HomeMy WebLinkAbout89-048 - Resolutions RESOLUTION NO. 89-048
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA APPROVING A REQUEST FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 13738,
TO PERMIT DEVELOPMENT OF AN 18-LOT RESIDENTIAL
SUBDIVISION ON 12.88 ACRES OF LAND IN THE VERY LOW
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT AND LOCATED SOUTH OF ALMOND STREET
AND WEST OF SAPPHIRE STREET - APN: 1061-091-03
A. Recitals.
(i) Rodine Companies Inc. has filed an application for the
approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 13738 described above in the title of this
Resolution. Hereafter, in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract
request is referred to as "the Tentative Tract".
(ii) On September 14, 1988, the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the subject matter
of the Tentative Tract, and following the conclusion of said hearing, adopted
their Resolution No. 88-177 (attached as Exhibit "1") thereby approving the
Tentative Tract.
(iii) The applicant has filed a timely appeal of the approval
represented in said Resolution No. 88-177 on the basis of several Conditions
contained in said Resolution. The Conditions appealed are described as listed
on attached Exhibit "2".
(iv) On November 16, 1988, the City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed pubic hearing on the subject matter of the
appeal of the Tentative Tract and, on said date referred the subject matter of
the appeal back to the -Planning Commission to review the Supplemental
Information received by the City Council.
(v) On December 14, 1988, the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the subject matter
of the Tentative Tract, and following the conclusion of said hearing,
recommended to the City Council the deletion of Condition Nos. 3 and 7 under
the Tentative Tract Map heading, and the retention of all other conditions in
said Resolution No. 88-177.
(vi) On January 18, 1989, the City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the subject matter of the
appeal of the Tentative Tract and, on said date concluded the public hearing.
(vii) All- legal prerequisites .to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does
hereby resolve as follows:
Resolution No. 89-048
Page 2
1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set
forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. This Council hereby finds and certifies that the project has
been reviewed and considered in compliance With the California Environmental
Quality Act of 1970 and concurs with the issuance of the mitigated Negative
Declaration issued on September 14, 1988.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council
during the above-referenced January 18, 1989 hearing, including written staff
reports* the minutes of the above-referenced September 14, 1988, and December
14, 1988, Planning Commission meetings, the contents of Planning Commission
Resolution No. 88-177, and the Developer's written and oral testimony, this
Council specifically finds as follows:
a. The Tentative Tract applies to property located west of Sapphire
Street and south of Almond Street within the Very Low
Residential District (less than 2 dwelling .units per.acre);
b. The property to the north is within the Hillside Residential and
is currently vacant, the property to the south and east is
within the Very Low Residential District and is currently
developed, and the property to the west is a City of Los Angeles
Department of Water and Power Utility Right-of-Way.
c. The Tentative Tract contemplates the development of an 18-lot
subdivision on 12.88 acres of land;
d. The requirements of Planning Commission Resolution No. 88-177
remain to be important and necessary to the subdivision of the
property except for the following modifications:
1. Delete Condition No. 3 and 7 under the Tentative Tract Map
heading; and
2. Change the first word "Surety" to "Security" in Standard
Condition No. U~' 7.; and
e. The development as specified will not contradict the goals or
objectives of the General Plan or Development Code of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga and would not promote a detrimental
condition to the persons or properties in the immediate vicinity
of the subject site.
4. Based on the substantial evidence presented to this Council
during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of
facts set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Council hereby finds and
concludes as follows:
a. The Tentative Tract is consistent with the General Plan and
Development Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga;.
Resolution No. 89-048
Page 3
b. The design or improvements of the Tentative Tract is consistent
with the General Plan and Development Code of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga;
c. The subject site is physically suitable for the type of
development proposed;
d. The design of the proposed development is not likely to cause
substantial environmental damage or avoidable injury to humans
or wildlife or their habitat;
e. The development is not likely to cause serious health problems;
f. The design of the development will not conflict with any
easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for
access through or use of the property within the proposed
development; and
9. The requirement that the Developer pay in-lieu fees for the
future undergrounding of existing overhead utilities (Condition
2. under the Tentative Tract Map h~ading) does meet the
requirements set forth in Government Code Section 66001 in terms
of (1) purpose (2) use (3) type of development, and (4) need.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs
1, 2, 3, and 4 above, ihis-Council hereby approves the Tentative Tract subject
to all of the Conditions set forth in Planning Commission Resolution No. 88-
177 (a copy of which is attached hereto and marked as Exhibit "1") except for
the following modifications:
a. Delete Condition Nos. 3 and 7 under the Tentative Tract Map
heading; and
b. Change the first word "Surety" to Security" in Standard
Condition No. L.7.
6. The Council hereby provides notice to Rodine Companies, Inc.
that the time within which judicial review of the decision represented by the
Resolution must be sought is governed by the provisions of California Code of
Civil Procedure Section 1094.6.
7. The City Clerk is hereby directed to: (a) certify to the
adoption of this Resolution, and (b) forthwith transmit a certified copy of
this Resolution, by Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested, to Rodine
Companies, Inc. at their address as per City records.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 1st day of February, 1989.
AYES: Alexander, Brown, Buquet, Stout, Wright
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
Resolution No. 89-048
Page 4
~'Dennis L. S~cout, Mayor
ATTEST:
Beverly A~/Authelet, City Clerk
I, BEVERLY A. AUTHELET, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed,
approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 1st day of
February, 1989.
Executed this 2nd day of February, 1989 at Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Resolution No. 89-048
Page 5
EXHIBIT "1"
RESOLUTION NO. 88-177
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING CO~ISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 13738,
AJqD DESIGN REVIEl~ THEREOF, LOCATED SOUTH OF A~IOND AND
WEST OF SAPPHIRE IN THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
(LESS THAN 2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE). APN: 1061-091-03
A. Recitals.
(i) Rodine Companies Inc. has filed an application for the
approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 13738 as described in the title of this
Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map
request is referred to as "the application".
(ii) On the 14th of September, 1988, the Planning Conmnission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the
application and concluded said hearing on that date.
(iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts
set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced public hearing on September 14, 1988, including
written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this
Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
(a) The application applies to property located on the west
side of Sapphire Street, south of Almond Avenue with a street frontage of 580
feet along Sapphire Street and 455 feet along Almond Avenue and is presently
vacant; and
(b) The property to the north of the subject site is vacant
and designated for Hillside Residential, the property to the south of that
site consists of single family residential in the Ve~ Low Residential
District, the property to the east is single family residential in the Very
Low Residential District, and the property to the west is vacant and
designated as Los Angeles Bureau of Power and Light easement.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of
facts set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and
concludes as follows:
Resolution No. 89-048
Page 6
{a) That tentative tract is consistent with the
General Plan, Development Code, and specific
plans; and
{b) The design or improvements of the tentative
tract is consistent with the General Plan,
Development Code, and specific plans; and
(c) The site is physically suitable for the type of
development proposed; and
{d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to
cause substantial environmental damage and
avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or
their habitat; and
{e} The tentative tract is not likely to cause
serious public health problems; and
{f) The design of the tentative tract will not
conflict with any easement acquired by the
public at large, now of record, for access
through or use of the property within the
proposed subdivision.
4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has
been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental
Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative
Declaration.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph
1, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to
each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard
Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
Design Review
1. The shape of the window panes on Model 1500 shall be square in
shape rather than rectangular.
2. The round vent element shall be provided with more finished
details, such as louvers or surrounding trim, on all deviations.
3. The round vent on the rear elevation of Model iO00A shall be
increased in size.
4. The square window on the front elevation of Model IO00B, Type 1,j
shall be changed in shape to be more compatible with window shapes on the
three other elevations.
5. The following roof tile colors shall be omitted: "Life style
Mission" (#132) and "Life style Padre Brown" (#110).
Resolution No. 89-048
Page 7
6. Tree Removal Permit No. 88-16 is approved subject to replacement
planting in accordance with Municipal Code Section 19.08.100. Existing trees
to be retained shall be protected in accordance with Municipal Code Section
19.08.110.
Tentative Tract Map
1. Provide a drainage acceptance letter authorizing public areas to
drain onto private land.
2. Overhead Utilities:
a. Sapphire Street An in-lieu fee as contribution to the
future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities
(telecommunications and electrical) on the opposite (east)
side of Sapphire Street shall be paid to the City prior to
approval of the Final Map. The fee shall be one-half the
City adopted unit amount times the length from the center
of Almond Street to the south tract boundary.
b. Almond Street The existing overhead utilities on the
project side of Almond Street shall be undergrounded from
the first pole on the east side of Sapphire Street to the
first pole west of the centerline of the Los Angeles Bureau
of Power and Light Easement prior to public improvement
acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. For the
portion within the utility easement (electrical and
telecommunication) the developer may request a
reimbursement agreement to receive one-half the City
adopted cost for undergrounding from future development
(redevelopment) as it occurs on the opposite side of the
street. For the portion adjacent to the tract, an in-lieu
fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the
utilities on the opposite (north side of almond Street
(electrical) shall be paid to the City prior to Final Map
approval. The fee shall be one-half the difference between
the undergrounding cost of the utilities (electrical) on
the opposite side of the street minus those
{telecommunications) on the project side times the length
from the center of Sapphire Street to the first pole
containing both electrical and telecommunication lines west
of the west tract boundary.
3. The southerly one half {26 foot of pavement) street improvements
along Almond Street shall be extended from the tract westerly to the
centerline of the Los Angeles Bureau of Power and Light Easement.
4. All street shall have a centerline crown section. Street tilt
sections are not permitted.
5. The dedication for the north half (33 feet) of Almond Street
from Skyline Road to the east side of Sapphire Street shall be obtained in
accordance with Condition 6 to follow.
Resolution No. 89-048
Page 8
6. The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the
required off-site property interest necessary to construct the required off-
site improvements. If the developer should fail to do so, the developer
shall, at least 120 days prior to submittal of the final map for approval,.
enter into an agreement with the City to complete the improvements pursuant to
Government Code Section 66462 at such time at the City acquires the property
interests required for the improvements. Such agreement shall provide for
payment by developer of all costs in connection with the subdivision.
Security for these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit. That portionl
of the security reflecting the value of the required off-site property
interest shall be the amount given in an' appraisal report obtained by
developer, at developer's cost. The appraiser shall have been approved by the
City prior to commencement of the appraisal.
7. An emergency access road per Foothill Fire District's
requirements shall be provided along Almond Street to Turquoise Street.
8. A sidewalk shall be provided on one side only of the interior
street.
9. The Almond Intercept Master Plan Channel (Line lA) shall be
constructed from the existing portion to the southwest extending to a
northerly projection of the east side of Sapphire Street or as otherwise
necessary to provide drainage protection for the Tract as approved by the City
Engineer. The cost of constructing the facility is eligible for
reimbursements in accordance with City Ordinance No. 75.
10. Almond Street shall be constructed full width from Henry
Street to Sapphire Street. A reimbursement agreement may be requested for the
cost of improvements of the north half of the street from future development
on the north side of the street.
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption
of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1988.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
La,~ry-'T. ~ ~ ~ /'' """'"
ATTEST~r da~_~ J e ~r~eta ry
Resolution No. 89-048
Page 9
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of
Reimbursements in Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution
was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Reimbursements in Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of
the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of September, 1988, by the
following vote-to-wit:
AYES: CO~ISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY, EMERICK, CHITIEA, MC NIFL, TOLSTOY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COmmISSIONERS: NONE
0EPA~T#ENT OF C0NNUNITY DEVELOPHENT ~ 6, lb'for to approve! x~d ~o~tf~ of ~e fill rap, or prior
fssmm ~ ~fldlH ~mfts ~en no ~p fs Involved. ~rftten
ST~ CO~IT~S certlflcatl~ f~ ~e afl. ted ~ater district, ~at ade~ate s~r
and ~ater facilities are or ~t)1 be available to serve the pressed
p~Ject, sh~ll be su~ltted to ~e Deparment of C~n~ty
Deve)o~nt. ~ch letter ~ust h~ve been ~ssued by ~e ~ater district
~/V~ ~ ~ .~ln nf.ty (~) days prior to final ~p approval In ~e case of
~[CT: subdfv~st~ or Issuance of pemfts In the case of a11 o~er
~sf~ntlal projects. For p~oJects usln9 septic tank facilities
L~AT[~: ~ ~ ~O: ~ ~ ~A~H/~ tnfo~tl~, shall be obtained and su~ftted to the City.
SI te Develo~nt
~e f~ ~ am ~ftfms of
be developed tn accordance with ~e approved site plans
1.
~e
site
~ ftle tn ~e Plannln~ Division. the conditions ~onta~ned herein, and
C~ITIONS: bustness activity ~fng c~nced thereon all conditions of approval
shall be c~leted to ~e satisfaction of ~e Cfty Planner.
T~ Ltmfts ~
~ 2. Revised sf~e plans and bufldln
~. ~v~] ~)1 ~J~. unl~$ extended by ~e Pla~nf~ C~Jssf~. if c~dftlo~s of approval s~a11 be su~ftted for revle~ and approval by
~11dln9 ~mtts a~ not fssu~ or appmv~ use has not canc~ ~e Plannln9 Divtsf~ p~or ~ fss~ of ~11~
vl~ln ~nty-f~r (24) Wn~s f~ ~e ~ of app~vaT.
. 3. AlT site plans, grading plans, landscape and Irrigation plans, and
2. Develo~t~f~ Revf~ shall ~ acc~11sh~ prior ~ st~et I~vmnt plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior
~3. ~prov41 of Tentative Tract ~. Is grant~ subject to ~e ~Wt. htldl~ ~h. eK.) prtor
~e case of a cust~ lot subdivision, or app~ved use has c~nc~,
app~v41 of ~lchever c~s first.
4. This app~vai shaTT ~n vl~ ~e applicant a~ shall ~ veld u~ ~ 4. ~proval of ~ls re.est shall not valve C~114~ce vlth all sectfofls
a chan~ of ~hlp or If ~e busJ~ss ~rttl~ ceases, of the ~vel~nt C~, 411 othe~ applicable City 0rdfna~ces, and
5. ~lor ~ a~vll M ~tln of h ftMI wp, ~ ~lor ~ ~lldfng Pemit issuance.
Isle of ~fl~ ~ml~, ~ ~ s~dlvlsf~ Wp ts involved,
~ltten certJflcati~ f~ 411 eff~t~ ~h~l Districts shall ~ 5. ~ls p~J~t shall p~vl~ ~ mfnt~ percent of affordable
suMItted ~ Ge ~r~flt of ~nJty ~vel~nt ~ich States War housing a~d/or ~nts, Jn coflfo~nce
a~ate s~l f~llltl~ a~ or vtlT ~ ca~bTe of acc~tfn9 ~Tlcles. Affordablllty shall be detemlned by current mrket rates,
stuMnts ~rated by ~ls p~JKt. ~ch letter of certtflcatl~ mst ~nts and ~dlan fnc~ levels
have ~en Jss~d by ~e ~ol District vt~ln nifty (~) days prtor project. A ~velo~nt agre~nt to such shall be approved by the
to ~e final wp app~vll In ~e case of ~e subdlvtsl~ wp or City Counctl ~lor ~ Issw~e of
lssua~e of ~mlts In ~e case of 411 o~er ~sf~ntfal
-1-
Proaec o.' 7-/.
6. A detailed On-Site Lighting Plan shall be submitted for revtev and 15. All pa~vays, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanentl~
approval by the Planning Dfvtston prior to Issuance of befldlng mlntatned by a homonnore association or other Mans acceptable to
perlito. Such plan shall indicate style, t11mmlnetIGn, lncatlon, the City. Such proof of maintenance shell be subettted to th
height and method of shielding, so as not to adversely affect adjacent · Planning and Engineering Divisions prior to Issuance of hellion
proper ti es.
petal ts.
trash receptacles are previdad, all trash pick-up 16. Recroatlonal amenities are required in conjunction with common ope
7.
If
central I zed
publlcSha11 bevies.for Individual units with all receptacles shielded fr(xi spuce areas such as, but not limited to, svtmmtng puols and spas, an,
court facilities. In addition, enclosed tot lot facilities with play
equipment and large open la~n areas are required. Details shall be
8. Trash receptacle(s) are requtred and shell be encloned by a 6 foot Included In flue1 landscapu plans.
htgh masonry vail with solid view obstroctlng gates pursuant to City
standards. LOCation shell be subject to approval by the Plonnlng ~ ]7. Solar access Msewento abel1 be dedicated for the purpose of assuain9
Division.
that each lot or deelllng unit shall have the right to receive
sunlight across adjacent lots or units for use of a solar energy
9. AI1 ground nc.atari utility npportonances such as transfomere shall be system. ?he easewents My be contained in a declaration of
located out of pebllc view of the lain building area and adequately ~r?~trfctlons for the subdivision ~htch shall be rocorda4 concur~fltly
screened through the use or cuabinatfon of concrete or masonry valls, mm the recordltfm of the flnol mep or Issuanoe of pomtts,
bemfng, and landscaping, whichever CGmeS first. ~11e easements shell prohibit the casting of
vegetetlon, stroctures, fixtures or any ether object.
by
10. Street ~mes shell be revtoned and approved by the City Planner, In except for utility wiros and stwilar objects, pursuant to Develo~ent
accordance with the adopted Street Naming Policy, prior to Ipprmeel Code Section
end recordetlMI of I~e Fram1 TrKt Nap.
C. Building Design
II. Al1 butldfnD's numbers and Indtvgdoal units shall be Identified In s
clear nod concise Banner, tncledleg proper 111Lgllnatlon, I. An alteroatIve energy system Is required to provtde dmeestlc hot water
for all dee111flg units and for heating any swimming puD1 or spa. AT!
12, Local and 14aster Planned Equestrian Trails shall be provided swimming pnols Installed at the ttmm of tntttal developMnt shall
throughout the tract in accordance with the Equestrian Trail Plun. A supplemented with solar heating. Sular energy shah be the prlmr.,
detailed equestrian trail plea Indicating widths, mximum slopes, energy system unless other altereatlve energy systems are d~onstrated
phystcnl conditlnoS, fencing and meed control, tn uccordance with City to be of equivalent capacity and efffcloncy. Details shall be
equestrian trot1 standard drawings, shell be submitted for review and Included tn the buildtng plans and shell be reviewed and approved
approval by the Plaonfng Division prior to approval end recordation of prior to Issuance of bmJldgng pemits.
the Flnol Tract Nap, and prior to G~,~Gval of strut improvement nM
~ec&dln~ plons, Developer shall grade and construct all trails, 2. Energy conserving appliances and fixtures are required to be
ludlng fonclog and drainage devices go conjunction with street Incorporated Into this project to Include such things as, but not
Improvements. lIlithd to, reduced consumption shower heads, pilotless appliances,
water saving toilets, etc.
]3. the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CCLR's) shell not prohibit
the *keepfng of equine entmmls, dTere zoning roquIrc~aents for the ~t~ 3. D~elltng units shall be ConStructed with flro retardent Mtertal and
keepin? of said animals have been let. Indlvfdoal lot miners tn non-combustible roof arterial.
subdivisions shell have the option of keeping said onimmls without the
necessity of appealing to hoards of directors or holeomler's 4. All corner dwellings and t~o-story d~ellfngs shaT] have the side or
associations for alendnents to CC&R's, rear elevettne facing the street upgraded with additional wood trim
around winders and wood sldtng or piant-ons Mlere appropriate, subject
14. The Covenants, Conditions and Dectrictlons (CCLR's) and Articles of to review end approval by the City Planner prior to Issuance of
incorporation of the Hmlemmers Assnclutlon are subject to the belldtng
approval of the Plaonlng and Engineering 01visions and the Ctty
Attorney. l~ey shall be recorded concurrent with the Final IMp or S. Standard patio cover plans shall be sulxnJtted to and approved by the
prior to Issuance of belldlng penitts, whichever occurs first, A Plaonlng OtvtsJon and Building 0fflctal prior to Jssuaece of pulldlng
recorded copy shell be. provided to the City. perlits.
-2-
PROdECT NO.T~/-/~7~
6. A11 proposed roofing uaterial shall provide variation In color, /~3. Street trees, a alnimu~ of 15 gallon size or larger, shall be
thickness, and architectural style. A composite sample shall be Installed per City standard In accordance with the 14aster Plan of
submitted to and approved by the Planning Division prior ta issuance street trees for the Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga and shall be planted at
of building per. ts. an average of every 30' on tnterlor streets and 20' on exterior
streets.
7. All roof appurtenances, tocludtng air conditioners, shall be
architecturally Integrated, shielded from vlem and the sound buffered 4. A iInlmum of trees per gross acre, coaprtsed of the folloulng
from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning and sizes, the11 be provided within the project; ~ - 24' box or
Building Otvfsious. Details sba11 be Included in building plans, larger, $ - 15 galTou, and $ - 6 gallon.
I. Parking & Vehicular ~ccess (Indicate ~,-~, details on I~ildt~ pIons) S, A mtnlmom of $ of the trees planted wlthtn the project shaT1 be
specimen size trees - 24 Inch box or larger.
I. AlT parking lot landscaped tsZands shall have a mtofman outside
dtmenstou of 6' and shoTJ couture an 12' ~alk ad~acemt to perking 6. ¥lthin perkteg lots, trees sha11 be planted at a rate of one ~5-9allon
stall (Including curb), size tree for every 3 perking stalls, sufficient to shade 50 percent
of the perking area at.solar noon on August 21.
2. Texturiznd pedestrian pethuays across circulation aisles shall be
provided throughout the develoFe~ent to connect deelltngs with open 7, Trees shall be planted tn areas of public view adjacent to and along
spaces and recreational uses. structures at a rate of one tree per 30 Itnear feet of building ~htcb
has public exposure.
3. ATt perkklg spaces, aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per
-- City standards. /~ 8. All slope banks tn excess of five ($) feet In vertical height and of
2:I or greater slope shall be landscaped and Irrigated for eroston
__4. AI1 units thai1 be provided wtth automatic garage door openers tf control and soften thetr appearance as follons: one 16-gallon or
drIvou~ is less than 16 feet in depth free back of sldeealk, larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, one I-gallon or
larger size thrum per each lO0 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate
5. The Covenants, Coudtttous and Restrlctlous sba11 restrtct the storage ground cover, tn addition, slope banks tn excess of etght (8) feet In
of recreational vthicles on this site uflJess they are the prioctple vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one
source of transportation for the o~er and prohibit parking ou gallon or larger size tree per each 260 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees
Interior circulstiou aisles other than In designated visitor perking end shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary
areas, slope plane. Slope plontteg required by this section shall toclude a
permencnt Irrigation system to be Installed by the developer prior to
6. Any security gates shalT be submitted to and approved by the Plannln9 occupancy.
Division end Foothill Fire OIstrlct prier to Is~onnce of building
laemitso
a healthy and thriving condition by the deveToper until each
i. Landacapln~ IndtvldueT unit Is sold and occupied by the buyer. Prter to relousieg
X occupame~ for thuae units, an Inspection 5hall be conducted by the
1, A detailed landscape and Irrigation plan, Iocludlng slope planting, Planning Oivlslofl to determine t~at It
shall be submitted for revle~ and approval by the Plaonteg Division
prior th the Issuance of bulldthg perlite er prier to final map lO. All landscaped areas shall be ~alntalned In a healt~ and thriving
apl~val In the case of a custom 1et subdivision, coudttloa, free from weeds, trash, and debris.
2. Extstteg trees shall be retatned uberever possible. A Tree Removal Il. Front yard landscaping Is required and shall include, at a minimum,
Permtt, tocludleg a dotatled plan of existing trees sho~lng thetr one iS-pellon size tree, one S-gallon stze tree, seeded ground cover,
precise location, stze end type shall be submitted to and approved by and a permenent Irrigation system to be Installed by the developer
the planning Oivtston prier te approval of the rough grading plon. prior to occupancy. Thts requirement shall be tn addition to required
Satd plan shall take Into account the proposed gradtng, ~hat trees are street trees,
to be retained, trimlng methods, and ubero nee trees w111 be planted
for replacement of ree~ved trees.
-3-
~ 12. The ftonl design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping and ~/
side, elks sbe11 be Included in the required landscape plans and sbell ~% 4. The applicant sbe11 contact the U.S. PeltO1 Servtce to determine the
be subject to appruval by the planning Dfvtslon and coordinated for appropriate type and lonattoo of mall boxes. Wultt-famtly residential
consistency with any parkway landscaping plan ~hich wy be required by development shill provide solid overhead Structure for mt1 boxes with
the Engineering Division. adequate lighting.
I3. Special landscape features such ns mouedThg, alluvial roct, specSmon S. This project falls within the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Area.
..... Any participation by the Rancho Cucamenga Redevelopment Agency on this
size trees, meandering stdeealk$ (with horizontal change) and project, will require revlon and appruval of the development plons by
the Agency.
intensified
laodscnptng,
Is
along
/~ 6. Water and sneer plons sba11 be designed and constructed to meet
~ 14. Water and energy cooseruatton techniques are encouraged to be requtrooents of the Cecamenga County Water District (CCldD), Foothill
utilized, such as special Irrigation techniques (e.g., drip Ftro District and the Envtrmmental Health Department of the County of
Irrlgatfoo), drought tolerant pleat sbectes, alluvial reckscape, etc. San Berflardloo. A letter of compllonce fram CC~) will be required
prior to rocordetloo or Iss~once of permits.
X 15. Landscaping and trrlgetJoo systems required on public
to
be
Insthlled
right-of-way on the perimeter of this tract area shall be contThuonsly 7. This project site contains a designated historical lanc~ark. Any
wtntatned by the developer until accepted by the City and annexed alterutlon, remeval, relecatfne, or reconstruction requires revle~ and
Into the landscape maintenance district, approval by the Historic preservation Cmmlssion and City Council.
16. All retaining walls sbell be provlded w~th decorative treatment. BUILDING DIVXSIOII SHALL BE COFFTN:TEB FOR COlqPLIAJdGE WITH THE FOLLOWZRG CONDITIONS:
F. Signs H. Site Develolment
I. The signs Indicated on the submitted plans are not approved with this X I. The appllcont shall comply with the latest adopted untfone Building
approval. Any sties proposed for this development shall be designed Code, Uniform IqecbenJcal Code, Unfforu plumbing Code, #arlene1
tn cooforoaece ~th the Sign O~dlonnce and sba11 require separate £1ectrlc Code, and all other applicable codes, ordinances and
appltcatloo and approved by the PlannThg Division prior to ~/ regulations in effect at the time of issuance of relative permits.
Installation
~ 2. l~lor to Issuance of betiding pene~t for a new residential 6~elltng
2. A uniform sign progrum for this development sbe11 be submitted to the unit(s) or major eddttloo to an existing unit(s), the applicant shall
Plonntng Division for their revte~ and approval prior to issuance of pay development fees at the eathbltshod rate, Such fees may Include,
but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, park Fee, Drainage
hlldfng PermlU. Fee, ~ystems Develol~ent Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and
3. Directory monument sign(s) shall be provided for apartment, School Fees.
condominium or to,house projects prior to occupancy and shall require
co 3. P~or to Issuance et belldThg perolt for a new cmmerctal or
~ separate application and approval by the pIonnfng Dtvlstne prior to
Thdustrtal development or addition to an existing development, the
? Issuance of lmJld~g pas~t, applicant shall pay develOl~ont fees at the establlsbed rate. Such
o~ fees may included but not be limited to: S~,stems Developeent Fee,
co G. Other A~lencles Drainage Fee, Permit and Plon Checking Fees.
c~ /~ Z. Emergency secondary access shall be provided in accordance with X
~ Foothill Fire protection District Standards. __ 4. Street addresses $hall be provided by the Building Official.
O0 ~( 2. Emergency access shall be provided, maintenance Free and cleero a I. £xlstln~l Structures
-~ mtntmm of 26 feet wide at all times during construction in accordance
c~ with roothtll Fire District requirements. I. provide compliance with the Untforo Butldtng Code for property lion
~ .~ clearances constderfn9 use, area and ftre-neststtveness of existing
m° ~ 3. Ptdor to IssuanCe of Building i~rmlU for combustThle coostructlon,
e ~ evidence shall be submitted to the Foothtll Ffru District that
~ ~ temporary water supply for flru protection ts available, pending
complettoo of required fire protection systems.
-4-
PROJECT NO.'~_~
2. Exlstln9 building(s) sbell be made to comply with current Building and
Zoning regulations for the intended use or the building shall be d. Final grading plans for each parcel are to be subeitted to the
delollshed. Betiding and Safety Division for approval prior to Issuance of
building or grading permits. (This may be on an Incremental or
3. Existing sewage disposal facilities shall be removed, filled Dod/or composite basis.)
capped to cmlply with the Uniform Plud)thg Code, and Uniform Building
Code.
e. All slope banks in excess of five (5) feet in vertical height and
of $:1 or greater slope shall be seeded with native grasses upon
4. Underground on-site utilities are to be 1orated and shmm on building completion of grading or some other alternative ~ethod of erosion
plans subiitted for building permit appt$cation, control shall be co~leted to the satisfaction of the Building
Grading Official and City Planner. irrigation shall be provided to
germinate the seed and maintain growth for a period of 6
)~ i. Grading of the subject property sbell be in eccor~tance with the
after
germination.
Uniform Building Code, City Grading Standards and accepted grading [#GiNEF. RiNG DIVISION
practices. The final grading plan sbell be in substantial confomonce
with the approved conceptual grading plan. K. Dedication and Vehicular Access
X 2. A soils report sbell be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by ~ 1. Dedications sbell be made by final map of all interior street rights-
the State of California to perform such mark. of-way and ail necessary easements as sho~n on the tentative map,
~ iocluding Co~ofty Equestrton Trot1 rights-of-way and Local Feeder
3. Your de~elolment is located within the soft erosion control Equestrton Troll onsononts.
beeedartes; a Soil Ellsturbeece Nrmft is required. Please contact San
Bereardion Coenty Dept. of Agriculture at (7~4) 38Z-21El for permit ~ 2. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the
applicatthn. Dncumentotton of such permit shall be submitted to the following streets (measured from street conterltne):
City prior to ~$S~lsr, e of rengh grading permllt. ~- total feet on
4. R geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or
geologist and submitted st the tine of application for grading plan total feet on
check.
X The grading plans shall be coswleted and approved grtor to
total
feet
off
S.
final
issuonce of I~llidlng imsllt, s. total feet on
6. As e custom-lot subdivision, the .foilenlng requlresnonts shall be ent: 3. Irrevocable offer of dedication for foot wide roadway easement
the1! be made for all private streets or drives.
a. Surety she1! be posted and an agre~nt executed g#aronteeing
completion of ell ne-site drainage facilities necessary for 4. Corner property line radius will be required per City Standards and
de.storing all parcels, to the satisfaction of the Building end drewlngs.
Safety Division ImJor to r~ofllitlm of Um ml~ ~nd ~rlor to Um
Uon-vehlco~aF access sbell be dedicated to the City for the folio~thg
b. Appropriate easements, for safe disposal of drathage water that streets:. --~/~}0~ /~}~
.re con-.tied on, or or., . ocon. p. ls..rn to bu bell.eat, ' ' '
and recot'ded to ~e satisfaction of the Building and Safety
Division I~o~ to Issoonce of ~ grading add bolldlllg permits. 6. Reciprocal access easements and maintenance agreements ensurtng access
c. On-site drainage Iaprnvemants, necessary for dematerlng or to all parcels and Joint maintenance of all comon roads, drives er
protecting the subdivided properties, are to be installed prior to parking areas shall be provided by CC&R'S or by deeds and thall be
issuance of building permits for construction upon any parcel that recorded concurrent with the map or prior to issuance of bulldtn9
may be subject to, or contributes to drainage flo~s entering, permit, ~ore no map Is involved.
leaving or ~lthln n parcel relative to ~t~lch · building permit ts ~ Z. Private drainage easeeents for cross-lot drainage shall be required
requested, and shall be delineated or noticed on the final map.
-5-
PROJECi~.
V
~ h Surety posted and an agreneent executed to the satisfaction
7.
shall
be
8. AIl existing easements lying within future right-of-way are to be of the City Engineer and the City Attorney, guaranteeing c0apletton of
qultclahled or to be delineated on the ~ap per City Engineer's the public end/or ,,rlvate street teprovenents, prior to agproval of
requirements, the Ftnal Nap or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs
first.
g. Easeeents for sidewalks for ,,ubllc uses sba11 be dedicated to the City
where sidewalks leonder through private property. 8. Street tl~roveMnt plnes per City standard for the private streets or
drives shall be required for review and appruval by the Ctty £ngtneer.
L. Street l~oruveients
X g. Prior to aa), nerk being perforled on the private streets or drives,
I. Construct full street tlpreve~ents Iocludtng, but not limited to, curb fees shall be paid and s construction pemlt shall be obtained free
and gutter, A.C. pavelent, sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway trees the City Engineer's Office, in addition to any other per~tts required.
and
street
lights
on
interior
public
streets.
~ tO. AIl street I~proveeeats shall be Installed to the satisfaction of the
X 2. A mintmu~ of ~6-foot Nde payment within a 4U-foot wide dedicated City Engineer.
be
constructed
for
half-section
streets.
~ Il. Pavewent striping, larking, traffic and street na~e signing shall be
~ 3. Construct the following liprovee~flts lncludtngo but not lleltnd to: installed per the requlrelonts of the City Traffic Engineer.
CURB & A.C. SLUE- UXIl~ ~lRttl A.C. I~EUJAN ~ IZ. Existing city roads requiring reconstruction shall retain open for
STREET R~IE GUTTER pVNT. VALE ~ePl~. LIGtlTS OVERLAY ISL~O OTHER trufftc at all tiles with adequate detours during construction. A
) street closure per~lt my be required. A cash deposit shall be
Al on, X X ,X {if) ro ,red to coee,' th. co,t o, ored'ng and ,,av,ng. wh, , ,,,,1 he
refunded on colpletfon of the construction to the satisfaction of the
I : · -- [3. Nalk~ayl shall be prevlded between public sidewalks and on-stir
pedu~trion areas.
14. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cress sidewalks. Under stdewalk
drains shall be Installed to City Standards.
15. A penlit ~tll be required free CalTrons for any ~ork within the
NOTES: Ia) If C under sidewalk, ft shall be curvfltnear per STO 304. (b) Nedlan follewfng right-of-way:
Islond Includes-landscaping and irrigation on later. (c) L.A. (lien ngreelent) or
Fee (In-lieu fee) ~[qll be p.r~vided for the Ite~ so aerked.
) 'rr ul .. ora.V once ond ..ed Cont,.,
co )~ 4. Prior to any )~ork being perfoneed In the pabltc right-of-way, fees /~ 1. The applicant wtll be responsible for construction of all on-site
'~ drainage facilities ruqufred by the Building Official.
o shall be paid and an encreaclment pemft sbe11 be obtained rrm the
I City Engineer's Office, tn nddltfon to any other pemtts required.
o~ Z. Intersection drains will be required at the follewlng locations:
co X S. Street tmprevment plans Including parkway trees and street lights
(~ prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City
:~ Engineer shall be required for all pebllc streets prior to issuance of
an encroachlent perltt. Ftonl plans and profiles sba11 sho~ the 3. The project (er portions thereof) is located within a Flood Hazard
~ location of all existing utility facilities within the right-of-lay. Zone, therefore, flood protection leasures shall be provided as
0 certified by a Registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City
tn 6. A separate parkley and/or indian Island landscape and Irrigation plan Engineer.
~ per City Stander. ds shal~ be ~vlded subject to a. pproval o~ the ~
protect the structures by diverting sheet runoff to streets, or to a
~ ' store drain.
-6-
PROJECT NO.~
~ S. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of
surface drainage entering the property fro~ adjacent areas. 6. An easeeent for a Joint use driveway shall be provided prior to
appreval of the Final Nap or Issuance of building permits. ~ichever
6. The following street(s) shall be designed as major water carrying occurs first, for:
street(s) requiring a ceebtnation of special curb heights, cemerclal
type drive approaches, rolled street connections, flood protection
walls, and/or landscaped earth benes and rolled driveways at property ,/
line: ~ 7. Notice of Intention to form and/or join the Lighting and Landscaping
~ District shall be flied with the City Council prior to recordation of
7. A final drainage study shall be sulxmltted to and approved by the City the map or Issuance of building permits, ~lchever occurs first.
Engineer prior to appreval of the Final Nap or Issuance of building
permits. ~ichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be
thstalle~ as required by the City Eaglneer.
~ 8. A permit irma the County Flood Control 01strict Is required for ~ork
~lthtn its right-of-way.
~. Utilities
~ ]. Prevl~ utility services to each parcel Including sanitary
separate
sewerage~syste~o mater, gas, electric po~er, telephone, and cable TV
(al1 undergreand) lA acco~daoce ~th the Utility Standards. Easements
shall b~ provided as required.
X 2. The daveloper shall be responsible for the relocation of existing
utilitlea as necessary.
O. General Requirements and ~provals
A puree1 map sbell be recordad prior to first phase subdivision to
prevent creatloa of unrecognized pereels.
2. The following perimeter landscaped perlcways are required to be annexed
Into the landscape mlnten*nce district:
3. prior to recordation, a Motlce of Intention to form and/or Join
Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City
Council. The engineering costs tnvolved in District Formation shall
be borne by the dsveloper.
4. Notice of Intention to Join the median Island Landscape 14athtenence
District shall be filed ~lth the Ctty Council prior to appreval of the
Final Nap or Issuance of bulldthg permits, ~lchever occurs first.
S. The separate existing parcels contained within the project boundaries
shall be legally cmablned Into one parcel prior to the Issuance of
building permits.
-7-
Resolution No. 89-048 Page 17
BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF R~-NCHO CUCAMONGA
In re the Application of Tentative Tract 13738
RODINE COMPANIES, INC., SECOND--SUPPLEMENT TO APPEAL
FROM DECISION OF
PLANNING COMMISSION
Applicant.
Applicant, Rodine Companies, Inc. respectfully supplements
appeal from the decision of the Planning. Commission to approve
the above ~en=ative tract, subject to certain conditions, as
follows:
Current Status of the Conditions of
If the current recommendations of the Planning Commission are
accepted by =he City Council, the following is the position of
the Applicant with respect to the conditions of approval:
No. Con4ition ~li~an~'s Position
1 Provide Drainage Acceptance Letter Agree
Utility Unde~grounding
(a) Sapphire Street Disagree
(b) Almond Street Agree on'soutH side only
3 Almond extension to west Agree to removal of condition
4 Centerline Crown Section Agree
5 Dedicate north half of Almond Disagree
6 Obtain north half of Almond Disagree
7 Emergency access road Agree to removal of condition
8 Sidewalk on one side only Agree
9 Construct Almond Intercept Channel Disagree
10 Almond full width to Henry Disagree
A1 24 month expiration Of map Agree
A6 Water quality letter Agree-Planning Commission has
clarified that a private sewer
system is acceptable if it meets
retirements of wa:er quality.
B1 Site developmen~ conditions Agree
B2 Plans and elevations approval Agree
B3 Plan approval before final map Agree
B4 No waiver of ordinances Agree
B7 Trash receptacles shielded Agree
BI0 Street name review Agree
Resolution No. 89-048
Page 18
Second Supplement to Appeal
January 18, 1989
Page Two
Bll Building number ID Agree
B17 Solar easements Agree
C3 Fire retardant materials Agree
E1 Landscape and irrigation plan Agree
E2 Tree removal permit required Agree
E3 Street trees Agree
E8 Trees on slopes Agree
E9 Slope maintenance Agree
El0 Landscape maintenance Agree
El2 Landscape plan approval Agree
El4 Water and energy conservation Agree
El5 Landscape maintenance district Agree
G1 Secondary access Disagree-Henry Street is
'sufficient per fire district
requirement. Condition should
be removed.
G2 Access during construction Agree
G3 Water supply during construction Agree
G4 Mail boxes Agree
G6 Water and sewer plans Agree-Planning Commission h~s
clarified that a private sewer
system is acceptable if it meets
requirements of water quali~y.
Hi Comply with uniform codes Agree
H2 Pay fees prior to permits Agree
H4 Street addresses Agree
I4 Location of underground utilities Agree, where Applicant has
agreed to underground
utilities.
J1 Grading plan Agree
J2 Soils report Agree
J3 Soil Disturbance Permit required Agree
J5 Final grading plans before permit Agree
K1 Trail and street dedications Agree
K2 Almond Street 42 foot dedication Agree to dedicate portion on
Applicant's property only.
K4 Corner property line radius Agree
K5 Non-vehicular access on Agree to dedicate portion on
Almond and Sapphire Ap~%cant's proper~y only.
K7 Private drainage easements Agree, dedication per ordinance
K8 Existing easements on map Agree
L1 Interior street improvements Agree, except north side of
Almond.
Resolution No. 89-048
Page 19
Second Supplement to Appeal
January 18, 1989
Page Three
L2 26 foot wide pavement Agree, except south side of
Almond only where owned by
Applicant.
L3 Almond and Sapphire improvements Agree, except north side of
Almond and underground utilities
on east side of Sapphire S%reet,
or paying in-lieu fees.
L4 Fee payment before work Agree
L5 Street improvements approved Agree
L6 Parkway landscape plan Agree
L7 Posting of security Agree if "surety" changed to
"security."
L10 Street improvements approved Agree
Lll Striping and signs approved Agree
L12 Street closure permit required Agree
M1 On-site drainage Agree
M5 Accept off-site drainage Agree, except building of
Almond Intercept Channel.
M7 Submit drainage study Agree
N1 Provide utility services Agree-Planning Commission has
clarified that a private sewer
system is acceptable if it meets
requirements of water quality.
N2 Relocate existing utilities Agree, except to extent of
undergrounding existing
utilities along Sapphire,
or paying in-lieu fees.
02 Annex parkways Agree
07 Notice re maintenance district Agree
Items Resolved Throuqh Pla~lnq Commission
The Planning Commission, after review with legal counsel, has
agreed to remove Condition 3 and Condition 7. Applicant agrees
with uhe elimination of these conditions, and fur=her suggests
that Condition G1 be modified to make it clear no further
extension of Almond Street past the proposed Henry $~reet is
required.