HomeMy WebLinkAbout86-187 - ResolutionsRESOLUTIO8 NO, 86-187
A RESOLUTIC8 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCANeHGA APPROVING AH APPLICATIO~ FOR DEVELOPNI~T REVIE~
NO. D.R. 85-53, FOR DEVELOPM~iT OF THREE (3) INDUSTRIAL
BUILDINGS ON PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN THE GENERAL
INDUSTRIAL/filL SERVED DISTRICT (SUBAREA 5), 300 FEET WEST
OF TUBHER AV~DE, RANCHO CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, AHD ItSKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF
A. RECITALS.
(i) A~NOLD D. ANDERSON and RICEAED AV~NT have filed an application
for Development Review No. D.R.85-53, described above in the title of this
Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review
request is referred to as the "application".
(ii) On April 23, 1986, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamouga adopted its Resolution No. 86-45, thereby approving the application
subject to all Conditions and Standard Conditions contained in said Resolucion.
(iil) The decision represented by said Planning Commission Resolution
No. 86-~5 was timely appealed to this Council by the applicants referenced in
subparqrapb (i) above. Said applicants specifically appealed the imposition
of t~o conditions of Resolution No. 85-53 described as follows:
1. The requirement for a meandering sidewalk on Sixth Street
(Standard conditions - M 3);
2. The requirement for undergrounding of existing utilities
(Condition No. I - Engineering Division).
(iv) On June 4, 1986, this Council conducted a hearing with respect
to the appeal of the conditions of Resolution No. 86-45 and concluded said
hearing on that date,
(v) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have
occurred.
B. R~qOLUTIrm,
NW, THSIEFORE, it is found, determined and resolved by the City
Council of the tit7 of Rencbo Cutassess as follows:
1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set
forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. This Council hereby finds and certifies that the project has been
reviewed and considered in compliance with the Environmental Quality Act of
1970 and concurs with that Negative Declaration issued with respect to the
project on April 23, 1986.
3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during
the above-referenced June 4, 1986, bearing, including written staff reports,
the minutes of the abovereferenced Planning Commission meeting and the contents
of Planning Cosmission Resolution No. 86-54, this Council specifically finds as
follows:
a. The application applies to proper~y within the Ceneral
Industrial/Rail Served District (Subarea 5) and is located on the north side of
Sixth Street, 300 feet west of Turner Avenue;
Resolution No. 86-187
Page 2
b. The properties to the north and south of the subject site are
located within the General Industrial/Rail Served District and are currently
undeveloped and vacant. The properties to the east and west of the subject site
are located with abe General Industrial/Rail Served District and are developed
respectively with existing industrial buildings and an existing industrial
park;
c. The project contemplates the construction of tbtee (3) industrial
buildings totaling 61,845 square feet on 4.47 acres of land. The proposed
project was previously apptoved in 1980 for the development of four (4)
multi-tenant industrial buildings. The developer bad completed one of the
buildings and graded pads for the remaining three (3) buildings; boseever, the
approval for the remaining three (3) buildings has expired thereby
necessitating the present application. Such a use ss contemplated conforms to
the Canetel Plan of the City of Rancbo Cucamonga and is a permitted use within
the Genersl Industrial/Rail Served District of the Industrial Specific Plan;
d. The application has been submitted pursuant to the requirements
of Chapter 17.06 of the Development Code to allow design review of the proposed
use so as to minimize any adverse impact on the visual or aesthetic environment
surrounding the subject site and to insure a harmonious appearance of the
proposed use in conformity with sll applicable local design guidelines,
standards and ordinances;
e. The Condition of Resolution So. 86-45 requiting the
undergrounding of existing utilities (Condition No. I - Engineering Division)
is not required or necessary along Sixth Street since the existing overhead
utilities contsin 66 K.V. lines which would not be undergrounded pursuant to
this Condition. Accordingly, there would be no material improvement in
aesthetic quality by the requiresent of undergrounding only electrical (less
than 66 K.V.) and telecoamunication lines fromring the project;
f- The Condition of Resolution No. 86-45 requiring the installation
of meandering sidewalks (Stsndard Conditions - M3) is not necessary or required
since the City does not possess design standards for such sidewalks for the
area surrounding the subject site and there are currently no sidewalks existing
on parcels immediately adjacent to the subject site. Accordingly, without
existing contiguous sidewalks or design standards, any sidewalks installed
under this spplication would not be gusrsnteed in compliance with sidewalks
designed for the area and installed at a later date.
4. Based on the substantial evidence presented to this Council
during the above-referenced June 4, 1986, hearing and upon the specific finding
of facts set forth in parngtapbs 1, 2 and 3 above, this Council hereby finds
and concludes as follows:
a. The proposed use is consistent with the objectives of the General
Plan of the City of Rmncho Cucamonga;
b. The proposed use is in accord with the objectives of the
Development Code of the City of Rmncbo Cucamonga and the purposes of the
Industrial Specific Plan and the district in which the site is located; and
c. The proposed use, together with the Conditions applicable
thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare and
will not be materially injurious to properties and improvements in the
vicinity.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs
1, 2, 3 and 4 above, this Council hereby approves the application subject to
all Conditions and Standard Conditions as set forth in Planning Commission
Resolution Jo. 86-54 (a full, true and correct copy is attached hereto, marked
as Exhibit "AN) with the exception and deletion of the following Conditions:
Resolution No. 86-187
Page 3
a. The requirement for undergrounding of existing overhead utilities
(Condition No. I - Engineering Division); and
b. The requirement for the installation of meandering sidewalks
(Standard Conditions - MJ).
6. This Council hereby provides notice to Mr. Arnold D. Anderson and
Mr. Richard Avent, that the time within which judicial review of the decision
represented by this Resolution must be sought is governed by the provisions of
California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6.
7. The City Clerk is hereby directed to: (a) certify to the
adoption of this Resolution, and (b) forthwith transmit a certified copy of
this Resolution, by Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested, to Mr. Arnold D.
Anderson and Mr. Richard Avent at their respective addresses as per City
records.
PASSE, APPROVE, and ADOPTED this 18tb day of June, 1986.
AYES: MikeIs, Buquet, Zing, Dahl, Wright
NOES: None
ABS~qT: None
ATTEST:
Beverly A~Autbelet, Ci~y ~J]~'
I, BBVRIrt.y A. AUTRgLET, CITY CLERI of the Cit7 of Rencho Cucamonga,
California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed,
approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rencho Cucamonga,
California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 18tb day of
June, 1986.
Executed this 19th day of June, 1986 at Rencho Cucamonga, California.
Beverly A~Authelet, City Clerk