HomeMy WebLinkAbout2001/02/07 - Agenda Packet C' TY OF
RANCH,OL ,UCAMONGA
10500 Civic 6e terrBnve n
Rancho Cacamonga; CA 91730
City Office: (909) 477-2700
AGENDAS
:7 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
- CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETINGS:
tST and 3rd Wednesdays, 7:00 p.m.
February 7, 2001
A.clencV, Board & City Council Members
William J. Alexander ....................Mayor
Diane Willjams ...............Mayor Pro Tem
Paul Biane ...............................Member
James V. Curatalo .....................Member
Bob Dutton ..............................Member
Jack Lam .........................City Manager
James L. Markman .............City Attorney
Debra J. Adams .....................City Clerk
ORDER OF BUSINESS
5:30 p.m. Closed Session .................................. Tapia Conference Room
7:00 p.m. Regular Redevelopment Agency Meeting ...... Council Chambers
Regular City Council iVieeting ......................Council Chambers
City Council Agenda
February 7, 2001
All items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in writing.
The deadline for submittin'g these items is 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, one
week prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's Office receives all such
items.
A. CALL TO ORDER
1. Roll Call: Alexander Biane
Curatalo Dutton , and 'Willlares__
B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS
1. Presentation of a Proclamation commending the City's First All-Star
Roller Hockey Competition Participants.
C.~. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
This is the time and place for the general public to address the City
Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any
issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may
receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting.
Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual.
D. CONSENT CALENDAR
The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and
non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time
without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Councilmember
or member of the audience for discussion.
1, Approval of Minutes: December 6, 2000
December 20, 2000
January 3, 2001 (Curatalo absent)
January 17, 2001 (Dutton absent)
2. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 1/10/01, 1/17/01, 1/24/01 and 1
1/25/01 and Payroll ending 1/4/01, 1/8/01 and 1/31/01 for the total
amount of $4,793,173.75.
3. Approval of Alcoholic Beverage Application for Off-Sale Beer and Wine 29
for 7-Day Market (person-to-person transfer, existing business),
Tharwat Sami Elmassry, Global Management & Development, 12854
Foothill Boulevard.
4. Approval of the selection of AMS Planning and Research Corporation to 31
conduct a Performing Arts Center Feasibility Study funded by Forest
City Development.
5. Approval of a Request for Waiver of Rental Fees for Use of the 43
Epicenter Stadium from the Quakes Community Foundation for a Youth
Baseball Camp on July 18-20, 2001
City Council Agenda
February 7, 2001
6. Approval to appropriate $280,000 in Account No. 1001-305-5300 and 45
$100,000 in Account No. 1001-305-5303 to supplement funding of
Contract Services for Engineering Plan Checking.
7. Approval of a Resolution of the City Council continuing a 47
Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Program for the City of
Rancho Cucamonga.
RESOLUTION NO. 01-017 49
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, CONTINUING A
DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE
(DBE) PROGRAM FOR THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
8. Approval of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security for 6th 50
located at the southwest corner of r ,
submitted by Cabot Industrial Properties, L.P.
RESOLUTION NO. 01-018 52
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT
SECURITY FOR CONSTRUCTION OF
TRAFFIC SIGNAL FOR DR 99-46
9. Approval of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and 53
Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and
Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for DR 00-08, located
on the. northwest corner of 4th Street and Santa Anita Avenue,
submitted by Vic Chen, a developer.
RESOLUTION NO. 01-019 56
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT
SECURITY FOR DR 00-08
RESOLUTION NO, 01-020 57
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION
OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO, 3B AND
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR DR 00-08
City Council Agenda
February 7, 2001
10. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities, 60
Monumentation Cash'Deposit and Ordering the Annexation to
Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance
District Nos. 1 and 2 for Tract Map 16026, located on the west side of
Amethyst Street, north of Valley View Street, submitted by Amethyst
Estates, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company.
RESOLUTION NO. 01-021 63
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES,
MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT AND
TRACT MAP NO. 16026
RESOLUTION NO. 01-022 64
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION
OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR TRACT MAP 16026
11. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security, 72
Monumentation Cash Deposit and Ordering the Annexation to
Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 and Street Lighting Maintenance
District Nos. 1 and 3 for Tract Map No. 16081, located at the southwest
corner of Victoria Park Lane and Day Creek Boulevard.
RESOLUTION NO. 01-023 75
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT
SECURITY AND MONUMENTATION CASH
DEPOSIT FOR TRACT MAP NUMBER 16081
RESOLUTION NO. 01-024 76
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION
OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 AND
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NOS. 1 AND 3 FOR TRACT MAP NUMBER
16081
~ [ City Council Agenda
February 7, 2001 4
12. Approval to accept the Bids received and award and authorize the 83
execution of the Contract in the amount of $110,290.54 ($100,264.12
plus 10% contingency) to the apparent low bidder, Premier Contractors
(CO 01-008) for the construction of the Carnelian Street Pavement
Rehabilitation from Vineyard Avenue to 1550 feet north, to be funded
from Measure I Funds, Account No. 1-176-303-5650/1043-176.
13. Approval to award the Contract for the printing of The Grapevine to 87
Holiday Printing (CO 01-009) in the amount of $77,517.00 for four
issues.
14. Approval of a Contract between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the 91
San Bernardino County Superintendent of Schools Office (CO 01-010)
and appropriate funds in the amount of $30,000 for the Teen
Connection Program (Fund 264).
15. Approval to release remaining bonds on Parcel Map 14022, Tract 99
13351, Tract 13303 and Tract 13303-2.
16. Approval to release Labor and Material Bond, Letter of Credit No. '102
SB995039, and accept as Labor and Material Bond, Letter of Credit No.
RP210005 for Improvements for Tract 13812, submitted by Wealth V.
LLC, located west of Etiwanda Avenue, between Summit and Highland.
17. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance 105
Bond, accept a Maintenance Bond, and file a Notice of Completion for
Improvements for Tract 14380, submitted by General Electric Capital
Corporation, a New York Corporation, located on the northwest comer
of Etiwanda and Wilson Avenues.
RESOLUTION NO. 01-025 I 08
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 14380 AND
AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
18. Approval to accept the Banyan Street at Fredericksburg Avenue Traffic 109
Signal and Widening Improvements, Contract No. 00-051, as complete,
release the bonds, and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of
Completion and approve the final contract amount of $168, 790.66.
RESOLUTION NO. 01-026 '110
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE BANYAN
STREET AT FREDERICKSBURG AVENUE
TRAFFIC SIGNAL AND WIDENING
IMPROVEMENTS, CONTRACT NO. 00-051,
AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A
NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
I~ I City Council Agenda
February 7, 2001 5
E. CONSENT ORDINANCES
The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time of first
reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and non-
controversial. The Council will act them upon at one time without
discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be
removed for discussion.
No Items Submitted.
F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS
The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public
hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to
receive public testimony.
1. CONSIDERATION OF APPEAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 112
AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 99-50 - VANTIGER - An appeal of
the Planning Commission's decision to require the construction of storm
drainage improvements on Foothill Boulevard from the existing terminus
near Cornwall Avenue to Etiwanda Avenue for the development of a
service station with convenience market, drive-thru fast food service
and a drive-thru self-service car wash on two acres of land located on
the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue in the
Community Commercial District (Subarea 4) of the Foothill Boulevard
SpecificPlan-APN: 1100-161-002.
2. FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 99-02 - 127
SACRED HEART CHURCH - A request to amend the Foothill
Boulevard Specific Plan to allow churches subject to a Conditional Use
Permit within the Regional Commercial land use designation (Subarea
4) and to increase the allowable building height for churches. Relation
file: Conditional Use Permit 99-56, Tree Removal Permit 00-45, and
Preliminary Application Review 98-12.
ORDINANCE NO. 652 (first reading) 196
A ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING FOOTHILL
BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT
99-02, AMENDING THE DEVELOPMENT
CODE, CHAPTER 17.32 FOOTHILL
BOULEVARD DISTRICTS, TO ALLOW
CHURCHES SUBJECT TO A CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT WITHIN THE REGIONAL
COMMERCIAL LAND USE DESIGNATION
(SUBAREA 4) AND TO INCREASE THE
ALLOWABLE BUILDING HEIGHT FOR
CHURCHES, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN
SUPPORT THEREOF
City Council Agenda
February 7, 2001
G.,~. PUBLIC HEARINGS
The following items have no legal publication or posting
requirements. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public
testimony.
1. CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE TO ESTABLISH A PRIMA 204
FACIE SPEED LIMIT OF 45 MPH ON CHURCH STREET BETWEEN
MILLIKEN AVENUE AND ROCHESTER AVENUE
ORDINANCE NO. 653 (first reading) 204-1
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 10.20.020
OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL
CODE TO ESTABLISH A PRIMA FACIE
SPEED LIMIT OF 45 MPH ON CHURCH
STREET BETWEEN MILLIKEN AVENUE AND
ROCHESTER AVENUE
H...~ CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS
The following items do not legally require any public testimony,
although the Chair may open the meeting for public input.
208
1. REPORT ON ORDINANCE 58
2. REPORT ON STOP SIGNS ON SAPPHIRE AT LEMON AVENUE AND 210
HIGHLAND AVENUE
I_. COUNCIL BUSINESS
The following items have been requested by the City Council for
discussion. They are not public hearing items, although the Chair
may open the meeting for public input.
No Items Submitted.
J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
This is the time for City Council to identify the items they wish to
discuss at the next meeting. These items will not be discussed at this
meeting, only identified for the next meeting.
City Council Agenda
February 7, 2001
7
K.~. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
This is the time and place for the general public to address the City
Council. State law prohibits the city Council from addressing any
issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Council may
receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting.
Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual.
L. ADJOURNMENT
I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my
designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing
agenda was posted on February 1, 2001, seventy two (72) hours prior
to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center
Drive.
December 5, 2000
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION MINUTES
A. CALL TO ORDER
The Rancho Cucamonga City Council held a closed session on Wednesday, December 6, 2000, in
the Tapia Room of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga,
California. The meeting was called to order at 5:35 p.m. by Mayor William J. Alexander.
Present were Councilmembers: Paul Biane, James Curatalo, Bob Dutton, Diane Williams and Mayor
William J. Alexander.
Also present were: Jack Lain, City Manager; Pamela Easter, Deputy City Manager; James
Markman, City Attorney; and Linda D. Daniels, Redevelopment Agency Director.
B. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEMS
Mayor Alexander announced the items to be discussed in closed session.
1. MEET AND CONFER PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957.6, JACK LAM, CITY
MANAGER, AND JIM MARKMAN, CITY ATTORNEY, NEGOTIATING PARTIES. - CC
Approved 5-0 amendment to CO 89-037.
2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION - INITIATION OF
LITIGATION PURSUANT TO SUBDIVISION (c) OF SECTION 54956.9 - ONE CASE. - CC
No action taken.
3. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL REGARDING PENDING LITIGATION, CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA VS. VANGUARD PLASTICS, INC., PER GOVERNMENT CODE
SECTION 54956.9. - CC
No action taken.
C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC ON CLOSED SESSION ITEMS ONLY
No one was present to comment on the closed session item.
D. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION
Closed session began at 5:40 p.m.
City Council Minutes
December 6, 2000
Page 2
E. RECESS
THE CLOSED SESSION ADJOURNED AT 6:45 P.M.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Re.qular Meetinq
A. CALL TO ORDER
A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, December 6,
2000 in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho
Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor Alexander.
Present were Councilmembers: Paul Biane, James Curatalo, Bob Dutton, Diane Williams, and
Mayor William J. Alexander.
Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; Pamela Easter, Deputy City Manager; James
'Markman, City Attorney; James C. Frost, City Treasurer; Charles Scott, St. Information Systems
Analyst; Sam Davis, Information Systems Specialist; Brad Buller, City Planner; Kitt Coury, Associate
Planner; Joe O'Neil, City Engineer; Bill Makshanoff, Building Official; Kevin McArdle, Community
Services Director; Paula Pachon, Management Analyst I1~; Dave Moore, Recreation Superintendent;
Deborah Clark, Library Director; Lt. David Lau, Police Department; Chief Dennis Michael, Rancho
Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager; Diane O'Neal,
Assistant to the City Manager; Jenny Haruyama, Management Analyst I; and Debra J. Adams, City
Clerk.
B. NOVEMBER 7~ 2000 ELECTION MATTERS
B1. APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION CERTIFYING MUNICIPAL ELECTION RESULTS
RESOLUTION NO. 00-243
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA RECITING THE FACT OF THE GENERAL
MUNICIPAL ELECTION HELD IN SAID CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA ON THE 7TM DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2000, DECLARING
THE RESULT THEREOF AND SUCH OTHER MATTERS AS ARE
PROVIDED BY LAW
MOTION: Moved by Dutton, seconded by Biane to approve Resolution No. 00-243. Motion carried
unanimously 5-0
Item C1, C2, C3 and C4 were the next items of business considered. The minutes will remain in
agenda order.
2. ADMINISTRATION OF OATHS OF OFFICE - Oaths of Office will be administered by Superior Court
Judge, Jeffrey King. Oaths to be administered to:
City Council Minutes
December 6, 2000
Page 3
Paul Biane, Councilmember
Bob Dutton, Councilmember
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk
James C. Frost, City Treasurer
Judge Jeffrey King was introduced.
Judge King asked for Paul Biane, Bob Dutton, Debra Adams and James Frost to come forward. He
administered the oaths of office and presented Certificates of Election to Councilmembers Biane and
Dutton, City Clerk Adams and City Treasurer James Frost.
A recess was taken at 7:18 p.m. to allow an opportunity for congratulations to be extended to the elected
officials. Mayor Alexander called the meeting back to order at 7:37 p.m. with all Councilmembers
present.
C. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS
C1. Presentation of the AIta Loma Honor Roll Dedication Flag.
Sam Spagnolo of the Fire District presented the flag to the City Council A picture of the honor guard
was presented to Chief Michael.
C2. Presentation of a Proclamation declaring November 8, 2000 the 51st Anniversary of "World Town
Planning Day."
Not presented.
C3. Presentation of GFOA's Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial reporting for the
Fiscal Year ended June 30, 1999.
Not presented.
C4. Presentation of a Proclamation commending the RC Pop Warner Eagles on its Mount Baldy
Conference Championship Victory.
The coaches and team members were introduced. Mayor Alexander presented a proclamation to them.
D, COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
D1. Jim Frost thanked the City for its support of the Chaffey Garcia House. He also commented that
Judge Jeffrey King was a former Mayor of the City.
D2. Joyce Lewis Ashworth talked about the old stone church in Rancho Cucamonga located on
Church Street and told about how it was built. She talked about the history of the church. Ms.
Ashworth commented that it was a requirement in 1994 to retrofit the church and that funds were
donated to restore it She reported that now, six years later, they are still in need of financial help to
reopen the doors of the church. She asked the community to help reopen the doors of the church
through their contributions.
City Council Minutes
December 6, 2000
Page 4
E. CONSENT CALENDAR
El. Approval of Minutes: November 1. 2000
November 15, 2000
E2. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 11/8/00, 11/15/00, 11/16/00 and 11/22/00 and Payroll
ending 11/8/00 and 11/22/00 for the total amount of $3,174,935.49.
E3. Approval of Alcoholic Beverage Application for Off-Sale General for Thomas Winery Liquor
(transfer of license), Richard Fernando Barba and Angel Nicole Young, 8045 Vineyard Ave., I-8.
E4. Approval of Alcoholic Beverage Application for On-Sale General for Good Fellas Fine Cigars
(transfer of license), Robert Allan Lang, 8034 Haven Ave., Suite B.
E5. Approval to appropriate $84,172.00, awarded by The United States Department of Justice Local
Law Enforcement Block Grants Program.
E6. Approval of a Resolution approving Records Retention Schedules for Personnel, Business
Licensing, Admin. Services/Admin., Admin Services/Treasury, GIS/Special Districts and Facilities
Maintenance/Yard.
RESOLUTION NO. 00-244
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING RECORDS RETENTION
SCHEDULES FOR VARIOUS CITY DEPARTMENTS AND DIVISIONS
ET. Approval of a request to make a determination of Public Convenience and Necessity 00-04 -
Tarlos & Associates, for the issuance of a Type 47 Alcoholic Beverage License, for on-site
consumption of alcoholic beverages at a proposed 7,300 square foot restaurant, "On the Border,"
which will be located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard within the Terra Vista Town Center, in the
Community commercial (CC) District of the Terra Vista Community Plan - APN: 1077-421-82 and 83.
Related file: Conditional Use Permit 00-39 and Development Review 00-46.
RESOLUTION NO. 00-245
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A DETERMINATION OF
THE PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY AND A REQUEST FOR
THE ISSUANCE OF AN ALCOHOL BEVERAGE LICENSE WITHIN A
FULL SERVICE RESTAURANT, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF
FOOTHILL BOULEVARD WiTHIN THE TERRA VISTA TOWN CENTER
AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. APN: 1077-421-82
AND 83
E8. Approval of City Web Site Policy.
E9. Approval to file for reimbursement in Local Transportation Fund, Article 3 Grant Funds
administered by SANBAG for the construction of pedestrian facilities.
El0. Approval of applications for Grant Funds from the Transportation Enhancement Activities
Program and the Environmental Enhancement and Mitigation Program for the Metrolink Station
Beautification Project.
City Council Minutes
December 6, 2000
Page 5
RESOLUTION NO. 00-246
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR
GRANT FUNDS FOR THE ENVIRONMENTAL ENHANCEMENT AND
MITIGATION PROGRAM UNDER THE SECTION 164.56 OF THE
STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE FOR THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA
METROLINK STATION BEAUTIFICATION PROJECT
RESOLUTION NO. 00-247
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR
FUNDING FROM THE TRANSPORTATION ENHANCEMENT (TEA)
PROGRAM OF THE TRANSPORTATION ACT FOR THE 21sT CENTURY
(TEA 21) FOR THE METROLINK STATION BEAUTIFICATION PROJECT
E11. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the construction of
Carnelian Street Pavement Rehabilitation from Vineyard Avenue to 1550 feet north to be funded from
Account No. 32-4637-9314 (1 176 303 5650/1043 176 0).
RESOLUTION NO. 00-248
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF CARNELIAN
STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM VINEYARD AVENUE TO
1550 FEET NORTH IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND
DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS
E12. Approval of a Resolution authorizing the project to improve Haven Avenue from Base Line Road
to Rte, 210 including widening the west side to provide three travel lanes and the installation of related
storm drain facilities.
RESOLUTION NO. 00-249
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE PROJECT TO
IMPROVE HAVEN AVENUE FROM BASE LINE ROAD TO RTE. 210
INCLUDING WIDENING THE WEST SIDE TO PROVIDE THREE
TRAVEL LANES AND THE INSTALLATION OF RELATED STORM
DRAIN FACILITIES
E13. Approval to accept all bids received and authorize the award and execution of the contract (CO
00-090) to the lowest responsible bidder. OPTI-GRO, of Highland, Ca., in the amount of $50,325
($425,750 plus 10% contingency) for the In~eld Renovation of the three softball fields at the Rancho
Cucamonga Adult Sports Complex, to be funded from Fund 1-133-303-5650-1222 (46-4130-9929).
E14. Approval to accept bids received and award and authorize the execution of the contract (CO 00-
091) in the amount of $306,925.85 ($279,023.50 plus 10% contingency) to the apparent low bidder,
Gentry Brothers, Inc., for the construction of the Monte Vista Street Improvements, to be funded from
CDBG funds, Account No. 28-4333-9963 (old), 1-204-314-5650-1255-204 (new). REMOVED BY
COUNCILMEMBER WILLIAMS FOR DISCUSSION.
City Council Minutes
December 6, 2000
Page 6
E15. Approval of Drainage Reimbursement Agreement (CO 00-092) and appropriation of $46,000.00
from Fund 23 (Drainage Facilities/General City) fund balance for installation of a portion of master
planned storm drain facilities in connection with development of Tract No. 13759, located on the west
side of Haven Avenue north of the Railroad right-of-way (formerly Southern Pacific Transportation
Company), submitted by Forecast Group, L.P. (DRA-32).
RESOLUTION NO. 00-250
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DRAINAGE
REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT (DRA~32) FOR THE INSTALLATION
OF A PORTION OF MASTER PLANNED STORM DRAIN FACILITIES,
LINES 4-1 AND 4-L, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF HAVEN
AVENUE NORTH OF THE RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY (FORMERLY
SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION COMPANY)
E16. Approval of a Professional Services Agreement (CO 00-093) with Dan Guerra & Associates, to
provide construction survey services for the proposed Monte Vista Street Improvements, in the
amount of $15,950 ($14,500.00 plus 10% contingency), to be funded from Community Development
Block Grant Funds, Account No. 28-4333-9963 (old) or 1-204-314-5650/1255-204 (new). ITEM
REMOVED FOR DISCUSSION BY COUNCILMEMBER WILLIAMS.
E17. Approval and execution of Program Supplement Agreement No. 022 (CO 00-094) to State-Local
Partnership Program Agreement No. SLTPP-5420, between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the
State of California to provide project funding for construction of Day Creek Boulevard from Base Line
Road to Highland Avenue.
RESOLUTION NO. 00-251
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND
SIGNING OF PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT NO. 022 TO STATE-LOCAL
TRANSPORTATION PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM AGREEMENT NO.
SLTPP-5420, BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND
THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA TO PROVIDE FUNDING FOR
CONSTRUCTION AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING OF DAY
CREEK BOULEVARD FROM BASE LINE ROAD TO HIGHLAND
AVENUE
E18. Approval and execution of a Cooperative Agreement (CO-00-095) between the State of
California (State), the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (Authority), and the City of
Rancho Cucamonga (City) for the construction of Segment 4 of State Route 210 (30) in the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, California.
RESOLUTION NO. 00-252
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE EXECUTION OF A
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
(STATE), THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION
AUTHORITY (AUTHORITY), AND THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA (CITY) FOR CONSTRUCTION OF SEGMENT 4 OF
STATE ROUTE 210 (30) IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA
City Council Minutes
December 6, 2000
Page ?
E19. Approval of Plans and Specifications, accept the bids received and award and authorize the
execution of the Contract (CO 00-096) in the amount of $1,766,568,93 ($1,605,971.75 plus 10%
contingency) to the apparent low bidder, Riverside Construction Company, for the construction of the
Metrolink Station Expansion, Phase II, to be funded from Regional Choice Transit Capital
Improvement Funds, Account No. 1230-303-5650/1225-230.
E20. Accept the ADA 19gg,2000and drive approach improvement at various ,coations
along Hermosa Avenue, Havent Street and Arrow Route, Contract No. 00-016 as
complete, release the bonds and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and
approve the final contract amount of $122,566.44.
RESOLUTION NO. 00-253
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS ADA 1999/2000 ACCESS RAMP AND DRIVE
APPROACH IMPROVEMENTS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS ALONG
HERMOSA AVENUE, HAVEN AVENUE, 6TM STREET AND ARROW
ROUTE, CONTRACT NO. 00-016 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF
A NOTICE OF COMPLETION
-.E21. Approval of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security, ordering the Annexation to
Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for DR
99-55 located on the southeast corner of Milliken Avenue and Arrow Route, submitted by Rancho
Cucamonga II, Inc., a Massachusetts Corporation.
RESOLUTION NO. 00-254
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DR 99-55
RESOLUTION NO. 00-255
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF
CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1
AND 6 FOR DR 99-55
E22. Approval to Summarily Vacate 20*foot wide north-southbound alley located west of Center
Avenue between 24th Street and Humboldt Avenue V-172, requested by Northtown Housing
Development Corporation for Development Review 00-53 - APN 209-112-10, 16, 20, 29, and 30.
ITEM REMOVED FOR DISCUSSION BY COUNCILMEMBER WILLIAMS,
RESOLUTION NO. 00-256
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE SUMMARILY
VACATION OF 20-FOOT WIDE NORTH-SOUTH BOUND ALLEY
LOCATED WEST OF CENTER AVENUE BETWEEN 24TM STREET AND
HUMBOLDT AVENUE V-172 - APN: 209-112-10, 16, 20, 29 AND 30
RELATED FILE: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW00-53)
City Council Minutes
December 6, 2000
Page g
MOTION: Moved by Dutton, seconded by Biane to approve the staff recommendations in the staff
reports contained within the Consent Calendar with the exception of items 14, 16 and 22. Motion
carried unanimously 5-0.
DISCUSSION QF ITEM D14. Approval to accept bids received and award and authorize the
execution of the contract (CO 00-091) in the amount of $306,925.85 ($279,023.50 plus 10%
contingency) to the apparent low bidder, Gentry Brothers, Inc., for the construction of the
Monte Vista Street Improvements, to be funded from CDBG funds, Account No, 284333-9963
(old), 1-204-314-5650-1255-204 (new).
DISCUSSION OF ITEM D16. Approval of a Professional Services Agreement (CO 00-093) with
Dan Guerra & Associates, to provide construction survey services for the proposed Monte Vista
Street Improvements, in the amount of $15,950 ($14,500.00 plus 10% contingency), to be funded
from Community Development Block Grant Funds, Account No. 28-4333-9963 (old) or 1-204-314-
565011255-204 (new).
Councilmember Willlares asked for clarification on both item D14 and D16.
Joe O'Neil, City Engineer stated awhile back residents came to the City asking for improvements. He
stated they have listened to the residents and are trying to make these improvements to make things
better for them. He felt this would be a big improvement for this area.
MOTION: Moved by Willlares, seconded by Dutton to approve the staff recommendations listed for
items D14 and D16. Motion carried unanimously 5-0.
DISCUSSION QF ITEM D22. Approval to Su.tmhmarily Vacate 20-foot wide north-southbound
alley located west of Center Avenue between 24t Street and Humboldt Avenue V-t72, requested
by Northtown Housing Development Corporation for Development Review 00-53 -APN 209-1 t 2-
10, t6, 20, 29, and 30.
Councilmember Williams asked why this is being done.
Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, stated there are a lot of "paper alleys" in the City. He stated these vacations
are not really serving a public purpose and this will help improve the development.
MOTION: Moved by Willlares, seconded by Biane to approve the staff recommendation listed for item
D22. Motion carried unanimously 5-0.
F. CONSENT ORDINANCES
F1. CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE TO ESTABLISH A PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT OF 30
MPH ON SUGAR GUM WAY BETWEEN DAY CREEK BOULEVARD AND VICTORIA WINDROWS
LOOP
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 644.
City Council Minutes
December 6, 2000
Page 9
ORDINANCE NO. 644 (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 10.20.020 OF THE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY CODE TO ESTABLISH A PRIMA FACIE
SPEED LIMIT OF 30 MPH ON SUGAR GUM WAY BETWEEN DAY
CREEK BOULEVARD AND VICTORIA WINDROWS LOOP
MOTION: Moved by Biane, seconded by Dutton to waive full reading and approve Ordinance No. 644.
Motion carried unanimously 5-0.
F2. CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL ACTING AS THE
LEGISLATIVE BODY OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2000-01 (SOUTH ETIWANDA)
AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX IN SUCH COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 645.
ORDINANCE NO. 645 (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACTING AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-01 (SOUTH ETIWANDA)
AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX IN SUCH COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICT
MOTION: Moved by Biane, seconded by Dutton to waive full reading and approve Ordinance No.
645. Motion carried unanimously 5-0.
F3. CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL ACTING AS THE
LEGISLATIVE BODY OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2000-02 (RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CORPORATE PARK) AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX IN SUCH COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICT
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 646.
ORDINANCE NO. 646 (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACTING AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-02 (RANCHO
CUCAMONGA CORPORATE PARK) AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A
SPECIAL TAX IN SUCH COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT
MOTOIN: Moved by Biane, seconded by Dutton to waive full reading and approve Ordinance No. 646.
Motion carried unanimously 5-0.
City Council Minutes
December 6, 2000
Page ]0
G. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS
G1. CONSIDERATION OF APPEAL FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT 00-09 - PATIEL - The appeal of the Planning Commission decision to approve the
development of a 10,994 square foot church with a religious education school on 2.86 acres in the
Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at 9212 Base Line Road - APN: 202-
242-09. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration.
Staff report presented by Kirt Coury, Principal Planner.
The Council asked questions about various aspects of the project with Mr. Coury responding to their
questions.
Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the City Council were:
Karim Milbis, 6481 Napa, stated he grew up in Rancho Cucamonga and has artended many
churches within the City. He stated there are no Moslem faith churches in the City. He stated he
has met many people tonight of ~iis faith. He hoped he would have a church in the City that he
can bring his family to.
Julian Ashar of Rancho Cucamonga stated the Moslems believe in getting involved in the
community. She told about all of the things they have done to help the community every year.
She felt this center would be a benefit to the community and that people should not be afraid of
them.
Talata Kline stated they are present because of the petition signed by the neighbors. She told
about how people are supporting their community. She stated the people in their organization are
good citizens. She asked that the citizens not be denied their right of choice of religion.
Shamsul Hyper stated he is having to take his family to Riverside so they can worship. He felt
they have answered all of the issues brought up. He stated all they want is a place to worship.
Dr. Shoiab stated they hope to have good relations with their neighbors. He stated they have the
right to worship and that they are good citizens. He stated they would like to get with the
neighbors so they understand their purpose.
Ahsam Habib, Engineer for the project, talked about the building design.
Jim Frost talked about the freedom of religion. He talked about the cooperation of the churches
around where he lives.
Jerry Uribe of Rancho Cucamonga stated he lives near a church and has never had any
problems from the people that attend. He asked the Council to approve their project.
Zahar Azzawi stated having a place to worship in the City would be beneficial to him pe. rsonally.
Jo Kelagrino felt the design and the height would be a problem for her because of access around
her property. She also felt it would be a safety hazard and added she had a problem with the
hours of operation. She felt it should be moved closer to Base Line like the other churches. She
wondered why it was going to be such a large church. She also felt parking was going to be a
problem and did not feel this was a very good site.
Mayor Alexander asked if traffic had been studied.
City Council Minutes
December 6, 2000
Page t t
Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, stated yes and that no impact was found for this site.
Chief Dennis Michael stated it was also checked for public safety concerns and that there was no
problem.
Farhad Mohammad stated she wanted to raise her children correctly and supported the church.
Karla Maldonado didn't know why the house of worship could not be approved.
Rebecca Summers stated this does not have anything to do with the Moslem religion, but the
location of the church in the middle of a residential neighborhood. She stated she did not want to
look out her window and see a cross or a Star of David. She asked that this not be approved.
Mobar Hasan felt the Moslems are outstanding citizens. He felt the people that would go to this
church would be good neighbors.
Christian Henaoto stated he was disappointed with the newspaper article he read. He stated he
is actually catholic.
Dr. Mahar Rudine stated he understands the neighbors concerns, but felt this should be
approved.
Gloria Vejar felt the overflow parking that would be needed would impact the residential areas.
She felt another location should be found.
Gloria Robertson felt Base Line is inundated with traffic. She stated she cannot believe the
Planning Commission approved this. She felt this area was already congested.
Lena Khan did not think traffic or parking would be an issue for the neighbors.
There being no further response, the public hearing was closed.
Councilmember Dutton asked various questions about setback, grade separation and the perimeter
wall.
Brad Buller, City Planner, provided information to Councilmember Dutton.
Councilmember Williams commented about the two story building and added there will not be people
living in the second story, but that it is just a building with high ceilings. She also commented on the
210 Freeway stating this would help the traffic situation. She inquired when this would open.
A representative from the church commented a couple of years.
Brad Bullet, City Planner, stated staff feels there is ample parking there.
Councilmember Curatalo stated he has nothing else to add.
Councilmember Blanc asked if the perimeter wall is part of phase 1.
Brad Buller, City Planner, stated yes.
Mayor Alexander felt all of the elements of concern have been met.
City Council Minutes
December 6, 2000
Page ]2
RESOLUTION NO. 00-257
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, UPHOLDING THE ACTION OF THE
PLANNING COMMISSION AND APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT NO. 00-09 FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A NEW 10,944
SQUARE FOOT CHURCH ON 2.86 ACRES OF LAND IN THE LOW
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, LOCATED AT 9212 BASE LINE ROAD AND
MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 202-242-09
MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Curatalo to approve Resolution No. 00-257. Motion carried
unanimously 5-0.
A recess was taken at 9:25 p.m. The meeting was called back to order at 9:33 p.m. with all
Councilmembers present.
H, PUBLIC HEARINGS
No Items Submitted.
I. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS
I1. CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE THE PACIFIC ELECTRIC INLAND EMPIRE TRAIL MASTER
PLAN
Staff report and power point presentations were made by Dan Coleman, Principal Planner. He also
introduced Steve Fryson and Brad Lewis if there were any questions.
Michael Von of the Alta Loma Riding Club stated they applaud everyone that worked on this
project. He felt this would benefit the entire community.
Bob Curtis, member for Citizens for Pacific Electric Trails, stated he hoped the City would take
control of the right of way at the Etiwanda station and turn it into a museum. He stated he felt
funding should be sought for the property of the surrounding station. He felt the former pacific
electric station should be turned into a historic landmark. He recommended that any money that
SANBAG is getting from the rent to repair and restore the depot should be protected at all costs.
Mike Davenport, founder of Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail, stated they want to work with all
the cities to make this happen so that everyone is very proud of it. He thanked the Council for
approving the master plan.
MOTION: Moved by Biane, seconded by Curatalo to approve the master plan. Motion carried
unanimously 5-0.
City Council Minutes
December 6, 2000
Page 13
12. CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL ACTING AS THE
LEGISLATIVE BODY FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2000-01 (SOUTH ETIWANDA)
AUTHORIZING AND PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE OF BONDS, APPROVING THE FORM OF
THE BOND INDENTURE, BOND PURCHASE AGREEMENT (CO 00-083), PRELIMINARY OFFICIAL
STATEMENT, AND OTHER DOCUMENTS AND ACTIONS IN CONNECTION WITH THE ISSUANCE
OF BONDS. (CONTINUED FROM 11115100)
Staff report presented by Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager.
Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public comments. There being no response, public
comments was closed.
RESOLUTION NO. 00-239
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACTING IN ITS CAPACITY AS THE
LEGISLATIVE BODY OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO.
2000-01 (SOUTH ETIWANDA), AUTHORIZING AND PROVIDING FOR
THE ISSUANCE OF SPECIAL TAX BONDS OF THE DISTRICT,
APPROVING THE FORM OF BOND INDENTURE, BOND PURCHASE
AGREEMENT, PRELIMINARY OFFICIAL STATEMENT AND OTHER
DOCUMENTS AND AUTHORIZING CERTAIN ACTIONS IN
CONNECTION WITH THE ISSUANCE OF SUCH BONDS
MOTION: Moved by Dutton, seconded by Biane to approve Resolution No. 00-239. Motion carried
unanimously 5-0.
13. APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL ACTING AS THE LEGISLATIVE
BODY FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2000-02 (RANCHO CUCAMONGA CORPORATE
PARK) AUTHORIZING AND PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE OF BONDS, APPROVING THE
FORM OF THE BOND INDENTURE, BOND PURCHASE AGREEMENT (CO 00-084),
PRELIMINARY OFFICIAL STATEMENTI AND OTHER DOCUMENTS AND ACTIONS IN
CONNECTION WITH THE ISSUANCE OF BONDS. (CONTINUED FROM 11/15100)
Staff report presented by Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager.
Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public comments. There being no response, public
comments was closed.
RESOLUTION NO. 00-240
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACTING IN ITS CAPACITY AS THE
LEGISLATIVE BODY OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO.
2000-02 (RANCHO CUCAMONGA CORPORATE PARK), AUTHORIZING
AND PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE OF SPECIAL TAX BONDS OF
THE DISTRICT, APPROVING THE FORM OF BOND INDENTURE,
BOND PURCHASE AGREEMENT, PRELIMINARY OFFICIAL
STATEMENT AND OTHER DOCUMENTS AND AUTHORIZING
CERTAIN ACTIONS IN CONNECTION WITH THE ISSUANCE OF SUCH
BONDS
MOTION: Moved by Biane, seconded by Dutton to approve Resolution No. 00-240. Motion carried
unanimously 5-0.
City Council Minutes
December 6, 2000
Page 14
J. COUNCIL BUSINESS
,11. UPDATE ON SKATE PARK
Staff report presented by Dave Moore, Recreation Superintendent.
Councilmember Curatalo asked if this is patrolled periodically.
Lt. Dave Lau, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department. stated it is checked every day.
ACTION: Report received and filed.
J2. DISCUSSION OF CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEES AND SUBCOMMITTEES
The City Council reviewed the list of committees and subcommittees. A copy of the approved and
agreed upon list is on file in the City Clerk's office.
K. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
No items were identified for the next meeting.
L. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
No communication was made from the public.
M. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Moved by Dutton, seconded by Willjams to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously 5-0.
The meeting adjourned at 10:18 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Debra J. Adams, CMC
City Clerk
Approved: *
December 20, 2000
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION MINUTES
A. CALL TO ORDER
The Rancho Cucamonga City Council held a closed session on Wednesday, December 20, 2000, in
the Tapia Room of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga,
California. The meeting was called to order at 5:00 p.m. by Mayor William J. Alexander.
Present were Councilmembers: Paul Biane, James Curatalo, Bob Dutton, Diane Williams and Mayor
William J. Alexander.
Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; and James Markman, City Attorney.
B. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEMS
Mayor Alexander announced the items to be discussed in closed session.
1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL REGARDING PENDING LITIGATION, CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA VS. VANGUARD PLASTICS, INC., PER GOVERNMENT CODE
SECTION 54956.9. - CC
C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC ON CLOSED SESSION ITEMS ONLY
No one was present to comment on the closed session item.
D. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION
Closed session began at 5:00 p.m.
E. RECESS
THE CLOSED SESSION ADJOURNED AT 6:45 P.M. NO ACTION WAS TAKEN IN CLOSED
SESSION.
City Council Minutes
December 20, 2000
Page 2
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Re.qular Meeting
A. CALL TO ORDER
A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, December 20,
2000 in the Councit Chambers of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho
Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 7:07 p.m. by Mayor Alexander.
Present were Councilmembers: Paul Biane, James Curatalo, Bob Dutton, Diane Williams, and
Mayor William J. Alexander.
Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Linda D. Daniels,
Redevelopment Agency Director; James C. Frost, City Treasurer; Larry Temple, Administrative
Services Director; Lorraine Phong, Information Systems Analyst; Shelly Munson, Information
Systems Specialist; Brad Buller, City Planner; Nancy Fong, Sr. Planner; Allen Warren, Associate
Planner; Shintu Bose, Deputy City Engineer; Bill Makshanoff, Building Official; Kevin McArdle,
Community Services Director; Dave Moore, Recreation Superintendent; Captain Rodney Hoops,
Police Department; Chief Dennis Michael, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Jenny
Haruyama, Management Analyst I; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk.
B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS
B1. Congratulations to Senator Brulte on being re-appointed the Senate Republican Caucus Leader.
Mayor Alexander announced congratulations were in order to Senator Brulte and thanked him for what
he has done to help the City.
B2. Presentation of a Proclamation to Rancho Cucamonga Resident, Kevin Dorn, for his many
contributions to the community.
Mayor Alexander presented the Proclamation to Kevin Dorn. Shelley Cirrito, CCWD, gave background
information of Mr. Dorn's accomplishments within the community.
C, COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
C1. Joseph Hannah talked about the four-way stop signs on Sapphire at Lemon and at Highland.
He distributed written material for the Council to read and commented on the materials. He did not
think the stop signs should be at either location. He asked for the Council to review the material and
thought they would see the signs were not necessary.
Mayor Alexander asked for a report to come back at the next meeting to further discuss this.
City Council Minutes
December 20, 2000
Page 3
D. CONSENT CALENDAR
D1. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 11/29/00 and 12/6/00 and Payroll ending 12/7/00 for the
total amount of $3,344,534.16.
D2. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of November 30, 2000.
D3. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Civic Center East
Parking Lot Expansion.
RESOLUTION NO. 00-258
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CIVIC CENTER EAST PARKING LOT
EXPANSION IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE
CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS
D4. Approval to continue the Agreement for Janitorial Services for City-wide facilities to Coastal
Building Services of Fountain Valley in the amount of $180,500, to be funded from Fund 1001312-
5304.
D5. Approval of extension of the Memorandum of Understanding for the San Bernardino Valley Multi-
Species Habitat Conservation Plan (CO 95-017) by Amendment to December 31, 2002.
D6. Approval of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and Ordering the Annexation to
Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for DR
99-61, Eocated at the northwest corner of 7th Street and Malachite, submitted by 7th Street Pacific,
LLC.
RESOLUTION NO. 00-259
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DR 99-61
RESOLUTION NO. 00-260
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF
CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1
AND 6 FOR DR 99-61
D7. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and Ordering the Annexation
to Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 & Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 & 7 for Tract
Map 14382, north of Wilson Avenue on the west side of Cervantes Place, submitted by Mastercraft
Homes and General Electric Capital Corporation.
RESOLUTION NO. 00-261
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP NUMBER
14382, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY
City Council Minutes
December 20, 2000
Page 4
RESOLUTION NO. 00-262
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF
CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NO. 7 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 & 7
FOR TRACT MAP NUMBER 14382
D8. Approval to accept the bids received, award and authorize the execution of a contract in the
amount of $28,829.00 between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Marco Development &
Construction, Inc., of Moreno Valley (CO 00-097), and authorize the expenditure of $22,000.00 from
Fund 1001316-5602 and authorize additional appropriation of $7,000.00 from Fund 1001316-5200 for
the Corporate Yard Building Improvements.
D9. Approval of a service agreement for lender services between U.S.E. Community Services Group
(CO 00-098) and the City of Rancho Cucamonga Home Improvement Program.
D10. Approval of the Mills Act Agreement 00-03 - James and Janice Ilsley (CO 00-099) - to reduce
property tax on the Cousins House/Christmas House and property, a Historic Landmark, located at
9240 Archibald Avenue -APN: 209-321-73.
D11. Approval of an application to designate the Alta Loma School and property as a Historic
Landmark, Designation 00-04 - City of Rancho Cucamonga, located at 9488 19th Street - APN: 201-
474-02. ITEM REMOVED FOR DISCUSSION BY CITY TREASURER JAMES C. FROST.
RESOLUTION NO. 00-263
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING HISTORIC LANDMARK
DESIGNATION 00-04, DESIGNATING THE ALTA LOMA SCHOOL A
HISTORIC LANDMARK, LOCATED AT 9488 19TM STREET, AND
MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF- APN: 201~,74-02
D12. Approval of Mills Act Agreement 00-02 - Dave Rose (CO 00-100) - to reduce property tax on
the Charles E Smith House and property, a Historic Landmark, located at 9385 Lomita Avenue -
APN: 202-082-34.
D13. Approval of an application to designate the Charles E. Smith House and property as a Historic
Landmark, located at 9385 Lomita Avenue - APN: 202-082-34. ITEM REMOVED FOR DISCUSSION
BY CITY TREASURER JAMES C. FROST.
RESOLUTION NO. 00-264
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING HISTORIC LANDMARK 00-
03, DESIGNATING THE CHARLES E. SMITH HOUSE A HISTORIC
LANDMARK, LOCATED AT 9385 LOMITA AND MAKING FINDINGS IN
SUPPORTTHEREOF-APN: 202-082-34
City Council Minutes
December 20, 2000
Page 5
D14. Approval to renew the Professional Consulting Agreement (CO 99-096) for Federal Legislative
Advocacy Services with David Turch and Associates.
D15. Approval to release Faithful Performance Bond, Letter of Credit No. LG200012A, and accept as
Faithful Performance Bond, Letter of Credit No. RP2000067, for Improvements for Tract 13812,
submitted by Wealth V. LLC, located west of Etiwanda Avenue between Summit and Highland.
D16. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, and file a Notice of
Completion for Improvements for DR 97-38, submitted by Public Storage, Inc., located on the south
side of Arrow Route, between Utica Avenue and Red Oak Street.
RESOLUTION NO. 00-265
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS FOR DR 97-38 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF
A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
MOTION: Moved by Curatalo, seconded by Biane to approve the Consent Calendar with the
exception of items D11 and D13.
DISCUSSION OF ITEM D11. Approval of an application to designate the Alta Loma School and
JAMES C, FROST,
RESOLUTION NO. 00-263
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING HISTORIC LANDMARK
DESIGNATION 00-04, DESIGNATING THE ALTA LOMA SCHOOL A
HISTORIC LANDMARK, LOCATED AT 9488 19TM STREET, AND
MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF- APN: 201474-02
DISCUSSION OF ITEM D13. Approval of an application to designate the Charles E. Smith House
and property as a Historic Landmark, located at 9385 Lomita Avenue - APN: 202-082-34. ITEM
REMOVED FOR DISCUSSION BY CITY TREASURER JAMES C. FROST.
RESOLUTION NO. 00-264
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING HISTORIC LANDMARK 00-
03, DESIGNATING THE CHARLES E SMITH HOUSE A HISTORIC
LANDMARK, LOCATED AT 9385 LOMITA AND MAKING FINDINGS IN
SUPPORTTHEREOF-APN: 202-082-34
James C. Frost, City Treasurer, felt a staff report should be given to point out the significance of
these items.
Brad Bullet, City Planner, presented a staff report for items D11 and D13.
MOTION: Moved by Biane, seconded by Curatalo to approve items Dll and D13. Motion carried
unanimously 5-0
City Council Minutes
December 20, 2000
Page 6
E. CONSENT ORDINANCES
No Items Submitted.
F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS
F1. AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 00-01 - PETER J. PITASSI - A
request on behalf of the Northtown Housing Development Corporation to reduce the minimum front
yard structural setback to 21 feet by amending Development Agreement 00-01 for a previously
approved Senior Housing Overlay District in the Mixed Use District, located between the intersections
of La Orande Street and Lomita Drive on the east side of Amethyst Avenue. APN: 202-151-12.
Staff report presented by Brad Buller, City Planner. Alan Warren, Associate Planner, gave a power
point presentation.
Mayor AIexander opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the City Council was:
Nacho Gracia, Northtown Housing Development Corporationl stated he was here to answer any
questions the Council might have. He felt this was a housekeeping matter and concurred with
staffs recommendation.
There being no further comments, the public hearing was closed.
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 647.
ORDINANCE NO. 647 (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 00-01, A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED
SENIOR HOUSING OVERLAY DISTRICT IN THE MIXED USE
DISTRICT, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF AMETHYST AVENUE,
BETWEEN LA GRANDE STREET AND LOMITA DRIVE AS PROVIDED
FOR IN SECTION 65864 OF THE CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE,
AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN: 202-151-12
MOTION: Moved by Dutton, seconded by Williams to waive full reading and set second reading of
Ordinance No. 647 for the January 3, 2001 meeting. Motion carried unanimously 5-0.
ITEM F2 WAS REMOVED FROM THE AGENDA AND WOULD BE READVERTISED PRIOR TO
BEING RETURNED TO THE COUNCIL FOR CONSIDERATION.
F2. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 00-02A - LEWIS
RETAIL CENTERS - A request to change the General Plan land use designation from Low
Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) to Neighborhood Commercial for 1.244 acres (Lot 73 of Tract
15875), located at the northeast corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Highland Avenue - APN: 227-
351-65. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration.
(CONTINUED FROM NOVEMBER '1, 2000)
City Council Minutes
December 20, 2000
Page '7
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 00-02 -
LEWIS RETAIL CENTERS - A request to change the Victoria Community Plan land use designation
from Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) to Village Commercial for 1.244 acres (Lot 73 of
Tract 15875), located at the northeast corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Highland Avenue. The City
will also consider Community Plan text changes to better define the scope of Village Commercial
development in the immediate area - APN: 227-351.65. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration
of environmental impacts for consideration. (CONTINUED FROM NOVEMBER 1, 2000)
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 00-02C - CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to change the General Plan land use designation from Low
Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) to Neighborhood Commercial for approximately .24 acre
adjacent to the east side of Lot 73 of Tract 15875 near the northeast corner of Day Creek Boulevard
and Highland Avenue. Related files: General Plan Amendment 00-02A, Victoria Community Plan
Amendment 00-02, and Victoria Community Plan Amendment 00-03. Staff has prepared a Negative
Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. (CONTINUED FROM NOVEMBER I, 2000)
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 00-03 -
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to change the Victoria Community Plan land use
designation from Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) to Village Commercial for .24 acre
adjacent to the east side of Lot 73 of Tract 15875 near the northeast corner of Day Creek Boulevard
and Highland Avenue. The City will also consider community plan text changes to better define the
scope of Village Commercial development in the immediate area. Related files: General Plan
Amendment 00-02A, Victoria Community Plan Amendment 00-02, and General Plan Amendment 00-
02C. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration.
(CONTINUED FROM NOVEMBER I, 2000)
RESOLUTION NO. 00-233
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT 00-02A, A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE GENERAL PLAN
LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM LOW RESIDENTIAL (2-4 DWELLING
UNITS PER ACRE) TO NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL FOR 1.244
ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF DAY
CREEK BOULEVARD AND HIGHLAND AVENUE, AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF- APN: 227-881.01
ORDINANCE NO. 641 (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VICTORIA COMMUNITY
PLAN AMENDMENT 00-02, A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE LAND USE
DESIGNATION FROM LOW RESIDENTIAL (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER
ACRE) TO VILLAGE COMMERCIAL FOR 1.244 ACRES OF LAND
LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF DAY CREEK
BOULEVARD AND HIGHLAND AVENUE AND MAKING TEXT
AMENDMENTS TO THE DESCRIPTION OF THE VILLAGE
COMMERCIAL DESIGNATION, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT
THEREOF-APN: 227-881-01
City Council Minutes
December 20, 2000
Page g o
RESOLUTION NO. 00-234
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT 00-02C, A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE GENERAL PLAN
LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM LOW RESIDENTIAL (2-4 DWELLING
UNITS PER ACRE) TO NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL FOR .24
ACRES OF LAND LOCATED NEAR THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF
DAY CREEK BOULEVARD AND HIGHLAND AVENUE, AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF
ORDINANCE NO. 642 (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VICTORIA COMMUNITY
PLAN AMENDMENT 00.03, A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE GENERAL
PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM LOW RESIDENTIAL (2-4
DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO VILLAGE COMMERCIAL FOR .24
ACRES OF LAND LOCATED NEAR THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF
DAY CREEK BOULEVARD AND HIGHLAND AVENUE, AND MAKING
TEXT AMENDMENTS TO THE DESCRIPTION OF THE VILLAGE
COMMERCIAL DESIGNATION, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT
THEREOF
F3. ENVIRONMENT ASSESSMENT FOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 098-02, VICTORIA
COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 98-01, AND ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 98-01 -
AMERICAN BEAUTY DEVELOPMENT CO. - A review of the previously certified Environmental
Impact Report and the consideration of approving the Statement of Findings and Overriding
Consideration for the proposed project known as Victoria Arbors Village.
Staff report and power point presentation by Nancy Fong, Sr. Planner.
Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the City Council were:
John Lyons of Etiwanda stated he opposed the plan and felt the land should be left commercially
zoned. He felt this land would help to make revenue for the City if it were left zoned commercial.
Wyneth Pazudo felt it should be left as it is and did not think it would benefit anything by changing
it.
Jack Shine, American Beauty, stated they concur with staffs recommendation and asked for the
Council to approve this.
There being no further response, the public hearing was closed.
Councilmember Dutton asked various questions about the project with City Planner Brad Buller
answering them.
Councilmember Williams felt it was good to point out there would be a mixed use at this site and felt this
was a good idea. She stated she supported this.
City Council Minutes
December 20. 2000
Page 9
RESOLUTION NO. 00-266
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,_APPROVING THE STATEMENT OF
FACTS AND FINDINGS AND THE STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING
CONSIDERATIONS FOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 98-02,
VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 98-01, AND ETIWANDA
SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 98-01, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN
SUPPORT THEREOF
MOTION: Moved by Dutton, seconded by Biane to approve Resolution No. 00-266. Motion carried
unanimously 5-0.
F4. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 98-02, VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 98-01,
AND ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 98-01 - AMERICAN BEAUTY DEVELOPMENT
C__O. - A public hearing for a proposed project to be known as the Victoria Arbors Village on
approximately 291.8 acres of land in the Victoria Planned Community, generally bounded by Base
Line Road to the north, Etiwanda Avenue to the east, future Church Street & Victoria Loop Road to
the south, and Day Creek Channel to the west -APN: 227-201-04, 13 through 18, 22, 28 through 31,
33, & 36; 227-161-28, 31, 33, 35, 36 & 38; 227-171-08, 11, 12, 20, 22, 23 & 25; & 227-211.40.
A. Change the Land Use for approximately 232.8 acres of land from Low-Medium
Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per
acre), Medium-High Residential (18-24 dwelling units per acre), Community Facilities,
Regional Related Office/Commercial, Office Professional, and Park to Mixed Use.
B. Amend the Circulation and Parks and Recreation Elements of the General Plan.
C. Amend the land use, various graphics, and test for the Victoria Community Plan.
D. Change the boundaries of the Victoria Community Plan to include approximately 27
acres of land from the Etiwanda Specific Plan generally located at the northwest
quadrant of Efiwanda Avenue and Church Street; change the zoning from Office
Professional to Mixed Use; and consider retaining the area in the Etiwanda Specific
Plan.
Related file: Victoria Community Plan Amendment 00-04.
SEE DISCUSSION UNDER F3 FOR THIS ITEM.
RESOLUTION NO. 00-267
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT 98-02, CHANGING THE LAND USE MAP FROM LOW-
MEDIUM, MEDIUM, AND MEDIUM-HIGH RESIDENTIAL; COMMUNITY
FACILITIES; REGIONAL RELATED OFFICE/COMMERCIAL; OFFICE
PROFESSIONAL; AND PARK TO MIXED USE FOR APPROXIMATELY
232.8 ACRES OF LAND GENERALLY BOUNDED BY BASE LINE ROAD
TO THE NORTH, ETIWANDA AVE. TO THE EAST, FUTURE CHURCH
STREET AND VICTORIA LOOP ROAD TO THE SOUTH, DAY CREEK
CHANNEL TO THE WEST; AND MAKING CHANGES TO THE
CIRCULATION AND PARK AND RECREATION ELEMENTS OF THE
GENERAL PLAN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -
APN: 227-201-04, 13 THROUGH 18, 22, 28 THROUGH 31, 33, AND 36;
City Council Minutes
December 20, 2000
Page ]0
227-161-28, 31, 33, 35 36AND 38; 227-171-08, 11, 12, 20, 22, 23, AND
25; AND 227-211-40
MOTION: Moved by Dutton, seconded by Biane to approve Resolution No. 00-267. Motion carried
unanimously 5-0.
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 648 and 649.
ORDINANCE NO. 648 (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VICTORIA COMMUNITY
PLAN AMENDMENT 98-01, CHANGING THE ZONING FROM LOW-
MEDIUM, MEDIUM, AND MEDIUM-HIGH RESIDENTIAL; COMMUNITY
FACILITIES; REGIONAL RELATED OFFICE/COMMERCIAL; AND PARK
TO MIXED USE FOR APPROXIMATELY 205.8 ACRES OF LAND
GENERALLY BOUNDED BY BASE LINE ROAD TO THE NORTH,
ETIWANDA AVENUE TO THE EAST, FUTURE CHURCH STREET AND
VICTORIA LOOP ROAD TO THE SOUTH, AND DAY CREEK CHANNEL
TO THE WEST; AND APPROVING VARIOUS CHANGES TO THE TEXT
AND GRAPHICS OF THE VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN, AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227-201-04, 13 THROUGH
18, 22, 28 THROUGH 31, 33, AND 36; 227-161-28, 31, 33, 35, 36 AND
38; 227-171-08, 20, 22, AND 23, AND 227-211-40
ORDINANCE NO. 649 (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ETIWANDA SPECIFIC
PLAN AMENDMENT 98-01, CHANGING THE ZONING FROM OFFICE
PROFESSIONAL TO MIXED USE FOR APPROXIMATELY 27 ACRES
OF LAND LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST QUADRANT OF
ETIWANDA AVENUE AND CHURCH STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS
IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227-171-11, 12- AND 25
MOTION: Moved by Dutton, seconded by Willlares to waive full reading and set second reading of
Ordinance Nos. 648 and 649 for January 3, 2001.
F5. VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 00-04 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A
request to change the name of Victoria Lakes Village to Victoria Arbors Village within the Victoria
Planned Community. Related file: General Plan Amendment 98-02, Victoria Community Plan
Amendment 98-01, and Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment 98-01.
SEE DISCUSSION UNDER F3 FOR THIS ITEM.
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 640
ORDINANCE NO. 650 (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VICTORIA COMMUNITY
PLAN AMENDMENT 00-04, A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE NAME OF
VICTORIA LAKES VILLAGE TO VICTORIA ARBORS VILLAGE WITHIN
VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT
THEREOF
City Council Minutes
December 20, 2000
Page t 1
MOTION: Moved by Dutton, seconded by W]Uiams to waive full reading and set second reading of
Ordinance No. 650 for January 3, 2001.
F6. CONSIDERATION TO AMEND THE WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES
ORDINANCE, CHAPTER 17.26 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA DEVELOPMENT CODE,
AMENDMENT 00-03, TO ALLOW THE DEVELOPMENT OF MAJOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION
FACILITIES WITHIN 300 FEET OF A RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE OR RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
Staff report presented by Brad Buller, City Planner.
Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing
was closed. ·
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 651.
ORDINANCE NO. 651 (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE
AMENDMENT 00-03, AMENDING SECTION 17.26.030 -
DEVELOPMENT CRITERIA FOR ALL WIRELESS COMMUNICATION
FACILITIES, TO REDUCE THE DISTANCE THAT A MAJOR WIRELESS
COMMUNICATION FACILITY MUST BE LOCATED FROM A
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE, OR OTHER
MAJOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITY FROM 500 FEET
MINIMUM TO 300 FEET MINIMUM
MOTION: Moved by Curatalo, seconded by Biane to waive full reading and set second reading of
ordinance No. 651 for January 3, 2001. Motion carried unanimously 5-0.
F7. CONSIDERATION QF A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A NEW COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE FOR
PERMITS AND SERVICES PROVIDED BY ALL CiTY DEPARTMENTS, THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA POLICE
DEPARTMENT, BY MODIFYING CERTAIN FEES ESTABLISHED IN RESOLUTION 99-146 AND 99-
146A
Staff report presented by Larry Temple, Administrative Services Director.
Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing
was closed.
RESOLUTION NO. 00-268
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A NEW
COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE FOR PERMITS AND SERVICES
PROVIDED BY ALL CITY DEPARTMENTS, THE RANCHQ
CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA POLICE DEPARTMENT, BY MODIFYING CERTAIN
FEES ESTABLISHED IN RESOLUTIONS 99-146 AND 99-146A
MOTION: Moved by Biane, seconded by Curatalo to approve Resolution No. 00-268. Motion carried
unanimously 5-0.
City Council Minutes
December 20, 2000
Page 12
G. PUBLIC HEARINGS
No Items Submitted.
H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS
No Items Submitted,
I. COUNCIL BUSINESS
I1. PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE
ACTION: Report received and filed,
J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
No items were identified for the next meeting,
K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
No communication was made from the public,
L. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Moved by Curatalo, seconded by Williams to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously 5-0.
The meeting adjourned at 8:02 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Debra J. Adams, CMC
City Clerk
Approved: *
January 3, 2001
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Re.qular Meetin.q
A. CALL TO ORDER
A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, January 3, 200 1
in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho
Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 7:04 p.m. by Mayor William J.
Alexander.
Present were Councilmembers: Paul Biane, Bob Dutton, Diane Willlares, and Mayor William J.
A~exander.
Also present were: Jack Lain, City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Linda D. Daniels,
Redevelopment Agency Director; Larry Temple, Administrative Services Director; Tamam Layne,
Finance Officer; Sid Siphomsay, Information Systems Analyst; Michael Toy, Information Systems
Specialist; Dan Coleman, Principal Planner; Shintu Bose, Deputy City Engineer; Alan Brock, Plan
Check Manager/Building; Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director; Deborah Clark, Library
Director; Captain Rodney Hoops, Police Department; Chief Dennis Michael, Rancho Cucamonga
Fire Protection District; Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager; Jenny Haruyama, Management
Analyst I; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk.
Absent was Councilmember: Curatalo
B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS
B1. Presentation of a Proclamation to K-FRG for its support and assistance with the 2000 Spark of
Love Toy Drive.
Mayor Alexander presented the Proclamation to Scott Ward. Bo Wiltrow, Liz Rivera and Sam Spagnolo
of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District.
B2.Presentation of GFOA's Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial reporting for the
Fiscal Year ended June 30, 1999.
Brent Mason, GFOA, presented the award to Tamara Layne, Finance Officer and Larry Temple,
Administrative Services Director.
C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
C1. Nacho Gracia, Northtown Housing Development Corporation thanked the Fire District and KFRG
for their efforts with the Spark of Love Toy Drive.
C2. John Lyons talked about an exchange student that visited him and how she told him Rancho
Cucamonga was like paradise. He wanted to let the Council know this.
City Council Minutes
January 3, 2001
Page 2
D. CONSENT CALENDAR
D1. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 12/13/00 and 12/20/00 and Payroll ending 12/21/00 for the
total amount of $2,031,869.54.
D2. Approvat to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Construction of 6th Street
Pavement Rehabilitation from Milliken Avenue to Charles Smith Avenue, to be funded from Account
No. 10-4637-9905 (11703035650/1198170).
RESOLUTION NO. 01-001
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF 6TM STREET PAVEMENT
REHABILITATION FROM MILLIKEN AVENUE TO CHARLES SMITH
AVENUE IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE
CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS
D3. Approval of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and Monumentation Cash Deposit
for Tract Map Number 15766, located on the north side of Base Line Road, approximately 800' west
of Victoria Park Lane, and release of previously submitted Improvement Agreement and Improvement
Security accepted by City Council on December 16, 1998, from R.C. Apartments L.L.C.
RESOLUTION NO. 01-002
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AND MONUMENTATION
CASH DEPOSIT AND RELEASING THE IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
PREVIOUSLY ACCEPTED BY CITY COUNCIL ON DECEMBER 16,
1998
D4. Approval of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security, Ordering the Annexation to
Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2 for Tract
No. 15914 located west of Hermosa Avenue and north of Hillside Street, submitted by Cal West
Enterprises-APN: 1074-071-20.
RESOLUTION NO. 01-003
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP NUMBER
15914, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY
FOR TRACT MAP NO. 15914
RESOLUTION NO. 01-004
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF
CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND
2 FOR TRACT 15914
City Council Minutes
January3, 2001
Page 3
D5. Approval to award and authorize the execution of the Professional Services Agreement for the
construction survey of the Metrolink Station, Phase II Project, to Associated Engineers (CO 01-001),
in an amount not to exceed $33,860.00, to be funded from Regional Choice Transit Capital
Improvement Funds, Account No. 12303035650/12255-230.
D6. Approval of request to enter into Communications Site Ground Lease Agreement at East Beryl
Park between AT & T Wireless Services, inc., a Delaware Corporation (CO 01-002), and the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, for the purpose of installing a Wireless Communication Facility for AT & T's
Personal Communication Service.
D7. Approval to award and authorize the execution of the Professional Services Agreement for the
Soils and Materials Testing of the Metrolink Station Expansion, Phase II Project, to RMA Group (CO
01-003), in an amount not to exceed $28,322.00, to be funded from Regional Choice Transit Capital
Improvement Funds, Account No. 12303035650/1225-230.
DB. Approval of a Resolution approving the form of a Joint Community Facilities Financing
Agreement (CO 01-004) by and between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Etiwanda School
District pertaining to the formation of the Rancho Etiwanda Public Facilities Community Facilities
District No. 1 by the Etiwanda School District.
RESOLUTION NO. 01-005
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE FORM OF A JOINT
COMMUNITY FACILITIES FINANCING AGREEMENT BY AND
BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE
ETIWANDA SCHOOL DISTRICT PERTAINING TO THE FORMATION
OF THE RANCHO ETIWANDA PUBLIC FACILITIES COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1
D9. Approval of Consulting Agreement (CO 01-005) providing transitional consulting services for the
Community Development Department.
DIO. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, accept a
Maintenance Bond and file a Notice of Completion for Improvements for Tracts 12659, -2, -3 and -4,
submitted by Centex Homes, a Nevada General Partnership, located on the southwest corner of
Etiwanda and Wilson Avenues.
RESOLUTION NO. 01-006
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACTS 12659, -2, -3 AND -4 AND
AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE
WORK
[:)11. Approval to accept the Construction of Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting at three locations,
Rochester Avenue and Vintage Drive, Rochester Avenue and Victoria Park Lane, Carnelian Street
and Highland Avenue, Contract No. 99-002, as complete, release the bonds, and authorize the City
Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final contract amount of $385,880.00.
City Council Minutes
January 3, 2001
Page 4
RESOLUTION NO. 01-007
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE TRAFFIC SIGNALS
AND SAFETY LIGHTING PROJECT AT THREE LOCATIONS,
ROCHESTER AVENUE AND VINTAGE DRIVE, ROCHESTER AVENUE
AND VICTORIA PARK LANE, CARNELIAN STREET AND HIGHLAND
AVENUE, AS COMPLETE AND AUTHORIZE THE FILING OF A NOTICE
OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
D12. Approval to accept the Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting at Carnelian Street and La Vine/La
Grande Streets, Contact No. 00-016 as complete, release the bonds, accept a maintenance bond and
authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final contract amount of
$146,539.22.
RESOLUTION NO. 01-008
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING AT
CARNELIAN STREET AND LA VINE/LA GRANDE STREETS,
CONTRACT NO. 00-016, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A
NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
MOTION: Moved by Dutton, seconded by Willlares to approve the staff recommendations in the staff
reports contained within the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unanimously 4-0-1 (Curatalo absent).
E. CONSENT ORDINANCES
El. AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 00-01 - PETER J. PITASSI - A
request on behalf of the Northtown Housing Development Corporation to reduce the minimum front
yard structural setback to 21 feet by amending Development Agreement 00-01 for a previously
approved Senior Housing Overlay District in the Mixed Use District, located between the intersections
of La Grande Street and Lomita Drive on the east side of Amethyst Avenue. APN: 202-151-12.
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 647.
ORDINANCE NO. 647 (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 00-01, A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED
SENIOR HOUSING OVERLAY DISTRICT IN THE MIXED USE
DISTRICT, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF AMETHYST AVENUE,
BETWEEN LA GRANDE STREET AND LOMITA DRIVE AS PROVIDED
FOR IN SECTION 65864 OF THE CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE,
AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF- APN: 202-151-12
MOTION: Moved by Biane, seconded by Curatalo to waive full reading and approve Ordinance
No.647. Motion carried unanimously 4-0-1 (Curatalo absent).
City Council Minutes
January3, 2001
Page 5
E2. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 98-02, VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 98-01,
AND ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 98-01 - AMERICAN BEAUTY DEVELOPMENT
CO. - A public hearing for a proposed project to be known as the Victoria Arbors Village on
approximately 291.8 acres of land in the Victoria Planned Community, generally bounded by Base
Line Road to the north, Etiwanda Avenue to the east, future Church Street & Victoria Loop Road to
the south, and Day Creek Channel to the west -APN: 227-201-04, 13 through 18, 22, 28 through 31,
33, & 36; 227-161-28, 31, 33, 35, 36 & 38; 227-171-08, 11, 12, 20, 22, 23 & 25; & 227-211.40.
A. Change the Land Use for approximately 232.8 acres of land from Low-Medium
Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per
acre), Medium-High Residential (18-24 dwelling units per acre), Community Facilities,
Regional Related Office/Commercial, Office Professional, and Park to Mixed Use.
B. Amend the Circulation and Parks and Recreation Elements ofthe General Plan.
C. Amend the land use, various graphics, and test for the Victoria Community Plan.
D. Change the boundaries of the Victoria Community Plan to include approximately 27
acres of land from the Etiwanda Specific Plan generally located at the northwest
quadrant of Etiwanda Avenue and Church Street; change the zoning from Office
Professional to Mixed Use; and consider retaining the area in the Etiwanda Specific
Plan.
Related file: Victoria Community Plan Amendment 00-04.
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 648 and 649.
ORDINANCE NO. 648 (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VICTORIA COMMUNITY
PLAN AMENDMENT 98-01, CHANGING THE ZONING FROM LOW-
MEDIUM, MEDIUM, AND MEDIUM-HIGH RESIDENTIAL; COMMUNITY
FACILITIES; REGIONAL RELATED OFFICE/COMMERCIAL; AND PARK
TO MIXED USE FOR APPROXIMATELY 205.8 ACRES OF LAND
GENERALLY BOUNDED BY BASE LINE ROAD TO THE NORTH,
ETIWANDA AVENUE TO THE EAST, FUTURE CHURCH STREET AND
VICTORIA LOOP ROAD TO THE SOUTH, AND DAY CREEK CHANNEL
TO THE WEST; AND APPROVING VARIOUS CHANGES TO THE TEXT
AND GRAPHICS OF THE VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN, AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227-201-04, 13 THROUGH
18, 22, 28 THROUGH 31, 33, AND 36; 227-161-28, 31, 33, 35, 36 AND
38; 227-171-08, 20, 22, AND 23, AND 227-211-40
ORDINANCE NO. 649 (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ETIWANDA SPECIFIC
PLAN AMENDMENT 98-01, CHANGING THE ZONING FROM OFFICE
PROFESSIONAL TO MIXED USE FOR APPROXIMATELY 27 ACRES
OF LAND LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST QUADRANT OF
ETIWANDA AVENUE AND CHURCH STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS
IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227-171-11, 12- AND 25
MOTION: Moved by Biane, seconded by Dutton to waive full reading and approve Ordinance Nos.
648 and 649. Motion carried unanimously 4-0-1 (Curatalo absent).
City Council Minutes
Janua~ 3, 2001
Page 6
F3. VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 00-04 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A
request to change the name of Victoria Lakes Village to Victoria Arbors Village within the Victoria
Planned Community. Related file: General Plan Amendment 98-02, Victoria Community Plan
Amendment 98-01, and Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment 98-01.
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 650.
ORDINANCE NO. 650 (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
GUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VICTORIA COMMUNITY
PLAN AMENDMENT 00-04, A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE NAME OF
VICTORIA LAKES VILLAGE TO VICTORIA ARBORS VILLAGE WITHIN
VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT
THEREOF
MOTION: Moved by Biane, seconded by Dutton to waive full reading and approve Ordinance No.
650. Motion carried unanimously 4-0-I (Guratalo absent).
F4. CONSIDERATION TO AMEND THE WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES
ORDINANCE, CHAPTER 17.26 OF THE RANGHO GUCAMONGA DEVELOPMENT CODE,
AMENDMENT 00-03, TO ALLOW THE DEVELOPMENT OF MAJOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION
FACILITIES WITHIN 800 FEET OF A RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE OR RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 651.
ORDINANCE NO. 651 (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE
AMENDMENT 00-03, AMENDING SECTION 17.26.030 -
DEVELOPMENT CRITERIA FOR ALL WIRELESS COMMUNICATION
FACILITIES, TO REDUCE THE DISTANCE THAT A MAJOR WIRELESS
COMMUNICATION FACILITY MUST BE LOCATED FROM A
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE, OR OTHER
MAJOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITY FROM 500 FEET
MINIMUM TO 300 FEET MINIMUM
MOTION: Moved by Biane, seconded by Dutton to waive full reading and approve Ordinance No.
651. Motion carried unanimously 4-0-1 (Curatalo absent).
F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS
No Items Submitted.
G. PUBLIC HEARINGS
No Items Submitted.
City Council Minutes
January 3, 2001
Page ?
H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS
NO Items Submitted.
I. COUNCIL BUSINESS
No Items Submitted.
J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
No items were identified for the next meeting.
K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
No communication was made from the public.
L. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Moved by Dutton, seconded by Williams to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously 4-0-1
(Curatalo absent). The meeting adjourned at 7:29 p.m.
Respectfully submitted.
Debra J. Adams, CMC
City Clerk
Approved: *
January 17, 2001
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION MINUTES
A. CALL TO ORDER
The Rancho Cucamonga City Council held a closed session on Wednesday, January 17, 2001, in
the Tapia Room of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga,
California. The meeting was called to order at 5:40 p.m. by Mayor William J. Alexander.
Present were Councilmembers: Paul Biane, James Curatalo, Diane Williams and Mayor William J.
Alexander.
Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; Crair Fox, Assistant City Attorney; and Brad Buller, City
Planner.
Absent was Councilmember: Dutton
B. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEMS
Mayor Alexander announced the items to be discussed in closed session.
1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL--ANTICIPATED LIGITAGION--INITIATION OF
LITIGATION PURSUANT TO SUBDIVISION (c) OF SECTION 54956.9 (ONE CASE). - CC
C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC ON CLOSED SESSION ITEMS ONLY
No one was present to comment on the closed session item.
D. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION
Closed session began at 5:40 p.m.
E. ADJOURNMENT
THE CLOSED SESSION ADJOURNED AT 6:25 P.M. NO ACTION WAS TAKEN IN CLOSED
SESSION.
City Council Minutes
January 17, 2001
Page 2
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Regular MeetinN
A, CALL TO ORDER
A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, January 17,
2001 in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho
Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 7:30 p.m. by Mayor William J.
Alexander.
Present were Councilmembers: Paul Biane, James Curatalo, Diane Williams, and Mayor William J.
Alexander.
Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; Craig Fox, Assistant City Attorney; Linda D. Daniels,
Redevelopment Agency Director; Mitch Slagerman, Sr. RDA Analyst; Flavio Nunez, Assistant RDA
Analyst; Larry Temple, Administrative Services Director; Joe Kamrani, Sr. Information Systems
Analyst; Charles Scott, Sr. Information Systems Specialist; Brad Buller, City Planner; Shintu Bose.
Deputy City Engineer; Dan James, Sr. Civil Engineer; Bill Makshanoff, Building Official; Dave Moore,
Recreation Superintendent; Paula Pachon, Management Analyst III, Jodi Sorrell, Marketing
Manager; Deborah Clark, Library Director; Captain Rodney Hoops, Police Department; Chief Dennis
Michael, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager;
Jenny Haruyama, Management Analyst I; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk.
Absent was Councilmember: Dutton
B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS
B1. Recognition of Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation's Founder's Nigh Gala Sponsors and
Ambassadors.
Jodi Sorrell, Marketing Manager, gave a power point presentation about the gala.
Members of the Foundation were present to recognize the sponsors and ambassadors.
C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
C1. Tony Mize mentioned the passing of Ralph Lewis and talked about his contributions to the City.
He stated the family has done so much for the City and also contributed to the Foundation Gala.
Councilmember Curatalo added the community is a better place because of Ralph Lewis.
D. CONSENT CALENDAR
D1. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 12/27/00 and 1/04/01 for a total amount of $1,499,783.72.
D2. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of December 31, 2000.
City Council Minutes
January 17, 2001
Page 3
D3. Approval to authorize the advedising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the construction of Traffic
Signals and Safety Lighting at Rochester Avenue and Lark Drive, to be funded from Transportation
Fee Funds, Account No. 1-124-303-5650/1254-124.
RESOLUTION NO. 01-009
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND
SAFETY LIGHTING AT ROCHESTER AVENUE AND LARK DRIVE IN
SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO
ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS
D4. Approval of a Request for Waiver of Epicenter Special Event Area Rental Fees for the Local
Chapter of the California Association of School Transportation Official's School Bus Roadeo to be
held on March 23-24, 2001.
D5. Approval to purchase one (1) Ford Explorer from Fairview Ford of San Bernardino, California, in
the amount of $24,319.72 from Account No. 10013025604 (14373-7045).
D6. Authorization to Purchase Two IBM RS/6000 Servers (Hardware & Software) from IBM
Corporation through the State of California Multiple Award Schedule (CMAs), Procurement Division,
2000 Contract, 3-94-70-0032 in the Amount of $45,000 from Account 1714001-5605 as Approved in
FY 2000/2001 Budget.
D7. Approval of a Resolution authorizing the destruction of City Records pursuant to California
Government Code Section 34090, the City's Records Retention Schedule, and other applicable legal
citations.
RESOLUTION NO. 01-010
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE DESTRUCTION OF
CITY RECORDS WHICH ARE NO LONGER REQUIRED AS SET
FORTH IN CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 34090 AND
OTHER APPLICABLE LEGAL REFERENCES
D8. Approval of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and Ordering the Annexation to
Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6, for DR
99-75, located at the northwest corner of Jersey and Rochester Avenues, submitted by Jersey Park,
LLC.
RESOLUTION NO. 01-011
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DR 99-75
RESOLUTION NO. 01-012
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF
CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1
AND 6 FOR DR 99-75
City Council Minutes
January 17, 2001
Page 4
D9. Approval of License Agreement between San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG)
and the City of Rancho Cucamonga (CO 01-006) for the Underground Storm Drain Crossing across
the SANBAG property (Baldwin Park Branch Tract) generally located on the west side of Day Creek
Boulevard between Victoria Park Lane and Railroad Avenue Norfh, for Tentative Tract 16081, by
Trimark Pacific Homes, L.P.
RESOLUTION NO. 01-013
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCH[:)
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING LICENSE AGREEMENT
FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 16081, STORM DRAIN INSTALLATION AND
MAINTENANCE ON SAN BERNARDINO ASSOCIATED
GOVERNMENT'S PROPERTY
D10. Approval to award contract to Complete Coach Works (CO 01-007) to recondition City-owned
Omnitrans vehicle into a Bookmobile at a cost not to exceed $55,000.
D11. Approval to accept the construction of Hermosa Avenue Street and Storm Drain Improvements
on the east side of Hermosa Avenue 2000 feet south of Wilson Avenue, Contract No. 00-068, as
complete, release the bonds and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and
approve the final contract mount of $62,558.63.
RESOLUTION NO. 01-014
A RESOLUTION QF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE CONSTRUCTION QF
HERMOSA AVENUE STREET AND STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS
ON THE EAST SIDE OF HERMOSA AVENUE 2000 FEET SOUTH OF
WILSON AVENUE, CONTRACT NO. 00-068 AND AUTHORIZE THE
FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
D12. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, accept a
Maintenance Bond and file a Notice of Completion for Improvements for DR 99-53, submitted by
Fairway Business Centre, L.L.C., a California Limited Liability Company, located on the west side of
Anaheim Place and Azusa Courf.
RESOLUTION NO. 01-015
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS FOR DR 99-53 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING QF
A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
MOTION: Moved by Curatalo, seconded by Willjams to approve the staff recommendations in the staff
reports contained within the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unanimously 4-0-1 (Dutton).
E. CONSENT ORDINANCES
No Items Submitted.
City Council Minutes
January 17, 2001
Page 5
F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS
F1. CONSIDERATION OF DESIGNATION OF CHERRY LANE AS A PRIVATE STREET, THEREBY
EXEMPTING THE ABUTTING PROPERTIES FROM REQUIREMENTS SET FORTH IN CHAPTER
12.08 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE.
Jack Lam, City Manager, stated the request for this has been withdrawn and there is no support for this.
He asked that the Council remove the item from tonight's agenda.
RESOLUTION NO. 01-016
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DESIGNATING CHERRY LANE AS A
PRIVATE STREET AND EXEMPTING THE ABUTTING PROPERTIES
FROM REQUIREMENTS SET FORTH IN CHAPTER 12.08 OF THE
MUNICIPAL CODE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN CONDITIONS
ACTION: Item removed from agenda as suggested above.
G. PUBLIC HEARINGS
No Items Submitted.
H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS
H1. APPROVAL OF A REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF FEES FOR THE EPICENTER STADIUM FROM
THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PROFESSIONAL CLUB FOR A PUBLIC WORKOUT BY THE
CALIFORNIA ANGELS ON JANUARY 29, 31 AND FEBRUARY 3, 2001.
Staff report presented by Paula Pachon, Management Analyst III.
Pat Fillipone, General Manager of the Quakes, stated they are now involved with the Angels instead of
the Padres. He talked about the event and the activities planned for it. He also informed everyone
about their upcoming season.
MOTION: Moved by Willlares, seconded by Biane to approve the request. Motion carried unanimously
4-0-1 (Dutton).
I. COUNCIL BUSINESS
City Council Minutes
January 17, 2001
Page 6
I1. PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE
ACTION: Report received and filed.
12. RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR ACCEPTANCE FROM THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION
COMMISSION REGARDING AN ANNEXATION PROPOSAL INITIATED BY THE CHAFFEY JOINT
UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT
Staff report presented by Jack Lam, City Manager.
MOTION: Moved by Willlares, seconded by Biane to approve staffs recommendation. Motion
carried unanimously 4-0-1 (Dutton absent).
J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
See item brought up under RDA "Identification of Items".
K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
No communication was made from the public.
L. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Moved by Curatalo, seconded by Willjams to adjourn in the memory of Ralph Lewis.
Motion carried unanimously 4-0-1 (Dutton absent). The meeting adjourned at 8:03 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Debra J. Adams, CMC
City Clerk
Approved: *
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 01/25/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 1
THU, JAN 25, 2001, 2:20 PM --req: CGONZALE--leg:. GL JL--loc: FINANCE---job: 19274 #S059 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Tlnpe Subs Rel To Note
Ap00163821 001472 KUNDA, EDWARD 01/25/01 384.82 ~ IP
AP00163822 000339 LAM, JACK 01/25/01 500.00 MW IP
AP00163823 001473 REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF 01/25/01 270.00 ~ IP
GRAND TOTALS:
Total Void Machine Written 0.00 Number of Checks processed: 0
Total Void Hand Written 0.00 Nu~3er of Checks Processed: 0
Total Machine Written 1,154.82 Number of Checks processed: 3
Total Hand Written 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 0
Total Reversals 0.00 Number of Checks processed: 0
I~]~ Total Cancelled Checks 0.00 Number of Checks processed: 0
GRAND TOTAL 1,154.82
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 01/24/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 1
WED, JAN 24, 2001, 4:24 PM --req: KFINCHER--leg: GL JL--loc: FINANCE---j ob: 18974 #S050 ..... proD: CK200 <1.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00163593 000835 4 CON ENGINEERING INC 01/24/01 6,255.86 MW OH
AP00163594 004635 A~ND K PHOTOGRAPHY 01/24/01 29.68 MW OH
AP00163595 000010 A~ND R TIRE SERVICE 01/24/01 5,297.26 MW OH
AP00163596 000001 AA EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO INC 01/24/01 110.87 MW OH
AP00163597 006271 ABBEY EVENTS SERVICES 01/24/01 454,67 MW OH
AP00163598 006011 ABC SCHOOL SUPPLY INC 01/24/01 42,65 MW OH
AP00163599 006309 ADANSON, RONALD 01/24/01 1,888.00 MW OH
AP00163600 005231 AEF SYSTEMS CONSULTING INC 01/24/01 1,155.00 MW OH
AP00163601 004970 ALBERTSONS 01/24/01 204.66 MW
AP00163602 000496 ALEYj~NDER, WILLI~34 J 01/24/01 36.00 MW
AP00163603 005650 ALTA LOMA PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC 01/24/01 3,700.00 MW OH
AP00163604 000492 AMERICAN PLJ~NNING ASSOCIATION 01/24/01 2,160.00 MW
AP00163605 006510 AON CONSULTING ~ INSURANCE 01/24/01 1,650.00 MW OH
AP00163606 005807 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 01/24/01 2,592,00 MW OH
AP00163607 VOID.CONTINU Void - Continued Stub 01/24/01 0,00 VM OH Void
AP00183608 000667 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 01/24/01 9,436.12 MW OH
AP00163609 000026 ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS 01/24/01 2,084.00 MW OH
AP00163610 000402 AUTO RESTORATORS 01/24/01 412.79 MW OH
AP00163611 004475 BARNES AND NOBLE 01/24/01 250.00 MW
AP00163612 006527 BEYOND.COM 01/24/01 12.36 MW
AP00163613 006107 CALTAC 01/24/01 65.00 MW
AP00163614 001061 CH3~MpION AWARDS ~ SPECIALIE 01/24/01 1,103,36 MW OH
AP00163615 006052 C}{ARTER COMMLrNICATIONS 01/24/01 41.40 MW OH
AP00163616 001337 CIESLIK, DANIEL 01/24/01 128.00 MW OH
AP00163617 000073 CITRUS MOTORS ONTARIO INC 01/24/01 391.49 MW
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 01/24/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 2
WED, J~2g 24, 2001, 4:24 PM --req: KFINCHER--leg: GL JL--loc: FINANCE---j ob: 18974 #S050 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00163618 000074 CITY RENTALS 01/24/01 41.08 MW OH
AP00163619 000914 CLAREMONT CAMERA~2qD VIDEO IN 01/E4/01 80.57 MW OH
AP00163620 004537 CLASS SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS 01/24/01 3,495.00 MW OH
AP00163621 004949 CLOUT 01/24/01 32.00 MW OH
AP00163622 001425 CODI 01/24/01 225.00 MW OH
AP00163623 004301 COMP USA INC 01/24/01 1,328.70 MW OH
AP00163624 000130 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 01/24/01 38,588.00 MW OH
AP00163625 000643 COMPUTERL/~qD 01/24/01 2,979.29 MW OH
AP00163626 001424 CONCORDIA R C 20 LLC 01/24/01 1,319.00 MW OH
AP00163627 001428 CPRS PARK OPERATIONS 01/24/01 50.00 MW OH
AP00163628 001437 CPRS 01/24/01 269.00 MW OH
AP00163629 001438 CPRS 01/24/01 50.00 MW OH
AP00163630 001439 CPRS 01/24/01 269.00 MW OH
AP00163631 005713 CPRS 01/24/01 135.00 MW OH
AP00163632 VOID.CONTINU Void - Continued Stub 01/24/01 0.00 VM OH Void
AP00163633 000085 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 01/24/01 17,140.04 MW OH
AP00163634 002512 D A R E AMERICA 01/24/01 41.82 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00163635 000239 D AND K CONCRETE COMP~/gY 01/24/01 3,047.03 MW OH
Ap00163636 002478 DAPPER TIRE CO 01/24/01 1,944.15 MW OH
AP00163637 001438 DAVID DEVELOPMENT INC 01/24/01 1,000.00 MW OH
Ap00163638 001290 DEER CREEK CAR WASH 01/24/01 35.00 MW OH
AP00163639 000901 DENTON, ROBIN 01/24/01 55.00 MW OH
AP00163640 003909 DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION 01/24/01 7,998.16 ~FW OH
AP00163641 000107 DETCO 01/24/01 16.55 MW OH
AP00163642 000839 DIETERICH INTERNATIONAL TRUCK 01/24/01 96.80 MW OH
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 01/24/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 3
WED, J~/q 24, 2001, 4:24 PM --req: KFINCHER--leg: GL JL--loc: FINANCE---job: 18974 #S050 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00163643 006536 EASTER, pAMELA 01/E4/01 200.00 MW OH
AP00163644 003364 EIGHTH AVENUE GRAPHICS 01/24/01 2,648.50 MW OH
AP00163645 001429 EL JALAPENO MEXICAN FOOD 01/24/01 34.51 MW
AP00163646 003614 ELITE TOWING 01/24/01 150.00 MW OH
AP00163647 004524 ELLISON EDUCATIONAL EQUIPMENT 01/24/01 46.17 MW OH
AP00163648 005137 EMPIRE MOBILE HOME SERVICE 01/24/01 2,071.44 MW OH
AP00163649 090520 EMPLOYMENT SYSTEMS INC. 01/24/01 5,617.42 MW ON
AP00163650 001431 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES JOINT 01/24/01 30.00 MW OH
AP00163651 001433 EXCEL SYSTEMS AND SOLUTIONS 01/24/01 65.14 MW ON
AP00163652 005521 EXPERI/~N 01/24/01 50.00 MW OH
AP00163653 001207 F A/qD W pUBLICATIONS INC 01/24/01 234.52 MW OH
AP00163654 005917 FASTENAL COMPLY 01/24/01 120.57 MW OH
AP00163655 002909 FILTER RECYCLING SERVICE INC 01/24/01 145.00 MW ON
AP00163656 006556 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 01/24/01 3,475.95 MW OH
AP00163657 004371 FISHER SCIENTIFIC 01/24/01 668.91 MW OH
AP00163658 006440 FLUORESCO LIGHTING 01/24/01 155.75 MW OH
AP00163659 002840 FOPjD OF UPL/UqD INC 01/24/01 198.26 MW OH
AP00163660 006074 FUKUSHIMA, JUDITH 01/24/01 810.00 MW OH
AP00163661 004540 GALE GROUP,THE 01/24/01 145.19 MW ON
AP00163662 003356 GARCIA, VIVI/~N 01/24/01 21.13 MW ON
AP00163663 005955 GOLDEN WEST DISTRIBUTING 01/24/01 74.16 MW OH
AP00163664 004367 HENBERGER CO INC, JOHN C 01/24/01 894.33 MW OH
AP00163665 000158 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 01/24/01 2,572.25 MW ON
AP00163666 003633 HOMELESS OUTREACH PRGMS AND E 01/24/01 224.00 MW ON
Ap00163667 003634 HOUSE OF RUTH 01/24/01 633.00 MW ON
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 01/24/01 C H E C K E E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 4
WED, JAN 24, 2001, 4:24 PM --req: KFINCHER--leg: GL JL--loc: FINAiqCE---job: 18974 #S050 ..... prog: CK200 <1.37>--report id: CKREG°--
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check ~znount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00163668 001942 HYDRO TEK SYSTEMS INC 01/24/01 355.08 ~ OH
AP00163669 000495 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 01/24/01 45.20 MW OH
AP00163670 001218 INDUSTRIAL DISTRIBLF~ION GROUP 01/24/01 126.43 MW OH
AP00163671 005193 IN~fERACTIVE DATA CORPORATION 01/24/01 75.00 MW OH
AP00163672 006196 INTEP~NAL REVEN]]E SERVICE 01/24/01 2,422.34 MW OH
AP00163673 003452 INTRAVAIA ROCK ~2qD S~qD 01/24/01 110.00 ~ OH
AP00163674 000171 JACKSON HIRSH INC 01/24/01 57.45 MW OH
AP00163675 000612 JAESCHKE INC, C R 01/24/01 26.46 MW OH
AP00163676 005654 F~APCO 01/24/01 816.60 MW OH
AP00163677 000297 L A SIGNAL INC 01/24/01 9,815.53 MW OR
AP00163678 000849 Lj~WSON PRODUCTS INC 01/24/01 813.70 MW OH
AP00163679 005884 LILBUR/~ CORPOP~ATION 01/24/01 7,146.50 MW OH
Ap00163680 000250 ~L~RTINEZ TOWING AiqD ALrFOMOTIV 01/24/01 135.00 MW OH
AP00163681 003871 ~U~TT'S HARDWARE 01/24/01 36.56 MW OH
AP00163682 002995 MCMURP~AY ~2qD STER~ 01/24/01 2,255.69 ~ OH
AP00163683 001365 MICKEY, BRENT 01/24/01 660.00 MW OH CC
AP00163684 005885 MORITA, DU/~NE 01/24/01 3,675.00 MW OH CC
AP00163685 000842 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAI 01/24/01 112.21 MW OR
AP00163686 000433 NIXONEGLI EUIPMENT 01/24/01 346.91 MW OH
AP00163687 004853 OCLC INC 01/24/01 31.59 MW OH
AP00163688 000523 OFFICE DEPOT 01/24/01 1,292.65 MW OH
AP00163689 005461 ORCH3~RD SUPPLY H~RDWARE 01/24/01 1,661.54 MW OH
AP00163690 001824 ORIENTAL TRADING 01/24/01 108.45 MW OH
AP00163691 000235 OWEN ELECTRIC 01/24/01 2,569.84 MW OH
AP00163692 000338 PACIFIC EQUIP ~ IRRIGATION 01/24/01 69.32 MW OH
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 01/24/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 5
WED, JAN 24, 2001, 4:24 PM ~-req: KFINCHER--leg: GL JL--loc: FIN~2qCE---jOb: 18974 #S050 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note
Ap00163693 001823 PAGENET 01/24/01 283.62 MW OH
AP00163694 000818 pARAGON BUILDING PRODUCTS INC 01/24/01 9.92 MW OH
Ap00163695 000757 PEP BOYS 01/24/01 10.75 ~q OH
AP00163696 003293 pERFOP~CE AUTO BODY 01/24/01 5,742.03 M]q OH
AP00163697 006148 PIRON, S}L~L~q 01/24/01 144.00 MW OH CC
AP00163698 000255 pOMA DISTRIBLPTING CO 01/24/01 11,940.12 MW OH
AP00~63699 003952 POMONA INL VALLEY CNCL OF CHU 01/24/01 1,012.50 ~FW OH
AP00163700 001049 POMONA VALLEY ~WASAKI 01/24/01 315.23 MW OH
AP00163701 000065 pRUDENTIAL OVER3~LL SUPPLY 01/24/01 22.23 MW
AP00163702 000251 R ~ R AUTOMOTIVE 01/24/01 3,424.68 ~FW OH
Ap00163703 003663 R ~ T SPECCIALTY INC 01/24/01 1,288.02 MW OH
AP00~63704 000418 R M A GROUP 01/24/01 406.50 MW OH
Ap00163705 001205 R3~INBOW BOOK COMPANY 01/24/01 1,418.98 MW OH
Ap00163706 000264 PJ~LPHS GROCERY COMP/~NY 01/24/01 153.18 MW OH
AP00163707 005174 R~_NCHO CUC~MONGA F~4ILY YMCA 01/24/01 500.00 MW OH
Ap00163708 006329 R~_NCHO TRANSMISSION SERVICE 01/24/01 1,823.04 MW OH
Ap00163709 004130 RBM LOCK ~ KEY SERVICE 01/24/0t 71.55 MW OH
AP00163710 006501 REED, JOHN 01/24/01 1,000.00 MW OH
Ap00163711 005665 REGULATION COMPLI~qCE INC 01/24/01 12,928.30
Ap00163712 001423 HILYN CONSTRUCTION, INC 01/24/01 10.76 MW OH
AP00163713 000276 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 01/24/01 16.46 MW OH
Ap00163714 000016 ROTARY CORPORATION 01/24/01 138.48 MW
Ap00163715 001004 S ~ S WORLDWIDE 01/24/01 1,649.03 MW OH
Ap00163716 005745 SAFELITE GLJ~SS CORP 01/24/01 432.72 ~ OH
Ap00163717 005538 S~2q ~NTONIO MATERIALS 01/24/01 204.33 MW OH
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 01/24/01 C E E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 6
WED, JAN 24, 2001, 4:24 PM --req: KFINCRER--leg: GL JL--lOC: FINANCE---job: 18974 #S050 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG-~-
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check ~/nount Type Subs Rel To Note
Ap00163718 000301 S~N BERN COUNTY SHERIFFS 01/24/01 949,630.33 MW OH
Ap00163719 000301 SAN BERN COUNTY SHERIFFS 01/24/01 2,011.95 MW OH
AP00163720 000305 SAN BERN COUNTY TRANSPORTATIO 01/24/01 17,925.00 MW OH
AP00163721 000150 SAN BERN COUNTY 01/24/01 60,850.00 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00163722 000132 SAN DIEGO ROTARY BROOM CO INC 01/24/01 510.74 MW OH
AP00163723 001426 SASSEE, LOREE 01/24/01 45.00 MW OR
AP00163724 001105 SEAL FURNITURE AND SYSTEM INC 01/24/01 833.32 MW OH
AP00163725 000351 SIGN SHOP, THE 01/24/01 424.39 MW OR
Ap00163726 001101 SIRIUS COMPUTER SOLOUTIONS 01/24/01 183.18 MW OH
AP00163727 001327 SMART/l/qD FINAL 01/24/01 885.62 MW OH
AP00163728 000319 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 01/24/01 2,121.58 MW OH
AP00163729 VOID.CONTINU Void - continued stub 01/24/01 0.00 VM OH Void
AP00163730 VOID.CONTINU Void - Continued Stub 01/24/01 0.00 VM OH Void
AP00163731 VOID.CONTINU Void - Continued Stub 01/24/01 0.00 VM OH Void
AP00163732 001432 SOUTHERN CALIFOR/qIA EDISON 01/24/01 6,573.73 MW OR
AP00163733 006660 SPINDLER CONSTRUCTION 01/24/01 268.40 MW OH
Ap00163734 003606 SPORTS TURF MANAGERS ASSOCIAT 01/24/01 120.00 MW OR
AP00163735 004176 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION 01/24/01 1,282.00 MW OH
AP00163736 003632 STEELWORKERS OLDTIMERS FOUNDA 01/24/01 1,583.79 MW OH
AP00163737 004733 SUNRISE FORD 01/24/01 242.90 MW OH
Ap00163738 005685 SURE SHRED DOCUMENT DESTRUCTI 01/24/01 20.00 MW OH
Ap00163739 011963 SYS ADMIN 01/24/01 39.00 MW OH
Ap00163740 005410 T AND D INSTALLJ~TIONS 01/24/01 221.16 MW OH
AP00163741 003738 TANNER, O C 01/24/01 697.04 MW OH
Ap00163742 001440 TARBELL REALTORS 01/24/01 22.99 MW OH
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 01/24/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 7
WED, JAN 24, 2001, 4:24 PM --req: KFINQNER--leg: GL JL--loc: FINANCE---job: 18974 ~S050 ..... prog: CK200 <1.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note
Ap00163743 002344 TARGET 01/24/01 285.59 MW OH
AP00163744 001356 TIMS DRAPERY SERVICE 01/24/01 1,782.00 MW OH
AP00163745 001919 TOMARK SPORTS INC 01/24/01 518.37 MW OH
Ap00163746 001449 TORAL, MODESTO 01/24/01 177.00 MW OH
AP00163747 001451 TORO COMPANY 01/24/01 300.00 MW OH
AP00163748 001450 TORRES,AURORA,A/~D T RILEY 01/24/01 5,000.00 MW OH
AP00163749 001454 U S DISTRICT COURT 01/24/01 40.00 MW OH
Ap00163750 001447 UCLA EXTENSION 01/24/01 235.00 MW OH
AP00163751 001452 ULLOA, OFELIA 01/24/01 75.00 NW OH
AP00163752 004206 UNIQUE CREATIONS 01/24/01 18.97 MW OH
Ap00163753 006004 LFNITEK TECHNOLOGY INC 01/24/01 6,426.21 MW OH
AP00163754 003214 URISA 01/24/01 120.00 MW OH
Ap00163755 000350 US pOSTMASTER 01/24/01 550.00 MW OH
AP00163756 000137 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 01/24/01 1,591.98 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
Ap00163757 001443 WASHINGTON SUITES 01/24/01 585.00 MW OH
Ap00163758 001444 WASHINGTON SUITES 01/24/01 390.00 ~FW OH
Ap00163759 001445 WASHINGTON SUITES 01/24/01 585.00 MW OH
Ap00163760 001446 WASHINGTON SUITES 01/24/01 585.00 MW OH
Ap00163761 002681 WILLII~MS, DI/~NE 01/24/01 30.00 MW ON
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 01/24/01 C E E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER PaSe 8
WED, JAN 24, 2001, 4:24 PM --req: KFINCHER--leg: GL JL--loc: FINANCE---job: 18974 ~S050 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note
GRAND TOTALS:
Total Void Machine Written 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 5
Total Void Hand Written 0.00 Nu~Der of Checks Processed: 0
Total Machine Written 1286,522.26 Number of Checks Processed: 164
Total Hand Written 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 0
Total Reversals 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 0
Total Cancelled Checks 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 0
G R A N D T O T A L 1286,522.26
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 01/17/01 C H E C K R E O I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 1
WED, J~/q 17~ 2001, 5:51 PM --req: CGONZALE--leg: GL JL--loc: FIN~a4CE---job: 17733 ~S043 ..... prog: CK300 <l.37>--report id= CKREO---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type subs Rel To Note
AP00163356 006451 A ~ A AUTOMOTIVE 01/17/01 90.00 MW OH
AP00163357 000001 AA EQUIPMEN'P RENTALS CO INC 01/17/01 7,857.07 MW OH
AP00163358 003732 ABC LOCKSMITHS 01/17/01 478.13 MW OH
AP00163359 006011 ABC SCHOOL SUPPLY INC 01/17/01 447.85 MW OH
AP00163360 001334 ABIAC 01/17/01 308.99 MW OH
AP00163361 001336 ALBANO, STEPPL~NIE 01/17/01 143.50 MW OH
AP00163362 003269 ALTA LOMA SCHOOL DISTRICT 01/17/01 455.00 MW OH
AP00163363 006354 AMAZON.COM 01/17/01 1,500.00 MW OH
AP00163364 006354 A~ZON.COM 01/17/01 1,000.00 MW OH
Ap00163365 004450 AMERICAN LIBRARY ASSOCIATION 01/17/01 65.00 MW OH
AP00163366 004450 AMERICAN LIBRARY ASSOCIATION 01/17/01 195.00 MW OH
Ap00163367 000492 AMERICAN pLANNING ASSOCIATION 01/17/01 394.00 MW OH
AP00163368 001405 ASHLAND DISTRIBUTION CO 01/17/01 12.00 MW OH
AP00163369 001402 ASSOCIATED POWER INC 01/17/01 19,995.17 MW OH
Ap00163370 001335 AUTO EXPRESS 01/17/01 200.00 MW OH AR
Ap00163371 004103 B ~ K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 01/17/01 1,049.06 MW OH
AP00163372 006747 B ~ R AUTO SERVICE 01/17/01 64.27 b~4 OH
AP00163373 001311 E~24TA, TRACI 01/17/01 300.00 MW OH
AP00163374 006748 BEARINGS/5/qD DRIVES 01/17/01 249.10 MW OH
AP001633~ 004333 SELLSOUTH WIRELESS DATA LP 01/17/01 10,701.07 MW OH
AP00163376 001406 BERTINO AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE 01/17/01 6.48 MW OH
Ap00163377 001247 BLAKE PAPER CO INC 01/17/01 115.17 MW OH
Ap00163378 005859 BRENNAN, CHERYL 01/17/01 150.00 MW OH
Ap00163379 001357 BRICKEN AND ASSOCIATES, GORDO 01/17/01 1,050.00 MW OH
Ap00163380 001408 CACE 01/17/01 40.00 MW' OH
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 01/17/01 C B E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 2
WED, JAN 17, 2001, 5:51 PM --req: CGONZALE--leg: GL JL--loc: FINANCE---j ob: 17723 #S043 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>-oreport id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00163381 001851 CAL WESTERN PAINT 01/17/01 2,020.31 MW OH
AP00163382 001223 CALSENSE 01/17/01 951.69 MW OH
AP00163383 001407 CALVERO, RICARDO 01/17/01 65.00 MW OH
AP00163384 004689 CAMPL~ ON THE BAY 01/17/01 1,072.48 MW OH
AP00163385 001404 CANAC KITCHENS U S LIMITED 01/17/01 225.10 MW OH
AP00163386 002382 CASK N CLEAVER 01/17/01 42.00 MW OH
AP00163387 006520 CDNOW INC 01/17/01 1,000.00 MW OH
AP00163388 000068 CENTRAL CITIES SIGNS INC 01/17/01 2,786.57 MW OH
AP00163389 001333 CENTRAL DIVISION 01/17/01 162.67 MW OH
AP00163390 006052 CHi~RTER COF~4UNICATIONS 01/17/01 250.00 N~q OH
AP00163391 006052 CPEARTER COF~ICATIONS 01/17/01 1,807.60 MW OH
AP00163392 005958 CHIVERS AUDIO BOOKS 01/17/01 6.50 MW OH
AP00163393 001337 CIESLIK, DANIEL 01/17/01 124.00 MW OH
AP00163394 004654 CLAYTON, JANICE 01/17/01 146.00 MW OH
AP00163395 006215 CM SCHOOL SUPPLY 01/17/01 148.01 MW OH
AP00163396 002470 COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY 01/17/01 9.82 MW OH
Ap00163397 001328 CONC/~NNON, SHARI 01/17/01 149.50 MW OH
AP00163398 006709 COPP CRUSHING, D~ 01/17/01 80.00 MW OH
AP00163399 001330 COLTNTY OF OR/~GE 01/17/01 346.67 MW OH
AP00163400 001321 COURT TRUSTEE 01/17/01 309.38 MW
AP00183401 001409 CPSRPTC 01/17/01 219.00 MW OH
AP00163402 000085 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 01/17/01 6,880.13 MW OH
AP00163403 001403 CUFF TRUCKING 01/17/01 30.00 MW OH
Ap00163404 000604 CYBERCOM RESOURCES INC 01/17/01 3,900.00 MW OH
AP00163405 000239 D ~ K CONCRETE COMPANY 01/17/01 602.32 MW OH
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 01/17/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 3
WED, JAN 17, 2001, 5:51 PM --req: CGONZALE--leg: GL JL--lOC: FIN~/qCE---job: 17723 ~S043 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00163406 001387 DALY, JASON 01/17/01 16.25 MW OH
AP00163407 002110 DEPA/~TMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES 01/17/01 34.00 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00163408 004544 DICK, ERIC 01/17/01 417.50 MW OH
AP00163409 000839 DIETERICH INTERNATIONAL TRUCK 01/17/01 463.04 MW OR
AP00163410 001388 DRESNER, MAUREEN 01/17/01 60.00 MW OH
AP00163411 000916 EDUCATIONAL SOFTWARE INSTITUT 01/17/01 210.83 MW OH
AP00163412 003364 EIGHTH AVENITE GRAPHICS 01/17/01 10.78 MW OH
AP00163413 001389 FAR/~G, /~ANI 01/17/01 60.00 MW OH
AP00163414 001390 F~a~REN, C3%ROL 01/17/01 60.00 MW OH
AP00163415 021571 FIELDSTONE COb~4UNITIES INC 01/17/01 7.51 MW OH
AP00163416 004762 FOOTHILL FAMILY SHELTER 01/17/01 250.00 MW OH
AP00163417 001144 FPJ~ME ART 01/17/01 12.93 MW OH
AP00163418 001335 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 01/17/01 137.23 MW OH
AP00163419 005928 G E SUPPLY 01/17/01 665.86 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00163420 004540 GALE GROUP,THE 01/17/01 547.47 MW OH
AP00163421 001391 GATEWAY PLASTERING INC 01/17/01 202.07 MW OH
AP00163422 001152 GCS SERVICES 01/17/01 309.40 MW OH
AP00163423 002834 GEIGER BROTHERS WEST 01/17/01 211.72 MW OH
AP00163424 001066 GENGLER KENNETH C 01/17/01 200.00 MW OH AR
AP00163425 003507 GOVERNING 01/17/01 30.00 MW OH
AP00163426 000650 GRAINGER, WW 01/17/01 612.29 MW OH
AP00163427 001392 GRAY, B/~RBAPJ~ 01/17/01 41.00 MW OH
AP00163428 003827 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 01/17/01 769.31 MW OH
AP00163429 000462 HCS CUTLER STEEL CO 01/17/01 21.01 MW OH
AP00163430 001372 HOLIDAY INN EXPRESS 01/17/01 475.36 MW OR
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 01/17/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 4
WED, J~/g 17, 2001, 5:51 PM --req: CGONZALE--leg: GL JL--loc: FINANCE--~j ob: 17723 ~S043 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id= CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00163431 000158 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 01/17/01 26.40 MW OH
AP00163432 003633 HOMELESS OUTREACH PRGMS ~ E 01/17/01 399.00 ~ OH
AP00163433 004414 HOOD, KARYE 01/17/01 15,88 ~q OH
AP00163434 032289 HURST, JOHN 01/17/01 50.00 MW OH
AP00163435 006513 IAPMA 01/17/01 150.00 ~ OH
AP00163436 003276 ICI DULUX PAINT CENTERS 01/17/01 230.80 ~q OH
AP00163437 004188 ID BURR 01/17/01 153.75 MW OH
AP00163438 000908 INI~5.ND MEDIATION BOARD 01/17/01 1,673.17 MW OH
AP00163439 002315 INLA~ID WHOLESALE NURSERY ~01/17/01 835.71 ~ OH
AP00163440 006082 INSTITUTE OF TRANSPORTATION E 01/17/01 542.88 MW OH
AP00163441 005193 INTER]~CTIVE DATA CORPORATION 01/17/01 75.00 MW OH
AP00163442 001370 INTERSTATE BRANDS CORP 01/17/01 36.00 ~F~ OH
AP00163443 004822 Fj~R3~TSU, ROBERT 01/17/01 91.97 MW OH
AP00163444 006034 KOOPM~2~ LOIS M 01/17/01 200.00 MW OH AR
AP00163445 001142 KOWALEWSKI, JUAN 01/17/01 3,300.00 MW OH
AP00163446 000945 KRULETZ, LARRY 01/17/01 500.00 MW OH
AP00163447 001379 LA FRENZ, CHARLENE 01/17/01 46.00 MW OH
AP00163448 006073 L~ pOINTE VIDEO pRODUCTION, J 01/17/01 2,418.32 MW OH CC
Ap00163449 000088 LA VOZ 01/17/01 96.00 MW OH
Ap00163450 004217 ~j~DNER COATINGS 01/17/01 4,391.00 MW OH
AP00163451 ~00321 LANDSCAPE WEST INC 01/17/01 129,203.07 MW OH
AP00163452 091209 I~SER LINE 01/17/01 124,77 MW OH
Ap00163453 000849 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC 01/17/01 181.72 MW OH
AP00163454 000197 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 01/17/01 162,00 MW OH
AP00163455 001005 LIL STITCH 01/17/01 123.20 MW OH CC
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 01/17/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 5
WED, JAN 17, 2001, 5:51 PM --req: CGONZj~LE--leg! GL JL--loc: FIN/~NCE---job: 17723 ~5043 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG-~-
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00163456 005274 LI~[LE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 01/17/01 225.00 MW OH CC
AP00163457 001378 LONG, FL~RY 01/17/01 82.00 MW OH
AP00163458 001455 LONGS DRUGS 01/17/01 73.03 MW OH
AP00163459 001336 LOWER, DARLENE 01/17/01 251.00 MW OH
AP00163460 001062 M C I WOP~LDCOM 01/17/01 2,636.26 MW OH .,
AP00163461 001393 ~{~aqDY, KEVIN 01/17/01 3,259.85 MW OH
AP00163462 004727 MARSH3~LL PLUT~BING 01/17/01 506.00 MW OH CC
AP00163463 005283 MAYER, COBLE ~ PALMER 01/17/01 1,225.00 MW OH CC
AP00163464 002198 MICHAELS STORES INC 3019 01/17/01 298.49 MW OH
AP00163465 001365 MICKEY, BRENT 01/17/01 660.00 MW OH CC
AP00163466 005852 MIDWEST TAPE 01/17/01 359.88 MW OH
AP00163467 001371 MIGUEL INVESTORS LTD, DON 01/17/01 20.00 MW OH
AP00163468 000749 MIJAC ALARM COMP/~rY 01/17/01 65.00 MW ON
AP00163469 003860 MOBILE MINI INC 01/17/01 379.08 MW OH
AP00163470 004374 MOBILE STORAGE GROUP INC 01/17/01 135.34 MW OH
AP00163471 001163 MOFFITT WILLIAM JR 01/17/01 200.00 MW OH AR
AP00163472 001332 N M A DUES C/O BARBARA WHITE 01/17/01 13.85 MW OH
AP00163473 002248 NAPA AUTO PARTS 01/17/01 1,136.57 MW OH
Ap00163474 001383 NEAG, PATTY 01/17/01 65.00 MW OH
AP00163475 001331 NELSON, SUSAN 01/17/01 473.00 MW OH
AP00163476 002361 NEWPORT TRAFFIC STUDIES 01/17/01 305.00 MW OH CC
Ap00163477 VOID.CONTIN~3 Void - Continued Stub 01/17/01 0.00 VM OH Void
Ap00163478 000523 OFFICE DEPOT 01/17/01 3,909.34 MW OH
Ap00163479 001398 OLT~L~/q'E INVESTMEbFr CO 01/17/01 2,600.00 MW OH
AP00163480 032135 OLYMPIC TREE SALES 01/17/01 500.00 MW OH
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 01/17/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 8
WED, J~/q 17, 2001, 5:51 PM --req: CGONZALE--leg: GL JL--loc: FIN~/~CE---job: 17723 ~S043 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00163481 001824 ORIE~FFAL TR3tDING 01/17/01 164.35 MW OH
Ap00163482 001376 ORWIG, DELORES 01/17/01 44.00 MW OH
Ap00163483 000235 OWEN ELECTRIC 01/17/01 2,107.59 MW OH
AP00163484 000338 PACIFIC EQUIP ~aqD IRRIGATION 01/17/01 138.30 MW OH
Ap00163485 006287 PACIFICARE OF CALIFOP~NIA 01/17/01 36,201.00 ~ OH
Ap00163486 006668 PAIRING THE TOWN 01/17/01 7,534.50 MW
Ap00163487 000818 PA~GON BUILDING PRODUCTS INC 01/17/01 25.86 ~ OH
AP00163488 006755 PARSONS BRINKE~OFF QU~E ~ 01/17/01 24,327.96 MW OH
Ap00163489 001382 PAWLOWSKI, MONICA 01/17/01 102.00
AP00163490 006141 PC WORLD 01/17/01 33.97 MW OH
Ap00163491 022061 PENINSU~ LIB~RY SYSTEM 01/17/01 50.00 MW
AP00163492 001325 PETEr, CHERYL 01/17/01 445.50 MW OH
AP00163493 006148 PIRON, S~ 01/17/01 108.00 MW OH CC
Ap00163494 006~06 p~ING CE~ER, THE 01/17/01 8,422.02 MW OH CC
Ap00163495 006206 p~ING CE~ER, THE 01/17/01 20,280.25 MW OH CC
Ap00163496 001380 POLI, KELLIE 01/17/01 60.00 MW
Ap00163497 000693 POWERSTRIDE BATTERY CO INC 01/17/01 ~31.05 ~ OH
AP00163498 000758 p~IR DISTRIB~ION INC 01/17/01 180.52 MW OH
Ap00163499 003286 PRINCIPAL LIFE 01/17/01 102,082.95 MW OH
Ap00163500 000583 PROTECTION SERVICE I~USTRIES 01/17/01 369.52 ~ OH
Ap00163501 001374 QUAI~CE, TY 01/17/01 335.00
Ap00163502 001323 QUI~, ZITA 01/17/01 193.00 MW
Ap00163503 000251 R~ R A~OMOTIVE 01/17/01 468.54 MW OH
Ap00163504 000070 ~CHO CUC~ONGA C~BER 01/17/01 120.00 MW OH
Ap00163505 01~053 ~CHO CUC~ONGA COMITY FO 01/17/01 20.00 ~ OH
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 01/17/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 7
WED, JAN 17, 2001, 5:51 PM --req: CGONZALE--leg: GL JL--loc: FINANCE---job: 17723 #S043 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00163506 000170 RANCHO CUCAMONGA EMPLOYEE ACT 01/17/01 660.00 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00163507 000207 RANCHO MINI STORAGE 01/17/01 510.00 MW OH
AP00163508 001324 REINT{ARDTSEN, DEBRA 01/17/01 282.50 MW OH
AP00163509 005618 RICHARDS WATSON A/gD GERSHON 01/17/01 7,786.75 MW OH
AP00163510 000276 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 01/17/01 111.84 MW OH
AP00163511 001322 RIVERSIDE CO DEPT CHILD SUPPO 01/17/01 226.00 MW OH
AP00163512 000626 ROBLEE ER, RAUL P 01/17/01 201.50 MW OH
AP00163513 001394 ROENICKE, DEBRA 01/17/01 60.00 MW OH
AP00163814 004704 RUSH, CHRIS 01/17/01 252.45 MW OH
AP00163515 000454 S C C C A 01/17/01 60.00 MW OH
AP00163516 000214 S}ag BERN COUNTy 01/17/01 . 2,321.19 MW OH
AP00163517 004350 SCHNEIDERWENT, F3~REN 01/17/01 75.45 MW OH
AP00163518 008089 SCHOLASTIC BOOK FAIRS 01/17/01 2,277.14 MW OH
AP00163519 001105 SEAL FURNITURE ~a4D SYSTEM INC 01/17/01 760.00 MW OH
AP00163520 001395 SEDIGHI, BEHZAD 01/17/01 60.00 MW OH
AP00163521 001829 SEARED TECHNOLOGY FAIRCHILD T 01/17/01 159,769.41 MW
AP00163522 001396 SILVA, MICHELLE 01/17/01 75.00 MW OH
AP00163523 001101 SIRIUS COMPUTER SOLOUTIONS 01/17/01 50.44 MW OH
AP00163524 001397 SLAY,DEMITRIA 01/17/01 65.00 MW OH
AP00163525 VOID.CONTIN~3 Void - Continued Stub 01/17/01 0.00 VM OH Void
AP00163526 001432 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 01/17/01 20,597.06 MW OH
Ap00163527 000902 STATE OF CA DEPARTMENT OF TRA 01/17/01 6,475.63 MW OH
AP00163528 005281 STERICYCLE INC 01/17/01 138.82 MW OH
AP00163529 007256 STOFA, JOSEPH 01/17/01 25.00 MW OH
AP00163530 006385 SUNGAP/) BI TECH INC 01/17/01 47,635.67 MW
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 01/17/01 C R E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 8
WED, JAN 17, 2001, 5:51 PM --req: CGONZALE--leg: GL JL--loc: FIN~2qCE---jOb: 17723 #S043 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00163531 004733 SUNRISE FORD 01/17/01 399.30 MW OH
AP00163532 005685 SURE SHRED DOCUMENT DESTRUCTI 01/17/01 20.00 MW OH
AP00163533 004445 T ~ G ROOFING 01/17/01 275.00 MW OH
AP00163534 002344 TARGET 01/17/01 880.25 MW OH
AP00163535 003942 TERMINIX INTEP~NATIONAL 01/17/01 1,102.00 MW OH
AP00163536 003388 TRUGREEN L~qDCARE REGIONAL 01/17/01 39,605.00 MW OH
AP00163537 006554 TURCR ~jqD ASSOCIATES, DAVID 01/17/01 4,000.00 MW OH
AP00163538 007271 UNGASRICK, JULIE 01/17/01 60.27 MW OH
AP00163539 003437 UNIFIRST UNIFOP~4 SERVICE 01/17/01 3,268.61 MW OH
AP00163540 005601 UNIQUE ~j~NAGEMEN~r SERVICES IN 01/17/01 248.39 MW OH
AP00163541 002682 UNITED STATES POSTAL.SERVICE 01/17/01 4,500.00 MW OH
AP00163542 000919 UNITED WAY 01/17/01 612.57 MW OH
AP00163543 006004 UNITEK TECHNOLOGY INC 01/17/01 107.75 MW OH
AP00163544 004296 UPSCO 01/17/01 300.00 MW OH
AP00163545 012516 URSUA, DEBBIE 01/17/01 25.00 MW OH
AP00163546 004558 US GUARDS CO INC 01/17/01 2,510.69 MW OH
AP00163547 001399 VALENCIA, ELE~NOR 01/17/01 120.00 MW OH
AP00163548 001400 VASQUEZ, LAWRENCE 01/17/01 60.00 MW OH
AP00163549 000137 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 01/17/01 382.78 MW OE Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00163550 000137 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 01/17/01 556.11 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00163551 000137 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 01/17/01 37.45 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00163552 006661 VERIZON WIRELESS 01/17/01 1,985.83 MW OH
AP00163553 001401 VILIFY, LORI 01/17/01 106.00 MW OH
AP00163554 001103 VISTA PAINT 01/17/01 220.24 ~B~ OH
AP00163555 001329 VOLM, LISA 01/17/01 112.50 MW OH
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 01/17/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 9
WED, JAN 17, 2001, 5:51 PM --req: CGONZ~LE--leg: GL JL--loc: FIN~/qCE---job: 17723 #S043 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00163556 000478 WARREN AND CO, CARL 01/17/01 225.00 MW OH
AP00163557 005384 WAUSAU TILE INC 01/17/01 1,204.05 MW OH
AP00163558 000213 WI~XIE 01/17/01 1,894.52 MW OH
AP00163559 006727 WEST EKeD 01/17/01 11.96 MW OH
AP00163560 006637 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 01/17/01 4,620.63 MW OH
AP00163561 005658 X PECT FIRST AID ~ SAFETY 01/17/01 96.30 MW OH
AP00163562 000509 XEROX CORPORATION 01/17/01 29,930.50 MW OH
AP00163563 001124 YOUNG SALES CO 01/17/01 37.55 MW OH
GRAND TOTALS:
Total Void Machine Written 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 2
Total Void Hand Written 0.00 Number of Checks Processed! 0
Total Machine Written 794,371.47 Number of Checks Processed: 206
Total Hand Written 0.00 Number of Checks Processed= 0
Total Reversals 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 0
Total Cancelled Checks 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 0
G R A N D T O T A L 794,371.47
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 01/10/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 1
WED, J~/q 10, 2001, 5:00 PM --req: KFINCEER--leg: GL JL--loc: FINANCE---job: 16677 #S043 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check ~3nount Type subs Rel To Note
AP00163082 001230 100% SOCCER 01/10/01 107.75 MW OH
AP00163083 006451 A ~ A AUTOMOTIVE 01/10/01 147.72 MW OH
AP00t63084 000001 AA EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO INC 01/10/01 31.71 MW OH
AP00163085 006507 ~ PORTABLE RESTROOM CO 01/10/01 131.55 MW OH
AP00163086 006371 ABBEY EVENTS SERVICES 01/10/01 178.33 MW OH
AP00163087 002732 ABC LOCKSMITHS 01/10/01 706.29 MW OH
AP00163088 001220 ACCUKATE LAMINATED PRODUCTS I 01/10/01 59.00 MW OH
AP00163089 000013 ACTION BUSINESS MACHINES 01/10/01 326.03 MW OH
AP00163090 006409 ACTION FIRE PROTECTION 01/10/01 450.00 MW OH
AP00163091 006309 ADAMSON, RONALD 01/10/01 4,224.00 MW OH
AP00163092 000211 ADT SECURITY SERVICES INC 01/10/01 282.00 MW OH
AP00163093 005231 AEF SYSTEMS CONSULTING INC 01/10/01 1,485.00 MW OH
AP00163094 006226 ALLIED STORAGE CONTAINERS 01/10/01 2,941.58 MW OH
AP00163095 000973 ALP~AGR3~PHICS 01/10/01 63.42 MW OH
AP00163096 006172 ALTA LOMA C}{ARTER LINES 01/10/01 580.39 MW OH
AP00163097 006172 ALTA LOMA CH3~RTER LINES 01/10/01 396.79 MW OH
AP00163098 001221 AMERIGAS 01/10/01 60.01 MW OH
AP00163099 005206 AMS INC 01/10/01 3,289.08 MW OH
AP00163100 002693 AMTECE ELEVATOR SERVICES 01/10/01 843.75 MW OH
AP00163101 001217 ARISTO CARE INC 01/10/01 683.99 MW OH
AP00163102 001347 ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY 01/10/01 350.00 MW OH
AP00163103 001346 ARROYO POOLS INC 01/10/01 0.30 MW OH
AP00163104 004782 ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 01/10/01 475.00 MW OH
AP00163105 006255 ASSI SECURITY 01/10/01 135.00 MW OH
AP00163106 000402 AL~TO RESTORATORS 01/10/01 96.00 MW OH
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 01/10/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 2
WED, J~_~ 10, 2001, 5:00 PM --req: KFINCHER--leg: GL JL--loc: FINANCE---job: 16677 #S043 ..... pro~: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00163107 001135 AUTO SPECIALISTS 01/10/01 1,262.24 MW OH
AP00163108 004102 B ~ND K ELECTRIC WROLESALE 01/10/01 1,065.08 MW OH
AP00163109 006747 B AND R AUTO SERVICE 01/10/01 471.61 MW OH
AP00163110 004475 BAP~NES 3~ND NOBLE 01/10/01 59.87 MW OH
AP00163111 000033 BASELINE TRUE VALUE HARDWARE 01/10/01 25.93 MW OH
AP00163112 005522 BEAR STATE PUMP AND EQUIPMEN~f 01/10/01 296.08 MW OH
AP00163113 006748 BEARINGS ~ DRIVES 01/10/01 41.47 MW OH
AP00163114 001344 BEAUTIFUL THINGS, INC. 01/10/01 7.40 MW OH
AP00163115 002820 BER/qELL HYDRAULICS INC 01/10/01 149.59 MW OH
AP00163116 001351 BEST WESTERN HERITAGE INN 01/10/01 181.00 MW OH
AP00163117 001007 BETF~qY HOUSE PUBLISHERS 01/10/01 139.57 MW OH
AP00163118 001247 BIJ~KE PAPER CO INC 01/10/01 452.85 MW OH
AP00163119 004833 BOOKS ON TAPE INC 01/10/01 10.78 MW OH
AP00163120 006695 BOYLE ENGINEERING 01/10/01 32,000.63 MW OH
AP00163121 VOID.CONTINUVoid - Continued Stub 01/10/01 0.00 VM OH Void
AP00163122 004369 BRODART BOOKS 01/10/01 9,890.89 MW OH
AP00163123 001222 BROOKSTREET SECURITIES 01/10/01 78.92 MW OH
AP00163124 004410 BURNS INTERNATIONAL SECURITY 01/10/01 1,105.77 MW OH
AP00163125 001216 BURROWS, ROBERT 01/10/01 6.84 MW OH
AP00163126 001001 BURTRONICS BUSINESS SYSTEMS 01/10/01 32.47 MW OH
AP00163127 001001 BURTRONICS BUSINESS SYSTEMS 01/10/01 12.80 MW OH
AP00163128 000063 CALIFORNIA ASSOC PARK ~ REC 01/10/01 130.00 MW OB
AP00163129 021608 C~LPELR~ 01/10/01 195.00 MW OH
AP00163130 001223 CALSENSE 01/10/01 1,558.73 MW OH
AP00163131 001350 CAPPO CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 01/10/01 375.00 MW OB
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 01/10/01 C E E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 3
WED, J/~N 10, 2001, 5:00 PM --req: KFINCHER--leg: GL JL--loc: FINANCE---job: 16677 #5043 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00163132 000068 CENTRAL CITIES SIGNS INC 01/10/01 597.47 MW OH
AP00163133 000069 CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HS DISTRI 01/10/01 3,429.01 MW OH
AP00163134 001345 CHEVRON USA INC 201595 01/10/01 23.00 MW OH
AP00163135 001225 CEIANTI RESTAURj~NTE ITALIANO 01/10/01 15.21 MW OH
AP00163136 001059 CHILDS WORLD, THE 01/10/01 689.46 MW OH
AP00163137 001229 CHINA PAINT 01/10/01 71.33 MW OH
AP00163138 001337 CIESLIK, D~NIEL 01/10/01 56.00 MW OH
AP00163139 000074 CITY RE~FEALS 01/10/01 92.14 MW OH
AP00163140 006464 COASTAL BUILDING SERVICES INC 01/10/01 15,043.00 MW OH
AP00163141 001219 COASTLINE DEVELOPMENT INC 01/10/01 5.00 MW OH
AP00163142 002470 COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY 01/10/01 409.49 MW OH
AP00163143 000643 COMPLFTERLJ~ND 01/10/01 993.16 MW OH
AP00163144 001280 CONCEPT ENGINEERING GROUP 01/10/01 1,450.00 MW OH
AP00163145 006709 COPP CRUSHING, DAN 01/10/01 20.00 MW OH
AP00163146 001227 COUNTRY CLUTTER 01/10/01 20.00 MW OH
AP00163147 005349 CREATIVE MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS 01/10/01 1,260.00 MW OH
AP00163148 000085 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 01/10/01 9,795.70 MW OH
AP00163149 000604 CYBERCOM RESOURCES INC 01/10/01 12,250.00 MW OH
AP00163150 000239 D ]UqD H CONCRETE COMP/UqY 01/10/01 648.20 MW OH
AP00163151 000284 DAISY WHEEL RIBBON CO INC 01/10/01 3,283.70 MW OH
AP00163152 003698 DEALERS AUTO TRIM 01/10/01 250.00 MW OH
AP00163153 000107 DETCO 01/10/01 66.68 MW' OH
AP00163154 001353 DICK IUqD ASSOCIATES, RICHAPd3 01/10/01 1,000.00 MW OH
AP00163155 005809 DIETERICH POST COMP/~NY 01/10/01 444.40 MW OH
AP00163156 005744 DIRECTV 01/10/01 29.39 MW OH
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 01/10/01 C E E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 4
WED, JAN 10, 2001, 5:00 PM --req: KFINCHER--leg: GL JL--loc: FINANCE---job: 16677 #S043 ..... prog: CK200 .1.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00163157 004205 DYN~4IC GRAPEICS INC 01/10/01 58.95 MW OH
AP00163158 003364 EIGHTH AVENUE GRAPHICS 01/10/01 1,768.13 MW OH
AP00163159 006444 EL CHIC~NO 01/10/01 66.00 MW OH
AP00163160 005137 EMPIRE MOBILE HOME SERVICE 01/10/01 5,445.00 MW OH
AP00163161 090520 EMPLOYMENT SYSTEMS INC. 01/10/01 2,687.17 MW OH
AP00163162 002349 ESGIL CORPORATION 01/10/01 47,613.85 MW OH
AP00163163 006161 F~XON CO, TEE 01/10/01 215.39 MW OH
AP00163164 006556 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 01/10/01 6,406.70 MW OH
AP00163165 005892 FIRST PLACE TROPHIES 01/10/01 625.12 MW OH
AP00163166 003088 FIRST STOP MOTORSPORTS INC 01/10/01 525.00 MW OH
AP00163167 006685 FOOTHILL BEVERAGE COMPNAY 01/10/01 53.25 MW OH
AP00163168 041198 FORECAST GROUP LP,TME 01/10/01 46,000.00 MW OH
AP00163169 001144 FRAME ART 01/10/01 54.88 MW OH
AP00163170 001082 FR/UgKLIN COVEY CO 01/10/01 195.59 MW OH
AP00163171 006232 G~33ABOUT TOURS INC 01/10/01 896.40 MW OH
AP00163172 004540 GALE GROUP,THE 01/10/01 354.74 MW OH
AP00163173 001354 GMS AlgD ASSOCIATES 01/10/01 239.60 MW OH
AP00163174 003827 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 01/10/01 392.55 MW OH
AP00163175 001359 GUSTASON, KEITH 01/10/01 576.00 MW OH
AP00163176 001355 GWYNN, CRRIS 01/10/01 3,433.32 MW OH
AP00163177 005699 HARAL/kMBOS BEVERAGE COMP~/qY 01/10/01 979.61 MW OH
AP00163178 001349 HINOJOS, KERI 01/10/01 200.00 MW OH
AP00163179 004852 HOPKINS, LORI 01/10/01 500.00 MW OH CC
AP00163180 000161 EOYT LUMBER CO, S M 01/10/01 180.68 MW OH
AP00163181 001339 HUERTA, CECILIA 01/10/01 55.00 MW OH
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 01/10/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 5
WED, J~ 10, 2001, 5:00 PM --req: KFINCHER--leg: GL jL--loc: FINANCE---job: 16677 #S043 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00163182 001358 HYATT REGENCY HOTEL 01/10/01 155.00 MW OH
AP00163183 000495 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 01/10/01 10.51 MW OH
AP00163184 003276 ICI DULUX PAINT CENTERS 01/10/01 46.76 MW OH
AP00163185 004188 ID BURR 01/10/01 107.75 MW OH
AP00163186 001341 INDI~ WELLS,CITY OF 01/10/01 20.~0 ~F~ OH
AP00163187 001952 INI~ND EMPIRE STAGES LTD 01/10/01 2,156.00 MW OH
AP00163188 VOID.CONTINU Void - Continued Stub 01/10/01 0.00 VM OH Void
AP00163189 005682 INLj~ND INDUSTRIAL MEDICAL GRO 01/10/01 10,362.27 MW OH CC
AP00163190 002315 INLAND WHOLESALE NURSERY 01/10/01 394.65 MW OH
AP00163191 001348 JACOBI, GILBERT JR 01/10/01 30.00 MW OH
AP00163192 001015 JACOBS ASSOCIATES, JOHN 01/10/01 381.89 MW OH
AP00163193 001941 JACOBSEN DIVISION OF TEXTRON 01/10/01 6.09 MW OH
AP00163194 000612 JAESCHKE INC, C R 01/10/01 29.71 MW OH
AP00163195 001338 J~ESCO 01/10/01 838.52 MW OH
AP00163196 006667 K.E.C. ENGINEERING 01/10/01 172,278.90 MW OH
AP00163197 006677 KITSEN SPECIALTY CONTRACTING 01/10/01 6,894.00 MW OH
AP00163198 005295 KLAUS A/qD SONS 01/10/01 2,250.00 MW OH CC
AP00163199 004982 KOP3~NDA CONSTRUCTION 01/10/01 465.00 ~q OH
AP00163200 005545 L S A ASSOCIATES INC 01/10/01 3,003.49 MW OH
AP00163201 004217 L~DNER COATINGS 01/10/01 11,850.00 MW OH
AP00163202 000339 LJ~M, JACK 01/10/01 27.06 ~ OH
AP00163203 000195 I~NCE SOLL ~2qD LUNGHARD 01/10/01 9,585.29 ~q OH
AP00163204 001281 L~qDMARK PAVING 01/10/01 2,000.00 MW OH
AP00163205 032179 LApOINTE, J/~4IE 01/10/01 2,418.32 MW OH CC
AP00163206 000315 LEAGUE OF CALIF CITIES 01/10/01 395.00 MW OH
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 01/10/01 C N E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 6
WED, J~ 10, 2001, 5:00 PM --req: KFINCEER--leg: GL JL--loc: FINANCE---job: 16677 #8043 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00163207 000197 LEAGUE OF CALIFOR/qIA CITIES 01/10/01 14,392.00 NF~ OH
AP00163208 001342 LIBERTO, ALDO 01/10/01 66.88 MW OH
AP00163209 005884 LILBURN CORPORATION 01/10/01 7,749.00 NF~ OH
AP00163210 001455 LONGS DRUGS 01/10/01 54.69 MW OH
AP00163211 005662 LOS ANGELES COCA COI~A BTL CO 01/10/01 888.87 MW ON
AP00163212 001336 LOWER, DARLENE 01/10/01 251,00 MW OH
AP00163213 001062 M C I WORLDCOM 01/10/01 1,240.91 MW OH
AP00163214 006508 M D ELECTRIC 01/10/01 561.60 ~F~ OH CC
AP00163215 003987 M M A E C 01/10/01 50.00 MW OH
AP00163216 000549 ~L~RIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT IN 01/10/01 3,097.00 NF~ OH
AP00163217 004727 MARSH/~LL PLU~TBING 01/10/01 757.44 ~ OH CC
AP00163218 005375 ~4ASTER BUILDING SPECIALTIES 01/10/01 495,00 MW OH
AP00163219 002198 MICH3~ELS STORES INC 3019 01/10/01 33.42 MW OH
AP00163220 005852 MIDWEST TAPE 01/10/01 189.93 MW OH
AP00163221 004374 MOBILE STORAGE GROUP INC 01/10/01 135.34 ~F~ OH
AP00163222 001020 MOUNdrAIN VIEW GLASS ~ MIRRO 01/10/01 241.63 MW OH
AP00163223 000842 MOLrNTAIN VIEW S~L~LL ENG REPAI 01/10/01 200.23 MW ON
AP00163224 003316 MR TS 24HR TOWING 01/10/01 150.00 MW OH
AP00163225 002248 NAPA AUTO PARTS 01/10/01 136.95 NF~ OR
AP00163226 000744 NATIONAL DEFERRED 01/10/01 21,383.60 MW OR
AP001632E7 000593 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION 01/10/01 59.00 ~q OH
AP00163228 006166 NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION 01/10/01 85.00 N~q OH
AP00163229 006687 NATIONS REK~f 01/10/01 408.24 MW OH
AP00163230 VOID.CO~TrINUVoid - Continued Stub 01/10/01 0.00 VM OH Void
AP00163231 VOID.CObTTINU Void - Continued Stub 01/10/01 0,00 VM ON Void
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 01/10/01 C E E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 7
WED, J~/q 10, 2001, 5:00 PM --req: KFINCHER--ieg: GL JL--loc: FINA/qCE-~-job: 16677 ~S043 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00163232 000523 OFFICE DEPOT 01/10/01 6,519.31 MW OH
AP00163233 000365 OLD QUAKER PAINT COMP~NY 01/10/01 539.47 MW OH
AP00163234 000232 OMNITPJUqS 01/10/01 177.50 MW OE CC
AP00163235 004904 OTT, LAURA 01/10/01 92.50 ~F~ OH CC
AP00163236 000235 OWEN ELECTRIC 01/10/01 133.23 MW OH
AP00163237 001340 OXMOOR II 01/10/01 1,000.00 ~F~ OH
AP00163238 002921 P A P A 01/10/01 275.00 MW OH
AP00163239 001441 PACIFIC BELL 01/10/01 5,159.59 MW OH
AP00163240 000338 PACIFIC EQUIP E IRRIGATION 01/10/01 163.17 MW OH
AP00163241 001360 PACIFIC EYE INSTITUTE 01/10/01 320.00 MW OH
AP00163242 003716 PARMA 01/10/01 75.00 MW OH
AP00163243 000243 PARSONS BRINKER/{OFF QUADE & D 01/10/01 2,400.00 MW OH CC
AP00163244 006205 PETERMAN LUMBER 01/10/01 68.37
AP00163245 001343 PIBLE, RITA 01/10/01 200.00 MW OH
AP00163246 006148 PIRON, S~LAUlq 01/10/01 156.00 M]q OH CC
AP00163247 000693 POWERSTRIDE BATTERY CO INC 01/10/01 903.08 MW OH
AP00163248 000758 pR3~X_AIR DISTRIBUTION INC 01/10/01 1.00 ~ OH
AP00163249 001314 PRECINCT REPORTER 01/10/01 59.50 MW OH
AP00163250 004396 PROSHOT PRODUCTS 01/10/01 44.10 ~ OH
AP00163251 000583 PROTECTION SERVICE INDUSTRIES 01/10/01 193.07 MW OH
AP00163252 000065 PRLUDENTIAL OVER3~LL SUPPLY 01/10/01 7.41 MW OH
AP00163293 005899 QUALITY ONE ENGPj~VING 01/10/01 51.72 MW OH
AP00163254 000418 R M A GROUP 01/10/01 5,124.00 MW OH
AP00163295 000264 RALPHS GROCERY COMP~/qY 01/10/01 113.72 MW OH
AP00163256 004130 RBM LOCK ~ KEY SERVICE 01/10/01 32.32 MW OH
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 01/10/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 8
WED, JAN 10, 2001, 5:00 PM --req: KFINCHER--le~: GL JL--loc: FIN~/qCE---j ob: 16677 ~S043 ..... pro~: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00163257 000545 RED WING SHOE STORE 01/10/01 532.13 MW OH
AP00163258 000545 RED WING SHOE STORE 01/10/01 150.00 NFW OH
AP00163259 005665 REGULATION COMPLIANCE INC 01/10/01 600.00 MW OH
AP08163260 006218 RESOURCE NETWOPj<, THE 01/10/01 467.11 ~FW OH
AP00163261 005914 REXEL CALCON ELECTRICAL SUPPL 01/10/01 939.18 ~ OH
AP00163262 001296 RGS ENGINEERING GEOLOGY 01/10/01 800.00 ~5~ OR
AP00163263 000443 R~I CONSULTING 01/10/01 5,760.00 ~F~ OH
AP00163264 000276 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 01/10/01 325.07 MW OH
AP00163265 000626 ROBLES SR, P~AUL P 01/10/01 50.00 ~q OR
AP00163266 006673 ROTH STAFFING COMPAi~IES INC 01/10/01 597.96 MW OH
AP00163267 000281 RTIGI 01/10/01 1,189.56 MW OH
AP00163268 006577 RUPES HyDP3~ULICS 01/10/01 206.49 ~F~ OH
AP00163269 012142 SAFETY RESEARCH ASSOCIATES IN 01/10/01 47.85 MW OH
AP00163270 002585 SAMPLES, RYA/~ 01/10/01 100.00 MW OH
AP00t63271 005538 SAN ~qTONIO MATERIALS 01/10/01 132.82 ~ OH
AP00163272 000300 S~ BEP~N COL~qTY 01/10/01 1,925.00 ~FW OH
AP00163273 000581 S/~N BER/~ COUNTY 01/10/01 82,045.00 ~ OH
AP00163274 000132 S~2q DIEGO ROTARY BROOM CO INC 01/10/01 1,402.92 MW OH
AP00163275 005029 SB COUNTY FIRE DEPT 01/10/01 70.00 ~FW OH
AP00163276 006604 SCHNEIDER, DANIEL 01/10/01 34.78 MW OH
AP00163277 001829 S}~ARED TECRNOLOGY FAIRCHILD T 01/10/01 3,495.24 MW OH
AP00163278 004534 SIX FLAGS MAGIC MOL~qTAIN 01/10/01 506.00 ~q OH
Ap00163279 001327 SMART ~2qD FINAL 01/10/01 1,228.69 ~F~ OH
AP00163280 000317 SO CALIF EDISON CO 01/10/01 95,708.84 MW OH
AP00163281 012532 SORRELL, JODI 01/10/01 229.83 MW OH
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 01/10/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 9
WED, J3~N 10, 2001, 5:00 PM --req: KFINCHER--leg: GL JL--loc: FINANCE---job: 16677 #S043 ..... pro~: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00163282 VOID.CONTIN~3 Void - Continued Stub 01/10/01 0.00 VM OH Void
AP00163283 VOID.CONTINU Void - Continued Stub 01/10/01 0.00 VM OH Void
AP00163284 VOID.CONTIN~3 Void - Continued Stub 01/10/01 0.00 VM OH Void
AP00163285 001432 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 01/10/01 36,670.87 MW OH
AP00163286 003058 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 01/10/01 3,360.00 MW OH
AP00163287 005410 T A/qD D INSTALLATIONS 01/10/01 1,119.46 MW OH
Ap00163288 000836 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS 01/10/01 652.93 MW OH
AP00163289 001151 TECHNIC 01/10/01 245.00 MW OH
AP00163290 006642 TIDEMARK COMPUTERS SYSTEMS IN 01/10/01 580.23 MW OH
AP00163291 003388 TRUGREEN LANDCARE REGIONAL 01/10/01 5,474.35 MW OH
AP00163292 002737 U C REGENTS 01/10/01 100.00 MW OH
AP00163293 006004 UNITEK TECHNOLOGY INC 01/10/01 1,910.41 ~Sq OH
AP00163294 VOID.CON~fINU Void - Continued Stub 01/10/01 0.00 VM OH Void
AP00163295 000137 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 01/10/01 4,285.80 MW ON Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00163296 000213 WA2~IE 01/10/01 898.60 MW OH
AP00163297 004331 WEST END YWCA 01/10/01 659.00 MW ON
AP00163298 003080 WHITTIER FERTILIZER 01/10/01 1,260.68 MW OH
AP00163299 001361 WILLI~LMS BACK~OE SERVICE 01/10/01 1,000.00 MW ON
AP00163300 000348 ZEP ~qUFACTURING COMP/~NY 01/10/01 290.32 MW ON
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 01/10/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 10
WED, J~/q 10, 2001, 5:00 PM --req: KFINCHER--leg: GL JL--lOC: FINANCE---job: 16677 #S043 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note
GRAND TOTALS:
Total Void Machine Written 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 8
Total Void Hand Written 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 0
Total Machine Written 798,114.60 Number of Checks Processed: 211
Total Hand Written 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 0
Total Reversals 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 0
Total Cancelled Checks 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 0
G R A N D T O T A L 798,114.60
TO: Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control File Number: 372036
3737 Main Street Receipt Number: 1306818
Suite 900 Geographical Code: 3615
Riverside, CA 92501 Copies Mailed Date: November 20, 2000
(909)782-4400 Issued Date:
DISTRICT SERVING LOCATION: RIVERSIDE
First Owner: GLOBAL MANAGEMENT &DEVELOPMENT
Name of Business: 7 DAY MARKET
Location of Business: 12854 FOOTHILL BLVD
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91739
County: SAN BERNARDINO
Is premise inside city limits?
Mailing Address: 6993 NEW MEXICO DR
(If different from RIVERSIDE, CA 92506
premises address)
Type of license(s): 20
Transferor's license/name: 173657 /CIRCLE K STOR] Dropping Partner: Yes No
License Type Transaction Type Fee Type Master Dup Date Fee
20 OFF-SALE BEER AN[ PERSON TO PERSON TRANSF NA Y 0 11 / 20 / 00 $50.00
20 OFF-SALE BEER AN[ ANNUALFEE NA Y 0 11/20/00 $34.00
20 OFF-SALE BEER ANE STATE FINGERPRINTS NA N I I 1/20/00 $39.00
Total $I23.00
Have you ever been convicted of a felony? N o
Have you ever violated any provisions of .the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act, or regulations of the
Department pertaining to the Act? No
Explain any "Yes" answer to lhe above questions on an attachment which shall be deemed part of this application.
Applicant agrees (a) that any manager employed in an on-sale licensed premise will have all the
qualifications of a licensee, and (b) that he will not violate or cause or permit to be violated any of the
provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of SAN BERNARDINO Date: November 20, 2000
Under penalty of perjury, each person whose signature appears below, certifies and says: (I) Me is an applicant, or one of the applicants, or an
executive. officer of the applicant corporation, named in the foregoing application, duly authorized to make this application on its behalf; (2) that
he has read the foregoing and knows the contents thereof and that each of the above statements therein made are true: (3) that no person other
than the applicant or applicants has any direct or indirect interest in the applicanl or applicam's business to be conducted under the license(s) for
which this application is made; (4) that the transfer applicalion or proposed transfer is not made to satisfy the payment of a loan or to fulfill an
agreement entered into more than ninety (90) days preceding the day on which the transfer application is filed with the Department or to gain or
eslablish a preference to or for any creditor or transferor or to defraud or injure any creditor of transferor: (5) that the transfer application may
be withdrawn by either the applicant or Ihe licensee with no resulting liability to the Department.
Applicant Name(s) C'~ 'x-~,~A~.lica~ Signature(s)
GLOBAL MANAGEMENT &DEVELOPMENT -*'~'__ _ ~
ELMASSRY, Thorwar Sami/PRES/SEC/VP/TREAS -
ABG 211A & 227 Attached
Alcoholic Bevera.qe License Description:
Application: Type 20 (Off sale Beer and Wine - PACKAGE STORE)
Applicant: 7 Day Market
Address: 12854 Foothill Boulevard, APN: 227-221-27
Description:Person-to-person transfer, existing business (existing legal)
Site and Surroundin~ Zonin.q:
Site: Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan (Subarea 4) - Community
Commercial (CC)
North: same as site
West: same as site
East: same as site
South: Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan (Subarea 4) - Regional Related
Commercial (RRC)
RANC hO CUCA MONGA
[ ]
COHFIIJNITY SERVICES
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Kevin Mc.,Ardle, Community Services Director
DATE: February 7, 2001
SUBJECT': APPROVAL OF THE SELECTION OF AMS PLANNING AND
RESEARCH CORPORATION TO CONDUCT A PERFORMING ARTS
CENTER FEASIBILITY STUDY FUNDED BY FOREST CITY
DEVELOPMENT
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council approve the selection of AMS Planning and
Research Corporation of Petaluma, California to conduct a Performing Arts Center
Feasibility Study that will be funded by Forest City Development in an amount not to
exceed $42,500 for Phase 1 and $39,000 for Phase 2, if nedessary.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
The City and Redevelopment Agency are currently working with Forest City
Development and Lewis Investment Company, LLC for the development of an outdoor
retail shopping district in the eastern portion of the City. As part of those negotiations,
all parties have expressed a desire to explore the possibility of including a Performing
Arts Center as an entertainment component of the shopping district. In order to
determine the potential community and/or regional need for a Performing Arts Center, it
is necessary to conduct a professional feasibility study that will analyze demand,
evaluate market conditions, explore programming opportunities and consider financing
of both construction and operation. To this end, Forest City Development has agreed to
fund the cost of conducting the feasibility study and has asked the City to manage the
study.
Requests for Proposals were distributed in September, 2000 to qualified arts consulting
firms. The City received six proposals and the four most qualified firms were
interviewed on December 14 by representatives of the City and Forest City. As a result
of those interviews and follow up reference checks, AMS Planning and Research
Corporation was determined to be the most qualified to conduct the study.
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
PERFORMING ARTS STUDY
February 7, 2001
Page 2
Once the agreement is executed, AMS will begin work on Phase 1 of the study, which
will be the Market Analysis and Needs Assessment. This Phase will take approximately
eleven weeks and will culminate in a final report with recommendations on whether to
proceed, If development of a facility is recommended, all potential sites within the City
will be analyzed within the final report, including the proposed shopping district. If
justified, Phase 2 of the study will be a more in-depth Feasibility Analysis of the selected
alternatives. Phase 2 would also take about eleven weeks and would conclude with a
final report and presentation.
Attached is an excerpt of the AMS proposal that more specifically defines the scope of
work for the two possible phases.
Respected,
Kevin McArdle
Community Services Director
/km
Attachment
-2-
Proposal ' ~ Rancho Cucamonga Performing Arts Facility Feasibility Study
Scope of Work
The proposed scope of work for the Rancho Cucamonga Feasibility Study
encompasses the following major research components that will address the
issues identified in the RFP, plus some additional research needs the consulting
team believes are important in the determination of the potential demand for
facilities:
~ an analysis of the market potential for performing and cultural arts activities
including research into the current patronage of the arts in the region
" '=> a survey ofmarket area-based performing and visual arts organizations to
determine current programming levels and opportunities
=:> research into opportunities for touting performing arts events, commercial
and media-related programs, ran-outs and "residencies" by regional, state or
national companies, and potential uses by educational institutions
~ examinationofthe potential for conference-related programs, including
meetings of business, professional and trade associations, media-related and
industrial productions, broadcast and recording sessions
~ evaluation of existing and planned arts facilities in the region
~ a public survey of community interests and support for the project
~ comparable facility case studies
Based on the research findings, recommendations will be made regarding the
need for new performing and visual arts facilities, including projections of
demand, seating capacity(ies), technical, administrative and public support
spaces, and the physical and technical needs.
. If the project advances to the second phase, the consulting team will prepare
preliminary schematic plans, consh'uction cost estimates and operational and
financial forecasts, including governance, management structures, and revenue
and operating expense estimates. Alternative financial, staffing, management
and operating scenarios will be described and analyzed to determine the most
AMS Planning &Research 3
October 18, 2000
Proposal ~!~ Rancho Cucamonga Performing ,4rts Facility Feasibility Study
cost-effective scheme, including programming options, rentals, community
access, ancillary revenues, and so forth. The need for ongoing contributed
revenue, endowment, or other subsidy will be assessed and funding strategies
recommended, including public funding, contributions and "creative financing"
options.
PHASE 1: MARKET ANALYSIS AND NEEDS ASSESSMENT
A. Project Start-up
1. Background Research
AMS staffwill review previous planning efforts in the city, county and region.
In addition, municipal and county general and specific plans on relevant issues
such as urban redevelopment, preservation, tourism, and recreation, and any
other relevant plans being developed by educational, business or regional
agencies will be reviewed.
2. Key Leader Interviews
AMS consultants will conduct structured in-person interviews with a selection of
,, key individuals representing the arts, business, educational institutions, and city
and county govemment in order to generate information on related community
issues, visions for the cultural arts in Ranthe Cucamonga, and opinions of these
key "stakeholders" with respect to the proposed performing arts center.
B. Market Assessment
I. Market ,4nalysis
· ' i AMS will gather relevant data on the population and current arts audiences in
"' ....... ~ Rancho Cucamonga and the surrounding market area. Using AMS's exclusive
' ~2¢;~i:;:i:~;~ ~.=~../~. /lrts Vision® market analysis system, a population analysis will be conducted
..,-i ;~.:;~.:-,~. - ..-.... ~ based on current and projected demographics and psychegraphic (lifestyle) data.
':5~ i~~:;'ii~' i~!'!:i~! This analysis combines updated census demographic data, proprietary financial,
. ':' ". "' ,..i.
~:.'-::~-,,~;i~:;'.:'~*! consumer and leisure information and AMS's custom database of arts attenders
to provide insight into a market area with respect to their arts and cultural
.... !',i"':::)i.terests.
'~:~.,~I '~...~ Current demographic and lifestyle data for the trade area are gathered and
analyzed in a report combining narrative descriptions, tables and charts
describing and evaluating a wide range of variables such as age, education
income, leisure pursuits, family characteristics, etc. Maps documenting specific
demographic variables by ZIP Code are prepared to facilitate analysis and
identify target areas.
,4MS Planning &Research 4
October 18, 2000
Proposal ~ Rancho Cucamonga Performing Arts Facility Feasibility Study
A MicroVisionTM Lifestyle profile of the market area is computed. The
MicroVision segmentation system elassifies all households in the U.S. into one
of 50 unique market segments based on data that includes demographics, media
preferences, financial behaviors, and retail consumption patterns. The Lifestyle
Profile is compared to a national and state profile and an Arts Market Potential
Index computed and mapped for each ZIP Code in the market area. This analysis
enables an evaluation of the market potential for the area and identification of
high-potential geographies. The Arts Market Potential Index can be computed
for specific disciplines, including Musical Theater, Classical Music, Theater and
Museum attendance.
The final step of the Market Analysis is a calculation of the number of "high
propensity" households in the market area. This result is then compared and
contrasted to selected markets with similar population characteristics and the
overall market quality of the area documented.
2. Visitor and Convention
Potential
An important component of the Market Assessment will be an evaluation of the
potential for visitor and eonvention-goers attendance at arts events. AMS will
" assemble available information from local, regional and state sources on visitors
to Rancho Cucamonga and the surrounding region and their activities and
interests. Interviews with key persons representing local visitor-serving
businesses will be conducted to augment the data and obtain opinions regarding
potential audiences for performing arts activities.
3. Competitive Facilities
Assessment
In order to accurately determine the feasibility of a new performing and visual
arts facility, it is important to evaluate the competitive situation with respect to
other performance venues in the market area. AMS will assemble and evaluate
relevant data on performing arts facilities and live-event venues that serve the
area, including levels of use, marketing efforts, technical capabilities, etc. The
surveys conducted with arts organizations will also identify current facility use
and unmet needs.
Data to be gathered for the competitive facilities will include:
· Description of facilities and technical capabilities
· Current use/activities
· Current attendance, marketing efforts
· Political, structural, and organizational factors
· Operating costs, management and operations structures
· Economic impact and financial performance.
,4MS Planning & Research 5
October 18, 2000
Proposal ~ Rancho Cucamonga Perfot~ning Arts Facility Feasibility Study
C. Market Research
I. Public Survey
AMS will conduct a telephone survey of 300 randomly selected adults age 18+
to gain a base level of understanding of the public's experience with, and
perceptions of, area performing arts events and facilities, as well as to
understand regional competition and audience demand.
The survey will be conducted in a scientific manner so that results will be
representative of all adults in the market area, and will provide an accurate
measure -- within known margins of error -- of the perceptions and attitudes on
key issues related to a performing arts venue.
An interview protocol will be drafted by AMS and submitted to the client for
review and comment. Due to the high number of unlisted telephone numbers, a
'random digit dialing' method is used to identify eligible households to call.
Interview duration will be about 12 minutes.
The protocol will cover topics such as the following (list provided for discussion
only):
~' * Current/past arts attendance patterns (e.g., destination, frequency, size of
party, activities, etc.)
· Awareness and image/perception of cultural facilities and organizations
· Preference levels for types of cultural programs
· Attitudes about public funding for arts and cultural programs
· Willingness to pay, and preferences for alternative funding methods
· Level of support for the project, and likelihood of attendance at the proposed
facility
· Personal characteristics (i.e., demographics, lifestyles).
At the conclusion of the data gathering stage, AMS will prepare a detailed
statistical analysis of the survey results and present the data with graphs and
summary points.
AMS Planning & Research 6
October 18, 2000
Proposal ~ Rancho Cucamonga Performing Arts Facility Feasibility Study
D. Needs Assessment
1. Arts/Cultural
Organizations Survey
AMS will conduct research with local and regional performing arts and cultural
organizations to gather data on:
· Current audiences and programs
· Venues utilized
· Organizational data (financial, management)
,:::: :'.:'::.;,G...:'.;.,....~°.222 ::' -:
i · Needs for facilities (public events, offices, technical, support, etc.), technical
ili~i ' "" ~. .... il] assistance, funding, etc.
~':::
j j i:: :
: : ! i .~ ,: '. ! · Long-range projections.
................ The reseamh will include interviews with key representatives of each performing
arts organization that may be prospective users of the proposed facilities. A
detailed survey questionnaire is used to ensure completeness and comparability
of the data. If necessary, follow-up meetings and interviews will be conducted to
" verify and expand on the data. A critical aspect of the analysis of the survey will
be to assess the institutional capacity of prospective users; their ability to attract
audiences, financial situation, and production capabilities. Attention will be paid
to describing programming gaps and opportunities with respect to the potential
use of a performing arts center in Rancho Cueamonga.
2. Educational Institutions
AMS will conduct research into the potential for educational institutions to
become users of a performing arts venue. Interviews will be conducted with
representatives of public schools, and community colleges to ascertain the
potential interest in utilizing avenue for a range of programs.
3. Residencies and Touring Events
AMS will research the potential for resideneies (e.g., Repertory theater, Summer
festivals, Conservatory programs, etc.) of performing arts producing companies
to be housed at a theater. Interviews will be conducted with representatives of
selected major theater, music, opera, dance and festival presenting and
producing organizations in Southern Califomia and beyond (e.g., national
touring organizations) to evaluate their potential interests in bringing their
programs to a facility in Rancho Cucamonga. AMS's extensive contacts in the
industry will enable a comprehensive and realistic evaluation of the potential for
touring events.
.4MS Planning &Research 7
October 18, 2000
j7
Proposal ~]~ Rancho Cucamonga Performing Arts Facility Feasibility Study
4. Conferences and
Business Meetings
A cultural arts facility can accommodate many business functions as stand-alone
events or in conjunction with hotels and educational institutions. AMS will
research the potential for use of a performing arts center for conference,
convention, and business-related events (e.g., meetings, trade shows, product
introductions, etc.). The potential demand will be analyzed and a forecast of
utilization made for business and convention-related meetings, including types
of events, number, size, duration and facilities required.
On completion of the needs assessment, AMS will prepare detailed forecasts of
projected use, including the number of performances, types of programs, seating
capacity requirements, exhibits and educational activities.
E. Public Input
If desired, AMS will conduct facilitated focused meetings with the general
public to determine issues and concerns regarding options for development and
operation of a performing arts facility. The meeting would cover topics
including the following issues:
· Current cultural arts facility capabilities and shortcomings in the region
· Urban development and cultural ~acilities
· The needs of arts organizations
· Arts education facilities and programs
· Marketing needs and opportunities
· Minority participation
· Seating capacity and building type alternatives.
The meeting will assist in the identification of specific opportunities and
development of consensus with regard to performing and visual facilities for
Rancho Cueamonga.
F. Model Case Studies
AMS proposes to conduct comparative studies of relevant cultural arts facilities
in selected U.S. markets. In selecting sites and programs for study, attention
would be paid to size and composition of the market, similarity of facilities,
local cultural organizations, and other factors. Case studies would present
information on:
· Facilities and activities
· Background and Construction/Restoration History
· Capital financing
,4MS Planning &Research 8
October 18, 2000
Proposal ~ ~ Rancho Cucamonga Performing Arts Facility Feasibility Study
· Operating costs, management and operations structures
· Political, structural, and organizational factors
· Local and regional marketing efforts
· Economic impact and financial performance.
PHASE i RE~ORT.'*':AMS
~reeds ExisiDig Fabii[ties'
opportunities foi.
recommendat(ons for a ge?ie~aL~cOi~e~ d. f li?Ogi;arhniittg aiid fa~iii~ type; :iiM~; iit pr, esent these
~hdi}igs ~o CRy Aiahiiger, ~i~ ~Oit~i~il; aiid i~pp;.oprldi~ Cib) ~iaff ~b~S! ~ ~o~m ~o; di~6u3.Mon
and debate will be iiiChidec~ i~ thi} p~:~S~niaili~i ib aitoi~ Citp Ou eii taff i , iiie ~vhether the
project Should ~Onti~tUa to
AMS Planning &Research 9
October 18, 2000
Proposal ~ Rancho Cucamonga Performing Arts Facility Feasibility Study
PHASE 2 ~ FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS
G. Facility Configuration
Based on the research and discussion of the results from Phase I, a preliminary
functional program will be prepared for performing and visual arts facilities to
accommodate the needs of prospective users and audiences. Landry & Bogan,
theater consultants and LMN architects will apply their extensive performing
arts facility planning experience to this aspect of the study. Space options for
performance and related public assembly (business meetings, conventions,
media-related) activities, educational programs and administration will be
chosen that meet user needs, suit the capabilities of the community, economic
conditions, and market opportunities and constraints.
The functional program would describe the major spaces and technical
requirements for the building. The total building requirement would be estimated
and used as a basis for determining costs as described later in this proposal.
H. Site Considerations
The consulting team will determine if the building program can be
accommodated at the preferred site. If appropriate alternative sites will be
identified and evaluated. Site criteria and a process to analyze site options will
be developed with the city. Site review will include visual examination,
interviews with city planners, developers, realtors, and other reseamh into up to
four sites that could meet the requirements defined in the building program.
Among the criteria to be assessed for each site will be size, location, access,
zoning, neighborhood infrastructure, parking considerations, relation to existing
facilities and amenities, and capability for future expansion.
I. Project Cost Estimate
Following acceptance of the functional program, the total building requirement
would be calculated along with site and parking needs.
Based on the consulting team's extensive database of performing arts facilities
and research into local building costs and conditions, an estimate of construction
cost for the recommended facilities would be made. Costs for design fees,
furnishings, equipment, and owners' costs will be included. The impact on
construction cost related to site options will be documented.
AMS Planning &Research I0
October l& 2000
Proposa nancho C. camonga Performing raci i reasibi i S,.ay
J. Management and
Operating Estimates
Based on the market analysis, user research and review of comparable facilities,
management and operating models will be prepared for the facility options.
Tasks to be completed would include:
1. A projected activity profile for the building, including local, regional
and touring arts activities, conference and business events,
broadcast, recording and media-related activities, and arts education
programs.
2. A forecast schedule ofactivities and events which would take place
in the facilities, including estimates for growth and expansion.
3. Delineation of an appropriate organizational structure or stmctures.
4. Projection ofincome from operations, including ticket
sales/admissions, rentals, fees, leases, concessions and commissions.
Alternate fee structures for community non-profit, resident
companies and commercial users would be analyzed.
5. Opportunities for co-presenting, co~productions, residencies,
festivals and other programming would be assessed.
6. Forecast of revenues from ancillary activities such as food service,
special programs, parking, retail, broadcast, recording, etc would be
given.
7. Projection ofoperating expenses, inchding salaries and wages,
payroll costs, advertising, administration, maintenance and repairs,
utilities, presentation costs, equipment leases/rentals, insurance,
overhead and capital reserves.
8. Analysisofnetgain/loss.
A computer-based financial model will be prepared that will enable sensitivity
analysis of assumptions regarding capacity, attendance, utilization, management
structure, building format, rental fees, and other variables. AMS will work
closely with City staff to develop realistic scenarios for operation of the arts
center.
K. Funding Analysis
A financial analysis and forecast documenting the project's capital and annual
operating needs will be prepared to determine funding goals and strategies. AMS
AMS Planning &Research 11
October 18, 2000
ql
Proposal ~ Rancho
will evaluate opportunities for public and private financing of the proposed
cultural arts center. Research will be conducted into government-based
programs, foundations, private donations and othe/' strategies for financing the
development.
The consultants will e0nduet interviews with selected community leaders
including corporation and foundation executives who may be prospects for
significant gifts to the cultural arts center construction or operation. The
interviews will ascertain perceptions about the plans and test the community's
willingness to support a funding campaign.
L. Economic Impact
Assessment
AMS will prepare an analysis of the economic impact and benefits of the
proposed performing arts center. The following components will be analyzed:
· Direct operating expenditures on wages, services and goods
· Employment generated
· Impact of ancillary expenditures by audiences attending events at the
theater
· Estimated multiplier effect using regional estimators from state or
federal sources
· Economic impact arising from capital costs, construction wages,
services and materials
] [Z ] The basis for the analysis will combine data from the feasibility study research
~:~"~" ~Z...~7= and a review of economic impact studies conducted for similar projects across
the U.S. The economic impact resulting from direct, indirect and induced
~I~ ......... (ancillary) impact will be documented.
M. Facility Tour
AMS will identify comparable facilities and oversee a program of site visits for
community leaders. Data for each facility will be assembled and made available
to tour participants prior to the visit and a follow-up summary of findings
prepared.
of alterhati~ facih~ d~dopmeni scenarios, operating pPojecHons, funding
strategies and economi~ impacL ~MS will submit a draft report for review and
comment. ~ p?esehta~6~ ~iH be made tO the Cit~M~a~r and other
/IMS Planning &Research 12
October 18, 2000
RANC HO CUCAM ONGA
I
COMMUNITY SERVICES
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director
BY: Paula Pachon, Management Analyst II
DATE: February 7, 2001
SUBJECT: Approval of a Request for Waiver of Rental Fees for Use of the Epicenter
Stadium from the Quakes Community Foundation for a Youth Baseball Camp on
July 18-20, 2001.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council approve a request for waiver of rental fees for use of the
Epicenter Stadium from the Quakes Community Foundation for a Youth Baseball Camp on July
18-20, 2001.
BACKGROUND:
Staff has received a request from the Quakes Community Foundation for a waiver of fees for
use of the Epicenter Stadium for a Youth Baseball Camp on July 18-20, 2001.
The Camp would be open to boys and girls ages 6-14 and would run from 8:30 a.m.
(registration) until 12-noon on each of the three days. There would be a $90 registration fee per
child that includes for each participant activities including: introduction to offensive and
defensive fundamentals, base running and bunting, pitching and catching instruction along with
autograph and picture opportunities with Quakes players. Each child will also be given lunch
each day, a Quakes 2001 t-shirt and tickets to a future Quakes home game. The Quakes
Community Foundation has indicated to staff that they will allocate a limited number of
scholarships for children who are unable to participate due to the registration fee. Foundation
staff has indicated that the event will be marketed and advertised on a regional scale. Lastly, the
Quakes Community Foundation has informed staff that net proceeds from the Camp will be
donated to the Camp Fire Boys and Girls Club.
ANALYSIS:
In March 1999, City Council passed Resolution Number 99-049, A Resolution of the City
Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Adopting Facility Rental Fee Waiver and City
Service Charge Waiver Policies for the Epicenter. Staff has reviewed the request from the
CITY COUNCIL
APPROVAL OF REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF FEES FOR USE OF EPICENTER STADIUM FOR A YOUTH BASEBALL CAMP
FEBRUARY 7, 2001
PAGE 2
Quakes Community Foundation and finds that the proposed event meets the criteria and
standards outlined in the specified Resolution for a facility rental fee waiver but does not
meet the criteria for a waiver of direct city service charge. The table below outlines the
results of this analysis.
The requesting organization must conduct business in the City· Yes
The organization must be a non-profit organization with a City business license. Yes
The proposed event may not limit attendance on the basis of any discriminatory Yes
criteria, is not designed to induce membership into the organization or financial
support for the organization and is intended to appeal to all residents of the City.
The proposed event is not anticipated to cause significant damage to the facility, or Yes
All of the above criteria would have to be met. Yes
The proposed event must provide benefit to a City program or service. No
The proposed event would not subject the City to foreseeable liability. Yes
The proposed event will promote the City on a regional or greater scale. Yes
The event is intended to result in increased patronage to local businesses or involve No
numerous community organizations.
The event will offer City residents a unique community activity. No
lThe proposed event will not conflict with similar events. Yes
The proposed event is not designed as a profit making activity Yes
FISCAL IMPACT:
Should the City Council approve staffs recommendation of waiver of rental fees the fiscal
impact of this action would be as follows:
Base Rent $ 6,000.00
As specified in Resolution 99-049, waiver of rental fees would not waive or reduce the
following requirements: (1) refundable damage/security deposit and (2) comprehensive
public liability insurance. In addition, within thirty days of the event a financial report noting
gross revenue, expenditures and amount donated to Camp Fire Boys and Girls organization
shall be provided to the Community Services Department.
Community Services Director
I:tOOMMSERV~Council&Boards~OityOouncil~StaffReports IOOFYlhBaseballOamp2. 7. 0 1. do¢
ENCINEEI~tNC DI~PAI~Tr4ENT
DATE: February 7, 2001
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Michelle Dawson, Management Analyst III
Robert Lemon, Assistant Engineer
SUEIECT: Approval to Appropriate $280,000 in account number 1001-305-5300 and
$100,000 in account number 1001-305-5303 to supplement funding of
contract services for engineering plan check
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Coundl, by minute action, authorize appropriations in the
amount of $280,000 and $100,000 in account numbers 1001-305-5300 and 1001-305-
5303, respectively, to supplement the amounts currently budgeted for contract services for
engineering plan check. The appropriations will be funded from the development fee
reserve established in FY 2000/01.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
City Council authorized original appropriations of $230,000 and $50,000 for account
numbers 1001-305-5300 and 1001-305-5303, respectively, during the FY 2000/01 budget
process. Account 1001-305-5300 provides for consultant plan checking that is employed
when an increased number of development applications creates an overflow of plan check
work. Account 1001-305-5303 is utilized to employ consultants for expedited plan check
requests and is self-funded through the special engineering fees collected from applicants
requesting such expedited services.
The requested funds are required due to an increased number of development applications
requiring plan check, the employment of contract services on spatial projects, and
increased requests for expedited plan check. It is anticipated that the trends experienced
during the first half of the fiscal year will continue through the remainder of the fiscal year.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
AUTHORIZATION TO APPROPRIATE $280,000 ~N ACCOUNT 1001-305-5300 AND $100,000 IN
ACCOUNT 1001-305-5303
FEBRUARY 7, 2001
PAGE 2
Additional funding of consultant services is necessary to handle the foreseeable overflow
work and additional requests for expedited plan checks. The continued use of consultants
for these services will help ensure staff's ability to maintain its commitment to provide a
standard two-week turn-around on all non-expedited plan checks.
Respectfully Submitted,
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:rl
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ENGINEerING DEPAI~'I'~EN'r
StaffRepo
DATE: February 7, 2001
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Barrye R. Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer
SUBJECT': APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CiTY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONTINUING A
DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE (DBE) PROGRAM FOR
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution continuing a
Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Program and authorizing the City Manager
to approve the current program and annual updates.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
All agencies requesting federal funding are required to have a Disadvantaged Business
Enterprise (DBE) Program consistent with Federal Requirements in place in order to
obtain federal funds. In the past, this consisted of the City adopting the Caltrans
promulgated DBE goal to be applied to construction projects. In order for a contractor
to be awarded a federally funded contract, he had to have sufficient DBE (minority
owned, women owned, etc.) subcontractors performing work on the project to equal the
established goal percentage of the contract amount The new regulations require
agendes to develop a more comprehensive program. The City's program is based
upon the model program developed by Caltrans. The main components of the program
are summarized as follows:
· The City was required to develop a DBE goal specific to our geographical area.
San Bemardino Associated Governments (SANBAG) prepared a ragion wide
goal, which was used as the basis for our goal. The goal was determined by
dividing the number of DBE firms by the number of firms in general performing
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE (DBE) PROGRAM
February 7, 2001
Page 2
construction type work in the San Bernardino and Riverside Counties area. Our
current goal is 8%. The goal needs to be updated on an annual basis.
· The City has to develop a list of DBE contractors to be used to further define the
goal for future years.
· The City has to monitor contractor payments to DBE subcontractors.
· The City has to make an out reach to DBEs to make them aware of federally
funded project opportunities.
The City published a required program notice in the Daily Bulletin and four minodty
newspapers in November with a 30 day review pedod and 45 day response period,
which ended December 31, 2000. The City did not receive any comments on the
program.
Respectfully submitted,
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:dlw
Attachment
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA CONTINLrING A DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS
ENTERPRISE (DBE) PROGRAM FOR THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA
WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga desires to fully establish and implement a
federally mandated Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program (DBE) Program for federal
assisted programs within the City ofRancho Cucamonga; and
WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga's DBE Program will comply with the
regulations of the Department of Transportation, Title 49, Code of Federal Regulation, Part 23
(49 CFR 16); and
WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga's DBE Program establishes a policy to
ensure that local DBE's, as defined by 49 CFR 16, have an equal opportunity to participate on
federally assisted contracts within the City ofRancho Cucamonga; and
WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga's DBE Program shall annually re-establish
an overall goal, and a goal setting methodology, for attaining DBE participation on federal
assisted programs; and
WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has established a draft DBE Program and
annual overall DBE participation goal for federal assisted programs with the City of Rancho
Cucamonga; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga authorizes the City Manager to approve the Disadvantaged Business Enterprise
Program and Annual DBE Program updates.
RA NC HO C UCAMON GA
ENGINEERING DEPARTPIENT
Smf:fRe gt
DATE: January 17, 2001 . ·
TO: Mayor and members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Henry Murakoshi, Associate Engineer
S[IIiJFLT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR
6TM STREET AND HERMOSA AVENUE TRAFFIC SIGNAL CONSTRUCTION FOR
DR 99-46, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF 6TM STREET AND
HERMOSA AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY CABOT INDUSTRIAL PROPERTIES, L. P.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Improvement Agreement,
Improvement Security, and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
DR 99-75, located at the southwest corner of 6th Street and Hermosa Avenue, was approved by the
Planning Commission on March 22, 2000, for a development of a 401,304 square foot industrial building
on '17.93 acres of land in the General Industrial District. On May of land in the General Industrial 17,
2000, City Council approved Improvement Agreement, Security and ordered the annexation to
Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. I and 6.
The Developer, Cabot Industrial Properties, L.P., is submittin9 an agreement and security to guarantee
the construction of traffic signal in the following amounts:
Faithful Performance Bond $125,000.00
Labor and Material Bond: $ 62,500.00
Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office
City Engineer
WJO:HM:sc
Attachments
VICINITY MAP
NO SCALE
PI~OPOSED
6 TN STgEET
)'-
Tit ST.~::~T
4 TH STREET ~L~
.*i:~ CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
:i' ,. ~ COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
~"~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA
..; '..:~ ,.~-j
RESOLUTION NO. ~/" ~ / (Z
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT
SECURITY FOR CONSTRUCTION OF TRAFFIC SIGNAL FOR
DR 99-46
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for
its consideration an Improvement Agreement executed by Cabot Industrial Properties, L.P.
as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property
specifically described therein, and generally located on the southwest corner of 6t~ Street
and Hermosa Avenue; and
WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement
Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the
development of said real property referred to as DR 99-46; and
WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good
and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, H EREBY RESOLVES that said Improvement Agreement be and the same
is approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City and the
City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto.
RANCHO CUCA M ONGA
E~G~TEE~IN~ DEPAP~TMENT
S ffReport
DATE: February 7, 2001
T~ Mayor and members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Henry Murakoshi, Associate Engineer
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT
SECURITY AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6, FOR DR 00-08, LOCATED
ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF 4TM STREET AND SANTA ANITA
AVENUE, SUBMITrED BY VIC CHEN, A DEVELOPER
It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving
Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security, and ordering the annexation to
Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1
and 6 and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
DR 00-08, located at the northwest corner of 4th Street and Santa Anita Avenue, was
approved by the Planning Commission on July 12, 2000, for a development of a 81,960
square foot industrial warehouse building on 3.96 acres of land in the General Industrial
District.
The Developer, Vic Chen, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the
construction of the off-site improvements in the following amounts:
Faithful Performance Bond $14,800.00
Labor and Material Bond: $ 7,400.00
COpies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DR 00-08
February 7, 2001
Page 2
A letter of approval has been received from Cucamonga County Water District. The
Consent and Waiver to Annexation form signed by the Developer is on file in the City
Clerk's office.
Respecffully submitted,
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:HM:sc
Attachments
VICINITY MAP
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROV1NG
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY
FOR DR 00-08
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its
consideration an Improvement Agreement executed by Vic Chen as developer, for the improvement
of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally
located on the northwest comer of 4 Street and Santa Anita Avenue; and
WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement
Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of
said real property referred to as DR 00-08; and
WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and
sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES that said Improvement Agreement be and the same is
approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is
authorized to attest thereto.
RESOLUTION NO. O/' D2 D
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE
ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING
MAiNTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR DR 00-08
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City ofRancho Cucamonga, California, has previously
fonned a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of
1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said
special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B, Street
Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 (referred to
collectively as the "Maintenance Districts"); and
WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act
of 1972" authorize the armexation of additional territory to the Maintenance Districts; and
WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to
the Maintenance Districts and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in
amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto; and
WHEREAS, all the owners of property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the
Maintenance District have filed with the City Clerk their written consent to the proposed annexation
without notice and hearing or filing of and Engineer's Report.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all tree and correct.
SECTION2: That this legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the propertY as
shown in Exhibit "A" and the work program areas as describer in Exhibit "B" attached hereto to the
Maintenance District.
SECTION 3: That all future proceedings of the Maintenance District, including the levy of
all assessments, shall be applicable to the territory annexed hereunder.
EXHIEtlT "B"
WORK PROGRAM
For Project: DR 00-08
Number of Lamps
Slreet Lights 5800L 9500L 16,000L 22,000L 27,500L
SLD #1 4
SLD #6 1
Community Trail Turf Non-Turf Trees
Landscaping DGSF SF SF EA
L3B Per plan Per plan 15
*Existing items installed with original project
Assessment Units by District
Parcel Acres S 1 S6 L3B
3.9 g 4 4
Annexation Date: February 7, 2001
CERTIFICATE OF SUFFICIENCY
CONSENT AND WAIVER TO ANNEXATION
FOR DR 00-08
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B,
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
WILLIAM J. O'~qEIL, the undersigned, hereby certifies as follows:
That I am the duly CITY ENGINER of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA.
That on the 7th day of February, 2001, I reviewed a Consent and Waiver to Annexation
pertaining to the annexation of certain property to the Maintenance District, a copy of which is on
file in the Office of the City Clerk.
That I caused said Consent and Waiver to Annexation to be examined and my examination
revealed that said Consent and Waiver to Annexation has been signed by the owners of all of the
property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the Maintenance District.
That said Consent and Waiver to Annexation meets the requirements of Section 22608.1 of
the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California.
EXECUTED this 7th day of February, 2001, at Rancho Cucamonga, Caiifomia.
CI
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
T HE CITY OF
RANCI10 CUCA~ONGA
S' ffReport
DATE: February 7, 2001
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J, O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Willie Valbuena, Assistant Engineer
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF MAP, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT,
IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES, MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT
AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR TRACT MAP 16026,
LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF AMETHYST STREET, NORTH
OF VALLEY VIEW STREET, SUBMITTED BY AMETHYST ESTATES,
LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving
and accepting the Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities,
Monumentation Cash Deposit and ordering the annexation to Landscape
Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. I and 2
and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreements and to cause
said map to record.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
Tract Map 16026, located on the west side of Amethyst Street, north of Valley View
Street, in the Very Low Residential District (0-2 Dwelling Units per acre), was approved
by the Planning Commission on July 14, 1999 for the development of 18 single family
units on 11.3 acres of land.
The Developer, Amethyst Estates, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company, is
submitting an agreement and securities to guarantee the construction of the public
improvements in the following amounts:
Faithful Performance $571,000.00
Labor and Material $285,500.00
Monumentation Cash Bond $ 3,300.00
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
TRACT 16026
February 7, 2001
Page 2
Copies of the improvement agreement and securities are available in the City Clerk's
Office.
Respectfully Submitted,
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:VVV:sd
Attachment
ALMOND ST.
VALLEY VIEW ST.
HILLSIDE RD. ~< HILLSIDE: RD.
CITY OF rr~: V/G/N/TY iv/APM
RANCHO CUCAMONGA Trm,~.: 7'R~CF I~'0~
KN(]INm. k'IING DIVISION F3,.I4mlT:
~2
RESOLUTION NO. ~/' ~.Z /
A RESOLUTION OF THE GITY GOUNGIL OF THE GITY OF
RANGHO GUGAMONGA, GALIFORNIA, APPROVING
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT IMPROVEMENT
SECURITIES, MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT AND
TRAGT MAP NO. 16026
WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 16026, submitted by Amethyst Estates,
LLC a California Limited Liability Company, located on the west side of Amethyst Street,
north of Valley View Street, for the development of 18 single family units on 11.3 acres
of land, was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
on July 14, 1999, and is in compliance with the State Subdivision Map Act and Local
Ordinance No. 28 adopted pursuant to that Act; and
WHEREAS, Tract Map No. 16026 is the final map of the division of land
approved as shown on said Tentative Tract Map; and
WHEREAS, all the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the
final map by the City Council of said City have now been met by entry into an
Improvement Agreement guaranteed by acceptable Improvement Securities by
Amethyst Estates, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company, as developer.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreement and said
Improvement Securities submitted by said Developer be and the same are hereby
approved, and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on
behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest; and that the offers
for dedication and the final map delineating the same for said Tract Map No. 16026 is
hereby approved, and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County
Recorder to be filed for record.
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE
ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR TRACT 16026
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia, has
previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and
Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State
of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance
District No. 1, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance
District No. 2 (referred to collectively as the "Maintenance Districts"); and
WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting
Act of 1972, authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance Districts; and
WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation
resolutions, an assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority
protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within
the territory to be annexed; and
WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the 1972 Act related to the
annexation of territory to the Maintenance District, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State
of California ("Article XIIID") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization
to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the Maintenance Districts
on the territory proposed to be annexed to such districts; and
WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto and
incorporated herein by this reference have requested that such property (collectively, the
"Territory") be annexed to the Maintenance Districts in order to provide for the levy of annual
assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto
(the "Improvements"); and
WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly
executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A
Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the
"Consent and Waiver"); and
WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have
expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act to the
annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and have expressly consented to the
annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts; and
WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also
expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act and/or
Article XIIID applicable to the authorization to the levy the proposed annual assessment against
the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and
have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization of levy such proposed
annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and
RESOLUTION NO.
TRACT 16026
February 7, 2001 ·
Page 2
WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory
to the Maintenance Districts and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory
in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct.
SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that:
a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not
exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each
such parcel from the Improvements.
b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the
Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the
maintenance of the Improvement.
c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed
annual assessments.
SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the Territory to the
Maintenance Districts, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the
proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the
levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth
in Exhibit B.
SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the Maintenance Districts, including the levy of
all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory.
Exhibit A
Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property
To Be Annexed
The Owner of the Property is:
AMETHYST ESTATES, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
The legal description of the Property is:
LOT 11, BLOCK 9, CUCAMONGA HOMESTEAD ASSOCIATION, 1N THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
AS PER MAP RECORDED 1N BOOK 6 OF MAPS, PAGE 46, IN THE OFFICE OF THE
COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY.
EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION DEEDED TO THE SAN BEKNARDINO
COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT, IN THE DEED RECORDED MAY 13, 1980, AS
INSTRUMENT NO. 80-112578, OFFICIAL RECORDS.
The above-described parcels are shown on sheet A-2 attached herewith and by this reference
made a part hereof.
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 2
S.B,C.F, CD,
vALL_~Y" v/EI4/ -f, T
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NORT!!
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO d:, 7'
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ~
Exhibit B
To
Description of the District Improvements
Fiscal Year 2000/2001
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (GENERAL CITY):
Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (LMD #1) represents 33.93 acres of landscape area and
43.25 acres of parks which are located at various sites throughout the City. These sites are not
considered to be associated with any one particular area within the City, but rather benefit the
entire City on a broader scale. As such, the parcels within this district do not represent a distinct
district area as do the City's remaining LMD's. Typically parcels within this district have been
annexed upon development.
The various sites maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, paseos, street
trees, entry monuments, Community Trails and Parks. The 43.25 acres of parks consist of Bear
Gulch Park which is 5 acres, 20 acres of East and West Beryl Park, 5 acres of Old Town Park,
6.5 acres of Church Street Park, the Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center which consists of 175
acres and the newest park, Golden Oaks Park located on 6tn Street, west of Archibald.
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS):
Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (SLD #1) is used to fund the maintenance and/or
installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. The
facilities within this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the
City as a whole on an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance and/or
installation of the facilities is assigned to the City-wide district.
The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on
arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City.
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 (LOCAL STREETS):
Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 (SLD #2) is used to fund the maintenance and/or
installation of street lights and traffic signals located on local streets throughout the City but
excluding those areas already in a local maintenance district. Generally this area encompasses
the residential area of the City west of Haven Avenue. It has been determined that the facilities
in this district benefit this area of the City.
The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a
portion thereof) on local streets generally west of Haven Avenue.
Exhibit B (continued)
Proposed additions to Work Program (Fiscal Year 2001/2002)
For Project: Tract Map 16026
Number of Lamps
Street Lights 5800L 9500L 16,000L 22,000L 27,500L
SLD # 1
SLD #2 4
Community Trail Turf Non-Turf Trees
Landscaping DGSF SF SF EA
L1 6300 15
*Existing items installed with original project
Assessment Units by District
Parcel DU S1 S2 L1
1 18 18 lg 18
ANNEXATION DATE: February 7, 2001
Exhibit C
Proposed Annual Assessment
Fiscal Year 2000/2001
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (GENERAL CITY):
The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $92.21 for the fiscal year 2000/01. The following table
summarizes the assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (General City):
~/of Assessment # of Rate Per
Physical Units Assessment Assessment
Land Use Type Units Factor Units Unit Revenue
Single Parcel 7269 1.0 7269 $92.21 $670.274.49
Family
Multi-
Parcel 5952 0.5 2976 $92.21 $274,416.96
Family
TOTAL $944,691.45
The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (TR 16026) is:
18 dwelling units x 1 A.U. Factor x $92.21 Rate Per A.U. = $1,659.78 Annual Assessment
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS):
The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $17.77 for the fiscal year 2000/01. The following table
summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets):
# of # of Rate Per
Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment
Land Use Unit Type Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue
Single Parcel 16,956.00 1.00 16,956.00 $17.77 $301,310.00
Family
Multi- Parcel 6,257.00 1.00 6,257.00 $17.77 $111,190.00
Family
Commercial Acre 1999.52 2.00 1999.52 $17.77 $71,060.00
Total $483,560.00
The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (TR 16026) is:
18 dwelling units x 1 A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per A.U. = $319.86 Annual Assessment
Exhibit C (continued)
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 (LOCAL STREETS):
The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $39.97 for the fiscal year 2000/01. The following table
summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 (Local Streets):
# of # of Rate Per
Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment
Land Use Unit Type Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue
Single Parcel 6606 1.00 6606 $39.97 $264,042.00
Family
The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (TR 16026) is:
18 dwelling units x 1 A.U. Factor x $39.97 Rate Per A.U. = $719.46 Annual Assessment
T HE CITY OF
I~ANCItO CUCAI, IONGA
StaffRerx
DATE: January 3, 2001
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lain, AICP. City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Henry Murakoshi, Associate Engineer
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF MAP, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT,
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT
AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 AND STREET LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 3 FOR TRACT MAP NO.
16081, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF VICTORIA
PARK LANE AND DAY CREEK BOULEVARD
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Tract
Map Number 16081, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No.
2 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. I and 3, monumentation cash
deposit, and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement and to
cause said map to record.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
Tentative Tract Map No. 16081, located at the southwest corner of Victoria Place
and Day Creek Boulevard, was approved by the Planning Commission on November
21, 2000, for a residential subdivision of 101 single family lots on 20.9 acres of land
in the Low Medium Residential District of the Victoria Plan Community.
The Developer, Trimark Pacific-Day Creek LLC, is submitting an agreement and
security to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements in the following
amounts.
Faithful Performance Bond: $1,658,000
Labor and Material Bond: $ 829,000
Monumentation Cash Deposit $ 7,450.00
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
TRACT 16081
February 7, 2001
Page 2
Copies of the agreement and securities are available in the City Clerk's office.
Letters of approval have been received from the high school and elementary school
districts and Cucamonga County Water District. The Consent and Waiver to
Annexation form signed by the Developer is on file in the City Clerk's office
Respectfully Submitted,
· O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:HM:dlw
Attachments
VICINITY MAP
51LVERBFRRY
L~E ROAD
CHURCH 5TREET
VICTORIA
FOOTffiLL
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
~,, . COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
,4 STATE OF CALIFORNIA
..: ,- .~,~ 7~
RESOLUTION
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT
SECURITY AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT FOR
TRACT MAP NUMBER 16081
WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 16081, submitted by Trimark Pacific-Day Creek LLC,
located southwest comer of Victoria Park Lane and Day Creek Boulevard, being a division of 101
single family lots on 20.7 acres of land in the Residential District, was approved by the Planning
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on November 21, 2000, and is in compliance with
the State Subdivision Map Act and Local Ordinance No. 28 adopted pursuant to that Act; and
WHEREAS, Tract Map No. 16081 is the final map of the division offand approved as shown
on said Tentative Tract Map; and
WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the fmal map
by the City Council of said City have now been met by entry into an Improvement Agreement
guaranteed by acceptable Improvement Security by Trimark Pacific-Day Creek LLC as developer;
and
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreement, said Improvement Security submitted by
said developer be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said
Maintenance and Improvement Agreements on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the
City Clerk to attest; and that said Tentative Tract Map No. 16081 be and the same is hereby
approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for
record.
75
RESOLUTION NO. ~[ - ~) 2 t//
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDER1NG THE
ANNEXATION OF CERTA1N TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 AND STREET LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 3 FOR TRACT 16081
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City ofRancho Cucamonga, Califomia, has previously
formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of
1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said
special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 and
Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 (referred
to collectively as the "Maintenance Districts"); and
WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act
of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance Districts; and
WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation
resolutions, an assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority
protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the
territory to be annexed; and
WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the 1972 Act related to the annexation
of territory to the Maintenance District, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California
("Article XIIID'') establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy
assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the Maintenance Districts on the
territory proposed to be annexed to such districts; and
WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto and
incorporated herein by this reference have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory")
be annexed to the Maintenance Districts in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to
finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the
"Improvements"); and
WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed
forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance
District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and
Waiver"); and
WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly
waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act to the annexation of
the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and have expressly consented to the annexation of the
Tenitory to the Maintenance Districts; and
WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also
expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act and/or
Article XIIID applicable to the authorization to the levy the proposed annual assessment against the
Territory set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have
declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization of levy such proposed annual
assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and
RESOLUTION NO.
TRACT 16081
February 7, 2001
Page 2
WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to
the Maintenance Districts and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in
amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all tree and correct.
SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that:
a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not
exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such
parcel from the Improvements.
b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the
Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the
maintenance of the Improvement.
c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed
annual assessments.
SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the Territory to the
Maintenance Districts, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the
proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of
annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit B.
SECTION4: All future pruceedings ofthe Maintenance Districts, including the levy ofall
assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory.
77
EXHIBIT "B"
WORK PROGRAM
PROJECT: TRACT NO. 16081
STREET LIGHTS:
NUMBER OF LAMPS
Dist. 5800L 9500L 16,000L 22,000L 27,500L
S1 9 ......
S3 41 ............
LANDSCAPING:
Community
Equestrian
Trail Tuff Non-Turf Trees
Dist. D.G.S.F. S.F. S.F. Ea.
L2 --- 45,420 30,000 265
* Existing items installed with original project.
ASSESSMENT UNITS:
Assessment Units
By District
Parcel Acres S1 S3 L2
101 --- 42 42 42
Annexation Date: February 7, 2001
Form Date 11/16/94
Exhibit A
Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property
To Be Annexed
The Owner of the Property is:
TRIMARK PACIFIC HOMES, L.P.
The legal description of the Property is:
THOSE PORTIONS OF LOTS 9 AND 10 OF ORANGE EMPIRE ACRES, IN THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS
PER PLAT RECORDED 1N BOOK 20 OF MAPS, PAGE 1, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY,
LYING WESTERLY OF THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST ~ OF THE SOUTHWEST ¼ OF
SECTION 32, TOVv'NSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 6 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, AS
SHOWN ON THE RECORD OF SURVEY RECORDED IN BOOK 47, PAGES 68 THROUGH 75,
INCLUSIVE, RECORDS OF SURVEY, RECORDS OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID
COUNTY AND LYING EASTERLY OF A LINE THAT IS PARALLEL WITH AND 175.00
FEET WESTERLY OF SAID WEST LINE, AS SHOWN IN THAT CERTAIN CERTIFICATE OF
COMPLIANCE FOR LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT RECORDED AUGUST 18, 1983,
INSTRUMENT NO. 83-190179, OFFICIAL RECORDS.
EXCEPTING THEREFROM ALL THAT PORTION THEREOF CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, BY GRANT DEED RECORDED
JANUARY 22, 1998, AS INSTRUMENT NO. 19980021534, OFFICIAL RECORDS.
The above described parcels are shown on sheet A-2 attached herewith and by this reference
made a part hereof.
Exhibit B
Description of the District Improvements
Fiscal Year 2000/2001
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 (VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY)
Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (LMD #2) represents landscape sites throughout the Victoria
Planned Community. These sites arc associated with areas within Victoria and ad such any benefit
derived from the landscape installation can bc directly attributed to those parcels within that
community. Because of this, assessments required for this district arc charged to those parcels
within that planned community.
The sites maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, sweet trees, pascos,
community trails and parks. The 32.37 acres of parks in Victoria consist of Kenyon Park, Victoria
Groves Park, Vintage Park, Windrows Park and Ellcna Park.
STREET LIGHT MAINENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS)
Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (SLD # 1 ) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation
of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. The facilities within
this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the City as a whole on
an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance and/or installation of the
facilities is assigned to the City-wide district.
The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on
arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City.
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 (VICTORIA PLANNED
COMMUNITY)
Street Light Maintenance District No. 3 (SLD #3) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation
of street lights and traffic signals located within the Victoria Planned Community. Generally this
area encompasses the area of the City east of Deer Creek Channel, south of Highland Avenue, north
of Base Line Road, and west of Etiwanda Avenue. It has been determined that the facilities in this
district benefit the properties within this area of the City.
The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a
portion thereof) on local streets within the Victoria Planned Community.
Exhibit C
Proposed Annual Assessment
Fiscal Year 2000/2001
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 (VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY)
The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $422.00 for the fiscal year 2000/01. The following table
summarizes the assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (Victoria Planned
Community):
# of Rate Per
# of Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment
Land Use Type Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue
Single Parcel 4071 1.00 4071 $422.00 $1,717,960.00
Family
Multi- Unit 388 1.00 388 $422.00 $163,740.00
Family
Comm/lnd. Acre 24,676 2.00 49.352 $422.00 $20,830.00
Vacant Acre 405.13 0.25 101.2825 $422.00 $42,740.00
TOTAL $192,270.00
The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (Tract 16081) is:
101 parcels x 1 A.U. Factor x $422.00 Rate Per A.U. = $42,622 Annual Assessment
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS)
The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $17.77 for the fiscal year 2000/01. The following table
stmanarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets):
# of Rate Per
Physical # of Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment
Land Use Unit Type Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue
Single Parcel 16,956.00 1.00 16,956.00 $17.77 $301,310.00
Family
Multi- Parcel 6,257.00 1.00 6,257.00 $17.77 $111,190.00
Family
Commercial Acre 1999.52 2.00 1999.52 $17.77 $71,060.00
Total $483,560.00
The proposed Annual Assessment against the PropertY is: $17.77
101 Parcels x 1 A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per A.U. = $1,794.77 Annual Assessment
C-1
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 (VICTORIA PLANNED
COMMUNITY)
The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $47.15 for the fiscal year 2000/01. The following table
summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 3 (Victoria Planned
Community):
# of Rate Per
Physical # of Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment
Land 11se 1 ]nit Type Units I Jnit~ Factor 1 ]nits []nit Revenue
Single Parcel 4,071.00 1.00 4,071.00 $47.15 $191,948.00
Family
Multi- Unit 388.00 1.00 388.00 $47.15 $18,294.000
Family
Commercial Acre 78.79 2.00 157.58 $47.15 $7,430.00
Total $217,672.00
The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (TR 16081 ) is:
101 Parcels x 1 A.U. Factor x $47.15 Rate Per A.U. = $4,762.15 Annual Assessment
C-2
RANC HO CUCAMONGA
ENGINEEI~ING DEPARTMENT
S agReport
DATE: February 7, 2001
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer_?.:ce~<~
SUBJECT: ACCEPT THE BIDS RECEIVED AND AWARD AND AUTHORIZE THE
EXECUTION OF THE CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $110,290.54
($100,264.13 PLUS 10% CONTINGENCY) TO THE APPARENT LOW
BIDDER, PREMIER CONTRACTORS, FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF
THE CARNELIAN STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM
VINEYARD AVENUE TO 1550 FEET NORTH, TO BE FUNDED FROM
MEASURE I FUNDS, ACCOUNT NO. 1-176-303-5650/1043-176
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council accept the bids received and award and
authorize the execution of the contract in the amount of $110,290.54 ($1001264.13 plus
10% contingency) to the apparent low bidder, Premier Contractors, for the construction
of the Carnelian Street Pavement Rehabilitation from Vineyard Avenue to 1550 Feet
North, to be funded from Measure I funds, Account No. 1-176-303-5650/1043-176.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on January 9,
2001, for the subject project. The Engineer's estimate was $114,116.00. Staff has
reviewed all bids received and found them to be complete and in accordance with the
bid requirements with any irregularities to be inconsequential. Staff has completed the
required background investigation and finds all bidders to meet the requirements of the
bid documents.
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:CH
Attachment
CARNEI.IAN STREET PAVEMENT REH.aRILITATION
(FROM VINEYARD AV. TO ~1550' NORTH)
Project
, Site
.CITY 0F' RANCHO CUCAMONGA
VICINITY MAP ~,~
I
BID SUIVIFaARY FOR BID OPENING JANUARY 9, 2001 ApPARENTLOWBIDDER
ENGINEERS COST pREMIER ALL AMERICAN SILVIA
CARNELIAN STREET IMPROVEMENTS ESTIMATE CONTRACTORS ASPHALT CONSTRUCTION, INC,
UNIT BID UNIT UNIT UNIT
NO OTY UNIT )ESCRIPTION COST ~ AMOUNT COS~T AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMO.___~__~
1. I L""~' Clearin andGrubbin ine. SawcutandRemoval"""~'' $8,861.45 "~~ $14,000.00 $12~200.00 $12~
2"~ 91""~ SF Variable Cold Plane .C~-0.12' Deep_L_.__ __ __""' $4.97 $4,522.70 $0.70 $637.00 $2.00 $1 820.0C
3"'~' 580""~TONS ~'ariable Cold Plane~ $1.2~ $7,260.00 $1.00 ~ $1.3~ $7 840.80
4'~. 780 TONS Asphalt Rubber Hot Mix ~__ ~ $68.91 $53,749.80 $57.50 $44,850.00 $67.8"""'~ $52 884.00
5. 151 TONS Asphalt Cone. Inc. Pavement Pren. and Crack Seal $51.33 $7 750.83 $85.00 $12,835.00 $82.00 $12 382.00
$23.82 ~,525,80 $32.0__0 $6~080.00 $24.50 $4 655.00
6. 190 LF Crushed A~Base ~ _
7' 33""~ EA Curb and Gutter $16.67 $5,551.11 $31.00 $10323.00 $13.50 $4495.50
8"~' 2 EA Adl'ust Water Valve to Grade ' " $89.33' $178.66 $750.00 $1 500.00 $45.0""'~ $90.00
~ ,~m~mass* ~
9. 12 LS R lace Inductive Loo Detecton ~ $3 215.88 $200.00 $2 400.00 $220.0.__.___~0 $2 640.00
10"" ""r L"'~ S~ and Pavement Markers ~ ' ~ $3 814.16 ~ $3 300.0(3 $3370.00 $3 370.00
11"" "'i LS' Traffic Control __----- ~ $833.7__4 $833.7__4 $4 170.00 $4 170.0C $5 000.00 $5 000.00
'7""
~ "" $114116.00 $100264.13
BID SUM1VIARY FOR BID OPENING JANUARY 9, 2001 LAIRD
MATICH CONSTRUCTION CO., H & H GENERAL GENTRY BROTHERS,
CARNELIAN STREET IMPROVEMENTS CORPORATION INC. CONTRACTORS, INC. INC.
UNIT BID UNIT UNIT UNIT
lqO] QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT
l'. I L""'~ Clearing and Grubbin. ga.~nc. Sawcut and Removal '~13,551.00 ' $13 551.00 $14,171.30 $14 171.30 $17~000.00 $17,000.0C $23 200.00 $23,200.00
2'~. 910 SF Variable Cold Plane ~-0.12' Deep.)__ $1.20 $1 092.00 __ $1.25 $1,137.50 $1.20 $1 092.00 $1.25 $I 137.50
3'. 580""~ TON'-"-~ Variable Cold Plane ~ $1.5""""~ $8,712.00 $1.40 $a 131.20 _ $1.50 $8 712.00 $1.7(]
$73.50 $57~.330.0(] $75.00 $58,500.00 $65.00 $50,700.00 $70.00 $._.~54600.00
4. 78(] TONS A_jphalt Rubber Hot Mix A~_~
5'. 15""~ TON""~ Asphalt Cone. Inc. Pavement Prep. and Crack Sea $93.00 $14~043.0(] $50.00 $7 550.00 _ $90.00 $13 590.00 $80.00 $12,080.00
6---~ 19-----'~ L----~Crashed A~ase $29.0""""~ ~ $25.00 $4 750.00 $40.00 ~ $30.00
7'. 33""]1 E""'~Curb and Gutter ' $14.00 ~.662.0C __ $20.0"""~ $6,660.0(] $18.00 $5 994.00 $15.00 $4,995.0(]
8. 2 E""~ ~Water Valve to Grade $450.00 $900.0C $50.00 __$100.0(] $300.00 $600.00 $50.00 $100.0(]
9'. 12 L""~ Replace Inductive Loop Detectors $225.0"""'~ $.~2700.0'~ $250.0"""'~ ~ $220.0""""~ $2,640.00 $325.00 $3 900.0(]
10. I L'~ ~and Pavement Markers $3,500.00 ~ $3 250.00 $3 250.0C $3,700.00 $3 700.00 $3 500.00 $3 500.0C
11. I L"'~ Traffic Control $4,000.00 ~ $l0 000.00 $10,000.00 $6 000.00 $6 000.00 $2 000.00 $2 000.00
TOTAL $116~000.00 $117~250.00 $117~628.00 $121~086.10
I~ Page 1
BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING JANUARY 9, 2001
HOLLAND.LOWE
CARNELIAN STREET IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTION, INC.
UNIT BID CORRE{;rEV
NO] QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION · COST AMOUNT AMOUNT
1. LS Clearing and Grubbing~ inc. Sawcut and Removal ofAC $17~100.00 $17~100.00 $17~100.0C
2. 91C SF Variable Cold P|ane (0'-0.12' Deep) $4.55 $4~140.50 $4~140.50
3. 5808 TONS Variable Cold Plane (.12' Deep) · $1.10 $6,388.80 $6~388.80
4. 78C TONS Asphalt Rubber Hot Mix (ARHM) $66.50 $51~870.00 $51,870.00
5. 151 TONS Asphalt Cone. Inc. Pavement Prep. and Crack Seal $128.0g] $18~120.00 $19~328.00
6. 190 TONS Cn~shed Ag~reo~e BEe
7. 333 TONS Curb and Gutrer $17.2C $57727.60 $5~727.60
8. 2 LF Adiust Water Valve to Grade $200.0C . $400.00 $400.00
9. 12 EA Replace Inductive Loop Detectors $210.00 $2m520.00 $2~520.00
10. t EA Striping and Pavement Markers $3~490.00 $3,490.00 $3,490.00
11. 1 LS Traffic Control $21750.00 $2~750.00 $2~750.00
TOTAL ~ $122~006.911 $123~214.9~]
Page 2
~ANC hO C UCAMONGA
COHMIJNITY SERVICES
DATE: February 7, 2001
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Kevin , ' '
SUBJECT: ~ROV~ TO AW~ ~E ~ FOR ~E ~NG OF ~E
G~NE TO HO~DAY PB~NG FOR ~E ~OU~ ~ ~,517 FOR FOUR
I~UES.
RECOMMENDATION
That the Ci~ Council award the ~ntmct for the qua~edy printing of "The Grapevine"
magazine to Holiday Printing for the amount of $77,517.00. The ~ntmct is for a one (1)
year period and covem the printing of four (4) issues: Summer 2001, Fall 2001, Winter
2002 and Spring 2002. The contract is renewable each year for a total of three (3)
yearn.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
Each qua~er, Winter, Spring, Summer and Fall, the City of Rancho Cucamonga
publishes a 48-page brochure, "The Grapevine", which includes a City newsle~er and
recreation program schedule. Approximately 55,000 copies am printed, 48,000 of which
am direct mailed to City residents. City staff does most of the pro-press production in-
house including: collection of information, typeseffing, layout, graphics and photos. The
City ~ntmcts with a printer to prepare the final pro-press work, print and bind the
magazine and distribute it to the City and to a mailing se~ice, which ultimately delivem
"The Grapevine" to the Post Office.
Eve~ three yearn the City offera a competitive bid process for the printing of the
Grapevine. Although a formal bid process is scheduled eve~ throe yearn, printing
contracts am only awarded on an annual basis. Contracts and printer pedormance am
reviewed annually, and should the printer fail to meet the terms of the contract at any
time, a new ~mpetitive bid process will be unde~aken.
CITY COUNCIL
Award of Pdnting Contract for "[he Grapevine"
February 7, 2001
Page 2
In December 2000 the Community Services Department and the Purchasing Division
released the formal bid for the printing of the Grapevine. The following bids were
received:
VENDOR COST PER ISSUE ANNUAL COST
Holiday Printing $19,379.25 $ 77,517.00
Minutemen Press $20,400.00 $ 81,600.00
Faust Printing $27,610.00 $110,440.00
Star Kreative $25,000.00 $100,000.00
Holiday Printers, the low bidders, have been printing the Grapevine since 1994. The
quality of their work, their level of customer service and their ability to deliver the
product on time is outstanding. For these reasons, staff recommends awarding the
printing contract to Holiday Printing.
Fiscal Impact: The Summer 2001 issue is included in the Community Services
Department General Fund Budget for 2000/2001. The amount of the contract,
$77,517.00 is included Community Services General Fund (01) budget request for fiscal
year 2001/2002.
Community Services Director
cc: Dave Moore, Recreation Superintendent
Nettle Nielsen, Recreation Supervisor
Karen Silhanek, Community Services Technician
h\COMMSERV~Grapevine~Bid process~holidayreport2.7.01 ,doc
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Community Services Department
Contract Services Agreement
2000/2001 Printing of "The Grapevine"
This agreement is entered into the City of Rancho Cucamonga by and between the Community
Services Department, (hereinafter called CITY) and Holiday Printinq (hereinafter called
CONTRACTOR). Whereas, the CITY needs a professional printerforthe quarterly printing of'q'he
Grapevine" magazine, and whereas the CONTRACTOR has signified a willingness and is qualified
to undertake the required work in connection therewith, the following provisions shall govern this
contract.
1. TERMS: The terms of this agreement shall be that the CONTRACTOR shall provide printing
and bindery services on a quarterly basis for the City magazine, "The Grapevine", for the
following issues: Summer 2001, Fall 2001, Winter 2002 and Spring 2002. If the CITY and
CONTRACTOR agree and all contractual obligations are met on both sides, this contract may
be renewed a total of two (2) times.
2. PRINTING SPECIFICATIONS: The CONTRACTOR agrees to adhere to these specifications
and to furnish the following services to the City: 1 ) Quarterly printing of the magazine to include
four (4) issues at forty-eight (48 pages) each. 2) Paper Required: 50# Eureka recycled or equal,
3) UV ink on the four-color process pages including the cover, 4) Quantity: 53,000 copies per
issue, to be increased if needed. 5) Electronic pre-press services: convert disk to film,
shoot/scan, crop and place half tones, blueline, and color key. 6) One side of signature (4
pages) in four color, the remainder in two color (Black and one PMS color). 7) Complete bindery
service including stapling and boxing of issues. 8) Delivery to City specified mailing service and
to City Hall - Community Services Department Office.
3. CONDITIONS/ARRANGEMENTS: The CONTRACTOR is responsible for obtaining and
supplying all materials, supplies and equipment necessary to provide the service. The
CONTRACTOR is also responsible for the care of all City-owned or contracted equipment and
property. The CONTRACTOR is to provide and promote quality service and product and reflect
a positive image of the CITY. The CONTRACTOR agrees to adhere to the time lines and
publication schedule as presented by the CITY. The CONTRACTOR agrees to pick up computer
disks, photos, cover artwork and other items relating to the publication of each issue from City
Hall after notification from the CITY that the materials are ready. The CITY agrees to provide the
CONTRACTOR with a completed layout, fonts, artwork, photos and cover design for each issue.
4. COMPENSATION: The CONTRACTOR agrees to provide the CITY with a written invoice after
the completion of each issue. The CITY agrees to pay the CO NTRACTOR for service rendered,
in the amount of $19,379.25 for each 48- page issue. Total annual compensation of $77,517.00
based on the specifications outlined. CITY and CONTRACTOR agree to negotiate additional
costs that may be incurred if the specifications are changed.
5. CONTRACTOR: It is understood that the CONTRACTOR is not an agent or employee of the
City but is a self employed person/business and is therefore not eligible to lay claim to benefits
from Social Security, State Unemployment Insurance, or to those benefits reserved for
employees of the City.
6. REPORTINGOFINCOME:ltistheresponsibilityoftheCONTRACTORforpmpedyreportingall
monies earned as a result of work done for the CITY to the State and Federal Governments.
The CITY shall distribute Internal Revenue Form 1099 to the Federal Government describing
monies earned by the CONTRACTOR. The CONTRACTOR shall receive a copy for tax
purposes.
7. TERMINATION: The CITY shall reserve the right to terminate this contract at any time, upon
the failure of the CONTRACTOR to comply with the terms and intent of the agreement.
8. CONTRACTLENGTH:Thiscontractisforone(1)yearandincludesthefollowingfourissuesof
The Grapevine: Summer 2001, Fall 2001 Winter 2002 and Spring 2002.
9. ASSIGNMENTS: The CONTRACTOR shall not, under any circumstances, assign this contract
or its duties without proper authodzation from the CITY. Should such an authorization be
granted, the CONTRACTOR agrees to inform any subcontractor of all stipulations of this
agreement.
10. INDEMNIFICATION, HOLD HARMLESS AND DEFENSE: The CONTRACTOR hereby agrees
to indemnify, defend, save and hold harmless The City of Rancho Cucamonga, its directors,
officers, employees, and agents for any damage or injury to any person or property from any
cause whatsoever which may incur, due to the presence and/or activities of the CONTRACTOR
on or about premises owned and/or controlled by the CITY, except for a cause of injury or
damage which is the result of the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the CITY, its
employees or servants.
11. PREVIOUS AGREEMENT: Any and all existing agreements or renewals between the parties
hereto, covering the same subject matter, are hereby canceled and superseded by this
agreement and such prior arrangements shall have no further force or effect.
City of Rancho Cucamonga Contractor
William J. Alexander, Mayor Business Name
Date Owner
Address
Telephone
Signature Date
RANCHO CUCAM ONGA
I
COHHUNITY ~Et~VICE&
Staff Report
DATE: February 7, 2001
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF A CONTRACT BETVVEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA AND THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS OFFIGE AND APPROPRIATION OF
FUNDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $30,000 FOR THE TEEN CONNECTION
PROGRAM (FUND 264)
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council approve the attached contract with the Office of the San
Bemardino County Superintendent of Schools and appropriate funding in the amount of
$30,000 for the Teen Connection program.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
o
The Community Services Department has received an appropriation from the State of
California for $30,000 to fund after school programs for youth. The Office of the San
Bernardino County Superintendent of Schools is the agency responsible for disbursing
the funds.
The Department has worked with our local schools to develop the Teen Connection
program. This collaboration has previously been responsible for the successful College
Fair and Career Fair. The relationships we have developed have allowed us to expand
our programs and services to a new level with the Teen Connection Program.
Attachment #1 of the contract outlines the program elements of Teen Connection. The
program will help teens "connect" with their community. Staff will be stationed at each of
our three high schools one day per week for the entire school year for a minimum of
three hours to provide access to programs and services. This provides the program
CITY COUNCIL
FEBRUARY 7, 2001
APPROVAL OF TEEN CONNECTION PROGRAM CONTRACT
PAGE 2
maximum visibility and access to students. The City currently can offer these students a
number of ways to become involved in community service and meet their graduation
requirements. We will feature on-campus promotions and activities to draw attention to
the benefits of the program. The program will also feature annual awards and
scholarships for those students who best exemplify community service and spirit.
With our schools placing greater emphasis on community service and more stringent
graduation requirements, this program can increase opportunities for our youth to be
active participants in their community and be more prepared and competitive as they
approach their eady adulthood.
Respectfully submitted,
Kevin McArdle
Community Services Director
cc: Dave Moore, Recreation Superintendent
Patricia Meyer, Recreation Coordinator
I:\COMMSERV~Council&Boards~CityCouncil\StaffReports\TeenConnect2.7.01 .doc
OFFICE OF THE
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS
601 North E Street
San Bernardino, California 92410-3093
Agreement # 00/01-0189
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 26th day of October, 2000, by and between the
Office of the San Bemardino County Superintendent of Schools, hereinafter called "SUPERINTENDENT",
and City ofRancho Cucamonga, heminafier called "CITY",
WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, SUPERINTENDENT wishes to work in collaboration with CITY on development of an
After School At-Risk Youth Program; and
WHEREAS, SUPERINTENDENT has been selected by the State Department of Public Instruction
as the fiscal agent;
NOW THEREFORE, SUPERINTENDENT and CITY mutually agree as follows:
1. Responsibilities And Services To Be Provided By CITY
a. CITY will develop an After School At-Risk Youth Program in collaboration with
SUPERINTENDENT in accordance with the provisions of Subdivision Co) of Section 54 of
Chapter 330 of the Statutes of 1998 (SB 1564).
b. CITY will retain all books, documents, papers and records which are pertinent to this grant
for a period of five (5) years after final payment is made or until any audit conducted by the
State is closed, whichever comes later.
c. CITY will utilize aRached (Atlachment #1), After School At-Risk Youth Program for the
City of Rancho Cucamonga (undated) as the guide for execution and implementation of the
program, which by reference becomes part of this agreement.
d. CITY will submit a project completion report to SUPERINTENDENT within thirty (30)
days following the project year-end on June 30, 2001.
e. CITY will repay to State any funds due based on non-compliance with agreement or audit
findings.
2. Responsibilities And Services To Be Provided By The SUPERINTENDENT
a. SUPERINTENDENT shall pay to CITY an amount not to exceed Thirty Thousand and
no/100 Dollars ($30,000.00) based on an invoice fi-om CITY certifying completion of the
grant requirements by Jane 30, 2001.
b. SUPERINTENDENT will work in cooperation with CITY on After School At-Risk Youth
Program.
c. Within sixty (60) days following the close of the project year on June 30, 2001
SUPERINTENDENT will submit to California Department of Education a project
completion report which shall include a certification that funding granted was used in
accordance with grant requirements.
3. CITY'S Fee And Payment Thereof
a. The total amount paid under this agreement shall not exceed Thirty Thousand and
no/.100 Dollars ($30,000.00).
4. Duration Of Agreement
The term of this agreement shall be from July I, 1998, throuOh and including June 30, 200'1.
5. Mutual Hold Hannless
The parties hemto, and each of them, do hereby mutually agree to indemniht, defend, save
and hold harmless each other, and their respective officers, agents, servants and
employees, of and from any and all liability, claims, demands, debts, suits, actions and
causes of action, includin9 wronOful death and reasonable attorneys fees for the defense
thereof, arising out of or in any manner connected with the performance of any act or deed
under or pursuant to the terms and provisions of this Agreement by such indemnifyin0 party,
or its officers, agents, servants and employees.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this agreement on the day and year first above
written.
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS
date: LCt:3c,) Date:
Attachment #1
Contract between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Superintendent Schools of
San Bernardino County
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Teen Connection
Community Service and Personal Growth Opportunities for Teens
The City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Services Department is proud to
propose the Teen Connection, an exciting new program for teens, funded by a
grant from the State of California Department of Education, and partially
supported by the City.
The Teen Connection is based on an established community need and builds
upon an existing successful collaboration with our local schools. The funding will
allow the program to run from February 2001 - June 2002. The City is also
anticipating additional funding from the State to assist with operational expenses
in 2002.
Community Background
Currently over 9,000 students attend three high schools in Rancho Cucamonga
(Alta Loma, Rancho Cucamonga and Etiwanda High Schools). A fourth high
school is scheduled to open in 2002 and the teen population is expected to
continue to rise.
New statewide academic standards have refocused the direction of education. In
addition, students are increasingly being required to complete community service
hours to graduate. The City has been working with the schools to provide large-
scale programs that each school alone does not have the resources to do. This
includes two annual events, a College Fair and a Career Fair. The City has seen
a tremendous increase in the number of students calling to look for community
service involvement to meet graduation requirements.
The Teen Connection Program
The Community Services Department will collaborate with our local high schools
on this exceptional program, which will bring new opportunities to our students
including:
On-campus connection between Community Services and teens · Community Services staff on campus each week
· On-Campus promotional events
· Regular student newsletter
· Minimum of one major "campaign" at each campus each year
Opportunities for learning and personal growth through community
involvement.
· Community volunteer opportunities to meet school requirements for
community service hours
· Opportunities for apprenticeships and advanced training
· Special Incentive and recognition programs
· Annual Scholarships based on community involvement criteria
On-Campus Connection
Each high school will welcome our staff on to their campus on a regular basis.
Each campus will be staffed one day per week during lunch periods and after
school. Students may visit with the staff to arrange for one of the other services
being offered, such as an apprentice program or community service project.
Staff members will also regularly interact with campus faculty and staff and enlist
their assistance in the design on new programs and services. individual students
and campus clubs will also be key in the design and delivery of program
services.
Pedodic promotional or special events will be held at lunch periods throughout
the year. These would be determined through talks with faculty staff and students
to plan the most appropriate events.
A regular newsletter will be distributed in classrooms and at lunch periods. This
publication will be a short, but a fun way for the teens to learn about the services
available and other recreational opportunities offered by community services.
Each year at each campus the Teen Connection will sponsor a major campaign,
or program. An example would be to sponsor a Legacy of Hope" assembly for
Red Ribbon Week. These special programs would vary from school to school
and may take the format of an assembly or special event to raise awareness
about a particular issue.
Involvement Opportunities
Community involvement is a key component of our program. Teens who are
involved in their communities learn important skills for success later in life. The
Teen Connection will include varying levels of involvement depending upon the
needs of the teens.
Community Service Hour Fulfillment
Students seeking community services hours to fulfill graduation requirements will
have a wide variety of community service programs to choose from. The
Department hosts many major special events throughout the year that utilize
hundreds of volunteers. Sports and youth programs are also in need of
volunteers. If the student has a particular project in mind, our staff can help
facilitate the process.
Teen Apprenticeships
This is a more advanced level of training and commitment. Key programs would
be selected to give the teen a chance to really gain new skills. One example is
the City's new Mobile Recreation Program. Students in the apprenticeship
program would travel around the City after school with Community Services staff
bringing recreational opportunities to all areas of the city. Students will also be
recruited to help with the College and Career Fairs and other programs.
Incentives, Rewards and Scholarships
Our on-campus connection will allow us to directly interact with the teens on a
regular basis and establish meaningful relationships with groups, individuals and
the schools. We plan to develop a three-step approach to encourage students to
utilize our services. Incentives will be an important first step in providing service.
Teens will know upfront what the advantages to such a program are. They may
receive special shirts, gift certificates or other types of incentives for signing up.
Once their commitment will be completed, they will be rewarded with additional
certificates and recognition. Finally, the program will award one cash scholarship
at each school each year. The criteria for the award will be based not on
academic or school involvement, but on service to the community through
volunteer projects.
The City will be combining present resources of staff and programs with support
from this grant to bring truly unique and new opportunities for our youth. By
reaching them at the school level, and drawing them out into the community after
school, the student and community will benefit. The City will continue to work with
the schools to develop workshops, study training programs and other services to
ensure the success of our teens.
Teen Connection Budget
The initial program duration is from February 2001 - June 2002, covering two
fiscal years. This budget represents the entire program budget of $30,000.
Grant Revenue $30,000 $19,670
(carryover balance)
Projected Expenditures
Personnel
Account # 12644065010
Program Specialist 3,100 8,325
(35 hours per week. Grant pays 15
hours per week. 20 hours per week,
existing City funding)
Benefits 280 750
Maintenance/Operations
Account # 12644065200
Promotional Events 1,200 2,000
Incentives/Rewards 1,000 2,000
Scholarships 1,000 2,500
Campaigns/Assemblies 3,000 3,000
Newsletter 500 750
Miscellaneous 250 345
Total Expenditures $10,330 $19,670
(carry over remaining
balance to next fiscal year)
Expenditure Summary
Fiscal Year 2000/2001 $10,330
Fiscal Year 2001/2002 $19,670
Total Expenditures $30,000.00
ENGINEERING DEPARTSlENT
staffR
DATE: February 7, 2001
TO:. Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. OqNeil, City Engineer
BY: Linda R. Beck, Junior Engineer
5XrBJFLq~. RELEASE REMAINING BONDS ON PARCEL MAP 14022, TRACT 13351,
TRACT 13303, TRACT 13303-2
RECOMnMENDATION:
The required improvements for Parcel Map 14022, Tract 13351, Tract 13303, Tract 13303-2
have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that the City Council
accept said improvements, authorize the City Clerk to release the remaining bonds.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
As a condition of approval of completion of Parcel Map 14022, Tract 13351, Tract 13303, Tract
13303-2, the applicant was required to complete street improvements. The improvements have
been completed, the Parcel Map and Tracts have been accepted by the City and it is
recommended that City Council release the existing Faithful Performance Bonds, Labor and
Material Bonds and Maintenance Bonds.
Developer: Lewis Homes
P.O. Box 607
Upland, CA 91764
Release:
Faithful Performance Bond Parcel Map 14022 4156765 $727,020.00
Maintenance Bond Parcel Map 14022 4156785 $ 72,203.00
Maintenance Bond Tract 13351 2237155 $ 5,160.00
Faithful Performance Bond Tract 13303 1450495 $ 11,300.00
Faithful Performance Bond Tract 13303-2 1450505 $ 21,600.00
Labor and Material Bond Tract 13303 2057995 $ 56,500.00
Labor and Material Bond Tract 13303-2 2058005 $ 108,000.00
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
February 7, 2001
Page 2
Respectfully submitted,
William~j.~,O,Neil~j~
City Engineer
WIO:LRB:Is
HILLSIDE
'
WILSON
BANYAN N
HIGHLAND:
UPLAND
BASELINE FONTANA
1~.022
THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
4ih
ONTARIO
RANC h O CU CAMONGA
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
S Repo
DATE: February 7, 2001
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. OqNeil, City Engineer
BY: Linda R. Beek, Junior Engineer
SUBJECT: RELEASE LABOR AND MATERIAL BOND, LETTER OF CREDIT NO.
SB995039 AND ACCEPT AS LABOR AND MATERIAL BOND, LETTER OF
CREDIT NO. RP210005 FOR IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 13812,
SUBMITTED BY WEALTH V. LLC, LOCATED WEST OF ETIWANDA
AVENUE, BETWEEN SUMMIT AND HIGHLAND
RECOMMENDATION
Authorize the City Clerk to release Letter of Credit No. SB995039 held as Labor and Material
Bond for improvements for Tract 13812, and accept Letter of Credit No. RP210005 as Material
and Labor Bond for Tract 13812.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
As a condition of approval of completion of Tract 13812, located west of Etiwanda Avenue,
between summit and highland, the applicant was required to complete street improvements. The
improvements are 90% completed and the developer has request a reduction in his bonds, it is
recommended that City Council release the existing Labor and Material Bond and accept the
reduced Labor and Material Bond.
Developer: Wealth V. LLC
1028 Westminster Avenue
Alhambra, CA 91803
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
TRACT 13812 - WEALTH V LLC
February 7, 2001
Page 2
Faithful Performance Bond Letter of Credit No. SB995039 $1,858,500.00
Faithful Performance Bond Letter of Credit No. RP210005 $ 130,000.00
Respectfully submitted,
ON
William J. ' eil
City Engineer
WJO:LRB:Is
CITY OF ,.~, ITEM: Tract 13812
RANCH0 CUCAMONGA TrrL~ ~cinlty Map
ENGINEERING DIVISION EXHIRIT: "A"
/~)~/
RANC HO CUCAMONGA
~i~!oc~ ~i~i!~i~l~:~!l/~!~!1
ENCINEERINC DEPARTMENT
DATE: February 7, 2001
T~. Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Linda R. Beek, Junior Engineer
SUBJECT: ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE
BOND, ACCEPT A MAINTENANCE BOND AND FILE A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION FOR IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 14380, SUBMITTED BY
GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORPORATION, A NEW YORK
CORPORATION, LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF ETIWANDA
AND WILSON AVENUES
RECOMMENDATION
The required improvements for Tract 14380, have been completed in an acceptable manner, and
it is recommended that the City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer
to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance
Bond and accept a Maintenance Bond.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
As a condition of approval of completion of Tract 14380, located on the Northwest Comer of E~wanda and
Wilson Avenues, the applicant was required to complete street improvements. The improvements have
been completed and it is recommended that City Cotmcil release the existing Faithful Performance Bonds
and accept the Maintenance Bonds.
Developer: General Electric Capital Corporation
A New York Corporation
400 North Tustin Avenue
Santa Ana, CA 92705
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
TRACT 14380 - GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORPORATION
February 7, 2001
Page 2
Faithful Performance Bond SD00076261 $103,000.00
SD00076264 $ 89,500.00
SD00076263 $ 85,400.00
SD00076266 $ 38,400.00
SD00076260 $ 254,500.00
Maintenance Bond SD00076261 $ 10,300.00
SD00076264 $ 8,950.00
SD00076263 $ 8,540.00
SD00076266 $ 3,840.00
SD00076260 $ 50,900.00
ResPectfu~mZ~/6(;X
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:LRB:ls
Ci'l'y of Rancho Cucamongo/
f TR 14380
City Streets
L~_
.---.+._. , city
S i Meier Streets
' ~ I
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 14380 AND
AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION
FOR THE WORK
WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tract 14380 have been
completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and
WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work is
complete.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby
resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a
Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bemardino County.
RANC h O CU CAMONGA
~!~!!~!~ ~ ~,~.~!~i~!i~,<,~i~!i~ii~:+"(~!
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Staff Report
DATE February 7, 2001
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Jerry A. Dyer, Project Manager
Richard Oaxaca, Engineering Technician
SUBJECT: ACCEPT THE BANYAN STREET AT FREDERICKSBURG AVENUE TRAFFIC
SIGNAL AND WIDENING IMPROVEMENTS, CONTRACT NO. 00-051 AS
COMPLETE, RELEASE THE BONDS, ACCEPT A MAINTENANCE BOND AND
AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION AND
APPROVE THE FINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $168,790.66
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council accept The Banyan Street at Fredericksburg Avenue Traffic
Signal and Widening Improvements, Contract No. 00-051, as complete, authorize the City Engineer
to file a Notice of Completion, accept a Maintenance Bond, release the Faithful Performance Bond,
authorize the release of the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of $155,834.00 six months
after the recordation of said notice if no claims have been received and authorize the release of the
retention in the amount of $16,879.07, 35 days after acceptance. Also, approve the final contract
amount of $168,790.66.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications
and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The final contract amount, based on project
documentation, is $168,790.66, which included three contract change orders resulting in a change
in the original contract amount of 8.31%. The original amount approved by Council was
$171,417.40 ($155,834.00 plus 10%).
Respectfully submitted,
Wi Ili~m~
City Engineer
WJO:JAD/RO:Is
Attachments
RESOLUTION NO. 0/' ~- ~'
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE
BANYAN STREET AT FREDERICKSBURG AVENUE
TRAFFIC SIGNAL AND WIDENING IMPROVEMENTS,
CONTRACT NO. 00-051 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING
OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
WHEREAS, the Banyan Street at Fredericksburg Avenue Traffic Signal and
Widening Improvements, Contract No. 00-051, has been completed to the satisfaction
of the City Engineer; and
WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifiJing the work
complete.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby
resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign
and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County.
ii0
EXHIBIT "A"
Banyan SU~et
PROJECT I
LIMITS
N ,T.S.
BANYAN STREET AT FREDE!UCKSBUR; AVENUE
TRAFFIC SIGNAL AND eDENIN6 IMPROVEMENTS
VICINITY MAP
~//
THE CITY 0 F
I~ANCIIO CUCAMONCA
S Repm
DATE: February 7, 2001
T~. Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer
SUBJF. L~. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 99-50 - BARRY VANTIGER - Appeal of the
Planning Commission's decision to require the construction of storm drainage
improvements in Foothill Boulevard t~om the existing terminus near Cornwall
Avenue to Etiwanda Avenue for the development of a service station with
convenience market, driv~thru fast food service and a drive-thru self-service car
wash on two acres of land located on the Northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard
and Etiwanda Avenue in the Community Commercial District (Subarea 4) of the
Foothill BouleVard Specific Plan - APN: 1100-161-002
RECOMMENDATION:
If the City Council concurs with the applicant's request for a continuance to his appeal, it would
be appropriate to continue the item to February 21, 2001, Staff will re-advertise for the
continuance date.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
On December 13, 2000, the Planning Commission unanimously approved Conditional Use Permit
99-50. As part of the approval of the Conditional Use Permit, conditions consistent with City
Standards and Policies, including the EtiwandaJSan Sevaine Area Drainage Policy, were imposed.
The required storm drain improvements are listed on the approved Planning Commission Resolution
No. 00-139, attached "Exhibit C", under Environmental Mitigation - Water (page 5).
The developer filed a timely appeal of the Conditional Use Permit because of a concern with item
1.a of the referenced Resolution, the construction of offsite storm drain facilities in Foothill
Boulevard. Attached as Exhibit "A" is a copy of his appeal letter, dated December 21, 2000.
Since then the applicant has had further discussions with his engineer and with City staff. The
applicant has filed a second request letter in regards to his appeal, dated January 23, 2001 and
attached as Exhibit "B", asking that his appeal heating be continued to February 21, 2001. This
llZ
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
CUP 99-50 - Barry Vantiger
February 7, 2001
Page 2
allows him time to examine additional alternatives to the construction of the Foothill Boulevard
drainage facilities per the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Drainage Policy.
This appeal item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper,
the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of
the project site. If City Council continues this item, staff will re-advertise as required for the
continued public hearing.
Respectfully Submitted,
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:PV:dlw
Attachments: Appeal Request Letter (Exhibit "A")
Continuance Request Letter (Exhibit "B ")
Planning Resolution No. 00-139 (Exhibit "C")
Vicinity Map (Exhibit "D")
DECEMBER 21, 2000
CITY CLERK
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
PO BOX 807
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91729
SUBJECT: APPEAL TO C1TY COUNCIL
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT & CONDITIONAL USE pERMIT
99-50-VANTIGER
PROPERTY: NEC FOOTHILL BLVD. & ETIWANDA AVE-
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 17.02.080.B OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL
CODE, THIS LETTER SERVES AS WRITTEN NOTICE OF APPEAL TO CITY COUNCIL
OF THE DECEMBER 13, 2000 DECISION BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR THE
ABOVE MENTIONED SUBJECT AND PROPERTY.
SPECIFICALLY, 1 WOULD LIKE AN OPPORTUNITY TO DISCUSS AND PRESENT TO
THE COUNCIL AN ALTERNATIVE TO THE ENGINEERING DIVISION REQUIREMENT
TO "CONSTRUCT ETIWANDA/SAN SEVAINE AREA 9 MASTER AND/OR LOCAL
STORM DRAIN FACILITIES IN FOOTHILL BOULEVARD FROM THE EXISTING
TERMINUS NEAR CORNWALL AVENUE TO ETIWANDA AVENUE.7'
SHOULD ANY ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION OR INFORMATION BE REQUIRED AT
THIS TIME IN ORDER TO INITIATE THE APPEAL PROCESS, PLEASE CONTACT ME AS
SOON AS POSSIBLE AT THE NUMBER BELOW.
RESPECTFULLY,
BARRY VANTIGER
Rancho Cucamonga Travel Center, LLC
,29 .. E..,,d A.., o.,a.o cA .,'2 XI4tBVI' A
(909) 983-4321 Fax (909) 983-2737 /
gemreel pharmacy Repurchase Trust
129 N. Euclid Ave. Ontario, CA 91762
(909) 988-5805 Fax (909) 983-2737
January 23, 2001 t1~ [L
Brent Le Count, Associate Planner
Planning Department eXIt
City ofRancho Cucamonga
10500 Civic Center Drive
Raneho Cucamonga CA 91729
Re: Request of Continuance
Ref: Appeal to a portion of CUP 99-50
Property located at the N/E Corner of Etiwanda Ave. and Foothill
Blvd., a.k.a. 12912 Foothill Blvd.
Dear Mr. Le Count:
This letter is to respectfully request a continuance of the Public Hearing on the
appeal of CUp 99-50 that is scheduled for the City Council meeting of February 7,
2001. I would like this item continued to the scheduled City Council meetings of
February 21, 2001 in order to provide sufficient time to examine and evaluate
additional mitigation alternatives.
Thank you in advance for your assistance in this matter and should you have any
questions or require anything additional at this time, please feel free to give me a
call.
RESOLUTION NO. 00-139
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT 99-50, A REQUEST TO DEVELOP A 5,130 SQUARE FOOT
SERVICE STATION WITH CONVENIENCE MARKET, DRIVE-THRU FAST
FOOD SERVICE, AND A DRIVE-THRU SELF-SERVE CAR WASH ON 2
ACRES OF LAND IN THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT
(SUBAREA 4) OF THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN,
LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF ETIWANDA AVENUE AND
FOOTHILLBOULEVARD-APN: 1100-161-002.
A. Recitals.
1. Barry Vantiger filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use Permit 99-50, as
described in the title of this Resolufion. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use
Permit request is referred to as "the application."
2. On the 13lh day of December, 2000, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing
on that date.
3. All legal prerequisites pdor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Redtals,
Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing on December 13, 2000, including v~'itten and oral staff reports, together
with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as fellows:
a. The application applies to property located at the northeast comer of Foothill
Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue with a street frontage of 200 feet on Foothill Boulevard and 420
feet on Etiwanda, and is presenUy vacant; and
b. The property to the north of the subject site is developed with a single-family home;
the property to the south consists of vacant land and the Foothill Marketplace Shopping Center to
the southwest; the property to the east is developed with a single-family home and vacant land; and
the property to the west is vacant land; and
c. The site was previously occupied by the Pearson Filling Station and Garage, a
HistodC Point of Interest that has been demolished, and for which a commamoretive plaque will be
provided for the station by the developer, and
d. The project will provide valuable services to the community and is a convenient
location;and F, Xi-IIBIT
pLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 00-139
CUP 99-50 - VANTIGER
December 13, 2000
Page 2
e. The project fosters creative and efficient use of the land by combining fuel service,
car wash service, and fast food service all on one property;, and
f. The project design reflects a quality architectural statement which creatively blends
traditional building materials such as.wood, stucco, tile roofing, and dyer rock consistent with the
architectural flavor of the Etiwanda area; and
g. The project includes substantially landscaped herins along the street frontages
which minimize the visual presence of the ddve-thru lanes as viewed from Etiwanda Avenue and
Foothill Boulevard; and
h. The potential environmental impacts related to the project include biological, air
quality, hazard potentjal, light and glare, cultural resources and storm water runoff. These impacts
can be adequately mitigated to a level of less than significant through compliance with the
recommended environmental mitigation measures referenced herein; and
i. The driveway at the southeast comer of the site does not meet General Plan
driveway separation requirements for intersection policies, but it is intended to be temporary and will
be removed with future development of the parcels to the east. .
(
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2
above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. The proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the
Development Code and the Foothill Boulevard Spedtic Plan, and the purposes of the district in
which the site is located.
b. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be
detmental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity.
c. The proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the
Development Code and the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan.
4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative
Dedaration, together with all written and oral reports induded for the environmental assessment for
the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project
will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and
Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the
findings as follows:
a. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the
California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines
promulgated thereunder;, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared
therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this
Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative
Declaration with regard to the application.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 00-139
CUP 99-50 - VANTIGER
December 13, 2000
Page 3
b. Although the Mitigated Negative Dedaration identifies certain significant
environmental effects that will result if the project is appmved, all significant effects have been
reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on lhe project, which are listed
below as conditions of approval.
c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of
Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the
Initial Study and Mitigated Negate Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the
proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat
upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the
Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the
Planning Commission dudng the public headng, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the
presumption of adverse effect as set forlh in Section 753.5(c-1 -d) of Title 14 of the California Code
of Regulations.
5, Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paregraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above,
this Cornmission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth
below and in the Standard Condilions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
Planninq Division
1) provide a double row of Crape Myrtle trees spacod15 to 20 feet along
the Foothill Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue frontages per the Foothill
Boulevard Spedtic Plan Activily Center requirements. Replace all
London Plane trees shown on plans with Crape Myrtle bees. Note that
trees planted in the public right-of-way shall not exceed 24-inch box
size and shall have no tree grates.
2) Replace King Palm trees with either Queen Palms or Fan Palms. The
Palm tree planting should form a backdrop for the more formally
spaced Crape Myrtle bees.
3) Provide substantial bee and shrub planting between the ddve-thro lane
and the streets to crebte a dense screen for the drive*thru lane.
4) Slopes shall have a softened, meandering appearance.
5) The two existing Palm trees shall be preserved on-site by incorporation
into the project landscaping,
6) Trellis members shall be of substantial size to avoid a spinally
appearance.
7) Provide artwork or other decorative vertical feature in the landscape
area at the intersection of Etiwanda Avenue and Foothill Boulevard to
drew the eye away from the ddve-thru car wash opening and provide a
.~. strong comer presence to the satisfaction of the City Planner.
8) All roof and ground-mounted equipment (including vacuums for car
wash customers and Edison transformer box) shall be fully screened
from all surrounding properly and streets. 11
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 00-139
CUP 99-50 - VANTIGER
December 13, 2000
Page 4
9) Planter islands shall have a minimum outside width of 6 feel
10) All walls and fences shall either be decorative masonry (both sides) or
wrought iron.
11) River rock veneer shall be natural rock rather than an
arti~dal/manufactumd producL
12) The temporary driveway at the southeast comer of the site shall be
removed and replaced with appropriate landscaping and herins upon
development of the parcel(s) to the east to the satisfaction of the City
Planner and the City Engineer.
13) The master plan subrnitted with the application is concoPtual onlY and
is not included in this approval,
En ineerin DMsion:
1) The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical,
except for the 66 kV elecbical) on the project side of Ethvanda Avenue
and Foothill Boulevard shall be undergrounded from the first pole on
the opposite sides of the streets to the first pole off-site on the project
sides of the streets. All services crossing EffiNanda Avenue or Foothill
Boulevard shall be undergrounded at the same time. The developer
may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the City
adopted cost for undergrounding from future development
(redevelopment) as it occurs on the opposite side of the streeL If the
developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within six
months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all
dghts of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate.
2) Parkways shall slope at 2 percent from the top of curb to I foot behind
the sidewalk along all street frontages.
3) Ddveway accent paving shall be located outside the public right-of-way.
4) An in*lieu fee for 1/4 the cost of construc'don of spedal pavers within
the Foothill Bouleverd/Etiwanda Avenue intersection shall be paid to
the City prior to the issuance of building permits. The fee amount shall
be based on the square footage of the intersection.
5) Sidewalks shall cross the drive approach at the zero curb face.
Provide additional public right-of-way as needed.
6) Construct parkway improvements as an "Adivity Center Intersection"
as outlined in the Foothill Boulevard Chapter 17.32 of the Development
Cede and consistent with existing improvements on the southwest
comer of the intersection. Provide sidewalk easement if right-of-way
does not encompass entire public walkway.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 00-139
CUP 99-50 - VANTIGER
December 13, 2000
Page 5
7) The proposed drive approach on Foothill Boulevard will be allowed on
a temporary basis until development of adjacent property to the east.
Once alternate access becomes available, said approach shall be
removed and replaced with "Activity Center" parkway improvements.
Provide cash deposit for said ramoval/replacement.
Environmental Mitiqation
Water
1 ) The site is located within Subarea 9 of the Etiwenda/San Sevine Area
Drainage Policy:.
a) Development shall construct EtiwandaJSan Sevaine Area 9
master plan and/or local storm drain facilities in Foothill
Boulevard from the existing terminus near Cornwall Avenue to
Etiwanda Avenue.
b) Flow increases as a result of development shall be mitigated by
enlarging Basin No. 6.
c) Tract 15711-1 has provided land for an area wide detention
basin. The owner of the land is eligible for reimbursement to
recover proportionate cost of the land and ultimate basin related
radiities (outlet, etc.). Prior to Building permit, provide for a fair
share cost for the use of the land.
2) Development within the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Drainage area is
responsible for the City's adopted drainage fee (master plan and
regional) as well as reimbursement to other development, or the City,
for over sizing of drainage facilities as determined by the City Engineer.
3) With the installation of a podion of a master planned facility, this
development is eligible for fee credits for both the adopted master plan
drainage fee and the developer over sizing reimbursement- These
credits, shall be for the cost of the master plan facility and the
developer shall be eligible for reimbursement of costs in excess of
these credits in accordance with City policy. If the developer fails to
submit for said reimbursement agreement within six months of the
public improvements being accepted by the City, all dghts of the
developer to reimbursement shall terminate.
4) Caltrans has not allowed storm drain fadlities within Foothill Boulevard;
therefore, the required storm drain shall be constructed within the
parkway or a city easement on and east of the project site. Off-site
easements shall be obtained prior to the issuance of building permits.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 00-139
CUP 99-50 - VANTIGER
December 13, 2000
Page 6
Air Quality
1 ) The site shall be treated with water or other soil stabilizing agent
(approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM~o emissions,
in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403.
2) Foothill Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue shall be swept according to a
schedule established by the City to reduce PM~o emissions associated
with censtmction vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary
depending upon time of year of construction.
3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed
25 mph to minimize PM~o emissions from the site dudng such
episodes.
4) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be
applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96
hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions.
5) The construction contractor shall select the construction equipment
used on-site based on low-emission factors and high-energy efficiency.
The construction contractor shall ensure the construction grading plans
include a statement that all censffijction equipment will be tuned and
maintained in accordance with the manufacture~'s spedfications-
6)The censt~uction contractor shall utilize elec~ic or dean altemative fuel
powered equipment where feasible.
7) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction grading
plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when
not in use,
Biological Resources
1)The matore Palm tree shall be preserved on site as shown on the
project plan.
2) The mature trees shall be replaced with appropriate spedes of the
largest available nursery grown trees in accordance with the City of
Rancho Cucamonga Tree Preservation Ordinance.
Hazards
1 ) All appropriate permits will be obtained pdor to construction and must
be documented in a Business Emergency/Contingency Plan to be
approved by the City Emergency Services Office. These safety
measures will mitigate this potentially significant impact to less than
significant impact.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 00-139
CUP 99-50 - VANTIGER
December 13, 2000
Page 7
Aesthetics
1 ) The project lighting shall be designed to avoid casting glare or undue
levels of illumination on the existing residenljal property to the north
using creative lighting locations and opaque screens and directing light
downwards/away from residence.
Cultural Resources
1) A historic commemomtive plaque shall be located on the site
recognizing the Pearson Filling Station and Garage as a Histodc Point
of IntemsL
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2000.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:~~
A
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby
certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the
Planning Goremission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission held on the 13th day of December 2000, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ~.CZAS, HANNERIN0, HCNZEL, 5TEldART, TOLSTOY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
City of Rancho Cucamonga
MITIGATION MONITORING
PROGRAM
Project File No,: CUP 99-50
This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation
measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration forthe above-listed project. This program
has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures am
implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code).
program Components - This MMP centeins the following elements:
1. Conditjonsofappmvalthatactasimpactmitigationmeasuresamrecordedwiththeacti°nand
the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval
are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project.
2. A procedure of compliance and verificeUon has been ouUined for each action necessary. This
procedure designates who will take action, what ac'don will be taken and when, and to whom
and when compliance will be reported.
3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitodng
progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon
recommendations by those responsible for the program.
Program Management - The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The project
planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project
planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out conectiy
and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the
conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department.
Procedures - The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga-
1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in
performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant.
2. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its
corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached
hereto. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and
to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting documentation will
be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority for processing the
project. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address:
City of Rancho Cucamonga - Lead Agency
Planning Division
10500 Civic Center Ddve
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III)
>roject File No.: CUP 99-50, Variance 00-02 Applicant: . Berry Venticier and William Oberhauser
nitial Study Prepared by: Nancy Ferquson Date: November 20. 2000
Site is located within Subarea 9 of the Etiwanda/San Sevain
Drainage Policy: repod and plans 2
a)Construct Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area 9 master plan CE B/C) Review of drainage CIA '
and/or local storm drain facilities in Foothill Blvd from report and plans 2
existing terminus near Cornwall Ave to Etiwanda Ave.
b)Flow increases as a result of development shall be CE B/O Review of drainage
· report and plans C/A
mitigated by enlarging Basin No. 6, 2
c)Tract 15711 has provided land for an area wide detention CE B/O Reviewof drainage C/A 2
basin. The owner of the land is eligible for reimbursement report and plans
to recover proportionate cost of the land and the ultimate
basin related facilities (outlet, etc.) Prior to Building Permit,
provide for a fair share cost for the use of the land.
Development within the EUwanda/San Sevaine Drainage CE B/O Review of drainage C/A 2
area is responsible for the City's adopted drainage fee report and plans
(master plan and regional) as well as reimbursement to
other development, or the City, for over sizing of drainage
fadlit]as aa determined hy the City Fngineer.
With the installation of a portion of a master panned facility, CE B/D Review of drainage C/A
this development is eligible for fee credits far both the report and plans 2
adopted master plan drainage fee and the developer "
oversizing the reimbumement. These credits shall be for
the cost of the master plan facility and the developer shall
be eligible for reimbursement costs in excess of the public
improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the
developer to reimbursement shall terminate.
Caltrans has not allowed storm drain facilities within Foothitl
BIrd; therefore, the required storm drain shall be CE B/D Review of drainage
constructed within the parkway or a city easement on and report and plans C/A 2
east of the project site, Off-site easements shall be
obtained prior to the issuance of building permits.
The site shall be treated with water or other soil stabilizing CP c 2
agent) approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce
PM~o emission, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403.
Foothill Boulevard and Eliwands Avenue shall be swept CP C Review alplens A/C 2
according to a schedule established by the City to reduce
PM~o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off- '
site. TIming may vary depending upon time of year of
construction.
Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds CP C Review of plans A/C 2
exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~0 emissions from the site
during such episodes.
Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and CP C Review of plans A/C 2
RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas
that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o
emissions.
The construction contractor shall select the construction CP B/C Review of plan8 A/C 2
equipment used on-sits based on low emission tactore end
high-energy efficiency. The construction contractor shall
ensure the construction grading plans include a statement
that ell construction equipment will be tuned and
maintained in accordance with the manufacturers
specifications.
The construction contractoF shall utilize e ectdc or dean CP 8/C Review of plans NC 2 '
alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible.
The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-
grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut CP/CE B Review of plans C 2
off equipment when not in use. . ,~~
The mature Palm Tree shall be preserved on-site as shown CP B/C Review a~l appmv'~ C/A 2/3
on the project site plan. Other mature trees proposed for landscape plans to
removal shall be replaced with appropriate species and size address relaxation.
as required by the City I removal and
' repiecemanL
0,1
, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ENG~G DIVISION
$1 Dle .-
THE CITY OF
cuckoOS'C^
Stllf:fReport
DATE: February 7, 2001
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Brent Le Count, AICP, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 99-02 - SACRED HEART
CHURCH - A request to amend the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan to allow
churches subject to a Conditional Use Permit within the Regional Commercial land
use designation (Subarea 4) and to increase the allowable building height for
churches. Related files: Conditional Use Permit 99-56, Tree Removal Permit 00-45,
and Preliminary Application Review 98-12.
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Commission recommends approval of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan
Amendment.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
Land Use Amendment: This amendment will allow churches within the Regional Commercial land
use district of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan subject to a Conditional Use Permit. The
proposed land use amendment would allow the existing Sacred Heart Church and School to remain
in its current location and to expand. The amendment is consistent with the intent of the Regional
Commercial land use district in that churches of this size serve a regional context, serving a larger
community than the immediate area, and taking advantage of the location relative to Foothill
Boulevard and the I-15 Freeway.
Heiqht Amendment: The current maximum height limit for towers and campaniles within Subarea 4
of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan is 45 feet. This amendment will allow churches to have
towers as high as 50 feet with up to ten-foot high crucifixes mounted on top. The inCri~ased building
height (5 feet higher than currently allowed) is not expected to have a negative impact on the
surrounding area or the Foothill Boulevard street scene. The amendment applies only to churches
in Subarea 4 of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan that are not in close proximity to residential
areas. Note that the closest residentially zoned property relative to the Sacred Heart Church is
located approximately 350 feet north of the sanctuary building and will not be impacted bythe minor
increase in building height.
/27
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
FBSPA 99-02 - SACRED HEART CHURCH
February 7, 2001
Page 2
On December 13, 2000, the Planning Commission approved Conditional Use Permit 99-56 for the
proposed physical improvements associated with the Sacred Heart Church, particularly a new
sanctuary, and recommended approval of the proposed Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan
Amendment. If this amendment is not approved, then their Conditional Use Permit approval
becomes void and the church would not be allowed to expand. Copies of the Planning Commission
Staff Report and Minutes of the December 13, 2000 meeting are attached.
FACTS FOR FINDING
The proposed amendment is consistent with the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan and the General
Plan.
CORRESPONDENCE
This item has been advertised in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper as a public hearing.
Public hearing notices were mailed to all propertyowners within Subarea 4 of the Foothill Boulevard
Specific Plan and within 300 feet of the project site.
To date, staff has received phone calls from the property owner to the west (the small triangular
property between the church site and the on-ramp to the northbound 1-15 Freeway) regarding
shared access (this matter was resolved with approval of CUP 99-56, which includes provision for a
shared driveway to this site). No formal complaints regarding the proposed amendment have been
received by staff.
Respectfully submitted,
Brad Buller
City Planner
BB:BLC\ma
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Planning Commission Staff Report dated December 13, 2000
Exhibit "B" - Planning Commission Minutes dated December 13, 2000
Exhibit "C" - Planning Commission Resolution 00-133
Ordinance Approving Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment 99-01
THE C ITY OF
RANClIO CUCAHONGA
Staff Report
DATE: December 13, 2000
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Brent Le Count, AICP, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 99-02 - SACRED
HEART CHURCH - A request to amend the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan to allow
churches subject to a Conditional Use Permit within the Regional Commercial land
use designation (Subarea 4) and to increase the allowable building height for
churches. Related files: Conditional Use Permit 99-56, Tree Removal PerTnit 00-45,
and Preliminary Application Review 98-12.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 99-56 -
SACRED HEART CHURCH - The expansion of the existing Sacred Heart Church
with Phase one consisting of a new 20,000 square foot sanctuary building and
Phase two consisting of an additional 2,200 square feet of sanctuary space and
5,400 square feet of additional classroom space on 11 acres of land in the Regional
Related Commercial Distdct (Subarea 4) of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan,
located at 12704 Foothill Boulevard - APN: 227-211-02, 24, and 25 and 227-221-01
and 02. Related files: Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment 99-02 and Tree
Removal Permit 00-45.
PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:
A. Surroundinq Land Use and Zoninq:
North - Vacant Land and the M5 Freeway; Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per
acre) Etiwanda Specific Plan
South - Foothill Marketplace Shopping Center; Regional Related Commercial designation,
Subarea 4, Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan
East Varies commercial buildings; Community Commercial designation, Subarea 4,
Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan
West Vacant Land and the I-15 Freeway; Regional Commercial designation, Subarea 4,
Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan
T" '
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
CUP 99-56 & FSBPA 99-02 - SACRED HEARTH CHURCH
December 13, 2000
Page 2
B. General Plan Desiqnations:
Project Site - Regional Commercial
North - Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre)
South - Regional Commercial
East - Community Commercial
West - Regional Commercial
C. Site Characteristics: The site is located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard across from the
Foothill Marketplace Shopping Center. The main entrance to the site is the shared signalized
entry for the shopping center (Marketplace Way). The Sacred Heart Church has occupied the
site since 1958. The facilities are arranged in a campus like fashion and include the main
sanctuary building, a multi-purpose building, an administration building, classrooms,
playgrounds, and three residences. These buildings will remain. The site also contains a
small teen center and garage building both of which will be demolished. While old, neither
building has historic status. The existing buildings have an eclectic mix of materials including
stucco, precision block, metal roofing, Mission style tile roofing, and asphalt composition
shingle roofing.
D. Parkinq Calculations:
Number of Number of
Type Number of Parking Spaces Spaces
of Use Seats Ratio Required Provided
Church Assembly 1500 seats 1 per 4 seats 375 380
BACKGROUND: The project was reviewed at a Planning Commission workshop on
January 13, 1999 (Exhibit "L"). The Commission expressed concern regarding master planned
access for the adjacent properties, provision of adequate parking facilities to meet the needs of the
church after the expansion, project phasing, air quality, buffering from the I-15 Freeway, and parking
lot screening. The Commission recommended emphasis on campus style development ofthe site,
preservation of as many heritage trees as possible, and building materials, which are traditional.
ANALYSIS:
A. General: The applicant has done an exemplary job of satisfying the concerns of the
Commission while meeting the expectations and demands of the church. The church will
continue to use the signalized driveway as their primary access to Foothill Boulevard. A new
driveway access to Foothill Boulevard is proposed near their westerly property line, which will
also provide reciprocal access to the adjoining parcel to the west. The Master Plan has a
point of connection to the vacant property to the west. Properties to the east have right-in and
right-out access only because of a median island. If these commercially zoned properties to
the east were to access through the church property there could be vehicle and pedestrian
conflicts; therefore, staff recommends against reciprocal access. Adequate on-site parking is
provided. However, because of the large size of the property and existing buildings, about half
of the parking spaces are located more than 300 feet away from the sanctuary building. The
church proposes to have church visitors drop off family at the main entry and then park. Also,
there is a pergola-covered walkway proposed to connect the northern parking area to the
sanctuary building. The parking areas are scattered because they will serve the sanctuary as
well as the existing school and church administration building at different times. The gate at
the main entry allows for turn around movement in front of the gate.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
CUP 99-56 & FSBPA 99-02 - SACRED HEARTH CHURCH
December 13, 2000
Page 3
The proposed sanctuary building uses stucco and mission style roofing consistent with the
other buildings on-site. The stained glass windows in the existing sanctuarywill be installed in
the new sanctuary. The existing sanctuary building will be stucco to match the new sanctuary.
Also, a long colonnade is proposed along the north side of the church similar to that on the
existing multi-purpose building and church administration building. The projectwill be phased
with Phase I to include the main sanctuary building and Phase II to include a small addition to
the sanctuary and some additional classroom space. There are two rows of trees along the
west edge of the main play area to provide a buffer from the freeway. The Foothill Boulevard
frontage is proposed to have densely landscaped berms (double row of trees with 15 to 20-
foot spacing) with low masonry walls, which will effectively screen parking.
B. Land Use Amendment: The site falls within the Regional Commercial designation of Subarea
4 of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. This land use designation does not allow churches
as a permitted or conditionally permitted use. Therefore, this proposes an amendment to the
Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan to allow churches within the Regional Commercial land use
district. Staff is in support of the proposed land use amendment as it would allow the existing
Sacred Heart Church and School to remain in it's current location. The Church will be able to
efficiently and functionally develop the site to its full potential. The amendment is consistent
with the intent of the Regional Commercial land use district in that churches of this size serve
a regional context, serving a larger community than the immediate area and taking advantage
of the location relative to Foothill Boulevard and the 1-15 Freeway.
C. Heiqht Amendment: The overall building height for the church is proposed to be 50 feet with a
9-foot high crucifix mounted to the roof. The current maximum height limit for towers and
campaniles within Subarea 4 is 45 feet. The increased building height (5 feet higher than
currently allowed) is not expected to have a negative impact on the surrounding area or the
Foothill Boulevard street scene. The amendment applies only to churches in Subarea 4 of the
Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan that are not in close proximity to residential areas. Note that
the closest residentially zoned property is located approximately 350 feet north of the
sanctuary building and will not likely be impacted by the minor increase in building height.
D. Desjqn Review Committee: The Design Review Committee (Stewart, Coleman) reviewed the
project on October 17, 2000, at which time the Committee requested a restudy of the building
height. The Committee (McNiel, Stewart, Coleman) reviewed the revised project on
November 14, 2000, and recommended approval. Two alternative designs were presented
which were lower, yet still did not comply with the 45-foot height limit. The Committee was
actually in favor of both the 59-foot high and 504oot high building designs but the church has
decided that it favors the 50-foot high building with the 9-foot crucifix on top.
E. Technical Review Committee: The Grading and Technical Review Committees reviewed the
project and recommended approval subject to the conditions outlined in the attached
Resolution of Approval.
F. Tree Removal: The site contains a number of mature trees including a remnant Eucalyptus
windrow along the Foothill Boulevard frontage. Most of the trees will be removed to
accommodate the proposed improvements with the exception of the majodty of trees
surrounding the existing sanctuary building, which will remain.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
CUP 99-56 & FSBPA 99-02 - SACRED HEARTH CHURCH
December 13, 2000
Page 4
G. Environmental Assessment: The applicant has provided Part I of the Initial Study and staff
has completed Part II, the Environmental Checklist. In completing the checklist, staff noted
potential impacts related to air quality during construction, tree removal, and light and glare.
These potential impacts can be reduced to a level of less than significant through compliance
with South Coast Air Quality Management Distdct adopted construction practices, replacement
of trees with new landscaping for the church, and creative placement and orientation of new
lighting. If the Planning Commission concurs, than issuance of a Mitigated Negative
Declaration is in order.
CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily
Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within
Subarea 4 of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Commission approve Conditional Use
Permit 99-56 and Tree Removal Permit 99-36 and forward recommendation to the City Council for
approval of Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment 99-02 through adoption of the attached
Resolutions of Approval and issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration.
Respectfully submitted,
Brad Buller
City Planner
BB:BLC:mlg
Attachments: Exhibit"A" - Applicant's Letter dated October25, 1999
Exhibit "B" - Site Utilization Map
Exhibit "C" - Existing Conditions Plan
Exhibit "D" - Site Plan
Exhibit "E" - Grading Plan
Exhibit "F" - Landscape Plan
Exhibit "G" - Site Sections
Exhibit "H" - Building Sections
Exhibit "1" - Elevations
Exhibit "J" - Roof Plan
Exhibit "K" - Illustratives
Exhibit "L" - Planning Commission Workshop Minutes dated January 13, 1999
Exhibit "M" - Design Review Committee Action dated October 17, and November
14, 2000
Exhibit "N" - Initial Study
Resolution Recommending Approval of Foothill Boulevard Specific Amendment
99-02
Resolution of Approval with Conditions for Conditional Use Permit 99-56
' 0 ,Sacred Catholic Ctm d
12704 FOOTHILL BLVD.. RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 91739-9764
PHONE (909) 899-1049
October 25, 1999
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Building Commission
Respected Members:
I realize that it has been a considerable time since we had the opportunity, in an informal
way, to lay before you for your initial information our plans to redevelop the Fdothill
Boulevard site of Sacred Heart Church and to let you know of our decision to abandon the
proposal to develop the Etiwanda Avenue site.
We have been proceeding, slowly but surely, gathering the necessary reports, data and
demographic surveys to present our application for a change of land use in order to construct
a new church building, seating some 1200 in the first phase (and up to 1500 in a second
phase), new school administration and classroom building, and a new assistant priest's
residence.
You are as aware as we are of the tremendous growth in our city, we are experiencing
considerably overcrowding on Sundays (we already use outside seating for 200 to 300 people,
with big screen TVs, on a regular basis). Our analysis of the demographic data indicates
further growth in general population in the city, which will indicate a growth in Catholic
population. Such a large church is necessary in order for us to serve the people who wish to
worship God here in a comfortable and safe fashion. Concomitant with that growth is a
growth in school enrollment, hence the need for more school facilities.
Some of our current site is un- (or under°) used at present; we intend to develop the whole
site in accordance with the city's landscaping code, to beautify and enhance the local area as
one of the city gateways.
We shall be demolishing two buildings currently on site: a two bedroom house on Foothill
Boulevard, currently occupied by the assistant priest, and the old (and original) building of
the first church, the erstwhile wine .stor~ This second building is currently unused, and is
closed for any future use. Its loss will not be a problem for us. The land area will become a
park area adjacent to Foothill Boulevard. The two bedroom house, on the other hand, is
currently occupied by another priest and will need to be replaced by a similar dwelling,. as
shown on the plans.
133
Originally we had intended to demolish the existing church, but after listening to
parishioners (some of whom built it in the 50s) we have derided to keep it, and convert it to
use as a social hall. k is nearly 50 years old and in good physical condition and contains
many memories for many people of our parish and dty. The first mayor of Rancho
Cucamonga, for instance, Jim Frost, recently renewed his marriage vows of 25 years in this
church. We shall, of course, comply with necessary code for change of use.
I hope that you will look favorably upon our application. k is our intention to remain as a
highly visible part of the City of Rancho Cucamonga in our present, historici location, and
to be a part of the development of our dry into the next millennium. If there is any way
that, fully complying with all legal requirements, the process of CUP application could be
expedited so that we may begin construction in the early part of the new year, I shall be very
Fateful.
S ~C~,.~.~%
incer '
Very Rev Steven C. Porter STL VF
Pastor & Vicar forane
PARKING SUMM~Y
~=:~-::=-:.. ,,MASTER SITE PLAN
SITE $EC'RON B - B EAST / WEST
. . , ~OW.
EXTERIOR FINISH LEGEND COLORS
F 0
B
C E B T K L 'C R
~YPICAL SOUTH ELEVATION / ~OTHILL BLVb. WALL SECT ON
'"~ EXTERIOR FINISH LEGEND COLORS
COLOR LEGEND
A
APSE
J X L K A N C A E
TYP CAL EAST ELEVATION WALL SECTK~N
EXTERIOR FlffiSH LEGEND COLORS
T
W Z E N L K B T Z.
~TYPICAL WALL SECTION ~ NORTH ENTRANCE
t~O~Tl~ ~lr~4~C~ EL~Y~TIO~
~ OT{ OF MMCHO C~C~tlOl~q~/~OffbtItO~L
SITE PLAN KEYNOTES
......... ~" ~g~ OF ~H ~q~RORq~ / (OMbITgOlffiL ~ FE~BT
SKETCH VIEW FROM NORTH
· I SHRINE & V1STA OF FAh pA)ZMS
PRIVATE CHURCHICCESS DRiVEWA' & GATED E~TRANCE '
MODEL PHOTO
pROPOSED ENTRANCE SIGN & C~RDEN WALL
rOOT~LL ~L~'b, 5 5~{C,~E:,~. ~g~
CITY Of RANCHO CUCAMONGA
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
Adjourned Meeting
January 13. 1999
Chairman McNiel called the Adjourned Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning
Commission to order at 10:20 p.m. The meeting was held in the Rains Room at Rancho
Cucamonga.Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. California.
ROLL CALL
COMMISSIONERS: PRESENT: Rich Macias, John Mannedno, Larry McNiel. Pare Stewart,
Peter Tolstoy
ABSENT: None
STAFF PRESENT: Brad Buller, City Planner; Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer; Brent Le Count,
Associate Planner. Betty Miller, Associate Civil Engineer; Rebecca
Van Buren, Associate Planner; Cecilia Williams. Associate Planner;, Rudy
Zeledon. Assistant Planner
NEW BUSINESS
A. PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW 98-12 - SACRED HEART CHURCH - The proposed
demolition of an existing church sanctuary and two additional buildings and the construction
of a new Sanctuary along with the development of a Master Plan for the 10.6 acre site
located in the Regional Related Commercial District (Subarea 4) of the Foothill Boulevard
Specific Plan, on the north side of FoothilI Boulevard, eastoflnterstate15.ApN: 227-211-
24 and 25 and 227-221-01 and 02.
Brad Buller, City Planner, explained the purpose and goals of the Pre-Application Review process.
The project architect Ted WoOds and Father Porter introduced the project and gave a brief history
on why they are choosing to stay on Foothill Boulevard and not pursue the Etiwanda site. Mr.
Woods described the various design solutions to the church campus and architecture of the new
church building.
Cecilia Willjams, Associate Planner, reviewed staffs comments, noting staffs support for the use
remaining on site and the proposed expansion. She highlighted issues of street access and
circulation, architecture, master planning for adjacent properties, and tree preservation.
Chairman McNiel stated the architecture is eclectic, but that it is unique and he likes it. He
expressed concerns about the sheet metal roof and indicated they should consider a different type
of roof material, more resistant to wind.
Commissioner Mannerino liked the idea of a campus setting for the site. He noted the side view
looks different from the front view. He liked the building. He indicated he would like to see the
church stay at its present location and expand.
Commissioner Stewart thought there are too many design styles happening on the main church
building. She liked the Foothill Boulevard facade shown because it looks "Mission" style. She
preferred more of the Mission style architecture with more compatible colors. She felt the east
elevation is too high. She encouraged the church to master plan for the lot to the west.
Commissioner Tolstoy expressed concerns regarding having children attend school on a street
as busy as Foothill Boulevard for environmental reasons, but he supported the use. He advised
the applicant to work with the neighbor to come up with a good plan for the west parcel. He did
not feel that a gas station would be a good use for the vacant lot west of the church site. He
thought the building should have some coherence in architecture to look coordinated rather than
eclectic. He liked the front of the church, but felt the east elevation has too much roof and the side
elevations look industdal. He requested landscaping along Foothill Boulevard to hide cars in the
parking lot with a combination of berming, low walls, and landscaping. He did not think the sheet
metal roof lends itself to a church. He suggested they soften the industrial look on the east side.
He commented that the existing church building has a nice flavor.
Commissioner Macias felt the church expansion is a great thing for the community. He asked that
the applicant address the traffic and circulation comments outlined by staff. He thought it is
interesting architecture, but he preferred Mission architecture in the historic winery tradition. He
questioned if the existing bell tower is compatible with what is being proposed. He agreed with
Commissioner Tolstoy regarding enhanced landscaping and berming to hide cars parked in the
parki0g lot.
Father Porter stated the buildings along Foothill Boulevard are brick and cannot be moved. He
said the renovated buildings will be stuccoed to match the sanctuary architecture with compatible
colors to create a cohesive Catholic flavor and the tower will be renovated to match new building
with stucco to match.
Mr. Bullet summarized the meeting, noting that the following items are to be addressed when the
church submits a development application:
1) Master Plan to show point of ingress and egress for properties to the east and west
and allow reciprocal access.
2) Ensure that there is adequate parking on-site to accommodate the expanded
sanctuary.
3) Gated intersections will need to be moved.
4) Establish a campus architecture for the site,
5) Where there are heritage trees, preserve where possible,
6) Concern expressed for the standing seam metal roof proposed. Consider an
alternative roof material.
7) Provide the City with a phasing plan
8) Air Quality is a concern. Consider reforestation in playground areas to provide a
buffer for children along Foothill Boulevard and the I-15 Freeway.
9) Architecture - Staff and the Design Review Committee will work with the applicant on
it.
10) Provide adequate screening to the parking lot with landscaping and berming.
11) Renovate the Bell Tower to be compatible with the sanctuary that is proposed.
PC Adjourned Minutes -2- January 13, 1999
DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS
7:10 p.m. Brent Le Count October 17, 2000
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 99-56 - SACRED HEART
CHURCH - The expansion of the existing Sacred Heart Church with Phase one consisting of a new
20,000 square foot sanctuary building and Phase two consisting of an additional 2,200 square feet
of sanctuary space and 5,400 square feet of additional classroom space on 11 acres of land in the
Regional Related Commercial district of Subarea 4 of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan located at
12704 Foothill Boulevard - APN: 227-211-02, 24, 25 and 227-221-01 and 02~
Desi.qn Paremetem: The site is located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard across from the
Foothill Marketplace Shopping Center. The main entrance to the site is the shared signalized entry
for the shopping center (Marketplace Way). The Sacred Heart Church has occupied the site since
1958. The facilities are arranged in a campus like fashion and include the main sanctuary building,
a multi-purpose building, an administration building, classrooms and playgrounds, and three
residences. These buildings will remain. The site also contains a small teen center and garage
building both of which will be demolished. While old, neither building has histodc status. The
existing buildings have an eclectic mix of materials including stucco, precision block, metal roofing,
mission-style tile roofing, and asphalt composition shingle roofing.
Tree Removal: The site contains a number of mature trees including a remnant Eucalyptus windrow
along the Foothill Boulevard frontage. Most of the trees will be removed to accommodate the
proposed improvements with the exception of the majodty of trees surrounding the existing
sanctuary building, which will remain.
Variance: The new sanctuary is proposed with a building height of 50 feet and a 59-foot curving
parepet. The maximum building height permitted by the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan is 85 feet
high with 45-foot high towere. The increased building and tower height will require the filing of a
Variance application. The increase in height is necessary to accommodate the architectural design
preferences of the church for the sanctuary building. The parepet element is 60 feet wide, which
staff believes goes well beyond the Code intent to be flexible for "towere, campaniles and rotundas."
There is nothing unusual about the shape or size of the property and no apparent hardship to justify
issuance of the Variance. The applicant will also needs a Variance to allow a 6-foot high wall with a
33-foot setback where a 45-foot building setback along Foothill Boulevard is required. This is
necessary to accommodate an existing home on the site, which will be preserved. Variance
application has not been submitted yet.
Sound Wall: The site is subject to excessive noise from the 1-15 Freeway. A noise study was
conducted which recommends a 240 foot long, 12-foot high sound wall along the northbound on-
ramp for 1-15 Freeway. The off ramp is elevated above the site and the applicant is proposing that
the sound wall be located at the top of slope along the off-ramp to maximize sound attenuation.
Past experience has shown that Caltrans will not allow sound walls to be built within their right-of-
way when other reasonable alternatives are available (i.e., building wall on church property line). If
the wall were to be built on the church property, it would have to be as high as 38 feet to effectively
attenuate noise. A 12-foot high wall along the off-ramp would obviously be aesthetically preferable to
a 38-foot high wall on-site. The applicant has had preliminary meetings with Caltrans and claims
that Caltrans s w ng to accept the wall along the shoulder; however, two other developer requests
have been denied by Caltrans in the last 12 months.
DRC COMMENTS
CUP 99-56 - SACRED HEART CHURCH
October 17, 2000
Page 2
Planninq Commission Workshop: The project was reviewed at a Planning Commission workshop in
January of 1999 (see attached minutes). The Commission had the following comments/concems:
1. The Master Plan should show points of ingress and egress for properties to the east and
westandallowreciprocalaccess. The Master Plan has a point of connection to the property
to the west. The applicant believes that the property to the east has Sufficient access from
Foothill Boulevard so it is unnecessary for the church to provide access. Properties to the
east ha ve right-in and right-out access only beca use of median island. If these commercially
zoned properties to the east were to access through the church property there could be
vehicle and pedestrian conflicts; therefore, staff recommends against reciprocal access.
2. Ensure that there is adequate parking on-site to accommodate the expanded sanctuary,
Adequate on-site parking is provided. However, about half of the parking spaces are located
more than 300 feet away from the sanctuary building. The church proposes to have church
visitors drop off family at the main entry and then park. Also, there is a pergola-covered
walkway proposed to connect the northem parking area to the sanctuary building. The
parking areas are scattered because they will serve the sanctuary as well as the existing
school and church administration at different times.
3. Gated intersections will need to be moved, Thegateatthemainentryallowsfortumaround
movement in front of the gate.
4. Establish campus architecture for the site. The proposed sanctuary uses stucco and
mission style roofing consistent with the other buildings on-site. Also, a long colonnade is
proposed along the north side of the church similar to that on the existing multi-purpose
building and church administration building.
5. Where there are heritage trees, preserve where possible. Many of the trees areproposed to
be removed to accommodate the project. The trees around the north, south, and west sides
of the existing sanctuary will be preserved and some of the larger trees in the southeast
comer of the site are intended to be relocated on-site. Planning Commission approval of a
Tree Removal Permit is necessary to remove or relocate mature trees.
6. Consider an alternative to standing seam metal roofing. The current design has concrete
mission-style roof material.
7. Provide the City with a Phasing Plan. Phase one will include the main sanctuary building
and Phase two will include a small addition to the sanctuary and some additional classroom
space.
8, Air quality is a concern. Consider reforestation in playground areas to provide a buffer for
children along Foothill Boulevard and the I-15 Freeway. The playground areas have been
relocated away from the I- 15 Freeway frontage. There are two rows of trees along the west
edge of the main play area to provide a buffer from the freeway. The overall plan includes
preservation/relocation of 78 existing trees plus planting of 446 new trees. Sound
attenuation wa// may also assist in improving air quality.
9. Staff and the Design Review Committee will work with the applicant on architecture.
DRC COMMENTS
CUP 99-56 - SACRED HEART CHURCH
October 17, 2000
Page 3
10. Provide adequate screening to the parking lot with landscaping and berming. The Foothill
Boulevard frontage is proposed to have densely landscape berms (double row of trees with
15 to 20-foot spacing) with low masonry walls.
11. Renovate the Bell Tower to be compatible with the sanctuary that is proposed. The
application proposes to stucco the existing sanctuary building to match the new sanctuary.
Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee
discussion.
Maior Issues: The following items will be the focus of Committee discussion:
1. Although the building design is attractive, it does not meet height limitations of Code.
Variances can only be granted where there is something unusual, such as topography that
warrants design flexibility. The Committee should discuss whether or not the excessive
building height could be justified. The earlier design shown at the Commission Workshop
had a lower overall height but was still in excess of code requirements. Elimination of the
large parapet-like wall on the south elevation would reduce the building height by 9 feet.
Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the
Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues:
1. Columns for the pergola connecting the northern parking lot to the sanctuary should match
those of the sanctuary.
2. Parking lot landscape islands should have the typical oval shape rather than a sharp,
crescent shape. The sharply pointed planters leave less room for plants to grow and can
result in irrigation over spray onto the parking area.
3. Provide mostly Sycamore trees along the Foothill Boulevard frontage with some African
Sumac trees mixed in consistent with Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan*** Sycamores and
African Sumacs are Foothill Boulevard theme trees that Caltrans has typically not allowed
within the Foothill Boulevard right of way so they must be shifted on-site.
4. Augment the berrn/Iow wall/trees along the Foothill Boulevard frontage with shrub planting to
further screen views of the parking area.
Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be
incorporated into the project design without discussion:
1. All roof and ground mounted equipment and utilities shall be fully screened.
2. Surround trash enclosure and Edison box with dense shrub planting.
3. Trash enclosure should feature overhead shade trellis and roll-up door.
4. Avoid having a double fence condition along the project perimeter. Church should make a
good faith effort to work with adjoining property owners to remove existing chain link fence
and replace with single fence.
/57
DRC COMMENTS
CUP 99-56 - SACRED HEART CHURCH
October 17, 2000
Page 4
Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the project be redesigned in light of the above
comments and brought back for further review.
Attachment
Design Review Committee Action:
Members Present: Pam Stewart, Dan Coleman
Staff Planner: Brent Le Count
The Committee requested that the project be revised in light of staff's comments and provided
the following additional direction:
1. The excessive building height is an issue. Restudy the building to lower it as much as
possible while still meeting the functional necessities of the church.
2. Have the noise consultant analyze the possibility of providing noise mitigation directly
along the playground edge. This could be in the form of a combined berm with sound
wall on top. The east side of the berm could act as informal stadium seating for the
playground.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
Adjourned Meeting
JanUary 13, 1999
Chairman McNiel called the Adjourned Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning
Commission to order at 10:20 p.m. The meeting was held in the Rains Room at Rancho
Cucamonga. Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California.
ROLL CALL
COMMISSIONERS: PRESENT: Rich Madas, John Mannedno, Larry McNiel, Pam Stewart,
Peter Tolstoy
ABSENT: None
STAFF PRESENT: Brad Bu er, City Planner, Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer, Brent Le Count,
Associate Planner; Betty Miller, Associate Civil Engineer;, Rebecca
Van Buren, Associate Planner;, Cecilia Williams., Associate Planner, Rudy
Zeledon, Assistant Planner
NEW BUSINESS
A. PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW 98-12 - SACRED HEART CHURCH - The proposed
demolition of an existing church sanctuary and two additional buildings and the construction
of a new sanctuary along with the development of a Master Plan for the 10.6 acre site
located in the Regional Related Commerdal Distdct (Subarea 4) of the Foothill Boulevard
· Specific Plan, on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, east of Interstate 15 - APN: 227-211-
24 and 25 and 227-221-01 and 02.
Brad Bullet, City Planner; explained the purpose and goals of the Pre-Application Review process.
The project architect Ted Woods and Father Porter introduced the project and gave a bdef history
on why they are choosing to stay on Foothill Boulevard and not pursue the Etiwanda site. Mr.
Woods described the various design solutions to the church campus and architecture of the new
church building.
Cecilia Williams, Associate Planner, reviewed staffs comments, noting staffs support for the use
remaining on site and the proposed expansion. She highlighted issues of street access and
circulation, architecture, master planning for adjacent properties. and tree preservation.
Chairman McNiel stated the architecture is eclectic, but that it is unique and he likes it. He
expressed concems about the sheet metal roof and indicated they should consider a different type
o1' roof material, more resistant to wind.
Commissioner Mannerino liked the idea of a campus setting for the site. He noted the side view
looks different from the front view. He liked the building. He indicated he would like to see the
church stay at its present location and expand.
Commissioner Stewart thought there are too many design styles happening on the main church
building. She liked the Foothill Boulevard facade shown because it looks 'Mission" style. She
preferred more of the Mission style architecture with more compatible colors. She felt the east
elevation is too high. She encouraged the church to master plan for the lot to the west.
Commissioner Tolstoy expressed concorns regarding having children attend school on a street
as busy as Foothill Boulevard for environmental reasons, but he supported the use. He advised
the applicant to work with the neighbor to come up with a good plan for the west parcel. He did
not feel that a gas station would be a good use for the vacant lot west of the church site. He
thought the building should have some coherence in architecture to look coordinated rather than
eclectic. He liked the front of the church, but felt the east elevation has too much roof and the side
elevations look industdal. He requested landscaping along Foothill Boulevard to hide cars in the
parking lot with a combination of harming, low walls, and landscaping. He did not think the sheet
metal roof lends itself to a church. He suggested they soften the industrial look on the east side.
He commented that the existing church building has a nice flavor.
Commissioner Madas felt the church'expansion is a great thing for the community. He asked that
the applicant address the traffic and circulation comments outlined by staff. He thought it is
interesting architecture, but he preferred Mission architecture in the histodc winery tradition. He
questioned if the existing bell tower is compatible with what is being proposed. He agreed with
Commissioner Tolstoy regarding enhanced landscaping and berming to hide cars parked in the
parki.ng lot.
Father Porter stated the buildings along Foothill Boulevard are bdck and cannot be moved. He
said the renovated buildings will be stuccoed to match the sanctuary architecture with compatible
colors to create a cohesive Catholic flavor and the tower will be renovated to match new building
with stucco to match.
Mr. Bullet summarized the meeting, noting that the following items are to be addressed when the
church submits a development application:
1) Master Plan to show point of ingress and egress for properties to the east and west
and allow reciprocal access.
2) Ensure that there is adequate parking on-site to accommodate the expanded
sanctuary,
3) Gated intersections will need to be moved.
4) EStablish a campus architecture for the site.
5) Where there are heritage trees, proserye where possible,
6) Concern expressed for the standing seam metal roof proposed, Consider an
alternative roof material.
7) Provide the City with a phasing plan
8) Air Quality is a concern. Consider reforestation in playground areas to provide a
buffer for children along Foothill Boulevard and the 1-15 Freeway.
9) Architecture - Staff and the Design Review Committee will work with the applicant on
it.
10) Provide adequate screening to the parking lot with landscaping and barruing.
11) Renovate the Bell Tower to be compatible with the sanctuary that is proposed.
PC Adjoumed Minutes -2- January 13, 1999
EAST 'ELEVATION
· - SOUTH ELEVATI ~& CAfi4IDIIAI. CLERESTO.Y WINDOWS
FOOthILL BOULEVARD FACADE ~e co,,.uous ~A.o o, OmCO.,T~W C..A~C .L.
NORTH ELEVATION
DESIGN REVIEVV COMMENTS
8:20 p.m. Brent Le Count November 14, 2000
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 99-56 - SACRFI')
HEART CHURCH - The expansion of the existing Sacred Heart Church with Phase one
consisting of a new 20,000 square foot sanctuary building and Phase two consisting of an
additional 2,200 square feet of sanctuary space and 5,400 square feet of additional classroom
space on 11 acres of land in the Regional Related Commercial district of Subarea 4 of the
Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan located at 12704 Foothill Boulevard - APN: 227-211-02, 24, 25
and 227-221-01 and 02.
Backqround: The project was reviewed by the Committee on October 17, 2000. The Committee
(Stewart and Coleman) had the following comments:
1. The excessive 59-foot building height is an issue. Restudy the building to lower it as
much as possible while still meeting the functional necessities of the church.
The applicant has provided two alternative designs for the Committee to review. Both
show an overall building height of 51 feet (6 feet above the maximum height allowed by
the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan) and both have an 8-foot high cross on top. Both
alternatives are 8 feet lower than the original proposal The alternative designs differ
slightly in terms of use of materials, subtle massing differences, and cross details. Staff
is of the opinion that both alternatives represent a reasonable compromise for building
height and achieve a high quality of architectural design. The Committee has the
opportunity to pick their preferred alternative.
Staff believes that the increase in building height is reasonable given that the church
requires certain technical and aesthetic considerations that dictate the building height
that are different from the commercial uses now permitted in the area. The applicant is
concurrently processing a Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan amendment to allow
churches in the Regional Commercial land use designation of Subarea 4. The Specific
Plan can also be amended to allow churches to be up to 60 feet high when not located
within 300 feet of a residential area (the Sacred Hear Church sanctuary building is
approximately 350 feet away from the nearest residential property) subject to approval of
a Conditional Use Permit.
2. Have the noise consultant analyze the possibility of providing noise mitigation directly
along the playground edge. This could be in the form of a combined berm with sound
wall on top. The east side of the berm could act as informal stadium seating for the
playground.
After further research, Staff has determined that the noise barrier is only necessary to
mitigate freeway noise for the playground area, not for the sanctuary building. The
playground area is an existing part of the church campus and the future classrooms
planned with this application will not increase the number of students at the facility.
Normal construction should provide adequate sound attenuation, to comply with city
standards for interior noise/eve/s, for the sanctuary and other new buildings. Therefore,
it has been determined that sound attenuation is not required for the project in order to
address compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the
Genera/Plan.
DRC COMMENTS
CUP 99-56 - SACRED HEART CHURCH
November 14, 2000
Page 2
Outstandin.q Issues: The following issues were identified in the previous comments to the
Committee dated October 17, 2000, but remain unresolved. The applicant agreed to the
comments. They should be included as conditions of approval for the project.
1. Columns for the pergola connecting the northern parking lot to the sanctuary should
match those of the sanctuary.
2. 'Parking lot landscape islands should have the typical oval shape rather than a sharp,
crescent shape. The sharply pointed planters leave less room for plants to grow and
can result in irrigation over spray onto the parking area.
3. Provide mostly Sycamore trees along the Foothill Boulevard frontage consistent with
Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. Sycamores are Foothill Boulevard theme trees that
Caltrans has typically not allowed within the Foothill Boulevard right-of-way so they must
be shifted on-site.
4. Augment the berm/Iow wall/trees along the Foothill Boulevard frontage with shrub
planting to further screen views of the parking area.
5. All roof- and ground-mounted equipment and utilities shall be fully screened.
6. Surround trash enclosure and Edison box with dense shrub planting.
7. Trash enclosure should feature overhead shade trellis and roll-up door.
8. Avoid having a double fence condition along the project perimeter. Church should make
a good faith effort to work with adjoining property owners to remove existing chain link
fence and replace with single fence.
Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Committee recommend approval subject
to the above comments.
Desi.qn Review Committee Action:
Members Present: Larry McNiel, Pare Stewart, Dan Coleman
Staff Planner: Brent Le Count
The Committee reviewed the revised plans and chose Alternative B. However, the Committee
is comfortable with both the original design and Alternative B and if the applicant so chooses,
Both alternatives can proceed to the Planning Commission for review.
ENVIRONMENTAL
....... INFORMATION FORM
(Part I - Initial Study)
Planning Dn~,on
(909) 47/-2750
The purpose of this form is to inform the City of the basic components of the proposed
project so that the City may review the project pursuant to City policies, ordinances, and
guidelines; the California Environmental Quality Act; and the City's Rules and Procedures
to Implement CEQA. It is important ~hat the information requested in this application be
provided in full.
INCOMPleTE APPLICATIONS WiLL NOT BE PROCESSED. Please note that it is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure
that the application is complete at the b~ne of submittal; City staff will not be available to petform work requited to provide missing
information.
Pmject~tle: Sacred Heart Church & School - Etiwanda
Name&Addressofprojectowneds): The Roman Catholic Bishop of San Bernardino
1201 E. Hi htand Ave.
San Bernar~ino CA 92404
Name & Address ofdeveloperorproject ~onson Very Rev. Steven C. Porter
Sacred Heart Catholic Church
12704 Foothill Blvd.
Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739
Contrition&Address: Architect, C. Ted Woods Very Rev. Steven C. Porter
CA 92339 12704
Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739
Telephone Numben /FAX (909) 794-6161 (909) 899-1049 ext 18
FAX ( 909 ) 899-3229
Name&Addtessofpersonpreparinglhis'form.(ifdiffetentfromabove): C. Ted Woods
Telephone Number:.
INITSTD1.WPD - 4/96 Page I
Information indicated by asterisk (') is not required of non-construction CUP's unless otherwise requested by staff.
'1) Provide a full scale (8-112 x 11) copy of the USGS Quadrent Sheet(s) w~hich includes the project site, and indicate the
site boundaries.
2) Provide a set of color photogrephs which show representative views into the site from the north, south, east and west;
views into; and fr~re the site from the primary access points which serve the site; and ropresentative views of significant
features fn2n~ the site. Include a map showing location of each photograph.
NOTE: See'phOtos of existing site inside Feasibility Stud , March 1998,
3) ProjectLocation(describe): Diocese Of San Bernardino, Sacred Heart C~urch, in the cit
of Rancho Cucamonga, ~1/~:, SUP area 4 - ~.'tlwanGa/'/.one ~, 12704 Eou~hill
Blvd. That:-p0rtion of the East 1/2 of section 5~T.1S, R;:6..W¥~S.B. as shown
on the record of survey book 36 pae 38 in the City o~ Rancno cucamonga
County of San Bernardino, records o~ sai~ county.
4) Assessor s Parcel Numbers (attach additional sheet if necessaP/):
see attached site map ~ith list o£ existing parcel numIers,
· 5] Gross Site Area (acYsq. ~.): Gross = 465,928 sq ft 10,69 acres
NetSiteArea~otals~es~em~usareaofpub~stree~&proposeddedica~n~:
Net = 465,928 sq ft 17,670 sq ft (area of RDW) = 448,258 sq ft
or 10.28 acres
~ Descdbeanyproposedgenerelplanamendmentorzone ~angewhich wouldaffed theprcjedsite ~ additionalsheet
~nece~ary:
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tne Foothill ~lv~. ~pecl~c ~an - bep~. ~967
Sub area 4 - Etiwanda
@ Etiwanda Gateway ~ty Entrance Sign
~cludea ~sc~ptionofafipennitswhichwillbe~ecessa~from ~eCi~ dRan~oCucamon~ andoffiergovemmen~l
agendes~o~er~fufiyimplement~epm]e~"
~.) Conditional Use Permit: for continuing, improving and expanding existin
Catholic Church and K-8 school.
2.) Land use change for existing non-conforming use.
3.) Tree removal (damaged as per arborist's report attached.)
4.) Demol~tlon ~two s~ngle story woo~ ~rame ~n ~alTrans Row ~o be dedicate~
5.) Building construction permit.
6.) State of California Dept of Transportation.
Describe the ph~al se~ing of He site as ~ exits beam ~e project ~c~ding ~at~n on topog~phy. soft stab~. plants
and an~a~, mature trees. ~ and ma~. d~age coupes, and scen~ aspects. Describe any ex~g st~ctums on site
~cluding age and conditio~ and the use of ~e st~c~ms. A~ach photographs of s~n~cant ~atu~s descdbe~ ~ addi~n.
site a~ sourues of ~at~n (Le., geo~g~al an~or hydmlogic studies. b~ and amheological su~eys, ~ffic stu~e~:
1.) Attached with th~s application are two spiral bound reports:
Eeasibility Report, March 1998, and an Information Resource Base.
2.) Resultin from a digital to ographic surve of the existing site, by
the civi~ enqineer; plus a ~tate of CA certified arborist's report,
The following is a ~escription:
buildinqs~ and
3.) At the "Etiwanda Gateway" entrance to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at
L~e l-lD/'~'OOLnlll ~IV~. exit exists a Roman Catholic C~urc~ anG cnurch
K-8 school. The setting of the s~te is as a parklike campus setting
which ~as Deen ~n existence s~nce 1951, currently wlth historic l~nks
to the Ellenas family winery datinq back to the 1920's.
4.) The church and school have chosen to stay at their existing si'te with
intentions of constructing a new sanctuary and improving the school.
5.) The master plan illustrates that the existing buildings, driveways sid
walks, site utilities~ vegetation and trees~ and site drainage w~li be
im roved across the whole site. The now prominent existing church and
bell tower will remain. -.'-';,
6.) New main private entrance driveway (to be named "Sacred Heart Way") is
plannea along wltn a new main entrance sign aria ma~n gate. vehicular
access to the adjacent west property has been taken into consideration
ana ~ncluded along w~th the plannea row and Pus stop/deaccelerat~un
turn lane.
7.°) The overall plan is to remain, improve, beautify, and expand this
existing ~acility to become a renewed, prominent, compatible use.
10) Desc~be~ekn~wncuitura~ancy~rhist~ca~aspects~fthesite.Sitea#s~umes~finf~rrna~n(b~k~pub~ishedmp~rtsand
omlh~to~:
See histor~ of the site written in bound report: Information Base
Resource Base.)
11) Describeenynoisesoumesandtheirlevels ~atnOwa~es~e~ roadwaynoise. etc) andhowtheywillaffect
~ proposed uses: ·
The site is bounded along the northwest side by 'freeway 1-15. At peak
commuting times, the freeway generates noise. The actual noise level~ h~v,
~ot Deen measured. T~e ~nterior activity of the church and school are not
affected by this background noise. The existing outdoor school play field
wi~i move Lo a new location on site wnlc~, alt~ou n is some relative dista;
away from 1-15, will be more directly exposed.' Tge landscaping plans alre.
· ncluee tall evergreen/pine trees to help reduce the direct sound levels al
to also improve the air q.~]~y ~ ~h~ ]n~=] ~c~e-c!i~te ef the school.
If sound levels are too high, a wallmay need to be constructed.
1 ~ Desc~e ~e proposed project ~ ~ta~ ~ should provide an adequate ~sc~n of the s~e ~ tens of ultimate use wh~h
will result from the pmsed prcjecL Indicate if there are prcpoaed phases for development the extent of development to occur
~th each phase. and the anticipated coropletion of each increroent. Attach ad~t~nal sheet~ ~necessa~:
(See attached Feasibility Report.) Also, the overall project renovation
and newly constructed buildings will be phased with demolition and
construction of new parking lots and site util'ity improvements first.
Next, the school playfield and new classroom building and a new priest's
residence will be constructed to be completed in advance of the final
phase of constructing the new church. Also the offsite construction or
dedicated street widening will be sequenced durin~ the abovle steps as per
CalTrans Anticipated completion is by December 25, 2000, pending required
city approval process time.
13) Describe the sun~unding prcperties, including information on plants and aniroals and any cultuml. historical, or scenic aspects.
Indicate the type of land use (residential, coromercial. etc.), intensity of land use (one-family, apartmen~ houses. shops.
department stems. etc.) and scale of development (height. frontage. setback, rear yank, etc.):
(See attached Feasibility Report which describes these aspects. }
Vt4~thepmp~edpmjectchangethepattem~ca~e~rcharacter~fthe~un~undinggene~ama~fthepmject?
NO. The pattern nf ren-innal eomm~r~i=l ~na c~mmuni~y ~o~mere±al use.
already exists and without use compatibility issues arising from the
existing Catholic Church. This parklike setting will actually be a
welcome relief to the res. Ult of too many or too much commercial development
in one zone or neighborhood.
INITSTD1 .WPD- 4/96 Page 4 /4~ '~'
15) Indicate the type of short-term and long-term noise tO be generated. including soume and amount. How will these noise levels
affect adjacent properties and on-site uses. What methods of sound proofing are proposed?
Continuing church and school use not a factor.
· 1~ indicateproposedmmovalsand/ormplacementsofmammorscenic ~: See attached arborist's r,eport
and site tree map.) Basically the design of the site plan follows the
arborlst's recommendations. 90% of the existing onsite mature trees will
remain. Other specialty trees such as mature Date Fan Palms and Myrtles
will be relocated. Some American'Elms and Mulberry trees will be replanted.
17) indicate any bodies of water (including domestic water suPPlies) into which the site drains:
The site presently drains into
18] Indicate expected amount of water usage. (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification. please contact
the Cucamonga County W~aterDistrtct at 987-2591.
a. Residential (ga~/day) N/A Peak use (gaYDay) N/A
b. X~o~hmu~r ~(gal''day/ac) ~ ~] R peak use (gal/min/ac) 15oo
19) Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal. Septic Tank x~- ~ Sewer. If septic tanks am proposed, attach
percolation tests. If discharge to a sanitaO, sewage system is proposed it~Jibate expected daily sewage generation: [See
Attachment A for usage est~'nates). For further clarification. please contact the Cucamonga County Water Dist~ct at 987-2591.
a. Residential (gal/day) N/A
b. Za~Che~ci~Jx:tx(gal/day/ac) The existinq on site sewaqe dis~,osal system will be
abandoned. The new renovation includes underground
connection to existing Foothill Blvd. sewer system.
RESIDENTIAL PR T:
20) Number'of residential units:
~ Dftached (indicate range of parcel sizes.' minimum lot size and maximum lot Size:
(N/A) is church use -..
Attached (indicate whether units am rental or for sale units): · - N / A
21) Anticipated tange of sale prices ancYor mnts:
Sale Price(s) $ to
Rent (per month) $. to
22) Specifynumberofbedmomsbyunit.type:
23) Indicate anticipated household size by unit type: N/A
2,~) Indicate Ihe expected number of school children who will be residing within the project: Contact the appropriate School
Districts as shown in Attachment B:
a. Elemental7:
b. Junior High:
c. Senior High
COMMERCIAL. INDUSTRIAL AND INSTIT~ITIQNAI, PR~J~¢T,~
25) Describe type ~f use(s) and maj~r functi~n(s) ~f c~mmemia~ indust~a~ ~r instituti~na~ uses:
1200 - 1500 seat Catholic Church
K-8 Catholic church school
2~ ~1 ~or area of commemia~ ~dustria~ or ins~utional uses by type:
existing church 5,250 sq ft 8. existing ~uarters ~,~00 sq ft
~' n~w ~hllr~h ~R nnn ~q ~+ 9, ~+~ ~ccn Center ~._00 sq fl
3. rectory 2,'575 sq ft 10. ~'~ comm center 10,725 sq ft
4. ~am~n hlag 7.NNN ~q Ff ~ existin~ school b!dg 8.~50 sq ft
5. new rectory 2,500 sq ft 12. new school bldg. 7,500 sq ft
6. existing quarters 1,050 sq ft
7. existing garage* 440 sq ft * to be demolished
2~ In~catehou~ofope~n:
Church use: Saturday 4 pm - 8 pm School use: Mon-Fri 7 am - 6 pm
Sunday 7 am - 8 pm 10 mos per year
28) Numberof emplOyees: Total: N/A
Maximum Shift:
Time of Maximum Shift:
29) Provide breakdown of anticiPated j°b classificati°ns' including wage and salaO' ranges' as well as an indicati°n °f the rate
of hire for each classification (attach additional sheet if necessary):
N/A
30) Estimafion of the number of wo~ers to be himd that currentlY reside in the CitY:
N/A
· 31) For commemial and industrial uses only, indicate the soume, type and amount of airpollution emissions. (Date should be
vetfried through the South Coast Air Quality Management District, at (818) 572-6283):
N/A
32) Have the water, sewe6 fim,and ~d c~n#~ agencies serving the pmject been c~ntacted t~ detennine their abi~ity t~ pr~vide
adequate se~ce to me p~posed p~ect? If so, please ~dicate their response.
Yes.
The response resulting from the preliminary review by planning commission
and suDsequent meetings w~tn c~ty agencies an~ ~epartments ~na~cate a pos~ti'
respoD~ Rl~bn~mqh Rnm~ ]]fili~y im9ro~z~mpnf~ w~ll he m~p n~ry in ca~e o
dedicating and widening Foothill Blvd. along the property frontage.
IN|TSTD1 .VVPD - 4/96 Page 7
33) In the known history of this pmpen'y. has there been any use. storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials ?
Examples of hazardous and/ortoxic materials include, but are not limited to PCB's,' radioactive substances.' pesticides and
heroicides; fuels, oils, solvents, and other tlamreable liquids and gases. Also note underground storage of any of the above.
Please list the materials and describe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates of use, if
known.
~]0
34) Will the proposed project involve the temporary or long-term use, storage or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic
materials, including but not limited to those examples fisted above? If yes, provide an inventory of all such materials to be
used and pmposed method of disposal. The location of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be
shown and labeled on the application plans.
l~O
I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for
adequate evaluation of this project to the best of my ability, that the facts, statements, and information presented am true and
correct tot he best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be Submitted
before an adequate evaluation can be made by the City of Rancho~.
Date: / ~) -/?,/7 ~t ~ Signature: ~ .
Title.' Very .P, ev, St. ever~ C, Po~t. er
INITSTD1 .WPD - 4~96
City of Rancho Cucamonga
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
INITIAL STUDY PART II
BACKGROUND
1. Project File: Conditional Use Permit 99-56
2. Related Files: Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment 99-02 and Tree Removal
Permit 00-45.
3. Description of Project: The expansion of the existing Sacred Heart Church with Phase
one consisting of a new 20,000 square foot sanctuary building and Phase two consisting
of an additional 2,200 square feet of sanctuary space and 5,400 square feet of
additional classroom space on 11 acres of land in the Regional Related Commercial
district (Subarea 4) of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, located at 12704 Foothill
Boulevard - APN: 227-211-02, 24, 25 and 227-221-01 and 02.
4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address:
Sacred Heart Church and School
12704 Foothill Boulevard
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
5. General Plan Designation: Regional Related Commercial
6. Zoning: Regional Related Commercial (Subarea 4) Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan
7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The 11 -acre site is located on the north side of
Foothill Boulevard between the 1-15 Freeway and Etiwanda Avenue in Rancho
Cucamonga, California. The project site is located in the Regional Related Commercial
area of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. Across Foothill Boulevard to the south is
the Foothill Marketplace Shopping Center with which the Church shares it's main
signalized entry (Marketplace Drive). To the west and north lie vacant land and to the
east there are several scattered structures used for office and related uses. There is
also a makeshift junkyard to the east. The 1-15 Freeway and northbound on-ramp runs
along the northwest boundary of the site. The property to the northeast is zoned for
residential development.
8. Lead Agency Name and Address:
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Division
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
9. Contact Person and Phone Number:
Brent Le Count
(909) 477-2750
10. Other agencies whose approval is required: Permits to construct street
improvements and storm drain improvements on Foothill Boulevard from Caltrans.
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
CUP 99-56 Page 2
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving
at least one impact that is "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless
Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the
following pages.
I( ) Land Use and Planning ( ) Transportation/Circulation ( ) Public Services
( ) Population and Housing (x) Biological Resources ( ) Utilities and Service Systems
("/) Geological Problems ( ) Energy and Mineral Resources (,/) Aesthetics
('/) Water ( ) Hazards ( ) Cultural Resources
(',/) Air Quality (v') Noise ( ) Recreation
(,/) Mandatory Findings of Significance
DETERMINATION
Qn the basis of this initial evaluation:
(,/) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the
environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the
mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the
project, or agreed to, by the applicant. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
will be prepared.
Signed: /~ ,;2?dj ~"
Brent Le Count, AICP
Associate Planner
November 15, 2000
EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Pursuant to Section 15063 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, an
explanation is required for all "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact
Unless Mitigation Incorporated," and "Less Than Significant Impact" answers, including a
discussion of ways to mitigate the significant effects identified.
I I Potentially ~
Issues and Supporting Information Sources; significant
'lgr~icantMitigatio.Silgn~c~ntNo
1. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposah
a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? ( ) ( ) () (v')
b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or ( ) . ( ) ( ) (v')
policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction
over the project?
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
CUP 99-56 Page 3
c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
vicinity?
d) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an ( ) ( ) ( ) (¢)
established community?
Comments:
a-d) The Sacred Heart Church has occupied the site since 1958. The facilities are
arranged in a campus like fashion and include the main sanctuary building, a multi-
purpose building, an administration building, classrooms and playgrounds, and
three residences. These buildings will remain. The site also contains a small teen
center and garage building, both of which will be demolished. While old, neither
building has historic status. The new sanctuary will be built to the west of the
existing sanctuary, which will be converted to other church uses. The expansion is
not expected to conflict with existing or planned uses in the vicinity. The sanctuary
building will be located approximately 350 feet from the nearest residentially zoned
property. The building height is proposed to exceed code specified limits but this is
not expected to have a negative impact on the vicinity due to the commercial nature
of the area and the high quality architectural design of the sanctuary.
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant
POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal.'
a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local ) ( ) ( ) (,/)
population projections?
b) Induce substantial growth in an area either ) ( ) ( ) (,/)
directly or indirectly (e.g., through projects in an
undeveloped area or extension of major
infrastructure)?
c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/)
housing?
Comments:
a-b) Construction activities at the site will be short-term and will not attract new
employees to the area. The new sanctuary is not expected to attract a substantial
number of new residents to the area. The expansion is intended to serve the needs
of the existing community.
c) The site is already developed with church and school facilities. The new sanctuary
will be constructed in an area designated Regional Related Commercial (Subarea
4) of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. Commercial uses occur in the immediate
vicinity.
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
CUP 99-56 Page 4
Potentially ·
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: significant
Impact Less
Potentially Unless Than
Incorporated
3. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result in or
expose people to potential impacts involving:
a) Fault rupture? ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/)
b) Seismic ground shaking? ( ) ( ) (v') ( )
c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? ( ) ( ) (,/) ( )
d) Seiche hazards? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
e) Landslides or mudflows? ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/)
f) Erosion, changes in topography, or unstable soil ( ) ( ) ( ) (v)
conditions from excavation, grading, or fill?
g) Subsidence of the land? ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/)
h) Expansive soils? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v)
i) Unique geologic or physical features? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
Comments:
a-c) No known faults pass through the sit. It is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is it in
the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault. The Red
Hill Fault, or Etiwanda Avenue Fault, passes within 3.2 miles northwest of the site,
and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 4 miles north. These faults are
both capable of producing M,~ 6.0 - 7.0 earthquakes, respectively. Also, the San
Jacinto fault, capable of producing up to M~, 7.5 earthquakes, is 8 miles northeast of
the site and the San Andreas, capable of up to Mw 8.2 earthquakes, is 11.5 miles
northeast of the site. Each of these faults can produce strong ground shaking.
Adhering to recommendations presented in the report and the Uniform Building Code
will ensure that geologic impacts are less than significant.
d) The project site is not located near a body of water.
e) The site is relatively flat and is located in a commercial area adjacent to Foothill
Boulevard; therefore, the site is not susceptible to landslides or mudflows.
f) The topography will be minimally altered to accommodate the project for level
foundation but the area where the sanctuary is proposed is already graded and
paved for parking. Grading will be done in accordance with a grading plan
approved by the City Engineer. The impact is not considered significant as the site
is relatively flat with minimal grading required.
g-h) Soil type on-site and in the vicinity is Tujunga Delhi association. This soil type is
indicated to have potential limited bearing capacities. It is standard practice to
require a soils analysis prior to issuance of building permits. There is no evidence
of soil related structural problems inherent in the on-site buildings.
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
CUP 99-56 Page 5
i) The site contains no unique geologic or physical features.
Potentially
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: significant
4. WATER. Will the proposal result in:
a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, ( ) ( ) (x) ( )
or the rate and amount of surface water runoff?
b) Exposure of people or property to water related ( ) ( ) ( ) (./)
hazards such as flooding?
c) Discharge into surface water or other alteration ( ) ( ) ( ) (-/)
of surface water quality (e.g., temperature,
dissolved oxygen, or turbidity)?
d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
water body?
e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/)
of water movements?
f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either ( ) ( ) (,/)
through direct additions or withdrawals, or
through interception of an aquifer by cuts or
excavations, or through substantial loss of
groundwater recharge capability?
g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? ( ) ( ) (,/)
h) Impacts to groundwater quality? ( ) (v') ( )
i) Substantial reduction in the amount of ( ) ( ) (,/)
groundwater otherwise available for public water
supplies?
Comments:
a) The site is already developed with church facilities, school facilities, and a parking
area. The new sanctuary is proposed in an area now occupied by parking so the
increase in hard surface and runoff is therefore negligible. The increased flows can
be accommodated utilizing the existing drainage facilities in the area so long as
permission can be obtained from the Foothill Marketplace Shopping Center to the
south. Proper grading and drainage control per the above mitigation will ensure
this potential impact is less than significant.
b) The site is not located within the 100-year flood plain as indicated on Figure Ill-G/2
"Flood Hazards" in the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan EIR.
177
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
CUP 99-56 Page 6
c-e) The project site is not located near a body of water. Prior to issuance of a grading
permit, the applicant will provide a drainage study showing how storm water runoff
will be conveyed both during grading/construction and once the site is developed
and occupied.
h) The project does not entail use of hazardous substances. The only possible impact
to ground water would be from irrigation of landscaped areas and runoff from
parking areas but this is nominal and not out of the ordinary. There is no
anticipated impact.
f, g, ~ The project will not interfere with groundwater management practices in the area as
the site is not used for groundwater recharge.
Potentially
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant
Impact Less
Potenti~Jly Unless Than
5. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal.'
a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to ( ) (x) ( ) ( )
an existing or projected air quality violation?
b) ExpoSe sensitive receptors to pollutants? ( ) ( ) (,/) ( )
c) AFter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or ( ) ( ) ) (v')
cause any change in climate?
d) Create objectionable odors? ( ) ( ) ) (v)
Comments:
a) Potential impacts to air quality are consistent with the Public Health and Safety
Super-Element within the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. During grading,
fugitive dust (PM~o) will be generated. Any impact to air quality from generation of
fugitive dust can be mitigated by the following measures:
1) The areas of the site where raw soil is exposed shall be treated with
water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and
RWQCB) daily to reduce PM~0 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD
Rule 403.
2) Foothill Boulevard shall be swept according to a schedule established
by the City to reduce PM~0 emissions associated with vehicle tracking of
soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of
construction.
3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed
25 mph to minimize PM~0 emissions from the site during such episodes.
4) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be
applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96
hours or more to reduce PM~0 emissions.
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
CUP 99-56 Page 7
b) There are no sensitive receptors within ~,4 mile of the project site other than planned
residential land to the northeast and this is 350 feet away from the new sanctuary.
Vehicles entering and exiting the site will generate exhaust fumes but this is not
unlike other areas in town where commercial uses are near residential. Modern
vehicles have sophisticated anti-smog technology that greatly reduces vehicle
emissions. During construction, exhaust emissions from construction vehicles and
equipment and fugitive dust generated by vehicles and equipment traveling over
exposed surfaces may cause NOx and PM~o levels to exceed daily significant
thresholds. The following mitigation measures will ensure impacts will be at less
than significant levels.
1) The construction contractor shall select the construction equipment
used on-site based on low emission factors and high-energy efficiency.
The construction contractor shall ensure the construction grading plans
include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned and
maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications.
2) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel
powered equipment where feasible.
3) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading
plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when
not in use.
c-d) The proposed project is to construct a new church sanctuary building. Nothing
associated with the operation is expected to change air movement, moisture levels,
or odors. There is no impact.
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: significant
6. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. WOUld the
proposal result in:
a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? (v')
b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g., (v')
sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or
incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)?
c) inadequate emergency access or access to (v')
nearby uses?
d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? ( ) ( ) (,,')
e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? ( ) ( ) (,/)
f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting ( ) ( ) (,/)
alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts,
bicycle racks)?
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
CUP 99-56 Page 8
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant
g) Rail or air traffic impacts? ( ) ) ( ) (v')
Comments:
a) The project will increase traffic trips as the new sanctua~ ~s considerably larger
than the existing sanctua~. However, the prima~ traffic will be on Sundays during
church se~ices. On-site traffic circulation is designed to avoid stacking of vehicles
entering the site on Foothill Boulevard. The impact is not considered significant.
b-d) Access to the site is provided primarily by the existing signalized ent~ drive shared
with the Foothill Marketplace to the south. A second access point is proposed west
of the main ent~ that will sere both the site and the small triangular parcel to the
west.
The project will make its contribution to the frontage improvements and provide
appropriate documentation to Caltrans relative to the driveway on Foothill
Boulevard. With these improvements, the project related traffic will be adequately
managed and accommodated.
e) The project will have a gated ent~ off of Foothill Boulevard but there is adequate
stacking room behind the gate and provision for turn around without having to go
through the gate. Bike lane improvements will be provided along the Foothill
Boulevard frontage.
f) The church will be dedicating land along the Foothill Boulevard frontage for a
deceleration/bus lane.
g) Located approximately 6 miles noaheast of Ontario Airpo~, the site is offset noah
of the flight path and will not be dangerous to users or aircraft.
Issues and Suppoding Information Sources: ~gnific~t
7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal
result in impacts to:
a) Endangered, threatened, or rare species or their ( ) ( ) 0 (~)
habitats (including, but not limited to: plants,
fish, insects, animals, and birds)?
b) Locally designated species (e.g., heritage trees, ( ) (x) ( ) ( )
eucalyptus windrow, etc.)?
c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g., ( ) ( ) ( ) (~)
eucalyptus grove, sage scrub habitat, etc.)?
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
CUP 99-56 Page 9
Potentially] ]
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: significant
d) Wetland habitat (e.g., marsh, riparian, and ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
vernal pool)?
e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/)
Comments:
a) The site has been occupied by the church facilities since 1958. No natural habitat
is known to exist onsite and the property is not within the Ontario Recovery Unit, as
indicated in Figure 6 of the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Final Recovery Plan for the
Delhi Sands Flower-loving Fly habitat. On-site vegetation consists of non-native
species associated with the church's landscaping. It is unlikely that any DSF will
move onto the site due to the lack of natural habitat.
b-c) The site contains a number of mature trees including a remnant Eucalyptus
windrow along the Foothill Boulevard frontage. Most of the trees will be removed to
accommodate the proposed improvements with the exception of the majority of
trees surrounding the existing sanctuary building, which will remain. The mature
trees shall be replaced with appropriate species of the largest available
nursery grown trees in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Tree
Preservation Ordinance. With mitigation, the impact is not considered significant.
d) There is no riparian or wetland habitat on-site.
e) The presence of bordering commercial development within the area including the
1-15 Freeway (a significant barrier) has eliminated any wildlife corridors that may
have occurred in the distant past.
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: significant
8o ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the
proposal.'
a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation ( ) ( ) ( ) (-/)
plans?
b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/)
inefficient manner?
c) Result in the loss of availability of a known ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/)
mineral resource that would be of future value to
the region and the residents of the State?
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
CUP 99-56 Page 10
Comments:
a-b) The project will be required to conform to applicable City standards for energy
conservation.
c) The project site is located on the Day Creek alluvial fan, an area classified as a
Mineral Resource Zone (MRZ-2). An MRZ-2 zone contains deposits of known
value and marketability; however, the State Geologist has determined that the area
is not a Designated Area of available resources due to urbanization.
Potentially
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant
9. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve:
a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of ( ) ( ) (x)
hazardous substances (including, but not limited
to: oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation)?
b) Possible interference with an emergency ( ) ( ) (,,')
response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
c) The creation of any health hazard or potential ( ) ( ) (x)
health hazard?
d) Exposure of people to existing sources of ( ) ( ) (,/)
potential health hazards?
e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable ( ) ( ) (v')
brush, grass, or trees?
Comments:
a, c) The proposed project does not include the use of any hazardous materials such as
oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation.
b) The proposed project includes adequate provisions for emergency response
vehicles. The site will be graded and landscaped in accordance with approved
plans.
d) No evidence of discarded drums, containers, hazardous wastes, or discolored soils
were observed on-site. There was no indication of underground storage tanks or
illegal dumping of refuse on-site.
e) The site is not located within a known fire hazard area.
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
CUP 99-56 Page 11
Potentially
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: sig.i,c~.t
10. NOISE. Will the proposal result in:
a) Increases in existing noise levels? ( ) ( ) (,/) ( )
b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
Comments:
a) The project will increase noise levels since it entails expansion of existing church
facilities, thus adding people and traffic to the area. Noise will be consistent with
existing levels, which includes traffic noise from the existing chumh as well as
Foothill Boulevard and the I-15 Freeway.
b) The site is subject to traffic noise from the 1-15 Freeway. The only sensitive
receptor is an existing playground near the center of the site. However, this is an
existing condition and no increase in student enrollment is proposed as part of the
project. Freeway noise reaching the proposed sanctuary building will be mitigated
by the walls and windows of the building. The impact is not considered significant.
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: significant
.,,,.,o. s,;;7,
11. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an
effect upon or result in a need for new or altered
government services in any of the following areas:
a) Fire protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (¢)
b) Police protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
c) Schools? ( ) ( ) ( ) (./)
d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? ( ) ( ) ( ) (¢)
e) Other governmental services? ( ) ( ) ( ) (¢)
Comments:
a-e) Fire Protection - The site is located on north side of Foothill Boulevard in Rancho
Cucamonga and is served by a fire station located on the southwest corner of
Jersey and Milliken, approximately 5.0 miles southwest of the project site.
Standard conditions of approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes will be
placed on the project so no impacts to fire services will occur.
Police Protection - Additional police protection is not required as the project
proposes an expansion of existing operations.
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
CUP 99-56 Page 12
Schools - The proposed construction activities will not generate a substantial
number of new job opportunities or induce people to move to the project area;
therefore, construction activities will not adversely impact local schools.
Parks - Proposed construction activities will not generate a substantial number of
new job opportunities or induce people to move to the project area. Employees will
likely be hired from within the City or surrounding communities; therefore,
construction of the project will not adversely impact local parks or recreational
opportunities.
Public facilities, - The project site is surrounded by vacant land and other
commercial uses. The project will utilize existing facilities within the currently
developed vicinity.
Issues and Supporting Information Sources:
Impact Less
12. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the
proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies
or substantial alterations to the following utilities:
a) Power or natural gas? ) ( ) ( ) (v')
b) Communication systems? ) ( ) ( ) (v')
c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution ) ( ) ( ) (v')
facilities?
d) Sewer or septic tanks? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
e) Storm water drainage? ( ) ( ) ( )
f) Solid waste disposal? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
g) Local or regional water supplies? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
Comments;
a-g) The project will use existing gas, electrical, and communication systems. Solid
waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler. The project
may increase demand upon storm drain systems due to the potential for increased
runoff from new hardscape proposed, but the increase is nominal because the site
is already developed with substantial areas of hardscape. The project may rely on
existing storm drain improvements in the area if approval can be obtained from the
Foothill Marketplace Shopping Center to the south. This does not result in
substantial alterations to the master plan of storm drainage. The impact is not
considered significant since it can be mitigated by providing proper storm water
drainage per approved grading and drainage plan.
initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
CUP 99-56 Page 13
Potentially
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: significant
13. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal.'
a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? ( ( ) ( (,/)
b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? ( ( ) ( (v')
c) Create light or glare? ( ( ) (x) ( )
Comments:
a) The project site is located along Foothill Boulevard and will be visible from the 1-15
Freeway. The City of Rancho Cucamonga considers Foothill Boulevard the most
significant commercial corridor in the City. The street is the major east/west
commercial thoroughfare and is an important part of the developing regional
business area. The Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan was developed to provide a
balanced and unified pattern of development along Foothill Boulevard. The
proposed project will be constructed in accordance with design guidelines set forth
in the Specific Plan. The project is of a very tasteful design with high quality
architectural features on all sides. The building will have a high quality appearance
as viewed from the I-15 Freeway.
b) The proposed design and exterior elements of the new sanctuary building will be
consistent with design standards set forth in the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan
and City-wide design policies.
c) The project will create new light and glare because new and upgraded lighting will
be installed. The design and placement of light fixtures will be shown on site plans,
which require review for consistency with City standards. The project lighting
shall be designed to avoid casting glare or undue levels of illumination on
surrounding property and Foothill Boulevard through the use of creative
lighting locations, directing light downwards/away from residence, and
opaque screens. With mitigation, the impact is not considered significant.
Issues arid Supporting Information Sources: significant
Silgr~i~c~nt Mitigation Significa,'lt NO
14. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal.'
a) Disturb Paleontological resources? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v")
b) Disturb archaeological resources? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
c) Affect historical or cultural resources? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
CUP 99-56 Page 14
Potentially
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant
d) Have the potential to cause a physical change, ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/)
which would affect unique ethnic cultural
values?
e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/)
the potential impact area?
Comments:
a-e) The site is on an alluvial fan, an environment not generally associated with fossils.
The site has been occupied by the church since 1958 and most of the existing
structures will remain in place. Those structures proposed for demolition to
accommodate the project are not considered historical resources; therefore, the
likelihood of affecting historical or cultural resources is minimal and impacts are not
considered significant.
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: significant
15. RECREATION. WOUld the proposal:
a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
regional parks or other recreational facilities?
b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/)
Comments:
a) An increased demand for neighborhood or regional parks is unlikely due to the
nature of the use (church/religious services) and its not likely to have a growth
inducing impact that will lead to long term over demand on parks.
b) The proposed project will not affect existing recreational opporlunities, as it does not
displace land designated for park development. The project will have no impacts to
recreational facilities.
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
CUP 99-56 Page 15
Potentially
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: significant
16. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.
a) Potential to degrade: Does the project have ( ) ( ) ( )
the potential to degrade the quality of the
environment, substantially reduce the habitat of
a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self-sustaining levels,
threaten td eliminate a plant or animal
community, reduce the number or restrict the
range of a rare or endangered plant or animal,
or eliminate important examples of the major
periods of California history or prehistory?
b) Short term: Does the project have the potential ( ) (,/) ( ) ( )
to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of
long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term
impact on the environment is one which occurs
in a relatively brief, definitive period of time.
Long-term impacts will endure well into the -
future.)
c) Cumulative.' Does the project have impacts that ( ) ( ) (,/) ( )
are individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable"
means that the incremental effects of a project
are considerable when viewed in connection
with the effects of past projects, the effects of
other current projects, and the effects of
probable future projects.)
d) Substantial adverse: Does the project have ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
environmental effects, which will cause
substantial adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
Comments:
a) The Initial Study did not identify any significant adverse ~mpacts to biological
resources. The vegetation on-site is composed mainly of non-native species
associated with church landscaping. The site does not contain appropriate habitat
for any listed endangered or threatened species as indicated in a Delhi Sands
Flower-loving Fly Habitat Evaluation Report.
b) The project does not sacrifice long term environmental goals to achieve short term
environmental objectives. Short term impacts identified in the Initial Study are
related to grading and construction which can be mitigated to less than significant
levels.
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
CUP 99-56 Page 16
c) The project is part of the inevitable cumulative effect on the environment caused by
regional growth in general, and the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan in particular.
The site has already been included in the City's General Plan as a commercial site
and has been occupied by the church since 1958; therefore approval of the project
does not cause a cumulative impact not already considered.
d) Development of the Sacred Heart Church sanctuary building will not cause
substantial adverse effects on humans, either directly or indirectly. The initial study
identified impacts to air quality as having a potentially significant affect to the
environment. However, proposed mitigation measures will reduce the impacts to
less than significant.
EARLIER ANALYSES
Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA
process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative
Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within
the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to
applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on
the earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study
and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500
Civic Center Drive (check all that apply):
(v') City of Rancho Cucam0nga General Plan EIR
(Certified April 6, 1981 )
Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update
(SCH #88020115, certified January 4, 1989)
APPLICANT CERTIFICATION
I certify that I am the applicant for the project described in this Initial Study. I acknowledge that I
have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures. Further, I have revised the
project plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid
the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant environmental effects
would occur.
Signature: I ate: , ~
...... .... 0
Print Name and Title: A F'~.i'~ i7~,'7" C, , P~PW~
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
Regular Meeting
December 13, 2000
Chairman McNiel called the Regular Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning
Commission to order at 7:12 p.m. The meeting was held in the Council Chamber at Rancho
Cucamonga Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California.
ROLL CALL
COMMISSIONERS: PRESENT: Rich Macias, John Mannedno, Larry McNiel, Pam Stewart, Peter
Tolstoy
ABSENT: None
STAFF PRESENT: Brad Buffer, City Planner; Dan Coleman, Principal Planner; Kevin Ennis,
Assistant City Attorney; Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer; Brent Le Count,
Associate Planner; Lois Schrader, Planning Secretary; Kirt Coury, Associate
Planner; Rudy Zeledon, Assistant Planner.
ANNOUNCEMENTS
Chairman McNiel noted that Items "A" and "B" would be heard together since they pertain to the
same property and that Items "C" and "D" would also be heard together for the same reason.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Motion: Moved by Stewart, seconded by Macias, carried 5-0, to approve the minutes of November
8, 2000.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. ENVIRONMENTALASSESSMENTAND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT99-50-VANTIGER-A
request to develop a 5, 130 square foot service station with convenience market, ddve-thru fast
food restaurant and a drive-thru self-serve car wash on 2 acres of land in the Community
Commercial District (Subarea 4) of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, located at the
northeast comer of Etiwanda Avenue and Foothill Boulevard - APN: 1100-161-002. Related
file: Variance 00-02. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for
consideration.
'xt// lr
Planning Commission Minutes -1- December 13, 2000
B. VARIANCE 00-02 - VANTIGER - A request to reduce the required parking setback from 35
feet to 25 feet along Etiwanda Avenue to accommodate a 5,130 square foot service station with
convenience market, drive-thru fast food restaurant, and a self-serve car wash on 2 acres of
land in the Community Commercial District (Subarea 4) of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan,
located at the northeast corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Foothill Boulevard -
APN: 1100-161-002. Related file: Conditional Use Permit 99-50.
Brent Le Count, Associate Planner, gave the staff report and noted that the resolutions had been
amended with conditions related to master plan storm drain improvements, and that the
Commissioners had been provided with copies of the amended resolutions for their review. He also
noted that the applicant has refuted the conditions and has asked to pay in-lieu fees.
Commissioner Tolstoy asked about a historic plaque for the property.
Dan Coleman, Principal Planner, noted that placement of a plaque is in the resolution shown on
Page A-54 of the agenda packet in the "Cultural Resources" section.
Chairman McNiel opened the public hearing.
Barry Vantiger, 2177 N. 1 st Avenue, Upland, stated he is the applicant. He expressed his thanks to
staff for their assistance with the project and he thanked Chairman McNiel and Commissioner
Stewart for their help in Design Review. Mr. Vantiger requested, for the record, to appeal the
requirement for the storm drain improvements, citing the prohibitive cost of the work.
Commissioner Mannerino asked if the Planning Commission even has the authority to repeal those
requirements.
Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer, stated that regarding projects located in the San Sevaine area, in
1989-1990 the City Council adopted a policy, which directs such storm drain improvements to be
made and that it is a directive from the City Council. Mr. James clarified that the applicant will
appeal those requirements.
Chairman McNiel asked if the applicant was present and if there were any comments.
Mr. Vantiger explained his belief that alternative measures that are more beneficial to the City and
that are less costly are possible and that he would like to work on those alternatives with staff.
Kevin Ennis, Assistant City Attorney, stated that this body, the Planning Commission, a subservient
body, could not waive a directive from the City Council and only the Council can waive the policy.
Jim Frost, announced that he is the former Chairman of the Etiwanda Specific Plan Advisory
Committee and that he also served on the first General Plan Committee. He noted that it was
always the direction during his participation with these groups that it was the Cib/s direction to make
it easier for development, not more difficult. Mr. Frost noted that he believes we are trying to place
too much development on the property. He stated he did not feel this project made sense, citing
problems with access from Foothill Boulevard and the future development on all four comers of the
intersection. He felt we could do better.
Chairman McNiel closed the public hearing.
Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer, explained the proposed changes beginning on Pages 52 and 53
A & B. He stated that under the Engineering Division heading, Condition #7and ~9 are to be
deleted, and under Environmental Mitigation-Water, #1 is to be deleted. He stated that new wording
Planning Commission Minutes -2- December 13, 2000
regarding drainage has been added as numbers 1,2, & 3 underwater Mitigation, which relate to the
installation of a master plan drainage facility and the requirement for retention and reimbursement of
the fee credits within the drainage area.
Commissioner Tolstoy asked for comment from Commissioner Stewart and Chairman McNiel who
served on the Design Review Committee for the project in regard to the possibility of the project
being "overbuilt."
Chairman McNiel commented that he did not feel the project is overbuilt, as indicated by Mr. Frost.
Commissioner Stewart added that overbuilding was an initial concern, but after more than one
review and a reconfiguration, they determined that the project is workable.
Commissioner Tolstoy asked them if they felt the issues had been resolved to their satisfaction.
Commissioner Stewart indicated that the issues had been resolved.
Chairman McNiel agreed.
Brad Buller, City Planner, noted that in the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, in areas designated as
"Activity Centers," moving uses close to the street/intersection is encouraged, but because of the
facility and the use with drive-thru's, two different precedents have been set for corner treatments in
this intersection. He interjected that Mr. Frost raised a good point that needed clarification. He
remarked that the challenge will be how it is addressed when applications for the remaining 2
corners are submitted for development. He indicated that the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan would
normally direct them to place the building up at the street similar to how the odginal gas station was
situated on the property. He added that in Design Review, they worked on the plan and came up
with an alternative. He commented that the rock elements make a handsome corner treatment.
Chairman McNiel agreed.
Commissioner Tolstoy added that it is similar to the comer of Carnelian Avenue and Foothill
Boulevard and an example of good planning.
Motion: Moved by Tolstoy, seconded by Stewart, to issue a Negative Declaration of Environmental
Impacts and approve Conditional Use Permit 99-50 with the amended conditions noted and
Vadance 00-02 by adoption of the Resolutions of Approval. Motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: MACIAS, MANNERINO, MCNIEL, STEWART, TOLSTOY
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE - carded
C. FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 99-02 - SACRED HEART
CHURCH - A request to amend the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan to allow churches subject
to a Conditional Use Permit within the Regional Commercial land use designation (Subarea 4)
and to increase the allowable building height for churches. Related files: Conditional Use
Permit 99-56, Tree Removal Permit 00-45, and Preliminary Application Review 98-12.
D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 99-56 - SACRED
HEART CHURCH - The expansion of the existing Sacred Heart Church with Phase one
consisting of a new 20,000 square foot sanctuary building and Phase two consisting of an
additional 2,200 square feet of sanctuary space and 5,400 square feet of add itional classroom
space on 11 acres of land in the Regional Related Commercial district (Subarea 4) of the
Planning Commission Minutes -3- December 13, 2000
Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, located at 12704 Foothill Boulevard -APN: 227-211-02, 24,
and 25 and 227-221-01 and 02. Related files: Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment
99-02 and Tree Removal Permit 00-45. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of
environmental impacts for consideration.
Brent Le Count, Associate Planner, gave the staff report.
Commissioner Mannerino asked who determines the "buffer zone" between the development and
the residential area.
Mr. Le Count replied that staff is recommending a 300-foot buffer between the project and the
residential area.
Commissioner Tolstoy asked what is planned for the triangular shaped piece of properly just west of
the church.
Mr. Le Count stated he did not know specifically how the property would be developed and that it
could possibly be developed with a commercial use.
Commissioner Tolstoy asked if access to that property would be difficult.
Mr. Le Count replied that the access is typical for the area and that the project uses an efficient
design solution.
Chairman McNiel opened the public hearing and asked if the applicant was present.
Father Steve Porter, representing Sacred Head Church, 12704 Foothill Boulevard, indicated that he
had read and agreed with all of the Conditions of Approval.
Headng no further comment, Chairman McNiel closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Tolstoy indicated that he would like to hear the comments of the owner of the
triangular property to the west in regard to the church expansion.
Brad Buller, City Planner, stated that he had been in contact with the owner of the properly and that
they had discussed the development possibilities. He noted that because of the close proximity to
the on-ramp for I-15, a driveway along the frontage of the property on Foothill would not be a good
idea and the challenge is to provide something that works for both the church and a possible use for
the adjacent triangular propedy~ He mentioned that the owner intends to pursue a freeway service
type of business. He added that access to the property should be provided with this Master Plan.
Commissioner Tolstoy asked if the church would be interested in acquiring the property.
Mr. Buller indicated that the owner of the property is not interested in selling it right now and that the
church really does not need it.
Chairman McNiel voiced his support for the project noting that the architecture maintains a historic
flavor in design and expressed his approval in that the church decided not to move to another
location.
Motion: Moved by Stewart, seconded by Mannerino, to recommend approval for Foothill Boulevard
Specific Plan Amendment 99-02 to be forwarded to City Council for final action and to issue a
Negative Declaration of Environmental Impacts and to approve Conditional Use Permit 99-56 as
amended. Motion carried by the following vote:
Planning Commission Minutes -4- December 13, 2000
AYES: MACIAS, MANNERiNO, MCNIEL, STEWART, TOLSTOY
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE - carried
Mr. Buller commended the applicant and their architect for an excellent job, a thorough analysis of
the site, and a great model of the project. He noted that the project will be an asset to the
community.
Chairman McNiel commented that the applicants were a pleasure to work with in design review.
Commissioner Tolstoy also complimented the architect for his great exhibit and commended them
for their resolve to stay on the property.
The Planning Commission recessed for a 5-minute break at 7:40 p.m. to accommodate a mass
exodus of students from the room.
The Planning Commission returned from their break at 7:45 p.m.
E. DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 00-04 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -
to amend vadous residential sections of the Development Code pertaining to roofing r
Brad Buller, City Planner, gave the presentation noting that the amendment is I :y
regarding the materials used and to address the issue of aesthetics to be on new and
replacement residential roofs. Henotedthatthequalityofthematedalsused~ sameand
will be consistent with the current Building and Fire Code requirements.
Commissioner Mannerino asked if an imitation of wood shingle of an acceptable material
would be allowed. He noted that the language used in the list of materials notes "tile,
slate, copper or imitation thereof," and shake is not include He wanted to know if a
"woodlike" tile that looks like wood shake could be suitable retardant.
Chairman McNiel noted that there are lightweight tile other roofs that simulate a shake
roof.
Mr. Buller replied that simulated material ~ and that it was not meant to prohibit
that.
Chairman McNiel closed the
Motion: Moved b~ , Macias, to recommend approval of Development Code
Amendment 00-04 as to be forwarded to the City Council for final action. Motion
carried by the following vote:
AYES: MACIAS. MCNIEL, STEWART, TOLSTOY
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE - carried
F. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 00-40 -ARROW &UTICA
LLC - The development of a 27,018 square foot industrial building on 1.7'2 acres
~e General Industrial District (Subarea 8), located at the southeast corner of
Commission Minutes -5- Decamber 13, 2000
,'
RESOLUTION NO. 00-133
· A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CiTY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF
FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 99-02, TO ALLOW
CHURCHES SUBJECT TO A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT WITHIN THE
REGIONAL COMMERCIAL LAND USE DESIGNATION (SUBAREA 4) OF
THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN, AND TO INCREASE THE
ALLOWABLE BUILDING HEIGHT FOR CHURCHES, AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF.
A. .Recitals.
1. Sacred Heart Church and School filed an application for Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan
Amendment 99-02 as described in the title of this Resolution and the attached Exhibit "A".
Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development DistAct Amendment is referred to as "the
application."
2. On December 13, 2000, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date.
3. All legal prerequisites pdor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above:
referenced public hearing on December 13, 2000, including written and oral staff reports, together
with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to Subarea 4 which is generally located along Foothill
Boulevard, east of the 1-15 Freeway.
b. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Pojicies of the General Plan
and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan
and with related development; and
c. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element
in that it fosters a mix of different but compatible Uses and activities in the area, provides cultural and
religious services, avoids the creation of nuisances among adjacent land uses, and provides for
regionally odented land use in close proximity to the regional transportation network; and
d. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent
properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding
properties.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 09-133
FBSPA 99-02 - SACRED HEART CHURCH AND SCHOOL
December 13, 2000
Page 2
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dudng the above-
referenced public headng and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2
above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as followS:
a. That Subarea 4 of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan is suitable for the uses
permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in
the surrounding area; and
b. That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the
environment nor the surrounding properties; and
c. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this
Commission hereby recommends approval of Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment 99-02 as
noted on the attached Exhibits "A."
· 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2000.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY: ~.~ ~~ I'arry ~cN]el, Chairman
ATTEST: ,
I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucemonga, do hereby
certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission held on the 13th day of December, 2000, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MACIAS, MANNERINO, MCNIEL, STEWART, TOLSTOY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ORDINANCE NO. ~:~ -~ ~.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANGHO
CUGAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING FOOTHILL BOULEVARD
SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 99-02, AMENDING THE
DEVELOPMENT CODE, CHAPTER 17.32 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD
DISTRICTS, TO ALLOW CHURCHES SUBJECT TO A CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT WITHIN THE REGIONAL COMMERCIAL LAND USE
DESIGNATION (SUBAREA 4) AND TO INCREASE THE ALLOWABLE
BUILDING HEIGHT FOR CHURCHES, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN
SUPPORT THEREOF.
A. Recitals.
1. Sacred Heart Church filed an application for Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan
Amendment 99-02 as described in the title of this Ordinance. Hereinafter in this Ordinance, the
subject Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment is referred to as the "application."
2. On the 13th day of December 2000, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and, following the
conclusion of said public hearing, adopted Resolution No. 00-133, thereby, recommending to
this City Council that said application be approved.
3. On the 7th day of February 2001, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application.
4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.
B. Ordinance
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part
"A," of this Ordinance are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-
referenced public hearing on February 7, 2001, including written and oral staff reports, together
with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General
Plan; and
b. This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element
and the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan; and
c. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the
adjacent propedies and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the
surrounding propedies; and
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-
referenced pubic hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2
above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows:
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO.
FBSPA 99-02 - SACRED HEART CHURCH
February 7, 2001 -'
Page 2
a. That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the
environment nor the surrounding prOpedies; and
b. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan.
4. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby finds that the project has
been prepared and reviewed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of
1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, and further, specifically finds
that based upon substantial evidence, it can be seen with certainty that the proposed Ordinance
is exempt pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15061 (b)(3).
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4
above, this Council hereby approves Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment 99-02, to
modify the Development Code Chapter 17.32 Foothill Boulevard Districts to allow churches as a
conditionally permitted use in the Regional Commercial land use district (Subarea 4) and to
increase the allowable building height for churches as shown on the attached Exhibit "A," as
well as any related text, tables, figures, and maps to maintain consistency.
6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance.
Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.32. 030
E. Utility (FB/U). Quasi-public land uses are typically associated with public activities. Quasi-public
land uses typically consist of civic functions such a public administrative offices, museums,
libraries, and meeting halls/neighborhood centers. Quasi-public activities are also associated
with public utility administrative offices and functions.
F. Public (FB/P), Public land uses are typically associated with public transportation facilities and
rights of way.
Section 17.32.030 - Use Regulations
Uses listed in Table 17,32,030 shall be allowable in one or more of the Foothill Boulevard Districts as
indicated in the columns beneath each district subarea. Where indicated with the letter "P," the use
shall be a permitted use in that district. Where indicated with the letter "C," the use shall be a
conditionally permitted use subject to the Conditional Use Permit process. In the event there is difficulty
in categorizing a given use in one of the districts, the procedure outlined in Section 17.02,040 shall be
followed.
A. Permitted Uses. Permitted uses are those land uses allowed in a given subarea subject to the
development regulations of the Development Code.
B. Conditionally Permitted Uses. Conditionally permitted uses, because of their unusual site
development requirements or unique operating characteristics, are subject to the granting of a
Conditional Use Permit by the Planning Commission or City Planner. Projects requiring a
Conditional Use Permit shall be required to comply with the regulations of Section 17.04.030.
In addition to the public hearing and notification requirements of Section 17.02.110, additional
notification of all property owners within the Foothill Boulevard subarea in which the property
under review is located is required.
Table 17.32.030 - Use Regulations for Foothill Boulevard Districts
Summary Table of Permitted (P) and Conditionally Permitted (C) Uses
Subarea One Subarea Two Subarea Three Subarea Four
tETAIL COMMERCIAL USES o
SC CC O MR P SC CC O MR ~4HR[ SC CC CO LMR MR U MU CC RRC MR LI2
Antique Shop<s P P P P P P p1 p p
Apparel
a) Boutjques P P P P P P P P P
b) General P P P P P P P P
Appliance Sto~s and Repair P P P P P
Art. Music, photographic Studios P P P P P P P p p p4 C
and Supply Stores
Auto Sen/ice Station C C C C C C C C C
~.uto Sennce (leduding falter6, '
motorcycles, boats, campers):
a) Sales (with andflaW repair p p p P C
fadlities)
~ Refer to Supam 4 Sec~on 17.32.080.F.7.b. (footnote 2).
2 All industrial uses and development standards shall be as provided in Subarea 7 of Chapter 17.30.
3 Subject to Master Plan requirements pursuant to 17.32.030.D.
4 CommerdaVOffice uses may be located in the RRC district only with the Concurrent development of one major region~lly related anchor business Of at least 15.000 square
feet per site Or project. This Fortsion is intended to tsdlitete the development Of large, rsgionally related uses. Regionally Related COmmercial uses are typified by large
scale businesses whiel~ serve a market area significantly larger than those businesses which draw CUstomers primarily to3m the neighborhood or COmmunity iavel.
17.32-10 6/99
Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17. 32. 030
Subarea One Subarea Two Subarea Three Subarea Four
RETAIL COMMERCIAL USES
SC CC O MR P SC CC O MR MHR SC CC CO LMR MR U MU CC RRC MR LI2 O
b) Rentals p p p p p p
;) Minor Repair (does not include
major engine work, muffler
P P P P P
shops, painting, body work,
upholsteW, etc.)
~) Coin-op Washing C C C
e) Automatic Washing C C C C
Parts and Suppries P P P P P
Bakedes (retail only) P P P P P P P P P P
Barber and Beauty Shops P P P P P P P P P P P p4 p
Bed and Breakfast C C C C C C C C C
Bicycle Shops p p p p p p p ~4
Blueprint and Photocopy SenAces P P P P P P P P P
Book, Gift and Stationery Stores P P P P P P P P P P P P C
[other than adult related matedaD
Gandy and Contectionedes p p p p p p p p p ~4
U, atedng Establishments P P P P P P P P P
;hina and Glassware Stores p p p p p p p p4
3hutches C C C C C C C C C C C C C ~// C C
Establishments
;ocktail Lounge(par, lounge, C
:avere) including related C C C C C C C C C C C
nteaainment
3ommerdal Recreational:
a) Indoor uses such as bowling p p p p p p p p p p p
and billiards
~) Outdoor uses such as tennis C C C C C C C C C
and basketball
3onvalescent Facilities & Hospitals P P P P P P P P P P P P P
;urtain and Drapery Shops P P P P P P P
:]ay Care Centers C C C C C C C C C C C C C C
}elicatessens and Spedagy Food p p p p p p p p p p4
Stores
Dru,q S ores and Pharmades
a) over 10,000 square feet p p p p p p
b) Pharmades with or without
spedally retail under 10,000 C P C P C P P P
square feet
Refer to Subarea 4 Section 17.32.080.F.7.b. (footnote 2).
All industrial uses and development standards shall be as provided in Subarea 7 of Chapter 17.30.
Subjed to Master Plan requirements pursuant to 17.32.030. D.
C~mmercia~/~~toe uses may be~~cated in the RRC distoct~n~y with the c~ncurrent devel~pment~f~ne major regionally related anchor business ofat least t5,000 square
feet par site or project. This provision is intended to fadlitate toe development of large, regionally related uses. Regionatly Related Commerdal uses are typffied by targe
17.32-11 6/99
Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17. 32. 030
Subarea One Subarea Two SC Subarea Three Subarea Four
RETAIL COMMERCIAL USES
SC CC O MR P SC CC O MR MHR CC CO LMR MR U MU CC I RRC I MR LI2 O
Electronics Sales and Se~ce p p p p p p
TVS, Stereos, radios, computers)
Parochial, Pri~ate (including Colleges C
and universities)
:armera' Markets P P P P P
:loo~ Covering Shops P P P P P
=torist Shops P P P P P P P P P P P P P
:umiture Stores P P P P P P P P
-tardware Stores P P P P P
-tealth and Athletic Gyms and C P C P C P C P P p4 p
,'/eight Redudng Clinics
-~obby Shops P P P P P P p p4
ce Cream Stores and SOda p4
Janitorial SenriCes and Supplies P P P p p4 C
Laundry (Self Senrice) P P P P P
Leather Goods and Luggage Stores ' P P P P P P P P
Refer to Subarea 4 Sec~on 17.32.080.F.7.b. (footnote 2).
2 AJl industrial uses and development standards shall be as provided in Subarea 7 of Chapter 17.30.
3 Subject to Master Plan requirements pursuant to 17.32.030.D.
4 Comme~ciav~ceus~smayba~catOdintheRRCdistrict~nh/w/ththec~ncurrentdeve~pment~f~nem~j~rregi~na~yre~atedanch~rbusinessdat~e~st15~squam
feet per site cr project. This provision is intended to tadlitate the development of large, regionally related uses. Regionally Related Commerdai usel am typified by large
scale basirmsses which serve a market area significantly Jarget than those businesses which draw CUstomers primarily from the neighedmood or community taveL
17.32-12 6/99
Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.32.030
Subarea One Subarea Two Subam Throe Subarea Four
RETAIL COMMERCIAL USES
SC CC 0 MR' P SC CC O MR MHR SC CC CO .MR MR U MU CC ~RC MR LI2 O
Parks and Recreation Fadlities, C
public and private
Pet Shops P P P P P P p p4
Photocopy (Xerox) P P P P P P p p4
Political or Philanthropic C
Headquarters
Public and Pdvate Clubs and
Lodges, including YMCA, YWCA, C
and similar Youth Group Uses
Record and Tape Stores P P P P P P P P P
Recreational Vehicle Storage Yards C
Restaurants (sit down):
a) with entertainment and/or C C C C C C C C C C C
cocktail lounge, bar
b) incidental eerv~ng of beer and
wine {without a cocktaiI lounge, p p p p p p p p p p p P P
bar, entertainment or dancing)
c) cefd, limited to 20 seats
(including outdoor seating) P P P P P P P P P P P P P
d) Fast Food: With drive~hru C C C C C C
W~out drive-thtu P P P P P P P P P
Shoe Stores and Repair Shops P P P P P P P P P P
Specialty Retail P P P P P P P
a) SpedaRy: Backbacking, Tennis,
Refer to Subarea 4 S6c~on 17.32.080.F.7.b. (foomote 2).
All indusbial uses and development standards shall ha as providsd in Subarea 7 of Chapter 17.30.
Subject to Master Plan requirements pursuant to 17.32_030.D.
C~mme~c~a~/~ceusesmayba~catedintheRRCdla~c~niywiththec~ncun~ntdeve~pment~f~n~maj~rreglona~yre~atedanch~rbusiness~fat~east15~squam
feet per site oi' pfojecL This provision is intended to facilitate the development of large, regionally related uses. Regionally Related Cornmercial uses am t/pitied by large
sce/e businesses which serve a market area signiticantiy larger than those businesses which draw customers I~marily from the neighborhood or community level.
17.32-13 6/99
2
Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.32.030
Subarea One Subarea Two Subarea Three Subarea Four
RETAIL COMMERCIALUSES SCI CC O MR P SC CC O MR MHR SC CC CO LMR MR U MU CC RRC MR LI2 O
Watch and Clock Repair Stores p p p p P p p p p p4
Yardage Goods Stores p p p p P
ENTERTAINMENT AND CULTURAL Subarea One Subarea Two Subarea Three Subarea Four
USES SC CC O MR P SC CC O MR MHR SC CC CO LMR MR U MU CC RRC MR LI2 O
Areades C C C C C C C C
Cultural/Artist Exhibits:
a) Indoor GatleP/and A~ Sales P C P P C P P
b) OutdoorAstExhib~ts P C P C P C I C
Discoffieques C C C C C C ! C C
Theaters:
a) DinnerTheater p P P P P C P
b) Movie Theater including P P P p p
Multiplex
Subarea One Subarea Two Subarea Three Subarea Four
OFFICE & ADMINISTRATIVE USES
SC CC O MR P SC CC O MR ~IHR SC CC CO LMR MR U MU CC RRC MR Li2 O
Administrative, Business, and p P P P P P P P P P P p4 p
Professional Offices
Banks, Finance Services and p p p p p p p p p p p p p
Subarea One Subarea Two Subarea Three Subarea Four
PUBLIC USES
SC I CC O MR P SC I CC O MR MHR SC CC CO .MR MR U MU CC ~RC MR LI2 O
Transit FadJities C
Public Utility Installations p
Refer to Subam 4 Section 17.3Z080. F.7.b. (footnote 2).
2 All indusbial uses and dsveloprnent standards shall be as provided in Subarea 7 of Chapter 17.30.
3 Subject to Master Plan requirements pursuant to 17.32.030.D.
4 CommerciaVOffice uses may be located in the RRC district only with the concurrent development of one major rsgionally related anchor business of at least 15,000 square
feet per sits of project. This provision is intended to tscilitate the development of large, regionally related uses. Regionally Related Commerdal uses am typifmd by lange
scale businesses which sewe a mai~cet area significantly tan3er than those businesses which draw CUstomers primarily from the neighborttood or community level.
17.32-14 6/99
Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17. 32.080
Yard Building ParKIng
Rear Property Line:
Adjacent to Existing or Planned
Residential Development 25 feet 15 feet
Adjacent to Existing or Planned
Commercial Development 0 feet 5 feet
Interior Side Property Line:
Adjacent to Existing or Planned
Residential Development 25 feet 15 feet
Adjacent to Existing or Planned
Commercial Development 5 feet 5 feet
d. Site Dimensions and Heiqht Limitations. Parkway
Land Use
Feature RRC CC LI MR
Minimum Developable Area 5 ac 2 ac 1 ac
Minimum Lot Size 5 ac 2 ac 1 ac
Minimum Lot Width 200 200 200
feet feet feet
Minimum Lot Depth 175 175 175
feet feet feet
Height Limitations: 20 20 20
a) Within 50 feet of street yard
curb face feet feet feet
b) Within 100 feetofa Residential 25 25 25
District feet feet feet
c) Other Locations 35 35 35 35
feet feet feet feet
d) Towers, campaniles, rotundas 45 45 45 45
e) Churches further tha
from a Residential District, 50 50 50
Subject to approval of a feet feet feet
Conditional Use Permit
f) Crucifixes or similar adornment 10 10 10
for churches, subject to feet feet feet
approval of a Conditional Use (above (above (above
Permit toorune) Ine) mofline)
· U ire Cove °o
(includes articulated plazas, hardscape 15% 15% 15%
areas, tuff areas, courtyard, and patios
Open Space 45%
17.32-91 8/00
I~ANC HO CUCAMON GA
DATE: February 7, 2001
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Jon A. Gillespie, Traffic Engineer
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE TO ESTABLISH A PRIMA
FACIE SPEED LIMIT OF 45 ON CHURCH STREET BE'I'W'EEN
MILLIKEN AVENUE AND ROCHESTER AVENUE
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve staff's recommendation to amend Section 10.20.020 of the Municipal Code in order
to establish a prima facie speed limit of 45 mph on Church Street between Milliken Avenue
and Rochester Avenue.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
This segment of Church Street between Milliken Avenue and Rochester Avenue is a new
street that was recently opened to public traffic. It has not been previously surveyed or posted
with a speed limit. Church Street is classified as a major arterial street with a raised median
island. City staff conducted an Engineering and Traffic Survey, and determined that the 85th
percentile speed on Church Street is 48 mph. Therefore, City staff is recommending that a
prima facie speed limit of 45 mph be established for Church Street.
Res~__,:~ui~
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
Attachments
ORDINANCE NO. ~ .~3
AN ORDNANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION
10.20.020 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY CODE TO
ESTABLISH A PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT OF 45 MPH ON
CHURCH STREET BETWEEN MILLIKEN AVENUE AND
ROCHESTER AVENUE
A. Recitals
(i) California Vehicle Code Section 22357 Provides that this City Council may, by
ordinance, set prima facie speed limits upon any portion of any street not a state highway.
(ii) The City Traffic Engineer has conducted an engineering and traffic survey, of
certain streets within the City of Rancho Cucamonga which streets as specified in Part B of this
Ordinance.
(iii) The determinations concerning prima facie speed limits set forth in Part B,
below, are based upon the engineering and traffic survey identified in Section A (ii), above.
B. Ordinance
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1
Section 10.20.020 hereby is amended to the Rancho Cucamonga City Code to read, in
words and figures, as follows:
10.20.020 Decrease of state law maximum speed. It is determined by City Council
resolution and upon the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation that the speed permitted by
state law is greater than is reasonable or safe under the conditions found to exist upon such streets,
and it is declared the prima thcie speed limit shall be as set forth in this section on those streets or
parts of streets designated in this section when signs are erected giving notice hereof:
(Ord. 169 Section I (part), 1982; Ord. 39 Section 5. I, (1978). Rancho Cucamonga 5/82 124
Existing Posted Proposed Prima Facie
Name of Street and Limits Speed Limit (mph) Speed Limit (mph)
1. Church Street-Milliken Ave. to Rochester Ave. NP 45
(i) Both sixty-five (65) miles per hour and fifty-five (55) miles per hour are speeds which
are more than are reasonable or safe; and
(ii) The miles per hour as stated are the prima facie speeds which are most appropriate to
facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and are speed limits which are reasonable and safe on said
streets or portions thereof; and
2. q-I
SPEED LIMIT ORDNANCE
Page 2
(iii) The miles per hour stated are hereby declared to' be the prinra facie speed limits on
said streets; and
(iv) The Traffic Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to install appropriate signs
upon said streets giving notice of the prima facie speed limit declared herein.
Section 2
The City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be
published as required by law.
Section 3
The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published
within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Inland Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of
general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of
Rancho Cucamonga.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
William J. Alexander
ATTEST:
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk
I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do
hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the Council of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the and ~vas passed at a regular meeting of
the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the
Executed this , at Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk
FOOT; ;;LL
VICINITY MAP
Church Street
Miiliken Avenue to Rochester Avenue
Figure"A" .._
,Z65
TRAFFIC AND ENGINEERING SURVEY
City of Rancho Cucamonga, Engineering Department
Street: CHURCH STREET By: Judy Aco~ta Date: 12/13/00
From: Milliken Ave, To: Rochester Ave.
Area Descrintion
Tv~e of Street Major Arterial
Distance 4.169 feet C79 mi~
Vertical Alignment l,ev¢l
Parking Restrictions Parking, nrohibited
Street Width 72 feet
No. of Lanes & Median 2 lanes each direction with landscaned median island
Fron~ne Develonment Residential and Commercial with no residential driveway access
Averase Daily Traffic 6.938 vehicles
Sneed Check Date 12/13/00
Averase Soeed EB: 45 mnh WB: 45 nmh
85% Percentile Sneed 48 nmh 48 mnh
10 Mile Pace 41 - 50 mnh 41 - 50 nmh
Accident Records
Time Period 1998 & 1999 (2 vears/
Intersection Accidents -O-
Midblock Accidents
Accident Rate Exnected 1.90
Accident Rate Calculated ~0-
Co~lditions Not Readily Annarent None
]ixistine Sneed Zone Not Posted
Prouosed Sneed Zone 42 mnh
I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, City Clerk of the City ofRancho Cucamonga, hereby certify
that the above Traffic and Engineering Study was approved and adopted by the City Council.
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk Date
The Traffic and Engineering Surv repared under the supervision of:
fGille:;pi,'P.
ROAD: CHURCH STREET
FROM: Milliken Ave TO: Rochester Ave RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: 12/13/00
LOCATION: @ RADAR SURVEY SHEET BEGIN: 7:30 END: 9:00
WEATHER/ROAD COND.: clear I dry POSTED SPEED: NP
DIRECTION: Eastbound [DIRECTION: Westbound
NUMBER OF VEHICLES J NUMBER OF VEHICLES
MPH 5 10 15 20 25 30 3 H 10 15 20 25 30 3!
5MP
15 PERCENTILE SPEED 43 10 MPH PACE: 41 - 50 15 PERCENTILE SPEED 43 10 MPH PACE: 41 - 50
50 PERCENTILE SPEED 45 # OF VEHICLES IN PACE: 92 50 PERCENTILE SPEED 45 # OF VEHICLES IN PACE: 94
85 PEI~CENTILE SPEED 48 % OF VEHICLES IN PACE: 92 85 PERCENTILE SPEED 48 % OF VEHICLES IN PACE: 94
T HE CITY OF
~ANCIIO C~JCA~IONCA
Memorandum
TO: Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer_~
BY: ' awson, Management Analyst III
M~chelle D
DATE: February 7, 2001
SUBJECT: City Council Agenda for February 7, 2001
Item H-1 Ordinance 58 Report
Please remove the referenced item from the City Council agenda. This item, the
Ordinance 58 report, is being pulled in order to allow staff time to meet with the
Chamber of Commerce for discussion of this issue.
cc: Debbie Adams, City Clerk
ENGIN~;I~I~ING DEPAI~TPlF, NT
DATE: February 7, 2001
TO:. Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FR(:)M: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Michelle Dawson, Management Analyst III
Robed Lemon, Assistant Engineer
SUBJECT: Report on Ordinance 58
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council direct the City Attorney to draft revisions to
Ordinance 58 such that the current threshold for building addition exemptions is increased
and new exemptions regarding sidewalk construction and street light installation are
incorporated into the ordinance. It is further recommended that City Council request the
Planning Commission to review the Utility Undergrounding Resolution to consider limiting
its applicability to new construction.
BAC KG RO U N DIANALYS IS:
Ordinance 58 requires development applicants to construct public improvements as a
means of mitigating impacts and ensuring public health, safety and welfare. In many
cases, the ordinance is the only means by which the City can effectuate compliance of
certain areas with current city standards. Staff has reviewed the ordinance, per the
direction of the City Council, in response to concerns from the business community. The
review concluded that the ordinanca's requirements are consistent, in terms of financial
impact, with the development requirements of other Southern California cities researched
for comparison. In addition, Ordinance 58 provides many exemptions to its requirements.
However, staff has determined that the ordinance can be made less burdensome to minor
development applications through the modification of the building addition exemption and
the inclusion of new exemptions for sidewalk construction and street light installa!ion.
Current exemptions for building additions place the thresholds above which a development
applicant must construct public improvements at 500 square feet and 1,000 square feet-for
commercial and industrial additions, respectively. Current exemptions for sidewalk
construction are limited to developments located on streets spedfically exempted by City
Council resolution.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
REPORT ON ORDINANCE 58
FEBRUARY 7, 2001
PAGE 2
Staff recommends the preparation of the following revisions to Ordinance 58:
· Increase the threshold for exemptions for building additions to 2,500 square feet
for both commercial/office and industrial additions
· Add an exemption for sidewalk construction where strict compliance with the
requirement will cause practical difficulties or unnecessary hardship, as
determined by the City Engineer
· Add an exemption for street light installation for frontages less than 500 feet, per
the approval of the City Engineer
The Public Works Subcommittee has reviewed and concurs with the proposed revisions to
Ordinance 58
Staff and the Subcommittee also reviewed the Planning Commission's Utility
Undergrounding Resolution. The undergrounding of utilities is not a requirement within
Ordinance 58, however, this Planning Commission resolution does impact development.
Limiting the applicability of this resolution to new construction can provide additional
financial relief to minor development applications. The narrowing of the resolution's scope
of applicability will exempt all residential and commercial expansion/addition projects from
undergrounding existing overhead utilities or the payment of undergrounding in-lieu fees
that often represent a substantial cost to small businesses and residents.
The Public Works Subcommittee agreed with staffs recommendation that the City Council
direct the Planning Commission to review and revise the existing Utility Undergrounding
Resolution to limit its applicability to new construction.
Respectfully Submitted,
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:rl
RANC h 0 CUCAMON GA
j
ENG~NEE~X~G DEPAETMENT
S tffReport
DATE: February 7, 2001
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. Q'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Jon A. Giliespie, Traffic Engineer
SUBJECT: STOP SIGNS ON SAPPHIRE STREET AT LEMON AVENUE AND
HIGHLAND AVENUE
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council direct staff to maintain the all-way stop signs at
the intersections of Sapphire Street at Lemon Avenue and Sapphire Street at Highland
Avenue until after the new Route 30/1-210 Freeway opens, and to reevaluate the need
for these stop signs at that time.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
As the City Council will recall, the all-way stop signs on Sapphire Street at Lemon
Avenue and Highland Avenue were installed as a pad of the detour for the closure and
construction of the Carnelian Street Bridge over the Route 30 Freeway. On January 3,
2000, City staff received a petition signed by 124 residents requesting that these all-way
stop signs be allowed to remain in place permanently. These residents indicated in their
petition that they are concerned about speeding traffic on Sapphire Street and
pedestdan safety. Mr. James Stamm of 6430 Sapphire Street was the organizer of this
petition.
On January 19, 2000, City staff received a petition signed by 162 residents requesting
that the stop signs on Sapphire Street at Lemon Avenue and Highland Avenue be
removed. These residents indicated that in their opinion, the stop signs should be
removed because they delay traffic unnecessarily on Sapphire Street, result in
increased travel time, and driver frustration. Mr. Joseph Hanna was the organizer of this
petition effort.
SUBJECT: STOP SIGNS ON SAPPHIRE STREET AT LEMON AVENUE AND
HIGHLAND AVENUE
February 7, 2001
Page 2
At the December 20, 2000, City Council Meeting, Mr. Joseph Hanna addressed the City
Council and requested the removal of stop signs on Sapphire Street at Highland
Avenue and at Lemon Street. Mr. Hanna also provided the City Council with copies of a
petition signed by 162 residents requesting the removal of these stop signs. In response
to this request, Mayor Alexander directed staff to prepare a report, and place this item
on the agenda for discussion at a future City Council meeting.
Following the December 20, 2000 City Council meeting, City staff contacted Mr. Hanna
and Mr. Stamm, and they were both agreeable to discussing this issue at the February
7th City Council Meeting. City staff also sent notices to all of the residents that have
expressed interest in these stop signs, and invited them to attend this public meeting.
On November 14, 2000 City staff collected intersection turning movement count data for
the intersections of Sapphire Street at Lemon Avenue and Sapphire Street at Highland
Avenue. This traffic count data indicated that these intersections do not meet the
minimum traffic volume warrants for all-way stop control. However, work is just
beginning on the freeway mainline between Cucamonga Creek and Hermosa Avenue.
As a part of this construction, the Sapphire Street Bridge will be reconfigured to include
an equestrian path on the west side of the street. There will be the installation of a major
storm drain in '19th Street between Carnelian Street and Jasper Street, and there will be
the construction of on/off ramps at Carnelian Street. This work will require lane closures
and possibly some traffic detours. Therefore, in the opinion of City staff, the stop signs
on Sapphire Street should remain in place until after the Route 30 Freeway is opened,
and that the need for these stop signs should be re-evaluated then.
~lO,Neil~
City Engineer
WJO:JAG
Attachments
Existing
Four Way
Stop
Intersections
\
Exhibit "A"
Sapphire and Highland
Sapphire and Lemon
~ Support the Four way 5t~p
T H E C I T Y O F
R A NC HO C UC A M.O NG A
City of Rancho Cucamonga, Engineering Division
NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING
January 22, 2000
Dear Resident,
On Wednesday, February 7, 2001, at 7:00 PM in the City Council Chamber at
City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, the City CoUncil will be discussing
the status of the stop signs located at the intersections of Sapphire Street at
Lemon Avenue and Sapphire Street at Highland Avenue.
At the December 20, 2000 City Council meeting, a resident addressed the City
Council and requested the removal of the stop signs on Sapphire Street at
Lemon Avenue and Highland Avenue. This resident also presented the City
Council with a petition signed by 162 residents requesting the removal of these
stop signs. Residents who are interested in either keeping or removing these
stop signs are encouraged to attend the February 7, 2001 City Council meeting.
If you cannot attend this meeting in person, your wdtten correspondence is
encouraged and will be included in the public record. Your wdtten
correspondence may be sent to my attention at the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
P.O. Box 807, Rancho Cucamonga, CA. 91729.
If you have any questions, please call me or Mr. Akbar Rizvi, Assistant Engineer,
at (909) 477-2740, extension 4054.
Sincerely,
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Engineerin~,v~/~
~~pie, P.E.
TraffiCEngineer
C: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
Mayor William J. Alexander ~ CoLincilmember Paul BlaRe
Mayor Pro-Tern Diane Williams Councilmember Bob Dufton
Jack Lain, AICR Cih/Manager Councilmember James V. Curatalo
10500 Civic Center Drive · RO. Box 807 · Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 · (909} 477-2700 · FAX {909) 477-2849
www, ci.rancho-cucamonga.ca.us
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Intersection Volumes at Sapphire and Lemon
Date: Nov. 14, 2000
Southbound RIGHT THRCl LEFT
7:3o- a:3o ~034512
~2:oo- ~:oo v~431065
4:30- 5:30 PM21966
7:30 - 12:00 - 4:30 - 7:30 - 12:00 - 4:30 -
8:30At4 I:00PM 5:30PM 8:30Abl I:00PM 5:30PM
Fastbound Westbound
LeFT 1 0 0 g 3 4 mFrr
THRU 4 7 4 6 1 4 T~R.
FUeHT 18 7 7 43 12 2 8 LeFT
Lemon
~} Northbound
" 9 I 106 I 18 7:30-8:30AM
6 87 9 ~2:0o- ~:oo m
II 16 247 34 4:30- 5:30 PM
LeFTTHRU RIGHT
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Intersection Volumes at Sapphire and Highland
Date: Nov. 16, 2000
Southbound RIGHT THRU LEft
7:30- 8:30 n,l13427
~2:oo- ~:oo pt~11363
4:30- 5:3o v~422 1110
7:30 - 12:00 - 4:30 - 7:30 - 12:00 - 4:30 -
8:30At,1 I:00PM 5:30PM 8:30AM I:00PM 5:30PM
Eastbound
Westbound
u~r2 2 1 3 5 14
T~U8 0 5 2 0 6
m~ 19 1 2 30 8 8 LEn'
Highland
Northbound
3: 132 I 15 7:30- 8:30 ~
0 122 15 12:oo l:oop~l
-
10 309 51 4:3o- 5:30 pb4
LEFT THRU RIGHT
THE CITY OF ~
I~ANOEO CUOAEON~
Memorandum
DATE: February ~, 2001
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
'.
BY: Jon A. Gillespie, Traffic Engineer
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR THE REMOVAL OF ALL-WAY STOP SIGNS ON SAPPHIRE
STREET AT LEMON AVENUE AND HIGHLAND AVENUE
On January 22, 2001, City staff hand delivered approximately 200 "Notice of Public Meeting"
fliers, and mailed an additional 162 fliers regarding the subject public meeting to be held on
February 7, 2001. City staff also advertised this meeting in the Daily Bulletin newspaper. As of
February 6, 2001, City staff has received 16 written responses from the public. Of these
responses, eleven (11) residents are in favor of keeping the stop signs, and five (5) residents are
in favor of removing the stop signs. A copy of these letters are attached.
If you have any questions, please Call me at extension 4011.
C: Pamela Easter, Deputy City Manager
Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager 0205stop
T H E C I T Y 0 F
DANClIO CUCAMONGA
City of Rancho Cucamonga, Engineering Division
NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING
January 22, 2000
Dear Resident,
On Wednesday, February 7, 2001, at 7:00 PM in the City Council Chamber at
City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, the City Council will be discussing
the status of the stop signs located at the intersections of Sapphire Street at
Lemon Avenue and Sapphire Street at Highland Avenue.
At the December 20, 2000 City Council meeting, a resident addressed the City
Council and requested the removal of the stop signs on Sapphire Street at
Lemon Avenue and Highland Avenue. This resident also presented the City
Council with a petition signed by 162 residents requesting the removal of these
stop signs. Residents who are interested in either keeping or removing these
stop signs are encouraged to attend the February 7, 2001 City Council meeting.
If you cannot attend this meeting in person, your written correspondence is
encouraged and will be included in the public record. Your written
correspondence may be sent to my attention at the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
P.O. Box 807, Rancho Cucamonga, CA. 91729.
If you have any questions, please call me or Mr. Akbar Rizvi, Assistant Engineer,
at (909) 477-2740, extension 4054.
Sincerely,
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Traffic Engineer
C: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
Mayor William J. Alexander ~ Councilmember Paul Biane
Mayor Pro*Tern Diane Willjams Councilmember Bob Duffon
Jack Lain, AlCR City Manager Councilmember James V. Curatalo
10500 Civic Center Drive · P.O, Box 807 · Rancho Cgcamonga, CA 91729 · (909} 477-2700 · FAX (909) 477-2849
www. ci.rancho-cucamonga.ca.us
January 24, 2001
Dear Mr. Gillespie,
My name is Patricia Powers; I have lived on Marble Ave for the last 18
years. The stops signs in questioned are at the top of my street. It does not
matter how many petitions that have been signed by residents regarding the
removal of these signs. Is all it would take is your depa~hnent to sit out
there on any given morning and watch our children try to dodge cars while
trying to cross the street. Or people taking walks in the evening trying to
cross over Sapphire to Lemon. Before the stop signs I have clocked cars
doing 50-55 mph down this street. With the stop sign they cannot. About
five years ago my daughter had the front of her car ripped off by a driver
doing 58 mph. Thank God she was not killed. When my children were in
elementary school the bus stop was at the comer of Marble and Sapphire. A
parent would have to sit there every morning to make sure no children
crossed the street and were hit by speeding cars. Two weeks after I got the
bus stop changed a car hit another car head on and smashed into the wall
where the bus stop had been two weeks before. I am sure if you take the
time to check out accidents or speeding tickets for this area you will know
what I mean. I am sorry the people who want the stop signs removed would
have to inconvenient themselves by an additional 2-3 minutes a day, but
isn't the safety of our children worth this? Please do not remove the stop
signs. Our city is here because we must take the time to care and protect
everyone. Thank you for you time.
Sincerely,
Pauicia Powers
C: Mayor
January 24, 2001
Barry and Jan Hydeman
6440 Aquamarine Ave.
Alta Loma, CA 91701
Mr. Jon A. Gillespie, P. E.
Traffic Engineer
City of Rancho Cucamonga
P. O. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729
Dear Mr. Gillespie,
We're writing to respectfully request that the city leave the stop signs on Sapphire Street
at Lemon Avenue and Highland Avenue. Before the signs were in place, cars roared up
and down Sapphire at a dangerous speed. With the stop signs installed at those two
intersections, it's both easier and safer for kids like our son to cross Sapphire to get to
and from school.
January 28, 2001
L!U jAN 5 0 Z,~; LZL-~
Cit~ ofR.~cho Cucafaonga
P.O. Box 80? '~" ;" , , ~.t:., ,'~:,,~,.
A~B: ~. JoB A Ggiespie, ~.B.
~: Feb~a~ 7, 2001 Public Meeting
De~ ~. G~espie:
~ you for yo~ recent co~es~ndence ~g~d~g the public m~t~g to ~ held on
Feb~ 7th- We will ~ ~ble to aRend the meet~g, but woffid l~e to express o~
optiota reg~d~g the ~op sig~ at Sapp~c Street ~d Highland and Lemon Avenues.
Wc reside at 8439 H~ter Drive, w~ch is appro~tely 2 blocks ~om the ~ter~ction of
Highl~d Avenue ~d Sapp~ S~eet. In the newly t~ ye~s ~t we ~ve resided at
t~ ad~ess, we ~ve obse~ t~t the southird flow oftr~c on Sapp~e Street ~
~lly ~en e~remely f~t. ~s Ms been obse~ed ~th with the stop sign at the
~tersection ~d al~ when ~e te~or~ ~c sig~l w~ ~alled d~ ~e bridge
co~t~ion. (On one oc~io~ o~ c~ w~ newly hit broadside by a no~h~d
motorist who did not ~ther to ~op at the ~op sign).
Ifffie ~op sign were ~moved ~om t~s ~ter~ctio~ tho~ of~ residents who mu~ ~e
leR-~d t~ onto Sapp~e wo~d be more at ~k to ~ ~volved ~ ~ accident t~ we
~e now ~th the sign ~ place. We U~e you not to allow the stop sign to be removeall
We ve~ ~ldom ~avel no~h~d on Sapp~e a~ve Hig~d, but given the ~gh
voice of t~c, we ~sumc t~t ~e residents ne~ the ~te~ection of Hig~d ~d
Lemon ~ve the s~e conce~. We would also ~ge ag~t the removal oft~t stop
s~n ~ well.
We t~ you ~a~ for noti~g ~ of the upco~g division reg~d~g ~ issue ~d
hope t~t o~ op~io~ will ~ ~cluded ~ yo~ action to re~lvc the ~er.
S~cerel ,
J~et ~ Be~eR
February 1, 2001
Mr. Jon A. Gillespie, P.E. .};::,:.':it ::'~,~ >.'.....',.
Traffic Engineer
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Post Office Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91701
Dear Mr. Gillespie,
This is in response to the Notice of Public Meeting to be held on February 7, 2001,
regarding the status of the stop signs on Sapphire Street. My husband and I will be
unable to attend the meeting in person but wanted our voice to be included in the public
record concerning the stop signs on Sapphire Street at Lemon and Highland Avenues.
We have lived near Highland Avenue and Sapphire Street for 15 years and very much
welcomed the signal that was installed at that intersection during the construction of the
overpass bridge. It not only allowed us and our children to merge onto and cross
Sapphire safely, it also reduced the speed at which cars travel north and south on
Sapphire, thus reducing the number of accidents at those intersections.
Because there tends to be more traffic in the early A.M. and early P.M.on Sapphire, a
sensor-control traffic light makes the most sense at these two locations, as we had during
the bridge construction. We do not understand why those signals were removed and
replaced with stop signs. In any event, for the safety of our citizens, and more
importantly, our children, we request that either stop signs or sensor-control traffic
signals remain on Sapphire at both Highland and Lemon Avenues. Thank you.
Sincerely,
~ ma A. Nicholas
Victoria M. Nicholas
6440 Sard Street
Alta Loma, CA 91701
cc: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William J. O~leil, City Engineer
January 23,2001
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Jon A. Gillespie, P.E.
P.O. Box 807
R. Cucamonga, CA 91729
Ref: Stop signs at Sapphire and Lemon, and Sapphire and Highland
Mr. Gillespie,
This letter is in reference to the stop signs located at the intersections
of Sapphire Street at Lemon and at Highland Avenue.
We are very much aqainst those si~ns bein~ removed. The traffic
down Sapphire is already too fast with the stop signs. We are
concerned about the speed cars may reach if they are not required to
stop at least half way down the hill. There are many children and
older people who walk in the area; not to mention school bus stops
along Sapphire. Families '~ake pride in living here and the safety of
our people, especially our children should be the priority - Not how
fast the people at the top of the hill can get to the bottom.
Please express our opinion at the meeting on February 7, 2001.
Thank you.
6420 Aqua Marine Ave.
Alta Loma, CA 91701 ~'1;~ "~''" ~"""~
FEB 0 5 ~"~'
EEB-eS-Ol 11:1~ AM ERICKSON BLUE ~UNNY 909 989 ~264 P.el
February 4, 2001
Mr. Ion A. Cvillesple, P.E.
Traffic Engineer
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIVIONGA
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucarnonga, CA 91729
Dear Mr. Gillespie,
I am in receipt of your letter regarding a public meeting to dismiss the stop siSns located
st Sapphire Street at Lemon Avenue and Sapphire Street at Highland Avenue.
Unfortunately, I am traveling this week and will not be able to attend the meeting.
However, I would like to have my voice heard. I live at the comer of Sapphire Street and
Lemon Avenue and have two small children, two and five. This is a very busy
intersection and I have witnessed cars traveling southbound at very high speeds. I have
watched these cars fail to stop or roll through the stop signs.
The reason I bring up my two small children is because I am fearful that if the stop signs
w~re removed, the rate ofspe, ed these can travel would only inereas~. I watch my
children always, but if one were Io ever slip away it c~tainly would be safer with stop
signs than without.
How much time can one really save by removing these stop signs? One minute? I think
that one minute of a motorists time is far better than perhaps the possibility of a tragedy.
Thank you for your consideration and I certainly hops the signs remain.
Sincerely, ,
8335 Lemon Avenue
Alta Loma, CA 91701
(909) 989-4504
Date: January 31, 2001
To: Jon A. Gillespie, P.E.
From: Ron & Terri Seymour
Subject: Stop signs at Lemon
Dear Mr. Gillespie
We received your letter concerning the stop signs on Sapphire at Lemon & Highland, and
the concern of local residents. We live at 6249 Marble Ct. and have resided there for the
past seven years. We believe that the concem of local residents are people who live north
of theses stop signs and have to stop at them on their way to work or during various trips.
Obviously they feel that having to stop twice between Banyan and 19th is an undue hassle
for them and causes them further delay while driving.
The main concern that we have is that these stop signs assist in slowing down traffic on
this street, thus making the street a little safer. However the primary concern is that these
locations are also bus stops for children on Monday thin Friday both during the morning
and in the afternoon. One cannot justify how the removal of these stops signs, as they
provide overall safety to children walking to, or while at the bus stop. I am sure if any of
these people that signed the petition lived in this area and their children used these bus
stops while going or coming home tiom school, they would never consider the removal
of the stop signs, and probably would have petitioned to have them installed in the first
place.
I performed my on test to see exactly how much time these stop signs inconvenience
people by having to stop at these two locations. I first drove down Carnelian south to 19th
without having to stop until I reached 19th street. This took me a total of 1 minute and
01.88 seconds, while driving at approximately 40 MPH. I then drove north on Sapphire
and went north to Banyan, while stopping at Highland and Lemon. This took me a total
of 1 minute and 26.69 seconds. This equates to a total of 24.81 seconds that these two
stop signs inconvenience people that are driving on Sapphire between 19th and Banyan. I
find it hard to believe that these residents are more concerned about the additional 24.81
seconds, that these stop signs cause them in delay, as to the safety that these signs provide
to the community, and especially the children that use these locations every school day.
As you and I know, the people driving down Sapphire rarely obey the posted speed limit
because they are in such a hurry to get to where they are going. I believe if these signs are
removed, it is just a matter of time before someone is either, seriously injured or killed
because of the high speeds in
which people travel on this street. I pray to God that this will not be the case; However,
if the city decides to remove these stop signs the chances of this happening are going to
be tremendous.
It is our opinion, that these stops signs on Sapphire at Lemon and Highland should
remain in place for the safety of all community members, and not because they are an
inconvenience to certain concemed residents.
Sincerely
Ron and Terri Seymour
6249 Marble Ct.
Alta Loma, Ca. 91701
To the Rancho Cucamonga Ci~' Council 2f'4/01
Alien: Ion A. Gillespie, P.E.
Mr Gillespie,
In resporLse to ),our letter dated January.' 22, 201)1, my family and I would like to
be includedin the public record to keep the stop signs at Sapphire Street at
Lemon Avenue and Sapphire Street at High/and Avenue. We liv'e to the west of
Sapphire on Highland Avenue. We have two children and the stop signs at
Sapphire Street and Highland Avenue provide a safe crossing ~3r them m their
iiends home and Be~'l Park. If you remove them, the only safe crossing fe, r
them would be a I/2 mile to the north at Ba~van or I/2 south to 19th Street We
have lived in this home ibr 7 ye~s now ~mnd we know ~'lhe sig1~ are remc~ed,
the drivers coming down Sapphire will be doing 50-+ mpk, as Ihey had
the slims were installed. We had talked to the traB]c consult~x, a couple of
),ears back, w-ho the ciy; hired to take traftic co~mts at these locations. He had
a~eed ruth tLs that the si~s do slow traffic down and would pro~4de a s~er
condition ibr all of us. We fill O~at there a'e f~ less accidents now then ~tbre
~d I ~ sure your recor& reflect that..~d as far ~s I an conceme& Sapphire
should not be considered a major a~erial such ~ C~eli~. 1ere ~e
alo~ Sapphire, t~e road is not ~ wide mxd there ~e pedest~s present.
would someone want the si~s to be remov~ other then be~ lie to race
Sapphke. I ~ not o~y asking became I ~ a concern citizen ~d p~enk bm
am a civil engineer ~br a locM ~ency a~d iI is my proIbssionai opinion Ihat
si~s iould remain. Safey~ iould be ot~ top prionD?. Please keep the stop
The'ink You,
8250 t{iL'-hland Ave
Alto Loma, Col 917<31
9~t'I 329 ~
Leslie and Donna Roman
~ Citrine Street
Alta Loma, CA 91701
Ph (909) 989-1017
January 2:3, 2001 ~"~
Jon A. Gillespie, P_E.
Traffic Engineer
Community Development Department
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
P.O. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729
RE.: STOP SIGNS ON SHAPPIRE AT LEMON AND HIGHLAND AVENUES
PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE STOP SIGNS FOR TRAFFIC.AND pF, I~ESTRIAN
SAFETY!!!
Thank you.
Sincerely,
Leslie and Dnnna RonlaI1
Update on the 4 way stops on Sapphire
at Highland and at Lemon/Marble
If you find stopping unnecessarily on Sapphire at Lemon and again at Highland to be
frustrating, your opportunity to be heard is rapidly approaching.
It' s been just over a year since 150 folks signed a petition to remove the 4 way stops, and
about a year since the petition was submitted to various city officials. In that year I
estimate that over 5.8 million unnecessary stops and starts have occurred at these two
intersections.
There is no justification to retain the 4 way stops. The city has conducted a traffic
volume survey, a speed survey, and has reviewed the accident history. All of the data
indicates that the 4 way stops should NOT be retained. This conclusion is based on the
guidelines that the city uses for stop sign placement. The traffic controls (stops at Lemon
and a signal light at Highland) were placed temporarily to aid a detour while Carnelian
was closed for bridge construction. In the interim, a petition for the retention of "control"
at these intersections was submitted, resulting in a 4 way stop replacing the signal at
Highland and the retention of the 4 way stop at Lemon after Carnelian was re-opened.
I waited patiently for the city to take action on my petition to remove the 4 way stops.
The traffic surveys were conducted in April '00 and the issue was to have gone to the city
council late in '00 but public works has now decided to leave the stops in place at least
until the freeway opens and review traffic flow after that. I can probably guarantee
that if the stops are left for 2 more years, the city will never remove them.
On December 20th, I attended the city council meeting and presented the case for removal
of the stops. This has resulted in two actions. Firstly, the issue will be on the agenda for
the Feb. 7th City council meeting. Secondly, another petition to retain the stops was
presented.
The data shows that the stops should not be retained and I believe that the city staffs
recommendation will be to remove the stops. I also know that the city council may go
against staff recommendations if it believes that the public desires something else. Those
desiring to retain these unnecessary 4 way stops will be out in force. I need your help.
First, I need updated petition signatures. Please sign the attached petition
and if possible get your friends, family, and neighbors to sign it. Please contact me (info
below) to have the petitions collected. Second, I need folks to attend the Feb. 7th
City Conncil meeting at 7 p.m. to voice their opinion on the issue. Without a show
of support we'll likely be stopping on Sapphire forever.
Please contact me to collect the petitions:
Joe Hanna phone: 909-989-2346
5886 Turquoise Ave.
Alta Loma, CA 91701 e-mail: sapphirestreet@yahoo.com
4 January 2001
Petition for the Removal
Of Stop Signs on Sapphire Street
at Highland and LemonfMarble.
Petition:
We, the undersigned, hereby request that the 4-way stops at Sapphire and Highland Ave.
and at Sapphire and Lemon/Marble be returned to 2-way stop status as they were prior to
the start of construction of the Carnelian Ave. freeway bridge.
Name: (printed) Stxeet Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Mr. & Mrs. Sweeden
6414 Peridot Avenue
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701
Mr. Jon A. Gillespie, P.E.
Traffic Engineer
City ofRancho Cucamonga, Engineering Division
P.O. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729
Dear Mr. Gillespie,
We received your letter dated January 22, 2001, regarding the upcoming City Council
hearing on the requested removal of the stop signs at Sapphire and Lemon Avenue. We
reside a few blocks ~-om this location and usually travel through this intersection several
times a day. We join those local residents requesting the removal of these stop signs.
The stop signs have increased congestion in the area during commute times. It is
frequently difficult to exit Alta Loma Drive onto Sapphire, in peak traffic times, because
of the back-up from the stop signs. Motorists also frequently disregard the stop signs
because they now realize the signs do not serve their traditional purpose of safely
controlling traffic on intersecting roadways. Traffic on Highland Avenue is too fight to
justify stopping all traffic on Sapphire and in our 10 years of living here, we notice very
little pedestrian traffic at the intersection.
In fairness to the proponents who wish to keep the signs, they do slow traffic in the dose
proximity ofthe intersections. That, however, should not be the function ofstoP signs.
They are supposed to control right-of-way. When motorists realize they do not serve this
purpose, they are less likely to stop and disregard for lawful driving is encouraged. The
congested traffic caused by the signs has also encouraged an increasing number of
motorists to unsafely attempt to pass stopped traffic, on the right side.
The City Council should remove the signs and request the Rancho Cucamonga Police
Department to provide patrol and speed enforcement on Sapphire to ensure compliance
with safe speed laws. A painted crosswalk across Sapphire and appropriate signage
advising of the pedestrian crossing should also be in place.
Thank you for your letter advising of the Council discussion and encouraging resident
input. We hope the Council will favorable consider our requests on the matter.
Sincerely,
· ~A~C & JAMIE SWEEDEN
~,~,~,
5038 Via Paralso SL
Alta Loma, CA 91701
T HI~ CITY OF
~,AXCHO CUa~O~Z~
DATE: February 7, 2001
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Mana
SUBJECT: LETTERS FROM RESIDENTS REGARDING THE REMOVAL OF ALL-WAY
STOP SIGNS ,ON SAPPHIRE STREET AT LEMON AVENUE AND HIGHLAND
AVENUE
On February 6, 2001, the City Council was provided with copies of sixteen (16) letters from
residents regarding the subject stop signs. Of these letters, eleven (11) residents supported
keeping the stop signs and five (5) residents requested their removal. On February 7, 2001, City
staff received 6 additional letters from residents regarding the removal of stop signs on Sapphire
Street at Lemon Avenue and Highland Avenue. Of these letters, five (5) are in favor of keeping
the stop signs, and one (1) is in favor of removing the stop signs. A copy of these additional
letters is attached.
If you have any questions, please call me at extension 4011.
C: Pamela Easter, Deputy City Manager
Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager 0207stop
February 2, 2001
Mr. Gillespie,
On behalf of myself and my family I am responding to the
issue of the removal of the stop signs on Sapphire St. at
Highland and Lemon.
I feel that the removal of these stop signs would create
a very dangerous situation for our children. During high traffic
hours in the mornings it is difficult to cross Sapphire St.
even with the stop signs. The children that live west of Sapphire
need to cross this street in order to get to both the Junior
High School and the High School. If these stop signs are removed
our children will have a difficult time crossing this street
for school.
In addition to the safety of our children I believe that
we will experience a large increase in the speed of the vehicles
heading south on Sapphire, as it is down hill. I have personally
experienced people running the stop sign at Highland and Sapphire
at high speeds as I was crossing this intersection heading
eastbound.
In conclusion, I feel that the safety of our children is
much more important than the inconvenience of stopping for two
stop signs in your vehicle. I am strongly opposed to the removal
of these stop signs.
Thank You,
Cindy Marzoline
6476 Carol Ave.
Alta Loma, CA 91701
February 7, 2001
Honorable Mayor William Alexander
City Of Rancho Cucamonga
Post Office Box 807
RanchoCucamonga, CA 91729-0807
RE: Removal of Stop Signs
Dear Mayor Alexander:
My name is John Rossiter, and I reside at 6193 Sapphire Street, Rancho Cucamonga, 91701.
I am writing you in response to a notice that was posted on my door regarding the possible
removal of the current stop signs located at Lemon Avenue and Sapphire Street and Highland
Avenue and Sapphire Street. As a resident living on Sapphire Street, this possible action
deeply disturbs me.
It is my understanding that a gentleman who lives in the area of Thoroughbred Street is
currently generating a petition to have the stop signs removed. Although I have not
personally seen this petition, it would be my guess that the majority of signatures are from
the residents who live north of Banyan Street. I find it very upsetting that due to the
inconvenience they must live with having to make two additional stops, they would sacrifice
public safety to save a few seconds of their time.
Living on Sapphire Street between Lemon Avenue and Banyan Street, I see first-hand how
fast people drive up and down Sapphire Street. The posted speed limit is 40 mph, but it is a
very rare occasion to see anyone driving less than 45-55 mph and that is with the current stop
signs in place. When the double trailer gravel trucks or cement mixer tracks are traveling
downhill on Sapphire Street, they too exceed the posted speed limit. With respect for our
Fire Department, they frequently use Sapphire Street for emergency situations and they drive
safer and with more concern than most normal vehicles. Fortunately, we have a driveway
that is approximately 30 feet wide, which we can turn around in and pull out onto the street
going forward. If the current stop signs are removed, I don~ understand how anyone thinks
any resident who must back out of their driveway will be able to do so with the constant flow
of high-speed traffic. The current stop signs provide a traffic break, which enable the
residents living on Sapphire Street to back out onto the street safely.
Another major concern to me is the safety of the children who either live on Sapphire Street
or must cross Sapphire Street at Lemon Avenue to attend Alia Loma Jr. High. If the current
stop sign at this intersection is removed, they will either have to walk up to Banyan Street or
down to 19th Street to have an accessible crosswalk. I have a friend that lives on Marble
Avenue (Lemon Avenue becomes Marble Avenue when you cross Sapphire Street) that is
also extremely concerned about the possible removal of the current stop sign. Prior to the
installation of the current stop sign at Lemon Avenue and Sapphire Street, you could hear
frequent screeching of breaks when cars or pedestrians would try to cross the street at this
intersection. She stated the current stop sign provides the necessary break for the residents in
her tract to cross Sapphire Street safely. During the 2-3 weeks of the Christmas holidays, the
traffic is usually lined up from south of Lemon Avenue all the way up to Thoroughbred
Street. How do you expect the residents of the tracts west of Sapphire Street to cross over
safely without the current stop signs? My friend said that prior to the installation of these
stop signs, they would have to go north on Jasper Street to Banyan Street, west on Banyan
Street and south on Sapphire Street to Marble Avenue to get home safely. Talk about
inconvenience!l! She said that even when the line of vehicles going north on Sapphire Street
to see the lights would stop to let someone cross the intersection, it was very dangerous, as
you couldn't see the vehicles coming south on Sapphire Street.
I would also like you to bring to your attention that all the major intersections between
Sapphire Street and Haven Avenue have 4-way stop signs or traffic signals. With the recent
installation of the stop sign for vehicles traveling south on Jasper Street at Lemon Avenue, if
the stop sign at Sapphire Street and Lemon Avenue were removed, this would be the only 2-
way stop across the that whole stretch which would create an additional safety hazard.
As a resident of a City that claims public safety is the Council Members first priority, I don't
understand how you could even consider removing these two stop signs because they are an
inconvenience for people. Perhaps the speed limit in the area of Thoroughbred Street should
be raised to 50 mph and all the stop signs removed and see how the residents in that area deal
with it! I don't have any children of my own, but I do see teenagers riding their skateboards
and scooters down Sapphire Street from time to time. God forbid these stop signs are
removed; I would hate to see the possible consequences that could happen to these innocent
kids.
I certainly hope that all the members of the council will look at all the safety issues involved
before deciding to remove these two much needed stop signs because they are inconvenient!
C: Diane Williams, Mayor Pro Tem
Paul Biane, Council Member
James V. Curatalo, Council Member
Bob Dutton, Council Member
Jack Lam, City Manager
William J. O~eil, City Engineer
Jon Gillespie, Traffic Engineer
February 4, 2001
City of Rancho Cucamonga, Engineering Division
Jon A. Gillespie, P.E Traffic Engineer
Akbar Rizvi, Assistant Engineer
Re: Stop signs at the intersections of Sapphire St. at Lemon Ave. and
Sapphire St. at Highland Ave.
Dear Sirs:
Thank you for sending out a notice for the City Council meeting to be held
on Feb. 7, 2001 regarding the above stop sign issues. As residents who live
west of Sapphire St. off of Marble Ave., we are very concerned about this issue
and would request that these stop signs stay in effect. We have a son who
attends Alta Loma High School and walks home from school regularly. Without
this stop sign at Sapphire St. and Lemon Ave, it would be an extreme risk for his
crossing safely. We would like to include other concerns about the removal of
these stop signs as follows:
· All children need to cross these streets safely when walking to and from
school, visiting friends, etc.
· Driving across Sapphire St. during early morning or evening rush hour is very
difficult without a stop sign.
· Without a stop sign, cars have exceeded the speed limit driving south on
Sapphire St.
· During Christmas time, it is extremely difficult to get to my street, Marble Ct.,
without the stop sign because of Thoroughbred traffic.
These are only just a few of the important reasons why we feel these stop signs
must remain. I realize that the people north of us would like to speed down
Sapphire St. so they can get to their destination sooner, but how much time do
they think they will save? Maybe one minute at the most? Is endangering a
child's life less important than one minute? I say NO and I strongly feel that the
city of Rancho Cucamonga will say NO also. In the state of California the
pedestrian always has the right-of-waY, tiowever when people are speeding
down Sapphire St., I have often hesitated before crossing the street myself with
the stop sign intact even though I have the right-of-waY. I would hate to see
these stop signs removed with the chance of tragedy happening. Then where
will we be?--with a possible life lost or maimed and the stop signs reappearing
again. Thank you for giving us the opportunity to respond to this issue. I hope
you will consider the importance of continuing the safety of your community
members along Sapphire St. south of Banyon.
Ashok & Urmila Khanna
6463 Citrine Street,
ALTA LOMA, CA 91701
January 31, 2001
To,
The Traffic Engineer Mr. Jon A. Gillcspie
Assistant Engineer Mr. Akbar Rizvi.
Community Development Dept.
Engineering Division
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
10500 Civic Center Drive
P.O.Box 807
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91729
REF: NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING
' TO DISCUSS THE STOP SIGN ~ SAPPHIRE ST. AND HIGHLAND AVENUE
Dear Nix. GiHespie & Mr. Rizvi,
We are very disappointed to receive this notice that you are still considering to remove these stop signs.
First of all it was a big mistake and wastes of taxpayer money to put a traffic light and than remove it.
the past we had quite a few serious accidents, when we didn't have anything, we had hundreds of very
Iciest calls (WHICH YOU WILL NOT FIND lN YOUR RECORDS) out of which 5-6 were experienced by
me and my family. Thank god we survived. Even after having this stop sign I my self had 2 incidents of
close calls just because people coming down on Sapphire St. hate to stop. We remember when we didn't
have any sign before we had to wait unlimited amount of time to make a left turn from HIghland to
Sapphire St., as you know majority of accidents happens while ranIcing these kinde of lea turns. The
ra61,,d~ on the other side pap the _f~'~ SO DO WE than whV this discrimination in providing services.
WE STRONGLY OPPOSE THIS CONSIDERATION OF REMOVING THESE STOP SIGNS AND WE
WOULD LIKE THESE TO STAY.
BEST OF ALL TO SATISFY ALL RESIDENTS WE THINK IT'S FAIRER TO EVERYONE TO
REPLACE THESE STOP SIGNS WITH TRAFFIC LIGHTS.
Hope you will not disappoint us and provide us a FAIR judgment.
C: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Feb 5,2001
TO: City of Rancho Cucamonga
P.O. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729
ATTN: Traffic Engineer Jon A. Gillespi
RE: City Council Meeting's discussion of removing the "temporary" stop
sign from intersection of Highland St and Sapphire St
Sir,
I logged onto the city web page and attempted to send the following opinion via
the "contact us" link. However the link failed due to "unknown address" and the
emil was returned to me. Great link, eh?!?
I wish I could attend the Feb 7t" Council Meeting in order to register my feelings
about the stop sign at Highland & Sapphire. But I cannot attend. So please
consider this written opinion in lieu of verbal comment.
The stop sign was supposedly a "temporary" facilitation to fleeway construction.
Highland is a dead end street. There is no need to continue with this stop sign
after construction is completed. As it is now, 95% of the time that I stop at this
intersection while traveling up or down Sapphire there is no Highland cross traffic
of any kind.
Please register my YES vote when discussing removal of this stop sign!
Thank you.
Jerry Emilio !! ,, r
6254 Amberwood Dr
Alta Loma, CA 91701 [
909 987-4030
Information Supporting
Removal
of the All-way stops
at
Sapphire & Lemon/Marble
&
Sapphire & Highland
What We Were Told
Prior to the Carnelian Closure
· At the SANBAG meeting we were told that
Sapphire was to be the detour for Carnelian
and TEMPORARY controls would be
installed at Lemon and at Highland.
· Upon questioning both during and after the
meeting, a city representative assured the
audience that the controls would be
removed when Carnelian re-opened.
Why & How Controls Were Installed
· Sapphire was designated as the detour for
the closure of Carnelian for construction.
· An all-way stop was added at
Lemon/Marble to facilitate the detour and 4
lanes were striped on Sapphire.
· A traffic signal was added at Highland to
facilitate the detour and 4 lanes were
striped on Sapphire.
What happened when
Carnelian re-opened
· The signal at Highland was replaced with an
all-way stop.
· The all-way stop at Lemon was not
removed.
· The 4 lane striping on Sapphire was reduced
to 2 lanes.
· This was not as advertised!
· No nonce was g~ven to the users of
Sapphire.
Traffic Volume Comparison
Traffic Volume 4/27/00
Hourly Totals
Sapphire / Lemon / Highland
600
500
400
300 I ~
200 LeIIlOI1
~ oo nighland
0
Time of Day
Source: City of Rancho Cucamonga Traffic Survey
Traffic Flow Facts
· Sapphire traffic volume is 10 times the traffic
volume on the minor streets.
· Traffic at the minor streets is seldom encountered
by Sapphire traffic.
· Frequent traffic openings have always existed on
Sapphire. The stop s~gns have reduced the
frequency and duranon of those opemngs.
· Most driveways on Sapphire are designed for
access to a colle, ctor street. They ~ncorporate
circles or turnabouts so residents need not back
into traffic.
Traffic Flow Facts (continued)
· Stop s~gn spacing:
- Banyan to Lemon:1200 feet
- Lemon to Highland:1500 feet
- Highland to 19th:1350 feet
· Frequent stop s~gns tend to evenly space traffic
increasing the difficulty and reducing the safety
of entering traffic at other intersections and
driveways.
· All way stops can actually increase the waiting
time of minor street traffic due to the need to wait
for traffic to stop rather than to clear.
Traffic Flow Facts (continued)
· Quotes from R.C. web page on stop s~gn
placement:
· One common misuse of stop signs is to arbitrarily interrupt through traffic, either by
causing it to stop, or by causing such an inconvenience as to force the traffic to use other
routes. Where stop signs are installed as "nuisances" or "speed breakers," there is a
high incidence of intentional violation. In those locations where vehicles do stop, the
speed reduction is effective only in the immediate vicinity of the stop sign, and
frequently speeds are actually higher between intersections. For these reasons, it
should not be used as a speed control device.
· A school crossing may look dangerous for children to use, causing parents to demand a
stop sign to halt traffic. Now a vehicle which had been a problem for 3 seconds while
approaching and passing the intersection becomes a problem for a much longer period.
A situation of indecision is created as to when to cross as a pedestrian or when to start as
a motorist. Normal gaps in traffic through which crossings could be made safely no
longer exist. An intersection which previously was not busy now looks like a major
intersection. It really isn't -- it just looks like it. It doesn't even look safer, and it
usually isn't.
Additional Fuel Cost of Stops
· These 2 all-way stops cause 16,000 unnecessary
stops and acceleraUons to 40 mph per day.
· This wastes 1,600 gallons of fuel/day.
· That is 584,000 gallons per year!
· This is a "hidden tax" of $876,000 per year!
· This costs the average driver $219 per year.
(based on 1 trip each up and down Sapphire per day)
Increased Vehicle Maintenance Costs
· Brakes: $120,000 per year
- the equivalent of 2 to 3 sets of brakes are burned up per
day by these stops.
· Tires
· Between Fuel and Maintenance these stops easily
cost in excess of $1,000,000 per year!
- Don't let anyone tell you that stop signs are a cheap
way to "control" traffic.
Increased Air Pollution
· 584,000 gallons of fuel wasted per year.
· This equates to:
- 26,000 pounds of VOCs
- 35,000 pounds of NOx
- 1,800 pounds of TAPs
- 10,200,000 pounds of CO
(Source: Robert Campagna)
· Brake dust and tire particulates
Time Wasted
· Based on an average time increase of 15 seconds
per stop, this costs the average Sapphire street user
over 6 hours per year.
· The cumulative lost time is over 36,500 hours
per year!
Accident History
1/1/95 through 12/31/99
· Sapphire & Highland:
- 8/3/96 - Collision between W/B & N/B vehicles
· 1 minor injury
- 8/19/96 - Collision between W/B & S/B vehicles
· No injury
- 3/11/98 - Collision between S/B & S/B vehicles
· 1 minor injury
· Sapphire & Lemon:
- 8/5/98 - Collision between E/B & S/B vehicles · 2 minor injuries
· No Pedestrian incidents!
· Incident rates have been lower than expected
for the traffic volume!
Source: City of Rancho Cucamonga
Speed Survey
· 100 vehicles in each direction
· 11/19/98 between 4:05 & 4:45 P.M.
· 20 feet north of Orange Ave.
· N/B 851h percentile speed = 43 mph
· S/B 851h percentile speed = 43 mph
Source: City of Rancho Cucamonga Traffic Survey
Summary
· Current placement of these all-way stops
violates R.C. traffic guidelines.
· No warrants are even close to being met for
all-way stops at these ~ntersechons.
· Many states including Califorma have
guidelines that state that stop signs are not
to be used as speed breakers. Speed is
controlled by limit signs and enforcement.
Summary (continued)
· Home ownership does NOT extend to
public thoroughfares.
· Sapphire is a collector street serving
hundreds of homes north of 19th.
· 19th Street is unfortunately the
northernmost E/W route making Sapphire a
necessary route of travel for thousands of
residents.
Summary (continued)
· Both Highland and Lemon (Marble) end
just a few hundred feet west of Sapphire.
· There is virtually no through traffic on these
m~nor streets.
· The N/W section of the city has been built
out and traffic patterns have been stable for
many years.
Conclusions
· The placement of these all-way stops defy the city
~uidelines and logic.
· They are wasteful.
· The fears of mayhem, difficulty pulling into
traffic, and gross speeding are misperceptions
unsupported by fact and history.
· Sapphire street had an excellent safety record prior
to placement of the unwarranted controls.
Conclusions (continued)
· When Carnelian was completely closed, detour
traffic primarily used Hillside & Banyan to access
Sapphire.
· Future detour traffic will primarily use Hillside &
Banyan to access Sapphire or will detour to
Baseline.
· Unwarranted stops instill a false sense of security
in minor street traffic increasing the likelihood of
major injury or death.
Letters and
Information
Supporting
Removal
of the
All-Way Stops
Page 1 of 1
Proulx, Pat
To: Gillespie, Jon
Subject: Stop Signs
Dear Mr. Gillespie,
I will not be able to attend the Council meeting on Feb. 7th due to a training commitment. I received the
notice in the mail on the stop sign issue and would like to voice my opinion in favor of removing them. As the
study of traffic flow, accidents, etc. show
there is no justification in keeping them. As a resident who uses Sapphire routinely, the signs have caused
traffic problems especially dudrig commuting hours. As an emergency responder in this community our on-
scene times as well as AMR(ambulance) have been extended due to having to slow and many times stop
before preceding through a 4-way stop. There are now three such intersections between 19th and Banyan,
with two of them having no apparent reason for being there.
Thank you for your attention on this issue,
Pat Proulx
5866 Turquoise Ave.
Alta Loma
January 28, 2001
Mr. Jon A. Gi[tespie
Traffic Engineer
Rancho Cucamonga City Hall
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamon!]a, CA 91730
Dear Mr. GitLespie,
I am writing to support the removal of the stop si!]ns on Sapphire Street and Lemon and
HighLand Avenues. In addition to the data coLLected by the city showin!] that the stop signs
are not warranted and should not be retained, I would Like the city to consider the
environmental impact of the stop si!]ns. I am a chemical engineer, working in the oil refining
industry and am an expert in the field of gasoline production and gasoline emissions. I have
made the foLLowing caLcuLations with regard to the effects of the two stop signs.
When cars stop and re-acceLerate, there is an increase in gasoline consumption and an
increase in vehicle emissions. For a car to accelerate from 0 to 40 mph, the increase in
gasoline use is approximately 0.1 gaLLons. With about 4000 vehicles traveling each direction
on Sapphire Street each day, the two stop signs cause roughly 16,000 extra stops and starts
daily, increasing gasoline consumption by 1600 gaLLons/day. On an annual basis, this equates
to 584,000 gaLLons of additional gasoline consumption. The additional poLLutants generated
by burnin!] the extra gasoline includes about 26,000 pounds of VOC's (voLatiLe organic
carbons), 35,000 pounds of NOx, and 1,800 pounds of toxic air poLLutants (TAP's). In
addition, over 10,200,000 pounds of extra CO2 are generated by burning the additional fueL.
CO2 is a i]reenhouse !]as that is associated with gLobaL warming.
The above environmental damage is not the only cost that can be attributed to the stop
signs. If the average resident makes one trip up and down Sapphire Street per day, and each
stop delays the trip by 15 seconds, the wasted time is over 6 hours per year per person.
Given 4000 round trips per day, the amount of wasted time is over 36,500 hours annuaLLy.
This is non-productive time for those who are seLf-empLoyed and a Loss of time with friends
and family for others.
Since the city's data indicate that the stop signs can not be justified and since the stop signs
are harmful to the environment, I believe that the city should remove the stop signs. PLease
contact me if you have any questions regarding the above information. I Live at 8099 Jennet
Street in Atta Loma and I can be reached at (909) 980-5451.
SincereLy,
Robert J. Campagna
Rancho Cucamonga, Traffic - Stop Signs http://www.ci.rancho_cucamonga.ca.us/engr_pubworks/stoPsign-h~
Stop Signs
WHY DON'T THEY PUT IN MORE STOP SIGNS?
A stop sign is one of our most valuable and effective control devices when used at the right place
and under the right conditions. It is intended to help drivers and pedestrians at an intersection
decide who has the right-of-way.
One common misuse of stop signs is to arbitrarily interrupt through traffic, either by causing it to
stop, or by causing such an inconvenience as to force the traffic to use other routes. Where stop
signs are installed as "nuisances" or "speed breakers," there is a high incidence of intentional
violation. In those locations where vehicles do stop, the speed reduction is effective only in the
immediate vicinity of the stop sign, and frequently speeds are actually higher between
intersections. For these reasons, it should not be used as a speed control device.
A school crossing may look dangerous for children to use, causing parents to demand a stop sign
to halt traffic. Now a vehicle which had been a problem for 3 seconds while approaching and
passing the intersection becomes a problem for a much longer period. A situation of indecision is
created as to when to cross as a pedestrian or when to start as a motorist. Normal gaps in traffic
through which crossings could be made safely no longer exist. An intersection which previously
was not busy now looks like a major intersection. It really isn't -- it just looks like it. It doesn't
even look safer, and it usually isn't.
Most drivers are reasonable and prudent with no intention of maliciously violating traffic
regulations; however, when an unreasonable restriction is imposed, it may result in flagrant
violations. In such cases, the stop sign can create a false sense of security in a pedestrian and an
attitude of contempt in a motorist. These two attitudes can and often do conflict with tragic
results.
Well-developed, nationally recognized guidelines help to indicate when such controls become
necessary. These guidelines take into consideration, among other things, the probability of vehicles
arriving at an intersection at the same time, the length of time traffic must wait to enter, and the
availability of safe crossing opportunities.
INSTITUTE OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS
REPRINTED BY THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
12/23/1999 2:03
1 of 2
Alphabetical Listing
of Petition Signers
and Copies of the
Signed Petition
Petitioners to Remove All-Way Stops
Surname Given name Street Address City State Zip Phone
Adamson Eleanor 8159 Vinmar Ct. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-484-1956
Adamson Willie 8159 Vinmar Ct. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-484-1956
Ahmed Imtiaz 8198 Hillside Rd. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-466-4342
Ahmed Suraiya 8198 Hillside Rd. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-466-4342
Allyn David B. 8239 Whirlaway St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-476-1925
Allyn Lea 8239 Whirlaway St. Alia Loma CA 91701 909-476-1925
Alten Cindy 8557 Hillside Rd. Alia Lema CA 91701 909-941-6914
Alvafez Anthony 5469 Pearl St. Alia Loma CA 91701 909-987-6150
Angelini Gina 8080 Orchard St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-987-2281
Angelini Ken 8080 Orchard St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-987-2281
Aramayo Aida 5249 Carol Ave. Alta Loma CA 91701
Arlde Kevth 5618 Topaz Alta Loma CA 91701 909-989-7477
Aubert Judith E. 8189 Whirlaway Alta Loma CA 91701 909-980-1294
Aubert Ralph W. 8189 Whirlaway Alta Lema CA 91701 909-980-1294
Baima Anthony 8035 Orchard St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-980-2246
Baireh-Adalr Juan 8125 Hillside Rd. Alia Loma CA 91701 909-987-6454
Baker Paddy 6259 Indigo Ave. Alia Loma CA 91701 909-987-6769
Baker Roger 6259 lndigo Ave. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-987-6769
Baker Valaurie 8120 La Senda Rd. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-268-2688
Barnett Matthew 6198 Indigo Ave. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-945-9641
Beattie Arlyne J. 5732 Exeter Ct. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-948-1571
Beattie J.W. 5732 Exeter Ct. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-948-1571
Beck Gary 9785 Cinch Ring Lane Alta Loma CA 91737 909-989-6985
Becket Julie 8586 Thoroughbred St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-948-5973
Beltlet Adrienna 6069 Napa Ave. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-987-9451
Bell Chris 7980 Orchard Alta Loma CA 91701 909-980-3181
Bell Loft 7980 Orchard Alta Loma CA 91701 909-980-3181
Benso Susan 9066 Laramie Alta Loma CA 91737 909-483-9964
Bist Lillian 5520 Vinmar Alia Loma CA 91701 909-987-8180
Bjorkland Ed 7965 N. Pearl St. Alia Loma CA 91701 909-989-7680
Blackman Brandon 8069 Jennet St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-941-0850
Blackman Chad 8069 Jennet St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-941-0850
Blackman Dan 8069 Jennet St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-941-0850
Blackman Pari 8069 Jennet St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-941-0850
Blackman Wes 8069 Jennet St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-941-0850
Blake Susan 8160 Rosebud St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-989-5943
Boatman Susan M. 6040 Aquamarine Alta Loma CA 91701 909-945-3058
Bohne Steve W. 8120 La Senda Rd. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-205-9707
Bonser Raymond O. Jr. 7965 Orchard St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-987-2777
Booth Linda 5401 Vinmar Ave. Alta Loma CA 91701
Bowden Gary 8129 Thoroughbred St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-981-1500
Bowden Lisa 8129 Thoroughbred St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-981-1500
Boyd Marie 9480 Hillside Rd. Alta Loma CA 91737 909-980-3285
Bradley Sherry 9944 Roberds Ct. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-987-7756
Brady David 8456 Thoroughbred Alia Loma CA 91701 909-987-9965
Brady Shari 8456 Thoroughbred Alta Loma CA 91701 909-987-9965
Bremer Chris 6083 Sard St. Alia Loma CA 91701 909-944-8416
Bremer Debbie " 6083 Sard St. Alia Loma CA 91701 909-944-8416
Page 1
Petitioners to Remove All-Way Stops
Bremer Steve 6083 Sard St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-944-8416
Brodie Angela 8205 Whirlaway St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-989-2354
Brodie Nancy A. 8205 Whirlaway St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-989-2354
Brodie Peter E. 8205 Whiffaway St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-989-2354
Brotzman Stephanie 5242 Sapphire St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-980-9947
Brown James A. 8320 Vicara Dr. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-989-2441
Brown Kathy L. 5351 Peridot Ave. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-989-2468
Brown Robert W. 5351 Peridot Ave. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-989-2468
Brown Traci 5351 Peridot Ave. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-989-2468
Brown Kim 5351 Peridot Ave. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-989-2468
Bryant C.M. 8064 Hillside Rd. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-980-2473
Bryant R.D. 8064 Hillside Rd. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-980-2473
Bryla Theodore A. 5700 Drexel Ct. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-941-8058
Burright Scott 8060 Orchard St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-466-6563
Busam Brad 1486 Orido P1. Alta Loma CA 91784 909-981-5503
Byme Patricia D. 7999 Gardenia Ave. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-989-1454
Byme Patrick 7999 Gardenia Ave. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-989-1454
Byrne Rory S. 7999 Gardenia Ave. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-989-1454
Cabral Joe 8780 19th St Alta Loma CA 91701
Cabrera Joyce 8436 Vicara Dr. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-989-7967
Cagigas Cesar F. 6915 Layton St. AIm Loma CA 91701 909-989-6597
Cagigas Susan E. 6915 Layton St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-989-6597
Campagna Janet K. 8099 Jennet St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-980-5451
Campagna Robert J. 8099 Jennet St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-980-5451
Carlson Chris 10413 Carrari St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-987-8648
Carroll James M. 5425 Jasper St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-980-2578
Carroll Phyllis 5425 Jasper St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-980-2578
Carter Barbara M. 10350 Baseline Rd. #60 Alta Loma CA 91701 909-484-9043
Castillo Raul 2232 Deinice St. E1 Monte CA 626-444-8991
Castro Janet 6084 Della Ave. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-989-7718
Chaffee Jerry 6228 Quartz St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-483-9760
Chaffee Val 6228 Quartz St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-483-9760
Chastain Kirk 5631 Jasper St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-987-5041
Chilson James 8531 La Senda Ct. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-987-1858
Chilson Sally 8531 La Senda Ct. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-987-1858
Clark Alyson 5717 Peridot Ave. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-989-6738
Clement Richard 7946 Orchard St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-484-9426
Clements Wyndee 7945 Gardenia Alta Loma CA 91701 909-987-5519
Cochran Bret 8005 Hillside Rd. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-944-8823
Colby Jolene 5723 Turquoise Ave. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-989-9590
Colonna Katie 5326 Carol Ave. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-944-5040
Colonna Kyle 5326 Carol Ave. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-944-5040
Colonna Kyrstie 5326 Carol Ave. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-944-5040
Cook Isaac 6086 Napa Alta Loma CA 91701 909-987-5987
Cook Margaret 6086 Napa Alta Loma CA 91701 909-987-5987
Coplin Liisa 5556 Dresden St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-989-9737
Cowan Diana B. 8320 Vicara Dr. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-989-2441
Cox Carl 8095 Hillsode Rd. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-987-5495
Cox Chris " 5927 Abajo Ct. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-987-4779
Page 2
Petitioners to Remove All-Way Stops
Cox John 5625 Vimmar Ave. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-948-1338
Cox Tina 8060 Gardenia Alta Loma CA 91701 909-980-2655
Craddick Clifton 8539 Orchard St. Atta Loma CA 91701 909-989-4041
Crane Rob 8331 Edwin St. R.C. CA 91730 909-981-1123
Crambaker Lesley 8563 Beechwood Dr. Alia Loma CA 91701 909-980-5704
Crambaker Timothy D. 8563 Beechwood Dr. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-980-5704
Culley Dennis 5739 Malachite Alta Loma CA 91737 909-989-7454
Dague Jim 7098 Agate AIm Loma CA 91701 909-948-1500
Daley Mark 1005 N. Center Dr. #4101 Ontario CA 91764 909-466-6428
Dam Sandy 10210 Baselhe Rd. Alia Loma CA 91737 909-987-3993
Davenport Jay 11145 Charleston St. Alia Loma CA 91701 909-483-9738
Davis Amy 8272 Sunflower Ave. Alia Loma CA 91701 909-987-1447
Davis Gary R. 6824 London Ave. Alia Loma CA 91701 909-945-1896
Davis Jeannie 8272 Sunflower Ave. Alia Loma CA 91701 909-987-1447
DeCourcey Mike 8255 Hillside Rd. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-945-2015
DeCourcey Nancy 8255 Hillside Rd. Alia Loma CA 91701 909-945-2015
DeFazio Brenda A. 5775 Exeter Ct. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-989-9881
DeLaRosa Lisa 1810 Vineyard #B Ontario CA 91704 909-476-0152
Diaz Irving F. 9071 Camellia Dr. AIm. Loma CA 91701 909-484-4923
DiCenso Genevieve 1516 Shelley Ave. Upland CA 91786 909-946-5765
Dilonardo Angela 5730 Malachite Alta Loma CA 91737 909-944-3355
Dilonardo Dan A. 5730 Malachite Alta Loma CA 91737 909-944-3355
Dilonardo James 5730 Malachite Alta Loma CA 91737 909-944-3355
Dilonardo Sandra 5730 Malachite Alta Loma CA 91737 909-944-3355
Diomedes Susan B. 8690 Dresden Ct. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-980-0509
Dorninick Samuel A. 6009 Moonstone Ave. R.C. CA 91701 909-987-1179
Dooman Caroline 9800 Baseline Rd. AIm. Loma CA 91701 909-481-5233
Dorger Barbara 8079 Thoroughbred St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-941-8445
Drew Russ 6415 Beryl Alta Loma CA 91701 909-987-6578
Drew Maureen 6415 Beryl Alta Loma CA 91701 909-987-6578
Dunn Brandon 5727 Indigo Alta Loma CA 91701 909-989-7090
Duris Mike 8488 Pumalo Alta Loma CA 91701
Early Marion 5338 Peridot Ave. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-989-2494
Early Melinda 5712 Turquoise Ave. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-948-8393
Eddy Michael 5410 Galloway St. Alia Loma CA 91701 909-945-0051
Eddy Terri 5410 Galloway St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-945-0051
Edison Tina 8225 Beechwood Dr. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-945-9306
Edmon Regina 8566 Buggy Whip Alta Loma CA 91701 909-226-3157
Ellison Mark 5375 Sapphire St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-481-5901
Emilio Barbara 10467 Gala Ave. Alia Loma CA 91701
Emilio Jerry 6254 Amberwood Alta Loma CA 91701 909-982-4030
Emilio Ralph 9800 Baseline Rd. Alia Loma d 91701 909-481-5233
Emilio Shirley 6254 Amberwood Alia Loma CA 91701 909-982-4030
Enriquez Eileen 6097 Malachite Ave. Alta Loma CA 91737 909-945-9532
Epperson Trever 7969 Rosebud St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-987-6664
Ferguson Ruth 8117 Inspiration Dr. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-870-2167
Fleming Allison 8010 Rosebud Alia Loma CA 91701 909-987-3935
Fleming Carol 8010 Rosebud Alia Loma CA 91701 909-987-3935
Fleming Dale " 8010 Rosebud Alta Loma CA 91701 909-987-3935
Page 3
Petitioners to Remove All-Way Stops
Fleming Eric 8010 Rosebud Alta Loma CA 91701 909-987-3935
Fleming Laura 10118 Freeport Ct. San Diego CA 92128 858-538-6447
Fordon Alice 7915 Appaloosa Ct. Alta Loma CA 91701
Fordon Bruce 7915 Appaloosa Ct. Alta Loma CA 91701
Fordon Keith 7915 Appaloosa Ct. Alta Loma CA 91701
Fordon Larry 7915 Appaloosa Ct. Alta Loma CA 91701
Fordon Martin 7915 Appaloosa Ct. Alta Loma CA 91701
Foster Deborah A. 8171 Bella Vista Alta Loma CA 91701 909-982-1807
Foster Jim 6134 Indigo Ave. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-989-9795
Foster Kathleen J. 6134 Indigo Ave. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-989-9795
Fredriksen Ron 8509 Orchard St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-987-5308
French Henry 8380 Almond Alta Loma CA 91701 909-373-1050
Fritchey John D. 7672 Cartilia Ave. R.C. CA 91730 909-989-3240
Fritz Carole 5390 Galloway St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-941-8118
Gagne Raymond M. Jr. 32 San Antonio Falls Mr. Baldy CA 91759 909-946-2136
Gardner Lillian 7906 Appaloosa Ct. Alta Loma CA 91701
Gardy Margaret 5738 Indigo Ave. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-987-3600
Gardy Walt 5738 Indigo Ave. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-987-3600
Garlow Jani 5520 Sapphire St. Alia Loma CA 91701 909-987-1197
Garner Matt 8650 Orchard Alta Loma CA 91701 909-989-7282
Gates William D. 5355 Turquoise Ave. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-980-0787
Gaylor Deanna 7975 Pearl St. Alia Loma CA 91701 909-466-9664
Gentry Gene 8626 Vicara Dr. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-989-7218
Giacchetti Danielle 5276 Sapphire St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-945-9972
Giacchetti Louis A. 5276 Sapphire St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-945-9972
Giao Lori 11245 Bethany Dr. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-989-0645
Gibson Robert 6056 Della Alta Loma CA 91701
Gibson Robert S. 6056 Della Alia Loma CA 91701
Gigliotti Michael 10566 Gala Ave. Alia Loma CA 91701 909-987-0179
Gilbert Jeanette 8223 Whirlaway St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-989-9218
Gilbert Michael 8223 Whirlaway St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-989-9218
Gill Melinda 6268 Amberwood Dr. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-484-8648
Glasson Darlene 9007 Alta Loma Dr. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-987-4414
Gomez Anthony R. 5339 Peridot Ave. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-989-2952
Gomez Judy 5339 Peridot Ave. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-989-2952
Gonzalez David 8326 Banyan Alia Loma CA 91701 909-466-0670
Gonzalez Debbie 8035 Rosebud St. Alia Loma CA 91701 909-989-9867
Gonzalez Maria 8326 Banyan St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-466-0670
Goodell T.A. 8233 Jennet St. Alia Loma CA 91701 909-980-6037
Graft Barbara 8166 Vinmar Ct. Alia Loma CA 91701
Graham Brett 8425 Lemon Alta Loma CA 91701 909-989-4250
Grant Robert M. 5521 Vinmar Alia Loma CA 91701 909-987-1538
Grant Sharon 5521 Vinmar Alta Loma CA 91701 909-987-1538
Grant Wilma 5521 Vinmar Alia Loma CA 91701 909-987-1538
Grosenbach Fred Jr. 5898 Turquoise Ave. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-987-8676
Grosenbach Fred Sr. 5898 Turquoise Ave. Aha Loma CA 91701 909-987-8676
Guerrucci Femando 6421 Peridot Ave. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-980-5446
Guidos Deborah 6163 Napa Alia Loma CA 91701 909-989-2966
Gway Jeff " 5804 Turquoise Ave. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-980-1031
Page 4
Petitioners to Remove All-Way Stops
Hahn Cathy 8079 Banyan St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-944-0386
Haines John 8130 La Senda Alta Loma CA 91701 909-989-6239
Hanna Joseph D. 5886 Turquoise Ave. Alia Loma CA 91701 909-989-2346
Hanna Joseph M. 5886 Turquoise Ave. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-989-2346
Hanna Kathleen 5886 Turquoise Ave. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-989-2346
Hanna Marjorie K. 5886 Turquoise Ave. Alia Loma CA 91701 909-989-2346
Hanson Allen 5418 Jasper St. Alia Loma CA 91701 909-989-4152
Hardyman Keyin 5622 Jasper Alia Loma CA 91701 909-481-5175
Haring James 5849 Jasper Alta Loma CA 91701 909-945-5802
Harre James 8069 Gardenia Ave. Alia Loma CA 91701
Harre Mrs. James 8069 Gardenia Ave. Alia Loma CA 91701
Harsen Greg 6055 Napa Ave. Alia Loma CA 91701 909-944-9724
Harsen Patricia 6055 Napa Ave. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-944-9724
Hecker Bruce 8471 Pumalo Aim Loma CA 91701 909-627-9807
Herher Christha R. 16844 Merion Ln. Fontaria CA 92336 909-574-0872
Herher Eric 224 E. Princeton St. Ontario CA 91764 909-467-0312
Herber Lawrence J. 5292 Sapphire St. Alia Loma CA 91701 909-987-5185
Herbet Lucy S. 5292 Sapphire St. Alia Loma CA 91701 909-987-5185
Herher Phil 263 Golden Carriage Ln. Pomona CA 91767 909-392-5812
Herber-Ferrari Margie 1522 Shelley Ave. Upland CA 91786 909-920-3530
Heredia Monica 6199 Peridol Ave. Alia Loma CA 91701
Heruandez Gary R. 6259 Sunstone Ave. Alia Loma CA 91701 909-989-6489
Heruandez Kelli 7905 Hillside Rd. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-484-4474
Hernandez Max 7905 Hillside Rd. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-484-4474
Herrin Mary 5413 Turquoise Ave. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-481-2903
Hickman Deanna 5520 Vinmar Alta Loma CA 91701 909-987-8180
Hickman Paul 5520 Vimmar AIm Loma CA 91701 909-987-8180
Higgins Dave 5371 Topaz St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-980-1855
Hines Mary 5432 Sard St. Alta Loma CA 91701
Hinkle Carol 6275 Celestite Ave. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-989-1407
Hite Blake 8548 Hunter Dr. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-481-0443
Hoch Matt 6314 Amberwood Dr. Alia Loma CA 91701 909-945-1558
Holloway Jack 9393 Valley View St. Alia/coma CA 91737 909-980-0398
Holmes Stacy 8020 Orchard Alta Loma CA 91701 909-980-9281
Holmes Wyn 8020 Orchard Alia Loma CA 91701 909-980-9281
Holzberger David 7964 Gardenia Ave. Alia Loma CA 91701 909-989-6729
Holzberger Lisa 7964 Gardenia Ave. Alia Loma CA 91701 909-989-6729
Holzberger Mary 7964 Gardenia Ave. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-989-6729
Hoverman Robert 5401 Jasper St. Alia Loma CA 91701 909-944-7776
Howell Don 11118 Donnelly St. R.C. CA 91701 909-941-7067
Hunt Keith 8190 Orchard St. Alia Loma CA 91701 909-987-3000
Hunt Sharon 8190 Orchard St. Alia Loma CA 91701 909-987-3000
Hurwit Brooke 8439 Hillside Rd. Alia/coma CA 91701 909-987-6677
Ierma Jennifer 91163 Exeter Ave. Montclair CA 91763 909-988-0063
Jarviner Clay 8713 Rancho St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-945-9609
Judson Heidi 7781 Archibald Ave. #13 R.C. CA 91730 909-483-0831
Karle Theo 8290 Orchard Alta Loma CA 91701 909-980-8970
Kaylor Brad 8353 Thoroughbred St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-980-8313
Keele Janna ,' 8301 La Senda Rd. Alia Loma CA 91701 909-948-6927
Page 5
Petitioners to Remove All-Way Stops
Keele Michael 8301 La Senda Rd. Alia Loma CA 91701 909-948-6927
Kelly Edwin 8115 Hillside Rd. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-987-3690
Kent Lisa 8t65 Orchard St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-980-5994
Kephart Ryan 8359 Pumalo St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-932-0618
Kems John 7959 Surrey Lane Alta Loma CA 91701 909-987-6689
Kipness Robert 7990 Orchard St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-987-7404
Kiser John 8060 Gardenia Alta Loma CA 91701 909-980-2655
Klein Kirk 8004 Gardenia Alta Loma CA 91701
Klhnaitis Martin 5039 Via Serena Alta Loma CA 91701 909-989-1509
Knuttel Helen M. 5439 Sard St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-987-8238
Knuttel James M. 5439 Sard St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-987-8238
Knuttel William 5439 Sard St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-987-8238
Konop Joe 6041 Indigo Alta Loma CA 91701 909-989-5816
Kopitzke Georgia 5951 Klusman Ave. Alta Loma CA 91737 909-980-4582
Kopitzke Leon 5951 Klusman Ave. Alia Loma CA 91737 909-980-4582
Kopp Jerry 8370 Pumalo St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-989-3446
Kristy Edward 5791 Cameo Alta Loma CA 91701 909-987-7464
Kropik Gary 9443 Whirlaway Ln. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-989-3242
Kropik Raearm 9443 Whirlaway Ln. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-989-3242
Lakey Loft L. 8286 Thoroughbred St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-989-4570
Lakey Ronald L. 8286 Thoroughbred St. Alia Loma CA 91701 909-989-4570
Larsen Knut H. 5191 Sapphire St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-987-5968
LaValley Joseph 6147 Columbus Ct. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-945-0048
Leabo Ed 5761 Exeter Ct. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-980-6569
Leabo Patricia 5761 Exeter Ct. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-980-6569
Leavitt Tina 5565 Pearl St. Alia Loma CA 91701 909-484-0076
Lee Connie 5407 Sard St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-989-5561
Lee James S. 5407 Sard St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-989-5561
"=~=="Lee-Mitchell Diarma L. 5271 Turquoise Ave. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-987-4308
Lemay Liesel A. 8229 Rosebud St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-980-3138
Leonard David A. 8153 Inspiration Alta Loma CA 91701 909-987-7313
Leonard Sharon E. 8153 Inspiration R.C. CA 91701 909-987-7313
Lewis Dusty 5617 Carol Ave. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-945-9670
Lewis Keyin 8149 Surrey Ln. Alta Loma CA 91701
Lewis Kimberly J. 5617 Carol Ave. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-945-9670
Lewis Nola 8149 Surrey Ln. Alta Loma CA 91701
Lewis Wendy 5617 Carol Ave. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-945-9670
Liang Albert 5407 Sard St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-989-5561
Liang Mary Moon 5407 Sard St. Alia Loma CA 91701 909-989-5561
Lieera Benjamin A. 6164 Via Serena Alta Loma CA 91701 909-980-7619
Licera Frocy 608 E. 'E' St. Ontario CA 91764 909-980-7619
Licera Jharvis 6164 Via Serena Alia Loma CA 91701 909-980-7619
Lieera Rommel 6164 Via Serena Alia Loma CA 91701 909-980-7619
Lieera Viad 6164 Via Serena Alta Loma CA 91701 909-980-7619
Lindnet Petra 5789 Exeter Ct. Alia Loma CA 91701 909-941-6696
Lindner Steve 5789 Exeter Ct. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-941-6696
Lombardo Peter B. 8175 Vinmar Ct. Alia Loma CA 91701 909-987-7082
Lombardo Rosemary 8175 Vimmar Ct. Alia Loma CA 91701 909-987-7082
/concar Philip " 6040 Sunstone Ave. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-987-4270
Page 6
Petitioners to Remove All-Way Stops
Long Bill 5471 Sard St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-484-3385
Long Roberta A. 5471 Sard St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-484-3385
Long Ron 8055 Orchard St. AIm Loma CA 91701 909-989-3003
Lopez Daniel 6120 Balboa Alta Loma CA 91701 909-989-6003
Lopez David J. 8074 Gardenia Ave. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-945-7788
Ly Jennie 5612 Malachite Ave. Alta Loma CA 91737 909-980-8430
Lyman Gregg 8339 Moon Ct. Atta Loma CA 91701 909-987-8755
Madueno Rudy 6268 Amberwood Dr. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-484-8648
Malloy Janelie 8049 Rosebud St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909466-1807
Malloy Pat 8049 Rosebud St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-466-1807
Mugraft Thomas 5211 Sapphire St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-466-0704
Margraft Victoria 52i 1 Sapphire St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-466-0704
Marin Hector 6163 Via Serena Alta Loma CA 91701 909-466-8160
Marin Jayne 6163 Via Serena Alta Loma CA 91701 909-466-8160
Marston Shelly 8051 Beechwood Dr. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-944-2706
Martin Dannette 8075 Orchard St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-987-3800
Martin Dennis 8075 Orchard St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-987-3800
Martin Douglas H. 5457 Turquoise Ave. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-944-3966
Manin Joe G. 7631 Haven R.C. CA 91730 909-923-0866
Martin Marilyn K. 5457 Turquoise Ave. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-944-3966
Manin Weston 5457 Turquoise Ave. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-944-3966
Maninez Joey 5875 Welsh Ct. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-709-1490
Martinez Raymond 5872 Turquoise Ave. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-982-3590
Maninez Valeria 5875 Welsh Ct. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-987-9544
Martres Patricia 5913 Napa Ave. Alta Loma CA 91701
Mathews Ann 8100 Orchard St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-987-1958
Mathews Robert 8100 Orchard St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-987-1958
Matthys Melvyn F. 5923 Layton St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-987-6747
May James 5404 Jasper St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-989-7012
May Lorraine 5404 Jasper St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-989-7012
Mayhew Athena 8118 Rosebud St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-941-9557
McCarson Matt 7915 Hillside Rd. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-980-1133
McClintock Henry 6616 Holly Oak Dr. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-987-7863
McGrail Susan 8729 Beechwood Alta Loma CA 91701 909-980-3329
McKee Mike 5868 Welsh Ct. R.C. CA 91701 909-980-0408
McMahan Mary Ann 8216 Sunflower Alta Loma CA 91701 909-944-8651
McNamara Linda 8182 Vimmar Ct. Alta Loma CA 91701
McWillian~ Kirnberly 5585 Pearl St. Alia Loma CA 91701 909-481-3962
Mikus Carole 4918 Crestview P1. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-989-9945
Miller Angela A. 8255 Whirlaway Alta Loma CA 91701 909-987-1301
Mitchell Michael S. 5271 Turquoise Ave. Alia Loma CA 91701 909-987-4308
Monroe Les 5572 Amethyst Alta Loma CA 91737 909-390-2059
Montgomery Karen 5319 Peridot Ave. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-945-3084
Moore Max 8323 Orchard Alia Loma CA 91701 909-987-6727
Mormann Matthew 9197 Banyan Alta Loma CA 91701 909-932-0582
Morrison Bill 8198 Jennet St. Alia Loma CA 91701 909-987-4989
Mosely Greg 6114 Peridol Alia Loma CA 91701 909-945-2108
Mulligan Brian M. 5709 Turquoise Ave. Alia Loma CA 91701 909-989-6183
Mulligan Nancy C." 5709 Turquoise Ave. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-989-6183
Page 7
Petitioners to Remove All-Way Stops
Musella Mary 8509 Orchard Alta Loma CA 91701 909-987-5308
Myers Nancy 6120 Indigo Alta Loma CA 91701 909-466-5443
Myers Robert 6120 Indigo Alta Loma CA 91701 909-466-5443
Myers Ron 7266 Lesina P1. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-945-1346
Nesin Daniel J. 7955 Hillside Rd. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-987-4178
Nevarez Jesse J. 8146 Rosebud St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-944-1846
Nevarez Rita T. 8146 Rosebud St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-944-1846
Nielson Kathy S. 8037 Jennet Alta Loma CA 91701 909-944-5973
Palmet Calvin 8471 Hillside Rd. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-941-0850
Patiel Shoain 1898 Vimmar Ct. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-466-8748
Pecheur Deborah 6262 Celestite Ave. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-980-2860
Peelman Nick 8078 Crest View Ct. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-989-5678
Pennisi Joseph M. 8150 Inspiration Dr. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-484-9060
Permisi Victoria 8150 Inspiration Dr. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-484-9060
Perales Linda 5208 Sapphire St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-989-8429
Pertin Doris E. 8371 La Colina Dr. Alta Loma CA 91701
Perrin Richard 8371 La Colina Dr. Alta Loma CA 91701
Persico Lisa 8990 19th St. #331 Alta Loma CA 91701 909-941-6811
Philport Terry 5399 Galloway St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-941-9505
Philport William 5399 Galloway St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-941-9505
Pia Leon 6041 Carol Ave. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-544-1514
Proulx Cheryl D. 5866 Turquoise Ave. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-944-8745
Proulx Pat 5866 Turquoise Ave. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-944-8745
Pryor Lucinda L. 5350 Peridot Ave. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-989-8322
Pryor Ronald L. 5350 Peridot Ave. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-989-8322
Queen David 7905 Hillside Rd. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-987-5281
Queen Donna 7905 Hillside Rd. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-987-5281
Rahone Geoffrey L. 8572 Banyan St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-987-0383
Ramirez Elsa 8184 Hillside Rd. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-945-5684
Ramirez George 8184 Hillside Rd. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-945-5684
Randolph Barbara 8472 Vicara Dr. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-945-5482
Randolph Charles C. 8472 Vicara Dr. Aim Loma CA 91701 909-945-5482
Ranney Deborah 5439 Jasper St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-987-6776
Ranney Thomas P. 5439 Jasper St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-987-6776
Reano Charles 8374 Bella Vista Alta Loma CA 91701 909-989-9726
Reano Gall 8374 Bella Vista Alta Loma CA 91701 909-989-9726
Reese William R. 11309 Mountain View Dr. R.C. CA 91730 909-483-1346
Reeves Shirley 8551 Thoroughbred Alta Loma CA 91701 909-987-9463
Reynolds Dennis 5438 Sard St. Alta Loma CA 91701
Reynolds Dorothy 5438 Sard St. Alta Loma CA 91701
Rice Marcia 5661 Peridot Ave. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-989-0533
Richardson Bruce S. 5751 Peridot Alta Loma CA 91701 909-989-8037
Richardson M. 575i Peridot Alta Loma CA 91701 909-989-8037
Ripple Todd 6085 Napa AIm Loma CA 91701 909-980-6980
Roberrs Brenton E. 6356 Silverwood Alta Loma CA 91701 909-944-1695
Roberrs Candace 8393 Pumalo St. Alta Loma CA 91701
Roccatani Femando 10338 Hillside Rd. Alta Loma CA 91737 909-989-7072
Rodgers Marcia 5750 Sapphire St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-945-3434
Rojas Diego R. fl 8510 Orchard St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-476-1480
Page 8
Petitioners to Remove All-Way Stops
Roland Sharon 6029 San Felipe Ct. Alta Loma CA 91737 909-949-9675
Roman Ramon 8124 Peridot Ct. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-987-2302
Roy Cindy 9148 Vatilia Ct. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-989-1624
Rub Dennis 8071 Beechwood Dr. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-466-8640
Rybarczyk Don 6255 Celestite Ave. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-851-0806
Ryder Greg 5551 Vinmar Ave. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-981-5134
Ryder Pauline 5551 Vimmar Ave. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-981-5134
Salisbury Tom 6413 Layton St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-980-2831
Sanders Betty H. 5413 Turquoise Ave. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-476-0281
Sanders Kimberly 5413 Turquoise Ave. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-476-0281
Sanders Emile 5413 Turquoise Ave. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-476-0281
Sanrio Bee 6134 Via Serena Alta Loma CA 91701
Sarrio Raymond 6147 Via Serena Alta Loma CA 91701 909-987-1020
Saylot Cheryl 8257 Rosebud Alta Loma CA 91701 909-620-3083
Saylot M.D. 8257 Rosebud Alta Loma CA 91701 909-398-7000
Scavarda John 5372 Via Serena Alta Loma CA 91701 909-987-0271
Schafer Gary A. 8788 Hidden Farm Rd. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-989-8781
Schafer James 8823 Knollwood R.C. CA 91730 909-980-4622
Schafer John 6870 Cameo St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-481-6275
Schaffer Larry 8374 Almond St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-987-2323
Scheidler James W. 6848 Darry Ct. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-989-9901
Schoening David 6388 Jasper Alta Loma CA 91701 909-945-3341
Schwartz Bill 8093 Banyan St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-944-7110
Schwartz Elissa 8093 Banyan St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-944-7110
Scocchio Roger 8345 Jennet St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-980-1916
Seaman Samuel 7405 Saddle Rd. #C R.C. CA 91730 909-980-2657
Seidel David 8142 Hillside Rd. Alia Loma CA 91701 909-989-6377
8haffer Tom 8361 Vicara Alia Loma CA 91701 909-944-9015
Shea John 7955 Orchard St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-980-9375
Sheashy Kim 9108 Reales St. Alta Loma CA 91737 909-989-9422
Shirl Randall L. 8173 V~irlaway St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-987-2968
Signor Jeff 8528 Salina St. R.C. CA 91730 909-920-9016
Skinner Shaun 8227 Bella Vista Alia Loma CA 91701 909-466-3912
Smith Debbie 5326 Carol Ave. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-944-5040
Smith Gladys 5700 Fox Ct. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-948-0876
Smith Jim 5208 Sapphire St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-989-8429
Smith Raymond 5267 Sapphire St. Alia Loma CA 91701 909-989-4835
Smith Ronald 5326 Carol Ave. Aim Loma CA 91701 909-944-5040
Smith Rosemary 5267 Sapphire St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-989-4835
Sotro Chris 598 Lurline Ct. Upland CA 91784 909-981-3545
Spain William V. III 9680 San Bemardino Rd. Alia Loma CA 91730 909-980-1473
Spencer Randall 10149 Sun Valley Dr. Alia Loma CA 91737 909-945-3534
Spemagel Charles 5327 Carol Ave. Alia Loma CA 91701 909-945-9305
Spolsdoff Cheri 8344 Pumalo Alia Loma CA 91701 909-944-5947
Spolsdoff Eric 8344 Pumalo Alia Loma CA 91701 909-944-5947
Stewart Barbara L. 5038 Via Paraiso Alia Loma CA 91701 909-989-7682
Stone Darryl 5710 Fox Ct. Alia Loma CA 91701 909-944-5363
Stone Michael F. 9999 Foothill BIrd. #15 R.C. CA 91730 909-980-3695
Stuffiebean David " 6245 Celestite Alia Loma CA 91701 909-980-0190
Page 9
Petitioners to Remove All-Way Stops
Stuf~ebean Linda 6245 Celestite Alta Loma CA 91701 909-980-0190
Swearingen Micah 7940 Beechwood Dr. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-987-8105
Swearhagen Ron 7940 Beechwood Dr. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-987-8105
Sweetland Deborah J. 6248 Brandy PI. Alta Loma CA 91737 909-466-7988
SwiR Nancy C. 5660 Peridot Ave. Alia Loma CA 91701 909-987-9355
Swift Richard H. 5660 Peridot Ave. Alia Loma CA 91701 909-987-9355
Taylor Steve R. 8160 Orchard St Alta Loma CA 91701 909-989-3876
Thomas Gay 8135 Orchard St. Alia Loma CA 91701 909-987-8503
Thomas James M. 5421 Pearl St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-987-7050
Thomas Steve 8108 Surrey Ln. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-945-2046
Thompson Ralph 8661 Beechwood Dr. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-945-1355
Thompson Tom 1040 Weber St. Pomona CA 91768 909-622-3905
Thornton Aurora 6113 Sapphire St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-941-0132
Thornton Charles 6113 Sapphire St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-941-0132
Tobin Lisa 8232 Hillside Rd. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-944-5194
Toll Rich 11537 Palm Meadows Dr. R.C. CA 91730 909-466-4837
Torres Monica T. 9061 Alta Loma Dr. Alta Loma CA 91701
Trahan Gordon 7561 Buena Vista R.C. CA 91730 909-985-0059
Tretola Amber 8198 Jennet St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-987-4989
Turner Frank 8454 Cedarwood Lane R.C. CA 91730 909-946-6334
Uncle Kevin 8229 Rosebud St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-980-3138
Uncle Keyin B. 8229 Rosebud St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-980-3138
Underwood Jill M. 8100 Sunflower Ave. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-966-3526
Underwood John 8100 Sunflower Ave. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-966-3526
Valenza Robert J. 5775 Exeter Ct. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-484-9266
Watson Bernese 5288 Galloway St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-944-0803
Watson Carl E. 5288 Galloway St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-944-0803
Watson David B. 5288 Galloway St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-944-0803
Way Catherine 5555 Turquoise Ave. Alia Loma CA 91701 909-989-5437
Way George 5555 Turquoise Ave. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-989-5437
Wenby Ronald 8034 Thoroughbred Alta Loma CA 91701 909-989-0188
Werbick Genevieve 8436 Vicara Dr. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-989-6709
Weston Kim 5455 Jasper St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-989-3020
Whisenand Christine 8233 Jennet St. Alta Loma CA 91701
Whitso Burnie L. 5038 Via Paraiso Alta Loma CA 91701 909-989-7682
Wilds Angeles B. 9850 19th St. Alta Loma CA 91737 909-483-1910
Willborn Nathan 7950 Orchard Alta Loma CA 91701 909-205-8737
Wilson Shelley 6810 Jasper Alta Loma CA 91701 909-987-7994
Witley Gary 8272 Thoroughbred Alia Loma CA 91701 909-481-6646
Wolfe Duane 13031 Vista R.C. CA 91739 909-899-1181
Wolfe James E. 8055 Gardenia Ave. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-980-4998
Wolski Tony 5380 Via Serena Alta Loma CA 91701 909-980-4023
Wolski Vickie 5380 Via Serena Alta Loma CA 91701 909-980-4023
Wolstein Rebecca 5383 Jasper St. Alia Loma CA 91701 909-941-1501
Woore Joseph G. 6138 Granite Ct. Alta Loma CA 91737 909-980-1873
Wormdahl Randy 10286 Coralwood Alta Loma CA 91701 909-227-5532
Yates Ashlee 8190 Orchard St. Alta Loma CA 91701 909-987-3000
Yates Dave 8190 Orchard St. Alia Loma CA 91701 909-987-3000
Page 10
Petition for the Removal
Of Stop Signs on Sapphire Street
at Highland and Lemon/Marble.
Petition:
We, the undersigned, hereby request that the 4-way stops at Sapphire and Highland Ave.
and at Sapphire and Lemon/Marble be returned to 2-way stop status as they were prior to
the start of construction of the Carnelian Ave. freeway bridge.
Name: (printed) Stxeet Address Signature:
City, State Zip Date:
Phone:
Name: (proted) Street Address i a e'
qz/g--eT?3 A-IfaL,cr~pl M q/7C, I / / ao[ o l
'Date: '
~ F ~ f. ~L77t l, ol-rA~e~ 91701 /%,~d
, '7-
Name: (printed) S~eet Address i a e'
Phone: I ' ' City, State Zip
CiW, State Zip /
Petition for the Removal
Of Stop Signs on Sapphire Street
at Highland and Lemen/Marble.
Petition:
We, the undersigned, hereby request that the 4-way stops at Sappkire and Highland Ave.
and at Sapphire and Lemon/Marble be returned to 2-way stop stares as they were prior to
the start of construction of the Carnelian Ave. freeway bridge.
Name: (printed) Street Address Si ature:_~}~_J
Phone." "' City, State Zip ' ' ' '
qc~-q~o qUd !~CT/t Cc,'n~ , C4 ~'~o/[pate:/"iS-
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Phone: i tare i Date:
N?Lgvd, _ street,ddre,,
Name: (printed) Street Address Si nature:
Phone:t City, State Zip a e:
Phone: City, Sta?e Zip Date:
%99 -~gf/-6&9~ ,,¢l,/o, Lc~, (°~ ?fTo/ I~gc - ---ol
Street Address ~a re'
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
F'
Petition for the Removal
Of Stop Signs on Sapphire Street
at Highland and LemonfMarble.
Petition:
we, the undersigned, hereby request that the 4-way stops at Sapphire and Highland Ave.
and at Sapphire and Lemon/Marble be returned to 2-way stop stares as they were prior to
the start of construction of the Carnelian Ave. freeway bridge.
Nm,,_~.rinted) Street Address
Name; ~ited) S~eet Ad&ess S~~
Phone: Ci~, State Zip
PhoieF ~ ' , Ci~, State~ip
Phone: t d CiW, State z yate:
N~e: ~ted) S~eet Ad&ess N i e:
Phone: , ,
Petition for the Remova~
Of Stop Signs on Sapphire Street
at Highland and Lemon/Marble.
Petition:
We, the undersigned, hereby request that the 4-way stops at Sapphire and Highland Ave.
and at Sapphire and Lemon/Marble be returned to 2-way stop status as they were prior to
the start of construction of the Carnelian Ave. freeway bridge.
Name: (p~ted) S~eet Ad~ess /' S'i~~
Phone: Ci~, State Zip D~:
Name: ~ted) S~ect Ad~ess '~
Phone: Ci~, State Zip Date:
~o7-~7- ~ S5 q~ ~ C~ /~ ao-ol
' Si~amre:/
Phone: Ci~, State Zip Date: ~
Petition for the Removal
Of Stop Signs on Sapphire Street
at Highland and Lemon/Marble.
Petition:
We, the undersigned, hereby request that the 4-way stops at Sapphire and Highland Ave.
and at Sapphire and LemonFVlarble be returned to 2-way stop status as they were prior to
the start of construction of the Carnelian Ave. freeway bridge.
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone': City, State Zip Dhte:
~ Z T.,;. .3 y~ /a,/,/_,~ /.~,~ , ~4 ~2 ~o/ /.;o.o/
Stxeet Address
Phone: City, State Zip te:
Name: (printed) Street Address ' a e'
p~C~t City, State Zip Date:
phPoDn~.7'' q ~ City, State Zip Date:
qOq Q ~7 I~ Oi /9/il~- Lotsco t CI19
Name: (printed) Street Address i a re:
D "' ""'Z 7" ""
S~e'et Address i'
~ame? [printed) Signature' .
Phone: City State Zip Date:
iqd~f) c~ 7~r?4L4-~Lo,,,~
Y
Petition for the Removal
Of Stop Signs on Sapphire Street
at Highland and Lemon/Marble.
Petition:
We, the undersigned, hereby request that the 4-way stops at Sapphire and Highland Ave.
and at Sapphire and Lemon/Marble be returned to 2-way stop stares as they were prior to
the start of construction of the Carnelian Ave. freeway bridge.
Name: (printed) Street Address i~nZ__tur~:~
Plione: City, State Zip Dite:
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone:" ' City, State Zip Date:
qqq-,Sq4'/ ALT~ Lc~c-~A OA
Name: (printed) I Street Address i a re:
Phofie: City, State Zip 'IJate:" ~ ""
lavq)qFT-tt~;~i~ ~i.h C~,vxat Col. tll~ol l/i~7[ol
e' rin e Street Addre . ~ '
~P~one: City, State Zip . Date:
Name: (printed) Street Address I Sig~a~ e:
Plfone: City, State Zip ' Date:
· ' Street Address ' ' ·
Pho.e: :] ' ~ty, State ~p 3 , a
~G~-98"7-c3~c% ~lt. aLo.,,a7 C-A 917ol t/~a/i
Name: (printed) Street Address A~T~ cocq~t C,4.
'Po~' ~7~ -/q25' ,
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Phone: ~ i ~ i ' ' / ~
Petition for the Removal
Of Stop Signs on Sapphire Street
at Highland and Lemon/Marble.
Petition:
We, the undersigned, hereby request that the 4-way stops at Sapphire and Highland .Ave.
and at Sapphire and Lemon/Marble be returned to 2-way stop status as they were pnor to
the start of construction of the Carnelian Ave. freeway bridge.
Name: (printed) Street Address i n r '
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature/
Name: (printed) Street Address ~_~
l~hon~: City, Stale Zip Date: "'
N~e: ~ited) S~eet Ad~ess
. Ci~, State Zip
Phone:
~ ~j6~6/
Petition fer the Removal
Of Stop Signs on Sapphire Street
.. at Highland and Lemon/Marble.
Petition:
We, the undersigned, hereby request that the 4-way stops at Sapphire and Highland Ave.
and at Sapphire and Lemon/Marble be returned to 2-way stop status as they were prior to
the start of construction of the Carnelian Ave. freeway bridge.
Name: (printed) Street Address
! Phone: City, State Zip
Name: (printed) Street Address Si '
Phone: { City, State Zip Die:
ame: rin e Street Address S~.:
Name: (printed) Stre Ad,dr~s , ~67..~;'
Phone: City, State Zip ate.
Name: (printed) Stzeet Address Signa~ture:
(~
Phohe: CityCState Zip ' Date:
Name: (y~;,~d) Street Address Signa.mre:
Phone: ' '
City, State Zip
,4&rA Lc~, C// DZa/
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date."
9oI zf~-t-~qO( t4C77R {.,otcqA CA cI(2oI [-20-~.9{
Petition for the Removal
Of Stop Signs on Sapphire Street
at Highland and Lemon/Marble.
Petition:
We, the undersigned, hereby request that the 4-way stops at Sapphire and Highland Ave.
and at Sapphire and Lemon/Marble be returned to 2-way stop status as they were prior to
the start of construction of the Carnelian Ave. fleeway bridge.
Name: (printed) Stxeet Address
Name: (printed) Street Address Si~i
Date~
Phone: City, State Zip
N e: (pr~uted) S~eet Address / ~ re' "
Name: (printed) Street Address
Phon~. Ci_ty, State Zip Date:
Name: (p6~ted) Street Address S~
Phone: ~ City, State Zip ~/7 o t Date: ~"
a e: ' e Street Address
N ~t d>L~(,cf__' ~c~GO
PhBne: Ci?, State Zip Dat .
Petition for the Removal
Of Stop Signs on Sapphire Street
at Highland and Lemon/Marble.
Petition:
We, the undersigned, hereby request that the 4-way stops at Sapphire and Highland Ave.
and at Sapphire and Lemon/Marble be returned to 2-way stop status as they were prior to
the start of construction of the Carnelian Ave. freeway bridge.
Name: (printed) Street Address Signatur
Phone: City, State Zip ' ' ' ~Date:
Phone: City, Sta?e Zip Date:
Name: (printed) Street Address ,,.~r-~0 Si a e-
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) Street Address ~
Phone: City, State Zip a e'
Phone: ~ ' City, State Zip Date:
City, State Zip bate:
9Z'9-tt--S'/~2>~'z9/-- ,~-~,e~ L ~m,~ ,L~ q, T r ~
Nan~e: (p ' ted) Street Address ·
Phone: C{ty. State Zip ~ Date:k. ' \~
Petition for the Removal
Of Stop Signs on Sapphire Street
at Highland and Lemon/Marble.
Petition:
we, the undersigned, hereby request that the 4-way stops at Sapphire and Highland Ave.
and at Sapphire and Lemon/Marble be returned to 2-way stop status as they were prior to
the start of construction of the Carnelian Ave. freeway bridge.
Name: (printed) Street Address
Phone: Ci~, State Zip a e'
Phone: Ci~, State Zip
N~e: ~ted) S~eet Ad&ess Silage:
Phone: ' Ci~, State Zip ' ~:
Phone: Ci~, State Zip Date:
q~l-o~ y ~t~ ~ c~ ~tqo/ /.~ .~/
Name: ~ted) S~eet Ad&ess '~
Ci~, State Zip ~ Date:
Phone:
PHone~' Date:
Name: ~mted) S~eet Ad~ess Silage:
Phone: Ci~, S~te Zip Date:
Name: ~ted) S~eet Ad~ess Signa~re:
Phone: Ci~, State Zip Date:
Petition fer the Removal
Of Stop Signs on Sapphire Street
at Highland and Lemon/Marble.
Petition:
We, the undersigned, hereby request that the 4-way stops at Sapphire and Highland Ave.
and at Sapphire and Lemon/Marble be returned to 2-way stop status as they were prior to
the start of construction of the Carnelian Ave. freeway bridge.
Name: (printed) Street Address '~29
Phone: 'Date:
i, aei
Name: (printed) Street Address
Si ture:
Phone: City, State Zip bate:
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Date:
· tare i
PhOn~: ' J :
Phone: ' City, State ,Zip Date:
Name: (printed) Street Address i ' a re'
Phone: Ci~, State ZipS' ~ 'Date: '
F~e~ Ci~, State Zip ~te'
Petition for the Removal
Of Stop Signs on Sapphire Street
at Highland and Lemon/Marble.
Petition:
We, the undersigned, hereby request that the 4-way stops at Sapphire and Highland Ave.
and at Sapphire and Lemon/Marble be returned to 2-way stop status as they were prior to
the start of construction of the Carnelian Ave. freeway bridge.
e' fin Street Address
Name: (printed) A ' Street Ad&f~ F'D
Phone: City, State Zip "~t~:~.~../~
Name: (p~ted> street ~.d,e~a si ~,~e:
,~hn/~?~2--~s'8/50 6-,
Pl{one: ' City, State Zip D~te:
Name' (printed)
Phone: City, State Zip t~e: (,.__~
~79-e - ulna6 ~a-,v~ku cwc6 ~ ~t}~ i-~ - ~/.
Name: ~ted) t es
Phone: Ci~, State Zip
~oq .- ~1- q%~ ~Lq~ ~,~a ,
Phone: Ci~, State Zip
9~' 9~f?fy ~ur~ ~..
~ame: ~ted) S~eet Ad~ess
~Lo~e: Ci~, State Zip
' e'
~72~
Petition for the Removal
Of Stop Signs on Sapphire Street
at Highland and Lemon/Marble.
Petition:
We, the undersigned, hereby request that the 4-way stops at Sapphire and Highland Ave.
and at Sapphire and Lemon/Marble be returned to 2-way stop status as they were prior to
the start of construction of the Carnelian Ave. fi'eeway bridge.
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: ! City, State Zip
Name: (printed) ~eet Address
Phone: City, State Zip .Datex
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name~ (printeel) Stxeet Acldres~ S~gnatu~e~
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) Stzeet Address Signature:
Phone~ ~ty~ State ~p Date~
Petition for the Removal
Of Stop Signs on Sapphire Street
at Highland and Lemon/Marble.
Petition:
We, the undersigned, hereby request that the 4-way stops at Sapphire and Highland Ave.
and at Sapphire and Lemon/Marble be returned to 2-way stop status as they were prior to
the start of construction of the Carnelian Ave. fi'eeway bridge.
Name: (printed) Street Address i na e:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
~P7-on/~n~ ,iX r~4 X o/¢3, c4. /~.~,t-o /
~zg/r/IT 26'u A~fA-13a~r~ /- ,~;-o i
Name: (printed) Street Address AtLT'A-L-tl,ftlb i nare:
~Date:
Name: (printed) Street Address ~T: v~t ~'
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
City, State Zip 'Date: "~
Pb, one~
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Petition fo~' the Removal
Of Stop Signs on Sapphire Street
at Highland and Lemon/Marble.
Petition:
We, the undersigned, hereby request that the 4-way stops at Sapphire and Highland Ave.
and at Sapphire and Lemonf Marble be returned to 2-way stop status as they were prior to
the start of construction of the Carnelian Ave. f~eeway bridge.
[ Name: (printed) Street Address i a e:
Rot~-~r b/, ~atv^/ ,~a3'l PLt~/L~T Ate
Phone: City, State Zip ' Datd:
qf, O-2Va~ ./~c~ Lo~ ~ C,~
Phone: ! City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
~°q'c7~'3°¢:v' F, t- CJX fitS/
Name: (printed) Street Address ,/
?o) City, State Zip ~/ "Date:
Phone: City, State Zip Date'
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Petition for the Removal
Of Stop Signs on Sapphire Street
at Highland and Lemon/Marble.
Petition:
We, the undersigned, hereby request that the 4-way stops at Sapphire and Highland Ave.
and at Sapphire and Lemon/Marble be returned to 2-way stop status as they were prior to
the start of construction of the Carnelian Ave. fireeway bridge.
Name: (printed) S~eet Address
Phone! '
Name: (printed) Street Address
Phone: i tate i ~//9 /
ame: fin e Street Address ' '
Phone:' / i , a e i 'Da~:
Nanle~ Cpr[nted) ess
Phone: City, State Zip ' Date:
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone~ City, State 7ip Date~
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone~ City, State Zip Date~
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Petition for the Removal
Of Stop Signs on Sapphire Street
at Highland and Lemon/Marble.
Petition:
We, the undersigned, hereby request that the 4-way stops at Sapphixe and Highland Ave.
and at Sapphixe and Lemon/Marble be returned to 2-way stop status as they were prior to
the start of construction of the Carnelian Ave. freeway bridge.
e: ' Street Address Signature:
Phone: ' City, State Zip Date:
Phone: i e i D ·
Name: (printed) ., Street Address ' '
Phone: I City, State Zip
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) Street Ad&ess Signau.Lre:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (primed) Street Ad&ess Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Petition for the Removal
Of Stop Signs on Sapphire Street
at Highland and Lemon/Marble.
Petition:
We, the undersigned, hereby request that the 4-way stops at Sapphire and Highland Ave.
and at Sapphire and Lemonf Marble be returned to 2-way stop status as they were prior to
the start of construction of the Carnelian Ave. fleeway bridge.
.tinted) /~ Street Address ~f~/~,,._,_..____.
z,~~o ' ~ ~/?~7.. /
Phone: Ci , State Zxp a e' ·
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: ' City, State Zip Date:
~hone: City, State Z~.p Date:
N~me: (printed) Street Address
Phone: City, State Zip '~ Date:
qOcl cl~V::% O(.aqE" ,4/4-q [orpo., Q/q' q/7~/ i-/6 -crl
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) Street Address i Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Petition for the Removal
Of Stop Signs on Sapphire Street
at Highland and Lemon/Marble.
Petition:
We, the undersigned, hereby request that the 4-way stops at Sapphire and Highland Ave.
and at Sapphire and Lemon/Marble be returned to 2-way stop status as they were prior to
the start of construction of the Carnelian Ave. fi'eeway bridge.
Street Address i a re:
'Phone: , ' ' ate: h
P',~'7 5. ,,5z,-,~c- ')q~, (;.,,j,~.,,'. ..~,~
Phone: City; ~tate Zip Dat~
(c/e'J) c/Z;>:/'YSc/' ,414, d,,-~,, (); 9z'~r /-6-
"; e. - e Street'Xdaress -
Name: (printed) Street Address i na e:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Date:
' i a e i Date: '
~, ~ FIe ~, ~/o ~o.se b~ d 5~.
Phone: 4~ Ci~, State Zip Date:
Y
Petition for the Removal
Of Stop Signs on Sapphire Street
at Highland and Lemon/Marble.
Petition:
We, the undersigned, hereby request that the 4-way stops at Sapphire and Highland Ave.
and at Sapphire and Lemon/Marble be returned to 2-way stop status as they were prior to
the start of construction of the Carnelian Ave. fleeway bridge.
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
~hone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) Street Address Signatu~re:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip )ate:
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) Street Address Signatmre~
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Petition for the Removal
Of Stop Signs on Sapphire Street
at Highland and Lemon/Marble.
Petition:
We, the undersigned, hereby request that the 4-way stops at Sapphire and Highland Ave.
and at Sapphire and Lemon/Marble be returned to 2-way stop status as they were prior to
the start of construction of the Carnelian Ave. fleeway bridge.
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature,.
Phone: City, State Zip
,~/-~-7'4 /~omfl] ~ ~'/yaI /
_/ . .
/~Lle_F Fc~RT>~n/ 79/~PF~t-~o~R C'T
Phone: City, State Zip
Name: (printed) Street Address Signattire:
',~
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State ~'i]} Date:
lelo'~) ?l~-~el l~ All'o,, Lomo~, c4 ~117,;?1 I[1,-I/o/
~ame: '(printed) Street Addres, i e:
Phone: City, State Zip {If ,-
/q/~a /,~,a.
; S; '
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Petition for the Removal
Of Stop Signs on Sapphire Street
at Highland and Lemon/Marble.
Petition:
We, the undersigned, hereby request that the 4-way stops at Sapphire and Highland Ave.
and at Sapphire and Lemon/Marble be returned to 2-way stop status as they were prior to
the start of construction of the Carnelian Ave. freeway bridge.
Name: (printed) ~ Stxeet Address Signature:
Phone:
'~~ ~ ~ Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) Stxeet Addr'~"~ss Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) ~ Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
' ' '~ignature:
Name: (printed) Street Address
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) ' Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
~ Street Address Signature:
Name: (printed)
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) ~dress 'Signature:
?hone: City, State Zip Date:
Petition for the Removal
Of Stop Signs on Sapphire Street
at Highland and Lemon/Marble.
We, the undersigned, hereby request that the 4-way stops at Sapphire and Highland Ave.
and at Sapphire and Lemon/Marble be returned to 2-way stop stares as they were prior to
the start of construction of the Carnelian Ave. fireeway bridge.
; ame: rinte , Street Address ·
cto% c, tq~o~0C~-~?., Date: /-7--0
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) Street Address i nag: '
City, State Zip
Phone: City, State Zip Daf~i_ '7 Y
I Name: (printed) Street Address
Phone: City, State Zip c~ C1 '~e Date:
Phone: City, State Zip Date: '
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Phone: Ci~, State Zip Dat&
./-
Petition for the Removal
Of Stop Signs on Sapphire Street
at Highland and Lemon/Marble.
Petition:
We, the undersigned, hereby request that the 4-way stops at Sapphire and Highland Ave.
and at Sapphire and Lemon/Marble be returned to 2-way stop status as they were prior to
the start of construction of the Carnelian Ave. fxeeway bridge.
Name: (printed) Street Address i na r~:
Phone: City, State Zip Date: L/
C~of) 9~'~t- ,-/s-7o .,~/b~ c~ / C~ c2/7o/ 1-7-0/
Phone: City, State Zip 'Date:
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
~ "~treet Address Signature:
Name: (printed)
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) ~ Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Petition for the Removal
Of Stop Signs on Sapphire Street
at Highland and Lemon/Marble.
Petition:
We, the undersigned, hereby request that the 4-way stops at Sapphire and Highland Ave.
and at Sapphire and Lemon/Marble be returned to 2-way stop status as they were prior to
the start of construction of the Carnelian Ave. freeway bridge.
Name: (printed) Street Address i a :
City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) Street Address Si :
Phone: ' t i ,'Date:
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) Street Address ] Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Petition for the Removal
Of Stop Signs on Sapphire Street
at Highland and Lemon/Marble.
Petition:
We, the undersigned, hereby request that the 4-way stops at Sapphire and Highland Ave.
and at Sapphire and Lemon/Marble be returned to 2-way stop stares as they were prior to
the start of construction of the Carnelian Ave. fireeway bridge.
Date:
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
~ Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: Cityl State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: Cityl State Zip Date:
Name: (prh~ted) Street Address Signature:
Phone: Cityl State Zip Date:
Name: (primed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City. State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
/-
Petition for the Removal
Of Stop Signs on Sapphire Street
at Highland and Lemo~NIarble.
Petition:
We, the undersigned, hereby request that the 4-way stops at Sapphire and Highland Ave.
and at Sapphire and Lemon/Marble be returned to 2-way stop status as they were prior to
the start of construction of the Carnelian Ave. freeway bridge.
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: I d City, State Zip D
Name: (prlmted) Street Address ·
Phone: City, State Zip Date: ' '
Name: (printed) Street Address ~u~/~
Phone: :~ ~Z~ D~e:
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Petition for the Removal
Of Stop Signs on Sapphire Street
at Highland and Lemon/Marble.
Petition:
We, the undersigned, hereby request that the 4-way stops at Sapphire and Highland Ave.
and at Sapphire and Lemon/Marble be returned to 2-way stop status as they were prior to
the start of construction of the Carnelian Ave. freeway bridge.
Name: (printed) Street Address Sign~~
~7//4 5'~/rZ/ 5~o6 5APe/i/tic ~r~
Phone: c7dq-8~'Z~ a City, State Zip
Name: (printed) 'Street Address
Phone: cllr ,t_ g~' z q ( ~ City, State Zip
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) ' 'Street Address ' 'Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
TN'ame: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) ~ ' Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) ~ Street Address Signature:
?hone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) ~ Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Petition for the Removal
Of Stop Signs on Sapphire Street
at Highland and Lemon/Marble.
Petition:
We, the undersigned, hereby request that the 4-way stops at Sapphire and Highland Ave.
and at Sapphire and Lemon/Marble be returned to 2-way stop status as they were prior to
the start of construction of the Carnelian Ave. freeway bridge.
Name: (printed) ueet ess
N,m.A S ee, Ad ,e,,
Phone: / Ci~, State Zip Date: ?'.
'?o~)9~-/~ ~/?~ /~, :/q ,,- /~ ~/
Name: (proted) Sffeet Address Signature:
Phone: CiW, State Zip ~ate:
~/- ~gT-/~S~~ AL7A ~ ed~
I Name: ~mted) f S~eet Ad&ess Signa~re:
Phone: Ci~, State Zip ' ' ' Date:
Name: (p~ted) S~eet Ad~ess Si~amre:
Ph6he: ' Ci~, State Zip Date: [ ' ,
Name: (proted) S~eet Ad&ess Silage:
Phone: Ci~, State Zip Date:
Petition for the Removal
Of Stop Signs on Sapphire Street
at Highland and Lemon/Marble.
Petition:
We, the undersigned, hereby request that the 4-way stops at Sapphire and Highland Ave.
and at Sapphire and Lemon/Marble be returned to 2-way stop status as they were prior to
the start of construction of the Carnelian Ave. fireeway bridge.
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip )ate:
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) ' Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) ess Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Petition for the Removal
Of Stop Signs on Sapphire Street
at Highland and Lemon/Marble.
Petition:
We, the undersigned, hereby request that the 4-way stops at Sapphire and Highland Ave.
and at Sapphire and Lemon/Marble be returned to 2-way stop stares as they were prior to
the start of construction of the Carnelian Ave. freeway bridge.
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phon~: ~ [ ~ City, State Zip [ 'Date:
qqq- 3
Name: Collated) Street Address ; Signature:
Ph6f[& '1 ' ! City, State Zip ~ Date:~
Name: (printed) SUeet Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
! Name: (prb~ted) Street Acldress Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (pd~ted) Slzeet Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (,ufi~[erl) Street Address Signabate:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Petition for the Removal
Of Stop Signs on Sapphire Street
at Highland and Lemon/Marble.
Petition:
We, the undersigned, hereby request that the 4-way stops at Sapphire and Highland Ave.
and at Sapphire and Lemon/Marble be returned to 2-way stop status as they were prior to
the start of construction of the Carnelian Ave. fxeeway bridge.
Name: (printed) ' Street Address ' r' )
(~ t Date:
Phone: City, State Zip
q ~ -c)'~c, -,Sd c-/q' Ab-r~ t~,m/-,, q i]c, { I - I q -
Name: (printed) Street Address .
City, State Zip / / "'Date:
~h°neg ~ ~ ' '
Name: (printed) "~'~ili'Address
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name' rin e Street Addr""~ss Sig a e'
~hone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) ~ Street Address ' ~
Date:
City, State Zip
Name: (printe~~T~ Street Address ' ~
City, Stamp
Name: (printed) Street Address Signatuxe:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
9g~-
,/
Petition for the Removal
Of Stop SigRS on Sapphire Street
. at Highland and Lemen/Marble.
Petition:
We, the undersigned, hereby request that the 4-way stops at Sapphire and Highland Ave.
and at Sapphire and Lemon/Marble be returned to 2-way stop status as they were prior to
the start of construction of the Carnelian Ave. fleeway bridge.
Phone: City, State Zip Dat~:
Ph City, State Zip ~, ~ te: '~ '~ '~
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
]Name: (printed) Stweet Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) S~reet Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Petition for the Removal
Of Stop Signs on Sapphire Street
at Highland and Lemon/Marble.
Petition:
We, the undersigned, hereby request that the 4-way stops at Sapphire and Highland Ave.
and at Sapphire and Lemon/Marble be returned to 2-way stop status as they were prior to
the start of construction of the Carnelian Ave. freeway bridge.
Name: (printed) Street Address ,~ ' nare'
phone: CitY, State Zip a e.
· · Street Address
Phone: CitY, State Zip
printed ~'~Zt e-~7~e Street Address
' ~'t'?h°ne: t.~ ~ CitY, State Zip DateV
Phone: CitY, State Zip Dat~:
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: CitY, State Zip ' Date:
e 'ss .
Pl~one: ' CitY, State Zip Date: '
5~gZ~q570 ,4~r~4 X~n~4g ~k. q/7~ / / -c~-ol
Name: (printed) Street Address Sig~9/
/ /
Petition for the Removal
Of Stop Signs on Sapphire Street
at Highland and Lemon/Marble.
Petition:
we, the undersigned, hereby request that the 4-way stops at Sapphire and Highland Ave.
and at Sapphire and Lemon/Marble be returned to 2-way stop stares as they were prior to
the start of construction of the Camelian Ave. freeway bridge.
Name: (printed) S~eet Address Signature:
_:t~ ,,a E~ C,qCitC~,< d,,~/~' L~/./c,9 5]. ~Oz~,c,r.,
Phone: Ci~, State Zip ~ Date:
7dq- 7f~- 6fq7 n~ ~om~ c~ ~/7o/ ~-3-ol
· ' ~ S~e~ Ad~e
Phone: Ci~, State Zip / Date J d"
)e S~eet Ad~ess i a e: '
Phone: I1~ tare lp Date:
Nm~ ~mted) S~eet Ad~ess Silage: "
Phone: Ci~, State Zip Date:
Name: ~ted) S~eet Ad~ess Silage: :
Phone: Ci~, State Zip Date: :
Phone: Ci~, State Zip Date:
Nine: ~mted) S~eet Ad&ess Si~amre: i
Phone: Ci~, State Zip Date:
Petition for the Removal
Of Stop Signs on Sapphire Street
at Highland and Lemon/Marble.
Petition:
We, the undersigned, hereby request that the 4-way stops at Sapphire and Highland Ave.
and at Sapphire and Lemon/Marble be returned to 2-way stop status as they were prior to
the start of const~ction of the Carnelian Ave. freeway bridge.
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date: C)'
Name: (printed).
Na e: (printed) Street Address ,' '
' ' City, State Zip )ate: ~'
~V,,~> ~4A -;~vo fi4~, 10m& OrAd~iVO]' ~-Lc,
-Pl~Gne: City, State Zip ]Elate!
Name: (printed) Street Address
'ZoO '~ ~c~ C~oc/L-. '-"J
Phone: City, State Zip
~c~ ~u~f s~qo A¢~-z,, G,,~ ,dr_ ~t?o~
Phone: City, State Zip
~t~q¢o-1873 AFI'i[-~ ,eb 01'737 I
Name: (printed) Street Address d'~ -Si nare'
City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) Street Address
Phone: Ci~, State Zip Date:
Petition for the Removal
Of Stop Signs on Sal~phire Street
at Highland and Lemon/Marble.
Petition:
We, the undersigned, hereby request that the 4-way stops at Sapphire and Highland Ave.
and at Sapphire and Lemon/Marble be returned to 2-way stop status as they were prior to
the start of construction of the Carnelian Ave. freeway bridge.
' Name: (printed) Street Ad&ess
h~one/~ ~ Ci~p ~~ ~ 'l)ate:
~'Og', q&6- 7~j'g ~, ~fJ 5~737 /
Name: (printed) Street Address
Phone: City, State Zip
phone: -
i tare i Date:
Name: ~ted) S~eet Ad&ess Signa~e:
Phone: Ci~, State Zip Date:
Nine: ~ted) S~eet Ad&ess Silage:
Phone: Ci~, State Zip Date:
V
Petition for the Removal
Of Stop Signs on Sapphire Street
at Highland and Lemon/Marble.
Petition:
We, the undersigned, hereby request that the 4-way stops at Sapphire and Highland .Ave.
and at Sapphire and Lemon/Marble be retumed to 2-way stop status as they were pnor to
the start of construction of the Carnelian Ave. fleeway bridge.
Name: (printed) Street Address ' e:
J CitY, State Zip ~7:~/2/
~S O~o+~ oq (9z¢~ A~,, (9/9 ?/~o /
e: ' . Street Address 5'/~' lure' '
el&one:
$% City, State Zip ~)ate:
:)~o ~- I/j/~,-/oz,~,, Q 71>1 /-zy-o f
-FTc f
S~eet Ad~ess
Name: ~tcd) ~ S~eet Ad&ess Signa~e:
Phone: Ci~, Smt~ Zip Date:
, Nm~: ~tcd) S~e~t Ad&gss Silage:
Phone: ' ~i~, Smte~ip Dat~:
v
Petition for the Removal
Of Stop Signs on Sapphire Street
at Highland and Lemen/Marble.
Petition:
We, the undersigned, hereby request that the 4-way stops at Sapphire and Highland Ave.
and at Sapphire and Lemon/Marble be returned to 2-way stop status as they were prior to
the start of construction of the Carnelian Ave. fleeway bridge.
Name:(printea) Street Address C~:~nature: ~ ',_,--/
· ,,
G Ic~O ~rJDl(~ 0
Phone: ' i , a e i a e: /__ '
-
ame' rinte Street Address ' '."
Phone: " ' City, State Zip
Dat~:
qbq 9'A;L eY/d i~, L q / ¢d /
Name: (pdmed) Street Address ·
Phone:
Name: (printed) Street Address ~/g,p~ature:
~ Phone: City, State Zip Date:
? Y;"- 3//1> /JL-T~ cO/1/l~ (7A9/~Ol ,2-- '3-zoO/
NameTLnrinted) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) Street Address Signatttre:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Petition for the Removal
Of Stop Signs on Sapphire Street
at Highland and LemonfMarble.
Petition:
We, the undersigned, hereby request that the 4-way stops at Sapphire and Highland Ave.
and at Sapphire and Lemon/Marble be returned to 2-way stop status as they were prior to
the start of construction of the Carnelian Ave. f~eeway bridge.
Name: (printed) Street Address i e: '
Phone: City, State Zip Date: / / ,/
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip )ate:
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) Street Address Signatttre:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Petition fo~' the Removal
Of Stop Signs on Sapphire Street
at Highland anci Lemc~n/Marble.
Petition:
We, the undersigned, hereby request that the 4-way stops at Sapphire and Highland Ave.
and at Sapphh'e and Lemon/Marble be returned to 2-way stop status as they were prior to
the start of construction of the Carnelian Ave. fxeeway bridge.
Phone: i a i Date:
N/~ed) Street Address
¢,J ity, tare Zip ' D
C S
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Petition for the Removal
Of Stop Signs on Sapphire Street
at Highland and Lemon/Marble.
Petition:
We, the undersigned, hereby request that the 4-way stops at Sapphire and Highland Ave.
and at Sapphire and Lemon/Marble be returned to 2-way stop status as they were prior to
the start of construction of the Carnelian Ave. fxeeway bridge.
Name: (printed) S~xeet Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
qOq q'.l t-qS'05"" Rt.-;~ L~,,,.t,~ tea- qt'~t>/
signature:
: Name: (p~ted) Street Ade~es~ 5 +. ~-2,..~ /~L' / 14
Phone: -) I City, State Zip Date:
'
Name: (painted) SU~eq;;ess i a e:
~me: ~'ri~.ted) Street Address
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Phone: " City, State Zip
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) Street Address '~/~x~.~,~
Phone: City, State Zip
Name: (printed) ' S~eet Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Petition for the Removal
Of Stop Signs on Sapphire Street
at Highland and Lemon/Marble.
Petition:
We, the undersigned, hereby request that the 4-way stops at Sapphire and Highland Ave.
and at Sapphire and Lemon/Marble be rotre-ned to 2-way stop status as they were prior to
the start of construction of the Carnelian Ave. fleeway bridge.
Name: (prhat~d) Street Address ' a e'
P City, State Zip Date:
Phone: City, State Zip ,' e: U
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
. flL)Szi ~ T L/A,ccT
Phone: City, State Zip
NameZ (prLnte~) Street Address " Signature: / /
q ~ .9' f ~ ]'Fz~ I ~?}~izZ~,,~, c-d '~ r ? V Y>:l /~ i
Name: (printed)" Signature:
' City, State Zip
Name: (printoil) Street Address / '
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
C?o?) 9??
Name: ~ted) S~eet Ad~ess S~e:
Phone: ' Ci~, State Zip
~one:
//
Petition for the Removal
Of Stop Signs on Sapphire Street
at Highland and Lemon/Marble.
Petition:
We, the undersigned, hereby request that the 4-way stops at Sapphire and Highland Ave.
and at Sappb_ire and Lemon/Marble be returned to 2-way stop status as they were prior to
the start of construction of the Carnelian Ave. freeway bridge.
Name: (printed) Sixeel Address Signature:
t...)arlenc~ G/c~sso}~ cloo') At,caLorv.,~, bt C~d~ ~
City, State Zip Date:
City, State Zip
Phone:
Phone:
Phone: ' a e ip 0
Name: (printed) ~ ~dress ' re.re:
~ Date:
City, State Zip
Petition for the Removal
Of Stop Signs on Sapphire Street
at Highland and Lemon/Marble.
Petition: Whereas:
1) the need for control devices at the above intersections has been removed by the
opening of Carnelian Avenue north of 19th Street,
2) the normal flow of traffic allows safe and fi'equent openings for access from cross
streets at Sapphire,
3) Sapphire is an arterial street with no westerly alternate route,
4) the great majority of traffic flows on Sapphire Street,
5) the signs result in 16,000 unnecessary, air polluting, energy wasting stops and starts
per day,
6) relatively few homes are located west of Sapphire and there is no through route west
of Sapphire,
7) the smooth and expedient flow of traffic on Sapphire Street is impeded by the
nuisance placement of these signs;
we, the undersigned, hereby request that the 4-way stops at Sapphire and Highland Ave.
and at Sapphire and Lemon/Marble be returned to 2-way stop status as they were prior to
the start ofconstrnction of the Carnelian Ave. freeway bridge. ,
[ Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip l:iyate: /
%, p - f,e? -
Phone: J city, state zip
Name: (printed)
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Petition for the Removal
Of Stop Signs on Sapphire Street
at Highland and Lemon/Marble.
P etiti o n:
We, the undersigned, hereby request that the 4-way stops at Sapphire and Highland Ave.
and at Sapphire and Lemon/Marble be returned to 2-way stop status as they were prior to
the start of construction of the Carnelian Ave. fireeway bridge.
phone: CitY, State Zip
Name: (printed) Street Addre"'~s Signature:
Phone: CitY, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) ~ '~treet Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Tqame: (printed) ~ Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
?hone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) ~ Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Petition for the Removal
Of Stop Signs on Sapphire Street
at Highland and Lemon/Marble.·
Petition:
We, the tmdersig~ed, hereby request that the 4-way stops at Sapphire and Highland Ave.
and at Sapphire and Lemon/Marble be returned to 2-way stop slams as they were prior to
the start of construction of the Carnelian Ave. Seeway bridge.
I-
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip D'ate:
Phone: t
Name: (printed) Street Address
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
q~-e~ 7qq6 A;-A z~rn~ ~/,7ol /-31-oL
P~nee;~ City, State Zip ]J'ate:
Name: (printed) Stxeet Address ' at,are:
Phone: City, State Zip / / DaTeT '
Name: (printed) Street Address ~D' ' e:
ame: tin e Street Address i
,%e i t L"~'J&/ Date:
Phone: / t
qo~ c/go 7o/,x- q17o/ I' S/-6 /
Name: (printed) Street Address d" .
Phone: City, State Zip ~/ / .
Petition for the Removal
Of Stop Signs on Sapphire Street
at Highland and Lemon/Marble.
Petition:
We, the undersigned, hereby request that the 4-way stops at Sapphire and Highland Ave.
and at Sapphire and Lemon/Marble be returned to 2-way stop status as they were prior to
the start of construction of the Carnelian Ave. fireeway bridge.
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
phone.r City, State Zip Date:
{qot{h qFrq- 2_~tb~,' A\'~ U~v,r,a C h ~rTO X ~ 12:1 i C~l
Name: ~drinted) Street Address Signate're:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (primted) Street AddreSs Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Petition for the l{emoval
Of Stop Signs on Sapphire Street
at Highland and Lemon/Marble. .
Petition:
We, the undersigned, hereby request that the 4-way stops at Sapphire and Highland Ave.
and at Sapphire and Lemon/Marble be returned to 2-way stop status as they were prior to
the start of construction of the Carnelian Ave. fi'eeway bridge.
Name: (printed) Street Address ~ ~
Phone: //C/~_Z~e >_~. ' Dat:
Name: (printed) Stzeet Address lSi :
Phone: ' ' Date:
' Name: (printed) Slzeet Address ' a e'
Phone: : Cit~, State Zip Date:
'Phone: i ~te i ' ~ate: '
~-~' ~:7~a, ~ ~/7ol /-;7- o I
Petition for the Removal
Of Stop Signs on Sapphire Street
at Highland and Lemon/Marble.
Petition:
We, the undersig~ed, hereby request that the 4-way stops at Sapphire and Highland Ave.
and at Sapphire and Lemon/Marble be returned to 2-way stop stares as they were prior to
the start of construction of the Carnelian Ave. freeway bridge·
Name: (printed) Street Address
City, State ip ' ~ ' te:
Phone:
· . , 7"G'd2 'city, state Zi
Name: (printed) Street Address
Name: (printed) Street Address Si~ature".'
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
~--- '~ignature:
Name: (printed) Street Address
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
~lame: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
~ '~ignature:
Name: (printed) Street Address
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
' '~ignature:
Name: (printed) Street Address
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Petition for the Removal
Of Stop Signs on Sappl~ire Street
at Highland and Lemon/Marble.
Petition:
We, the undersigned, hereby request that the 4-way stops at Sapphire and Highland Ave.
and at Sapphire and Lemon/Marble be returned to 2-way stop status as they were prior to
the start of construction of the Carnelian Ave. fleeway bridge.
Name: (printed) Sueet Address i a e:
Phnne: City, State Zip
Phone:
Name: (printed) Sueet Address Si ture:
Phone: City, State Zip
Name: ~ted) S~eet Ad~ess Signa~e:
Phone: Ci~, State Zip Date:
Name: ~ted) S~eet Ad~ess Silage:
Phone: Ci~, State Zip Date:
Nine: ~ted) S~eet Ad~ess Silage:
Phone: Ci~, State Zip Date:
Name: ~ted) ~ S~cet Ad~ess Silage:
Phone: Ci~, State Zip Date:
Petition for the Removal
Of Stop Signs on Sapphire Street,
at Highland and LemonfMarble.
Petition:
We, the undersigned, hereby request that the 4-way stops at Sapphire and Highland Ave.
and at Sapphire and Lemonf Marble be returned to 2-way stop status as they were prior to
the start of construction of the Carnelian Ave. freeway bridge.
Name: (printed) Street Address i a e:
Pho.e: , Ci~, State zi~ '/ /
City, State Zip
1~ame: (printed) Street Address * a re'
one: City, State Zip Date:
q~) p8-7- 9~'oq xh'. c4, q /?ol o/-~-01
2~ ~"f:/3/.~.., /
p~one: ---' City, 'State Zi~
Name: (printed) treetess S ~/, -,_,
· ' Z'
Phon~:
Phon~: Ci~, State Zip D~t~:
~hone: CiW, State Zip re: "'
Name: ~mted) S~eet Ad~ess Si~amre:
Phone: Ci~, State Zip Date:
Petition for the Removal
Of Stop Signs on Sapphire Street
at Highland and Lemon/Marble.
Petition:
We, the undersigned, hereby request that the 4-way stops at Sapphire and Highland Ave.
and at Sapphire and Lemon/Marble be returned to 2~way stop status as they were prior to
the start of construction of the Carnelian Ave. freeway bridge.
Phone: ~' City, State Zip" DT,,~
~ame: (printed) Slxeet Ad&ess ., I ,
Phohe: ' City, State Zip DaT~:
Pt/6nei t City, State Zip '
Phone: ~ Ci~, State Zip batey
N~e: ~ated) S~eet Ad~ess ~i~ ~.~
Phone: ~ Ci~, State Zip
~6-'7E 7b ~z/~ M,~ em f/Ttt
Petition for the Removal
Of Stop Signs on Sapphire Street
at Highland and Lemon/Marble.
Petition:
We, the undersigned, hereby request that the 4-way stops at Sapphire and Highland Ave.
and at Sapphire and Lemon/Marble be returned to 2-way stop stares as they were prior to
the start of construction of the Carnelian Ave. fleeway bridge.
Name: (printed) ee ess i nare:
' 'Dat~.
Name: (printed) Street Address I Signature:
Phone: ' , i Date:
Phone: ' City, State Zip Da'k:'
q,g.?-~&8,/ /qc-/,q D.,m (,.~
?hone: City, StateZip ~'~ Date:
blz,/bz .
City, State Zip Date:
Name~ (p~te~ Stree~ ~dre~
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Cf'oq) q,SX-t'qfl A,'-,~ Z4;~r..~ ~,.~¢,"7o,'
" ' a ":
'Date: C '
Petition for the Removal
Of Stop Signs on Sapphire Street
at Highland and Lemon/Marble.
Petition:
We, the undersigned, hereby request that the 4-way stops at Sapphire and Highland Ave.
and at Sapphire and Lemon/Marble be returned to 2-way stop status as they were prior to
the start of construction of the Camelinn Ave. fleeway bridge.
Name: (printed) Street Address '~tur~
fZo6Ctt-F j. ~rn~6.~A ~o~q jC~vr
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) S~eet Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
' Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
.. /
Petition for the Removal
Of Stop Signs on Sapphire Street
at Highland and Lemon/Marble.
P etiti o n:
We, the undersigned, hereby request that the 4-way stops at Sapphire and Highland Ave.
and at Sapphire and Lemon/Marble be returned to 2-way stop status as they were prior to
the start of construction of the Carnelian Ave. freeway bridge.
Name: (printed) ;treet Address ' ature'
D~te:
Phone:
Name: (prOted) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
-- Sig
Name: (printed) Street Address nature:
Phone: [City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Petition fo~; the l{emoval
Of Stop Signs en Sapplfire Street
at Highland and Lemon/Marble.
Petition:
We, the undersigned, hereby request that the 4-way stops at Sapphire and Highland Ave.
and at Sapphire and Lemon/Marble be returned to 2-way stop status as they were prior to
the start of construction of the Carnelian Ave. fi-eeway bridge.
Name: (printed) Si nature:
"'0'": %",::"
Phone: ~ J Sign :
CiiT, State Zip Date:
Phone: City, State Zip
a%Z,~% s~ee, ,~e,, , " '
Phone: City, State Zip i:Yate:
Name: (pated) S~eet Address Signat~ e:
Phone: City, State Zip
Phone/ d City, State Zip // , ' 6ate:/'
y-
Petition for the Removal
Of Stop Signs on Sapphire Street
at Highland and LemonfMarble.
Petition:
We, the undersigned, hereby request that the 4-way stops at Sapphire and Highland Ave.
and at Sapphire and Lemon/Marble be returned to 2-way stop status as they were prior to
the start of construction of the Carnelian Ave. freeway bridge.
Name: (printed) ~Stxeet Address
/,'l/~,,-t,,ee--u ,,~ ;-~/ Z~ .uggm ~o
Name: (printed) Street Address ' '
Phone: City, State Zip Dati'
Name: (printed) Street Address tb/~/-~/~- S~~/~
Phone~ City~ State Zip Date~
Phone: City, State Zip ' ' / :!
Namei (pfiated)
UiW, State Zip
Petition for the Removal
Of Stop Signs on Sapphire Street
at Highland and Lemon/Marble.
Petition:
We, the undersigned, hereby request that the 4-way stops at Sapphire and Highland Ave.
and at Sapphire and Lemon/Marble be returned to 2-way stop stares as they were prior to
the start of construction of the Carnelian Ave. fleeway bridge.
e: fin e Street Address igna e'
Stre t Address - /
Name; (printed) Sdeet Address "
Phone: City, State Zip
ate~
ame: rint(~:d ~ Street Address
Phone:
Name: (printed) Street Address d Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip ! Date:
i/'
Petition for the Removal
Of Stop Signs on Sapphire Street
at Highland and Lemon/Marble.
Petition:
We, the undersig~ed, hereby request that the 4-way stops at Sapphire and Highland Ave.
and at Sapphire and Lemon/Marble be returned to 2-way stop stares as they were prior to
the start of construction of the Carnelian Ave. freeway bridge.
Name: ri~ted ' Street Address
phone:(~ .?,"l ~ [ ,,'U Cily, State ,Zip
City, State Zip
Name: (prknted) ~ i Address '~
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) ~" 'Street Address ' '~'tgnature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (prixtted) ~ ~ess Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) ' ieet Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Petition for the Removal
Of Stop Signs oR Sapphire Street
at Highland and Lemon/Marble.
Petition:
We, the undersigned, hereby request that the 4-way stops at Sapphire and Highland Ave.
and at Sapphire and Lemon/Marble be returned to 2-way stop status as they were prior to
the start of construction of the Carnelian Ave. freeway bridge.
Name: (printed) ·
Phone: i , ~ . ~(t~ ~7P(/ Date) _
Phone: C~F,;X.~ Zip DkY~ '
q~ qgq-z/+'Tq L , dA, q/7~:Date:'
rm i Street Address i atare~
Name: (printed) Street Address ( ~ e"
·
Phone: City, State Zip
Name: (printed) Slzeet Address Sign~
Phone: 7 C'~?~p
. -,,~
: ' Street Address · ,
P~,~: '1~ ' ' ' ' ' '~ City, State Zip Date: ~ r,J ,
Name: (printed) Stzeet Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) Stzeet Address Signature:
Phone~ City~ Stat~ 7ip Date~
Petition for the Removal
Of Stop Signs on Sapphire Street
at Highland and Lemon/Marble.
Petition:
We, the undersigned, hereby request that the 4-way stops at Sapphire and Highland Ave.
and at Sapphire and Lemon/Marble be returned to 2-way stop status as they were prior to
the start of construction of the Carnelian Ave. fTeeway bridge.
Name: (printed) Street Address ~ig~e~~
Na~e: (primted) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) ~ Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
'7Name: (printed) ~ 'Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Petition for the Removal
Of Stop Signs on Sapphire Street
at Highland and Lemon/Marble.
Petition:
We, the undersigned, hereby request that the 4-way stops at Sapphire and Highland Ave.
and at Sapphire and Lemon/Marble be returned to 2-way stop stares as they were prior to
the start of construction of the Carnelian Ave. fleeway bridge.
Phone: \ ~ 7oh
Pfi'one: / City, State Zip ' 'Di't~/~)
Name: (printed) Street Address ' Signatur'e:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip ~ Date:
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Petition for the Removal
Of Stop Signs on Sapphire Street
at Highland and Lemon/Marble.
Petition:
We, the undersigned, hereby request that the 4-way stops at Sapphire and High]and Ave.
and at Sappl'dre and Lemon/Marble be returned to 2-way stop status as they were prior to
the start of construction of the Carnelian Ave. fleeway bridge.
Name: (printed) ' Street Address Signature:
· i e i /
City, Stare Zip 1/~' 'ffatc-'~, '
Street Address
Nanlc: (printed)
b6-,~'~ V/e,~,,~,~ /off; F,-~o~ <_,'~
City, State ip ]ate:
Name: (prhttcd)
Phone: City, State Zip Da e'
Name: (printed) Street Address
,'~"~Of~e ~exJ~r- Fe, r,coI':15'~ Jb.Z,C~ ,,~e-
phonefj City, State Zip 0 Date:
Name: (printed) Street Address
Phone: City, State Zip I~aie:
~amJ: ~ated) S=eet Ad~ess ~~ i a e: '
.
Phone: "CiW, Sm Zip
Petition fer the Removal
Of Stop Signs on Sapphire Street
at Highland :~nd Lemon/Marble.
Petition:
We, the undersigned, hereby request that the 4-way stops at Sapphire and Highland Ave.
and at Sapphire and Lemon/Marble be returned to 2-way stop status as they were prior to
the start of construction of the Carnelian Ave. fi'eeway bridge.
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
N .e:(p ted) S eetAddre
Phone: City, State Zip D~{te: .~,
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
e~-'~s'~-~oSz ~,~-~,,, c~,,,~,,e,,~. ~,~o, //,,/o~
Phone: ' ' City, State Zip . "' '
Name: (printed) Street Address
Ph6ne: '~ Zip
Zd,,,;z ~ ,9./7~/ /-/z -~/
Ph6~:' City, State Zip Date:
Name: ~ted) S~eet Ad&ess Signa~e:
Phone: Ci~, State Zip Date:
Name: ~ated) S~eet Ad~ess Signa~e:
Phone: Ci~, S~te Zip Date:
Petition for the Removal
Of Stop Signs on Sapphire Street
at Highland and Lemon/Marble.
Petition:
We, the undersigned, hereby request that the 4-way stops at Sapphire and Highland Ave.
and at Sapphire and Lemon/Marble be returned to 2-way stop status as they were prior to
the start of construction of the Carnelian Ave. freeway bridge.
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
· .-i .... ,j-
Name: (printed) . Street Addres~s~..~ '
~' ' t 6l ', ' '~> ~ ~!'
~hone: C~ty, State Zip :, ~ "': ~ Date:
~.~ , :, ~.. ,... - :, :~,,..~ > - .... --
S~eet Address . Si ~re:
ame~ tin e
N~e: ~ted) S~eet Ad~ess Silage:
Phone: CiW, State Zip Date:
Name: (proted) S~eet Ad&ess Signa~e:
Phone: CiW, State Zip Date:
Nine: ~mted) S~eet Ad~ess Silage:
Phone: Ci~, State Zip Date:
Petition fer the Removal
Of Stop Signs on Sapphire Street
at Highland and Lemon/Marble.
Petition:
We, the undersigned, hereby request that the 4-way stops at Sapphire and Highland Ave.
and at Sapphire and Lemon/Marble be returned to 2-way stop status as they were prior to
the start of construction of the Carnelian Ave. freeway bridge.
Name: (printed)Street AddressS,~
,- e:
Name:(p..ted> Stree, A dress
Phone: City, State Zi~! Date:
~,qoq~) q~c~-~tq~U~'e~ ~fi c__fi qq0I'/n/,ol
a e: tin e Street Address i~, re:
Name: (printed) Street Address
Phone: ! City, State Zip Date:
Name: (prLnted) Street Address Signature:
Paone: ,) City, State Zip ~ate:
~ra e: (~rinted) Stxeet Address ·
Phone: i~ity, State Zip
~hone: 4"
Petition for the Removal
Of Stop Signs on Sapphire Street
at Highland and Lemon/Marble.
Petition: Whereas:
1) the need for control devices at the above intersections has been removed by the
opening of Carnelian Avenue north of 19th Street,
2) the normal flow of traffic allows safe and frequent openings for access from cross
streets at Sapphire,
3) Sapphire is an arterial street with no westerly alternate route,
4) the great majority of traffic flows on Sapphire Street,
5) the signs result in 16,000 unnecessary, air polluting, energy wasting stops and starts
per day,
6) relatively few homes are located west of Sapphire and there is no through route west
of Sapphire,
7) the smooth and expedient flow of traffic on Sapphire Street is impeded by the
nuisance placement of these signs;
we, the undersigned, hereby request that the 4-way stops at Sapphire and Highland Ave.
and at Sapphire and Lemon/Marble be returned to 2-way stop status as they were prior to
the start oI construction ox tn~ ,~amdian Ave. freewa; bridge.
------ Signature:
Name: (.printed) Street Address
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Phone: ' City, State Zip a~
~'d;?- Y, kd.2.,~ 3/ //z.~,'~ E~,~,~ ~,,~
Phone: City, State Zip Dat~:
Name: (prited) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Petition for the Removal
Of Stop Signs en Sapphire Street
at Highland and Lemon/Marble.
Petition:
We, the undersigned, hereby request that the 4-way stops at Sapphire and Highland Ave.
and at Sapphire and Lemon/Marble be returned to 2-way stop status as they were prior to
the start of construction of the Carnelian Ave. freeway bridge.
Name: (printed) Street Address
Name: (printed) Street Address -
7"77~ ~,~ ¢',,~,<FF'Z,~_ ,9'3 (/
PhSn~ City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) Street Addres~
~R/L/LYC 5'~,,~ 57{0 FoK
. .
Phone: C~¢~p ~'~ C,~4 a'
Phone: City, State Z~p
Name: (printed) Street Address S'
Phone: i a e i Date:
Name: (printed) Street Address Si,~/~ture:
Phone: City, State Zip
.
i'~'ame: (printed) Street Address ' '
Phone: i , a e ' : "~
Petition for the Removal
Of Stop Signs on Sapphire Street
at Highland and Lemon/Marble.
Petition: Whereas:
1) the need for control devices at the above intersections has been removed by the
opening of Carnelian Avenue north of 19th Street,
2) the normal flow of traffic allows safe and frequent openings for access from cross
streets at Sapphire,
3) Sapphire is an arterial street with no westerly aRemate route,
4) the great majority of traffic flows on Sapphire Street,
5) the signs result in 16,000 urmecessary, air polluting, energy wasting stops and starts
per day,
6) relatively few homes are located west of Sapphire and there is no through route west
of Sapphire,
7) the smooth and expedient flow of traffic on Sapphire Street is impeded by the
nuisance placement o f these signs;
we, the undersigned, hereby request that the 4-way stops at Sapphire and Highland Ave.
and at Sapphire and Lemon/Marble be retumed to 2-way stop status as they were prior to
he start of construction of the Carnelian Ave. freeway bridge.
Name: (printed) Street Address S' a '
~/~,/~/~ Date:
Ph°~y0~_qB.7.,b~ t~,~r~.~(5~, 91:i , ae i?Or /-/t-~D
· .i, aei
Phone.. ~7"'
Street Address
Zi ,
NLrne: (printed) Street Address ~ S'~at~e:
Phone:
Name: (prb~ted) e"ddress
~hone: Cit~, State Zip
Petition for the Removal
Of Stop Signs en Sapphire Street
at Highland and Lemon/Marble.
Petition:
We, the undersigned, hereby request that the 4-way stops at Sapphire and Highland Ave.
and at Sapphire and Lemon/Marble be returned to 2-way stop status as they were prior to
the start of construction of the Carnelian Ave. freeway bridge.
Phone: ~ City, State Zip ' ' Date:
Ph°ne(~,,l~ ,Z/'~ City, ~'hte Zip Date:
Name: (printed) Street Address ~
Name: (printed) Street Address ·
Phone: i , a e i Date:
12o7 fq5'37,/I ~?~tCL.c ~ ¢/7e'~1 r"7~ 50
Phone: City, State Zip Date: .~,,Y
/
Name: (printed) Street Address
Signature~
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
t:(Oc'l q.~t ~1 ~ ,~L'..zJ. kC~,/~j elI ~ ol
Name: (printed) Street Address Si~natu~,_>
Phone: ' City, State Zip
Petition for the Removal
Of Stop Signs on Sapphire Street
at Highland and Lemon/Marble.
Petition: Whereas:
1) the need for control devices at the above intersections has been removed by the
opening of Carnelian Avenue north of 19th Street,
2) the normal flow of traffic allows safe and frequent openings for access from cross
streets at Sapphire,
3) Sapphire is an arterial street with no westerly altemate route,
4) the great majority of traffic flows on Sapphire Street,
5) the signs result in 16,000 unnecessary, air polluting, energy wasting stops and starts
per day,
6) relatively few homes are located west of Sapphire and there is no through route west
of Sapphire,
7) the smooth and expedient flow of traffic on Sapphire Street is impeded by the
nuisance placement of these signs;
we, the undersigned, hereby request that the 4-way stops at Sapphire and Highland .Ave.
and at Sapphire and Lemon/Marble be returned to 2-way stop status as they were prior to
the start ot construcnon oz me ~_,at~elian Ave. freeway bridge.
Name: (printed) "" Street Address ""I Signature:
Phone: City, S. ta~. C_ Date: I
C ~ ' '2'?~t' s I~ S'
Name: (printed S.t'reet A
Phone: City, State Zip ' Date:
Phone: City, S t Zip , . Date:
0
Petition for the Removal
Of Stop Signs on Sapphire Street
at Highland and LemonMarble.
Petition:
We, the undersigned, hereby request that the 4-way stops at Sapphire and Highland Ave.
and at Sapphire and Lemon/Marble be returned to 2-way stop status as they were prior to
the start of constraction of the Cameljan Ave. freeway bridge.
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
%e '9,/,-¢z35.S' A/l--, 1,,,,,,,,.,, CA ~
A YZ Si nature'/'
PHdn& ' ·
City, State ZipI~it~:v~'-
~i'C;.,q-ct~FcT.zy~,.~~/s~.Th Lr.~mr ,E~' ~/7~/'h.zS'-gc/
PhonG: ' "' ' City, State Zip ' ' Date:
N,az~e: (printed) _ , Street Address Sig,n~ature:
2'
Phone: City, State Zip ' ·-~ate: ~ ,-,/
~'¢ ~f-' -~'¢Z7 //,,'7-2~/r-',¢///~r'~:~'?~'//2--
Name: (printed) Street Address .i nar: _
l~one: City, State Zip ~ate:
cb7- e~-7- q F~ V ,qL>/,- ~.,.~ d:.t. /:7 -77-
Phone: City, State Zip Date: / [ /
Name:,~L~d) Street Address Signature~h&
Phone: City, State Zip Date ,
~'~"z [z,,~-~,,~, A~,,,, ~,,~,, q,7o/ /-,~-,-~,~,'in )
Phone:
/, / -
~/
Petition for the Removal
Of Stop Signs on Sapphire Street
at Highland and Lemon/Marble.
Petition: Whereas:
1) the need for control devices at the above intersections has been removed by the
opening of Carnelian Avenue north of 19th Street,
2) the normal flow of traffic allows safe and frequent openings for access from cross
streets at Sapphire,
3) Sapphire is an arterial street with no westerly alternate route,
4) the great majority of traffic flows on Sapphire Street,
5) the signs result in 16,000 unnecessary, air polluting, energy wasting stops and starts
per day,
6) relatively few homes are located west of Sapphire and there is no through route west
o f Sapphire,
7) the smooth and expedient flow of traffic on Sapphire Street is impeded by the
nuisance placement of these signs;
we, the undersigned, hereby request that the 4-way stops at Sapphire and Highland Ave.
and at Sapphire and Lemon/Marble be returned to 2-way stop status as they were prior to
tne start ox coil~tl u~,tton of the Ca..Jian Ave. freeway bridge.
~ame: ~p~ted>S~eet ~d~e~ Sig~a~e:
/D~m~ E ~cF~-/ ~ ~ ~ ~ x/, s r/~/~<~4/
Phone:~??l/~7 / C)~State Zip '~ Date: ,
b~/~//~r/~/ ,C'~ q/7~{
Name: (prWted) Street Addresg' i i nare:
Phone: City, State Zip ,~ d)ate:
Phone: " City, State Zip Date:
Name: ' ted) Street Address Si na e'
Petition for the Removal
Of Stop Signs on Sapphire Street
at Highland and Letnon/Marble.
Petition:
We, the undersigned, hereby request that the 4-way stops at Sapphire and Highland Ave.
and at Sapphire and Lemon/Marble be returned to 2-way stop status as they were prior to
the start of construction of the Carnelian Ave. freeway bridge.
Phone: ~7 ity, tate ~ip
Name: (printed) L> Street Address
Phone: City, Sta~e Zip Date:
Nine: ~ted) S~eet Ad&ess '~~
Phone: Ci~, State Zip Date:
Name: (proted) S~eet Ad~ess ' -
Phone: Ci~, State Zip Date:
XcKJ Lo~X (~ ~/Tn/ / L- ~9 ~7
Nine: ~ted) S~eet Ad~ess ' :
Phone: Ci~, State Zip Dat~:
Petition for the Removal
Of Stop Signs on Sapphire Street
at Highland and Lemon/Marble.
Petition: Whereas:
1) the need for control devices at the above intersections has been removed by the
opening of Carnelian Avenue north of 19tn Street,
2) the normal flow of traffic allows safe and frequent openings for access from cross
streets at Sapphire,
3) Sapphire is an arterial street with no westerly alternate route,
4) the great majority of traffic flows on Sapphire Street,
5) the signs result in 16,000 unnecessary, air polluting, energy wasting stops and starts
per day,
6) relatively few homes are located west of Sapphire and there is no through route west
of Sapphire,
7) the smooth and expedient flow of traffic on Sapphire Street is impeded by the
nuisance placement of these signs;
we, the undersigned, hereby request that the 4-way stops at Sapphire and Highland .Ave.
and at Sapphire and Lemon/Marble be returned to 2-way stop status as they were prior to
the start ox construenon ot t[tu ~_,atttelian Ave. freeway bridge.
-- Street Address
ame: (printed)
Name: rinted) - . Street Address Date:~tur~,~"%
pho~ne:~p ~Y~ ~--'T i },X E~-- City, State Zip
Petition for the Removal
Of Stop Signs on Sapphire S~reet
at Highhnd and Lemon/Marble.
Petition:
We, the undersigned, hereby request that the 4-way stops at Sapphire and Highland Ave.
and at Sapphire and Lemon/Marble be returned to 2-way stop status as they were prior to
the start of construction of the Carnelian Ave. freeway bridge.
NaMe: (.pi iu[ed) Street Address / - ' :
Phone: ~f' '~ City, State Zip
Name: (printed) Street Address ' ' ·
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Name: (printed) Street Address ' atur% .
C6~n'e~ ) City' State Zip ·
Name: (printed) S~et Address
he: City, State Zip Date: ',3
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Phone:
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
ej city, state zip Date:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
Petition for the Removal
Of Stop Signs on Sapphire Street
at Highland and Lemon/Marble.
Petition: Whereas:
1) the need for control devices at the above intersections has been removed by the
opening of Carnelian Avenue north of 19th Street,
2) the normal flow of traffic allows safe and frequent openings for access from cross
streets at Sapphire,
3) Sapphire is an arterial street with no westerly alternate route,
4) the great majority of traffic flows on Sapphire Street,
5) the signs result in 16,000 unnecessary, air polluting, energy wasting stops and starts
per day,
6) relatively few homes are located west of Sapphire and there is no through route west
of Sapphire,
7) the smooth and expedient flow of traffic on Sapphire Street is impeded by the
nuisance placement of these signs;
we, the undersigned, hereby request that the 4-way stops at Sapphire and Highland Ave.
and at Sapphire and Lemon/Marble be returned to 2-way stop status as they were prior to
the start of construction of the Carnelian Ave. freeway bridge.
V
Petition for the Removal
Of Stop Signs on Sapphire Street
at Highland and Lenaon/Marble.
Petition:
We, the undersigned, hereby request that the 4-way stops at Sapphire and Highland Ave.
and at Sapphire and Lemon/Marble be returned to 2-way stop status as they were prior to
the start of construction of the Carnelian Ave. freeway bridge.
Name: (printed) Street Address
Phone: C "Date:
Toy 7ET-'7os'o /ckz771/_-Zc~4 y/7o/ /Z,,~f/"77
' Phone: Date:
Name: (printed) Street Address Si ture:
Name: (printed) Street Address '
'l~hone: City, State Zip
/Date:
Name: (printed) Street Address S~:~
Phone' City, State Zip
Phone: City, State Zip
Dateji~/~
Name: (printed) Street Address Si amre:
Phone: City, State Zip Da
Name: ~ted) S~eet Ad&ess ' ·
Phone:/ Ci~, State Zip ~t~
Petition for the Removal
Of Stop Signs on Sapphire Street
at Highland and Lemon/Marble.
Petition: Whereas:
1) the need for control devices at the above intersections has been removed by the
opening of Camelima Avenue north of 19th Street,
2) the normal flow of traffic allows safe and fzequent openings for access from cross
streets at Sapphire,
3) Sapphire is an arterial street with no westerly alternate route,
4) the great majority of traffic flows on Sapphire Street,
5) the signs result in 16,000 unnecessary, air polluting, energy wasting stops and starts
per day,
6) relatively few homes are located west of Sapphire and there is no titrough route west
of Sapphire,
7) the smooth and expedient flow of traffic on Sapphire Street is impeded by the
nuisance placement of these signs;
we, the undersigned, hereby request that the 4-way stops at Sapphire and Highland Ave.
and at Sapphire and Lemon/Marble be returned to 2-way stop status as they were prior to
the start of construction of the Carnelian Ave. freeway bridge.
?hone: City, State Zip ~ 7Dat '~
Date: ' '
Name: (printe,d) Street Address i re:
Phone: dity, Siate Zip .~ ' Da'[~
~qe~t Address~/
City, State Zip
Phone:
~qae~a
Name: (printed) Street Address
phone: City, State Zip Dat~l_Z
Petition for the Removal
Of Stop Signs on Sapphire Street
at Highland and Lemon/Marble.
Petition:
We, the undersigned, hereby request that the 4-way stops at Sapphire and Highland Ave.
and at Sapphire and Lemonf Marble be returned to 2-way stop status as they were prior to
the start of construction of the Carnelian Ave. freeway bridge.
! Name: (printed) Street Address Sigma
Phone: ?o9 / ' City, SthteZip a e:
street Addr, ' S,
Phone: u City, State Zip 'Date: /
Phone: Date:
'City, StatiZip
: · .
Phone:
Ci~, State Zip
J~ame: ~mted) S~eet Ad&ess
Name: ~mted) S~eet Ad&ess
Phone: / Ci~, State Zip .
Nine- ~ated) S~eet Ad~ess ' ' '
PHo~: ~ ' i Ci~, State Zip -
Dale:
Nine: ~ted) ee
Phone: Ci~, State Zip ' Date:
Petition for the Removal
Of Stop Signs on Sapphire Street
at Highland and Lemon/Marble.
Petition: Whereas:
1) the need for control devices at the above intersections has been removed by the
opening of Carnelian Avenue north of 19~ Street,
2) the normal flow of traffic allows safe and frequent openings for access from cross
streets at Sapphire,
3) Sapphire is an arterial street with no westerly alternate route,
4) the great majority oftraffie fiows on Sapphire Street,
5) the signs result in 16,000 unnecessary, air polluting, energy wasting stops and starts
per day,
6) relatively few homes are located west of Sapphire and there is no through route west
of Sapphire,
7) the smooth and expedient flow of traffic on Sapphire Street is impeded by the
nuisance placement of these signs;
we, the undersigned, hereby request that the 4oway stops at Sapphire and Highland Ave.
and at Sapphire and Lemon/Marble be retumed to 2-way stop status as they were prior to
the start of construction of the Carnelian Ave. freeway bridge.
Name: (printed) Slxeet Address Signature:
115 t'4, o c,~'>'; I-h ~( ¢t~t~.' ,~t~.. "
Phone: City, State Zip
~ ~"':/V 9i'z- 2_, ~.~ L~,.-,a ,, el,, /z_ - Z? -
"'s'%"'. ' 'Ei' ";"%
Phone: ~ State ip /Date: C
'7 65 ~'~ 3 /7 '~ ) F/",/-c,..,.,.~- [.l - 2_ 5' - -'
..,.....: ,..,...,,,,.....,,.,....
Phone: City, State Zip /7~Date:%2' .
~'lO~ fie, 7- i q q ? ,~( b,,. Lc, v, q a,_ '7.. ,~
Name: (printed) Shreet Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
0 VEA
Petition for the Removal
Of Stop Signs on Sapphire Street
at Highhnd and Lemon/Marble,
Petition:
We, the undersigned, hereby request that the 4-way stops at Sapphire and Highland Ave.
and at Sapphire and Lemon/Marble be returned to 2-way stop status as they were prior to
the start of construction of the Carnelian Ave. freeway bridge.
Name: (printed) Street Address i :
~TA ,,, o ~'~, ,,¥~_ ~,',-,'z /-/;/1~,~ 2,2 s~j~..._,.,~
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
(2o7) Z~ : z 37--- /~/F z~,,~-, cA 9/~1
: 'd>,6,pF/ ee es Signamre:.
Phone: City, State Zip D ~ ' A }
Name: ~ted) S~eet Ad~ess Signature:
Phone: Ci~, State Zip ~te: ~
Phone: / ' I Ci~, State Zip Date:
~7 - f~l- (y;,? All, lc--~ ("{ f[~ 7~ ' Zz-q'l,
Naffe: ~ated) S~eet Ad~ess Si~a~re:
Phone: Ci~, State Zip Date:
: ' S~eet Ad&ess ~ ' ' re'
~one: / i , e i ' Date:
~ tJ ~A
Petition for the Removal
Of Stop Signs on Sapphire Street
at Highland and Lemon/Marble.
Petition: Whereas:
I) the need for control devices at the above intersections has been removed by the
opening of Carnelian Avenue north of 19th Street,
2) the normal flow of traffic allows safe and frequent openings for access from cross
streets at Sapphire,
3) Sapphire is an arterial street with no westerly alternate route,
4) the great majority of traffic flows on Sapphire Street,
5) the signs result in 16,000 unnecessary, air polluting, energy wasting stops and starts
per day,
6) relatively few homes are located west of Sapphire and there is no through route west
of Sapphire,
7) the smooth and expedient flow oftraffic on Sapphire Street is impeded by th~
nuisance placement of these signs;
we, the undersigned, hereby request that the 4-way stops at Sapphire and Highland Ave.
and at Sapphire and Lemon/Marble be retumed to 2-way stop stares as they were prior to
the start of construction of the Carnelian Ave. freeway bridge. ~,-
~I)at~:
Phone: City, State Zip
-~TfV~ Dl,~.n,~' ~c~l~.,? ~'/-I,'r~..~,I L-.,
Phone: City, State Zip ' Date:
' !
Phone: I.~L,2; "? City; State Zip' .'- 7.,. ., Date:,, / .-.. ..
/
Petition fer the Remova~
Of Stop Signs on Sapphire Street
at Highland and Lemon/Marble.
Petition:
we, the undersigned, hereby request that the 4-way stops at Sapphire and Highland Ave.
and at Sapphire and Lemon/Marble be retumed to 2-way stop status as they were prior to
the start of construction of the Carnelian Ave. freeway bridge.
Name: (printed) Stxeet Adckess Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip C-CD3o Date:
Phone: ' i a e i Date: ,4.)~
Phone: CiW, State Zip Date:
Name: (proted) S~eet Ad&ess Si~amre:
I Phone: ~ CiW, State Zip
~ame: ~ted) S~eet Ad&ess Signa~re:
Phone: Ci~, State Zip Date:
i i, aei
e' ~te S~eet Ad~ess / / q' a~" g ' '
Ci~, State Zip D~e: ~ ~
Pho~&'
Name: (pited) S~eet Ad~ess
P~ne: Ci~, S~te Zip D - "
v/
Petition for the Removal
Of Stop Signs on Sapphire Street
at Highland and Lemon/Marble.
Petition:
we, the undersigned, hereby request that the 4-way stops at Sapphire and Highland Ave.
and at Sapphire and Lemon/Marble be returned to 2-way stop status as they were prior to
the start of constrnetion of the Carnelian Ave. fleeway bridge.
Name: (printed) Stxeet Address Signature:
Phone{ City, State Zip Date:
90~- q~f- i~4~2 -f~tT',~- )~,h~,, C,'q 9l~t i
~2~~ '~- & l, ,, ~s~ee, Add re,,"~77:,_,"~_'
Ptone: City, State Zipate~/
Name: ~ted) S~eet Ad&ess SinCere:
~bone: Ci~, State Zip Date:
Name: (p~ted) / S~eet Ad~ss ' '
Name: ~mted) S~eet Address Si~a~re:
Phone~ Ci~, State Zip Date:
Name: (p~ted) . Signa~e:
/ '
Name: ~mted) S~eet Ad&ess Si~a~re:
Phon~: ' Ci~, State Zip
v'
Petition for the Removal
Of Stop Signs on Sapphire Street
at Highland and Lemon/Marble.
Petition: Whereas:
1) the need for control devices at the above intersections has been removed by the
opening of Carnelian Avenue north of 19t" Street,
2) the normal flow of traffic allows safe and f~equent openings for access from cross
streets at Sapphire,
3) Sapphire is an arterial street with no westerly alternate route,
4) the great majority of traffic flows on Sapphire Street,
5) the signs result in 16,000 unnecessary, air polluting, energy wasting stops and starts
per day,
6) relatively few homes are located west of Sapphire and there is no through route west
of Sapphire,
7) the smooth and expedient flow of traffic on Sapphire Street is impeded by the
nuisance placement of these signs;
we, the undersigned, hereby request that the 4-way stops at Sapphire and Highland Ave.
and at Sapphire and Lemon/Marble be returned to 2-way stop status as they were prior to
the start of construction of the Carnelian Ave. freeway bridge.
Name: (printed) Street Address i re:
(2/-t,~fJ--,~ ? Tffo~^,~ &fly GF-TP/4,E-fE 4T
Phone: City, State Zip
Pho.e: ,, 70, D;.;__ ?-
t
Phoae: i , e i Date:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
F5
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
,At,k, Zcr-,,,
Petition for the Removal
Of Stop Signs on Sapphire Street
at Highland and Lemon/Marble.
Petition: Whereas:
1) the need for control devices at the above intersections has been removed by the
opening of Caruelian Avenue north of 19tn Street,
2) the normal flow of traffic allows safe and frequent openings for access from cross
streets at Sapphire,
3) Sappbjre is an arterial street with no westerly alternate route,
4) the great majority oftraf~c ~ows on Sapphire Street,
5) the signs result in 16,000 unnecessary, air polluting, energy wasting stops and starts
per day,
6) relatively few homes are located west of Sapphire and there is no through route west
of Sapphire,
7) the smooth and expedient flow of traffic on Sapphire Street is impeded by the
nuisance placement of these signs;
we, the undersigned, hereby request that the 4-way stops at Sapphire and Highland Ave.
and at Sapphire and Lemon/Marble be returned to 2-way stop status as they were prior to
the start of construction of the Carnelian Ave. freeway bridge.
Name: (,printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Z. ip Date:
fo9 ~,~c7 :~r6 pt'~- Lo~/d-~t q/7~l /2_-z~--~9~
Phone: ·
City, State Zip
~one: ' tare i Dat~.< ,.,k' '
Phone: City, Stat~ Zi~ D~te:
. Name: (printed) Stxeet Address
Phone: ' ' City, State Zip Date:
Petition for the Removal
Of Stop Signs en S pphire Street
at Highland and Lemon/Marble.
Petition: Whereas:
1) the need for control devices at the above intersections has been removed by the
opening of Carnelian Avenue north of 19t~ Street,
2) the normal flow of traffic allows safe and frequent openings for access from cross
streets at Sapphire,
3) Sapphire is an arterial street with no westerly aRemate route,
4) the great majority of traffic flows on Sapphire Street,
5) the signs result in 16,000 unnecessary, air polluting, energy wasting stops and starts
per day,
6) relatively few homes are located west of Sapphire and there is no through route west
of Sapphire,
7) the smooth and expedient flow of traffic on Sapphire Street is impeded by the
nuisance placement of these signs;
we, the undersigned, hereby request that the 4-way stops at Sapphire and Highland Ave.
and at Sapphire and Lemon/Marble be returned to 2-way stop status as they were prior to
the start of construction of the Carnelian Ave. fleeway bridge.
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip /' {Date:
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
ri~ e Street Address Si tu%e:
Date:
Phone: ' , '
c~~./.~,~.. UZ~ ~2/ 7~¥/ ';- '~ ~ '~
F'
Petition for the Removal
Of Stop Signs on Sapphire Street
at Highland and Lemon/Marble.
Petition: Whereas:
1) the need for control devices at the above intersections has been removed by the
opening of Carnelian Avenue north of 19tn Street,
2) the normal flow of traffic allows safe and f~equent openings for access from cross
streets at Sapphire,
3) Sapphire is an arterial street with no westerly alternate route,
4) the great majority of traffic flows on Sapphire Street,
5) the signs result in 16,000 unnecessary, air polluting, energy wasting stops and starts
per day,
6) relatively few homes are located west of Sapphire and there is no through route west
of Sapphire,
7) the smooth and expedient flow of traffic on Sapphire Street is impeded by the
nuisance placement of these signs;
we, the undersigned, hereby request that the 4-way stops at Sapphire and Highland Ave.
and at Sapphire and Lemon/Marble be returned to 2-way stop status as they were prior to
the start of constructinn of the Carnelian Ave. fzeeway bridge.
Name: (,printed) Street Address ~e:
..L., ,- K' . , , . ~. ~ C'2 H- I .J_ ,~ J , · .-. .
Phone: 4 City, State Zip /' >'Date:
7c~? ~-Z r-~.: ~' / -~ 7/4. J-~.,., ,i
P i')e: ( City, State Zip D
,{a<, ffr-'Sf~< C.',/,.,-,d C~ '/t'7p,'-~ /Z--
II
YSo-,:7o ..Z-f:---. 4.,-,--- ./
'Date:
ame' r~ e ' ' ' ~
Petition for the Removal
Of Stop Signs on Sapphire Street
at Highland and Lemon/Marble.
Petition: Whereas:
1) the need for control devices at the above intersections has been removed by the
opening of Carnelian Avenue north of 19m Street,
2) the normal flow of traffic allows safe and frequent openings for access from cross
streets at Sapphire,
3) Sapphire is an arterial street with no westerly alternate route,
4) the g~eat majority of traffic flows on Sapphire Street,
5) the signs result in 16,000 unnecessary, air polluting, energy wasting stops and starts
per day,
6) relatively few homes are located west of Sapphire and there is no through route west
of Sapphire,
7) thesmoothandexpcdientfiowoftrafficonSapphireStreetisimpededbythe
nuisance placement of these signs;
we, the undersigned, hereby request that the 4-way stops at Sapphire and Highland Ave.
and at Sapphire and Lemon/Marble be returned to 2-way stop status as they were prior to
the start of construction of the Camelinn Ave. freeway bridge.
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
/ City, State Zip
Name: (printed) Street Address i
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
9o~ ~? /qby n~dn ~m,4
Name: (printed) i Street Address Signaturg
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
~o~- -,,~-~ ~. ~.-~
Phone: City, State Zip '~_/ire: |
~ ,,
Petition for the Removal
Of Stop Signs on Sapphire Street
at Highland and Lemon/Marble.
Petition: Whereas:
1) the need for control devices at the above intersections has been removed by the
opening of Carnelian Avenue north of 19tn Street,
2) the normal flow of traffic allows safe and frequent openings for access from cross
streets at Sapphire,
3) Sapphire is an arterial street with no westerly alternate route,
4) the great majority of traffic flows on Sapphire Street,
5) the signs result in 16,000 unnecessary, air polluting, energy wasting stops and starts
per day,
6) relatively few homes are located west of Sapphire and there is no through route west
of Sapphire,
7) the smooth and expedient flow of traffic on Sapphire Street is impeded by the
nuisance placement of these signs;
we, the undersigned, hereby request that the 4-way stops at Sapphire and Highland Ave.
and at Sapphire and Lemon/Marble be returned to 2-way stop status as they were prior to
me start o~ con~tt ttetion of the Carnelian Ave. freeway bridge.
Name: (printed) Street Address Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date: ' "~
' D tie:
P~one: City, State Zip
L ' '
Phone: City, State Zip D ate:
Na,me: (printed) Street Address Signature:
City, State Zip Date: /
Petition for the Removal
Of Stop Signs on Sapphire Street
at Highland and Lemon/Marble.
Petition: Whereas:
1) the need for control devices at the above intersections has been removed by the
opening of Carnelian Avenue north of 19tn Street,
2) the normal flow of traffic allows safe and frequent openings for access from cross
streets at Sapphire,
3) Sapphire is an arterial street with no westerly alternate route,
4) the great majority of traffic flows on Sapphire Street,
5) the signs result in 16,000 unnecessary, air polluting, energy wasting stops and starts
per day,
6) relatively few homes are located west of Sapphire and there is no through route west
of Sapphire,
7) the smooth and expedient flow of traffic on Sapphire Street is impeded by the
nuisance placement of these signs;
we, the undersigned, hereby request that the 4-way stops at Sapphire and Highland Ave.
and at Sapphire and Lemon/Marble be returned to 2-way stop status as they were prior to
the start of construction of the Carnelian Ave. freeway bridge.
Name: (printed) Street Address M-i ¢tl4~'~_~t::, ~,t/~ Signature:
Phone: City, State Zip Date:
~hone: ' ,a,e, .~Z3 9/~'/
ame: rin e Street Address / i ' :
Phone: City, State Zip ·
Petition for the Removal
Of Stop Signs on Sapphire Street
at Highland and Lemon/Marble.
Petition: Whereas:
1) the need for control devices at the above intersections has been removed by the
opening of Carnelian Avenue north of 19th Street,
2) the normal flow of traffic allows safe and frequent openings for access from cross
streets at Sapphire,
3) Sapphire is an arterial street with no westerly alternate route,
4) the great majority of traffic flows on Sapphire Street,
5) the signs result in 16,000 unnecessary, air polluting, energy wasting stops and starts
per day,
6) relatively few homes are located west of Sapphire and there is no through route west
of Sapphire,
7) the smooth and expedient flow of traffic on Sapphire Street is impeded by the
nuisance placement of these signs;
we, the undersigned, hereby request that the 4-way stops at Sapphire and Highland .Ave.
and at Sapphire and Lemon/Marble be returned to 2-way stop status as they were prior to
me start ox constructtun of the Cm,,elian Ave. freeway bridge.
Ph " ' ~ a ~p '
lq~rn~ (prin~d~ ~tr~ ~dr~ I ~ ~tur~