HomeMy WebLinkAbout1991/10/16 - Agenda Packet A
CITY OF
RANCliO CUCAMC~GA
PLANNING COMMISSION
z AGENDA
1977
WEDNESDAY OCTOBER 16, 1991 5:00 P.M.
LUSKAND LINCOLN WORKSHOP
RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER
RAINS ROOM
10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
I. Roll Call
Commissioner Chitiea Commissioner Tolstoy
Commissioner McNiel Commissioner Vallette
Commissioner Melcher
II. Introduction
III. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 91-14 -
LUSK - The development of a 97 acre industrial master
plan within the Industrial Park District (Subarea 16) of
the Industrial Area Specific Plan, located at the
northwest corner of Archibald Avenue and Fourth Street -
APN: 210-062-02, 11, 13, 26, 31, 32, and 33.
IV. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT
15359 - LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY - A residential
subdivision and design review for the development of 264
apartment units on 15.09 .acres of land within the Medium
and Medium High Residential Districts (8-14 dwelling
units per acre and 14-.24 dwelling units per acre,
respectively) in the Victoria Planned Community, located
at the northeast corner of Base Line Road and Milliken
Avenue - APN: 227-691-01.
V. Adjournment
SUGGESTED WORKSHOP OUTLINE- DR 91-14
I. INTRODUCTION TO WORKSHOP (5 minutes)
II. DEVELOPER PRESENTATION (5 minutes)
- Background on site and previous approvals.
- Purpose of workshop.
III. DISCUSSION OF DESIGN GUIDELINES ]DOCUMENT (20 minutes)
A. Development Site Design
1. Is the parking/building envelope concept adequate or
should a more detailed (but still conceptual) pad
location be defined?
2. Are driveway access locations too flexible (p. II-1)?
3. Building orientation, parking layout, landscaping, and
circulation concepts provided are extremely conceptual
and too vague (p. II-1).
4. Access prints along local streets appear excessive.
Parcels should share access (p. II-2).
5. Circulation pattern is rigid and too gridiron in its
approach (p. II-2).
6. A conceptual building location and parking lot layout
should be provided for each parcel, rather than a
prototype for parcels according to land use types (p.
II-3 through 5).
7. Landscape coverage standards regarding width of planter
areas with trees is nd. nimal (p. II-7).
8. Parking setback and landscape depth titles have been
transposed (p. II-9).
9. Shared access between parcels is encouraged (p. II-12).
10. Parking shall be wholly contained on each individual
parcel unless a parking study is provided (p. II-13
through 15).
11. Loading areas are permitted only in rear and side yard
areas (p. II-16).
12. Pedestrian walkway guidelines are not adequate to
provide a unified and cohesive system throughout the
site (p. II-7).
13. No outdoor storage is permitted in Industrial Park
areas except for fleet vehicles and light trucks (p.
II-17).
IV. BUILDING ARCHITECTURAL GUIDELINES (10 minutes)
A. Generally, the section is too vague and does not provide
specific enough information regarding materials permitted or
not permitted. Additional information regarding building
mass and form, entry, and facade articulation should be
included (p III-1 through 8).
V. LANDSCAPE DESIGN GUIDELINES (10 minutes)
A. The landscape concept is underdeveloped in certain
aspects. Greenbelt and pedestrian walkways are not
discussed in the text or e~ibits.
B. Parking setback on Archibald Avenue is 35 feet, not 25 feet
as indicated on page IV-4.
C. Three trees per parking stall is required (p. IV-II).
D. Fifteen percent landscape coverage is bare minimum and
should be increased (p. IV-70).
VI. LAND USE (~0 minutes)
A. The general concept of limiting permitted and conditionally
permitted uses to specific areas of the master plan should
be discussed.
SUGGESTED WORKSHOP O~TLINE - VTT 15359
COMMENCEMENT (Scheduled for 6:00 p-m.)
INTRODUCTION: (5 minutes)
* Purpose of the courtesy workshop
* Project History/Design Parameters
* Format of Meeting
SITE PLAN CONSIDERATIONS: (25 minutes)
* Overall concept
* Land Use Transition (Internal and External)
* "Rigidity" of the site plan
- Building Orientation
- Parking area/drive aisle configurations
* Open space/amenities
* Other technical requirements
ARCHITECTURAL ISSUES: (25 minutes)
* Overall concept
* Unit variety/form
* Material Use/Color/Detailing
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCESS: (5 minutes)
* Courtesy Review/Workshops
* Formal Review Process
* Technical Requirements
* Relationship to Proposed Community Plan Amendments
* The next steps
ADJOURNMENT (Scheduled for 7:00 p.m.)