00 714.37 714.37
AP 00014014 03/23/2022 ROBERTS, CHERYL L 0.00 2,095.76 2,095.76
AP 00014015 03/23/2022 ROEDER, JEFFREY 0.00 1,577.74 1,577.74
AP 00014016 03/23/2022 ROJER, IVAN M.0.00 1,722.43 1,722.43
AP 00014017 03/23/2022 SALISBURY, THOMAS 0.00 614.88 614.88
AP 00014018 03/23/2022 SMITH, RONALD 0.00 456.06 456.06
07:41:17
03/28/2022Current Date:VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page:2
Time:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout
User:
Report:Page 10
Agenda Check Register
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
Excluding So Calif Gas Company.
AND
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
3/7/2022 through 3/27/2022
Check No.Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount
AP 00014019 03/23/2022 SORENSEN, SCOTT D 0.00 1,546.42 1,546.42
AP 00014020 03/23/2022 SPAGNOLO, SAM 0.00 456.06 456.06
AP 00014021 03/23/2022 SPAIN, WILLIAM 0.00 873.31 873.31
AP 00014022 03/23/2022 SULLIVAN, JAMES 0.00 456.06 456.06
AP 00014023 03/23/2022 TAYLOR, STEVEN 0.00 1,878.66 1,878.66
AP 00014024 03/23/2022 TOLL, RICHARD 0.00 6,287.28 6,287.28
AP 00014025 03/23/2022 TULEY, TERRY 0.00 1,577.74 1,577.74
AP 00014026 03/23/2022 VANDERKALLEN, FRANCIS 0.00 614.88 614.88
AP 00014027 03/23/2022 VARNEY, ANTHONY 0.00 614.88 614.88
AP 00014028 03/23/2022 WALTON, KEVIN 0.00 1,722.43 1,722.43
AP 00014029 03/23/2022 YOWELL, TIMOTHY A 0.00 614.88 614.88
***AP 00014030 03/23/2022 AMG & ASSOCIATES INC 12,967.50 416,581.52 429,549.02
AP 00014031 03/23/2022 CALIF GOVERNMENT VEBA / RANCHO CUCAMONGA 24,328.55 0.00 24,328.55
AP 00014032 03/23/2022 CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT 935.76 0.00 935.76
AP 00014033 03/23/2022 RC CONSTRUCTION SERVICES INC 0.00 11,419.00 11,419.00
AP 00014034 03/23/2022 RCCEA 1,453.25 0.00 1,453.25
AP 00014035 03/23/2022 RCPFA 12,778.06 0.00 12,778.06
***AP 00014036 03/23/2022 RICHARDS WATSON & GERSHON 85,726.37 1,334.50 87,060.87
AP 00014037 03/23/2022 SHELL ENERGY NORTH AMERICA 382,093.32 0.00 382,093.32
AP 00014038 03/24/2022 ABC LOCKSMITHS INC 0.00 169.50 169.50
AP 00014039 03/24/2022 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 755.63 0.00 755.63
AP 00014040 03/24/2022 DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 204.66 0.00 204.66
***AP 00014041 03/24/2022 EMCOR SERVICES 12,442.37 973.75 13,416.12
AP 00014042 03/24/2022 GALLS LLC 7,066.02 0.00 7,066.02
AP 00014043 03/24/2022 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 4,544.93 0.00 4,544.93
AP 00014044 03/24/2022 HOSE MAN INC 471.86 0.00 471.86
AP 00014045 03/24/2022 KME FIRE APPARATUS 0.00 478.35 478.35
AP 00014046 03/24/2022 OFFICE DEPOT 5,012.42 0.00 5,012.42
AP 00014047 03/24/2022 PSA PRINT GROUP 0.00 38.79 38.79
AP 00423208 03/09/2022 ABLE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 5,013.75 0.00 5,013.75
AP 00423209 03/09/2022 ABSG CONSULTING INC 2,740.00 0.00 2,740.00
AP 00423210 03/09/2022 ADVANCED CHEMICAL TRANSPORT INC 2,658.50 0.00 2,658.50
AP 00423211 03/09/2022 AFLAC GROUP INSURANCE 24.58 0.00 24.58
AP 00423212 03/09/2022 AFLAC GROUP INSURANCE 3,988.90 0.00 3,988.90
AP 00423213 03/09/2022 AMAZON WEB SERVICES INC 2,551.58 0.00 2,551.58
AP 00423214 03/09/2022 ARS BILLIARDS INC 900.00 0.00 900.00
AP 00423215 03/09/2022 ARTISTIC RESOURCES CORPORATION 1,032.97 0.00 1,032.97
***AP 00423216 03/09/2022 ASSI SECURITY 165.00 2,600.00 2,765.00
AP 00423217 03/09/2022 AUERBACH POLLOCK FRIEDLANDER 1,000.00 0.00 1,000.00
AP 00423218 03/09/2022 BEST OUTDOOR POWER INLAND LLC 302.35 0.00 302.35
AP 00423219 03/09/2022 BISHOP COMPANY 437.28 0.00 437.28
AP 00423220 03/09/2022 BRAUN BLAISING SMITH WYNNE 345.64 0.00 345.64
AP 00423221 03/09/2022 BRIGHTVIEW LANDSCAPE SERVICES INC 31,636.15 0.00 31,636.15
AP 00423222 03/09/2022 C V W D 0.00 958.30 958.30
AP 00423223 03/09/2022 C V W D 175.15 0.00 175.15
AP 00423226 03/09/2022 C V W D 24,464.60 0.00 24,464.60
AP 00423227 03/09/2022 CAL FIRE 0.00 1,120.00 1,120.00
07:41:17
03/28/2022Current Date:VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page:3
Time:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout
User:
Report:Page 11
Agenda Check Register
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
Excluding So Calif Gas Company.
AND
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
3/7/2022 through 3/27/2022
Check No.Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount
AP 00423228 03/09/2022 CALIF EMERGENCY SERVICES ASSOCIATION 0.00 1,198.00 1,198.00
AP 00423229 03/09/2022 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 32.26 0.00 32.26
AP 00423230 03/09/2022 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 342.73 0.00 342.73
AP 00423231 03/09/2022 CalPERS LONG-TERM CARE PROGRAM 177.08 0.00 177.08
AP 00423232 03/09/2022 CCS ORANGE COUNTY JANITORIAL INC 73,194.27 0.00 73,194.27
AP 00423233 03/09/2022 CDW GOVERNMENT INC 6,141.58 0.00 6,141.58
***AP 00423234 03/09/2022 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 4,536.59 6,466.36 11,002.95
AP 00423235 03/09/2022 CINTAS CORPORATION #150 960.23 0.00 960.23
AP 00423236 03/09/2022 CITY RENTALS 3,317.10 0.00 3,317.10
AP 00423237 03/09/2022 CIVIC SOLUTIONS INC 10,385.00 0.00 10,385.00
AP 00423238 03/09/2022 CONSERVE LANDCARE LLC 57,159.26 0.00 57,159.26
***AP 00423239 03/09/2022 CONVERGEONE INC 8,400.00 8,400.00 16,800.00
AP 00423240 03/09/2022 COVETRUS NORTH AMERICA 39.36 0.00 39.36
AP 00423241 03/09/2022 CPR HERO TRAINING CENTER LLC, THE 160.67 0.00 160.67
AP 00423242 03/09/2022 CROWN CASTLE 7,853.00 0.00 7,853.00
AP 00423243 03/09/2022 D & K CONCRETE COMPANY 1,051.64 0.00 1,051.64
AP 00423244 03/09/2022 DAISYECO INC 466.32 0.00 466.32
AP 00423245 03/09/2022 DATA TICKET INC 6,423.45 0.00 6,423.45
AP 00423246 03/09/2022 DELTA DENTAL OF CALIFORNIA 1,116.02 0.00 1,116.02
AP 00423247 03/09/2022 DEPENDABLE COMPANY INC 47.50 0.00 47.50
AP 00423248 03/09/2022 DOUROS, AARON 48.51 0.00 48.51
AP 00423249 03/09/2022 EAGLE ROAD SERVICE & TIRE 2,397.53 0.00 2,397.53
AP 00423250 03/09/2022 ECOHERO SHOW LLC, THE 825.00 0.00 825.00
AP 00423251 03/09/2022 ELANCO US INC 178.89 0.00 178.89
AP 00423252 03/09/2022 EMPIRE ECONOMICS INC 26,975.00 0.00 26,975.00
AP 00423253 03/09/2022 EVERDE GROWERS 3,378.10 0.00 3,378.10
AP 00423254 03/09/2022 EXPRESS BRAKE SUPPLY INC 401.53 0.00 401.53
AP 00423255 03/09/2022 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 31.48 0.00 31.48
AP 00423256 03/09/2022 FITNESS REPAIR SHOP 139.00 0.00 139.00
***AP 00423257 03/09/2022 FRONTIER COMM 2,090.01 525.35 2,615.36
AP 00423258 03/09/2022 FUEL SERV 331.40 0.00 331.40
AP 00423259 03/09/2022 GENTRY GENERAL ENGINEERING INC 15,414.83 0.00 15,414.83
AP 00423260 03/09/2022 GOLDEN GLOBE MANAGEMENT LLC 1,221.26 0.00 1,221.26
AP 00423261 03/09/2022 GOLDEN OAKS VET HOSPITAL 172.05 0.00 172.05
***AP 00423262 03/09/2022 GRAINGER 528.15 254.60 782.75
AP 00423263 03/09/2022 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC COMPANY INC 709.45 0.00 709.45
AP 00423264 03/09/2022 HAAKER EQUIPMENT COMPANY 211.95 0.00 211.95
AP 00423265 03/09/2022 HAULAWAY STORAGE CONTAINERS INC 119.84 0.00 119.84
AP 00423266 03/09/2022 HI-LINE ELECTRIC COMPANY 501.72 0.00 501.72
AP 00423267 03/09/2022 HINDERLITER DE LLAMAS & ASSOCIATES 7,588.96 0.00 7,588.96
AP 00423268 03/09/2022 HUDSON AUDIO WORKS 2,126.99 0.00 2,126.99
AP 00423269 03/09/2022 IMPETT VETERINARY INC 1,080.00 0.00 1,080.00
AP 00423270 03/09/2022 INLAND DESERT SECURITY & COMMUNICATIONS INC 186.00 0.00 186.00
***AP 00423271 03/09/2022 INLAND OVERHEAD DOOR COMPANY 547.00 1,915.00 2,462.00
AP 00423272 03/09/2022 INLAND PRESORT & MAILING SERVICES 219.50 0.00 219.50
AP 00423273 03/09/2022 INSTITUTE OF BUSINESS PUBLICATIONS LLC 265.00 0.00 265.00
AP 00423274 03/09/2022 INYO NETWORKS 11,119.50 0.00 11,119.50
07:41:17
03/28/2022Current Date:VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page:4
Time:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout
User:
Report:Page 12
Agenda Check Register
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
Excluding So Calif Gas Company.
AND
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
3/7/2022 through 3/27/2022
Check No.Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount
AP 00423275 03/09/2022 JTB SUPPLY COMPANY 13,394.65 0.00 13,394.65
AP 00423276 03/09/2022 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN INC 223,064.51 0.00 223,064.51
AP 00423277 03/09/2022 KIM, PAUL 86.24 0.00 86.24
AP 00423278 03/09/2022 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 600.00 0.00 600.00
AP 00423279 03/09/2022 LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS LLC 5,691.50 0.00 5,691.50
AP 00423280 03/09/2022 LI, TIEDONG 1,014.44 0.00 1,014.44
AP 00423281 03/09/2022 LIFE-ASSIST INC 0.00 62.37 62.37
AP 00423282 03/09/2022 LINSCOTT LAW & GREENSPAN ENGINEERS 1,110.00 0.00 1,110.00
AP 00423283 03/09/2022 LISA WISE CONSULTING 14,795.00 0.00 14,795.00
AP 00423284 03/09/2022 LOPEZ, ALBERT 41.63 0.00 41.63
AP 00423285 03/09/2022 LOPEZ, ANGEL 200.00 0.00 200.00
***AP 00423286 03/09/2022 MARIPOSA LANDSCAPES INC 52,790.01 2,503.22 55,293.23
AP 00423287 03/09/2022 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 87.12 0.00 87.12
AP 00423288 03/09/2022 MGT OF AMERICA INC 10,350.00 0.00 10,350.00
AP 00423289 03/09/2022 MIDWEST TAPE 3,879.64 0.00 3,879.64
AP 00423290 03/09/2022 MUNICIPAL EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE ASSOCIATION 275.00 0.00 275.00
AP 00423291 03/09/2022 NAPA AUTO PARTS 0.00 302.93 302.93
AP 00423292 03/09/2022 NATIONAL UTILITY LOCATORS LLC 840.00 0.00 840.00
AP 00423293 03/09/2022 NEXTECH SYSTEMS INC 39,330.74 0.00 39,330.74
AP 00423294 03/09/2022 NORTH NET FIRE TRAINING CENTER 0.00 610.00 610.00
AP 00423295 03/09/2022 NORTH NET FIRE TRAINING CENTER 0.00 4,000.00 4,000.00
AP 00423296 03/09/2022 NUTRIEN AG SOLUTIONS 3,882.08 0.00 3,882.08
AP 00423297 03/09/2022 OC TANNER RECOGNITION COMPANY 2,094.73 0.00 2,094.73
AP 00423298 03/09/2022 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CA 0.00 280.00 280.00
***AP 00423299 03/09/2022 ONTARIO WINNELSON CO 48.33 44.69 93.02
AP 00423300 03/09/2022 PACIFIC UTILITY INSTALLATION INC 30,900.00 0.00 30,900.00
***AP 00423301 03/09/2022 PFM ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC 13,410.82 1,738.99 15,149.81
AP 00423302 03/09/2022 PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 53.36 0.00 53.36
AP 00423303 03/09/2022 PROS CONSULTING INC 9,560.00 0.00 9,560.00
AP 00423304 03/09/2022 RAINBOW BOLT & SUPPLY INC 3,130.36 0.00 3,130.36
AP 00423305 03/09/2022 RANCHO CUCAMONGA QUAKES 13,500.00 0.00 13,500.00
AP 00423306 03/09/2022 RANGEL, PEDRO 3,608.00 0.00 3,608.00
AP 00423307 03/09/2022 ROBERTS, JAELA 73.17 0.00 73.17
AP 00423308 03/09/2022 SAFECHECKS 2,015.42 0.00 2,015.42
AP 00423309 03/09/2022 SAN BERNARDINO CO AUDITOR CONT 11,591.22 0.00 11,591.22
***AP 00423310 03/09/2022 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 15,443.92 12,433.73 27,877.65
AP 00423311 03/09/2022 SAN BERNARDINO CTY AUDITOR CONTROLLER 26.00 0.00 26.00
AP 00423312 03/09/2022 SBPEA 2,413.22 0.00 2,413.22
AP 00423313 03/09/2022 SCOTT MCLEOD PLUMBING INC 5,874.00 0.00 5,874.00
AP 00423314 03/09/2022 SHERIFF'S COURT SERVICES 100.00 0.00 100.00
AP 00423315 03/09/2022 SHRED PROS 183.00 0.00 183.00
AP 00423316 03/09/2022 SIEMENS MOBILITY INC 88,032.10 0.00 88,032.10
AP 00423317 03/09/2022 SO CAL SANDBAGS 3,262.50 0.00 3,262.50
AP 00423319 03/09/2022 SOCIAL VOCATIONAL SERVICES 2,903.00 0.00 2,903.00
AP 00423320 03/09/2022 SOLARWINDS INC 3,774.00 0.00 3,774.00
AP 00423322 03/09/2022 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21,057.97 0.00 21,057.97
***AP 00423323 03/09/2022 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 714.52 1,667.23 2,381.75
07:41:17
03/28/2022Current Date:VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page:5
Time:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout
User:
Report:Page 13
Agenda Check Register
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
Excluding So Calif Gas Company.
AND
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
3/7/2022 through 3/27/2022
Check No.Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount
***AP 00423324 03/09/2022 STANLEY PEST CONTROL 2,150.00 810.00 2,960.00
AP 00423325 03/09/2022 STOTZ EQUIPMENT 196.13 0.00 196.13
AP 00423326 03/09/2022 SUNLUX 609.55 0.00 609.55
AP 00423327 03/09/2022 SUNRUN INSTALLATION SERVICES INC 89.56 0.00 89.56
AP 00423328 03/09/2022 SWANK MOTION PICTURES INC 2,840.00 0.00 2,840.00
AP 00423329 03/09/2022 T & M PARTNERS 5,000.00 0.00 5,000.00
AP 00423330 03/09/2022 TAM, MICHAEL 128.86 0.00 128.86
AP 00423331 03/09/2022 THOMPSON PLUMBING SUPPLY INC 2,647.83 0.00 2,647.83
AP 00423332 03/09/2022 TIREHUB LLC 641.69 0.00 641.69
AP 00423333 03/09/2022 TRIMARK ASSOCIATES INC 2,136.00 0.00 2,136.00
AP 00423334 03/09/2022 TUZZOLINO, SHELI 153.72 0.00 153.72
AP 00423335 03/09/2022 UNITED WAY 45.00 0.00 45.00
AP 00423336 03/09/2022 UNITY COURIER SERVICE INC 1,143.00 0.00 1,143.00
AP 00423337 03/09/2022 UPS 36.00 0.00 36.00
AP 00423338 03/09/2022 US POSTMASTER 265.00 0.00 265.00
AP 00423339 03/09/2022 VELOCITY TRUCK CENTERS 489.57 0.00 489.57
AP 00423340 03/09/2022 VICTOR MEDICAL COMPANY 1,336.75 0.00 1,336.75
AP 00423341 03/09/2022 VICTORIA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 300.00 0.00 300.00
AP 00423342 03/09/2022 VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY 78.03 0.00 78.03
***AP 00423343 03/09/2022 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 4,570.40 425.12 4,995.52
***AP 00423344 03/09/2022 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 4,747.55 173.61 4,921.16
AP 00423345 03/09/2022 WEST COAST ARBORISTS INC 18,964.30 0.00 18,964.30
AP 00423346 03/09/2022 WESTRUX INTERNATIONAL INC 64.58 0.00 64.58
AP 00423347 03/09/2022 WILBUR-ELLIS COMPANY 1,990.87 0.00 1,990.87
AP 00423348 03/09/2022 WILSON & BELL AUTO SERVICE 1,332.01 0.00 1,332.01
AP 00423349 03/09/2022 YUNEX LLC 2,028.00 0.00 2,028.00
***AP 00423350 03/09/2022 ZONES CORPORATE SOLUTIONS 33,261.79 3,121.87 36,383.66
AP 00423351 03/10/2022 CLERK OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS 50.00 0.00 50.00
AP 00423352 03/16/2022 BASELINE SUBWAY INC 20,000.00 0.00 20,000.00
AP 00423353 03/16/2022 POT LEGEND 10,000.00 0.00 10,000.00
AP 00423354 03/16/2022 PRECISION PARTNERS RANCHO INC 20,000.00 0.00 20,000.00
AP 00423355 03/16/2022 SHOKUNIN F & B INC 20,000.00 0.00 20,000.00
AP 00423356 03/16/2022 3SI SECURITY SYSTEMS INC 1,140.00 0.00 1,140.00
AP 00423357 03/16/2022 4 IMPRINT INC 2,302.71 0.00 2,302.71
AP 00423358 03/16/2022 ABDON PLUMBING INC 1,500.00 0.00 1,500.00
AP 00423359 03/16/2022 ADVANCED CHEMICAL TRANSPORT INC 1,963.72 0.00 1,963.72
AP 00423360 03/16/2022 ALBA, CANDACE 2,300.00 0.00 2,300.00
AP 00423361 03/16/2022 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 1,750.00 0.00 1,750.00
AP 00423362 03/16/2022 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 912.90 0.00 912.90
AP 00423363 03/16/2022 ATLAS PLANNING SOLUTIONS 0.00 3,444.00 3,444.00
AP 00423364 03/16/2022 AUFBAU CORPORATION 16,200.00 0.00 16,200.00
AP 00423365 03/16/2022 AUTOLIFT SERVICES INC 351.17 0.00 351.17
AP 00423366 03/16/2022 AVILES, HECTOR 580.64 0.00 580.64
AP 00423367 03/16/2022 B & B GENERAL CONSTRUCTION SVCS 1,417.73 0.00 1,417.73
AP 00423368 03/16/2022 BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, THE 0.00 625.22 625.22
AP 00423369 03/16/2022 BAYONA, JACQUELINE 64.99 0.00 64.99
AP 00423370 03/16/2022 BERON, RHONDA 253.00 0.00 253.00
07:41:17
03/28/2022Current Date:VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page:6
Time:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout
User:
Report:Page 14
Agenda Check Register
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
Excluding So Calif Gas Company.
AND
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
3/7/2022 through 3/27/2022
Check No.Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount
***AP 00423371 03/16/2022 BILL & WAGS INC 385.00 464.06 849.06
AP 00423372 03/16/2022 BOOT BARN INC 355.00 0.00 355.00
AP 00423373 03/16/2022 BRAUGHTON CONSTRUCTION INC 5,000.00 0.00 5,000.00
AP 00423374 03/16/2022 BRIGHTVIEW LANDSCAPE SERVICES INC 34,220.26 0.00 34,220.26
AP 00423375 03/16/2022 BRINKS INCORPORATED 6,722.98 0.00 6,722.98
AP 00423376 03/16/2022 C V W D 170.14 0.00 170.14
AP 00423379 03/16/2022 C V W D 28,881.54 0.00 28,881.54
AP 00423380 03/16/2022 CALIFORNIA STATE CONTROLLER 3,700.00 0.00 3,700.00
AP 00423381 03/16/2022 CALIX INC 6,295.00 0.00 6,295.00
AP 00423382 03/16/2022 CAMBRIDGE SEVEN ASSOCIATES INC 15,341.00 0.00 15,341.00
AP 00423383 03/16/2022 CHAMPION FIRE SYSTEMS INC 0.00 1,350.00 1,350.00
AP 00423384 03/16/2022 CHAVEZ, MORGAN 2,300.00 0.00 2,300.00
AP 00423385 03/16/2022 CHE, SHANG CHENG 69.00 0.00 69.00
AP 00423386 03/16/2022 CINTAS CORPORATION #150 0.00 687.55 687.55
AP 00423387 03/16/2022 CIRCLEPOINT 1,224.68 0.00 1,224.68
AP 00423388 03/16/2022 CITY RENTALS 608.56 0.00 608.56
AP 00423389 03/16/2022 CLIMATEC LLC 1,091.67 0.00 1,091.67
AP 00423390 03/16/2022 CODING MINDS INC 120.00 0.00 120.00
AP 00423391 03/16/2022 CONOR CONSULTING LLC 1,275.00 0.00 1,275.00
AP 00423392 03/16/2022 CORODATA MEDIA STORAGE INC 64.05 0.00 64.05
AP 00423393 03/16/2022 CPS HR CONSULTING 7,065.00 0.00 7,065.00
AP 00423394 03/16/2022 D & K CONCRETE COMPANY 1,913.65 0.00 1,913.65
AP 00423395 03/16/2022 DAISYECO INC 475.59 0.00 475.59
AP 00423396 03/16/2022 DANIELS TIRE SERVICE 0.00 2,398.92 2,398.92
AP 00423397 03/16/2022 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 1,201.00 0.00 1,201.00
AP 00423398 03/16/2022 DIRECTV 253.62 0.00 253.62
AP 00423399 03/16/2022 DIRECTV 100.24 0.00 100.24
AP 00423400 03/16/2022 DOING GOOD WORKS 2,439.35 0.00 2,439.35
AP 00423401 03/16/2022 EBIX INC 1,335.60 0.00 1,335.60
AP 00423402 03/16/2022 ELANCO US INC 181.54 0.00 181.54
AP 00423403 03/16/2022 ELLIS, CHRIS 503.81 0.00 503.81
AP 00423404 03/16/2022 ELLIS, CHRIS 32.00 0.00 32.00
AP 00423405 03/16/2022 ESPINO, MARIO 500.00 0.00 500.00
AP 00423406 03/16/2022 EXECUTIVE DETAIL SERVICES 0.00 340.00 340.00
AP 00423407 03/16/2022 EXPERIAN 52.00 0.00 52.00
AP 00423408 03/16/2022 FABBRI CARTER, STEPHANIE 15,000.00 0.00 15,000.00
AP 00423409 03/16/2022 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 16.42 0.00 16.42
AP 00423410 03/16/2022 FIALLOS, WILSON 2,400.00 0.00 2,400.00
AP 00423411 03/16/2022 FORD OF UPLAND INC 1,787.06 0.00 1,787.06
AP 00423412 03/16/2022 FORTIN LAW GROUP 3,020.50 0.00 3,020.50
AP 00423413 03/16/2022 G/M BUSINESS INTERIORS 45.16 0.00 45.16
AP 00423414 03/16/2022 GATEWAY PET CEMETERY & CREMATORY 390.00 0.00 390.00
AP 00423415 03/16/2022 GENTRY BROTHERS INC 57,136.25 0.00 57,136.25
AP 00423416 03/16/2022 GILLISON, JOHN 200.28 0.00 200.28
AP 00423417 03/16/2022 GLOBAL INDUSTRIAL 0.00 3,888.49 3,888.49
AP 00423418 03/16/2022 GLOBALSTAR USA 154.89 0.00 154.89
AP 00423419 03/16/2022 GRAINGER 392.20 0.00 392.20
07:41:17
03/28/2022Current Date:VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page:7
Time:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout
User:
Report:Page 15
Agenda Check Register
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
Excluding So Calif Gas Company.
AND
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
3/7/2022 through 3/27/2022
Check No.Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount
AP 00423420 03/16/2022 HELLO CRITTER 750.00 0.00 750.00
AP 00423421 03/16/2022 HLP INC 168.35 0.00 168.35
AP 00423422 03/16/2022 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 646.50 0.00 646.50
AP 00423423 03/16/2022 HOYT LUMBER CO, S M 0.00 57.19 57.19
AP 00423424 03/16/2022 HP COMMUNICATIONS INC 500.00 0.00 500.00
AP 00423425 03/16/2022 HR GREEN PACIFIC INC 17,426.50 0.00 17,426.50
AP 00423426 03/16/2022 IDEXX DISTRIBUTION INC 468.87 0.00 468.87
AP 00423427 03/16/2022 IMPETT VETERINARY INC 3,240.00 0.00 3,240.00
AP 00423428 03/16/2022 INLAND PRESORT & MAILING SERVICES 242.02 0.00 242.02
AP 00423430 03/16/2022 J J KELLER & ASSOCIATES INC 2,835.98 0.00 2,835.98
AP 00423431 03/16/2022 JOHNNY ALLEN TENNIS ACADEMY 1,572.60 0.00 1,572.60
AP 00423432 03/16/2022 K-K WOODWORKING 21.53 0.00 21.53
AP 00423433 03/16/2022 KENNEDY EQUIPMENT CO INC 473.05 0.00 473.05
AP 00423434 03/16/2022 KIMLEY HORN & ASSOCIATES INC 17,691.00 0.00 17,691.00
AP 00423435 03/16/2022 KWC ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN 4,069.00 0.00 4,069.00
AP 00423436 03/16/2022 LAI, KRYSTAL 201.42 0.00 201.42
AP 00423437 03/16/2022 LANE, TRAVIS 0.00 320.00 320.00
AP 00423438 03/16/2022 LEISURE COACHWORKS 166.94 0.00 166.94
AP 00423439 03/16/2022 LUEVANO, ANGEL 6,890.00 0.00 6,890.00
AP 00423440 03/16/2022 M2 IMAGE SOLUTIONS INC 4,040.78 0.00 4,040.78
AP 00423441 03/16/2022 MAGELLAN ADVISORS LLC 7,470.00 0.00 7,470.00
AP 00423442 03/16/2022 MARIPOSA LANDSCAPES INC 139,538.95 0.00 139,538.95
AP 00423443 03/16/2022 MARLINK INC 0.00 162.00 162.00
AP 00423444 03/16/2022 MCI 34.93 0.00 34.93
AP 00423445 03/16/2022 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 171.58 0.00 171.58
AP 00423446 03/16/2022 MCPHERSON, SEAN 283.11 0.00 283.11
AP 00423447 03/16/2022 MONTGOMERY HARDWARE CO 572.15 0.00 572.15
***AP 00423448 03/16/2022 NAPA AUTO PARTS 112.49 1,938.46 2,050.95
AP 00423449 03/16/2022 NATIONAL UTILITY LOCATORS LLC 180.00 0.00 180.00
AP 00423450 03/16/2022 NEW COLOR SILK SCREEN & GRAPHICS 362.04 0.00 362.04
AP 00423451 03/16/2022 NG, JIM 100.79 0.00 100.79
AP 00423452 03/16/2022 NINYO & MOORE 20,385.50 0.00 20,385.50
AP 00423453 03/16/2022 NORTH AMERICAN RESCUE LLC 0.00 33.12 33.12
AP 00423454 03/16/2022 NORTH NET FIRE TRAINING CENTER 0.00 800.00 800.00
AP 00423455 03/16/2022 O S T S INC 1,627.13 0.00 1,627.13
AP 00423456 03/16/2022 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CA 2,049.50 0.00 2,049.50
AP 00423457 03/16/2022 ONTARIO SPAY & NEUTER INC 100.00 0.00 100.00
AP 00423458 03/16/2022 ONTRAC 13.71 0.00 13.71
AP 00423459 03/16/2022 ONWARD ENGINEERING 25,700.00 0.00 25,700.00
AP 00423460 03/16/2022 ORTEGA, ILENE 1,873.90 0.00 1,873.90
AP 00423461 03/16/2022 PACIFIC UTILITY INSTALLATION INC 444.00 0.00 444.00
AP 00423462 03/16/2022 PARS 3,500.00 0.00 3,500.00
***AP 00423463 03/16/2022 PINNACLE PETROLEUM INC 3,393.32 2,728.44 6,121.76
AP 00423464 03/16/2022 PIP PRINTING 337.10 0.00 337.10
AP 00423465 03/16/2022 POLLOCK, LARRY 0.00 620.00 620.00
AP 00423466 03/16/2022 POSTAL PERFECT 210.00 0.00 210.00
AP 00423467 03/16/2022 PROHEALTH PARTNERS A MEDICAL GROUP INC 0.00 150.00 150.00
07:41:17
03/28/2022Current Date:VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page:8
Time:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout
User:
Report:Page 16
Agenda Check Register
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
Excluding So Calif Gas Company.
AND
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
3/7/2022 through 3/27/2022
Check No.Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount
AP 00423468 03/16/2022 QUINN, RHONDA 60.00 0.00 60.00
AP 00423469 03/16/2022 R3 CONSULTING GROUP INC 2,350.00 0.00 2,350.00
AP 00423470 03/16/2022 RBM LOCK & KEY SERVICE 99.08 0.00 99.08
AP 00423471 03/16/2022 RCPFA 0.00 547.50 547.50
AP 00423472 03/16/2022 SAFE-ENTRY TECHNICAL INC 0.00 50.00 50.00
AP 00423473 03/16/2022 SAN ANTONIO REGIONAL HOSPITAL 0.00 170.00 170.00
AP 00423474 03/16/2022 SAN BERNARDINO CTY FIRE EMS OFFICERS 0.00 60.00 60.00
AP 00423475 03/16/2022 SBSD EVOC TRAINING CENTER 0.00 2,340.00 2,340.00
AP 00423476 03/16/2022 SHOETERIA INC 894.39 0.00 894.39
AP 00423477 03/16/2022 SHRED PROS 0.00 63.00 63.00
AP 00423478 03/16/2022 SIEMENS MOBILITY INC 134,030.96 0.00 134,030.96
AP 00423479 03/16/2022 SILVER & WRIGHT LLP 0.00 170.60 170.60
***AP 00423480 03/16/2022 SOCAL OFFICE TECHNOLOGIES 3,047.60 603.36 3,650.96
***AP 00423481 03/16/2022 SOUTHERN CALIF FLEET SERVICES INC 2,540.93 9,323.00 11,863.93
***AP 00423486 03/16/2022 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 109,635.65 3,472.85 113,108.50
AP 00423487 03/16/2022 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 215.30 0.00 215.30
AP 00423488 03/16/2022 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 350.43 0.00 350.43
AP 00423489 03/16/2022 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 597.54 0.00 597.54
AP 00423490 03/16/2022 STANLEY PEST CONTROL 700.00 0.00 700.00
AP 00423491 03/16/2022 THE COUNSELING TEAM INTERNATIONAL 0.00 750.00 750.00
AP 00423492 03/16/2022 THOMSON REUTERS WEST PUBLISHING CORP 365.00 0.00 365.00
AP 00423493 03/16/2022 TIANA SANCHEZ INTERNATIONAL LLC 1,125.00 0.00 1,125.00
AP 00423494 03/16/2022 TINT CITY WINDOW TINTING 480.00 0.00 480.00
AP 00423495 03/16/2022 TIREHUB LLC 1,836.07 0.00 1,836.07
AP 00423496 03/16/2022 U.S. BANK PARS ACCT #6746022500 1,008.42 0.00 1,008.42
AP 00423497 03/16/2022 U.S. BANK PARS ACCT #6746022500 19,029.72 0.00 19,029.72
AP 00423498 03/16/2022 UPS 36.00 0.00 36.00
AP 00423499 03/16/2022 VCA CENTRAL ANIMAL HOSPITAL 170.01 0.00 170.01
AP 00423500 03/16/2022 VELOCITY TRUCK CENTERS 0.00 498.82 498.82
AP 00423501 03/16/2022 VELOCITY TRUCK CENTERS 297.47 0.00 297.47
AP 00423502 03/16/2022 VERIZON 24.66 0.00 24.66
AP 00423503 03/16/2022 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 46.32 0.00 46.32
AP 00423504 03/16/2022 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 257.94 0.00 257.94
AP 00423505 03/16/2022 VETS CHOICE RADIOLOGY 158.00 0.00 158.00
AP 00423506 03/16/2022 VICTOR MEDICAL COMPANY 793.62 0.00 793.62
AP 00423507 03/16/2022 VICTORIA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 400.00 0.00 400.00
AP 00423508 03/16/2022 VIRGIN PULSE INC 1,123.20 0.00 1,123.20
AP 00423509 03/16/2022 VISION SERVICE PLAN CA 10,317.44 0.00 10,317.44
AP 00423510 03/16/2022 VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY 150.68 0.00 150.68
AP 00423511 03/16/2022 WALKER, LINDA 1,000.00 0.00 1,000.00
AP 00423512 03/16/2022 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 872.30 0.00 872.30
AP 00423513 03/16/2022 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 3,903.30 0.00 3,903.30
AP 00423514 03/16/2022 WEST COAST ARBORISTS INC 15,954.05 0.00 15,954.05
AP 00423515 03/16/2022 WHITE CAP CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY 181.00 0.00 181.00
AP 00423516 03/16/2022 WILSON & BELL AUTO SERVICE 2,034.42 0.00 2,034.42
AP 00423517 03/16/2022 YOUNG REMBRANDTS 691.20 0.00 691.20
AP 00423518 03/16/2022 YOUNG, KIMBERLY 106.08 0.00 106.08
07:41:17
03/28/2022Current Date:VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page:9
Time:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout
User:
Report:Page 17
Agenda Check Register
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
Excluding So Calif Gas Company.
AND
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
3/7/2022 through 3/27/2022
Check No.Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount
AP 00423519 03/16/2022 YUNEX LLC 2,701.00 0.00 2,701.00
AP 00423520 03/17/2022 INTEGRATELAB BUILDERS INC 10,000.00 0.00 10,000.00
AP 00423521 03/17/2022 RUTH MUSSER LIBRARY 1,000.00 0.00 1,000.00
AP 00423522 03/23/2022 MAGNUSON, PETER 0.00 2,193.58 2,193.58
AP 00423523 03/23/2022 RODRIGUEZ, VICTOR 0.00 614.88 614.88
AP 00423524 03/23/2022 TOWNSEND, JAMES 0.00 2,095.76 2,095.76
AP 00423525 03/23/2022 WALKER, KENNETH 0.00 232.94 232.94
AP 00423526 03/23/2022 ABLE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 5,024.35 0.00 5,024.35
AP 00423527 03/23/2022 ABOVE ALL CONSTRUCTION INC 303.82 0.00 303.82
AP 00423528 03/23/2022 AFLAC GROUP INSURANCE 24.58 0.00 24.58
AP 00423529 03/23/2022 ALL WELDING 875.00 0.00 875.00
AP 00423530 03/23/2022 ALTA VISTA MOBILE HOME PARK 297.59 0.00 297.59
AP 00423531 03/23/2022 AM-TEC TOTAL SECURITY INC 1,382.09 0.00 1,382.09
AP 00423532 03/23/2022 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 1,652.40 0.00 1,652.40
AP 00423533 03/23/2022 ARCHER, SYLVIA 75.00 0.00 75.00
AP 00423534 03/23/2022 AROCHO, ALMA 642.60 0.00 642.60
AP 00423535 03/23/2022 ATLAS FRANCHISE WEST 979.20 0.00 979.20
AP 00423536 03/23/2022 AUTO & RV SPECIALISTS INC 110.92 0.00 110.92
AP 00423537 03/23/2022 BARBARA'S ANSWERING SERVICE 552.00 0.00 552.00
AP 00423538 03/23/2022 BARNES, CASSANDRA 112.00 0.00 112.00
AP 00423539 03/23/2022 BAST, KAROLYN 222.00 0.00 222.00
AP 00423540 03/23/2022 BERLITZ LANGUAGES INC 65.00 0.00 65.00
AP 00423541 03/23/2022 BEST OUTDOOR POWER INLAND LLC 246.33 0.00 246.33
AP 00423542 03/23/2022 BRIGHTVIEW LANDSCAPE SERVICES INC 13,666.92 0.00 13,666.92
***AP 00423544 03/23/2022 C V W D 8,273.42 631.49 8,904.91
AP 00423545 03/23/2022 CA LLC - ALTA LAGUNA MHP 400.00 0.00 400.00
***AP 00423546 03/23/2022 CALIF DEPT OF TAX & FEE ADMINISTRATION 762.34 79.04 841.38
AP 00423547 03/23/2022 CALIFA GROUP 4,931.07 0.00 4,931.07
AP 00423548 03/23/2022 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 416.00 0.00 416.00
AP 00423549 03/23/2022 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 32.26 0.00 32.26
AP 00423550 03/23/2022 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 342.73 0.00 342.73
AP 00423551 03/23/2022 CAMACHO, ADRIANA 2,300.00 0.00 2,300.00
AP 00423552 03/23/2022 CAPITOL ENQUIRY 90.08 0.00 90.08
AP 00423553 03/23/2022 CASA VOLANTE MOBILE HOME PARK 600.00 0.00 600.00
AP 00423554 03/23/2022 CHAMPION FIRE SYSTEMS INC 1,183.20 0.00 1,183.20
AP 00423555 03/23/2022 CHAMPION FIRE SYSTEMS INC 0.00 290.93 290.93
AP 00423556 03/23/2022 CHAPARRAL HEIGHTS MOBILE HOME PARK 300.00 0.00 300.00
***AP 00423557 03/23/2022 CINTAS CORPORATION #150 1,637.64 560.64 2,198.28
***AP 00423558 03/23/2022 CITIZENS BUSINESS BANK 682.50 21,925.34 22,607.84
AP 00423559 03/23/2022 CITY RENTALS 159.00 0.00 159.00
AP 00423560 03/23/2022 CLARK, KAREN 672.00 0.00 672.00
AP 00423561 03/23/2022 CLIMATEC LLC 8,088.50 0.00 8,088.50
AP 00423562 03/23/2022 COVETRUS NORTH AMERICA 684.49 0.00 684.49
AP 00423563 03/23/2022 CURTIS, ZYAIRE 243.70 0.00 243.70
AP 00423564 03/23/2022 D & K CONCRETE COMPANY 3,162.13 0.00 3,162.13
AP 00423565 03/23/2022 DAVENPORT, JAY 0.00 320.00 320.00
AP 00423566 03/23/2022 DELL MARKETING LP 21,421.63 0.00 21,421.63
07:41:17
03/28/2022Current Date:VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page:10
Time:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout
User:
Report:Page 18
Agenda Check Register
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
Excluding So Calif Gas Company.
AND
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
3/7/2022 through 3/27/2022
Check No.Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount
AP 00423567 03/23/2022 DEPENDABLE COMPANY INC 55.00 0.00 55.00
AP 00423568 03/23/2022 EMCOR SERVICES 44,790.20 0.00 44,790.20
AP 00423569 03/23/2022 EXECUTIVE DETAIL SERVICES 0.00 240.00 240.00
AP 00423570 03/23/2022 FIERRO, EDMUND 112.13 0.00 112.13
AP 00423571 03/23/2022 FIRST AID 2000 432.61 0.00 432.61
AP 00423572 03/23/2022 FITNESS REPAIR SHOP 7,540.35 0.00 7,540.35
***AP 00423573 03/23/2022 FRONTIER COMM 1,700.47 1,319.57 3,020.04
AP 00423574 03/23/2022 FUEL SERV 650.00 0.00 650.00
AP 00423575 03/23/2022 G/M BUSINESS INTERIORS 55.34 0.00 55.34
AP 00423576 03/23/2022 GLOBAL SOLUTIONS GROUP INC 18,822.50 0.00 18,822.50
AP 00423577 03/23/2022 GOLDEN OAKS VET HOSPITAL 200.00 0.00 200.00
AP 00423578 03/23/2022 GONSALVES & SON, JOE A 3,000.00 0.00 3,000.00
AP 00423579 03/23/2022 GRAINGER 1,105.36 0.00 1,105.36
AP 00423580 03/23/2022 GROVES ON FOOTHILL, THE 200.00 0.00 200.00
AP 00423581 03/23/2022 HERITAGE WELLNESS COLLECTIVE 1,026.00 0.00 1,026.00
AP 00423582 03/23/2022 HI-LINE ELECTRIC COMPANY 99.70 0.00 99.70
AP 00423583 03/23/2022 HILL'S PET NUTRITION SALES INC 149.34 0.00 149.34
AP 00423584 03/23/2022 HODNICK, CHRISTOPHER 30.00 0.00 30.00
AP 00423585 03/23/2022 HOMETOWN AMERICA RAMONA VILLA 400.00 0.00 400.00
AP 00423586 03/23/2022 HORN, JOAN 107.12 0.00 107.12
AP 00423587 03/23/2022 INTERVET INC 484.88 0.00 484.88
AP 00423588 03/23/2022 JTB SUPPLY COMPANY 559.45 0.00 559.45
AP 00423589 03/23/2022 KING, BRAD 27.68 0.00 27.68
AP 00423590 03/23/2022 LIFE-ASSIST INC 0.00 388.37 388.37
AP 00423591 03/23/2022 LOCKARD, JILLA 49.82 0.00 49.82
AP 00423592 03/23/2022 LOZANO SMITH LLP 1,996.25 0.00 1,996.25
AP 00423593 03/23/2022 MANAGEMENT PARTNERS INC 9,800.00 0.00 9,800.00
AP 00423594 03/23/2022 MARY MCGRATH ARCHITECTS 0.00 7,425.00 7,425.00
AP 00423595 03/23/2022 MATTHEW BENDER & COMPANY INC 62.97 0.00 62.97
AP 00423596 03/23/2022 MEDINA, MARK 24.67 0.00 24.67
AP 00423597 03/23/2022 MEDIWASTE DISPOSAL 86.44 0.00 86.44
AP 00423598 03/23/2022 MIDWEST TAPE 156.02 0.00 156.02
AP 00423599 03/23/2022 MMASC 90.00 0.00 90.00
AP 00423600 03/23/2022 MOLINA, EUGENIA 0.00 108.93 108.93
AP 00423601 03/23/2022 MORA-MONARREZ, GEORGE 825.00 0.00 825.00
AP 00423602 03/23/2022 NAPA AUTO PARTS 9.13 0.00 9.13
AP 00423603 03/23/2022 NBS 22,927.13 0.00 22,927.13
AP 00423604 03/23/2022 NV5 INC 10,598.13 0.00 10,598.13
AP 00423605 03/23/2022 ONTARIO SPAY & NEUTER INC 650.00 0.00 650.00
AP 00423606 03/23/2022 PINES MOBILE HOME PARK, THE 100.00 0.00 100.00
AP 00423607 03/23/2022 PINNACLE PETROLEUM INC 5,024.33 0.00 5,024.33
AP 00423608 03/23/2022 PORAC LEGAL DEFENSE FUND 252.00 0.00 252.00
AP 00423609 03/23/2022 PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 53.36 0.00 53.36
AP 00423610 03/23/2022 PRENTICE, IRENE 22.00 0.00 22.00
AP 00423611 03/23/2022 PRISTINE UNIFORMS LLC 0.00 17.24 17.24
AP 00423612 03/23/2022 PRIVATE BRAND MFG 2,796.12 0.00 2,796.12
AP 00423613 03/23/2022 QUINONES, STEFANIE 148.08 0.00 148.08
07:41:17
03/28/2022Current Date:VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page:11
Time:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout
User:
Report:Page 19
Agenda Check Register
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
Excluding So Calif Gas Company.
AND
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
3/7/2022 through 3/27/2022
Check No.Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount
AP 00423614 03/23/2022 RANCHO SMOG CENTER 224.75 0.00 224.75
AP 00423615 03/23/2022 RED WING BUSINESS ADVANTAGE ACCOUNT 534.82 0.00 534.82
AP 00423616 03/23/2022 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION 2,230.00 0.00 2,230.00
AP 00423617 03/23/2022 SAN BERNARDINO CTY AUDITOR CONTROLLER 26.00 0.00 26.00
AP 00423618 03/23/2022 SBPEA 2,442.02 0.00 2,442.02
AP 00423619 03/23/2022 SCRRA 2,500.00 0.00 2,500.00
AP 00423620 03/23/2022 SHERIFF'S COURT SERVICES 100.00 0.00 100.00
AP 00423621 03/23/2022 SHOR-LINE 711.59 0.00 711.59
AP 00423622 03/23/2022 SHRED PROS 175.00 0.00 175.00
AP 00423623 03/23/2022 SIEMENS MOBILITY INC 59,146.81 0.00 59,146.81
AP 00423624 03/23/2022 SMITH, JENNIFER 2,300.00 0.00 2,300.00
AP 00423629 03/23/2022 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14,866.78 0.00 14,866.78
AP 00423630 03/23/2022 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2,596.89 0.00 2,596.89
AP 00423631 03/23/2022 SYCAMORE VILLA MOBILE HOME PARK 300.00 0.00 300.00
AP 00423632 03/23/2022 TRIDEN GROUP CORP 3,150.00 0.00 3,150.00
AP 00423633 03/23/2022 TYUS, IDA 652.80 0.00 652.80
AP 00423634 03/23/2022 ULINE 165.50 0.00 165.50
AP 00423635 03/23/2022 UNITED SITE SERVICES OF CA INC 323.57 0.00 323.57
AP 00423636 03/23/2022 UPLAND ANIMAL HOSPITAL 1,030.50 0.00 1,030.50
AP 00423637 03/23/2022 UPLAND ANIMAL HOSPITAL 4,365.34 0.00 4,365.34
AP 00423638 03/23/2022 UPLAND ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 0.00 50.00
AP 00423639 03/23/2022 UPS 36.00 0.00 36.00
AP 00423640 03/23/2022 VEIGA, OPHELIA 37.30 0.00 37.30
AP 00423641 03/23/2022 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 5,669.69 0.00 5,669.69
AP 00423642 03/23/2022 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 5,806.97 0.00 5,806.97
AP 00423643 03/23/2022 VICTOR MEDICAL COMPANY 625.22 0.00 625.22
AP 00423644 03/23/2022 VIGILANT SOLUTIONS LLC 1,535.80 0.00 1,535.80
AP 00423645 03/23/2022 VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY 156.06 0.00 156.06
AP 00423646 03/23/2022 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 302.72 0.00 302.72
***AP 00423647 03/23/2022 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 1,137.97 1,236.93 2,374.90
AP 00423648 03/23/2022 WILLOW TREE ACADEMY 1,034.67 0.00 1,034.67
AP 00423649 03/23/2022 WILLOW TREE ACADEMY 1,846.61 0.00 1,846.61
AP 00423650 03/23/2022 WT.COX INFORMATION SERVICES 5,374.37 0.00 5,374.37
$7,376,571.16
$8,035,306.01
$658,734.85
Note:
Grand Total:
Total Fire:
Total City:
*** Check Number includes both City and Fire District expenditures
07:41:17
03/28/2022Current Date:VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page:12
Time:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout
User:
Report:Page 20
DATE:April 6, 2022
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
President and Members of the Boards of Directors
FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Tamara L. Oatman, Finance Director
Veronica Lopez, Accounts Payable Supervisor
SUBJECT:Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers
for Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company in the Total
Amount of $5,739.91 Dated March 07, 2022, Through March 27, 2022.
(CITY/FIRE)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends City Council/Board of Directors of the Fire Protection District approve payment
of demands as presented. Weekly check register amounts are $3,693.25 and $2,046.66 for the
City and the Fire District, respectively.
BACKGROUND:
N/A
ANALYSIS:
N/A
FISCAL IMPACT:
Adequate budgeted funds are available for the payment of demands per the attached listing.
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:
N/A
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 - Weekly Check Register
Page 21
Agenda Check Register
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
So Calif Gas Company Only.
AND
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
3/7/2022 through 3/27/2022
Check No.Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount
***AP 00423318 03/09/2022 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 1,963.12 2,046.66 4,009.78
AP 00423625 03/23/2022 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 1,730.13 0.00 1,730.13
$3,693.25
$5,739.91
$2,046.66
Note:
Grand Total:
Total Fire:
Total City:
*** Check Number includes both City and Fire District expenditures
07:57:22
03/28/2022Current Date:VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page:1
Time:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout
User:
Report:Page 22
DATE:April 6, 2022
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
President and Members of the Boards of Directors
FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Linda A. Troyan, MMC, City Clerk Services Director
SUBJECT:AB 361 Findings for Special Brown Act Requirements for Teleconference.
(CITY/FIRE)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council/Board of Directors of the Fire Protection District make the
following findings in order for the City’s legislative bodies to continue meeting virtually: (1) the
City Council has reconsidered the circumstances of the COVID-19 state of emergency; and (2)
the COVID-19 state of emergency continues to directly impact of the ability of the members of the
City’s legislative bodies to meet safely in person.
BACKGROUND:
On March 4, 2020, Governor Newsom proclaimed a state of emergency to exist in California due
to the spread of COVID-19. This proclamation is still in effect. The Governor subsequently issued
numerous executive orders suspending or modifying state laws to facilitate the response to the
emergency. Among other things, these executive orders superseded certain Brown Act
requirements and established special rules to give local public agencies greater flexibility to
conduct teleconference meetings. The special rules included provisions allowing local public
agencies to conduct teleconference meetings without having to provide a physical location from
which the public may attend or comment; without having to use teleconference locations that are
publicly accessible; and without having to identify teleconference locations on the agenda. Those
special rules expired on September 30, 2021.
On September 16, 2021, in anticipation of then-imminent expiration of his special rules for
teleconference meetings, Governor Newsom signed AB 361. In key part, this bill amends the
Brown Act to establish special requirements for teleconference meetings if a legislative body of a
local public agency makes two findings pursuant to Government Code Section 54953(e)(3). Like
the special rules in the Governor’s executive orders, the special Brown Act requirements in AB
361 include provisions allowing public agencies to conduct teleconference meetings without
having to use teleconference locations that are publicly accessible; and without having to identify
teleconference locations on the agenda. The AB 361 special Brown Act requirements are
scheduled be repealed on January 1, 2024.
In order for a local public agency to be subject to the AB 361 special Brown Act requirements for
teleconference meetings, a legislative body of a local public agency first must make a finding that
it has “reconsidered” the circumstances of a declared state of emergency. Second, there must
be a finding that such emergency continues to directly impact the ability of legislative body
Page 23
Page 2
1
1
9
9
members to meet safely in person. Alternatively, for the second finding, there must be a finding
that state or local officials continue to impose or recommend social distancing measures. These
findings must be made within 30 days after the first teleconference under AB 361 and on a monthly
basis thereafter.
ANALYSIS:
Due to the continuing, rapid spread of the Omicron and Delta variants of COVID-19, staff is
recommending that the City Council make the necessary findings in order to continue holding
teleconference meetings. The findings were first made at the January 5, 2022 City Council
meeting. Federal and state officials continue to recommend social distancing measures, including
limiting in-door gatherings, in order to limit the spread of the highly transmissible Omicron variant
of COVID-19.
It is expected that virtual meetings will only be conducted pursuant to AB 361 where a City Council
Member or other member of a commission/committee is unable to meet in person due to exposure
to COVID-19. Under AB 361, the public must also be given an opportunity to participate in a
virtual meeting via a teleconference option, and the amended agenda provides call-in information.
However, the public will continue to be permitted to attend the meeting in person. It is unclear if
future meetings will require teleconferencing.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact caused by this item. The City already has the necessary equipment to
hold a teleconferenced meeting.
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:
This item will allow Council Members and other commissions/committees and the public to safely
participate in public meetings meeting, if necessary.
ATTACHMENTS:
None.
Page 24
DATE:April 6, 2022
TO:President and Members of the Board of Directors
FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Mike McCliman, Fire Chief
Darci Vogel, Fire Business Manager
SUBJECT:Consideration to Accept as Complete, File a Notice of Completion, and
Authorize Release of Retention for the RCFPD Training Center Facility
Gas Leak Project (Contract No. FD 2021-004). (FIRE)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Fire Board of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District:
1. Accept the RCFPD Training Center Facility Gas Leak Project, Contract No. FD 2021-004,
as complete;
2. Approve the final contract amount of $100,654;
3. Authorize the release of the Faithful Performance Bond 35 days after recordation of Notice
of Completion and accept a Maintenance Guarantee Bond;
4. Authorize the release of the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of $83,204, six
months after the recordation of said notice if no claims have been received;
5. Authorize the Fire Chief to file a Notice of Completion and release of the project retention,
35 days after recordation of Notice of Completion; and
6. Authorize the Fire Chief to approve the release of the Maintenance Bond one year
following the filing of the Notice of Completion if the improvements remain free from
defects in material and workmanship.
BACKGROUND:
On April 7, 2021, the Fire Board awarded a construction contract to Robert Clapper Construction
Services, Inc. in the amount $83,204 for the RCFPD Training Center Facility Gas Leak Project.
Additionally, the City Council authorized a 10% contingency in the amount of $8,320 to address
unforeseen construction related incidentals. A Vicinity Map is included in attachment 1.
The scope of work to be performed consisted of the demolition of approximately 1,100 square
foot of 8” thick paving and rebar removal; compact soil; drill and epoxy dowels; pour new concrete;
installation of a new 3” PE gas pipe; relocation of the existing regulator valve; provide bedding
and 1’ cover for new gas line; installation of new gauges and a pressure relief valve; installation
of a racking system; installation of a tracer wire; and repair and replace the damaged HDPE
confined space rescue training prop.
Page 25
Page 2
1
1
9
6
ANALYSIS:
The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications
and to the satisfaction of the Fire Chief.
The final cost of the construction contract is $100,654, a net increase of $9,130 resulting from
one (1) Change Order, as summarized below:
Change Order No.1: The original scope of work for the repair project called for the relocation of
the existing regulators from the training tower building to the gas vaporizer. However, during the
course of the project it was determined that regulators needed to be located at both the building
and the gas vaporizer in order to properly regulate the gas pressure and prevent a similar
recurrence in the future. As a result, the scope of work for the project was amended to include
the addition of two (2) new regulators. The change in contract cost due to this change order is an
increase of $17,450.
At the end of the one-year maintenance period, if the improvements remain free from defects in
materials and workmanship, the City Clerk is authorized to release the Maintenance Bond upon
approval by the Fire Chief.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The final contract amount for Robert Clapper Construction Services, Inc., Contract FD 2021-004,
is $100,654. The total final project cost, including construction inspection services, is $124,052,
as shown below. Sufficient funds are available in the Fire Capital Fund (3288501-5200) for the
final project cost.
Final Construction Contract $ 100,654.00
Construction Inspection Services $ 23,398.00
Total Project Costs $ 124,052.00
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:
This item brings together portions of the Council’s vision and core value by providing a sustainable
City and promoting a safe and healthy community for all. This is accomplished by ensuring our
Fire first responders have the resources and tools necessary to train for and respond to
emergency situations.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 – Vicinity Map
Page 26
ATTACHMENT 1
PROJECT: RCFPD Training Center Facility Gas Leak Project
Vicinity Map
NOT TO SCALE
Project Site
Page 27
DATE:April 6, 2022
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
President and Members of the Board of Directors
FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Darryl Polk, Director of Innovation and Technology
SUBJECT:Consideration of the Purchase of Dell physical Servers from Sidepath,
Inc. in the Amount Not to Exceed $280,000. (CITY/FIRE)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the City Council/Fire Board approve the procurement and replacement
physical servers with Sidepath, Inc. utilizing current NASPO Value Point agreement with Dell
Marketing, L.P. in an amount not to exceed $280,000.
BACKGROUND:
The City of Rancho Cucamonga hosts multiple applications and file servers in the City’s twin data
centers located at City Hall and the Fire District’s All-Risk Training Center. As part of the 2018
data center rebuild project, DoIT implemented automated backup services using Veeam software
to provide for disaster recovery and operational restoration of files as needed. These backup
services provide automated on-premise, cloud, and immutable cloud storage ensuring
redundancy and accessibility in the event of a catastrophic loss of data. In 2022 the physical
servers that Veeam operates on will reach end-of-life with Dell, Inc. and will need replacement to
continue providing data backup services. As part of the fiscal year 2021/22 budget, the City
Council/Fire Board approved a project to replace these servers before reaching end of life and
end of support.
ANALYSIS:
The Systems team worked the Veeam to develop a sever configuration for hosting Veeam
software as well as storing on-premise back up files for rapid retrieval. The specifications were
provided to Sidepath, a Dell certified service provider that currently provides professional services
to maintain and update the City’s dual data centers. Sidepath provided Quote No. SIDQ37571-07
under the NASPO ValuePoint Agreement on March 15, 2022 to procure, install, configure and
provide multi-year support for two Dell enterprise servers matching the requirements determined
by DoIT and Veeam for a total cost of $274,384. Sidepath is a participating provider under the
California Participating Addendum No. 7-15-70-34-003 to the Dell NASPO ValuePoint Master
Agreement No. MNWNC-108. All agreements are on-file with the City Clerk’s Office and
supporting documentation is on-file with DoIT.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The backup server replacement project is funded in the fiscal year 2021/22 budget for a total of
$280,000 out of Fire District Account No. 3288501-5605 (Fire District Capital Fund) in the amount
of $140,000, and DoIT Account No. 1714001-5605 (Computer Equipment and Technology
Replacement Fund) in the amount of $140,000.
Page 28
Page 2
1
2
1
3
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:
Pre-emptively replacing critical technology infrastructure ahead of end-of-life utilizing the NASPO
ValuePoint agreement directly supports Council’s Core Values of intentionally embracing and
anticipating the future and continuous improvement.
ATTACHMENTS:
None.
Page 29
DATE:April 6, 2022
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Darryl Polk, Director of Innovation and Technology
SUBJECT:Consideration to Award a Contract to ConvergeOne, Inc. for Replacement
of Library Network Equipment Under the USAC E-Rate Program in the
Amount of $360,033. (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council award a contract to ConvergeOne in the total amount of
$360,033 under the USAC E-Rate program for the replacement of network equipment serving
public patrons of the City’s Library system and accept E-Rate Reimbursement funding in the
amount of $194,049 for one-time eligible charges.
BACKGROUND:
In 2016, City Council approved the procurement and installation of upgraded network equipment
at both the Archibald and Biane Public Libraries to provide wireless public internet access utilizing
the Universal Service Administrative Company (USAC) E-Rate program. The E-Rate program
provides discounted pricing and partial cost reimbursement to support public internet access in
K-12 schools, colleges and universities, and Public Libraries. The E-Rate program also provides
federal funding to offset the cost of public internet projects based on a combination of factors
including school district demographic data and square footage calculations of library buildings.
This funding can be received either as a reimbursement or as a direct subsidy of the initial
equipment purchase.
The 2016 project provided high-speed wireless internet access to both City libraries with up to
10 Gbps service, allowing for patrons to bring personal electronic devices or use the library’s
laptops at no cost.
Rancho Cucamonga’s libraries have historically served as centerpieces for learning and
exploration, providing access to media in a variety of forms at no cost to patrons. The past few
years have highlighted the importance of providing high-speed internet access to underserved
and low-income communities in a safe and welcoming environment. Having reliable wireless
internet at both Libraries has become a valued expectation of the community and a lifeline to
access online services for a significant number of constituents.
ANALYSIS:
Much of the network equipment purchased in 2016 is near the end of its service life and requires
replacement to ensure serviceability and support. Utilizing a trusted consulting firm, staff
conducted a procurement solicitation under the E-Rate program to receive quotes for equipment
and services. The most competitive fully responsive bid was submitted by ConvergeOne, Inc. in
the amount of $360,033. Of this amount, the USAC E-Rate program will reimburse $194,049,
resulting in a net cost to the Library in the amount of $165,984.
Page 30
Page 2
1
2
1
2
There were a total of 3 responses to the E-Rate solicitation, with ConvergeOne, Inc. providing the
only fully responsive bid based on the equipment specified. Pricing from ConvergeOne reflected
the applied discount of 80% from manufacturer suggested retail pricing for all equipment that
qualified under the E-Rate program.
All related documents are on file with the City Clerk’s Office and DoIT.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Costs for this project were not included in the FY 2021/22 budget. Staff recommends funding the
project from the Library Capital Fund. The following additional appropriations are being
requested:
1329601-5605/0-3786 (Capital Outlay, Computer Equipment): $194,050
1329601-5605 (Capital Outlay, Computer Equipment): $73,090
1329601-5300 (Contract Services): $92,900
1329000-4745/0-3786 (Other Intergovernmental Reimbursement): $194,050
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:
This project supports Council’s Core Values to provide a nurturing and high-quality life for all by
providing equitable access to high-speed internet for all residents at no cost, and intentionally
embraces the future by investing in critical infrastructure ahead of service interruptions.
ATTACHMENTS:
None.
Page 31
DATE:April 6, 2022
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer
Linda Ceballos, Environmental Programs Manager
SUBJECT:Consideration to Approve a Household Hazardous Waste Collection
Agreement with the County of San Bernardino Fire Protection District.
(CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the attached Household Hazardous Waste
Collection Agreement with the San Bernardino County Fire Department Household Hazardous
Waste Division.
BACKGROUND:
The California Public Resources Code requires cities and counties to prepare a Household
Hazardous Waste Element (HHWE) to identify the safe collection, recycling, treatment, and
proper disposal of hazardous waste generated by households and separated from the waste
stream. In accordance with the resource code requirements, the City of Rancho Cucamonga
(City) established a Permanent Household Hazardous Waste Collection Facility operated by the
Engineering Services Department, Environmental Programs Section.
The City contracts with the San Bernardino County Fire Department Household Hazardous Waste
Division (County) for staff training; program administration, including permitting and reporting; and
for the safe removal and proper disposal of household hazardous waste (HHW). The City is
responsible for providing the facility and trained staff to operate the facility. Additional City
responsibilities outlined in the agreement include: facility maintenance; the safety of the persons
and materials on the property of the facility; keeping the facility secure; and the necessary publicity
and education regarding proper disposal and handling of household hazardous waste to City
residents.
Participation in the county household hazardous waste collection program provides Rancho
Cucamonga residents with the ability to properly dispose of their household hazardous waste at
any of the participating sites within the county. HHW sites throughout the county have a variety
of days and hours of operation, providing added convenience to residents to properly dispose
their household hazardous waste.
ANALYSIS:
Over the last five years the household hazardous waste program has been impacted by increased
supply costs, as well as disposal costs for used oil, used oil filters, household batteries,
Page 32
Page 2
1
1
8
3
pharmaceuticals, and home generated sharps. To cover the increased costs, the County found
it necessary to impose a three percent (3%) increase over the existing annual fees in year one of
the new agreement, followed by a gradual 0.25% increase per year for the remainder of the
agreement term. The total five-year agreement amount is $1,412,758.24. The agreement includes
an annual discount of $13,200 to the City to offset the City’s staffing costs for the Rancho
Cucamonga HHW facility. The annual discount increased by 10% over the discount in the last
agreement term.
If approved, this agreement would be effective from July 1, 2022 until June 30, 2027, unless
otherwise terminated or amended by either party.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The Household Hazardous Waste Collection Agreement is funded by the franchise fee collected
from the franchise solid waste hauler. The total five-year agreement amount is not to exceed
$1,412,758.24. The amounts due to the county annually and billed on a quarterly basis for the
following fiscal years are:
Fiscal Year 2022/2023 $262,538.09
2023/2024 $271,499.58
2024/2025 $281,464.07
2025/2026 $292,513.97
2026/2027 $304,742.53
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:
This agreement meets the City Council Core Value of promoting and enhancing a safe and
healthy community for all residents, by providing a location for hazardous and pharmaceutical
waste, and ensuring that the waste will be collected in a safe manner.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 - Household Hazardous Waste Collection Agreement
Page 33
Standard Contract Page 1 of 7
THE INFORMATION IN THIS BOX IS NOT A PART OF THE CONTRACT AND IS FOR COUNTY USE ONLY
San Bernardino County Fire
Protection District
Department Contract Representative Jose Rodriguez
Telephone Number (909) 382-5401
Contractor City of Rancho Cucamonga
Contractor Representative Linda Ceballos
Telephone Number (909)774-4060
Contract Term July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2027
Original Contract Amount $1,412,758.24
Amendment Amount
Total Contract Amount $1,412,758.24
Cost Center
IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOWS:
HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE COLLECTION AGREEMENT
This Agreement is made and entered into between the San Bernardino County Fire Protection District,
hereinafter referred to as “District” and the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereinafter referred to as the “City.”
RECITALS:
WHEREAS, the California Public Resources Code (Section 47000 et seq.) requires cities and counties to
prepare a Household Hazardous Waste Element which identifies a program for the safe collection, recycling,
treatment and disposal of hazardous wastes which are generated by households in the City or county and
which should be separated from the solid waste stream; and,
WHEREAS, San Bernardino County and each of the cities in the County have developed Household
Hazardous Waste Elements (HHWE) which identify a county-wide cooperative program for the management
of Household Hazardous Waste; and,
WHEREAS, the existing Household Hazardous Waste program operated by the District is consistent with the
adopted HHWE; and,
WHEREAS, the District’s Section of Hazardous Materials, is a section of the District responsible for the safe
Contract Number
SAP Number
Attachment 1
Page 34
Revised 7/15/19 Page 2 of 7
management of hazardous waste; and,
WHEREAS, the City desires for the protection, health and welfare of the public and its personnel, the removal
of hazardous waste from homes so that such materials will pose no danger in the event of fire, the prevention
of potential environmental degradation and the conservation of resources through recycling.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of mutual covenants and conditions the parties hereto agree as
follows:
WITNESSETH:
RESPONSIBILITIES AND DUTIES OF THE CITY
1. The City agrees to operate a Household Hazardous Waste Collection Facility (hereinafter referred to as
“Facility”) for the District at the following location: Household Hazardous Waste Facility, 8794 Lion St.
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730, in accordance with the most recent edition of the District’s “The Satellite
Facilities Operations Manual”, as referred to and amended from time to time in accordance with Section
7 hereof (hereinafter referred to as “Operations Manual”). Employees of the City who have current training
by the District will accept only “Household Hazardous Waste”, as defined in Title 22, section 66260.10 of
the California Code of Regulations and in California Health and Safety Code section 25218.1(e). The
facility will be open to County residents for collection of Household Hazardous Waste at least eight (8)
hours per month, except during inclement weather and City observed holidays. The designated
employees of the City will categorize, pack and label the wastes in accordance with the Operations
Manual. The wastes will be stored in their original packaging (except used motor oil and used antifreeze)
and placed in the District provided containers inside the waste storage area (located within the fenced
area of the Facility). The City approves the Facility’s storage area(s) of ignitable and/or reactive waste
designated by the District. The City approves the Facility’s traffic control which is directed by authorized
staff.
2. The City shall be responsible for maintenance of the Facility, the safety of persons and materials on the
property of the Facility and keeping the Facility secure. It shall not be necessary for the City to require a
person to be present at all times on the site of the Facility where the waste will be stored.
3. The City shall notify and obtain approval from the District prior to making any changes in the maintenance
and/or operations of the Facility. The City shall notify the District of any changes in the management of
the Facility.
4. The City shall publicize to its residents the need to properly reduce, recycle, store, transport and dispose
of Household Hazardous Waste and inform its residents of the availability of nearby household hazardous
waste collection facilities for safe management of household hazardous waste, in the manner and form
recommended by District.
5. The City shall publicize to its residents the maximum quantities of hazardous waste allowed for
transportation which are containers no larger than 5 gallons and maximum quantities of 15 gallons or 125
pounds per trip brought to a household hazardous waste collection facility per participant.
6. The City shall publicize to its small businesses that need to dispose of small quantities of business waste
to contact the District and make an appointment to use the Very Small Quantity Generator (VSQG)
program for proper disposal.
7. The City shall publicize to its residents that home generated sharps containers shall only contain needles,
lancets and syringes with a needle attached that must be completely spent (used and no liquid remaining,
this includes EpiPens). The public may use 2 gallon or smaller heavy-duty plastic household containers
as an alternative to plastic bio-hazard sharps containers. The container should be leak-resistant, remain
upright during use and have a tight fitting, puncture-resistant lid, such as a plastic laundry detergent
container. Containers consisting of glass, metal, cardboard or paper will not be accepted.
8. Agreement Compliance. City agrees to comply with all applicable Federal, State and County laws,
regulations and policies in carrying out its responsibilities under this Agreement.
Page 35
Revised 7/15/19 Page 3 of 7
RESPONSIBILITIES AND DUTIES OF THE DISTRICT
9. The District shall continue to operate a comprehensive Household Hazardous Waste Program
(Program) for the safe collection, recycling, treatment and disposal of household hazardous waste,
including universal waste, Home-generated Sharps (HGS), and pharmaceutical waste excluding
controlled substances. The District program shall be based on a Central Processing Facility and a
regional network of collection centers sited so as to provide safe, convenient service to the public in a
cost-effective manner.
10. The District shall act as the generator and transporter of the Household Hazardous Wastes, and shall
assume responsibility for maintaining the necessary site and transportation permits. Further, the District
will train City personnel and provide the Operations Manual, which designates waste to be accepted,
defines a categorization scheme for wastes anticipated, and specifies emergency procedures to be
followed. The District shall continue to provide an initial 32-hour training course for new Household
Hazardous Waste personnel of the City and subsequent annual 8-hour “refresher” training course for City
Household Hazardous Waste employees. If there are changes to the Operations Manual, written
notification and/or special training sessions shall be provided to the City at least thirty (30) days prior to
their effective date. The Operations Manual shall be consistent with all state and federal regulations
applicable to Household Hazardous Waste facilities and amended as necessary.
11. The District will provide approved waste storage containers, meeting the specifications of the Department
of Transportation for the disposal of hazardous waste and sufficient absorbent materials for “over
packing” the waste containers. At the termination or expiration of this Agreement, all items provided by
the District shall belong to the District, unless otherwise agreed upon in writing. The District will provide
an Emergency Coordinator to offer support and assistance to the City during Facility operating hours
excluding County observed holidays.
12. The District shall remove the household hazardous wastes or independently contract with a licensed
hazardous waste hauler to remove the accumulated wastes, monthly, and to recycle or dispose of wastes
at an approved facility at no additional cost to the City.
13. The District shall provide an annual report to the City, which shall include the amounts and types of waste
collected, participation by jurisdiction, and final disposition of the waste. The report will be provided at no
additional cost to the City.
14. The District shall compile and provide to the California Department of Resources Recycling and
Recovery (CalRecycle), the Department of Toxic Substances Control, and the Certified Unified Program
Agency, the City’s Annual Form 303 Report. The report will be provided at no additional cost to the City.
15. The District shall provide to the City, flyers/brochures/education material that shall be distributed by the
City electronically. Hard copies will also be provided upon request, at no additional cost to the City.
16. The District shall charge any business that disposes of household hazardous waste the actual cost of
disposal as indicated in District’s fee ordinance. For cities or community services districts that operate
their own household hazardous waste collection facility, if business waste is accepted at any satellite
facility, the city or community services district will be responsible for the disposal cost of the business
waste.
Page 36
Revised 7/15/19 Page 4 of 7
17. The District shall provide an electronic biohazardous waste label to every participant that disposes of
home generated sharps. As provided in Paragraph 7, the public may use 2 gallon or smaller heavy-duty
plastic household containers such as a plastic laundry detergent container as an alternative to plastic
bio-hazard sharps containers. The biohazardous waste label shall be placed on the rigid heavy-duty,
puncture-resistant plastic container used to dispose of home generated sharps.
CONSIDERATION
18. In consideration for the services provided, City shall pay the District the following amount not to exceed
$1,412,758.24:
Fiscal Year Annual Amount Amount per quarter
2022/2023 $262,538.09 $65,634.52
2023/2024 $271,499.58 $67,874.90
2024/2025 $281,464.07 $70,366.02
2025/2026 $292,513.97 $73,128.49
2026/2027 $304,742.53 $76,185.63
19. Payments will be due on July 15, October 15, January 15, and April 15 of each year through the term of
the contract. The Annual Amount and Amount per quarter identified in Paragraph 18 includes a discount
to the City of $13,200 annually, ($3,300 quarterly), to assist with staffing cost for the HHW facility.
TERM AND TERMINATION
20. This Agreement shall be effective July 1, 2022 and shall remain in effect through June 30, 2027, but may be
renewed for specified periods, unless, otherwise terminated or amended.
21. Notwithstanding the foregoing, either party may terminate this Agreement at any time upon 90 days prior
written notice to the other party.
INSURANCE AND INDEMNIFICATION
22. City and District are authorized self-insured public entities for purposes of Professional Liability, General
Liability, Automobile Liability and Workers’ Compensation and warrant that through their respective
programs of self-insurance, they have adequate coverage or resources to protect against liabilities arising
out of the performance of the terms, conditions or obligations of this Agreement.
23. District agrees to indemnify, defend (with counsel reasonably approved by City) and hold harmless City,
its officers, employees, agents and volunteers, from any and all claims, actions, losses, damages, and/or
liability arising out of this Agreement from any cause whatsoever, including, the acts, errors or omissions
of any person and for any costs or expenses incurred by City on account of any claim, except where such
indemnification is prohibited by law. This indemnification provision shall apply regardless of the existence
or degree of fault of indemnities. The District’s indemnification obligation applies to City’s “active” as well
as “passive” negligence but does not apply to City’s “sole negligence” or “willful misconduct” within the
meaning of Civil Code section 2782.
City agrees to indemnify, defend (with counsel reasonably approved by District) and hold harmless
District, its officers, employees, agents and volunteers, from claims, actions, losses, damages, and/or
liability arising out of this Agreement from any cause whatsoever, including, the acts, errors or omissions
Page 37
Revised 7/15/19 Page 5 of 7
of any person and for any costs or expenses incurred by City on account of any claim, except where such
indemnification is prohibited by law. This indemnification provision shall apply regardless of the existence
or degree of fault of indemnities. The City’s indemnification obligation applies to District’s “active” as well
as “passive” negligence but does not apply to District’s “sole negligence” or “willful misconduct” within
the meaning of Civil Code section 2782.
In the event District and/or City are found to be comparatively at fault for any claim, action, loss or damage
which results from their respective obligations under this Agreement, District and/or City, as applicable,
shall indemnify the other to the extent of its comparative fault.
Notwithstanding indemnification for any claim, action, loss, or damage involving a third party, District and
City hereby waive any and all rights of subrogation recovery against each other.
Furthermore, if District or City attempts to seek recovery from the other for Workers’ Compensation
benefits paid to an employee, District and City agree that any alleged negligence of the employee shall
not be construed against the employer of that employee.
GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS
24. Representation of the District. In the performance of the Agreement, City, its agents and employees,
shall act in an independent capacity and not as officers, employees, or agents of the District.
25. Change of Address. City shall notify the District in writing of any change in mailing address within ten
(10) business days of the change.
26. Agreement Assignability. Without the prior written consent of the District, the agreement is not assignable
by City, either in whole or in part.
27. Agreement Amendments. City agrees that any alterations, variations, modifications, waivers, or
provisions of the Agreement shall be valid only when reduced to writing, duly signed, and attached to the
original Agreement and approved by the required persons of both City and District.
28. Correction of Performance Deficiencies. Failure by City or District to comply with any of the provisions,
covenants, requirements or conditions of this agreement shall be a material breach of this agreement.
In the event of a non-cured breach, either Party may, at its sole discretion and in addition to
immediate termination and any other remedies available at law, in equity, or otherwise specified
in this Contract:
A. Afford the breaching Party, thereafter, a time period within which to cure the breach, which
period shall be established at sole discretion of the other Party; and/or,
B. Terminate this Contract.
29. Attorney Fees and Costs. If any legal action is instituted to enforce any party’s rights hereunder, each
party shall bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees, regardless of who is the prevailing party. This
paragraph shall not apply to those costs and attorneys’ fees directly arising from a third-party legal action
against a party hereto and payable under INDEMNIFICATION paragraphs.
30. Venue and Governing Law. The venue of any action or claim brought by any party to this Agreement will
be the Central District Court of San Bernardino County Superior Court. Each party hereby waives any
law or rule of the court, which would allow them to request or demand a change of venue. If any action
or claim concerning this Agreement is brought by any third-party, the parties hereto agree to use their
best efforts to obtain a change of venue to the Central District Court of San Bernardino County Superior
Court. This contract shall be governed by the laws of the State of California.
31. Notification. In the event of a problem or potential problem that will impact the level of performance under
this Agreement, the City shall notify the District within one (1) working day, in writing and by telephone.
Page 38
Revised 7/15/19 Page 6 of 7
32. Former County and District Officials. City agrees to provide or has already provided information on former
San Bernardino County and District administrative officials (as defined below) who are employed by or
represent City. The information provided includes a list of former County and District administrative
officials who terminated COUNTY or District employment within the last five years and who are now
officers, principals, partners, associates or members of the business. The information also includes the
employment with or representation of City. For purposes of this provision, “County administrative official”
is defined as a member of the Board of Supervisors or such officer’s staff, County Administrative Officer
or member of such officer’s staff, County or District department or group head, assistant department or
group head, or an employee in the Exempt Group, Management Unit, or Safety Management Unit.
33. Inaccuracies or Misrepresentations. If in the course of or the administration of this Agreement if a Party
determines that the other Party has made a material misstatement or misrepresentation, or that
materially inaccurate information has been provided, this Agreement may be immediately terminated. If
the Agreement is terminated according to this provision, either Party is entitled to pursue any available
legal remedies.
34. Waiver. No delay on the part of either party in exercising any power or right hereunder shall operate as
a waiver thereof; nor shall any single or partial exercise of any power or right preclude any other or further
exercise thereof of any other power or right. No waiver by any party of any right hereunder or of any
default shall be binding upon such party unless such waiver is in writing and signed by a duly authorized
official of such party; and no waiver of any default or failure by such party to exercise any right hereunder
shall operate as a waiver of any other or further exercise of such right or of any further default.
35. Severability. If any provisions of this agreement, or portions thereof, or the application thereof to any
circumstances shall be held invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this agreement and the application
thereof to other circumstances shall nevertheless be valid.
36. Notices and Reports. Any notices shall be addressed to the respective parties as set forth below:
DISTRICT:
Monica Ronchetti
Deputy Fire Marshal/CUPA Manager
Household Hazardous Waste Section
2824 East “W” Street
San Bernardino, CA 92415-0799
CITY: Linda Ceballos
Environmental Programs Manager
P.O. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729
37. Entire Agreement.
A. This agreement is intended by the parties hereto as a final expression of their agreement and
understanding with respect to the subject matter hereof and as a complete and exclusive statement
of the terms hereof and supersedes any and all prior and contemporaneous agreements and
understandings.
B. The signatures of the Parties affixed to this Contract affirm that they are duly authorized to commit
and bind their respective institutions to the terms and conditions set forth in this document.
38. This agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which so executed shall be
deemed to be an original, and such counterpart shall together constitute one and the same agreement.
The parties shall be entitled to sign and transmit an electronic signature of this agreement (whether by
facsimile, PDF or other email transmission), which signature shall be binding on the party whose name
is contained therein. Each party providing an electronic signature agrees to promptly execute and deliver
to the other party an original signed agreement upon request.
Page 39
Revised 7/15/19 Page 7 of 7
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of Directors has caused this Agreement to be subscribed to by the Secretary
thereof, and City has caused this Agreement to be subscribed on its behalf by its duly authorized officers, the
day, month and year written.
FOR COUNTY USE ONLY
Approved as to Legal Form Reviewed for Contract Compliance Reviewed/Approved by Department
Scott Runyan, Supervising Deputy County
Counsel
Date Date Date
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION
DISTRICT
(Print or type name of corporation, company, contractor, etc.)
By
Curt Hagman, Chairman, Board of Directors (Authorized signature - sign in blue ink)
Dated:
Name
SIGNED AND CERTIFIED THAT A COPY OF THIS (Print or type name of person signing contract)
DOCUMENT HAS BEEN DELIVERED TO THE
CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD Title
Lynna Monell, Secretary (Print or Type)
By Dated:
Deputy Address
Page 40
1
1
7
6
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
INITIATED BY:
SUBJECT:
April 6, 2022
Mayor and Members of the City Council
John R. Gillison, City Manager
Cheryl Combs, Procurement Technician
Consideration to Declare Surplus for Retired Computers, Monitors,
Miscellaneous Equipment and Vehicles That Have Been Deemed No
Longer Needed, Obsolete or Unusable as Surplus. (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council approve to declare the listed computers, monitors,
miscellaneous equipment, and vehicles items that have been deemed no longer needed, obsolete
or unusable as surplus.
BACKGROUND:
The City Council has provided authorization to the Procurement Manager request to dispose of City
items that have been deemed as obsolete and unsuitable for City use. Methods for disposing of
surplus are to exchange for or trade in on new supplies, transfer to another department, or offer
for sale on a competitive bid basis. After a reasonable effort, and if no bids have been received,
Procurement may dispose of surplus for the highest scrap value. The City may sell surplus property
to any other governmental agency at a fair market value without any other bids or donate surplus
property to any agency or entity which is exempt from federal income tax, with the approval of
City Council.
ANALYSIS:
The items to be considered for surplus at this time were submitted by the Department of
Innovation and Technology and Public Works. Proposed surplus items include computers,
monitors, miscellaneous equipment and vehicles deemed no longer needed, obsolete or
unusable. Staff recommends Council approve the disposal of these items through auction or best
method as determined by the Procurement Manager.
FISCAL IMPACT:
In FY 20/21 the total surplus amount sold was $37,489. To date, in FY 21/22, surplus has
accumulated $50,522 in sales through the Public Surplus auction site.
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:
Reusing and recycling items supports Council's core vale of intentionally embracing and
anticipating the future by effectively disposing of surplus assets.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 - Surplus Log 04062022
Page 41
F/A No. Description Make/Model Serial No.
COMPUTER EQUIPMENT
5218 HP COMPUTER 6300 MXL3300887
5057 HP COMPUTER 6300 MXL330089Q
5053 HP COMPUTER 6300 MXL3300851
5058 HP COMPUTER 6300 MXL330089R
5061 HP COMPUTER 6300 MXL3300885
5219 HP COMPUTER 6300 MXL33008CS
5056 HP COMPUTER 6300 MXL3300828
5039 HP COMPUTER 6300 MXL33007XH
5059 HP COMPUTER 6300 MXL33008BR
5232 HP COMPUTER 6300 MXL33008DM
5058 HP COMPUTER 6300 MXL3300867
5088 HP COMPUTER 6300 MXL330087C
4439 HP COMPUTER Z420 2UA2390V7P
5215 HP COMPUTER 6300 MXL33008D2
5233 HP COMPUTER 6300 MXL33008D1
5191 HP COMPUTER 6300 MXL33008C7
5213 HP COMPUTER 6300 MXL330088S
5305 HP COMPUTER 6300 MXL33007XZ
4480 HP COMPUTER Z420 2UA2480XDW
5090 HP COMPUTER 6300 MXL3300830
4386 LENOVO COMPUTER M19P MGBBGWE
4387 LENOVO COMPUTER M19P MJBBGWH
4205 INTEL COMPUTER DC53427HYE G6YE41700VS
N/A APPLE IPAD A1416 DMPJ5YZGDJ8R
2949 IBM COMPUTER 2CPU 45448859438
5089 HP COMPUTER 6300 MXL330087D
5954 HP COMPUTER 6300 MXL33008CQ
5080 HP COMPUTER 6300 MXL33008BM
4385 LENOVO COMPUTER ABU MJBBGVY
4304 LENOVO COMPUTER CTO MJGFVW9
5077 HP COMPUTER 6300 MXL33007X4
5084 HP COMPUTER 6300 MXL330084N
5087 HP COMPUTER 6300 MXL33007XM
5078 HP COMPUTER 6300 MXL330088R
5076 HP COMPUTER 6300 MXL33007WX
4308 LENOVO COMPUTER 2516 R8-D050T
4309 LENOVO COMPUTER 2516 R8-D050P
4313 LENOVO COMPUTER 2516 R8-D050M
4310 LENOVO COMPUTER 2516 R8-D050R
4312 LENOVO COMPUTER 2516 R8-D050N
4307 LENOVO COMPUTER 2516 R8-D050W
ATTACHMENT 1Page42
4311 LENOVO COMPUTER 2516 R8-D050V
5086 HP COMPUTER 6300 MXL3300896
5221 HP COMPUTER 6300 MXL330089J
5312 HP COMPUTER 6300 MXL330088G
4818 HP COMPUTER 6300 MXL33007XD
6159 LENOVO COMPUTER 002BUS PC0E0WUZ
4364 HP COMPUTER 6200 MXL15208VX
4468 HP COMPUTER 6200 MXL224177L
4871 HP COMPUTER 6300 MXL330085J
4753 HP COMPUTER 6300 MXL3300877
5210 HP COMPUTER 6300 MXL3292S5F
6160 LENOVO COMPUTER 002BUS SPC0E0XMW
4460 DELL COMPUTER E6420 81F1VL1
4457 DELL COMPUTER E6420 N/A
4463 DELL COMPUTER E6420 FLH1LV1
4943 HP COMPUTER 6300 MXL330089F
4710 HP COMPUTER 6300 MXL330089H
4762 HP COMPUTER 6300 MXL33007Z4
4783 HP COMPUTER 6300 MXL330080P
5374 HP COMPUTER 600 MXL4281GZH
4662 DELL COMPUTER D04S 4YCNTW1
5536 ASUS COMPUTER X18-82072 000186-236-267771
4407 KINDLE TABLET D01400 ZEV1229
4405 KINDLE TABLET D01200 ZEE-1013
4414 SONY TABLET PRS-T1 1298069
4403 B&N TABLET XHHBNTV250 8961A
4705 HP COMPUTER 6300 MXL3300872
5055 HP COMPUTER 6300 MXL330083Z
5255 HP COMPUTER 6300 MXL330088M
5239 HP COMPUTER 6300 MXL33008BZ
4443 HP COMPUTER Z220 MXL224177T
5316 HP COMPUTER Z220 2UA33115QM
4461 DELL COMPUTER E6420 2HR1LV1
4458 DELL COMPUTER E6420 BGQ0LV1
PABCB11 CHROME COMPUTER XE550C22 HT4L91KC800174Y
4963 HP COMPUTER Z420 2UA3291WF9
4956 HP COMPUTER Z420 2UVA3291WF8
4534 CHROME COMPUTER XE550C22 HT4L91KC705922T
4513 CHROME COMPUTER XE550C22 HT4L9IKC800592Z
5185 HP COMPUTER 6300 MXL33008BY
4361 HP COMPUTER 6200 MXL5208VR
4473 HP COMPUTER 6200 MXL224177Y
5214 HP COMPUTER 6300 MXL330088N
Page 43
5216 HP COMPUTER 6300 MXL33008D0
4433 HP COMPUTER 6200 MXL2321091
4465 HP COMPUTER 6200 MXL224177M
5317 HP COMPUTER Z220 2UA3315QR
5773 SUPERMICRO COMPUTER N/A 109587005
5229 HP COMPUTER 6300 MXL330088P
5193 HP COMPUTER 6300 MXL33008C4
4767 HP COMPUTER 6300 MXL3300832
5715 HP COMPUTER 800 MXL5381G8T
4538 HP COMPUTER Z220 2UVA4529Y6
4475 HP COMPUTER 6200 MXL224177K
4467 HP COMPUTER 6200 MXL2241780
4465 HP COMPUTER 6200 MXL2241777M
5234 HP COMPUTER 6300 MXL3300888
N/A ASUS COMPUTER P1-PH1 X1145391
5472 DELL COMPUTER D07S 5HTMD22
5486 HP COMPUTER 400 MXL5261ZPS
5799 HP COMPUTER 400 MXL6372NSY
5238 HP COMPUTER 6300 MXL330088B
5714 HP COMPUTER 800 MXL5381G96
5796 HP COMPUTER 400 MXL6372P0D
5168 HP COMPUTER 6300 MXL330082P
5217 HP COMPUTER 6300 MXL33008D4
5231 HP COMPUTER 6300 MXL33008D3
5237 HP COMPUTER 6300 MXL33008D5
5092 HP COMPUTER 6300 MXL330082V
5082 HP COMPUTER 6300 MXL330088G
4743 HP COMPUTER 6300 MXL3300847
5224 HP COMPUTER 6300 MXL33008CM
5081 HP COMPUTER 6300 XL3300879
5036 HP COMPUTER 6300 MXL33008B5
5227 HP COMPUTER 6300 MXL33008DW
5240 HP COMPUTER 6300 MXL33008CY
5091 HP COMPUTER 6300 MXL33007WV
5083 HP COMPUTER 6300 MXL3300879
4673 DELL COMPUTER D04S 4Y9MTW1
4651 DELL COMPUTER D04S 4YBPTW1
4672 DELL COMPUTER D04S 4Y8NTW1
4392 DELL COMPUTER D12M 3L23YR1
5376 HP COMPUTER 6300 MXL4281GZK
5245 HP COMPUTER 6300 MXL330082B
1330 LENOVO MONITOR 9419-HC2 VLY2089
N/A LENOVO MONITOR 9419-HC2 VLDL905
Page 44
4705 LENOVO MONITOR 9419-HC2 VLDM415
4811 LENOVO MONITOR 9418HC2 VLDM225
632 HP MONITOR LA2006 CNC1450YKN
1596 LENOVO MONITOR 2572-HD6 V8-V5057
1587 LENOVO MONITOR 2448-HB6 V6-71714
1327 IBM MONITOR 6636-HB1 V1D6051
1362 IBM MONITOR 6636-HB1 V2-W1452
1590 IBM MONITOR 6636-HB1 V1D6D42
4800 IBM MONITOR 6636HB1 V6-62015
1514 IBM MONITOR 6636HB1 V2-V644
5609 IBM MONITOR 6636HB1 V6-62034
4839 IBM MONITOR 6636HB1 V1D5800
1581 LENOVO MONITOR 9419-1C62 VLDM269
1520 IBM MONITOR 6636HB1 VLD5806
NA LENOVO MONITOR 9419-HC2 9429-HC2
1433 LENOVO MONITOR 9419-HC2 VLDM228
N/A LENOVO MONITOR 9419HC2 VLDM299
1516 LENOVO MONITOR 9417-AB1 V2Y1092
1667 LENOVO MONITOR 9148-HC2 VLDM349
N/A IBM MONITOR 9417AB1 V2V7735
1363 IBM MONITOR 9405-AB6 V6-62025
1361 IBM MONITOR 9407-AB1 V2W1456
5230 LENOVO MONITOR L190XC VLVC887
1360 IBM MONITOR 9417AB1 V2V24984
N/A LENOVO MONITOR 9417AB1 VDLM285
N/A IBM MONITOR 9417AB1 V661982
N/A LENOVO MONITOR 9417HC2 VLDM174
N/A LENOVO MONITOR 9220 V08596
1602 LENOVO MONITOR 9419HC2 VDLM333
5029 HP COMPUTER A1L16AV 5CB3290C82
4679 HP COMPUTER A1L16AV 5CB3380WTL
4719 HP COMPUTER 6470B CNU332C73P
5056 HP COMPUTER 6470B CNU332C765
5063 HP COMPUTER 6470B CNU332780
5047 HP COMPUTER 6470B CNU332C75S
5035 HP COMPUTER 6470B CNU332C73M
4701 HP COMPUTER 6470B CNU332C7BG
5069 HP COMPUTER 6470B CNU332C75Z
5066 HP COMPUTER 6470B CNU332C763
5382 HP COMPUTER D9R52AV 5CG427D0M5
5379 HP COMPUTER D9R52AV ECG426JMW0
5472 HP COMPUTER D07S 11961588890
933 IBM COMPUTER 2687 29R7077
Page 45
5380 HP COMPUTER D9R52AV 5CG426JMVL
4343 DELL COMPUTER P15G 7KM8DS1
3517 APPLE COMPUTER A1286 N/A
3518 APPLE COMPUTER A1286 N/A
1513 IBM MONITOR 9417-AB1 V2V3576
N/A IBM MONITOR 4943-17U 23M2643
1497 IBM MONITOR 9205AB6 V662078
4801 IBM MONITOR 925AB6 V662026
1495 IBM MONITOR 6636HV1 VD15828
1515 IBM MONITOR 9417AB1 V2V3578
1494 IBM MONITOR 6636HB1 V1D6531
1518 IBM MONITOR 9417AB1 V1D198
N/A TATAUM MONITOR TS17RM S069409030038
IS00648 CANON PRINTER MNX342 CIJFA10BK10375
N/A IBM MONITOR 9205AB6 V662003
N/A IBM RECIPT MAKER WTP-100II SW07065894
N/A BROTHER FAX FAX2820 U61325L1N172372
3561
PANASONIC TOUGHBOOK COMPUTER
CF30 7EKYA34567
3560
PANASONIC TOUGHBOOK COMPUTER
CF30 7EKYA34797
3533
PANASONIC TOUGHBOOK COMPUTER
CF30 7GKYA54723
4158
PANASONIC TOUGHBOOK COMPUTER
CF19 9DKYA69411
4641
PANASONIC TOUGHBOOK COMPUTER
CF19 3IKYB42979
4460
PANASONIC TOUGHBOOK COMPUTER
CF19 9DKYA70090
CONFIRE
02410
PANASONIC TOUGHBOOK COMPUTER
CF19 9KKSA23806
CONFIRE
02413
PANASONIC TOUGHBOOK COMPUTER
CF19 9JKSA19867
CONFIRE
02405
PANASONIC TOUGHBOOK COMPUTER
CF19 9JKSA19726
4164
PANASONIC TOUGHBOOK COMPUTER
CF19 9DKYA70032
5745
PANASONIC TOUGHBOOK COMPUTER
CF19 6AKSA49431
5549
PANASONIC TOUGHBOOK COMPUTER
CF19 4JKYA01895
4165
PANASONIC TOUGHBOOK COMPUTER
CF19 9DKYA69609
4639
PANASONIC TOUGHBOOK COMPUTER
CF19 3IKYB43535
Page 46
4642
PANASONIC TOUGHBOOK COMPUTER
CF19 3IKYB43558
5450
PANASONIC TOUGHBOOK COMPUTER
CF19 4JKYA02001
4155
PANASONIC TOUGHBOOK COMPUTER
CF19 9DKYA70025
4647
PANASONIC TOUGHBOOK COMPUTER
CF19 3EKYB26453
4169
PANASONIC TOUGHBOOK COMPUTER
CF19 9DKYA70009
4640
PANASONIC TOUGHBOOK COMPUTER
CF19 3IKYB43492
CONFIRE
02414
PANASONIC TOUGHBOOK COMPUTER
CF19 9JKSA19850
5447
PANASONIC TOUGHBOOK COMPUTER
CF19 4JKYA01908
SB-Z061628 FUJTISU COMPUTER FPCPR197PA DF3512282
4496 APPLE IPAD A1459 DMPJNFA9F188
4593 APPLE IPAD A4160 DMPJ70P021KD
4436 APPLE IPAD A1403 DMPJ70P0DNQB
4435 APPLE IPAD A1403 DMPJ07WYDNQV
4434 APPLE IPAD A1403 DMPJ63DRDNQV
4484 HP COMPUTER Z420 2UA2480XF0
N/A
HP PRINTER W/ ENVELOPE FEEDER
LASERJET P4515x CNDY307311
RC003035
HP PRINTER COLOR LASRERJET
5500HDN JPK001522
RC004553
XEROX PRINTER W/LARGE PAPER TRAY
WORKCENTRE 5335 AE9884227
RC004546 XEROX PRINTER WORKCENTRE 5775 XEL569756
N/A XEROX STAPLES TYPE XF PRT# 008R13041
N/A XEROX STAPLES TYPE XF PRT# 008R13042
N/A
XEROX STAPLES TYPE XF
PRT#008R13043 PRT# 008R13043
N/A
XEROX FUSER WEB ASSEMBLY
CLEANING CARTRIDGE
4110/4590/4112/4127 008R13085
RC4585
XEROX PRINTER/COPY
WORKCENTRE3550 VMA574565
RC004584
XEROX PRINTER/COPY
WORKCENTRE3550 VMA574562
RC004920 LENOVO MONITOR 9419-HC2 VLY2081
RC004924 LENOVO MONITOR 9419-HC2 VLDM298
RC004926 LENOVO MONITOR 9419-HC2 VLY2088
RC004936 LENOVO MONITOR 9419-HC2 VLY1410
Page 47
RC004921 LENOVO MONITOR 9419-HC2 VLY2083
RC004927 LENOVO MONITOR 9419-HC2 VLY2079
RC004933 LENOVO MONITOR 9419-HC2 VLY1408
RC004937 LENOVO MONITOR 9419-HC2 VLY1400
RC002909 LENOVO MONITOR 9419-HC2 VLY2086
RC004932 LENOVO MONITOR 9419-HC2 VLY2080
RC004925 LENOVO MONITOR 9419-HC2 VLDM303
RC004930 LENOVO MONITOR 9419-HC2 VLY2076
RC004923 LENOVO MONITOR 9419-HC2 VLY1396
RC004922 LENOVO MONITOR 9419-HC2 VLY207
RC004918 LENOVO MONITOR 9419-HC2 VLY1407
RC004934 LENOVO MONITOR 9417-HC2 VLLX811
RC00498 LENOVO MONITOR 9417-HC2 VLLX670
4569
XEROX PRINTER/COPIER WORKCENTRE
7775 ZOC-2
4570
XEROX PRINTER/COPIER WORKCENTRE
5775 XEL569762
4578
XEROX PRINTER/COPIER WORKCENTRE
5335 FX1A-FAX
1135
XEROX PRINTER/COPIER W/ PAPER
STORAGE WORKCENTRE 7970 J-4203
4563
XEROX PRINTER/COPIER WORKCENTRE
7535 F4D-2
4552
XEROX PRINTER/COPIER WORKCENTRE
5775 XEL569721
4551
XEROX WORKCENTER 5335
PRINTER/COPIER N/A
5994 PANASONIC LAPTOP CF-VEK201LM
4937 HP DESKTOP HP COMPACQ PRO 6300 MXL33085S
5001 HP DESKTOP HP COMPACQ PRO 6300 MXL330087X
5006 HP DESKTOP HP COMPACQ PRO 6300 MXL330080Z
4933 HP DESKTOP HP COMPACQ PRO 6300 MXL33007ZS
4926 HP DESKTOP HP COMPACQ PRO 6300 MXL3300819
4929 HP DESKTOP HP COMPACQ PRO 6300 MXL330087Y
4936 HP DESKTOP HP COMPACQ PRO 6300 MXL3300829
4923 HP DESKTOP HP COMPACQ PRO 6300 MXL33007ZL
4922 HP DESKTOP HP COMPACQ PRO 6300 MXL33007ZZ
4931 HP DESKTOP HP COMPACQ PRO 6300 MXL330085N
4932 HP DESKTOP HP COMPACQ PRO 6300 MXL330085R
4934 HP DESKTOP HP COMPACQ PRO 6300 MXL330083T
4921 HP DESKTOP HP COMPACQ PRO 6300 MXL330080Q
4927 HP DESKTOP HP COMPACQ PRO 6300 MXL3300818
4713 HP DESKTOP HP COMPACQ PRO 6300 MXL330085D
5079 HP DESKTOP HP COMPACQ PRO 6300 MXL330085Q
Page 48
5242 HP DESKTOP HP COMPACQ PRO 6300 MXL330088L
4898 HP DESKTOP HP COMPACQ PRO 6300 MXL33008BS
4912 HP DESKTOP HP COMPACQ PRO 6300 MXL330083T
5192 HP DESKTOP HP COMPACQ PRO 6300 MXL33008C5
5155 HP DESKTOP HP COMPACQ PRO 6300 MXL33007Y8
4919 HP DESKTOP HP COMPACQ PRO 6300 MXL33008BT
5243 HP DESKTOP HP COMPACQ PRO 6300 MXL330089K
5160 HP DESKTOP HP COMPACQ PRO 6300 MXL33007Y7
4902 HP DESKTOP HP COMPACQ PRO 6300 MXL33008BP
5230 HP DESKTOP HP COMPACQ PRO 6300 MXL330088D
4914 HP DESKTOP HP COMPACQ PRO 6300 MXL330089P
5241 HP DESKTOP HP COMPACQ PRO 6300 MXL33008CV
4917 HP DESKTOP HP COMPACQ PRO 6300 MXL33008CK
4920 HP DESKTOP HP COMPACQ PRO 6300 MXL33008W
4928 HP DESKTOP HP COMPACQ PRO 6300 MXL3300817
4930 HP DESKTOP HP COMPACQ PRO 6300 MXL33007ZT
4935 HP DESKTOP HP COMPACQ PRO 6300 MXL3300852
4918 HP DESKTOP HP COMPACQ PRO 6300 MXL3300882
4096 HP DESKTOP PRODESK 600 MXL4452PPK
5133 LENOVO MONITOR 9419-HC2 VLDM191
N/A LENOVO MONITOR 9419-HC2 VLDM321
N/A LENOVO MONITOR 9419-HC2 VLDM261
1438 LENOVO MONITOR 9419-HC2 VLDM455
1437 LENOVO MONITOR 9419-HC2 VLDM399
1439 LENOVO MONITOR 9419-HC2 VLDM286
1432 LENOVO MONITOR 9419-HC2 VLDM401
N/A LENOVO MONITOR 9419-HC2 VLDM332
N/A LENOVO MONITOR 9419-HC2 VLDM288
N/A SHARP MONITOR LC-19DV24U 810869543
1443 HP MONITOR PRODISPLAY P201 3CQ3121VVF
1441 HP MONITOR PRODISPLAY P201 6CM32335LT
989 HP MONITOR E221I 6NC5420QH
1435 DELL MONITOR 1800 FP KR-07R477-35830-31T-0152
N/A LENOVO MONITOR 9419-HC2 VLDM194
1447 LENOVO MONITOR L225PWE V6-BF475
1006 DELL MONITOR 27OWB MX-08HW117-7462-95S-1KAS
1348 DELL MONITOR E2416HB CN-0G0RH1-261-69C-39C-A00
1630 VIEWSONIC MONITOR VS15560 TVR151762275
1632 VIEWSONIC MONITOR VS15560 TVR151762258
1636 VIEWSONIC MONITOR VS15560 TVR151763160
Page 49
1643 VIEWSONIC MONITOR VS15560 TVR151762273
1642 VIEWSONIC MONITOR VS15560 TVR151762271
1641 VIEWSONIC MONITOR VS15560 TVR153260100
1631 VIEWSONIC MONITOR VS15560 TVR153260101
1635 VIEWSONIC MONITOR VS15560 TVR151762272
5038 HP DESKTOP COMPACQ PRO 6300 MXL330080L
4909 HP DESKTOP COMPACQ PRO 6300 MXL33007WS
5350 HP DESKTOP COMPACQ PRO 6300 MXL330089X
4687 GRANICUS SERVER GRANICUS 2.87202E+11
5795 HP DESKTOP PRODESK 4003G MXL62824XK
4358 HP DESKTOP COMPACQ PRO 6300 MXL15208VH
4732 HP LAPTOP PRODESK6470B CNU332C76K
4348 DELL LAPTO P15G 1GM8DS1
4830 HP LAPTOP PRODESK6470B CNU32S76R
5119 HP LAPTOP ELITEBOOK 5CB3290C8B
5028 HP LAPTOP ELITEBOOK 5CB3290C8H
4454 DELL LAPTOP P15G 8VD1LV1
4456 DELL LAPTOP P15G GHN3LV1
5030 HP LAPTOP ELITEBOOK 8CV3290C8C
4431 DELL LAPTOP P15G 6S9SGV1
3571 APPLE LAPTOP MACBOOK PRO 6N90703GL13EB
3518 APPLE LAPTOP MACBOOK PRO 6N9070426C3EB
N/A BROTHER FAX MACHINE FAX-2820 U61325G1N92170
1174 HP PRINTER Q74938 JP2LD72654
N/A TIGHTROPE MEDIA SYSTEM CG330-C CSE-512
4478 HP DESKTOP A3C44AV 2UA24529Y7
4151 GRANICUS MEDIA SYSTEM AC1 AQNBBVX
N/A THIGHTROPE MEDIA SYSTEM N/A 4602
N/A
THIGHTROPE MEDIA SYSTEM
SX2BROADCAST VIDEO 14127
N/A LENOVO RECIEPT PRINTER WTP-100LL FW07065897
N/A DELL DESKTOP PRECISIONT1560 7QK8CX1
1163 EPSON SCANNER J131B GEBW04097
N/A HP PRINTER Q3950A CNJ84Y0M8
2407 SONY CAMERA MVC-FE88 77778
4967 LENOVO TABLET THINKPAD 1.3402E+13
4290 LENOVO LAPTOP W701 R9-1TF98
4718 HP LAPTOP PROBOOK47B CNU332C74T
N/A FUJI FILM CAMERA FINEPIS 6DA79124
N/A FUJI FILM CAMERA FINEPIS 6CB57398
N/A FUJI FILM CAMERA FINEPIS 6CB57381
N/A FUJI FILM CAMERA FINEPIS 6ZA92205
N/A FUJI FILM CAMERA FINEPIS 6CB57382
Page 50
N/A FUJI FILM CAMERA FINEPIS 6ZA92333
4974 LENOVO TABLET THINKPAD 143002050
N/A DYNEX MONITOR DX-19L-A11 Z619EJA003036
N/A KONFTIL CONFER. PHONE 300WX 71G7180096
N/A APC BATTERY UPS FUA1500RM2U AS1238235509
N/A APC BATTERY UPS FUA3000RM2U AS12S0420965
N/A
POLYCOM CONFER. PHONE
SOUNDSTATION2 H8104202939A
N/A PANASONIC VCR AG2560 L9KN01068
N/A NAC PHONE DTERMSERIES 19402332
N/A NAC PHONE DTERMSERIES 134038086
N/A VISIONNEER SCANNER 9420USB 90-1059-A001
N/A HP PRINTERTRAY CN279 1146B011AA
IS 00985 MONITOR HP ELITE DISPLAY E8221I CNC5240QKG
IS 00843 MONITOR HP PRO DISPLAY P201 3CQ4270LV7
IS 00844 MONITOR HP PRO DISPLAY P201 3CQ4270LVD
IS 001088 MONITOR HP PRO DISPLAY P201 6CM3270FR2
NA MONITOR HP PRO DISPLAY P201 3CQ40119CK
IS00802 MONITOR HP PRO DISPLAY P201 3CQ3422LZY
IS 00605 MONITRO E2011HC CN0282VM6418019M04 2 AM
IS 00835 MONITOR HP PRO DISPLAY P201 3CQ4243VT
NA MONITOR HP COMPAQ LA 2006X 3CQ2261DCQ
IS 001067 MONITOR HP PRO DISPLAY P201 3CQ35200 QD
NA MONITOR HP PRO DISPLAY P201 6CM 3330TQB
IS 001089 MONITOR HP PRO DISPLAY P201 6 CM 3270FR5
IS 00865 MONITOR HP PRO DISPLAY P201 3CQ4270 LV6
RC 005401 DESKTOP HP ELITE DESK 800 G1 MXL4111VX7
RC 004635
CONFIGURATION BOX POWEREDGE
ARE 720 E14S
RC 005320 DESKTOP Z220 WORKSTATION 2UA 33115QQ
RC 004486 DESKTOP Z420 WORKSTATION 2UA2480XF2
RC 004483 DESKTOP Z420 WORKSTATION 2UA 2480XDZ
RC 004441 DESKTOP U449AV 2UA2390V 7Q
RC 004440 DESKTOP U449AV 2UA 2390V7N
RC 005769 DESKTOP PWS903PQ C7320LF14MF0087
RC 004877 DESKTOP HP COMPAQ PRO 6300 MXL330084R
RC 004858 DESKTOP HP COMPAQ PRO 6300 MXL3300868
RC 004833 DESKTOP HP COMPAQ PRO 6300 MXL3300898
RC 004813 DESKTOP HP COMPAQ PRO 6300 MXL330080N
RC 004806 DESKTOP HP COMPAQ PRO 6300 MXL33007YV
RC 004777 DESKTOP HP COMPAQ PRO 6300 MXL33007XS
RC 004805 DESKTOP HP COMPAQ PRO 6300 M XL330083C
Page 51
RC 004804 DESKTOP HP COMPAQ PRO 6300 MXL33007Z9
RC 004884 DESKTOP HP COMPAQ PRO 6300 MXL330083P
RC 00801 DESKTOP HP COMPAQ PRO 6300 MXL330082 S
RC 004800 DESKTOP HP COMPAQ PRO 6300 MXL3300831
RC 004796 DESKTOP HP COMPAQ PRO 6300 MSL330087R
RC 004793 DESKTOP HP COMPAQ PRO 6300 MXL3300820
RC 004786 DESKTOP HP COMPAQ PRO 6300 MXL33007YQ
RC 004676 DESKTOP OPTIPLEX 3010 4Y 7QTW
RC004669 DESKTOP OPTIPLEX 3010 4Y8PTW1
RC 004668 DESKTOP OPTIPLEX 3010 4Y7 MTW1
RC 006163 DESKTOP FSP18020TGBAA SPC0E0XPN
RC 006156 DESKTOP FSP18020TGBAA SPC0E0WYA
RC 006158 DESKTOP FSP18020TGBAA SPCOEOWYG
RC 006162 DESKTOP FSP18020TGBAA SPC0E0X16
RC 00615 DESKTOP FSP18020TGBAA SPC0E0WY9
RC005289 DESKTOP HP COMPAQ PRO 6300 MXL3300804
RC 005236 DESKTOP HP COMPAQ PRO 6300 MXL33008C3
RC 004947 DESKTOP HP COMPAQ PRO 6300 M XL330089G
RC 005008 DESKTOP HP COMPAQ PRO 6300 MXL330084W
RC 004925 DESKTOP HP COMPAQ PRO 6300 M XL3300815
RC 004924 DESKTOP HP COMPAQ PRO 6300 MXL330080T
RC 004881 DESKTOP HP COMPAQ PRO 6300 MFL3300891
RC 004886 DESKTOP HP COMPAQ PRO 6300 MXL33007ZQ
RC 004876 DESKTOP HP COMPAQ PRO 6300 M XL330084P
RC 004869 DESKTOP HP COMPAQ PRO 6300 M XL3300817
RC 005012 DESKTOP HP COMPAQ PRO 6300 MXL33007ZC
RC 004894 DESKTOP HP COMPAQ PRO 6300 MXL330086D
RC005400 DESKTOP ELITE DESK 800 MXL427104Y
RC 005159 HP COMPAQ PRO 6300 MXL33007Y2
RC 004438 DESKTOP Z420 WORKSTATION 2UA2390V7M
RC 006251 DESKTOP THINKSTATION P310 MJ05AE69
RC 005064 LAPTOP HP PROBOOK 6470B CNU332C74D
RC 003566 LAPTOP TOUGHBOOK ESN6029F17E
NA TELEPHONE DTERM SERIES E DTP 16D1
RC001065 HP ProDisplay P201 Monitor 3CQ40119C1
RC001371 HP ProDisplay P201 Monitor 3CQ3422M0F
RC004652 DELL OPTIPLEX 3010 4Y8MTW1
RC004653 DELL OPTIPLEX 3010 4Y6NTW1
RC004654 DELL OPTIPLEX 3010 4Y5MTW1
RC004655 DELL OPTIPLEX 3010 4Y9QTW1
RC004656 DELL OPTIPLEX 3010 4Y5QTW1
RC004661 DELL OPTIPLEX 3010 4Y9PTW1
RC004663 DELL OPTIPLEX 3010 4YBMTW1
Page 52
RC004665 DELL OPTIPLEX 3010 4Y6QTW1
RC004666 DELL OPTIPLEX 3010 4Y6MTW1
RC004667 DELL OPTIPLEX 3010 4Y9NTW1
RC004670 DELL OPTIPLEX 3010 4Y7NTW1
RC004671 DELL OPTIPLEX 3010 4Y6PTW1
RC004675 DELL OPTIPLEX 3010 4YCMTW1
RC004677 DELL OPTIPLEX 3010 4Y5PTW1
RC004788 HP Compaq Pro 6300 SFF (SRP) US MXL330080D
RC004789 HP Compaq Pro 6300 SFF (SRP) US MXL330081V
RC004791 HP Compaq Pro 6300 SFF (SRP) US MXL3300838
RC004802 HP Compaq Pro 6300 SFF (SRP) US MXL3300821
RC004853 HP Compaq Pro 6300 SFF (SRP) US MXL3300859
RC004866 HP Compaq Pro 6300 SFF (SRP) US MXL3300890
RC004868 HP Compaq Pro 6300 SFF (SRP) US MXL330085X
RC004873 HP Compaq Pro 6300 SFF (SRP) US MXL330087Q
RC004887 HP Compaq Pro 6300 SFF (SRP) US MXL330087T
RC005071 HP ProBook 6470b CNU332C746
N\A Sony Blue ray disc player 1023481
5223 HP Compaq Pro 6300 SFF (SRP) US MXL33008CP
5282 HP Compaq Pro 6300 SFF (SRP) US MXL330081P
N\A KIP Printer/ scanner 12402962
N\A Dell PC HLSP301
1533 Dell Monitor CN0DT0PH7426132D34JL
1532 Dell Monitor CN0DT0PH7426132D34KL
1535 Dell Monitor CN0DT0PH7426132D34LL
1528 Dell Monitor CN0DT0PH7426132D34YL
1529 Dell Monitor CN0DT0PH7426132D351L
1523 Dell Monitor CN0DT0PH7426132D35DL
1527 Dell Monitor CN0DT0PH7426132D350L
1543 Dell Monitor CN0DT0PH7426132D352L
1522 Dell Monitor CN0DT0PH7426132D34UL
1538 Dell Monitor CN0DT0PH7426132D35HL
N\A HP Monitor CNC1450YL0
Page 53
N\A Optiquest Monitor 123033801162.00
IS00864 HP Monitor 3CQ4270LV8
1540 Dell Monitor CN0DT0PH7426132D34TL
1531 Dell Monitor CN0DT0PH7426132D355L
1542 Dell Monitor CN0DT0PH7426132D35FL
1530 Dell Monitor CN0DT0PH7426132D35JL
1524 Dell Monitor CN0DT0PH7426132D34HL
N\A Dell Monitor MX03K6484663428F108J
N\A DELL PC 8QP6S22
N\A Optiquest Monitor CD93602223
N\A HP Monitor 6CM34711TR
N\A DELL PC D42B842
N\A Compaq PC 4CE00602KD
N\A DELL PC D44B842
N\A Insignia Monitor B241LX506415
N\A Telco PC 3028VE
1806 3Com Swich 7ZLV32A06D8
N\A Compaq PC 3CR0381BFF
N\A HP PC 3CR3310BBQ
1228 Dell Monitor CNOWRKOC7287258DA18L
N\A APC UPS as0436131524
5071 hp Laptop CNU332C746
N\A HP Server MXQ94902GU
N\A QSC Dual modular amplifier 29700511.00
N\A QSC Dual modular amplifier 19708038.00
N\A TRIPP LITE UPS 2553MLCPS719200635
N\A TRIPP LITE UPS 2505AW0PS87C700012
N\A HP PC 3CR2480274
4351 DELL Laptop 8km8ds1
N\A HP Laptop CND7030J41
N\A TRIPP LITE UPS 2616AY0BP000E00077
N\A TRIPP LITE UPS 2903PLCPS719200146
Page 54
7536 TRIPP LITE UPS 3021HY0BP000E00028
N\A TRIPP LITE UPS 2715GLCPS795000101
N\A Cisco Gateway Switch FTX1207A1F0
4139 HP Printer JP8LB71492
4191 HP Printer cndy271352
3513 hp Printer jp8lb73498
6579 Lenovo Chromebook p203vz02p29yb8c04001
N\A Brother Laser Fax 2840 N/A
N/A XEROX PRINTER WORK CENTRE 7775 RFX031899 N
RC004558 D95 BG2 942313
RC004554 XEROX PRINTER WORK CENTRE 5335 AE9885546
N/A XEROX PRINTER WORK CENTRE 7970 B0W590154
RC004561 XEROX PRINTER WORK CENTRE 7535 XKK425104
RC004571 XEROX PRINTER WORK CENTRE 7535 XKK425127
N/A HP PRINTER DESIGNJET Z6200 PHOTO MY16A2900W
6348 LENOVO LAPTOP Thinkpad X1 yoga R9-0NT48417/07
6316 HP PC TPC-PO55-DM MXL62825S0
6318 HP PC P5V95UT#ABA MXL62825RX
6344 LENOVO LAPTOP Thinkpad X1 yoga R9-0nt3lb 17/07
5985 Dell PC Precision 5810 5zqysd2
5207 HP PC E6L05US#ABA MXL3292S5H
4911 HP PC E5M40US#ABA MXL330083x
4913 HP PC E5M40US#ABA MXL33007YT
5248 HP PC E5M40US#ABA MXL3300827
4812 HP PC E5M40US#ABA MXL33007Z5
4746 HP PC E5M40US#ABA MXL330087G
5206 HP PC E6L05US#ABA MXL3292S5G
5208 HP PC E6L05US#ABA MXL3292S5M
6338 LENOVO PC 003Eus PC0J6R4W
5464 HP PC C8T89AV MXL41500YC
N/A SYSTOR SYSTEMS FP-040 PR2375
1053 HP PRINTER HP LASERJET 4250TN CNRXX42956
N/A DELL PC PRECISION 3620 CGZMGB2
4128 HP PRINTER HP LASERJET P4015X CNDY352670
6446 LENOVO LAPTOP Thinkpad X1 yoga R9-OR4AFH
N/A IBM MONITOR THINKVISION V6-61884
00670 DELL MONITOR P1913B 0DT0PH-74261-32D-34RL
4582 XEROX PRINTER WORKCENTER 3550 VMA574468
Page 55
1194 ACER MONITOR V226HQL MMLY7AA0043450A6B28510
0978 VIEWSONIC MONITOR VS15560 tvr152860791
1151 HP MONITOR C9F26A C9F26A3cq4270lts
729 HP MONITOR C9F26A 6cm32335jz
N/A SAMSUNG MONITOR 191TPLUS nb19hchx421448f
1239 DELL MONITOR E2316HF
CN-0PJMM7-72872-663-C9PI-
A00
1140 ACER MONITOR V226HQL mmly7aa0043450a34e8510
N/A LENOVO 9419-HC2 VLDR007
601 HP MONITOR COMPAQ LA2006X CNC217P1YD
N\A HP MONITOR COMPAQ LA2006X cnc1450ykl
N\A ACER MONITOR V226HQL mmly7aa0043450a6b98510
N/A LENOVO MONITOR 9419-HC2 VLDM329
N/A DELL MONITOR E2420H 03CGJH-BO300-9CR-1ARB-A01
6095 LENOVO LAPTOP THINKPAD 1S20fq002yusr90nt44a
4728 HP LAPTOP PROBOOK 6470B cnu332c7fj
6006 P+A52ANASONIC cf-20c5003vm 6kksa19875
572 AP MONITOR COMPAQ LA2006X cnc203p6bw
937 ACER MONITOR B226WL mmlxvaa00143903ddb8500
1086 HP MONITOR PRODISPLAY P201 6cm3270dtb
672 LENOVO MONITOR THINKVISION VNADXYX
N/A DELL MONITOR E2417H 0T4KPW-QDC00-76K-0LYI-A00
1742 DELL MONITOR U2415B 0CFV9N-74261-72J-2WDS-A04
6106
PANASONIC TOUGHBOOK cf-
20c5003vm 6jksa17265
1114 ACER MONITOR V226HQL mmly7aa0043450a3568510
5997
PANASONIC TOUGHBOOK cf-
20c5003vm 6jksa17228
N/A PLANAR MONITOR PL-1900 5106cja015467
5995
PANASONIC TOUGHBOOK cf-
20c5003vm 6kksa19864
4965 LENOVO TABLET THINKPAD 13402000199565
3263 MOTEROLA RADIO XTL5000 585cfp0090
5996
PANASONIC TOUGHBOOK cf-
20c5003vm 6kksa19866
Page 56
811
IOMEGA CD ROM DRIVE
CDDVD522416EC3 elae4001cx
5998
PANASONIC TOUGHBOOK cf-
20c5003vm 6kksa19868
N/A HP MONITOR W237LD 6cm3391mf7
4645
PANASONIC TOUGHBOOK cf-
191fyax1m 3ekyb26442
5741 LENOVO LAPTOP THINKPAD YOGA 14 1S20fy0002usr90hzqjs
5381 HP LAPTOP PROBOOK 640 G1 5cg426jmwd
4831 HP LAPTOP PROBOOK647OB cnu332c76d
1644 VIEWSONIC MONITOR VS15560 tvr152460345
1196 ACER MONITOR V226HQL mmly7aa0043450a6a18510
1123 ACER MONITOR V226HQL mmly7aa0043450a6ba8510
1122 ACER MONITOR V226HQL mmly7aa0043450a3458510
5780 LENOVO LAPTOP Thinkpad X1 yoga R9-0L4T46 16-07
1149 ACER MONITOR V226HQL mmly7aa0043450a33f8510
1099 ACER MONITOR V226HQL mmly7aa0043450a69a8510
1125 ACER MONITOR V226HQL mmly7aa0043450a3598510
1126 ACER MONITOR V226HQL mmly7aa0043450a6a68510
1152 ACER MONITOR V226HQL mmly7aa0043450a6b58510
1150 ACER MONITOR V226HQL MMLY7AA0043450A69E8510
1162 ACER MONITOR V226HQL MMLY7AA0043450A69F8510
n/a ACER MONITOR V226HQL MMLY7AA0043450A34D8510
N/A ACER MONITOR V226HQL MMLY7AA0043450A69C8510
7396 HP LAPTOP wqs98ut#aba cnd64980cj
4138 HP PRINTER Q7493A JP8LB71973
5527 HP LAPTOP protectsmart CND408168N
6007 CANON SCANNER DR-G1130 GF305236
7389 HP LAPTOP protectsmart CND7030DB2
5777 LENOVO LAPTOP Thinkpad X1 yoga R9-0KLPD116-05
4183 HP PRINTER cb511a cndy188414
Page 57
6585 LENOVO LAPTOP Thinkpad X1 yoga r90sr04e
4129 HP PRINTER cb511a cndy352685
5456 PANASONIC TOUGHBOOK CF19 9kksa23823
4648 PANASONIC TOUGHBOOK CF19 3ikyb43559
5026 HP LAPTOP ELITEBOOK 8570 P 5cb3290c87
4156 PANASONIC TOUGHBOOK CF19 9dkya70189
628 HP LAPTOP HP 3125 5cd3225lbh
4938 HP LAPTOP HP Probook 6470b CNU332C74L
6624 LENOVO LAPTOP Thinkpad X1 yoga R90SVBDR18/12
5749 HP DESKTOP Prodesk 600 G2 mini MXL6060TNF
5460 PANASONIC TOUGHBOOK CF19 4jkya02010
1615 CANON SCANNER K30318 acur55020m
1638 VIEWSONIC MONITOR VX2252MH tvr153260756
1629 VIEWSONIC MONITOR VX2252MH tvr151762282
N/A INSIGNIA MONITOR lcd t v B230EP500517
N/A PELCO CAMERA em1450 EH2508
n/a CISCO SWITCH catalyst 3560 CAT0950R3KN
n/a
MONOPRICE DRAWING TABLET
powersourse 150300885
n/a APEX DVD PLAYER ad 1500 d15001101
n/a ONKYO SUBWOFFER skw330 5583580852
n/a ONKYO AV RECIEVER HT-R330 4583021701
n/a ONKYO SPEAKER skc-330c 5573886876
IS00990 HP MONITOR elitedisplay E22Li cnc5240qkp
n/a IOMEGA DVD PLAYER dvd rw20x EWAH52010R
N/A
EXTRON NETWORK VIDEO SWITCH TP T
15 HD 859727009
N/A
EXTRON NETWORK VIDEO SWITCH TP T
15 HD 859727001
N/A MONOPRICE VGA EXTENDER VGAL+ cc5720930000898
N/A MONOPRICE VGA EXTENDER VGAL+ cc5720930000897
1711 LENOVO MONITOR 9220-HV1 V1A5926
N/A TOSHIBA LAPTOP SATELITE pa1262u-s6c
N/A ONKYO AV RECIEVER HT-R330 6582028815
N/A ACER LAPTOP TRAVELMATE 2450 639721116
1710 LENOVO MONITOR 9220-HB1 V1A5904
N/A TOSHIBA CAMERA 10 BIT dsp n/a
is00974 VIEWSONIC MONITOR VX2252MH tvr152860805
1637 VIEWSONIC MONITOR VX2252MH tvr153260753
is00613 HP MONITOR LA2006X MONITOR cnc217p1sl
1633 VIEWSONIC MONITOR VX2252MH tvr151762271
1137 ACER MONITOR V226HQL mmly7aa0043450a3418510
Page 58
1138 ACER MONITOR V226HQL mmly7aa0043450a3538510
N/A DELL MONITOR E2011HC cn02h2vm6418019m03gm
N/A HP MONITOR P201 6cm33209hq
1199 DELL MONITOR S2516M
CN-0MNYR6-64180-5BR-23DT-
A00
1200 DELL MONITOR S2516M
CN-0MNYR6-64180-5BR-22KT-
00
is00970 VIEWSONIC MONITOR VA2446M-LED tst152921232
1627 VIEWSONIC MONITOR VX2252MH TRV153260741
N/A HP MONITOR P201 6CM33209l0
is00742 HP MONITOR P201 6CM32335lX
is00633 HP MONITOR P201 CNC217P1YB
N/A DELL MONITOR E2417H
CN-0T4KPW-QDC00-98A-1D9L-
A06
5990 DELL PC PRECISION 5XR1PD2
4230 LENOVO PC THINKSTATION D20 1S4155CTOMJINH92
MISCELLANEOUS/ ELECTRONICS
757
Panasonic Wide Plasma TV Model: TH-
42PW06 Y04310258
758
Panasonic Wide Plasma TV Model: TH-
42PW06 Y04310258
MISCELLANEOUS/SMALL EQUIPMENT
1795
(1) Waxie DC191500 Floor Finishing
Machine N/A
E-394 (1) Waxie TS19 Floor Machine N/A
6005 1 MI-T-M 3004 Pressure Washer N/A
YEAR VEHICLES VIN #
2009 Ford Hybrid Escape 1FMCU49349KA19086
2013 Ford F 250 1FD7X2A6XDEA93008
2006 Ford F 150 IFTPW14566FB17984
2009 Ford Hybrid Escape 1FMCU49349KA32565
2009 Ford Hybrid Escape 1FMCU49379KA34150
2008 Ford Hybrid Escape 1FMCU49H98KE43518
2008 Ford Hybrid Escape 1FMCU49H38KE43515
2006 Ford Explorer 1FMEU72E36UB31982
2013 Ford F 250 1FD7X2A68DEA93007
2008 Ford Hybrid Escape 1FMCU49H18KE43514
1997 Ford F 250 3FTHF25F6VMA03578
2006 Ford F 350 1FDWF36YX6ED85307
2009 Ford Hybrid Escape 1FMCU49329KA32564
2008 Ford Hybrid Escape 1FMCU49H58KB80038
2010 Ford F 550 1FDAW5GY5AEA26315
Page 59
DATE:April 6, 2022
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer
Romeo M. David, Associate Engineer
SUBJECT:Consideration to Accept as Complete, File Notice of Completion and
Authorize Release of Retention and Bonds for the EV Chargers at Various
Locations Project (Contract No. 2021-109). (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council:
1. Accept the EV Chargers at Various Locations Project, Contract No. 2021-109 (Project),
as complete;
2. Approve the final contract amount of $228,634;
3. Authorize the release of the Faithful Performance Bond 35 days after recordation of Notice
of Completion and accept a Maintenance Guarantee Bond;
4. Authorize the release of the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of $222,780, six
months after the recordation of said notice if no claims have been received;
5. Authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and release of the project
retention, 35 days after recordation of Notice of Completion; and
6. Authorize the City Engineer to approve the release of the Maintenance Bond one year
following the filing of the Notice of Completion if the improvements remain free from
defects in material and workmanship.
BACKGROUND:
On September 1, 2021, the City Council awarded a construction contract to Alfaro Communication
Construction, Inc. in the amount of $222,780 plus 10% contingency in the amount of $22,278 to
address unforeseen construction related incidentals. A vicinity map illustrating the three locations
(Civic Center, Central Park, and Public Works Services Center) that received EV Chargers is
included as Attachment 1. A copy of the September 1, 2022, City Council Staff Report is on file
with the City Clerk.
The scope of work consisted of, but was not limited to, furnishing and installing new ChargePoint
dual output gateway unit commercial electric vehicle charging stations (EVSE) including
foundations, bollards, conduit, new wiring, pull boxes, prepaid commercial cloud plan, prepaid
ChargePoint Assure service plan, setup, and activation; removing and salvaging existing electric
Page 60
Page 2
1
1
8
6
vehicle charging stations; installing salvaged electric vehicle charging stations with new
foundations, bollards, conduit, wiring, and pull boxes for use by City owned EVs; minor
modifications to parking areas including surfacing, signs and striping per the plans.
ANALYSIS:
The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications
and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The net increase in the total cost of the project is a
result of two (2) Change Orders, including the final balancing statement, which are summarized
below:
Change Order No.1: Parking stall re-striping to comply with accessibility requirements, removal
of one bollard and relocating wheel stop to clear accessible pathway. The change in contract cost
due to this change order is an increase of $5,254.
Change Order No.2: The balancing statement for the project. The balancing statement conforms
the final contract quantities to the actual quantities placed or constructed during the contract. The
notable change is an increase in the amount of $600 resulting from an increase in the final
quantities of detectable warning surface “Truncated Dome” to comply with accessibility
requirements.
At the end of the one-year maintenance period, if the improvements remain free from defects in
materials and workmanship, the City Clerk will release the Maintenance Bond upon approval by
the City Engineer.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Expenditures for the project were not included in the budget for Fiscal Year 2021/22 therefore, a
total of $273,640 were appropriated during award of contract for the Project. A total of $22,500
from the MSRC Air Pollution Grant Fund (Fund 106) and $251,140 from AB2766 Air Quality
Improvement Fund (Fund 105). Additionally, staff will be submitting a total of $22,500
reimbursement request to the Mobile Source Air Pollution Reduction Review Committee (MSRC)
to receive previously awarded grant funds which will reimburse a portion of the total project costs.
The final project cost is $257,207as shown below:
Expenditure Amount
Final Construction Contract $228,634
Construction Inspection Services $26,400
Bid Noticing $2,173
Estimated Construction Costs $257,207
A total of $16,433 is remaining in the budget for this project and will be returned to the AB2766
Air Quality Improvement Fund (Fund 105) fund balances to be used for future capital improvement
projects that aim to improve air quality.
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:
This project meets our City Council core values by promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy
community for all, and by providing continuous improvement through the construction of high-
quality public improvements.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 - Vicinity Map
Page 61
ATTACHMENT 1
EV Chargers at Various Locations
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
Project Site
Page 62
DATE:April 6, 2022
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer
Romeo M. David, Associate Engineer
SUBJECT:Consideration to Accept as Complete, File the Notice of Completion and
Authorize Release of Retention and Bonds for the Fiscal Year 2021/22
Local Overlay Pavement Rehabilitation Project (Contract No. 2021-117).
(CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council:
1. Accept the Fiscal Year 2021/22 Local Overlay Pavement Rehabilitation, Contract No.
2021-117 (Project), as complete;
2. Approve the final contract amount of $1,774,223;
3. Authorize the release of the Faithful Performance Bond 35 days after recordation of Notice
of Completion and accept a Maintenance Guarantee Bond;
4. Authorize the release of the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of $1,718,302, six
months after the recordation of said notice if no claims have been received;
5. Authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and release of the project
retention, 35 days after recordation of Notice of Completion; and
6. Authorize the City Engineer to approve the release of the Maintenance Bond one year
following the filing of the Notice of Completion if the improvements remain free from
defects in material and workmanship.
BACKGROUND:
On October 20, 2022, the City Council awarded a construction contract to Gentry Brother’s, Inc.,
in the amount of $1,718,302 plus 10% contingency in the amount of $171,830 to address
unforeseen construction related incidentals. A vicinity map illustrating the various neighborhood
streets that received pavement overlay is included as Attachment 1. A copy of the October 20,
2021, City Council Staff Report is on file with the City Clerk. The scope of work consisted of cold
milling, routing and crack sealing, asphalt concrete overlay, adjusting existing manholes, clean-
outs, water meters, and valves to new grade, installation of pavement markers and striping,
upgrading existing curb ramps and related items of work per plans.
ANALYSIS:
The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications
Page 63
Page 2
1
1
7
4
and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The net increase in the total cost of the project is a
result of two (2) Change Orders, including the final balancing statement, which are summarized
below:
Change Order No.1: Removal of two existing trees, repair of damaged irrigation due to roots and
replacement of two 24-gallon trees. The change in contract cost due to this change order is an
increase of $4,500.
Change Order No.2: The balancing statement for the project. The balancing statement conforms
the final contract quantities to the actual quantities placed or constructed during the contract. The
notable change is an increase in the amount of $51,421 resulting from an increase in the final
quantities of asphalt concrete placed and final number of utility adjustments.
At the end of the one-year maintenance period, if the improvements remain free from defects in
materials and workmanship, the City Clerk will release the Maintenance Bond upon approval by
the City Engineer.
FISCAL IMPACT:
A total of $1,820,000 was budgeted in Fiscal Year 2021/22 from the Gas Tax Fund (Fund 174)
for the Project. In addition, $186,600 has been budgeted from Measure I Fund (Fund 177) for
ADA Access Ramps at Various Locations and a portion of this amount was used to cover all
modifications of existing curb ramps along the project limits. A total of $2,006,600 was available
for the local asphalt overlay project. The total funding for this project is identified under Capital
Improvement Project Account No’s. and in the amounts listed below:
Account No.Funding Source Description Amount
11743035650/1022174-0 Gas Tax Fund (174)Local Street Rehab $1,820,000
11773035650/1150177-0 Measure I Fund (177)ADA Ramps $186,600
Total Project Funding $2,006,600
The final project cost is $1,888,691 as shown below:
Expenditure Amount
Final Construction Contract $1,774,223
Construction Inspection Services $39,600
Construction Materials Testing $29,868
Construction Survey Services $45,000
Total Project Cost $1,888,691
A total of $117,909, remains in the budget for this project and will be returned to the Gas Tax
(Fund 174) and Measure I (Fund 177) fund balances to be used for future capital improvement
projects.
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:
This project meets our City Council core values by promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy
community for all, and by providing continuous improvement through the construction of high-
quality public improvements.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 - Vicinity Map
Page 64
ATTACHMENT 1
PROJECT# 800-2021-02
FY 2021/22 LOCAL OVERLAY AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
Project Site
Page 65
DATE:April 6, 2022
TO:President and Members of the Board of Directors
FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Mike McCliman, Fire Chief
Noah Daniels, Finance Director
Darci Vogel, Fire Business Manager
SUBJECT:Consideration to Adopt an Annexation Map Showing Assessor Parcel
Number 1100-191-04 Located at 7878 East Avenue, Which is Proposed
to be Annexed Into CFD No. 85-1; and Approval to Adopt a Resolution of
Intention to Annex Territory Referred to as Annexation No. 22-1 into
Community Facilities District No. 85-1, Specifying Services Proposed to
be Financed, to Set and Specify the Special Taxes Proposed to be Levied
Within the Annexation Territory and Set a Time and Place for a Public
Hearing Related to the Annexation. (RESOLUTION NO. FD 2022-006)
(RESOLUTION NO. FD 2022-007) (FIRE)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Fire Board of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District:
1. Adopt a Resolution adopting Annexation Map No. 22-1 showing property (located at 7878
East Avenue) proposed to be annexed in Community Facilities District No. 85-1; and
2. Adopt a Resolution of Intention to Annex Territory referred to as Annexation No. 22-1 into
Community Facilities District No. 85-1 to specify the services to be financed, to set and
specify the rate and method of apportionment of the special taxes proposed to be levied
within the territory proposed to be annexed and to set a time and place for a public hearing
regarding the annexation.
BACKGROUND:
SC Westbury Limited Partnership, owner of certain property (APN 1100-191-04) located within
the Fire Protection District (the "Territory"), is conditioned by the City and Fire Protection District
to annex such property into the existing Community Facilities District (CFD) No. 85-1 to satisfy
fire protection service mitigation impacts.
ANALYSIS:
In order to initiate formal annexation proceedings, the Fire Board is being asked to adopt a
resolution approving an annexation map of the territory proposed to be annexed and a Resolution
of Intention to Annex.
Resolution No. FD 2022-006 will adopt an annexation map (annexation no. 22-1) showing
property proposed to be annexed into CFD No. 85-1 (Attachment 1). The annexation map
(Attachment 2) illustrates the territory proposed to be annexed. The territory is inclusive of the
Page 66
Page 2
1
2
0
2
entire development project proposed by the owner.
Resolution No. FD 2022-007 declares the Fire Boards intention to authorize the annexation of
territory (annexation no. 22-1) to CFD No. 85-1. The Resolution of Intention generally sets forth:
(a) the District's intention to annex the Territory to the District; (b) the facilities and services which
will, in part, be financed (Attachment 4, Exhibit A) through the levy of the special tax on the
Territory if annexed; (c) the rate and method of apportionment of the proposed special tax
(Attachment 4, Exhibit B); (d) the date, time and location of the public hearing set for May 18,
2022; and (e) election requirements.
Special Counsel for the District has worked with staff to establish the annexation process,
timelines and draft resolutions. The resolutions are considered to be routine and non-
controversial, as the property owners are in support of the annexation procedure. On May 18,
2022, there will be a public hearing for public input/concerns on this matter.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The special tax revenues that are collected of the CFD No. 85-1 are used to pay for public facilities
and services in the District area. Costs related to the administering of the District are the
responsibility of the property owners within the District. Annexation of the property located at
7878 East Avenue will ensure the property owner covers the cost of increased demand for fire
services resulting from new development within the Territory.
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:
This item brings together portions of the Council’s vision and core value by providing a sustainable
City and promoting a safe and healthy community for all. Annexation of the property into CFD
85-1 ensures the delivery of vital fire and life safety services to all residents while satisfying fire
protection service mitigation impacts.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 - CFD 85-1 Map
Attachment 2 - Annexation Map
Attachment 3 - Resolution No. FD 2022-006, Annexation Map No. 22-1
Attachment 4 - Resolution No. FD 2022-007, Intention to Annex
Page 67
!"#$
!"#$
8th St
Hillside Rd
Banyan St
Day Creek BlArchibald AvHaven Av19th St
Arrow RtCarnelian StHellman AveCherry AvFoothill Bl
East AvEtiwanda AvRochester AvGrove AvMilliken Av4th StVineyard Av Wilson Av
Base Line Rd
Hermosa Av6th St
Legend
City LimitsCFD 85-1
210
15
The maps, data, and geographic information ("Information") available by and throughthe City of Rancho Cucamonga are presented as a public resource of general information.The City of Rancho Cucamonga makes nor implies no warranty, representation or guaranteeas to the content, sequence, accuracy, completeness or timeliness of any Informationprovided to you herein. The user should not rely upon the Information for any reasonand is directed to independently verify any and all Information presented herein.The City of Rancho Cucamonga explicitly and without limitation disclaims any and allrepresentations and warrantees, including, but not limited to, the implied warrantiesof merchantibility and fitness for a particular purpose. The City of Rancho Cucamongashall neither accept nor assume any liability, regardless of the causation for (i) anyerrors, omissions or inaccuracies in any information provided and/or (ii) any action orinaction occurring due to any persons reliance upon the Information available herein.
Community Facilities District No. 85-1Annexation No. 22-1APN: 1100-191-04
Annexation 22-1
[
1 0 10.5 Miles
ATTACHMENT 1
Page 68
ATTACHMENT 2 Page 69
RESOLUTION NO. FD 2022-006
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ACTING AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1, ADOPTING AN ANNEXATION MAP
(ANNEXATION NO. 22-1) SHOWING PROPERTY PROPOSED TO BE
ANNEXED TO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, California,
(“Board of Directors”), desires to initiate proceedings to annex territory to an existing Community Facilities
District pursuant to the terms and provisions of the “Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982”, being
Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California (the “Act”), and
specifically Article 3.5 thereof. The existing Community Facilities District has been designated as
Community Facilities District No. 85-1 (the “District”); and,
WHEREAS, there has been submitted a map entitled “Annexation Map No. 22-1 to Community
Facilities District No. 85-1, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, County of San Bernardino, State
of California” (the “Annexation Map”) showing the territory proposed to be annexed to the District
(the “Territory”).
NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District
does hereby resolve as follows:
Section 1: The above recitals are all true and correct.
Section 2: The Annexation Map showing the Territory proposed to be annexed to the District and
to be subject to the levy of a special tax is hereby approved and adopted.
Section 3: A certificate shall be endorsed on the original and on at least one (1) copy of the
Annexation Map, evidencing the date and adoption of this Resolution, and within fifteen (15) days after the
adoption of the Resolution fixing the time and place of the hearing on the intention to annex or extent of
the annexation to the District, a copy of such map shall be filed with the correct and proper endorsements
thereon with the County Recorder, all in the manner and form provided for in Section 3111 of the Streets
and Highways Code of the State of California.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of , 2022.
Resolution No. FD 2022-006 - Page 1 of 1
ATTACHMENT 3
Page 70
Resolution No. FD 2022-007 Page 1 of 11
RESOLUTION NO. FD 2022-007
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ACTING AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO
AUTHORIZE THE ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY (ANNEXATION
NO. 22-1) TO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, California,
(“Board of Directors”), formed a Community Facilities District pursuant to the terms and provisions of the
“Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982”, being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the
Government Code of the State of California (the “Act”). The Community Facilities District has been
designated as Community Facilities District No. 85-1 (the “District”); and,
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors desires to initiate proceedings to consider the annexation of
certain real property to the District (the “Territory”); and
WHEREAS, a map entitled “Annexation Map No. 22-1 to Community Facilities District No. 85-1
Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, County of San Bernardino, State of California” (the
“Annexation Map”) showing the Territory proposed to be annexed to the District has been submitted, which
map has been previously approved and a copy of the map shall be kept on file with the transcript of these
proceedings; and
WHEREAS, this Board of Directors now desires to proceed to adopt its Resolution of Intention to
annex the Territory to District, to describe the territory included within District and the Territory proposed
to be annexed thereto, to specify the facilities and services to be financed from the proceeds of the levy of
special taxes within the Territory, to set and specify the special taxes that would be levied within the
Territory to finance such facilities and services, and to set a time and place for a public hearing relating to
the annexation of the Territory to the District.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District
does hereby resolve as follows:
1. Recitals. The above recitals are all true and correct.
2. Legal Authority. These proceedings for annexation are initiated by this Board of Directors
pursuant to the authorization of the Act.
3. Intention to Annex; Description of the Territory and the District. The Board of Directors
hereby determines that the public convenience and necessity requires that the Territory be added to the
District and this Board of Directors declares its intention to annex the Territory to the District.
A description of the Territory is as follows:
All that property within the Territory proposed to be annexed to the District, as such property is
shown on the Annexation Map as previously approved by this legislative body, a copy of which is on file in
the Office of the Secretary and shall remain open for public inspection.
A general description of the territory included in the District is hereinafter described as follows:
All that property and territory as originally included within the District and as subsequently annexed
to the District, as such properties were shown on original maps of the District and the territories
subsequently annexed to the District, all as approved by this Board of Directors and designated by the
ATTACHMENT 4Page71
Resolution No. FD 2022-007 Page 2 of 11
name of the District, reference is made to the attached and incorporated Exhibit “A” (the “Annexation Map”).
Copies of such maps are on file in the Office of the Secretary and have also been filed in the Office of the
County Recorder.
4. Services and Facilities Authorized to be Finance by the District. The services that are
authorized to be financed by the District from the proceeds of special taxes levied within the existing District
are generally described in Exhibit “B” (the “Services and Facilities”) attached hereto and incorporated
herein by this reference and all costs associated the District, administration of the District, the
determination of the amount of special taxes to be levied, the costs of collection any special taxes, and
costs otherwise incurred in order to carry out the authorized purposes of the District. If and to the extent
feasible the Services and Facilities shall be provided in common within the existing District and the
Territory.
5. Special Taxes. It is the further intention of this Board of Directors body that, except where
funds are otherwise available, a special tax sufficient to pay for the Services and Facilities and related
incidental expenses authorized by the Act, secured by recordation of a continuing lien against all non-
exempt real property in the Territory, will be levied annually within the boundaries of such Territory. For
further particulars as to the rate and method of apportionment of the proposed special tax, reference is
made to Exhibit “C” (the “Special Tax Formula”), which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this
reference and which sets forth in sufficient detail the method of apportionment of such special tax to allow
each landowner or resident within the proposed Territory to clearly estimate the maximum amount that
such person will have to pay.
The special tax proposed to be levied within the Territory shall be equal to the special tax levied to
pay for the Services and Facilities in the existing District, except that a higher or lower special tax may be
levied within the Territory to the extent that the actual cost of providing the Services and Facilities in the
Territory is higher or lower than the cost of providing those Services and Facilities in the existing District.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the special tax may not be levied at a rate which is higher than the maximum
special tax authorized to be levied pursuant to the special tax formula.
The special taxes herein authorized shall be collected in the same manner as ad valorem property
taxes and shall be subject to the same penalties, procedure, sale and lien priority in any case of
delinquency, as applicable for ad valorem taxes; however, as applicable, this legislative body may, by
resolution, establish and adopt an alternate or supplemental procedure as necessary. Any special taxes
that may not be collected on the County tax roll shall be collected through a direct billing procedure by the
Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, acting for and on behalf of the District.
Upon recordation of a Notice of Special Tax Lien pursuant to Section 3114.5 of the Streets and
Highways Code of the State of California, a continuing lien to secure each levy of the special tax shall
attach to all non-exempt real property in the Territory and this lien shall continue in force and effect until
the special tax obligation is prepaid and permanently satisfied and the lien canceled in accordance with
law or until collection of the tax by the legislative body ceases.
The maximum special tax rate authorized to be levied within the District shall not be increased as
a result of the annexation of the Territory to the District.
6. Public Hearing. NOTICE IS GIVEN THAT ON THE 18TH DAY OF MAY 2022, AT THE
HOUR OF 7:00 O'CLOCK P.M., IN THE REGULAR MEETING PLACE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS,
BEING THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA 91730, A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD WHERE THIS BOARD OF DIRECTORS WILL
CONSIDER THE AUTHORIZATION FOR THE ANNEXATION OF THE TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT,
THE PROPOSED RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF THE SPECIAL TAX TO BE LEVIED
WITHIN THE TERRITORY AND ALL OTHER MATTERS AS SET FORTH IN THIS RESOLUTION OF
Page 72
Resolution No. FD 2022-007 Page 3 of 11
INTENTION. THAT AT THE ABOVE-MENTIONED TIME AND PLACE FOR PUBLIC HEARING ANY
PERSONS INTERESTED, INCLUDING TAXPAYERS AND PROPERTY OWNERS, MAY APPEAR AND
BE HEARD, AND THAT THE TESTIMONY OF ALL INTERESTED PERSONS FOR OR AGAINST THE
ANNEXATION OF THE TERRITORY OR THE LEVYING OF SPECIAL TAXES WITHIN THE TERRITORY
WILL BE HEARD AND CONSIDERED.
ANY PROTESTS MAY BE MADE ORRALLY OR IN WRITING. HOWEVER, ANY PROTESTS
PERTAINING TO THE REGULARITY OR SUFFICIENCY OF THE PROCEEDINGS SHALL BE IN
WRITING AND SHALL CLEARLY SET FORTH THE IRREGULARITIES OR DEFECTS TO WHICH
OBJECTION IS MADE. ALL WRITTEN PROTESTS SHALL BE FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK PRIOR
TO THE TIME FIXED FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING. WRITTEN PROTESTS MAY BE WITHDRAWN AT
ANY TIME BEFORE THE CONCLUSION OF THE PUBLIC HEARING.
7. Majority Protest. If (a) 50% or more of the registered voters, or six (6) registered voters,
whichever is more, residing within the District, (b) 50% or more of the registered voters, or six (6) registered
voters, whichever is more, residing within the Territory, (c) owners of one-half or more of the area of land
in the territory included in the District, or (d) owners of one-half or more of the area of land included in the
Territory, file written protests against the proposed annexation of the Territory to the District and such
protests are not withdrawn so as to reduce the protests to less than a majority, no further proceedings shall
be undertaken for a period of one year from the date of the decision by the Board of Directors on the issues
discussed at the public hearing.
8. Election. If, following the public hearing described in the Section above, the Board of
Directors determines to proceed with the annexation of the Territory to the District, a proposition shall be
submitted to the qualified electors of the Territory. The vote shall be by registered voters within the
Territory; however, if there are less than 12 registered voters, the vote shall be by landowners, with each
landowner having one vote per acre or portion thereof within the Territory.
9. Notice. Notice of the time and place of the public hearing shall be given by the City Clerk
by causing the publication of a Notice of Public Hearing in a legally designated newspaper of general
circulation, said publication pursuant to Section 6061 of the Government Code, with said publication to be
completed at least seven (7) days prior to the date set for the public hearing.
A copy of this Resolution shall be transmitted to the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as
required by the Act.
Page 73
Resolution No. FD 2022-007 Page 4 of 11
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of , 2022.
Page 74
Resolution No. FD 2022-007 Page 5 of 11
EXHIBIT “A”
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1
ANNEXATION MAP
Page 75
Resolution No. FD 2022-007 Page 6 of 11
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1
BOUNDARY MAP
Page 76
Resolution No. FD 2022-007 Page 7 of 11
EXHIBIT “B”
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1
DESCRIPTION OF THE SERVICES AND FACILITIES
The Services.
It is the intention of the Board of Directors to finance certain types of fire services (the “Services”) that are
in addition to those currently provided in or require for the Territory and are necessary to meet the
increased demand for such fire services resulting from new development within the Territory and will not
be replacing services already available to the Territory. A general description of the Services to be financed
is as follows:
The performance of functions, operations, maintenance, and repair activities in order to
provide fire protection and suppression services to the Territory.
The Facilities.
It is the intension of this Board of Directors to finance the purchase, construction, expansion, improvement,
or rehabilitation of certain types of fire facilities (the “Facilities”) that are in addition to those currently
provided to serve the Territory and are necessary to meet the increased demand for such fire services
resulting from new development within the Territory and will not be replacing facilities already available to
serve the Territory. A general description of the types of the Facilities to be financed is as follows:
Fire protection and suppression facilities and equipment, rescue equipment, with a useful
life of five (5) years or more, including collection and accumulation of funds to pay for
anticipated facilities cost shortfalls and reserves for repair and replacement to the extent
that such facilities are necessary to meet the increased demand for such facilities resulting
from new development within the Territory.
Page 77
Resolution No. FD 2022-007 Page 8 of 11
EXHIBIT “C”
FOOTHILL FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1
RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAXES
The rate and method of apportionment, limitations on and adjustments to the Special Tax
authorized to be levied within Community Facilities District No. 85-1 (the “CFD No. 85-1 Rate and Method”)
as originally established for and as applied to the taxable properties within such community facilities district
is as follows:
SPECIAL TAX
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT
To pay for fire suppression services and to finance fire suppression facilities, the maximum Special
Tax in the Community Facilities District shall be:
Structures Maximum Annual Special Tax
Residential 1 DU $75.00
Multi-Family 2 DU: 1.75 ($75.00)
3 DU: 2.25 ($75.00)
4 DU: 2.65 ($75.00)
5-14 DU: 2.65 ($75.00) + [0.35 (TU-4) ($75.00)]
15-30 DU: 6.15 ($75.00) + [0.30 (TU-14) ($75.00)]
31-80 DU: 10.65 ($75.00) + [0.25 (TU-30) ($75.00)]
81 – up DU: 23.15 ($75.00) + [0.20 (TU-80) ($75.00)]
Commercial ($75.00) per acre + $0.04 per SF
Industrial ($75.00) per acre + $0.05 per SF
Note: DU = Dwelling Units
TU = Total Units
SF = Square Foot
Page 78
Resolution No. FD 2022-007 Page 9 of 11
ANNUAL ADJUSTMENT SPECIAL TAX
The maximum Special Tax shall be annually adjusted for (a) changes in cost of living or (b) changes
in cost of living and changes in population as defined in Section 7901 of the Government Code, as
amended, whichever is lesser.
REDUCTION IN SPECIAL TAX
Commercial and industrial structures shall be granted a reduction in the Special Tax for the
installation of complete sprinkler systems. In addition, multi-floor commercial and industrial structures shall
be granted a reduction in Special Tax for each separate floor above or below the main ground floor of the
structure.
LIMITATIONS ON TAX LEVY
The Special Tax shall only be levied on developed property; provided that the Special Tax shall not
be levied until a “Certification of Occupancy” or “Utility Release” has been issued by the appropriate
governmental agencies.
Developed property is defined to be property:
Which is not owned by a public or governmental agency
Which is not vacant
Where a certificate of occupancy or utility release from the City of Rancho Cucamonga or
the County of San Bernardino has been issued
Which has an existing building or structure onsite
Which does not have as its sole use power transmission towers, railroad tracks, and flood
control facilities – these properties are exempt. Areas granted as easements to power
transmission towers, railroad tracks, and flood control facilities shall be subtracted from the
total acreage of the underlying lot and shall be exempt.
The annual levy of the Special Tax shall be based upon an annual determination by the Board of
Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District of the amount of other revenues available to
meet budget requirements. As used in this formula, "available revenue" shall include ad valorem taxes,
State of California augmentation, tax increment revenues received from the Redevelopment Agency of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga and any other source of revenue except the Special Tax. The Board of
Directors shall take all responsible steps to retain maximum Redevelopment Agency funding to which, by
agreement, they may lawfully receive. To the extent available revenues are insufficient to meet budget
requirements, the Board of Directors may levy the Special Tax.
Page 79
Resolution No. FD 2022-007 Page 10 of 11
Application of the CFD No. 85-1 Rate and Method to Annexation No. 22-1
To pay for fire suppression services and to finance fire suppression facilities, the Maximum Special
Tax in Community Facilities District No. 85-1, Annexation No. 22-1 for Fiscal Year 2021-22 shall be:
Structures Maximum Annual Special Tax
Residential 1 DU $185.21
Multi-Family 2 DU: 1.75 ($185.21)
3 DU: 2.25 ($185.21)
4 DU: 2.65 ($185.21)
5-14 DU: 2.65 ($185.21) + [0.35 (TU-4) ($185.21)]
15-30 DU: 6.15 ($185.21) + [0.30 (TU-14) ($185.21)]
31-80 DU: 10.65 ($185.21) + [0.25 (TU-30) ($185.21)]
81 – up DU: 23.15 ($185.21) + [0.20 (TU-80) ($185.21)]
Commercial ($185.21) per acre + $0.096 per SF
Industrial ($185.21) per acre + $0.119 per SF
Note: DU = Dwelling Units
TU = Total Units
SF = Square Foot
ANNUAL ADJUSTMENT
The maximum Special Tax shall be annually adjusted commencing on July 1, 2021, and each July
1st thereafter for (a) changes in the cost of living or (b) changes in cost of living and changes in population
as defined in Section 7901 of the Government Code, as amended, whichever is lesser.
REDUCTION IN SPECIAL TAX
Commercial and industrial structures shall be granted a .01 cent reduction in the Special Tax for
the installation of complete sprinkler systems. In addition, multi-floor commercial and industrial structures
shall also be granted a .01 cent reduction (not cumulative) in Special Tax for each separate floor above or
below the main ground floor of the structure.
Page 80
Resolution No. FD 2022-007 Page 11 of 11
LIMITATION ON SPECIAL TAX LEVY
The Special Tax shall only be levied on developed property; provided that the Special Tax shall not
be levied until a “Certification of Occupancy” or “Utility Release” has been issued by the appropriate
governmental agencies.
Developed property is defined to be property:
Which is not owned by a public or governmental agency
Which is not vacant
Where a certificate of occupancy or utility release from the City of Rancho Cucamonga or
the County of San Bernardino has been issued
Which has an existing building or structure onsite
Which does not have as its sole use power transmission towers, railroad tracks, and flood
control facilities – these properties are exempt. Areas granted as easements to power
transmission towers, railroad tracks, and flood control facilities shall be subtracted from the
total acreage of the underlying lot and shall be exempt.
The annual levy of the Special Tax shall be based upon an annual determination by the Board of
Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District of the amount of other revenues available to
meet budget requirements. As used in this formula, "available revenue" shall include ad valorem taxes,
State of California augmentation, tax increment revenues received from the Redevelopment Agency of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga and any other source of revenue except the Special Tax. The Board of
Directors shall take all responsible steps to retain maximum Redevelopment Agency funding to which, by
agreement, they may lawfully receive. To the extent available revenues are insufficient to meet budget
requirements, the Board of Directors may levy the Special Tax.
For further particulars regarding the rate and method of apportionment of the Special Tax, reference
is made to the Final Report Mello-Roos Community Facilities District No. 85-1 for Fire Suppression
Facilities/Services – Foothill Fire Protection District, a copy of which is on file in the office of the Fire Chief
of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District.
Page 81
DATE:April 6, 2022
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services
Linda A. Troyan, MMC, Director of City Clerk Services
Patricia Bravo-Valdez, MMC, Deputy Director of City Clerk Services
SUBJECT:Consideration of Second Reading and Adoption of the following:
ORDINANCE NO. 997
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ADJUSTING THE BOUNDARIES OF THE FOUR CITY
COUNCIL DISTRICTS AND ADOPTING A NEW OFFICIAL COUNCIL
DISTRICT MAP FOR THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BASED
ON THE RESULTS OF THE 2020 DECENNIAL CENSUS
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council waive full reading and adopt Ordinance No. 997 by title
only.
BACKGROUND:
The introduction and first reading of the above-entitled Ordinance was conducted at the regular
Council Meeting of March 16, 2022. Votes at first reading: AYES: Kennedy, Hutchison, Scott,
Spagnolo, Michael.
ANALYSIS:
Please refer to the March 16, 2022 City Council staff report.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Please refer to the March 16, 2022 City Council staff report.
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:
Please refer to the March 16, 2022 City Council staff report.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 – Ordinance No. 997
Page 82
Ordinance No. 997 - Page 1 of 2
ORDINANCE NO. 997
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ADJUSTING THE BOUNDARIES OF THE FOUR
CITY COUNCIL DISTRICTS AND ADOPTING A NEW OFFICIAL
COUNCIL DISTRICT MAP FOR THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA BASED ON THE RESULTS OF THE 2020
DECENNIAL CENSUS
A. Recitals.
1. On November 8, 2016 the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 887 pursuant to
Government Code Sections 34871 and 34872 to add Chapter 2.11 to the Rancho Cucamonga
Municipal Code to provide for the by-district election of members of the City Council and at-large
election of the Mayor, adopt the official Council District Map for the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
establish the boundaries and identification number of each electoral district, and establish a
sequencing of elections for each Council District.
2. Pursuant to Elections Code Section 21601 and Section 2.11.050 of the Rancho
Cucamonga Municipal Code, the City Council is required to adjust the boundaries of any or all of
the Council Districts following each decennial federal census. Using the census as a basis, the
City Council must adjust the boundaries so that the Council Districts are as nearly equal in
population as practicable and in compliance with all applicable provisions of law, including the
United States and Federal Constitutions and the Federal Voting Rights Act of 1965 (52 U.S.C.
Section 10301 et seq.).
3. In accordance with Elections Code Section 21607 and 21607.1, the City Council
held public hearings on the drawing of district boundaries on September 15, 2021, November 3,
2021, January 19, 2022, February 2, 2022, and March 2, 2022. At each of the foregoing hearings,
the public was invited to provide input on the composition of the new Council District boundaries.
4. After closing the public hearing held on March 2, 2022, the City Council directed
staff to publish the revised map depicted in Exhibit “A” of this Ordinance based on the public input
received during the public hearings and return with the revised map and this Ordinance for first
reading at the March 16, 2022 City Council meeting. At the March 16, 2022 City Council meeting,
the City Council selected the map depicted in Exhibit “A” of this Ordinance and incorporated herein
by this reference as the official Council District Map for the City of Rancho Cucamonga and
introduced this Ordinance for first reading. Demographic data supporting the map based on the
2020 Census is attached hereto as Exhibit “B” of this Ordinance and incorporated herein by this
reference.
B. Ordinance.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1. The map attached hereto as Exhibit “A” to this Ordinance is hereby
approved and adopted as the Official Council District Map for the City of Rancho Cucamonga and
shall be used in the 2022 general municipal election and all such elections for City Council
thereafter, until further amended.
ATTACHMENT 1
Page 83
Ordinance No. 997 - Page 2 of 2
SECTION 2. Section 2.11.020 of Chapter 2.11 of the Municipal Code is hereby
amended to read as follows:
“2.11.020 City Council Districts Established. The boundaries for the four (4) City
Council districts and the identification number of each district shall be as described on
the Official Council District Map for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, attached as Exhibit
“A” to Ordinance No. 997 and incorporated herein by this reference. A copy of the
Council District Map is on file in the Office of the City Clerk.”
SECTION 3. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or
portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unenforceable by a court of
competent jurisdiction, the remaining portions of this Ordinance shall nonetheless remain in full
force and effect. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby declares that it would
have adopted each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance,
irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases,
or portions of this Ordinance be declared invalid or unenforceable.
SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall
cause the same to be published in the manner prescribed by law.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this day of , 2022.
_____________________________________
L. Dennis Michael, Mayor
ATTEST:
_____________________________
City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) ss
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA )
I, JANICE REYNOLDS, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify
that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga held on the _____ day of _______________, 2022, and was passed at a
regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the ______ day of
______________, 2022, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSTAINED: COUNCILMEMBERS:
Page 84
EXHIBIT A
Page 85
District 1
Total Pop 45,162
Deviation from ideal 1,460
% Deviation 3.34%
% Hisp 34.7%
% NH White 47%
% NH Black 5%
% Asian-American 10%
Total 33,080
% Hisp 30%
% NH White 58%
% NH Black 4%
% Asian/Pac.Isl.7%
Total 31,704
% Latino est.28%
% Spanish-Surnamed 26%
% Asian-Surnamed 4%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est.65%
% NH Black 4%
Total 27,007
% Latino est.27%
% Spanish-Surnamed 25%
% Asian-Surnamed 3%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est.66%
% NH Black 4%
Total 19,395
% Latino est.23%
% Spanish-Surnamed 21%
% Asian-Surnamed 3%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est.70%
% NH Black est.4%
ACS Pop. Est.Total 44,739
age0-19 24%
age20-60 52%
age60plus 24%
immigrants 15%
naturalized 70%
english 76%
spanish 16%
asian-lang 4%
other lang 4%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well"8%
hs-grad 47%
bachelor 20%
graduatedegree 14%
Child in Household child-under18 33%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+employed 64%
income 0-25k 12%
income 25-50k 12%
income 50-75k 15%
income 75-200k 50%
income 200k-plus 12%
single family 84%
multi-family 16%
rented 25%
owned 75%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.
Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.
Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH
Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American
Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data.
2
43,607
-95
-0.22%
48%
25%
13%
11%
30,926
44%
31%
15%
8%
21,769
43%
39%
4%
2%
38%
16%
17,001
41%
37%
4%
2%
39%
16%
10,005
38%
35%
3%
2%
43%
16%
44,675
26%
60%
14%
21%
59%
59%
29%
7%
5%
15%
52%
17%
7%
35%
63%
17%
23%
17%
39%
4%
50%
50%
59%
41%
3
42,439
-1,263
-2.89%
34%
31%
12%
21%
29,010
36%
33%
16%
13%
23,793
32%
29%
7%
3%
43%
18%
19,668
31%
28%
7%
3%
43%
18%
12,316
29%
27%
5%
2%
47%
18%
43,209
28%
58%
14%
23%
65%
67%
16%
11%
6%
13%
39%
26%
18%
39%
69%
9%
11%
14%
56%
10%
63%
37%
48%
52%
4
43,601
-101
-0.23%
33%
35%
9%
22%
30,099
31%
42%
9%
17%
27,765
30%
27%
8%
2%
51%
10%
23,409
29%
27%
8%
2%
52%
10%
15,372
27%
25%
6%
2%
56%
10%
44,048
28%
54%
18%
21%
67%
67%
17%
9%
7%
9%
45%
24%
16%
45%
67%
7%
11%
12%
52%
19%
90%
10%
20%
80%
Total
174,809
2,723
6.23%
37%
34%
10%
16%
123,115
35%
41%
11%
11%
105,031
32%
30%
6%
2%
51%
11%
87,085
31%
29%
5%
2%
52%
11%
57,088
28%
26%
4%
2%
56%
11%
176,670
26%
56%
18%
20%
65%
67%
19%
8%
6%
11%
46%
21%
14%
38%
66%
11%
14%
14%
49%
11%
71%
29%
38%
62%
02/27/2022 21:52 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2018)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
EXHIBIT B
Page 86
DATE:April 6, 2022
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Jennifer Nakamura, Deputy Director of Planning
Mike Smith, Principal Planner
SUBJECT:Discussion, Consideration and Possible Action to Introduce, Waive
Reading of and Adopt by a Four- fifths Vote, Interim Urgency Ordinance
No. 999, Extending for an Additional Year (365 days) through April 20,
2023, an Existing Moratorium on the Approval of Applications for Building
Permits or Other Entitlements for New Service Station Uses or the
Expansion of Existing Service Station Uses in the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, Declaring the Urgency thereof and Making a Determination
of Exemption Under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
(INTERIM URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. 999) (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the City Council adopt Interim Ordinance No. 999 entitled "An Interim Urgency
Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Enacted Pursuant to Government
Code Section 65858 Extending for an Additional One Year, Through April 20, 2023, an Existing
Moratorium on the Approval of Applications for Building Permits or Other Entitlements for New
Service Station Uses or the Expansion of Existing Service Station Uses in the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, Declaring the Urgency Thereof and Making A Determination of Exemption Under
the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)," by four-fifths vote, waive full reading, and read
by title only.
BACKGROUND:
At the regular City Council meeting of March 17, 2021, the City Council directed the City Manager
to research and compile information about service stations in the City related to the following
topics of concern:
The number and location of existing service stations in the city;
Analysis of the land use benefits of service stations to the community;
Analysis of the fiscal benefits of service stations and how this compares to other retail uses;
Land use impacts of service stations on the surrounding commercial districts and/or residential
neighborhoods;
Costs to the City of providing service at service station locations, particularly calls for public
safety services;
Land use policies that will be included in the General Plan update the City is currently
preparing and which will be available in draft form within the next month; and
Possible performance stations and/or conditions that could be placed on service station
projects in the future.
Page 87
Page 2
1
2
0
1
On April 21, 2021, the City Council conducted a special study session during which they received
a report prepared by staff that described the impacts of service stations in the City. The City
Council then discussed these impacts, the moratorium’s purpose, and the applicability/timing of
a proposed moratorium on new or expanded service stations. At their regular meeting on that
date, the City Council subsequently adopted Urgency Ordinance No. 980 establishing an interim
urgency zoning Ordinance, pursuant to Government Code Section 65858, establishing a
moratorium on the approval of applications for building permits or other entitlements for new
service station uses or the expansion of existing service station uses in the City. The temporary
interim urgency ordinance was extended by 10 months, 15 days, to April 20, 2022 on June 2,
2021 (as it would have expired on June 5, 2021 otherwise).
The moratorium does not apply to:
a. the improvement, renovation, or demolition of an existing service station, provided that the
development otherwise conforms to applicable law, does not result in an increase to the
number of gas/fuel pumps, does not add any new accessory uses on site, and does not
require a discretionary entitlement to perform such improvement, renovation, or demolition; or
b. An application for a service station that has been deemed Complete or received all
discretionary entitlements as of the moratorium’s effective date, provided that the City has
issued a building permit for construction or redevelopment of the proposed service station
within six months of the moratorium’s effective date (April 21, 2021).
Staff notes that applications for the expansion of existing service station uses in the City submitted
during the moratorium may be subject to permanent development standards that are adopted
during the moratorium or after the moratorium expires .
ANALYSIS:
The City adopted an updated General Plan on December 15, 2021. The new General Plan
incorporates a refined set of goals and policies to implement the City’s vision for land and
economic development. It also included new land use designations that the development of new
service stations may be inconsistent with. To implement the goals and policies of the General
Plan, the City is now in the process of updating the Zoning Map and the Development Code to
incorporate appropriate land use regulations and technical/design standards for all types of
development within the City.
As a part of this effort, the City is in the process of identifying updates that will specifically address
the development and operation of service stations. In considering land use and zoning provisions
for service stations, staff has been, and will continue to, evaluate whether the City’s residents and
visitors are adequately served by the 32 existing service stations in the City and 2 other service
stations that are under construction. This will assist in determining whether there is a need for
more service stations. Or, if the needs of the City are being met, that the City has reached a
saturation point with service stations. As the City becomes more “built-out” there is less vacant
land available for development that will fulfill the City Council’s and community’s vision for ‘A
World Class Community’.
Thus, the answers to this evaluation also will be critical in shaping the next phase of development,
and the pattern of that development, in the City for decades into the future. Most of the remaining
vacant land in the City is surrounded by existing development that are considered “sensitive” uses
such as residential neighborhoods, schools, and parks. As a result, it has become more important
Page 88
Page 3
1
2
0
1
and relevant to consider surrounding uses and context/compatibility when reviewing proposals
for service stations. Their location near sensitive uses increases the risk of contaminant exposure
to vulnerable populations. This problem is magnified in instances where a service station may
become obsolete and become a “brownfield” site, i.e. a property of which the expansion,
redevelopment, or reuse may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of a
hazardous substance(s), pollutant(s), or contaminant(s). Exposure to the types of contaminants
that are present, or are potentially present, at service stations threatens the public health, safety
or welfare of neighboring sensitive uses.
This outcome is not accounted for in the City’s current land use regulations and, as a result, they
will be updated. A disproportionate amount of the City’s existing service stations uses are
concentrated in the southwest and central areas of the City. The proliferation of service stations
in these areas of the City inequitably increases health risks for the residents of in these locations
due to the potential contaminants present at service stations. Under consideration will be where
service station uses are designated as a permitted or conditionally permitted use in the City’s
General Plan and Zoning Map, and how such uses are regulated in the Development Code. The
purpose of this will be minimize the undue concentration of service stations in any one area of the
City. The updates to these documents also will include an analysis of the land use compatibility
of service stations with sensitive uses. Further analysis will be conducted on the contribution of
service stations to the fiscal vitality of the City and demand for public safety services generated
by service stations.
These topics are further discussed below:
1. Staff is researching the fiscal impacts of existing service stations in the City. Staff will be
evaluating, for example, the sales tax revenue of each of the existing and potential service
stations in the City and comparing their fiscal performance with other commercial uses that
could potentially be developed on the property. Based on staff’s preliminary analysis, the
collective sales tax revenue of the existing service stations in the City has been generally
trending downward. Staff also will be researching, for example, the tax revenue generated by
service stations in other cities to see how they compare the revenue generated in the City.
Note that trends in changing technology may further erode and depress sales tax revenue. As
part of staff’s efforts, there will be an evaluation of service stations fiscal performance in this
context and whether such uses could become obsolete. Staff will also be evaluating the fiscal
performance of service stations relative to the demand on public safety services (and the cost
to provide them);
2. Staff is researching the demand for public safety services generated by existing service
stations in the City. Based on staff’s preliminary analysis using data provided by the San
Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department, total calls for service of any kind at service stations
in the City have generally increased since 2016. There were 637 calls for service in 2016
compared to 1,059 calls for service in 2020. Data for 2021 is incomplete (but will be
researched further to include the latter half of 2021 and 2022 to date) but by that point in time
there were 135 calls for service. Over that 5-year period, this equates to an average of about
924 calls for service. Similarly, the time spent by deputies on these calls during the same
period has increased from about 1,101 hours to about 2,455 hours. The average amount of
time spent on location is about 1,870 hours. The number of calls for service and the time spent
at service stations cause public safety resources to be used in a likely inefficient and
potentially unsustainable manner.
Page 89
Page 4
1
2
0
1
Furthermore, service stations draw away an important and critical service from other areas of
the City. Up to June 2021, there were a combined total of 4,754 calls for service for all service
stations. The total calls for service are not equal among the various service stations. It is not
yet clear why this disparity exists. As part of the evaluation of the demand for public safety
services, staff will reach-out to representatives from the Sheriff’s Department to determine
what they believe are the underlying causes for the increase in calls and time spent on
location. Staff will also be researching the operating characteristics of all 32 service stations
(and eventually the 2 service stations that are under construction) in the City.
3. Staff believes that the disparity in total calls for service may be due to service stations having
different operating characteristics. For example, if a service station sells alcohol; is open 24
hours; has accessory uses such as a car wash or a restaurant; or provides services such as
vehicle repair, then staff will utilize that information to determine the relationship with demands
on public safety resources. If necessary, staff will develop new regulations and standards that
will allow public safety resources to be used more efficiently and sustainably.
Staff is researching how conventional service stations may be affected by:
a. Advancements in electric vehicle (EV) technology such as increases in their range due
to more efficient batteries;
b. The adoption of EVs as a practical alternative to fossil fuel powered vehicles due to
the introduction of chargers that bring the batteries of EVs to a full charge faster or
batteries that have the capacity to power heavier vehicles such as trucks;
c. The availability of a variety different mobility options, or the preference for them, such
as ridesharing services and mass transit; and
d. New government regulations restricting or prohibiting the sale of vehicles with
conventional combustion engines at a specified time in the future.
4. Staff is drafting amendments to the Development Code, and other relevant documents as
necessary, related to technical/design standards and requirements for service stations within
the City for consideration by the Planning Commission and City Council by April 2023. As part
of this process, staff will be developing new regulations such as those that would, for example,
regulate physical requirements such as the number of service stations at street intersections
and the minimum distance, or separation, between services stations; regulate operating
conditions such as the hours that service stations are open and whether they sell alcohol; and
determine what accessory uses or services could (or if the City prefers, should) be included
with service stations such as the sale of fresh food.
5. As part of this effort, staff has been reviewing the municipal/development codes of neighboring
jurisdictions to determine how they regulate service stations and the technical/design
standards that those communities apply to them. Similarly, staff has been researching how
older, built-out communities manage service stations within their jurisdictions. When possible,
staff will contact their counterparts at these other jurisdictions to discuss their experiences
with service stations.
The City Council issued a 10-Day report on March 16, 2022 per Section 65858(d) of the California
Government Code that described these actions in order to extend the interim urgency ordinance
currently in effect.
Page 90
Page 5
1
2
0
1
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:
The measures taken to alleviate the need for the moratorium established by Interim Ordinance
No. 980 will ensure that the City will fulfill its mission and vision as guided by the City Council’s
core values such as providing and nurturing a high quality of life; promoting and enhancing a safe
and healthy community; intentionally embracing and anticipating the future; and relentlessly
pursuing improvement.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 – City Council Staff Report (dated 04/21/2021)
Attachment 2 – City Council Staff Report (dated 06/02/2021)
Attachment 3 – Ordinance No. 980
Attachment 4 - City Council Staff Report (dated 05/05/2021)
Attachment 5 – Ordinance No. 981
Attachment 6 – Ordinance No. 999
Page 91
DATE: April 21, 2021
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Anne McIntosh, AICP, Planning Director
Mike Smith, Principal Planner
SUBJECT:Discussion of Service Stations in Rancho Cucamonga and Consideration
of Urgency Zoning Ordinance No. 980, to Establish an Interim Urgency
Zoning Ordinance to Establish a Moratorium for a Period of 45 Days on
the Approval of Building Permits or Other Entitlements for New Service
Station Uses or the Expansion of Existing Service Station Uses.
(INTERIM URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. 980) (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:
At the April 21, 2021, 7:00 PM, Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, Council Chambers, staff recommends the City Council discuss the status of service
station uses in the City of Rancho Cucamonga and adopt Urgency Ordinance No. 980 entitled
"An Interim Urgency Zoning Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
Enacted Pursuant to Government Code Section 65858 Establishing a Moratorium on The
Approval of Applications for Building Permits or other Entitlements for New Service Station Uses
or the Expansion of Existing Service Station Uses in the City of Rancho Cucamonga”, by four-
fifths vote, waive full reading, and read by title only.
BACKGROUND:
The City currently has received applications for four service station projects that are currently
under review. They are all located in the southwest area of the City, generally referred to as the
“Cucamonga neighborhood,” that is bound by Foothill Boulevard, Haven Avenue, 4th Street, and
the City’s boundaries with the cities of Ontario and Upland. Planning staff has also received
multiple inquiries in recent months about the possibility of adding alcohol sales at other existing
service stations in the City and thereby increasing the intensity of this use. The increase in the
number of applications for service station uses, combined with a decrease in submittals for other
types of general commercial uses and the concentration of service stations in one particular area
of the City, has raised concerns. This includes questions about the impacts this might have on
the City’s long-term land use and economic development goals, and how service stations benefit
or impact the districts in which they are located.
At the regular City Council meeting of March 17, 2021, the City Council directed the City Manager
to research and compile information about service stations in the City of Rancho Cucamonga
related to the following topics of concern:
Attachment 1
Page 92
Page 2
7
0
0
The number and location of existing service stations in the city;
Analysis of the land use benefits of service stations to the community;
Analysis of the fiscal benefits of service stations and how this compares to other retail
uses;
Land use impacts of service stations on the surrounding commercial districts and/or
residential neighborhoods;
Costs to the City of providing service at service station locations, particularly calls for public
safety services;
Land use policies that will be included in the General Plan update the City is currently
preparing and which will be available in draft form within the next month; and
Possible performance stations and\/or conditions that could be placed on service station
projects in the future.
This report addresses some of this data/analysis. And, these are issues that City staff would
continue to research and study during the term of the proposed moratorium.
ANALYSIS:
“Service stations” are, as the name indicates, a service use that meets the needs of both residents
and travelers in the city. From our own experience, we can understand the value of being able to
purchase service and get basic automobile services in convenient locations within a reasonable
distance of home or work. There are 32 active service stations in the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
which is approximately 0.69 service stations per square mile. There are two additional sites that
have been approved to open/reopen but which have not received building permits yet.
Attachment 1 shows the location of existing service stations and their distribution across the city.
The distance of any service station from most homes in the developed part of the city is within
five minutes “drive time” as shown in Attachment 2. The majority of the existing service stations
are located in commercial centers and generally isolated from nearby residential properties.
However, some of these service stations are located in, or adjacent to, residential neighborhoods.
For example, one proposed application for a new service station and associated convenience
store would be located directly across the street from an existing multi-family residential complex
on Archibald Avenue.
In considering land use and zoning provisions for service stations, it is reasonable to ask if Rancho
Cucamonga is adequately served by the existing service station locations to meet the basic needs
and expectations of our residents and visitors. This is an important question because the city is
becoming more “built-out” with less vacant land available for development that helps us meet the
Council and community’s vision for a world class community. Also, much of the remaining vacant
land is surrounded by existing development which can be residential neighborhoods or schools
and parks where children are at play. One proposed service station project would be located
directly adjacent to a school on Archibald Avenue. It has become increasingly important to
consider surrounding uses and context/compatibility when reviewing proposals for service
stations. In the absence of an industry standard, staff has considered the following points when
considering whether or not the number and/or distribution of service stations is appropriate:
General Plan and Development Code: The current General Plan was adopted in 2010
and the Development Code was comprehensively updated in 2012. The City is currently in
the process of updating both documents. As part of this update, staff is evaluating the
goals/policies and regulations that relate to existing/potential development and land uses in
the city. Staff has observed that neither existing document adequately addresses certain
Page 93
Page 3
7
0
0
types of development such as service stations that may be incompatible with, for example,
residential neighborhoods. In some zones, service stations are permitted without
discretionary review. And there are very few performance standards for service stations in
our current Development Code. The definition of service station itself, does not consider forms
of fuel, and is outdated. The definition of the use should be refined to contemplate how natural
gas and electric vehicle fueling stations are treated under the City’s zoning regulations.
Further, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has classified service stations and fuel
storage locations as uses that may result in a brownfield site. Brownfield sites are properties,
the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence or
potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant. Common
contaminants found at service station sites include gasoline, diesel, and petroleum oil, volatile
organic compounds and solvents, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, and lead. Exposure to
the types of contaminants present, or potentially present, at service stations threatens the
public health, safety or welfare of neighboring communities.
The PlanRC General Plan Update and subsequent Development Code update effort is
expected to be adopted in the winter of 2021/2022.
The City is reviewing applications for proposed service stations at the southwest corner of
Archibald Avenue and 9th Street (7-Eleven project), and at the northeast corner of Arrow Route
and Grove Avenue. The applications for both projects were submitted within the last year, but
have not received final review; the 7-Eleven project has been recommended for approval by
the Planning Commission. The construction plans for a previously approved “reactivation” of
a closed service station at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route are
under review. There is also a service station that is being reconstructed/redeveloped at the
intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Red Hill Country Club Drive. These are both in the
building plan check review process. Inquiries have also been received about developing
service stations at Vineyard Avenue and 8th Street, Foothill Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue,
and Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue.
The City has identified in the General Plan numerous major street intersections as sites for
intensive “gateway” development such as offices, hotels, and large commercial centers. The
purpose of this is to achieve and maintain the City’s goal of being “A World Class Community.”
As companies/operators of service stations desire locations that are highly visible to potential
customers, they often select sites that are located at these same street intersections (such as
those noted above). The development of service stations at these major intersections is
contrary to this particular goal.
As indicated above, there are currently 34 service stations in the city, two of which are inactive
and under redevelopment. For purposes of comparison, within the cities of Fontana, Ontario,
and Upland there are 21, 20, and 17 service stations, respectively. This is significantly fewer
per square mile than in Rancho Cucamonga, for Fontana and Ontario, but greater in Upland,
which has 1.09 per square mile. As noted previously and shown in Attachment 2, most areas
of Rancho Cucamonga are within five minutes “drive time” of a service station.
A disproportionate amount of the city’s existing service stations are concentrated in the
southwest and central areas of the city. Thirteen service stations are located in District 2 and
eleven are located in District 3. In contrast, there are only five service stations (each) within
Districts 1 and 4. The proliferation of service stations in Districts 2 and 3 inequitably increases
health risks for the residents within those districts due to potential contaminants present at
Page 94
Page 4
7
0
0
service stations. From an environmental justice perspective, how service stations are
permitted and regulated needs to be considered under the City’s General Plan and
Development Code to avoid an undue concentration of them in any one part of the city.
Due to the relatively large number of service stations that exist and have been proposed in
the city, staff believes that a moratorium is warranted to evaluate whether more service
stations are in the public interest, further the goals of the PlanRC General Plan update and
balance the public benefit with potential public safety and environmental costs.
Operational Impacts: Currently, there are no operational nor technical standards in the
development code regarding service stations. Thus, staff has limited tools available to
effectively address the impacts caused by service station development and ensure that no
adverse impacts occur from new service stations.
The City has the opportunity now to develop more detailed standards and operational
requirements in the Development Code update currently underway. Examples would include
regulating hours of operation, lighting, and security/safety, proximity to neighboring
development such as residences, vehicles queueing onto an adjacent street or in a parking
lot which could interfere with traffic circulation and public safety access; noise generated by
vehicle engines and/or customers; and glare caused by canopy lights.
If passed, a moratorium would allow staff to evaluate the typical operations of a service station
in greater detail, the technical standards that should apply to them, and, incorporate necessary
requirements and regulations that will minimize their operational and site development
impacts.
Fiscal Considerations: Service stations generate tax revenue primarily from the sale of
gasoline, as shown in Attachment 3.
Based on the data in Attachment 3 that shows the annual tax revenue for the City between
2008 and 2020, revenue has fluctuated and ranges from a high of $2.4 million in 2012 to a
low of $1.5 million in 2020. This results in an average revenue of about $2.0 million per year.
When accounting for the impacts of reduced demand for fuel caused by travel restrictions
imposed due to the COVID pandemic in 2020 (and therefore not including that year in the
calculation as an acknowledgement that 2020 was an anomalous year), the average revenue
between 2008 and 2019 is about $1.9 million. Nevertheless, there clearly has been a decline
in demand overall and, in turn, sales tax revenue that is generated.
There is evidence suggesting that the above-noted tax revenue will decline over time in part
due to the availability and preference of alternative energy sources for powering an
automobile. For example, electric cars powered by batteries are becoming more
commonplace. It is estimated that by 2030, more than a one third of all new vehicles sold will
be fully or partially electric powered (via batteries). As battery charging can occur at home,
work, or in parking lots, the need for service stations is likely to decline in a corresponding
manner. The declining demand for gasoline due to changes in technology and consumer
preferences may increase competition among the existing service stations in the City such
that closures may occur over time. Interestingly, some studies suggest that the decline in
tobacco sales and paper maps, also contribute to declining revenues at service stations.
Furthermore, as hydrogen, liquid petroleum service (LPG), compressed natural service
(CNG), and biofuels become more readily adopted as power sources for automobiles,
Page 95
Page 5
7
0
0
conventional service stations could potentially become obsolete or unable to provide the
demand for these alternative fuels. Also, ride sharing services such as Uber, Lyft, and Zipcar
are now a feasible and, frequently, a preferred alternative to personal vehicles. The
preference of mobility alternatives is expected to increase in the future. That will result in
reduced personal automobile usage which will, in turn, reduce demand for service stations of
any kind. Both the use of alternative fuels and ride sharing will result in service stations
becoming fiscal “underperformers.”
Possibly reflecting this decline in demand, the applicants for a previously approved
“reactivation” of a service station located at the northeast corner of Arrow Route and Archibald
Avenue have not obtained permits to reconstruct and operate it despite receiving entitlements,
i.e. Planning Commission approval, to do so several years ago. Staff believes this presents
an example of the concerns that a potentially obsolete land use, and the property where it is
located, will not contribute to the fiscal goals of the City.
There is merit in considering the fiscal impacts of former service station sites becoming
“brownfield” sites. Former service stations will require significant investment to remediate any
potential ground contamination prior to redevelopment. Inactive/closed sites may be
abandoned and left unused for years. The removal of contaminants may present health risks
for neighboring sensitive receptors.
Lastly, as described in further detail below, there are fiscal impacts related to public safety.
The fiscal impact of public safety calls for service and the time spent at the service stations is
important to consider. The fully-loaded cost (including benefits, equipment and overhead) for
a full-time deputy is about $337,000 per year, or $162 per hour. Thus, when averaging the
period between 2016 and 2020 the total annual fiscal impact to the City when responding to
service calls at all service stations was about $302,940. This is equates to approximately 15%
of the revenue generated by these services stations on just calls for service by the Police
Department.
Public Safety: The demand for public safety services is shown in Attachment 4. Based on
data provided by the San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department, total calls for service of
any kind at service stations in the City have generally increased since 2016. There were 637
calls for service in 2016 compared to 1,059 calls for service in 2020. Data for 2021 is
incomplete but thus far there has been 135 calls for service. Over that period of 5 years
(2016-2020), this equates to an average of about 924 calls for service. Similarly, the time
spent by deputies on these calls (during the same 5-year period) has increased from about
1,101 hours to about 2,455 hours with an average amount of about 1,870 hours on location.
The number of calls for service and the time spent at these service stations result in public
safety resources being used in a manner that is likely inefficient and potentially not
sustainable. These service stations draw away an important and critical service from other
areas of the City. It should be noted that the total calls for service is not equal among the
various service stations as shown in Attachment 5. The lowest average amount of calls
between 2016 and 2020 is 6.6 calls (each) at the service stations located at 7996 Archibald
Avenue and 10477 Lemon Avenue that are operated by Shell and Mobil, respectively. The
highest average amount of calls during that same period of time is 68 calls at the service
station located at 8808 Foothill Boulevard (Shell). It is not yet clear why there is a disparity in
the number of service calls. There has been a combined total of 4,754 calls for service
(including 2021 to date) for all service stations.
Page 96
Page 6
7
0
0
CONCLUSION:
The analysis of issues related to service stations makes clear that service stations pose a threat
to public health, safety, and welfare and the City must evaluate new regulations to address that
threat. This could range from additional standards in the development code to limitations on future
service station locations. Staff supports the adoption of an urgency interim ordinance in order to
study and develop those regulations, as follows.
PROPOSED MORATORIUM:
The City Council has the option of adopting an interim urgency ordinance based on the information
provided in this report. Government Code Section 65858 provides:
“Without following the procedures otherwise required prior to the adoption of a zoning
ordinance, the legislative body of a…city…to protect the public safety, health, and welfare,
may adopt as an urgency measure an interim ordinance prohibiting any uses that may be
in conflict with a contemplated General Plan, Specific Plan, or Zoning proposal that the
legislative body, Planning Commission or the Planning Department is considering or
studying or intends to study within a reasonable time. That urgency measure shall require
a four-fifths vote of the legislative body for adoption. The interim ordinance shall be of no
further force and effect 45 days from its date of adoption. After notice pursuant to Section
65090 and public hearing, the legislative body may extend the interim ordinance for 10
months and 15 days and subsequently extend the interim ordinance for one year. Any
extension shall also require a four-fifths vote for adoption. Not more than two extensions
may be adopted.”
The City has an obligation to ensure that all development minimizes impacts and that the benefits
to existing and future residents are maximized. Staff believes there is a current and immediate
threat to the public health, safety and welfare that is presented by proposals to expand and/or
develop new service stations and that a moratorium is necessary. The Development Code refers
to “gas stations” as “service stations.” The proposed interim urgency ordinance that would adopt
the moratorium uses the latter term.
The City is proposing a moratorium that will apply to the issuance of building permits and other
land use entitlements, such as, new Design Review and Conditional Use Permit applications for
service stations within the City. This will allow time to evaluate the General Plan, the Development
Code, and the Zoning map (where applicable/necessary) to develop appropriate regulations to
achieve a reasonable level of assurances that there will not be serious negative impacts to the
overall Community and ensure a positive and mutually acceptable set of outcomes for the City’s
residents, business community, property owners, and service station developers. The
moratorium will not apply to the limited improvement or renovation of an existing service station
such as interior modifications, exterior repainting, and general maintenance, or the demolition of
an existing service station.
The moratorium will allow for a comprehensive analysis of service stations during which staff will
analyze the compatibility of service stations with neighboring land uses, the impact and demand
on public safety resources, and other appropriate regulations.
Pursuant to Government Code Section 65858, the initial term of the moratorium is 45 days
(expiring on June 5, 2021). Staff does not anticipate completing the work required to incorporate
new service station development regulations into the General Plan and Development Code within
this 45-day period. Therefore, staff expects to bring a further ordinance to extend the term of the
moratorium for up to 10 months, 15 days. Ten days before the proposed extension, staff will
Page 97
Page 7
7
0
0
provide a report to the City Council for consideration that identifies steps to address the potential
impacts caused by service station development during the moratorium’s initial term.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 – Map of the Locations of Existing and Previously Approved Service Stations
Attachment 2 – Map of the Proximity of Service Stations (Five Minute “Drive Time”) to Areas of
the City
Attachment 3 – Fiscal Analysis
Attachment 4 – Spreadsheet Public Safety Calls for Service
Attachment 5 – Map of Service Stations Identifying the Range of Calls for Service
Attachment 6 – Draft Urgency Ordinance No. 980
Page 98
Approved
Not Operational
Approved
Not Operational
Esri, NASA, NGA, USGS, FEMA, City of Rancho Cucamonga, Esri, HERE, Garmin, SafeGraph, METI/NASA,
USGS, Bureau of Land Management, EPA, NPS, USDA
G a s S t a t i o n s1 " = 3 , 4 0 0 f e e t
0 0.5 10.25
Miles
Gas Stations by Alcohol Sales
Sells alcohol
Does not sell alcohol
Council District 1 has 5 Stations
Council District 2 has 13 Stations
Council District 3 has 11 Stations
Council District 4 has 5 Stations Attachment 1
Page 99
Approved
Not Operational
Approved
Not Operational
Esri, NASA, NGA, USGS, FEMA, City of Rancho Cucamonga, Esri, HERE, Garmin, SafeGraph, METI/NASA,
USGS, Bureau of Land Management, EPA, NPS, USDA
5 M i n u t e D r i v e T i m e
f r o m G a s S t a t i o n s1 " = 5 , 2 8 0 f e e t
0 10.5
Miles
Legend
Gas Stations
5.0 Minutes
Attachment 2
Page 100
Service Station – Annual Sales Tax Revenue Analysis
(2008 – 2020)
Year Annual Sales Tax Revenue 2008 $2,041,400.68 2009 $1,615,184.14 2010 $1,868,335.21 2011 $2,238,239.53 2012 $2,426,457.82 2013 $2,261,404.95 2014 $2,244,070.71 2015 $2,049,208.59 2016 $1,768,133.12 2017 $1,816,753.47 2018 $2,031,354.18 2019 $2,194,465.74 2020 $1,496,374.00
$-
$0.50
$1.00
$1.50
$2.00
$2.50
$3.00
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020Millions
Attachment 3
Page 101
TOTAL CALLS FOR SERVICE 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 5 YEAR AVERAGE
At Service Stations 637 910 1034 979 1059 923.8
City Overall 146,254 159,059 155,537 151,562 142,344 150,951
Percentage of Calls at Service Stations
Relative to the City (overall)0.44%0.57%0.66%0.65%0.74%0.61%
TIME SPENT ON LOCATION
(HOURS)2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 5 YEAR AVERAGE
At Service Stations 1,100.75 1,867.44 1,982.12 1,946.32 2,455.44 1,870.41
City Overall 158,217.34 227,420.26 220,288.82 231,371.81 216,508.65 210,761.38
Percentage of Time at Service Stations
Relative to the City (overall)0.70%0.82%0.90%0.84%1.13%0.88%
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 (to date)Total 2016-2020 Average
TOTAL CALLS FOR SERVICE
(BY LOCATION)637 910 1,034 979 1,059 135 4,754 923.80
TOTAL REPORTS PREPARED
(BY LOCATION)109 157 174 176 166 24 806 156.40
32 15 38 31 26 2 144 28.40
9 15 38 31 26 2 121 23.80
2 5 11 8 7 2 35 6.60
1 5 11 8 7 2 34 6.40
16 30 43 73 85 10 257 49.40
3 30 43 73 85 10 244 46.80
2 21 16 29 20 2 90 17.60
2 21 16 29 20 2 90 17.60
9 5 20 9 7 2 52 10.00
4 5 20 9 7 2 47 9.00
0 21 41 78 95 12 247 47.00
0 21 41 78 95 12 247 47.00
19 24 27 23 23 5 121 23.20
7 24 27 23 23 5 109 20.80
41 39 31 35 41 7 194 37.40
14 39 31 35 41 7 167 32.00
1 21 24 27 41 3 117 22.80
1 21 24 27 41 3 117 22.80
63 65 48 55 56 6 293 57.40
25 65 48 55 56 6 255 49.80
44 57 79 64 69 9 322 62.60
10 57 79 64 69 9 288 55.80
26 27 12 20 13 3 101 19.60
8 27 12 20 13 3 83 16.00
13 21 19 15 8 2 78 15.20
7 21 19 15 8 2 72 14.00
37 76 64 69 44 6 296 58.00
14 76 64 69 44 6 273 53.40
6 12 4 4 7 2 35 6.60
3 12 4 4 7 2 32 6.00
23 28 38 34 28 5 156 30.20
9 28 38 34 28 5 142 27.40
5 5 0 0 0 0 10 2.00
2 5 0 0 0 0 7 1.40
8 14 8 9 26 3 68 13.00
3 14 8 9 26 3 63 12.00
11) 12925 Arrow Rte
Incomplete Data
Incomplete Data
6) 11800 4th St
7) 11920 Foothill Blvd
8) 12340 Highland Ave
9) 12576 Base Line Rd
10) 12659 Foothill Blvd
1) 10075 Arrow Rte
2) 10477 Lemon Ave
3) 10550 Town Center Dr
4) 11289 Base Line Rd
5) 11768 Foothill Blvd
Service Stations - Public Safety Services Analysis
13) 6760 Carnelian St
14) 7287 Archibald Ave
15) 7996 Archibald Ave
16) 8118 Masi Dr
17) 8166 Foothill Blvd (not active)
18) 8514 Vineyard Ave
12) 6539 Milliken Ave
Page 102
15 18 12 11 16 1 73 14.40
6 18 12 11 16 1 64 12.60
64 65 81 58 72 8 348 68.00
19 65 81 58 72 8 303 59.00
16 21 23 29 23 9 121 22.40
9 21 23 29 23 9 114 21.00
0 8 12 16 16 1 53 10.40
0 8 12 16 16 1 53 10.40
26 37 38 40 34 4 179 35.00
13 37 38 40 34 4 166 32.40
0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0.40
0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0.40
17 27 35 36 30 1 146 29.00
6 27 35 36 30 1 135 26.80
15 39 31 28 16 0 129 25.80
8 39 31 28 16 0 122 24.40
19 15 11 7 11 2 65 12.60
7 15 11 7 11 2 53 10.20
39 27 26 34 48 4 178 34.80
9 27 26 34 48 4 148 28.80
1 33 24 19 18 5 100 19.00
1 33 24 19 18 5 100 19.00
38 41 59 35 71 11 255 48.80
12 41 59 35 71 11 229 43.60
4 6 7 8 15 0 40 8.00
1 6 7 8 15 0 37 7.40
13 21 14 24 12 0 84 16.80
4 21 14 24 12 0 75 15.00
17 6 39 16 44 5 127 24.40
2 0 8 2 7 1 20 3.80
6 60 99 35 35 3 238 47.00
1 11 10 8 9 0 39 7.80
Color Legend:
Calls For Service
Reports Prepared
33) 10477 Alta Loma Dr
34) 11108 Foothill Blvd
32) 9888 Foothill Blvd
23) 12280 Highland Ave
24) 8477 Archibald Ave (not active)
25) 8801 Foothill Blvd
26) 8919 Foothill Blvd
27) 6411 Haven Ave
28) 7243 Haven Ave
29) 8687 Base Line Rd
30) 8075 Monet Ave
31) 9524 Foothill Blvd
19) 8777 Haven Ave
20) 8808 Foothill Blvd
21) 9280 Haven Ave
22) 9315 Base Line Rd
Page 103
Attachment 5 Page 104
1
ORDINANCE NO. _____
AN INTERIM URGENCY ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENACTED
PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65858
ESTABLISHING A MORATORIUM ON THE APPROVAL OF
APPLICATIONS FOR BUILDING PERMITS OR OTHER
ENTITLEMENTS FOR NEW SERVICE STATION USES OR THE
EXPANSION OF EXISTING SERVICE STATION USES IN THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOES HEREBY
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1.Legislative Findings.
A. Subsection F(9) of Section 17.32.020 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal
Code defines a “service station” as a “retail business selling gasoline or other motor
vehicle fuels.” For the purpose of this Interim Urgency Ordinance, a service station shall
be limited to those retail businesses selling motor vehicle fuels derived from liquid fossil
fuels. In this context, a service station is commonly referred to as a gas station.
B. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has classified service stations
and fuel storage locations as uses that may result in a brownfield site. Brownfield sites
are properties, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by
the presence or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant.
C. Common contaminants found at service station sites include gasoline,
diesel, and petroleum oil, volatile organic compounds and solvents, polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbons, and lead. Exposure to the types of contaminants present, or potentially
present, at service stations threatens the public health, safety or welfare of neighboring
communities.
D. There are thirty-two service stations currently in operation in the City of
Rancho Cucamonga. There are an additional two more service stations that are currently
in plan check review for building permit or under construction. Many of the existing
service stations are located near sensitive receptors. The close proximity of service
stations to these areas increases the risk of contaminant exposure to vulnerable
populations. This problem is exacerbated in situations where the service station may
become a brownfield site.
D. A disproportionate amount of the City’s existing service stations are
concentrated in the southwest and central areas of the City. Thirteen service stations are
located in District 2 and eleven are located in District 3. In contrast, Districts 1 and 4 have
only five service stations each. The proliferation of service stations in Districts 2 and 3
inequitably increases health risks for the residents of these districts due to the potential
contaminants present at service stations. As a matter of environmental justice, the City
Page 105
Council must carefully consider how such uses are zoned under the City’s General Plan
and Development Code in order to avoid an undue concentration of service stations in
any one part of the City.
E. Based on data provided by the Sheriff’s Department, the amount of criminal
activity that occurs specifically at service stations necessitates that police services be
routinely deployed to service stations. Over the past five years, the number of calls for
service at service stations has steadily increased. In 2020, a total of 1,059 calls for service
were made at service stations in the City, resulting in approximately 2,455 hours of police
time spent policing and protecting service stations. The development of additional service
stations within the City would result in additional strains on police services to counter the
potential for increased criminal activity.
G. The increased criminal activity associated with service stations threatens
the health, safety and welfare of all residents, but particularly those within the southwest
and central areas of the City, due to the inequitable concentration of service stations in
those areas. The City Council believes the location and proliferation of service stations in
certain areas of the City requires further regulation to ensure that the negative effects of
service stations can be curtailed in order to better protect the public.
H. Altogether, the existing location and concentration of service stations in the
City mean that drivers need only drive approximately five minutes in order to reach most
existing service stations in the City. Applications for additional service stations continue
to be submitted to the City despite the already high concentration of service stations in
the City and declining demand.
I. The declining demand for gasoline is partly demonstrated by the decline in
annual service station revenues in the City. According to revenue estimates reported to
the City by existing service stations, such revenues have declined by over half a million
dollars from 2019 to 2020, echoing global trends, which have seen the decline in service
stations over the past ten years due to a variety of factors, including the proliferation of
electric vehicles, shared mobility solutions, and alternative fuel options.
J. Furthermore, vehicle technology is rapidly evolving such that reliance on
gas is steadily declining. According to a report from the Boston Consulting Group, it is
estimated that by 2030, more than one third of all new vehicles will be fully or partially
electric. Charging for electric vehicles can take place in a variety of locations such as at
home, work and in parking lots. Ride-sharing solutions further reduce demand for
gasoline as car ownership becomes more obsolete. By 2035, shared mobility solutions
such as Uber, Lyft, and Zipcar are expected to account for nearly 20% of on-road
passenger miles. Meanwhile, alternative fuel options such as hydrogen fuel, liquefied
petroleum gas (LPG), compressed natural gas, and biofuels are increasing their share in
the gasoline and diesel markets.
K. The declining demand for gasoline may increase competition amongst the
existing service stations in the City such that closures may occur over time. Due to their
Page 106
propensity to become brownfield sites, service stations require significant investment to
remediate any potential ground contamination prior to redevelopment. Closed sites may
be abandoned and left unused for years and removal of contaminants may present health
risks for neighboring communities and sensitive receptors. Additional closures could
result in increased blight and dangerous conditions throughout the City, thereby
threatening public health, safety and welfare. The City Council wishes to assess the
appropriate concentration and locations of service stations given declining demand.
L. The City has received applications for additional service stations to be
constructed at the corner of 9th Street and Archibald Avenue and at the northeast corner
of Arrow Route and Grove Avenue. An additional service station to be redeveloped and
expanded two blocks north at the corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route and
another to be redeveloped at Foothill Boulevard and Red Hill Country Club Drive have
previously been approved by the Planning Commission, but have not yet completed plan
check and no building permits have been issued. These service station projects would be
located within the southwest part of the City, an area with an already high concentration
of service stations. Based on all of the foregoing impacts associated with the
development of service stations, the City Council therefore finds there is a current and
immediate threat to the public health, safety and welfare that is presented by pending
applications for land use entitlements and building permits to develop new service
stations and expand or remodel existing service stations within the City, and that a
moratorium is necessary.
M. The City Council finds that the time provided by the moratorium will allow
for a comprehensive analysis on how to manage and reduce the impact of additional
service stations in the City, or if additional service stations or the expansion of existing
service stations should be permitted. During the moratorium, the City will be able to
analyze their potential impacts on the public health such as the potential for contaminant
exposure near sensitive receptors and residential areas; impacts on public safety related
to the provision of police services to service stations; and impacts on the public welfare
due to the disproportionate concentration of service stations in certain residential areas
of the City and potential for blight in connection with declining demand for gas. The City
Council finds that these studies will help the Council and the City’s Planning Department
determine how best to prevent impacts to the public health, safety and welfare. The City
Council further finds that the moratorium will allow time to evaluate the General Plan, the
Development Code, and the Zoning map and develop appropriate regulations and/or
appropriate zones for service stations in the City to achieve a reasonable level of
assurance that there will not be serious negative impacts to the overall community and
ensure positive outcomes for the City’s residents, business community, property owners,
and developers.
N. Based on the foregoing, the City Council ultimately finds that if the City fails
to enact this moratorium, new service stations may be allowed to develop within the City
or be redeveloped or expanded within the City that do not reflect the demand for such
services, are incompatible with neighboring residential areas and sensitive receptors, and
exacerbate existing public safety issues at service stations. Therefore, a current and
immediate threat to the public safety, health and welfare exists.
Page 107
SECTION 2.Authority.
Pursuant to Government Code Section 65858, the City Council may adopt, as an
urgency measure, an interim ordinance that prohibits any uses that may be in conflict with
a contemplated zoning proposal that the City Council is considering, studying, or intends
to study within a reasonable period of time.
SECTION 3.Urgency Findings.
The City Council finds and determines that there is an immediate threat to the
public health, safety, or welfare, and that new and expanded service station uses within
the City, under the City’s current regulations, constitutes a threat to the public health,
safety or welfare. As described in Section 1, the staff report accompanying this Interim
Urgency Ordinance, and other evidence in the record, such continued service station
development in the City could threaten the health, safety and welfare of the community
through negative impacts that include, but are not limited to, public safety, contaminant
exposure, and police protection services. To preserve the public health, safety, and
welfare, the City Council finds that it is necessary that this Interim Urgency Ordinance
take effect immediately pursuant to Government Code Sections 65858, 36934, and 36937
to prevent such harm.
SECTION 4.Moratorium Established.
A. Based on the facts and findings set forth in Sections 1 through 3 of this
Interim Urgency Ordinance, and notwithstanding any other ordinance or provision of the
Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, the City Council hereby establishes a moratorium
on the approval of applications for the development of new service station uses or the
expansion of existing service station uses.
B. No application for a building permit or any other entitlement, including a
design review or conditional use permit, authorizing construction of a new service station
use or the expansion of an existing service station use, including the expansion of
accessory uses on the same site, shall be approved during the term of the moratorium
established herein.
C. Nothing contained in this Interim Urgency Ordinance shall preclude the
improvement, renovation, or demolition of an existing service station, provided that such
development otherwise conforms to applicable law, does not result in an increase to the
number of gas pumping facilities, does not add any new accessory uses on site, and does
not require a discretionary entitlement to perform such improvement, renovation, or
demolition.
D. For the purposes of this Interim Urgency Ordinance, the term “service
station” shall have the same meaning prescribed in Subsection F(9) of Section 17.32.020
of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, except that it shall be limited to retail business
selling gasoline or other motor vehicle fuels derived from fossil fuels (e.g., petroleum).
Page 108
SECTION 6.Special Conditional Use Permit.
Notwithstanding any other provision of this Interim Urgency Ordinance, the City of
Rancho Cucamonga may accept, process and approve applications for special
conditional use permits for development or use of property otherwise subject to Section
4 of this Interim Ordinance, if the City Council finds, after receipt of a recommendation
from the Planning Commission, that an owner of property subject to the moratorium
imposed by this Interim Urgency Ordinance will be deprived of all economically viable use
of his or her land unless the property owner is allowed to develop or use the property for
a service station, or that the law of California or of the United States otherwise requires
the City to approve an application for a permit or an entitlement for the development or
use. The special conditional use permit provided by this Section shall be an available
entitlement process and permit for a property owner affected by the moratorium whether
or not a conditional use permit would otherwise be required by the Rancho Cucamonga
Municipal Code. A special conditional use permit submitted pursuant to this Section shall
be processed in accordance with Chapter 17.14 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal
Code, except that the City Council shall serve as the final decision-making body, which
shall make the additional findings required by this Section prior to approving the special
conditional use permit.
SECTION 7.Enforcement.
The provisions of this Interim Urgency Ordinance shall be enforceable pursuant to
the general enforcement provisions in Title 1 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code.
SECTION 8. CEQA Findings.
The City Council hereby finds that it can be seen with certainty that there is no
possibility that the adoption of this Interim Urgency Ordinance may have a significant
effect on the environment, because the Interim Urgency Ordinance will impose a
temporary moratorium on approvals of applications for service station uses in the City in
order to protect the public health, safety and general welfare, and will thereby serve to
avoid potentially significant adverse environmental impacts during the term of the
moratorium. It is therefore not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act review
pursuant to Title 14, Chapter 3, Section 15061(b)(3) of the California Code of Regulations.
SECTION 9. Severability.
If any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of
this Interim Urgency Ordinance or its application to any person or circumstances, is for
any reason held to be invalid or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, such
invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the remaining
sections, subsections, subdivisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses or phrases of this
Interim Urgency Ordinance, or its application to any other person or circumstance. The
City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted each section, subsection,
subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause, phrase hereof, irrespective of the fact that any
Page 109
one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses or
phrases hereof be declared invalid or unenforceable.
SECTION 10. Effective Date; Approval and Extension of Ordinance.
This Interim Urgency Ordinance, being adopted as an urgency measure for the
immediate protection of the public safety, health, and general welfare, containing a
declaration of the facts constituting the urgency, and passed by a minimum four-fifths
(4/5) vote of the City Council, shall take effect immediately upon its adoption and shall
continue in effect for a period of not longer than forty-five (45) days. After notice pursuant
to Government Code Section 65090 and a public hearing, the City Council may extend
the effectiveness of this Urgency Ordinance as provided in Government Code Section
65858.
SECTION 11. Publication.
The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Interim Urgency
Ordinance and shall cause its publication in accordance with applicable law.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 21st day of April, 2021, by the
following vote to wit:
AYES: ( )
NOES: ( )
ABSENT: ( )
ABSTAIN: ( )
L. Dennis Michael, Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________________
Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_________________________________
James L. Markman, City Attorney
Page 110
DATE:June 2, 2021
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Anne McIntosh, AICP, Planning Director
Mike Smith, Principal Planner
SUBJECT:Public Hearing for Consideration of Adoption of Interim Urgency
Ordinance No. 981, Extending for an Additional 10 Months and 15 Days
through April 20, 2022, an Existing Moratorium on the Approval of
Applications for Building Permits or Other Entitlements for New Service
Station Uses or the Expansion of Existing Service Station Uses in the City
of Rancho Cucamonga, Declaring the Urgency thereof and Making a
Determination of Exemption Under the California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA). (INTERIM URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. 981) (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the City Council adopt Interim Ordinance No. 981 entitled "An Interim Urgency
Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Enacted Pursuant to Government
Code Section 65858 Extending for an Additional 10 Months and 15 Days, Through April 20, 2022,
an Existing Moratorium on the Approval of Applications for Building Permits or Other Entitlements
for New Service Station Uses or the Expansion of Existing Service Station Uses in the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, Declaring the Urgency Thereof and Making A Determination of Exemption
Under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)," by four-fifths vote, waive full reading,
and read by title only.
BACKGROUND:
Government Code Section 65858 provides, “Without following the procedures otherwise required
prior to the adoption of a zoning ordinance, the legislative body of a…city…to protect the public
safety, health, and welfare, may adopt as an urgency measure an interim ordinance prohibiting
any uses that may be in conflict with a contemplated General Plan, Specific Plan, or Zoning
proposal that the legislative body, Planning Commission or the Planning Department is
considering or studying or intends to study within a reasonable time. That urgency measure shall
require a four-fifths vote of the legislative body for adoption. The interim ordinance shall be of no
further force and effect 45 days from its date of adoption. After notice pursuant to Section 65090
and public hearing, the legislative body may extend the interim ordinance for 10 months and 15
days and subsequently extend the interim ordinance for one year. Any extension shall also
require a four-fifths vote for adoption. Not more than two extensions may be adopted.”
At the regular City Council meeting of March 17, 2021, the City Council directed the City Manager
to research and compile information about service stations in the City related to the following
topics of concern:
Attachment 2
Page 111
Page 2
7
4
4
The number and location of existing service stations in the City;
Analysis of the land use benefits of service stations to the community;
Analysis of the fiscal benefits of service stations and how this compares to other retail
uses;
Land use impacts of service stations on the surrounding commercial districts and/or
residential neighborhoods;
Costs to the City of providing service at service station locations, particularly calls for public
safety services;
Land use policies that will be included in the General Plan update the City is currently
preparing and which will be available in draft form within the next month; and
Possible performance stations and\/or conditions that could be placed on service station
projects in the future.
On April 21, 2021 at 4:00 PM, the City Council conducted a special study session during which
they received a report prepared by staff (Attachment 1) that described the impacts of service
stations in the City. The City Council then discussed these impacts, the moratorium’s purpose,
and the applicability/timing of the moratorium. At their regular meeting at 7:00 PM on that date,
the City Council subsequently adopted Urgency Ordinance No. 980 (Attachment 2) establishing
an interim urgency ordinance, pursuant to Government Code Section 65858, establishing a
moratorium on the approval of applications for building permits or other entitlements for new
service station uses or the expansion of existing service station uses in the City. The temporary
interim urgency ordinance, if not extended, is set to expire on June 5, 2021.
The moratorium does not apply to:
a. the improvement, renovation, or demolition of an existing service station, provided that the
development otherwise conforms to applicable law, does not result in an increase to the
number of gas/fuel pumps, does not add any new accessory uses on site, and does not
require a discretionary entitlement to perform such improvement, renovation, or
demolition; or
b. an application for a service station that has been deemed Complete or received
all discretionary entitlements as of the moratorium’s effective date, provided that the City
has issued a building permit for construction or redevelopment of the proposed
service station within six months of the moratorium’s effective date (April 21, 2021).
Staff notes that applications submitted during the moratorium may be subject to permanent
development standards that are adopted during the moratorium or after the moratorium expires.
ANALYSIS:
Since the approval of the interim urgency ordinance, staff has developed and has begun
implementing a plan to evaluate all aspects of service station development in the City. Pursuant
to Government Code Section 65858(d), on May 5, 2021, the City Council issued a report
(Attachment 3) describing the measures taken to alleviate the conditions which led to the adoption
of Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 980. These measures include determining the relevant topics
related to service station development that need to be evaluated, the process and timeline for
conducting these analyses, and potential solutions to address issues that have been identified
with service station development.
Page 112
Page 3
7
4
4
The City’s Planning and Engineering Services Departments and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire
Protection District (RCFPD) are the primary departments tasked with the review of applications
for proposed new development/redevelopment, including service station development, in the City.
Staff from these departments, in coordination with other departments such as the City’s Finance
Department and the San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department as necessary, have
undertaken, or will undertake, the following specific activities during the moratorium:
a) The City is currently in the process of updating the General Plan, the Zoning Map, and the
Development Code to incorporate appropriate land use regulations and technical/design
standards for all types of development within the City. As a part of this effort, the City will be
identifying updates that will specifically address the development and operation of service
stations. The public draft of the General Plan will be released for public review in the second
quarter of 2021. The associated Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is currently being
prepared and will be circulated for public review in mid-2021.
In considering land use and zoning provisions for service stations, staff will be evaluating
whether the City’s residents and visitors are adequately served by the 32 existing service
stations in the City. This will assist in determining whether there is a need for more service
stations. Or, if the needs of the City are being met, that the City has reached a saturation
point with service stations. As the City becomes more “built-out” there is less vacant land
available for development that will fulfill the City Council’s and community’s vision for ‘A World
Class Community.’ Thus, the answers to this evaluation also will be critical in shaping the
next phase of development, and the pattern of that development, in the City for decades into
the future. This is especially important as staff periodically receives inquiries about service
station development. Knowing these answers will assist staff in comprehensively responding
to these inquiries.
Most of the remaining vacant land in the City is surrounded by existing development that are
considered “sensitive” uses such as residential neighborhoods, schools, and parks. As a
result, it has become more important and relevant to consider surrounding uses and
context/compatibility when reviewing proposals for service stations. Their location near
sensitive uses increases the risk of contaminant exposure to vulnerable populations. This
problem is magnified in instances where a service station may become obsolete and become
a “brownfield” site, i.e. a property of which the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse may be
complicated by the presence or potential presence of a hazardous substance(s), pollutant(s),
or contaminant(s). Exposure to the types of contaminants that are present, or are potentially
present, at service stations threatens the public health, safety or welfare of neighboring
sensitive uses. This outcome is not accounted for in the City’s current land use regulations
and, as a result, they will be updated.
A disproportionate amount of the City’s existing service stations uses are concentrated in the
southwest and central areas of the City. The proliferation of service stations in these areas
of the City inequitably increases health risks for the residents of in these locations due to the
potential contaminants present at service stations. Under consideration will be where service
station uses are designated as a permitted or conditionally permitted use in the City’s General
Plan and Zoning Map, and how such uses are regulated in the Development Code. The
purpose of this will be to minimize the undue concentration of service stations in any one area
of the City. The updates to these documents will also include an analysis of the land use
compatibility of service stations with sensitive uses. Further analysis will be conducted on the
contribution of service stations to the fiscal vitality of the City and demand for public safety
services generated by service stations. Both topics are discussed further below:
Page 113
Page 4
7
4
4
b) Staff has begun researching the fiscal impacts of existing service stations in the City. Staff
will be evaluating, for example, the sales tax revenue of each of the existing and potential
service stations in the City and comparing their fiscal performance with other commercial uses
that could potentially be developed on the property. Based on staff’s preliminary analysis, the
collective sales tax revenue of the existing service stations in the City is generally trending
downward. Staff will also be researching, for example, the tax revenue generated by service
stations in other cities to see how they compare to the revenue generated in the City. Note
that trends in changing technology may further erode and depress sales tax revenue. As part
of staff’s efforts, there will be an evaluation of service stations’ fiscal performance in this
context and whether such uses could become obsolete. Staff will also be evaluating the fiscal
performance of service stations relative to the demand on public safety services (and the cost
to provide them).
c) Staff has begun researching the demand for public safety services generated by existing
service stations in the City. Based on staff’s preliminary analysis using data provided by the
San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department, total calls for service of any kind at service
stations in the City have generally increased since 2016. There were 637 calls for service in
2016 compared to 1,059 calls for service in 2020. Data for 2021 is incomplete but thus far
there has been 135 calls for service. Over that 5-year period, this equates to an average of
about 924 calls for service per year. Similarly, the time spent by deputies on these
calls during the same period has increased from about 1,101 hours to about 2,455 hours per
year. The average amount of time spent on location (all services stations combined) is about
1,870 hours per year.
The number of calls for service and the time spent at service stations cause public safety
resources to be used in a likely inefficient and potentially unsustainable
manner. Furthermore, service stations draw away an important and critical service from other
areas of the City. Including 2021 to date, there has been a combined total of 4,754 calls for
service for all service stations. The total calls for service are not equal among the various
service stations. It is not yet clear why this disparity exists. As part of the evaluation of the
demand for public safety services, staff will reach-out to representatives from the Sheriff’s
Department to determine what they believe are the underlying causes for the increase in calls
and time spent on location. Staff will also be researching the operating characteristics of all
32 service stations in the City. Staff believes that the disparity in total calls for service may
be due to service stations having different operating characteristics. For example, if a service
station sells alcohol; is open 24 hours; has accessory uses such as a car wash or a restaurant;
or provides services such as vehicle repair, then staff will utilize that information to determine
the relationship with demands on public safety resources. To assist in this evaluation, staff
will verify the operational characteristics of each of the service stations in the City and
compare that information with the calls for service to determine if there is any relationship
between them. If necessary, staff will develop new regulations and standards that will allow
public safety resources to be used more efficiently and sustainably;
d) Staff has begun researching how conventional service stations may be affected by:
advancements in electric vehicle (EV) technology such as increases in their range due to more
efficient batteries; the adoption of EVs as a practical alternative to fossil fuel powered vehicles
due to the introduction of chargers that bring the batteries of EVs to a full charge faster or
batteries that have the capacity to power heavier vehicles such as trucks; the availability of a
variety different mobility options, or the preference for them, such as ridesharing services and
mass transit; and new government regulations restricting or prohibiting the sale of vehicles
Page 114
Page 5
7
4
4
with conventional combustion engines at a specified time in the future;
e) After the above-noted research is completed, staff will prepare proposed amendments to the
Development Code, and other relevant documents as necessary, related to technical/design
standards and requirements for service stations within the City for consideration by the
Planning Commission and City Council by June 30, 2022. As part of this process, staff will
be developing new regulations such as those that would, for example, regulate physical
development requirements such as the number of service stations at street intersections and
the minimum distance, or separation, between services stations; regulate operating conditions
such as the hours that service stations are open and whether they sell alcohol; and determine
what accessory uses or services could (or if the City prefers, should) be included with service
stations such as the sale of fresh food.
As part of this effort, staff will be reviewing the municipal/development codes of neighboring
jurisdictions to determine how they regulate service stations and the technical/design
standards that those communities apply to them. Similarly, staff will be researching how older,
built-out communities manage service stations within their jurisdictions. When possible, staff
will contact their counterparts at these other jurisdictions to discuss their experiences with
service stations. This will also include a verification of the number of service stations in these
jurisdictions which, in turn, will be used determine whether the number of service stations in
the City is sufficient to serve the community’s needs.
f) Next steps - timeline: The next steps and timeline in the process are as follows:
1. Issue identification and discovery - identify problems and validate/calibrate with other City
Departments and (when necessary) external stakeholders – current activity and continuing
into 3rd and 4th quarter of 2021;
2. Explore options – share initial list of solutions with stakeholders, understand efficacy of
the options, and determine support for solutions – current activity and continuing into 3rd
and 4th quarter of 2021;
3. Prepare preferred solutions – propose changes to the Development Code (and any other
solutions), and understand efficacy of the options, and determine support for solutions –
3rd and 4th quarter of 2021;
4. Planning Commission – recommendations on proposed amendments to the Development
Code – 1st or 2nd quarter of 2022;
5. City Council - adoption of permanent development standards for service stations – 2nd
quarter 2022.
The existing moratorium adopted pursuant to Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 980 is scheduled
to expire on June 5, 2021. The proposed Interim Urgency Ordinance attached to this report as
Attachment 4 would extend the moratorium for an additional 10 months and 15 days, through
April 20, 2022. If the City is unable to complete the steps outlined above before April 20, 2022,
the City Council may, but does not have to, extend the moratorium on new or expanded service
stations for up to an additional year.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None with this action.
Page 115
Page 6
7
4
4
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:
Enacting an interim moratorium on service station development in the City will further the City
Council's goals for balanced and responsible long term land use planning, fiscally efficient public
safety services, and the attainment of economic development diversity. Specifically, it will
facilitate the City’s core values of providing and nurturing a high quality of life; promoting and
enhancing a safe and healthy community; and intentionally embracing and anticipating the future.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 – City Council Staff Report (April 21, 2021) for Interim Urgency Ordinance
Attachment 2 – Ordinance No. 980
Attachment 3 – City Council 10-Day Staff Report (May 5, 2021)
Attachment 4 – Ordinance No. 981
Page 116
Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 980 - Page 1 of 6
ORDINANCE NO. 980
AN INTERIM URGENCY ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ENACTED
PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65858
ESTABLISHING A MORATORIUM ON THE APPROVAL OF
APPLICATIONS FOR BUILDING PERMITS OR OTHER
ENTITLEMENTS FOR NEW SERVICE STATION USES OR THE
EXPANSION OF EXISTING SERVICE STATION USES IN THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOES HEREBY
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Legislative Findings.
A.Subsection F(9) of Section 17.32.020 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code
defines a “service station” as a “retail business selling gasoline or other motor vehicle fuels.” For
the purpose of this Interim Urgency Ordinance, a service station shall be limited to those retail
businesses selling motor vehicle fuels derived from liquid fossil fuels. In this context, a service
station is commonly referred to as a gas station.
B.The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has classified service stations and
fuel storage locations as uses that may result in a brownfield site. Brownfield sites are properties,
the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence or potential
presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant.
C.Common contaminants found at service station sites include gasoline, diesel, and
petroleum oil, volatile organic compounds and solvents, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, and
lead. Exposure to the types of contaminants present, or potentially present, at service stations
threatens the public health, safety or welfare of neighboring communities.
D.There are thirty-two service stations currently in operation in the City of Rancho
Cucamonga. There are an additional two more service stations that are currently in plan check
review for building permit or under construction. Many of the existing service stations are located
near sensitive receptors. The close proximity of service stations to these areas increases the risk
of contaminant exposure to vulnerable populations. This problem is exacerbated in situations
where the service station may become a brownfield site.
D.A disproportionate amount of the City’s existing service stations are concentrated
in the southwest and central areas of the City. Thirteen service stations are located in District 2
and eleven are located in District 3. In contrast, Districts 1 and 4 have only five service stations
each. The proliferation of service stations in Districts 2 and 3 inequitably increases health risks
for the residents of these districts due to the potential contaminants present at service stations.
As a matter of environmental justice, the City Council must carefully consider how such uses are
zoned under the City’s General Plan and Development Code in order to avoid an undue
concentration of service stations in any one part of the City.
E.Based on data provided by the Sheriff’s Department, the amount of criminal activity
that occurs specifically at service stations necessitates that police services be routinely deployed
to service stations. Over the past five years, the number of calls for service at service stations has
Attachment 3Page117
Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 980 - Page 2 of 6
steadily increased. In 2020, a total of 1,059 calls for service were made at service stations in the
City, resulting in approximately 2,455 hours of police time spent policing and protecting service
stations. The development of additional service stations within the City would result in additional
strains on police services to counter the potential for increased criminal activity.
G.The increased criminal activity associated with service stations threatens the
health, safety and welfare of all residents, but particularly those within the southwest and central
areas of the City, due to the inequitable concentration of service stations in those areas. The City
Council believes the location and proliferation of service stations in certain areas of the City
requires further regulation to ensure that the negative effects of service stations can be curtailed
in order to better protect the public.
H.Altogether, the existing location and concentration of service stations in the City
mean that drivers need only drive approximately five minutes in order to reach most existing
service stations in the City. Applications for additional service stations continue to be submitted
to the City despite the already high concentration of service stations in the City and declining
demand.
I.The declining demand for gasoline is partly demonstrated by the decline in annual
service station revenues in the City. According to revenue estimates reported to the City by
existing service stations, such revenues have declined by over half a million dollars from 2019 to
2020, echoing global trends, which have seen the decline in service stations over the past ten
years due to a variety of factors, including the proliferation of electric vehicles, shared mobility
solutions, and alternative fuel options.
J.Furthermore, vehicle technology is rapidly evolving such that reliance on gas is
steadily declining. According to a report from the Boston Consulting Group, it is estimated that by
2030, more than one third of all new vehicles will be fully or partially electric. Charging for electric
vehicles can take place in a variety of locations such as at home, work and in parking lots. Ride-
sharing solutions further reduce demand for gasoline as car ownership becomes more obsolete.
By 2035, shared mobility solutions such as Uber, Lyft, and Zipcar are expected to account for
nearly 20% of on-road passenger miles. Meanwhile, alternative fuel options such as hydrogen
fuel, liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), compressed natural gas, and biofuels are increasing their
share in the gasoline and diesel markets.
K.The declining demand for gasoline may increase competition amongst the existing
service stations in the City such that closures may occur over time. Due to their propensity to
become brownfield sites, service stations require significant investment to remediate any potential
ground contamination prior to redevelopment. Closed sites may be abandoned and left unused
for years and removal of contaminants may present health risks for neighboring communities and
sensitive receptors. Additional closures could result in increased blight and dangerous conditions
throughout the City, thereby threatening public health, safety and welfare. The City Council wishes
to assess the appropriate concentration and locations of service stations given declining demand.
L.The City has received applications for additional service stations to be constructed
at the corner of 9th Street and Archibald Avenue and at the northeast corner of Arrow Route and
Grove Avenue. An additional service station to be redeveloped and expanded two blocks north at
the corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route and another to be redeveloped at Foothill
Boulevard and Red Hill Country Club Drive have previously been approved by the Planning
Commission, but have not yet completed plan check and no building permits have been issued.
These service station projects would be located within the southwest part of the City, an area with
Page 118
Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 980 - Page 3 of 6
an already high concentration of service stations. Based on all of the foregoing impacts
associated with the development of service stations, the City Council therefore finds there is a
current and immediate threat to the public health, safety and welfare that is presented by pending
applications for land use entitlements and building permits to develop new service stations and
expand or remodel existing service stations within the City, and that a moratorium is necessary.
M.The City Council finds that the time provided by the moratorium will allow for a
comprehensive analysis on how to manage and reduce the impact of additional service stations
in the City, or if additional service stations or the expansion of existing service stations should be
permitted. During the moratorium, the City will be able to analyze their potential impacts on the
public health such as the potential for contaminant exposure near sensitive receptors and
residential areas; impacts on public safety related to the provision of police services to service
stations; and impacts on the public welfare due to the disproportionate concentration of service
stations in certain residential areas of the City and potential for blight in connection with declining
demand for gas. The City Council finds that these studies will help the Council and the City’s
Planning Department determine how best to prevent impacts to the public health, safety and
welfare. The City Council further finds that the moratorium will allow time to evaluate the General
Plan, the Development Code, and the Zoning map and develop appropriate regulations and/or
appropriate zones for service stations in the City to achieve a reasonable level of assurance that
there will not be serious negative impacts to the overall community and ensure positive outcomes
for the City’s residents, business community, property owners, and developers.
N.Based on the foregoing, the City Council ultimately finds that if the City fails to
enact this moratorium, new service stations may be allowed to develop within the City or be
redeveloped or expanded within the City that do not reflect the demand for such services, are
incompatible with neighboring residential areas and sensitive receptors, and exacerbate existing
public safety issues at service stations. Therefore, a current and immediate threat to the public
safety, health and welfare exists.
SECTION 2. Authority.
Pursuant to Government Code Section 65858, the City Council may adopt, as an urgency
measure, an interim ordinance that prohibits any uses that may be in conflict with a contemplated
zoning proposal that the City Council is considering, studying, or intends to study within a
reasonable period of time.
SECTION 3. Urgency Findings.
The City Council finds and determines that there is an immediate threat to the public
health, safety, or welfare, and that new and expanded service station uses within the City, under
the City’s current regulations, constitutes a threat to the public health, safety or welfare. As
described in Section 1, the staff report accompanying this Interim Urgency Ordinance, and other
evidence in the record, such continued service station development in the City could threaten the
health, safety and welfare of the community through negative impacts that include, but are not
limited to, public safety, contaminant exposure, and police protection services. To preserve the
public health, safety, and welfare, the City Council finds that it is necessary that this Interim
Urgency Ordinance take effect immediately pursuant to Government Code Sections 65858,
36934, and 36937 to prevent such harm.
SECTION 4. Moratorium Established.
Page 119
Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 980 - Page 4 of 6
A.Based on the facts and findings set forth in Sections 1 through 3 of this Interim
Urgency Ordinance, and notwithstanding any other ordinance or provision of the Rancho
Cucamonga Municipal Code, the City Council hereby establishes a moratorium on the approval
of applications for the development of new service station uses or the expansion of existing
service station uses.
B.No application for a building permit or any other entitlement, including a design
review or conditional use permit, authorizing construction of a new service station use or the
expansion of an existing service station use, including the expansion of accessory uses on the
same site, shall be approved during the term of the moratorium established herein.
C. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the moratorium established by this Interim Urgency
Ordinance shall not apply to the following:
(1) The improvement, renovation, or demolition of an existing service station, provided that such
development otherwise conforms to applicable law, does not result in an increase to the number
of gas pumping facilities, does not add any new accessory uses on site, and does not require a
discretionary entitlement to perform such improvement, renovation, or demolition; or
(2) An application for a service station that has been deemed complete or received all
discretionary entitlements as of the moratorium’s effective date, provided that the City has issued
a building permit for construction or redevelopment of the proposed service station within six
months of the moratorium’s effective date. The moratorium shall thereafter apply to these
applications if a building permit has not been issued within that six-month period.
D.For the purposes of this Interim Urgency Ordinance, the term “service station” shall
have the same meaning prescribed in Subsection F(9) of Section 17.32.020 of the Rancho
Cucamonga Municipal Code, except that it shall be limited to retail business selling gasoline or
other motor vehicle fuels derived from fossil fuels (e.g., petroleum).
SECTION 6. Special Conditional Use Permit.
Notwithstanding any other provision of this Interim Urgency Ordinance, the City of Rancho
Cucamonga may accept, process and approve applications for special conditional use permits for
development or use of property otherwise subject to Section 4 of this Interim Ordinance, if the
City Council finds, after receipt of a recommendation from the Planning Commission, that an
owner of property subject to the moratorium imposed by this Interim Urgency Ordinance will be
deprived of all economically viable use of his or her land unless the property owner is allowed to
develop or use the property for a service station, or that the law of California or of the United
States otherwise requires the City to approve an application for a permit or an entitlement for the
development or use. The special conditional use permit provided by this Section shall be an
available entitlement process and permit for a property owner affected by the moratorium whether
or not a conditional use permit would otherwise be required by the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal
Code. A special conditional use permit submitted pursuant to this Section shall be processed in
accordance with Chapter 17.14 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, except that the City
Council shall serve as the final decision-making body, which shall make the additional findings
required by this Section prior to approving the special conditional use permit.
Page 120
Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 980 - Page 5 of 6
SECTION 7. Enforcement.
The provisions of this Interim Urgency Ordinance shall be enforceable pursuant to the
general enforcement provisions in Title 1 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code.
SECTION 8. CEQA Findings.
The City Council hereby finds that it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility
that the adoption of this Interim Urgency Ordinance may have a significant effect on the
environment, because the Interim Urgency Ordinance will impose a temporary moratorium on
approvals of applications for service station uses in the City in order to protect the public health,
safety and general welfare, and will thereby serve to avoid potentially significant adverse
environmental impacts during the term of the moratorium. It is therefore not subject to the
California Environmental Quality Act review pursuant to Title 14, Chapter 3, Section 15061(b)(3)
of the California Code of Regulations.
SECTION 9. Severability.
If any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this
Interim Urgency Ordinance or its application to any person or circumstances, is for any reason
held to be invalid or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or
unenforceability shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the remaining sections,
subsections, subdivisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses or phrases of this Interim Urgency
Ordinance, or its application to any other person or circumstance. The City Council hereby
declares that it would have adopted each section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence,
clause, phrase hereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections,
subdivisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses or phrases hereof be declared invalid or
unenforceable.
SECTION 10. Effective Date; Approval and Extension of Ordinance.
This Interim Urgency Ordinance, being adopted as an urgency measure for the immediate
protection of the public safety, health, and general welfare, containing a declaration of the facts
constituting the urgency, and passed by a minimum four-fifths (4/5) vote of the City Council, shall
take effect immediately upon its adoption and shall continue in effect for a period of not longer
than forty-five (45) days. After notice pursuant to Government Code Section 65090 and a public
hearing, the City Council may extend the effectiveness of this Urgency Ordinance as provided in
Government Code Section 65858.
SECTION 11. Publication.
The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Interim Urgency Ordinance
and shall cause its publication in accordance with applicable law.
Page 121
Page 122
Page 1
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the City Council issue the attached report in conformance with California
Government Code Section 65858 on the measures taken by the City to alleviate the need for
Interim Ordinance No. 980.
BACKGROUND:
At the regular City Council meeting of March 17, 2021, the City Council directed the City Manager
to research and compile information about service stations in the City related to the following
topics of concern:
The number and location of existing service stations in the city;
Analysis of the land use benefits of service stations to the community;
Analysis of the fiscal benefits of service stations and how this compares to other retail
uses;
Land use impacts of service stations on the surrounding commercial districts and/or
residential neighborhoods;
Costs to the City of providing service at service station locations, particularly calls for public
safety services;
Land use policies that will be included in the General Plan update the City is currently
preparing and which will be available in draft form within the next month; and
Possible performance stations and\/or conditions that could be placed on service station
projects in the future.
On April 21, 2021 at 4:00 PM, the City Council conducted a special study session during which
they received a report prepared by staff that described the impacts of service stations in the City.
The City Council then discussed these impacts, the moratorium’s purpose, and the
applicability/timing of the moratorium. At their regular meeting at 7:00 PM on that date, the City
Council subsequently adopted Urgency Ordinance No. 980 (Attachment 2) establishing an interim
urgency zoning Ordinance, pursuant to Government Code Section 65858, establishing a
moratorium on the approval of applications for building permits or other entitlements for new
service station uses or the expansion of existing service station uses in the City. The temporary
interim urgency ordinance, if not extended, is set to expire on June 5, 2021.
DATE:May 5, 2021
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Anne McIntosh, AICP, Planning Director
Mike Smith, Principal Planner
SUBJECT:Report in Conformance with California Government Code Section 65858(D) on
Measures Taken to Alleviate the Need for Interim Ordinance No. 980. (CITY)
Attachment 4
Page 123
Page 2
7
2
4
ANALYSIS:
Section 65858(d) of the California Government Code provides that, “Ten days prior to the
expiration of that interim ordinance or any extension, the legislative body shall issue a written
report describing the measures taken to alleviate the condition which led to the adoption of the
ordinance.” The 10-day report does not modify nor extend the City’s existing moratorium related
to service stations. Rather, issuance of the 10-day report satisfies a statutory step in the process
to permit the City Council to consider that potential extension at its next regular meeting on June
2, 2021.
The following specific activities are currently being undertaken to alleviate the conditions which
led to the adoption of Interim Ordinance 980.
The City is currently in the process of updating the General Plan, the Zoning Map, and the
Development Code to incorporate appropriate land use regulations and technical/design
standards for all types of development within the City. As a part of this effort, the City has
also begun the process of identifying updates that will specifically address the
development and operation of service stations.
In considering land use and zoning provisions for service stations, staff will be evaluating whether
the City’s residents and visitors are adequately served by the 32 existing service stations in the
City. This will assist in determining whether there is a need for more service stations. Or, if the
needs of the City are being met, that the City has reached a saturation point with service stations.
As the City becomes more “built-out” there is less vacant land available for development that will
fulfill the City Council’s and community’s vision for ‘A World Class Community.’ Thus, the answers
to this evaluation also will be critical in shaping the next phase of development, and the pattern
of that development, in the City for decades into the future.
Most of the remaining vacant land in the City is surrounded by existing development that are
considered “sensitive” uses such as residential neighborhoods, schools, and parks. As a result,
it has become more important and relevant to consider surrounding uses and context/compatibility
when reviewing proposals for service stations. Their location near sensitive uses increases the
risk of contaminant exposure to vulnerable populations. This problem is magnified in instances
where a service station may become obsolete and become a “brownfield” site, i.e. a property of
which the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse may be complicated by the presence or potential
presence of a hazardous substance(s), pollutant(s), or contaminant(s). Exposure to the types of
contaminants that are present, or are potentially present, at service stations threatens the public
health, safety or welfare of neighboring sensitive uses. This outcome is not accounted for in the
City’s current land use regulations and, as a result, they will be updated.
A disproportionate amount of the City’s existing service stations uses are concentrated in the
southwest and central areas of the City. The proliferation of service stations in these areas of the
City inequitably increases health risks for the residents of in these locations due to the potential
contaminants present at service stations. Under consideration will be where service station
uses are designated as a permitted or conditionally permitted use in the City’s General Plan and
Zoning Map, and how such uses are regulated in the Development Code. The purpose of this
will be minimize the undue concentration of service stations in any one area of the City. The
updates to these documents also will include an analysis of the land use compatibility of service
stations with sensitive uses. Further analysis will be conducted on the contribution of service
Page 124
Page 3
7
2
4
stations to the fiscal vitality of the City and demand for public safety services generated by service
stations. These topics are both further discussed below;
Staff has begun researching the fiscal impacts of existing service stations in the City. Staff
will be evaluating, for example, the sales tax revenue of each of the existing and potential
service stations in the City and comparing their fiscal performance with other commercial
uses that could potentially be developed on the property. Based on staff’s preliminary
analysis, the collective sales tax revenue of the existing service stations in the City has
been generally trending downward. Staff also will be researching, for example, the tax
revenue generated by service stations in other cities to see how they compare the revenue
generated in the City. Note that trends in changing technology may further erode and
depress sales tax revenue. As part of staff’s efforts, there will be an evaluation of service
stations fiscal performance in this context and whether such uses could become obsolete.
Staff will also be evaluating the fiscal performance of service stations relative to the
demand on public safety services (and the cost to provide them);
Staff has begun researching the demand for public safety services generated by existing
service stations in the City. Based on staff’s preliminary analysis using data provided by
the San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department, total calls for service of any kind at
service stations in the City have generally increased since 2016. There were 637 calls for
service in 2016 compared to 1,059 calls for service in 2020. Data for 2021 is incomplete
but thus far there has been 135 calls for service. Over that 5-year period, this equates
to an average of about 924 calls for service. Similarly, the time spent by deputies on these
calls during the same period has increased from about 1,101 hours to about 2,455 hours.
The average amount of time spent on location is about 1,870 hours.
The number of calls for service and the time spent at service stations cause public safety
resources to be used in a likely inefficient and potentially unsustainable manner. Furthermore,
service stations draw away an important and critical service from other areas of the
City. Including 2021 to date, there has been a combined total of 4,754 calls for service for
all service stations. The total calls for service are not equal among the various service stations.
It is not yet clear why this disparity exists. As part of the evaluation of the demand for public
safety services, staff will reach-out to representatives from the Sheriff’s Department to determine
what they believe are the underlying causes for the increase in calls and time spent on location.
Staff will also be researching the operating characteristics of all 32 service stations in the City.
Staff believes that the disparity in total calls for service may be due to service stations having
different operating characteristics. For example, if a service station sells alcohol; is open 24
hours; has accessory uses such as a car wash or a restaurant; or provides services such as
vehicle repair, then staff will utilize that information to determine the relationship with demands on
public safety resources. If necessary, staff will develop new regulations and standards that will
allow public safety resources to be used more efficiently and sustainably;
Staff has begun researching how conventional service stations may be affected by:
advancements in electric vehicle (EV) technology such as increases in their range due to
more efficient batteries; the adoption of EVs as a practical alternative to fossil fuel powered
vehicles due to the introduction of chargers that bring the batteries of EVs to a full charge
faster or batteries that have the capacity to power heavier vehicles such as trucks; the
availability of a variety different mobility options, or the preference for them, such as
ridesharing services and mass transit; and new government regulations restricting or
prohibiting the sale of vehicles with conventional combustion engines at a specified time
in the future;
Page 125
Page 4
7
2
4
Staff is drafting amendments to the Development Code, and other relevant documents as
necessary, related to technical/design standards and requirements for service stations
within the City for consideration by the Planning Commission and City Council by June 30,
2022. As part of this process, staff will be developing new regulations such as those that
would, for example, regulate physical requirements such as the number of service stations
at street intersections and the minimum distance, or separation, between services
stations; regulate operating conditions such as the hours that service stations are open
and whether they sell alcohol; and determine what accessory uses or services could (or if
the City prefers, should) be included with service stations such as the sale of fresh food.
As part of this effort, staff will be reviewing the municipal/development codes of neighboring
jurisdictions to determine how they regulate service stations and the technical/design standards
that those communities apply to them. Similarly, staff will be researching how older, built-out
communities manage service stations within their jurisdictions. When possible, staff will contact
their counterparts at these other jurisdictions to discuss their experiences with service stations.
The above reflect the actions taken since the adoption of Interim Ordinance No. 980. The City
Council must issue the attached report that describes these actions in order to extend the interim
urgency ordinance currently in effect. An opportunity for full public comment on the extension of
Interim Ordinance No. 980 will be provided at the City Council's Public Hearing to be held on June
2, 2021 prior to the City Council’s consideration of an ordinance to extend Interim Ordinance No.
980.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 – 10-Day Report
Attachment 2 – Ordinance No. 980
Page 126
REPORT ON THE MEASURES TAKEN TO ALLEVIATE
THE CONDITIONS WHICH LED THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
TO ENACT INTERIM URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. 980 ON APRIL 21, 2021, ESTABLISHING
A MORATORIUM ON THE APPROVAL OF BUILDING PERMITS OR OTHER
ENTITLEMENTS FOR NEW SERVICE STATION USES OR THE EXPANSION OF EXISTING
SERVICE STATION USES IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ISSUED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ON MAY 5,
2021 PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65858(d)
On April 5, 2021, pursuant to Government Code Section 65858, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council enacted Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 980 to impose a moratorium on the approval of building permits or other entitlements for new service station uses or the expansion of existing service station uses. Absent any additional action by the City Council, the Interim Urgency Ordinance will expire after 45 days (June 5, 2021). However, additional time is necessary to thoroughly research and evaluate a permanent, non-urgency ordinance, updates/amendments to General Plan policies and goals, the Zoning Map, and the Development Code establishing land use regulations and technical/design standards on service station development in the City. City staff has therefore scheduled and will notice a public hearing for June 2, 2021, to extend the Interim Urgency Ordinance.
Measures taken to alleviate the conditions which led to the adoption of Interim Urgency
Ordinance No. 980:
•The City is currently in the process of updating the General Plan, the Zoning Map, and theDevelopment Code to incorporate appropriate land use regulations and technical/designstandards for all types of development within the City. As a part of this effort, the City has alsobegun the process of identifying updates that will specifically address the development andoperation of service stations.
In considering land use and zoning provisions for service stations, staff will be evaluating whether the City’s residents and visitors are adequately served by the 32 existing service stations in the City. This will assist in determining whether there is a need for more service stations. Or, if the needs of the City are being met, that the City has reached a saturation point with service stations. As the City becomes more “built-out” there is less vacant land available for development that will fulfill the City Council’s and community’s vision for ‘A World Class Community.’ Thus, the answers to this evaluation also will be critical in shaping the next phase of development, and the pattern of that development, in the City for decades into the future.
Most of the remaining vacant land in the City is surrounded by existing development that are considered “sensitive” uses such as residential neighborhoods, schools, and parks. As a result, it has become more important and relevant to consider surrounding uses and context/compatibility when reviewing proposals for service stations. Their location near sensitive uses increases the risk of contaminant exposure to vulnerable populations. This problem is magnified in instances where a service station may become obsolete and become a “brownfield” site, i.e. a property of which the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of a hazardous substance(s), pollutant(s), or contaminant(s). Exposure to the types of contaminants that are present, or are potentially present, at service stations threatens the public health, safety or welfare of neighboring sensitive uses. This outcome is not accounted for in the City’s current land use regulations and, as a result, they will be updated.
Attachment 1 Page 127
A disproportionate amount of the City’s existing service stations uses are concentrated in the southwest and central areas of the City. The proliferation of service stations in these areas of the City inequitably increases health risks for the residents of in these locations due to the potential contaminants present at service stations. Under consideration will be where service station uses are designated as a permitted or conditionally permitted use in the City’s General Plan and Zoning Map, and how such uses are regulated in the Development Code. The purpose of this will be minimize the undue concentration of service stations in any one area of the City. The updates to these documents also will include an analysis of the land use compatibility of service stations with sensitive uses. Further analysis will be conducted on the contribution of service stations to the fiscal vitality of the City and demand for public safety services generated by service stations. These topics are both further discussed below;
• Staff has begun researching the fiscal impacts of existing service stations in the City. Staff will be evaluating, for example, the sales tax revenue of each of the existing and potential service stations in the City and comparing their fiscal performance with other commercial uses that could potentially be developed on the property. Based on staff’s preliminary analysis, the collective sales tax revenue of the existing service stations in the City has been generally trending downward. Staff also will be researching, for example, the tax revenue generated by service stations in other cities to see how they compare the revenue generated in the City. Note that trends in changing technology may further erode and depress sales tax revenue. As part of staff’s efforts, there will be an evaluation of service stations fiscal performance in this context and whether such uses could become obsolete. Staff will also be evaluating the fiscal performance of service stations relative to the demand on public safety services (and the cost to provide them);
• Staff has begun researching the demand for public safety services generated by existing service stations in the City. Based on staff’s preliminary analysis using data provided by the San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department, total calls for service of any kind at service stations in the City have generally increased since 2016. There were 637 calls for service in 2016 compared to 1,059 calls for service in 2020. Data for 2021 is incomplete but thus far there has been 135 calls for service. Over that 5-year period, this equates to an average of about 924 calls for service. Similarly, the time spent by deputies on these calls during the same period has increased from about 1,101 hours to about 2,455 hours. The average amount of time spent on location is about 1,870 hours. The number of calls for service and the time spent at service stations cause public safety resources to be used in a likely inefficient and potentially unsustainable manner. Furthermore, service stations draw away an important and critical service from other areas of the City. Including 2021 to date, there has been a combined total of 4,754 calls for service for all service stations. The total calls for service are not equal among the various service stations. It is not yet clear why this disparity exists. As part of the evaluation of the demand for public safety services, staff will reach-out to representatives from the Sheriff’s Department to determine what they believe are the underlying causes for the increase in calls and time spent on location. Staff will also be researching the operating characteristics of all 32 service stations in the City. Staff believes that the disparity in total calls for service may be due to service stations having different operating characteristics. For example, if a service station sells alcohol; is open 24 hours; has accessory uses such as a car wash or a restaurant; or provides services such as vehicle repair, then staff will utilize that information to determine the relationship with demands on public safety resources. If necessary, staff will develop new regulations and standards that will allow public safety resources to be used more efficiently and sustainably;
Page 128
• Staff has begun researching how conventional service stations may be affected by: advancements in electric vehicle (EV) technology such as increases in their range due to more efficient batteries; the adoption of EVs as a practical alternative to fossil fuel powered vehicles due to the introduction of chargers that bring the batteries of EVs to a full charge faster or batteries that have the capacity to power heavier vehicles such as trucks; the availability of a variety different mobility options, or the preference for them, such as ridesharing services and mass transit; and new government regulations restricting or prohibiting the sale of vehicles with conventional combustion engines at a specified time in the future;
• Staff is drafting amendments to the Development Code, and other relevant documents as necessary, related to technical/design standards and requirements for service stations within the City for consideration by the Planning Commission and City Council by June 30, 2022. As part of this process, staff will be developing new regulations such as those that would, for example, regulate physical requirements such as the number of service stations at street intersections and the minimum distance, or separation, between services stations; regulate operating conditions such as the hours that service stations are open and whether they sell alcohol; and determine what accessory uses or services could (or if the City prefers, should) be included with service stations such as the sale of fresh food. As part of this effort, staff will be reviewing the municipal/development codes of neighboring jurisdictions to determine how they regulate service stations and the technical/design standards that those communities apply to them. Similarly, staff will be researching how older, built-out communities manage service stations within their jurisdictions. When possible, staff will contact their counterparts at these other jurisdictions to discuss their experiences with service stations.
Page 129
INTERIM URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. 981
AN INTERIM URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENACTED PURSUANT TO
GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65858 EXTENDING FOR AN
ADDITIONAL 10 MONTHS AND 15 DAYS, THROUGH APRIL 20, 2022,
AN EXISTING MORATORIUM ON THE APPROVAL OF APPLICATIONS
FOR BUILDING PERMITS OR OTHER ENTITLEMENTS FOR NEW
SERVICE STATION USES OR THE EXPANSION OF EXISTING
SERVICE STATION USES IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
DECLARING THE URGENCY THEREOF AND MAKING A
DETERMINATION OF EXEMPTION UNDER THE CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA)
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOES HEREBY
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Legislative Findings.
A. Subsection F(9) of Section 17.32.020 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code
defines a "service station" as a "retail business selling gasoline or other motor vehicle fuels." For
the purpose of this Interim Urgency Ordinance, a service station shall be limited to those retail
businesses selling motor vehicle fuels derived from liquid fossil fuels. In this context, a service
station is commonly referred to as a gas station.
B. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has classified service stations and
fuel storage locations as uses that may result in a brownfield site. Brownfield sites are properties,
the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence or potential
presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant.
C. Common contaminants found at service station sites include gasoline, diesel, and
petroleum oil, volatile organic compounds and solvents, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, and
lead. Exposure to the types of contaminants present, or potentially present, at service stations
threatens the public health, safety or welfare of neighboring communities.
D. There are thirty-two service stations currently in operation in the City of Rancho
Cucamonga. There are an additional two more service stations that are currently in plan check
review for building permit or under construction. Many of the existing service stations are located
near sensitive receptors. The close proximity of service stations to these areas increases the risk
of contaminant exposure to vulnerable populations. This problem is exacerbated in situations
where the service station may become a brownfield site.
D. A disproportionate amount of the City's existing service stations are concentrated
in the southwest and central areas of the City. Thirteen service stations are located in District 2
and eleven are located in District 3. In contrast, Districts 1 and 4 have only five service stations
each. The proliferation of service stations in Districts 2 and 3 inequitably increases health risks
for the residents of these districts due to the potential contaminants present at service stations.
As a matter of environmental justice, the City Council must carefully consider how such uses are
zoned under the City's General Plan and Development Code in order to avoid an undue
concentration of service stations in any one part of the City.
Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 981 - Page 1 of 7
ATTACHMENT 5
Page 130
E. Based on data provided by the Sheriff's Department, the amount of criminal activity
that occurs specifically at service stations necessitates that police services be routinely deployed
to service stations. Over the past five years, the number of calls for service at service stations has
steadily increased. In 2020, a total of 1,059 calls for service were made at service stations in the
City, resulting in approximately 2,455 hours of police time spent policing and protecting service
stations. The development of additional service stations within the City would result in additional
strains on police services to counter the potential for increased criminal activity.
G. The increased criminal activity associated with service stations threatens the
health, safet} and welfare of all residents, but particularly those within the southwest and central
areas of the City, due to the inequitable concentration of service stations in those areas. The City
Council believes the location and proliferation of service stations in certain areas of the City
requires further regulation to ensure that the negative effects of service stations can be curtailed
in order to better protect the public.
H. Altogether, the existing location and concentration of service stations in the City
mean that drivers need only drive approximately five minutes in order to reach most existing
service stations in the City. Applications for additional service stations continue to be submitted
to the City despite the already high concentration of service stations in the City and declining
demand.
I.The declining demand for gasoline is partly demonstrated by the decline in annual
service station revenues in the City. According to revenue estimates reported to the City by
existing service stations, such revenues have declined by over half a million dollars from 2019 to
2020, echoing global trends, which have seen the decline in service stations over the past ten
years due to a variety of factors, including the proliferation of electric vehicles, shared mobility
solutions, and alternative fuel options.
J.Furthermore, vehicle technology is rapidly evolving such that reliance on gas is
steadily declining. According to a report from the Boston Consulting Group, it is estimated that by
2030, more than one third of all new vehicles will be fully or partially electric. Charging for electric
vehicles can take place in a variety of locations such as at home, work and in parking lots. Ride-
sharing solutions further reduce demand for gasoline as car ownership becomes more obsolete.
By 2035, shared mobility solutions such as Uber, Lyft, and Zipcar are expected to account for
nearly 20% of on-road passenger miles. Meanwhile, alternative fuel options such as hydrogen
fuel, liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), compressed natural gas, and biofuels are increasing their
share in the gasoline and diesel markets.
K. The declining demand for gasoline may increase competition amongst the existing
service stations in the City such that closures may occur over time. Due to their propensity to
become brownfield sites, service stations require significant investment to remediate any potential
ground contamination prior to redevelopment. Closed sites may be abandoned and left unused
for years and removal of contaminants may present health risks for neighboring communities and
sensitive receptors. Additional closures could result in increased blight and dangerous conditions
throughout the City,thereby threatening public health, safety and welfare.The City Council wishes
to assess the appropriate concentration and locations of service stations given declining demand.
L. There are thirty-two service stations currently in operation in the City of Rancho
Cucamonga. The City has received applications for additional service stations to be constructed
at the corner of 9th Street and Archibald Avenue and at the northeast corner of Arrow Route and
Grove Avenue. The proposed service station at the corner of 9th Street and Archibald Avenue
Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 981 - Page 2 of 7
Page 131
was approved by the Planning Commission, but has since been appealed to the City Council. An
additional service station to be redeveloped and expanded two blocks north at the corner of
Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route and another to be redeveloped at Foothill Boulevard and Red
Hill Country Club Drive have previously been approved by the Planning Commission, but have
not yet completed plan check and no building permits have been issued. These service station
projects would be located within the southwest part of the City, an area with an already high
concentration of service stations. Based on all of the foregoing impacts associated with the
development of service stations, the City Council therefore finds there is a current and immediate
threat to the public health, safety and welfare that is presented by pending applications for land
use entitlements and building permits to develop new service stations and expand or remodel
existing service stations within the City, and that a moratorium is necessary.
M. The City is responsible for adopting and implementing land use regulations within
its boundaries. The Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code generally regulates the entitlement and
establishment of service stations within the City, but it does not specify development or
operational standards such that the City can mitigate the impacts caused by service stations.
N. On April 21, 2021, the City Council approved Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 980,
which imposed an initial 45-day moratorium on the approval of applications for building permits
or other entitlements for new service station uses or the expansion of existing service station uses
during the pendency of the City's review and adoption of permanent regulations governing service
stations. The initial 45-day moratorium is scheduled to expire on June 5, 2021.
O. The City Council continues to believe that the time provided by the moratorium will
allow for a comprehensive analysis on how to manage and reduce the impact of additional service
stations in the City, or if additional service stations or the expansion of existing service stations
should be permitted. During the extended period of the moratorium, the City will continue to
analyze their potential impacts on the public health such as the potential for contaminant exposure
near sensitive receptors and residential areas; impacts on public safety related to the provision of
police services to service stations; and impacts on the public welfare due to the disproportionate
concentration of service stations in certain residential areas of the City and potential for blight in
connection with declining demand for gas. The City Council finds that these studies will help the
Council and the City's Planning Department determine how best to prevent impacts to the public
health, safety and welfare. The City Council further finds that this extension will allow time to
evaluate the General Plan, the Development Code, and the Zoning map and develop appropriate
regulations and/or appropriate zones for service stations in the City to achieve a reasonable level
of assurance that there will not be serious negative impacts to the overall community and ensure
positive outcomes for the City's residents, business community, property owners, and developers.
P. Based on the foregoing, the City Council ultimately finds that if the City fails to
extend the moratorium adopted pursuant to Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 980, then new service
stations may be allowed to develop within the City or be redeveloped or expanded within the City
that do not reflect the demand for such services, are incompatible with neighboring residential
areas and sensitive receptors, and exacerbate existing public safety issues at service stations.
Therefore, a current and immediate threat to the public safety, health and welfare remains in
existence.
Q. A written report describing the measures taken to alleviate the conditions which
led to the adoption of the aforementioned Interim Urgency Ordinance was issued by the City
Council on May 5, 2021, which was at least ten (10) days prior to the expiration of the Interim
Urgency Ordinance on June 5, 2021, in compliance with State law.
Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 981 - Page 3 of 7
Page 132
R. Pursuant to Government Code Sections 65858 and 65090, the City Council
conducted a duly noticed public hearing on June 2, 2021, at which time the City Council
considered this Interim Urgency Ordinance to extend the existing 45-day moratorium on the
establishment or expansion of service stations for an additional 10 months and 15 days.
SECTION 2. Authority.
Pursuant to Government Code Section 65858, the City Council may adopt, as an urgency
measure, an interim ordinance that prohibits any uses that may be in conflict with a contemplated
zoning proposal that the City Council is considering, studying, or intends to study within a
reasonable period of time. The City Council may also extend a moratorium adopted pursuant to
such an interim ordinance for up to 10 months and 15 days, and subsequently for up to one year,
pursuant to Government Code Section 65858(a).
SECTION 3. Urgency Findings.
The City Council finds and determines that there is an immediate threat to the public
health, safety, or welfare, and that new and expanded service station uses within the City, under
the City's current regulations, constitutes a threat to the public health, safety or welfare. As
described in Section 1, the staff report accompanying this Interim Urgency Ordinance, and other
evidence in the record, such continued service station development in the City could threaten the
health, safety and welfare of the community through negative impacts that include, but are not
limited to, public safety, contaminant exposure, and police protection services. To preserve the
public health, safety, and welfare, the City Council finds that it is necessary that this Interim
Urgency Ordinance to extend the current moratorium on service stations take effect immediately
pursuant to Government Code Sections 65858, 36934, and 36937 to prevent such harm.
SECTION 4. Moratorium Extended.
A. Based on the facts and findings set forth in Sections 1 through 3 of this Interim
Urgency Ordinance, and notwithstanding any other ordinance or provision of the Rancho
Cucamonga Municipal Code, the City Council hereby extends through and including April 20,
2022, the existing moratorium on the approval of applications for the development of new service
station uses or the expansion of existing service station uses, adopted pursuant to Interim
Urgency Ordinance No. 980 (the "Moratorium").
B. No application for a building permit or any other entitlement, including a design
review or conditional use permit, authorizing construction of a new service station use or the
expansion of an existing service station use, including the expansion of accessory uses on the
same site, shall be approved during the term of the Moratorium.
C. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Moratorium shall not apply to the following:
1) The improvement, renovation, or demolition of an existing service station, provided that such
development otherwise conforms to applicable law, does not result in an increase to the number
of gas pumping facilities, does not add any new accessory uses on site, and does not require a
discretionary entitlement to perform such improvement, renovation, or demolition; or
2) An application for a service station that has been deemed complete or received all
discretionary entitlements as of the moratorium's effective date, provided that the City has issued
a building permit for construction or redevelopment of the proposed service station within six
Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 981 - Page 4 of 7
Page 133
months of the Moratorium's initial effective date of April 21, 2021. The Moratorium shall thereafter
apply to these applications if a building permit has not been issued within that six-month period.
D. For the purposes of this Interim Urgency Ordinance, the term "service station"shall
have the same meaning prescribed in Subsection F(9) of Section 17.32.020 of the Rancho
Cucamonga Municipal Code, except that it shall be limited to retail business selling gasoline or
other motor vehicle fuels derived from fossil fuels (e.g., petroleum).
SECTION 6. Special Conditional Use Permit.
Notwithstanding any other provision of this Interim Urgency Ordinance, the City of Rancho
Cucamonga may accept, process and approve applications for special conditional use permits for
development or use of property otherwise subject to Section 4 of this Interim Urgency Ordinance,
if the City Council finds, after receipt of a recommendation from the Planning Commission, that
an owner of property subject to the Moratorium will be deprived of all economically viable use of
his or her land unless the property owner is allowed to develop or use the property for a service
station, or that the law of California or of the United States otherwise requires the City to approve
an application for a permit or an entitlement for the development or use. The special conditional
use permit provided by this Section shall be an available entitlement process and permit for a
property owner affected by the Moratorium whether or not a conditional use permit would
otherwise be required by the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. A special conditional use
permit submitted pursuant to this Section shall be processed in accordance with Chapter 17.14
of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, except that the City Council shall serve as the final
decision-making body, which shall make the additional findings required by this Section prior to
approving the special conditional use permit.
SECTION 7. Enforcement.
The provisions of this Interim Urgency Ordinance shall be enforceable pursuant to the
general enforcement provisions in Title 1 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code.
SECTION 8. CEQA Findinqs.
The City Council hereby finds that it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility
that the adoption of this Interim Urgency Ordinance may have a significant effect on the
environment, because the Interim Urgency Ordinance will extend an existing temporary
moratorium on approvals of applications for service station uses in the City in order to protect the
public health, safety and general welfare, and will thereby serve to avoid potentially significant
adverse environmental impacts during the term of the moratorium. It is therefore not subject to
the California Environmental Quality Act review pursuant to Title 14, Chapter 3, Section
15061(b)(3) of the California Code of Regulations.
SECTION 9. Severability.
If any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this
Interim Urgency Ordinance or its application to any person or circumstances, is for any reason
held to be invalid or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or
unenforceability shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the remaining sections,
subsections, subdivisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses or phrases of this Interim Urgency
Ordinance, or its application to any other person or circumstance. The City Council hereby
declares that it would have adopted each section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence,
Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 981 - Page 5 of 7
Page 134
clause, phrase hereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections,
subdivisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses or phrases hereof be declared invalid or
unenforceable.
SECTION 10. Effective Date: Approval and Extension of Ordinance.
This Interim Urgency Ordinance, being adopted as an urgency measure for the immediate
protection of ithe public safety, health, and general welfare, containing a declaration of the facts
constituting t1ke urgency, and passed by a minimum four-fifths (4/5) vote of the City Council, shall
take effect immediately upon its adoption and shall continue in effect for a period of not longer
than forty-five (45) days. After notice pursuant to Government Code Section 65090 and a public
hearing, the City Council may extend the effectiveness of this Urgency Ordinance as provided in
GovernmentCode Section 65858.
SEC ION 11. Term.
This Interim Urgency Ordinance shall take effect concurrent with the expiration of Urgency
Ordinance No. 980 at midnight on June 5, 2021, and shall remain in effect for a period of ten (10)
months, fifteen (15) days, through and including April 20, 2022, in accordance with California
Government Code Section 65858.
SECTION 12. Publication.
The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Interim Urgency Ordinance
and shall cause its publication in accordance with applicable law.
Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 981 - Page 6 of 7
Page 135
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 2"d day of June, 2021.
0A X
Dennis Michael, or
ATTEST:
J§fiice C. Reynolds,tity Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) ss
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA )
I, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify
that the foregoing Interim Urgency Ordinance was passed and adopted by a 4/5 vote at a regular
meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 2nd day of June, 2021,
by the following vote:
AYES: Hutchison, Kennedy, Michael, Scott, Spagnolo
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAINED: None
Executed this 3rd day of June 2021, at Rancho Cucamonga, California.
qa nice C. Reynolds, ityClerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
J es L. Markman, City Attorney
Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 981 - Page 7 of 7
Page 136
Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 999 - Page 1 of 7
INTERIM URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. 999
AN INTERIM URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ENACTED
PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65858 EXTENDING
FOR AN ADDITIONAL ONE YEAR, THROUGH APRIL 20, 2023, AN
EXISTING MORATORIUM ON THE APPROVAL OF APPLICATIONS
FOR BUILDING PERMITS OR OTHER ENTITLEMENTS FOR NEW
SERVICE STATION USES OR THE EXPANSION OF EXISTING
SERVICE STATION USES IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
DECLARING THE URGENCY THEREOF AND MAKING A
DETERMINATION OF EXEMPTION UNDER THE CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA)
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOES HEREBY
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1.Legislative Findings.
A. Subsection F(8) of Section 17.32.020 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code
defines a “service station,” in relevant part, as a “retail business selling gasoline or other motor
vehicle fuels.” For the purpose of this Interim Urgency Ordinance, a service station shall be limited
to those retail businesses selling motor vehicle fuels derived from liquid fossil fuels. In this
context, a service station is commonly referred to as a gas station.
B. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has classified service stations and
fuel storage locations as uses that may result in a brownfield site. Brownfield sites are properties,
the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence or potential
presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant.
C. Common contaminants found at service station sites include gasoline, diesel, and
petroleum oil, volatile organic compounds and solvents, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, and
lead. Exposure to the types of contaminants present, or potentially present, at service stations
threatens the public health, safety or welfare of neighboring communities.
D. There are thirty-two service stations currently in operation in the City of Rancho
Cucamonga. At the time that that moratorium that is the subject of this Interim Urgency Ordinance
was first adopted, there were two more service stations that were in plan check review for building
permit or under construction. Many of the existing service stations are located near sensitive
receptors. The close proximity of service stations to these areas increases the risk of contaminant
exposure to vulnerable populations. This problem is exacerbated in situations where the service
station may become a brownfield site.
D. A disproportionate amount of the City’s existing service stations are concentrated
in the southwest and central areas of the City. Thirteen service stations are located in District 2
and eleven are located in District 3. In contrast, Districts 1 and 4 have only five service stations
each. The proliferation of service stations in Districts 2 and 3 inequitably increases health risks
for the residents of these districts due to the potential contaminants present at service stations.
As a matter of environmental justice, the City Council must carefully consider how such uses are
zoned under the City’s General Plan and Development Code in order to avoid an undue
concentration of service stations in any one part of the City.
ATTACHMENT 6
Page 137
Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 999 - Page 2 of 7
E. Based on data provided by the Sheriff’s Department, the amount of criminal activity
that occurs specifically at service stations necessitates that police services be routinely deployed
to service stations. Over the past five years, the number of calls for service at service stations has
steadily increased. In 2020, a total of 1,059 calls for service were made at service stations in the
City, resulting in approximately 2,455 hours of police time spent policing and protecting service
stations. Data for 2021 is not yet available. The development of additional service stations within
the City would result in additional strains on police services to counter the potential for increased
criminal activity.
G. The increased criminal activity associated with service stations threatens the
health, safety and welfare of all residents, but particularly those within the southwest and central
areas of the City, due to the inequitable concentration of service stations in those areas. The City
Council believes the location and proliferation of service stations in certain areas of the City
requires further regulation to ensure that the negative effects of service stations can be curtailed
in order to better protect the public.
H. Altogether, the existing location and concentration of service stations in the City
mean that drivers need only drive approximately five minutes in order to reach most existing
service stations in the City. When the moratorium on service stations was first adopted,
applications for additional service stations were being submitted to the City despite the already
high concentration of service stations in the City and declining demand.
I. The declining demand for gasoline is partly demonstrated by the decline in annual
service station revenues in the City. According to revenue estimates reported to the City by
existing service stations, such revenues have declined by over half a million dollars from 2019 to
2020, echoing global trends, which have seen the decline in service stations over the past ten
years due to a variety of factors, including the proliferation of electric vehicles, shared mobility
solutions, and alternative fuel options.
J. Furthermore, vehicle technology is rapidly evolving such that reliance on gas is
steadily declining. According to a report from the Boston Consulting Group, it is estimated that by
2030, more than one third of all new vehicles will be fully or partially electric. Charging for electric
vehicles can take place in a variety of locations such as at home, work and in parking lots. Ride-
sharing solutions further reduce demand for gasoline as car ownership becomes more obsolete.
By 2035, shared mobility solutions such as Uber, Lyft, and Zipcar are expected to account for
nearly 20% of on-road passenger miles. Meanwhile, alternative fuel options such as hydrogen
fuel, liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), compressed natural gas, and biofuels are increasing their
share in the gasoline and diesel markets.
K. The declining demand for gasoline may increase competition amongst the existing
service stations in the City such that closures may occur over time. Due to their propensity to
become brownfield sites, service stations require significant investment to remediate any potential
ground contamination prior to redevelopment. Closed sites may be abandoned and left unused
for years and removal of contaminants may present health risks for neighboring communities and
sensitive receptors. Additional closures could result in increased blight and dangerous conditions
throughout the City, thereby threatening public health, safety and welfare. The City Council wishes
to assess the appropriate concentration and locations of service stations given declining demand.
L. There are thirty-two service stations currently in operation in the City of Rancho
Cucamonga. The City received applications for additional service stations to be constructed at
Page 138
Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 999 - Page 3 of 7
the northeast corner of Arrow Route and Grove Avenue. An additional service station to be
redeveloped and expanded two blocks north at the corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route
and another to be redeveloped at Foothill Boulevard and Red Hill Country Club Drive have been
approved by the Planning Commission and are under constructions. These service station
projects would be located within the southwest part of the City, an area with an already high
concentration of service stations. Based on all of the foregoing impacts associated with the
development of service stations, the City Council therefore finds there is a current and immediate
threat to the public health, safety and welfare that is presented by pending applications for land
use entitlements and building permits to develop new service stations and expand or remodel
existing service stations within the City, and that a moratorium is necessary.
M. The City is responsible for adopting and implementing land use regulations within
its boundaries. The Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code generally regulates the entitlement and
establishment of service stations within the City, but it does not specify development or
operational standards such that the City can mitigate the impacts caused by service stations.
N. On April 21, 2021, the City Council approved Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 980,
which imposed an initial 45-day moratorium on the approval of applications for building permits
or other entitlements for new service station uses or the expansion of existing service station uses
during the pendency of the City’s review and adoption of permanent regulations governing service
stations. The initial 45-day moratorium expired on June 5, 2021.
O. On June 2, 2021, the City Council adopted Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 981 to
extend the moratorium on service station uses by 10 months and 15 days, through April 20, 2022.
O. The City Council continues to believe that the time provided by the moratorium will
allow for a comprehensive analysis on how to manage and reduce the impact of additional service
stations in the City, or if additional service stations or the expansion of existing service stations
should be permitted. During the extended period of the moratorium, the City will continue to
analyze their potential impacts on the public health such as the potential for contaminant exposure
near sensitive receptors and residential areas; impacts on public safety related to the provision of
police services to service stations; and impacts on the public welfare due to the disproportionate
concentration of service stations in certain residential areas of the City and potential for blight in
connection with declining demand for gas. The City Council finds that these studies will help the
Council and the City’s Planning Department determine how best to prevent impacts to the public
health, safety and welfare. The City Council further finds that this extension will allow time to
evaluate the General Plan, the Development Code, and the Zoning map and develop appropriate
regulations and/or appropriate zones for service stations in the City to achieve a reasonable level
of assurance that there will not be serious negative impacts to the overall community and ensure
positive outcomes for the City’s residents, business community, property owners, and developers.
P. Based on the foregoing, the City Council ultimately finds that if the City fails to
further extend the moratorium adopted pursuant to Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 980, then new
service stations may be allowed to develop within the City or be redeveloped or expanded within
the City that do not reflect the demand for such services, are incompatible with neighboring
residential areas and sensitive receptors, and exacerbate existing public safety issues at service
stations. Therefore, a current and immediate threat to the public safety, health and welfare
remains in existence.
Q. A written report describing the measures taken to alleviate the conditions which
led to the adoption of the aforementioned Interim Urgency Ordinance was issued by the City
Page 139
Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 999 - Page 4 of 7
Council on March 16, 2022, which was at least ten (10) days prior to the extension of the
moratorium on April 6, 2022, in compliance with State law.
R. Pursuant to Government Code Sections 65858 and 65090, the City Council
conducted a duly noticed public hearing on April 6, 2022, at which time the City Council
considered this Interim Urgency Ordinance to extend the existing moratorium on the
establishment or expansion of service station uses for an additional one year.
SECTION 2.Authority.
Pursuant to Government Code Section 65858, the City Council may adopt, as an urgency
measure, an interim ordinance that prohibits any uses that may be in conflict with a contemplated
zoning proposal that the City Council is considering, studying, or intends to study within a
reasonable period of time. The City Council may also extend a moratorium adopted pursuant to
such an interim ordinance for up to 10 months and 15 days, and subsequently for up to one year,
pursuant to Government Code Section 65858(a).
SECTION 3.Urgency Findings.
The City Council finds and determines that there is an immediate threat to the public
health, safety, or welfare, and that new and expanded service station uses within the City, under
the City’s current regulations, constitutes a threat to the public health, safety or welfare. As
described in Section 1, the staff report accompanying this Interim Urgency Ordinance, and other
evidence in the record, such continued service station development in the City could threaten the
health, safety and welfare of the community through negative impacts that include, but are not
limited to, public safety, contaminant exposure, and police protection services. To preserve the
public health, safety, and welfare, the City Council finds that it is necessary that this Interim
Urgency Ordinance to extend the current moratorium on service stations take effect immediately
pursuant to Government Code Sections 65858, 36934, and 36937 to prevent such harm.
SECTION 4.Moratorium Extended.
A. Based on the facts and findings set forth in Sections 1 through 3 of this Interim
Urgency Ordinance, and notwithstanding any other ordinance or provision of the Rancho
Cucamonga Municipal Code, the City Council hereby extends through and including April 20,
2023, the existing moratorium on the approval of applications for the development of new service
station uses or the expansion of existing service station uses, first adopted pursuant to Interim
Urgency Ordinance No. 980 and extended by Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 981 (the
“Moratorium”).
B. No application for a building permit or any other entitlement, including a design
review or conditional use permit, authorizing construction of a new service station use or the
expansion of an existing service station use, including the expansion of accessory uses on the
same site, shall be approved during the term of the Moratorium.
C. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Moratorium shall not apply to the following:
(1) The improvement, renovation, or demolition of an existing service station, provided that such
development otherwise conforms to applicable law, does not result in an increase to the number
of gas pumping facilities, does not add any new accessory uses on site, and does not require a
discretionary entitlement to perform such improvement, renovation, or demolition; or
Page 140
Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 999 - Page 5 of 7
(2) An application for a service station that has been deemed complete or received all
discretionary entitlements as of the moratorium’s effective date, provided that the City has issued
a building permit for construction or redevelopment of the proposed service station within six
months of the Moratorium’s initial effective date of April 21, 2021. The Moratorium shall thereafter
apply to these applications if a building permit has not been issued within that six-month period.
D. For the purposes of this Interim Urgency Ordinance, the term “service station” shall
have the same meaning prescribed in Subsection F(8) of Section 17.32.020 of the Rancho
Cucamonga Municipal Code, except that it shall be limited to retail business selling gasoline or
other motor vehicle fuels derived from fossil fuels (e.g., petroleum).
SECTION 6.Special Conditional Use Permit.
Notwithstanding any other provision of this Interim Urgency Ordinance, the City of Rancho
Cucamonga may accept, process and approve applications for special conditional use permits for
development or use of property otherwise subject to Section 4 of this Interim Urgency Ordinance,
if the City Council finds, after receipt of a recommendation from the Planning Commission, that
an owner of property subject to the Moratorium will be deprived of all economically viable use of
his or her land unless the property owner is allowed to develop or use the property for a service
station, or that the law of California or of the United States otherwise requires the City to approve
an application for a permit or an entitlement for the development or use. The special conditional
use permit provided by this Section shall be an available entitlement process and permit for a
property owner affected by the Moratorium whether or not a conditional use permit would
otherwise be required by the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. A special conditional use
permit submitted pursuant to this Section shall be processed in accordance with Chapter 17.14
of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, except that the City Council shall serve as the final
decision-making body, which shall make the additional findings required by this Section prior to
approving the special conditional use permit.
SECTION 7.Enforcement.
The provisions of this Interim Urgency Ordinance shall be enforceable pursuant to the
general enforcement provisions in Title 1 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code.
SECTION 8. CEQA Findings.
The City Council hereby finds that it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility
that the adoption of this Interim Urgency Ordinance may have a significant effect on the
environment, because the Interim Urgency Ordinance will extend an existing temporary
moratorium on approvals of applications for service station uses in the City in order to protect the
public health, safety and general welfare, and will thereby serve to avoid potentially significant
adverse environmental impacts during the term of the moratorium. It is therefore not subject to
the California Environmental Quality Act review pursuant to Title 14, Chapter 3, Section
15061(b)(3) of the California Code of Regulations.
SECTION 9. Severability.
If any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this
Interim Urgency Ordinance or its application to any person or circumstances, is for any reason
held to be invalid or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or
Page 141
Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 999 - Page 6 of 7
unenforceability shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the remaining sections,
subsections, subdivisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses or phrases of this Interim Urgency
Ordinance, or its application to any other person or circumstance. The City Council hereby
declares that it would have adopted each section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence,
clause, phrase hereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections,
subdivisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses or phrases hereof be declared invalid or
unenforceable.
SECTION 10. Effective Date.
This Interim Urgency Ordinance, being adopted as an urgency measure for the immediate
protection of the public safety, health, and general welfare, containing a declaration of the facts
constituting the urgency, and passed by a minimum four-fifths (4/5) vote of the City Council, shall
take effect immediately upon its adoption.
SECTION 11. Term.
This Interim Urgency Ordinance shall take effect concurrent with the expiration of Urgency
Ordinance No. 981 at midnight on April 20, 2022, and shall remain in effect for a period of one
year, through and including April 20, 2023, in accordance with California Government Code
Section 65858.
SECTION 12. Publication.
The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Interim Urgency Ordinance
and shall cause its publication in accordance with applicable law.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 6th day of April, 2022.
.
_____________________________
L. Dennis Michael, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________________
Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) ss
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA )
I, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify
that the foregoing Interim Urgency Ordinance was passed and adopted by a 4/5 vote at a regular
meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 6th day of April, 2022,
by the following vote:
Page 142
Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 999 - Page 7 of 7
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAINED:
Executed this __ day of ______, 2022, at Rancho Cucamonga, California.
_________________________________
Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_________________________________
Nicholas R. Ghirelli, City Attorney
Page 143
Interim Moratorium on Service Stations
City Council
April 6, 2022
Background
•City Council directed staff to conduct an analysis of service
stations;
•Staff gathered representatives from other City Departments
for input and analysis;
•Initial results of our analysis
CARTILLA AVELocation of
Service Stations
Quantity by District•District 1 –5 stations•District 2 –13 stations •District 3 –11
stations*•District 4 –5 stations
34 service stations total;
23 currently sell alcohol
*most recent approval
occurred in 2011 –
Ralph’s Gas on Haven
Avenue
CARTILLA AVEDriving Time to
Service Stations
(5 minutes)
Areas in blue are within5minutesdrivetimeofaservicestation.
Note:this does notincludethedrivetimetoaservicestationoutsidetheCity.
Annual Sales Tax -Revenue Analysis
(2008 –2020)
N
$-
$0.50
$1.00
$1.50
$2.00
$2.50
$3.00
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020Millions Year Annual Sales Tax Revenue
2008 $2,041,400.68
2009 $1,615,184.14
2010 $1,868,335.21
2011 $2,238,239.53
2012 $2,426,457.82
2013 $2,261,404.95
2014 $2,244,070.71
2015 $2,049,208.59
2016 $1,768,133.12
2017 $1,816,753.47
2018 $2,031,354.18
2019 $2,194,465.74
2020 $1,496,374.00
Public Safety Service Calls Analysis
N
Service Stations -Public Safety Services Analysis
TOTAL CALLS FOR SERVICE 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 5 YEAR
AVERAGE
At Service Stations 637 910 1034 979 1059
Incomplete
Data
923.8
City Overall 146,254 159,059 155,537 151,562 142,344 150,951
Percentage of Calls at Service
Stations Relative to the City
(overall)
0.44%0.57%0.66%0.65%0.74%0.61%
TIME SPENT ON LOCATION
(HOURS)2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 5 YEAR
AVERAGE
At Service Stations 1,100.75 1,867.44 1,982.12 1,946.32 2,455.44
Incomplete
Data
1,870.41
City Overall 158,217.
34
227,420.
26
220,288.
82
231,371.
81
216,508.
65 210,761.38
Percentage of Time at Service
Stations Relative to the City
(overall)
0.70%0.82%0.90%0.84%1.13%0.88%
City Population
Data
2015: 175,232
2016: 176,540
2017: 177,446
2018: 177,742
2019: 177,614
2020: 174,453
2021: not available
Background
•City Council adopted on April 21,2021 Urgency Ordinance 980
for an interim moratorium on the development of new service
stations and expansion of existing service stations
•Moratorium extended to a full year on June 2,2021
•Current moratorium expires on April 20,2022
•Updated General Plan adopted by City Council on 12/15/2021;
•Updated Development Code pending adoption;
•Existing regulations don’t comprehensively address potential
impacts of service stations;
•Environmental impacts due to long term use and underground fuel
storage resulting in “brownfield sites;
•Major streets and intersections identified in the General Plan as
sites for gateway development;
•Environmental justice perspective;and
•Regulations and permitting process to avoid undue concentration
Analysis -General Plan and Development Code
Ongoing Activity and Next Steps
Staff is in the process of:
o Collecting additional information and conducting further
analysis of data;
o Preparing amendments to the Development
Code and/or the Zoning Map;
o Coordinating with other City Departments;
o Study session with Planning Commission for feedback
and comments;and
o Provide recommendations to the City Council
.
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Ordinance No.999
extending the Interim Moratorium on New Service Station
Development to April 20,2023
Staff Recommendation
DATE:April 6, 2022
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services
Noah Daniels, Finance Director
SUBJECT:Consideration of the City Council Community Parks and Landscape
Citizens' Oversight Subcommittee's Recommendation to Appoint
Members to the Community Parks and Landscape Citizens' Oversight
Committee. (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the City Council approve the Community Parks and Landscape Citizens'
Oversight Subcommittee's recommendation to appoint Denise Garzaro, Pascal Pangestu, and
Matthew Parmental to the Community Parks and Landscape Citizens' Oversight Committee.
BACKGROUND:
On August 7, 2019, the City Council adopted Resolution 19-075, establishing the Community
Parks and Landscape Citizens' Oversight Committee. The purpose of the Committee is to review
the annual financial audits of certain districts to provide oversight of the revenues and to
communicate with property owners regarding how their community parks and landscaping are
maintained and funded.
Per the Resolution, a City Council Subcommittee must review the applications, interview, and
recommend committee members for appointment to the City Council. Appointed committee
members serve four-year terms. Three committee members' terms have expired or are expiring:
Otis Greer, expired on February 28, 2022
David DeMauro, expiring on July 31, 2022
Denise Garzaro, expiring on July 31, 2022
Otis Greer and David DeMauro confirmed with the City Clerk the conclusion of their terms and
service on the Committee. Denise Garzaro indicated that she would like to continue to serve on
the Committee.
The City Clerk's Office posted a Notice of Upcoming Vacancies for the Committee on February 16,
2022. Three applications were submitted by the close of the application period on March 3, 2022.
ANALYSIS:
The City Council Subcommittee (Councilmembers Scott and Spagnolo) interviewed the
applicants on March 21, 2022 and recommends that the City Council appoint all three applicants
Page 144
Page 2
1
1
8
7
to the Committee based on their background and interest in serving the City and their community.
The three applications will serve the Committee for the following terms:
Denise Garzaro, August 1, 2022 to 2026
Pascal Pangestu, April 6, 2022 to 2026
Matthew Parmental, April 6, 2022 to 2026
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact.
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:
This item supports the City Council's core values of actively seeking and respectfully considering
all public input, and providing and nurturing a high quality of life for all.
ATTACHMENTS:
None
Page 145