Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1992/07/22 - Agenda Packet ~'~~ CITY OF ~ RANCHO CUCA~ PLANNI COMMItION AGENDA - 1977 WEDNESDAY JULY 22, 1992 7:00 P.M. RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBER 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA I. Pledge of Allegiance II. Roll Call Commissioner Chitiea Commissioner Tolstoy Commissioner McNiel Commissioner Vallette Commissioner Melcher III. Announcements IV. Approval of Minutes June 24, 1992 Adjourned Meeting of June 30, 1992 V. Consent Calendar The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted on by the Commission at one time without discussion. If anyone has concern over any item, it should be removed for discussion. A. TIME EXTENSION FOR PARCEL MAP 12275 - (VAUGHN) BELYEU - A request for an extension of a previously approved subdivision of 1.04 acres of land into 3 parcels in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located on the west side of Hellman Avenue, south of Pepper Street - APN: 208-162-30 VI. Public Hearings The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related project. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. Please sign in after speaking. B. VARIANCE 92-02 - SILVA - A request to reduce the required interior side yard setback from 5 feet to 6 inches from the property line for a single family home in the Low Residential district (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at 10077 Ironwood Street - APN: 1077-041-64. C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 92-19 - ATCO STRUCTURES, INC. - The request to establish a Heavy Equipment Sales and Rentals operation on 10.37 acres of land in the Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial district (Subarea 9) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, located at 10807 Jersey Boulevard - APN: 209-143-08. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. D. MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 85-04 - ETIWANDA HISTORICAL SOCIETY/CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to construct a 2,500 square foot barn on the Chaffey-Garcia site to be used as a museum and caretaker's residence on a 1 acre site in the Low-Medium Residential designation (4-8 dwelling units per acre) of the Victoria Planned Community, located on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue, north of Base Line Road - APN: 227-513-05. E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 91-37 - CARL KARCHER ENTERPRISES, INC. - A request to construct a 3,275 square foot fast food restaurant (with drive-thru) within an existing shopping center in the Neighborhood Commercial designation of the Terra Vista Planned Community, located at the southeast corner of Base Line Road and Milliken Avenue - APN: 227-151-21 Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 91-21 - L. A. CELLULAR - The development of a cellular telecommunications facility consisting of a 10-foot by 10-foot equipment building and a 60-foot monopole antenna located on a fully developed industrial site in the General Industrial district (Subarea 14) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, located at 9320 Hyssop Drive - APN: 229-321-02. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. G. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 91-24 - MASI - The development of 32 buildings totaling approximately 268,907 square feet and comprised of a mix of industrial, multi-tenant, office and restaurant .uses in the Industrial Park district (Subarea 7) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, located at the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue - APN: 229-011-10, 19, 21, 26, 27, and 28. Associated with the project is Parcel Map 13845. Staff recommends issuance of a mitigated Negative Declaration. H. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEl0 MAP 13845 - MASI - A subdivision of 30.2 acres of land into 31 parcels in the Industrial Park district (Subarea 7) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, located at the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue - APN: 229-011-10, 19, 21, 26, 27, and 28. Associated with this project is Conditional Use Permit 91-24. Staff recommends issuance of a mitigated Negative Declaration. VII. Commission Business VIII. Public Comments This is the time and place for the general public to address the Commission. Items to be discussed here are those which do not already appear on this agenda. IX. Adjournment The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11:00 P.M. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission. VICINITY MAP · ' .......................... ~s~i'..'. / I ' ' '" .......... "i~iiii::i~::iiiiiiii::i::iiiiiii ~::i::i::::::ii::::iiii~i~ii::i::!i~::ii~/"""F::' ' c~.r, .. Hills'de ~','~" :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: liiii::i::iii::!::i::i!iiiiii!iiiiii!i Foo~hFreeway \ ~, ~) ~' .' ~ ( ........ ..~.~ ~, -~' ~,,,~ _ · ~ ',-~/__1r I ! / i ; ' ..\tI ~t I ,, , ,,, i 'k CITY HALL CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY OF RANCH0 CUCAMONGA DATE: July 22, 1992STAFF REPORT TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer BY: Vicki Day, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSION FOR PARCEL MAP 12275 -(VAUGHN) BELYEU -A subd'iviS~on of 1.04 acres of lind 'int'6"3 'pa~el~ 'in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located on the west side of Hellman Avenue, south of Pepper Street - APN: 208-162-30. BACKGROUND: Tentative Parcel Map 12275 as shown on Exhibit "C" was initially approved by the Planning Commission on June 13, 1990 for an initial two year period until June 13, 1992. The applicant is now requesting the first of a possible three one-year time extensions. The letter of request (Exhibit "A") is attached for your reference. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: A. There have been no significant changes in the Land Use Element of the General Plan, Development Code, or character of the area within which the project is located, that would cause the approved project to become i nconsi stent or non-conformi ng. B. The granting of an extension should not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. RECOMMENDATI ON: It is recommended that the Planning Commission adopt the attached resolution approving a one-year time extension for Parcel Map 12275. The new expiration date would be June 13, 1993. Respectful 1 y submitted, Senior Civil Engineer DJ :VD ,. .... Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Letter of Request Exhibit "B" - Vicinity Map Exhibit "C" - Tentative Map me i n RECEIVED JUN lO 1992 TO: City of Rancho Cucamonga RE: Parcel Map 12275 Due to the current drop in real property sales, and the high cost of recording, I am finacially unable to record at this time. Please accept this letter as request for a time extension- Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Linda Belyeu /":/OZ)EJ N CITY OF ~_._/~R. Pjc'~ M/~ IZ:~7~ .... RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~ I/I~INITY M FIP ENGINF. I~,ING DIVISION' EXI-rmIT: N CITY OF rrEM: P/IR~F_L M~IP I~j?. 72 RANCHO CUCAMONGA Tm,,E: T"r_M'F~TI VE M~P I~tCrIN~;EIING DIVISION. EXt.WRIT: ~-- RESOLUTION NO. 90-73 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NUMBER 12275, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF HELLMAN AVENUE, SOUTH OF PEPPER STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 208-162-30 WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 12275, submitted by Linda Vaughn, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing into 3 parcels, the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, identified as APN 208-162-30, located on the west side of Hellman Avenue, south of Pepper Street, and WHEREAS, on June 13, 1990, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing for the above-described map. NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING CO~)4ISSION RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the following findings have been made: 1. That the map is consistent with the General Plan. 2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan. 3.That the site is physically suitable for the proposed development. 4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage or public health problems or have adverse affects on abutting properties. SECTION 2: This Commission finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970; and further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration. SECTION 3: Tentative Parcel Map Number 12275 is hereby approved subject to the attached Standard Conditions and the following Special Conditions: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 90-73 TENT PM 12275 VAUGHN JUNE 13, 1990 PAGE 2 A. Engineering Division: l. An in-lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (telecommunication and electrical) on the opposite side of Hellman Avenue shall be paid to the City prior to approval of the final map. The fee shall be one-half the City adopted unit amount times the length of the project frontage. 2. Shared Access: a. The narrow (134'x20') flag portion of Parcel 3 shall be reserved as a common access easement in favor of all three parcel s. b. The common drive approach and portion of the owners on- site driveway extending a sufficient distance on-site to serve Parcel 1 shall be constructed prior to recordation of the record map. c. The existing drive approach and portion of the on-site driveway within Parcel 1 to no longer be used upon completion of the shared access shall be removed and replaced with landscaping on-site and standard public street improvements within the Hellman Avenue right-of- way prior to approval of the record map. d. A reciprocal maintenance agreement shall be recorded for the common driveway. 3. It shall be the Developer's responsibility to have the current FIRM Zone A designation removed from the project area. The Developer's Engineer shall prepare all necessary reports, plans, hydrologic/hydraulic calculations, etc. Approval shall be obtained from FEMA prior to approval of the record map or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. The designation shall be officially removed prior to occupancy or improvement acceptance, whichever occurs first. B. Building Division: 1. Provide a private drainage easement along the south project boundary of Parcel 2 in favor of Parcel 3. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 90-73 TENT PM 12275 - VAUGHN JUNE 13, 1990 PAGE 3 2. The installation of all on-site drainage devices shall be guaranteed by a bond prior to final approval of the Parcel Map. C. Fire Protection District: 1. Structures or portions of structures which extend beyond 180 feet of Fire District access shall be protected with automatic fire sprinklers, or alternate means approved by the Fire District. D. Planning Division: 1. No wal 1 or fence shal 1 be constructed wi thin the flag portion of Parcel 3, unless said wall or fence is constructed with at least 90 percent of the top 3 feet of its vertical surface open and non-view obscuring. Further, a minimum of 5 feet of landscaping shall be provided between the driveway and any solid wall for the full depth of the flag portion of Parcel 3. This condition shall be recorded against the property to provide notice to future buyers. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13th DAY OF JUNE, 1990. ' L~rry T iel, Chairma ~ aB~S1 r t t 1 in ' ion of the City of Rancho regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of June, 1990, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES; COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, MCNIEL, MELCHER, TOLSTOY NOES COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: WEINBERGER RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 12275, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF HELLMAN AVENUE, SOUTH OF PEPPER STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 208-162-30 A. Recitals (i) Linda (Vaughn) Belyeu has filed an application for the extension of Tentative Parcel Map 12275 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Time Extension request is referred to as "the application." (ii) On June 13, 1990, this Commission adopted its Resolution No. 90- 73, thereby approving, subject to specific conditions and time limits, Tentative Parcel Map 12275 and issued a Negative Declaration. (iii) On June 10, 1992, the applicant filed a request for a 12-month Time Extension. (iv) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The previously approved Tentative Map is in substantial compliance with the City's current General Plan, specific plans, ordinances, plans, codes, and policies; and (b) The extension of the Tentative Map will not cause significant inconsistencies with the current General Plan, specific plans, ordinances, plans, codes, and policies; and (c) The extension of the Tentative Map is not likely to cause public health and safety problems; and (d) The extension is within the time limits prescribed by state law and local ordinance. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TENT PM 12275 - (VAUGHN) BELYEU July 22, 1992 PAGE 2 3. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby grants a Time Extension for: Parcel Map Applicant Expiration 12275 (Vaughn) Belyeu June 13, 1993 4. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF JULY 1992. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22nd day of July 1992, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA J. y 22, 1992 STAFF REPORT TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Nancy Fong, Senior Planner SUBJECT: VARIANCE 92-02 - SILVA - A request to reduce the required interior side yard setback from 5 feet to 6 inches from the property line for a single family home in the Low Residential district (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at 10077 Ironwood Street - APN: 1077-041-64. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission deny the Variance through adoption of the attached Resolution and direct the applicant to correct the non-conformity within 30 days from this hearing- ANALYSIS: A. Background: The applicant had obtained a building permit on April 5, 1989, to construct a patio cover in the rear yard and a carport in the side yard. The approved plans (as shown in Exhibit "C") showed that a 5-foot side yard setback is required for the carport- The last inspection was on January 23, 1991. According to the Building and Safety Division, a building permit is valid for a period of 180 days from the last (latest) inspection. Therefore, the building permit for the patio cover and carport would have expired on July 23, 1991. A routine inspection by Building and Safety staff on January 9, 1992, documented that the carport structure was almost completed, without the benefit of valid building permits and necessary inspections, nor compliance with the setback requirements. Attached for your reference is a brief chronology for this application (Exhibit "A"). B. Evaluation of the Proposed Variance: The applicant's intended use of the carport is to store a boat. They built the carport, as it currently exists within the 5-foot side yard setback, to make it easier to back the boat into the carport- A copy of the applicant's letter of request is attached for your review- A review of the site plan and a site visit indicates that the northeast corner of the garage is set back 16 feet from the side property line at the closest point- Staff believes that the applicant can modify the carport structure to meet the 5-foot setback and still have a carport wide enough to store the boat, as shown in Exhibit "E." Since the driveway depth as measured from the curb face is 31 feet, there should be enough maneuvering area to back the beat into the carport- It is true a wider space between the carport post and the garage would make it easier to maneuver the boat in and out; however, variances require legal findings of hardship and should not be granted on the basis of convenience, i.e., it's easier to maneuver the boat in and out. IT]~4 B PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT VAR 92-02 - SILVA July 22, 1992 Page 2 Regarding the applicant's claim that they were given the "ok" by the Building and Safety Division to encroach into the 5-foot side yard setback, it cannot be verified. No one in the Building and Safety Division recalls granting such approval, nor did they have the authority to do so. C. Facts for Findings: In order to grant this Variance, the Planning Commission must make all of the findings as listed below: 1- That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the Development Code. Staff Comment: Staff believes that the setback could be met and still provide adequate room to store the boat. 2- That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone. Staff Comment: The applicant has made no claims of unusual circumstances other than the location of utilities within the public right-of-way making it difficult to back the boat in. 3. That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same zone. Staff Comment: The minimum setback of 5 feet would still allow for a carport structure in this location. 4- That the granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same zone. Staff Comment: A reduction in the required setback from 5 feet to only 6 inches would be a special privilege not afforded other property owners in this zone. 5. That the granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. D. Options for the Applicant to Considler: The following options would meet the City's setback requirements while still providing room for storage of the boat within the side yard area: 1. Relocate the wood post to be 5 feet from the property line. The post would be set back further from the street, i.e., 34 feet as measured from the curb to increase the clearance area for maneuvering the boat trailer into the carport. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT VAR 92-02 - SILVA July 22, 1992 Page 3 2. Remove the carport structure. The concrete slab can remain as shown - 6 inches from the property line. Construct a 5-foot high solid fence and gate from the east property line to the building for screening the boat. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the site has been posted, and notices were sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the project site. Respectfully submitted, ~y BB:NF/jfs Attachments: Applicant's Letter of Request Exhibit "A" - Chronology of the Application Exhibit "B" - Site and Surrounding Land Use Exhibit "C" - City's Approved Site Plan Exhibit "D" - Site Plan Showing Non-Compliance Exhibit "E" - Site Plan Showing 5-Foot Setback Resolution of Denial City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Dept 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA. 91730 Re: Variance (Silva) To whom it may concern: I'll try to sum up the situation as best I can. When we first pulled permits we knew we could only go 5'feet to the property line but we explained our situation (along with our concrete contractor) to someone in the building department and were given the ok to go to the property line. We had to make some changes though and that included a complete outside wall with stucco and hot mop the roof and slightly slopeit. The inspector came out and ok'd the slab and' roof but now our file can not be located and we'd like to finish. We are filing for the variance for several reasons. One is that most of the work is completed and we would hate to take it down. Second, we were ok'd at one point but the paper work can not be found. Third is we need the extra area to back in the boat. We are hindered by a light post, edison underground opening and cable boxes in the front of the area where we start our approach. With the post of the overhang we can not back it in with the 5'foot ruling. The fourth reason being we would like to keep the boat covered to protect it from the harsh weather and last reason is we are not able to put it in the garage because of it's length. We would like your approval so that we may keep our neighborhood looking neat and clean and not have it exposed it to the front. If you should have any questions to this regards we ask that you give Dave or I. a call at (714) 944-6881. Sincer~'ly, Ta R. TRS/ts EXHIBIT A CHRONOLOGY FOR VA 92-02 April 5, 1989 · Building permits approved and signed off by Planning for the patio cover in the rear yard and the carport in the side yard. The approved plans showed a notation of 5 feet setback from the property line. April 10, 1989 · Building inspection on the footings for the patio and the carport. July 1, 1989 · Building inspection with corrections. July 18, 1990 · A note on the Building correction notice that the applicant will be requesting for an extension of time for the building permit. January 23, 1991 · A note on the Building correction notice that the applicant needs Planning Department approval for the property line clearance. July 23, 1991 · Building permits for the carport and the patio has expired. January 9, 1992 · Building conducted routine site inspection and noticed that the patio and the carport are constructed. February 4, 1992 · Applicant met with the City Planner to discuss the issue of the constructed carport being 6 inches from the property line. May 13, 1992 · Applicant submitted a Variance application for the encroachment into the required interior side yard. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING VARIANCE NO. 92-02 TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED INTERIOR SIDE YARD SETBACK FROM 5 FEET TO 6 INCHES FROM THE PROPERTY LINE FOR A SINGLE FAMILY HOME IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED AT 10077 IRONWOOD STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1077-041-64 A. Recitals. (i) David R. and Tamalyn R. Silva have filed an application for the issuance of Variance No. 92-02 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Variance request is referred to as "the application." (ii) On the 22nd day of July 1992, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on July 22, 1992, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at 10077 Ironwood Street with a street frontage of 78 feet and lot depth of 112 feet and is presently improved with a single family home; and (b) The properties to the north, south, east, and west of the subject site are single family homes; and (c) The applicant has constructed a carport inconsistent with the approved plans; and (d) The carport structure is setback only 6 inches from the property line and the required setback is 5 feet per Section 17.08,060A.d; and (e) The site is a typical rectangular single family lot. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. VAR 92-02 - SILVA July 22, 1992 Page 2 (a} That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulations would not result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the Development Code. (b) That there are not exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same district. (c) That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would not deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district. (d) That the granting of the Variance will constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district. (e) That the granting of the Variance will be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby denies the application. 5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF JULY 1992. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22nd day of July 1992, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT , DATE: July 22, 1992 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: 8teven Ross, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 92-19 - ATCO STRUCTURES, INC. - The request to establish a Heavy Equipment Sales and Rentals operation on 10.37 acres of land in the Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial district (Subarea 9) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, located at 10807 Jersey Boulevard - APN: 209-143-08. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested by Applicant: Approval of a non-construction Conditional Use Permit to allow the storage, rental, and sale of modular office units within the Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial District and issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. Applicable .Regulations: The Industrial Area Specific Plan allows Heavy Equipment Sales and Rental operations within Subarea 9 subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. C. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning.: North - Manufacturing; Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial and General Industrial, Industrial Area Specific Plan, Subareas 9 and 8, respectively South - Railroad and manufacturing; General Industrial, Industrial Area Specific Plan, Subarea 10 East - Vacant; Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial, Industrial Area Specific Plan, Subarea 9 West - Manufacturing; Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial, Industrial Area Specific Plan, Subarea 9 D. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial North - Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial and General Industrial South - General Industrial East - Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial West - Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial E. Site Characteristics: The 10-acre site contains a 7,400 square foot office and a paved employee parking area adjacent to the street. Several trees are located around the building and parking area. The remainder of the site is ITEM C PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 92-19 - ATCO STRUCTURES July 22, 1992 Page 2 covered with gravel and was previously used for truck storage- A small shed is located south of the building and a chain link perimeter fence surrounds the site. F. Parking Calculations: Number of Number of Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces of Use Foota~e Ratio Required Provided Office 7,400 1/250 30 30 ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicant is proposing to utilize the site as the corporate head office for operations in the western U.S.A., as well as the district office and storage facility for the sale and rental of mobile and modular office units. Corporate offices will be located in the existing 7,400 square foot building, while the modular units will be stored in the large lot behind the building- B. Compatibilit~ of Uses: Subarea 9 is zoned for Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial activities such as manufacturing; wholesale, storage, and distribution; fleet storage; building equipment and supplies; and repair services- To the west is a pallet manufacturing company and south of the site are railroad tracks and warehousing operations- The land to the east is vacant and on the north side of Jersey Boulevard are some small manufacturing operations- Given that the primary use of the site is storage with ancillary offices, it does not appear that any land use compatibility problems could arise as a result of the proposed use. C. Histor~ of the Site: The current property owner, Commercial Carriers, applied for a Minor Development Review in 1987 to expand the parking lot and construct a new driveway for an existing automobile distributing business. The City Planner approved the request with conditions requiring the applicant to upgrade the site to comply with current development standards, including the installation of landscaping within the required 35-foot streetscape setback- Commercial Carriers appealed all the conditions of approval but the appeal was denied by both the Planning Commission and City Council, thereby upholding the City Planner's original conditions of approval- The proposal submitted by Atco Structures complies with the development standards of the Industrial Area Specific Plan and the Development Code- The conditions of approval for the project are consistent with those previously required of the Commercial Carriers proposal. D. Upgrading of the Site: The site was originally developed prior to incorporation of the City and does not comply with current development standards. Therefore, it should be upgraded to bring it into conformance with the minimum requirements of the district. The existing parking area and PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 92-19 - ATCO STRUCTURES July 22, 1992 Page 3 drive approaches are to be replaced with landscaping within the required streetscape setback area and a new parking lot and access drive for the storage area is proposed to be constructed west of the building. In addition, a meandering sidewalk, street lights, and street trees will be required. E. Environmental Assessment: Upon review of Part I, the Initial StudyI and completion of Part II of the Environmental Checklist, staff has found no significant impacts related to the proposed use- It will be necessary to remove several of the trees along Jersey Boulevard to construct the new parking lot and drive approaches- A Tree Removal Permit will be required when a grading plan is submitted showing which trees will be impacted by the required improvements- FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The Commission must make all of the following findings in order to approve this application: A. That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the Industrial Area Specific Plan subarea in which the site is located. B. That the proposed use will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity · C. That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Industrial Area Specific Plan- CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property has been posted, and notices were sent to the adjacent property owners within 300 feet of the project. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Conditional Use Permit 92-19 through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval and issuance of a Negative Declaration. Respe lly submitted, ller BB: SR/jfs Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Letter from Applicant Exhibit "B" - Location Map Exhibit "C" - Site Plan - Existing Exhibit "D" - Site Plan - Proposed Exhibit "E" - Landscape Plan Exhibit "F" - Floor Plan Resolution of Approval May 8, 1992 City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 REF: Non-Construction - C.U.P. Attn: Nancy Fon9 Senior Planner As part of our application for a non-construction conditional use permit, this letter serves to describe our proposed use and business operation. ATCO Structures Inc. has entered into an agreement with Commercial Carriers Inc. to purchase the subject property described as (legal) portion of SW 1/4 SEC 12 TP1S R7W, {assessors parcel number} 209 143 08, (address) 10807 Jersey Boulevard, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729. The purchase agreement is subject to our ability to obtain a non-construction conditional use permit from the City of Rancho Cucamonga which will allow ATCO to make the required public and on-site improvements in a timely and cost-effective manner. The operation which ATCO Structures Inc., and its division - ATCO Space Rentals, wish to relocate from Ontario, CA to the subject location in Rancho Cucamonga is described as follows: ATCO Structures Inc. is a U.S. subsidiary of ATCO Ltd., one of Canada's largest corporations, with assets exceeding $3.7 billion and annual revenues of $1.5 billion. (Please refer to enclosed annual reports for fiscal years 1990 and 1991.) Page 2 May 8, 1992 Nancy Fong The corporate head office of ATCO Structures Inc., which would be located in the existing building at the Rancho Cucamonga property, is responsible for and manages the operations of six districts in western U.S.A. These districts are located in Seattle, Washington; Denver, Colorado; Phoenix, Arizona; Sacramento, CA; San Diego, CA; and Ontario, CA (which would be relocated to Rancho Cucamonga, as well). ATCO employs over 60 people in total at these locations. Please see attached brochure for description of our product and business. Our proposed operation in Rancho Cucamonga consists of the following: - Corporate Head Office - 7 employees manage and provide accounting, computer and human resources administration and support to six operating districts in western U.S.A. Hours of operation are 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 P.m., Monday to Friday. Please see office floor plan attached. - District Office - 15 employees are responsible for sales, rentals, service and administration of our product lines in the Southern California marketplace. Hours of operation are 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday to Friday. - The yard will be utilized for storage of units in our lease fleet which are available for rent to our clients. These units are not manufactured by ATCO, and this site will not be used as a manufacturing facility. Our product is purchased from manufacturers located throughout Southern California; only minor renovations and repairs and maintenance work will be performed at our site. This work would consist of sweep and clean units, repair windows and doors, fix flat tires, repair flooring, etc. Page 3 May 8, 1992 Nancy Fong We wish to relocate from Ontario to Rancho Cucamonga for the following reasons: - Accessibility -- near 1-10 and 1-15. - City of Rancho Cucamonga better reflects the dynamic and quality image we wish to portray our market place. - More suitable and safe working conditions for our employees. - Rancho Cucamonga provides better opportunities to become a world-class corporate citizen. - Property better suits our needs. We are looking forward to working closely with the City of Rancho Cucamonga to satisfy the needs of both parties. To that end, if there is any additional information you require to help make the C.U.P. process work more efficiently, please contact me for an immediate response. r 3y, RP/mm il ~XHt~IT "E " RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 92-19 TO ALLOW HEAVY EQUIPMENT SALES AND RENTALS WITHIN A 7,400 SQUARE FOOT BUILDING ON 10.37 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED AT 10807 JERSEY BOULEVARD IN THE MINIMUM IMPACT HEAVY INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT, SUBAREA 9, OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 209-171-38. A. Recitals. (i) Atco Structures, Inc., has filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use Permit No. 92-19 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application." (ii) On the 22nd day of July 1992, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on July 22, 1992, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at 10807 Jersey Boulevard with a street frontage of 526 feet and lot depth of 896 feet and is presently improved with a 7,400 square foot office building with a parking lot and landscaping; and (b) The properties to the north of the subject site contain small manufacturing buildings, the property to the south consists of railroad tracts and a manufacturing building, the property to the east is vacant, and the property to the west is a manufacturing operation. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 92-19 - ATCO STRUCTURES July 22, 1992 Page 2 (a} That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. (b) That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. (c) That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planninq Division 1) Occupancy of the site shall not commence until a phasing plan with a completion schedule for all site improvements has been received and approved by the City Planner and the city Engineer. 2) A Tree Removal Permit shall be obtained prior to the issuance of any permits. All heritage trees to be removed shall be replaced per Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 19.08,100. 3) An outdoor employee eating area shall be constructed, to the satisfaction of the City Planner, along the south side of the office building. Detailed plans shall be submitted, within 60 days of this approval, which indicate the appropriate amenities, such as tables, chairs/benches, and landscaping. 4) A solid, decorative screen wall, 8 feet in height, shall be installed to screen the storage area (rather than the wrought iron fence on top of a 3-foot block wall). 5) Rolling gates shall be view obstructing. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 92-19 - ATCO STRUCTURES July 22, 1992 Page 3 Enqineerinq Division 1) The westerly drive approach shall align with the existing driveway on the north side of Jersey Boulevard. The east edge of the easterly driveway shall be located at least 100 feet from a projection of the Red Oak Avenue BCR. 2)All existing drive approaches shall be removed and replaced with curb and gutter. 3) Jersey Boulevard shall be posted "no parking." 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF JULY 1992. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY- Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Bullet, Secretary I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22nd day of July 1992, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLICANT: Those items checked are Conditions of Approval. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (714) 989-1861, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. TIme Limits com,z~io, 1. Approval shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, ff building permits are / / not issued or approved use has not commenced within 24 months from the date of approval. 2. Development/Design Review shall be approved prior to / / , / / 3. Approval of Tentative Tract No. is granted subject to the approval of / / 4. The developer shall commence, participate in, and consummate or cause to be commenced, / / participated in, or consummated, a Mello-Roos Community Fadlitles District (CFD) for the Rancho Cucarnonga Fire Protection District to finance construction and/or maintenance of a fire station to serve the development. The station shall be located, designed, and built to all specifications of the Rancho Cucarnonga Fire Protection District, and shall become the Districrs property upon completion. The equipment shall be selected by the District in accordance with its needs. In any building of a station, the developer shall comply with all applicable laws and regulations. The CFD shall be formed by the District and the developer by the time recordation of the final map occurs. 5. Prior to recordation of the final map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes / / first. the applicant shall consent to, or participate in, the establishment of a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District for the construction and maintenance of necessary school facilities. However, if any school district has previously established such a Community Facilities District, the applicant shall, in the alternative, consent to the annexation of the project site into the territory of such existing District prior to the recordation of the final map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes first. Further, ff the affected school district has not formed a Melio-Roos Community Facilities District within twelve months from the date of approval of the project and prior to the recordation of the final map or issuance of building permits for said project, this conditio, n shall be deemed null and void. SC - 2/9! ! o1' !2 pm~ ,~o.: CUt e2-1 q This Condition shall be waived if the City receives notice that the applicant and all affected school districts have entered into an agreement to privately accommodate any and all school impacts as a result of this project. 6. Prior to recordation of the final map or prior to issuance of building permits when no map is / / involved, written certification from the affected water district that adequate sewer and water facilities are or will be available to serve the proposed project shall be sul~mitted to the Department of Community Development. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to fi hal map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. B. SIte Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the appmved plans which / / include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Developrnent Code regulations, and I~(us/~'°'4,( Jl?',,. .Specific Plan and -- Planned Community. I//' 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all / / Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 3. OccupancyofthefacilltyshallnotcommenceuntilsuchtirneasallUniformBuildingCodeand / /---- State Fire Marshairs regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucarnonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division to show compliance. The building shall be inspected for compliance pdor to occupancy. v'/ 4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be / /__ submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. v/ 5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for / / consistency pdor to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment building, etc.), or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or aiDproved use has commenced, whichever comes first. v/~ 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development / / Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community Plans or Specific Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. v'/ 7. A detailed on-site lighting plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner and .l / Sheritf's Department (989-6611 ) pdor to the issuance of building permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, Iocmion, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent proparties. 8. If no centralized trash receptacles am provided, all trash pick-up shall be for individual units / / with all receptacles shielded from public view. t.-'/' 9. Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations / / and the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to City Planner review and approval pdor to issuance of building permits. t./ 10. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall / -/ be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner. SC - 2/91 2of 12~__~/~:::~ 11, Street names shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with / / the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map. 12. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, / ....J including proper illumination. 13. A detailed plan indicating trail widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing, and / / weed control, in accordance with City Master Trail drawings, shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to approval and recordation of the Final Tract Map and prior to approval of street improvement and grading plans. Developer shall upgrade and construct all trails, including fencing and drainage devices, in conjunction with street improvements. 14. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs) shall not prohibit the keeping of equine / / animals where zoning requirements forthe keeping of said animals have been met. Individual lot owners in subdivisions shall have the option of keeping said animals without the necessity of appealing to boards of directors or homeowners' associations for amendments to the CC&Rs. 15. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the / / Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Divisions and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer. 16. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property / / owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 17. Solar access easements shall be dedicated for the purpose of assuming that each lot or / / dwelling unit shall have the right to receive sunlight across adjacent lots or units for use of a solar energy system. The easements may be contained in a Declaration of Restrictions for the subdivision which shall be recorded concurrently with the recordation of the linal map or issuance of permits, whichever comes first. The easements shall prohibit the casting of shadows by vegetation, structures, fixtures or any other object, except for utility wires and similar objects, pursuant to Development Code Section 17.08.060-G-2. 18. The project contains a designated Historical Landmark. The site shall be developed and / / maintained in accordance with the Historic Landmark Alteration Permit No. · Any further modifications to the site including, but not limited to, extedor alterations and/or interior alterations which affect the exterior of the buildings or structures, removal of landmark trees, demolition, reiocation, reconstruction of buildings or structures, or changes to the site shall require a modification to the Historic Landmark Alteration Permit subject to Historic Preservation Commission review and approval. C. Building Design 1. An alternative energy system is required to provide domestic hot water for all dwelling units / / and for heating any swimming pool or spa, unless other alternative energy systems are demonstrated to be of equivalent capacity and efficiency. All swimming pools installed at the time of initial development shall be sul:~lemented with solar heating. Details shall be included in the building plans and shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. All dwellings shall have the front, side and rear elevations upgraded with architectural / treatment, detailing and increased delineation of sudace treatment subject to City Planner review and approval pdor to issuance ol building permits. SC-2/91 3of12 ~___~//~ P,~i~, ,','9.: CUP~t2"Jq 3. Standard patio cover plans for use by the Homeowners' Association shall be submitted for / / City Planner and Building Official review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. V'/4. All roof appurtenances, including air conditionere and other roof mounted equipment and/or / / projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Division. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Details shall be included in building plans. D. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall / / ' contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curb}. 2. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be / / provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/bu iidings with open spaces/ plazas/recreational uses. V//' 3 . All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, / / entrances, and exits shall be stdped per City standards. 4. All units shall be provided with garage door openers if driveways are less than 18 feet in / / depth from back of sidewalk. 5. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions shall restrict the storage of recreational vehicles · / on this site unless they are the principal source of transportation for the owner and prohibit parking on interior circulation aisles other than in designated visitor perking areas. V/' 6. Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the City Planner, City Engineer, and / / Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. E. Landscaping (for publicly maintained landscape arm, refer to Section N.) v''/1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscap- / / ing in the case of residential development, shell be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lit subdivision. 2. Existing trees required to be preserved in place shell be protected with a construction larder / / in accordance with the Municipal Code Section 19.08.110, and so noted on the grading plans. The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new licatlone for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape pins. The applicant shall folliw all of the arborisrs recomrnenclatlins regarding preservation, transplanting and tdmming methods. 3. Aminimumof treespergrossacre,cornpdsedofthefollowingsizes, shalllaProvided / /- within the project: % - 48- inch box or larger, % - 36- inch box or larger, __ % - 24- inch box or larger, __ % - 15-gallon, and __ % - 5 gallon. 4. A minimum of % of trees planted within the project shall be specimen size trees - / / 24-inch box or larger. V/5. Within parking fits, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallin tree for every three /__J_ parking stalls, sufficient to shade 50% of the perking area at solar noon on August 21. 5C - 2/91 4o~12 ~_~/~ 6. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one ' tree per 30 linear feet of building. / / 7. All private slope banks 5 feet or less in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than / / 2:1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 8. AII private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:l orgreater / /.- slope shall be landscaped and inigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1 -gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sol. It. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be occupancy. 9. For single family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continu- / /-- ously maintained in a healthy and thdving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer. Prior to releasing occupancy for those u nits, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Division to determine that they are in satisfactory 10. For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are respon- / / sible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way. All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in a healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage. 11. Front yard landscaping shall be required per the Development Code and/or / / · This requirement shall be in addition to the required street trees and slope planting. 12. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be / / included in the required landscape plans and shall be subiect to City Planner review and al:~:~mval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Division. 13. Special landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, specimen size trees, meander- / /.-- ing sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensitied landscaping, is required along I 14. Landscaping and irrigation systems required Io be installed within the public right-of-way on / / the perimeler of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 15. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas / the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division. 16. Tree maintenance cdteda shall be developed and subm~ed for City Planner review and / /__ apl;m~val prior to issuance of building permits. These criteria shall encourage the natural growth charactedsfics of the selected tree species. 17. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of /.--/-- Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19.16 of the Ranct~o Cucamonga Municipal Code. 5C-2/91 5of12 ~ P~i~t .','9.:cu F. Signs 1, ThesignsindicatedonthesubmittedplansareconceptualonlyandnotaPadof thisapproval. / / Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation of any signs. 2. A Uniform Sign Program for this development shall be submitled for City Planner review and J / approval pdor to issuance of building parmRs. 3. Directory monument sign(s) shall be provided for apartment, condominium, or townhomes / / prior to occupancy and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. G. Environmental 1. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Fourth Street Rock / / Crusher project in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 2. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer wdtten notice of the City Adopted / / Special Studies Zone for the Red Hill Fault, in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 3. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Foothill Freeway / / project in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 4. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval pdor to the ../ / issuance of building permits. The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and construction techniques provided, and if appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures. The building plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report. H. Other Agencies v"' 1. Emergencysecondan/accessshallbeprovidedinaccordancewithRanchoCucamongaFire / / Protection District Standards. v' 2. Emergency access shall be provided, maintenance free and clear, a minimum of 26 feet wide / / at all times during construction in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District requirements. V' 3. Prior to issuance of building permits for combustible construction, evidence shall be / / submitted to the Ranoho Cucamonga Fire Protection District that temporan/water supply for fire protection is available, pending completion of required fire protection system. v"" 4. The applicant shall contact the U. S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and / location of mail boxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mail boxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mail boxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. For projects using septic tank facilities, written certification of acceptability, including all / -/ supportive information, shall be obtained from the San Bemardino County Department of Environmental Health and submitted to the Building Official prior to the issuance of Septic Tank Permits, and prior to issuance of building permits. 5C-2/91 6or12 APPLICANTS SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (714) g8g-18&3, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: I. Site Development 1. The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Cede, Uniform Mechani- / /-- cal Cede, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Eleclric Code, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of issuance of relative permits. Please contact the Building and Safety Division for copies of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential dwelling unit(s) or major addition / / to existing unit(s), the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rote. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: City Beautffication Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Systems Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fees. ~" 3. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development or / / addition to an existing development, the applicant shell pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: Systems Development Fee, Drainage Fee, School Fees, Permit and Plan Checking Fees. 4. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building Official, aftertract/parcel map recordation and prior to issuance of building berrnits. J, Existing Structures v/' 1. Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code for the property line clearances / / considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness of existing buildings. I// 2. Existing buildings shall be made to comply with correct building and zoning regulations for / / the intended use or the building shall be demolished. 3. Existing sewage disposal radiities shall be removed, filled and/or capped to comply with the / / Uniform Plumbing Code and Uniform Building Code. 4. Underground on-site utilities are to be located and shown on building plans submitted for / building parrnit application. K. Grading v/' 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City / Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the appmved grading logan. · 2. A soils report shell be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to J /'- perform such work. I,,-" 3. The development is located within the soil erosion control boundaries; a Soil Disturbance / /- Permit is required. Please contact San Bernardino County Department of Agriculture at (714) 387-2111 for permit application. Documentation of such permit shall be submitted to the City prior to the issuance of rough grading permit. 4. A geological repeal shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at / / the time of application for grading plan check. v"/5. The final grading plans shall be completed and aLpproved prior to issuance of building permits. / /-- SC - 2/91 70f|2 6. As a custom-lit sulxlivislin, the following requirements shall be met: a. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed guaranteeing completion of all on-site / / drainage facilities necessary for dewatedng all parcels to the satisfaction of the Building and Safely Division priorto final map apC~mval and priorto the issuance of grading permits. b. Appropdafe easements for safe disposal of drainage water that are conducted onto / / or over adjacent parcels. am to be delineated and recorded to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Division prior to issuance of grading and building permits. c. On-site drainage improvements, necessary for dewatedng and protecting the subdivided / /- properties, are to be installed prior to issuance of building permits for constructtin upon any parcel that may be subject to drainage flows entering, leaving, or within a parcel relative to which a building permit is requested. d. Final grading plans for each parcel are to be submitted to the Building and Safety / / Division for approval priorto issuance of building and grading permits. (This may be on an incremental or cornl:x}site basis.) e. All slipe banks in excess of 5 feet in vertical height shall be seeded with native grasses / / or planted with ground cover for erosion control upon corn;4etion of grading or some other alternative method of erosion control shall be coffq)iled to the satisfaction of the Building Official. In addition a permanent irrigation system shall be provided. This requirement does not release the applicam/developer from compliance with the slope plaming requirements of Section 17.08.040 1 of the Development Code. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DNISION, (714) 98&.1862, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: L Dedication and Vehicular Access 1. Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for al interior public streets community trails, public paseos, public ~ meal, street trees, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. Fhtvate easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, k:t.,al feeder trails, etc.) 8ttil be reserved as shown on me plans and/or tentative map. V/f' 2. Dedication shall be made of the folowing rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street comedine): /-/(/J total feet on ~ total feet on total feet on total foot on 3. An irrevocable offer of dedlcalion for. -foot wide roadway easemere; shall be made for all private strum or drive. 4. Non-vehicular access shal be dedicated to the City for the following streets:. 5. Reciprocal accese easements shall be pmvide:l, ensurtngaccesstoallParcels tW CC&Rs /--/ or I:ry aleode and sham be recorded concurrently with the map or prtor to the issuance of building permits, where no map is involved. SC - 2/9 1 8 ol' 12 ~________/,~ ~ 6. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall I~e delineated or noted on the final map. / / 7. The final map shall clearly delineate a 1 O-foot minimum building restriction area on the / / neighboring lot adjoining the zero lot line wall and contain the following language: 'l/We hereby dedicate to the City of Rancho Cucarnonga the right to prohibit the construction of (residential) buildings (or other structures) within those areas designated on the map as building restriction areas. ° A maintenance agreement shall also be granted from each lot to the adjacent lot through the CC&R's. V/' 8. All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shell be quitclaimed ee4e4k~ee~, / / V"" 9. Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of-way / / shall be dedicated to the City wherever they encroach onto private property. 10. Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right tum lanes. to provide a minimum / of 7 feet rneasurad from the face of curbs. ff curt) adjacent sidewalk is used along the right turn lane, a parNil street tree maintenance easement shall be ~. 11.Thec~evelopershe~~makeag~~dfaithe~~rtt~acquiretherequired~~-s~tepr~pertyinterests / '/ necessary to construct the required public impfovernents, and If he/she should fail to do ,so. the developer shall, at least 120 days prior to submittal of the finn map for approval, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Government Code Section 66462 at such time as the City aoqu ires the property interests required for the improveme nts. Such agreement shall provide for payment by the developer of all costs incurred by the City to acquire the off-site property interests required in connection with the subdivision. Security for a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an aplxaisal report obtained by the developer, at clevek:q3ef's cost. The aplxaiser shall have been approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal. M. Street Improvements 1. All public irnlxovements (interior sheen, drainage factlies, commurdly trail paseos, / / landscaped areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Stare. Interior street inlxovements shall inckade, Ix,'t are not llrrdted to, cufo and gutter, AC pavement, drive aplxoaches, sidewaks, street lights, and street tree. 2. A rninirnum of 26- foot wide pavement, willlt 140 -loot wide dedicated right-of-way shall be / / constructed for NI hail-section streets. V"/3. Construct the fogowing perkhater street imrxovements including, I:xat not limited to: / /__ SC-2/91 9of12 J-/~u~ Comptcuon Date: Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement reCOnStructiOn and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, side- walk shall be curvilinear per STD, 304. (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item. V//4. Improvement plans and constructiOn: a. Street improvement plans including street trees and street lights, Fired by a regis- / / tered Civil Engineer, shall be sut}mitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfactiOn of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion ol the public and/or pdvate street improve- ments, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being pedormed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a / / constructiOn permit shall be o~ained from the City Engineers Office in additiOn to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffiO, street name slgrdng, and Interconnect conduit / / shall be installed Io the satisfactiOn of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed on any new constmotion or reconstructiOn / / of major, secondary or collector streets which intersect with other major, secondary or collector streets for future traffic sigma. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides ot the street at 3 feet outside Ot BC R, EC R or any other IocliOns al:)lxoved by the City Engineer. Note: '/ /-- (1) All pull boxes shall be No. 6 unless otherwise spedlied by the City Engineer. (2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanize steel with pullrope. / / e. Wheel chair rarnl~ shall be Installed on al four comere ot intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiting conslnaction shal remain open I0 traffic al al times with / / adequate detours dudrag construction. A sUeet closure petrol may be required. A cash deposit shall be provide tocovertttecomolgmdingmxlPavtng, whichstWlbe refunded ul3on complellon of the ¢OrtmruotiOn tO rite satMe ol the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows ~al not ¢roo sidewat=. Under sidewat drains shall be / / installed Io CMy SlaM, excel for single larnily Iota. ft. Handicap access ramp deign sham be as spedtied by the CIy Engirmef. / / i. Street rmmes shall be approved by the CItY Pimmf Pdor to sulxnllal for ~rst Ptan check. / 5. Street enWOvemmM plans per Cily Standaerie fro' al palvale streets shall be provided for//- review and approval by lhe City Engineer. Prior Io any work being perlofmed on the pri- vate streets, fees shall be Mid and constation permits stma be obtained trom the Engineers Office in addllion to any other permits required. V/' 6. Slreet trees, a minimum of 15-.gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in , __. . ~/-- accon:tance with the City's street tree mo0ram. ,5C-2/91 lOof12 7. Intersection line of site designs shill be reviewed by the City Engineer for conlormance with adopted policy. / / a. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, / / including driveways. Walls, signs, and slopes shall be located outside the lines of sight. Landscaping and other obstructions within the lines of sight shall be approved by the City Engineer. b. Local residential street intersections shall have their noticeability improved, usually by / / moving the 2 +/- closest street trees on each side awayfromthe street and placed in a street tree easement. 8. A permit shall be obtained from CALTRANS for any work within the following right-of-way: / / 9. All public improvements on the foliowing streets shall be operationally corn;4ete pdor to the / issuance of building permits: N. Public Maintenance MIll 1. A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards / / shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. The following landscape parkways, medians, paSs}s, easements, trails, or other area are required to be aRnexed into the Landscape Maintenance Olstrk=: ~ 2. Asignedconsentandwalverformtojotnand/orformtheapproprtateLandscapeandLighting / / Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer priorto final rnip approval or issuance of building permits whichever _oc~_jrs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 3. All required public lart~ and irrigation systems shall be continuously maintained by the I / developer until accepted by the City. 4. Parkway landscaping on the lollowing street(s) sl'mll carlera to the remJs of the respective / / Beautiticatlon Master Plan: .... -- O. Dralrmge and Flood Control .. · · 1. The project (or portior~ thereof) is located within a Flood Hazard Zone; therefore, flood / protectio~ me~urea ~ be ~ M certified by a reglsterM Clvtl Engtrmer and apl:~ved by I~ Cily Engimmr. 2. It shall be the developers responsibility to have the current FIRM Zone __J designation removecl from the project area. The developere engineer shall prepare all necessary raparm, pare, and hy~llC calculmionL A Cortclllional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) shall be olatalned from FEMA prior to final map al:groval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. A Letter of Map Revision {LOMR) 1hall be issued by FEMA prior to occupancy or improvement acceptance, whichever oocurs first. 3. A final drainage study shall be submitled to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. NI drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the C~ Engineer. SC - 2/91 t I o1' 12 (~4~ '~ 4. A pe~ from the ~u~ F~ Commi Dist~ is r~uimd for wo~ w~hin ~s~ht~t-way. / J 5. Trees are pmhib~ w~hin 5 feet of the outs~e dia~ter of any publ~ slo~ drain pi~ measur~ from the outer ~e ol a mature tree trunk. / / 6. Public ~o~ d~in easemems shall ~ grad~ to ~ey oveffl~s in t~ evem ot a / / b~age in a su~ ~tch basin on the ~bl~ street. P. Utilities 1. Pmv~e ~parae utili~ se~es to each pa~l i~di~ ~n~a~ s~erage sy~em, water, / / gas, el~ ~wer, telep~ne, a~ ~ ~ (all u~e~mund) in a~rd~e w~ me Util~ Sta~ards. Easemem8 shall ~ pmv~ as r~ir~. ~ 2. ~e deve~r shall ~ res~nsible for the milan of ex~i~ ~ilR~s ~ ne~a~. / / ~ 3. Water a~ s~er p~ns s~ll ~ des~n~ a~ ~n~ed to me~ ~e r~ireme~s ol the / /-- Cu~m~ ~u~ Water Di~ (CCWD), Ra~ C~m~a Fire Pmt~n Dist~, a~ t~ En~mnmemal HeaRh De~n~m of t~ ~ of San Bedim. A i~er of ~li~e from t~ CCWD is r~i~ ~r to final ~ ~v~ or ~e ol ~Rs, whoever ~ li~. Q. General Requirements and ApprovaLs / / 1. The separate parcels contained within the project boundaries shall be legally combined into one parcel I:H~Or tO issuance of building permits. V 2. A~ easement for a joint use driveway stall be provided I:H~Or tO final map al:q:)mval or / / .. issuance of building parrnits, whichever _o,'~,~__,rs first, for: -~,-~_ ', ' I .-. _../ / 3. Prior Io approval ot the final map a deposit shill be polled with the Cily covering lhe estimaled cosl ot allorltoning the a~ssrner~ under ~ Dilrla among the newly a'ealed panels, 4. Etiwanda/$an ,Sevairl Area Regional Manline, Secondly-Regla~ll, and MIller Plan / 1 Drainage Feel 11~111 be I:lld prior Io finn map ~vll or Ixlor Io buildirlg perroll lance it no map is involved, S. Permill shall De ol3llild tfonl file lollowing agentill tor work wilJlirl Iblir dglll-ot-way: I / 6. A signed consent and waiver fo~m to Join and/or form the Law Erdaam Community / / Fadlilies District shal be flied with the City Engineer pd~ to final map al~N'ovaJ or the issuance ol I::=jllding permits. whichever occurs first. Foffnalion costs shag be borne by the Developer. 7. Prior to finallzation of any development phase, sufficient improvehaft plans shall be com- / /- pieted beyond trm ~ boundaries tO assure seconda~/access and drainage protection to the satisfaction ol the City Engineer. Phase Icx~undaries shal correspond to lot lines shown ot~ the al3xoved tealive map. SC-2/91 12of12 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 22, 1992 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Scott Murphy, Associate Planner SUBJECT: MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 85-04 - ETIWANDA HISTORICAL SOCIETY/CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to construct a 2,500 square foot barn on the Chaffey-Garcia site to be used as a museum and caretaker's residence on a 1 acre site in the Low-Medium Residential designation (4-8 dwelling units per acre) of the Victoria Planned Community, located on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue, north of Base Line Road - APN: 227-513-05. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Rec~uested by Applicant: Approval of Site Plan, Landscape Plan, and Building Elevations. B. Surroundin~ Land Use and Zoning: North - Church; Victoria Planned Community, Low-Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) South - Single Family Residential; Victoria Planned Community, Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) East - Vacant; Etiwanda Specific Plan, Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) West - Single Family Residential; Victoria Planned Community, Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) C. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) North - Low Residential South - Low Residential East - Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) West - Medium-Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) D. Site Characteristics: The site presently contains the Chaffey- Garcia House, a gravel parking area, several mature trees along the street, and relatively young trees along the south and west boundaries. ITEM D PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 85-04 - ETIWANDA HISTORICAL SOCIETY July 22, 1992 Page 2 ANALYSIS: A. Background: In 1984, the City designated the Chaffey-Garcia House as a local landmark, to commemorate the achievements and accomplishments of the Chaffey brothers and the impact they had on the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Because of impending development in the area of the original site, however, a suitable site had to be found for the house relocation. After some searching, a lot in Etiwanda was donated to the City by the William Lyon Company for the relocation and the house was donated to the City by Lewis Homes. Prior to the relocation of the house, the City and the Etiwanda Historical Society entered into an agreement that would allow for the restoration of the house and its use as a museum to display artifacts and memorabilia- The agreement allows the Society to complete improvements as funds become available. A condition of the agreement requires the final barn plans to be approved by the City Council. As a result, the Commission's action will be in the form of a recommendation to the City Council. On February 27, 1985, Planning Commission originally approved Conditional Use Permit 85-04 for the relocation of the Chaffey- Garcia house from its location at East and Sun~ait Avenues to its current location on Etiwanda Avenue. In addition to the relocation of the house, the Planning Commission also approved a Master Plan for the site providing for the future construction of a barn on the western half of the property- B- General: While the Commission did approve the Master Plan for the future barn construction, the specific design of the barn was not available for review- Partially because of the $100,000.00 contribution by Foothill Marketplace Partners (Wattson Company), adequate funds are now available for the barn construction. As a result, the final design of the barn is now being submitted for consideration. The construction of the 2,500 square foot barn will provide a site that is consistent with the original site on which the Chaffey-Garcia House was located, thereby reinforcing the historic character of the house. Further, the barn design is consistent with the character of the original barn. Additionally, landscaping (citrus trees, grapevines, etc.) will be installed to reinforce the agricultural roots of the community- The one bedroom residential unit on the upper floor of the barn will be used as a caretaker's residence to provide security for the site. C. Design Review Committee Comments: The Design Review Committee (McNeil, Chitiea, Coleman) reviewed the proposal on June 18, 1992. At that time, the Committee recommended approval of the project subject to the following comments: 1. The use of chain link fencing with oleanders was acceptable along the south side of the parking lot. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 85-04 - ETIWANDA HISTORICAL SOCIETY July 22, 1992 Page 3 2. The doors on the south elevation, should receive a decorative finish, such as'applying a 1-inch x 12-inch board on the door with 1-inch x 8-inch surrounds to match doors on the other three elevations- 3. A security gate should be provided at the bottom entrance to the stairs. D. Environmental Assessment: Conditional Use Permit 85-04 was originally approved by the Planning Commission on February 27, 1985, and a Negative Declaration was issued for the project. As part of this approval, plans for the barn at the rear of the property were considered in approving a master plan for the site. Because the application was in substantial conformance with the master plan, the Negative Declaration issued for the original Conditional Use Permit adequately addressed the environmental impacts of the project. Therefore, no additional environmental assessment is required. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The project is consistent with the General Plan, the Development Code, and the Victoria Planned Community- The project will not be detrimental to adjacent properties or cause significant adverse environmental impacts. In addition, the proposed use and site plan, together with the recommended conditions of approval, are in compliance with all applicable provisions of the Victoria Planned Community, the Development Code, and City standards. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin as a Public Hearing, notices were sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the site, and the site was posted. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the Modification to Conditional Use Permit 85-04 to the City Council through adoption of the attached Resolution. Pep~la~ BB: SM: js Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Landscape Plan Exhibit "D" - Building Elevations Resolution Recommending Approval 3rlNC3AV VQNVMI J. C3 t '3N:] ',~LFIO~!D NDIS'3(i f II| j i RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 85-04, A REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT A 2,500 SQUARE FOOT BARN AND CARETAKER'S UNIT LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ETIWANDA AVENUE, NORTH OF BASE LINE ROAD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227-513-05. A. Recitals. (i) The City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Etiwanda Historic Society have filed an application for approval of a modification to Conditional Use Permit 85-04 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit Modification request is referred to as "the application." (ii) On November 8, 1984, the City Council entered into an agreement with the Etiwanda Historical Society for the relocation of the Chaffey-Garcia house to its present location. This agreement requires plans to be reviewed and approved by the City Council prior to approval of working drawings. (iii) On February 25, 1985, the Planning Commission approved the Master Plan and Phase 1 plans for the relocation of the Chaffey-Garcia house and the future construction of the barn. (iv) On the 22nd day of July 1992, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (v) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Co. Mission during the above-referenced public hearing on July 22, 1992, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue, north of Base Line Road with a street frontage of 198 feet and a lot depth of 220. The property is presently developed with the historic landmark Chaffey-Garcia house; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 85-04 - ETIWANDA HISTORICAL SOCIETY July 22, 1992 Page 2 (b) The property to the north is designated for residential uses and is developed with a church. The property to the south and west is designated for residential uses and is developed with single family residences. The property to the east is designated for residential uses and is vacant; and (c) The development of 2,500 square foot barn, with caretaker's unit is consistent with the Low-Medium Residential designation of the Victoria Planned Community and the provisions of the Development Code; and (d) The project will comply with all minimum standards of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Victoria Planned Community and the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. (b) That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. (c) That the proposed modification complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Victoria Planned Community and Development Code. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, a Negative Declaration was issued by this Commission on February 27, 1985. Further, this Commission finds that the application is in substantial compliance with the original approval for which the Negative Declaration was issued. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of the application to the City Council subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planninq Division: 1) The doors on the south elevation shall receive a decorative finish, such as applying 1-inch x 12-inch board on the door with 1-inch x 8-inch surrounds to match doors on the other three elevations. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 85-04 - ETIWANDA HISTORICAL SOCIETY July 22, 1992 Page 3 2) Window details shall be consistent with the era being replicated. Final plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. 3) A minimum 5-foot wide landscape planter shall be provided on the north side of the site. The final plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to installation. 4)A security gate shall be installed at the bottom entrance to the exterior stairs. 5) Pursuant to the agreement between the Etiwanda Historical Society and the City, uses such as weddings, private functions, bazaars, and commercial activities shall be subject to the policy guidelines of the City regarding the use of City facilities. Enqineerinq Division: 1) An additional 4 feet of dedication on Etiwanda Avenue (44 feet from centerline) shall be provided. 2) Parkway improvements shall be provided per the Etiwanda Specific Plan to include, but not limited to, a paved bike trail, street lights, groundcover, and irrigation system. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF JULY 1992. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22nd day of July 1992, by the following vote-to-wit: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 85-04 - ETIWANDA HISTORICAL SOCIETY July 22, 1992 Page 4 AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: SU~ECT: I APPLICANT: / LOCATION: ~/~ ~~ .. ~ ~/~ Those items che~ are ~ions of ~val. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (714) 989-1861, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDR'IONS: A. TIme Llmita 1.Approval shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Oommission, if building permits 8re not issued or approved use has not commenced within 24 months from the date of approvsl. 2. Development/Design Review shall be approved prior to / ! , 3. ApprovsI of Tentative Tract No. is granted subject to the approval of 4. The developer shall commence, participate in, and consummate or cause to be commenced, / t.-- participated in, or consummated, a Mello-Roos Community Fadlities District (CFD) for the Rancho Cucarnonga Fire Protection District to finance construction and/or maintenance of a fire station to serve the development. The station shall be located, designed, and built to all specifications of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and shall become the District's property upon completion. The equipment shall be selected by the District in accordance with its needs. In any building of a station, the developer shall comply with all applicable laws and regulations. The CFD shall be forTned by the Distdct and the developer by the time recordation ol the final map occurs. 5. Prior to recordation of the final map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes I /__ first, the applicant shall consent to, or participate in, the establishment of a Melld-Roos Community Facilities District for the construction and maintenance of necessary school facilities. However, if any school district has previously established such a Community Facilities District, the applicant shall, in the alternative, consent to the annexation of the project sile into the territory of such existing District prior to the recordation of the final map or the issuance ol building permits, whichever comes first. Further, it the affected school distrial has not formed a Melio-Roos Community Facilities District within twelve months from the date of approval of the project and prior to the recordation of the final map or issuance of building permits for said project, this condition shall be deemed null and void. SC - 2/91 1'~ / ~ This condition shall be waived if the City receives notice that the applicant and all affected school districts have entered into an agreement to privately accommodate any and all school impacts as a result of this project. 6. Prior to recordation of the final map or prior to issuance of building permits when no map is involved, written certification from the affected water district that adequate sewer and water facilities are or will be available to serve the proposed project shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development. Such letter must have been issued by the water districtwithing0dayspriortofinal mapapprovalinthecaseofsubdivisionorpriortoissuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. B. Site Development v/ 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which /-----J include site plans, architectural elevations, extedor materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, and ..Specific Plan and Planned Community. 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all / . J Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 3. Occupancy of the facility shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and · / State Fire Marshairs regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division to show compliance. The building shall be inspected for compliance pdor to occupancy. 4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be / ./ submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for ---J / consistency pdor to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.), or prior to final map approval in the case ol a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. ~/ 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development / / Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community Plans or Specific Plans in effed at the time of Building Permit issuance. 7. A detailed on-site lighting plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner and / J Sheriffs Department (989-6611 ) pdor to the issuance of building permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. v/ 8. If no centralized trash receptacles am provided, all trash pick-up shall be for individual units J J with all receptacles shielded from public view. 9. Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards. The final des,~ln, locations and the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. v/ 10. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall / /- be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or I,andscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner. sc-2/91 2 '~/~ 11. Street names sha~l be submitted for City Planner review and approva~ in accordance with .__/ / the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map. v/ 12. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, / / including proper illumination. 13. A detailed plan indicating trail widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing, and _._/ / weed control, in accordance with City Master Trail drawings, shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval priorto approval and recordation of the Final Tract Map and prior to approval of street improvement and grading plans. Developer shall upgrade and const~ct all trails, including fencing and drainage devices, in conjunction with street improvements. 14. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs) shall not prohibit the keeping of equine / /.- animals where zoning requirements forthe keeping of said animals have been met. Individual lot owners in subdivisions shall have the option of keeping said animals without the necessity of appealing to boards of directors or homeowners' associations for amendments to the CC&Rs. 15. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the / / Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Divisions and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of building permits. whichever occurs first. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer. ,/ 16. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property / / owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approval prior to issuance.of building permits. 17. Solar access easements shall be dedicated for the purpose of assuming that each lot or / / dwelling unit shall have the right to receive sunlight across adjacent lots or units for use of a solar energy system. The easements may be contained in a Declaration of Restrictions for the subdivision which shall be recorded concurrently with the recordation ol the final map or issuance of permits, whichever comes first. The easements shall prohibit the casting of shadows by vegetation, structures, fixtures or any other object, except for utility wires and similar objects, pursuant to Development Code Section 17.08.060-G-2. 18. The project contains a designated Historical Landmark. The site shall be developed and / /'- maintained in accordance with the Historic Landmark Alteration Permit No. · Any further modifications to the site including, but not limited to, extedor alterations and/or interior alterations which affect the exterior of the buildings or structures, removal ot landmark trees, demolition, relocation, reconstruction of buildings or structures, or changes to the site, shall require a modification to the Historic Landmark Alteration Permit subiect to Historic Preservation Commission review and approval. C. Building Design 1. An alternative energy system is required to provide domestic hot water for all dwelling units / / and tot heating any swimming pool or spa. unless other alternative energy systems are demonstrated to be of equivalent capacity and efficiency. All swimming pools installed at the time of initial development shall be supplemented with solar heating. Details shall be included in the building plans and shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. All dwellings shall have the lront, side and rear elevations upgraded with architectural / /~ treatment, detailing and increased delineation of sudace treatment subject to C~ Planner review and approval pdor to issuance of 'bu..~TZTrmits. SC - 2/9 1 3 Completion D~e: 3. Standard patio cover plans for use by the Homeowners' Association shall be submitted for / j City Planner and Building Official review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 4. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or /-----J · projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Division. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Details shall be included in building plans. D. Parking and Vehicular Access (Indicate details on building plans) 1. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall / / contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curo). 2. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be ---J / provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/ plazas/recreational uses. 3. All parking spaces shall be double stdped per City standards and all driveway aisles, / J entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. 4. All units shall be provided with garage door openers if driveways are less than 18 feet in / / depth from back of sidewalk. 5. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions shall restrict the storage of recreational vehicles / / on this site unless they are the principal source of transportation for the owner and prohibit parking on interior circulation aisles other than in designated visitor parking areas. 6. Plans for any security gates shall be submitled for the City Planner, City Engineer, and / / Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval pdor to issuance of building permits. E. Landscaping (for pul~llcly maintained landscape areas, refer to Section N.) 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscap- · / ing in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval priorto the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. v/ 2. Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction harder I / in accordance with the Municipal Code Section 19.08.110, and so noted on the grading plans. The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans. The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's recommendations regarding preservation. transplanting and trimming methods. 3. Aminimumof treespergrossacre,compdsedofthefollowingsizes, shall be Provided / / within the project: % - 48- inch box or larger, % - 36- inch box or larger, % - 24- inch box or larger, __ % - 15-gallon, and % - 5 gallon. 4. A minimum of % of trees planted within the project shall be specimen size trees - J J 24-inch box or larger. V' 5. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three .J__.J.__ parking stalls, sufficient to shade 50% of the parking area at solar noon on August 21. 6. Trees s~all M plam~ in areas o~ public view adjacent ~o and alon~ s~ures al a ~a~e oi one tree pe~ ~0 linea~ lee~ ol ~i~iW. / /--- 7. AIIpr~ates~pebanksSfeetorlessinven~alhe~htaMof5:l orgreaters~,butle~than / /.__ 2:1 s~, shall be, at minimum, i~at~ a~ lands~ w~h a~mpdate grou~ ~ver for ems~n ~ntml. SIo~ plami~ requir~ by this s~bn shall i~lude a pe~anem irrigat~n sy~em to ~ installed by the develo~r p~r to ~upan~. 8. AII pr~ate s~s in excessof5feet,but lessthan8 feet inven~al he~andof2:l orgreater / / slo~ shall be la~d a~ imgat~ for ems~n ~mml a~ to soften their a~ara~e as fol~ws: one 15-galbn or la~er size tree ~r each 150 ~. ft. of s~ area, 1 ~al~n or larger size shrub ~r each 100 ~. ft. of s~ area, and ~mpriate gmu~ ~ver. In a~ion, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in venial height a~ of 2:1 or greater s~pe shall al~ i~lude one 5-galen or larger size tree ~r each 250 ~. ft. of s~pe area. Trees a~ shrubs shall ~ plam~ in sta~emd clusters to ~ffen a~ va~ s~ plane. SIo~ planti~ r~uir~ by this s~ion shall i~lude a ~rmanem i~atbn system to ~ in~all~ by the develo~r pr~r to ~u~y. 9. For sidle family res~emial deve~pmem, all s~ plami~ a~ iffigatbn shall be ~minu- / / ous~ maintain~ in a hea~hy a~ thdvi~ ~itbn by the deve~r umil each i~ividual un~ is ~ ~ a~ ~upied by the ~yer. Pr~r to mleasi~ o~pa~y for t~ u n~s, an insulin shall ~ ~u~ by the Planning DMsion to dete~ine that they are in sati~a~o~ ~it~n. 10. For muRi-family res~emial and ~n-res~ential devebpme~, pm~ ownera are resin- / / sible for the ~ntinual mintena~e of all la~ap~ areas on-s~e, as well as ~miguous plam~ areas w~hin the ~bl~ r~ffi~f-way. All la~~ areas shall ~ ke~ free from we~s a~ debris a~ ~imain~ in a hea~hy a~ th~ing ~itbn, a~ shall receive regular pruning, fenil~i~, ~wi~, a~ tdmmi~. Any damaged, dead, disease, or d~aying plato material shall ~ mplac~ w~hin 30 days from the date of damage. 11. Front yard la~ing shall ~ r~ir~ ~r the Deve~p~m ~e a~/or / / . ~is r~uimmnt shall be in a~itbn to the r~uir~ street trees a~ s~ plainly. 12. The final des~n of the ~d~ter pa~ays, walls, la~i~, a~ s~ewalks shall be / /.__ i~lud~ in the r~uir~ la~ ~ans a~ shall ~ ~bj~ to C~y Planner review a~ ~mval and ~inat~ for ~nsiste~ w~h a~ ~ay ~~i~ plan wh~h my ~ r~uimd by the E~ineedng Divis~n. 13. S~ial la~sc~ fea~res s~h as ~ing, alluvial ~, ~imen size trees, meager- / / i~ s~ewalks (with ~r~omal cha~e), a~ imens~i~ ~~, is r~uir~ a~ ~/ 14. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on / /__ the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 15. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas / / the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division. 16. Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for City Planner review and / /- approval prior to issuance of building permits. These criteria shall encourage the natural growth characteristics of the selected tree species. 17. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of / Xedscape as defined in Chapter 19.16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. SC - 2/9 1 5 F. Sign~ 1. Thesignsindicatedonthesubmittedplansareconceptualonlyandnotapartof thisapproval. / /- Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Division priorto installation of any signs. 2. A Uniform Sign Program for this development shall be submitted for City Planner review and / / approval pdor to issuance of building permits. 3. Directory monument sign(s) shall be provided for apartment, condominium, or townhomes / prior to occupancy and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Division pdor to issuance of building permits. G. Environmental 1. The developer shall provide each prospedive buyer written notice of the Fourth Street Rock / / Crusher project in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 2. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the City Adopted / / Special Studies Zone for the Red Hill Fault, in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 3. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Foothill Freeway / /__ project in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, pdor to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 4. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval pdor to the / / issuance of building permits. The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and construction techniques provided, and if appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures. The building plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report. H. Other Agencies v/ 1. ErnergencysecondaryaccessshallbeprovidedinaccordancewithRanchoCucarnongaFire / / Protection District Standards. 4' 2. Emergency access shall be provided, maintenance free and clear, a minimumof261eetwide / /- at all times during construction in accordance with Rancho Cucarnonga Fire Protection District requirements. v/ 3. Prior to issuance of building permits for combustible construction, evidence shall be / submitted to the Rancho Cucarnonga Fire Protection District that temporary water supply for fire protection is available, pending completion of required fire protection system. 4. The applicant shall contact the U. S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and / J-- location of mail boxes. Multi-family residential developments Shall provide a solid overhead structure for mail boxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mail boxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. v/ 5. For projects using septic tank facilities, written certification of acceptability, including all / /- supportive information. shall be obtained from the San Bernardino County Department of Environmental Health and submitted to the Bu!iding Official prior to the issuance of Septic Tank PermitS. and prior to issuance o! building permits. SC -2/91 6 Comvledo~ Date: APPLICANTS SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (714) 989-1863, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE: FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: I. Site Development v/ 1. The applicant shall cornply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Cede, Uniform Mechani- / / cal Cede, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of issuance of relative permits. Please contact the Building and Safety Division for copies of the Cede Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential dwelling unit(s) or major addition / toexistingunit(s),theapplicantshallpaydeveiopmentfeesattheestablishedrate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Systems Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fees. V/ 3. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development or /.__._,/ addition to an existing development, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: Systems Development Fee, Drainage Fee, ~, Permit and Plan Checking Fees. / 4. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building Official, altertract/parcel map recordation and prior to issuance of building permits. Jo Existing Structures 1. Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code for the property line clearances / considering use. area. and fire-resistiveness of existing buildings. 2. Existing buildings shall be made to comply with correct building and zoning regulations for / / the intended use or the building shall be demolished. 3. Existing sewage disposal facilities shall be removed, filled and/or capped to comply with the / Uniform Plumbing Code and Uniform Building Code. 4. Underground on-site utilities are to be located and shown on building plans submitted for / / building parTnit apl~lication. K. Grading V/ 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code. City / / Grading Standards. and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the appmved grading plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to / /.-- pedorm such work. 3. The development is located within the soil erosion control boundaries; a Soil Disturbance / / . Permit is required. Please contact San Bemardino County Department of Agriculture at (714) 387-2111 for permit application. Documentation of such porTnit shall be subm~ed to the City prior to the issuance ol rough grading permit. 4. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at / /- the time of application for grading plan check. 5. The final grading plans shall be completed and approved priorto issuance of building permits. / SC - 2/9]. 7 ~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 22, 1992 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Scott Murphy, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 91-37 - CARL KARCHER ENTERPRISES, INC- - A request to construct a 3,275 square foot fast food restaurant (with drive-thru) within an existing shopping center in the Neighborhood Commercial designation of the Terra Vista Planned Community, located at the southeast corner of Base Line Road and Milliken Avenue - APN: 227-151-21. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested by Applicant: Approval of Conceptual Site Plan, Landscape Plan, building elevations, and issuance of a Negative Declaration- B. Surroundin~ Land Use and Zoning: North - Vacant; Victoria Planned Community, Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) South - Vacant; Terra Vista Planned Community, Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) East - Vacant; Terra Vista Planned Community, Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) West - Vacant, Townhouse project; Terra Vista Planned Community, Office/Professional and Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) C. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Neighborhood Commercial North - Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) South - Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) East - Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) West - Neighborhood Commercial D. Site Characteristics: The site was previously graded as part of the rough grading operation for the entire shopping center. The satellite pad has been temporarily landscaped until such time as the building is approved and building permits are issued- IT]~4 E PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 91-37 - CARL KARCHER July 22, 1992 Page 2 E. Parking Calculations: Number of Number of Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces of Use Footage Ratio Required Provided Fast Food Restaurant 3,275 1/75 44 44* * Provided through reciprocal parking agreement for shopping center. ANALYSIS: A. Background: On June 27, 1990, the Planning Commission approved the Conceptual Master Plan and Phase 1 Site Plan and elevations for Central Park Plaza. As part of the Master Plan, a fast food restaurant with drive-thru was shown at the location of the proposed Carl's Jr. Subsequently, a portion of Phase 1 (Ralph's and retail stores) has been completed. As a condition of approval of the original Conditional Use Permit, satellite pads depicted on the Master Plan require separate review and approval by the Design Review Committee and the Planning Commission. B. General: The applicant is proposing to construct a 3,275 square foot fast food restaurant with drive-thru facility fronting onto Milliken Avenue, just north of the main entry drive. The plans for the restaurant include a drive-thru lane with stacking available for 6 vehicles and outdoor seating with children's play equipment (i.e., ball crawl). C- Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee (McNiel, Melcher, Kroutil) has reviewed the plans for the proposed drive- thru facility on two separate occasions- The initial plans reviewed by the Con~nittee oriented entries toward the north parking area and toward Milliken Avenue. The drive-thru lane was proposed between the building and Milliken Avenue and between the building and the shopping center entry driveway to the south. The Committee recommended that revisions be incorporated into the plans to address the following comments: 1. The landscaping and wall along the drive-thru lane, plus the slight grade differential, was not adequate to screen the stacking area. Alternatives should be explored by the applicant. 2. The loading area proposed was not acceptable because delivery trucks would park in the main drive aisle (along the east side of the building), thereby obscuring vehicle traffic. The loading area and service entry relationship should be re-evaluated. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 91-37 - CARL KARCHER July 22, 1992 Page 3 3. The use of the quarter-round awning appeared "added-on" and should be removed. 4. The east elevation (service area) should be enhanced to create a more acceptable design facing the activity of the center. 5. The drive-thru canopy needs to be more integrated into the design of the building and the center. The pre-cast columns, consistent with the center, was a step in the right direction. 6. The awning color should be evaluated with the redesign. Subsequently, the applicant submitted the revised plans for review by the Design Review Committee (see attached Exhibits). While not reviewing the plans in detail, the Committee (McNiel, Melcher, Kroutil) felt that the changes made provided for a better design but they expressed serious reservations about allowing a drive-thru facility at this location. The Co~nittee questioned whether or not a drive-thru facility along Milliken Avenue was the appropriate land use. Additionally, the Committee felt that the loading for the facility was not adequately addressed. As a result, the Committee could not recommend approval. Rather than continuing to make revisions to the plan, the applicant has requested that the project be scheduled for the Planning Commission to discuss these issues. D. Drive-thru Polic~: In May, 1988, the Planning Commission adopted interim design goals and policies for businesses with drive-thru facilities (see Exhibit "F"). During the discussion and formation of policies, the Burger King facility at Base Line Road and Haven Avenue was being processed through the various Committees. As a result, many of the goals and policies contained in the Resolution were implemented at the Burger King site. While the U-shaped design minimized visibility of the drive-thru lane from Haven Avenue, other concerns surfaced about the pedestrian and vehicular circulation. As a result, the drive-thru policies continue to be a source of discussion. With the recent submittal of five drive-thru facilities, the discussion has increased dramatically in the past two months. As a result, staff is requesting the Commission provide direction for this drive-thru facility and future submittals as they relate to the interim policies. In considering the current submittal, the Planning Commission should consider the following: 1. The interim policies state that the drive-thru lane shall be screened through building orientation and the use of a combination of low screen walls, heavy landscaping, and trellis work. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 91-37 - CARL KARCHER July 22, 1992 Page 4 2. The applicant is proposing to orient the drive-thru lanes parallel to Milliken Avenue and the entry drive. 3. The drive-thru lane will be slightly above the grade of the entry drive, at roughly the same grade as Milliken Avenue at the southern portion of the site, and below the grade of Milliken Avenue at the northern end of the site. 4- The applicant is proposing to construct a 4-foot high solid wall with 4 feet of lattice work on top of the wall to screen the drive-thru lane. Landscaping will be installed adjacent to the wall to supplement the existing landscaping installed with Phase 1- 5. No clearly designated loading area is shown with the submittal. The applicant has indicated that they will receive deliveries from smaller trucks that will not block the drive aisles. 6. Recent Planning Commission approvals for drive-thru facilities have been for locations generally below the street grade and where the stacking area is located to the side and rear of the building (away from the street)- 7. The Design Review Committee recently reviewed a drive-thru facility with the stacking area along a major arterial. This stacking area was slightly below the street grade and retaining/screen walls were incorporated along the drive-thru lane to screen the cars. This solution was found to be acceptable by the Design Review Con~ittee. E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: After having completed the Environmental Checklist, staff has determined that the proposed fast food facility will not have a significant impact on the environment- Therefore, if the Planning Commission approves the Conditional Use Permit, a Negative Declaration should also be issued. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: In order for the Planning Co~ission to approve the Conditional Use Permit application, the following findings must be made: A. That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code and Terra Vista Planned Community, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. B. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 91-37 - CARL KARCHER July 22, 1992 Page 5 C. That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code and the Terra Vista Planned Community. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property has been posted, and notices have been sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the site. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission receive all written and oral testimony on the proposed project. After receiving all information, there are two options available to the Planning Commission: 1- If the Commission feels there are sufficient facts to support the findings, staff should be directed to prepare a Resolution of Approval subject to conditions requiring the final design to be consistent with recent Commission action for a similar facility. The final plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner; or 2. If the Commission can not support the findings, staff should be directed to prepare a Resolution of Denial for adoption at the next Planning Commission meeting. Respect~~~d~ City Planner BB:SM:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site Plan for the Shopping Center Exhibit "B" - Detailed Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Landscape Plan Exhibit "D" - Building Elevations Exhibit "E" - Grading Plan Exhibit "F" - Drive-thru Interim Design Goals and Policies ~ j ,I 9 C _ TRANSFORMER C TRASH C [ CLOSURE C C ' - 1I C C ~ z, FLAG POt.[ C \ ~o E.CL ~SuRm 7 PuBUC TELEPHONE PER CITY MENU 82' CARLI JR. REITAURANT L~ \ ~ I ,,,,(/ I I 129' WINDOW SHOPPING CENT['R PiCK-UP WINDOw ,,'nI -- StUN WALL , 13UILDINC LIMIT LINE ;~E~ C[,,NTRAL PARK PLAZA C;,,JPI89-18 -- t EXIST. ClNNAMOMUM CAMPHORA I > ~) ' · ~ .' -- TRANSFORMER / · EXIST. XYLOSMA CON. , ' ExiST. P~NUS C~N. / ~ , i ~ I EXIST. PHOTINIA FRA, 1 ] ~ ' i . ( )LE PARKING ~ ,-'.., GROUNDCOVER/SHRUBS TYP ,, ANNUAL COLOR TYP. ~ EXIST. TURF HIGH SCREEN WALL EXIST. CUPANIOPSIS ANA. [ EXIST. NANDINA DOM. HARBOR DW, ; -.~ ,, EXIST. BRACHYCHITON POP.~ NORTH ~ , ~ . , SITE & LANDSCAP ~' / C) ~'X'///,8'//" 'ZD -~'" RESOLUTION NO. 88-96 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTABLISHING INTERIM DESIGN GOALS AND POLICIES FOR BUSINESSES WITH DRIVE-THRU FACILITIES WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has expressed numerous concerns with businesses that have drive-thru facilities including, but not limited to, fast food restaurants. The concerns are compatibility of use, circulation, and visual and aesthetic appearance. Previous projects have not adequately addressed these concerns, especially in the screening of the drive-thru lane; and WHEREAS, there is a need to establish a design goal for businesses with drive-thru facilities to guide future development; and WHEREAS, development standards and design guidelines are necessary to implement the design goal for businesses with drive-thru facilities; and WHEREAS, such development standards and design guidelines are needed to provide clear direction and guidance to developers and staff alike. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission does hereby establish interim policies for businesses with drive- thru facilities as follows: Secti on 1: Goal Statement The intent of the gui deli nes i s to assi st the designer i n understanding and complying with the City standards for building and site design. The goal is to provide high quality design, compatibility of use, and mitigate environmental and aesthetic concerns that are created by this type of land use. The following design standards and guidelines shall apply to uses with drive-thru facilities typically including, but not limited to, fast food restaurants, banks, mini-markets, dairy, photo kiosks, or auto service. Secti on 2: Development Standards A. Location - Uses with drive-thru facilities shall be 300 feet away from any intersection and from another drive-thru facility on the same side of the street, except within a shopping center or Master Plan. Restaurants with drive-thru facilities shall be a minimum of 200 feet away from any residential use or district boundary. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUiiUN NU. DRIVE-THRU INTERIM DESIGN GOALS/POLICIES May 11, 1988 Page 2 B. Site Area - Uses with drive-thru facilities shall have a minimum 1 acre net land area. This minimum land area may be modified when the drive-thru facility is within a Master Plan or an integrated shopping center through the Design Review process. C. The minimum floor area for drive-thru facilities shall be 2,500 square feet. The minimum floor area for a drive-thru facility other than a fast food restaurant may be modified through the Design Review process. D. The maximum site coverage shall be 40 percent of the net lot area. The minimum on-site landscaping, which includes articulated plazas, courtyards, and patios, shall be 15 percent of the net lot area exclusive of public right-of-way. E. Parking and the drive-thru lane shall be setback 45 feet from the ultimate curb face. Greater setbacks may be required as mentioned in the Specific Plan and as deemed necessary during the Design Review process. Section 3: Design Guidelines A. Site Planning/Building Orientation - Future drive-thru facilities in a Master Plan or shopping center shall be identified early in the review process to avoid retrofitting the uses at a later date. The site design shall minimize pedestrian/vehicle conflicts and avoid locating driveways and service areas which interfere with the flow of the on-site circulation. Building placement shall be done in a manner to create new pedestrian spaces and plaza area. Buildings shall orient the public entrances toward the street. Building layout should be oriented to screen the drive-thru lane. Drive-thru lanes shall be screened through building orientation, the use of a combination of low screen walls, heavy landscaping, and trellis work. Separate pay windows and pick-up windows should be provided. B. Stacking Distance/Parking - The drive-thru lane shall be a sufficient length to accommodate the necessary stacking of cars. The stacking distance shall be determined through a parking study as stated in Section 17.12.040C, Special Requirements of the Parking Ordinance. Each drive-thru lane shall be separate from the circulation route necessary for ingress and egress from the property or access to any · parking spaces within the site. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DRIVE-THRU INTERIM DESIGN GOALS/POLICIES May 11, 1988 Page 3 C. Parking - The parking requirements for drive-thru facilities shall be according to Section 17.12 of the Parking Ordinance. The gross floor area for outdoor seating shall be subject to the same parking requirement. D. Pedestrian Orientation - The Site Plan shall create opportunities for courtyards and plazas and other landscape open space to promote safe and convenient pedestrian movement with continuous landscape pathway between buildings. The design should discourage a need for pedestrians to have to cross a drive-thru wherever possible. E. Architecture - Standardized "corporate" architectural styles associated wit a chain is prohibited. Drive- thru facilities within an integrated shopping center or Master Plan must have architectural style consistent with the theme established in the center. Architecture must provide compatibility to surrounding uses in form, materials, colors, scale, etc. Building planes shall have variation in depth and angle to create variety and interest in its basic form and silhouette of the building. Articulation of building surface shall be encouraged through the use of openings and recesses which create texture and shadow patterns. Building entrances shall be well articulated and project a formal entrance through variation of architectural plane, pavement surface, treatment, and landscape plaza. F. Signing - All signs shall conform with the provisions of the Sign Ordinance. Drive-thru facilities within an integrated shopping center or Master Plan must comply with the Uniform Sign Program as established in the center. Section 4: Performance Standards A. Special performance standards for restaurants with drive-thru facilities: The use shall be operated in a manner which does not interfere with the normal use of :adjoining properties. If, in the opinion of the City Planner, the provisions of this paragraph are being violated, the violations shall be grounds for reopening Conditional Use Permit hearings and adding conditions to control the violation. Performance standards include, but are not limited to the following considerations, which, where appropriate, shall be incorporated as conditions of approval in all use permits as determined by the Planning Con~nission or City Council: PLANNINb bUM~UN ~ou~ui~uN Nu. DR[YE-THRU INTERIN DESIGN ~OALS/POL[C[ES Nay 11, 1988 Page 4 (1) Noise levels measured at the property line shall not exceed the level of background noise normally found in the area. {2) The premises shall be kept clean, and the operator shall make all reasonable efforts to see that no trash or litter originating from the use is deposited on adjacent properties. For drive- thru restaurants or other uses which typically generate trash or litter, adequate trash containers, as determined by the City Planner, shall be required and employees shall be required daily to pick up trash or litter originating from the site upon the site and within 300 feet of the perimeter of the property. (3) All graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours. (4) No undesirable odors shall be generated on the site. (5) The on-site manager of the use shall take whatever steps are deemed necessary to assure the orderly conduct of employees, patrons, and visitors on the premises. (6) A copy of these performance standards and all Conditional Use Permit conditions of approval shall be posted along side the necessary business licenses and be visible at all times to employees. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF MAY, 1988. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Larry ~: '~N(el..~~/airman r ATTEST: ~~~-" ll etary Br dxB~ I, Brad er, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of May, 1988, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, BLAKESLEY, EMERICK, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE:Ju y 22, 1992STAFF REPORT TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Beverly Nissen, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 91-21 - L.A- CELLULAR - The development of a cellular telecommunications facility consisting of a 10-foot by 10-foot equipment building and a 60-foot monopole antenna located on a fully developed industrial site in the General Industrial District (Subarea 14) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, located at 9320 Hyssop Drive - APN: 229-321- 02- Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A- Action Requested by Applicant: Approval of a Conditional Use Permit to allow a 60-foot monopole antenna within the General Industrial District (Subarea 14) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan and issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. Applicable Regulations: A monopole in conjunction with a cellular telecommunications facility is considered a "Public Safety and Utility Service" which includes communications equipment installations and exchanges as defined by the Industrial Area Specific Plan. Within Subarea 14, Public Safety and Utility Service is permitted subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. C- Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North ' Industrial building; General Industrial (Subarea 14) South - Industrial building; General Industrial (Subarea 14) East - Vacant; General Industrial (Subarea 14) West - 1-15 Freeway D. General Plan Designations: Project Site - General Industrial North - General Industrial South - General Industrial East - General Industrial West - General Industrial E. Site Characteristics: The site contains a fully developed industrial building with parking lot and landscaping at 9320 Hyssop Drive. ITE~ F PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 91-21 - L.A. CELLULAR July 22, 1992 Page 2 ANALYSIS: A. General: The facility was originally proposed to be located on a vacant site on the west side of Hyssop Street, approximately 300 feet south of Seventh Street. The Design Review Committee (McNiel, Chitiea, Kroutil) reviewed the project on October 17, 1991, and did not recommend approval. The Committee felt the proposed location adjacent to the freeway would create a negative visual impact from the freeway. The Committee suggested relocating the use away from the freeway in an existing industrial site where the equipment could be better screened or placed within a building. Therefore, the applicant selected a new site (see Exhibit "B"). The proposed project consists of a 40-foot x 20-foot equipment building which will be placed inside the existing industrial building and the placement of a 60-foot monopole in a landscaped planter area at the northeast corner of the building (see Exhibit "D"). The monopole will be enclosed by an 8-foot high masonry wall. The enclosed area is approximately 10 feet x 10 feet in area. B. pesign Review Committee: The Design Review Committee (Melcher, Tolstoy, Coleman) reviewed the revised project on May 21, 1992, and recommended approval with the following conditions: 1. The monopole should be painted a single color to match the building- 2. The masonry enclosure should be painted concrete to match the building- 3- Landscaping should be planted around the enclosure. C- Technical Review Committee: The original proposal was reviewed and approved by the Technical Review Committee on October 16, 1991. Comments were elicited from the Technical Review Committee members regarding the new location; however, no concerns were voiced- D. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has been completed by the applicant- Staff has completed Part II of the Environmental Checklist and found no significant impacts on the environment as a result of this project. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: This project is consistent with the Industrial Specific Plan, the Development Code, and the General Plan, and will not be detrimental to adjacent properties or cause significant adverse impacts. The proposed use, together with recommended conditions of approval, is in compliance with all applicable regulations of the Development Code. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 91-21 - L.A. CELLULAR July 22, 1992 Page 3 CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property has been posted, and notices were sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the project site. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Conditional Use Permit 91-21 through adoption of the attached Resolution. City Planner BB:BN:js Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Letter from Applicant Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" -Subarea 14 Exhibit "D" - Detailed Site plan/Elevation Resolution of Approval CELLULAR Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Company April 5, 1992 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Community Development Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Attn: Mr. Tom Grahn Re: CUP Application 91-21 Dear Mr. Grahn: Please accept our resubmittal of the above referenced application for a Conditional Use Permit for a Cellular Telecommunications Facility to be located at 9320 Hyssop Dr. As advised by the head of the Design Review Board, we have placed the monopole beside an existing commercial building in order to lessen it ' s visual impact. Since the requirement to provide coverage along Interstate 15 is paramount in our decision to locate on this property, the placement of the monopole at the northeast corner of the building will at least partially shield it from view. The pole will be painted the same color as the building to the roof-line and light blue above. The radio-transmission and related equipment will be installed in a tenant-improvement to be located inside the northwest corner of the building. We are hoping so a successful outcome this go-around as the need for improved cellular service is growing in that area. Additionally, the requirement for adequate cellular service is vital for the growing numbers of emergency services agencies which utilize this efficient means of communication. I have enclosed-a couple of recent magazine articles that illustrate this more effectively than I am able. L.A. Cellular also provides service to the CALTRANS installed "call box" system we see along our freeways in Southern California. This superior technology has allowed call boxes to be installed in areas . I1 II Box 6028, Cerritos, California02-6028 (310) 924-0000 previous considered too remote or too expensive when the system was a "landline" (hardwire) one. Hopefully, we can now consider this application complete and can get underway again. Thank you, Linda C. Paul Civil Coordinator APN .o 229-283-11 Ld APN ,, 9-283-12 EXIST. s BLDG. EXIST. BLDG. o AP" O 229--A~1-0~ EX I~TINC_~ 'BLDG- SITE LOCATION MAP NO SCALE 15 IlJI. O*1OIO$ Note: Parcel and lot confiFaretion8 ore shoe 88 aplxoxlnmUoe oedy. 1The sites shown my fret be cufrenUy owned hoe b the location site specific, The depiction of · 8ire b me Indication of · IxoJected fursare need that my be adjusted. ove~ time as the City develolx. :rl'Y OF RANCHO...CUCAMONGA ITEM: C~P ~1-~! ""- PLANNING' DIVISION -iTrLE: '~t~A~..~ I~r N ~- EXHIBIT:. d SCALE: ~ _ · ,~ RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 91-21 FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A CELLULAR TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITY CONSISTING OF A 10-FOOT X 10-FOOT EQUIPMENT BUILDING AND A 60-FOOT MONOPOLE ANTENNA LOCATED ON A FULLY DEVELOPED INDUSTRIAL SITE IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT (SUBAREA 14) OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED AT 9320 HYSSOP DRIVE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 229- 321-02. A. Recitals. (i) L.A. Cellular has filed an application for the issuance of the Conditional Use Permit No. 91-21 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application." (ii) On the 22nd day of July 1992, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on July 22, 1992, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application a~plies to property located at 9320 Hyssop Drive with a street frontage of approximately 540 feet and lot depth of 260 feet and is presently improved with an industrial building, parking facility and landscaping; and (b) The property to the north of the subject site is developed with an industrial building, the property to the south of the site consists of an industrial building, the property to the east is vacant, and the property to the west is the 1-15 freeway. (c) The site is within the General Industrial District of the Industrial Area Specific Plan. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 91-21 - L.A. CELLULAR July 22, 1992 Page 2 (d) The monopole is located on the east side of an existing industrial building and will be partially screened from the 1-15 Freeway by the building and will be surrounded on the other three sides by an 8-foot high masonry wall. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs i and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. (b) That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. (c) That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration · 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below: Planninq Division: 1) Approval shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, if building permits have not been issued within 24 months of this date. 2) The monopole shall be painted a single color to match the building. 3)The masonry enclosure shall be painted concrete to match the building. 4 ) Landscaping shall be planted around the enclosure. Landscape Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. Buildinq and Safety: 1 ) Building permits shall be required for the monopole and the 8-foot screen wall. Structural calculations shall be required prior to the issuance of ~uilding permits. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 91-21 - L.A. CELLULAR July 22, 1992 Page 3 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF JULY 1992. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Bullet, Secretary I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22nd day of July 1992, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: JUly 22, 1992 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Beverly Nissen, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 91-24 - MASI - The development of 32 buildings totaling approximately 268,907 square feet and comprised of a mix of industrial, multi-tenant, office, and restaurant uses in the Industrial Park district (Subarea 7) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, located at the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue - APN: 229-011-10, 19, 21, 26, 27, and 28- Associated with the project is Parcel Map 13845. Staff recommends issuance of a mitigated Negative Declaration- PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested by Applicant: Approval of Conditional Use Permit 91-24 to allow the development of 32 buildings consisting of a mix of industrial, multi-tenant, office, and restaurant uses located at the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue and issuance of a mitigated Negative Declaration. B. Surroundin~ Land Use and Zoning: North - Vacant; Terra Vista Planned Community; MOC (Mixed, Office, Commercial, Residential) South - Sports Complex; Subarea 7 (Industrial Park), Industrial Area Specific Plan East - Aggazzotti Winery; Subarea 8 (Industrial Park), Industrial Area Specific Plan West - Vacant; Subarea 7 (Industrial Park), Industrial Area Specific Plan C. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Industrial Park North - Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) South - Industrial Park East - Industrial Park West - Industrial Park ITEM G PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 91-24 - MASI July 22, 1992 Page 2 D. Site Characteristics: The site is approximately 27 acres in size and slopes approximately 2 percent from north to south- The site is generally vacant except for the existing "La Fourcade" stucco building at the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester which is currently vacant, but which most recently housed the Cowgirl Theater. Prior to this, the building was originally utilized as a store and gasoline filling station and later as a restaurant. The building is slated for demolition, however, it was recently designated as an Historic Point of Interest by the City Council. Approximately five Olive trees (Olea europa) were located along the eastern side of the parcel and were removed with the widening of Rochester Avenue- E- Parking Calculations: See Exhibit "A". ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicant is proposing to develop 32 buildings on 27 gross acres of land. Building 1 is a Jiffy Lube facility; Building 2, a Texaco gas station; and Building 32, a Midas Muffler Shop. Buildings 30 and 31 are also automotive-type uses. An Automotive Service Court concept was approved as part of Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment (ISPA) 92-02 (See Section C). Building 3 is a fast food restaurant (Jack-In-The Box) with a drive-thru lane. Building 5 is a proposed restaurant of 14,000 square feet. No architectural elevations have been submitted for Building 5 as it is currently the site of the Victory Chapel. In the future, a Development Review application will be required when architectural elevations for the proposed restaurant are submitted- Building 14 may possibly become the future location of the Victory Chapel facility which is currently located in an existing building on the site- A portion of Building 4 (4,000 square feet) is also proposed for restaurant use- All of the above uses fall under the currently proposed Conditional Use Permit, except for Victory Chapel which has a separate approved Conditional Use Permit- Buildings 15-29 in the southern portion of the site are proposed to be used for multi-tenant industrial uses and possibly warehousing. Buildings 8-13 in the center of the site are proposed for Speciality Building Supplies and Home Improvement uses or possibly multi-tenant industrial. Buildings 6 and 7 will most likely be used as some type of office space. B- BackgTound: The Planning Commission has conducted preliminary courtesy workshops on this project on August 8, September 5, and PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 91-24 - MASI July 22, 1992 Page 3 September 25, 1991. After the third workshop, a subcommittee of the Planning Con~nission (McNiel, Melcher) was appointed to address architectural issues. The subcommittee and staff met with the applicants on October 10, and October 31, 1991. The subcommittee then forwarded two alternative architectural concepts to the full Planning Commission for review on November 13, 1991. At that meeting, the Commission felt the more traditional of the two architectural styles was the preferred concept and directed the applicant to proceed in that direction. C. Industrial Specific Plan Amendment: Concurrently with the CUP application, the applicant submitted a request for an Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment. ISPA 92-02 was a three part amendment which was reviewed by the Planning Commission on March 11, and March 25, 1992 and approved by the City Council on June 3, 1992 through Ordinance 496 (Exhibit "B"). The amendment modified the three following aspects of the Industrial Area Specific Plan: 1. The local circulation pattern along Rochester Avenue was modified to shift access points in a southerly direction. 2- An Auto Court use, consisting of automotive services and related activities was added as a conditionally permitted use in Subarea 7, subject to design guidelines. 3. Specialty Building Supplies and Home Improvement was added to the list of conditionally permitted uses for Subarea 7. All three of the above elements have been incorporated into the Conditional Use Permit application- The northernmost driveway on Rochester Avenue currently coincides with the revised access location- An Auto Court use has been proposed in the northwest portion of the site and has been reviewed for compliance with the newly adopted design guidelines by the Design Review Committee. Additionally, Specialty Building Supplies and Home Improvements uses may potentially be located in the buildings in the center portion of the site which are 25,000 square feet or less. D. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee (McNiel, Melcher, Kroutil) reviewed site plan issues on April 16, 1992. The applicant presented two alternatives at the meeting- Alternative A indicated Buildings 6 and 7 at the extreme northeast corner of the site and Building 5 (proposed restaurant) with 10,000 square feet. Alternative B indicated the deletion of Building 7 and the expansion of Building 5 to 14,000 square feet. The Committee did not approve the project and requested that the following items be revised and re-reviewed by the Design Review Co~nittee: PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 91-24 - MASI July 22, 1992 Page 4 1. The Activity Center concept requires additional analysis and the applicant should study all four corners of the intersection to ensure that spatial relationships are compatible. The applicant may wish to consider relocating the drive aisle on Foothill Boulevard westerly in order to expand Building 5 (Spaghetti Factory) to the west which could create a more pleasing symmetry at the corner. The applicant might also consider creating a pedestrian oriented courtyard or other focal point at the corner and flanking it with buildings along both Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue. 2. The screening of the Auto Court is acceptable as presented; however, the on-site circulation pattern is problematic due in part to the northerly driveway. There may also be on-site traffic conflicts with automobiles exiting the car wash and those entering the Jiffy Lube. The on-site circulation should be carefully reconsidered and the northerly driveway into the Auto Court should be deleted. 3- The applicant should provide more details for the Jack-In-The- Box facility- The trash enclosure should be relocated closer to the building- The applicant should consider a small retaining wall at the corner to further screen the drive-thru aisle. It would be awkward to screen the drive-thru lane with the building; however, the use of trellis work and low screen walls could be incorporated- The drive-thru policy also requires that the buildings orient public entrances to the street which the applicant has complied with- The southern side of the facility has the potential for pedestrian plazas and eating areas which has not been explored in the proposed design- 4- The alignment of "A" Street (Masi Drive) is acceptable as a straight street- The sidewalk should also be straight, however, extensive landscaping should be provided along the street frontage. 5. The landscaping adjacent to the buildings should be re-worked as much as possible to provide wider planter areas in order to accommodate tree plantings. 6. Details of lunch court areas should be worked out with staff. The size of the eating areas is acceptable, but the applicant should review the landscaping and str~t furniture details with staff. 7. The parking layout adjacent to Buildings 8-12 should be redesigned in order to provide the majority of the parking aisles in a north/south direction- The Committee suggested PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 91-24 - MASI July 22, 1992 Page 5 that there should be some type of continuous east/west drive aisle that did not have parking spaces backing up onto it. It was suggested that a scheme similar to the K-Mart Center could be utilized which has a parking court in front of the main row of buildings- 8- The required historic element should be incorporated into the site design and presented to the Committee for review and approval. 9- The wind chimes tower and the two fountains should be integrated more carefully into the site plan. 10. The applicant should work with staff to resolve the on-site circulation in the southern portion of the site. The triangular shaped planters could be flattened out to provide a straighter driving path from east to west. 11. The median along "A" Street should be deleted unless Engineering staff will permit it. The applicant could also move the median to the private drive aisle off of Foothill Boulevard which would alleviate Engineering concerns. The Design Review Committee (McNiel, Kroutil) reviewed architectural issues at their May 7, 1992, meeting. In response to written staff comments, the applicant brought modified architectural elevations for several buildings to the meeting. These modifications were reviewed by the Committee and the following observations were made: 1. The design of the canopy element used throughout the project needs to be explained graphically, in a larger scale- The Committee also expressed serious reservations about the use of fabric/mylar awnings in this high wind area- 2. The detailing of all auto court structures should resemble more closely the other con~eercial/service buildings in the project through the use of appropriate base material, cornice, and window treatment. In particular, the car wash enclosure and Buildings 31 and 43 require additional attention to be more consistent with the rest of the project. 3- The 9-foot high auto court screen wall should retain 2-3 feet of fill to reduce its apparent height from Foothill Boulevard. 4- In general, all structures should be more three-dimensional with varying degrees of architectural treatment on all sides- Appropriate architectural treatment should wrap around the west elevation of Building 8, the west/northwest elevations of Building 19, and south elevation of Building 20- PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 91-24 - MASI July 22, 1992 Page 6 The applicant also introduced an elevation of the south property line. It was the Con~nittee's consensus that a 6-foot high wall, as measured from the north side, would be adequate. It was noted that tree plantings would be needed just south of Building 20. (Please note the question of required fill/retention along the southerly property line is yet to be resolved- Staff's recommendation will continue to be that the amount of fill and subsequent overall height of the south bank of structures be minimized.) The applicant also brought a new concept for the activity center/ "Vintner's Walk-" While the idea appeared imaginative, the presentation was very sketchy and needed to be developed in some detail. Staff suggested a joint Historic Preservation Commission/Planning Commission subcommittee meeting to review this concept · Although the site plan was not on the agenda, a revised site plan was introduced at the meeting by the applicant. Engineering staff had again indicated their objection to the proposed median within the local public street- The applicant was directed to submit a complete and internally consistent development package, including a fully dimensioned site plan, landscape plan, and all elevations for approval by Technical and Design Review Committees- The Committee (McNiel, Chitiea, Kroutil) met again on June 4, 1992, to discuss the remaining site plan and architectural issues. The applicant made alterations to the plans which effectively addressed the above noted issues: Site Planning: No. 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, and Architecture: No. 3- The Design Review Committee (Chitiea, McNiel, Kroutil) requested that the following item be reviewed by them prior to scheduling for a Planning Commission hearing: 1- The applicant should provide material samples and colors of the mylar/canvas canopy element and the perforated steel canopy material so that the Committee can make a final selection. The following items should either be re-reviewed by the Committee or placed as conditions on the project: 2. Vines should be added adjacent to Buildings 11-18 along the alley-side where area for planting is severely limited. 3. Trees within the lunch court areas should actually be planted in the ground rather than in pots- Each eating area should be PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 91-24 - MASI July 22, 1992 Page 7 provided with a trash receptacle. The furniture should be revised to have backs on the seats for greater comfort- 4. The buildings comprising the Auto Court have been designed with 4-inch stucco recesses. The recesses should be redesigned with a bull nose or something other than a strictly 90-degree angle. 5. The revisions to Buildings 8 and 19 were acceptable; however, the south side of Building 20, due to its proximity to Rochester Avenue, will require additional upgrading. Additionally, the rear elevations of Buildings 21-23 should be upgraded. The Committee (McNiel, Chitiea, Kroutil) recommended approval of the revised project on June 18, 1992, with the following items to be reviewed by the Design Review Committee prior to Planning Commission hearing or added as conditions to the Resolution of Approval: 1. Vines adjacent to Buildings 11-18 should be planted in a continuous 2-foot planter, rather than vine pockets, if permitted by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District. 2. The Committee (McNiel, Chitiea, Kroutil) approved the mylar/canvas canopy element in the thickest gauge available. Color schemes of the canvas should be carefully worked out- A diagram providing color locations should be submitted for review and approval by the Committee. The possibility of keying the awning color to the type of use was also discussed. 3. The glass along the south elevation of Building 20 should be recessed in a manner similar to the other proposed buildings. 4. A reflective coating should be applied to the glass portions of those buildings which face drive aisles and Rochester Avenue- The purpose of the reflective coating is to provide an opaqueness to the glass so that storage areas will not b~ visible- 5. Vines planted along the Sports Park property (south of the south property wall) should be allowed to extend up and over the wall and onto the buildings in order to discourage gaffiti and to soften the wall and buildings. 6- The bullnose edge for all buildings with the 4-inch stucco recess should be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division- PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 91-24 - MASI July 22, 1992 Page 8 7. Lunch court furniture should be revised to include wire seats and concrete tables. Wire seats should match the proposed awning color. 8. The applicant should consider providing a stone base along the bottom portion of Buildings 4, 7, and 20 in those locations where glass extends all the way to the ground. The applicant has incorporated Items No. 1, 3, and 7 into their final submittal package. Items No. 2, 4, 5, 6, and 8 will be added as conditions of approval- E. Fast-Food Pad: A fast food restaurant (Jack-In-The-Box) is proposed on Parcel 30 (directly east of "B" Street, along Foothill Boulevard). The facility was reviewed by staff and the Design Review Committee (McNiel, Melcher and Kroutil) on April 16, 1992, for conformance with the interim drive-thru policies as indicated in Section D above. The facility is inconsistent with the drive- thru policy in that the stacking aisle is directly adjacent to Foothill Boulevard- The applicant has mitigated this concern, however, by adding trellis work with vine plantings and low screen walls along the north side of the structure. Additionally, a 3-foot earthen berm is located between the structure and Foothill Boulevard. F. Historic Preservation Commission: The Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) requested that the property at the southwest corner of Rochester and Foothill Boulevard be reviewed to determine its historic significance in response to a demolition request for the structure known as the Cowgirl Theater. The HPC recommended that the LaFourcade store be designated an Historic Point of Interest- The recommendation was forwarded to the City Council on September 18, 1991. The designation was approved on that date along with a mitigated Negative Declaration- Mitigation measures for the demolition are noted in Exhibit "C." The applicant has complied with Conditions No. ~ and 3- Condition No- 4 deals with a monetary contribution to be collected prior to the issuance of building permits. Although this condition has previously been reviewed by HPC and City Council, it has also been included in the Resolution of Approval for this application, since it is tied to building permit issuance for the project- Condition No. 5 dealing with oral history interviews is being worked out with HPC staff- Condition No. 2 states the following: The development of the site shall incorporate details of the sites history, in particular the LaFourcade period, through the incorporation of the following measures: commissioned public art and development and placement of PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 91-24 - MASI July 22, 1992 Page 9 interpretative public displays- The final specifications of such measures shall be reviewed by the Historic Preservation Commission and forwarded with the recommendation to the Planning Commission during development/design review hearings on any development proposal for this site. Final approval of the appropriate public art and interpretive displays shall occur prior to the issuance of any building permits." In working towards fulfillment of this condition, the applicant met with a subcommittee of the Historic Preservation Commission and the Planning Commission (Marsha Banks, Steve Preston, Larry McNiel, Suzanne Chitiea) on May 27, 1992, to discuss their proposal for commissioned public art and the development and placement of interpretive public displays- The applicant presented their concepts to the subcommittee, which were essentially acceptable- The following proposals were approved by the Historic Preservation Commission on July 2, 1992- I~terpretive Public Display~ and Vintner's Walk: The walkway will extend approximately 160 feet along Foothill Boulevard as originally proposed. The names of the Vintner families, along with the dates their wineries were established, will be incorporated into the walk on inscribed pavers. The walkway will have a metal trellis along its length and historical display panels with text and photos depicting the history of wine making in the area starting with the LaFourcade period and covering the immigrant grape growers and vintners of the 1920s to 1930s- Areas for seating will be incorporated along the walkway. The applicant has proposed four to six display panels; however, staff would recommend that six be utilized along the length of the walk. The applicant has also proposed a 7-foot wide "story bard" at the eastern end of the Vintner's Walk where the original LaFourcade store stood- The story bard would be a bas relief depicting the LaFourcade winery. The applicant has proposed that the relief pictorially show LaFourcade directing the construction of the first wells in Cucamonga as well as views of some of the. buildings he constructed. Also in partial fulfillment of the interpretive display requirement, the applicant has proposed an additional story board location at the western end of the Vintner's Walk &=picting the Masi family. The bas relief would portray the hillside vineyards of the Masi's home town in Italy, members of the Masi family, and their lands and winery in Cucamonga. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 91-24 - MASI July 22, 1992 Page 10 Commissioned Public Art: To fulfill this requirement, the applicant has proposed a sculpture of a vintner carrying a basket of grapes which would be located approximately midway along the Vintner's Walk. The sculpture is intended as a tribute to the wine making ~families of the area- A 12-inch wax model of the sculpture will be available at the meeting. A condition of approval has been incorporated into the Resolution of Approval which requires final detailed plans to be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits- G. Technical Review Committee: The Technical Review Committee reviewed the project on April 15, and June 3, 1992. Comments from the Technical Review Comn~ittee have been incorporated into the recommended Conditions of Approval- H. Grading Committee: The Grading Committee reviewed the project on April 14, and June 2, 1992, and recommended approval on June 2. I. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has been completed by the applicant- Staff has completed Part II of the Environmental Checklist and found that, although the project could have a significant effect on the environment in several areas, including traffic and cultural resources, there will not be a significant effect on the environment in this case because of the mitigation measures which have been included in the project design or as Conditions of Approval within the attached Resolution- Therefore, if after reviewing the proposed mitigation measures specified within the Resolution, the Commission concurs with staff's findings, then issuance of a mitigated Negative Declaration would be in order. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: In order for the Planning Commission to approve the project, the following facts for findings must be made: A- The proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code and the Industrial Area Specific Plan, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. B- The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or ~terially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. C- The proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code and Industrial Area Specific Plan. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the project has been posted, and notices were sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the project site- PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 91-24 - MASI July 22, 1992 Page 11 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Commission receive all public testimony on the project · If after receiving all testimony, the Commission concurs with the findings suggested, then issuance of a mitigated Negative Declaration and approval of Conditional Use Permit 91-24 through adoption of the attached Resolution would be in order, Res ull ' , ller y Planner Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Parking Calculations Exhibit "B" - Ordinance 496 Exhibit "C" - Resolution 91-275 (Historic Point of Interest) Exhibit "D" - Parcel Map 13845 Exhibit "E" - Detailed Site Plan Exhibit "F" - Landscape Plan Exhibit "G" - Street Corner Study Exhibit "H" - Activity Center Exhibit "I" - Lunch Area Exhibit "J" - Shared Entries along "A" Street Exhibit "K" - Section at Auto Court Exhibit "L" - Building 2 Exhibit "M" - Building 3 Exhibit "N" - Building 3 Section Exhibit "O" - Building 4 Exhibit "P" - Building 4 Exhibit "Q" - Building 6 & 7 Exhibit "R" - Building 6 & 7 Exhibit "S" - Building 8-12 Exhibit "T" -Building 13 Exhibit "U" -Building 13 Exhibit "V" -Building 14 Exhibit "W" - Building 15 & 16; 17 & 18 Exhibit "X" -Building 19 Exhibit "Y" - Building 20 Exhibit "Z" - Building 21 Exhibit "AA" - Building 22 & 23; 24 & 25 Exhibit "BB" - Building 26 Exhibit "CC" - Building 27 Exhibit "DD" - Building 28 Exhibit "EE" - Building 29 Exhibit "FF" - Building 30 Exhibit "GG" - Building 31 Exhibit "HH" - Building 32 Exhibit "II" - Section at South Property Line Resolution of Approval with Conditions PARKING CALCULATIONS FOR CUP 91-24 BLDG. TYPE OF SQUARE PARKING RATIO # OF SPACES # OF SPACES NO. LLSE FOOTAGE ( PER SQ. FT. ) REQUIRED PROVIDED 1 Jiffy Lube 1800 ( 3 bays ) 3 + 2/bay 9 12 2 Texaco 1800 10 I 1 self service car wash 2.5 gas station 3+2/bay 3 Jack-in-the-Box 2770 1/75 37 36 4 Restaurant 4000 1/100 40 45 Office 5400 1/250 22 22 5 Restaurant 14000 1/100 (< 6000)+ 205 150( * ) 1/55(>6000) 6 Office 5400 1/250 22 22 7 Office 5000 1/250 20 20 8 Office 20000 1/250 80 90 9 Office 22000 1/250 88 100 10 Office 20200 1/250 81 101 11 Multi-tenant Industrial 10000 1/400 25 44(**) 12 Multi-tenant Industrial 10000 1/400 25 44(**) 13 Multi-tenant Industrial 8800 1/400 22 43(**) 14 Multi-tenant Industrial 8096 1/400 20 25 15 Multi-tenant Industrial 5682 1/400 14 16 16 iMulti-tenant Industrial 5682 1/400 14 17 17 Multi-tenant Industrial 5325 1/400 13 16 I 8 Multi-tenant Industrial 6395 1/400 I 6 17 19 Multi-tenant Industrial 8200 1/400 21 26 20 Multi-tenant Industrial 8900 1/400 22 34 21 Multi-tenant Industrial 7500 1/400 I 9 20 22 Multi-tenant Industrial 6304 1/400 16 I 8 23 Multi-tenant Industrial 7145 1/400 I 8 19 24 Multi-tenant Industrial 7145 1/400 I 8 19 25 Multi-tenant Industrial 6724 1/400 17 I 8 26 Multi-tenant Industrial 6300 1/400 16 17 27 IMulti-tenant Industrial 7200 1/400 I 8 18 28 Manufacturing 14000 1/500 28 28 29 Manufacturing 12000 1/500 24 24 30 Auto Service 9568 3 + 2roay 13 25 31 Auto Service 7079 3 + 2foay 19 20 32 Auto Service (Midas) 5060 3 + 2/bay I I _ 19 TOTAL 102 3 113 6 ( * ) - A parking easement will be granted from Parcel 24 (Bldgs. 11, 12, and 13) to Parcel 27 (Bldg. 5) providing the additional 55 spaces required for the restaurant facility. ( ** ) - Buildings 11, 12, and 13 have an excess of 59 parking spaces which will be allocated to Building 5. Note that parcel lines can not be changed to equalize the parking due to different ownerships EXHIBIT "A" O~DINANCE NO. 496 AN C~DINANCE OF ~ME CITY ~ OF ~E CITY OF RANCHO ~, C~;.~, APPROVING ~ AREA SPECIFIC PIAN AMBaqEMBNT 92-02, PARTS A & B, k~,TMINATING DESIGNATED SERV/CE ~ USE CC~SI~ OF ~ ST~VI~ AND ~ATBD A~r~v~'r, ~-~ AS A (I~DITIC~ALLY PBa~TTfD USE ~ SUBAREA 7, AND ,,Sp~CrAT.~ BUrrnI~G SUPPLIES AND HCME ~4P~OVMM~{/S" AS A CEM)ITION~TLY SU~41~T~D USE ~ SUBAREA 7 RE~F~rlv~LY - APN: 229-011-10, 19, 21, 26, 27, AND 28 ~he City Council of the City of Pand~o Cucamcnga does hereby crda/n as follows: attad~a Exhibit "A." ~: Part III, Table III-1, is hereby ~_m~a to r_~___a_, in w~rds ar~ figures, as shown in the attached Exhibit "B." permittea use within Subarea 7 as shown in the a~ Exhibit "C." ~[I.q~_~: Part III, Table III-2, Su~eectim D, land use type defini- Impforearms" are hereby added to read, in ~<xds and figures, as follows: ~ S1~VICE (IX~T: An intec3rated cluster of related a~ive service activities, ~a%ich typically irElu~e: gas stations; service alignments, brakes, oil d%rr3es, 1,,~icaticns, tune-upe, smog checks, of auto parts; and other related services. Services typically specifically prchibit~a. Auto Courts shall comply with the follc~ing a~ign criteria: - Maximm size: 4 acres. - Maximm ~ alcr~ a major cr ~ arterial street: 300 feet. - No access to the site will be permitted d/xBctly off any major Ordinance No. 496 - Service bays ar~ pump isla~ie shall ~e screened frcm all major and secora~y arterials th~ a ccmbinaticm of herins, land- - An app~priate c~inati~ of betins, larrU~cap~, and ar~hi- Of the site to m~n~m~ze the impact of the auto court uses fr~n pr~hibitad. - All signa~e sb~l be limited to signs appr~ved urr~r a UD~f~rm Sign ~. and installatic~ of specialty items, suc~ as paint, wall/flccr/wiraow and electrical supplies, b~th and kitahen fixtures ar~ supplies, mater~a~ and supplies. Activities sb~ll be ccrrh~tsd in enclceed buila~ncls of 25,000 sc]uare feet cr lees. Uses eccluded from tb~ SECT/~5: ~ Council firr~ that this ~ will not adversely sectira, paragraph, sentere, ~r ~a of this C=~nance be rer~ered ~r declared invalid by any final ~urt actira in a c~=t of ~ jurisdictim, ~ b~ eff~-t. s~TI~7: ~he Ma~= eb~ml sign this Ordinance and t~m City Clerk once in the Inland W~_-v D~]lv Bulletin, a ne~Mmper of gemral cirollatic~ publ~__-a in the City of C~tario, Calif~aa, and circulated in the C~ty of PASSe3, ~, arr] ~ this 3rd day of June, 1992. NOES: Ncrm Ordiiknnce No. 496 Page 3 Dennis L. Stout, Mayor I, DP~RA J. ADAMS, CITY cr~RK of the City of Rancho O_w~m~lc/a, Califc~Tda, ~ ~ ~ ~t ~ f~~ ~~ ~ ~ at a ~ ~ of ~ ~il of ~ ~ of ~ ~ ~ld ~ ~ 2~ ~y of ~y, 1992, ~ ~ f~ly ~ at a ~ ~ of ~ Ci~ ~il of ~ Ci~ of ~ ~ ~ m ~ 3M ~y of J~, 1992. ~~ ~ 4~ ~y of ~, ~92, at ~ ~, ~o~a. ~a J. ~, Ci~ Cl~k Ordinance No. 4~6 Page4 ~ NO. 496 Fage5 TABLe: III- 1 SIJMMARY OF LAND USE TYPE BY SUBAREA · PIItMII"rZ,~ USE + C:~NDII'IQNAI,.~.,i, I~EIIMiI'?'EO US{ NOYE: NO~-eF'~lrltell ',Jill NOt !Berg,ate4 MANUFACTURINql ' OFFICE PI:!OFESSIONAL., DESIGN i lIESEARCH ' ' ' O~ofeamona|/Oee,ln Servtcet ; · , ~ '~ ~ re*. ~ · i · + i ' +! · 4, 4,, · · WHOLESAL~r S'rOR~G8 · DISTI:IIBU'F10~ ~ ~,... i..t..~..t.,.,..i.!.~.,.,., .~., .":..-', · COMMERCIAL "'; ; Afilfllal Care Aalemltlv·/IJIIII TrMII llllle-411lle * AM·afire·lye / 1'~4·I Re·lit-MaIM Au',omo~ve Serve:· Court Amomet;fe Sef~ee Iratin ,---,u--.,...o,,..,v.,. ~'~ I~aidlet Coevectef'e Simile Yn ' IMIIRI u-~;.~-.-:, 14rfiael · · · · Om · l./emlnl IlealeR8~ I,.Bldlea I Me · .,..,..m, neueaee. u,, .~. .Ill Coe. e,~ee· has i Setmoo btaliOnSallaldleeael · · , E/Itlflllelll~WI Heavy EaQ,Ile14fil I. iet· I~ N.,..~.~,w.,, +~+~1~ r~:~ll.~. Scroe Omewat~ 4,, S.~eci_~i:':' ~':~_ljinq Su~_~l;es & -'~rr~ AldMmlllree C.,d111 ~ ! · · · I~ll· Sat·IT i I. ffilfly taffetet · III-tt~dldlttlll lift GI,,GIRIell IMMIIJqlt IllllMI"aIIRIIINIR ImilCt wills! ,r~ak, Str'e, MO-PIIvI~ Ave. Overtly Olall'llt r~qlly iReMerrill NO. ~96 P-age 6 SUBAREA 7 l. anct Use Designer, ton Indust. rtal Parse prtmary Funca:ton Subarea 7 occupies a, area cttrect. ly south of 1cooanti] Bou]evarcl wn~cn represem:s an ~mportant ~ancl use Oatwean the City' s I ndustrt al Ar~a and canna ty oriented non-Industrial a~a anti is a gateway to the City. A n~m,lor inOustrial, office, an~ connmrcial 4evelol~wmnt on approxin~mtely 300 acres is currently Wt ant n this area i s a unclergot ng pleased construeSt on. planned Civic Center which will include San Bernar¢ino County and Ct icy offices. peel teed Uses Custom )¢lnufacturing I.i gnt Manufacturtng A~mintstra~tve and Offtce Profeast ohal/Best gn Services Researcl~ Servt cat Light Wtmlesaleo Storage, But 14i ng Mat nt~nance Servt cat Business Supply Ratatl Sales and Senates Busi nest Su~ort Servt cat Camunt cmti on SePvt cat Eatlng and i~rlnldng EstaOltstmmn~s t Ftnanc el, Insurance and ~eal Estate Services Hotel / I~tel A(IIt fit strltt ve Ct vt C SePvtces F1 oN Contm'~l/US11 tty COPPt Condt tt anal Uses A&ltxIott ve lienS. m1 It, east ng AMt~metl we ~11 es AMt, OI0tt ve tel'v1 cl Salt1 oR C~nwentence $41es and $erv¢ces Entm'tml rmm~nt Fast Food $ml ms FeN and Beverage Sales MNt cal/Heal tn Care Se--t ces Personal $ervt Recrtatt on Fact l ttt es CM1 tufa1 Pul~l t c Asiamill y public Safety and Utility Services Welt gtous AsseoOly Automotive Service Couzt/ Spec~a~Y Bu~]d~n9 Supplies and Home Zmprovemen~s -XHle>tT RES~LLYfIONN0.91-275 A RESOI/3TION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANC~O COCAMiN?A, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING HISTORIC POINT OF INTEREST 91-02 DESIGNATING THE IAFDLRCADE STORE, ~ AT 11871 ~~. BOULEVARD, AS A POINT OF INTEREST AND CERF/FICATION OF A MITIGATED NEGAT/VE D~CLARAT/ON FOR DEMDLITIONOFTHE STRUCILRE -APN: 229-011-10 A. Recitals. (i) The City has filed an application for a Point of Interest as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Point of Interest is referred to as the "application." (ii) On September 5, 1991, the Historic Preservation C~umission of the City-of Rancho Cucamonga conduct~ a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) On Septenber 18, 1991, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on the date. (iv) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Cauncil of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find, determine and resolve as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part "A," of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. The application applies to approximately one acre of lara, basically a rectangular configuration, located on the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester (Orange) Avenue intersection. 3. Based upon the sukstantial evidence presented to this Council during the abo~e-referenced public hearing on Se~ 18, 1991, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, and pursuant to Section 2.24.090 of the Rancho Oacamonga Municipal Code, and pursuant to the Historic Preservation Cu~u~Hssion policy regarding landmark designation over an owner's objection, this Council hereby makes the following findings and facts: A. Historical and Oaltural Significance: Finding: 1. The proposed Point of Interest w-us connected with scmeone renowned, important, or a local personality. Resolution No. 91-275 Page 2 Fact/s: John B. T~Fourcade established an advanced and elaborate winemaking and grape-handling business in an era marked by failed attempts at such endeavors in the Rochester/Cucamonga area. Seemingly well known throughout the Cottnty, T aFourcade represents an important epoch and entrepreneurial spirit of this valley. Finding: 2. Tne architect or builder was important. Fact/s: In choosing J. N. Johnson to design and corstruct his winery complex, LaFourcade was one of few local property owners in the late teens-early 1920s to employ a contractor who was very well known in the County. Johnson constructed many large and impressive public and private buildings in San Bernardino, Redlands, and Colton. B. Historic Architectural and Engineering Significance: Finding: 1. The corstruction materials or engineerirg Interest are unusual or significant or uniquely effective. Fact/s: Although it b_--~ been altered, the main entrance of the building which is marked by a parapet and flanked with Corinthian pilasters, remains as a testament to a design palette created_ by T~Fourcade and C. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting: Finding: 1. The proposed Point of Interest in its location represents an es~hl ~ _~h_er~ a]ld familiar visual feature of the neighborhood, o~nity, or city. Fact/s: As a gas station, store, and restaurant, the subject structure stands as a 70-year-old nof~hle fixture in the ~xnity' s landscape. 4. Tnis Oouncil hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered for compliarx~ with the California Env~l Quality Act of 1970. If properly mitigat_~J__, the requested demolition of the T aFourcade Store would not re~,~re further envirorrental review and a mitigated Negative Declaration will be issued for such demolition. Resolution No. 91-275 Page 3 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Council hereby resolves that pursuant to Chapter 2.24 of the Rancho Cucamonga MUnicipal Code, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby approves, on the 18th day of September 1991, Point of Interest 91-02 for the laFourcade Store. The Council further adopts the following Conditions of Approval mitigating the requested demolition: 1) No demolition permits shall be issued for the existing ~%~ structures prior to the property owner's written acknowl- [4 L~dtC~t edgment and aoceptance of the Cultural Resource Mitigation Measures per the mitigated Negative Declaration; 2) The development of the site shall ~te details of 6~uJ~ the site's history, in particular the LaFourcade period, through the incorporation of the following measures: d-aogq~ oaLmdssioned public art and development and placement of interpretive public displays. The final specifications of such m~-~ures shall be reviewed by the Historic Preserva- review hearings on any development proposal for this site. Final approval of the appropriate public art and interpretive displays shall occur prior to the issuance of building 3) The decorative parapet at the north~-~t corner of the building dating frc~ the ~ourcade period shall be removed / using reasonable efforts during demolition. City staff shall be present during this demolition to inspect the u~. parapet. The parapet element or reproduction thereof shall ~ be considered for incorporation into the above public art or interpretive exhibit. The decorative parapet shall be documented per HABS/HAER ~, the final form of which shall be approved by the City Pl&nner prior to demolition 4) The developer shall contribute $10,000 to the Chaffey- Garcia House Barn project, which will be used to develop a museum/cultural center depicting and exhibiting the agricultural heritage of the area. The City Council may, upon the input of the Historic Preservation C~L,~ssion, allocate these funds to another similar type of preserva- tion project, including but not necessarily limited to, the Historic Preservation Site and Land-Banking Fund, depending upon the timing of the c~liance with this mitigation. Tnis~]Centernntribution shall be provided prior to the issuance of building permits of any ~ase of the Masi C~,erce ; P~solution No. 91-275 Page4 5) Tne site developer shall sponsor four Oral History inter- views of individuals knowledgeable of the LaFourcade/Masi era of significance. ~hese interviews, which shall not exceed a cost of $5,000.00, shall be conducted by a consultant approved by City staff. PASS~I), APP~, and ADOPTED this 18th day of September, 1991. AYES: Alexander, Buquet, Stout, Williams, Wright NO ES: None ABS~: None Dennis L. Stout, Mayor I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY c~.FRK of the City of Pancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopt_~ by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 18th day of September, 1991. Executed this 19th day of September, 1991 at Rancho Cu~nga, California. \ ~' ~! lr{!llllllllllll] ~qN_a,^v ~a~j c.~u,",n~ TYPICAL LUNCH COURT LUNCH AREA BLOW-UP gO O~ RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 91-24 FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF 32 BUILDINGS TOTALING APPROXIMATELY 268,907 SQUARE FEET AND COMPRISED OF A MIX OF INDUSTRIAL, MULTI-TENANT, OFFICE, AND RESTAURANT USES IN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK DISTRICT (SUBAREA 7) OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND ROCHESTER AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 229-011-10, 19, 21, 26, 27, AND 28. A. Recitals. (i) Masi Commerce Center Partners has filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use Permit No. 91-24 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application." (ii) On the 22nd day of July 1992, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on July 22, 1992, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at the southwest corner of Rochester and Foothill Boulevards with a street frcntage of 1,250 feet along Foothill Boulevard and lot depth of 950 feet along Rochester Boulevard and is presently improved with the vacant Cowgirl Saloon; and (b) The property to the north of the subject site is vacant, the property to the south consists of the Sports Complex which is currently under construction, the property to the east is the Aggozzotti Winery, and the property to the west is vacant. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 91-24-MASI COMMERCE CENTER PARTNERS July 22, 1992 Page 2 (c) The property is designated "Industrial Park" by the Industrial Area Specific Plan; and (d) The project requires the demolition of the Cowgirl Saloon, formerly known as the LaFourcade store and gas station. The structure was designated an Historic Point of Interest by the City Council on September 18, 1991. (e) An Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment was approved by the City Council on May 20, 1992, which modified circulation access points along Rochester Avenue, added "Automotive Service Court" as a conditionally permitted use and added "Building Supplies and Home Improvement" as a conditionally permitted use within Subarea 7. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code and the Industrial Specific Plan, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. (b) That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. (c) That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a mitigated Negative Declaration, 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planninq Division: 1) Pursuant to provisions of California Public Resources Code Section 21089(b), this application shall not be operative, vested, or final, nor will building permits be issued or a map recorded, until (1) the Notice of Determination (NOD) regarding the associated environmental action is filed and posted with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of the PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 91-24-MASI COMMERCE CENTER PARTNERS July 22, 1992 Page 3 County of San Bernardino; and (2) any and all required filing fees assessed pursuant to California Fish and Game Code Section 711.4, together with any required handling charges, are paid to the County Clerk of the County of San Bernardino. The applicant shall provide the Planning Department with a stamped and conformed copy of the Notice of Determination together with a receipt showing that all fees have been paid. In the event this application is determined exempt from such filing fees pursuant to the provisions of the California Fish and Game Code, or the guidelines promulgated thereunder, except for payment of any required handling charge for filing a Certificate of Fee Exemption, this condition shall be deemed null and void. 2) A diagram providing color locations for the mylar/canvas canopies shall be submitted for review and approval by the Design Review Committee prior to the issuance of building permits. 3) A reflective coating shall be applied to the glass portions of those buildings which face drive aisles and Rochester Avenue. The purpose of the reflective coating is to provide an opaqueness to the glass so that interior storage areas will not be visible. 4) Vines planted along the Sports Complex property (south of the south property wall) shall be allowed to extend up and over the wall and onto the buildings in order to discourage graffiti and to soften the wall and buildings, if acceptable to the Community and Park Development Department. 5) The bullnose edge for all buildings with the 4- inch stucco recess shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. 6) The applicant shall provide a stone base along the bottom portion of the Buildings 4, 7, and 20 in those locations where glass extends all PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 91-24-MASI COMMERCE CENTER PARTNERS July 22, 1992 Page 4 the way to the ground. Detailed drawings shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. 7) Final detailed plans for the commissioned public art and the interpretlye public displays shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of any permits. Installation of the public art and the Vintner's Walkway shall be completed concurrently with Foothill Boulevard improvements. 8) The developer shall contribute $100,000 to the Chaffey-Garcia House Barn project, which will be used to develop a museum/cultural center depicting and exhibiting the agricultural heritage of the area. The City Council may, upon the input of the Historic Preservation Commission, allocate funds to another similar type of preservation project including, but not necessarily limited to, the Historic Preservation Site and Land-Banking fund, depending upon the timing of the compliance with this mitigation. This contribution shall be provided prior to the issuance of building permits of any phase of the Masi Commerce Center. 9) Landscaping along the entirety of Masi Drive from the sidewalk out to the curb face shall be completed prior to occupancy of the last building for Phase 1. 10) A trash enclosure shall be provided for Building 5. 11) The trash enclosure for Building 3 (Jack-In- The-Box) shall be located closer to the building. 12) If it is determined that the Victory Chapel facility will be located in Building 14, it shall be verified in writing that Parcel 13 will not require parking spaces on Sunday morning (or during the hours of operation for Victory Chapel) so that the proposed reciprocal parking arrangement can be implemented. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 91-24-MASI COMMERCE CENTER PARTNERS July 22, 1992 Page 5 13) The streetscape treatment (i.e., landscape, furniture, and hardscape) shall comply with the requirements and guidelines of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Design Supplement. The detailed landscape/irrigation and street improvement plans shall reflect this requirement to the satisfaction of the Planning and Engineering Divisions prior to the issuance of building permits. 14) All parking spaces fronting Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue shall be screened through the use of berming, low walls, evergreen shrub hedgerows, or a combination thereof, to the satisfaction of the Planning Division. 15) There shall be provision for the following design features in the trash enclosure to the satisfaction of the City Planner: a) Architecturally integrated into the design of the center. b) Separate pedestrian access that does not require opening the main doors, to include self-closing pedestrian door. c) Large enough to accommodate two trash bins. d) Roll-up doors. e) Trash bins with counterweighted lids. f) Architecturally treated overhead shade trellis. g) Chain link screen on top to prevent trash from blowing out of enclosure and designed to be hidden from view. 16) A uniform hardscape and street furniture treatment, including trash receptacles, free- standing potted plants, bike racks, light bollards, benches, etc., shall be utilized for the project and shall be designed to be compatible with the architectural style. Detailed designs shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 91-24-MASI COMMERCE CENTER PARTNERS July 22, 1992 Page 6 17) Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours. 18) All future building pads shall be temporarily seeded and irrigated for erosion control. Detailed plans shall be included in the landscape and irrigation plans to be submitted for City Planner approval prior to issuance of building permits. 19) The entire site shall be kept free of trash and debris at all times, and in no event shall trash and debris remain for more than 24 hours. 20) A Uniform Sign Program shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. Buildinq and Safety Division: 1) Provisions shall be made to resolve to the satisfaction of the Building Official the following issues relative to installation of new walls in close proximity to existing walls: a) Structural loads from new walls (vertical and horizontal) shall not be allowed to be transferred to existing walls. b) Backfill of gaps created between new and existing walls shall be undertaken so as not to exceed the design capabilities of existing walls. c) An impermeable surface shall be provided at the top of the existing lower wall to prevent water from penetrating the backfill. d) Weep holes shall be added to existing walls to provide drainage of the backfill. Enqineerinq Division: 1) The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications) on the project side of Rochester Avenue shall be undergrounded from the first pole off-site south of the project's south boundary to and including the end-of- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 91-24-MASI COMMERCE CENTER PARTNERS July 22, 1992 Page 7 line pole just south of Foothill Boulevard, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. The service to the existing structure on the east side of Rochester Avenue shall be undergrounded across Rochester Avenue to the pole on the east side of the street. Services to the existing structures on-site from the east side of Rochester Avenue shall be undergrounded as well. In addition, an in- lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the utilities on the opposite side of Rochester Avenue shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of building permits. The fee shall be one-half the difference between the undergrounding cost of the utilities (electrical, except for 66 KV electrical) on the opposite side of the street minus those (telecommunications} on the project side times the length from the center of Foothill Boulevard to the south project boundary (990~ feet). 2) Foothill Boulevard shall be constructed as follows, subject to modification by and approval of Caltrans, with Phase I: a) Full improvements on the south side from Rochester Avenue to the west project boundary including a continuous right turn lane beginning 230 feet west of the Foothill driveway. b) A landscaped median between Rochester Avenue and "B" Street with left turn lanes to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. If Caltrans does not allow a single segment, in-lieu fees will be required in conformance with Condition 3. c) Thirty-two feet of pavement on the north side of the median. d)-A catch basin at the ultimate low point on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, sized per the final drainage study, with an interim lateral to the catch basin on the south side. The north right-of-way shall be graded to direct flows to the catch basin with desilting facilities to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 91-24-MASI COERCE CENTER PARTNERS July 22, 1992 Page 8 e) Transitions to existing pavement west of the' west project boundary to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and CalTrans. f) The Developer may request a reimbursement agreement for permanent improvements north of the centerline, including half of the landscaped median costs, from future development as it occurs on the north side of the street. 3) An in-lieu fee as contribution to the future construction of the median island within Foothill Boulevard shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of building permits for Phase I or approval of the Final Parcel Map, whichever occurs first. The amount of the fee shall be one-half the cost of the median times the length from the west project boundary to a projection of the westerly right-of-way line for "B" Street. If CalTrans does not allow construction of the median in condition 2) b), the fee limits shall extend to a projection of the westerly right-of-way line for Rochester Avenue. 4) Rochester Avenue shall be constructed per approved Drawing No. 1431 with Phase 1, unless completed by others. In addition, sidewalks, street trees and a combined bus bay/right turn lane north of the project driveway shall be installed. The right turn lane shall begin as close to the Foothill Boulevard intersection as possible. 5) All public storm drains and interior public street improvements shall be constructed with Phase I. 6) Public street sump conditions shall be designed as follows: a) Provide an overflow route from "A" Street to the south project boundary and a method for those flows to pass through the perimeter wall in the event of blockage in the catch basins (method shown on the conceptual grading plan has not been reviewed). PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 91-24-MASI COERCE CENTER PARTNERS July 22, 1992 Page 9 b) Provide an overflow route from Foothill Boulevard to either "B" Street or Rochester Avenue in the event of blockage in the Foothill catch basin and provide additional catch basin capacity on Foothill Boulevard to minimize the possibility of blockage to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. c) Provide surface drainage easements and drainage acceptance agreements allowing public water to enter private property from both "A" Street and Foothill Boulevard. 7) The public storm drain in Foothill Boulevard and "B" Street shall be upsized to accommodate interim undeveloped flows from the north side of Foothill Boulevard, per the final drainage study, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The minimum diameter for permanent public storm drain mains is 24 inches. 8) Construct the earthen berm north of Foothill Boulevard, as designed for the Sports Complex, with Phase I, unless completed by others. 9) An in-lieu fee as contribution to the future installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and "B" Street shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of building permits for Phase I or approval of the Final Parcel Map, whichever occurs first. The amount of the fee shall be one half the cost of the signal. 10) Parkway improvements along Foothill Boulevard shall conform to the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Design Supplement, to the satisfaction of the City Planner and City Engineer. 11) An in-lieu fee for one-fourth the cost of constructing special pavers within the Foothill Boulevard/Rochester Avenue intersection shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of building permits for Phase I. The fee amount shall be based on the square footage of the intersection. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 91-24-MASICOMMERCE CENTER PARTNERS July 22, 1992 Page 10 12) Modify the traffic signal at the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue as needed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 13) A public sidewalk easement shall be provided, with an encroachment/maintenance agreement for the plaques, overhead arcade, and other features south of the Foothill Boulevard right-of-way between Rochester Avenue and the project driveway. The agreement shall hold the City harmless for damage to or liability from privately maintained special features. The agreement shall be recorded prior to or concurrent with the Final Parcel Map. 14) All drive approaches shall conform to City Standards. Larger radii (up to 20 feet maximum) may be used when transitioning from a 40-foot width at the right-of-way to lesser aisle widths on-site, as shown on the approved plans, for "B" Street driveways in particular- 15) "No parking/Stopping" shall be posted on all public street frontages- 16) No portion of the "Vintner's Walk," including the seat wall, shall encroach on the Foothill Boulevard right-of-way- 17) Provide hardscape to the curb in the bus boarding area along Rochester Avenue. 18) Sidewalk shall cross drive approaches at the zero curb face. Handicap ramps are only required at street intersections- Cross walks shall conform to City Standards. 19) The areas tributary to Rochester Avenue and the Sports Complex storm drain system shall be adjusted as necessary in the Final Drainage Study so that flows will not exceed the capacity of the existing downstream system. 20) The section of "B" Street between Foothill Boulevard and the 4-way driveway intersection 200 feet south of Foothill Boulevard shall be 56 feet curb-to-curb, to accommodate four traffic lanes. Provide a 40 mph transition for the outer lanes south of the 4-way driveway intersection- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 91-24-MASI COMMERCE CENTER PARTNERS July 22, 1992 Page 11 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF JULY 1992. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22nd day of July 1992, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: SUBJECT: Those items checked are Conditions of Approval. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (714) 989-1861, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. Time Limits V/1. Approval shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, if building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 24 months from the date of approval. 2. Development/Design Review shall be approved prior to ! / , 3. Approval of Tentative Tract No. is granted subject to the approval of 4. The deveioper shall comrnence, partioipate in, and consurnmate or cause to be commenced, / / participated in, or consummated, a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District (CFD) for the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Distdct to finance construction and/or maintenance of a fire station to sense the development. The station shall be located, designed, and built to all specifications of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and shall become the Districrs property upon completion. The equipment shall be selected by the District in accordance with its needs. In any building of a station, the developer shall comply with all applicable laws and regulations. The CFD shall be formed by the District and the developer by the time recordation of the final map occurs. 5. Prior to recordation of the final map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes / / first, the applicant shall consent to, or participate in, the establishment of a Melio-Roos Community Facilities District for lhe construction and maintenance of necessary school facilities. However, if any school district has previously established such a Community Facilities District, the applicant shall, in the alternative, consent to the annexation of the project site into the territory of such existing District pdor to the recordation of the final map or the issuance ol building permits, whichever comes first. Further, if the affected school district has not formed a Melio-Roos Community Facilities District within twelve months from the date of approval of lhe project and prior to the recordation of the final map or issuance of building permits for said project, this condition shall be deemed null and void. SC - 2/91 I of 12~-~' d'd7 ComDle~<~n Ds~: This condition shall be waived if the C~ receives notice that fhe applicanf and all affected school districts have emered into an agreemenl to privately accommodafe any and all school impacts as 8 resul~ of this proiect. V//6. Prior to recerdation of the final map or prior to issuance of building permits when no map is __./ / involved, writlen cerlification from the affected water dimri~ fhat adequate sewer and waler facilities are or will be available to serve the proposed project shall be submitted to the Department of Community Developmere. Such le~ler must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subcl ivision or prior to issuance of permits in the case of all other residential proje~s. B. Site Development V//* 1. The site shall be developed and mainrained in accordance with the appmved plans which / / include site plans, architectural elevations. exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions comained herein, Development Code regulations, and ,,~'~ ,d, uLS.-Fri '~-~{ Specific Plan.and' 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all / / Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 3. OccupancyofthefadlityshallnotcommenceuntilsuchtimeasallUnfformBuildingCodeand / / State Fire Marshall's regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division to show compliance. The building shall be inspected for compliance pdor to occupancy. V/ 4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be / / submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. y/5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvemere plans shall be coordinated for ----/ / consistency pdorto issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment building, etc.), or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. V/ 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development / / Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community Plans or Specific Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. ~//7. A detailed on-site lighting plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner and / / Sheriff's Department (989-6611 ) pdor to the issuance of building permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. 8. If no centralized trash receptacles am provided, all trash pick-up shall be for individual units __/ / with all receptacles shielded from public view. t//9. Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations / / and the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. V// 10. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be ioc, ated out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner. SC - 2/91 2 or 12 ~ ~/~ Project No.: Completic~n Da~e: 11. Street names shall be submitted for City Planner review ancl approval in accordance with __/ the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to apOroval ot the final map. 12. All building numl~ers anO individual units shall be iclentitied in a clear anO concise manner, / / including proper illumination. 13. A detailed plan indicating trail widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing, and .__J / weed control, in accordance with City Master Trail drawings, shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval priorto approval and recordation of the Final Tract Map and prior to approval of street improvement and grading plans. Developer shall upgrade and construct all trails, including fencing and drainage devices, in conjunction with street improvements. 14. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs) shall not prohibit the keeping of equine / / animals where zoning requirements for the keeping of said animals have been met. Individual lot owners in subdivisions shall have the option of keeping said animals without the necessity of appealing to boards of directors or homeowners' associations for amendments to the CC&Rs. 15. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the / Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Divisions and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of building permits. whichever occurs first. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer· 16. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping sha" be permanently maintained by the property / / owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 17. Solar access easements shall be dedicated for the purpose of assuming that each lot or / /'- dwelling unit shall have the right to receive sunlight across adjacent lots or units for use of a solar energy system. The easements may be contained in a Declaration of Restrictions for the subdivision which shall be recorded concurrently with the recordation of the final map or issuance of permits, whichever comes first. The easements shall prohibit the casting of shadows by vegetation, structures, fixtures or any other object, except for utility wires and similar objects. pursuant to Development Code Section 17.08.060-G-2. 18. The project contains a designated Historical Landmark. The site shall be developed and / / maintained in accordance with the Historic Landmark Alteration Permit No. · Any further modifications to the site including, but not limited to, extedor alterations and/or interior alterations which affect the exterior of the buildings or structures, removal of landmark trees, demolition, relocation, reconstruction of buildings or structures, or changes to the site, shall require a modification to the Historic Landmark Alteration Permit subject to Historic Preservation Commission review and approval. C. Building Design 1. An alternative energy system is required to provide domestic hot water for all dwelling units / / and for heating any swimming pool or spa, unless other alternative energy systems are demonstrated to be of equivalent capacity and efficiency. All swimming pools installed at the time of initial development shall be supplemented with solar heating. Details shall be included in the building plans and shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. All dwellings shall have the front. side and rear elevations upgraded with architectural / /- treatment. detailing and increased delineation of surface treatment subject to City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. SC-2/9! 3of'12 ~----__~/~ ~ 3. Standard patio cover plans for use by the Homoowners' Association shall be submitted for / / GiW Planner and Building Official review and approves prior to issuance of building permits. 4. All root apOurtenar~es, including air conditionam and other roof mounted equipfront and/or / / projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered trom adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Division. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Details shall be included in building plans. D. Parking and Vehicular Access (Indicate details on building plans) 1. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall / / contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curb). V/' 2. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be / / provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/ plazas/recreational uses. 3. All parking spaces shall be double stdped per City standards and all driveway aisles, / / entrances, and exits shall be stdped per City standards. 4. All units shall be provided with garage door openers if driveways are less than 18 feet in / / depth from back of sidewalk. 5. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions shall restdct the storage of recreational vehicles / /.- on this site unless they are the principal source of transportation lor the owner and prohibit parking on interior circulation aisles other than in designated visitor parking areas. 6. Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the City Planner, City Engineer, and / / Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval pdor to issuance of building permits. E. Landscaping (for publicly maintained landscape areas, refer to Section N.) V/' 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscap- / l- ing in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval priorto the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. 2. Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barder / / in accordance with the Municipal Code Section 19.08.110, and so noted on the grading plans. The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans. The applicant shall follow all of the aroorist's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting and tdmming methods. 3. Aminimumof treespergrossacre,compdsedofthefoliowingsizes, shall be Provided / within the project: % - 48- inch box or larger, % - 36- inch box or larger, __ % - 24- inch box or larger, __ % - 15-gallon, and __ % - 5 gallon. 4. A minimum of % of trees planted within the project shall be specimen size trees - / /- 24-inch box or larger. 5. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three / / parking stalls, sufficient to shade 50% of the parking area at solar noon on August 21. SC - 2/9 1 4 of 12 ~J~'~/, (~ / 6. Trees ~hall ~ plam~ in areas of public view adjacem to and alon~ statures at a rate of one tr~e per 80 linear t~t of ~i~i~. / / ~ 7. AIIpr~ates~pebanks5leetorlessinven~alhe~hta~of5:l orgreaters~,butle~than / / 2:1 s~, shall be, at minimum, i~ated a~ lands~ w~h a~ropdate grou~ ~ver for ems~n ~ntrol. SIo~ pla~i~ requir~ by this s~n shall i~lude a pe~ane~ i~igat~n sy~em to ~ installed by the deveb~r p~r to ~u~n~. I P ~P~A ~ / 8. AIIprivates~sinexcessof5feet, but less than 8 feet inve~alhe~andof2:l orgreater / /.-- s~ shall be la~sc~d a~ iffigat~ for eros~n ~mrol a~ to so~en their a~ara~e as fol~ws: one 15-galbn or la~er size tree ~r each 150 ~. ~. of s~ area, 1 ~al~n or larger s~e shrub ~r each 100 ~. ~. of s~ area, and ~mpriate grou~ ~ver. In a~ion, slo~ banks in excess of 8 feet in ve~al height a~ of 2:1 or greater s~ shall al~ i~lude one 5-galen or larger size tree ~r each 250 ~. ~. of sb~ area. Trees a~ shrubs shall ~ plamed in stagered clusters to ~ffen a~ va~ s~ plane. SIo~ pla~i~ r~uir~ by this s~ion shall i~lude a ~rmane~ i~at~n system to ~ in~all~ by the develo~r pr~r to cupa~y. t P 9. For sidle family res~e~ial deve~pment, all s~ plami~ a~ i~gatbn shall be ~ntinu- / / ous~ maintain~ in a hea~hy a~ thdvi~ ~itbn by the deve~r umil each i~ividual un~ is ~ a~ cupled by the ~yer. P~rto releasi~ o~pa~yfort~ un~s, an insulin shall ~ ~u~ by the Planning DMsion to dete~ine that they are in sati~a~o~ ~it~n. ~ 10. For mull-family res~e~ial and ~n-res~ential devebpme~, pm~ ownera are resin- / / sible for the ~ntinual mimena~e of all la~~ areas on-s~e, as well as ~m~uous plam~ areas w~hin the ~blic r~ffi~f-way. All la~~ areas shall ~ ke~ free from we~s a~ debds a~ mi~ai~ in a hea~hy a~ lh~i~ ~itbn, a~ shall receive regular pruning, fenil~i~, mwi~, a~ tdmmi~. Any damaged, dead, disease, or de~ying plato material shall ~ replac~ w~hin 30 days from the date of damage. 11. Front ya~ la~ing shall ~ r~uir~ ~r the Devebpm~ ~e a~/or / /__ . ~is r~uim~nt shall be in a~itbn to the r~uired street trees a~ s~ plainly. ~12. ~e final des~n of the ~ter pa~ays, walls, la~i~, a~ s~ewalks shall be / / i~lud~ in the r~ir~ la~ plans a~ shall ~ su~ to C~ Planner review a~ ~mval and ~inat~ for ~nsiste~ w~h a~ ~ay la~i~ plan wh~h my ~ required by the E~ineedng Divisbn. /13. S~ial la~s~ fea~res s~h ~ mu~ing, alluvial ~, ~imen size trees, meander- / /.-- i s~ewalk~ (with ~r~o~al cha~e), a~ intens~i~ ' ' ' a~ -~- ' ' ~ 14. La~i~ a~ imgatbn syste~ requir~ to ~ in~al~ w~hin the ~blic ~ffi~f-way on / /__ the perimeter of th~ pmj~ area shall ~ ~minuous~ maintain~ by the deve~per. ~ 15. All walls shall ~ pm~d~ w~h de~rative treatment. If ~t~ in ~bi~ maimena~e areas, / / the des~n shall ~ ~ffiinated with the E~i~ed~ D~is~n. ~ 16. Tree maimenan~ cffieria shall be deve~ a~ subm~ for C~y Planner review a~ / / ~roval p~r to issua~e of ~ildi~ ~s. ~se cffieda shall e~urage the natural gro~h ~ara~ed~s of the sel~ tree ~ies. ~17. La~i~ and i~at~n shall ~ des~ to ~n~Ne water through the pri~iples of / /-- Xed~ as defin~ in Cheer 19.16 of the Ran~o Cu~nga Mun~i~l C~e. SC-2/91 5or12 ~ F, SIgns 1, ThesignsindicatedonthesubmittedplansareconceptualonlyandnotaPartofthisaPProval. / /--" Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation of any signS. 2. AUniformSignprogramforthisdevelopmentshallbesubmittedforCitYPlanner reviewand / / approval pdor to issuance of building permits. 3. Directop/monument sign(s) shall be provided for apartment, condominium, or townhomes / -/ prior to occupancy and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Division pdor to issuance of building permits. , G. Environmental 1. The developor shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Fourth Street Rock / / Crusher project in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 2. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the City Adopted / /- Special Studies Zone for the Red Hill Fault, in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 3. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Foothill Freeway / / project in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, pdor to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 4. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the / / issuance of building permits. The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and construction techniques provided, and it appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures. The building plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report. H. Other Agencies v/ 1. EmergencysecondaryaccessshallbeprovidedinaccordancewithRanchoCucarn°ngaFire J / Protection District Standards. 2. Emergency access shall be provlded, maintenance lree andclear, a minimumof26feetwide / / at all times during construction in accordance with Rancho Cucarnonga Fire Protection District requirements. V/3. Prior to issuance of building permits for combustible construction. evidence shall be / .J · submitted to the Rancho Cucamenga Fire Protection District that ternporary water supply for fire protection is available, pending completion of required fire protection system. V/4. The applicant shall contact the U. S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and / .J location of mail boxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid ovemead structure for mail boxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mail boxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. For projects using septic tank facilities, written certification of acceptability, including all//- supportive information, shall be obtained from the San Bemardino County Department of Environmental Health and submitted to the Building Official pdor to the issuance of Septic Tank Permits, and prior to issuance of building permits. 2/91 6 of 12 ~'~ 7/ APPLICANT~ ~HALL CONTACT THE BUILDIN~ AND ~AF~Y DIVISION, ~14) 98~-1~3, ~OR COMPLIANCE ~ ~E ~OLLOWIN~ CONDITIONS: I. SRe Develo~ent ~ 1. The ~pl~a~ shall ~ly w~h the latesl a~pl~ Un~o~ Bui~i~ C~e, Un~o~ Meohani- / / 081 O~e, Un~orm Plumbi~ ~e, Nal~n81 EI~ ~e, a~ all other 8~li~ble ~des, ordinates, 8~ r~ulal~ns in e~ at the ti~ of isaua~e of relative ~rmits. Please co~8~ the Bui~i~ a~ 88fe~ DMs~n for ~pies of the C~e A~pt~n O~ina~e a~ ~l~able han~uts. 2. Prbr to issuan~ of ~i~i~ perils for a new res~ential ~elli~ un~(s) or mawr a~n / / to existi~ unR(s), the 8~1i~ 8h811 pay deve~p~nt fees at the establiah~ rate. ~ch fees may i~lude, but are mt lim~ ~o: G~ Beaut~at~n Fee, Pa~ Fee, Drainage Fee, Systems Deve~pment Fee, Pe~ a~ Plan Ch~ki~ Fees, a~ ~1 Fees. ~3. Pr~r to i~ua~e of ~i~ing ~Rs for a new ~mmercial or i~ust~81 developmenl or / /.__ a~ition to an existi~ deve~p~, the ~li~ shall ~y deve~pme~ fees at the est~lished rate. Such fees may i~lude, ~ are ~t lim~ to: 8yste~ Deve~pment Fee, Drainage Fee, ~ol Fees, Perm~ and Plan Ch~ki~ Fees. 4. Street a~resses shall ~ pmvid~ by the Bui~i~ ~ial, a~er tra~rcel ~p r~rdation / a~ p~r to i~ua~e of ~i~i~ ~s. J, Exi~lng ~ru~ura 1. Pmv~e ~lia~e w~h the Un~o~ Bui~i~ C~e br the pmpe~ line cleara~es / / ~ns~ed~ use, area, a~ fim-resi~ene~ of existi~ ~i~i~s, 2. Existi~ ~i~ings shall ~ rode to ~ w~h ~ ~i~i~ a~ zoni~ r~ulat~ns for / / the ime~ use or the ~ildi~ shall ~ demlis~. 3. Exi~i~ sewage di~sal families shall ~ m~v~, fill~ a~or c~ to ~ly with the / /-- Un~o~ Plumi~ C~e a~ Un~o~ Bui~i~ ~e, 4. U~e~mu~ on-s~e mil~ies are to be ~at~ a~ s~wn on ~i~ing plans subm~ for / / ~i~i~ ~ ~li~t~n. K, Grading 1. Gradi~ ol the su~e~ pm~Ry shall ~ in a~rda~e w~h the Un~o~ ~i~i~ ~e, C~ / /-- Gradi~ Sta~ards, a~ a~e~ gradi~ pra~i~s, ~e final gr~ing plan shall ~ in substantial ~o~n~ w~h the ~v~ gr~i~ ~an. / 2. A soils re~ shall ~ Fepar~ by a qualilied engineer I~ens~ by the State of Cal~omia to / / ~o~ such wo~. ~ 3. ~e devebpmem is ~t~ w~hin t~ ~il emsbn Pe~ is r~uired. Please ~ma~ San Bemrdi~ ~u~ ~paRmem of Ag~'~um at (714) ~7-2111 for pe~ ~li~t~n, ~mma~n of ~ ~ shall ~ subm~ to the C~y p~r to the issua~e of rough gradi~ ~, 4. A g~l rein shall ~ prepar~ by a qual~i~ e~ineer or g~ist a~ subm~ed at / the time of a~l~t~n for gradi~ plan ch~. / 5. ~efinalgradi~plansshall~mplet~a~pmv~rtoissua~eof~i~i~rm~s. / /-- ~-2/91 70r12 6. As a custom-lot subdivision, the lollowing requirements shall be met: a. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed guaranteeing completion of all on-site ----/ /- drainage facilities necessary for alewatering all parcels to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Division priorto final map approval and prior to the issuance of grading permits. b. ADpropdate easements for safe disposal of drainage water that are conducted onto ---/ / or over adjacent parcels, are to be delineated and recorded to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Division prior to issuance of grading and building permits. c. On-site drainage improvements, necessaff for dewatering and protecting the subdivided / / properties, are to be installed prior to issuance of building permits for construction upon any parcel that may be subject to drainage flows entering, leaving, or within a parcel relative to which a building permit is requested. d. Final grading plans for each parcel are to be submitted to the Building and Safety / /.- Division for al~roval priorto issuance of building and grading permits. (This may be on an incremental or composite IDasis.) e. All slope banks in excess of 5 feet in vertical height shall be seeded with native grasses -/ / or planted with ground cover for erosion control upon completion of grading or some other alternative method of erosion control shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Building Official. In addition a permanent irrigation system shall be provided. This requirement does not release the applioant/deveioper from corrkoliance with the slope planting requirements of Section 17.08.040 I ol the Development Code. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DNISION, (714) 989-1862, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: L. Dedication and Vehicullr Accesl 1. Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets. / / community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, and public drainage facilities as shown on the ~ans and/or tentative map. Private easemania for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc.) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. V//' 2. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets / (measured from street canrecline): total feet on total feet on 3. An irrevocable offer of dedication for -foot wide roadway easement Shall be made ---/ / for all private streets or drives. 4. Non-vehicular access shall be dedicated to the City for the tollowing streets: ./ /- 5. Reciprocal access easements shall be provk:led ensuring access to all parcels by CC&Rs or Oy deeds and shall be recorcled concurrently with the ma,O or prior to the issuance of building permits, where no map is involved. ~' 7.~ sc - 2/9t e or 12 J_______.6. Private drainage easements for cross-tot drainage shall be provpded and snail be delineated or noted on the final map. 7.The final map shall clearly delineate a 1 O-foot minimum building restr~lon area on the neighboring lot adjoining the zero lot line wall and contain the following language: '//We hereby dedicate to the City of Rancho Cucarnonga the right to prohibit the construction of (residential) buildings (or other structures) within those areas designated on the maf~ as building restriction areas.' A maintenance agreement shall also be granted trom each lot to the adjacent lot through the CC&R's. 8. All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be quitclaimed or delineated on / / the final map. 9. Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of-way / /__ shall be dedicated to the City wherever they encroach onto private property. 10. Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right turn lanes, to provide a minimum / of 7 feet measured from the face of curos. ff ¢u~ adjacent sidewalk is used along the right turn lane, a parallel street tree maintenance easement shall be provided. ' ¢ 11. The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site property interests / / necessary to construct the required public improvements, and it he/she should fail to do so, the developer shall, at least 120 days prior to subl'nittal of the final map for approval, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Government Cede' Section 66462 at such time as the City aocluires the property interests required lot the improvements. Such agreement shall provide for payment by the developer of all costs incurred by the City to acquire the off-site property interests required in connection with the sul:x:livision. Security for a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the devek:q:>er, at developers cost. The appraiser shall have been approved by the City prlorlo commencement ol the appraisal. M. Slreet Improvement= 1. All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, / /__ landscaped areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Slandarcls. Interior street improvements shall include, I:xJt are not limited to, curo and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewaks, street lights, and street trees. 2. A minimum of 26- foot wide pavement, within a 40 -foot wide cledicated right.of-way shall be / / construcled for all half-Section streets. 3. Construct the following perfneter street improvements including, txzt not limited to: j STREET NAME CURB & A.C. SIDE DRIVE STREET STREET COMM. MEDIAN OTHER GUTTER! FVMT WAL~ , ~ UG!-r~ TREES TRAIL SI. AND Fooled, ¢' ,/' ,/' ¢' V' v.' v' C. v" ¢' ¢' 2/91 9of I2 Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irngation on meter. (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) It so marked, s~e- walk shall be curvilinear per STD. 304. (cl) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction lee shall be provided for this item./8'%, r~'{kl,,+' -h,~,r'P, ~CtN,4, ~ ~¢i de wo~/ - j I V/~f4. Improvement plans and construction: a. Street improvement plans including street trees and street lights, prepared by a regis- / tered Civil Engineer, shall be sulkmined to and approved by the City Engineer. Secudty shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction ot the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion ol the pu~ic and/or pdvate street improve- ments, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-or-way, tees shall be paid and a / / construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineers Office in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic, street name signing, and interconnect conduit / / shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conclu it with pull boxes shall be installed on any new construction or reconstruction / / of major, secondary or collector streets which intersect with other major, secondary or collector streets for future traffic signals. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 teet outside of BCR, ECR or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: / (1) AJI pull boxes shall be No. 6 unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. (2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pullrope. / /__ e. Wheel chair ramps shall be installed on all four corners ot intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with / /- adequate detours during construction. A street closure permit may be recluireq. A cash clepeSt shall be I:xovided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refundeq upon corrlpletion of the construction to ~ sailaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewaks. Under sidewalk drains shall be / / installed to City Slam, except tot single family lots, h. Handicap access ramp design shall be as specified by the City Engineer, / / i. Street names shall be appmved by the City Planner prior to subrnittal for first plan check. / / 5. Street in'q:N'ovemant I:Mns par City Standan:Is for all private streets shall de provided for / /- review and approval by the City Engineer. Prior to any work being parformed on the pri- vate streets, fees shall be paid and construction parrnits shall be ol)lainecl from the City Engineers Office in addition to any other parmils recluired. ~ 6 Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed par City Standards in / /_ accorclance with the City's street tree program. 2/91 !Oof 12 ~/~" 7. Intersection line of site designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer tor conformance wlth adopted policy. /__ a. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, /"/- including driveways. Walls, signs, and slopes shall be located outside the lines of sight. Landscaping and other obstructions within the lines of sight shall be approved by the City Engineer. b. Local residential street intersections shall have their noticeability improved, usually by / / moving the 2 +/- closest street trees on each side away from the street and placed in a street tree easement. V//' 8. A permit shall be obtained from CALTRANS for any work within the following right-of-way: / / 9. All public improvements on the following streets shall be operationally complete pdor to the /--/ issuance of building permits: N. Public Maintenance Areas L// 1. A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards / /'- shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval pdor to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. The following landscape parkways, medians, paseos, easements, trails, or other areas are required to be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance District: V/' 2. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting / /.__ Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer pdorto final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. y"'/' 3. All required public landscaping and irrigation systems shall be continuously maintained by the / /- developer umil accepted by the C~. 4. Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the re,suits of the respective / / Beautification Master Ran: O. Drainage rand Flood Control V/ 1. The project (or portions thereof) is located within a Flood Hazard Zone; therefore, flood / / protection measures shall be provided as certified by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer. 2. It shall be the developers responsibility to have the current FIRM Zone // designation removed from the project area. The developers engineer shall prepare all necessary reports, plans, and hydrologic, fhydraulic calculations. A Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) shall be obtained from FEMA p41or to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichaver occurs first. A Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) shall be issued by FEMA prior to occupancy or improvement acceptance, whichever occurs first. V/' 3. A final drainage study shall be sjbmitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final --/-- map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichaver occurs lirst. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. SC - 2/91 I I or 12 4. A permit from the County Flood Control District is required for work within rts rignt-ol-way.t Vlf 5. Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk. / / 6. Public storm drain easements shall be graded to convey oVedlows in the event of a ----/ blockage in a sump catch basin on the public: street. P. Utilities V// 1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, / J gas, electric power, telephone, and cable 'IV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. V/ 2, The developor shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. / / V/' 3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the ---J / Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CCWD is required pdor to final map approval or issuance ol permits, whichever occurs first. Q. General Requirements and ApprovaLs / / V/ 1. The separate parcels contained within the project beundaries shall be legally combined into one parcel prior to issuance of building permits. 2. An easement for a joint use ddveway shall be provided prior to final map approval or / issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first, for: /___/ _ 3. Prior to apC}roval of the final map a deposit shall be posted with the City covedng the estimated cost of apportioning the assessments under Assessment District among the newly created parcels. 4. Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Regional Mainline, Secondary Regional, and Master Plan J / Drainage Fees shall be paid prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved. 5. Permits shall be or}rained from the following agencies for work within their right-of-way: / / 6. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the Law Enforcement Comrttsnity ./ /- Facilities District shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever Occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the Developer. 7. Prior to finalization of any development phase, sufficient intpmvement plans shall be corn- / J~ pieted beyond the phase boundaries to assure secondary access and draina;e protection to the SatiSfaCtion of the City Engineer. Phase boundaries Shall correspond to lot lines shown on the approved tentative map. L SC - 2/9~ t2or~2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE:July 22, lg92STAFF REPORT TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Conmnisston FROM: Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer BY: Betty A. Mill er, Associate Engineer SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 13845 - MASI COMM~CE CENI~R' PARI'NER5 - A subdlvls'lon of"'j(J.Z acres of land int6 31"pa~cels"(fi th~ Industrial Park district (Subarea 7) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan located at the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue - APN: 229-011-10, 19, 21, 26, 27, and 28. Staff recommends issuance of a mitigated Negative Declaration. Related files: Conditional Use Permit 91-24. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of the proposed Tentative Parcel Map as shown on E'xhibit' "lB" B. Parcel Size: Parcel No. Acres Parcel No. Acres 1 0.50 17 0.56 2 0.84 18 0.40 3 0.55 19 0.40 4 0.50 20 0.39 5 0.68 21 0.42 6 0.71 22 0.63 7 0.80 23 1.77 8 0.51 24 1.81 9 0.46 25 0.47 10 0.45 26 0.47 11 0.46 27 1.46 12 0.46 28 1.28 13 0.43 2g 1.56 14 0.48 30 0.68 15 0.77 31 .1.67 16 1.13 Total 23.70 C.E. xist. i. nl) Zoning: Industrial Park y ITEM H PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT PM 13845 - MASI COMMERCE CENTER PARTNERS JULY 22, 1992 PAGE 2 D. Surroundinl) Land Use: North - Vacant South - Sports Complex, under construction East - Vacant and single family residences West - Vacant E. Surrounding General Plan and Development Code Designations: North - Mixed Uses: Conmnercial/Office/Residential, Terra Visa Community P1 an South - General Industrial, Industrial Area Specific Plan, Subarea 8 East - Industrial Park, Industrial Area Specific Plan, Subarea 7 West - Industrial Park, Industrail Area Specific Plan, Subarea 7 F. Site Characteri sti cs: The site i s mostly vacant, wtth 2 exi sting structures near 'the Rochester/Foothill intersection, and slopes to the south at between 2 and 3 percent. Foothill Boulevard is 4-lane arterial along the north property line, Rochester Avenue has 2 lanes along the east property line, and the Sports Complex perimeter wall follows the south property line. The City has recently installed a traffic signal and aligned the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue. ANALYSIS: The purpose of this parcel map is to create 31 separate 1 ots for the ~tng complex proposed as Conditional Use Permit 91-24 (Exhibit "C") . Foothill Boulevard will be widened on the south side and, if Caltrans permits, the median island will be installed. Rochester Avenue will be widened on the west side and interior streets "A" and "B" constructed. An existing Sports Complex storm drain will be extended up Street "B" to Foothill Boulevard. The applicant has asked to phase the install atton of public improvements consistent with the development phasing plan for CUP 91-24. Staff recommends that all perimeter and interior streets and public storm drainage facilities be completed with the first development phase. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The applicant completed Part I of the Initial Study. Staff conducted a field investigation and completed Part II of the Initial Study. Although the project could have an impact on the environment in several areas there will not be a significant adverse effect because of the mitigation measures included with the conditions of approval. Therefore, issuance of Mitigated Negative Declaration is appropriate. CORRESPONDENCE: Notices of Public Hearing have been sent to surrounding property owners and placed in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin. Posting at the site has al so been completed. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT PM 13845 - MASI COMMERCE CENTER PARTNERS JULY 22, 1992 PAGE 3 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission consider all input ~nE!' '~lements of the Tentative Parcel Map 13845. If after such consideration, the Commission can recommend approval, then the adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance of a mitigated Negative Declaration would be appropri ate. Respectful ly submitted, Dan Ja~m~s~~ Senior Civil Engineer DJ:BAM:jh Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Vicinity Map Exhibit "B" - Tentative Map Exhibit "C" - Site Plan (CUP 91-24) Resolution and Recommended Conditions of Approval RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NUMBER 13845, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND ROCHESTER AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 229-011-10, 19, 21, 26, 27, and 28 WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 13845, submitted by Masi Commerce Center Partners, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing into 31 parcels, the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, identified as APN(s) 229-011-10, 19, 21, 26, 27, and 28, located at the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue; and WHEREAS, on July 22, 1992, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing for the above-described map. NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the following findings have been made: 1. That the map is consistent with the General Plan. 2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan. 3.That the site is physically suitable for the proposed development. 4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage or public health problems or have adverse effects on abutting propert ies. SECTION 2: This Commission finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970; and further, this Commission hereby issues a mitigated Negative Declaration, SECTION 3 .' Tentative Parcel Map Number 13845 is hereby approved subject to the attached Standard Conditions and the following Special Conditions: Enqineerinq Division 1. The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications) on the project side of Rochester Avenue shall be undergrounded from the first pole off-site south of the project's south boundary to and including the end-of-line pole just south of Foothill Boulevard, prior to public improvement PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TENT PM 13845 - MASI COERCE CENTER PARTNERS July 22, 1992 Page 2 acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. The service to the existing structure on the east side of Rochester Avenue shall be undergrounded across Rochester Avenue to the pole on the east side of the street. Services to the existing structures on-site from the east side of Rochester Avenue shall be undergrounded as well. In addition, an in- lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the utilities on the opposite side of Rochester Avenue shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of building permits. The fee shall be one-half the difference between the undergrounding cost of the utilities (electrical, except for 66 KV electrical) on the opposite side of the street minus those (telecommunications) on the project side times the length from the center of Foothill Boulevard to the south project boundary (990± feet). 2. Foothill Boulevard shall be constructed as follows, subject to modification by and approval of Caltrans, with Phase I: a. Full improvements on the south side from Rochester Avenue to the west project boundary including a continuous right turn lane beginning 230 feet west of the Foothill driveway. b. A landscaped median between Rochester Avenue and "B" Street with left turn lanes to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. If Caltrans does not allow a single segment, in-lieu fees will be required in conformance with Condition 3. c. Thirty-two feet of pavement on the north side of the median. d. A catch basin at the ultimate low point on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, sized per the final drainage study, with an interim lateral to the catch basin on the south side. The north right-of-way shall be graded to direct flows to the catch basin with desilting facilities to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. e. Transitions to existing pavement west of the west project boundary to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and Caltrans. f. The Developer may request a reimbursement agreement for permanent improvements north of the centerline, including half of the landscaped median costs, from future development as it occurs on the north side of the street. 3. An in-lieu fee as contribution to the future construction of the median island within Foothill Boulevard shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of building permits for Phase I or approval of the Final Parcel Map, whichever occurs first. The amount of the fee shall be one half the cost of the median times the length from the west project boundary to a projection of the westerly right-of-way line for "B" Street. If Caltrans does not allow construction of the median in Condition 2b, the fee limits shall extend to a projection of the westerly right-of-way line for Rochester Avenue. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TENT PM 13845 - MASI COERCE CENTER PARTNERS July 22, 1992 Page 3 4. Rochester Avenue shall be constructed per approved Drawing No. 1431 with Phase I, unless completed by others. In addition, sidewalks, street trees, and a combined bus bay/right turn lane north of the project driveway shall be installed. The right turn lane shall begin as close to the Foothill Boulevard intersection as possible. 5. All public storm drains and interior public street improvements shall be constructed with Phase I. 6. Public street Bump conditions shall be designed as follows: a. Provide an overflow route from "A" Street to the south project boundary and a method for those flows to pass through the perimeter wall in the event of blockage in the catch basins (method shown on the conceptual grading plan has not been reviewed. b. Provide an overflow route from Foothill Boulevard to either "B" Street or Rochester Avenue in the event of blockage in the Foothill catch basin and provide additional catch basin capacity on Foothill Boulevard to minimize the possibility of blockage to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. c. Provide surface drainage easements and drainage acceptance agreements allowing public water to enter private property from both "A" Street and Foothill Boulevard. 7. The public storm drain in Foothill Boulevard and "B" Street shall be upsized to accommodate interim undeveloped flows from the north side of Foothill Boulevard, per the final drainage study, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The minimum diameter for permanent public storm drain mains is 24 inches. 8. Construct the earthen berm north of Foothill Boulevard, as designed for the Sports Complex, with Phase I, unless completed by others. 9. An in-lieu fee as contribution to the future installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and "B" Street shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of building permits for Phase I or approval of the Final Parcel Map, whichever occurs first. The amount of the fee shall be one- half the cost of the signal. 10. Parkway improvements along Foothill Boulevard shall conform to the Foothill Specific Plan Design Supplement, to the satisfaction of the City Planner and City Engineer. 11. An in-lieu fee for one-fourth the cost of constructing special pavers within the Foothill Boulevard/Rochester Avenue intersection shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of building permits for Phase I. The fee amount shall be based on the square footage of the intersection. 12. Modify the traffic signal at the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue as needed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO- TENT PM 13845 - MASI COMMERCE CENTER PARTNERS July 22, 1992 Page 4 13. A public sidewalk easement shall be provided, with an encroachment/maintenance agreement for the plaques, overhead arcade, and other features, south of the Foothill Boulevard right-of-way between Rochester Avenue and the project driveway. The agreement shall hold the City harmless for damage to or liability from privately maintained special features. The agreement shall be recorded prior to or concurrent with the Final Parcel Map. 14. All drive approaches shall conform to City Standards. Larger radii (up to 20 feet maximum) may be used when transitioning from a 40-foot width at the right-of-way to lesser aisle widths on-site, as shown on the approved plans, for "B" Street driveways in particular. 15. "No parking/Stopping" shall be posted on all public street frontages. 16. No portion of the "Vintners Walk," including the seat wall, shall encroach on the Foothill Boulevard right-of-way- 17. Provide hardscape to the curb in the bus boarding area along Rochester Avenue. 18. Sidewalk shall cross drive approaches at the zero curb face. Handicap ramps are only required at street intersections- Cross walks shall conform to City Standards. 19. The areas tributary to Rochester Avenue and the Sports Complex storm drain system shall be adjusted as necessary in the Final Drainage Study so that flows will not exceed the capacity of the existing downstream system. 20. The section of "B" Street between Foothill Boulevard and the four-way driveway intersection 200 feet south of Foothill Boulevard shall be 56 feet curb-to-curb, to accommodate four traffic lanes. Provide a 40 MPH transition for the outer lanes south of the 4-way driveway intersection- Buildinq and Safety Division 1. Provide a 60-foot non-buildable easement on the west side of the existing building to remain on Parcel 27. 2. All proposed structures must comply with the wall and opening protection requirements of UBC Chapter 5 with respect to new property lines. 3. On-site storm drains shall be designed for QIO0. Planninq Division 1. Tentative Parcel Map 13845 is contingent upon approval of Conditional Use Permit 91-24, as lots of less than 2 acres along Foothill Boulevard are only allowed within an approved master plan. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TENT PM 13845 - MASI COERCE CENTER PARTNERS July 22, 1992 Page 5 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF JULY 1992. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22nd day of July 1992, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Regions splitcit planners' impsessions of' on regional regional government. government By Candysse Miller / V/Z:~/~ North Central South Plarmers on the front lines of Favorable:: 6~a 55% 45% Cahfornia's BTowth bgtt]es may or may not see regional government 38%~ 45% 55% as a solution to the state's eco- nomic, environmental and plan- ning problems - depending on what region they're from. ' A new UC Irvine study shows that while Northern California city planners believe regional ov- ersight may ease the problems caused by rapid growth, Southern ' ' -. California planners see regional- ism as a threat to suburban autonomy. ' ~: ' "Northern California' sees its~ff ": .... ' ' as a separate region of the state and has a number of successful regional agencies such as the Bay Area Rapid Transit System," said Mark Baldassare, director of the university's urban and regional planning graduate program who headed the project. "However, · '- ' Southern California suburbs sur- rounding Los Angeles traditionally :?~'~:~"' ~',', ~" have tried to keep their distance from the large city that dominates :' ~ ~ ......, their region. . :..,, :. "Regional government raises fears about their cities being See SURVEY/A6 Smlas/Oally BullsUn Survey/from A1 o~er~zhe]med by the 9i~-e and Catifontia'8 plezLrdng dizector8 .the prob]ema of ~oe Angeles." have mixed feellnge abou~ · he threat of LoB Angels8 ~iona] governmice, bat moat dommatLq~ the teSion'8 potitical have doubta about its ~eepon- voio; is nothing new to the siveness to citizens and its Southern California Association frugality. of C~vernments, which strug- But even their mixed verdict gled with the issue earlier this should give legislators hints year when it expanded its about growth management ef- vo~g board to include regional forts. : representation. "For regional government to In creating voting districts, take a larger role in state SCAG officials had to persuade growth management, it will suburban cities that expanding havs to have stronger support the board from 25 to nearly 70 at the local level," Baldassare members would amplify their said. "And, since attitudes to- voice, not dilute it. It wasn't an ward regional government vary eas:~ sell. by region . . . efforts on growth "'Faat'~ no surprise," said management should allow re- Chino C}mmunity Development gions to find governmental ar- : Director Earl Nelson. "The rangemerits that are suited to whole i.~sue is of home rule, their current needs and local and people are reluctant to give preferences." UP the authority they already Many favor the idea of a have - especially when it comes regional government with re-- to land use decisions." sponsibilities including air pol- .- t;ut {ven Los Angeles sub- lution control, regulating toxics urbs he. vea need for some and public transit, but few regional oversight- perhaps at want it to go beyond county " the comity level - to protect boundaries. : them from the inevitable com- Among the findings of the ' petition spurred by a bad econ- survey, conducted between Sep- omy, he said. tember and December of last Countywide solutions may year: not address the most prominent - Most planners - 48 percent regional issue in Chino, where - said they prefer regional cities on both sides of the Los agencies to serve multiple func- Angeles-San Bemardino County tions, such as combining land line want to snare a regional use, air quality and transporta- mall - and its lucrative sales tion planning under one roof, tax dollars. Rather than cooper- while 28 percent would rather ating, cash-strapped cities are see the state provide financial competing, he said. incentives for local governments "We're kind of put in a to cooperate with state guide- position to fight each other," lines and 11 percent say that Nelson said. "Like every other regionalism belongs only in sin- city, we're just trying to further gle-purpose agencies such as ~ our own community ... be- the South Coast Air Quality cause there's just no money." Management District. Roughly The study, conducted by the 12 percent flatly oppose region- University of Calffornia's Call- al government. fornia Policy Seminar at the -While planners cited near- request of the state Legislature, unanimous support for regional surveyed planning directors regulatory controls, such as for throughout the state from cities air pollution and toxics, 57 with 4,000 or more population. percent oppose regional over- In all, 225 planning directors sight in planning residential, responded to the mailing. commercial and industrial de- Baldassare concluded that velopment. Single Etiwanda foothills nature preserve discussed By Lee P®ter~on agency i9 exploring the poaeibili~ of Daily Bulletin purchasing land in the foothills north of the transmission lines for a natural RANCHO CUCAMONGA -- Conser- habitat preserve. vation plans for the E~iwanda footbfih That however would make up o~ly a are far from concrete, but an idea to small part of the. land north of the set aside one chunk rather- than power lines, which is about one:~.hird several small plots as a permanent of the 7,000 acres of nnincorpQrated preserve is under discussion. north Etiwanda. Environmentalists and wildlife biolo- In the past, house-building plans for gists support the proposal to make off- north Etiwanda have proposed to save limits to development everything north s great deal of the area for open :space, of the northernmost power lines.. but these ideas have relied on smaller They say that's the best way to portions of undeveloped territm~y con- guarantee survival of bird, insect and nected by wild!ire corridors. plant species that inhabit the slopes. But finding the funding to pay for a Caltrans would consider participat- solid block of preserve next 'to the ing in a small part of such a refuge, mountnlna could be difficult in ,.an era according to Steven Keel, environmen- of greatly reduced home buiJtling. tal manager for the local Caltrnn. San Bernardino County foothills district. manager Tim Johnson said the.. power That's because the agency would lines seem to be an appropriate have to make up for building on or demarcation for a different kind of impacting about 300 acres of alluvial treatment. sage scrub to build. the Route 30 The plan to save everything north ol' Freeway through Rancho Cucamonga. the power lines is not a pie in the sky Keel said it's only tentative, but his See PRESERVEfB7 PrE}Sgl'V9/from B1 idea, Johnson said, but there wildlife biologist for the U.S. isn't any money to pay for it. Fish and Wildlife Service. Some of the land is held by "ff you are trying to save a developers who have plans for small plot, forget it. You need a home building and have al- large contingous piece" said ready started the process to- Barbara Carlson, director of the ward obtaining permission to University of Calffornia's Motte build from the county. Rimrock Reserve near Penis. Carlson has studied the north Wildlife biologists support Etiwanda sage scrub area. the idea of saving one large chunk. Carlson said the birds that inhabit the sage scrub area "~v'hat we'd like to do is would not survive for long on protect this as a functioning isolated "islands" of natural system," said John Hanlon, habitat.