The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1992/04/08 - Agenda Packet~ " ~e~CITY OF r, PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA - 1977 WEDNESDAY APRIL 8, 1992 7:00 P.M. RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBER 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA I. Pledgeof Allegiance II. Roll Call Commissioner Chitiea Commissioner Tolstoy Commissioner McNiel Commissioner Vallette Commissioner Melcher III. A~nouncements IV. Approval of Minutes Adjourned Meeting of February 20, 1992 March 11, 1992 Adjourned Meeting of March 19, 1992 V. Consent Calendar The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted on by the Commission at one time without discussion. If anyone has concern over any item, it should be removed for discussion. A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 92-02 - JACK MASI C. Resolution of Denial for a request to expand the list of permitted and conditionally permitted uses in Subarea 7 of the Industrial Area Specific Plan to include certain retail and service-related activities. B. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 92-08 - LA PARRY - A resolution of approval for a request to establish a silk flower and gift shop totaling 612 square feet within the historic Albert House, on 1.23 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at 10323 19th Street - APN: 1076-151-02. C. TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 14459 - L. A. CHANCO - A residential subdivision of 37 single family lots, and design review thereof, on 8.3 acres of land in the Low Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located at the southeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Lemon Avenue - APN: 201-252-04, 40, 41, and 49. VI. Public Hearings The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related project. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. Please sign in after speaking. D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 13987 - LEWIS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY - The creation of a single 1.31 acre parcel for the development of a gas station, mini-market, and car wash in the Medium Residential designation (8-14 dwelling units per acre) of the Terra Vista Planned Community, located at the southwest corner of Base Line Road and Rochester Avenue - APN: 227-151-17. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. Related file: Conditional Use Permit 91-20. E. MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 91-03 - JAMES PAGE - A request to modify the hours of operation and to expand the permitted uses within an existing 103,522 square foot indoor wholesale/retail commercial use located within the General Industrial District (Subarea 11) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan at 11530 Sixth Street - APN: 229-262-28. (Continued from March 25, 1992.) F. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 14475 - SAHAMA INVESTMENTS - A public hearing to comment on the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report prepared for Vesting Tentative Tract 14475, a residential subdivision and design review of 71 single family residences on 113 acres of land in the Hillside Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per acre) and Open Space Districts, located north of Almond Avenue between Sapphire and Turquoise Streets - APN: 200-051-07, 55, 56, and 57. Staff recommends certification of the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report. (Continued from March 25, 1992.) G. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 14475 - SAHAMA INVESTMENTS - A residential subdivision and design review of 71 single family residences on 113 acres of land in the Hillside Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per acre) and Open Space Districts, located north of Almond Avenue between Sapphire and Turquoise Streets - APN: 200-051-07, 55, 56, and 57. Associated Tree Removal Permit No. 92-06. (Continued from March 25, 1992.) H. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 92-06 - COUTS OIL - A request to establish a 1,170 square foot office within an existing industrial park on 7.38 acres of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 8) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, located at 10700 Jersey Boulevard, Suite 700 - APN: 209-144-83. I. APPEAL OF TREE REMOVAL PERMIT 91-47 - LOS ANGELES COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION - An appeal of conditions of approval requiring replacement planting of 7 eucalyptus trees within the railroad right-of-way, located west of Hellman Avenue directly north of 7518 Pepper Street - APN: 208-011-05. J. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 92-07 - HIDE A WHILE - A request to expand an existing lounge by approximately 500 square feet within the existing Perry's Shopping Center in the Community Commercial District of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, located at 9469 Foothill Boulevard - APN: 208-261-40. (TO BE CONTINUED TO APRIL 22, 1992.) K. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 92-02 - INTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP OF CHURCHES - A request to establish a church within an existing industrial building in the General Industrial District (Subarea 4) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, located at 9746 Sixth Street - APN: 209-211-33. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. L. MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 90-37 - FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE PARTNERS - A request to amend certain conditions of approval for a previously approved 60-acre commercial retail center in the Regional Related Commercial Designation (Subarea 4) of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard between 1-15 and Etiwanda Avenue - APN: 229-031-03 through 13, '15, 16, 20, and a portion of 59. VII. New Business M. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 91-15 - MONARCH FOODS (SHAKEY'S) - The development of a 5,000 square foot restaurant within the Terra Vista Town Center in the Community Commercial District of the Terra Vista Planned Community, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, east of Haven Avenue - APN: 1077-421-76. VIII. Director's Reports N. DISCUSSION WITH SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT - Oral report IX. CommiSsion Business O. DESIGN REVIEW POLICIES - Oral report X. Public Comments This is the time and place for the general public to address the Commission. Items to be discussed here are those which do not already appear on this agenda. XI. Adjournment The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11:00 P.M. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission. VICINITY MAP CITY HALL CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 8, 1992 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Beverly Nissen, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 92-02 - JACK MASI C. 'Resolution of Denial for a request to expand the list of permitted and conditionally permitted uses in Subarea 7 of the Industrial Area Specific Plan to include certain retail and service-related activities. (Continued from March 25, 1992. ) BACKGROUND: The Planning Commission held hearings on this amendment request at their meetings of March 11 and 25, 1992. At the March 25 meeting, the Commission discussed the appropriateness of the requested amendment and determined that additional retail uses were not appropriate within Subarea 7 of the Industrial Area Specific Plan. At the close of the hearing, the Commission directed staff to draft a Resolution of Denial for their approval. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution of Denial. BB:BN/jfs Attachments: Resolution of Denial for ISPA 92-02, Part C ITS4 A RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCliO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING DENIAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 92-02, PART C, TO EXPAND THE LIST OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USES IN SUBAREA 7 OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF A. Recitals. (i) Jack Masi has filed an application for Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 92-02, Part C, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment request is referred to as "the application." (ii) On March ll and 25, 1992, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted duly noticed public hearings on the application and concluded said hearings'on March 25, 1992. (iii) At the March 25 hearing, the Commission directed staff to prepare a Resolution of Denial for adoption at the meeting of April 8, 1992. (iv) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW,-THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on March ll and 25, 1992, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to properties located within Subarea 7 of the Industrial Area Specific Plan; and (b) The General Plan designates the area south of Foothill Boulevard between Deer and Day Creeks as part of the Industrial Area Specific Plan; and (c) The purpose of the Industrial Area Specific Plan is to provide a broad range of primarily industrial and business support activities; and (d) The intent of the "Industrial Park" designation is to reserve land for light industrial uses, office and administration facilities, research and development laboratories, support businesses, and commercial service uses; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. ISPA 92-02, PART C - JACK MASI April 8, 1992 Page 2 (e) The applicant's request would add an extensive range of retail type uses (including Specialty Building Supplies and Home Improvements; Pet Stores, Pet Care, and Recreational Supplies and Services; and Home Furnishings and Appliances) to the list of uses already permitted in Subarea 7, Industrial Park; and (f) The extent of the retail uses requested is not consistent with the intent of Subarea 7, Industrial Park, and the retail uses proposed are only appropriate in areas zoned "Commercial"; and (g) There is already a more than adequate amount of land designated for such commercial uses throughout the community. According to the General Plan, there are currently 819 acres of vacant land designated for a wide variety of commercial uses. The creation of additional land zoned for such uses would adversely impact the existing and already planned retail areas within the City; and -. (h) Foothill Boulevard between Day and Deer Creeks is an important land use edge between the City's Industrial Area and community- oriented non-industrial areas to the north; (i} The intent of Subarea 7 is to function as a transitional area between the General Industrial areas to the south and the Commercial/Retail and Residential areas to the north of Foothill Boulevard. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearings and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs i and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) This amendment does conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will not provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and (b) That the proposed amendment is not consistent with the objectives of the Industrial Area Specific Plan and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and (c) That the proposed amendment is not in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Industrial Area Specific Plan; and (d) That the proposed amendment will be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and (e) That the proposed amendment will be detrimental to the objectives of the General Plan or the Industrial Area Specific Plan. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby resolves as follows: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. ISPA 92-02, PART C - JACK MASI April 8, 1992 Page 3 (a) That the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends denial of Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 92-02, Part C, to amend Table III-1, page IV-48, and Table III-2, as attached. 5. The Secretary to thie Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF APRIL 1992. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of April 1992, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: TABLE II!-1 SUMMARY OF LAND USE TYPE BY SUBAREA · PERMITTED USE "i' CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USE NOTE: Non-marked Uses Not Permitted USE TYPES ; Land Use* Subareas MANUFACTURING Custom Light :Medium Heavy OFFICE PROFESSIONAL; DESIGN & RESEARCI &dateImitative & Office Professional/Design Services WHOLESALE; STORAGE & l~ublic Slangs Light Medium Heavy COMMERCIAL AOrk~dtwaJ/Nswsery Sopplies & Services Animal Care AutomaUve Fleet Storage katemotive Rental/Leasing Automotive/Light Truck Repair-liHx Automotive / TruCk Repair-Maj.or Automotive Sake Automotive Service Station Building Contracto~'a Office & Yards Building Contrector's Storage Yard Building & LighUng Equipment :aimkeen 84app~ Retal & Services Business Support Services Convenience Sales & Services Entertainment Fast Food Sales Food & Beverage Sales ~}a ~ --~ Heavy Equipment Sales & Rentals _ '~.e~c~l .ospitai ~;p ~y Su 1 / Personal Services ..... ~har~acies & Specialty "'~n Hedic~Z/Health Stores /~1 ocreational Facilities · · e' Scrap Operation ~Specialty Building Supplies / and Home Improvements CIVIC Cultural ExteneivelmlactUtmtyFeemee Flood Control/UUllty CorTtdo~ Public Safety & Utility Services .... T~- __ · IP-Industrlel Park GI-General Industrial MI/HI-Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial HO-Haven Ave. Overlay District HI-Heavy Industrial Revised: 1/20/88 _II-5 8/15t9o 3/06/91 TABLE III-2 ADDITION TO: LAND USE TYPE DEFINITIONS D. COMMERCIAL USE TYPES Business Supply Retail and Services: Activities typically include, but are not limited to: Pete&½ sales, rental or repair ~Pem the ~Pem~eee of office equipment, furnishings, and e~ee supplies, e~ s~m~e~ e~ee ~ee~s ~me~y te ~ms em~ ether e~em~set~em~ ~t~e~m~ the 9eeds ~at~e~ t½em ~m~v~ea~s excluding materials used in construction. ~hey eMe~B~e the ee~e Business Support Services: Activities typically include, but are not limited to: services which support the activity of businesses, ~&~ms such as, clerical, employment, protective, messenger/facs~m{le services, postal/mail receiving and packaging, and minor processing, including blueprint services and multi-copying e~ ~amph~ets am~ eme~ Pepeats ~eP emetheP ~Pmv Activities not included in this classkfication are the printing of books and services of a personal nature- Home Furnishings and Appliances: Activities typically include, but are not limited to: sale of home furnishings (finished and ~nfinished), lighting, bedding, rugs and other accessories; used furniture; home furnishings repair and reupholstery; sale of home/garden appliances, televisions, VCRs, car phones, stereo and video equipment, telephones and other consumer electronics- The maximum size of any user is limited to 30,000 square feet. pharmacies and Specialty Medical/Health Stores: Activities typically include, but are not ]~m~ted to: sale of prescription and "over-the-counter" drugs, health and diet products, and incidental sales of beauty supplies- Uses excluded fr~ this cate~3ry are general merchandise "drug stores-" Medical and Hospital Supply: Activities typically include, but are not limited to: sale and rental of medical/hospital equipment, supplies, and prosthetic devices- Personal Services: Activities typically include, but are not limited to: information, instruction and similar services of a personal nature; ~T~ee~y ~me~eae~ ~et a~e me~ ~m~e~ ~e~ such as, computer training, driving schools, day care facilities, travel bureaus, and art/music/dance/martial arts/photographic ~hetegTaPhY studios- Specialty ~,j]din~ Supplies and Home Improvements: Activities typically include, but are not limited to: retail and wholesale sales and installation of specialty items, such as paint, wall/floor/window coverings, doors and windows, building materials, hardware, pl-mhing and electrical supplies, beth and kitchen fixtures and supplies, lighting, sw~e~ ng pools and supplies, and garden furnishings, materials and supplies- Activities shall be conducted in enclosed buildings of 25,888 square feet or less- Uses excluded from this category are general merchandise stores- SUBAREA7 Land Use Designation Industrial Park Primary Function Subarea 7 occupies an area directly south of Foothill Boulevard which represents an important land use edge between the City's Industrial Area and community oriented non- industrial area and is a gateway to the City. A major industrial, office, and commercial development on approximately 300 acres is currently undergoing phased construction- Within this area is a planned Civic Center which will include San Bernardino County and City offices. Permitted Uses Custom Manufacturing Light Manufacturing ~ Administrative and Office Professional/Design Services Research Services Light Wholesale, Storage, Distribution Building Maintenance Services Business Supply Retail Sales and Services Business Support Services Communication Services Eating and Drinking Establishments Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Services Hotel/Motel Administrative Civic Services Flood Control/Utility Corridor Conditional Uses Automotive Rental/Leasing Automotive Sales Automotive Service Station Convenience Sales and Services Cultural Entertainment Fast Food Sales Food and Beverage Sales ~'ome Furnishings and Appliances Medical/Health Care Services ~'~edical and Hospital Supply Personal Services Pharmacies and Specialty Medical Stores "~Public Assembly Public Safety and Utility Services Recreation Facilities Religious Assembly ~Specialty Building Supplies and Home --' F improvements IV-48 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 8, 1992 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Steve Hayes, Associate Planner SUBJECT: RESOLUTION OF APPROVAL FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 92-08 - LA PARRY - A Resolution for the approval of a request to establish a silk flower and gift shop totaling 612 square feet within the historic Albert House, on 1.23 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at 10323 19th Street - APN: 1076-151-02- BACKGROUND: On March 25, 1992, the Planning Commission considered the above-referenced project- Following public testimony and Commission discussion, the Planning Commission directed staff to prepare a revised Resolution of Approval outlining modified time frames for specific conditions of approval RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution of Approval for Conditional Use Permit 92-08. Resp lly su 'tted BB:SH:mlg Attachments: Resolution of Approval for Conditional Use Permit 92-08 ITI~4 B RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE pLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 92-08 FOR A SILK FLOWER AND GIFT SHOP TOTALING 612 SQUARE FEET WITHIN THE HISTORIC ALBERT HOUSE, ON 1.23 ACRES OF LAND IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACHE), LOCATED IN AT 10323 19TH STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1076-151-02. A. Recitals · (i) Filomena LaParty has filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use Permit No. 92-08 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application." ( ii ) On the 5th day of March 1992, the Historic Preservation Commission reviewed the application. (iii) On the 25th day of March 1992, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. At that meeting, the Planning Commission directed staff to prepare an amended Resolution of approval for the April 8, 1992, Planning Commission Consent Calendar. (iv) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution · NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on March 25, 1992, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at 10323 19th Street with a street frontage of 166 feet on 19th Street and a lot depth of 325.8 feet and is presently improved with the historic Henry Albert House; curb, gutter, sidewalk, and a wall exist along 19th Street; and curb and gutter exist along the Hamilton Street frontage; (b) The property to the north of the subject site is a vacant citrus grove, the property to the south contains single family residences under construction, the property to the east includes single family residences, and the property to the west consists of single family residences under construction; PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 92-08 - LA PARRY April 8, 1992 Page 2 ( c ) The Henry Albert House, in which the application is proposed, was designated as an Historic Landmark by the City Council on February 18, 1987; (d) The application contemplates the operation of a silk flower and gift shop utilizing the northerly 612 square feet of the first floor of the existing house; (e) The Development Code, Section 17.08.030.E7, permits small- scale, non-residential uses in historic residential structures subject to review and approval of a Conditional Use Permit; (f) The applicant proposes to operate the business from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m., seven days a week; and ( g ) No~ . additional employees other than the property owners will be employed in the business- 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located- ( b ) That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. (c) That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below: Planninq DiVision 1 ) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code and all other City ordinances- 2) If operation of the facility causes any safety problems or adverse effects upon adjacent residences, the Conditional Use Permit shall be brought before the Planning Commission for consideration and possible termination of the use. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 92-08 - LA PARRY April 8, 1992 Page 3 3) The proposed use, and occupancy thereof, shall not commence until such time as all Uniform (or Historic, as applicable) Building Code and Uniform Fire Code regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division to show compliance · The building shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy · 4 ) Two parking spaces shall be constructed directly adjacent to the circular driveway to accommodate visitors to the shop. The design of the parking area shall conform to current code requirements while utilizing materials that' are sensitive to the historic significance of the site. The specific parking lot design shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner, and shall be constructed prior to utilizing the residence as a gift and flower shop. 5) In a five-year period from the date of Planning Commission approval, a two-car garage shall be constructed that emulates the architecture of the Albert House. The plans for the garage shall be reviewed and approved by the Historic preservation Commission prior to issuance of building permits for the garage. A Landmark Alteration permit shall be filed in conjunction with the garage addition- A Disclosure Statement shall be prepared and recorded as to the deferred garage improvements for review and approval of the City Attorney within 90 days from the date of approval. 6) This Conditional Use Permit shall be reviewed by the Planning Commission five years from the date of approval to ensure compliance with the condition of approval requiring the two-car garage · 7 ) Street trees, ground cover, and a permanent irrigation system shall be provided along 19th Street in accordance with the 19th Street Master Plan within one-year of the date of Planning Commission approval · Detailed landscape/irrigation plans depicting conformance with the master plan shall be submitted for review and approval of the City Planner and City Engineer prior to installation · PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 92-08 - LA PARRY April 8, 1992 Page 4 8) Any permanent sign(s) shall reflect the architectural character of the Albert House and shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permits. Other temporary signs shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division per the guidelines established in the City's Comprehensive Sign Ordinance. 9) Hours of operation for the boutique shall be limited to 10 a.m. to 6 p.m., seven days a week. Any request for expanded business hours shall require review and approval of the Planning Commission. Enqineeriaq Division 1) The existing block wall along 19th Street shall be modified to improve visibility by replacing that portion of block wall not used for retaining purposes with decorative wrought iron fencing as approved by the City Engineer and City Planner. The fencing shall be of a design and color that is not obtrusive and allows unobstructed viewing of the historic residence from 19th Street. The pilasters may remain as is. The fencing shall be constructed prior to commencement of the gift shop use on the property. 2) Sidewalk shall be constructed and street trees provided on the Hamilton Street frontage within five years. 3) One driveway on 19th Street shall be assigned as an "Entrance Only" and the other as an "Exit Only" prior to commencement of the gift shop use on the property. 4) Street trees shall be installed on 19th Street in accordance with the 19th Street Master Plan within one-year. 5) The street improvement plans for 19th and Hamilton Streets shall be revised as approved by the City Engineer. A lien agreement shall be executed and recorded to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of public improvements at the times stated. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 92-08 - LA PARRY April 8, 1992 Page 5 6) Prior to any work being performed in the public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's office. 5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF APRIL 1992. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA BY: Larry T. McNiei, Chairman ATTEST: Brad 8uller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of April 1992, by the following vote-to-wit: AYESz COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: CI~ OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 8, 1992 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Tom Grahn, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 14459 - L.A. CHANCO - A residential subdivision of 37 single family lots on 8-3 acres of land in the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located at the southeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Lemon Avenue - APN: 201-252-04, 40, 41, and 49. BACKGROUND: On March 28, 1990, the Planning Commission approved Tentative Tract 14459, a total residential development package, to expire on March 28, 1992. The applicant is currently requesting a one- year time extension to expire on March 28, 1993. Provisions of the Development Code allow for time extensions in twelve-month increments, not to exceed five years from the original date of approval. The applicant may request two additional time extensions to extend the tentative map until March 28, 1995. The project successfully completed the plan check process; however, building permits were never pulled and the plan check will expire in May of 1992 unless extended by the Building Official. ANALYSIS: Staff reviewed the proposed time extension request and compared the proposal with development criteria outlined in the Development Code- Based upon this review, staff determined that the project meets all of the basic development standards of the Low-Medium Residential District. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The Planning Commission must make the following findings before approving this application: A. There have been no significant changes in the Land Use Element of the General Plan, the Development Code, or the character of the area within which the project is located that would cause the approved project to become inconsistent or non-conforming; and B. The granting of an extension will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. ITeM C PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TE FOR TT 14459 - L.A. CHANCO April 8, 1992 Page 2 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Time Extension for Tentative Tract 14459 through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval · Respec y su ~d, 11 er City Planner BB: TG/j fs Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Letter from Applicant Exhibit "B" - Tentative Tract Map Exhibit "C" - Conceptual Grading Plan Exhibit "D" - Existing Natural Features Exhibit "E" - Elevations Exhibit "F" - Floor Plans Exhibit "G" - Site Utilization Map Resolution No. 90-40 Resolution No- 90-41 Resolution of Approval INCORPORATED ~ebruar~ ~0 199~ ~jv E,~ ~' :I~i~o CUCAMDNGA · PLAteN lAG DIVI~tON Planning Department CI~ O~ ~CRO C~C~MO~G~ 10500 Civic Ce~te~ D~i~e ~a~cho C~ca~onga~ C~ gl?30 ~: ~.xtensio~ to ~ 14~5g Dea~ ~om: .. O~ ~a~ch ~B, 199~ the abo~e mentioned ~ ~ill expire. ~his lette~ ser~es to ~e~est an extension to the Prese~tl~ ~e ~re in the p~ocess o~ obtaining const~ction ~inanci~g ~or the project. ~e a~ticipate to ha~e this £in- ancing b~ mid-s~mme~ and ~ill commence ~ith the construction then. ~e ~ill ~ecord the £inal map a~d post all bonds ~eq~ired as soon as ~e ha~e the ~inal approval ~rom the le~der. I~ ~ou ha~e an~ 4~estions o~ need additional i~o~mation, please do not hesitate to call me. I ~ill be expecting to hear ~rom ~o~ ~ith a date on the Planning Commissio~ ~genda. st r gar s, R°ta C Salazar p anager E closed: Check RCS/amu cc: Steven Chan Aileen Chan-General Partner 22632 Golden Springs Rd,, Suite 350, Diamond Bar, CA 91765 TEL. (714) 861-1507 FAX (714) 860-3781 CITY OF RANCHO-.CUCAMONGA PLANNING DIVISION ~cno~ cuc~or~,~'~<'~"" _,ITY. OF PLANNING DMSION TITLE: ~.t/¥7!,~,'\ N "- EXHIBIT: .~,/ SCALE: Crwl,) Tent. Tract 14459 · ,.: ': - .... " FIBJet iTI~I)-) (T~t-) Framed - .-~--'-~-~':-' -Tent. Tract 14459 ~.~. . ....: L.A. CHANCO, INC. ~ ,,!,; r. """ :~-'.~-:~i::;~, Tent. Tract 14459 ~:::...-...~:.:...'...:~:~:~~- ~~~ ~~~~ ' ' ' !zlede~ Fieelm ~ ., ~ Ileellv. lesm .. G J · / # Tent. Tract 14459 · ONI 'O,.~NVHO 'V"'I"' RESOLUTION NO. 90-40 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCNO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 14459 AND RELATED TREE REMOVAL PERMIT 88-63, A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF 37 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS ON 8.3 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND LEMON AVENUE IN THE LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 201-251-3, 4, 40 AND 41 A. Recitals. (i) L.A. Chanco has filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 14459 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the-application." (ii) On the 28th of March, 1990, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced ~public hearing on March 28, 1990, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at the southeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Lemon Avenue, with a lot depth of 783 feet as measured from Lemon Avenue, and lot depth of 566 feet as measured from Archibald Avenue; and, (b) The project site contains one (1) barn located in the northwest portion of the tract; and, (c) The property to the north, west and south of the subject site contains single family homes and the property to the east is vacant; and, (d) The subdivision contemplates the development of 37 lots averaging 7,290 square feet in size. ~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 90-40 TT 14459 & TREE REMOVAL PERMIT 88-63 - L.A. CHANCO March 28, 1990 Page 2 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; and (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; and (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; and (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; and (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; and (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Division (1) Prior to the recordation of the final map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes first, the applicant shall consent to, or participate in, the establishment of a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District pertaining to the project site to provide, in conjunction with the applicable School District, for the construction and maintenance of necessary school facilities. However, if any School District has previously established PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 90-40 TT 14459 & TREE REMOVAL PERMIT 88-63 - L.A. CHANCO March 28, 1990 Page 3 such a Community Facilities District, the applicant shall, in the alternative, consent to the annexation of the project site into the territory of such existing District prior to the recordation of the final map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes first. Further, if the affected School District has not formed a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District within twelve (12) months of the date of approval of the project and prior to the recordation of the final map or issuance of building permits for said project, this condition shall be deemed null and void. {2) The barn located on the project site is scheduled for review by the H i stori c Preservation Commission on April 5, 1990, to evaluate the barn's historic significance. Mitigation measures, if any, will be established at that meeting. Prior to the recordation of the final map and the issuance of building permits, all mitigation measures established by the Historic Preservation Commi ssi on wi 11 need to be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. If the Historic Preservation Commission determines the barn to be historically significant and said determi nati on causes change to the tentative map, the applicant shall process a modi fi ed tentative map pri or to the recordation of the final tract map. (3) Revise the grade difference between Lots 17 and 18 to remove the retaining wall along the side property line. The finish elevation of the two lots shall be similar, as driveway hammerhead-turn-around areas are located in a manner that may cause conflicts if a grade difference exists. {4) The Coast Live Oak {Quercus agrifol ia} located on Lot 35 shall be preserved-in-place. {5} The Canary Date Palm {Phoenix canariensis} located on Lot 6 shall either be preserved-in- place or relocated within the project site. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 90-40 TT 14459 & TREE REMOVAL PERMIT 88-63 - L.A. CHANCO March 28, 1990 Page 4 (6) Both the Coast Live Oak and the Canary Date Palm are designated "Heritage Trees" by the Tree Preservati on Ordinance. As such, specific care shall be taken during all phases of constructi on to ensure that no damage occurs to the trees. All construction shall preserve and protect the health of the trees to remain in accordance with the following measures: (a) All trees to be saved shall be enclosed by an appropri ate construction barrier, such as chain link fence or other means acceptable to the City Planner, prior to the issuance of any grading or building permit and pri or to commencement of '- work. Fences are to remain i n pl ace during all phases of construction and may not be removed without the written consent of the City Planner until construction is complete; and, (b) No substantial disruption or removal of the structural or absorptive roots of any tree shall be performed; and, (c) No fill material shall be placed within 3 feet from the outer trunk circumference of any tree; and, (d) No fill materials shall be placed within the drip line of any tree in excess of 18 inches i n depth. This i s a gui deli ne and is subject to modification to meet the needs of i ndi vi dual tree species as determined by an arborist or landscape archi tect; and, (e) No substantial compaction of the soil within the drip line of any tree shall be undertaken; and, (f) No construction, including structures and wall s, that disrupts the root system shall be permitted. As a guideline, no cutting of roots should occur within a distance equal to 3 1/2 times the trunk diameter, as measured at ground level. Actual setback may vary to meet the needs PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 90-40 TT 14459 & TREE REMOVAL PERMIT 88-63 - L.A. CHANCO March 28, 1990 Page 5 of individual tree species as determined by an arborist or landscape architect. Where some root removal is necessary, the tree crown may requi re thi nni ng to prevent wind damage. (7) Tree Removal Permit No. 88-63 is approved subject to the replacement requirements of the Tree preservation Ordinance. Replacement trees, Spotted Gum Eucalyptus ( Eucalyptus maculata) minimum 15-gallon size, spaced 8 feet on center shal I be pl anted i n the landscape setback along Lemon Avenue and shall be shown on the Landscape Plan subject to City Planner's review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. The wall design along Lemon Avenue shall be designed compatible with existing walls on the north side of Lemon Avenue and proposed walls to the east. The design of the wall shall be subject to City Planner's review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. Material samples shall be submitted prior to the issuance of building permits. (9~ The wall design along Archibald Avenue shall ' be designed compati bl e with the exi sting wal 1 located on the east side of Archibald Avenue south of the project site. The design of the wall shall be subject to City Planner's review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. Material samples shall be submitted pri or to the issuance of bui 1 ding permits. (10) All walls shall be constructed of solid masonry and shal 1 be provided with a decorative cap. Combination retaining and freestandi ng wal 1 s 1 ocated adjacent to existing walls shall be provided with a cap to prevent debris, etc., from being . placed between the wall s. (11) Side yard return walls shall be constructed of solid masonry and shall be designed with a fi ni sh consistent with the house design subject to City Planner's review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 90-40 TT 14459 & TREE REMOVAL PERMIT 88-63 - L.A. CHANCO March 28, 1990 Page 6 Engineering Division (1) Overhead Utilities {a) Archibald Avenue - The existing overhead utilities (telecommunication and electrical} on the project side of Archibald Avenue shall be undergrounded from the first pole north of the north project boundary to the first pole south of the south project boundary {including the out parcel), prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the City adopted cost '- for undergrounding from future development (redevelopment) as it occurs on the opposite side of the street. (b) Lemon Avenue - An in-lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (electrical and telecommunication) on the opposite side of Lemon Avenue shall be paid to the City prior to the approval of the Final Map. The fee shall be one-half the City adopted unit amount times the length from the center of London Avenue to the west tract boundary. (2} The landscape design for Archibald Avenue shall be in conformance with the approved Landscape Master Plan for Archibald Avenue. (3) London Avenue shall be constructed full width including street lights on the east side from Lemon Avenue to Via Esperanza. The street trees and sidewalks on the east side shall be deferred until development of the adjacent property. The developer may request an agreement to recover the cost of the improvements east of the centerline upon development of the property to the east. (4} Provide an easement and construct a storm drain pipe from "B" Street southerly and western through Lot 27 to Archibald Avenue and extend southerly within Archibald Avenue to PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 90-40 TT 14459 & TREE REMOVAL PERMIT 88-63 - L.A. CHANCO March 28, 1990 Page 7 join the existing storm drain pipe at Highland Avenue. The design of the storm drain pipe in Archibald Avenue shall be coordinated with the City's Highland Avenue storm drain project. (5) The improvements of Lemon Avenue shall be coordinated with the City' s project to construct the Master Planned Storm Line in Lemon Avenue. The developer shal 1 be responsible for the construction of the Master Planned Storm Drain line in Lemon Avenue from Archibald Avenue to the Lower Alta Loma Channel i f improvements for the Tract are constructed prior to the completion of the project by the City. Standard drainage fees would then be credited to the cost for the '-facility and the developer shall be eligible for reimbursement of cost in excess of the fees in accordance with City Ordinance No. 75. (6) Construct full curb-to-curb width street improvements including street lights from the project site easterly and northerly to Lemon Avenue through Tentative Tract 14011 to provide for secondary access to the project i f not previously constructed by Tract 14011. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover the cost upon development of Tentative Tract 14011. (7) Landscaping shall be provided along the frontage of the "out parcel" located between Lots 6 and 22 on Archibald Avenue. Maintenance of the landscaping shall be the responsibility of the property owner. (B) The sidewalk on Lemon Avenue shall be transitioned from the property line to be located curb adjacent along the frontage of Lots 1, 2, and 3 to provide a minimum width of 6 feet between the exterior tract wall and the sidewalk for the planting of street trees. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 90-40 TT 14459 & TREE REMOVAL PERMIT 88-63 - L.A. CHANCO March 28, 1990 Page 8 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF MARCH, 1990. ATTEST: 'L~ar Y r-Tc i /x/xB~a~~~ Y I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th day of March, 1990, by'the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY, CHITIEA, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY, WEINBERGER NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE .:: .i;i; -'-:- ,i --s-.,a;-..-;'i-i :.-:~.-, = -_. ,:,, ,',-, all ,'!'i ','st , ,= ~ Xi ~-:i ~|-, i.~ =: .it i-;~ ' iiti ,;!:: ~, ,',i, ':, 'h' =" "' :.,.; i ~i i,i x,,, ~-! RESOLUTION NO. 90-41 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW FOR TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 14459, A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF 37 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS ON 8.3-ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND LEMON AVENUE, IN THE LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 201-251-3, 4, 40 AND 41 A. Recitals. (i) L.A. Chanco has filed an application for the Design Review of Tract No. 14459 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter, the subject Design Review request is referred to as "the application." (ii) On'March 28, 1990, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a meeting to consider the application. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. ' NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting on March 28, 1990, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (1) That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and (2) That the proposed design is in accord with the objective of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and {3} That the proposed design is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 90-41 DR FOR TT 14459 - L.A. CHANCO March 28, 1990 Page 2 (4} That the proposed design, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition in the attached Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 4. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF MARCH, 1990. · arr cNi'~l, rma" - n ATTEST: , I ng Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th day of March, 1990, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY, CHITIEA, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY, WEINBERGER NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE C RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 14459, A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED TRACT MAP CONSISTING OF 37 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS, AND DESIGN REVIEW THEREOF, ON 8.3 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND LEMON AVENUE IN THE LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 201-252-04, 40, 41, AND 49. A. Recitals (i) L.A. Chanco has filed an application for the extension of Tentative Tract No. 14459 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Time Extension request is referred to as "the application.." (ii) On March 28, 1990, this Commission adopted its Resolutions No. 90-40 and 90-41, thereby approving, subject to specific conditions and time limits, Tentative Tract No. 14459 and design review thereof. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. That prevailing economic conditions have caused a distressed market climate for development of the project. b. That current economic, marketing, and inventory conditions make it unreasonable to develop the project at this time. c. That strict enforcement of the conditions of approval regarding expirations would not be consistent with the intent of the Development Code. d. That the granting of said time extension will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TE FOR TT 14459 - L.A. CHANCO April 8, 1992 Page 2 3. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs I and 2 above, this Commission hereby grants a Time Extension for: Tract , Applicant Expiration Tract 14459 L.A. Chanco March 28, 1993 Design Review L.A. Chanco March 28, 1993 for Tract 14459 4. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution- APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF APRIL 1992. PLANNING COMMISSION OF 'THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Bullet, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of April 1992, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA S TA F F R E P O R T DATE: April 8, 1992 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Con~nission FROM: Barrye R. Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer BY: Barbara Krall, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 13987- LEWIS DEVELOPMENT 'CO~tPANY - Th~ creation of a single'i'.31 acre pardel for the development of a gas station, mini-market, and car wash in the Medium Residential designation (8-14 dwelling units per acre) of the Terra Vista Planned Community, located at the southwest corner of Base Line.. Road and Rochester Avenue - APN: 227-151-17. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. Related file: Conditional Use Permit 91-20. Continued from January 8, 1992) BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: Parcel Map 13987 was continued for an indefinite time period at th~ January 8, 1992 meeting to allow the developer time to appeal the Planning Commission decision dening CUP 91-20, the proposed development of a gas station, mini market and car wash for the site. The City Council granted the developer's appeal at the March 4, 1992~meeting, so the developer now wishes to proceed with the Parcel Map. The issues noted in the attached December 11, 1991 staff report remain the same. They were discussed at the Planning Commission meeting of December 17, 1991 (see attached minutes). The City Council did not discuss these issues with the appeal of CUP 91-20 because they were not specified as part of the appeal. The developer will most probably appeal them to the City Council. Respectful 1 y submitted, Barrye R. Hanson St. Civil Engineer BRH:BH:dl w Attachments: Staff Report Planning Commission Minutes from December 17, 1992 Resolution of Approval ITS4 D CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ;~ STAFF REPORT DATE: December 11, 1991 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Barrye R. Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer BY: Barbara Kral 1, Assi stant Engineer SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 13987- LEWIS DEVELOPMENT CO~ANY - The creation of a single 1.31 acre parcel for the development of a gas station, mini-market, and car wash in the ~dium Residential designation (8-14 dwelling units per acre) of the Terra Vista Planned Conmnunity, located at the southwest corner of Base Line Road and Rochester Avenue - APN: 227-151-17. Staff recommends '-issuance of a Negative Declaration. Related file: Conditional Use Permit 91-20. Continued from October 9,-1991) I. PR(XIECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Re uested: Approval of the proposed Tentative Parcel Map as shown on ~xhibit "B" B. Parcel Size: 1.31 acres C. Exi sting Zoning: Medium DensitY (4-14 du/ac) District of the Terra Vista Community P1 an D. Surrounding Land Use: North - Single Family Under Construction South - Vacant East - Existing Single Family West - Vacant E. ~General P1 an and Devel ~ent Code Desi~: North - Medium (4-14 du/ac) Density, Victoria Planned Community South -Low medium (4-8 du/ac) District, Terra Vista Planned CommunitY East - Low (2-4 du/ac) District West - Low Medium (4-8 du/ac) District, Terra Vista P1 anned Coam~unitY PLANNING COMMISSION: 7F REPORT TENT PM 13987 - LEWIS DEVELOPMENT CO December 11, 1991 Page 2 F. Site Characteristics: The site is vacant and slopes gently from north to south. II. ANALYSIS: The purpose of this Parcel Map is to create a single parcel for the development of a gas station, mini-market and car wash. Approval of the Tentative Parcel Map is dependent upon approval of CUP 91-20 which is al so on tonight's agenda. Both the CUP and the Parcel Map were discussed at the Planning Commission meeting of October g, 1991. As a result of the discussion, the developer has expanded the site southerly to incorporate the driveway and landscape areas within the'gas station parcel. There are two other issues remai ni ng: 1. Offsite Rochester Avenue Street Improvements - Staff is requiring that the project construct the west half 'of Rochester Avenue from Base Line Road to Church Street (the east half exists). This requirement is consistent with the attached Terra Vista Planned Conmnunity Street Improvement Implementation Pol icy, which was approved by the City Council on September 6, 1989. Because the policy was approved by the City Council, the Planning C~mnission can not modify its requirements. However you can recommend exceptions to the Council for their consideration if the applicant appeal s the requirement. The applicant asserts that the policy was intented for larger projects and not a small gas station site. Staff does not recall any discussion about limiting improvement requirements based upon small project size during the formulation and approval of the pol icy. 2. Offsite Storm Drain Im rovements - Similar to the preceding issue, staff "is requiring t~at the project install off-site drainage improvements in accordance with Tetra Vista Planned Community Drainage Improvement Implementation Policy (copy attached) which was al so approved by the City Council on September 6, 1989. III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The applicant completed Part I of the Initial Study. Staff conducted a field investigation and completed Part II of the Ini ti al Study. No adverse impacts upon the environment are anticipated as a result of this project. Therefore, issuance of Negative Declaration is appropriate. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: Notices of Public Hearing have been sent to surrounding ro ~rty~owners and p. laced in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin. Posting been comp ere . te a so PLANNING COMMISSION · FF REPORT TENT PM 13987 - LEWIS DEVELOPMENT CO December 11, 1991 Page 3 V. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the P1 anning Commission consider all input an,8"'elements of the Tentative Parcel Map 13987 and related file CUP 91-20. If after such consideration, the Commission can recommend approval, then the adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. Respectfully submitted, Barrye . Hanson Senior Civil Engineer BRH:BK:dl w Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Vicinity Map Exhibit "B" - Tentative Map Exhibit "C" - Site P1 an Street Improvement Implementation Pol icy Drainage Improvement Implementation Policy Applicant's Letter Resolution and Conditions of Approval N CITY OF rrns: RANCHO CUCAMONGA 'rrrng: v It. IN. IT' Y M,RP IS N CITY OF ETD~: p/~t s [ M,RP 13~ a 7 RANCHO CUC~0NGA ~ c ITE PLRN CITY OF RAMCHO C~ TERRA VISTA PLAI~ COWleNITY STREET IFFROVEFIEIIT IIIq,~ATIOM POLICY Projects within Tetra Vista shall be required to construct street improvements as follows: A. Streets adjacent to projects shall be constructed full width to include curb on the opposite sides. B. Streets shall be extended (full width) off-site far enough to provide two means of access. C. Projects within the individual Development Areas shown on the map below shall construct the specific street segments designated as follows: AREA STREET SEG!qENT I Foothill - Haven to Spruce and Haven - Foothill to Town Center 2 Foothill - Haven to Nilliken 3 Foothi 11 - Haven to Rochester ' 4 Rochester - Foothi 11 to Pop1 ar 5 Rochester'-- Foothill to Church 6 Rochester - Church to Base Line 7 Base Line - Nilliken to Rochester 8 Base Line - Nilliken to Mountain View 9 Same as adjacent area depending upon where access is taken. 10 Nilliken - Foothill to Base Line 11 Spruce - Foothill to Elm 12 Host of this area is already condttioned or developed. 13 Haven - Church to Base Line Note: Projects that cross area boundaries (at corners in particular) shall construct all segments required for each affected area. LEGEND ~ Area Boundary i Area Nmmber 1" - 2000' cc1 CITY (,. ACHO CUCAMONGA - ENGINEERING ,SION TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT IMPLEMENTATION POLICY Projects within the individual Development Areas shown on the map below shall construct the specific drainage facilities designated as follows: AREA FACILITY 1 Portions of Master Plan System 3 and 4 from the site to Deer Creek Channel. 2 Portions of Master Plan System 1 and 2 from the site to Deer Creek Channel. 3 Portions of Master Plan System 1, 2 and 5 from the site to Deer Creek Channel including adequate retention facilities. 4 Same as Area 3, except no development approvals until park basin sizing resolved. 5 Same as Area 3. 6 Portions of Master Plan System 6 from the site to Day Creek Channel. If prior to completion of Day Creek Channel Phase III, provide one retention facility for the entire area. 7 Same as Area 6. Use Area 6 retention facility increased to accomodate all of Area 7. Note: 1. All development shall provide protection from upstream drainage. 2. Offsite street extensions may be exempt from this policy as approved by the City Engineer. LEGEND m Area Boundary t Area Nmnber 1" ' 2000' Lewis Homes Management Corp. 1156 North MotmtaLn Argue / P.O. Box 670 / Upltnd, C~lLfornia 91785-0670 714/985-0971 FAX: 714/949-6700 July 18, 1991 , Mr. Wm. Joe O'Neil City Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Re: Proposed Shell Station - Base Line and Rochester Offsite Improvements Dear Joe: ... Recently we were ~nformed by Shell that the Conditions of Approval for its proposed service station include significant offsite improvements. An investigation revealed that the basis for those conditions is the Tetra Vista Street and Drainage Improvement Implementation Policy adopted in September, 1989 (i.e., the "Policy")- On .July 10, 1991, we met with staff and the Shell representative, Ms. Kathy Lucien, to discuss the intent of the Policy and address its application to a one-acre commercial project. Staffs' initial reaction was that the Policy should be applied to any development- We disagree and request that the City consider the original intent and objective of the Policy, i. e., to provide necessary traffic and drainage mitigation in the context of large residential developments- Those considerations do not apply to this one-acre commercial development: 1. ~ Staff has acknowledged that the drainage impact associated with this development is not of the magnitude that was contemplated by the Policy. We understand and agree that there are minor drainage considerations which will be addressed. However, the installation of the entire storm drain system from Base Line to Foothill or the development of a retention facility to accommodate hundreds of acres is not appropriate. 2. Street ImDrovements~ We understand the intent of the Policy. SpecificallY, we note that the line between Area #6 and Area #7 (see attached graphic) was drawn so that a ,,Project" at the corner of Base Line and Rochester Mr. Wm. Joe O'Neil July 18, 1991 Page 2 would trigger the construction of appropriate segments for bot_ h areas. However, we submit that the Policy was established with a large residential project in mind. This is evidenced by the underlying land use designation (i.e., "M" (medium-density)) shown on the graphic. The possibility of a one-acre gas station development--with no significant traffic impact on the Area #6 segment of Rochester Avenue--was not contemplated. Consequently, we request that the site be considered to be within Area #7, (see attached graphic) which requires the completion of all Base Line Road Improvements; provided that appropriate improvements, including transitions, would be made at the adjacent Rochester frontage. Perhaps a favorable administrative interpretation of the Policy would suffice for both the drainage and street improvement issues. Staff indicated that the street improvement issue would be more problematic in this regard. Therefore, we respectfully request a review by City Council of the proposed modifications to the Policy- We defer to you to ' identify the scope of that review. We sincerely appreciate your assistance- Very truly yours, Vice president Senior Project Manager JMO:ksk cc: Ms. Kathy Lucien, Shell Oil Company Rick Mager, Lewis Homes Ken Corhan, Lewis Homes Don Thompson, Lewis Homes Mike Lasley, Lewis Homes an McNiel objected to limiting the hours of operation because he felt ' would re~triction of life style. Motion: Moved by her, seconded by Tolstoy, to direct f to prepare a resolution of approval appropriate conditions he January 8, 1992, Planning Commission Meeting. 'on carried by oilowing vote= -AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MCNIEL, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT= CO Chai ENVIR~N3d~wTmTL p~mmSS)~MT AaJ~. TRNTATIVB p~u~mv..- ~km 13987 - LEWIS DF~KLOPMBNT COMPANT - The creation of a single 1.31 acre parcel for the Development of a gas station, mini-market, end cRz wash in the Medium Residential designation (8-14 dwelling units per acre) of the Tetra Vista Planned Community, located at the southwest corner of Base Line Road and Rochester Avenue - APN: 227-151-17. Staff recoasnends £seuance of a' Negative Declaration. Related filet Conditional Use Permit 91-20. (Continued from October 9, 1991) Scott Murphy, Associate Planner, stated that staff recommended that the item be continued to January 8, 1992, to peaL= the Coasnission to handle it concurrently with Conditional Use Permit 91-20. Chairman McNiel opened the public hearing. Rick Mager, Lewis Has, 1156 North Mountain Avenue, Upland, discussed the condition requiring the extension of all off-site improvements along Rochester from the interse~lon of Base Line Road down to Church. He thought that placed an excessive burden on-the project end asked that the site be viewed in connection with future residential development in Planning Area 7. He felt the impact of I one-acre development at the corner will have negligible drainage effects and the off-site drainage improvements of Rochester could be deferred excep~ that the Tetra Vista Planned Coaununity Street Improvement and Drainage Improvement Implementation Policies adopted in September 1989 require that any development at the corner would trigger the ex~enlion of the off-site improvements down to Church. He asked that the applicant be permitted to deal with engineering s~aff to solve any potential problems that there could be as they relate to the one-acre parcel development and defer the complete off-site improvements. Chairman McNlel requested that Engineering consider Mr. Mager's con~nents and consider not only potential drainage problems but also safety with respect no how the road would widen or narrow coming off the service station proper~y. Planning Commission Minutes -34- December 17, 1991 BarzTe Hanson'[ Senior Civil Engineer, stated that staff had already considered the applicant° s position. Commissioner Melcher stated that the two policies were adol=~ed at the City Council level and he did not feel it would be within the Planning Commission°s purview =o make modifications although the Commission may make recommendations to the Council. He said he was the developer's representative at the time the Street Improvement Implementation Policy was adol~ced. He r&called that the policy was advanced by the City Engineer because of the City'l experience in dealing with the developer at that time with piecemeal development in the area and the intent was to get the improvements completed in an intelligent fashion on · larger scale basis. He did not believe It was the intent, nor did he believe it appropriate, to place the burden on the service station. N~ti~ Moved by Melcher, seconded by TolstOy, to continue Environmental Assessment and Tentative Parcel Map 13987 to Januaz7 8, 1992. Motion carried by the following votes AYES: COMMISSIONERSx MCNIEL, MELCHER, TOLSTOY -. NOES z COMMISSIONERS s CHITlEA, .VALLETT~ ABSENT z COMMISSIONERS s NONE -carried - The development of three i~ustrial buildings 0 square feet on 27.5 acres of land within the Minimum Heav~ Dlstric~ (Sub·re· 9) of the Indus~rial area Plan, located at the intersection of Millikan and Jersey Boulevard - z 229-111-31, 32, 33, 48, ~ 49 .elf recomnds issuance of a Declaration- Scott Murphy, Associate r, presented the report. Chairman McNlel invited public James Weetlin~, O'Donnell 2201 Dupont Drive, t100, Irv£ne, stated they were willing to all of conditions exce~ for Condition 5. He requested that t not be delete the most westerly driveway on the north of Jersey Boulevard. said when they combined the lots to building, they designed in driveway for ease of access trucking traffic. Be requested the condition be modified to' o~ the developer to work wi~h staff on details. He su the railroad crossing median so that would not east on Jersey and trying to ~ake a left the ,. He maid that would still allow vehicles to turn right He presented a sketch!of the proposedmedian layout. Planning Commission Minutes -35- December 17, 1991 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NUMBER 13987, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD AND ROCHESTER AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227-151-17 WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 13987, submitted by Lewis Development Company, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing into 1 parcel, the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, identified as APN(s) 227-151-17, located at the southwest corner of Base Line Road and Rochester Avenue; and WHEREAS, on December ll, and continued to December 17, 1991, January 8, 1992, and April 8, 1992, the Planning Commission held duly advertised public hearings for the above-described map. NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCANONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the following findings have been made: 1. That the map is consistent with the General Plan- 2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan. 3.That the site is physically suitable for the proposed development- 4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage or public health problems or have adverse effects on abutting properties. SECTION 2: This Commission finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970; and further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration- SECTION_ T_ 3: Tentative Parcel Map Number 13987 is hereby approved subject to the attached Standard Conditions and the following Special Conditions: 1. Overhead Utilities a. Base Line Road - An in-lieu fee as a contribution to the previously undergrounded utilities (electrical and telecommunication) on the opposite side of Base Line shall be paid to PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TENT. P.M. 13987 - LEWIS DEV. CO. April 8, 1992 Page 2 the City prior to issuance of building permits or final map approval, whichever occurs first. The fee shall be one-half the City adopted unit amount times the length from the center of Rochester Avenue to the west project boundary. b. Rochester Avenue - An in-lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of existing overhead utilities (electrical and telecommunication, except for 66 K.V. electrical) on the opposite side of Rochester Avenue shall be paid to the City prior to issuance of a building permit or final map approval, whichever occurs first. The fee shall be one-half the City adopted unit amount times the ~ength from the center of Base Line Road to the south project boundary- 2. Acquire necessary right-of-way and construct Rochester Avenue full width from Base Line Road to Church Street. Offsite sidewalk and street trees may be deferred until the development of the adjacent properties. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover the cost of constructing offsite street improvements from future development as it occurs. 3. Remove and replace portion of the curb and gutter on Base Line Road to construct a right turn lane for the project driveway. 4. Construct a combination bus bay and right turn lane on Rochester Avenue north of the project driveway. 5. Construct the portion of the Terra Vista Community Master Planned Storm Drain System #6 (lines 6 and 6-1) from this site to Day Creek Channel- If the project is to be constructed prior to the completion of the Day Creek Channel, provide a retention facility to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 6. The Terra Vista Community entry monument, if constructed, shall be maintained by the developer. 7- Install the Base Line Road median landscaping from Milliken Avenue to Rochester Avenue. 8. Final Parcel Map lot lines shall conform to the approved site plan. pLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TENT. P.M. 13987 - LEWIS DEV. CO. April 8, 1992 Page 3 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF APRIL 1992. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced,-passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of April 1992, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA /~"'~'~-; STAFF REPORT DATE: April 8, 1992 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Anna-Lisa Hernandez, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 91-03 - JAMES PAGE - A request to modify the hours of operation and to expand the permitted uses within an existing 103,522 square foot indoor wholesale/retail commercial use located within the General Industrial District (Subarea 11 ) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan at 11530 Sixth Street - APN: 229-262-28. (Continued from March 25, 1992. ) Addendure S~_R~f Report for Conditional Use Permit 91-03 (Carnival Malls ). ABSTRACT: The applicant has submitted two letters (see Exhibits "A" & "B"), which provide new information addressing the March 25, 1992, staff report regarding parking, security, and business licensing issues. The applicant has also requested that the Planning Commission consider the additional use of an outdoor swap meet use within the project site to be permitted in conjunction with a Temporary Use Permit. ANALYSIS: A. Expansion of Permitted Uses: In addition to those items identified within the March 25, 1992, staff report, the applicant is also requesting that jewelry repair services be permitted within the Carnival Malls project. Staff Comments: Retail sales of jewelry and watches is allowed under the Indoor Wholesale/Retail Commercial use category- The jewelry repair service could be listed under the Convenience Sales and Service category within the Industrial Area Specific Plan- Convenience Sales and Services are permitted within the subarea, with an approved Conditional Use Permit from the Planning Commission. The use will not adversely impact the existing or future uses within the project, as it will be ancillary to the primary use of retail sales- Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the applicant's request to permit the jewelry repair service within the Carnival Mall project site- IT~4E PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MOD. TO CUP 91-03 - JAMES PAGE April 8, 1992 Page 2 B. Extension of Hours of Operation During Holidays: No new information has been submitted by the applicant. Staff's recommendation is unchanged. C- Expanded Hours of Operation on Fridays: The applicant has requested to expand the hours of operation on Fridays from 10 a-m- to 8 p-m- Staff Comments: Originally, staff based its recommendation on inaccurate information discussed within the shared parking study submitted by the applicant. The Development Code parking requirement for the Indoor Wholesale/Retail Commercial use is 1 space per 100 square feet. Alternatively, as part of the Conditional Use Permit review, the Planning Commission may allow 1 space per 150 square feet subject to the submittal and review of a parking study. The shared parking study indicates that a total of 691 spaces will be necessary for all uses operating at the same time on weekdays. This figure is based on the typical demand within similar centers and includes a 10 percent buffer. This figure also assumes that a majority of the uses do not operate at their peak demands at the same time. A total of 760 parkin~ stalls have been provided. Therefore, there are enough parking spaces for all existing and future tenants within the center, as determined within the shared parking study. Operation of the facility during weekdays would not negatively impact other users. Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the shared parking concept for the project, and allow the applicant to operate on Fridays. D. Other Issues: In the previous review, staff noted issues relating to business licensing and security for the Carnival Malls site. The applicant has contacted licensing staff and is working diligently to rectify those issues- The applicant clarified that they have security personnel and are in compliance with this requirement. Conditions had been placed in the previous staff report and on the resolutions to ensure continued compliance- In raising these issues, staff felt that the Planning Commission, in its review of the expansion of the proposed hours of operation, should be aware of these concerns. E. Use Determination: On March 26, 1992, staff received another letter from the applicant (see Exhibit "A") requesting that we consider locating the existing General Dynamics weekend swap meet (an outdoor swap meet use) within the Carnival Malls site. The General Dynamics property is currently for sale and the operators of the outdoor electronics swap meet are seeking an alternative site for their use. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MOD. TO CUP 91-03 - JAMES PAGE April 8, 1992 Page 3 The applicant has requested that the Planning Commission permit the applicant to conduct the proposed indoor/outdoor swap meet use on a trial basis through the Temporary Use Permit process. The applicant is requesting that the outdoor portion of the use be permitted to operate one Saturday a month. Staff Comments: Currently, the outdoor swap meet use is permitted only within the Heavy Industrial zone, Subarea 15, of the Industrial Area Specific Plan. Allowing this use on a regular basis within the site would require a Land Use Amendment to the Industrial Area Specific Plan and another modification to the original Conditional Use Permit- A Temporary Use Permit serves to control and regulate land use activities of a temporary nature which might negatively effect the public health, safety, and welfare for uses such as parking lot/sidewalk sales, christmas tree lots, etc- These events are limited to three times annually, not to exceed a maximum of 3 consecutive days per event within each center (see Exhibit "C"). Staff cannot support the proposed Temporary Use Permit on a monthly basis for the following reasons: 1. The Development Code allows each site a maximum of three Temporary Use Permits to be issued per site, annually. The applicant is requesting that these outdoor swap meets occur on a regular monthly basis. 2- Outdoor swap meets are not permitted within General Industrial zones, 3. The Industrial Area Specific Plan clearly states that all businesses are to be conducted within an enclosed building (see Exhibit "D"). Staff has numerous concerns in combining an indoor/outdoor swap meet use within a General Industrial site. There may be cumulative impacts which might negatively affect other site users- Aesthetics, parking, business licensing, and site maintenance are just a few potential problems. Although the applicant is requesting a trial basis of the indoor/outdoor swap meet use, staff feels that a one- time occurrence may not be sufficient enough to predict all the cumulative impacts, particularly since the site is not fully leased or developed. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised in the Inland Valle~ Daily Bulletin as a public hearing, the project site was posted, and notices were sent to all properties within 300 feet of the project site. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MOD. TO CUP 91-03 - JAMES PAGE April 8, 1992 Page 4 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Parts A, B, and C, with modifications through adoption of the attached Resolutions ( separate Resolutions are provided for your convenience ) · If the Planning Commission cannot support any of the proposed modifications, then staff should be directed to prepare Resolutions of Denial for adoption on your next consent calendar agenda. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission determine that the proposed monthly outdoor electronic swap meet is a prohibited use for Subarea 11 through adoption of the attached Resolution- Respe ~ ler City Planner BB: ALH/j fs Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Applicant 's Letter dated March 25, 1992 Exhibit "B" - Applicant's Letter dated March 27, 1992 Exhibit "C" - Temporary Use Permit Requirements Exhibit "D" - Industrial Area Specific Plan "Condition of Uses" Exhibit "E" -Staff Report dated March 25, 1992 Resolution of Approval for Expansion of Uses Resolution of Approval for Expansion of Hours to Include Holidays Resolution of Approval for Expansion of Hours to Include F ri days Resolution of Denial for Outdoor Swap Meet Use -- -D -- CITY OF P~ ',,~HR CUC~n~GA Mr. Brad Bul ler, Director Planning Department City of Rancho Cucamonga Rancho Cucamonga, California 917~U Dear Mr. Bullet: Westicor Incorp on behalf of CARNIVAL INDOOR STREET FAIRE is applying to the Planning Department of t~e City of Rancno Cucamon~a ~or a clarification of some present conditions of its CUP for t~e Facilities located at llb~O SIXTH STREET. During this process, the operators of the GENERAL DYNAMICS NON-PROFIT SWAPMEET approached us with a request to save their operation. we are requesting under conditions 12 & 13 of our EXISTING CUP that we be allowed to apply ~or and receive a TEMPORARY CONDITIONAL USE PER/4IT for the PROMOTIONAL OUTDOOR SALE on behalf of the G. D. NON-PROFIT HAM CLUB. This operation as required under condition 1z would be operated by CARNIVAL INDOOR STREET FAIRE. The purpose of t~is request is so t~at we may ORDERLY APPLY for a CUP to incorporate and SAVE THIS NON-PROFIT CLUB'S FACILITY for the CITY of RANCHO CUCAMONGA. Cities Planning and Approval process, at best, is a HOPE by those City Officials that maXe t~eir determinations t~at WHAT THEY 'PERCEIVE to be REALITY" is, in fact REALITY"! How often do pictures, plans and exhibits FALL FAR SHORT of REALITY. with the approval of our request, HERE FOR THE FIRST TIME, "ALL" CITY OFFICIALS "CAN ACTUALLY SEE', t~e CONDITIONS THAT WILL OCCUR "PRIOR to APPROVAL". W~atever NEGATIVE CONDITIONS t~at can occur, wlli be seen and either medlgated or the pro3ect TURNED DOWN! T~e question is WHY SAVE THE GENERAL DYNAMICS NON-PROFIT SWAPMEET? TDe following Is a brief commentary by Mr. Paul Petty, a commissioner of t~e GD NON-PROFIT HAM CLUB. We will address our comments including detail plans of operation, medigatlon of any negative conditions and t~e benefits to the city In con3unctlon wlt~ our formal cup application. For t~e past SIX (plus) years t~e GD swapmeet has been a tool for Amateur Radio Operators (Hams) to find the wide variety of equipment necessary for t~elr ~obby. As most of the Southland ~as ~eard, General Dynamics ~as placed t~e Rancho Cucamonga property up {or sale. We are concerned about the avallabllty of that property for future swapmeets. We feel t~e need to find a more permanent alternative location and would prefer it to be ~ Rancno cuc.mong. wn.r.w. liv.. No single business is available in the greater L.A. basin which can supply all the equipment needed by Hams. Since Hares install, maintain and repair (even build) their own equipment they nave unique equipment needs. They requlre the use of equipment such as Specturm Analyzers, Frequency Counters, Oscllloscopes, Volt Ohm Amp Meters (VOM's), Field Test Sets, Signal Strength Meters, Standlng Wave Ratio Meters (SWR) and so on. They also require the more mundane equipment such as Antennas, Coaxlal Cable, Soldering Equipment, Batteries, Wire and Computers. Tnls equipment is necessary to maintain their equipment for when it is needed. The Amateur Radio (HAM) community is, by Federal Communications Commission Law, a non-profit group of radio operators which nave repeatedly proven ~nelr worth during disasters. Numbering over 3UU,UOU nationwide, they routinely volunteer tnelr services to augument or replace other services when needed. Ham operators earn their bread and butter in diverse 'professions" and are geographically scattered. Tnls is both a blessing and a problem. Tnelr professions, worldwide, include a U.S. Senator, the King of Jordan, and even Housewiles and Children. Since the HAM community is so diverse and scattered it can count on help from everTwhere. Whether the need is for a specialist or physical labor, the HAM ls available and able to ~elp at all times. This benefit is also a curse. When HAMS want to meet, discuss equipment, purchase equipment or trade equipment, the very diversity which works so well for disaster response prevents close interaction. Also because of their diverse locations, no single business has been devised to serve tnelr needs. The only solution which has worked thus far is the HAM RADIO swapmeet. It affords vendors and buyers a single central location to promote t~elr nobby. we hope the comments by Mr. Petty give you some inslgnt on what and why we are trying to save this facility. By the way they operate (one) Saturday per month from 6:uo AM to ll:UU AM. March zT, ~99z ~q M~ ~ Z~:~ Mr. Brad Buller, City ~lanner Planning Department ~ , ,v;~ ~;U City of Rancno Cucamonga Rancno Cucamonga, California 9173U Dear Mr. Bullet: In the Staff Report dated March 2b, 1992 prepared for the MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 91-03 a number of items need clarification. APPLICANTS REQUESTS: A. Personal Services should also include Jewelry Repair. STAFF COMMENTS: The PARKING STUDY prepared by Austin-Foust had a Typo in the APPENDIX snowing the study as being that of l:lsu when it reality the study was for l:10u. The correct table for your analysis is Table 7, page 12. The information based on that typo was translated into an incorrect assumption snowing a deficit of 85 parking stalls during our pea~ hour. The correct copy of the study, snowing this to be correct has been set by Austln-Foust to the City Planning Department. OUR HOURS OF OPERATION "DO MOT" INCLUDE ANY FRIDAY HOURS OF OPERATION, PRESENTLY, EVEN THOUGH PREVIOUSLY APPROVED. OTHER ISSUES: A. SECURITY. CARNIVAL NAILS 'DID NOT" RELEASE THEIR SECURITY PERSONNEL. What tney did do is to MUTUALLY TERMINATE the CONTRACT with Burns Security. Mr. Bruce Hays who was head of Security for Burns Security was hired as Mall Operations Manager. He is responsible for the hiring and firing of all personnel at Carnival Malls whlC~ includes our own YOUNG staff of Becurlty officers. We have always had, as we do today, ON-SITE SECURITY OFFICERS. NO interruption of that occured even when Burns Security Service ended. The Staff ls entlrely correct in their comments. We have met our obligations as per the CUP Condition; 2- 7 However, it is Just not acceptable to Carnival Malls Management as well as the City. We nave therefore met with the City Licensing Department wlt~ further meetings scheduled next week to Coordinate a more e~ectlve program. It ls our intent to ma~e t~ls program 1oO~ effective and plan to work wlt~ t~e city Licensing Department until that is accomplished. RECOMMENDATION: T~e clarifications mentioned in t~ls letter we believe should materially c~ange your recommendations. we are however, confused by t~e statement w~lch mentioned the possible revocation of our CUP. It is our understanding and agreement that under our original cup ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS could be imposed on our operation If we ignored or were not in compliance wlt~ our CUP conditions. However, since we nave always been in full compliance wlt~ all t~elr conditions, including the SPIRIT of those CONDITIONS, It would appear that a recommendation of possible REVOCATION is a little ~ars~. cerely, ~ JRP/la (f) Outdoor display of merchandise as accessory to current on-site business (subsection G-3 of this Section); (g) Outdoor recreation uses; (h) Parking lot and sidewalk sales (subject to temporary use permit and regulations set forth in this chapter); and (i) Other activities and uses similar to those above as determined by the City Planner. 2. .Parkin{~ lot and sidewalk sales: Parking lot and sidewalk sales may be permitted on private property in the commercial/retail areas of the City, including retail/wholesale busineses located within industrial areas, in connection with current on-site businesses, subject to the approval of a Temporary Use Permit as provided in Section 17.04.070 and the following criteria: ~ Z)~ (a) Each sale is limited to a maximum of three (3) consecutive d · (b) No sale for any single business or any other businesses located on the (a,)~) Each sa~shopping center, shah be permitted within thirty (30) days of another sale; (c) A maximum of three (3) sales shall be permitted for each business ' during each calendar year; however, one (1) additional sale may be permitted for any business located within a shopping center provided that at least fifty percent (50%) of the businesses occupying the lpate concur (d) The applicant for such sale must obtain the written authorization of the property owner and must provide proof of notification at least thirty (30) days prior to proposed sale to aH other businesses on the same lot or parcel, or within the same shopping center, that a parking lot or sidewalk sale will be conducted, the times it will be conducted and that no other sale within thirty (30) days of such sale will be permitted. (e) The items to be sold shah be of the same type that are regularly displayed and sold at the business location; (f) The activity shall not present a hazard to pedestrians or encroach on a required building exit; (g) Safe vehicle ingress and egress shall be provided at all times; and (h) Adequate parking shall be provided and maintained during the course of the activity for both the business of the applicant and all other businesses on the same lot or parcel or within the same shopping center. -107- Revised: 8/16/'3~ A. General Provisions The purpose of standards withi'n General Provisions is to establish minimum standards regulating specific details in the development of any project within the Industrial Area. The standards set forth in this section shall apply either within the entire Industrial )rea or where stained by l;he La~d Use c&te-~aFy.----- Condition of Uses A.1. All business and manufacturing operations shall be conducted within an enclosed building unless specifically permitted and adequately screened from public view pursuant to this Section. Signs A;2 Signs shall be used for the purpose of identification and direction. The design of permitted signs shall be architecturally integrated with the building design. Submittal of preliminary design concepts during the development review process is encouraged. The design of signs including location, materials, colors, copy, size, and construction details are all set forth in the City Sign Ordinance (Chapter 14 of the Municipal Code}. A.3. A coordinated Uniform Sign Program may be required for any development, including wall and monument signs, to encourage design compati bi 1 i ty. Li ghti ng A. 4. Li ghti ng shal 1 be used for the purpose of providing illumination for the security and safety of on-si te areas such as parking, loading, shipping and receiving, pathways, and working areas. The following standards shall apply in all areas. a. The design of 1 i ght fi xtu res and its structural support shall be architecturally compatible with the surrounding buildings. Free standing 1 ight standards shall not exceed 25' or the height of the shortest on- site building. b. Security 1 ighting fixtures are not to project above the fascia or roof line of the building. -' I I 1-25 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 25, 1992 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Anna-Lisa Hernandez, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 91-03 - JAMES PAGE - A request to modify the hours of operation and to expand the permitted uses within an existing 103,522 square foot Indoor Wholesale/Retail Commercial use located within the General Industrial District ( Subarea 11 ) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan at 11530 Sixth Street - APN: 229-262-28. (Continued from February 26, 1992. ) ABSTRACT: This application involves a three-part modification to Conditional Use Permit 91-03 and relates to the operation of the Carnival Malls site. Part A is a request to expand the permitted uses within the site- Part B is a request to expand the permitted hours of operation during holidays. Finally, Part C is a request to expand the hours of operation to include Fridays, in addition to the current weekend operations. These modifications relate to the existing Carnival Malls site, an Indoor Wholesale/Retail Commercial use. Industrial Specific Plan Amendment 91-03, approved by the City Council on July 3, 199 1, conditionally allows the use to locate within Subareas 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, and 15 within the Industrial Area Specific Plan. Conditional Use Permit 91-03 for Carnival Malls was approved by the Planning Commission on June 25, 1991, and the uee began operation in November of 1991. Staff supports the approval of Parts A and B, with minor modifications, as they are consistent with the intent of the Industrial Area Specific Plan- However, Part C, the expansion of the hours of operation on Fridays, cannot be supported by staff as the applicant has failed to comply with the conditions of approval and lacks sufficient parking. This report reviews each request independently and provides the appropriate resolution for each. APPLICANT ' S REQUESTS: A. Expansion of Permitted Uses: The applicant has requested that the following uses be permitted to operate within the Carnival Malls site: travel agencies, mortgage brokers, real estate sales, beauty or nail salons, and photography studios. Photography studios and travel agencies are listed under the Personal Services category. Mortgage brokers and real estate sales are listed under the J="- ] } "e"' PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MODo TO CUP 91-03 - JAMES PAGE March 25, 1992 Page 2 category of Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Services. Finally, beauty salons/nail salons are listed under the category of Convenience Sales and Services. (See Exhibit "F"). Staff Comments: All of the requested use~ are listed under categories that are currently conditionally permitted within Subarea 11, with the approval of the Planning Commission. These uses will not adversely impact the existing or future uses within Carnival Malls or the site. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission conditionally permit the proposed uses, as identified above, to locate within the Carnival Malls. Extension of Hours of Operation During Holidays: The applicant is proposing to extend the existing permitted hours of operation to include, "ALL LEGAL HOLIDAYS, such as, New Year's Day, Valentine's Day, Lincoln's and Washington's Birthday, St. Patrick's Day, Armed Forces Day, Memorial Day, Flag Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Columbus Day, United Nation's Day, Halloween, Veteran's Day, Thanksgiving Day (and the day after), and the week before Christmas." (See Exhibit "C-1.") Staff Comments: A majority of the days that the applicant is proposing to operate are not legal holidays. In general, most industrial and office businesses operate through all of the above identified holidays- However, it can be reasonably argued that most businesses shutdown or reduce operations on Independence Day, Memorial Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. There may be cumulative parking impacts to the existing light industrial users, and future users on the site if the request is granted as proposed. The parking study, submitted by the applicant in June 1991, indicates that there is a deficit of 85 parking stalls with all existing and future site users operating at the same time (see Alternative 3 of the attached Exhibit, "D") on a weekday. Additional impacts that may effect other site users are noise, traffic, and trash. In general, other site users are not negatively impacted by the indoor wholesale/retail commercial use because they maintain typical hours of operation, from 7:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., while the Carnival Malls site currently operates during peak off-set hours (i.e., Friday nights and weekends). Therefore, the site is adequately maintained, and routine upkeep for the site is facilitated by the off-set hours. Based upon routine site inspections, these issues up until this point, have been adequately mitigated. However, use of the site by Carnival Malls on a majority of these holidays could lead to impacts to other site users operating at the same time. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MOD. TO CUP 91-03 - JAMES PAGE March 25, 1992 Page 3 Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the expanded hours of operation to include the following holidays only: Independence Day, Memorial Day, Thanksgiving Day, and Christmas Day. C- Expanded Hours of Operation on Fridays: In addition to requesting expanded hours of operation during holidays, the applicant is requesting that the Planning Commission extend their current hours of operation to include Fridays from 10 a.m. to 8 p-m. (See Exhibit "C- 1." ) Staff Comments: The applicant currently maintains the following hours of operation: Monday through Friday - 10: 00 a .m. - 5: 00 p.m. ( Incidental, stacking of merchandise for vendors and office hours for the management team- not open to the public. ) Friday - 6:00 p.m. - 9:00 p.m. - Retail Sales Saturday - 10:00 a.m. - 8:00 p.m. - Retail Sales Sunday - 10:00 a.m. - 6:00 p.m. - Retail Sales The primary impact of allowing retail sales during the daytime hours on Fridays is parking. As discussed in Part B above, the parking study projected an 85-space parking deficit on site for all users operating at the same time on a weekday (see Alternative 3 of Exhibit "D")- The parking standards applied to this alternative are consistent with the existing Industrial Area Specific Plan and Development Code requirements. Therefore, staff cannot support the expansion bocause of the inadequacy of parking facilities on-site- OTHER ISSUES: When this project was originally approved, the Planning Commission found it important to establish a compliance review for the intended use- The condition requires that the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing, twelve months from the date of release of occupancy, to ensure conformance with the conditions of approval and any other health, safety, and welfare issues ( see Condition No · 16 in Exhibit "G" ). Staff has been carefully monitoring the business operation since their opening in November of 1991. The applicant has been in significant compliance with the conditions of approval- However, staff has been working with the applicant on two outstanding compliance issues: (1) security and (2) business licensing- A- Security - Approximately one week after the project's opening in November 1991, Carnival Malls released their security personnel and are in violation of this condition. Security was to be provided, a minimum of two security personnel for the first 25,000 square feet of leasable area, in addition to the personnel/management team- Staff has not received any security complaints from the users, PLANNING CO~4ISSION STAFF REPORT MOD. TO CUP 91-03 - JAMES PAGE March 25, 1992 Page 4 neighboring businesses, or the Police Department. This may be attributed, in part, to the sluggish economy which has curtailed their business volume. B. Business Licensing - The Planning Division and Business Licensing staff have worked very closely to ensure that all businesses locating within Carnival Malls are properly licensed. At present, approximately 38 percent of the businesses still in operation have not been licensed (see Exhibit "E"). Though the applicant has complied with the specific condition that a monthly list of businesses be provided to the Planning and Business Licensing Divisions, the intent of the condition has not been met. Businesses are operating without proper business licenses which means a loss of sales tax revenue for the City. Business Licensing has proved to be a difficult condition to enforce. In addition to the monthly tenant list, Business Licensing staff has had several on-site inspections on weekends in order to educate the vendors within Carnival Malls of the Business Licensing procedures. In reviewing this condition with the City Attorney, staff believes the language is as strong as it can be. Though these issues appear to be resolvable and are being addressed by the applicant, staff believes it to be important to raise these issues should the Commission find them germane to the applicant's request to expand the business operation. The condition requires that a review be conducted in November of 1992; however, the Commission may review a CUP at any other time deemed necessary to ensure compliance. RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT/POLICE DEPARTMENT: Both the Fire District and the Police Department have been notified of the proposed use- Both departments have expressed no objection to the applicant's request. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The Commission must make all of the following findings in order to approve this application: A- That the proposed use is in accordance with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the Industrial Specific Plan Subarea in which the site is located; and B. That the proposed use will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and C- That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Industrial Specific Plan. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MOD. TO CUP 91-03 - JAMES PAGE March 25, 1992 Page 5 CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property has been posted, and notices were sent to adjacent property owners within 300 feet of the project. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Part A and B, with modifications, of the applicant's request to expand the permitted uses and operate during specific holidays through the attached Resolutions of Approval. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission deny the applicant's request to expand the hours of operation to include Fridays through the attached Resolution of Denial. However, if after your review, the Commission deems that there is sufficient evidence to warrant a full compliance examination, then a public hearing date should be chosen and properly advertised to consider possible modification or revocation of the CUP. In that case, the applicant's request for expansion. should be continued to the same date. City Planner BB:ALH/jfs Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site Plan Exhibit "B" - Floor Plan Exhibit "C" - Applicant 's Letter Exhibit "D" - Parking Study Exhibit "E" - Business License Memo Exhibit "F" - ISP Land Use Summary Exhibit "G" - Resolution No. 91-80 Resolution of Approval for Expanded Uses Resolution of Approval to Operate During Specific Holidays Resolution of Denial to Expand the Hours of Operation December 1O, 1991 Anna-Lisa Hernandez, Assistant Planner Planning Department City of Rancho Cucamonga Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Dear Anna-Lisa: After careful consideration of our operation and its impact on the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Carnival Malls is applying to the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga for a MODIFICATION of its existing CUP at 11630 SIXTH Street. We are requesting the following: 1) Inclusion of Personal Service Sales in addition to New Products Sales. These Personal Services typically include, but are not limited to travel agencies, mortgage brokers, real estate sales, personal care, { beauty or nail care ), photography studios and other activities typical of a personal service nature. 2) Extention of our HOURS of OPERATION to include ALL LEGAL HOLIDAYS, such as;~EW YEARS DAYr VALENTINE'S DAY, LINCOLN'S & WASHINHTON'S BIRTHDAY, ST. PATRICK'S DAY, ARMED FORCES DAY, MEMORIAL DAY, FLAG DAY, I~DEPENDENCE DAY, LABOR DAY, COLUMBUS DAY, UNITED NATION'S DAY, HALLOWEEN, yETERANS DAY, THANKSGIVING, the day after THANKSGIVING and the week before CHRISTMAS. ' ' 3) Extentlon of our HOURS of Operation on FRIDAYS to Start at 10:00 AM. instead of b:0U PM. and End at 8~00 PM. We are requesting this for the following reasons: 1) Service Sales are a PERMITTED USE in our LAND USE SUB-AREA. It is also a PERMITTED USE in tBe ADJACENT OFFICE BUILDING on Site. It will be a MINOR portion of t~e Total Use of the Vendors in our facility. In most otfier cities it is a PERMITTED COMMERCIAL USE. It is also part of the EXISTING USE in the MAJOR MALLS in the City of Ranc~o Cucamonga. Z) Extention of Hours during HOLIDAYS means EXISTING TENANTS in the other buildings on site, during t~ose Holidays, WILL BE OFF. Since the surrounding area is INDUSTRIAL EVEN LESS TRAFFIC IMPACT will occur on tBese Holdays for t~e same reason. There should be NO TRAFFIC problem during t~e WEEK BEFORE CHRISTMAS in that this is a period when people take vacations and buskness in our area is generally light. ALL COMPARKBLE FACILITIES CHARGE "EXTRA RENTAL' w~lch means some of our Tenants will choose NOT to STAY OPEN and some will be tied up in FULL TIME JOBS ELSEWHERE. This will REDUCE our TOTAL occupancy, customer traffic and overall 3) PARKING STUDIES DONE ( ON COMPARABLE FACILITIES ) IN OUR INITIAL PARKING STUDY, SHOW THAT FRIDAY IS A 'LIGHT RETAIL DAY". We are a FAMILY FACILITY and FRIDAY is not a FAMILY SHOPPING DAY. In addition, a number of our TENANTS are EMPLOYED ELSEWHERE and DO NOT OPEN THEIR STORE ON FRIDAYS. This is the reason that FRIDAYS are a "LIGHT RETAIL DAY' in all comparable facilities. As per our SHARED PARKING STUDY done ~or the CUP, TABLE 7, ALTERNATE ~3, WEEKDAY PARKING, THE REPORT SHOWS THAT "WE CAN SAFELY OPERATE EVEN DURING THIS FRIDAY TIME PERIOD". Of ALL the requirements ~or parking availability the Limits under ALTERNATE ~3 are the most RESTRICTIVE, HOWEVER FOR THE TIME PERIOD REQUESTED WE MEET EVEN THOSE REQUIREMENTS. IT IS NOT OUR INTENT TO IMPLEMENT ALL THE REQUESTS OF THIS MODIFICATION. HOWEVER, WE DO NOT EXPECT TO MODIFY OUR CUP ON A YEARLY BASIS SO WE ARE_MAKING "ALL" OUR REQUESTS FOR T~E FUTURE NOW! Thank you again for your Kind help. JRP/Ia INDOOR RETAIL MALL Technical Notes PmparedbE Austia-Foust Assodsm, Isse. 2020 North Tustin Avenue Santa Aria, California 92701 (714) 667-0496 May 31, 1991 INDOOR RETAIL MALL Technical Notes INTRODUCTION Austin-Foust Associate~, Inc. (AFA) has completed a paricing study for the Indoor Retail Mall located at the northwest comer of Buffalo Avenue and Sixth Street in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. This project will occupy one of three existing buildings and share the use of the available parking with the adjacent buildings in the common parking areas. The project site is proposed to be developed with 103,552 square feet of an Indoor Retail Mall that would cater to families with a mix of activities for both shopping and entertainment (kiddy rides and television that includes sporting events and moons). The proposed hours of operation are 6:00 PM to 9:00 PM on Friday, 10:00 AM to 8:00 PM bn Saturday and 10:00 AM to 6.-00 PM on Sunday. The study approach involved an actual case study of the fluctuations in hourly parking demand for the proposed use to determine the time and extent of peak parking. Typically two or three sites are selected for case study, based on ability to isolate the use and its parking, and then observed for two to three weekdays and a weekend. In this case, the project is unique and comparable developments do not exist However, some sirelist developments do exist as indoor swap meet uses. The Indoor Retail Mall parking demand is based on an actual case study of an existing indoor swap meet The total hourly parking demand created by the proposed Indoor Retail Mall is then compared with the available spaces to determine if sufficient parking is provided. ANALYSIS The project site i~ currently comprised of a total of 203,365 square feet of commercial, light industrial/warehousing, and o/fwe use~ (38,308 square feet of office use, and apprcrdmattly 165,057 square. feet of comme~isYl~ht industrial use) al illustrated in F~,ure 1. Presently, the site i~ 17 percent occupied (34,800 square feet of comm~wia!Aight indmtrial). The variety of uses at this location presents a good oppornmity for reciprocal or shared-me of the available parking by tenants. The site pre~ntly provide~ approximately 760 parking -~pace~. lmieorRetailMall 1 Aums~-~st~ Inc. Indoor Swan Meet Case Study T! A case study of actual parking demand and hourly accumulation for an indoor swap meet was conducted. Friday and Saturday were selected as representing the most similar peak parking demand l for this type of development The site selected was: '~'-I Startton Indoor Swap Meet 10401 Beach Boulevard Startton, California -~'--I The observed hourly parking accumulation and percent usage are summ~ in the following r--I table: PARKINO ANALYSIS !I~DOOR SWAPMEET St~to~ IVtmim-,,, Slumam Av~ila{~ 107 HOUR W~w=tq~_Ay OF OBSERVED OBSBRVBD DAY 'l,SPA_t~_~ 'l, $pA_c'~28 7w., .... 8arm .... I0 m 17~1, 18 11 m 4241, 4f ~ 67 12 Ixm ~ 54 ~ 7~ I pm 2 pm 3 pm 61~ 6~ 90~ 96 4 pm 69~ 74 94~ 100 6 pm 6~ 69 71~ 76 7pm 8pm 9pm .... I0 pen .... 11 pm .... 12am .... ~ examination of this table indicates that a maximum of 107 space~ were occupieci for the site on Saturday at 2.'00 Indoor Rfiail Mall 3 ~stin-Foost Amoc~te~ in a parking ratio of 2.68 spaces per TSF (107 spaces per 40.0 'lxSF -- 2.68 spaces per TSF). For this analysis, a 15 percent surplus factor has been added to the observed rate which yields a parking rate of 3.1 spaces per TSF (2.6 spaces x 1.15 percent = 3.1 spaces. Therefore, based on actual case study, the proposed 103.522 TSF indoor retail mall will require a parking demand of 320 spaces (103,552 per TSF X 3.1 spaces per TSF = 320 spaces). Another site in Woodland FIills was examined for use in the case study, however, security at that site would not permit counting of the parking. Off-site observations of the parking usage did indicate that the on-site parking provided (759 spaces) was more than sue~cient at this site to meet the demand. Using the site size of 150 TSF and 759 avsilable parking spaces calculates to a parking ratio of 5.06 spaces per TSF. (759 spaces per 150.00 TSF = 5.06 spaces per TSF). Ind~untriai Mn~nufacturina/Warebousin~ Case Study A case study of actual parking demand and hourly accumulation for an industrial manufacturing/warehousing facility was conducted. Friday and Saturday were selected as representing the most similar peak parking demand for this type'of development. Two sites were selected: Regal Rattan, Rancho Cucamonga Pier 1 Imports, Rancho Cucamonga I The highest observed hourly parking acctnnulation and percent usage are summafiz~ in Table 1. An etnminatiOn Of ~ table indicates that a Ipnvlmnm of 13 spaces (72 percent) were I occupied for the site on Friday at 11.~0 AM.. These observed hourly parking demand ratios were used to determine the total hourly parking demand for the mnt~der of the industrial/warehousing t use (26.705 TSF) at the site. I Hourly parking accumulation percentages for office and the commercinlFmdust~al uses are derived from the Urban Land Institute (ULI) publication, ~ dated 1983 and other I Austin-Foust Associates, Inc. (AFA) parking studies (Le, V'trginia Dare Study in Rancho Cucamonga). I Imlott Retail Mall 4 Amtin-Foust Asaoaatet Inc, Table 1 PARKING ANALYSIS - INDUSTRIAL MANUFACTURING/WAREHOUSING S~ces Rcqun, ed: 18 (1/2000) HOUR WEEKDAY WEEKEND OF OBSERVED OBSERVED DAY % SPAt'~ % SpACe:: 6am _ 7 ~m _ ' I0 nm 7296 13 0'96 0 11 nrn ,50% 9 0% 0 12 pm 6196 11 O~ 0 I pm 50% 9 09~ 0 2 pm 44% 8 0~ 0 3 pm 44% 8 0~ 0 4 pm 44, 8 0% 0 5 pm 2:2~ 4 O'gb 0 6 pen ' - 09~ 0 '7 pm _ _ 8 ~ _ _ _ 9 pm _ _ _ ' 10 pen _ _ 11 pm _ _ 12 am _ _ _ _ -**,, Indoor Retail Mall 5 Aretin-From ,amocatc~. Luc, -'--I The project site presently provides 760 parking spaces to serve the site land uses. The City of Rancho Cucamonga requires a 10 percent buffer to accommodate for unexpected fluctuations in parking demand and parking turnover. With a 10 percent buffer, the center can accommodate a maximum demand for 691 parking spaces at any given time (760 spaces/110 percent = 691 spaces). I The Urban Land Institute has found that reciprocal or shared use parking can result in a Ireduction of parking requirements as a result of land uses that operate during off-peak times of adjacent land uses. I The parIcing demand for the project was e:r~mlned using the retail (Alternative 1), the Iobserved indoor swap meet (Alternative 2) parking demand and a 1:150 (Alternative 3) parking ratio for the project. I Table 2 presents the demand rat~ for each of the site use~ at any given time and the total '1 parking demand based on the site uses under the three alternatives. Tables 3 through 8 summarize the projected parking demand and reciprocal use rate~ for the t three alternative site uses. 1 The "net parIcing demand" column contains the estimated parking demand for the ultimate '1 site uses based on shared parking and reciprocal u~ A~ this table shows, the maximum parIcing demand on a Friday evening would be 570 spm:~ (Alternative 1), 357 spac~ (Alternative 2), or 609 space~ (Alternative 3). On a Saturday evening, the auramum parifing demand would be 430 space~ (Alternative 1), 336 spac~ (Alternative 2), or 707 spaces (Alternative 3). With a 10 percent buffer, the center would require a minimum of 627 parki!lg spacls ullder Alterllative 1, 393 spaces under t Alternative 2, and 778 spaces under Alternative 3. These totals are well below the existing supply of 760 parking spaces, except for Saturday - Alternative 3 at 2.-00 PM. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS ! A shared parltlng study, conducted by AFA, found a peak parking demand of 707 spaces for the site uses if the proposed project is required to provide a parking ratio of 1:150. The site presently provides 760 parking spaces. However, the City of Rancho Cucamonga requires a 10 tndo~ area taU 6 Amm-Fo~ A~,,~, Table 2 SITE PARKING REO UIREbt2F_.N~ WEEKDAY WEEKEND . TOTAL TOTAL SIZE PARKING SPAC~_.S PARKING SPACES LAND USE TSF REQUIREMENT REOU/RED RE(~UtRF-M~_NT REQLr~,_', IndtmtrmJ Occupied 34.800 1/'2000 18 0 0 Vscant 26,705 1,r~}00 13 0 0 Office Vacant 38.30e 1~ 153 .6&/1000 26 Retail 103.552 4/1000 414 4/1000 41.~4 TOTAL 591t 440 Occupied 34.800 1/2000 18 0 0 Vacant 26,705 1/2000 13 0 0 Vacant 3830e 1~2~0 153 .6M000 26 Indoor Retail 1O3352 3.1/1000 ~20 3.1/1000 32O TOTAL 504 346 AlttsnsS~3 Occupied 34.800 1/2000 18 0 0 Vat 126, 705 ~ 13 0 0 Vacant 38318 ~ L~3 .68/1000 26 Indoor Rttail 103352 1:1S0 691 l:l,r~0 691, TOTAL 875 * 717 't Indoor Retail Mall 7 lunCh-Fount ~tet Lnc_ '1 Tab|e 3 WEEKDAY HOURLY ACCUMULATION OF PARKING INDOOR RETAIL MALL (A,~ Rc~il) OCCUPIED VACANT VACANT VACANT Nc~ Hour INDUSTRIAL INDUSTRIAL OFFICE RETAIL Parking *-,r--- I Of Day % Spa~x~ % SpsC~ % Sp-,,,m % S~_n~__ 6:00 AM .... 3% 5 - - 5 7:00 .... 20~ 31 8% 33 64 I8:00 .... (~3% 96 18% 75 171 9:.00 .... 9'3% 142 42% 174 316 -,r-- 10:.00 T2 13 72 9 100~ 153 68% 282 457 11:00 50 9 50 7 100'~ 153 8'7% 360 529 i 12;00 PM 61 11 61 8 90% 138 97~ 402 559 1:00 .~0 9 .50 9 90% 138 100% 414 5'70 -r--- 2:00 44 8 44 6 97% 148 97% 402 564 3:00 44 8 44 6 97~ 148 95% 393 _~ 4:00 44 8 -* 44 6 779~ 118 87% 360 492 5:00 22 4 22 3 479f~ 72 79% 327 406 6:00 .... 23t 35 8'2% 340 375 7:00 .... 7% 11 89% 369 380 . .. _ 8:00 .... 7% 11 i!7% 360 371 1 9:.130 .... 3'1, 5 61% 253 258 10:00 .... 3% 5 :32% 133 138 11:00 ...... 13% 54 54 1~-00 AM ........ MAXIMUM PARKING DEMAND:. 570 spsns st 1:00 PM ~ Urbtn tassd instinne, Yssared PatJinl,'lgeT. Table 4 Alteruauve 1 HOURLY ACCUMULATION OF. PARKING INDOOR RETAIL MALL (As Retml) OCCUPIED VACANT VACANT VACANT Net Hour INDUSTRIAL INDUSTRIAL OF'FICE RETAIL Parking Of Day % Sp~ % Spao~ % Spaces ~ Spaces Dem~n<i 6:00 AM .... 0% .... 7:00 .... 20% 5 3% 12 17 8:00 .... 60% 16 10% 41 57 9:.00 .... 80% 21 30 124 145 10:.00 0 0 0 0 80% 21 45% 186 207 11:00 0 0 0 0 100% 26 73% 302 328 12:00 PM I 0 0 0 100% 26 859~ 352 378 1:00 0 0 0 0 80% 21 9595 393 414 2:00 0 0 0 0 60% 16 100% 414 430 3:00 0 0 0 0 40% 10 100% 414 424 4:00 0 0 .. 0 0 40% 10 90% 373 383 5:00 0 0 0 0 20% 5 759~ 311 316 6:00 .... 20~ 5 659~ 269 274 7:00 .... 20~ 5 60% 248 253 8:00 .... ~ 5 55% 22~ 233 9:.00 ...... 40~ 166 166 10:00 ...... 38% 157 157 11:00 .... _ - - 139~ 54 54 12:00 AM ........ MAX]?dUM ?AR.K~G DF_.MAN~. 4~0 stnsca at 2:00 PM TabLe 5 Alternative 2 WP-EKDAY HOURLY AC~TION OF PAR~ING OCCL~IED VACANT VACANT INDOOR N~ Ho~r INDU~I'RIAL INDD~t'~AL OFF~C~ RETAIL ~ Of Day ~ Spaces % Spaces % Spaces % Spa¢~ D~mand 6:00 AM .... 3% 5 - - 5 7:00 .... 20~ 31 - - 31 8:00 .... 63% 96 - - 96 9:00 .... 93% 142 - - 142 10:.00 72% 13 72% 9 100~ 153 17% 54 229 11:00 50~ 9 50~ 7 100'~ 153 42% 134 303 12~00 PM 61% 11 61% 8 90% 138 50'% 160 317 1:00 50% 9 50~ 9 90~ 138 50% 160 316 2:00 44% 8 44% 6 97% 148 60'% 192 354 3:00 44% 8 44% 6 97% 148 61% 195 357 4:00 44% 8 .- 44% 6 77% 118 69% 221 353 5:00 22% 4 22% 3 47% 72 65% 208 287 6:00 .... 23% 35 65% 208 243 7:00 .... 7% 11 - - 11 8:00 .... 7% 11 - - 11 9.00 .... 3% 5 - - 5 10:00 .... 3% 5 - - 5 11:00 ......... 12:00 AM ......... MAXIMUM PARKING DEMAND:. ~7 spades at 3'00 PM Sounz: Urban l. lnd Institute, "Shaml Paxkix~' 1~7. Austm-Foust Assoaats, lnr,, Wialinia Darts part, h,,* Study," 1~9. t ~ R~ail ~ 10 Aus~-Fousl ~s~x~a~t h~c. Table 6 \ AJtu'na~=,v~ 2 HOURLY AC~TION OF PARICING INDOOR RETAIL MALL OCCUPIED VAC. ANT VACANT INDOOR Net Hour INI}LTSTRIAL INDUSTRIAL OFFICE RETAIL Patting 6:00 AM ....... 7.-00 .... 209~ $ _ _ 5 8:00 .... 60~ 16 - - 16 9:.00 .... 80~ 21 - - 21 10:00 0 0 0 0 80~ 21 20~ 64 85 11:00 0 C 0 0 1009~ 26 63~ 202 238 12~00 PM 0 0 0 0 100~ 26 70~ 224 250 1:00 0 0 0 0 80~ 21 84t 269 290 2:00 0 0 0 0 60~ 16 100~ 320 336 3:00 0 0 0 0 4091, 10 909f~ 288 2~ 4:00 0 0 -- 0 0 40~ 10 9491, 301 311 5:00 0 0 0 0 20~ 5 90~ 288 293 6:00 .... 20~ 5 7m.~ 237 232 7:00 .... 20~ 5 - _ 5 8:00 .... :20% 5 - _ 5 9:.00 ...... 10:00 ....... ' 11.'00 ....... MAXIMUM PARKING DEIAND: 336 spmnm at 3:00 pM sounz Ut'mnLandhmttm~'mmnnUParklnS,,lm?. Atom-From Atomrates, ~ "Virginia Date Patiinl Study," m "'~ Indoor' Retail Mall I1 Augtin-Fomt Aaaoc~atet Lur_ Table Alternative 3 WEEKDAY HOI. fRLY ACCUMULATION OF PARKING INDOOR KETAIL MALL (1:150) OCCUPIED VACANT VACANT INDOOR Net Hour iNDUSTRIAL INDUSTRIAL OFFICE RETAIL Parking Of Day % S~""~ % S~c~__ % Spaces % Spaces De~Op~l 6:00 AM .... 39~ 5 - - 5 7:00 .... 20~ 8:00 .... 63% 96 - - 96 9:00 .... 93~ 142 - - 142 10:.00 72~ 13 72% 9 100~ 153 17% 118 11:00 50ajb 9 509f9 7 100~ 153 42% 290 459 17'00 PM 619t, 11 61% 8 90~ 138 509f9 346 503 1:00 2:00 44% 8 4491~ 6 979[~ 148 60~ 415 577 3:00 44% 8 44% 6 97% 148 619~ 422 584 4:00 44% 8 .44% 6 77% 118 69~ 477 609 5:00 22% 4 22~ 3 47~ 72 65% 449 528 7:00 .... 7% 11 - - 11 8:00 .... 79~ 11 - - 11 ~00 .... 3~ 5 - - 1~00 .... 3% 5 - - 5 11:00 ......... 12:00 AM ......... MAXIMUM PARKING DEMAND:. 609 sprains at 4:00 PM Soun~ Urban Land Institute., ~hared Parking,' 1987. Austin-Foust Amociatn, lnc., "Vltgilxia ~ park. in_s Study,' 1989. Indoor Retail Mall 12 Austin-Foust Assocatet fur., 'i I 'D,b!~ 8 "" HOURLY ACCUMULATION OF PARKING INDOOR RETAIL MALL (1:1~0) I OCCUPIED VACANT VACANT INDOOR Net Hour INDUSTRIAL INDU~RIAL OFFICE RETAIL ParlUng i Of Day 6:00 AM ......... 7:00 .... 20% 5 - - 5 i 8:00 .... 60% 16 - - 16 9:.00 .... 80% 21 - - 21 10:.00 0 0 0 0 80~ 21 11:00 0 0 0 0 100% 26 12~00 PM 0 0 0 0 100% 26 70% 484 510 I 1:00 0 0 0 0 80% 21 84% ~80 601 2;00 0 0 0 0 60% 16 100% 691 707 3:00 0 0 0 0 40% 10 90% 622 632 4:00 0 0 0 0 40% 10 94% 650 660 I 5:00 0 0 0 0 :20% 5 90% 6:Z2 627 6:00 .... 2.0% ~ 71~ 491 496 7:00 .... 21~ ~ - - 5 8:00 .... ~- 10:.00 ......... 11:00 ......... 12;00 AM ......... ! MAXIMUM PARKING DEMAND:. 707 spsas st 2-00 PM I Sout~ Ueasn Lmsd Istitute, ~5hsml Pattin&" 1~7. II Indoor Rettil Mall 13 Austin-Foust Assocates. Inc. _! percent buffcr which reduces the maximum allowablc dcmand to 691 spaces. A parking ratio of 1:150 for the proposed project building plus the other site uses would exceed the city's allowable parking demand by 16 spaces. However, ease studies indicate that a parking requirement between 3.1 and 5.1 would be sufficent for the proposed use. The above findings indicate that providing for 691 parking spaces will be adequate to serve the anticipated parking demand for the proposexl project and other site uses in a shared parking enviroumenL The analysis concludes that: ® Case studies indicate the Indoor Retail Mall would have a peak parking demand of 3.1 spaces per TSF for a total of 320 parking spaces. ® Case studies indicate the industrial manufactming/warehousing us~ would have a peak peaking demand of .5 spaces per TSF for a total of 18 parking spaces. ® The inclusion of an Indoor Retail Mall and the vacant offic~ and commercial/light industrial us~ would have parking requirements at the immediate project site of 681 parking spaces. · The eaisting site presently provides for a total of 760 parking spaces. The City of Rancho Cucamonga requires a 10 percent buffer to accommodate for unexpected fluctuations in parking d~mancl and parking turnover which would provide for a peak parking demand for the entire c~nter of 691 spaces. · The peak weekday parking demand for the site is 609 (Alternativ~ 3, parking ratio of 1:150) space~. at 4.00 PM and the peak weekend parking demand is 707 (Alternative 3, parking ratio of 1:150) spaces at 2-00 PM, based on ULI guidelines and case studies. · Sufficient available parking is provided at the subject location. Indoor Retail Mail 14 Amtin-Fouat Asoo~ate~ Inc., Trafftc Oata Services, Inc. -r---I PARKING STUDY -r--I LOCATION: STANTON INDOOR SWAPMEET CZTY:STANTON I OATE: 5/17/91 OAY: FRXOAY FILENAME:O412304A TIme SECTIONS Pertod · r---I Beginning A B C D E F G H TOTAL # OF MARKED PARKING r--I SPACES PER SECTXON: 49 9 17 50 4! Z7 193 7:00 AM I 7:30 AM ~._ 8:00 AM 8:30 AN 9:00 AM I 9:30 AM \ 10:00 AM 3 0 2 3 0 10 0 18 10:30 AN I11:00 AN 9 5 8 10 0 13 0 45 11:30 AM 12:00 NOON 0 4 10 14 S 21 0 54 12:30 PN I 1:00 PM 3 3 7 16 S 19 0 53 1:30 PM 2:00 PM 4 1 9 26 8 16 0 64 ~1 2:30 PN 3:00 PN 3 3 7 29 2 21 0 65 3:30 PN 1 4:00 PM 3 3 11 29 8 20 0 74 · ' 4:3Q PN S:O0 PN 4 2 11 32 4 17 0 70 S:30 PM ~1 6:00 PM 4 Z 11 30 5 17 0 69 6:30 PM 7:00 PM 7:30 PM I COMMENTS: SECTION G * STREET PARKING ON FIRST ST '1 -I _1 Traffic Data Services, Inc. PARKING STUDY LOCATION: STANTON INDOOR SWAPMEET CITY:STANTON DATE: 5/29/91 DAY: WEDNESDAY FILENANE:O412305A Time SECTIONS Period Beginning A B C D E F G H TOTAL t OF HARKED PARKING '- SPACES PER SECTION: 49 9 17 50 41 27 193 7:00 AM 7:30 AM 8:00 AM 8: 30 AM 9:00 AM 9: 30 AM 10:00 AM 0 1 6 14 1 1 0 23 10:30 AM 11:00 AM 0 2 5 19 3 11 0 40 11:30 AM 12:00 NOON I 2 5 24 4 21 0 57 12:30 PM 1: O0 PM 0 2 6 23 4 15 0 50 1:30 PM 2:00 PM 1 2 5 25 2 10 0 45 2:30 PM 3:00 PM 0 2 5 25 3 15 0 50 3:30 PM 4: O0 I~M I 3 8 25 3 9 0 49 4:30 PM 5:00 PM 0 2 5:30 PM 6:00 PM 0 2 7 22 3 8 0 42 6:30 PM 7:00 PM 7:30 PM COMMENTS: SECTZON G ' STREET PARKZNG ON FZRST ST Traffic Data Services, Inc. I PARK[NG STUDY I LOCATION: STANTON INDOOR SWAPMEET CITY:STANTON IDATE: 5/25/91 DAY: SATURDAY FILENAME:O412306A Ttme SECTIONS Pertod IBeginning A B C 0 E F G H TOTAL # OF MARKED PARKING ISPACES PER SECTION: 49 "9 %7 50 41 27 [93 7:00 AM I7:30 AM 8:00 AM 8:30 AN 9:00 AN I9:30 AM I0:00 AN 0 0 4 14 2 1 0 21 10:30 AN I11:00 AN 3 1 10 34 7 12 0 67 11:30 AM 12:00 NOON 4 1 12 34 5 19 0 75 I12:30 PN 1:00 PN 8 2 11 33 16 20 0 90 1:30 PM 2:00 PN 6 5 10 36 25 25 0 107 I 2:30 PN 3:00 PN 8 3 10 34 19 22 0 96 3:30 PN t 4:00 PN 6 4 10 36 20 24 0 100 4:30 PN 5:00 PM 6 2 11 34 20 23 0 96 i5:30 PN 6:00 PN 6 3 10 30 11 16 0 76 6:30 PN 7:00 PH I7:30 PN '1 COMMENTS: SECTION G - STREET PARKING ON FIRST ST -I Trafftc Data Services, Inc. I PARKING STUDY I LOCATION: N/W CORNER OF BUFFALO & 6TH ST CITY: RANCHO CUCANONGA I DATE: 5/17/91 OAf: FRIDAY FiLENANE: 0412301B TIme SECTIONS Pertod ---I Beginning A B C O E F G TOTAL I OF NARKED PARKZNG I SPACES PER SECTION: 111 91 90 185 356 20 853 7:00 AN I 7:30 AM _ 8:00 AM 8:30 AN 9:00 AN +-t 9:30 AM lO:O0 AN 0 0 11 1 I 0 13 10:30 AN I 11:00 AN 0 0 8 1 0 0 9 11:30 AN 12:00 NOON 0 0 10 I 0 0 I 12:30 PN 1:00 PM I 0 8 0 0 0 9 1:30 PN i 2:00 PN 0 0 8 0 0 0 8 2:30 PN 3:00 PM 0 0 8 0 0 0 8 3:30 PN I 4:OO PN O 0 8 O 0 0 8 · 4:30 PM S:O0 PN 0 0 4 0 0 0 4 i 5:30 PM 6:00 PN O 0 0 O 0 O 0 6:30 PM 7:00 PM 7:30 PN CONNENTS: 1 _1 I Trafftc Data Services, Inc. PARKING STUDY --i LOCATION: N/W CORNER OF BUFFALO & 6TH ST CITY: RANCHO CUCAMONGA i DATE: 5/22/91 DAY: tEDNESDAy FILENAME: 0412302B Ttme SECTIONS Pertod I Beginning A 8 C D E F G TOTAL t OF MARKED PARKING I SPACES PER SECTION: 11! 91 90 185 356 20 853 7:00 AM 7:30 AM I 8:00 AN 8:30 AM 9:00 AN I 9:30 AM 10:00 AN 0 0 8 0 Z 0 10:30 AM 10 I 11:00 AM 0 0 8 0 2 0 11:30 AN 10 12:00 NOON 0 0 8 0 2 0 10 12:30 PM I 1:00 PM 0 0 8 0 Z 0 10 I: 30 PM 2:00 PN 0 0 7 0 [ 0 8 I 2:30 PN 3:00 PM 0 0 7 0 I 0 8 3:30 PN i 4:00 PN 0 0 7 0 0 0 7 4:30 PM 5:00 PN 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 S:30 PN I 6:00 PN 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6:30 PN 7:00 PN 7:30 PM COMMENTS: ,I Trafftc Data Services, Inc. J PARKZNG STUOY _1 LOCATION: N/W CORNER OF BUFFALO & 6TN ST CITY: RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: 5/18/91 DAY: SATURDAYFILENAME: 04123038 I .................................................................................. Ttme SECTIONS Period I Begfnntng A B C O E F G TOTAL # OF'MARKED PARKZNG i SPACES PER SECTZON: 111 91 90 185 356 20 853 7:00 AN 7: 30 * AN I 8: O0 AN 8:30 AN 9: O0 AM I 9:30 AN 10:00 AN 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10:30 AN 11:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 11:30 AM 12:00 NOON 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:30 PM I 1: O0 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I: 30 PM 2:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 2:30 PM 3:00 PN 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 3:30 PM 4:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 4:30 PN 5:00 PN 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:30 PN I 6:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6:30 PM 7:00 PN I 7:30 PM I COMMENTS: ilJl ,] Trafftc Data Services, Znc. PARKZNG STUDY LOCATZON: S/E CORNER OF BUFFALO & 6TH ST CZTY:RANCHO C~ AHONGA DATE: 5/17/91 DAY: FRZDAY FZLENAHE:0412301C TIme SECTZONS Pertod Beginning A B C D E F G H TOTAL t OF NARKED PARKZNG SPACES PER SECTZON: 83 12,6 30 42 58 63 39 441 7:00 AN 7:30 AN 8:00 AN 8:30 AN 9:00 AN 9:30 AN 10:00 AN 42 82 16 5 7 0 0 2 154 I0:30 AN 11:00 AN 45 84 16 3 7 0 0 0 155 11:30 AN 12:00 NOON 39 68 17 4 5 0 0 0 133 12:30 PN 1:00 PN 34 65 IS 4 4 0 0 0 122 1:30 PN 2:00 PN 21 41 1Z 4 4 0 0 1 83 2:30 PN 3:00 PN 10 28 14 3 4 0 0 0 59 3:30 PN 4:00 PN 9 24 4 3 3 0 0 0 43 4:30 PM 5:00 PM 6 11 I 3 2 0 0 0 23 5:30 PM 6:00 PN 5 7 I 3 2 0 0 0 18 6:30 PN 7:00 PN 7:30 PN COHNENT5: SECTZON N · STREET PARKZNG --I --I Trafftc Data Services, Inc. --.--~i PARKING STUDY i LOCATION: S/E CORNER OF BUFFALO & 6TH ST CITY:RANCHO C~ AMONGA DATE: 5/22/91DAY: WEDNESDAY FILENAME:0412302C I .......................................................................................... ~ Ttme SECTIONS Pertod I Beginning A B C O E F G H TOTAL # OF MARKED PARKING ~ I SPACES PER SECTION: 83 ~ 126 30 42 58 63 39 441 7:00 AM 7:30 AM L I 8:00 AM - 8:30 AM g:O0 AM ' L~II 9:30 AM 10:00 AN 42 74 9 3 4 0 0 2 134 10:30 AM tl:00 AM 50 68 10 3 4 0 0 6 141 11:30 AM 12:00 NOON 51 57 9 3 4 0 0 5 129 12:30 PH 'i 1:00 PN 33 45 13 3 4 0 0 6 104 - 1:30 PN 2:00 PN 14 30 15 2 3 0 0 6 70 2:30 PN - 3:00 PN 12 26 12 2 3 0 0 5 60 3:30 PM 4:00 PN 12 22 11 I 3 0 0 3 52 4:30 PN S:O0 PM 12 18 9 I 4 0 0 0 44 S:30 PM r6:00 PN 10 19 6 I 3 0 0 0 39 6:30 PN 7:00 PN 7:30 PN COMMENTS: SECTION H · STREET PARKZNG Traffic Oata Services, Inc. PARKING STUOY LOCATION: S/E CORNER OF BUFFALO~& 6TH ST CITY:RANCHO C~ AHONGA DATE: 5/18/91 DAY: SATURDAY FZLENANE:0412303C TIme SECTIONS Pertod Beginning A B C O E F G H TOTAL I OF MARKED PARKING SPACES PER SECTION: 83 ~2E 30 42 58 63 39 44! 7:00 AM 7:30 AM 8:00 AM 8:30 AM 9:00 AN 9:30 AM 10:00 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 10:30 AM 11:00 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 I 11:30 AN 12:00 NOON 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 12:30 PM 1:00 PM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1:30 PN Z:O0 PM 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 0 2:30 PM 3:00 PN 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 0 1 3:30 PN 4:00 PM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 4:30 PN 5:00 PM 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 0 I 5:30 PM 6:00 PN 0 0 6:30 PM 7:00 PM 7:30 PM COMMENTS: SECTZON H · STREET PARKING THERE WAS ONE CAR (A SECURITY GUARD) PARKED AND SITTING IN CAR THROUGH ENTIRE COUNT i Traffic Data Services, Inc. I PARKING STUDY LOCATION: PIER I IMPORTS DISTRIBUTION CENTER CITY: RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: 5/17/91 DAY: FRIDAY FILENAME: 0412301A Tree SECTZONS Perfod Beginning A B C 0 E F G TOTAL I OF N'ARKED PARKING SPACES PER SECTION: 184 184 7:00 AM 7:30 AM 8:00 AM 8:30 AM 9:00 AN 9:30 AM 10:00 AM 26 26 10:30 AN 11:00 AN 25 25 11:30 AN 12:00 NOON 26 26 1Z:30 PN 1:00 PN 20 20 1:30 PM 2:qO PM 26 26 2:30 PM 3:00 PN 24 24 3:30 PN 4:00 PM 3 3 4:30 PN 5:00 PM 1 1 5:30 PM 6:00 PN I 1 6:30 PN 7:00 PN 7:30 PM COMMENTS: I Trafftc Data Services, [no. PARKING STUDY LOCATION: PIER [ IMPORTS DISTRIBUTION CENTER CITY: RANCHO CUCANONGA DATE: 5/Z2/91 OAY: tEDNESOAY FILENAME: 0412302A Ttme SECTIONS Period Beginning A B C O E F G TOTAL t OF MARKED PARKING SPACES PER SECT[ON: 184' ., 184 7:00 AN 7:30 AN 8:00 AM 8:30 AN 9:00 AN 9:30 AN ' ~0 AN 45 45 , JO AN lZ:O0 AN 39 39 Zl:30 AN 12:00 NOON 40 40 12:30 PM 1:00 PN 40 40 1:30 PM 2:00 PM 49 49 2:30 PN 3:QQ PN 46 46 3:30 PN 4:00 PN 2 2 4:30 PN 5:00 PN 1 1 5:30 PN 6:00 PN 1 6:30 PN 7:00 PM 7:30 PH CONNENTS: ---I Trafflc Data Services, Inc. "'~1 PARKZNG STUDY ""'~1 LOCATZON: PZER I [MPORTS DZSTRZBUTZON CENTER CITY: RANCHO CUCAHONGA I DATE: 5/18/91 DAY: SATURDAY FILENAME: 0412303A TIme SECTZONS Period "1 Beginning A B C D E F G TOTAL I OF MARKED PARKZNG I SPACES PER SECTZON: 184 Z84 7:00 AM 7:30 AM ~ :1 8:00 AN 8:30 AN 9:00 AN CI 9:30 AN 10:00 AN 0 0 10:30 AN I1 11:00 AN 0 0 11:30 AN 12:00 NOON 0 0 12:30 PN ~.~ 1:00 PM 0 0 1:30 PM 2:00 PM 0 0 1 2:30 PN 3:00 PN 0 0 3:30 PN ~q 4: O0 PM 0 0 4:30 PM 5:00 PN 0 0 5:30 PN 6:00 PN 0 0 6:30 PM 7:00 PN 7:30 PM COMMENTS: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: February 4, 1992 TO: Anna Lisa Hernandez, Assistant Planner FROM: Lisa Harms, Business License Technician SUBJECT: REGARDING LICENSED AND UNLICENSED BUSINESSES IN THE CARNIVAL MALLS Using the January 6, 1-992, vendor list provided by the Carnival Malls, I came up with the following facts: Total amount of businesses licensed as of 1/28/92 108 Total amount of businesses licensed and still operating 51 Total amount of businesses unlicensed 32 ,-Yr- I will be contacting Carnival Malls to insure that the 32 unlicensed businesses obtain their business license with the city of Rancho Cucamonga. . \ TABLE II1-1 SUMMARY OF LAND USE TYPE BY SUBAREA t PERMITTED USE + CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USE NOTE: Non-marked Uses Not Permitted USE TYPES I LandUse* IP Ge GI el GI Sl ep IP!GI u~:sll~e~ IPiOl GI HI IP IP ISubareas He 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Ll111,2,1314151617 MANUFACTURING -- Light · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · Heavy · OFFICE PROFESSIONAL~ DESIGN & RESEARCI4 Professional/Design Services · + ~+ + · · + + · + + · · WHOLESALE~ STORAGE & DISTRIB~ION Light · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · Heavy + · + · COMMERCIAL Animal Care + + + + + + ~omotive Rental/Leasing · · · + + + · + Automotive/Truck Repair-Major · + · ~ · · Automotive Service Station + + + + + + + + + Building Contractor's Storage Yard · Building &Lighting Equiprant Supplies&Sales · + · + + · · + · Business Supped Sewices · · + · · + · · · + + · · · · + · · ~ Convenience Sales &Services + + + + + + + + + + + + + Entertainment + + + + + + Extollye ~ct ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Fast Food Sales + + + + + + +~+ Food & Beverage Sales +~+ + i + + + + + + + + + Heavy Equipment Sales &Renals + + + + + + + + · Laundry Services · · · · · · · ~ Personal Services + + + + + + + + + Recreatio~l Facilities + + + + + + + + · + + + · · · · · Scrap Operation CIVIC AdmINI~Uvo Civic ~lce8 · ~ ~ · ;~ · ~ · ~=~:;~ · · Cultural · + + + + Flood Control/~ility Co~idor · · · · · · · · · · · Public Safety &Utility Services + + + + + + + + + + +P+ + · IP-Industrial Park GI-General Industrial MI/HI-Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial He-Haven Ave. Overlay District HI-Heavy Industrial ~' ~ vise. / 0/8 Z]]-5 8/15/90 3/06/91 RESOLUTION NO. 91-80 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 91-03 FOR A 103,552 SQUARE FOOT INDOOR WHOLESALE/RETAIL COMMERCIAL USE LOCATED IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT, SUBAREA 11, INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AT 11530 SIXTH STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 229-026-28. A. Recitals. (i) James Page has filed an application for the issuance of the Conditional Use Permit No. 91-03 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application." (ii) On the 8th of May 1991, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) On the 8th of May 1991, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga reviewed associated file Modification to Conditional Use Permit 86-06 to amend the original file, allowing more intensive uses than those originally approved. (iv) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on May 8, 1991, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at 11530 Sixth Street with a street frontage of 715.15 feet and lot depth of 593.83 feet and is presently improved with 3 research and development buildings and 760 parking spaces; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 91-80 CUP 91-03 - JAMES PAGE June 26, 1991 Page 2 (b) The property to the north, south, east, and west is General Industrial. (c) The application contemplates the operation of an Indoor Wholesale/Retail Commercial use within an existing 103,552 square foot industrial building. (d) The application contemplates public hours of operation from 5:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. on Friday, 10:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. on Saturdays, and 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on Sundays. (e) The applicant proposes to maintain office hours from Monday through Friday and permit incidental stocking of merchandise for vendors only. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs i and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. (b) That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. (c) That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a mitigated Negative Declaration. 5. Based upon the findings and.conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below: 1) A minimum of four maintenance personnel will be on-site during public hours of operation. 2) Trash shall be picked up daily to ensure proper maintenance of the entire site. 3) Sufficient trash receptacles, compatible with existing pedestrian furniture, shall be added directly adjacent to, and interior to, all public entries. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 91-80 CUP 91-03 - JAMES PAGE June 26, 1991 Page 3 4) All graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours. 5) A minimum of two security personnel shall be on- site upon the release for occupancy of the wholesale/retail commercial use up to the first 25,000 square feet of leasable area. Upon occupancy of each of the proceeding 12,500 square feet, one additional security person shall be provided until full occupancy is reached. Security personnel shall secure both indoor and outdoor activities. 6) A management staff team of four to six people shall be on-site during operational hours upon occupancy of the first 25,000 square feet of leasable area. One additional management staff person shall be added upon occupancy of every proceeding 12,500 square feet of leasable area. 7) The swap meet organizer shall provide the Business License Department with an updated list on a monthly basis of all vendors. If the organizer does not supply the list, they will be responsible for business license payments for vendors. The list shall include the mailing addresses for all vendors. 8) In conjunction with the Business License process, all vendors shall be required to obtain a retail sales tax permit (Seller's Permit) through the State Board of Equalization, prior to obtaining a City Business License. The vendor shall be required to produce a retail/wholesale sales number to the Business Licensing Division upon application. 9) The management entity shall notify and monitor every vendor of their responsibilities and obligations for licensing and record keeping in compliance with the appropriate government agencies, including but not limited to, the City and the State Board of Equalization. 10) Prior to the issuance of building permits, the Building and Safety Department will require plans to be prepared for the plan check .review process. The plans must provide compliance with the Uniform Building, Plumbing, and the Mechanical Codes and the National Electrical Code as adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 91-80 CUP 91-03 - JAMES PAGE June 26, 1991 Page 4 11) All signage, in conjunction with the swap meet use, will be subject to the City's Sign Ordinance and any Uniform Sign Program in place on the project site. 12) Any special outdoor event, such as a promotional sale, shall be conducted by the management entity and shall be subject to separate review and approval of a Temporary Use Permit. 13) All activities shall be conducted inside the building. No display, sales, or food vendors shall be permitted outside the building, except as may be approved through a Temporary Use Permit. 14) The applicant shall submit a wastewater survey to the Cucamonga County Water District during the plan check process, prior to issuance of building permits, to determine pre-treatment requirements and any additional sewer development fees that may be required. 15) The applicant shall provide a separate water meter for the retail facility, as determined by the Cucamonga County Water District. Plans shall be submitted to the District for review and approval, prior to issuance of building permits. 16) Twelve months from the date of release of occupancy of the indoor wholesale/retail con~nercial use, the Planning Co~mission shall conduct a public hearing to review the project to ensure conformance with these conditions, and that the health, safety, and welfare of the General Public has been maintained. At that time of review, the Planning Commission may impose additional conditions upon this application, including, but not limited to, the payment of fees for additional City services, as determined by the affected divisions. 17) The application shall be subject to all conditions of approval, as set forth by Industrial Specific Plan Amendment 91-03 and modification to Conditional Use Permit 86-06. 18) Occupancy of the facility shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and State Fire Marshall's regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall -j7 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 91-80 CUP 91-03 - JAMES PAGE June 26, 1991 Page 5 be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division to show compliance. The building shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 19) Prior to occupancy all dead or dying vegetation shall be replaced with material of like kind and size subject to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF JUNE 1991. ATTEST: -- /ra~, ~y I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 26th day of June 1991, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MCNIEL, M~LCHER, TOLSTOY, VALLETTE NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 91-03, PART A, TO ALLOW MORTGAGE BROKERS, REAL ESTATE SERVICES, TRAVEL BUREAUS, BEAUTY/NAIL SALONS, JEWELRY REPAIR SERVICES, AND PHOTOGRAPHY STUDIOS WITHIN THE EXISTING CARNIVAL MALLS, LOCATED AT 11530 SIXTH STREET IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 229-262-28. A. Recitals. (i) James Page has filed an application for a modification to Conditional Use Permit No. 91-03 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit modification request is referred to as "the application." (ii) On the 26th day of February 1992, and continued to the 25th day of March and the 8th day of April 1992, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on April 8, 1992. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on February 26, March 25, and April 8, 1992, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at 11530 Sixth Street with a street frontage of 715.15 feet and lot depth of 593.83 feet and is presently improved with three research and development buildings and 760 parking spaces; and (b) The property to the north, south, east, and west is General Industrial; and (c) The Industrial Area Specific Plan conditionally permits the proposed uses with Subarea 11; and (d) The proposed uses will be conducted within an enclosed, free-standing building that is predominantly leased to retailers. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. MOD. TO CUP 91-03, PART A - JAMES PAGE April 8, 1992 Page 2 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. (b) That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. (c) That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issued a Negative Declaration at its previous review on June 25, 1991. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below. 1) All conditions identified in Resolution 91-80 shall be applied to this application. 2) All conditions identified in Resolution 86-78A shall be applied to this application. 3) The approval pertains to an expansion of the permitted uses to include the following Uses: mortgage brokers, real estate services, travel agencies, beauty/nail salons, jewelry repair services, and photography studios only. 4) The applicant shall submit documentation of compliance with the Condition of Approval regarding security to the satisfaction of the City Planner within thirty days from the date of this approval. 5) The applicant shall pay the necessary transportation development fees to the Building and Safety Division within thirty calendar days from the date of this approval. The amount shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. MOD. TO CUP 91-03, PART A - JAMES PAGE April 8, 1992 Page 3 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF APRIL 1992. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, S~cretary . I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of April 1992, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 91-03, PART B, FOR THE EXPANSION OF THE HOURS OF OPERATION TO INCLUDE INDEPENDENCE DAY, LABOR DAY, MEMORIAL DAY, NEW YEAR'S DAY, THANKSGIVING DAY, AND CHRISTMAS DAY, WITHIN THE EXISTING CARNIVAL MALLS, LOCATED AT 11530 SIXTH STREET IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 229-262-28. A. Recitals. (i) James Page has filed an application for a modification to Conditional Use Permit No. 91-03 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit modification request is referred to as "the application." (ii) On the 26th day of February 1992, and continued to the 25th day of March and the 8th day of April 1992, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on April 8, 1992. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on February 26, March 25, and April 8, 1992, including written and' oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at 11530 Sixth Street with a street frontage of 715.15 feet and lot depth of 593.83 feet and is presently improved with three research and development buildings and 760 parking spaces; and (b) The property to the north, south, east, and west is General Industrial. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. MOD. TO CUP 91-03, PART B - JAMES PAGE April 8, 1992 Page 2 (a) That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. (b) That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. (c) That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issued a Negative Declaration at its previous review on June 25, 1991. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs l, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below. 1) All conditions identified in Resolution 91-80 shall be applied to this application. 2) All conditions identified in Resolution 86-78A shall be applied to this application. 3) The modification allows for an expansion of the hours of operation to include the following holidays: Independence Day, Labor Day, Memorial Day, New Year's Day, Thanksgiving Day, and Christmas Day. 4) The applicant shall submit documentation of compliance with the condition of approval regarding security to the satisfaction of the City Planner within thirty calendar days from the date of this approval. 5) The applicant shall pay the necessary transportation development fees to the Building and Safety Division within thirty calendar days from the date of this approval. The amount shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. MOD. TO CUP 91-03, PART B - JAMES PAGE April 8, 1992 Page 3 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF APRIL 1992. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of April 1992, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 91-03, PART C, FOR THE EXPANSION OF THE HOURS OF OPERATION ON FRIDAYS, LOCATED IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 229-262-28. A. Recitals. (i) James Page has filed an application for a modification to Conditional Use Permit No. 91-03 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit modification request is referred to as "the application." (ii) On the 26th day of February 1992, and continued to the 25th day of March and the 8th day of April 1992, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on April 8, 1992. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on February 26, March 25, and April 8, 1992, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at 11530 Sixth Street with a street frontage of 715.15 feet and lot depth of 593.83 feet and is presently improved with three research and development buildings and 760 parking spaces; and (b) The property to the north, south, east, and west is General Industrial. (c) Sufficient parking facilities exist for the proposed expansion of operation hours based upon a shared parking study which indicates a peak demand of 691 spaces (including a 10 percent buffer). 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. MOD. TO CUP 91-03, PART C - JAMES PAGE April 8, 1992 Page 2 (b) That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. (c) That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issued a Negative Declaration at its previous review on June 25, 1991. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below. 1) All '~onditions identified in Resolution 91-80 shall be applied to this application. 2) All conditions identified in Resolution 86-78A shall be applied to this application. 3) The modification allows for an expansion of the hours of operation on Fridays to from 10:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. 4) The applicant shall submit documentation of compliance with the condition of approval regarding security to the satisfaction of the City Planner within thirty calendar days from the date of this approval. 5) The applicant shall pay the necessary transportation development fees to the Building and Safety Division within thirty calendar days o from the date of this approval. The amount shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF APRIL 1992. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. MOD. TO CUP 91-03, PART C - JAMES PAGE April 8, 1992 Page 3 ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of April 1992, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING USE DETERMINATION NO. 92-02, REQUESTING THAT AN OUTDOOR ELECTRONICS SWAP MEET BE INCORPORATED INTO AN EXISTING INDOOR WHOLESALE/ RETAIL/COMMERCIAL USE THROUGH THE TEMPORARY USE PERMIT PROCESS, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. (i) James Page has filed an application for the approval of Use Determination No. 92-02 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Use Determination request is referred to as "the application." (ii) On the 8th day of April 1992, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date. (iii) All legal"prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting on April 8, 1992, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application contemplates the operation of an electronics outdoor swap meet in conjunction with the existing Carnival Malls, an indoor wholesale/retail commercial use; and (b) The applicant has requested that the use be operated one Saturday per month through the Temporary Use Permit process; and (c) Outdoor swap meets are only permitted within the Heavy Industrial zone, Subarea 15, of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, through the Conditional Use Permit process; and (d) The Temporary Use Permit process (in conjunction with a parking lot sale) limits the applicant to: (1) A maximum of three consecutive days. (2) No sale for any business or any other businesses located on the same lot or parcel, or within a shopping center, shall be permitted within 30 days of another sale; PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. UD 92-02 - JIM PAGE April 8, 1992 Page 2 (3) A maximum of three sales shall be permitted for each business during each calendar year; however, one additional sale may be permitted for any business located within a shopping center provided that at least 50 percent of the businesses occupying the center participate concurrently in such sale; (4) The items to be sold shall be of the same type that are regularly displayed and sold at the business location. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) The proposed electronics outdoor swap meet use is inconsistent with the provisions of the Temporary Use Permit process because it would occur more than three times a year; and (b) The proposed outdoor swap meet use is inconsistent with the zoning of the district in which it proposes to located; and (c) The proposed outdoor swap meet is inconsistent with the intent of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, which prohibits outdoor swap meets in Subarea 11. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby determines that the electronics swap meet is classified as an outdoor swap meet which is prohibited in Subarea 11. 5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF APRIL 1992. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Bullet, Secretary PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. UD 92-02 - JIM PAGE April 8, 1992 Page 3 I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of April 1992, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Leeona Klippstein ~PR0 1992 san Bernard/no Sage Friends ,',~ ~ 1382 Wesley Avenue 718 glle l!t:ll:?i8 4 l Pasadena, CA. 91104 City of Rancho Cucamonga c/o Bauer Environmental Services 2530 Red Hill Avenue Santa Ana, CA. 92705 April 5, 1992 Re: Notice of Preparation (NOP) Subsequent Environmental Impact Report, Tentative Tract 14475, SCH#90021132. Cucamonga Wash/ Canyon, City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernard/no County. Ms. Sandre Bauer, Mr. Scott Murphy, The City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission and City Council, San Bernard/no Sage Friends is a grassroots conservation coalition, with several hundred individual supporters, including endorsements from the Endangered Habitats League (a coalition of over 30 environmental organizations), Southern Califo~rnia Sierra Club Biodiversity Task Force, The Green Party of Southern California, The John Muir Center for Regional Studies and a invited member of the State Resources Agencies, Advisory Committee "Natural Communities Conservation Planning" (NCCP) on coastal sage scrub. We appreciate this opportunity to review and make comment on the, Environmental Assessment and Vesting Tentative Tract 14475 - Sahama Investments - A residential subdivision and design review of 71 single family residences on 113 acres of land in the hillside residential (less than 2 dwelling units per acre) and Open Space Districts, located north of Almond Avenue between Sapphire and Turquoise Streets - APN; 200-051-07, 55, 56, and 57. Associated with this application is Tree Removal Permit No. 92-06. As a follow up to our phone-conversations and past written responses, We request that this letter and enclosed information be included in the administrative record of aforementioned proposed project, TT 14475, SCH # ~0021132. As you are aware, San Bernard/no Sage Friends and I are extremely concerned in regards to the continued loss of Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub communities and the cumulative impacts this has on plants and wild- life that depend on this rare ecosystem. The California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) and The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) are also very concerned about the rapid loss of this habitat. Please refer to the enclosed letters from these agencies of recent date, 3/13/92 & 4/1/92. It is a generous estimate that indicates that there is less than 5% of alluvial fan coastal & rivers/dean sage scrub remaining in Southern California. Cucamonga Canyon/Wash is included in this appallingly low number. As you are aware, the Cucamonga Canyon/ comments,TT14475 page 2 Wash, alluvial fan ecosystem, sage scrub habitat was"once widely distributed along the southern outwashes of the San Gabriel and San Bernardino mountains, but has now become confined to remnant patches along unaltered streams and out washes, as residential and flood control projects have eliminated it from most of its former range." (CDFG). Other comments by CDFG include.." Because Riversidean Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub has become one of the rarest habitats in the state, the Department still contends that compensation for loss of this habitat should reflect a replacement ratio of 2:1 for inkind habitat," "The California Environmental Quality Act ( CEQA ) in section 15125 requires that an EIR include special emphasis on environmental resources that are rare or unique to the region. The Department is concerned about biological surveys being conducted just prior to grading permits being issued. In the Departments view this is too late for identifying biological impacts and for acquiring size specific mitigation measures." The Department then sites a pref- erred mitigation measure .... " that individual proj.ect proponents be required to complete focused EIR's in which detailed biological survey information is obtained for all sensitive~ threatened and endangered species within their projects footprints as well as to contributing to surveys for the entire alluvial fan sage scrub area " San Bernardino Sage Friends and.I recommend that Sahama Invest- ments Inc. become participants of" Natural Communities Conservation Planning"(NCCP) on coastal sage scrub. The NCCP Act of 1991,AB 2172, selected the coastal & riversidean sage scrub plant and animal community of southern California fop its first attempt to implement this law. The ConserVation Planning area for this effort includes northern San Bernardino County and specifically those areas that still contain alluvial fan sage scrub; including Rancho Cucamonga. According to The California Natural Diversity Data Base (1987), Alluvial Fan Vegetation is considered a unique habitat with high priority for preservation. Unfortunately, even with the high priority for preservationZcategory, the cumulative impacts of urbanization and flood control diversions/channel~zations continue to push this unique and rare e~ologieat community into extinction. We remind you that extiction is forever and that we have a re'spons- ibility and reverence for all Life, great and small. In a recent phone conversation, 4/1/92, with Bauer Environmental Services, senior biologist, Dave Levine, I voiced my opinion that biological surveys and assessments are inadequate for this project. Dave Levine made a statement that the EIR process is a GAME. San Bernardino Sage Friends and I do not appreciate this attitude to- wards the environment and sensitive ecosystems. We recommend that Bauer Environmental Services, The City of Rancho Cucamonga and Developers of concern, obtain biological surveys and assessments, required by CEQA , with t.he ser~sness and integrity that these significant, rare and unique biological communities warrant. comments, -TT14475 page 3 Biological surveys and assessments contained in Appendix C, Biological Resource Analysis for TT14475, are in my opinion less than minimal and fail to disclose significant and substancial evidence concerning sensitive, threatened and endangered species. As disclosed, the biological assesments for TT14475, were obtained by surveys on foot and by motor vehicle, on March 26, 1984 and then revisited on November 15 and 19, 1990. Surveying a site in the Winter season, is no way to obtain accurate biological assessments. On page 2, third paragraph of appendix C "The site is expected to support much of the wildlife characteristic of. typical southern California inland foothill habitat. Most of the species expected to be present were not observed during the site survey due to their secretive nature or the time o~ year durxn~ which the survey was conducted." The guessing GAME of biological assessments-from Bauer Environ- mental Services is over. The Biological Resource Analysis for TT14475 is inaccurate, misleading and fails to disclose significant substantial evidence of plant and wildlife. Since 1990, the sage sparrow, rufus-crowned sparrow and horned lark have all become candidate-2 species. All three species occur on site. TT14475, Appendix C fails to disclose this information in context. San Bernardino Sage Friends and I recommend that this significant information be included and that assessments of Sensitive Species be corrected. The EIR for this project, TT14475, fails to address and recog- nize the cumulative biological impacts on the unique and rare alluviaI fan sage scrub and related communities, which effects all plant and wildlife on site. From Big Tujunga Wash, Los Angeles, in the western most region,of the San Gabriel Mountains to Sierra Ridge, San Berardino in the east, ALL ALLUVIAL FAN SAGE SCRUB HABITAT IS PROPOSED FOR DEVELOPMENT. San Bernardino Sage Friends and I recognize the challenging task concerning all involved in this project, taking into consideration the risks of wildfire, floods and earthquakes to human life. Unfortunately, the design of this project did not fully recognize the environment, or go far enough in protecting the rare alluvial fan plant and wildlife community. All lot designs would destroy this unique and rare ecosystem through fragmentation and diversion of hydrology. The TT14475 project warrants new indepth SPRING surveys to obtain accurate biological information of significance. Two endangered plant species, the Santa Ana woolly-star (Eriastrum densifolium) and the Slender-horned spineflower (Dodecahema lepto- ceras) may be found on site as potential habitat is present. As of date, 4/5/92, the TT14475 site has not been surveyed in the spring, which is when these state and federally endangered species may be found. comments, TT14475 page 4 Raptor presence and use is high on this project site. It is unknown if any nest on site , due to lack of sufficent surveys. The Golden Eagle, Merlin, Sharp-shinned hawk, Red-shouldered, Red-tailed, and Cooper's hawks have all been sited and use the project site for foraging The Merlin is believed to use this area for wintering grounds. Any further development in this area would adversely effect all aforementioned Raptors. The Golden Eagle is fully protected under the Endangered Species Act. The TT14475 fails to recognize the Golden Eagle in its biological assessments. The California gnatcatcher is a State and Federally recognized C-2 species that is presently awaiting listing as a Endangered Species. Historically and currently the California gnatcatcher occurs on the project site (see Dr.Atwood's Status Review 1990). LSA biological assessment for portions of Etiwanda, 1987, indicates that a California gnatcatcher was observed on site, the most recent siting of a California gnatcatcher was in 1991, by Doug Willitt, at the confluence of Lytle Creek and the Cajon Wash, very similar habitat of that of the TT14475 project site. In research, San Bernardino Sage Friends and I have found that there have been no indepth Spring surveys for the California gnatcatcher on the project site and regionally. We recommend Spring surveys for the California gnatcatcher obtained by NCCP Scientific Review Panel Guidelines. If Bauer Environmental Services do not have these guidelines,please let us know and we will furnish them for you. Other species of concern to us include, the San Diego horned lizard, arroyo toad, western spadefoot toad, western pond turtle, California red-sided garter snake, rosey boa, patch-nosed snake, orange-throated whiptail,western whiptail, black-tailed jackrabbit, grasshopper mouse,pocket mouse and the skink. RECOMMENDATION OF REVISIONS & AMMENDMENT MEASURES FOR TT14475 PROJECT IMPACTS AND MITIGATIONS - 1. Indepth Spring biological surveys on foot with assessments ammended to'Appendix C, prior to vesting and EIR certification and project approval. 2. Appendix C, revisions and ammendments should include and indicate C-2, sensitive, threatened and endangered species of concern as to date, 1992. 3. Review and comments by the California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) and United States Fish and Wildlife Service to be included in the TT14475 Vesting and Environmental Assessment- comments, TT14475 page 5 4. Recommendation that TT14475 concur with CDFG in regards to Biological Resources, Mitigation Measures for Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub, a 2:1 ratio for inkind habitat. TT14475 presently fails to mitigate for the loss of alluvial fan sage scrub, its unique and rare habitat and communities, falling short of CEQA requirements. Recommendation that the Cucamonga Wash buffer of 150 ft., chain linked fence and wildlife education posting, shall be in place prior to any grading on site. To prevent any accidental dumping into Cucamonga Wash. 6. Present, Biological Mitigation Measure #2. is not acceptable and provides a "way out" in protection of Native Oak Trees. We recommend revisions in the present wording of this mitigation to eliminate" attempt to", and the last sentence" If Native Oak trees are removed as a result of site preparation, they · shall be replaced by boxed specimens in compatible areas to be selected by a qualified expert". We recommend that all Native Oak Trees on site and site foot- print , be fully protected. Prior to any grading, all Native Oak Trees will be enclosed by a chain linked fence with a setback, buffer to accommmodate root length in tree heigth. Example - Tree is 25 ft. in heigth, buffer is 25ft. out to root length. This may prevent any accidental root and tree damage by doz~r 8. All NativeITrees are to be monitored by a qualified ecologist/expert in conjunction with USFWS and or CDFG Natural Heritage consultations. 7. All Open Space (OS) shall be dedicated as NATURAL Open Space. 8. Recommendation that, No Hydrological, flood control measures, diversions and channelization, that will directly or indirectly effect the alluvial fan sage scrub communities that depends on the present natural hydrological system. 9. We recommend that TT14475 storm drain flow directly into the Almond Interceptor Channel and not Cucamonga Creek, in order to avoid toxic petrochemical and herbicide run off into a significant ecological area. The toxic run off would have a direct impact on Biological Resources. We recommend consult- ation with CDFG and USFWS. 10. Concerning Archeological Resources, we recommend tha~ a SOPA Archeologist and Gabrielino person be on project site during all grading and earth movement activity. We recommend that any and all Native American artifacts be recorded and returned comments, TT14475 page 6 to the appropriate Gabrielino representative. All monitoring and mitigations are to comply with procedures outlined by The Native American Heritage Society. ll.We recommend that Cultural Resources, be ammended and included in the project EIR and Mitigations. Cultural Resources are to include Historical to present day significant use of the project site and surrounding region by the Gabrielino people. The Gabrielino people continue to use this area for spiritual renewal and gather regional plants for healing and ceremonial purposes. We recommend comment to include the Gabrielino religious practices and the mythology of Cucamonga Peak and Mt. Baldy. We recommend that the ethnobotany of the Gabrielino be included in Cultural Resources and that Mitigation MeaSures shall be persued and reflect the Cultural Impact as Very Significant. 12. Solid Waste is significant. Regional landfills are expected ..to close within the next five years. The TT14475 fails to disclose this significant and substancial evidence of Solid Waste Impacts. We recommend that mitigation measures to include curb side recycling and monitoring of this mitigation by lead agencies. In closing, San Bernardino Sage Friends and I, encourage Bauer Environmental Services, The City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Commission and City Council to continue to work on long-range planning procedures that encompass preservation of the alluvial fan ecosystem. At this time we can not endorse or approve of TT14475 proposed project, vesting and environmental assessments. We recommend the most Environmentally Superior Alternative which is 5.1 "No Project Alternative. Project Impacts are Very Significant with Mitigation Measuresrinadequate. EIR Assessments fail to sufficently disclose substantial biological evidence that would indicate non compliance to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission, Recital A(iii) "all legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred." TT14475 does not comply with Resolution, B, 3(c) "The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; and (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substancial environmental damage and avoid- able injur7 to humans and wildlife or their habitat; and (4) This Commission hereby finds and certifies that tha project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the CEQA of 1970 and, further, this Commission has certified the adequacy of the Subse- quent Environmental Impact Report for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 14475. comments, TT14475 page 7 Thank you for this time to comment, if we can be of any further assistance please call me at (818) 398-4962. Sincerely, San Bernardino Sage Friends, Leeona Klippstein, coordinator cc; Mayor Stout and Rancho Cucamonga City Council John Hanlon, United States Fish & Wildlife Service Glen Black, Regional Director, CDFG - Natural Heritage Dan Silver, Endangered Habitats League Dr. Dennis Murphy, Chairman, Scientific Review Panel/NCCP Brad Bullet & Rancho Cucamonga Planning. Commission ;,TATE ~ CALIFORNIA--THE RESOURCES AGEN~ PETE WILSON, Go~rnor , DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME e 330 Golden Shore, Suite 50 Long Beach, CA 90802 (310) 590-5113 April l, ~992 City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Dear Council Mend3ers: Etiwanda North Specific Plan Final Environmental Impact Report, SCH89123~4 The Department of Fish and Game (Department) has reviewed the draft Final EIR for the Etiwanda North Specific Plan. The project is a general plan amendment and prezoning of approximately 6,840 acres prior to annexation of territory in the Rancho Cucamonga Sphere of Influence. The Plan area provides 3,6~3 single-family dwelling units on 2,473 acres of vacant land, 28 acres of neighborhood commercial use, 4 schools, 5 parks, an equestrian center and preservation of 4,~2 acres of open space generally located north of Highland Avenue, south of the San Bernardino National Forest, west of the City of Fontana, and east of Milliken Avenue. Approximately one half of the area is a gently-sloping alluvial fan which includes Day Creek Wash, Etiwanda Creek Wash, and San Sevaine Wash areas, supporting Riversidean Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub end riparian vegetation. The Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub habitat was once widely distributed along the southern outwashes of the San Gabriel and. San Bernardino mountains, but has now become confined to remnant patches along unaltered streams and outwashes, as residential and flood control projects have eliminated it from most of its former range. The Department of Fish and Game recognizes that planning for the l~iwanda North area is · oomp~ex cha~lenge~ and we commend the tit of Rancho Cucamonga~s effort to address · wide range o~ land uses inuluding Leeignition of open space reserves. However, the DFG is still concerned about the loss of habitat values that will result from urbanization under scenarious outlined in the planning documents and the lack of commitment by the City for preservation of alluvial fan sage scrub habitat. Our concerns about specific mitigation measures put forth in this document are as follows: Mitigation measure #~2 states that native "bramble" vegetation would be used to restrict public access into wildlife preservation areas. There is no native "bramble" in this type of plant community. Bramble vegetation is likely to eithernot grow at all due to ~ravelly, dry soil conditions, or it may become invasLve and spread. The springs and bog are· are particularly vulnerable to beLng taken over by invasive plants, and this must be avoided. . Laurel sumac (RrUs laurina) would be a more appropriate local native which currently grows onsite, is an evergreen, and grows fairly rapidly. Batcharia could also be interplanted with laurel sumac. Mitigatior Measure #~6 needs to indicate that applicants shall obtain agreements with the Department under Fish and Game Code 1600 for all streams and not just these designated as waters of the United States. City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga April 1, 1992 Page Two Because Riversidean Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub constitutes a Significant Natural Community and has become one of the rarest habitats in the state, the Department still contends that compensation for loss of this habitat should reflect a replacement ratio of 2:1 for inkind habitat, and not the 1:1 ratio identified in Mitigation Measure #20. The Department requests that this measure's language be deleted which says that our previous recommendations for preservation of sage scrub habitat was for that habitat "which can feasibly be retained"- This statement is in error. Mitigation measure #21 would require resurveying a portion of the project area for endangered species prior to the issuance of grading permits. The Department contends that the Final EIR and the LSA Associate Biological Assessment referenced in the document do not adequately address baseline biological values for the area in relation to sensitive plants and animals. This lack of biological information makes it impossible to assess and mitigate for biological impacts that have not been adequately ide~tified. The i an California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).in section 15125 requ res that EIR include special emphasis on environmental resources that are rare or unique to the region. The Department is concerned about biological surveys being conducted just prior to grading permits being issued. In the Department's view this is too late for identifying biological impacts'and ~or acquiring site specific mitigation measures. Therefore, the Department recommends the following changes be made to mitigation measure #21~ that individual project proponents be required to complete focused EIR's in which detailed biological survey information is obtained for all sensitive and threatened and endangered species within their projects footprint as well as to contributing to surveys for the entire'alluvial fan sage scrub area covered by the Etiwanda North Specific Plan. In our letter to you of June 26, 1991 on the Draft EIR for this project, the Department recommended preservation of Day Creek Wash,.San Sevaine Wash end Etiwanda Creek Wash drainage, and those alluvial fan sage scrub lands north of the utility corridor. However, mitigation measure #30 in the document only indicates that a study should be undertaken. The Department's policy is that studieS are not considered mitigation for the adverse environmental impacts of a project. Rather, in this case, a commitment by the City to preserve habftat north of the utility corridor would be acceptable as mitigation for this plan. Based upon the Department~s concerns about this plan, as previously stated in this letter, we have no choice but to recommend against the adoption and certification of this document by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. However, there currently exists an opportunity for resolution of these issues. Governor Wilson recently signed into law the Natural Community Conservation Planning (NCCP) Act of 1991 which promotes the voluntary cooperation of state, federal, and local agencies and jurisdictions and private landowners in preserving natural areas that are largs enough to support viable populations of the states flora and fauna while allowing for a13propriate economic development- The state has selected the coastal sage scrub plant and animal community of southern California for a first attempt to implement this law. The Conservation Planning Area for this effort includes northern San Bernardino County and specifically those areas hhat still contain alluvial fan sage scrub, including Rancho Cucamonga. City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga April l, 1992 Page Three Your city, along with numerous other local jurisdictions, has recently received a letter and an enrollment form from the State of California, Resources Agency that asked you ~o participate in this NCCP program. The Department of Fish and Game asks that you seriously consider this invitation as a mechanism to work cooperatively with us, the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service and your neighboring jurisdictions, developers and conservation interests to address and hopefully .resolve alluvial fan sage scrub protection issues on a broad scale. Thank you for this opportunity to comment on this plan. The Department of Fish and Game looks forward to the opportunity to work with the City of Rancho Cucamonga and others to resolve these issues. Questions about this letter and further coordination on these issues should be directed to Glenn Black, Natural Heritage Supervisor at (3~0) 590-4807. Sincerely, Region 5 cc: Mr. John Hanlon, USFWS-Carlsbad Ms. Leona Klippstein, San Bernardino Sage Friends United States Department of the Interior FISH AN'I) WILDLIFE SER~,qCE , FISH AND WILDLIFE ENHANCEMENT i · SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA FIELD STATION Laguna Niguel Office Federal Building, 24000 Avila Road Laguna Niguel ,' California 92656 March 13, 1992 Supervisor Jon Michaels County of San Bernardino 385 N. Arrowhead Avenue San Bernardino, California 92415-1080 Re: Alluvial Scrub Habitat Dear Mr. Michaels: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) is very concerned about the rapid loss of alluvial scrub habitat in southern California. Alluvial scrub is a type of coastal sage scrub. Alluvial scrub habitat is only found along the coastal draining slopes of the San Gabriel and San Bernardino Mountains. It is estimated that only 5% of this habitat remains. As you may know, this loss is the result of residential and commercial development, water diversions, and flood control structure~. Alluvial scrub habitat is a unique assemblage of plants and animals based on the d)mamic nature of alluvial systems and soil deposition. This ecosystem is also very important for natural groundwater recharge at no cost to man. -This habitat also serves as natural flood control ~hrough the extension of sheet flow out over a wide area that allows for percolation into the ground. Alluvial scrub habitat to be a high priority habitat for conservation. The California Department of Fish and Game and the Service consider. As you know, there is no comprehensive development plan to protect the functions and dynamic nature of this habitat in San Bernardino County. Every development proposal is viewed separate from all others. This creates a patchwork of habitat fragments that will no longer function biologically. Flood control measures and structures remove the hydrology and debris flow that is essential to the maintenance of this habitat. Considerable interest has developed regarding the protection of biologically functioning alluvial scrub habitat. This interest was heightened by the proposed Los Angeles Raiders stadium in Irwindale that would have eliminated 178 acres to create a parking lot; the proposed golf course in Big Tujunga Wash that would eliminate 350 acres; and the proposed flood control projects in Etiwanda and San Sevaine Washes that would have eliminated the remaining alluvial scrub habitat within their drainage areas. In addition, the area's many individual residential developments either proposed, planned, or under construction in San Bernardino County will eliminate significant acreage. Jon Michaels 2 On February 14, 1992, an educational forum was held in Rancho Cucamonga regarding alluvial scrub ecosystems. It was well artended. The purpose was to bring together planning department personnel from all levels of government to network and plan development to protect the remaining alluvial scrub habitat. Also, the City of Rancho Cucamongo prepared the Etiwanda North Specific Plan within their sphere of influence in an attempt to protect some of the remaining alluvial scrub. However, it does not go far enough. To date, the County of San Bernardino has not acknowledged this effort nor its intent. The Service suggests that the County of San Bernardino Planning Department consider the remaining alluvial scrub habitat within their Jurisdiction of high priority for protection and possibly develop a special planning district. The environmental constraints should be identified first and any develcpment that would not impact these constraints could be considered. The Service is committed to the protection of the remaining acreage of this rapidly declining unique ecosystem and asks for your cooperative effort via the planning process. We look forward to hearing your views and working together to avoid further loss of this habitat. If you have any questions please feel free to contact John Hanlon at (714) 643-4270. Sincerely, Brooks Hatper Office Supervisor cc: CDFG, Region 5, Long Beach, CA (Attn: B. Elliason) CDFG, Region. 5, Long Beach, CA (Attn: M. Guisti) CDFG, Region 5, Long Beach, CA (At~n: M. Meyer) City of Rancho Cucamonga, CA (Attn: B. Buller) City of Rancho Cucamonga, CA (Attn: M. Bratt) Supervisor Larr~ Walker Supervisor Marsha Puroci Supervisor Barbara Riotdan Supervisor Robert Hnmmock San Bernerdino Sage Friends (Attn: L. Klippstein) The Nature Conservancy (Attn: R. Cox) San Bernardino County Planning Department (Attn: R. Scott) CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 8, 1992 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Co~nission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Scott Murphy, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 14475 - SAHAMA INVESTMENTS - A public hearing to comment on the subsequent Environmental Impact Report prepared for Vesting Tentative Tract 14475, a residential subdivision and design review of 71 single family residences on 113 acres of land in the Hillside Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per acre ) and Open Space Districts, located north of Almond Avenue between Sapphire and Turquoise - APN: 200-051-07, 55, 56, AND 57. Staff recommends certification of the Environmental Impact Report. BACKGROUND: Following the submittal of Vesting Tentative Tract 14475, the City determined that an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was necessary to address adverse environmental impacts which may be created by the project- Working with Bauer Environmental Services, a scope of services was prepared outlining the contents of the EIR which was approved by the Planning Commission. Following approval of the scope of services, preparation of the draft EIR commenced and notices were sent to all affected agencies notifying them that the report was being prepared and inviting comments on areas for inclusion. After receiving comments from the agencies and the property owners, the draft EIR was circulate~ for public review and comment for 45 days. During this time interested parties provided written and oral comments about the EIR. The Planning Commission reviewed the EIR and received comments during the public hearings conducted on June 12 and September 11, 1991. These comments have been incorporated into the final draft EIR. PROJECT IMPACTS AND MITIGATIONS: Through comments received, site inspections, and project reviews, a number of potential impacts have been identified in the EIR. These impacts include alteration of land form, geology, hydrology, archaeological resources, biological resources, land use, relevant planning, traffic, and public services and utilities (see Executive Summary on pages 7-13 of the EIR). Once they were identified, each impact was evaluated to determine whether appropriate mitigations were available to reduce or eliminate the impacts- Where possible, the mitigations have been incorporated into the development plans. Other mitigations will be included as conditions of approval. ITEM F PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT EIR FOR VTT 14475 - SAHAMA April 8, 1992 Page 2 One of the impacts of greatest concern has been fire protection. The site is located in a high fire hazard area and, as a result, Phase 1 of a Wildland Fire Study (WFS) was prepared for the project. The WFS establishes general mitigation measures that must be incorporated into the project in order to reduce the fire hazard impact to a less-than- significant level and allow development to occur (see Appendix D of the EIR). A more detailed analysis will be conducted with Phase II of the WFS prior to recordation of the Final Tract Map. ALTERNATIVES: One of the key elements of any EIR is the discussion of a possible range of alternatives to the project. The EIR outlines four alternatives (see pages 52-54 of the EIR) to the proposal submitted, with particular emphasis on minimizing grading impacts- Study "A" is a cluster development with lots averaging 0-77 acres (33,541 square feet). Study "B" is =also a cluster development with slightly smaller lots than Study "A" averaging 0-67 acres (29,185 square feet). Both Study "A" and "B" included 73 lots which was consistent with the number of lots proposed by the applicant. Study "C" proposes the development of 25 estate lots averaging 3.23 acres. Finally the EIR analyzes the "No Project" Alternative- The pros and cons of each alternative are discussed at length in the EIR- The Design Review Committee (McNiel, Melcher, Coleman) considered the project alternatives during the initial review of the project. The Committee noted that the proposed project and all alternatives would occupy the entire lower mesa because of the flatter slope of the lower mesa, and the General Plan and Hillside policies to develop in the less steep areas. The Committee also noted that the alternatives would have to be revised to provide secondary access consistent with City policy- This could require additional streets to be provided across open space lots, further fragmenting the open space. The Committee felt that the proposal might be acceptable if larger lots were provided at the northeast corner of the site. Also, the lot size proposed was consistent with the lots to the south and would provide an adequate transition to the foothills and National Forest. As a result, the project design has been revised to address the Design Review Committee's comments and the issues raised in the EIR- MITIGATION MONITORING: In addition to identifying the potential impacts and the recommended mitigation measures, the EIR also contains a comprehensive mitigation implementation and monitoring program as required by state law (see Section 8 starting on page 57)- The mitigation implementation monitoring program identifies the particular mitigation measures, who is responsible for implementation, and the timing for completion or implementation of the measures. This monitoring program offers a check and balance system to ensure that the mitigation measures are implemented in conjunction with development of the project- PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT EIR FOR VTT 14475 - SAHAMA April 8, 1992 Page 3 As outlined in the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the purpose of this public hearing is to determine if the EIR is adequate for certification- More specifically, the hearing should focus on whether the environmental issues have been identified and if appropriate and adequate mitigations have been included to minimize and/or eliminate potential adverse impacts connected with the project. If the Planning Commission determines that the Environmental Impact Report is adequate for certification, the EIR document will be used in reviewing the proposed tract. If the project is approved, all mitigation measures outlined in the EIR will become part of the Conditions of Approval for the development. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, notices were sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the site, and the site was posted. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission certify the adequacy of Subsequent Environmental Impact Report for Vesting Tentative Tract 14475 through adoption of the attached Resolution. Respec lly subm' ed, er BB:SM:Sp Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (dated August 1991) (Commission copies only) Resolution of Approval RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF R/4NCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING THE FINAL SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 14475, A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF 71 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS ON 113 ACRES OF LAND IN THE HILLSIDE RESIDENTIAL (LESS THAN 2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) AND OPEN SPACE DISTRICTS, LOCATED NORTH OF ALMOND AVEN~E BETWEEN SAPPHIRE AND TURQUOISE STREETS, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 200-051-07, 55, 56, AND 57. A. Recitals. (i) A Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report has been presented to this Commission in conjunction with the Commission's consideration of approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map 14475. (ii) The Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report referred to in this Resolution consists of that document (dated August 1991, and entitled "Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report for Proposed Tentative Tract No. 14475"), written comments on the draft report, written responses thereto submitted by the staff and consultant of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and testimony presented during hearings of the Planning Commission (conducted on June 12 and September 11, 1991) on the approval of said Tentative Tract Map insofar as that testimony pertained to environmental matters. The entirety of the Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report is incorporated in this Resolution by this reference. (iii) On April 8, 1992, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing concerning the Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report and said public hearing was concluded prior to the adoption of this resolution. (iv) All legal prerequisites have occurred prior to the adoption of this Resolution. B. Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report has been prepared on the Vesting Tentative Tract 14475 in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act, California Public Resources Code Sections 21000 et seq. and in accordance with the regulations promulgated thereunder. Further, that this Commission certifies that it has considered the contents of the PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. EIR FOR VTT 14475 - SAHAMA Page 2 April 8, 1992 Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report in considering the approval of Vesting Tentative Tract 14475. 3. This Commission hereby finds that the Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report does identify physical environmental impacts inherent in the project and that changes or conditions have been incorporated in the project which mitigate or avoid all significant environmental effects thereof. 4. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF APRIL, 1992 . PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST- Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of April 1992 , by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. ~/~7'~ ~7~'S VTT 14475 - SAHAMA INVESTMENTS April 8, 1992 J~ad~d,,~/< A~ ~5~,vx~-xy~ Page 8 27) Curb adjacent sidewalks shall be provided on one side of the following streets as indicated. The 5- and 7-foot parkway widths indicated in Condition No. 19 shall be increased to 6.5 and 8.5 feet, respectively, where a sidewalk is required. a) The north side of Crestview b) The west side of Skyline, north of Street c) The east side of Street "A" d) The south side of Street "B" e) The east side of Street "F" h) The west side of Street "G" g) The north side of Street 28) Property lane adjacent sidewalks shall be provided on one side of the following streets as indicated: a) T~e south side of Street "D" b) The north side of Street "E" c) The west side of Skyline, south of Street "E" APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF APRIL 1992. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of April 1992, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. VTT 14475 - SAHAMA INVESTMENTS April 8, 1992 Page 8 26) Curb adjacent sidewalks shall be provided on one side of the following streets as indicated. The 5- and 7-foot parkway widths indicated in Condition No. 19 shall be increased to 6.5 and 8.5 feet, respectively, where a sidewalk is required. a) The north side of Crestview b) The west side of Skyline, north of.Street c) The east side of Street "A" d) The south side of Street e) The east side of Street h) The west side of Street "G" g) The north side of Street "H" 27) Property line adjacent sidewalks shall be provided on one side of the following streets as indicated: a) The south side of Street "D" b) The north side of Street "E" ~ c) The west side of Skyline, south of Street "E" APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF APRIL 1992. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of April 1992, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 8, 1992 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Scott Murphy, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 14475 - SAHAMA INVESTMENTS - A residential subdivision and design review of 71 single family residences on 113 acres of land in the Hillside Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per acre) and Open Space Districts, located north of Almond Avenue between Sapphire and Turquoise Streets - APN: 200-051-07, 55, 56, and 57. Associated with this application is Tree Removal Permit No. 92-06. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map, Site Plan, Conceptual Grading Plan, and Building Elevations. B. Pro~ect Density: 0.6 dwelling units per gross acre 1.23 dwelling units buildable acre C. Surroundinq Land Use and Zoninq: North - San Bernardino National Forest; County of San Bernardino South - Single Family Residential under construction and vacant; Hillside Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per acre) East - Vacant; County of San Bernardino West - Vacant; County of San Bernardino D. General Plan Des~anations: Project Site - Very Low Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per acre) and Open Space North - County of San Bernardino South - Very Low Residential East - Very Low Residential and Open Space West - County of San Bernardino E. Site Characteristics: A detailed description of the site is contained in the related Environmental Impact Report. The site is located in the northwest corner of the city and is the last developable parcel before entering the San Bernardino National Forest. The property slopes to the south/southwest, as evidenced by the on-site elevations that range from a high 2,910 feet in the northeastern corner to a minimum of 2,160 feet in the southwestern corner. Cucamonga Wash is a significant drainage area running north-south through the western portion of the site that represents a major landform feature. The bottom of the Cucamonga Wash is approximately 150 feet below the top banks. The canyon walls are nearly vertical. ITEm4 G PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT VTT 14475 - SAHAMA INVESTMENTS April 8, 1992 Page 2 Another distinctive feature of the site is the escarpment that runs through from north to south through the project. It is likely that activity on the Cucamonga Fault, a portion of which has been identified within the project site, created the escarpment dividing the site into a lower and upper mesa. Prevailing slopes on the lower mesa range from 6 to 10 percent between the top of the Cucamonga wash walls and the escarpment. East of the escarpment, on the upper mesa, the slopes range from 10 to 30 percent with slopes approaching 100 percent at the site's northeast corner. The area north of the project site is located within the San Bernardino National Forest. Access to the National Forest is maintained across the existing paved Big Tree Road located along the eastern project boundary. ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicant is proposing 71 single family lots averaging 0.86 acres (exclusive of streets and community trails). Twenty five of the lots will be located within the lower mesa and 46 lots will be located within the upper mesa. A street will be provided which bisects the escarpment in order to connect the upper and lower mesas. As a Vesting Tentative Tract Map, the applicant is also proposing the product 'type for the project. The applicant is proposing 5 floor plans ranging in size from 3,450 to 4,650 square feet in area. Each floorplan has two different building elevations. Building materials used on the units will consist primarily of stucco with stone (i.e. river rock, flagstone, etc.), and concrete tile roofs. Colors proposed for all building materials are oriented towards earth tones in order to blend in with the natural environment as much as possible. Bright colors and glazed roof tile have been avoided. A series of lettered lots have also been provided within the development. These lots will set aside such items as natural open space areas, private streets (if approved), water reservoir sites, earthquake fault locations, and drainage areas. With the exception of those areas dedicated to public entities, maintenance of the open space lots will be conducted through the homeowners' association for the project. B. Desiqn Review Committee: This project has been reviewed by the Design Review Committee seven times over the past nine months. The direction of the Design Review Committee during these reviews has included the following: 1. The customizing of the units/floorplans to fit the lot constraints (grading, views, orientation). 2. Reduction of the building mass - this includes the use of second floor steps consistent with the first floor, one-story elements at the front elevation (particularly on up-hill lots), the use of slighter roof pitches on corner lots and adjacent to existing developments. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT VTT 14475 - SAHAMA INVESTMENTS April 8, 1992 Page 3 3. The use of native/indigenous materials for use on exterior building elevations - the use of stucco and rock should be expanded while the use of brick and siding should be minimized. 4. Variations in site plan to minimize the location of units within the steep portions of the northeast corner of the site. Following the various Design Review Committee meetings, the applicant has provided revised plans to address the Committee's concerns. As a result, many of the issues/concerns raised during the Design Review Committee meetings have been addressed in the revised plans. There are, however, a couple of items which have not been incorporated. These items include the following: 1. Native landscape materials should be used, where possible, on all slopes to be 1..andscaped. The plant species should be coordinated with any requirements of the Wildland Fire Study prepared for the project. 2. The retaining wall along the water tank access road should be treated to blend in with the natural area. 3. The applicant should continue to work with staff on further refinements to the grading plan to create a more natural and less manufactured appearance. 4. To accommodate the Community Trail on the north side of Street "C", three 5-foot retaining walls, with decorative finish, should be used to take up the grade. While the existing grade in this area is approximately 2: 1, the Committee felt that the retaining wall approach would be more desirable than grading a 2: 1 slope. The Committee felt that a graded slope would never appear natural. Because these items have not been addressed in the revised plans, appropriate conditions of approval have been provided in the Design Review Resolution. C. Technical Review Committee: During the various technical reviews of the project, there remains two major items of contention - the streets within the project should be public and the tentative map should be revised to dedicate trails and streets consistent 'with City policy and requirements. While efforts have been made to address these issues, the following comments should be considered by the Planning Commission: 1. public versus Private Streets: Over the past few years, much discussion has surrounded the use of private streets and their standards for construction. On January 22, 1990, the City Council adopted a policy requiring all streets, whether public or private, to be 36 feet in width (measured from curb to curb) and that no cul- de-sac should exceed 600 feet in length. This policy was established to minimize conflicts with emergency access that have occurred in other projects within the City. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT VTT 14475 - SAHAMA INVESTMENTS April 8, 1992 Page 4 The applicant is proposing to use private streets with a width of 36 feet from curb to curb within a 40 foot offer of dedication. While the Development Code does provide for the use of private streets, staff feels that public streets should be used for this project for the following reasons: a. Private Streets: Both the Development Code and the General Plan make provisions for the use of private streets within new developments. The policy of the General Plan suggests that the use of private streets should be limited to secured gated communities. While the developer would like to provide security gates for marketing purposes of the tract, no plans have been submitted indicating that gates will be installed. In addition, if gates are to be installed for the development, the existing public portion of Crestview Place (within Tract 10210 to the south), would need to be finished with a cul-de-sac bulb on Tract 14475 to provide a terminus of the public street and a transition to the private streets. By doing so, the existing portion of Crestview would be a cul-de-sac of approximately 1000 feet in length, well in excess of the 600 feet maximum established by the City Council policy. Additionally, the vacant land to the east of the project site, which has been master planned for an additional 28 lots, will only have one means of public access via Streets "D" and "E" to Skyline Road (See Exhibit "I"). b. Public Streets: If no gates are proposed for the development, the private streets would appear no different than any public street except for the parkway grading. With typical local streets, a 12-foot flat parkway is provided. Because of the hillside nature of the site, however, staff has agreed to some modifications to the standard parkway design. The flat portion of the parkway can be reduced from 12 feet to 7 feet along downhill lots and from 12 feet to 5 feet along uphill lots. This is consistent with the grading proposed for the development. As a result, no additional grading would be required for public streets. Regardless if private or public streets are used, staff recommends that a 60-foot wide offer of dedication be provided. This will allow utilities and street trees to be installed within the dedication as opposed to the cumbersome use of easements that would be necessary with a 40-foot wide dedication. In addition, should the homeowners association ever request the City to accept dedication of the streets, the dedication would be consistent with the standard right-of-way widths required by the City. Because staff does not know whether or not the Commission will allow the use of private streets, two Resolutions of Approval for the tract map have been prepared. The first Resolution allows for the use of private streets. The second Resolution requires the PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT VTT 14475 - SAHAMA INVESTMENTS April 8, 1992 Page 5 dedication of public streets. Again, staff recommends public streets for this project. 2. Tentative Tract Map: Through the various reviews on the project, the applicant has submitted a Vesting Tentative Tract Map that identifies the private streets and public Community Trails as easements over the proposed lots (See .Exhibit "B" - Vesting Tentative Tract Alternative "A"). Under this scenario, the lot lines will extend to the center of the street and across the trails. While this approach is allowed under the Subdivision Map Act, it is inconsistent with City policies and requirements. Staff has requested that Vesting Tentative Tract Map Alternative "B" (See Exhibit "C") be submitted. Alternative "B" will dedicate the Community Trails to the City, show the streets within an irrevocable offer of dedication to the City, deed remnant parcels as Open Space lots to the homeowners' association for maintenance, and dedicate Big Tree Road to the National Forest Service. This alternative is consistent with City policies and requirements and should be used as a basis of approving the project. Conditions contained within the Resolutions are related to Alternative "B". While the public street and tentative map design comprise the major issues connected with the project, there is one secondary issue which was also raised by the Technical Review Committee - the provision for sidewalks within the development. With previous projects in the rural/equestrian area, it has been the Planning Commission's policy to require sidewalks only on one side of the street. During the Design Reviews for the project, a suggestion was made by the Committee that sidewalks be eliminated within the project in order to provide a street section that is as unobtrusive as possible. As noted in the September 12, 1991, memo from the Traffic Engineer (See Exhibit "J"), sidewalks should be reinstated on at least one side of the primary street through the project for pedestrian safety because of the grades and curvature of the streets. If the Commission feels that sidewalks are appropriate within the development, they will be located adjacent to the curb (6 foot wide) with the slope on downhill lots beginning two feet behind the sidewalk. This will increase the flat parkway width to 8 1/2 feet along downhill lots and 6 1/2 feet along uphill lots. If, however, the Planning Commission feels that sidewalks need not be provided for the development, staff suggests that the existing sidewalk on Skyline Road (within Tract 10210 to the south) be extended up Skyline Road and on one side of Streets "D" and "E" to serve the future development to the east. The existing sidewalk on Crest View Place shall end at the entrance to the project site. D. Trails Advisory Committee: The Trails Advisory Committee has reviewed the application four times prior to the Planning Commission hearing. Through these various reviews, the Trails Committee has required the installation of a Community Trail around the perimeter of the project and local trails within the project to serve the various lots. The most PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT VTT 14475 - SAHAMA INVESTMENTS April 8, 1992 Page 6 recent review by the Trails Committee was conducted on February 19, 1992. At that time, the Committee noted that previous comments have been incorporated into the plan with exception of the following items which have been included as conditions of approval: 1. The Community Trail on the north side of Street "C" should be extended to Skyline Road. 2. The Community Trail on the west side of Lot 30 should be redssigned to eliminate slopes in excess of 15 percent. 3. The local trail between Lots 30 and 31 should be deleted. 4. The local trail between Lots 67 and 68 should be realigned to intersect Skyline Road at the intersection with Street "C". 5. The local trai~ on the north and east side of Lot 71 should be deleted. 6. The local trail across Lots "F" and 70 should be deleted. In order to provide access to the rear of Lot 70, an area should be graded on the north side of the garage of sufficient width to permit vehicle passage. 7. Water bars should be provided on all north-south trails to minimize erosion. E. Tree Removal Permit No. 92-06: In conjunction with the subdivision application, the applicant has submitted a Tree Removal Permit application requesting the removal of 34 Eucalyptus trees located along the base of the escarpment. Of the 34 trees, 13 are already dead, 17 are infected with the Eucalyptus borer beetle, and 3 are suffering from drought stress. In addition to the poor physical condition of the trees, the trees are located in line with street and Community Trail improvements. Based on the information provided, staff feels that the request is reasonable. Replacement planting will be required as a condition of approval. The two remaining Eucalyptus, located on the western portion of the lower mesa, will be preserved in place. Fencing will be provided around the trees prior to commencement of grading to protect the trees. F. Environmental Assessment: In completing the Environmental Assessment, staff noted that a previous Environmental Impact Report (EIR) had been prepared and certified for the subject site. In comparing the EIR with the current project, staff noted several changes in the Development Code that were not in place at the time of the previous EIR. As a result, staff required a subsequent EIR to be prepared for the site. (See Staff Report for Environmental Impact Report for Vesting Tentative Tract 14475 for complete information.) If the Planning Commission certifies the adequacy of the EIR, the environmental document should then be used in evaluating Vesting Tentative Tract 14475. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT VTT 14475 - SAHAMA INVESTMENTS April 8, 1992 Page 7 FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The project is consistent with the General Plan and the Development Code. The project, with the mitigation measures outlined in the Environmental Impact Report, will not be detrimental to the public health or safety, or cause nuisances or significant adverse environmental impacts. In addition, the proposed use and site plan, together with the recommended conditions of approval, are in compliance with the applicable provisions of the Development Code and City Standards. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper as a public hearing, the site was posted, and notices were sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the site. RECOMMENDATION: If the Planning Commission certifies the adequacy of the Environmental Impact Report, staff recommends that the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing on the proposed subdivision and design review. After concluding the public hearing, the Planning Commission should determine whether pri~ate or public street should be provided for the development and adopt the appropriate Resolution of Approval. Additionally, staff recommends that the Planning Commission approved the Design Review for Vesting Tentative Tract 14475 and Tree Removal Permit 92-06 through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval. ~~Resp lly s ted, _ BB:SM:js Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site Utilization Map Exhibit "B" - Tentative Tract Map Alternative "A" Exhibit "C" - Tentative Tract Map Alternative "B" Exhibit "D" - Site]Grading Plan Exhibit "E" - Building Elevations Exhibit "F" - Slope Analysis Map Exhibit "G" - Master Plan Exhibit "H" - General Plan Text Excerpt Exhibit "I" - Area Access Plan Exhibit "J" - Traffic Engineer Memo (dated September 12, 1991) Exhibit "K" - Tree Location Plan Exhibit "L" - Letter from Art Bridge Resolution of Approval for Tract Map (with private streets) Resolution of Approval for Tract Map (with public streets) Resolution of Approval for Design Review ~.,,< - · ._ -~., ' 19 ' - - -" ' ~o~ ' - '5. ',',. , ~- - , ..,, ,.- . j~,,' ,~ .... .~- ' L..~.-__~ I-- W ,J W I- Z RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION S.C:1/8'= 1'-0° i~ . ~ ~:..,--"""' '; " ~" ':"; : ' ,"'lq") · REAR ELEVATION LEFT SIDE ELEV A TION <Z~ ~ 37 RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION I;C:ltil'~l',Oo REAR ELEVATION LEFT SIDE ELEV A TION ,.,~'~ .,4/~_.,~/,/ RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION $C:1/8%1'-0' REAR ELEVATION LEFT SIDE ELEV A TION EIEIf"I ,t LEFT SIDE ELEVATION REAR ELEV A TION RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION · 0 LEFT SIDE ELEVATION IC: 1/1~,, 1 '-0' REAR ELEVATION RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION Private Street Standard.~. Pdvate streets may be desirable in new developments where they would enhance neighborhood identification, provide forcontrol of access and where special overall design concepts may be involved. To insure that these street designs are co nstructed in a manner which will not create emergency access traffic hazards or future maintenance problems the following standards should be applied in approvals: - The use of pdvate streets should be limited to secured secudty gated communities. Private streets should be permitted only ... where a means satisfactory to the City Council is provided for their maintenance and operation with an irrevocable offer of dedication. - The design of all pdvate streets shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer; and the construction inspected by the Engineering Division, with a standard improvement inspection fee. ill- 27 ,T' OF ~' ,~,~"FC{:.":~"UCAMONGA ITEM: VTT PLANNING-DMSION TITLE:6ENER/IL EXHIBIT: ,//' SCALE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ,- MEMOI{ANDUM DATE: Saptember 12, 1991 TO: Scott Murphy, Associate Planner FROM: Paul A. Rougeau, Traffic EngineerZ]~/~TM SUBJECT: DRC meeting of September 19, 1991 - SAHAMA INV. This project is being reconsidered by the DRC at this meeting, and it has been noted that the Committee recommended elimination of sidewalks on all streets at its meeting in June. It is strongly recommended that a sidewalk be re-tnstated on at least one side of the primary street through the project for pedestrian safety. In this development~ grade and curvature of the streets subject pedestrians to more exposure to traffic than normal. It iS imperative that pedestrians be provided a safe refuge from through traffic on the public streets. The lower part of this subdivision will provi'de access to the National Forest and will carry considerable outside traffic. Please stress to the Comnittee that ~edestrian safety should always be considered an essential feature of any residential area. Such a consideration should be a part of this project. PAR: s d cc: Joe 0'Nell Betty Mt l 1 er CITY OF ~'C}I'0~T:~UCANIONGA ITEM: V 7-r / it V PLANLVI'NG- D~SION TITLE: ft.~ _lLFldllll~ P~a_JsRN EXHIBIT: t./t SCALE: c~TY OF, '~O CUCAMONGA PLANNING DIVISION APR 0 1 1992 A thur idge 87!5 B,nyan Street 71819i 1H1 111 i%41 i A!ta Loma~ California 91701 April I, !998 Larry McNeil~ Chairman Planning Commission City of Rancho Cucamonga Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 RE: TT 14475: Sahama Investments, Inc. Dear Mr. McNeil and Members of the Commission, Sahama Investments {TT 14475) is expected to come before the Planning Com- mission on April 8, 1998 for a hearing to consider action on its Environmental Impact Report. it is stated that the Planning Staff recommends approval of this EIR. It is reported that this certification will be granted on grounds of in- vestment of time and money in the process so far. If this approval indeed takes place, we as owners of the property directly south of this pro~ect, wish to suggest several design considerations: I. The equestrian trail on the southern boundary of the pro3ect site is elevated to some degree above our property on the south. This elevation will infringe on the privacy of future property owners on the south, even if future development there provides for a six foot wall along the northern perimeter. Suitable irregated landscaping outside the trail fencing would help to mitigate this problem. In addition, an open view of the backyards of Lots I to 5 from future home owners on the south is far from desirable. Homeowners on these lots can be pected to erect a variety of walls and barriers north of the trail fencing. Could this become the eyesore experienced in other locations? For large, expen- sive homes such as these are pro~ected to be, would not a meandering trail, walled on the north and andstaped on both sides be a true amenity to the entire tract? 8. A dirt utility road continues north from the Cucamonga County Water District reservoir 5A (~ust north of the western terminus of Almond Street) to. the southeast corner of TT 1~475 (at Lot 5). This has been used in recent years by both dirt bikers and horse riders. A strong barrier should be estab- lished at this point to prevent trespassing down this road from the eques~ciar. trail. Perhaps CCWD should be consulted on this point. 3. The drainage from Lots 17 to 5 flows directly down a pipe into the gucamonga Wash ~ust above this point within TT 144~5. Adequate safecuards should be provided at this point to protect children~ {adults?), animals. r:.cks, trash, etc. from dropping down the pipe to the floor of the Wash. 4. The "Seismic Exclusion Zone" (p80) shows an earthquake fault ~,-s~m east to west which ends at Lot D. <Does it go undergroundT) A geological st~,d~ by Moore and Tabor for the property to the south shows this same fa.~l~ however, it does not end. Rather, the fault line continues in a straight i~e to the south west, through .Lots 83~ 88~ 81, 5, and 6 and across the -~, corner of the ~outhern property. The Moore & Tabor study included sies~.c soundings while the Sahama study used only trenching. In addition, Moore anO Tuber identified these faults during a seismological study for the Cucamonga County Water District and again by a subsequent study for ourselves. As a mat- ter of the safety of future home owners of those lots, should not this dis- crepancy be seriously analyzed? 5. As the US Forest Service letter suggested, street lights and lights in open spaces should be adequately screened not only within the tract but also from surrounding properties. 6. Stru~tu~-es should take advantage of the outstanding view both to the north and to the south. Buildings should be planned to avoid obstructing this view, not only within the property but also to surrounding properties. We ap- preciate the fact that the heights of the homes has been reduced to twenty- eight feet. ?.- The homeowners~ association agreements should make strong provisions for high quality trail and open space maintenance and for continuous fire protection practices. The response time for the Fire District is stated to be seven minutes. In high wind periods, the District could be too busy. Perhaps internal fire protection measures could be included in the homeowners agree- ments. ' TT 14475 is in an exceptionally beautiful location. The architectural designs are for spacious and expensive homes. This site promises to be a choice place to live. It will be a nice tract and a nice neighborhood- On the other hand, it could be so much more -- a true ~ewel in the crown of Rancho Cucamonga. Each of the Planning Commissioners have become aware of our hopes for the twenty acre parcel to the south. Our original plans were for four lots of fi~e acres each. As we became aware of the increasing off-site im- provements we would be required to provide because of the traffic projections based on the de,?sity projections of two homes per acre, we had to increase den- sity on our plan to ten lots in order to cover the increased on and off-site ~equirements the City has added. Thus we have asked for a density of one home per two acres; we would prefer a ratio of one to three. We are extremely disappointed that the City has ~ot seen the opportunity in its master planning to plan and protect this extremely fragile and beautiful mesa. There are on going, expensive but laudable attempts to preserve the Ci. ty's historic homes. However, it is regretable that the rare opportunities for the c~eation of unique land use designs have n~t been pursued while they were possible. We hope the City in the near future will protect with higher standards the few remaining developable areas along the foothills in Rancno Cucamonga. Sincerely yours, Arthur H. Bridge Z% RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 14475, A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF 71 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS ON 113 ACRES OF LAND IN THE HILLSIDE RESIDENTIAL (LESS THAN 2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) AND OPEN SPACE DISTRICTS, LOCATED NORTH OF ALMOND AVENUE BETWEEN SAPPHIRE AND TURQUOISE STREETS, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 200-051-55, 56, and 57. A. Recitals. (i) Sahama Investments has filed an application for the Design Review of Vesting Tentative Tract No. 14475 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter, the subject Design Review request is referred to as "the application." (ii) On the 25th day of March 1992, and continued to the 8th day of April 1992, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said on April 8, 1992. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are~true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on March 25 and April 8, 1992, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located north of Almond Avenue, between Sapphire and Turquoise Streets, and the property is presently vacant. Big Tree Road, serving the San Bernardino National Forest, is located along the eastern tract boundary. (b) The property to the north is located within the San Bernardino National Forest and is vacant. The property to the south is designated for residential uses and is being developed for single family homes and is vacant. The property to the east, located within the County of San Bernardino, is designated by the City's General Plan for residential and open space uses and is presently vacant. The property along the western boundary includes the Cucamonga Wash which is designated as Open Space; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. VTT 14475 - SAHAMA INVESTMENTS April 8, 1992 Page 2 (c) The application contemplates the development of 71 single family residences on 58 buildable acres (as defined by the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code) which is consistent with the Hillside Residential designation of the Development Code and the Very Low Residential designation of the General Plan; and (d) The project, with the recommended conditions of approval, complies with all minimum development standards of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs i and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; and (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; and (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; and (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; and (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; and (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. (4) This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission has certified the adequacy of the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 14475. (5) Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planninq Division: i The final map shall be consistent with Vesting Tentative Tract Map 14475 Alternative "B" as shown on the attached Exhibit "A" and subject to additional conditions contained within this Resolution. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. VTT 14475 - SAHAMA INVESTMENTS April 8, 1992 Page 3 2) All applicable mitigation measures identified in Section 8 of the Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report shall be incorporated into the final plans. A copy of said mitigations are attached as Exhibit "B." 3) The Community Trail on the north side of Street "C" shall be extended to Skyline Road. 4} The Community Trail on the west side of Lot 30 shall be redesigned to eliminate slopes in excess of 15 percent. The final alignment shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner and City Engineer prior to the final map recordation. 5) The local trail between Lots 30 and 31 shall be deleted. 6) The local trail between Lots 67 and 68 shall be realigned to intersect Skyline Road at the intersection with Street "C." The final plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to final map recordation. 7) The local trail on the north and east side of Lot 71 shall be deleted. 8) The local trail across Lots F and 70 shall be deleted. 9) Prior to recordation of the final map, Phase II of the Wildland Fire Study shall be reviewed and approved by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District, the National Forest Service, and the City Planner. 10) Community Trail street crossings shall be constructed with the following items: a) Textured pavement, such as open graded asphalt or medium broom finish concrete, to prevent horses from slipping. b) Pavement markings and warning signs to alert motorists. c) Concrete aprons shall be of transverse medium broom finish. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. VTT 14475 - SAHAMA INVESTMENTS April 8, 1992 Page-4 11) Community Trail connections to streets shall be constructed with a vehicle gate with side step- through (see Standard Drawing #1006A). 12) Local Feeder trail connections to Community Trails shall be constructed with a step-through (see Standard Drawing #1007) across the full trail width and signs identifying the public Community Trail. 13) Tree Removal Permit No. 92-06 is approved subject to the following conditions: a) Those two trees identified by the arborist as worthy of preservation shall be ~preserved in place pursuant to Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Sec. 19.08.110. Chain link fencing shall be provided around the trees prior to the commencement of grading activity to protect the trees. b) The remaining 34 trees shall be removed and replaced on a one-for-one basis, in a size and species to the satisfaction of the City Planner, prior to occupancy release. 14) Pursuant to provisions of California Public Resources Code Section 21089(b), this application shall not be operative, vested, or final, nor will building permits be issued or a map recorded, until (1) the Notice of Determination (NOD) regarding the associated environmental action is filed and posted with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Bernardino~ and (2) any and all required filing fees assessed pursuant to California Fish and Game Code Section 711.4, together with any required handling charges, are paid to the County Clerk of the County of San Bernardino. The applicant shall provide the Planning Department with a stamped and conformed copy of the NOD together with a receipt showing that all fees have been paid. Enqineerinq Division: 1) All streets and storm drains within and required as conditions of approval for Tract 10210 shall be constructed, if not completed by others. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. VTT 14475 - SAHAMA INVESTMENTS April 8, 1992 Page 5 2) Extend the storm drain in Skyline Road from its terminus north of Inspiration Drive to north of Street "C" and provide a lateral within Streets "E" and "F" as determined by the Final Drainage Study. 3) The private drainage facility on Lot 43 shall be an open trapezoidal channel designed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and Building Official. Extend the storm drain in Streets "E" and "F" to connect with this facility. The transition from an open channel to a pipe shall occur outside of Lot H. Provide a trash rack where flows enter the pipe as well as adjacent to Big Tree Road. 4) Lot ~ shall be deeded to San Bernardino County Flood Control District (SBCFCD), or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 5) The storm drainage facility on Lots 4, 5, and A, which drains Crestview Place and the lots in the westerly portion of the tract, shall be designed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and SBCFCD as determined by the Final Drainage Study. IF SBCFCD refuses to accept the facility, the streets and drainage devices paralleling the community trails in the western portion of the tract shall be redesigned to direct flows south along Crestview Place. If necessary, the existing storm drain which " extends south of the Crestview/Almond intersection to the Almond intersection shall be extended and/or upsized to accommodate the additional flows. 6) The Developer shall record a Drainage Acceptance Agreement for all Community Trail runoff entering private drainage easements. 7) Concrete culverts shall be provided whenever private drainage crosses Community Trails. Provide parkway culverts whenever concentrated trail drainage enters streets. 8) Community Trails shall be dedicated to the City as follows: a) Standard 20-foot interior trails along the north and south tract boundaries, the east side of Lots A and C, and the west side of Lot J. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. VTT 14475 - SAHAMA INVESTMENTS April 8, 1992 Page 6 b) Twelve-foot parkway trails on the east side of Skyline Road south of Street "E," the south side'of Street "E," and the east side of Street "C;" and c) A 10-foot interior trail on the south and west sides, respectively, of Lots M and S, transitioning to 20 feet adjacent to Lot 43. 9) Private drainage devices adjacent to all Community Trails shall be located outside the public rights-of-way and maintained by the Homeowners Association, including the retaining wall and gutters shown in Section X-X. 10) Commdnity Trail grades shall not exceed 15 percent, except along the east tract boundary where accessibility for maintenance vehicles shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 11) Water bars shall be provided on all north-south Community Trails. 12) Provisions shall be made for maintenance vehicle access to the Community Trail from Skyline Road, Crestview Place, Street "C," and Street "E." 13) Intersections of local trails with perimeter Community Trails shall allow equestrian and pedestrian access, but not vehicles. 14) Community Trail fencing shall be located south and west of the retaining wall on Lots M and S, respectively. 15) Community Trail fencing on the east side of Skyline Road shall be located outside the intersection lines of sight for Street "D." 16) Driveway lines of sight shall be plotted on the Grading and Street Improvement Plans for driveways along the inside of the curve in Skyline Road and for Lot 1 on Crestview Place. Walls, slopes, and other obstructions shall be located outside the lines of sight. 17) All vertical curves for all streets shall have a stopping sight distance of 30 mph, minimum, or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. VTT 14475 - SAHAMA INVESTMENTS April 8, 1992 Page 7 18) The'tops and toes of slopes adjacent to streets shall be rounded to blend with the adjacent topography. 19) Provide a minimum flat parkway width of 5 feet, measured form the back of the curb, where lots slope up from the street and 7 feet where lots slope down from the street. Where both conditions exist on 'one side of a street, the 7 foot dimension shall be used in the vicinity of drive approaches for downhill lots, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. a) Standard 12-foot parkways shall be provided on Streets "D," "E," and Skyline Road south of Street "E," with sidewalks on one side. b) Five foot parkways are acceptable on portions of streets with no drive approaches. 20) Lots L, K, and M shall be deeded to Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD). 21) Lots J and N shall be deeded to the U. S. Forest Service. 22) The U. S. Forest Service shall approve the vacation of Big Tree Road south of Street "E." 23) The property line between Lot E and Lots 53 and 69 shall follow the top of the slope. 24) Provide top of .slope protection, designed for 1.5 X Q100, for the slope north and east of Street "C" and the adjacent Community Trail. Provide a private drainage facility along the toe of that slope which is located outside the public trail right-of-way (behind the retaining wall where applicable), with parkway culverts as needed. 25) Dedicate a standard cul-de-eac at the end of existing Crestview Place in the vicinity of Lots 1 and 25. 26) Provide gated entrances for all private streets with provisions for visitors not gaining access to turn around, outside of the public right-of- way, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. VTT 14475 - SAHAMA INVESTMENTS April 8, 1992 Page 8 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF APRIL 1992. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby ~ertify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of April 1992, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: SU~ECT: APPLICANT: LOCATION: ~ose ite~ c~ are ~b~ of ~mval. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DNISION, (714) 989-1861, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. Time Limits comp~on D== 1. Approval shall expire, unless extended by the Pinning Commission, ff building permits are / / not issued or approved use has not commenced within 24 months from the date of approval. 2. Development/Design Review shall be approved prior to / I , / / V/ 3. Approval of Tentative Tract No. v~/-,f',,f:~5' is granted subject to the approval of / / 4. The developer shall commence, participate in, and consummate or cause to be commenced, / / participated in, or consummated, a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District (CFD) for the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District to finance construction and/or maintenance of a fire station to serve the development. The station shall be located, designed, and built to all specifications of the Rancho Cucamenga Fire Protection District, and shall become the DistricTs property upon completion. The equipment shall be selected by the Distdct in accordance with its needs. In any building of a station, the developer shall comply with all applicable laws and regulmion$. The CFD sham be formed by the District and the developer by the time recordation of the final map _oc~_jrs. V/ 5. Prior to recordation of the final map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes / /.__ first, the applicant shall consent to, Or participate in, the establishment of a Meilo-Roos Community Facilities District for the construction and maintenance of necessary school facilities. However, ff any school district has previously established such a Community Fadlities District, the applicant shall, in the alternative, consent to the annexation of the project site into the territory of such existing District prior to the recordation of the final map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes first. Further, It the affected school district has not formed a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District within twelve months from the date of approval of the project and prior to the recordation of the final map or issuance of building permits for said project, this condition shall be deemed null and void. SC - 2/91 I of 12 , This condition shall be waived it the City receives notice that the applicant and all affected school districts have entered into an agreement to privately accommodate any and all school impacts as a remit of this project. 6. Prior to recordation of the final map or prior to issuance of building permits when no map is / / involved, written certification from the affected water district that adequate sewer and water facilities are or will be available to serve the proposed project shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. B. Site Development Y/ 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which / / include site plans. architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division. the conditions contained herein. Developmere Code regulations, and Specific Plan and Planned Community. 2. Prior to any use of the pPoject site or business activity being commenced thereon, all / / Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 3. OccupancyofthefadlityshallnotcommenceuntilsuchtimeasallUniformBuiidingCodeand / / State Fire Marshall's regulations have been cornplied with. Prior to occupancy. plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division to show compliance. The building shall be inspected for compliance pdor to occupancy. V/ 4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be / / submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. V/ 5. All site. grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans Shall be coordinated for / , / consistency priorto issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.), or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lit subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development / / Code. all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community Plans or Specific Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 7. A detailed on-site lighting plan shall be reviewed and al:1)mved by the City Planner and / / Shariff's Department (989-6611 ) prior to the issuance of building permits. Such plan shall indicate style. illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect edjacem properties. / 8. If no centralized trash receptacles am provided. all trash pick-up shall be for individual units / / with all receptacles shielded from public view. 9. Trash receptacle(s) am required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations ---/ / and the number of trash receptacles shall be sul~ect to City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. / 10. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers. AC condensers, etc., shall / / he liceted out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City P a..er. SC- 2/9 1 2 of 12 11. Street names shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with / / the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map. 12. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, __/ / including proper illumination. V/' 13. A detailed plan indicating trail widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fenring, and / weed control, in accordance with City Master .Trail drawings, shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to approval and recordation of the Final Tract Map and prior to approval of street improvement and grading plans· Developer shall upgrade and construct all trails, including fencing and drainage devices, in conjunction with street improvements. / 14. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs) shall not prohibit the keeping of equine / / animals where zoning requirements for the keeping of said animals have been met. Individual lot owners in subdivisions shall have the option of keeping said animals without the necessity of appealing to boards of directors or homeowners' associations for amendments to the CC&Rs. V/ 15. The Covenants. Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the / / Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Divisions and the City Attorney. They shell be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of building permits. whichever occurs first. A recoffiecl copy shall be provided to the City Engineer· ~ 16. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property / / owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approval prior to issuance of building pannits. / 17. Solar access easements shall be dedicated for the purpose of assuming that each lot or / / dwelling unit shall have the right to receive sunlight across adjacent lots or units for use of a solar energy system. The easements may be contained in a Declaration of Restrictions for the subdivision which shall be recorded concurrently with the recordation of the final map or issuance of pannits, whichever comes first. The easements shall prohibit the casting of shadows by vegetation, structures, fixtures or any other object, except for utility wires and similar objects, pursuant to Development Code Section 17.08.060-G-2. 18. The project contains a designated Historical Landmark. The site shall be developed and / / maintained in accordance with the Historic Landmark Alteration Pennll No. · Any further modifications to the site including, but not limited to, exterior alterations and/or interior alterations which affect the exterior of the buildings or structures, re moval of landmark trees. demolition, relocatlon. reconstruction of buildings or structures. or changes to the site, shall require a modification to the Historic Landmark Aileratlon Permit subject to Historic Preservation Commission review and approval. C. Building Design 1. An alternative energy system is required to provide domestic hot water for all dwelling units / / and for heating any swimming pool or spa, unless other altemative energy systems are demonstrated to be of equivalent capacity and effiolency. All swimming pools installed at the time of initial development shall be supplemented with solar heating. Details shall be included in the building plans and shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building pannils. 2. All dwellings shall have the front, side and rear elevations upgraded with architectural / treatment, detailing and increased delineation of surface treatment subject to City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building pannits. SC- 2/91 3 o1' 12 3. Standard patio cover plans for use by the Homeowners' Association shall be submitted for / / City Planner and Building Official review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 4. All roof appurtenances, including air conditionere and other roof mounted equipment and/or / / projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Division. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Details shall be included in building plans. D. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate dills on building plans) 1. All perking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall / / contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curb). 2..Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pevement across circulation aisles shall be / / provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open speces/ plazas/recreational uses. 3. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, / / entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. 4. All units shall be provided with garage door openers it driveways are lass than 18 feet in / I .... depth from back of sidewalk. 5. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions shall restffi;t the storage of recreational vehicles / / on this site unless they are the principal source of_transportation for the owner and prohibit perking on interior circulation aisles other than in designated visitor perking areas. 6. Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the City Planner, City Engineer, and / / Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Distdct ravlaw and approval priorto issuance of building permits. E. Landscaping (for publlcty maintained landscape areas, re!~r to Section N.) v/ 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscap- / /.-- ing in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Ranner review and approval prlorto the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. / 2. Existing trees required t~ ba preserved in place sha~~ be pr~tected with a constructlon barder / / in accordance with the MunicipaiCode Seclion 19.08.110, and so notedonthegrading plans. The location ot those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans. The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting and trimming methods. 3. Aminimumof trssspergrossacre,comprisedofthefollowingsizes, shall be provided / / within the project: % - 48- inch box or larger, % - 36- inch box or larger, __ % - 24- inch box or lalr, __ % - 15-gallon, and __ % - 5 gallon. 4. A minimum of % of trees planted within the project shall be specimen size trees - / / 24-inch box or larger. 5. Within perking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three ~ /.__ parking stalls, sufficient to shade 50% of the perking area at solar noon on August 21. SC - 2/9 1 4 of 12 Comd~do. 6. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of building. __J / v/ 7. AIIprivateslopebanks5feetorlessinverticalheightandof5:l orgmaterslope, but less than / /. 2:1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion comml. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 8. AII Private slopes inexcessof5feet, but lessthan8 feet invertical height and of 2:l orgreater / / slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1 -gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to 9. For single family residential development, all slope plaming and irrigation shall be continu- / / ously maintained in a healthy and thdving condition by the developer until each individual unit is so id and occupied by the buyer. Prior to re leasing occupancy for those u nits, an inepectlon shall be conducted by the Ranning Division to determine that they are in satisfactory 10. For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are respon- / /, sible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way. All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debds and maintained in a healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and rimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant rnatedal shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage. 11. Front yard landscaping shall be required per the Development Code and/or / / · This requirement shall be in addition to the required street trees and slope planting. 12. The final design of the perimeter parkways, wlgis, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be / / included in the required landscape plans and Shall be subject to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Division. 13. Special landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, specimen size trees, meander- / / ing sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensified landscaping, is required along v/ 14. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on / / the perimeter of this project area Shall be continuously maintained by the developer. v/ 15. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, / /.~ the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division. 16. Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for City Planner review and / / approval prior to issuance of building permits. These criteria shall encourage the natural growth characteristics of the selected tree species. / 17. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of / / Xedscape as defined in Chapter 19.16 of the Rancho Cucamenga Municipal Code. sc- 2/9 1 5 or 12 F. Signs 1. ~es;~iM~onthesubm~plansare~e;ualonlyand~tapanof this~mval, Any s;~ pm~ for this deve~pmnt shall ~ with the S~n Offiina~e a~ shall r~uim H~rate ~li~ion a~ ~proval by the Planni~ Divis~n pr~r to installalan of any s~ns. 2. A Un~o~ S~n Pr~ram for this deve~pm~ shall ~ subm~ for C~ Planner review a~ ~roval pdor to issua~e of bui~i~ ~s. 3. Dir~o~ mnumem s~n(s) shall ~ ~v~ for ~n~m, ~ominium, or townSins p~r to ~~y a~ shall r~im separae a~i~n a~ ~mval by the Planni~ DNis~n p~r to ~sua~e of ~i~i~ ~s. G. Environmental 1. ~e deve~r shall pmv~e ea~ pms~ive ~yer w~en ~t~ of the Fou~h Street Ro~ Crusher pmjffi in a staMard fo~at ~ ~te~n~ by the C~y Planner, p~r to a~pti~ a ~sh ~s~ on any ~. · v I r II S~il S~ies Zo~ for t~~ FauR. in a ~a~affi fo~. dete~in~ by the CHy Planner, ~r to ~i~ a ~ de~sH on a~ ~. 3. '~e ~vei~r shall ~v/e~h ~~e buyer w~en ~t~e of the Foothill Freeway pmje~ in a ~a~ffi fo~t B dete~i~ by tN C~ P~n~r, ~r to a~i~ a ~sh de~s~ on a~ ~. 4. A fiMI a~u~l m~ s~ll ~ ~ed for C~ Pinner rev~ a~ ;val ~or to the is~a~e of ~i~i~ ~s. TM final m~ sMII di~ss t~ Ivel of ime~r raise a~enua~nto be~w45CNEL, t~i~i~eda~ ~n~m~iont~hn~ues~v~, a~ ff ~m~ae, ve~ t~ M~ of t~ mH~t~n ~sms. T~ ~i~i~ ~ans will ch~ for ~o~ w~ t~ ~t~n ~asums ~main~ in t~ final H. ~her AgenclM 1. E~e~~~sMIl~v~ina~ffia~w~hRa~Cu~m~aFire Pmt~n Di~ 9a~a~. 2. E~~BshallN~v~,mtmeM~fre~clar, a minimmof26feetw~e ~ all tires ~d~ ~~~ in a~ffim w~h Ra~ C~m~ Fire Pmtffi~n D~ r~im~nt. 3. P~r to ~a~ of ~i~ ~s for ~i~ ~t~bn. e~e s~ll ~ su~ to tN R~ ~m~ Rm P~n D~ t~ te~m~ waer ~ for fire pmt~ B ~al//, ~Ni~ ~t~n of ~ulr~ lira ~l~n s~tem. 4. ~e ~m sMII ~ ~ U. S. P~al ~ to Nte~i~ IN ~ate t~ a~ ~at~n of rail ~xes. Mu~i-fami~ r.~emil ~vemms s~l ~v~ a ~1~ ove~ead strum for ~il ~xes w~h ~me I~Mi~. ~e final ~t~n of ~ rail ~xes aM the des;n of the ove~ad ~m ~all N ~ to C~ PinMr mv~ a~ a~roval p~r to the issua~e of ~i~i~ ~s. V/ 5. For projects using septic tank facilities, written certification of acceptability, including all / / supportive information, shall be obtained from the San Bernardino County Department of Environmemal Health and submitted to the Building Official prior to the issuance of Septic Tank Permits, and prior to issuance of building permits. sc- 2/91 6 or 12 P~oi~ com_d~o~ APPLICA~ SHA~ C~A~ THE BUILDING AND SAF~ DIVISION, ~14) 9~-1~, FOR COMPLIANCE ~ ~E FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: I. S~e ~ve~nt / 1. ~e ~pl~am s~ll m~y w~h the late~ a~pt~ Unffo~ Bui~i~ C~e, Unffo~ M~hani- / / ~1 ~, Unffo~ Plumbi~ ~e, Nat~nal EI~ ~e, a~ all other ~i~ble ~des, o~inames, a~ r~ulm~ns in eff~ at the tim of issua~ of relm~e ~its. Please ~ma~ the Bui~i~ a~ Safe~ D~is~n for ~pies of t~ ~e A~bn O~ina~e a~ ~l~le han~uts. ~ 2. P~r to issuan~ of ~i~i~ peaits for a n~ ms~l ~elli~ un~(s) or mawr a~n / / to existi~ un~(s), the ~l~m shall pay ~ve~mm fees m t~ est~li~ rote. ~ fees may i~e, bm am ~t lim~ to: C~ Beau~bn F~, Pare F~, Dmin~e Fee, Symems Devebpmm Fee, Pe~ a~ Plan Ch~i~ Fees, a~ ~1 F~s. 3. P~r to image of ~i~ing ~Rs for a n~ ~m~l or i~mdal deve~mem or / / a~n 1o an existi~ devebpmm, t~ ~i~m s~ll ~ ~ve~mm fees at the em~lis~d rate. Such fees may i~de, ~ are mt li~ to: Syme~ Deve~ment Fee, Drainage Fee, ~ol Fees, Perm~ and P~n Ch~ Fees. ~ 4. Street a~msses shall ~ pm~d~ by the Bui~i~ ~, ~er trammel ~ r~ation / / a~ p~r to i~ua~e of ~i~i~ ~s. J. Eximlng 9~ure 1. Prov~e ~lia~e w~h t~ Unffo~ ~i~i~ ~ for the ~ns~d~ use, area, a~ fire-msi~e~ of ex~i~ ~i~i~s. 2. ~imi~ ~i~ings shall ~ rode to ~ wffi ~ff~ ~i~i~ ~ zoni~ r~ulmbns for / / t~ ime~ use or t~ ~ildi~ shall ~ ~ml~. 3. ~i~ s~age di~sal radials s~ll ~ m~v~, fil~ a~or ~ to ~ly with the / / Unffo~ Pbmi~ ~ a~ Unffo~ ~i~i~ ~e, 4. U~mu~ on-~e mil~s am to ~ ~ a~ s~ on ~i~i~ ~ns ~bm~ for / / ~i~i~ ~R ~tbn. K, G~lng / 1. Gradi~ of t~ ~ ~dy s~ll ~ in ~m~ w~h ~ Un~ ~i~i~ ~, C~ / / G~i~ Sta~, a~ m~ gr~i~ ~ms. ~ li~l g~i~ ~an s~ll ~ in ~a~ ~o~ ~h t~ ~v~ gr~i~ ~. / 2. A ~ils r~ s~ll ~ ~r~ by a qualifid e~i~r I~e~ by t~ ~te of Calffomia to / / ~do~ ~ ~. 3. ~e ~vemm ~ ~ w~hin t~ ~il ems~n ~mml ~u~; a ~il D~~e / /.-- Pe~ ~ r~W~. Pim ~m~ San ~mffii~ ~u~ ~anmm of ~Rum m (714) ~7-2111 for ~ ~t~n. ~mmm~n of m~ ~ s~ll p~r ~ t~ ~um of ~h grai~ ~N. / 4. A g~l re~d shall ~ ~e~r~ by a qualff~ e~i~r or g~ist a~ sum~ at / l-- t~ tim of ~l~bn for gradi~ plan c~. ~ 5. ~efi~lgradi~ansshall~mplet~a~v~rtomua~of~i~i~~s. / / ~- 2/9 ~ 7 ~ ~2 6. As a custom-lot subdivision, the following requirements shall be met: a. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed guaranteeing completion of all on-site / / drainage facilities necessary for alewatering all parcels to the satistactlon of the Building and Safety Division priorto final map approval and prior to the issuance of grading permits. b. Appropriate easements for safe disposal of drainage wafer that are conducted onto / / or over adjacent parcels, am to be delineated and recorded to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Division prior to issuance of grading and building permits. c. On-site drainage improvements, necessary for alewatering and protecting the subdivided / / properties, are to be installed prior to issuance of building permits for construction upon any parcel that may be subject to drainage flows entering, leaving, or within a parcel relative to which a building permit is requested. d. Final grading plans for each parcel are to be submitted to the Building and Safety / / Division for approval priorto issuance of building and grading permits. (This may be on an incremental or composite basis.) e. All slope banks in excess of 5 feet in vertical height shall be seeded with native grasses / / or planted with ground cover for erosion control upon completion of grad|ng or some other altemative method of erosion control shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Building Official. In addition a permanent irrigation system shall be provided. This requirement does not release the applicant/developer from compliance with the slope planting requirements of Section 17.08.040 1 of the Development Code. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DNISION, (714) 989-1862, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: L Dedication and Vehicular Access J 1. Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets, community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. Private easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage. local feeder trails, etc.) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. 2.Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline): total feet on total feet on total feet on total feet on v/ 3. An irrevocable offer of dedication for ~ -foot wide roadway easemar, shall be made for all private streets or drives,e,vz:, v/ 4. Non-vehicular access shall be dedicated to the City for the following streets: ~ v/ 5. Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&R s or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map or prior to the issuance of building permits, where no map is involved. sc - 2/9 1 8 or 6. Private drainage easements forcross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or noted on the final map. 7. The final map shall clearly delineate a 1 O-foot minimum building restriction area on the neighboring lot adjoining the zero lot line wall and contain the following language: '!/We hereby dedicate to the City of Ranche Cucamonga the rfght to prohibit the construction of (residential) buildings (or other structures) within those areas designated on the map as building restriction areas." A maintenance agreement shall also be granted from each lot to the adjacent lot through the CC&R's. 8. All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shell be qu itclaimed or delineated on the final map. v/ 9. Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City wherever they encroach onto private property. 10. Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right tum lanes, to provide a minimum of 7 feet measured from the face of curbs. ff curb adjacent sidewalk is used along the right turn lane, a parallel street-tree maintenance easement shall be provided. 11. The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site property interests necessary to construct the required public improvements, and if he/she should fail to do so, the developer shall, at least 120 days prior to submittal of the final map for approval, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Govemment Code Section 66462 at such lima as the City acqu ires the property interests required for the improvements. Such agreement shall provide for payment by the developer of all costs incurred by the City to acquire the off-site property interests required in connection with the subdivision. Security for a pertion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the developer, at developer's cost. The appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal. M. Street .Improvements 1. All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, siclewaks, street lights, and street trees. 2. A minimum of 26- foot wide pavement, within a 40 -foot wide dedicated right-of-way shall be constructed for all half-section streets. 3. Construct the following perimeter street Improvements including, but not limited to: STREET NAME CURB & A.C. SIDE DRIVE STREET ,~ STREet COMM. MEDIAN OTHER GUTrER PVMT WALK APPR. uGHIS TREES TRAIL [,~D Notes: (a) Median islam includes landscapir~ and irrigation on motel {b) Pavomont reconstruction and ovedays will be determined dudng plan check. (c) ff so marked, side- walk shall be curvilinear per STD. 304. (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item. 4. Improvement plans and construction: a. Street improvement plans including street trees and street lights, prepared by a regis- / /.-- tered Civil Engineer, shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or pdvate street improve- ments, priorto final map approval orthe issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being pedormed in public fight-of-way, fees shall be paid and a / / construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineers Office in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic, street name signing, and interconnect conduit / / shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shell be installed on any new construction or reconstruction / of major, secondary or collector streets which intersect with other major, secondaW or collector streets for Mure traffic signals. Pull boxes shell be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BC R, EC R or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: / / (1) All pull boxes shall be No. 6 unless othenNise specified by the City Engineer. (2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pullrope. e. Wheel chair ramps shell be installed on all four comers of intersections per City / / Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shell remain open to traffic at all times with / / adequate detours during construction. A street closure permit may be required. A cash deposit shell be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sldewak drains shall be / / installed to City Standards, except for single family lots. h. Handicap access ramp design shell be as spedtied by the City Engineer. / / i. StreetnamesshallbeapprovedbytheCityPlannerpriortosubmittalforfirstplancheck. / / 5. Street improvement plans par City Standards for all private streets shell be provided for / / review and approval by the City Engineer. Prior to any work being pedormed on the pd- vate streets, fees shell be paid and construction permits shell be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required. 6. Street trees, a minimum of 15-galion size or larger, shell be installed per City Standards in / accordance with the City's street tree program. SC - 2/9 1 tO of 12 7. Intersection line of site designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for co nfo rmance with comde.o,, adopted policy. / a. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, / /- including driveways. Walls, signs, and slopes shall be located outside the lines of sight. Landscaping and other obstructions within the lines of sight shall be approved by the City Engineer. b. Local residential street intersections shall have their noticeability improved, usually by / / moving the 2 +/- closest street trees on each side away from the street and placed in a street tree easement. 8. A permit shall be obtained from CALTRANS for any work within the following right-of-way: / / 9. All public improvements on the following streets shall be operationally complete pdor to the / /.- issuance of building permits: N. Public Maintenance Are~ I A separate set of ................... plans per Engineering Public Works Standards / / shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. The following landscape parkways, · medians, paseos, easements, trails, or other areas are required to be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance District: v/ 2, A signed consent and waiver form to join and/orform the appropriate Landscape and Lighting / Districts shall be filed with lhe City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of buiidi ng permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer, 3, All required public landscaping and irrigation systems shall be continuously maintained by the / / developer until accepted by the City, 4. Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective / /,-- Beautification Master Ran: O. Drainage and Flood Comrol 1. The project (or pertions thereof) is located within a Flood Hazard Zone; therefore, flood / / protection measures shall be provided as certified by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer. V/ 2. It shall be the developers responsibility to have the current FIRM Zone Z~ / designation removed from the project area. The cleveloper's engineer shall prepere all necessary reports, plans, and hydmlegic/hydraulic calculations. A Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) shall be obtained from FEMA prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs tirst. A Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) shall be issued by FEMA prior to occupancy or improvement acceptance, whichever occurs first. v/ 3. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final --J map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. SC- 2/91 II of 12 v// 4. A permit from the County Flood Control District is required for work within its right-of-way. 5. Trees am prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk. / / V/ 6. Public storm drain easements shall be graded to convey overflows in the event of a / / blockage in a sump catch basin on the public street. P. Utilities v/' 1. Provide separate utility services to each pamel including sanitary sewerage system, water, / / gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. / 2.The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary, / / V/ 3. water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the / / Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bemardino. A letter of compliance from the CCWD is required pdor to final map approval or Issuance of permits, whichever occurs first, Q. General Requirements and Approvals 1. The separate parcels contained within the project beundades shall be legally combined into / / one parcel prior to issuance of building permits. 2. An easement for a joint use driveway shall be provided prbr to final map approval or / /- issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first, for: / / 3. Prior to approval of the final map a deposit shall be posted with the City covering the estimated cost of apportioning the assessments under Assessment Distdct among the newly created parcels. 4. Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Regional Mainline, Secondary Regional, and Master Plan / / Drainage Fees shall be paid prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance ff no map is involved. 5. Permits shall be obtained from the following agencies for work within their right-of-way: / / 6. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the Law Enforcement Community / / Fadlities District shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be berne by the Developer. 7. Prior to finalization of any development phase, suffident improvement plans shall be corn- / / pieted beyond the phase boundaries to assure secondary access and drainage protection to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Phase bounclahes shall correspond to lot lines shown on the approved tentative map. SC - 2/91 12 of 12 8.4 MITIGATION MEASURES LANDFORM AND TOPOGRAPHY 1. Project implementation shall comply with all grading provisions contained within the City's adopted Hillside Development Regulations. These regulations provide standards for revegetation of slopes, limitations on earthwork during the rainy season, setbacks for slope maintenance, slope ratios, areas of cut and fill, allowed fill depths, use of retaining walls, and other standards. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Grading Permit 2. Project implementation shall comply with all relevant standards from the Uniform Building Code pertaining to earthwork, grading, erosion control, soft compaction and other standards. These standards shall also apply to the selection, storage and maintenance of equipment used in grading and associated internal and off-site haul routes. Responsible Agency:. City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Grading Permit 3. As part of the submittal to the City for a Grading Permit, the applicant shall provide an approved erosion control and silt retention plan. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Grading Permit 4. In the event that cut and fiH volumes are not balanced on site, the applicant shall submit to the City a plan describing haul routes for off-site disposal of excess cut materials. This plan shall be approved by the City prior to issuance of a grading permit Responsible Agency:. City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Grading Permit 5. Any permits, approvals and environmental review required for construction of domestic water facilities shall be provided separately by Cucamonga County Water District. Responsible Agency: Cucamonga County Water District Implementation Timing: Prior to Approval of Projects to Construct Additional Facilities 6. In the event that any earthwork 'is proposed to occur within the Cucamonga Canyon Wash flood control easement, the applicant shall obtain an Encroachment Permit from the San Bernardino County Transportation/Flood Control District. Respons~le Agency:. San Bernardino County Transportation/Flood Control District. Implementation Timing: If required, Encroachment Permit to be obtained from the County prior to City of Rancho Cucamonga issuance of Grading Permit. GEOLOGY AND SOILS 7. No human occupied structures shall be built within the seismic exclusion zone. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Building Permit C----Xc~ 58 8. The project design shall conform with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code requirements as well as the recommendations of the Structural Engineers Association for mitigation of seismic shaking. Respons~le Agency:. City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Building Permit 9. A numerical coefficient for site-structure resonance of 1.0 shall be utilized. Responsible Agency:. City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Building Permit 10. As required by the Hillside Development Regulations, a statement shah be provided on the deeds informing homebuyers that the site is in an Alquist Priolo Special Studies Zone and subject to potential seismic hazards. Responsible Agency:. City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Certificates of Use and Occupancy Soils 11. Project implementation shah comply with all measures identified in the report prepared by RMA, including the requirement that final plans be reviewed by the geotechnical consultant to ensure that changes and revisions are made where nece~ary. Responsible Agency:. City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Grading Permit 12. All Fading shah be performed in accordance with all applicable City of Rancho Cucamonga requirements. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Ttming: Grading Permit 13. Building pad areas extending 5 feet beyond the exterior footing shall be undercut 1.0 feet below the bottom of the proposed footings. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Ti_m_ing: Building Permit 14. Oversize carth matcrials shah not be placed within 10-feet of finish grade without approval of the gcotechnical consultant. Respons~lc Agency:. City' of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Grading Permit 15. Setbacks from the top of the cliff shah utilize a 1.5 to 1 slope configuration, pins a 150- foot building setback from the top of the bank of Cucamonga Creek. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Grading Permit 16. Fill slopes of 2 to 1 slope shall not exceed 40-feet in height without geotechnical review and approval. All fill over cut slopes shah be cut back one full equipment width into the firm underlying soil layers and constructed as compacted fill slopes. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Grading Permit 17. A slope maintenance program shall be developed and implemented to control erosion and debris flows. Such program shall include an on-going rodent control program to minimize the slope-weakening effects of rodent burrowing. Respons~le Agency:. City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Grading Permit 18. Footings having a minimum width of 12-inches and placed a minimum of 12 inches below the lowest adjacent grade shall have a soil bearing value of 1800 pounds per square fool This value may be increased by 20% for each additional foot of width or depth to a maximum value of 3000 pounds per square fool (Reinforcement of footings for soil expansion is not required.) Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Grading Permit 19. Soils engineering observation and testing shah be conducted upon completion of clearing and grubbing; during excavation and overexcavation in alluvial soil areas; during all phases of rough Fading; and when any unusual conditions are encountered during grading. A final soils engineering report shall be submitted to the City upon completion of grading. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Monitoring During Project Grading, and Report submittal on Completion of Grading. HYDROLOGY 20. TF 14475 drainage improvements shah conform to all standards established by the City for intercepting and conducting onsite and offsite tributary flows around or through the site to the Almond Interceptor Channel, including adequate protection for adjacent and downstream properties. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Grading Permit 21. Drainage improvements shall conform with all requirements established by the San Bernardino County Transportation/Flood Control DepartmenL Responsible Agency:. County of San Bernardino Implementation Timing: During Review of Maps and Plans, and as part of Encroachment Permit (if required) 22. The portion of the site within the Cucamonga Creek drainage shall be covered by an adequate City drainage easement. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Grading Permit 23. A minimum 150 foot building setback shall be established from the top of the bank of Cucamonga Creek. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Tuning: Grading Permit 24. A stringent program of slope and erosion control shah be undertaken by the developer to prevent damage to the site and downstream properties during heavy storm runoffs, especially during construction. ResponsiBle Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Grading Permit 2.5. A permit shall be obtained from the County in the event project implementation will require encroachment onto Flood Control Department right-of-way. Responsible Agency: County of San Bernardino Transportation/Flood Control Department (if required) Implementation Timing: Prior to initiation of earthwork inside the County right-of-way CULTURAL RESOURCES 26. A qualified archaeologist shall monitor brush-clearing and earth-moving operations in the vicinity of SBr-3004, and shall determine the area to be so monitored. In the event that monitoring yields evidence of archaeological resources, the archaeologist shall evaluate the significance of the resources. ff deemed appropriate on the basis of this evaluation, the archaeologist shall develop a mitigation program. These measures shall be implemented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga (or its contractors), and funded by the project applicant. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Grading Permit 27. Regardless of the outcome of the mitigation measure above, the following additional steps have been developed by the Native American Heritage Society and shall be undertaken immediately upon discovery of human remains at the construction site: a) In the event of discovery of human remains, there shall be no further excavation or disturbance if the site or any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent remains until the San Beruardino County Coroner has determined, in accordance with Chapter 10 of Part 3 of Division 2 of Title 3 of the Government Code, that the remains are not subject to the provisions of Section 27491 of the Government Code or any other related provisions of law and recommendations concerning the disposition of such remains have been made to the City of Rancho Cucamonga in the manner provided in Section 5097.98 of the Public Resources Code. The coroner shall make a determination within two working days from the date of notification. b) If the coroner determines that the remains are not subject to his or her authority and also recognizes the human remains to be those of a Native American, the coroner shall contact the Native American Heritage Commission by telephone within 24 hours. Responsible Agency:. City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Ttming: During Grading and Construction MR QUALrrY 28. Concurrent with the application for a grading permit, the applicant shall propose suppression measures for fugitive dust in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building Code requirements. These measures shall be incorporated as conditions of the grading permit. Responsible Agency:. City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Grading Permit BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES 29. The applicant shah comply with aH provisions regarding landscaping as provided in the City's adopted Hillside Development Regulations. Respons~le Agency:. City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Recordation of Tentative Tract Map 30. The applicant shall avoid damaging or removing mature native coast live oaks from their locations on site. Efforts to avoid damage shah include (1) irrigation that prevents overwatering or underwatering of native oaks; (2) avoidance of soil compaction above the root zone; (3) preservation of adequate drainage; (4) prohibition on use of weed inhibiton (during road paving) in the vicinity of oak trees. If native oak trees are removed as a result of site preparation, they shah be replaced by boxed specimens in compatible areas to be selected by a qualified expert. Respons~le Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Building Permit 31. Revegetation shah be accomplished on aH graded and cut-and fill areas where structures or improvements are not constructed. Preference shah be given to the use of drought- adapted, ~re-retardant plant materials, especially species native to the southern California foothills. Use of these materials shah be contingent on availability of seed stocks and approval of appropriate fire management agencies. If landscaping requires irrigation for growth, consideration shah be given to use of water injection systems. Respons~le Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Building Permit 32.. Measures shah be taken to minimize entry of construction sediments into drainages. Hydroseeding shah be practices with use of rapid-developing, soil-anchoring groundcover and strategic placements of runoff-retaining structures. Responsible Agency:. City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Grading Permit 33. The Homeowners' Association for TI' 14475 shah be responsible for ensuring that all on- and off-site open space areas are buffered in a manner to discourage encroachment by the new human population. Measures shah include but not be limited to (1) fencing-off of the sandy wash to discourage off-road vehicle and other use of this area, and (2) posting of interpretivc signage at the wash edge to education residents about the sensitivity of this habitat for plants and animal species. Trail systems shah be designed to protect these areas from human use, the enforcement of which shah be the responsibility of the Homeowners' AssociatiOn as well as the City, and shah not terminate at the boundaries of open space areas. The applicant shah incorporate, and the Homeowners' Association enforce, deed restrictions that regulate the management of household pets and the operation of motorized off-road vehicles. Responsible Agency: City ofRancho Cucamonga; Homeowners' Association Implementation Timing: Recordation of Tentative Tract Map and On-going 3.4. Night lighting shah be screened from intrusion into open space areas by means of restricted placement, and/or low-intensity bulbs, and/or low elevation and hooded standards, and/or shielding by internal silvering of the glove or external opaque reflectors. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Certificates of Use and Occupancy 62 ON-SITE AND SURROUNDING LAND USES 35. The applicant shall submit to the City a recorded property line survey showing all boundaries along the northerly property boundaries as prepared by a licensed land surveyor. Comers shall be monumented in accordance with State law. Any lots having a common line with the National Forest shall have that line permanently and visibly posted and monumented. As indicated in correspondence from the Forest Service, the current site plan would require posting only along the north line of Lot B. This survey shall also determine the status of the three private parcels on the northern site boundary (parcels 200-051-08, -09, and -12). If appropriate based on survey findings and an analysis of the buildability of the lots, additional mitigation measures shall be developed to assure that these parcels do not become landlocked as a consequence of TT 14475 implementation. Responsible Agency:. City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Grading Permit 36. The City shall require that the applicant revise the internal trail system to eliminate discontinuous trail terminl along the National Forest boundary, and shall consider an integrated loop trail along the project perimeter. The backbone trail along Cucamonga Canyon Wash shall be fenced on both sides, and pulled back approximately 15 to 25 feet from the top of the canyon wall The Homeowners' Association shall be responsible for posting all trails with signs stating that no riding is permitted off of project trails, off of Big Tree Road, or in the Cucarnonga Canyon Wash. Responsible Agencies: City of Rancho Cucamonga; Homeowners' Assocation Implementation Timing: Grading Permit 37. The project proposal shall be considered by the Grading Review Committee, the Technical Review Committee, the Trails Advisory Committee, and the Design Review Committee for consistency with the City General Plan and Development Code (including the Hillside Development Regulations). Requirements developed through these reviews shall be incorporated as conditions of project approval and implemented by the applicant. Responsible Agency:. City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Grading Permit 38. During these review processes, it is recommended that the City give close attention to the following areas that have been found to be potentially in conflict with relevant plans: (1) layout of streets and residences that does not maximize access to solar energy; (2) circulation system omission of split roadways and shared driveways; (3) building heights and envelopes that may exceed Hillside Regulation standards; (4) trail locations and termini that may conflict with conservation goals as expressed by the Forest Service and project biologists; (5) design modifications to accommodate public use of Big Tree Road, including parking, security and screening; (6) compliance with fill depth requirements and retaining wall heights; (7) pad placement on Lots #40, 48, 49, 53, 54, 62, 66 and 67, that may result in significant grading requirements; and (8) pad placement on lots adjacent to Cucamonga Creek to ensure compliance with the 150-foot building setback from the top of Cucamonga Creek (the pad for Lot 11 appears to conflict with this provision). Responsible Agency:. City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Grading Permit 63 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION 39. Any use of, modification of, encroachment ohm, relocation or, or impacts upon the Forest Road 1N34 (Big Tree Road) will require advance coordination with the Forest Service. Responsible Agencies: City of Rancho Cucamonga; U.S. Forest Service Implementation Timing: Grading Permit 40. The current sunset-m-sunrise closure of Forest Road 1N34 and Party Point will be maintained by both the City and the Forest Sexyice to preclude resumption of illegal uses. The City shah coordinate with the Forest Service regarding potential impacts of the project on these agreements, and the City shah in turn coordinate with the applicant regarding any actions required on the part of Sahama Investments or future residents of TT 14475 to ensure that the closures are enforced. Responsible Agencies: City of Rancho Cucamonga; U.S. Forest Service Implementation Timing: Prior to Project Approval (communication); On-going (enforcement of closure) 41. The deeds to all lots within TT 14475 shall clearly notify buyers of the status of Big Tree Road as a public passageway pursuant m Federal Law, and contain clear notification of potential exposure to noise, traffic and public visitation resulting from thi.~ legal access. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Tuning: Certificates of Use and Occupancy 42. To partially mitigate the cumulative adverse impacts associated with increased development along the National Forest boundary, the City shall invite the Forest Service to prepare an environmental handout that addresses public use and adjacent residential issues in an informational and educational manner. The City shah require the developer to provide a copy of this handout to all new property owners within the TT 14475 project Respons~le Agencies: City of Rancho Cucamonga; U.S. Forest Service Implementation Timing: Grading Permit (invitation) and During Home Sales Program (handout distribution) 43. The City and the U.S. Forest Service shall take the following measures to reduce conflicts between recreational and residential interests: (1) maintaining the connection to Big Tree Road at "D" Street to reduce the distance recreational vehicles must travel in the tract; and (2) Posting ~No Recreational Vehicle Parking" signs within TI' 14475 where necessary. Additionally, the City and the U.S. Forest Service shall consider implementation of the following measure (or other means): (3) Erecting a protective barrier along segments of Big Tree Road that adjoin TT 14475 residential lots. Such barrier shall be placed and designed in conjunction with Forest Service consultation- Respons~le Agencies: City of Rancho Cucamonga; U.S. Forest Service Implementation Timing: Grading Permit (connection to Big Tree Rd. and protective barriers); Certificate~ of Use and Occupancy (signs) 44. Consistent with General Plan requirements for private roads, the City Engineer shall review and approve the final site plan. The plan shall provide security gates at all points of entry;, maintenance and operation costs shall be solely at the expense of project homeowners. If the circulation system is protx3sed to be public, the project road system will be revised to conform fully with City standards for public roads. During Design Review, the City will determine whether the circulation system complies with relevant fife protection standards and will incorporate modifications if required based on this review. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Recordation of Final Map PUBLIC SERVICES AND UTILITIES Fire Protection 45. Dead-end streets that are to be extended at a future date shall be designed as temporary culs-de-sac to provide for adequate turn-around diameters for emergency vehicles. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Recordation of Final Map 46. All standards of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District shall be implemented. Additionally, the applicant shall retain a wildland fire consultant during project design. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Grading Permit 47. All proposed develppment shall satisfy the structural fire protection standards contained in the most recent adopted edition of the Uniform Building Code and Uniform Fire Code. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Building Permit 48. Fire protection water systems and fire hydrants necessary to serve the project within the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District's minimum response time shall be in place and operational prior to delivery of materials for building construction. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Building Permit 49. Recommendations contained in the 1991 Phase One Wildland Fire Safety RenOrt for the project shall be implemented, and the Phase Two report shall be compleied prior to final map recordation. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Recordation of Final Map Police Services 50. Clearly marked house numbers shall be inCorporated into project design standards. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Building Permit 51. The San Bernardino County Sheriffs Department shall be consulted prior to project implementation to assess the need for additional department personnel and equipment. and to obtain information on crime prevention measures that can be incorporated into project design. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Building Permit 65 Water Supply 52. Domestic water storage and distribution facilities necessary to serve the project site shall be provided in accordance with CCWD requirements. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Issuance of Will Serve Letter 53. The project shall incorporate water conservation measures as required by state law, including but not limited to low-volume toilets, shower-heads and faucets, insulation of water lines in water recirculating systems, and plumbing materials and techniques (please refer to the attachment to the NOP response from the Department of Water Resources for a comprehensive list of required and recommended water conservation measures). Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Building Permit 54. On-site pump and pressure tank systems shall be provided for Lots 47 through 53 if required to ensure adequate water pressures. Responsible Agen.cy: City of Rancho Cucamonga, Cucamonga County Water District Implementation Timing: Grading Permit 55. Access to Reservoir 7A shall meet with the approval of CCWD officials. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga, Cucamonga County Water District Implementation Timing: Grading Permit Wastewater 56. The proposed onsite sewage disposal system shall be reviewed and approved by the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board prior to project approval. This review will require that percolation tests be performed by the applicant to establish the suitability of on-site soils for septic leaching, and to determine if potential water quality impacts would result from use of an on-site septic tank system. Responsible Agency: Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board and City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Grading Permit Schools 57. As required by state law, the applicant shall pay per unit fees for the funding of educational programs. Responsible Agency:. City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Grading Permit 58. Prior to recordation of the final map, a meeting shall be held between the City, school district officials and the applicant to determine whether additional assistance will be required to serve students generated by the TT 14475 project. Such measures, if needed, could include supplemental funding agreements or participation in a community facilities district to generate additional revenues for education. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Recordation of Final Map Solid Waste No mitigation measures are required or proposed. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 14475, A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF 71 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS ON 113 ACRES OF LAND IN THE HILLSIDE RESIDENTIAL (LESS THAN 2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) AND OPEN SPACE DISTRICTS, LOCATED NORTH OF ALMOND AVENUE BETWEEN SAPPHIRE AND TURQUOISE STREETS, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 200-051-55, 56, and 57. A. Recitals. (i) Sahama Investments has filed an application for the Design Review of Vesting Tentative Tract No. 14475 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter, the subject Design Review request is referred to as "the application." (ii) On the 25th day of March 1992, and continued to the 8th day of April 1992, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on April 8, 1992. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on March 25 and April 8, 1992, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located north of Almond Avenue, between Sapphire and Turquoise Streets, and the property is presently vacant. Big Tree Road, serving the San Bernardino National Forest, is located along the eastern tract boundary. (b) The property to the north is located within the San Bernardino National Forest and is vacant. The property to the south is designated for residential uses and is being developed for single family homes and is vacant. The property to the east, located within the County of San Bernardino, is designated by the City's General Plan for residential and open space uses and is presently vacant. The property along the western boundary includes the Cucamonga Wash which is designated as Open Space; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. VTT 14475 - SAHAMA INVESTMENTS April 8, 1992 Page 2 (c) The application contemplates the development of 71 single family lots on 58 buildable acres (as defined by the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code) which is consistent with the Hillside Residential designation of the Development Code and the Very Low Residential designation of the General Plan; and (d) The project, with the recommended conditions of approval, complies with all minimum development standards of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs i and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That~tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; and (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; and (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; and (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; and (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; and (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. (4) This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission has certified the adequacy of the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 14475. (5) Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planninq Division: 1) The final map shall be consistent with Vesting Tentative Tract Map 14475 Alternative "B" as shown on the attached Exhibit "A" and subject to additional conditions contained within this Resolution. 90 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. VTT 14475 - SAHAMA INVESTMENTS April 8, 1992 Page 3 2) All applicable mitigation measures identified in Section 8 of the final Subsequent Environment Impact Report shall be incorporated into the final plans. A copy of said mitigations are attached as Exhibit "B." 3) The Community Trail on the north side of Street "C" shall be extended to Skyline Road. 4) The Community Trail on the west side of Lot 30 shall be redesigned to eliminate slopes in excess of 15 percent. The final alignment shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner and City Engineer prior to the final map recordation. 5) The local trail between Lots 30 and 31 shall be deleted. 6) The local trail between Lots 67 and 68 shall be realigned to intersect Skyline Road at the intersection with Street "C." The final plan shall 'be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to final map recordation. 7) The local trail on the north and east side of Lot 71 shall be deleted. 8) The local trail across Lots F and 70 shall be deleted. 9) Prior to recordation of the final map, Phase II of the Wildland Fire Study shall be reviewed and approved by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District, the National Forest Service, and the City Engineer. 10) Community Trail street crossings shall be constructed with the following items: a) Textured pavement, such as open graded asphalt or medium broom finish concrete, to prevent horses from slipping. b) Pavement markings and warning signs to alert motorists. c) Concrete aprons shall be of transverse medium broom finish. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. VTT 14475 - SAHAMA INVESTMENTS April 8, 1992 Page 4 11) Community Trail connections to streets shall be constructed with a vehicle gate with side step- through (see Standard Drawing 1006A). 12) Local Feeder trail connections to Community Trails shall be constructed with a step-through (see Standard Drawing #1007) across the full trail width and signs identifying the public Community Trail. 13) Tree Removal Permit No. 92-06 is approved subject to the following conditions: a) Those two trees identified by the arborist as worthy of preservation shall be ~preserved in place pursuant to Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Se. 19.08.110. Chain link fencing shall be provided around the trees prior to commencement of grading activity to protect the trees. b) The remaining 34 trees shall be removed and replaced on a one-for-one basis, in a size and species to the satisfaction of the City Planner, prior to occupancy release. 14) Pursuant to provisions of California Public Resources Code Section 21089(b), this application shall not be operative, vested, or final, nor will building permits be issued or a map recorded, until (1) the Notice of Determination (NOD) regarding the associated environmental action ie filed and posted with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Bernardino; and (2) any and all required filing fees assessed pursuant to California Fish and Game Code Section 711.4, together with any required handling charges, are paid to the County Clerk of the County of San Bernardino. The applicant shall provide the Planning Department with a stamped and conformed copy of the NOD together with a receipt showing that all fees have been bald. Enqineerinq Division: 1) All streets and storm drains within and required as conditions of approval for Tract 10210 shall be constructed, if not completed by others. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. VTT 14475 - SAHAMA INVESTMENTS April 8, 1992 Page 5 2) Extend the storm drain in Skyline Road from its terminus north of Inspiration Drive to north of Street "C" and provide a lateral within Streets "E" and "F" as determined by the Final Drainage Study. 3) The private drainage facility on Lot 43 shall be an open trapezoidal channel designed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and Building Official. Extend the storm drain in Streets "E" and "F" to connect with this facility. The transition from an open channel to a pipe shall occur outside the street right-of-way. Provide a trash rack where flows enter the pipe as well as adjacent to Big Tree Road. 4) Lot ~ shall be deeded to San Bernardino County Flood Control District(SBCFCD), or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 5) The storm drainage facility on Lots 4, 5, and A, which drains Crestview Place and the lots in the westerly portion of the tract, shall be designed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and SBCFCD as determined by the Final Drainage Study. IF SBCFCD refuses to accept the facility, the streets and drainage devices paralleling the community trails in the western portion of the tract shall be redesigned to direct flows south along Crestview Place. If necessary, the existing storm drain which extends south of the Crestview/Almond intersection to the Almond intersection shall be extended and/or upsized to accommodate the additional flows. 6) The Developer shall record a Drainage Acceptance Agreement for all Community Trail runoff entering private drainage easements. 7) Concrete culverts shall be provided whenever private drainage crosses Community Trails. Provide parkway culverts whenever concentrated trail drainage enters streets. 8) Community Trails shall be dedicated to the City as follows: a) Standard 20-foot interior trails along the north and south tract boundaries, the east side of Lots A and C, and the west side of Lot J. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. VTT 14475 - SAHAMA INVESTMENTS April 8, 1992 Page 6 b) Twelve-foot parkway trails on the east side of Skyline Road south of Street "E," the south side of Street "E," and the east side of Street "C;" and c) A 10-foot interior trail on the south and west sides, respectively, of Lots M and S, transitioning to 20 feet adjacent to Lot 43. 9) Private drainage devices adjacent to all Community Trails shall be located outside the public rights-of-way and maintained by the Homeowners Association, including the retaining wall and gutters shown in Section X-X. 10) Commdnity Trail grades shall not exceed 15 percent, except along the east tract boundary where accessibility for maintenance vehicles shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 11) Water bars shall be provided on all north-south Community Trails. 12) Provisions shall be made for maintenance vehicle access to the Community Trail from Skyline Road, Crestview Place, Street "C," and Street "E." 13) Intersections of local trails with perimeter Community Trails shall allow equestrian and pedestrian access, but not vehicles. 14) Community Trail fencing shall be located south and west of the retaining wall on Lots M and S, respectively. 15) Community Trail fencing on the east side of Skyline Road shall be located outside the intersection lines of sight for Street "D." 16) Driveway lines of sight shall be plotted on the Grading and Street Improvement Plans for driveways along the inside of the curve in Skyline Road and for Lot i on Crestview Place. Walls, slopes, and other obstructions shall be located outside the lines of sight. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. VTT 14475 - SAHAMA INVESTMENTS April 8, 1992 Page 7 17) All vertical curves for all streets shall have a stopping sight distance of 30 mph, minimum, or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 18) The tops and toes of slopes adjacent to streets shall be rounded to blend with the adjacent topography. 19) Provide a minimum flat parkway width of 5 feet, measured form the back of the curb, where lots slope up from the street and 7 feet where lots slope down from the street. Where both conditions exist on one side of a street, the 7 foot dimension shall be used in the vicinity of drive approaches for downhill lots, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. a) Standard 12-foot parkways shall be provided on Streets "D," "E," and Skyline Road south of Street "E," with sidewalks on one side. b) Five foot parkways are acceptable on portions of streets with no drive approaches. 20) Lots L, K, and M shall be deeded to Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD). 21) Lots J and N shall be deeded to the U. S. Forest Service. 22) The U. S. Forest Service shall approve the vacation of Big Tree Road south of Street "E." 23) The property line between Lot E and Lots 53 and 69 shall follow the top of the slope. 24) Provide top of slope protection, designed for 1.5 X Q100, for the slope north and east of Street "C" and the adjacent Community Trail. Provide a private drainage facility along the toe of that slope which is located outside the public trail right-of-way (behind the retaining wall where applicable), with parkway culverts as needed. 25) Dedicate a 60 foot right-of-way for all interior public streets, shown as lettered Lots G and H on the tentative map. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. VTT 14475 - SAHAMA INVESTMENTS April 8, 1992 Page 8 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF APRIL 1992. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, p~ssed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of April 1992, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: o, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLICANT: LOCATION: Those items checked are Conditions of Approval. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DNISION, (714) 989-1861, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. TIme LImits v/' 1. Approval shall expire, unless extended by the Pinning Commission, if building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 24 months from the date of approval. 2. Development/Design Review shell be approved prior to / / . 3. Approval of Tentative Tract No. ~/-f,.yT'5' is granted subject to the approval of 4. The developer shall commence, participate in, and consummate or cause to be commenced, participated in, or consummated, a MelIo-Roos Community Fadlities District (CFD) for the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District to finance construction and/or maintenance of a fire station to serve the development. The station shall be located, designed, and built to all specifications of the Rancho Cucamonga F~re Protection District, and shall become the District's property upon completion. The equipment shall be selected by the Distdct in accordance with its needs. In any building of a station, the developer shell comply with all aic;q;)licable laws and regulations. The CFD shell be formed by the District and the developer by the time recordation of the final map occurs. 5. Prior to recordation of the final map or the issuance of building perTnits, whichever comes first, the applicant shell consent to, or participate in, the establishment of a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District for the construction and maintenance of necessary sChool facilities. However, ff any school district has previously established such a Community Facilities District, the applicant shell, in the alternative, consera to the annexation of the project site into the territory of such existing District prior to the recordation of the final map or the issuance ol building permits, whichever comes first. Further, if the affected sChool district has not formed a Melio-Roos Community Facilities District within twelve months from the date of approval of the project and prior to the recordation of the final map or issuance of building permits for said project, this condition shall be deemed null and void. SC - 2/9l I o~ 12 This condition shall be waived if the City receives notice that the applicant and all affected school districts have entered into an agreement to privately accommodate any and all school impacts as a result of this project. 6. Prior to recordation of the final map or prior to issuance of building permits when no map is __/___./__ involved, written certification from the affected water district that adequate sewer and water facilities are or will be available to serve the propos.ed project shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or priorto issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. B. SIte Development V/' 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which / / include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors. landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, and Specific Plan and Planned Community. 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all / / Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 3. OccupancyofthefacilityshallnotcommenceuntilsuchtimeasallUniformBuildingCodeand / / State Fire Marshairs regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division to show compliance. The building shall be inspected for compliance pdor to occupancy. v/ 4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be / / submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. I/' 5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for / / consistency priorto issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.). or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development / / Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community Plans or Specific Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 7. A detailed on-site lighting plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner and / / Sheriff's Department (989-6611 ) prior to the issuance of building permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. / 8. If no centralized trash receptacles am provided, all trash pick-up shall be for individual units / / with all receptacles shielded Irom public view. 9. Trash receptacle(s) am required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, / / and the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 10. All ground-mouSed utility appurtenances suCh as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall / /- he located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls. berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City SC- 2/91 2 of 12 t 1. Street names shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with / / the aclopled Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map. 12. All building numbere and individual units shall be identitied in a clear and concise manner, / / including proper illumination. 13. A detailed plan indicaling trail widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing, and ../ / weed control, in accordance with City Master Trail drawings. shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval priorto approval and recordation of the Final Tract Map and prior to approval of streel improvement and grading plans. Developer shall upgrade and construct all trails, including fencing and drainage devices, in conjunction with street improvements. 14. The Covenants. Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs) shall not prohibit the keeping of equine / / animals where zoning requirements for the keeping of said animals have been met. Individual lot owners in subdivisions shall have the option of keeping said animals without the necessity of appealing to boards of directors or homeowners' associations for amendments to me CC&Rs. 15. The Covenanls, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the / / Homeowners' Association are subject to lhe approval of the Planning and Engineering Divisions and lhe City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer. V/ 16. Allparkways, openareas, and landscaping shall beperrnanentlyrnaintained by the property / / owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 17. Solar access easements shall be dedicated for the purpose of assuming that each lot or / dwelling unit shall have the right to receive sunlight across adjacent lots or units for use of a solar energy system. The easements may be contained in a Declaration of Restrictions for the subdivision which shall be recorded concurrently with the recordation of the final map or issuance of permits, whichever comes first. 'The easements shall prohibit the casting of shadows by vegetation, structures, fixtures or any other object, except for utility wires and similar objects, pursuant to Development Code Section 17.08.060-G-2. 18. The project contains a designated Historical Landmark. The site shall be developed and / / maintained in accordance with the Historic Landmark Alteration Permit No. · Any further modifications to the site including, but not limited to, exterior alterations and/or interior alterations which affect the exteriorof the buildings or structures, removal of landmark trees, demolition, relocation, reconstruction of buildings or structures, or changes to the site, shall require a modification to the Historic Landmark Alteration Permit subject to Histodc Preservation Commission review and approval. C. Building I:)eslgn 1. An aitemative energy system is required to provide domestic hot water for all dwelling units / /'- and for heating any swimming pool or spa, unless other aitemative energy systems are demonstrated to be of equivalent capacity and efficiency. All swimming pools installed at the time of initial development shall be sul:Olemented with solar heating. Details shall be included in the building plans and shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. All dwellings shall have the front, side and rear elevations upgraded with architectural / /'- treatment, detailing and increased delineation of surface treatment subject to City Planner review and approval pdor to issuance of building permits. SC- 2/91 3 of ]2 P,~i~-, .~o. ~/.f(,,f~'.5' Com_dcdo. 3. Standard patio cover plans for use by the Homeowners' Association shall be submitted for .. / / City Planner and Building Official review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. · 4. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or / / projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent propedies and streets as required by the Planning Division. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Details shall be included in building plans. D. Parking and Vehicular Access (Indicate details on building plans) 1. All parking lit landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall / / contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking sill (including curb). 2. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be / / provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/ plazas/recreational uses. 3. All parking spaces shall be double stdped per City standards and all driveway aisles, / / entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. 4. All units shall be provided with garage door openers ff driveways are less than 18 feet in / / · depth from back of sidewalk. 5. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions shall restrict the storage of recreational vehicles / / on this site unless they are the principal source of transportation for the owner and prohibit parking on interior circulation aisles other than in designated visitor parking areas. 6. Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the City Planner, City Engineer, and / / Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval priorto issuance of building permits. E. Landscaping (for publicly rnalntalned landscape arm, refer to Section N,) v/ 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscap- / / ing in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Ranner review and approval priorto the issuance of building bennits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. v/ 2. Existing trees required t~ be preserved in place sha~~ be pmtected wi~h a c~nstruction barrier / / in accordance with the Municipal Code Section 19.08.110, and so noted on the grading plans. The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape pins. The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's recommendations regarding preseNmlin, transplanting and trimming methods. 3. Aminimumof treespergrossacre,comprisedofthefolliwingsizes, shall be provided / / within the project: % - 48- inch box or larger, % - 36- inch box or larger, __ % - 24- inch box or larger, __ % - 15-gallin, and __ % - 5 gallin. 4. A minimum of % of ties planted within the project shall be specimen size trees - / ../ 24-inch box or larger. 5. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallin tree for every three / / parking stalls, sufficient to shade 50% of the parking area at solar noon on August 21. SC - 2/9 ! 4 of 12 P~oi=t Comdcd~ ~--: .6. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of building. / / 7. All private slope banks 5 feet or less in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than /. ./ 2:1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 8. AII private slopes in excess of 5feet, but less than8 feet in vertical height and of2:l orgreater / / slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1 -gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 s:l. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope pine. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 9. For single family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continu- / / ously maintained in a healthy and thdving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer. Priorto releasing occupancy torthose units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Ranning Division to determine that they are in satisfactory condition. 10. For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are respon- / / sible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way, All landscaped areas shell be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in a healthy and thriving condition, and shell receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, deed, diseased, or decaying plant rnatedal shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage. 11. Front yard landscaping shall be required per the Developrneht Code and/or / / · This requirement shell be in addition to the required street trees and slope planting. / 12. The final design of the pedrneter perkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be / / included in the required landscape plans and shell be subject to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Division. 13. Special landscape features such as rnounding, alluvial rock, specimen size trees, meander- / / ing sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensified landscaping, is required along V/ 14. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on / / the pedrneter of this project area shell be continuously maintained by the developer. v/ 15. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, / / the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division. 16. Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for City Planner review and / / approval prior to issuance of building permits. These criteria shell encourage the natural growth characteristics of the selected tree species. 17. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the pdncipies of / / Xedsc. ape as defined in Chapter 19.16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. sc - 2/91 5 of' 12 F. Signe 1. Thesignsindicatedonthesubmittedplansareconceptualonlyandnotapartof thisapproval, . /. / ....... Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation of any signs. 2. A Uniform Sign Program for this development shall be submitted for City Planner review and / / approval pdor to issuance of building permits. 3. Directory monument sign(s) shall be provided for apartment, condominium, or townhomes / / prior to occupancy and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Division pdor to issuance of building permits. G. Environmental 1. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Fourth Street Rock / Crusher project in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. Special Studies Zone for the ~led-f.~ Fault, in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. · 3. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Foothill Freeway /. / project in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 4. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the / / issuance of building permits. The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and construction techniques provided, and if appropriate. verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures. The building plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report. H. Other Agencies 1. EmergencysecondaryaccessshallbeprovidedinaccordancewithRanchoCucamongaFire / Protection District Standards. V/ 2. Emorgencyaccessshallbeprovided, maintenancelreeandciear, a minimumof26feetwlde / / at all times during construction in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District requirements. V/' 3. Prior to issuance of building permits for combustible construction, evidence shall be / submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District that temporaW water supply for fire protection is available, pending completion of required fire protection system. v/ 4. The applicant shall contact the U. S. Postal Service Io determine the appropriate type and / / location .of mail boxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mail boxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mail boxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. V/' 5. For projects using septic tank facilities, written certification of acceptability, including all --J / supportive ihtormatlon, shall be obtained from the San Bernardino County Department of Environmental Health and submitted to the Building Official prior to the issuance of Septic Tank Permits, and prior to issuance of building permits. SC- 2/9 ], 6 of' ] 2 APPLICANTS SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (714) 989-1863, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. SIte'Development V/ 1. The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechani- / /. cal Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of issuance of relative permits. Please cornact the Building and Safety Division for copies of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential dwelling unit(s) or major addition / / to existing unit(s), the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but am not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Systems Devebpment Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fees. 3. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development or / / addition to an existing development, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: Systems Development Fee, Drainage Fee, School Fees, Permit and Plan Checking Fees. V/ 4. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building Official, aftertract/parcel map recordation / / and prior to issuance of building permits. J. Existing Structures 1. Provide compliance with the Uniform Building 'Code for the property line clearances / / considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness of existing buildings. 2. Existing buildings shall be made to cornply with correct building and zoning regulations for --J / the intended use or the building shall be demolished. 3. Existing sewage disposal facilities shall be removed, filled and/or oapped to comply with the / / Uniform Plumbing Code and Uniform Building Code. 4. Underground on-site utilities are to be iocmed and shown on building plans submitted for / / building permit application. K, Grading V~ 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City / / Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. V/ 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the Stale of Califomia to / / 3. The development is located within the soil erosion control boundaries; a Soil Disturbance / / Permit is required. Please contact San Bemardino County Department of Agriculture at (714) 387-2111 for permit application. Documentation of such permit shall be submitted to the City prior to the issuance of rough grading permit. V/ 4. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at / the time of application for grading plan check. I/" 5. Thefina~gradingp~anssha~~becompietedandappr~vedpriort~issuance~fbuiidingpermits~ / / SC- 2/9 ! 7 Of 12 6. As a custom-lit subdivision, the followir~j requirements shell be met: a. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed guaranteeing completion of all on-site / / drainage facilities necessary for dewatedr~ all parcels to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Division prior to final map approval and prior to the issuance of grading permits. b. Appropriate easements for safe disposal of drainage water that are conducted onto / / or over adjacent parcels, am to be delineated and recorded to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Division prior to issuance of grading and building permits. c. On-site drainage improvements, necessary for dewatedng and protecting the subdivided / / properties, are to be installed pdor to issuance of building permits for construction upon any parcel thet may be subject to drainage flows entering, leaving, or within a parcel relative to which a building permit is requested. d. Final grading plans for each parcel are to be submitted to the Building and Safety / / Division for approval prior to issuance of building and grading permits. (This may be on an incremental or composite basis.) e. All slope banks in excess of 5 feet in vertical height shall be seeded with native grasses / /. or planted with ground cover for erosion control upon completion of grading or some other altemative method of erosion control shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Building Official. In addition a permanent irrigaflin system shall be provided. This requirement does not release the applioant/developer from compliance with the sk:q>e plaming requirements of Section 17.08.040 1 of the Development Code. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (714) 98~-1862, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: L Dedication and Vehicular AcceM 1. Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all imerior public streets, community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or temafive map. Private easements for non-public facilities (cross-lit drainage, local feeder trails, etc.) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or teNafire map. 2.Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centermine): total feet on total feet on total feet on total teet on 3. An irrevocable offer of dedication for -foot wide roadway easement shall be made for all private streets or drives. V/ 4. Non-vehicular access shall be dedicated to the City for the following streets: ~ ~., i 5. Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&Rs i sc - 2/9 t 8 or ] 2 V/ 6. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided andshallbe delineated or noted on the final map. / / 7. The final map shall clearly delineate a 1 O-foot minimum building restriction area on the / / neighboring lot adjoining the zero lot line wall and contain the following language: 'i/We hereby dedicate to the City of Rancho Cucamonga the right to prohibit the construction of (residential) buildings (or other structures) within those areas designated on the map as building restriction areas." A maintenance agreement shall also be granted from each lot to the adjacent lot through the CC&R's. v/' 8. All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be quitclaimed or delineated on / / the final map. I/' 9. Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of-way /. /.__ shall be dedicated to the City wherever they encroach onto private property. 10. Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right tum lanes, to provide a minimum / /__ of 7 feet measured from the face of curbs. If curb adjacent sidewalk is used along the dght tum lane, a parallel street4ree maintenance easement shall be provided. 11. The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required.off-site property interests / / necessary to construct the required public improvements, and it he/she should fall to do so. the developer shall, at least 120 days prior to submittal of the final map for approval, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Government Code Section 66462 at such time as the City acquires the property interests required for the improvements. Such agreement shall provide for payment by the developer of all costs incurred by the City to acquire the off-site property interests required in connection with the subdivision. Security for a pertion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the developer, at developers cost. The appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to commancemant of the appraisal. M. Street Improvements k'/' 1. All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, / /~__ landscaped areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. 2. A minimum of 26- foot wide pavement, within a 40 -foot wide dedicated right-of-way shall be / / constnjcted for all half-section streets. 3. Construct the following perimeter street irrq:~mvements including, but not limited to: / / STREET NAME CUI~ & A.C. SIDE DRIVE STREET ~ COMM. MEDIAN OTHER GUT~R PVMT WALK APPR, LIGHTS TREE~ TRAIL BLAND p,x,~ No. :~f/4~t~' Notes: (a) M~ian island inctu~es ~andsca~i~ a~ ~ion on m~t~t. (~) ~av~m~m t~m~n a~ overlays wfi~ be dei~m~ Ou~ plan c~. (c) U ~ ma~, s~e- wa~ shaft ~ ~finear ~r STD. 304. (~) ff ~ ~, an mqleu o~ ~nstm~ion ~e s~aU ~ proved for this ~em. 4. Improvement plans and construction: a. Street improvement plans including street trees and street lights, prepared by a regis- / / tered Civil Engineer, shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attomey guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improve- mehts, prior to final map approval orthe issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being padormed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a / / construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other parrnits required. c. Paverneht striping, marking, traffic, street name signing, and interconnect conduit / / shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signalconduitwithpullbexesshallbeinstalledonanynewconstructionorreconstruction / / of major, secondary or collector streets which intersect with other major, secondaW or collector streets for future traffic signals. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: / / (1) AJI pull boxes shall be No. 6 unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. (2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pullrope. e. VVheel chair romps shall be installed on all four comers of intersections per City / / Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with / / adequate detours cludng construction. A street closure permit may be required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon cornpletion of the construction to the satislaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be / / installed to City Standards, except for single family lots. h. Handicap access ramp design shall be as specified by the City Engineer. / / i. Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check. / / 5. Street imlxovemaht plans per City Standards for all private streets shall be provided for / / review and approval by the City Engineer. Prior to any work being pedormed on the pd- vate streets, fees shall be paid and construction permits shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required. V/ 6. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in / / accordance with the City's street tree program. SC - 2/91 1Oof 12 7. Intersection line of site designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with Co~dcdo. adopted policy. / /__ a. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, / /- including driveways. Walls, signs, and slopes shall be located outside the lines of sight. Landscaping and other obstructions within the lines of sight shall be approved by the City Engineer. b. Local residential street intersections shall have their noticeability improved, usually by / / moving the 2 +/- closest street trees on each side away from the street and placed in a street tree easement. 8. A permit shall be obtained from CALTRANS for any work within the following right-of-way: / / 9. All public improvements on the following streets shall be operationally complete prior to the / / issuance of building permits: N. Public Maintenance Areas / 1. A separate set of~_-__-d~-:-2~: ;.-~ ;z,;.~..;;,,,~ plans per Engineering Public Works Standards / / shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. The following landscape parkways, medians, paseos, easements, trails, or other areas are required to be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance District: 2. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/orform the appropriate Landscape and Lighting / / Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be berne by the developer, 3. All required public landscaping and irrigation systems shall be continuously maintained by the / /'- developer until accepted by the City. 4. Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective ./ / Beautffication Master Ran: O. Drainage and Flood Comrol 1. The project (or portions thereof) is iocatecl within a Flood Hazard Zone; therefore, flood / / protection measures shall be provided as certified by a registered Civil Engineer and appmved by the City Engineer. 2. It shall be the developer's responsibility to have the current FIRM Zone Z2 / / designation removed from the project area. The cleveloper's engineer shall prepare all necessary reports, plans, and hydrologic/hydraulic calculations. A Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) shall be obtained from FEMA prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs tirst. A Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) shall be issued by FEMA prior to occupancy or improvement acceptance, whichever occurs first. ~ 3. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final /'/'- map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. sc -2/91 iI orl2 4. A perrrdt from the County Flood Control District is required for work within its right-of-way. V/ 5. Trees am prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe / / measured from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk. / / I// 6. Public storm drain easemems shall be graded to convey overflows in the event of a / / blockage in a sump catch basin on the public street. P, UtlIItLSs v/ 1. Provide separate utilily services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, /... / gas, electric power, lelephone, and cable 'IV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. V/ 2.The developer shall be responsible for the relocatlon of existing utilities as necessary. / / V/ 3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the / /. Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and lhe Environmental Health Departmere of the County of Sen Bemardino. A letter of compliance from the CCWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Q. General Requirements and ApprovaLs 1. The separate parcels contained within the project boundaries shall be legally combined into "/'' / one parcel prior to issuance of building parrafts. 2. An easement for a joint use driveway shall be provided prior to final map approval or / / issuance of building parrnits, whichever occurs first, for: / / 3. Prior to approval of the final map a deposit shall be posted with the City covedng the estimated cost of apportioning the assessments under Assessment District among the newly created parcels. 4. Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Regional Mainline, Secondary' Regional, and Master Plan / /.__ Drainage Fees shall be paid prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved. v"' 5. Permits shall be obtained from the following agencies for work within their right-of-way: / 6. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or lorm the Law Enforcement Community / Facilities District shall be flied with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the Developer. 7. Prior to ~nalization of any development phase, suffident irnprovemant plans shall be corn- / / pINed beyond the phase boundaries to assure secondary access and drainage protection to the satisfaction Of the City Engineer. Phase boundaries shall correspond to lot lines shown on the appmved tentative map. SC - 2/91 12of 12 " 8.4 MITIGATION MEASURES LANDFORMANDTOPOGRAPHY 1. Project implementation shall comply with all grading provisions contained within the City's adopted Hillside Development Regulations. These regulations provide standards for revegetation of slopes, limitations on earthwork during the rainy season, setbacks for slope maintenance, slope ratios, areas of cut and ~H, allowed fill depths, use of retaining walls, and other standards. Responsible Agency:. City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Grading Permit 2. Project implementation shall comply with all relevant standards fxom the Uniform Building Code pertaining to earthwork, grading, erosion control, soft compaction and other standards. These standards shall also apply to the selection, storage and maintenance of equipment used in grading and associated internal and off-site haul routes. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Grading Permit 3. As part of the submittal to the City for a Grading Permit, the applicant shall provide an approved erosion control and silt retention plan. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Grading Permit 4. In the event that cut and fill volumes are not balanced on site, the applicant shah submit to the City a plan describing haul routes for off-site disposal of excess cut materials. This plan shall be approved by the City prior to issuance of a Fading pernaiL Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Grading Permit 5. Any permits, approvals and environmental review required for construction of domestic water facilities shall be provided separately by Cucamonga County Water District. Responsible Agency: Cucarnonga County Water District Implementation Timing: Prior to Approval of Projects to Construct Additional Facilities 6. In the event that any earthwork is proposed to occur within the Cucamonga Canyon Wash flood control easement, the applicant shall obtain an Encroachment Permit from the San Bernardino County Transportation/Flood Control DistricL Respons~le Agency: San Bernardino County Transportation/Flood Control District. Implementation Tuning: If required, Encroachment Permit to be obtained from the County prior to City of Rancho Cucamonga issuance of Grading Permit GEOLOGY AND SOILS Faulting 7. No human occupied structures shall be built within the seismic exclusion zone. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Building Permit 58 8. The project design shall conform with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code requirements as well as the recommendations of the Structural Engineers Association for mitigation of seismic shaking. Responsible Agency:. City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Tuning: Building Permit 9. A numerical coefficient for site-structure resonance of 1.0 shah be utilizecL Responsible Agency:. City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Building Permit 10. As required by the Hillside Development Regulations, a statement shall be provided on the deeds informing homebuyers that the site is in an Alquist Priolo Special Studies Zone and subject to potential seismic hazards. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Certificates of Use and Occupancy 11. Project implementation shall comply with all measures identified in the report prepared by RMA, including the requirement that final plans be reviewed by the geotechnical consultant to ensure that changes and revisions are made where necessary. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Grading Permit 12. All grading shall be performed in accordance with all applicable City of Rancho Cucamonga requirements. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Grading Permit 13. Building pad areas extending 5 feet beyond the exterior footings shall be undercut 1.0 feet below the bottom of the proposed footings. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Tuning: Building Permit 14. Oversize earth materials shah not be placed within 10-feet of finish grade without approval of the geotechnical consultant. Responsible Agency:. City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Grading Permit 15. Setbacks from the top of the cliff shah utilize a 1.5 to 1 slope configuration, plus a 150- foot building setback from the top of the bank of Cucamonga Creek. Responsible Agency:. City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Tuning: Grading Permit 16. Fill slopes of 2 to 1 slope shall not exceed 40-feet in height without geotechnical review and approval All fill over cut slopes shall be cut back one full equipment width into the rum underlying soft layers and constructed as compacted rill slopes. Responsible Agency:. City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Grading Permit 59 17. A slope maintenance program shall be developed and implemented to control erosion and debris flows. Such program shah include an on-going rodent control program to minimize the slope-weakening effects of rodent burrowing. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Grading Permit 18. Footings having a minimum width of 12-inches and placed a minimum of 12 inches below the lowest adjacent grade shall have a soil bearing value of 1800 pounds per square foot. This value may be increased by 20% for each additional foot of width or depth to a maximum value of 3000 pounds per square foot. (Reinforcement of footings for soil expansion is not required.) Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Grading Permit 19. Soils engineering observation and testing shah be conducted upon completion of clearing and grubbing; during excavation and overexcavation in alluvial soil areas; during all phases of rough grading; and when any unusual conditions are encountered during grading. A f'mal soils engineering report shall be submitted to the City upon completion of grading. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Monitoring During Project Grading, and Report submittal on Completion of Grading. HYDROLOGY 20. Tr 14475 drainage improvements shah conform to aH standards established by the City for intercepting and conducting onsite and offsite tributary flows around or through the site to the Almond Interceptor Channel, including adequate protection for adjacent and downstream properties. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Grading Permit 21. Drainage improvements shall conform with all requirements established by the San Bernardino County Transportation/Flood Control Department. Responsible Agency: County of San Bernardino Implementation Timing: During Review of Maps and Plans, and as part of Encroachment Permit (if required) 22.. The portion of the site within the Cucamonga Creek drainage shall be covered by an adequate City drainage easement. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Grading Permit 2.3. A minimum 150 foot building setback shah be established from the top of the bank of Cucamonga Creek. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Grading Permit 24. A stringent program of slope and erosion control shah be undertaken by the developer to prevent damage to the site and downstream properties during heavy storm runoffs, especially during construction. Responsible Agency:. City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Grading Permit 2S. A permit. shah be obtained from the County in the event project implementation will require encroachment onto Flood Control Department right-of-way. Responsible Agency: County of San Bernardino Transportation/Flood Control Department (if required) Implementation Timing: Prior to initiation of earthwork inside the County right-of-way CULTURAL RESOURCES 26. A qualified archaeologist shah monitor brush-clearing and earth-moving operations in the vicinity of SBr-3004, and shah determine the area to be so monitored. In the event that monitoring yields evidence of archaeological resources, the archaeologist shall evaluate the significance of the resources. If deemed appropriate on the basis of this evaluation, the archaeologist shah develop a mitigation program. These measures shall be implemented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga (or its contractors), and funded by the project applicanL Responsible Agency:. City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Grading Permit 27. Regardless of the outcome of the mitigation measure above, the following additional steps have been developed by the Native American Heritage Society and shall be undertaken immediately upon discovery of human remains at the construction site: a) In the event of discovery of human remains, there shall be no further excavation or disturbance if the site or any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent remains until the San Bernardino County Coroner has determined, in accordance with Chapter 10 of Part 3 of Division 2 of Title 3 of the Government Code, that the remains are not subject to the provisions of Section 27491 of the Government Code or any other related provisions of law and recommendations concerning the disposition of such remains have been made to the City of Rancho Cucamonga in the manner provided in Section 5097.98 of the Public Resources Code. The coroner shall make a determination within two working days from the date of notification. b) If the coroner determines that the remains are not subject to his or her authority and also recognizes the human remains to be those of a Native American, the coroner shah contact the Native American Heritage Commission by telephone within 24 hours. Respons~le Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: During Grading and Construction AIR QUAHTY 28. Concurrent with the application for a grading permit, the applicant shall propose suppression measures for fugitive dust in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building Code requirements. These measures shall be incorporated as conditions of the grading permit. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Grading Permit BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES 29. The applicant shah comply with aH provisions regarding landscaping as provided in the City's adopted Hillside Development Regulations. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Recordation of Tentative Tract Map 30. The applicant shall avoid damaging or removing mature native coast live oaks from their locations on site. Efforts to avoid damage shah include (1) irrigation that prevents overwatering or underwatering of native oaks; (2) avoidance of soft compaction above the root zone; (3) preservation of adequate drainage; (4) prohibition on use of weed inhibitors (during road paving) in the vicinity of oak trees. ff native oak trees are removed as a result of site preparation, they shall be replaced by boxed specimens in compatible areas to be selected by a qualified expert. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Building Permit 31. Revegetation shall be accomplished on all Faded and cut and ~H areas where structures or improvements are not constructed. Preference shah be given to the use of drought- adapted, fire-retardhnt plant materials, especially species native to the southern California foothills. Use of these materials shall be contingent on availability of seed stocks and approval of appropriate fire management agencies. If landscaping requires irrigation for growth, consideration shah be given to use of water injection systems. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Building Permit 32. Measures shah be taken to minimize entry of construction sediments into drainages. Hydroseeding shall be practices with use of rapid-developing, soil-anchoring groundcover and strategic placements of runoff-retaining structures. Responsible Agency:. City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Grading Permit 33. The Homeowners' Association for 'IF 14475 shall be responsible for ensuring that aH on- and off-site open space areas are buffered in a manner to discourage encroachment by the new human population. Measures shall include but not be limited to (1) fencing-off of the sandy wash to discourage off-road vehicle and other use of this area, and (2) posting of interpretive signage at the wash edge to education residents about the sensitivity of this habitat for plants and animal species. Trail systems shall be designed to protect these areas from human use, the enforcement of which shall be the responsibility of the Homeowners' Association as well as the City, and shall not terminate at the boundaries of open space areas. The applicant shah incorporate, and the Homeowners' Association enforce, deed restrictions that regulate the management of household pets and the operation of motorized off-wad vehicles. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga; Homeowners' Association Implementation Timing: Recordation of Tentative Tract Map and On-going 34. Night lighting shall be screened from intrusion into open space areas by means of restricted placement, and/or low-intensity bulbs, and/or low elevation and hooded standards, and/or shielding by internal silvering of the glove or external opaque reflectors. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implemeritation T'tming: Certificates of Use and Occupancy C_y~\~62 ON-SITE AND SURROUNDING LAND USES 35. The applicant shall submit to the City a recorded property line survey showing all boundaries along the northerly property boundaries as prepared by a licensed land surveyor. Comers shall be monumented in accordance with State law. Any lots having a common line with the National Forest shall have that line permanently and visibly posted and monumenteeL As indicated in correspondence from the Forest Service, the current site plan would require posting only along the north line of Lot B. This survey shall also determine the status of the three private parcels on the northern site boundary (parcels 200-051-08, -09, and -12). If appropriate based on survey findings and an analysis of the buildability of the lots, additional mitigation measures shall be developed to assure that these parcels do not become landlocked as a consequence of TT 14475 implementation. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Grading Permit 36. The City shall require that the applicant revise the internal trail system to eliminate discontinuous trail termini along the National Forest boundary, and shall consider an integrated loop trail along the project perimeter. The backbone trail along Cucamonga Canyon Wash shall be fenced on both sides, and pulled back approximately 15 to 25 feet from the top of the canyon wall. The Homeowners' Association shall be responsible for posting all trails with signs stating that no riding is permitted off of project trails, off of Big Tree Road, or in the Cucamonga Canyon Wash. Respons~le Agencies: City of Rancho Cucamonga; Homeowners' Assocation Implementation Timing: Grading Permit 37. The project proposal shall be considered by the Grading Review Committee, the Technical Review Committee, the Trails Advisory Committee, and the Design Review Committee for consistency with the City General Plan and Development Code (including the Hillside Development Regulations). Requirements developed through these reviews shall be incorporated as conditions of project approval and implemented by the applicant. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Grading Permit 38. During these review proce~es, it is recommended that the City give close attention to the following areas that have been found to be potentially in conflict with relevant plans: (1) layout of streets and residences that does not maximize access to solar energy; (2) circulation system omition of split roadways and shared driveways; (3) building heights and envelopes that may exceed Hillside Regulation standards; (4) trail locations and termini that may conflict with conservation goals as expressed by the Forest Service and project biologists; (5) design modifications to accommodate public use of Big Tree Road, including parking, security and screening; (6) compliance with fill depth requirements and retaining wall heights; (7) pad placement on Lots #40, 48, 49, 53, 54, 62, 66 and 67, that may result in significant.grading requirements; and (8) pad placement on lots adjacent to Cucamonga Creek to ensure compliance with the 150-foot building setback from the top of Cucamonga Creek (the pad for Lot 11 appears to conflict with this provision). Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Grading Permit TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION 39. Any use of, modification of, encroachment onto, relocation or, or impacts upon the Forest Road 1N34 (Big Tree Road) will require advance coordination with the Forest Service. Responsible Agencies: City of Rancho Cucamonga; U.S. Forest Service Implementation Timing: Grading Permit 40. The current sunset-to-sunrise closure of Forest Road 1N34 and Party Point will be maintained by both the City and the Forest Service to preclude resumption of illegal uses. The City shall coordinate with the Forest Service regarding potential impacts of the project on these agreements, and the City shall in turn coordinate with the applicant regarding any actions required on the part of Sahama Investments or future residents of TT 14475 to ensure that the closures are enforced. Responsible Agencies: City of Rancho Cucamonga; U.S. Forest Service Implementation T'tming: Prior to Project Approval (communication); On-going (enforcement of closure) 41. The deeds to all lots within TT 14475 shall clearly notify buyers of the status of Big Tree Road as a public passageway pursuant to Federal Law, and contain clear notification of potential exposure to noise, traffic and public visitation resulting from this legal access. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Certificates of Use and Occupancy 42. To partially mitigate the cumulative adverse impacts associated with increased development along the National Forest boundary, the City shall invite the Forest Service to prepare an environmental handout that addresses public use and adjacent residential issues in an informational and educational manner. The City shall require the developer to provide a copy of this handout to all new property owners within the TT 14475 project. Responsible Agencies: City of Rancho Cucamonga; U.S. Forest Service Implementation Timing: Grading Permit (invitation) and During Home Sales Program (handout distribution) 43. The City and the U.S. Forest Service shall take the following measures to reduce conflicts between recreational and residential interests: (1) maintaining the connection to Big Tree Road at 'D" Street to reduce the distance recreational vehicles must travel in the tract; and (2) Posting 'No Recreational Vehicle Parking" signs within Tr 14475 where necessary. Additionally, the City and the U.S. Forest Service shall consider implementation of the following measure (or other means): (3) Erecting a protective barrier along segments of Big Tree Road that adjoin TT 14475 residential lots. Such barrier shall be placed and designed in conjunction with Forest Service consultation- Responsible Agencies: City of Rancho Cucamonga; U.S. Forest Service Implementation Timing: Grading Permit (connection to Big Tree RcL and protective barriers); Certi~cate~ of Use and Occupancy (signs) 44. Consistent with General Plan requirements for private roads, the City Engineer shall review and approve the final site plan. The plan shall provide security gates at all points of entry; maintenance and operation costs shall be ~olely at the expense of project homeowners. If the circulation system is proposed to be public, the project road system will be revised to conform fully with City standards for public roads. During Design Review, the City will determine whether the circulation system complies with relevant fire protection standards and will incorporate modifications if required based on this review. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Recordation of Final Map PUBLIC SERVICES AND UTILITIES Fire Protection 45. Dead-end streets that are to be extended at a future date shall be designed as temporary culs-de-sac to provide for adequate turn-around diameters for emergency vehicles. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Recordation of Final Map 445. All standards of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District shall be implemented. Additionally, the applicant shall retain a wildland fire consultant during project design. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Grading Permit 47. All proposed development shall satisfy the structural fire protection standards contained in the most recent adopted edition of the Uniform Building Code and Uniform Fire Code. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Building Permit 48. Fire protection water systems and fire hydrants necessary to serve the project within the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Dlstrict's minimum response time shall be in place and operational prior to delivery of materials for building construction. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Building Permit 49. Recommendations contained in the 1991 Phase One Wildland Fire Safety_ Repor~ for the project shall be implemented, and the Phase Two report shall be completed prior to final map recordation. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Recordation of Final Map 50. Clearly marked house numbers shah be incorporated into project design standards. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Tuning: Building Permit 51. The San Bernardino County Sheriffs Department shall be consulted prior to project implementation to assess the need for additional department personnel and equipment, and to obtain information on crime prevention measures that can be incorporated into project design. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Building Permit 52. Domestic water storage and distribution facilities necessary to serve the project site shah be provided in accordance with CCWD requirements. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Issuance of Will Serve Letter 53. The project shall incorporate water conservation measures as required by state law, including but not limited to low-volume toilets, shower-heads and faucets, insulation of water lines in water recirculating systems, and plumbing materials and techniques (please refer to the attachment to the NOP response from the Department of Water Resources for a comprehensive list of required and recommended water conservation measures). Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Building Permit 54. On-site pump and pressure tank systems shall be provided for Lots 47 through 53 if required to ensure adequate water pressures. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga, Cucamonga County Water District Implementation Timing: Grading Permit 55. Ac, c,e~ to Reservoir 7A shall meet with the approval of CCWD officials. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga, Cucamonga County Water District Implementation Timing: Grading Permit Wastewater 56. The proposed onsite sewage disposal system shall be reviewed and approved by the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board prior to project approval. This review will require that percolation tests be performed by the applicant to establish the suitability of on-site soils for septic leaching, and to determine if potential water quality impacts would result from use of an on-site septic tank system. Responsible Agency: Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board and City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Grading Permit Schools 57. As required by state law, the applicant shall pay per unit fees for the funding of educational programs. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Grading Permit 58. Prior to recordation of the final map, a meeting shall be held between the City, school district officials and the applicant to determine whether additional assistance will be required to serve students generated by the TT 14475 project. Such measures, if needex[, could include supplemental funding agreements or participation in a community facilities district to generate additional revenues for education. Respons~le Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Recordation of Final Map No mitigation measures are required or proposed. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW FOR VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 14475, A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF 71 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS ON 113 ACRES OF LAND IN THE HILLSIDE RESIDENTIAL (LESS THAN 2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) AND OPEN SPACE DISTRICTS, LOCATED NORTH OF ALMOND AVENUE BETWEEN SAPPHIRE AND TURQUOISE STREETS, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 200-051-07, 55, 56, and 57. A. Recitals. (i) Sahama Investments has filed an application for the Design Review of Vesting Tentative Tract No. 14475 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter, the subject Design Review request is referred to as "the application." (ii) On March 25, 1992, and continued to April 8, 1992, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a meeting to consider the application. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meetings on March 25 and April 8, 1992, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and (b) That the proposed design is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and (c) That the proposed design is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and (d) That the proposed design, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. VTT14475-DESIGN REVIEW - SAHAMA INVESTMENTS April 8, 1992 Page 2 3. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs I and 2 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planninu Division: 1) All applicable mitigation measures identified in the Section 8 of the Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report shall be incorporated into the final plans. A copy of said mitigations are attached as Exhibit "A." 2) Native landscape materials shall be used on all slopes to be landscaped. The plant species shall be coordinated with any requirements of the Wildland Fire Study prepared for the project. The final plans shall be reviewed and app~oved by the City Planner prior to issuance of building permits. 3) The retaining wall along the water tank access road shall be treated to blend in with the natural area. The final plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. 4) Further refinements shall be made in the final grading plans to create a more natural and less manufactured appearance. The final plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of grading permits. 5) To accommodate the Community Trail on the north side of Street "C," three 5-foot retaining walls, with decorative finishes, shall be used to take up the grade. The final plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of grading permits. 6) The grading of Lot 70 shall be revised to allow vehicle access on the north side of the unit. A minimum 12 foot wide area, clear to the sky, shall be provided. The final plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of grading permits. 7) Water bars shall be provided on all north-south local trails for erosion control. The final plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of grading permits. 8) Tree Removal Permit No. 92-06 is approved subject to replacement planting at a one-to-one ratio in a size and species to the satisfaction of the City Planner prior to occupancy release. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. VTT14475-DESIGN REVIEW - SAHAMA INVESTMENTS April 8, 1992 Page 3 4. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF APRIL 1992 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of April 1992, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: SUBJECT: ~'/ APPLICANT: LocAT,oN: Those items checked are Conditions of Approval. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DNISION, (714) 989-1861, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. Time Limits 1.Approval shell expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, if building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 24 months from the date of approval. 2. Development/Design Review shell be approved prior to I / 3. Approval of Tentative Tract No. is granted subject to the apl;N'oval of 4. The developer shall commence, participate in, and consummate or cause to be commenced, / / participated in, or consummated, a Mello-Roos Community Fadlitles District (CFD) for the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District to finance construction and/or maintenance of a fire station to serve the development. The station stall be located, designed, and built to all specifications of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and shall become the Districts property upon completion. The equipment shall be selected by the Distdct in accordance with its needs. In any building of a station, the developer shell comply with all applicable laws and regulalions. The CFD shell be formed by the District and the developer by the time recordation of the final map occurs. 5. Prior to recordation of the final map or the issuance of building permitS, whichever comes / / first, the applicant shell consent to, or participate in, the establishment of a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District for the constructbn and maintenance of necessary school facilities. However, ff any school district has previously established such a Community Fadlities District, the applicant shall, in the alternative, consent to the annextalon of the project site into the territory of such existing District prior to the recorclaticn of the final map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes first. Further, it the affected school district has not formed a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District within twelve months from the date of approval of the project and prior to the recordatlon of the final map or issuance of building permits for said project, this condition shell be deemed null and void. SC- 2/9 1 I Co,.dcdo. ~iS ~ion shall ~ wa~ ff the C~ r~eives noti~ that the a~l~nt a~ all affe~ ~1 diodes ~ve emer~ into an agme~m to p~te~ a=m~date any a~ all sc~ol i~s as a re~ of this ~j~. 6. Prbr to retardation of the final m~ or p~r to issua~ of ~ildi~ ~s when ~ mp is / / involved, w~en cenffmt~n from the affed~ wmer dim~ thin ad~uate sewer and wmer facil~ies are or will ~ avail~le to sere the pm~s~ pmj~ sMII ~ submiU~ to the De~mem of Commn~y Devebpmem. Such i~er mum have been issu~ by the wmer dimr~ w~hin 90 days prbr to fill m~ a~mval in the ~e of su~Wis~n or pr~rto issua~e of ~s in the ~se of all other ms~emial pmj~s. B. Sl~ Deve~ / 1. ~e s~e shall ~ deve~ a~ maintain~ in a~m~ w~h the ~mved ~ans wh~h / / i~de sRe plans, a~e~uml e~vat~, e~edor ~e~ls a~ ~bm, la~ng, s~n ~mm, a~ gradi~ on fi/in t~ Planni~ D~n, the ~R~ns ~mai~ herein, Deve~pmem C~e mgulm~, a~ S~ P~n ~ Plann~ Commune. 2. P~r to any use of the pmj~ s~e or ~si~ a~iW bei~ ~mmn~d ther~n, all / / Co~ions of ~mval s~ll ~ ~mp~t~ to t~ ~ti~n of t~ C~ Pl~r. 3.' ~~ofthefadl~s~l~t~mm~umil~timBallUnffo~Bui~i~a~ / / State Rm Mamhall's r~lm~ ~ ~en ~i~ dh. P~r to ~~, m~ shall ~ subm~ to the Ra~ C~m~a Rm P~n D~ a~ t~ Bui~i~ a~ Safety D~is~n to ~w ~mplia~. T~ ~i~i~ ~il ~ i~~ for m~~ pdor to ~ 4. Revis~ s~e plans a~ ~i~i~ elevm~ i~~i~ all ~~ of ~val shall ~ / subm~ for C~ Planner mvie a~ ;vl ~r to ~a~ of bui~i~ ~its. 5. All s~e, grading, la~, i~at~n, a~ ~t i~vemm ~ans shall ~ ~ffiinat~ for / / ~nsistemy p~r to ~sua~ of ~ ~m (m~ as gr~i~, tree mmval, e~roachmem, ~i~i~, inc.), or ~or to fi~ ~ ~vl in t~ ~e of a mmom ~t su~is~n, or ~d use ~s ~mm~, wh~r ~ms tim. 6. ~val of ~is r~em sll m wa~e ~m ~ il s~m of t~ ~ve~mm / / ~. all other a~i C~ ~i~, a~ a~i ~mmn~ Pla~ or S~cff~ Pi~ in eff~ ~ t~ tim of ~i~i~ Pe~ ma~. 7. A detail~ on~e I~Mi~ ~ shall ~ ~iw~ a~ ~ved ~ t~ C~ Pinnet a~ / / S~'s ~anmem (~11 ) p~r to t~ ma~ of ~i~i~ ~m. S~h plan shall i~te ~e, illuminm~n, ~n, ~M, ~ mt~ of shi~i~ ~ u ~t to a~emely aff~ ~em ~fi~s. / 8. If ~ cemral~ tr~h m~des am ~, all trash ~-up s~ll ~ for i~i~ual un ~s / / w~h all r~e~es ~ from ~ v~. 9. Trash r~~(s) am r~ir~ a~ s~ll m~ C~ ma~. ~ fill ~s~n, mt~ns, / a~ me m~r of ~Bh ~is s~ll ~ ~ to C~ P~r mv~ a~ ~mval p~r to issuan~ of ~i~i~ ~s. / 10. All gm~-mum~ util~ a~de~s ~ as tmn~o~m, AC ~ndensem, etc., shall / .~ ~t~ out of publ~ view a~ ad~ume~ ~me~ thm~h the use of a ~mination of ~rete or m~n~ walls, ~i~, an~or la~i~ to the smisfad~n of the C~y Planner. ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ - 2/9 1 2 11. Street names shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to ai:~roval of the final map. 12. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination. 13. A detailed plan indicating trail widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fendr,j, and weed control, in accordance with City Master Trail drawings, shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to approval and recordation of the Final Tract Map and prior to approval of street improvement and grading plans. Developer shall upgrade and construct all trails, including fencing and drainage devices, in conjunction with street improvements. 14. The Covenants. Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs) shall not prohibit the keeping of equine animals where zoning requirements forthe keeping of said animals have been met. Individual lot owners in subdivisions shall have the option of keeping said animals without the necessity of appealing to boards of directors or homeowners' associations for amendments to the CC&Rs. 15. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of lhe Planning and Engineering Divisions and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrently with lhe Final Map or prior to the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer. v/" 16. All parkways, open area, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means ar.,eptabie to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 17. Solar access easements shall be dedicated for the purpose of assuming that each lot or dwelling unit shall have the right to receive sunlight across adjacent lots or units for use of a solar energy system. The easements may be contained in a Daclaratlon of Restrictions for the subdivision which shall be recorded concurrently with the recordation of the final map or issuance of permits, whichever comes first. The easements shall prohibit the casting of shadows by vegetation, structures, fixtures or any other object, except for utility wires and similar objects, pursuant I0 Deveicpment Code Section 17.O8.060-G-2. 18. The project contains a designated Historical Landmark. 'The site shall be devebped and maintained in accordance with the Historic Landmark Alteration Permit No. · Any further rnoditications to the site including, bul not limited to, exterior alterations and/or interior alterations which affect the exterior of the buildings or structures, removal of landmark trees, demolitbn, relocation, reconstruction of buildings or structures, or changes to the site, shall require a modification Io the Historic Landmark Alteration Permit subject to Historic Presentation Commission review and approval. C. Building Design 1. An aiternalive energy system is required to provide domestic hot water for all dwelling units and lor heating any swimming pool or spa, unless other alternative energy systems are demonstrated Io be of equivalent capacity and efficiency. All swimming pools installed at the time of initial development shall be supplemented with solar heating. Details shall be included in the building plans and shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. All dwellings shall have the front, side and rear elevations upgraded with architectural treatment, detailing and increased delineation of sudace treatment subject to City Planner review and approval prior to issuance ol building permits. 8. Standa~ pat~ ~ver ~ans ~or us~ ~ ~ H~m~wn~' ~im~n shaft ~ su~m~ ~r / / C~ Pin~r a~ Bui~i~ ~¢ial review a~ ~pmval p~r to iBua~e of ~i~i~ ~s. 4. All ~f ~u~ena~es, indudi~ air ~bnem a~ other ~f mum~ ~uip~nt a~or / / pmje~bns, shall ~ shie~ from view a~ t~ sound ~er~ from adjacent pm~ffies a~ streets as r~uir~ by the Planni~ Divisbn. Such ~reening shall ~ amh~umlly im~rat~ w~h the ~i~i~ des~n a~ ~m~ to the sai~a~bn of the C~y Planner. Details shall ~ ind~ in ~ildi~ pi~. D. Pa~lng a~ Veh~ulr Ac~u (Indite dmli on bulMing plans) 1. All B~i~ bt ~~ isla~s s~ll ~ve a miniram o~s~ dimensbn of 6 feet a~ shall / / ~main a 12-i~h wa~ adja~m to t~ pa~i~ stall (i~i~ ~). 2. Te~ur~ ~e~n ~t~ays a~ te~ur~ ~vemm ~mss cir~lmbn ais~s shall ~ / / pmv~ed thmug~ t~ ~vemm to ~nn~ ~elli~un~i~i~ w~h ~n s~ce~ plua~r~reatbnal uses. 3. All ~ing ~a~s shall ~ ~ble st~ ~r C~ ~a~a~ a~ all d~ay aisles, / / emra~es, a~ ex~s shall ~ ~ ~r C~ ~a~a~. 4. All un~s shall ~ pmv~ed w~h garage ~r ~ ~ d~ays are less t~ 18 feet in / / d~h from ~ of s~alk 5. ~eCove~ms,~~a~Res~s~llm~ffiestora~ofr~ret~naiveh~les / / on this s~e unless t~y are t~ ~1 ~ of tmn~t~n for ~ ow~r a~ ~hib~ ~i~ on inter~r cim~n aisles ot~r than in des~ v~or ~i~ areas. 6. P~ for any s~ ~tes s~ll ~ ~~ for t~ C~ P~nner, CiW E~ineer, a~ / /.-- Ra~ C~m~ Fire Pmt~n D~ mviw aM ;vN ~rto is~a~ of ~ildi~ ~es. E. ~nd~plng (f~ publlc~ miNI/i~ arm, mlr m ~lon N.) ~ 1. A ~tail~ la~ aM i~n plan, im~i~ sl ~ami~ ~ ~el ~m la~ / / i~ in t~ ~se of ms~l devemm, s~l N ~~ by a I~nBd la~ amh~ and ~b~ for C~ Ran~r m~ aM a~al ~rto tN i~a~ of ~i~i~ ~s or pmr fiMI ~ ~vi in t~ Mse of a ~mom ~t ~i~n. ~ 2. ~imi~ trees ~ir~ to N ~ew~ in p~ sM~ N ~t~ dh a ~nst~n ~ffier / / in a~ffia~ w~ t~ Mun~l ~ ~ 19.~. 110, ~ ~ mt~ on tN gradi~ plans. ~e ~n of ~se tr~ to N ~e~ in m ~ n~ ~i~ for ~plam~ trees s~ll N s~n on t~ ~ti~ I~ pi~. ~ ~m ~il fol~ all of t~ a~rist's r~mm~ ~ffii~ ~eHwm~n, ~imi~ a~ td~i~ mt~s. 3. Aminimmof tres~rgmssm,~~of~fol~s~es, sMIl~pm~d~ / / w~hin t~ mjffi: % - ~- i~h ~x or I~r, % - 3~ i~ ~x or i~er, __ % - 24- i~h ~x or i~r, % - 15~i~n, ~ __ % - 5 galen. 4. A ~nimm of % of trees ~am~ wHhin the ~ ~all N ~mn s~e trees - ./ / 24-i~ ~x or la~er. 5. ~hin ~i~ ~ts, trees s~ll ~ ~am~ m a rme of one l~l~n tr~ for e~ throe / pami~ malls, ~ff~iem to ~a~ 5~/~ of t~ ~i~ area m ~ir =n on Augurn 21. SC - 2/91 4 prvicc~ 6. Trees shall ~ ~la~ in areas of ~u~l~ view adjace~ Io a~ a~nG slm~ures al a rate ol one tree ~r BO li~ar feel of ~i~i~. / / / 7. All p~ate s~ ba~s 5 let or less in venal he~ht a~ of 5:1 or ginate r s~, b~ le~ than / / 2:1 s~, shall be, m miniram, i~at~ a~ land~ w~h ~mpdate gmu~ ~ver for emsbn ~ml. SIo~ plami~ r~uir~ by this s~bn shall i~lude a pe~nem i~atbn sy~em to ~ in~all~ by the deve~r p~r to ~n~. 8. AII p~ate s~s in excessof Sfeet, b~lessthan8 feet inve~l he;ffi andof2:l orgreater / / sb~ shall be la~d a~ iffigat~ for emsbn ~mrol a~ to soften t~ir a~ara~ as fol~: one 15~albn or la~er s~e tree ~r each 150 ~. ~. of sb~ area, l~albn or la~er s~e shrub ~r each 100 ~. ~. of s~ area. ~d ~m~ie grou~ ~ver. In a~ion, s~ ~nks in ex~ss of 8 feet in ve~l heigM a~ of 2:1 or greater s~ shall al~ i~lude one 5~albn or la~er s~e tree ~r each 250 ~. ~. of s~ area. Trees a~ shm~ shall ~ plam~ in ~a~ered clu~em to ~en aM va~ s~ ~ne. SIo~ ~aNi~ r~uir~ by this s~ion shall i~lude a ~nem i~atbn sytem to ~ in~all~ by t~ develo~r p~r to ~~y. 9. For si~ fami~ res~emial deve~pmm, all s~ ~ami~ a~ i~bn shall ~ ~mi~- / / ous~ mintain~ in a hea~hy a~ thdvi~ ~Hbn by t~ ~velr umil e~h i~Mdual un~ is ~ a~ ~p~d by t~ ~yer. P~r to mi~i~ o~pa~ for t~ u nHs, an in~bn shall ~ ~u~ by the Ranni~ D~i~n to dete~ t~ they are in smida~o~ 10. For ~H~fami~ ms~em~l aM mn-res~emil ~vemN, pm~ ~ are resin- / / si~e for the ~minual mimena~e of all ~~ areas o~s~e, ~ well as ~m~ous plam~ areas w~hin the ~ ~N~f-way. All la~ am~ s~ll N ke~ line from we~s a~ dens ~ mi~ in a hea~ ~ th~i~ ~bn, a~ s~l r~eive r~ular pruning, feffil~i~, ~i~, a~ ~mm~. ~ ~ged, ~, d~eas~, or d~ying plato mtedal shil N m~ ~in 30 ~ys from t~ le of dam~. 11. Front yaffi la~ing shall ~ r~ir~ ~r t~ ~ve~mm ~ a~ Ior / / . ~is rlimmm eMIl ~ in ~n to t~ rffiuir~ mmet trees a~ s~ Fami~. '12. ~e final ~s~n of tM ~dmter ~ays, wii, ~~~, a~ S~al~ shall ~ /. / i~bd~ in the rli~ I~ Nns ~ ell N ~ to C~ PinNr rev~ a~ ~val aM ~ffiim~ for ~e~ ~h aW H~ay ~~i~ Nn wh~h my N reimd by t~ E~i~d~ D~bn. 13. S~I ~~ fea~rH ~ B ~i~, ilw~ ~, mn she trees, mawr- / / i~ s~wa~ (wRh ~mi c~e), aN ime~ m~, · riir~ m~ / 14. La~i~ ~ iffi~n W~e~ ~irN to N i~i~ wbb t~ ~ ~M~f-way on / / tN edmter ~ thi pm~ area eMIl N ~mi~us~ ~i~ W tN ~ve~r. 15. All walls eMIl N pm~ w~h N~rati~ tramram. ff ~N in ~bl~ mimena~e amH, / / t~ ~s;n s~l N ~ffiinmH w~ tM E~i~d~ D~n. 16. Tre mimena~ c~eM eMIl M ~~ a~ ~ml~ for C~ Pin~r rev~ a~ / / ~val ~r ~ ~~ of ~i~ ~Rs. ~ cffieda eMIl e~ra~ ~e ~uml g~h mar~ed~ of the ~1~ ire ~is. 17. La~i~ anp i~mbn ~all N ~s~ to ~nHwe water th~h the pd~iples of / / Xedm as defi~ in C~er 19.16 of ~ Ra~ Cu~m~a Mun~ml ~. 2/9 ] 5 F. SIg~ ~ 1. ~esignsi~onthesubm~plansare~ualonlyand~tapa~of this~mval. / / Any s~ pm~d for this deve~p~nt shall ~ w~h the S~n Ordinate a~ shall r~uim ~rae ~li~ion a~ ~pmval by the Planni~ DMs~n p~r to installat~n of any s~ns. 2. 'A Un~o~ S~n Pr~mm for this deve~pmem shall ~ sum~ for C~ Planner review a~ / / ~roval pdor to issua~e of bui~i~ ~. 3. Dir~off mnumem s~n(s) s~ll ~ ~v~ for ~R~, ~ominium, or town~s / / p~r to ~~ a~ s~ll r~im separ~e a~l~n a~ ~mval by the Planni~ DMs~n pdor to ~sua~ of ~i~i~ ~s. G. Environmental 1. ~e deve~r shall pmv~e ea~ p~s~ive ~yer w~en ~t~ of the Foufih Street Ro~ / Crusher pm~ in a sta~affi fo~ ~ dete~n~ by ~e C~ Pinner, p~r to a~pti~ a ~sh ~s~ on any Plann~, p~r to a~e~i~ a ~ ~sa on a~ ~. 3. ~e ~velo~r shall ~vl e~ ~~e ~yer ~en ~t~ of t~ F~thill Fm~ay / / pmje~ in a ~a~ fo~t ~ dete~i~ ~ t~ C~ Pin~r, ~r to a~i~ a ~sh ~ on a~ ~. 4. A fill a~l m~ s~l ~ ~ed for C~ Pinner rev~ a~ ~mval pdor to the / / issua~e of ~i~i~ ~as. T~ final r~ s/I d~ss t~ Ivel of ime~r ~ise afienut~n to be~ 45 CNEL, t~ ~i~i~ ~ed~ ~ ~n~n t~n~ues ~v~, aM ~ ~d~e, ve~ t~ ad~ of t~ maim ~ms. ~ ~i~i~ ~ans will ~ c~ for ~ffio~ w~h t~ ~n ~ms ~ai~ in tM final re~. H. ~her Agencl~ / 1. E~~mMaff~s~l~~ina~~wahRam~Cu~m~aFire / / Pmt~n Di~ ~aMa~. 2. E~~a~eBsMIl~v~,~e~fr~clar, a mini~mof261eetw~e / / ~ all tires ~d~ ~~n in a~ffim dh R~ C~~ Fire Pmt~n / 3. P~r to ~a~ of ~i~i~ ~ f~ ~i~ ~t~n, e~e~e shall ~ / / su~ to t~ Ra~ Cu~~ Rm P~n D~ t~ te~mff wler ~ for fire pmt~ ~ ~ll, ~Mi~ ~t~n ~ rffiui~ lire ~tffi~n s~tem. 4. ~e ~m sMII ~ ~ U. S. Po~al ~ t ~e~ t~ ~le ~ aM / / ~t~n of mail ~xes. Muai-fami~ ms~emil ~vemms s~l ~vl a ~1~ ovemead strum for rail ~xes w~h ~e I~Mi~. ~e f~ ~n ~ ~ ~1 ~xes aM the ~s~n of t~ ove~ad ~m shall ~ su~ffi to C~ Pin~r mv~ ~ a~oval pr~r to t~ is~a~e of ~i~i~ ~as. '/ 5. For pmj~s usi~ se~ ta~ facilit~s. w~en ~fiff~t~n of a~a~l~. i~di~ all / su~nNe iffo~t~n, sMII N o~ai~ from tN San ~ffii~ ~y De~nmm of E~imn~mal Heath a~ ~~ to the ~i~i~ ~ial ~r to t~ i~a~ of ~ptic Tank Pe~s, a~ ff~r to issua~e of ~i~i~ pe~. ~ - 2/9] 6 APPLICANTS SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (714) 989-1863, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: I. Site Developmere 1. The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechani- / cal Code, Uniform Plumbing C,4xle, National Electric Code, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of issuance of relative permits. Please contact the Building and Safety Division for copies of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential dwelling unit(s) or major addifion / / to existing unit(s), the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rats. Such tees may include, but am not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Systems Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fees. 3. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commemial or industrial development or / / addition to an existing development, the applicant shall pay development tees at the established rate. Such tees may include, but are not limited to: Systems Development Fee, Drainage Fee, School Fees, Permit and Plan Checking Fees. ,/ 4. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building Official, altertract/parcel map recordation / / and prior to issuance of building permits. J. Existing Structures 1. Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code for the property line clearances / / considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness of existing buildings. 2. Existing buildings shall be made to comply with correct building and zoning regulations for / / the intended use or the building shall be demolished. 3. Existing sewage disposal facilities shall be removed, filled and/or capped to comply with the / / Uniform Plumbing Code and Uniform Building Code. 4. Underground on-site utilities are to be located and shown on building plans submitted for / /.__ K. Grading 1. Grading of the sul~ect property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City / /'- Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial contormance with the approved grading plan. v/' 2. A soils raport shall be prepared by a qualifkKI engineer licensed by the State of Calitomla to / / perform such work. 3. The development is located within the soil erosion control boundaries; a Soil Disturbance / / Permit is required. Please contact San Bemaffiino County Department of Agriculture at (714) 387-2111 for permit application. Documentation of such permit shall be submitted to the City prior to the issuance ol rough grading permit. 4.A geological report shell be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitlecl at the time of application for grading plan check. 5. The fina~ grading plans sha~~ be compieted and appr~ved pri~rt~ issuance ~f building permits. _..J / SCo 2/9 1 7 8.4 MITIGATION MEASURES LANDFORM AND TOPOGRAPHY 1. Project implementation shall comply with all Fading provisions contained within the City's adopted Hillside Development Regulations. These regulations provide standards for revegetation of slopes, limitations on earthwork during the rainy season, setbacks for slope maintenance, slope ratios, areas of cut and fill, allowed fill depths, use of retaining walls, and other standards. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Grading Permit 2. Project implementation shall comply with all relevant standards from the Uniform Building Code pertaining to earthwork, grading, erosion control, soft compaction and other standards. These standards shah also apply to the selection, storage and maintenance of equipment used in grading and associated internal and off-site haul mutes. Responsible Agency:. City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Grading Permit 3. As part of the submittal to the City for a Grading Permit, the applicant shall provide an approved erosion control and silt retention plan. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Grading Permit 4. In the event that cut and f~l volumes are not balanced on site, the applicant shah submit to the City a plan describing haul routes for off-site disposal of excess cut mateddais. This plan shall be approved by the City prior to issuance of a grading permit Responsible Agency:. City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Grading Permit 5. Any permits, approvals and environmental review required for construction of domestic water facilities shah be provided separately by Cucamonga County Water District. Responsible Agency:. Cucamonga County Water District Implementation Timing: Prior to Approval of Projects to Construct Additional Facilities 6. In the event that any firthwork is proposed to occur within the Cucamonga Canyon Wash flood control easement, the applicant shah obtain an Encroachment Permit from the San Bernardino County Transportation/Flood Control District. Responsible Agency: San Bernardino CountyTran-~portation/Eood Control District. Implementation Timing: If required, Encroachment Permit to be obtained from the County prior to City of Rancho Cucamonga issuance of Grading Permit. GEOLOGY AND SOILS 7. No human occupied structures shall be built within the seismic exclusion zone. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Building Permit 58 K The project design shah conform with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code requirements as well as the recommendations of the Structural Engineers Association for mitigation of seismic shaking. Responsible Agency:. City of Rancho Cucarnonga Implementation Timing: Building Permit 9. A numerical coefficient for site-structure resonance of 1.0 shall be utilized. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Building Permit 10. As required by the Hillside Development Regulations, a statement shall be provided on the deeds informing homebuyers that the site is in an Alquist Priolo Special Studies Zone and subject to potential seismic hazards. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Certificates of Use and Occupancy 11. Project implementation shah comply with all measures identified in the report prepared by RMA, including the requirement that final plans be reviewed by the geotechnical consultant to ensure that changes and revisions are made where necessary. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Grading Permit 12. All grading shall be performed in accordance with all applicable City of Rancho Cucamonga requirements. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Grading Permit 13. Building pad areas extending 5 feet beyond the exterior footings shall be undercut 1.0 feet below the bottom of the proposed footings. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Building Permit 14. Oversize earth materials shall not be placed within 10.feet of finish grade without approval of the geotechnical consultant. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Grading Permit 15. Setbacks from the top of the cliff shall utilize a 1.5 to 1 slope configuration, plus a 150- foot building setback from the top of the bank of Cucamonga Creel Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Grading Permit 16. Fill slopes of 2 to 1 slope shall not exceed 40.feet in height without geotechnical review and approval All fib over cut slopes shah be cut back one full equipment width into the firm underlying soil layers and constructed as compacted fill slopes. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Grading Permit 17. A slope maintenance program shall be developed and implemented to control erosion and debris flows. Such program shall include an on-going rodent control program to minimize the slope-weakening effects of rodent burrowing. Responsible Agency:. City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Grading Permit 18. Footings having a minimum width of 12-inches and placed a minimum of 12 inches below the lowest adjacent grade shall have a soil bearing value of 1800 pounds per square foot. This value may be increased by 20% for each additional foot of width or depth to a maximum value of 3000 pounds per square foot. (Reinforcement of footings for soil expansion is not required.) Responsible Agency:. City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Grading Permit 19. Soils engineering observation and testing shall be conducted upon completion of clearing and grubbing; during excavation and overexcavation in alluvial soil areas; during all phases of rough grading; and when any unusual conditions are encountered during grading. A final soils engineering report shall be submitted to the City upon completion of grading. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Monitoring During Project Grading, and Report submittal on Completion of Grading. HYDROLOGY 20. TT 14475 drainage improvements shall conform to all standards established by the City for intercepting and conducting onsite and offsite tributary flows around or through the site to the Almond Interceptor Channel, including adequate protection for adjacent and downstream properties. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Grading Permit · 21. Drainage improvements shall conform with all requirements established by the San Bernardino County Transportation/Hood Control Department. Responsible Agency: County of San Bernardino Implementation Tuning: During Review of Maps and Plans, and as part of Encroachment Permit (if required) 22.. The portion of the site within the Cucamonga Creek drainage shall be covered by an adequate City drainage easement. Respons~!e Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Grading Permit 23. A minimum 150 foot building setback shall be established from the top of the bank of Cucamonga Creek. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Grading Permit 24. A stringent program of slope and erosion control shall be undertaken by the developer to prevent damage to the site and downstream properties during heavy storm runoffs, especially during construction. Responsil:ile Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Grading Permit 2.5. A permit shall be obtained from the County in the event project implementation will require encroachment onto Flood Control Department right-of-way. Responsible Agency: County of San Bernardino Transportation/Flood Control Department (ff required) Implementation Timing: Prior to initiation of earthwork inside the County right-of-way CULTURAL RESOURCES 26. A qualified archaeologist shall monitor brush-clearing and earth-moving operations in the vicinity of SBr-3004, and shah determine the area to be so monitored. In the event that monitoring yields evidence of archaeological resources, the archaeologist shall evaluate the significance of the re,sources. ff deemed appropriate on the basis of this evaluation, the archaeologist shall develop a mitigation program. These measures shall be implemented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga (or its contractors), and funded by the project applicant. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Grading Permit 27. Regardless of the outcome of the mitigation measure above, the following additional steps have been developed by the Native American Heritage Society and shall be undertaken immediately upon discovery of human remains at the construction site: a) In the event of discovery of human remains, there shah be no further excavation or disturbance ff the site or any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent remains until the San Bernardino County Coroner has determined, in accordance with Chapter 10 of Part 3 of Division 2 of Title 3 of the Government Code, that the remains are not subject to the provisions of Section 27491 of the Government Code or any other related provisions of law and recommendations concerning the disposition of such remains have been made to the City of Rancho Cueamonga in the manner provided in Section 5097.98 of the Public Resources Code. The coroner shall make a determination within two working days from the date of notification. b) ff the coroner determines that the remains are not subject to his or her authority and also recognizes the human remains to be those of a Native American, the coroner shall contact the Native American Heritage Commission by telephone within 24 hours. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: During Grading and Construction AIR QUALITY 28. Concurrent with the application for a grading permit, the applicant shall propose suppression measures for fugitive dust in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building Code requirements. These measures shall be incorporated as conditions of the grading permit. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Grading Permit BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES 29. The applicant shah comply with all provisions regarding landscaping as provided in the City's adopted Hillside Development Regulations. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Recordation of Tentative Tract Map 30. The applicant shall avoid damaging or removing mature native coast live oaks from their locations on site. Efforts to avoid damage shall include (1) irrigation that prevents overwatering or underwatering of native oaks; (2) avoidance of soil compaction above the root zone; (3) preservation of adequate drainage; (4) prohibition on use of weed inhibitors (during road paving) in the vicinity of oak trees. If native oak trees are removed as a result of site preparation, they shah be replaced by boxed specimens in compatible areas to be selected by a qualified expert. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Building Permit 31. Revegetation shall be accomplished on all graded and cut and fill areas where structures or improvements are not constructed. Preference shall be given to the use of drought- adapted, fire-retardant plant materials, especially species native to the southern California foothills. Use of these materials shall be contingent on availability of seed stocks and approval of appropriate fire management agencies. If landscaping requires irrigation for growth, consideration shall be given to use of water injection systems. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Building Permit 32. Measures shall be taken to minimize entry of construction sediments into drainages. Hydroseeding shall be practices with use of rapid-developing, soil-anchoring groundcover and strategic placements of runoff-retaining structures. Responsible Agency:. City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Grading Permit 33. The Homeowners' Association for TT 14475 shah be responsible for ensuring that all on- and off-site open space areas are buffered in a manner to discourage encroachment by the new human population. Measures shall include but not be limited to (1) fencing-off of the sandy wash to discourage off-road vehicle and other use of this area, and (2) posting of interpretive signage at the wash edge to education residents about the sensitivity of this habitat for plants and animal species. Trail systems shah be designed to protect these areas from human use, the enforcement of which shah be the responsibility of the Homeowners' Association as well as the City, and shah not terminate at the boundaries of open space areas. The applicant shall incorporate, and the Homeowners' Association enforce, deed restrictions that regulate the management of household pets and the operation of motorized off-road vehicles. Responsible Agency:. City ofRancho Cucamonga; Homeowners' Association Implementation Timing: Recordation of Tentative Tract Map and On-going 34. Night lighting shah be screened from intrusion into open space areas by means of restricted placement, and/or low-intensity bulbs, and/or low elevation and hooded standards, and/or shielding by internal silvering of the glove or external opaque reflectors. Responsible Agency:. City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Certificates of Use and Occupancy 62 ON-SITE AND SURROUNDING LAND USES 35. The applicant shall submit to the City a recorded property line survey showing all boundaries along the northerly property boundaries as prepared by a licensed land surveyor. Comers shall be monumented in accordance with State law. Any lots having a common line with the National Forest shall have that line permanently and visibly posted and monumenteel. As indicated in correspondence from the Forest Service, the current site plan would require posting only along the north line of Lot B. This survey shall also determine the status of the three private parcels on the northern site boundary (parcels 200-051-08, 439, and -12). If appropriate based on survey findings and an analysis of the buildability of the lots, additional mitigation measures shall be developed to assure that these parcels do not become landlocked as a consequence of 'IF 14475 implementation. Responsible Agency:. City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Grading Permit 36. The City shah require that the applicant revise the internal trail system to eliminate discontinuous trail termini along the National Forest boundary, and shall consider an integrated loop trail along the project perimeter. The backbone trail along Cucamonga Canyon Wash shall be fenced on both sides, and pulled back approximately 15 to 25 feet from the top of the canyon wall The Homoowners' Association shall be responsible for posting all trails with signs stating that no riding is permitted off of project trails, off of Big Tree Road, or in the Cucamonga Canyon Wash. Responsible Agencies: City of Rancho Cucamonga; Homeowners' Assocation Implementation Timing: Grading Permit IrELEVANT PLANNING 37. The project proposal shall be considered by the Grading Review Committee, the Technical Review Committee, the Trails Advisory Committee, and the Design Review Committee for consistency with the City General Plan and Development Code (including the Hillside Development Regulations). Requirements developed through these reviews shall be incorporated as conditions of project approval and implemented by the applicant. Responsible Agency:. City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Grading Permit 38. During these review processes, it is recommended that the City give close attention to the following areas that have been found to be potentially in conflict with relevant plans: (1) layout of streets and residences that does not maximize am to solar energy; (2) circulation system omission of split roadways and shared driveways; (3) building heights and envelopes that may exceed Hillside Regulation standards; (4) trail locations and termini that may conflict with conservation goals as expressed by the Forest Service and project biologists; (5) design modifications to acxommodate public use of Big Tree Road, including parking, security and screening; (6) compliance with fill depth requirements and retaining wall heights; (7) pad placement on Lots #40, 48, 49, 53, .54, 62, 66 and 67, that may result in significant Fading requirements; and (8) pad placement on lots adjacent to Cucamonga Creek to ensure compliance with the 150-foot building setback from the top of Cucamonga Creek (the pad for Lot 11 appears to conflict with this provision). Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Grading Permit TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION 39. Any use of, modification of, encroachment onto, relocation or, or impacts upon the Forest Road 1N34 (Big Tree Road) will require advance coordination with the Forest Service. Respons~le Agencies: City of Rancho Cucamonga; U.S. Forest Service Implementation Timing: Grading Permit 40. The current sunset-m-sunrise closure of Forest Road 1N34 and Party Point will be maintained by both the City and the Forest Service to preclude resumption of illegal uses. The City shall coordinate with the Forest Service regarding potential impacts of the project on these agreements, and the City shall in turn coordinate with the applicant regarding any actions required on the part of Sahama Investments or future residents of TT 14475 m ensure that the closures are enforced. Responsible Agencies: City of Rancho Cucamonga; U.S. Forest Service Implementation Timing: Prior to Project Approval (communication); On-going (enforcement of closure) 41. The deeds to all lots within TI' 14475 shall clearly notify buyers of the status of Big Tree Road as a public passageway pursuant to Federal Law, and contain clear notification of potential extx~ure to noise, traffic and public visitation resulting from this legal access. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Certificates of Use and Occupancy 42. To partially mitigate the cumulative adverse impacts associated with increased development along the National Forest boundary, the City shall invite the Forest Service to prepare an environmental handout that addresses public use and adjacent residential issues in an informational and educational manner. The City shall require the developer to provide a copy of this handout to all new property owners within the TI' 14475 project. Respons~le Agencies: City of Rancho Cucamonga; U.S. Forest Service Implementation Timing:. Grading Permit (invitation) and During Home Sales Program (handout distribution) 43. The City and the U.S. Forest Service shall take the following measures to reduce conflicts between recreational and residential interests: (1) maintaining the connection to Big Tree Road at "D" Street to reduce the distance recreational vehicles must travel in the tract; and (2) Posting "No Recreational Vehicle Parking" signs within Tr 14475 where necessary. Additionally, the City and the U.S. Forest Service shall consider implementation of the following measure (or other means): (3) Erecting a protective barrier along segments of Big Tree Road that adjoin TT 14475 residential lots. Such barrier shall be placed and designed in conjunction with Forest Service consultation. Respons~le Agencies: City of Rancho Cucamonga; U.S. Forest Service Implementation Timing: Grading Permit (connection to Big Tree Rd. and protective barriers); Certificates of Use and Occupancy (signs) 44. Consistent with C, eneral Plan requirements for private roads, the City Engineer shall review and approve the final site plan. The plan shall provide security gates at all points of entry; maintenance and operation costs shall be solely at the expense of project homeowners. If the circulation system is proposed to be public, the project road system will be revised to conform fully with City standards for public roads. During Design Review, the City will determine whether the circulation system complies with relevant fire protection standards and will incorporate modifications if required based on this review. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Recordation of Final Map PUBLIC SERVICES AND UTILITIES Fire Protection 45. Dead-end streets that are to be extended at a future date shall be designed as temporary cuts-de-sac to provide for adequate turn-around diameters for emergency vehicles. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Recordation of Final Map 46. All standards of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District shall be implemented. Additionally, the applicant shall retain a wildland fire consultant during project design. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Grading Permit 47. All proposed develgpment shall satisfy the structural fire protection standards contained in the most recent adopted edition of the Uniform Building Code and Uniform Fire Code. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Building Permit 48. Fire protection water systems and fire hydrants necessary to serve the project within the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District's minimum response time shall be in place and operational prior to delivery of materials for building construction. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Building Permit 49. Recommendations contained in the 1991 Phase One Wildland Fire Safety_ Report for the project shall be implemented, and the Phase Two report shall be completed prior to final map recordation. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Recordation of Final Map Police Services 50. Clearly marked house numbers shall be incorporated into project design standards. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Building Permit 51. The San Bernardino County Sheriffs Department shall be consulted prior to project implementation to assess the need for additional department personnel and equipment, and to obtain information on crime prevention measures that can be incorporated into project design. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Building Permit 65 52. Domestic water storage and distribution facilities necessary to serve the project site shall be provided in accordance with CCWD requirements. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Issuance of Will Serve Letter 53. The project shall incorporate water conservation measures as required by state law, including but not limited to low-volume toilets, shower-heads and faucets, insulation of water lines in water recirculating systems, and plumbing materials and techniques (please refer to the attachment to the NOP response from the Department of Water Resources for a comprehensive list of required and recommended water conservation measures). Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Building Permit 54. On-site pump and pressure tank systems shah be provided for Lots 47 through 53 if required to ensure adequate water pressures. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga, Cucamonga County Water District Implementation Timing: Grading Permit 55. Access to Reservoir 7A shall meet with the approval of CCWD officials. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga, Cucamonga County Water District Implementation Timing: Grading Permit Wastewater 56. The proposed onsite sewage disposal system shah be reviewed and approved by the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board prior to project approval. This review will require that percolation tests be performed by the applicant to establish the suitability of on-site soils for septic leaching, and to determine if potential water quality impacts would result from use of an on-site septic tank system. Responsible Agency: Santa Aria Regional Water Quality Control Board and City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Grading Permit Schools 57. As required by state law, the applicant shall pay per unit fees for the funding of educational programs. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Grading Permit 58. Prior to recordation of the final map, a meeting shall be held between the City, school district officials and the applicant to determine whether additional assistance will be required to serve students generated by the 'l"r 14475 project. Such measures, if needed, could include supplemental funding agreements or participation in a community facilities district to generate additional revenues for education. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Implementation Timing: Recordation of Final Map Solid Waste No mitigation measures are required or proposed. 61 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 8, 1992 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Steven Ross, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 92-06 - COUTS O~L - A request to establish a 1,170 square foot office within an existing industrial park on 7.38' acres of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 8) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, located at 10700 Jersey Boulevard, Suite 700 - APN: 209~144-83- PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested by Applicant: Approval of a non-construction Conditional Use Permit to allow an office use within the General Industrial District- B. Applicable Regulations: The Industrial Area Specific Plan allows administrative office uses in Subarea 8 subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. C- Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Office, light wholesale, storage, and distribution; General Industrial (Subarea 8), Industrial Area Specific Plan South - Medium manufacturing; Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial (Subarea 9), Industrial Area Specific Plan East - Light wholesale, storage, and distribution; Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial ( Subarea 9 ), Industrial Area Specific Plan West - Light wholesale, storage, and distribution; General Industrial (Subarea 8), Industrial Area Specific Plan D. General Plan Designations: Project Site - General Industrial North - General Industrial South - Heavy Industrial East - Heavy Industrial West - General Industrial E. Site Characteristics: The site is a fully developed multi-tenant business park- ITSM H PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 92-06 - COUTS OIL April 8, 1992 Page 2 F- Parking Calculations: Number of Number of Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces of Use Footage Ratio Required Provided Multi-Tenant 107,568 1/400 269 (includes 35% office ) Other Offices 8,220 1/250 33 Couts Oil I, 170 1/250 __5 .... Total 307 366 ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicant, Couts Oil Inc., is currently operating at the site without a Conditional Use Permit, as is required by the Industrial Area Specific Plan- The applicant was recently notified of the requirement for a Conditional Use Permit and subsequently submitted the application. The applicant is proposing to use a 1,170 square foot office suite within a 20,000 square foot multi-tenant building as the administrative office for buying and selling gasoline, diesel, jet, and avgas fuels. The product is not stored on the premises- B. Land Use Compatabilit~: The basic premise of all zoning is the separation of incompatiDle uses- Subarea 8 is zoned for General Industrial activities and is intended primarily for industrial type users. Typical uses permitted would include custom and light manufacturing and building contractor's offices and yards, as well as business support services, communication services, and research services- Secondary uses, such as administrative and office uses, may be permitted subject to review and approval of a Conditional Use Permit. The 7-acre business park is made up of more than 50 small businesses, occupying from 864 to over 3,0 00 square feet · The business park was designed for a variety of uses, including office space in the suites fronting Jersey Boulevard that the applicant desires to operate within- Staff does not anticipate any land use conf li cts · For your information, staff has been notified that a number of other tenants requiring Conditional Use Permits do not have them, and the Code Enforcement and Business License Divisions have been working with Planning staff to encourage these businesses to submit the required applications as soon as possible- PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 92-06 - COUTS OIL April 8, 1992 Page 3 C. Parking: The Jersey Business Park is composed of seven multi- tenant buildings totaling 107,568 square feet. Although the parking ratio for this type of use is 1 space per 400 square feet and allows up to 35 percent office area, the project was "overparked" to accommodate extra office space- The site has 97 parking spaces more than required for existing uses; therefore, an additional 24,250 square feet could be utilized for office uses amounting to a total of 61,500 square feet of office area. A total of 59 extra parking spaces would still be available if the Commission approves this use- FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The Commission must make all the following findings in order to approve this application: A. The proposed use is in accordance with the General Plan, the objectives of -.the Development Code, and the purposes of the Industrial Area Specific Plan Subarea in which the site is located. B. The proposed use will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. C. The proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Industrial Area Specific Plan. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property has been posted, and notices have been sent to adjacent property owners within 300 feet of the project. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Conditional Use Permit 92-06 through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval- BB: SR: mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Letter from Applicant Exhibit' "B" - Vicinity Map Exhibit "C" - Site Plan Exhibit "D" - Floor Plan Resolution of Approval January 31, 1992 To: The City of Rancho Cucamonga From: Couts Oil Inc. We will be using ~he location of 10700 Jersey Blvd. Suite # 700 strictly as a business office. The function of our business is to by and sell gasoline, diesel, jet, and avgas fuels. At the high side, employment at this location should not exceed 4 people. Our standard operating hours will be 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM. As to why we are filing for this conditional use permit, it is beyond our comprehension- Sincerely, en Pacci one Executive Vice President Post Office Box 2955 · Rancho Cucamonga, California 91729 · (714) 355-4488 · FAX (714) 355-3523 TY OF RAN~O-...'CUCAMONGA FFEM: 001' ~12-06 C~vt PLANNING DIVISION TTT'LE: VK-,~ rv ~TY rJ~r EXHIBIT: }~ SCALE: OFFICE SUITES ILDG. 200 ILK. 600 iI (~1 .......... "' ~LDG. 300 ILDG. 500 ILDG. 1OO ILDG. I 2880 5Q. R ~_ ~ ~ ~ --~ ....... ~-- __ ~sa J~ --~ ..... ..... ' I~0 $Q. ~ ILN. 400 ~1' t440 $Q. FL __ 11~ ~! / JERSEY ILVD. NOT mo s~m / , FLOOR PLAN JERSEY BUSINESS PARK Suites 100, 105, 700, and 705 1, 170 square feet I1' ° II II h' II II OF RANCHO,.'CUCAMONCA iTEM: CuP ~=-t>~ PLANNING' DBrISION TI'R.E: ~\~ Pl~ EXHIBIT: E) SCALE: RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE pLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 92-06 FOR AN ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE, LOCATED AT 10700 JERSEY BOULEVARD, SUITE 700, WITHIN AN EXISTING BUSINESS PARK IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT (SUBAREA 8) OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 209-144-83- A- Recitals. (i) Couts Oil, Inc. has filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use permit No- 92-06 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application." (ii) On the 8th day of April 1992, the planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date- (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred- B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on April 8, 1992, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at 10700 Jersey Boulevard, Suite 700, which is part of an existing business park developed with 366 parking spaces (97 more than Code requires for multi-tenant industrial); and (b) The property to the north of the subject site is a light industrial building, the property to the south of that site consists of an office and storage yard, the property to the east is a warehouse building, and the property to the west is a warehouse building; and (c) The application contemplates the use of the space as an office for buying and selling fuels- No storage of fuels is proposed- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO- CUP 92-06 - COUTS OIL, INC. April 8, 1992 Page 2 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. (b) That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity- (c) That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code and the Industrial Area Specific Plan- 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to the following conditions: Planning Division 1) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Industrial Area Specific Plan and all other City ordinances- 2) If operation of the facility causes adverse effects upon adjacent businesses or operations, the Conditional Use permit shall be brought before the Planning Commission for consideration and possible termination of the use- 3) This approval is for administrative office use only. Storage or distribution of fuel products is prohibited- 5- The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution- APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF APRIL 1992- PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T- McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO- CUP 92-06 - COUTS OIL, INC. April 8, 1992 Page 3 I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of April 1992, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: -- ) -- Files BPK-44-21 April 7, 1992 CIT'((~F"' PL~.~-'.':"i.'~ E"'.,~S~ON City of Ra~oho Cucamonga Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 SUBJECT: PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT-APPROVAL OF TREE REMOVAL PERMIT 91-47 - LOS ANGELES COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Dear Mr. BulleT: The Los Angeles Coun=y Transports=ion Commission (LACTC) is In the appeal of those certain provisions in support of the request to plant replacement trees off the right- of-way is appreciated. Since the future plans for the Metrolink Commuter Rail service on the Baldwin Park Branch Line wili most likely include the placement of a second main track,. the replanting of the trees in the same area would present a safety problem. The Los Angeles County Transportation Commission as well as the Southern California Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA) strongly supports your staff recommendation to the Planning Commission on the above referenced repor~ ~0 uphold ~he appeal of the LACTC by minute action, modifying condition No. 2, ~o allow off site tree replacement as specified. Thank you for the courtesy you have extended to the LACTC in this appeal, and should you have any questions or need additional information, please contact the undersigned at (213) 244-6190. Sincerely, Real lstate Consultant JjMzmm cog J. Wiley D. Robb S. Vollucot J. ainard /___'7'[--~7 chro~. " RMC LIIA..qFltlICaIIItlF 81, BWel. tSe,e~Street Tmslemll subl~oo lessmiss TII213623,,11~4 II:I~VH AIIO ,-lcj9 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 8, 1992 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Tom Grahn, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: APPEAL OF TREE REMOVAL PERMIT 91-47 - LOS ANGELES COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION - An appeal of conditions of approval requiring replacement planting of 7 eucalyptus trees within the railroad right-of-way, located west of Hellman Avenue directly north of 7518 Pepper Street - APN: 208-011-05. BACKGROUND: On December 18, 1991, Tree Removal Permit 91-47 was submitted on behalf of the Los Angeles County Transportation Commission ( LACTC ). The request proposed removal of ten Eucalyptus trees located along the south property line of the railroad right-of-way (see Exhibit "F"). Seven trees are located direct ly behind 7518 Pepper Street and three trees are located directly behind 7528 Pepper Street. The applicant's reason for the tree removal is that the trees have damaged the rear fence at 7518 Pepper Street- Tree Removal Permit 91-47 was approved on January 22, 1992 ( see Exhibit "B")- The approval letter did not allow removal of the three trees located behind 7528 Pepper Street because the adjacent property owner objected to their removal, and consequently, the applicant agreed to their preservation- The seven trees behind 7518 Pepper Street have already been removed pursuant to the approved permit- ANALYSIS: The applicant is appealing Condition No. 2 of the Tree Removal Permit approval letter which requires replacement planting with seven Eucalyptus maculata (Spotted Gum) in a 5-gallon size minimum. The trees were required to be properly staked and irrigated for a sufficient time period to allow for establishment of the trees · The condition states that the "replacement trees shall be planted in a location where they will not conflict with the adjacent fence nor with 'the adjacent railroad line-" The City's tree replacement policy is mandated by Section 19.08,100 of the Tree Preservation Ordinance (see Exhibit "D"). Removal of Eucalyptus windrows require replacement planting with Eucalyptus maculata (Spotted Gum) along established grid patterns, the minimum replacement tree size is 15-gallon- Although the Ordinance does establish that a minimum 15-gallon size replacement tree shall be provided, the approval letter specifies a minimum 5-gallon tree size- In ideal planting conditions where irrigation is provided on a regular basis and tree growth can be monitored, a larger tree size would be more desirable- Because there are too many variables to consider in replacement planting (i.e., time of year, frequency of watering, type of soil, etc. ) staff conditioned replacement with a smaller tree in the prospect of a greater probability the trees will survive- ITt~4 I ,, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TRP 91-47 - LOS ANGELES COUNTY April 8, 1992 Page 2 In conjunction with their appeal, the applicant is now offering to replace the trees off-site- The applicant has offered to plant the replacement trees at another suitable location, such as a park or school or other public area (see Exhibit "C" )- The applicant contends that a future second track in this area would necessitate the removal of any trees planted within their right-of-way at this time. The LACTC has tentative plans to use this right-of-way for the Metrolink Commuter Line- Staff believes that the Tree Preservation Ordinance provides flexibility on the location of replacement planting. Therefore, the Planning Commission could modify the condition of approval to allow for replacement planting off-site. Staff supports this alternative. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property has been posted, and notices have been sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the project site- A letter from the resident of 7518 Pepper Street (see Exhibit "H") was received which opposes r. eplacement behind their property. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission uphold the appeal by minute action, modifying Condition No. 2 to allow off-site replacement planting as follows: 2. The seven Eucalyptus trees located behind 7518 Pepper Street may be removed- As required by the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, Section 19.08 · 100 (B), replacement planting is required. Tree replacement shall consist of seven trees, in a size and species as determined by the City Planner. The trees may be planted off-site subject to review and approval by the City Planner- BB:TG:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Tree Removal Permit Application Exhibit "B" - Letter of Approval for Tree Removal Permit 91-47 Exhibit "C" - Letter of Appeal Exhibit "D" - Tree Preservation Ordinance Replacement Criteria, Section 19.08. 100 Exhibit "E" - Location Map Exhibit "F" - Site Utilization Map Exhibit "G" - Photographs Exhibit "H" - Letter from 7518 Pepper Street City of Tree Removal Permit _ Rancho Cucamonga DEVEL z O GENERAL IN FORMATION OR MORE THAN 5 TREES OR 50' LINEAR FEET OF WINDRO Or) Ordinance No. 276, pertaining to the preservation of trees on private property, requires that no person )' remove or relocate any woody plants in excess of fifteen (15) feet in height and having a single trunk ~ circumference of fifteen (15) inches or more and multi-trunks having a circumference of thirty (30) inches or more (measured twenty-four (24) inches from ground level), without first obtaining a Tree ~ Removal Permit from the City. Z - TO BE COMPLETED BY,APPLICANT: ,_1 LOCATION OF SUBJECT SITE: Railroad right of way behind 7518 Pepper St. Rancho 'Cucamon~, NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF APPLICANT: Logan ' s Tractor Svc. - Dave Logan P.O. Box 534, La Habra, Calif. 90633 310-697-6628 III NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PROPERTY OWN ' i : · ~; Transportati on Corrini ssi on - Duncan Robb, 244;-6425 C)= 818 West Seventh St. Los Angeles, Calif. 90017 C) REASONS FOR REMOVAL (attach necessary sheets): See attached sheet J PROPOSED METHOD OF REMOVAL: Chain Saw, Stump Grinder Z APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE: .DATE:/2 AL FILING REQU~ ADDITION ;:, ~ ,~, ::r'~--:-::~"' 0 (.~ This application shall include a plot plan indicating location of all trees to be removed and retained. The species, number, and size of the trees to be removed shall be so designated. If a tree is diseased, LL then a w atement from a licensed arborist stating the nature of the disease shall be required. z III ~ DENIED -' ~: Reasons: rr' Date: Notification ,plication shall be given to property owners within a three hundred foot radius ten days ~ prior to approval. If no appeals are received, then the permit shall become effective ten (10) days from th~ ~ date of action. This approved tree removal permit is valid for 90 days from the date of final map recordatior r-1 or building permit issuance, whichever comes first- Should applicant fail to remove the trees within this g(: day period, a new permit shall be required, unless an extension is requested fourten (14) days prior to th~ expiration of the permit: TO BE COMPLETED BY STAFF: k 2 Proximity to an existing structure or interference with utility seaices. ~/· 5 E~t. ree removal on the 'aesthetics of the area and the public health, welfare and safety. 7 Do the trees onst ute a significant natural resource? · trees required be p. eserved by any specific plan, condition of approval or historic land- 8 Are the ~ mark designation? ' 9. Is an arborist required? ~ ' Reason: The trees have destroyed the fence behind 7518 Pepper St. and the house next door to the west. The resident at 7518, Janice Hernandez, has contacted city officials and the prior owner of the right of way, Southern Pacific Company, requesting removal of the trees and repair of her damaged fence. It is our understanding that Southern Pacific has agreed to replace the fence after the trees are removed. The trees are located on the property line only inches from the fence. It is feared that cutting and removing the tree roots under the fence will make the trees vulnerable to falling in the high winds. This could cause greater property damage, possible injuries and additional liability. / ',41 ! T H E C I T Y 0 F ANC O CUC MONQ January 22, 1992 Duncan Robb Los Angeles County Transportation Commission 818 West Seventh Street Los Angeles, CA- 90017 SUBJECT: TREE REMOVAL pERMIT 91-47 Dear Mr. Robb: The planning Division has reviewed your request for the removal of ten Eucalyptus trees within the railroad right-of-way, located directly behind 7518 and 7528 Pepper Street. Based upon staff review and inspection, the following findings have been made: 1. The subject trees are defined as "Heritage Trees" in the Tree preservation Ordinance (Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, Section 19.08,030). 2.The trees appear to have damaged the wood fence located along the rear property line of 7518 Pepper Street- 3. Adjacent property owners were notified and given a 10 day period in which to'comment on the request. The owner of 7518 pepper Street submitted a letter requesting removal of the seven trees directly behind their property- The owner of 7528 pepper Street submitted a letter requesting preservation of the three trees directly behind their property. Therefore, your permit has been approved subject to the following conditions: 1.The three eucalyptus trees located behind 7528 Pepper Street shall be preserved- 2. The seven eucalyptus trees located behind 7518 Pepper Street may be removed- As required by the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, Section 19.08.100(B), replacement planting is required- Tree replacement shall consist of seven Eucalyptus macaulata (Spotted Gum) in a 5-gallon size minimum- The trees shall be properly staked and irrigated for a sufficient time period to allow for establishment of the trees. Replacement trees shall be planted in a location where they will not conflict with the adjacent fence nor with the adjacent railroad line. The trees shall be planted per the attached Standard No- 605b- ~ Mayor Dennis L. Stout , CouncilmemOef Diane Willjams Jack Lain. AICP. Ci~ Manag~ i~! CouncilmemOer Chades J. Buau.~H · ~570 C,vic Ce~,er Dr,ve * ~O Box ~7 · Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 · (7~4) Q8Q-1851 · PAx TRP 91-47 January 22, 1992 Page 2 3. Prior to commencement of tree removal, those trees to be removed shall be marked by the applicant and verified by the Planning Division- 4- Replacement trees shall be planted within 30 days from the date of tree removal. Please contact the Planning Division for inspection following replacement planting. 5- This approval shall be valid for 90 days from the date of this letter. Extensions may be granted upon request, submitted in writing together with the $136-00 Minor Time Extension fee- This decision is final unless appealed within ten days from the date of this letter- Such appeals must be filed with the Secretary of the Planning Commission, in writing, together with the $62.00 appeal fee. If you should have any questions, please contact Tom Grahn at (714) 989-1861. Sinc OP DEPARTMENT Dan Coleman Principal Planner DC:JS Attachment: Standard Drawing No. 605b cc: Janis Hernandez, 7518 Pepper Street Don Phillippl, 7528 Pepper Street "iTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONr:,'. PLANNING DIVtglr)N '/.%gml)mIlm12mlllZil m ,e March 10, 1992 Mr. Tom Grahn File: BPK-44-21 City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729-0807 Re: Tree Removal Permit 91-47 Dear Mr. Grahn: As you requested, this letter confirms o.ur conversation today regarding the appeal of permit 91-47. We are appealing the stipulation that replacement trees be planted back on the right of way. In your January 22, 1992 letter you stated, "Replacement trees shall be planted in a location where they will not conflict with the adjacent fence nor with the adjacent railroad line." We interpreted this to mean off the right of way. But in our subsequent conversations you informed me that the trees would indeed have to be replanted along some portion of the right of way. Since we have tentative plans to run a second track in this area, replanting along the right of way would be pointless. The trees would have to come out again when the track was laid to avoid safety problems. As a reasonable compromise, we propose planting the replacement trees at another location of your choice - perhaps a park or a school or other public area which will not conflict with the future use of our property. Li)sAngelesCountY 818WestSeventttStreet / LeadinG the Way to Greater MoD,I~Fy OTransportation Suite 1100 ~,j,,,_:~ (~ Commission Los Angeles, CA 90017 LACTC Tel 213 623-1194 Mr. Tom Grahn March 10, 1992 Page Two If this is acceptable, please let me know so we can avoid the cost of sending a representative to the council meeting unnecessarily. If it is not or if you have an alternative suggestion, please contact me as soon as possible so we can make the necessary arrangements. I can be reached at (213) 244-6502. Thank you for your assistance. Sincerely, /~~. Ste Vollucci Real Estate Officer cc: RMC Chron D. Robb J. Meichtry J. Rinard D. Coleman - City of Rancho Cucamonga S. Rosales - SGVArea Team 19.08.080--19.08.100 party with the planning commission. Except as o~herwise provided in this title, such appeal is to be filed with secretary of the planning commission in writing, with any appeal fee, within ten calendar days of the sire action. The planning commission may consider ter and may affirm or reverse wholly or partly, on which is in question. 2. Planning Commission Decision. a plan- ning commission decision may be made by filing ,itten notice of appeal with the city clerk, togethe :h any ap- peal fee, within ten calendar days fc planning commission's decision. The city council consider the matter and may affirm or reverse wholly .rtly,.the action which is in question. E. Approval Period. Tree remova rmits shall be effective following the ten-day appe ~riod and shall be valid for a period of ninety days, ect to extension. Where the tree removal permit is .ated with a proposal for development, the ninety dayl ~1 start from the date of final map recordation or bu ng permit, whichever comes first. (Ord. 276 S2(part), - 19.08.080 Emerc sr. ~here a tree ~ de- the gnee to be in a danger- ous condition action to preserve the public health, safety welfare., the permit requirement may be waived. In :nt of an emergency caused by a hazardous or tree, which condition poses an imme- diate ~hreat to or property, any member of the Foot- hill fire protec' district may authorize the destruction or removal of tree without securing a permit therefor. (Ord. 276 S2( , 1986). 19.08. Use of ~sives. All persons engaged in felling trees, :ous of using explosives for this within the city limits, shall first obtain a o use such explosives from the building division and ill fire protection district which approval noted on the tree removal permit prior to issuance of by the city planner or planning commission. In ad- di , the applicant shall furnish such bond or insurance be deemed necessary for 'the protection of surround- property from any possible damage which might result mn such activity. (Ord. 276 §2(part), 1986). 19.08.100 Tree replacement policy. A. Where existing eucalyptus windrows are to be removed, they shall be re- placed with Eucalyptus maculata (spotted gum) along the es- tablished grid pattern in fifteen-gallon size minimum spaced at eight feet on center and properly staked, unless other- wise specified by a specific plan or community plan. B. All other heritage tree removal shall require 282-3 ( Rancho Cucamonga 19.08.110 replacement with the largest nursery-grown tree(s) available as determined by the city planner or planning commission. Heritage tree relocation to another location on the site is the preferred alternative to replacement subject to a writ- ten report by a landscape architect or arborist on the fea- sibility of transplanting the tree. C. The city planner or planning commission shall con- dition tree removal permit for replacement of tree(s) within a specific time period and in accordance with the replace- ment policy established herein. D. To assist the city planner or planning commission in making a determination, the applicant for a tree removal permit may be required to submit an independent appraisal prepared by an horticulturist, arborist, or licensed land- scape architect to determine the replacement value of the tree(s) to be removed. Such appraisal shall be based upon the most recent edition of the "Guide for Establishing Val- ues of Trees and Other Plants,' prepared by the Council of Tree Landscape Appraisers. (Ord. 276 S2(part), 1986). 19.08,110 Protection of existinq trees. Care exercised by all individuals, developers and con~ working near preserved trees so that no damage occur~ such trees. All construction shall preserve and the health of trees to remain, relocated trees, and rees planted to replace those removed .in accordance the fol- lowing measures: A. All trees to be saved shall be e by an ap- propriate construction barrier, such as link fence or other means acceptable to the city p] prior to the issuance of any grading or bulldine and prior to com- mencement of work. Fences are in place during all phases of construction and may De removed without the written consent of the city ~r until construction is complete~ and B. No substantial tion or removal of the struc- tural or absorptive any tree shall be performed~ and C. No fill ma' 1 shall be placed within three feet from the outer ircumference of any tree~ and D. No fill ~rials shall be placed within the drip line of any tr excess of eighteen inches in depth. This is a.gu. ne and is subject to modification to meet the needs ~ividual tree species as determined by an arborist architect, and E. substantial compaction of the soil within the drip >f any tree shall be undertaken~ and No construction, including structures and walls, th srupts the root system shall be-permitted. As a ~line, no cutting of roots should occur within a dis- ~ce equal to three and one-half times the trunk diameter, 3/ PM7853 2238 E~. 17 ~/33- ![ Planning Division City of Re~c~o Cuc~monga !.!.t',R 9 ~ · ,, ,:-. !992 P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucarnong~, CA 91729 i ~ ~ - Dear Ranning DMsion Representative, I am responding to the notice of public hearing that was sentto my address concerning the appeal of tree removal permit 91-47 Los Angeles County Transportation Commission. I am the resident at 75'18 Pepper Street in Rancho Cucamonga, and would like to make a statement regarding the planting of new trees to replace the ones taken down lest week The trees were requested by me to be removed because they were overgrown and distroyed my'fence during a storm in January 1991 . Forthe years that I have been a resident here, the trees have been nothing but a heaclac~e for me. About every 2 weeks I have to rake my backyard because of the litter of branches and leaves thatthe trees have dropped. I now hm/e a newfence and have no trees behind my property line and would prefer to keep it that way. There must be plenty of other places to put some nice eucalyptus trees other than right back where they came from. The mmntenance ofthe new trees would require an extra effortfor irrigation and trimming when they could be placed at a p~i< or school or a shopping center which more people could enjoythem than down railroad tracks that are eventually going to be used quite frequenlJy in the near future. I do enjoy trees when they are arranged in an appropriate location, butforthem to be right nextto my property again, would be taking one headache and replacing itwith another. Eventuallythese trees will too be large and I will have the same problem over again. Do lwant this?, nol I askyou to please consider a relocation of these newtrees to some place the communitywould benefitfrom them and theywouldn't be a maintenance problem for a young tree to grow. Thank you for your understanding. Sincerely, Rancho Cucarnonga. CA 9173D 71 4-987--511 ~1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 8, 1992 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Anna-Lisa Hernandez, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 92-07 - HIDE A WHILE - A request to expand an existing lounge by approximately 500 square feet within the existing Perry's Shopping Center in the Community Commercial District of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, located at 9469 Foothill Boulevard - APN: 208-261-40. (TO BE CONTINUED TO APRIL 22, 1992-) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission continue this item to the meeting of April 22, 1992. The applicant has requested the continuance in order to address the issue of parking- pectanlnRespect lly su f tted, BB:ALH/jfs Attachment: Exhibit "A" - Letter from Applicant IT~ J 03/18/90 19:18 1 PTS PAGE 82 lnlernalional Missions Fellowship P.O. Box6321 · San Bernardino, CA92412 · (714) 873-1725 April 6, 1992 City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California To Whom It May Concern: We have reviewed the reports of CSO Sandra Fatland and Deputy Tim Parnell of the Sheriff's Dept. and we would like to respond with the following comments taken in the same order as their comments as fol lows: p..a~kinq: The issue of the moving vans owned by Orbit Moving will be a dead issue as the property owner has told us this tenant is moving from the complex. Even with their presence there is still ample parking in the complex. Handicapped Parking: There will be full compliance with the regulations regarding marking of 2 handicapped spaces with white on blue background and required sign posting. Buildinq Access: There are two front doors which are 36" wide which we believe to be wide enough for wheel chair entry. A wheelchair ramp will be installed at one of these doors which will be marked for wheelchair entry. If this is not acceptable a larger door will be installed per code. Windows: The 4 front windows are approximately 12" wide and 4' high and double thickness. It would take a very skinny person to be able to comfortably enter a smashed window although it might be possible. Alarm: We are considering the possibility of installing an alarm system in the building. · elwe agree with the comments' on lighting and will install lighting to meet safety requirements around our building perimeter to light up the parking area. Roof Access: A larger mesh cover will be installed to prevent access to the rear roof. ~3/18/98 !9:lB 1 OTS PAGE Safety Concerns: The entire handrail on the east single door will be replaced. Dark parkin~ lot: As mentioned before additional lighting will be installed around proposed building to light up parking area. Dark street: This is not an issue which we are able to deal with. We believe 6th street is lighted as well as any other city side street and there will be no street parking. 9746 Sixth street: In our visits to the property on evenings and Sundays there has been no one working at this unit. 9716 Sixth. street: No comment 9722-9728 Sixth street: The owner of this business has told us that he is happy to see a church in this complex and would park his cars on Sundays at the rear of his building. 9740 Sixth street: This business is moving out. Crime report of area: We consider this to be what would probably be found in most any area of the city and much less then the activity found around our Ontario facility and we have never had even one problem at that location. I trust the above information has been helpful in your consideration of the proposed CUP. Our board of directors have all been in agreement that Rancho Cucamonga was the best area to relocate our church because of it's attractive development. v. James Planck ident IMF CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 8, 1992 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Anna-Lisa Hernandez, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 92-02 - INTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP OF CHURCHES - A request to establish a church within an existing industrial building in the General Industrial District (Subarea 4) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, located at 9746 Sixth Street - APN: 209- 211-33. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested bX Applicant: Approval of a non-construction Conditional Use Permit to allow a church to locate within the existing Archibald Business Center and conduct weekend services and evening meetings- B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Existing Light Industrial Complex; General Industrial, Subarea 4, Industrial Area Specific Plan South - Existing Light Industrial; General Industrial, Subarea 4, Industrial Area Specific Plan East - Existing Light Industrial; General Industrial, Subarea 5, Industrial Area Specific Plan West - Existing Single Family Residential, (2-4 dwelling units per acre) C- General Plan Designations: Project Site - General Industrial North - General Industrial South - General Industrial East - General Industrial West - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) D. Site Characteristics: The site is developed with six light industrial buildings- ITEM K PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 92-02 - INT'L FELLOWSHIP OF CHURCHES April 8, 1992 Page 2 E- Parking Calculations: Number of Type Square Parking Spaces of Use Foota~e Ratio Required Office 2,200 1/250 9 Retail 5,400 1/250 22 Light Wholesale, 20,090 1/1000 20 Storage/Distribution 18,560 1/2000 10 Service/Repair 3,860 1/400 10 Restau rant 1,500 1 / 100 15 Vacant 2,760 1/400 7 Karate School 1,200 1/150 8 Contractor ' s Off~ice 6 and Yard TOTAL REQUIRED 107 ..proposed Use: International Fellowship of Churches: Sanctuary 2,168 1/35 62* Total Required 169 Total Provided 169 * The balance of the square footage for the Church will be used for child care and classrooms in conjunction with the primary use of worship services- Six parking spaces would be required for any weekday office use- ANALY SIS: A. General: The International Missions Fellowship is proposing to occupy 8,000 square feet within the Archibald Business Center for its headquarters ministry offices, church assembly and evening classes. The applicant proposes the following hours of operation: 11:00 a.m. - 2:00 p.m. - Sunday Services 7:30 p.m. - 9:30 p.m. - Wednesday Services Small Youth Groups/Meetings - Saturdays In addition to the hours listed above, the applicant also proposes to maintain office hours during the week, during which the number of employees is not expected to exceed three. B. Discussion and Analysis: The primary issues related to this use locating within the Archibald Business Center are parking and compatibility with surrounding land uses. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 92-02 - INT'L FELLOWSHIP OF CHURCHES April 8, 1992 Page 3 1. Parking: A total of 169 parking stalls are required for all existing and future users within the site. There are a total of 169 parking stalls available. Further, the proposed use will not conflict with other users in the center because the proposed tenant intends to maintain their primary hours of operation during off-peak hours for the site- A majority of the users on-site maintain typical hours of operation, from 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. This would not conflict with the hours of operation proposed by the International Fellowship of Churches, ( evenings and on weekends ) · In addition, there are approximately 68 parking stalls within 100 feet of the building which should be adequate for the proposed church use. Therefore, staff does not anticipate any significant parking problems with this proposal. 2. Compatibilit~ with Surrounding Land Uses: There are a variety of uses within the industrial complex including light wholesale, storage and distribution, office retail, and repair services- The majority of these businesses operate at regular hours from 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Monday through Friday. The proposed hours of operation for church activities will take place during off-peak hours in the evenings and on weekends. The City has many churches operating in industrial complexes with no reports of any problems. Therefore, compatibility problems associated with this proposal are not expected. C. Police and Fire District Comments: The Fire District and the Police Department have reviewed the proposed project. Prior to occupancy, the Fire District shall require tenant improvement plans to be submitted to the Building and Safety Division. The Police Department has submitted a list of comments regarding safety issues such as handicap access, lighting and building access (See Exhibit "E" ). The applicant is currently working with the Police Department to address these issues. In addition, conditions have been added to ensure adequate safety for the tenants. ENVIRONMENTAL Assessment: Upon review of Part 1 of the Initial Study and completion of Part 2 of the Environmental Checklist, staff has found no significant impacts related to a church facility within an Office/Bus iness Park. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The Commission must make all of the following findings in order to approve this application: A- That the proposed use is in accordance with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the Terra Vista Community in which the site is located. B. That the proposed use will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 92-02 - INT'L FELLOWSHIP OF CHURCHES April 8, 1992 Page 4 C. That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Terra Vista Community Plan and the Development Code. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property has been posted, and notices have been sent to adjacent property owners within 300 feet of the project site. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Conditional Use Permit 92-02 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval and issuance of a Negative Declaration. Res ly ' ~d, anner BB:AH: js Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site Plan Exhibit "B" - Floor Plan Exhibit "C" - Letter from Applicant Exhibit "D" - Fire District Comments Exhibit "E" - Police Department Comments Resolution of Approval Storage Platform 39' 2" Seating for approximately 150 MAIN SANCTUARY 42 ' 6" CHILDRENS ~ ~ [ cHuRc~ ARsA _V_. [ ~1~ Utility ' 10' x26' # Nursery [3'~20' ~1,~'1~ Lobby International Missions Fellowship P.O-Box6321 · San Bernardino, CA92412- (714)873-1725 Jan. 14, 1992 City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Dr. Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91730 To Whom It May Concern: The proposed use of the building at 9746 Sixth Street is for a church assembly and heaquarters ministry offices for International Missions Fellowship. At the present time we have two church groups here in this area, one meeting in Rialto and the other using a a building by the same o%I;ners as 9746 6th in Ontario. Our plan is to combine our two groups together at this facility and move our world ministry offices to this location. The floor plan of our proposed use is attached. There are 21 parking spaces around the proposed site building and 171 parking spaces in the park itself owned by the same owner, Archibald Business Center. Since we are meeting at off business hours most of these spaces are empty and are avaliable for use. The building is a mordern building with sprinkler systems, a 400A electrical system and four (4) bathrooms which will be more than adequate. Our present congregation runs about 120-1 50 people. ~ The normal service times for church services would be I 1:00A to 2:00P on Sunday and 7:30P to 9:30P on Wed. Other smaller youth meeting and teachers meeting occur on Sat. and the offices would be used about 10-20 hrs. a week by 1-3 persons. I trust this information has been helpful. Sinc ely> ~ ~~~siMK~ Planck Reaching the Nations for Christ SIGNED I:II=pLy SIGNED DATE / / REDJ SEND PARTS I AND 3 INTACT - F-C)R~, 45 472 PART 3 WILL BE RETURNED WITH REPLY. POLY PAK (50 SETS14P472 II CITY OF RANCH0 CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM FROM: Rancho Cucamonga Police - Crime Prevention Unit 10510 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 (714) 989-6611 TO: City of Rancho Cucamonga DATE: 02/28/92 Planning Division PROJECT NO: Cup 92-02 ATTENTION: Anna-Lisa Hernandez REGARDING: Non-Construction Cup SAFETY CONCERNS LOCATION: 9746 Sixth Street Rancho Cucamonga FOR-USE BY: International Missions Fellowship INTRODUCTION: Physical exterior inspection of the site was conducted on Wednesday, February 26, 1992, at approximately 1:00 p.m., by Community Services Officer Sandra Fatland. In addition, a physical inspection was conducted on Thursday, February 27, 1992, at approximately 7:30 p.m., by Deputy Tim Parnell. His inspection included interviews with the surrounding businesses still in operation at that hour. On neither occasion was it possible to inspect the interior of the building for security concerns. All observations are with potential theft or personal safety concerns in mind. COMMENTS BY CSO FATLAND: Site inspection daylight hour PARKING: During my inspection there were eight moving vans, each taking up approximately 6 parking spaces, parked on the south side of the building, and throughout the parking area for the complex. There was no evidence of furniture being moved into the building. There is a moving company in a nearby building. HANDICAPPED PARKING: There is one, faded designated parking spot to the front of the site. Although the international handicapped symbol is visible, it is painted white, not blue. The required sign is also not present. (See attached for specifications.) Traffic Engineering should inspect this site for adequate number of handi- capped spots required for this use. BUILDING ACCESS: Access consists of two, metal front doors, one side door preceeded by steep, narrow, concrete steps on the south side, a roll up door on the south side, two roll up doors on the back side, and two metal doors on the rear side. No public access doors are wide enough for wheelchair entry. WINDOWS: There are four, vertical, single pane windows to the front of the building. If smashed, all are of a size to accommodate entry to the building. ALARM: No stickers or touch pads are visible to indicate the presence of an alarm system. LIGHTING: There are two, mercury vapor lights each on the front, side and rear. In addition, there are two incandescent light bulbs under the eave of the building. These are the sole sources of light for the entrances to the building and for the parking area. There is no street light pole nearby to supplement this existing lighting. Since not all those attending the church services on Wednesday evening can park adjacent to the building itself, lighting is inadequate to ensure visibility of the vehicles from the street, and therefore enhancing the possibility of thefts to vehicles, theft of vehicles, and the threat to personal safety. The current lighting design is adequate for primarily daytime operated commercial business. ROOF ACCESS: To the rear of the building is a ladder. A mesh cover ROOF ACCESS (Continued): is attached to the lower portion of the ladder. The bracket that secures mesh, metal screen is a conve- nient stepping peg to avoid the mesh screen and climb above it to the top of the ladder and the roof. The mesh on the ladder extends off of the ground 58" and the side bracket is only 27½" off of the ground. Very easy roof access. Also, there are three trees to the front of the building that are tall and strong enough to climb to the roof. Both ways to the roof may enable possible entry to the building via one of the eight sky lights. The roof is gravel and shows no signs of roof top numbers. POTENTIAL SAFETY CONCERNS: On the east, single, metal door entrance, at the top of the concrete steps, the lower portion of the wooden hand railing is missing. The remaining wood is weathered, ,split and not secure. COMMENTS BY DEPUTY SHERIFF TIMOTHY PARNELL: Business complex evening LIGHTING: Dark parking lot: Adequate for closed businesses, but not for open evening church meeting. Very dark street: No street lighting along the business complex on Sixth Street. Presents traffic and safety problems. 9776 Sixth Street: Right across driveway is Van Gordon Performance (989-4969). It is unknown if they work on cars on Sunday.- If so, this could disturb church services (noise), and eliminate at least one to two parking spaces. 9716 Sixth Street: Food service business had one truck outside that blocked marked parking spot. 9722-28 Sixth Street: Meat freezer business. This establishment uses 8-12 parking spots when open, six days a week, 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. They do have personnel there on Sunday occassionally. 9740 Sixth Street: Orbit Moving Systems. Deputy Parnell counted six moving. trucks. One marked truck blocked parking spaces. Definite parking problem. OVERALL: Security/safety problems that should be addressed prior to issuing a permit. CONCLUSION: The lighting, building construction, and parking situation is adequate for a commercial business complex. Both observations by CSO Fatland and Deputy Parnell emphasize security and personal safety concerns, as well as the limitations in parking. Consider also the attached list of crime report numbers of this area. REPORTS OF CRIME Police reports were taken on the following types of crime within approximately a quarter of a mile radius of the site between March 1, 1991 and February 29, 1992: Burglaries ...................... 24 Grand Thefts ..................... 3 Petty Thefts ..................... 2 Grand Theft Autos ................... 6 Robberies ....................... 1 Non-injury Traffic Collisions ............. 3 Hit and Run Traffic Collisions ............ 1 Vehicle Tamperings (Possible Attempted Theft) ..... 1 Vandalisms ...................... 4 Assaults ....................... 1 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 92-02 FOR INTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP OF CHURCHES, TO MAINTAIN RELIGIOUS ASSEMBLY AND CLASSES LOCATED WITHIN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT, SUBAREA 4 OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 209-211-33. A. Recitals. (i) International Missions Fellow'ship has filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use Permit No. 92-02 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application." (ii) On the 8th day of April 1992, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on April 8, 1992, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at 9746 Sixth Street with a street frontage of 618 feet and lot depth of 272.60 feet and is presently improved with six multi-tenant/light industrial buildings and 169 parking spaces; and (b) The property to the north of the subject site is vacant, General Industrial, the property to the south of that site consists of existing light Industrial, the property to the east is existing light Industrial, and the property to the west is existing single family residential. (c) That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 92-02 - INT'L. MISSIONS FELLOWSHIP APRIL 8, 1992 Page 2 (d) The application contemplates the operation of religious assembly and classes, in addition to ancillary office uses. (e) The proposed hours of operation are: Office hours, Monday through Friday 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.; church services from 11:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. on Sundays and 7:30 p.m. to 9:30 p.m. on Wednesdays; and youth meetings/teacher meetings on Saturdays. (f) Sufficient parking exists, for all existing and proposed use8. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs i and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That {he proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the DeVelopment Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. (b) That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. (c) That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below. 1) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Industrial Specific Plan, the Development Code, and all other applicable City Ordinances. 2) If the operation of the facility causes adverse effects upon adjacent businesses or operations, the Conditional Use Permit shall be brought before the Planning Commission for the consideration and possible termination of use. 3) Approval is granted for a church to operate on weeknights after 7:30 p.m. and on weekends. In addition, approval is granted for related office use during the week and on weekends. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 92-02 - INT'L. MISSIONS FELLOWSHIP APRIL 8, 1992 Page 3 4) The applicant shall obtain any necessary permits for tenant improvements. Plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division to show compliance. The building shall be inspected for compliance prior to utilization of the building. 5) .The use shall be limited to a maximum of six employees during normal weekday business hours. 6) Parking lot lighting shall be provided to satisfy the minimum requirements of the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department and the requirements specified in the Rancho Cucamonga Munigipal Code. A photometric lighting plan indicating compliance with the above-referenced requirements shall be submitted for review and approval of the Police Department and Planning Division, and the lights shall be installed per the approved plane prior to commencement of use. 7) Any signs proposed for the facility shall be designed in conformance with the comprehensive Sign Ordinance and shall require review and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation. 8) All required handicap parking spaces shall be posted with a sign and the space marked per California Vehicle Code requirements prior to commencement of use. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF APRIL, 1992. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 92-02 - INT'L. MISSIONS FELLOWSHIP APRIL 8, 1992 Page 4 I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of April 1992, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 8, 1992 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Scott Murphy, Associate Planner SUBJECT: MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 90-37 - FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE PARTNERS - A request to amend certain conditions of approval for a previously approved 60-acre comercial retail center in the Regional Related Commercial Designation (Subarea 4) of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard between 1-15 and Etiwanda Avenue - APN: 229-031-03 through 13, 15, 16, 20, and a portion of 59. BACKGROUND: On June 26, 1992, the Planning Comm~ ssion approved Conditional Use Permit 90-37, consisting of the conceptual Master Plan for Foothill Marketplace and the site plan and elevations for Price Club. Subsequently, the Commission approved the site plans and elevations for Wal-~Mart on February 26, 1992. In approving these projects, the Commission attached conditions requiring certain plans to be reviewed and approved prior to issuance of any building permits. Some of these plans (i.e., Integral Public Art, Uniform Sign Program, Site Amenities ) require review and approval by the Historic Preservation Commission and/or Planning Commission while other plans (i.e., grading and landscape plans, bus shelter design) will be reviewed and approved by staff. Following approval of Conditional Use Permit 90-37, working drawings were submitted for Phase 1 of Foothill Marketplace, encompassing the Price Club and Wal-Mart sites- In fact, Price Club has completed their second building plan check with fairly minor corrections. With plans for Phase 1, especially Price Club, moving quicker than the balance of the plans for the site, the applicant is concerned that a number of the required plans will not be approved to coincide with the desired construction timing of Price Club and Wal-Mart- As a result, the applicant has requested that the timing of some of the conditions of approval be modified to facilitate Price Club and Wal-Mart's building schedule · ANALYS I S: A · General: As noted in their request ( see Exhibit "A" ), the applicant wishes to modify seven Planning and three Historic Preservation conditions and to delete one Planning condition - Modification of these conditions would allow building permits for IT~ L PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 90-37 - FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE PARTNERS April 8, 1992 Page 2 Price Club and Wal-Mart to be issued but would withhold any subsequent building permits until all plans have been reviewed and approved. In evaluating the modification request, the Planning Commission may wish to consider the following information: 1. Plans to address Planning Conditions No. 8 (Uniform Sign Program), 10 (Street Furniture), 22 (Architectural Details), and 23 (On-Site Amenities) have all been reviewed by the Planning Commission once since the approval of the Master Plan- At each of these reviews, revisions were requested to the plans. The applicant has resubmitted plans for the Street Furniture, Architectural Details, and On-Site Amenities for which a workshop has been scheduled for April 16, 1992. Additionally, the revised Uniform Sign Program has been submitted and will be scheduled for a workshop- With the estimated construction of Price Club taking 5 1/2 months (from start of demolition), it is possible that all plans can be approved prior to the completion of the building- 2. Planning Condition No. 16 requires the landscaping of the freeway right-of-way adjacent to the site or payment of an in-lieu fee- Either the landscape plans must be approved or the in-lieu fees paid prior to the issuance of building permits- Staff feels that the in-lieu fee should be paid instead of installing the landscaping for the following reasons: a) Typically, Caltrans does not allow small segments of their right-of-way to be landscaped. b) A landscape Master Plan has not been established for the freeway corridor which would stipulate the plantings to be installed- c) The City will be reconstructing the freeway off-ramp in the future and the full extent of the improvements is not yet known. It would be counterproductive to install landscaping now, only to have it removed later. With payment of the in-lieu fee being the preferred course of action, no modification to the condition is necessary- 3. Planning Condition No. 17 requires specimen size trees (36-inch box or larger) at key locations across the site- The location and species will be reviewed with the landscape plans for each phase- Because these plans are reviewed and approved for each phase prior to the issuance of building permits, staff agrees with some minor changes to the condition to clarify this point- PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 90-37 - FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE PARTNERS April 8, 1992 Page 3 4. Planning Condition No. 21 states that if permission to grade off-site can not be obtained, landscape plans for Metropolitan Water District (MWD) shall be reviewed, prior to grading permit issuance, to determine the practicality of installing wrought iron fencing on top of the retaining wall- Because of the difficulty in obtaining information from MWD, staff feels that some flexibility may be warranted- Staff suggests that the review of wrought iron fencing may be postponed but the retaining wall, if necessary, should be designed to accommodate a block screen wall on top in the event wrought iron is no~ desired- Minor changes have been made to the condition to provide this flexibility. 5. Planning Condition No- 24 requires the final design of the retaining wall along the freeway off-ramp to be approved prior to issuance of any building permits. While the applicant is not proposing a wall at this time, staff feels that a condition should be retained to require any future wall to be reviewed and approved by the Design Review Committee prior to issuance of permits for the wall. The condition has been modified accordingly- 6 · Historic Preservation Condition No- I requires the oral history interviews to be completed prior to permit issuance. Because it appears the City will be managing the interviews, staff is in agreement to the applicant depositing funds to cover the estimated cost of the six interviews prior to the issuance of building permits- 7. Historic Preservation Condition No. 3 pertains to the relocation of the Guidera and DeCar!o houses to other sites in the City · The relocation of the houses is a function of demolition and grading permits- As a result, staff sees no reason to modify the condition- 8- Historic Preservation Condition No. 4 requires the ,integration of public art into the architectural design of the center- To date, very preliminary concepts have been submitted to staff for which comments have been returned to the applicant- Staff feels that the areas of greatest use of the integral art will be in areas other than Price Club and Wal-Mart- Rather than tying the condition to subsequent building permits, staff feels that the condition should require the integral public art to be approved by the Historic Preservation amd Planning Commissions prior to deeming any future project application complete. This will allow future applications to incorporate the art into the building designs at the initial stages - Presently, one application (In-N-Out) has been reviewed by the Design Review Committee but will not be scheduled for the Planning Commission so that the integral art can be incorporated into the design and reviewed prior to approval- PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 90-37 - FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE PARTNERS April 8, 1992 Page 4 With these modifications, staff feels that Price Club and Wal-Mart will be able to proceed without si ~nificantly sacrificing the intent of the original project approval- By tying approvals to phases subsequent to Phase l, staff is ooefortable that sufficient controls will exist to ensure compliance with the conditions of approval · B. Environmental Assessment: On August 21, 1992, the City Council issued a mitigated Negative Declaration for the project. Staff suggests that the Negative Declaration adequately mitigates potential impacts of the project and, as a result, no additional environmental review is required. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the project has been posted, and notices were sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the project site- RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the modification to Conditional Use Permit 90-37 through adoption of the attached Resolution. BB:SM:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Letter from Applicant Exhibit "B" - Resolution of Approval ( No. 91-86 dated June 26, 1991) Resolution of Approval for Modification (No- 91-86A) FOOTHILL P MODIFICATION APPLIC~TIux~ Foothill Marketplace is a new and exciting center located south of Foothill Boulevard between the Devore Freeway (I-15) and Etiwanda Avenue. Foothill Marketplace C.U.P. 90-37 (Resolution No. 91-86) was approved by the Planning Commission June 26, 19891. However, at this time we request certain modifications to the previously approved C.U.P. as follows: - Amend Condition Nn. 8 to read, "... prior to building permits other than Price Club and Wal-Mart". - Amend Condition No. 10 to read, "... prior to issuance of building permits other than Price Club and Wal-Mart". - Amend Condition No. 16 to read, "... prior to issuance of building permits other than Price Club and Wal-Mart". - Amend Condition No. 17 to read, ~... prior to issuance of building permits other than Price Club and Wal-Mart". - Amend Condition No. 21 to read, "... prior to issuance of building permits other than Price Club and Wal-M~rt". - Amend Condition No. 22 to read, '... prior to the issuance of any permits other than grading, landscape, utilities, lighting and building permits for Price Club and Wal-Mart". " .prior to the issuance - Amend Condition No. 23 to read, .. of building permits other than Price Club and Wal-Mart". - Delete Condition No. 24. Our current design does not include a retaining wall at this location. HISTORICAL No. i - Amend to read no building permits until monies are deposited to 'H.P.C. for their use in attaining the required oral history. No. 3 - Amend to read, "... no building permits will be issued other than Price Club and Wal-Mart". No. 4 - Amend to read, "... no building permits will be issued other than Price Club and Wal-Mart". These modifications are required to facilitate Price Club and Wal- Wart's building schedule. It is not any indication that Foothill Marketplace Partners will not fulfill their responsibilities to theses conditions. -The above items have been submitted for review and approval to staff and Planning Commission. We are confident that by working with staff and the Planning Commission that these items will be approved before. building permits are required or shortly thereafter. These modifications will assure us and the City there will be no hold up on Price Club and Wal-Mart~s building permits. RESOLUTION NO. 91-86 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 90-37, A REQUEST FOR MASTER PLAN APPROVAL FOR A ±60 ACRE RETAIL/COMMERCIAL CENTER CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 550,000 SQUARE FEET OF LEASABLE SPACE AND A REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN AND BUILDING ELEVATIONS FOR THE PRICE CLUB FACILITY IN THE REGIONALO RELATED COMMERCIAL DESIGNATION OF THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN (SUBAREA 4), LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BETWEEN INTERSTATE 15 AND ETIWANDA AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 229-031-03 THROUGH 13, 15, 16, AND 20. A. Recitals. (i) Foothill ~arketplace Partners has filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use Permit 90-37 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit is referred to as "the application." (ii) On the 26th day of June 1991, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on June 26, 1991, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to a =60 acre parcel of land located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard between Interstate 15 and Etiwanda Avenue, with a street frontage of ~2,175 feet along Foothill Boulevard and ±600 feet along Etiwanda Avenue. The site is presently designated for Regional Related Commercial and Light Industrial uses and is developed with single-family residences, a winery complex, and a converted gas station; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 91-86 CUP 90-37 - FOOTHILL MARKET PLACE June 26, 1991 Page 2 (b) The property to the north is designated for Commercial uses and is improved with a mix of uses including a church, single-family residences, retail stores, and a converted winery. The property to the south is designated for Industrial uses and is developed with an industrial business, is being developed with a water transmission facility, and is vacant. The property to the east is designated for Commercial and Residential uses and is vacant and developed with single-family residences. The property ~ the west, opposite the Interstate 15 Freeway, is designated for Commercial uses and is vacant; and (c) The project will comply with all minimum standards of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and (d) In conjunctfon with this application, the applicant has submitted a request to amend the land use designation within the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan from .Light Industrial to Regional Related Commercial. Provisions were previously incorporated into the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan to allow for such a change through review and approval of a Master Plan; and (e) The development of a ~550,000 square foet retail/commercial center is consistent with the Regional Related Commercial designation of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan and the Commercial designation of the General Plan. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. (b) That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. (c) That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code and Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a mitigated Negative Declaration. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 91-86 CUP 90-37 - FOOTHILL MARKET PLACE June 26, 1991 Page 3 Planninq Division 1) Approval of the Conditional Use Permit is for the conceptual master plan for the entire shopping center and the detailed site plan and elevations for Price Club. All other buildings and/or pads will require the approval of a separate Development Review or · Conditional Use Permit application, as required by the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. 2) Approval of Conditional Use Permit 90-37 is contingent upon approval of Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment 90-04 and Tentative Parcel Map No. 13724. 3) Prior to the issuance of any grading or building permits, a Tree Removal Permit application shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner. An arborist's report shall be prepared to address the possible preservation and/or relocation of heritage trees on-site. The arborist shall be selected by the City and paid for by the developer. 4) No occupancy shall be permitted for any user until all street improvements have been installed to the satisfaction of the City. 5) If phasing is proposed, the phasing plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission prior to the issuance of any building permits for the center. 6) No permanent outdoor storage of shopping carts shall be permitted, unless otherwise approved by the Planning Commission. 7) Parking lots along Foothill and Etiwanda shall be fully screened from the street through the use of ±3 foot berms, low screen walls, and/or shrub planting. The final details shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of any building permits for the center. 8) A Uniform Sign Program shall be prepared for the center and shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission prior to the issuance of any building permits for the center. The program shall consist of all on-site signage including, but not limited to, monument signs, directional signs, and wall signs. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 91-86 CUP 90-37 - FOOTHILL MARKET PLACE June 26, 1991 Page 4 9) All future pads shall be seeded and irrigated for erosion control prior to occupancy of any building. Details shall be included with the landscape and irrigation plans. The plans shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Planner prior to the issuance of any building permits for the center. · 10) All street furniture, including benches, bike racks, potted plants, light bollards and standards, drinking fountains, trash receptacles, etc., shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission prior to the issuance of any building permits for the center. 11) Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours. 12) The entije site shall be kept free from trash and debris at all times and, in no event, shall trash and debris remain for more than 24 hours. 13) There shall be provision for security patrel of the shopping center at least three times per evening, seven days per week, between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. by a licensed private patrol. 14) Bus shelters on Etiwanda Avenue and on Foothill Boulevard shall be installed with street improvements and shall be architecturally compatible to the center. Final location and design of the bus shelters shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of any building permits for the center. 15) Any transformers, service areas, or trash enclosures located near the setbacks of Etiwanda Avenue and Foothill Boulevard shall only'be considered when they are screened by using a combination of walls, berms, and landscaping, 16) The freeway right-of-way adjacent to the project shall be landscaped, or an in-lieu fee paid, in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No. 87-185. The landscape plans shall be approved by the City Planner or the in-lieu fee shall be paid prior to the issuance of any building permits for the center. 17) Specimen-size trees (36-inch box or larger) shall be provided at key locations including, but not limited to,' entries, plazas, on-site intersections, etc. The PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 91-86 CUP 90-37 - FOOTHILL MARKET PLACE June 26, 1991 Page 5 type and location of the trees shall be shown on the final landscape plans which shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of any building permits for the center. 18) Any outdoor vending machines shall be architecturally integrated into the design of the buildings. The · vending machines shall not extend out into the pedestrian walkways. A recycling permit application shall be submitted for any recycling center and shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of any building permits for the center. 19) Trash enclosures shall be designed to incorporate the following design features to the satisfaction of the City Planner: a. Architecturally integrated into the design of the shopping center. b. Separate pedestrian access, including .a self- closing door, that does not require opening of the main doors. c. Roll-up doors. d. Trash bins with counter-weighted lids. e. Architecturally integrated overhead trellis. f. Chain link screen on top of the enclosure to prevent trash from blowing out of the enclosure. The chain link shall be hidden from view. 20) The applicant shall make a good-faith effort to obtain permission to grade onto adjacent properties in order to eliminate the need for retaining walls along the south property line. Such evidence shall be presented to the City Planner prior to the issuance of grading permits. 21) If permission to grade off-site cannot be obtained, landscape plans for Metropolitan Water District shall be reviewed to determine the practicality of installing wrought iron fencing on top of the retaining wall in order to minimize the impact of the solid wall. The plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of grading permits. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 91-86 CUP 90-37 - FOOTHILL MARKET PLACE June 26, 1991 'Page 6 22) Prior to the issuance of any permits or acceptance of any future application, the applicant shall submit architectural plans, colors, and details to further define the architectural vocabulary expected for the center. The information (including the final colors and verification of all roof-mounted equipment for · Price Club) shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission. 23) A plan of development for on-site amenities shall be established to "tie" the site together through pedestrian-scale linkages. Elements to consider include, but are not limited to, hardscape treatment and patterns, landscaping, trellises, kiosks, street furniture! seating area, plazas, building features, signage, etc. The final plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission prior to the issuance of any building permits for the center. 24) The final design of the retaining wall atong the freeway off-ramp shall be reviewed and approved by the Design Review Committee prior to issuance of any building permits for the center. 25) Pursuant to provisions of California Public Resources Code Section 21089(b), this application shall not be operative, vested, or final, nor will building permits be issued or a map recorded, until (1) the Notice of Determination (NOD) regarding the associated environmental action is filed and posted with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Bernardino; and (2) any and all required filing fees assessed pursuant to California Fish and Game Code Section 711.4, together with any required handling charges, are paid to the County Clerk of the County of San Bernardino. The applicant shall provide the Planning Department with a stamped and conformed copy of the NOD together with a receipt showing that all fees have been paid. In the event this application is determined exempt from such filing fees pursuant to the provisions of the California Fish and Game Code, or the guidelines promulgated thereunder, except for payment of any required handling charge for filing a Certificate of Fee Exemption, this condition shall be deemed null and void. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 91-86 CUP 90-37 - FOOTHILL MARKET PLACE June 26, 1991 Page 7 26) Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided at a rate equal to 5 percent of the required automobile parking stalls, up to a maximum of 100 bicycle storage spaces. Security racks shall be provided for each storage space and shall be located near main building entrances in highly visible areas to minimize theft and vandalism. An aisle or other space shall be · provided for bicycles to enter and leave the storage spaces with a minimum width of 5 feet to the front or rear of a standard 6-foot bicycle parked in the space. Historic Preservation 1) The applicant shall underwrite the cost of not more than six interviews as part of a City approved Oral History Program of the pioneer wine-making families of the subject area. The program shall be completed prior to the issuance of any building permits for the center. 2) The existing structures shall be documented fully according to HABS/HAER standards by an architect approved by the City and paid for by the applicant. The documents shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Planner prior to the issuance of permits for either demolition or relocation. 3) The applicant shall offer to donate the Guidera and DiCarlo homes to persons demonstrating ownership of a parcel within the City of Rancho Cucamonga suitable for such relocation. These homes shall be available for such donation over a period of 180 days and the applicant shall pay for relocation costs to the point of delivery of the houses to the lots, with the foundations for the homes to be completed by others. Advertisements shall be placed in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin and The Sun newspapers, at a minimum, every weekend during the 180-day period. The size of the advertisement shall be one-eighth page and the content shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the submittal to the newspapers. Parcels located in the historic community of Etiwanda will be given first preference. All documentation demonstrating compliance with this condition shall be submitted to the City Planner prior to the issuance of demolition permits. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 91-86 CUP 90-37 - FOOTHILL MARKET PLACE June 26, 1991 Page 8 4) The applicant shall incorporate the familial and architectural past of the area into commissioned public art integral to the architectural design of the project. This artwork shall portray southern Etiwanda's wine-making past in a realistic style and the applicant will submit no less than three alternatives, in no less than three different · artistic mediums, for the Historic Preservation Commission's review. The final specifications for this architecturally integrated artwork shall be approved by the Planning Commission prior to the issuance of any building permits for the center. 5) The applicant shall use personal names and those of associative qualities, such as winery names or wine labels, on the project site wherever possible and appropriate with the approval of the center's Uniform Sign Program. 6) No demolition permits shall be issued for existing structures within the project site until the.issuance of building permits for any new structure. Enqineerinq Division 1) Existing Overhead Utilities a. Foothill Boulevard - An in-lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (telecommunication and electrical) on the opposite side of Foothill Boulevard shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of building permits. The fee shall be one-half of the City adopted unit amount times the length from the center of Etiwanda Avenue to the westerly terminus. b. Etiwanda Avenue - An in-lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (electrical except for the 66 kv electrical) on the opposite side of Etiwanda Avenue shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of building permits. The fee shall be one-half the City adopted unit amount times the length from the center of Foothill Boulevard to the south project boundary. c. Overhead utility service lines which cross Foothill Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue shall be removed concurrently with the removal of the existing houses on the south side of Foothill Boulevard. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 91-86 CUP 90-37 - FOOTHILL MARKET PLACE June 26, 1991 Page 9 2) Foothill Boulevard shall be constructed from Etiwanda Avenue to the westerly project boundary as follows: a. Full width on the south side including the median curb. b. The ultimate backbone system on the north side · consisting of two travel lanes (27-foot wide pavement) and the median curb or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. c. Landscape the median island. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover the cost of one-half width of landscaping fronting his project from future development of across- the-street properties. d. Construct a complete intersection of Etiwanda Avenue and Foothill Boulevard with transitions to meet existing pavement east on Foothill Boulevard and north on Etiwanda Avenue. Also the traffic signals shall be modified at the intersection of Etiwanda Avenue and Foothill Boulevard. Both items shall be as approved by the City Engineer. If improvement of the intersection requires alterations to the existing building(s) at the Foothill Bouelvard and Etiwanda Avenue intersection, the structure(s) shall be reviewed for their historical significance by the Historic preservation Commission and Planning Commission and appropriate mitigation measures established. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover the cost of the mitigation measures assocated with the intersection improvements from future development as it occurs on the affected properties. e. The developer shall be eligible for fee credits against and reimbursement from the Transportation Development Fee for the portion of improvements determined by the City Engineer to be of supplemental size, length, or capacity over that needed or the impact of this development in conformance with Ordinance No. 455. 3) The traffic signal shall be installed at the main entrance on Foothill Boulevard at the developer's expense. 4) The median island within Foothill Boulevard shallbe moved southerly so that it is symmetrical about the t--ly PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO- 91-86 CUP 90-37 - FOOTHILL MARKET PLACE June 26, 1991 Page 10 centerline or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 5) The Foothill Boulevard busbay shall be moved westerly to be as close as possible to the median opening to reduce potential jaywalking across Foothill Boulevard. · 6) Etiwanda Avenue shall be widened on both sides as necessary to accommodate the street improvements necessary to mitigate the traffic impacts of the project as required by the City Engineer. 7) Provide double (opposite direction) left turn lanes within Etiwanda Avenue to serve the project entrances,~ Chestnut Avenue, and a future driveway on the east side of Etiwanda Avenue, or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer 8) Provide a curb-adjacent sidewalk for the busbay on Foothill Boulevard. Also, the curb-adjacent.sidewalk for the busbay on Etiwanda Avenue shall be minimized. 9) Provide a meandering sidewalk in accordance with City Standard No. 304 on Etiwanda Avenue. The sidewalk on Foothill Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue shall meet all driveways at the zero face of the curb return except for the main entrance on Foothill Boulevard and as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 10) A final traffic study showing calculations for the determination of the length of all left turn lanes on Foothill Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue based on post 2010 traffic conditions shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. All street facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. 11) A lot line adjustment shall be recorded to incorporate the northerly portion of APN 229-021-59 and the westerly portion of APN 229-031-16 into this project prior to the issuance of building permits. 12) All of the project driveways and the internal drive aisles to be used by trucks shall be designed to accommodate the Caltrans standard 50-foot radius turn template unless justification is provided for a lesser design radius as approved by the City Engineer. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 91-86 CUP 90-37 - FOOTHILL MARKET PLACE June 26, 1991 Page 11 13) The property necessary for the proposed freeway off- ramp at the northwest corner of the site shall be reserved. It appears that Caltrans will not allow the retaining wall shown on the plans; therefore, additional land to what is shown on the plans will need to be reserved as approved by Caltrans and the City Engineer. Also, the project plans will need to I be modified accordingly. 14) Drainage fees for the development shall be paid as follows: a. Etiwanda/San Sevaine area fees for the portion of the site within that area boundary (easterly 6± acres). b. General City area fees for the portion of this site outside of the Etiwanda/San Sevaine area. c. A payment equivalent to the Day Creek Mello Roos Assessment of $4,675 per acre for the pertion of the site currently outside the Day Creek Channel Mello Roos District boundary. 15) Approval shall be obtained from the Municipal Water District and San Bernardino County Flood Control District to accept the existing flows from north of Foothill Boulevard to the facility along Arrow Highway and Day Creek Channel. If such approvals cannot be obtained, alternate facilities such as those required by the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Drainage Policy (Area 9) shall be provided as approved by the City Engineer. 16) Intersection drains shall be provided across Foothill Boulevard at Etiwanda Avenue sized to convey as much flow as feasible as approved by the City Engineer. 17) Drainage facilities shall be extended to the north side of Foothill Boulevard along the project frontage to collect as much flow as feasible as approved by the City Engineer. 18) Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance for disposal of the drainage entering the property from the adjacent Caltrans area to the west. 19) The small portion of the southeast corner of the property shall be regraded to drain to the Municipal Water District facility. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 91-86 CUP 90-37 - FOOTHILL MARKET PLACE June 26, 1991 Page 12 20) Construct storm drain facilities to serve the site generally as shown on the plans and as described in the project's preliminary drainage report subject to final plan check and a final drainage report as approved by the City Engineer. 21) Easements for and permission to construct storm drain · facilities on and convey flows to off-site properties shall be obtained and provided as approved by the City Engineer. 22) Easements for public storm drains within the site shall be provided. 23) The developer and the City shall enter into an agreementsthat transfers maintenance responsibilities from the City to the developer for the drainage facilities serving Foothill Boulevard at such time that alternate facilities for disposing of the Foothill Boulevard drainage is provided and approved by the City Attorney and City Engineer. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF JUNE 1991. Larry T. ' el, Chairman I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 26th day of June 1991, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MCNIEL, MELCHER, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, VALLETTE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS P R OJ E C T #: - 7 SU~ECT: ~~ ~~~--~ APPLICANT: ~ ~~ ~~/ LOCATION: ~ ~/~ ~ 7~~ 7~ ~ ~~~ Those items che~ are ~ions of ~val. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (714) 989-1861, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. TIme Limits ~ / 1. Approval shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, if building permits are / /~ not issued or approved use has not commenced within 24 months from the date of approval. 2. Development/Design Review shall be approved prior to / / , /----J 3. Approval of Tentative Tract No. is granted subject to the approval of /---J v/ 4. The developer shall commence, participate in, and consurnrnme or cause to be commenced participated in, or consummated, a Mello-Roos Community Fadlitles District (CFD) for the Rancho Cucarnonga Fire Protection District to finance construction and/or maintenance of a fire station to serve the development. The station shall be located, designed, and built to all specifications of the Rancho Cucarnonga Fire Protection District, and shall become the District's property upon corrq:)letion. The equipment shall be selected by the District in accordance with its needs. In any building of a station, the developer shall comply with all applicable laws and regulations. The CFD shall be formed by the District and the developer by the time rscordation of the final map occurs. 5. Prior to recordation of the final map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes first, the applicant shall consent to, or participate in, the establishment of a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District for the construction and maintenance of necessary school facilities. However, if any school district has previously established such a Community Facilities District, the applicant shall, in the alternative. consent to the annexation of the project site into the territory of such existing District prior to the recordation of the final map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes first. Further, it the affected school district has not formed a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District within twelve months from the date of approval of the project and prior to the recordation of the final map or issuance of building permits for said I:H'oject, this condition shall be deemed null and void. ~ -2'9! 1 of'J2 This condition shall be waived if the City receives notice that the applicant and all affected school districts have emered into an agreement to privately accommodate any and all school impacts as a result of this project. 6. Prior to recordation of the final map or prior to issuance of building permits when no map is . ../ / involved, written certification from the affected water district that adequate sewer and water facilities are or will be available to serve the proposed project shall be submitted to the Department of Comrnunlty Developmere. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prio rto issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. · B. SIte Development ~/ 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which / / include site plans, architectural elevations. extedor materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, and ,~"~7'~-///-~ ~'Z-~y'-,~'~r~ Specific Plan and Planned Community. v/ 2. Prior to any use of the i~roject site or business activity being commenced thereon, all .../ Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. v/ 3. Occupancy of the facility shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and /_-.J State Fire Marshairs regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division to show compliance. The building shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. V/ 4. Revised site plans and building elevations incoq~orating all Conditions of Approval shall be __J / submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. v/' 5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for /----J~ consistency pdorto issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.), or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom hot subdivision, or appmved use has commenced, whichever comes first. V/ 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development / / Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community Plans or Specitic Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. ~/ 7. A detailed on-site lighting plan shall be reviewed and approved by tl~ City Planner and --J /- Sheriffs Department (989-6611 ) prior to the issuance of building permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method ot shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. 8. If no centralized trash receptacles am provided, all trash pick-up shall be for individual units J J with all receptacles shielded from public view. V/ 9. Trash receptacle(s) am required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, --J / and the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. v/ 10. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall ~ / be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination o! concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner. L. ' ) ~' ~. ~,g,, 2 or 12 11.Street names shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with ___/,___.J__ the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map. V/ 12. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, __J · including proper illumination. 13. A detailed plan indicating trail widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing, and weed control, in accordance with City Master Trail drawings. shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval priorto approval and recordation of the Final Tract Map and prior to approval of street improvement and grading plans· Developer shall upgrade and construct all trails. including fencing and drainage devices, in conjunction with street imProvemlnts- 14. The Covenants. Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs) shall not prohibit the keeping of equine / / animals where zoning requirements forthe keeping of said animals have been met. Individual lot owners in subdivisions shall have the option of keeping said animals without the necessity of appealing to boards of directors or homeowners' associations for amendments to the CC&Rs. 15. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the / /'- Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Divisions and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of building permits. whichever occurs first. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer. v/ 16. Allparkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintain.ed bytheproperty / / owner, homeowners' association, or other means ar,.,eptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 17. Solar access easements shall be dedicated for the purpose of assuming that each lot or // dwelling unit shall have the right to receive sunlight across adjacent lots or units for use of a solar energy system. The easements may be contained in a Declaration of Restrictions for the subdivision which shall be recorded concurrently with the recordation of the final map or issuance of permits, whichever comes first. The easements Shall prohibit the casting of shadows by vegetation, structures, fixtures or any other object, except for utility wires and similar objects, pursuant to Development Code Section 17.08.060-G-2. 18. The project contains a designated Historical Landmark. The site shall be deveiopecl and / /~ maintained in accordance with the Historic Landmark Alteration Permit No. · Any further modifications to the site including, but not limited to. exterior alterations and/or interior alterations which affect the exterior of the buildings or structures, removal of landmark trees. demolition. relocation, reconstruction of buildings or structures. or changes to the site, shall require a modification to the Historic Landmark .Alteration Permit subject to Historic Preservation Commission review and approval. C. 'Building Design 1. An alternative energy system is required to provide domestic hot water for all dwelling units ---J -/ and for heating any swimming pool or spa, unless other alternative energy systems are demonstrated to be of equivalent capacity and efficiency. All swimming pools installed at the time of initial development shall be supplemented with solar heating. Details shall be included in the building plans and shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. All dwellings shall have the front, side and rear elevations upgraded with architectural ----:/--/-- treatment, detailing and increased delineation of sudace treatment subject to City Planner review and approval pnor to issuance of building permits. Corn t~uon Dire' 3. Standard patio cover plans for use by the Homeowners' Association shall be submitted for / .J City Planner and Building Official review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. / 4. All roof appurtenances, including air conditionere and other roof mounted equipment and/or /----J '- projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound bu~ered lrom adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Division. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner, Details shall be included in building plans, D. Parking and Vehicular Access (Indicate details on building plane) v/ 1. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall / / contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curb). V/ 2. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be J / provided throughout the development to connect owe Ilings/units/buiidings with open spaces/ plazas/recreational uses. v'/ 3. All parking spaces shall be double stdped per City standards and all driveway aisles, .J / entrances, and exits shall.be striped per City standards. 4. All units shall be provided with garage door openers i~ driveways are less than 18 feet in .J / - .depth from back of sidewalk. 5. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions shall restrict the storage of recreational vehicles ----/ /"- on this site unless they are the principal source o! transportation for the owner and prohibit parking on interior circulation aisles other than in designated visitor parking areas. 6. Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the City Planner, City Engineer, and Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. E. Landscaping (for publlcty maintained landscape areas, reler to Section N.) / 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including siopa planting and model home tandscap- ---J / ing in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted tor City Ranner review and approval priorto the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case ot a custom lit subdivision. 2. Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction bamer · / in accordance with the Mu nicipal Code Section 19.08.110, and so noted on the grading plans. The location ot those trees to be preserved in place and new locations tor transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape pins. The applicant shall follow all of the arborisrs recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting and trimming methods. 3. Aminimumof treespergrossacre,comprisedotthefoliowingsizes, shall be Pr°vided / J within the project: % - 48- inch box or larger. % - 36- inch box or larger, % - 24- inch box or larger, % - 15-gallon. and __ % - 5 gallon. V/ 4, A minimum of 25' % of trees planted within the project shall be specimen size trees - ---J 24-inch box or larger. t/ 5. Within parking fits, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for even/three / /. parking Stalls, sufficient to shade 50/0 of the parking area at solar noon on August 21. 6. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one ' tree per 30 linear feet of building. ~ / v/ 7. Aii private slope banks 5 feet or less in verticalheight andof5:l orgreaterslope, but less than ._J / 2:1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. V/ 8. AIIprivateslopesinexcessof5feet,butlessthan8 feet inverticalheightandof2:l orgreater / / slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1 -gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, lope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall also inclu~i~ one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 9. For single family residential development, all slope planting and imgation shall be continu-' / /-- ously maintained in a healthy and thdving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer. Prior to releasing occupancy for those u nits, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Division to determine that they are in satisfactory 10. For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are respen- / / sible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way. All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debds and maintained in a healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage. 11. Front yard landscaping shall be required per the Development Code and/or / / · This requirement shall be in addition to the required street trees and slope planting. 12. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be / / included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and approval and coo rdinated Ior consistency with any pad<way landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Division. 13. Special landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, specimen size trees, meander- ./ ing sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensified landscaping, is required along /~.7;/-/iZ.Z, ~--y-,~, V/ 14. Landscaping and imgatlon systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on __/ / the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained ~ the developer. v/ 15. AII walls shall be pmvided wifh decorative treatment. lflocated in public maintenance amas, / / the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division. v/ 16. Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for City Planner review and / approval prior to issuance of building permits. These criteria shall encourage the natural growth charac'tedstics of the selected tree species. v/ 17. Landscaping and irrigation Shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of Xedscape as defined in Chapter 19.16 of the Rancho Cucamenga Municipal Code. 2/9 t 5 or 12 F. Signs ~/' 1. ~esignsi~t~onthesubmffi~pl~ns~re~ep~u~lonly~nd~P~of ~his~mv~l. /~/~ Any s~ns pm~d for this deve~p~n~ sh~ll ~ly with ~he S~n Ordinate ~ sh~ll require ~p~r~te ~lic~tion ~ ~pmv~l by ~he Pl~nni~ Divis~n pr~r ~o ins~lla~n of ~ny S~RS. 2. A U n~orm S~n PrOram for this deve~pmem shall ~ subm~ for ~ review a~ / / ~mval pnor to issua~e of bui~i~ ~s. 3. Dir~o~ monumem s~n(s) shall ~ pmv~ for a~n~m, ~ominium, or town~s / /-- pr~r to cu~y a~ shall r~uim separate a~l~at~n a~ ~mval by the Pla~i~ D~is~n pdor to issuame of ~i~i~ ~s. G. Environmental 1. ~e deve~r shall pmv~e ea~ pms~ive ~yer w~en ~t~e of the Fourth Street Ro~ / /__ Crusher pmje~ in a sta~ard fo~at as detemn~ by the C~y Planner, p~r to a~epti~ a cash de~s~ on any pmpe~. 2. ~e develo~r shall provide ea~ pms~e ~yer w~en ~t~e of the C~y A~pt~ / /-- S~ial Studies Zone for the Red Hill Faun, in a ~a~affi fo~at as dete~in~ by the C~y Planner, p~r to a~e~i~ a ~sh de~s~ on a~ pm~. 3. ~e develo~r shall pmv~e e~h pms~aive buyer w~en ~t~e of the Foothill Freeway / / pmjea in a standard fo~at as dete~in~ by t~ C~ Plan~r, p~or to ,a~epti~ a cash de~s~ on a~ pr~ny. 4. A final a~u~l m~n shall ~ subm~ed br C~ Planner rev~w a~ ~mval pr~r to the / / issua~e of ~i~ing ~s. The final re~ shall dis~ss the level ol ime~r ~ise a~enuatbn to bebw 45 CNEL, t~ ~i~i~ romedais a~ ~n~m~ion t~hn~ues pmv~, a~ ~ ~mpdate, venfy the ed~a~ of t~ mH~atbn masures. The bui~i~ plans will ~ ch~k~ br ~o~e wffh l~ ~t~at~n measures ~main~ in t~ final re~n. H. ~her Agen¢l~ / 1. E~ rge~ ~m~a~ ~ shall ~ ~v~ in a~ma~ w~h R~ Cu~m~a Fire J / Pmte~n Diem Sa~a~. ~ 2. E~ ~e~ a~ess shall ~ ~v~, maime~e Ir~ a~ cmar, a miniram of 26 feet w~e / J ~ all times dud~ ~~n in a~ffim w~h Ra~ Cu~m~ Fire Pmt~bn Dist~ r~im~nts. ~ 3. Pr~r to ~ame of ~i~i~ ~s br ~i~ ~t~bn, e~de~e shall be / / subm~ to t~ Ram~ Cu~m~ Rm Pmt~n D~ t~ te~ra~ water ~ly for fire pmlm~n ~ avaitM, ~mi~ ~t~n ol rffiuir~ tim ~otffi~n s~tem. ~ 4. ~e ~m shall ~m~ ~ U. S. Po~al ~ to ~te~i~ t~ ~ate ty~ a~ J / ~at~n of mail ~xes. Mull-family res~emial devemms shall ~vl a ~lid oremead stmaure for rail ~xes w~h ~ae I~ffii~. ~e final ~t~n of tN rail ~xes and the des~n of the ovemead ~Nmre shall N su~ to C~ Pinner rev~ a~ a~mval prior to the issua~e of ~i~ing ~s. 5. For projects using septic tank facilities, written certification of acceptability, including all --J /. supportive information, shall be obtained from the San Bemardino County Department of Environmental Health and submitted to the Building Official prior to the issuance of Septic Tank Permits, and prior to issuance of building permits. SC - 2/91 6 of 12 Cornpict~o~ IPPLIOINT$ SHILL OONT~OT THE BUILOIN~ ~NO 8~FBY OIVISION, ffl~) g~-l~a, ffO~ I. $Re ~vBIO~Bnl cal C~e, UnHo~ Plumbi~ C~e, Nailhal El~ ~e, a~ all other a~li~bte ~des,: o~ina~es, a~ r~ulat~ns in eff~ at the tim of issua~e of mlat~e ~its. Please ~ma~ the Bui~i~ a~ Safe~ D~isbn for ~pies of the C~e A~pt~n Offiina~e a~ ~l~ble han~uts. 2. P~r to issuan~ of ~i~i~ permits for a n~ res~emial ~elli~ uriC(s) or mawr a~n / to existi~ uriC(s), the ~li~m shall pay ~ve~p~nt f~s a the est~lish~ rate. ~ch fees may i~lude, but am mt lim~ to: C~ Beaut~bn Fee, Paffi Fee, Drainage Fee, Systems Deve~pmem Fee, Pe~ a~ Plan Ch~i~ Fees, a~ ~1 Fees. ~ 3. P~r to i~ua~e of ~i~ing ~s for a n~ ~mial or i~ustdal developmere or / a~ition to an existi~ deve~p~m, the ~li~m shall ~y deve~pment fees at the est~lished rate. Such fees may i~lude, ~ are ~t li~ to: Syste~ Deve~pment Fee, Drainage Fee, ~ol Fees, Perm~ and Plan Ch~ Fees. / 4. Street a~resses shall ~ pmvid~ by the Bui~i~ ~1, a~er tra~mel ~ r~rdation / /__ a~ p~r to iBua~e of ~i~i~ ~s. J. Exlmlng ~urM 1. Prov~e ~lia~e w~h the Unffo~ Bui~i~ ~ for the ~e~ li~ cleara~es / / ~ns~ed~ use, area, a~ fire-resi~ene~ of ex~i~ ~i~i~s. 2. Existi~ ~i~ings shall ~ rode to ~ w~h ~ff~ ~i~i~ a~ zoni~ r~u~t~ns for ~ / t~ ime~ use or the ~ildi~ shall ~ demlis~. / 3. Ex~ti~ s~age di~sal fadl~ies shall ~ remv~, fil~ a~or ~ to ~ly with the / /.-- Unffo~ P~mi~ C~e a~ Unffo~ Bui~i~ ~e. / 4. U~e~mu~ on-~e milRies are to be ~t~ a~ s~n on ~i~i~ ~ans ~bm~ for / / ~i~i~ ~R ~t~n. K. Gr~lng ~ 1. Gradi~ of t~ su~ ~y s~ll ~ in ~m~ wRh t~ Unffo~ ~i~i~ ~e, C~ / / Gradi~ Sta~, a~ m~ gr~i~ ~m~s. h fill gr~ing plan shall ~ in su~amil ~Nom~ Hh t~ mv~ gr~ / 2. A ~ils r~ s~ll ~ ~r~ by a quaIliad e~i~r I~e~ by t~ Stae of Cal~omia to / / / 3. ~e devemm ~ ~t~ wRhin t~ ~il eros~n ~mml ~u~r~s; a ~il D~tu~a~e / / Pe~ ~ reired. Pi~ ~m~ San Bemffii~ ~u~ ~anmm of ~Rure at (714) ~7-2111 for ~ ~mt~n. ~mma~n of m~ ~ shall ~ sum~ to the C~y pmr to t~ msua~e of rough gr~i~ ~. 4. A g~l re~d shall ~ pre~r~ by a qualff~ e~i~r or g~ist a~ sum~ at the tim of ~l~t~n for gradi~ plan ch~. / 5. ~e final gradi~ plans shall ~ ~mplet~ a~ ~prov~ ~rto issua~e of ~i~i~ ~rm~s. J /- CornDleuo~ Date 6. AS a cuslom-ict sut~ivis~on, t~ ~ollowi~ r~uir~mms s~afi ~ a.SumW s~afi ~ ~sl~ a~ an a~r~mnt ex~ul~ ~uara~i~ ~l~t~n o~ all on-s~e ~raina~ la~ifili~s n~essa~ ~or de~at~ aft ~rc~ls ~o me smis~a~n ol m~ ~. ~ro~al~ ~as~m~s lot sals ~is~sal ot ~raina~ waist ~at am ~u~ onto / / Bui~i~ a~ Safe~ D~is~n p~r to i~ua~ of gradi~ and ~i~i~ peaits. c. On-site drainage improverams, n~essa~ for d~atedng a~ prote~i~ the su~ded / /-- pro~nies, are to ~ install~ pdor to is~a~ of ~i~i~ ~s for ~nstm~n u~n any parcel that may ~ subj~ to drainage fbws emen~, leavi~, or w~hin a parcel relat~e to which a ~i~i~ ~ is r~ue~. d. Final gradi~ plans for each panel are to be sub~ to the Bui~i~ and Safety J / Divisbn for ~mval pr~r to issua~e of ~i~i~ a~ gradi~ ~s. (This my be on an i~rememal or ~site ~sis.) e. All s~ ~nks in excess of 5 feet in venal he~ shall ~ ~ w~h native grasses or plamed w~h grou~'~ver for ems~n ~mml u~n ~mplet~n of gradi~ or ~me other a~emat~e mt~ of ems~n ~mml shall ~ ~m~t~ to the sati~a~n of the Bui~i~ ~ial, In a~ion a ~a~m i~mbn sy~em shall ~ pmv~ed, ~is r~uiremem ~es mt release the ~a~deve~r from ~iia~e w~h the s~pe plaming r~uire~ms of S~ion 17.~.040 1 of t~ Deve~p~m ~e, APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (714) 989-1862, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: L. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1. Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets / / community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. Private easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder traiLs, etc.) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. v'/ 2. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets ---J ./ (measured from street centedine): v,,,,F/~/.,,,~/.~' ~ on ~,,~-,yT,/,f//Az/--~ total leet on total feet on 3. An irrevocable offer of dedicatlon tor -foot wide roadway easement shall be made / for all private streets or drives, 4. Non-vehicular access shall be dedicated to the City for the tollowing streets: / .-/ - 5, Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&Rs or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map or prior to the issuance of Duilding permits, where no map is involved. ,L~--'~-~' 6,Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated ___/___j.__ or noted on the final map. 7. The final map shall cleady delineate a 1 O-foot minimum building restriction area on the ] neighboring lot adjoining the zero lot line wall and contain the lollowing language: 'l/We hereby dedicate to the City of Rancho Cucarnonga the rfght to prohiDit the construcficn of (residential) buildings (or other structures) within those areas designated on the map as building restr~cticn areas," A maintenance agreement shall also be granted from each lot to the adjacent lot through the CC&R's. · v/ 8. All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be qu itclaimed or delineated on ---/ / the final map. V/' 9, Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of-way / / shall be dedicated to the City wherever they encroach onto private property. v/ 10. Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right turn lanes, to provide a minimum / / of 7 feet measured from the face of curbs. ff curb adjacent sidewalk is used along the right turn lane, a parallel street tree maintenance easement shall be provided. 11. The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site property interests _..J / · necessary to construct the required public improvements, and if he/she should fail to do so the developer shall, at least 120 days prior to submittal of the final map for approval, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Governrn~nt Code Section 66462 at such time as the City acquires the property interests required forthe improvements. Such agreement shall provide for payment by the developer of all costs incurred by the City to acquire the off-site property interests required in connection with the subdivision. Secudty for a pertion of these costs shall be in the form of a CaSh deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the developer, at developer's cost. The appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal. M. Street Improvements 1. All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, .._.J 1 landscaped areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, I)ut are not limited to, curd and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. 2. A minimum of 26- feet wide pavement, within a 40 -foot wide dedicated right-of-way shall be / / .. constructed for all half-section streets. · // 3. Construct the following padmeter street improvements inckjding, but not limited to: / / sc - 2/9 z 9 or t2 _~:::~L~ .r/,-~/~/.r p~J~ ~,-o.: ./__-w~/~. 37 c,,~npte.o. D,,,: Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined dudng plan check. (c) If so marked, side- walk shall be curvilinear per STD. 304. (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item, v/4. Improvement plans and construction: a. Street improvement plans including street trees and street lights, prepared by a regis- / / tered Civil Engineer, shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Sq~unty shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or pdvate street improve- ments, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being parlormeal in public dgnt-of-way, fees shall be paid and a / /""'- construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineers Office in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, 'marking, traffic, street name signing, and interconnect conduit / / shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed on any new construction or reconstruction / / of major, secondary or coiledor streets which intersect with other m, ajor, secondary or collector streets for future traffic signals. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: / /' (1) All pull boxes shall be NO. 6 unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. (2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pullrope. / / e. Wheel chair ran'q~s shall be installed on all four comers of intersections par City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with / / . adequate detours during construction. A street closure permit may be required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon corrq)letlon of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewaks. Under sidewalk drains shall be . .-/ J installed to City Standards, except for single family lots. h. Handicap access ramp design shall be as specified by the City Engineer. i. Street names shall be approveq by the City Planner Prior to submitlal for first Plan chec'k' / / / 5. Street inXxovement plans per City Standards for all private streets shall be provided for review and approval by the City Engineer. Prior to any work being pedormed on the pri- vate streets, fees shall be paid and construction pannits shall be obtained from the City Engineers Office in addition to any other permits required. v/ 6. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger. shall be installed per City Standards in / / accordance with the City's street tree program. / 7. Inte~e~n line of site deserts shall be reviewed by me C~y E~ineer for conforman~ a~pted ~1~. a. On ~ll~or or larger ~reets, lines ol s~ shall ~ plo~ for all pmje~ intersections, i~iudi~ dr~eways. Walls, s~ns, a~ s~s shall ~ ~at~ outside the lines of sight. La~i~ a~ other obstm~ns w~hin the lines of sight s~all ~ ~pmved by the C~y Engineer. b. L~al res~emial ~reet ime~ns shall have their ~t~e~il~y improved, u~ally by moving the 2 +/- c~se st street trees on each s~e ~ay from the street a~ placed in a street tree ease~m. 8. A pe~ shall ~ o~ained from CALTRANS for any wo~ w~hin the lol~wing rigger-way: 9, All ~bljC impmveme~s on t~ IOI~Wj~ streets shall ~ o~rat~l~ ~mplele p~or to the issua~e Of buj~i~ ~rm~s: N. Public Maintenance Areas V/ 1. A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards / /- shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. The following landscape parkways, medians, ;:::::, ;;;;,7.,;;-.;;, ;;;,;:,-, ,,T~,.,~; ,;: -."~' are required to be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance District: / t/ 2, A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting _-/ / Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer priorto finel map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be berne by the developer. ~f' 3. All required public landscaping and irrigation systems shall be continuously maintained by the / / developer until accepted by the City. v'/ 4. Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective / / Beautifioation Master Ran: O. Drainage and Flood Control 1. The project (or portions thereef) is located within a Flood Hazard Zone; therefore, flood / protection measures shall be provided as cartflied by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer. 2. It shall be the developer's responsibility to have the current FIRM Zone / designation removed from the project area. 'The developers engineer shall prepare all necessary reports, plans, and hydrologic/hydraulic calculations. A Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) shall be obtained from FEMA prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. A Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) shall be issued by FEMA prior to occupancy or improvement acceptance, whichever occurs first. v/ 3. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final ---/ map approval or the issuance of buitding permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. CoTn~l~uon Da~.¢: 4. A pertnit from the Gounty Flood Control District is required for work wilhin its rigl~t-ol-way, /_.__/ ~ 5. Trees are prohibited wit!~in 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured from the outer edge ol a mature tree trunk. / / 6. Public storm drain easements shall be graded to convey overflows in the event of a / / blockage in a sump catch basin on the public street. P. Utilities v' 1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, / / gas, electric power, telephone, and cable 'IV (all under0round) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. · ,/ 2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. / / v/ 3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the / /.-- Cucarnonga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bemardino. A letter of compliance from the CCWD is required pdor to final map al~roval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Q. General Requirements and Approvals 1. The separate parcels contained within the project boundaries shall be legally combined into one parcel prior to issuance of building permits. 2. An easement for a joint use ddveway shall be provided prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first, for: 3. Prior to approval of the final map a deposit shall be posted with the City covedng the estimated cost of apportioning the assessments under Assessment District among the newly created parcels. 4. Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Regional Mainline, Secondary Regional, and Master Plan Drainage Fees shall be paid prior to final map approval or prior to building parrnit issuance ff no map is involved. V/5. Permits shall be obtained from the following agencies for work within their right-of-way: 6. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form trm Law Enforcement Community Facilities Distrk~ shall be fiie~ with the City Engineer pdor to final map al:groval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the Developer. 7. Prior to finalization of any development ptmse, surfWent improvement plans shall be corn- pieted beyond the phase boundades to assure secondary access and drainage protection to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Phase boundaries Shall correspond tO lot lines shown on the ap~roved lentatlve map. SC - 2/91 12of 12 RESOLUTION NO. 91-86A A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 90-37, A REQUEST TO AMEND CERTAIN CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED 60-ACRE COMMERCIAL RETAIL CENTER IN THE REGIONAL RELATED COMMERCIAL DESIGNATION (SUBAREA 4) OF THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BETWEEN 1-15 AND ETIWANDA AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 229-031-03 THROUGH 13, 15, 16, 20 AND A PORTION OF 59. A. Recitals. (i) On June 26, 1991, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted its. Resolution No. 91-86 thereby approving, subject to certain conditions, Conditional Use Permit 90-37. (ii) On August 21, 1991, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a public hearing on an appeal of Conditional Use Permit 90-37. After concluding the public hearing, the City Council reaffirmed the Planning Commission's approval, subject to one additional condition of approval, through adoption of its Resolution No. 91-248. (iii) On~ March 13, 1992, Foothill Marketplace Partners filed an application requesting modification to certain conditions of approval for Conditional Use Permit 90-37. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the Subject Conditional Use Permit modification is referred to as "the application." (iv) On March 25, 1992, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga approved the phasing plan for Conditional Use Permit 90-37. A copy of said plan is attached as Exhibit "A" and hereby incorporated by this reference. (v) On April 8, 1992, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. ? (vi) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 91-86A CUP 90-37 - FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE PARTNERS April 8, 1992 Page 2 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on April 8, 1992, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to a ~60 acre parcel of land located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard between 1-15 and Etiwanda Avenue, with a street frontage of ±2,175 feet along Foothill Boulevard and ±600 feet along Etiwanda Avenue. The site is presently designated for Regional Related Commercial and Light Industrial uses and is developed with single-family residences, a winery complex, and a converted gas station; and (b) The property to the north is designated for Commercial uses and is improved with a mix of uses including a church, single-family residences, retail stores, and a converted winery. The property to the south is designated for Industrial uses and is developed with an industrial business, is being developed with a water transmission facility, and is vacant. The property to the east is designated for commercial and Residential uses and is vacant and developed with single-family residences. The property to the west, opposite the 1-15 Freeway, is designated for Regional Commercial uses and is vacant; and (c) The project will comply with all minimum standards of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and (d) The development of a ±550,000 square foot retail/commercial center is consistent with the Regional Related Commercial designation of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan and the Commercial designation of the General Plan. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs i and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the proposed modification is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. (b) That the proposed modification, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. (c) That the proposed modification complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code and Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, the City Council issued a mitigated Negative Declaration on August 21, 1991. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 91-86A CUP 90-37 - FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE PARTNERS April 8, 1992 Page 3 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planninq Division 1) Approval of the Conditional Use Permit is for the conceptual master plan for the entire shopping center and the detailed site plan and elevations for Price Club. All other buildings and/or pads will require the approval of a separate Development Review or Conditional Use Permit application, as required by the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading or building permits, a Tree Removal Permit application shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner. An arborist's report shall be prepared to address the possible preservation and/or relocation of heritage trees on-site. The arborist shall be selected by the City and paid for by the developer. 3) No occupancy shall be permitted for any user until all street improvements have been installed to the satisfaction of the City. 4) If phasing is proposed, the phasing plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission prior to the issuance of any building permits for the center. 5) No permanent Outdoor storage of shopping carts shall be permitted, unless otherwise approved by the Planning Commission- 6) Parking lots along Foothill Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue shall be fully screened from the street through the use of ±3-foot berms, low screen walls, and/or shrub planting. The final details shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. 7) A Uniform Sign Program shall be prepared for the center and shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission prior to the issuance of any building permits within phases PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 91-86A CUP 90-37 - FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE PARTNERS April 8, 1992 Page 4 subsequent to Phasa 1. The program shall consist of all on-site signage including, but not limited to, monument signs, directional signs, and wall signs. 8) All future pads shall be seeded and irrigated for erosion control prior to occupancy of any building. Details shall be included with the landscape and irrigation plans. The plans shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Planner prior to the issuance of any building permits for the center. 9) All street furniture, including benches, bike racks, potted plants, light bollards and standards, drinking fountains, trash receptacles, etc., shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission prior to the issuance of any building permits within phases subsequent to Phase 1. 10) Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours. 11) The entire site shall be kept free from trash and debris at all times and, in no event, shall trash and debris remain for more than 24 hours. 12) There shall be provision for security patrol of the shopping center at least three times per evening, seven days per week, between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. by a licensed private patrol. 13) Bus shelters on Etiwanda Avenue and on Foothill Boulevard shall be installed with street improvements and shall be architecturally. compatible to the center. Final location and design of the bus shelters shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of any building permits for the center. 14) Any transformers, service areas, or trash enclosures located near the setbacks of Etiwanda Avenue and Foothill Boulevard shall only be considered when they are screened by using a combination of walls, berms, and landscaping. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 91-86A CUP 90-37 - FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE PARTNERS April 8, 1992 Page 5 15) The freeway right-of-way adjacent to the project shall be landscaped, or an in-lieu fee paid, in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No. 87-185. The landscape plans shall be approved by the City Planner or the in-lieu fee shall be paid prior to the issuance of any building permits for the center. 16) Specimen size trees (36-inch box or larger) shall be provided at key locations including, but not limited to, entries, plazas, on-site intersections, etc. The type and location of the trees shall be shown on the final landscape plans for each phase which shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of any building permits for that phase. 17) Any outdoor rending machines shall be architecturally integrated into the design of the buildings- The vending machines shall not extend out into the pedestrian walkways. A Recycling Permit application shall be submitted for any recycling center and shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of any building permits for the center. 18) Trash enclosures shall be designed to incorporate the following design features to the satisfaction of the City Planner: a) Architecturally integrated into the design of the shopping center. b) Separate pedestrian -access, including a self-closing door, that does not require opening of the main doors. c) Roll-up doors. d) Trash bins with counter-weighted lids. e) Architecturally integrated overhead trellis. f) Chain link screen on top of the enclosure to prevent trash from blowing out of the enclosure. The chain link shall be hidden from view. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 91-86A CUP 90-37 - FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE PARTNERS April 8, 1992 Page 6 19) The applicant shall make a good-faith effort to obtain permission to grade onto adjacent properties in order to eliminate the need for retaining walls along the south property line. Such evidence shall be presented to the City Planner prior to the issuance of grading permits. 20) If permission to grade off-site cannot be obtained, landscape plans for Metropolitan Water District shall be reviewed to determine the practicality of installing wrought iron fencing on top of the retaining wall in order to minimize the impact of the solid wall. The plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of any building permits within phases subsequent to Phase 1. The retaining wall, however, shall be designed to accommodate a block wall on top in the event the wrought iron is determined by the City Planner to be impractical. 21) The applicant shall submit architectural plans, colors, and details to further define the architectural vocabulary expected for the center. The information (including the final colors and verification of all roof-mounted equipment for Price Club) shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission prior to the issuance of any building permits within phases subsequent to Phase 1. 22) A plan of development for on-site amenities shall be established to "tie" the site together through pedestrian-scale linkages. Elements to consider include, but are not limited to, hardscape treatment and patterns, landscaping, trellises, kiosks, street furniture, seating area, plazas, building features, signage, etc. The final plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission prior to the issuance of any building permits within phases subsequent to Phase 1. 23) The final design of any retaining wall along the freeway off-ramp shall be reviewed and approved by the Design Review Committee prior to issuance of building permits for the walls. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 91-86A CUP 90-37 - FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE PARTNERS April 8, 1992 Page 7 24) Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided at a rate equal to 5 percent of the required automobile parking stalls, up to a maximum of 100 bicycle storage spaces. Security racks shall be provided for each storage space and shall be located near main building entrances in highly visible areas to minimize theft and vandalism. An aisle or other space shall be provided for bicycles to enter and leave the storage spaces with a minimum width of 5 feet to the front or rear of a standard 6-foot bicycle parked in the space. Historic Preservation 1) The, applicant shall underwrite the cost of not more than six interviews as part of a City approved Oral History Program of the pioneer wine-making families of the subject area. A deposit to cover the cost of the interviews shall be submitted to the City prior to the issuance of any building permits for the center. 2) The existing structures shall be documented fully according to HABS/HAER standards by an architect approved by the City and paid for by the applicant. The documents shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Planner prior to the issuance of permits for either demolition or relocation. 3) The applicant shall offer to donate the Guidera and DiCarlo homes to persons demonstrating ownership of a parcel within the City of Rancho Cucamonga suitable for such relocation- These homes shall be available for such donation over a period of 180 days and the applicant shall pay for relocation costs to the point of delivery of the houses to the lots, with the foundations for the homes to be completed by others. Advertisements shall be placed in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin and The Sun newspapers, at a minimum, every weekend during the 180-day period. The size of the advertisement shall be one-eighth page and the content shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the submittal to the newspapers. Parcels located in the historic community of Etiwanda will be given first preference. All documentation demonstrating k PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 91-86A CUP 90-37 - FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE PARTNERS April 8, 1992 Page 8 compliance with this condition shall be submitted to the City Planner prior to the issuance of demolition or grading permits. 4) The applicant shall incorporate the familial and architectural past of the area into commissioned public art integral to the architectural design of the project. This artwork shall portray southern Etiwanda's wine- making past in a realistic style and the applicant will submit no less than three alternatives, in no less than three different artistic mediums, for the Historical Preservation Commission's review. The final specifications for this architecturally integrated artwork shall be approved by the Planning Commission prior to accepting any future project application as complete. 5) The applicant shall use personal names and those of associative qualities, such as winery names or wine labels, on the project site wherever possible and appropriate with the approval of the center's Uniform Sign Program. 6) No demolition permits shall be issued for existing structures within the project site until the issuance of grading permits. 7) The project applicant shall contribute up to $100,000.00 to establish a fund for the reconstruction of a 2,000 square foot barn at the site of the City-owned Chaffey/Garcia house wherein local wine industry artifacts will be documented and displayed. Said funds shall be donated prior to the issuance of demolition permits. The design of the structure shall follow the design of the original Chaffey/Garcia barn and its execution shall be subject to review and approval of the Historic Preservation Commission in the form of a Landmark Alteration Permit. Enqineerinq Division 1) Existing Overhead Utilities PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 91-86A CUP 90-37 - FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE PARTNERS April 8, 1992 Page 9 a) Foothill Boulevard - An in-lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (telecommunication and electrical) on the opposite side of Foothill Boulevard shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of building permits. The fee shall be one-half of the City adopted unit amount times the length from the center of Etiwanda Avenue to the westerly terminus. b) Etiwanda Avenue - An in-lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (electrical except for the 66 kv , electrical) on the opposite side of Etiwanda Avenue shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of building permits. The fee shall be one-half the City adopted unit amount times the length from the center of Foothill Boulevard to the south project boundary- c) Overhead utility service lines which cross Foothill Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue shall be removed concurrently with the removal of the existing houses on the south side of Foothill Boulevard- 2) Foothill Boulevard shall be constructed from Etiwanda Avenue to the westerly project boundary as follows: a) Full width on the south side including the median curb. b) The ultimate backbone system on the north side consisting of two travel lanes (27-foot wide pavement) and the median curb or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. c) Landscape the median island. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover the cost of one-half width of landscaping fronting his project from future development of across-the- street properties. d) Construct a complete intersection of Etiwanda Avenue and Foothill Boulevard with transitions to meet existing pavement PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 91-86A CUP 90-37 - FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE PARTNERS April 8, 1992 Page 10 east on Foothill Boulevard and north on Etiwanda Avenue. Also, the traffic signals shall be modified at the intersection of Etiwanda Avenue and Foothill Boulevard. Both items shall be as approved by the City Engineer. If improvement of the intersection requires alterations to the existing building(s) at the Foothill Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue intersection, the structure(s) shall be reviewed for their historical significance by the Historic Preservation Commission and Planning Commission and appropriate mitigation measures established. The developer may request a reimbursement . agreement to recover the cost of the mitigation measures associated with the intersection improvements from future development as it occurs on the affected properties. e) The developer shall be eligible for fee credits against, and reimbursement from, the Transportation Development Fee for the portion of improvements determined by the City Engineer to be of supplemental size, length, or capacity over that needed or the impact of this development in conformance with Ordinance No. 455. 3) The traffic signal shall be installed at the main entrance on Foothill Boulevard at the developer's expense. 4) The median island within Foothill Boulevard shall be moved southerly so that it is symmetrical about the centerline or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 5) The Foothill Boulevard bus bay shall be moved westerly to be as close as possible to the median opening to reduce potential jaywalking across Foothill Boulevard. 6) Etiwanda Avenue shall be widened on both sides as necessary to accommodate the street improvements necessary to mitigate the traffic impacts of the project as required by the City Engineer. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 91-86A CUP 90-37 - FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE PARTNERS April 8, 1992 Page 11 7) Provide double (opposite direction) left turn lanes within Etiwanda Avenue to serve the project entrances, Chestnut Avenue, and a future driveway on the east side of Etiwanda Avenue, or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 8) Provide a curb-adjacent sidewalk for the bus bay on Foothill Boulevard. Also, the curb- adjacent sidewalk for the bus bay on Etiwanda Avenue shall be minimized. 9) Provide a meandering sidewalk in accordance with City Standard No. 304 on Etiwanda Avenue. The sidewalk on Foothill Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue shall meet all driveways at the zero face of the curb return except for the main entrance on Foothill Boulevard and as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 10) A final traffic study showing calculations for the determination of the length of all left turn lanes on Foothill Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue based on post 2010 traffic conditions shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. All street facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. 11) A lot line adjustment shall be recorded to incorporate the northerly. portion of APN: 229-021-59 and the westerly portion of APN: 229-031-16 into this project prior to the issuance of building permits. 12) All of the project driveways and the internal drive aisles to be used by trucks shall be designed to accommodate the Caltrans standard 50-foot radius turn template unless justification is provided for a lesser design . radius as approved by the City Engineer. 13) The property necessary for the proposed freeway off-ramp at the northwest corner of the site shall be reserved. It appears that Caltrans will not allow the retaining wall shown on the plans; therefore, additional land to what is shown on. the plans will need to be reserved as approved by Caltrans and the City Engineer. Also, the project plans will need to be modified accordingly. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 91-86A CUP 90-37 - FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE PARTNERS April 8, 1992 Page 12 14) Drainage fees for the development shall be paid as follows: a) Etiwanda/San Sevaine area fees for the portion of the site within that area boundary (easterly.6± acres). b) General City area fees for the portion of this site outside of the Etiwanda/San Sevaine area. c) A payment equivalent to the Day Creek Mello-Roos Assessment of $4,675 per acre for the portion of the site currently outside the Day Creek channel Mello-Roos .= District boundary. 15) Approval shall be obtained from the Municipal Water District and San Bernardino County Flood Control District to accept the existing flows from north of Foothill Boulevard to the facility along Arrow Highway and Day Creek Channel. If such approvals cannot be obtained, alternate facilities such as those required by the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Drainage Policy (Area 9) shall be provided as approved by the City Engineer. 16) Intersection drains shall be provided across Foothill Boulevard at Etiwanda Avenue sized to convey as much flow as feasible as approved by the City Engineer. 17) Drainage facilities shall be extended to the north side of Foothill Boulevard along the project frontage to collect as much flow as feasible as approved by the City Engineer. 18) Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance for disposal of the drainage entering the property from the adjacent Calftans area to the west. 19) The small portion of the southeast corner of the property shall be regraded to drain to the Municipal Water District Facility. 20) Construct storm drain facilities to serve the site generally as shown on the plans and as described in the project's preliminary drainage PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 91-86A CUP 90-37 - FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE PARTNERS April 8, 1992 Page 13 report subject to final plan check and a final drainage report as approved by the City Engineer. 21) Easements for and permission to construct storm drain facilities on and convey flows to off- site properties shall be obtained and provided as approved by the City Engineer. 22) Easements for public storm drains within the site shall be provided. 23) The developer and the City shall enter into an agreement that transfers maintenance responsibilities from the City to the developer for.the drainage facilities serving Foothill Boulevard at such time that alternate facilities for disposing of the Foothill Boulevard drainage is provided and approved by the City Attorney and City Engineer. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF APRIL 1992 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of April 1992, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS SUBJECT: ./Z~L~/r~>/.L/~,~r~'./~2~,~ ~. APPLICANT: ,~:L/~Z,Z/,~ -~r/~??/Z,~-~.~, ,~~3 LOCATION: ~ ~~ZZ ~7~ /;~ ~' ~~~ ,- ,,~r-- // ~ose item c~ .am ~m of ~v~. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DNISION, (714) 989-1861, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A, TIme Limits - ~natea. i;~ %/ 1. ApFoval shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, if building permits are / / not issued or approved use has not commenced within 24 months from the date of approval. 2. Developrnent/Design Review shag be approved prior to / / . / / 3, Approval of Temative Tract No, is granted subject to the approval of /.-.-J - v/ 4. The deveioper shallcomrnence, participate in, and consummate orcause to be comrnenced / / ' participated in, or consummated, a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District (CFD) for the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District to finance construction and/or maintenance of a fire station to serve the development. The station shall be located, designed, and built to all specifications of the Rancho Cuc, amonga Fire Protection District, and shall become the Districts property upon completion. The equipment shall be selected by the District in accordance with its needs. In any building of a station, the developer shall cornply with all applicable laws and regulations. The CFD shall be formed by the District and the developer by the time recordation of the final map occurs. 5. Prior to recordation of the final map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes / / first, the applicant shall consent to, or participate in, the establishment of a Melk>-Roos Community Facilities District for the construction and maintenance of necessary school facilities. However, ff any school distrk:t has previously established such a Community Fadlities District, the applicant shall, in the alternative, consent to the annexation of the project site into the territory of such existing District prior to the recordation of the final map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes firm. Further, if the affected school district has not fo.rmed a Melio-Roos Community Facilities District within tweive months from the date of approval of the project and prior to the recordaticn of the final map or issuance of building permits for said project, this condition shall be deemed null and void. sc - 2/91 t or t2 Co,,_dcd~ This condition shall be waived if the City receives notice that the applicant and all affected school districts have entered into an agreement to privately accommodate any and all school impacts as a remit of this project. v/ 6. Prior to mcordation of the final map or prior to issuance of building permits when no map is _...J ../ involved, written certification from the affected water district that adequate sewer and water facilities are or will be available to serve the proposed project shall be submitted to the Departmere of Community Development. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prio rto issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects'. B, SIte Development v/ 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which J / include site plans, architectural elevations, extedor materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Developmere Code regulations, and ~/Tj/zz' ,~',:- ~. Specific Plan and Planned Community. v/ 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all .J / Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. v/ 3. OccupancyofthefadlityshallnotcomrnenceuntilsuchtirneasallUnfformBuildingCodeand / / . State Fire Marshall's regulations have been cornplied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division to show compliance. The building shall be inspected for compliance pdor to v/ 4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be / / submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. v/ 5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street imlxovement plans shall be coordinated for / / ..... consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.), or pdor to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. v/ 6.. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development / /----- Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community Plans or Specific Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. v/ 7. A detailed on-site lighting plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner and J / Sher~f's Department (989-6611 ) prior to the issuance of building perttits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding So as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. 8. Ifnccentrafizedtrashreceptadesarepmvided, alltrashplck'uPshafl be for indivldual units / / with all receptacles shielded from public view. v/ 9. Trash receptacle(s) are required and shell meet City standards. The final design, locations, / / and the number of trash receptacles shall be sul~ect to City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. '/ 10. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall --.J J- be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City P,a..er. f SC - 2/91 2 of 12 11. Street names shall ~ suUm~ for ~Ry Planner review a~ ~val in a~ma~e wRh t~ a~ ~ree~ Nami~ ~l~y p~r ~o ~mval o~ 1he final ~. / 12. All ~i~i~ ~m~m a~ i~iv~ual unRs shall ~ ~entffi~ in a clear a~ ~ise manner, i~di~ pm~r illuminatbn. 13. A detailed ~an ind~ti~ trail w~ths, ~i~m s~pes, phys~al m~ns, fendS, a~ J J we~ ~mml, in a~a~e w~h C~ Ma~er Trail d~in~, shall ~ ~bmi~ lor C~y Planner m~ a~ a~mval p~rto ~pmval a~ m~albn of the Final Tra~ Map a~ p~r D ;royal of street improveram a~ grMi~ ~ans. Deve~r shall u~rade a~ all trails, i~ding fe~i~ and dmina~ dev~s, in ~n~n w~h street improvements. 14. The ~venan~, ~bns a~ Re~ns (CC&Rs) sMII ~t ~hb~ t~ keepi~ of ~uine / ...J ani~ls where zoni~ r~uim~ms br the kee~ of ~ ani~ls have been met. I~i~dual bt ownera in su~ns ~all have the o~bn ol kee~ s~ anima~ w~ the ~ess~y of ~aling to ~a~s of dir~ors or ~m~wnem' ~bns for a~nd~ms to the CC&Rs. 15. ~e ~vena~s, ~Bions, a~ Re~bns (CG&Rs) a~ Articles of Invitation of the ./ / Hornets' As~iabn am subj~ to ~ ~val of t~ Planni~ a~ E~ineeri~ D~isbns and t~ C~ A~b~y. They shall ~ r~ ~n~ffemly wHh the Rnal M~ or p~r to t~ ~sua~e of ~i~i~ ~s, whoever ~m timt. A r~ ~Y shall ~ pmv~ed to t~ C~ Enginer. 16. Nl~ays, o~namas, a~land~s~ll N~~m~mimain~ bythepmpe~ / / ~r, ho~nem' as~iabn, or ot~r ma~ a~~ to I~ C~. P~I of this land~ maimena~e shall ~ ~bm~ br C~ Plan~r a~ C~ E~ineer rev~w a~ ~mval p~r to issuan~ of bui~i~ ~. 17. ~lar ~ess easerams s~l ~ d~ lot tN ~a of a~uming that each lot or / / ~elli~ unil shall have the ~ to r~e~e ~nl~M ~m~ ~m ~ts or un~s for use of a ~lar ene~ system. ~e e~em~s my N ~NaiMd in a ~irabn of Rest~bns for t~ su~ivis~n wh~h shall N m~ ~~ ~ ~ r~tbn of t~ linal m~ or is~a~ of ~s, whoever ~s fi~. ~ e~m~s shall ;hbH the ~ing of sh~s by v~n, ~ures, f~r~ or a~ o~r ~, ex~ lor ~il~ wires a~ simi~r ~s, ~uam ~ ~ve~m ~ ~n 17.~ .06~2. 18.The ~ ~mai~ a ~s~ Hi~o~l ~m~. ~ see sMII ~ deve~ a~ ~imai~d in ~a~ ~h tM Hi~o~ ~M~ Me~bn Pe~ ~. . Any fu~Nr ~~ to tM she i~i~, ~ ~l lim~ to, e~e~r a~erat~ a~or i~e~r a~erat~ ~h ~ t~ e~e~r of tM ~i~i~ or ~ums, m~v~ of ~ma~ trees, ~l~bn, ~bn, r~m~n of ~i~i~ or ~m~ures, or cM~es to t~ s~e, shall reim a ~~n ~ ~ H~to~ ~~ Merabn Pe~ ~bj~ to Histo~c PmseN~ Co~bn ~ a~ ~val. C. Building ~lgn 1. An a~emat~e e~ sy~em · r~imd to ~v~ ~m~ ~t water lor all ~elli~ un~s J / aM for ~ati~ a~ ~im~ ~1 or ~, un~ss otNr a~e~ive e~ sy~ems are detonated to N ~ ei~N ~ a~ eff~. NI ~im~ ~B in~ai~ at the time of in~ial deve~ sMII ~ ~~m~ w~ ~ir heati~. ~tails shall i~d~ in t~ ~i~i~ ~am a~ shall N sum~ tot C~y Planner rev~ aM ~roval p~r to I~ issua~e of ~i~ing ~s. 2. All ~elli~s shall have t~ front, s~e aM rear e~vat~ns u~ra~ w~h archit~tural / tinatom, detaili~ a~ imreas~ deli~at~n of suff~ tre~mm ~ to G~ Planner revi~ a~ ~mval p~r to Bsua~ ot ~i~i~ ~s. ~ - 2/9] 3 or 12 Proicct ,No.: :'~,'? Com_de.~ D=,-: 3. Standard patio cover plans for use by the Homeowners' Association shall be submitted for / / City Planner and Building Official review and approval prior to issuance of building perTnits. v/ 4. All roof appurtenances, including air conditionere and other roof mounted equipment and/or / -/ projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Division. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Details shall be included in building plans. D. Parking and Vehicular Access (Indicate delalls on building plans) v/ 1. All perking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall / / contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curb). v/ 2. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured.pavement across circulation aisles shall be / / provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/ plazas/recreational uses. '/:: 3. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, __/ / entrances, and exits shal!. be stdped per City standards. 4. All units shall be provided with garage door openers if driveways are less than 18 feet in / / . depth from back of sidewalk. 5. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions shall restdct the storage of recreational vehicles / / on this site unless they are the principal source of transportation for the owner and prohibit parking on interior circulation aisles other than in designated visitor parking areas. 6. Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the City Planner, City Engineer, and / /-- Rancho Cucarnonga Fire Protection District review and approval priorto issuance of building permits. E. Landscaping (for publicly maintained landscape arm, refer to Section N.) v/ 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscap- / / ing in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed lardscape architect and submitted for City Ranner review and approval priorto the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. v/ 2. Existingtmesrequiredt~bepreserved~np~acesha~~hepr~tectedwithac~nstructionbarrier / / in accordance with the Municipal Code Section 19.08.110, and so noted on the grading plans. The location of these trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall he shown on the detailed landscape plans, The applicant shall follow all of the arbodsrs recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting and trimming methods. 3. Aminirnumof treespergrossacre,cornprisedofthefollowingsizes, shall be Provided / J ' within the project: % - 48- inch box or larger, % o 36- inch box or larger, __ % - 24- inch box or larger, % - 15-gallon, and .. % - 5 gallon. v/ 4. A minimum of ~-~' % of trees planted within the project shall be specimen size trees - / /'- 24-inch box or larger. ,// 5. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three / ./_ parking stalls, sufficient to shade 50% of the parking area at solar noon on August 21. SC - 2/91 4 of 12 com~cuon 8. TrHs shall ~ pla~ in areas o( publ~ ~ adjace~ 1o a~ abng st~uFe8 at a ~ate o( one ?. All p~o 8b~ ~s ~ tBol or ~s in v~l ~ ~ a~ o( S:l or gmat~ r sb~, b~ me~ ~:l B), Bhall N, ~ minimum, i~al~ a~ land~ ~h ~mpHala gmu~ ~vm 1o~ emabn ~ml. So~ plami~ r~uir~ by Ibis s~bn 8hall i~luUe a p~na~ sy~em to ~ i~al~ by the deveb~r p~r to ~n~. 8. Aiip~tes~sinexcessof5fet, butlessthan8 feet inve~alhe~Mandof2:l orgre~er / / s~ shall ~ la~d a~ iffigat~ for ems~n ~mml a~ to ~en their a~ara~ as fol~: one 15~al~n or la~er s~e tree ~r e~h 1 ~ ~. ~. of s~ area, 1 ~al~n or la~er s~e shNb ~r each 100 ~. ~. of s~ area, ~ ~m~e gmu~ ~ver. In a~n, s~ ~n~ in ex~ss of 8 feet in ve~l heigM a~ of 2:1 or greier s~ shall al~ i~lude one 5~al~n or la~er s~e tree ~r each ~0 ~. ft. of s~ area. Tree aM shN~ shall p~ in ~a~emd c~em to ~en a~ vaW s~ Nne. SIo~ ~aNi~ r~uir~ by this s~ion eMIl i~ude a ~anem i~at~n sy~em to ~ in~all~ by t~ deve~r p~r to 9. For siam fa~ res~eNial deve~pm~, all s~ ~mi~ a~ i~bn s~ll ~ ~minu- / / ous~ miNain~ in a hea~hy a~ thdvi~ ~n ~ t~ ~ve~r umil e~h i~i~dual un~ ~ ~ a~pld byt~ ~yer. Pmrto mlui~ o~pa~for~ un~s, an i~n shall ~ ~~ by the Ranning D~i~n to ~te~ t~ t~y ~e in sli~a~o~ 10. For m~fami~ res~e~ial and mn-res~emil devemN, pm~ ~m are re~n- / / sble for t~ ~minual mimena~e of il la~~ areas o~s~e, B well as ~m~ous pla~ areas w~hin ~e ~ ~ffi~f-way. All la~ are~ s~ll N ke~ free from we~s a~ ~ a~ ~i~i~ in a hea~ a~ th~ ~n, a~ s~ll r~e r~lar ~ning, feffil~i~, ~i~, a~ ~mmi~. ~ ~d, ~, d~e~, or d~ying plm mtedal sh~l N r~ wffiin 30 ~ys from t~ ~e of ~e. 11. Front yaffi la~~ s~ll N rlir~ ~r tM ~ve~m ~ ~/or / / . ~is r~im~N eMIl ~ in ~n to t~ r~uir~ ~met ~ees a~ s~ ~ami~. 12. ~e fin~ ~s~n of t~ ~d~ter ~ays, wal~, ~~~, a~ s~al~ shall ~ / / i~ in ~ rli~ i~ Nns ~ s~ M ~ to C~ P~r rev~ a~ ~val aM ~ffiim~ ~r ~e~ w~h a~ H~ay IM~i~ Nn wh~ my r~i~ by tM E~i~ DN~n. 13. ~il i~m leamr. ~ ~ ~~, alluv~ ~, ~mn s~e trees, meaMer- ~ J i~ s/wa~ (~ ~~ ~e), aM ~e~ m~, i rlir~ a~ 14. La~i~i~nsyme~m~lr~toNi~wffiintN~ ~M~f-wayon tN ~d~er ~ thi pm~ area eMIl N ~mi~us~ mi~ ~ tM deve~r. 15. All wallssMIINpm~wRh~rmi~tmmmm- ff~ in~bl~mimena~eamas / ./ t~ ~s~n eMIl N ~ffiint~ w~ t~ E~i~d~ DW~n. 16. Tr~ ~imena~ ~e~ s~ll ~ de~ a~ ~~ for C~ P~n~r rev~ a~ / / ;~1 ~r to ~ame of ~i~i~ ~s. ~ c~e~a eMIl e~rage ~e Mtural g~h ~ar~ed~ of the sel~ tree ~is. 17.La~i~ aM iqa~n ~all N ~s;n~ to ~n~we water thr~gh the pd~iples of Xe~ as defi~ in C~er 19.16 of ~ Ran~ Cu~m~a Mun~l ~. F. Signs '/' 1. ThesignsindicatedonthesubmittedplansareconceptualonlYandnotaPartof thisapproval. / Any signs proposed forthis development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation of any signs. /~.,~,v',,v"j / 2. AUniformSignprogramforthisdevelopmentshallbesubmittedfor~";;atY:g4aaaer reviewand / / approval prior to issuance of building perrnits,.~.:~ ,47/,',Y ;-'7-~3=-~ ,..~'_~Fr.~/E,,,~r-~'C 3. DireCtory monument sign(s) shell be provided for apartment, condominium, or townhomes / / prior to occupancy and shall require separate application and approval by the Pinning Division prior to issuance ol building permits. G. Environmental 1. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Fourth Street Rock / / Crusher project in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 2. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice ol the City Adopted ..J /.- Special Studies Zone for the Red Hill Fault, in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 3. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Foothill Freeway / / ... project in a standard format as determined by the City Piannsr, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 4. A final acoustical report shell be submitted for City Planner review and approval pdor to the / /__ issuance of building permits. The final report shell discuss the level ot intedor noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and construction techniques provided, and if appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures. The building plans will be checked for conformante with the mitigation measures contained in the final report. H. Other Agen¢ie~ v/ 1. ErnergencysecondaryaccessshellbepmvidedinaccordancewithRanchoCucam°ngaFire '''/ / Protection District Standards. ~"': 2. Emergencyaccessshellbeprovlded, rnalntenance free and clear, a minimumof26Ieetwlde / / at all times dudng construction in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District requirements. v/ 3. Prior to issuance of building permits for combustible construction, evidence shell be submitted to the Ramhe Cucamonga Fire Protection District that temporan/water supply lot fire protection is available, pending completion of required life protection system. v/ 4. The applicant shell contact the U. S. Postal Service to cletermins the appropriate type and / -/ location of mail boxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead slructure for mail boxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mail boxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits=- 5. For projects using septic tank facilities, written certification of acceptability, including all / /- supportive information, shell be obtained from the San Bernardino County Department of Envimnmenfal Health and submitted to the Building Official prior to the issuance of Septic Tank Permits, and prior to issuance of building permits. SC - 2/91 6 of 12 ~-,-,,~2 APPLICANTS SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (714) 989-1863, FOR '~,OMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: I. SIte DevelopmeN v/ 1. The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechani- cal Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the tim of issuance of miative permits. Please cornact the Building and Safety Division for copies of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential dwelling unit(s) or major addition / / to existing unit(s), the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but am not limited to: City Beaut~ication Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Systems Deveioprnent Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fees. v/ 3. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development or / / addition to an existing deveioprnent, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: Systems Development Fee, Drainage Fee, School Fees, Permit and Plan Checking Fees. "// 4. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building Official, after tract/parcel map recordation and prior to issuance of building permits. J. Existing Structures 1. Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code for the property line clearances / / considering use, area, and fire-resisliveness of existing buildings. 2. Existing buildings shall be made to comply with correct building and zoning regulations for / /--- the intended use or the building shall be demolished. v/ 3. Existing sewage disposal fadlitles shall be removed, filled and/or capped to cornply with the l-----J Uniform Plumbing Code and Uniform Building Code. 'v/ 4. Underground on-site utilities are to be located and shown on building plans submitted for / · building permit application. K. Grading v/ 1. Grading of the subiect prol~rty shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City / / Grading Standards, 'and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. '/ 2. A soils report shah be prepared by a qualified engirmer licensed by the State of Califomia to ---/ / . perform such work. v/ 3. The development is located within the soil erosion control boundaries; a Soil Disturbance / / Permit is required. Pieare contact San Bernarclino County Department of Agriculture at (714) 387-2111 for permit application. Documentation of such permit shall be submitted to the City prior to the issuance of rough grading permit. 4.A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at ----/ / the time of application for grading plan check. v/' 5. Thefina~gradingpianssha~~becomp~etedandappr~vedpri~rt~issuance~fbuildingpermifs. / sc - 2/9t 7 or t2 pjo~ 6. ~ a ~mo~bt su~isbn, the followi~ r~immms shall ~ met: a. SureW shall be ~m~ a~ an agreerant ex~t~ guarameei~ ~letbn of all on-s~e J / dmina~ facilffies n~essaW for dewmed~ all ~rcels to the smisfa~n of the Bui~i~ a~ SafeW Div~bn p~rto final ~ ~mval a~ ~rto the issua~e of gmdi~ pe~s. b. ~pm~me easemems for safe dis~sal of dmi~ge wmer thm am ~u~ omo / / or over ad~m par~ls, am to ~ delinem~ a~ r~ to t~ smlsfm~n of the Bui~i~ a~ Safe~ D~bn p~r to ima~ of gradi~ a~ ~i~i~ pe~ts. c. On-site dmi~ge i~mvemms, n~essaW for d~medng a~ ~t~i~ the su~N~ ~ / pm~dis, am to ~ inmall~ pdor to isa~ of ~iMi~ ~ for ~nmm~bn u~n any ~mel that may ~ su~ to dmi~ge'f~s emed~, lavi~, or w~hin a pamel mirage to which a ~i~i~ ~ ~ r~em~. d. Fill gmdi~ ~ans for e~h ~1 am to ~ sub~ to the ~i~i~ and SafeW / D~ls~n for ~mval p~r to issua~e of ~i~i~ aN gr~i~ ~m. (~is my be on an i~mmmal or ~s~e ~sis.) e. All s~ ~nks in excess of 5 feet in refill ~ s~ll ~ ~ wRh nmi~ grosses / / or ~am~ w~h gmu~ver for ems~n ~mml u~n ~t~n of gradi~ or ~me other a~e~e mt~ of ems~n ~mml ~1 ~ ~t~ to ~e smi~m~n of the ~i~i~ ~ial. In a~ion a ~a~m i~n symem ~il N mv~. ~is r~iremem ~s ~t m~e the ~l~~r from ~ia~ w~h t~ s~e plami~ r~immms of S~n 17.~.0~ I of t~ Devemm ~e. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DNISION, (714) 989-1862, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: L Dedication and Vehicular Access 1. Rights-of-way and easements shaft be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets, / / community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. Private easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc.) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. t// 2. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets / ../ (measured trom street centedine): total feet on total feet on 3. An irrevocable offer of dedication for -foot wide roadway easement shall be made / / for all private streets or drives. 4. Non-vehicular access shall be dedicated to the City for the following streets: /---J- t/ 5. Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensudng access to all parcels by CC&Rs / ./ or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map or prior to the issuance of building permits, where no map ls invoived8 /_,,_ ~) of 12 SC - 2/91 ,,~,~/z~ 6.Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated __/ or noted on the final map. 7. The final map shall clearly delineate a I O-foot minimum building restriction area on the / / - neighboring lot adjoining the zero lot line wall and contain the following language: 'l/We hereby dedicate to the City of Rancho Cucamonga the right to prohibit the · construction of (residential) buildings (or other structures) within those areas designated on the map as 13uiiding restriction areas." A maintenance agreement shall also be granted from each lot to the adjacent lot through the CC&R's. v// 8. All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be quitclaimed or delineated on / / the final map. v/ 9. Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of-way _._J / shall be dedicated to the City wherever they encroach onto private property. v/ 10. Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right turn lanes, to provide a minimum / / ... of 7 feet measured from the face of curbs. If curo adjacent sidewalk is used along the right turn lane. a parallel street tree maintenance easement shall be provided. 11. The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site property interests / / necessary to construct the required public improvements, and if he/she should fail to do so, the developer shall, at least 120 days prior to submittal of the final map for approval, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Government Code Section 66462 at such tim as the City acquires the property interests required for the improvements. Such agreement shall provide for payment by the developer of all costs incurred by the City to acquire the off-site property interests required in connection with the subdivision. Secudty for a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the developer, at developer's cost. The appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal. M. Street Improvements 1. All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, _._J / landscaped area, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, ~ are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewats, street lights, and street trees. 2. A minimum of 26- foot wide pavement, within a 40 -foot wide dedicated right-of-way shall be / · . constructed for all haft-section streets. v/ 3. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: J J com_deuo. D.=: Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement reconstruction and ovedays will be determined dudng plan check. (c) If so marked, side- walk shall be curvilinear per STD. 304. (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item. v/ 4. Improvement plans and construction: a. Street improvement plans including street trees and street lights, prepared by a regis- / / feted Civil Engineer, shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guamnteeing completion of the public and/or private street improve- merits, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being pedormed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a / .J construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineers Office in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic, street name signing, and interconnect conduit / / shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signalconduitwithpullboxesshallbeinstailedonanynewconstructionorreconstruction / / of major, secondary or collector streets which intersect with other major, secondary or collector streets for Mum traffic signals. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: 'J /' (1) All pull boxes shall be No. 6 unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. (2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pullrope. / / e. Wheel chair ramps shall be installed on all four comers of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads recluidng construction shall mrnain open to traffic at all times with / / adequate detours cludng construction. A street closure permit may be required. A cash delDoSit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which Shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewats. Under sidewalk drains shall be / / . installed to City Standards, except for single family lots. h. Handicap access ramp design shall be as spedfled by the City Engineer. / ,../ i. StreetnamesshallbeappmvedbytheCitYPlannerixiortosubmittaiforfirstPlancheck' / / 5. Street irnlyovemeht plans per City Standards for all private streets shall be provided for ./ / review and approval by the City Engineer. Prior to any work being pedormed on the pri- vate streets, fees shall be paid and construction permits shall be obtained from the City Engineers Office in addition to any other permits required. 6. Street trees, a minimum of 15-galion size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in / / - accordance with the City's street tree program. 2/91 lOof 12 ~ 7, I~e~n line of s~e des~ns shall ~ revi~ by the C~y E~ineer for ~or~n~ a. On ~ll~or or la~er tareats, lines of s~ shall ~ ploM~ for all proj~ i~e~e~ions, J ..1 i~di~ ~r~ays. Wal~, s~ns, m~ s~s shall ~ ~ o~s~e me lines of La~i~ a~ offier o~t~ns w~hin the li~s of ~ht shall ~ ~roved by the ~ineer. ~. ~1 res~emial ~met i~em~ s~ll ~ve their ~t~e~ilHy improved, u~al~ by / / ~vi~ the 2 +/- c~se~ ~rel trees on each s~e ~ay from me s%ree% a~ place~ in a street tree ease~m. Y 8. A pe~ shall ~ omaine~ from CALTRANS for any ~ w~hin the lol~win9 ~f-way: / / 9. All ~blic i~mvemems on me fol~wi~ stF~ls s~ll ~ o~rm~nal~ ~mplete prior to the / /-- issua~e of bui~i~ ~s: N. Public Malnlermnce Areas V/ 1. A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. The following landscape perkways, medians, -pseee~~-"~,--~eg~8~mss are required to be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance District:, / 2. A sillned consent and waiver torm Io join ancl/orform lhe appropriale Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer priorto final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. V/ 3. All required public landscaping and irrigation systems- shall be continuously maintained by the developer until accepted by the City. · v/ 4. Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective Beautification Master Ran: O. Drainage arKI Fkxxl Control 1. The project (or pertions thereof) is located within a Flood Hazard Zone; therefore. fiood / / protection measures shall be provided as certified by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer. 2. It shall be the developer's responsibility to have the current FIRM Zone /---J designation removed from the project area. The developer's engineer shall prepare all necessary reports, plans, and hydrologic/hydraulic calculations. A Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) shall be obtained from FEMA prior to final map apfxoval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. A Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) shall be issued by FEMA prior to occupancy or improvement acceptance, whichever occurs first. 3. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final / /~ map approval or the issuance of building permits. whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. L SC- 219 1 11 of' 12 4. A pe~ from the ~u~ Fb~ Comml Dim~ is r~uimd for worn wRhin ~s~ht~f-way. ~ 5. Trees am pmhib~ w~hin 5 feet of the outs~e diamter of any publ~ mo~ drain pi~ measur~ from the outer ~e of a mmure tree trunk. ~ 6. Public mo~ drain easemems shall ~ gmd~ to ~mey ovedl~s in the evem of a b~age in a su~ ~tch ~sin on the ~bl~ mmet. P. Utllitls 1. Pmv~e ~pamte miliW seNSes to each ~ml i~bdi~ sanRa~ s~emge symem, water, gas, el~ ~wer, telep~ne, a~ ~ble ~ (all u~e~mund) in a=ma~e w~h the Util~ Sta~ards. Easemems shall ~ pmvid~ as r~uir~. 2.~e deveb~r shall ~ res~nsible for the minion of eximi~ mil~ies as ne~a~. 3. Water a~ s~er p~ns shall ~ des~n~ a~ ~nmm~ to ~t the r~uimmems of the Cu~m~a ~u~ Water Dim~ (CCWD), Ra~ Cu~m~a Fire Pmt~tbn Dist~, a~ the Envimnmemal Heath De~dmm of t~ C~ of San Bernardira. A le~er of ~mplia~e from t~ CCWD ~ r~i~ p~r to final ~ ~mval or issua~e of ~s, wh~hever ~m flint. Q. General Requirements and Approvals 1. The separate parcels contained within the project boundaries shall be legally combined into one parcel prior to issuance of building permits. 2. An easement for a joint use ddveway shall be provided prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first, for: 3. Prior to approval of the final map a deposit shall be posted with the City covedng the estimated cost of apportioning the assessments under Assessment District among the newly cremed parcels. v/ 4. Etiwand~San Sevaina Area Regional Mainline, Secondary Regional, and Master Plan / / Drainage Fees shall be paid prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved. V/ 5. Permits shall be obtained from the following agencies for work within their right-of-way: Facilities District shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the Developer. 7. Prior to finalizaticn of any development phase, sutfident improvement plans shall be corn- / / pieted beyond the phase boundaries to assure secondary access and drainage protection to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Phase boundaries shall correspond to lot lines shown on the approved tentative map. SC - 2/9 1 12 of 12 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 8, 1992 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Nancy Fong, Senior Planner SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 91 - 15 - MONARCH FOODS ( SHAKEY ' S ) - The development of a 5,000 square foot restaurant within the Terra Viste Town Center in the Community Commercial District of the Terra Vista Planned Community, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, east of Haven Avenue - APN: 1077-421-76. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested by Applicant: Approval of the detailed site plan, conceptual landscape plan, and elevations- B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Terra Vista Town Center; Community Commercial District South - Existing restaurant, vacant fields; Industrial Park District (Subarea 7) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan East - Undeveloped land; Office/Professional District within Tetra Vista Planned Community West - Terra Vista Town Center; Community Commercial District within Terra Vista Planned Community C- General Plan Designations: Project Site - Community Commercial North - Co~unity Commercial South - Industrial Park East - Office/Professional West - Community Commercial D. Site Characteristics: The site is vacant and padded out. All the public improvements and some of the on-site landscaping has been completed- The immediate parking area is improved. E · Parkin~ Calculations: Number of Nnmher of Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces of Use Footage Ratio Required Provided Restaurant 4,500 1/100 45 outdoor seating 500 1/100 .. 5 Total 50 50 IT[M M PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR 91-15 - MONARCH FOODS (SHAKEY'S) April 8, 1992 Page 2 ANALYSIS: A. General: The site is one of the conceptually approved restaurant pads within the Terra Vista Town Center. The restaurant consists of 4,500 square feet of interior floor area and 500 square feet of outdoor seating at the south side of the building. The design of the building is compatible with the architectural style established in the Terra Vista Town Center. To accommodate the outdoor seating area, the Design Review Committee has agreed to a Minor Exception to decrease the building setback for the stone columns from 38 feet to 34 feet- Upon approval of this project, the City Planner will approve the Minor Exception application (ME 92-04)- B. Design Review Committee: The Committee (Tolstoy, Vallette, Kroutil) initially reviewed the proposed project on January 2, 1992~ and identified several site and architectural design concerns- The applicant has revised the development plans to address those concerns. The Committee (Tolstoy, Melcher, Kroutil) reviewed the revised plans on February 6, 1992, and recommended approval with the following conditions: 1. The tower element should be of the shorter plastered dome with an architecture element at the top of the dome instead of the proposed ball. 2. The pedestrian connection located north of the building should be modified to decrease the width of the connection, subject to City Planner review and approval. The design of the walkway should be of integral colored concrete, 12 inches square, consistent with the shopping center- 3- The proposed loading/delivery parking space should be increased to minimum size of 22 feet by 12 feet- C. Environmental Assessment: On December 9, 1987, the Planning Commission issued a Negative Declaration for the Terra Vista Town Center project which includes the development of this restaurant pad. The development of this project will not have any significant impact on the environment- FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan and the Terra Vista Planned Community and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. The proposed use and the project is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code and the Terra Vista Planned Community. The proposed use and the project, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity- PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR 91-15 - MONARCH FOODS (SHAKEY'S) April 8, 1992 Page 3 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Development Review 91-15. Respec y subm' d, ler BB: NF: mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site Utilization Map Exhibit "B" - Detailed Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Conceptual Landscape Plan Exhibit "D" - Elevations Resolution of Approval with Conditions RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 91-15, FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 5,000 SQUARE FOOT RESTAURANT WITHIN THE TERRA VISTA TOWN CENTER, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, EAST OF HAVEN AVENUE IN THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1077-421-76. A. Recitals. (i) Monarch Foods has filed an application for the approval of Development Review No. 91-15 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application-" (ii) On the of 8th day of April 1992, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct- 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting on April 8, 1992, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, east of Haven Avenue with a street frontage of 100 feet and lot depth of 130 feet and is presently improved with curb, gutter, sidewalk and on-site landscaping; and (b) The property to the north of the subject site is a shopping center, the property to the south is developed with a restaurant and the remainder area is vacant, the property to the east is vacant, and the property to the west is a shopping center; and (c) The proposed project is consistent with the Tetra Vista Town Center Master Plan. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DR 91-15 - MONARCH FOODS - (SHAKEY'S) April 8, 1992 Page 2 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan~ and (b) That the proposed use is in accord with the objective of the Development Code and the Terra Vista Planned Community and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and (c) That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code and the Tetra Vista Planned Community; and (d) That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission issued a Negative Declaration on December 9, 1987- 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planninq Division 1) The tower element shall be of the shorter plaster dome with an architectural element at the top of the dome instead of the proposed ball. The final design of the dome and the architectural element at the top shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 2) The design of the pedestrian walkway located north of the building shall be of integral colored concrete, 12 inches square, consistent with the design established in Tetra Vista Town Center. 3) The stairs going up to the main building shall be of decorative textured materials consistent with the theme established in the Terra Vista Town Center. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DR 91-15 - MONARCH FOODS - (SHAKEY'S) April 8, 1992 Page 3 4) All building materials and colors shall be consistent with the ones approved for the Tetra Vista Town Center such as, but are not limited to, 5 percent randomly placed booster roof tiles, columns, caps, plaster style, size of wood trellis, etc. 5) Sectional roll-up doors shall be provided to the trash enclosure area. 6) All architectural details shall be consistent with the Center such as, but are not limited to, cornice, medallions, trellis, corbel, wall caps, etc. 7) The.developer shall provide at the project site a 10-foot by 12-foot panel showing the sample plaster finish for City Planner review and approval prior to commencement of general plaster work on the building. 8) All outdoor furniture such as, but are not limited to, chairs, tables, trash receptacles, flower pots, etc., shall be compatible with the theme established in the Terra .Vista Town Center, and subject to City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 9) The plant pallette shall be consistent with the theme established in the Center. 10) All proposed shrubs and vines shall be a minimum of 5-gallon size. 11) Shrub massing' such as placing them 3 feet on .center, shall be provided along the east, west, and north elevations. 12) A low profile decorative wall shall be provided separating the outdoor seating area from the landscaped area. Shrub massing shall be provided in front of this decorative wall. The final design shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 13) Additional trees shall be provided along the west elevation. The tree species and size shall match the existing ones west of the entry drive. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DR 91-15 - MONARCH FOODS - (SHAKEY'S) April 8, 1992 Page 4 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution- APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF APRIL 1992. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Bullet, Secretary I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of April 1992, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (714) 989-1861, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. Time Urnits V//1. Approval shall expire, unless extended by the Pinning Commission, ff building permits are ---/----/ not issued or approved use has not commenced within 24 months from the date of approval. 2. Development/Design Review shall be approved prior to / / .. .J / 3. Approval of Tentative Tract No. is granted subject to the approval of / / 4. The developer shall commence, participate in, and consummate or cause to be commenced .J /---- participated in, or consummated, a Mello-Roos Community Fadlitles District (CFD) for the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District to finance construction and/or maintenance of a fire station to serve the developmeN. The station shall be located, designed, and built to all specifications of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and shall become the Districts property upon completion. 'The equipment shall be selected by the Distdct in accordance with its needs, In any building of a station, the developer shall comply with all applicable laws and regulations. The CFD shall be formed by the District and the developer by the time recordation of the finel map occurs. 5. Prior to recordation of the final map or the issuance of building porrntts, whichever comes J /""- first, the applicant shall consent to, or participate in, the establishment of a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District lot the construction and maintenance of necessary school facilities. However, ff any school district has previously established such a Community Fadlities District, the applicant shall, in the alternaive, consera to the annexation of the project site into the territory of such existing District prior to the recordation of the final map or the issuance ol building permits, whichever comes first. Further, it the affected school district has not formed a Mello-Rcos Community Facilities District within twelve months from the date of approval of the project and prior to the recordation of the final map or issuance of building permits for said project, this condition shall be deemed null and void. ~ - 2/91 ~ ' & Proie~t No.:D.f",- c//'/j This condition shall be waived ff the City receives notice that the applicant and all affected school districts have entered into an agreement to privately accommodate any and all school impacts as a result of this project. 6. Prior to recordation of the final map or prior to issuance of building permits when no map is / / involved, written certification from the affeded water district that adequate sewer and water facilities are or will be available to serve the proposed project shall be submitted to the Departmere of Community Development. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. B, Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the appmved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, and / Specific Plan and Planned Community. 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all ___J /___ Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. x~'.J. Occupancy of the fadlity shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and _.-/ / State I=im Marshairs regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division to show compliance. The building shall be inspected for compliance pdor to occupancy. 4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be · / submitted for City Planner review and approv~ prior to issuance of building permits. 5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for /----J-- consistency pdorto issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.), or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lit subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. ,,,../6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development /_--J-- Code, all other applicable City Ordinances. and applicable Community Plans or Specific Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 7. A detailed on-site lighting plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner and J .J Sheriff's Department (989-6611 ) prior to the issuance of building permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, lotlion, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacem properties. 8. If no centralized trash receptacles are provided, all trash pick-up shall be for individual units __./ J . with all receptacles shielded from public view. \/9. Trash reoeptacie(s) am required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, ---/ / - and the number of trash receptacles shall he subject to City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 10. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall ---/ J- be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City 2 SC - 2/91 ~-~t .No.: D~ ~'/'/~' 11. Street names shall be subm~ lor C~y Planner review a~ approval in a~rda~e w~h I ./ the a~ ~reet Nami~ Pol~y p~r to ~mval of the final m~. 12. All ~i~i~ ~m~m a~ i~iv~ual un~s shall ~ ~ent~i~ in a clear a~ ~ise manner, i~ludi~ ~r illuminat~n. 13. A detailed plan ind~ti~ trail w~ths, ~i~m s~pes, phys~l ~ns, fendS, a~ ~ ./~ we~ ~mml, in a~a~e w~h C~ Mamer Trail dr~ings, ~all ~ ~bmi~ for C~y Planner m~ a~ a~mval p~r to ~mval a~ rein ~at~n of t~ Final Tra~ Map a~ p~r to ~mval of street improvemere a~ gradi~ plans. Deve~r s~ll u~rade a~ ~nmmd all trails, i~ding fe~ing and drainage dev~s, in ~n~n wRh ~reet improvements. 14. The ~venams, ~R~ns a~ Re~ns (CC&Rs) s~ll mt mh~ t~ keepi~ of ~uine J animls where zoni~ r~uiremms forthe kee~ of ~ animls have b~n met. I~i~dual ~t ownera in su~is~ns ~all have the o~n of kee~ ~ animaBwR~m the n~ess~y of ~ealing to ~a~s of dir~om or ~m~wnem' assigns for amndmms to the CC&Rs. 15. ~e ~venants, ~ions, a~ Re~ns (CC&Rs) a~ Affides of Inm~rmion of the / J Ho~wnem' ~iat~n are subj~ to t~ ~val of t~ Pinni~ a~ E~ineeri~ D~is~ns a~ the C~ A~0~y. They s~ll ~ re~ ~ffemly wRh the Final M~ or p~r to t~ Bsua~e of ~i~i~ ~Rs, whoever ~m flint. A r~ffi~ ~PY shall ~ pmv~ed to t~ CiW Engin~r. 16. NI pa~ays, o~n areas, a~ ~nd~ s~ll ~ ~~m~ ~main~ by the pmpe~ ..7 owner, homownem' as~imbn, or ot~r ma~ a~p~i to t) C~. Pmf of this land~ maimena~e s~ll ) mb~ for C~ Plan~r a~ C~ E~i~er rev~w a~ ~oval ~r to ~suan~ of bui~i~ ~Rs. 17. ~lar ross easerams s~ll ) ~ed for t~ ~ of a~uming thin each lot or ~elli~ unit shall have the ~ to r~ke ~nl~ ~mB adam bts or un~ for use of ' a ~lar ene~ system. ~e easerams my ~ ~m~ in a ~rm~n of Rest~ns for t~. su~iv~n wh~h s~ll ~ m~ ~ffem~ ~ ~ ~bn of the final m~ or issua~ of ~s, whmver ~ms tim. h e~mms mall ~h~ the ~ing of sha~s by v~etm~n, ~ures, from or a~ omr ~, ex~ for mil~ wires a~ simimr ~s, ~mm to ~vemm ~ ~n 17 .~ .06~2. 18. T~ pm~ ~ntaim a ~s~ Hi~o~l ~m~. T~ sRe sMII be de~ a~ J / mimai~d in ~a~ wHh tM Hi~o~ La~m~ AHem~n Pe~R ~. . Any further ~~m to tM she i~i~, ~ m limR~ to, e~edor aRerm~ a~or ime~r aRerm~ns ~h ~ffi t~ e~e~r of tM ~i~i~ or toNSures, mmval of i~mam trees, ~mlH~n, re~m~n, r~nm~n of ~i~i~ or toNSures, or cM~es to the sRe, shall r~im a ~ff~n ~ ~ Hitore ~m~ ~erm~n Pe~ ~b~ to Historic Prese~m~n Comiss~n rev~ a~ ;val. C. Building ~lgn 1. An a~e~t~e e~y symm ~ r~imd to ~v~ ~mm~ ~t wmer for all ~elli~ un~s a~ for ~ating a~ ~im~ ~1 ~ ~, unlss otMr aRe~ive e~ symem are dem~ to ~ of ~i~m ~c~ a~ e~. NI ~im~ ~ i~al~ m the tim of in~l deve~mem sMII ~ ~emm~ w~ ~ir hemi~. ~tails sMII im~d~ in t~ ~i~i~ ~a~ a~ sMII N ~ml~ for C~y Ran~r rev~ a~ ~mval pmr to t~ issua~e of ~i~ing ~s. 2. All ~elli~ s~ll have t~ front, s~ a~ rear e~vm~ns u~raded w~h archit~tural J trammere, detaili~ a~ i~reas~ deli~m~n of ~d~ tremmm su~ to C~ Planner revi~ a~ ~mval p~r to issua~ of ~i~i~ ~s. 3 3. Standard patio cover plans for use by the Homeowners' Association shall be submitted for / City Planner and Building Official review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. ~//'4. All roof appurtenances. including air conditioners and other root mounted equipment and/or /-----/ '- projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered lrom adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Division. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Details shall be included in building plans· ParkIn and Vehicular Access (Indicate dills on bulkling plans) . . All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall / contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curb). 2. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be /---J provided throughout the development to connect dwe Ilings/units/bu ildings with open spacos/ V///3 plazas/recreational uses. · All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, ---/ entrances, and exits shal! be striped per City standards. 4. All units shall be provided with garage door openers ff driveways are less than 18 feet in ----J depth from beck of sidewalk. 5. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions shall restrict the storage of recreational vehicles ----/ on this site unless they am the principal source of transportation for the owner and prohibit parking on interior circulation aisles other than in designated visitor parking areas. 6. Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the City Planner, City Engineer, and / / Rancho Cuc. amonga Fire Protection District review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. E. Landscaping (for publicly maintained landscape areas, refer to Section N.) V'/1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscap- J / ing in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Ranner review and approval priorto the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. 2. Existing trees required t~ be preserved in piace shal~ be pmtected with a c~netruction berrier / J ' in accordance with the Municipal Code Section 19.08.110, and so noted on the grading plans. The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall he Shown on the detailed landscape plans. The al:~icant shall follow all of the arbodst's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting and trimming methods. 3. Aminimumof treespergrossacre,comprisedofthefoliowingsizes, shall be Pr°vided 'J · ' within the project: % - 48- inch box or larger, % - 36- inch box or larger, % - 24- inch box or larger, __ % - 15-gallon, and __ % - 5 gallon. 4. A minimum of % of trees planted within the project shall be specimen size trees -- /----J - 24-inch box or larger. 5. Within parking lots, trees shall be plamed at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three ../_._J_ parking stalls, sufficient to shade 50% of the parking area at solar noon on August 21. 2/91 6. Pt~ie~ No.: 6. Tr~ shall ~ pla~ ~n areas o( publ~ view adjace~ ~o a~ a~ng s~m~u r~s a~ a rate o( one tree ~r 30 linear feet of ~i~i~. // 7. All p~e s~ ~ 5 feet or ~ss in venUl he~ht a~ of 5:1 orgmater s~, but leH than // 2:1 s~, shall be, at miniram, i~at~ a~ la~~ w~h a~mpfiate grou~ ~ver for emsbn ~rol. SIo~ plami~ r~uir~ W this s~n shall i~lude a pe~nem i~atbn sy~em to ~ in~all~ by the deve~r p~r to ~n~. 8. AIIp~ates~sinexcessof5feet, b~lessthan8 feet inven~alhe~andof2:l orgreater // sb~ shall be la~d a~ iffigat~ for erosbn ~mml a~ to ~en their a~ara~ as fol~ws: one 15~albn or la~er s~e trH ~r each 150 ~. ft. of s~ area, 1 ~al~n or la~er s~e shmb ~r each 1 ~ ~. ~. of s~ area, a~ ~m~e gmu~ ~ver. In a~Hion, s~ ~nks in ex~ss of 8 feet in ve~l ~igM a~ of 2:1 or greter s~ shall al~ i~lude one 5~albn or la~er s~e tree ~r each 250 ~. ~. of s~ area. TrHs a~ shmN s~ll plam~ in ~a~emd cb~em to ~en a~ va~ s~ ~ne. SIo~ ~ami~ r~uir~ by this s~ion shall i~lude a ~anem iff~atbn sy~em to ~ in~all~ by t~ deve~r ~r to ~~y. 9. For sidle fa~ res~e~ial deve~pm~, all sb~ ~mi~ a~ i~atbn shall ~ ~inu- / / ous~ mimain~ in a hea~ aM thdvi~ ~bn by t~ ~veb~r umil e~h i~Mdual u nh is ~ a~p~d byt~ ~yer. P~rto re~Bi~ o~pa~for~H un~s, an ins~bn shall ~ ~u~ by t~ Ranning DMsion to dete~ t~ they am in sati~a~o~ 0~bn. . For ~Hami~ res~emial a~ ~res~ential deve~m, pm~ ~ are resin- / / sible lot the ~ntinual ~i~e~e of ~1 la~~ areas on-~e, ~ well as ~m~uous pla~ areas w~hin the ~ ~l-way. ~1 la~ areas 8hall we~s a~ debris a~ ~i~i~ in a heaR~ a~ ~i~ ~bn, a~ s~ll r~We r~ular pruning, fe~il~i~, ~i~, a~ tdmmi~. ~ ~mged, ~ad, disease, or d~ying p~m retell shall ~ r~ w~hin 30 ~ys from t~ ~e of ~mage. 11. Front yaffi la~ing sMII ~ r~ir~ ~r t~ ~ve~m ~ a~/or ~ / ..... . ~is reim~m s~ll ~ in ~bn to t~ r~uir~ street trees a~ s~ plami~, 12. ~e final ~s~n of tM ~d~ter ~ays, walt, i~~, aN s~ewal~ shall ~ / J i~d~ in ~ r~i~ la~ Nns a~ sMII N ~ to C~ Pin~r rev~ a~ ~val aM =ffii~ for ~e~ Hh a~ ~ay i~i~ Nn wh~ ~y r~imd by t~ E~i~dng DN~bn. 13. S~I i~ fea~res ~h u ~i~, alluv~ ~, ~i~n s~e trees, meager- . i~ s~wa~ (w~h ~omal cM~e), a~ ~e~ff~ i~~, ~4. La~i~ aM i~bn W~e~ m~ir~ to N i~al~ wehin tM ~ ~t~ay on / / . tN pedmter ~ thl pm~ area sMII N .~mi~us~ mim~ W IM ~ve~er. 15. All walls sMII ~ pm~ w~h ~rative tinatom. If ~ in ~bl~ mi~en~ areas / / t~ des~n shall N ~ffiina~ w~h t~ E~i~ed~ D~n. 16. Tre mimena~ cffieM s~ll ~ ~~ a~ ~l~ br C~ Pin~r rev~w a~ ~ / ~mval ~r to ~ame of ~i~i~ ~s. ~-- cffieda sMII e~rage the Mtural g~h ~ara~ed~ of the ~1~ tre ~s. 17. La~i~ and i~at~n shall N ~s;~ to ~n~Ne water thr~gh the pd~iples of / J Xed~ as defi~ in Cheer 19.16 of ~ Ran~ Cu~~ Mun~l SC - 2/9 1 5 F. Signs ~ 1. ~e igns i~ on the subm~ plans are ~e~ual only and ~t a Pad of this~mval. ~y sj~ pm~d for this deve~pmnt shall ~ly w~h the S~n Ordinate a~ shall rffiuim ~rate ~lication a~ ~proval by the Planni~ DNisbn p~r to inmallat~n of any s~ns. 2. AUn~o~S~npr~ramforthisdeve~pmemshall~subm~forC~Planner reviewa~ ~roval pdor to issua~e of bui~i~ ~s. 3. Dir~o~ mnumem s~n(s) shall ~ pmv~ for ~mm, ~ominium, or town~s p~r to ~~ a~ shall r~uim separ~e a~l~n a~ ~mval by the Planni~ D~isbn p~r to ~sua~e of ~i~i~ ~s. G. Environmental 1. ~e ~veb~r shall pmv~e ea~ pms~ive ~yer w~en ~t~ of the Fou~h Street Ro~ Cms~r mj~ in a sta~ard fo~at as detemn~ by the C~y Planner, p~r to a~pti~ a ~sh ~s~ on any pmpe~. 2. ~e ~velo~r shall provide ea~ pms~e ~yer w~en ~t~e of the C~y A~ S~il S~dies Zo~ for the R~ Hill F~, in a ~a~ffi fo~at as dete~in~ by the C~ Planner, p~r to a~e~i~ a ~sh de~s~ on a~ ~. 3. ~e devel~r shall prov~e e~h pms~e ~yer wffien mt~e of t~ Foothill Freeway pm~ in a sta~affi fo~at as dete~i~ W t~ C~ Pin~r, ~r to a~e~i~ a ~sh ~s~ on any pro~. 4. A fill a~u~l rein s~ll ~ ~m~ed for C~ Pinher review a~ ~roval pdor to the is~a~ of ~i~ing ~s. The final rein s~li d~ss t~ Ivel of i~e~r ~ise ~enui~n to bebw 45 CNEL, t~ ~iMi~ ~edals ~ ~n~m~bn t~hn~ues pmv~, a~ ff ~m~ate, ve~ t~ ad~a~ of t~ m~n ma~res. T~ bui~i~ ~ans will ~ c~ for ~o~ w~h t~ ~at~n masures ~mai~ in t~ final r~. H. ~her Agencle 1. E~~~a~~sMIIN~v~ina=ffia~w~hRa~Cu~aFire t~n Di~ 9aMa~. ~ ~. E~~a~sMIIN~v~,maimeMmefreea~ciar, a mini~mof261eetw~e ' ~ all time ~ ~~n in a~ffia~ w~h Ra~ C~m~a Fire Pmt~n i~ r~im~ni. r~r to ~ of ~i~i~ ~s for ~i~ ~t~n, e~e s~ll ~ su~ to t~ Ra~ ~~ Rm P~n D~ t~ te~ra~ waer ~ for fire pmt~n ~ ~aiIM, ~i~ ~t~n of r~uir~ fire ~ot~n s~tem. ~ ~ ~e ~m shall ~ ~ U. S. Po~al ~w~ to ~te~i~ t~ ~date t~ a~ ~t~n of mail ~xes. Mull-family res~e~i~ ~ve~s shall ~v~ a ~1~ oveffiead ~ure tor rail ~xes w~h Me~ie I~Mi~. ~e ~al ~t~n of t~ mail ~xes a~ the ~s;n of t~ ove~ad ~Nmre ~all N su~ to C~ Pin~r rev~ a~ a~roval p~r to the ~a~e of ~i~i~ ~Hs. 5. For projects using septic tank facilities, written certification of acceptability, including all / /- supportive irdorrnation, shell be obtained from the San Bernardino County Department of Environmental Health and submitted to the Building Official prior to the issuance of Septic Tank Permits, and prior to issuance of building permits. SC - 2/91 6 Proira No.:D~ ~ t- I~~' ~PPLICANTS SH~ CO~A~ THE BUILDING AND SAF~ DIVISION, ~14) ~-1~, FOR COMPLIANCE ~ ~E FOLLOWING ~NDITIONS: I. SRe ~ 1. ~e ~am shall ~y w~h t~ late~ a~pt~ Unffo~ Bui~i~ ~. Unffo~ M~hani- / / .... cal ~e, Unffo~ Plumbi~ ~e, Nat~nal E~ ~e. a~ all ot~r a~li~ ~des, offiina~s, a~ r~lat~ in eff~ m t~ ti~ of ~a~ of relatNe ~Rs. Please ~mad the Bui~i~ a~ Safe~ D~is~n for ~pies of t~ ~ ~n Offiina~e a~ ~~ han~ms. 2. P~r to mua~ of ~iMi~ ~ts for a n~ resimil ~elli~ unR(s) or mawr a~H~n / to existi~ unR(s), the ~m ~all pay ~ve~mnt fes m t~ em~i~ rme. ~ fees a~;~ i~lude, bm am ~t lim~ to: C~ Beau~n Fee, Pa~ Fe, Drai~ge Fee, Symems Deve~pmnt Fee, Pe=~ a~ Pin C~i~ Fes, a~ ~i Fes. r to i~a~e of ~i~ing ~s for a n~ ~mial or i~mdal ~velo~em or / / . t~n to an ex~i~ deve~pmm, t~ ~m s~ll ~y ~ve~pmem fees at the est~lis~d rme. ~ch fees may i~de, ~ le mt li~ to: Syme~ Deve~mnt Fee. Drainage Fe, ~ol FeeS, Pe~H a~ Plan Ch~ Fees. et a~re~es shall ~ pm~ by the Bui~i~ ~, ~ertra~l ~ r~at~n a~ pmr to i~ua~e of ~i~i~ ~s. J, bl~lng 1. Pmv~e ~lia~e w~h t~ Unffo~ ~i~i~ ~ for ~e ~ line cleara~s / / ~ns~ed~ use, area, ~ fim~esim~e~ of ex~i~ ~i~i~s. 2. ~imi~ ~i~i~ s~ll ~ ~e to ~ w~h ~ff~ ~i~i~ a~ zoni~ r~ultb~ for / / t~ ime~ use or t~ ~ildi~ s~ll ~ ~ml~, 3. ~imi~ s~e di~sal fadiRis s~ll ~ mmv~, fii~ a~or ~ to ~ly with the / Unffo~ P~mi~ ~ a~ Unffo~ ~i~i~ ~e. 4. U~mu~ om~e ~ilR~s are to ~ ~ a~ ~ on ~i~i~ ~ns sum~ for / / ~i~i~ ~ ~tbn. K,~~ Gradi~oft~~~s~l~~m~w~h~Unffo~i~i~,C~ "/ / G~i~ Sta~, a~ m~ g~i~ ~s. ~ fill g~i~ ~n s~ll ~ in su~amial ~om~ dh t~ ~v~ gr~i~ ~. 2. A ~ils r~d s~ll ~ ~r~ ~ a ~alilid e~i~r I~ W t~ Stme of California to / / 1o~ ~ ~. e ~vemm ~ ~ w~hin t~ ~il ems~n ~mml ~ms; a ~il D~u~e / / Pe~ ~ r~ir~. Pia~ ~mm San ~m ~u~ ~amm of ~Rum m (714) ~7-2111 for ~ ~t~n. ~mm~n of m~ ~ s~ll ~ ~m~ to t~ CRy p~r to t~ ~ua~ ol ~h gr~i~ ~R. 4. A g~l re~d s~ll ~ ~e~r~ by a qualff~ e~i~r or g~t a~ ~m~ at / / - t~~ tim of ~l~n for gr~i~ ~an c~. · fill gradi~ ~ans shall ~ ~It~ a~ ~v~ ~r to ~sua~ of ~ i~i~ ~Rs. / / ~ - 2/9 ] 7