HomeMy WebLinkAbout84-60 - ResolutionsRESOLUTION NO. 84-60
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING FOR THE FILING OF REBUTTAL
ARGUMENTS FOR BALLOT PROPOSITION RELATING TO THE INCURRING
OF A BONDED INDEBTEDNESS SECURED BY A SPECIAL TAX TO PAY FOR
CAPITAL FACILITIES IN A COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT
WHEREAS, a special municipal election is to be held in the CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA (hereinafter referred to as the "local Agency"),
at which time there will be submitted to the qualified electors of said City
certain propositions relating to the authorization to levy a special tax and
the incurring of a bonded indebtedness to pay for certain capital facilities
pursuant to the provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of
1982", in a Community Facilities District known as
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 84-1
(DAY CREEK DRAINAGE SYSTEM)
(hereinafter referred to as the "District"); and
WHEREAS, the mailed ballot proposition to be submitted
fled electors is generally set forth as follows:
Shall the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Com-
munity Facilities District No. 84-1 (Day
Creek Drainage System) incur a bonded
indebtedness in an amount not to
exceed $20,225,000.00, to finance
certain public capital drainage improve-
ment to meet the needs of new develop-
ment within the Community
Facilities District, including all
appurtenant work necessary and inciden-
tal expenses, said indebtedness to be
secured by annually levied special
taxes?
to the quali-
YES
NO
WHEREAS, this legislative body is authorized by a majority vote to al-
low the filing of rebuttal arguments for any City measure submitted at a munic-
ipal election.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HE f RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct.
SECTION 2: That if any person submits an argument against the pro-
posed ballot proposition relating to the incurring of a bonded indebtedness to
be secured by a special tax to pay for certain capital facilities in a communi-
ty facilities district, and an argument has been filed in favor of the City
measure, the City Clerk shall then immediately send copies of that argument to
the persons filing the argument in favor of said City ballot proposition. The
persons filing the argument in favor of the City measure may prepare and submit
a rebuttal argument not exceeding 250 words. The City Clerk shall then send
copies of the argument in favor of the measure to the persons filing the argu-
ment against the City measure, who then may prepare and submit a rebuttal argu-
ment to the argument in favor of the City measure, not exceeding 250 words.
The rebuttal arguments shall be filed with the City Clerk not more than ten
(10) days after the final date for filing direct argument. Rebuttal arguments
shall be printed in the same manner as direct arguments, and each rebuttal ar-
gument shall immediately follow the direct argument which it seeks to rebut.
Resolution No. 84-60
Page 2
SECTION 3: This right of rebuttal, as provided by this Resolution, is
applicable only to the ballot proposition relating to this Community Facilities
District, and shall not apply to any future municipal elections.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 7th day of March, 1984.
AYES: Dahl, Buquet, Mikels, Schlosser, Frost
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ATTEST:
Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk
i